HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 1993/05/18
Tuesday, May 18, 1993
6:00 p.m.
'" declare under penalty of perjury tha' I am
emplo~red by 'l'-'c C:ty of C11u!a Vista in the
Office Q'i the 'Citv Clc'~k :::;~'l,"i ""9~~ I pos:.ed
this AC~ClF.;~/No'~ke C~.; \~le :_:-l;JC(;~~ E>::-~rd at
the Fublic ... r....j 5 BU;!ciinJ iln t i'y"t-:all on
DATED, SIGNED "
Resmlar
Council Chambers
Public Services Building
CAlL TO ORDER
1.
ROll CAlL:
Councilmembers Fox ~ Horton _, Moore _, Rindone _, and Mayor
Nader _
2. PLEDGE OF AllEGIANCE TO TIlE FLAG. SILENT PRAYER
3.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
May 4, 1993.
4. SPECJAL ORDERS OF TIlE DAY:
a. Proclamation commending the Racers Against Aids (R.AJ.D.S.) Team - Tbe proclamation
will be presented by Mayor Nader to Tbad Tinney and Lance Mears, founders of the
RALD.S. Foundation.
CONSENT CALENDAR
(Items 5 through 14)
The staff recommendiltions regarding the following iJons 1istet1 under the Consent CaJendnr will be enm:ted by the
Council by one motion wilhouJ discussion unless a CounciImember, a member of the pub/ii; or City staff requests
that the item be pulled for discussion. If you wish to speak on one of these items, pkose fill out a "Request to
Speak Form" available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. (Complete the green form
to speak in favor of the stoff recommendation; complete the pink form to speak in opposition to the staff
recommendation.) Items pulled from the Consent CaJendnr will be discussed after Board and Commission
Recommendations and Action Items. Items pulled by the pub/ii; will be the first iJons of business.
5. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS:
a. Letter requesting an ordinance whereby the property owners would be responsible for
maintaining any and all tree branches and vegetation that extend beyond property lines
George and Riette Suzzette Ormond, 411 Kearney Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910. It is not
recommended that adoption of a City ordinance regulating encroachment of plant materials
on neighboring property be pursued.
b. Letter requesting support of Resolution opposing shift in property tax revenues away from
City and County governments - Eliseo Medina, S.E.LU. Service Council, 4004 Kearney Mesa
Road, San Diego, CA. 92111. It is recommended that Council adopt the proposed
resolution.
"
RESOLUTION 17117 OPPOSING TIlE REDUcnON IN PROPERTY TAX REVENUES FOR
CITY AND COUNTY GOVERNMENTS AND URGING TIlE STATE
LEGISLATURE TO SEEK ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF FUNDING
Agenda
-2-
May 18,1993
6. ORDINANCE 2558 IMPOSING, AS AN INTERIM AND URGENCY MEASURE, A 9O-DAY
MORATORIUM ONlHEACCEPTANCE, PROCESSING AND/OR APPROVAL
OF APPIJCATIONS FOR ADULT-ORIENTED RECREATION BUSINESSES
(llI'l!encv) - Concern has been expressed wirh respect to a pending
application for an adult-oriented night club at 2350 Main Street that the
City's existing regulations for adult-oriented recreation businesses as
itemized in Section 19.58.024 of rhe Municipal Code may not adequately
protect rhe public healrh, safety and welfare. In order to provide a
reasonable period of time to study rhe regulations for possible amendment,
and to ensure that any application accepted, processed and/or approved by
rhe City is consistent with any such amendment, it is appropriate to adopt
as an interim, urgency measure a 90-day moratorium on the acceptance,
processing and/or approval of applications for adult-oriented recreation
businesses. Staff recommends Council adopt the urgency ordinance.
(Director of Planning) 4/5rh's vote required.
7. ORDINANCE 2557 PREZONING 1.05 ACRES LOCATED AT 4045 PALM DRIVE TO
RESIDENI1AL ESTATE ("RE") ZONE, MAKING NECESSARY FINDINGS
(second readinl!: and adoption) - The applicant desires to construct a single
family dwelling which requires provision of City sewer service. Annexation
is necessary in conjunction with extending service. The subject prezoning
is required by the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) as part of
the annexation process. Staff recommends Council place the ordinance on
second reading and adoption. (Director of Planning)
8. ORDINANCE 2556 AMENDING EXHIBIT A OF ORDINANCE 2546 ADOPTING CALIFORNIA
COASTAL COMMISSION'S JANUARY IS, 1993 ACTIONS ON THE CITY'S
LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM RESUBMITTAL NUMBER EIGHT AND
ACCEPTING AND INCORPORATING MODIFICATIONS TO THE SPECIFIC
PLAN (first readinl!:) - On 1/15/93, the California Coastal Commission
adopted Local Coastal Program (LCP) Number Eight for development of the
Midbayfront with modifications that were acceptable to City staff and
consultants. Council adopted and authorized the California Coastal
Commission actions on 3/16/93. However, one Coastal Commission
modification to the Specific Plan was not included. Staff recommends
Council place the ordinance on first reading. (Director of Community
Development) Continued from rhe meeting of 5/11/93.
9. RESOLlJIlON 17118 ACCEPTING THE DONATION OF TRAVEL EXPENSES TO ATTEND
SOUTIlWEST REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL DIALOGUE PROJECT IN
SEDONA. ARIZONA, JUNE 14 AND 15, 1993 - SDG&E has invited a
representative of the City to attend this environmental conference. Staff
recommends approval of the resolution. (Administration)
lOA RESOLlJIlON 17119 AUTIIORIZING THE APPROPRIATION AND EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS: 1)
RECEIVED THROUGH A GRANT FROM THE STATE OFFICE OF TRAFFIC
SAFETY ($13,000); 2) RECEIVED FROM THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY
MANAGEMENT AGENCY (FEMA) FOR GENERAL FUND EXPENSES
INCURRED DURING THE CIVIL UNREST OF MAY, 1992 ($17,000); AND,
Agenda
-3-
May 18,1993
3) DEPOSITED INTO FUND 218, ASSET SEIZURE ($6,150) TO PURCHASE
AND EQUIP A MOBILE EMERGENCY COMMAND POST - The item will
enable staff to proceed witb tbe development of a mobile emergency
command post (MECP). The proposed MECP will provide tbe Police and
Fire Departments witb a fully-functional, state-of-the-art equipped, mobile
command and communications station. The MECP will be used to
command field operations during critical incidents, natural disasters,
sobriety checkpoints, and to meet community policing needs. Additionally,
the MECP will be used at community events. The proposed funding
provides for tbe MECP to be purchased and equipped at no cost to tbe
General Fund. Staff recommends approval of tbe resolutions. (Chief of
Police) 4/5th's vote required.
B. RESOLUTION 17120 AlTOiORlZING TIiE SUBMITTAL OF A GRANT APPUCATION TO TIiE
PEDERALEMERGENCYMANAGEMENT AGENCY TO PROVIDE MATCHING
FUNDS TO OFFSET COSTS RELATED TO TIiE PURCHASE OF
COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT FOR A MOBILE EMERGENCY
COMMAND POST
11. RESOLUTION 17121 ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT TO KNOX ELECTRIC INC_
FOR TRAFFIC SIGNAL INSTAllATION AT THIRD AVENUE AND ANITA
STREET - On 4/28/93, sealed bids were received from seven electrical
contractors for the installation of traffic signals at Third Avenue and Anita
Street. The low bid of $53,035.34 was received from Knox Electric, Inc.
and is below the estimate of $59,880. Staff recommends approval of the
resolution. (Director of Public Works)
12. RESOLUTION 17108 APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO TIiE CHULA VISTA PORTION OF TIiE
1992-99REGIONAL TRANSPORTATIONIMPROVEMENTPROGRAM (RTIP)
AND AlTOiORlZING ITS SUBMITTAL TO TIiE SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION
OF GOVERNMENTS (SANDAG) - The second amendment to the RTIP will
be directed primarily at changes for tbe second year of the 1992-99 RTIP
or for Fiscal Year (PY) 1994. Changes to FY 1993 necessary to carry over
projects or funds to FY 1994 will also be considered by the SANDAG Board
of Directors. Project or funding changes beyond FY 1994 will be
considered as part of the development of tbe new 1994-2001 RTIP. In
June 1993, SANDAG will be amending tbe 1992-99 RTIP. Staff
recommends approval of tbe resolution. (Director of Public Works)
Continued from the meeting of 5/11/93.
13. REPORT PETITION PROM NEIGHBORS REGARDING PARKING PROBLEMS WITH
Aura REPAIR SHOP AT REAR OF 363 "E" STREET - On 3/2/93, Council
considered a petition from surrounding residents regarding parking and
otber problems associated witb an auto repair shop located at tbe rear of
363 "E" Street. Staff was directed to meet with the neighbors and business
owners, review previous Council action on the issue, and report back
witbin 30 days. Staff recommends Council accept the report and direct
staff to monitor the situation and report back no later than 8/1/93.
(Director of Building and Housing and Director of Planning) Continued
from the meeting of 5/1/93_
Agenda
14.
REPORT
-4-
May 18,1993
RESPONSE TO STATEMENT BY MS. REGINA HICKEY TIiAT STAFF HAS
DISCOURAGED AN AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECT - At the Council
meeting on 5/4/93, Ms. Hickey stated that she had submitted plans last
year for a low-rent housing project, but had been discouraged by the
Planning Dept based upon their opposition to affordable housing. Council
directed staff to respond in one week. Staff recommends Council accept
the report. (Director of Planning) Continued from the meeting of
5/11193.
* * END OF CONSENT CALENDAR * *
PUBUC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
~ foUowing items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearin&, as required by law. If you wish to speak
to any item, please frIl out the "Reqtust to Speak Form" available in the lobby and submit it to the CiJy Clerlc prior
to the meeting. (Complete the green form to speak in favor of the stoff recommendation; complete the pink form
to speak in opposition to the staff recommendation.) Comments are 1imited to five minutes per individual
15.
PUBUC HEARING
16.
PUBUC HEARING
TO CONSIDER ADOPTION OF AN INTERIM PRE-SR-I25 DEVELOPMENT
IMPACT FEE AND TO CONSIDER MODIFICATION OF TIlE EXISTING
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE - Consideration of an
interim SR-125 report, adoption of an interim pre-SR-125 Transportation
Development Impact Fee and modification of the existing Transportation
Development Impact Fee. Staff recommends that the Dublic hearinl!: be
continued to 6/8/93. (Director of Public Works)
CONDmONAL USE PERMIT PCC-93-16; REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A 60
FOOT CEIJ..ULAR ANTENNA AND COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT
SHELTER AT 719 ANITA STREET - APPUCANT: PACTEL CEIJ..ULAR -
PacTel Cellular is proposing to construct a 60 foot high cellular antenna
and communications equipment shelter in the IL-P Zone located at 779
Anita Street immediately adjacent to Interstate 5 at the southwest comer
of APN 662-102-12. Staff recommends approval of the resolution.
(Director of Planning)
RESOLUTION 17122 APPROVING PCC-93-16, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A 60 FOOT
CEIJ..ULARANTENNAAND COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT SHELTER IN
TIlE IL-P ZONE LOCATED AT 719 ANITA STREET IMMEDIATELY
ADJACENT TO INTERSTATE 5 AT TIlE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF APN
622-102-12
17.
PUBUC HEARING
CONDmONAL USE PERMIT PCC-93-26; REQUEST TO ESTABUSH AN
EDUCATIONAL FAOUTY AT 660 BAY BOUI.EVARD (NATIONAL
UNIVERSITY) - FOSTER PROPERTIES - The applicant, Foster Properties, in
connection with the potential lease of the property to National University,
has submitted an application for a Conditional Use Permit to establish a
university/continuing education facility in an existing office/research
structure in the I (General Industrial) zoning district at 660 Bay Boulevard,
not to exceed 150 students and 10 staff. The property is in the Coastal
Zone and subject to the Local Coastal Program and Bayfront
Redevelopment Plan. Staff recommends approval of the resolution.
(Director of Planning)
RESOLUTION 17123 APPROVING PCC-93-26, A REQUEST FOR A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
FOR A CONTINUING EDUCATION/UNIVERSITY FAOUTY AT 660 BAY
BOUI.EVARD IN TIlE I (GENERAL INDUSTRIAL) ZONING DISTRICT
Agenda
-5-
May 18,1993
18.
PUBUC HEARING
CONSIDERING COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NUMBER 63 TO AU.OW
AN ACADEMIC UNIVERSITY TO BE LOCATED AT 660 BAY BOULEVARD
The project proposal entails National University utilizing approximately
8,000 square feet of existing office space within an Industrial General Area
of the Bayfront Coastal Zone. Environmental Review of the project has
been conducted and Negative Declaration IS-93-28 was issued. A
Conditional Use Permit and a Coastal Development Permit will be required.
Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Community
Development)
RESOLUTION 17124 ADOPTING NEGATIVE DECLARATION 1S-93-28 AND ISSUING COASTAL
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NUMBER 63 TO AU.OW AN ACADEMIC
UNlVERSI1Y AT 660 BAY BOULEVARD
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
This is an opportuniIy for the general publk to oddnss the CiI.y Cowu:il 011 any subject nulltD within the Cowu:il's
jruisdiction tJuJt is not an item 011 this agend4 (State lJJw, however, gmeraIly prohibits the city Cowu:il from
toking action 011 any issues not im;luded 011 the posted agenda.) If you wish to address the Cowu:il 011 such a
subject, p1eose complete the yeUow "Request to Speak Undo Oral Communications Form" avaiJJlb1e in the lobby
and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Those who wish to speok, p1eose give your 1IQ1ne and address
for record purposes and follow up action. Your time is 1imited to /Juu minutes pet' speoku.
BOARD AND COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
This is the time the City Cowu:il will consUler items whidl have ban forwarded to them for consUleration by 0IIt!
of the CiI.y's Boards, Commissions and/or Committees..
None submitted.
ACTION ITEMS
~ items listed in this section of the agmdD IlTt! expected to elkit substanlial discussions and deliberations by the
CoundI, staff, or members of the general publU:. ~ items will be considered individually by the Cowu:il and st/lff
Tt!cornrnouJoJions may in certoin cases be prest!1lted in the aJtemotive. Those who wish to speok, p1eose fill 0I.It
a "Request to Speak." form avaiJJlb1e in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Publk
comments IlTt! 1imited to five minutes.
19. RESOLUTION 17125 APPROVING TIIE 1993-94 COMMUNI1Y DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
(CDBG) BUDGET AND AUTIiORIZING SUBMITTAL OF TIIE CDBG
APPUCATION, FINAL STATEMENT, AND CERTIFICATIONS TO TIIE U.S.
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT. In Fiscal Year
1993.94, the City will receive 1,664,000 in CDBG entitlement funds and
anticipates receiving other program income of about $642,672. Staff
recommendations are summarized in the Proposed CDBG Budget. Staff has
thoroughly considered the recommendations of several advisory
commissions and committees and the comments made at the public
hearings. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of
Community Development) Continued from the meeting of 5/11/93.
Agenda
.6.
May 18,1993
20.
REPORT
ANAL'YZING 1WO ALTERNATIVES FOR TIiE OTAY VALLEY REGIONAL
PARK FOCUS PLANNING AREA - In considering the Otay Valley Regional
Park Focus Planning Area (FPA), two alternatives will be explored: (1) the
FPA as endorsed by the Otay Valley Regional Park Policy and Citizen
Advisory committees; and (2) a modification to the FPA which identifies
Poggi, Wolf and Salt Creek Canyons and the area around the lakes as a
special study area. Staff recommends Council support Alternative Number
Two, thereby endorsing the proposed FPA and special study area for the
Otay Valley Regional Park planning process. (Director of Parks and
Recreation) Continued from the meeting of 5/11/93.
ITEMS PUIJ.ED FROM TIiE CONSENT CALENDAR
This is the time the City Council wi1I discuss items which have been removed from the Consmt Calendar. Agenda
items puUed at the request of the pubIK wi1I be considered prior to those puJkd by Cowu:iJmembers. PubIK
comments are 1imited to five minutes per individual
OTIIER BUSINESS
21. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT(S)
a. Scheduling of meetings.
22. MAYOR'S REPORT(S)
a. Strengthening sexual harassment policy.
b. Creation of a Budget & Operations Oversight (Ltl Hoover) Commission.
c. Discussion of County Prisoner Release Policy. Continued from the meeting of 5/1 V93.
23. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilwoman Horton
LEGISLATIVE ITEMS REOUIRING COUNCIL DISCUSSION/ACIlON:
a. SB 36 (l(oOD): Amendments to the Brown Act.
Recommendation: OPPOSE
b. ACA 25 (Woodruff): State Colleste/Universitv Fundinst Guarantees.
Recommendation: OPPOSE
Agenda
-7-
May 18,1993
Councilman Moore
c. Regional solid waste update. Continued from the meeting of 5/11/93_
d. Discussion and potential action regarding next phase of Memorial Park improvements (Le.
location of new rest room, expansion of museum. etc.). Continued from the meeting of
5/11/93.
ADJOURNMENf
The City Council will meet in a closed session immediately following the Council meeting to discuss:
Pending litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 - EPA vs. the City of San Diego,
Chula Vista amicus party discussion, instructions to attorneys.
Instruction to negotiators pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 - Chula Vista Bayfront
negotiations.
Instruction to negotiators pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 - Chula Vista Employees
Association (CVEA), Western Council of Engineers (WCE) , Police Officers Association (POA) ,
International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF), Executive Management, Mid-Management, and
Unrepresented.
Pending litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 - Chula Vista vs. Thermo King.
The meeting will adjourn to (a closed session and thence to) the Regular City Council Meeting on May 25,
1993 at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers and thence to a Regular Worksession/Meeting on Thursday,
May 27, 1993 at 4:00 p.m. in the Council Conference Room.
A Meeting of the Redevelopment Agency will be held immediately following the City Council meeting.
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
fa.-
Meeting Date 5/18/93
ITEM TITLE: Proclamation - COMMENDING RACERS AGAINST AIDS (R.A.I.D.S.)
SUBMITTED BY:
(4/5ths Vote: Yes No xxl
Mayor Tim Nader~
The proclamation COMMENDING RACERS AGAINST AIDS will be presented by Mayor
Nader to Thad Tinney and Lance Mears, founders of the R.A.I.D.S. Foundation.
Form A-113 (Rev. 11/79)
10-- ... /
May 12, 1993
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
The Honorable Mayor and City Councir'
John D. Goss, City ManagerJ~ Db M1
City Council Meeting of May 18, 1993
This will transmit the agenda and related materials for the regular City Council
meeting of Tuesday, May 18, 1993. Comments regarding the Written Communications
are as follows:
Sa. This is a letter from Mr. and Mrs. George Ormond of 411 Kearney Street
requesting the City to adopt an ordinance making property owners
responsible for maintaining plans which extend beyond their property line.
The City Attorney's Office was contacted by Mrs. Ormond in March regarding
this problem, and the attached response was sent to her, informing her of
the civil remedies that could be pursued. Traditionally, complaints of
this nature have been considered disputes between property owners, and not
within the purview of the City. Due to the staff time that would have to
be expended to enforce such an ordinance were the City to adopt one, IT IS
NOT RECOMMENDED THAT ADOPTION OF A CITY ORDINANCE REGULATING ENCROACHMENT
OF PLANT MATERIALS ON NEIGHBORING PROPERTY BE PURSUED.
5b. This is a letter from Eliseo Medina, Executive Director of the Service
Employees International Union (S.E.I.U.) Service Council, requesting that
the City Counc i 1 adopt a reso 1 ut i on oppos i ng the proposed $2.6 Bill ion
property tax sh ift from loca 1 governments to schoo 1 s. S. E. I. U. is
requesting various local governments they represent State-wide to adopt
this resolution in support of their march on the Capitol scheduled for
Wednesday, May 19, in Sacramento. The 1993 Legislative Program
specifically addresses this issue, "opposing efforts which reallocate
sales and property tax revenue to the detriment of local governments"
(Section I.B.2.e). S.E.I.U. will be meeting with the League of California
Cities on 5/14/93 to coordinate their support for the rally. Staff also
contacted the County of San Diego and although it has not taken action on
the S.E.I.U. request, the County will be coordinating the adoption of a
County-wide "Declaration of Unity", expressing similar views, to be
transmitted to Sacramento on the 19th of May. Although S.E. I.U. has
stated that other c it i es they represent in San Diego County have been
contacted, staff has been unab le to conf i rm adopt i on of the proposed
resolution by any other San Diego County city at this time. In view of
the significant impact on the City of Chula Vista of the proposed property
tax shift, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT COUNCIL ADOPT THE PROPOSED RESOLUTION.
JDG:mab
411 Kearney street
Chula Vista, Ca 91910
lelephone: 619 691/6300
Re: lrees / lree Branches
S2P ~
-4- ::0
-<-<
('")0 ~ fT1
,""11 0
me:>
:::CJ;:x: - fT1
::-SC 0 <
(/l'
0:D' :J:> fT1
-n-:. \0 0
-n'"~"
_v ~
("")--<
rn ):> VI
CI1Y OF CHULA VIS1A
Honorable Mayor and City Council
278 FOUR1H AVENUE
CHULA VIS1A, CA 91910
Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council:
An ordinance should be enacted whereby the property owner will
be totally responsible for:
1. lrees on his/her property.
2. 1ree branches encroaching onto a neighbor's property.
1he property owner should be responsible for maintaining any and
all tree branches and vegetation that extend beyond his property
line.
1he property owner should trim any and all branches that extend
beyond his/her property line onto the neighbor's property.
lhere is no ordinance or law that requires a property owner to
maintain his/her trees so that neighbors/property owners will not
have to suffer, when such trees and/or branches are "...an
obstruction to the free use of property so as to interfere with the
comfortable enjoyment of life or property,..." such a tree should be
UNEOUIVOCALLY LABELED AS A NUISANCE WI1HOU1 FUR1HER PROOF.
1he law does ~ now state unequivocally that it is against the
law for branches to hang beyond ones property line. 1he property
owner/neighbor must prove that the branches are a nuisance or causing
a problem.
/'
.~ f U O!l!ll
CZJir/ ;j ~ ~ ~ ~ 9?ic;;J
CZJa-ve-g~
\'
te Ormond
"'
~"I
RESOLUTION NO.
/ /117
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA OPPOSING THE REDUCTION IN PROPERTY
TAX REVENUES FOR CITY AND COUNTY GOVERNMENTS
AND URGING THE STATE LEGISLATURE TO SEEK
ALTERNATIVE METHODS OF FUNDING
WHEREAS, the California State Budget, as presently
proposed, calls for shifting $2.6 billion in property tax revenues
away from local city and county governments and putting them into
the state general fund to pay for educational services; and
WHEREAS, these tax revenues are currently used by cities
and counties for law enforcement, parks and recreation, libraries
and other essential services; and
WHEREAS, current economic difficulties have caused major
reductions in many of these essential services; and
WHEREAS, the proposed $2.6 billion property tax shift
would result in further drastic reductions, in many cases wiping
out these services entirely; and
WHEREAS, this would have a devastating effect on the
health, safety, well being, economic future of our citizens.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city Council of
the City of Chula vista does hereby oppose shifting $2.6 billion in
property tax revenues away from city and county governments where
they are used to fund already declining local services.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City
of Chula vista does hereby urge the California State Legislature to
seek alternative methods of funding much needed state-wide
educational services.
Presented by
Approved as to
/) ~
/~ (,I.
Bruce M. Boogaard, City Attorney
John Goss, City Manager
F:\bome\attomey\proptax.rev
5b~~
MAY 18, 1993 COUNCIL MEE1ING
1. CI1Y All0RNEY INSIS1ED lHAl lHERE IS A LAW COVERING lHIS.
2. HE WAS PROVEN WRONG.
3. HE WAS EMBARRASSED.
4. IN ORDER 10 OVERCOME
HE RECOMMENDED AGAINSl 11.
lHE
EMBARRASSMEN1,
5. OR IS 11 lHA~ HE HIMSELF IS IN ~HIS SI~UA~ION?
6. HE FEELS lHAl lHERE SHOULD NOl BE AN01HER LAW
~HAl NEEDS ENFORCEMEN1.
7. WHY SHOULD WE BE RESPONSIBLE FOR SOMEBODY'S PROPER~Y?
8. WE HAVE 10 SPEND HOURS CLEANING BECAUSE lHE NEIGHBOR
WAmS ~REES IN HIS/HER YARD WI1HOUl lHE RESPONSIBUI1Y
INVOLVED.
9. WE ARE BEING DEPRIVED OF ENJOYMEN~ OF OUR PROPERlY
WHICH INCLUDES OUR BACKYARD, OUR POOL AND OUR PA~IO.
10. OUR POOL IS S~AINED FROM lHE LEAVES.
11. WE HAVE 10 SPEND lIME lAKING DRIED LEAVES
OFF OUR POOL COVER SEVERAL lIMES A WEEK IN ORDER 10 ADD
POOL CHEMICALS.
12. WE HAVE 10 SPEND lIME lAKING lEAVES OUl OF lHE POOL.
PERHAPS A MEMBER OF lHE SlAFF OR A FRIEND OF HIS HAS A lREE ON
HIS/HER PROPERlY WHICH lHEY DON'l WANl 10 lAKE CARE OF.
---- -"/
,};; c.L--- J
AN ORDINANCE SHOULD BE PASSED ~O REQUIRE:
1. PROPERH OWNERS SHOULD BE OBLIGAnD ~O ~AKE CARE OF
EVERY~HTNG PLAN~ED OR HOUSED ON ~BEIR PROPER~Y.
EXAMPLES .OFORDINANCES NOW IN EFFEC1:
1.
CAN'i LliiER iHE SiREEi,
SECUON 8.24.210
BUl CAN LI~~ER MY BACK YARD,
CAN LliiER MY PAiIO,
CAN LIllER MY POOL
PICKUP AND CARRY OUl ~O iHE SiREEl FOR iHE iRASH MAN.
KEEP BOXES iO PICKUP LIliER.
PEOPLE ARE FINED FOR LIiiERING,
BUi LInERING MY BACKYARD IS A UEfI IHSDEIV!EANOR.
BY NO~ PASSING
LnnRING.
UIS
ORDINANCE
YOU
ARE
CONDONING
2. IF I AM DRIVING DOWN iHE SiREEi AND SOMEiHING FLIES OUi
OF MY CAR WINDOW I CAN BE CIiED FOR lIllERING EVEN
lHOUGH Il WAS UNINlEN1IONAL.
BUi LliiERING MY YARD IS iGiALLY TNiENiIONAL.
3. NO ONE CAN LEGALLY LEAVE A CAR ON SlREEl FOR tlQl MORE ~HAN
72 HOURS. SECiION 10.52.100
4.
EMPiY LGiS AND PROPERiY/HOUSE FRONiAGE
MAINiAINED. SECiION 8.4.050 AND 8.24.060
MUSi
BE
5. YOU CANNOi DUMP DRY LEAVES ON iHE SiREEi.
$1,000 FINE FOR LIliERING.
6. CAR DRIPPING OIL ON lHE SiREE1. VEHICLE CODE
7. "ANYONE OWNING A DOG lHAl DOG SHOULD NGi... (gO) ON PUBLIC
PROPERH OR ANY GiHER PROPERH lHAl BELONGS lO GiHERS.
DOG SHOULD BE CURBED. VIOLAlION. SHOULD REMOVE...AND PLACED
IN A RECEPiABLE." C.V. 6.4.050
8. LOUD MUSIC AND NUISANCE. 19.68.090
9. NUDIlY IN lHE NEIGHBORHOOD. SEC1ION 9.13.230 and 19.58.024
10.
AU10MOiIVE REPAIRS OR HAVING MORE iHAN
INOPERAlIVE VEHICLE. CHAP~ER 19.58.26 19.44.020
ONE
11. CANNGi HAVE A lRASHY YARD WI~H NUMEROUS VEHICLES.
"..
~
(---/
FROM LEAVES 10 LIllER
AN ORIGINAL POEM
By
GEORGE and RIE11E SUZZEllE
PEOPLE WHO LllER I MUSl CONFESS
GEl HEAVILY FINED FOR MAKING A MESS.
YEl LOOK Al MY BACKYARD, PLEASE DO
I SIl DOWN AND CRY BOO, HOO, HOO.
OVERHEAD LONG BRANCHES EX1END
LIKE SOME GIAN1'S FIL1HY OLD HAND.
WHERE EVER YOU LOOK, lHERE IS NO DOUBl
DRY LEAVES FROM LONG BRANCHES CAN BE SEEN ALL ABOU1.
WllH BOXES AND PAILS I SCOOP UP lHE SlUFF
CAN'l CON1INUE WllH lHIS, I'VE HAD ENOUGH.
LOOK Al MY BACKYARD, MY PAllO AND POOL, 11 MAKES ME SO SAD
IF lHIS WAS YOUR HOUSE, YOU'D FEEL YOU'D BEEN HAD.
I'M SURE LlllERING IS OFFENSIVE 10 YOU AND 10 ME
lHE FINE FOR LlllERING IS 1,000 DOLLARS YOU SEE.
LlllERING lHE SlREEl CANNOl BE 10LERA1ED
WHY lHEN SHOULD MY PROPERlY BE DOWN RA1ED.
WHE1HER Il'S PAPER, LEAVES, OR PLAIN JUNK
Il'S JUSl AS OBNOXIOUS AS lHE SMELL OF A SKUNK.
'::, t ( S
85/11/1993 15:49
519-55~-1299
PAGE ~2
S.E.I.U. SERVICE COUNCIL
of SAN DIEGO . RIVERSIDE . IMPERIAL COUNTIES
SERVICE EMPLOYEES INTERNATIONAL UNION, AFt-CIO, CLC
May 11, 1993
Beverly Authelet
city Clerk
City of Chula vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 92010
Dear Ms. Authelet:
Please accept the attached resolution for consideration and
adoption by the city Council at it's May 18, 1993 meeting.
Please advise as to the approximate time of presentation as I will
plan to make a brief statement.
If there 1s further infonation required, please do not hesitate to
contact me.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
,-/
EM/lIIh
,
ce.
, WI.nEN COMMUNICAT10r~;!,
~~'-/) ~ ~~3
~U. Local 102 . S.E.I.U. LoeaIl926 . P.O.A./S.B.I.U. LoeaII02
4004 Kcarny Mesa Road, San Diego, CA 92111 . (619) 56(H)151 . FAX (619) 560-1299 ....'
5b--/
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item ~
ITEM TITLE:
Meeting Date 5/18/93
O d' .2sfr:.I, ..
r mance mposmg as an mtenm urgency measure a
moratorium on the acceptance, processing and/or approval of applications
for adult -oriented recreation businesses
Director of Planning .;@;:1'
'\
City Manager~~ ~. 5~
(4/5ths Vote: YesXNo_)
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
Concern has been expressed with respect to a pending application for an adult-oriented night club
at 2350 Main Street that the City's existing regulations for adult -oriented recreation businesses
as itemized in Section 19.58.024 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code may not adequately protect
the public health, safety and welfare, In order to provide a reasonable period of time to study
these regulations for possible amendment, and to ensure that any application accepted, processed
and/or approved by the City is consistent with any such amendment, it is appropriate to adopt
as an interim, urgency measure a 90-day moratorium on the acceptance, processing and/or
approval of applications for adult-oriented recreation businesses.
The adoption of this ordinance requires a four-fifths (4/5ths) vote.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the interim, urgency ordinance.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable,
FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable.
(adultrc.al13)
~-~-"
ORDINANCE NO. ~~~~
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA IMPOSING, AS AN INTERIM AND
URGENCY MEASURE, A MORATORIUM ON THE ISSUANCE
OF LAND USE PERMITS, INCLUDING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMITS, FOR A PERIOD OF NINETY (90) DAYS
EXCEPT UPON CONSENT OF COUNCIL, FOR USE OF
LAND AS AN ADULT-ORIENTED RECREATION BUSINESS
The city Council of the city of Chula vista does hereby
ordain as follows:
SECTION I: There is hereby established an interim
moratorium, for the term herein specified, on the application for,
or issuance of, any zoning, rezoning, land use permits, conditional
use permits, variances and building permits (collectively
"permits") for Adult-oriented Recreation Businesses as the term is
defined in the city of Chula vista Municipal Code, and specifically
at section 19.58.024, within the city of Chula Vista, except that
an application for such Permits, not the issuance of Permits, may
be allowed upon application to, and approval by the city Council,
on a showing of hardship, and then only by written resolution of
the City council permitting such application, and on such
conditions as the city Council shall deem just. Nothing herein
shall be construed to allow the issuance of Permits during the
pendency of this moratorium.
SECTION II: In the event that the City Council grants
permission to file an application for Permits during the pendency
of this moratorium, it shall impose as a minimum condition of said
permission, among such other conditions it deems appropriate, that
if any Permit is eventually granted, the Permittee shall comply
with, and the city shall have the right to impose on such Permit
retroactively all criteria, including siting criteria, established
in the city's Municipal Code as may, from time to time, be amended
and specifically as may be amended as a result of the study
hereinbelow ordered by the City Council.
SECTION III: That said moratorium shall remain in effect
for a period of ninety (90) days' from the date of adoption hereof
unless otherwise subsequently extended or terminated by ordinance.
SECTION IV: The City Planning commission and the City
staff are hereby directed to commence a study of Adult-oriented
Recreation Businesses for the purpose of determining whether or not
our Municipal Code, with regard to such uses, should be amended to
redefine the locational requirements, determine whether the use
IThis is the maximum time permitted for the first moratorium
under S19.12.130.
~'3
should be permitted as a right or "on conditions" and if so, in
which zones of the City, and determine which if any conditions
should be imposed upon such uses. It should also study in which
zones of the City the use should be allowed or constrained or if
such uses should be required to be placed in other and different
zones from that which is currently allowed. The study shall also
evaluate the impact of other cities' zoning ordinance on a regional
or subregional basis for the purpose of determining what impact
other cities' zoning ordinance may cause the relocation of such
uses to be directed to areas within the City of Chula vista.
SECTION V: The staff is hereby directed to prepare, on
behalf of the city Council, a written report describing the
measures taken to alleviate the condition which led to the adoption
of this ordinance, and to file same in the office of the city Clerk
ten (10) days prior to the expiration hereof.
SECTION VI: This ordinance affects public safety,
health, and welfare of the City of Chula vista and its inhabitants
and therefore shall take full force and effect immediately upon
final passage and adoption thereof. The facts establishing
emergency are as follows:
1. Recent case law has been issued permitting cities to
establish new and different locational requirements on Adult-
Oriented Businesses and the city believes that this will have an
impact on the relocation of such businesses within the subregion of
South San Diego County and, therefore, may result in an
overconcentration of such businesses within the City of Chula vista
if the city of Chula vista fails to adopt constitutionally
permissible zoning restrictions comparable to other jurisdictions
within the South Bay.
2. The city finds such uses to have certain significant,
adverse social consequences despite the extent to which their right
to exist may be protected by the First Amendment and such adverse
social consequences require regulation as to time, place and manner
in a way that is not adequately addressed under our current zoning
scheme.
3. Such adverse social impacts of such uses include, but
are not limited to, the concentration of criminal activity, the
tendency to promote an attitude of degradation and/or subjugation
of women in society.
4. The City finds that there are some uses of property
such as Adult-oriented Recreation Businesses, which have
operational characteristics which have historically produced or
augmented the economic, physical and social decline of adjacent
areas where they have been ineffectively regulated.
l.
~~1
5. The implementation of the results of the study are
necessary to supplement existing regulation of Adult-oriented
Recreation Businesses and that without such modification the
health, safety and welfare of the city's residents would be
compromised.
SECTION VII: The City Clerk shall certify to the passage
and adoption of this Ordinance by a vote of at least four-fifths of
the city Council of the City of Chula vista pursuant to Charter
Section 3l1(d); shall cause the same to be entered in the book of
original ordinances of said city; shall make a minute of the
passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings of
the City Council of said City in the minutes of the meeting at
which time the same is passed and adopted; and shall, within
fifteen (15) days after the passage and adoption thereof, cause the
same to be published in the Chula vista star News, a newspaper of
general circulation, published and circulated in said City and
which is hereby designate for that purpose.
Robert A. Leiter, Director of
Planning
a"~o bYi:(
Presented by
Bruce M. Boogaard,
Attorney
y
F:\home\attomey\adultbus.mor
1.
~-5
Revised, Item No. 6
ORDINANCE NO. 2558
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA' IMPOSING, AS AN INTERIM AND
URGENCY MEASURE, A MORATORIUM ON THE ISSUANCE
OF LAND USE PERMITS, INCLUDING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMITS, FOR USE OF LAND AS AN ADULT-ORIENTED
RECREATION BUSINESS FOR A PERIOD OF NINETY
(90) DAYS EXCEPT THAT APPLICATIONS FOR. AND
PROCESSING OF. SUCH USE PERMITS MAY BE ALLOWED
UPON CONSENT OF COUNCIL.
The City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby
ordain as follows:
SECTION I: There is hereby established an interim
moratorium, for the term herein specified, on the application for,
processinq. or issuance of any zoning, rezoning, land use permits,
conditional use permits, variances and building permits
(collectively "Permits") for Adult-oriented Recreation Businesses
as the term is defined in the City of Chula Vista Municipal Code,
and specifically at Section 19.58.024, within the city of Chula
Vista, except that an application for or processinq of such
Permits, not the issuance of Permits, may be allowed upon
application to, and approval by the city Council, on a showing of
hardship, and then only by written resolution of the city Council
permitting such application and/or processing, and on such
conditions as the city Council shall deem just. Nothing herein
shall be construed to allow the issuance of Permits during the
pendency of this moratorium.
SECTION II: In the event that the City Council grants
permission to file an application for, or processing of, Permits
during the pendency of this moratorium, it shall impose as a
minimum condition of said permission, among such other conditions
it deems appropriate, that if any Permit is eventually granted, the
Permittee shall comply with, and the City shall have the right to
impose on such Permit retroactively all criteria, including siting
criteria, established in the City'S Municipal Code as may, from
time to time, be amended and specifically as may be amended as a
result of the study hereinbelow ordered by the City Council.
~/7
SECTION III: That said moratorium shall remain in effect
for a period of ninety (90) daysl from the date of adoption hereof
unless otherwise subsequently extended or terminated by ordinance.
SECTION IV: The city Planning Commission and the City
staff are hereby directed to commence a study of Adult-Oriented
Recreation Businesses for the purpose of determining whether or not
our Municipal Code, with regard to such uses, should be amended to
redefine the locational requirements, determine whether the use
should be permitted as a right or "on conditions" and if so, in
which zones of the City, and determine which if any conditions
should be imposed as a matter of course or on a case-by-case basis
upon such uses. The Commission and sStaff saoula are also directed
to study in which zones of the City the use should be allowed or
constrained or if such uses should be required to be placed in
other and different zones from that which is currently allowed.
The study shall also evaluate the impact of other cities' zoning
ordinance on a regional or subregional basis for the purpose of
determining what impact other cities' zoning ordinance may cause
the relocation of such uses to be directed to areas within the city
of Chula vista. Specificallv. the studY should determine the
impact of such uses on existinq and future surroundinq development.
and the consequent environmental impacts that any chanqes in
development patterns may have on that portion of the citv in which
uses may be allowed.
SECTION v: The staff is hereby directed to prepare, on
behalf of the City Council, a written report describing the
measures taken to alleviate the condition which led to the adoption
of this ordinance, and to file same in the office of the City Clerk
ten (10) days prior to the expiration hereof.
SECTION VI: This ordinance affects public safety,
health, and welfare of the City of Chula vista and its inhabitants
and therefore shall take full force and effect immediately upon
final passage and adoption thereof. The facts establishing
emergency are as follows:
1. Recent case law has seeR issued permitting cities to
establish new and different locational requirements on Adul t-
Oriented Businesses and the City believes that this ~Iill ~have
an impact on the relocation of such businesses within the subregion
of Saouth San Diego County and, therefore, may result in an
overconcentration of such businesses within the City of Chula Vista
if the City of Chula vista fails to aaopt timelY review their
existinq eeRstit~tioRally permissiele zoning restrictions
eomparaele in comparison to the restrictions of other jurisdictions
lThis is the maximum time permitted for the first moratorium
under S19.12.130.
~
,.
o - ,y
within the
development
South Bay. and to study
on surroundinq land uses.
the
impact
of
such
use
2. The City finds such uses to have certain significant,
adverse social consequences despite the extent to which their right
to exist may be protected by the First Amendment and such adverse
social consequences require regulation as to time, place and manner
in a way that is not adequately addressed under our current zoning
scheme.
3. Such adverse social impacts of such uses IDSY-include,
but are not necessarilY limited to, the concentration of criminal
activity; the tendency to promote an attitude of degradation
aRd:eF~ subjugation. discrimination or harassment of women in our
society and in our immediate communi tv: a limitation on commercial
or other land use development: bliqhted urban development.
4. The City finds that there are some uses of property
such as Adult-oriented Recreation Businesses, which have
operational characteristics which have historically produced or
augmented the economic, physical and social decline of adjacent
areas where they have been ineffectively regulated.
5. The implementation of the results of the study are
necessary to supplement .existing regulation of Adult-oriented
Recreation Businesses and that without such modification the
health, safety and welfare of the city's residents would be
compromised.
6. The City has. as part of the 1992-93 budqet. budqeted
and planned to enqaqe in a land use and feasibility studY of Main
Street due to its location as the entry way to the recentlY adopted
Southwest Redevelopment Area. The city has received an application
for an Adult Oriented Recreation Business which. if issued. could
make the results of this planninq and zonina effort moot. and could
have the effect of deterioratinq a commercial entry way to the
city.
SECTION VII: The city Council is mindful that certain
Adult-oriented Recreation Businesses have been recoqnized as
involvinq constitutional lv-protected expressions. and as such urqes
staff and the Commission. in conductinq their study and formulatinq
their recommendations for further Council consideration. to
specifically identify leqitimate aovernmental interests that may be
adverselY affected bv such uses. and to do so without reqard to the
content of the expression. to formulate proposals that are not
overbroad in their reach. and to permit reasonable avenues for such
communication within the City.
SECTION VIII: The City Clerk shall certify to the
passage and adoption of this Ordinance by a vote of at least four-
fifths of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista pursuant to
.1
6--{1
Charter section 311(d); shall cause the same to be entered in the
book of original ordinances of said city; shall make a minute of
the passage and adoption thereof in the records of the proceedings
of the City Council of said City in the minutes of the meeting at
which time the same is passed and adopted; and shall, within
fifteen (15) days after the passage and adoption thereof, cause the
same to be published in the Chula Vista star News, a newspaper of
general circulation, published and circulated in said City and
which is hereby designate for that purpose.
Presented by
al
Robert A. Leiter, Director of
Planning
F:\home\anomey\adltbusl.mor
.4.
I~~ ... Ie
May 18, 1993
MEMO TO:
Honorable Mayor & City Council
~
Joyce Hughes, Secretary (Temporary) ~
ADULT - ORIENTED BUSINESSES
FROM:
SUBJECT:
On 5/17/93 the Council offices received phone calls from the following individuals
opposed to any Adult-Oriented businesses in the City of Chula Vista.
Francyne Wheeter
476-1128
Linda Bigboy
No phone number given
Mary Tietz
531-5935
Rebecca Hawkins
1640 Maple Dr. #22, CV 91911
Tim Welsh
662-1488
jih
51893
cc: City Manager
Planning Director
c:\memo\Adu~
t / II
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
ITEM TITLE:
Ite~?
Meeting Date ~ \~~ '3
PUBLlC~NG: PCZ-93-F- Consideration to prezone 1.05 acres
locatedA~t-::l045 Palm Drive to Residential Estate (RE)- Chia Chen and
_.' ,
Chu~ Chu.
} '6~inance ~S5?Approving PCZ-93-F
>-'
SUBMIsmD BY:
:\, '-.'
REViEWED BY:
\- _.~
.~ 1
~-', .! /j/
Director of Planning //i
,,;:1L---
(;< .
City Manager o~ '"
h'
(4/5ths Vote: Yes_No"X)
The proposal involves the prezoning of an existing 1.05 acre vacant parcel located at 4045 Palm
Drive to the City's Residential Estate (RE) zone to facilitate construction of a single family
residence through provision of City sewer service. The site is presently zoned County Rural
Residential (RR1).
The Environmental Review Coordinator conducted an Initial Study (IS-93-15), and based on the
attached Mitigated Negative Declaration and Addendum, has concluded that there would be no
significant environmental impacts created by this proposed prezoning, and recommends adoption
of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Addendum on IS-93-15.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council
1. Adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration Addendum prepared under 15-93-15.
2.
Introduce for first reading ordinance
approving PCZ-93-F.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION:
On April 21, 1993, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on and voted 6-0 (1 absent)
to recommend that Council approve the request in accordance with resolution PCZ-93-F
(Planning Commission minutes attached).
DISCUSSION:
The subject property is one of the last remaining in-fill lots in an area developed with single
family detached custom homes. The land uses to the north and west of the property are single
family dwellings, with open space to the south and east, and single family dwellings beyond (see
1--1
~
Page 2, Item /7
Meeting Date 5/11/93
Exhibit A).
The applicant desires to build a single family dwelling on the site, and could theoretically do so
under existing County zoning. However, the site's steep topography is not conducive to a septic
system thereby necessitating connection to the City sewer. A City sewer exists in Palm Drive
and is already serving some of the homes in the immediate vicinity, and can be extended to
serve this property. The City's Sewer Policy (570-02) provides for such extensions and requires
annexation where such is feasible, as in this instance. The property owner has agreed to the
terms of the Policy, and is processing an annexation request with LAFCO. LAFCO policy
requires the City to prezone the subject property prior to annexation.
FINDINGS:
The proposed "RE" prezoning is consistent with the City of Chula Vista General Plan
designation of Low Density Residential (0-3 du/acre), and the surrounding zoning and land use
context. Public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice also support
the prezoning to the Residential Estate (RE) zone.
FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable
(F: \home\pJanning \pcz93f .cag)
7-:2.
J 7-;1..
)I LJ' \~q1 S("CO;\'D
"oJ"'.If L ~ , ") r,.... ') t?C,q
YJf 7 ORDINANCE r-,!>':;; / D/I\1Q 41\1D
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA 4DO,oJ;
VISTA PREZONING 1.05 ACRES LOCATED AT 4045 PALM DRIVE TO . lOJt
THE RESIDENTIAL ESTATE ("RE") ZONE, AND MAKING NECESSARY
FINDINGS.
WHEREAS, the subject property located at 4045 Palm Drive and conslstmg of
approximately 1.05 acres ("Property") is currently within the County of San Diego and proposed
for annexation to Chula Vista; and,
WHEREAS, the subject prezoning is requested in conjunction with the proposed
construction of a single family residence on said property; and,
WHEREAS, due to conditions on the property adverse to a septic system, construction
of that residence requires the provision of sewer service from the City of Chula Vista; and,
WHEREAS, pursuant to City Sewer Policy 570-02 the extension of sewer service
requires annexation where such is feasible, as in this instance; and,
WHEREAS, the property is currently owned by Chia Chen and Chuang Chu, who have
consented to the annexation of the property to the City of Chula Vista; and,
WHEREAS, a duly verified application for prezoning was filed with the Planning
Department of the City of Chula Vista on December 9, 1992; and,
WHEREAS, the prezoning of said property is required by the Local Agency Formation
Commission prior to the annexation of the property to the City; and,
WHEREAS, it has been determined that the proposed prezoning will not have a
substantial negative effect on the environment, and the City's Environmental Review Coordinator
has issued a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Addendum under IS-93-15; and,
WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was held by the Planning Commission was
held on April 21, 1993, and from the facts presented the Planning Commission has determined
that the prezoning is consistent with the City of Chula Vista General Plan, and that public
necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice support the prezoning to RE;
and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission by a vote of 6 to 0 (1 absent) recommended that
the City Council approve this application.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista does hereby find, determine, and ordain as follows:
SECTION I.
That the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Addendum under IS-93-15
7-3
4 7~:J
Ordinance No. .25'5'7
Page 2
which was prepared I accordance with the provisions of CEQA, the guidelines promulgated
thereunder, and the Ci of Chula Vista Environmental Review Procedures, is hereby adopted.
SECTION II. Th the proposed prezoning is consistent with the City General Plan, and
that public necessity, co wenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice support the
prezoning to City's Reside ial Estate ("RE") zone.
SECTION III. That the oning map or maps established by Section 19.18.010 of the
Chula Vista Municipal Code are ereby amended to prezone the property Residential Estate, to
wit: RE, as reflected on Exhibit attached hereto and made a part hereof (exhibit A omitted),
to become effective only upon ann ation of the property to the City of Chula Vista.
Approved as to form by
Presented by
Robert A. Leiter
Director of Planning
Bruce . oogaard
City Attorn
7-7
/7.'1
Ordinance No. ~.5' 5')
Page 3
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City ofChula Vista,
California, this 11th day of May, 1993, by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers:
NOES: Councilmembers:
ABSENT: Councilmembers:
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers:
Tim Nader, Mayor
ATTEST:
Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ss.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA)
I, Beverly A. Authlet, City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista, California, do hereby certify that
the foregoing Ordinance No.
had its first reading on May 11, 1993, and its second reading and adoption at a regular meeting
of said City Council held on May 18, 1993.
Executed this 18th day of May, 1993.
Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk
(F : \home\planning\pcz93 fee. ord)
7-S'
175
(
TInS PAGE BlANK
7-6
/7"t,
LAKES
PCZ-93-30
EXISTING ZONING
AND LAND USE
Reque~t for prezoning of 1.05 acres to the City's "Residential
- Estate (RE) zone for a proposed residence located at 4045 Palm Drive
CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPT.-ADVANCE DIV. 4/5/93 C.RUIZ
I
o
FEET
t
7-7
. EXHIBIT" A"
I
400'
I
!
,
,
,
,/ ,
,/ . . ,
, ,
, I
, ,
,," I
'.., I
I ~...... /
! ....'"
i .....
,
/
//
/,./
//
'/
~
'/
'0,
I
I
I
......
....
....
......
......
......
..........
......
......
.
-~
IIORTH
c... No .~Z"'3-F
AcrMge: ".05
Scale: ,,- 100'
o.te: 4/13/83
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT THIS ZONING MAP
WAS APPROVED AS A PART OF ORDINANCE
8Y THE CITY COUNCIL ON
City Cl.-t<
..t.
Dr.", Iy:
Checked By:
e.J.F.
ZONING MAP -
EXHIBIT "B"
...
EXCERPT FROM DRAFT PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF 4/21/93
. ITEM 2.
PUBLIC HEARING: PCZ-93-F, APPLICATION FOR PREZONING 1.05
ACRES AT 4045 PALM DRIVE TO THE CITY'S RESIDENTIAL ESTATE
(RE) ZONE - Chia Chen and Chuang Chu (owners)
Principal Planner Griffin presented the staff report, stating that the property owner wished to
annex to the City of Chula Vista in order to obtain sewer service. In order to annex to the City,
it was necessary that the property be prezoned to be compatible with surrounding uses. The
density would conform with County zoning.
This being the time and the place as advertised, the public hearing was opened. No one wishing
to speak, the public hearing was closed.
MSUC (Martin/Carson) 6-0 (Commissioner Tuchscher excused) to approve the Planning
Commission resolution PCZ-93-F finding that, based on the Mitigated Negative Declaration
and Addendum prepared under 15-93-15, the project will not a have a significant
environmental impact and adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Addendum
prepared under 15-93-15; and recommending that the City Council adopt the Mitigated
Negative Declaration and Addendum prepared under IS-93-15; and that the City Council
introduce for first reading the draft ordinance prezoning 1.05 acres located at 4045 Palm
Drive to the Residential Estate (RE) zone, and making necessary findings.
7-9
17-i
7
1
,
TIllS PAGE BlANK
"/-{O
/7 It)
, ,
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
ITEM TITLE:
Item <f
Meeting Date 05/18/93
Resolution: 171/e' Accepting the Donation of Travel
Expenses to Attend Southwest Regional Environmental Dialogue
Project in Sedona, Arizona, June 14 and 15, 1993
Assistant City Manager~
. .~
City Manager ~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes___No~)
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
San Diego Gas and Electric will be participating in a meeting cosponsored by
Edison Electric Institute and Arizona Public Service Company in Sedona on June
14 and 15, 1993. This conference will focus on environmental issues of regional
interest, and the participating agencies have been requested to invite
representatives of environmental or governmental entities to attend, with travel
expenses being covered by the utilities.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Council adopt resolution accepting the donation of travel
expenses, and authorize the City Manager to appoint a designee
to attend the Southwest Regional Environmental Dialogue
Project.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS
RECOMMENDATION: N.A.
DISCUSSION:
The meeting will focus primarily on issues and ideas of interest or concern to
the Southwestern area of the country. The objective of the meeting is to support
constructive dialogue among utilities and representatives from environmental
organ i zat ions and governmenta 1 ent i ties, in order to discuss the needs and
interests of all in attendance, not just the utility industry. This will provide
an opportunity for the City to offer important input on environmental issues
affecting our region. It would be appropriate for the City's Environmental
Resource Manager to represent Chula Vista at this meeting.
FISCAL IMPACT:
N.A.
9-/
RESOLUTION NO.
J711~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING THE DONATION OF TRAVEL
EXPENSES TO ATTEND SOUTHWEST REGIONAL
ENVIRONMENTAL DIALOGUE PROJECT IN SEDONA,
ARIZONA, JUNE 14 AND 15, 1993
WHEREAS, San Diego Gas and Electric will be participating
in a meeting cosponsored by Edison Electric Institute and Arizona
Public Service company in Sedona on June 14 and 15, 1993; and
WHEREAS, this conference will focus on environmental
issues of regional interest, and the participating agencies have
been requested to invite representatives of environmental or
governmental entities to attend, with travel expenses being covered
by the utilities; and
WHEREAS, it would be appropriate for the city's
Environmental Resource Manager to represent Chula vista at this
meeting.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the city of Chula vista does hereby accept the donation of travel
expenses to attend Southwest Regional Environmental Dialogue
Project in Sedona, Arizona, June 14 and 1~ 1993.
Presented by AP~;
L\~ u~
"Bruce M. Boogaar
Q
M'~ !.
John Goss, City Manager
orney
F: \home\attomey\sedooa
9-,2,
sollf San Diego Gas & Electric
436 '"H" STREET. CHULA VISTA. CA 91910.4308
May 7, 1993 FILE NO
John Goss, City Manager
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Dea~~T I
SDG&E will be participating in the Southwest Regional Environmental Dialogue
Project in Sedona, Arizona, June 14th and 15th, 1993. The meeting is being co-
sponsored by Edison Electric Institute (EEl) and Arizona Public Service Company
(APS). It will focus on environmental issues of regional interest to the utility and
environmental communities. I am attaching some of the details of the meeting for you.
The participating utilities have been asked to invite representatives of key interest
groups and cover the costs of their travel expenses. Representatives from
environmental or governmental entities were suggested for participation in this
dialogue.
By this letter, San Diego Gas & Electric would like to invite an environmental
representative from the City of Chula Vista to attend this meeting. We understand it is
council policy to review such requests.
We look forward to your response.
+J
Patricia Barnes
Governmental Affairs Representative
South Bay District Office
(619) 482-3352
PB:jss
Enclosures
?'J
A written summary of dialogue proceedings to be shared with participanLS as a record of
these events.
Establishment o[ an on-going mechanism [or communication among participants
including initiation of a "network" for cooperation to address future problems or critical
issue:; as they arise. '
Initiation of pla;,nL."lg for future meetings localized by state to further explore the issues
addressed by the regional dialogue meetings, and
A specific set of action items related to the issues discussed at the meeting to be
undertaken by Ole meeting participants at the regional level.
Proposed Participation: EET's Consumer Affairs Committee identified a range of directly
affected parties who should be involved in this proJect. Potential participants include: .
representatives of the utility community within a gAven geographic region, representatives of the
environmental community, and potential representation from rcleva."lt state a.'1d federal regulatory
agencies. Emphasis will be plAccd upon representation by regional or local agencies and
environmental groups to property focus tbis regionally based discussion. Participation in this
meeting is limited to 20 people. EEl and APS wm work closely with participating utility
companies lO decide upon individual participation.
11RY-06-13S3 13: 30 ""UI']
IU
OMr,I~c.-:;.
SOUTHWEST REGIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL DIALOGUE PROJECT
The Project: The Regional Environmental Dialogue PI'oject has becn initiated by the Consumer
Affairs Committee of EEl. The Southwest Dialogue meeting Is being co-sponsored by EEl and
Arizona Public Service Company CAPS), It focuses em envi;onmental issues of regional i.."lterest
to the utility community and to the environmental community.
Project Objectives: The specific objectives identified by EEl's Consumer Affairs Committee
for this project includc:
Establishing a better working relationship \\ith the environmental community localiy,
regionally, and nationaliy;
Fostering an improved understa.."lding among uie parties regarding each other's goals and
objectives on specific environmental issues;
Defining specific ways to work together on environmental issues - based on shared
concemslissues rather than confrontation; and
Establishins: spedfic information shaD-ng mechanisms among participants on key
environmental issues that have interstate implications~
Propored Outcomes: The types of outcomes or results anticipated Lrl L'Jis project include but are
not limited to:
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
M:;a.nning fo[" the Project: This project ha.~ been conceived as a coilaborative planning process
involving all the t'articipating parties. The project necessarily involves the acuve participation of
the co-hosts. APS and EEl will work with a meeting facilitator to begin building a draft agenda
for the regional meeting. Once the basic parameters of the meeting have been agreed u/?on, the
facilitator will communicate directly with other meeting participants to seek their eady mput in
the agenda-building process.
Following lhis phase of collaborative planning, the facilitator will re-submit a proposed final
agenda for the consideration of all meeting participants incorporating the ideas and suggeSlions
of the meeting participants. This agenda wHl define the issues (0 be discussed, proposed format
for the meetL"lg and related meeting planning information.
Cj-~
1'1A'(-86-19'33 13; 29 FROM
TO
BRR~IES
pla~~~ng fo~ the proje~t: This project has been conceiveo as a
collaborative planning process involving ~ll the participating
parties. The project necessarily involves the active
.participatiOn of the co-hosts. Arizona power and EEl will ~ork
with a meeting facilitator to begin building a draft agenda for
the regional meeting. Once the basic par~meters of the roeeting
have been agreed upon, a draft agenda will be circulated for
comment to participating utilities. After utility comments have
been incorporateo, the facilitator will cOw~unica~e directly with
other meeting participants to seek their early input in the agenda-
building process as well.
Following this phase ot collaborative planning, the facilitator
will re-submit a proposed final agertda for the consideration of
EEl and the host utility which incorporates the ideas and
suggestions of the full range of meeting participants. This
ag~nda will define the issues to be disc~ssed, proposed formr-t for
the me~ting, and related meeting planning information.
Co-Host and Partioipating o~ilities' Responsibilitiee;
EE!;
Facilitator support for meeting planning, facilita~ion
support for the meeting itself, drafting of the final
report.
Hoat~
Facilities logistics planning, covering the costs fo:::
all participants of meals and lodging during the
meetin<;,
P2rtici~atincr utilities:
companies that participate with uS
in this proj~ct will oe asked to
identifY key in~e~est group
renresentatives who should be
lnvited, to cover the costs of their
companv and ~nterest group
reprp~~nta~ives' travel exoenses to
~ m9~~~~g location, and to provide
~nput into the agenaa development
for this meeting.
what do We Need from You? We need your response to this
invitation no later than March 5, 1993 in order to move forward
with meeting pla~Jling. In addition, we need the name of a company
contact/participant for this project at the earliest possible time
to ensure your company's input into our meeting planning
activities.
;
?,. ..5'
ITEM TITLE:
A.
B.
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item / t:J
Meeting Date 5/18/93
R 1. I '? I /fj h .. th .. d d'
eso uhon aut onzmg e appropnahon an expen Iture
of funds: 1) received through a grant from the State Office of
Traffic Safety ($13,000); 2) received from the Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) for General Fund expenses incurred
during the civil unrest of May, 1992 ($17,000); and, 3) deposited
into Fund 218, Asset Seizure ($6,150) to purchase and equip a
mobile emergency command post.
Resolution 17/.;RthoriZing the submittal of a grant application
to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to
provide matching funds to offset costs paid by Fund 218, Asset
Seizure, related to the purchase of communications equipment for
a mobile emergency command post.
Chief of Police ~
Fire Chief,i>tf' . ...
. . ~\\
City Manager~ ~6 /v
(4/5th's Vote: Yes.x.. No->
This item will enable staff to proceed with the development of a mobile emergency command
post (MECP). The proposed MECP will provide the Police and Fire Departments with a fully-
functional, state-of-the-art equipped, mobile command and communications station. The MECP
will be used to command field operations during critical incidents, natural disasters, sobriety
checkpoints, and to meet community policing needs. Additionally, the MECP will be used at
community events and, in conjunction with the Police Department's recently completed "hot-
rod", as a applicant recruiting device. The proposed funding includes a state Office of Traffic
Safety Grant (OTS), Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) matching funds and the
expenditure of reimbursements received in conjunction with the City's response to the civil
unrest which occurred in Los Angeles last May.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: None
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council approve both Resolutions.
DISCUSSION:
The Police and Fire Departments became aware of a statewide grant program known as the
"Roadside Sobriety Checkpoint Program" earlier this fiscal year. Sobriety Checkpoint Grant
program funding was made available to qualifying Police and Sheriff's Departments to reduce
the incidence of drunk driving and DUI related crashes. The Chula Vista Police Department
It?'" /
Page 2, Item
/tJ
Meeting Date 5/18/93
applied for and received a $13,000 "Roadside Sobriety Checkpoint Program" grant through the
State of California Office of Traffic Safety (OTS) in October, 1992. The grant authorizes the
purchase of a sobriety checkpoint trailer for $11,000 and $2,000 for related public information
and educational materials. The grant requires one roadside sobriety checkpoint per calendar
month for a one year period. The Police Department will continue to use the trailer for sobriety
checkpoints after the grant period has expired.
During the grant application process, authorization was obtained from the OTS to combine any
funds received through the grant program with other funds to enhance the original proposal.
Based upon this authorization, Police and Fire staff developed the specifications for the MECP.
The only restriction is that the MECP fulfill the "one roadside sobriety checkpoint per calendar
month for a one year period" condition as contained in the original grant requirements. The
MECP can and will be used to conduct roadside sobriety checkpoints on a regular and on-going
basis that meet all applicable OTS requirements. By combining these two functions into a single
unit, the Police Department can satisfy two pressing needs.
The proposed MECP is a custom equipped 24' x 8' trailer with a tandem axle. The trailer will
be designed and equipped to function in its dual role as a mobile command post and sobriety
checkpoint trailer. The trailer will have a 110 volt power system and 7 KW gas operated
generator. Exterior facilities will include stationary and retractable lighting systems, swing-up
rear doors and windows, two side-doors, and a 20' awning. The interior of the trailer will have
indoor/outdoor carpet, a self-contained restroom, a fully enclosed command room and will be
air-conditioned and is designed to maximize counter and storage space as well. A variety of
supplies will be required including maps, map boards, flashlight and radio charging equipment,
DUI CheckPoint signage and other miscellaneous supplies. The trailer, associated power
equipment, interior and exterior appointments, and supplies as specified will cost approximately
$21,850. The trailer will also be equipped with state-of-the-art radio gear and dispatch
equipment. The trailer will be designed, and the dispatch equipment will be oriented, in a
manner that will create a fully-functional, mobile, three position police, fire and emergency
medical service dispatch center. Dispatch originating from the MECP will not be significantly
different than dispatch originating from the dispatch center in the Police Department. The
specified communications equipment will cost approximately $12,300. The trailer,
communications equipment, and miscellaneous support items, at a total cost of $36,150, are
required to ensure the facility will be capable of functioning as an effective mobile emergency
command post.
The proposed MECP will provide the Police and Fire Departments will a fully-functional, state-
of-the-art equipped, mobile command and communications station. The MECP will be used to
command field operations during critical incidents, natural disasters, sobriety checkpoints, and
to meet community policing needs. Additionally, the MECP will be used at community events
and, in conjunction with the Police Department's recently completed "hot-rod", as a applicant
recruiting device.
/tJ '-2.
Page 3, Item
/tJ
Meeting Date 5/18/93
The proposed MECP can be funded entirely through the following sources:
1. OTS "Sobriety Checkpoint" Grant Award $13,000.00
2. Los Angeles Civil Unrest Reimbursement $17,000.00
to General Fund
3. Fund 218 reimbursed by FEMA Grant $ 6,150.00
Total
$36,150.00
The grant from OTS has already been awarded to the City, reimbursement from the Los Angeles
civil unrest has already been received, and there is funding available in Fund 218.
The FEMA Grant is a "matching fund" type of award, therefore, the City will need to purchase
the $12,300 in communications equipment noted above, and described in the FEMA grant
application, then, subsequent to the grant's award, FEMA will reimburse the City for 50% of
the related costs ($6,150). Staff has had informal discussions with FEMA and State Office of
Emergency Services personnel and, based upon those conversations, is confident the grant
application will be approved. In order to minimize the impact to the General Fund as a result
of this project, staff recommends that $6,150 be allocated from Fund 218, Asset Seizure, to
provide 100% funding for the identified communications equipment. Resolution B includes
language to ensure that when the FEMA grant application is approved, the associated grant
award shall be used to reimburse Fund 218.
The total proposed MECP project is brought forward for Council's consideration at this time
because $30,000 of the $36,150 required to complete the proposed project is currently available
to be appropriated and expended. Should Council approve both proposed Resolutions, no
additional Council action will be required in order to complete the project.
FISCAL IMPACT: Appropriations totaling $36,150 from three sources will provide funding
for this project: $13,000 in OTS grant funding, $17,000 which was
reimbursed to the General Fund, from FEMA, for the costs related to
the 1992 Los Angeles civil unrest response, and $6,150 to be initially
funded from Fund 218 and be reimbursed via the FEMA Grant
(Resolution B of this item provides staff the appropriate authorization to
submit this application).
//l~J
RESOLUTION NO.
1?11'1
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING THE APPROPRIATION AND
EXPENDITURE OF FUNDS: 1) RECEIVED THROUGH A
GRANT FROM THE STATE OFFICE OF TRAFFIC SAFETY
($13,000); 2) RECEIVED FROM THE FEDERAL
EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT AGENCY (FEMA) FOR GENERAL
FUND EXPENSES INCURRED DURING THE CIVIL UNREST
OF MAY, 1992 ($17,000); AND 3) DEPOSITED INTO
FUND 218, ASSET SEIZURE ($6,150) TO PURCHASE
AND EQUIP A MOBILE EMERGENCY COMMAND POST
WHEREAS, the proposed mobile emergency command post
(MECP) will be used to command field operations during critical
incidents, natural disasters, sobriety checkpoints, and to meet
community policing needs; and
WHEREAS, the MECP can be funded entirely through the
following non-General Fund sources:
OTS "Sobriety Checkpoint" Grant Award
Los Angeles civil Unrest Reimbursement
Asset Seizure Net of FEMA Grant
Total
$13,000.00
$17,000.00
$ 6.150.00
$36,150.00
WHEREAS, the grant from OTS has already been awarded to
the city, reimbursement from the Los Angeles civil unrest has
already been received, and there is funding available in Fund 218;
and
WHEREAS, the FEMA Grant is a "matching fund" type of
award, therefore, the city will need to purchase the $12,300 in
communications equipment and subsequent to the grant's award, FEMA
will reimburse the City for 50% of the related costs ($6,150).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the city of Chula vista does hereby authorize the appropriation and
expenditure of funds received through a grant from the State Office
of Traffic Safety in the amount of $11,000 to Account 219-2190-5568
and in the amount of $2,000 to Account 219-2190-5398; $17,000
received from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for
General Fund expenses incurred during the civil unrest of May, 1992
in the amount of $17,000 to Account 1000-1020-5568 and $6,150 in
the Asset Seizure Fund 218 to Account 218..-2180-5568 tOlurchase and
equip a mobile emergency command post. // . ,I
Presented by Approv d as/ito do by
I'
.. '- f kl~
Rick Emerson, Chief of Police Boogaard,
F:\home\attomey\MECP .RsA
/~/1-/
RESOLUTION NO. / 71 ~ ~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING THE SUBMITTAL OF A
GRANT APPLICATION TO THE FEDERAL EMERGENCY
MANAGEMENT AGENCY (FEMA) TO PROVIDE MATCHING
FUNDS TO OFFSET COSTS PAID BY FUND 218, ASSET
SEIZURE, RELATED TO THE PURCHASE OF
COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT FOR A MOBILE
EMERGENCY COMMAND POST
WHEREAS, staff wishes to proceed with the development of
a mobile emergency command post (MECP) which will provide the
Police and Fire Departments with a fUlly-functional, state-of-the-
art equipped, mobile command and communications station; and
WHEREAS, the FEMA Grant is a "matching fund" type of
award; therefore, the City will need to purchase $12,300 in
communications equipment and, then, subsequent to the grant' s
award, FEMA will reimburse the city for 50% of the related costs
($6,150); and
WHEREAS, in order to ensure there is no General Fund
impact as a result of this project, staff recommends that $6,150 be
allocated from Fund 218, Asset Seizure, to provide 100% funding for
the identified communications equipment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city Council of
the city of Chula vista does hereby authorize the submittal of a
grant application to the Federal Emergency Management Agency to
provide matching funds for the City's expenditure of funds for the
purchase of communications equipment for a mobile emergency command
post.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED when the FEMA grant application is
approved, the associated grant award shall be used to reimburse
Fund 218.
Presented by
/-,
APJ?t"ov~d
~)~ll{A
')
fat by
f.{
/ \,
. \-:+o-ft-<
Boogaard~. l.t
(
fX-.Gu.<~
Rick Emerson, Chief of Police
ruce M.
Attorney
F: \home\attomey\MECP .RsB
.-.--
I/J{J'!
Item /1
Meeting Date 5/18/93
Resolution /7/.2.' Accepting bids and awarding contract to
Knox Electric Inc. for traffic signal installation at Third A venue and Anita
Street in the City of Chula Vista
Director of Public Work~
City Managet0<1 ~~~) (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No..K)
ITEM TITLE:
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND:
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
On April 28, 1993, the Director of Public Works received sealed bids from seven (7) electrical
contractors for the installation of traffic signals at Third Avenue and Anita Street.
The low bid of $53,035.34 was received from Knox Electric, Inc. The low bid is below the
Engineer's estimate of $59,880. Staff has reviewed the low bid and recommends awarding said
contract to Knox Electric, Inc. in the amount of $53,035.34.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council accept the bids and award the contract to Knox
Electric, Inc. in the amount of $53,035.34
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
The traffic signal installation at Third A venue and Anita Street was approved and funded in the
1992-93 Capital Improvement Project (CIP). The work to be done includes the installation of
traffic signal standards, loop detectors, controllers and other signal equipment necessary to affect
an 5-phase signalized intersection. A very important aspect of this construction is the introduction
of the Emergency Vehicle Pre-Emption (E.V.P.E.) System which is now being incorporated in
all new signal construction and is included with the project.
On April 28, 1993, the director of public works received bids from seven (7) qualified electrical
contractors and they are as follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Knox Electric, Inc.
M CR Electrical Contractors, Inc.
TCB Electric, Inc.
Trasig Corp.
Leros Electric, Inc.
Steiny & Co., Inc.
Southwest Signal Service
II" J
$53,035.34
$54,372.00
$54,899.00
$55,704.00
$57,735.00
$60,384.00
$62,623.50
Page 2, Item II
Meeting Date 5/18/93
Staff recommends that a contract be awarded to the low bid, Knox Electric Inc. Knox Electric
Inc. has previously performed satisfactory work for the City of Chula Vista.
Attached is a copy of the contractor's disclosure statement
ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS
The City's Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the work involved in this project
and determined that the project is exempt under Section 15302, Class 3 (new construction or
conversion of small structures or the location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or
structures).
FISCAL IMPACT:
The source of funding for this project is Traffic Signal Funds. No prevailing wage requirements
were necessary or a part of the bid documents. Compliance with Federal and State
minority/women owned business requirements was unapplicable on this project.
If the resolution is adopted, the following table represents the funding status of the project.
Funds Required for Construction
A. Contract Amount $53,035.34
B. Contingencies (approx., 10%) 5,303.66
Total Funds Required for Construction $58,339.00
Funds Available for Construction
A. TF-145 - Third Avenue and Anita Street $68,752.00
Total Funds Available for Construction $68,752.00
Mter construction, only routine City maintenance and energy costs will be required.
ZOIBR-053
WPC F:\home'engineet-agenda\conlractJrnx
042893
11'.2.
RESOLUTION NO.
J 7/,)./
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING
CONTRACT TO KNOX ELECTRIC INC. FOR TRAFFIC
SIGNAL INSTALLATION AT THIRD AVENUE AND ANITA
STREET IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
WHEREAS, on April 28, 1993, the Director of Public Works
received sealed bids from following seven (7) electrical
contractors for the installation of traffic signals at Third Avenue
and Anita street:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Knox Electric, Inc.
MCR Electrical Contractors, Inc.
TCE Electric, Inc.
Trasig corp.
Leros Electric, Inc.
steiny & Co., Inc.
Southwest signal Service
$53,035.34
$54,372.00
$54,899.00
$55,704.00
$57,735.00
$60,384.00
$62,623.50
WHEREAS, the low bid of $53,035.34 was received from Knox
Electric, Inc. which bid is below the Engineer's estimate of
$59,880; and
WHEREAS, staff has reviewed the low bid and recommends
awarding said contract to Knox Electric, Inc. in the amount of
$53,035.34.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the city of Chula vista does hereby accept said seven bids and does
hereby award the contract to Knox Electric, Inc. in the amount of
$53,035.34 for traffic signal installation at Third Avenue and
Anita Street in the city of Chula Vista, who has assured the City
that they are a licensed contractor in the State of California who
can produce an acceptable performance bond.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of
Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said
contract for an on behalf of the city of ula vis
Presented by
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
F:\home\sttomey\contract.knx
//..3
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
You are required to file a Statement of Disclosure of certain ownership or financial interests, payments, or campaign
contributions, on all matters which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council, Planning Commissior.
and all other official bodies. The following information must be disclosed:
1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the property which is the subject of the application or
the contract, e.g., owner, applicant, contractor, subcontractor, material supplier.
~k\-
2. If any person" identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all individuals
owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership interest in the partnership.
\-J \ I~
,
3. If any person" identified pursuant to (1) above is non-profit organization or a trust, list the names of any person
serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the trust.
0\~
\
4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of the City staff, Boards,
Commissions, Committees, and Council within the past twelve months? Yes_ No_ If yes, please indicate
personls): ~ I\-
5. Please identify each and every person, including any agents, employees, consultants, or independent contractors
who you have assigned to represent you before the City in this matter.
~I j.\
6.
Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggr~ contributed more than $1,000 to a Councilmember in
the current or preceding election period? Yes_ No If yes, state which Councilmemberls):
· · · (NOTE: Attach additional pages as necessa )...
-4 8 c/O
Date: -P' - 1 ::J
ignature of contractor/a
(
1/- i Print or type name of contractor/applicant
* Person is defined as: -Any individual, jim, co-parrnership,joint venture, associalion, $ociaJ club,jralemol organization, corporation, estate, tnul, receiver,
syndicau, this and any other county, ciry and counlry, ciry municipality, disln'cts, or other political subdivision, or any other group or combination acting
a-unil..
MEMORANDUM
May 3, 1993
File: BR-053
TO:
John Goss, City Manager
Bruce Boogaard, City Attorney
Lyman Christopher, Director of Finance
Beverly Authelet, City Clerk
Kenneth Goldkamp, Senior Civil Engineer
FROM:
John Lippitt, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT:
RESOLUTION - Accepting bids and awarding contract to Knox Electric, Inc. for traffic signal
installation at Third A venue and Anita Street at various locations in the City of Chula Vista
FINANCIAL STATEMENT
Funds Required for Construction
A. Contract Amount $53,035.34
B. Contingencies (approx., 10%) 5,303.66
Total Funds Required for Construction $58,339.00
Funds Available for Construction
A. TF-145 - Third Avenue and Anita Street $68,752.00
Total Funds Available for Construction $68,752.00
ZO/BR-053
WPC F:\home\engineer\agenda\contract.knx
042893
/1-">
," 51
" 0
,''f.-'' 51 \
,
I
51 I
"\.-" J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
"-
~
~
'IL[_,a.rTnOC1
~ i
~~
51
I
I~
I~
1 1
115
MAIN
MONTGOMERY 5T
~-
II
W
16
Ii=
'Vi
1-1
'"
1;0
\}\
I'l
~
.z
Y-,-
W
I-
<(
o
(;)
'Vl
-I
TRAFFIC SIGNAL
3RD AVENUE AND
INSTAllATION AT
ANITA STREET
____~__________.__________.___ _______.__ ____u_.___m____ ~.___.__
~
w
>
<(
w
z
-
~
o
z
<(
n::
m
D
SUPPLEMENTAL
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item: 1.2...
Meeting Date: 5/18/93
SUBMITTED BY:
Resolution J 'l J Ii r Approving an amendment to the Chula Vista
portion of the 1992-99 Regional Transportation Improvement Program
(RTIP) and authorizing its submittal to the San Diego Association of
Governments (SANDAG)
Director of Public Works ~
City Manager J~ ~~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes_NoX)
ITEM TITLE:
REVIEWED BY:
AMENDMENT OF RTIP PROGRAM
Agenda Item # 13 of the City Council Meeting on May 11, 1993 was continued to the meeting
of May 18, 1993 because of the lateness of hour at the May 11 meeting.
This continuance has provided an opportunity to modify a requested amount. The modification
is a change from $105,000 in Item 2, Fourth Avenue between Kittiwake Lane and Del Rey H.S.
to $131,000. Bids for this project have now been received and reviewed. A clearer picture of
the project costs indicates that the earlier sum of $105,000 was inadequate for completion of the
project. This revision results in the total of the Cost Estimate column changing to $23,746,400.
SMN;KY~174
F:ENGINEERING\AGENDA \RTIPSUBM.SUP
/.2. - J
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item /.2..
ITEM TITLE:
Meeting Date 5/18/93
Resolution I ? I P Y Approving an amendment to the Chula Vista
portion of the 1992-99 Regional Transportation Improvement Program
(RTIP) and authorizing its submittal to the San Diego Association of
Governments (SANDAG)
Director of Public wor~~ r
City Manager ~ 11SfJ,~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes_NoX)
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
On August 6, 1991, the Chula Vista City Council held a public hearing and passed a resolution
approving the 1992-99 Seven Year Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP). On
November 22, 1991, the SANDAG Board of Directors adopted the 1992-99 Regional
Transportation Improvement Program including the TransNet Program of Projects. The 1992-99
RTIP covers fiscal years 1993-99. On May 19, 1992, the Chula Vista City Council approved
a first amendment to the 1992-99 RTIP.
This is Chula Vista's second amendment to the 1992-99 RTIP and primarily concerns changes
for the second year of the 1992-99 RTIP (fiscal year 1994). However, changes to FY 1993
necessary to carry over projects or funds to FY 1994 will also be considered by the SANDAG
Board of Directors. Project or funding changes beyond Fiscal Year 1994 will be considered as
part of the development of the new 1994-2001 Regional Transportation Improvement Program.
SANDAG will be amending the 1992-99 RTIP in June 1993.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the resolution as stated above.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
The 1992-99 San Diego Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) is a seven-year
program of proposed major highway, arterial, transit, bikeway, and aviation projects.
Development and approval of the RTIP by the San Diego Association of Governments
(SANDAG) is a requirement for the continued receipt of State and Federal Transportation
Project funding. The "Proposition "A" TransNet Transportation Improvement Program
Ordinance and Expenditure Plan" requires that all proposed projects funded with Transnet funds
be included in the Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP). The Proposition "A"
Ordinance and expenditure plan states that the revenues generated by the sales tax measure will
be used solely for transportation improvement projects.
j.J. -.J-
Page 2, Item I ~
Meeting Date 5/18/93
Chula Vista's Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) was adopted by the City
Council on August 6, 1991. The adopted RTIP is consistent with the City's Capital
Improvement Program and originally included eight projects utilizing TransNet funds and
Federal Aid Urban (FAU) funds. Since the adoption of the RTIP, the FAU Program has been
abolished and replaced with ISTEA's Surface Transportation Program (STP). SANDAG and
Caltrans have developed a plan whereby Caltrans will exchange local agencies STP funds for
an equal amount of Caltrans Transnet funds. This exchange greatly assists the local agencies
who will no longer have to contend with Federal procedures in utilizing the exchanged Transnet
funds. Thus, both programs are now being considered together. On May 19, 1992, the Chula
Vista City Council amended the projects in the RTIP along with their corresponding estimated
costs as follows:
CURRENT TRANSNET PROGRAM
Programmed for
Street Section Cost Estimate Fiscal Year
Design Const.
1. Computer-aided design and drafting workstation $ 39,000 93 N/A
2. Broadway, between "I" and ilL" Streets 3,501,600 93 94
3. "L" Street between Mission and Nacion 452,000 94 94
A ven ues
4. Broadway between Naples and southerly City 1,760,700 94 95
limits
5. Main Street between Industrial and Hermosa 4,200,000 95 96
6. Main Street between Hermosa and Hilltop 5,900,000 96 97
7. Palomar Street between 1-5 and Industrial 854,000 97 97
8. "E" Street between 1-5 and Broadway 473,000 97 97
9. Main Street between Hilltop and I-80S 4,200,000 97 98
TOTAL $21,380,300
Approval of this resolution will constitute the second amendment to the 1992-99 RTIP. This
consists of the following:
1. Delete Project No. 3 - the reconstruction of L Street between Mission and Nacion
Avenues and replace with the Orange Avenue project adjacent to the new library site.
L Street is to be included in the overlay program in FY 1993-94.
2. The design of Project No.5 - Main Street between Industrial and Fourth Avenue is
proposed to be phased over two years (FY 1994 and FY 1995) and construction is to
remain at the originally scheduled year of FY 1996.
/,)<;
Page 3, Item I,)"
Meeting Date 5/18/93
3. Add a project for the widening and reconstruction of Orange A venue between Third and
Fourth Avenues along the proposed new library site. The total cost is estimated at
$412,600.
4. Add an engineering automation project for FY 1994. This new project will enable the
Engineering Division to obtain Transnet funds to finance the purchase of computer
equipment that will be used in the design and drafting of Transnet projects. The total
cost is $45,000.
5. Add the design phase of Broadway between Naples and Anita Streets estimated to cost
$230,500. This design cost was originally proposed to be funded with gas tax funds.
6. Add Phase 3 of the Otay Valley Road Project. The estimated total cost is $150,000.
7. Add Pavement Overlay Program Project for FY 1994. Gas Tax funds were not
adequate to fully support the needs of the Pavement Overlay Program. It is proposed
that in FY 1994, the City will utilize $908,650 in TransNet money to supplement the
pavement overlay program.
The following is the amended list of projects along with their corresponding estimated costs:
PROPOSED TRANSNET PROGRAM (INCLUDING ISTEA EXCHANGE FUNDS)
Programmed for
Street Section Cost Estimate Fiscal Year
Design Const.
1. Computer-aided Design and Drafting Workstation $39,000 FY 93 N/A
(Engineering Automation Program, Phase I)
2. Fourth A venue between Kittiwake Lane and Del Rey 131,000 94 FY 94
H.S.
3. Broadway, between "F" and "I" Streets 156,700 94 94
4. Broadway, between "I" and "L" Streets 3,501,600 93 94
5. Engineering Automation Program (Phase II) 45,000 94 N/A
6. Orange Avenue, between Fourth and Third Avenues 500,000 93 94
7. Pavement Overlay Program, FY 1993-94 1,796,100 94 94
8. Otay Valley Road. Phase III 150,000 94 94
9. Broadway between Naples and Anita Streets 1,800,000 94 95
10. Main Street, between Industrial and Fourth 4,200,000 94 96
11. Main Street, between Fourth and Hilltop 5,900,000 96 97
12. Palomar Street, between 1-5 and Industrial 854,000 97 97
13. "E" Street, between 1-5 and Broadway 473,000 97 97
14. Main Street, between Hilltop and 1-805 4.200,000 97 98
TOTAL $23,746,400
/.). ... 'I
Page 4, Item ),).,
Meeting Date 5/18/93
TransNet revenues totalling approximately $5,156,750 are estimated to be allocated to the City
of Chula Vista in FY 1994. Exhibit "A" (attached) shows further details on the amended list
of projects.
FISCAL IMPACT: A net increase in TransNet allocations to the City totalling $5,156,750
during FY 1994.
SMN:FileJKY-174
WPC F:\HOMEIENGINEER\AGENDA\RTIPSUBM.2
/.)-p /17."
RESOLUTION NO.
171PK"
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE
CHULA VISTA PORTION OF THE 1992-99 REGIONAL
TRANSPORTATION IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (RTIP) AND
AUTHORIZING ITS SUBMITTAL TO THE SAN DIEGO
ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (SANDAG)
WHEREAS, on August 6, 1991, the Chula Vista City Council
held a public hearing and passed a resolution approving the 1992-99
Seven Year Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP); and
WHEREAS, on November 22, 1991, the SANDAG Board of
Directors adopted the 1992-99 Regional Transportation Improvement
Program including the TransNet Program of Projects; and
WHEREAS, the 1992-99 RTIP covers fiscal years 1993-99 and
on May 19, 1992, the Chula vista City Council approved a first
amendment to the 1992-99 RTIP; and
WHEREAS, this is Chula vista's second amendment to the
1992-99 RTIP and primarily concerns changes for the second year of
the 1992-99 RTIP (fiscal year 1994), however, changes to FY 1993
necessary to carryover projects or funds to FY 1994 will also be
considered by the SANDAG Board of Directors.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula vista does hereby amend the Chula Vista portion
of the 1992-99 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP),
as set forth in Exhibit "A", and authorizes its submittal to the
San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG).
Presented by
Approved as to form by
Br:!.: ~~~y
Attorney
John Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
F:\home\atlomey\RTIP
/~~7 ///.-8
Exhibit "A"
SANDAG 1992-99 REGIONAL TIPIPROGRAM OF PROJECTS - FY94 AMENDMENTS
,:,:,:,::,::,:::,:,,:: ::::::~::: .;.:.:.,...;.".:.:.;.x<. '.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.~
..................................................w......,-."
.n...............
:':~:::::::::~:::::::::::::::::
..........................
..............................-...........
.jf!g~gQyQliliIlN~iilli.;;;
1 Engineering Automation Program, Phase I
(Previously Computer Aided Design and
Drafting (CADD) Workstation with G.I.S.
interface)
..-
~
...J)
3
4
Broadway, Between 'I' and 'L' Streets -
Widening and Reconstruction
5
Engineering Automation Program, Phase II
6
Orange Avenue, Between Fourth and
Third Avenues, Widening and
Reconstruction
Sheet 1 of 3
jj~f!~g$i~~tt~tr~jttt ...... ".
'fl"*tjll)tfA!ijmYq;1!t"*It~~!l!gr .IIIj!i~t
T
$39.0
2 Fourth Avenue, Kittiwake Lane to Chula 0.25
Vista Aduit School, Widening & Reconstruct.
Note: This is an additional request. This
project was inciuded in the previous RTlP.
Broadway, 'F' Street to 'i' Street, Widening 0.75
and Reconstruction
Note: This is an additional request. This
project was included in the previous RTIP.
C
131.0
C
156.7
0.75 E 531.6
C 2,970.0
T 3,501.6
T 45.0
CDSG GASTAX
0.25 E 87.4 50.0 37.4
C 412.6
T 500.0 50.0 37.4
Note: For Federal and State funding, identify funding programs assumed.
$39.0
131.0
156.7
531.6
2,970.0
3,501.6
45.0
412.6
412.6
PHASES: E [Engineering & Planning]; R [Right-Of-Way]; C [Construction]; T [Total]; 0 [Operations]; V [Vechicles/Equipment]
93
94
94
93
94
94
93
94
-
tv
I
(5
Exhibit "A"
SANDAG 1992-99 REGIONAL TIP/pROGRAM OF PROJEcrs - FY94 AMENDMENTS
':':':,:,:;:,:,:,:,:; ::::::::~: :::::::::::=::;:::::::::~:::::::::::~:':':':"".............. :::}:::::::::::::::::::::::~::~:::::::::: ............w............. -." .
......................................:.:.:.".:.:::::::::::::,':::::'::,:::::::::::,:::::,::::,,:::,':':::': ......................-.-
N~lii~;E~I~~e~~~MM.~II
7 Pavement Overlay Program, FY 1993-94,
Pavement Rehabilnation
8 Otay Valley Road, Phase III, Widening
9 Broadway, Between Naples and
Anna Streets - Widening and
Reconstruction
10 Main Street, Between Industrial and
Fourth Avenue - Widening and
Reconstruction
0.25
E $300.0
C 1,496.1
T 1,796.1
E 58.0
C 92.0
T 150.0
E 230.5
C 1,569.5
T 1,800.0
E 440.0
E 440.0
R 100.0
C 3,220.0
T 4,200.0
Sheet 2 of 3
IIH~Qi~$1!lI..................]Jtuu...;.;;;ii;..................
$~RAlii.~'tA'tS;~l$Il;aQ9~ .......... ......W(;..
GASTAX
$300.0
587.5
887.5
CDGB
11 Fourth Avenue, Between Chula Vista Adull 0.85 E 67.7
School and Orange Avenue C 1,757.3 1,757.3
T 1,825.0 1,757.3
12 Main Street, Between Fourth and Hilltop- 1.12 E 1,232.0
Widening and Reconstruction R 100.0
C 4,568.0
T 5,900.0
0.85
0.90
Note: For Federal and State funding, identify funding programs assumed.
908.6
908.6
94
94
58.0
92.0
150.0
94
94
230.5
1,569.5
1,800.0
94
95
440.0
440.0
100.0
3,220.0
4,200.0
94
95
95
96
67.7
94
95
67.7
1,232.0
100.0
4,568.0
5,900.0
96
97
97
PHASES: E [Engineering & Planning); R [Right-Of-Way]; C [Construction]; T [Total]; 0 [Operations]; V [Vechicles/Equipment]
Exhibit "A"
Sheet 3 01 3
SANDAG 1992-99 REGIONAL TlPIPROGRAM OF PROJECfS - FY94 AMENDMENTS
....w. ,';, ...............<.. ..:,.':",... :.:':ii:::" ,'iiiIIf ;ml'l~CllPP$l!1r...
;M!:lIljl_.~.N~IIMs!;$;I '.IM/;1IiilII. IIiti!WAlli .'.. fti!:i~f f$fAUl
13 Palomar Street, Between 1-5 and Industrial
Blvd. - Widening and Aeconstruction
0.25
14 "E" Street Aeconstruction, 1-5 to Broadway
0.37
-
15 Main Street, Between Hil~op Dr. and 1-805
Widening and Reconstruction
0.85
'"
I
-
-
E 100.0 100.0 97
A 400.0 400.0 97
C 354.0 354.0 97
T 854.0 854.0
E 73.0 73.0 97
C 400.0 400.0 97
T 473.0 473.0
E 875.0 875.0 97
A 100.0 100,0 98
C 3,225.0 3,225,0 98
T 4,200,0 4,200.0
Note: For Federal and State lunding, identify lunding programs assumed.
Phases: E [Engineering & Planning]; A [Aight-OIWay]; C [Construction]; T [Total]; 0 .[Operations]; V [Vechicles/Equipment)
TInS PAGE BlANK
/,). .. / .:l.
COUNCIL AGENDA
s...... 9"fq 3
~"... 1ftI"~
STATEMENT 'V '{-.- .
ITEM TITLE:
. Hemd!:>
Meeting Date-ro/'fJ;
Report: Petition from neighbors regarding parking problems with auto repair shop
at rear of 363 "E" Street (Referral No. 2735)
Director of Building anj ~ing~t:::
Director of Planning ~ f- ,.,. fl,A I.P'"
City Manager. (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No..KJ
(, Iv /(p
1:,J j
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND:
On March 2, 1993, the City Council considered a petition from surrounding residents regarding parking
and other problems associated with an auto repair shop located at the rear of 363 "E" Street. Staff was
directed to meet with the neighbors and business owners, review previous Council action on this issue, and
report back within 30 days.
On March 15, ] 993, a meeting was ~Id with the owners of the businesses at the rear of 363 "E" Street,
and on April I, 1993, a noticed meeting was held with these owners and surrounding residents and
business o"mers. Notices were mailed to 64 surrounding properties, and ]60 were hand delivered for
distribution at Chula Vista Inn which backs onto Glover Avenue. Two residents and six business owners
attended the meeting.
On April 6, 1993, Council was informed that a likely solution to the situation was currently under
discussion and, therefore, the report back to Council would be delayed. The sponsors of the petition have
been kept informed by staff of progress on this matter.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council accept the report and direct staff to monitor the effect of unifying
site operations and report back to Council no later than August I, 1993.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
PREVIOUS ACTION:
On June 30, 1992, Council directed staff to respond to complaints about the lack of on-street parking in
the 100 block of Glover A venue resulting from an auto repair shop at 363 "E" Street parking vehicles to
be repaired on Glover for an extended period of time. Staff met with area residents and business o"mers,
and suggested a combination of metered and resident-permit parking in order to address the problem.
The residents in attendance at that meeting were unanimously opposed to any parking restrictions on
Glover Avenue. They believed the auto repair business should be required to contain their parking on their
own property, not on adjoining streets or illegally in the alley. The residents also voiced concern with _
/3-1
~~"NN_C IN
FrJ".....
s--/l--q~
Page 2, Itemn
Meeting Date 5/11193
fumes from auto spray painting activities. The spray paint booth was in disrepair and some vehicles were
being painted outside the booth, which is illegal.
On October 20, 1992, Council accepted staffs recommendation that no changes be made to parking
restrictions on Glover Avenue, but tha' two additional "No Parking in Alley" signs be posted in the alley.
Council was informed that the Police epartrnent would continue to provide enforcement with regard to
illegal parking in the alley, and that C de Enforcement was working to correct the problem with spray
painting of automobiles.
Since that time, a new spray paint boot has been installed at a different onsite location, and adjacent
residents confirm that the problems with fumes and odors is largely resolved. Despite the posting of
additional "No Parking" signs, and stepped- enforcement by the Police Department, however, the parking
problems continue. These include: clients arking in the alley, employees parking on the street and in
a private lot of an adjoining business, and t parking and sometimes repair of customer vehicles in the
street.
DISCUSSION:
As a result of our meetings with surrounding resi nts and business owners, it is evident that the parking
problems are associated with J&L Auto Repair, w 'ch occupies the westerly most portion of the rear of
363 "E" Street. This portion of the property is separ ed from the balance of the site by a solid block war
and receives sole access from the alley. J&L Auto is a onth-to-month sub-lessee of Superior Auto Body,
which occupies the larger area to the east with access om Garrett Avenue (see attached site plan).
Apparently, at the close of the business day, J&L attempts store their customer vehicles within their site.
But in the morning, employee vehicles and vehicles to be r aired are parked on adjacent streets in order
to make room for work to occur within the small site. Occa nally customer vehicles are left overnight
or even repaired in the street.
Also, since there is no convenient space on-site to accommodate e imates, deliveries, pick-ups, etc., this
parking often occurs in the alley, which blocks access to the ap ents to the north, and which also
restricts movement by larger vehicles through the alley. Evidently th "No Parking" signs are routinely
ignored, and the neighbors are convinced that enforcement efforts, altho h appreciated, are futile.
These problems are all related to the fact that an area designed to be used fo repairs only -- accessory to
the balance of the larger portion of the site to the east -- is being used in pendently for a separate
business. It was never designed, intended or approved to be used in this f: . on. Although there is
nothing inherently wrong with an auto body and auto repair use sharing the same s e, both businesses need
to coordinate operations so that employee and customer parking, deliveries, and vehicle repair and storage
can be accomplished in an appropriate manner.
Part of the problem is the success of J&L Auto; they accept more business than can be accommodated on
their small site. But also, primary access should occur off Garrett Avenue, a public street, which presentl)
serves only the Superior Auto Body operation. This portion of the site not only has public street access,
but also has areas to accommodate employee and customer parking, estimates, deliveries, and so on.
/3-2-
Page 3, Hemn
Meeting Date 5/11/93
A suggestion has been made that J&L Auto be required to take access off "E" Street, through what is now
a parking lot for the restaurant which occupies the front portion of 363 "E" Street. The restaurant has
limited parking, however, and the owner is not interested in further reducing the number of spaces to share
access or parking with J&L. It was also generally agreed by the neighbors at the meeting that this
approach would simply transfer problems from the rear to the front of the site, whereby among other
things, circulation limitations would create conflicts with "E" Street traffic.
Superior Auto Body, which assumed the lease on the property last October, has been very cooperative and
is interested in solving the problems to the satisfaction of the neighbors. Since consolidating operations
with J&L Auto is apparently unacceptable to either business, Superior Auto Body has stated in the attached
letter that they intend to terminate the sublease with J&L Auto effective at the end of May. Superior
would then integrate the use of the westerly portion of the site with their overall operation.
Superior's proposal may not satisfy all of the concerns of the neighbors, at least one of whom would like
to see the alley access from the westerly portion of the site closed off permanently. According to the
Attorney's office, this may be an option available to the City, but necessitates creation of a vehicular
access drive through the solid wall which presently separates the two portions of the site. According to
Superior, this is part of their long term plans for the property, but is beyond their means at this point in
time. .
Staff is of the opinion that unifying site operations may resolve the problems and should be tested for a
period of perhaps 60 days following unification, with a report back to Council by August I, 1993, and
subject to the following additional requirements, which Superior has agreed to:
1. The westerly portion of the rear of 363 "E" Street shall be accessory to the balance of thc
site, and shall only be used by Superior Auto Body..
2. A sign shall be posted at the alley access point which indicates employees only, and which also
directs all customers and deliveries to the Garrett Avenue entrance.
It would be the intent of staff to monitor the success of these measures and, in cor",lltation with adjoining
neighbors, report back to Council by August I, 1993. If the problems persi.' '~e City could require
additional measures to be taken, including perhaps the option of closing the ai' access.
The residents and business owners who either spoke at the Council meeting or '.'nded the r, ..ighborhood
meeting have been notified that the Council will consider this report at the Ma) I I, 1993 meeting.
FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable.
Attachments
Site plan
Letter from Superior Auto Body
Petition
Council minutes (March 3, 1993 and October 22, 1992)
WPC F:\home\planning',865.93
.) 7- ::J
13- 3
I
I
-I
~ .
~l fence
&
~ate
I
I J & L
I Auto
Repair
I
I
~
J.
t~L
--
CBIOCk WAil
.
I
.
I
.
I
.
I
.
I
.
I
.
I
.
I
.
I
.
I
.
--
--
Alley
'.
Superior Auto Body
Los Chavos
Taco Shop
Los Chavos Taco Shop parkin\J lot
--
363 "E" ST
---z
-
"E" ST
I
I
-
I
I
~
>
-<
f-t
f-t
~
~
~
-<
~
N
~ l."
=-.-=
'l, ~..
.~---""'-'~-~'\
I' -; (' tr J)]' }" J ( J'
- - - I l..- , 'j ~ )
. "
I ---.
L . -.-..--:--:,
'~
"
{ \
"
, (
I
,
April 8, 1993
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
To All Parties Concerned,
We are submitting this letter in hopes of resolving the Business/Resident
discord concerning parking and traffic problems generated from 363 E Street.
After meeting with City Representatives, Neighbors, and area Business
Owners, It has become evident that Superior Auto Body, as principal tenants
at 363 E Street, must take immediate and conclusive action to maintain a
good relationship with the surrounding tenants.
We have stated that our ma~n concern over this issue is to satisfy both the
City of Chula Vista as well as the local Residents. We feel that the
complaints stemming from vehicle activity on or around J & L Automotive,
who rents a portion of building space at 363 E Street are at a point that
any resolution short of consolidating operations between Superior Auto Body
and J & L Automotive will be inadequate in the eyes of our neighbors as well
as the City of Chula Vista.
Since consolidation of Superior Auto Body and J & L is unacceptable to each
Owner, We propose to terminate our relationship with J & L Automotive, by
issuing a 30 day notice to vacate effective May 1, 1993. Although this will
cause a short term financial hardship for Superior Auto Body by eliminating
the rent factor collected from J & L Automotive, We are certain that this
change will result in the long term peaceful co-existence of everyone
involved. This is the only feasible resolution to this situation for our
business.
Thank You,
M-./ (09;U~
..) /' .5
I~-S-
RECEIVED
'93 FEB 24 All:45
... Mayor & C1ty Council
C1ty of Chula V1sta
276 F~~rth Avenue
CITY OF CHULA VIST A
CITY CLERK'S Or FieF
February 24. 1992.
Dear Mr. Mayor. Members of the City Counc1l:
En=losed please f1nd a pet1t1on
Sl-~er Ave.to solve a sltuat10n
:~~~~erable prctlem~ icr ~everal
:::y tu: others still prevaIl.
by a
that
g~'OUp of
has been
Some I<e1'e
ntizens froIT,
the source of
solved by the
yeal-S.
~~ t~e: that operat:n; an aut0 repaIr sho~ out of a narrow aIle)'
:= n~: l~ ~he best interest c,f the CJty and all of C~ who h3ve to
suffer the lnconvenlences ot such operat1on. We also feel that
the ~rc;erty at 363 E. St. 1S not adecuate to rent a sect10n as
It IE. and It 15 net confc,rmlng to ~atisfy the baslc needs of the
:e~~~:s 6~j ne1al;~'2rs.
~:;':~; tha: '.'2~ ~5Y be at:le to help us ~ith this petition. we
l~ <':<;.=. : ;, .
z:r;:erE-ly.
~~
~3l-:1~ T:~-~eE and ether resIdent e~ght'ors.
PE: Glover Ave.
~ I' f,~'"t. ! "f")~ 'f- '''.' ,
~'\' ~~1I ~ . ~::.~
"C'
c.. .
~~(i1
aK
~~~~
0. ';-f ~~/~
a;y4tf/~
-.). 7"" 13- J.
C01,,\N~UNiCA 1'IO~~S
~ p.;J9J
~ FEB 2_ 1993 ~
.uu
'-.
----.....--.
--...-..................... -----
I . ~€' I
. * * . . * . * . .
A PETITION
. . . . * * * . * .
If,e undersianed respectfullv request the city of Chula Vista to
. - . -
condemr, ad permanent 1 y close the north-west all ey access to thE-
property at 363 E street used by an auto-repair shop as thelr
maln entrance. (CoIn.'llon sense IndIcates that the entr'ance should
be at E Street). The pre.per entrance for this bussInes is from
Garrett Street. We also request thot the owner of thIS propert.y
provide the necessary parkIng facilities for the people employed
there. cust.omers and cars beIng repaIred.
At the councll's meetIncr of 10-20-92 It was dlsussed the parkIng
;:'r:~lems at Glc'ver Aveue and It was declded trlat Instolllng
;:'orl'.:r.g restrlctlons in this. orea would not sc.lve the ;:rc,tlem
~6:n:v because it IS INHERENT to thls type of business to have 0
contInuos flow c,f cars parklng in front for estImates. tow trucy.s
del:verlng cars. vans selllng tools etc.: therefore IS
;ra.:-tlco} ly lr.lpossible to enforce a no-parking reStrictlon. The
OWDE-r of ttlS properly 15 rentlng thlS spoce In dE-trlment of all
thE- resljer.ts of Glover Avenue. We can hardly pork our cars ot
G10vE-r Avenue becousE- It is always crowded wlth cars of pE-cple
t~E:t de nct live here end now it h~s deterloroted to the pOInt
t~,a: so~~e:lm~e some of theee care are left overnlgtl:.
;ne ~lgn~ postE-d by the city at the alley are tetolly dlreg~rded
for years we have been sufferlng wlth thlS problelli and other
~r:~leffi~ assoclated WIth thIS operation and very little has been
d:ne to allevlote thlS situotl~n. In spite of the fact thot a
dlllarldated paInt booth was removed. they paint cars In free
s;:,~:e pc'llutlng the air: nois.e pollution. hammer)ng mE-tals.
unnece~s~ry horn use. hlgh-power sound systems and lItterIng the
alley wlth trash still remains. An inspect)on at any time durlng
w~rkIng hour~ will reveal that cars are always parked in the
alley blocking the entrance to twelve apartments and maklng
d:ffucult for refuse trUCKS and other service vehicles to access
the area. rr,is locatlon is totally inadequate for auto repalr:
cars are sometlmes crowded like sardines inside this small space.
We slncerely hope that this time the city will hear our plea.
Chula Vista. CA. .January 29. 1993
Name.
Addr€>EE'
Slgnature
Dat~
M.5.rtin Torres
178 Glover
~~~
(
I q,'! 'Iollu ~.J.~
C-y 9/9/P-..<5IP ~7- /'
--
/-29-75
>( ~ el'\<. Wekt~f~
'2-'l~t13
1'3- 7
P~~e 2.
Pet1t10n to reque~t clo~ure of entrance in alley
.VAI"E
MiJ\?~S~
SI(,NA"i\lQe
;'-3 - '1-5
tv!. A. ~AL.bi
ArJti u,c.,Ri
---
-
llATE
-1/-93
"2-'1-"1)-
d-'$-95
~ -':") -s ~
-'1")
2-6-9";5
,2-?- X:3
.
;27 ~
13-g
b. Petition protesting auto repair shop at 363 "Eo Street - Martin Torres, 178 Glover, Chula Vista, CA
91910-2515, and Heinz Hemken, 183 Glover, Chula Vista, CA 91910.2515. It is recommended that staff
meet with the residents and return to Council with a recommendation. Pulled from the Consent Calendar.
Mayor Nader stated that staff recommended Council should refer this back to staff to meet with Mr. Torres.
His concern Was that this was not the first time Council has heard about this issue. He asked if staff had
a time line for conducting meetings with the neighborhood and getting a report back. Mr. Leiter stated staff
could report back to the Council within thirty days, and they could meet with Mr. Torres and the neighbors
prior to that.
. Heinz Hemken, 183 Glover Avenue, 91910, stated they had presented a request to close the entrance
on the alley to the property of 363 E Street where the automobile repair shop operates. The situation has
become very bad because of parking. This property does not have enough spaces to support three
businesses, two of which deal with automobiles.
Mayor Nader stated he knew this has been going on for a long time, but asked if another thirty days seem
unreasonable to him. Mr. Hemken responded it would be okay.
. Martin Torres, 178 Glover Avenue, 91910, stated he had called parking control because he could
not park in front of his own house. They came out, but ticketed everyone including the homeowners. He
stated the parking problem was serious.
MSUC (NaderlFoz) to refer to staff to meet with the neighbors, business owners, and all interested parties.
When item comes back to Council in thirty days, address concerns relating to hazardous waste, if any; and
provide information concerning prior Council actions.
Mayor Nader stated that any legal violation enforcement should not be delayed pending staff coming back
to Council; all legal violations should be dealt with at the time.
J 7 ~
13-1
MINUTES
March 2, 1993
Page 3
"......
Ii
Minutes
October 20, 1992
Page 9
18. REPORT PARXlNG CONa:RNS IN niE 100 BLOCK OF GLOVER AVENUE . AI the
6/30/92 meeting, staff was directed to respond to parking problems caused by business parking for extended
periods of time on the 100 block of Glover Avenue. Staff evaluated the request and met with area residents
to discuss alternatives available to improve on.street parking. Staff recommends acceptance of the report.
(Director of Public Works)
Heinz Hemken, 183 Glover Avenue, Chula Vista,.CA 91910, spoke in opposition to the staff recommendation.
He felt the proposal would make the situation worse and the other residents of the area shared his views.
He stated there was a problem with parking due to the business located at 363 "Eo Street. Other problems
were noise and air pollution and painting on the location. He requested that Council find an equitable
solution to the concerns of the neighborhoods.
Martin Torres, 178 Glover Avmue, Chula Vista, CA 91910, was not in attendance when called.
Councilman Moore stated he had reviewed the area and there were 26 vehicles on the site. He expressed
concern regarding emergency response to the property. He questioned whether the painting was being done
legally.
John Lippitt, Director of Public Works, stated that Code Enforcement was working with the owners. As of
10/9/92 there was a new owner, Superior Auto Body, and they were working with the Planning Department
in order to come up with a slllution to the concerns expressed. The staff recommendation was to not do
anything on Glover Avenue based on a meeting held with the property owners, monitor the situation, and
work on the Code violations with the property owner.
Councilman Moore stated if there were violations, warnings should be minimal and of a short time frame.
If they were spraying paint illegally it should be stopped immediately and if they continued to operate they
should be fined. He expressed his concern regarding the ability of emergency vehicles to respond due to
the number of vehicles on the property. He requested a memo from staff stating what was allowed on the
property.
Mayor Nader stated that staff had indicated they were finding illegally parked vehicles in the alley and were
citing them. He questioned if there was a legal reason that the area could not be posted so that illegally
parked vehicles could be towed and whether the City had an ordinance that required the business to provide
off.street parking for customers.
Mr. Lippitt responded that he was unaware of any reason that the area could not be posted.
Ken Larsen, Director of Building and Housing, responded that he did not have that information available.
The only access into the building was off of the alley way of Glover, there was not street access.
Mayor Nader stated that the Air Pollution Control District had regulations regarding painting and paint
booths and questioned whether residents in the area had been provided the numbers of who to contact at
APCD for air pollution enforcement. He also questioned whether City staff forwarded the complaints to
APCD for investigation.
Mr. Larsen responded that he was unaware as to whether the residents had been contacted by staff. The
maintenance of a spray booth was subject to frequent maintenance by the proprietor and staff had found
that the booth was in compliance. He did not believe that staff had contacted APCD.
MSC (Nadu/Moore) to accept the staff report; cIirect that signs be posted indicating that illegally parked
vehicles may be subject to towing; staff provide the neighbors with APCD information; and forward the
information contained in the complaints to APCD and OSHA. Approved 342 with Malcolm and Hortor.
absenL
.l7-J~
13-/0
s,..
~fi'I'" 4~cl..
f~.
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
ITEM TITLE:
Item I
Meeting Date 11/93 -%~;
Report: Response to Statement by Ms. Regina Hickey That Staff has
::::::ra::dp~~~::~ia~ :~s~;::~ject
1..~); f;'
City Manager (g,lv It;
kJ\
/t/
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
(4/5ths Vote: Yes_No.XJ
At the Council meeting of May 4, 1993, Ms. Regina Hickey stated to Council that she had
submitted plans last year for a low-rent hou,ing project, but had been discouragl:d by the
Planning Department based upon our opposition to affordable housing. Council directed staff
to respond in one week.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council accept the report and direct the Community
Development and Planning Departments to explore the advisability of developing an SRO zone
and/or standards.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
Ms. Regina Hickey, who owns property which is zoned R-3 and located near the north end of
Chula Vista along Fourth Avenue as well as commercially C-C zoned property located in the
same general area along Third Avenue extension, has been in contact with the Planning
Department over the last year and a half seeking development of both properties. Ms. Hickey
sought and received approval for 14 additional one-bedroom apartment units for her property
at 21 Fourth Avenue, with eight of those units recently constructed and an additional six units
presently under construction. Ms. Hickey's basic contention is that the City's standard for a
one-bedroom apartment unit, minimum 500 sq. ft. with a requirement for 60 sq. ft. of private
open space, is excessive, thus precluding her from providing affordable housing. It is also Ms.
Hickey's contention that previous units built on a property approximately 20 years ago are much
smaller in size and provide the opportunity for lower rents in what she has termed the
affordability range, whereas the present City minimum requirement of 500 sq. fl. for a one-
bedroom unit precludes her from providing rents that she considers affordable. In reviewing the
project with Ms. Hickey, it was pointed out that the City allows for a 400 sq. ft. studio unit, and
that the City's minimum apartment size has been existence for a number of years without
previous questions raised as to the size being detrimental to providing affordable minimum
standards.
I~-I
selllJAJeb //U
I"tJ/,'-
S-/l- q3
Page 2, Item I fe,
Meeting Date 5/11/93
With regard to s. Hickey's commercially zoned property, it is our understanding that her
daughter made an informal presentation to the City's Housing Advisory Committee in July of
last year and wa informed that she could proceed with a mixed-use project involving
commercial and re idential use, provided that a master plan was submitted and that the project
would meet all of City's minimum housing standards. It is our understanding that as a result
of that meeting, Ms. Hickey decided not to pursue that particular project.
Staff has proceeded to ontact Ms. Hickey by phone as a result of this Council referral to better
determine her questio on her interpretation of how the City is discouraging affordable housing.
During that conversatio , Ms. Hickey made it clear that she is concerned with the Council's
commitment of public fu ding to the proposed homeless shelter project at 31 Fourth Avenue,
when at the same time e would like to build smaller sized units to provide a level of
affordability and is preclud from doing so by virtue of the City's present minimum apartment
size.
It should be pointed out that aff has spent considerable time and effort working with Ms.
Hickey and her representatives 0 evaluate these development proposals and to resolve the
various issues raised by her w(t respect to the City's development regulations and review
procedures. We have also explaine in detail to Ms. Hickey the options she has in changing or
contesting the regulations with which he takes exception, or in appealing interpretations by staff
or decisions of the Design Review Co ittee. At no time did staff suggest that we are less than
supportive of efforts to provide decent, ow-cost housing within the City.
Ms. Hickey's contention is that the City's d welopment standards, such as unit size, landscaping,
open space, parking, and so on, make it eco omically infeasible to provide affordable housing
by the private sector. Most notably, Ms. Hick has accused the City Council, and various City
staff members of being opposed to low-cost ho ing because the Municipal Code establishes a
minimum size for apartment units. Prior to 196 , the City required a minimum of 400 sq. ft.
for any apartment having two rooms and 500 sq. ft. for three rooms. The ordinance was
modified in 1969 to reflect the present standards. Th e are: the previously referred to 400 sq.
ft. for a studio and 500 sq. ft. for a one-bedroom; in a ition, 600 sq. ft. is required for a two-
bedroom, and 750 sq. ft. for a three-bedroom unit.
Ms. Hickey has been informed by staff that these are gen ally undisputed and supportable
minimums for sound, liveable apartment units which have bee met without question by every
private or public low-income housing project with which we are t iliar. It has also been stated
to Ms. Hickey that the City's housing policies as reflected in Housing Element of the
General Plan provide that "low and moderate income households ,re entitled to the same
residential and environmental amenities as those which are standard to other families, and that
scaled down amenities and qualities build slums, and therefore must be carefully avoided... "
jjA-li"'~
Page 3, Item I ire
Meeting Date 5/11/93
Nevertheless, it has also been pointed out to Ms. Hickey that the City Code provides for
exceptions from the normal development standards where it has been shown that liveability and
environmental quality can be maintained. Appropriately located senior density bonus projects
for low- and moderate-income seniors, for instance, have been found to require less parking and
somewhat smaller than avera;'~ units--although none as yet have been proposed below the
minimums noted abovenand thus exceptions to the density, parking and other development
standards have been granted by conditional use permit for such projects.
With respect to her own properties, Ms. Hickey has been apprised of her ability to apply for
variances from the development standards; that she can appeal decisions of staff or the Design
Review Committee with respect to issues not subject to the variance process, such as design
requirements; and that she may propose and perhaps underwrite consideration of proposals to
modify the development standards as they apply to apartments or SROs. She has chosen not to
pursue any of these options.
The Community Development and Planning Departments could examine the appropriateness of
a single-room occupancy ordina~ce andlor standards that might be applied to a project as well
as determining whether or not ordinances need to be modified to encourage such housing.
FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable.
(hickey.al131
ffr 3-
~
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item I~
Meeting Date 5/18/93
ITEM TITLE:
Public Hearing To consider adoption of an interim pre-SR-
125 Development Impact Fee and to consider modification of the existing
Transportation Development Impact Fee
Director of Public Works if
City Manager
(4/5ths Vote: Yes_NoX)
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
Due to involvement between the City Attorney, Administration, and several departments, more
time is needed to finalize the report. To complete staff review and give adequate time for
Council and public review of the material, we request that the public hearing be continued until
June 8, 1993. The packet and consultant report will be distributed one week earlier than the
normal mailing.
CST:HX-022
WPC F:\HOME\ENGINEER\AGENDA \CONTINUE.125
)5'-'/
FileNo.
PUBUC HEARING CHECK LIST
""\ I 'g I \q~~
#'2.'2SJ J.,""""f~ ~~ G.-..- T~
WENIlDtl h"t-r -l. ~ ~.J: -.-.. ....,-tc.k~~.:...-~ r
.5(2. - \"1-S ~ \,~&r-" Q' _ '0 I ~...u.-
SENT TO STAR NEWS FOR PUBLICATION .. YFAX V; BYHAND_; BY MAIL
CIIT COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DATE
SUBJECT Q..rl'. J \Q,. ~..;......
PUBLICATION DATE 1--\ I 'l + \ 5 I
MAILED NOTICES TO PROPERIT OWNERS
I~q~
-
NO. MAILED
PER GC 54992 Legislative Staff, Consrruction Industry Fed, 6336 Greenwich Dr Suite F. San Diego, 92122
LOGGED IN AGENDA BOOK S / s / q ~
COPIES TO:
Administration (4)
Planning V
~
Originating Department
Engineering V
Others
City Clerk's Office (2)
/'
POST ON BULLETIN BOARDS
$/ f&. /q 3.
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:
-58.
!~-3
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
BY THE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL will hold
a public hearing to consider the following:
Amendment of Ordinance No. 2251 updating the Eastern Area Transportation
Development Impact Fee; and,
Adoption of Ordinance establishing the interim pre SR-125 transportation
facility fee.
If you wish to challenge the City's action on this matter in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this
notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk's Office at or prior to the
public hearing.
SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL on Tuesday, May
18, 1993, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building, 276 Fourth
Avenue, at which time any person desiring to be heard may appear.
DATED: May 5, 1993
Beverly A. Authelet
City Clerk
/5'-- i
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE
CITY COUNCIL of Chula vista, California to consider the following
items:
- Amendment of Ordinance No 2251 to update the Eastern Area
Transportation Development Impact Fee
Adoption of the Ordinance establishing the interim pre SR-
125 transportation facility fee
This generally affects areas East of 1-805. All Engineering
studies and related documentation are available for review at the
Engineering Department, City of Chula Vista, 276 Fourth Avenue,
city of Chula Vista, CA 91910.
If you wish to challenge the city's action on this matter in court,
you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else
raised at the pUblic hearing described in this notice, or in
written correspondence delivered to the City Council at or prior to
the public hearing.
SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL on Tuesday,
May 18, 1993 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Services
Building, 276 Fourth Avenue, at which time any person desiring to
be heard may appear.
The City of Chula Vista, in complying with the American with
Disabilities Act, request individuals who require special
accommodation to access, attend and/or participate in a City
meeting, activity or service request such accommodation at least
forty-eight hours in advance for meetings and five days for
scheduled services and activities. Please contact Lombardo De
Trinidad for information or your request at (691) 691-5034.
Service for the hearing impaired is available at 476-5342 (TDD)
DATED: May 4, 1993
BEVERLY AUTHELET
CITY CLERK
(LDT\CounnotZ)
........-
/5'~~
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item / ~
Meeting Date 05\ 18\93
ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: Conditional Use Permit PCC-93-16; Request
to Construct a 60' Cellular Antenna and Communications
Equipment Shelter at 779 Anita Street - Applicant: PacTel Cellular
/7/~'-
RESOLUTION: Approving PCC-93-16 to construct a 60' cellular
antenna and communications equipment shelter in the IL-P Zone
located at 779 Anita Street immediately adjacent to Interstate 5
at the southwest CfJrner f APN 622-102-12
&~.,rfY
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Plannin .t'"
REVIEWED BY: City Manager JCi ~~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes_NoLI
PacTel Cellular is proposing to construct a 60' high cellular antenna and
communications equipment shelter in the IL-P Zone located at 779 Anita Street
immediately adjacent to Interstate 5 at the southwest corner of APN 622-102-12 (see
Sheet 1 of Attachment n A n).
On December 4, 1992, the Environmental Review Coordinator determined that this
project is generally exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality
Act per Section 15061 (b)(3) (General Rule).
RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the resolution approving PCC-93-16 based
on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: On April 28, 1993 the Planning
Commission voted 5-0- 2 recommending that Council adopt the resolution approving
PCC-93-16.
DISCUSSION: Adjacent Zoning and Land Use:
Site
North
South
East
West
ZONING
IL-P
IL-P
IL-P
IL-P
1-5/M-52
LAND USE
Manufacturing
Manufacturing
Warehousing
Manufacturing
Freeway/Network Studio (TV 69)
F:\HOME\PLANNING\MARTIN\PACTEL\9316A.113
I~"'J
Page 2, Item / f,
Meeting Date 05/18/93
Existing site characteristics.
At present, there are four existing 25 foot high, one-story industrial/manufacturing
buildings at the same address. These structures are north and east of the proposed
location, which is at the southwest corner of the parcel. Access to the antenna site
is along the eastern property line to the southeast corner, then along the southern
property line to the southwest corner. Immediately south of the site is the RTA
warehouse/truck terminal, while to the west across 1-5 is the network studio for
Channel 69.
Proposed use.
The applicant is proposing to construct a 60' high cellular telephone antenna, 288 sq.
ft. equipment structure and six foot high protective fence. The antenna, as proposed,
is not to exceed 60 feet in height. It consists of an antenna support structure
(monopole) and panel antenna system (see Sheet 2 of Attachment "A"). A maximum
of six (three on top, three on the bottom) two foot to fifteen foot long omni-directional
(whip-type) antennas may be mounted on the panel antenna system at the top of the
monopole. If this were to occur, the top of the omni directional antennas could be as
high as 75 feet above ground level.
In addition, the antenna support structure will have digital radio dish antennas placed
on it at various heights above ground level. These digital radio dish antennas will
range in size from two to eight feet in diameter. Depending on the size, anywhere
from two to four of these dish antennas may be placed on the tower. They are used
to accumulate and transmit voice data to the Mt. Miguel station and from there to the
main hard wire system.
A six foot chain link fence topped by three strands of barbed wire will be installed
around the base of the monopole and equipment shelter for security purposes. This
fence will be on the inside of an existing six foot chain link fence which surrounds the
property.
ANALYSIS
The siting of a cellular antenna is most appropriate in an industrial area. Since the
surrounding structures are 25 foot high industrial buildings used for manufacturing or
warehousing purposes, the antenna and equipment shelter will not be out of
character. In addition, the top of the antenna will barely be visible from the nearest
residential area which is located over 500 feet to the north. An antenna in a
F:\HOME\PlANNING\MARTIN\PACTEL\9316A.113
I/,- ,;..,
Page 3, Item J"
Meeting Date 05/18/93
commercial or residential zone would be less compatible by virtue of the greater
negative visual impacts the antenna would have on the surrounding uses.
No PacTel personnel will be present on-site on a permanent basis since there are no
living/office spaces proposed as part of this project. The only time anyone will be
present is during construction and for periodic maintenance.
The antenna is sited at this location because of the need to serve as many cellular
phone users as possible. This antenna will be located to serve portable cellular
customers within the South Bay area, especially mobil phone customers travelling on
Interstate 5.
NOTSCA~n
In a letter dated March 31, 1993 (AttacnmenC B''17~aff posed a number of questions
of PacTel, who responded in a letter dated April 7, 1993 (Attachment "C"). This
letter includes copies of several news articles on the social and economic benefits of
the cellular phone style of communications and a brochure explaining how a cellular
system functions. A memo from PacTel Cellular justifying the location and height of
the tower is also attached as Attachment "D." NOT SCANNED
Based on the foregoing and the attached material, it is Staff's opinion that the siting
of the cellular antenna at this location, in the IL-P zone surrounded by
industrial/warehousing/ manufacturing uses will result in the least impacts consistent
with the applicant's siting requirements and the benefits of cellular technology. On
balance, Staff supports the application.
FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable.
F:\HOME\PLANNING\MARTIN\PACTEl\9316A.113
It,.. .3
~
. \-
-4.
~
~
\i.
~
~'i
( PA? T~v ?f:.L..-L,A)vAfl-
"ll"'1 ANITA cA
2t'o I (
NORTH pU--4"7-lb
n~
:J
~
~
I
I
-,
I
I
I
-w
I
,
t
I
~---
. I
~---
---
L___
l
,AN ITA ~T.
':f In ee.t..
., o1A~"A. 'I
) /
~ecr
L.OCA TIO~
--- ,
,
,
I
,
I
. ,
"A "
) LOCATOR
A ~o\ alA-{)vAJ:2... Ai-J~I-,J~A
) It 'J.~ '7('( pro ?~IJIPME";
_ 11E' l/f"~p., ~ ...
'.
~~". --- - " ...........,~...,,----'-.., y
"U~-SlI (I~I) ~UU'u 'oe."..n ~o~# 0" ....." Sl.tO~ -...... o .
_WM),..,,'OO.,..... I;
,..'"... .......,., @J]0'il~@@~~\!D@J]@I .'IU'IIIO'+"W.-_nct l .
...1..... ........ ..... . ;
lI'rI1'TU:> . E ,
.........--......... 13.1 ~:~ J'Vd ~ o. , - ...
Ilou'Ja!JJn:>'UJnoqIO:> A,'; ! .
i ~ ~ . "
.
u <J <J<J <J . . .
~
~
IP=o
~.I.'~
~~
U~
<<~
~E
..IW
..Jt-
w_
3:l/)
Wl/)
u.z .!
'0
;:!: ~ :
(/) ic( =.
_U
> -z .
5
:5 5i! ~
::l:E i
J: 0 .
u u E
I-
UJ
UJ
a:
I-
en
<(
I-
Z
<(
)
/
i~
z
o
~
:E
c::
o
u.
~
t-
U
W
..,
o
c::
Q.
,
I
L
:r:
:Ii~:
I'.,
"'"
.;,:=
I'"
....-E II
I\II~'
~:1 :'" i i
~ii!ii I I
HIlII
;i!!I!i I i I
"31st l!hI .
',i.. ~,a!;r I
l,d:!I' ,,:",
"1';5 i!~i~ l
I.!h:i ,';'
1'1" I,hl i i:'i,:
'1!~,:li l'lili
~t~:iS HIli
'"j"!
.I!hih i " ,
lEi!!
: t.1~;
i ill;
.. Ii:.
.. "I
I tl-
. Ii!!
I ..
'"I
i .!r:1
!mii
II
. i
i I
1
,
I' ,
; i
1'1
i!l!
iul
Q.
<
:E
>-
t-
Z
C3
:>
!
.
,
,
" ~
" ~I
'I
"
Ii
__i.._ n ~
--...
O!- 1
r ,
I I
;
i I i !
h I
i . i ,
I
I . I , >-
H , ! ...
; :;
! . . u '"
. .. "
! .. .
-' !
! ... '
r i
t ! u'
\l I ..5
I , ~ I
i
Ill:
l! o.
'I ~i
! . , II: .
! I .. ~
I
I . E
t , ! !
I .
, I i :
! , i
I z
< .
I I
! ..I !
Q.
W .
t- E
iii "
,
S
33'd~
~..,'~
'd3~~\
3~"').s
/~-~
=
.
a
I
---
.-
"~'~.nl (IL.) ~ u u'n 'ohlP v.. ~O~f' .,. nU'1 UIOl mt-_" . o .
'YUi,_~'O(I"""" - P
......... "......,." @J]Uil~@@~g(\{]@J]~ ..I&.I'ItI:W"oilO~_"" t
,......... .........-. II . ~
lfV1lTT1O:> . <
..........--......... 13.1 ~:~ J'Vd c. > C\I
IIOU-Ja!llnO'UJnoqloo .;.; <
I . =t e I i .
. -
u. 0 <l <l . ~
! I
. ! : ,
i . I . . ~
d " i I
5 ~ E S ! , !
, ; I I
~ ~ . .
, ~ ~ 1 ; l t'
1 ~ I ~
. ;
5 u . , .
i . .
1 - - , ,
5 I e i . !
~ ,
. . , . . ,
= ; :: ; i ,
. i f i
i . . I
t I I ! "
y. o.
Z ; ( "\ i I I
0 . !
!;;: 1 I .
Q~ =
. ~ s '
> ~ ! ~ ~ ~
w $ . ! o I
....I ! o .
. ~~ I ~
w ! : ~ ~ :
:I: I i . .
.... o .
.;, . . .
u u ~ -
:J . .
0 ~ . z
.
~,. l/l . i <(
. ....I
e ~ Q.
f . W
....
Iii
i . : : c
. i = z
! i " :J
~ . ! 0
. . , .
E ,
- . . . ~ ~. ~. Q.
, . E ; I
, . :E
I ~ ~ . ~ ~M ~. I
. 0
u . ::: g
. i , - (,)
, I ~i E
i .
I e i: .
, = i
. , . i..1
E . . :: . l
..
. . . .. . ~~I ~.
~ ~ . ~. .
= . "
f f~ I Z ,-, 01
. . :~; e,
I I 0' ..
i= .," .,
~-' H
~I f~i
W ! ;;
....I. 0'
W ~ -.
I;
.... .:
l/l ! '.
w ! e,
.f
M :: Ii
e
tYlt.....J I z
I 0
. I !;;:
. ,
, I
= I E .1 >
E . , w
. . ....I
- . .
, , I I W
1 ~ I :I:
E . ,
, i , .= ~i J ....
I I I! IX:
I E
I , ~. 0
i . . =~ e; z
i I Ii II -
~ 8
I '/~ ,,,
-- .-
RESOLUTION NO. ) 71)..~
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL
APPROVING PCC-93-16, A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT A 60'
CELLULAR ANTENNA AND COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT
SHELTER IN THE IL-P ZONE LOCATED AT 779 ANITA STREET
IMMEDIATELY ADJACENT TO INTERSTATE 5 AT THE
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF APN 622-102-12
WHEREAS, a duly verified application for a conditional use permit was filed with
the Planning Department of the City of Chula Vista on November 18, 1992 by
PacTel Cellular; and
WHEREAS, said application requested approval of said conditional use permit
to construct a 60' high cellular antenna and communications equipment shelter in the
ILP Zone located at 779 Anita Street immediately adjacent to Interstate 5 at the
southwest corner of APN 622-102-12; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 28, 1993
and voted 5-to-0-to-2 recommending that the City Council approve conditional use
permit PCC-93-16; and
WHEREAS, the City Clerk set the time and place for a hearing on said
application and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its
publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and its mailing to property
owners within feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least ten days prior
to the hearing; and
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely
6:00 p.m. Mary 18, 1993 in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the
City Council and said hearing was thereafter closed.
NOW, THEREFORE the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby
make the following findings as related to PCC-93-16:
1 . That the proposed use at the location is necessary or desirable to provide
a service or facility which will contribute to the general well being of the
neighborhood or the community.
The granting of PCC-93-16 is desirable at the proposed location in that
it will provide a service which will contribute to the general well being of
the community by providing cellular telephone service in the Southbay,
thereby promoting commerce and enhancing emergency services in the
local area.
/~ - '}
Resolution No.
Page #2
2. That such use will not under the circumstances of the particular case. be
detrimental to the health. safety or general welfare of persons residing
or working in the vicinity or injurious to property or improvements in the
vicinity.
The granting of PCC-93-16 will not be detrimental to the public health
safety or welfare or injurious to the property or improvement in the
vicinity in that this project encourages commerce and the location
minimizes negative visual impacts to the extent possible.
3. That the proposed use will comply with the regulations and conditions
specified in the code for such use.
Conditional Use Permit PCC-93-16 is conditioned to comply with the
regulations and conditions specified in the code for such use.
4. That the granting of this conditional use permit will not adversely affect
the general plan of the City or the adopted plan of any government
agency.
The granting of PCC-93-16 will not adversely affect the Chula Vista
General Plan in that said project is proposed to be built on a site already
containing or surrounded by industrial uses and a major transportation
corridor.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL hereby grants
conditional use permit PCC-93-16 subject to the following conditions whereby the
applicant shall:
1. Obtain all necessary permits from the Chula Vista Building Department
and Fire Department prior to the issuance of any building permit. The
design of the tower and equipment shelter shall comply with the edition
of the Uniform Building Code and the Uniform Fire Code in effect at the
time of issuance of any building permit.
2. Utilize galvanized gray paint on the subject structures to the extent
possible in order to reduce the visual impacts of the proposed structures
and to allow for the most transparent view possible.
3. Construct the antenna support structure and panel antenna system to a
maximum height of 60 feet. Omni-directional antennas may be placed
,\HOME\PLANNING\MARTIN\PACTEL \9316CC .RES
/~-r
Resolution No.
Page #3
both on top of and below the panel antenna system to a maximum
length of 15 feet.
4. Pay applicable developer fees to the respective and applicable school
districts prior to the issuance of any building permit.
5. This permit shall be subject to any and all new, modified, or deleted
conditions imposed after adoption of this resolution to advance a
legitimate governmental interest related to health, safety or welfare
which City shall impose after advance written notice to the permittee
and after the City has given to the permittee the right to be heard with
regard thereto. However, the City, in exercising this reserved
right/condition, may not impose a substantial expense or deprive
Permittee of a substantial revenue source which the Permittee can not,
in the normal operation of the use permitted, be expected to
economically recover.
6. This conditional use permit shall become void and ineffective if not
utilized within one year from the effective date thereof, in accordance
with Section 19.14.260 of the Municipal Code. Failure to comply with
any condition of approval shall cause this permit to be reviewed by the
City for additional conditions or revocation.
That a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the applicant.
Robert A. Leiter
Director of Planning
Approved as to form by
B,"~B~~''Jr2
City Attorney
Presented by
:\HOME\PlANNING\MARTIN\PACTEL\9316CC.RES
I/'''' c;
FileNo.
PUBLIC HEARING CHECK LIST
CITY COUNCIL P.UBLIC HEARING ?ATE K d I ~ , .' CJ'I2::, .
SUBJECT c-~. j.~- "'f'r~ t ~.I..,:t1" ...~ ........... Ft. . + ~~
LeCxllv"1o "__T...Q ('.~.o, 0.,.... ~ ~ ~o' ~'- ~
_-l:h ..... C-e\,....... t. -fr.....,. b p......J- ...~.o.:r.~ e. 'l'-Iq 0....:::1. St. ..+-
SENT TO STAR NEWS FOR PUBLICATION -- BY FAX....L; BY HAND_; BY MAIL
sl'!? Itt~
PUBLICATION DATE
MAILED NOTICES TO PROPERTY OWNERS
NO. MAILED
PER GC 54992 Legislative Scaff, Construction Industry Fed, 6336 Greenwich Dr Suite F. San Diego, 92122
LOGGED IN AGENDA BOOK ~ / $ /a..:::.
COPIES TO:
Administration (4)
Planning. v'
~.
Originaung Department
Engineering /
Others
City Clerk's Office (2) /
POST ON BULLETIN BOARDS S 1(./ Cli ~
SPEC1AL INSTRUCTIONS:
.58-
/~ ~)1
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE City of Chula Vista, California, for the
purpose of considering an application for a conditional use permit
(PCC-93-16). The application, submitted by PacTel Cellular,
requests permission to construct a 60' high cellular antenna and
communications equipment shelter in the ILP Zone located at 779
Anita Street immediately adjacent to Interstate 5 at the southwest
corner of APN 622-102-12. A plot plan and legal description are on
file in the office of the Planning Department.
The Environmental Review Coordinator determined that this project
is generally exempt from the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act per Section 15061(b) (3) (General Rule).
Any petitions to be submitted to the City Council must be received
by the City Clerk's office no later than noon of the hearing date.
If you wish to challenge the City's action on this conditional use
permit in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues
you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this
notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at
or prior to the public hearing.
SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL on Tuesday,
May 18, 1993, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Services
Building, 276 Fourth Avenue, at which time any person desiring to
be heard may appear.
DATED: May 4, 1993
CASE NO. PCC-93-16
Beverly Authelet, City Clerk
: \HOME\PLANNING\MARTIN\PACTEL\9316CC. LEG
It -/.2
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE City of Chula Vista, California, for the
purpose of considering an application for a conditional use permit
(PCC-93-l6). The application, submitted by PacTel Cellular,
requests permission to construct a 60' high cellular antenna and
communications equipment shelter in the ILP Zone located at 779
Anita Street immediately adjacent to Interstate 5 at the southwest
corner of APN 622-102-12. A plot plan and legal description are on
file in the office of the Planning Department (see attached locator
map) .
The Environmental Review Coordinator determined that this project
is generally exempt from the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act per Section 15061(b) (3) (General Rule).
Any petitions to be submitted to the City Council must be received
by the City Clerk's office no later than noon of the hearing date.
If you wish to challenge the City's action on this conditional use
permit in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues
you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this
notice, or in written corr~spondence delivered to the City Council
at or prior to the public hearing.
SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL on May 18,
1993, at 6:00 p.m. in Council Chambers, Public Services Building,
276 Fourth Avenue, at which time any person desiring to be heard
may appear.
DATED:
May 5, 1993
CASE NO.
PCC-93-16
Beverly Authelet, City Clerk
COMPLIANCE WITH AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA)
The City of Chula Vista, in complying with the American With Disabilities Act,
requests individuals who require special accommodation to access, attend and/or
participate in a City meeting, activity or service request such accommodation at
least 48 hours in advance for meetings and 5 days for scheduled services and
activities. Please contact Nancy Ripley for specific information at (619) 691-5101.
California Relay Service is available for the hearing impaired.
F:\HOME\PLANNING\MARTIN\PACTEL\9316CC.NOT
/t//Y
TI~
:J
~
U\
'&
. \-
-4.
\-
~
'\L
~
~'i
I
I
-,
I
I
I
I
~-- -
, I
L___
..----
0.'-J : T A <01,
":\' KJ.. c:.u..
., OlAflIlAA Y
/
) /
pAt- T[;;.v ?f:-v..A)I/AP-
il'1 A'J1TA /
200 I (
NORTH - PU--4H&
LOCATOR
p... ( I
~o aWJv~ Ah.t~f"Jf-JA
) if 1t0 ~Q pr, !?k\)i PM f.J1'
" k8VfE:':\2.. /~ ~/~
I
L,J
I,
t
l
~eur
l-OCA TIO~
--- ,
Attachment "A"
- ~ ~-.,.__._...-....'~-:---
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
xxxxxxxxxxx~XXXXXXXXXXXxYxXXX,
x xx xxx. x xx xX xx xX xxxx ,y ,;" let' ': '( ',;
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxX~xxxxx~
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx~
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxXXXXXl
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
6220723300
~MILDRl:D R
~A 91911
ME NT CO
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
6220726100
;-OPEZ JOEL/Rilt G
CHULA VISTA CA 9191L
6220726900
P~pRS JAi'\P~--..
CHULA VISTA CA 91911
6220727800
~
CHULA VISTA CA 91913
6221021200
""L LIVING
, I
SAN DIEGO CA
TR US T 12-0 !)-89
92100
6221022600
RTA INTERNAT~T INC
CHULA VISTA CA 91911
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx,
xxxxxxxxxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
~YXX\XXX~XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
0220723400
KOilll..frNS EL~ il
CHULA VISTA CA 91911
-'
02207239uO
MOLINA ARTURO/MARY C
. BEJAR
CHULA VISTA CA 91911
. .
,.(:,,0720400
JjEELY ~i L
CHULA VISTA CA 91911
0220727300
~
CHuLA VISTA CA 91911
0220728100
~O A/BERTHA A
CHuLA VISTA CA 91911
CI TV BUS INESS CI
MPANY
927l't
6221023300
AMAY A VI LLAS L TO
c/o uDUGLAS ALLRED
SAN 0
Ii, ~6
L ABL 00398 PC C-9 3-1 b
ANTENNA; CELLULAR; AT 779 ANIil
X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX/,
X xxx XX X xxx X XX xx xx X xxx xx XX XX XX /,
X xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
X xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
X XXX Xx X XXX X XX XX XX X XXX XX xx XX XX e,
X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX,
X XXX XX X XXX X xx xx XX X xxx xx xx xx XX:"
X xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxXXXXXXXXXXX-"
x xxxxx X xxx XXX xx XX X XXX XX xx XX XX:'
X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX\
6220U0300
MURPHREE ';TEPHEN/HE..:iN FA.M,':Y
~
C "ULA VISTA ~A 91911
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX;
XXXXXXXXXXXXxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XX XX XX XXXX XX XX XX XX XXXX XXXX XX'
XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX Xx XXXX XX,
XXXXxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX,
XXXXXXXxxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX;
xxxxxXxXXXXXXxxxxxxxxXXXXXXX,
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxXXXXXXXXXXX,
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX,
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXxX,
XX XX XX XX XX xX Xx XXXXxxxxxxxxxx,
0220723200
~: 91911
6220723500
GODINEZ VIRGINIA <AKA
VJRGINIA>
C ANM k Y 4 n 22
b2 2072 36 00
PATENAU.; ~OLA
CHULA VISTA LA 91911
62207Z5900
idRABAS ESTiWN
5 AN OJ EGO CA 92120
6220726700
PETERS JAMES IJ
~91911
to 2207<7400
~
~ 91911
6221011900
liAY B k-tiii.iU SI NE IT S ~ARK
SOLANA BEACH CA 92075
6 Z210Z2400
....,.NTERNATIONAL INC
C HULA VISTA ~A 91911
6221023400
AMAYA VILLAS LTIJ
ilO DOUGLASJiW--LREIJ CO
SAN Dl [(') Ct, "21~c
)b-/~
022072bOOO
OPEL LEOP IJ III/ALEJANDRA
STA CA 91911
622072b800
PE IE RS JAM iiJi
CHuLA VISTA CA 91911
tJ~ 2>:U2 7600
~AREN I
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
b221012300
~ IJIEGO TELE~ISION
CHULA V"""A CA !1911
I HC
b221022500
IlUTU:R SCOTT
SAN DIEGO CA 92111
I
<.221023500
AMAYA VILLAS LTD
. U DOUGLAS ALLRED CO
SA N IJ.
08
~J~
~~~
~..,::........~
~~~~
CllY Of
CHULA VISTA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
March 31, 1993
PacTeI Cellular
5355 Mira Sorrento Place, Suite 400
San Diego, California 92121
Attn: Philip L. Millenbah
RE: PCC.93.16 - Questions posed by City staff
Dear Phil:
As follow up to our meeting of March 12, 1993, listed below are the questions we
feel need answering in order to appropriately evaluate the 60 foot tower proposed for the
779 Anita Street location. Even though some of these are already answered in the reports
submitted to staff, if you could condense the answer in layman's terms it would be most
helpful.
1. Why this location and not across the freeway or to the north or south?
2. Why the height of 60 feet?
3. Will other antenna be needed eventually, and if so, at what distance from this one?
4. What is the anticipated life of this antenna?
5. Can this one be moved 50 to 100 feet to the east to screen it more from viewers
alor.g 1-5?
6. Will this tower replace other area towers?
7. Can PacTeI's competition use the same tower?
8. What factor must exist which would prompt PacTel to consider another tower in
this area?
9. What are the options for screening this tower?
10. What magnitude earthquake is this tower designed to withstand?
11. Who are the primary users of this tower?
-I
It--II Attachment
276 FOURTH AVflCHUlA VISTA CALIFORNIA 9:910/1619; 6e1.5~O'
"B it
PCC-93-16 - PacTe! Questions
March 31. 1993
Page #2
12. What economic benefits will the City derive from this tower?
13. In a general sense, how does cellular work, particularly with respect to the network
of antennae and users?
14. What factors go into locating cellular antennae?
15. How many cellular companies are there, and will others require antennae in Chula
Vista?
16. Is cellular controlled by the FCC or some governmental agency? Do they have
regulations which apply to siting antennae?
17. Can one large antenna be replaced with two or more strategically placed smaller
antennae?
18. What public, as opposed to private, interests are served by cellular service?
19. Would PacTeI be agreeable to removing the antenna if and when technology
provided a less obtrusive alternative?
If you can think of any other questions, please don't hesitate to add them to the
list. Also, you may wish to reorder/reword/combine some so as to present a better, more
logical progression.
This project is tentatively scheduled for the April 28, 1993 Planning Commission
meeting. In order to meet the deadline for the drafting of the staff report, resolutions
and exhibits, please respond by April 7, 1993.
Your efforts are greatly appreciated. If you have any questions of you own, please
contact me at 476-5335.
Sincerely,
U1a'~ ~
Martin ~
Associate Planner
--
" -~
~
cc: Steve Griffin, AICP, Principal Planner
/ b~ /8
-~
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
PACCTEL.
CELLULAR
APac.h;: Te.eslsCompany
April 7, 1993
Martin Miller
Associate Planner
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, Ca. 91910
Re: PCC-93-16 - Questions posed by City staff
Dear Mr. Miller:
Pursuant to your letter of March 31, 1993, I have answered all of
staff's questions. I hope the answers to the questions are clear
but if you have any additional questions please call me at (619)
625-7655.
siycere~' J j /
;x' L L ~ c. it It /{ {L-
I Julie Hud le
~~overnment Relations Manager
Attachments:
Questions posed by staff
F:\USERS\RE\SOUTHBAY.FEW\CUP.QUE
/l)~/I
-.3
Attachment "C"
QUESTIONS FOR THE SOUTH SAY
CELLULAR COMMUNICATIONS FACILITY
1. Why this location and not across the freeway or to the north
or south?
The objective of the proposed cell site is to provide new
geographic coverage, a new microwave backbone and enhanced
cellular capacity. Therefore, siting of the facility was
narrowed to meet this required engineering criteria. The
proposed Anita street site location was selected because it
met the engineering criteria, was an existing industrial use,
the topographical elevation was good, and the natural
vegetation in the area provided screening for the area. It is
possible for the facility to be located across the freeway
however, the available site on the west side of the freeway is
barren and can be viewed from several angles in the community
and the freeway. PacTel Cellular takes pride in the siting of
a cell site. We attempt to locate a cell site in a community
which will meet the required engineering criteria but that is
least obtrusive site.
2. Why the height of 60 feet?
Cellular operates based on radio waves and while the natural
forces of the radio waves can bend a little, mountains,
buildings and trees can obstruct the path of the cellular
radio waves. Therefore, the cellular antenna array needs to
clear the "near field obstructions" to work properly. The
near field obstructions at the proposed cell site are
approximately 45 feet.
3. will other antenna be needed eventually, and if so at what
distance from this one?
Construction of cell sites depend upon customer base and
engineering criteria to keep the network functional.
Therefore, as our cellular customer base and demand for
service, both telephone and wireless data, grow PacTel
Cellular will build cell sites to meet market demand.
However, as the customer base grows, the geographic area that
is covered by each cell site becomes smaller and new
facilities can be sited at lower elevations. Sometimes when
a "smaller cell" needs to be created the near field
obstructions such as mountains, hills, buildings or tree
groves help to isolate the radio frequency.
Ib-10
-r
Page 2
4. What is the anticipated life of this antenna?
PacTel Cellular anticipates the proposed antenna system to be
a part of our network for at least the next 20 years. At that
time PacTel Cellular will re-evaluate the system and determine
if this cellular facility will need to be a part of the
system.
5. Can this one be moved 50 to 100 feet to the east to screen it
more from viewers along I-5?
Cellular basically operates on "line of site" propagation.
Therefore, it is important for the cellular facility to "see"
its coverage area. One of the goals of this cell site is to
cover a portion of the I-5 corridor and parts of Chula vista.
If however, PacTel needed to move the facility the following
issues would need to be solved:
1. Height of the antenna support structure would need to
increase to at least 80 feet. The increase in height
directly relates to the bulk of the pole so that the pole
can withstand the windload. Finally, the facility will
need to clear all near-field obstructions.
2.
The fire hydrant,
several on-site
evaluated.
truck turning radius, and removal of
parking places would need to be
3. Approval of the property owner must be obtained.
6. will this tower replace other area towers?
This is one of PacTel Cellular's only facilities in Chula
vista and is the only site proposed with a monopole.
7. Can PacTel's competition use the same tower?
Yes US West could use the same tower however, there are
engineering and construction issues that must be taken into
consideration with site design. If PacTel Cellular and US
West were to co-locate there is a minimum distance of 20'
vertical separation and horizontal separation required and
PacTel would need to secure the antennas at specific heights
to insure proper integration to the existing network. To
date, the proposed pole has not been structurally engineered
to accommodate other users.
-5
I ( __, /
I 0" 0-/
Page 3
8. What factor must exist which would prompt PacTel Cellular to
consider another tower in this area?
See the answer to question #3.
9. What are the options for screening this tower?
Screening a 60' antenna support structure is difficult
however, PacTel Cellular has proposed the slimmest antenna
support structure possible and has suggested the pole remain
galvanized grey to blend with the sky. Often it is thought
that a sky blue color is better than a grey pole but PacTel
Cellular believes the grey pole is less obtrusive.
10. What magnitude earthquake is this designed to withstand?
As you know, the cellular facility will be built according to
the earthquake standards set forth in the Uniform Building
Code. However, both the manufacture of the monopole and our
architects tell me that the windloading requirement are much
more stringent that the stress of an earthquake.
11. Who are the primary users of this tower?
PacTel Cellular is the primary user of this tower however, we
allow emergency and government services to locate at our
facilities whenever possible. Although PacTel Cellular is a
"business" we are committed to the safety of this region and
participate and provide services as a means to that end.
12. What economic benefits will the city derive from this tower?
The telecommunications industry is one of the most vibrant
industries in the United States. The PacTel Cellular San
Diego Market has been selected on several occasions run
special tests for new products and services. One that you may
have read about is the testing that Qualcomm has done in
cooperation with PacTel Cellular. Another example is PacTel
and UPS venture in wireless data transmission. Finally, that
presence of telecommunications, we believe, enhances business
communication and therefore can positively impact the City of
Chula Vista. In addition, PacTel Cellular believes there is
a social benefit to the presence of cellular in a community.
(Please see the enclosed articles.)
16- 2-2...
-~
Page 4
13. In a general sense, how does cellular work, particularly with
respect to that network of antennae and users?
Please see the enclosed brochure.
14. What factors go into locating cellular antennae?
Please see answers to Questions 1, 2, & 3.
15. How many cellular companies are there, and will others require
antennae in Chula vista?
There are two cellular carriers currently licensed with the
Federal Communications Commission.
16. Is cellular controlled by the FCC or some governmental agency?
Do they have regulations which apply to siting antennae?
The Federal Communications Commission, Federal Aviation
Administration, and the California PUblic Utilities commission
all regulate the development of cellular facilities. However,
we believe we have proposed a facility that will meet the
local regulations as well as the other agency requirements.
17. Can one large antenna be replaced with two or more
strategically placed smaller antennae?
The southern portion of the San Diego region is in the "second
tier" stage of a four tier process. The first tier includes
siting of towers atop mountains. These sites provide cellular
coverage, cellular capacity and microwave backbone. The
second tier includes monopoles between 80 - 50 feet. The
monpole sites interconnect to the mountain sites to provide
the microwave backbone, provide a smaller geographic coverage
area (smaller cell of coverage) and enhanced capacity. The
third tier includes sites (usually located on top of
buildings) between 40 - 30 feet. The cell sites co-located
with buildings further reduce the geographic coverage area and
further enhance the capacity. The final tier which is still
being test are sites located at 30 - 20 feet. These types of
cell sites cover pedestrian oriented areas that have a high
rate of foot traffic, such as a downtown area. .
/(~.3
-7
Page 5
18. What public, as opposed to private, interests are served by
cellular service?
Please see the attached brochure and Question 12.
19. Would PacTel Cellular be agreeable to removing that antenna if
and when the technology provided a less obtrusive alternative?
PacTel Cellular acknowledges that the telecommunications
industry is changing rapidly and we would consider re-Iocation
of this facility if the technology provided a less obtrusive
alternative. As a locally based company, PacTel Cellular is
committed to the community which it serves and would like to
continue to be a good neighbor.
Ib-24
-8
S.D. Union - February 3. 1993
Qualcomm sees trend
in PacTel Cellu1ai-de81
By JAMes w. CRAWLEY
Staff Writer
PacTel Cellular's recent deCISion
to buy 30.000 band-held cellular
telephones based on Qua1coniin
Inc: s technolollY is seen as a fur.
ther booat to the San Diego compa.
ny's emerlling telephone system.
Qualcomm officiala say the Pac-
Te! deal is the subject of the fint
of . series of anticipated 1nIIOunce-
menta this year that they hope will
boost their digital wireless techno!.
01)',
By April, the company hopes, a
s. national te!ecommuniationa group
will set industry standards for the
,Iy Code Division Multiple Access
(COMA) digital cellular system in-
vented and tested by Qualcomm.
Then, company officials hope,
thell' COMA system will become
the winner in the battle for suo
I"
ptemacy of the nen 'generation of
cellular telephones.
"There's been a real affirmation
(of the COMA syst41!IV: said Qual-
comm l'resldentFtarvey" White.
"Now. people are followin. it up
with orden.. . .~ 'l: ". d '
By early 1995, Loa Angeles-area'
CUltomen will be offered COMA
service, said Craig FarriU, a vice
president of PacTel Corp.. the par.
ent of PacTel CeUular. "',
SlmiIar COMA service will be of.
fered to San Diego area cities and
po.sibly other California cities
where PacTe] operates cellular
syotetna, FarriU added. He did not
specify when those syotems would
begin digital operations.
FarriII said PacTe!'s decision to
s.. CelIuIIlr on Page C-2 .
.I~
/ 6 -/;<s-
-1'
Cellular
Qualcomm sees trend in deal
Continued from Page c.,
use CDMA may not bI! implemented in every city
where the company operates cellular phone systems.
[n some cities. including San Francisco, Dallas and
DetroIt, PacTel is a partner with other cellular com-
panies,
Some partners. including McCaw Communica-
tions. the nauon's largest cellular company, have
backed a competlOR d'llltal system. Time DiviSIOn
Muluple Access <TDMAl.
Plus. Famll saId, some transmllting and switching
eqwpment IS bwlt by comparues that haven't devel.
oped CDMA eqw!,ment. and PacTel is reluctant to
switch vendors.
Currently, cellular phones use a system of analog
radio SIgnalS to transnut bl!tween portable wuts and
a network of cells, which relay calls. Each call uses a
slOgle channel that can't bI! shared. But concerns
about lOsufficient capacIty have fueled a push to build
digital cellular systems that can increase usaRe.
Two digital systems are under development 10 the
United States.
TDMA has been deployed commercIally in Miami
and is expected to bI! available in other CIties this
year. Its makers say theIr digital system can increase
capacJty three times over the current analog
systems.
Dunng the past few years, Qualcomm has develop-
ed its CDMA aJternauve, which has the ability to
handle 10 or more calls sllOultaneously per channel.
US West IS expected to inaugurate CDMA servtce 10
Seattle late this year. [t is to bI! followed by PacTel
servtce in Los Angeles in 1995.
PacTe!'s Jan. 13 announcement that it would buy
30.000 phones from a U.S. unit of a Japanese man-
ufacturer was the first announcement of a large-scale
order for CDMA customer equipment.
Qualcomm 'President White said that while the re-
cent PacTel announcement affinned the acceptance
of CDMA by another major company Qualcomm's
technology will probably draw many more orders as
soon as standards are approved.
By late April, it is likely that the Telecommwuca-
lions Industry ASSOCl3lion will give final approva! to a
CDMA standard.
Income
Average '91 salary here was $24.998
/6-;<. b
Continued from c-,
<"10 ,.. _..........._. ;_ , n""
DIVIDENDS
DECLARED
T\mDA'~C
...
-
........
--
.._.,...._AOIl
0rwM........
E-.V_1IlC
I....., 11ft ,...
