HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 1993/01/05
Tuesday, January 5, 1993
4:00 p.m.
'" declare under penalty of perJury that I a1'II
employed by the City of Chura Vista in the
Office of the Ci~\' C[::)t<"': ~mj th(tl~ I posted
this A:::;(:n:c,F~c;jr:e 0n the nulle~;n Board at
the pUj~res Bu.ldinj and at~on C il Ch b
/('-2 8,1 -, . ounc am ers
DATED, ~ ~ SIGNED. ~- Public Services Building
Resrular Meetin!! of the City of Chula Vista City Council
CAlJ. TO ORDER
1.
ROIL CAU.:
Councilmembers Fox ~ Horton _, Moore _, Rindone ~ and Mayor
Nader _
2. PLEDGE OF AlLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG. SILENT PRAYER
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: December 8, 1992.
4. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY:
a. Presentation of visitors from Sister City Odawara, Japan by International Friendship Chair
Nancy Taboada.
b. Presentation of proclamation commending the dedication and service of Libraty Director,
Rosemary Lane.
CONSENT CALENDAR
(Items 5 through 12)
The staff recommendations regarding the following items listed under the Consent Ca1endm will be t!fIQJ;ted by the
Council by one motion without discussion unless a CounciJmember, a member of the public or City staff requests
that the item be puIkd [or discussion. If you wish to speak on one of these items, please fill out a "Request to
Speak Form" available UI the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. (Complete the green form
to speak in favor of the staff recommendation; complete the pink form to speak in opposition to the staff
recommendation.) Items pulled from the Consent Calendor will be discussed after Boord and Commission
Recom.mendalions and Action Items. Items pulled by the public will be the first items of business.
5. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS:
a. Letter requesting the removal of stop signs located at Canyon Drive and Cumbre and at
Country VISta Drive and Sandy Creek Court - Residents at Bonita Long Canyon.
b. Claims against the City - Claimant No. 1. 2. 3 and 4: Benjamin Dayro Corpuz, Phillip Dayro
Corpuz, by Benjamin Gundran Corpuz, his Guardian Ad Litem, Mark Christopher Dayro
Corpuz, by Benjamin Gundran Corpuz, his Guardian Ad Litem, Aidesiderio Aguas Alhambra
II, by Desiderio A. Alhambra, his Guardian Ad Litem, c/o Kevin F. Calcagnie, Esq., Robinson
& Phillips, 26722 Plaza Street, Suite 230, 501 W. Broadway, Suite 1350, P.O. Box 9010,
Mission Viejo, CA 92690-7010; Claimant No.5: Linda Mary Onderko, c/o Harvey R.
Hasson, Attorney at Law, 402 W. Broadway, Suite 400, San Diego, CA 92101; Claimant No.
6. 7 and 8: Evelia Martinez, Ambrosia Angelica Martinez, by Evelia Martinez, Rosario
Sarmiento, 115 E. Queen Ann Drive, Chula Vista, CA 91911. It is the recommendation of
the City's claims adjustors, Carl Warren & Company, and Risk Management, that these
claims be denied.
c. Letter of resignation from the Growth Management Oversight Commission - Frank A.
Tarantino, 1006 Paseo del Paso, Chula Vista, CA 91910. It is recommended that the
resignation be accepted and the City Clerk be directed to post immediately according to the
Maddy Act in the Clerk's Office and the Public Library.
Agenda
-2-
January 5, 1993
6. ORDINANCE 2538 AMENDlNG TIiE ZONING MAP OR MAPS ESTABIJSHED BY SECTION
19.18.010 OF TIiE MUNICJPAL CODE REZONING 0.3 ACRES LOCATED ON
TIiE WEST SIDE OF DEL MONTE AVENUE, SOUTH OF MAIN STREET,
FROM R-l-6-P (second readin~ and adoDtion) - The item involves
consideration of a proposal to amend the Montgomery Specific Plan/Chula
Vista General Plan by the redesignation of a certain 1/3 acre parcel ofland,
located in the southwesterly quadrant of West Main Street and Del Monte
Avenue, from "Low/Medium Density Residential" and "R.1.6.P" to "Research
and Limited Industrial" and "I-L-P" (Margarita Romero. applicant). Staff
recommends Council place the ordinance on second reading and adoption.