..._"
T_it_A
T...._
'TOO<
.m...... .
..1.J_'-:~1
,.
_en ,
I.J"'2~.-.ct....."
--
=-...
1.1....._.....
CWM_
I.l....r__~.
~
..-
"IIW'r_",~
_~""1'Il:'l
--
_en
,.JlWhllift.
--
,.J_I..".
...LU'
-en
_en
""--
FttFIclII'OWVA.
_u.-..
........-U'--1ClcIO
'-!u CMIW:.
_u. .....
_N_
-........
--...........1"4
~.....MI..
-..-..
__JlJOI.OW:o \
~"YoVY<\Mt... ~
"""",,1oI"~ ~
..........,.~ ..
__NT~ OJ
"--OM~ '"
__"1IIwOual ..
........,... 0..- ~
-- ,
-- ,
-- ,
-- '
-- ,
__T.~ ~
_en
--
SllllulCa
J.....I4l..,.
00IDUCEIl
r......,.co.a ,
un...
_u._
"-CA____
_u._
_u._
_u._
-...-
-.........
--
--
--
-........
--
--.....
-..-
-..-
--...,~
..,....In'.......~
__Ill.,,,,,,,,,,,,,
".,.......,.Ol.-w:
........T~
-...-
........", MOuII
.......,...o..wa
--
--
--
--
--
frtMMTlt~
........
.--
.......
--.
~.....CI
-,,-
-"""-
--
-
...........L.IIIW '
I._~'-'_'
-
--
AOlIM..... '" .t
..ca....... "M
ACM__ .. ..
M:Il__ ....
~.. M.I
....,.N"nI .Ill ..
... T...... III ..
..........-
-/c
~
\,
).j
\j
SAN DIEGO UNION-TRIBUNE
OCTOBER 24, 1992
Escondido I-ligh sees cellular phone as lifesaver
By JOHN BERIlMAN
SI;lU \Vli,,"1
ESCl IN 111110 A <:elllllar plllme ",ay
lIa\',' saved Ihe lirc.~ of Esnnulitlo lIigh SdlUol
foo-Illall ptotyt'r VII Uang. Iruukally, Ihat p.u-
Iicular pholle was lilt' IJloperly of Sail MillTOS
Ili~h Sdlllul.
Nuw, Ih;lIIks to P,wTd C.'lIl1lar alii I lhe
srhool's BlItlsl(~r Cluh, ESCflIHlido lIigh
SdlllOI hfts i1s OWII ('('lIl1lar ..hone for emer-
~elldes snd. as t1w nllt~ Orl. 2 whf"u nail"
suffered .1 serious he:ul injury aflcr heing
lat:kled !ly tlllet~ Sail Man:os players.
OIlicials lru", "a"Td .Iollated a $:1511 <:ellll-
lar phone 10 the school, amllhe Uooslcr Cluh
preseuted a I'he,'k yesleulay lor $114,75,
whi<:h will he IIse.1 to cover pholle bills that
may amount to ahout $10 a month.
"The flllrpuse 01 I his ceremony is 10 show
what you and the duh working together cau
do," p,illripal Shirley Il,'hkopf told ahout III
me",bers 01 the football tea", aud dub offi.
cials yesterday allhe school. "Ilecause 01 you
ami your support. you were able to bring I he
comnUll1ily ItJgelher.
I
-
-
"Thallkllllly, Sail Marcus lIigh Sdluul had a
f'f'lIlllar I'holl(' that ni~ht. 311ft herallse of Ihat
VII is duillg su wplllocli.y. We al'e now (orlll-
lIale 10 have a fclllllar phone of our own,"
The hallt'ry-pow('recl cellular phone en~
..hled San Manos lIi~h Irailler Cllrt Casper-
SOli 10 llIalcc .m illllllt'(Ii,.h~ 911 call frolll Ihe
(oolhall (i(~hl. Within IhH~e millutes, Escollcli-
do parilJlledks fluivccl, aucl wilhin anolher
few minlltes I )allg was receiving a CAT scan
at lU~arhy Palomar Mellieal Center.
Illllt'c Ward, athl"Ii<: diredor and fuotball
nJadt. ,lIul Hkk I.olhspekh. all Escondido
lIigh player, lold yeslenlay's galhering Ihal
lIanll is walking a",1 talking al Seripps Me-
1lI0rialllnspilal ill Encillitas and seems on his
way to a normal recovery,
Jeanie O'llrien, who was in charge of Ihe
hake sale Ihat raised the $114,75 10 mver
the nlOllthly cosls 01 the ..hone, noleel Ihal
alHlIII $:\,01111 was raised 10 help pay fur
liang's medical eXl'enses lrom a breakfast
last Salnrday al the T-Ilird (liner.
Jackie 1I00per, huosler president, said
abonl $6,11011 was raised at a bowl-a-thonlast
Salllnlay,
The school is planninR more fund-raisers 10
(,Uset Ilang's mcdkal expcuses. The family's
health insll,a",:e IH.lky doesn'I 1"'lVide lull
coverage (or all Ihe expenses incllrred frolll
Ihe surgery, hospilali1.ali4J1\ ami rehahilila-
lioll.
Alsu in respollse tu Ihe lIang inju, y, IIII'
(;rnss",ont \Jnion lIigh S<:InH,1 lIish it:! I","
flun'hased III cellular I'holles fur its high
sch'H,ls. The I'houes will he available for the
Ocl. :10 gallles,
Re'llIesls for "ellular phoues by sOllie 01
Ihe sd,ool's alhletic dCl,arlllleuls iu the Ilis.
Irict had beeu deuied in the I,ast.
"Unfortuuately, it takes a serious iujulY
like the oue to Vu nang 10 "hange I'riorities,"
said Mike Eddy, Grossmollt's direclor of a,l-
millislralive services. "It's :I wise investment
1I0t ollly for f'Mllhall games, hut for l>raclices
allol lor olher sl'orls alld school evellls,"
A PacTel spokeswomall said Ihere were 45
high schools Ihat had cellular pholles before
(lang's illjury,
TIMES-."DVCX:."7E
OCTOEER 24. 1992
The latest in football equipmem
Escondldo High Schoollootball coach Bruce Ward
calls district Superintendent Jane Gawronski on the
scnool's new cellular telepnone, donated to the
scnool Friday by PacTel Cellular 01 San Diego. The
need lor the phone was highlignted earlier this
month when player Vu Dang sulfered serious head
DA.N RIOS/St:lrl photo'f'aphPr
injuries in a game. Dang got prompt medical help be-
cause the visiting team. San Marcos High. had a cel-
lular phone and called lor an ambulance. School
Principal Shirley Rehkopf and PacTel's James
Buecnier lIank Ward while members 01 the lootball
team iook on.
(ORIGINAL PHOTOGRAPH WFS IN COLOR)
1(; .,2 B
-/2-
"""
~
f,
'~,
"",
I
~
SAN DIEGO UNION-TRIBUNE
OCTOBER 15, 1992
Vu Dang injury proved benefit of quick response
By TOM SHANAHAN
Sl..1I Wriler
It worries Dr. Charles Camara-
ta that ambulances are no longer
rnutinely fnund parked al high
SdUHll football games.
Camarata has volunteered his
time as Caslle Park lligh's leam
dodor for :In years, so he knows
why times have changed. But he
says the serinus head injury suf-
fered two weeks ago by Escondi-
dn lIigh fool hall player Vu Dang
is a frightening example of why
schnols should pay the $150 to
$2flfl per game In have an ambu-
lance on hand, no maUer how
rarely life-Ihreatening situations
()(~cur. .
"It bothers me because it's
nice to have everything already
Ihere when Ihere is a serious
neck or head injury," said Camar-
ata. "^n EMT mmergency Medi-
cal Technician) is beUer-trained
fnr a Iife-threalening injury Ihan
a trainer."
When Dang was injured nn the
Escondido field in a game Oct. 2,
Ihe 911 call wenl to Ihe Escondi-
do !'ire lJeparlmen!. A paramed-
ic ambulance unit's response
I ime was three minutes from
substation to scene. [lang, who
was in a coma. was treated on
Ihe field for Ilminules befnre he
was taken 10 Palomar Medical
Center in Escondida, where sur~
gery for a subdural hemaloma
was performed to save his life.
"If J were a (larent with a kid
playing at ESCOIUlido, I wouldn't
have a prnblem wilh it (no ambu-
la",:e parked at the game)," said
firefighler Neil IInhbs, coordina-
tor of Escollllido's paramedics.
"We were 011 the srene in three
minutes. Our target is five min-
ules. The syslem worked."
Beginning in Ihe mid-1970s,
many fadors have changed the
face of medical supervision at
high school fool ball games.
lIennie Edens, Poiut Loma's
fnothall coach for 38 years, re-
members when privale ambu-
lance companies would park an
ambulance at a game as a maller
of public relations in the commu-
nily.
John Reisdorfer, special-events
roordinalor for lIarlson Medical
Service, said his cOIIII.aIlY ami
olhers no longer can afford 10
staff games unless Ihey have a
contract with the school.
"fl's a reneclion of our national
health-care problem," said Reis-
dorfer, whose company has done
business in the connty for 40
years. "We have to he more effi-
cient wilh our costs. It's a bigger
cily now. The old days of the lo-
cal ambulance guys dropping by
to cover a game are gone."
Privale ambulances are slaffed
with Iwo EMTs. Paramedics are
beller-trained Ihan EMTs, but
there aren'l enough public-
service paramedics to starr every
high school loolhall game. If all
paramedic units are out when an
emergency call comes in, the call
is farmed out to a private amhll~
lance.
The San lIiego Unilied School
lIislrict's policy requires high
school principals 10 have on hand
two of three medical services -
all amhulance, team doctor or
team trainer. A survey of the
cily's 15 public high sdwols
showed 1 () have 311 ambulanre at
all home games.
In Norlh County, where 16
public high schools represenl
nine school districts, a similar
rule is enlorced by Ihe Norlh
Counly Conference, and mosl
schools have ambulances at home
gamf's.
Polky for I he If) puhlic high
schools in East County's Gross-
mont Union High School lJistrict
requires only a doctor al each
game. Private ambnlances are
rarely mnlracled.
The eight public high schools
in Soulh nay's Sweetwaler lInion
lIigh Schnol District are only re-
'luired 10 have a certified trainer
011 site, and Camarata said he
rarely sees an ambulance at
games in the eight~team Metro
Conference of which Castle Park
is a memher.
Allhough mauy of today's par-
ents can recall roulinely seeing
amhulances at games when they
were in high school, coaches and
adminislralors say overall medi-
cal snpervision is belter now Ihan
il was two decades ago.
Some coaches said having an
ambulance at a game comforts
parents, bul Ihat Ihe coaches are
comfortable wilhoul an ambu-
lance becanse they believe para-
medics provide timely emergen-
cy service - especially if a
cellular phone is availahle tn es-
tablish initial contact from the
field.
San Marcos Irainer Curl Cas-
persen used such a lelephone,
purchased six years ago hy the
San Marcos booster club, to call
911 when Dang was iujured.
An Escondido !'ire (leparlment
log iudicates Ihat call was re-
('eived at 9: J 6 p.m., that a para-
medic subslalion and a fire sla-
tion were alerted olle minule
later and thai both dispatched ve-
hides al 9:19.
The Ing shows thai Ihe vehi-
cles arrived at the field siIl1ll1l..-
neollsly at 9:22 and that trans-
portalion to Palomar lIospital
commenced at 9:33.
Two paramedics Ireated Dang
while a fireman drove I he ambu-
lance, which arrived al Ihe hospi-
tal 23 minutes afler the call was
made.
----...
~
~
'-
~~~ ~~~f
,;,:-~,--er nctim Hill
:1~Jg plaY5 along with
:,lenaS in his own
tund-raiseL
'a.e l'
....-'-'
-..-...........
I
Sports
.
-
THE SAN DIEGO UNION-TRIBUNE' SUNDAY, OCTOBER 4, 1992
.
SECTIO~. !:t
In Bnef ......... 2
Ma;or League!. -4
Viewpoints ...... .. 6
Scoreboard ..................... 14
-
ill
;.. \*'
~." I]
}IJ1'- ·
I
I ':i
..........
fl
.f"....
_,..nl,~.._ >fJ.....I;"~LIPf,
,--sport star: Fu nOl/g
all all-/mgur serond
;rmml last spring.
Escondido player still critical after surgery
By TOM SHANAHAN
SIIII"""'"
ESCONmno - To escape
rrom Vietnam to the United
Slate:. J2 years ago, Vu Dang
had 10 survive a harrowing expe-
r1t'nce. His family fled in the dead
oi night on his grandfather's fish.
ing boat.
flang ultimately came to Es-
condida and realized a dream by
beC'oming a high school football
star. But the Escondida High
Wide receiver now is fighting 10
!'ourvive another kind o( battle.
Dang, 17, suffered a serious
head injury Friday night in the
I
......
-..J::..
At 17, Vu Dang is fighting to survive - again
Cougars' 14-0 win at home
aRainst Sail Marcos. He remained
in critical condition yesterday ai-
ler 3Y2 hours of surger}' at Es-
candido's Palomar Medical Cen-
ler.
Dang, a 5-100t-7, 155-pound
senior, suffered a subdural hema-
toma and lapsed into a coma
when he was tackled while re-
turning a punt in Ihe founh quar-
ler, at about 9:15 p.m,
Surp:er}' was perlormed to Slap
the hemorrhaging that was put-
ling pressure 011 Danc's brain
and 10 remove a Mood dol. Or.
Imad Shahhal. a neurosurgeon,
was encouraged by Dang's prog-
ress yesterday but said Oang is
not out 01 danger. Shahhal said
the mortality risk (or a subdural
hematoma remains high for at
leasl Ihree days, The biu:est
fear is that Oanc will start hem-
orrhaging again.
Shahhal said Oang began to
emerge from the coma yester-
day. His pupils were responsive,
lhe ductor said, and he was able
to mo\'e his arms. 8tH Shahhal
said lhe le(t side of Dang's body
is not responding as .'ell as his
right.
"Ther:e is always tbr possibility
of damage," said Shahllal. "But he
has a good chance to pull through
without any maior problems,"
nang was treated on the field
by Escondido team doctor Relt'is
Fallon and San Marcos trainer
Curt Caspersen. Ca!oDrrsen sum-
moned paramedics v.itb a cellular
!Wone, saviOR crucial minules:
Fallon and Caspersen worked
to keep Dang breathing and 10
stimulate his cardiac 'unctions
for another 15 minules until
paramedics arrived. Only one
hour after the injury occurred,
Shahhal was perlonning surger}',
"He is very lucky that hE:
reached the hospital so quickly,"
Shahhal said, "The mortality rate
for an injury like this is very high.
The key wa~, we have a trauma
center here. We were able to
See Injury on Page H-15
(' PAGE 6, Mira Mesa/Scripps Ranch Sentinel, August 20, 1992
.~
PacTel Cellular Opens New Headquarters
PacTcI Cellular San Dic~o
has signed a Itase wilh Mira
Sorrenlo Auociales In occupy
Rpproll.inL1ldy 37,500 square roct
of Sorrenlo Towers as ils S311
Diego headquarters. The lease
provides PacTel Cellular with
almosllwo Ooorsof oUice space
in the West Tower.
.....
,
~:)
~
.......
~
In mitl Augnst, PncTcI Cellu-
lar will cnnsolic.lale three sepa-
rate offices inlo their new head-
quarters Incalctl in Sorrcnltl
Towers.
"The need for a new head-
quarters Ind additional space
relled! PaeTd Cellular's suh-
st:lIllial growth in the rasl silt
years'" said scon Hoganson,
Vice PrcsidclIl and General
Mana ger CI r PacT cI Cellular San
Diego. "When we began our
opcmlions in S:m Diego in 1985.
we had fewer Ihan 12 employ-
ees. Today we IHlve over 200
I people in our employ in CllS~
tomer service, engineering,
huul3n resources, salcs, mar-
keting, aet.'Ollnling, husiness
development, ul'eralions and
achninistralion, ..
An atfditinn81 3,800 square
feci of rc1ail space in Sonento
COllrt will he conver1cd into a
PacTeI Cellular Service Center
10 accoml11otlale sales, service
and installation of cellular cquip-
mellL
"11le Service Cenler, conven-
knlly Incatoo near the bxJ coutt,
will provide customers Ihe
opportunily In select phOIlCS,
aclivale phone numhers, and
inslall phones in lheir cars, all
from unc location," saitl t>.1j-
chael Brunskill, Direclor of
Service OllCraliuns.
The cellular phone, once
t.'ollsidcred a luxury ilem, has
hccnme a popular communica.
linns 1001 10 help individuals
lillldion mnre efficit.'lllly in their
I)cofessiclmll and pcrsl)nallivcs.
ACl..'ording lulhe CcllularTclc-
cOl11nulnicalinns Induslry Asso-
cialion, there are ellrrenlly 1.6
million cellular suhserihcrs in
lhe Unil\'d Stolles. Apllroximalcly
100,000 of lhose lIsers are 10-
caled in Sail Diego Counly.
"Our current cuslomer base
is I S limes greater Ihan il was al
Ihe end of our firsl year or
OllCr;lliun six years ago," said
Hoganson. "We allributc our
grnWlh In localizcd customcr
scrvice and the qualily of cellu-
lar coverage we are ahle In
pmvide Ihrough our nclwork of
cell siles. H
"Our decentralized structure
allows us to operate all of otlr
deparhnenls from the San Di-
ego hcadqtlDr1ers," Doron Ln.
rie, Directur of Sales nnd Mar-
keting said. "The sales Icam is
haded hy the local expettise
prflvidetl hy a slrong cuslomcr
servicedcpar1mcnthascd inSan
Diego."
"Because our hcadqtJar1crs
oUice is located here in S:m
Diego, we ore ahle to hencr
respond 10 Ihe needs of lhe
communily." said Jim Buech-
ler, OircclorofBusiness Devel-
opmen!. "Producl~ and calling
plans are created specilically
for Ihis divcrsilied market."
To mcelthe needs of t.'clllllar
users in San Diego. PacTeI
Cellular has inslalled of-
Ihe-art cellular ell!.., .,)cnl
Ihrnuchoullhe county. PacTcI
Cellular provides 3,564 square
miles of cellular coveragc in Ihc
San Oicgo arca.
"Whcn sdecling cell silc In-
cations, our San Dicgn-ha<:cd
engineers cV:llu:ltc Ihe (.'Ollnl y '."
v:uied terrain ami select loea-
tinns llfrering Ihe grealesl etlv-
cra~c." said Bob Sampson,
Direclor of Ndwnrk Ope-r.alions.
"Placcmenl of cell sites is hasell
un the needs of Incal residents
and husinesses, terrain, an(t
adja(.'cnt cellular syslems illchld-
ing Mexico and Los Angeles, ..
PacTeI Cellular is a "idi-
aryoClhePaciCleTcksi. ,up.
n worlclwic.le diversified lek-t.'um
I1Ilulicnlions cO'llt,ralillll hast.'11
in San Francisco.
-
~_'\N DIEG) UNION-TRIBUNE
OCTOBER 18, 1992
PAGE 1 OF 2
Motorist
with phone
frustrates
carjacking
I b - 32-
By ED JAHN
Staif \linter
A publicity-,hy motorist with a cellu-
lar phone led police to a group oi sus-
pected carjackers Friday night after he
saw a couple ordered to give up their
car at gunpoint in a Del Cerro grocery-
store parking lot.
Police arrested two Juveniles after a
ioot chase In Encamo and were looking
ior three other persons believed in-
volved In the carjacking. They said they
believe the vouths also were involved in
an armed robbery In the Rolando area
earlier in the evening.
Police saId the motonst deserves a
reward ior trailing the carjackers while
alerting police over his car phone.
There have been nearly 200 carjack-
ings in San Diego this year. police said.
Friday alone. there were nine attempted
or successiui carjackings reported in the
city.
The inCIdent, also have turned vio-
lent. with a victim shot to death two
weeks ago. And a suspected cat]acker
was stabbed to death by an intended vic-
Urn last week.
The motorist who helped police in the
most recent incident. however. proved
to be a reluctant hero. "I don't want to
be a headliner and then have somebody
come aiter me with a gun," said the Del
Cerro reSIdent who asked to only be re-
ferred to as Joe.
"But when 1 saw that guy standing
there with a gun aimed at that women, 1
was ready to back my car into him and
kill" the gunman. he said.
Leo and Gladys Palmer, the couple
that were iorced out oi their car. were
not injured. "This can happen to anyone
In any neighborhood at any time oi the
day. You have to be alert: said Leo
Palmer.
"The smartest thing to do in this kind
of situation IS just to gIve them the keys.
You can always get another car: he
said. "Ii 1 had had my way, though, 1
would have killed the guy on the spot.
He has no place In socIety."
The Palmers. who have lived in the
-I'
See Ca'lecking on Page 8-5
"-
~.
I
~,
~
, I
......
-...;:)
PAGE 2 OF 2
Sundoy, October t8, J 992
THE SAN DIEGO UNION- TRIBUNE
Carjacking
Molorist. with phone
lips police 10 c~rillle
Conlinued Irom Page 6-1
Del Cerro area lor ahollt 40
years, h.d stopped 10 buy a quart;
01 milk at Slump's M..rkel on lIel
Cerro 1I0ulevard al .boul 9: 15
p_m. Palmer said he had laken
ahoul Ihree sleps from his 1990
Cadillac when a mall "pul a gun in
my face."
"I jllsl leI Ihem have Ihe car.
My wife was so nervous sbe
cOllhln'1 find Ihe bnllon" 10 nn-
loek Ihe car door so she could get
0111, be said. Meanwhile, Joe was
gelling ready lu leave Ihe
parking lot in his van afler shllP-
ping al Ihe grocery slore.
". heard Ihis guy wilh a gun
yelling, 'Gel oul or "11 kill you.
You hear me?' and Ihis lady was
on Ihe passenger side of Ihe car
Irying 10 undo Ihe door locks,".
Joe said.
"I was unarmed bul il I had
""ard a shol I would have backed
up and killed the jerkenheimer ,"
he said. "AI Ihal IJoinl, Ihe wom-
an was gelting oul ollhe car and
her hllsband Iried 10 flag me
down bill I dedded 10 follow Ihe
guys."
The Cadillac and a while van
driven by Ihe carjacker's accom-
pikes wen I 10 College Avenue
and headed soulh, Joe said. "They
were going Ihrollgh slop lighls
caulionsly and I was ahle 10 slay
in sigh I ollhem. I had Ihe police
on Ihe phone a",11 read Ihem Ihe
license numhers, a description of
Ihe people and bow many Ihere
were."
AI slale ROllle 94, Ihe carjack-
ers realized Ihey were being
lailed alld began speeding wesl
unlil Ihey reached Ihe Kelton
Road exil, he said. 'They wenl
illlo a church parking 101 and pul-
led 011 10 see if I was lollowing
Ihem. They were looking righl al
me and Ihe cops were lelling me
10 keep my dislance, so I kepi
going," Joe said.
By Ihal lime, police had palrol
cars, a helicopler and a canine
unil in Ihe vicinity. Five people
ran Irom Ihe Cadillac inlo a can-
yon along Ihe Ireeway, police
said. A loaded glUm automatic
was recovered hy police.
The police helicopler pilol
used Ihe deparlmenl's new For-
ward Looking Inlra-Red device,
which delecls people in the dark
by Ihe heal given 011 hy Iheir
bodies.
Abonl 30 officers were in-
volved in Ihe search and arresls.
Witnesses saill a police dOR
mauled one suspect's arm.
The Iwo jnveniles were being
held al juvenile hall on sllspicion
01 Iwo COllnls III armed robbery
and one counl 01 alllo Ihefl. Po-
lice said Ihey have connecled Ihe
suspecls 10 an armed rohbery on
Seminole Drive al 8:50 p.m. Fri-
day where a man's walle I and
some beer were taken.
AUlhorilies praised Joe. "This
is Ihe kind of gllY we give awards
10," said Bill Rohinson, police
spokesman. "And Ibis is Ihe prop-
er way to get involved - from it
dislance. Lei police do Ihe COIl-
tact work."
Joe saill the nn rhone was a
wise illvestmeut. "Fur ..hollt $:IS
a month you've got sume securi-
Iy." However, he also said Ihe
carjacking incident was JIIilking
him Ihink abonl carrying a weap-
on wilh him while driving.
As ror the puhlicilV, Jot- ~;liil it
lIa... its tlrawhaiks. "^luIlH 12
ye;1I s ago I foiled II", I ape III .
girl in EI Cajon. There were \ wo
Irial. and Ihe defendanl, who had
been released, got my name and
gave me a 101 of Irouble," he said.
'" feel good lor Ihe people who
got Iheir car back hnl I don't
wanl 10 be hem of Ihe day," Joe
said. "I jusl don' I need Ihal in lilY
lile."
Stall Wriler Frank Klirnll.o conlrthuled
10 this repOlI
/(;;-34
-/3
_.ur Technology is an eS5ent131 pan of the commUnlcatlons
. olCh our sooety depends Cellular telephone semce
prO\ldes numerous benefits that make our commUnities safe
History:
PacTe] Cellular is a subsidiary of the Paone Teles15 Group. a world\\lde
dlwrslfied telecommunicatlons C0rporation based In San FranCiSco
PacTel Cellular 15 one of the largest prO\lders of cellular telephone 50mce
in the Vnited SL1te5. Pac Tel Cellular Introduced one of the flrSt cellular
systems In the country In Los Angeles during the 1984 Olympics PacTel
Cellular. ellher alone or in pannership \\ith others, O\\TlS and operates
cellular syslems in eight of the 20 largest cellular ffi;nkets in the l'mted
States, mcluding: San DIego, Los Angeles, San FranclSCo, Sacramento,
Detroit, Atlanta, Dallas and CmcInnati
On August 14, 1985. PacTel Cellular mtroduced cellular telephone
senice in San Diego County. On that day, more than 500 San Dlegans
were instantly pro\ided senice. Exactly one month later, the company
celebrated its 1,aOOth customer in San Diego County The company
began \\11th three cell sites m the core of the CIty Today, PacTel has oyer
50 cell sites whICh sen1Ces over 85 percent of the County
Local PacIe! Cellular Operations:
PacTel Cellular is the only cellular senice pro\lder In San Diego \\lth a
local customer 5enice team, PacTel's state-of-the-an customer selilce
prO\ides sales, installation, customer senice and billing informJuon
Additionally, sales and senice branches are located throughout San
DJego Count)'
/1,
-17
.~ .'7 ~
-, 1
'---'^-
HOW
CELLULAR
WORKS
III
~
Cell Sites.
Large metropolitan areas are di\ided into small geographiC areas known
as cells. Each cell is seniced by a cell SHe whleh houses a computer to
process telephone calls and an antenna system that receives and transmits
signals from cellubr phones. A5 a cellular phone call moves from one cell
to another, the callis automatically "h:mded off' from one eel1 to another
The process occurs so qUlCkly that the caller doesn't notice a transfer has
occurred To gel the best co\uage, a cell site must be locJted on
suffICiently high terram to al1o\'.' the radIO to transmJt Signals. Sometimes
antennas are IOCJ1Cd Jtop a tall bUlldmg In a metrapohlan area or on a
tower atop a mounlam
Mobile Telephone Switching Office (MTSO).
Cell sites transmit telephone calls to a \1oblle Telephone Sv.itching Office
(~1TSO) ThIS 15 Ihe cemral corn pUler for Ihe cellu13r nemwk. Exp13med
Simply as the "cleannghou5e" for all cellular calls, the MTSO 5en'es as the
lInk for all commumcal1ons The MTSO allows cellular phone calls 10 be
handed off from one cell 10 anOlher.
The Need For More Cell Sites.
There are .'holes" in the network where cellular coverage is poor or
nonexistem due (0 the fact that cells cover a spectfic geographic area.
Once a cellular call moves out of range of a cell site and another is not
available to hand off the call. communicauon IS lost. Therefore, as the
denund for cellular increases and expands, addluonal cells are required
in order to m:llntam a high level of 5enice and/or prO\ide enhanced
senice for cellular users.
'-
'-
\....
'--'
L.
~
G
I-I
Cd' "" I
I-I
I
I-I
I
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
...
w
( 6 - 3b
Home or Office Phone
Cel/ular Phone
j)
...J-.J
J-.J
~
a
.
.
.
.
.
.
~
Mobile Telephone
Switching Office
(MTSOi
Telephone Company
(conventional senice)
_20
DIE BENEFITS OF
PACTEL CELLULAR
& YOUR COMMUNITY
DISASTER AND CELLVIAR
Saving Lives
Many fire depanmem. pohce depanrnents and medIcal personnel rely
on cellu12r phones to pro\lde emergency 5eT\lCe for you. In add1tlon to
emergency and medical Sfnices. the cellular telephone network pro\ldes
communication In the eyen! of a dlsaster
On Oewllel" 1~, 1989, a dnusrarin6 c"mhquJhl~ 1111 SaIl
han,Js((I All ((In\cntwlwl jtlh,lllC COmmUl1i(mlC'n.' \fere
/tIS], CdlulJ! philllCS pr,l\!dl'J (onll11U1il..QiI,llb
ImmedlQtely Cellular lInked Sail FranCl5W w rile
OUls:J(' 1\(1rU Hl'/P. rdltJ, and aId rushl'J 1\1 cun/].
qUJl:c \l(lIllLS in !1,\'J
Cellubr phones brndn ]oca1 commumlle5 and neIghborhoods In more
waY5 than we rcake Bekl\\ arc some examples of cellular workmg m
your commUDlt)
911 Calls
PacIel Cellular makes Jl P,)5S1bk f(1T an ('If lt~ customers to dla191 1 for
emergenCies free of charge
Peace Officers
PacTel Cellular offer~ a dlscount to all San DIegel peace officers including
Shenffs and CaJifom13 Highway Patrol (CHPI officers This allows our
peace offICers, eyen when off duty, to aCllmmedlately m dangerous
silual10ns
MADD
MADD and PacTe] Ccl1u13r j0med fNces \\lth the CahfomlJ. Hlghway
Pam.1] lCHP) to remo\"(' dangerous drunk dnvers from our roads
Cellular phone users \\-ere encouraged to dla] 911 and repon drunk
/ /'
6 '-:5";/7
dn\'er5 10 the CHP In addlllon, PacTel Cellular muJed red nbbolli. a
S)mbol not to dnnk and drive, to al1 of our subscribers. Progral115 such as
these haw helped reduce the number of alcohol.relatcd aCCIdents b: 20
percent nationmde smce 1982
Snwhing Vehicle Prevention Program
The Smokmg VehICle Pm'mlion Program and PacTel cellular phone
users help reduce an pollution In 1989, PacT el Cellular becamr a Jomt
spollior \\lth the CHP and the AJr Pollulion Control DlStnct (APCD) 10
reduce eXceSS1\"!? auto emissl0ns PacTel permIts Ils customers \0 make
free cellular phone calls to the APeD and repon yehlCles produemg
excessl\'\:~ exhJust
EmergClUY Community RespollSe
Duong the riols in Los /\ngeles. PacTel Cellular responded immedIately
to requests for cellular phones ~ ode law enforcement offICers and
hrehghters struggled to (Omr9] arson-related fires and lootmgs, cellular
was often the clear chOlee of communications when land Ime telephones
were nOI accessible and land Ime systems were In use beyond capacity
Despite the seyCI shakmg oj a 1_4 eanhquaRc on JUI1C
28,1992, Pa,TeI Cellular's system In Sou/hem
California ranaincd strong and cdlular users were aNc
to plaIf emergmcy calls.
PacTel Cellular Patrol
Radio listeners are prO\ided wnh tramc congestion infonTIatJon on local
freewa)'s. This up-to-the-mmute mforrnation is possible when PacTel
Cellular subscnbers phone a hothne to repon accidents, slJllled vehicles,
or obstructing debns
..
...~
-2/
HEALTH
& CELLULAR
Public Safety
Cellular systems operat~ in a band of frequencies similar to
te!e\ision and AM/FM radIO, \\1th low!evels of radiO frequency
energy Studies haw been conducted and experts agree that Jow
levels of radw frequency energy are nO! harmful to humans
Slandards have been de\'eloped by the Ammcan Nallona! Slandards
Institute (A\'511, an organization WhlCh determines the safe level
of radIO waves for humans PacTe! Cellular operates Its system
well \\1thm The A!\SI slandards The radio frequency energv
at PacTel's een sites lS typlcal1y only 10-20 percent of the
allowed level
Dr. Samuel \.hlham, a regarded npen on radlOW3\'e
transmiSSIOn and public safety. confirmed In a February 23,
1990 letter that cellular telephone transmIssions are not hannful'
,~
, 'I'
i ,//
{//~
,
/
S.- ':';,
,,- -. '" '
~>
I 6 - 3'l
. . the resultant fields are so weak as 10 pose no threat
10 health. These fields are mU(h weaker than AM and
FM radio transm~sion fields .
Dr. Samuel Milham, MD., MP.H
Depar1mcnt oj Health
State oj Washington
-.2.2.
~
~~
@
printed on recycled paper
CEllULAR GLOSSARY
Cell:
A small geographic area served by a low-powered transmitter, two
to 10 miles in radius.
Cell Site:
An installation containing the transmitters, receivers and control
eqUlpmem necessary to connect the cellular phone caller ""1th the
MobHe Telephone S,,'tchmg Office (MTSO)
Cell Splitting:
The dl\islOn of a larger cell into 5e\uaJ smaller cells to pro\ide
more ctlannels v.ithm the same geographIcal area and therefore
pro\ide better senice.
Cellular GeographiC Service Area (CGSA):
A speCIfic geographIC area vllthm whiCh a cellular system SeTYe5
customers. t-.lobile customers usually subscribe to cellular 5eJ"\lce
v.ithm a speClfJc CGSA
Digital Radio Link:
A radlO 51gnal used 10 connect telephone circUits from a cell site to
the Central sv,ltchmg eqUlprnem (located at the t-.nSO)
Electronic Switching System:
A computer that automatically roules calls v.lthin the cellular
system (located at a central sHe')
Hmul-Off:
The aUlomatlC s\~ltchmg of a slgnal from one cell to another, whlCh
occurs v.ithm a fraction of a second.
Mobile Telephone Switching Office (MTSO):
Also known as the MTSO or "SV,ltch ~ It 15 the connecting de\lCe
among all cen SHes in a cellular system and the interface between
the cel! SHes and the com.entional v.lreline telephone network It
ser;es as the central coordinator and controller, as well as houses
the s,,"chmg eqUlpmrnt for a cellular telephone system_
Roaming:
The ab"ny to operate a cellular mob"e telephone m a CGSA other
than the one in whIch it has been activated. For example, roammg
pern1lts use of your cellular phone in Los .A.ngeles or Seattle even
though sef\ice was activated m San Dlego
Sectoli;;:ation:
An engineenng refmement of a cell's transmISSIOn antennas, which
imprO\-es call quality by reducmg cross talk/mterference_ This 15
done by dl\iding the coverage of the cell SIte mto three equal
sectors by means of dIrectional antennas
Wireline Telephone Network:
The conventIOnallocaJ telephone network which transmits calls
over v.lres rather than radio wa\'es. The FCC has ruled that
",relme compames or their afftllates may apply for cellular licenses
in those areas where they currently prO\ide v.ireline sef\ice
I
/ /-
C. -. 7c'
'J7
4..~L
~~
/\
/ \
/ \
/
,
\
\
/
/
)'
\
\
e
-2~
PacTel Cellular
Jan 28, 1993
Subject:
Southbay Cellular Communications Facility
Located at n9 Anita, Chula Vista.
Regarding: Justification for Location and Height
-----...-----.
Location: The site was located to serve portable cellular customers within the areas of
Chula Vista, Imperial Beach, 1-5 through Chula Vista and the Silver Strand (1-75). The
selected location is the only area identified which would provide the total coverage
required. This conclusion was reached after mobile field testing of three surrounding
locations, and performing propagation analysis on the areas identified as possibilities.
The site is proposed to connect to the MTSO (mobile telephone switching office) via a
digital radio link. The hub site for connection would be San Miguel Mtn. located
approximately 11 miles northeast.
Heiaht of tower: The tower height is determined by three factors: 1) The cellular radio
propagation pattern clearance over the near-field obstructions. 2) The line-of-sight digital
radio path clearance requirement. 3) The coverage and propagation characteristics
required for coverage of the defined area.
1) The near-field obstructions include the 35' height of the adjacent building top and
the 35' to 40' trees. The near-field region is defined as the area where the power density
increases with distance from the radiating antenna (in the far-field region the power will
decrease with distance). This factor is important because the propagation characteristics
of the antenna require no near.field obstructions. Calulations of the near field region give
a required clearance of 8 feet. Therefore, all surfaces of the cellular transmitting antenna
must stay clear of local obstructions by a minimum of 8 feet. The proposed cellular
antenna is physically 6 feet in length. The minimum total height for near field clearance
is the sum of the following:
Near-field region =
Local obstruction height =
Transmitting Aperture =
8 feet
40 feet
6 feet
54 feet
2) A digital radio link will be used to interconnect the site with the MTSO. The radio
path must maintain line-of-sight clearance to the connecting hub site (in this case San
Miguel Mtn.). In this situation, the path will require clearance from local obstructions and
obstruction anywhere along the path. Since the interconnect point, San Miguel, Is
significantly higher, only the local obstructions need be addressed. These would be the
surrounding trees. The local trees appear to be approximately 40 feet tall. Taking into
account some margin for tree growth, 10 feet, the microwave antenna (or dish) would
I ( 40
i b-
-?'1
Attachment "1)"
require a mounting height of 50 feet. Since the microwave antenna cannot be mounted
at the same level as the cellular antennas, a minimum separation of 10 feet must be
provided between them. This 10 foot separation will require a tower height of 60 feet.
3) Propagation modeling was performed at 2 elevations to determine the coverage and
frequency interference characteristics for the site. Tests on this site were performed at
elevations of 40 feet AGL (above ground level) and 60 feet AGL. Analysis of the computer
generated predicted coverage patterns showed that the 40 ft. AGL coverage pattern Is
much more limited than the 60 ft. AGL coverage pattern. Once the computer analysis was
completed, a drive test was performed to confirm the modeling assumptions. Drive testing
results confirmed the design assumptions that a site at this location should be designed
with a structure at 60 feet AGL.
Based on the above information, it was determined that a 60 ft. high structure would be
required to accommodate our cellular and digital radio link requirements at this
location.
-;/t'#~,
Michal J. Koenig
Engineering Manager
PacTel Cellular
li;- <1 I
-2.,5
THE CITY OF ....JULA VISTA PARTY DISCLOSURE ~ ."ATEMENT
Statemer.: of disclosure of certain ownership interests, payments, or campaign contributions, on all matter~
\ which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council, Planning Commission, and all other
official bodies. The following information must be disclosed: '
1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the contract, i.e., contractor,
subcontractor, material supplier.
PaeTe1 Cellular Philip L. Mi11enbah
2. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all
individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership
interest in the partnership.
N I A
3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is non-profit organization or a trust, list the names
of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or
trustor of the trust.
N/A
4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of the City staff,
Boards, Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months? Yes
No L If yes, please indicate person(s):
5. Please identify each and every person, including any agents, employees, consultants or independent
contractors who you have assigned to represent you before the City in this matter. .
Julie Huddle, PacTe1 Cellular Philip L. Ml11enbah,AICP
619.625.765~ 619.540.0992
6. Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggregate, contributed more than $1,000 to a
Councilmember in the current or preceding election period? Yes _ No L If yes, state which
Councilmember(s):
~ is defined as: ~II)' ilJdil'idufl/,jirm, co-pnnnrrsllip, joilJl ~.ctJI"rc, association, social club, fraternal orgalJization, corporation.
("IIIIt., /nISI, rcecil'cr. s)'ndietl/c, Ihis fllld fill)' olher COIIIII)'. cil)' fllld eOllllrl)', cil); nWllieipfllil)', distriel or orher poliriefll sllbdi";sioll.
VI' ""'y other group ur comhinntion tlcling as n IInit,"
("OTE: Attach addilional pages as necessary)
D:liI:: November 17, 1992
'\el t<<:U~,J~
Sign:lture of contractor/applicant
Philip L. Ml11enbah
Print or type name of contractor/~pplicant
IR("\'I'l',lll.tll')fI]
-
!.\.; J :.VDISCLOSLTXll
/6- 42-
-'26
Excerot from Draft Minutes
of Planning Commission Meeting of 4/28/93
ITEM 4:
PUBLIC HEARING: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PCC-93-16; REQUEST
TO CONSTRUCT A 60' CELLULAR ANTENNA AND COMMUNICATIONS
EQUIPMENT SHELTER AT 779 ANITA STREET - Applicant: PacTel Cellular
Associate Planner Miller gave the staff report and asked that the Planning Commission adopt
Resolution PCC-93-16 recommending that the City Council approve the conditional use permit
based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained in the draft City Council resolution.
Answering Commissioner Tarantino, Associate Planner Miller stated that the antenna would be
shorter than the antenna on Highway 94 just before the Home Avenue exit. The whip antenna
would not be seen; the main structure would be the most prominent aspect.
This being the time and the place as advertised, the public hearing was opened.
Ms. Julie Huddle, 5355 Mira Sorrento Place, San Diego 92121, representing PacTel Cellular,
said they supported staff's recommendation and asked for Planning Commission approval.
Commissioner Ray asked if after the 20-year life span, the antenna would be tom down or
replaced. Ms. Huddle stated that the technology was getting smaller; there would be engineering
changes; they did not know what type of facilities would be needed in 20 years; as more
customers were brought on line, the facilities would be smaller. They would consider removing
the facility if at all possible.
Answering Commissioner Ray, Ms. Huddle said this was in addition to existing services.
Commissioner Ray questioned what kind of engineering changes would have to be made on the
pole, if additional users co-located, and what would that mean in terms of getting new
applications or further use permits. Ms. Huddle said they would have to make sure the structure
of the tower could actually hold whatever was being proposed; and there were engineering issues
regarding the way the antenna patterns would work. The reason for the separation of 20' was
so the antennas could operate correctly.
Commissioner Ray asked if staff was satisfied that those questions that could not be answered
currently would be handled at a future date as they arise. Mr. Miller concurred, and stated that
any changes would require a modification of the conditional use permit and would be assessed
at that time, both environmentally and from a land use perspective.
No one else wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed.
MSUC (Carson/Tuchscher) 5-0 (Commissioners Fuller and Moot excused) to adopt
Resolution PCC-93-16 recommending that the City Council approve Condition Use Permit
No. 93-16, subject to the conditions contained in the draft City Council resolution.
(6-13
-21
RESOLUTION NO. PCC-93-16
RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION, CITY OF CHULA
VISTA, RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL GRANT A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A 60 FOOT CELLULAR
ANTENNA AND COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT SHELTER
WHEREAS, a duly verified application for a conditional use permit was filed with
the City of Chula Vista Planning Department on November 18, 1992 by PacTel
Cellular; and
WHEREAS, said application requested construction of a 60' high cellular
antenna and communications equipment shelter in the ILP Zone located at 779 Anita
Street immediately adjacent to Interstate 5 at the southwest corner of APN 622-102-
12; and
WHEREAS, the Director of Planning set the time and place for a hearing on said
conditional use permit application and notice of said hearing, together with its
purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City
and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the
property at least 10 days prior to the hearing; and
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely
April 28, 1993 at 7:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the
Planning Commission and said hearing was thereafter closed; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION
hereby recommends approval of the attached draft City Council Resolution for subject
project, subject to the findings and conditions contained therein.
A copy of this resolution shall be transmitted to the applicant and the City
Council.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA,
CALIFORNIA, this day 28th day of April, 1993 by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
Vice Chair Martin, Carson, Ray, Tarantino, Tuchscher
None
Ch.;, "II". comm;";~
None
'N
Thomas A. Martin,
t
~ - r'~ W. ~ J.I '1
Nancy Riple , Secret'ary
:IHOME\PLANNINGIMARTINIPACTELI931 6PC. RES
/6--14
-28
COUNCil AGENDA STATEMENT
Item~
Meeting Date 05/18/93
ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: Conditional Use Permit PCC-93-26; request to
establish an educational facility at 660 Bay Boulevard (National
University) - Foster Properties
I?/~:J
RESOLUTION: Approving PCC-93-26, a request for a conditional
use permit for a continuing education/university facility at 660
Bay Boulevard in the I (General Industrial) zoning district
f/! /J#4 tJ;i~
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Planning f"
REVIEWED BY: City Manager J1 vo-i -z- (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No..KJ
The applicant, Foster Properties, in connection with the potential lease of the property
to National University, has submitted an application for a conditional use permit, PCC-
93-26, to establish a university/continuing education facility in an existing
office/research structure in the I (General Industrial) zoning district at 660 Bay
Boulevard, (Attachment "A") not to exceed 150 students and 10 staff. The property
is in the Coastal Zone and subject to the Chula Vista local Coastal Program and
Bayfront Redevelopment Plan.
An Initial Study, IS-93-28, of possible adverse environmental impacts of the project
was conducted by the Environmental Review Coordinator on March 1, 1993. The
Environmental Review Coordinator concluded that there would be no significant
environmental effects and recommends that the Negative Declaration be adopted.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the resolution approving Conditional Use
Permit PCC-93-26.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: On April 28, 1993 the Planning
Commission voted 4-1-2 recommending that Council adopt the resolution approving
PCC-93-26.
DISCUSSION:
Zoning and land Use:
Zoninq
land Use
Site
North
South
East
West
Office/Research Building
Office/Research Building
Vacant
Freeway
RR Tracks/Utility lines
/ 7~1
Page 2, Item 12
Meeting Date 05/18/93
Existing Site Characteristics:
At present the 1.8 acre, triangularly shaped site is occupied by a 34,452 sq. ft.
office/research building, of which National University will use approximately 8,000 sq.
ft. Access to the site is from Bay Boulevard at the northeastern and southern tips of
the triangle. Parking consists of 113 spaces. To the west, southwest and northwest
a SDG&E high power line and rail road line run parallel the property's boundary.
Further to the west, beyond the power line and rail road tracks, Rohr Industries
operates several industrial buildings. To the east across Bay Boulevard, the 1-5 right-
of-way runs in a north-south direction, while to the south, also across Bay Boulevard,
is a vacant parcel.
Proposed Use:
The applicant is proposing to establish an educational facility for National University
in order to serve the South Bay area. Classes are proposed to be held weekdays from
5:30 p.m. to 10:00 p.m., with office hours beginning at 7:00 a.m. There will be 10
staff and teachers and 150 students.
ANALYSIS
Chula Vista does not have a specific parking standard for higher education facilities,
but relies on information provided by the applicant and comparative data in order to
ascertain an appropriate parking ratio. This is based on Section 19.54.050 of the
Zoning Ordinance. This provision applies to all unclassified uses, of which the
proposed use is one. Specifically this section states:
19.54.050 Off-street parking and loading facilities.
Off-street parking and loading facilities for specific use proposed shall be
determined by the planning commission in the event such requirements are not
enumerated in Chapters 19.62.010 through 19.62.140.
Because university facilities are not enumerated in Chapter 19.62, Staff drew on the
information submitted by the applicant and the parking ratios for university uses from
other jurisdictions.
As a comparison, the County Zoning Ordinance requires one parking space for each
employee and one space for every two students for universities or educational
institutions, while the City of San Marcos requires the same. These ratios have been
in effect for some years in these jurisdictions and no apparent problems have resulted.
Using these ratios on this project would result in a minimum requirement of 85 parking
spaces (150/2 + 10 staff or 75 + 10 = 85). Because the site provides 113 spaces,
17'.4
Page 3. Item / 7
Meeting Date 05/18/93
Planning staff is satisfied that parking will be adequate to serve the 150 students and
10 staff.
Since the Planning Commission hearing on April 28, 1993, at which parking was
discussed at length, Staff has learned that the applicant, Foster Properties, and
National University have chosen to execute a parking agreement wherein additional
parking up to a total of 150 to 180 parking spaces will be guaranteed to National
University utilizing adjacent parking at 630 Bay Boulevard. The execution of this
agreement should be complete by the time this project is heard by Council.
At such time as National University may wish to expand the staff and student
population, a condition has been included which would require the conditional use
permit to be modified to include additional parking. This can take the form of an
expanded parking agreement for parking spaces on the parcel to the north at 630 Bay
Boulevard. In the event adequate parking can not be provided, National University will
be required to cap its student and staff population and seek a site that is adequate for
the proposed population.
The project is conditioned to include 8 parking spaces for bicycles for those
staff/students who wish to use their bikes rather than drive (ratio of 1: 20). This is
also based on County of San Diego standards, since Chula Vista has no such
requirements. This is, however, consistent with and implements Objective 6, Goal 1
of Section 3.2 of the Circulation Element of the General Plan which states:
"Provide related facilities and services necessary to permit the bicycle to
assume a significant role as a form of local transportation and recreation".
The site can be accessed at two driveways, one at the southern tip of the triangle and
one at the northeast tip. These driveways were part of the original approval at the
time the site design was reviewed and have proven themselves to be adequate and
safe for ingress and egress to the site.
To ensure that no parking or traffic conflicts occur between businesses that may in
the future locate in this building and arriving students, National University has
arranged their class schedules to begin at 5:30 p.m. Since most businesses operate
until 5:00 p.m. this will provide a 30 minute window between employees departing
from and students arriving at the site.
At present, the use is not permitted under the Local Coastal Program (LCP). However,
LCP Amendment No. 11 will be considered by the Coastal Commission sometime in
May, 1993. This amendment was already considered and approved by the City
Council/Redevelopment Authority on March 23, 1993. In addition, the project
conforms to and implements the Bayfront Redevelopment Plan.
FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable.
I?-J
"
......
.... ~~ ~-
"" t:J: '.', Ri=~
I ~'''.'''.:;:.;. -::...
I . ',-:..;,.-~":
1....___""-...-
I -Ul~~'T
I . ' " I
I I ',--, , : LL
I ~ --
I -- -.. .
- -- .
I I ..
I - ~ ,.-
~ I -
ff(OJ I - -
I
.' - -
I . -
I..DUtttCN I l.- f-- -
I ...... - - - -
I ~ - I.- ~
/L - -
I -
I ~~ - HALSEY
.. .- - -
I ~ -
'r~ I - -'
I l- I I-- ,
I W w
I -i :> :> i:> ,
I Z Z~,
I; I _W W W
I '> > >
I -~ .d-- ,
I < <
I I - n- O:
I I - -
J , li It -- ~I.-
--- I I I e9fO>J":;'-'"
--- - .
,
"- D - .--,
:-,-
-;y. - , "'" ,-
( 'Z ,: ,', {, .', '"I - -
lARINA.' IEW PARK,:~;':;I --
- (~-(---'-'~ ~ r--
- '- - - - - - -
--- - -
, ,-
f
- - ~- I-
I--
- -c.
~ \ - ~ ~EY
~ - ~ ,-
'-- - I::
f--- Z Z
,- 0 , ~ ~
~ 0 ..: Cf-
4 ..: ..J ..J
- a: c '"
- 0 0 ~
..J 0
- 0 ~
r-- (,)
!- tW , ~~.
- . . -. - - - - - . I-- ~ L ~
I-- -. ~/- ~
- . . ,- -
,- . '-- .:.- f--' .- -
. - I- - .-
- I--- l- - I--
'-
'.Attachment "A " -
=J
~ _..-
( w..11c?~L -- UNI~$I1Y
~&<~
NDR;~ ( P(/G--'1?-7~
) LOCATOR
it' e~'IA~SH.A1-..! ~')')~ll~Al.-
) ~N.-'\...l'rY ll-l fH~'I' ZONe;
RESOLUTION NO. /7/;. 3
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHUlA VISTA CITY
COUNCil APPROVING PCC-93-26, A REQUEST FOR A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A CONTINUING
EDUCATION/UNIVERSITY FACILITY AT 660 BAY
BOULEVARD IN THE I (GENERAL INDUSTRIAL) ZONING
DISTRICT
WHEREAS, a duly verified application for a conditional use permit was filed with
the City of Chula Vista Planning Department on January 28, 1993 by Foster
Properties, a General Partnership (" Applicant") in connection with a proposed lease
to National University; and,
WHEREAS, said application requests approval of a conditional use permit (pCC-
93-26) to allow a continuing education/university facility for 150 students and 10
staff per day of operation in an existing structure in the I (General Industrial) zoning
district ("Project") at 660 Bay Boulevard ("Project Site") (Attachment "A" in the Staff
Report); and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 28, 1993
and voted 4-to-1-to-2 recommending that the City Council approve subject Project;
and,
WHEREAS, the City Clerk set the time and place for a hearing on said
application and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its
publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and its mailing to property
owners within 1,000 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least ten days
prior to the hearing; and
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely
6:00 p.m. May 18, 1993 in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the
City Council and said hearing was thereafter closed; and
WHEREAS, the Commission found that the project would have no significant
environmental impacts and adopted the Negative Declaration issued on IS-93-28.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City Council of the City of
Chula Vista does hereby find:
1 . That the project will have no significant environmental impacts and adopt
the Negative Declaration issued on 15-93-28.
The City Council hereby finds that the Project will have no significant
environmental impacts in that the Project does not have:
,...
17....>
Resolution No.
Page #2
A. The potential to degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause
a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the
number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or
animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory.
B. The potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long
term, environmental goals.
C. Impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable.
D. Effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human
beings, either directly or indirectly.
The following findings are required pursuant to Section 19.14.080 of the
Municipal Code:
2. That the proposed use at the particular location is necessary or desirable
to provide a service or facility which will contribute to the general well
being of the neighborhood or the community.
The conditional approval of PCC-93-26 at the proposed location is
necessary and desirable in order to provide a service which will
contribute to the general well being of the community in that there is an
existing, under-utilized facility in place, and the service to be provided by
National University will contribute to the community by providing an
educational facility for the South Bay area.
3. That such use will not, under the circumstances of the particular case,
be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons
residing or working in the vicinity, or injurious to property or
improvements in the vicinity.
The conditional approval of PCC-93-26 will not, under the circumstances
of the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety or general
welfare of persons residing or working in the project vicinity or injurious
to property or improvements in the project vicinity in that class hours
and business hours do not conflict and adequate ingress, egress and
parking are provided thus minimizing the possibility of traffic and parking
conflicts.
F :\HOME\PLANNING\MART1N\NA TUNI\9326CC. RES
/7'~
Resolution No.
Page #3
4. That the proposed use will comply with the regulations and conditions
specified in this code for such use.
The conditional approval of PCC-93-26 complies with the regulations and
conditions of the Municipal Code in that the project is conditioned to
comply with the requirements of all applicable City departments and will
not generate excessive traffic and will provide 85 off-street parking
spaces in accordance wit the Planning Commission determination,
pursuant to the Chula Vista Municipal Code, Section 19.62.050.
5. That the granting of this conditional use permit will not adversely affect
the general plan of the City or the adopted plan of any government
agency.
The conditional approval of PCC-93-18 will not adversely affect the
General Plan, the Bayfrant Redevelopment Plan, or the Local Coastal
Program (LCP) of the City of Chula Vista in that universities are
unclassified uses which are allowed in any zoning district upon approval
of a conditional use permit. The recently approved LCP Amendment No.
11 has make the proposed use a conditionally permitted use under the
LCP.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL hereby grants
conditional use permit PCC-93-25 subject to the following conditions whereby the
applicant shall:
1. Improve the Project Site with the Project for a maximum of 150 students
and 10 staff per day of operation.
2. Submit an application to amend this conditional use permit and the
Negative Declaration issued on IS-93-28 at such time as National
University plans to enlarge the student and staff population beyond 150
students and 10 staff. If it cannot be shown that parking is adequate,
National University shall limit its student and staff population to the
maximum approved at that time.
3. Prior to allowing occupancy by National University:
A. Provide a minimum of 8 bike parking spaces (1 space for every 20
students). the location of which shall be approved by the Director
of Planning.
F :\HOME\PLANNING\MARTIN\NA TUN 1\9326CC. RES
17"/
Resolution No.
Page #4
B. Comply with and implement all requirements of the Chula Vista
Municipal Code and applicable Fire Department and Building
Department requirements, as appropriate.
C. Paint the curbs at the southern and northern entrances red and
post "NO PARKING" signs.
4. This permit shall be subject to any and all new, modified or deleted
conditions imposed after approval of this permit to advance a legitimate
governmental interest related to health, safety or welfare which the City
shall impose after advance written notice to the Permittee and after the
City has given to the Permittee the right to be heard with regard thereto.
However, the City, in exercising this reserved right/condition, may not
impose a substantial expense or deprive Permittee of a substantial
revenue source which the Permittee can not, in the normal operation of
the use permitted, be expected to economically recover.
5. This conditional use permit shall be in full force and effect during the
term of the lease between Applicant and National University for the use
specified herein, and any extensions thereof.
6. This conditional use permit shall become void and ineffective if not
utilized within one year form the effective date thereof, in accordance
with Section 19.14.260 of the Municipal Code. Failure to comply with
any condition of approval shall cause this permit to be reviewed by the
City for additional conditions or revocation.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL hereby grants
conditional use permit PCC-93-25 subject to the adoption of the required Coastal
Development Permit to allow subject use in the I (General Industrial) Zone as a
conditional use.
That a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the applicant.
Presented by
APpr~s Jt ~or
Bruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
Robert A. Leiter
Director of Planning
F,\HOME\PLANNING\MARTIN\NA TUN 1\9326CC. RES
J?~Y
I
~. .~ ' ~ ~
I'
o
.
o
5
~
o "
~! j !
" '
.
.;
q
.
,
,
,
,
,
. '
- ,
o
M
U)
,
,
,
< ~i: I ~" ~
, = ......
" ~
,.. UJ=>
<, .
. i. ti
C)
<t
Z
a:
<t
~
: "
,
"
.~'
J7~/
I
I
I
I
I
I .
I I
I
I
I
(iiJ1
17-Jt)
.
o (/)
> Z
.J <t:
ca .J
>- ci Q.
oCt .J W
CO IJ. (/)
o t- oCt
CD (/) W
CD .,... .J
e.
'-
'-
.
',""
.~
'i8
tt.:\ ! ~J,>--
\:eL'. e
~.. 1 ILl \"
':':I-T----"
: ~ ~
~ ;;1
1.-1 ;!
I
,___-----LJ_n. J;;'
. I ~
i
I
rKJD ~ .
~+~
J1' 9
f. _-_1. ----€
, J
~
,
~
0'
II' "U~.. -1/
.JI .....~ .)
i
I
~
/
I
i'i
:i .
-~~
!
~
.........,
17--//
:~
~~
@---
~
~
\
. L
Cl
>
..J
co
>-
<t:
co
o
<0
<0
~
\
(/)
Z
<I:
. ..J
c: Co
...I W
U. (/)
Cl <I:
Z ~.
'" ~.
\
~
f?J @/
~ y
/
Y.
-------€
2
__r.;
.- ~
-~
h .-
'0
!
I
~
--~
I
--kDJ · !
I . I
G 0
17"'/~
"-' ,,-'<-""::', "':~~." ;.(~~. .~:'"<
"'-:"?"~:'":...""
.
c a:
> 0
..J 0 f
ce ..I
> LL ~
<l: l-
ce (/),
0 a:
CO -
CO LL f
,
.
8
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
.................
..............
,
/7-1.3
I
1
. a:
0 0
.> 0
...I ...I
a3 LL
> 0 .
<l: Z
a3 0
0 (,)
<0 W
<0 (/)
.
.
~
17-I'/!"-/1.
THE CITY OF CHUU VISTA PARTY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Statement of disclosure of certain ownership interests, payments, or campaign contributions, on all matters
which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council, Planning Commission, and all other
official bodies. The following information must be disclosed:
1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the contract, i.e., contractor,
subcontractor, material supplier.
Foster Properties
priM Corporation
HSG Corporatlon
2. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is' a corporation or partnership, list the names of all
individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership
interest in the partnership.
stanley Foster
P .11ichael McDonald
Lillian Greenwald
3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is non-profit organization or a trust, list the names
of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or
trustor of the trust.
4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of the City staff,
Boards, Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months? Yes
No --X- If yes, please indicate person(s):
5. Please identify each and every person, including any agents, employees, consultants or independent
contractors who you have assigned to represent you before the City in this matter.
Bennet B. Greenwald
6. Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggregate, contributed more than $1,000 to a
Councilmember in the current or preceding election period? Yes _ No ~ If yes, state which
Councilmember( s):
Pcrsnn is defined as: "Anyindil'idua/,firm, co-partnership/joint VennlTe, association, social club,fraternal organization, corporation,
,'sl.{/fe, lnlsf, receiver, syndicme, this and any other cOlInty, c it)' and CDunT7)"(,. c i mUllicipality, district or OTher political slIbdil'isioll,
or all)' other grOlfp or combination acting as /I Ifnil."'
("OTE: AIl~ch addilion~J pages ~s necessary) .
D:>le: 1/27/93
dture Cif contractor/appl cant
ster Properties, /0 The Greenwald Compan.
Bennet B. Greenwald, President
Print or type name of contraclDr/applic:>nt
/ /4_?",,,'d
1 J .'U')OI
-
!.\ : I :.\;OlSCLOSLTXTj
negative declaration
PROJECT NAME: National University (660 Bay Boulevard)
PROJECT LOCATION: 660 Bay Boulevard, Chula Vista. The project site is located
on the west side of Bay Boulevard, north of J Street See
Exhibits 1 and 2
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 571-330-20
PROJECT APPLICAlIo'T: Bennet Greenwald, Foster Properties
CASE NO: 15-93-28 DATE: February 22, 1993
A. Proiect Settin ~
The National University site is located at 660 Bay Boulevard, and is within the Chula
Vista Bayfront (Local Coastal Program (LCP) area and the Bayfront Redevelopment Plan
Area. The building already exists, and is located on the west side of Bay Boulevard,
nonh of J Street. The project area is urbanized. Rohr Industries, Inc. surrounds the site
to the nonh, west and south; 1-5 is located on the other side of Bay Boulevard to the east.
See Exhibits 1 and 2 which show the vicinity location and site plan.
B. Proiect Description
The National University project proposes to use approximately 8,000 square feet of a
3~, '/:r~ 2J,~52 sq. ft. existing building for 7 classrooms and associated office space approximately
ISO students are expected to use this facility. The hours of National University would
be 5:30 to 10:30 p.m. on weekdays, with some academic daytime seminars or academic
activities.
The discretionary approvals required are: a Local Coastal Program (LCP) Amendment
and a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) from the City to allow the educational uses in this
Industrial:General category. Upon approval of the LCP Amendment and CUP, a Coastal
Development Permit from the City would also be required. LCP Amendment No. 11 is
presently being processed by the City, and if approved, would allow educational and child
care uses within the Industrial General category of land use, with a CUP. No change is
being proposed to the land use designation of the LCP Land Use Plan, the General Plan,
or the Bayfront Redevelopment Plan. Thus, the proposed activities do not create
inconsistency with the aforementioned plans.
C. Identification of Environmental Effects
Based on the Initial Study (attached) the City finds that there is no substantial evidence
that the Project may have a significant adverse effect on the environment. Thus, an
/ 7- J 7 -I ;:':i~
city of chula vista planning department em Of
environmental review aection (HULA VISTA
,,~
\-
A
~
\
,~
-~t16
".....
~$,
,
~~
51,
I
'"
I
I __
---~ 6Q.AT
- ~ "'''''0.
. I
~
.~ b;~~
~ I..... ~~
I~ ___
...L ~~_
I~
I~
I
I
I
I
I
1
.
.
\
\
.
.
...
EXHl BIT 1
V1C1NITY MAP
17'/8
-2.
.. ".'1
-.-...-......
-..-....."...,
,~,.\JO'....Jlr.l""".."
~
.-
"""',~
"H'.JtO'
Vf"-,q 'C'
\.q ~'-I.t
lA-'o('''9
~
IJ.01 ~_'1.J.F.,
f
. t
~ Illi '
U ill~Hl!
fl111 lil"ll
· !'" l
:i \1 ,I:U!
~ .!!i'IL
h,(h(h'j
"1~!;!1!!
. Hlt1'il1::H
tiillbl!l:
.. _ _... or ....
fr~ 11!!:U tl :1:; :~;
'.li. I!;::,!;:';:i III
l.,'! I'i> '1"--'"
i I- II! .: d:'. 1,< ;1~ ji
\" '''''1'''1
'I.: l':;\ d l!:, i'
,if:1 !:::;i! ~ t ~ ;;;', : ,:
'i"j ",ll"IIII..l"11
I I' ,; ~' ,I: \.: ,r!.: ! 11
'\', n,l'., '" Hi"
11lqJ i;!"~!!li J:11! II!
1'1' i.! 1 P r~'i ~;! '1")1 'II
I . I" 1 Jq.~ .11 HI,. ",
1'''1'1'1;' ..'If"
"1,1 'j"! "'!'I';)';
.H:l! :i:Ji-! It! ;ll! ':
Jtl::lltldj ;t~,~l !I
1
~
jf.1
I~i
I
~
, ,
. .
""II '
\ Iii I:, t
il'iII! j1n
., I-I I
r: 'i' II I
~
\
!.~
11-/ ,
-.3
EXHIBlT 2
SITE PLAN (BUILDING ALREADY CONSTRUCTED)
I~W
~
.
. <.
1 ·
, . ..
i W lio-l
. ~ ~!
~ :Ir
~. ,
I'
~ Ii 3
~ ~ii
c:.-
"'t-
c:1H
~ ~~}
a:, <
c: .
"
I
I
.....1 '
3 I. ~
z ~
c:'
..J ,
a. '
W'
=.! ~
.
i
U'> i
Ih l!~ .
_I" U! ,
JI,n (', t
I'S-- ~.,
~~.,. i~~ (
lh~ jl4 ~l'i
, j1;lt;i!J. II
</l!, ,j,~"
. - ,,( 1 .,
,~~ < .... - J~
p~ ~ :\\;Q )j
-,.. " I
1~~ofti II
~.~' Jt...t )
h~~( ~~~ .
j,
II
EnvironMental Impact Report will not be required. This Negative Declaration has been
prepared in accordance with Sections 15070 through 15073 of the State CEQA
Guidelines.
D. Mitigation necessary to avoid significant effects
The proposed project is not associated with any significant or potentially significant
environmental impacts, therefore, no project specific mitigation will be required or
necessary .
E. Consultation
1. Individuals and Organizations
,City of Chula Vista: Roger Daoust, Engineering
Cliff Swanson, Engineering
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering
Garry Williams, Planning
Maryann Miller, Planning
Ken Larsen, Director of Building & Housing
Carol Gove, Fire Marshal
Captain Keith Hawkins, Police Department
Marti Schmidt, Parks & Recreation Dept.
Pamela Buchan, Community Development Dept.
Rich Rudolf, Assistant City Attorney
.
Chula Vista City School District: Kate Shurson
Sweetwater Union High School District: Tom Silva
Applicant's Agent: Mr. Bennett Greenwald, Foster Properties
2. Documents
Chula Vista General Plan (1989) and EIR (1989)
Title 19, Chula Vista Municipal Code
Chula Vista Bayfront Local Coastal Program (amended 1989)
Bayfront Redevelopment Project Plan (1974)
Revised Traffic Impact Analysis for proposed National University Project (KMB
Consulting, February 16, 1993)
-, 1'1"~
Page 2
""PC F:\HOME'CO'P,IDE\ ,,\'if;l. 9:'1
3. Initial Studv
This environmental determination is based on the attached Initial Study, any
comments received on the Initial Study and any comments received during the
public review period for the Negative Declaration. The report reflects the
independent judgment of the City of Chula Vista. Further information regarding
the environmental review of this project is available from the Chula Vista
Planning Department, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 92010.
/k-.r.aJ 4u~uU,J
ENVIRONMENT ALREVIEW COORDINATOR
EN 6 (Rev. 12/90)
Attachments: Vicinity Map
Site Plan
-..5
>, ~ ~
WPC F:\HOME\COM~IDE\'\!i~193
11-- z. /
Page 3
APPENDIX I
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
(To Be Completed By Lead Agency)
Background
1. Name of Proponent: Foster Prooerties c/o the Greenwald Company
2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 740 Bav Boulevard, Suite 200, Chula Vista. CA 91910
3. Date of Checklist: 2-17-93
4. Name of Proposal: National University
5. Initial Study Number: IS-93-28
Envlronmenlal Impacts
1. Eanh. Will the proposal resuit in:
YES MAYBE NO
g.
a.
Unstable earth conditions or changes
in geologic substructures?
.
o
o
b.
Disruptions, displacements, compaction
or overcovering of the soil?
.
o
o
c.
Change in topography or ground surface
relief features?
.
o
o
d.
The destruction, covering or
modification of any unique geologic
or physical features?
.
o
o
e.
Any increase in wind or water erosion
of soils, either on or off the site?
.
o
o
f.
Changes in deposition or erosion of
beach sands, or changes in siitation,
deposition or erosion which may modHy
the channel of a river or stream or the
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or
lake?
.
o
o
Exposure of people or property to
geologic hazards such as earthquakes,
landslides, mud slides, ground failure,
or similar hazards?
o
o
.
Comments:
The National University (660 Bay Boulevard) project would be located in a building that is already
constructed. ParKing would be located on the existing parKing lot. Thus, no disturbance to the
ground would be necessary to achieve this project, and no signHicant impacts would occur.
14
-4t
11~
2. Air. Will the proposal resu~ in: YES MAYBE NO
a. Substantial air emissions or
deterioration of ambient air
qualrty? Cl Cl .
b. The creation of objectionable
odors? Cl Cl .
c. Meralion of air movement,
moisture, or temperature, or any
change in climate, either locally
or regionally? Cl Cl .
Comments:
The National University Project would not directly produce any emissions, as the building
already exists, and the uses will be classroom. Vehicles accessing the site produce
emissions, but as shown in the attached Traffic Impact Analysis, the University-related trips
are minimally greater than trips associated with commercial-office uses (at most, 380
trips/day greater), and occur during the off-peak times. Additionally, it is anticipated that
this National University location would relieve longer distance trips to other parts of the
county, thereby reducing the amount of emissions associated with these trips. No
signHicant air quality impact is thus expected.
3.
Water. Will the Proposal resu~ in:
YES MAYBE NO
a.
Changes in currents, or the course
or direction of water movements,
in either marine or fresh waters?
.
Cl
Cl
b.
Changes in absorption rates,
drainage patterns, or the rate
and amount of surface runoff?
.
Cl
Cl
c.
A~erations to the course or flow
of flood waters?
.
Cl
Cl
d.
Change in the amount of surface
water in any water body?
.
[J
[J
e.
Discharge into surface waters, or
any a~eration of surface water
quality, including but not limited
to temperature, dissolved oxygen
or turbidity?
.
[J
[J
f.
A~eration of the direction or
rate of flow of ground waters?
.
[J
[J
g.
Change in the quantity of ground
waters, either through direct
additions or withdrawals, or
through interception of an aquHer
by cuts or excavations?
.
[J
[J
-7
15
17'~J
h.
Substantial reduction in the
<''flount of water otherwise
available for public water
supplies?
.
o
o
i.
Exposure of people or property to
water related hazards such as
flooding or tidal waves?
.
o
o
Comments:
The National UniversHy project would not affect, nor be affected by water movements.' The project
sHe is already constructed, and has sufficient drainage systems to convey runoff (see Engineering
Department Routing Form). Thus. no signnicant impacts to water movements would occur.
Regarding water supply, the National UniversHy project would not use water other than to service
typical personal needs, and would not consume unusually large amounts of water. Thus, no
signnicant impacts to water supply would occur.
4.
Plant Life. Will the proposal resun in:
~ MAYBE NO
a.
Change in the diversHy of species,
or number of any species of plants
(including trees, shrubs, grass,
crops, and aquatic plants)?
.
o
o
b.
Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species
of plants?
.
o
o
c.
Introduction of new species of
plants into an area, or in a
barrier to the normal replenish-
ment of existing species?
.
o
o
d.
Reduction in acreage of any
agricunural crop?
.
o
o
Comments:
The National University project would not affect biological resources as the facility is already buin,
and no change in building structure or exterior lighting will occur. The entire project site and
immediate surrounding area is urbanized and supports no substantial natural resources.
5.
Animal Life. Will the proposal resun in:
~ MAYBE NO
a.
b.
Change in the diversHy of species,
or numbers of any species of
animals (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and
shelHish, benthic organisms or
insects)?
o
o
.
Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species
of animals?
o
o
.
-8
16
17~
c.
Introduction of new species of
animals into an area, or resu~
in a barrier to the migration or
movement of animals?
o
o
.
d.
Deterioration to existing fish or
wildlrte habrtat?
o
o
.
Comments:
The National University project would not affect biological resources as the facility is already bui~,
and no change in building structure or exterior lighting will occur. The entire project srte and
immediate surrounding area is urbanized and supports no substantial natural resources.
6. Noise. Will the proposal resu~ in: YES MAYBE NO
a. Increases in existing noise
levels? 0 0 .
b. Exposure of people to severe
noise levels? 0 0 .
Comments:
The National University project would be located in an existing building. Potential noise
impacts to students of this facility would be avoided as the classrooms are located inside,
and protected from the high noise levels associated wrth 1-5. Traffic noise from vehicles
accessing the srte would be insignrticant, and overwhelmed by the adjacent freeway noise.
Also, no sensrtive receptors are located along the anticipated route of travel which is 1-5
to J Street and north on Bay Boulevard.
7.
Light and Glare. Will the proposal
produce new light or glare?
YES MAYBE NO
o D.
Comments:
The National Universrty facilrty would create no new exterior lighting. Vehicles, however, would be
present until 10:30 p.m., creating new lighting from vehicle headlights. The pa1hs of travel along
Bay Boulevard and J Street are not adjacent to residences or to wetland resources of the bay.
Thus, no signrticant lighting impacts are expected.
8.
Land Use. Will the proposal resurt in
a substantial arteration of the present
or planned land use of an area?
YES MAYBE NO
o
o
.
Comments:
The National Universrty educational uses would be located in a building constructed for
office uses. Classrooms for education are different than the previously anticipated uses,
thus requiring the CUP and the Local Coastal Program (lCP) Amendment. lCP
Amendment No. 11 is presently being processed to allow educational and child care uses
wrth a CUP in the General Industrial Land Use category of the Bayfront lCP area. Since
no land use designation changes are necessary for this project, no changes to the land
17
-1
/7 - .25"
use designations of the Bayfront LCP, the City's General Plan or Redevelopment Plan are
proposed.
9.
Natural Resources. Will the proposal resu~ in:
YES MAYBE NO
a.
Increase in the rate of use of any
natural resources?
[J
[J
.
Comments:
The National University uses would not create a substantial increase in the use of natural
resources. In fact, the buildings are already bum, thus, occupation and use of the structure
is not a significant new source of natural resource consumption.
10.
Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve:
YES MAYBE NO
a.
A risk of an explosion or the
release of hazardous substances
(including, but not limited to oil,
pesticides, chemicals or radiation)
in the event of an accident or
upset conditions?
[J
[J
.
b.
Possible interference with an
emergency response plan or an
emergency evacuation plan?
[J
D
.
Comments:
National University is not expected to use hazardous substances as part of the curriculum.
However, use of such substances is regulated by the County Department of Health Services,
Hazardous Materials Management Division, and by the City's Fire Department. Any use of such
materials requires documentation of the safe use and disposal of these materials. No other
regulation is necessary.
11.
Population. Will the proposal a~er
the location, distribution, density,
or growth rate of the human population
of an area?
YES MAYBE NO
D
D
.
Comments:
The location of National University in this facility would not substantially a~er the populationlhousing
structure of the area, as this facility is being proposed to provide a location for an existing need
for educational facilities in this portion of the County.
12.
Housing. Will the proposal affect
existing housing, or create a demand
for additional housing?
YES MAYBE NO
D
D
.
Comments:
The location of National University in this facility would not substantially a~er the populationlhousing
structure of the area, as this facility is being proposed to provide a location for an existing need
for educational facilities in this portion of the County.
18
-Ie
/7-2'
13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal resu~ in: YES MAYBE NO
a. Generation of substantial
additional vehicular movemerrt? Cl Cl .
b. Effects on existing parking
facilities, or demand for new
parking? Cl Cl .
c. . Substantial impact upon existing
transportation systems? Cl Cl .
d. A~erations to preserrt patterns of
circulation or movement of people
and/or goods? Cl Cl .
e. A~erations to waterborne, rail or
air traffic? Cl Cl .
f. Increase in traffic hazards to
motor vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians? Cl Cl .
g. A "large project" under the
Congestion Management Program?
(An equivalent of 2400 or more
average daily vehicle trips or
200 or more peak.hour vehicle
tnps). Cl Cl .
Comments:
See "Revised Traffic Impact Analysis for Proposed National University Project: attached. The
conclusions of this report is that no signrticant traffic circulation Impacts would occur.
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or resu~ in a need for new or a~ered
governmental services in any of the following areas:
YES MAYBE NO
a. Fire protection? Cl Cl .
b. Police protection? [J [J .
c. Schools? Cl [J .
d. Parks or other recreational
facilities? [J [J .
e. Maintenance of public facilities,
including roads? Cl Cl .
f. Other governmerrtal services? [J . [J
19
_1/
17- ..2 7
Comments:
a.
15.
a.
b.
Fire Protection: 1) National Univers~y building already meets Fire Department
requirements for oc:cupancy. No add~ional requirements. (See Fire Department
Routing form).
b.
Police Protection: Police services will not be signKicantly affected by the operation of the
proposed National Univers~y project; no impacts have been identKied by the Police
Department.
c.
Schools: National Univers~y creates no impact to elementary and secondary schools
because no students would be generated. Since no new construction is associated w~h
the National Univers~ project, no statutory fees are required. This facil~y is providing
educational facil~ies to serve needs, resu~ing in beneficial school impacts.
d.
ParKslRecreation: No demand for parKs/recreation would be a resu~ of this project (see
ParKs Department routing form). Also, public access to the recreational resources of the
Bayfront would not be affected by the proposal.
e.
Public Facil~ies Maintenance: National Univers~y would not substantially affect public
facilities, thus not requiring additional maintenance.
1.
Water: New water infrastructure, or substantial a~eration to the existing water
infrastructure may be necessary to provide the National Univers~y s~e w~h water for fire
flow requirements. This is not considered a potential environmental impact, rather a
necess~y to coordinate water planning between the C~'s Fire Department and the
Sweetwater Author~y which provides water service. Based on Sweetwater Author~y's
Standard procedures, the applicant must subm~ a letter to Sweetwater Author~y stating
Chula Vista Fire Department fire flow requirements. Sweetwater Author~y will then
determine the abil~y of the system to provide the required fire flow. Facility improvements
may be required. which would be the responsibil~y of the applicant to provide. Occupancy
perm~s would not be issued by the C~y until fire flow is assured. This is standard
Sweetwater Author~y and C~y procedure, and not m~igation required as a resu~ of any
environmental impact.
g.
Sewer: Sewer facil~ies are adequate 10 serve the National Univers~y project (see
Engineering Department routing form).
Energy. Will the proposal resu~ in:
YES MAYBE NO
Use of substantial amount of fuel
or energy?
[J
[J
.
Substantial increase in demand
upon existing sources or energy,
or require the development of new
sources of energy?
[J
[J
.
Comments:
Substantial amounts of new fuel would not be required to operate the proposed
educational facility.
20
- I 2../7-i1. e
16.
Thresholds. Will the proposal
adversely impact the C~y's Threshold!
Standards Policies?
YES MAYBE NO
D
D
.
Comments:
As described below, the proposed educational facility does not adversely impact any of the eleven
Threshold Standards.
A. Fire/EMS
The Threshold Standard requires that fire and medical units must be able to respond to
calls w~hin 7 minutes or less in 85% of the cases and w~hin 5 minutes or less in 75% of
the cases. The C~y of Chula Vista has indicated that this threshold standard will be met,
since the nearest fire station is approximately 3 miles away and would be associated w~h
a 5 minute response time. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard.
B. Police
The Threshold Standard requires that police units must respond to 84% of Priority 1 calls
within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority 1 calls of 4.5
minutes or less. Police units must respond to 62% of Priority 2 calls within 7 minutes or
less and maintain an average response time to all Priority 2 calls of 7 minutes or less. The
proposed project will comply w~h this Threshold Standards as the Police Department has
indicated that their ability to meet response time would not be adversely affected by this
project.
C. Traffic
The Threshold Standard requires that all intersections must operate at a Level of Service
(LOS) "C" or betler, with the exception that Level of Service (LOS) "0" may occur during
the peak two hours of the day at signaliZed intersections. Intersections west of 1-805 are
not to operate at a LOS below their t987 LOS. No intersection may reach LOS "E" or "F"
during the average weekday peak hour. Intersections of arterials with freeway ramps are
exempted from this policy. The traffic generated by this proposed project will comply with
this Threshold Standard. See attached traffic report, KMB Consuiting, for detailed
comments.
D. Parks/Recreation
The Threshold Standard for Parks and Recreation is 3 acres/l,OOO population. The
proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard; as it is not applicable, since no
new population will be generated.
E. Drainage
The Threshold Standard requires that storm water flows and volumes not exceed City
Engineer Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary improvements consistent
with the Drainage Master Plan(s) and C~y Engineering Standards. The proposed project
will comply with this Threshold Standard, as the National University site is already
adequately drained.
21 17"~9
-I:J
F. Sewer
The Threshold Standard requires that sewage flows and volumes not exceed City
Engineering Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary improvements consistent
with Sewer Master Plan(s) and City Engineering Standards. The proposed project will
comply with this Threshold Standard, as the National University site has adequate sewer
infrastructure.
G. Water
The Threshold Standard requires that adequate storage, treatment, and transmission
facilities are constructed concurrently with planned growth and that water quality standards
are not jeopardized during growth and construction. The proposed National University
project applicant must worl< with the City's Fire Department and Sweetwater Authority to
ensure that adequate infrastructure is available. Proot of adequacy must be given to the
City"s Planning Department prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. This is standard
City procedure, and not a mitigation measure required by this Negative Declaration.
H. Schools
Tr,e Threshold Standard requires that the City provide the school districts with a 12 to 18
month development forecast, and request student absorption ability information from the
districts. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard as it does affect
it. The proposed project does not generate students or create impacts on the school
districts' abilrties to accommodate students.
I. libraries
The Threshold Standard requires 500 square feet of library space per 1,000 population.
The proposed project does not generate addrtional population and will comply wrth this
Threshoid Standard because it does nol affect it.
J. Air Qualrty
The Threshold Standard requires that the 'City provide the San Diego Air Pollution Control
District with a 12 to 18 month development forecast, and request an evaluation of its
impact on air quality and management plans. The proposed project will comply with this
Threshold Standard. The proposed project will not create air quality impacts.
K. Fiscal
The Threshold Standard requires that the Growth Management Oversight Committee be
provided with an annual report which provides an evaluation of fiscal impacts of growth on
the City. The proposed project does not directly affect this Threshold Standard, though
implementation of the project and its fiscal effect will be included within the annual report
and evaluation.
17.
Human Health. Will the proposal resutt in:
YES MAYBE NO
a.
Creation of any heatth hazard or
potential heaith hazard (excluding
mental heaith)?
o
o
.
22
-It{
17-30
b.
Exposure Of people to potential
heaHh hazards?
.
D
D
Comments:
No human hea~h hazard would be created by classroom uses of National University, nor would
the students be exposed to any human health hazard in the existing 660 Bay Boulevard building.
18.
Aesthetics. Will the proposal result
in the obstruction of any scenic vista
or view open to the public. or will the
proposal resuH in the creation of an
aesthetically offensive site open to
public view?
YES MAYBE NO
D
D
.
Comments:
Occupation of the 660 Bay Boulevard building by National University would not change the
aesthetic nature of the project area.
19.
Recreation. Will the proposal resuH
in an impact upon the quality or
quantity of existing recreational
opportunities?
YES MAYBE NO
D
D
.
Comments:
No demand for parks/recreation would be a resu~ of this project (see Parks Department routing
form). Also, public access to the recreational resources of the Baytront would not be affected by
the proposal.
20.
Cultural Resources.
YES MAYBE NO
a.
Will the proposal resuH in the
alteration of or the destruction
of a prehistoric or historic
archaeological site?
.
D
D
b.
Will the proposal resuH in
adverse physical or aesthetic
effects to a prehistoric or
historic building, structure, or
object?
.
D
D
c.
Does the proposal have the
potential to cause a physical
change which would affect unique
ethnic cultural values?
.
D
D
d.
Will the proposal restrict
existing religious or sacred uses
within the potential impact area?
.
D
D
Comments:
The National University project would be located in the existing 660 Bay Boulevard building: no
impacts to cuHural resources would occur.
17-31
-15
23
21.
Mandatory Findings of Significance.
YES MAYBE NO
a.
Does the project have the potenlial
to degrade the quality of the
environmenl, substanlially reduce
the habitat of a fish or wildlite
species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below seij
sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a planl or animal
community, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of
the major periods of Calitornia
history or prehistory?
.
Cl
Cl
Comments:
Based on the analysis contained in the Initial Study no signiticanl impacts were found to occur to
biological or cultural resources because the National University project would not disturb any part
of the natural environment, nor are there any cuitural resources at the project site.
b.
Does the project have the
potential to achieve short-term,
to the disadvantage or long-term,
environmental goals? (A short-
term impact on the environment is
one which occurs in a relatively
brief, definitive period of time
while long.term impacts will
endure well into the future.)
.
Cl
Cl
Comments:
The project would implement long-term goals of the City's plans regarding establishment of
necessary facilities, especially because the existing building is already developed for use, but is
empty. Additionally, no loss of natural resources which could provide long term environmenlal
benefits would be affected by this project.
c.
Does the project have impacts
which are individually limited,
but cumulatively considerable?
(A project may impact two or more
separate resources where the
impact on each resource is
relatively small, bul where the
effect of the total of those
impacts on the environmenl is
signiticant.)
Cl
Cl
.
24
-/~ 17-!J&.
Comments:
The analysis contained in the Initial Study found no cumulative impacts, and found no individual
impacts.
d.
Does the project have
environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, e~her directly
or indirectly?
[]
[].
.
Comments:
The analysis contained in the In~ial Study found that no direct or indirect adverse effects would
occur to human beings from the National Univers~y project. The issues relevant to this finding
included air qualrty, water, noise, Iigh1 and glare, land use compatibility, risk of upset,
population/housing, traffic, public services, human heatth, aesthetics, and natural hazards (earth).
25 17--33
-17
III. Detemlnation
(To be completed by the Lead Agency. Check one box only.)
On the basis of this inttial evaluation:
. I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment,
and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
CJ I find that a~hough the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment,
there will not be a significant effect In this case because the mitigation measures described
on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED.
CJ I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
<../7 .
7:u,-.(L /
Date
/7n
tk t
.I ;, I ~
"(<-.1-'-L) ....Z-(l.a.~:li'__
Signature
For
(~A L/. OC<J", U,sb-
!)
26
-18/7-34-
DE MINIMIS FEE DETERMINATION
(Chapter 1706, Slatutes ot 1990 . AS 3158)
. It is hereby found that this project involves no potential for any adverse effect, e~her individually
or cumulatively on wildl~e resources and that a .Certificate of Fee Exemption" shall be prepared
for this project.
[J It is hereby found that this project could potentially impact wildlife, individually or aJmulatively and
therefore fee in accordance w~h Section 711.4 (d) of the Fish and Game Code shall be paid to the
County Clerk.
~{;~\CV [.LC/~:;___
Environmental Review Coordinator
~v:..4. I, /9 73
Date
WPC F \HOME\COMMDEV'642 93
27
-11
11-~
SUBJECT:
-r',
n"
KMB Consulting
Traffic Enp,ineer"8 f Transportation Planning. Impact Studies
""., .
February 16, 1993
Ms. Diana Rich
City of Chula Vist
Community Develop ent Department
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
FFIC IMPACT AN YSIS FOR PROPOSED NATIONAL
OJECT
Dear Ms. Richardson:
In a previous letter dated Decem r 22, 1 92, KMB Consulting presented the results of
study addressing potential traffi im cts associated with the proposed use of
approximately 8,000 square feet of a isting building located at 740 Bay Boulevard by
National University. We understand t National University subsequently withdrew their
application, and that they are now op ing a similar facility at 660 Bay Boulevard in
Chula Vista. The proposed proje remai substantially unchanged from the previous
project submittal. Therefore, w have con uded that the National University project.
would not result in significant dditional tra generation to the surrounding street
system.
The proposed National Uni rsity project would inv ve the operation of a not-for-profit
college level institution wi in an existing building 10 ted at 660 Bay Boulevard in the
City of Chula Vista The operty is within the coastal z e. Current permitted uses for
the site include genera Industrial and industrial/busines park uses, as well as other
specialized uses iden ied in the Bayfront Specific Plan d Local Coastal Program
(LCP).
The existing buildi is a traditional multi-tenant office building. hough located within
the general indus lal zone which permits various industrial and limit commercial uses,
buildings such this are typically occupied by non-industrial, "com rcial office" uses.
National Uni rsity proposes to occupy 8,000 square feet of the existing building. The
applicant anticipates operating six to seven classrooms which would each serve an
average of 20 to 25 students, for a total anticipated student population of 150 students.
National University is an institution which primarily serves working adults, so that classes
are generally at night
_2-D 17-3b
qbbh BU~lnt"'~ P.Hk 0\\ t'nut'- SlIile 10- . 5an DIt'20. CA 92131 . \619! 689.49-14 . F,-\\ 1619! 689.-499-4
Ms. Diana Richardson
City of Chula Vista
February 16, 1993
Page Two
The proposed project would offer classes between 5:30 p.m. and 10:00 p.m. weekdays,
but would also hold some daytime seminars and academic activities at the site.
Exhibit 1 summarizes expected traffic generation which would result from the National
University project, and compares this traffic generation to trips which would be expected
without the project, assuming the space were occupied by an office use. Assuming that
the average daytime student population is 150 students, or approximately equivalent to
the expe:::ted night z-ttendanc3, university' activities would generate approximately 540
daily trips. This is based on the assumption that night classes would generate traffic at
a rate of 2 trips per student (a worst case, assuming that each student is in attendance
and drives alone), and that daytime activities would generate traffic at a rate of 1.6 trips
per student. The rate of 1.6 trips per student is consistent with the average trip
generation rate published by the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) in
the San Dieqo Traffic Generators manual for 2-year, junior colleges.
When project traffic generation is compared to trips that would be generated by
commercial office uses, using the average trip generation rates for commercial offices
published by SANDAG, Exhibit 1 shows that the project would result in an increase of
approximately 380 daily trips to the surrounding street system. In the vicinity of the
project, Bay Boulevard, a Class II Collector street, would be most impacted by project.
Bay Boulevard currently carries between 3,400 and 4,100 vehicles per day based on the
most recent daily traffic volume counts for this roadway (1991). These daily volumes are
well within the maximum level of service C daily traffic volume of 12,000 vehicles per day
for Class II Collector streets given in the City of Chula Vista's published Roadway
Capacity Standards. Additional traffic which would result from the proposed project
would represent at most an increase of 9 to 11 percent on Bay Boulevard, and impacts
would be localized. Therefore, project traffic would not constitute a significant addition
to area traffic volumes. During the critical peak hours, the project would result in only
a nominal increase in traffic during the morning peak hour and in approximately 148
additional trips in the afternoon peak hour. It should be noted that the increase in
afternoon peak hour traffic would be in the inbound direction, while existing
industrial/business related uses in the area generate primarily outbound traffic in the
afternoon peak hour. Since morning peak hour project-generated traffic would be
minimal and since afternoon peak hour project traffic would be in the opposite direction
of existing peak traffic flows, the project is not expected to significantly impact area traffic
operations or level of service.
In summary, the proposed National University project would not result in significant
additional traffic generation to the surrounding street system.
-2{
1/ -37
Ms. Diana Richardson
City of Chula Vista
February 16, 1993
Page Three
Please call me if you have any questions, or if you would like additional information.
Sincerely,
KMB CONSULTING
Q/~ -/J? e5~
Kristi M. Berg, P.E.
Attachment
-2'2.
I 7 -33
Use
EXHIBIT 1
TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY
NATIONAL UNIVERSITY
Inlanslty
TRIP GENERATION RATES (a)
Avaraga Waakday AM Paak (b) PM Paak (b)
-1EP...!!.~L~ 1!! Out !'! Out
Existlna Uses ld)
12.6% 1.4%
8,000 SF
20 trips/KSF
ProPosed Uses
Nationftl University. Night Classes t 50 students
National Univ@rslty - Oey Chtsses 150 students
I
III
\AJ (a)
(bl
(e)
(d)
2.0 trips/ST (e)
1.6 trips 1ST
NIA NIA
10,8% 1.2%
Source: Ssn Diego TraH;e GenlmJtors. San Ofego AssocittHon of Governments, Jufy 1992.
Expressed as II percentage of daily trips.
Trip generaffonnttes were estimated.
Uses which would be expected to occupy SplIc. proposed for Nttt7ontl' University facility.
NOTE: SF = Squara Feet; KSF = Thousand Squora Feet ST = Students,
---
"-'
l\j
~
2.6%
10.4%
50.0% (e) 0.0% (e)
24% 5.6%
SUbtot81 =
Difference from Existing =
Average
Weekday TrlD.
160
300
240
540
+ 3110
TRIP GENERATION
AM Peak
!!! Oul
20
o
26
26
+s
PM Paak
!!! Oul
2
o
~
150
~
Commercial Office
3
156
+ 1
+152 .4
4
17
o
13
13
ROUTING FORM
DATE: February 12, 1993
,
TO:
Ken Larson, Building & Housing
John Lippitt, Engineering (EIR only)
Cliff Swanson, Engineering (EIR only)
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering (EIR only)
Roger Daoust, Engineering (IS/3, EIR/2)
Richard Rudolf, Assistant City Attorney (EIR only)
Carol Gove, Fire Department
Marty Schmidt, Parks & Recreation
Keith Hawkins, Police Department
Current Planning ~
Frank Herrera, Advance Planning
Bob Sennett, City Landscape Architect
Bob Leiter, Planning Diri!ctor
Chula Vista Elementary School District, Kate Shurson
Sweetwater Union H.S. District, Tom Silva (IS & EIR)
Maureen Roeber, Library (Final EIR)
Other
.
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Maryann Mi ller
Environmental Section
KD
D
o
D
Appl ication for Initial Study (IS- 93-28
Checkprint Draft EIR (20 days)(EIR-
Review of a Draft EIR (EIR-
Review of Environmental Review Record
IFA- 615
IFB-
IFB-
FC-
lOP -
lOP
lOP
IERR-
997 )
)
)
)
The proje:t consJsts of:
This office building is existing and the project
proposes to use 8,000 sq. ft. for National University
of Classroom and associated office use. 150 expected
students wi~h 7 classrooms.
Location:
660 Bay 80ulevard
Please review the document and forward to me any comments you have by 2/19/93
."
()L' "._ D~
Co-n ~CJJ l.AA-.{-' ~
~ ~ k /7-40
-;'/7-4{/:5
- 2.'f /
COlm1ents:
/'
y<:; -Sfo (
G. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Case No. IS...q3-~
1. Ora; naQe
a.
Is the project site within a flood plain? YtG.
If so, state which FEMA Floodway Frequency Boundary ~~~~~OklEVER
I7-IE "fStJf/..DI/..16 "PAD ,-:, ".i><JFFIc.t~Tl....Y A~ -n+E. I - t:>>VAY I
P/z'!"'6E TO CJ;MpW IVIT7f A::MA A/JD CoMMLlfJf7Y Sf"AfJDA-Rt:>$.
What is the location and description of existing on-site
drainage facilities? <;;'lJ~ ~w T7) BtIV ___,<LV""......, A/..!'D""Tr> (f,~
~WAL.E PAI<A./IC',-- In W(:<::'~D/ V ~...mv t..IA1~ .
b.
c.
Are they adequate to serve the project? YlO~.
If not, explain briefly. "'/A
d.
What is the location and description of existing off-site
drainage facilitieS?
e.
Are they adequate to serve the project? y~~.
If not, exp la i n bri efly. -i1-4
2. TransDortation
c.
a. What roads provide primary access to the project? BAY BOLlL-EVARD
ANn ",Tn ';TREtr -
b. What is the estimated number of one-way auto trips to be
generated by the project (per day)? 3t""B A!>T eVER. EXf~AI~ {~.
What is the ADT and estimated
project completion?
Before
A.D.T. BAy SouU=:VAeJ">_ '12'10
~:r" ~T7Z.Eer - 73'2.0
l.O.S. B<\Y Eb<.J(.8I~ -/.-OS ':4"
-vlt t;ror~ - LD~ '~"
level of service before and after
After
'ICSA
7bP,fJ,
Loc "A"
l-oS ':4"
If the A.D.T. or l.O.S. is unknown or not applicable, explain
briefly. NIA
,
d. Are the primary access roads adequate to serve the project? If
not, explain briefly. YE~.
WPC 9459P
17- 41
-14-
-as
Y5 -56/
Case No. TS-43-2B
e.
Are there any intersecti ons at or near the poi nt that will
result in an unacceptable level of Service (lOS)?uo.
If so, identify: location ~/A
Cumulative l.O.S. J{t4
AIJ II:(.REvDCA6t.e OF~ OF bft:>Ic::AT(Do.J
Is there any dedication required? MAY l!l€ 1?J:'-"<JJt'lEt>. ......
If so, please specify. 84.Y'R.->vl'V~~ t:ESr~Tl<hAc, A t"Ju',srr CoL.l..ecroIL
WIT'-l 'Rrlr/.&'WAY'; ,"" 'r'tIE t:.~~1lAL. FLA,]. ~,1="z;:-tc.(~a.Jr l:JE'blc.&.~11">>..1 M,lIl\Y J;k- l?rlA.l' _~
. I~/~
~ ME:Er WE H4t..F-W(l7rH !;rAJ.lq,J,,/2.r:6 OF s..,/:> r>ESIH.l,A.rr~
Is there any street widening required? fJn.
If so, please specify. ^>IA
f.
g.
,
h. Are there any other street improvements required? 110..
If so, please specify the general nature of the necessary
improvements. ^CIA
3. Soils t-IA. EXI'f,TING 'BUll-DINt;. AID NEW t:.c^lS~Uc.nblJ 1<;' PRDfOfEt::,.
a. Are there any anticipated adverse geotechnical conditions on the
project site?
b. If yes, specify these conditions.
c. Is a soils report necess~ry?
4.
land Form
<;'~'PE:D 2<;/0
a. What is the average Rityral slope of the site?
b. What is the maximum ~:tW'~ slope of the site? 5"0%, (P1IESrERLY 5LdE).
Noise
5.
Are there any traffic-related noise levels impacting the site that
are significant enough to justify that a noise analysis be required
of the applicant? NO.
6. Waste Generation
How much sol id and 1 iquid
proposed project per day?
1-10 CI-/;AN~ IN 5,;>t..ID
Solid WASr;;: GFIJFfAr(~
(sewage) waste wi 11 be generated by the
'fZ5 Bo4LLc""<>/l:lqY {I.~ El>IJ)OV~
l i aui d €l<1!';r/"'~ =-1'" -'"- ~~E:/2A.'r-"x.J
What is the location and size of existing. sewer lines on or
downstream from the site? 2./" (f>..r~ 'PIPE AU't..S1:; WF'&;77;,<t..V PlZop,=Qry
U/oJt: wu Ie," L>/.::;rl-ltFV--!"4""77) 7Z"UF'r'RD $f;Wa. 'DoWN!:'rIiEA..-r.
,
Are they adequate to serve the proposed project? YS05.
WPC 9~59P
-15-
-~(,
I 7- 42-
YS -5(,;,/
Case No. IS -"1"3-2g,
7. Remarks
IIPe 9459P
Please identify and discuss any remalnlng potential adverse impacts,
mitigation measures, or other issues.
City
0l.,/10!'13
Date I
I
\
eer or Representative
\
-16-
- ";7
17-- 4::>
---'
Case No. Is- 7'.?-~
H-l. PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
1. Is project su "ect to Parks & Recreation Threshold requirements?
If not, please xplain.
Provide land?
Pay a fee?
6. Remarks:
are necessary to serve he proposed
2. How many acres of
project?
3. Are existing neighborhoo
adequate to serve the popula
Neighborhood
Community Parks
community parks near the project
increase resul g from this project?
4. If not, are parkland dedications
of the project adequate
Neighborhood
Community Parks
To meet City reqUireme~ will
er mitigation proposed as part
pop lation increase?
s.
~~ --s.~
Parks'and Recreation Director or Representative
";2 .L 1 . f ~
Date
WPC 0413p/9~59?
-13.
-:18
i T-4 4
ROUTING FORM
DATE: February 12, 1993
....
, TO:
Ken larson, Building & Housing
John lippitt, Engineering (EIR only)
Cliff Swanson, Engi~~ering (EIR only)
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering (EIR only)
Roger Daoust, Engineering (IS/3, EIR/2)
JJ Richard Rudolf, Assistant City Attorney (EIR only)
Carol Gove, Fire Department
Marty Schmidt, Parks & Recreation
Keith Hawkins, Police Department
Current Planning
Frank Herrera, Advance Planning
Bob Sennett, City landscape Architect
Bob leiter, Planning Director
Chula Vista Elementary School District, Kate Shurson
Sweetwater Union H.S. District, Tom Silva (IS & EIR)
Maureen Roeber, library (Final EIR)
Othe r
FROM; Maryann Miller Environmental Section
SUBJECT ; m Application for Initial Study (IS-93-28 IFA-6l5 lOP - 997 )
D Checkprint Draft EIR (20 days)(EIR- IFB- lOP )
0 Review of a Draft EIR (E1 R- IFB- lOP )
D Review of Environmental Review Record FC- IERR- )
The project cons.ists of:
This office building is existing and the project
proposes to use 8,000 sq. ft. for National University
of Classroom and associated office use. 150 expected
students wi~h 7 classrooms.
location:
660 Bay Boulevard
Please review the document and forward to me any comments you have by 2/19/93
Corrcnents:
.,
/ ~~~'S
-r
\~.
~~
~ ~"'.
-a1
I '"
/7 -4~-
Case No. J"S. 9.?- ~ P
H. FIRE DEPARTMENT
1. What is the distance to the nearest fire station? ~ what is the
Fire Dep~tment's estimated reaction time?
..s_;c:~ ~,..,,:.; .
2. Will the Fire Department be able to provide an adequate level of fire
protection for the roposed facility without an increase in equipment
or personnel? _S
3.
Remarks
N~
w/'?,....,~
/l'l
~d
,-
-*~l
~w/~
n e Marshal
eJ-//i/c; 3
Date
"'PC 04J3p/9459P
-]2-
-3"
I 7- 4 6
BOARD DF roueA TION
JOSE;::~ D CU!J.rJ,~.;GS. Pr..D
lA",;:;'y CUN~.:~~Gi-iA~/.
S....A=lO~~ GI~ES
PATR::;K A ~I'JJJ
GREG R S.e,';:X)'.J.L.~
SUPERINTEtlDENT
.K)>-lr; F V;)G~I~;, Pr._D
CHULA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOUL DIsmICT
84 E.-\ST "J" STREET' CH17L.... VISTA, CALIFOR!\IA 91910 . 6194259600
EACH CHILD IS A..'" IKDIVlDUAL OF GREAT WORTH
February 23, 1993
Ms. Maryann Miller
Environmental Review Coordinator
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
MI;R C'l
79Q>
'-',)
"
> ~.
RE IS-93-28/ F A-615/ DP-997
Location. 660 Bay Blvd.
Project. National University (In existing bldg.)
Dear Ms Miller
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the Notice of Initial
Study for the National University School project referenced above.
Since it appears no new construction is involved, no school fees are required.
Should this situation change, school fees for commercial development would
be due. The current fee of $27/square foot is distributed as follows: $.12 for
Chula Vista Elementary School District, $.15 for Sweetwater Union High
School District
Even though no fees appear to be necessary, the District is still required to
sign off on the Certificate of Compliance
~.2YL.. I
~atJ Shurson
Director of Planning & Facilities
KSdp
rr,..n fi.i~I1'f' \\11". ~ .n,-.;~'mf~e
-31
17~1?
..,.
f'iECEIVED
FEB 1 7 lYYj
PlANNING I>E;P"t.
ROUTING FORM
DATE: February 12, 1993
TO:
Ken larson, Building & Housing
John lippitt, Engineering (EIR only)
Cliff Swanson, Engineering (EIR only)
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering (EIR only)
Roger Daoust, Engineering (ISI3, EIR/2)
Richard Rudolf, Assistant City Attorney (EIR only)
Carol Gove, Fire Department
Marty Schmidt, Parks & Recreation
Keith Hawkins, Police Department
Current Planning
Frank Herrera, Advance Planning
Bob Sennett, City landscape Architect
Bob leiter, Planning Director
Chula Vista Elementary School District, Kate Shurson
~Sweetwater Union H.S. District, Tom Silva (IS & EIR)
Maureen Roeber, library (Final EIR)
Other
.i
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Ma ryann Mill er
Environmental Section
~ Application for Initial Study (IS- 93-28
c::J Checkprint Draft EIR (20 days)(EIR-
o Review of a Draft EIR (EIR-
c::J Review of Environmental Review Record
IFA- 615
IFB-
IFB-
FC-
lOP - 997 )
lOP )
lOP )
IERR- )
The project consJsts of:
This office building is existing and the project
proposes to use 8,000 sq. ft. for National University
of Classroom and associated office use. 150 expected
students wi~h 7 classrooms.
location:
660 Bay Boulevard
Please review the document and forward to me any comments you have by 2/19/93
.
COlm1ents:
See Mtached!!
"
17-4'8
_3~
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
Chula Vista Planning Department
itECEIVED
FfB 0 J '~;..l
PLAN
N/NG DEPr.
..
/1)/1
lr"/ I
, ,
DATE: February 2, 1993
TO:
x
X
X
X
X
Graphics
Fire Marshal
Building & Housing
Advance Planning
Engineering/Land Development Div.
X Landscape Architect
X Env. Review Coordinator
X Chula Vista School Dist.
X Sweetwater Union H.S.Dist.
X Ken Lee -'(.Notice only)
X Po 1 ice Dept.
FROM: Martin Miller
Planning Department
(Current Planning)
PCC- 93-26
P-
ZAV-
PCZ-
PCM-
PUD-
PCA-
GPA-
Conditional Use Permit
Project Name National University
Precise Plan
Variance
Location 660 Bav Blvd.
Zone Change
Miscellaneous
Request To establish an educational
facility in the "I" (Industrial)
Planned Unit Development
Zoning Text Amendment
General Plan Amendment
zone
Other
DepOsit Account Number DP. 994
Planning Commission Meeting Date March 24, 1993
Zoning Administrator Hearing Date February 12. 1993
Comments to be received by:
COMMENTS:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
P..y,.d~ t:7/'''/7~7 SPh,&TZo'KC~ ,4,U: %'!>..-,,)'7 "oi.lj.rp J He
/. " .,' /.'
/",*"Eal ~~5E~~.r/c 4'/.701 /~ -;?1e?,.I'1 ~~(;.:;P;?'7>, 1-/& /"~~ 7~:"
0..-' /7Z-0/'Ji',: '~7,~t? IF rk7cr /?71L7'"j, c,.",.;h-.<c/~~
:t' I"CtJ- f7!'ft- /77/"}' k /Z?",;".J.?r.Prr TI~/&.' CF &>4";0/":'-., r~lW. /
1~'-'~'cI _/~_ - 53 I 7 - 4- 7
APPLICATION CANNOT BE ACCEPTED UNLESS SITE PLAN
IS FOLDED TO FIT INTO AN 8-1/2 X 11 FOLDER
FOR OFn CE USE
INITlAL STUDY
Case No. T,- 5'-:';> ,_7%
Depos it :?C:c' - T.J/ 9>-'7
Receipt No. //9"/..::'
Date Rec'd ~-'-//- 92
Accepted by _' ~
Project No. ..cJ)/_/-:Y-
A. BACKGROUND
City of Chula Vista
Application form
1. PROJECT TITLE 660 Bay Boulevard
2. PROJECT lOCATION (Street address or description)
660 Bay Boulevard, Chula Vista, CA 91910
Assessors Book, Page &. Parcel No. 571-330-20-00
3. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTlON This office building is existinq ,!nd_the projec
proposes to use 8000 square feet for National University of classroorr
and associated office use. 150 expected students with 7 classrooms.
4. Name of Appl icant Foster Properties
Address 740 Bav Boulevard, Suite 200 Phone 427-1900
City Chula Vista State CA Zip 91910
5. Name of Preparer/Agent The Greenwald Company
Address 740 Bay Boulevard, Suite 200 Phone427-1900
City Chula Vista State CA Zip 91910
Relation to Applicant P~rtnprshiD
6. Indicate all permits or approvals and enclosures or documents
required by the Environmental Review Coordinator.
a. Permits or approvals required:
General Plan Amendment ___ Design Review Application ___
--- Rezone/Prezone ___ Tentative Subd. Map
___ Precise Plan ___ Grading Permit
--- Specific Plan ___ Tentative Parcel Map
-X- Condo Use Permit Site Plan &. Arch.Review
--- Variance Project Area Co~~ittee
-X- Coastal Development Use Permit
Permit
Public Project
Annexation
=== Redevelopment Agency
O.P.A. .
=== Redevelopment Agency
D.D.A.
L Other LCP
b. Enclosures or documents (as required by the Environmental Review
Coordinator).
___ Grading Plan
L Parcel Map
___ Precise Plan
___ Specific Plan
___ Other Agency Permit ~
or Approvals .Required ___
___ Arch. Elevations
___ Landscape Plans
___ Tentative Subd. Map
Improvement Plans
So i 1 s Report
Hazardous Waste
Assessment
___ Hydrological Study
___ Biological Study
___ Archaeological Survey
Noise Assessment
=== Traffic Impact Report
.~ Other
_,S_
17-jO
B. PROPOSED PROJECT
1.
a.
land Area: sq. footage 78,606
If land area to be dedicated, state
or acreage 1.73
acreage and purpose.
b. Does the project involve the construction of new buildings, or
will existing structures be utilized? exi,;ting c:t-r"r-t-"ro "t-ilized
2. Complete this section if project is residential.
a. Type development: Single family Two family
Multi family Townhouse Condominium
b. Total number of structures
c. Maximum height of structures
d. Number of Units: 1 bedroom 2 bedrooms
3 bedrooms
4 bedrooms
Total units
e. Gross density (OU/total acres)
f. Net density (OU/total acres minus any dedication)
g. Estimated project population
h. Estimated sale or rental price range
i. Square footage of structure
J. Percent of lot coverage by buildings or structures
k. Number of on-site parking spaces to be provided
1. Percent of site in road and paved surface
3. Complete this section if project is commercial or industrial or mixed
use.
a. Type(s) of land use Tnnnc:;.tr;;::ll ()f"fi,-.c P,,-il~-iT"\'.::
b. Floor area 34,452 Height of structure(s) ?R -foot-
e. Type of construction used in the structure rr-nr-r9t9
d. Describe major access points to the structures and the
orientation to adjoining properties and streets See attachea
Site Plan N~~ber (2) Two for earp,;,; ~nn ingroc:c:
e. Number of on-site parking spaces provided R~
f. Estimated number of employees per shift 28 , Number of
shifts one Total 28
g. Estimated number of customers (per day) and basis of estimate ___
1?9_students per day
h.
Estimated number of deliveries per day 5
-a.c:..
17--51
i. Estimated range of service area and basis of estimate
South Bay Region
j. Type/extent of operations not ;n enclosed buildings nla
k. Hours of operation 8:00 a.m to ]0:00 n.m ni'lily
1. Type of exterior lighting h;'iI'h !';nn;llm ]4 ff pnlp pytpr;nr
4. If project is other than residential, commerci a 1 or industrial
complete this section.
a. Type of project
b. Type of facilities provided
c. Square feet of enclosed structures
d. Height of structure(s) - maximum
e. Ultimate occupancy load of project
f. Number of on-site parking spaces to be provided
g. Square feet of road and paved surfaces
h. Additional project characteristics
C. PROJECT CH~R~CTERISTICS
I. If the project could result in the direct emission of any air
pollutants, (hydrocarbons, sulfur, dust, etc.) identify them."
NONE
2. Is any type of grading or excavation of the property anticipated No
(If yes, complete the following:)
a. Exc 1 ud i ng trenches to be backfi 11 ed, how many cubic yards of
earth will be excavated?
b. How many cubic yards of fill will be placed?
c. How much area (sq. ft. or acres) will be graded?
d. What will be the - Maximum depth of cut
Average depth of cut
Maximum depth of fill
Average depth of fill
- 3'-
17-:52
.
3. lIill there be any noise generated from the proposed project site or
from points of access which may impact the surrounding or adjacent
land uses? No
4.
Describe all energy consuming devices which are part of the proposed
project and the type of energy used (air conditioning, electrical
appliance, heating equipment, etc.) Existing HVAC package .units
5. Indicate the amount of natural open space that is part of the project
(sq. ft. or acres) approximately 200 square feet of garden
court yard.
6. If the project will result in any employment opportunities describe
the nature and type of these jobs. 16 faculty, 8 clerical., 4 ;anitorial
~ rnmpllt-PT
7.
Will highly
substances
site? NO
fl ammab 1 e
be used
or potent i ally
or stored
explosive
within
materials or
the project
8. How many estimated automobile trips, per day, will be generated by
the project? 432 automobile trips per day, 150 students X 2,
16 faculty X 2, and 50 general employees X 2.
9. Describe (if any) off-site improvements necessary to implement the
project, and their points of access or connection to the project
site. Improvements include but not limited to the following: new
streets; street widening; extension of gas, electric, and sewer
lines; cut and fill slopes; and pedestrian and bicycle facilities.
Nr")'rlp
D. DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
1. Geoloqy
Has a geology study been conducted on the property? No
(I f yes, please attach)
Has a Soils Report on the project site been made? vo". "0'" ~+ta~];)ed
(If yes, please attach)
2. Hydroloqy
Are any of the following features present on or adjacent to the
site? No (If yes, please explain in detail.)
a. Is there any surface evidence of a shallow ground water
table? subsurfacp WAtpr nh~pr'rp~ ~t- 1n fec+
b. Are there any watercourses or drainage improvements on or
adjacent to the site? No
-3?
/7- 53
L'Dr ()!..1~,.....lc'rcc
c. Does runoff from the project site drain directly into or toward
a domestic water supply, lake, reservoir or bay?
N(")
d. Could drainage from the site cause erosion or siltation to
adjacent areas? NO
e.
Describe
location.
all drainage facilities to be provided and their
existinq drainage facilities"
3. Noise
a. Are there any noise sources in the project vicinity which may
impact the project site? NO
4. BioloQY
a. Is the project site in a natural or partially natural state?
This is an existing project
b. If yes, has a biological survey been conducted on the property?
Yes
No _____ (Please attach a copy).
c. Describe all trees and vegetation on the site. Indicate
locat ion, height, diameter, and species of tree"s, and which (if
any) wi 11 be removed by the project. During construction, site
was completely graded and revegetated with lawn and trees
for parkina and access areas.
5. Past Use of the land
a.
Are there any known historical or
located on or near the project site?
archeological
NO
resources
b.
Are there any known paleontological resources?
NO
c. Have there been any hazardous materials disposed of or stored on
or near the project site? NO
d.
What was the land previously used for? ~~
Vacant Land
_3.cS
(7- 5 4
liFe 0413n/945QP
- ~-
6. Current Lo~d Use
a. Describe all structures and land uses currently existing on the
project site. Industrial office buildinq
b. Describe all structures and land uses currently existing on
adjacent property.
North
Office/Warehouse Building
South
Entrance to cnU.la v~Sl:.a l"'J.dLlud
East
Vacant Land and Hiqhwav 5
West
Warehouse Buildina
7. Social
a. Are there any residents on site? (If so, how many?) No
b. Are there any current employment opportunities on site? (If so,
how many and what type?) NO
8. Please provide any other information which may assist in the
evaluation of the proposed project.
~'pr n!Dc/Qlt;Oc
.L
-3i
I
i 7 - s5
E. CERTIFICATION
I.
or
Owner/owner in escrow*
HEREBY AFFIRM, that to the best of my belief, the statements and information
herein contained are in all respects true and correct and that all known
information concerning the project and its setting has been included in this
application for an Initial Study of possible environmental impact and any
enclosures for attachments thereto.
"DATE: ;;;2 - /0 - 93
*If acting for a corporatjon, include capacity and company name.
/ ) - jro
_ ~ t!:J
SITE PLAN CONTENTS
660 BAY BOULEVARD
1. 660 Bay Boulevard, Chula Vista, california 91910
2. Parcell of Parcel Map No. 13581 in the city of Chu1a Vista,
County of San Diego, State of California, as filed in the
office of the County Recorder of said San Diego County,
December 6, 1984 as File no. 84-455741 of Official Records.
3. 571-330-20-00
4. Foster properties, 740 Bay Boulevard, suite 200, Chu1a Vista,
california, 91910
5. The Greenwald Company, Agent, 740 Bay Boulevard, suite 200,
Chula Vista, California 91910
6. See site plan
7.
Existing building dimensions:
Concrete structure
Height 28 feet
8.
Existing adjacent structures:
630 Bay Boulevard
9. Industrial/Office Space
10. 34,452 square feet
11. See site plan
12. Existing chain link fence along west side of property 6 feet
in height.
13. See site plan
14. Existing landscaping to remain the same.
15. None
16 thru 21.
See site plan
-'II
17 -5 7
.
REPORT OF FIELD DENSITY TESTING
Trench Backfill. Suhgrade and Base Testing
Parcell. M"rina Gateway Project
Northwest of Bay Boulevard & "J" Street
Chula Vista, California
JOB NO. 87-4921
05 Fehruary 1988
-Y2.
Il-SY
~~~D
Q~~D
GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION, INC.
SOIL &. FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
GROUNDWATER. GEOPHYSICS. ENGINEERING GEOLOGY
.
05 Fehruary 1988
Mr. Mike McDonald
GREENWALD-McDONALD
2635 Camino del Rio South, #309
San Dieg'), CA 92108
Job No. 17-'1921
Suhject: Report of Field Density Testinq
Trench Backfill, Suhgrade and Base Testing
Parcell, Marina Gateway Project
North west Corner of Bay Boulevi'rd and" J" Street
Chula Vista, California
Dear Mr. McDon"ld:
In accordance with your request, Geotechnical Exploration, Inc., herehy
suhmits the following report summarizing our work and test results, as
well as our conclusions and recommendations concerning the suhject
project. A representative of our firm periodically visited the site and
tested the trench hack fill soils that were placed and comp"cted in
different areas at the suhject site, and also tested the finished subgrade
and base in the park ing areas of the site.
The field density testing was performed between Septemher 2, 1987, and
January 25, 1988.
SCOPE OF WORK
The scope of work 'of our services included:
1. Periodic field density testing of hackfill plAcement In storm drains,
utility trenches, sewer, and water lines. No continuous
observations were provided during the hack filling operation.
-"13
! -7 '::-01'
! -...J
74?n TP,oDF STRoq . SAN DIEGO. CALIFORNIA 92121 . (619) 549-7222
Marinn Gatewl'Y Project, Parcel 1
Chula Vista, CalifMnia
Joh No. 87-4921
Page 2
.
2. Performing field density tests in the placed and compacted suhgrade
and base material. No continuous C\hservations were provided
during preparation of the .suhgrade or hase for the i'rei'S to he
paved. Field density tests were performed on finish suhgrade or
base.
3. Performing lahoratory tests on representative samples of the fill
material to determine the laboratory maximum dry density of the fill
or hase material.
4. Providing professional conclusions and recommendntiC\ns reg~rding
the test results.
GENERAL SITE INFORMA TlON
The entire property, consisting of approximntely 4.3 acres, is located
west of Bay Boulevard, hetween "I" and "J" Streets, in the City of Chula
Vista. The property is horde red on the north hy a developed property,
on the south hy "J" Street, on the east hy Bay Boulevard, and on the
west by a railroad trnck belonging to San Diego and Arizona Eastern
Railroad.
Prior to this testing operation, the property had heen mass~raded under
our observations and testing, as described In our report dllted July 23,
1987 (Joh No. 87-4920. Herein we report the results ohtained in our field
density testing of trench hack fill and finish suhgrllde and hase mnterii'J of
park ing areas.
At the time of our last site visit on Jnnuary 25, 1988, the only soil-related
work pending Inside the property was the completion of p21ving of a
portion of the driveway separating the northern huilding and the southern
buildings.
-flf
/7- 60
~~~D
Marina Gateway Project, Parcel 1
r.hula Vista, California
Joh No. 87-4921
Page J
.
FIELD TESTING
Periodic field density tests were provided hy a representative of
Geotechnical Exploration, Inc. to check the grading contractor's
compliance with the applicahle drawings and joh specifications. The
periodic presence of our field representative at the site was to provide to
the contractor a continuing source of professional advice, opinions, and
recommendations t>ased upon the field representative's ohservations of
the contractor's work, and did not include any superintending,
supervision, or direction of the actual work of the contractor or the
contractor's workers. Our peri"dic visits were made on request of the
contractor's representative (Mr. Chuck Alt>right for Collins
Construction). Since our visits were periodical and we did not
continuously observe the grading procedures, we ,,"Iy report the field
density test results ohtained at the specific test locations.
The testing operation performed in the following general manner:
1. The soils encountered in the testing operation were from on-site and
imported sources, and consisted primarily of t>rown, silty sand with
clay; dark brown, sandy clay; tan, silty fine sand; hrowni silty,
fine to medium sand; light gray, fine to medium sand; brown, silty
sand with clay; red-brown, fine to medium sand; gray41rown,
medium to coarse sand with gravel; and gray-hrown, fine to coarse
sand with rock.
2. Fill materials were tested and found to he compacted to at least 90
percent of Maximum Dry Density. Areas with failing test results
were reworked and/or ..dditional compaction effort was provided
until acceptat>le results were ohtained. Soft or saturated spots on
the subgrade were indicated to the contractor for correction prior to
-IfS
'7 - 61
Q~~o
Marina Gateway P ~ct, Parcel 1
Chula Vista, Calik ..ill
Joh No. 87-4921
Page 4
hase placement. No ohservation WllS provided to verify that
corrections had heen made, since hase material WIlS already placed
at the time of our field technician's last site visit. The contractor
indicated that they w ill fix any damage occurring to pllvement within
the first year after placement.
Field density tests taken on base material indicllted compaction
degrees not lower than 95 percent relative compaction.
3. Field density tests were taken at the approximately locations shown
in the Plot PI"n (Figure No. I). and at the approximate depths
indicated in the list of test results (Figure No. II).
TESTS
Field density tests were performed in accordance with A.S. T .M. 0-1556.
MIlximum density determinations were performed in accordance with
A.S. T .M. 0-1557, Method A (and Method C for t'>ase milterial). The
reliltive compaction results, as summllrized on Figure No. II, are the
ratios of the field densities to the lahoratory Maximum Dry Densities,
expressed as percentages.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The following conclusions and recommendations are hased upon our
analysis of all the data availahle from the testing of the soils compacted on
this site.
General Testlnq
1. The soils utilized in the grading operation were from existing on-site
soils which were replaced and recompacted, and imported m"terillls
which were placed and recomp"cted. The soils primarily consisted
of t'>rown, silty sand with clay; dark hrown, sandy clay; hrown,
/7-t:(
-y,,- Q~~O
.
M~rina Gateway Pr'
Chula Vista, Califo
ct, Parcell
,a
Joh No. 87-q921
P~ge 5
silty sand with clay; tan, silty fine s~nd; brown, silty, fine to
medium sand; light gray, fine to medium sand; grl'y-brown, medium
to coarse sand with gravel; lInd gray-hrown, fine to COi'rse s~nd
with rock.
2.
During the testing operation, the hackfill soils were found to he
cnmpacted, at the specific test loclltions. to at least 90 percent
relative compaction. When failing test results were ohtained,
rework or additional compaction of the failing prea was recommended
until satisfactory results were ohtained. Field density tests were
also taken in the suhgrade and hase material after the soil or hase
material had been placed and compacted. Density test results nn
suhgrade or hase material at the specific test location indicated
compaction degrees no lower than 95 percent relative compaction.
Areas of soft or saturated soils ohserved in the suhgrade were
pointed out to the contr~ctor fnr correction prior to h~se placement.
No verification of corrections could !>e made hy our field technician
since h~se material was ~Iready placed at the time of his following
visit to the site.
No continuous ohservations of the compaction procedure were
provided by the representative of our firm during comp~ction of
trench hackfill or subgrade and hase preparation. Only field
density and laboratory test results are presented herein.
3. All recommendations presented In our previous reports for this site
remain applicahle unless superseded In writing.
SUMMARY
Based on our experience, It is our opinion that the testing operation
described herein, in general, was performed in conformance with the
currently accepted standard of practice In the field of geotechnical
engineering. It is to he understood that our test results and opinion of
-f"? '
! /-
G~~o
. "7
J.... ~-..
.\.....-''__,J
Marina Gateway Project, Parcell
Chula Vist", California
I
Joh No. 87-11921
Page 6
the field density testing general acceptance ~o not guarantee that every
cuhic y"rd of compacted fill has neen compacted to specific"tion since not
every cubic yard has t-een ohserved or tested. Our test results Indicate
the measured compaction degree ohtained "t the specific test location. We
can only guarantee that our tests have heen made in accordance with the
care and current profession,,! stand"rds in our field.
The testing described herein w"s performed hetween Septemher 2, 1987,
and January 25, 19BB.
All statements in the report are applicah/e only for the testing oper"tion
performed by our firm. The firm of Geotechnical Exploration, Inc. shall
not be held responsible for fill soils pl"ced without our observations and
testing at any other time, or subsequent changes to the site hy others,
which directly or indirectly c"use poor surface or suhsurface drainage,
water erosion. and/or alteration of the strength of the compacted fill
soils.
In the event that any changes in the nature, design, or location. of the
buildings or improvements are planned, the conclusions and recommen-
dations contained in this report shall not he considered valid unless the
changes are reviewed and conclusions of this report modified or verified
In writing.
Professional opinions presented herein have !'leen made h"sed on our tests
and experience, and they have !'leen made In accordance with generally
accepted current geotechnical engineering principles and practices. This
warranty is in lieu of all other warranties, either expressed or implied.
-~5
17- 61
~UUG~D
Marina Gateway Project, Parcell
Chula Vista, California
Joh No. 87-4921
Page 7
.
Thank you for this opportunity to he of service. Should any Questions
arise concerning this report, please do not hes Itate to contact us.
Reference to our Jot> No. 17-11921 will help to expedite a reply to your
inquiries.
Respectfully suhmitted,
GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION, INC.
Enclosures
~M~
Jaime A. Cerros
Project Engineer/R.C.E. 34422
JAC/pj/170
cc: Addressee (4)
Collins General Contractors (2)
-'1''f
(/es
QUCA~o
Compaction Test Results
. Depth Moisture Field Soil Relative
Test Date Location Fill OlO Density Type Compaction
SEIlER TRENCH TESTS
SI 7/2/87 8uilding A -0.5' 9.4 114 pet I 92%
S2 7/2/87 Building A -1.0 ' 12.4 115 pet I . 93%
S3 712187 Bldg. A auxi1lary -2.0' B.7 112 pet I 90%
S4 11110/87 Building B 2.0' 8.2 129 pet VI 96%
S5 11110/87 Buil di n9 8 3.0' 11.7 122 pet VI 92%
S6 11111/87 Building 8 -2.0' 17 .6 105 pet V 91%
S7 11111/87 8uilding 8 -2.0' 21.2 115 pet II 93%
S8 11112/87 8ui1ding 8 F.G. 15.6 III pc t II 89%
Sg 11/12/87 8uilding 8 F.G. !7 .6 114 pet II 92%
SIO 11112/87 8uildin9 8 F.G. 15.6 114 pet II 92%
STORM DRAIN TRENCH TESTS
SOl 10/27/87 410+80 8ay
Blvd. crossing 4.0' 7.0 III pet V 97%
S02 10/29/87 Parallel to J SI. 1.0 ' 4.5 104 pet V 95%
S03 10129/87 Parallel to J SI. 2.0' 14.5 121 pet II 97%
S04 10/29187 Parallel to J SI. 4.0' 15.2 120 pet II 97%
S05 11/4187 410+80 Bay
Blvd. crossing 2.0' 7.0 124 pet VI 93%
S06 11/4/87 410+80 Bay
Blvd. crossing 4.0' B.9 131 pet VI 98%
S07 11112/87 410+80 Bay
Blvd. crossing 2.0' 10.0 117 pet IV 93%
S08 11/16/87 410+80.Bay
Blvd. crossing F.G. 9.9 . 116 pet VII 96%
SOg 11/16/87 Bay Blvd.
box a rea 6.0'/FG 9.3 113 pet II 91%
CONTINUED
auc~o
_S4i
Job No. 87-4921 17-b0
Figure No. IIa
~
Compaction Test Results
Depth Moisture Field Soil Relative
Test Date Location Fill 0.'0 Density Type Compaction
!lATER TRENCH TESTS
WI 10/27/87 SW side of
parking area 2.5' 7.0 111 pef I . 891 FAIL
W2 10/27/87 SW side of
parking area 2.5' 13.0 114 pef II 921
W3 10/27/87 N side of
parking area 2.5' 13.1 112 pef II 901
W4 10/27/87 N side of
parking area 2.5' 12.7 119 pef II 961
WS 10/27/87 retest WI 2.5' 8.0 116 pcf I 94%
JOINT TRENCH TESTS
Jl 11/23(87 Parking between
81 dg s A & B 2.5' 8.5 112 pef III 901
J2 11(23/87 Parking between
Bldgs A & B 2.5' 10.0 114 pef III 921
J3 11(23/87 Parking between
81d9SA&B 2.5' 10.5 113 pef III 911
J4 11/23(87 Parking west of
Bl dg. A 2.5' 11.5 117 pef 111 941
J5 11/23/87 Pa rk i ng between
Bldgs A & B 5.0' 10.9 113 pef 111 911
J6 11/23/87 Parking west of
Bldg. A 5.0' 8.3 113 pef 111 911
J7 11/23/87 Parking west of
Bldg. A 3.0' 10.5 115 pef III 931
J8 11/23/87 Parking west of --
Bldg. A 3.0' 10.5 113 pef III 911
J9 11/23/87 E. of Bldg. A 2.0' 9.0 112 pef 111 901
JIO 11/23/B7 E. of Bldg. A 2.0' 10.0 112 pef III 901
J11 11/23/87 E. of Bldg. A 2.0' 11.0 113 pef III 911
CONTINUEO
.
CUD;J~0=
_sl
Job No. 87-4921
Fi9ure No. lib
/7-{:
7
/
:
Compaction Test Results
. Depth Moisture Field Soil Relative
Test Date Location Fill % Density Type Compaction
SUBGRAOE AIID BASE TESTS
Bl 1/12/B8. see plot plan 5.G. 13.6 123 pet III 99%
B2 1/12/88 see plot plan 5.G. 14.2 120 pet III 97%
B3 1/12/88 see plot plan 5.G. 9.4 113 pet V 98%
B4 1/14/88 see plot plan Base 6.4 141 pet VIII 97%
B5 1/14/88 see pI at plan Base 5.7 142 pet VIII 98%
B6 1/14/88 see plot plan Base 6.2 143 pet VIII 99%
B7 1/14/88 see plot plan Base 5.5 140 pet VII I 96%
B8 1/14/88 . see plot plan Base 6.7 141 pet VIII 97%
B9 1/21/88 see plot plan 5.G. 15.6 121 pef III 98%
Bl0 1/21/8B see plot plan 5.G. 16.3 120 pef II 97%
B11 1/21/88 see plot plan 5.G. 8.1 119 pef III 96%
B12 1/21/88 see plot plan 5.G. 11.1 121 pef III 96%
B13 1/22/88 see plot plan 5.G. .11.1 120 pef I 97%
B14 1/22/88 see plot plan 5.G. 11.1 119 pef III 96%
B15 1/22/88 see plot plan 5.G. 12.5 121 pef III 97%
B16 1/22/88 see plot plan 5.G. 11.1 122 pef III 98%
B17 1/22/88 see plot plan 5.G. 17.6 121 pef I 98%
B18 1/22/88 see plot plan 5.G. R3 123 pef III 99%
B19 1/22/88 see plot plan 5.G. 11.1 110 pef V 96%
B20 1/22/88 see plot plan 5.G. 8.1 122 pef III 98%
B21 1/25/88 see plot plan Base 5.3 130 pef IX 97%
B22 1/25/B8 see plot plan Base 12.3 129 pef IX 96%
B23 1/25/88 see plot plan Base 9.9 133 pef IX 99%
1/25/88 see plot plan B.l 128 pet IX 96% -
B24 Base
B25 1/25/88 see plot plan Base 6.0 130 pef IX 97%
B26 1/25/88 see plot plan Base 5.3 132 pef IX 99%
B27 1/25/88 see plot plan Base B.l 133 pef IX 99%
B28 1/25/88 see plot plan Base 6.4 131 pet IX 98%
B29 1/25/88 see plot plan Base 12.3 133 pef IX 99%
B30 1/25/88 see plot plan Base 9.9 130 pet IX 97%
IlIrn
~e ^~D
~UJ<5"'GJ
-.s~
Job No. 87-4921
Fi9ure No. lie
17 -6B
Compaction Test Results
Depth Moisture Field Soil Relative
Test Dale Location Fill 0.'0 Density Type Compaction
B31 1/25/88 see plot plan Base 8.1 132 pcf IX 9B%
B32 1/25/88 see plot plan Base 5.3 130 pet IX 97%
B33 1/25/88 see plot plan Base 11.1 128 pef IX -95%
834 1/25/88 see plot plan Base 9.3 129 pef IX 96%
B35 1/25/88 see plot plan Base 9.3 127 pef IX 95%
TYPE
SOIL CLASSIFlCATIOft
DESCRIPTION OPTIMUM MOISTURE
MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY
Brown, silty sand with sone clay. 9.5%
124 pef
II
Dark brown, sandy clay. 12.a
124 pef
III
Red-brown, fine to medium sand. 10.5%
124 pef
IV
8rown, sli9htly silty sand. 10.6%
126 pcf
V
Tan, silty fine sand. 7.7%
lIS pef
VI
Brown, silty, fine to coarse sand. 9.2~
134 pef
VII
light gray, fine to Ill€dium sand. 11.0%
121 pef
VIII
Gray-brown, medium to coarse sand with rock. 8.7%
145 pef
IX
Gray-brown, fine to coarse sand with rock. 11.1%
134 pef
~fr.=J1~D
~UL.J""l5uJ
- $3
Job No. 87-4921
Figure No. lId
/ 7c~!
R
I
r--...
---
LEGEND
",.
.
.
SCALI ,'.50'
~ paOpOflO ".UCTURI
In "'OY'. ......" ..U.....
=:L. fill 'LO".
-- .<
,
I
--, -,
f) ( l
I ~,
\J '--
---
~_C
"------- 80 _10--01l101"AL "'U.G'UIlIHG 'O.OG,-.
I .,.- ,~...l.J/...~" --- '.f. "NIIH 'LOOlt ILIV"TION
.(, 'I/O .
11+1- WATI" ''''NCH TIll
II WI" , "I He::" "1'
-'~~'"
"\~
,
\ EJ
.-./ "-)
\ ~
I '---
?
/(
'-I
$-I ~ $-5
B
r-
,-, I
---/
)
I
/
)
/
"fu
/j
r'- ,. c:
\~,,)
BLDG
.
.
,.J''vJ
J
~
\.
,..,
I
BAY
. "IOINT UTlllTUI TlUNCH TISI
.1..1
EJ 01"'" O' filL Hit"
-,
I
:
/
"0... ORA'N TIIIHCH Till
\.--
~
14\
I
.."
So, .1.."
,,'
'-.
I
I
1)'-'
1\
\"-~
I
/----./
/
$.10
I
I
I
\
f\,.... ~~
,J ......
..
?
"
JI-'
.J
r-
-~
-.J
SAN DIEGO AND ARIZONA EASTERN RAII,ROAD
.'
~
I
, !
i." ..
~ I 11:-
~illhml
'!jlH;, ill
~Iilliml
~l !~1!:1!;:1
'I f~l'l'!t
. Hltl"l~~l
'"'ll!.ll'''
Ul>~ _I< H<
. '" .......,.
'I~~'~!\"'''''~k-&-.::-' ,;. ~
. J'~'~jpl':_;.[" _~.
Lf~"1i-<$';' I
'-"~"'!'<""" .
. ,~ lit~Ai~;.t,- ~~ :
'. d,.......I",.~\\..I' I
\ .' '\'r-'~,"J
~..~-:~':;, :
__~,',' ~ \\,.1 j
"""'~I"C 'I C
.e:~ ....,-.1[1
'1- -'r '.-- I' 'm'
'~~~'::h ~..( <.
. ~"~'9:)-:t~I~lili
'.;-.rr.:....... ~(.- Ii
~;,{:....."'tt-:'~;;o-.. .,..._)
~.lo."'~b!L....~ I
\
l.R,.,...q~
L~"""'~
1.#.'1(.... 9
-
f"''' t"f'" 'I lr. I'~
,~~i: ;!;~t! ,Ji: lEi iil
I bi! l~~:;;. i~i ;1~1 Iii
"'j. ]1;\,""1<1(' I.,
I : II;' . ,,'! I ::. !:: i ~Ij
lill l.,'i,l,,!,.,\,.-Il
li::,'1 !;(:ll~: Iii,' I'~l,
r, ',' .1. ,.... ,
. 1'\'1 'pl'h ., j'lll 'II
", i,!II"..;' lJd I
II" r 1 I\' I ~ i I II! I." iI 11.1
;ljl:.')li"'!:ljhk
I" ,\ ',I" ii-I.,": j'!
"1.1 'l'I'.'I"lld II
ll'lll:j.J";J.I'JI'1
lilll: _ili,1 jlr:..;I.: I'
Id:" II III .{.....,hl .1
n
. I
It'
I
.- ....1
-.-.--......
_..,_.._,UR'
.. ~,. I ~C' ""UW"ll ..,,~,._-
IJ,.O"1~".u;-
I ~L~J
.
.
. <.
1 '
$ ~ ~-
~ ~ ~!
. ~ ~~
1 "
>q
CI l~ J
" l'i
:::' ~(
a: ,.~
C) f..
CI 11 i
z .,
-"
It. (
CI ,
x:
.
I
g 1'1 j
~
~I
~ I
I.LJ ~
=1 ~
to .
i
11~lu 1
J',!i /'0 f
J,.-:!..I1 t4l't
"1,',/' I.
OJ Jg,_
ee,', r; it
i5:;>-' !t~ ~
i!;~ l'~ !i'
~2~ 1~ .;~
~il(> ; l~i
(~~"t t-~~ J1
~~)-~ if~ 'j
~~~ .tsi ~
t u~, II. !Ill
l!.~ Jt-
..lcd, tti~ "
,
i,
,'i! .
.,
I \ Ii
'1:"
, .
,
---- ..~
_.. -... I
,
, I
..
I';
,
I
_. .:1
I I ~m /l-//
. Ii .. .
Iii d . I
..: III I' f
1",'1, I" I
..1;1 I,
1"" I I
IL i~j II ~
'. t!I.1 I.
..1, Hi! I: II
II:! 11"1 1 I
-. .1. I
~ ~H: /I~ ~ ~ ; ~
,:'
Ii, II': f'" i:',
I; ;,'1; I :;i
I j1 r l_i 1,1 I ;11
,1 ',1' 1 t'J I "J
!i I' i!l. ;, H;~! f: II I
Ii tS i';-;. ; Illl !:! 11 ,
Ii 'II ,;I. ,: ! :1'; , !~ ill
it j 1i;1:1 liD; ! Ii !~ t
I'l!'sl.-'!l ''1'1 i'l'
.1 :.: ,i!: -, , i,d i I' 'I 1
]; J A:: 11>: II I n.... .;,.
j: i ~. .... - .
/IP-------
(
-
I
U_#"-9 '
n .
~~~I ,"
,..., 1":-
"
. I.
,
, ,
. >
~
.~:,
:I;
~t
101
-~
, 111/11111111
~
f' ,Ii ~D3jjfrnvRail~" ~~
f
!
I
i
,
,
, '
)
r
.
r - . . ,n
~ .:"J. .;;;~ ~ ~~ ~~. f \[
... ~~.... ...,.,~.A /J .J
g. 'Ll!1'~' OJ, ~i:ijtn ~
l' ". r . I, ",_y>'I,.
"'. . ",...- ~:E;::.l...... .
i I' 'r; '. ,.,... "",. ! D)
n I~~"', '~-;I; .....= u
~:"; i: ,-rl" r ", ::11i; ~
. J. .'"' ft:
' . -, ,.... '... Ii :>
'~ ;" ; - '/ IJ
~!!:~,;:jII";"'Il:.:':!;. J
I!iL!0 '! ,.} ~
'i;'_' _"..:,c. , ;'::,~c'~:',' ;;:
'lj'l' " :-,;.'t,~~"/ t I!.
!". ~~".. r
.:i' ) - '..
. l ~ "j; I ..1_, .
:~ f';:" P: I :
..- ,; I : ~!~ .: I. . '(
- '/' id~~; ~'''I' : CI
. .. ~"~;....: t r
:': f~', ri ":: ,:'
n .!{,\i !i'1 : I
! c: ) 1 ~
:;~~
......;,_........_.'1 j ~I
~::;:~;';:;/:-~ -41
::::':(,::':'::::-::vr'j 1\.../
...._....;....._--:..~ t J
! ;
,
.
I
~ ,~
; l '! ,~ ~ ,",
. " 01: '. ~
/ I ! i i! ;:
:"1' : :_!~ :".
r !:lti
-"~~;,U ,',':~I
!~
,
,
.
eo 1, J
Ii \, ! i
1.3 ) ~ ,.
\: 4 ~ ~ ~ ..
I'" I.' 1 ~ t.~ ~
.~ -~:t t-' if! f~ .~
I: j .... ~..
'."1. J. 1h ~: _
1,-.. I"~ II /.
'->.JjZf-. \ ~ '
. 'Dot ~-"Ii~...._
>:" ,I, i;i ij~l,~!
hi ~ I L' ~
--..... -4l-.
"
~
1
"
.
z
.
"
I
.
t
X
I
,
~
,
\
.
.
!
.
C
..'1.1'" --
l,j......"Il;;i...''''''1M!
--..,..,.
-D,l-ill ffi
. ~l U
- ,': .~ -; . ~
" ~ j s: iJ'"~.
~~,'-..~ 1!~; L
._ ....;10 . I ~~ 1
.' "t, Il
.~ '1
fT l
I I "
J d ~
If) ~
~J~~
.g ~ F
-+ !~
- ~
................
----......
-..-.......-
; ..
"'l".-.c.o
...,~ .
''W"l', 10' "AU'" ""..~..
. : I
.
;
Jj
."
VI
t;
t
. "1
.. ~J ~!
Z. (..
.!
~l.
;:' i! .
'1-' 'j'
h.d /f~
1.'
.'
\'
~t-,
1
'.
"!
.. ~ i 1 '1>i
.;. ;.~.-.
.".'
,
~
:'1 I
~~.I .;
HI!
; ~. t. I :'".
~ ; ~f~
~ ~~
'<4- .;'
.. :....>-'.
-,---'
J.;.
-"I
J
(
I
,
..
. 1
. ~ if i
~ \ ~.'''' .. ;
.. :u 'I h f I
1 ! i~~ ~ \1 ~
.. . t: i I ;~ i -
, ,. ..1
- ~ - ",
.-).. ~...:....~r1
:: 1- '~I ! I =-=d
, nd~
. - -. ....lI)--~ ~ ~rl
#....~~!'",1...
.~ ;
C:' ~.;: I'
~ : 1:-:--: .
k:r;-~j ,
I
-s&:>
.
"
.:; ~ " E
.~-."':;
',. ...~'
.. .
"
" 1 : .
" I-
) ej ,
f~t )
iij ~
s
v
!
~:;
z;
j:
~
.'
~
.
1
,
i
.
.
" I"' I'
111' ;,; I
I" I!!' I;
'i : IiI! I J
i" ";,, " '
'I : "" I, I
I', ii!:, j.
.: ; :-:1 ~ J OJ i
" "If'" II
',I! Ilj;j'J ,. t
iil i ~'i! I :: l
II!! 1,111 J 11 i!)
!. .0 "".. Ii!
~ i
iI j III
i., ~I
ii Iii!
11 if:il
~l ii ji;
J: 11 1 ~ j
hlIlE;
!!. i I' PI
[:1J jJj
. !.Il
i'I'!! I
"'li ~ j I
'.'
i/!iJi
!jl
~ : ~ I
L., _
'!I:
~! :
!!l!j
"j'.
Ih t;
II!,!
h. .
ii1:1,
,
"
lll'i""
. Idj
i I!!;I
I- , njij t
jlil il1!f~ 5
, 111 !,lj, r
~ l !lj;J:i ~
'H,!':lIi'ii
",,- ".:
ii I'! J'- I~" I ;,' Ii j
.. It., I,ll i'J 1f11:1 t.
11 I.! I !I!, IIi! :,:!11 'j' Ii
I u. . I I I "1 "'I ' ,
1 !,l: 1t',11-11 iI,; Ii. I
H .il.. !:,~ 1, 'j I'! J., . T f
",' ", '1'1"" i.;" ii', 11'1
~ I;~ ',i 1 4i i ,",' ~;' ..pi Iii " :,
Ii tl'l J 1'1: III 111 ,. .'
I' )1., ;1. ih!I:' I; ",i n; j"ll
," .,III"il!", 11"'1,' ,I I
I-I I .,' I' rl', . I
~ ~ :1!:li ! ::c ! !, ;1 : !'i: !il : !. ~ !
1~ .
i. ~,!!I: ! I I ! I I !'
i1 .."'" :, ! 'I' ! I,I! 1'1 I
':. 'I" I 'II;: j
I I' I II I I'''''' {,
g5jJ!IJh!.','r"III ;'!:/,II! :."
~
$
~
>
~
!
t
17 - 7;;.
.
~
, I 1 I I 1'1' , I r
,
:.If
fi.
.
I
I
.
\
\
I
-1- .-
-I
j
-1--,-
i
c:J ~ I ',:; L HCH & NSOCl^TESI
.:, ' I,. It"; ""I~~I"IA!"..A......!""..uC'l1I'I(1\AI'lo<.t"lII."""'1
...~_ ~ ~!__.c,~~._"'_" .......o.r,.., """'I~J""'.""II1~
...,
o
'0
"--0
Cl
::0
~
'0
:J:
><
3:
::>
'0
/ /- '/ <:
. ~
Ii
t i i ~ t
II" '
.
;
J~
, \-
~
;
';'.
~
:. \
\
~
...-- ~"- . - .
. .
DETAIL A
SCALE 1"=200'
.1'l
63
@
~
~
~
030
""
).~ \
,'" 0
~~ r
01:1.....- -
':'~~ ..J'l
~-....... 0 51.3.
'" 0 ? 4S9.1S
-,.;. 1,'18",.1
QSEC 170
.568.8B
..y. 3./7".3~'-"';
~
~
L
y.!'
EC
171
A.
y.!'
~
48
SHT.4
':;.
~
L
~
A.
y.!'
.
'"
~
.
:.
. 'It. ..0
, ".
r''''
~~
'\ ;
" ~
DETAIL 'B"
SCALE 1';400'
35
.~~.
..s''''
J.j. ,3
,.,..
r..J,.IZ
, RoJ,,4
~o
,~
, ",
.~ "
"~'.
", ...,
J()J5J. . ....i
",t.~'3~;.t ~..~.\:.
Cit, ~~.
~ .~~.
~ "'.
~~~~."''' /7 - 74
tl~tal.
t~-&.
....,
~:....,~.'t
....)-~
~
~
...
y.!'
~
....
't
MAP 1198 - BAY VILLA reT RESUB
MAP lE6 (M 505) - Rp~CHO DE LA NAC
-5 S' POR OSEC 163.1Gl
MM 341.375.399 ROS 882.9JL4585
,
~
'r
RESOLUTION NO. PCC-93-26
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL
GRANT A CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TO ALLOW A
CONTINUING EDUCATION/UNIVERSITY FACILITY AT 660
BAY BOULEVARD IN THE I (GENERAL INDUSTRIAL)
ZONING DISTRICT
WHEREAS, a duly verified application for a conditional use permit was filed with
the City of Chula Vista Planning Department on January 28, 1993 by Foster
Properties, a General Partnership ("Applicant") in connection with a proposed lease
to National University; and,
WHEREAS, said application requests approval of a conditional use permit (PCC-
93-26) to allow a continuing education/university facility for 150 students and 10
staff per day of operation in an existing structure in the I (General Industrial) zoning
district ("Project") at 660 Bay Boulevard ("Project Site") (Attachment "A" in the Staff
Report); and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Director set the time and place for a hearing on said
conditional use permit application and notice of said hearing, together with its
purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city
and its mailing to property owners within 1,000 feet of the exterior boundaries of the
property at least 10 days prior to the hearing; and,
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely
Wednesday, April 28, 1993 at 7:30 p.m. in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth
Avenue, before the Planning Commission and said hearing was thereafter closed; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission must determine that subject use meets
the parking requirements; and
WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator concluded that there would
be no significant environmental effects and recommends that the Negative Declaration
issued on IS-93-28 be adopted.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission hereby
finds that the project will have no significant environmental impacts and adopts the
Negative Declaration issued on IS-93-28.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, pursuant to Section 19.54.050, the Planning
Commission finds that the Project requires 85 off-street parking spaces and, as
proposed, has adequate off-street parking for 150 students and 10 staff per day of
operation.
/ / /)
-51
Resolution No. PCC-93-26
April 28, 1993
Page #2
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission hereby recommends
that the City Council adopt the attached Draft City Council Resolution which adopts
the Negative Declaration issued on IS-93-28, and grant the conditional use permit to
Applicant in connection with National University, based on the Findings and subject
to the Conditions contained therein, and subject to the adoption of the required
Coastal Development Permit to allow subject use in the I (General Industrial) Zone as
a conditional use.
That a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the applicant and the City
Council.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA,
CALIFORNIA, this day 28th day of April, 1993 by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES:
Vice Chair Martin, Carson, Tarantino, Tuchscher
NOES:
Commissioner Ray
ABSENT:
Chair Fuller, Commissioner Moot
ABSTENTIONS:
None
()
,
Thomas A. Martin, Vice Chair
U~l Q~~
Nancy R ley, S creta
:IHOMElPLANNINGIMARTININA TlJNI19326PC.RES
/7 -7G
-~o
Excerpt from Draft Minutes
of Planning Commission Meeting of 4/28/93
ITEM 5:
PUBLIC HEARING; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PCC-93-26; REQUEST
TO ESTABLISH AN EDUCATIONAL FACILITY AT 660 BAY BOULEVARD
(NATIONAL UNIVERSITY) - Foster Properties
Associate Planner Miller presented the staff report. Staff recommended that the Planning
Commission find that the project would have no significant environmental impacts, and adopt
the Negative Declaration issued on IS-93-28. It was also recommended that the Planning
Commission adopt Resolution No. PCC-93-26 recommending that the City Council approve
Condition Use Permit No. 93-26, subject to the conditions contained in the draft City Council
resolution, based on the findings contained therein and subject to the adoption of the required
Coastal Development Permit to allow the subject use in the General Industrial zone as a
conditional use.
Commissioner Ray was concerned with the adequacy of the parking and the traffic flow coming
into the southern end. Parking in the driveway on the curve creates a problem. He suggested
use of the areas to the east, at some future point, if the parking becomes constrained. Mr.
Miller noted that this was not part of the application and had not been analyzed. However, a
condition could be included that all curbing at the southern and northern entrances be painted
red, marked for no parking, and signs be posted.
Associate Planner Miller stated, also, that the main impact of the University would be in the
evening when the other users had vacated the premises for the day. There would not be the
conflict between the uses in parking.
Commissioner Ray stated he would include a cap as far as enrollment level. Mr. Miller
answered that this conditional use permit would be approved for 150 students maximum. If
National University anticipated growing beyond that, they would have to come back and modify
the conditioml use permit. At that point in time, parking across the street would be considered
and/or a reciprocal parking agreement for the parking on the remainder of the site.
Environmental aspects would have to be taken into consideration at that time.
Commissioner Tuchscher questioned the number of parking spaces per student noting this
application called for 1-1/2 parking spaces per two students which was above the 2: 1 ratio. Mr.
Miller stated staff required a minimum of 85 parking spaces.
Discussion ensued regarding different college campuses and the parking ratios used.
This being the time and the place as advertised, the public hearing was opened.
Charla Rios, 6507 West Sierra Street, Glendale, AZ, Project Manager for Foster Properties,
felt National University would benefit the South Bay and attract other lessees to the area.
Regarding parking, they were willing to have a reciprocal agreement with 630 Bay Blvd. since
-r;!-
//-//
they owned the other building. There was no one in the parking lot at night, and it would also
help with security in that area. There were 221 parking spaces between the two building. She
felt there was plenty of parking to satisfy even future growth of National University. Ms. Rios
asked for Commission approval.
Commissioner Carson asked how soon National would be starting business. Ms. Rios noted it
would be immediately; the space plans and designs were ready to be permitted, with building
to start. Foster Properties would like to have them occupy the building no later than June 15.
Amendments had been given to the Coastal Commission.
M. C. Cook, 4025 Camino Del Rio S., San Diego, representing National University, stated
that they had been looking for over a year to locate a place in Chula Vista. He felt this facility
would lend itself very well to educational use. The average student was 33 years old and very
mature, would attend class from 5:30 to 10 p.m. in the evenings and on Saturdays. He asked
for Commission support.
Commissioner Tarantino felt it would be a welcome addition.
Answering Commissioner Carson, Mr. Cook stated that National University was fully accredited
by the Western Association of Schools and Colleges, the same regional association that
accredited San Diego State.
No one else wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Ray asked if there was a bus stop in front of 630 or 660 Bay Blvd. At Associate
Planner Miller's request, Ms. Rios (the applicant) said she had been talking with Chula Vista
Transit to try to get buses down in that area. It would also help to bring other tenants into the
area. Transit would be proposing to the City Council to bring bus systems on a regular basis
approximately 10 times a day to the corner of "J" Street and Bay Boulevard to start July I.
Associate Planner Miller stated that as a condition of approval, the applicant was also required
to install 8 bicycle parking'stalls.
MSUC (Carson/Tuchscher) 5-0 (Fuller and Moot excused) that the project would have no
environmental impacts and adopt the Negative Declaration on IS-93-28.
MS (Carson/Ray) to adopt Resolution No. PCC-93-26 recommending that City Council
approve Conditional Use Permit 93-26, subject to the conditions contained in the draft City
Council resolution, based on the findings contained therein and subject to the adoption of
the required Coastal Development Permit to allow subject use in the General Industrial
Zone as a conditional use, and to add a condition that curbs at both entrances be painted
red and signs posted.
Commissioner Ray felt the facilities would grow rapidly, and asked if it would be feasible as
part of the conditional use permit to have a Zoning Administrator review or Traffic Engineer
I 7 - 18
_~;L-
review at six months or a year to make a determination as to whether the parking had remained
adequate.
Assistant Planning Director Lee said it could be added, but the College was limited to 150, and
if they proposed an expansion, the parking would have been considered.
Commissioner Ray was concerned with the parking ratio, believing most of the vehicles would
be single-occupied and the number of spaces would be inadequate. Assistant Attorney Rudolf
advised that the parking issue was treated as a separate issue from the conditional use permit.
Under the ordinances, because there was no comparable use in Chapter 19.62, the Commission
establishes the proper parking. If the Commission made a finding based on staff's
recommendation that the 85 spaces were an appropriate requirement for that, that in effect
becomes an ordinance requirement for parking and not an issue as a condition of the conditional
use permit. Mr. Rudolf said the Commission was capable of changing the number of spaces,
as long as there is some reasonable basis of saying that something more than 85 was appropriate.
Commissioner Tarantino was under the impression that all 150 students would not be utilizing
the plant on the same two days. The applicant clarified there would be up to 150 students per
night, with no more than 300 students enrolled.
Discussion continued regarding the parking ratio, and the ratio used at other schools. Assistant
Planning Director Lee noted that the permit would be subject to any and all new, modified, or
deleted conditions imposed after approval of the permit. If there is a parking problem, staff
would meet with the applicant to come up with a solution. If not, the problem would be back
before the Commission for them to address.
Answering Commissioner Ray, Mr. Lee said the vehicle to signal a parking problem would be
by complaints. Staff could monitor the situation and report back in three or six months.
Commissioner Tuchscher noted the applicant had in excess of the 85 parking spaces required,
in addition to reciprocal parking, along with street parking. He was comfortable with the
parking situation.
At Mr. Miller's suggestion, Commissioner Tuchscher felt it was premature to enter into a
reciprocal agreement at this time. He recommended that the project as recommended by staff
be approved.
Assistant City Attorney Rudolf clarified that there would be no more than 150 students and 10
staff per day of operation. It should be made clear when granting the conditional use permit.
He suggested that No. I in the resolution be changed to read "improve the project site with the
project for a maximum of 150 students and 10 staff on any day of operation by the educational
facility." He asked if that was acceptable to the applicant. The applicant concurred.
Commissioner Carson asked if that included Saturday. Mr. Rudolf answered affirmatively.
Commissioner Carson amended her motion to read as follows. The second agreed.
- &3-
/ ? - 77
AMENDED MOTION:
To adopt Resolution No. PCC-93-26 reconunending that City Council approve Conditional
Use Permit 93-26, subject to the conditions contained in the draft City Council resolution,
based on the findings contained therein and subject to the adoption of the required Coastal
Development Permit to allow subject use in the General Industrial Zone as a conditional
use, and to add a condition that curbs at both entrances be painted red and signs posted,
and amending condition no. 1 in the resolution to read "improve the project site with the
project for a maximum of 150 students and 10 staff on any day of operation by the educational
facility. "
Commissioner Ray reminded the Commission that they were setting a precedent for a 2:1 ratio
for any educational facility that may come within the City. He asked the City Attorney if it was
feasible at this time to approve the motion and have staff get back to the Commission after
contacting some of the other colleges regarding their ratio. If it was something less than the 2: 1,
the Commission could go back and say this was stilI approved, but the ratio would be adjusted.
Commissioner Tuchscher did not believe this project should be held up because of the possibility
of establishing a precedent. Assistant Attorney Rudolf agreed that Commission should approve
this project; find that 85 is adequate--2: 1 ratio plus the number of teachers for this project; have
staff report back to the Commission in the future; if as a result of that information the ratio was
too low, take the other information and not treat this as a precedent.
Commissioner Ray asked that the Commission amend the motion to say 113 parking spaces, and
not address the ratio until staff could return to the Commission. Assistant City Attorney Rudolf
said that would in effect amend the proposed Resolution No. PCC-93-26 to read "Be it further
resolved that pursuant to 19.54.050, the Planning Commission finds the project requires ~ 113
off-street parking spaces."
Assistant Planning Director Lee did not feel the Commission was establishing a precedent.
There were a number of issues which may not be the same issues if addressing another facility
at another location. He said it was not the type of situation being dealt with on a daily basis.
Each project in each location had its own uniqueness that needed to be looked at.
Chair Martin, after reviewing the motion, stated he would vote for the project.
Commissioner Tarantino asked for clarification regarding whether the motion contained painting
the curbs red. The maker of the motion said the curbs should be painted red.
Commissioner Ray said that in light of the previous comments, he would vote against it, because
he felt they were setting a precedent for future projects of this type, unless a motion was
entertained to eliminate any conversation within the text of ratio and include some verbiage that
would state that 113 parking spaces were adequate.
VOTE:
4-1 (Conunissioner Ray voted against; Conunissioners Fuller and Moot
excused)
I 7-go
- ~Lf-
C"mmissioner Tuchscher asked for confirmation that approval had been received from the State
Coastal Commission. The applicant confirmed.
MSUC (Tuchscher/Ray) 5-0 (Fuller and Moot excused) recommending that a memo be
drafted to Council, to be executed by the Planning Commission Chair, asking the Council
to favorably consider re-routing transit to this corner, when the item is brought before
them.
/ /- (~ /
- & J/-
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
Meeting Date
/~
5/18/93
ITEM TITLE:
PUBLIC HEARING: Considering Coastal Development Permit No. 63
to Allow an Academic University to be Located at 660 Bay Boulevard
1 7/,;. !I
RESOLUTION Adopting Negative Declaration IS-93-28 and
Issuing Coastal Development Permit No. 63 to allow an Academic
University at 660 Bay Boulevard
SUBMITTED BY: Community Development Director
REVIEWED BY: City Manager J~ ~ ~l
(4/5ths Vote: Yes _ No L)
BACKGROUND:
The Greenwald Company has submitted an application for a Coastal Development Permit to
allow an academic university to be located within an existing office building at 660 Bay
Boulevard. On March 23, 1993, the Council approved LCP Amendment No. 11 which would
allow a university within the Industrial: General land use designation of the Local Coastal
Program with approval of a Conditional Use Permit. Environmental review of the proposal was
conducted and Negative Declaration IS-93-28 was issued for the project. A conditional use
permit and a coastal development permit are required.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council hold a public hearing, consider public testimony, and adopt a resolution:
1. Adopting Negative Declaration IS-93-28; and
2. Issuing Coastal Development Permit No. 63 to allow an Academic University at
660 Bay Boulevard.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not Applicable
DISCUSSION:
National University proposes to lease approximate 8000 square feet of an existing industrial
office building located at 660 Bay Boulevard (northwest corner of Bay Boulevard and J Street)
to house classroom facilities. Classes will be held weekday evenings between 5:30 p.m. and
10:00 p.m. and the class support office will be open during the daytime beginning at 7:00 a.m.
A maximum of 150 students per day are anticipated.
1)>-\
Item:_ Page~
Meeting Date: 5/18/93
The existing building has 113 on-site parking spaces. Eighty-five of those spaces will be
designated for National University's use during the evening hours. (Recommended conditions
of approval for the project's conditional use permit include that any increase in student
population would require that additional parking be provided.)
The Planning and Engineering Departments and the Environmental Review Coordinator have
reviewed the project. It was found that the project will have no significant environmental effects
and no major land use issues.
Based on the following findings, the proposed project, subject to conditions listed in Attachment
If to the resolution, the proposed project is found to be consistent with the Certified Local
Coastal Program.
1. The project site is currently developed with a 34,000 sq. ft. industrial business
office building and does not provide coastal reliant recreational facilities or access to coastal
reliant recreational facilities. The proposal, if undertaken, will not conflict or impact
recreational or visitor-serving facilities to be located on or adjacent to the coast.
2. The project will not interfere with coastal access or coastal traffic circulation.
The project is located almost adjacent to the Interstate 5 on and off ramp at J Street which
provides direct access to Bay Boulevard adjacent to the coast or bay, therefore, traffic generated
by the project will not interact with coastal traffic.
3. The proposed land use is allowed by Conditional Use Permit. The proposed land
use has been reviewed and found, subject to conditions, to be consistent with the policies of the
Certified Local Coastal Program.
FISCAL IMPACT: No fiscal impact related to coastal issues is anticipated.
(Pam/Disk#12/CDP63.AII)
I ~ - 2.
RESOLUTION /? / ~ 'I
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ADOPTING NEGATIVE DECLARATION IS-93-28, AND ISSUING COASTAL
DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NO. 63 TO ALLOW AN ACADEMIC
UNIVERSITY AT 660 BAY BOULEVARD.
WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista Local Coastal Program (LCP) has been
certified by the California Coastal Commission; and,
WHEREAS, said LCP includes Coastal Development procedures determined by
the Commission to be legally adequate for the issuance of Coastal Development Permits and the
City of Chula Vista has assumed permit authority of the Chula Vista Coastal Zone; and,
WHEREAS, a public hearing was duly noticed and conducted on May 18, 1993,
in accordance with said procedures; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista has considered the
information in Negative Declaration IS-93-28 attached as Attachment I; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has approved Conditional Use Permit PCC-93-26;
and,
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, as "approving
authority" for the Chula Vista Coastal Zone, has reviewed the proposal to allow an academic
university at 660 Bay Boulevard.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA does hereby find, order, determine, and resolve as follows:
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista finds that the proposed project, subject to conditions
listed in Attachment II, is in conformance with the Chula Vista certified Local Coastal Program
because:
1. The project site is currently developed with a 34,000 sq. ft. industrial business
office building and does not provide coastal reliant recreational facilities or access to coastal
reliant recreational facilities. The proposal, if undertaken, will not conflict or impact
recreational or visitor-serving facilities to be located on or adjacent to the coast.
2. The project will not interfere with coastal access or coastal traffic circulation.
The project is located almost adjacent to the Interstate 5 on and off ramp at J Street which
provides direct access to Bay Boulevard adjacent to the coast or bay, therefore, traffic generated
by the project will not interact with coastal traffic.
)~:J
3. The proposed land use is allowed by Conditional Use Permit. The proposed land
use has been reviewed and found, subject to conditions, to be consistent with the policies of the
Certified Local Coastal Program.
The City of Chula Vista finds that the proposed project, subject to conditions listed in
Attachment II, is in conformance with the Chula Vista Certified Local Coastal Program and,
statewide and regional interpretive guidelines have been reviewed, and the proposed project has
been found to be in conformance with the public access and public recreational policies of
Chapter 3 of the Public Resources Code.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby approves Coastal
Development Permit No. 63.
Submitted by
Approved by
Chris Salomone, Executive Secretary
and Community Development Director
Bruce M. Boogaard
Agency General Counsel
(P AM/DISK#12/a:5-18cp63 .rso)
I r.. 'I
ATTACHMENT II
Coastal Development Permit #63
May 18, 1993
Conditions of Approval
The project proposal shall comply with:
1.
All conditions set forth in Council Resolution No.
Permit PCC-93-26 attached hereto as Exhibit A.
5 eAJJ N & /:)
..rr.;:-JA
(pamlDisk# 12/coapv163 .doc)
approving Conditional Use
I9S
17
I r;..5
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHUlA VISTA CITY
COUNCil APPROVING PCC-93-26, A REQUEST FOR A
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FOR A CONTINUING
EDUCATION/UNIVERSITY FACILITY AT 660 BAY
BOULEVARD IN THE I (GENERAL INDUSTRIAL) ZONING
DISTRICT
WHEREAS, a duly verified application for a conditional use permit was filed with
the City of Chula Vista Planning Department on January 28, 1993 by Foster
Properties, a General Partnership ("Applicant") in connection with a proposed lease
to National University; and,
WHEREAS, said application requests approval of a conditional use permit (PCC-
93-26) to allow a continuing education/university facility for 150 students and 10
staff per day of operation in an existing structure in the I (General Industrial) zoning
district ("Project") at 660 Bay Boulevard ("Project Site") (Attachment "A" in the Staff
Report); and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on April 28, 1993
and voted 4-to-1-to-2 recommending that the City Council approve subject Project;
and,
WHEREAS, the City Clerk set the time and place for a hearing on said
application and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its
publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and its mailing to property
owners within 1,000 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least ten days
prior to the hearing; and
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely
6:00 p.m. May 18, 1993 in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the
City Council and said hearing was thereafter closed; and
WHEREAS, the Commission found that the project would have no significant
environmental impacts and adopted the Negative Declaration issued on IS-93-28.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED THAT the City Council of the City of
Chula Vista does hereby find:
1 . That the project will have no significant environmental impacts and adopt
the Negative Declaration issued on 15-93-28.
The City Council hereby finds that the Project will have no significant
environmental impacts in that the Project does not have:
/~b
EXHIBIT A
Resolution No.
Page #2
A. The potential to degrade the quality of the environment,
substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause
a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels,
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the
number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or
animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory.
B. The potential to achieve short-term, to the disadvantage of long
term, environmental goals.
C. Impacts which are individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable.
D. Effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human
beings, either directly or indirectly.
The following findings are required pursuant to Section 19.14.080 of the
Municipal Code:
2. That the proposed use at the particular location is necessary or desirable
to provide a service or facility which will contribute to the general well
being of the neighborhood or the community.
The conditional approval of PCC-93-26 at the proposed location is
necessary and desirable in order to provide a service which will
contribute to the general well being of the community in that there is an
existing, under-utilized facility in place, and the service to be provided by
National University will contribute to the community by providing an
educational facility for the South Bay area.
3. That such use will not, under the circumstances of the particular case,
be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons
residing or working in the vicinity, or injurious to property or
improvements in the vicinity.
The conditional approval of PCC-93-26 will not, under the circumstances
of the particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety or general
welfare of persons residing or working in the project vicinity or injurious
to property or improvements in the project vicinity in that class hours
and business hours do not conflict and adequate ingress, egress and
parking are provided thus minimizing the possibility of traffic and parking
conflicts.
F:\HOME\PLANNING\MARTlN\NA TUNI\9326CC.RES
18''' ?
EXH\B\T A
Resolution No.
Page #3
4. That the proposed use will comply with the regulations and conditions
specified in this code for such use.
The conditional approval of PCC-93-26 complies with the regulations and
conditions of the Municipal Code in that the project is conditioned to
comply with the requirements of all applicable City departments and will
not generate excessive traffic and will provide 85 off-street parking
spaces in accordance wit the Planning Commission determination,
pursuant to the Chula Vista Municipal Code, Section 19.62.050.
5. That the granting of this conditional use permit will not adversely affect
the general plan of the City or the adopted plan of any government
agency.
The conditional approval of PCC-93-18 will not adversely affect the
General Plan, the Baytront Redevelopment Plan, or the Local Coastal
Program (LCP) of the City of Chula Vista in that universities are
unclassified uses which are allowed in any zoning district upon approval
of a conditional use permit. The recently approved LCP Amendment No.
11 has make the proposed use a conditionally permitted use under the
LCP.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL hereby grants
conditional use permit PCC-93-25 subject to the following conditions whereby the
applicant shall:
1. Improve the Project Site with the Project for a maximum of 150 students
and 10 staff per day of operation.
2. Submit an application to amend this conditional use permit and the
Negative Declaration issued on 15-93-28 at such time as National
University plans to enlarge the student and staff population beyond 1 50
students and 10 staff. If it cannot be shown that parking is adequate,
National University shall limit its student and staff population to the
maximum approved at that time.
3. Prior to allowing occupancy by National University:
A. Provide a minimum of 8 bike parking spaces (1 space for every 20
students), the location of which shall be approved by the Director
of Planning.
F:\HOME\PLANNING\MART1N\NA TUNI\9326CC.RES
J~8'
rVUlfWf A
l~Hf%\Ul~~I' t\
Resolution No.
Page #4
B. Comply with and implement all requirements of the Chula Vista
Municipal Code and applicable Fire Department and Building
Department requirements, as appropriate.
C. Paint the curbs at the southern and northern entrances red and
post "NO PARKING" signs.
4. This permit shall be subject to any and all new, modified or deleted
conditions imposed after approval of this permit to advance a legitimate
governmental interest related to health, safety or welfare which the City
shall impose after advance written notice to the Permittee and after the
City has given to the Permittee the right to be heard with regard thereto.
However, the City, in exercising this reserved right/condition, may not
impose a substantial expense or deprive Permittee of a substantial
revenue source which the Permittee can not, in the normal operation of
the use permitted, be expected to economically recover.
5. This conditional use permit shall be in full force and effect during the
term of the lease between Applicant and National University for the use
specified herein, and any extensions thereof.
6. This conditional use permit shall become void and ineffective if not
utilized within one year form the effective date thereof, in accordance
with Section 19.14.260 of the Municipal Code. Failure to comply with
any condition of approval shall cause this permit to be reviewed by the
City for additional conditions or revocation.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL hereby grants
conditional use permit PCC-93-25 subject to the adoption of the required Coastal
Development Permit to allow subject use in the I (General Industrial) Zone as a
conditional use.
That a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the applicant.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
Robert A. Leiter
Director of Planning
Bruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
F:\HOME\PLANNING\MARTIN\NA TUNI\9326CC.RES
18"1
EX"lSllA
FileNo.
PUBUC HEARING CHECK UST
CITY COUNCIL PUBUC HEARING DA:rn 'K l' 'l., Iq'l3 . .
SUBJECT ~....lv- ~~: t _ ) Cc-., -t...L ~...J (i....,:J.j:\,,: ] ~,';:ttJ
ll6Cn.lIv~~ ~i- O~I., ~ ~ __ .J,.~:...9.. ~_ o.:..~
€ 1.<'-0 ~O ~'"'' Q,
SENT TO STAR NEWS FOR PUBUCATION -- BY FAX /; BY HAND_; BY MAIL
PUBUCATION DATE S I);' /q.3
MAILED NOTICES TO PROPERTY OWNERS
NO. MAILED
PER GC 54992 Legislative Scaff, Construction Industry Fed, 6336 Greenwich Dr Suite F. San Diego, 92122
LOGGED IN AGENDA BOOK V S /5 I q.,3
COPIES TO:
Administration (4) V'"
Planning v'
Originating Department
Engineering ~
Others
City Clerk's Office (2) ~
~/~/~
POST ON BULLETIN BOARDS
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:
-58-
Ir~//
PUBLIC HEARING NOTICE
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA for the purpose of
considering Coastal Development Permit No. 63 to allow an academic university to occupy
existing Industrial General space buildinl!.
The project is located at 660 Bay Boulevard which is located in the Coastal Zone. A copy of
the Coastal Development Permit application is on file for inspection in the office of Community
Development Department.
An Initial Study, IS-93-28, of possible significant environmental impacts has been conducted by
the Environmental Review Coordinator. A finding of no significant environmental impact has
been recommended to the City Council and is on file, along with the Initial Study, in the Office
of the Planning Department.
Any petitions to be submitted to the City Council must be received by the Community
Development Department office no later than 5:00 p.m. one (1) day prior to the hearing date.
If you wish to challenge the City's action on this Coastal Development Permit in court, you may
be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described
in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at or prior to the public
hearing.
Within ten (10) days following the Coastal Commission's receipt of the City Council's action
on the above coastal development proposal, said action may be appealed to the California
Coastal Commission by a qualified appellate. If the City is not notified within the prescribed
time element of a pending appeal, the City Council action will be deemed final and a Coastal
Development Permit issued.
Said public hearing will be held by the City Council on May 18. 1993. The hearing will be at
6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista,
at which time any person desiring to be heard may appear.
(pHntce.MST)
/f{>/A
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE
CITY COUNCIL of the City of Chula Vista, California, for the
purpose of considering an application for a conditional use permit
(PCC-93-26) . The application, submitted by Foster Properties,
requests authorization to operate an educational facility at 660
Bay Boulevard (APN 571-330-20) in the I (General Industrial) Zone,
of approximately 8,000 square feet with hours of operation of 5:30
p.m. to 10:00 p.m. weekdays to be operated by National University
for a maximum of 150 students and 10 staff. A plot plan and legal
description are on file in the office of the Planning Department.
An Initial Study, IS-93-28, of possible significant environmental
impacts has been conducted by the Environmental Review Coordinator.
A finding of no significant environmental impact has been
recommended to the Planning Commission and is on file, along with
the Initial Study, in the office of the Planning Department. Any
petitions to be submitted to the City Council must be received by
the City Clerk no later than noon of the hearing date.
If you wish to challenge the City's action on this conditional use
permit in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues
you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this
notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at
or prior to the public hearing.
SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL on Tuesday,
May 18, 1993, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Services
Building, 276 Fourth Avenue, at which time any person desiring to
be heard may appear.
DATED: May 4, 1993
CASE NO. PCC-93-26
Beverly Authelet, City Clerk
: \HOME\PLANNING\MARTIN\NATUNI\9326CC. LEG
)1r~13
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE
CITY COUNCIL of the City of Chula Vista, California, for the
purpose of considering an application for a conditional use permit
(PCC-93-26) . The application, submitted by Foster Properties,
requests authorization to operate an educational facility at 660
Bay Boulevard (APN 571-330-20 see locator map on reverse) of
approximately 8,000 square feet with hours of operation of 5:30
p.m. to 10:00 p.m. weekdays to be operated by National University.
A plot plan and legal description is on file in the office of the
Planning Department.
An Initial Study, IS-93-28, of possible significant environmental
impacts has been conducted by the Environmental Review Coordinator.
A finding of no significant environmental impact has been
recommended to the City Council and is on file, along with the
Initial Study, in the office of the Planning Department. Any
petitions to be submitted to the City Council must be received by
the City Clerk's office no later than noon of the hearing date.
If you wish to challenge the City's action on this conditional use
permit in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues
you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this
notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council
at or prior to the public hearing.
SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL on Tuesday,
May 18, 1993 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Services
Building, 276 Fourth Avenue, at which time any person desiring to
be heard may appear.
DATED:
May 5, 1993
CASE NO.
PCC-93-26
Beverly Authelet, City Clerk
COMPLIANCE WITH AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA)
The City of Chula Vista, in complying with the American With Disabilities Act,
requests individuals who require special accommodation to access, attend and/or
participate in a City meeting, activity or service request such accommodation at
least 48 hours in advance for meetings and 5 days for scheduled services and
activities. Please contact Nancy Ripley for specific information at (619) 691-5101.
California Relay Service is available for the hearing impaired.
F:\HOME\PLANNING\MARTIN\NATUNI\9326PUB.NOT
) <;{ //'-/
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ',}: /" .
RINA VIEW PARK,'.': ; j
_ _,';:"_I.o-_"..J
'- - - - -
I
~
.:t .
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
.
l:J - ,-', r-- ... ~'a
..' ;,--
. .., ., . . t-
"~"':;"-~:
1 ~...._ ' _
, ' I' Co rl......;...~T IT
f-.--.< -- ~ : J-
... .
.0 . -. .
f- .-
~ f- -
-
r f-- -
f-
.. - -
- -
- - - -
- ,.-
- r-
- - r---
f- HA\.SEY r---
" -- -
f- -
t-- -
w ,
w
r_ ::;) ::;) ,; i-
z z
- <oJ <oJ <oJ
> > > ~r-
- <t <t <t
,.-- rr n:
f- r--
It - I I ~'"1: ~.
- ,..,
-- - I-
. - .-
-
r-- - ,-
-
1- - .- I-
I-- S.
- KE IRNEY
- -' -
- - I- .- '.
- z 'i
1- 0 ~
0 <t <t_
- <l ..J ..J
- a: 0 >t:
r-- 0 0 <t
..J 0
I-- 0 ~
- u
I~' ~ ;:.fPee' r--r
. - -----'-r- ~, r-'
- ." -
- , t- -' -- -
- - c- - r-- --
J
- t-- f- " I f-
I -
~- Attachment I'A iI -
=J
..-
)
)
( NATIOf,jAl- \)N~~?rrr
~ BAY~
NnR;~ ( PvC--"'1,-70
LOCATOR
io f<;TA~SH -A>-.J ~')'/~i1~AL-
, ,
~AC.-I\...ln 11--1 111 I
s.
L ABL 00430 PCC-li3-2b
I NDUSTR IAL: OfF ICE l:SU ILDING Al
X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX;'.
X XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX.
X XXX XX X XXX X XX XX XX X XXX XX XX XX XX.'.
X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX"
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX~
X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX:.
X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX .
X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX,;
X XXX XX X XXX X XX XX XX X XXX XXXX XX XX .'.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX:
5711600800
SAN DIEGO GAS/ELECTRIC CO
~. . NT, EB-7
~li2112
5713301500
RATNER DEv ELOPMENT CO
C/O GR E EN~,-A.LJUM C 0 DNA LD
- -
S AN DIEGO CA 'iZ108
5713301000 .
SAN DIEGO GAS/ELECTRIC CO
~NT, EB-7
~92112
5713301700
ROHR INC .
~.
~CA li191i
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX(
xxxxxxxxxxxxxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXI
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxXXXXXXXXXXXXl
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX}
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX>
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX>
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX}
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXl
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXl
XX XX XX XX XX XXXX XX xx XXXX XXXX XX Xl
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX:
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXl
5711701000
RATNER OEVELUPMENT CU
~NWALU/MC~NALD
o CA 9n08
5713301600
SAN UIEGU/ARIZUNA EASH:RN RAIl
SAN UIEGO, CA 9i101
57133013UO
ROHR INC
CHULA wISTA CA 91912
57133019UO
RATNER D~VEL9PMENT CULD
i/U GREENW1~(H~ DONA
SAN DIEGU CA 92108
jfr>/tf,
ATTACHMEN1.l
negative declaration
PROJECT NAME: National University (660 Bay Boulevard)
PROJECT LOCATION: 660 Bay Boulevard, Chula Vista. The project site is located
on the west side of Bay Boulevard, north of 1 Street See
Exhibits 1 and 2
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 571-330-20
PROJECT APPLICANT: Bennet Greenwald, Foster Properties
CASE NO: 15-93-28 DATE: February 22, 1993
A. Proiect Setting
The National University site is located at 660 Bay Boulevard, and is within the Chula
Vista Bayfront (Local Coastal Program (LCP) area and the Bayfront Redevelopment Plan
Area. The building already exists, and is located on the west side of Bay Boulevard,
north of J Street. The project area is urbanized. Rohr Industries, Inc. surrounds the site
to the north, west and south; 1-5 is located on the other side of Bay Boulevard to the east.
See Exhibits I and 2 which show the vicinity location and site plan.
B. Proiect Description
The National University project proposes to use approximately 8,000 square feet of a
23,452 sq. ft. existing building for 7 classrooms and associated office space approximately
150 students are expected to use this facility. The hours of National University would
be 5:30 to 10:30 p.m. on weekdays, with some academic daytime seminars or academic
activities.
The discretionary approvals required are: a Local Coastal Program (LCP) Amendment
and a Conditional Use Pennit (CUP) from the City to allow the educational uses in this
Industrial:General category. Upon approval of the LCP Amendment and CUP, a Coastal
Development Pennit from the City would also be required. LCP Amendment No. II is
presently being processed by the City, and if approved. would allow educational and child
care uses within the Industrial General category of land use, with a CUP. No change is
being proposed to the land use designation of the LCP Land Use Plan, the General Plan,
or the Bayfront Redevelopment Plan. Thus, the proposed activities do not create
inconsistency with the aforementioned plans.
C. Identification of Environmental Effects
Based on the Initial Study (attached) the City finds that there is no substantial evidence
that the Project may have a significant adverse effect on the environment. Thus, an
~(ft-
-.-
..._--~
-
;3>/7
I
city of chula vista planning department
environmental review ..ction
CITY OF
CHULA VISTA
. .' IS \ 4; ; ;;..t;;:.~?.1 ~\7.\ ~~c,
A " I ", c,~ -t-': I' :".. Q .. - ~ r-.~ _~r~..:",".:r,-,'? ~-'-'_~ l1'''i'I~I~'
~ .. ~ '" ~ ~~.", s~ , r " "~;;;' ",.:.;;.:;:-~ . .....~~~, . ~
--. c'" ~ ... . ~, . '" o1::\~S '" """ ..,;}. ~ l<~. ,~ >.
,~ ~ -t- ",..... ",.~. ..ll : ' " ,.,. Cl
7-:" . '~ . I 3.~ ~\\~.~'" 0 ~\ ~:; Q I. ~~' y-rr~:~~.'1\'1 : ) ^'::ft..~ ~J~
~ ST :... ...~!~ ~ \\ ~ I 1fS.;Et~~ 9:;11 ~ -l., ';.~.~~, ~
.- '~ru\' '" ~ - 'rl, ~ '\ ". ..' " .,tP.q,~~..,~,"'''''';:'~___~_~'
.. ~~ ~ .~ 0 ". ~1 ~ ",(\ ~r"'\}' .,;, ~ 1Y .-' ~ I ," '{;;,:.:~-J.ol ~ I ',:: -.r'/'::::-r"1 ::..:;
-. ~ "'t~' 1 < "'P "':1 l-<f' ~~D -t- ~ ~ ":~ii:;::''''' .l;:.. ~ ~.
~f-- . \ ~ _ . h-c",O _ .,.':'" .~,:z... :...J.:o...:r. .1 ,.~~. _
J , "':'Jl' , c.'{ \~ ~'\ TCMlW . ax.wrlt'N _ $WE
- ~ "',,-1l::\: . WAn
"7 ~\~.~ - - _, -.5 !)" 'li' ;,;~;7g,,'
'& -'1,\1...-' ~ ,; ~ ~ ~ I.~ -.l\ I~ ..'"<~
". I ,I' '" ~~.--\ ' . '", ~. , '\
" .' ~ i ''<:,...'\<~. ~ : .~ ~ .. ~r""~"~~~ I <'
~ I ~~.. ~ I ~ ......-s< 4::n:...... 0
~ ~ ~I ... ~.. '~:!4- ~.. ~r .,/::it~~G':,:
~ ~ ': ----, ~(' ~ rY~c jf-~ tr
-- ---i~r~4J'!. \ -,f> -- I '- .,:"..<.;~~~.,~ 'P'd r,: - ;:.o::/;-
I':~. ,~ :~ ~~{{:.:,01;o\ \" ", ~ ."'" "'k~ ~ ~~\<
~ I .-:;.- t'''''<'''' ~:~\ ~ ~ "YJ' ~ \0 "."':" Fl.
;.~ \ ~,' ,,,,,- .{j,S-~ ~J.FH' I r ". ~ s'
~ ~ \ ;;-i;"T' ",\ "', ....~\ ~ ~ 'l' ~', -",. O"'O'O'~
~~ '.. ~ .\ ~ - L~ I;~,~,\o(
--' I 1\ c~,\ ~~;.. ~~ o't'-l_-QI'~.".I,'~i~s,
~,~ : ~ C;~r7"'Ca"~:~" ;'}~~' .~~l.....-\~t::'\.l'~f,r;,<~~)!\~JJ" c, ~~
' \\\ ....". ~ t ~~<"~' ."1 \ ~ '" '.\'l.\_,",-cG
\ ,. 11 tY ~\ : '\ M N::: ~- \ 1r .,.
-I---~+------ .~;\~' t-~~\~,rn '---Ch'<:~ ~ :!\{\oli.r<~~.~ _ ~~,
' I ~ ~~I\~~"L , . ~R "'-'"U(' 1'. ~--,~.1."1.. ~
i I R H~rr [P \~l SP ')'l~ c.~=""!"'-~.:.1t ~~~~. 'E
GUNPOWDER " ~~~, I \~,..V--~ -r~\~0~~'v~;~l\'.;ia 'en \
"I ~,~- ~ < '" ~ ~l~ p~ '),~'\~~~ f ~ST '"
~ 'on \ ~ ".." S' .~ "- s"..... '~",.oo '\,,: G
: "-i- 0 ~ ~ ~,.\,. ...
\ ,- ,,.\10. l": 51 I :\ ~...
I ,;e? \.; r. "'_ <5 .JP~'.. 0 S r~"" ."""i,,
I I 0 ~ ~:; SCR,~:;...l, !~,.. ~~
~ \ I v~ ~ ~ '>l,...c~ ....~\."l ~~~~!:f ~ ~J8IfT 1S""''''\ "'''':'f ~~\l \
\ ! 'I Q. 0 ~oQS s,... ;(. .ux; ~ ~"",,("I _ ~
I ' O,,~-C: .. ~, ~ ,,, ~..,,", ",'
I +~'.~ ~~ ? '" "j. t.\.c;.(
- -----~---- ';:--- /-- -:l?~ p,\I'!\ ,7;!;~ ~ \'.. ~j. - .
. I 'OA' "< //1 :z: \';. '''''F!! ~ ",,~f!f l"'~ \.. ~ ~ ",,~__
~ : I.AVNCH I ';..\ ~ -SH~^'G f:'".I 1l. l.... "i.
1 . ~I 0 ~ClIV..rr'!....'7 G~S: C;.'1I\r-- (" oC!
' CHUf..,A I . l' "".;t PS ~ ~ ~ :"'; 'L
VISTA T ~ t ~~".\;. ~ ~-1'\ 0 "" .. . ~ '" S
,[ '~~~ '" ....,.".. "\'.'Ii:~ .. "o~ ',c." ~""..
......... aA'f'$IOC \ I ~~ ,'7M . ('" a'g.oQ c:') 2. -:. "'"
~ b....CH '. ~ .. <5 't,':.' ~'O ~<;, ,["~"., '
"-- \ ~ t'( O.c~ ~..~,..~ l" Jt. f'O"
,...... \ ~AJ \.,!:i'f .\\~~ _s s ~'1?: ~ .
~ I..... \=-" OM.A "{\~ ~ ''<~ >tttWr% '1 r -= ~~....~
: I ~ -..~ ~ ~- ,\~\i i~~~~~- . "'. ~ ",
-- ~' . - - --t ~ ---- j 'OA;~~ ' \ .:\\{{~JJ~ ~, ,~~...l.. ~~~~f!f:' 0 ;~'-.~,c,,'
I ~ =- <J>""" ~\~....-o \\1:<. ~ r /-to ,..~
I
. t
j .','.
Snlh"
~ il1nlil!
~ P b,!ll
lill!'IW!
~ 1.ll'i!!
11.1111,1"11"
~11!l!; 11
. r,lll!l\;:~ t
.1\!!h!,W l
I"." I'~I'" '\ I....' PI
l.r, !,,'ll Ii .Iq ,'.
,'n' li-i," "II'" ijl
~,,; Ii;:;: -!;: ~ I! I I ~j
i l.lll lhi:.. I,. 'I~( Ijl
.Ii" j;.kilili';: I,'
; j i :i. !: !:: ~ I : 1; i;: I, ~::
li"l 'l,~!llll: dl. '\1
l,;~, ;l;i::: l:; ':,il III t=-
111'liI,1l1;!..,j:11111'1-
l_j'1l11l1':lil:l,,-!i11/i "'1
I . I'" l'" t., ~ i I . II;. I,',
hil:~ !:iF!: Hi ill!; }\\I . 1
tll:l. on n I' ';IJ! '~: I '
It1t:ll1thtJ .:QI~t !Ii t I
- .
q IJ . ,
Iii I:, _ t
., ill.""
ili I', I! i
.11.1 I.
!'I 'j. II!
lu iI' ~
. r! ,!l " .
jl!. w! : II
'1.1'l'il,1 I
'i"I' 'Itll
... " .; r' ~ !ii: )l~ ~ ~ ! j
Ii I. III 1.1'1" i ~,
i I ~ I' I ~ II .:~!
Ii r,: >.1,1 i ill
I' . !': : I' ~L II I'.
.'I! I!'I :;';'l' 'I
II t: ri':. i Ilj~ ~ :J 11 ,
Ii n IH, !~ t ~p~ ~ !~ i! I
; I . J ! j \; 11 I j I ~ j ! I! ! 1 I
III ~ 1:-' Ji ~!l' 1 i 'I '
,: ~::; H;; ill ::~! Ii H J
J: j ~ - .. -"-
I" -"'f'" - . .
. ,'r;:'.t . "."~_." ,", >... '
J". 'l" -'~ .
.~,., '.. ....
. .!~ -I"' S"i ' i
: :-'\.l~~:""'!.'." e .. ,
,I '-'I!' "". JJ..' ,
. "/ ~'i~.)~~&:~ ;.'- , .
\ ." ;~1~;~. ,;:\\ . " :I I
.,,~r.
"~_~. I:. ,\.. ~
~-;-:"lLJ I.~il. 6
: ; :-;t-:", :_~:: I: '_~ (I
J:"~"<b_,.. ~. ~
. ~,"~~-~-b~~,)~ ~
. ~!...: l;"~.,".:_ ~-( -
~.t..-'\.u.-;"n" . ",,-:-
-, -.... - '...,
.l>.-~I.>-"n~
\
l.R",q~
Lq L.I..t
IA,~-'" 9
~
~ .. ..."
-.-....-......
.-
....-...........
""""~
"H\J 00' ~ ~Q'. , ~o, lU'J1T"J ....."....
1..LO"'l j.l'("'J"3.,l.Mo
---'---'"
l
~ ~
~
.:3
SITE PLAN (BUILDING ALREADY CONSTRUCTED)
EXHIBIT 2
I~W
I
J
.
. "
~ ' .
.H -
i G :J~
~ .-
~ 1r
.'" "" J
Ji
CI j~ J
~ Iii
a:}-
'" i',.
a: III
z .1
-"
li' ~
"
i'l ~
..J '
Il. I
w ;,
=! ~
j
if> ,
Ih III ?
J.mll' !
I'~-' ~ l
~1.Jl ~~~ (
~2((; ~r -
11,.. !l' ~
I'i;~ !i~ Ji
~~ \ t 1:;,(1 II
,:J'" ,bl'
, " ~'" '
(~~ (~f"'" ~~
al.1:~ 'I
1)~otw ij
,jv c~~ II
It..~ Jt"":" )
..~~~( t..;~ .
Environmental Impact Report will not be required. This Negative Declaration has been
prepared in accordance with Sections 15070 through 15073 of the State CEQA
Guidelines.
D. Mitigation necessary to avoid significant effects
The proposed project is not associated with any significant or potentially significant
environmental impacts, therefore, no project specific mitigation will be required or
necessary .
E. Consultation
1. Individuals and Organizations
City of Chula Vista: Roger Daoust, Engineering
Cliff Swanson, Engineering
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering
Garry Williams, Planning
Maryann Miller, Planning
Ken Larsen, Director of Building & Housing
Carol Gove, Fire Marshal
Captain Keith Hawkins, Police Department
Marti Schmidt, Parks & Recreation Dept.
Pamela Buchan, Community Development Dept.
Rich Rudolf, Assistant City Attorney
Chula Vista City School District: Kate Shurson
Sweetwater Union High School District: Torn Silva
Applicant's Agent: Mr. Bennett Greenwald, Foster Properties
2. Documents
Chula Vista General Plan (I989) and EIR (I 989)
Title 19, Chula Vista Municipal Code
Chula Vista Bayfront Local Coastal Program (amended 1989)
Bayfront Redevelopment Project Plan (1974)
Revised Traffic Impact Analysis for proposed National University Project (KMB
Consulting, February 16, 1993)
Wp(' F:\HO\{E\['O\1\1DE\'\.<i81.93
II) -20
tf
Page 2
3. Initial Studv
This environmental detennination is based on the attached Initial Study, any
comments received on the Initial Study and any comments received during the
public review period for the Negative Declaration. The report reflects the
independent judgment of the City of Chula Vista. Further infonnation regarding
the environmental review of this project is available from the Chula Vista
Planning Department, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 92010.
Jb.t~ P-uMutJ.J
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COORDINATOR
EN 6 (Rev. 12/90)
Attachments: Vicinity Map
Site Plan
s
/ '~:z (
WPC PHO~OM\IDE\,\..c;81.93
Page 3
..P9g~~~g!!9!J~~1!!9.~~!
t,
Ig-~
APPENDIX I
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
(To Be Completed By Lead Agency)
Background
1. Name of Proponent: Foster Properties c/o the Greenwald Company
2. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 740 Bay Boulevard. Suite 200. Chula Vista. CA 91910
3. Date of Checklist: 2-17-93
4. Name ot Proposal: National University
5. Inijial 5tudy Number: 15-93-28
Environmental Impacts
1. Earth. Will the proposal resuit in:
YES MAYBE NO
a.
Unstable earth conditions or changes
in geologic substructures?
.
o
o
b.
Disruptions. displacements. compaction
or overcovering of the soil?
.
o
o
c.
Change in topography or ground surface
relief features?
.
o
o
d.
The destruction. covering or
modification of any unique geologic
or physical features?
.
o
o
e.
Any increase in wind or water erosion
of soils. either on or off the sije?
.
o
o
f.
Changes in deposition or erosion of
beach sands. or changes in smation,
deposition or erosion which may modrty
the channel of a river or stream or the
bed of the ocean or any bay, inlet or
lake?
.
o
o
g.
Exposure of people or property to
geologic hazards such as earthquakes,
landslides, mud slides, ground failure,
or similar hazards?
.
o
o
Comments:
The National University (660 Bay Boulevard) project would be located in a building that is already
constructed. Parking would be located on the existing parking lot. Thus, no disturbance to the
grou nd would be necessary to achieve this project, and no signrticant impacts would occur.
! 3-2-5\:
2. Air. Will the proposal resutt in: YES MAYBE NO
a. Substantial air emissions or
deterioration of ambient air
qu ality? 0 0 .
b. The creation of objectionable
odors? 0 0 .
c. Alteration of air movement,
moisture, or temperature, or any
change in climate, either locally
or regionally? 0 0 .
Comments:
The National University Project would not directly produce any emissions, as the building
already exists, and the uses will be classroom. Vehicles accessing the site produce
emissions, but as shown in the attached Traffic Impact Analysis, the University-related trips
are minimally greater than trips associated with commercial-office uses (at most, 380
trips/day greater), and occur during the off-peak times. Additionally, it is anticipated that
this National University location would relieve longer distance trips to other parts of the
county, thereby reducing the amount of emissions associated with these trips. No
signiticant air quality impact is thus expected.
3.
g.
Water. Will the Proposal resutt in:
YES MAYBE NO
a.
Changes in currents, or the course
or direction of water movements,
in either marine or fresh waters?
.
o
o
b.
Changes in absorption rates,
drainage patterns, or the rate
and amount of surface runoff?
.
o
o
c.
Atterations to the course or flow
of flood waters?
.
o
o
d.
Change in the amount of surface
water in any water body?
.
o
o
e.
Discharge into surface waters, or
any aiteration of surface water
quality, including but not limited
to temperature, dissolved oxygen
or turbidity?
.
o
o
f.
Aiteration of the direction or
rate of flow of ground waters?
.
o
o
Change in the quantity of ground
waters, either through direct
additions or withdrawals, or
through interception of an aquiter
by cu1s or excavations?
o
o
.
15
I
/ J.-~ 1-
h.
Substantial reduction in the
amount of water otherwise
available for public water
supplies?
.
o
o
i.
Exposure of people or property to
water related hazards such as
flooding or tidal waves?
.
o
[J
Comments:
The National Univers~y project would not affect, nor be affected by water movements.' The project
s~e is already constructed, and has sufficient drainage systems to convey runoff (see Engineering
Department Routing Form). Thus, no significant impacts to water movements would occur.
Regarding water supply, the National University project would not use water other than to service
typical personal needs, and would not consume unusually large amounts of water. Thus, no
significant impacts to water supply would occur.
4.
Plant Life. Will the proposal resun in:
YES MAYBE NO
a.
Change in the divers~y of species,
or number of any species of plants
(including trees, shrubs, grass,
crops, and aquatic plants)?
.
[J
[J
b.
Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species
of plants?
.
[J
[J
c.
Introduction of new species of
plants into an area, or in a
barrier to the normal replenish-
ment of existing species?
.
o
[J
d.
Reduction in acreage of any
agricunural crop?
.
[J
[J
Comments:
The National University project would not affect biological resources as the facility is already buin,
and no change in building structure or exterior lighting will occur. The entire project site and
immediate surrounding area is urbanized and supports no substantial natural resources.
5.
Animal Life. Will the proposal resun in:
YES MAYBE NO
a.
b.
Change in the divers~y of species,
or numbers of any species of
animals (birds, land animals
including reptiles, fish and
shelifish, benthic organisms or
insects)?
[J
[J
.
Reduction of the numbers of any
unique, rare or endangered species
of animals?
[J
[J
.
/J'~5
9
16
c.
Introduction of new species of
animals into an area, or result
in a barrier to the migration or
movement of animals?
o
o
.
d.
Deterioration to existing fish or
wildl~e habitat?
o
o
.
Comments:
The National University project would not affect biological resources as the facility is already built,
and no change in building structure or exterior lighting will occur. The entire project site and
immediate surrounding area is urbanized and supports no substantial natural resources.
6. Noise. Will the proposal result in: YES MAYBE NO
a. Increases in existing noise
levels? 0 0 .
b. Exposure of people to severe
noise levels? 0 0 .
Comments:
The National University project would be located in an existing building. Potential noise
impacts to students of this facility would be avoided as the classrooms are located inside,
and protected from the high noise levels associated with 1.5. Traffic noise from vehicles
accessing the site would be insign~icant, and overwhelmed by the adjacent freeway noise.
Also, no sensitive receptors are located along the anticipated route of travel which is 1.5
to J Street and north on Bay Boulevard.
7.
Light and Glare. Will the proposal
produce new light or glare?
YES MAYBE NO
DO.
Comments:
The National University facility would create no new exterior lighting. Vehicles, however, would be
present until 10:30 p.m., creating new lighting from vehicle headlights. The paths of travel along
Bay Boulevard and J Street are not adjacent to residences or to weiland resources of the bay.
Thus, no sign~icantlighting impacts are expected.
8.
Land Use. Will the proposal result in
a substantial alteration of the present
or planned land use of an area?
YES MAYBE NO
o
o
.
Comments:
The National University educational uses would be located in a building constructed for
office uses. Classrooms for education are different than the previously anticipated uses,
thus requiring the CUP and the Local Coastal Program (LCP) Amendment. LCP
Amendment No. 11 is presently being processed to allow educational and child care uses
with a CUP in the General Industrial Land Use category of the Bayfront LCP area. Since
no land use designation changes are necessary for this project, no changes to the land
17
ID
I J-,zb
use designations of the Bayfront LCP, the Cny's General Plan or Redevelopment Plan are
proposed.
9.
Natural Resources. Will the proposal resun in:
YES MAYBE NO
a.
Increase in the rate of use of any
natural resources?
o
o
.
Comments:
The National Universny uses would not create a substantial increase in the use of natural
resources. In fact, the buildings are already buin, thus, occupation and use of the structure
is not a signijicant new source of natural resource consumption.
10.
Risk of Upset. Will the proposal involve:
YES MAYBE NO
a.
A risk of an explosion or the
release of hazardous substances
(including, bu1 not limned to oil,
pesticides, chemicals or radiation)
in the event of an accident or
upset conditions?
o
o
.
b.
Possible interference wnh an
emergency response plan or an
emergency evacuation plan?
o
o
.
Comments:
National University is not expected to use hazardous substances as part of the curriculum.
However, use of such substances is regulated by the County Department of Health Services,
Hazardous Materials Management Division, and by the City's Fire Department. Any use of such
materials requires documentation of the safe use and disposal of these materials. No other
regulation is necessary.
11.
Population. Will the proposal aner
the location, distribution, dens ny,
or growth rate of the human population
of an area?
YES MAYBE NO
o
o
.
Comments:
The location of National Universny in this facilny would not substantially aHer the population/housing
structure of the area, as this facilny is being proposed to provide a location for an existing need
for educational facilnies in this portion of the County.
12.
Housing. Will the proposal affect
existing housing, or create a demand
for additional housing?
YES MAYBE NO
o
o
.
Comments:
The location of National University in this facilny would not substantially aHerthe population/housing
structure of the area, as this facilny is being proposed to provide a location for an existing need
for educational facilnies in this portion of the County.
18
II
Ib'~7
13. Transportation/Circulation. Will the proposal resutt in: YES MAYBE NO
a. Generation of substantial
addttional vehicular movement? 0 0 .
b. Effects on existing parking
facilities. or demand for new
parking? 0 0 .
c. Substantial impact upon' existing
transportation systems? 0 0 .
d. Atterations to present pattems of
circulation or movement of people
and/or goods? 0 0 .
e. Atterations to waterborne, rail or
air traffic? 0 0 .
f. Increase in traffic hazards to
motor vehicles, bicyclists or
pedestrians? 0 0 .
g. A "large project" under the
Congestion Management Program?
(An equivalent of 2400 or more
average daily vehicle trips or
200 or more peak-hour vehicle
trips). 0 0 .
Comments:
See "Revised Traffic Impact Analysis for Proposed National Universtty Project," attached. The
conclusions of this report is that no sign~icant traffic circulation impacts would occur.
14. Public Services. Will the proposal have an effect upon, or resutt in a need for new or attered
govemmental services in any of the following areas:
YES MAYBE NO
a. Fire protection? 0 0 .
b. Police protection? 0 0 .
c. Schools? 0 0 .
d. Parks or other recreational
facilities? 0 0 .
e. Maintenance of public facilities,
including roads? 0 0 .
f. Other governmental services? 0 . 0
I~
19
I J --;2/5
Comments:
a.
g.
Fire Protection: 1) National University building already meets Fire Department
requirements for occupancy. No additional requirements. (See Fire Department
Routing form).
b.
Police Protection: Police services will not be sign~icantly affected by the operation of the
proposed National University project; no impacts have been ident~ied by the Police
Department.
c.
Schools: National University creates no impact to elementary and secondary schools
because no students would be generated. Since no new construction is associated with
the National University project, no statutory fees are required. This facility is providing
educational facilities to serve needs, resuiting in beneficial school i~acts.
d.
Parks/Recreation: No demand for parks/recreation would be a resuit of this project (see
Parks Department routing form). Also, public access to the recreational resources of the
Bayfront would not be affected by the proposal.
e.
Public Facilities Maintenance: National University would not substantially affect public
facilities, thus not requiring additional maintenance.
f.
Water: New water infrastructure, or substantial aiteration to the existing water
infrastructure may be necessary to provide the National University site with water for fire
flow requirements. This is not considered a potential environmental impact, rather a
necessity to coordinate water planning between the City's Fire Department and the
Sweetwater Authority which provides water service. Based on Sweetwater Authority's
Standard procedures, the applicant must submit a letter to Sweetwater Authority stating
Chula Vista Fire Department fire flow requirements. Sweetwater Authority will then
determine the ability of the system to provide the required fire flow. Facility improvements
may be required, which would be the responsibility of the applicant to provide. Occupancy
permits would not be issued by the City until fire flow is assured. This is standard
Sweetwater Authority and City procedure, and not mitigation required as a resuit of any
environmental impact.
Sewer: Sewer facilities are adequate 10 serve the National University project (see
Engineering Department routing form).
15. Energy. Will the proposal resuit in: YES MAYBE NO
a. Use of substantial amount of fuel
or energy? 0 0 .
b. Substantial increase in demand
upon existing sources or energy,
or require the development of new
sources of energy? 0 0 .
Comments:
Substantial amounts of new fuel would not be required to operate the proposed
educational facility.
1'3
20
/J -;z Cj
16.
Thresholds. Will the proposal
adversely impact the Crty's Threshold!
Standards Policies?
YES MAYBE NO
[J
[J
.
Comments:
As described below. the proposed educational facilrty does not adversely impact any of the eleven
Threshold Standards.
A. Fire/EMS
The Threshold Standard requires that fire and medical units must be able to respond to
calls wrthin 7 minutes or less in 85% of the cases and within 5 minutes or less in 75% of
the cases. The City of Chula Vista has indicated that this threshold standard will be met,
since the nearest fire station is approximately 3 miles away and would be associated with
a 5 minute response time. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard.
B. Police
The Threshold Standard requires that police unrts must respond to 84% of Priorrty 1 calls
within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priorrty 1 calls of 4.5
minutes or less. Police units must respond to 62% of Priority 2 calls wrthin 7 minutes or
less and maintain an average response time to all Priority 2 calls of 7 minutes or less. The
proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standards as the Police Department has
indicated that their ability to meet response time would not be adversely affected by this
project.
C. Traffic
The Threshold Standard requires that all intersections must operate at a Level of Service
(LOS) "C" or bener, wrth the exception that Level of Service (LOS) "0" may occur during
the peak two hours of the day at signalized intersections. Intersections west of 1-805 are
not to operate at a LOS below their 1987 LOS. No intersection may reach LOS "E" or "F"
during the average weekday peak hour. Intersections of arterials with freeway ramps are
exempted from this policy. The traffic generated by this proposed project will comply wrth
this Threshold Standard. See anached traffic report, KMB Consu~ing, for detailed
comments.
D. Parks/Recreation
The Threshold Standard for Parks and Recreation is 3 acres/1,000 population. The
proposed project will comply wrth this Threshold Standard; as rt is not applicable, since no
new population will be generated.
E. Drainage
The Threshold Standard requires that storm water flows and volumes not exceed Crty
Engineer Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary improvements consistent
with the Drainage Master Plan(s) and Crty Engineering Standards. The proposed project
will comply wrth this Threshold Standard, as the National Universrty site is already
adequately drained.
/If
21
I 3-30
F. Sewer
The Threshold Standard requires that sewage flows and volumes not exceed City
Engineering Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary ifT'4)rovernents consistent
with Sewer Master Plan(s) and City Engineering Standards. The proposed project will
comply with this Threshold Standard, as the National University site has adequate sewer
infrastructure.
G. Water
The Threshold Standard requires that adequate storage, treatment, and transmission
facilities are constructed concurrently with planned growth and that water quality standards
are not jeopardized during growth and construction. The proposed National University
project applicant must work with the City's Fire Department and Sweetwater Authority to
ensure that adequate infrastructure is available. Proof of adequacy must be given to the
City's Planning Department prior to the issuance of occupancy permits. This is standard
City procedure, and not a mitigation measure required by this Negative Declaration.
H. Schools
The Threshold Standard requires that the City provide the school districts with a 12 to 18
month development forecast, and request student absorption ability information from the
districts. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard as it does affect
it. The proposed project does not generate students or create impacts on the school
districts' abilities to accommodate students.
I. Libraries
The Threshold Standard requires 500 square feet of library space per 1,000 population.
The proposed project does not generate additional population and will comply with this
Threshold Standard because it does not affect it.
J. Air Quality
The Threshold Standard requires that the 'City provide the San Diego Air Pollution Control
District with a 12 to 18 month development forecast, and request an evaluation of its
impact on air quality and management plans. The proposed project will comply with this
Threshold Standard. The proposed project will not create air quality impacts.
K. Fiscal
The Threshold Standard requires that the Growth Management Oversight Committee be
provided with an annual report which provides an evaluation of fiscal impacts of growth on
the City. The proposed project does not directly affect this Threshold Standard, though
implementation of the project and its fiscal effect will be included within the annual report
and evaluation.
17.
Human Health. Will the proposal resutt in:
YES MAYBE NO
a.
Creation of any hea~h hazard or
potential hea~h hazard (excluding
mental hea~h)?
o
o
.
/5
22
IJ - 3/
b.
Exposure of people to potential
heatth hazards?
lJ
lJ
.
Comments:
No human heatth hazard would be created by classroom uses of National University, nor would
the students be exposed to any human heatth hazard in the existing 660 Bay Boulevard building.
18.
Aesthetics. Will the proposal resutt
in the obstruction of any scenic vista
or view open to the public, or will the
proposal resutt in the creation of an
aesthetically offensive site open to
public view?
YES MAYBE NO
lJ
lJ
.
Comments:
Occupation of the 660 Bay Boulevard building by National University would not change the
aesthetic nature of the project area.
19.
Recreation. Will the proposal resutt
in an impact upon the quality or
quantity of existing recreational
opportunities?
YES MAYBE NO
lJ
lJ
.
Comments:
No demand for parks/recreation would be a resutt of this project (see Parks Department routing
form). Also, public access to the recreational resources of the Bay/ront would not be affected by
the proposal.
20. Cultural Resources. YES MAYBE NO
a. Will the proposal resutt in the
alteration of or the destruction
of a prehistoric or historic
archaeological site? lJ lJ .
b. Will the proposal resutt in
adverse physical or aesthetic
effects to a prehistoric or
historic building, structure, or
object? lJ lJ .
c. Does the proposal have the
potential to cause a physical
change which would affect unique
ethnic cultural values? lJ lJ .
d. Will the proposal restrict
existing religious or sacred uses
within the potential impact area? lJ lJ .
Comments:
The National University project would be located in the existing 660 Bay Boulevard building: no
impacts to cuttural resources would occur.
23
I'
/J-~
21.
Mandatory Findings of Significance.
YES MAYBE NO
a.
Does the project have the potential
to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce
the habttat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below sell
sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal
communtty, reduce the number or
restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or
eliminate important examples of
the major periods of California
history or prehistory?
.
o
o
Comments:
Based on the analysis contained in the Initial Study no significant impacts were found to occur to
biological or cultural resources because the National Universtty project would not disturb any part
of the natural environment, nor are there any cullural resources at the project site.
b.
Does the project have the
potential to achieve short-term,
to the disadvantage or long-term,
environmental goals? (A short-
term impact on the environment is
one which occurs in a relatively
brief, definttive period of time
while long-term impacts will
endure well into the future.)
.
o
o
Comments:
The project would implement long-term goals of the Ctty's plans regarding establishment of
necessary facilllies, especially because the existing building is already developed for use, but is
empty. Addttionally, no loss of natural resources which could provide long term environmental
benefits would be affected by this project.
c.
Does the project have impacts
which are individually Iimtted,
but cumulatively considerable?
(A project may impact two or more
separate resou rces where the
impact on each resource is
relatively small, but where the
effect of the total of those
impacts on the environment is
significant.)
o
o
.
24
17
13-33
Comments:
The analysis contained in the Initial Study found no cumulative impacts, and found no individual
impacts.
d.
Does the project have
environmental effects which will
cause substantial adverse effects
on human beings, e~her directly
or indirectly?
CJ
CJ.
.
Comments:
The analysis contained in the In~ial Study found that no direct or indirect adverse effects would
occur to human beings from the National Univers~y project. The issues relevant to this finding
included air qual~y, water, noise, light and glare, land use compatibility, risk of upset,
population/housing, traffic, public services, human heatth, aesthetics, and natural hazards (earth).
25
II
!j~
III. Detennlnation
(To be completed by the Lead Agency. Check one box only.)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
. I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment,
and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
o I find that a~hough the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment.
there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described
on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION WILL BE PREPARED.
o I find the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
0.../; .
7:iJ.-,-~L I
Date
/ 77' ~
b (.<-''tLJ tclca-..d.,,--
Signature
For
CI:: (.1- OUL/ Ct (j. s 'fi<.-
j
26
/1
IJ -5-5-
DE MINIMIS FEE DETERMINATION
(Chapter 1706, Statutes of 1990 - AS 3158)
. It is hereby found that this project involves no potential for any adverse effect, either individually
or cumulatively on wildlffe resources and that a .Certificate of Fee Exemption. shall be prepared
for this project.
o It is hereby found that this project could potentially impact wildlffe, individually or cumulatively and
therefore fee in accordance with Section 711.4 (d) of the Fish and Game Code shall be paid to the
County Clerk.
j;(;----'\!U [-U.Jw.-vdJ ,~
Environmental Review Coordinator
---Trw-vJ...- J I <; 73
I
Date
WPC F \HOME\COMMDEV\642 93
27
:;'0
/ l-]b
KMB Consulting
Traffic Engineenng f Transportation Planning . Impact Studies
.c
n
February 16, 1993
Ms. Diana Richardson
City of Chula Vista
Community Development Department
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
SUBJECT: REVISED TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS FOR PROPOSED NATIONAL
UNIVERSITY PROJECT
Dear Ms. Richardson:
In a previous letter dated December 22, 1992, KMB Consulting presented the results of
study addressing potential traffic impacts associated with the proposed use of
approximately 8,000 square feet of an existing building located at 740 Bay Boulevard by
National University. We understand that National University subsequently withdrew their
application, and that they are now proposing a similar facility at 660 Bay Boulevard in
Chula Vista. The proposed project remains substantially unchanged from the previous
project submittal. Therefore, we have concluded that the National University project
would not result in significant additional traffic generation to the surrounding street
system.
The proposed National University project would involve the operation of a not-for-profit
college level institution within an existing building located at 660 Bay Boulevard in the
City of Chu!a Vista The property is within t'1e coastal zone Current permitted uses for
the site include general industrial and industrial/business park uses, as well as other
specialized uses identified in the Bayfront Specific Plan and Local Coastal Program
(LCP).
The existing building is a traditional multi-tenant office building. Although located within
the general industrial zone which permits various industrial and limited commercial uses,
buildings such as this are typically occupied by non-industrial, "commercial office" uses.
National University proposes to occupy 8,000 square feet of the existing building. The
applicant anticipates operating six to seven classrooms which would each serve an
average of 20 to 25 students, for a total anticipated student population of 150 students.
National University is an institution which primarily serves working adults, so that classes
are generally at night
I J-.:5 ?
.1./
qh(Jh 811~llk"" P<"k -\\ enut:- SUitt' 10:- . SJn DrE'\2n, CA q2131 .16191 689-Jq-i-i . F -\\ {619) 68g-4g9-i
Ms. Diana Richardson
City of Chula Vista
February 16, 1993
Page Two
The proposed project would offer classes between 5:30 p.m. and 10:00 p.m. weekdays,
but would also hold some daytime seminars and academic activities at the site.
Exhibit 1 summarizes expected traffic generation which would result from the National
University project, and compares this traffic generation to trips which would be expected
without the project, assuming the space were occupied by an office use. Assuming that
the average daytime student population is 150 students, or approximately equivalent to
the expected night attendance, universit;' activities would generate approximately 540
daily trips. This is based on the assumption that night classes would generate traffic at
a rate of 2 trips per student (a worst case, assuming that each student is in attendance
and drives alone), and that daytime activities would generate traffic at a rate of 1.6 trips
per student. The rate of 1.6 trips per student is consistent with the average trip
generation rate published by the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) in
the San Dieao Traffic Generators manual for 2-year, junior colleges.
When project traffic generation is compared to trips that would be generated by
commercial office uses, using the average trip generation rates for commercial offices
published by SANDAG, Exhibit 1 shows that the project would result in an increase of
approximately 380 daily trips to the surrounding street system. In the vicinity of the
project, Bay Boulevard, a Class II Collector street, would be most impacted by project.
Bay Boulevard currently carries between 3,400 and 4,100 vehicles per day based on the
most recent daily traffic volume counts for this roadway (1991). These daily volumes are
well within the maximum level of service C daily traffic volume of 12,000 vehicles per day
for Class II Collector streets given in the City of Chula Vista's published Roadway
Capacity Standards. Additional traffic which would result from the proposed project
would represent at most an increase of 9 to 11 percent on Bay Boulevard, and impacts
would be localized. Therefore, project traffic would not constitute a significant addition
to area traffic volumes. During the critical peak hours, the project would result in only
a nominal increase in traffic during the morning peak hour and in approximately 148
additional trips in the afternoon peak hour. It should be noted that the increase in
afternoon peak hour traffic would be in the inbound direction, while existing
industrial/business related uses in the area generate primarily outbound traffic in the
afternoon peak hour. Since morning peak hour project-generated traffic would be
minimal and since afternoon peak hour project traffic would be in the opposite direction
of existing peak traffic flows, the project is not expected to significantly impact area traffic
operations or level of service.
In summary, the proposed National University project would not result in significant
additional traffic generation to the surrounding street system.
.j~
I j7-32
Ms. Diana Richardson
City of Chula Vista
February 16, 1993
Page Three
Please call me if you have any questions, or if you would like additional information.
Sincerely,
KMB CONSULTING
Q/UIL -jJ1 c5~
Kristi M. Berg, P.E.
Attachment
,.2~
(j ~"7 r
( ,) -- ,')1..1
EXHIBIT 1
TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY
NATIONAL UNIVERSITY
Inlenslty
Ave,age Weekday AM Peak (b)
Trip Rat. !n Out
TRIP GENERATION RATES (a)
Use
PM Peak (b)
in Out
Average
Weekday TrID.
TRIP GENERATION
AM Peak
!!! Oul
PM Peak
!!! Oul
Existina Uses (d)
Commercial Office
8,000 SF
20 trips/KSF
12.6% 1.4%
2.6%
10.4%
160
20
2
4
17
Proposed Uses
National University. Night Classes 150 students 2.0 trips/ST (e) N/A N/A 50.0% (e) 0.0% (e) 300 0 0 150 0
National University - Day Classes 150 students 1.6 trips/ST 10.8% 1.2% 2.4% 5.6% 240 26 ~ ..2 13
Subtotol = 540 26 3 156 13
Dlnerence trom Existing = +380 +41 + 1 +152 .4
(a) Source: San Diego Traffic Generators. San Diego Association of Governments. July 1992.
(b) Expressed 8S a percentsgeof daily trips.
(c) Trip generation rates were estimated.
(d) Uses which would be expected to occupy space proposed for National University facility.
-
NOTE: SF = Square Feet; KSF = Thousand Square Feet; ST = Students.
C/>
~~
Q,~
ROUTI NG FORM
DATE: February 12, 1993
,.
TO: Ken Larson, Building & Housing
John Lippitt, Engineering (EIR only)
Cliff Swanson, Engineering (EIR only)
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering (EIR only)
Roger Daoust, Engineering (15/3, EIR/2)
Richard Rudolf.. Assistant City Attorney (EIR only)
Carol Gove, Fire Department
Marty Schmidt, Parks & Recreation
Keith Hawkins, Police Department
Current Planning ~
Frank Herrera, Advance Planning
Bob Sennett, City Landscape Architect
Bob Leiter, Planning Director
Chula Vista Elementary School District, Kate Shurson
Sweetwater Union H.S. District, Tom Silva (IS & EIR)
Maureen Roeber, Library (Final EIR)
Other
FROM: Maryann Miller Environmental Section
SUBJECT: K8J Application for Initial Study (15-93-28 IFA- 615 lOP - 997 )
D Checkprint Draft EIR (20 days)(EIR- IFB- lOP )
0 Review of a Draft EIR (EIR- IFB- lOP )
D Review of Environmental Review Record FC- IERR- )
The project consJsts of: This office building is existing and the project
proposes to use 8,000 sq. ft. for National University
of Classroom and associated office use. 150 expected
students with 7 classrooms.
Location: 660 Bay Boulevard
Please review the document and forward to me any Comments you have by 2/l9/93
Comments: Con~er-P Uu p~
, ~ 1';:417
/
oZ5
/15-1 I
YS-s(or
G. ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT
Case No. I';...q~-2S
1. Ora i naQe
a.
Is the project site within a flood plain? Yt:G.
If so, state which fEMA floodway frequency Boundary ~O~~~~~OklevEK
l1fE 1$/JIL.DtlJ6"PAD I"=' SlIFFIC.fEJ..J71-Y A~ -rJ.+Ei- I - t>IV""y 1
PIZi1-l6r!= TO ~PW "'lInt A:::MA AtJD CoMMUI-!/7Y ST.tWJ::A-Rl>S.
What is the location and description of existing on-site
drainage facilities? <;;;'lJ~--:: ~ ~; 'P.rvltPl/..("'-T'> AM'D-rr> o-,~
5"lvAl.-E J?4J2.A~1 "'"1r> W~c. 1>, .
b.
c.
Are they adequate to serve the project? y~<.
If not, explain briefly. IJ/A
d. What is the location and description of existing off-site
drainage facilities?
e. Are they adequate to serve the project? y~~.
If not, explain briefly. f{/4
2. TransDortation
a. What roads provide primary access to the project? BAy' BotJL-EVAI<.D
ANn ",}" ~TQFE"r
b. What is the estimated number of one-way auto trips to be
generated by the project (per day)? 3t",P, A1:>T eVER FXt~lJ,c; t~.
c.
What is the ADT and estimated
project completion?
Before
A.D. T. BAy l3ouU=:v'AI!J:>_ '12'10
"s" tGT1l.Ft::='r - 73,20
l.O.S. &\.y !XxJt.aI~ -/-OS ';<\"
"J'"'" <;..,.-o&~ - LO<;; '~ "
level of service before and after
After
<!-e,SP>
7b1'JA
LocIt"A"
L-oS '~II
If the A.D.T. or l.O.S. is unknown or not applicable, explain
briefly. N/A
,
d. Are the primary access roads adequate to serve the project? If
not, explain briefly. YE5.
WPC 9459P
-14-
ID - 4~
.,2b
Y5 -56 {
e.
Are there any intersections at or near
result in an unacceptable Level of Service
If so, identify: Location IJ/A
Cumulative L.a.S. ^(1-4 .
Case No. TS-4'3-2B
the pOint that will
(LOS)? 1-10.
f.
AIJ 11V:<Evo~ OF~ OF ~C>Ic:.A""'t ..J
Is there any dedication required? MAY lSE. =-.qcJtREX>. ". 0
If so, please specify. B4.Y' I'Y> v <v...5'Ts t:Eo<;(~TI<'h Ac, A (') '~,c, rr ColA..Ec:noR..
h'1'TU 'R(Ja:'W~y~ 11-1 T'TJE ~~E:.12AL FLAil. s..,1=1=",c,~....,r 't::El:>ICA..'T~rvJ I-1I'tY Sj ~/~
~ M{;:Er WE fl4i.F-Wt1::JrH ~AJ./QI,.IU:6 OF s..m r>eSIH.l~rt~
Is there any street widening required? f.ln,
If so, please specify. ^>IA .
g.
h. Are there any other street improvements required? Afo.
If so, please specify the general nature of the necessary
improvements. ^{/A
3. Soils /'IA. EXI'STIN6 13UII-[)IN{i. NO NEi./ Co^l571<UC.TlbI-.1 /<;,. F'RofOSEb.
a. Are there any anticipated adverse geotechnical conditions on the
project sHe?
b. If yes, specify these conditions.
c. Is a soils report necess~ry?
4.
Land Form
c..l'?APED z%
a. What is the average Ritural slope of the sHe?
b. What is the al<!A~ slope of the sHe? So % ( Pv'E~TFI2L--Y 5LoPE) .
maximum Ritura
Noise
5.
Are there any traffic-related noise levels impacting the site that
are significant enough to justify that a noise analysis be required
of the applicant? No.
6. Waste Generation
How much solid and liquid
proposed project per day?
J-/o CIti4tv~ IN Sl>L.ID
SO 1 i d WA sn;. 6F.<JF.PAnwJ
(sewage) waste wi 11 be generated by the
. . 'fZ5 GAt.l.ct<L<>/p",y (I.b EDU) DVE;/:?
L lOUld Ex'';:;T-''.,[~ ~w~'" f.,o;;NEt2A-r'D<J
What is the location and size of existing. sewer lines on or
downstream from the sHe? 2./" (arr~ETE 'PI~ Al.oo-s6 WFc;rFf<LV PrZoPl"Qry
U/oJE: k/+f Ieii' "P1<;t-:I-fMlf-F4 -r;') 7Zk MF-n:?b 5I"WF.i2 -=WNST-I2I:A'-1.
,
Are they adequate to serve the proposed project? YE:S.
WPC g';Sgp
J
(,) --1.::; -15-
~7
YS-5fo!
Case No. IS -"!"3-2g,
7 . Rema rks
Pl ease identify and di scuss any rem a 1 mng potent ia 1 adverse impacts,
mitigation measures, or other issues.
['
"-
eer or Representative
~/f{olq3
Date '
City
\
,.,2..i
IIPe 9459P
-15-
I g -44'
Case No. --Ts-7'.?-~
H-I. PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
1. Is project su 'ect to Parks & Recreation Threshold requirements?
If not, please xplain.
Neighborhood
Community Parks
To meet City requ i remeo-r(' wi 11
are necessary to serve
2. How many acres of
project?
3. Are existing neighborhoo
adequate to serve the popula
Neighborhood
Community Parks
4. If not, are parkland dedications
of the project adequate
community parks
increase r~ 9
proposed
near the project
from this project?
as part
5.
Provide land?
Pay a fee?
6. Remarks:
~~ ~~I
Parks'and Recreation Director or Representative
-:2 -l1 . f ~
Date
~1
\,IPC 04J3p/9~59P
/3 -L/'.:>
-13-
~Pfil~il~lH!~r!~llil.~ffin~i
...go
\ D - tb
ROUTI NG FORM
DATE: February 12, 1993
,.
TO:
'"..1.1
Ken Larson, Building & Housing
John Lippitt, Engineering (EIR only)
Cliff Swanson, Engi~~ering (EIR only)
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering (EIR only)
Roger Daoust, Engineering (1513, EIR/2)
Richard Rudolf, Assistant City Attorney (EIR only)
Carol Gove, Fire Department
Marty Schmidt, Parks & Recreation
Keith Hawkins, Police Department
Current Planning
Frank Herrera, Advance Planning
Bob Sennett, City landscape Architect
Bob Leiter, Pl ann i ng Di rector
Chu1a Vista Elementary School District, Kate Shurson
Sweetwater Union H.S. District, Tom Silva (IS & EIR)
Maureen Roeber, Library (Final EIR)
Other
FROM: Ma ryann Mi 11 er Environmental Section
SUBJECT: m Application for Initial Study (15- 93-28 IFA- 615 IDP - 997 )
D Checkprint Draft EIR (20 days)(EIR- IFB- IDP )
0 Review of a Draft EIR (EIR- IFB- lOP )
D Review of Environmental Review Record FC- IERR- )
The project consJsts of:
This office buildin9 is existin9 and the project
proposes to use 8,000 sq. ft. for National University
of Classroom and associated office use. 150 expected
students wi~h 7 classrooms.
Location:
660 Bay Boulevard
Please review the document and forward to me any comments you have by 2/19/93
Comments:
/ ~~~S
~ \~. ~)
{jl .~ "-77
rJe==> ~~'.3/
Case No. --75:-9/-,.:) P
H. FIRE DEPARTMENT
1. What is the distance to the nearest fire station? AnQ what is the
Fire Department's estimated reaction time?
.:5_;t'f ~M':"; .
2. Will the Fire Department be able to provide an adequate level of fire
protection for the roposed facility without an increase in equipment
or personnel? S
3.
Remarks
All!
W/'?H&v/5
4"7
7%d
,-
+,-...,c
/i4 tv /~
F e Marshal
c?-//{,/c; 3
Date
.32-
\oIPC 0413p/9459P
-12- (~-~y
BOARD OF EOUCA TION
JOSE;::>...:::J CUM~~:~,GS, Ptl.D.
lAR;:1y cUrm:~;GMAM
Si"!I,~O:~ GILES
PATR:CK A J~.;2;;:J
GREG R SA~;:JOVA:"
SUPERINTENDENT
J(lt-!r; F, VUGRIN. PhD
CHULA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOUL DISTRICT
84 EAST "J" STREET' CHeL.... VISTA, CALIFORKIA 91910 . 619425.%00
EACH CHILD !S A.'1 INDI\'IDUAL OF GREAT WORT! [
February 23, 1993
Ms. Maryann Miller
Environmental Review Coordinator
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
MAR J 1
19a-
,)
o
. ~,
RE IS-93-28/ FA-615 / DP-997
Location 660 Bay Blvd.
Project National University (In existing bldg.)
Dear Ms. Miller
Thank you for the opportunity to review and comment on the Notice of Initial
Study for the National University School project referenced above.
Since It appears no new construction is involved, no school fees are required.
Should this situation change, school fees for commercial development would
be due The current fee of $.27/square foot is distributed as follows: $.12 for
Chula Vista Elementary School District, $.15 for Sweetwater Union High
School District
Even though no fees appear to be necessary, the District is still required to
sign off on the Certificate of Compliance.
~. sL.. I
~atJ Shurson
Director of Planning & Facilities
KSdp
m4l.'l fij~:l,~ I'"J, ~ n,,,-,-'l1lf~~
I/{ --17
d3
gJ!9g~!Y~~iml!~~~t!~!
(3 - ~ ()
sf
ROUTING FORM
r:' r=-
IifJ;;;.CEIVED
FEB 1 7 l!lYj
PlANNING Dt:p..r.
DATE: February 12. 1993
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT: ~
D
o
D
,.
Ken Larson, Building & Housing
John Lippitt, Engineering (EIR only)
Cliff Swanson, Engineering (EIR only)
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering (EIR only)
Roger Daoust, Engineering (IS/3, EIR/2)
Richard Rudolf, Assistant City Attorney (EIR only)
Carol Gove, Fire Department
Marty Schmidt, Parks & Recreation
Keith Hawkins, Police Department
Current Planning
Frank Herrera, Advance Planning
Bob Sennett, City Landscape Architect
Bob Leiter, Planning Dirl1ctor
Chula Vista Elementary School District, Kate Shurson
~Sweetwater Union H.S. District, Tom Silva (IS & EIR)
Maureen Roeber, Library (Final EIR)
Other
.J
Maryann Miller
Environmental Section
Application for Initial Study (IS-93-28 /FA- 615 IDP - 997 )
Checkprint Draft EIR (20 days}(EIR- IFB- IDP )
Review of a Draft EIR (EIR- IFB- lOP )
Review of Environmental Review Record FC- IERR- }
The project consists of:
Location:
This office building is existing and the project
proposes to use 8,000 sq. ft. for National University
of Classroom and associated office use. 150 expected
students wi~h 7 classrooms.
660 Bay Boulevard
Please review the document and forward to me any comments you have by 2/19/93
Corranents:
See A-ttachec!!
"
.
] f
(J -S-
..E.5
~Pf.:lg~m!~!<<ffiMYYliiJ!g@~1
I '&~' ')-J-
,3,
REQUEST FOR COMMENTS
Chula Vista Planning Department
itECEIVED ~/rj)
FfB 0 j l~,.)
PLANNING DEPT.
DATE: February 2, 1993
TO:
x
X
X
X
X
Graphics
Fire Marshal
Building & Housing
Advance Planning
Engineering/Land Development Div.
X Landscape Architect
X Env. Review Coordinator
X Chula Vista School Dist.
X Sweetwater Union H.S.Dist.
X Ken Lee "(liotice only)
X Police Dept.
FROM: Martin Miller
Planning Department
(Current Planning)
pcc- 93-26
P-
ZAV-
PCZ-
PCM-
PUD-
PCA-
GPA-
Conditional Use Permit
Project Name National University
Precise Plan
Variance
Location 660 Bav Blvd.
Zone Change
Miscellaneous
Request To establish an educational
facilitv in the "I" (Industrial)
Planned Unit Development
Zoning Text Amendment
General Plan Amendment
zone
Other
Deposit Account Number DP- 994
Planning Commission Meeting Date March 24, 1993
Zoning Administrator Hearing Date February 12, 1993
Comments to be received by:
COMMENTS:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
p'-~c'.4~ <::7/$;7;"-' :s"/;JZ~/C7YKt::.- ~,ur %;.....,,/'7 ~nILd.:J) ) H'C.
/. " .,' / /.
,r/E7<./ 4-:75E~~.rec /!;ee71 /:!;> ~'h.y"l c./Z(;'7'>-;-;r];)" ,)--/c /~r#e ~:..
b-' /7#0,IJi.: '~7/~~ IF ~7,r t9Jh7>.<.5 c,,",,;/,..;.<</~~
::t'M:t,:. ffft- /n/7 A; /29",;.=/,,;r ptr 7/;"'/", CF P4"~o/":"-'7 ~'-",<A, /
IJ- >~ .J7
/.:?-s>t-,~/cC-
/
'f!!iflt9g~W!~'f!ffijJi911j~fl!!i19!i~!
16-54-
J!
APPLICATION CANNOT BE ACCEPTED UNLESS SITE PLAN
IS FOLDED TO FIT INTO AN 8-1/2 X 11 FOLDER
FOR OFFICE USE
INITIAL STUDY
Case No. T, 7'.'.:: c~//('
Depos it 7(\,1 - ()/ 977
Receipt No. //1/c'//
Date Rec'd ~-'-//. 9-<'
Accepted by , ~
Project No. c>)/.-/~:;
A. BACKGROUND
City of Chula Vista
Application Form
1. PROJECT TITLE 660 Bay Boulevard
2. PROJECT LOCATION (Street address or description)
660 Bay Boulevard, Chula Vista, CA 91910
Assessors Book, Page &. Parcel No. 571-330-20-00
3. BRIEF PROJECT DESCRIPTION This office building is existinq and_the projec
proposes to use 8000 square feet for National University of classroorr
and'associated office use. 150 expected students with 7 classrooms.
4. Name of Appl icant Foster Properties
Address 740 Bav Boulevard. Suite 200 Phone 427-1900
City Chula Vista State CA Zip 91910
5. Name of Preparer/Agent The Greenwald Company
Address 740 Bay Boulevard, Suite 200 Phone427-1900
City Chula Vista State CA Zip 91910
Relation to Applicant P~rtnershiD
6. Indicate all permits or approvals and enclosures or documents
required by the Environmental Review Coordinator.
a. Permits or approvals required:
--- General Plan Amendment ___ Design Review Application ___ Public Project
--- Rezone/Prezone ___ Tentative Subd. Hap ___ Annexation
--- Precise Plan ___ Grading Permit ___ Redevelopment Agency
--- Specific Plan ___ Tentative Parcel Hap ___ O.P.A. .
-X- Condo Use Permit Site Plan &. Arch.Review ___ Redevelopment Agency
Variance Project Area Co~~ittee D.D.A.
-X- Coastal Development Use Permit .1L Other LCP
Permit
b. Enclosures or documents (as required by the Environmental Review
Coordinator).
GradinQ Plan
;,: Parcel-Hap
___ Precise Plan
___ Specific Plan
Other Aaency Permit
or App~ovals Required
___ Arch. Elevations ___ Hydrological Study
--- Landscape Plans ___ Biological Study
Tentative Subd. Hap ___ Archaeological Survey ~C7
Improvement Plans Noise Assessment ~ I
~ Soils Report === Traffic Impact Report
Hazardous lias te (j" . (/ ,'-___Other
Assessment ~.~
8. PROPOSED PROJECT
b. Does the project involve the construction of new buildings, or
will existing structures be utilized? existing <:t-rll,..t-llr", 1lr; 1 iZed
2. Complete this section if project is residential.
a. Type development: Single family Two family
Multi family Townhouse Condominium
b. Total number of structures
c. Maximum height of structures
d. Number of Units: 1 bedroom 2 bedrooms
3 bedrooms 4 bedrooms Total units
e. Gross density (oU/total acres)
f. Net density (oU/total acres minus any dedication)
g. Estimated project population
h. Estimated sale or rental price range
i. Square footage of structure
j. Percent of lot coverage by buildings or structures
k. Number of on.site parking spaces to be provided
1. Percent of site in road and paved surface
3. Complete this section if project is commercial or industrial or mixed
use.
1.
a.
land Area: sq. footage 78,606
If land area to be dedicated, state
or acreage I. 73
acreage and purpose.
a.
Type(s) of land use
Floor area 34,452
Type of construction
-FQct-
Tnnllc:::.tri;:!l nffi,...Q 'J:l,1ilr1;1"'\:;
b.
Height of structure(s) ?R
used in the structure r,..n,..r'Wtg
c.
d.
Describe major access
orientation to adjoining
Site Plan Number (2)
points to the structures and the
properties and streets See attached
Two for ecrrp~~ ~nn ;nqrp~~
e.
Number of on.site parking spaces provided RS
Estimated number of employees per shift 28 , Number of
shifts one Total 28
Estimated number of customers (per day) and basis of estimate ___
159.students per day
Estimated nu~ber of deliveries per day 5
/3-)l;~
1ft>
f.
g.
h.
i. Estimated range of service area and basis of estimate
South Bay Region
j. Type/extent of operations not in enclosed buildings n/a
k. Hours of operation 8:00 a.m to 10:00 ~.m daily
1. Type of exterior lighting hi<;rh Sndi\lm 14 ff pn1p pvtprinr
4. If project is other than residential, commercial or industrial
complete this section.
a. Type of project
b. Type of facilities provided
c. Square feet of enclosed structures
d. Height of structure(s) - maximum
e. Ultimate occupancy load of project
f. Number of on-site parking spaces to be provided
g. Square feet of road and paved surfaces
h. Additional project characteristics
C. PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS
I. If the project could result in the direct emission of any air
pollutants, (hydrocarbons, sulfur, dust, etc.) identify them."
NONE
2. Is any type of grading or excavation of the property anticipated No
(If yes, complete the following:)
a. Excluding trenches to be backfilled, how many cubic yards of
earth will be excavated?
b. How many cubic yards of fill will be placed?
c. How much area (sq. ft. or acres) will be graded?
d.
What will be the - Maximum depth of cut
Average depth of cut
Maximum depth of fill
Average depth of fill
I g - SF;"
Jfl
.
3. 11111 there be any noise generated from the proposed project site or
from points of access which may impact the surrounding or adjacent
land uses? No
4. Descri be all energy consumi ng devi ces wh I ch are part of the proposed
project and the type of energy used (air conditioning, electrical
appliance, heating equipment, etc.) Existinq HVAC packaqe .units
5. Indicate the amount of natural open space that is part of the project
(sq. ft. or acres) aDDroximately 200 square feet of qarden
court yard.
6. If the project will result in any employment opportunities describe
the nature and type of these jobs. 16 faculty, 8 clerical., 4 "janitorial
~ ("",....mp11+- ~r
7.
Will highly
substances
site? NO
fl ammab 1 e
be used
or potentially
or stored
explosive
with i n
materials or
the project
8. How many estimated automobile trips, per day, will be generated by
the project? 432 automobile trips per day, 150 students X 2,
16 faculty X 2, and 50 qeneral employees X 2.
9. Describe (if any) off-site improvements necessary to implement the
proj ect, and the i r po i nts of acces s or connect i on to the project
site. Improvements include but not 1 imited to the following: new
streets; street widening; extension of gas, electric, and sewer
lines; cut and fill slopes; and pedestrian and bicycle facilities.
'f\J()T1P
D. DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING
1. Geoloov
Has a geology study been conducted on the property? No
(If yes, please attach)
Has a Soils Report on the project site been made? Y"''''. "''''0 ott~"hgd
(If yes, please attach)
2. Hvdrolooy
Are any of the foll owing features present on or adjacent to the
site? No (If yes, please explain in detail.)
a.
Is there any surface evidence of a
table? subsnrfnr.p. \.o..'.:=!rp'r nhc::prvpr! ~+-
shallow ground
In f~At-
water
b.
Are there any watercourses or drainage improvements on or Ll~
adjacent to the site? No ir
\.Ipe 0413n/9~'QP
10 -5Y
- ,
c. Does runoff from the project site drain directly into or to~ard'
a domestic ~ater supply, lake, reservoir or bay?
N('")
d. Could drainage from the site cause erosion or siltation to
adjacent areas? NO
e.
Describe
location.
all drainage facilities ,to, ~e provided
existing drainage fac~l~t~es
and
their
3. Noise
a. Are there any noise sources in the project vicinity which may
impact the project site? NO
4. Bioloqy
a. Is the project site in a natural or partially natural state?
This is an existing project
b. If yes, has a biological survey been conducted on the property?
Yes
No _____ (Please attach a copy).
c. Describe all trees and vegetation on the site. Indicate
location, height, diameter, and species of trees, and which (if
any) will be removed by the project. During construction, site
was completely graded and reveqetated with lawn and trees
for parking and access areas.
5. Past Use of the land
a.
Are there any known historical or
located on or near the project site?
archeological
NO
resources
b.
Are there any known paleontological resources?
NO
c. Have there been any hazardous materials disposed of or stored on
or near the project site? NO
d.
What was the land previously used for? Ncr
Vacant Land
13
yC;
/J
liPe 0413p/9459P
. ~,-
6. Current lo1d Use
a. Describe all structures and land uses currently existing on the
project site. Industrial office buildinq
b. Describe all structures and land uses currently existing on
adjacent property.
North
Office/Warehouse Building
South
Entrance to cnUl.a v ~S't.d l'~ldL Iud.
East
Vacant Land and Hiqhwav 5
West
Warehouse Buildinq
7. Social
a. Are there any residents on site? (If so, how many?) No
b. Are there any current employment opportunities on site? (If so,
how many and what type?) NO
8. Please provide any other information which may assist in the
evaluation of the proposed project.
f 6-[;0
11/
IIPe 0413p/9459P
-6-
E. CERTIFICATION
I I
or
Owner/owner in escrow*
r'J1 f
HEREBY AFFIRM, that to the best of my bel ief, the statements and information
herein contained are in all respects true and correct and that all known
information concerning the project and its setting has been included in this
application for an Initial Study of possible environmental impact and any
enclosures for attachments thereto.
'DATE:
:;2-/0-93
*If acting for a corporatjon, include capacity and company name.
It -.6 I
4S
SITE PLAN CONTENTS
660 BAY BOULEVARD
1. 660 Bay Boulevard, Chula Vista, California 91910
2. Parcell of Parcel Map No. 13581 in the city of Chula Vista,
County of San Diego, State of California, as filed in the
office of the County Recorder of said San Diego County,
December 6, 1984 as File no. 84-455741 of Official Records.
3. 571-330-20-00
4. Foster Properties, 740 Bay Boulevard, suite 200, Chula Vista,
California, 91910
5. The Greenwald Company, Agent, 740 Bay Boulevard, suite 200,
Chula Vista, California 91910
6. See site plan
7.
Existing building dimensions:
Concrete Structure
Height 28 feet
8.
Existing adjacent structures:
630 Bay Boulevard
9. Industrial/Office Space
10. 34,452 square feet
11. See site plan
12. Existing chain link fence along west side of property 6 feet
in height.
13. See site plan
14. Existing landscaping to remain the same.
15. None
16 thru 21.
See site plan
I S ~ b~
tf~
.
REPORT OF FIELD DENSITY TESTING
Trench Backfill, Su!"lgrade and B~se Testing
P"rcel 1, M"rina Gatew~y Project
Northwest of Bay Boulev"rd & "J" Street
Chura Vist~, California
JOB NO. 87...!l921
05 Fe!"lruary 1988
(J-G3
47
~~~o
.J8.lg~Uil~~Mg~lm~!9~~
I $~G 4-
1f
d~~D
GEOTECHNICAL EXPLuRATION, INC.
SOIL &. FOUNDATION ENGINEERING
GROUNDWATER' GEOPHYSICS' ENGINEERING GEOLOGY
.
05 Fehruary 1988
Mr. Mike McDonald
GREENWALD-McDONALD
2635 Camino del Rio South. #309
San Diego. CA 92108
Job No. 87-11921
Suhject: Report of Field Density Testinq
Trench Backfill. Suhgrade and Base Testing
Parcel 1. Marina Gateway Project
Northwest Corner of Bay Boulevi'rd and "J" Street
Chula Vista. Californi"
Dear Mr. McDon"ld:
In accordance with your request. Geotechnical Exploration, Inc.. herehy
suhmits the follow ing report summarizing our work and test results. "s
well as our conclusions "nd recommendations concerning the suhject
tested the
A representative of our
trench hackfill soils
firm periodically visited the site and
project.
that
were placed and comp"cted in
also tested the finished subgrade
different areas at the suhject site, and
and base in the park ing areaS of the site.
The field density testing was performed between Septemher 2. 1987. and
January 25, 1988.
SCOPE OF WOR K
The scope of work 'of our services included:
1. Periodic field density testing of hackfill pl;tcement in storm dr;tins.
utility trenches, sewer, and water lines. No continuous
observations were provided during the hackfilling oper"tion.
()-b5
#9
..,.,...,,-, T,",^",r r-r......rrT ~ C'!'."I '"):rrr\ "^I trf""'\r."II^ (i'll'll... IJ..,'()\ c,,1(') 7"')""""
Marin1l Gatewi!Y Project, Parcel
Chula Vista, California
Joh No. 87-4921
Page 2
.
2. Performing field density tests in the placed and compacted suhgrade
and base material. No continuous ohservations were provided
during preparation of the .suhgrade or hase for the areas to he
paved. Field density tests were performed on finish suhgr1lde or
base.
3. Performing lahoratory tests on representative samples of the fill
material to determine the lahoratory maximum dry density of the fill
or hase material.
4. Providing professional conclusions and recommend"tions reg"rding
the test results.
GENERAL SITE INFORMATION
The entire property, consisting of approxim1ltely 4.3 1lcres, is located
west of Bay Boulevard, hetween "I" and "J" Streets, in the City of Chula
Vista. The property is horde red on the north hy a developed property,
on the south hy "J" Street, on the east hy Bay Boulevard, and on the
west by a railroad tr1lck belonging to San Diego and Arizona E1lstern
Railroad.
Prior to this testing operation, the property had heen mass-graded under
our ohservations and testing, as descrlhed in our report dated July 23,
1987 (Joh No. 87-4921l. Herein we report the results ohtained in our field
density testing of trench hack fill and finish suhgrade and hase material of
park ing areas.
At the time of our last site visit on January 25, 1988, the only soil-related
work pending inside the property was the completion of paving of a
portion of the driveway separating the northern huilding and the southern
buildings.
I~ /6G
.s~
c~~o
Mnrina Cnteway Project, Parcell
Chula Vista, Cnlifornia
Joh No. 87-4921
Page 3
I
FIELD TESTING
Periodic field density tests were provided hy a representative of
Geotechnical Exploration, Inc. to check the grading contractor's
compliance with the applicahle drawings and joh specifications. The
periodic presence of our field representntive at the site was to provide to
the contractor a continuing source of professional advice, opinions, and
recommendations hased upon the field representative's ohservations of
the contractor's work, and did not include any superintending,
supervision, or direction of the nctual work of the contractor or the
contractor's workers. Our periodic visits were mnde on request of the
contractor's representative (Mr. Chuck Alhright for Collins
Constructionl. Since our visits were periodic,,1 and we did not
continuously observe the grading procedures, we only report the field
density test results ohtained at the specific test loc"tions.
The testing operation performed in the following genernl m"nner:
1. The soils encountered in the testing operation were from on-site and
imported sources, and consisted primarily of t>rown, silty s"nd with
clay; dark brown, sandy clay; tan, silty fine sand; hrown; silty,
fine to medium sand; light gray, fine to medium sand; brown, silty
sand with clay; red-brown, fine to medium sand; gray-hrown,
medium to coarse sand with gravel; and gray-hrown, fine to coarse
sand with rock.
2. Fill materials were tested and found to he compacted to at least 90
percent of Maximum Dry Density. Areas with failing test results
were reworked and/or ;odditional compaction effort was provided
until acceptahle results were ohtained. Soft or saturated spots on
the subgrade were indicated to the contractor for correction prior to
( ~(:1
I -'
51
C[fU;1~o
Milrina GateWAY P~ct, Parcell
Chula Vista, Cali"- ..iil
Joh No. 87-4921
Page 4
hase placement. No ohservation WilS provided to verify that
corrections had heen made, since hAse material WilS already placed
at the time of our field techniciiln's last site visit. The contractor
indicated that they W ill fix any damage occurring to pilvement within
the first year after placement.
Field density tests taken on hase material indicilted compaction
degrees not lower than 95 percent relative compaction.
3. Field density tests were taken at the approximately locations show n
in the Plot PI"n (Figure No. Il, and at the approximilte depths
indicated in the list of test results (Figure No. I I J.
TESTS
Field density tests were performed in accordance with A.S. T .1.4. 0-1556.
Milximum density determinations were performed in accord;mce with
A.S.T.M. 0-1557, Method A (and Method C for hase milterial). The
reli'tive compaction results, as summilrized on Figure No. /I. are the
ratios of the field densities to the 'ilhoratory Maximum Dry Densities,
expressed as percentages.
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
The following conclusions and recommendations are hased upon our
analysis of all the data available from the testing of the soils compacted on
this site.
General Testinq
1. The soils utilized in the grading operation were from existing on-site
soils which were replaced and recompacted, and imported materiills
which were placed and recompacted. The soils primarily consisted
of hrown, silty sand with clay; dark brown, sandy clay; hrown,
I q/bY
.5)-
CUU1~D
Marina Gateway Pr'. ct, Parcell
Chula Vista, Califo ,a
Joh No. 87-4921
P"ge 5
.
silty sand with clay; tan, silty fine s"nd; brown, silty, fine to
medium sand; light gray, fine to medium sand; gr/ly-brown, medium
to coarse s"nd with gravel; "nd gr"y-hrown, fine to COi'rse si'nd
with rock.
2. During the testing operation, the hackfill soils were found to he
cClmpacted, at the specific test loc"tions, to at least 90 percent
relative comp"ction. When failing test results were ohtained,
rework or addition"l compaction of the f"iling "rea was recommended
until s"tisfactory results were ohtained. Field density tests were
also taken in the suhgrade and hase material after the soil or hase
material had been placed and compacted. Density test results Cln
subgrade or hase material at the specific test location indicated
compaction degrees no lower than 95 percent relative compaction.
Areas of soft or saturated soils ohserved in the suhgrade were
pointed out to the contr"ctor for correction prior to !'>"se placement.
No verification of corrections could he made hy our field technician
since h"se material was already placed at the time of his following
visit to the site.
No continuous ohservations of the compaction procedure were
provided by the representative of our firm during compaction of
trench hackfill or subgrade and hase preparation. Only field
density and laboratory test results are presented herein.
3. All recommendations presented In our previous reports for this site
rem"in applicahle unless superseded in writing.
SUMMARY
Based on our experience, it is our opinion that the testing operation
described herein, in general, was performed in conformance with the
currently accepted standard of practice in the field of geotechnical
engineering. It is to he understood that our test results and opinion of
53
(6 - fie;
~~~D
IJULf\JL5""UO
Marina Gateway Project, Parcel
Chula Vist<l, California
I
Joh No. 87-4921
Page 6
the field density testing general acceptance do not guarantee that every
cuhic Y<lrd of compacted fill has neen compacted to specification since not
every cubic yard has I:>een ohserved or tested, Our test results indicate
the measured comp<lction degree ohtained at the specific test location. We
can only guarantee that our tests have heen made in accordance with the
care and current profession..1 standards in our field.
The testing described herein was performed hetween Septemher 2, 1987,
and January 25, 1988.
All statements in the report are applicahle only for the testing operation
performed by our firm. The firm of Geotechnical Exploration, Inc. shall
not he held responsible for fill soils placed without our observations and
testing at any other time, or subsequent changes to the site hy others,
which directly or indirectly cause poor surface or suhsurface dri>inage,
water erosion, and/or alteration of the strength of the compacted fill
soils.
In the event that any changes in the nature, design, or location. of the
huildings or improvements are planned, the conclusions and recommen-
dations contained in this report shall not he considered valid unless the
changes are reviewed and conclusIons of this report modified or verified
in writing.
Professional opinions presented herein have heen made hased on our tests
and experience, and they have heen made in accordance with generally
accepted current geotechnical engineering principles and practices. This
warranty is in lieu of all other warranties, either expressed or implied,
t l-7CJ
5'1
Q~~D
Marina Gateway Project, Parcel 1
Chula Vista, California
Jot-. No, 87-4921
Page 7
I
Thank you for this opportunity to he of service. Should any Questions
arise concerning this report, please do not hesitate to contact us.
Reference to our Job No. 17-4921 will help to expedite a reply to your
inquiries.
Respectfully suhmitted,
GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION. INC.
~!fi~
Jaime A. Cerros
Project Engineer/R.C.E. 34422
&atESSiQ,),~~
P'~ ~~:y( ~
? 0~' / ~;\- A. C[/?'\......... (~~\
.' J...:. .I""'" -r....:.\ v;. ',\
IV,!~ 0.0-. \
,- -. V'I..
\1::;:; \ No OJ2007 );;. 1
0:: Evn 9'~~/ 1] / J
\ ". \ ',. -'u. /,
~...... ~\~... :','
~ ,....,n.. ,_, ....,'.(~ " /
~~ ....J />-':;":..:-. _ :',' -.,'
. <. C' - " ,".\ \. ,/
~ -,- L',,-' ,
......;.::,.... -_.....-;,.'...'
---.:.:.---.......-
JAC/pj/170
Enclosures
cc: Addressee (4)
Collins General Contractors (2)
IS Ii
S-s
~UD=;J~o
Compaction Test Results
. Depth Moisture Field Soil Relative
Test Date location Fill 0.'0 Density Type Compaction
SEIlER TRENCH TESTS
SI 7/2/87 Building A -0.5' 9.4 114 pef I 92%
S2 7/2/87 Building A -1.0 ' 12.4 115 pef I . 93%
S3 7/2/87 Bldg. A auxilIary -2.0' 8.7 112 pef I 90%
S4 11110/87 Building B 2.0' 8.2 129 pef VI 96%
S5 11110/87 Buil di ng B 3.0' 11.7 122 pef VI 92%
S6 11/11/87 Building B -2.0' 17.6 105 pef V 91%
S7 11/11/87 8uilding B -2.0' 21.2 115pcf II 93%
S8 11/12/87 Building B F.G. 15.6 111 pef 11 89%
S9 11/12/87 Building B F.G. 17.6 114 pef II 92%
S10 11/12/87 Buildin9 B F.G. 15.6 114 pef II 92%
STORM ORAIN TRENCH TESTS
SOl 10127/87 410+BO Bay
Blvd. crossing 4.0' 7.0 11 1 pc f V 97%
S02 10/29/87 Parallel to J St. 1.0 ' 4.5 104 pef V 95%
S03 10/29/87 Parallel to J St. 2.0' 14.5 121 pef II 97%
S04 10/29/87 Parallel to J St. 4.0' 15.2 120 pef II 97%
S05 11/4/87 410+BO Bay
Blvd. erossin9 2.0' 7.0 124 pef VI 93%
S06 11/4/87 410+80 Bay
Blvd. crossing 4.0' 8.9 131 pef VI 98%
S07 11112/87 410+80 Bay
Blvd. crossing 2.0' 10.0 117 pcf IV 93%
S08 11/16/87 410+BO ,Bay
Blvd. crossing F.G. 9.9 . 116 pcf VII 96%
S09 11116/87 Bay Blvd.
box a rea 6.0'/FG 9.3 113 pcf II 91%
CONTI NUED
a~~~~
I p-l~
Job No. 87-4921
Fi9ure No. II.
~k
Compaction Test Results
Depth Moisture Field Soil Relative
Test Date Location Fill ".'0 Density Type Compaction
WATER TRENCH TESTS
WI 10/27/87 SW side of
parking area 2.5' 7.0 III pef I . 89% FAIL
W2 10/27/87 SW side of
parking area 2.5' 13.0 114 pef II 92%
W3 10/27/87 N side of
parking area 2.5' 13. I 112 pef II 90%
W4 10/27/87 N side of
park.ing area 2.5' 12.7 119 pef II 96%
W5 10/27/87 retest WI 2.5' 8.0 116 pef I 94%
JOINT TRENCH TESTS
Jl 11/23/87 Parking between
81d9SA&B 2.5' 8.5 112 pef III 90%
J2 11/23/87 Parking between
Bl dgs A & B 2.5' 10.0 114 pet III 92%
J3 11/23/B7 Parking between
BldgsA&B 2.5' 10.5 113 pef III 91%
J4 11/23/B7 Parkin9 west of
Bldg. A 2.5' 11.5 117 pef III 94%
J5 11/23/B7 Parking between
BldgsA&B 5.0 ' 10.9 113 pef III 91%
J6 11/23/87 Parking west of
Bldg. A 5.0' 8.3 113 pef III 91%
J7 11/23/87 Parking west of
Bldg. A 3.0' 10.5 115 pef III 93%
J8 11/23/87 Parkin9 west of --
Bldg. A 3.0' 10.5 113 pef III 91%
J9 11/23/B7 E. of Bldg. A 2.0' g.o 112 pef III 90%
JI0 11/23/87 E. of Bldg. A 2.0' 10.0 112 pef III 90%
J11 11/23/87 E. of Bldg. A 2.0' 11.0 113 pef III 91%
I CONTI NUED
a[iU;J~J
i~'7;S
Job No. B7-4921
Figure No. lIb
51
Compaction Test Results
. Depth Moisture Field Soil Relative
Test Date Location Fill 0.'0 Density Type Compaction
SUBGRAIlE AND BASE TESTS
B1 1/12/88 see plot plan S.G. 13.6 123 pcf III 99%
B2 1/12/88 see plot plan S.G. 14.2 120 pef III 97%
B3 1/12/88 see plot plan S.G. 9.4 113 pef V 98%
84 1/14/88 see plot plan Base 6.4 141 pef VIII 97%
B5 1/14/88 see plot plan Base 5.7 142 pef VIII 98%
86 1/14/88 see plot plan Base 6.2 143 pef VIII 99%
B7 1/14/88 see plot plan Base 5.5 140 pef VIII 96%
88 1/14/88 see plot plan Base 6.7 141 pef VIII 97%
B9 1/21/88 see plot plan S.G. 15.6 121 pef III 98%
B10 1/21/88 see plot plan S.G. 16.3 120 pef II 97%
BlI 1/21/88 see plot plan S.G. 8.1 119 pef III 96%
BI2 1/21188 see plot plan S.G. 11.1 121 pef III 96%
B13 1/22/88 see plot plan. S.G. .11.1 120 pef I 97%
B14 1/22/88 see plot plan S.G. 11.1 119 pef III 96%
815 1/22/88 see plot plan S.G. 12.5 121 pef III 97%
B16 1/22/88 see plot plan S.G. 11.1 122 pef III 98%
B17 1/22/88 see plot pl an S.G. 17.6 121 pef I 98%
B18 1/22/88 see plot plan S.G. 14~3 123 pef III 99%
B19 1/22/88 see plot plan S.G. 11.1 110 pef V 96%
B20 1/22/88 see plot plan S.G. 8.1 122 pef III 98%
B21 1/25/88 see plot plan Base 5.3 130 pef IX 97%
B22 1/25/88 see plot plan Base 12.3 129 pef IX 96%
823 1/25/88 see plot plan Base 9.9 133 pef IX 99%
plot plan 8.1 128 pef IX 96% .
824 1/25/88 see Base
B25 1/25/88 see plot plan Base 6.0 130 pef IX 97%
B26 1/25/88 see plot plan Base 5.3 132 pef IX 99%
B27 1/25/B8 see plot plan Base 8.1 133 pef IX 99%
B28 1/25/88 see plot plan Base 6.4 131 pef IX 98%
B29 1/25/88 see plot plan Base 12.3 133 pef IX 99%
B30 1/25/88 see plot plan Base 9.9 130 pef IX 97%
rnNTlNII,n
q~~o
17 ~ 71r
Job No. 87-4921
Figure No. lIe
51
Compaction Test Resulb
Depth Moisture Field Soil Relative
Test Date Location Fill 0.'0 Density Type Compaction
B31 1/25/88 see plot plan Base 8.1 132 pef IX 9B%
B32 1/25/88 see plot plan Base 5.3 130 pef IX 97%
B33 1/25/88 see plot plan Base 1!.1 128 pef IX -95%
B34 1/25/88 see plot plan 8ase 9.3 129 pef IX 96%
"
B35 1/25/88 see plot plan Base 9.3 127 pef IX 95%
TYPE
SOIL ClASSIFICATION
OESCRIPTION OPTIMUM MOISTURE
MAXIMUM DRY DENSITY
Brown, silty sand with SOr.le clay. 9.5%
124 pef
II
Dark brown, sandy clay. 12.2%
124 pcf
III
Red-brown, fine to medium sand. 10.5%
124 pef
IV
Brown, slightly silty sand. 10.6%
126 pcf
V
Tan. silty fine sand. 7.7%
115 pc f
VI
Brown, silty. fine to coarse sand. 9.2%
134 pcf
VII
light gray, fine to medium sand. 11.0%
121 pcf
VIII
Gray-brown, medium to coarse sand with rock. B.7%
145 pcf
IX
Gray-brown, fine to coarse sand with rock. 11.1S
134 pcf
I
d~~o
( 3 - 75-
Job No. 87-4921
Figure No, lid
5,/
. '-~9-1
I
I
I, i
\....JI"I ."
(- .
,.
-\
.
,. ('
,
--.)
}
8'"
... -'}
'-, . \..-r
__ _.P?
'" r'\ G
~ ('-
c;) \
a:r.... \
r -.:. . -->
__ ..... \J
~ .
. .
----- :~
/-- -; .
\ .
,-"
(
~
'-
~
/
,
'\
L /"\-J
If>
.
Z
0
m
Cl
0
.
Z
0
.
'"
N
0
Z
.
m
.
If>
~
m
'"
Z ~:'"
'" ::00
. "
;= -
'"
0
.
0
I
I
\
,,-
I
'-- .
.
e -
.
,
'\
I
I
I .
(
./
)
\-
\
.. ,,\.
. :.. c G:-
. . \
... "" :( ... 0 0
~.=z~'"
I: ; : ; CI ~
a... ::I: i ::I:
:II '" ; ... .. 0
.. '" III P' ,... ...
i Z Z 0_..
n nO'" :
... :z: :z: ::II ...
: ... ... :: "
% ... ... III :II :;
n .. ... < .. '"
% ... ... .. 0 ...
...:Z: ...
~ 0
z .
.
.
.
.
( g /fG
,
cn
,
,
c
c
o
.
'0
'"
.
-<
!j
"
c
z
.
H I 0
= >> .
, . .
, . c
<
. . . ...
- . 0 m
0 0 - "
. .
. . 0 m
. . Z
0 . 0
. .
. <
. n
. .
. <
. .
0 .
c
z
c '0
>>
.
<
.
-
.
.
.
.
.
.
z
n
z
.
.
"'...... c _._...._...."1
L~ L.I-..~...... ._..,....:.~,:::..
1,M.1ol.... p .,...vI"""
-..;. ....1.,,_ Ie< .. "')cr,., '0' n")H":! .."p" -
I~~.~I ~L~J
.'
. I
i .'~ .
~l!h -1
~id~ii!,
'! P lU,dl
fi Ii lIim!
~ .11t'l!!
II !~ll?fhJI
'11f1!ijlli
. ~lt !ll;:~t
~!ill!.alli :
.. .. ..,..11' ir'
, I~ ~!~ ",..:tl~..:.:;-.::" ::."
J..,'1'"~L" -~. .
" !l. _ .. ,.,. ~ ',',"oi- ..' -.'
J1 ~~'lh'.:s"- ~~ ;
, -1!~'T1' - .'
. , W:Ylti;l ]::
,/t..",Hr(~; .": I,
I 1~" ", ~,I
';'~-U' ~~'" j.
""'~_. " ~
.'":" ...#1 {l
'1- -,~ ..--' I T~ c
~ ;"~"''::h~'.( ~
. ~"~'Q---tibl~:~J ~
,,;-'l]'-:,...-...~-(.
~;.t~1...J:-;'i1' " . ~c'"
~. _". . . .1<'.
.h.._~u.._..,~
- "
\
1"" !"r'" 'I '''I 1'1
) ; .' i I!i ~ ~!1 :: ;!: ! ; ~ I
,11'1""1 I,I'J'I II.
~1'1 .i;:;.j: :.'1 It!
I dl! l:!~::' 1,1 ~I; II
I : Ii! : -I' ~.: \ ! iJ j": !;!
;1i'j i:!~:~1 =n I:P ~Ii
I'I~I' n='!l' II' I.ft! '11
,I!;~ li:i:::1:1';:il!11 ~
II,'" "',1""'1.",,1'1--
1'::'1 ,:i,:i\ i:J i:~, 'm "'I
I'! ~ . rIll,' ", ., t" ,.'.
""11'\'1' I'"
(i:I:; I.iq, ::. pi.lli\! .
1'llqll',.I"!l!I.!,11 'I:' I
'..' 'j" ..'" - 100'
Id::lll ili ;:"rl:t 1ft ~t
U-~"9 :
-- ,
c._~' ."
-~i.4 I":'
,;
. I.
1
~ ~
.
. '
,; , '
, ~ ~ '
9. G o~
~ ,-
. ~ lE,
,.Ii
crjjJ
~ ~ii
cr "
1.0 ~5,
~lH
~. ~
I:
,
I
g 1'[ i
~
~I
..J '
a. '
w ~
::! ~
i
U1 ;
.j.
il!; ,U ,
),ii 1'0 ~
Jt> - 1..1\ !., ~
(~fl- t~l (
~;(~: ~! f1
W~!:~ 11
j',llt, ii~ i
Il'~ .1:1
,~~~f >-~~ Jl
!l~'l~ :f'~ ')11
....1 . "i I:
h~~'~ 1\
t!..~ Jt>-t ~
h~t!( ~u~ "
h
"
~I
",II
ill I~I f.
iil III I II' r
,I. I;
Iii 'i; " !
". r.41!1 " .
,.1; Hi! 'I [
11:'11" I I
~ii: ,ji; ~!!!I
"j
.:'
I: II!: 1"1' i t.1
, I' I I ~ I I" i
J! r, :',1,1 1;11
~ ! I , I : II t'! j' I . J .
Iii" ill 'j );;11(:111
~ r~ j;;-::; jil! ! :111:
jj'll,'1 !:I,!,,'!';I\
jl p.!;l-;!!!! '1;1
I' l~i:2: ill ',:: j II;;,
'jJ.l,,!,.,!p:lij'l1/
I: .~, 11" II I "Ll. .".
i: i ~. ...,.'
,
I
, '
,
I
,
,
~~
:1;
;:-
i~I
,:1
~.'_.
1 , I
-
1]-'17
, IIII1I1II111
t S',~,t1'/6'."'~~ '11m """","""'W"rollOl: ~"""').Ooo.,.., IlV05 1M(
r' ~ SL:B11I-OCfVNOSlIN-- .~
.
f
!
.
{
;
,
,
, '
~
r
, .
r _ ~ . .
~ ':.J, .~,;;. ,t ,'~'4. :.. J ~
p-." .i~~.1;~fi-f~MJ6U ~
1~ :,'.,'.' Uk'" ..:/, ~~~ I.,
~;;I!~~~I';I'!i;"-:;r ~
~,.i~. ;oI.~ .!, ,./ '::~Iii D
.' ~.., ' i.r,..";....l ~ ~
~.,., ;".' .' ", '.-"1
\ '.f. ~ , ,V!,
I'!t, "-'111";:' .., "If'''''''',
, i::'~M ". ...-,;" J
i!jLfy" 'I .I,~ ~
l"f'c. ~;;;:~ 1, ~","".:.:...,' fL
ljf .......;; .,.......~/ ..,:
~" :-"-~'" r
.;l' t - ~...
. !: 0( ~; I " 1 .
0(" 1 ~.: i ~r,: i .:
'" ,; ",. ~ pol ..... . (
"c- A" ~t-:\ ~.1 ~ OJ
~ = v~"" 11.. '1 f ( .
'J.'. ...~j":.~~~.~
" ". ~ II ,.,.." ,
n lih':.'&f ;t"..t: ~
~ ~J.~
~ ' . - j
"'."';...:.::\:.;::..._-:.!~.), ( j -~:
..-..............- - -+
., ':-:.':':I':;":-":::::-:;;'''/i \.~j
...._~:h..~ _.. ...... I'
..
';1
. ,
, 11 , ~~
~ .~
; i 1 ~ .,t . .
\ " '. . , ,
F;'t :: __!~ : ..
(
j[itB1 ,
,
-' ' ,I ,"t.+ "
r 11 "'~I ,
z
.
\ K,: .,' J :~ "
'-~ ,
~ ~ I - , ~
\
,
. . '{
,t \, ~j
.,
, I! " .'
I ,- ~t . .
l: ~ , .' 1 ~ " I ,
.' f ill " - ~
"
-.;~ .. 'T .~ ~
!lj -.. '.
J :l~ .,
...".. 'n :~ : - .
Itrt \~ r .
,
~
-".~-.. ~I
. I' '~'. ,
.: D' 1fr1"'- j
j -. ~~
, i' ~. '1 ,
. .
\ " ,(, , .
'l .... (. D
II · .." . .
-..;,.,,'1 ".: ..... .
....... -
,r
,
. c
...'....'.. .~
1,j.lt<"IVI../NI_
_ W",;~1g'
: I
...
'l
. :
.
i
J~
!
.-
'"
...
I-
e:
. .Xi
. . "{
L d ~
l~ h
~;.-~ '!
~l I ~.I.
....:s
1 fl::l' <'
;:: II"):/~
'. .01
! ~.
'-~[j
.: .,- :fl. . Ii
~ ; I: ~ '_~"
-"!;,I 1 ij. ~,
"~, J c: \1","
....:... -'." '(
" Il .
.1 <lo,
I .vr'~
~!j" I ~
I "
., l,q
. J ~
If ) l
~J~i
'g i ~ (
-+ ~~
- J
........'........
.......
----......
.....-......-
J
fJ!1
I...
ill ~
H! :
~1! ~i,
n:l:
'Iii!
Hi ii,
,
"
1=,1_1
. l-.!j
loi!;.
,!lj!;
,':>1 i
:, He, ~
;!i!1ii '!I
jl :l!r: ~
II!i'l, II
'j"'; ;!:
1; d!:j ~
~l il:!li i
...." .
I
II j
j'
II
11
. 'I'" I I I..
i: ~,:;l; . ! '! ! l
~~. ....1; I I I I II 'I t.,
. , ' " . I' I. 'I I
lE~ 'I' I II ; .!I,: .
~- I! I II I f"l II f'
s~ jl!J 111):1 J! ~h III t": \,11 ~ : .!,
",
,II
X
~2-
/
,'.,' ."',C\
.
,
{
;'1 f
;i .:
,., .;
. al ;
~, i::' I :;
1 - ..
i t.-iv\
~
.....,~.,
--j:'::'-,"",
~
,
j..;.
'"I
,.
r
ii
I"
;
1
,
.. 1 J
',j '" ~
; ~ H! ~ ;" I J
I ! i ~~ ~ H ": ,:
:.{ ~~~
1" l~
;ir~i.,.-l-
i ~ - -. .._,'l--:;,'!~rl
_ .cr--:-:=-f" .'..
-~ ,
1-: :_; I '
i1:j-: .
"1'i' I r=-.~--J
..z! 1--.c..! .
I
,
i 9';-1]
.'tlIl"l.,l.O"....~""".....
...,.....1.-.0
II..... .
09 ~
:j*'
4
,
.' t
:1 I-
. i ~l ,
mJ
~
~
~
,
.
,
,
"
.
{
.
.
'~ ~ ',?:
,.,...-;
II . ,"I I '
III I".. I
:, I nil I.
'; : I j I ~ : I
il' ! ,';1, !, .
.1, :., I I
.I! 'I.' li_
:; ! ::;~ I ~ !
11! i 'Iil : .' f,
.!I, " . II
ji:: i ni: 1111?!
.- " R
, .
if II"
i, J g;
" ; -II
J1 I II,
II jf:;)
J, .;ji;
:;. II I ~:
i:, I II E;
. I:; ,i I~ ! ~ I
~ ..: .i ~. 1\1
II
I,
Ii
i :';
J ,"
~ Ii::
~ ','
Ii ~; L
~ ~l Ii
I: I' Ii! 1 di' i i:ll,;ll !:! I,
IT I.;! I :jl I I'i .'. IU l !.','
, ,'.. .1.1 I. i"i, I
;; jlj I ';iJ. ~ I .'J ,.1 j' _ '..j
" .'1 '\'",111 ,J.I.I II
;II' !!; ~! ~ !,t: i I: I~ j Ii: ii; if I
1 lp .j I I; j j' I~' ~:! !," 1 II
Ii 11'1 !.jlt ,Jill i..l"I, I,
" ~111;'i'I.,:II.i'" 1;:i::l:III,\1
'I ,I,'I'.!;.I,:'! .,..1". I;
! I. ,II,l,I;:il!1 il; "".f .,f..
n . :In J! ~ :"1.0 : .' ;1 : ~;H !If. . ~ i ~! .
4"
J:
$l
..
~
f
~
>
~
~
~
.
~'
I II II I I , I I I I
I
:.I{
ii;
.
I
~
I
+0-
-- j
i
:'I[]I : 0t:,;,:;~~C2~~~"~~S?9~~i
.....L-- .. ,..~. "7~_..._..,.:::..o..,...c....~......~
>-3
o
'U
----0
Gl
;0
:0-
'U
~
;:;:
3:
::>
'U
ta
~ i i: .. r !'
lido
EC 171
~"^
J .-
\;
';!
.
:. \
\
~
IL_~""" .' _
. .
DETAIL A
SCALE 1"=200'
@
8
~
'J"
J$'~
6ij
QSEC 170
.1<
568.8B
,.y.3-/7"..3,,"j,A/.
030
A-
"",
~
48
SHT. 4
r;:.
~
is..
~
dl
~
~.
L
Y",
~
-;-
is..
"",
.
~
..
~ ~
x:t
\ ".
or: '.
"~'.
", ......
-,OH3~.
~~.~~~.
1#1 ~......
j..<f" ~ '_..
~!,1" ~ ,th.~.
~. ~ ~.
~'?-f,<
~.,"
~~
","-
. ~ ,
~.~o.:r
~-....~'t.
,,).....<Q
to~
-/
~
is..
"",
L
"",
.
-
~
,
"
. ~ ,j6. C
f',"o'" "
~t
'\ ;.
on
DETAIL'S"
SCALE J'~400'
35
,et>.
,'f"
~,,3.jj, "3
vt.ll!.
1<",,'4
,0.
<~
,.
~
MAP 1198 - BAY VILLA TCT RESUB
MAP J66 (M 505) - RpNCHO DE LA NAC
\
POR OSEC 163. 164
Mi~ 347,375.399 - ROS 882, SI7J 4585,
~
I J~Jo
:">
Conditions of Approval
The project proposal shall comply with:
1.
All conditions set forth in Council Resolution No.
Permit PCC-93-26.
(PamlDisk# 12/ coapvl63 . doc)
If -} (
ATTACHMENT II
Coastal Development Permit #63
May 18, 1993
approving Conditional Use
~5
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PARTY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Statement of disclosure of certain ownership interests, payments, or campaign contnbutions, on all mal
which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council, Planning Commission, and all otl..,r
official bodies. The following information must be disclosed:
1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the contract, i.e., contractor,
subcontractor, material supplier.
Foster Properties
PHM Corporation
HSG Corporat~on
2. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all
individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership
interest in the partnership.
Stanley Foster
P. 'lichael McDonald
Lillian Greenwald
3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is non-profit organization or a trust, list the names
of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or
trustor of the trust.
4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of the City staff,
Boards, Commissions, Commillees and Council within the past twelve months? Yes
No lI.....- If yes, please indicate person(s):
5. Please identify each and every person, including any agents, employees, consultants or independent
contractors who you have assigned to represent you before the City in this maller.
Bennet B. Greenwald
6. Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggregate, contributed more than $1,000 to a
Councilmember in the current or preceding election period? Yes _ No ~ If yes, state which
Councilmember(s):
Per"nn is defined as: "Any indil'idual,jirm, co-pnnncrsllip,joinf vennlre, associmion, social club. fraternal organization, corpornrion,
(,S((/{L', 111/51, recclver, syndicate, this and an)' olher county. city and counTT}(, ci municipalit)', disn-icr or other pollficnl subdh'iS10Il,
or n11Y orller group or combmnlion actmg as n unit.'"
(I\OTE: Alloch additionol pages os necessary) ~ t:,
D:ile: 1/27/93
dlure f contractor/appl cant
ster Properties, /0 The Greenwald Compan
Bennet B. Greenwald, President
Print or type name of contractor/applic:1D1
IRC'\'I~t'd: I] .":U'JOj
S.IJ
-
! \.: I :. \'O!$CLOSLTXT]
It - J.z
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item 19
Meeting Date 05/18/93
ITEM TITLE:
RESOLUTION 17125 Approving the 1993-94 Community Development
Block Grant (CDBG) budget and authorizing the transmittal of the CDBG
Application, Final Statement, and Certifications to the U.S. Department
of Housing and Urban Development
Community D7velo ment Director C L; ,
;:
City Manage
(4/5ths Vote: Yes No X)
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND:
In the Fiscal Year 1993-94, the City of Chula Vista will receive $1,664,000 in CDBG
entitlement funds and will have program income and prior year funds available for re-allocation
in the amount of $642,672. Staff recommendations are summarized in the attached Proposed
CDBG Budget Options (see attached Exhibits 1 and 2). Staff has thoroughly considered the
recommendations of several advisory Commissions and committees and the comments made at
the public hearing before City Council on May 4 and II.
RECOMMENDATION:
[A] Staff recommends that Council select either Option B or D.
(a) It is recommended that the YMCA be encouraged to meet with City to discuss
other funding options.
(b) Reprogram $100,000 during year for Parkway Complex Renovation, if savings
from other projects become available.
[B] Adopt the Resolution approving the 1993-94 Community Development Block Grant
(CDBG) budget and authorizing the transmittal of the CDBG Application, Final
Statement, and Certifications to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban
Development.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: See pages 13, 24, 30 and 32 of the
CDBG Notebook.
On May 5, 1993 the Economic Development Commission voted 5-0 to support the request of
CDBG funding for a High Tech/Biotech Zone Environmental Impact Report; and voted 3-1-4-1,
with one abstention, to oppose the request for CDBG funding for the Border Environmental
Commerce Zone Coordinator. Minutes of the EDC meeting are attached as Exhibit 4; also,
attached as Exhibit 5 is a letter from the Chair of the EDC.
1'1-1
Page 2, Item 19
Meeting Date 05/18/93
DISCUSSION:
· PROPOSED BUDGET
For the 1993-94 CDBG program, the City of Chula Vista has total estimated revenue of
$2,306,672. (Note: This revenue figure is $58,000 higher than estimated in the budget presented
last week, due to additional funds available from prior years). This includes the annual
entitlement ($1,664,000), existing and anticipated program income funds from housing
rehabilitation loans ($299,670), reallocation funds from prior City-funded projects either
completed or canceled ($268,288) and unused Section 108 funds ($74,714). The proposed
budget is attached as Exhibit 1 and includes four Options, which are summarized as follows:
Ootion A Ootion B Ootion C Option D
ADMINISTRATION AND PLANNING $ 323,000 $ 323,000 $ 273,000 $ 273,000
SOCIAL SERVICES 250,000 250,000 250,000 250,000
(includes funding for 26 organizations)
SECTION 108 LOAN REPAYMENT (Norman Park) 277,907 277,907 277,907 277 ,907
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS 1,089,151 1,214,151 1,314,151 1,214,151
COMMUNITY PROJECTS 366,600 241,600 191,600 291,600
Note: Administration and Planning is $50,000 less in Option C and D because the High-Tech/BioTech EIR
is in this category and it will receive reduced funding under these Options.
The difference between the four budget Options can be summarized as follows:
Option A Option B Option C Option D
High Tech/BioTech EIR $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 50,000 $ 50,000
Otay Neighhorhood Rev. Program 263,800 I") 273,800 273,800 273,800
Parkway Complex Renovation<-> 0 182,655 I") 282,655 182,655 I")
Fourth Ave, Del Rey to Orange (design) 67,655 01") 01") 01")
CVESD Playgrounds 50,000 25,000 25,000 25,000
YMCA Aquatics Facility<-> 100,000 0 0 100,000
Border Environmental Zone 100,000 100,000 50,000 50,000
I")
Indicates project funding is different from amount recommended in the proposed 1993-94 Capital Improvements
Program Budget.
Reprogram $100,000 during year for Parkway Complex Renovation, if savings from other projects become
available.
1-> It is recommended that the YMCA be encouraged to meet with City to discuss other funding options.
<->
J 'f.. z..
Page 3, Item 19
Meeting Date 05/18/93
Staff recommendations on all other projects remain the same in the four Options. The Parkway
Complex Renovation is not funded in Option A, partially funded in Option B and D, and almost
fully funded in Option C. The YMCA Aquatics Facility is partially funded in Option A and D,
and not funded in Options B and C. The two economic development projects are fully funded
in Options A and B, and partially funded in option C and D.
The following proposals were noteworthy endeavors, but were not considered high priorities by
staff: North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFfA) Implementation Strategy Plan and the
Regional Task Force on Homeless. Staff recommends Gas Tax funding in lieu of CDBG
funding for paving of the Nature Interpretive Center road.
Proiect Elil!ibilitv. Tbe Community Development Plan. and Soecial Activities:
In order to be eligible for funding, a project or service must address at least one of the CDBG
national objectives. All of the projects recommended for funding meet the national objective of
primary benefit to low-income, except for the Community Appearance Program and LSS Home
Repair Program, which meets the national objective to aid in the prevention of slums and blight.
Three years ago, the City adopted the 1990-91 to 1992-93 Community Development Plan (see
pages 2 and 3 of the Notebook). This Plan outlines the City's specific community development
goals and objectives for the CDBG program and provides a guide for making allocations. All
of the CDBG projects and services recommended for funding meet the goals and objectives of
the Community Development Plan. Staff recommends adoption of this Plan without any changes
as the 1993-94 to 1995-96 Community Development Plan.
Staff recommends that the Council make a finding for the Community Appearance Program,
SBCS Graffiti Eradication, SBCS Community Development Corporation project, and the Border
Environmental Commerce Zone that they are necessary and appropriate in order to meet the
goals and objectives of the City's Community Development Plan. This finding is required by
HUD in order to fund these special activities by community-based organizations.
Social Service Fundinl! Reouests:
The City received 33 requests from social service organizations, totaling over $616,000. Twenty
six of these programs are recommended for funding for a total amount of $250,000. Staff
recommendations for social service funding, along with the Commissions' recommendations, are
summarized in Exhibit 2. Staff recommendations are as follows:
Prol!ram
Reauested
Recommended
Adult Protective Services
AIDS Foundation San Diego
American Youth Soccer Org.
Assoc. for Retarded Citizens
$ 12,000
10,000
7,070
15,000
$ 9,000
4,000
o
o
,Q,.3
Boys and Girls (Target Outreach)
Boys and Girls (Educ. Enhancement)
Center for Women's Studies & Services
Chula Vista Connection
Chula Vista Police--PAL
Chula Vista Police--Intervention
Chula Vista Library--Literacy Team
Chula Vista Police/Fire--CAST
Community Service Center for Disabled
Episcopal Com. Svcs.(Outreach Health)
Episcopal Com. Svcs.(Alcohol&Drug)
Hermandad Mexicana Ncnl. Leg. Ctr.
Jobs for Youth
Laubach Lit. Council/SD Cty.,Inc.
L.S.S. Project Hand Emergency
MAAC Project (Emergency Food)
MAAC Project (Nosotros)
Salvation Army Senior Nutrition
Senior Adult Services Meals on Wheels
YMCA Pryde Program
YMCA Sunshine Co. (Otay site)
YMCA Summer Day Camp
YMCA Sunshine Company Childcare
SCCOA Shared Housing
SBCS Casa Nuestra Youth Shelter
U.S. Institute of Amateur Athletics
Woodlawn Park Community Center
YMCA Family Stress Center
YWCA Battered Women's Services
Page 4, Item 19
Meeting Date 05/18/93
24,950
15,721
10,000
20,000
5,000
25,000
43,190
15,000
13,000
20,000
35,000
30,000
3,100
1,500
20,000
10,000
20,000
17,000
15,000
36,727
8,833
7,000
44,279
18,000
25,000
20,000
31,000
22,400
10,000
o
10,000
5,000
o
4,000
15,000
40,900
6,000
9,000
10,000
o
o
3,100
o
14,000
7,500
o
o
7,500
o
7,000
6,000
10,000
15,000
15,000
5,000
22,000
20,000
5,000
Staff arrived at these recommendations after completing an extensive evaluation process which
included:
(1) Review of the requests for funding;
(2) Compilation of the Proposal Comparison Table (provided to Council Members at
the May 4 Council meeting);
(3) Listening to presentations by new applicants at a Joint Commission Workshop
(4) Attendance at all meetings in which Commissions discussed the social service requests;
and
(5) Consideration of testimony at the public hearing on of May 4 and 11, 1993 and
Council comments.
Staff then rated the requests using the Proposal Evaluation Matrix and Social Service Funding
Policy. The priorities identified in the Social Services Plan were used as a basis for scoring the
,,- ~
Page 5, Item 19
Meeting Date 05/18/93
first criterion of the Matrix, "Enhancing the Quality of Life in the City. " These priorities were
social service providers with programs relating to Alcohol and Drug Abuse, Child Care and
Latchkey Programs, and Child and Spousal Abuse/Domestic Violence. The completed Proposal
Evaluation Matrix is attached as Exhibit 3.
Using the scores from the Matrix together with the recommendations from the four
Commissions, staff determined funding levels for each program. Those organizations returning
this fiscal year for the same amount or additional funds were held at a maximum equal to the
amount of their last year's award. Recommendations on one of the funding requests deviated
from the process described above. The Literacy Team is proposed for funding at $40,900
because of strong community support and the potential impact on the General Fund if not funded
out of CDBG at this level.
Communitv Proiects Fundine: Reauests:
The City received several proposals from neighborhood-based organizations and the Chula Vista
Elementary School District. They have been grouped under the category of "Community
Projects". Staff has determined that these proposals are eligible for CDBG funding, will
primarily benefit low-income households, and are not subject to the 15 % social services cap.
Staff recommends funding 7 projects for a total of $471,000, as follows:
Chula Vista Building and Housing -- Community Appearance Program
Requested: $27,000 Recommended: $15,000
PURPOSE: In cooperation with local neighborhood groups, the Building and Housing
Dept. proposes to continue their neighborhood beautification campaigns.
RATIONALE: Staff recommends reduced funding in order to provide adequate funding
for other community projects. This will reduce the number of neighborhood campaigns
from four to two.
South Bay Community Services -- Grriffiti Eradication
Requested: $38,261
Recommended: $33,600
PURPOSE: South Bay Community Services (SBCS), in partnership with the Chula Vista
Police Department will continue their community effort to eradicate graffiti painted on
private businesses and residences.
RATIONALE: This amount of funding will keep their budget at the same level as last
year.
1'1-5
Page 6, Item 19
Meeting Date 05/18/93
SHCS Community Development Corporation
Requested: $57,025
Recommended: $48,000
PURPOSE: South Bay Community Services (SBCS) will continue to work on two
affordable housing projects: the Short Term Housing Facility and the Transitional Housing
Project at 31 and 17 Fourth Ave., respectively. In addition, other projects include the
Homebuyer Education Project and the Affordable Apartment Referral Guide.
RATIONALE: In order to ensure that this program is community supported, staff
recommends that SBCS be given a $48,000 "match" allocation. This type of funding
guarantees at least 50/50 support from the City and community. SBCS successfully
matched this year's grant, raising over $78,000 from banks, developers, businesses,
foundations, and individuals.
Chula Vista Elementary School District -- Five Playgrounds
Requested: $125,000 Recommended: Option A- $50,000
Option B/C/D- $25,000
PURPOSE: To improve playgrounds at five elementary school sites: Vista Square,
Harborside, Feaster, Mueller and Otay. These playgrounds will be open for community
use after school hours and on weekends through a joint use agreement.
RATIONALE: The City and School District will both benefit from these playground
improvements through the joint use agreement. The School District has agreed to provide
signage and public access during non-school hours. Funding is recommended at a level
equal to or less than last year in order to provide funding for other Community Projects.
Home Repair for Seniors
Requested: $20,000
Recommended: $20,000
PURPOSE: This project has already been approved by City Council under a 16 month
contract with Lutheran Social Services to provide health and safety home repairs to seniors.
RATIONALE: This program meet the overwhelming demand from Chula Vista seniors
for this type of assistance. A 1992 survey by the Human Services Council found 200
seniors in need of minor health and safety home repairs.
YMCA Aquatics Facility
Requested: $250,000
Recommended: Option A/D- $100,000
Option B/C- 0
PURPOSE: These funds will assist in the financing of lap, instructional and therapy pools,
as well as exercise rooms and training facilities. These facilities will be open to all Chula
Vista residents. The YMCA will monitor users by utilizing a "bar-code" system to
I~- k
Page 7, Item 19
Meeting Date 05/18/93
determine that it benefits a minimum of 51 % low-income individuals. The YMCA desires
a total City contribution of $1 million over 4 years.
RATIONALE: The YMCA will provide classes and activities in the facilities at reduced
or no cost to seniors and lower-income citizens. Staff recommends either supporting their
$5.5 million capital campaign with an upfront $100,000 grant, or waiting until next year
to make a funding decision after evaluating the YMCA's fundraising progress. Also, it
is recommended that the YMCA meet with the staff to discuss other funding options.
SBCS Sholt Tenn Housing Facility
Requested: $150,000
Recommended: $0
PURPOSE: To provide up to 60 day shelter for South Bay families, enabling them to
regain self-sufficiency.
RATIONALE: Council conceptually approved $150,000 of CDBG funding on March 23,
however an alternative source of revenue is $150,000 of Low/Mod funds remaining from
the Otay NRP Phase I Street Improvements. This alternative funding can be re-
appropriated as part of the Agency budget adoption process. The funds are necessary to
complete acquisition of the building at 31 Fourth A venue. Funding is conditioned on
SBCS obtaining other necessary funding and a conditional use permit.
Border Environmental Commerce Zone (BECZ) CoordinoJor
Requested: $100,000 Recommended: Option A/B- $100,000
Option C/D- $50,000
PURPOSE: To partially fund the BECZ Coordinator who will staff the proposed non-
profit administering agency for the BECZ and who will be responsible for implementing
the program.
RATIONALE: Staff recommends that the $50,000-100,000 be matched by $100,000-
150,000 in public or private funds to meet the proposed $200,000 total budget. Staff also
recommends that CDBG funds be contingent upon receiving letters of intent from the City
and County of San Diego, and that the contract with the Zone Coordinator provide for
performance benchmarks.
Caoital hnorovement Proiects:
The proposed budget for capital improvement projects ranges between $1.3 and $1.6 million,
which includes the repayment of the Section 108 loan for the Norman Park Senior Center
Renovation ($277,907). Staff recommends funding as follows:
19~7
Page 8, Item 19
Meeting Date 05/18/93
Neighborhood Revitalization Program
Requested: $273,800
Recommended: Option A- $263,800
Option B/CID- $273,800
PURPOSE: To design and construct the third phase of improvements in Otay, including
missing sidewalks and street lights.
RATIONALE: The Otay Town Committee sees this project as an integral part of the
revitalization efforts in Otay.
South Chula Vista Library -- Construction
Requested: $378,196
Recommended: $378,196
PURPOSE: For construction of the library this fall.
RATIONALE: This allocation is necessary to ensure that construction of the South Chula
Vista Library can begin this fall. The slowdown in construction activity has meant that
revenues to the Library DIF (a primary source of funds for the construction) are
temporarily decreased from what staff had originally projected. Also, since Library DIF
Funds are received over many years, part of the funding from this source may not be
accumulated in time for the construction of this project and Block Grant Funds over the
next two years are necessary to complete the funding of the library.
ADA Modifications
Requested: $36,000
Recommended: $36,000
PURPOSE: To provide for modification to City facilities as required by the Americans
with Disabilities Act making them accessible to individuals with disabilities. This includes
signage, doors, and public access routes.
RATIONALE: Staff views compliance with the ADA as a high priority. This project and
the curb cuts are a good beginning for the City towards meeting ADA goals by July
of 1995.
Otay Park Renovation
Requested: $172,800
Recommended: $172,800
PURPOSE: To develop adjoining school grounds with the Chula Vista Elementary
School District as an addition to the existing neighborhood park in Otay.
RATIONALE: This project contributes to the Neighborhood Revitalization Program efforts
in the Otay Community and addresses the deficiency of parkland in southwest Chula Vista.
\ ~-I
Page 9, Item 19
Meeting Date 05/18/93
ADA Curb Cuts
Requested: $50,000
Recommended: $50,000
PURPOSE: To provide for the construction of concrete wheelchair ramps at an estimated
47 locations throughout the City.
RATIONALE: Please see rationale under ADA Modifications (above).
Fourth Avenue, Del Rey High School to Orange Avenue
Requested: $67,655 Recommended: Option A- $67,655
Option B/C/D- 0
PURPOSE: To widen Fourth Avenue allowing accommodation of a four-lane roadway
with bike lanes, curb, gutter, sidewalk, raised medians, and driveways on both sides ofthe
street.
RATIONALE: This segment of Fourth Avenue has missing curb, gutter, and sidewalks.
The project will make vehicular traffic more efficient and improve safety to pedestrians.
Plannim!. Fair Housinl! and Administration:
The proposed budget for 1993-94 includes $150,000 for program administration. These
administrative costs represent less than 7 % of the total budget and includes staff costs for
coordination, accounting, monitoring sub-recipients, environmental review, and reporting
requirements.
In addition, staff recommends funding for four organizations who are requesting funding for
planning and administrative activities, as follows:
Chula Vista Fair Housing Program
Requested: $29,000
Recommended: $29,000
PURPOSE: To provide a comprehensive fair housing program, including education and
outreach, a tenant-landlord hotline, follow-up on discrimination complaints, and fair
housing assessments.
RATIONALE: This program is designed to fulfill all of the City's responsibilities and
obligations for fair housing education and enforcement. The Housing Advisory Committee
recommended funding for this organization, but gave no specific level of funding.
J ~ -,
Page 10, Item 19
Meeting Date 05/18/93
Chura Vista Human Services Council
Requested: $25,000
Recommended: $24,000
PURPOSE: The Human Services Council builds coalitions among Chula Vista area social
service providers in order to bring more funding for needed services into the South Bay.
RATIONALE: The Human Services Council, through Project CARE, a community effort
to check on elderly who are isolated in their homes, has demonstrated its ability to make
coalition projects work and to bring more resources to South Bay agencies. This allocation
will continue to allow the Council to hire a part-time staff person and expand their efforts
beyond what volunteers alone can do. This is a $4,000 increase over last year which is
equal to the amount of funding that was previously provided out of the promotions budget.
Parks and Recreation Human Services Coordinator
Requested: $15,000
Recommended: $15,000
PURPOSE: To coordinate information and referral by human service agencies at the
Norman Park Senior Center and facilitate the provision of social services.
RATIONALE: About one-third of the Human Services Coordinator's time will be devoted
to activities which assist human service agencies; this funding level will cover one-third
of her salary.
Otay Committee
Requested: $5,000
Recommended: $5,000
PURPOSE: The Otay Committee will continue volunteer community revitalization and
beautification efforts, in conjunction with the Neighborhood Revitalization Program (NRP).
RATIONALE: The Olay Committee is an integral part of the Neighborhood Revitalization
program (NRP). Currently, the NRP Program is in the third year of the five year
program.
High Tech/BioTech Zone EIR
Requested: $100,000
Recommended: Option A/B- $100,000
Option C/D- $50,000
PURPOSE: To fund an up-front "master" Program EIR for Eastlake's Phase II Business
Center.
'~..IO
Page 11, Item 19
Meeting Date 05/18/93
RATIONALE: Staff recommends $50,000-100,000, but not to exceed 50% of the total
cost of the EIR and that the balance of the EIR cost be paid by Eastlake Development
Company. Further, that the award shall be contingent upon execution of an agreement
between Eastlake and the City outlining respective responsibilities for development of the
zone.
. REALWCATION OF FUNDS FROM COMPLETED AND CANCELED PROJECTS
Several completed and canceled projects have balances remaining. These funds should be
reallocated to other CDBG eligible projects, preferably to projects in which the funds will be
expended within the next fiscal year. The total amount of funds to be reallocated is $268,288.
In addition, $74,714 of unused Section 108 loan funds and $199,670 of unallocated program
income are available. Staff recommends that these funds, which total $542,672 be reallocated
to the following projects:
Section 108 loan repayment
Senior Home Repair Program
Otay Neighborhood Revitalization Program
$277,907
20,000
244.765
$542,672
Funds to be reallocated come from the following projects including the unused Section 108 loan
funds from the Norman Park Senior Center and Housing Rehabilitation Revolving Loan funds:
Norman Park Senior Center
630-63oo-PR110A
630-63oo-PR111
635-6350-PR11O
646-6460-PR110
$ 74,713.70
10.00
81.83
896.42
Housing Rehabilitation Revolving Loan Fund
632-6320
$ 199,670.00
Fourth/Orange Land Acquisition
640-64oo-PR143
634-6340-PR143
Economic Development Revolving Fund
633-6330- BG20 1
635-6350-BG201
$ 13,612.93
11,539.24
$ 1,837.44
1,600.00
$ 15,445.00
7,015.00
Economic Development Planning Studies
632-6320-BG201
647-6471-BG201
1't ... t'
Page 12, Item 19
Meeting Date 05/18/93
Administration
634-6340-BG218
644-6441-BG218
646-6461-BG218
648-6481-BG218
$ 736.57
111.49
50.00
99,000.00
Fair Housing Program
644-6441-BG219
646-6461-BG219
647-6471-BG219
$ 500.00
779.90
8,107.45
Telegraph Canyon Drainage
631-631O-BGl58
$ 4,883.17
Woodlawn Park
635-6350- BG20 1
$ 18.89
MAAC Project Otay Center Parking
644-6440-PRI44
$ 373.32
Neighborhood Revitalization Program
644-6441-BG235
$ 189.43
Murals Program
646-6461- BG244
$ 15,500.00
MAAC Project Office Building
647-6471-BGlOl
Otay Park Restroom Renovation
647-6470-PRI52
$ 50,000.00
$ 36,000.00
FISCAL IMPACT: The City will receive $1,664,000 in CDBG entitlement funds and $642,672
in other CDBG program income. Social services funding is limited to 15 % of the entitlement
plus program income; the $250,000 allocated to 26 social service organizations is below this
limit. In addition, the City is obligated to repay the Section 108 loan over the next 2 years; the
total payment for 1993-94 is $277,907.
[A,ICDBG93.113]
[C,IWP5l\CQUNCIL\l13SICDBG-93.113]
14 - '"1-
:~:r:}'
('l
@
o
o
-
-1\
,
<!!1>
-
V'
...............
'-
..0
,
.....
~
TOTAL REVENU~"
CDHG Entitlement
Current Program Income
Reallocation- unused from prior years
Section 108 Loan- unused funds
Estimated Program Income for 1993-94
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
Staff Administration
High Tech/Biotech Zone ElR
Fair Housing Program
C.V. Human Services Council
Parka&Rec Human Services Coordinator
Otay Committee
Regional Task Force on Homeless
NAFTA Implementation Strategy Plan
Total Administration and Plannin~ *
Total Social Services **
City C!P
1 !18:~-~:1
"'lna1
$1.56e.25o
$1. 380,000
$181. 000
$7,250
$1.568.250
$165,000
$30,000
$20,000
$10,000
$5,000
$230,000
$227,790
$291,e50
$332,500
$217 ,500
Sectlon lOB Loan Repayment ***
Otay Neighborhood Rev. Program
South Chula Vista Library- construction
Parkway Complex Renovation
ADA Modifications
Otay Park Renovation
ADA Curb Cuts
Fourth Ave.~ Del key H.S. to Orange Ave (design)
Main Library- Reroof
Main Library- HVAC
Main Library- Parking Lot
NIC Road Surfacing
Total City CIP
Community Projects
B&H Community Appearance Program
SHeS Community Dev. Program (Housing)
SBCS Grafitti Eradication
C.V. Elem. School Dist.- Playgrounds
Home Repair for Seniors
Woodlawn Park Comm. Cntr. Hehab
YMCA Aquatics ~acility
SBeS Short-term Housing Facility
Border Environmental Zone Coord.
Total Community Projects
$50,000
$44,850
$939,800
$26,810
$48,000
$33,600
$50,000
$7,250
$165,660
1:J::.n-~4 OPT. ion A
Preliminary
$2. ::l06. o"!:~
$1. 664 ,000
$199.670
$268.28H
$74,'/14
$100.000
$3.061.917
$165,000
$100.000
$29,000
$25,000
$15,000
$5,000
$3,000
$7,500
$349.500
$250,000
$277.907
$273,800
$376.186
$268,073
$36,000
$172,600
$50.000
$67,655
$120,700
$30,000
$1,695,131
$27,000
$57,025
$38,261
$125,000
$20,000
$250,000
$150,000
$100,000
$767,286
$2,306.608
$150.000
$100,000
$29,000
$24,000
$15,000
$5,000
$0
$0
$323,000
$250,000
$277,907
$263,800
$378,196
$0
$36.000
$172,600
$50,000
$67,655
$120,700
$0
$1,367,058
$15,000
$48,000
$33,600
$50,000
$20,000
$100,000
$0
$100,000
$366.600
()pt.i on H
$2.306,656
$150,000
$100,000
$29,000
$24,000
$15,000
$5,000
$0
$0
$323,000
$250,000
$277,907
$273,800
$378,196
$182,655
$36,000
$172,800
$50,000
$0
$120,700
$0
$1,492,058
$15,000
$48,000
$33,600
$25,000
$20,000
$0
$0
$100,000
$241,600
E't~, SIT
-
Uption C
$2,306, 658
$150,000
$50,000
$29,000
$24,000
$15,000
$5,000
$0
$0
$273,000
$250,000
$277 , 907
$273,800
$378,196
$282,655
$36 , 000
$172,800
$50.000
$0
$120,700
$0
$1,592,058
$15,000
$48 , 000
$33,600
$25,000
$20,000
$0
$0
$50,000
$191.600
\
Option U
$2.306,656
$150,000
$50,000
$29,000
$24,000
$15,000
$5 . 000
$0
$0
$273,000
$250,000
$277,907
$273,800
$378, 196
$182,655
$36 , 000
$172,800
$50,000
$0
$120,700
$0
$1,492,058
$15,000
$48 , 000
$33,600
$25,000
$20,000
$100.000
$0
$50 , 000
$291,600
-
..J)
,
-
lJ\
~
-
~
, ** OrQ"nizatlon
~
..t,
199j-94 CDBG Social Service ~undlnQ RecommendatIons
1 Adult Protective Services
2 AIDS Foundation San Dieoo
3 American Youth Soccer Organization
q Assoc. for Retarded Citizens
5 Boys & Girls Club of C.V.
6 Boys & Girls Club of Chula Vista
7 Center for Women's Studies & Svcs
8 Chula Vista Connection
9 Chula Vista Police Deot.
10 Chula Vista Police Dept.
11 Citv of C.V. Librarv
12 CIty of (.V. Police anrt Fire Deots.
13 Community Service entre for Disabled
14 Episcooal Community Services
15 Episcopal Community Services
16 Hermandad Mexicana Ncnl Leo. Ctr.
17 Jobs for Touth
18 Laubach Lit. Council/SD Cty.. Inc.
- 19 Lutheran Social SVcs
"" 20 MAAC Project
21 MAAC Project Health Srvcs. Div.
22 Salvation Army
23 Senior Adult ServIces
24 So. Bay Familv YMCA
25 So. Bav Family YMCA
26 So. Bay Family YMCA
27 So. Bay Familv YMCA
28 So. County Council on AQinQ
29 South Bay Community 5vcs
30 U.S. Institute of Amateur Athletics
31 Woodlawn Park Civic leaaue
32 YMCA Family Stress Center
33 YWCA Battered Women's Svcs
CDBG93. .!DB
Proaram
So. Bav Adult Health Care Cntr.
Soc. Srvcs. & Case Mnamt. Exoansion
C.V. HS playina field renovation
Vacnl. Rehab./Work Activity Prooram
T aroet Outreach
Education Enhancement Proaram
Proiect Safehouse/Raoe Crisis Cotr.
DayCare Center
Police Activities Leaaue
intervention Team
Chula Vista Literacy Team
Citizens Adversity Support Team
LSCU South
uutreach Health Education
So. Bay Alcohol & Druo Abuse Srvcs.
Parkvillaae Services Project
Temporary Employment
Chula Vista Literacy Team
Project Hand Emeroency Assistance
Emeroency Food Prooram
Nosotros
Senior Nutrition Cntr.
Meals on Wheels
Pryde ProQram
Sunshine Co. Childcare (Utav Site)
Summer Day Camo
Sunshine Co. Childcdre
Shared Housino
Casa Nuestra
Trainino & Education CntF.
Woodlawn Park Community Center
Child Abuse Treatment Svcs
Men s Counselina
ReQuest
$12.000
$10.000
$7.070
$15.000
$24.950
$15.721
$10.000
$20.000
$5.000
$25.00l)
$4:5.190
$15.000
$1:\.000
$20.000
$35.000
$30.000
$';.100
$1. 500
$20.000
10.000
$20.000
$17.000
$15.000
$.\6.727
$8.83:1
$7.000
$44.27'1
'15.000
$25.000
$20.400
$31. 000
$22.400
$10.000
PrevIous
$9.000
$0
$0
$0
$9.000
$0
$5.000
$0
$0
$15.000
$1l3.190
$0
$9.000
>10.000
$0
$0
$.1 .100
$0
$14.000
$0
$0
$0
$5.500
$0
$0
$6.000
$15.000
$15.000
$15.000
$0
$20.000
$20.000
$5.000
~~HIBIT
-
..
Ao:ina
$9.000
$5.000
$0
$5.000
$5.000
$0
$5.000
$0
$5.000
$lv~OOO
$12. (JOO
$5.000
$ 7 . 500
>15.000
$0
$0
$.\.100
$1. 500
$20.000
$7.500
$0
$0
$10.000
$20.000
$8.000
$6.000
$15.000
>15.000
$20.000
$0
$25.000
$20.000
$5.000
Youth
$9.000
$0
$5.000
$10.000
$10.000
$5.000
$5.000
$15.000
$5.000
$15.000
$20.000
$10.000
$ 5.000
$12.500
$0
$0
$3.100
$1.500
$10.000
$10.000
$8.000
$0
$10.000
$0
$8.000
$5.000
$15.000
$10.000
$15.000
$5.000
$15.000
$15.000
$5.000
z..
-
Human Rel
$12.000
$3.400
$0
$0
$5.000
$9.000
$10.000
$0
$2.000
$15.000
$15.000
$6.000
$13.000
$15.000
$0
$0
$.\.100
$0
$20.000
$10.000
$0
$0
$7.500
$0
$7.000
$7.000
$10.000
$15.000
$15.000
$0
$20.000
$20.000
$10.000
Sta ff
9,000
4,000
o
o
o
10,000
5,000
o
4,000
15,000
40,900
6,000
9,000
10,000
o
o
3,100
o
14,000
7,500
o
o
7,500
o
7,000
6,000
10,000
15,000
15,000
5,000
22,000
20,000
5,000
-
-D
\
-
--1
PROPOSAl EVALUATION MATRIX
6 Hays & Girls (;lub- Education Enhancement
76 So. Hay YMCA- Sunshine Co. (otay)
II CV Library- tV literacy learn
J6 Jobs for Youth- Iemo. EmDlovment
22 Senior Adult Srvcs.- Meals on Wheels
28 So. County Council on AoinQ- Shared Hso.
9 CV Police- PAL
25 So. Bay YMCA- Summe:>F Camp
q Assoc. for Retard. titizens- Voc. Rehab/Work Prooram
10 CV Police- Intervention Team
12 CV Police & Fire- CAST
27 So. Bay YMCA- Sunshine Co. Childcare
30 USIAA- Trainina and Ed. Center
31 Woodlawn Park Civic Leao.-COmm. Center
32 YMCA FamilY Stress- Child Ahuse Treatment Svcs.
13 Camm. Center for Disabled- CSeD South
18 I.tltheran Soc. Srvcs.- Project Hand
19 MAAC Project- Erneroeney Food
2 AIDS Foundation SD- SOC~ Serv & Case Manoment.
1 Adult Protective Services- So. Bay Adult Health Care
29 SBCS- Casa Nuestro.
33 YWCA Battered Women"s Svcs~- Men"s Counselino
7 Center for Women"s Studies & Srvcs.- Pl'oiect Safehous
lq fnlscooal Comm~ Srvcs~- Outreach Health Ed.