(Director of Planning)
7. ORDINANCE 2539 AMENDING TIiE ZONING MAP OR MAPS ESTABIJSHED BY SECTION
19.18.010 OF TIiE MUNICJPAL CODE REZONING 13.48 ACRES LOCATED
ON TIiE WEST SIDE OF DEL MONTE AVENUE, SOUTH OF MAIN STREET,
FROM I-L-P TO C-C-P AND R-2-P AND ADOPTING P DISTRICT
REGill.ATIONS (second readin~ and adoDtion) - The request is an
application for the redesignation and rezoning of 13.48 acres, amending
the Chula Vista General Plan/Montgomery Specific Plan. The three areas
in question are: a) Adobe Plaza (Sepehri property privately initiated) 4.56
acre area located on the northeasterly quadrant of West Main and
Broadway (Subarea 1); b) East Sommerset (City initiated) 4.00 acre area
located on the southeasterly quadrant of West Anita and Broadway
(Subarea 2); and c) Property south of Anita Street with 4.92 acre area,
located at the northeast boundary and adjacent to the southeasterly
quadrant of West Anita Street and Broadway (Subarea 3). Staff
recommends Council place the ordinance on second reading and adoption.
(Director of Planning)
8. RESOLUTION 16944 APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO TIiE AGREEMENT Willi LETI1ERI-
MCJNrYRE & ASSOCJATES (MARY MAY) AND TIiE BALDWIN VISTA
ASSOCJATES FOR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES TO ASSIST TIiE OTAY
RANCH TEAM GENERAL MANAGER AND AUTHORIZING TIiE MAYOR TO
EXECUTE TIiE AGREEMENT - This modification is to assist in providing
response to Planning Commission inquires; in providing project
coordination services; to assist in the preparation for scheduling and
noticing of Public Participation Program; and focus on processing of the
General Development Plan and related documents for the Otay Ranch
Project. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Deputy City
Manager Krempl) Tabled at the 12/15/92 meeting.
9. RESOLUTION 16945 APPROVING AGREEMENT (ADDENDUM #8) Willi JHK & ASSOCJATES
AND BALDWlN VISTA, LTD. FOR TRANSPORTATION PLANNING
SERVICES ON TIiE OTAY RANCH, AND AUTHORIZING TIiE MAYOR TO
EXECUTE SAME - The agreement is to prepare for and attend
community/local planning group meetings; respond to directives received
from the Otay Ranch General Manager; prepare for and attend project
related workshops and hearings; and representation at project coordination
meetings for the Otay Ranch Project. Staff recommends approval of the
resolution. (Deputy City Manager Krempl)
Agenda
-3-
January 5, 1993
10. RESOLUTION 16946 AMENDING FISCAL YEAR 1992-93 BUDGET, PROVIDING FOR AN
UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE TRUsr FUND APPROPRIATION TO 1HE
UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE ACCOUNT - The City pays for its
Unemployment Insurance Claim by reimbursement. It was agreed
beginning in 1991-92 not to request the normal budget requirement but
rather to appropriate each quarter from the Unemployment Insurance
Account Fund. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of
Personnel) 4/5th's vote required.
11. RESOLUTION 16947 ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PARKWAY
COMMUNl1Y CENTER REROOFING - On 12/2/92, sealed bids were
received for Memorial Park Improvements and Parkway Community Center
reroofing. The work to be done includes, but is not limited to, building
reroofing, stuccoing and other miscellaneous remodeling items. The
project also involves the construction of complete site drainage systems.
Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Public Works
and Director of Parks and Recreation)
12. RESOLUTION 16948 ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR BROADWAY
IMPROVEMENTS FROM "1." SfREET TO NAPLES SfREET AND
CONSENTING TO 1HE SUBSTITUTION OF 1HE LOW BIDDER
SUBCONTRACTORS - On 11/18/92, sealed bids were received for the
Broadway Improvements from "L" Street to Naples Street. Staff
recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Public Works)
* * END OF CONSENT CALENDAR * *
PUBIJC HEARINGS AND RElATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
~ following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. If you wish to qH!ak
to any item, pleiJse fiH out the "Request to Speak Form" available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior
to the meeting. (CompleU! the green form to qH!ak in favor of the staff recommendation; compleU! the pink form
to qH!ak in opposiJion to the staff recommendation.) Comments are limited to five minutes per individuaL
None submitted.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
This is an opportunity for the general public to address the City Council 011 any subject 11Ulttu within the Council's
jurisdkIion that is not an item 011 this agenda. (State law, however, generally prohibits the City Council from
taking action 011 any issues not included 011 the posted agenda.) If you wish to address the Council 011 such a
subject, please complete the yellaw "Request to Speak Under Oral Communications Form" available in the lobby
and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Those who wish to speak, pleiJse give your name and address
for record purposes and foHow up action. Your time is limited to three minutes per qH!aker.
Agenda
-4-
January 5, 1993
BOARD AND COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
This is the time the CiIy Cowu:il will consider items which Iulve been forwarded to them for consideration by one
of the city's BoanJs, Commissions and/or Committees.
13. APPOINTMENT TO CIVIL SERVICI! COMMISSION - The Civil Service Commission is nominating
three individuals for the vacancy on the Commission, as provided in the Charter. The Commission
is also specifically recommending one of the three nominees, Mr. Eloy Villa, for appointment by the
Council. (Chair of Civil Service Commission)
ACTION ITEMS
The items 1isted in this section of the agenda are expected to elicit substantial discussions and deliberations by the
Coruu:iI, staff, or members of the general publU:. The items will be considered individually by the Couru:il and stoff
reconunmdaIions may in certoin cases be presented in the a/JemaJive. Those wlw wish to speaIc, p1eose fill out
a "Request to Speak" fann available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. PuhlU:
comments are limited to five minuJes.
I
14.A. RESOLUTION 16940 APPROVING AND AUTIiORIZING EXECUTION OF AN IMPLEMENTING
AGREEMENT WITH MAJOR RETAILER A (HOME DEPOT), RANCHO DEL
REV COMMERCIAL CENTER, AND RELATED CI!QA FINDINGS - The
Development Agreement covers the parcels to be purchased by Home
Depot, Kmart and The Price Company and requires Implementing
Agreements be entered into prior to the issuance of building permits. Staff
recommends items be continued to 1/19/93. (Director of Community
Development) Continued from the meeting of 12,'15/92.
B. RESOLUTION 16941 APPROVING AND AUTIiORIZING EXECUTION OF AN IMPLEMENTING
AGREEMENT WITH MAJOR RETAILER B (KMART), RANCHO DEL REV
COMMERCIAL CENTER, AND RELATED CI!QA FINDINGS
C. RESOLUTION 16942 APPROVING AND AUTIiORIZING EXECUTION OF A PUBUC FAOUTIES
FINANONG AND IMPLEMENTING AGREEMENT WITH MAJOR RETAILER
C (THE PRICI! COMPANY), RANCHO DEL REV COMMERCIAL CENTER,
AND RELATED CI!QA FINDINGS
ITEMS PULLED FROM TIlE CONSENT CALENDAR
This is the time the City Council will discuss items whil:h 1wve been removed from the Consent Calendar. Agenda
items pulled at the request of the publU: will be considered prior to those pulled by CounciJmembers. PuhlU:
comments are limited to five minuJes per individual
OTHER BUSINESS
15. CI1Y MANAGER'S REPORT(s)
a. Scheduling of meetings.
Agenda
-5-
January 5, 1993
16. MAYOR'S REPORT(S)
17. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilman Fox
a. Strategies for attracting environmentally sound businesses to Chula Vista.
ADJOURNMENf
The City Council will meet in a closed session immediately following the Council meeting to discuss:
Pending litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 - Jones lntercable.