20 MAAC Project- Nosotl'os
5 Boys & Girls Club- Taroet Outreach
2q So. Bay YMCA- Pryde Prooram
3 AYSO- PlaYino Field
8 CV Connection- Day Care Center
17 Laubach Lit. Council/SD Lty.- CV I it. Team
f~tt/B'T .3
!Y9~~9q CnAG Socia I Servire ReQuests 1=>5' \
.....- J
~ n han re Hi oher Perform Promote Cost SeJf- fimely DUDlicative
Quality leveJ e>fficient indeoend. effective slltticientexoend. Srvcs. rUTAL
y 5 Y i> 5 i> 6 4 50
i> i> Y 6 5 5 " 4 47
(I. 5 " Y 6 6 .~ 6 .6 46.5
4.5 3 9 " 6 " 6 " 46.5
4.5 :> 9 6 6 6 6 6 46.5
9 3 9 6 " I 6 6 46
Y 3 9 6 5 I 6 6 45
Y 3 9 3 6 3 6 6 45
9 :> 7.5 6 I 6 6 6 44.5
9 3 9 5 5 I 6 6 44
9 5 6 4 :; 3 6 6 44
9 3 9 ? 6 3 6 6 44
6 5 6 6 6 .~ I> 6 44
9 ,~ 9 4 I> 1 6 i> 44
9 3 9 6 4 1 6 6 44
4.5 i> I> 6 i> 3 i> 6 Q3.S
i> 3 9 i> i> 1 6 6 43
9 i> 5 3 6 I 6 i> 42
4.5 5 6 6 5 2 6 6 39.5
6 I 6 6 i> I 6 6 38
6 3 6 6 3 2 I> 6 38
9 6 4.5 ,~ 3 2 3 6 36.5
4.5 2 4.5 6 5 ? 6 6 36
4.5 6 4.5 6 4 3 4 3 35
6 5 6 3 ,~ 2 6 3 34
4.5 3 6 5 I 3 6 4 32.5
6 ,1 6 5 ? ? 5 Z 31
.1.5 3 6 3 3 3 6 3 30.5
4.5 3 4.5 4 3 3 6 2 30
6 5 4 5 3 3 3 I 30
23 EosicooaJ Lomm. Srvcs.- So. Bay Alcohol & DruD Abuse NOT RATED
15 Hermandad Mexicana Nacional- Parkvillaoe Services NUT RATED
21 Salvatlon Army- Senior Nutrition NOT RATfD
w '''~;''\B\'' 3
p~. '2-
SOCIAL SERVICE FUNDING POLICY
This social service policy is designed to identify those projects and agencies
which can deliver important benefit to Chula Vista residents effectively and
efficiently. In addition to the use of the policy guidelines listed below,
the City Council will require .the submission of social service agencies'
expenses, income, and funding sources from the previous two years to aid in
the evaluation of funding proposals.
1. Social service projects must establish or maintain a-resource which would
enhance the quality of life of. the Chula Vista community.
2. Initial grants to social service projects must create a new level of
service for the clients of the requesting agency or must replace funding
sources for existing levels of service which have been removed through no
fault of the requesting agency.
3.
i r.
t i
Soci al service
demonstrated in
efficiently.
4. Preference will be given to those projects which instill in their clients
the resources to move beyond the need for ass is tance by that agency or
which allow their clients to avoid greater dependency on other forms of
social assistance.
grants will be
the past the
made only
capacity to
to agencies which
perform dil i gently
have
and
5. Preference will be given to those projects which are most cost effective
in the delivery of benefit. to low and moderate-income citizens of Chula
Vi s ta.
6.
Preference will be given to . those projects which
self-sufficient or would secure other forms of assistance
City Community Development Block ~rant assistance.
7. Social service grants will be made only to agencies and projects which
appear to have the capacity to expend those grant funds in a timely manner.
woul d become
as a resul t of
8. Preference will be given to those ptojects which do not duplicate an
eXisting service.
I
I ~_It
Minutes
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
E",t+IIJIT +
MI
Conference Rooms 2&3
Public Services Building
Wednesday, May 5, 1993
12:00 Noon
CALL TO ORDERIROLL CALL
PRESENT:
Chair Allen; Members Compton, Lopez, LoBue, Peter, ex-officio Patrick, Clark, Moore
ABSENT:
Members Tuchscher, Johnson, Davis, Maslak, ex-officio Sutherland,
STAFF:
Economic Development Manager Cheryl Dye, Community Development Specialist Daniel Rofoli
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - None submitted.
2. Presentation by San Diego Consortium & Private Industry Council (Brene Patrick)
Chair Allen introduced Ms. Patrick and noted that Ms. Patrick, Deborah Varner, and Charlie Clark would be giving
a brief presentation on the San Diego PIC and how the City and PIC can possibly work together to benefit from
the efforts of their programs.
Ms. Varner noted that the Department of Labor funds the State according to the current employment rate and funds
are distributed to service delivery areas. The San Diego Consortium Private Industry Council is a Service Delivery
Area for San Diego County. PIC provides job training and placement for low income individuals and laid-off
workers throughout the County. They operate under the Job Training and Partnership Act (JTP A) Guidelines. Ms.
Varner discussed the PIC's work with the City of San Diego and the two enterprise zones, and their youth programs
Member Lobue mentioned that the summer hiring program for youths was a big question in Washington with
Clinton and his economic stimulus package, but that didn't go down. He asked how that affected the PIC program.
Ms. Patrick responded that they originally were allocated almost $5 million for the program irregardless of the
stimulus package. The stimulus package would have allowed the PIC to get about $17.5 million total for San Diego
County. Her understanding is that legislation will be introduced next week, within the next 5 working days, that
will fund the summer Youth Program at half of the amount originally requested. So, the PIC would receive about
$9 million. That would allow the PIC to serve another 2,000 youths in the program. So, PIC will still be providing
the summer jobs; just not as many as they had hoped to be able to.
Ms. Varner added that there are two components to the program; a subsidized portion for low income youths who
work in public organizations such as the City and those who work with the private sector (unsubsidized) whose
employers eventually pay the full salaries and benefits for those positions. About 90 % of those jobs are paid at
minimum wage. Wages may be slightly higher for youth with more experience if they are going to lead a work
crew.
Councilman Moore asked about the relationship of the San Diego Enterprise Zones and Chula Vista employees.
Ms. Varner indicated she has placed Chula Vista residents in both the Otay mesa and Barrio Logan zones.
Mr. Ken Clark noted that Southwestern College has a contract with the PIC to trian displaced aerospace workers
under an Entrepreneur Training Program.
Mr. Charlie Clark was introduced and explained the aspects of the entrepreneurial training program and funding
by the Department of Defense, Office of Economic Adjustment and the State Department of Commerce. From June
of last year through December, the PIC interviewed 59 defense companies to find out what they were doing and
what they projected for employment. (Ms. Dye noted copy of that report has been distributed to Council and the
Commission. )
\~--\'\
Minutes, EDC
May 5, 1993
Page 2
r1.H.817 t-f
M. -z..
Mr. Charlie Clark also discussed the ucoming Phase 2 of the defense-related survey (starting September 93) and
invited Chula Vista to participate. The third phase will include a World Trade Center, Business Assistance Center
for High Tech and Incuhator to be funded by DOC. He also discussed San Diego's efforts with CALSTART.
Councilman Moore noted that the City's Environmental Manager would be interested in talking to Mr. Charlie
Clark.
Member Lopez responded to a question regarding the World Trade Center, stating it will connect international
resources and provide training and assistance. San Diego is requesting $1 million.
Chair Allen thanked Ms. Patrick for her presentation and asked Ms. Dye to introduce the new staff person from
Community Development.
Ms. Dye introduced Daniel Rofoli, a temporary Community Development Specialist I who would be working for
Ms. Dye on various economic development projects. She noted that Mr. Rofoli had come to the City from
Southwestern College, where he had worked with Ken Clark.
Chair Allen said there were two items that were not specifically outlined in the agenda that may be appropriate for
the EDC to take up. She said if there was no dissention, she would like to have these first in the agenda and discuss
them.
Chair Allen indicated that staff is applying for CDBG funds for two projects. The Mayor requested that
Commission reviews occur before Council acts on staff recommendations at the May 25 meeting. One is the
Biotech Zone and one is the border Environmental Commerce Zone. The EDC received information about both
projects in their packets, but Ms. Dye would give a brief talk about where they are and wbat's going on with those
two projects and then, as a Commission, she felt it appropriate to take position either to support their request for
funding under Community Development Block Grant Funds or not.
Ms. Dye reported that she had been providing staff support to both of these Council-initiated activities. One project
addresses a High Tech/Biozone created at EastLake Business Park. This is a very specific geographic area for
targeted industries that the City is trying to provide incentives to. She noted that Biotech is being spearheaded by
Councilwoman Shirley Horton but the entire Council has directed staff to pursue this. Councilman Bob Fox is
chairing the other Task Force, the Border Environmental Commerce Zone, and again, Council directed staff to
pursue this. Because of CDBG deadlines, these items were being presented to the EDC as "urgency items" for
discussion and possible action. Council requested that any input or recommendations from commissions be brought
back on the 25th.
Ms. Dye gave a brief overview of the Hightech/Biotech Zone. This Task Force represents both the Biotech
community and the City. The recommendations that have come forward at this point are that there be a Phase I
and Phase II to this project which would correspond directly to Phase I of the EastLake Business Park, an already
improved business park that has several firms located there and has some 30 acres remaining vacant. Phase II of
the EastLake Business Park is completely undeveloped, but approved for industrial adjacent 100 acres. The idea
is to implement some actions for the Phase I to get the program going, but on a longer term to implement the more
broad base actions for development of Phase II. She stated they are looking at doing an overall environmental
impact report. An EIR up front for the entire area that would cover the kinds of impacts that these businesses
would be anticipated to have. The idea is so that businesses could come in without having to do their own
environmental review. At the same time, zoning would be ready to go, there would be design guidelines, a
guaranteed 60-day turnaround and some guarantee that a water supply would be provided. The Task Force is also
looking at setting up a Council subcommittee that would take the place of any other advisory groups that these firms
would go through. The firms would g& straight to this Council subcommittee after having staff review from a
zoning perspective, and would not have to go to the Planning Commission or PAC's.
Ms. Dye continued that the Community Development Block Grant Funding is being requested is in the amount of
$100,000 which would go towards the EIR. Because this is still in a conceptual stage, staff is presenting to Council
that funding would be contingent upon some sort of acceptable agreement to the City between the City and
I~ _~O
e ..,...tH ~l r 't
~~~
Minutes, EDC
May 5, 1993
Page 3
EastLake. EastLake would have to come up with, among other things, matching funds. Staffs recommendation
is that $100,000 is the cap, but the City's contribution would not exceed 50% of the total ElR cost. Costs could
be as little as $100,000, but more realistically between $200,000-$400,000 for the EIR. Ms. Dye then went on to
explain how the CD BG program works and the City's allocation. She noted that this project would fall under the
15 % category for planning and administration.
Chair Allen noted that Member Tuchscher is on the Task Force and spoke on the project's behalf to Council.
Member Peter asked about evnironmental impacts. Ms. Dye responded tha the ElR would look at this, including
low level nuclear radiation.
Member Compton discussed the need for small business incentives.
Member Lopez asked about water and ms. Dye discussed EastLake's efforts to guarantee water supply.
Member LoBue stated that Mayor Golding has guaranteed Biomed all the water they need.
Member LoBue stated that he had to leave in a few of minutes and asked if the Commission could get a motion on
the floor.
Chair Allen asked Ms. Dye to quickly give her presentation on the second project.
Ms. Dye presented her second report, noting that the zone would include everything basically south of 94 to the
border between 1-5 and proposed State Route 125. The whole idea is to get something going to capitalzie on the
State and Federal's high interest in supporting evvnironmental technology and to do it at a local level so that the
City can go to the State and/or the Feds and say, "Look what we've got going. We're taking the lead, please
channel some of your monies in because we're already initiating this." A Joint Powers Authority of those agencies
mentioned would be formed to be the general policy making board for a zone that would provide incentives for
environmental businesses. Eligible businesses would include those who innovate environmental technology through
R&D or produce products as Councilman Moore discussed, that are designed to improve the environment, land,
water, air; or use processes that go beyond what is legally required. The JP A would also be a conduit for funds
if the governmental agency is needed to do that. The essence of the program is that the JP A would contract with
a non-profit entity. Non-profit being private sector individuals, each of whom would have a very specific expertise
in the environmental area or a lender or someone who brings something to this program to bring all the different
resources together to make it work. The non-profit would be responsible for making two things happen at a
minimum. One would be an environmental research technology center, very similar to what the PIC discussed
earlier. It would be a one stop center for networking all areas of expertise and business assistance relating to
environmental businesses. The other would be an incubator program again similar to the PIC's discussion but with
the difference being that it's geared exclusively towards environmental technologies which is a very specialized arena
into itself. Those programs are the real thrust.
Continuing her presentation, Ms Dye said the specific proposal is that CDBG funds are to provide seed money that
will be matched for an Environmental Zone Coordinator. The effort needs one person on a full-time basis to move
this forward; to form the JP A, to form the non-profit, to go after State legislation, to designate this by the State as
a Border Environmental Commerce Zone, to go after Federal Funds, and to go after private funds. The City is
being asked to make a commitment to fund this position to get the things going. The City has got to start;
somebody has to put the first food forward. The idea is to go after state legislation this year to designate the zone
and to later go for specific incentives. What really adds to the potential of this and to its attractiveness is that there
is a similar effort going on at Silicon Valley and one of their members is on the City's Task Force and they are
talking about linking up. This is important because political feedback has said a north/south pilot program would
be more saleable. In response to a question asked if the Chula Vista has talked to the other cities, Ms. Dye said
that there has been discussion at various levels and that the Mayor has spoken with each of this counterparts who
have expressed support
M (LoBue) that the Commission supports both the recommendations.
1'-:1.1
Minutes, EDC
May 5, 1993
Page 4
to( .. '~l" I.f
,~. ~
Member Compton stated he would offer a second to accept the proposal for the Biotech portion of the motion. He
asked that the proposals be separated.
Member LoBue agreed to the request.
Discussion ensued regarding the merits of having everything set for companies, fast-tracking, and an EIR that has
already been done. The money for the ElR would not be wasted because sooner or later business is going to come
and if you have a Master ErR the incentive is still there. The City could offer a 60-day turnaround.
Chair Allen said she would draft a letter, and would include in it that it is certainly in line with increasing the job
basis of the community, which is something we're supported all along; streamlining the process of the fast track
aspects; and lets Chula Vista take a leadership role as a business friendly city.
Chair Allen called for a vote.
Ms. Dye asked for clarification: if the EDC was endorsing the concept or endorsing the specific $100,000
application?
Chair Allen responded that the EDC was endorsing the application for funding.
The motion passed unanimously.
Chair Allen asked if there was a second for the next item. Ex-officio Clark seconded the item for discussion.
Member Lopez stated that part of this application to the EDA is what's called a High Resource Technology Center.
It does pretty much what you want to do here. He stated he wanted to make sure that it's coordinated if we want
to go for Federal funds. Councilman Moore noted that a City of San Siego staffer sat in on the Task Force
meetings. Mr. Lopez went on to explain that one of the things we have to define is where is the incubator is going
to be located because those are funds we can get from the Federal government. Where is it going to be located?
Ms. Dye responded that she wanted to note that the Task Force felt very strongly that in order for their concept
to be successful in terms of an incuhator, the incubator to be exclusively for environmental technology firms. She
said that that was not what San Diego was proposing. Member Lopez agreed that was true.
Chair Allen noted her concern that she didn't think it is really at a point that the City should be spending $100,000
for an Executive Director to be starting. She did not think they are there yet and was not going to support this.
She stated perhaps she was not familiar enough with this project; that she was familiar with the other one and has
been keeping up with what's going on with that. She was not comfortable with that.
Councilman Moore stated that San Diego city is involved. Chula Vista probably needs the big city as much as they
need the low income of the South Bay to make this a top drawer attraction for dedication of serious funds. He sees
San Diego as being a full-fledged partner.
Mr. Clark added that South County does have resources in hazardous materials handling and those types of
programs and based in South County and specifically Southwestern College. There are already a number of these
consultant types of environmental people working with Southwestern College and its easy to deliver them to this
type of program.
Member Peter asked if the BECZ and the Biotech zones were in conflict. Ms. Dye responded that they would, in
fact, be complimentary. The BECZ would encompass a large area and the biotech zone would be a business park
within the zone.
Member Compton questioned the financial commitment of the other cities that would be part of the BECZ.
Ii... 21.
;.....t\\P.>IT y..
r~ 5
Minutes, EDC
May 5, 1993
Page 5
Ms. Dye responded that because of timing issues as it relates to CDBG funds, formal commitments have not yet
been received. However, she indicated that discussions had occurred between the cities at the staff and elected
official levels. She also noted that Mayor Nader had personally contacted each of his counterparts who had given
verbal conceptual support.
In addition, she noted that the Task Force included the San Diego city's Enterprise Zone director, Mike Sullivan,
and Mike Jenkins.
Members Lopez and LoBue noted that this did not necessarily mean that San Diego city support had been thoroughly
communicated to all parties at this time.
Member Compton stated that he was uncomfortable recommending City funds without at least a signed letter of
intent from other participants or approval of the creation of the JP A.
Ms. Dye responded that the $100,00 request represented only half of the $200,000 that was required for the zone
coordinator and support services budget and that the request for funds was contingent upon receipt of matching
funds. She said the EDC could make its funding recommendation contingent upon anything the Commission wished,
such as San diego city funding participation. She said the proposal enabled Chula Vista to take a leadership role
and . step up to the plate. to get the process going for what is a visionary proposal.
Chair Allen indicated that she felt the request for funds was premature until more questions were answered and the
program was better defined.
Ms. Dye responded that defining all aspects of the zone would be a full time job and therefore there was a need
to get someone on board.
Chair Allen called for a vote.
The motion failed by the following vote:
A YES: Member LoBue
NOES: Chair Allen, Members Lopez, Compton, Peter
Due to time constraints, the Subcommittee and Liaison reports were tabled to the next meeting.
3. SUBCOMMITTEE REPORTS
A. Retention of Business
B. Permit Process Streamlining
C. International Airport
D. Joint Marketing Efforts
E. North American Free Trade Agreement
a. Discussion regarding N AFT A
F. Community Reinvestment Act
G. Special Events
H. BiolechlHigh Tech
I. Job Training
4. LIAISON REPORTS
A. Bayfront Task Force - William Tuchscher
B. Chamber Economic Development Committee - Mike Maslak
C. So. Co. Economic Development Council - Penoy Allen
D. Otay Valley Road Project Area Committee - Patty Davis
\ <1 - "2.:;
liI.g~yg~m"9l!.}i.j1i!9~1
lcr-'Z..~
~ ~ ft.-
=~- -:
~~~~
-:.,.- - --
~\H-IP.; rr s-
f';. ,
CllY OF
CHUlA VISTA
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
May 14, 1993
Mayor Tim Nader and Members of the Chula vista City Council
city of Chula vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Dear Mayor and Councilmembers:
Pursuant to your request, the Chula vista Economic Development
Commission has reviewed the Community Block Grant Fund (CDBG)
applications from the High Technology/ Biotechnology Task
Force and the Border Environmental Zone Task Force which have
been submitted for your consideration.
The commission is pleased to unanimously support the request
for funding from the High Technology/Biotechnology Task
Force. The development of the zone proposed by the task force
will provide several positive benefits to the City of Chula
vista. A High Tech/Biotech Zone will:
o Enhance the economic viability of the entire South
Bay;
o Increase the number of jobs available in the
community;
o Provide a positive incentive for businesses to move to
into the proposed zone; and
o Streamline the permitting process.
Moreover, the commission is of the opinion that the potential
of EastLake Development Company securing a guaranteed water
source in the zone represents a "not to be missed" opportunity
for the city.
The commission did not vote to support the request for funding
from the Border Environmental Zone Task Force. Concerns were
expressed by the commissioners regarding the lack of
accountability of the position which the funds would create,
and the current lack of evidence of commitment from other
jurisdictions which would be included in the proposed
environmental zone. (This concern would clearly be addressed
if funding were made contingent upon the commitment of the
other jurisdictions involved.)
11- ;1.5'
276 FOURTH AVENUElCHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 91910/(619) 691-5047
Economic Development
Recommendations re:
May 14, 1993
Page Two
commission
CDBG Funds
&"'ffl&lT 5
1>1 -V
It was the commissioners belief that due to the limited amount
of information presented to us, we could not affirmatively
support the request at this time. However, we would be
pleased to reconsider our position on the Border Environmental
Zone Task Force request when more information becomes
available.
sincerely,
~
Penny
Chair
1 '1- 2.(..
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE 1993-94 COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) BUDGET AND
AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL OF THE CDBG APPLICATION,
FINAL STATEMENT, AND CERTIFICATIONS TO THE U. S.
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
The City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby resolve
as follows:
WHEREAS, the City of Chula vista will receive a 1993-94
community Development Block Grant entitlement of $ 1,664,000 and
current and estimated program income of approximately $299,670;
and,
WHEREAS, the City of Chula vista has $268,288 of
CDBG funds available for reallocation and $74,414
section 108 loan funds; and,
prior year
of unused
WHEREAS, the City has followed its citizen Participation
Plan and held a public hearing on housing and community
development needs on May 4 and 11, 1993; and,
WHEREAS, the City has prepared the 1993-96 Community
Development Plan and has determined that all of the proposed
activities are consistent with said Plan and meet the CDBG
national objectives to benefit primarily low-income households or
aid in the prevention of slums and blight; and,
WHEREAS, the City has determined that it is necessary and
appropriate to fund special activities by certain subrecipients
to implement neighborhood revitalization and community economic
development projects in order to meet the goals and objectives of
the Community Development Plan; and,
WHEREAS, the city has prepared the 1993-94 Community
Development Block Grant Final Statement and associated documents.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that the City Council of the
City of Chula vista approves the proposed 1993-94 Community
Development Block Grant program and CDBG budget, a copy of which
is attached hereto and incorporated herein.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the City of
Chula vista approves the 1993-96 Community Development Plan, a
copy of which is attached hereto and incorporated herein.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the City Council of the city of
Chula vista approves the reallocation of CDBG funds from
completed and cancelled projects to eligible new projects
according to the Reallocation List, a copy of which is attached
hereto and incorporated herein.
""'''-7
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Community Development
Director is authorized to transmit the CDBG Application, Final
statement , and certifications to the U.S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development (HUD).
Pres~nted bY~
CL ~0'-0 /
Chris Salomone
Community Development Director
[ Xv~ ~I
Bruce M. Boogaqr
City Attorney
} ~ - 7-f
1993-94 to 1995-96 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN
The City of Chula vista will utilize Community Development
Block Grant (CDBG) funds primarily to benefit low and
moderate-income persons based on the needs, goals, and
objectives established in this Community Development Plan.
A minimum of 70% of the funding will be utilized for this
purpose.
Needs
The city has identified the following Community Development
needs:
1. To revitalize and improve deteriorating neighborhoods
2. To provide adequate public facilities throughout the
community
3. To expand economic opportunities
4. To preserve, improve, and increase the supply of
affordable housing
5. To enhance the provision of human services
Goals
The City shall:
1. Plan, design, and construct capital improvements in
deteriorating neighborhoods.
2. Construct public facilities, such as parks, libraries,
and community centers in neighborhoods deficient in such
facilities.
3. Assist in the provision of human services to senior
citizens, youth, and families in need.
3. Create job opportunities and foster small business
development.
4. Promote decent and affordable housing for all residents
and prevent housing discrimination
11- 2.1
Ob;ectives
1. Provide assistance to organizations serving the varied
needs of senior citizens, including housing, nutrition,
health, transportation, and related services.
2. Provide assistance to organizations serving the varied
needs of youth and their families, including prevention and
counseling programs for substance abuse, child abuse, and
juvenile delinquency.
3. Provide assistance to organizations which provide
counseling and support to adults recovering from substance
abuse or involved in domestic violence.
4. Provide assistance to organizations which provide basic
needs assistance and/or assist people who homeless,
unemployed, or disabled to become self-sufficient.
5. Provide assistance to organizations which promote adult
literacy.
6. Construct public improvements to alleviate pubic
hazards and revitalize deteriorating neighborhoods,
including, street, drainage, and lighting improvements.
7. Construct public improvements to enhance the quality of
life for residents, including parks, community centers,
libraries, and other public facilities.
8. Promote small businesses and the creation of jobs
through planning studies, infrastructure improvements,
technical assistance, and financial programs.
9. Provide assistance to neighborhood and community based
organizations to initiate neighborhood revitalization,
economic development, and affordable housing programs.
10. Furnish fair housing information, counseling, and
mediation services.
I r,. 30
REALLOCATION LIST
The total amount of funds to be reallocated from completed and cancelled projects is $268,288.
In addition, $74,714 of unused Section 108 loan funds and $199,670 of unallocated program
income are available. These funds, which total $542,672, shall be reallocated to the following
projects:
Section 108 loan repayment
Senior Home Repair Program
Otay Neighborhood Rev. Program
$277,907
20,000
244.765
$542,672
Funds to be reallocated come from the CDBG Housing Rehabilitation Program Income account
($199,670) and the following projects accounts:
Norman Park Senior Center
630-6300-PRII0A
630-6300- PR 111
635-6350-PRIIO
646-6460-PRII0
$ 74,713.70
10.00
81.83
896.42
Housing Rehabilitation Revolving Loan Fund
632-6320
$ 199,670.00
Fourth/Orange Land Acquisition
640-6400-PRI43
634-6340-PRI43
Economic Development Planning Studies
632-6320-BG201
647-6471-BG201
$ 13,612.93
11,539.24
$ 1,837.44
1,600.00
$ 15,445.00
7,015.00
$ 736.57
111.49
50.00
99,000.00
$ 500.00
779.90
8,107.45
Economic Development Revolving Fund
633-6330-BG201
635-6350-BG201
Administration
634-6340- BG218
644-6441-BG218
646-6461-BG218
648-6481-BG218
Fair Housing Program
644-6441-BG219
646-6461-BG219
647-6471-BG219
1,-3}
Telegraph Canyon Drainage
631-6310-BG158
Woodlawn Park
635-6350-BG201
MAAC Project Otay Center Parking
644-6440-PRI44
Neighborhood Revitalization Program
644-6441-BG235
Murals Program
646-6461-BG244
MAAC Project Office Building
647-6471-BGI0l
Otay Park Restroom Renovation
647-6470-PRI52
1 ~,. 3 2,...
$ 4,883.17
$ 18.89
$ 373.32
$ 189.43
$ 15,500.00
$ 50,000.00
$ 36,000.00
/1 I (,
May 18, 1993
MEMO TO:
Honorable Mayor & City Council
Joyce Hughes, Secretary (Temporary) ~~
FROM:
SUBJECT:
MAAC PROJECT
Maritza Garcia, MAAC Project (425-9196), called regarding staff recommendations for
CDBG funds as it pertains to MAAC.
She would like the Council to reconsider the value of her proposal working with Senior
Citizens and reward MAAC at least a portion of the funds.
J~~3)
1993-94 CDBG Approved Budget
TOTAL REVENUES
CDBG Entitlement
Current Program Income
Reallocation- unused from prior years
Section 108 Loan- unused funds
Estimated Program Income for 1993-94
TOTAL EXPENDITURES
Staff Administration
High Tech/Biotech Zone EIR
Border Environmental Zone Plan
Fair Housing Program
C.V. Human Services Council
Parks&Rec Human Services Coordinator
Otay Committee
Total Administration and Planning
Total Social Services
City CIP
Section 108 Loan Repayment
Otay Neighborhood Rev. Program
South Chula Vista Library- construction
Parkway Complex Renovation
ADA Modifications
Otay Park Renovation
ADA Curb Cuts
Main Library- Reroof
Total City CIP
Community Projects
B&H Community Appearance Program
SBCS Community Dev. Program (Housing)
SBCS Grafitti Eradication
C.V. Elem. School Dist.- Playgrounds
Home Repair for Seniors
Border Environmental Zone CDC
Total Community Projects
$2.306.672
$1. 664,000
$199,670
$268,288
$74,714
$100,000
$2,306,658
$150,000
$100,000
$50,000
$29,000
$24,000
$15,000
$5,000
$373,000
$255,000
$277 ,907
$268,800
$378,196
$182,655
$36,000
$137,800
$50,000
$120,700
$1. 452,058
$15,000
$48,000
$33,600
$60,000
$20,000
$50,000
$226,600
/9./'33
1993-94 CDBG SOCIAL SERVICE AGENCIES APPROVED BUDGET
PrOl!raIll
Adult Protective Services
AIDS Foundation San Diego
Boys and Girls (Educ. Enhancement)
Center for Women's Studies & Services
Chula Vista Police--PAL
Chula Vista Police--Intervention
Chula Vista Library--Literacy Team
Chula Vista Police/Fire--CAST
Community Service Center for Disabled
Episcopal Com. Svcs.(Outreach Health)
Jobs for Youth
L.S.S. Project Hand Emergency
MAAC Project (Emergency Food)
Senior Adult Services Meals on Wheels
YMCA Sunshine Co. (Otay site)
YMCA Summer Day Camp
YMCA Sunshine Company Chi1dcare
SCCOA Shared Housing
SBCS Casa Nuestra Youth Shelter
Woodlawn Park Community Center
YMCA Family Stress Center
YWCA Battered Women's Services
$ 9,000
4,000
10,000
5,000
14,000
15,000
40,900
6,000
9,000
10,000
3,100
14,000
7,500
7,500
7,000
6,000
10,000
15,000
15,000
22,000
20,000
5.000
$ 255,000
)1~J1
APPENDIX:
Item 19 CDBG: Background; Program
Recommendations; and Social service Projects.
) 7 - 3.3
Summary;
Funding
ITEM TITLE:
PUBLIC HEARING:
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND:
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
ON HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT NEEDS:
For 1993-94 the City of Chula Vista will receive a CDBG
entitlement of $1,664,000. The City estimates that $584,212 of
other CDBG program income will also be available. The City
proposes to use these funds for public facilities and improvements,
social services, fair housing, and other community needs. These
activities will primarily benefit low and moderate income families,
with a minimum of 70 percent of the funds targeted to benefit low-
income households.
The following Community Development Objectives are proposed:
[1] Provide assistance to organizations serving the varied needs of
senior citizens and youth and their families;
[2] Provide assistance to organizations providing counseling to
adults recovering from substance abuse or involved in domestic
violence, basic needs assistance to homeless or disabled persons,
and tutoring to adults who are illiterate;
[3] Construct public improvements and facilities;
[4] Promote small businesses and job creation;
[5] Provide assistance to community organizations for
neighborhood revitalization and affordable housing;
[6] Furnish fair housing information and counseling services.
Community Development Director ~
City Manager ;r
v (4/5ths Vote: Yes No _XJ
The City of Chula Vista will receive $1,664,000 in CDBG entitlement funds and anticipates
receiving other program income of about $584,212 from CDBG Housing Rehabilitation,
reallocation and Section 108 funds. The 1993-94 CDBG Notebook contains the Program
Summary, Funding Recommendations, and Project Descriptions. Page references in this report
are to specific pages in the CDBG Notebook.
This public hearing provides an opportunity for citizens to comment on how CDBG funds can
be allocated to meet the City's housing and community needs. No staff recommendations are
being made at this time and the City Council is not expected to take any action on the proposed
budget other than to give desired direction. After thorough consideration of public comment,
staff will prepare an additional report presenting funding recommendations for Council
deliberation and action at the May 18, 1993 meeting.
/J-J
Item --f:l:6 J.
Pag~ 2, Meeting Date ~ '; ')
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council conduct a public hearing on housing and
community development needs and accept the staff report on the 1993-94 CDBG program, and
direct staff to return on May 18, 1993 with the funding recommendation report.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: The Commission on Aging, Human
Relations Commission, and Youth Commission have reviewed the social service funding requests
and have made funding recommendations (see page 13). The Housing Advisory Committee has
reviewed the three housing-related proposals, SBCS Community Development Program, B&H
Community Appearance Program and the Fair Housing Program, and made recommendations
for funding (no specific dollar amount). The Childcare Commission lacked a quorum at their
April 16, 1992 meeting and was unable to make any recommendations this year.
DISCUSSION:
Introduction: Proposed Budl!et
For the 1993-94 CDBG program, the City of Chula Vista has total estimated revenue of
$2,248,212. This includes the annual entitlement ($1,664,000), existing and anticipated program
income funds from housing rehabilitation loans ($299,670), reallocation funds from prior City-
funded projects either completed or cancelled ($209,828), and Section 108 funds ($74,714). The
total amount of funding requested, which includes all funding requests from community
organizations, is summarized as follows:
Administration and Planninf!
Social Services Funding
Section 108 Loan Repayment
Capital Imorovement Proiects
Community Proiects
Total of All Requests
(33 requests)
(Norman Park)
(9 projects)
(7 requests)
$ 342,000
$ 616,420
$ 275,000
$ 1,417,224
$ 767.286
$ 3,417,930
The total amount of funding requested exceeds the total amount of CDBG revenue by about
$806,205. Program regulations place a 15 percent cap on social service funding, which will
limit the social services allocation to about $250,000; this is $366,420 less than the total amount
requested. A detailed preliminary 1993-94 CDBG program budget is in the Notebook (page I).
In order to be eligible for funding, a project or service must address at least one of the CDBG
national objectives which are: I) Benefit primarily low and moderate-income families, 2) Aid
in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight, or 3) Meet other community needs having
a particular urgency.
The City has previously adopted the 1990-91 to 1992-93 Community Development Plan (see
pages 2 and 3). This Plan outlines the City's specific community development goals and
objectives for the CDBG program and provides a guide for making allocations.
In order to fund four of the Community Project proposals (Chula Vista Building and Housing
Community Appearance Program, SBCS Graffiti Eradication, SBCS Community Development
/:2. -2-
Item / V
Page 3, Meeting Date WI ;,
Corp. and the Border Environmental Commerce Zone (BECZ) Coordinator the City will need
to make a finding that these activities are necessary and appropriate in order to meet the goals
and objectives of the City's Community Development Plan.
Social Service Fundin!!: Reouests
The City received over 33 requests for social services funding from non-profit community
organizations, totaling over $616,000. All of the requests for funding are included in the
Notebook under the Social Services Projects section and a summary is found on pages 14.
For 1993-94, the City may allocate up to $250,000 for social service organization based
upon 15 percent of the entitlement only. Staff did not include other CDBG funds (Program
Income, Reallocation and Section 108) in the 15 percent cap for social services as these
funds are not available every year. Staff feels that it would be non-productive to have a
significantly-higher social service allocation this year and then have to cut back on it in
subsequent years.
All 33 of the funding requests from social service organizations are CDBG-eligible as they
meet the national objective to primarily benefit low-income families. The Commission on
Aging, Human Relations Commission, and Youth Commission have reviewed the social
service funding requests and have made their recommendations (see page 11). Staff has
prepared a Proposal Comparison Table for the Commissions and Council to use in
evaluating the proposals (see inside front cover).
As the requests for CDBG funding from community organizations increases from one year
to the next, the funding decisions become more difficult. As a general policy, the City has
sought to discourage dependence on CDBG funding and to encourage seed funding for new
programs, especially those types of services listed under the Social Service Plan. These
are: 1) Alcohol and Drug Abuse; 2) Child Care and Latchkey Programs; 3) Child and
Spousal Abuse/Domestic Violence. A breakdown showing new and previously-funded
programs is attached (see page 12).
Communitv Proiects Summarv
The City received several proposals from neighborhood-based organizations and the Chula
Vista Elementary School District. They have been grouped under the category of
"Community Projects". Staff has determined that these proposals are eligible for CDBG
funding, will primarily benefit low-income households, and are not subject to the 15
percent social services cap.
The Community Project requests total $667,286 and include the following types of
activities: 1) neighborhood revitalization; 2) affordable housing development; 3) capital
improvements for non-profit community facilities; and 4) economic development. All of
the requests for funding are included in the Notebook under the Community Projects
section and are summarized as follows:
/J- -' 3
Item /!--
C<1
Page 4, Meeting Date t<j'-c'-/ - i J
. Neighborhood Revitalization
Community Appearance Program
$ 36,000
In cooperation with local neighborhood groups, the Building and Housing Dept.
proposes to continue their neighborhood beautification campaigns. The funding
requested will pay for staff coordination, dumpsters and equipment.
Graffiti Eradication
$ 43,657
South Bay Community Services (SBCS), in partnership with the Chula Vista Police
Department, is requesting funds to continue their community effort to eradicate
graffiti painted on private businesses and residences. Youth offenders and community
volunteers provide the labor. Funds are requested for the Program Coordinator
position.
Home Repairs for Seniors
$ 20,000
This project was already approved by City Council and is being included for
informational purposes only. It is a 16 month contract with Lutheran Social
Services to provide health and safety repairs to seniors.
. Affordable Housing Develooment
SBCS Community Development Corporation
$ 52,000
South Bay Community Services (SBCS) is requesting funding to continue their
Community Development program. Current projects include the Emergency Housing
and Transitional Housing Projects at 17 and 31 Fourth Ave, respectively, the
Homebuyer Education Project, and the Affordable Apartment Referral Guide.
. Caoital Improvement for Non-profit Community Facilities
Chula Vista Elementary School District-Playgrounds
$ 125,000
The School District is requesting funds to improve playgrounds at five elementary
school sites: Vista Square, Harborside, Feaster, Mueller, and Otay. These
playgrounds will be open for community use after school hours and on weekends.
/1 -1
Item -L4-, /
Page 5, Meeting Date Cif!dlil3
. Economic Development
--Border Environmental Commerce Zone (BECZ) Coordinator
$ 100,000
Funds are to provide seed money to hire a coordinator to implement the BECZ
Program. The purpose of BECZ is to create a border-oriented, state-designated
incentive zone which offers special incentives and assistance to environmentally sound
businesses.
Capital Imorovement Proiect Summary
The 10 proposed capital improvement projects total $1,692,224. In addition, the City must
continue repayment of the Section 108 loan for the Norman Park Senior Center Renovation
($275,000). All of the CIP detail sheets are included in the Notebook under the City
Capital Improvement Projects section and are summarized as follows:
Neighborhood Revitalization Program
$ 273,800
This proposal is for design and construction of missing public improvements in Gtay.
This is the Third phase of improvements, which includes sidewalks, curbs, gutters,
and street lights. The Gtay Committee recommends this proposal as the top priority
for their neighborhood.
South Chula Vista Library
$ 378,196
This allocation is necessary to ensure that construction of the South Chula Vista
"Library can begin this fall. The slowdown in construction activity has meant that
revenues to the Library DIF (a primary source of funds for the construction) are
temporarily decreased from what staff had originally projected. Also, since Library
DIF Funds are received over many, m~ny years, part of the funding from this source
may not be accumulated in time for the construction of this project and Block Grant
Funds over the next two-three years may be necessary to complete the funding of this
library .
Parkway Complex Renovation - Phase I
$ 288,073
This project will provide for renovation of the gymnasium and pool restroom/dressing
rooms including heating, ventilation and plumbing.
ADA Modifications
$ 36,000
This project will provide for modification to City facilities as required by the
Americans with Disabilities Act making them accessible to individuals with
disabilities. This includes signage, doors, and public access routes.
/)~j
Item ~. I
Page 6, Meeting Date ~/q 3
Otay Park Renovation
$ 172,800
Funds are for a Joint Planning Agreement with the Chula Vista Elementary School
District to develop adjoining school grounds as an addition to the neighborhood park.
This will include new irrigation, play apparatus, picnic shelter, sport fields,
restrooms, landscaping, lighting, community stage, and running paths. The project
contributes to the Neighborhood Revitalization Program efforts in the Otay
Community.
ADA Curb Cuts Annual Program
$ 50,000
This project will provide for the construction of concrete wheelchair ramps at an
estimated 47 locations throughout the city.
Fourth Ave., Del Rey High School/Orange Avenue
$ 67,655
Funds will go to widen Fourth Avenue to accommodate a four-lane roadway with
bike lanes, curb, gutter, sidewalk, raised medians and driveways on both sides of the
street.
Nature Interpretive Center Road Surfacing
$ 30,000
Funds will be used to install AIC pavement on Gunpowder Point Drive from Bay
Boulevard to a point approximately 700 feet west of Bay Boulevard.
Main Library Re-Roof
$ 120,700
Funds will be used to remove and replace "built up" roof areas approximately 20
years old.
Plannine: and Fair Housine: Proiect Summary
The proposed budget for 1993-94 includes $165,000 for program administration and staff
costs. These administrative costs represent less than 10 percent of the total budget and
includes staff costs for coordination, accounting, monitoring sub-recipients, environmental
review, and reporting requirements.
The City has received six (6) requests for funding which are eligible planning and
administrative activities; these requests for funding total $177,000. The requests for
funding from the S.D. Fair Housing Council, Chula Vista Human Services Committee and
other applicants are included in the Notebook and are summarized as follows:
/J -6
Item /2 /
Page 7, Meeting Date tJ.o,lt'i/ / if3
Chula Vista Fair Housing Program
$ 29,000
CDBG regulations require the City to undertake proactive Fair Housing activities.
With assistance from Resident Relations and the Chicano Federation, the San Diego
Fair Housing Council will provide a comprehensive fair housing program in Chula
Vista. Their proposed activities include education and outreach, a tenant-landlord
hotline, follow-up on discrimination complaints, and fair housing assessments. This
program is designed to comply with HUD requirements.
Chula Vista Human Service Council
$ 25,000
The Human Services Council builds coalitions among Chula Vista area social service
providers in order to bring more funding for needed services into the South Bay. 1;he
funds are requested to hire a part-time coordinator. $4,000 of these monies were
funded out of the general fund in prior years.
Otay Committee
$ 5,000
The Otay Committee has requested $5,000 in funding to continue volunteer
community revitalization and beautification efforts, in conjunction with the
Neighborhood Revitalization Program (NRP). Committee activities include
tree-planting, a Community Fair, quarterly newsletter, and neighborhood clean-up
campaIgn.
High Tech/Biotech Zone (ErR)
$ 100,000
These funds are requested to partially fund an up-front "master" Program ErR for
EastLake's Phase II Business Center. The program's scope and costs are not
finalized. These funds are intended to match funds from Eastlake Development
Company.
Parks and Rec. Human Services Coordinator
$ 15,000
This coordinator facilitates the provision of social services and coordinates information
and referral at the Norman Park Senior Center.
Regional Task Force on Homeless
$ 3,000
This grant will assist the task force with important regional reports and special studies,
which are regularly incorporated into local documents such as the Housing Element
and grant proposals for federal and state funding.
/2- 7
Item --1b- /
Page 8, Meeting Date ~(L) 3
Reallocation of Funds from Comoleted and Cancelled Proiects
Several completed and cancelled projects have balances remaining. These funds should be
reallocated to other CDBG eligible projects, preferably to projects in which the funds will
be expended within the next fiscal year. The total amount of funds to be reallocated is
$284,542. Funds to be reallocated come from the following projects which includes the
unused Section 108 loan funds:
Norman Park Senior Center
630-6300-PR110A
630-6300-PR 111
635-6350-PR 110
646-6460-PR 110
$ 74.713.70
10.00
81.83
896.42
$ 13.612.93
11,539.24
$ 1,837.44
1,600.00
$ 736.57
111.49
50.00
99,000.00
$ 500.00
779.90
8,107.45
$ 4,883.17
$ 18.89
$ 373.32
$ 189.43
$ 15,500.00
$ 50,000.00
Fourth/Orange land Acquisition
640-6400-PR 143
634-6340-PR 143
Economic Development Revolving Fund
633-6330-8G 20 1
635-6350-8G201
Administration
634-6340-8G218
644-6441-8G218
646-6461-8G218
648-6481-8G218
Fair Housing Program
644-644 1-8G 21 9
646-6461-8G219
647-6471-8G219
Telegraph Canyon Drainage
631-6310-8G158
Woodlawn Park
635-6350-8G201
MAAC Project Otay Center Parking
644-6440-PR 144
Neighborhood Revitalization Program
644-6441-8G235
Murals Program
646-6461-8G244
MAAC Project Office 8uilding
647-6471-8G101
/c2 - f
Item /L i)
Page 9, Meeting Date~/,!3
FlSCAL IMPACT: The City will receive $1,664,000 in CDBG entitlement funds and $584,212
in other CDBG program income. The 15 percent cap on social services funding will limit the
social services allocation to a maximum of $250,000, based on the entitlement amount. In
addition, the City is obligated to continue repaying the Section 108 loan over the next 2 years;
the total payment for 1993-94 is $275,000.
[C,IWP51 ICOUNClLIll3SICDBGFY93 .113)
/l-9
TInS PAGE BlANK
/ J-/{)
City of Chula Vista
1993-94 Community Development Block Grant Program
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. PROGRAM SUMMARY
Preliminary 1993-94 Budget Summary ................................ 1
1990-93 Community Development Plan. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .2
Community Projects Summary ..................................... 4
Capital Improvement Project Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Planning and Fair Housing Project Summary ............................ 8
CDBG Budget Comparison (1992-93 with 1993-94) ........................ 9
II. FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS
Social Service Funding Recommendations ............................. 11
Project List by New and Previously Funded . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
Project List by Targeted Population ........................ . . . . . . . . . 13
Social Service Project Summary ................................... 14
Commission on Aging - Minutes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24
Human Relations Commission - Minutes ............... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30
Youth Commission - Minutes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 32
(No Childcare Commission Minutes)
Social Service Funding Policy .................................... 37
Social Service Plan Recommendations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 40
III. Social Service Projects
The proposals are numbered from 1-33 and are listed on the orange, tabbed page at the front of
Section III.
IV. Capital Improvement/Community Projects
The proposals are "lettered" from A-Wand are listed on the lavender, tabbed page at the front
of Section IV. This section also includes the p,roposals from the Fair Housing Council of San
Diego, the Chula Vista Human Services Council and the Regional Task Force on Homeless.
1
1993-94 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT BUDGET
Preliminary Budget (includes all proposed projects)
REVENUES
COBG Entitlement
Current Program Income
Reallocation- unused from prior years
Section 108 Loan- unused funds
Estimated Program Income for 1993-94
EXPENDITURES
Staff Administration
Biotech Zone EIR
Fair Housing Program
C.V. Human Services Council
Parks&Rec Human Services Coordinator
Otay Conunittee
Regional Task Force on Homeless
Total Administration and Planning *
Total Social Services **
City CIP
Section 108 Loan Repayment ***
Otay Neighborhood Rev. Program
South Chula Vista Library- construction
Parkway Complex Renovation
ADA Modifications
otay Park Renovation
ADA Curb Cuts
Fourth Ave., Del Rey H.S. to Orange Ave
Main Library- Reroof
NIC Road Surfacing
Total city CIP
Community Projects
B&H Community Appearance Program
SBCS Community Dev. Program (Housing)
SBCS Grafitti Eradication
c.v. Elem. School Dist.- Playgrounds
Home Repair for Seniors
YMCA Aquatics Facility
sacs Short-term Housing Facility
Border Environmental Zone Coord.
Total Community Projects
$2,248,212
$1,664,000
$199,670
$209,828
$74,714
$100,000
$3,054,417
$165,000
$100,000
$29,000
$25,000
$15,000
$5,000
$3,000
$342,000
$250,000
$277,907
$273,800
$378,196
$288,073
$36,000
$172,800
$50,000
$67,655
$120,700
$30,000
$1,695,131
$27,000
$57,025
$38,261
$125,000
$20,000
$250,000
$150,000
$100,000
$767,286
* Planning/Admin Cap = .20 x (entitlement + program income]
** Social Services Cap = .15 x (entitlement + program income]
$250,000 allocation is .15 x entitlement only
*** 1993-94 is 2nd year of 3-year loan repayment period
Proposed Expenditures - Total Revenue =
Page - 1
($806,205)
SOCIAL SERVICE FUNDING REQUESTS
IJraanization
Adult Protective Services
AIDS Foundation San Dieao
American Youth Soccer Organization
Assoc. for Retarded Citizens
Boys & Girls Club of C.V.
Boys & Girls Club of Chula Vista
Center for Women's Studies & Svcs
Chula Vista Connectlon
Chula Vista Police Dept.
Chula Vista Police Dept.
City of C.V. Library
City of C.V. Police and Fire Depts.
Community Service Cntr. for Disabled
~piscopal Community Services
Episcopal Community Servlces
Hermandad Mexicana Ncnl Lea. Ctr.
Jobs for Youth
Laubach Lit. Council/SD Cty., Inc.
Lutheran Soclal Svcs
r1AAC Pr01ect
MAAC Proiect Health Srvcs. Div.
Salvatlon Army
Senlor Adult Servlres
So. Bay Family YMCA
So. Bay Family YMCA
So. Bay Family YMCA
So. Bay Family YMCA
So. County Council on Aaina
South Bay Community Svcs
U.S. Institute of Amateur Athletics
Woodlawn Park Civic LeaQue
YMCA Family Stress Center
YWCA Battered Women's Svcs
ProQram
So. Bay Adult Health Care Cntr.
Soc. Srvcs. & Case MnQmt. Expansion
C.V. HS playinq field renovation
Vocnl. Rehab./Work Activity ProQram
Target Outreach
Education Enhancement ProQram
Project Safehouse/Raoe Crisis Cntr.
DayCare Center
Police Activities LeaQue
Intervention leam
Chula Vlsta Literacy Team
Citizens Adversity Suoport leam
CSCD South
Outreach Health Education
So. Bay Alcohol & VruQ Abuse Srvcs.
ParkvillaQe Servlces Proiert
Temporary Employment
Chula Vlsta Ll teracy I eam
Pr01ect Hand EmerQency Asslstanre
EmerQency Food ProQram
Nosotros
Senior Nutri tion l:ntr.
Meals on Wheels
PrYde Proaram
Sunshine Co. Childcare (Otay Site)
Summer Day Camp
Sunshine Co. Childcare
Shared HousinQ
Casa Nuestra
TraininQ & Education Cntr.
Woodlawn Park Community Center
Child Abuse I reatment Svcs
Men's Counseling
Reauest
$12.000
$10.000
$7.070
$15.000
$2q .950
$15.721
$10.000
$20.000
$5.000
$25.000
$Q3.190
$15.000
$LLOOO
$20,000
$:i5.000
$:\0.000
$,l. 100
$1.5()O
$(,1) . 000
10.0()0
$20.000
$17.000
$15.000
$:36.727
$8. 8:~5
$7.00()
$Qq . 27'1
$15.0()0
$25.000
$20. qOO
$31.000
$22.400
$10.000
1990-91 to 1992-93 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT PLAN
The City of Chula vista will utilize Community Development
Block Grant (CDBG) funds primarily to benefit low and
moderate-income persons based on the needs, goals, and
objectives established in this Community Development Plan.
A minimum of 70% of the funding will be utilized for this
purpose.
Needs
The city has identified the following community Development
needs:
1. To revitalize and improve deteriorating neighborhoods
2. To provide adequate public facilities throughout the
community
3. To expand economic opportunifies
4. To preserve, improve, and increase the supply of
affordable housing
5. To enhance the provision of human services
Goals
The city shall:
1. Plan, design, and construct capital improvements in
deteriorating neighborhoods.
2. Construct public facilities, such as parks, libraries,
and community centers in neighborhoods deficient in such
facilities.
3. Assist in the provision of human services to senior
citizens, youth, and families in need.
3. Create job opportunities and foster small business
development.
4. Promote decent and affordable housing for all residents
and prevent housing discrimination
. ).
Objectives
1. Provide assistance to organizations serving the varied
needs of senior citizens, including housing, nutrition,
health, transportation, and related services.
2. Provide assistance to organizations serving the varied
needs of youth and their families, including prevention and
counseling programs for substance abuse, child abuse, and
juvenile delinquency.
3. Provide assistance to organizations which provide
counseling and support to adults recovering from substance
abuse or involved in domestic violence.
4. Provide assistance to organizations which provide basic
needs assistance and/or assist people who homeless,
unemployed, or disabled to become self-sufficient.
5. Provide assistance to organizations which promote adult
literacy.
6. Construct public improvements to alleviate pubic
hazards and revitalize deteriorating neighborhoods,
including, street, drainage, and lighting improvements.
7. Construct public improvements to enhance the quality of
life for residents, including parks, community centers,
libraries, and other public facilities.
8. Promote small businesses and the creation of jobs
through planning studies, infrastructure improvements,
technical assistance, and financial programs.
9. Provide assistance to neighborhood and community based
organization to initiate neighborhood revitalization
. '
econom1C development, and affordable housing programs.
10. Furnish fair housing information, counseling, and
mediation services.
~- ')
Community Proiects Summary
Neighborhood Revitalization
Community Appearance Program
$ 36,000
In cooperation with local neighborhood groups, the Building and Housing Dept.
proposes to continue their neighborhood beautification campaigns. The funding
requested will pay for staff coordination, dumpsters and equipment.
Graffiti Eradication
$ 43,657
South Bay Community Services (SBCS), in partnership with the Chula Vista
Police Department, is requesting funds to continue their community effort to
eradicate graffiti painted on private businesses and residences. Youth offenders
and community volunteers provide the labor. Funds are requested for the
Program Coordinator position.
Home Repairs for Seniors
$ 20,000
This project was already approved by City Council and is being included for
informational purposes only. It is a 16 month contract with Lutheran Social
Services to provide health and safety repairs to seniors. This project will also
utilize funds reallocated from the MAAC Project.
Affordable Housin~ Development
SBCS Community Development Corporation
$ 52,000
South Bay Community Services (SBCS) is requesting funding to continue their
Community Development program. Current projects include the Emergency
Housing and Transitional Housing Projects at 17 and 31 Fourth Ave, respectively,
the Homebuyer Education Project, and the Affordable Apartment Referral Guide.
Capital Improvement for Non-profit Community Facilities
Chula Vista Elementary School District-Playgrounds
$ 125,000
The School District is requesting funds to improve playgrounds at five elementary
school sites: Vista Square, Harborside, Feaster, Mueller, and Otay. These
playgrounds will be open for community use after school hours and on weekends.
y
Economic DeveloDment
--Border Environmental Commerce Zone (BECZ) Coordinator
$ 100,000
Funds are to provide seed money to hire a coordinator to implement the BECZ
Program. The purpose of BECZ is to create a border-oriented, state-designated
incentive zone which offers special incentives and assistance to environmentally
sound businesses.
~
Capital Improvement Proiect Summarv
Neighborhood Revitalization Program
$ 273,800
This proposal is for design and construction of missing public improvements in
atay. This is the Third phase of improvements, which includes sidewalks, curbs,
gutters, and street lights. The atay Committee recommends this proposal as the
top priority for their neighborhood.
South Chula Vista Library
$ 378,196
This allocation is necessary to ensure that construction of the South Chula Vista
Library can begin this faIl. The slowdown in construction activity has meant that
revenues to the Library DIF (a primary source of funds for the construction) are
temporarily decreased from what staff had originally projected. Also, since
Library DIF Funds are received over many, many years, part of the funding from
this source' may not be accumulated in time for the construction of this project
and Block Grant Funds over the next two-three years may be necessary to
complete the funding of this library.
Parkway Complex Renovation - Phase I
$ 288,073
This project will provide for renovation of the gymnasium and pool
restroom/dressing rooms including heating, ventilation and plumbing.
ADA Modifications
$ 36,000
This project will provide for modification to City facilities as required by the
Americans with Disabilities Act making them accessible to individuals with
disabilities. This includes signage, doors, and public access routes.
atay Park Renovation
$ 172,800
Funds are for a Joint Planning Agreement with the Chula Vista Elementary School
District to develop adjoining school grounds as an addition to the neighborhood
park. This will include new irrigation, play apparatus, picnic shelter, sport
fields, restrooms, landscaping, lighting, community stage, and running paths.
ADA Curb Cuts Annual Program
$ 50,000
This project will provide for the construction of concrete wheelchair ramps at an
estimated 47 locations throughout the city.
Iv
Fourth Ave., Del Rey High School/Orange Avenue
$ 67,655
Funds will go to widen Fourth Avenue to accommodate a four-lane roadway with
bike lanes, curb, gutter, sidewalk, raised medians and driveways on both sides
of the street.
Nature Interpretive Center Road Surfacing
$ 30,000
Funds will be used to install AIC pavement on Gunpowder Point Drive from Bay
Boulevard to a point approximately 700 feet west of Bay Boulevard.
Main Library Re-Roof
$ 120,700
Funds will be used to remove and replace "built up" roof areas approximately 20
years old.
Planninl! and Fair Housinl! Proiect Summary
Chula Vista Fair Housing Program
$ 29,000
CDBG regulations require the City to undertake proactive Fair Housing activities.
With assistance from Resident Relations and the Chicano Federation, the San
Diego Fair Housing Council will provide a comprehensive fair housing program
in Chula Vista. Their proposed activities include education and outreach, a
tenant-landlord hotline, follow-up on discrimination complaints, and fair housing
assessments. This program is designed to comply with HUD requirements.
Chula Vista Human Service Council
$ 25,000
The Human Services Council builds coalitions among Chula Vista area social
service providers in order to bring more funding for needed services into the
South Bay. The funds are requested to hire a part-time coordinator.
Otay Committee
$ 5,000
The Otay Committee has requested $5,000 in funding to continue volunteer
community revitalization and beautification efforts, in conjunction with the
Neighborhood Revitalization Program (NRP). Committee activities include
tree-planting, a Community Fair, quarterly newsletter, and neighborhood clean-up
campaign.
High Tech/Biotech Zone (ErR)
$ 100,000
These funds are requested to partially fund an up-front "master" Program ErR for
EastLake's Phase II Business Center. The program's scope and costs are not
finalized. These funds are intended to match funds from EastLake Development
Company.
Parks and Rec. Human Services Coordinator
$ 15,000
This coordinator facilitates the provision of social services and coordinates
information and referral at the Norman Park Senior Center.
Regional Task Force on Homeless
$ 3,000
This grant will assist the task force with important regional reports and special
studies, which are regularly incorporated into local documents such as the
Housing Element and grant proposals for federal and state funding.
If
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT BUDGET
Total Revenues
CDBG Entitlement
Current Program Income
Reallocation- unused from prior years
Section 108 Loan- unused funds
Estimated Program Income for 1993-94
Total Expenditures
Staff Administration
Biotech Zone EIR
Fair Housing Program
C.V. Human Services Council
Parks&Rec Human Services Coordinator
Otay Committee
Regional Task Force on Homeless
Total Administration and Planning *
Chula Vista Literacy Team
Other Social Services
Total Social Services **
City CIP
Section 108 Loan Repayment ***
Otay Neighborhood Rev. Program
South Chula Vista Library- construction
Parkway Complex Renovation
ADA Modifications
Otay Park Renovation
ADA Curb Cuts
Fourth Ave., Del Rey H.S. to Orange Ave
Main Library- Reroof
Main Library- HVAC
Main Library- Parking Lot
NIC Road Surfacing
Total City CIP
Community Projects
B&H Community Appearance Program
S8CS Community Dev. Program (Housing)
SBes Grafitti Eradication
C.V. Elem. School Dist.- Playgrounds
Horne Repair for Seniors
Woodlawn Park Cornrn. Cntr. Rehab
YMCA Aquatics Facility
SBCS Short-term Housing Facility
Border Environmental Zone Coord.
Total Community Projects
1992-93
Final
Sl,568,250
Sl,380,000
S181,000
S7,250
1993-94
Preliminary
S2,248,212
Sl,664,000
S199,670
S209,828
S74,714
S100,000
Sl,568,250 S3,054,417
S165,000 S165,000
S100,000
S30,000 S29,000
S20,000 S25,000
S15,000 $15,000
$5,000 $5,000
$3,000
$235,000 $342,000
$43,190 $43,190
$184,600 $206,810
$227,790 $250,000
$294,850
$332,500
$217,500
S50,000
$44,950
$939,800
$26,810
$48,000
$33,600
S50,000
$7,250
$165,660
$277,907
$273,800
$378,196
$288,073
$36,000
$ 1 72 , 800
$50,000
$67,655
S120,700
$30,000
$1,695,131
$27,000
$57,025
S38,261
S125,000
$20,000
$250,000
$150,000
$100,000
$767,286
* Planning/Admin cap = .20 x (entitlement + program income]
** Social Services cap = .15 x [entitlement + program income]
$250,000 allocation is .15 x entitlement only
*** 1993-94 is 2nd year of 3-year loan repayment period
Page - " j
Ilraanlzatlon
2 AIDS Foundation San Dieao
9 Chula Vista' Police Dept.
11 City of C.U. Librarv
12 Citv of C.U. Police and Fire Depts.
16 Hermandad Mexicana Ncnl Leo. Ctr.
18 Laubach Lit. Council/SD Cty., Inc.
1'1 Lutheran Social Svcs
20 MAAC Project
31 Woodlawn Park Civic Leaaue
7 Center for Women"s Studies & Svcs
10 Chula Vista Police Dept.
32 YMCA Family Stress Center
33 YWCA Battered Women's Svcs
15 Episcopal Community ServIces
lq Episcopal Community Svcs
21 MAAC Project Health Srvcs. Div.
1 Adult Protective Services
q Assoc. for Retarded Citizens
13 Community Service Cntr. for Disabled
22 Salvation Army
23 Senior Adult ServIces
2l:J So. County Lounnl on Aalna
j American Youth Soccer Uraanlzatlon
:J Boys & linls Club of L.U.
6 Bovs & GIrls Club of Chula VIsta
8 Lhula Vista I.:onnect.lon
17 Jobs for Youth
25 So. Bav Family YMCA
2q So. Bay Family YMCA
26 So. Bav Family YMCA
27 So. Bay ~amily YMCA
29 South Bay Community Svcs
30 U.S. Institute of Amateur Athletics
tratY.i.wrlb
IYU~-yq CUHG ~unrllna Reouests- Bv taroet
f'rooram
Soc. Srvcs. & Case Mnomt. txpanslon
PolIce ActIvitIes Leaaue
Chula Vista LIteraCY leam
Citizens Adversity Support leam
Parkvillaae Services Proiect
Chula Vista Literacy leam
Project Hand EmerQency Assistance
EmerQency Food ProQram
Woodlawn Park Community Center
Project Safehouse/Rape Crisis Cntr.
Intervention Team
Child Abuse Treatment Svcs
Men's Counselina
So. Bay Alcohol & Drua Srvcs
Uutreach Health Education
Nosotros
So. Bay Adult Health Care Cntr.
Vocnl. Rehab./Work Activity Proaram
CSeD South
Senior Nutrition Cntr.
Meals on Wheels
Shared HouSlnQ
L.V. HS plaYlna fIeld renovatJon
laroet Uutreach
EducatIon Enhancement f'rooram
Vaylare Center
lemporary Employment
Sunshine Co Chi Idcare ("tay S1. te)
PrYde Prooram
Summer Day Camp
SunshIne Co. Chlldcare
Casa Nuestra
Trainino & Education Lntr.
laraet Reouest f'revlOus
Lommunity $10.000 $0
Communi tv $ 5.000 $0
CommunIty $q:S.J90 $q,L J YO
Community $J5.000 $0
Community $30.000 $0
Community $1. 500 $0
Communitv $20,000 $1q.OOO
Community 10.000 $0
Community $j1.000 $20.000
Domestic Violence $10.000 $5,000
Domestic Violence $25,000 $15.000
Domes ti c Violence $22.qOO $20,000
Domestic Violence $10.000 $5.000
HlthCre/SubAbse $.~5.000 $0
HlthCre/SubAbse $20.000 $10.000
HlthCre/SubAbse $20.000 $0
Senior/Disabled $12.000 $9.000
Senior/Disabled $15,000 $0
Senior/Disabled $13,000 $9.000.
Senior/Disabled $17.000 $0
Senior/Disabled $15.000 $ 5 . 500
Senlor/J)isabled $15.000 $15.000
Yout.h $7.070 $0
You t h $24.Y50 $9.000
You t h $15.7n $0
Youth $20.000 $0
Youth $3.100 $j.l0o
Youth HI.83:~ $0
Yout.h $36.727 $()
Youth $7,000 $6,000
You t h $qq.279 $1 'J.OOO
Yout.h $25,000 $15,000
You t h $IO.qOO $0
Nflu PI: .: ~; I "
It Uraanizatlon
" AIDS FoundatIon San Dieao
3 American Youth Soccer Oraanlzation
q Assoc. for Retarded CItIzens
6 Boys & Girls Club of Chula VIsta
B Chula Vista Connection
9 Chula Vista Police Dept.
12 City of C.V. Police and Fire Depts.
16 Hermandad Mexicana Ncnl Leo. ctr.
18 Laubach Lit. Council/SO cty., Inc.
20 MAAC Project
21 MAAC Project Health Srvcs. Div.
22 Salvation Army
15 Episcopal Communlty Services
25 So. Bay Family YMCA
24 So. Bay Family YMCA
30 U.S. Institute of Amateur Athletics
)0 PRIOR REQUESTS
17 Jobs for Youth
j Center for Women's Studies & Svcs
33 YWCA Battered Women's Svcs
~3 Senior Adult Services
~6 So. Bay Family YMCA
5 Boys & Girls Club of C.V.
1 Adult Protective Servlces
13 Community Ser~Ice Cntr. tor Disabled
14 Episcopal Community Svcs
19 Lutheran Social Svcs
10 Chula Vista PolIce Dept.
27 So. Bay Family YMCA
28 So. County Council on Aoino
29 South Bay Community Svcs
31 Woodlawn Park Civic Leaque
32 YMCA Family Stress Center
11 City of C.V. Library
cdba93.wdb
1993-94 SOCIAL SERVICE FUNDING REQUESTS
Rroaram
Sac. Srvcs. & Lase MnamL ExpanSIon
L.V. HS plaYIna field renovatIon
Vocnl. kehab./Work ActIVIty Proaram
Education Enhancement Proaram
DayLare Center
Police Activities LeaQue
Citizens Adversity Support leam
Parkvillaoe Services Proiect
Chula Vista Literacy leam
Emeroency Food Proqram
Nosotros
Senior Nutrition Cntr.
So. Bay Alcohol & Drua Srvcs
Sunshine Co. Childcare (Otay site)
Pryde Proaram
Irainina & Education Cntr.
temporary Employment
Project Safehouse/Rape Crisis Cntr.
Men's Counselino
Meals on Wheels
Summer Day Camp
laroet Outreach
So. Hay Adult Health Care Cntr.
CSCD South
Outreach Health Education
Project Hand Emerqency Assistance
Intervention leam
SunshIne Co. Childcare
Shared Houslno
Casa Nuestra
Woodlawn Park Community Center
Child Abuse freatment Svcs
Chula Vista Literacy learn
I arnet
CommunIty
Youth
Senior/l>isabJed
Youth
Youth
Community
Community
Community
Community
Community
HlthCre/SubAbse
SenIor/Disabled
HlthCre/SubAbse
Youth
Youth
Youth
Youth
Domestic Violence
Domestic Violence
Senior/Disabled
Youth
Youth
Senlor/Disahled
Senlor/llisabJed
HJthCre/SubAhse
CommunIty
Domestic Violence
Youth
Sen I or /Ih sah led
Youth
Communlty
Domestic Violence
Community
Henupst
$10.000
$1.0/0
$IS.OO()
$15.nl
$;.'0.000
$ 5 ,000
$15,000
$30,000
$1,500
10,000
$~O,OOO
$11 . 000
$,55,000
$B.!:l33
$S6.727
$t'O,400
$,5,100
$10,000
$10,000
$15.000
$/,000
$Z4,Y50
$IZ,OOO
$1.S,OOO
$/0,000
$20.000
$25.000
$44, VY
$15,000
$25,000
$31,000
$n.400
$4.~.190
PreVIOUS
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$0
$~S,100
$5,000
$5,000
$5,500
$6,000
$Y,OOO
$Y,OOO
$Y,OOO
$10.000
$14,000
$15.000
$15,000
$15,000
$15.000
$20,000
$<'0,000
$4.5.1'10
1993-94 CDAG Social Service ~undina Recommendations
jj Oraanizatlon
1 Adult Protective Services
2 AIDS Foundation San Dieao
3 American Youth Soccer Oraanization
4 Assoc. for Retarded Citizens
5 Boys & Girls Club of C.V.
6 Boys & Girls Club of Chula Vista
7 Center for Women s Studies & Svcs
8 Chula Vista Connection
9 Chula Vista Police Dept.
10 Chula Vista Police Dept.
11 City of C.V. Library
12 Clty of C.V. Police and Flre Depts.
13 Communlty Service Cntr. for Disabled
14 Episcopal Community Services
15 Episcopal Community Services
16 Hermandad Mexicana Ncnl Lea. Ctr.
17 Jobs for Touth
18 Laubach Lit. Council/SD Cty.. Inc.
19 Lutheran Social Svcs
- 20 MAAC Project
~ 21 MAAC Project Health Srvcs. Div.
22 Salvation Army
23 Senior Adult Servlces
24 So. Bay Family YMCA
25 So. Bay Family YM~A
26 So. Bay Family YMCA
27 So. Bay Family YMCA
28 So. County Council on Aaina
29 South Bay Community Svcs
30 U.S. Institute of Amateur Athletics
31 Woodlawn Park Civic Leaaue
32 YMCA Family Stress Center
33 YWCA Battered Women's Svcs
CDBG93.WDH
Proaram
So. Bay Adult Health Care Cntr.
Soc. Srvcs. & Case Mnamt. Expansion
C.V. HS playina field renovation
Vocnl. Rehab./Work Activity Proaram
Taraet Outreach
Education Enhancement Proaram
Project Safehouse/Rape Crisis Cntr.
DayCare Center
Police Activities Leaaue
intervention Team
Chula Vista Literacy Team
Citizens Adversity Support Team
LSCi) South
Uutreach Health Education
So. Bay Alcohol & Druo Abuse Srvcs.
Parkvillaoe Services Project
Temporary Employment
Chula Vista Literacy Team
Project Hand EmerQency Assistance
Emeraency Food Prooram
Nosotros
Serilor Nutri hon Lntr.
~Ieals on Wheels
Pryde Proaram
Sunshine Co. Childcare (Utay Site)
Summer Day Camp
Sunshine Co. Childcare
Shared Housino
Casa Nuestra
Trainino & Education Cntr.
Woodlawn Park Community Center
Child Abuse Treatment Svcs
Men's Counselino
Reauest Previous Aaina
$12.000
$10.000
$7.070
$15.000
$24.950
$15.721
$10.000
$20.000
$5.000
$25.000
$4::S.190
$15..000
$1:).000
$20.000
$35.000
$30.000
$.LI00
$1.500
$20.000
10.000
$20.000
$17.()()0
$15.0()0
$,~6. 727
$8.83:i
$7.000
$44.27'1
$15.000
$25.000
$20.4()0
$31.000
$22.lJOO
$10.000
$9.000
$0
$0
$0
$9.000
$0
$5.000
$0
$()
$15.000
$lJ3.19o
$()
$9.000
$10.000
$()
$()
$3.100
$0
$14.000
$0
$0
$0
$5.500
$0
$0
$6.000
$15.000
$15.000
$15.000
$()
$20.000
$20.000
$5.000
$9.000
$5.000
$0
$5.000
$5.000
$0
$5.000
$0
$5.000
$lo.0()()
$12.000
$5.00()
$7.500
$15.000
$0
$0
$::5.100
$1.500
$20.000
$7.500
$0
$(1
$10.000
$20.()()0
$8.000
$6.000
$ 1 5 .000
$15.000
$20.000
$()
$25.000
$20.000
$5.000
Youth
$9.000
$()
$5.000
$10.000
$10.000
$5.000
$5.000
$15.000
$5.000
$15.000
$20.000
$10.000
$5.000
$12.500
$0
$0
$3.100
$1.500
$10.000
$10.000
$8.000
$0
$10.000
$0
$8.000
$5.000
$15.000
$10.000
$15.000
$5.000
$15.000
$15.000
$5.000
Human Rel
$12.000
$3. lJOO
$0
$0
$5.000
$9.000
$10.000
$0
$2.000
$15.000
$15.000
$6.000
$13.000
$15.000
$0
$0
$3.100
$0
$20.000
$10.000
$0
$()
$7.500
$0
$7.000
$7.000
$10.000
$15.000
$15.000
$0
$20.000
$20.000
$10.000
SOCIAL SERVICE ORGANIZATION REQUESTS FOR 1993-94
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT PROGRAM
COMMUNITY-WIDE SERVICES
City of Chula Vista Public Library
ChuIa Vista Literacy Team
Request: $ 43,190 Previous: $ 43,190
A joint project of the Library, Chula Vista Adult School, and the AItrusa Club, the
Literacy Team trains volunteer tutors to provide one-on-one instruction for
functionally-illiterate adults. The Literacy Team recruits volunteers, provides
intensive training, distributes instructional materials, and coordinates tutoring sites.
Funds will be used to cover operational costs and a portion (88 %) of the Literacy
Team Coordinator's salary.
Hermandad Mexicana Nacional Legal Center
ParkviIlage Services Project
Request: $ 120,000
HMNLC is dedicated to serving the immigrant and minority ethnic-American
communities of California. Their goal is to successfully assimilate marginalized
individuals and families into the social mainstream. They promote and assist with the
English language, employment, parenting skills, responsibility in the community,
leadership skills and overall community involvement. The Parkvillage Services
Project will utilize the Parkvillage Housing Project as its hub, serving its residents as
weII as those in a three mile radius. Services will consist of ESL classes, vocational
training, tutoring, citizenship education, legal services and information referral.
Funds will be used for staff salaries, 25 scholarships, operation costs, and to provide
information.
AIDS Foundation of San Diego
Social Services & Case Management Expansion
Request: $ 10,000
The Foundation provides comprehensive, compassionate support services for people
with HIV/AIDS and their families or loved ones. These services include case
1,--\
management, legal clinics, recreation, housing, food, transportation and information.
They strive for community understanding through culturally-sensitive education. The
funds are for salaries and benefits of the case management staff.
Laubach Literacy Council/San Diego County Inc.
Chula Vista Literacy Center
Request: $ 1,500
The center is dedicated to teaching English as a Second Language (ESL). They train
volunteer tutors to teach one-to-one ESL classes to foreign born adult learners. Funds
will be used exclusively to purchase teaching materials for volunteer tutors.
MAAC Project
Emergency Food Program
Request: $ 10,000
Through the Chula Vista Otay Service Center, food, infant formula, and diapers will
be provided to residents. Individuals requesting emergency food will be screened by
experienced staff and the client will be linked to other services to enhance their
opportunity towards self sufficiency. Funds will be used to buy food and supplies.
Woodlawn Park Civic League
Woodlawn Park Community Center
Request: $ 31,000 Previous: $ 20,000
The Center was established by neighborhood residents 20 years ago and is operated
by a volunteer director (Mrs. Gillespie). The Center sponsors a social program for
seniors, hosts a weekly luncheon, operates a weekday, drop-in recreation program for
neighborhood youth and organizes the Summer Youth Program. The funds are for
general operating expenses including insurance, vehicle operation, and activities.
City of Chula Vista Police Dept.
Police Activities League (PAL)
Request: $ 5,000
Police Department volunteers will work with the youth of the community in providing
guidance and feedback as well as crisis intervention. Activities will be both athletic
and social will be held throughout various school sites and community buildings in the
City. The age group will be from the fifth grade level through high school. The
IS--
PAL wishes to work in support with other youth community organizations to assist
them in providing their volunteers in a cooperative coalition. Funds will be used for
operational program costs and admission fees.
City of Chula Vista Police Dept.
Citizen's Adversity Support Team (CAST)
Request: $ 18,650
This program trains volunteers to assist victims of traumatic incidents within twenty
minutes of being telephoned. These volunteers allow Police and Fire Department
personnel to conduct their business more quickly and effectively without sacrificing
the very real needs of the victims. Funds will be used to provide the program's
administrative support costs, training programs for volunteers, to have an annual
appreciation event for all involved, and to pay a stipend to the volunteer coordinator.
Lutheran Social Services
Project Hand
Request: $ 20,000 Previous: $ 14,000
Project Hand staff and volunteers assist families and individuals with basic needs,
including shelter, food, infant supplies, clothing, medication, transportation, utility
bills, and rent. Project Hand provides screening and case management services for
the South Bay Interfaith Shelter Network, a coalition of churches which operates a
temporary shelter program for up to 12 people during 16 weeks in Winter/Spring.
The funds are for the salary and benefits of the Caseworker.
HEALTH CARE/SUBSTANCE ABUSE
MAAC Project Health Services Division
Nosotros
Request: $ 20,000
The main goals of this organization are to provide education, counseling and service
referrals. The Nosotros program currently maintains an Alcohol Recovery Home in
Chula Vista and desires to establish a staff position for an Outreach Specialist to
provide information to the community regarding prevention education, assessment and
referral concerning alcohol and drug abuse. Funds are for the staff person's salary.
lb
Episcopal Community Services
Outreach Health Education
Request: $ 20,000 Previous: $ 10,000
The Outreach program will be based in Otay Community Clinic/Family Health
Center. The Health Educator will provide education at program sites and throughout
the community on early childhood immunization, drug abuse, prenatal care, smoking
cessation, chronic diseases, preventing HIV, healthy lifestyles, wound care,
medication usage, nutrition, and family planning. The funds are for salary of the
Health Educator, rent, education materials, and transportation.
South Bay Alcohol and Drug Abuse Services
Request: $ 35,000
The organization provides support and resources to anyone concerned about or has
alcohol problems. They also provide supportive recovery for drug abusers. Funds
are being requested for a new A/C unit. Their old one is in extremely poor
condition. Some of the children clients have been very uncomfortable due to no air-
conditioning in the center.
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
Center for Women's Studies & Services
Project Safehouse and the Hotline
Request: $ 10,000 Previous: $ 5,000
The Center provides Family Violence and Rape Crisis services, including a 24-hour
crisis hotline for victims of sexual assault and family violence, emergency safe shelter
for battered women and their children, drop-in legal services, victim
advocacy/support, counseling, and education programs. The funds are to hire a
counselor, rent, food, utilities, equipment supplies, educational materials, a telephone
hotline, and to fund the cost of temporary motel vouchers.
City of Chula Vista Police Dept.
Chula Vista Intervention Team
Request: $ 25,000 Previous: $ 15,000
The Chula Vista Intervention team is a coalition between the Chula Vista Police
Department, South Bay Community Services, and other providers of domestic
violence services. After a police report is filled out a Intervention Specialist, supplied
\7
by SBCS and housed in CVPD, creates a treatment plan with the victims. This plan
includes an assessment and monitoring of all family members including follow up
contacts. Funds are for salary of Intervention Specialist.
YMCA Family Stress Center
Child Abuse Treatment Services
Request: $ 22,400 Previous: $ 20,000
The Center works to prevent and treat child abuse through individual, family, and
group counseling, parenting classes, community presentations, and skill-building
classes for youth in foster care. Most children served are victims of sexual abuse; the
Center sponsors support groups for dealing with issues of incest (English & Spanish
groups). The funds are for salaries of the counseling staff and rent.
YWCA of San Diego County
Battered Women's Services Domestic Violence Treatment Program
Request: $ 10,000 Previous: $ 5,000
Battered Women's Services provides a 24-hour hotline, safe emergency shelter,
women's support groups, and children's programs. Men's Counseling is a year-long,
court-ordered, group counseling program to assist the abuser in examining and
understanding the underlying cause of his violent behavior. Four men's groups will
be conducted in Chula Vista. Funds are for salaries, rent, utilities, equipment,
insurance and supplies.
SENIOR AND DISABLED SERVICES
The Salvation Army
Senior Nutrition Center- Chula Vista
Request: $ 22,000
The Salvation Army provides a variety of services to seniors over 60 including:
home delivered meals, classes, transportation assistance, education, recreational
activities, etc... Funding is to purchase a IS-passenger car for a transportation
program in Chula Vista. This van will pick up seniors and bring them to the nutrition
center. Other uses will be for trips to doctors, home delivered meals, shopping and
other necessary appointments.
I~
Association for Retarded Citizens- San Diego Starlight Center
Vocational Rehabilitation/Work Activity Program
Request: $ 15,000
The ARC is dedicated to providing education, training and employment opportunities
to improve the quality of life for persons with mental retardation. Their ultimate goal
is to help their clients attain the highest level of independence. Their program places
individuals with community-based businesses and assists to develop functional skills
that will enhance employability and job maintenance. The funds will pay for the job
coach's salary and necessary program expenses.
Adult Protective Services
South Bay Adult Day Health Care Center
Request: $ 12,000 Previous: $ 9,000
The Center's main goal is to delay or prevent placement in an institution and to
restore optimal mental and physical capacity for self-care. The Center provides
nursing, nutrition, recreation, and counseling services for frail, elderly persons
through a daily activity program. Counseling and other support is provided to
care-giving family members. The funds are for HandyTrans tokens to transport the
clients to and from the Center.
Community Service Center for the Disabled
CSCD Chula Vista Job Club
Request: $ 13,000 Previous: $ 9,000
CSCD operates an independent living center designed to serve persons with
disabilities who are seeking to achieve self-determination, a barrier-free environment,
and equal opportunities. Services include intake, referral, financial benefits advocacy,
in-home personal assistance, housing assistance, and peer counseling. CSCD
conducts a Job Club in Chula Vista. Funds are for staff salaries.
Senior Adult Services
Meals on Wheels
Request: $ 15,000 Previous: $ 5,500
Meals-on-Wheels prepares and delivers hot meals to persons who are unable to
prepare meals for themselves, whether due to age, disability, or illness. Two meals
are delivered each weekday; fees are based on ability to pay. The program also
I~
provides information, referral, and counseling services to help seniors maintain their
independence and remain in their home. Funds are for food and packaging.
South County Council on Aging
Shared Housing
Request: $ 15,000 Previous: $ 15,000
Shared Housing brings together persons with extra living space in their homes with
persons seeking inexpensive housing. The program often links a disabled or frail
elderly adult with a "sharer" who can provide home services in-lieu of paying rent.
The funds are for salaries and operating expenses.
YOUTH SERVICES
American Youth Soccer Organization (AYSO)
Chula Vista High School Playing Field Renovation
Request: $ 7,070
AYSO's goal is to give every youth, between the ages of 5 and 15, regardless of
playing experience and economic status, the opportunity to play soccer. Funds will
be used to replace existing rotary pop-up sprinkler heads with Hunter gear driven
heads, install Hybrid Bermudagrass stolans, and buy equipment. Labor will be
provided by volunteers.
The Chula Vista Connection
DayCare Center- Social, Health & Welfare Facility
Request: $ 20,000
The main goals of the organization are to aid the needy and lower income families,
assist in childcare, support youths, gang prevention, help the homeless and reinforce
family and neighborhood unity. The funds will go to the daycare facility including
rent, water and energy saving changes to the interior and remodeling to match a
school environment.
20
Boys and Girls Club of Chula Vista
Education Enhancement Program
Request: $ 15,721
The Club provides positive activities to develop the health, self-esteem, and character
of youth. The above program is designed to assist students needing special help in
school work. Students will be identified by teachers and other school district
personnel and referred to program for assistance. Funds will be used for a staff
position to conduct the program, space costs, equipment, and supplies.
Target Outreach
Request: $ 24,950 Previous: $ 9,000
The Club provides positive activities to develop the health, self-esteem, and character
of youth. These activities include tutoring, substance abuse prevention, health
education, fine arts, recreation, and team sports. The Teen Outreach program will be
based at the new L Street Center will also provide leadership development,
employment training, and community service. Funds will be used to hire a full time
professional to serve as community outreach intervention counselor.
Jobs for Youth
Temporary Employment
Request: $ 3,100 Previous: $ 3,1000
Jobs for Youth provides job counseling and placement. The program recruits local
youth for temporary jobs, giving them an opportunity to earn money, get work
experience, and build confidence. The Coordinator locates job opportunities and
prepares youth for job interviews. The funds are for advertisement, equipment,
supplies and extend telephone resources.
South Bay Family YMCA
Summer Day Camp
Request: $ 7,000
Previous: $6,000
The camp is an activity program for children in grades K-8 and operates weekdays
from 6:30 AM to 6:00 PM at Rohr Park. Camp activities include sports, field trips,
community involvement, arts & crafts, songs, games, and fun. Trained counselors
provide supervision at a ratio of 12 to 1. Funds are to enable children from
low-income families to participate and will be used to subsidize activities,
equipment/supplies, transportation, and salaries.
1\
Sunshine Company Childcare
Request: $ 44,279 Previous: $ 15,000
Sunshine Co. is a licensed childcare program which encourages physical fitness and
provides sports, arts & crafts, games, homework help, and nutritional snacks. The
childcare sites include after-school care at Harborside, Vista Square, and Feaster
Elementary schools and before and after-school care at Hilltop Elementary. The funds
are to assist children from low-income households to participate and will be used to
subsidize salaries, administration, transportation, food, rent/utilities and supplies.
Sunshine Company ChiIdcare (new site at Otay Elementary School)
Request: $ 8,833
Funds will be used to purchase start-up equipment, furnishings, books, and other
teaching supplies to open a new site at Otay Elementary School.
Pryde Program
Request: $ 36,727
This program is an after-school outreach youth program which will provide substance
abuse and gang prevention curricula, as well as structured recreational activities for
60-70 at-risk youth between the ages of 11-15 in Chula Vista. Funds will go to
operating costs.
South Bay Community Services
Casa Nuestra Youth Shelter
Request: $ 25,000 Previous: $15,000
Casa Nuestra is a community-based, run-away and homeless youth project. Services
include a licensed 8-bed shelter with 24-hour supervision and structured activities,
24-hour crisis intervention, reunification with family, alternative care & independent
living, street outreach, and peer education on drug abuse & AIDS prevention. Funds
will be used for utilities, equipment, food, residents allowances, insurance, and awake
night resident supervision required by Conditional Use Permit.
11-
U.S. Institute of Amateur Athletics
Training & Education Center
Request: $ 20,000
The Institute provides sports training programs for minority youth and young adults
from low-income households who may become involved with gangs. Sports training
and competition will be offered in Tae Kwon Do, Boxing, and Wrestling at their
facility in Chula Vista. This program provides a constructive manner to channel
frustration, hostility, and anger. Funds are for rent, salary to hire a receptionist,
supplies and equipment.
[BM2/A:\PROGRAMS.WPD]
),~
Minutes of the
Regular Meeting of the
COMMISSION ON AGING
DRAFT
Center
Conference Room
1. ROLL CALL
Members present: Commissioners Dennison, Hagedorn, Grindle, Scrivener
Members requesting excused absences:
Fabrick - Illness (personal)
Nute - Illness (family)
Motion to excuse the absences of Commissioners Fabrick and Nute.
MSC SCRIVENER/GRINDLE 4-0
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the March meeting were approved as distributed.
MSC GRINDLE/SCRIVENER 4-0 (Fabrick, Nute out)
2. REPORTS FOR INFORMATION ONLY
a. Human Services Council Report
Chair Dennison asked Commissioner Grindle to report on the Human Services
Forum as she was unable to attend. Commissioner Grindle reported that the
subject was Sexual Harassment and she found it very informative.
In addition, the Commissioners enjoyed the presentation by Father Joe Carrol.
Another Forum is planned for October, however, Chair Dennison asked for items
for the newsletter to be turned in by the end of April.
b. Proiect CARE
Senior Recreation Supervisor Beardsley reported that Lutheran Community
Services is now occupying Workstation B, and is working with Project CARE. They
will be making their public announcement about their portion of the program on
May 6.
The whole Project CARE program is being replicated in National City and EI Cajon.
c. Social Services Subcommittee
L'-j
Center
Room
Committee will meet on April 21. The "feature story" concept will be discussed at
this meeting, so that this concept does not disappear.
d. Centenarian Subcommittee
Commissioner Grindle reported on the planned presentation of the proclamation
in May. Publicity is out on this program and we expect a large turn out for this
presentation. Centenarians at Fredericka will be made on May 11.
Commissioners are invited to attend the May 11 luncheon at Fredericka Manor.
3. ACTION ITEMS
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
CDBG
1.
Adult Protective Services
South Bay Adult Health Care Center
$9,000
Keeps people out of long term care facilities. Serves low income. Keeps
families together. Efficiently run.
2.
AIDS Foundation San Diego
Social Services and Case Mgt. Expansion
$5,000
Programs mostly in San Diego but transportation provided in from Chula
Vista.
3.
American Youth Soccer Organization
CVHS Playing Field Renovation
$-0-
This should not be a priority - maintenance should be done by the schools.
Parents could raise funds.
4.
Assoc. for Retarded Citizens
Voc Rehab./Work Activities Program
$5,000
Program important to families as well as participants. Brings these people
back into the community. Benefits the whole community.
5.
Boys/Girls Club of CV
Target Outreach
$5,000
Same program supported last year. They need to get partial funding from
other sources.
LJ-
7.
8.
9.
10.
6.
Boys/Girls Club of CV
Education Enhancement Program
$-0-
Duplication of services. Boys and Girls Club has been supported by the
City in many of their programs. Pride program is similar and is better
place to put the money.
Center for Women's Studies and Services
Project Safehouse/Rape Crisis Center
$5,000
Valuable program, of great benefit to the community.
Chula Vista Connection
Daycare Center
$-0-
Duplication of service, low experience, no track record. No medical help.
Program was too ambitious for the personnel employed.
Chula Vista Police Department
Police Activities League
$5,000
Good program
Chula Vista Police Department
Intervention team
$10,000
Good program - works with offenders no duplication in area.
11. City of CV Library
Chula Vista Literacy Team
12.
13.
$12,000
Duplication of services in the adult schools. Gave money last year. They
need to find other sources.
City of CV Police & Fire
Citizens Advisory Support Team
$5,000
Good program, mixes the community into the emergency system.
Community Service Ctr for Disabled
CSCD South
$7,500
Did a good job with last year's money
23. Episcopal Community Services
1,\:'
14.
15.
Norman Park Center
Conference Room
S.Bay Alcohol & Drug Abuse
$-0-
Do not want to fund tenant improvements
Episcopal Community Services
Outreach Health Education
$15,000
Work a lot in the Montgomery area - good reputation - no other services
provided in that area - good referral system.
Hermandad Mex. Ncnl Leg Ctr.
Parkvillage Services Project
$-0-
Do not service enough people in the community - duplication of programs
16. Jobs for Youth
Temporary Employment
$3,1 00
17. Laubach Literacy Program
Chula Vista Literacy Team
18.
19.
20.
$1,500
Begin with ESL - train their own volunteers
Lutheran Social Services
Project Hand Emer. Services
$20,000
Very impressive program - serves the community
MAAC Project
Emergency Food Services
$7,500
All supplies used up in last crisis
MAAC Proj Health Services
Nosotros
$-0-
Duplication of Services - Only for men - supported by the City already.
21. Salvation Army
Senior Nutrition Center
22.
$-0-
Funds are for a van, not services
Senior Adult Services
Meals on Wheels
$10,000
]7
Wednesday 3:00 p.m.
April 14, 1993
5
Norman Park Center
Conference Room
Funds are for food - they serve a wider community
24. Sbay Family YMCA
Pryde Program
$20,000
Funds could come from other sources - they work with the school and this
program coordinates with others and fits well
26. Sbay Family YMCA
Sunshine Childcare (Otay Site)
$8,000
New program - good service area - do not want this program to have to
rob from other sites for money.
25. Sbay Family YMCA
Summer Day Camp
$6,000
Has good track record.
27. Sbay Family YMCA
Sunshine Child care
$15,000
Good people - well qualified
28. South County Council on Aging
Shared Housing
$15,000
Served 100 less people than last year. Money is for salaries. They need
to look for another site - already being supported by the City of Chula Vista.
Fills a need.
29. South Bay Commuunity Services
Casa Nuestra
$20,000
Good program - even the neighbors thought it was a good program. Very
important program to the entire community.
30. US Institute of Amateur Athletics
Training and education Ctr.
$-0-
Boys only benefit. Encourages violence. Was not believable when he said
kids had to keep up their grades. They have good role models. Not
currently in Chula Vista but plan to come back.
31. Woodlawn Park Civic League
21
Wednesday 3:00 p.m.
April 14, 1993
6
Norman Park Center
Conference Room
Woodlawn Park Community Ctr.
$25,000
Good program - referrals from Police and Fire have increased.
32. YMCA Family Stress Center
Child Abuse Treatment Services
$20,000
Very important program - only ones providing services in this area.
33. YMCA Battered Women Services
Men's Counseling
$5.000
No duplication of services - protects families and tries to keep them
together.
Motion to forward the above recommendations to Council.
MSC GRINDLE/SCRIVENER 4-0
4. COMMUNICATIONS
a. Written Communications
NONE
b. Commissioners' Remarks
NONE
c. Oral Communications
NONE
5. STAFF REPORT
Senior Recreation Supervisor Beardsley reported on new classes at the Norman
Park Senior Center such as a keyboard class and a journal keeping class taught
by a college professor.
ADJOURNMENT to the regularly scheduled meeting of May 12, 1993.
Respectfully submitted,
2-~
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE
CHULA VISTA HUMAN RELATIONS COMMISSION
April 14, 1993- 5:00 p.m. Council Conf Room
MEMBERS PRESENT: Chairman Howell, Commissioners John Allen,
Elizabeth Allen, Delehanty and Hashimoto
MEMBERS ABSENT: Commissioner Slovinsky (excused absence)
Commissioner Hicks (unexcused absence)
STAFF PRESENT: Ben Martinez, Community Development Specialist
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MSUC (J. Allen/L Allen) to approve the minutes to the
meeting of February 10, 1993 as prepared by the Commission Secretary.
REVIEW & RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 1993/94 REQUESTS FOR BLOCK GRANT
FUNDING - On March 31, 1993, the Commission on Aging, Human Relations
Commission and the Youth Commission conducted a Joint Workshop for the purpose of
reviewing the 1993/94 Requests for Block Grant Funding. At this time, the Human
Relations Commission reviewed each request to present final recommendations for the
Council's consideration.
MSUC (E. Allen/Delehanty) that the Human Relations Commission recommend the
following agencies for funding in the 1993/94 fiscal year for a total of $250,000:
Jobs for Youth ($3,100), Police Activities League ($2,000), YWCA Battered Women
Program ($10,000), Adult Protective Services ($12,000) Chula Vista Police Intervention
Team ($15,000), Community Service Center ($13,000), Episcopal Community Services
($15,000), Lutheran Social Services ($20,000), MAAC Emergency Food Program
($10,000), Senior Adult Services ($7,500), South County Council on Aging ($15,000),
South Bay Community Services - Casa Nuestra ($15,000), YMCA Family Stress ($20,000),
Woodlawn Park Civic League ($20,000), South Bay YMCA Summer Day Camp ($7,000),
Boys & Girls Club ($5,000), South Bay Family YMCA Sunshine Childcare Otay Elementary
($7,000), South Bay Family YMCA Summer ($10,000), Chula Vista Library Literacy Team
($15,000), Boys & Girls Club Education Program ($9,000), Project Safe House ($10,000),
Citizens Support Team ($6,000) and Aids Foundation ($3,400).
30
PUBLIC REMARKS - None
COMMISSION COMMENTS - 1) Referring to earlier distributed correspondence,
Commissioner Delehanty outlined circumstances which caused absences from several
Commission meetings and requested that her resignation be withdrawn. 2)
Commissioner Delehanty's written communication concerning the Chula Vista Center
carousel will be docketed for discussion during the next regular meeting.
ADJOURNMENT - 7:40 p.m.
4/26/93
2,1
/
YOUTH COMMISSION
.
AGENDA
PARKS AND RECREATION CONFERENCE ROOM
Mondav. Mav 10. 1993
6:30 p.m.
I
f
Call Meeting to Order/Roll Call/Approval of Minutes
Hearing of Public Remarks
OLD BUSINESS
A. Cultural Arts Festival
B. Youth Summit
NEW BUSINESS
\.
NONE
COMMUNICATIONS
A. Commission Remarks/Sub-Committee Reports
B. written communications
MONTHLY REPORT
A. Parks and Recreation
B. Police Department
Adjournment to the regularly scheduled meeting on
June, 14, 1993.
j~
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE YOUTH COMMISSION
April 12, 1993
Parks and Recreation
Conference Room City Hall
Meeting was called to order at 6:30 pm by Chair Prescott.
Roll call was taken.
Members Present:
Chair Prescott, Commissioners
Borders, Cazares, Jenney,
Meservy, and Page
Commissioner McCullough and
Wubenhurst
Member Absent:
Staff Present:
Youth
Rosemary
Lederle
Commission
Brodbeck,
Advisor
Agent Ron
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
'.
Motion was made by Commissioner Page to approve the
minutes of the March 8, 1993 meeting, seconded by
Commissioner Meservy. All commissioners present in favor
(Commissioner McCullough and Commissioner Wubenhurst
absent). Motion carried.
2. HEARING OF PUBLIC REMARKS - None
3. OLD BUSINESS
commission Cards/Name Badqes - Advisor Brodbeck received
commission business cards. Will distribute after meeting
for commissioners interested.
commission Ordinance - Chair Prescott advised commission
needed a 5-0 vote. Commission re-voted to approve Youth
commission Ordinance. 5-0 unanymous vote (Commissioners
Wubenhurst and McCullough absent). Motion carried.
Advisor Brodbeck discussed some of the changes further.
Brodbeck discussed changes in some of the language such as
"rap" to "open communication" and the guidelines of who' ~_-~
the commiss~on is going to accept in terms of junior high--
and high school.
'))
YOUTH COMMISSION
2
April 12, 1993
4. NEW BUSINESS
Cultural Arts Festival. Mav 8. 1993 - Brodbeck advised
commission of location of hot dog/soda booth, which will
be on Parkway. Brodbeck is hoping booth be directly in
front of the Parkway Community Center.
Brodbeck will fill out application to Health Department
which is to make sure all food venders conform to Health
Department codes. Essentially what that consists of is
those serving food need to make sure their pre-packaged
food is going to be well refrigerated and servers wear
gloves or have clean hands.
Chair Prescott has received eight considerations for
donations of hot dogs, buns, and soda. There are no
definite confirmations at this time. Prescott advised he
still needs to send letters to McDonald's, Lucky
Supermarket and Big Bear Stores. He is considering
sending a letter to Southland Corp. hoping to get
donations from them.
Prescott explained he is trying to seek donations so the
Youth Commission will not have to spend their funds for
the food items.
Youth Summit - Chair Prescott discussed how the Youth
Action Program presented by Sonny Shy is part of the Youth
Summit, in which the representatives from the youth would
get together and formulate ideas as to what they feel the
city should be doing to help the youth out better.
Prescott said this is a more sophisticated version of what
the Youth Commission did on the Youth Forum. More
representatives of the youth will be available giving
their ideas.
Prescott and Brodbeck felt that having the Youth
Commission act as one of the small focus groups
formulating ideas and have one commissioner act as
representative in the Youth Summit working along with
other focus groups would be interesting.
Organizations involved are representatives from the
Sweetwater School District that will network between the
junior high and high schools, YMCA, and Youth Commission.
Brodbeck advised her assistant, steve Scott, will be
developing another focus group that will target the junior
high and high school students as well. Each focus group -:_
will consist of between 10 and 15 individuals. .
Youth Summit wants commission to formulate focus group
within the next month. Pre-Summit Meeting with all youth
3~
\
t\
,
/
/
~
YOUTH COMMISSION
3
April 12, 1993
Youth Summit (cont'd)
representatives will be on
Phase 1 of focus group.
actually occur.
Prescott informed Commission they need to get together as
a group to discuss ideas. Commission will meet Thursday
eveng, April 15, 1993 at 6:00 p.m.
May 3,
By June
1993. May 12 will be
2 presentation will
Communi tv Development Block Grant Chair Prescott
introduced Mr. Martinez, Community Development Department.
Mr. Martinez briefly discussed the CDBG application
proposals that were presented to the Commission by David
Harris, Community Development Department, at last month's
meeting. The Commission was asked to review the
applications and present their recommendations at this
month's meeting.
Mr. Martinez indicated that the Community Development
Department would compile the recommendations from the
Youth Commission, Commission on Agin~ and the Human
Relations Commission, for the City Counc~l.
The Commission discussed and agreed on the listed
recommendations (see attached).
Motion made by Commissioner Jenney to approve the
recommendations. Seconded by Commissioner Meservy. 5-0
vote (Commissioner Wubenhurst and McCullough absent).
Motion carried.
5. COMMUNICATIONS
commission Remarks - None.
Sub-Committee Reports: Advisor Brodbeck announced the
sub-committees will be evaluated
in June 1993.
Budqet and Finance Committee - None.
publicitv Committee - None.
Service Committee - None.
written Communications - None.
3~
YOUTH COMMISSION
April 12, 1993
4
6. MONTHLY REPORT
Parks and Recreation Department Advisor Rosemary
Brodbeck advised she has the new commission business
cards.
Brodbeck also advised now that the commission is starting
fund-raisers, there will be expenditures. She will set up
trust account for money raised from Cultural Arts Festival
hot dog/soda booth.
Police Department - None.
Motion made by Commissioner
seconded by Commissioner
Adjournment to the regularly
1993 at 6:30 pm.
Page to adjourn the meeting,
Meservy. Motion carried.
scheduled meeting on May 10,
Respectfully submitted,
( - '~iJ- V;1o/j-
Theresa L. Troy ()
Secretary
3!u
\
\
\
\
#
')RC; \T Z..HIO\
\'1'11t Prr.)t-pct.i\-;=- Ser'\-i,~'t::"s
.\lDS F,~)undA.tlon San Diego
-;meri'~'rln Youth Soccer
(")rg3.ni z,qt ion
~~~nri~tion for Retaz'ded
(, it i :::'ens
Roys and Girls Club of C.V
Tn. rge t Ollt reach
F~,) ~- S .1 n d. r; i t'l s C 1 u b 0 f C. \ - .
EdllCfl t- ion Enhancempt:t ProgrA.m
('pnter for ~-omen's Studies
and Spr\-i..es
(.t)lll~ \'i~ta Conrlectiorl
CLllla \"iSt":R Pol i.cP Del:tartITient
Police -\ctj\-ities Leag:\iE'
('hn].::-, \'ista Fo:ice I:epa.rtm.::-nt
TIlt "'r'. f'nt ie,l) Te.:lm
C;t\' of ('hula \>istA Liht';tr:,'
;~i l.y :-:of Chlll:l \'isti-\ p')} ir-?
'1IJ'1 FirE" r1er"qltmen;,s
r-'()nml_lnit~. Ser\-ice (:-ent,,'r [')1'
[ll-rihled
Fpi~"opal Commllnity Sp['\-i<:es
HermHndad Mexicana \acional
Leg.:=tl lenter
).,1" c',Jr Youth
L:-l:lt,;,)r'fl Lit eracy C'ounc i 1
S;-\. fJ fl j P g 0 Co u n t y, In::.
tldheran Social Services
....l~.~C Pr,(.je( t
3,7
H)L'TH
("0\{'11SS10:\
RE('0\j'IE\DH I 0\5
S g,ono
- 0 -
$ 5,000
$10,000
S10,000
.... ;), OOJ
S 5,000
S15,000
$ 5,000
515,000
S20,000
SIO,OM:
S ,),000
- 0 -
- 0 -
S 3,100
S 1,500
$10,000
SIO,OOO
.
OI"GA':IZAIIO\
~AAC Fro.jec-t Health Ser\ices
D ~ \ is 1 (,n
SA.1 \";q t ion -\r'my
Senior Adult 5en'lces
SOllth Ray Y"IC.-\
Pryde Program
South [':"y Y'IC\
Sunshir,e Co. Child C"re
, ()t n:" Sit e I
SOllth Ray Y\.1CA
~ljlllmer Pay Camp
Sou t h Bay Y\lCA
Sun:.-::hine Co. Chlld CaTe
SOllth B~~y County Council
on .-\giI1~
South Bay Community Ser\"ices
("a:-:a \11f.."St ra
.s. ~nstitllte of _-.\mateur'
~thlf>lics {'-'.S.I.,~.A.:
i\-()~),ll!ndl Parl-;: Ci\"ic Le~lg11e
Y\fC-'A Fami]~. Stress Cerlte:'
YhCA Battered homen's Ser\-ices
TOT.~ L :
3~
YOLTH
1.'0'1'115510\
RECO'{'IE\[)A II 0\5
5 8,000
- 0 -
510,000
- 0 -
5 8,000
$ 5,000
515,000
$10,000
515,000
5 5,000
515,000
515,000
5 5.000
5259,600.
SOCIAL SERVICE FUNDING POLICY
This social service policy is designed to identify those projects and agencies
"which can deliver important benefit to Chula Vista residents effectively and
efficiently. In addition to the use of the policy guidelines listed below,
the City Council will require .the submission of social service agencies'
expenses, income, and funding sources from the previous two years to aid in
the evaluation of funding proposals.
1. Social service projects must establish or maintain a-resource which would
enhance the quality of life of. the Chula Vista community.
2. Initial grants to social service projects must create a new level of
service for the clients of the requesting agency or must replace funding
sources for existing levels of service which have been removed through no
fault of the requesting agency.
3.
Soci a 1 servi ce
demonstrated in
effici ently.
grants wi 11 be
the past the
made only
capacity to
to agencies which
perform diligently
have
and
4. Preference will be given to those projects which instill in their clients
the resources to move beyond the need for assistance by that agency or
which allow their clients to avoid greater dependency on other forms of
social assistance.
S. Preference will be given to those projects which are most cost effective
in the delivery of benefit. to low and moderate-income citizens of Chula
Vi s ta.
6.
Preference will be given to "those projects which
self-suffi ci ent or woul d secure other forms of assi stance
City Community Development Block Grant assistance.
7. Social service grants will be made only to agencies and projects which
appear to have the capacity to expend those grant funds in a timely manner.
woul d become
as a resul t of
8. Preference will be given to those p~ojects which do not dupl icate an
"existing service.
~
3Cf
SOCIAL SERVICE PLAN RECOMMENDATIONS
The Social Services Plan of the City of Chula Vista
identifies the specific types of local social services for
which there is the greatest need to invest additional
resources. The plan is based on three sets of surveys
conducted of local social service providers, Chula Vista
community leaders and the general Chula Vista public.
The priority areas most often identified as needing further
social service intervention are:
A. ALCOHOL AND DRUG ABUSE
B. CHILD CARE AND LATCHKEY PROGRAMS
C. CHILD AND SPOUSAL ABUSE/DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
The plan also emphasizes the
organization of service provision:
three
needs
for
the
1. Extension of human care programs in South Chula Vista,
such as the development, expansion and introduction of
new programs at multi-service centers;
2. Emphasis on coordinated services, shared facilities and
multi-service centers;
3. Further provision. of senior programs at existing
service centers.
BG-PLAN
)If'
L-fO
,
SOCIAL SERVICE PROJECTS
II Oroanization
,
\
1 Adult Protective Services
2 AIDS Foundation San Dieoo
3 American Youth Soccer Organization
4 Assoc. for Retarded Citizens
5 Boys & Girls Club of C.V.
6 Boys & Girls Club of Chula Vista
7 Center for Women's Studies & Svcs
8 Chula Vista Connectlon
9 Chula Vista Police Deot.
10 Chula Vista Police Deot.
11 City of C.V. Library
12 City of C.V. Police and Fire Depts.
13 Community Service Cntr. for Disabled
14 Episcopal Community Servlces
15 Episcopal Community Service~
16 Hermandad Mexicana Ncnl Leo. Ctr.
17 Jobs for Youth
18 Laubach Lit. Council/SD Cty., Inc.
19 Lutheran Soclal Svcs
20 MAAC Prolect
2\ MAAC Proiect Health Srvcs. Div.
22 Salvatlon Army
2j Senlor Adult Servlres
24 So. Bay Family YMCA
25 So. Bay Family YMCA
26 So. Bay Family YMCA
27 So. Bay Family YMCA
28 So. County Council on Aoino
29 South Bay Community Svcs
30 U.S. Institute of Amateur Athletics
31 Woodlawn Park Civic Leaoue
32 YMCA Family Stress Center
33 YWCA Battered Womens Svcs
Prooram
So. Bay Adult Health Care Cntr.
Soc. Srvcs. & Case Mno~t. Expansion
C.V. HS playino field renovation
Vocnl. Rehab./Work Activity Proqram
Target Outreach
Education Enhancement Prooram
Project Safehouse/Raoe Crisis Cntr.
DayCare Center
Police Activities Leaoue
Intervention leam
Chula Vista Literacy Team
Citizens Adversity Support leam
CSCD South
Uutreach Health Educatlon
So. Bay Alcohol & Oruo Abuse Srvcs.
Parkvillaoe Servlces Proier.t
Temporary Employment
Chula Vl~ta II terar.y I eam
Prolect Hand Emeroency Asslstanre
Emerqency Food Proqram
Nosot.ros
Senior ~~tritioo ~ntr.
Meals on Wheels
Pryde Proqram
Sunshine Co. Childcare (Utay SIte)
Summer Day Camp
Sunshine Co. ~hildcare
Shared Housino
Casa Nuestra
Traininq & Education Cntr.
Woodlawn Park Community Center
Child Abuse Ireatment Svcs
Men's Counselinq
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
F1JNDING APPLICA nON FOR 1993-94
1f"~ .{;
ii FEB 1993
Received
Community Development
Departmer.t
NOTE: THIS APPLICATION IS DUE NO LATER THAN MARCH I, 1993 AT 5
P.M. AT THE CITY OF CHUU VISTA, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT, 276 FOURTH AVE., CHUU VISTA.
Program/Project Name:
South Bay Adult Day Health Care Center
Name of Organization:
Adult Protective Services, Inc.
Contact Person:
Nancy Hitchcock, R.N. Title
Program Manager
-...-
Address:
Chula Vista, CA 91910 Telephon~
I. Amount of Funding Requested:
$ 12,000
2. Amount of 1992-93 CDBG Funding:
$ 9.000
3. If this is an existing program, how many
years has it served Chula Vista residents?
19 years
4. Is this program physically located in Chula Vista?
Yes
5. Describe the main goal(s), objectives, and activities of your organization:
The main goals of the program are to prevent institutionalization and
to improve the quality and independence of life for senior citizens
who may be placed in nursing homes inappropriately or left in an
unsafe environment.
Improving mental and physical well-being, keeping seniors as independent
as possible and providing respite for family caregivers are some of the
programs main objectives.
Participants who attend the center receive some or all of the following
services which are provided at the center: medical supervision, nursing,
social work, rehabilitation, nutrition, recreation, transportation and
psychological services. In addition, help for family members include
personal recommendations for easier home management, emotional support
groups, individual counseling and respite which is a by-product of the
program.
6. Describe the specific program for which funds are requested: (If you are only
requesting funds for general organizational support, go to question # 10).
South Bay Adult Day Health Care Center is a department of Adult Protect-
ive Services, Inc., a private, non-profit 50l(c)3 agency. The South
Bay Adult Day Health Care Center has been caring for disabled seniors in
the Chula Vista area since March 1, 1974. The center is licensed to
serve fifty participants a day by the California Department of Aging
and Department of Health Services.
7. Why is this program needed in Chula Vista?:
The 1990 census shows that there are 23,876 over age 60, residents of
Chula Vista (SANDAG). This represents a 25% increase in the over 60
population since 1985. The California State Department of Health
Services estimates that 5% of the over 60 population need adult day
health care services. This means that approximately 1,200 Chula Vista
residents could use these services. There is a great need for more
centers in Chula Vista.
8. Who will be providing the services? Briefly describe qualifications of key
staff and indicate their level of education/training:
The full time core staff at the center include the Program Manager, RN:
two Social Workers, MSW; two Nurses LVN; an Activity Coordinator, Certi-
fied; eight part-time Program Aides and ten part-time volunteers.
Staff shared with our three other centers include administrative and fiscal
services; Medical Director; Nursing Supervisor RN; Occupational Therapist
O.T.R.; Occupational Therapist Assistant C.O.T.A.: Physical Therapist R.P.T.:
Dietician; Speech Therapist; Pharmacist; Psychiatrist; and a Licensed
Clinical Social Worker.
9. Program Budget: Total: $540,600
(Include only those expenses directly related to the program for which funding is
requested).
CDBG OTHER FUNDS
Salaries/Benefits: $ $ 382,460
Rent/Utilities: 35,500
Equipment/Supplies: 9,672
Consultant &
Other Contract Serv.ices: 33,670
Other Transportation: 12,000 29,848
Nutrition, Food &
Other Miscellaneous: 37,450
Subtotals: $ 12,000 $ 528,600
10. Specify exactly how the CDBG funds will be used:
Community Development Block Grant Funds will be used to transport dis-
abled elderly Chula Vista residents to the South Bay Adult Day Health Care
Center. All of the residents will be disabled, over age 60 and low income.
All of the funds will be used to purchase trips on HandyTrans.
Adult Protective Services, Inc. will furnish the City of Chula Vista
with quarterly reports on the characteristics of the people served -
number, gender, ethnicity and income level.
II. Please list the name and amount of other secured or potential sources of
funding for this specific program:
Secured sources of funding:
MEDI-CAL
VA
PARTICIPANT
457,897
56,590
14,113
Potential resource of funding:
City of Chula Vista CDBG 12,000
12. Do you anticipate needing CDBG funding for this program in subsequent
years? Yes x No
If yes, how much funding will be needed each year?
1994-95 $ 15.000 1995-96 $ 15,000 1996-97 $ Unknown
13. Who will be served by your program and what are the boundaries of your
service aroca '!
Clients served by the South Bay Adult Day Health Care Center will be
disabled residents of Chula Vista, over age 60 and low income. Family
members and other older disabled seniors from the surrounding community
may also be served. The CDBG grant will only be used to subsidize Chula
Vista residents over age 60.
The South Bay Adult Day Health Care Center is licensed by the State to serve
residents within the city limits of Chula Vista. Waivers may be obtained to
serve residents outside this area.
14. How do people find out about your program? How do you do outreach?
Many people learn about this program from family members, neighbors, doctors
friends, etc., who have had a friend or relative attend the Center. Agency
and Center staff promote the program by distributing flyers and brochures,
atten~ing community meetings and educational and community services fairs,
providing educational programs at staff meetings in hospitals and public and
social service agencies. Public service announcements and other media cov-
erage have also been used.
IS. Do you assist clients to get to your program site or provide services out in the
community?
Services are provided to clients at the center. 90% of the clients are
transported to and from the center by our own van or by HandyTrans. The
rest are transported by family. Family counseling can be done in the home
and the Social Worker, Occupational Therapist and Physical Therapist visit
client's homes to evaluate for safety and handicap adaptability.
16. For this specific program for which COBG is requested, estimate the total
number of:
a. Total clients served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94 300
1992-93 300
1991-92 300
b. Chula Vista residents served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94 240
1992-93 240
1991-92 240
c. Low-income clients served or estimated to be served in:
(low-income household is defined as follows: 1 person =$23, 150; 2person =$26,450;
3pcrson = $29,750; 4person =$33,050)
1993-94 98%
1992-93 98%
1991-92 98%
17. What methods will you use to account for the income level and other
demographic information on your clients?
Since over 85% of our participants are on Medi-Cal their financial status
has already been determined by the County Department of Social Services.
In addition all participants are required to disclose their financial
status and this information is listed on a signed Agreement of ADHC
Participation form.
An Intake Data Sheet is completed for all participants. This form contains
information such as name, address, date of birth, sex, ethnicity, marital
status, etc.
PLEASE AITACH THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
a) A PROGRAM BROCHURE OR FLYER (if you have one)
b) A CURRENT LIST OF YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS (one page)
c) A COMPLETE LIST OF CURRENT SOURCES OF REVENUE (one page)
HENBERS OF THE BOARD
OF DIRECTORS
OF ADULT PROTECTIVE SERVICES, INC.
Guy Deeks, President
Anita Harbert
San Diego, CA 92123
San Diego, CA
Marie Hood, Vice President
San Die~ CA
~vJ
92116
-Susan La Flam
San Diego Gas & Electric
Billy Frank, 2nd Vice President
San Diego, CA
92112
-
San Diego, CA 92123-1756
Lloyd Plummer
La Hesa, CA 91941
Evelyn Herrmann, Secretary
San Diego, CA 92115
Arthur Price, ADM
Coronado, CA 92118
Faustina Solis, Assistant Secretary
Georgette Schell
San Diego, CA 92123
Thomas A. Shumaker, Treasurer
Lakeside, CA 92040
San Diego, CA 92106
Hedy Stelzer
Muriel Pardee Baze
Chula Vista, CA 91913
421-8206
Rancho Sante Fe, CA 92067
- -
Charles Bell, PhD
Seth Torres
American Assoc. for Retired PeQple
Los Angeles, CA 90043
.1, Beach] CA
,
90807
Encinitas, CA 92024
San Diego, CA
Dorothy Yonemitsu
9J~
Suzanne Carey
Technical Advisor
Pamela Jo Craig
Chula Vista, CA 91910
H. L. Dickson
Building Committee Advisor
Rev. A. Paul Veenstra
Chula Vista Community Church
San Diego, CA 92117
....
APS: 2/93
91910
CURRENT SOURCES OF REVENUE
1. Medi-Cal reimbursement - State of California
2. Veterans Administration
3. Participant fees
Adult Day Health Care is an organized
day program of therapeutic, social and
health services in a day health care
center serving elderly persons or other
adults with physical or mental im-
pairments to restore or maintain to the
fullest extent possible the capacity for
self-care.
Adult Day Health Care services include
nursing, meals and transportation, social
services and restorative therapies in a
warm, caring environment. Independence,
self-expression and being part of a group
help many seniors and other adults
isolated by illness or the loss of a loved
one. Adult Day Health Care Centers work
with adults through four facilities strate-
gically located throughout the county.
For more information, contact the Pro-
gram Manager at your nearest center.
North County Center
651 Eucalyptus St., Vista
758-2210
'Aid-City Center
"077 Fairmount Ave.
;an Diego
584-0250
South Bay Center
.301 E. "J" St., Chula Vista
426-0982
Heartland Center
9065 Edgemoor Dr., Santee
448-9300
~ This project is supported by Medi-Cal
benefits, private fees and donations.
A variety of social work services is
available for seniors, 55 and older, with
serious mental health problems. Staff
specialists in geriatric social work provide
a comprehensive in-home evaluation and
prepare an individualized plan of care.
Social workers can also assist with
negotiating the maze of bureaucracy to
obtain entitlements and other benefits
from programs within the senior services
network. This coordination of options,
resources and supports can enable the
frail senior to function safely at home for
as long as possible.
For more information, please contact the
Program Coordinator at (619) 283-5731.
This progmm is funded by the County
of San Diego and the State of Califor-
nia through a Short-Doyle contract.
-.
-~ ""~~(' -.-,
:! . It; ; , : ~.' i . : : ;
._2'~'
~
The Senior Aides Project offers half-
time employment in more than 70 dif-
ferent community programs in the county
to many older adults on a limited income
who have difficulty in finding employ-
ment. To be eligible the person must be a
resident of San Diego County in need of
part-time employment, at least 55 years
of age, and be below an economic
guideline.
A Job Bank helps the seniors explore
employment potential, helps in arranging
job interviews and provides specialized
training for vocational progress.
Senior Aides assist in programs serving
the day care centers, nutrition centers,
senior centers, city and county libraries.
adult day health centers, information and
referral services, ombudsman programs
and other community service agencies.
Interested seniors, employers and com-
munity service agencies should call
280-6127 for more information.
The Senior Aides Project is funded
under Title V of the Older Americans
Act through the Area Agency on Ag-
ing, the Xational Council of Senior
Citizens and San Diego County.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COMMUNITY DEVEWPMENT BWCK GRANT
FUNDING APPLICATION FOR 1993-94
NOTE: THIS APPLICATION IS DUE NO LATER THAN MARCH 1, 1993 AT 5
P.M. AT THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT, 276 FOURTH AVE., CHULA VISTA.
Program/Project Name: Social Services &. Case Manae:ement Expansion
Name of Organization: AIDS Foundation Slln Diefo
Contact Person: Dillne Konne
Title Tntprim EXP("lItivp nirprtor
Address:
San Diego, ,A 92103
Telephone
1. Amount of Funding Requested:
$ 10,000
2. Amount of 1992-93 CDBG Funding:
$ -0-
3. If this is an existing program, how many
years has it served Chula Vista residents?
1 n years
4. Is this program physically located in Chula Vista?
yes
5. Describe the main goal(s), objectives, an~ activities of your organization:
AFSD provides social Services and mY/AIDS prevention education and outreach to
the residents of San Diego County. AFSD provides sllch services as case manageMent,
public benefits counseling, emotional support (Buddy Program), support [;roups, food
distrubtion, transportation, &. housing (Truax House). It also provides prevention
education & outreach through its outreach, speaker's bureau, Project Lifeguford, &.
infonlation hoUine programs.
/
'-'l.'
FEB 1993
c. R,,(._,
Tnfllil;;'I,'11
{i-f,
6. Describe the specific program for which funds are requested: (If you are only
requesting funds for general organizational support, go to question # 10).
AFSD requests funds for expansion of its case management program to more effectively
serve the residents of Chula Vista. AFSD currently has a client case load of more than
900 persons living with mV-symptomatic disease or AIDS. Approximately 50 persons, or
5.5 % of the total 900 + caseload, are Chula Vista residents. AFSD currently has 4.5
ease managers (social workers) to serve this large ease load. The ease manager is
responsible for determining eligibility for AFSD programs, providing public benefits
counseling and assistance, setting up home health care, providing emergency assistance,
providing crisis intervention, and coordinating, advocating, and monitoring other client
7 ..oeer;ls. h" d d. C
. Why IS t IS program nee e m hula Vista?:
AFSD currently provides this program to Chula Vista residents. Due to outreach efforts,
AFSD has seen an increase in utlization of services by Chula Vista residents. AFSD
has two collaborative sites in Chula Vista; one site is for the provision of transportation,
and the other site is for the distribution of food. AFSD serves many mono- or bi-
lingual persons who live in Chula Vista.
8. Who will be providing the services? Briefiy describe qualifications of key
staff and indicate their level of education/training:
The Case Management Program is staffed by varying degrees of education and life
experience. Many of the staff have degrees in social work, psychology, nursing, and
substance abuse. Several of the staff are licensed as LCSW's or r.iFCC"s. This mixture
of disclipines creates and effective team to deal with the many types of people who
utilizes AFSD services.
9. Program Budget: Total: $ 2U7,350
(Include only those expenses directly related to the program for which funding is
requested).
Other indirect cost~
CDBG OTHER FUNDS
$ 50,000 $ lU9,OUO
-0- 2ii,GOO
-0- :',000
-0- 23,350
Salaries/Benefits:
Rent/Utilities:
Equipment/Supplies:
Other
Other
Subtotals:
$ 51l,000
$
157,350
10. Specify exactly how the CDBG funds will be used:
AFSD will use the funds to pay for salaries and fringe benefits of the case management
staff.
11. Please list the name and amount of other secured or potential sources of
funding for this specific program:
Ryan White CARE Act (Federal)
$ 96,540
CDBG (National City, Escondido, La l\lesa)
9,800
AFSD General Fund (fundraising)
101,010
12. Do you anticipate needing CDBG funding for this program in subsequent
years? Yes XXX No
If yes, how much funding will be needed each year?
1994-95 $ 12,000 1995-96 $ 14,000 1996-97 $ 16.000
13. Who will be served by your program and what are the boundaries of your
service area?
AFSD serves all of San Diego County, which includcs thc city of Chula VistH.
AFSD provides services to r.len, women, and children with mv or AIDS.
14. How do people find out about your program? How do you do outreach?
The community finds out about our programs through referral by physicians, hospitals,
social services agencies, social security administration, and governmental agcncies.
AFSD also provides outreach education which provides AFSD with community referrals.
15. Do you assist clients to get to your program site or provide services out in the
community?
AFSD provides transportation to its clients throughout San Diego County and residents
of Chula Vista. AFSD also has many collaborative sites throughout San Dieg-o County,
including two in Chula Vista.
16. For this specific program for which CDBG is requested, estimate the total
number of:
a. Total clients served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94 1,700
1992-93 1,500
1991-92 1.200
b. Chula Vista residents served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94 IOU
1992-93 75
1991-92 50
c. Low-income clients served or estimated to be served in:
(low-income household is defined as follows: lperson=$23,ISO; 2person=$26,4S0;
3person=$29,7S0; 4person=$33,OSO)
1993-94 100
1992-93 75
1991-92 50
17. What methods will you use to account for the income level and other
demographic information on your clients?
AFSD, as a part of its intake and monitoring procedure, requests proof of income on all
clients who use its programs. AFSD periodically re-verifies the income of all of its
clients.
PLEASE ATTACH THE FOllOWING ITEMS:
a) A PROGRAM BROCHURE OR FLYER (if you have one)
b) A CURRENT LIST OF YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS (one page)
c) A COMPLETE LIST OF CURRENT SOURCES OF REVENUE (one page)
..
AIDS
SUPPORT
EDUCATE
ADVOCATE
..tO~O Ct.'!1lrt' :-'L
~an Dw~o. c.-\ ~~ltl;,:
Hil91 ~1)-.)d;,O
FAX 1I-i19J ..t~17-~1:!;1~
1)01 Eut'3.lyptu-: A'.l'nul:'
\'I..;ta. CA Y:!IJN
(t)19194;.J-t)(uJ
@
Pnnted On ReCYcled P:lpCr
AIDS Foundation San Diego
Board of Directors - December 1992
==============~======================
Jack Cam~a
. - --. -
Del Mar, CA 92104
San Diego City Schools
..-.
-------------------------------------
-------------------------------------
Garrett Dettling, Ph.D
Counselors/Consultants
San Diego, CA 92103
.....
-------------------------------------
-------------------------------------
Lois French
~
-------------------------------------
-------------------------------------
Shawn Harrity, MD
Physician,
HIV / AIDS Speciality,
Owens Clinic, UCSD
...
-------------------------------------
-------------------------------------
Luann Kelley, Esq.
Attorney, Private Practice
San Diego, CA 92130
--
-------------------------------------
-------------------------------------
Ken Kornweibel
Interior Design
San Diego, CA 92104
...
-------------------------------------
-------------------------------------
Denise Lavell
Management Consultant
San Diego, CA 92131
-------------------------------------
-------------------------------------
Melvin Maxwell
City of San Diego
Liaison to the Chief
African-American Community
National City, CA 91950
-------------------------------------
-------------------------------------
Walden Miller, Ph.D
Researcher
HIV Neurological Research Center
2760 Fifth Avenue, SD 92103
San Diego, CA 92127
-------------------------------------
-------------------------------------
=====================_=a====~___=====
Timothy R Pestotnik, Esq.
Attorney
Luce Forward Hamilton
600 West Broadway 12600
San Diego, CA 92101
699-2514
=====================================
Dale Poe
AFSD Client Representative
-------------------------------------
-------------------------------------
Pamela B. Smith
District Manager, South Bay
Social Security Admn.
380 Third Ave., Suite B
Chula Vista, CA 91910
427-1970
-------------------------------------
-------------------------------------
Katherine O. Szem, C.P.A.
Accountant
Arthur Anderson & Co.
San Diego, CA 92101
--
-------------------------------------
-------------------------------------
Robyn Thaw, Assistant Vice President
Insurance Broker
Robert F. Driver Co.
1620 Fifth Avenue
San Diego, CA 92101
699-1357
------------------------------------
----------------.--------------------
David Zeiger, RPh
President/Pharmacist
Univ Pharmacy Health Ctr
3935 First Ave, 2nd Floor
San Diego, CA 92103
688-2273
------------------------------------
------------------------------------
-------------------------------------
-------------------------------------
Amy Somers, Ph.D
Executive Director
AIDS Foundation San Diego
4080 Centre Street
San Diego, CA 92103
686- 5050
-------------------------------------
-------------------------------------
--.r"'''~_~.'''-;----~';fnd:t'?;a~m'''''''-~ ,.
Sourcea of Fuada
FT1991-92 Actual
FT1992-93 Projected
--.. -T-.-".f'~--'~ ~.
' '. 'Iq ,
. .-- -"'-, " - - .-
Public Support:
Actual
FY1191-92
Projected
FY1192-93
San Diego CDBG
Other Cities CDBG
Irvine Foundation
United Way Grant
Care Act
Centers for Disease Control
Burroughs We11come
State of California
subtotal
233574
16549
120000
25000
126033
224804
30767
227997
1004724
238002
5000
110000
17500
426856
214388
22000
229546
1263292
Other Revenue:
subtotal
295212 300000
101413 100000
129583 112500
78081 80000
24147 12000
40559 30000
21543 60000
690538 694500
1695262 1957792
Individual Donors
Corporate Donors
United Way Designations
Special Even'ts
Client Fees (Housing)
Interest
Other
Total Funds
Government Sources of Funds
FY1991-92 Actual
Source Program Indirect Total
Centers for Disease Control 189669 35135 224804
State of California H 7061 10936 227997
Care Act 105954 20079 126033
HRSA 5670 2512 8182
FY1992-93 Projected
Source Program Indirect Total
Centers for Disease Control 186424 23862 210286
State of California 206753 22803 229556
Care Act 421091 5765 426856
AFSD is a leader in the San Diego community,
providing a wide range of prevention education and
support services to more than 75,000 people each
year. AIDS Foundation San Diego has a positive
impact on the health, well-being and dignityof th9u~
sands affected by HIV illness through Hum~n Service
Programs, such as the Food Bank and Tfuax'House(a
residential AIDsshelte,r). a.nd.othe. r,w.....o....g. r.'.a.. ms... such as scx::~L SERVICES PROGRAMS
the Public Benefits CI'nlc,Jeg. Se~c~/Client Edu-' .- ,- -."..-
'> >c'cm"'Ofksh'oPs, CASE MANAGEMENT: AFSD Case Managers help indi-
~ . ... ,!,~Jl' 'r~a,~d,j\ ~i~.~~.I,.s.a~n.~.::bt~~~;~,.t.~~~~~~~gf~~~~i:~:;~spe~a~;
'.\- '.1 - ;,;.~. $.1 ~~, L,'if,,}' "",,,' ~
. ", ',,;.> _' . "-';":>;""'*,", and'p)rr\munity organizations to identify pe' ope ,.Ie with HIV
1\}, / /.. ' ",e','" . f'~an'~"
,1>1"1' n": i ! 1...,1"~:""". ..!i-, f'~:'~<h 1I1nesslwho need special assistance, Case Managers pro-
\ tA.....,. \.'t' ,,".T ne Il.,., 'd h d' ' f h
'Y<ti)ff'l" I' (,- - ;:",-- :P(~,:~~..q:' VI ~~a compre enslve an ongomg as~sm~n.t 0 t e " ~.t) ,
~,~ .' , ''Hol.i1(:', ,c!lenl's oeed~, ensUring that'a!' ilPproprl'\taservlces and ',' "0 ':.: -,: :,~
,. ,;7~ ! . ,",,' progr;lITlS'are ,accessible.', ' ,,'<),:'- ,\,~ ," "f~BLlqBENEFITS GLI,t'IC:,voIUJlI~rs from lhe
. I ' ~u ,":, ,., ,,- " ,'" ' ,,' f~''"' I ". 'd '"
, ., _ r i ~v':"\"" " ~ 1:.1. ;n\'~\ .1~ d .- ~ ~ t ll::t." ,'" . tr' ' ~" pro ~1,9.:,Qil comrl)uOIty p~ e OllEt-oo-one con-
i ;J;,;, '~!t!' B"; '0 ", \.,:' ,:{,~,,,,, ~li;k" J, ,sulta..lii1ns.wlihl;lie[lts.o"ptJQIIG.bcill~fit~nutlement
_' .~, -:'~r1' ,VP\.l',~~I\W:' r~l .~rfJr"'rr P~Y~~M\~;:WO!l~mS'ThroUgh:tI1is~1Ycli~it\i~nlS(anbe
, f~, ,'~. ",e"19 I li"",,,,;p'i""dCa; .' ..,.. ua WI \., ~J',':.:'4~}0Qn&afepr pei!' mDle{~pfJled and
, "'llil\;l(q~s.\ ~':c9l'n(\!j ,10 wprldog WJ~ a li ,,' '~1l'~1l "If ~Wd ('if ~'faS\it6il."
.~~' -,)s!i,'ID,(' "\e~'ll,\;~,,' 'VVoh'i,-\~~tM~.~$;~'~'~;)' k"i!;>\,j~~.'. t<i;{,l; 'r~""/~{~~~ '
,'" ~-}l"f.4Y aro~~e.ps;r:nu~~, N ~rl'!,J [~~',B~cr~.,,:... ;'t,i );.~-:,~ .}~. : U?,,*ii~~';~-:'K~~~~'tty'.
109 tl uddyt<i, tfi~ motlier aI'ld,fjnoIDE:l' 0 ,her,lllill~,'!' _.' , '('-;.;: ,'~ , . ' '><~""';t" ","
, , i .,'~:(f~~tl;;~:/ ",~, ;:,i!'t~; ;,;,.:,> :,Y ; ?;',,~>~." ,;;'-~,",' ~' ,J c~'.' : . ,,>> .
!"', -.'. . "..~:.
The AIDS epi-
demic touches
us all. Whether
through the loss of a
friend or loved one, the
death of someone fa-
mous, or the changes
that HIV illness has
wrought on our every-
day behavior, this dis-
ease has altered our lives forever.
AIDS Foundation San Diego, founded to fight
against HIV illness, provides services and comfortwith
dignity to those directly affected by HIV illness, and
conducts educational outreach programs to help pre.
vent the spread of HIV.
AIDS Foundation San Diego could not exist \vithout
the hundreds of volunteers who generously give of their
time, skill and expertise. Their collective efforts represent
hundreds of thousands of dollars annual Iv. Whether work-
ing directly with clients, answering the lnformation Hot-
lines or providing administrative assistance, these dedi-
cated volunteers afe at the forefront of the AIDS crisis.
AIDS Foundation San Diego, we clrc people helping
people affected by HIV,
If you are in a room
of more than 200
people, there is a
very good chance
that one or more of
those individuals are
infected with HIV.
AIDS FOUNDATION SAN
DIEGO. PEOPLE HELPING
PEOPLE LIVE POSITIVELY.
jse, a renuvated Vicloridn Ilume,
bUSing for homeless Pt'IYlIlS dis-
: Two specially-equipped vans pro-
\ clients to and from medic<H appoint-
'ad Bank and other social serVices. One
6rth County. linking residents lothe many
Ie at the central San Diego location,
!'
'~i0{lrXt~,,:
,...,
I,'..
.~~.
" '~~\"',':.'"
.-.. >>" .
.'~
Ca\[' -'[allaS('/1 Irdl' il/dil'idllal.1
il/1(/ fil/llilin lI'itllll1('dica!, fillilllcial
dlld C1IlOtiolla/ <I.\I'('ct,>
of /ll\' i/ll/('I.\,
'-'.- ..
, ,
~. ..,
~.
'~l~ ...
'O'O'l~
ii',
III
~'-~.;' .
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
FUNDING APPLICATION FOR 1993-94
ProgramlProject Name: Chula Vista High School Playing Field Renovation
Name of Organization: American Youth Soccer Organization (A YSO)
Contact Person: Charlie Frice, Regional Commissioner A YSO
Address: CA 91910
1. Amount of Funding Requested $7,070
2. Amount of 1992-93 CDBG Funding: $00.00
3. If this is an existing program, how many years
has it served Chula Vista residents?
11 years
4. Is this program physically located in Chula Vista?
Yes
5. Describe the main goal (s), objectives, and activities of your organization:
The American Youth Soccer Organization (A YSO), founded in 1964, is a national
nonprofit, volunteer organization. As a Regional Chapter, Chula Vista follows national
goals and objectives. The A YSO is based on the premise that everyone plays. Many
sports organizations turn away children who are not competitive or who cannot afford
the registration fee. A YSO's goal is to give every youth, between the ages of 5 and 15,
regardless of playing experience and economic status, the opportunity to play soccer.
The objectives of the organization include building leadership skills, and giving
children positive reinforcement through positive coaching techniques.
A YSO operates a structured soccer program that runs from August through March.
Practice meets twice a week and games are on Saturdays.
6. Describe the specific program for which funds are requested:
A YSO, in cooperation with the Chula Vista High School, has put together a multi-year
plan to renovate the playing fields between K & L Streets and adjacent to 5th Avenue.
(See attachment)
7. Why is this program needed in Chula Vista?
Chula Vista, as many other cities in the United States, faces a socio-economic crisis. One
characteristic of this crisis is that our young people are falling into the margins of the
system. Many of them engage in criminal, drug and gang activity. We want to prevent
the number of at-risk youth from entering into such activity.
Supervised recreational and athletic activity helps our young people develop leadership
skills. We want to ensure that the youth in our community have an adequate playing
field, which we believe they deserve.
Throughout the year several thousand children use the fields for sports and recreation.
Groups are constantly using the fields, including YMCA soccer, Little League baseball,
Pop Warner football, A YSO soccer (900 children), the Girls and Boys Club, and the High
School students. As the number of children in the area grows, so does the demand on
the playing fields. Time and usage are beginning to take toll on the quality and safety
of the existing fields.
8. Who will be providing the services? Briefly describe qualifications of key staff
and indicate their level of education/training:
The American Youth Soccer Organization's Chula Vista Region 290 will be providing
the services. Both Charlie Frice, Regional Commissioner, and Gary Cheek, Assistant
Commissioner, have undergone extensive training that qualifies them to oper<j.te the
soccer program and work with young people. They have been acting as commissioners
for over two years and have been involved in A YSO for over three years. Other board
members have been volunteers for 8 years and longer. There are no paid staff; all
referees and 70 coaches are volunteers who are also trained by A YSO.
9. Program budget: total: $7.070
Sprinklers
Stolans
Grass Seed
Mise Roundup
Equipment
CDBG
$2,860
$2000
$910
$300
$1000
$7,070
Subtotal
10. Specify exactly how the COBG funds will be used:
CDBG funds will be used to replace existing rotary pop-up sprinkler heads with Hunter
gear driven heads, install approximately 180,000 square feet of Hybrid Bermudagrass
stolans, overseed selected areas, and purchase necessary equipment. All the work will
be done by volunteers.
11. Please list the name and amount of other secured or potential sources of funding
for this specific program:
We have secured $500 from Laid Law and have no other potential sources of funding.
A YSO, through fundraising efforts, candy sales, have purchased a mover tractor for
Chula Vista High School for maintenance. We also purchased goals, nets, concession,
and referee tents.
12. Do you anticipate needing CDBG funding for this program in subsequent years?
Yes.
If yes, how much funding will be needed each year?
1994-95 $6228 1995-96 ~ 1996-97 $2758
13. Who will be served by your program and what are the boundaries of your service
area?
Many young people throughout Chula Vista will be served by the renovation including,
· Chula Vista High School students
. A YSO soccer (900 children)
. Little League baseball
· Girls and Boys Club
14. How do people find out about your program? How do you do outreach?
Prior to the start of the season in August, flyers and posters announcing registration are
distributed through the local schools, Star News, local stores, and public facilities.
15. Do you assist clients to get to your program site or provide services out in the
community?
No.
16. For this specific program for which CDBG is requested, estimate the total number
of:
a. Total clients served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94 900 A YSO Y()Uth and others listed under #13
1992-93 890 A YSO youth and others listed under #13
1991-92 875 A YSO youth and others listed under #13
b. Chula Vista residents served or estimated to be served:
1993-94 Same
1992-93 Same
1991-92 Same
17. What methods will you use to account for the income level and other
demographic information on your clients?
We maintain a name and address list of all soccer players, help parents who cannot
afford the registration fee with a sliding scale program, and assist parents search for
outside economic help in order to meet the registration fee. In addition, we coordinate
with schools and the County Department of Social Services. MMC Project will provide
technical assistance.
~~7~~~;:: R:VE~~::
------------------
ie~:s:7z:~:~ =ees
S~C~S:~2 a~: :o~t~ibu~i0~S
:~. ~~nc ;aisi~s 'Receipts
~~. Inte~es: Inceme
:~. :~l~~~a: ~x~~a~se ~ec~~;:s
io~rnam€~~/P~aye~ ~a~:~
: S. 2::-:2- _ -.:cme
~C:~~ ~:::w2:eG Reve~~e~
::~:~A::: :Xp:~~:~~q:S
----------------------
.,
.,.
:lav:::e:-.:s :: ~YSC
"
.. .
F~r.: ~2.S:~; ~xpe~se~
~~~::::::s/~~aye~s ; 8f::~~a~s
S::ce- E~~::lme~..
:':e:: ~x:le~ses
P::y-c~. Exper.ses
Awarcs ~ .-~;~:es
Pos:a ~c ~ - :
~ravel!Tele~ho~e/~ee:ings
Newslelters, Ir. 8oo~, PhotOS
c
~!
"
-:;.
4&.
,"
'.
48.
49.
50.
:: ::".::5
51.
"
Filed Assets P"r:naSeS
::l:.
~~l:~~a~ :x~~a~ge :xpe~ses
~c~:name~:/Playe- ~ar.ps
~-epai: Expe~ses
6:.
9C. C:~e~ EX:lenses
,.".-'
J~'"
:s::matec :xpe~~it~!es
:s:~[~:eC :a:~ ~~:-ea::
~~E~ICAN ~~~;~ s:::~~ 2q~AN!ZA;::';
!992"~3 ANNUAL BU~G:~
~E~:O~ 29C
81;1'Ir.::--
"",,-
$40,COO.00
SC.OC
~2t.~SO.~C
$O.OC
$0.00
!:.OO
$0 .~O
$66 ,~5~ ,00
$8,750.0C
E,CS~.O~
*,.. "l't: 1'11'1
~.. ..". Vv
!8::
!3 ,:50 .OC
$0.00
S3,;60.00
S4CQ,QC
s3 .;80 .CO
$3,000.00
$2,320.00
sO.OO
Sc.oO
*" ^"
..",""
5C. OC
n.coc.oC
~~:,~7S.~C
$:4,87S.0~
A""'.'C
$37 .n7 .:C
'25~. ~C
~2:.?~4.:Q
S3,. Q'
~c.o~
i~ ,.-
~: :: ""
tf ~ ..~,
t"1 ~ 1" Q C
~, . -" '" . . "
i; , 27:: . : ~
~: (l . :. 92 . ~~,
i: . ? ~ ~ . ~:
t' ;~,~ . c
,,~ . -" .
~ ~ ,..,..
3: ,~86 . ~ 3
$?:t.h
\7477'
13.4:: .07
*' ^' ~ ""
.. . ~ . .' . ~ -
$~.:~
!O ~,.
I:
~: , ~;
L.1:'
~4 t . ~ ~ 8 go::
i: S . 7 ~:
:'.'~R ;
"\ ,,~~
_'.h_'
~'~~~:.
~: . 5:,~. 50
~!~5C,O~:
~. ~1' "':)'
" . , ' . ~ .-
I, i32. 9"'
:1' ""
$: r.r
~: ::
".
i 2 ~; , ~
. "
$2."" "
'!: ,977 .~~'
. H'J~
.,.
^^ .
<C.
t:,O:
. ~32: . ~? \
Ie: .1'
t" ,.,.., "1"1
.....".-
I $~ ~ ~ ...,
$: . ~O:
$: ""
tl' -,-
.....".
"
'"
.,
L .7~:.
~:, , : : ~
: $4 ,8~,:,."';
AYSO REGION 290
1992-93 BOARD OF DIRECTORS
REGIONAL COMMISSIONER
CHARLIE FRICE
ASST. REGIONAL COMMISSIONER
CHIEF COACH
CHIEF REFEREE
ASST. CHIEF REFEREE
TREASURER
SECRETARY/SAFETY DIRECTOR
REGISTRAR
PUBLICITY DIRECTOR
PICTURE REPRESENTATIVE
UNIFORM COORDINATOR
ASST. UNIFORM COORDINATOR
SCHEDULER
AWARDS & TROPHIES
SNACKBAR COORDINATOR
FIELD COORDINATOR
DIV 2 BOYS REPRESENTATIVE
DIV 2 GIRLS REPRESENTATIVE
DIV 3 BOYS REPRESENTATIVE
DIV 3 GIRLS REPRESENTATIVE
DIV 4 BOYS REPRESENTATIVE
DIV 4 GIRLS REPRESENTATIVE
DIV 5 BOYS REPRESENTATIVE
DIV 5 GIRLS REPRESENTATIVE
DIV 6 BOYS REPRESENTATIVE
DIV 6 GIRLS REPRESENTATIVE
DIV 7 BOYS REPRESENTATIVE
DIV 7 GIRLS REPRESENTATIVE
GARY CHEEK
ROGER CAZARES
LLOYD FLOROW
TIM KEERAN
KAREN SHIPP
DeANN CHEEK
MARY WOCHASKI
TIM KEERAN
DeANN CHEEK
LIZ .OLIVER-SWAN
GLORIA SUMPTER
LLOYD FLOROW
MIKE SHIPP
BRIAN RELAFORD
GABRIEL TORRES
GLORIA SUMPTER
KAREN MARSHALL
LLOYD FLOROW
MARIA BOWMAN
ROGER CAZARES
MIKE SHIPP
GARY CHEEK
GLORIA SUMPTER
LAURIE FLOROW
DEAN SAIKI
LAURIE FLOROW
DEAN SAIKI
*A1l members are Chula Vista Residents
WP/92BD
426-7241
482-1070
422-0432
482-1864
427-1580
422-2434
482-1070
426-7647
427-1580
482-1070
422-7770
426-3822
482-1864
422-2434
422-1492
691-0188
426-3822
420-4178
482-1864
427-1619
422-0432
422-2434
482-1070
426-3822
482-1864
421-6185
482-1865
421-6185
ANNUAL BUDGET
1993 BUDGET
SPRINKLERS
STOLANS
GRASS SEED
MISC ROUNDUP, ECT
EQUIPMENT
110 EA @
80,000 SF @
$ 26.00 EA $
2000.00 LOT
910.00 LOT
300.00 LOT
1000.00 LOT
2860.00
2000.00
910.00
300.00
1000.00
TOTAL 1993 BUDGET $7070.00
1994 BUDGET
SPRINKLERS
STOLANS
GRASS SEED
MISC ROUNDUP, ECT
EQIPMENT
78 EA @ $ 26.00 EA
80,000 SF @ 2000.00 LOT
700.00 LOT
500.00 LOT
1000.00 LOT
$ 2028.00
2000.00
700.00
500.00
1000.00
TOTAL 1994 BUDGET $6228.00
1995 BUDGET
SPRINKLERS
GRASS SEED
MISC ROUNDUP,ECT
EQUIPMENT
93 EA @ $ 26.00 EA
900.00 LOT
400.00 LOT
500.00 LOT
$ 2418.00
900.00
400.00
500.00
TOTAL 1995 BUDGET $4218.00
1996 BUDGET
SPRINKLERS
GRASS SEED
MISC ROUNDUP, ECT
EQUIPMENT
58 EA @ $ 26.00 EA
700.00 LOT
300.00 LOT
250.00 LOT
$ 1508.00
700.00
300.00
250.00
TOTAL 1996 BUDGET $2758.00
SITE PLAN
K Street
01
-
:T
:>
<
(J)
:J
C
(J)
-
-
-
,
1 99.3. (f)
. 0
~ ::r
0
0
-
, .
I 1 996:
L ~
I
(J) "T1
- 0
III 0
a. -
994 -. 0"
1 1:995 c III
3 -
. .
, -
L () OJ
0 ~
'. c '<
I 0" Ib
L Street
@
everyone play'
The A YSO philosophy guarantees that each child
will play at least half a game.
Our "Balanced Teams" concept assures that all
teams play in a healthy competitive atmosphere.
A YSO provides a sensible alternative for children
of all abilities to participate in youth sports.
A YSO's goal is for all children to have fun while
learning good citizenship and developing
physical fitness through soccer.
we Will help with
Our national program of support to local A YSO
Regions offers these unique advantages:
. Insurance Liability Policy
. Accident Reimbursement Plan
. Buyers Service
. Publicity and Fundraising
. Registration and Accounting
. Cultural Exchanges
a ramilq affair
A YSO is a volunteer organization. We encourage
the entire family to get involved.
A YSO trains its own coaches and referees too.
Clinics and training sessions assure
volunteers of the support necessary to
develop positive techniques for
working with youth.
AYSO publishes Soccer
Now Magazine. Packed full
of entertaining and impor-
tant soccer news, it is
mailed to each AYSO family.
-
It
j>
'"I
':
~""
~
r\ .
-
'f
" ., ....,l
- -, . ..- .
-~----- ~
.~ .-.~
....
~. - ~...--'" .~
.'.'"' ......~~-........................
--
If all this sounds good and
you are interested in becoming
part of A YSO
Contact:
A YSO Development. . . (800) 421-5700,
California residents call (800) 262-4234
CITY OF CIJOLA VISTA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
FUNDING APPLICATION FOR 1993-94
NOTE: THIS APPLICATION IS DUE NO LATER THAN MARCIli, 1993 AT 5
P.M. AT TIlE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT, 276 FOURTIl AVE., CHULA VISTA.
Program/Project Name:
Name of Organization: ARC - San Diego, Starlight Center
Contact Person: Anthony DeSalis Title Area Director
Vocational Rehabilitation/Work Activity Program
Address:
Chula Vista, CA 91911-3738
Telephone
I. Amount of Funding Requested:
$15,000
$ N/A
2. Amount of 1992-93 CDnG Funding:
3. If this is an existing program, how many
years has it served Chula Vista residents?
20 years
4. Is this program physically located in Chllla Vista?
Yes
5. Describe the main goal(s), objectives, and activities of your organization:
The Association for Retarded Citizens (ARC) - San Diego is a private, nonprofit organization dedicated to
providing education, training and employment opportunities to improve the quality of life for persons with
mental retardation. Incorporated in 1953, ARC-San Diego is the largest ARC in the country and currently
serves over 5,000 persons with developmental disabilities and their families.
Starlight Center facility was established in 1962. It is located in Chula Vista and is one of the many programs
offered by ARC-San Diego for South Bay residents. Starlight Center's ultimate goal is to help our clients attain
their highest level of independence. We believe this is best achieved through community integration and
activities focused on occupational and employment training programs. These programs include vocational
assessment and training, supervised placement in a community-based business and/or employment in ARC-
operated businesses.
In addition to the Starlight Center, ARC-San Diego has group homes in the South Bay area. The homes are
part of ARC-San Diego's residential program which is offered throughout the County. This goal of this
program is to help our clients develop independence through self-care, socialization, communication and daily
. ng skills.
6. Describe the specific program for which funds are requested: (If you are only
requesting funds for general organizational support, go to question #10).
ARC's Vocational Rehabilitation/Work Activity Program is a goal oriented program to develop functional skills
which enhance employability and job maintenance. The objective is to maximize an individual's independent
functioning through training in such areas as self care, communication skills, mobility training, and on-the-job
vocational training at a paid worksite within our community. VR/WAP places individuals with community-
based businesses. The VR/W AP program has successfully placed clients in a diversity of entry-level jobs at
Mary Kaye's Family Restaurant - Chula Vista, Alvarado Hospital, Red Lobster - North County Fair, San Diego
Convention Center, Liberty Recycling, Bigger Than Life, and A-I Storage.
7, Why is the program needed in Chula Vista?
This program will provide on-the-job vocational training to adults with developmental disabilities living in the
Chula Vista area. These valuable vocational training and placement services will help the developmentally
disabled become "taxpayers" instead of tax recipients. The program also provides employers with a trained
and dependable workforce.
8. Who will be providing the services? Briefly describe qualifications of key staff and
indicate their level of eduation/training:
Suoervisinl! Case Manal!er oversees the VR/WAP to ensure clients' needs are met. Training/experience
equivalent to a M.A. degree in a human care field, experience in client evaluation, record keeping, and
knowledge of physical/mental disabilities are required.
.Job Develooer (1/2 time) seeks job opportunities from community-based businesses for program participants.
Training/experience equivalent to an undergraduate degree, experience in sales, job placement/marketing are
required.
Lead Skills Trainer develops client instruction programs for the job coach. Training/experience equivalent
to an undergraduate degree in a human care field and 2 years experience in a human care field are required.
.Job Coach (1 oer 3 clients) directly supervises and instructs clients at the job site. This individual possesses
training/experience equivalent to an undergraduate degree.
9. Program Budget: Total: $126,780.00
(Include only those expenses directly related to the program for which funding is requested).
CDBG
PORTION
ARC
OTHER FUNDS
Salaries/Benefits
Rent/Utilities:
Equipment/Supplies
Program Expenses
Property & Liability Insurance
Administrative
$10,000.00
$ 1,000.00
0.00
$ 3,000.00
$ 1,000.00
0.00
$ 87,200.00
$ 3,060.00
$ 860.00
$ 2,160.00
$ 2,100.00
$ 16,400.00
Subtotals:
$15,000.00
$111,780.00
TOTAL
$ 97,200.00
$ 4,060.00
$ 860.00
$ 5,160.00
$ 3,100.00
$ 16,400.00
$126,780.00
10. Specify exactly how the CDBG funds will be used:
The requested CDBG funds represents less than 12 % of the entire budget for the VR/W AP program. The
majority of the requested monies from CDBG will be used to fund the job coach's salary. The monies will
also be used to pay for necessary program expenses. Payments are made according to regularly scheduled
payroll and bills received.
11. Please list the name and amount of other secured or potential sources of funding for
this specific program:
This program is partially funded by California Department of Vocational Rehabilitation, Department of
Habilitation-a division of Department of Vocational Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation, State Department of
Developmental Services, fund raising reports by the STAR LARCS, Fund raising efforts by the Starlight
Auxiliary, and United Way/CHAD. ARC-San Diego makes up any deficit. However, due to the state fiscal
crisis, funding has been capped resulting in insufficient funds to meet our community's needs. Presently, there
are 7 individuals on a waiting list for employment training because of current inadequate funding for staff and
program-related expenses. The CDBG grant will help us meet this need by allowing the program to hire
another job coach. Depending upon the clients' needs, it is anticipated, the additional CDBG funds will help
three to six more clients. Should additional funds become available, the monies will be used to provide staff
to serve additional clients not funded through existing sources.
Do you anticipate needing X>BG funding for this program in subsequent years?
Yes No
If yes, how much funding will '0-needed each year?
1994-95 $ iO 1995-96 $ 1996-97 $ Ji-
12.
13. Who will be served by your program and what are the boundaries of your service
area?
The program serves persons with developmental disabilities which are defined as substantial disabilities which
originate before the individual reaches the age of 18 years and continues, or is expected to continue,
indefinitely. It includes mental retardation, cerebral palsy; epilepsy, autism, and disabling conditions closely
related to mental retardation. Although Starlight Center is located in Chula Vista and primarily serves its
residents, the Center also provides services to National City, Bonita, Imperial Beach, Coronado, San Ysidro,
Sunnyside, Lincoln Acres, Sunny Vista, Linwood Hills, Cockatoo Grove, Castle Park, Otay, and Nestor.
14. How do people find out about your program? How do you outreach?
Most referrals come from the San Diego Regional Centers and Department of Rehabilitation (both of which
coordinate services for the mentally retarded in Southern California), social workers, Sweetwater and San
Diego City School Districts, and other community agencies.
Outreach is accomplished though public service announcements, newsletters, informational seminars sponsored
by ARC, and membership drives.
15. Do you assist clients to get to your program site or provide services out in the
community?
Starlight Center provides limited transportation services to and from the program site for individuals living in
ARC-SO residential centers with three ARC-owned vans. The VR/W AP program also has a mobility training
program which teaches individuals how to use public transportation to get to and from their work site.
16. Fo,- Ii ":.cdfk program for which COBG is requested, estimate the total number
of:
a, Total clients served or estimated to be served in:
VR/W AP
TOTAL ARC STARLIGHT CENTER
CLIENTS IN VOCATIONAL PROGRAMS
1993-1994
1992-1993
1991-1992
25
14
o
150
145
126
b. Chu1a Vista residents served or estimated to be served in:
VR/W AP
TOTAL ARC STARLIGHT CENTER
CLIENTS IN VOCATIONAL PROGRAMS
1993-1994
1992-1993
1991-1992
8
6
o
50
44
46
c. Low-income clients sel'ved or estimated to be served in:
All clients served by ARC can be defined as low-income.
17. What methods will you use to accollnt for the income level and other demographic
information on your clients?
Intake information, client service application, and client reimbursement services (verification is provided by
those entities paying for services) are used to confirm the client's income level.
PLEASE ATTACH THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
a) A PROGRAM BROCHURE OR FLYER (if you have one)
b) A CURRENT LIST OF YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS (one page)
c) A COMPLETE LIST OF CURRENT SOURCES OF REVENUE (one page)
~)
~rc
SAN DIEGO
Association For Retarded Citizens
San Diego
5384linda Vista Rd., Suite 100. San Diego, CA 92110-2693' (619) 574-7575
Richard B. Farmer, Ph.D., Executive Director Fax (619) 574-0317
East County, North County, North Shores,
San Diego City, South Bay Chapters
SOUTH BAY ADVISORY BOARD t1EHBERS
1992-1993
President
*Morris Coplan
633 Ramona Avenue, Spring Valley 92077
461~50a4
First Vice President
*Jerome Roebuck
1003 Mel~ose Avpnue, Chula Vista 9i9ll
420-2265
Second Vice President
Joan (olJk
777 Guava, Chula Vist~ 91910
Secretarv
*Lita Blackl%od
527 First Avenue, Chula Vista 91910
420-4602 (H)
474-3831 (l~)
Treasurer
*James Dowe 11
10304 Fairhill Drive, Spring Vel ley 92077
670-4243
**************~********************************************~******************
AP-C Board of Directors; Martha Brault
Alternate: Jerome Roebuck
****~***********************************~***w****~***********~***********~**~*
*~artha Brault ~85 Al1view Ct., Chula Vista 9191J 421-7165
*Jean Chapman 224 Elder, Chula Vista 91910 420-3603
David Johnson 908 Monterey Cou,t; Chula Vista 91911 420-8759
*Esperar2a Buelna 2915 Ridgeway Drive, ~Iational Ci~y 91950 470-5044
IITom Har.ron lalO Af]J.a Tibia, Chula Vista 91911 42"7-609~
LARC Pres~dent
Ari.dr22. J oher-~t::
~225 Old Orchard T~ne, co~ta 91902
470-3473
Auxiliarv Pr2sident
_.t-...__
Doris Irving
510 Douglas Stre~t, ChUl2 Vj:td ~191Q
421-5~7<
*
8€;lDtes I j:,J....en-~s) r~,:~t.i~;e G;" ram i'l cc::r2 p,'.o.....-jder'
Member of ARC - United States and ARC - California,
Sharing in the United Way of San Diego County
~
~rc
SAN DIEGO
Association For Retarded Citizens
San Diego
1280 Nolan Ave. . Chula Vista, CA 91911-3738. (619) 427-7524. Fax (619) 427-4657
South Bay Chapter. Starlight Center
Anthony DeSalis, Area Director
STARLIGHT CENTER LIST OF CURRENT SOURCES OF REVENUE
Name
Percentage
L
2.
State Department of Vocational Rehabilitation
Department of Habilitation - A Division of the
Department of Vocational Rehabilitation
State Department of Developmental Services
Fund raising efforts by The STAR LARCS
Fund raising efforts by the Starlight Auxiliary
United Way/CHAD
Sub-contract sales through work activity program
4.5
28.4
3_
4.
5.
6.
7.
49.4
1.1
l.l
l.l
14.4
Total
100%
Member ot ARC - United States and ARC - California,
Sharing ;n the United Way of San Diego County
~
~rc
SAN DIEGO
Association For Retarded Citizens
San Diego
5384linda Vista Rd.. Suite 100. San Diego. CA 92110.2693' (619) 574.7575
Richard B. Farmer, Ph.D., Executive Director Fax (619) 574-0317
East County, North County, North Shores,
San Diego City, South Bay Chapters
Association tor Retarde!! ~itiLmis-San megG
1992-1993 Budget SGmmary
INCOME:
Donations
Donations-United Way
Transfer-Special Olympic,
Fund Raising
State--Habili tation/Rehab.
State-Medi-Ca!
State-Regional Centcr
Parents/Others
Contract Income
luvestments
CHAPTERS
70,750
o
o
76.500
o
o
o
o
o
() . (l{)t. ~
OPERAlIONS
125.120
197,350
:103.000
410.720
4.553.670
J.708.000
7.275.80f)
191,5XO
2.7(,0.120
15i1.0ilil
Totalln(olllc 156,250 11).7~15.3(la
'l(PfI'~~ES:
Salaries
Benefits
Legal/Consult./Elc.
Supplies
Contract Supplies
Communications
Occupancy
Equipment
Vehicle Expen,c
Tri!vel/Collvenl.iQ'"'.
'r . .
..ral.Jllig
Progwm
'.','or!~:;h('\p Wi.,:C"
Du~,:;
l:~:;'l..! :~_r,;sil\':; ~x;;~n~:.:
!:J,:,~r~r:iJliC:1
! !;to;.;"I:'~t/Fir:::'l1('\:. C1lllll;\.s
CJlllP r...duno,)
l\'i.i'),:. & Eoa~',J [;"'1"~1l"'C::-'
Conungcncy Account
Total Expenses
o
II
o
(I
(I
o
8(1.5(10
il.\I00
:1
:1.ili,1l
! . .~I I, '
J().h(l
/I
\).()(J\J
o
IIS.7Sll
10.217.615
.i,(ln.')O(l
T27J120
4405Xf)
4 72. ~X(I
.113.8W
1.'110120
em. I 00
')4JOO(:
~.f.: ~ll
':
~~ . ~o
TOTAL
1~5.870
197.350
393.000
487.220
4.553.670
3.70s.aoo
7.2!).~OO
1~1.5XO
'2760.120
15'J.OOO
PERCENT
1.0%
1.0%
2.0%
2.4%
22.9%
18.6%
36.5010
I.U'I':'
13.9%
O.R%
I 1),921 ,6)11 t(lO.t)C'lc
10.217.615
3.m2.~OO
..t:7Jl:~)
440.580
472.no
111.XW'
1 \)<)0.620
220, Ion
544.()i)(J
2X.170
18 X,f)
~-,'l, .l,( H 1
:,~"1 1,111
70 l,~!)
;''),4ll:
:'. ,) \ J. ., i Ii ~
."-ul,Oh(:
.11: ,4()~i
:,~..:;4(}
40.045
19.5S4.lIll
51.4%
~5.5%
2.2/;?,
2.20/1i
2.4"/0
IJ)likl
10.0%
1.1 ;0
2.7%
~). It Ir,
n.?~~)
I ."~ I,..
4.1',';
P.I:.',
0, i\.(
1.51}(;
j.Y/o
c. ':Il~"
0.3'":;)
(J.2';~J
)()ll,lJ%
'I
~. i i)i I
1.;":: .1'11\
::: ',"10
Member of ARC - United States and ARC. California,
Sharing in the United Way of San Diego County
"
I~ ')(,;;
!"I).".'iJO
o
:l
)\/I,LtilJ
.~!).~ SO
....~~,dq
4<!.ll4S
J9.7~S.Jr.ll
INTRODUCING
~arc
SAN DIEGO
COMMUNITY BASED
SUPPORTED
EMPLOYMENT
ARC provides assistance
to employers in hiring long
term employees for hard to
fill positions. Targeted
employment areas include
high turn over work,
routine / repetitive jobs,
short or odd hour shifts and
minimum hour, entry level
jobs.
What
Can an Employer
Expect From ARC ?
ARC WILL...
... Recruit, screen and train
employees hired through
ARC.
... Provide a supervisor at
the job site to analyze and
learn the job, then train
the employees.
... Supervisors will remain
at the job site on a con-
tinuous basis to make sure
employee work is to stan-
dard.
BENEFITS TO THE
EMPLOYEE
... Real work for a real wage.
... Pride in one's work & one
self.
... Less reliance on public
assistance.
... Greater community
involvement.
BENEFITS TO THE
COMMUNITY
... Better understanding of
citizens with disabilities.
... Adds taxpayers to the tax
rolls.
... Social services with posi.
tive outcomes.
... Supports ADA legislation.
ARC Can Save
Employers $$$...
... Lower turnover means
higher productivity and
lower cost of recruiting,
screening, and training.
... ARC customers may be
eligible for savings
through Targeted Job Tax
Credit (we'll even do the
paperwork)
... Sub-minimum wage cer-
tificates can be used to
insure salaries reflect
actual work production
(and we do the paper
work!)
CITY OF CIIULA VISTA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
FUl\'1)ING APPLICATION FOR 1993-94
NOTE: THIS APPLICATION IS DUE NO LATER THAN MARClf I, 1993 AT 5
P.M. AT THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT, 276 FOURTH AVE., CHULA VISTA.
Program/Project Name: "Target Outreach"
Name of Organization: BOys & Girls Club of Chu1a Vista
Contact Person: w. Scott Mosher
Title Execut i ve Di rector
Address:~
Chu1a vista, CA 91911
Telephone
I. Amount or Funding Requested:
S 24,950
2. Amount or 1992-93 CDBG Funding:
S 9,000
3. If this is an existing program, how man)'
years has it served Chula VL'ita residents'?
years
4. Is this program physically located in Chula Vista?
Yes
5, Describe the main goal(s), objectives, and activities or your organization:
As cornrnunity leaders the Boys club of Chula Vista, founded in
1950 and the Girls club founded in 1969 merged to serve as a
single integrated unit. As a combined unit it has as its mission
"to provide positive activities and opportunities. to develop the
health, self-esteem and character of the youth of OUr cornrnunity,
enabling them to reach their fullest potentia!." club programs
are designed to help young people gain self-confidence, develop
sound minds and bodies and prepare to meet future responsibili-
ties.
6. Describe the specific program for which funds are requested: (If you are only
requestine funds for I:eneral orl!anizational support, go to question # 10).
As one of the largest non-profit youth organizations in the South Bay, the Boys
& Girls of Chula Vista provides services to over 2,300 youth annually. Of
children served, our statistics indicate that approximately 69\ come from low
income homes, 51\ are non-white, and 42\ live in single-parent households. This
statistical picture is a broad indicator of situations which are known to be
contributing factors in identifying potential at risk youth. With this immediate
access to this large base of potentially troubled youth, the Boys & Girls Club
of Chula Vista has a unique opportunity to offer intervention at both existing
facilities as well as on a community outreach basis. with this large base of
potentially troubled youth we will have the opportunity to work to prevent
disruptive behavior patterns.
7. Why is this program needed in Chula Vista?:
Today's headlines provide vivid backdrop to cold statistics. Children of low
income families, often living in abhorrent home conditions are finding
disruptive behavior as an alternative means of street acceptance. It is
estimated that there exists over 800 gang members in Chula Vista alone. With
positive role models often absent, drug and alcohol abuse rampant, interv~ntion
at the earliest possible time for high risk youth can make a dramatic differencp
in life choices. Positive interaction, personal quidance, and family support
offers the hope that a child headed for poor peer choices may be guided to
success in reaching hoped tor goals.
8. Who will be providing the services? Briefly describe qualifications of key
It is Our intention to bring a talented individual on board who
wi 11:
A. Have a m1n1mum BA/BS in Psychology/Sociology preferably
a trained counselor with a Masters Degree in an appro-
priate field.
B. Must have experience with youth and families.
C. Must have five years of practiced intervention
counseling experience and be familiar with outreach
program dynamics.
9. Program Budget: Total: $ 42,400
(Include only those expenses directly related to the program for which funding is
requested).
Salaries/Benefits:
CDBG
$24,950
OTHER FUNDS
$ 3,750
Rent/Utilities:
3,100
Equipment/Supplies:
3,900
Other Travel
1,000
Other Postage
Executive Management/
Other Supervisor:
600
4,500
Subtotals:
$24,950
$17,450
10. Specify exactly how the CDBC funds will be used:
The Boys & Girls Club intends to provide extensive match material and consultant
support the position. The Block Grant funds requested will be used for the
specific purpose of hiring a full time professional to serve as community
outreach intervention counselor. As stated earlier, the counselor will
essentially have two roles: (1) Direct case service counseling
(2) Serve as a community outreach resource specialist to help
distribute information which will help to identify youth
who are in a potentially "at risk" situation. and help
provide information concerning various types of treatmp-nt
modalities. family intervention and support.
II. Please list the name and amount of other secured or potential sources of
funding for this specific program:
Once this intervention counselor position is established, in the
flrst year of operation we anticipate that we will be broadening
the base of our financial support by asking other funders such as
the San Diego Community Foundation and San Diego United Way to
consider funding future parts of the program. We do, however,
ftel that we may need to come back to request decreasing support
over the next two year period.
12. Do you anticipate needing CDBC funding for this program in subsequent
)'ears? Yes X No
If yes, how much funding will be needed each year'!
1994-95$24,595 1995-96$ 18,446 1996-9759,223
13. Who will be served by your program and what are the boundaries of your
service area? It is our intention to provide:
A. Direct case services to "at risk"' youth ages 6-18 in the
Chula Vista Community.
B. To provide information and educational outreach support to
schools, police departments and other community based
organizations concerning identification and intervention
techniques.
14. How do people find out about your program? How do you do outreach?
With the help.of our devel~pment/public relations department at
th~ club we WIll mount an Information dissimination campaign
us~n? local media, direct mail marketing and informational
maIlIngs to community organizations to announce the arrival of
the new outreach intervention counselor position.
15. Do you assist clients to get to your program site or provide services Ollt ill the
community?
As a basic outreach service, we do not anticipate that site
transportation will be a major component of the delivery system.
For students of any of four surrounding schools, there does
however exist a free bus service to the club sites.
16. For this specific program for which CDBG is requested, estimate the total
number of:
a. Total clients served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94
1992-93
1991-92
2575
2500
2350
b. Chula Vista residents served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94 2450
1992-93 2375
1991-92 2140
c. Low-income clients served or estimated to be served in:
(low-income household is defined as follows: I person =$23,150; 2person =$26,450;
3person =$29,750; 4person =$33,050)
1993-94
1992-93
1991-92
1780
1750
1318
17. What methods will you use to account for the income level and other
demographic infonnation on your clients?
Our internal membership forms provide a detailed statistical
basis for information about the income level and other
demographic assessments about the Boys & Girls club Members
(ie: those who will be served as clients of this service.).
When services are provided to non-club members we will use
a statistical information data base such as that used with
the club members in order to achieve consistency in
measuring service statistics.
PLEASE ATTACH THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
a) A PROGRAM BROCHURE OR FLYER (if you have one)
b) A CURRENT LIST OF YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS (one page)
c) A COMPLETE LIST OF CURRENT SOURCES OF REVENUE (one page)
."
Current Sources of Revenue
~';~,
Fundraising 45%
Program Services 34%
United Way 9%
Grants 5%
Miscellaneous 5%
Membership 2%
4JV.l....... ... .......1................ .................... ......... ......~~.........,,~ .. .L......~~
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ADMINISTRATION
Paul Kapler
Pat Ables
Joe Matacia
Sue Welsh
Cathi Jamison
OPERATIONS
Martin Barros
Bob Fox
Xema Jacoboson
Ben Richardson
FINANCE
George Krempl
Royce Jensen
Joe Conte
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Sue Welsh
George Krempl
Paul Kapler
Martin Barros
cathi Jamison
Bob Fox
Ben Richardson
Joe Conte
Social recreation. The Boys & Girls Club
teaches youngsters lD get along with
peers, have fun, and make new friends.
Our program includes game rooms, cooed
activities, speda1 events, and outings.
Outdoor and environmemalc\lucalioll.
We offer programs designed to help chil-
dren interact positively with their naD1ral
environment by studying nature and by
enjoying it in outdoor activities.
Spccial programs for girls. The Boys &
Girls Club is especially concerned that
girls receive help in overcoming barriers
imposed by traditional and continuing gendcr discrimina-
tion. Girls spend most of their lives in settings that don't
prepare them for independence.
Through programs like Operation Smart, which
focuses on special training in math and science, the Boys &
Girls Qub of Chula VISta encourages girls to acquire skills,
gain confidence, become self-reliant, and practice leadership
Programs that (jive
I(ids Tools for
Positive Living
Programs at the Boys & Girls Qub can be
divided into six core areas:
Personal and educational development. We pre-
pare kids for responsible adulthood, helping them
lD develop basic educational and work skills.
Goalsjor Growth is a program which trains young
people in the art of goal-selling. They learn how
to set and attain goals, and are thus empowered
to take control of their lives.
Our staff helps kids to resolve crises in
their lives, Through programs like Smart Moves,
we teach them to identify and resist pressures that
can lead to substance abuse and premature sexual
activity, The Qub offers tutoring. oounseling, scholarships,
refenals, special interest classes, and vocational guidance.
Citizenship and leadership development. We encourage
youngsters to participate in leadership of th~,Qub. We
provide opportunities for making real decisions, build-
ing seIf-oonfidence, and developing leadership abilities.
Culnrra1 emichrnenLOur goal is to broaden the hori-
zons of children and youth,
exposing them to the arts
and fostering multicultural
understanding.
Health and physical educa-
tion. We want to help kids
to develop and maintain
good health and physical
fitness. our Stepping
StoIU:\' program, for exam-
ple, offers instruction in
good sportsmanship and
skills development and
builds an appreciation for
physical activities.
The programs at the Boys & Girls Qub help young
people to gain self-confidence. to pursue an educa-
tion, lD develop sound minds and bodies, and to prepare
for successful careers. OUr strategy is to provide children
a sense of competence, a sense of usefuiness. a sense of
belonging, and a sense that they have the power to over-
corne whatever barriers prevent them from leading pro-
ductive lives.
The Boys & Girls
Club of Chula
Vista serves over
2,300 children a year.
We serve everyone,
but we offer special
help to kids not
served elsewhere,
who don't have other
opportunities-kids
from low-inoome
families, and kids
that have only one
parent at home.
The Povver of Working Together
We need your help. The prob-
lems kids of Chula Vista face
cannot be solved without the help of the
community-and especially of indi-
viduals. We must work together to
support the Boys & Girls Club.
The approximate cost of sup-
porting a child for one year is $266. We
rely heavily on the generosity of those
who believe in the Club and the solutions
it offers to the youth we serve,
You can help. Our staff is sup-
plemented by volunteers whom we
depend upon for tutors, coaches, and
many of our other key services.
You can also help either by
offering financial assistance or by volun-
teering time in organizing the Club's spe-
cial events and projects. You can make
annual monetary contributions, memorial
gifts, or remember the Boys & Girls Club
of Chula Vista in your will.
Join the Club-becoll1e' .1 vdlued supporter.
To find out marc duoul how Y<',' (dll hdp, <"dl-121--10 II.
~"'JIL;(.t//' --'~\....r: ~--.~~A.~ -1"'-'-'~
CITY OF CIIULA VISTA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
FUNDING APPLICATION FOR 1993-94
NOTE: TillS APPLICATION IS DUE NO LATER THAN MARCH 1,1993 AT 5
P.M. AT THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT, 276 FOURTH AVE., CHULA VISTA.
Program/Project Name:
EIJUCATION ENHANCEMENT PRCGRAM
Name of Organization:
OOYS & GIRIS CWB OF CHULA VISTA
Contact Person: W. S=tt Mosher
Title Executive Director
Address:
Chula Vista, CA 91911
Telephone
1. Amount of Funding Requested:
$ 15,721
2. Amount of 1992-93 CDBG Funding:
(This is a new program)
3. If this is an existing program, how many
years has it served Chula Vista residents'?
$ 9,000
years
4. Is this program physically located in Chub Vista'?
Yes
5. Describe the main goal(s), objectives, and activities of your organization:
The mission of the Boys & Girls Club of Chula Vista is to provide positive
activities and opportunities to develop the health, self esteem and
character of the youth of our canmuni ty, enabling them to reach their
fullest potential.
This is accomplished through activities including homework help/tutoring,
substance abuse prevention, specialized health education programs, fine
arts, social recreation and individual team sports. This is augmented
by several special interest group clubs and youth develq;rnent programs.
6. Describe the specific program for which funds are requested: (If you are only
requesting funds for general organizational support, go to question # 10).
An Education Enhancement Program designed to assist elementary and junior high
school students needing special help in school 1r.Qrk, particularly Math, Science,
Social studies and Reading. These students will be identified by teachers and
other school District persormel and referred to this program for assistance.
'Ihe program will also allow for the expansion of existing Etlucational programs
currently being conducted at the Boys & Girls Club of Chula Vista.
An Education O:>-ordinator will develop the program and activities to facilitate
a tutortng of the students, develop a volunteer base & establish a Mentor program
(contJ.nued on a separate sheet)
7. Why is this program needed in Chula Vista?:
'Ib help curtail the school drop-out rates in this a:xrmunity, by establishing
consistent study habits with students and by developing a positive reaffimation
of the education process. 'Ib help develop self esteem and a sense of worth to bring
out a student' s full potential for growth into adulthood.
8. Who will be providing the services? Briefly describe qualifications of key
staff and indicate their level of education/training:
Under the direction of the Director of Operations, an Etlucation Coordinator and
a:xrmunity volunteers will provide the services, in cooperation with the Chula
Vista School Distri<i:tt.
'Ihe Coordinator will have a B.S. or B.A. in Etlucation or related field, must have
3-5 years experience 1r.Qrking in education system, should have ability to work and
collaborate with other carununity agencies and should have knowledge of education
trends and training techniques.
9. Program Budget: Total: $ 34,042
(Include only those expenses directly related to the program for which funding is
requested) .
Salaries/Benefits:
CDBG
$ 10,435
OTHER FUNDS
$ 13,035
Rent/Utilities:
4,036
4,036
Equipment/Supplies:
1,250
1,250
Other
Other
Other
Subtotals:
$ 15,721
$ 18,321
6. =ntinued.
using local high school students.
10. Specify exactly how the CDBe funds will be used:
CDBG funds would be used to fund staff position to oonduct prograrrming;
space oosts; and to purchase equipnent and supplies for program implementation.
II. Please list the name and amount of other secured or potential sources of
funding for this specific program:
Cbntributions/Fundraising
united Way
$9,160
$9,161
12. Do you anticipate needing CDne funding for this program in subsequent
yeal"S? Yes No X
If yes, how much funding will be needed each year?
1994-95 $ 1995-96 $ 1996-97 $
13. \Vho will be served by your program and what arc the boundaries of your
sCl"vice area? Elementary and junior high school students, identified by the
Chula Vista School District Staff, who will need this program. Our service
area is within the city of Chula Vista.
14. How do people find out about your program? How do you do outreach?
Through our current membership roles, me City Parks & Recreation Brochure;
refe=als by teachers and other school personnel, agency brochure and newsletter
and by extensive canmunity outreach. Transportation is provided from nwnerous
schools through the Transportation Latchkey Coalition in oonjunction with the
School District.
15. Do you assist clients to get to your program site or provide services out in the
community? Some transportation is provided by out TLC program as described
above.
'""
,
16. For this specific program for which CnBG is requested, estimate the total
number of:
a. Total clients served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94 2575
1992-93 2500
1991-92 2350
b. Chura Vista residents served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94 2450
1992-93 2375
1991-92 2140
c. Low-income clients served or estimated to be served in:
(low-income household is defined as follows: I person =$23, 150; 2person=$26,450;
3person=$29,750; 4person=$33,050)
1993-94 1780
1992-93 1750
1991-92 1504
17 _ What methods will you use to account for the income level and other
demo~raphic information on your clients'!
Through our regular membership application process.
PLEASE A-ITACH THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
a) A PROGRAM BROCHURE OR FLYER (if you have one)
b) A CURRENT LIST OF YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS (one page)
c) A COMPLETE LIST OF CURRENT SOURCES OF REVENUE (one page)
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CHULA VISTA
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ADMINISTRATION
Paul Kapler
Pat Ables
Joe Matacia
Sue Welsh
Cathi Jamison
OPERATIONS
Martin Barros
Bob Fox
Xema Jacoboson
Beh Richardson
FINANCE
George Krempl
Royce Jensen
Joe Conte
~XECUTIVE COMMITTEE
Sue Welsh
George Krempl
Paul Kapler
Martin Barros
cathi Jamison
Bob Fox
Ben Richardson
Joe Conte
Current Sources of Revenue
'I':
<~
Fundraising 45%
Program Services 34%
united Way 9%
Grants 5%
Miscellaneous 5%
Membership 2%
Programs that (jive
I(ids Tools for
Positive Living
Programs at the Boys & Girls Club can be
divided into six core areas:
Personal and educational development. We pre-
pare kids for responsible adulthood, helping them
to develop basic educational and work skills.
GoalsJor Growth is a program which trains young
people in the art of goal-setting. They learn how
to set and attain goals, and are thus empowered
to take control of their lives.
Our staff helps kids to resolve crises in
their lives. Through programs like Smart Movei',
we teach them to identify and resist pressures that
can lead to substance abuse and premature sexual
activity. The Club offers tutoring. counseling. scholarships,
referrals, specia1 interest classes, and vocational guidance.
Citizenship and leadership developmCllt. We encourage
youngsters to participate in leadership of the Club. We
provide opportunities for making real decisions, build-
ing self-{'()nfidence, and developing leaders!lip abilities.
Cultural enrichment Our goal is to broaden the hori-
zons of children and youth,
exposing them to the arts
and fostering multiculturaI
understanding.
Health and physical educa-
tion. We want to help kids
to develop and maintain
good health and physical
fitness. Our Stepping
Stones program, for exam-
ple, offers instruction in
good sportsmanship and
skills development and
builds an appreciation for
physical activities.
The programs at the Boys & Girls Club help young
people to gain self-confidence, to pursue an educa-
tion, to develop sound minds and bodies, and to prepare
for successful careers. OUr strategy is to provide children
a sense of competence, a sense of usefulness, a sense of
belonging, and a sense that they have the power to over-
come whatever barriers prevent them from leading pro-
ductive lives.
The Boys & Girls
Club of Chula
Vista serves over
2,300 children a year.
We serve everyone,
but we offer special
help to kids not
served elsewhere,
who don't have other
opportunities-kids
from low-income
families, and kids
that have only one
parent at home.
."".
"
,..
,"
Social recreation. The Boys & Girls Club
teaches youngsters to get along with
peers, have fun, and make new friends
Our program includes game rooms, cooed
activities, special events, and outings.
Outdoor and environlllenlall\lllcation
We offer programs designed to help chil-
dren interact positively with their natutal
environment by studying natute and by
enjoying it in outdoor activities.
Special programs lor girls, The Boys &
Girls Club is especially concerned that
girls receive help in overcoming barriers
imposed by traditional and continuing gender discrimina-
tion, Giris spend most of their lives in senings that don't
prepare them for independence.
Through programs like Operallon Smart, which
focuses on special training in math and science, the Boys &
Girls Club of Chula VISta encourages girls to acquire skills,
gain confidence, become self-reliant, and practice leadership.
~.\
The Povver of Working Together
-
We need your help. The prob- You can help. Our staff is sup-
lems kids of Chula Vista face plememed by volunteers whom we
cannot be solved without the help of the depend upon for tutors, coaches, and
community-and especially of indi- many of our other key smires.
viduals. We must work together to You can also help either by
support the Boys & Girls Club. offering financial assistance or by volun-
The approximate cost of sup- teering time in organizing the Club's spe-
porting a child for one year is $266. We cial events and projects. You can make
rely heavily on the generosity of those annual monetal)' contributions, memorial
who believe in the Club and the solutions gifts, or remember the Boys & Girls Club
it offers to the youth we serve. of Chula Vista in your will.
Join the Club-become eI veil Lied supporter.
III find oul 110rc "bollt how YUCI Cd Il hdp, l',,1I .j~1-40 I I,
,
~,. '
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRA]\"T
FUNDING APPLICA nON FOR 1993-94
MhR 1993
p.~'seived
C('lmmur.ity Ce'Js\opm~nt
Deprt:ner.t
NOTE: THIS APPLICATION IS DUE NO LATER THAN MARCH 1,1993 AT 5
P.M. AT THE CIIT OF CHULA VISTA, COMMUNIIT DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT, 276 FOURTH AVE., CHULA VISTA.
Program/Project Name: PROJECT SAFEHOUSE (PSH) AND THE HOTLINE
Name of Organization: Center for Women' s Studies <. Services (CWSS)
Contact Person:
Laurine Baxter
Title Director!t Project Safehouse
Address:
Telephone
I. Amount of Funding Requested:
$ 10,000
2. Amount of 1992-93 CDnG Funding:
$
5,000
3. If this is an existing program, how man)'
years has it served Chula Vista residents?
25
years
4. Is this program physically located in Chula Vista?
No
5. Describe the main goal(s), objectives, and activities of your organization:
CWSS is a 501 (c)3 nonprofrt organization established In 1969 to improve the legal, social, political, economic and cu~ural
status of women in society
Our goals are to assist them in overcoming disadvantages due to poverty, domestic violence, victimization, gender discrim-
ination or other kinds of discrimination by providing' A 24-hour Hotline for victims Qf rape or family violence, individual and
group crisis counseling, hospital accompaniment for rape and family violence vic1ims, a legal clinic offering all battered women
assistance with acquiring temporary restraining orders, divorce and court accompaniment, emergency she~er (Project Safe.
house), referral to legal, medical and financial assistance, and community education on sexual assau~ and family violence
prevention. The majorrty of our clients (75%) are in the low to moderate income category and services are either free or
charged for on a sliding fee scale basis.
6. Describe the speeific program for which funds are requ('sted: (If you are only
requ('sting funds for g('neral organizational support, go to question # 10).
1) PSH: Located In the South Bay area. PSH IS an emergency refuge for women and their children who, as victims of
domestic violence, require immediate relocation in a safe, protected environment Clients usually admitted wrthin 1 day; motel
& food vouchers available as needed 10-15 clients in residence at any given time, lenglh of stay is normally 7-10 days PSH
provides safe shelter, food, clothing, group and individual counseling, children's peer play, advocacy, bus tokens, information
on education, employment opportunities, referrals, assistance with temporary restraining orders and other legal services
2) HOTLINE: Our Rape Cnsis Center maintains a 24-hour emergency Hotline for victims of rape & domestic violence.
Services include counseling. hosprtal accompaniment, referral to our Legal Clinic and/or Project Safehouse, and serves as a
major source of referral to other organizations and services which may be needed
7. Why is this program needed in Chula Vista~:
CWSS provides the only Safehouse serving the Chula Vista area Greg Pickett, Crime Analyst for the Crty of Chula Vista
Police Department reports the fOllowing statistics for Chula Vista in Calendar Year 1992
Forcible Rape (includes attempts) 51 Domestic Violence Calls 993
Sex Cnmes 237 Domestic Violence Cases 1804
SANDAG, reporting for the entire county of San Diego, reports that there was a 34% increase in reported incidence of
domestic violence during the first six months of 1992
Thirty-six clients served by PSH are projected to come from Chula Vista and a minimum of 50 Hotline clients were identified as
coming from Chula Vista Added together these 86 people represent 17% of the budget presented below
8. Who will be providing the services~ Brieny describe qualifications of key
staff and indicate their leyel of education/training:
Laurine Baxter, PSH Director for 3 years BA in Behavioral SCience. Ten years experience in the field.
Gina Biagini, PSH Case Worker BA in Social Work 2 years experience at shelter Bilingual Eng.lSpanish
Kay Young, Counselor BA degree new to the field wrth some vol expo at the shelter Bilingual :Eng.l-Spanish.
Volunteers: approximately 60 trained who have completed a minimum of 50 hours of state mandated training on domestic
violence and sexual assault A number of these volunteers are bilingual: English-Spanish / English/Asian.
Overall Program Supervision provided by Laurie Mackenzie: MFCC, Rape Crisis Center Director and current
Intenm Management Coordinator fOf CWSS Twenty years experience
9, Program Budget: Total: $ 146,641
(Include only those expenses directly related to the program for which funding is
requested).
CDBG OTHER FUNDS
Salaries/Benefits $ 3,500 $72,688
Rent & Utilities $ 1,500 $16,967
Equipment/Supplies $ 250 $ 1,800
Other: Food $ 2,000 $ 17,600
Other: Printing/Education $ 500 $ 1,386
Other: Temporary Shelter $ 250 $ 1,600
Other: HotlinelTelephone $2.000 $24.600
Subtotals $10,000 $136,641
10. Specify exactly how the COBG funds will be used:
We have attempted to prorate costs of program operation for each category listed In 9. Program Budget. to represent
services provided for crtlzens of Chula VIsta Most request categories fall below the actual percent of clients projected to be
seen from Chula Vista SalarieslBenefits will cover partial cost of a person fa provide both individual and group counseling
Equipment money will be spent on a printer for the shelter; Printing/Education will be spent on producing a brochure to be
used in outreach and community awareness; Temporary Shelter is for a portion of the cost of emergency use of vouchers for
food and motel accommodations, required when the shelter is full. Rent, Utilrties and Food are self explanatory.
II. Please list the name and amount of other secured or potential sources of
funding for this specific program:
Unrted Way of San DIego
$59,741
State Grants
$38,700
Crty of La Mesa
$ 10,000
I ndividual Gifts
$28 200
Total
$136,641
12. Do you anticipate needing COBG funding for this program in subsequent
years? Yes X No
If yes, how much funding will be needed each year?
1994-95 $ 10 _ 000 1995-96 $ 10.000 1996-97 $ 10.000
13. Who will be served by your program and what are the boundaries of your
service area?
PSH and the Hotline provide service to the entire County of San Diego including the unincorporated areas
The populations to be served are primarily low-moderate income' women and their children who are victims of sexual assault
and family violence.
14. How do people find out about your proeram? How do you do outreach?
Local police who are responding to domestic violence calls distribute information cards wrth numbers for counseling services
& the CWSS Hotline number 'Sexual Assault Response Team" (SART) protocol. stipulates that a Rape Crisis Advocate
(e.g, a trained CWSS staff or volunteer) respond to all sexual assault victims at hosprtals for the evidenciary exam Hotline &
SART are in the whrte & yellow pages of the phone book. Direct referrals come from other social service agencies and
individuals.
Outreach programs are provided to "at risk" populations and underserviced groups such as the Hispanic communrty and high
school students CWSS' Education Specialist provides outreach through education, training and promotion of community
awareness, county-wide.
15. Do you assist clients to get to your program site or provide services out in the
community? -
CWSS uses a transportation vouCher system and maintains a contract wrth a local taxi company which has agreed to pick up
clients, wherever they may be, and bring them to the shetter Police and Sheriffs WIll also escort victms to CWSS.
16. For this specific program for which CDBG is requested, estimate the total
number of:
a. Total clients served or estimated to be served in:
SAFEHOUSE:
HOTLINE
1993-94
1992-93
1991-92
(,(16
438
2900
2600
2031
455
b. Chula Vista residents served or estimated to be served in:
SAFEHOUSE
1993-94
1992-93
1991-92
45
36
11
HOTLINE
60
55
50
c. Low-income clients served or estimated to be served in:
(low-income household is defined as follows: 1 person =$23, 150; 2person =$26,450;
3person=$29,750; 4person=$33,050)
1993-94 1289
1992-93 1178
1991-92 947
17. What methods will you use to account for the income level and other
demographic information on your clients?
I ntake information formally recorded for all Safehouse clients
Hotline callers are asked for income level and address
SANDAG statistics and projections
Pollee Department Statistics
The United Way
South Bay Human Services Directory Information
C~y of Chula VISta Human Services Needs Assessment
.
PLEASE ATTACH THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
a) A PROGRAM BROCHURE OR FLYER (if you have one)
b) A CURRENT LIST OF YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS (one page)
c) A COMPLETE LIST OF CURRENT SOURCES OF REVENUE (one page)
CENTER FOR WOMEN'S STUDIES AND SERVICES
BACKGROUND INFORMATION: The Center for Women's Studies and Services (CWSS) is a
5(11(C)3 nonprofit orqa~ization established in 19(,~ to imprcw(" the 1('ga1, 80::-ial, po1i
tiedl, CCOnCgnlC and C'uln.lTal f1tatue of WomC'1l III society. 1n addit)nl1 to dll clllrtY of
edur-ation<tJ and C'ulturdI programs, 1:'I("rvicCf:l include:
THB RAPB CRISIS CBNTBR (Rce) maintains a 24-hour emergency Hotline to assist women
who are victims of rape, domestic violence or crieis resulting from Borne other element of
their lives. Thie program includes counseling, hospital accompaniment, referral to our
Legal Clinic and/or Project Safehouse (PSH). and serves as a major source of referral to
other organizations and services which may be needed. Staffed primarily by carefully
trained volunteers, the Hotline deals with approximately 3500 calls per year.
THB LBGAL CLINIC is a three-fold program:
1) The Temnorarv Restrainina Order Clinic ITROl provides women with assistance in
obtaining a legal restraining order intended to limit, or in some cases prohibit access to
a woman or her children providing information about legal actions which are available,
direct assistance in completing the request forms and, frequently, personal accompaniment
to the court for the actual hearing. To date, 1,698 wo~en have been helped with TRO's.
2) The Dissolution Clinic; In 1989 CWSS started a divorce clinic for battered
women. For many family violence victims divorce costs and complicated court procedures
prevent them from undertaking this last, vital step of separating themselves and their
children from a violent husband. Initially available only to CWSS clients, the demand for
inexpensive divorce services for battered women was BO overwhelming that the clinic now
makes services available to every low. income battered woman seeking assistance. Since
1988 we have seen 603 women in our Dissolution Clinic, and 213 of them have completed
divorce pro~eedings.
3) Court Acco~animent is important for those clients who are unfamiliar with or
frightened by the court system. To date, 371 women have been accompanied to court.
Bilingual staff are available to Spanish speaking clients who may not understand the
directions or requests of the court.
PROJECT SAFBHOUSB (PSH) is an emergency refuge for women and their children who, as
victims of domestic violence, require immediate relocation in a safe, protected environ-
ment. Clients can usually be admitted to PSH within a day; if there is no room, clients
may be housed in a motel for a night or two. PSH normally has between ten and fifteen
clients in residence at any given time, and the normal length of stay is seven to ten
days. Since 1988 PSH has been a refuge for 841 women and 1,682 children (2523 total).
A major advantage of CWSS is that we are able to offer assietance on a one.to-onf:" bacifJ,
and has programs broad enough to allow the majority of our clients' needs to be met on an
immediate, in-house basis. When outside referrals are required CWSS' cooperative network
with other attorneys and/or organizations (private and public) a continuity of service
that is vital to their personal survival.
Of primary concern to CWSS are the issues of education and prevention. Community outreach
and awareness are essential if the reasons for and prevention of domestic violence and
abuse are to be effectively addressed. To this end, CWSS has a public speaking program and
a variety of classes and counseling programs are offered at schools. colleges, univer-
sities and the workplace, ae well ae at CWSS facilities.
ewss Services are either free or on a eliding-fee ecale basis.
cwss. December, 1992
I!!!~:
I_:ii~
CENTER FOR WOMENS STUDIES AND SERVICES. 2467 'E' ST SAN DIEGO, CA 92102 (6191 233-8984
BOARD QE DIRECfORS
1. Christine Accomando
Graduate Student/Instructor
6. Dr. Joyce Nower
President
Instructor. SDSU
Bonita. CA 91902
La Mesa, CA 91941
2. Jean Campbell. Ph.D.
Psycholo ist
La Jolla, CA 92037
7. Teresa Odendahl
Anthropologist, Consultant,
Teacher, Writer
3. Elizabeth A. Cobbs. Ph.D.
Vice President
Associate Professor. USD 8.
La Mesa. CA 92041
4. SheIia Kirk
~
San Diego, CA 92102
9. Martha O. Williams
T er
'San Diego. CA 92101
5, Joyce Lane
~
~9194I
I!!W1
,:ii:ii!
CENTER FOR WOMEN'S STUDIES AND SERVICES. 2467 'E' ST. SAN DIEGO, CA 92102 1619J 233-8984
CWSS ACTUAL BUDGET
JULY I, 1990. JUNE SO, 1991
I. INCOME
SOURCE
City of San Diego
OCJP - Project Reach Out
OCJP - Project Reach Out
Matching Funds - In-Kind.
OCJP - Rape Crtsls Center
OCJP - Rape Crtsls Center - Matching Funds - In-KIn
OCJP - Federal Rape Prevention & Education
($19.051 durtng 1991)...
Unlted Way of San Diego - TRO Clinic
Unlted Way of San Diego
Crisis Counseling & Case Management
Unlted Way of San Diego - Project Safehouse
Unlted Way of San Diego
Project Safehouse - Matching Funds
OCJP - ESP
Work Study
Interest Revenue
Memberships
Service Fees
Individual Donations
TOTAL INCOME
AMOUNT
$77.530,70
$49,946,67
($17,500,00)
$65.065,06
($6.250,00)
$40,547,27
$15,450,00
$41,349,96
$90,675.00
$5,292.66
$9,215,00
$1,434,61
$2.221.81
$506,00
$10,350,86
$71 441.48
.
$481.027.081
. Project Reach Out Matching Funds were matched by Personnel.
. . Rape Crisis Center Matching Funds were matched by Personnel.
. . . Federal Rape: The Total Grant award is $61,859. Contract runs from 01/901/91
to 06/30/92 therefore amount shown reflects actual contract amount less
expenditures for the first six months,
!!ni
~~l
:ENTER FOR WOMEN S STUDIES AND SERVICES' 2467 'E' ST SAN DIEGO. CA 92102 16191 233-8984
OPERATING BUDGET
FISCAL YEAR 1991 - 1992
JULY 1, 1991 - JUNE 30, 1992
I. INCOME
City of San Diego
.. Office of Criminal Justice Planning
(Project Reach Out)
... Office of Criminal Justice Planning
(Rape Crisis Center)
· Office of Crtminal Justice Planning
(Federal Rape Prevention & Education)
United Way of San Diego
(Crisis Counseling & Case Management)
United Way of San Diego
(TRO Clinic)
United Way of San Diego
(Project Safehouse)
United Way - Project Safehouse
Matching Funds
Ind1v1dual Donations
Memberships
Service Fees
TOTAL INCOME
AMOUNT
$ 80,545
50,000
70,4 77
42,808
45,500
17.000
100,800
8,000
12.500
. 1.200
7,800
$ 436,130
This Is an eighteen month contract wlUch runs from 01/01/91 to 6/30/92,
therefore Income shown Is for the fiscal year 07/01/91 to 06/30/92. Total
contract amount Is $61.859.
65% match requirement by OCJP Project Reach Out Contract Is being
matched with services valued at $27,500.
.
..
-
OCJP Rape Crtsls Center Contract Is betng matched by In-klnd Services
valued at $5.818.
JAN 1993
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
FUNDING APPLICATION FOR 1993-94
NOTE: THIS APPLICATION IS DUE NO LATER THAN MARCH 1, 1993 AT 5
P.M. AT THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT, 276 FOURTH AVE., CHULA VISTA.
Program/Project Name: j)70:.,I& C;./ ii'"" - ~'r,dL'I W/lrl;, u'{,f'/m"Z /0U7
Name of Organization: 7/k C/lub? tltJ4? CoAJ,.Jfchri
Contact Person: Et~/itJc/rI -5;;/11/.,.,01 Title fJ/?liS/c/t!/.,/1
Address:
W1//
Telephone
(/II. hl!?";I ,1
1. Amount of Funding Requested:
$ ) 4 iJ7J'rr
$ ~.=/&{h1'JlJ
1
2. Amount of 1992-93 CDBG Funding:
3. If this is an existing program, how many
years has it served Chula Vista residents?
~ears
Viis
/
4. Is this program physically located in Chula Vista?
5. Describe the main goal(s), objectives, and activities of your organization:
/ilL rill.;.! ftJ/16 tp/ our- tJ"}f/?#'/2ftJ;c,,J 's .1}:
l1/d~ the ""-f::if /?"-'d -Lodlb! ;,.,.'Co,;",,! M~LEJ. /fS5;J; /,)
dh"m.eE my 11'1 stf1jJO~;;1 JMI;/.< (l1c;i.'l/;i"J iJlOIcI
?c C.&y;;;",,.J# t. J. /~{//// /9~/U'ElOIes.s IJlOIcI f/J,.Jf .-o.e'eve,.J//oj
Ilff> .%~flf.JJ I .RL/N~c;.ea //Jmf /?#'d /v'E~#dM:.Aotd
i/N'7
6. Describe the specific program for which funds are requested: (If you are only
requesting funds for general organizational support, go to question # 10).
Ilt tli,s tlr1~ ,f-;j,,/d~ t?Ef(/tlJ/i:J tLldL ,M d">L-~d h;,e
the C/Md 07/,( Ct;./;;:~ //!o//d'?130(/~?~ SE..!v/CO ;:-~,t!
Lot-U /NCoijE: F"rld/t/E"S //,,1 /1 ./C/1.>oL 5~;rh.'J'
7. Why is this program needed in Chula Vista?:
L'?/J /J'OY"'l1I'f iJ !iJddEd /,.} ~ ~yy;' )/Ol(/J-t'
-t/Jag /}4! lJ~t 0/ /fld) //.JCiJdL! MI"/,uh &0'0 C'/?N.vtJ/
i1;:h/C.'cI ~7'C1~ o/! -1"7 "ij/,( or ,l't?rl!,t! .5r/j'E"./!/J/oJ
hI: tt7hi2 d,~.c,./, did//' LPaIE,i! c:as,! Ct7,1d 071<'.(. /PK
sc/c.// h}~b"/S kss c.AU,,(c,) apt!' LiE If?/ i1!u/lM
/Ie '?tJdCc'.
8. Who will be providing the services? Briefly describe qualifications of key
staff and indicate their level of education/training:
Ild. .51/1;:;: ,~v:/dtl8:{ .:;.;vCtl/~'1 4/SEI;; .61i'1E" /I hi!?
:5chvoL Edt.tCAh.'-! /J";d' II! /.f/?.:./ ~fJ, If'? C'0/1'7'~-' /:6&~--I1'~i!
j}/1/? A/tiE: /Je iU,ji /~ ",AI,.;.} ,-,,; ckd petlE;J//1'6v / /1,./01
(jl.!c" fb ~1/"'~lbI~.5 (Jr !".&?c0~7",.1c; E//8'1E:CC: /'?e hy _(/I,{'6"
Cb.J~L P,;?I!&(/k'J /?.ld Iblc0u. wdt gee.. /~t/id/ .s~.6/cE:..f
ro"'- 7/J/~ //27'&/"1. .
9. Program Budget: Total: $ StJ,tJ?;o p€,f! I/o";;;'!' ( 7'rlUI/fE-drj'C;/.t'.so /70,,"''-EJ)
(Include only those expenses directly related to tlie program for which funding is
requested).
CDBG
Salaries/Benefits:
$
$
OTHER FUNDS
., .J 75L"'tJ
I
Rent/Utilities:
J;l.tJ"ZJD
/
6 cmv
/
Equipment/Supplies:
S6~
Other rOt? cf
~/ ""'" 00
;l.'[..</'
Other
~,..t&,o/!/IJ;;o,J
})H.>' :eE r
schol!lL 5'f'ft7e.5
., .57JZi. 00
.J 6" <Xi. IX>
Other
Subtotals:
$
I;?ti avo
/
$
'1'6 Ii,,?.' bO
,
10. Specify exactly how the CDBG funds will be used:
/if t;;,s ii.rfe! f/;e. or-,/J,vr h/,vQi i/hl! /J~ t/xd
h-e file /rh(;iIL ie/I.5E .I1,f~E//e,,-'~ ~eES. r--,e.. ~/bF
tJr ,j. riM/I?!> ;V~ /I 1>)40511 11;0(/,,/1/7 '7 _IJ .1/ ~~_~l'Zi <'D.
Tk, /?~,~A.lI'711 6/tW!.tv iL),C? LIe t/Sed reM! o.I,,,;'p,C//- .
ch/l;JfE5 sue /)5, L"aI ;::1</.>/1 Jdje/> / t:""t/'JI:- Co)li.5c/v/1/;c,"/
Avo' Icir'oc/ti/l f,; I) .5C/h'j. E/'l//,'!C/'/<'ft'A/I.
11. Please list the name and amount of other secured or potential sources of
funding for this specific program:
I). ul'lv;d LJRI'lc,f - Fd"dR"/sE~ -
.:$l. G/I,Mf"- shih - Sd/';Vt IIbT'.5
cto"J""led
r/1r/~
'5: tJ!Ju.''''
..
/ ",~.~a
12. Do you anticipate needing CDBG funding for this program in subsequent
years? Yes.:1' No
If yes, how much funding will be needed each year?
1994-95 $ /6 tWJ 1995-96 $ ,(),t1?JlJ 1996-97 $ /tJ,dlRf'
~ , ,
13. Who will be served by your program and what are the boundaries of your
service area? (Jt(e ,'1'/1/"/ o~.iFd;~'E /.5 10 ,-7e{o (Ile j1co/t'E /,./
-the Old/11 0.5/1? C'Ol'ldt/(;j'- IIotiJ~ve,i! s/..,jc~ 1i..5 /;2t7~M.rf Md
b~ lJet/Jl1. C;;,(cI/?bI /II:. / tLle UJ///. five oi(~ 09h /l.J..i,'JM",/CE
70 ()tAeL St/,e',i'Ot/"Jd7 AU/?.5 st/C/! /1J /l.l'4/'ONI11 C7
/lAta' Sot//;! ..5/1"/ 1>/;/",.
14. How do people find out about your program? How do you do outreach?
;:>ecylc CI./id hiv'd tJet! /l.1tU;- dt/;(! .Mc/~lj _ ~
Nt:(.<ISj'd/.E.e I1ds AAld' r,-5,'<'<Jt//1f rf/?,t"1 ,# h.en'd//o~
Otl/ iiJ r.4e. CO/fr!U/.J/j
15. Do you assist clients to get to your program site or provide services out in the
community? YES, t1/& a'/IL k //d~ t.p _ cAc/l'?EJ ~o:!..
3chds /1"'/c! eJ.e r,;Je/e /,1.....,...~J /;:' /,4,eI.-~"//J ,1';?vE. AId /,Mds-
/ol<'iIi Ii...J
16. For this specific program for which CDBG is requested, estimate the total
number of:
a. Total clients served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94 -<50 ~E'LfOd.s
1992-93_.z7t7 ',o/:;!JOA/S
1991-92 /C() .J;/...!Jorl5
,
b. Chula Vista residents served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94 ~N) ,o,l--RS.:JA.'5
1992-93~cJO_. /Jh"~&I>
1991-92-.5?' /-J/boAlJ
I
c. Low-income clients served or estimated to be served in:
(low-income household is defined as follows: 1person=$23,150; 2person=$26,450;
3person=$29,750; 4person=$33,050)
1993-94--.15"0 1'8...so,.)5
1992-93J5t-' drLfo...!f
1991-92 Icm ~/.t'.SoJs
I
17. What methods will you use to account for the income level and other
demographic information on your clients?
70 dl'/!fou'E .50rlEONE- I/V ";Etf,i1 Mr! d.5J,J,;;!";CE
Or Lottie..! ('Of>I- chllclC/l~ UlL!. tL-'t:7c///. ~'ff4'b/ /!:.,t'OC// 0/
X";CME, Ci/E';Y d> do//J?/J 10_ 'l'~ l-iv '/E~;;;C/?/'O~ tdct///
JINE 70 bE Rf ?;Oi'tl<l~d I' () sm&d -t/;e-LAld,"o'/oi-.4/s IJl'lilE
Ii/of Ob/;I,,,Ic<:!/1 j()~ c/7/l,Jfe J"oLSs /Ie- hItEi!;il7 iYtZ
fllitlid' /I /J?C///c;/;tJ// /I,Jd tJtC /'7 MI.JC tYl.:/.>/,,;/ /E4?so/.lJ ,,.,1<7/
/0 ~e: CO/.lJI/e~/ ,low ;:"'Cv/l[ /Vd/lc"c /tv'hA?//-;i:"J HJdt
~lf {}/;t'-/l'tVEcI ~ (/lit",; j"J;e. i4&/lc sdt/J?CL.
PLEASE ATTACH THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
a) A PROGRAM BROCHURE OR FLYER (if you have one)
b) A CURRENT LIST OF YOUR BOARD OF DffiECTORS (one page)
c) A COMPLETE LIST OF CURRENT SOURCES OF REVENUE (one page)
~$/~ -5/ /;1/3
C/ -'
../J
w?5c$ c/ #P? /'cfZ"Q:/~;
J -,~/;0.{(:/1:Cd.~) d~ A&~' g /~:#
.77'. ::;::.</_- <k/cf'~~~~--%: - r'7<:"t2/h' -~--.
//6d;' c:/ P',C'lff,y-, ad/''' d:Vh;'%/ <Z6V
/
4-''';<>' ~,a/
:7, ~/ / {2
./7//. f ;</
t
c!7/ ~"'>>#fr
.kd~"'.
k; '" z/5/ ~;;~:;b :::;t/::~L
~. C2,'v ~#'z:;/ ,,%~- ~/;/.&' cir ~O'/?/ ",,~,-?C,'
dMc;-t':/ d ~. u.> ./7/;; /c#d ~.a7 :"-q /l7'Z?,('fi-b'
/ /
//,/;'{-fX7d /P,<C?%D' y/ fi/~O:' ~ //&<:;>( ~ t?d/./
. . tI.
-<?t?</#/ ~&'~ t:f 06-:V /7//#~:f!'r, ,(/,;' c/~;Z//d tYZ://..'
Z't;l7/ ~?/ ~:Jf;/d'di-",'/ .db) . d~ .#//a:.
/i:~' ~/.W./,/ /.J,~O V'Mv ,.-;;;;p.&// .L7~'t:X ~ /A~/f'//p:/
/ . /..~./ t-
/5Yr/ ,0;. cWr 4//$ t,/-cl-%''-d' ~/.cv' /##ff.
;/
~?ff~ .
/11,zdc7'&.dvi:'4C........-
/
.
OFFICERS
ELIZABETH STILLWAGON
PRESIDENT
-2~l~~--
~~#
t~/Ud~2%tZd~,/
T-- ;tJ-;;J1--f/-
PEGGY PRICE
VICE-PRESIDENT/ DIRECTOR
KATHY BARNETTE
SECRETARY/ TREASURER
MAR 19:13
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
FUNDING APPLICA nON FOR 1993-94
f0;'i" :, I..'~!
i""'; "-.t
NOTE: THIS APPLICATION IS DUE NO LATER THAN MARCH 1, 1993 AT 5
P.M. AT THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT, 276 FOURTH AVE., CHULA VISTA.
Program/Project Name: Police Activities Leaque (P.A.L.)
Name of Organization:
Chula Vista Police Department
Contact Person:
F. M. Becker
Title
Sergeant
Address:
Telephone
I. Amount of Funding Requested:
$ S.OOO
2. Amount of 1992-93 CDBG Funding:
$ 0
3. If this is an existing program, how many
years has it served Chula Vista residents?
o years
4. Is this program physically located in Chula Vista?
yes
5. Describe the main goal(s), objectives, and activities of your organization:
The goal of the Chula Vista Police Activities League will
be to bring "cops and kids" together in an effort to educate
and direct the energy of the youth of the community in a
positive manner. The direction will be provided by police
department volunteers and citizen volunteers who want to
become part of the organization. The volunteers will be
committed to working with the youth of community in pro-
viding guidance and feedback, as well as crisis intervention
when necessary in helping them to make decisions in life.
The volunteers will be committed in assisting these children
in after school activities, both athletic and social at the
various school sites and community buildings throughout the
city. The organization is open to all youths from the fifth
grade level through high school.
The program would also like to expand in future years in assist-
ing those at risk youth from the age of 18-22 in various activi-
ties that would assist them in becoming involved as future
volunteers for the program.
At the present time, we are featuring our first activity,
which is working with the Chula Vista Parks and Recreation
League in providing our volunteers as coaches and referees
for the city's Playground Basketball Program. The volunteers
MAIN GOAL(S), OBJECTIVES, AND ACTIVITIES (cont'd) ...
are working as coaches and providing guidance with the kids,
as well as value building during the practice sessions and
games held on the elementary playgrounds. By doing this, it
allows the officers to take off their uniform, their symbol
of authority, and work one on one with these at risk youth in
helping to guide them in the right direction to make the proper
decisions in life. We target these at risk youth because they
are the leaders of tomorrow. They are confronted on a daily
basis with the tough decisions in life (that being drugs, gangs,
and street violence). We feel that becoming involved with these
kids at a young age will reap rewards to the community and to
ourselves by allowing them to see police officers as real people.
We know that as we interact with these kids, as they go through
life, they will remember that when they were younger police
officers were someone who helped them through the tough times
in their lives. We realize that a majority of our efforts will
be concentrated in the minority and low income communities, as
it has been shown that this type of program is most effective
in those areas and those individuals are the ones who are in need
of such a program.
We are applying for the CDBG funds due to the fact we have abso-
lutely no funding for this program at this time other than through
private donations. We do not feel that the telemarketing approach
which is being utilized by other organizations of this kind through-
out the state is the proper method of which to solicit funding.
We feel there are other organizations within the community, such as
YMCA and Boys and Girls Clubs that provide for the youth of the
community. We merely want to work in support with those organi-
zations to assist them in providing our volunteers to them in a
cooperative coalition.
6. Describe the specific program for which funds are requested: (If you are only
requesting funds for general organizational support, go to question # 10).
7. Why is this program needed in Chula Vista?:
8. Who will be providing the services? Briefly describe qualifications of key
staff and indicate their level of education/training:
., . l~ ..
9. Program Budget: Total: $
(Include only those expenses directly related to the program for which funding is
requested).
CDBG
OTHER FUNDS
Salaries/Benefits:
$
$
Rent/Utilities:
Equipment/Supplies:
Other
Other
Other
Subtotals:
$
$
10. Specify exactly how the CDBG funds will be used:
The funds will be used to provide for programs and funding
for those at risk youths who are in financial need of assis-
tance in applying for the various athletic and activity pro-
grams. There are admission fees that usually run anywhere
from $5 to $20 per child and in contacting these children in
minority and low income communities, we have found in the past
the only reason these children did not participate is because
they did not have the funding or parents could not afford fund-
ing for them either because of unemployment or single parent farnilie
11. Please list the name and amount of other secured or potential sources of etc.
funding for this specific program:
Private donations from various community and business
leaders. The amounts of which are unknown at this time.
12. Do you anticipate needing CDBG funding for this program in subsequent
years? Yes xxx No
If yes, how much funding will be needed each year?
1994-95 $ 10,000 1995-96 $ 7,500 1996-97 $ 5,000
13. Who will be served by your program and what are the boundaries of your
service area?
This program will be open to all youth within the community
and the city limits of the City of Chula Vista from the
ages of 8 years through 22 years who wish to participate
in the program.
14. How do people find out about your program? How do you do outreach?
The program itself is being promoted through various orga-
nizations within the community. Our P.A.L. Board of Directors
represents a wide culturally diverse group. The print media
has also been utilized, as well as the elementary school
district, as well as the Sweetwater Union High School District
to pass the word at their monthly meetings throughout the
community.
15. Do you assist clients to get to your program site or provide services out in the
community?
We currently have no transportation to transport these
youth at risk to the various sites: however, we are currently
looking at coordinating with the YMCA in the use of their vans
to assist us in transporting some of these youth at risk to
the various locations when they do not have transportation.
10. Specify exactly how the CDBG funds will be used (cont'd) ...
Other expenses will be for printing of fliers and applica-
tions for the program, as well as general funding needs for
the making of logos or printing of t-shirts for the partici-
pants to utilize for the various athletic events.
16. For this specific program for which CnBG is requested, estimate the total
number of:
a. Total clients served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94
1992-93
1991-92
300
1<;0
o
b. Chula Vista residents served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94 300
1992-93 , 'i0
1991-92 0
c. Low-income clients served or estimated to be served in:
(low-income household is defined as follows: lperson=$23,150; 2person=$26,450;
3person=$29,750; 4person=$33,050)
1993-94
1992-93
1991-92
150
7'i
o
17. What methods wiD you use to account for the income level and other
demographic information on your clients?
Upon joining the Police Activities League, we are going to
have the applicants or their parents complete an application
which will indicate their address and information where they
live within the City of Chu1~,Vista, what school they attend,
what programs they are interested in. At the present time,
we do not require any income disclosure; however, if necessary,
we can add that to the application.
PLEASE ATTACH THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
a) A PROGRAM BROCHURE OR FLYER (if you have one)
b) A CURRENT LIST OF YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS (one page)
c) A COMPLETE LIST OF CURRENT SOURCES OF REVENUE (one page)
POLICE ACTIVITIES LEAGUE
Board of Directors
Honorable Jess Rodriguez
Superior Court
500 Third Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Honorable Luis Vargas
South Bay Court, Dept. 7
500 Third Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Honorable Tim Nader
Mayor of the City of C.V.
Chula Vista Civic Center
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Bob Sutherland
Bonita, CA 91902
--
Sgt. Mike Becker
Chula Vista Police Department
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Lita David
Chula Vista, CA 91911
Jess Valenzuela
Parks and Recreation Department
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Arlie Ricasa
Jim Cartmill
13
Pam Smith
Social Security Office
380 Third Avenue, Suite B
~a, CA 91910
Mr. Patrick O'Brien
San Diego, CA 92164
Loren Tarantino
Chula Vista, CA 91911
Pat Cavanaugh
Chula Vista Star News
835 Third Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Kathy Lembo
South Bay Community Services
315 Fourth Avenue, Suite E
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Jay Crawford
N.I.F.C.U.
503 Telegraph Canyon Road
Chula Vista, CA 91911
Greg Cox
547 Windsor Circle
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Shirley Horton, Councilwoman
Chula Vista Civic Center
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Michael A. Green
535 H Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Yolanda Jimenez
256 Zenith
Chu1a Vista, CA 91911
Chula Vista, CA 91911-5837
Agent Gary Wedge
CVPD Explorer Program
276 Fourth Avenue
ChuIa Vista, CA 91910
POLICE ACTIVITIES LEAGUE
Board of Directors
W. Scott Mosher
Boys and Girls Club of C.V.
1301 Oleander
Chula Vista, CA 91911
. ~;
-/
...
A
";-1,<
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COiY1MllNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
FUNDING APPLICATION FOR 1993-94
MAR 1993
Resehred
Comm{!.1ify L'ecT1apmr.nt
Df;Pilrf::rrer;/
NOTE: THIS APPLIC4.TION IS DUE NO LATER THAN MARCH 1, 1993 AT 5
P.M. AT THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT, 276 FOURTH AVE., CHULA. VISTA.
Program/Project Name: Chula Vista Intervention Team
Name of Organization: Chula Vista Police Department
Contact Person: Sergeant d' Ab1aing
TitleSergeant of Crimes of Violence
Address: 276 4th Ave.
Chula Vista. CA 91910
Telephone
--
1. Amount of Funding Requested:
S 25,000
2. Amount of 1992-93 CDBG Funding:
S 15,000
3. If this is an existing program, how many
years has it served Chula Vista residents?
one years
4. Is this program physically located in Chula Vista?
yes
5. Describe the main goal(s), objectives, atili activities of your organization:
N/A
, '
, .
6. Describe the specific program for which funds are requested: (If you are onl"
requesting funds for general organizational support, go to question it 10).
See attachment A
7. Why is this program needed in Chula Vista?:
See attachment B
8. Who will be providing the services? Briefly describe qualifications of key
staff and indicate their level of education/training:
See attachment C
9. 'Program Budget: Total: $ 34,120
(Include only those expenses directly related to the program for which funding is
requested).
Salaries/Benefits:
CDBG
$ 25,000
$ 7,000
OTHER FUNDS
RentJUtilities:
EquipmentJSupplies:
600
Other training
500
Other mileaqe
420
Other telephone
600
Subtotals:
$ 25,000
$ 9,120
- .
] O. Specify exactly how the CDBG funds will be used:
Total will be applied to the salary
for the F.T. Intervention Specialist.
11. Please list the name and amount of other secured or potential sources of
funding for this specific program:
South Bay Community Services will raise the additional
funds in salary/benefits, mileage and training through
private foundationhs. SBCS & CVPD will absorb the telephone
and office supply costs.
12. Do you anticipate needing CDBG funding for this program in subsequent
years? Yes X No
If yes, how much funding will be needed each year?
1994-95 $25,000 1995-96 $25,000 1996-97 $ 25,000
13. Who will be served by your program and what are the boundaries of your
service area?
Victims and other family members and perpetrators
of domestic vilence within the city of Chula vista.
14. How do people find out about your program? How do you do outreach?
Referrals from Police reports - also groups will be
announced on radio and through local newspaper.
15. Do you assist clients to get to your program site or provide services out in the
community?
The intervention specialist can and. does provide transportation
if necessary. Home visits are also conducted if appropriate.
( .
16_ For this specific program for which CDBe is r-equcsted. estimate the total
number of:
a_ Total clients served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94 320
1992-93 300
1991-92 150
b. Chula Vista residents served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94 320
1992-93 300
1991-92 150
c. Low-income clients served or estimated to be served in:
(low-income household is defined as follows: 1 person =$23, 150; 2person =526,450;
3person=$29,750; 4person=$33,050)
1993-94 300
1992-93 250
1991-92 100
17. What methods will you use to account for the income level and other
demographic information on your clients?
Self disclosure and police reports
PLEASE ATTACH THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
a) A PROGRAM BROCHURE OR FLYER (if you have one)
b) A CURRENT LIST OF YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS (one page)
c) A COMPLETE LIST OF CURRENT SOURCES OF REVENUE (one page)
. .
ATTACHMENT A
6. SPECIFIC PROGRAM FOR WHICH FUNDS ARE REQUESTED
The Chula vista Intervention Team is a coalition between, the Chula
vista Police Department (CVPD), South Bay Community Services, and
other providers of domestic violence services.
The Chula Vista Intervention Team (CVIT), serves victims and
perpetrators of domestic violence within the Chula vista community.
CVIT provides crisis intervention, and referral services to 300
victims and perpetrators soon after the violence occurs in an
effort to terminate the abusive behavior and initiate a healthy
relationship within the home.
Through the use of an Intervention Specialist, supplied by SBes and
housed in the CVPD, victims of domestic violence and the alleged
perpetrators will be contacted immediately and provided crisis
intervention, a treatment plan developed, and assistance in seeking
services that will help them with their problem. A written
assessment of the situation will also be developed, followed by
referrals to a suitable treatment program. All family members,
including children will be included in the assessment. Once in
treatment, clients will be monitored and follow up contacts made.
Immediately after a police report is filed, it will be directed to
the Intervention Specialist working in house at the CVPD. The
primary role of the Intervention Specialist will be to contact
victims and perpetrators of domestic violence soon after receiving
the police report documenting the incident. The target population
being incidents where no arrest occurs and/or in misdemeanor cases,
although felony cases will be also handled where appropriate. The
ultimate goal of the Intervention Specialist will be to provide
immediate crisis intervention services, develop a treatment plan,
and ensure the provision of services that will assist victims and
batterers with their problems.
ATTACHMENT B
7. Chula vista has a 45% higher rate of domestic violence
incidence per capita than that of San Diego, CA. In 1986, 1,214
domestic violence cases were reported in Chula vista. In 1987, the
number of reported cases rose to 1,222. Approximately 70% of the
victims in those cases declined prosecution at the scene of the
crime. In 1987, there were 1,484 victims of domestic violence, and
of these 217 (or 15%) were the victim in more than one incident.
Effective 1-1-86, the CVPD began complying with PC Section
13730 requiring the reporting of all incidents of domestic
violence. Police department policy encourages officers to handle
domestic violence with emphasis on taking police action.
This posture has resulted in numerous complains forwarded
through the criminal justice system. However, many instances of
domestic violence are not handled within the criminal justice
system. These particular cases are referred to as
"pre-prosecution" cases because either no arrest occurs, or in
misdemeanor cases the District Attorney cannot prosecute due to the
lack of physical evidence of abuse.
Prior to this program, batterers and victims of domestic
violence in the Chula Vista community who are in the pre-
prosecution category are not being "served. All too often, police
are called to a home by a battered victim or a concerned neighbor,
and can do no more than file a report of the violence. It is
seldom that a victim of domestic violence will press charges
against the batterer, and less often'^that either party will request
help in the form of counseling.
Responding officers handling domestic violence situations
supply the involved parties with written referral information
compiled by SBCS, which includes the locations of emergency
shelters, 24 hour crisis hotlines, and counseling agencies who
provide services both in Spanish and English. In addition,
restraining order protection procedures are provided, and
encouraged in applicable situations. Guns are confiscated for safe
keeping for 48 hours, which is required by statute.
Even though department policies and domestic laws provide a
strong foundation and offer viable immediate assistance to victims,
there is still reluctance on the part of a large majority of
victims to utilize the criminal justice system to resolve their
problems. In most situations the victim will not prosecute and
neither party will pursue help on their own. Presently, there is
no program in Chula vista addressing this issue.
, ,
Very few victims and/or perpetrators of domestic violence in
Chula Vista become actively involved on their own in treatment
until the problem has escalated. without treatment, the
dysfunctional behavior persists and individuals continue to be
victimized.
CVPD created a coalition, recognizing the need for an
intervention strategy that will decrease the number of domestic
violence victims in Chula Vista. The project, entitled "Chula
Vista Intervention Team" (CVIT), has a primary goal of providing
crisis intervention, a treatment plan, and the identification and
assurance of appropriate services to victims and perpetrators of
domestic violence and therefore lower the rate of domestic violence
in Chula Vista.
with the placement of a bilingual (Spanish/English)
Intervention Specialist housed within the CVPD, intervention of
domestic violence can be readily addressed. When a police report
is filed concerning domestic violence, there are no active follow
up services provided to the victim or .the perpetrator. CVIT's
activities are aimed at providing an Intervention Specialist to
assist the victims and perpetrators in obtaining services. The
role of the Intervention Specialist is to act as a catalyst to
resistant individuals in need of treatment as a result of the
domestic violence cycle. The Intervention Specialist will work
one-on-one with the individuals involved in domestic violence, to
develop and monitor an effective treatment plan, for victims and
perpetrators. Clients will be referred to resources and a
relationship will be maintained with the resource for purposes of
follow-up.
:,.,.,
The impact of the program is to prevent escalation and
reoccurrences of domestic violence incidence, and to deal with
underlying problems that lead to domestic violence. The staff will
also address issues of domestic violence for the whole family,
because it affects all family members. Whether or not the couple
stays together, batterers, victims, and children need services.
For instance, children model behavior of their parents; batterers
may move out only to batter someone else. The long term solution
is in preventing the next generation from developing the
dysfunctional behavior of the batterer.
CVIT will benefit victims and batterers ln the Chula vista
community by: a) quickly intervening after an incident occurs and
providing crisis intervention, a treatment plan, and referral to
services for the victim and batterer; b) serving all members of a
family subjected to domestic violence - SECS is also a youth and
family serving agency - for the youth effected by the situation;
and c) interceding and providing services that may help save the
relationship between the victim and the perpetrator by showing the
batterer that a serious problem exists and changes must occur.
ATTACHMENT C
8. STAFF
Services will be provided by a bilingual Intervention Specialist
employed by South Bay Community Services. (see attached resume)
This Specialist is trained in providing individual, group and
family counseling and specifically trained in domestic violence.
SBCS's Clinical Director, MFCC, Ph D. (see resume) will provide
weekly case consultation. SBCS's Associate Director the former
CVPD Police Chief will supervise the staff, CVPD's Sgt. of the
Crimes of Violence Division will coordinate and consult with the
Intervention Specialist.
HAK 1~9:J
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK. GRANT
FUNDING APPLICA nON FOR 1993-94
Rfl"":~.-l
COiiq,',<y"
r:,-" "'_;':
NOTE: THIS APPLICATION IS DUE NO LATER THAN MARCH 1, 1993 AT 5
P.M. AT THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT, 276 FOURTH AVE., CHULA VISTA.
Program/Project Name:
Chula Vista Literacy Team
Name of Organization: Chula vista
David J. Palmer
Contact Person: Meq Schofield
Public Library
Acting Library
Title Coordinator
Director
Address:~
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Telephone____
I. Amount of Funding Requested:
$43,190
2. Amount of 1992-93 CDBG Funding:
$43.190
3. If this is an existing program, how many
years has it served Chula Vista residents?
6 years
4. Is this program physically located in Chula Vista? yes
5. Describe the main goal(s), objectives, and.activities of your organization:
The Chula Vista Literacy Team is a program of the Chula Vista Public
Library in partnership with the Chula Vista Adult School and the Altrusa
Club of Chula Vista. This coalition was founded in 1987 with the goal of
reducing illiteracy in our community. It is the only local agency that
trains volunteer tutors to provide one-an-one instruction to English-
speaking, functionally illiterate adults. By decreasing illiteracy, its
related costs such as employee inefficiency and accidents, social and
family dysfunction, and dependence on public assistance are also reduced.
By redressing the lack of basic reading, writing, computation, and "life"-
skills of hundreds of adults, the Chula Vista Literacy Team provides them
with the tools they need to realize their potential, and to become more
productive members of the community.
The Chula Vista Literacy Team recruits community volunteers and provides
them with an intensive IS-hour tutor training course, instructional
materials, tutoring sites, as well as on-going in-services, and personal
advising and support.
Adult learners are extensively interviewed and their skill levels and
academic needs are assessed. They are matched with tutors for an individ-
ualized instructional program geared specifically to meet their needs.
Learner progress is monitored both on a monthly and a semi-annual basis.
In addition, we receive special grant awards to offer family literacy
services and small group writing classes to our adult learners.
6. Describe the specific program for which funds are requested: (If you are only
requesting funds for general organizational support, go to question # 10).
Please see #5 above.
7. Why is this program needed in Chula Vista?: National statistics state that one
in five adults in the U.S. is functionally illiterate. In Chula Vista it is
estimated that over 12,000 English-speaking adults can not read, write, or
perform basic computations well enough to function effectively at home or on
the job. (70% of today's jobs require a 9th grade reading level.) The
specific needs of these people are not met by ESL (English as a Second Language
or GED (high school equivalency) courses. Chula Vista Literacy Team is the
only local program offering instruction in a highly individualized, flexible
format to those people reading & writing below the 8th grade level.
8. Who will be providing the services? Briefly describe qualifications of key
staff and indicate their level of education/training:
The Coordinator of the program holds a Masters degree in Education as does
~he professional Tutor Trainer. The Administrative Assistant holds a
,achelor's degree.
Volunteer staff are trained by the Coordinator to conduct interviews with
new learners and to assist with clerical duties. Volunteer tutors undergo
an intensive IS-hour training course and receive day-to-day support from
the Coordinator and staff.
9. Program Budget: Tolal:$ 105,760
(Include only those expenses directly related to the program for which funding is
requested).
CDBG OTHER FUNDS
Salaries/Benefits: $ 34,380 $ 42,970
Rent/Utilities: 15,780
Equipment/Supplies: 1,500
(inc!. Instruct'l Resources)
Other printinq 830
Other Professional 4,020 3,820
Serv~ces:
Other Communications: 1,980
Transp. Allowance: 480
Subtolals: $ $
43,190 62,570
10. Specify exactly how the CDBG funds will be used:
CDBG funds will be used to cover the operational costs of
running the Chula Vista Literacy Team (minus rent and utilities)
and a portion (.88l of the Literacy Team Coordinator's salary.
11. Please list the name and amount of other secured or potential sources of
funding for this specific program:
Please see attached page.
12. Do you anticipate needing CDBG funding for this program in subsequent
years? Yes X No
If yes, how much funding will be needed each year?
1994-95$ 43,190 1995-96$ 1996-97$
13. Who will be served by your program and what are the boundaries of your
service area?
English-speaking adults 18 years of age or older who reside or work
in the South Bay (South of National City), with reading and writing
skills below the 8th grade level are served, without discrimination,
by this program. On occasion, adults with developmental disabilities
and/or severe learning disabilities are referred to other programs
better suited to meet their needs.
14. How do people find out about your program? How do you do outreach?
Please see attached page.
15. Do you assist clients to get to your program site or provide services out in the
community?
We do not provide transportation but attempt to accommodate learners
and tutors by providing tutoring sites throughout the community.
These include The Masonic Lodge, Fredericka Manor, Pilgrim Lutheran
School, Precious Blood Catholic Church, First United Methodist Church,
Rohr Industries, MacMillan Industries, as well as all area
libraries. In addition, a very small percentage 'of tutoring takes
place in private homes if either a learner or tutor is homebound.
11. Please list the name and amount of other secured or potential sources of funding
or this specific program:
Employee Salaries/Benefits
City of Chula Vista General Fund
u.s. Dept. of Education Title VI Grant
CA State ABE Section 321 Grant
$35,823
5,747
1.400
$42,970
(secured)
(secured)
Rent/Utilities
CA State Library CLSA Matching Funds -office
-Annex
$11,580
4,200
$15,780
(secured)
Professional Services
Chula Vista Adult School, tutor trainer salary
$3,820
(in-kind)
TOTAL: $62,570
14. How do people find out about your program? How do you do outreach?
Learners and tutors hear of our program via:
- San Diego Council on Literacy-sponsored Public Service Announcements on
radio and TV
referrals from family and friends through posters and flyers at all branches of
Chula Vista Public Library
referrals from South Bay social service agencies including GAIN, EDD, and
State Department of Rehabilitation
Rohr Industries literacy campaign
local adult schools and community colleges
local media coverage
large sign on front lawn
Our community outreach includes:
- membership in the South Bay Directors Council and the Chula Vista Human
Services Council
- public speaking at wide variety of local service clubs
- sponsorship of literacy-related events at Chula Vista Public Library
- a workforce literacy program at Rohr Industries
- networking and collaboration with Chula Vista Adult School, Chula Vista
Elementary School District, and South Bay Head Start programs
- efforts to obtain media publicity of our program
- publication of quarterly newsletter "Literacy Lines"
16. For this specific program for which CDBG is requested, estimate the total
number of:
a. Total clients served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94 210
1992-93 190
1991-92 178
b. Chula Vista residents served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94 153
1992-93 13 9
1991-92 130
c. Low-income clients served or estimated to be served in:
(low-income household is defined as follows: 1 person =$23, 150; 2person=$26,450;
3person =$29,750; 4person =$33,050)
1993-94 176
1992-93 162
1991-92 151
17. What methods will you use to account for the income level and other
demographic information on your clients?
Demographic information is collected on learners using the
CA State Library CALPEP reporting forms.* This information
is gathered by staff at the time of learner's initial interview.
(*In addition we ask learners to indicate their yearly income
and number of dependents.)
PLEASE ATTACH THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
a) A PROGRAM BROCHURE OR FLYER (if you have one)
b) A CURRENT LIST OF YOUR BOARD OF DffiECTORS (one page)
c) A COMPLETE LIST OF CURRENT SOURCES OF REVENUE (one page)
Board Member/Address
William J. Alexander
Chair
Chula Vista, CA 91913
Chula Vista, CA 91913
Pe
Chula Vista, CA 91910
~iams
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Linda Wilson
Chula Vista, CA 91911
Joanna Lathers
1912
Rosemary Lane,
Libra Director
JoAnn Howard
Library Secretary
Librarv Board Roster
FY 1992-93
Phone
Appointed
7/16/90
7/16/90
7/16/90
.-. 4/12/89
...
6/8/91
12/9/92
Term
Expires
6/30/94*
6/30/94*
6/30/94*
6/30/93*
6/30/95*
*
May be reappointed for one additional four-year term of office.
(Updated February 10, 1993)
Chula Vista Literacy Team
Current Sources of Funding
FY 1992-93
Salaries & Operating Expenses
City of Chula Vista General Fund
after reimbursement of $5,250 by Title VI Grant. (see below)
CDBG
Staff Development
CA State ABE Section 321 Grant
Writing Class
U.S. Dept. of Education Title VI Grant.
(Oct. 1, 1992-June 30, 1993)
Families For Literacy Program
CA State Library Families For Literacy Grant
Annex
ROHR Industries
ROHR (prior year donation carryover)
Altrusa Club of Chula Vista
$32,860
43,190
5,645
22,200
22,000
1,000
2,000
1.200
$130,095
',''('0, CAN BLCC'\':
'1' 'UR!
1/11,;1 pho1le 425-4784)
Or, you can join our team by:
.J Referring employees and clients
.J Providing tutorial sites
.J Offering services or materials
.J Posting ilyers
Contributing funds:
.J $25 will train a tutor
.J $75 will provide textbooks
for a learner for 6 months
.J $~Other gifts will help make
ou r com pu ter lab a rea Ii ty.
'\"lml'__
,-\ifili(ltitm
.\.ddrl'ss
Plwnl'
(I'lease complf'te and mail to the Chula Vista Literacy Team
210 Landis Ave.. Chula Vista. CA Q1QlO.)
,
~~. :.-:
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
FUNDING APPLICATION FOR 1993-94
NOTE: THIS APPLICATION IS DUE NO LATER THAN MARCH 1, 1993 AT 5
P.M. AT THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT, 276 FOURTH AVE., CHULA VISTA.
Program/Project Name:
Citizens Adversity Support Team (C.A.S.T.)
Name of Organization:
Contact Person: Emerald Randolph/KH Title Volunteer Coordinator
Chula Vista Police and Fire Departments/CVHSC
Address:
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Telephone
1. Amount of Funding Requested:
$ 18,650
o
2. Amount of 1992-93 CDBG Fnnding:
$
3. If this is an existing program, how many
years has it served Chnla Vista residents?
o
years
4. Is this program physically located in Chula Vista?
Yes
s. Describe the main goaI(s), objectives, and.activities of your organization:
The program's goal is to provide effective emotional support to
victims of traumatic incidents. This emotional support will be
provided by C.A.S.T. volunteers. C.A.S.T. volunteers will be highly
committed, well trained, compassionate persons who have common
sense. The commitment each volunteer will make is to respond
anywhere in Chula Vista within twenty minutes of being contacted
by the Police Departments Dispatch Center. In order to become a
C.A.S.T. volunteer, a person must pass a thorough background
investigation and complete 33 hours of training covering subjects
from "Emotional First Aid" to "Street Smarts." After providing
initial emotional support and comfort, C.A.S.T. volunteers will
connect victims with appropriate social service providers to
ensure longer term needs are met as effectively as possible.
Finally, by providing these services, C.A.S.T. volunteers will
enable Police and Fire Department personnel to conduct their
business more quickly and more effectively without sacrificing
the very real needs of victims. The C.A.S.T. volunteer is the
missing link between emergency and social service providers.
6. Descl'ibe the specifie program for which funds are requested: (If you are only
requesting funds for general organizational support, go to question # 10).
7. Why is this program needed in Chula Vista?:
8. Who will be providing the services? Briefly describe qualifications of key
staff and indicate their level of education/training:
9. Program Budget: Total: $
(Include only those expenses directly related to the program for which funding is
requested),
CDBG
OTHER FUNDS
Salaries/Benefits:
$
$
Rent/Utilities:
EquipmenUSupplies:
Other
Other
Other
Subtotals:
$
$
10. Specify exactly how the CDBG funds will be used:
The funds will be used to provide for the programs Administrative
Support costs i.e., printing, copying and postage expenses; on-
going training programs for certified C.A.S.T. volunteers; to
conduct an annual appreciation event for volunteer program
supporters, clients and families; and to pay a stipend to the
volunteer coordinator. These expenses will constitute less than
40% of the programs annual budget. The remainder has been funded
by a variety of community sources.
11. Please list the name and amount.of other secured or potential sources of
funding for this specific program:
Vista Hill Hospital & Foundation $6,000 + 360 + 2;000
Chula Vista Police Department Employees
Chula Vista Fire Department Employees
List Trainers
Emerald Randolph
12. Do you anticipate needing CDBG funding for this program in subsequent
years? Yes X No
If yes, how much funding will be needed each year?
1994-95$ 20,000 1995-96$ 17,500 1996-97$ 15,000
13. Who will be served by your program and what are the boundaries of your
service area?
Any citizen involved in a traumatic incident to which a
Chula Vista Police or Fire unit responds. Most will be
persons residing within the City of Chula Vista.
14. How do people find out about your program? How do you do outreach?
1. No outreach is done to victims. They are unknown.
2. Clients are identified by CVFD & CVPD staff in an
effort to ensure they are aware of the C.A.S.T.
program and its benefits.
15. Do you assist clients to get to your program site or provide services out in the
community?
C.A.S.T. will provide services out in the community.
= $8,360
$5,440
$4,320
$3,000
$7,500
16. For this specific program for which CnBG is requested, estimate the total
number of:
a. Total clients served or estimated to be served in:
Police 185
(based on 1992 Crime
1993-94
Stats) 1992-93
1991-92
552
607
698
Fire 367
(based on 1992 Incidents)
b. Chula Vista residents served or estimated to be served in:
.975
1993-94 538
1992-93 592
1991-92 681
c. Low-income clients served or estimated to be served in:
(low-income household is defined as follows: 1 person =$23, 150; 2person =$26,450;
3person =$29,750; 4person =$33,050)
.33
1993-94 182
1992-93 1 q q
1991-92 229
17. What methods will you use to account for the income level and other
demographic information on your clients?
1. C.A.S.T. volunteers will collect demographic data at every
incident. This data will be compiled by the Program
Coordinator. This data will P€ the principal source of
demographic data. .".
2. FOllow-up will be sent to every client.
3. Hartson Medical Services data will be used.
PLEASE ATTACH THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
a) A PROGRAM BROCHURE OR FLYER (if you have one)
b) A CURRENT LIST OF YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS (one page)
c) A COMPLETE LIST OF CURRENT SOURCES OF REVENUE (one page)
Chula Vista Police Department
and
Chula Vista Human Services Council
Citizens Adversity Support Team
Purpose of the CAST Program:
To provide effective emotional and practical support to victims of traumatic incidents and their
families through a community based 24-hour-a-day volunteer effort.
Why the CAST program will work in the Chula Vista Emergency Response System:
.I Timely On Scene Response -- the CAST volunteer wiJI respond anywhere in Chula Vista
within twenty minutes of being notified by Police or Fire Officers on a 24-hour-a-day,
seven-day-a-week basis.
.I Utilized exclusively through the community's emergency response system -- CAST
volunteers are not utilized by, or available through, other entities and focus only on the
needs of people identified through public safety agencies.
.I Broad Brush Approach -- CAST volunteers will respond to any type of call deemed
appropriate by a Police of Fire Officer.
.I Extensive Training and Feedback -- CAST Volunteers will receive extensive training in
everything from Police and Fire Department operations to community assistance
resources to emotional first-aid; CAST volunteers wiJI participate n on-going training that
will include feedback from victims, Police and Fire officers and other CAST volunteers.
.I Highly Commirred CAST volunteers -- through the volunteer application, screening
training and performance evaluation processes, volunteers wiJI express a high level of
commitment to the program.
What CAST Volunteers do:
What CAST Volunteers will not do:
.
provide emotional support;
notify family, friends and clergy;
make necessary phone calls;
help arrange follow up services;
provide information and referrals to
appropriate social service agencies;
follow up on client's welfare.
.
compromise the client' s confidentiality;
intrude into the client's lie beyond their
wishes;
give legal, medical, psychological or
spiritual advice.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
How the CAST Program work:
The underlying concept is that these services can be provided through a broad based community
coalition made up of local emergency services providers and social services agencies. It will
be overseen by a Board of Directors representing the City of Chula Vista, those agencies and
other concerned citizens. Daily administrative and volunteer operations wiJI be coordinated by
two volunteer consultants: a Volunteer Coordinator and an Administrative Manager.
C.A.S.T. BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Richard P. Emerson
Pam Smith
Kevin M. Hardy
Emerald Randolph
Jim Hardiman
Rick Brand
Tom Leonard
John Allen
~-.~
CAST FUNDING SOURCES
CAST funding has to date been provided exclusively through donations of time and effort from
the Board of Directors, the Chula Vista Human Services Council, Chula Vista Community
Hospital, Scripps Hospital Chula Vista, Hartson Medical Services, South Bay Municipal Court,
and several individual citizens and privately owned businesses.
The Vista Hill Foundation has provided office space, meeting rooms, and access to voice and
data processing equipment.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
FUNDING APPLICATION FOR 1993-94
ProgramlProject Name: CSCD Chula Vista Job Club
Name of Organization: Community Service Center for the Disabled (CSCD)
Contact Person: Patricia Yeager
Title: Executive Director
Address:
Telephone:
1. Amount of Funding requested:
$13,000
2. Amount of 1992-93 CDBG Funding:
$9,000
3. If this Is an existing program, how many
years has It served Chula Vista residents?
5 years (Job Club)
(Note: CSCD has provided other support services to CV residents for 15 years. These
are described in question #5 and Attachment A)
4. Is this program physically located In Chula Vista?
Yes
5. Describe the main goals, objectives, and activities of your organization:
CSCD provides eight no-fee support services to residents with disabilities throughout
San Diego County. They are: I)Financial Benefits Counseling, 2) Client Assistance
Program, 3) Housing assistance and referral, 4) Personal assistance referral, 5)
Independent Living Program, 6) Employment Services {including the Chula Vista Job
Club}, 7) Information and referral, and 8) Peer Counseling. These services are the
cornerstone towards achieving independence, employment and public participation.
(Services are explained in Attachment A)
6. Describe the specific program for which funds are requested.
The CSCD Job Club of Chula Vista has the mission to empower people with disabilities
to prepare for and complete a job search successfully. The Job Club is operated on
location at the California Department of Rehabilitation office in Chula Vista. It is the
intent of the program to continue to offer:
1
a. Job Search Skills Workshops: (approximately 12 hours each) application and resume
development, appropriate dress and hygiene, interviewing techniques, job search
methods, disability rights as they relate to employment, introduction to PASS (flans for
Achieving ~eJf-~upport) and educational programs designed to enhance vocational skills.
b. Individual and group counseling: (approximately 20 hours for each consumer).
Consumers receive assistance in:
1. vocational exploration and assessments (including transferrable skills)
2. developing resumes
3. writing flans for Achieving ~elf-~upport (PASS) to secure funding for employment-
related needs.
4. job development/placement services - the Job Club Coordinator helps consumers
identify the skills, qualifications, and training needed to reach their occupational
objectives.
c. Chula Vista Job Club clients will also benefit from the central CSCD's office of
Employment services (funded with non-CDBG funds) which maintains a larger resource
library and aims at improving employment practices for disabled workers within the
business community. In addition, at the central office, consumers may receive financial
benefits counseling on the impact of employment on benefits.
7. Why is this program needed in Chula Vista?
The 1990 Census identified 4,159 residents of Chula Vista as having disabilities
impeding mobility and/or self-care, and being between the ages of 16 and 64. A portion
of this age group is employable, and with proper skills, training and initial assistance,
they will increase their potential towards independent living and self-sufficiency. The
Disabled American Survey conducted by the International Center on Disability (ICD) in
1985, revealed that only one third of the respondents who were working age were
employed, while sixty percent (60%) of those unemployed stated that they wanted to
work.
Several factors contribute to the high unemployment rate among the disabled
community. Inadequate job seeking skills, the need for prevocational training, feared
loss of public benefits, a lack of disability awareness among employers, architectural
barriers and the need for accommodation in the work place are a few of the leading
causes of unemployment for people with disabilities.
The Job Club would diminish these hindrances towards self-sufficiency by
implementing the program described above.
8. Who will be providing the services? Briefly describe qualifications of key staff and
indicate their level of education/training:
Job Services Coordinator: This position was vacated January 1993 and candidates are
being fielded for hire. The qualifications are: experience in job search assistance and
2
job development/placement for people with disabilities; excellent organizational skills
with good written and oral communication. Awareness of various vocational training
and entrepreneurial technical assistance venues. Knowledge of American Disability Act
and employment law.
Manager, Employment Services/Job Placement Specialist: coordinates the Chula Vista
Job Club, and Employment Services at CSCD in San Diego. This position will not be
funded by CDBG funds, but wiIl provide both overaIl administration and direct services.
9. Program Budget: Total $26,696
CDBG
ornER
FUNDS
Salaries/Fringe Benefits:
$13,000.00
$10,746.00
Equipment/Supplies:
Travel
Printing
Telephone
Postage
Accounting
Insurance
400.00
1,000.00
250.00
250.00
150.00
600.00
300.00
Subtotals:
$13,000.00
$13,696.00
Rent/Utilities: Department of Rehabilitation provides a room at the Chula Vista office
on a no fee basis to CSCD. .
10. Specify exactly how the CDBG funds will be used:
CSCD proposes to use $13,000 of CDBG funds from the City of Chula Vista, matched
with $13,696 from the California Department of Rehabilitation, to fund the staff salaries
to implement the Job Club program in Chula Vista.
{a}. Twenty (20) Job Club workshops during the '93-'94 fiscal year, approximately
twelve (12) hours per work shop;
{b}. Individual and group counseling (as described in 6.b.): approximately twenty (20)
hours per consumer. During the FY '93 - '94 program year, it is anticipated that
approximately 110 unduplicated clients will receive service assistance from the Chula
Vista Job Club. Of this number, it is projected that 99 will be Chula Vista residents.
3
11. Please list the name and amount oC other secured or potential sources oC Cunding
Cor this specific program:
California Department of Rehabilitation: $13,696.00
12. Do you anticipate needing CDBG Cundlng Cor this program In subsequent year?
Yes
If yes, how much Cundlng will needed each year?
1994-95 $14.000 1995-96 $15.000 1996-97 $15.000
13. Who will be served by your program and what are the boundaries oC your service
area?
The Job Club serves all referrals from the South Bay Department of Rehabilitation
office. A majority will be Chula Vista residents, however, residents from other areas will
be served. In addition, if Job Oub clients need further assistance in other program
areas, they will be referred to CSCD's main office on University Avenue in San Diego.
The services they receive at that location will be administrated from separate funding
sources.
All CSCD consumers must have a disability as defined by the Rehabilitation Act of
1973, and reside within San Diego County.
14. How do people find out about your program? How do you outreach?
Consumers are referred to the Job Oub by the South Bay Department of Rehabilitation
counselors. In addition, disabled consumers are referred by the local offices of the
Social Security Administration, the County Department of Social Services, Southwestern
College's Disabled Student Services, local social service agencies like the MAAC
Project, and by word-of-mouth within the Chula Vista disability community.
Outreach is furthered by publicity through the 2,000 subscnber CSCD newsletter, and
when local media outlets provide public service announcements regarding CSCD. In
addition, CSCD administrators and managers are encouraged to devote ten percent of
their time to volunteer citizen advisory boards and other civic organizations.
15. Do you assist clients to get to your program site or provide services out In the
community?
Although CSCD no longer operates lift-equipped vans, consumers are referred to the
American Red Cross transportation service for the disabled. Besides the Job Club in
4
ChuIa Vista, CSCD provides employment services at its central location in Hillcrest, and
also at CSCD North, located in the City of Escondido.
16. For this sDeclfic Droeram for which CDBG Is reQuested. estImate the total number
of: (Answers {a} - {c} relate to the Job Club only. Number selVed and estimated to
receive all general services are depicted in {d} - {f}.)
{a}. Total clients selVed or estimated to be selVed in:
1993-94 120
1992-93 110
1991-92 90
{b }. Chula Vista residents selVed or estimated to be selVed in:
1993-94 108
1992-93 99
1991-92 85
{c}. Low-income clients selVed or estimated to be selVed in:
1993-94 120
1992-93 110
1991-92 90
Figures below depict clients selVed with the eight no-fee services described in
Attachment A. Chula Vista Job Club clients are not reflected in these numbers.
{d}. Total clients selVed or estimated to be selVed in:
(Estimate)
(Estimate)
(Actual)
1993-94 2500
1992-93 2500
1991-92 2700
{e}. ChuIa Vista residents selVed or estimated to be selVed in:
(Estimate)
(Estimate)
(Actual)
1993-94 150
1992-93 130
1991-92 142
{f}. Low-income clients selVed or estimate to be selVed in:
(Estimate)
(Estimate)
(Actual - Chula Vista)
1993-94 100%
1992-93 100%
1991-92 142 (100%)
5
17. What methods will you use to account for the Income level and other demographic
inronnation on your clients?
An initial interview is conducted with each consumer seeking CSCD's assistance. At
that time, an intake application is completed, a history taken, eligibility established, and
a source and level of income determined. Each client is assigned an identification code
which in imputed into a computer data-base. Monthly reports reflect demographics and
income levels and provide a method for monitoring to ensure that only clients within
the low and moderate incomes will be serviced with CDBG funds. In addition, all
CSCD consumers must have a disability as defined by the Rehabilitation Act of 1973.
6
-~
REV. 2/93
CSCD BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Officers
CHAIR
Ronald L. Penksa
Vice President, Investments
Great Western Financial Securities
TREASURER
Burt Eaves
Vice President & Manager
El Cajon, CA 92020-4584
VICE-CHAIR
Royce Hamrick*
Engineering Consultant
-
San CA 92120
SECRETARY
Anne Heller
Assoc. Dean of Disabled students
San Diego Community college District
San Diego, CA 92116
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Members
Area Manager
Ray Uzeta*
Executive Director
Chicano Federation
610 22nd Street - work
San Diego, CA 92102
---
Diane Ward
CPA
Ward & Associates - work
5230 Carroll Canyon Road, ste. 106
San Die 0 CA 92121
].
. Sharon Terrill
Public Affairs Manager
Pacific Bell
525 B street, Ste. 1770 - work
San Diego, CA 92101
Elizabeth Bacon*
Director
SDSU Disabled Student Services
REV. 2/93
Berenice Bernard.
Architect
San Diego, CA 92115
cyndi Jones.
Editor
Mainstream Magazine
2973 Beech Street - work
San Diego, CA 92102
Michael Conroy.
Disa .. vocate
San Diego, CA 92109
2
CITY OF CHULA VISTA.
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
FUNDING APPLICATION FOR 1993-94
NOTE: THIS APPLICATION IS DUE NO LATER THAN MARCH 1, 1993 AT 5
P.M. AT THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT, 276 FOURTH AVE., CHULA VISTA.
Program/Project Name:
OIrfrPn~h HPnlth F..dl1rfltion
Name of Organization:
Episcopal Cannrmity Services
Contact Person: M Jean Serafy
Title Director, El:S Family Health Centers
Address:________.
S~n Dipgn CA 92103
Telephone
I. Amount of Funding Requested:
$ 20 000.00
2. Amount of 1992-93 CDBG Fundinl::
$ 10.000.00
3. If this is an existing program, how many
years has it served Chula Vista residents?
15+ years
4. Is this program physically located in Chula Vista?
Yes
5. Describe the main goal(s), objectives, and activities of your organization:
Episcoal Cannrmity Services (El:S) is dedicated to building healthy cannUIllllCS.
Our objective is to administer over 400,000 service rmils annually by providing:
1. 38,000 rreclical visits at our Family Health Centers which include general
health evaluations, imnUIlizations, and treatment, pediatrics, family planning,
perinatal, cOUIlseling, case management, HIV s=eening and lreatment, and health
education.
2. 136 half day sessions to 500 children (resulting in 68,000 service UIlilS)
in our South Bay Head Starl which include training in social and medical skills,
prevention educalion and health screenings, plus case management for lhe families.
3. 75,000 individual and group interactions al our Drug Abuse services which
include drug treatment, recovery, prevention, and educalion services. Programs
provide clinical and social model programming. Individual and cannrmity
empovermenl strategies are advocaled. Specialized services related to HIV/AIDS
are provided.
4. 135,000 individual and group imeractions at our Alcohol Recovery services
which include prevention, education, intervention, and refe=al services. Programs
provide recovery planning and intervenlion planning, safe and sober environments
wilh 12-slep meelings, educalion and peer suppcrt groups. Programs also address
issues of conmUIlity/organizalion educalion in order to reduce alcohol H,laucd
probIcms wilhin the conmunit.y. (OVlT)
6. Describe the specific program for which funds are requested: (If you are only
requesting funds for general organizational support, go to question # 10).
The funds will be used by the Ex:S Family Health Center in Chula Vista (Otay
Crnmunity Clinic) to continue the position of Outhreach Health Educator to
work at the Drug and Alcohol Recovery Centers, Head Start Centers, the Otay
Health Center, and provide group and individual presentations to carrnunity
groups and other agencies, organizations, and canpanies regarding healthy and
sober lifestyle behaviors.
7. Why is this program needed in Chula Vista?: People in recovery do not consider
health status a priority. Parents of preschoolers have may priorities of which
health education is low on the list. Patients at the Family Health Center have
just begun to receive the health education now that a funding source has been
identified. Since the majority of our Clients/parents/patients live in Chula
Vista, we have identified a need to improve the halth status of the carrnunity.
Additional health problems identified in the crnmunity include high cholesterol,
obesity, heart disease, smoking, early care for pregancy and children not
inmunized properly.
8. Who will be providing the services? Briefly describe qualifications of key
staff and indicate their level of education/training:
An Outreach Health Educat.or will be providing the services. A BA in Nursing or
Health Education is required. One year prior experience required. The Outreach
Health Educator will be responsible for developing long and short term goals
for health education practices/sessions. Outreach Health Educator will assess
the needs and abilities of patients and will conduct individual and group health
education sessions. See the attached job description for a more detailed surrmary
of responsibilities and minimum requirements.
9. Program Budget: Total: $ 37.000.00
(Include only those expenses directly related to the program for which funding is
requested).
Salaries/Benefits:
CDBG
$ 17,000.00
OTHER FUNDS
$ 11,400.00
Rent/Utilities:
1,200.00
1,000.00
Equipment/Supplies:
500.00
300.00
Other Mileage/
Bus Tokens
Other Mqrrt Fee
1,300.00
800.00
Other
Subtotals:
$ 20,000.00
$ 17,000.00
10. Specify exactly how the CDBG funds will be used:
The funds will pay 60% of the salary and benefits of an Outreach Health Educator;
60% of the rent/utilities for a health promotion office at otay Community Clinic;
60% of the health education rraterials and supplies, and 60% of the travel
expense incurred during outreach efforts for both the Outreach Health Educator
and clients accessing our services.
11. Please list the name and amount of other secured or potential sources of
funding for this specific program:
State Dept. of Healt.h Services Expanded Access to Prirrary Care -
Federal Healthcare for the Haneless Project -
Medi-Cal
Total Ot.her Sources
$10,000.00
3,000.00
4,000.00
$17 ,000.00
12. Do you anticipate needing CDBG funding for this program in subsequent
years? Yes X No
If yes, how much funding will be needed each year?
1994-95 $20,000 1995-96 $ 20,000 1996-97 $ 20,000
13. Who will be served by your program and what are the boundaries of your
serv ice a rea?
Prirrarily the indigent. populat.ion of Chula Vista and surrounding communities
in the South Bay. All of our program sites are located in Chula Vista. Our
target population is 70% Latino, 20% Caucasian, and 10% others. They have low
to moderate incane, are uninsured or underinsured. They rray be substance
abusers, illiterate and unemployed without perrranent housing.
14. How do people find out about your program? How do you do outreach?
We currently have a large client./patient base to refer for services initially.
The OUtreach Health Educator will also utilize flyers and brochures to
publicize the added services. The Outreach Health Educator will provide
educational presentat.ions at community sites. We also utilize community forums,
newsletters and newspapers to infonn the people of our services.
15. Do you assist clients to get to your program site or provide services out in the
community?
We can provide bus tokens to prospective clients in order to aG:;,cess our health
center on-site services. The Outreach Health Educator will be at the ECS
program sites for special omreach dforts and will provide health education
at community sites as needed/requested.
16. For this specific program for which CDBG is requested, estimate the total
number of:
a. Total clients served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94 6621
1992-93 ')RhO
1991-92 5170
b. Chula Vista residents served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94 4048
1992-93 3806
1991-92 3582
c. Low-income clients served or estimated to be served in:
(low-income household is defined as follows: 1 person =$23, 150; 2person=$26,450;
3person =$29,750; 4person =$33,050)
1993-94 6541
1992-93 5508
1991-92 4898
17. What methods will you use to account for the income level and other
demographic information on your clients?
We will be able to account for the incare level and other demographic
infonnation on our clients by use of our Patient Registration fonns which
asks illcare and demographic questions.
This infonnation is then placed in our canputer database to generate
demographic report ing.
PLEASE ATTACH THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
a) A PROGRAM BROCHURE OR FLYER (if you have one)
b) A CURRENT LIST OF YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS (one page)
c) A COMPLETE LIST OF CURRENT SOURCES OF REVENUE (one page)
BUILDING
HEALTHY
COMMUNITIES
EPISCOP AL
COMMUNITY
SERVICES
1990-1991
EPISCOPAL COMMuNITY SERVICES
Bo.a..rd of D:Lrec:tors
~992-~993
Mrs. L. Ann Bannister
San DiEco C1 92130 210
Class or 1993 (1)
~~. Ronald P. Bird
San Diego CA 92101
Class of 1992 (1)
Li.a:i3oo - CO Advisory Cotmcil *
M=. ~rank B. Ensign, Jr.
-
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Class of 1994 (1)
Treasurer
Dr. E. Clare Friedman
La Jolla, CA 92037
Class of 1992 (1)
VP - Persomlel. *
The Rev. Tally H. Jarrett
~5
Class of 1994 (1)
Mr. James Parks
Cbula Vista, CA 92013
Mr. Leslie E. Marsball
San Diego CA 92l~
Class of 1991 (1)
Ms. Elvi J. Olesen
La Jolla CA 92037
Class of 1994 (2)
~I. Irving W. Parker, KSG
Santee CA 92071
Class of 1992 (2) EX!: 2667
Presideot*
FAX:
FAX:
....
FAX:
- _1___
FAX:
~y
San Diego C;l 92113
Class of 1993 (1)
~oss
La Jolle, CA 92037
.if' Harold P. Field
Coronado CA 92118
Class of 1993 (1)
Chair:Don - I'8cilities*
Hz. lDtoinette Harris
Coronado CA 92118
Class of 1993 (2)
~
San Diego, CA 92127
Mrs. Anne T. Marsball
La Jolla CA ~
Class of 1994 (2)
CbaiJ:mlm - !IaIIinatiDg*
Mr. H"A Mathis
San Diego CA 92122
Class of 1993 (1)
Mr. Robert D. Orphey
La Jolla CA~7
Class of 1993 (2)
1\[. Donald J. Quackenbush
La Jolla, CA 92037
Class of 1994 (1)
~
FAX:
,
,
FAX:
--
FAX:
FAX:
.-.
-
--
~apt. Micnael M. Raggett ......
e IH)
Coronado C. 92118 La Jolla C. 92037 .
Class of 1993 (1) Class of 1994 (2) FAX:
VP - Rescurce Develcpzlent
Mr. G. '.illiams Rutherford Mr. Warren Sands
Charlotte Bushnell House . .
r c1_ . San Diego CA 92128
San Dlego Class of 1993 (1) FAX:
Class of 1993 (1)
VP - Program EYaloat.l.on"
~.r. Stirling O. Tomkins ~.r. E. Bert Valentine
San Diego Cl 92103 - Solana Beach CA 92075 - I
Class of 1993 (2) FAX: Class of 1993 (2) FAX:
The Rev. Jennifer R. Ve.rvynck
1
Vista C1 92083
Class of 1994 (1)
FAX:
l!s. llizabetll IIaJ.ker
San Diego Cl 92111
Class of 1993 (2)
C!lai.rmoD - PlIr:I.oh ~
..
FAX:
"
La Jolla, CA 92037
Class of 1994 (1)
.
~
FAX:
Mrs. Shirler Williamson
Corooado Cl 92118
Diocesan EC-. Pres.
WIll'
Mrs. Nell F. l/al tz
Mrs. Lenora T. Witt
San Diego CA 92106
Class of 1994 (2)
Secmary
FAX,!
Mr. Lee Johnson
San Diego, Cl ~
Bishop Getbin B. Hughes
San Diego, Cl 92103
CONTRACT:
CONTRACT:
CO~T1:ACT :
CONTRACT:
COi'\TRACT:
GRA~T:
GRA~T:
CO'\TRACT:
EPISCOPAL COMMUNITY SERVICES
HEALTH EDUCATION
ANTICIFATED FU~DS BY SOURCE
FISCAL YEAR 1992 93
DEPT. OF HEALTH
SERVICES-PRIMARY
CARE LOCAL
OFFICE OF FAMILY
PLANNING STATE
STEWART MCKI'\i'\EY
HOMELESS CARE ACT FEDERAL
COVNTY MEDICAL
SERVICES
LOCAL
DcrT. OF HEAL Tii
SERVICES EAPC
STATE
U:\ITLD WAY
LOCAL
CDllG CHULA
VISTA
LOCAL
~'..'!~,\ \n::'TE
..... f ...... '! ~~ T "!" 1 T I '
. "- ...--. .,.1"....
~_'T.nr'n. '
1 .. l~ L...:' '., > L.
$3:2C, 63t~
~ :20,GOS
$ 34, GSO
~:11S,1~.3
::~:2 ~ ~, G 4 ::
$ 40,000
~ 1 0 I II t~ U
-;: , I.. -
.. j
-'~; i_.
7/:1:-(;/93
7,'9~ G/~~3
7/~j~ C, ~J3
- ~-J~ t;/~~;
~/'l: C/:l3
"';' IU''''
'i ....-
b, ~J 3
- ~l:2 f; I 9:~
7,' ~.i ~
'j'"
" .i.'
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
{,
MAR 1993
C<l Received
mmur.tt\' Develop
D . ment
epartment
Program Name:
Episcopal Community Services
Name of Organization: South Bay Alcohol and Drug Abuse Services
Contact Person: Maria Elena Verdugo Title: Program Manager
Telephone:
Address:
1. Amount Requested: $ 35,000
2. Amount of 1992-93 CDBG Funding $ 0
3. If this is an existing program,
how many years has it served
Chula vista residents?
14
years
4.
Is this program physically located in Chula Vista?
ves
5. Describe the main goal(s), objectives, and activities
of your organization:
Alcohol goals: We provide support
concerned about alcohol problems.
suffering, social damage and economic
problems, especially alcoholism.
Object i ves: Prevent the deve 1 opment of a 1 coho 1 prob 1 ems among
people who have not yet become problem drinkers, especially among
young people. Help people who are affected by or suffer from
alcohol problems to recover and start that recovery process as
early as possible. Involve local individuals, groups and
institutions ln the resolution of their community's alcohol
problems.
Actlvities: Alcohol Education Workshops, Alcohol Free Events
(social), Community services, group meetings, Special activities
for Teens and Women
and resources to anyone
To reduce the personal
costs re 1 ated to a 1 coho 1
Drug:
To provide a supervlsed safe supportive recovery environment for
individuals with drug abuse problems, including pregnant and
parent i ng women and the i r ch i 1 dren, engage these i ndi vi dua 1 sin
recovery through support groups specifically addressing denial,
parent i ng issues, re 1 at i onsh ips; achi eve pos it i ve changes in an
individual's behavior, health, feelings and/or relationships; to
minimize the incidence and impact of drug use, misuse and abuse,
through the implementation of prevention strategies designed to
promote personal and community growth.
6. Describe the specific program for which funds
(If you are on 1 y requesting funds for general
support, go to question #10)
are requested:
organizational
Funding is requested for a new A/C unit. Our present unit is in
extremely poor condition. Some of our clients are children and
sickly people through their drug and alcohol abuse. These people
freeze in the summer and sizzle in the winter. If our center is
uncomfortable, they will not come to our center.
7. Why is this program needed in Chula Vista?
with the exception of the Versus Street Methadone Clinic, we are
the only other treatment and recovery center in Chula Vista.
8. Who wi 11
qual ifications of
education/training:
We have two estimates:
be providing
key staff
services?
and indicate
Briefly
their
describe
level of
Jackson and Blanc:
Air Doc:
$40,000.00
$32,875.00
9. Program Budget: Total: $ 255.000.0
(Include only those expenses directly related to the program for
which funding is requested).
CDBG
OTHER FUNDS
This is all covered in funding:
Salaries/Benefits:
$
$
Rent/Utilities:
Equipment/Supplies:
Other
Other
Other
Subtotals:
$
$
10. Specify exactly how the CDBG funds will be used:
These funds will be used to purchase a new Ale unit.
11. Please list the name and amount of other secured or potential
sources of funding for this specific program:
At present we have no other funding. We operate on donations and
county funding.
12. Do you anticipate needing CDBG funding for this program in
subsequent years? YES X NO
If yes, how much funding will be needed for each year?
1994-95$ 20,000 1995-96$30.000 1996-97$40,000
13. Who will be served by your program and what are the boundaries
of your service area?
We serve multi-ethnical and multi-cultural groups in the overall
South Bay area. including low-income, handicapped, children.
14. How do people find about your program? How do you do
outreach? Our outreach program is as fo 11 ows: resource fa i rs,
direct mailing of flyers, alcohol and drug education classes in
high schools and colleges, parti~ipation with other agencies in
presentations of forums, organization of coalition campaigns, and
neighborhood partnerships.
15. Do you assist clients to get to your program site or provide
services out in the community?
Not at the present time.
16. For this specific program for which CDBG is requested,
estimate the total number of:
a. Total c1 ients served
served in:
We count facility visits:
or estimated to be
1993-94 45.000
1992-93 40,000
1991-92 35,000
b. Chula Vista residents served or estimated
to be served in:
1993-94
1992-93
1991-92
45,000
40,000
35,000
c. Low-income clients served or estimated
to be served in:
(low-income household is defined as follows:
1 person=$23,150; 2 person=$26,450; 3 person
$29,750; 4 person=$33,050)
1993-94
1992-93
1991-92
45,000
40,000
35,000
17. What methods will you use to account for the income level and
other demographic information on your clients?
Our fees are sliding scale, but we turn no one away regardless of
race, color, sex or religion. Volunteer hours are a way to pay
fees also.
PLEASE ATTACH THE FOLLOWING ITEMS;
a. a program brochure or flyer (if you have one)
b. a current list of your board of directors (one page)
c. a complete list of current sources of revenue (one page)
01/14/89 05:29
Ul. '358818S1
A I R I(:':;:=,
F'AI3E 0'2
'ropoual
r/W Z'~
Heating & Air Conditioning
Ucense #420178
pase No.
Of
t'/IIle.
453 Vernon Way · El Cajon, CA 92020
(619) 588-9703 . S.D. (619) 574-6400
FAX: (619) 588-1891
341 Park Wy
....-
691-8164
Jot "'AME.
Same
.101 LOCAftOff
Same
DATE
IlItOPOUl. lulhlfTrlCI TO
SO. Bay Alcohol , Drug Serv
3-1-93
TRUT
CITY. ,TAli AND ZIP COol
Chula vista CA 91910
^1Rl'lI'Il'
Attnl Linda Hodge
CAn or PlAN'
JOB PHONE
Fax 1425-3325
w. ",.reby .....b"ul .peclticltlon. Ind flhmalulor
_..u~emo~f!!_ ..'!ll~.h~in'Lc;:onden5er fr.oJ!I ro~f and r'!R1~<:::El.~j, th_'trane.-1L.....L.t..O'!l-
,____cCl~l.ins._~I.1~. fOO,OOO.BTU he~ti~..rooJ..!:ClJ2~k!'~~Jlit.--~'E..W unit w..iU.___
_ ,._, b..~_.e'lu.~.P~W_!!!LecOE.<:?-ll!.izerJ-whic.n- wih!. make u_s.~_ClL9.1Jj:side a.i~.he.n___
_,_._ _u_be1o~- ?1"-._ ,!,h.is willn~av~n at le~Bt 4Q.t. Clll~l~.9~rica.Lcosts-'u-an~
__alsO- ~....!I_e_w_ .,!,~ane .!I'.u~~.tage t~ermQ~J;~h_J::onI1~ct._I).~J'l_ unit_t.Q ex.i.s~9
.duct~o_:r:.k. ~~.d_.~~p,_t;~~O.~..s~ly dUC.J:& .to front are!'!.-'------__
. .~quip~~!\_t:~.._ _ ____ ---.. -------. ._--... --- ----- --- -'--
1-Tran~__YCD2!O-B}~9~. _17 ._5 ~o~g~!!~ .--~---.-_e-'
l-Tra~E! _B_a.YeC?o!!.-.Q.~3}l. ecol1!2!llizer.__ ...---. --------
l_':"TE~ne.B-ay.e-n.s _1218 .Jll1J1 ty-::s~~!_!1erl!\.osta.t_.___
_n__ .__warran~:-_ _u___ --.- ----..--
_____ One_(lLyea.L9.I!.. ~l.LE!~1;!Lan(t labor (per manyhgt.urerl
__..Fi,ve !?L~.a..r.s..9!Lc;:-0I}lpres.!i9r (per manufacturer) ----
~en (101 Y_~!S!'.IO PlLl.l!fI)ac~-heatexchanqer {IillLm!!nufacturerl
.-_._---~.-
.._---~._--~.. . ---... -..-- ----.
.-. --- --- --------.---
._-----.- ....-----------
If any legal action i. necessary 10 enforce the tenn$ of this agreement, !he prevailing party .holl be entilled to reasonoble
attorney f..s in addition 10 any other relief to which h. may be enti~ed.
=
III, 'topOS' hereby to furnish material and labor - complete In accordance with abo...~ specltications, for the sum of:
five and no/100 32,875.00
dollars ($'
)
Thirty two thousand eight hundred seventy
PaytMnt ta bt macM ., lollo........
25% on order of equipment
50% on set of equipment
Bal of 25% on completion
A.'''''..'Olj ",,;-7/ -A? #: ----LJ
Slcn,alurf ,~ <"'7'...4'Yl--"{ ~.-~// t ~
Nole This propas.al may be
wIU'dr.... by u\ If not accepl~ ""!thln 9 0 _ __~ dayt.
All 111.,,,,_1 II .1J",n".C1 to h et '~II~ All ...0'11 to bII CQITl."ltlfCI In I wl:HII.m~I'"
tn.fIIIlf ,(cofeM. ta .,."C1_n1 ,Ilf'cIIUt. Any "'ln110n Or d"-I.t,on lraf'fl .b<l.... .-ctft(..
II(ln_ 1",,01.,1'11 loIr. (,0". ....111 b. ...ewIH only w;on *rlttl'n ofC14n, ,,,. wdl\>Koml an
__lr. c~.r;" ~II ",. .114.... tl'l" ,telm_tl '11.,r..m,nl. conllnlll'lt "pon II'III.U, accl4.lIh
or dll_p tMiJlonCl OYr conl,ol O",n" to ,art)' III't, IO'n_elQ _no otl'lfl ,,_~',ury Insvr.nC;'
0"" worlle'" ar. 'ul1)1 to..,.d b., Worllmln', ComoenM~iO'" 1"'1.1.11_"<:.
Attl'ptnnrt nf Jroposal- Tho .0<>'< p'"'' ."."t,ea"o.,
.and condltiMlI. .1f. uhlfutory 'I'd If' hereby .CCIPtrd, You are lJulhonzed S'."'\''''f'
... .... ..... ~....." ... .......;41....1 P~".......... _.11 _ ......Ii. ".. ......1 ,I'\M .tww..
~----'."---- ----~- -------.
01/14/89 06:29
6195881891
AIR DOC
1-',:4I_.:1t.. U,::
'rllpllsul
~ Z,6e
Heating & Air Conditioning
License #420178
,".:160:: I.....
-6~-"
.
453 Vernon Way. E1 Cajon. CA 92020
(619) 588-9703 . S.D. (619) 574-6400
FAX: (619) 588-1891
.."OPOIAL IU'''ITTID TO
SO, Ba Alcohol & Drug Servo
.."...
o"u
TRrtT
691-8164
jOI .-
3-1-93
341 Park Wy
caTY. .'''11 .~o Z... cool
Same
JOB lOCATlOH
Chula Vi.ta CA 91910
DA T( O;:-;;W;;,
Same
JOEl PHON(
Attnl Linda Kodge
We h....b~ I'-Ibml' 'ptelfieallon'and ..tlm.ln fOf.
Fax .425-3325
--_._-,-----,~-_._".. ..._-_._._-----~-~.--_.'_._--
,..~--- ---- --~- ._..--~._--
OPTIONAL WORK TO CONSIDER
-.----.- .._._~,.._.._._~ --- ----.-----..-.. -.---.--.
----..-
_ _ _ Re~C)ve_e~~sti~a-~;---~o~di~iOnin'iL~'i':1i:Eme!l!-iJ:om i.Il!,id~ -~ ----.--
...--_-bui!d!?9,---. _____ _________---- _ ____n__ --- -- ---------
Cost---------$2000.00
.-----. - -- .-' .-" --,----' ----- .-- -~-_.'---
-...- ---<.--." .-_.~ --.-.-'-" -----
...--.---.,.------ -'--- ._-. ------...--
Replace a!!._r~gi_~~e_x:.~ if_~e_sireSl~ -.---
cost----------$1000.00
- ...-< ---
- - ---
---.--'-' ..----..--,.-- --~-_. ---_.--
_._.--_.----_._-~
---.-.--'-
Th_es~ COB.t8 are ~ot n~ce~.!ar}'_ in orde~to install__new___ -----
air_.~o_n~_i ~i~n~!l(i!.'_ s~~.~~_m!_l:low~ver -,~_a_~ be __9-_on~ if _Aes ired. -
----.----.--.-.-
.--- ._-- -- .- --- -------.-
-- -.--. ~-_._----_.._--_.~--~.._.
-_..--- .-- -_._~------ ~----_.--,_._-'-
._.._,--- --_.,---_.-~---~_.- --.-.-----.---.---
.._.~_._.._--_.-_._--,---_.~,.----.-~---_..---- -----.--.--
If any legal action i, nec.ssory to enforce the lerms of thi, agreement. the prevailing party ,hall be entilled 10 rea,onable
allomey f.e. in addilion ta any other relief 10 which he may be enlilled.
.. 'rOp118' hereby to furnls.h m"terilt and labor _ ccmplete in accordance Wt!" above Sp@CI'IC(Stlon~, lor thf sum of
doll.ar~ ($
p.yrNnt to be, mid. Ii> lallowl:
--------.-------- ---~--~.._-~-~_._.-
-'II ",ltlf,tl ;, IUlrlntaH 10 lilt I' 'PfC',Iield, All war~ to '- (ompl.l" ,n . ....or..m..nuu
mlllt'l,r 41CCOrdl". to lta"'41ltd p'.'\IC.... ~"'r alt.r..t,oFl \lot o......tron 'rom ItKl'I' tptllillic"
I.on, in"QiI""" nlr.. ,all ..11 '" .IKutfd (lnly lJpa" wrIU,,, orden, 11'14 w.lt Il<<Clma a,..
..tia cha,.. ovar Ind abelw. tlM .,..mall, ~1I i.,..me"l, e'lle,",_nt ..POll ,trifle" acrold.ntt.
ar dalal" ,,~qnd \lou' tGM,.I, Owner fa u'", fl,., torl'1.11d' ."41 aU".' "".,slt'Y ,l'lt~r..I'1('
Our WO'M'" I,. lull,. CD",.'I' by wllr1lmen'. Cl1tf1p11nNIIOl\ IAsur..n,e
Au1I'lor..z<<J
S,c"atl,lfe
~~C4~1 ~~
Noce: Hit'!. proposal may bt
withdrawn by us it nol ac:cepted W.tl'lll'l
90
day..
SIKnalu"
'-ttrpluntt of 'rop&:lIlll1- Th. ...,'. o,;c.,. .""cofic."o.,
and condition!. .ilrt uII,'<lClory and Ire hereby Jcceptt:d. You jue iiul~orlled
to do Ii'll!! won-. as ,pl'clrj~ FtI)'rnent will De IT'lJde iii outhMtd atloot'l,
Slll\aturC'
,..~.~ ..., .....................
i~
~
.,
H
!!
. <
II
!
:;'"'
"
1"
j
~
;
~i
I'
:y'l
i
! L ~
lr ~
, .
8' .
~ ~~"l3i.~
a;;.~ <;;",1". ~
I"".
i ,....
.~ ~ ~
~S l' !. !
:: i ~ ~
j I
,-.
,
, ,
~ ~
".1"
" ,
'1'- .,
~~'=S
J ~
~ ~
10
I
1
;~
~~
~~~
'6;:
~J
"
'-,
::::i ""
I, ,
t :jj~ l
1"H
.-; ~~1J'3~'
-. ,
M 3~
i' 'I
, ,
~ - ~.- ~~
~ ~~~~ ~~
i .. x ~
/
/
I
l;
i
!
'.
'1'''
.,
I'
j
g
;1g~_________--
;~~~
. 0
il!;I!lM+
"- : ~
;
-
,
~;,
:ji::;;'
"
IS"
'-::;
~
I ;~
;;;
o
;.;..1
. i .t,
'" ,
r~
~ ;;;
i
..
~~
so .
_0 ~? ;:: ?~
~ I
~ ".
.,(;;,;~:x
~!.;n' e:: '/ 1i.~\
! .~ [to
,I, .' :
I ,~... : I:
II1. --;t.--I
\~~,~W
'.<i:;f!J7
~/"/
EPISCOPAL
COMMUNITY
SERVICES
The RI. Ret,. C. Brinkley Morton, Bishop
of the Epi.<,'copal Diocese orSon Diego and
Chairman of the ECS Board of Directors
. SERVICE
. ADVOCACY
. NETWORKING
. MANAGEMENT
Q. What is ECS?
A. Episcopal Community Services is a non-
profit social service agency. An institution
of the Episcopal Diocese of San Diego.
ECS provides community leadership and
direct services through programs which
address specific social problems.
Q. Are your services for everyone?
A. Absolutelyl All programs provide services
without regard to race, religion. sex.
ethnic origin or handicap.
Q. Do you charge for your services?
A. Most services are provided free. When
fees are charged. they can often be
adjusted. No one is refused service due to
an inability to pay.
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES
3776 FOURTH AVENUE, SAN DIEGO, CA 92103
(6191260-8128
Q. What makes ECS unique?
A. ECS provides a broad range of programs
located throughout San Diego County
with services extending into parts of
Riverside and Imperial Counties. For
over sixty years, our guiding principles
have included an active regard for the
whole person, strong advocacy for
removing service barriers, cooperation aad
linkage with other service providers anr:
responsible management of resources.
Q. How are programs funded?
A. Many different sources support ECS
including the Episcopal Diocese of San
Diego, United Way, government contracts,
service fees. foundation grants and tax
deductible donations. Volunteer time, in-
kind contributions and cash donations are
welcome support at any time.
Glenn $, Allison, Executh'e Director
OFFICES,
Santa Ana
Anaheim
Ontario
COlta Mela
San Diego
North Hollywood
LoI Anltelel
San Jose
Perril
Chicago
New York
Walhington, IX:
OFFICERS:
Bert Corona
EucutilJe Dinctor
Nalivo L6pez
Natwnal Co-Dir~tor
Margo de Ley
Natio1lQ.l Co-Director
Marla ROla Ibarra
TreaBurer
Soledad Alatorre
S~rdary
Juan G. Garda
TrUBtee
Hector Brolo
Tru,tee
Rdugio Mejia
TruBtee
HERMANDAD MEXICANA NACIONAL LEGAL CENTER
828 N. Bristol, Suite #204 Santa Ana, Ca. 92703
(714) 541-0250 / fax: (714) 541-4597
Mr. Juan Arroyo
Chula Vista Community Development
276 Fourth Ave.
Chula Vista, CA 91910
3/16/92
Dear Mr. Arroyo:
Having realized that our original CDBG grant request for $ 120,000 is
excessive, I would like to submit the following revision:
Salaries/Benefits
CDBG
$ 30,000
OTHER FUNDS
Rent/Utilities
$ 19,382
8,950
1,500
2,230
1,818
Equipment Supplies
Other: Insurance
Other: Travel and Training
Other: Expenses of classes
and vocational program
67,300
$ 101,180
Totals
$ 30,000
Total amount requested: $ 30,000
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely, /
'i!~,~ ((~)
Nativo Lopez
~
,-,HAS J99J
cn"'\:;lr;',;~>",
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
FUNDING APPLICA nON FOR 1993-94
NOTE: THIS APPLICATION IS DUE NO LATER THAN MARCH 1, 1993 AT 5
P.M. AT THE CIIT OF CHULA VISTA, COMMUNIIT DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT, 276 FOURTH AVE., CHULA VISTA.
Program/Project Name: Parkview Services Project
Name of Organization: Hprmandad Mexicana Nacional Legal Center
Contact Person: Nativo Lopez
Title National Co-Director
Address:
Telephon
I. Amount of Funding Requested:
$ 120,000
2. Amount of 1992-93 CDBG Funding:
$ NA
3. If this is an existing program, how many
years has it served Chula Vista residents?
years
4. Is this program physically located in Chula Vista?
YES
5. Describe the main goal(s), objectives, and .H:tivities of your organization:
Hermandad Mexicana Nacional Legal Center (HMNLC) is dedicated to serving
the immigrant and minority ethnic-American communities of California. The
goal is to successfully assimilate marginalized individuals and families into
the social mainstream. To this end, HMNLC strives for the following objectives:
* Promote English literacy among language-deficient adults and adolescents.
* Assist qualifying individuals to obtain U.S, Citizenship.
* Enhance the employability of participants through vocational training.
* Improve parenting skills among parents of school-age children, and further
to empower those parents as partners in the children's education.
* Emphasize responsibility among residents and citizens, as well as defend rights.
* Foster leadership among adults and youth, through training programs and
issues-oriented associations and committees.
* Encourage involvement in local, civic, social and school affairs, in order
to improve the community through participation by, and for the benefit of
its residents.
6. Des~ribe the specific program for which funds are requested: (If you are only
requestmg funds for general organizational support, go to question # 10).
The *Parkview Services Project is a program that will utilize the Parkview
Housing Project as its hub, serving its residents as well as those in a three-
mile radius. Services will consist of ESL classes, vocational training (and
retention), an after school tutoring program, U.S. Citizenship education and
testing, legal services and information referral, and the orhganization of
residents groups and adult/youth leadership training.
7. Why is this program needed in Chula Vista?:
Among Southern California communities, Chula Vista is among those that
strongly reflect the problems and needs associated with the rapid influx
of monolingual/English-limited persons. Specifically, a large segment of the
population remain in need of literacy and vocational training, in order
to improve their own employability, as well as their ability to handle
daily life in the U.S. Additionally, persons qualifying for U.S. Citizenship
must begin to enjoy their due benefits as well as practice the responsibility
that comes with the fully-integrated status of citizenship.
8. Who will be providing the sery!ces? Brieny describe qualifications of key
staff and indicate their level of education/training:
HMNLC and its staff possess the following experience/qualifications:
* HMNLC has sin.ca.1986 been the largest provider of ESL in the U.S. among
community-based organizations. HMNLC is an approved JTPA training center
as well as an authorized administrator of the U.S. Citizenship Examination.
* HMNLC staff are fully bilingual, culturally competent and technically
qualified.
9. ProgramBudget: Total:$ 131,180
(Include only those expenses directly related to the program for which funding is
requested).
CDBG OTHER FUNDS
Salaries/Benefits: $ 49,382 $
Rent/Utilities:
8,950
Equipment/Supplies:
1,500
Other Insurance
2,230
Other Travel & Tralning
1,818
Other Expense of E~L
classes, vocational
Sn~fo~~~ponents.
67,300
training,
$ 120,000
$
11,180
* The Parkview Apartments are a project of the Chula Vista Housing Corporation,
with which HMNLC is working as a partner in providing services.
10. Specify exactly how the CDBG funds will be used:
- Organize a neighborhood improvement resident group
- Create a community-involved policing organization
- scholarships for 25 residents to attend vocational/retention training
- Organize a neighborhood youth group and program
- Operate an after school tutorial program
- Provide U.S. Citizenship testing and education for qualified applicants
- Provide immigration and legal services
- Information and referral services for residents
11. Please list the name and amount of other secured or potential sources of
funding for this specific program:
$ 11,180 will be contributed in-kind from HMNLC and Chula Vista Housing
Corporation.
12. Do you anticipate needing CDBG funding for this program in subsequent
years? Yes x No
If yes, how much funding will be needed each year?
1994-95 $ 80.000 1995-96 $ 80,000 1996-97 $ 80,000
13. Who will be served by your program and what are the boundaries of your
service area?
The program will serve low-income, monOlingual/English-limited Hispanic
adults and adolescents. The program will be centered in the Parkview Housing
Project, serving its residents as wel1'."as those in an approximately three-
mile radius.
14. How do people find out about your program? How do you do outreach?
Two outreach workers will establish and maintain face-to-face contact with
target persons in the area. Promotion will be realized through printed
and other visual materials, local publicity, referral by affiliates, and
contact with local schools and social-service agencies.
15. Do you assist clients to get to your program site or provide services out in the
community?
Classes will be provided on-site, as
according to demand and convenience.
needed, on a small basis.
well as in the outlying area,
Transportation may be provided. if
16. For this specific program for which CDBG is requested, estimate the total
number of:
a. Total clients served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94 500
1992-93 500
1991-92 500
b. Chula Vista residents served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94 500
1992-93 500
1991-92 500
c. Low-income clients served or estimated to be served in:
(low-income household is defined as follows: Iperson=$23,150; 2person=$26,450;
3person =$29,750; 4person =$33,050)
1993-94 500
1992-93 500
1991-92 500
17. What methods will you use to account for the income level and other
demographic information on your clients?
Hermandad Mexicana Nacional Legal Center and Chula Vista Housing Corporation
have operated in the San Diego region for many years, and hav: conducted
a number of surveys from its offices. U.S. Census date reaff1nns the .
identification of Chula Vista, and in1>articular the area in which the Parkv1ew
Apartments are located, as containing a high percenta~e.and a large amount .
of low-income families and individuals. For the spec1f1c purposes of the proJect,
a pre-enrollment questionnaire will be requested of the participant,
including income information.
PLEASE ATTACH THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
a) A PROGRAM BROCHURE OR FLYER (if you have one)
b) A CURRENT LIST OF YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS (one page)
c) A COMPLETE LIST OF CURRENT SOURCES OF REVENUE (one page)
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Margo De Ley - President
Program CoordinalOr for the Vice-Chancellor for Research, University of Chicago, Illinois.
Nativo L6pez - Secretary
DireclOr, Hermandad Mexicana Nacional, Orange County.
Maria Rosa Ibarra - Treasurer
Co-Director, English Today Institute.
Soledad Alatorre - Trustee
Co-Director, English Today Institute.
Bert Corona - Trustee
National Executive DireclOr, Hermandad Mexicana Nacional.
Juan G. Garcia - Trustee
DireclOr, Union Hispana Newspaper.
Refugio Mejia - Trustee
Coordinator, Hermandad Mexicana Nacional, Santa Ana
Luz Maria Ayala - Trustee
Coordinator, Hermandad Mexicana Nacional, Perris
Hector Brolo - Trustee
CoordinalOr, Hermandad Mexicana Nacional, Los Angeles
BOARD OF ADVISORS
Rudy Acuna, Ph.D.
Professor of Socail Work
Cal State Northridge
Edward Roybal
U.S. Congressman
Manuel Sanchez, Attorney
BOlt, Sanchez and Meadville
Canon John Luce
Cathedral of SI. John the Divine
Ncw York City
Rudy Holguin, Ph.D.
Jose Magdaleno
Professor of Chicano Studies
Cal State Northridge
Arlene Mordasini
Secretary!freasurer, IBT Local 911
Monte Ogden
Secretary!freasurer, IBT Local 692
Mario Garcia, Ph.D.
2
/
I
HERMANDAD MEXICANA NACIONAL LEGAL CENTER. INC.
COMBINED STATEMENT OF SUPPORT, REVENUE AND EXPENSES
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 1992
Public Support and Revenue:
SLlAG . IRCA Grant
Other grants
Legal/Court fees
Membership dues
Program revenue
Donations and fund-raisers
[nlereSt and dividends
Total Publie Support and Revenue
Expenses:
Salaries and wages
Fringe benefits
Repairs and maintenance
Professional services
Ulilities and telephone
Travel and lodging
Conferences and conventions
Fund.raising
Office supplies and e'-penses
Advertising and recruitmem
Printing and postage
Court costs
F:1ciJilies renral
Equipment rental
Dues and subscriptions
InsurJnce
Taxes Jnd licenses
Interest
Book and program supplies
Nonmajor equipment purchases
Major equipment purchases (Note 1)
Depreciation expense
Total Expenses
Excess of Public Support and
Revenue Over Expenses Before
Equipment CapitaliZ.1lion
Equipment purchases capitalized (Note 1)
Excess of Public SuPpOrt
and Revenue Over Expenses
See Notes to Financial Statements
3
S'7,974,1i2
474,951
170,867
242,846
574,875
127,134
23 9'5
9.5R8 800
-.".-
. 5,398,661
. 1,118,001
100,4S8
471,844
224,006
183,053
7.516
23,184
201,782
9,140
231,054
28,847
993,275
58,358
13,393
64 ,855
7,511
142,098
109,636
8,640
2.559
71 329
9,475,230
113.570
2 "'''Q
S 11~.129
~kR W\~
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
FUNDING APPLICATION FOR 1993-94
". '.'::' '. \
'. >,~ ,'\r:,~'~'''l'
';~'_':'1:" :'
NOTE: THIS APPLICATION IS DUE NO LATER THAN MARCil 1,1993 AT 5
P.M. AT THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT, 276 FOURTH AVE., CHULA VISTA.
Program/Project Name:
JOES FOR YOUTH
Name of Organization:
Contact Person: Nora Sears & June 1ril1/Ue
JOBS FOR yOUTH
0irector - Treasurer
Address:
Telephone
Chula Vista, Ca. 91911
I. Amount of Funding Requested:
$ 3,100.00
2. Amount of 1992-93 CDnG Funding:
$ 3,100.00
3. If this is an existing program, how many
years has it served Chula Vista residents?
37
years
4. Is this program physically located in Chula Vista'!
//Yes
5. Describe the main goal(s), objectives, and activities of your organization:
Our main goal is to continue to give each student the
guidance he or she needs to become a successful worker.
Introduce to and instill in all students Jobs and Jobs
Responsibilities. Teenagers to have the right attitudes;
Set high goals; ~ositive out look; To be neat and well
groomed; 2roud of their work; be ready to take initiative;
Always be sincere and honest. Create and maintain an
efficient relaticnship between employers and youth employees.
Assist teenagers in jobs interviews. Create avenue of
additional income for teena~ers of low income families as
for teenagers of moderate lncome families. Continue to
broaden the score of Jobs For Youth to include college
students, Senior Citizens and businesses who require
assistance. Hours assisting students in preparation for
job interviews.
6. Describe the specific program for which funds are requested: (If you are only
requesting funds for general organizational support, go to question # 10).
7. Why is this program needed ill Chula Vista?:
The program was organized right ~ere in Ch~a Vista 37 years ago.
The program is needed in Chula V~sta to continue helping
thousands of youth to find odd jobs. It is conventent to dial
a program in our area and get a dependiable young person to do
a job. It is profitable for the student, who lives in our
community to walk, ride a bicycle or take a bus to his employment.
It is easy to screen all of our students through the Sweetwater
Union High School District. It is very important that we keep
our youth emPLoyed.
8. Who will be providing the services? Briefly describe qualifications of key
staff and indicate their level of education/training:
9. Program Budget: Total: $3,100. OJ
(Include only those expenses directly related to the program for which funding is
requested).
CDBG OTHER FUNDS
Salaries/Benefits: $ 2,400. OJ $
Rent/Utilities:
285.50
299.50
Equipment/Supplies:
Other (Advprtisment)
115. OJ
Other
Other
Subtotals:
$ 3,100.00
$
10. Specify exactly how the CDBG funds will be used: I propose to use the
funds to acquire the necessary supplies tQ keep the office files
up dated; general office supplies and equipment as needed;
extend the telephone resources; Take advantage of the news media
and post printed flyers for exter.sive advertisment.
11. Please list the name and amount of other secured or potential sources of
funding for this specific program:
The City of Chula Vista for the rent.
12. Do you anticipate needing CDBG funding for this program in subsequent
years? Yes X No
If yes, how much funding will be n~eded each year?
1994-95 $3,230.00 1995-96 $J, 2~0. 00 1996-97 $ 3,300.00
13. Who will be served by your program and what are the boundaries of your
service area? All students entering 9th grade Jr. Hi[h; 10th through
12th grades High School and college of families of low income and
students of families of moderate income.
14. How do people find out about your program? How do you do outreach?
Former students employees of Jobs For Youth, now parents call
in to hire students for odd jobs. Pacific bell Telephone books,
under part-time employment; Chula Vista Park and Recreation
trochures each quarter. Letters to churches, businesses and
residents. ,/,'e do outreach by serving the sick and shut-ins,
a one time service of stud~nts first job.
15. Do you assist clients to get to your program site or provide services out in the
community? Sometimes I assist clients to get to our pro gran site
and supervise the job given.
16. For this specific program for which CDBG is requested, estimate the total
number of:
a. Total clients served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94 1. 200
1992-93 1,175
1991-92 1,150
b. Chula Vista residents served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94 1,300
1992-93 1,200
1991-92 1.100
c. Low-income clients served or estimated to be served in:
(low-income household is defined as follows: Iperson=$23,150; 2person=$26,450;
3person = $29,750; 4person = $33,050)
1993-94~OO
1992-93 1,050
1991-92 " ';IUU
17. What methods will you use to account for the income level and other
demographic information on your clients?
I use a Jobs For Youth Voluntary Survey list form to say how
many persons in a household by the amount of income each
family receives.
PLEASE ATTACH THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
a) A PROGRAM BROCHURE OR FLYER (if you have one)
b) A CURRENT LIST OF YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS (one page)
c) A COMPLETE LIST OF CURRENT SOURCES OF REVENUE (one page)
i'hone Number
Jobs F or Youth
333 Oxford Street
Lauderbach Center
Chula Vista, Ca. 91911
619-422-6000
Agency Name
Address"
Current List of our Board of Directors:
Nora Sears. Director
June Brines, Treasurer -
427-1719
Jobs For Youth Recent Annual Organization Budget:
Il'\COIilE:
Chula Vista Block Grant Funds:
~3,100.00
4'3,100.00
EX J:'ENDITURES :
Salary of Office ~orker
Rent/Utilities
Equipment/Supplies
Other Expenses (Advertisment)
;;'2,400.00
285.50
299.50
llS. .)0
4-3,100.00
'1>3.100.00
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
FUNDING APPLICA nON FOR 1993-94
4,
JAN 1993
CrJ RE:ceivr:'c'
nIp; ~i~,::!:,.i,Lr~~:r';1 me 11 t
NOTE: THIS APPLICATION IS DUE NO LATER THAN MARCH I, 1993 AT 5
P.M. AT THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT, 276 FOURTH AVE., CHULA VISTA.
Program/Project Name: Chula Vista Literacy Center
Affiliated with:
Name of Organization: Laubach Literacv Council/San Diego County Inc.(LLC/SDCI:
Contact Person: Hoody Grindle
Title Co-director
Address.
Chula Vista, CA 91911
Telephone
I. Amount of Funding Requested:
$ 1500.00
2. Amount of 1992-93 CDBG Funding:
$
0.00
3. If this is an existing program, how many
years has it served Chula Vista residents?
51
2
years
4. Is this program physically located in Chula Vista?
y e~J
5. Describe the main goal(s), objectives, and activities of your organization:
The Chula Vista Literacy Center is an organization dedicated to
teaching English as a Second Language (ESL). The center is
affiliated with the Laubach Literacy Council/San Diego County, Inc.
(LLC/SDCI) which coordinates and advises approx. 30 centers in San
Diego County. Please see attached brochure.
We are the only program in the South Bay Area that trains volunteer
tutors to teach English as a second language for foreign born adult
learners on a one-to-one (or two) basis.
Our main goal is to teach foreign born adult ]8~rn8rs to ~pn8k,
read and write English so they cnn function in their F~gli~h
speaking community.
Volunteers are trained to teach ESL in an intensive 18 Tutor
Training Workshop. A $30.00 workshop fee is required to cover the
cost of books; a $5.00 fee is included (option"l) for member'Jhip
i Jl th.' LLO/,;]ICI.
10. Specify exactly how the CDllG funds will be used:
Funds will be used exclllsively to purchase teaching materials
for the volunteer tutors.
i.e. books, video tapes (when appropriate), student advancement
checkups and certificates.
II. Please list the name and amount of other secured or potential sources of
funding for this specific program:
A few church members ($75.00/yr.).
My own funds ( approx. $100.00/yr.).
12. Do you anticipate needing CDBG funding for this program in subsequent
years? Yes X No
If yes, how much funding will be needed each year?
1994-95 $ 1 500 . 00 1995-96 $ 1 500. 00 1996-97 $ 1 50 (] . (] 0
13. Who will be served by your program and what are the boundaries of your
service area'?
~ervicing foreign born adults (18 years of age and older).
Area includes Chula Vista, National City, Imferial Beach,
Palm City, South San Diego, Snn Y8idro nnd any area that is
oloser to Chula Vista than it is to other Lnubach Literacy
Centers.
14. How do people find out about your program? How do you do outreach?
Tutors are recruited through articles published in the Union-
Tribuna, Star News and Neighbors newsparers. Our Coucil phone
number is also listed with the National and State Literacy
Program Providers. (Please see attached brochure).
Students come to us mainlv thru student to student contact
(tIle 1Tgrapevine"). Potentia] students also hnve a~cess to tIle
County hotline. VIe do not ~'ind it n8cc",'sary to recruit student::
15. Do you assist clients to get to your program site or provide services out in the
community? "
..."r
We do not provide transportation'students or tutors. However,
we DO provide a home tutoring program when mutually agreeable
and beneficial or necessary fer the tutor and/or student.
6. Dcscribe thc specific program for which funds are rcquested: (If you arc only
requesting funds for general organizational support, go to question # 10).
The Laubach Literacy Program has an ever increasing need for
VOLUNTEER tutors. We occasionally lose potential tutors because
of lack of funds.
Supplying books for volunteers would be a great help to all
of our tutors.
7. Why is this program needed in Chula Vista?:
A common language is the glue that holds a diverse country together.
That reality is especially critical for the United States, a nation
of immigrants from every corner of the earth. Unless we succeed in
preserving English as the fundamental bond of American society,
we risk the kind of divisions that are now splintering Canada.
Our center is dedicated to helping ANYONE who needs and wants
this kind of instruction and support.
8. Who will be providing the services? Briefly describe qualifications of key
staff and indicate their level of education/training:
Woody Grindle co-director.
"Certified Tutor
"Certified Tutor Trainer
"Certified Supervising Tutor Trainer
Vic Arballo co-director
"Certified Tutor
Apprenticing Tutor Trainer
"Laubach Literacy Action (U.S. ~ational Laubach Literacy Org.)
Plus Center Tutors & Home Tutors. (Please see attached list).
9. Program Budget: Total: $
(Include only those expenses direct! y related to the program for which funding is
requested) .
Salaries/Benefi ts:
CDBG
$ 0.00
OTHER FUNDS
$ 0.00
Rent/Utilities:
$ 0.00 (Sponsored by the Community Congregational
Church of Chula Vista).
$ 1500.00
Equipment/Supplies:
Other
Other
Other
Subtotals:
$ 1500.00
$ 0.00
16. For this specific program for which CnBG is requested, estimate the total
number of:
a. Total clients served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94 90
1992-93 74
1991-92 51
b. Chula Vista residents served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94 5 0
1992-93 35
1991-92 25
c. Low-income clients served or estimated to be served in:
(low-income household is defined as follows: Iperson =$23, 150; 2person =$26,450;
3person =$29,750; 4person = $33 ,050)
This information is not available.
1993-94
1992-93
1991-92
17. What methods will you use to account for the income level and other
demographic infonnation on your clients?
We do not require this information. However, occasionally a
tutor or student indicates inability to pay for books. In
these rare cases, our Council provides scholarship funds.
Note: NO Council funds, other than above, are given to the
centers. Council funds are acquired mainly through
membership fees paid by the volunteers. Council funds
are used for Tutor Training Workshops, Publications,
In-service workshops, Communication etc.
PLEASE ATTACH THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
a) A PROGRAM BROCHURE OR FLYER (if you have one)
b) A CURRENT LIST OF YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS (one page)
c) A COMPLETE LIST OF CURRENT SOURCES OF REVENUE (one page)
a) enclosed.
t) Tlle center does not have a Board of Direct",>::. Thr] COlJNCIL do""
hRve n COVERNING Foard or EXJ<:CIJTIVf: Foard. (List enclosed)
C '\ 1) 1 ens e see I';' Fj\1 11.
Organized in 1961
LAUBACH LITERACY COUNCIL OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY, INC.
..
.
EACH ONE TEACH ONE
PRESIDENT
PRESIDENT-ELECT
VICE PRESIDENT
RECORDING SECiT.
TREA~, lJr~ER
CTR. DIR. REP.
c0RRESP. SEC;T.
VIR. OF FLD. DE'.'.
DIR. UF TP~INING
ED I TOR I' KEY I'
HISTORIAN
HOME TUTOR CHAIR
"-'1BERSHTP CHAIR
~ORDS COORIJ.
REPisDCL
SPEA.KERS CF:OUP
Method Developed In 1930
by
Or. Frank C. Laubach
BOARD MEMBERS
January 20, 1993
Edris h'arrcn
FCl'llC Roberts
Sachi A~hida
92027
92127
92128
Leslie Patterson
Fnlnk ~,altcr's
Helen Fl'cistcdt
Peggy Blacklcr
Elizabeth Page
Pat Leahy
Lynn F1cschutz
Rue)' Limerick
Clara ~iacD()nald
Teddy Stcll::ll'
92064
92128
92119
92028
92128
92009
92007
92064
92025
JOr_lnn,~ EUrl1S
42014
42(J09
Teddy St.c 1.1:1..'
Joseph cipolla
9201i..
y21:2;-j
\JO~lIt\.-\Tlt\G CO~1i-"lITTEE:
1993 Cl;:ll1'c' flaxbcUl":i
19'13 ~tcllY -'l'<-1ldunL~an
92028
421~8
~:2{JOl
lq'ji~ christ inc ;-lacf~cn:~i('
91945
1994 Jc:scpllillC ~iglJ.o~"C
1995 Peggy Blacklcr
1995 Ruth RC':;nicl~
92028
92128
Ref: CITY OF CHULA VISTA CDBG FUNDING APPLICATION
for
CHULA VISTA LITERACY CENTER
Attachment b)
Literacy Centers and Home Tutoring
throughout San Diego Coonty
CHULA VISTA LITERACY CENTER
276 II F"St.
Chula Vista, CA. 91910
422-9263
Telephone
i=~~
....
-
~
....
....
-
-
--
-
.-
-
...
-
-
-
-
.....
--
-
-
.....
-
ITS~1 8
Tutor
Student
=
--------
- - - - - - - - - -
Jan. 15, 1993
Telephone
=
Victor Arballo
Prep Class [Appr. 10 Students]
*Elena Rodriguez
.
(011-52-66>1IIIIIIII
-
*Annette ArIan
SHelen Becker
Unassigned
Isabela Beltran
Maria Vargas
Rosa Hungerford
Marge Berry
SRoy Berry
*Michelle Chavez
Unassigned
*Maria de Jesus Perez
*Mae Cooley
*Eva Green
*Edhy Calimente
Mark Croom
Martha Zapata
Maria Lara
Steve Davenport
Trini Mendez
Bertha Torres
*Betty Dawes
*Aurelio Serrano
*Eva Serrano
Helen DeVore
Maria Gilbert
Ellen Diesta
Adrianna Geronilla
Alicia Reyes
Charlita Russell
Juan Empig
Catherine Gantz
Graciela Cobian
Esperanza Rosas
tWoody Grindle
Danny Hermiz (Wed]
Ramon Rivera
Raquel Rivera
Modesta Lozoya
Christobal Sanchez
Maria Sanchez
Lee Hodge
Lorna Hol berg
Rosa Hungerford
Maria C. Lopez
Maria Parker
Linda Jackson
*Bill Kr ieger
*Maria Durant
*Norma Herrera
Joyce Lopez
Reyna Rodriguez
Aurora Andrade
Maria Burgos
Wai Ling Driesenga
Bernada Valencia
Ana MacFarland
Mary MacGillis
Phoebe McGuane
Paul Mansell
Trini Mendez
Bertha Torres
SEvette Martinez
Unassigned
Elvia Chavez
Shirley Meyer
5Maria Minke
Unassigned
Lilia Salas
Kevin Minke
Page 1 of 2
--
-
.
--
ell
~,
What Are Training
Workshops?
Our training workshops offer specialized
training in the simple teaching techniques
developed by Dr. Frank C. Laubach. This
"Each One Teach One" program has been
successful for over 50 years. Workshops are
held several times a year in many of the
Laubach Literacy Centers located through-
out San Diego County. To find out when
and where the next one is being offered,
call: (619) 942-4945.
For those prospective tutors interested in
teaching English to Speakers of Other
Languages(ESOL), our certified Laubach
trainers hold 18-hour workshops. These
sessions are usually held on four successive
Saturdays, or two evenings (or mornings) a
\vt::'l'k for three weeks. All sessions must be
attended and a workshop fee of approxi-
mately $30 covers the cost of books and
materials as well as membership in various
Laubach organizations.
For those interested in teaching reading
and writing to English-speaking people, our
certified Laubach trainers hold 12-hour
Basic Literacy workshops. However, since
our focus in San Diego County is on teach-
ing the ESOL program, we do not offer these
training sessions as frequently. For those
strictly interested in Basic Literacy, we
encourage you to explore some of the other
literacy organizations in San Diego County.
For more informa tion on these, please call
1-800- 231-l1959.
I study English because I think it is important
for all people when they come to this country...
and when we live here... Laubach student
Who Are Our Students?
Most of our students are foreign-born
people of all ages, from various walks of life
and educational backgrounds. These variables
often determine the length of time a student
stays with the program and the degree of
success that he or she attains. Some students
are English-speaking adults who wish to
improve their reading and writing skills.
I'm retired, but I'm still doing something I
feel is worthwhile that helps other people...
Laubach t'ftor
How Do I Begin!
To become a tutor, to find out the dates
of our next tutor-training workshops and to
learn the location of your nearest Laubach
tutoring center, please call our San Diego
Laubach Literacy headquarters at (619) 942-
4945. If we have no center in your area, and
you are interested in finding out how to
start one, call the same number.
We have centers in the following areas:
Alpine
Carls bad
Chula Vista
Encinitas
Escondida
Fallbrook
La Jolla
Lakeside
Lemon Grove
Mira Mesa
Pacific Beach
PatTero
Poway
Ramona
Rancho Bernardo
San Diego
San Marcos
Solana Beach
Valley Center
Vista
Now, more than
ever, we need
your help.
~ O~f:,@
~f:,~C
uO~~
f:,~CP
Volunteer
today to teach
people how to read,
write and speak
English.
[Clllh<t,h I ilpri1cv Council (If "(In Oil, _-'auntv, In,
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COMMUNITY DEVElOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
FUNDING APPLICATION FOR 1993-94
NOTE: THIS APPLICATION IS DUE NO LATER THAN MARCH 1, 1993 AT 5 P.M. AT THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT. 276 FOURTH AVE.. CHULA VISTA.
Program/Project Name: Project Hand
Name of Organization: Lutheran Social Services of Southern California
Contact Person: Scott Jenkins
Title: Area Director
Address:
Telephone:
1.
Amount of Funding Requested
$ _20.000_
2.
Amount of 1992-93 CDBG Funding:
$ _14,000
3. If this is an existing program, how many years has it served Chula Vista
residents? 15 years
4.
Is this program physically located in Chula Vista?
_yes_
5. Describe the main goal(sl. objectives and activities of your organization:
Lutheran Social Services of Southern California (LSS) dedicates itself to
upholding human dignity, promoting and establishing justice, affirming
equality and resisting complacency along with, in behalf of and among those
whose lives have been severely limited by their own actions and/or the
actions of others.