Participation in pending litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 - between Laidlaw
vs. Bay Cities and EDCO.
Pending litigation pursuant to Government Code SectIon 54956.9 - Cervantes vs. City of Chula Vista.
The meeting will adjourn to (a closed session and thence to) a Special Meeting for Public Goal Setting on
Thursday, January 7,1993 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Conference Room, thence to a Special Closed Session
on Monday, January 11,1993 at 2:30 p.m. with Federal Magistrate Louisa Porter at U.S. District Court, 940
Front St., San Diego, CA, to discuss Jones Intercable Lawsuit, thence to the Regular City Council Meeting
on January 12, 1993 at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers.
A Meeting of the Redevelopment Agency will be held immediately following the City Council meeting.
-
:': - "1
i I mo.rot .1hdu ftJ2& tl (~?11&-I ;?/l ~ t
,e1;1 j~~ ~~ V ...0,'
.pt.,,( ~ ., flit! R~PWIVEO
4tda t.J~ ,v!. . <I, '0 .' 7 ~ fli'.trt ,Pll.3'
?J21. .~ ,a
-,:-.,..--. ~.::--'.--.---._~:.-~-'..
:t-:..."
'hf~~
I'dt:d-
I ..fro';:; &;' 1
· S 7()j/
WI
. S 1't),<J .
2.
rl
I
',~h~
-S.U ~ ~~~
,.
~~~~~)L.~~~;/ Z-
II . ,.f'
~ . ' . ".G/ " -?~~~<". .t!cwflJ~.:#~
,
~(
.
. i ~ ..oct1 ~ ~;(U!e.'l":&.A~ -Lue' ~~..d/
Ii . ,. ., .
i I ~ ~ ,..Z;;; A LU.a''l4~ ~ '7//fJ-f
."~."~C~) .1 ~WR-zgJ~I~~M,-i1A.u""'I'~~ .. ...'.~ / '
'/.'\.' Iv . I n':.... ~Uj JIft IC~"t"S.".:;)a. -
.~\i.. ~\ \.<c 'ij"~\' .
.Ud&i: ~ :#~~ S7tJ~ ~:/ -t1~ ~/i' &~ ~-tL-
t?~,zk to/IeP" {btbJu;V4t4'r ~e41f' 0/ j~ {'/~..C:~.
"
. .
"'"
( j
I
~
.. .. ]< ','
, "
\ \
. ,.,.j" ...--...,.
~.,...~.. '. "''':'~1
;.,~- >~,,~q' .~~:.' ,,:
~"'.t.~-~"":'_!""~
c
.... ~
,.
'd""
I'll m~C'b.L-.-
- -------....-. .............~......
;, i-
~ )
\ --; ~
.
,
. '" .
. 5a....:.;::<
.,.,",,,,,,,
_ .; ~~'-""~" .,......"',.,J, ."., ,-,~,,~,_,
ITEM TITLE:
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
Claimant No. 1:
Claimant No. 2:
Claimant No. 3:
Claimant No. 4:
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
52
Item
Meeting Date 1/5/93
Claims Aqainst the City
Director of personnel~
ci ty Manaqer k'it,
k"
(4/5ths Vote: Yes No~)
Mr. Benjamin Dayro Corpuz
Mr. Phillip Dayro Corpuz, by
Benjamin Gundran corpuz, his Guardian Ad Litem,
Mr. Mark Christopher Dayro corpuz, by
Benjamin Gundran corpuz, his Guardian Ad Litem,
Mr. Aidesiderio Aquas Alhambra II, by
Desiderio A. Alhambra, his Guardian Ad Litem
Kevin F. Calcaqnie, Esq.
c/o Robinson , Phillips
26722 Plaza street, suite 230
501 W. Broadway, suite 1350
P. O. Box 9010
Mission viejo, CA 92690-7010
On November 23, 1992, claims within the jurisdiction of the superior
Court were filed aqainst the city by the above four claimants, for personal
injuries they alleqedly received on May 28, 1992. The traffic cOllision
report indicates the driver of a Chevrolet Blazer was speedinq southbound
in the 00 Block of Third Avenue when he lost control and struck a center
median, resultinq in severe injuries to the teenaqe driver and occupants.