LSS responds to the needs of people regardless of race, religion, gender or
creed through the development and maintenance of a range of services
which:
1. improve the quality of life for people with limited options;
2. Promote mental, physical and spiritual healing;
3. Encourage human growth and development and
4. Provide continuums of care for those in need.
For 45 years LSS has provided diverse services to those in need, including
emergency assistance, prison visitor centers, shelter programs, various
programs for women and children, immigration and refugee assistance,
counseling, employment assistance and others.
2
6. Describe the specific program for which funds are requested: (If you are
only requesting funds for general organizational support, go to question
#10).
Project Hand provides a variety of emergency assistance for our indigent and
sometimes homeless clients. We offer emergency food and clothes, shelter
referrals, transportation funds for medical appointments and job search,
vouchers for prescriptions and utility assistance. All of these services are
offered under the framework of a case management system. This system
helps individuals and families achieve self-sufficiency through
comprehensive, goal-oriented action.
7. Why is this program needed in Chula Vista?
Project Hand has a fifteen-year history in Chula Vista, and during that time
the community has been able to depend on Project Hand for emergency
services. We have always been able to provide food to clients, and we are
the only program in Chula Vista that provides shelter vouchers for St.
Vincent de Paul.
The recession in San Diego County has exacerbated depression--like
conditions for many residents of Chula Vista. Local unemployment rates
continue to grow and job opportunities continue to shrink. Project Hand has
fulfilled the need for emergency food for many residents who are suffering
from a crippled local economy. Rohr and other firms send the newly
unemployed to Project Hand on a regular basis.
We have been successful in assisting our clients during the past 15 years
and plan to continue to do so in 1993 and 1994.
8. Who will be providing the services? Briefly describe qualifications of key
staff and indicate their level of education/training.
Our caseworker, Bonnie Jerome-Edmonds, has been employed at Project
Hand for more than 2 years. Her resume is attached.
9. Program Budget (Include only those expenses directly related to providing
your specific program):
Total: $41,258
3
COBG
$
Other Funds
$
Salaries/Benefits
20,000
5,123
Rent/utilities
-0-
-0-
Equipment/Supplies
2,623
other: Maintenance
600
other: Insurance
480
Other: Travel/conferences
516
other: Temporary employees
775
Other: Client services (program grant)
6,000
other: Interest expense
3,208
Administrative fee (10%)
1.933
Subtotals
20,000
21,258
10. Specify exactly how the COSG funds will be used:
They will be applied toward the caseworker's salary/benefits expense.
11. Please list the name and amount of other secured or potential sources of
funding for this specific program:
Thrift Shop
Individual gifts
Local congregations
Las Primeras
CECa
MAZON
Food for All
SOG&E Contrib Club
$ 5,758
3,000
3,000
2,000
2,500
2,500
2,000
500
21,258
12. Do you anticipate needing COSG funding for this program in subsequent
years?
Yes
x
No
If yes, how much funding will be needed each year?
1994-95 $ $18,000
1995-96 $16,000
$1996-97 $14,000
4
13. Who will be served by your program or organization and what are the
boundaries of your service area?
Almost all clients fall into the "very low income" category and include
mostly families. Some are homeless and more than half are children.
Approximately 45% of our clients live in Chula Vista, and the rest are
basically from surrounding South Bay communities.
14. How do people find out about your program? How do you do outreach?
Referral by various organizations, local congregations and word of mouth.
We publish our services in local directories and use a wide network of
congregations and other organizations to publicize our services.
15. Do you assist clients to get to your program site or provide services out in
the community?
No. Our insurance does not allow us to provide these services.
16a. Total # of clients served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94 _7000_(est}
1992-93 _7000 _(est)
1991-92 6604
16b. # of Chula Vista residents served or to be served in:
1993-94 _3500 (est)
1992-93 2853
1991-92 2892
16c. # of low-income clients served or to be served in:
(Low-income is defined as follows: 1 person = $23,150;
2persons = $26,450; 3persons = $29,750; 4persons = $33,050)
1993-94 7000
1992-93 7000
1991-92 6604
17. What methods will you use to account for the income level and other
demographic information on your clients?
We obtain verifiable documents from employers, unemployment records and
general welfare records. We require clients to have a picture ID before we
provide services.
_~fI
~
Lutheran Social Services of Southern California
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
PROJECT HAND EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE CENTER
580 Hilltop Drive
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Telephone (619) 425-4061
Located at the corner of Hilltop and I Streets in Chula Vista on the grounds of St.
Mark's Lutheran Church.
Hours:
Monday through Friday, 9 A.M. to Noon and 2 to 4:30 P.M.
Staff
Bonnie Jerome-Edmonds, Coordinator
Approximately ten people (mostly from local congregations) who
provide a range of services, including answering phones, pantry
work, pickup and delivery, minor repairs and initial client intake.
Volunteers
Include food, shelter referrals, emergency clothing, funds for
transportation to employment interviews or doctor appointments,
prescription vouchers anq ,assistance with utility bills.
Services
All clients fill out an application and are interviewed by a
caseworker. Together they develop a case plan which includes
identifying the problem, steps to resolve the problem and a timeline
for carrying out the plan. The case plan is designed to result in
greater self-sufficiency for the client.
Casework
Sample of 1992 Statistics:
Total unduplicated clients
Number of clients receiving
- funds for transportation
- clothing
- shelter
- number of shelter nights
- food assistance
- number of meals provided
6,626
845
849
404
6,210
7,095
61,004
3101 Fourth Avenue, San Diego, CA 92103 . (619) 291-8722 . FAX (619) 291-8724
LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
BOARD OF DIRECTORS 1993
J. Roger Anderson, Bishop, Southern California (West) Synod, ELCA
Loren T. Kramer, President, Pacific Southwest District, LCMS
Robert L. Miller, Bishop, Pacifica Synod, ELCA
Nancy Jackson, Chair
V. V. Motley, Vice Chair
Arthur Tomlinson, Treasurer
Janice Harmon, Secretary
John Donovan, At Large
Gwen Bergh
Ronald Carlson
Howard Christensen
Gene Dahlgren
Kenneth Eggers
Ted Hartman
Sheila James
Patrick Jow
Henry Kiehn
Raymond Le Blanc
Melissa Salomon
IU<NIE JffiC."lE -EU-filDS
PROFESSICNAL EXPFR:IEN:E
UNITED STATES CENSUS BUHEAU, San D~CA.
Recrui1::lnent Manager
Full responsibility for the recruitment and testing of applicants to fill District
Office positions. Developed and maintained good public relations wi~~ community and
government agencies to promote cooperation and generate support for recruiting
efforts. Trained and supervised 15 office clerks responsible for recruiting and
testing potential candidates. Applied the Bureau's Equal Employment Opportunity (EEX))
progranl principles and monitored the minority reporting system. Established a reserve
of available qualified job candidates to compensate employee turnover.
INDlAN HUMAN RESorJF.CE c:.rnTER, INC., San Di?jo, CA
Job Developer
Designed and implemented an effective system of outreach, development, referral and
placement of participants into unsubsidized employment. Provided participants with
Employability Development Plans, counseling, referrals and supportive services as
needed. Prepared accurate statistical and performance reports reflecting pertinent
data acccrding to schedules and requirements of funding sources.
SAN DUro COUNTY ORGA.'U:mTlON OF PRlVA'l'E EDUCATION, San Diego, CA
Job Placement Specialist
Designing and conducting job search assistance classes, developing employment
opportunities, with emphasis in the electronic field, coordinating job interviews,
composing resumes, and writing, implementing; and supervising on the job training
ccntracts.
SAN DIEX;O COUNTY PROBATION DEPARTHTh"T, San Diego, California
k'n:bation Offioer
Care, custody and control of junvenile offenders being detained in Juvenile Hall for
pre-hearing and pre-placement time periods. Supervising detainees during daily
activities, meals, school movements, recreation periods, hospital emergencies and
regular medical care. Extensive report writing.
INDIAN HlJI.'AN RE80UHCE CENl}:R, INr:., San Die-,e, C~
Job Developer __
Interviewing clients, couns~ng referrals to appropriate job openings,
vocational counseling services, 01 additional vocational training. Haintaining job
and ski 11 banks, attending workshops and conducting job development trai ning
sessions. Developing on-going contracts \'iith the business community.
Hll.'!;'EPIN COUNTY PUBLIC DEFENDER'S OFFICE, Hlnneapolis, HN
Dispositional Advisor __
Provided comprehensive, ccur~ial and advocacy services to juveniles and
adults charged with felonies misdemeanors or ordillilllce violations. Duties performed
were Court-related Advocacy, Needs Assessment/Referrals, Resource Evaluation and
Community Resource Liaison. In addition, prepared all reports and correspondence
relating to these activities.
E1XX7ITlCl< :
B. A. Social Work, CUm Laude, Augsburg College, Minneapolis, Hinnesota
A.. A. North Hennepin Community College, Osseo, Minnesota
LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
PROJECT HAND
CURRENT SOURCES OF INCOME
ELCA Hunger grant
Las primeras
CnBG Chula vista
CECO
MAZON
Food for All
Thrift Shop
Individuals and congregations
$ 1,500
2,000
14,000
2,500
2,500
2,000
7,700
7.400
TOTAL
$39,600
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
F1JNDING APPLICATION FOR 1993-94
NOTE: THIS APPLICATION IS DUE NO LATER THAN MARCH I, 1993 AT 5
P.M. AT THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT, 276 FOURTH AVE., CHULA VISTA.
Program/Project Name:
Emergency Food Program
Name of Organization:
MAAC Project
Contact Person: Roger Cazares
Title
Executive Director
Address: _
Telephone
I. Amount of Funding Requested:
$
10,000.00
2. Amount of 1992-93 CDBG Fundin&:
$
-0-
3. IT this is an existing program, how many
years has it served Chula Vista residents?
27
years
4. Is this program physically located in Chula Vista?
yes
5. Describe the main goal(s), objectives, and activities of your organization:
The goal of the Metropolitan Area Advisory Committee i's to improve
the ability of low-income residents in the South Bay to be self
sufficient and to improve the quality of life. To achieve this
goal, one of MAAC's primary objectives is to operate an integrated
social services delivery system, which provides a wide variety of
services aimed at meeting the needs of disadvantaged, low-income
reside~ts in the South Bay area.
MAAC presently operates a Service Center at 1671 Albany Avenue in
Chula Vista. The Service Center's location has been a integral
part in which MAAC has the ability to serve and meet the needs of
Chula Vista's low-income communities.
The types of services offered are: crisis intervention,
welfare/SSl advocacy, emergency energy assistance, weatherization
for homes, tax/renters credit, housing referrals, counseling,
senior lunch program and emergcy food.
All the services mentioned above are part of a case management
system.
6. Describe the specific program for which funds are requested: (If you are only
requesting funds for general organizational support, go to question # 10),
The COSG funds will be specifically utilized to purchase
food, infant formula and diapers. This direct aid will
be provided through the Chula Vista Otay Service Center.
Individuals requesting emergency food will be screened by
experienced staff and the client will be linked to other
services to enhance their opportunities towards sel f
sufficiency.
7. Why is this program needed in Chula Vista?:
The MAAC otay Service Center has a dire need to increase
the amount of food required to meet the demands put upon
us during this economic crisis which is affecting the
community.
8. Who will be providing the services? Brien)' describe qualifications of key
staff and indicate their level of education/training:
MAAC staff will be providing the services of emergency
food. All staff have the experience and training on how
to screen and process cl ients through case management
services. The majority of the staff have been employed by
the agency over six years.
9. Program Budget: Total: $ 10,000.00
(Include only those expenses directly related to the program for which funding is
requested).
CDBG
OTHER FUNDS
Salaries/Benefits:
$
$
Rent/Utilities:
Equipment/Supplies:
Other Purchase
food
10,000.
Other
Other
Subtotals:
$
10,000.
$
10. Specify exactly how the CDBG funds will be used:
The CDBG funds will be specifically utilized to purchase
food, infant formula and diapers. This direct aid will
be provided through the Chula Vista Otay Service Center.
II. Please list the name and amount of other secured or potential sources of
funding for this specific program:
a. San Diego County Employee Contrib Organization -
Request submitted for funds - $5,000.00
b. FEMA supplemental emergency food
c. San Diego Food Bank
12. Do you anticipate needing CDBG funding for this program in subsequent
years? Yes x No
If yes, how much funding will be needed each year?
1994-95 $ 10 000 1995-96 $ 10.000 1996-97 $ 10,000
13. Who will be served by your program and what are the boundaries of your
service area?
City of Chula Vista's low-income residents
14. How do people find out about your program? How do you do outreach?
MAAC Project is an established and well knownfhr-oughout
the south Bay area for the past 27 years. MAAC is also
a member the the South Bay Service Providers through the
City of Chula Vista. Outreach is accomplished by
distribution of flyers, presentations and word of mouth.
15. Do you assist clients to get to your program site or provide services out in the
community?
Transportation services are provided to Senior Citizens
only.
16. For this specific program for which CDBG is requested, estimate the total
number of:
a. Total clients served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94
1992-93
1991-92
5,000
4,600
4.200
b. Chula Vista residents served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94
1992-93
1991-92
1,800
1,600
1.400
c. Low-income clients served or estimated to be served in:
(low-income household is defined as follows: 1 person = $23.150; 2person = $26,450;
3person =$29,750; 4person =$33,050)
1993-94
1992-93
1991-92
1,ROO
1,600
1,400
17. What methods will you use to account for the income level and other
demographic information on your clients?
HAAC Pro ject uti I i zes the Federal .Poverty Income Tabl e to
determine eligiblity of all clients. Demographic data is
coli ected on all clients through the intake process.
This statistical information is reported monthly to the
administrative office of the agency.
PLEASE ATTACH THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
a) A PROGRAM BROCHURE OR FLYER (if you bave one)
b) A CURRENT LIST OF YOUR BOARD OF DffiECTORS (ODe page)
c) A COMPLETE LIST OF CURRENT SOURCES OF REVENUE (one page)
A,
DE~:.cr~ IPT I Uhl
N~
I NCCIME
CUI.H'HY [-'UI-l(llNC;
CITY FUNDINCi
ST ATE f'1.Ii'H.lI NC,
HEAD:3TAI<T rUNLJINO
sue,:.',r:_ FUND! NO
IRCA FUhIDINO
CLlnn I" Le.::
UNITED ClAY FUNDING
OTHD< I NC011[
I N'-K I NO INCOME
TO-' AI. I NCOM~
E XPLNS<.S
PEh:~';f.Il\jtH;:l
SALArn L~: AND v.JAC.E~~
ANNUAL. LEAVE
f BJN(if! L;CNEFITS
TOTAL PEFlSONNEL EXPENSES
N(_'tl"r-EH~,:rjNNLL
AUHHn SIF,AlIVE Df't:NSE
CONSUL T AN1'S
?,TUDCNT 2,'[ I PEND?;
IT<AVEL ens TS
SPACF nEr.nAI
Jf.lHTORIAL AND MAINTENANCE
r,C-hIO'/A / J Ul'l~,:
TELEPHONE EXPENSES
lITILITIC-:
DUPl.ICATION COSTS
COtl:,IU1i',bLL ::~,I.JPPL II:..:S
PHrJORI\I"l MA Tt.R 1 ALS:
[1!1..11 r'I'Il~-NT 1~r:I'i'l AI
t:.:UU (PMENT PURCHA::;E
EClUIf'MI;-IJT M""ll'HUMNCr::
1 hl:~;UI ~ANCE ANti BOND 1 NG
FfJOII FXF'[:I'J'_-..l:~
AnVERl"rSING
PBOC;r-i:AM ::':11['='[;'0["'1 E XPENSt:
ECl)f\lOMIC AS:31STANCE
DEI-I,FOAl lOti EXPENSE
INTE.HE:::.T EXPENSE
Mell'U lUf..:} t.jf', H::.F~~;
OJT f(UM[)IJW,[HENT'"
':;IIPf"orn I'.'t: ~El,\' '/(-'1:::._;
AD!';' AND F'R(II::ES~:: 1 NO n::E.S
IN-l<IND EXr'F:N'3E
MJ. :.:.(:EL I.Af'II~\'1I..l'.:: AND 01 HEr..:
TOTAL NON-PEHSONNEL
TU'( Al. ~:X["CN:.E:,:;
TOT AL UNA['='f-'LL ~':D FUNDS
cu iEN1
THIS YEAk 'i'.
::;(I(;.:~(J.18
4'5167. :35
204 (lTl. 64
::4e9~!5.47
34047.16
40:::3.15
~'45. 44-
9746.55-
210t:::.85. T;.'
512.963.00
1300637.68
310055.44
. (It)
82:)57.66
39:<413.10
4e-,9'i~. 78
103231.55
.00
9535.89
~7816.45
522.4.24
61411.::::7--
4005.90
4c.99.'50
1095.34
17126.14
2~5:::1. 00
1830. ;:::9
.00
2)7.89
14:::::::'':',.12
187i:l.57
278.40
2.':"tl~. 71
20086.59
18c.e.l). 3~
345.3/;.
11~4~j. 18
~,40.(l1)
.I)U
4t~.lll.l
512963. (II)
1~,3:::1.82
805186.7;:'
119'7601.8;"
10:::035.8,';.
PER I 0 [J
IjUDGi::.T I.
.00
. (ll)
.I)(l
. (.II)
. (H)
.(10
.00
.00
.00
. (1(1
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
.00
. (ll)
.(10
.00
.00
. (II)
.(l0
.00
. (1(1
. (It)
.00
.00
.00
.1)(,
.00
.,)1)
.00
.00
.00
.1)0
.00
YE~R 10
f\ll:;. YI::./\k 'f.
C. 1 771)4.43
11';',1:,>:'/':.-1.(17
'''1:,744(:..99
2(,.::":,('11:.. 4'~,
6':,t:",'j:::l4.(I'S"J
1 ':' ~:~':;'~/. '!'5
8--:.4168.90
'7.:.'':,/':'1). (,:::
927455.8'1
512'''1':.:3.(,0
791B8~3.6t>
S7t1l890.09
.00
808103.92
4589994. 01
~71077. 43
364011.26
.0(1
124851.34
3.217::9.9'"
7970::.15
7237.8c.
71380.99
4.s~,85. 87
8713.4~
~1)187:::.8:j
24'J:~::::(1. c.7
~::.,,::: 1. ,:.(1
"3::::.:.2.:"/.I/J
1~,,;: 1 ::::. 19
7:;':::;.::; 1 . 1 ,~.
64::'1~.:'. ';:./
:'7:::7.1/
>A"'c'.12
::; :;'::o...~::,o. ~:::
:::_;:'''':>,'.i.9~
'~:~":" ~;
,;.~.:::,'~...,. 42
4":.':':::. (,()
1~4(1. ~"l
6<_".;,,'':.. ')14
~,t 2';':~, :;':. ()()
::: 1 ~~ _:: ';1 . ~: /
cB4'"n.l0
;'<:4,;",:.;.7.11
~;~4;:. 4~-
r. 2 , v " ;! " ~ " '" :!' "- ~ r, ~ ~ 0 ~ -l
- c:. - ~ "- 0. - " 0. ~ "- - "-
"2 ~ n " ~ " Cl. "- 0. 0; n "- " c:. ~
, , ~ g ~ e:. = - - ~ -:;.'
r. ~ " fi ~ "- ?- 2- "- 5 3 " ~ < ... ~ !"") - " "" ~ "
r. ~ -Q ~. ~ ~ ~ - , ~ 9
~ - .:< :i oe Q. ~ - '3 0; <
"- - !"") 5 ~ -g 5' ;=:" '" ~ " :J ~ <
" n C So ~ oe " r.
~ .;;; [, = !"") ~ 0. 5 r. ;;- .. e:. ?? ~ ;r ~ :; "- ::;:"
- ~ ~ - " ~ -g S. ~ " < S " ;:: " .:< c
" , " .::; Q < e:. " - " 0. cr. r ~
r. ~ ~ =- , = g "5 n ~ ~ .:< e:. '< g , :; ~ [ ~ ... ~ ~
n 0. = , 0 <: 0. = 0; ... 0. =
< < "" <: "5 o' , ,
e:. " 5 ~ s 5 ~ ~ " ~ 0 r. " , "
~ r. ~ = " ;;- - !"") e:.
= - 0. " " 5 .. 0 O?, :!' ~ "
"- 0. n S " " n I"l ~, , " ~ ~ ? ~ <: , , " "
s 5 " = " ~ 5 ~ r. c:. ~. 0. '< 'JJ c:. ~, ~ i " <
:; , Co "" = !C -< - il 3 2' ~ !"") ~ - :; S. r. n
0. " " 5 r 5' ~ a :. 5 = .. " f; ~.
5 ~ " " < "
"5 ~ e:. " oe 5' ~ 6 -' 0. - <F- e:. =- " ;:;. '7 ~ '" e:. n
~ oi< 0. 0. -' ;:: :; " ::;:. "
, c:. 5 ;; n ,,' - " !i ~ g- o. " 5
5- - " " , ~ .,.. " e:. - :; " '" . - " ~ " =
- <: " , 3 3 " @ cr. n 3 " >- e:. e:. "
:! , ~ f: ~
~ r ~ = " ~ . ~ n e:. e:. >- ~ < ~
~ 0. " or " ~ 0. ". 5' , " < "
!' e:. oe i3 ~ 7" <r- ~ !"") ~ g <r-
- 5 t ~ :;
-Q 0. n < ~ " <: ~
" n ;;::" 5' ~ :; r,' .:< " ;:: .;; .? '" s
e:. , ~ , , " " " "" 5 , " 2- " " "-
~ " c ;; ~ - g- "" 5 ~ c ~ "" .. € >- ~ 5
" " ~ "" ~ " e:. "- e:. 3
? c:. ;;- = - -' , " Q oe "" C C ~ - = >- "- < =- ,
'" " " -i? = '< < < " .:< ;::" :;
, "- =- - > c:. ~ ;. " I"l r g <r- Oo n S n ~
" ~ " ?- n = ~ , ~ =-
e:. g " " e:. ;;- " = ~ - ~
<: " '7 ~ 5 " = , 5 4' - <
~ :; " , - " ~ '7 " .. " ~ - - " s, ~ ~
'< ~ , ~ 5 ;::" ;:;. " ~ -l <r- - =- " :;
, - ~ !!. ~ " " " -5 -l ~
~ , ~ ~ ~ "" ~ ~ -= " "- ~ oe -
<: ~ z - - "" >- , -= s
" e:. , n , ~ ~ " 0. 0. :: , Z' ;;: ]
" " " " 0. ~ ~ - I"l - ~ - i}" " .' [ "
'" , 0. " ~ - "" "- , "
" <: " < :; :. = ;: " < 6 , ;I> -
oi< ~ ;::" < ~. ~ oe = Q " 3 g "- oe "-
~ " c:. 3 ", ~ ~ ~
r. " 0. " ~ " '" r, " = = :; 0. n '" e:.
" " :; ~ " " " ;:. ;; " " '=' [ e:. "
~ " 5 " " s =- 3 "
e:. c. ~ e:. " , <r- , .. ~ , ~ ". ~ cr. '< , ~ s "
MAAC Project Humon Services Education Services Pal. Center Health Services
Administration & Training Division Division Mission San Antonio de Pala Division
P.O. Box 28
Administration 1627 Hoover Avenue Pala, CA 92059 Drinking Driver Program
Persoonel Department 1607 Hoover Avenue National Ci~CA 91950 (619) 742.1201
fiscal Dopartm.nt National City. CA 91950 (619) 474.3 45 Third Avenue. Room 103
140 W. 16th Street (619) 474- 7~76 Fax 1/;19) 474.3998 San Marcos Center Chu]a Vista. CA 9]9]0
National City. CA 91950 Training Center (619) 439-5014 (Nonh County) 1283 San Marcos Boulevard (619) 425-917\
(619)474-2232 San Marcos. CA 92069 Fax (619)425-1812
Fax (619)474-5035 1625 Hoover A venue Head Start Division (619) 744.2110
National City. CA 91950
(619) 474-9474 Administration Pauma Valin Center Casa de MilaJros
National Cih Crnler 503 Vista Bella. Suite 1 ]6600-8 Hwy 76 1127 South 38th Street
Oceanside. CA 92057 San Die~o. CA 92] 0:2
Energy Services 1609 Hoo\ler-A\lenue 1619'4)9.5606 Pauma Valley. CA 92061
National Ci',?, CA 91950 Fax 1619'439.3267 (619) 74:2-2000 (619)262-4002
DivisIOn (619) 474-7 76
Ot.ay Center Ocunside Center Nosotros
L1HEAP/ECIP 503 Vista Bella. Suite 4
1615 Hoo\ler A venue 1671 Albany Avenue' Oceanside. CA 92057 Community Services 3 North Se'cond Ave
Chula Vista. CA 91911 16191721.0584 Chula Vista, CA 9]910
National City. CA 91950 (619) 422-9236 Vista Center Division (619) 42t>-4801
(619) 474-8737 (South Countyl
(6]9) 588-4323 (East County) San Ysidro Center 157 Lado de Lorna Drive North Counly Cenlro
Vista. CA 92083 Tobacco Education &
268 W. Park. Avenue' 16191726-4131 1500 E. VallC'y Parkway
WeatheriZlltion San Ysidro. CA 92073 Suite' "H" A wareness Program
161 5 Hoo\ler A venue (619)428-1 ]39 Fallbrook Cenler Escondido. CA 92027 4~ Third Avenue. Suile ]01
National City. CA 91950 County Welfare Department 405 W. Fallbrook Street (619) 746-3920 Chu]a Vista. CA 9]910
Fa]]brook. CA 92028 Fax (619)746-]286
(6]9) 263-9700 (619)585-511] (619)713-4]88 (619)425-9171
'"
o
('")
;;:>
...:::
"'c:
m...
;::l.,
<7'
--0
('")c:
~;::l
>""
Cl~
mm
Z
('")
-<
','-
3:
>
>
,n
~: ~
~. ""0 ;
I' ~ ~
Ls
m
n
....,
-
f
~
~
L
5)
MMC PROJECT
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ERNESTO AZHOCAR - CHAIRPERSON
MANUEL R. CAMACHO. VICE CHAIRPERSON
DOLORES ADAME. SECRETARY
EDWARD NICHOLAS. TREASURER
1)
Anehony Ven..gas
Stadium r.chnician
6)
Edward "ichola.
High School Coach
"eeional Ciey, 92050
2)
7) Viceor R.....nd..z
tiiiiiiiIiIIiii Elem.
.onita, CA '2002
Ern...eo Azhocar
IlfPACT Direceor
3)
Dolore. Adam..
iiiIiiIiiIiIi
San rsidro, CA '2073
I)
Vista, CA '20'3
4)
Delfin Labao
Reeired
9) Annie Arroyo
ra. Complianc.. Officer
Emplo ..ne Develop.
R. Camacho
usical Director
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
FUNDING APPLICATION FOR 1993-94
{,
HAR 1993
RE'Cei'lp.c1
Commur.ity Deve'opment
Dep3rt.'!lent
NOTE: THIS APPLICATION IS DUE NO LATER THAN MARCH 1,1993 AT 5
P.M. AT THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT, 276 FOURTH AVE., CHULA VISTA.
Program/Project Name: NOSOTROS
Name of Organization: MAAC Project
Maritza Garcia
Contact Person: Warren Garcia Stewart
Health Services Division
Division Director
Title----.fi:.ol.!ram Manal!:er
Address: __
Telephone
1. Amount of Funding Requested:
$ 20,000.00
2. Amount of 1992-93 CDBG Funding:
$
o
3. If this is an existing program, how many
years has it served Chula Vista residents?
I
years
4. Is this program physically located in Chula Vista?
Yes
5. Describe the main goal(s), objectives, and activities of your organization:
GOALS: To provide education, counseling and service referrals
to members of the Community who might otherwise be excluded
due to reasons of financial or physical deficiencies.
OBJECTIVES: Implementation of an outreach program directed
at the Chula Vista residents (Seniors, low income and/or
disabled) who are experiencing severe alcohol and drug abuse
problems personally or with extended family members.
ACTIVITIES: An Outreach Specialist would organize and design
activities to include continued contact with area churches,
other social service agencies, social gatherings and area
community events. Information about available recovery services
would be distributed to clergy, social workers, physicians,
teachers and neighborhood organizations.
6. Describe the specific program for which funds are requested: (If you are only
requesting funds for general organizational support, go to question It 10).
NOSOTROS currently maintains an Alcohol Recovery Home in Chula Vista and desires
to establish a staff position for an Outreach Specialist to provide information to
to the Community regarding Prevention Education, Assessment and Referral concerning
alcohol and drug abuse.
7. Why is this program needed in Chula Vista'?:
Alcohol and other drug abuse crosses all lines. Our experience shows that many
members of the community could benefit by a greater exposure to education, coun-
seling and referral opportunities. Currently and over the years MAAC has
received numerous calls from individuals, schools and community groups requesting
informational presentations concerning the affects of alcohol and arug use/abuse.
Staff shortage prevents MAAC from actively participating; however, on a limited
basis MAAC can provide these services. The continuing string of calls is
evidence that the Chula Vista needs are present and not being met.
8. Who wiII be providing the services? Briefly describe qualifications of key
staff and indicate their level of edueation/training:
1. Maritza Garcia, Division Director, Health Services Division, MAAC Project -
Maritza Garcia has 19 years of experience in the alcohol and drug delivery
system. In addition to her direct services experience, she is chiefly
responsible for the development of San Diego's only culturally-specific
recovery home for Latinas with alcohol and drug problems and for South Bay's
only culturally specific recovery home for Latinos with alcohol and drug problems
which is located in Chula Vista.
2. Warren Garcia Stewart, Program Manager, NOSOTROS Recovery Home, MAAC Project-
Nine years'experience working in the-field of Alcohol Recovery.
9. I'nlgn\lR Budget: Total: $ 20,000.(Xf
(Include only those expenses directly related to the program for which funding is
requested).
Salaries/Benefi ts:
CDBG
$ 16,000.00
OTHER FUNDS
$
Rent/Utilities:
Equipment/Supplies:
4,000.00 (visual aids, handouts, and mailings.
Other
Other
Other
Subtotals:
$ 20,000.00
$
10. Specify exactly how the CDBC funds will be used:
A. One full time employee (Outreach Specialist) with annual
salary of $16,000.00 including benefits.
B. Literature/Handouts - Annual expenditure of $4,000.00.
11. Please list the name and amount of other secured or potential sources of
funding for this specific program:
The site of NOSOTROS is currently funded for residential services
through County Alcohol Services ($101,000), receipts for resident
fees and private donations. An Outreach Specialist would be
able to use available office space at this facility.
12. Do you anticipate needing CDBC funding for this program in subsequent
years? Yes X No
If yes, how much funding will be needed each year'!
1994-95 $ 17,000.00 1995-96 $ 14,000.00 1996-97 $ 10,000.00
13. Who will be served by your program and what are the boundaries of your
service area?
The target groups would be senior citizens, low income families
and the disabled. Many people fall into all three categories
at once. MAAC Project currently operates an extensive program
from its Social Services Center from its office in Chula Vista.
Accommodating a cross training in awareness raising within this
population will be a natural smooth flowing sequence for which
MAAC is properly equipped and experienced.
14. How do people find out about your program? How do you do outreach?
Due to the minimum staff in place at present, current
informational outreach is limited to networking when time allows.
A specific position for an Outreach Specialist would give us
an opportunity to establish a non-residential component to our
existing program.
15. Do you assist clients to get to your program site or provide se.-vices out in the
't ?
communi y. It is MAAC 's intention to provide these services in as large a variety
of places as possible. Our Nosotros residential facility on 2nd Avenue in Chula
Vista, our Health Services Division Administrative office located on 3rd Avenue
in Chula Vista and our Social Service Center located of of Main in Chula Vista
are all available to provide services on site. Additionally, MAAC will encourage
and is prepared to provide services at any other location from which requests
or needs are identified (Le., private homes, churches, schools, etc.) and has
a 12 passenger van to assist in transportation.
16. For this specific program for which CDBG is requested, estimate the total
number of:
a. Total clients served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94 3,000
1992-93---1iLA
1991-92 N/A
b. Chula Vista residents served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94 2,500
1992-93-N/A
1991-92 N.'A
c. Low-income clients served or estimated to be served in:
(low-income household is defined as follows: I person =$23, 150; 2person=$26,450;
3person=$29,750; 4person=$33,050)
1993-94 2,500 +
1992-93 NtA
1991-92 NtA
17. What methods will you use to account for the income level and other
demographic information on your clients?
At every initial interaction a questionnaire will be
completed by each participants denoting income range,age,
address, occupation, etc. Also at every initial interaction
en assessment to determine immediate need will take place.
Extensive networking capabilities afford MAAC the opportunity
to effectuate an effective referral to other community agencies.
PLEASE ATTACH THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
a) A PROGRAM BROCHURE OR FLYER (if you have one)
b) A CURRENT LIST OF YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS (one page)
c) A COMPLETE LIST OF CURRENT SOURCES OF REVENUE (one page)
Attachment A
Administration
4S Third Avenue
Olula Visla. CA 91910
(619) 425-9171
Fox (610) 425-1812
Nosotros offers
residents:
· Group InvQlvement
....",..., .............,.
· Alcohol Education
· Individual Involvement
.. ..............
· Recreational Activities
· In-house AA Meetings
· Supportive and Drug-Free
Nosotros
3 North Second Ave., Bldg. B
Chula Vista, CA 91910
(619) 426-4801
. MAAC Project
Health Services Division
A C2~p~~tnt of
MA~,g:gRQ'ECT
A MULTI-PURPOSE
SOCIAL SERVICES AGENCY
c,
,
c,
o
c,
c
,
,
C
C,
c,
C;' ::l
,
o
~ c
o
r. rJ~
o
If':;
r, ." "~ ~ ~_?
~ - ~
~ r;
~ r; .... ~
"
"
"
~. ;
5
[ :J
~
,
5-
~t"
~
:;. I -
r. ~
rj; 1f :f
~ r~
.:; rs r:
C- 0
MAAC Project
Administration
Penmnncll)ep:'lrlllll'nl
Fisc:al Department
I-IOW,161hSln:l'l
National ('it)', CA \)jl))()
101Y) -l7-l 2232
"'ax (nll))-n..t.<;03S
Energy Services
DiviSIOn
L1HEAP/ECIP
1615 Hoover Avenue
National City, CA 91950
(619) 47-l-8737 (South County)
(619) 588-4323 (East County)
Weatherization
1615 Hoover Avenue
National City. CA 91950
(619) 2flJ-\)700
I
I
L
~ ~
::!
~
,
~
;=; -;:-'
~
C
r,
~
::... ;=:
r~
'r:.
~
c;
~ '7 c..
g ;!;!:-
3" .... 0 ';
::l ,-.,;;:;
.7 '-'
:::J S. -: ::l
S liQ R;:t
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
- ;. ::2" =
,,_ _=: 1"'
~ ~ ,;; ~
o
g- ~ "3
'r::;
i
~ :?
.
.... r~
:;
'?
r 2.
r.
- "
"
;:;. ;
E::. -::J '<
r,
s- ()
_. _ =- r..
~ ~."" cr,;;
rn~;:;&g~
=
Human Services
& Training Division
r\dmilli~lraljon
rhO] HUllver Avenue
N;llional ('it...., ("A {JII)50
(hllJ) 47-1-7576
Training Center
1625 Hoovcr ^ venue
N.ltional City, CA 91950
(0IlJ}-l.74.9474
National City Center
100l) Hoover Avenue
National City, CA 91950
(014) 474-7570
Otay Center
1071 Alhany Avenue
Chula Vista CA 91911
(6]9) 422-9236
San Ysidro Center
268 W. Park Avenue
San Ysic.Jro, CA 92073
(619) 428-] 13l)
County Welrare Department
(619) 585.5111
~
c.
3
c
~
~
c-
or.
'J; -
2 ~
i'
g -
5' ;s: -
~ c
"
o
r,
c,
=
~
~
Q, -
c,
c
.
'< "'0
F
~
,
'?
~ c..
:r. 7-
r, ~.
~ ::; ';. '?
~ c< ;(- - :J
!. ~ :J 3 :J _ Q J [
C' ,;;::;: c. Co. :J ;:;. 7 ~
~~:;.> r;;~~ :J
.7 ~ ~]
:; 3:: ,r;' ~ 'f
g. > 2: (3' 3
g ~ '< 2
c;
c-
5
~ .5
~
~
c,
'~ ./
s~
~ ,-
ri2
c
r-i~
,
o
-
~
- 'r~ ....
F
C,
r.
o
c
r;
" -
:t :;
o
:? -
---J r~
~ -0-5~
;;... ;;; ~ r. ::: ~ S. --::l _
-< 'J; !;. f. 9 ~:;
00::: "'3>;::;~';;
~~~,~[:~~~g~
"
~
"
"
"
'?
,
~
~
Education Services
Division
Pala Ll!"nter
Mission San Antonio de Pala
P.O. Hm 28
l'ala,CA 92059
(611J)N2120]
1(127 I h.ovcr ,\\'Cllll~'
National Cily, CA (11)sn
(619) 474-'v)%
rilX (619) 47..k\9IJX
(619) 4)9.5014 (North ("nunty)
San Marcos Center
1283 S;Hl Marcos Boulevard
San Marcos, CA 92069
(6]9)744-2110
Head Start Division
Administration
503 Vista Bella, Suite I
Ck:eanside, CA 92057
(61l)) 439-5606
Fax (619) 439-3267
Oceanside Center
503 Vista Bella, Suite 4
Oceanside, CA 92057
((19) 721-0584
Vista Center
157 Lado de Lorna Drive
Vistil, C ^ 92083
(6]9)726-4]31
Fallbrook Center
405 W. Fallhrook Street
Fallbrook, CA 92()2~
(619) 723-418H
Pauma Valley Center
[0600-B Hwy 76
Pauma Val]ey. CA 92061
C(14) 742-2<XlO
Community Services
Division
North County Centro
]500 E. Valley Parkway
Suite "H"
Escondido_ ('A 92027
(619) 746-3920
Fax (619) 746-1286
r,~
3
~
ci
"
~ ~
"-.
,.., r,~
c"
;:: -;
C
./
,
"
~ ,~
"
::::: -
~
o
r,~
;..- ~
~ - r-;" c. ;:.
" g' : ~
:7-g~
:;. rtl
7
.
F
-,
o
::. rtl c:::l
g- r. ,~
e-
E. [ ~
:; ?
~ g rg
f~ i' ~
,
'5
~
o
'"
7"
"
3 <
:/J 8.. Co:
5 ~ ~
Health Services
Division
I)rillkin~ I)rin'r Prn~ram
-J.5 Third Avenuc. Rool11 ]03
Chula Vista, CA 91910
(0[1)) 4::'5-9171
FilX (619)425-1812
Casa de Milagros
1127 South 381h Slreet
Siln Diego,CA 92102
(619) 262-4002
Nosotros
3 North Second Ave.
Chula Vista, C\ 91910
(6]9)426-480]
Tobacco Education &
A wareness Program
45 Third Avenue, Suite 101
Chub.! Vista. CA 919]0
(619(425,9171
<r>
o
n
->
~?::
<r>C
"'.-
::0..,
<7'
--0
ne
"'::0
<r>-o
>0
C'l<r>
"''''
Z
()
-<
~
L>
L~L
L~
os:g n
--1
Attachment B
MMC PROJECT
ROGER CAZARES, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ERNESTO AZHOCAR - CHAIRPERSON
MANUEL R. CAMACHO - VICE CHAIRPERSON
DOLORES ADAME - SECRETARY
EDWARD NICHOLAS - TREASURER
Anthony Venegas
Stadium Technician
.- -
Chula Vista, CA 92010
6) Edward Nicholas
........Ch
National City, 92050
1)
6/77
2)
Ernesto Azhocar
IMPACT Director
7) Victor Resendez
Principal, Penn Elem.
3)
8)
San Ysidro, CA 9
.....
Vista, CA 92083
4)
Delfin Labao
Retired
050
9) Annie Arroyo
Tax Compliance Officer
iiiIiiiiiIiiiIi Dept.
Vista CA 92083
N4t~on4 ~ty,
---
5) Manuel R. Camacho
Teatro Musical Director
Attachment C
NOSOTROS ALCOHOL RECOVERY HOME
CURRENT SOURCES OF REVENUE
Annual Funding by County Alcohol Services - $101,000.00
Resident fees - $28,000.00 Annual Estimate. ($300.00/mo)
Private Donations - 5,000
Fund Raisers and HAAC Corp. contributions: 10,000
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
FUNDING APPLICATION FOR 1993-94
NOTE: THIS APPliCATION IS DUE NO lATER THAN MARCH I, 1993 AT 5
P.M. AT THE CITY OF CHUlA VISTA, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT, 276 FOURTH A VB., CHUlA VISTA.
Program/Project Name: Senior Nutrition Center - Chula Vista
Name of Organization: Th" Sa] vat] on Army
Contact Person:
Bill Molina
Title Administrator
Address:
Center: 648 Third Ave., Chula Vista, Telephone
CA 91910
1. Amount of Funding Requested:
$ 22,000
2. Amount of 1992-93 CDBG Funding:
$
o
3. If this is an existing program, how many
years has it served ChuIa Vista residents?
16 years
4. Is this program physically located in ChuIa Vista?
Yes
5. Describe the main goal(s), objectives, anda'ctivities of your organization:
A. To serve seniors 60 years old and older in need.
B. l.
2.
3.
to prevent their unnecessary institutionalization;
to reduce their isolation and loneliness; and
to improve their nutrition and health.
C. On-going activities to impact the seniors in need are as follows:
*home-delivered meals
*congregate meals
*exercise class
*transportation assistance
*health education; infor-
mation, speakers, etc.
*Social worker available for case
for clothing, groceries, etc.
*available to assist on other needs
*recreation activities
*support groups
*socializing programs
*group outings
*how to budget
*participation in Senior Alert
management and/or crises intervention
6. Describe the specific program for which funds are requested: (If you are only
requesting funds for general organizational support, go to question # 10).
Funding is needed to purchase a IS-passenger van for the transportation pro-
gram. This program is to pick up seniors who are either limited in mobility
and/or whose funds are limited and/or who live in an area where bus service
is not accessible for them to walk to the bus stop. The van would be used
to bring and return seniors to the nutrition center. Trips will be provided
for shopping, doctors appointments,and other necessary trips for needy
seniors of limited resources. The van would be used to deliver meals to
home-bound seniors.
7. Why is this program needed in Chula Vista?:
There are many seniors in the community who need this transportation. Their
ability to access services at the center is important to alleviate some of
their needs.
8. Who will be providing the services? Briefly describe qualifications of key
staff and indicate their level of education/training:
Delaine Drake is the director of the Senior Nutrition Center. She has a
bachelor's degree in Human Behavior and has experience working with seniors
in hospitals.
9. Program Budget : Total: $ 195,820
(Include only those expenses directly related to the program for which funding is
requested).
CDBG OTHER FUNDS
Salaries/Benefits: $ $ 55,550
Rent/Utilities: 16,000
Equipment/Supplies: 4,000
Other Food & other cost 85,394
Other Vehicle 22,000 0
Other Indirect 12,876
Subtotals: $ 22,000 $ 173,820
10. Specify exactly how the CnBG funds will be used:
To purchase a IS-passenger van for transporting seniors.
II. Please list the name and amount of other secured or potential sources of
funding for this specific program:
(a) Area Agency on Aging-have been on request list for vehicle for
two years.
(b) Cal-Trans-looking into the possibility.
(c) Looking into any other sources that are available.
12. Do you anticipate needing CDBG funding for this program in subsequent
years? Yes No X
If yes, how much funding will be needed each year?
1994-95 $ 0 1995-96 $ 0 1996-97 $ 0
13. Who will be served by your program and what are the boundaries of your
service area?
The boundaries of our service area is the City of Chula Vista. Only
seniors are assisted.
14. How do people find out about your program? How do you do outreach?
Word of mouth has been the most effective way of letting seniors know about
the program. Seniors telling other seniors. Fliers are placed in mobile.
home parks, apartment buildings, and wash houses bulletin boards.
15. Do you assist clients to get to your program site or provide services out in the
community?
Yes. With this request for a IS-passenger van it will enable the program
on a reliable basis bring clients to the program site and return safely
back home.
16. For this specific program for which CDBG is requested, estimate the total
number of:
a. Total clients served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94 500
1992-93 485
1991-92 478
b. Chula Vista residents served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94 500
1992-93 485
1991-92 478
c. Low-income clients served or estimated to be served in:
(low-income household is defined as follows: 1 person =$23, 150; 2person=$26,450;
3person=$29,750; 4person=$33,050)
1993-94 425
1992-93 413
1991-92 405
17. What methods will you use to account for the income level and other
demographic information on your clients?
The only eligibility fo~ the p~ogram is that the pe~son be 60 or older.
The p~ogram is required to complete an application on each program
participant. The questions of income l~vel and source as well as add~ess
is part of the application. The Chula Vista seniors on the whole are
low income that a~e on the program.
PLEASE ATTACH THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
a) A PROGRAM BROCHURE OR FLYER (if you have one)
b) A CURRENT LIST OF YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS (one page)
c) A COMPLETE LIST OF CURRENT SOURCES OF REVENUE (one page)
1993
LIST OF CURRENT SOURCES OF REVENUE
Area Agency on Aging Contract, County of San Diego
Program Fees (limited to request of donation by contract)
The Salvation Army (limited to contributions given)
Site Manager Fund Raisers
ROSTER
THE SALVATION F"Rl1Y
SAN DIEGO CENTRAL ADVISORY BOARD
1993
MEMBER
TERM
ADDRESS
ZIP
PHONE
OFFICERS
CHAIRMAN
HUNSAKER, Barbara 95 92010
Chief of Staff to Sen. Wadie Oeddah 92021
VICE-CHAIRMAN --
HESTON, Elsie 93 92067
Homemaker
VICE-CHAIRMAN
SULLIVAN, Leo 95 92101
Attorney - Sullivan Cummins 92106
Wertz McDade & Wallace
TREASURER
HOLST, David 95 92112
1st VP, San Diego Trust & Savings 92129
SECRETARY
FINCH, Ron 93 -- 92106 --
------.. ----~-------~_.
MEMBERS
ALLIS, Irene 93
92037
ALMGREN, Jeanette 95 92037
Homemaker
ANDERSON, GayJ.e F. 93 92127 -.
Attorney, Hinchy, Witte, Wood,. 92037
Anderson & Hodges
BATESON, Marion 95 --- 92037
Investor
BLAKE, Gloria 93 92067
Homemaker
BLAKE, Joe E. 95 92067
R.etired Banker
BREMNERr Paul 95 92111 ~
C.F.O. , Chandler PaCkaging, Inc. 92122
] /2)/9',
CIRUZZI, Vincent R.
Pres., Analytical Bus. Solutions
CLAY, Mrs. Ben G. (Nikki)
Sr.VP, Public Affairs
Stoorza Ziegaus & Metzger, Inc.
DeBRONNER, Mary
Consultant, Travel Center
EVANS, Gary L.
Pres., La Jolla Bank
FADEM, Dr. Robert
M.D.
FRELS, Harry D.
Sec., Kiwanis Club of S.D.
GIBBS, Hi1.1i.am
Aircraft Service
GILL, David
Judge, Superior Court
'iOODRICH, Nancy E.
Asst. Chief, S. D. Police Dept.
GOSLIN, Finley H.
Retired
HAROLD, Michael. J.
Broker, Coldwell Banker
HOLIAN, RADM Francis Ie.
Commander, Naval Base San Diego
ROM, Dorothy
Partner, Tom Horn & Associates
HUBBARD, Betty (Mrs. Leon R.)
Chmn., L.R. Hubbard Construction
JENSEN, Robert o.
Director, Corporate Taxes
HomeFed Bank
JONES, Napoleon A., Jr.
'ldge, Superior Court
KEATING, Edward
Ret:i red
95
93
93
94
94
95
94
93
94
94
95
93
94
95
94
94
94
- 2 -
037
083
084
132
i16
L02
i16
L21
J19
l12
l28
)37
101
067
=-
101
103
LOl
L16
)37
.30
WIll.
...
...
t37
03
10
09
23
37
12
03
-
WIll.
Dl
24
FAX
..
--
-
...
LORDr Dorothy
Ownerr The Brass Baron
94
MARTENr William H.
Retiredr U.S.N.
94
MILLER, Morgan 93
Sr.VP, Great American First Savings
MJNROE, He1en
Development & Training
95
NEELY, Richard
Assistant District Attorney
93
PADEREWSKI, C. J. (Pat)
Retired Architect
93
PEARSON, James H.
Pres., Colonial Ford
93
PORTER, Dr. Ha1ter J.
Dean, Continuing Education Center
93
RIVEPAr Dr. John
95
SMITH, Pam
Dist. Mgr., Social Security
94
WEINSTOCK, Louis
95
If:INFREE, Daniel
Attorney
94
WOLF, He~ene C. 95
lnt'l. Finance, Deputy Tariff Spec.
u. S. Customs
ZEIGER, Vicki L. 93
Mgr.r Employee Programs & Benefits
SDG&E
- 3 -
12117
2056
2183
2106
!O25
:112
116
104
950
L06
LOS
.20
04
910
902
067
101
119
101
114
:112
:067
FAX
-
--
--
-
-
~
-
--.
-
.~
,
!
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
FUNDING APPLICATION FOR 1993-94
Llr:f."'::"~:,: "
NOTE: THIS APPLICATION IS DUE NO LATER THAN MARCH 1, 1993 AT 5
P.M. AT THE CIIT OF CHULA VISTA, COMMUNIIT DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT, 276 FOURTH A VB., CHULA VISTA.
Program/Project Name: SENIOR ADULT SERVICESfHEALS-ON-vIHEELS
Name of Organization: SENIOR ADULT SERVICES"__ INi:_.___
Contact Person: James Richards
Title Deve looment Director
Address:
-----
San Dieqo CA 92104 Telephone
1. Amount of Funding Requested: $ 15,000
2. Amount of 1992-93 CDBG Funding: $_~+~OJL
3. If this i~ an existing program, how many
years has it served Chula Vista residents? __J.R_years
4. Is this program physically located in Chula Vista?
Yes
S. Describe the main goal(s), objectives, and activities of your organization:
There are I in every cormnunity I considerable numbers of low-income
elderly men and women who are unable for various reasons to leave
their homes. They are unable to shop for food and to prepare
meals for themselves. Because of their circumstances, they are
often overlooked by those who can help them. This is the group
served by Heals-On-Wheels and Senior Adult Services.
Heals-On-Wheels delivers two meals/day, 5 days a week, including
special diets (Low sodium, bland, etc.) when required to low-income
elderly residents of Chula vistil. Meals-On-Wheels progrilm illso
pnJviclcs counsc]in~J services for individuals Clnd families, person,]l
I"()rl(~Y management, information and referral, ilnd various other
sCl-viccs to hel!) seniors remain in their own llomcs as long as
l'ossible.
6. Describe the specific program for which funds are requested: (If you are only
requesting funds for general organizational support, go to question # 10).
Meals-On-Wheels
7. Why is this program needed in Chula Vista?:
The elderly or disabled men and women taken care of by
Meals-an-Wheels are often overlooked in community planning.
Because of their circumstances, they have become isolated and not
able to express their needs nor can they actively seek out the help
they need. Meals-an-Wheels helps them in their own homes with food
and other services, enabling them to survive.
8. Who wiII be providing the services? Briefly describe qualifications of key
staff and indicate their level of education/training:
The MOW Program Services Director has an LCS\~ degree.
Coordinators - MSW
Counselors - MSW
All have had years of experience, mostly with Senior Adult
Services, Inc.
9. Program Budget: Total: $ 216,327
(Include only those expenses directly related to the program for which funding is
requested).
CDBG OTHER FUNDS
Salaries/Benefits: $ $ 74,747
Rcnt/Utilities: 3,060
Equipmcnt/Supplics: 16,500
Othcr Food/Packaging 15,000 100,541
Othcr Insurance:
Administration, etc 6,479
Othcr
Subtotals: $ 15,000 $ 201,327
10. Specify exactly how the CDBC funds will be used:
Two meals per day, 5 days - Monday-Friday - will be delivered
to low-income seniors or disabled persons living in the City
6f Chula Vista. Special diabetic, low-sodium, or bland diets
will be provided if required. Other services, including
counseling, daily money management, and information and
referral, will be available.
11. Please list the name and amount of other secured or potential sources of
funding for this specific program:
See attached sources of revenue
12. Do you anticipate needing CDBC funding for this program in subsequent
years? Yes X No
If yes, how much funding will be needed each year?
1994-95 $ 17 ,500 1995-96 $ 20,000 1996-97 $ 22,500
13. Who will be served by your program and what are the boundaries of your
service area?
City of Chula Vista will benefit by providing a valuable
community service at very little cost to taxpayers.
Low-income seniors and disabled who are unable to shop for
food or prepare adequate meals for themselves.
City of Chula Vista
14. How do people find out about your program? How do you do outreach?
Media stories and information
Word of mouth - volunteers and clients
Hospital social work staff
Church g:roups
Newsletter to donors
15. Do you assist clients to get to your program site or provide services out in the
community?
Services are provided at the clients' homes.
i
/
I
/
,
,
/
.i
16. 1'01. this specific program for which CDJ3G is requesled, eslimate the total
number of:
a. Total clients served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94 391
1992-93 372
1991-92 354
b. Chula Vista residents served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94 311
1992-93 295
1991-92 280
c. Low-income clients served or estimated to be served in:
(low-income household is defined as follows: Iperson =$23, 150; 2person =$26,450;
3person=$29,750; 4person=$33,050)
1993-94 298
1992-93 283
1991-92 268
17. Wbat methods will you use to account for the income level and other
demographic information on your clients?
In-depth interview with each client
PLEASE ATTACH THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
a) A PROGRAM BROCHURE OR FLYER (if you have one)
b) A CURRENT LIST OF YOUR BOARD OF DffiECTORS (one page)
c) A COl\1PLETE LIST OF CURRENT SOURCES OF REVENUE (one page)
senior Adult Services
2860 North Park Way, San Diego, CA 92104
BOARD OF TRUSTEES 1992 - 1993
OFFICERS
PRESIDENT
VICE PRES - RESOURCE DEV
~r. E. DOUilas Dawson
.IilIiiiia CA 92112-4103
*(93)
Mrs. R. Merl Ledford, Jr.
(Joy
tiiIIIIiIi' CA 92106
VICE PRES. - ADMINISTRATION
TREASURER
Miss Priscilla Simms
*(95)
Ms. Daralyne M. Baddour *(93)
CA 92110
San
VICE PRES. - MARKET./COMM.
SECRETARY
Mr. Richard Ledford
(93)
~ann
..-.CA 92118
VICE PRES. - PROGRAM
(94)
MEMBERS AT LARGE
(94)
Mrs. Clayton Brace
(Jeanne)
*(93)
.... CA 92104
~a Fe, CA 92067
(* Denotes second Term)
1
(94)
(94)
(94)
(94)
Mr. Albert Gabbs *(93) Dr. Peshel (93)
-. .
.....' CA 92103 3
Mr. Griffith Hayes (95) (95)
Mr. Arthur Herzman (95)
~2103
PROGRAM ADVISORY
COMMITTEE REPRESENTATIVES
(95) CENTRAL
~art
San D~ego, CA 92104
Mrs. victor H. Krulak (94)
San Diego, CA 92106 ~A 92020
*(94) NORTH CITY
~german
San Diego, C 122
~eur (95)
San Diego, CA 92109 SOUTH BAY
Marvin J. Mizeur ___tOkes
(94) Chula Vista, CA 91911
San CA 92109 NORTH COAST
~ern
(95) Vista, CA 9208
.... CA 92101
Mr. Ross Parmer (95)
2
SAN DIEGO DISTRICT PRESIDENT
UNITED METHODIST WOMEN
Noemi V. Prince
~1934
PRESIDENTS ADVISORY COUNCIL
Mrs. Michael Ibs Gonzalez
.....
San Diego, CA 92103
O'Donnell
CA 92120
Mrs. Dorothy Sumner
~2l03
~arp (Betty)
San Diego, CA 92106
...........UkOr
San Die 0
Rev#5jlO-92
COMMITTEE MEMBERS (NON-BOARD)
Mr. Dan GibbY.
..... CA 92120
Mrs. Roy Berry
~
Chula Vista CA 91911
-
STAFF
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR
Mr. James J. Richards
3
SOURCES OF REVENUE
DEW1BEP.J, 1991 13~3 BUD6ET
JAX m XAR APP.. MY JUXE JULY AUG SEPf OCT XOV arc
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
jOOCO!fTRle-INDIV 545,000 Ho,Dao 5105,000 U35,OOO $170,000 S190, 000 1210,000 S230, 000 S~60,000 '285,000 $315,000 m;o,ooo
110 CllNTiIB-CD/'IM. GROUFS 13,500 Hi,OOO 19,500 514,000 519,500 S2~,OOO $27,500 53J,OOO $35,500 140,000 S~5r 500 S56,OOO
120CONTRIB-ClilJRCHfS 12,500 13,700 $4,900 16,100 17,300 18,500 59,700 510,900 Ul,loa 113,"'00 Sl4,900 Sl8,400
300 SPECIAL EVElnS 10 $10,000 $12,500 122,500 $22,500 122,500 522,500 122,500 122,500 i22,500 1161,500 sn2,SOO
310 ADVISORY COnti. EVElHS 11,250' $2,500 $3,750 15,000 16,250 $7,500 58,750 Slo,oaD fll,150 512,500 SI3,750 115,000
700 liOARD or fiUIBAllllN. .0 '0 10 .0 .0 .'0 '0 .0 .0 '0 .0 $4,100
800 P~JVATE GRANTS H,OOO SII,500 SI],OOO S2~, ~oo S27,500 133,000 $36,000 $3'3,000 H!,SC1 $44,000 HS,500 HS,ooa
1000 CITY G~ANTS S3,OOO $6,500 $8,000 $11,500 113,500 SH,OOO Sl8,500 S19,500 120,000 $23,500 $24,01)1) S2&,OOO
1200 (ESAlE RICHES REVENUE S5,OOO SlO,OOO 115,000 120,000 $25,000 $30,000 $35,000 140,000 145,000 S50,OOO 155,000 S&O,OOO
'300ffEINCDI1EI1DW 566,943 $133,995 1200,B29 $''1.6],770 1334,713 HOI,&55 $469,5'39 1535,541 1&02,493 S669, 426 $73&, 2~9 $80:::,311
.300 fE':: I!~CDr.E C/C S2,"250 H,500 S6,750 is, 000 'll,2S0 $12,500 115,750 ue,coo S20,250 S22,500 $2(,750 S17,OOO
1310 SE~VJCE rEE ~ErU:i!l CS350) (!l00) W,OSO) "1,400) UI,750) ($2,100) "2,4:iOl (S2,500) (13,150) U3,SOOl ($],8:50) Hi,OOOI
1320 DAY rEE PAY?lfHTS 12,000 14,000 SE,OOO se,ooo 510,000 $12,000 $14,000 SI:;,COO 1 ~ s, COO $20,000 1n,eoo S24,OOO
J<OO COliaACTS ro~ SERVICE 12,178 H,356 SE,5J4 $8,712 110,890 $13,068 llS,N& '17,414 ~19,602 tl1,780 S23,95S ~ 26, 136
16C~ !I:\'[SrWH IIlCOIl[ '2,850 15,700 $7,350 HO,200 $12,050 $H,7UO $17, ~~O 120,400 122,050 124,900 127,750 S2~! 400
1610 HIDOIlr.E.'iT INT. lNCllli[ ~soo $1,&00 $2,400 ~3, 750 H,loe 14,950 IS, 11~0 S6,750 $7,6S0 18,&00 59,550 HO,SOO
I'JOO DO~OP. OEVEl[).o~~~T $20,000 ~W,OOO S'30,OOO Sl20,OOO 1150,000 $:30,000 SlIO,OOO $140,000 f170, ~Oll $200,000 S220,000 ':;:;0,%'0
1920 COIT..U;t: P~06J;:,\l1 IJ,66& 13,332 H,9'3'3 S6,(&~ SB,331 s~, "9B SI1,E;&5 '13,332 SH,'399 $1&,666 S1S,333 CO,OllO
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOIAlf:fVENU[ Sl72, ~S7 S33E,873 S~99,461 $&70,7'37 1932,lJ4 '977,272 51,J24,159 Sl,267,5H 1I,~19,7J4 SI,571,272 '1,865,009 17,046,247
-----.-------.--.-
,~ .
FEB lGS3
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
FUNDING APPLICATION FOR 1993-94
Re(;€1.tf~3d
Comm\1nity Devrlr.f'I!1'..nt
D~~::'Hh~(';:,
NOTE: THIS APPLICATION IS DUE NO lATER THAN MARCH 1,1993 A T 5
P.M. AT THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COMMUNITY DEVEWPMENT
DEPARTMENT, 276 FOURTH AVE., CHULA VISTA.
Program/Project Name: South Bay Familv YMCA PRYDE Proaram
Name of Organization: South Bay Family YMCA
Contact Person: Tina Williams
Title Executive Director
Address.
1. Amount of Funding Requested:
Telephon__
$ 36,727
$ 36,727
2. Amount of 1992-93 CDBG funding:
3. If this is an existing program, how many
years has it served Chula Vista residents?
4. Is this program physically located in Chula Vista?
~ years
Yes
5. Describe the main goal (s), objectives, and activities of your organization:
It is the goal of the South Bay Family YMCA to improve the quality of human life by
helping people realize their fullest potential through the development of the spirit,
mind and body. We offer a variety of programs for youths and adults that build
relationships, develop new skills, nurture self esteem, clarify values, promote per-
sonal growth, appreciate diversity, foster a greater sense of community and help
individuals become better leaders and supporters. During 1993 we will serve over
5,000 girls and boys in our various programs, including Summer Day Camp, Holiday
Camp, Spring Camp, School-age Childcare, Gymnastics, Movement Education,
Youth Fitness, Gym Ventures, Basketball, T-ball, Softball, Soccer, Tae Kwon Do, Y
Indian Guides and Open Book Reading.
6. Describe the specific program for which funds are requested: (If you are only
requesting funds for general organizational support. go to question # 10).
The YMCA PRYDE Program is an after-school outreach youth program which will
provide substance abuse and gang prevention curricula, as well as structured
recreational activities for 60-70 at-risk youth between the ages of 11-15 in Chula
Vista. The project has been operating in other parts of the County since 1989.
Please see attached for further information.
7. Why is this program needed in Chula Vista?:
There is currently a tremendous need for programming aimed at teenagers in our
community. There has been a marked increase in gang related incidents and
substance abuse by the youth.The District Crime report for Sweetwater Union High
School District shows that more than 74 chemical substance offenses occured
during the period January 1- June 30, 1991. According to Loren Tarentino, "gang
activity and substance abuse is increasing among our Junior High and High School
youth. The Juvenile Justice system is over burdened by the increase. The PRYDE
prQgram wil provide a positive alternative to the youth in our community.
8. Who will be providmg the services? Briefly describe qualifications of key staff
and indicate their level of education/training:
e YMCA Youth and Family Resources Director, a licensed Clinical Social Worker
with experience in child and family services.
eYMCA PRYDE Program Director, B.A. with experience directing five other
PRYDE programs throughout San Diego County.
eSite Manager, Bachelor level education with experience working with youth and
families.
eTwo Youth Leaders, with experience working with youth and families.
9. Program Budget: Total: $ 36.727
{Include only those expenses directly related to the program for which funding is
requested).
Salaries/Benefits:
CDBG
$ 27,877
360
2,283
2,598
560
250
2,799
$ 36,727
Rent/Utilities:
Equipment/Supplies:
Other TRnsportRtion
Other Printing
Other Training
Other Administrative
Subtotals:
OTHER FUNDS
$
$
o
Question #6 Continued
Service Approach
The goal of YMCA PRYDE is to promote and develop PRYDE in Self, PRYDE in
Family, PRYDE in the Community, and PRYDE in the Future. Youth are moved
through four levels of involvement over a 12 month period. A graduation ceremony
is held for youth who complete the fourth and final level of PRYDE. Graduates who
wish to continue in the program may act as a volunteer peer counselors. The
program's activities are highly supervised, (an adult/child ratio of 8 to 1), and de-
signed to educate as well as bond youth with the healthy lifestyle of the YMCA. The
program will be presented to Chula Vista youth through a collaborative approach
involving the YMCA, Boys & Girls Club, Parks & Recreation D6partment, Police
Department, Sweetwater High School District, Chula Vista Elementary School
District, and South Bay Community Services.
The curriculum for the PRYDE Program includes:
-"Alternatives to gang membership" (15 week curriculum)
-"Just Say I Know How" self-esteem enhancement curriculum
-"Turn It Around" substance abuse prevention curriculum
-Homework Assistance/Journal Writing
-Family intake visits and quarterly update meetings
-Community Service events and Field Trips
-Structured Recreation and Initiative Games
-Career Awareness Presentations and Guest Speakers
-Social Skills Training
-Leadership and Peer Counseling Training
TARGET POPULATION
YMCA PRYDE serves youth between the ages of 8-15, who are considered at risk
of involvement with substance abuse or gang activity. For the purposes of this
grant request, the target age is 11-15.
Number of Clients/Hours of Operation/Service Fees
60-70 Youth annually 60-70 Family Members annually
Three days a week from 3-5 pm and Saturday from 10-2pm.
The YMCA PRYDE Program offers its services to clients free of charge. Fee
waivers allow youth to participate in recreational activities at no cost.
KEY RESULTS
A follow up study conducted in 1992 with PRYDE youth graduates from two sites,
Jackie Robinson YMCA and Mission Valley YMCA branches, showed that six
months after completing the program, 100% had not participated in gang activities,
96% had not used drugs or alcohol, 100% had improved school performance, 96%
had improved interaction with their families, and 77% had continued participation
in healthy activities with their YMCA Branch or PRYDE.
10. Specify exactly how the CDBG funds will be used:
Funds will be used to provide gang and substance abuse prevention education and
recreation to youth in Chula Vista. Youth will participate in recreational activities at
the YMCA and local recreational sites on weekdays and Saturdays and also receive
prevention education at school, park and YMCA sites.
11. Please list the name and amount of other secured or potential sources of
funding for this specific program:
Current Support Fund Raising
United Way
$5,000
$5,000
12. Do you anticipate needing CDBG funding for this program in subsequent
years? Yes X No
If yes, how much funding will be needed each year?
1994-95 $ 26,727 1995-96 $ 16,727 1996-97 $ 6,727
13. Who will be served by your program or organization and what are the
boundaries of your service area.?
YMCA PRYDE serves youth between the ages of 8-15, who are considered to be
at risk of involvement with substance abuse or gang activitity. Participants will be
students who attend schools in Chula Vista. The particular school sites to be
targeted will be determined as expressed by school and law enforcement officials.
This collaborative venture will target youth ages 11-15 in areas that are traditionally
underserved.
14. How do people find out about your program? How do you do outreach?
Children are referred by school or publiC service officials, based on a variety of risk
factors: violent behavior, child or relative of a substance abuser or gang member,
victim of neglect or abuse, economically disadvantaged family ,latchkey youth, school
behavior problem, youth having experienced academic failure or potential school
drop out, youth or family involved with the Department of Social Services or foster
care. In addition, those participating in the program will refer children based on their
need to be enrolled in a positive program. Any child who wants to participate will have
the opportunity.
15. Do you assist clients to get to your program site or provide services out of the
community?
Transportation will be provided for the youth to participate in the program if they do
not live within walking distance of the program. YMCA vans or buses will be driven
by certified drivers.
16. For this specific program for which CDBC is requested, estimated the total
number of:
a. Total clients served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94 RO-70 Inll.'" BO_70 ,,,milv m..mhe,""
1992-93
1991-92
b. Chula Vista residents served or to be served in:
1993-94 60-70 lolus 60-70 family members}
1992-93
1991-92
c. Low income clients served or to be served in:
(low-income is defined as follows: Iperson=$23, 150; 2persons=$26,450;
3persons=$29,750; 4pcrsons=$33,050)
1993-94 60-70 (plus 60-70 family members)
1992-93
1991-92
17. What methods will you use to account for the income level and other
demographic information on your clients?
Upon registration into the program statistical information is collected and
stored in a computer data base. Referring parties will be trained in PRYDE
referral criteria. including our goal to serve low income youth and their
families.
PLEASE ATTACH THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
a) A PROGRAM BROCHURE OR FLYER (if you have one)
b) A CURRENT LIST OF YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS (one page)
c) A COMPLETE LIST OF CURRENT SOURCES OF REVENUE (one page)
Board of Management
1992 -1993
Larry Cunningham, Chair
Vice Chairs:
Pam Smith
Sandy Murphy
Susie Conners
Chuck Day
Mike Pradels
T. Par Cavanaugh,
Secrelary- Treasurer
Penny Allen, Past Chair
Members:
Vince Acosta
Ken Baumgartner
Mickie Beyer
Don Blind
Joanne Carson
JR. Chantengco
Norma Colunga
Melvin Cowherd
Greg Cox
Mary Lynn Deddeh
Ger; Dillingham
Rick Emerson
Mike Fmch
1J9 Fuller
aert Garcia
Ke~h Gentry
Fred Harder
Carl Harry
Bill Hauf
Robert Hlldt
Barbara Hunsaker
Ranie Hunter
Dick Kav
Rosemary Lane
Armando Mar1inez
Dan Mendez
Dave Michelson
Ken Monson
Peter Moore
KatllY Parker
Ken Sereelon
Art Sellgren
John Shockley Jr , MoO
Bruce Sloan
Palncia Smith
Dr John Vugnn I
Rle Williams 1
Brad Wilson
Tina Williams, Executive Director t
Heritage Club I
Penny & Dav~ Allen t-.
5 & Sandy Chase
.Iiam Cheverton
~1"1 & Midge Cowherd
;)ally trickson
DClug & Barbara Fuller
,~
[\r.'1 Sjm
~\itrlcla Smith
South Bay F3lT'1iiy YMCA
50 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
(619) 422-8354 FAX (619) 422-4412
"~------~-----
YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION
. STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENSES
FOR
July Iq9~- :June /'f'f3
YMCA OF SAN DIEGO
SOUTH BAY
REPORTING UNIT NO. 'Ie
DESCRIPTION
ANNUAL
BUDGET
e,GG4
85,000
19,500
25,300
15,050 I
ONTRIBUTIONS-UNRESTRICTED
URRE'NT SUPPORT
PECIAL EVENTS (NET)
ONTRACT REVENUE.'
EMBERSHIP DUES
ROGRAM FEES
PECIAL INTEREST-REVENUE
ERCHANDISE SALES
INVESTMENT INCOME
UBSIDY ALLOCATION
OTAL BRANCH REVENUE
657,643
1,225
1.000
74,426
882,008
-------------------------------
ALARIES & WAGES
.MPLOYEE BENEFITS
AYROLL TAXES
ONTRACT SERVICE
UPPLIES
ELEPHONE
OSTAGE & SHIPPING
ENT/CARE OF BLDG./INSURANCE
TILlTIES
RIN1ING EXPENSE
RANSPORTATION
ONFE'RENCES & TRAINING
UBSCRIPTIONS & REF MATL
DVERTISING & PROMOTION
ATIONAL DUiOS
PECIAL INTEREST EXPENSl
QUIPMENT
I SCELLMiECHJS--EXPENSF
ENERAL OFFICE SUPPORT
-0 TAr- alVINcH EXP}NS-t
N ~ T 0 UTe 0 M E
192,745
--'-'---'---'---',
29,238 I
23.143 :
5,5S0
41, 766
4,OT6
5,310
64,711
3,836
9 ;-ooo-j
20,867 I
- ----^ 8~6 ~. 0 1
1 ,405
3,-9'00
8,838
364,86S
16,267
11,165
67,336
82,2,ooe.
Mission Statement
"The South Bay Family YMCA is dedicated to improving the quality of human life and to helprllg all people'
rea/ize their fullest potential as children of God through development of the spird, nllnd and hOllV "
PRYDE in Self
Youth participate in recreational. edu-
cational and substance abuse/gang pre-
vention octivities six days a week. Trans-
portation is provided to YMCA branches
and city park sites.
The YMCA PRYDE program serves high-
risk youth ages 8- 15 referred by schools.
social service agencies. police. proba-
tion and park recreation personnel. The
aim of the PRYDE Program is to utilize
successful strategies for the prevention
or early intervention of substance abuse
and gong involvement. The program
moves youth through four levels of
involvement. each level lasts three
months and promotes:
PRYDE in Self
PRYDE in Family
Fomilies ond youth participation in the
program develops positive family inter-
action and communication through
shared activities.
YMCA PRYDE promotes a "Safe Home
Pledge- to serve os a vehicle for all fami-
lies in San Diego County to commit to 0
drug-free home. The pledge reads:
. We pledge to live a healthy life style
. We pledge to keep our home free of
drugs and crime
. We pledge to expand our heolthy
home to a drug-free community
For more information on
o
.
PRYDE in the Future
Youth attend field trips and presenta-
tions to develop interest in positive ca-
reer choices as viable options to drug
and gang involvement.
PRYDE in Community
contact
Border View YMCA
3025 Beyer Blvd. Suite 103
San Diego. CA 92154
(619) 428-1168
Copley Family YMCA
3901 Landis Street
San Diego. CA 92105
(619) 280-2812
Jackie Robinson YMCA
151 North 45th Street
San Diego. CA 92102
(619)264-0144
Mission Valley YMCA
5505 friars Road
San Diego.CA 92110
(619) 298-3576
Palomar YMCA
1050 North Broadway
Escondido. CA 92026
(619) 745-7490
PRYDE in Community
Youth participate in community service
projects including graffiti control. multi-
cultural events and environment/recy-
cling projects.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
FUNDING APPLICATION FOR 1993-94
I
FEB 199.1
::2 Received
\;~ Community Dellelopment
\:'\ Departmeot
NOTE: THIS APPLICATION IS DUE NO LATER THAN MAR~_,I, ,~\
1993 AT 5:00 P.M. AT THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COMMUNify'
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, 276 FOURTH AVE., CHULA VISTA
Program/Project Name: South Bay Family YMCA Sunshine Co. Childcare
Start up cost for new childcare site at Gtay Elementary School.
Name of Organization: South Bay Family YMCA
Contact Person: Alberta (Peaches) Hartung
Title: Childcare Director
Address:
Telephone:___
1.
Amount of Funding Requested:
$ 8833.00
2. Amount of 1992-93 CDBG Funding:
$ 0
3.
If this is an existing program, how many
years has it served Chula Vista residents?
N/A
years
4.
Is this program physically located in Chula Vista?
Yes
5. Describe the main goal(s), objectives, and activities of your
organization:
In 1993 the South Bay Family YMCA will touch the lives of 5000+
children providing a variety of enrichment activities that compliment the
needs and interest of children which include Childcare, Camps, Gymnastics,
Youth Sports, and Literary Programs. Children learn new skills while they
receive guidance and challenge from positive role models with whom they
can identify and share their triumphs. The overall YMCA Mission is to
develop the inner strength of the children and their families by increasing
self-confidence, feelings of self-worth and recognition, appreciation of the
child's own uniqueness and motivating them to grow toward their full
potential. Families entrust us with the care of their children because of the
YMCA'S reputation of high standards and sincere concern for the welfare of
our youth and their future.
6. Describe the specific program
(If you are only requesting funds
support, go to question #10).
for which funds are requested:
for general organizational
The Sunshine Company is a state-licensed, national YMCA childcare
program. The program provides for youth when there may be no adult
supervision available in the home. We provide children a relaxed, non-
pressured atmosphere so they may learn and have fun. Our activities
encourage physical fitness and include sports, arts & crafts, quiet games,
homework help, and nutritional snacks, all designed to accommodate the
low-income and varied parental structures commonplace today. Our staff
are carefully selected to ensure that our children receive the highest
possible commitment of quality care, supervision and guidance that our
families deserve for their most precious possessionntheir children. Our
vision encompasses not just the needs of the individual child, but also the
family and community. Our programs are built with the entire family in
mind.
7. Why is the program needed in Chula Vista?
The program is needed In Chula Vista to provide a well structured,
supervised childcare program to those children who would otherwise be
left home alone. At this very impressionable age many children may be
inclined or lured into street play, gangs, defacing property through graffiti,
and drugs.
Our goal is to achieve a better lifestyle for all our youths by opening
an additional childcare center to families in those neighborhoods where
predominantly low income, minority, disadvantaged and single parents
reside. The present enrollment at Otay Elementary School is 653 students,
87% of whom are minority and 63% receive free or reduced lunches,
indicating low-income based upon Chula Vista City School District statistics.
Our effort is to provide childcare for low-income working families and
families currently receiving public assistance who are taking vocational or
skill-improvement classes to aid employability.
8. Who will be providing the
qualifications of key staff and
ed uca tion!tra i ni ng:
services?
indicate
Briefly describe
their level of
The South Bay Family YMCA Childcare Program is directed by Mrs.
Alberta (Peaches) Hartung, each school site is headed by a Site Supervisor
who is assisted by several Teachers! Aides. Some site personnel also serve
as van or bus drivers.
Mrs. Hartung's qualifications include a degree in Child Development
and fourteen years of childcare supervisory experience. The Site
Supervisors and Teachers must be at least 21 and have completed twelve
college units in one of the following curricula: Early Childhood Education,
Child Development, or Physical Education/Recreation appropriate to school
age children. Site Supervisors are required to have taken a college class in
Administration as well.
All childcare staff meet State of California Community Childcare
Licensing requirements, passed fingerprint and criminal clearance, and
medically sound according to State Health regulations. Site employees
must be certified in CPR and First Aid techniques. Also, childcare workers
are required to attend regular in-service staff training sessions. Each site
conducts periodic fire & earthquake safety drills. and staff are advised
regarding use of extinguishers and related safety equipment & procedures.
Bus/Van Drivers are trained, examined and licensed by the California
Highway Patrol and State Department of Motor Vehicles. Each site is
operated by sufficient personnel to ensure maximum ratio of twelve
children per adult worker.
9. Program Budget: Total: $ 8883.00 (start-up program cost)
(Include only those expenses directly related to the program for which
funding is requested).
Salaries/Benefits:
CDBG
$ 0
OTHER FUNDS
$ 0
Rent/Utilities:
Equi pment/S uppl ies:
Furniture:
$ 4695.00
Sports Equipment:
$ 654.00
Indoor Play Equipment:
$ 2370.00
AI1s & Crafts:
$ 906.00
Teacher Resources/Misc.
$ 258.00
Total:
$ 8883.00
$ 0
10. Specify exactly how the CORG funds will be used:
The CDBG funds will be used to open a new Sunshine Company
Childcare Site at Otay Elementary School.
Specifically, awarded funds would be used for start-up equipment
and furnishings including tables, chairs, cabinets, bookshelves,
refridgerator, and vacuum. The funding would also be used for books,
record player, records, games, sporting goods, first aid kits, craft & science
projects, and teacher resource materials.
11. Please list the name and amount
potential sources of funding for this
of other secured or
specific program:
none
12. 00 you anticipate needing CORG funding for this program in
subsequent years?
Yes
No
x
If Yes, how much funding will be needed each year?
1994-95 $ 0
1995-96 $
o
1996-97 $~
Funding request IS for start-up cost.
13. Who will be served by your program and what are the
boundaries of your service area?
The primary recipients of our service are the children of families
where adult supervision is limited by parents' need to work or attend
classes. Our program is designed to serve boys and girls of all ethnic
origins and religious affiliations, in kindergarten through the sixth grade
who attend Otay Elementary School.
14. How do people find out about your program?
do outreach?
How do you
0111' clientele learn of 0111' services by previous partIcIpants,
advertising, word of mouth, YMCA transfers, walk-ins, and also by
referrals from schools, Childcare Resource Services, Social Service Agencies,
GAIN, and Family Stress Centers.
15. Do you assist clients to get to your program site or provide
services out in the community?
Yes. The childcare site will be located on Otay Elementary School
grounds. Also, we use the Chula Vista School District under the
Transportation Latchkey Coalition (TLC) to provide transportation to our
childcare sites depending on space availability.
16. For this specific program for which CDBG is requested,
estimate the total number of
a. Total clients served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94 28
1992-93 24
1991-92 N/A
b. Chula Vista residents served or estimated to be served
in:
1993-94 28
1992-93 24
1991-92 N/A
c. Low - i n com e clients served or estimated to be served in:
(low-income household is defined as follows: 1person=$23,150
2person=$26,450; 3person=29,750; 4person=$33,050)
1993-94 28
1992-93 24
1991-92 N/A
17. What methods will you use to account for the income level
and other demographic information on your clients?
The Chula Vista City School District has furnished the present
statistics being used. The income level will be determined by the most
cun'ent HUD income limits for the San Diego SMSA. Residency and income
will be verified from the current Income Tax return or the previous
month's payroll information.
PLEASE ATTACH THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
a) A PROGRAM BROCHURE OR FLYER (if you have one)
b) A CURRENT LIST OF YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS (one page)
c) A COMPLETE LIST OF CURRENT SOURCES OF REVENUE (one
page)
..~~BAY.~A_, ",'T"'he'.,""~,,,... .,:', '
,4,f;t~~I\II~~~~..~~:'~~t~~,~scunom'ShR"inan""""'eJ;~>'',", ,
. "~','iiI!""~t' . , '0,," .'".. 'n'- . ..., "Jo-~,;~ ",.;.,...,," '\~~.L~'~~flr:,:,~,;\'~~~1if\~"'-#i'~<~~ .~~ ';*','~'\~
. :;\:~{:"" "~"A'j'''.'''';'~'':>;J1I'''':)'~''''l,?,B".~.~~J0:i'~~~''':~~~AilE~tft'.t~~rt1cA"li;;.v'
.'~.';l';'~r~.~:'~.c"7.~:1~~'~~~f~~:'~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~.~i,~~F!~~~1;:1.4~~:'
\:f~~~~.;t;;-"~?~~;{~1llliri~~Wi~te~~~illii~~~ij~..::~;\..
f'~-" :..t"-\J~i( ~.,:~ ,~~tf#l-~ ;~,. ,<::~,~,i~~.....~:1~~.~fr~~~4~_'~!JL~~~.'~;f,~~,~;~~~'!f::~~(~\.~~y~~{-:~~~.-; "-,-.
,..>~:,,~ :::::~'r~~,>.~ '~\;~~:~'<_";--:~'.'< ';"; :v:.'~,:'. ;.: 7;, ,:,y~--:"",:";~;;:~;:':'1J,~,r:;~';;;~';~:T(t~{';'.};~/~_-': :'<:,"::::'.'~':;';'. .~,i."I:'~_~":U'~:{ , ,: ',;.
.
-'.',.
,~' '.
,
, ,~ .
*Quality Unique Childcare
*State Licensed.
*Qualified Staff'
*Special Family Events
*Financiai' Assistance
*DayCamps are Offered during
School Breaks & Some Holidays
JREGJrSTEJRN(())W
J1 JlmJi it<e crll ' S]p) ~l(e<e
Supported, in part, by
II)
UnltedWay/CHAD
Campaign
YMCA Office Hours Are:
Monday Friday 8:00am 7:00pm
Saturday 9:00am 1 :OOpm
Sf Habla Espana!
All Registrations Taken At:
South Bay Family YMCA
50 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Childcare Direct~r:
Alberta (Peaches) Hartung
For More Information Call: 422-8354
,~
South Bay Family YMCA
50 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
(619) 422-8354 FAX (619) 422-4412
YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION
. STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPEHSES
FOR
July Iq'l~ - 1w\e I" "3
DESCRIPTfOI\l
Board of Management
1992.1993
Larry Cunningham. Chair
V~e Chairs:
Pam Smith
Sandy Murphy
Susie Conners
Chuck Day
Mike Pradels
T. Pat Cavanaugh,
Secrelary- Treasurer
Penny Allen, Past Chair
Members:
Vince Acosta
Ken Baumgartner
Mdie Beyer
Don Blind
Joanne Carson
J R Chantengco
Norma Colunga
Melvin Cowherd
Greg Cox
Mary Lynn Deddeh
Geri Dillingham
Rick Emerson
Mike Finch
noug Fuller
Jert Garcia
^enh Gentry
Fred Harder
Carl Harry
Bill Haul
Robert Hlldt
Barbara Hunsaker
Ranie Hunter
Dick Kau
Rosemary Lane
Armando Martinez
Dan Mendez
Dave Michelson
Ken Monson
Peler Moore
Kathy Parker
Ken Screeton
Art Sellgren
John Shockley Jr, M.D
Bruce Sloan
PatriCia Smith
Dr. John Vugrin
Rlc Williams
Brad Wilson
Tina Williams, Executive Director
Heritage Club
Penny & David Allen
roris & Sandy Chase
iam Cheverton
Mel & Midge Cowherd
Patty Erickson
Ooug & Rarbara Fuller
f),'!l Sun
~'alnClil Snllth
CONTRIBUTIONS-UNRESTRICTED
CURRENT SUPPORT
PECIAL EVENTS (NET)
ONTRACT REVENUE~~~
EMBERSHIP DUES
ROGRAM FEES
PECIAL INTERESri,REVENUE
ERCHANDISE SALES.'
INVESTMENT INCOME
UBSIDY ALLOCATION
OTAl BRANCH REVENUE
-------------------------------
ALAR I ES & IJAGES
MPLOYEE BENEFITS
AYROLL TAXES
ONTRACT SERVICE
UPPLIES
ELEPHONE
OSTAGE & SHIPPING
ENT/CARE OF BLDG./INSURANCE
TILITIES
RIN1ING EXP-ENSE ------
RANSPORTATION
ONFERE'NCES & TRAINING-
UBSCRIPTIONS & REF MATL
DVERTISI~G & P~OMOTIO~
ATIONAL DUE:S
PECIAL INTERESf-EXPENSE
QUIPMENT
I SCELLiHrEOU-S' EXPENSE
ENERAL OFFICE SUPPORT
OTAL BRANCR EXPENSE
N ~ T 0 UTe 0 M E
l~-
YMCA OF SAN DIEGO
SOUTH BAY
REPORTING UNIT NO.
42:
.ANNUAL
BUDGET
2,664
85,000
1':1,500
25,300
15 1050 I
6S7'843~
1,225
l'~OO .
74,426
882,008
-----------
1':12,745
2':1,238
2_3,143
5,550
41 , 766
- ~--'COl 6
5,310
64,711
3,836
- 9,-000
20,867
--------. 8-J-6-~.o
1 ,405
3,900
8/838
364,86'0
16,267
-------,"1 ,155
67,336
-882, OO.~.
Mission Statement
"The South Bay Family YMCA is dedicated to Improving the quality of hUfllan Ide find tu ht_'l!llll!! ,11/ i't",,:'I.
realIze their fullest potentm! as clJ/fdren of God through development of the splnt. flJ/()(J ,it!(i Ii, i, 1',
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
FUNDING APPLICATION FOR 1993-94
Fe.". 'OD.3
tIl L...'v
Ru.c".wd
CommUl1it~ [);;:t:i,~;);i "I'
Department
NOTE: THIS APPliCATION IS DUE NO LATER THAN MARCH 1,1993 AT 5
P.M. AT THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COMMUNITY DEVEWPMENT
DEPARTMENT, 276 FOURTH AVE., CHULA VISTA.
Program/Project Name: South Bay Family YMCA Summer Day Camp
Name of Organization: South Bay Family YMCA
Gigi M. Michaels
Tina Williams
Program Coordinator
Title Executive Director
Address:
1. Amount of Funding Requested:
Telephon_____
$ 7,000
$ 6,000
2. Amount of 1992-93 CDBG funding:
3. If this is an existing program, how many
years has it served Chula Vista residents?
4. Is this program physically located in Chula Vista?
~ years
Yes
5. Describe the main goal (s), objectives, and activities of your organization:
It is the goal of the South Bay Family YMCA to improve the quality of human life by
helping people realize their fullest potential through the development of the spirit,
mind and body. We offer a variety of programs for youths and adults that build
relationships. develop new skills, nurture self esteem, clarify values, promote per-
sonal growth, appreciate diversity, foster a greater sense of community and help
individuals become better leaders and supporters. During 1993 we will serve over
5,000 girls and boys in our various programs, including Summer Day Camp, Holiday
Camp, Spring Camp, School-age Childcare. Gymnastics, Movement Education.
Youth Fitness. Gym Ventures. Basketball, T-ball, Softball. Soccer. Tae Kwon Do. Y
Indian Guides and Open Book Reading.
6. Describe the specific program for which funds are requested: (If you are only
requesting funds for general organizational support, go to question # 10).
The South Bay family YMCA Summer Camp program is designed to help children
grow physically, mentally, and spiritually. These children are given the opportunity
to participate in a variety of activities including, sports, field trips, community
involvement, arts & crafts, songs, games, and just plain fun. Under the guidance of
caring, well trained staff, our YMCA summer day camp gives children an experience
that lasts a lifetime.
7. Why is this program needed in Chula Vista?:
The South Bay Family YMCA Day Camp is needed in Chula Vista to provide all day
supervision for children during the school's summer break. This is particularly
important for families where both parents are working, low income families, and in
families where parents are attending school. Parents are given the opportunity to
gain experience and training which improves skills that are necessary to become a
financially self-supporting family unit.
8. Who will be providing the services? Briefly describe qualifications of key staff
and indicate their level of education/training:
The South Bay Family YMCA works hard to select leaders who will be positive adult
role models, who have a sincere interest in each child's experience, and who
demonstrate responsibility, maturity and reliability. Program Director must be at
least 21 years old, have a college education, and a minimum of 5 years child care
experience. Counselors in our program are at least 18 years of age and they must
have CPR and First Aid certification. All staff are fingerprinted, have their
references checked and must attend pre-employment training as well as frequent
training during the summer.
9. Program Budget: Total: $ 153.000
(Include only those expenses directly related to the program for which funding is
requested).
Salaries/Benefi ts:
CDBG
$ 1 ,200
OTHER FUNDS
$ 86,100
Rent/Utilities:
2,250
Equipment/Supplies:
1,800
13,100
Other Ar.tivitiAs/FiAlri
trips
Other Food (Snacks)
2,300
18,850
600
8,400
Other Transportation
1,100
10,800
Other Administrative
6,500
Suhtotals:
$ 7,000
$ 146,000
10. Specify exactly how the CDBG funds will be used:
The CDBG funds will be used to provide summer day camp services to low income
families residing in the community. Funds will be used to subsidize expenses for
supplies. equipment and snacks as well as field trips. staff wages and other
necessary operational costs.
II. Please list the name and amount of other secured or potential sources of
funding for this specific program:
Program Fees: $138.000
Current SupporUFund-raising
United Way
$ 8.000
12. Do you anticipate needing CDBG funding for this program in subsequent
years? Yes X No
If yes, how much funding will be needed each year?
1994-95 $ 8.000 1995-96 $ 8.500 1996-97 $ 9,000
13. Who will be served by your program or organization and what are the
boundaries of your service area.?
The South Bay Family YMCA serves primarily children of the community who need
all day supervision while parents are working or attending school. Our day camp
is designed to serve girls and boys entering Kindergarten through 7th grade. We
also have a Counselor-In-Training program for youths 8th through 12th grade
which provides training and develops leadership skills. Our service area in
includes Chula Vista. Bonita and parts of National City, however our programs are
open to everyone.
14. How do people find out about your program? How do you do outreach?
Our clientele is obtained from various sources including: previous participants.
advertising. word of mouth. YMCA transfers and walk-ins. We also receive referrals
from: the school districts. Child Care Resource Services. Department of Social
Services, GAIN and Family Stress Center.
The YMCA community outreach programs include: youth programs located through-
out the community, financial assistance to subsidized program fees for low income
families. referral services that provide a source of information about community
resources, and staff participation in community organizations and committees that
are working to improve the quality of life for families in our community.
15. Do you assist clients to get to your program site or provide services out of the
community?
Our Summer Day Camp program has the capability of busing croildren. who need our
services, to our camp program. The South Bay Family YMCA Summer Camp Program
operates within the city of Chula Vista however we do not limit our program to include
only residents of this area. The YMCA is for everybody!
16. For this specific program for which CDBG is requested, estimated the total
number of:
a. Total clients served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94 40 Ichildr..n 11 11 wp.p.k!'\",350 weeks 01 camp)
1992-93 33 (children l( 10 weeks=250 weeks 01 camp)
1991-92 350 (previously calculated camper weeks)
b. Chula Vista residents served or to be served in:
1993-94 35
1992-93 26
1991-92 190 (previously calculaled camper weeks)
c. Low income clients served or to be served in:
(low-income is defined as follows: Iperson=$23,150; 2persons=$26,450;
3persons=$29,750; 4persons=$33,050)
1993-94 40
1992-93 32
1991-92 150 (previously calculaled camper weeks)
17. What methods will you use to account for the income level and other
demographic information on your clients?
Upon registration into the program statistical information is collected and
stored in a computer data base. Families who need financial assistance must
complete a financial assistance application. This form is then submitted with
proof of income (e.g. income tax form, AFDC verification). After a personal
interview eligibility can be determined. The South Bay Family YMCA uses
HUD standards to determine financial assistance eligibility.
PLEASE ATIACH THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
a) A PROGRAM BROCHURE OR FLYER (if you have one)
b) A CURRENT LIST OF YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS (one page)
c) A COMPLETE LIST OF CURRENT SOURCES OF REVENUE (one page)
Camp
Summer Day
Camp
Join The Fun! ! !
The South Boy Family YMCA provides one
of the most positive summer camp
experiences found anywhere in Son Diego
County. Your child con learn, grow
ond enjoy the summer in 0
fun ond safe environment
YMCA campers 180m while they play
.DevelopingnewskUlsOndgOiningconfidence
in individual obHities
. Learn to understand one's self and one's
values
. Develop independence which support the
growth Of leadership skills,
Camp leaders give you peace 01 mind
. Positive role models thot demonstrate
maturity ond responsibility.
Registration begins April 24. 1993
Stop by the South Boy Family YMCA on Summer
Sign-up Day, April 24th and reserve 0 spot lor
your child. All Campers whO register on this day
will receive 0 FREE Summer or '93 T-Shirt. Parents
will be eligible to register their child for comp with
a 55.00 per session. per person deposit, This de-
poSit is non-refundable and non-transferable. After
April241h a $1 0.00 per session, pet' person deposit
will be required 10 reserve a spot. This deposit is
non-refundable and non-transferable.
Financial Assistance
The South Boy Family YMCA hosa financial ossis.
tonce programovailablefarramllieswhoqualify
Financial asslstonce applications for any 01 the
Summer Camp progroms will be accepted
through May 31. 1993, A S5.00 per session, per
person deposit will be required Thls deposit Is
non-refundable and non-translaloble
,
,
Camp
Specialty Camps
Grades 5.1
If you're looking for something a little bit different this summer. or have 0 child with a speco,
interest we have 0 camp for you! Pion your child's summer with our specialty camp progra.T1S
Each Camp is offered on 0 weekly basis Alllhatls required is 0 520.00 non-refundable. non Ironsfer
able deposit per Child to reserve a spot. The balance 01 your camp fee is due ten days before tile
start of each camp. Drop off and pick-up will continue to be at Sweetwater / ROhr Po;\(
The YMCA is tor Everybody!
Trocmionol Day camp offers programs for children
entering Kindergarten through 6th grade
Specialty Camps for children enleling 5th through
7th grode
SUmmef School After School Camp for students
attending summer SChOOl through fhe Chula Vista
City SchOOl DistriCt grodes K-6.
Counselor In Troinlng Program for youth entering
8th through 12th grode.
Batters up!
A week of baseball for the base-
ball enthusiosf. Trips to other Y's for
base ball games. leorn how to
lead baseball cord stats. and
attend 0 Padre game.
Fee: $85.00 Mernbet'
$100.00 Partlctpont
Available session F
Counselor in Training
This unique program Is open to youth whO are
entering 8th ttvough 12 grode, This progrom
offers pre-employment training in the oreos of
fOllOwing directiOns. teom work. group manage.
ment, and record keeping. Each elT (Counselor
in training) will be matched up with on experi-
enced counselor for guidance and leadership
EoChdoywil1 include 0 group workShOp which will
include Skill development In filling out 0 job or,pli-
cation, Job Interview fechniques, and group dy-
namics
Admission to thiS special program is by personal
interview. 011 applications must be tiled by June
4.1993.
There is 0 one time non-refundable fee of $50.00.
which is due upon acceptance. and includes 011
of the above training. two T-shirts. and a elT
handbook
Hoof Beat
JOin us each day, learn riding skills.
proper cOle of horses, and hOrse
maintenance. Each camper will
be required to wear boots or hord
soled shoes. and jeans or heavy
pants (helmets are recom-
mended)
Fee: $215.00 Member
$225.00 Participant
Availoble session: C
Summer School Camp
ESpeCkJlly designed lor Children attending sum-
mer school. campers will be bussed to our camp
site at Rohr Par\( in Chula Vista for a fun filled
afternoon. Each day wUI include sports, gomes.
CIOftS. ond 0 nutritiOnOI snack 011 under the super-
vision of our trained YMCA camp stoff
Fees: $45.00 member I $60.00 particIpant
Gigl Michaels l' Program Coordinator
8
Cooking Today
Ice Skating
learn basic nutflfional values, lao!e
setting. cooking tools. and l"::Jr"'SI(::-
lion of recipes. Campers Will QiS;::> \ILS~
a restaurant kitchen and tour 0
grocery store
Fee: $110.00 Member
$125.00 Participant
Available seSSion J
Ice Skating techniques will be taught by
on experienced skating profeSSional
Eoch day will include 0 skating lew>n
and on opportunity to practice thOse
skills.
Fee: $110 Member
$125.00 Participant
Available session: G
Wet 'N' Wild
Go with the flow. tube down
the river and ride the slides of
Wild Rivers Water Pork. Each
day will inClude a wet swim-
ming adventure. highlighted by
a trip to Wild Rivers Water
safety will be stressed
Fees: $100.00 Member
$115.00 Porticipant
Available sessions: S,E,H,&J
Arts & Crafts
The focus of thiS camp IS cr~-
ativity. Each camper Wid be
encouraged to develop fr,id
creativity througr. Various Grof-
prOjects, One day sand SClI'P-
ture prOject conducted ay:::
representative from tt',e XJ~":::
Castle Coalition
Fee, $90.00 Member
$105.00 Participant
AvailaOle seSsion B
Spaces Are Limited
(All camp activities ore subject to chonge)
Gigi Michaelsi' Program Coordinator
9
\~
Su<lth Bay Farnily YMCA
50 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
(619) 422-8354 FAX (619) 422-4412
Board of Management
1992.1993
Larry Cunningham, Chair
Vice Chairs:
Pam Smith
Sandy Murphy
Susie Conners
Chuck Day
Mike Pradels
T. Pal Cavanaugh,
Secrelary- Treasurer
Penny Allen, Past Chair
Members:
Vince Acosta
Ken Baumgartner
Mickie Beyer
Don Blind
Joanne Carson
J.R. Chantengco
Norma Colunga
Melvin Cowherd
Greg Cox
Mary Lynn Deddeh
Gen Dillingham
Rick Emerson
Mike Finch
....."lug Fuller
bert Garcia
Ke~h Gentry
Fred Harder
Carl Harry
Bill Haul
Robert Hildt
Barbara Hunsaker
Ranie Hunter
DlCkKau
Rosemary Lane
Armando Martinez
Dan Mendez
Dave Michelson
Ken Monson
Peter Moore
Kathy Parker
Ken Screeton
Art Sellgren
John Shoc>iey Jr, M D
Bruce Sl0an
Patricia Smith
Dr. John Vugrln
RicWilliams
Brad Wilson
Tina Williams, Executive Director
Heritage Club
Penny & David Allen
. "ris & Sandy Chase
.liam Cheverton
Mel & Midge Cowherd
Patiy Erickson
Doug & Barbara Fuller
YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION
. STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENSES
FOR
.TLlly Iq.,~ - :JUf\e /"Q3
,
DESCRIPTION
CONTRIBUTIONS-UNRESTRICTED
CURRFNT SUPPORT
PECIAL EVENTS (NETI
ONTRACT REVENUE.
EMBERSHIP DUES
ROGRAM FEES
PECIAl INTEREST REVENUE
ERCHANDISE SALES
INVESTMENT INCOME
UBSIDY ALLOCATION
OTAL BRANCH REVENUE
-------------------------------
ALARIES & \.JAGES
MPLOYEE BENEFITS
AYROLL TAXES
ONTRACT SERVICE
UPPLIES
ELEPHONE
OSTAGE & SHIPPING
ENT/CARE OF BLDG./INSURANCE-
TILlTIES
RIN1ING EXPENSE
RANSPORTATION
ONFFRENCES & TRAININ-G------
UBSCRIPTIONS & REF MATL
OVERT ISING & PROMOTION" .---
ATIONAL DUI::S
-PECn-L TNTERES-f--EXPE Nsf
GUIPMENT
. IscE'LLMIEO-US' EXl'-ENSE
ENERAL OFFICE SUPPORT
OrAL BRANCH EXPENSE
N ~ T 0 U T COM E
r-=--~
YMCA OF SAN DIEGO
SOUTH BAY
REPORTING UNIT NO.
41::
.ANNUAl
BUDGET
2,554
85,000
19,500
25,300
15,050
I
I
657,643-----1
1,2<'5 i
1,000 .
7~'426j
882,008
---- ---- ----
192,745
- ..-------- -.----,
<'9,238 I
23,143 '
- --...------.-----
5,550
41, 766
--4,0-U,-
5,310
____n____________
64,711
3,836
9,-600
20,867
B--~--6 ~:6
1 ,405
] ,--90 0
8,838
364,2.65
1(,,267
11 J 16S
67,3"36
82.2) 00.<::,
l'r.'l SI:n
Mission Statement
"The South Bay Family YMCA is dedicated to Improvmg the qualtly of human !tie and to Ild/"";} ,tll I"" 'I ,I,
realize theIr fullest potential as children of God through development of the spint, fTJ:nd .. If I( I i,()( IV '
n,ltrir:13 Sm:th
4
CITY OF CHULA VISTA ';2 FEB 1993
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANTS Conrm~~;~ved
FUNDING APPLICATION FOR 1993-94 ,DeP8rtf11:~;oPI11ent I~ i
c.
:"'" r~"
NOTE: THIS APPLICATION IS DUE NO LATER THAN MARCFic'1.4'0,rr!'
1993 AT 5:00 P.M. AT THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COMMUNITY
DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, 276 FOURTH AVE., CHULA VISTA
Program/Project Name: South Bay Family YMCA Sunshine Co. Childcare
Four Childcare Centers
Name of Organization: South Bay Family YMCA
Contact Person: Alberta (Peaches) Hartung
Title: Childcare Director
Address:
1. Amount of Funding Requested:
$
44.279.00
2. Amount of 1992-93 CDBG Funding:
$
15.000.00
3.
If this is an existing program, how many
years has it served Chula Vista residents?
6
years
4.
Is this program physically located in Chula Vista?
Yes
5. Describe the main goal(s), objectives, and activities of your
organiza tion:
In 1993 the South Bay Family YMCA will touch the lives of 5000+
children providing a variety of enrichment activities that compliment the
needs and interest of children which include Childcare. Camps, Gymnastics.
Youth Sports, and Literary Programs. Children learn new skills while they
receive guidance and challenge from positive role models with whom they
can identify and share their triumphs. The overall YMCA Mission is to
develop the inner strength of the children and their families by increasing
self-confidence, feelings of self-worth and recognition, appreciation of the
child's own uniqueness and motivating them to grow toward their full
potential. Families entrust us with the care of their children because of the
YMCA'S reputation of high standards and sincere concern for the welfare of
our youth and their future.
6. Describe the specific program
(If you are only requesting funds
support, go to question #10).
for which funds are requested:
for general organizational
The Sunshine Company is a state-licensed, national YMCA childcare
program. The program provides for youth when there may be no adult
supervision available in the home. We provide children a relaxed, non-
pressured atmosphere so they may learn and have fun. Our activities
encourage physical fitness and include sports, arts & crafts, quiet games,
homework help, and nutritional snacks, all designed to accommodate the
low-income and varied parental structures commonplace today. Our staff
are carefully selected to ensure that our children receive the highest
possible commitment of quality care, supervision and guidance that our
families deserve for their most precious possessionhtheir children. Our
vision encompasses not just the needs of the individual child, but also the
family and community. Our programs are built with the entire family in
mind.
7. Why is the program needed in Chula Vista?
We aim to provide a better lifestyle for the youth of our community
by continuing to provide childcare services to Chula Vista families in those
neighborhoods where predominantly low income, minority, disadvantaged
and single parents reside. Specifically, the childcare sites at Otay, Vista
Square, Feaster, and Hilltop Elementary Schools are in special need. 51 % of
our children come from single parent homes and 87% from low & median
income families. Our effort is to provide childcare for low-income working
families and families currently receiving public assistance who are taking
vocational or skill-improvement classes to aid employability.
8. Who will be providing the services? Briefly describe
qualifications of key staff and indicate their level of
ed uca tion/tra i ni ng:
The South Bay Family YMCA Childcare Program is directed by Mrs.
Alberta (Peaches) Hartung, each school site is headed by a Site Supervisor
who is assisted by several Teachers/Aides. Some site personnel also serve
as van or bus drivers.
Mrs. Hartung's qualifications include a degree in Child Development
and fourteen years of childcare supervisory experience. The Site
Supervisors and Teachers must be at least 21 and have completed twelve
college units in one of the following curricula: Early Childhood Education,
Child Development, or Physical Education/Recreation appropriate to school
age children. Site Supervisors are required to have taken a college class in
Administration as well.
All childcare staff meet State of California Community Childcare
Licensing requirements, passed fingerprint and criminal clearance, and are
medically sound according to State Health regulations. Site employees
must be certified in CPR and First Aid techniques. Also, childcare workers
are required to attend regular in-service staff training sessions. Each site
conducts periodic fire & earthquake safety drills, and staff are advised
regarding use of extinguishers and related safety equipment & procedures.
Bus/Van Drivers are trained, examined and licensed by the California
Highway Patrol and State Department of Motor Vehicles. Each site is
operated by sufficient personnel to ensure maximum ratio of twelve
children per adult worker.
9. Program Budget: Total: $
(Include only those expenses directly
funding is requested).
147.579.00
related to the program for which
CDBG OTHER FUNDS
SalarieslBenefits: $ 28,750 $ 67,085
RentlUtilities: 1,125 2,625
Equipment/Supplies: 885 2,062
Administrative Expense: 9,250 21,581
Training/Con ference/lnservice: 1,200 2,803
Food/Snacks: ),507 3,516
Transportation: 145 340
Insurance: 337 787
Promotion: 556 1,296
Field Trips: 347 811
Misc./License Fee: 177 412
Subtotals: $ 44,279.00 $ 103,318.00
10. Specify exactly how the CDRG funds will be used:
The South Bay Family YMCA Sunshine Company wishes to assist low
income families experiencing financial hardship by providing financial aid
for their childcare fees. Many of these are single female head of household
families where the parent must work or take vocational classes.
Specifically, awarded funds would be used for supplies and
equipment including books, games, sporting goods. first aid kits, craft &
science projects, nutritional snacks, field trips, as well as staff wages,
benefits, insurance, and other necessary costs.
11. Please list the name and amount of other secured or
potential sources of funding for this specific program:
Program Fees
Current Support/Fundraising
$ 73.799
$ 29.5]9
12. Do you
subsequent
anticipate
years?
needing CDBG funding for this program in
Yes
x
No
If Yes, how much funding will be needed each year?
1994-95 $ 44.000
1995-96 $ 44.000
1996-97 $ 44.000
The amount needed will depend upon program growth and receipts
from other funding sources.
13. Who will be served by your program and what are the
boundaries of your service area?
The primary recipients of our service are the children of families
where adult supervision is limited by parents' need to work or attend
classes. Our program is designed to serve boys and girls of all ethnic
origins and religious affiliations, in kindergarten through the sixth grade
who attend school either at or near a YMCA childcare site.
14. How do people find out about your program?
do outreach?
How do you
Our clientele learn of our services by previous partiCipants,
advertising, word of mouth, YMCA transfers, walk-ins, and also by
referrals from schools, Childcare Resource Services, Social Service Agencies,
GAIN, and Family Stress Centers.
15. Do you assist clients to get to your program site or provide
services out in the community?
Yes. The childcare site will be located on school grounds. Also, we
use the Chula Vista School District under the Transportation Latchkey
Coalition (TLC) to provide transportation to our childcare sites depending
on space availability.
16. For this specific program for which CDBG is requested,
estimate the total number of :
a. Total clients served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94 105
1992-93 100
1991-92 96
b. Chula Vista residents served or estimated to be served
in:
1993-94 100
1992-93 96
1991-92 93
c. Low-income clients served or estimated to be served in:
(low-income household is defined as follows: 1 person=$23,150
2person=$26,450; 3person=29,750; 4person=$33,050)
1993-94 98
1992-93 94
1991-92 88
17. What methods will you use to account for the income level
and other demographic information on your clients?
The Chula Vista City School District has furnished the present
statistics being used. The income level will be determined by the most
current HUD income limits for the San Diego SMSA. Residency and income
will be verified from the current Income Tax return or the previous
month's payroll information.
PLEASE A TT ACH THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
a) A PROGRAM BROCHURE OR FLYER (if you have one)
b) A CURRENT LIST OF YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS (one page)
c) A COMPLETE LIST OF CURRENT SOURCES OF REVENUE (one
page)
~'\\ ~AY. ~.," ,;. ". '.. .......~ ..,.~ .'
~~' . ..-;....,~">....v.,., ~". ""','. ..her~... .'
. .",".-. -'"<, , ,;/~l~,. ..,._";-"_"'-,', ~., ,,"y,',::.,'1';;'J ',' '~', ,_ , ."V~If"." ,.'t:-
.... '. . v......M.... ~." ..~^'.~~l'... .....;'........'Ac"".....'...'.'...'..:'...'.............'....)~.......'.~....'.>... .~......_.""J!''''.''''''._}'..,.
'.;:r';' 5:.,1.::: .' ~,~ ~~~~~~~..~i~H~~jJ,~~~~sunS..-.ne.i .
.~~it~~~~.;;~ .:':.}1:::;::;~:.i~~;:~~~~;t.~X~~i~.~'~'p'..'~a'l~tli,l!llM."".....,C.A.~'. '.,
n~ '....'< ..,,-:t'~na " 1 ' . c" f'I..']I ~I"\ r~ l~r ,
'r.':.::~:~1.\:';'" ';"; (';,~~~~1'J.\"::~_~.~f~~;;t~~_l'r" . ~_~zt-;,~::.
:L';~;:,;>,' "':~;~Jr.; ~~':p'. .:.;.~ ~ ~"#Ii "';;n~~}ri1e'~:Ti;fr1I~.i. 7~.~ i'" l<:"::~, ~:.,. . .
>..,~:~.;r,:~..' . "~~" ll~~Wl.~<e~lID..!!J.!Jlit. .~.. '~~l. .....1;;.
,. 1 ' ~.. " to~. ...~, , , ': >. ~ . t ..:j<, '
7 '- {,,, f.fft.~"'<,~h~.~~~"'~,~~.~~~~~~J..l~~.t'1~~~~~~~::~~~f~ '.,I',:~
., ,'i :l~;" . ,~_ ,:It>...."\(-l)"''(..c;....."..j~':~J~l~,,~, , /!-'t}"';'~''''' h .. 0, ,~.... ~t.;.l,..t;~t!~~~~l q"'~7fr'.iH l~tM~ . I ...
~ . ~..., ~1' ....,..'Y """"-',. ," . .
" "
,";'.~' .Ji :.,,,.~,,I/:
....,.
'.''-.''', "
'*Quality Unique childca:~e:"'
*State Licensed
'*QualifiedStaff"" .'
.... ~Special Family Events
\:'*Financla1 Assistance .. ' ..' ;"."
*DaycCampJ:i are Offered during
School Breaks & Some Holidays .
'~.-' , "
JRJEGJISTJE~', N(f))W'"
JLiimJj}jtce~ SJI>>~~ce
All Registrations Taken At:
South Bay Family YMCA
50 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Supported. in pa:t. by
.
United Way/CHAO
Campaign
YMCA Office Hours Are:
Monday Friday 8:00am H)Opm
Saturday 9.00am lJJ()pm
8e Habla EsparlOl
'." Childcare Director:
Alberta (Pea'bhes) Hartung
For More Information Call: 422-8354
,~
South Bay Family YMCA
50 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
(619) 422-8354 FAX (619) 422-4412
Board of Management
1992.1993
Larry Cunningham, Chair
Vice Chairs:
Pam Smnh
Sandy Murphy
Susie Conners
Chuck Day
Mike Pradels
T Pat Cavanaugh,
Secretary-Treasurer
Penny Allen, Past Chair
Members:
Vince Acosta
Ken Baumgartner
Mickie Beyer
Don Blind
Joanne Carson
J. R. Chantengco
Norma Colunga
Melvin Cowherd
Greg Cox
Mary Lynn Deddeh
Geri Dillingham
Rick Emerson
Mike Finch
~ 'ug Fuller
Jert Garcia
Kenh Gentry
Fred Harder
Carl Harry
Bill Haul
Roberl Hlldt
Barbara Hunsaker
Ranie Hunter
Dick Kau
Rosemary Lane
Armando Martinez
Dan Mendez
Dave Michelson
Ken Monsen
Peter Moere
Kathy Parker
Ken Screeton
Arl Sellgren
John Shockley Jr, M.D
Bruce Sloan
Palricla Smith
Dr. John Vugnn
RlcWilliams
Brad Wilson
Tina Williams. Executive Diredor
Heritage Club
Penny & David Allen
.~ & Sandy Chase
,am Cheverton
Mel & Midge Cowherd
PaILy Erickson
OOCig & Barbara Fuller
DC)il Sir"
PatriCia Smith
YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION
. STATEMENT OF REVENUES AND EXPENSES
FOR
July (q'l~- :June. /"Q3
YMCA OF SAN DIEGO
SOUTH BAY
REPORTING UNIT NO,
'Ie:
:..:t: _, ~; --
, DESCRIPTION .ANNUAL
.,." BUDGET
CONTRIBUTIONS-UNRESTRICTED 2,664
CURRENT SUPPORT 85,000
SPECIAL EVENTS (NET) 19,500 I
i:ONTRACT REVENUe;;1" . 25,300
""
1EMBERSHIP DUES 15,050 i
ROGRAM FEES
SPECIAL INTERESr~REVENUE 657,843 I
~ERCHANDISE SALE'S' 1,2e'S ;
INVESTMENT INCOME 1,000
;;UBS I DY ALLOCATION 74,426
OTAL BRANCH REVENUE 882,008
------------------------------- ------------
_._- _....~-_._----
SALARIES & \.lAGES 192,745
--.- ---------- - ..-- "
.MPLOYEE BENEFITS 29,238 I
AYROLL TAXES _.- -~- ___33, '-';:3
CONTRACT SERVICE 5,550
SUPPLI ES _,_ n__ 41, 766
ELEPHONE .- - -'C016
~OSTAGE & SHIPPING -- 5,310
-----.--------...-
<ENT/CARE OF BLDG./INSURANCE 64,711
JTILITIES 3,836
'RIN1ING EXPENSE ----- 9,000j
rRANSPORTATION 2 0 ,_~~_7j
_ONFERENCES & TRAINING 8 1 o~.o
SUBSCRIPTIONS & REF MATL 1,405
~DVERTISING & PROMOTION - 3,-906
~ATIONAL DUF.:S 8,833 I
SPECIAL I NTERESTEXPE NS-C ' - 3E.4,B6S
EGUIPMENT 16,267 i
,
MISCELLANE-OUS'EXP-ENSE . j 1,165 i
GENERAL OFFICE SUPPORT 67,336
OlAI-BRANCH Exf>FNsE - - 882,OO.<.?
N I-c T 0 U T C 0 M E
I
r: - - ------ -
_u _n___ _
Mission Statement
"The South Bay Family YMCA IS dedicated to improvmg the quality of human life and 10 helpllIY ,.ii i""
realize therr fullest potential as children of God through development of the spint mll1d 81" f /><,," ..
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
FUNDING APPLICA nON FOR 1993-94
NOTE: THIS APPLICATION IS DUE NO LATER THAN MARCH 1, 1993 AT 5
P.M. AT THE CIIT OF CHULA VISTA, COMMUNIIT DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT, 276 FOURTH AVE., CHULA VISTA.
SHARED HOUSING
Program/Project Name:
Name of Organization:
SOUTH COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING
Contact Person: Maxine Whittington Title Director
Chula Vista, CA 91912
Telephone
I. Amount of Funding Requested:
$ 1 5,000.
$ 1 5,000.
2. Amount of 1992-93 CDBG Funding:
3. If this is an existing program, how many
years has it served Chula Vista residents?
11
years
4. Is this program physically located in Chula Vista?
Yes
5. Describe the main goal(s), objectives, and activities of your organization:
Our program goal is to promote a Shared Housing service
where two or more persons share living arrangements and
share in housing related expenses, or exchange services
in lieu of rent, thereby serving both their financial
and social needs. The Shared Housing program often
assists handicapped or frail elderly by providing a
sharer who can provide home services in lieu of rent.
This will allow the owner to remain in their home rather
than become institutionalized.
Shared Housing is a non-profit organization providing a
free service to seniors, including handicapped and frail
elderly, and low and moderate income persons.
In addition to the Shared Housin6 program, SCCOA board
members visit nursing homes inthe area on a quarterly
basis providing a social hour with entertainment for the
patients. They select nursing homes where patients have
infrequent visitors or few family members keeping in touch.
6. Describc Ibc spedfic prognllll fo,' which fllllds aI'C ....'1l1cslcd: (If JOII :I"C ollly
"c'I"cslillg (""ds ({)l' gCllc,.,,' ()l'g:llliz:llioll:ll s"ppo,'I, go to qllestioll # 10),
F'undr. wi 11 he ur.ed for n Sharer! lIour. Lng pl'ogrnm wid eh 111ft t.""""
homeowners and home-seekers in a compatible home-slll1ring
arrangement as a housing alternative for low and moderate
income ReniorR and otherR in the South San Diego County.
7, Why is this I"'ogmlll lIeeded in Chura Vista?:
There is a shortage of low CaRt rentals ill the area and
an increase in senior population and low and modArate
income persons. Most of our clients have only a small
Social Security income. Many who have applied for housing
assistance under Section 8 or other supplemental housing
are on a long waitin/', list. Shared lIousing can help rill
the gap for these persons.
8. Who will he Ill'oviding Ihe sel"Vices'! I\,.;eny dpslTihe 'I II a Iirkaliolls of key
staff :1I,d indicale Iheir' level of edllc:llioll/lmilling:
Director: High School, College and business school. 43 years
office experience with clerical, accounting and counselin6'
Shared Housing employee since 1984.
Bi-lingual Clerk Counselor: High School, Area Agency on Aging
on-site training at Our Lady of Angels working with Seniors
in Social and Nutrition programs. Shared Housing employee
since 1984.
9, I'l'ogmlll Budget: Total: $ 30,000.
(Include only those expenses directly related to the program for which funding is
requcstcd),
(taxes)
Salaries/Benefits:
Vac. & Sick Leave
I<enl/Utilities: (Phone)
Insurance
loqllipnlenl/Supplies:
Bookkeeping &
Other Postage
Travel &
Olher Training
CDBG
$10,736.
1,176.
754.
458.
420.
$
(Countv of San Diego)
OTHER FUNDS
$ 10,736.
1,176.
754.
458.
420.
556.
556.
360.
360.
Other Advertising
540.
540.
Snhtotals:
$ 15,000.
$
$ 15,000.
10. Specify exactlyJlOw_the COBC funds wiII be used:
Funds will be used to pay 50% of wages and benefits for
Director/BoOkkeeper, 5 days a week and a bi-lingual clerk
counselor, 5 days a week.
Other expenses paid at 50% include Insurance, office supplies,
rent, telephone, advertising, postage and bookkeeping service.
II. Please list the name and amount of other sccured or poteutial sources of
fuuding for this specific program:
County of San Die~o - Housing and Community Development
3989 Ruffin Road - San Diego, CA 92123
Referral: Joan Herskowitz (694-4807) CDBG project
monitoring and administrative support.
Funding amount - $15,000. for three-year period
beginning 2/1/93-1/31/94.
12. 00 you anticipate needing COBC funding for this program in subsequeut
years? Yes X No
If yes, how llIuch fnuding will be nceded each year'?
1994-95 $15,000. 1995-96 $ 15,000. 1996-97 $ 15,000.
13. \Vho wiII be served by your program and what are the bonndaries of your
service arca~!
c
Our clients will be seniors, including handicapped and
frail elderly and low and moderate income persons. This
will include all ethnic groups;
We are serving the South Bay area which covers Chula VIsta,
Bonita, Imperial Beach, Coronado, San Ysidro, South San Diego,
National City and Paradise Hills.
14. 1I0w do people find out about your program? 1I0w do you do oUII'each?
Many are referrals from Social SErvices , Senior service
centers, hospitals, walk-ins and a large response from
LOCAL Newspaper advertising and spot radio and TV announce-
ments. Others are referrals from clients who ~ave used our
services. We are associated with the Providers in the area,
who also send referrals. We speak at various organizations
and attend functions ~here literature may be distributed.
15. 00 you assist c1icnts to gct to your program site or providc services out in the
comlllunity?
We register homeowners by telephone and make a home visit
so that we have a description of what is available to the
home seeker. If the seeker is unable because of a handicap
to corne to our office to register, we will go to the seeker
for an application and take them to a homeowner to see the
place offered.
16. For this specific program for which CDBG is requested, estimate the total
number of:
a. Total clients served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94
1992-93
1991-92
lAO - p"'timated
299 - served
d" ccrved
b. Chula Vista residents served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94
1992-93
1991-92
228 - estimated
162 - served
741'; - ",prved
c. Low-income clients served or estimated to be served in:
(low-income household is defined as follows: I person =$23, 150; 2person=$26,450;
3person =$29,750; 4person =$33,050)
1993-94
1992-93
1991-92
70'1
165 -
771 -
p"'timated
sprved
<;prved
17. What methods will you use to account for the income level and other
demographic information on your clients?
Each client has a registration form which shows his source
of i~come and the amount received per month. Also we ask
for client's present address and pmount of rent paying.
We assign an intake number for the client and enter it in
a daily log with all of the above information. Each month
we prepare a monthly report for the Norman Park center
showing number of clients, zip code areas of clients,
income level and ethnicity.
PLEASE ATIACH THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
a) A PROGRAM BROCHURE OR FLYER (if you have one)
b) A CURRENT LIST OF YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS (one page)
c) A COMPLETE LIST OF CURRENT SOURCES OF REVENUE (one page)
SCCOA
SERVING
SENIORS
President:
South
County
Council
On Aging
Post Office Box 146
Chula Vista, California 92012
(619) 422-6876
Current list of board of Directors
SOUTH COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING
vice-President:
Secretary:
Treasurer:
Open at present
Shere Mann
Dorothy Showman
Past President:
REVENUE SOURCES f"OR SHARED HOUSING
City of Chula Vista - Community Development Dept.
County of San Diego - Housing and Community Development
.. "
SHARED HOUSING
~ '-,'"
,"-'
., .,~
':-'
l~;JJ
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COiYThfUNlTY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRA...'{T
FUNDING APPLICATION FOR 1993-94
;, ~:
l'ij,IlJ;i,;ill
, '~",,,;
NOTE: THIS APPLICA.TION IS DUE NO UTER THAN JL4RCH 1, 1993 AT 5
P..H. AT THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPART,HENT, 276 FOURTH AVE., CHUU VISTA.
Program/Project Name: Ccsa :-Jues~:-a
Name of Organization: Scu;:h BaY Ccmunity Se:-vices
Contact Person: Ka~.:-yn Lembo
Title Execu::2-ve Oi ~"'eCi:2::-
Address:
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Telephone
1. Amount of Funding Requested:
S 25,000.00
2. Amount of 1992-93 CDBG Funding:
S 15,OeO.00
3. If this is an e:"isting program, how many
years has it served Chula Vista residents?
3 years
4. Is this program physically located in Chub Vista?
i
yes t
5. Describe the main goal(s), objectives, and activities of your organization:
The o"e~3l2.. pu~po.:.e of South Bay Community S.:=r",ices is to re:.nforce t::;'e
E30lly's role in the community and to assis: youth to a$pire realistically
to li~es of self- fulfillillent.
Main Objectives include:
Juvenile Crime Prevention - reduction in "delinquency a~ong "~igh ~isk "
yout~ and reduction in recidivism among youth In the justice syste~.
P~~vention or the Exploitation & Abuse of Children & Yout~
Imp~ov~ f2mily funct:oni~g 3nd ?are~t:ng $kills.
Reduction of family viole~ce.
Provision of quality se~vices for runaway and homeless youth and their
families.
Provide quality after school care for young people.
P,ovide prevention education including Substance Abuse and AIDS prevention
education.
Empower youth through involvement in agency prog~ams and se~vices - such
as peer education/counselor project.
n_.....~ "',., ..""1..........00_ ,..,.,r\,..,.....j..111"l1 t-., PC: t:nr 1 o,.;:!.l ~e.sidents and students.
6. Describe the specific program for which funds are requested: (If you are only
requesting funds for general organizational support, go to question if 10).
See A:::tachllY'nc B
7. Why is this program needed in Chula Vista?:
See Attach~~n~ E
8. Who will be providing the services? Briefly describe qualifications of key
staff and indicate their level of education/training:
T~e Runaway and Homeless Youth ?=oject/Casa Nuestr3 ope~3t~$ u~d~~ t~e
supe~vl3ion of the Executive Oirecto"r, and under the policies at
SECS's Board or Directors. The Program Director, a MSU, oversees the
project and super~lses st~f:. Counseling and Case Manage~ent serv~ces
are ?rov~ded by a ~as~ers level counselor. All ot~er shelter sta5=
mee: and or excee~ state l~censi~g requirements. All servlces are bi
lingual.
9.. . Program Budget: Total: $ 335 , 740
(Include only those expenses directly related to the program for which funding is
requested) .
Salaries/Benefits:
CDBG
S 2,800.00
OTHER FUNDS
S
Rent/Utilities:
10,000.00
See accach8eoc 0
Equipment/Supplies:
3,000.00
Runa\lav and :-icJ"ieless
You:::h Services prcgyarn
Budge~
Other Focd
Residenc
Other Al10\vance
5,000.00
1,200.00
Other Insurance
2,000.00
Subtotals:
$25,000.00
$
10. Specify exactly how the CDnG funds will be used:
Funes ~..Jill be uS;::l.d ~oi.)a~d shf~l':.e!:' prcgram u~ilities/f?hC'ne, C01l[)lT'f2n-:.,
food, resicA:!1"L.s allotJanc2s, insurance, and awake nighc. !'"esiden\:.
supervision requir'~ by local Conditional Use Permit.
11. Please list the name and amount of other secured or potential sources of
funding for this specific program:
U.S. Dept.of I1ealth & Huren Services Basic Cem:.e:!:"
u. S. Dept. of Heal th & Human Service Drug P:!:"e'l.
FEE".
Ci 7.y of San Diego
o.s. Dep": of Jus"t.ice r.1issing Child!:'ens P~~2.m
Dcnaticn/Fourca~ions/Subcon~ac~s
120,000.00
90,000.00
10,00G.00
10,000.00
45,000.00
50 ,ooe .00
12. Do you anticipate needing CDBG funding for this program in subsequent
years? Yes X No
If yes, how much funding will be needed each year?
1994-95 $25,000 1995-96 $27 ,000 1996-97 S 28,000
13. Who will be served by your program and what are the boundaries of your
service area?
P.unaway & Homeless Ycum wi thin the Souu'1 Bay area
of San Diego Countcy. A!?rc::-o~:ir!'.a~ely, 50 to 60% of which a:!:"e
City of Chula Vista ~esidents. 9.0% of ::.'1ese youth a::-e
'lic:.ir:ls of abuse/neglec:. 60% are Latino, 20% Caucasion and
20% of oc.he:!:" ethnic origin.
14. How do people find out about your program? How do you do outreach?
Soum Bay Community Se-.rvices r.ain~ains a ,,-ell publicized
24 hou= hotl~~e, a 9rojL~~ safe place wi~~ local businesses
-::..'1a~ displays signs and 1e~ youm ll'alte calls to us. Ou=each
in ~"1e schools and s~~.;ets. Souw.' Bay Corrmunity
S~vices 21so ~eceived ~efe~als f~om local law enforcement
and O~T1e!." agencies.
15. Do you assist clients to get to your program site or provide services out in the
community?
Yes, s~aff '.Jill prov~de ttans[X)rtation.. Cab companies
provide free ta;ti. rides to the shf~lter a~ night.
Staff also make home visits and provide se-~ices
out. on d1(~ st:::'ce"t.s, in t..~e parks and scheol.
16. For this specific program for which CDEG is requested. estimate the total
number of:
a. Total clients served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94 620
1992-93 600
1991-92 500
b. Chula Vista residents served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94 310
1992-93 30e
1991-92 250
c. Low-income clients served or estimated to be served in:
(low-income household is defined as follows: 1person=S23.150; 2person=S26.450;
3person=S29.750; 4person=S33.050)
1993-94 600
1992-93 500
1991-92 400
17. What methods will you use to account for the income level and other
demographic information on your clients?
Self disclosure
PLEASE ATTACH THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
a) A PROGRAM BROCHURE OR FLYER (if you have one)
b) A CURREt'IT LIST OF YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS (one page)
c) A COMPLETE LIST OF CURRENT SOURCES OF REVENUE (one page)
Attachment B
6. S?~CI?IC p~OGaAa FO~ ~H=CH FUNDS ARE REQU~STED
Fund~ng is being requested for Casa Nuestra, a communl:Y based runaway
& homeless youth project, with an 8 bed shelte~.
ScrVlces uve~ a 12 ~ont~ ?e~~od include:
_ local shelter services 50r 60 youth
_ 24 hr. crisis interventlon services 50r '600 runaway and homeless
yout~ and their families
_ reunification and stabilization of 200 families.
_ long term alternative care and independent living services to 50
homeless youth.
_ street outreach, rihich targets the homeless street youth population
with a minimum of 200 contacts.
_ peer education component which provides Drug Prevention serv~ces
including groups and education and AIDS prevention education.
7. NEED FOR THIS PROGRAM IN CHULA VISTA
The South Bay has no other shelter .services other that Casa Nuestra.
The region because of its geographic and demographic characteristics,
has the potential for a significant number of Homeless/runaway youth.
Demographics of this region show a high incidence of poverty, with
approximately 27% of the families being single parent .households. In
addition, the South Bay has a 8.38% unemployment rate, as compared with
the county rate of 6.97%. Based on the Dept. of Health & Human
Services national estimate that 3% to A5 of youth run from home, in the
South Bay this would represent a figure of 3,150 to 6,300 runaways.
Given the;National Statistical survey ~inding that 762% stayed in their
original community this would mean for the area 2,268 to 4,536 needing
local services.
Another indicator of the need is the case of runaways reported to the
local law enforcement agencies.
Runaway Reports by Jurisdiction 1/89 - 12/90
National City P.D.
Chula Vista P.D.
Imperial Beach
San Diego P.D. (Southern Div.)
146
1,098
220
889
It is important to keep in mind that these are only the reporced
cases. Many experts agree that 50% of cases go unrepor"ed.
Currently, Casa Nuestra is turning away 10 -20 youth needing shelter
each month due to bed unavailability. Each year our street outreach
team contacts 150 runaway/homeless youth with in the City of Chula Vita
alone.
315 4th Avenue, Suite E . Chula Vista . CA 91910 . (619) 420-3620/9790/5051
BOARD OF DIRECTORS ROSTER
Charles L. Pugsley, President
Agent, C.V.Police De t.
President
Dept.
Ranie Hunter,
The Baldwin
CA 91950
Ty Compton
Compton & Associates
Chula vista, CA 91911
Charles Moore
Sales Manager
Laidlaw Waste Sys.
.........
Chula Vista, CA 91911
Emerald Randolph
Retired, Director
Chula vista Elementary
.....ct
Jamul, CA 91935
Ray-Etta Morrell
Altrusa Club
Freddie Nesbit
Retired, Consultant
California Youth Authority
Chula Vista, CA 91911
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Brad Wilson
Vice President
Wilson and Cox Insurance
Chula Vista, CA 91912
Tony Linares
Medical Director
~n~~Aetna Health Plan
~ Chula Vista, CA 91910
UnltedWlly
l'SanOieg:lCarty
SOUTH BAY COMMUNITY SERVICES, INC. . PAGE 1 OF 2
BUDGET
1992-1993
PROGRAM
REVENUE
DEPT. OF EDUCATION
K1DZBIZ FOUNDATION CARRYOVER
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO AS-gO
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO YSB
CDBG GRAFFITI
UNITED WAY
NCPD
NEIGHBORHOOD HOUSE SUBCONTRACT
CVPD GRAFfiTI & COUNSELING
SDYCS MEDIATION SUBCONTRACT
CUE NT FEES (D&C)
ACTION
SUHSD
CDBG DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
FOUNDATIONS/DONATIONS (D&V)
CUENT FEES (D&V)
CDBG COM DEVELOPMENT
COG FOUNDATION CARRYOVER
CDC FOUNDATIONIDONATION
$17,400
$20,500
$88,855
$91,600
$33,600
$48,000
$27,000
$21,986
$61.486
$8,800
$10,352
$20,000
$124,200
$15,000
$13,000
$1,380
$48,000
$19,000
$2,493
. PAGE 2 OF 2
SOUTH BAY COMMUNITY SERVICES BUDGET 92-93 CONTINUTED
CUENT FEES (BOAST)
SCPPP
OCJP
FOUNDATIONS/DONATIONS (BOASn
AGENCY GENERAL FUND (RESERVE)
HHS, R&HY BASIC CENTER I
HHS, R&HY BASIC CENTER"
HHS, R&HY DRUG PREVENTION I
HHS, R&HY DRUG PRECENTION II
CVPD
CDBG R&HY
FEMA X & XI
SDYCS AIDS SUBCONTRACT
MISSING CHILDREN
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO MCKINNEY
CONDO RESIDENTS RENT
FEES (R&HY)
R&HY FOUNDATION/DONATIONS
$23,000
$12,975
$6,781
$2,000
$11,135
$28,371
$90,000
$14,195
$67,445
$12,038
$15,000
$9,000
$2,900
$45,258
$10,000
$5,669
$1,000
$34,864
TOTAL
I $1,064,2831
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
FUNDING APPLICATION FOR 1993-94
NOTE: THIS APPLICATION IS DUE NO LATER THAN MARCH 1, 1993 AT 5 P.M.
AT THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, 276
FOURTH AVE., CHULA VISTA.
Program/Project Name: UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF AMATEUR ATHLETICS
Name of Organization: UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF AMATEUR ATHLETICS
Contact Person: Robert Coons
Title Chief Executive Officer
Address:
-----------
TelephoneJlllllllllllr
1. Amount of Funding Requested:
2. Amount of 1992-93 CDBG Funding:
$ 20,400
$
o
3. If this is a existing program, how many
years has it served Chula Vista residents?
7
years
4. Is this program physically located in
Chula Vista?
yes
5. Describe the main goal(s), objectives,
and activities of your organization:
The United States Institute of Amateur Athletics is a leader in
creating a vision of successful living in disadvantaged youth and
young adults. We channel their hostilities, frustrations, anger,
and aggression by providing Olympic Style amateur athletics as a
vehicle to promote values of: Hard Work, Commitment, Integrity,
Securing Goals and Objectives and Positive Citizenship.
With special concern for inner-city youth and young adults involved
in drugs/youth gang violence, the USIAA provides, "Lifestyle"
educational programs which insures to the best of our ability that
our members secure their human potential.
ACTIVITIES GOALS/OBJECTIVES
Amateur Boxing 25 Daily
Karate 25 Daily
Weight Lifting 20 Daily
Educational Development 10 Daily
25 Wednesday Evenings
u "/1003
v'''' ,)'j
Page 2
ACTIVITIES
GOALS/OBJECTIVES
Membership
1,000 annually
6. Describe the specific program for which funds are requested: (If
you are only requesting funds for general organizational support,
go to question #10).
Question #10
7. Why is the program needed in Chula Vista?
The United States Institute of Amateur Athletics located in
National City and has been serving youngsters and young adults from
our National City facility sense 1987. For the past five years we
have been serving many program participants from Chula Vista, from
our National City facility. In 1992 several Chula Vista parents
asked the USIAA to establish a program in Chula Vista.
The USIAA with the support of Chula Vista parents and members,
established a program located at 1034 3rd Ave.-E., Chula Vista CA.
The USIAA feels that we have struck a nerve in the city of Chula
Vista. Our program uses a non traditional method in dealing with
youngsters and young adults who are "At Risk" or who has had
problems with law enforcement officials.
According to law enforcement statistics youth/gang violence
continues to raise in the city of Chuia Vista. Parents of many "At
Risk" youngsters and young adults have come to know of the USIAA
and how we have effectively channeled emotional feelings of
hostility and aggression in our young people into values of: Hard
Work, Integrity, Discipline and Commitment and produces, highly
motivated, positive members of society.
In short the USIAA has met a need that was brought to our attention
by Chula Vista parents, youngsters and young adults.
8. Who will be
qualifications of
education/training:
providing the service?
key staff and indicate
Briefly
their
describe
level of
The United States Institute of Amateur Athletics, Chief Executive
Officer and Founder is Mr. Robert Coons. Coons has been a
effective administer of three of our nations top non profit
corporations over the past twenty years, those corporations are:
The Young Mens Christian Association (YMCA), Boys and Girls Club of
America, and the Boy Scouts of America. Coons secure his Bachelors
of Science Degree at National University and has several
Page 3
Certifications to include but not limited to: Real Estate Sales,
Liability, Disability Insurance, Hypnosis, and Spiritual
Enrichment.
Coons has been employed as: Program, Physical Education, and
Interim Executive Director of the Jackie Robinson Memorial YMCA in
San Diego, Executive Director at the Boys and Girls Club of San
Bernardino and Wilmington in California and as District Executive
of the San Diego County Boy Scouts of America. Coons has on
several occasions over his employment secured Community Development
Block Grants and has a excellent understanding of the process.
9. Program Budget: Total: $32,000.00
(Include only those expenses directly related to the program for
which funding is requested).
Salaries/Benefits
CDBG
$4,000.00
OTHER FUNDS
Rent/Uti 1 i ties:
$9,600.00
$2,000.00
$800.00
Equipment/Supplies:
Office
Athletic
Educational
$1,800.00
$2,000.00
$3,000.00
Phone
Printing/Advertisement
Postage
Insurance
Awards and Trophies
Transportation
Hotel/Motel
Alarm System
Janitorial
Rentals
$600.00
$3,000.00
$400.00
$500.00
$1,000.00
$1,500.00
$800.00
$400.00
$300.00
$300.00
Subtotals:
$20,400.00
$11,600.00
10. Specify exactly how the CDBG funds will be used:
As noted in the line item budget the majority of CDBG funds will be
used for rent. This will enable our program to keep our doors open
to the street tough youngsters and young adults that we serve.
Page 4
We will secure a part time Receptionist/Secretary with CDBG funds.
The Receptionist/Secretary will be in charge of all: Membership
Records, Attendance, Financial Records, Answering Phones, and
interpreting the goals and objectives of the USIAA to parents and
potential members.
The USIAA shall also need various supplies and equipment to insure
the success of our program. Many of the individuals who are
attracted to the USIAA have cuI tural and peer group pressures
associated with their intellectual development. We have noted
several of our members who do not know how to read, write, or do
simple mathematics. With CDBG funds we hope to secure a computer
and software necessary to help our members: 1. Learn how to
effectively interface with a computers, 2. Learn reading, writing,
and mathematics in a entertaining manner and in a environment that
allows them to be free of peer group pressure and work at their own
pace. 3. We would also secure a bilingual software that will help
our spanish speaking members and parent learn english and many of
our english speaking members and parents learn spanish.
Other office equipment and supplies shall consist of: Fax machine,
copy machine, type writer, filing cabinets and office supplies.
Being a athletic organization the USIAA shall need athletic
equipment and supplies. These supplies shall consist of: Boxing,
Karate, and possible wrestling supplies.
11. Please list the name and amount of other secured or potential
sources of funding for this specifi~ program: San Diego Gas and
Electric Company $1,000.00, Los Angeles Athletic Foundation
$1,000.00, United Way $200.00, Combine Federal Campaign $200.00,
MECRO (City of San Diego Employee Giving Program) $200, Chula Vista
Business Association, Mexico vs USIAA Olympic Style Amateur Boxing
Championship $5,000.00.
12. Do you anticipate needing CDBG funding for this program in
subsequent years? Yes x No
If yes, how much funding will be needed each year ?
1994-95 $ 20,400 1995-96 $ 15,000 1996 -97 $ 10,000
13. Who will be served by your program and what are the boundaries
of your service area? There are no boundaries to our program.
However our immediate service area is within one mile radius of our
complex. Our program is open to youngsters from 8 years of age to
adults. Our program has a special but not exclusive concern for
street tough youth who have been determined as "AT Risk" by school
and juvenile justice officials.
Page 5
14. How do people find out about your pro9ram? How do you do
outreach? Our program has been operating by word of mouth interns
of publicity. We have secured over 150 members in our short
history. If we are able to secure funding this will allow our
program to spend more money on publicity. With funding we will
publicize our program in local elementary, Middle and High Schools
in Chula Vista.
15. Do you assist clients to get to your program site or provide
service out in the community? No. Most of our clients are
youngsters within walking distance of our facility. Lack of
current resources does not allow us to provide transportation to
our facility or provide services throughout the community.
16. For this specific program for which CDBG is requested, estimate
the total number of:
a. Total clients served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94 1,000
1992-93 455
1991-92 50
b. Chula Vista residents served or estimated to be served in:
1993-92 800
1992-93 350
1991-92 50
c. Low-income clients served or estimated to be served in:
(low-income household is defined as follows: Iperson= $23,150;
2person=$26,450; 3person=$29,750: 4person=$33,050)
1993-94 592
1992-93 276
1991-92 50
Page 6
17. What methods will you use to account for the income level and
other demographic information on your clients ?
The United States Institute of Amateur Athletics in National City
has secured Community Development Block Grant in National City as
such we are required to adhere to the same regulations requiring
documentation of our members as here in noted through the Chula
Vista requirements. The USIAA membership registration form
requires members: Name, Address, Phone Numbers, Ethnic Background,
Income Level, Sex, Date of Birth, and number of individuals in
household.
UNITED STATES INSTITUTE OF AMATEUR ATHLETICS
BOARD OF DIRECTORS LIST
PRESIDENT
Mr. Ben Montoya
SDG&E
Olivia Chang
Chiopractic
2101
1iiiIiiiiI' CA. 92112
VICE PRESIDENT
Jacques Dionne
New York Life Insurance Co.
Venoria Lindsay
~
iiIIiiiiII CA 92102
SECRETARY
San Diego,
....
Gillermo "Willie" Duazo
Du azo Inc.
CA 92105
Bob Jones
SDG&E
FINANCE/TREASURE
Michael McCraw
Small Business Dev. Corp.
Lou Lake
.~139
Roger Leftridge
Mit International
DIRECTOR
San Diego CA
Jean Baber
1fJ!//lf"!'921 0 5
Donna Morafcif
~ncepts
~09
Ron Broadus
Memorial Counselor
Greenwood Memorial Park
~A 92112
Smalls
Bonita CA 91902
Lynwood Taylor
PACE Sorts
San Diego, CA 92126
Gilbert and Raul Montes
Attorney At Law
Montes and Montes
San Diego, CA 92101
~e1
~169
Fraunces
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
FUNDING APPLICATION FOR 1993-94
NOTE: THIS APPLICATION IS DUE NO LATER THAN MARCH 1, 1993 AT 5
P.M. AT THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT, 276 FOURTH A VB., CHULA VISTA.
Prognun/ProjectName: Woodlawn Park Community Center
Name of Organization: Woodlawn Park Civic League
Contact Person: Evelvn Gillespie
Title Vo 1 unteer Di rector
Address.
Chula Vista, CA 91911
Telephone
I. Amount of Funding Requested:
$31.000
2. Amount of 1992-93 CDBG Funding:
$20.000
3. If this is an existing program, how many
years has it served Chula Vista residents?
27 years
4. Is this program physically located in Chula Vista?
yes
5. Describe the main goal(s), objectives, and-a.ctivitiesof your organization:
The main objective our agency strives to attain is to expand our capabilities
and to provide improved services in an efficient manner. By teaching self-
esteem and community pride we feel that our goal of helping people to become
self-sufficient will be acheived.
Programs are offered to develop and improve the quality of individual lives
including nutrition, cultural exchanges and social interaction, Juvenile
Diversion, Emergency Food and Clothing, and services to enhance the quality
of life for low income people.
Some highlights of the 1991 programs were:
The Summertime Youth Program, Free Lunches and afternoon snacks for
youth, Cultural Tours for Senior Citizens, The Mondays neighborhood
luncheon for senior citizens, community drop-in center, the annual
Thanksgiving Luncheon, Community Awards Banquet, free Christmas and
New Year Luncheon for over 300 homeless, widows/widowers, servicemen
away from home, and needy families.
In 1992, the number of homeless served in the area increased.
Police and Fire Departments also increased their referrals to
regarding our Emergency Food Program.
Chula Vista
our center
6. Describe the specific program for which funds are requested: (If you are only
requesting funds for general organizational support, go to question # 10).
7. Why is this program needed in Chula Vista?:
8. Who will be providing the services? Briefly describe qualifications of key
staff and indicate their level of educationJtraining:
9. Program Budget: Total: $
(Include only those expenses directly related to the program for which funding is
requested).
CDBG
Salaries/Benefits:
OTHER FUNDS
$
$
Rent/Utilities:
Equipment/Supplies:
Other
Other
Other
Subtotals:
$
$
10. Specify exactly how the CDBG funds will be used:
Community Development Block Grant funds will be expended for insurance,
transportation, program supplies, equipment, utilities, youth and senior
activities, and other expenses.
11. Please list the name and amount of other secured or potential sources of
funding for this specific program:
Recycling
Donations
Fundra i sers
Rental/income
- $ 600
- $ 6,000
- $ 1,500
- $ 7,500
- $15,600
Total
12. Do you anticipate needing CDBG funding for this program in subsequent
years? Yes X No
If yes, how much funding will be needed each year?
1994-95 $ 30,000 1995-96 $ 30,000 1996-97 $ 30,000
13. Who will be served by your program and what are the boundaries of your
service area?
The program serves all ages, Males and Females, from every ethinic
background and culture. The center,js centrally located and within
walking distance of all residents o~'Woodlawn Park and the area south
of Main Street. All service is available without cost.
14. How do people find out about your program? How do you do outreach?
The source of clientele is walk-ins, telephone, referrals from
the police, probations, and San Diego Department of Social Services,
Share, Area Agency on Aging and other local Local Agencies.
15. Do you assist clients to get to your program site or provide services out in the
community?
Our program includes home visitations and in home meals.
16. For this specific program for which CDBG is requested, estimate the total
number of:
a. Total clients served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94 950
1992-93 925
1991-92 925
b. Chula Vista residents served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94 850
1992-93 832
1991-92 832
c. Low-income clients served or estimated to be served in:
(low-income household is defined as follows: 1person=$23,150; 2person=$26,450;
3person =$29,750; 4person =$33,050)
1993-94 900
1992-93 879
1991-92 879
17. What methods will you use to account for the income level and other
demographic information on your clients?
Board of Directors and Advisory Committee
Marie F. Thompson
Fannie McFarl in
Synetha Anderson
Evelyn L. Gillespie
Pre<,?j dent
Vice President
Secreta ry /Treasurer
Vol. Project Director
Advisory Committee
Julia Hassler
Consuela Garcia
Gloria Bowen
Nellie Galberth
Hosea Battle
Sanita Rei d
Norma Mi 11 er
Julia Rosales
Pamela Tipp
Le il a Chea theam
Vivian Mosely
PLEASE ATTACH THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
a) A PROGRAM BROCHURE OR FLYER (if you have one)
b) A CURRENT LIST OF YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS (one page)
c) A COMPLETE LIST OF CURRENT SOURCES OF REVENUE (one page)
BUDGET
Transportation
Insurance
Equipment/Supplies
Utilities
Youth & Senior Activities
Postage
Gasoline & oil (for Project vehicle)
Repairs & Maintenance
License & Permits
Printing & Publication
Rubbish Disposal
Total
ATTACHMENT
$ 3,500
$ 9,500
$ 3,850
$ 3,600
$ 4,500
$ 250
$ 1,200
$ 3,600
$ 500
$ 300
$ 200
$31.000
---1.....,.,
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
FUNDING APPLICATION FOR 1993-94
NOTE: THIS APPLICATION IS DUE NO LATER THAN MARCH 1, 1993 AT 5
P.M. AT THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT, 276 FOURTH AVE., CHUU VISTA.
Program/Project Name:
Child Abuse Treatment Services
Name of Organization: YMCA FAMILY STRESS CENTER - YMCA of San Diego County
Contact Person:
Gail N. Edwards, Ph.D. Title
Director
Address:-
Telephone
I. Amount of Funding Requested:
$ 22 ,400
2. Amount of 1992-93 CDBG Funding:
$ 20,000
3. If this is an existing program, how many
years has it served Chula Vista residents?
1 A years
4. Is this program physically located in Chula Vista?
yes
5. Describe the main goal(s), objectives, and activities of your organization:
The mission of the YMCA Family Stress Center is to prevent and treat child
abuse. The goal of the Child Abuse Treatment Services (CATS) program is to
treat a minimum of 700 children and 575 adults each year, and to provide
child abuse prevention education through parenting classes and community
education. Treatment services include individual child and adult psychotherapy,
family counseling, and group treatment.
While child abuse may involve emotional, physical or sexual abuse, the majority
of Family Stress Center clients are dealing with issues of sexual abuse. The
English and Spanish chapters of Parents United and Daughters/Sons United, sponsored
by Family Stress Center, provide weekly treatment groups for families dealing
with incestuous child abuse. Other treatment groups are provided for adult male
offenders of sexual abuse, and the Survivors' Network for adults abused as children.
The Child Abuse Prevention Foundation sponsors IILos Ninos Bien Educadosll, a
parenting class for Spanish speaking parents. The Foundation also contributes
towards the salary of the supervisor of Mexican interns from CETYS, a Mexican
university in Tijuana.
The extensive training program for interns, who each volunteer a total of twenty
hours per week, greatly increases the number of clients who receive services at
Family Stress Center. Additional professionals from the community volunteer their
time to facilitate the many treatment groups.
6. Describe the specific program for which funds are requested: (If you are only
requesting funds for general organizational support, go to question # 10).
The Child Abuse Treatment Services program provides individual, family, and
group treatment services for abused children and members of their families.
Each child and adult may receive a variety of services each week. Most of
these clients have income at or below the povery level, therefore most pay no
fee for the services they receive. Family reunification is the goal,whenever
possible, for those families separated due to child sexual abuse.
All services in the CATS program are provided in English and Spanish.
7. Why is this program needed in Chula Vista?:
There are no other agencies devolted exclusively to the issues of child abuse
treatment and prevention in the South Bay. Family Stress Center's bilingual
staff and convenient location increases the likelihood that Chula Vista
families will receive the help they need.
Currently four Chula Vista Children, ages 6 to 12, are on the waiting list for
treatment of physical abuse, and nine children, ages 3 to 14, wait for treatment
of sexual abuse. These numbers increase when you consider the number of family
members also in need of treatment.
8. Who will be providing the services? Briefly describe qualifications of key
staff and indicate their level of education/training:
All key staff are licensed psychotherapists or are license eligible. All have
had extensive training in issues of child abuse, and all participate in on-going
training at Family Stress Center. Key staff includes:
Gail N. Edwards, Ph.D., licensed psychologist; agency director.
Cynthia Bernee, M.A., licensed marriage, family and child counselor.
Barbara Daub, M.S., licensed marriage, family and child counselor.
Scott Shaffer, M.A., licensed marriage, family and child counselor.
Bobbie Paul, M.A., licensed marriage, family and child counselor.
9. Program Budget: Total: $ 473,529
(Include only those expenses directly related to the program for which funding is
requested).
Salaries/Benefits:
CDBG
$ 20,000
$
OTHER FUNDS
346,682
Rent/Utilities:
2,400
45,202
Equipment/Supplies:
18,047
Other insurance
3,299
G. O. Support.
Other
37,899
Other
Subtotals:
$ 22,400
$
451,129
10. Specify exactly how the CDBG funds will be used:
$20,000 of the CDBG funds will be used towards the personnel costs of
the counseling staff for the Child Abuse Treatment Services program.
$2,400 of the CDBC funds will be used towards the rental costs of the
three buildings leased at 571 Third Avenue, Chula Vista, CA.
11. Please list the name and amount of other secured or potential sources of
funding for this specific program:
San Diego County General Funds
Child Abuse Prevention Foundation Grant
Events/Donations
Fees/Insurance
$254,735
20,000
96,394
80,000
(est. )
(est. )
12. Do you anticipate needing CDBG funding for this program in subsequent
years? Yes xx No
If yes, how much funding will be needed each year?
1994-95 $ 25,000 1995-96 $ 27,500 1996-97 $ 30,000
13. Who will be served by your program and what are the boundaries of your
service area?
All residents of San Diego County are eligible for services through
Family Stress Center. Because Family Stress Center is located in the
South Bay, the majority of clients come from Chula Vista and the
surrounding communities, including the City of San Diego.
14. How do people find out about your program? How do you do outreach?
Approximately 80% of clients are referred through Child Protective
Services of the Department of Social Services. Other clients are
referred by law enforcement, other social service agencies, or are
self-referred.
Family Stress Center staff is involved in community coalitions, including
the South Bay Directors' Meeting, the San Diego Community Child Abuse
Coordinating Council, the South Bay Domestic Violence Task Force, and others.
15. Do you assist clients to get to your program site or provide services out in the
community?
Family Stress Center is located on a major bus route and is equidistant
between the 5 and 805 freeways (approxiamtely one mile from each.) We are
also one mile from the Trolley Station. Some clients ride bicycles to
the Center. Therapists work with social workers to secure bus tokens for
eligible clients through the Department of Social Services.
Many Family Stress Center groups are held at community sites, including
schools, churches and hospitals.
16. For this specific program for which CnBG is requested, estimate the total
number of:
a. Total clients served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94 1274
1992-93 1274
1991-92 1117
b. Chula Vista residents served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94 250*
1992-93 250*
1991-92 374
*Additional CV residents attend the Psychotherapy Services Program and parenting
c. Low-income clients served or estimated to be served in: classes.
(low-income household is defined as follows: 1 person =$23, 150; 2person =$26,450;
3person = $29,750; 4person = $33,050)
1993-94 22';
1992-93 225
1991-92 350
17. What methods will you use to account for the income level and other
demographic information on your clients?
A formal intake application is completed for each client. This includes
an assessment of client/family income, and an assessment of fee based on
a sliding scale, according to Federal pove~ guidelines. Clients sign a
fee agreement, whether or not they a~e being charged a fee. Most clients
in the CATS program do not pay for the services they receive.
The intake application also includes the demographic information required
by our contracts with the County of San Diego and with Chula Vista. The
CATS program assistant maintains all data on a computer.
PLEASE AITACH THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
a) A PROGRAM BROCHURE OR FLYER (if you have one)
b) A CURRENT LIST OF YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS (one page)
c) A COMPLETE LIST OF CURRENT SOURCES OF REVENUE (one page)
FAMILY STRESS CENTER
Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment
571 Third Avenue. Chu1a Vista, CA 91910. (619) 691-1331
FACT SHEET
"HELPING ABUSED KIDS HEAL"
The YMCA Family stress Center in Chula Vista is a non-profit child
abuse prevention and treatment agency which began in 1975.