The claims alleqe a danqerous condition of public roadway, includinq
improper speed control, siqnaqe, markinqs, maintenance and desiqn, amonq
other thinqs.
Due to remote liability on the part of the City,
dation of the city's claims adjustors, Carl Warren'
Manaqement, that these claims be denied.
it is the recommen-
company, and Risk
Claimant No.5:
Ms. Linda Mary Onderko
c/o Harvey R. Hasson
Attorney at Law
402 West Broadway, suite 400
San Dieqo, CA 92101
On December 8, 1992, a claim for an amount within the jurisdiction
of the Municipal Court was filed aqainst the city by Ms. Linda Mary
Onderko, for injuries she alleqedly received when she tripped and fell over
a water meter cover on Oaklawn Avenue.
Form A-113 (Rev. 11/79)
Sb--j
ITEM
MEETING DATE:
5b
1/5/93
Due to remote liability on the part of the City, it is the recommen-
dation of the city's claims adjustors, Carl Warren ,company, and Risk
Management, that this claim be denied.
claimant No. 6: Ms. Evelia Martinez
Claimant No. 7: Ms. Ambrosia Angelica Martinez, by
Ms. Evelia Martinez
Claimant No. B: Ms. Rosario sarmiento
115 E. Queen Ann Drive
Chula Vista, CA 91911
On December 7, 1992, claims within the jurisdiction of the Superior
Court were filed against the city by Ms. Evelia Martinez, Ms. Ambrosia
Angelica Martinez and Ms. Rosario sarmiento, for personal injuries they
allegedly received on June 30, 1992. Ms. Evelia Martinez was attempting
to turn from a center turn lane into a business driveway when she turned in
front of a Chula vista Police Officer who had the right-of-way on a through
street.
Although liability is questionable, we are continuing our investiga-
tion and it is desirable to start the statute of limitations. It is the
recommendation of our claims adjustors, Carl Warren' Company, concurred in
by Risk Management, that these claims be denied.
RECOMMENDATION: Deny the above eight claims.
j
5//.,.2,
FRANK A. TARANTINO
~I006~paseo:d~I~Paso
Chula Vista, California, 91910
IlEC'
December 10, 1992
\jJ 0~'l1
( (]'/'I\-
~Jt-
~~ 101
mC") ~
:>O::x:
=>'Sc::
v>r-
0:1> a
::i< -
C'5~ ~
As a result of my appointment to the Chula vista13~annlRg Commission
on November 17, 1992, I hereby submit my resignation, effective im-
mediately, as a member of the Chula Vista Growth Management Oversight
Commission.
~
::0
f'I1
(")
f'I1
-
<
f'I1
o
Hon. Tim Nader, Mayor of Chula Vista
Members of the Chula Vista City Council
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, California, g1910
Dear Mr. Mayor and Members of the Council,
I have enjoyed my three years on the GMOC and feel proud of the
role this Commission has played in the monitoring of the threshold
standards established by the City. Moreover, I feel privileged to
have been able to work with an excellent City staff and conscientious
colleagues. I appreciate the opportunity to become involved in city
government via the Boards and Commissions and look forward to the
new challenges in my role as Planning Commissioner.
T:
Frank A. Tarantino
c: Will Hyde
a:j; J;/crc ('I)
0M~~
0:' ~C?/~
~ esJ~~
\YIU"I'l"Elt, CON\f"UI"iCA'rIC~\S
/n~
.5c'l Y-;/?y
.
r\\O~
rS;)O<(~
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENaQrd'- THE
ZONING MAP OR MAPS ESTABLISHED BY SECTIO~~~iN.010 OF
THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE REZONING ~~..reRES LOCATED
ON THE WEST SIDE OF DEL MONTE A7. ~. SOUTH OF MAIN
STREET, FROM R-1-6-P to I-L-P . '.
,";-/
ORDINANCE NO.