Services are available to all residents of San Diego County. The
Family stress Center mission is to prevent and treat child abuse
through comprehensive prevention programs and treatment
involvement with child victims of abuse and their families.
The San Diego
100,000 calls
will be victims
County Child Abuse Hotline receives approximately
each year! Nationwide over one million children
of abuse this year.
HOW FAMILY STRESS CENTER HELPS
Family Stress
1000 children
in parenting
abuse. Nearly
Center staff provides counseling services for nearly
and 1000 adults each year. other adults participate
classes and groups for adult survivors of childhood
all services are available in English and Spanish.
This large number of clients receive services due to the
dedication and professional expertise of Family Stress Center's
staff of licensed therapists, psychology and counseling interns,
and professional volunteers. An outstanding support staff insures
the continuance of client service delivery.
SUMMARY OF SERVICES
Ckild Abuse Treatment Services (CATS) The CATS program, primarily
funded by the County of San Diego, provides a variety of
treatment programs to help children and adults deal with problems
resulting from physical and/or sexual abuse. Services include
individual child and adult psychotherapy, family therapy, and
group treatment. Groups include English and Spanish chapters of
Parents United and Daughters/Sons united for clients who have
experienced the trauma of child sexual abuse within their
families, and the Survivors' Network for adults abused as
childcen.
Psychotherapy Services Program This program provides child abuse
treatment services for children and families who have insurance or
who are eligible for the victim compensation program administered
by the California State Board of Control.
Bicultural Parenting Program The Bicultural Parenting Program
provides a series of parenting classes to assist parents with
their difficult job of raising their children.
UCHARD C. BIGELOW
'(MCt- Treasurer
Mar'<='J,ng Partner
Ar:h~' /..ndersen Company
DIRK BROEKEMA, JR.
yrll1Ct.. V,ce CtlClifman
Presld,::,n!
BO'IIE:'o" Corporation
ANN BURR
YMCA Vice Chairwoman
Pres.cent
South :.'estern Cable TV
PAUL BUSS
ExE:c..~'le Vice President
OI:'/(:r tJ1cMdlan
MILTON R. CHEVERTON
Chii;r~,an of the Board
Cre.'<;r.on & Associates
TERRY CHURCHILL
Area ,'ce President
Pac': Bel!
"INCENT R_ CIRUZZI
'.'~C.:: Cl' Ch.:lIfman
FREDERICK W. CLOSE. M.D.
Or;rC,:Jeclc Surgeon
RICHARD A. COLLATO
Pres :::e,,: & CEO
Y\iC:- .)' San D ego COL;n'\
STEVE CONNER
Rea ::'O':a;e Imestme.'11S
JAMES M. COWLEY
Pa:""::--",'
Co:. '2. & Ch,cester
SID CRAIG
Ct,; r-',:!" of the BOdld
Je~,~,. Cra'Q V\'l'IOl1t Loss Cen:rl'
NEIL DERROUGH
PrE'S ::(':1: & General Md!l39C1
K~SD Channel 39
GLEN ESTELL
Srar'.c~ Manager
"
RON L FOWLER
Pres :::e~'
:,h~s...~ D S:' ,bu: :lg
YMCA OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
HARRY O. FRELS
Real E Slate 8roker
ROBERT B. McLEOD
YMCA VIce ChaIrman
PresIdent
Newland Group, Inc
LYLE GABRIELSON
President
Rick E nglneefing Company
RICHARD L. MANNING
Vice Presldenl, Public RC!<lll()Ils
San Diego Gas & ElectriC
STEVEN F. GOETZ
Chle! FinanCial QU,cer
Caterpillar/Solar Turbines
JOSEPH MARTINEZ
President
Martrnez. Cutf! & McArdle
ROBERT H. GOLDSMITH
PreSident & CEO
Aohr Industries, Inc
RICHARD W. MEADS
Chairman & CEO
Knoth & Meads Company
CLIFFORD W. GRAVES
YMCA Secretary
President
Grigsby. Graves
BRUCE N. MOORE
Executive Partner
Barney & Barney Insurance
WARNER L. HARRAH
Senior Vice President &
Manager (retired)
Tlcor Tille Insurance
JOSE MUNOZ
President.
Van Camp Seafood Co Inc
KARLA C. HERTZOG
Preslden:
TOPS
Total Personnel ServICl'
PERCY MYERS
ChMman YMCA Board of Governors
Ge~eral DynarTlICs
Elec,rorllCS D,VISIO:1
NORMAN HICKEY
Chief Administrative Otflccr
San Diego County
JOSIAH L. NEEPER
Cra:lman of the Boar(;
Gr3v Cary Ames & Frye
MURRAY H. HUTCHISON
Chairman 01 the Board
IT Corporation
THOMAS F. NOON
President
Shea Homes
PAT HYNDMAN
President
ihe Executive COr'lmlltec
OSCAR PADILLA
YMCA Vice 012:lrrn3r'.
Pres:aenl
Oscar Padilla insurance
GORDON M. JOHNS
Partner
Delolt!e & Touche
THOMAS PAYZANT
Superintendent
San Diego Unified Crty SChools
HUBERT l. KALTENBACH
V,ce Chairman
Cooley Nc\\"spa.pcr~)
RAYMOND W. PEIRCE
International Management Consultanf
JAMES G. KENDRICK
PreSident & CI1;WfTldl1
(retired)
W T Granl Cornp3ny
ALAN R. PERRY
YMCil.. A~;S:o;\;Hlt S!?CH'l.lIV
I-\:!orney
Musick Peelcr 8. (l(lrfc1\
AL KERCHEVAL
President
Kercheval Engineers
DAVID J. PRIMUTH
YMCA Vice Chair
President & CEO
JWPWesl
DAVID E. LLOYD
Presloen'
Sa\' Co;y fl.1arlne
JAMES H. REED
Senior Vice Presloen:
(re:,rcol
A 0 Reed & CO:1~;)an',
PAUL K. RICHEY
YMCA Immediate Past Chairman
President
PKA ASSOCiates
SYLVIA RIOS
President
First Security Mortgage
DONALD ROON
President
The Roon founoatlon
MARGE ROULETTE
Director WD-40 and
Scripps CliniC
DOUGLAS F. SAWYER
Senior Vice Presloent
Securrty Pacific
National Bank
JAMES A. SIMPSON
YMCA Chairman of the Board
Presldenl
Trade Service Corporation
HAROLD B. STARKEY
Senior Executive Vice Pres'ue:"
Coast Savings & LOCl.n
ROBERT A. T JOSVOLD
Senior Vice PreSident
Bank of Ameflca
ROBERT E. TOWNSEND
PreSident
Townsend Lincoln Mercury
GILBERT VASQUEZ
PreSident
Industrial Data L;nk
Corporation
ROBERT WATKINS
Managing Director
Russell. ReynoldS ASSOCIates
DOUGLAS P. WILSON
PreSident
CarlerIVVdson
CMf Asset M:"JnClgemerlt he
WALTER J. ZABLE
YMCA Vice Ctlalrfl1i;lfl
Oliillman of the Board & CEO
Cub,c Corpor:"Jtlon
PAUL A. ZECOS
Management Consultant
(MCA FAMILY STRESS CENTER
1993/94
~UNDING SOURCES:
CAP
,overnment Contract
254,735
:APF Grant
:DBG Funds
=ees/Ins/Misc
rOTAL REVENUE:
254,735
AGENCY REVENUE - CDBG FUNDS APPLICATION
FEE/INS CDBG
22,400
80,000
80,000 22,400
BICULPAR GENERAL TOTAL
20,000
20,000
96,394
96,394
254,735
20,000
22,400
176,394
473,529
STOR.Y
rf,,-
. A S'o..I
P
('""p/'C" tt,......f ~f...--I ""c '.
~~
#-- Ho~
-J..vu r'- r /(~
~~ ..../
~~
~~~
ST1FsS C~NTEI{
YMe,q FAMIL.Y "/'12.
,
~_!,~
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
FUI\'DING APPLICATION FOR 1993-94
NOTE: THIS APPLICATION IS DUE NO LATER THAN MARCH 1, 1993 AT 5
P.M. AT THE CIIT OF CHULA VISTA, COMMUNIIT DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT, 276 FOURTH AVE., CHULA VISTA.
Program/Project Name: Battered Women's Services Domestic Violence
Treatment Program
Name of Organization: YWCA of San Dieqo County
Contact Person: Cordelia Ryan Title Director
Address:
Telephone
1. Amount of Funding Requested:
$10,000
2. Amount of 1992-93 CDBG Funding:
$ ') 000
3. If this is an existing program, how many
years has it served Chula Vista residents?
1 3 years
4. Is this program physically located in Chula Vista?
Partially
5. Describe the main goal(s), objectives, and ;Ictivities of your organization:
The primary goal of Battered Women's Services is to end domestic
violence and maladaptive behavior in intimate relationships.
Objectives include:
To provide safe emergency shelter and support services for women
and children.
To increase the victims' understanding of the causes of domestic
violence in the larger context as well as in their own lives.
To assist the abuser in examining and understanding his violent
behavior as a means of controlling his partner's feelings.
thoughts. and actions.
Activities include:
24 hour hotline
Safe emergency shelter
Women's support groups
Children's Program
Legal Support Services
Counseling Services
Domestic Violence Treatment Program
6. Describe the specific program for which funds are requested:
(If you are only requesting funds for general organizational
support, got to question # 10).
YWCA Battered Women's Services Counseling Services includes a
DOMESTIC VIOLENCE TREATMENT PROGRAM for court ordered
perpetrators. Approximately 350 male perpetrators and 30 female
perpetrators attend a year-long group counseling program which
focuses on recognizing the tactics of power and control and aims at
replacing violent behavior with alternative healthy behaviors.
Funds are requested to run 2 Spanish speaking male perpetrator
groups in Chula vista.
7. Why is this program needed in Chula vista?:
Approximately 35% of our clients are referred through the
South Bay courts. They are residents of Chula vista and
neighboring communities. In 1992, 2797 domestic violence incidents
(misdemeanors and felonies) were reported in Chula vista.
8. Who will be
qualifications of
education/training:
providing
key staff
the services?
and indicate
Briefly describe
their level of
The groups are facilitated by Jesus Zarazosa, M.A. He has
been trained to run domestic violence treatment groups using the
Duluth Model and other psychoeducational therapeutic techniques.
Mr. Zarazosa is bi-lingual and bi-cultural. Supervision is
provided by our clinical director, Julia Ritzo, M.F.C.C.
9. Program Budget: Total: $ 24.650
(Include only those expenses directly related to the program for
which funding is requested).
CDBG OTHER FUNDS
salaries/Benefits:
$ 8,300
$ 14,400
Rent/utilities:
1,250
100
Equipment/Supplies:
200
Other printinq
100
Other Postaqe
150
Other Insurance:
150
Subtotals:
$ 10,000
$ 14,650
10. specify exactly how the CDBG funds will be used:
A) Salaries: Facilitation of two 1 1/2 hour groups per week
B) Salaries: Supervision of facilitators and administration of
program
C) Rent: Space at Boys and Girls Club of Chula vista
D) utilities: Telephone contact with clients and courts
E) Equipment: Instructional tapes in Spanish
F) Printing and Postage: Duplication and processing of court
paper, client file and evaluation
G) Insurance: General Liability
11. Please list the name and amount of other secured or potential
sources of funding for this program:
Participants in the DOMESTIC VIOLENCE TREATMENT PROGRAM
currently pay a $600 fee for the year long program. During 1993-
1994, two groups in Chula vista should generate approximately
$14,400.
12. Do you anticipate needing CDGB funding for this program in
subsequent years? Yes X No
If yes, how much funding will be needed each year?
1993-94 $ 10.000 1994-95 $ 10.000 1995-96 $ 10.000 We hope
to decrease outside funding needs by generating increased client
fees.
13. Who will be served by your program or organization and what
are the boundaries of your service area?
YWCA Battered Women I s Services provides comprehensive services
within San Diego County. The target population for the specific
program will be Spanish speaking males in Chula vista and nearby
communities who have been court ordered into a DOMESTIC VIOLENCE
TREATMENT PROGRAM.
14. How do people find out about your program? How do you do
outreach?
Clients in the DOMESTIC VIOLENCE TREATMENT PROGRAM are
referred by the court and find out about the program through the
court. They attend an orientation session which explains the goals
and structure of the program.
Outreach is an on-going acti vi ty of YWCA Battered Women's
Services. It consists of community presentations, distributions of
material at public events and to other service providers, extensive
linkage with other organizations and opportunities for volunteers
to work with Battered Women's Services.
15. Do you assist clients to get to your program site or provide
services out in the community?
Clients attend an intake session at our Pacific Beach office
and an orientation session at our downtown office. Treatment
groups are currently run at these two sites, as well as in Chula
vista. We do not provide transportation to these services.
16. For this specific program for which CDBG is requested,
estimate the total number of:
a. Total clients served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94
1992-93
1991-92
BWS
6400
6420
6491
DVTP
650
700
775
b. Chula vista residents served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94
1992-93
1991-92
625
630
632
65
70
78
c. Low-income clients served or estimated to be served in:
(low-income is defined as follows: 1person=$23,150;
2person=$26,450; 3person=$29,750; 4person=$33,050)
1993-94
1992-93
1991-92
6100
6100
6149
611
658
728
17. What methods will you use to account for the income level and
other demographic information on your clients?
The service provider fills out an individual intake form for
all clients admitted to Battered Women's Services. The counseling
coordinator is responsible for all intakes on court ordered
offenders in the DOMESTIC VIOLENCE TREATMENT PROGRAM. The Intake
Information form contains Name, Address, Zip Code, Gender, D.O.B.,
Age, Income Level, Ethnicity, Referral Source and Disability
Status, as well as domestic violence and other related history.
At the end of each fiscal year, the demographic information on
all clients is compiled into a summary for submission to united
Way.
PLEASE ATTACH THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
a) A PROGRAM BROCHURE OR FLYER (if you have one)
b) A CURRENT LIST OF YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS (one page)
c) A COMPLETE LIST OF CURRENT SOURCES OF REVENUE (one page)
ATTACHMENT C
CURRENT SOURCES OF REVENUE
YWCA of San Diego County
Battered Women's Services
1) County of San Diego, Department of Social services
Community Action partnership
2) United Way
3) Program Fees
4) My sister's Closet Thrift Shop
5) child Abuse Prevention Foundation Grant
6) Donations and Contributions from the community
LINDA CHESNUT 1/94
FINANCE CHAIR
DIANE DEGAILLEZ 1/95
MICKI FARRELL 1/95
IRENE FREEMAN 1/95 -.
JOAN MARTIN (*E) 2/93 ......
CAMPAIGN CHAIR
F
EUPHEMIA NG 2/95
ASHLEY PHILLIPS 2/95
(LEAVE OF ABSENCE)
PEGGY PRICE (*E) 2/93
SECRETARY
JULIE SHAKE (*E) 1/94
TREASURER
YWCA OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
ROSTER
FEBRUARY 1993
NAME
ADDRESS
TERM
ELVIA AGUILAR
1/93
JANICE BROWN
1/94
PHONE
Alternatives
to
Violence:
choices:
xerclse your
. Recognize your anger
Instead of exploding in
violence.
. Take a Time-Out by
walking or running
until your anger
has cooled and
communication is
possible.
. Call a friend.
. Call BWS at 234-3164.
,
Group
Process
e use the
group process as a model
for the way you relate to
others in your life. Thc
group enables a man to
see he is notthc only
one with problems of
violence. Men help each
other learn new ways
of solving conflict
and identifying and
expressing their
emotions, especially
anger. The group also
servcs as a way of
increasing a man's
support system.
Facilitators of the group
proccss are men and
women trained in the
issues of domestic
violence.
\
ho's
appropriate:
Those involved in
relationship violence,
either verbal, emotional,
physical or sexual.
tl'::
Fees: Drop in-Wper
session.
Court-ordered-fixed
rate.
Confidentiality:
BWS respects your
confidentiality. You can
be assured that your
privacy will be respected.
\
THERE IS
AN ALTERNATIVE -
BATTERED WOMEN'S
SERVICES
OUR PURPOSE IS...
. To serve the needs of obused women and
their children who must escape a danger-
ous home situation by offering them a safe
shelter that provides an environment of
peace, empathy and emotional support.
. To help women learn to use personal and
community resources and to develop pians
of action for their futures,
. To network with other community organiza-
tions and individuals to provide education,
increase awareness and seek realistic solu-
tions to the problem.
. To assist men in stopping physical violence
and establishing non-abusive relationships
with women.
. To support children from violent homes by
recognizing how the violence has affected
them and providing them with an opportu-
nity to learn about living without vioieRce.
. To address the probiem of substance abuse
when it occurs In families where violence is
also present.
CASA DE PAZ (House of Peace)
. Shelter for battered women and their
chlidren
Maximum stay 30 days
Alcohol and drug-free
. Meals
. Individual and group counseling
. Children's program, inciuding accredited
schOOl classes
. An environment that offers an opportunity
to reflect. get in touch with strengths, be-
come aware of options, create a support
system outside the temporary residence
LEGAL SUPPORT PROGRAM
270-4501 . 239-2341
2550 Garnet Avenue
Pacific Beach, CA 92109
. Legal ,nformation, advocacy, and coun-
seling, clvli or criminal processes by tele-
phone
. Free on-site legal consultation by S.D.
Volunteer Lawyer program
. Referral for Restraining Order Clinics and
sliding scale family law attorneys
. Social service referral
. Community education, liaison and publiC
policy advocacy
SUPPORT GROUPS
Drop-in groups for women and men in violent
relationships. Call Hotline for time and loca-
tions.
COUNSELING
. Individuals and couples, by appointment
only, 234-3164
VOLUNTEER PROGRAM
. Eleven weekly training sessions to familiarize
volunteers with issues, agencies, services and
resources
. Crisis Intervention Training to provide skills for
understanding and assisting persons In criSIS
. Choice of service activities including hotline
and shelter counseling, children's services,
fundraislng, odministrative and clerical
support, speakers bureau and thrift shop
FUNDING
The San Diego YWCA Battered Women's
Services are financially supported by: Stote of
Calif. Domestic Violence Funds (administered
through San Diego County Dept. of Social Serv-
Ices), United Way, Crime Victims Fund and
contributions from concerned individuals and
private foundations.
Fees for services are based on ability to pay
Donations of funds, supplies, and equipment
are gratefully accepted. For more information,
piease call 239-2342,
ThiS pamphlet provided by a donation from
San Diego Firefighters Local 145.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT AND COMMUNITY PROJECTS
A. Otay Neighborhood Revitalization Program
B. South Chula Vista Library construction
C. Parkway Complex Renovation
D. ADA Modifications
E. Otay Park Renovation
F. ADA Curb Cuts
G. Fourth Avenue/Del Rey High School to Orange Avenue
H. Main Library- Re-Roof
1. Nature Interpretive Center Road Surfacing
1. B&H Community Appearance Program
K. SBCS Community Development Program
L. SBCS Graffiti Education
M. C. V. Elementary School District Playground- Mueller
N. Feaster
O. Harborside
P. Vista Square
Q. Otay
R. YMCA Aquatics Facility
S. Border Environmental Zone Coordinator
T. Biotech Zone ErR
U. Fair Housing Program
V. C.V. Human Services CouncilsW. Regional Task Force on Homeless
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM DETAIL
CIPNO.: RD-204 INITIAL SCHEDULE: 92193/
TITLE: Otay Neighborhood Ravitalizatlon Program DEPARTMENT: Community Development
COMMUNITY PLAN AREA: MontgomeKy PROJECT MANAGER: Miguel Z. Tapia
TOTAL
APPROPRIA TlONS
PROJ ECT THRU CURRENT FY 1993-94 FY 1994-95 FY 1995-96 FY 199&-97 FY 1997.98
COST ESTIMATES: TOTAL YEAR
I. Preparatory Planning $40,000 $40,000 $0
II. Land Acquisition 0 0 0
III. Design 37,783 37,783 0
IV. Construction 864,211 614,981 249,230
V. General Administration 98,035 73,465 24,570
TOTALS .....ieee. $766,229 $273,800 $0 $0 $0 $0
FINANCING SOURCES:
COSG $695,750 $421,950 $273,800
LOW/MOD 344,279 344,279 0
T= ','
FINANCING TOTALS $766,229 $273,800 $0 $0 $0 $0
Description: Funds will provide for the construction of basic public improvements including sidewalks, curbs,
gutters and street lights in the Otay Town Community.
Justification: The requested funding represents the third and final implementation phase of the Neighborhood
Revitaiization Program (NRP), The goals and objectives of the program are to provide the Otay Community with
needed infrastructure,
Scheduting: Phase II currentiy underway, Design and construction of Phase III scheduled for FY 93/94.
Operating Budqet Effect: Minimal.
WPC F:'t1OME\WPOC1P\RO.204 (REV. Ap-II, un)
~s
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM DETAIL
CIPNO.: LB.125 INITIAL SCHEDULE: 92/95/97
TITLE: New Area Library - Montgomery/South Chula Vista DEPARTMENT: Ubrary
COMMUNITY PLAN AREA: Montgomery PROJECT MANAGER: David Palmar
TOTAL
APPROPRIATIONS
PROJECT THRU CURRENT FY 1993-94 FY 1994-95 FY 1995-96 FY 1995-97 FY 1997.98
COST ESTIMATES: TOTAL YEAR
I. Preparatory Planning $114,500 $114,500 $0 $0 $0 $0
II. Land Acquisition 2,285,000 2,285,000 0 0 0 0
III. Design 859,890 859,890 0 0 0 0
IV. Construction 12,093,650 314,470 8,161,751 1,410,929 1,103,250 1,103,250
V. General Administration 92,370 92,370 0 0 0 0
, ~Q .
TOTALS $3,666,230 $8,161,751 $1,410,929 $1,103,250 $1,103,250 $0
FINANCING SOURCES:
GFCAPOUT $114,500 $114,500 $0 $0 $0 $0
GRANT 6,748,000 314,000 6,434,000 0 0 0
DIFLBRY (36.4%) 4,748,710 668,230 1,349,555 1,119,005 805,960 805,960
CDBG 3,172,620 2,502,500 378,196 291,924 0 0
RCT 67,000 67,000 0 0 0 0
UNSPEC 594,580 0 0 0 297,290 297,290
FINANCING TOTALS $3,666,230 $8,161,751 $1,410,929 $1,103,250 $1,103,250 $0
Description: Design and construction of 37,000 sq. ft. library located at 4th and Orange.
Justification: This project implements a phasa of the library Master Pian, accepted April 30, 1987. In April 1991 , the library
was awarded $6.7 million in Bond Act funds by tha Califomia State library to construct the library.
Scheduling: land acquisition was completed in FY 91/92. Design is scheduled to be completed in FY 92/93. Construction
is scheduled to begin in FY 93/94 and be completed in FY 94/95, Foundation book collection acquisition to begin in FY 94/95
and be completed in FY 97/98.
Operatina Budaet Effect:
Estimated positions
29 FTE
29 FTE
~
$469,930
$939,855
Non'P8~onnel
$301,900
$003,800
FY 94195 (6 months only)
FY95/96
WPC F:~OME\WPCICIND.12S {REV ,.t,pot 2'3. l'f'3}
,
'.
--
-
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM DETAIL
CIPNO.: PR-162 INITIAL SCHEDULE: 93/94/
TITLE: Parkway Complex Renovation.. Phase I DEPARTMENT: Parks and Recreation
COMMUNITY PLAN AREA: Conlral Chula Vlsla PROJECT MANAGER: Gragg HanaonlSunny Shy
TOTAL
APPROPRIATIONS
PROJECT THRU CURRENT FY 1993-94 FY 1994-95 FY 1995-96 FY 1996-97 FY 1997.98
COST ESTIMATES: TOTAL YEAR
I. Preperatory Planning $4,531 $0 $4,531
II. Land Acquisition 0 0 0
III, Design 88,991 75,430 13,561
IV. Construction 557,n4 0 557,n4
V. General Administration 11,517 0 11,517
TOTALS ~13 $75,430 $587,383 $0 $0 $0 $0
FINANCING SOURCES:
PAD $374,740 $75,430 $299,310
CDSG 288,073 0 288,073
FINANCING TOTALS ~ $75,430 $587,383 $0 $0 $0 $0
Description: The project provides for the first of a two phase renovation of Parkway Complex. Phase I will
provide for renovation of the gymnasium and pool restroom/dressing rooms including heating, ventilation and
plumbing. All ADA signage and accessibility accommodations will be made during this phase.
.'~~-~~
.. .t II
'" .
-'
,
Justification: Renovation of the gym and pool areas will provide ADA compliance and will reduce concerns
raised by the County health Department. These facilities generate revenues in special interest classes, day camp,
leagues and rentals. Phase I reflects the priorities of the Memorial Park Master Plan.
..
Operating Budget Effect: The maintenance needs of the laciltty should be signrticantly reduced including time
lor cleaning and ongoing repairs. Minimal energy costs will be incurred for the heating of the facilities. .
..
>-
..
"
..
.
.
.
tn-.
I I~...
"'
"
z
w~lrr-''''I(''''''':'"i:''';''
> . ~ r.r.P"_...rf~';1 r;-o'.",,."').';"I-"';r-
c(f;.r~lI':~'>.~l'" "..,..r~cr_! '~,iz.'~'f7)o., ~:r
1"{I~'r' IotE"'ORIA~ PARK;
,,,,.;~-,..,.r'''''''''''''''''''''''I-''!'
I A_" 'J' -,.,.....''''..........:',: ~ ''';f '(-~.. 1r:.;f",
~IY"
:E .~ : : . I : : : . I . '. . ~
~ :
SchedUling: Design is underway for FY 92/93; construction is scheduled to begin FY 93/94.
. . --
...
. .,.-
01'.-__
".
., ~-
~
11111 Il" ,'I
· II 1'1
'~-~ I II
, I
NPC F:\tl~8WPC\CIP\PFl.1e2 (REV. Maldl S, lU3)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM DETAIL
CIP NO.: GG.144 INITIAL SCHEDULE: 94/951
TITLE: ADA Modifications. PH 1 DEPARTMENT: Building and Housing
COMMUNITY PLAN AREA: Citywlda PROJECT MANAGER: Ken Larsen
TOTAL
APPROPRIATIONS
PROJECT THRU CURRENT FY 1993.94 FY 1994-95 FY 1995-96 FY 1996-97 FY 1997.98
COST ESTIMATES: TOTAL YEAR
I. Preparatory Planning . $12,000 $2,700 $9,300
II. Land Acquisition 0 0 0
III. Design 13,000 2,900 10,100
IV. Construction 117,800 27,000 90,800
V. General Administration 14,300 3,400 10,900
TOTALS ii$''''^~ $0 $36,000 $121,100 $0 $0 $0
FINANCING SOURCES:
CoBG $36,000 $36,000 $0
PAD 58,000 0 58,000
RCT 63,100 0 63,100
FINANCING TOTALS I.. ...... .... $157,100 $0 $36,000 $121,100 $0 $0 $0
Description: Requested funds will provide for the modification to c~y facilities as required by the Americans with
Disabilities Act making them accessible to individuals w~h disabilities. Modifications include signage, doors, and
public access routes.
Scheduling: Design and construction are scheduled for FY 93/94 and FY 94/95.
Operating Budget Effect: None.
Justification: This project represents Phase I of the City's ellorts to comply with the Federally mandated law.
\We F:IHCM&'IWPC'.cIP\O().l44 (REV. ""'" e, tit'll
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM DETAIL
CIPNO.: PR-133 INITIAL SCHEDULE: 94/ /
TITLE: Renovation. Otay Park DEPARTMENT: Peri<:. and Recreetlon
COMMUNITY PLAN AREA: Montgomery PROJECT MANAGER: Martin Schmidt
TOTAL
APPROPRiATIONS
PROJECT THRU CURRENT FY 1993-94 FY 1994-95 FY 1995-96 FY 1996-97 FY 1997-99
COST ESTIMATES: TOTAL YEAR
I. Preparatory Planning $33,000 $33,000 $0 $0 $0
II. land Acquisition 0 0 0 0 0
III. Design 124,800 124,800 0 0 0
IV. Construction 1,135,700 0 535,700 300,000 300,000
V. General Administration 129,350 15,000 54,350 30,000 30,000
TOTALS $1,422,850 $0 $172,800 $590,050 $330,000 $330,000 $0
FINANCING SOURCES:
CDBG $1,422,850 $172,800 $590,050 $330,000 $330,000
FINANCING TOTALS $1,422,850 $0 $172,800 $590,050 $330,000 $330,000 $0
Description: Renovation of Olay Park will Include entering Into a Joint Planning Agreement (JPA) w~h the Chula
Vista Elementary School District to develop adjoining school grounds as an addition to the neighborhood park.
Renovation will Include new Irrigation, play apparatus, picnic shattar, sport fields, restrooms, landscaping, park
security lighting, community stage, and a running and jogging track. The Department would determine the
feasibility of s~lng a recreation center at this stte as well.
JUs1~icatlon: The Montgomery area is severely deficient in the amount of parkland available. By utilizing the
school grounds, an add~ional 4 acres can be made available for the Montgomery area.
Schaduling: Master planning and the development of the construction documents will be scheduled for FY 93/94
w~h Phase I construction beginning In FY 94/95,.
Operating Budget Effect: The Department, under the JPA, would most likely assume landsCape maintenance
of the addrtional school grounds. Net increase to operating budget is estimated to bo approximately $28,000 _
$30,000 for maintenance costs (4 ecros at $7,500/acro).
WPC F:~c..lE\WPC'CI1''''A-I:l3 (REV. Mwd\ u, 1m)
~ .. ANCUR A ~
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM DETAIL
CIPNO.: ST.513 INITIAL SCHEDULE: 94/ /
TITLE: ADA Curb Cuts Annual Program DEPARTMENT: Public Works/Engineering
COMMUNITY PLAN AREA: Citywide.. Various Locations PROJECT MANAGER: Samir Nuhaily
TOTAL
APPROPRIATIONS
PROJECT THRU CURRENT FY 1993.94 FY 1994-95 FYl995-96 FY 1996-97 FY 1997.98
COST ESTIMATES: TOTAL YEAR
I. Preparatory Planning $10.000 $2.000 $2.000 $2.000 $2.000 $2,000
II. Land Acquisition 0 , 0 0 0 0 0
III. Design 15.000 3,000 3,000 3,000 3.000 3,000
IV. Construction 200,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000 40,000
V. General Administration .. 25,000 5,000 5,000 5,000 5.000 5,000
TOTALS $0 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000
FINANCING SOURCES:
COSG $250.000 $50,000 $50.000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000
FINANCING TOTALS i $0 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000 $50,000
Description: This project provides for the construction of concrete wheelchair ramps at an estimated 47 locations
throughout the City annually.
Justification: Existing pedestrian facilities lack wheelchair ramps which lim ~s the mobility of physically challenged
residents. The construction of wheelchair ramps will increase the mobility of these residents. Curb cuts are a
requirement of the Americans with Disabil~ies Act. .
Scheduling: Design: First Quarter - FY 93/94; Construction: Second Quarter - FY 93/94.
Operating Budget Effect: None.
WPC F:~CUE\WPCiCIPISHI13 (REV. ""005, 11$3)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM DETAIL
CIPNO.: STM.302 INITIAL SCHEDULE: 93/95/95
llTLE: Fourth Avonue - Del Rey High SchooVOrange Avonue DEPARTMENT: Public Worka/Englnaerlng
COMMUNITY PLAN AREA: Montgomery Area PROJECT MANAGER: Samlr Nuhally
TOTAL
APPROPRIAllONS
PROJECT THRU CURRENT FY 1993-94 FY 1994-95 FY 1995-96 FY 1996-97 FY 1997-98
COST ESllMA TES: TOTAL YEAR
I. Preparatory Plannin9 $0 $0 $0
II. Land Acquisition 481,000 0 481.000
III. Design 67.665 67.665 0
IV. Construction 1,276,335 0 1,276,335
V. General Administration 0 0 0
TOTALS ....................~1.: $0 $67,665 $1,757.335 $0 . $0 $0
FINANCING SOURCES:
CDBG $1.825,000 $67,665 $1,757.335
FINANCING TOTALS Ii $0 $67,665 $1,757.335 $0 $0 $0
Description: This project will widen Fourth Avenue to acoommodate a lour-lane major roadway w~h bike lanes
Irom Del Rey High School to 250 It. north of Orange Avenue; Install curb. guller, sidewalk, and driveways on bolh
sides of the street; and install raised medians and widen remaining 250 ft. segment using the widest width
possible with minimal oonflict w~h existing structures.
Justnication: This segment of Fourth Avenue has missing curb, gutter, and sidewalks. The existing curb.to-curb
width varies from 64 ft. to 82 ft. This project will widen Fourth Avenue to handle vehicular traffic flow more
efficiently and will install raised medians to improve traffic circulation and safety.
Scheduling: Design reschedulod to FY 1994/95 and construction to FY 1995/96 due to lack of lunding
availability.
Operating BUdget Effect: None.
WI'C F,\HQME'lWPCICIPIMASTEP; (REV. Apr11', 1m)
o
,
" ,-
,,,
..L1..1...
l.;~~,"..ll, 1\_:,
I -"__"'LC..
:'
I :I;~.......,___,
: :-:~ ~..t:;~:.-_.
I..o...:t...c;\....:
~rrr l..,,,,_,
AV :7-
,:,~
.-,-" "
: ;i:
";'jL'
, . _ t - l ~
~ I _ ~
~-
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM DETAIL
CIPNO.: lB.130 INITIAL SCHEDULE: 94/94/
TITLE: Main Ubrary R..Roof DEPARTMENT: Public Worko Operatlona
COMMUNITY PLAN AREA: Central Chura Vista PROJECT MANAGER: Gregg Henson
TOTAL
APPROPRIATIONS
PROJECT THRU CURRENT FY 1993-94 FY 1994-95 FY 1995-96 FY 1996-97 FY 1997.98
COST ESTIMATES: TOTAL YEAR
I. Pr.p.ratory Planning $0 $0
II. Land Acquisition 0 0
III. Design 7,500 7,500
IV. Construction 107,500 107,500
V. General Administration 5.700 5.700
TOTALS ~ .'
$0 $120.700 $0 $0 $0 $0
FINANCING SOURCES:
CDBG $120,700 $120,700
FiNANCING TOTALS $t2<l,7M $0 $120.700 $0 $0 $0 $0
Description: This project provides for the removal and replacement of Ihe "bui~ up" roof areas al the central
library which are approximately 20 years old.
Justification: The library was constructed in 1974. The flat roof has reached its Iffe expectancy. Numerous
leaks are developing and maintenance efforts do not effectively correct defective roof membrane.
SCheduling: Before winter rains of 1993 and spring of 1994.
Operating Budqet Effect: None.
WPC F:~OME\WPC\CIPIl..B.130 (REV. Apr. 21, 1m)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM DETAIL
CIPNO,: STl.213 INITIAL SCHEDULE: 94/94/
TITLE: N.I.C. Road Surfacing DEPARTMENT: Public Works/Operations
COMMUNITY PLAN AREA: Bayfront PROJECT MANAGER: Harlan Wilson
TOTAL
APPROPRIA TlONS
PROJECT THRU CURRENT FY 1993.94 FY 1994-95 FY 1995-96 FY 1996-97 FY 1997-96
COST ESTIMATES: TOTAL YEAR
I. Preparatory Planning $0 $0
II. Land Acquisition 0 0
III. Design 1,000 1,000
IV. Construction 25,000 25,000
V. General Administration 4,000 4,000
TOTALS i .i'. ....
i $0 $30,000 $0 $0 $0 $0
FINANCING SOURCES:
CDSG $30,000 $30,000
FINANCING TOTALS >ic c_ $0 $30,000 . $0 $0
..ii $0 $0
: F,~a.lE\VVPC\CIP'STL.213 IREV ~I I. ,It:lj
~,............,....
"scription: Installation of AC pavement on Gunpowder Point Drive from Bay Boulevard to a point approximately
)0 feet west of Bay Boulevard, The work will consist of AC paving over a two lane drive with no curbs or
dewalks, Public Works Operations will complete the rough grading of the subject street section,
Jstification: The City scrapes and grades the road several times a year and the costs in both time and
ate rials are considerable, The rough road results in an uncomfortable ride for the visitors to the Nature Center
ld it also increases the operation and maintenance costs for the buses. The rough road also presents safety
oblems for staff, buses, volunteers and delivery services.
,heduling: Design: First Quarter - FY 93/94; Construction: Second Quarter of FY 93/94,
perating BUdget Effect:
PAOJfCTlOCA1K)N ..............
.'.
':u,."
FEB 1993
!l.:-.r": '\!' d
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
FUNDING APPLICA nON FOR 1993-94
1;("1T;
NOTE: THIS APPLICATION IS DUE NO LATER THAN MARCH 1,1993 AT 5
P.M. AT THE CITY OF CHULA ViSTA, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT, 276 FOURTH AVE., CHULA VISTA.
Program/Project Name:
COMMUNITY APPEARANCE PROGRAM - SPOT BLIGHT
Name of Organization:
CITY OF CIIULA VISTA, DEPARTMENT OF BUILDING & HOUSING
Contact Person: KENNETH G. LARSEN, CBO Title DIRECTOR OF BUILDING & HOUSING
Address:
Telephone___
I, Amount of Funding Requested:
$ 27,000
2. Amount of 1992-93 CDBG Funding:
$ 26,810
3. If this is an existing program, how many
years has it served Chula Vista residents?
3
years
4. Is this program physically located in Chula Vista'! YES
5. Describe the main goal(s), objectives, and activities of your organization:
To maintain, improve and enhance the quality of life in neighborhoods through
the City of Chula Vista's Community Appearance Program thereby ensuring
decent housing and a suitable living environment for residents of Chula Vista.
6. Describe the specific program for which funds are rcqucsted: (If you are only
requesting funds for general organizational support, go to question # 10).
Community Appearance Program - Spot Blight Removal
Neighborhood improvement activity includes providing paint, labor and clean-up
that is necessary to complete neighborhood improvement efforts.
7. Why is this program needed in Chula Vista?:
Code Enforcement alone, without supplemental funding, cannot remove blighting
influences in older areas, because a small percentage of elderly, disabled
or low income individuals cannot afford to.
8. Who will be providing the services? Brieny describe qualifications of key
staff and. indicate their level of education/training:
Code Enforcement Officers - extensive field training
Administrative Support - college grads, administratively trained
Director - educated and trained
9. Program Budget: Total: $ 26,810
(Include only those expenses directly related to the program for which funding is
requested).
CDBG OTHER FUNDS
Salaries/Benefits: $ - 0 - $ 960 manhours of City staff
(General Fund)
Rent/Utilities: $ 20,000 $ - 0 -
Equipment/Supplies:
Other Labor $ 3,600 $ - 0 -
Other Paint/Wood $ 1,280 $ 0
Other Miscellaneou~ $ 2,120 $ - 0 -
Subtotals: $ 27,000 $ - 0 -
10. Specify exactly how the CDBG funds will be used:
Rent dumpsters
Purchase paint
Purchase wood/fence material
Labor to load dumpsters, remove sheds, fix fences, paint
Rent small tools
11. Please list the name and amount of other secured or potential sources of
funding for this specific program:
General Fund pays salaries of approximately 960 manhours of City staff
12. Do you anticipate needing CDBG funding for this progrnm in subsequent
years? Yes x No
If yes, how much funding will be needed each year?
1994-95 $ 27,000 1995-96 $ 30,000 1996-97 $ 40,000
13. Who will be served by your program and what nre the boundaries of your
service area?
Low income homeowners in older neighborhoods in area of City between
freeways 5 and 805. Elderly and disabled individuals.
14. How do people find out about your program? How do you do outreach?
Code Enforcement Officers hand out flyers. Mayor's Crime Prevention Commission
volunteers walk neighborhoods handing out flyers. Neighborhood committees
hold local meetings. Local newspaper stories and City's Quarterly mailout
supplement provided with trash bill.
15. Do you assist clients to get to your program site or provide services out in the
community?
Yes, service is provided at the residence of client.
16. For this specific program for which CDBG is requested, estimate the total
number of:
a. Total clients served or estimated to be served in:
Households
1993-94
1992-93
1991-92
1,000
900
1,000
b. Chula Vista residents served or estimated to be served in:
Households X 2.9
1993-94
1992-93
1991-92
2,900
2,610
2,900
c. Low-income clients served or estimated to be served in:
(low-income household is defined as follows: I person =$23,150; 2person =$26,450;
3person =$29,750; 4person =$33,050)
90% of Residents
1993-94
1992-93
1991-92
2,600
2,400
2,600
17. What methods will you use to account for the income level and other
demographic infonnation on your clients?
Census data identifies low income areas
Neighborhood Committees identify needy within neighborhoods
PLEASE ATTACH THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
a) A PROGRAM BROCHURE OR FLYER (if you have one)
b) A CURRENT LIST OF YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS (one page)
c) A COMPLETE LIST OF CURRENT SOURCES OF REVENUE (one page)
December 21, 1992
CIlY OF CHULA VISTA
COMMUNIlY APPEARANCE PROGRAM
SUMMARY
(STARTED-MARCH 1,1989)
1. BARBORSIDE - 198 Homes
(March 1, 1989 through April 29, 1989)
Department of Building and Housing Code Enforcement Officers
Laidlaw Waste Systems provided free dumpsters
San Diego County provided free dump passes
"I Love A Clean San Diego County, Inc." provided brochure printing
Boy Scout Troop 874 Bonita helped load trucks
Cub Scout Den 2 Pack 873 delivered brochures
McDonald's provided lunch for volunteer workers
Baptist Church sent 12 people to pick up litter along Industrial
Home Club provided volunteers with gloves
City Public Works Department cleaned up afterwards
Residents of the area cleaned out 165 tons of unwanted stuff in eleven
dumpsters and 54 inoperable vehicles were abated
2. CONNOLEY PARK - 250 Homes
(July 14, 1989 through October 31, 1989)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Housewives called the City and requested we tag all the inoperable vehicles in
their area
43 inoperable vehicles were abated
Yard inspections showed 172 homes were A-OK
78 homes had code violations that required work
3 homes required major maintenance and yard clean-up
Housewives cheered and clapped as inoperable vehicles were towed from the
area
.
.
.
.
.
3. OTAYTOWN - 404 Homes
(November 1, 1989 through May 31,1990)
Otay Town Citizens Committee requested that every property be inspected
and City ordinances be strictly enforced
Co=unity Development Department provided $12,925 for 55 dumpsters
San Diego County donated 61 dump passes (total - 116 dumpsters - 1740
tons)
Pubfic Works Department scraped the alleys clean
"I Love A Clean San Diego County, Inc. provided trash bags
178 inoperable vehicles were abated
Four 20-yard bins of recyclable items were collected
(Note: This was considered to be too large an area. It should have been done in four
phases. Continuity was lost when going back for reinspection.)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
-2-
4. BAY VISTA - 238 Homes
(April 1, 1990 through April 28, 1990)
"I Love A Oean San Diego County, Inc." donated the brochures and bags
Baptist Church - 20 people picked up 100 bags of litter
LaIdlaw donated six dumpsters plus one recycle bin
Building and Housing staff helped residents load and haul
Youths (16) from the Church of Jesus Christ Of Latter-Day Saints helped
load trash
Girl Scouts (12) delivered brochures
Six dumpster loads were removed (90 tons)
5. BROADWAY/MALTA SQUARE - 232 Homes
(August 1, 1990 through October 31, 1990)
This is a mixed land use area - single family homes and apartments
This area was inspected during the Annual City-Wide Clean-Up with one
dumpster site servrng the neighborhood (Fiesta School)
37 inoperable vehicles were abated
11 dumpster bins removed (165 tons)
One recycle bin was filled and removed
6. WOODIAWN PARK - 106 Homes
(November 1,1990 through February 1991)
Woodlawn Park Citizens Committee organized the program and met at the
Community Center - a very convenient setup as neighbors would come to the
center with their concerns and requests
San Diego Urban Corps assisted in tearing down five sheds and helping
neighbors haul out 46 dumpsters of unwanted stuff (690 tons)
Community Development Department provided funds for 46 dumpsters
106 inoperable vehicles were abated
Public Works Department tractors tore down (crushed) five sheds
Two recycle bins collected 4.74 tons for $94.80, which went to the San Diego
Urban Corps
7. OTAY.WHITI1NGTON - 50 Homes
(March 1991)
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
This is part of Otay Town NRP delayed until the Otay Town Committee could
contact the people
Two Code Enforcement Officers and one City truck worked a Saturday with
the residents
15 dumpster loads (225 tons) were hauled out in one morning - a new record
Four truck loads were hauled out in the afternoon
This project showed the value of working in smaller neighborhoods; the
neighbors get more involved
Six inoperable vehicles were abated
..
..
..
..
..
-3-
8. COUNTRY CLUB ESTATES - 225 Homes
(July 19, 1991 through August 30, 1991)
57 units were inspected
Brochures were passed out to all properties
A few residents ~ot together, wrote and distnbute a flyer objecting to
mandatory inspectIons and compliance
Director of Building and Housing attended their Sunday meeting of
approximately 100 residents to answer their concerns
The end result was a thorough review and restructuring of the City's
Neighborhood Improvement Pro~am to the degree that the name of the
program was changed to Commumty Appearance Program
44 inoperable vehicles were abated
Approximately 10 dumpsters of trash were removed
9. GUUCK TRAIT - 53 Homes
(October 1991 through December 31, 1991)
First CAP. Funded by Community Development Block Grant Funds
*
*
.
.
*
.
.
.
Neighborhood Committee established by Subcommittee of Crime Prevention
Commission
53 Properties were inspected
$7,745 was budgeted, $7,137 was spent
24 of 53 properties need corrective action
10 of 24 needed some financial assistance
2 properties will enter rehabilitation program
225 tons of trash was hauled out
16 inoperable vehicles were removed
12 new trees were planted
On 12n/91 all lawns were mowed and trimmed; many by volunteers, most by
property owners
6 old sheds were removed
11 houses were painted by homeowners
3 houses had trim painted with Community Development funds
2 major clean-up actions removed; the major blight and a rat harborage
1 hazardous block wall removed
New rear steps installed by volunteers
.
.
.
*
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
*
.
.
-4-
10. PALM AVENUE (BRODERICK OTAY ACRES) - 68 Homes
(January 1992 through June 1992)
Neighborhood Committee established by Citizens Advisory Committee
.
.
.
.
23 inoperable vehicles were removed
36 dumpsters of trash were removed (540 tons)
228 person/hours helped in the cleanup
1 property is now in the City's rehabilitation program - Volunteers from the
Board or Realtors walked the family through the process as part of their
Community Service Project
Members of the Citizens Advisory Committee helped a property owner
rebuild his front picket fence and paint it
One 84-year old lady was helped by replacing 50' of their rotted side yard
fence
7 properties were painted by property owners - C.AP. purchased the paint for
two of the seven
All properties were cleared of trash, debris and rubbish
Only one property owner refused assistance of any kind, but she did cleanup
by herself
New construction will begin on two parcels that were cleaned up
.
.
.
.
.
.
11. FEASTER SCHOOL NEIGHBORHOOD - 84 Homes
(June 1992 through August 1992)
Citizens Advisory Committee met with Neighborhood Committee at Feaster School
.
.
.
.
14 inoperable vehicles were removed
30 dumpsters of trash were removed ( 450 tons)
48 person/hours helped in the cleanup
The large vacant property across from Feaster School was the major
complaint of the CommIttee - It was cleaned and fenced
2 fences were repaired by owners
10 sheds were removed
One 91-year old lady was helped by having three old sheds removed from her
property
7 properties were painted by property owners - C.AP. purchased the paint for
three of the seven
All properties were cleared of trash, debris and rubbish
No property owner refused to participate
Additional dumpsters were placed at 'D" Street for general use - 24
dumpsters were filled (over the original 6 for a total of 30)
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COlVuvruNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
FUNDING APPLICATION FOR 1993-94
i..'.'. .
tui LdJ
Cum:,: "". "~~
lJe;,':;;r~';;,~\.:~'-"''''''
NOTE: THIS APPLICATION IS DUE NO LATER THAN MARCH 1, 1993 AT 5
P.1H. AT THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT, 276 FOURTH AVE., CHULA VISTA.
Program/Project Name: Chula vista Coornunity Development Project
Name of Organization: South Bay Coornunity Services
Contact Person: Kathryn Lerri:x>
Title Executive Director
Address:
~- --
Telephone
1. Amount of Funding Requested:
S 57,025
2. Amount of 1992-93 CDBG Funding:
S 48,000
3. If this is an existing program, how many
years has it served Chula Vista residents?
2 1/2 years
4. Is this program physically located in Chula Vista?
Yes
5. Describe the main goal(s), objectives, and activities of your organization:
See Attachm2nt A
-
o. Describe the specific progr::lm for ',vhich funds ~rc requested: tIf \ au Jr2 1)01\
requesting funds for gener:ll org~niz;J.tion31 support, go to question ;3 10).
See Attachment B
7. Why is this program needed in Chub Vista"?:
SBCS' Community Development Program is addressing the need to develop
and preserve affordable housing, economic opportunities, and community
services to low-income areas of Chula Vista. These needs have been
highlighted by citizen advisory committees writing the draft housing
element for 1991-96, Chula vista 2000 (small business needs), and
the Chula vista Social Services Plan. The findings in these
documents have been supported by our discussions with over 100
residents. Additional1y,homelessness was an identified issue
in the December 1992 Human Services Needs Assessment.
8. Who will be providing the services"? Briefly describe qualifications of key
staff and indicate their level of education/training:
The program is administered by South Bay Community Services. A
full time coordinator with a M.A. in Business (Public/Private
Partnerships) with experience in affordable housing directs the
program under the supervision of SBCS's Executive Director. Also
a Community Advisory Committee consisting of local residents,
business people, and housing developer representatives provides
input.
.9.. Program Budget: Total: S 396,163
(Include only those expenses directly related to the program for which funding is
requested) .
CDBG OTHER FUNDS
Salaries/Beneiits: S 56,650 S 44,611
Rene/Utilities: 375
Equipmene/Supplies: 2,000
* Other proq. exps: 225,000
Other mileaa~ / 1,500
travel
Other indirect 66,027
costs
Subtotals: s. 57,025 S 339,138
* Operating costs for KidzBiz program, Trasitional Housing
Program and Short Term Housing for Homeless families.
t
~
10. Specify exactly how the CD13G funds will be used:
Funds will be used for full tine Coordinator and a percent of the
personnel =sts for affordable housing developrrent (TLP and short term).
11. Please list the name and amount of other secured or potential sources of
funding for this specific program:
Wal Mart Foundation $ 8,000
San Diego COlTIIIlll'lity Foundation $ 40,000 Kellogg Found. $ 5,000
Security Pacific Bank $ 10,000 Household "ank $ 2,500
Bank of America $ 5,000
LISC $ 5,000 Home Depot $ 5,000
Wells Fargo $ 5,000
12. Do you anticipate needing CDBG funding for this program in subsequent
years? Yes X No
If yes, how much funding will be needed each year?
1994-95 $ 60,000 1995-96 $ 60,000 1996-97 $ ?
13. Who will be served by your program and what are the boundaries of vour
service area?
The Community Development Program serves low-income residents
of West and South Chula vista. The majority of residents
are his panic and most have incomes lower than 70% of the area
median' income. The program seeks to provide affordable rental
units to over 1100 low-income residents by the end of 1993.
Additionally, we look to directly serve over 100 persons through
our eCQDom~c development and community revitalization projects.
14. !iow do people find out about your program? How do you do outreach?
Through public presentations, media newspaper, and agency
outreach efforts.
15. Do you assist clients to get to your program site or provide services out in the
co=unity?
Yes, both.
16. For this specific program for which CDBG is requested. estlm~te the total
number of:
a. Total clients served or estimated to be served in:
1993-9,1
1992-93
1991-92
NJA
b. Chala Vista residents served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94
1992-93
1991-92
N/A
c. Low-income clients served or estimated to be served in:
(low-income household is defined as follows: I person =S23, 150; 2person =.526,450;
3person=S29,750; 4person=S33,050)
1993-94
1992 -93
1991-92
N/A
17. What methods will you use to account for the income level and other
demographic information on YOUI' clients?
Although the focus of SBCS is on improving the lives of children,
youth, and families, we understand that if we are to impact
the larger social situation, we need to build a community-based
organization which can address the needs of the community
and can bring together the resources needed to create solutions.
The Community Development Program was created to meet this
need by initiating a variety of community supported activities
to improve the quality of life for low-income residents of
Chula vista by preserving and creating affordable housing
and economic opportunities.
Due to a number of factors, including the great and immediate
need in our community, the commitment of residents and staff
,
and available technical assistance, the community development
arm of SBCS has far exceeded its expectations. While poised
to undertake a number of critical projects, we need to build
our staff capacity.
PLEASE ATTACH THE. FOLLOW ING 1TE.".1S:
a) A PROGRAM BROCHURE OR FLYER. (if you have one)
b) A CURREJ.'IT LIST OF YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS (one page)
c) A CO!\1PLETE LIST OF CURREJ.~T S0l3RCES OF REVEJ.'IUE (one page)
AttachmE~nt A
MAIN GOALS, 09JECTIV~3, AND ACTIVIT2ES OF SOUTH BAY COMMUNITY SERVICES
:he ove~31l purpose o~ South Bay Community Services is to rei~force the
family's role in the community and to assist youth to aspire realistically
to lives of self- fulfillment.
~ain Objectives include:
Juvenile Crime Prevention - reduction in delinquency among "high risk ,.
youth and reduction in recidivism among youth in the justice system.
P~evention of the Exploitation & Abuse of Children & Youth
Improve family functioning and parenting skills.
Reduction of family violence.
Provision of quality services for runaway and homeless youth and their
families.
Provide quality after school care for young people.
Provide prevention education including Substance Abuse and AIDS prevention
education.
Empower youth through involvement in agency programs and services - such
as peer education/counselor project.
Provide volunteer opportunities for local residents and students.
Provide literacy skills training for youth.
Community Development Activities including; neighborhood revitalization,
low income housing development and economic development aimed at low
income residents.
Work cooperatively with other agencies local, statewide and nationally in
insuring effective human services.
.HTT.\CmlE:-IT 3
6. SPECIFIC PROGRAM FOR WHICH FUNDS ARE REQUESTED
SBCS' Community Development Pro~ram's mission is to provide
community development and neighborhood revitalization by creating
affordable housing options, neighborhood improvement projects, and
economic advancement opportunities for the community of Chula
Vista. Currently the project is working on the following:
HOUSING OPPORTUNITIES
preservation of affordable rental units under HUD 236 programs.
develop transitional housing and low cost rental housing for
families.
first time home buyer education component. Teaching potential
first time home buyers about home purchasing and financing,
concentrating on informing lower income families.
develop emergency short term housing for homeless families.
joint venture with San Diego Affordable Housing Coalition to
develop affordable home ownership units.
continue affordable apartment rental referral service for low
income families.
COMMUNITY REVITALIZATION:
small neighborhood improvement projects.
ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES:
cont inuat ion of KIDBIZ, a program to teach
business/entrepreneurial skills to gang members and provide them
with mentors and support in starting their own businesses.
315 4th Avenue, Suite E . Chula Vista' CA 91910 . (619) 420-3620/9790/5051
BOARD OF DIRECTORS ROSTER
Charles Moore
Sales Manager
Laidlaw Waste
Ray-Etta Morrell
A usa Club
Estela Lemos
Tony Linares
Medical Director
~-~n~~Aetna Health Plan
~ Chula 1910
unltec:lway
of San OiegoCany
President
Dept.
Shirley Ferrill, Treasurer
Program Coordinator
----
National C~ty, CA 91950
Emerald Randolph
Retired, Director
Chula vista Elementary
School District
~5
Freddie Nesbit
Retired, Consultant
California Youth Authority
Insurance
Chula Vista, CA 91912
l.",
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
FUNDING APPLICATION FOR 1993-94
FEB 1993
, F1e';f'jiverf
t..lii:liiilJ;;ltY[)eve'.
D Opment
e!:artmer:t
NOTE: THIS APPLICATION IS DUE NO LATER THAN MARCH 1, 1993 AT 5
P.M. AT THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT, 276 FOURTH AVE., CHULA VISTA.
Program/Project Name: Graffiti Eradication project
Name of Organization: South Bay Community Services
Contact Person: Kathryn Lembo
Title Executive Director
Address:
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Telephone
I. Amount of Funding Requested:
$ 38,261
2. Amount of 1992-93 CDBC Funding:
$ 33,600
3. If this is an existing program, how many
years has it served Chula Vista residents?
4
years
4. Is this program physically located in Chula Vista? yes
5. Describe the main goal(s), objectives, and. activities of your organization:
See Attachment A
6. Describe the specific program for which funds are requested: (If you are only
requesting funds for general organizational support, go to question # ]0).
A neighborhood revitalization project which provides graffiti
eradication to City of Chula vista businesses and private
residences. A joint venture of CVPD and SBCS the program
incorporates youth who are responsible for graffiti and
other crimes into work crews with volunteers, which then
go out to different sites and remove graffiti from business
and private residences, thus doing restitution to the community.
7. Why is this program needed in Chula Vista?:
Over the years, Chula vista has experienced a rise in gang
related activities such as graffiti. In fact, graffiti is one means
in which gangs define and claim territory, communicate
and challenge each other. Additionally, it is a neighborhood
eyesore and presents an image of crime and neighborhood
dilapidation.
8. Who will be providing the services'? Briefly describe qualifications of key
staff and indicate their level of education/training:
Trained staff will coordinate and assign juveniles owing
community restitution into work crews. These staff have
experience working with youth.
9. ProgramBudget: Total: $ 55,556
(Include only those expenses directly related to the program for which funding is
requested).
Salaries/Benefits:
CDBG
$ 33,311
$
OTHER FUNDS
6,995
Rcnt/Utilitics:
Equipmcnt/Supplics:
2,000
10,000
Othcr MilC'aqe
450
200
Other Insurance:
(liability)
Other
2,500
Subtotals:
$ 38,261
$
17,195
10. Specify exactly how the cDBe funds will be used:
CDBG funds will be used to pay the salary of the full time
Graffiti Coordinator, a percent of volunteer recruitment,
administration, equipment costs, mileage, and a percent
of agency liability insurance.
11. Please list the name and amount of other secured or potential sources of
funding for this specific program:
South Bay Community Services agency general fund, City of
Chula Vista Police Department funds.
12. Do you anticipate needing CD Be funding for this program in subsequent
years? Yes x No
If yes, how much funding will be needed each year?
1994-95$42,000 1995-96$44,000 1996-97$ 47,000
13. Who will be served by your program and what are the boundaries of your
service area?
City of Chula Vista local businesses and private residences
will be served as well as youth who will fulfill community
service hours.
14. How do people find out about your program? How do you do outreach?
The Star News publishes the graffiti hotline number. Staff
also makes public presentations and coordinates neighborhood
graffiti coalitions.
15. Do you assist clients to get to your program site or provide services out in the
community?
Both
16. For this specific program for which CDBG is requested, estimate the total
number of:
a. Total clients served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94
1992-93
1991-92
N/A
b. Chula Vista residents served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94
1992-93
1991-92
N/A
c. Low-income clients served or estimated to be served in:
(low-income household is defined as follows: Iperson=$23,150; 2person=$26,450;
3person = $29,750; 4person = $33,050)
1993-94
1992-93
1991-92
N/A
17. What methods will you use to account for the income level and other
dem02rav!\ic infonnation on your clients?
'!be Graff1ti Eradication Project is a joint venture with the alUla Vista
Police Department and part of an overall strategy to address the issues
of gangs and gang activity in Chula Vista and the South Bay area. CVPD
in cooperation with SB::S provides a Gang Awareness Program ainro at
elenentary school children, their parentS and the coommity. Presentations
are made informing them about gangs, the =nsequences of gang activity
and prevention. Jldditionally, SB::S both at elementary and junior high,
high school levels provides =unseling, parent education, recreation,
mediation, and other services ainro at high risk youth and youth involved
with gangs. 'lhis is funded with school district monies.
'!be Graffiti Program totals for the period 7/1/92 to 1/31/93 are as follows:
,Tuveni1es Referred: 131
Sites eradicated: 742
Public: 26
Private: 353
Utility Boxes: 323
Total Hours: 2,405
PLEASE ATfACH THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
a) A PROGRAM BROCHURE OR FLYER (if you have one)
b) A CURRENT LIST OF YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS (one page)
c) A COMPLETE LIST OF CURRENT SOURCES OF REVENUE (one page)
ATTACHMENT A
MAIN GOALS, OBJECTIVES, AND ACTIVITIES OF SOUTH BAY COMMUNITY
SERVICES.
The overall purpose of South Bay Community Services is to reinforce
the family's role in the community and to assist youth to aspire
realistically to lives of self-fulfillment.
Main Objectives include:
Juvenile Crime Prevention - reduction in delinquency among "high
risk" youth and reduction in recidivism among youth in the justice
system.
Prevention of the Exploitation and Abuse of Children and Youth.
Improve family functioning and parenting skills.
Reduction of family violence.
Provision of quality services for runaway and homeless youth and
their families.
Provide quality after school care for young people.
Provide prevention education including Substance Abuse and AIDS
prevention education.
Empower youth through involvement in agency programs and services -
such as peer education/counselor project.
Provide volunteer opportunities for local residents and students.
Provide literacy skills training for youth.
Community developmen~ Activities including;
revitalization, low ~ncome housing development
development aimed at low income residents.
neighborhood
and economic
Work cooperatively with other agencies local, statewide and
nationally in insuring effective human services.
SOCIAL SERVICE FUNDING POLICY
This social service policy is designed to identify those projects
and agencies which can deliver important benefit to Chula Vista
residents effectively and efficiently. In addition to the use of
the policy quidelines listed below, the City Council will require
the submission of social service agencies expenses, income, and
funding sources from the previous two years to aid in the
evaluation of funding proposals.
1. Social service projects must establish or maintain a resource
which would enhance the quality of life of the Chula vista
community.
2. Initial grants to social service projects must create a new
level of service for the clients of the requesting agency or
must replace funding sources for existing levels of service
which have been removed through no fault of the requesting
agency.
3. Social service grants will be made only to agencies which have
demonstrated in the past the capacity to perform diligently
and efficiently.
4. Preference will be given to those projects which instill in
their clients the resources to move beyond the need for
assistance by that agency or which allow their clients to
avoid greater dependency on other forms of social assistance.
5. Preference will be given to those projects which are most cost
effective in the delivery of benefit to low and moderate-
income citizens of Chula vista.
6. Preference will be given to those projects which would become
self-sufficient or would secure other forms of assistance as
a result of City Community Development Block Grant assistance.
7. Social service grants will be made only to agencies and
projects which appear to have the capacity to expend those
grant funds in a timely manner.
8. Preference will be given to those projects which do not
duplicate an existing service.
.~pB'zj'}lwtrK~~
South Bay Community Services Inc.
315 4th Avenue, Suite E . Chula Vista. CA 91910 . (619) 420-3620/9790/5051
BOARD OF DIRECTORS ROSTER
Charles L. Pugsley, President
Agent, C.v.Police Dept.
Ranie Hunter, Secretary
The Baldwin Compan
Ty Compton
Charles Moore
Sales Manager
Laidlaw Waste
1911
Ray-Etta Morrell
Altrusa Club
Tony Linares
Medical Director
~n~~Aetna Health Plan
. Chu 910
Jnltecl way
, San Ooego Carty
President
Dept.
Shirley Ferrill, Treasurer
Program Coordinator
Metro, Inc.
Chula Vista, CA 91911
Emerald Randolph
Retired, Director
Chula vista Elementary
liIiiiIiIIiiIIict
Jamul, CA 91935
Brad Wilson
vice President
~x Insurance
Chula Vista, CA 91912
"
CITY OF CIIULA VISTA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT nLOCK GRANT
FUNDING APPLICATION FOR 1993-94
N01E: 11I1S AI'PUCA11ON IS DUE NO LATER TIlAN MARCil I, 1993 AT 5
P.M. AT 11IE CITY OF CIlULA VISTA, COMMUNl1"Y DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT, 276 FOURTIl AVE., CIIULA VISTA.
Program/Project Name:
Playground Improvements - Mueller School
Name of Organization:
Chu1a Vista Elementary School District
Contact Person:
Kate Shurson
Tille Director of Planning & Facilities
Address:
Telephone
J. Amount uf Funding Requested:
$ 25,000
2. Amount of 1992-93 CUBG Fuudiug:
$ 0
3. Ir this i~ au existing progl"Rm, how many
yeal"S has it served Chula Vista residents?
years
4. Is this program physically located in Chula Vista'!
Yes
5. Describe the main goal(s), objectives, and activities of your organization:
Ii, IJpsnihe the s(lPcific (lro~mlll fOI' which f""ds are rl'qlll'sled: (If YOII are ollly
n'qllestin~ fllnds for ~l'lIeral OI'gani7.atiollal SlIppOrl, ~o to qllestion H 10).
Playground improvements to provide enhanced/expanded recreational
opportunities for students and area residents.
7, Wh)' is this ')I'O~I'alll lIeeded III Chllla Vista?:
Parks and recreational opportunities in western Chula Vista are limited.
These improvements would enhance/expand facilities on school site to
better serve both students and area residents.
R, Who will he p.'ovidillg Ihe senicl's'! 8rieny desel'ihe qllalil1catlolls of key
starr alld illdicate thdr level of edllcaliollltrllilljllg:
9. I'mgl'lllll nlld~el : Total: $ 25,000
(lnclllde only those expenses directly related to the progralll for which funding is
requested).
CIJBG
OTHER FUNDS
Salarieslllenefits:
$
$
Rcnt/Utilities:
Equi(llllcnt/SUI'IJlics:
Olhcr
Other
Other
Suhtotals:
$
$
10. Spccify cxactly how thc CDnG funds will be uscd:
(1) Construct DG running track and concrete berm.
(2) Repair and level turf playfield.
(3) Construct/install ballwall and A/C hardcourt.
(4) Construct/install concrete crawl tubes.
11. Please list the name and alllount of other secured or potential sources of
funding for this spccific program:
12. Do you anticipatc nceding CDnG funding for this program in subsequent
ycars? Yes X No To maintain playfields.
If yes, how much funding will be needed each year?
1994-95 $ 2. 500 1995 -96 $ 3.000 1996-97 $ 3.500
13. Who will be servcd by your program and what arc the boundaries of your
scr-vicc ar'ca?
Students attending Mueller School and area residents including baseball
and/or soccer leagues and groups.
14. How do people find out about your program? How do you do outreach?
Signage at the site.
15. Do you assist clients to get to your program site or provide services out in the
community?
No, other than regular school busing.
16. FOI' this specific progl'am for which CDBG is requested, estimate the total
mlmbel' of:
3. Total c1ieuts served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94
1992-93
1991-92
700+/- students plus many residents
and athletic groups.
b. Chula Vista residents served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94
1992-93
1991-92
See "a" above.
c. Low-income clients served or estimated to be served in:
(low-income household is defined as follows: I person =$23, ISO; 2person =$26,450;
3person =$29,750; 4person =$33,050)
1993-94 See "a" above.
1992-93
1991-92
17. What methods will you use to account for the income level and other
demographic infom13tion on your clients?
PLEASE ATIACH THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
a) A PROGRAM BROCHURE OR FLYER (if you have one)
b) A CURRENT LIST OF YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS (one page)
c) A COMPLETE LIST OF CURRENT SOURCES OF REVENUE (one page)
CHULA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT
84 EAST J STREET. CHULA VISTA, CA 91910 . (619) 425-9600 . FAX (619) 427-0463
GRADES KINDERGARTEN THROUGH SIX
DISTRICT PHILOSOPHY
"Each Child is an Individual 01 Great Worth and is Entitled to Develop to His or Her Fullest Potential."
MISSION STATEMENT
Our mission Is to provide a well-rounded education for our students by:
. developing skills in reading, oral and written language, and mathematics.
stimulating a desire for life-long learning.
motivating the use 01 intelligence and reason.
promoting the use of effective study skills and work habits.
developing an awareness of one's relationship to society and the environment.
. providing inspiration to become productive citizens.
cuttivating an appreciation lor the Fine Arts.
nurturing their physical and emotional well-being.
BOARD-ADOPTED PRIORITIES
To Improve Students' Personal and Academic Progress.
To Enhance the Learning and Working Environment.
To Strengthen Community Support lor the Schools.
To Develop a Plan for a Balanced Budget.
To Provide for a Changing Student Population.
DISTRICT PROFILE
18,200 Sludents
1,700 Employees
22 Traditional Calendar Schools
Nine Single-Track, Year-Round Schools
One Five-Track, Year-Round School
Integrated Special Education Programs
Six State-Sponsored Preschools
One State-Sponsored Child Care Center
Before/After School Care at Many Schools
PROGRAM FEATURES
. Literature-based Language Arts
. Math/Science/ Physical Education
. History/Social Science
. Multicultural Education
Fine Artsllnstrumental Music
Extensive Special Education Programs
. Multisensory Approach to Language Arts
Gifted and Talented Education
Transitional Second Language Education
. Technology Enhanced Instruction
. Library/Media Centers at Each School
Child Care/Preschool at Some Sites
Magnet Schools
Substance Abuse Prevention Education
- Comprehensive Staff Development Program
. Adolescent Growth Education
COMMUNITY
INVOLVEMENT
Parent Clubs/PTA . Volunteer/Grandparent Programs. Even Start
School Site Councils . Community Schools . Parent Education Programs
Partners-in-Education . Saturday Scholars . Gang Awareness
tc '.
BOARD OF EDUCATION
JOSEPH D. CUMMINGS, Ph.D. . LARRY E. CUNNINGHAM. SHARON GILES
PATRICKA.JUDD . GREG R.SANDOVAL
SUPERINTENDENT
JOHN F. VUGRIN, Ph.D.
Chula Vista Elementary School District
DATE:
December 16, 1992
TO: All Staff
MEMORANDUM
c.V. ELflvt
. SCHoo
RECEIVED L DIS1.
DEe 2 1
F:1.A. 1992
NNING & F
D. ACJ
EPART" Lt I/L S
'wENT ~
FROM: Superintendent's Office
SUBJ: NEW OFFICERS ELECTED TO BOARD OF EDUCATION:
ADOPTION OF BOARD OF EDUCATION REGULAR MEETING
DATES, TIME, AND PLACE FOR JANUARY THROUGH
NOVEMBER 1993
At its Organizational Meeting on December 15, 1992, the following Board
members were elected to office:
President
Vice President -
Clerk
Secretary
Larry E. Cunningham
Greg R. Sandoval
Joseph D. Cummings
John F. Vugrin
Regular Board meeting dates adopted for January through November 1993 are
as follows:
June 8, 1993
June 22,1993
July 13, 1993
August 10, 1993
September 7, 1993
September 21, 1993
October 5, 1993
October 19,1993
November 16, 1993
Meetings are held at 7:00 p.m. at the Education Center, 84 East "J" Street, Chula
Vista.
January 19, 1993
February 2, 1993
February 16, 1993
March 2, 1993
March 16, 1993
April 20, 1993
May 4, 1993
May 18,1993
SH
cc: Board of Education
Clear View Council PTA
Chula Vista City Council
Sweetwater Union High School District
The San DieQo Union-Tribune
The Star-News
Carol Coates, CSBA
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
FUNDING APPLICATION FOR 1993-94
NOTE: THIS APPLICATION IS DUE NO LATER THAN MARCHI, 1993 AT 5
P.M. AT TIlE CITY OF CIWLA VISTA, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT, 276 FOURTII AVE., CHULA VISTA.
Program/Project Name:
Playground Improvements - Feaster School
Name of Organization:
Chula Vista Elementary School District
Contact Person:
Kate Shurson
Title Director of Planning & Facilities
Address:
Telephone
I. Amount of Funding Requested:
$ 25,000
2. Amount of 1992-93 CDBG Funding:
$ 0
3. If this is an existing program, how many
years has it served Chula Vista residents?
years
4. Is this program physically located in Chura Vista?
Yes
5. Describe the main goal(s), objectives, and activities of your organization:
6. Describe lhe specific prog,.alll for which fuuds are requesled: (If you arc only
ITquesling fuuds for general OI.gauizalional snpport, go 10 qneslion # 10).
Playground improvements to provide enhanced/expanded recreational
opportunities for students and area residents.
7. Why is lhis progl"alll needed in Chnla Visla?:
Parks and recreational opportunities in western Chula Vista are limited.
These improvements would enhance/expand facilities on school site to
better serve both students and area residents.
8. Who will be providing lhe services'! Brieny describe qualifications of key
slaff and indicale lheir level of educalion/lraining:
9. I'rogr.amBudgel: Total: $ 25,000
(Include only Ihose expenses direclly relaled 10 Ihe program for whieh funding is
requested).
CDBO
OTHER FUNDS
SalarieslBenefils:
$
$
RenllUtilities:
Equipment/Supplies:
Other
Other
Other
Snbtotals:
$
$
10. Specify exactly how the CDnG funds will be used:
(1) Construct/install ballwall with A/C hardcourt.
(2) Construct lunch arbor to provide shade for lunch/picnic area.
(3) Purchase/install 2 soccer goal s.
(4) Repair and level turf playfield.
11. Please list the name and amount of other secured or potential sources of
funding for this specific prog.'am:
12, Do you anticipate needing CDnG funding for this program in subsequent
years? Yes X No To maintain playfields.
If yes, how much funding will be needed each year?
1994-95 $ 2,500 1995-96 $ 3,000 1996-97 $ 3,500
13. Who will be served by your program and what are the boundaries of your
service 31'ea?
Students attending Feaster School and area residents including baseball and/or
soccer leagues and groups.
14. How do people find out about your program? How do you do outreach?
Signage at the site.
15. Do you assist clients to get to your program site or provide services out in the
community?
No, other than regular school busing.
16. For this specific p.'ogram for which CDBG is .'equested, estimate the total
number of:
a. Total clients served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94
1992-93
1991-92
750+/- students plus many residents
and athletic groups,
O. Chula Vista residents sened or estimated to be served in:
1993-94 See "a" above,
1992-93
1991-92
c. Low-income clients served or estimated to be served in:
(low-income household is defined as follows: Iperson=$23,150; 2person=$26,450;
3persoll =$29,750; 4persoll =$33,050)
1993-94 See "a" above,
1992-93
1991-92
17, What methods will you use to account for the income level and other
demographic information on your clients?
PLEASE ATfACH THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
a) A PROGRAM BROCHURE OR FLYER (if you have one)
b) A CURRENT LIST OF YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS (one page)
c) A COMPLETE LIST OF CURRENT SOURCES OF REVENUE (one page)
CHULA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT
84 EAST J STREET. CHULA VISTA, CA 91910 . (619) 425-9600 . FAX (619) 427-0463
GRADES KINDERGARTEN THROUGH SIX
DISTRICT PHILOSOPHY
"Each Child is an Individual 01 Great Worth and is Entitled to Develop to His or Her Fullest Potential."
MISSION STATEMENT
Our mission Is to provide a well-rounded education for our students by:
developing skills in reading, oral and written language, and mathematics.
stimulating a desire for life-long learning.
motivating the use of intelligence and reason.
promoting the use of effective study skills and work habits.
developing an awareness of one's relationship to society and the environment.
. providing inspiration to become productive citizens.
cultivating an appreciation for the Fine Arts.
nurturing their physical and emotional well-being.
BOARD-ADOPTED PRIORITIES
To Improve Students' Personal and Academic Progress.
To Enhance the Learning and Working Environment.
To Strengthen Community Support for the Schools.
To Develop a Plan for a Balanced Budget.
To Provide for a Changing Student Population.
DISTRICT PROFILE
18,200 Students
1,700 Employees
22 Traditional Calendar Schools
Nine Single-Track, Year-Round Schools
One Five-Track, Year-Round School
Integrated Special Education Programs
Six State-Sponsored Preschools
One State-Sponsored Child Care Center
Before/After School Care at Many Schools
.
PROGRAM
Literature-based Language Arts
Math/Science/ Physical Education
History/Social Science
Multicultural Education
Fine Arts/Instrumental Music
Extensive Special Education Programs
Multisensory Approach to Language Arts
Gifted and Talented Education
FEATURES
.
Transitional Second Language Education
Technology Enhanced Instruction
Library/Media Centers at Each School
Child Care/Preschool at Some Sites
Magnet Schools
Substance Abuse Prevention Education
Comprehensive Staff Development Program
Adolescent Growth Education
.
.
.
.
COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
Parent Clubs/PT A . Volunteer/Grandparent Programs . Even Start
School Site Councils . Community Schools . Parent Education Programs
Partners-in-Education . Saturday Scholars . Gang Awareness
BOARD 'OF EDUCATION
JOSEPH D. CUMMINGS. Ph.D. . LARRY E. CUNNINGHAM' SHARON GILES
PATRICK A. JUDD' GREG R. SANDOVAL
SUPERINTENDENT
JOHN F. VUGRIN, Ph.D.
Chula Vista Elementary School District
DATE:
December 16, 1992
TO: All Staff
MEMORANDUM
C.V.fltM
. SCHoo
RECEIVED L DIS7.
DE.e 2 1
E1.ANN 7.992
INc&
D.. FACI
tPAR"t.. u 111:.::;
"ItNi
FROM: Superintendent's Office
SUBJ: NEW OFFICERS ELECTED TO BOARD OF EDUCATION:
ADOPTION OF BOARD OF EDUCATION REGULAR MEETING
DATES, TIME, AND PLACE FOR JANUARY THROUGH
NOVEMBER 1993
At its Organizational Meeting on December 15, 1992, the following Board
members were elected to office:
President
Vice President -
Clerk
Secretary
Larry E. Cunningham
Greg R. Sandoval
Joseph D. Cummings
John F. Vugrin
Regular Board meeting dates adopted for January through November 1993 are
as follows:
January 19, 1993
February 2, 1993
February 16, 1993
March 2, 1993
March 16, 1993
April 20, 1993
May 4,1993
May 18,1993
June 8,1993
June 22, 1993
July 13, 1993
August 10, 1993
September 7, 1993
September 21, 1993
October 5, 1993
October 19,1993
November 16, 1993
Meetings are held at 7:00 p.m. at the Education Center, 84 East "J" Street, Chula
Vista.
SH
cc: Board of Education
Clear View Council PT A
Chula Vista City Council
Sweetwater Union High School District
The San Dieao Union-Tribune
The Star-News
Carol Coates, CSBA
CITY OF CIIULA VISTA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT IILOCI< GRANT
FUNDING APPLICATION FOR 1993-94
NOTE: 11I1S APPLlCA710N IS DUE NO LATER mAN MARCil I, 1993 AT 5
P.M. AT HIE CITY OF CllULA VISTA, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
/)El'AR1'MEN1~ 276 FOURTH A VE., CHUM VISTA.
Program/Project Name: Playground Improvements - Harborside School
Name of Organization: Chula Vista Elementary School District
Contact Person:
Kate Shurson
Title Director of Planning & Facil ities
Address:
Telephone
I. Anwunt of Funding Reqnested:
$ 25,000
$ 0
2. Amonnt of 1992-93 CDIlC Funding:
3. If this is an existing program, how many
years has it served Chula Vista residents?
years
4. Is this prog.-am physically located in Chula Vista?
Yes
5. Describe the main goal(s), objectives, and activities of your organizatiou:
(i. 1I1'~('rihe the ~pl'dlk IlI"llR'"alll for whil'h fuud~ are 1"('IIU('~t('d: (If you are only
n''1l1c~1iIl~ rlllllls rill" ~l'lll'ral 1II"~alli7.ati()llal s1lJlJl0l1. ~o to IIllestioll H 10).
Playground improvements to provide enhanced/expanded recreational
opportunities for students and area residents.
7. Wh}' is this 11I"OR'"alll nCl'ded in Chnla Vista?:
Parks and recreational opportunities in western Chula Vista are limited.
These improvements would enhance/expand facilities on school site to
better serve both students and area residents.
R. Whu will he IlrnvidinR the sel"ViI'es'! nrieny descrihe qualiflcatiuns of key
stalT and indicate their level of education/training:
9. "rogl"3l11 UudRet : Total: $ 25.000
(Include only those expenses directly related to the program for which funding is
requested).
CDBG
OTHER FUNDS
Salaries/lleocfits:
$
$
Rent/Utilities:
J "-Iuiplllcn(/ Suppl iI'S:
Other
Other
Olher
Subtolals:
$
$
10. Specify exactly how the CDBG funds willl.Je used:
(1) Construct/install ballwall.
(2) Purchase/install "Big Toy."
(3) Repair and level turf playfield.
II. Please list the name and amount of other secm'ed 01' potential sources of
funding for this specific pl"Ogmm:
12. Do you anticipate needing CDUG funding for this program in subsequent
J'l'at"S? Yes X No For maintaining playfields.
If yes, how much funding will be needed each year?
1994-95 $ 2,500 1995-96 $ 3,000 1996-97 $ 3,500
1.1. Who will be served by your program and what are the boundaries of your
sel""ice an'a'!
Students attending Harborside School and area residents including baseball and/or
soccer leagues and groups.
14. I10w do people find out about your program? I10w do you do outreach?
Signage at the site.
15. Do you assist clients to get to your program site or provide services out in the
comlllunity?
No, other than regular school busing.
I Ii. F",. this specific pl.ognllll for which CHIIG is n~qllested, estimate the total
IIl1mher- of:
:l. ].J!taLrRell!S serVl'd 01' estimated to be served ill:
1993.94
1992.93
1991.92
700+/- students plus many residents
and athletic groups,
h. Chula Visl.R.n:sidell!S sened 01' estimated to be served in:
1993.94
1992.93
1991.92
See "a" above,
C. Low.i!lcOIII~ clients served or eslimated to be served iu:
(Iow.income household is defined as follows: 1 person =$23, 150; 2person=$26,450;
:~person =$29,750; 4person =$33,(50)
1993.94 See "a" above.
1992.93
1991.92
17. What methods will you \l.Se to account for the income level and other
demographic information on your clients?
PLEASE ATI'ACII THE fOLLOWING ITEMS:
a) A PROGRAM BROCIIURE OR FLYER (if you have one)
Il) A CURRENT LIST OF YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS (one page)
c) A COMPLETE LIST 01<' CURRENT SOURCES OF REVENUE (one page)
CHULA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT
84 EAST J STREET. CHULA VISTA, CA 91910 . (619) 425-9600 . FAX (619) 427-0463
GRADES KINDERGARTEN THROUGH SIX
DISTRICT PHILOSOPHY
"Each Child is an Individual of Great Worth and is Entitled to Develop /0 His or Her Fullest Potential."
MISSION STATEMENT
Our mission Is to provide a well-rounded education for our students by:
developing skills in reading, oral and written language, and mathematics.
. stimulating a desire for life-long learning.
. motivating the use of intelligence and reason.
promoting the use of effective study skills and work habits.
developing an awareness of one's relationship to society and the environment.
. providing inspiration to become productive citizens.
. cultivating an appreciation for the Fine Arts.
nurturing their physical and emotional well-being.
BOARD-ADOPTED PRIORITIES
To Improve Students' Personal and Academic Progress.
To Enhance the Learning and Working Environment.
To Strengthen Community Support for the Schools.
To Develop a Plan for a Balanced Budget.
To Provide for a Changing Student Population.
DISTRICT PROFILE
18,200 Students
1,700 Employees
22 Traditional Calendar Schools
Nine Single-Track, Year-Round Schools
One Five-Track, Year-Round School
Integrated Special Education Programs
Six State-Sponsored Preschools
Oile State-Sponsored Child Care Center
Before/After School Care at Many Schools
PROGRAM FEATURES
. Literature-based Language Arts
Math/Science/ Physical Education
History/Social Science
Multicultural Education
. Fine Arts/Instrumental Music
Extensive Special Education Programs
Multisensory Approach to Language Arts
Gifted and Talented Education
Transitional Second Language Education
. Technology Enhanced Instruction
. Library/Media Centers at Each School
. Child Care/Preschool at Some Sites
. Magnet Schools
Substance Abuse Prevention Education
- Comprehensive Staff Development Program
Adolescent Growth Education
COMMUNITY
INVOLVEMENT
Parent ClubslPTA . Volunteer/Grandparent Programs. Even Start
School Site Councils . Community Schools . Parent Education Programs
Partners-in-Education . Saturday Scholars . Gang Awareness
BOARD OF EDUCATION
JOSEPH D. CUMMINGS, Ph.D. . LARRY E. CUNNINGHAM. SHARON GILES
PATRICK A. JUDD. GREG R. SANDOVAL
SUPERINTENDENT
JOHN F. VUGRIN, Ph.D.
,
Chula Vista Elementary School District
DATE:
December 16, 1992
TO: All Staff
MEMORANDUM
c. V. EL~M
. sCHoo
R~CEIVED L DIS/.
Dte 2 ]
ELANrv 1992
ING.p
D. '" FAel
~PART" Li IIc!;
'VI~Nr
FROM: Superintendent's Office
SUBJ: NEW OFFICERS ELECTED TO BOARD OF EDUCATION:
ADOPTION OF BOARD OF EDUCATION REGULAR MEETING
DATES, TIME, AND PLACE FOR JANUARY THROUGH
NOVEMBER 1993
At its Organizational Meeting on December 15, 1992, the following Board
members were elected to office:
President
Vice President -
Clerk
Secretary
Larry E. Cunningham
Greg R. Sandoval
Joseph D. Cummings
John F. Vugrin
Regular Board meeting dates adopted for January through November 1993 are
as follows:
January 19, 1993
February 2, 1993
February 16, 1993
March 2, 1993
March 16, 1993
April 20, 1993
May 4, 1993
May 18,1993
June 8, 1993
June 22,1993
July 13, 1993
August 10, 1993
September 7,1993
September 21, 1993
October 5, 1993
October 19, 1993
November 16, 1993
Meetings are held at 7:00 p.m. at the Education Center, 84 East "J" Street, Chula
Vista.
SH
cc: Board of Education
Clear View Council PT A
Chula Vista City Council
Sweetwater Union High School District
The San Diego Union-Tribune
The Star-News
Carol Coates, CSBA
.,
CITY OF CIIULA VISTA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
FUNIJING APPLICATION FOR 1993-94
NOTE: 11I1S APPUCA710N IS DUE NO lATER THAN MARCil I, 1993 AT 5
P.M. AT 11IE CITY OF CllUIA VISli1, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
IJEPAR1'MENT, 276 FOUR I'll AVE., CllUIA VISTA.
Program/Project Name:
Playground Improvements - Vista Square School
Name of Organization:
Chula Vista Elementary School District
Contact Person:
Ka te S hu rson
Title Director of Planning & Facilities
Address:
Telephone~
I. Amunnt of Fnnding Reqnested:
$ 25,000
2. Amount of 1992-93 CUBe Funding:
$ 0
3. If this is an existing p,'ogram, how many
years has it served Clmla Vista resideuts?
years
4. Is this program physically located in Chula Vista?
Yes
5. DesCl'ibe the main goal(s), objectives, and activities of your o,'ganization:
(i. lJl'snibe the s(ll'cilic IJI'o1(n11ll 1'01' which fuuds nre rcquested: (If you nre ouly
rl'qllesfilll( fUllds 1'01' gCllcrlll (JI'l(nllizntionnl 511(1p0l1, 1(0 to qllcstion H 10).
Playground improvements to provide enhanced/expanded recreational
opportunities for students and area residents,
7. \Vh}' is this IJI'ogl'alll lIeeded in Chlllll Vlstn?:
Parks and recreational opportunities in western Chula Vista are limited.
These improvements would enhance/expand facilities on school site to
better serve both students and area residents.
R, Who will be providing the senices'! Hrieny desCl'ibe qlllllil1cntiou5 of key
staff nud indicnte their level of eduentiou/trnilling:
q I'l'Ogl'lllll Hlldget : Tolal: $ 25,000
(Ioclude only those expenses directly related to the program for which funding is
requested) ,
CIJBG
OTHER FUNIJS
Salaries/Benefits:
$
$
Rent/Utililies:
J -jluipl1lent/Su(lplies:
Ot her
Olher
Olher
Suhtotals:
$
$
10. Spccify cxactly how the CDnG funds will bc uscd:
(1) Construct/install ballwall with A/C hardcourt.
(2) Construct lunch arbor to provide shade for lunch/picnic area.
(3) Repair and level turf playfield.
11. Please list thc namc and amount of othcr sccured or potential sourccs of
funding for this spccific program:
None.
12. Do you anticipate needing CDnG funding for this program in subsequcnt
ycars? Yes X No To maintain playfields.
If yes, how much funding will be needed each year?
1994-95 $ 2,500 1995-96 $ 3,000 1996-97 $ 3,500
13. Who will be servcd by your program and what are the boundaries of your
scnicc ar'ca?
Students attending Vista Square School and area residents including baseball
and/or soccer leagues and groups.
14. How do people find out about your program? How do you do outreach?
Signage at the site.
15. Do you assist clients to get to your program site or provide services out in the
community?
No, other than regular school busing.
16. FOI' this spccific p"ogrmn for which CDnG is ,'cqucstcd, cstimatc thc total
numuer of:
a. Total c1icnts sencd or estimated to be scrved in:
1993-94
1992-93
1991-92
600+/- students plus many residents
and athletic groups,
b. Chnla Vista rcsidents scrved or cstimated to be servcd in:
1993-94 See "a" above,
1992-93
1991-92
c. Low-income clients served or estimated to be served in:
(low-income household is defined as follows: I person =$23, 150; 2person=$26,450;
3person =$29,750; 4person =$33,050)
1993-94 See "a" above.
1992-93
1991-92
17. What methods will you use to account for the income level and other
demographic information on your clients?
PLEASE A1TACH THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
a) A PROGRAM BROCHURE OR FLYER (if you have one)
b) A CURRENT LIST OF YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS (one page)
c) A COMPLETE LIST OF CURRENT SOURCES OF REVENUE (one page)
CHULA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT
84 EAST J STREET. CHULA VISTA, CA 91910 . (619) 425-9600 . FAX (619) 427-0463
GRADES KINDERGARTEN THROUGH SIX
DISTRICT PHILOSOPHY
"Fact! Child is an Individual ot Great Worth and is Entitled to Develop to His or Her Fullest Potential."
MISSION STATEMENT
Our mission Is to provide a well-rounded education for our students by:
developing skills in reading, oral and written language, and mathematics.
stimulating a desire for life-long learning.
. motivating the use of intelligence and reason.
. promoting the use of effective study skills and work habns.
developing an awareness of one's relationship to society and the environment.
. providing inspiration to become productive cnizens.
cultivating an appreciation for the Fine Arts.
nurturing their physical and emotional well-being.
BOARD-ADOPTED PRIORITIES
To Improve Students' Personal and Academic Progress.
To Enhance the Learning and Working Environment.
To Strengthen Community Support for the Schools.
To Develop a Plan for a Balanced Budget.
To Provide for a Changing Student Population.
DISTRICT PROFILE
18,200 Students
1,700 Employees
22 Traditional Calendar Schools
Nine Single-Track, Year-Round Schools
One Five-Track, Year-Round School
Integrated Special Education Programs
Six State-Sponsored Preschools
One State-Sponsored Child Care Center
Before/After School Care at Many Schools
PROGRAM
FEATURES
. Literature-based Language Arts
Math/Science/ Physical Education
History/Social Science
Multicultural Education
Fine Arts/Instrumental Music
. Extensive Special Education Programs
Multisensory Approach to Language Arts
Gifted and Talented Education
. Transnional Second Language Education
. Technology Enhanced Instruction
Library/Media Centers at Each School
. Child Care/Preschool at Some Snes
. Magnet Schools
Substance Abuse Prevention Education
- Comprehensive Staff Development Program
Adolescent Growth Education
COMMUNITY INVOLVEMENT
Parent ClubslPTA . Volunteer/Grandparent Programs' Even Start
School Site Councils . Community Schools . Parent Education Programs
Partners-in-Education . Saturday Scholars . Gang Awareness
BOARD OF EDUCATION
JOSEPH D. CUMMINGS, Ph.D. . LARRY E. CUNNINGHAM. SHARON GILES
PATRICK A. JUDD. GREG R. SANDOVAL
SUPERINTENDENT
JOHN F. VUGRIN, Ph.D.
Chula Vista Elementary School District
DATE:
December 16, 1992
TO: All Staff
MEMORANDUM
c. V. ELtM
. SCHoo
RECEIVED L 0157.
DEe 2 1
El..A 1992
NN/NG & F
DEPAR>-MACILlI/c"
'ENr '
FROM: Superintendent's Office
SUBJ: NEW OFFICERS ELECTED TO BOARD OF EDUCATION:
ADOPTION OF BOARD OF EDUCATION REGULAR MEETING
DATES, TIME, AND PLACE FOR JANUARY THROUGH
NOVEMBER 1993
At its Organizational Meeting on December 15, 1992, the following Board
members were elected to office:
President
Vice President -
Clerk
Secretary
Larry E. Cunningham
Greg R. Sandoval
Joseph D. Cummings
John F. Vugrin
Regular Board meeting dates adopted for January through November 1993 are
as follows:
January 19, 1993
February 2, 1993
February 16, 1993
March 2, 1993
March 16, 1993
April 20, 1993
May 4, 1993
May 18,1993
June 8, 1993
June 22, 1993
July 13, 1993
August 10, 1993
September 7, 1993
September 21, 1993
October 5, 1993
October 19, 1993
November 16,1993
Meetings are held at 7:00 p.m. at the Education Center, 84 East "J" Street, Chula
Vista.
SH
cc: Board of Education
Clear View Council PTA
Chula Vista City Council
Sweetwater Union High School District
The San Diego Union-Tribune
The Star-News
Carol Coates, CSBA
CITY OF CIIULA VISTA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
FUNDING APPLICATION FOR 1993-94
NOTE: 11I/S APPLlCA110N IS DUE NO LATER T/lAN MARCil 1, 1993 AT 5
1'.111. AT TilE CITY OF CIWLA VISTA, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT, 276 FOURTIl AVE., CIIULA VISTA.
Program/Project Name:
Playqround Improvements - Otay School
Name of Organization:
Chula Vista Elementary School District
Contact Person: Ka te S hu rson
Title Director of Planning & Facilities
Address:__
Telephone
1. Amouut or Funding Rcqucslcd:
$ 25,000
2. Amount or 1992-93 CUBG Funding:
$
o
3. If this i~ an existing program, how many
years has it served Chula Vista residents?
years
4. Is this program physically located in Clmla Visla?
Yes
5. Describe the main goal(s), objectives, and activities or your organi7.ation:
6. Dcsc.-ibe thc spccific program for which funds are rcquested: (If you are only
,.cqucsting funds for gcncral organizational support, go to question H to).
Playground improvements to provide enhanced/expanded recreational
opportunities for students and area residents.
7. Why is this program needed in Chula Vista?:
Parks and recreational opportunities in western Chula Vista are limited.
These improvements would enhance/expand facilities on school site to
better serve both students and area residents.
8. Who will be providing the services? Brieny describe qualifications of key
staff and indicate their level of educationltraining:
9. Program Budget: Total: $ 25,000
(Include only those expenses directly related to the program for which funding is
requested).
CDBO
OTHER FUNDS
Salaries/Benefits:
$
$
Rent/Utilities:
Equipment/Supplies:
Olher
Olher
Olher
Subtotals:
$
$
10. Specify exactly how the CUBG funds will be used:
(1) Construct/install ballwall with A/C hardcourt.
(2) Construct lunch arbor to provide shade for lunch/picnic area.
(3) Repair and level turf playfield.
II. Please list the name and amount of other secured or potential sources of
funding fOl' thL~ specific program:
None.
12. Do you anticipate needing C1>BG funding for this program in subsequent
J'ears? Yes X No To maintain playfields.
Ir yes, how much funding will be needed each year?
1994-95 $ 2,500 1995-96 $ 3,000 1996-97 $ 3,500
13. Who will be served by your program and what are the boundaries of your
service aI'ea?
Students attending Otay School and area residents including baseball
and/or soccer leagues and groups.
14. How do people find out about your program? How do you do outreach?
Signage at the site.
15. 1>0 you assist clients to get to your program site or provide services out iu the
community?
No, other than regular school busing.
16. 1'01' this sJlccil1c Jlrognlln for which CDBG is rcqucstcd, estimatc thc total
IIl1mbc,' of:
a. Total c1i~l!!1! scrvcd 01' cstimatcd to be scned in:
1993-94
1992-93
1991-92
650+/- students plus many residents
and athletic groups.
h. Chula Vista ,'esidcnts scncd 01' cstimatcd to be servcd in:
1993-94 See "a" above.
1992-93
1991-92
c. Low-income clients scrved or cstimated to be scrved in:
(low-income household is defined as follows: Iperson=$23,150; 2person=$26,450;
3person =$29,750; 4person =$33,(50)
1993-94 See "a" above.
1992-93
1991-92
17. What methods will you use to account for the income level and other
dcmographic infonnation on your clients?
PLEASE A"lTACH THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
a) A PROGRAM BROCHURE OR FLYER (if you have one)
b) A CURRENT LIST OF YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS (one page)
c) A COMPLETE LIST OF CURRENT SOURCES OF REVENUE (one page)
CHULA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT
84 EAST J STREET. CHUlA VISTA, CA 91910 . (619) 425.9600 . FAX (619) 427.0463
GRADES KINDERGARTEN THROUGH SIX
DISTRICT PHilOSOPHY
"facll Child is an Individual of Great Worth and is Entitled to Develop to His or Her Fullest Potential."
MISSION STATEMENT
Our mission Is to provide a well.rounded education for our students by:
developing skills in reading, oral and written language, and mathematics.
stimulating a desire for life-long learning.
motivating the use of intelligence and reason.
promoting the use of effective study skills and work habits.
developing an awareness of one's relationship to society and the environment.
. providing inspiration to become productive citizens.
cultivating an appreciation for the Fine Arts.
nurturing their physical and emotional well-being.
BOARD-ADOPTED PRIORITIES
To Improve Students' Personal and Academic Progress.
To Enhance the learning and Working Environment.
To Strengthen Community Support for the Schools.
To Develop a Plan for a Balanced Budget.
To Provide for a Changing Student Population.
DISTRICT PROFilE
18,200 Students
1,700 Employees
22 Traditional Calendar Schools
Nine Single-Track, Year-Round Schools
One Five-Track, Year-Round School
Integrated Special Education Programs
Six State-Sponsored Preschools
One State-Sponsored Child Care Center
Before/After School Care at Many Schools
PROGRAM FEATURES
. literature-based language Arts
. Math/Science/ Physical Education
. History/Social Science
Multicultural Education
Fine Arts/lnstrumenlal Music
Extensive Special Education Programs
. Multisensory Approach to language Arts
Gifted and Talented Education
Transllional Second language Education
Technology Enhanced Instruction
. library/Media Centers at Each School
Child Care/Preschool at Some SIIes
Magnet Schools
Substance Abuse Prevention Education
- Comprehensive Staff Development Program
. Adolescent Growth Education
COMMUNITY
INVOLVEMENT
Parent Clubs/PT A . Volunteer/Grandparent Programs . Even Start
School Site Councils . Community Schools . Parent Education Programs
Partners-in-Education . S~turday Scholars . Gang Awareness
BOARD OF EDUCATION
JOSEPH D. CUMMINGS, Ph.D. . LARRY E. CUNNINGHAM' SHARON GILES
PATRICK A. JUDD' GREG A. SANDOVAL
SUPERINTENDENT
JOHN F. VUGRIN, Ph.D.
Chula Vista Elementary School District
DATE:
December 16, 1992
TO: All Staff
MEMORANDUM
C,V.ELtM
,SCHo
RECEIVED OL DIS].
DEr.
-"2179
EI..ANNING 92
D" &FACI
tPAR".. Li 1 It. 0
'wENr
FROM: Superintendent's Office
SUBJ: NEW OFFICERS ELECTED TO BOARD OF EDUCATION:
ADOPTION OF BOARD OF EDUCATION REGULAR MEETING
DATES, TIME, AND PLACE FOR JANUARY THROUGH
NOVEMBER 1993
At its Organizational Meeting on December 15, 1992, the following Board
members were elected to office:
President
Vice President -
Clerk
Secretary
Larry E. Cunningham
Greg R. Sandoval
Joseph D. Cummings
John F. Vugrin
Regular Board meeting dates adopted for January through November 1993 are
as follows:
January 19, 1993
February 2, 1993
February 16, 1993
March 2, 1993
March 16, 1993
April 20, 1993
May 4,1993
May 18,1993
June 8, 1993
June 22, 1993
July 13, 1993
August 10,1993
September 7,1993
September 21, 1993
October 5, 1993
October 19, 1993
November 16, 1993
Meetings are held at 7:00 p.m. at the Education Center, 84 East "J" Street, Chula
Vista.
SH
cc: Board of Education
Clear View Council PT A
Chula Vista City Council
Sweetwater Union High School District
The San Dieao Union-Tribune
The Star-News
Carol Coates, CSBA
~
\~
doard of ManagetTl€nl
1992 -'993
Larry Cunningham, Chair
VK-eChairs:
Pam Sm~h
Sandy Murphy
Susie Conners
Chuck Day
Mike Prade~
T. Pat Cavanaugh.
Secretary. T r€asurer
Penny Allen, Past Chair
Members:
Vince Acosta
I(en Baumgartner
'..kkie Beyer
:Jon Blind
Joanne Carson
I.A. Chantengco
~orma Colunga
Mlvin Cowherd
;reg Cox
Aary Lynn Deddeh
;eri Dillingham
Aike Finch
Joug Fuller
;e~h Gentry
~ Harder
. Harry
\jlfHauf
lobert Hildt
:afbara Hunsaker
lick Kau
:osemary Lane
rmando Martinez
an Mendez
eler Moore
alhy Parker
en Screeton
rt Sellgren
)hn Shockley Jr.. M.D.
ruee Sloan
31riciaSmHh
el Taunt
. John Vugrin
cWilliams
'fitage Club
?nny & David Allen
lris & Sandy Chase
iUiam Cheverton
,I & Midge Cowherd
Itty Erickson
lug & Barbara Fuller
JO Sim
'iaSmrth
13 Williams, Execulive Director
South Bay Family YMCA
50 Four1h Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
(619) 4228354 FAX (619) 422-4412
January 22, ] 993
Mr. John Goss
City Manager
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
ChuIa Vista, CA. 91910
Dear Mr. Goss:
The YMCA hilS been meeting community needs since it first opened its doors in
1960. Last year alone we served over 5,000 participants under the age of 18 in
programs such as Child Care, Day Camp, Youth Sports, Gymnastics and
Literacy. Having reached a point in the history of the South Bay Family YMCA,
when meeting the needs of the present and future residents seems to include the
need for a full facility, we believe a building project will greatly enhance the
YMCA's ability to serve more families throughout the city. As you are aware,
Chula Vista has experienced a tremendous amount of growth. There is currently
a lack of adequate community 'facilities. The YMCA is positioned to help meet the
need for these facilities.
On behalf of the Board of Manageme;Jt of the South Bay Family YMCA, wf.J!le
requesting CDBG Capital Improvem, ,e. nt funds for Phase I of our YMCe, facj~~
construction ro'ect. S ecificall , we would like' . 'de~
ear fundin commitment of 25000D er ear for construction of the
swimming pool. The plan for Phase I includes a 10.938 square foot qu i~'
Center with lap pool, instructional pool and therapy pool for the physically
challenged. In addition, plans include 4 locker/shower rooms, an exercise room,
cardiovllscular and strength training facilities, multi-purpose room, and meeting
space. Total estimatea cost of Phase I is $5,500,000. The City's commitment
would oE.!Y be 20%.
The CDBG Capital Improvement Funds would help to fund the construction of
the Aquatic Center. Many activities ~"free learn to swim" weeks wilI--Qe
provided in the Aquatic Center at no cost to low income familie:). A full range of
programs for seniors will also be provided. The YMCA maintains the philosophy
that no one is turned away from programs because of inability to pay reR-ular
fees. We have an aggressive Financial Assistance program to help us reach low
income families.
Mission Statement: "The South Bay Family YMCA IS dedicated to improvmg the quality of human Ide and to helpmg
all people realize the/( fullest potential as children of God through development of the Spirit. mmd and body"
The South Bay Family YMCA has been a cornerstone of youth activities over the
years in Chula Vista. We have adopted a philosophy of high quality, low cost
programming that is driven by the YMCA mission. Our objective is to serve as
many people as possible and become a community focal point relating not only to
youth and physical programs but also for community workshops, forums and
meetings.
We believe a partnership between the City of Chula Vista and the YMCA will
help to ensure that every Chula Vista resident can participate in YMCA programs
regardless of their economic circumstances.
We urge your favorable consideration of this request and thank you for the
opportunity to present this proposal.
Sincerely,
~~..
Larry Cunningham
Board Chairman
~~
Tina Williams
Executive Director
cc: Mayor Tim Nader
City Council
April 6, 1993
TO:
George Krempl, Deputy City Manager
Teri Enos, Principal (\,
David Gustafson, Assistant Comm. Dev. Director (jfJ
VIA:
FROM:
David Harris, Community Development Specialist
SUBJECT:
Request by South Bay Family YMCA for $1,000,000 of CDBG funding for the
construction of an aquatics facility in Rancho Del Rey
The purpose of the memorandum is to provide you with information regarding the eligibility of
the proposed YMCA aquatics center for CDBG funding. Although the aquatics facility will not
be located in a low-income census tract, it could qualify as a "direct benefit" activity if it serves
at least 51 % low-income persons for a minimum of 5 years. Under HUD guidelines, all senior
citizens and disabled individuals are presumed to be low-income and automatically count toward
the 51% requirement.
The service area of the South Bay Family includes 208,000 people residing in the cities of Chula
Vista and National City and the community of Bonita; about 46 % of this population is classified
as low-income. The YMCA's mission includes on-going outreach to low-income families and
senior citizens. No person is turned away from activities offered by the YMCA due to inability
to pay. In addition, memberships will be available on a sliding scale so that many low-income
families will be able to become members of the YMCA.
The Director of the YMCA believes that the YMCA aquatics facility will easily meet the 51 %
low-income goal. The YMCA plans to bus senior citizens from Norman Park center and senior
housing complexes to the aquatics facility. Children from throughout the service area will be
able to participate in swim lessons. A specially-designed therapy pool will be available for use
by disabled persons.
As far as monitoring the usage of the aquatics center, the YMCA will be using a "bar-code"
identification system to track users of tr.e facility. Each time a person uses the facility, their
card with the "bar-code" will be scanned. Everyone who uses the facility on a regular basis or
is part of a scheduled activity will be required to fill out an income statement (and sign a liability
waiver). The only ones who will not be required to fill out the income statement will be guests
of members and infrequent "day-users."
Based on this information, it is conceivable that the YMCA will be able to meet the 51 % criteria
and is therefore eligible for CDBG funding.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
FUNDING APPLICATION FOR 1993-94
NOTE: THIS APPLICATION IS DUE NO LATER THAN MARCH 1, 1993 AT 5
P.M. AT THE CIIT OF CHULA VISTA, COMMUNIIT DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT, 276 FOURTH AVE., CHULA VISTA.
Program/Project Name:
Border Environmental Commerce Zone (BECZ) Coordinator
Name of Organization:
City of Chula Vista
Contact Person: Cberyl Dye
Title Economic Development Manager
Address: 276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Telephone
1. Amount of Funding Requested:
$ 100,000
2~ Amount of 1992-93 CDBG Funding:
$
-0-
3. If this is an existing program, how many
years has it served Chula Vista residents?
N/ A years
4. Is this program physically located in Chula Vista?
Yes (includes Chula Vista)
5. Describe the main goal(s), objectives, and .activities of your organization:
The goal of the proposed BECZ is to create a border-oriented, state-designated incentive
zone which offers special incentives/assistance to environmentally sound businesses (as
defined by the draft concept paper, attached). At the time of this submission, a subcommittee
of the Council's Environmental Task Force intends to recommend that the City provide
CDBG seed money to hire a BECZ Coordinator to implement the zone program, including an
Environmental Business Incubator program.
6. Describe the specific pl'ogram for which funds aloe requested: (If you are only
requesting funds for general organizational support, go to question # 10),
The BECZ is currently envisioned to be administered by a multi-jurisdictional Joint Powers
Authority (JPA) which sets policy and contracts with a separate non-profit to administer
the day-to-day program. This application requests funds to hire a Zone Coordinator and
to pay for related contractual services.
7, Why is this program needed in Chula Vista?:
To encourage one of the fastest-growing industries of the next decade to locate in Chula
Vista, thereby creating new jobs, generating tax revenues, and attracting "clean-up"
technologies and "clean" industries.
8. Who will be providing the services? Briefly. describe qualifications of key
staff and indicate their level of education/training:
The funds would pay for a BECZ Coordinator who would be staff to the proposed non-profit
'~hich would be contracted by the JPA of which Chula Vista would be a part.
9, Program Budget: Total: $ 100,000
(Include only those expenses directly related to the program for which funding is
requested).
CDBG
OTHER FUNDS
Salaries/Benefits:
$ $
The $100,000 is a rough estimate of the cost of the
BECZ's salary, overhead, and the cost of needed support
services such as attorney fees and clerical support.
Rent/Utilities:
Equipment/Supplies:
Other
Other
Other
Subtotals:
$
$
10. Specify exactly how the CnnG funds will be used:
The program is currently at a conceptual level. However, it is envisioned that the BECZ
Coordinator's role will be to establish the JPA and non-profit, to refine the nature
of the BECZ program, to solicit public and private funds, to implement the Environmental
Tech Resource Center/Incubator program and to seek state legislative authority as needed.
1 I. Please list the name and amount of other secured or potential sources of
funding for this specific program:
Potential sources for matching the initial personnel costs include the participating
JPA members. Possible program funding sources include the state (via new legilsation),
the federal government (via Clinton proposals) and private corporations.
12. Do you anticipate needing CDBG funding for this program in subsequent
years? Yes X No .
If yes, how much funding will be needed each year?
1994-95 $ 100,000 1995-96$ 100,000 1996-97 $
13. Who will be served by your program and what are the boundaries of your
service area?
See attached Draft Concept Paper.
14. How do people find out about your program? How do you do outreach?
The BECZ would be marketed by the JPA entities and the state as well as the contracted
non-profit administrative entity. It is anticipated that job outreach will be a key
element, similar in fashion to the state's Enterprise Zone program.
15. Do you assist clients to get to your program site or provide services out in the
community?
N/A
]6. For this specific prog"am for which CDnG is requested, estimate the total
number of: It is not possible to estimate the number of jobs to be created
at this time.
a. Total c1i.~nts served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94
1992-93
1991-92
b. Chula Vista residents served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94
1992-93
1991-92
c. Low-income clients served or estimated to be served in:
(low-income household is defined as follows: lperson=$23,150; 2person=$26,450;
3person=$29,750; 4person=$33,050)
1993-94
1992-93
1991-92
17, What methods will you use to account for the income level and other
demographic information on your clients?
N/A
PLEASE A IT ACH THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
a) A PROGRAM BROCHURE OR FLYER (if you have one)
b) A CURRENT LIST OF YOUR BOARD OF DffiECTORS (one page)
c) A COMPLETE LIST OF CURRENT SOURCES OF REVENUE (one page)
DRAFf CONCEPT PAPER
BORDER ENVIRONMENTAL COMMERCE ZONE (BECZ)
Prepared by Subcommittees on Financial Incentives and Eligibility Criteria
April 26, 1993
This paper has been prepared by staff to outline the proposed Border Environmental Commerce Zone
(BECZ) as currently envisioned by the Chula Vista Environmental Zone Task Force Subcommittees on
Financial Incentives and Eligibility Criteria. This paper is subject to further revision and is scheduled
to be presented to the entire Task Force on April 30, 1993.
I. BORDER ENVIRONMENTAL COMMERCE ZONE (BECZ) GOALS
The proposed BECZ' will be designed to assist environmental technologies/services and thus
strengthen an emerging, high-growth-potential economic base (see "Future of Environmental
Industries," Exhibit A). More specifically, the BECZ is intended to create an environment in
which innovative, minimal-impact processes and/or end-use products can be developed and
utilized to help clean our air, water and land by providing incentives for companies that
manufacture products or provide services that are environmentally beneficial, in a manner that
is environmentally friendly.
The BECZ is envisioned to address the proposed North American Free Trade Agreement
(NAFTA) in terms of attracting both "clean" industries and "clean-up" technologies to the border
area in anticipation of increased demand for these technologies and services on both sides of the
D.S./Mexico border.
Finally, the BECZ is envisioned as a "testing ground" for a partnership of local, regional, state
and federal entities to join together in a Demonstration Program. Based upon the Pilot Program's
experience, the program can be modified and replicated throughout the state. The Zone will
bring the entities of Chula Vista, City of San Diego, County of San Diego, Imperial Beach, and
National City together in a border-oriented, regional approach which utilizes local incentives and
resources as well as state-enabling legislation and resources. BECZ initiatives will support
existing and proposed state economic development and environmental technology related efforts,
including the California Enterprise Zone and Recycling Zone Programs (already operating in San
Diego County) and the state's CalEPA Environmental Technology Partnership Program, and will
support national efforts such as economic conversion/technology transfer programs.
II. BORDER ENVIRONMENTAL COMMERCE ZONE (BECZ) OBJECTIVES
In order to accomplish the above goals, the BECZ will be designed to:
1. Attract existing environmentally sound businesses.
2. Encourage the start up of new businesses generating innovative technology.
3. Encourage marketable international trade and export of environmental technologies.
4. Encourage the expansion of environmentally sound businesses having a significant
economic impact
Page 1
2.
Private co . ~ani~S9onate;:: re ediation inVeStI.' gation and clean-up serv. ices in exchange for
eqUity artlclpatlOn. / /
Th ankers CDC m es loans to private buyers of the cleaned up/property in return for
. /
~RA credit. . / /
The cleaned up~roperty generates income for the Incubator Program and "investors."
3.
4.
VII. PROGRAM COSTS/FUNDING SOURCES
Costs
The Zone as proposed would require very significant funding commitments. In the immediate
stages, funds would be needed to pay for a full-time Zone Coordinator to develop and refine the
overall Zone concept, to assemble a team of experts, to mobilize the participating entities and
establish the organizational structure to identify and secure funding sources, to identify and secure
a location for the ETC/Incubator, and to pursue State legislation as needed. A possible source
of seed money under consideration for recommendation is the anticipated new Community
Development Block Grant monies to be allocated to the City of Chula Vista under President
Clinton's Economic Development stimulus package. (The City of Chula Vista expects to receive
approximately $1 million in new CDBG funds.)
Costs of the Zone program's overall implementation and management are difficult to identify at
this time. However, funding is anticipated to be needed at a minimum for the following:
1. ETC/Incubator
. Land acquisition and improvement
. Facility construction
. Equipment
. Operating and maintenance costs
. Staffing
Incubator Manager
Clerical support
2. Technical and Financial Advisory Councils
. Staffing (to provide support for such activities as Incubator tenant screening,
background checks, monitoring)
. Consultant services
3. Environmental Border Zone IPA
. Staffing (to support public meetings, bond issuances, and general administration)
Funding Sources
Funding is anticipated to be secured from both public and private sources. Currently, the Task
Force envisions the City of Chula Vista and/or other participating entities contributing up-front
seed money for a BECZ Coordinator as discussed previously. Assuming funding is allocated up
front, the BECZ Coordinator and team will further develop and implement the initial
ETRC/Incubator program.
Page 10
Subsequent revenues are anticipated to be a combination of state, federal, local and private
funding with the emphasis on private corporate dollars. Further investigation of potential
governmental grant programs and private funding sources is necessary to develop a budget
strategy. Possible federal sources include DOC, DOE, EDA, DOT, DOL with an emphasis on
President Clinton's Economic Stimulus/Economic Conversion programs. Possible state sources
include the California Environmental Partnership Program as well as specific direct financial
incentives via state tax benefits for indivIdual businesses. Other state-related possibilities include
such items as targeting revenues from Air Quality Management Districts, waiving state bond
issuance fees, etc.
Potential corporate funding could come from budgeted Outplacement Programs, which currently
account for significant dollars.
The ETRC/lncubator facility(ies) itself could be acquired through purchasing, leasing or private
donations. Potential funding sources include federal, state, and local governments, private
corporations, foundations, and venture capital. Financing mechanisms could include:
. public/private partnership
. debt financing
. equity financing
. cash or in-kind contributions
. grants or loans
. public stock offerings
. limited R&D partnership
VIII. STATE LEGISLATION
The Task Force currently recommends immediately pursuing state legislation which would at a
minimum, identify the Environmental Technology Commercial Zone as a state authorized
regionally based incentive zone. The legislation would identify the IP A and non-profit
ETC/lncubator program, and establish a legislative framework under which State Enterprise
ZonelRecycling Zone incentives can be linked and additional State Environmental Commerce
Zone incentives developed. As the Environmental Zone is further developed by the BECZ
Coordinator, additional legislative authority may be requested.
IX. SUMMARY OF PROPOSED RECOMMENDATIONS
A brief summary of the Focus Group's recommendations as they are expected to go forward to
the Task Force is as follows:
1) Authorize a three year annual allocation in City of Chula Vista CDBG funds to hire a
full-time BECZ Coordinator and related consulting services (e.g. attorney) to fully
develop and implement the Zone program. (Such an allocation would be contingent upon
receipt of "new" CDBG monies under the President's Economic Stimulus Package;
currently projected to be $l:t million.)
2) File Articles of Incorporation for a "501C3" Non-profit organization to act as the umbrella
administrative entity for the ETRC/lncubator Program. (Note: The individual filer of the
Page 11
articles of incorporation would constitute the Board until the full Board is appointed; the
initial Board member could be the Chula Vista City Manager.)
Identify the composition by category of expertise and geographic representation of the
non-profit Board. (Note: Appointment to the Board could be tied to financial
participation.)
3) Form a Joint Power Authority in conjunction with National City, Imperial Beach, City of
San Diego, County of San Diego and City of Chula Vista to coordinate the multiple
jurisdictions' participation, with the capacity to issue tax-exempt bonds. (NOTE:
Appointment could be tied to financial participation.)
4) Submit legislation seeking state designation of the JP A as a Border Environmental
Commerce Zone, and designating the Zone and the Environmental Technology Research
CenterlIncubator Program as a State Pilot Project. (Note: Linkage with the Silicon
Valley ETRC/Incubator Program which is also in its embryonic stage should be
considered.)
5) Pursue federal funding.
6) Pursue State legislation authorizing specific State incentives for BECZ eligible businesses.
In terms of timing, it is recommended that Items #1, 2 & 3 be addressed initially and
concurrently, with the other items to follow.
WPC r:\home\commdev\791.93
Page 12
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
FUNDING APPLICATION FOR 1993-94
NOTE: THIS APPLICATION IS DUE NO LATER THAN MARCIl 1, 1993 AT 5
P.M. AT THE ClIT OF CHULA VISTA, COMMUNIIT DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT, 276 FOURTH AVE., CHULA VISTA.
Program/Project Name; High Tech/Biotech Zone EIR
Name of Organization; City of Chula Vista
Contact Person; Cheryl Dye
Title Economi c Development Manager
Address; 276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 9191D
Telephon
1. Amount of Funding Requested:
$ 100,000
2~ Amount of 1992-93 CnBG Funding:
$ N/A
3. If this is an existing program, how many
years has it served ChuIa Vista residents?
N/ A years
4, Is this program physically located in Chula Vista?
Yes
5. Describe the main goal(s), objectives, and.activities of your organization:
The goal of the proposed High/Biotech Zone, to be located at the EastLake Business
Center, is to encourage and facilitate the location of qualifying light industry,
to this Chula Vista Business Park in order to create new jobs and generate new tax
revenues.
6. DCSCl-ibe the specific [ll-ogram for which funds are requested: (If you ,u-e only
requesting funds for general organizational support, go to questioll # 10J.
Funds are requested to partially pay for an up-front "master" EIR for EastLake'.s
Phase II Business Center. The EIR scope and cost are yet to be finalized. These
funds are intended to match funds from EastLake Development Company.
7. Why is this program needed in Chula Vista?:
An "up-front", "master" EIR will address anticipated impacts of high tech and biotech/
biomed firms locating anywhere within the park. The intent is to save individual
firms time and money-and thus to provide a special incentive to choose Chula Vista.
8. Who will be providing the services? Briefly. describe qualifications of key
staff and indicate their level of education/training:
The EIR would be administered by the City's environment~staff via a contract(s) for
services.
9. Program Budget: Total: $ To be determined.
(Include only those expenses directly related to the program for which funding is
requested) .
CDBG
OTHER FUNDS
Salaries/Benefits:
$
$
Rent/Utilities:
Equipment/Supplies:
Other
Other
Other
Subtotals:
$
$
The EIR is estimated to cost $100,000 to $200,000; both scope and cost are currently
being evaluated.
10. Specify exactly how the CDIIG funds will be used:
See number 6.
II. Please list the name and amount of other secured or potential sources of
funding for this specific program:
It is anticipated that additional funding will be provided by EastLake Development
Company. The City and developer cost-sharing formula has not yet been determined,
as the program is still in its conceptual stage.
12. Do you anticipate needing CDBG funding for this progra~ in subsequent
years? Yes No X
If yes, how much funding will be needed each year?
1994-95 $ 1995-96 $ 1996-97 $
13. Who will be served by your program and what are the boundaries of your
serv ice a rea?
The entire City will benefit from job creation and tax revenue generation.
14. How do people find out about your program? How do you do outreach?
The program itself will be marketed proactively by the City. It is anticipated that
employee outreach will be conducted by the individual employers in coordination with
local job service providers (e.g., Sweetwater Union High School District, Southwestern
Co 11 ege) .
15. Do you assist clients to get to your program site or provide services out in the
community?
N/A
16. For" (Iris specific p'"ogralll for whiclr CDBG is requested, estimate (he total
number of: There will be an estimated 5,300 jobs created at project build-out*.
a. Tot<!L(~Eents served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94
1992-93
1991-92
b. Chula Vista residents served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94
1992-93
1991-92
c. Low-income clients served or estimated to be served in:
(low-income household is defined as follows: Iperson =$23, 150; 2person =$26,450;
3person =$29,750; 4person =$33,050)
Majority of jobs anticipated to be light
industrial, assembly. 1993-94
1992-93
1991-92
17. What methods will you use to account for the income level and other
demographic information on your clients?
PLEASE ATTACH THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
a) A PROGRAM BROCHURE OR FLYER (if you have one)
b) A CURRENT LIST OF YOUR BOARD OF DffiECTORS (one page)
c) A COMPLETE LIST OF CURRENT SOURCES OF REVENUE (one page)
*Based on .004 employees per square foot of employment park, 30% lot coverage,
and 100 acres.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
PUBLIC SERVICES FUNDING APPLICATION FOR 1992 - 1993
Program/Project Name: Chula vista Fair Housinq Proqram
Provider Organization(s): Fair Housinq Council of San Dieqo with
assistance from the Communi tv Service
Center for the Disabled and Resident
Relations of California
Contact: Tamara Sockev
Business number:
Title: Proqram Coordinator
Address:
1. Amount of funding requested:
$ 29.000
$ 40.000
2. Amount of 1992-93 CDBG Funding:
3. If this is an existing program, how many years has it served
Chula vista residents? one
4. Is this program physically located in Chula Vista? Offices
are not. however presentations. complaint processinq. testinq.
and mediation services will be performed in Chula Vista on an
onqoinq basis.
5. Describe the main goal(s), objectives and activities of your
organization:
Goal #1:
Provide comprehensive efficient and effective
resources for all housing issues.
To offer a wide-range of housing services to
encompass a diverse population of housing
consumers and providers of housing using a
single source.
Goal #2:
Objective #1:
Identify callers needs and provide appropriate
counseling, negotiation services or complaint
processing for fair housing and other housing
issues.
Objective #2:
Objective #3:
Activities:
To educate consumers and providers to fair
housing and landlord/tenant laws and practices;
and
to perform testing for fair housing complaints
in Chula vista.
a. All materials distributed will be
identified with the name, "Chula Vista
Fair Housing Program" and the hotline
number.
b. Promote the Chula vista's Fair Housing
services through press releases and
articles in local newspapers and media.
c. Assess, investigate and file complaints
when claims of illegal discrimination are
reported.
d. Offer bilingual mediation/negotiation
services for both fair housing and rental
issues.
e. specifically target the disabled community
for fair housing/landlord tenant outreach.
f. Sponsor a Fair Housing event for the
residents of Chula vista during Fair
Housing month. (i.e. poster, essay contest)
6. Describe the specific program for which funds are requested:
The specific program is to provide Fair Housing Services for
the city of Chula vista. See #5 for specific details of what
services will be provided.
7. Why Chula vista needs these programs:
a. Fair Housing services are mandated by the Federal
Government to every city or principality receiving CDBG
funding.
b. To increase fair housing awareness, activities and
resources for Chula vista residents experiencing or
practicing discrimination.
c. To continue and provide renters and landlords with
landlord/tenant services. (Chula vista has an estimated
22,300 renter occupied dwellings.) This is 47% of
Chula vista's total occupied housing. 1990 stats
d. Over 40% of Chula vista's population is Spanish-speaking
and the Fair Housing council of San Diego is the only
agency in San Diego which provides comprehensive fair
housing and landlord tenant services to persons who
are monolingual(Spanish).
4
8. Who will be providing the services? Briefly describe
qualifications of key staff and indicate their level of
education and training:
Tamara Sockey & Staff:
Executive Director for the Fair Housing council with
three years experience in Fair Housing investigation and
resolution.
B.S. in Education majoring in Science.
certified Housing Counselor through the National
Federation of Housing Counselors.
Formal mediation/dispute resolution training from the
community Mediation Center of San Diego.
Fair Housing Test Coordinator for housing audits in the
city and county of San Diego
Tester and Test Coordinator training by the U.S.
Department of Justice
Numerous presentations to a variety of consumers and
providers regarding all protected classes of Fair Housing
Fair Housing trainer for Accredited Resident Manager
course and instructor for Fair Housing Property Management
training.
Sharon Johnson & Staff:
Executive Director of Resident Relations of California
with 6 years of experience in dispute resolution of
landlord/tenant complaints.
Expert of landlord/tenant laws for the State of California
certified by community Mediation Center of San Diego in
formal mediation training
Numerous presentations made including, annual Accredited
Resident Manager's course, certified Apartment Manager's
course, the Regional occupation program's course and
U.C.S.D.'s property management extension course.
S years experience as a paralegal for a property
management law firm.
S years as vice President of a tenant screening company
Experience as property manager and marketing consultant
Member of Institute of Real Estate Management, National
Federation of Housing Counselors and Intercultural
Outreach Committee.
patricia Yeaqer & Staff:
Executive Director of the community Service Center of San
Diego
Promotion of Access to Higher Education for persons with
disabilities at, Community college of Allegheny county,
and Auraria Higher Education Center which serves
Metropolitan College and University Of Colorado, Denver.
5
Masters degree in Rehabilitation Counseling from West
Virginia University and has been hearing impaired since
the age of two.
9. Program Budget Total $ 29.000
salaries/benefits: $ 23,090.00
Rent/Util i ties: $ 2,400.00
Equipment/Supplies: $ 200.00
(Postage)
Printing: $ 1,500.00
Poster Prizes: $ 970.00
Travel: $ 490.00
Cater/Rm. Rental: $ 350.00
Total $ 29,000.00
10. Specify exactly how the CDBG funds will be used:
a. 4 fair housing articles
b. Distribution of Fair Housing literature
c. 6 fair housing presentations(includes disabled community)
d. organize and conduct the fair housing event(i.e. poster
contest, essay contest)
e. Provide landlord/tenant counseling and negotiation services
f. Fair Housing counseling and investigation services
g. Housing Counseling hotline
h. Program coordination/administration
11. Please list the name and amount of other secured or potential
sources of funding for this specific program: None
12. Do you anticipate needing CDBG funding for this program in
subsequent years? Yes x No
How much funding will be needed each year?
1993 - 1996 Same level of fundinq for same level of services
13. Who will be served by your program or organization and what are
the boundaries of your service area?
with an estimated 22.300 rental units in Chula vista accountinq
for 47% of occupied housinq units. renters and housinq
providers all of whom could potentially benefit from the
6
services of this Proqram. A larqe number of persons with
disabilities live in the Chula vista area Capproximately
14.000 persons have some type of disability as reported by
census data.) This does not include many persons who did not
report a disability or did not have an opportunity in this
random samplinq.
14. How do people find out about your program? How do you do
outreach?
Residents of Chula vista will continue to access the services
throuqh a toll-free number provided for residents of Chula
exclusively. BilinqualCEnqlish/spanish) counselors will
provide the intake. Outreach will be provided in the followinq
ways:
Community presentations
Fair Housing Poster Contest
Distribution of English/Spanish materials
Word-of-Mouth
Articles published in media
Hotline number distributed to social service agency
mailing list
If City of Chula vista agrees; hotline listed under
city offices in white pages of phonebook.
PUblic Service Announcements
15. Do you assist clients to get to your program site or provide
services in the community?
Maioritv of services can be conducted bV phone. however fair
housinq cases which reauire meetinqs outside of the office
can be arranqed when special circumstances are involved.
Presentations are done in the city of Chula Vista. testinq.
and Poster contest activities.
16. Total Number of clients served:
Parts a'l b. and c.: Not applicable
17. Is there anything else you would like to explain about your
organization or program?
This program would provide a more effective and efficient way
of handling housing problems that involve discrimination.
Rather that having three agencies with complimentary abilities
work separately this project allows a cohesion of resources to
be made available to the residents of Chula vista.
7
Sources of Funding:
FAIR HOUSING COUNCIL OF SAN DIEGO:
city of San Diego - CDBG
Housing Commission
Membership and Donations
Federal Government Agreement
city of Chula vista - CDBG
RESIDENT RELATIONS OF CA:
City of Chula vista - CDBG
City of National City - CDBG
S.D. Housing Commission
Membership Drive- $ projection unavailable
COMMUNITY SERVICE CENTER FOR THE DISABLED
State AB204 program core services
State CBA
city of San Diego
CDBG-funding
Federal-Title Seven
corporations/Foundations
Membership/Private Individuals
8
$88,000
5,000
8,000
17.200
$118,200
$15,400
$ 4,400
$10,000
$29,800
$322,000
49,000
23,000
40,000
54,000
5,000
$493,000
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
FUNDING APPLICATION FOR 1993-94
A
.z~
NOTE: THIS APPLICATION IS DUE NO LATER THAN MARCH 1, 1993
CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, 276
CHULA VISTA.
,Frs ]993
(\ r".~-r: _.'
l.ntnl11nt!iJ~ tl;.q~erJ
'. 'i'V",
D.'!I';,!", OPInen,'
,.~ '."If"t
AT5 P.M. AT THE
FOURTH AVENUE
PROGRAM/PROJECT NAME: CHULA VISTA HUMAN SERVICES COUNCIL
NAME OF ORGANIZATION: CHULA VISTA HUMAN SERVICES COUNCIL (CVHSCl
SOUTH BAY FAMILY YMCA*
CONTACT PERSON: PAMELA SMITH TITLE: CHAIRPERSON CVHSC
ADDRESS:
TELEPHONE:
1. Amount of Funding Requested: $21.000
2. Amount of 1991-92 CDBG Funding: $~.OOO
3. If this is an existing program, how many years has
it served Chula vista residents? 5
4. Is this program physically located in Chula vista? YES
5. Describe the main goal(s), objectives, and activities of your
organization:
The Human Services Council was established in 1988 by the Chula
vista City Council. We have established a foundation and network
for 150 social service agencies, schools, churches and non-profit
providers to improve the coordination and communication among
providers in our community.
Provide a forum for all human service agencies operating in
Chula vista to discuss issues.
Identify and define unmet human service needs in community.
Coordinate efforts of various agencies to address unmet
needs.
Advocate for Chula vista to assure it receives fair share of
Federal, State, County, City, united Way and other human
service resources.
Conduct special studies and keep City, County, United Way,
and other agencies informed on human service needs and issues
in Chula vista.
Discuss opportunities to share information, clients, office
space, insurance, volunteers, public relations opportunities.
Seek outside funding opportunities not so easily available to
individual agencies.
*The South Bay Family YMCA will be the fiscal and
administrative agent for the grant.
6. Describe the specific program for which funds are requested: (If you
are only requesting funds for general organizational support, go to
question #10).
To hire a part time employee to work for the CVHSC. This person will
handle forums, newsletter, work with subject specific sub-committees
(D&A, Domestic Violence, LatchKey, etc.), update resource directory,
etc.
7. Why is this program needed in Chula vista?
CVHSC provides leadership and coordination of all human service
providers in Chula vista. CVHSC has worked closely and specifically
with providers in pursuing funding to help support his programs and
helped to improve communication and coordination, thus avoiding
duplicating of services and sharing of resources.
8. Who will be providing the services? Briefly describe qualifications of
key staff and indicate their level of education/training:
staff person will work for the CVHSC and will report to the Chair. CVHSC
members are heads of agencies and leaders in the human service field.
9. Program Budget (Include only those expenses directly related to
providing your specific program):
Total: $ 21.000
CDBG
OTHER FUNDS
Salaries/Benefits:
$16,000
$
Rent/utilities:
In Kind
Equipment/Supplies:
2,000
Other
Mileaqe
500
Other
printinq
2,000
Other
Traininq
500
Subtotals
$
$
10. Specify exactly how the CDBG funds will be used:
To employ one or two part time people to work for the CVHSC.
11. Please list the name and amount of other secured or potential sources of
funding for this specific program:
$4,000 from the City of Chula vista and much in-kind support from CVHSC.
12. Do you anticipate needing CDBG funding for this program in subsequent
years? Yes X No
If yes, how much funding will be needed each year?
1994-95 $ 23.000 1995-96 $ 25.000 1996-1997 $27.000
13. Who will be served by your program or organization and what are the
boundaries of your service area?
All human service providers will benefit from the work the CVHSC does.
The activities have grown so numerous and expansive the volunteer board
can no longer handle. This employee would work for the board and
improve the communication and coordination of all providers and be a Key
person in community resource development.
14. How do people find out about your program? How do you do outreach?
PUblicity, presentations, newsletters, public forums.
15. Do you assist clients to get to your program site or provide services
out in the community?
NO
16a. Total clients served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94
1992-93
1991-92
16b. Chula vista residents served or estimated to be served in:
1993-94
1992-93
1991-92
16c. Low income clients served or estimated to be served in:
(low-income is defined as follows: 1 person=$23,150;
2 persons=$26,450; 3 persons=29,750; 4 persons=$33,050)
1993-94
1992-93
1991-92
17. What methods will you use to account for the income level and other
demographic information on your clients?
PLEASE ATTACH THE FOLLOWING ITEMS:
a) A PROGRAM BROCHURE OR FLYER (if you have one)
b) A CURRENT LIST OF YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS
* c) A COMPLETE LIST OF YOUR CURRENT SOURCES OF REVENUE
* We receive $4000 from City Council for general operation such as
newsletter, postage and forum expenses. Much in-kind and other support
is received from CVHSC members.
CHULA VISTA HUMAN SERVICES COUNCIL
Pamela B. Smith, Chair
Social Security Administration
Chula vista CA 91910
vista
91910
Tris Hubbard
Staff Associate
Chula vista CA 91910
Chula vista CA 91911
San Diego CA 92123
Nancy Hitchcock
Villa Boni
Bonita CA 91902
Emerald Randolph
~925
Emma Abutin, R.N.
~c Health Center
Chula Vista CA 91910-4525
Riley
Dept
Chula vista CA 91910
Dr. Mary Anne Stro
Sweetwater Union High School District
~91911
Director
Chula vista CA 91910
Ostapinski, L.C.S.W.
San Diego CA 92108
Bonita CA 91902
Chula vista CA 91910
Tim Nader, Mayor
City Hall
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, Ca 91910
John D. Goss, City Manager
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula vista, CA 91910
Diane Flint
Vice President Manager
Bank of America
~A 91910
[fJ REGIONAL TASK FORCE ON THE HOMELESS
d
Mar)' Cobckro, Ph.D.
Trnvelers Aid Sociel.l-" Co-Chair
Supervisor Leon L. Williams
County of San Diego Co-Owir
Mayor Susan Golding
City of San Diego
Supervisor John MacDonald
County of San Diego
Dawson Dowty
United Way of ~ Diego Counry
DlIVid Janssen
eOl/my of San Diego
Jack McGrory
City of San Diego
Glenn Allison
Epi~opal Communil)' Services
David Allsbrook
Centre City Development Corporation
Man Case
St. Vincent de Paul Village
Pam Hall
San Diego Community Foundation
Larn Johnson
Unite"d Wa)' of San Diego County
Aurelia Kobl'
S.D. Consoniwn &. P .I.e.
Julie' Kolker
City of Escondida
Victor Kops, Ph.D.
Central Cil)" Association
Chris Kuebler
La Jolla Presbyterian Church
Tom Leslie
San Diego Cify Homeless Coord.
Jim Lundgren
SERJJobs For Progress, Inc.
Dan Marcus
South Bay Conuriunity Services
Dennis Martinek, Ph.D.
Professor, Palomar College:
Elizabeth Morris
San Diego City Housing Commission
Larr,. Murnane
Anome)', Peterson & Price
Marl "'tel
Interfaith Shc:lterNetworl:
Dave Owen
San Diego Counry Farm Bureau
Gabriel Rodriguez
S.D.County Housing & Cmnry Dc:vl.
Art Stevens
East CounlY Coal. for the Homeless
Georgia Tale
S.D. County Dc:pt. Social Services
Henr~.' Tarke, LCSW
S.D. Count)' Dc:pt. Hc:a1~ Services
Ron Thurlow
N. Coastal Coal. for the Homeless
Robert Van Keuf'UI
Vietnam Vetemu of San Diego
Frank Landerville
Projecl Director
March 19. 1993
00 ~
~::!
::0
00 ~ l'TI
The Honorable Tim Nader ,-n n
me;
Mayor ;:Or "-> jTI
==-:;c \0
City of Chula Vista t.nr-- <
276 Fourth Ave. 01> :x:> I'T1
-",,'::' ex> 0
--r;;-;:
Chula VISta, CA 91910 rJ:::"; h:
r;;}-,. (Xl
Dear Mayor Nader:
For eight years the Regional Task Force on the Homeless has been
engaged in a countywide effort to reduce the incidence and impact of
homelessness. We are writing this letter to identify how the Task Force
benefits us all as active partners in this important regional organization.
The Regional Task Force is a group of local government, nonprofit
service providers, and community groups concerned with
homelessness. Some examples of its work includes the countywide
Interfaith Shelter Network; a homeless day shelter; and a residential
hotel (SRO) preservation program. However, much of its day to day
work consists of important regional reports and special studies, which
are regularly incorporated into local documents such as Housing
Elements and grant proposals for federal and state funding.
Most recent examples include the Homeless Profile, which offers an
across the county look at the homeless population, and a report on The
Distribution of Public Funds for Homeless Programs and Services
throughout San Diego County. Both are clear illustrations of what can
be accomplished through regional collaboration.
Together, local government administers more than $35 million for
homelessness in this county. Regardless of the extent of homelessness
in each of our own communities, the Task Force offers us all a regional
body of knowledge and a regional point of view on what's possible with
our limited resources; c '-'-,~-:~;,>1 ("""':"f~\NUJNICA. TIO~
cC. ~~W;0~6:~;~~~ /02#pJ
CZ)~/ g~ ~/~
655 Fourth Avenue San Diego. CA 92101 (619) 239-4800 FAX (619) 239-8010
Supported through the County and City of San Diego and the United Way of San Diego County
March 10, 1993
Page Two
In the past, public funding for the Task Force has been derived through the City and
County of San Diego. However, we all have a regional stake in the social, economic, and
political costs of this problem. Above all, we are universally concerned with the
unacceptable human conditions associated with homelessness.
For these reasons, we need your personal support and request your City join with San
Diego City and County Governments in contributing to the financial support of the Task
Force.
Please join us as a participant in the Regional Task Force.
Respectfully,
/
,
Isor John MacDonald
of San Diego
Mayor Susan G~
City of San Diego
LLW:JLS:bsh
ITEM NUMBER:
olD
RESOLUTION NUMBER:
ORDINANCE NUMBER:
,9KJib~r
OTHER:
ITEM NUMBER REFERENCED ABOVE WAS CONTINUED FROM
DATE: 5-11- 93
(AGENDA PACKET SCANNED AT ABOVE DATE)
ITEM NUMBER REFERENCED ABOVE HAS BEEN CONTINUED TO
DATE:
MISCELLANEOUS INFORMATION:
~lJtlNt'l. s#~/J'~r61J "~TG~NATII/G
N~H8;~ ,-Jv()
Se.4e /'I",'lIr~.s G-/lJ-93
&()-/
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
ITEM TITLE:
Ite :'\, ~ 0
Meeting Dat 5/11193 -!)! 1'3 ;3
Report: Analyzing two alternatives for the Otay Valley Regional Park
Focus Planning Area 0
Director of Parks and Recreatipt1..
City Manager {;It {to (4/5ths Vote: Yes_Noll
k"
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
The following information will describe the proposed Otay Valley Regional Park Focus Planning
Area (FPA). In considering the FPA, two alternative will be explored: 1) the FPA as endorsed
by the Otay Valley Regional Park Policy and Citizen Advisory Committees; and 2) a
modification to the FPA which identifies Poggi, Wolf and Salt Creek Canyons and the area
around the lakes as a special study area.
RECOMMENDATION: That- the Council support Alternative #2, thereby endorsing the
proposed Focus Planning Area and special study area for the Otay Valley Regional Park planning
process.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: At its meeting of April 15, 1993, the
Parks and Recreation Committee voted 7-0 to support Alternative #2.
DISCUSSION:
The Otay River Valley spans three jurisdictions (Cities of Chula Vista and San Diego, and the
County of San Diego) and has regional significance as a wildlife corridor and major river course.
Since 1989, the City and County of San Diego and the City of Chula Vista have been jointly
planning a regional park within the Otay River Valley area from South San Diego Bay to the
lower Otay Ltservoir. In 1990, a Joint Exercise of Powers Agreement (JEPA) between the City
and the County of San Diego and the City of Chula Vista was approved by each jurisdiction.
The JEP A enables each agency to jointly coordinate acquisition, planning and design of the
proposed park.
In order to accomplish the goal of achieving a regional park within the valley, the JEPA
established a Policy Committee (PC). The PC is comprised of the Mayor of Chula Vista, the
Eighth District Councilmember from the City of San Diego, and the First District member of the
San Diego County Board of Supervisors. The PC's main charge is to act as a decision-making
body for policy issues related to the development of a park plan. In addition, a Citizen's
Advisory C0mmittee (CAC), of approximately 30 members, was appointed by the PC to provide
input on the park planning process.
The JEP A specifies that an FP A boundary be established and adopted by each agency. Joint staff
from the three jurisdictions prepared a draft FPA boundary which was presented and modified
~ d.-O -- /
Page 2, Item ~
Meeting Date 5/11/93
at several CA and Policy Committee meetings. The FPA boundary was approved by the Policy
Committee on June I, 1990. On October 2, 1992, the PC reaffirmed its commitment to the
current planning direction and recommended that each agency adopt the FPA boundary. Since
this time the City and County of San Diego have adopted the Focus Planning Area. However,
the County has indicated to staff that if Council approves the FP A as identified in Alternative
#2, they would be willing to reintroduce the modified FPA to the Board of SU~J"Visors.
FPA Alternatives
Staff has analyzed two alternatives for the FPA. The first alternative . the Policy Committee's
recommended alternative (See Attachment A). The second alte ve comes as a result of a
concern expressed by Council and City staff about the FPA bei too large and expansive (See
Attachment B). Specific concerns had to do with the reason' g behind the inclusion of Poggi
Canyon, Wolf Canyon and Salt Creek Canyon into the FP . Other concerns dealt with why
more remote areas like the area around the lakes needed be included in the FPA.
Alternative #1: Support the FPA boundary as ap oved by the Policy Committee and the
Citizen's Advisory Committee.
The proposed FP A boundary exte"nds eastward a roximately 11 miles from south San Diego Bay
along the Otay Valley to the Otay Lakes and ureau of Land Management boundaries near the
San Ysidro Mountains. The FPA generally ncompasses lands located within the Otay Valley
and the major canyon and open space are connecting to the Valley.
The proposed FPA boundary traverses ounty of San Diego, City of Chula Vista, and City of
San Diego jurisdictional lines. The Citizens' Advisory Committee and Policy Committee
supported the FPA (Alternative #1) ause it was based on the following criteria: 1) potential
viewshed areas, 2) natural and e ironmentally sensitive resources, 3) connection to other
regional open space systems, and ) opportunities for recreational uses. Included in the FP A
boundary are some publicly own lands, however, the majority of the land in the FPA is within
the private ownership. The FP A roadly focuses on the park's sphere of influence. For example,
all significant open space inte aces, trail linkages and environmentally sensitive areas will be
analyzed relative to their rela on ships to the Valley.
e authority of the IEP A and allow Joint Park Planning staff and
committees to comment 0 uture development within these planning areas. A downside to this
alternative is the level of view could be very detailed, thereby detracting from focusing staff
efforts on the Otay Vall and the formulation of a concept plan. In addition, the areas of Salt
Creek, Wolf and Pogg' Canyons and the area around the lakes have and will continue to be
subject to extensive view through the Otay Ranch Planning process and the Resource
Management Plan. Further review of these areas by the Joint Park Staff appears to be a
duplication of efforts.
Alternative #2: Treat Poggi, Wolf and Salt Creek Canyons and the area around the lakes as a
special study area. (Staff's recommended alternative.)
__;r},; .~
".,;J P.. ~
Page 3, Item d. ~
Meeting Date 5/11/93
Recognizing the concerns expressed by Council and staff about the FPA being too large, the
Department has identified an alternative which treats these areas as a special study area. For
example, once the Sunbow Development occurs, staff would review the open space component
of Poggi Canyon as an open space maintenance district. Once the East Orange extension is
developed, all slopes, parkways and median installations would be reviewed separately from the
park's planning process. However, potential relationships to the Valley such as wildlife corridor
or trails would be taken into consideration by planning staff.
In the case of Poggi, Wolf and Salt Creek Canyons and the area around the lakes, it is envisioned
that these areas could be managed under a separate open space preserve. Although these areas
would be separate from the Regional Park they could certainly complement the park through
potential trail linkages, wildlife corridors and habitat preserves. In this special study area, Chula
Vista staff would communicate all pertinent information that may have a relationship to the
Regional park to joint park staff. This alternative would eliminate the need or a detail level of
planning within the special study area by joint regional park staff. This alternative is somewhat
consistent with what has been previously approved by the Citizen's Advisory Committee and
Policy Committee. The minor difference is the level of review would be less. The Special Study
Area concept has been discussed with Joint Park staff and they did not express any serious
concerns with this approach. All issues related to the study area would be conveyed to regional
park staff and committees as informational. In addition, coordination of planning efforts would
continue to take place between Otay Ranch staff and the Regional Park Joint Planning Staff.
Lastly, this alternative will serve as way to focus on areas only within the Otay Valley, thereby
expediting the development of the regional park's boundaries and a concept plan.
Conclusion
Since the original approval of the FPA boundary by the Policy Committee, planning effort has
included: preparation of the Otay Valley Regional Park Progress Plan; participation in the Otay
Ranch planning process; development of a detailed resource enhancement plan; and identification
of properties appropriate for acquisition through a State Coastal Conservancy Grant. These have
all been preliminary efforts.
The park planning effort is now ready to more into detailed states. Adoption of the FP A
boundary and special study area will provide both specific limits and a focus for Park concept
plan which will delineate park boundaries. The Policy Committee has directed the joint planning
staff to develop design guidelines for future proposed development projects. The FPA boundary
will define the area within which the guidelines will be applied, and will also serve as a
framework for future park development
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
,,"'PC F:\J-IOMBJ>ARKSREC\900.93
~..!
~o-...3
TInS PAGE BLANK
~l>;
'I
~ - 't
Minutes of a
Regular Meeting of the
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
Thursday 6:00 p.m.
April 15, 1993
Public Services Building
Conference Room 2&3
********..******...
1. ROLL CAlL
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Commissioners Hall, Lind, Sandoval. Fernandez, Willett,
Helton, Roland
MEMBER LATE:
Carpenter (6:12)
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Motion to approve the minutes of the Commission meeting of March 18, 1993 as distributed.
MSC WILLE1T/HELTON 6-0 (Carpentcr out)
3. PUBLIC HEARINGS OR REMARKS
NONE
4. DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Director Valenzuela reviewed highlights of the Commission Newsletter.
5. REPORTS FOR INFORMATION ONLY
a. Nonprofit
Director Valenzuela gavc an overview of the progress of the nonprofit. It is expected that
more information will be available in June or July.
b. GMOC Rcnort
Director Valenzuela called the Commission's attention to the GMOC report which was
included in their packets, and offered to address any questions that the Commissioners may
have.
He touched briefly on each of the GMOC recommendations, defining the Department's
position in each case.
c. Police Activities Leal!Ue
Deputy DirectorlRecreation Sunny Shy gave a brief history of the organization of the Police
Activities League, and addressed the Commission's questions regarding this League. She
~-.s-
,):{-5 J
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
April 15, 1993
PAGE 2
stated that participation levels have been much higher than anticipated. The program is run
by the Parks and Recreation staff with coaching assistance from the Police Department.
Commissioner Hall suggested writing a letter of appreciation to the Police staff who assisted
the Department with the League with copies of the letter to Councilmembers and attach a
copy of the Commission report to the Councilmembers' copies.
Commissioner Carpenter commended the Department for their efforts in organizing this
League. She, however, expressed a concern as to what is being planned for the "hard at-risk"
youth group of 12 to 15 year olds. This group is caught in the middle.
Commissioner Willett recommended two letters be sent, one to the Police Chief and one to
the Mayor and Council.
d. Chula Vista Community Park
Director Valenzuela reviewed the status of Chula Vista Community Park and gave an
overview of the future plans for the park.
6.
ACTION ITEMS
:
Unfinished Business
Otay Valley Regional Park Focus Planning Area
Director Valenzuela presented color maps of the Otay Valley Regional Park Focus Planning
Area. He stated that due to the fact that a number of studies have already taken place in
Poggi Canyon. Wolf Canyon and the Salt Creek area, he feels that there is no need to study
the area further. It is his feeling that enough data is already available to do planning in this
area.
Motion to support the Otay Valley Regional Park Focus Planning Area
MSUCHELTON~ARPENTER7~
New Business
a. Green Fee Increase
Deputy Director/Parks Jerry Foncerrada gave an overview of the proposed fee increased and
compared them to other golf courses in the County.
Director Valenzuela discussed the staff recommendation on this increase and gave the
Commission the reasons for this recommendation.
C)o...jp
~
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
April 15. 1993
PAGE 3
Raymond Cayla, a resident of Chula Vista and a senior citizen, spoke against the proposed
increase on the basis that seniors can play at lesser rates in other golf courses in San Diego
County without restrictions.
Commissioner Hall asked if statistical data was available on the age of players at different
hours. The Director replied that this data was not available.
Commissioner Hall proposed that seniors be unrestricted throughout the week and
restrictions apply only on Friday, Saturday and Sunday.
Torn Frost, Regional Director of Operations for American Golf from Long Beach, spoke in
favor of the proposed fee increase. He outlined the improvements that have been made to
the Course by American Golf and gave a status report on the current condition of the
Course.
Director Valenzuela outlined the financial impact of the recent excessive rains on the golf
course operators, American Golf, as well as on the City of Chula Vista, and gave the
reasoning that supports the staff recommended increase.
Commissioner Roland spdke in favor of leaving the fees and rules pertaining to seniors as
they are.
Commissioner Helton spoke in favor of the staff recommendation for a fee increase but
against the restrictions.
Scott Alvey, a resident of Chula Vista, stated that he represented the "Men's Golf Club" and
spoke in favor of the rate increase.
Commissioner Hall expressed concern that no statistical data was provided by American Golf
so that the Commission could see the age range and number of people playing the golf course
at various times of the day and days of the week. He feels that this is very pertinent
information to the issues that are being raised.
Motion to accept the recommendation of staff to endorse the green fees schedule, maintain
the status quo of seniors and have no restriction on senior discount play Monday through
Thursday and have Friday restriction for reserved tee times 8:00 am to 12 noon for those
people playing on senior discount.
MSC HALUWILLE1T 6-1 (Sandoval-Fernandez opposed - does not favor senior restriction)
b. Youth Summit
Director Valenzuela explained the Youth Summit process as outlined in the report that had
be submitted to the Commission.
~-J
~- ,
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
April 15, 1993
PAGE 4
Motion to support the Youth Summit concept and authorize Commissioners Hall and
Carpenter to attend the Youth Summit Phase I and Phase II meetings on May 12 and June
2, 1993.
MSUC WILLElT/HELTON 7-0
c. Benefits of Parks and Recreation
Item tabled due to time constraints.
d. Issues for Joint Workshop
o Views on Department as lead youth agency in the City
o Budget priority for at risk youth
o Tour of the types of park we have
o Underserved areas
o Youth development programs
o Gymnasium site in the City
Commission requested the Director to put together a list of sites/issues for the meeting and
bring it to the May Commission meeting.
7. COMMUNICATIONS
a. Written Corrcsoondencc
NONE
b. Commissioner's CommenL.
HELTON - Commissioner Helton reported on her Grandson's being accosted by a man in
Hilltop Park who told him that the park belonged to him and he did not allow dogs in the
park.
Adjournment to the next regularly scheduled meeting of May 20, 1993.
Respectfully submitted,
/-- /~ ,:
/' , ; 'i
1/, ,,~
' ./ ,""
-,-f"'7/_fi., '. /"/<",.
CarOle Cramer Stohr
,;;P ..~
~
z
o
>
z
<(
U
(!)
(!)
o
Q
~'"'~-~~
___~~,._ ",'. : ,,'~- ~ "..,1
! .,' i ~l ;."\t~ t 'F"-
.' J;.:..--" ,
'<; .: /,-,~~l~~ /
~, "\-~,~
-'l
"~- ~-
. "j.
ATTACHMENT
}-
I,
"
1~
--: ~_!~.,;, I-
:)~~;~: ;: _.-'
. _ .d~'.
'-
"
,
./ '
(
J
.\
._",-3.j
.1_,
\
i,
, .. I '-,
~1' (~~l-
, ~ I,
~ -;
,!~-I
I j~ ,- 'J .,.
h.,-r;" - " t--r
,
'",
\,\"
-,
.:1
"
,
,.,
I)
..;"\'"
"
-,
'~..'~
\,.1,
I..
""Q;"'"
,~ !
~ ,.T\____ ,~ 1 .: ~I i}
,'<' '.;:" \: \~J'(")>\; ~Jr'.,'\f
'", '\I, k'--'-'--:;"'" -",
I -.t _ _ _ ,1 .._ 't..,.~':"'.Jl:r' 1.1
\ ~ 4;""' ~ \ .~.\_ '.'--; '. \' .~._"\'""1\1 \ ;;,;r2.
, y . . \ .' .,...... _ ,1- L. -\ "1
'. ' ,.' \;',., "~ \,' .:~' ';"
_',' \ 'CI, ~ '\ I , "I' ""',~ ;"
I""":" ",,' '.\ II' It~' .::-,'
o" ) 'E,' (- "J' - II!. ,," ''1'\' '; ,;-IT ,
; ",' '" ___ ,I " ," ;,,;W ,
'j'i, , .' -',.,)ft',',."\' ''- " ""ft
y " l ~"<:(, ':i.] "y",)~ ,,1\ '
/ "c'II,,'," '.' " 'I' J."'" ~ .1:tri
~,~, ~~ i';\'\\':'\" \ l:\- J'1 \ \ \;.J.~t'l
'. \."",'," \,+,.-; "':' ~1 ,.,;_~F;; ,-
.;;'- ",' , ,"
''''8~' '".. \; '..' -,,'.~I-:'~'~a'\'Oi' "
" ' \, ,Ii ':'I? ,,~,,' I"~ f'"
II' ,,'~' ),-\ :).;1'\,1,'--'
~~"-.\ ,~,~"~'I'\"59,~~li' I' ,~:.
, ,~/\ ' i ,. ~-'" -J I
_\.1\-- ;::;::.-\" ,~~-
,;'....1 ' . . -,/ .'
, '
"
.I
-:- ;I~~;
I"
~'
~;,- ~
- '
_,f\1'
,
",~
\,-----)
, ) .
" - : J..
"
r~~, Ii
j;\ --;
I,
-'
-,
\
.\
\
,
" 'r.. \ ~ - -
....' \;
,i\' ,\
~I
,
.,
. )
"
~ =~\..:pq' '..~ ;:~ (; "
d'. \... .'
r \', -~" " - .
!- :~ ':\
,\. \' ~'\
,\0\'" ,',-\>'
~\'};.;_.
, . .' ,~
Q
\--\,'
-2D-'r
- 'y C
'J-_ - (
'A 1
~
w
w
C!:
U
I-
...J
<(
(j)
i
1>11:
1111 a:
,-, ctl
;...c..
I~~
>z
ct2
'I- "
J~
, I'
,:' 1
,,'
I
'I" '
, :-.
, Ii
"j
I
z
o
>
z
<(
U
;:I!
IIII1
. . ~ -~-;-
:~~~-~;
" 1--
: {d..
~.~i ~j~
rj ~j
LL
...J
o
5
i:
11
z
o
;:: ,..
.
"
o
0'
n'
~ :'
~:
~'
.'
c
!z E
~ ~
~ "
~ ~
.
-
ATTACHMENT '8'
,
.'
,
::.::
w
w
Q::
o
>-
...J
<t:
c.n
1',,1
hil
z
0
>
Z
<t: , ~f
z 0 ,
0 u... .} ~,~
> ...J
Z 0
<t: ~ !, .
Il1ll;
0 ~: I; .11
(!) ilii!!!!
(!) .i
0
c..
z
0
; ,
~8~
i!~
i~~
~ =
"~a
o 0
. <
w ,
! ';
i <
w ~
0
.'
"J'\'"'".r-j,..,.,_.~.,~T'Y-J'~X""'V-'- (
~~z2ti:;~~~~:,~f~,tt(>,';,
,~\,. :rJ.l~i,,:J)c'A' ;)~,~_.;,-~'~~<'U.:l.'
c~~_:c;;,,~~~i~~;:-'c-:'...
-~~)~'~"#'~..-.":-~,' -
. ;.~- ii:lcf:. ~,
" .,;'t_v'f_-~"_,,
~~'-~~\--";.d~:'i~:"~;- --
..J:::.."" .~>~;;
II;J - ':-1
'1;-
~51;':.-j;,r
Attachment A
~ \.
~'>"
.;'':'
". - ~-'. .
~.
I
,.
J
~
~'i
~T~t.
:,;;/,>
':r!!~~<:.':
'- \\'.f/,//,,-,'
,.',;.~ l-'~:f:o\"":'
~\?:~'
.\.~,~~~
~\
".
;.:.-
)
;)'#~
~~
<>-,
F
:.~\,-:-~tr
,,..-'.1
.v
i~
[J
, I
>~I'
UI~
jD.
~....
>~
Z
i>O
,~-
II- Cl
OUl
a:
','
"I;
"rrt
:!'!I!
ill
-, j
. ~.
-.
~
~j
1 i_
~' I~.t
~'.'~..]I...,~.
.' -
:~ !,
'..i'
,;"""
I
-20 ---/j
YI/(/l-c
II
c
. m
S ~
~ t
~n~
~~~
;~ii
S~~
~~~
tJ8~
~ g
", ~
~ g
z
I
1lilrii II
I!~ lJ
r
'"
~
o
r
TI
()
)>
Z
-<
o
z
-u
o
(j')
(j')
()
)>
Z
-<
o
z
I
J
~.'
j' !.:
L'
i
~'.\
"~ .
J:
(f)
)>
r
~
()
;v
m
m
^
( r-:
en
iJ
8 iUaw4JPi+lf
May 18, 1993
MEMO TO:
The Honorable City Council
Tim Nader, May~
REPORT - CREATION OF BUDGET & OPERATIONS OVERSIGHT
(LITTLE HOOVER) COMMISSION
FROM:
SUBJECT:
During the hearings earlier this spring on the adjustments, several citizens made the valid
point that the City must pay attention to budget and operation deficiencies as well as the
revenues. At least one citizen, Joe Casillas, specifically suggested the creation of a
Citizen Oversight or "Little Hoover" Commission.
While the City has in many ways done a good job in keeping overall expenses down, I
believe this suggestion has merit. A group of qualified citizens looking at a budget
outside of a staff perspective or from outside of a staff perspective could well contribute
ideas for our consideration which would hopefully help us to minimize costs (and even
taxes) while maintaining services in these tight budgetary times.
I would purpose that the commission be comprised of 7 members with our usual
provisions for appointment, eligibility, terms, etc. Ongoing staffing should be kept at a
minimal level, although it is obvious that staff will need from time to time to be prepared
to offer information to the commission on a "request" basis.
I would also suggest that we incorporate a sunset clause into an ordinance establishing
such a commission so that we can evaluate what positive results, if any we have
obtained, and decide accordingly whether the commission should be made permanent.
I believe 2 years should be adequate to ascertain whether the commission can provide
us with worthwhile results.
I appreciate your respectful consideration. Thank you.
TN:pq
budget
*Dictated by the author; signed and distributed in his absence.
,:lt4/J-1
MJEMORAJID\lTh.1I
f... <: /") Cl.
v
May 12, 1993
TO:
Legislative Committee )()~
sid W. Morris, Assistant City Manager~J ~I
.4 '\
Daniel D. Beintema, Senior Management Assistan
Legislative Analyses
VIA:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
Attached for your review are analyses of SB 36, ACA 25, an~ AB
2286. SB 36 is addressed in the 1993 Legislative under section II
(items requiring formal Council action). While ACA 25 is addressed
under section I (items not requiring formal Council action) staff
recommends that the bill be reviewed by the full council. AB 2286
is covered by the 1993 Legislative Program and does not require
formal action by the City Council.
I. ITEMS REOUIRING COUNCIL DISCUSSION/ACTION:
1. SB 36 (Kopp): Brown Act. Proposes significant changes to the
Brown Act. Analyses of the SB 36 bill text performed by Lynn
McDougal, City Attorney for the cities of EI Cajon and
Imperial Beach, and by the Senate Local Government Committee
are provided for your information.
Recommendation: OPPOSE
2.
ACA 25 (Woodruff): Hiqher Education Fundinq.
apply Prop 98 and Prop 111 funding guarantees for
secondary education.
Proposes to
public post-
Recommendation: OPPOSE
II. ADDRESSED BY THE LEGISLATIVE PROGRAM. THUS REOUIRING NO
COUNCIL ACTION
3.
AB 2286 (Prinqle): Bookinq Fees.
from payment of booking fees in
provides for the recovery of the
Proposes to exempt cities
certain circumstances, and
fees from the arrestee.
Recommendation: SUPPORT
Should you have any questions on any of these recommendations,
please feel free to contact me at 691-5031.
cc: Mayor and City Council
Advocation, Inc.
Lyman Christopher, Director of Finance
Richard Emerson, Chief of POI~,-) 4- --- J
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
LEGISLATIVE ANALYSIS
May 7, 1993
I BILL I AUTHOR I TITLE I INTRODUCED I AMENDED I
SB 36 KOPP BROWN ACT 12/7/92 I -- r
CITY POSITION LEAGUE POSITION RELATED BILLS ADDRESSED BY LEG. PROGRAM
PENDING OPPOSE SB 1140 YES; SECTION II.C.3
STATUS: PENDING SENATE APPROPRIATIONS COMMITTEE
BACKGROUND: THE BROWN ACT, ENACTED IN 1953 AND AMENDED OVER THE YEARS,
GENERALLY REQUIRES THAT THE MEETINGS OF THE LEGISLATIVE BODIES OF
LOCAL AGENCIES BE CONDUCTED OPENLY, WITH SPECIFIED EXCEPTIONS. THE
ACT MAKES CERTAIN NOTICING REQUIREMENTS CONCERNING PUBLIC MEETINGS
AND MAKES IT A MISDEMEANOR FOR A MEMBER OF A LEGISLATIVE BODY TO
ATTEND A MEETING WHERE A VIOLATION OCCURS IF IT IS KNOWN THAT THE
MEETING IS IN VIOLATION OF THE ACT.
IN THE 1992 LEGISLATIVE SESSION SENATOR KOPP CARRIED SB 1538, A BROWN
ACT BILL CONTAINING VERY RADICAL CHANGES TO THE CURRENT LAW. SB
1538 WAS AMENDED IN BOTH HOUSES NUMEROUS TIMES IN AN EFFORT TO
ELIMINATE OR WATER-DOWN SOME OF THE CHANGES AND WAS SENT TO THE
GOVERNOR WHO LATER VETOED THE BILL. FOLLOWING THE VETO, THE BILL
WAS SENT TO INTERIM STUDY WHERE A NUMBER OF COMPROMISES WERE
AGREED UPON FOR INTRODUCTION IN THE 1993 SESSION. WHEN SB 36 WAS
INTRODUCED, SENATOR KOPP HAD DELETED MUCH OF THE COMPROMISE
LANGUAGE, AND THE BILL REMAINS MUCH AS IT DID EARLY IN THE 1992
SESSION.
SB 36 WOULD: SIGNIFICANTLY EXPAND THE SCOPE OF THE BROWN ACT FOR OPEN MEETINGS
OF LOCAL GOVERNMENT LEGISLATIVE BODIES. AMONG OTHER THINGS, IT
INCLUDES A PROVISION WHICH WOULD ALLOW A COURT TO REQUIRE TAPING
OF CLOSED SESSION DELIBERATIONS, AND WOULD EXTEND THE STATUTE OF
LIMITATIONS FOR ALLEGATIONS OF BROWN ACT VIOLATIONS IN ALL
CIRCUMSTANCES OTHER THAN WHERE ACTION IS TAKEN IN OPEN SESSION.
FISCAL IMPACT: ALTHOUGH THE FISCAL IMPACT OF SB 36 IS DIFFICULT TO QUANTIFY, THE
OVERALL IMPACT ASSOCIATED WITH DAMAGES AND/OR LITIGATION DEFENSE
COSTS WOULD BE SIGNIFICANT.
DATE TO COUNCIL
5/13/93
RECOMMENDATION
OPPOSE
LETTERS
YES
C:\(ANAl YSESJ\SB36.ANA
"') 7..c.' "')
< <j {,.... ,;>Z.
~
Cf (
. . ~
c. (
~~ 0 ,: (
c.. (
. '.
(;. (
\ . "':'i
r e(
01 (
( · ( 1.
~ I (. \,
"a ( I
o ( ,t( .
.( .
O~ '(
-
-
~
SENATE BILL
No. 36
(
.
Introduced by Senator Kopp
.
December 7, 1992
An act to amend Sections 54951.7, 54952,2, 54952.3, 54953,
54953,5,54954,54954.2,54954.3,54956,9,54957,54957.1,54957.2,
54957.5,54957.7,54959,54960,54960.1, and 54961 of, to amend
and renumber Sections 54952.5, 54952.6, and 54952.7 of, and to
add Sections 54952.5, 54952.6, 54953.6, 54954.5, and 54955.2 to,
the Government Code, relating to open meetings, and
declaring the urgency thereof, to take effect immediately..
.
. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'll DIGEST
SB 36, as introduced, Kopp. Open meetings of local
government.
The Ralph M. Brown Act generally requires that the
meetings of the legislative bodies of local agencies, as those
terms are defined, be conducted openly, with specified
exceptions. Among other things, the act provides for certain
notice requirements concerning public meetings and makes
it a misdemeanor for a member of a legislative body to attend
a meeting where a violation occurs with knowledge of the fact
that the meeting violates the act.
Under existing law, local agency, for purposes of the RalPh\
M. Brown Act, includes any nonprofit corporation created by
one or more local agencies having members on its board of
directors with the purpose of making or operating any public
work pr~.
This b' would define public work project to include any
Structure or infrastructure improvement, and its associated
services and activities intended for public rather than private
benefit.
The Ralph M. Brown Act defines legislative body as any
multimember body which exercises any authority of a
legislative body of a local agency delegated to it by that
.
,
99 III
_...~--_._-
'l') I ~::<
.>~ J (."- ._/
SB 36
-2-
legislative body.
This bill would specify that such a body that exercises any
material authority of a legislative body of a local agency
delegated to it is a legislative body whether it is organized and
operated by a local agency or by a private corporation
specifically created to exercise the delegated authority with
a specified exception.
The Ralph M. Brown Act defines legislative body to include
an advisory body of a local agency.
This bill would require an advisory body to post an agenda
for its meetings in the manner required of the body it advises
thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. The bill
would exclude a limited duration ad hoc committee from the
definj~on, of legislative body but would include any standing
comnuttee, as defined. of a governing body irrespective of its .
composition.
This bill would also define "member of a legislative body of
~ a local agency" .to i~clude any person elected to serve as a
\:>0' member of a legISlative body and who has not yet assumed the
('- duties of office.
c The ~alp~ M. Brown Act generally requires all meetings of
~ the l~gISlative body of a local agency to be open and public.
~,- This bill would define "meeting," with exceptions as any
con~egation of a. ml!-jority of the members of a le~slative
body m the same time and place to hear, di$cuss, or deliberate
upon any item within the subject matter jurisdiction of the
legislativ~ ~y or its local agency, and any use of direct
co~umcation. personal intermediaries, or technological
deVIces ~mployed by a majority of the members to develop
, ' It collective concurrence as to action to be taken on an item.
, : .Existing law requires all meetings of the legislative body of
,a loc~ agency shall be open and public with specified
, exceptions.
! . 'This .bill would prohibit a legislative body from taking
action by secret ballot. - -, -
The Ralph M. Brown Act permits recording of open and
public meetings by any person.
This bill would make any recordihg made at the direction
of a local agency a public record under the California Public
Records Act, as specified.
..
.
-3-
SB 36
The bill would also provide that no legislative body shall
prohibit or otherwise restrict the broadcast of its proceedings
in the absence of a reasonable finding that the broadcast
cannot be accomplished without disruption. .
Under the Ralph M. Brown Act, meetings of the legislative
.... body of a local. agency need not be held within the boundaries
'9 of the territory over which the agency exercises jurisdiction.
If an emergency makes the designated meeting place unsafe
the presiding officer may designate a meeting place for the
duration of the emergency.
This bill would require meetings to be held within the
boundaries of the territory of the agency, with limited
exceptions and with additional exceptions for the governing
board of a school district, and' would permit the presiding
officer's designee to designate an emergency meeting place.
The Ralph M. Brown Act requires the posting of an agenda
at least 72 hours before a regular meeting of a legislative body
briefly describing each item of business and restricts action or
.tA discussion of the meeting to these items on the agenda, unless,
~ by at least a % vote, as specified, the legislative body decides
I there is a need for action on a nonagenda item.
I This bill would revise the content of that description and
! would permit members of a legislative body to respond to
. ;- MIlt. certain questions not relating to agenda items. This bill would
~ make further restrictions on the discussion or action on
nonagenda items.
The Ralph M. Brown Act requires the agenda for a regular
meeting to provide an opportunity for members of the-public
to address the legislative body.
This bill would require the agenda for a special meeting at
which action is proposed to be taken on an item to provide an
opportunity for members of the, public
Ie 'slative bod rior to action on the item The bill would
t er reqwre e egislative y not to a ridge or prohibit
constitutionally protected speech, including, but 'not limited
to, publi riti ism of the a enc as s med.
This bill would also prescribe . c osures 0 e nature 0
, closed sessions according to a. specified format.
.. Existing law specifies the circumstances requiring a notice
I of the adjournment or continuance of a meeting to be made
SB 36
-4-
and posted.
This bill would further require that the notice of
adjournment or continuance be given to the news media, as
specified, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program.
The Ralph M. Brown Act authorizes closed sessions of a
legislative body to confer with, or receive advice from, its
legal counsel regarding pending litigation when discussion in
open session would prejudice the position of the local agency
in the litigation and describes the facts and circumstances that
constitute pending litigation. Existing law states that this
authority is the exclusive expression of the lawyer-client
privilege for purposes of conducting closed sessions pursuant
to the ,\ct. The act requires the legal counsel to prepare a
memorandum concerning the reasons and legal authority for
the closed session.
. This bill would state that this authority for closed sessions
for the legislative body to confer with or receive advice from
.~ its legal counsel does not limit or otherwise affect the .
\'CJ lawyer-client privilege as it may apply to written or other
';:, communications outside meetings between. the legislative
. \ body and its legal counsel. The bill would specify additional
VI facts and circumstlmces for determining what is pending
litigation. The bill would delete the memorandum
requirement. . .
Under the Ralph M. Brown Act, closed sessions may be held
.for various reasons, including matters relating to employees,
as defined.
This bill would revise the definition of employee to exclude
any elected official, member of a legislative body, or person
providing services to the local agency as an independent
contractor or the employee of an independent contractor and
would require that, as a condition of holding a closed session
on complaints against an employee, charges to consider
disciplinary action, or to consider dismissal, the employee be
given written notice of his or her right to a public hearing.
)be failure to give the notic~ would nullify any action taken
in the closed session against the employee. .
The Ralph M. Brown Act requires the legislative body to
publicly report closed session actions taken and roll call votes
to appoint, employ, or dismiss a public employee.
{I
(I
.
.
I
I
I
I
i
.
I
I
.
-5-
SB 36
This bill would instead require the legislative body to
publicly report any action taken in closed session and the vote
or abstention of every member present on real estate
negotiations, litigation and pending litigation issues with
specified exceptions, claims for various liability losses, various
personnel actions, and certain collective bargaining matters.
The bill would prohibit any action for injury to reputation or
other personal interest by an employee with respect to whom
a disclosure is made by a legislative body in compliance with
these provisions. The bill would prescribe how the reports are
to be made and would require a brief statement of the
information to be posted, as specified, thereby imposing a
state-mandated local program.
The Ralph M. Brown Act permits legislative bodies of local
agencies to designate a clerk, officer, or employee to attend
each closed session and enter in a minute book a record of the
topics discussed and decisions made at the meeting;
This bill would require the legisJative bodies to appoint a
person for that purpose.
Under the Ralph M. Brown Act, agendas and writings
distributed to members of the legislative body by persons
connected with the body for discussion or consideration at a
public meeting of the body are public records unless
specifically exempt from public disclosure.
This bill would specify that writings intended for
distribution to members by any person in connection with a
matter subject to discussion or consideration at a public
meeting are public records, and would specify that writings
intended for distribution prior to commencement of a public
meeting are public' records, whether or not actually
distributed to, or received by,the legislative body at the time
of request for copying. The bill would require that writings
that are made public records under this provision and are
distributed during a public meeting shall be made available
for public inspection immediately, or after the meeting, as
specified. .
The Ralph M. Brown Act requires the legislative body to
state the general reason or reasons for holding any closed
session prior to or after holding the closed session.
This bill would require the reasons to be stated prior to
SB 36
-6-
~
\.>0
~
holding the closed session and would specify the fonnat for
the' statements.
The Ralph M. Brown Act makes it a ffiisdemeanor for a
member of a legislative body to attend or participate in a
meeting of the legislative body where action is taken in
violation of the act with knowledge of the fact that the
meeting is in violation of the act.
This bill would instead make it a misdemeanor if the
member attends or participates with intent to deprive the
public of information to which it is entitled under the act.
This bill, by enlarging, the number of persons and bodies
subject to the Ralph M. Brown Act and by revising the
definition of a meeting elsewhere in the bill, would enlarge
the scope of existing crimes and would create new crimes and
would thereby impose a state-mandated local program.
The Ralph M. Brown Act permits any interested person to
commence an action by mandamus or injunction to obtain a
judicial determination that an action taken by a legislative
body in violation of specified provisions of the act is null and
void, unless any ofspecified conditions exist. However, a prior
demand must first be made of the legislative body to cure or
correct the alleged violation within 30 days from the date the
action was taken.
This bill would expressly permit the district attorney or any
interested person to commence an action as described and
would also permit an action to determine the validity of any
rule or action by the legislative body to limit the expression
of its members or to compel the legislative body to tape
record its closed sessions, as specified. The bill would also
require the written demand to be made within 90 days if the
alleged violation occurred in a closed meeting.
The bill would prohibit the conduct of meetings or
functions in facilities inaccessible to disabled persons or that .
require members of the public to make a payment or
purchase.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse
local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated
by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for
making that reimbursement, including the creation of a State
Mandates Claims Fund to pay the cost of mandates that do not
\
(":"
\.: '
I
,
(I
I
(I
-7-
SB Jo
.
exceed $1,000,000 statewide and other procedures for claims
whose statewide costs exceed $1,000,000. '
This bill would provide that for certain costs no
reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
However, the bill would provide that if the Commission on
State Mandates determines that this bill contains costs
mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be
made pursuant to those statutory procedures and, if the
statewide cost does not exceed $1,000,000, shall be made from
the State Mandates Claims Fund.
This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately
as an urgency statute.
Vote: %. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes.
State-mandated local program: yes.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
1 SEcrION ' 1. ' Section 54951.7 of the Government
2 Code is amended to read:
3 54951.7. "Local agency" includes any nonprofit
4 corporation, created by one or more local agencies, any
5 one of the members of whose board of directors is
6 appointed by !Melt the local agencies and which is fonned
7 to acquire, construct, reconstruct, maintain or operate
8 any public work project. For the purposes of this section,
9 "public work project" includes any structure or
SB 36
-8-
1-
j~
\I\j
\\
,",'
1 include the lessee of any hospital the whole or any part
2' of which is leased pursuant to subdivision (p) of Section
3 32121 or Section 32126 of the Health and Safety Code as
4 of the effective date of this act.
5 SEe. 3. Section 54952.3 of the Government Code is
6 . amended to read:
7 54952.3. As used in this chapter, "legislative body"
8 also includes any advisory commission, advisory
9 committee or advisory body of a local agency, created by
10 oharter, ordinance, resolution, or by any similar formal
11 action of a legislative body or member of a legislative
12 body of a local agency.
13 ,Meetings of . lftIt!h those advisory cOIDnUSSlOns,
14 committees or bodies concerning subjects which do not
15 require an examination of facts and data outside the
16 territory of the local agency shall be held within the
17 territory of the local agency and shall be open and public,
18 and notice thereof must be delivered personally or by
19 mail at least 24 hours before the time of lftIt!h the meeting
20 to each person who has requested, in writing, notice of
21 lftIt!h the meeting.
22 If the advisory commission, committee or body elects
23 to provide for the holding of regular meetings, it shall
24 provide by bylaws, or by whatever other rule is utili2ed
25 by that advisory body for the conduct of its business, for
26 the time and place for holding lftIt!h regular meetings. No
27 Mftep notice of regular meetings, other than the posting
28 of an agenda pursuant to Section 54954.2 in the place used
29 by the legislative body that it advises, is required.
30' "Legislative body" as defined in this section does not
31 include a limited duration ad hoc committee composed
32 solely of members of the governing body of a local agency
33 which are less than a quorum of lftIt!h the governing
34 body, but does include any standing committee of a
35 governing body irrespective of its composition. For
36 purposes of this section, "standing committee" means a
37 permanent body created by charter, ordinance,
38 resolution, or by any similar formal action of a legislative
39 body or member of a legislative body of a local agency
40 and which holds regularly scheduled meetings.
~
.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
. :t
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
. :
35
36
37
38
39
40
<I
.
I
I
.
I
-9-
SB 36
The provisions of Sections 54954, 54955, and 54955.1;
ftftd 511966 shall not apply to meetings under this section.
SEC. 4. Section 54952.5 of the Government Code is
amended and renumbered to read:
Sgi!.S.
54952.4. As used in this chapter "legislative body" also
~cludes, but is not limited to, planning commissions,
library boards, recreation commissions, and other
p'ermanent boards or commissions of a local agency.
SEe. 5. Section 54952.5 is added to the Government
Code, to read:
54952.5. As used in this chapter, "member of a
legislative body of a local agency" includes, but is not
limited to, any person elected to serve as a member of a
legislative body who has not yet assumed the duties of
office. That person shall conform his or her conduct to the
requirements of this chapter and shall be treated for
purposes of enforcement of this chapter as ifhe or she has
already assumed office, and shall be individually liable for
violation of this chapter prior to assuming office.
SEC. 6. Section 54952.6 of the Government Code is
amended and renumbered to read: .
SWSi!.6.
54952.7. As used in this chapter, "action taken" means
a collective decision made by..a mlijority of the members
of a legislative body, a collective commitment or promise
by a majority of the members of a legislative body to
make a positive or a negative decision, or an actual vote
by a ml\iority of the members of a legislative body when
sitting as a body or entity, upon a motion, proposal,
resolution, order or ordinance. .'
SEC. 7. Section 54952.6 is added to the Government
Code, to read:
. 54952.6. (a) As used in this chapter, "meeting"
mcludes all of the following:
(1) Any congregation of a majority of the members of
a .legislative body in the same time and place to hear,
discuss, or deliberate upon any item that is within the
subject matter jurisdiction of the legislative body or the
local agency to which it pertains.
SB 36
-10-
,~
\.>-.j
'"
t'.i
1. (2) Any use of direct communication, personal
2 intermediaries, or technological devices that is employed
3 by a majority of the members of the legislative body to
4 develop a collective concurrence as to action to be taken
5 on an item by the members of the legislative body.
6 (b) Nothing in subdivision (a) shall impose the
7 requirements of this chapter upon any of the following:
8 (1) Individual contacts or conversations between a
9 member of a legislative body and any other person.
10 (2) The attendance of a majority of the members of a
11 legislative body at general conferences that are open to
12 the public, that involve a discussion of broad issues, and
13 that are attended by a broad spectrum of officials from a
14 variety of government agencies, provided that a majority
15 of the members do not discuss among themselves
16 business of a specific nature that is within the subject
17 matter jurisdiction of the legislative body of the local
18 agency. Nothing in this paragraph is intended to allow
19 members of the public free admission to a general
20 conference at which conference organizers have
21 required other participants or registrants to pay fees or
22 charges as a condition of attendance.
23 (3) The attendance of a ~ority of the members pf a
24 legislative body .at an open and publicized meeting
25 organized to address a topic of local community concern
26 by a person or organization other than the local agency,
27 provided that a rruijority of the members do not discuss
28 among themselves business of a specific nature that is
29 within the subject matter jurisdiction of the legislative
30 body of the local agency.
31 (4) The attendance of a ~ority of the members at a
32 purely social or ceremonial occasion, provided that a
33 nuijority of the members do not discuss among
34 themselves business of a specific nature that is within the
35 subject matter jurisdiction of the legislative body of the
36 local agency.
37 SEC. 8. Section 54952.7 of the Government Code is
38 amended and renumbered to read:
39 5195&.'1.
40 54952.8. A legislative body of a local agency may
~
,
.
I
I
i
,
-11-
S836
1 require that a copy of this chapter be given to each
2 member of the legislative body and any person elected
3 to serve as a member of the legislative body who has not
4 BSSlfIDed the duties of office. An elected legislative body
5 of a local agency may require that a copy of this chapter
6 be given to each member of each legislative body all or
7 a majority of whose members are appointed by or under
8 the authority of the el~cted legislative body.
9 SEC. 9. Section 54953 of the Government Code, as
10 amended by Section 1 of Chapter 399 of the Statutes of
11 1988, is amended to read:
12 54953. (a) All meetings of the legislative body of a
13 local agency shall be open and public, and all persons
14 shall be permitted to attend any meeting of the
15 legislative body of a local agency, except as otherwise
16 provided in this chapter.
17 (b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the
18 legislative body of a local agency may use video
19 teleconferencing for the benefit of the public or the
. 20 legislative body of a local agency in connection with any
21 meeting or proceeding authorized by law. The use of
I', 22 video teleconferencing, as authorized by this chapter,
23 shall be limited to the receipt of public comment or
24 testimony by the legislative body and to deliberations of
. 25 the legilllative body. H the legislative body of a local
26 agency elects to use video teleconferencing, it shall post
27 agendas at all video teleconference locations and adopt
28 reasonable relNlations to adequately protect the
29 statutory or constitutional rights of the parties or the
30 public appearing before the legislative body of a local
31 agency. The term "video teleconference" shall mean a
32 system which provides for both audio and visual
33 participation between all members of the legislative body
34 and the public attending a meeting or hearing at any
35 video teleconference location.
36 (c) No legislative body shall take action by secret
37 ballot, whether preliminary or final.
38 This section shall remain in effect until January I, 1994,
39 and on that date is repealed, unless a later enacted
40 statute, which is chaptered before January I, 1994, deletes
I
,
I
,
.
I
I
~
SB 36
-12-
\'
,Aj
"-\;
"-
(I
1 or extends that date.
2, SEC. 9.5. Section 54953 of the Government Code, as
3 amended by Section 2 of Chapter 399 of the Statutes of
4 1988, is amended to read: .
5 54953. All meetings of the legislative body of a local
6 agency shall be open and public, and all persons shall be
7 permitted to attend any meeting of the legislative body
8 of a local agency, except as otherwise provided in this
9 chapter.
10 No legislative body shall take action by secret ballot,
11 whether preliminary or final.
12 This section shall become operative January 1, 1994.
13 SEe. 10. Section 54953.5 of the Government Code is
14 arllended to read:
15 54953.5. Any person attending an open and public
16 meeting of a legislative body of a local agency shall have
17 the right to record the proceedings 8ft It with an audio
18 or video tape recorder qr a still or motion picture camera
19 in the absence of a reasonable finding eE by the legislative
20 body of the local agency that fR:teh the recording cannot
21 cOntinue without noise, mumination, or obstruction of
22 view that constitutes, or would constitute, a persistent
23 disruption of the proceedings. Any tape or film record of
24 these proceedings made for whatever purpose by or,at
25 the direction of the local agency shall be a prtblic record
26 subject to inspection pursuant to the California Public
~ Records Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section
28 6250) of Division 7 of Title 1), and shJJ1l not be erased or
29 destroyed for 30 days after the taping or recording. Any
30 inspection of a video or tape recording shall be provided
31 without charge on a tape recorder made available by the
32 local agency.
33 SEC. 10.5. Section 54953.6 is added to the
34 Government Code, to read:
35 54953.6. No legislative body shall prohibit or
36 otherwise restrict the broadcast of its proceedings in the
37 absence of a reasonable finding that the broadcast cannot
38 be accomplished without noise, illumination, or
39 obstruction of view that would constitute a persistent
40 disruption of the proceedings.
~,
,
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
I 18
19
. ~
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
-13-
SB 36
SEe. 11. Section 54954 of the Government Code is
amended to read:
54954. (a) The legislative body of a local agency
shall provide, by ordinance, resolution, by-laws, or by
whatever other rule is required for the conduct of
business by that body, the time and place for holding
regular meetings. Unles~ elft8l"Vlille pra-.lisss fer itt the
~ tiBBey .jy4\ieh Hte Ieettl Bg8Bey Wft8 fSIll1.es, mssBftgfJ
M the legillllta-,e ~ tteeft ftM Be heM -niMHn the
Betlft8ttfte~ M the tsPPitapY _ 'J. M!Jft the Ieettl ageRey
exereiass jartatHSB8ft. IE M ~ time ~ rsgulM meseg
fttIIs 8ft It haliaay, llIteh regl!lttr Jft8etHtg 8!tttIl Be heM 8ft
the ttefi Bl!~iBess fttt,., y; e,. reMaR M Me; f.leed;
eltl'tRfttlM[e 6f' eYieP elll.ergeftey, ft sheH he ttflfMIfe M meet;
1ft the pIttee sesigftlltes, the 1Il.8eaa~ ffttt)' Be ftekl fer the
Sl:Waasft M the elll.srgsasy ttl; llIteh plttee ItS ill secligftllt8s
~ Mle presiding effieef eE the legialawl's ~
(b) Meetings of the legislative body shall be held
within the boundaries of the territory over which the
local agency exercises jurisdiction except to do any of the
following: '
(1) Otherwise comply with the state or Eederallaw.
(2) Inspect real or personal property which cannot be
conveniently brought within the boundaries of the
territory over which the local agency' exercises
jurisdiction. , .
(3) Participate in meetings, or discussions of
multiagency significance that are outside the boundaries
of a local agency's jurisdiction. However, any meeting or
discussion held pursuant to this subdivision shall take
place within the jurisdiction of one of the participating
local agencies and be: open and noticed by all
participating agencies as provided for in this chapter.
(4) Meet in the closest meeting Facility if the local
agency has no meeting facility within the boundaries of
the territory over which the local agency exercises
!urisdiction, or at the principal office of the local agency
if that office is located outside the territory over which
the agency exercises jurisdiction.
(5) Meet outside their immediate jurisdiction with
S:Q 36
-14-
, .
1 elected or appointed officials of the United States or the
2 State of California when a local meeting would be
3 ~practical,. solely to discuss a legislative or regulatory
4 ISSue a1fecting the local agency and over which the
5 Federal or state officials have jurisdiction if the local
6 officials present a report of the substance ~d outcome of
7 the meeting at their next regular or special meeting
8 within their jurisdiction.
9 (6) Meet outside their immediate jurisdiction iF the
10 meeting takes place in or nearby a Facility owned by the
11 agency, provided that the topic of the meeting is limited
,12 to items directly related to the Facility.
13 (7) Visit the office of the local agency's legal counsel
14 ,For a closed session on pending litigation held pursuant to
15 Section 54956.9, when to do so would reduce legal Fees or
16 costs, provided that the meeting is noticed as a special
17 meeting pursuant to Section 54956.
18 (c) Meetings of the governing board of a school
19 ~trict shall be held within the district except under the
20 CIrcumstances enumerated in subdivision (b) or to do
21 either of the Following: '
22 (1) Attend a conference on nonadversarialcollective
23 bargaining techniques sponsored by the California
24 Foun~ation For. Improvement of Employer-EmpJpyee
25 Relations, provided that the meeting is noticed as a
26 special meeting pursuant to Section 54956 and open to
27 the public and that the trustees present a report of the
28 substance and outcome of the meeting at their next
29 regular meeting within their district.
30 (2) Interview members of the public residing in
31 another district with reference to the trustees' potential
32 employment of the superintendent of that district,
33 provided that th~ meeting is noticed as a special meeting
34 pursuant to Section 54956 and open to the public and that
35 the trustees present a report of the substance and
36 outcome of the meeting at their next regular meeting
37 within their district.
38. (d) IF at any time any regular meeting Falls on a
39 holiday, that regular meeting shall be held on the next
40 business clay.
~
w
~
---
()
.
-15-
SB 36
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16.
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
(e) If, by reason of lire, flood, earthquake, or other
emergency, it shall be unsafe to meet in the place
designated, the meetings shall be held For the duration of
the emergency at the place designated by the presiding
officer of the legislative body or his or her designee in a
notice to the local media that have requested notice
pursuant to Section 54956, by the most rapid means of
communication available at the time.
SEe. 12. Section 54954.2 of the Government Code is
amended to read:
54954.2. (a) At least 72 hours before a regular
me~ting, the legislative body of the local agency, or its
deSignee, shall post an agenda containing a lwief gefterIH
description of each item of business to be transacted or
~scussed at th~ meeting, ~ lt8eftlia 8ft&a 9IIeeWy the
ftIfte -e leeaaeB ef the regttlM' meeftng -e llhtiII he
pested ift ft leeaB8ft thM is &eely aeee88ihle M m8I1lBS:fS
ef the 111:1I:3Iie. ~ aeReB llhtiII he tftkeB eft e,. Hem ftM
appe~Jlg 8ft ~ 1'88tetl ageRM.
-f9T sufficient to inform an interested member of the
public about the subject matter under consideration so
that he or she can deteTnline whether to monitor or
participate in the meeting of the body. The description
may reFer to explanatory documents, such as
correspondence or the reports. of a committee staif
offici~, or department available For public inspecti~n and
copymg at a stated location during the normal office
hours of the local agency. IF there is a reference to II
report or other item that is available to the public, the
contents of that report may be used to deternline
whether the agenda description meets the requirements
of this section. The agenda shall specify the time and
location of the regular meeting and shall be posted in a
location that is Freely accessible to members of the public.
. (b) No action or discussion shall be undertaken on any
Item not appearing on the posted agenda, except that
members of a legislative body may briefly respond to
state~~nts mflde or questions posed by persons
exerclsmg thelT public testimony rights under Section
54954.3. In addition, on their own initiative, or in response
SB 36
-16-
1\'
"
\."0
~
1 to questions posed by the public, members of a legislative
2 body may ask a question for clariJication, provide a
3 reference to staff or other resources for factual
4 information, or request staff to report back to the body at
5 a subsequent meeting concerning any matter.
6 Furthermore, a member of a legislative body, or the body
7 itself, may take action to direc;t staff to place a matter of
8 business on a future agenda.
9 (c) Notwithstanding subdivision -tet (b), the
10 legislative body may take action on items of business not
11 appearing on the posted agenda under any of the
12 following conditions:
13, (1) Upon a determination by a majority vote of the
14 legislative body that an emergency situation exists, as
15 defined in Section 54956.5.
16 (2) Upon a determination by a two-thirds vote of the. I
17 legislative body, or, if less than two-thirds of the members I
18 are present, a unanimous vote of those members present, \
19 that there is a need to take immediate action and that the
20 need te telte for action _ came to the attention of the
21 local agency subsequent to the agenda being posted as
22 specified in subdivision (a).
23 (3) The item was posted pursuant to subdivision (a)
24 for a prior meeting of the legislative body occurring not
25 more than five calendar days prior to the date action is
26 taken on the item, and at the prior meeting the item was
27 continued to the meeting at which action is being taken.
28 SEC. 13. Section 54954.3 of the Government Code is
29 amended to read: .
30 54954.3. (a) Every agenda for regular meetings shall
31 provide an opportunity for members of the public to
32 directly address the legislative body on any item of
33 . interest to the public, before or during the legislative
34 body's consideration of the item, that is within the subject
35 matter jurisdiction of the legislative body, provided that
36 no action shall be taken on any item not appearing on the
37 agenda unless the action is otherwise authorized by
38 subdivision (b) of Section 54954.2. Every agenda for a
39 special meeting at which action is proposed to be taken
40 on an item shall provide an opportunity for members of
........
--
,
I'
t
-17-
SB 36
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
the pu~lic to di~ectly a~dress the legislative body
concermng that Item pnor to action on the item.
~owever, 1ft the etl!le M It meeftftg ef It eHf eeliBeil Ht It
~ M' It B8&1'8 M 8t1~eI'1lili81'8 1ft It eH,o &ft6 eetlJl~, the
agenda need not provide an opportunity for members of
the public to address the eeliBeil M' Be&M legislative
body on any item that has already been considered by a
committee, composed exclUSively of members of the
e8liBe~ et' B8.&I'8 legislative body, at a public meeting
wherem all mterested members of the public were
afforded the opportunity to address the committee on the
item, before or during the committee's consideration of
i:?e item, unless !he item has been substantially changed
smce the comrmttee heard the item, as determined by
the e8t1fteil M' BeM8 legislative body.
(b) The legislative body of a local agency may adopt
reasonable regulations to ensure that the intent of
subdivision (a) is carried out, including, but not limited
to, regulations limiting the total amount of time allocated
for public testimony on particular issues and for each
individual speaker.
(c) The legislative body of a local agency shall not
~bridgt; or prohibit .co~stitutionally protected speech
mcluding, but not limited to, public criticism of the
policies, procedures, programs, or services of the agency,
or of any other aspect of its proposals or activities, or of
the acts or omissions of the legislative body, on the basis
f!1at f!1e performance of one or more public employees is
Implicated, or on any basis other than reasonable time
cons~afI!ts adopted in regulations pursuant to
SubdiVISIon (b). Nothing in this subdivision shall confer
any privilege or protection for expression beyond that
otherwise provided by law.
SEe. 14. Section 54954.5 is added to the Government
Code, to read:
54~54.5. (a) In addition to the desCription of items to
be discussed or acted upon in open and public session, the
age~da ,Posted pursuant to Section 54954, any mailed
no~ce gIv~n pursuant to Section 54954.1, and any call and
notice delivered to the local media and posted pursuant
A.\
~
\A'
'"
(-.,
~
i (~
,
I
I
I
,
!
!
SB 36
-18-
1 to Section 54956 and any determination of necessity made
2 under paragraph (2) of subdivision (c) of Section 529?4.2
3 shall specify and disclose the nature of any closed sessIOns
4 in the following form:
5 . (1) With respect to a closed session held purs~ant to
6 Section 54956.7, the item shall be deSignated
7 "License/Permit Determination" and shall specify the
8 number of license or permit applicants involved.
9 (2) With respect to every item of business to be
10 discussed in closed session pursuant to Section 54956.8,
11 the item shall be designated under the heading
12 "Conference with Real Property Negotiator" and shall
13 lpecify, by street address, or, if there is not a street
14 address, by parcel number, or other unique reference,
13 the real property under negotiation, the party or parties
16 who are directly or through an agent negotiating with the
17 agent of the legislative body. It shall also specify that the
18 conference will concern the price and terms of payment.
19 (3) With respect to every item of business to be
20 discussed in closed session pursuant to Section 54956.9,
21 the item shall be designated under the heading
22 "Conference with Legal Counsel" and the subheading of
23 either "Existing Litigation" or "Anticipated Litigation."
24 Entries under "Existing Litigation" shall identifY, by
23 reference to the claim and the claimant's name or the
26 case number and name of the adverse party, any claim or
~ case under discussion pursuant to subdivision (a) of
28 Section 54956.9. If the identification would jeopardize the
29 agency's ability to effectuate service of process upon one
30 or more unserved parties, the phrase "unspecified to
31 protect service of process" shall be used instead of the
32 identification. If the identification would jeopardize the
33 local agency's ability to conclude existing settlement
34 negotiations to its advantage, the phrase "unspecified to
35 protect settlement advantage" shall be used instead of
36 the identification.
37 Entries under "Anticipated Litigation" shall refer to
38 closed sessions called pursuant to subdivision (b) or (c)
39 of Section 54956.9, and shall indicate, after the phrase "As
40 defendant," the number of distinct cases or potential
.
-19-
SB 36
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
~
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
cases to be discussed as instances of anticipated litigation
against the agency, and after the phrase, "As plaintiff,"
the number of distinct claims or cases to be discussed as
instances of anticipated litigation to be filed by the
agency.
(4) With respect to every item of business to be
discussed in closed session pursuant to Section 54956.95,
the item shall be designated under the heading "Liability
Claims" and shall specify, with respect to each claim to
be discussed, the claimant's nanle and the claim number
if any, and the name of the local agency that the claim h~
been filed against. .
(5) With respect to every item of business' to be
discussed in closed session pursuant to Section 54937, the
item shall be designated "Threat to Public Services or
Facilities" and shall specify the name, title, and agency of
any law enforcement officers to be conferred with; or
shall be designated "Public Enlployee Appointment" and
shall specify the title or description of any position to be
filled by the appointment; or shall be designated "Public
Enlployee Hiring" and shall specify the title or
description of any position to be filled by hiring; or shall
be designated, "Public Employee Performance
Evaluation" and shall specify the name and position of
any employee who is under consideration for a change in
compensation or benefits; or shall be designated,
"Discipline/Dismissal of' One or More Public
Enlployees." .
(6) With respect to every item of business to be
discussed in closed session pursuant to Section 54937.6,
the item shall either be designated under the heading
"Conference With Agency Labor Negotiator" and shall
specify the name of any organization of employees with
whom the negotiations to be discussed are being
conducted, or the names and titles of individual
employees, unrepresented by an organization, with
whom the negotiations to be discussed are being
conducted.
(7) With respect to closed sessions called pursuant to
Section '37606 or 37624.3 of the Government Code or
S836
,-20-
"
'0
l\j
~:,
1 Section 32106 or 32155 of the Health and Safety Code, the
2 item either shall be headed "Report Involving Trade
3 Secret," shall specify whether the discussion will concern
4 a proposed new service, a proposed new program, or a
5 proposed new facility, or shall be headed "Hearing(s)"
6 and shall specify whether the testimony or deliberation
7 ",ill concern staff privileges, the report of a medical audit
8 committee, or the report of a quality assurance
9 committee, For the purposes of this chapter, any hospital
10 subject to this chapter may hold closed session meetings
11 pursuant to Section 37606 or 37624,3 of the Government
12 Code or Section 32106 or 32155 of the Health and Safety
13 Code, whether or not a hospital is otherwise subject to the
14 Local Hospital District Law (Division 23 (commencing
15 with Section 320(0) of the Health and Safety Code).
16 (b) In case of multiple items of business under the
17 same category, lines may be added and the location of
18 information may be' reformatted to eliminate
19 unnecessary duplication, and space, as long as the
20 relationship of information concerning the same item is
21 reasonably clear to the reader. Nothing in this section
22 precludes, as an alternative to the inclusion of lengthy
23 lists of names or other information in the agenda, or as a
24 means of adding items to an earlier completed ag~da,
25 the incorporation by reference to separately prepared
26 documents containing the required information, as long'
27 as copies of those documents are posted adjacent to the
28 agenda within the time periods required by Sections
29 54954.2 and 54956 and proyided with any mailed or
30 delivered notices required by Section 54954.1 or 54956.
31 SEe. 15. Section 54955.2 is added to the Government
32 Code, to read: .
33 54955.2. In the case of any adjournment pursuant to
34 Section 54955 or any continuance pursuant to Section
35 54955.1 for which posting of the notice or order is
36 required, the notice or order shall also, no later than one
37 hour prior to resumption of the adjourned or continued
38 meeting, be communicated by telephone or facsimile
39 transmission to each local newspaper and radio or
40 television station that haS requested notice' of special
---..
'-\J
,
i:
. ,
. I
,
-21-
SB 36
1 meetings pursuant to Section 54956 and that has provided
2 telephone or facsimile transmission numbers for this
3 purpose.
4 SEC. 16, Section 54956,9 of the Government Code is
5 amended to read:
6 54956.9. Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to
7 prevent a legislative body of a local agency, based on
8 advice of its legal counsel, from holding a closed session
9 to confer with, or receive advice from, its legal counsel
10 regarding pending litigation when discussion in open
11 session concerning those matters would prejudice th~
12 position of the local agency in the litigation.
13 For purposes of this chapter, all expressions of the
14 lawyer-client privilege other than those provided in this
15 section are hereby abrogated. This section is the exclusive
16 expression of the lawyer-client privilege for purposes of
17 conducting closed-session meetings pursuant to this
18 chapter. For purposes of this section, litigation shall be
19 considered pending when any of. , the following
20 circumstances exist:
21 (a) An adjudicatory proceeding before a court,
22 administrative body exercising its adjudicatory authority,
23 hearing officer, or arbitrator, to which the local agency is
24 a party, has been initiated formally.
25 (b) (1) A point has been .reached where, in the
26 opinion of the legislative body of the local agency on the
27 advice of its legal counsel, based on existing facts and
28 circumstances, there is a significant exposure to litigation
29 against the local agency.
30 (2) Based on existing facts and circumstances, the
31 legislative body of the local agency is meeting only to
32 decide whether a closed session is authorized pursuant to
33 paragraph (1) of this subdivision.
34 For purposes of paragraphs (1) and (2), "existing facts
35 and circumstances" shall consist only of one of the
36 following:
37 (A) Facts and circumstances that might result in
38 litigation against the agency but are not yet known to a
39 potential plaintiH or plaintil1s, which facts and
40 circumstances need not be specified.
e
'1.<,
~
r
I
"-
~
I,
,
~; I
, :~'
~il
,
!'I!
I,:
I,
SB 36
-22-
1 . (l!) Facts and circumstances, including, but not ,
2 limited to, an accident, disaster, incident, or transactional
3 occurrence that might result in litigation against the
4 age~cJ: and 0at are known to a potential plaintiff or
5 plam.tiHs, w.hich facts or circumstances shall be specified
6 publicly pnor to the closed session.
7 (C) The receipt of a claim pursuant to the Tort Claims
8 Act or MJme other, written communication from a
9 potential plaintiff threatening litigation, which claim or
10 commumcation shall be available for public inspection
11 pursuant to Section 54957.5.
12 (D) A statement made in an open and public meeting
13 threatening litigation made by a person on a specific
I., ma(tEte')r within the responsibility of the legislative body.
15 . A statement made outside an open and public
16 meetjng threatenjng litigation made by a person on a
17 specific matter WIthin the responsibility of the legislative
18 body so long Ifi the oflicial or employee' of the legislative
19 body receiving the threat makes a contemporaneous
20 r~rd of the communication, which record shall be
21 available for public inspection pursuant to Section
22 54957.5.
23 (F) Nothing in this section shall require disclosure of
24 written communications that are privileged and not
25 subject to disclosure pursuant to the California Public
26 Records Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section
27 6250) of Division 7 of Title 1).
28 (c) Based on existing facts and circwnstances the
29 legislative body of the local agency has decided to initiate
30 or is deciding whether to initiate litigation.
31 Prior to holding a closed session pursuant to this
32 secti?n, the legislative body of the local agency shall state
33 ~ublicly to which subdivision it is pursuant. If the session
34 IS cl~sed pursuant to subdivision (a), the body shall state
35 the title of or otherwise specifically identify the litigation
36 to be discussed, Unless the body states that to do so would
37 jeopardize the agency's ability to effectuate service of
38 process upon one or more unserved parties, or that to do
39 so would jeopardize its ability to conclude existing
40 settlement negotiations to its advantage.
-23-
SB 36
1 ~ le8el ee_51 ef the lesidll'fi-/e heey ef the leeeI
2 ageney shttIl I'rel'M'e flftft Ift:dlfnit te the ~ tt
'3 ftlSlft81'8l\dttm st&ttng the spasms F6868fIB MMI legal
4 81:IYl.ePi~ fer the elesed se88ien. If the eiased se88i.eR is
5 p1tf9l:lftftt te SlHJtliviBi6B ~ the mSHl8f&!ltbtlB shell
6 iReltlde the ftHe ef the litigMieR. If the eiesed se88i.eR is
7 JMH'!ft:llH'lt te Stll;IlWMeR ~ eP -tet. the 1B8mel'lIftd_
8 shttIl iRelttde the elfisHBg Eaee flftft ewe_lmlees 8ft
9 -.-,mell ft is hll8ed. =ate le8el .ee_el M8Il Stt8mi.t the
10 mem8l'lHllftuR te the heey priM te the eilllled seMeR if
11 (elllli9le, flftft ift tift)' _ tM IttteP dwt _ weeIt efteP the
12 elesed s588ieR. :J:fte meme1'8lld_ sheIIlse elle~t &em
13 diode_e l'8!'8tl1t1lt te SeetieR 6S6U.
14 For purposes of this section, "litigation" includes any
15 adjudicatory proceeding, including eminent domain,
16 before a court, administrative body exercising its
17 adjudicatory authority, hearing officer, or arbitrator.
18 SEC. 17. Section 54957 of the Government Code is
19 amended to read:
20 54957. Nothing contained in this chapter shall be
21 construed to prevent the legislative body of a local
22 agency from holding closed sessions with the Attorney
23 General, district attorney, sheriff, or chief of police, or
24 their respective deputies, on matters posing a threat to
25 the security of public buildings or a threat to the public's
26 right of access to public services or public facilities, or
27 from holding closed sessions during a regular or special
28 meeting to consider the appointment, employment,
29 evaluation of performance, or dismissal of a' public
30 employee or to hear complaints or charges brought
31 against stteh the employee by another person or
32 employee unless stteh the employee requests a public
33 hearing. As a condition to holding 8 closed session on the
34 complaints or charges to consider clisciplimuy action or to
35 consider dj,""j~, the employee shall be given written
36 notice of his or her right to have a public hearing rather
37 than 8 closed session, which notice shall be delivered to
38 the employee personally or by mail at lesst 24 hours
39 before the time for holding the session. If notice is not
40 given, any disciplinary or other action taken against the
SB 36
-24-
>~
'-\;
('.,
i'-"'
1 employee in the closed session shall be null and void. The
2 legislative body also may exclude from e,. IRleft that
3 public or closed meeting, during the examination of a
4 witness, any or all other witnesses in the matter being
5 investigated by the legislative body. "
6 ~ the ptH'p8S8S M.ms SeeReft, the tel.'Ift "empleyee"
7 8IteB Bet ineltls8 e,. peP88ft elee~es te eAiee, et'
8 app8iB~es te 8ft eAiee e,. the le8i8IeR':e Bee,. M It Ieeel
9 egeRey, praviseEl, h.8A~e/eJ\ that ft8Ilslse8...e peaift8flB e(
10 eit)' ---'gel, eetlll~ atIIftinislftt8r, eft)- attel'ftey, eetlft~'
11 eetll'lllel, et' It sell~ Leftt heM et' ether llUBiI.ar
12 admiBi8l!PeWte eAieer eE It Ieeel ~ftey 8fteII he
13 ee_sered 8IBpleyee pelliReIlll, tlftd pre'Ases, ftuother
'14 the!: lI.eneleew/e pesiR8Il1l Mgeneral I"--ager, eMef
IS 8ft~-8eF, Ie88I e8tlfJlJe1, fiiemEt 8e~r8hlr), MlEliter,
16 _S.M, tFe_er, et' _ eeHeeter eE e,. gelel'BlBefttel
17 flt8tfttJt 8tlf'pl)oing semees ',,;d!in limited hetlll.Jn"'ieB 8fteII
18 he se8lll.\es 8IBpleyee JlIl8iReIlll.
19 Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to prevent
20 any board, commission, committee, or other body
21 organized and operated by any private organization as
22 "defined in Section 54952 from holding closed sessions to
23 consider (a) mattere affecting the national security or
24 (b) the appointment, employment, evaluation' of
25 performance, or dismissal of an employee or to hear
26 complaints or charges brought against IRleft an employee
27 by another person or employee unless IRleft the
28 employee requests a public hearing. Stteft The body also
29 may exclude from e,. 8tIeh that public or closed
30 meeting, during the examination of a witness, any or all
31 other witnesses in the matter being investigated by the
32 legislative body. .
33 For the purposes of this section, the tenn "employee"
34 shall not include any elected offlcial, member of a
35 l~gislative' body, or person engaged as an independent
36 contractor who, during the engagement, provides
37 services to multiple clients or customers other than the
38 local agency. Nothing in this section shall limit local
39 offlcials' ability to hold closed session meetings puisuant
40 to Sections 32106 and 32155 of the Health and Safety
1/\1
,
:1
ill
, ,
1(1
~: I
i
-":25-
SB 36
1 Code.
2 SEC. 18. Section 54957.1 of the Government Code is
3 amended to read:
4 54957.1. (a) The legislative body of any local agency
5 shall publicly report . the ptthlie lBeeMg lIIumg 'Nmek
6 the elsses se8lli8ll ill heW et' M He ft6fft ptlhlie lftee8Bg tlft)'
7 8eR8Il ~alf8l1., tlftd tlft)' MIl eeD '18M there8ft, te aplleint,
8 ampley, et' dismi8s It Jltlhlie empleyee arising eM eE tlft)'
9 eleses lIEl8lliell. M the le~-l-ti<.'e hetI,o any action taken in
10 closed session and the vote or abstention of evezy
11 member present thereon, as follows:
12 (1) Approval given to the body's negotiator
13 concerning real estate negotiations pursuant to Section
14 54956.8 shall be reported sRer the agreement is final,
15 upon any inquiry and at its next public meeting. If its own
16 approval renders the agreement final, the body shall
17 report that approval, the substance of the agreement, and
18 the vote thereon in open session at the public meeting
19 during which the closed session is held or, iFthere are no
20 members of the public present when the closed session
21 ends, at its next meeting. If final approval rests with the
22 other party to the negotiations, the local agency shall
23 disclose the fact of that approval, the substance of the
24' agreement, and the body's vote or votes thereon upon
25 inquiry by any person, as soon as the other party or its
26 agent has infonned the local agency of its approval.
~ (2) Approval given to the body's legal counsel to
28 prosecute, defend, or seek or refrain from seeking
29 appellate review or relief, or to otherwise enter as a
30 party, intervenor, or amicus curiae in any fonn of
31 litigation as the result of a consultation under Section
32 54956.9 shall be reported in open session at the public .
33 meeting during which the closed session is held or, if
34 there are no members of the public present when the
35 closed session ends, at its next meeting. In the case of
36 approval given to prosecute an action, if an immediate
37 announcement thereof would jeopardize the agency's
38 ability to eHectuate the service of process on one or more
39 unserved parties, the announcement need not identifY
40 the action, the defendants, or other particulars, but shall
i
I
i
I
i
I:
,
>~
SB 36 -26-
te an action has been
1 specify that the directi?n to pros:k~dants, and the other
. 2 given and that ~e action~&s~losed by this paragraph
3 particulars reqlJ!I'~ to been effectuated, be disclosed to
4 shall, once serYlce as d shall be announced at the
5 any perso~ upon .req{:i~ booy. The report shall identify
6 next public meeting o. cOparties with the local
7 the adverse pari! ~r ~~::. a::: order to be defended
8 age1!cy, any eXlS~!tual circumstances or contrac~al
9 a~amst, o~ .any rise . to the local agency's complamt,
10 dispute gJVJng .. . initiative
11 petition, or other ~tigationth body'~ legal counsel of a
12(3) Approval gJv€!n t~. eti n as defined in Section
13, settlement of pending liflKa t~ ~r during a judicial or
14 54956.9, at any stage !,no~all be reported alter the
15 quasi-judicial proceeding . quiry and at its next public
16 settlement is final, upon an,i] :nders the settlement final,
17 meeting. If its own ap~ov a1 the substance of the
18 the body shall report at :p:~ in open session at the
19 agr~ment, ~d th~ vO::hic:~e closed session is held, or
20 public meeting dunng f the ublic present when the
21 if there are no membez:s 0 P ting If final approval
22 closed session ends, at Its nextt::e litigation, the local
23 rests with some. other ~fact of that approval, the
24 agency shall disclose t d the body's vote or votes
25 substance of t11.e ~eemen , an rson, as soon as the oth€!r
26 thereon ~pon mqwry f:1F:'Y:ithe legislative body of Its
27 party or Its agent has rm
28 approval: . . hed as to claims discussed in closed
29 (4) D1SpOSltion reac. 5495695 shall be reported as
30 session pursuant ~o Sec:er tha't discloses the name of
31 soon as reached m a m of the local agency. claimed
32 the claimant, the nam; th claim and any monetary
33 against, the su~~anfcce Oym:nt ana' agreed upon by the
34 amount approvf'U or pa
35 claimant. . t loy dismiss, transfer,
36 15) Action taken to appom , emPth '....n'co affect the
\' th . tion of. or 0 e. "~_J
37 accept e reSlgna f' ublic employee in closf'U
38 employment contr~; a J957 shall be reported at the
39 session purs~ant to . :: h the closed session is held or,
40 public meeting dunng w c
Vv
;:-.
)
i
........
C'l\
-27-
SB 36
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
if there are no members of the public present when the
closed session ends, at its next meeting. Any report
required by this paragraph shall name the employee and
position affected and shall specify compensation, job
classification or title, and assignment to any specific
location. The general requirement of this paragraph
notwithstanding, the report of a dismissal or of the
nonrenewal of an employment contract shall be deferred
until the first public meeting following the exhaustion of
administrative remedies, if any.
(6) Approval given to the body's representative of an
item proposed for or accepted under bargaining in closed
session pursuant to Section 54957.6 shall be report~d a.t
the public meeting during which the closed seSSIon IS
held or, if there are no members of the public present
when the closed session ends, at its next meeting. The
report shall identify the item approved and the oth.er
party or parties to negotiation if the agreement WIth
respect to that item is final with the body's approval and
has been accepted or ratified by the other party.
(b) Reports that are required to be made pursuant to
this section may be made orally or in writing. The
legislative body' shall provide to any person who has
submitted a written request to the legislative ,body within
24 hours of the posting of the agenda, or to any person
who has made a standing request for all documentation
as part of a request for notice of meetings pursuant to
Section 54954.1 or 54956, if the requester is present at the
time the closed session ends, copies of any contracts,
settlement agreements, or other affected documents that
were finally approved' or adopted in the closed session
and that embody the information required to be
disclosed by immediate report. If the action taken results
in one or more SJJbstantive amendments to the related
documents requiring retyping, the documents need 1!0t
be released until the retyping is completed dunng
normal business hours, provided that the presiding
olTicer of the legislative body or his or her designee orally
summarizes the substance of the amendments for the
benefit of the document requester or any other person
{",
'-\)
"
,A\
I
--....,
'0
I
: J
SB 36
-28-
)
1 present and requesting the inFonnation.
2 (c) The documentation referred to in paragraph (b)
3 shall be available to any person on the next business day
4 following the meeting in which the action referred to is
5 taken or, in the case of substantial amendments, when
6 any necessary rf!typing is complete.
7 (d) Nothing in this section shall be construed to
8 require that the legislative body approve actions not
9 otherwise subject to legislative body approval.
10 (e) No action for injury to a reputational or other
11 personal interest may be commenced in any court or
12 agency by or on behalf of any employee with respect to
13, whom a disclosure is made by a legislative body in
14 compliance with this section. ,
15 SEe. 19. Section 54957.2 of the Government Code is
16 amended to read:
17 54957.2. (a) The legislative body of a local agency
18 ~ e,. er8inenee 81' I'eseksfteft, seiligttltte shall appoint
19 a clerk or other officer or employee of the local agency
20 who shall then attend each closed session of the
21 legislative body and keep and enter in a minute book a
22 record of topics discussed and decisions made at the
23 meeting. The minute book made pursuant to this section
24 is not a public record subject to inspection pursuant 'to the
25 California Public Records Act (Chapter 3.5
26 (commencing with Section 6250) of Division 7 of Title 1),
27 and shall be kept confidential. The minute book shall be
28 available only to members of the legislative body or, if a
29 violation of this chapter is alleged to have occurred at a
30 closed session, to a court of general jurisdiction wherein
31 the local agency lies. &teft The minute book may, but
32 need not, consist of a recording of the closed session.
33 (b) An elected legislative body of a local agency may
34 require that each legislative body all or a majority of
35 whose membets are appointed by or under the authority
36 of the elected legislative body keep a minute book as
37 prescribed under subdivision (a).
38 SEe. 20. Section 54957.5 of the Government Code is
39 amended to read:
40 54957.5. (a) Notwithstanding Section 6255 or any
-29-
SB 36
1 other provisions of law, agendas of public meetings and
2 any other writings, when distributed to all, or a majority
3 of all, of the members of a legislative body of a local
4 agency by It memher, effteer, elftJlle)'ee, 8P ttgefH ef 8tteft
5 Bee,. fep any person in connection with a matter subject
6 to discussion or consideration at a public meeting of 8tteft
7 the body, are public records under the California Public
8 Records Act (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section
9 6250) of Division 7 of Title 1) ftlI886ft ftlI 8ioh'iI:nlttls, and
10, shall be made available pursuant to Sections 6253 and
11 6256. However, this section shall not include any writing
12 distributed in connection with a matter subject to
13 discussion or consideration in a closed session if the
14 writing is exempt from public disclosure under Section
15 6253.5,6254, or 6254.7.
16 (b) Writings which are public records under
17 subdivision (a) and which are 8i8ftoihtltes intended for
18 distribution prior to commencement of a public meeting
19 shall be made available for public inspection and copying
20 'upon request prior to commencement of lftIeft the
21 meeting whether or not actually distributed to or
22 received by the legislative body at the time of the
23 request. '
24 (c) Writings which, are public records' under
25 subdivision (a) and which are distributed during a public
26 meeting -e pt'ieP te'eeHlftlefteem8ftt ef their EIise_ieft
27 M stteft meeftng shall be made available for public
28 inspection pt'ieP te e8lft1ftefteem.eftt eE; -e stlriftg tftetp
29 8i.~etl!J8ieft M lftIeft meet:iftg immediately if prep~ed by
30 the local agency or a member of its legislative body, or
31 after the meeting if prepared by some other person.
32 (d) WPitmg3 -NM€h He pltBJie Fsearss tlIUleJF
33 s~esi'.oi.sieft W -e ..vftidl ttPe 8i.sftoihtltes 6t1riftg tftetp
34 Eh~eH8918ft M it plthlie fft6S8ng sIt8:IIlte tft8fIe a-'aHshle Mr
35 fltlelie iftspeetieft imHte8i.ately 81' 1I8 _ tIIereMter 1I8 is
36 flFlletiellele.
37 W Nothing in this section shall be construed to
fl preve~t the legislative body of a local agency from
9 chargmg a fee or deposit for a copy of a public record
40 pursuant to Section 6257. :Ate 'IJPit:ift~ aesePieea itt
.~
~;
t.
-z
I
i~
j
'I'
'j.
; I
,: I
1.1
,
I .
i I
,,\ ,
" I
'L;
" ~
.1 '
SB 36
-30-
1 MdYMMl6 -tBh ieh -e ~ _ 8tl8jeet M t:he
2 J'eiJtftremeMs ef t:he CelHel'ftia PttBlie ReeMds Aft
3 (ChepteF 3:5 (e8ftUBeReing wHft EasseR 8il&9), Di.. Hft8R
4 '+; ~ ~ -e II\thdY. ifli8ftlj -tBh ieh -e ~
5 (e) This section shall not be construed to exempt from
6 public inspection any record covered by tftM eet: the
7 requirements of the California Public Records Act
8 (Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 6250) of
9 Division 7 of Title 1), or to limit or delay the public's right
10 to inspect any record required to be disclosed by that act.
11 ~see8eB 8hell!IM he e8l'll1lftleEl te he applieaBle te tIftY
12 .VPHiftgs seleI,o Bee_e t!hef _ pJ'epeJ'ly tHanss'3El ift ft
13 ,eleseEl sessieB ef ft le~w..e eee,. ef t:he leeeI ageBey.
14 Nothing in this chapter shall be construed to require a
15 legislative body ep of a local agency to place any paid
16 advertisement or any other paid notice in any
17 publication.
18 1ft uVhiting" fEw p1fIlJ8S8e ef this seeBeR MeaRa
19 uvvriftng" 81 8eEiBetlllluler EstSeR ~
20 SEC.21. Section 54957.7 of the Government Code is
21 amended to read:
22 54957.7. (a) Prior to eP Mfep holding any closed
23 session, the legislative body of the local agency shall
24 state, in'an open meeting, the general reason or reasons
25 for the closed session, and may cite the statutory
26 authority, including the specific section and subdivision,
27 or other legal authority under which the session is being
28 held. In the closed session, the legislative body may
29 consider only those matters covered in its statement. In
30 the case of speeial, aElj8tmleEl, -e e8B8BtteElmee8Bg8,
31 t:he stlttemeftl shell he ma8e 88 ptIft ef Yte BeREle
32 pf8"litlea (ep the, fllJ8Bial, adjettPft6a, eP f!SBtinUSft
33 mee8Bg. N8t:htftg ift tftilI seeR8B shell relltMe eP
34 eHteme the giviBg e( ll8Hl68 eP MheP im8Pf1lftB8ft v/meh
35 "I.-sald eens8tute 8ft iwl"BflisR M pPi-;aey 8P etherr" iBe
36 ttDfteee9llll'l'Hy dY.'IJ!.ge Yte parti.ettlttr faet8 e8BElel'Oiftg tfte
37 elesel:! seBeB regular and special meetings, the
38 statement shsll be made in the form of the agenda
39 disclosures and specifications required by Section 54954.5:
40 In the case of adjourned and continued meetings, the
-31-
SB.36
1 statement shsll be made with the same disclosures and
2 specifications required by Section 54954.5 as part of the
3 notice provided for the meeting. Nothing in this section
4 shsll require or authorize a disclosure of information
5 prohibited by state or federal law.
6 (b) After any closed session, the legislative body shslJ
7 reconvene into open session prior to adjourmnent and
8 shsll make any disclosures required by Section 54957.1 of
9 action taken in the closed session.
10 (c) Convening of an open sessi.on solely for the
11 purpose of making the announcements required in this
12 secti.on shslJ not .constitute a special meeting where the
13 open session at which regular business is tr8llS8cted
14 .occurs at the time and place otherwise provided by the
15 legislative body's ordinance, resolution, by-laws, or other
16 rules adopted pursuant to Section 54954.
17 (d) The ann.ouncements required to be made in open
18 session pursuant to this secti.on may be made at the
19 locati.on announced in the agenda for the closed session
20 as long as the public' is slJowed to be present at that
21 locati.on for the purpose of hearing the announcements.
22. SEe. 22. Section 54959 of the Government Code is
23 amended to read:
24 54959. Each member of a legislative body who attends
25 a meeting of !Rteft that legislative body where action is
26 taken in violation .of any provision of this chapter, withE27 kfle.vleElge ef t:he ~ that; the meeang is ift -.;elMisB
28 theJ'esf intent to deprive the public of information to
29 w~ch it is entitled under this chapter, is guilty of a
30 nusdemeanor. . .
31 SEe. 23. Section 54960 of the. Government Code is
32 amended to read:
33 54960. Att,> The district attorney or any interested
34 p~rson. may commence an action by mandamus,
3S mJun~tion or declaratory relief for the purpose of
36 st.opp~g or preventing. violations or threatened
37 Vlolationsof this chapter by members of the legislative
: body. of a local agency or to determine the applicability
40 ~ this chapter to actions or threatened future action of
e legislative body, or to determine the validity under
"
\;
\........,-'
(',
;.-'
--J..
,
---t,
\ I
Ii,
! i I
.:
: ,
i
. ,
,
SB 36
- 32--
1 the laws of this state or of the United States of any rule
2 or action by the legislative body to penalize or otherwise
3 discourage the expression of one or more of its members,
4 or to compel the legislative body to tape r~ord its closed
5 sessions as hereinafter provided.
6 (b) The court in its discretion may order the
7 legislative body to tape record its closed sessions and
8 preserve the tape recordings for the period and under
9 the terms of security and confidentiality the court deems
10 appropriate to the circumstances established in the
11 record. .
12 (c) The court may enter the order upon a
13, detennination of an actual violation of this chapter or
14 upon a detennination that, under the totality of the
15 circumstances, tape recording is necessary to restore
16 public confidence in the legislative body's compliance
17 with' this chapter., to provide for more effective
18 enforcement thereoF, or to deter violations thereoF.
19 SEC. 24. Section 54960.1 of the Government Code is
20 amended to read:
21 54960.1. (a) Awt The district attorney or any
22 interested person may commence an action by
23 mandamus or injunction for the purpose of obtaining a
24 judicial determination that an action taken' by a
25 legislative body of a local agency in violation of Section
26 54953, 54954.2, 54954.5, 54954.6, or 54956 is null and void
~ under this section. Nothing in this chapter shall be
28 construed to prevent a legislative body from curing or
29 correcting an action challenged pursuant to this section.
. 30 (b) Prior to any action being commenced pursuant to
31 subdivision (a), the district attorney or interested person
32 shall make a demand of the legislative body to cure or
33 correct the action alleged to have been taken in violation
34 of Section 54953, 54954.2, 54954.5, 54954.6, or 54956. The
35 demand shall be in writing and clearly describe the
36 challenged action of the legislative body and nature of
37 the alleged violation.
38 The written demand shall be made within a9 90 days
39 from the date the action was taken unless the action was
40 taken in an open session but in violation of Section
I
-33-
SB 36
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
54954.2, in which case the written demand shall be mad';
within 30 days from the date the action was taken. Within
30 days of receipt of the demand, the legislative body
shall cure or correct the challenged action and inform the
demanding party in writing of its actions to cure or
correct or inform the demanding party in writing of its
decision not to cure or correct the challenged action. If
the . legislati~e ~y takes no action within the 3O-day
penod, the maction shall be deemed a decision not to
cur~ or correct the challenged action, and the 15-day
penod to commence the action described in subdivision
(a) shall commence to run the day after the 3O-day period
to ~ure or correct expires. Within 15 days of receipt of the
wntten notice of the legislative body's decision to cure or
con:ect~ or not to cure or correct, or within 15 days oFthe
expiration of the 3O-day period to cure or correct, et' Bet;
teeMeet' e81'l"eet, '.'lil:htn 15 ee,.s Met' ",;tfttB ;5ee,.sftoeHt
the ~ the ehelleBgS8 BeB8R _ hlItElft, whichever is
earlier, the demanding party shall be required to
commence the action pursuant to subdivision (a) or
thereafter be barred from commencing the action.
(c) An action taken that is alleged to have been taken
in violation of Sections 54953, 54954.2, 54954.5, 54954.6,
and 54956 shall not be determined to be null and void if
any of the follOwing conditions exist:
(1) The action taken was in substantial compliance
with Sections 54953, 54954.2, 54954.5, 54954.6, and 54956.
(2) The action taken was in connection with the sale
or issuance of notes, bonds, or other evidences of.
indebtedness or any contract, instrument, or agreement
thereto.
(3) The action taken gave rise to a contractual
obligation, including a contract let by competitive bid
other than compensation For services in the form of salary
?r fees For professional services, upon which a party has,
ill ~o?d f81th and without notice of a challenge to the
validity of the action, detrimentally relied.
(4) The action taken was in connection with the
collection of any tax. .
(d) During any action seeking a judicial
(
/"
~
l',
,.
)~
1C'\
'I:
!:
i
SB ;J6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7.
8
9
10
11
12
1'3
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
-34-
determination pursuant to subdivision (a) if the court
determines, pursuant to a showing by the legislative body
that an action alleged to have been taken in violation of
Section 54953, 54954.2, 54954.5, 54954.6, or 54956 has been
cured or corrected by a subsequent action of the
legislative body, the action filed pursuant to subdivision
(a) shall be PiSrnissed with prejudice.
(e) Tbe fact that a legislative body takes a subsequent
action to cure or correct an action taken pursuant to this
section shall not be construed or admissible as evidence
of a violation of this chapter. . .
SEC. 25. Section 54961 of the Government Code is
amended to read: . .
54961. No legislative body of a local agency shall
conduct any meeting; eenfel'eftee, eP eI:heP flmElft8ft in
any facility that prohibits the admittance of any person,
or persons, on the basis of race, religious creed, color,
national origin, ancestry, or sex, or which is inaccessible
to disabled persons, or where members of the public may
not be present without making a payment or purchase.
This section shall apply to every local agency as defined
in Section 54951, 54951.1, or 54951.7.
SEC. 26. No reimbursement is required by this act
pursuant to Section 6 of Article XlII B of the California
Constitution because the only costs which may be
incurred by a local agency or school district will be
incurred because this act creates a new crime or
infraction, changes the definition of a crime or infraction,
changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, or
eliminates a crime or infraction.
However, notwithstanding Section 17160 of the
Government Code, if the Commission on State Mandates
determines that this act contains costs mandated by the I
state, reimbursement to local agencies and school I
districts for those costs shall be made pursuant to Part 7 I
(commencing with Section 17500) of Division 4 of Title'
2 of the Government Code. H the statewide costs of the I
claim for reimbursement does not exceed one milliOnJ
dollars ($1,000,000), reimbursement shall be made frOID
the State Mandates Claims Fund. I
-35- SB 36
1 Notwithstanding Section 17580 of the Government
2 Cod~, unless otherwise specified in this act, the provisions
3 of this act shall become operative on the same date that
4 the act takes effect pursuant to the Califi .
5 Constituti orma
on.
6 S~C. 27. . This act is an urgency statute necessary for
7 the unmedia~e ?reservation of the public peace, health,
8 or ~ety. Within the meaning of Article IV of the
9 Cons~tu~on and shall go into immediate effect. Tbe facts
10 constituting the necessity are:
11 .In order to ~rovide the people of the State of California
12 WI~ better ~ormation regarding meetings of local
13 le~~tive ~es, to enhance public participation in local
14 deClSlonmaking,.lII)d to strengthen the open meeting law
15 for focal agenCIes at the earliest possible time it is
16 necessary that this act take effect immediately. '
o
I.TEM 11\
Senate Bill 36
(Kopp)
Lynn R. McDougal, City Attorney,
El cajon and Imperial Beach
San Diego county City Attorneys' Association
Spring Seminar February 18-20, 1993
Palm springs
Last year Senator Kopp proposed radical changes to the
familiar Brown Act. OVer time some of those changes were
eliminated or watered-down. However, th€ bulk of those changes
were maintained throughout the legislative session. When the
Assembly and Senate were able to reach agreement on the language
of the bill, it passed both houses and was presented to the
Governor for signature. At the final hour, the Governor refused
to sign it. (Perhaps the Governor reflected that the cities had
suffered enough at the hands of the state legislature for one
budget year...)
Now, to paraphrase Polterqeist, "It's baaackl"
Introduced on December 7, 1992, Senator Kopp has brought
back the same legislation which was vetoed by the Governor. This
time, the bill is being presented as an urgency statute.
Fortunately, this office was forced to repeatedly review the
proposed bill to determine how it would affect the City's
procedures. This review blossomed into a presentation for the
San Diego County City Clerk's Association. For the benefit of
the City Clerks, my office prepared a BrcJn Act update (including
the entire Act to show the changes in co~text) and underlined the
changes which would occur if the bill were to pass. A copy of
the Brown Act update is attached.
Several portions of the bill would create confusion.
Everyone who has had the pleasure of reading the letter from
william B. Conners, City Attorney of Monterey to Senator Kopp
(dated July 7, 1992) will agree that:
"By making local agency compliance more complex and
confusing, the public'S understanding will suffer. Local
agencies will clamor to try and use the mandatory 'buzz
words' and phrases which will not enhance the public's
understanding of municipal affairs. What is now commonly
understood by both the media and the public will become time
consuming to prepare, costly to manage, and more difficult
to understand. For instance, to be in compliance,
resolution of labor negotiations with our general employee
bargaining unit, representing both members and non-members,
would be entitled: 'Conference with Negotiator-
Salary/Benefits; Conference with Negotiator-Mandatory
Bargaining.' This bureaucratic title does nothing to inform
the public of what is happening, nor does it truly
accomplish anything in terms of ensuring that public
t< ' ;; t> ..? j
~J -, "-~_
disclosure occurs. You would be far better served by
amending 154957.7 to require specific clear reference, prior
to the meeting, to what action is being taken in the closed
session. Plain, direct, simple."
other portions of the bill which require certain specified
information to be reported "when the closed session ends" or at
the "next meeting," I refer to as the "lazy reporter's bill."
section 54957.1 A reporter need do nothing but sit and wait for
the "report".
Creating the report involves a number of new procedures.
The bill would reauire the legislative body to appoint someone to
attend each closed session and keep and enter a record in a
minute book of topics discussed and decisions made. 154957.2(a)
Of course we all know that the book is not a public record...
Rather than continuing to expound upon Senate Bill 36, I
invite you to review the new and "improved" Brown Act and I leave
you with the following quote from the William Conners, Monterey
city Attorney:
"This legislation reminds me of a helicopter visit
to my field position in the mountains of Vietnam by my
battalion commander. He gruffly asked for an
explanation of why it had taken me a full day to move a
mere inch on his map. After mentally rejecting several
less polite responses, I informed him that the inch on
his map was 1000 meters of the most dense bamboo I had
ever seen, and that we had lost 10% of my pll.toon to
heat exhaustion trying to cover that impenetrable
terrain. He left in his helicopter, hopefully somewhat
more understanding of what it was like on the front
lines.
"Senator, with all due respect I hear the hum of
helicopter blades in your letter. While I greatly
appreciate your taking the initiative to request
information that might reflect on this bill, I would
ask that.you delay final action at this time and visit
the front lines of California and find out what you are
going to do to your "troops" who are going to have to
implement your orders if this bill passes in its
present state. You may be shocked to hear that most
municipal attorneys applaud the intent, but shudder at
the reality of how it will impact our day-to-day
operations."
BrownAct.caa
..?'-?(' - "".J..
/ A. ..x~
THE BROWN ACT IF SB 36 (1993) PASSES:
A. HISTORY:
The Brown Act, named after its principal author, Ralph M. Brown,
was originally passed in 1953. It is California's open meeting
law. The Brown Act is found in the Government Code starting with
Section 54950. In the forty years since its enactment, the Act
has been the subject of numerous legislative revisions, judicial
interpretations and opinions by the California Attorney General.
The 1987 revisions regarding closed sessions continue the trend
toward an ever-tougher open meeting law. At the end ot ti.cal
year 1990, mandatory provisions of the Brown Act were relaxed,
but in 1991, the legislature reversed itself and unequivocally
stated its commitment to local agencies' Brown Act compliance by
enacting 154954.4.
B. PURPOSE:
The purpose of the Act can be briefly stated. It is to ensure
that the deliberations as well as the actions of local agencies
are performed at meetings open to the public, and as to which the
public has been given adequate notice. It is to prevent
government from being conducted in secret. 154950.
C. SCOPE:
The term "local agency" is defined in the statute to include
general law cities. EI Cajon is a general law city. 154951 Case
law makes it clear that it also applies to the Redevelopme~t
Agency. Torres v. Board of Commissioners (1979) 89 C.A.3cl 545.
The term "legislative body" is defined to include:
(1) The governing body of a local agency. includinq~
Derson elected to serve as a member of a leqislative
bodY who has not vet assumed the duties of office..
1154952 and 54952.5:
(2) Any advisory commission or committee created by
ordinance, resolution or by any other similar
formal action of a legislative body or member of
a legislative body. 154952.3 Specifically
mentioned are planning commissions, library
boards, recreation commissions and other
permanent boards, commissions, and committees,
unless those committees consist exclusive Iv of
two or fewer councilmembers. 154952.2
D. LOCATION:
The Brown Act requires the City Council and advisory committees
to hold meetings within the boundaries of its territory. 1154954
and 54952.3
BrownActReport
1
;;? -
;' (/\
/) ::~
~~
Meetinas may be held outside the territorY under the followina
circumstances:
(1) To otherwise comolv with state or federal law.
(2) To insoect real or oersonal orooertv which cannot
convenientlY be brouaht within the territorY.
(3) To oarticioate in ooen and noticed multiaaencv meetinas
or discussions. within the 1urisdiction of one of the
oarticioatina local aaencies.
(4) To meet in the closest meetina facility if the local
aaencv has no meetina facility within the territorY.
(51 To meet with officials of the federal or state
aovernment outside the immediate 1urisdiction to
facilitate leaislative or reaulatorv issues affectina
the local aaencv. Local aaencv must reoort the
substance of the outcome of such meetinas at the next
reaular or soecial meetina.
(6) To meetina outside the territorY in a facility owned bv
the local aaencv if the meetina concerns the facility.
(71 To visit the office of the local aaencv's leaal counsel
for a soecial meetina closed session. when doina so
would reduce leaal fees or costs.
E. MEETING:
A "meetina" includes all of the followina:
(1) Anv conareaation of a ma10ritv of the members of a
leaislative bodY in the same time and olace to hear.
discuss. or deliberate uoon any item within the sUb1ect
matter ;urisdiction of the bodY to which it oertains.
(2) Anv use of direct communication. oersonal
intermediaries. or technoloaical devices that is
emoloved bv a ma;oritv of the members of the
leaislative bodY to develoo a collective concurrence as
to action to be taken on an item bv the leaislative
bodY. 154952.6
Of course no problem exists as to regularly scheduled, duly
noticed regular and special meetings of a legislative body. The
problem arises as to informal meetings of a majority of the
members of a legislative body. Such a meeting may have varying
purposes and characteristics.
The followina actions are not oroscribed bv the Act:
(1) Individual contacts or conversations between a member
of a leaislative bodY and any other oerson.
orovided that a ma10ritv of the members do not discuss amona
themselves business of a soecific nature that is within the
sub;ect matter 1urisdiction of the leaislative bodY of the local
aaencv:
BrownActReport
2
'-I '7
,~ )(:-~4
(2) Attendance of a maioritv of the members of a
leaislative body at aeneral conferences that are open
to the public. involvina discussion of broad issues.
which are attended bv a broad spectrum of officials
from a variety of aovernment aaencies.
(3) Attendance of a maioritv of the members of a
leaislative bodY at an open and publicized meetina
oraanized to address a topic of local community concern
bv a person or oraanization other than the local
aaencv.
(4) The attendance of a maioritv of the members at a purely
social or ceremonial occasion.
1. Gatherinas of Less Than a Quorum:
Permeating the whole coverage or applicability of the Act is what
may be termed the "less than a quorum exception" to the Act. In
general terms, the concept is that the Act does not apply to
meetings of a "limited duration ad hoc committee" of less than a
quorum of the legislative body of the local agency. Gov. Code
154952.3 This is because the findings of such a committee have
not been deliberated upon by a quorum of the legislative body and
the necessity as well as opportunity for full public deliberation
by the legislative body still remains. Therefore, the public's
rights under the Act are still protected. enderson v. Board 0
Education (1978) 78 C.A.3d 875.881. "standin committee" of f
a aovernina bodY is considered a "leaislative bodv" reaardless 0
its composition. 154952.3 See also, Freedom Newspapers. Inc. v.
Oranae County Emplovees Retirement Svstem (1992) 9 Cal.App.4th
134 (petition for review granted). A board which meets any other
statutory requirement to comply with the Brown Act is not exempt
even though it meets the "less than a quorum" exception found in
Gov. Code 154952.3
In Henderson, supra, the court found that an ad hoc advisory
committee of a board of education composed solely of its members,
but constituting less than a quorum of the board, could properly
meet in private to review the qualifications of candidates for
appointments to a vacant position on the board. In Joiner v.
city of Sebastopol (1981) 125 C.A.3d 799, the court found a
violation of the Act where the city council established a
committee composed of two members of the city council and two
members of the city's planning commission to interview applicants
for a vacancy on the planning commission. This committee was
then to make a joint recommendation regarding the appointment.
The court held that a committee composed of members concededly
less than a quorum of the city council as well as the planning
commission cannot be considered a "committee composed solely of
members of the governing body." Thus, committees consisting of
both councilmembers and their appointees must comply with the
Brown Act.
BrownActReport
3
'I
c,< ?{~: r,2 S
The Attorney General has opined that two subcommittees consisting
of less than a quorum of the members of two boards of supervisors
could meet to discuss mutual water problems without violating the
Act. Each subcommittee fits within the "less than quorum
exception."
2. Seriatim Meetinqs:
Related to the "less than a quorum" exception is the problem of
the "seriatim" meeting. "Seriatim" means"in a series" or "one
after another." The Attorney General addressed this subject in
1980. The factual background was that a community redevelopment
staff would hold meetings with the city council and city planning
commission in private. The meetings were held on or about the
same date but the groups were broken up so that at no time was a
quorum of any governmental body present at any given meeting.
However, all members of the city councilor planning commission
would meet with the agency staff with respect to the same subject
matter. The purpose of these meetings was to "brief" the council
and planning commission on redevelopment proposals so that they
might be better prepared when the plans came to them for public
deliberation and action.
The Attorney General concluded that these meetings violated the
Brown Act. The Sacramento case, supra, was cited for the
proposition that these meetings permitted the "crystallization of
secret decisions to a point just short of ceremonial acceptance."
This was demonstrated by the fact that in some instances the
redevelopment staff's proposals were abandoned based on the
reaction of the city council and/or planning commission, thus
demonstrating that even "action" may be taken with no public
knowledge or discussion. It was further demonstrated that many
matters discussed at these "seriatim" meetings were approved at
the city level with little or no public discussion because of the
knowledge already obtained in the earlier meetings. This was
held to violate the public'S right to be informed at all stages
of the legislative or administrative processes of its governing
body.
In reaching this conclusion, the Attorney General cited an
earlier unpublished opinion rendered in 1967. In that opinion, a
city council in setting the salaries of certain high-ranking city
officials did so in a series of nonpublic meetings. Two council-
members (less than a quorum) met and discussed the salaries.
Subsequently, one of these two councilmen met individually with
the remaining three councilmen and informed them of the results
of the two member meeting. At no time did a quorum of the city
council discuss the pay raises at the same meeting. However, as
a result of these informal meetings, a new salary schedule was
delivered to the city manager and placed into a city ordinance.
The Attorney General concluded that the Act was violated despite
the fact that a quorum of the council had never actually met at
the same time.
BrownActReport
4
"r
/ / /- -.-.,., ~
~-(-:-) G.< .x b
The problem these opinions present for a five member council is
clear. If two councilmembers should informally discuss an issue
coming before the city and then if either one of them should go
on to discuss it with yet another councilmember, a quorum would
have discussed the issue in "seriatim" meetings according to the
Attorney General's opinions. If this series of meetings takes
place with the "intent to deorive the oublic of information to
which it is entitled", a violation of the Brown Act may occur.
The same problem exists where a private individual seeks to
discuss with the individual councilmembers a matter which will
come before the city council. While it is a First Amendment
right for an individual to speak to his elected representatives,
it is improper for any councilmember to participate in putting
together a "seriatim" meeting. While a councilmember may discuss
a matter coming before the city with an individual without
violating the Brown Act, he or she should not encourage or assist
that individual to then discuss it with a quorum of the city
council, nor should the councilmember discuss the matter at all
if he or she knows the matter is being discussed with other
councilmembers in private by the same individual. Of course,
caution should always be exercised in discussing scheduled public
hearing matters with citizens outside the hearing in order to
avoid due process problems (as opposed to Brown Act problems).
If such discussions take place, disclosure of the substance of
the discussions should be made during the public hearing.
F. CLOSED SESSION EXCEPTIONS:
The Act itself provides certain exceptions to the requirement
that meetings be open. but reauires certain disclosures be made
before or after such closed session. and soecifies the
descriotion of items to be included on the oosted aaenda. The
leaislative bodv is reauired to aoooint a clerk or other officer
or emolovee of the local aaencv to attend each closed session and
keeo and enter in a minute book a record of tooics discussed and
decisions mad at the meetina. The minute book is not a oublic
record and shall be keot confidential. The minute book may
consist of a recordina of the closed session. 154957.2
Closed sessions which are specifically authorized. reoorts and
aaenda descriotions reauired by the Act include the following:
(1) Grand Jury. Legislative body members may give
testimony in private before a grand jury either as
individuals or as a group. 154953.1
(2) Meet and Confer. Closed sessions are authorized in
connection with the meet and confer process to instruct
the agency's representative. 154957.6 In 61 A.G.Ops.
209 (1978) the Attorney General stated "this section is
not a blanket authorization on all "meet and confer"
items, but only for those items specified by the
section."
BrownActReport
5
"-;3c:C ~5( 7
The leqislative body must Dubliclv reDort aDProval
qiven to the bodY's representative of an item proposed
for or accepted under barqaininq in closed session at
the public meetinq durinq which the closed session is
held or. if there are no members of the Dublic Dresent
when the closed session ends. at its next meetinq. The
reDort shall identifY the time approved and the other
Dartv or parties to the neqotiation if the aqreement
with respect to that item is final with the bodY's
approval and has been accepted or ratified bv the other
Dartv. 154957.1
The item shall be desiqnated on the aqenda as:
"Conference with Aqencv Labor Neqotiator" and shall
specifY the name of anv orqanization of employees with
whom the neqotiations to be discussed are beinq
conducted. or the names and titles of individual
emplovees. unrepresented bv an orqanization. with whom
the neqotiations to be discussed are beinq conducted.
(3) License applications. Closed sessions may be used to
determine whether an applicant for a license who has a
criminal record is sufficiently rehabilitated to obtain
the license. 154956.7 Minutes of closed sessions, held
in violation of the Brown Act, that involve criminal
records are not exempt from disclosure. . Reqister Div
of Freedom Newspapers. Inc. v. Oranqe County, 205
Cal.Rptr. 92 (1984)
The item shall be desiqnated on the aqenda as:
"License/Permit Determination" and shall specifY the
number of license or Dermit applicants involved.
(4) Property transactions. Legislative body may hold a
closed session with its negotiator prior to the
purchase, sale, exchange, or lease of real property by
or for the local agency. 154956.8
Theleqislative bodY must DUbliclv report aDDroval
qiven to the bodY's neqotiator concerninq real estate
transactions after the aqreement is final. upon any
inquirY and at its next public meetinq. If its own
approval renders the aqreement final. the bodY shall
report that approval. the substance of the aqreement
and the vote thereon in open session at the public
meetinq durinq which the closed session is held. If no
member of the public is Dresent after such session. the
report shall be qiven at the next meetinq. If the
approval rests with another Darty. the fact of
approval. substance of the aqreement and the bodY's
vote thereon shall be reported upon inquirY bv any
person as soon as the other party has informed the
local aqencv of its approval.
BrownActReport
6
23cz -;;; y
The item shall be desianated on the aaenda as:
"Conference with Real Protlertv Neaotiator" and shall
stlecifv. bv street address. or. if there is not a
street address. bv tlarcel number. or other uniaue
reference. the real DroDertv under neaotiation. the
tlartv or tlarties who are directly or throuah an aaent
neaotiatina with the aaent of the leaislative body. It
shall also sDecifv that the conference will concern the
tlrice and terms of tlavment.
(5) security of public buildings. Closed sessions may be
held with the Attorney General, the District Attorney
the Sheriff, the Chief of Police or any of their
deputies to discuss threats to the security of a public
building or to the public's right of access to public
services or public facilities. 154957 This section
does not permit executive sessions with the chief of
police regarding ordinary matters that do not fall
within the express provisions of the Act. 61 A.G.Ops.
220 (1978).
The item shall be desianated on the aaenda as: "Threat
to Public Services or Facilities" and shall stlecifv the
name. title. and aaencv of any law enforcement officers
to be conferred with; or shall be desianated "Public
Emtllovee Atltlointment" and shall stlecifv the title or
descritltion of any tlosition to be filled bv the
atltlointment; or shall be desianated "Public Emtllovee
Hirina"
(6) Personnel. Closed sessions are authorized to consider
the appointment, employment, evaluation of performance
or dismissal of a public employee, or to hear
complaints or charges brought against such an employee
by another person or employee. As a condition to
holdina a closed session on the comtllaints or charaes
to consider discitllinarv action or to consider
dismissal. the emtllovee shall be aiven written notice
of his or her riaht to have a tlublic hearina rather
than a closed session. If notice is not aiven. any
discitllinarv or other action taken aaainst the emtllovee
in the closed session shall be null and void.
"Employee" does not include anv elected official.
member of a leaislative bodY. or tlerson enaaaed as an
indetlendent contractor who. durina the enaaaement.
tlrovides services to multitlle clients or customers
other than the local aaencv. It does include the City
Manager, City Attorney and City Clerk. 154957
BrownActReport
7
...( :;,) -- <'7 e9
.._---'c< ~
The actual decision to appoint, employ or dismissL
transfer. accept the resianation of. or otherwise
affect the emploYment contract of a public employee
must be publicly reported at the public meeting durina
which the closed session is held or. if no member of
the public is present after such session. the report
shall be aiven at the next meetina. Anv report
reauired shall name the emplovee. position affected and
shall specifY compensation. iob classification or
title. and assianment to any specific location. A
report of dismissal or of the nonrenewal of an
emploYment contract shall be deferred until the first
public meetina followina the exhaustion of
administrative remedies. if any. 154957.1(a) (5)
In San Dieao Union v. city council of the citv of San
DiegQ (1983) 146 C.A.3d 947, the court concluded that a
city council may not set the salary of its appointed
employees in closed session. The court did note that
it would be proper to evaluate the performance of these
employees in closed session and further noted that:
"Common sense compels the conclusion that
oblique references to discussions of salaries
for specific individuals within executive
sessions evaluating the performance of that
public employee would not violate the Brown
Act so long as the specific discussions as to
the amount of salary increase are reserved for
a properly noticed public meeting."
Under controlled circumstances. an ad hoc A-two member
agency committee may be formed to meet with these
employees, discuss salaries in private, and report back
to the full agency in a public meeting.
The item shall be desianated on the aaenda as: "Public
Emplovee Appointment" and shall specifY the title or
description of any position to be filled bv the
appointment: or shall be desianated "Public Emplovee
Hirina" and shall specifY the title or description of
any position to be filled bv hirina: or shall be
del.ianated "Public Emplovee Performance Evaluation" and
shall specifY the name and position of any employee who
is under consideration for a chanae in compensation or
benefits: or shall be desianated "Discipline/Dismissal
of One or More Public Emplovees."
(7) Litigation. Until January 1, 1985, the litigation
exception to the ,Brown Act had always been
characterized as an "implied" exception.
The Attorney General held that litigation existed upon
service to an agency of a proposed cease and desist
order. 69 A.G.Ops. 230 (1986).
BrownActReport
8
. ~ I ;'"'_,
/ -<" ')/'
L.'\.. ) L-/I... - .-o:"'L)
, _:J
In 1984 the legislature added Sections 54956.8 and
54956.9 to the Brown Act and placed the litigation
exception into the statute. "Litiaation" includes any
ad;udicatorv Droceedina. includina eminent domain.
before a court. administrative bodY exercisina its
adiudicatorv authority. hearina officer. or arbitrator.
In 1987, section 54956.9 was amended to indicate that
the exceptions listed are the exclusive expression of
the lawyer-client privilege for closed sessions. but
does not limit or otherwise affect the Drivileae as it
mav aDDlv t~ written or other communications outside
meetinas between the leaislative body or its members
and the lea~l counsel to the bodY. Under this law,
there are three permissible reasons to go into closed
session to discuss litigation. They are:
(1) The litigation is existing:
(2) There is significant exposure to litigation:
or
(3) The litigation is being initiated by the
Agency.
"Existina facts and circumstances" for DUrDOSeS of
determinina whether there is a sianificant eXDosure to
litiaation or whether a closed session is authorized.
shall consist only of one of the followina:
tal Facts and circumstances that miaht result in
~itiaation aaainst the aaencv but are not vet
known to a Dotential Dlaintiff and need not
be sDecified.
Cb) Facts and circumstances. includina. but not
~imited to. an accident. disaster. incident.
or transactional occurrence that miaht result
in litiaation aaainst the aaencv and that are
known to a Dotential Dlaintiff and shall be
sDecified Drior to the closed session.
Cc) The receiDt of a claim or other written
communication threatenina litiaation which
claim or communication shall be available for
Dublic insDection.
Cdl A statement made in an ODen and Dublic
meetina threatenina litiaation made by a
Derson on a sDecific matter within the
resDonsibility of the leaislative body.
Ce) A statement made outside an ODen and Dublic
meetina threatenina litiaation made bv a
BrownActReport
9
/] 'C)_
,""'-- ::> C(
c') ,
-5/
~erson on a s~ecific matter within the
res~onsibilitv of the leaislative body so
lona as the official or em~lovee of the
leaislative body receivina the threat makes a
contem~oraneous record of the communication.
which record shall be available for ~ublic
ins~ection.
If the closed session is to discuss existing litigation
the Agency must state publicly the title to the
litigation (unless to do so would jeopardize either the
agency's ability to ~ffectuate service of process, or
to conclude existing settlement negotiations to its
advantage). 154956.9
The item shall be deeianated on the aaenda as:
"Existina Litiaation" and shall identifY. bv reference
to the claim and the claimant's name or the case numher
of the adverse ~artv. any claim or case under
discussion. If the identification would ieocardize the
aaencv's ability to effectuate service of crocese. the
~hrase "uns~ecified to ~rotect service of ~rocess"
shall be used instead of the identification. If the
identification would ieo~ardize the local aaencv's
ability to conclude existina settlement neaotiations to
its advantaae. the ~hrase "uns~ecified to ~rotect
settlement advantaae" shall be used.
In the case of a closed session to discuss "significant
exposure" to or init~..'ltion of litigation, the item
shall be desianated on the aaenda as: "Anticicated
Litiaation" and shaLl. refer to closed sessions called
~ursuant to subdivision (bl or (cl of section 54956.9.
and shall indicate. after the ~hrase "As defendant."
the number of distinct cases or ~otential cases to be
discussed as instances or antici~ated litiaation
aaainst the aaencv. and after the ~hrase. "As
~laintiff." the number of distinct claims or cases to
be discussed as instances of antici~ated litiaation to
be filed bv the aaencv.
The leaislative body shall ~ubliclv re~ort any action
taken in closed sesE ion and the vote or abstention of
everv member ~resent thereon:
Grantina a~~roval to the body's leaal counsel:
(al to ~rosecute defend. or seek or refrain from
seekina a~~ellate review or relief. or to
otherwise enter as a ~artv. intervenor. or
amicus curiae in any form of litiaation.
(bl to settle ~endina litiaation at any staae
~rior to or durina a iudicial or auasi-
BrownActReport
10
/) -
<,,- 3 [( -35(
iudicial ~roceedina after the aareement is
final. u~on any inauirv and at its next
~ublic meetina. If its own a~~roval renders
the aareement final. the body shall re~ort
that a~~roval. the substance of the aareement
and the vote thereon in o~en session at the
~ublic meetina durina which the closed
session is held. If no member of the ~ublic
is ~resent after such session. the re~ort
shall be aiven at the next meetina. If the
a~~roval rests with another ~artv. the fact
of a~~roval. substa~ce of the aareement and
the bodY's vote thereon shall be re~orted
u~on inauirv bv any ~erson as soon as the
other ~artv has informed the local aaencv of
its a~~roval.
(c) Dis~osition reached as to claims discussed in
closed session shall be re~orted as soon as
reached in a manner that discloses the name
of claimant. name of local aaencv claimed
aaainst. substance of claim. and any monetarY
amount a~~roved for ~avment and aareed u~on
bv the claimant.
(8) Another exception permitting a closed session was
added in 1989. Gov. Code 554957.8 permits the holding
of a closed session for multi-jurisdictional drug law
enforcement agency to discuss the case records of any
ongoing criminal investigatim., to hear testimony, and
to discuss courses of action.
(9) In 1990 another exception was added permitting closed
sessions for joint powers agencies for purposes of
insurance pooling, to discuss a claim for the payment
of tort liability losses, public liability losses, or
workers' compensation liability incurred by the joint
powers agency or a local agency member of the joint
powers agency. 154956.95
The item shall be desianated on the aaenda as:
"Liabilitv Claims" and shall s~ecifv. with res~ect to
each claim to be discussed. ~he claimant's name and the
claim number. if any. and the name of the local aaencv
that the claim has been filed aaainst.
(10) No other exceptions. In 1987 the legislature enacted
into law the definitive limitation on closed sessions.
section 54962 reads, in relevant part, as follows:
"Except as expressly authorized by this chapter...,
no closed session may be held by any legislative body
of any local agency."
BrownActReport
11
", 2
'<)(.-1 r-:13
G. LIMITATIONS ON DISCUSSION AND ACTION:
In 1987 the requirement went into effect that an agenda
containing a brief general description of each item of business
to be transacted or discussed at the meetinq must be posted at
least 72 hours before a reqular meeting by the legislative body
of the local agency, or its desiqnee. An aaenda will be
considered sufficient if it informs an interested member of the
oublic about the subiect matter under consideration to that he or
she can determine whether to monitor or oarticioate in the
meetina of the bodv. It then provides as follows:
~ IJ
"No action or discussion shall be undertaken on any item not
appearinq on the posted aqenda. exceot that members of a
leaislative bodv mav brieflv resoond to statements made or
auestions Dosed bv oersons exercisina their oublic testimonv
riahts under Section 54954.3. In addition. on their own
initiative. or in resoonse to auestions Dosed bv the oublic.
members of the leaislative bodv mav ask a auestion for
clarification. orovide a reference to staff or other
resources for factual information. or reauest staff to
reoort back to the bodv at a subseauent meetina concernina
anv matter. Furthermore. a member of a leaislative bodv. or
the bodv itself. mav take action to direct staff to olace a
matter of business on a future aaenda." 554954.2(a)
Section 54954.2(b) specifically authorizes the Council to take
action on an item of business not on the aqenda in any of the
followinq three situations:
The majority finds that an emerqency exists as defined
in 554956.5. >
Two-thirds of the council find that "the need to take
action arose subsequent to the agenda beinq posted."
The item was posted for a prior meetinq of the Council
occurring not more than five (5) days prior to the date
the action is taken and was continued from the prior
meeting to the meeting at which action is taken.
Section 54954.3 requires a local aqency to provide an opportunity
for members of the public to directly address ~le council. This
provision is implemented throuqh an "oral communications" item on
each council agenda. A 1991 revision to this section requires
such opportunity to be afforded before or durinq consideration of
the item. Unless the item has been substantially chanqed, an
opportunity for oral communication is not required if an
opportunity to address the leaislative bodv on anv item that has
alreadv been considered bv a committee comoosed exclusivelv of
members of the leaislative bodv. at a oublic meetina wherein all
interested members of the oublic were afforded the oooortunitv to
address the committee on the item. before or durina the
committee's consideration of the item.
(1)
(2)
(3)
BrownActReport
12
~) ~.
~-)(l -3c-1
H. PENALTIES/REMEDIES:
1. Criminal:
"Each member of a legislative body who attends a meeting of that
legislative body where action is taken in violation of any
provision of [the Brown Act], with intent to deDrive the Dublic
of information to which it is entitled under this chaoter, is
guilty of a misdemeanor." 154959 If there is deliberation
without action, the criminal penalty is not applicable and only
civil proceedings are available. Sacramento Newsoaoers Guild v.
Sacramento Countv Bd of Suoervisors , 69 Cal.Rptr 480 (1968).
Not every violation of open meeting laws is a violation of the
misdemeanor section. ~ However, it is the participation by the
members of the legislative body, not the outcome of the vote,
that gives rise to criminal liability. That the collective
decision is tentative rather than final does not shield ltnowing
participants from criminal liability. 61 A.G.Ops. 283 (1978).
If a conspiracy to commit a misdemeanor occurs, it can be a
felony. Pen. Code 1182.
2. Civil:
Even if a criminal penalty is not applicable because action has
not been taken, the Act, nevertheless, may be enforced to prevent
further or future violations, as the Act can be enforced by civil
action for activities beyond those covered by the Penal
provisions. Sacramento Newsoaoers Guild.suora. The Act allows
the district attorney or any interested person to bring an action
to stop or prevent violations of the Brown Act. 154960
The court may award attorney's fees and court costs to wnichever
party prevails. 154960.5 section 54960.1 provides a procedure
whereby a decision made in violation of agenda restrictions may
be declared null and void.
I. VALIDITY OF ACTION TAKEN AT UNLAWFUL MEETINGS:
Given the importance which both the legislature and courts have
placed on the public policy underlying the Brown Act, it might
seem logical that action taken at an unlawful meeting would
automaticallv be invalidated. This is not the case. The courts
have uniformly held that the validity of actions taken at a
meeting claimed to have been held in violation of the Brown Act
are DQt void automaticallv. but voidable 1udicial action. This
provision is found in Section 54960.1.
Failure to receive notice given pursuant to Section 54954.1
shall not constitute grounds for any court to invalidate the
actions of the legislative body for which the notice was given.
However. if written notice is not aiven to an emoloyee oursuant
to Section 54957. of the riaht to haye a oublic hearina rather
than a closed session. the closed session will be null and void.
BrownActReport
13
~
-'\ i c:( -3J
J. MISCELLANEOUS:.
The Brown Act contains a number of other provisions dealing with
such subjects as notice of meetings, the right of the public to
attend meetings and to speak, the right of members of the public
to tape record meetings, and the right of the Council to exclude
all persons from meetings where a disturDance has Deen created.
While these subjects have not been discussed in any detail in
this report, they are addressed in the Act. Below are some
examoles of miscellaneous Brown Act orovisions:
ell Anv taoe or film record made at the direction of the
local aaencv shall be a oublic record and mav not be
erased or destroved for 30 davs after the taoina or
recordina. 154953.5
e2l Anv writinas intended for distribution to members of
the leaislative bodv are oublic records and must be
made available whether or not actuallv distributed to.
or received DV. the leaislative bodv at the time of
reauest for coovina. 154957.5
e3l No later than one hour orior to resumotion of the
adiourned or continued meetina for which oostina of the
notice or order is reauired. notice of adiournment or
continuance must be aiven DV teleohone or facsimile
transmission to the news media which has reauested
notice of soecial meetinas and which has orovided
teleohone or facsimile transmission numhers for this
ouroose. 154956.9
e4l No action for iniurv to a reoutational or other
oersonal interest mav be commenced in anv court or
aaencv bv or on behalf of anv emolovee with resoect to
whom a disclosure is made bv a leaislative bodv in
comoliance with rSection 54957.11.
BrownActReport
14
...,.50 -3(':'
02-23.-93. TUE 1121:46 Advocatio~
P_02
.DaTB LOCJU. CilOVDJlMI.'l" COIIIUftB.
..D.~Or Mariaa 88%9..0D. Cba~D
VUSIOJl:
8n:
IDUl.aIJlG:
"ISCAL:
COJfSOL'l'U'l' :
12/7/92 S
First B
02/24/93
Yes 3
Manatt 6
S.Date Bill 36 - aopp
BROWN ACI'REVlSIONS (URGENCY)
.ackaroun4;
with limit.ed exceptions, the Ralph M. Brown Act requires
local officials to hold their ...tinge in public. The Brown
Act declares that "the people insist upon remaining informed
so that they may retain control over the agencies whiCh serve
thelll."
The heart of the Brown Act is a single sentence whiCh reads,
"a:U lIeetings of the lCillJislative body of a local CllJency shall
be open and public, and all persons shall be permitted to
attend any meeting of the legislative body of a lccal agency,
except as otherwise provided in this chapter." Although the
Act defines some terms, questions arise as to what
constitutes a "meeting," a "legislative bOdy," and a "local
agency." When local officials can hold closed meetings also
remains controversial.
LOCal agencies interpret the Act in different ways. So.e
interpretations violat.e the spirit of the Brown Act if not
its statutes. After compi!ing a long list of alleged Brown
Act abuses, the California First Amendment Coalition, the
California Newspaper Publishers Association, and others want
the Legislature to strengthen the Brown Act.
.
~roDose4 LaWI
Senate Bill 36 changes eight areas of the Brown Act:
I. DefinitioDs. Senate Bill 36 changes or adds several
definitions to the Brown Act:
. Leaislative body. Under current law, a legiSlative body is
the governing board, commission, or directors of a local
agency, and any board, advisory committee, or co~ission that
e~ercises authority delegated by the legislative body.
Current law also governs any board, co~ission, or committee
created by official acts. '.Dat. Bill 36 clarifies the
definition to include boards or commissions regardless of
whether the board, commission, committee, or other body is
organized and operated by a local agency or by a private
corporation specifically created to exercise the material
authority of the legislative body. s_ate Bill 3. also
.'72
'-'''oJ Cr
37
02-23.-93 TUE 18:47 Ad_ocotion
p_"':Z:
,
5B 36 - 12/07/92 Page Z
clarifies that limited duration ad ~ committees c~pos.d
solely of members of a legislative body Which are less than a
quorum of the governing body do not have to comply with the
Brown Act, but all standing committees which meet regularly
must comply regardless of their composition.
. Elected. bU~ not sworn-in officials. CUrrent law does not
require elected officials who have not been sworn in to
comply with the Brown Act. .enate 8111 3. defines newly
elected but unsworn mambers as members of a legislative body
and requires them to follow the Brown Act.
. EI1Iplovee. The Brown Act allows closed lIleetings to
discuss the performance of an employee. CUrrent law defines
an employee as a city manager, county administrator, city
attorney, county counsel, department heads, engineers,
district secretary, auditor, assessor, or tax collector.
SeDate 8111 36 removes direct references to these positions
from the definition of an employee whose performance may be
discussed in closed session. 5B 36 also adds independent
contractors who provide services to multiple clients or to
customers other than the local agency to the list of
officials whose performance must be discussed in open
session.
. Meetinq. CUrrent law doe. not define a meetinq. SBDate
Bill 36 defines a meeting as any congregation of a majority
of the members of a legislative body at the same time and
place to hear, discuss, or deliberate on any item within the
Subject matter jurisdiction of the local agency and any use
of direct communication, personal intermediaries, or
technological devices which permits a majority of the
legislative body to become aware of an item tbat is within
the subject matter jurisdiction of the local agency and to
develop a collective concurrence on an action to be taken on
that item by the members of the legiSlative body.
Under Senate Bill 36, the definition of meeting does not
include the following as long as a majority of members of the
legislative body do not discuss among themselves specific
business under their jurisdietion:
* Individual contacts between officials and their
constituents.
* General conferences which are open to the public.
* An open and publicized meeting organized to address a
topic of local community concern by a person or
organization other than the local agency.
* Purely social or ceremonial occasions.
'/:Z -,
~J C:c:5'X
02-23-93 TUE 10=47 Advocation
p_e.~.,
5B 36 - 12/07/92 page 3
. Pendina litlaation. The Brown Act permits c~osed
meetings to discuss pending litigation. Under current lav,
pending litigation includes those in~t4nces where an agency
has decided or is deciding to initiate litigation, where
"there is a significant exposure to litigation" for the local
aqency, or where the agency is involved in a formally
initiated proceeding. "a.~. Bill 36 defines "facts and
circumstances" required to show "significant exposure" to the
following:
· Those that might result in litigation against the
agency where potential plaintiffS are unknown.
* A claim received pursuant to the Tort Claims Act,or
other written threat.
* Any oral threat made during a public meeting.
* Any threat received outside of a public meeting where
contemporaneous notes are kept and available for public
inspection.
. Public work Droiect. Under current law, a local agency
includes a nonprofit corporation created by one or more local
agencies with one or more board members appointed by the
local agency and whose purpose is to acquire, maintain, or
construct any public work project. Under semat. Bill 36, a
public work project includes any "infrastructural"
improvement or structure and its ~ssociated services and
activities which are intended for pUblic rather than private
residential benefit.
II. Aaen~as .D~ DOcument.. The Brown Act sets various
guidelines relating to agendas and written materials.
. Meaningful aaendas. CUrrent law requires local
officials to post an agenda 72 hours before each regular
~eetin9' The agenda must contain a brief general description
of each item of business to be discussed. 8.uate Bill 36
requires the agenda to contain a meaningful description of
each item to be discussed. As defined in S8 36, "meaningful"
Deans "SUfficient to inform an interested member of the
pUblic about the subject matter under consideration so that
he or she can determine whether to monitor or participate in
the meeting ..." S8 36 permits agendas to include references
documents related to the agenda.
. Items not on the aaenda. Current law prohibits local
officials from discussing an item whiCh is not on the agenda
and from taking action on a non-agenda item in most cases.
Senat. 8ill 35 allows local officials to respond briefly to
."" '3c,. -.3 '7
02-23-93 TUE 10:48 Adv~cati~~
._--E". _.. 0 5
SB 36 - 12/07/92 Page 4
statements made by the public on non-agenda items if members
of the public have raised non-agenda questions during each
meeting's time for public comment. SB 36 also l$ts local
officials ask fOllow-up questions for clarification and
direct staff to place items on future agenda.. SB 36 l~its
looal OfficialS' ability to take action on non-agenda Items
whioh arose Subsequent to agenda posting to only those where
2/3 vote that there i. need to take i...diate action.
e ODen mike time. CUrrent law requires looal officials to
inClude on their regular meeting agendas a time for members
of the public to address the legislative body on any item of
interest to the public within the jurisdiction of the agency
before or during legiSlative consideratIon of the item.
..Date Bill 36 require. local officials to include a time for
public comment on each agenda of special meetings prior to
decisions being made on the it_so
· Public criticism. CUrrent law allows local officials to
go into closed session to discuss personnel matters. Citing
this ability, some local officials stop speakers from
commenting on public employees' actions during ~peakers'
remarks at open mike time. Senate Bill 36 expressly
prohibits local officials from undermining individuals'
constitutionally protected speech if the criticism is
directed at their agency's policies or actions.
· Written documents. CUrrent law declares that any
document distributed to lOCal officials at a public meeting
are pUblic records and that local officials may charge for
copies. Senate Bill 16 clarifies that the documents include
those distributed to the legislative body by persons
testifying to the agency and those documents intended to be
distributed except items relating to closed sessions. Public
records must be made available to the public:
* Prior to the commencement of the meetin9 if they are
intended for distribution during the meet~ng,
regardless of whether they ~ distributed.
* Immediatelv if they are prepared by a local agency or
a member of its legislative body and distributed at an
open meeting.
* Arter t~e meetinq. if prepared by some other person
and distributed.
<'"/ :?
"-,_--, LA l' c
l2I2-2~-93
TUE
1 l2I = 49
Aduoca.t.
on
p-
136
---
SB 36 - 12/07/92 Pa~e 5
. Advisorv committees. current law does not require local
officials to post an agenda for each aeeting of an advisory
ccamittee. ..nate Bill 31 requires local officials to post
an aqenda of eaCh _eting of an advisory co_ittee 72 hours
prior to the meetinq at the place where its le~islative body
lIeets.
. Closed sessions. too. CUrrent law does not expressly
require local officials to post an aqenda for closed session
aeetings. .enate Bl11 3' requires local officials to provide
an aqenda reqardinq the Closed session prior to entering the
closed session.
xxx. Aotion ~ .ecret Ballot. CUrrent law does not prohibit
local officials from voting by secret ballot. Senate Bill
36 expressly prohibits local officials from acting by secret
ballot.
xv. JleoordillCf Reaular or SlMlcia1 ....tiIlCl.. CUrrent law lets
citizens tape record any public meeting. Senate Bill 36 lets
citizens videotape, filII, or photograph a public meetinq as
lonq as the action does not cause a "persistent disruption"
of the procQQdinqs. SB 36 declares if locol officials ~o the
taping, any tape or film record of a meeting is a public
record and cannot be destroyed for 30 days from the date of
the recording. SB 36 requires local officials to ~et an
interested person listen to a tape on a recorder made
available by local officials.
SeD4te Bill 3' expressly prohibits legislative bodies from
restricting the broadcast of their meetin~s unless the body
officials find that the broadcast cannot continue without a
"persistent disruption" of their meetinqs.
v. KeetiDCI 10catioD.. CUrrent law allows local officials to
hold meetinqs in sites remote from their community, unless
their local ordinance expressly forbids remote meetinqs.
.eDate Bill 3' requires the official by-laws to specify the
placQ of the regular meetings and prohibits locol officials
frOD meeting outside their jurisdiction with the followinq
reasons:
· Federal or state law requires the meeting to be held
elsewhere.
* Inspectinq property which can not be conveniently
brouqht within the jurisdiction's territory.
~} -I
.c< -; c.- - <4--, -( J'
-~" ~ I
02-23-93 TUE 10:49 Ad~ocation
-----E... _ 121"7
5B 36 - 12/07/92 Page 6
* Participating in Dulti.agency .eetings whose meeting
is in another participating agency's jurisdiction anel
is open and noticed by all agencies.
* If the agency has no facility within the
jurisdiction's territory it may aeet in the closest
available facility or in its principal otfice
outsiele the territory.
* To meet with elected or appointed state or federal
officials regarding an issues affecting the local
agency, where the member. -.ske a substantive report at
their next regular -.eting within their jurisdiction.
· To meet at an agency-owned facility which is outside
the jurisdiction's territory to discuss only items
related to that facility.
· Visit the office of the local agency's legal counsel
for closed session if it would reduce legal fees and is
noticed as a SPecial meeting.
school board members have other exceptions allowing them to
Deet outside their jurisdiction. These meetings must be
noticed as a special meeting and open to the public, and
members must report the substance and outcome at their next
regular meeting in the district. Additional exceptions for
school boards:
· Attending a collective bargaining seminar sponsored
by the California Foundation for Improvement of
Employer-Employee Relationships.
* Interviewing members of the public residing
elsewhere regarding the employment of the
superintendent of that district.
All agencies must reschedule meetings Which fall on holidays
to the next business day,
CUrrent law prohibits local officials from meeting in a
location Which discriminates against persons based on race,
creed, color, national origin, ancestry, or sex. SeDate BIll
3' prohibits local officials from meeting in areas in-
accessible to wheelchairs or areas in which members or the
public may not be present without makinq a payment or
purchase.
During emergencies, current law allows local officials to
hold meetings in a place not designated by their ordinance.
seaate BIll 36 requires local offIcIals to notify local media
representatives who have asked to be told about any changes
in location "by the most rapid means of communication
available at the time."
,1:/..-,
"_J c., .
<{J
"<
02-23-93 TUE 10:50 Ad~ocation
P_0B
58 36 - 12/07/9a Page 7
VZ. Clo..d ....10... Current law allows local officials to
meet in closed session to discuss threats to public security,
aatters affecting national security, ~nding litigation,
license applications requested by person. with criminal
records, real property n89otiations, and negotiations and
evaluations of pUblic emPIOrees. Curr.nt law also lets
agencies which P4rticipate n joint powers agreements to go
into closed session to discu.. in.urance pools and tort
liability losses, multi-jurisdictional drug enforcemant
agencies to meet in closed ....ion to discuss case records,
and hospital districts to go into clo.ed aession to discuss
trade secrets and ~ality audits. After meeting in closed
session, local OffIcial. must report baCk any action taken
and any roll call vote on an action Which aftects a public
employee.
· Before goina into closed session. Se.ate Bill 36
requires local officials to give detailed information about
issues Which they discuss in closed session. The information
must be in the form Qf an agenda and must describe certain
information. If t~e closed session discussion affects:
* Lice.s.s, local officials must specify the number of
licenses involved in the discussion.
* Prop.rty Deqotiatio.s, local officials must specity
by street address or parcel number the property to be
discussed and the party with whom officials will
negotiate. SB 36 also requires local officials to
identify the topic of real property discussion, whether
price, t~$ of payment, or both.
* Litigatio., local officials must note whether t~e
litigation is existing or anticipated and must
identify, in the case of existing litigation, the claim
or case nUllber and nilllle of the adverse party. If
naming the suit would jeopardize the public agency, sa
36 allows local officials to note that the case is
"unspecified to protect the service of process" or "to
protect settlement advantage." In the case of
anticipated litigation, S8 36 requires officials to
indicate the number of claims to be discussed in closed
ses510n.
* Liability clai.., local officials DU5t specity the
claimant's name and claim number, the name of the local
agency, and the claim's classification as tort
liability, public liability, or workers' compensation.
02 1
~;Jui - c~.
-----'
02-23-93 TUE 10:50 Advocation
F"_09._
"
sa )6 - 12/07/92 Page 8
* Tbreat. to publlo .ecurity, local Officials must
identify any law enforcement agents with whom they will
meet and the title or des~iption of any post to be
filled.
· Publio -.ploy.. .ppointaenta or hiring., local
officials aust specify tho title of the position to be
filled.
· PUblic -.plOy.. perforaaao. "'luatio~., local
officials must identify the employee'. name and title.
* Publio ..plOy.. di.-1...1, local officials must
identify the number of .mploy... to be considered for
dlsmiSeal.
* Labor Dagotiation., local officials must note the
name of any employees' or~anization with which they
will negotiate and any issues relating to mandatory
bargaining.
* Trade .egret., local officials must specify whether
the discussion will conoern a proposed new service,
program, or facility, and shall specify the estimated
month in which action is expected.
If local officials go into closed session to discuss multiple
items, Senate Bill 35 lets them reformat disclosure
information to eliminate duplication as long as the resultinq
notice is "reasonably clear."
. EmDlov.e disciDline or dismissal. SB 36 requires the
agency to give the e~loyee written notice of his or her
right to a pubic hearing rather than a closed session. If
notice is not provided, any actions taken in closed session
are null and void.
. ReDortinq back after a closed session. 8anate ai11 35
requires local officials to reconvene after a closed session
to report baCk any action taken and the vote or abstention of
any member present. It a decision t~en relates to:
* Property ~egotiatioD., local officials Dust report
back as soon as an agreement i. final and related votes
or actions taken pending an action by another agency.
* A 4eci.ioD to take l.gal aotion, local officials Dust
report back as soon as they directed their counsel to
take the action.
* Tbe approval of a ..ttl..aat reqar41ng peDding
litigation, local officials must report back as soon as
the settlement is final and any related votes or
actions taken pending an action by another agency.
. />; _ //4
~""/v' II
02-23-93 TUE 10:51 Advocation
P _ 1 fa
88 36 - 12/07/92 Page 9
* Disposition reaob..s r.latiaq to alat.a8, local
officials must report back as .oo~ as reached with
appropriate identification of the claims and claimant.
* -.ploy.. aettoD, local officials must report back
immediately while identifying the .-.ployee, the
position affected, and any chang. made.
* BarqaiDiDq a~ioD, local officials must report back
immediately while identifying the item approved, the
parties to the action, and if the agreement is final
and has been accepted or ratified.
.enat. Bill 31 requires local officials to publicly report,
orally or in writing, any actions taken in a closes session
and the votes and abstentions of every aember present. If no
pUblic members are present when the closed session concludes,
then reporting is delayed until the next meeting. If action
taken relates to approval given to prosecute and immediate
announcement may be delayed until notice is served on
affected partie.. For action taken to dismiss or not renew
an employment contract, reporting shall be deferred until
after any administrative remedies, if any, are exhausted.
Any contracts, settlement agreement., or other documents
approved at in the closed section shall be given to anyone
who has asked for the copies in writing. SB 36 declare. that
nothing in the bill requires a legislative body to approve an
action not otherwise SUbject to approval.
e Recordina closed meetinas. current law allows local
officials to designate a person to keep a minute book of
closed sessions. The minute book is not: a public record and
is only _ade available to the legislative body or to a judge
or grand jury. Senate Bi11 36 requires looal officials to
appoint an employee to take minutes at closed sessions.
VXI. adiourDiDCI or ContiDulDCI a ...tiDCI. current law lets
local officials adjourn or continue a public meeting to
another time provided that they give notice of their decision
to adjourn or continue. .eDate Bill 3' requires officials to
notify no later than one haur before the resumption of the
meeting. by fax or by phone, any newspaper or television or
radio station which has requested notification.
VXXI. Vio1at10Ds. The Brown Act contains several
instructions for persons interested in pursuing alleged
violators and penalties for thoBe who knowingly break the
law. Se_te B111 36 maltes several changes relating to
violations:
'/.:<'. 4--
... ':...-J [, - 5
02-23-9~ TUE 10=52 Ad~oe~tion
F" _ 1 1
5B 36 - 12/07/92 Page 10
a pur.uina an allaamd o~rmnder. current law lets
interested persons block any action taken by a leqislative
bOdy if local officials toOk the action while violating the
Brown Act. Interested persons .ust send local officials any
request to .cure and correct. an action taken within 30 days
of the date local officials took the action. If the
Intere.te~ person receive. a ju~icial determination that
local officials broke the law, the action is "null and void,"
except for contracts agreed to in qood faith.
Un~er Senata Bill 35, tnterested persons or the District
Attorney have 90 days after local officials took an action to
.ake the request to cure and correct, unless the alleged
violation took place in an open session, whereby the statue
of limitations is 30 days. SB 36 makes a correspondinq
change which gives interested persons .ore time
to beqin court action once local officials respond to the
request. SB 36 declares that contracts relating to salaries
or fees for services may be null and void if the agreements
violated the Brown Act.
a Penalties for the offender. Under current law, a local
official who attends an illegal meeting in knowing violation
of the Brown Act is guilty of a misdemeanor. Under .anat.
alII 36, a local official who attends a meeting where a
violation of the Brown Act occurs and who has intent to
cleprive the pubic of information its entitled to, is guilty
of a misdeaeanor.
s~ 36 also lets courts require the legislative body to record
its closed session if it determines that a violation has
occurred, to to restore the public's confidence in the body'S
compliance with this chapter, or to deter violations.
co_ental
1. Lots of problems. lots of chanaes. Since the Legislature
passed the Brown Act in 1953, government watchdogs have
tallied a growing list of violations by local officials. Not
all are intentional, but all of them restrict the public'S
right to know about actions taken by their local governments.
Host of the problems could be solved with several revisions
to the Brown Act, like tighter definitions, more disclosure
about closed meetings, and even training sessions for alleged
violators. The watchdogs' suggested improvements, contained
in a single attempt to rewrite major portions of the Brown
Act, is SB 36.
')7 1 /
~~)t:t.- b
02-221;-:-93
TUE
10 :~
Ad......ocCltion
P_B1
58 36 - 12/07/92 page 11
2. Last vear. Last year the COlPllittee heard S8 1538 (KopP)
and AB 3476 (Burton), two lIlajor Brown Act reforlll bills. The
Legislature passed and the Governor vetoed these bills.
GOvernor wilson, thouliJh .papathati!;: to the intent of these
.easures, stated his concerns reqardinq additional costs to
local agencies.
3. A.oeneies' costs. SB 36 does not address the costs wh!-ch
the bill iaposes on local agencies as a result of the
increased. agendll requir_ents. Last year, the Legislative
Analyst estimated SB 1538 could cost up to $2 million
annually. The COllllllittee ..y "ish to consider whether
additional requireaents are needed despite extra costs to
local ageneies.
4. A1'1)li08tion to other entities. S8 36 does not applY Brown
Act revisions to the Legislature's open meeting law
(Grunsky-Burton) and state agencies' open meeting law
(Ba9Iey-Keene). The c01llllittee may wish to consider whether
these other statues should conforll to the changes lIlade by 5B
36.
8uooort and ~sition: (02/18/93)
SUDDort: california First Amendlllent coalition, california
Newspaper pUblishers Association, American ASsociation of
Retired persons, California Association of Alternative
Newsweeklies, City and county of San Francisco, County
Taxpayers League of sacramento county, william Graber
(Georgia.na Ranch Nursery), Carl Jensen, Ph.D., Homeowners of
Encino, San FranciscO Firefighters LOcal 798.
OoD05ition: ASSociated of Builders and contractors,
Association of california Hospital Districts, Association of
california Water Agencies, california Municipal utilities
Association, city of vernon, League of California Cities.
.~? .
-"..-' (A ~ 4 7
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
LEGISLATIVE ANALYSIS
May 7. 1993
Bill AUTHOR TiTlE INTRODUCED AMENDED I
ACA 25 WOODRUFF HIGHER EDUCATION: 4/26/93 I,
0- I
MINIMUM FUNDING Ii
CITY POSITION lEAGUE POSITION RELATED BillS ADDRESSED BY lEG. PROGRAM
PENDING OPPOSE NONE YES; SEC. I.B.1.a.
STATUS: PENDING ASSEMBLY COMMITTEE ON HIGHER EDUCATION
BACKGROUND: THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION, AMENDED BY PROP 98 IN 1988 AND BY PROP
111 IN 1990, ESTABLISHES A GUARANTEED MINIMUM LEVEL OF STATE FUNDING
FOR SCHOOL DISTRICTS AND COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICTS.
ACA 25 would: APPLY THE SAME CONSTITUTIONAL PROVISIONS APPLICABLE TO SCHOOL
DISTRICTS AND COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICTS TO INSTITUTIONS OF "HIGHER
EDUCATION", DEFINED AS THE CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY AND UNIVERSITY
OF CALIFORNIA SYSTEMS AND THE CALIFORNIA MARITIME ACADEMY.
AS WITH ALL PROPOSED CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENTS, THIS BILL, IF
APPROVED TO BE SUBMITTED TO THE VOTERS BY A TWO-THIRDS MAJORITY OF
THE RESPECTIVE HOUSES OF THE CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE, WOULD BECOME
EFFECTIVE ONLY IF APPROVED BY A MAJORITY OF THE VOTERS VOTING ON THE
PROPOSITION. (JUNE 1994 BALLOT).
NOTE: NOT REFERENCED IN THE PROPOSAL IS THE SUBSTANTIAL ABILITY FOR
THESE INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCA TION TO RAISE FUNDS FOR OPERA TIONS
INDEPENDENTL Y OF STA TE FUNDING - A CASE WHICH IS NOT COMMON TO
PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICTS AND COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICTS.
FISCAL IMPACT: AS A RESULT OF THE DECREASED FLEXIBILITY IN BUDGET MANAGEMENT
INDUCED BY GUARANTEED FUNDING LEVELS FOR CERTAIN GROUPS,
COMPETITION FOR FUNDS AVAILABLE TO THE REMAINING ENTITIES MANDATED
BY THE STATE TO PROVIDE SERVICES WOULD INCREASE DRAMATICALLY.
DATE TO COUNCIL
5/13/93
RECOMMENDATION
OPPOSE
LETTERS
YES
C:\WP51 \ANAl YSES\ACA25.ANA
/3 -"./
;... {:c - "'f ,y
.....
'"";..
(
CAUI"OIINlA I.ECIS1.A 1URt:-19ll3-9t IIF.cvt..AR SESsION
A:lScmbly Constitutional Amendment No. 25
_. -
(
Introduced by A$Jembly Mell1bers Woodruff and Eutin
(Coauthor: Senator Hayden)
April 26, 1993
.,
~embly Constitutional Amendment No. 25-A resolution
to propose to the people of the State of California an
amendment to the Constitution of the State, by amending
Sections 8 and 8.5 of Article XVI thereof, relating to
postsecondary edu~tion.
(
LEGISLATTVE COUNsEL'S DICEST
ACA 25, as introduced. Woodruff. Postsecondary
education: minimum fundIDg.
The California Constitution, as amended by Proposition 98
on November 8. 1988, and Proposition 111 on June 5, 1990,
among other things, establishes a constitutionally guaranteed
minimum level of state funding {or school districts and
Community college districts.
Under exi~"ting law, as added by Proposition 98 and
amended by Proposition Ill, 50% of state revenues in excess
of the state"s appropriations limit is required to be transferred
and allocated to Sections A and B o{ the Stale School Fund in
proportion to the enrollment in school districts and
commUnity college districts, respectively, and is required to
be eltpended solely for instructional improvement and
accountability, as specified,
nus measure would apply those constitutional prOvisions to
institutions of public higher education. as defined.
VOle: :y" Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes.
State-mandated local program: no.
"1I(l
'72 - 1-D
.;X._~ C<<- - !
1-'_10:::1:"::--&0'
I:
I
t
II
.'
;
" v.'.' .
....
t
,~'" ~
\j~ ~
", ~
i" IJ
o
v J
,,\ 'll
,~ <I
III
m
II
,..
11
..
N
..
III
:J
I-
III
IJ\
I
,..
N
I
or
m
ACA 25
-2-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Po';
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
Resolved by the Assembly, the SenJJte concurring. That
the Legislature of the State of California at its 1993-94
Regular Session commencing on the seventh day of
December 1992, two-thirds of the members elected to
each of the two houses of the Legislature voting therefor
hereby proposes to the people of the State of Califo~
that the Constitution of the State be amended as follows'
First-That Section 8 of Article XVI thereof ~
amended to read:
SEC. 8. (a) From all IItMe State revenues there shall
first be set apart the moneys to be applied by the MMe
State for support of the public school system and Inlhli€
institutions of public higher education.
(b) Commencing with the 1990-91 fiscal year the
moneys to be applied by the ttete State for the su~port
of school disbicts and community college districts and
commencing with the 1994-9!J fiscal year, the moneys t~
be applied by the State lor the support of institutions 01
public higher education, shall be not less than the greater
of the following amounts:
(1) The amount which, as a percentage of General
Fu~d revenues which may be appropriated pursuant to
Article xm B, equals the percentage of General Fund
revenues appropriated for school districts llIl4
community college districts, and institutiolJ9 of publi~
higher education, respectively, in fiscal year 1986-87.
(2) The amount required to ensure thal the total
allocations to school dlstricts MEt, community college
districts, and inltitutiOlJ9 ofpublic higher education from
General Fund proceeds of taxes appropriated pursuant to
Article XIII B and allocated local proceeds of taxes shall
not be less than the total amount from these sources in
the prior fiscal year, excluding III1Y revenues allocated
pursuant. to subdivision (a) of Section 8.5, adjusted for
changes m enrollment and a~usted for the change in the
cost of living pursuant to paragraph (I) of subdivision (e)
of Sec~on 8 of Article xm B. This paragraph shall be .
operativ~ only, in a fiscal year in which the percentage
growth m California per capita personal income is less
than or equal to the percentage growth in per capita
'-.
-3-
ACA 25
1 General Fund revenues plus Me MIl one-half of _ 1
2 percent.
3 (3) (A) The amount required to ensure that the total
4 allocations to school districts MEt. community coDege
5 districts, and institutions ofpubl1c higher education from
6 Gemeral Fund proceeds of taxes appropriated pursuant to
7 Article XIll B and allocated local proceeds of taxes shall
8 equal the total amount from these sources in the prior
9 fiscal year, excluding any revenues allocated pursuant to
10 subdivision (a) of Section 8.5, adjusted for changes In
11 enrollment and adjusted for the change in per Cllpita
12 General Fund revenues.
13 (8) In addition, an amount equal to one-half of _1
14 percent times the prior year total allocations to school
15 districts lIIIlI. community coneges, and institutiOll8 of
16 public higher education from General Fund proceeds of
17 taxes appropriated pursuant to Article XIII B and
18 allocated local proceeds of taxes, excluding any revenues
19 allocated pursuant to subdivision (a) of Section 8.5,
20 adjusted for changes in enrollment.
21 (C) This paragraph (3) shall be operative only in a
22 fiscal year in which the percentage growth in California
23 per capita personal income in a fiscal year is greater than
24 the percentage growth in per capita General Fund
25 revenues plus _ W one-half of _ 1 percent.
26 (c) In any fiscal year, if the amount computed
27 pursuant to paragraph. (1) of subdivision (b) exceeds the
28 amount computed pursuant to paragraph (2) of
29 subdivisicn (b) by a difference that exceeds one and
30 one-half percent of General Fund revenues, the amount
31 in excess of one and one.half percent of General Fund
32 revenues shall not be considered allocations to school
33 districts _, community colleges, and institutiOIl9 of
34 public higher eduClltion for purposes of computing the
35 amount of slate aid pursuant to paragraph (2) or 3 (3)
36 of subdivision (b) in the subsequent fiscal year.
37 (d) In any fiscal year in which school distrlch -,
38 community college districts. and institutions of public
39 higher education are allocated funding pursuant to
40 paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) or pursuant to
.. ''''
\
~I ACA 25 -4- -5- ACA 25
1 subdivision (h), they shRI.I be entitled to. maintenanc'" 1 Rsca1 year.
n. a factor, equal to the difference between (1) the lIIIIount 2 (h) Subparagraph (8) of paragraph (3) of subdivision
3 of Gen~ral Fund moneys which would have been 3 (b) may be suspended for ODe year only when made part
I 4 app~opnated P\U1UImt to peragraph (2) of subdivision " of or included Within my bill enacted pursuant to Section
5 (b) if that paragraph bad been operative or the lIIIIount 5 12 of Article IV. All other provisiona of subdivision (b)
6 of General Fund mo.neys which would have been 6 may be suspended for one year by the enactment of an
7 appropriated pursuant to subdivision (b) had subdivision 7 urgency statute pursuant to Section 8 of Article IV,
8 (b) not been SUSpended, and (2) the amount of General ~ - 8 provided that the urgency statute may not be made part
9 Fund moneys actu~ apprOpriated to school districts 9 of or included Within any bill enacted pursuant to Section
10 Mtti , Community co ege districts, and institutions r:Jf 10 12 of Article [V,
11 public higher education in that fiscal year, 11 (I) "Institutions of public higher education," for
12 (e) The maintenance factor for school districts 8IKI 12 pUl"pOSes of this section, mtJaru the following:
13 community college districts, and institutions of puhb'~ 13 (1} The CaHlornia State University and each campus,
14 higher education determined pursuant to subdivision (d) 14 branch, and function thereof.
15 shall be adjusted annually for changes in enrollment and 15 (Z) The University of California and each campus,
16 adjusted for the change in the cost of living pursu~t to 16 branch, and function thereof.
c 17 paragraph (1) of subdivision (e) of Section 8 of Article 17 (3) The CaHlomia Maritime Academy.
0 18 XU! B, until it has been allocated in full. The 18 Secon~ That SectIon 8.5 of Article XVI thereof Is
19 1Damte~ance lactor shall be allocated in a manner 19 amended to read:
). ", ~ 20 det,ennmed by the Legislature in each fiscal year in 20 SEC. 8.5. (a} In addition to the amount required to
'-.J 21
0.., ~ which the percenta:te growth in per capita General Fund - - 21 be applied for the support of school districts 8IKI,
:;:, u 22 revenues exceeds e percentage growth in CaIilomia 22 communlty college dlstricts, and institutions of pubHc
0 23 per capita personal income. The maintenance hctor shall 23 higher education pursuant to Section 8, the Controner
J
'll 24 be reduced each year by the lIIIIount allocated by the 24 shall during each fiscal year transfer and allocate all
v' 25
, <I Legislature in that fiscal year. The minimwn 25 revenues avallable pursuant to paragraph .. (1) of
'- 26 maintenance lactor lIIIIount to be allocated in a fiscal year ...~ 26 subdivision (a) of Section 2 of Article XIll B to that
01 'l:T shall be equal to the product of General Fund revenues 27 portion of the State School Fund restricted for
M1 28 from proceeds of taxes and one-half of the difference 118 elementary and high school purposes, _ to that portion
.. 29
between the percentage growth in per capita General 29 of the State School Fund restricted for community
N 30 Fund revenues from proceeds of taxes and in California 30 college purposes, re8llsslively, and to the GeneraJFund
..
31 per capita personal Income, not to exceed the total dollar 31 for purposes of allocation to institutions of public higher
UJ 32 amount of the maintenance factor. ' 32 education, in proportion to the enrolhnent in school
J 33 (f) For purposes of thIs section, "changes in 33 districts fIIHi, community college districts, and
I- 34 ~,"rollment" shall be measured by the percentage change ...~ 34 institutions of public higher education, re"pectlvely.
35 m average datly attendance. However, in any A.sca1 year, 35 (1) With respect to funds allocated to that portion of
III 36 there shalJ be no adJustment lor decreases in enrollment 36 the State School Fund restricted for elementary and high
III 37 between the prior fiscal year and the clJlTent fucal year 37 school purposes, no transfer or RI.Iocatlon of funds
1 38 tmIess there have been decreases In enrollment between 38 pursuant to this sectioo shall be required at any time that
r-
N 39 the second prior fiscal year 8Jld the prior fiscal year and 39 the Director of Finance and the Superintendent of Public
I -40 between the third prior fUcaJ year 8Jld the secoDd prior 40 Instruction mutually determine that current annual
t
t '...
m
111
III
Q.
t
o
(, -
~~~
)::\ 0
. 0
V, )
'll
fj<<
III
VI
..
(II
..
111
:J
I-
"'
III
I
I'
(II
I
1
III
ACA 25
-6-
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
1:5
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
2.4
25
26
'i:T
28
29
30
:n
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
expenditures per student equal or exceed the average
annual expenditure per student of the 10 states with the
highest annual expenditures per student for elementary
and high schools, and that average class sI2e equals or is
less than the average class size of the 10 states with the
lowest class size for elementary and high schook
(2) With respect to funds allocated to that portion of
the State School Fund restrlded for community college
pmposes, no transfer or allocation of funds pursuant to
this section shall be required at any time that the
Director of Finance and the Chancellor of the California
Community Colleges mutually determine that current
annual expenditures per student for community colleges
in thi! ttete State- equal or exceed the average annual
expenditure per sllldent of the 10 states with the highest
annual expenditures per sllldent for community colleges.
(3) With rerpect to funds allocated to the General
Fund For purposes of allocation ro institutions oE public
higher education, no transfer or allocation of Funds
pursuant to this section shall be reql1ired at any time that
the Director of Fmance and the Trustees of the California
State University, the Regents of the University of
California, and the CslifomJa M8J'itime Academy Board
of Cavemon mutually determine that current annual
expenditure$ per student For institutions of public higher
education ln tbls State equal or exceed the average
annual expenditure per student of the 10 states with the
highest annual expenditures per student for institutions
of public higher education.
(b) Notwithstanding tIte llyeWilellll sf Article XIll B
funds allocated pursuant to this section shall not
constitute appropriations subject to limitation.
(c) From any funds transferred to the State School
Fund or allocated to the General Fund pUTSl.1llllt to
subdivision ~ the ControDer shall each year allocate to
each school ' 'ct lllltI,communitycollegedistrict and
institution of public hJgher education an equal ani'ount
per enrollment In school district! from the amount in that
portion of the State School Fund restricted for
elementary and high school purposes 1lIl&, an equal
... ,...
'. )
~. }i
-7-
ACA 25
1 amount per enrollment In community college districts
2 from that portion of the State School Fimd restricted for
3 community college purposes, and an equal amount per
4 enroRment in institutions of public higher education
IS from the General Fund.
6 (d) All revenues allocated pursuant to subdivision (a)
7 shall be expended solely for the purposes of instructional
8 improvement and accountability as required by law.
9 (e) Any school di!trict maintaining an elementary or
10 secondary school shall develop and ClIuse to be prepared
11 anannual audit accounting fOT such funds and shall adopt
12 a School Accountability Report Card for each school.
13 (f) "Institutions of public higher education," For
14 purposes of this section, means the following:
15 (1) The CaliFornia State University and each campus,
16 branch, and function thereof.
17 (2) The University oE Ca1JfomJa and each campus,
18 branch, and function thereof.
19 (3) The California Maritime Academy.
o
99 1110
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
LEGISLATIVE ANALYSIS
May 6, 1993
Bill AUTHOR TinE INTRODUCED AMENDED
AB 22B6 PRINGLE BOOKING FEES 3/5/93 --
CITY POSITION LEAGUE POSITION RELATED BillS ADDRESSED BY LEG. PROGRAM
PENDING SUPPORT NONE YES; SEC. I.B.I.b.
STATUS: PENDING ASSEMBLY PUBLIC SAFETY COMMITTEE
BACKGROUND: EXISTING LAW PROVIDES FOR THE COLLECTION BY COUNTIES, FROM ARRESTING
AGENCIES, OF FEES FOR THE ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS IN BOOKING AND
PROCESSING OF ARRESTEES. EXISTING LAW ALSO AUTHORIZES A COURT, AS
A CONDITION OF PROBATION, TO ORDER A CONVICTED PERSON TO REIMBURSE
THE COUNTY OR ARRESTING AGENCY FOR THESE FEES AND PROVIDES THAT A
JUDGEMENT OF CONVICTION MAY CONTAIN AN ORDER FOR THE PAYMENT OF
THE BOOKING FEE.
AB 2286 would: * REDEFINE ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS IN CONNECTION WITH BOOKING AND
PROCESSING ARRESTED PERSONS;
* EXEMPT A CITY FROM THE PAYMENT OF FEES IN CERTAIN
CIRCUMSTANCES;
* REQUIRE THE COURT TO ORDER A CONVICTED PERSON, AS A CONDITION
OF PROBATION, TO REIMBURSE THE COUNTY OR ARRESTING AGENCY FOR THESE
FEES;
* REQUIRE THAT THE JUDGMENT OF CONVICTION CONTAIN AN ORDER FOR
PAYMENT OF THE FEE.
FISCAL IMPACT: IN FISCAL YEARS '90-'91 THROUGH '92-'93, THE CITY HAS BEEN INVOICED FOR
APPROXIMATELY $595,000 BY THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, AND THE ESTIMATE
FOR FISCAL YEAR '93-'94 IS ANOTHER $270,000 FOR A TOTAL OF $865,000 IN
JUST 4 YEARS. AB 2286 WOULD SIGNIFICANTLY REDUCE THE CITY'S LIABILITY
FOR PAYMENT OF BOOKING FEES.
DATE TO COUNCIL
Legislative Committee
5/13/93
RECOMMENDATION
SUPPORT
LETTERS
YES
C:\WP5 1 \ANAl YSES\AB22B6. ANA
r}2- "7
'" .r._:.:, :::::>
:.-' LA - -"-
[A> <A]
[D> <D]
\
contains added text, and
contains deleted text.
.,
CA AB 2286
04/22/93
Page 1
Introduced
ASSEMBLY BILL
No. 2286
===============================================================================
Introduced by Assembly Member Pringle
March 5, 1993
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
An act to amend sections 29550 and 29550.1 of the Government Code,
relating to booking fees.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
AB 2286, as introduced, Pringle. Booking fees.
Existing law provides for the collection by counties, from arresting
agencies, of fees for administrative costs as specified in booking and
processing arrested persons.
This bill would redefine administrative costs as specified and would
exempt a city from the payment of fees in certain circumstances.
Existing law authorizes a court as a condition of probation to order
a convicted person to reimburse the county or arresting agency for these
fees and provides that a judgment of conviction may contain an order for
the payment of the criminal justice administration fee.
This bill would require the court to so order reimbursement as a
condition of probation and would require that the judgment of conviction
contain an order for payment of the fee.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes.
State-mandated local program: no.
The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
SECTION 1. section 29550 of the Government Code is amended to read:
29550. (a) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a county may
impose a fee upon a city, special district, school district, community
college district, college, or university for reimbursement of county
expenses incurred with respect to the booking or other processing of
persons arrested by an employee of that city, special district, school
district, community college district, college, or university, where the
arrested persons are brought to the county jail for booking or
detention. The fee imposed by a county pursuant to this section shall
not exceed the actual administrative costs, [0> including applicable
overhead costs as permitted by federal Circular A-87 standards <0]
[A> as defined in subdivision (d) <A] , incurred in booking or otherwise
processing arrested persons. A county may submit an invoice to a city,
special district, school district, community college district, college,
or university for these expenses incurred by the county on and after
2-3&< ~CS1
CA AB 2286
04/22/93
Page 2
July 1, 1990.
(b) [A> (1) Notwithstanding sUbdivision (a), a city shall not be
charged fees for arrests on any bench warrant for failure to appear in
court, nor on any arrest warrant issued in connection with a crime not
committed within that city's jurisdiction. <A]
[A> (2) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), a city shall not be charged
fees for a person who is ordered by a court to be remanded to the county
jail except that a county may charge a fee to recover those direct costs
for those functions required to book a person pursuant to subdivision
(g) of section 853.6 of the Penal Code. <A]
[A> (3) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), a city shall not be charged
fees for arrests made pursuant to arrest warrants originating outside of
its jurisdiction. <A]
[A> (4) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), no fees shall be charged to a
city on parole violation arrests or probation-ordered returns to
custody, unless a new charge has been filed for a crime committed in the
arresting city's jurisdiction. <A]
[A> (5) An agency making a mutual aid request shall pay fees that result
from arrests made in response to the mutual aid request except that in
the event the Governor declares a state of emergency, no agency shall be
charged fees for any arrest made during any riot, disturbance, or event
that is subject to the declaration. <A]
[A> (6) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), no fees shall be charged to a
city for the arrest of a prisoner who has escaped from a county, state,
or federal detention or corrections facility. <A]
[A> (7) Notwithstanding sUbdivision (a), no fees shall be charged to a
city for arrestees held in temporary detention at a court facility for
purposes of arraignment when the arrestee has been previously booked at
a city detention facility. <A]
[A> (8) Notwithstanding subdivision (a), no fees shall be charged to a
city as the result of an arrest made by its officer assigned to a formal
multiagency task force in which the county is a participant. For the
purposes of this section, "formal task force" means a task force that
has been established by written agreement of the participating agencies.
[A> (9) In those counties where the cities and the county participate in
a consolidated booking program and where prior to arraignment an
arrestee is transferred from a city detention facility to a county
detention facility, the city shall not be charged for those tasks listed
in subdivision (d) that are a part of the consolidated booking program
which were completed by the city prior to delivering the arrestee to the
county detention facility. However, the county may charge the actual
administrative costs for those additional tasks listed in subdivision
(d) that are performed in order to receive the arrestee into the county
detention facility. <A]
[A> (c) <A] Any county whose officer or agent arrests a person is
entitled to recover from the arrested person a criminal justice
<3CA c' 55'
CA AB '2286
04/22/93
Page 3
administration fee for administrative costs it incurs in conjunction
with the arrest if the person is convicted of any criminal offense
related to the arrest. The fee which the county is entitled to recover
pursuant to this subdivision shall not exceed the actual administrative
costs, including applicable overhead costs [D> as permitted by federal
Circular A-87 standards, <D] incurred in booking or otherwise processing
arrested persons. A judgment of conviction may contain an order for
payment of the amount of the criminal justice administration fee by the
convicted person, and execution may be issued on the order in the same
manner as a judgment in a civil action, but the order shall not be
enforceable by contempt. The court [D> may <DJ [A> shall <AJ , as a
condition of probation, order the convicted person to reimburse the
county for the criminal justice administration fee [A> including
applicable overhead costs <AJ .
[D> (c) <DJ
[A> (d) As used in this section, "actual administrative costs"
include only those costs for functions that are performed in order to
receive an arrestee into a county detention facility. Operating expenses
of the county jail facility including capitol costs and those costs
involved in the housing, feeding, and care of inmates shall not be
included in calculating "actual administrative costs." "Actual
administrative costs" may include anyone or more of the following as
related to receiving an arrestee into the county detention facility: <AJ
[A> (1) The searching, wristbanding, bathing, clothing, fingerprinting,
photographing, and mental screening of an arrestee. <AJ
[A> (2) Document preparation, retrieval, updating, filing, and court
scheduling related to receiving an arrestee into the detention facility.
[A> (3) Warrant service, processing, and detainer. <AJ
[A> (4) Inventory of an arrestee's money and creation of cash accounts. <AJ
[A> (5) Inventory and storage of an arrestee's property. <AJ
[A> (6) Inventory, laundry, and storage of an arrestee's clothing. <AJ
[A> (7) The classification of an arrestee. <AJ
[A> (8) The direct costs of automated services utilized in paragraphs
(1) to (7), inclusive. <AJ
[A> (9) Unit management and supervision of the detention function as
related to paragraphs (1) to (8), inclusive. <AJ
[A> (e) <AJ An administrative screening fee of twenty-five dollars
($25) shall be collected from each person arrested and released on his
or her own recognizance upon conviction of any criminal offense related
to the arrest other than an infraction. A citation processing fee in the
amount of ten dollars ($10) shall be collected from each person cited
and released by any peace officer in the field or at a jail facility
upon conviction of any criminal offense, other than an infraction,
related to the criminal offense cited in the notice to appear. However,
~~J~) C <
""..,,' '"""\ Cr. '---.--> (:J
--- .
CA AB 2286
04/22/93
Page 4
the court may determine a lesser fee than otherwise provided in this
subdivision upon a showing that the defendant is unable to pay the full
amount. All fees collected pursuant to this subdivision shall be
transmitted by the county auditor monthly to the Controller for deposit
in the General Fund. This subdivision applies only to convictions
occurring on or after the effective date of the act adding this
subdivision and prior to June 30, 1996.
SEC. 2. Section 29550.1 of the Government Code is amended to read:
29550.1. Any city, special district, school district, community
college district, college, university, or other local arresting agency
whose officer or agent arrests a person is entitled to recover any
criminal justice administration fee imposed by a county from the
arrested person if the person is convicted of any criminal offense
related to the arrest. A judgment of conviction [D> may <D] [A> shall <A]
contain an order for payment of the amount of the criminal justice
administration fee by the convicted person, and execution may be issued
on the order in the same manner as a judgment in a civil action, but the
order shall not be enforceable by contempt. The court [D> may <D]
[A> shall <A] , as a condition of probation, order the convicted person
to reimburse the city, special district, school district, community
college district, college, university, or other local arresting agency
for the criminal justice administration fee.
END OF REPORT
;..:3G---- 5 7
APPENDIX:
Item 19 CDBG: Background; Program
Recommendations; and social service Projects.
summary;
Funding