.2S.:JT
WHEREAS, a duly verified application for a rezoning was filed
with the Planning Department of the City of Chula vista on April 9,
1992 by Margarita Romero; and
WHEREAS, said application requested that 0.3 acres located on
the west side of Del Monte Avenue, south of Main Street, be rezoned
from R-1-6-P (Single Family Residential with Precise Plan) to I-L-P
(Limited Industrial with Precise Plan); and
WHEREAS, the Planning commission held a public hearing on
November 12, 1992 and voted 5 to 0 to recommend that the City
Council enact an ordinance to rezone said property to I-L-P; and
.
WHEREAS, the city Council set the time and place for a hearing
on said rezoning application and notice of said hearing, together
with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of
general circulation in the city and its mailing to property owners
within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least
ten days prior to the hearing; and
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place
advertised, namely 6:00 P.M., December 15, 1992, in the council
Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the City Council and said
hearing was thereafter closed; and
WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator has concluded
that there would be no significant environmental impacts and
recommends adoption of the Negative Declaration issued on IS 92-39.
NOW, THEREFORE the City Council of the city of Chula Vista
does hereby find, determine and ordain as follows:
SECTION I: Environmental
The City council finds that
significant environmental impacts
Declaration issued on IS 92-39.
the project would
and adopts the
have no
Negative
SECTION II: Findings
.
The city council finds that the rezoning is consistent with
the city of Chula vista General Plan as amended concurrently with
this action and that the public necessity, convenience, general'
welfare, and good zoning practice support the rezoning to I-L-P.
.. ~ , 2/16/11. ~
. q~ d. .:...t'<-'ft D
6-1
.
The City Council finds that, pursuant to Section 19.56.041 of
the Zoning Ordinance, following circumstance is evident which ~
allows application of the "P" Precise Plan modifying district to
this site:
The property or area to which the P modifying district is
applied is an area adjacent and contiguous to a zone allowing
different land uses, and the development of a p cise plan will
allow the area so designated to coexist between and usages which
might otherwise prove incompatible.
SECTION III: Rezoning
Section 19.18.010 of the Chula Vista nicipal Code (being the
zoning map) is hereby amended to rezo the Property to I-L-P
(Limited Industrial with Precise PIa Modifier) as shown on
Exhibit B attached hereto. The Dist ct Regulations for the P
modifier district are attached hereto as Attachment A.
SECTION IV: This ordinance sh
force on the thirtieth day from an
I take effect and be in full
after its adoption.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
B~'!: ~;.~
City Attorney
~
Robert A. Leiter
Director of Planning
P,\bamclllllonleylrom.ord
~
~ t,.~
.
.
.
COUNCil.. AGENDA STATEMENT
ITEM TITLE:
Item~?
Meeting Date 1~tm2 ~.J
Public Hearing: GPA-92-Q1 and PCZ-92-B; Proposal to amend the
Montgomery Specific PlanIChula Vista General Plan and rezone
approximately 1!3 acre located in southwesterly quadrant of West Main
Street and Del Monte Avenue, from "LowlMedium Density Residential"
and R-l-6-P to "Research and Limited Industrial" and I-L-P - Margarita
Romero, applicant
!J Resolution / Jr , J ") Approving Montgomery Specific
General Plan Amendment GPA-92-QI r'-nO~
o p.OO
/I. Ordinance ~ J ~~&~~~2-B
lilt
Plan!
SUBMITI'ED BY:
Director of Planning
City Managerl?
(4/5ths Vote: Yes_No.xJ
REVIEWED BY:
This item involves consideration of a proposal to amend the Montgomery Specific PlanIGeneral
Plan by the redesignation of a certain 1/3 acre parcel of land, located in the southwesterly
quadrant of West Main Street and Del Monte Avenue, from "Low/Medium Density Residential"
and R-1-6-P to "Research and Limited Industrial" I-L-P (Margarita Romero - applicant).
The proposed Montgomery Specific PlanIGeneral Plan Amendment and rezoning would enable
the applicant to submit project plans for the development of the site. No specific proposal has
been submitted by the applicant as of this date. The applicant is now requesting a plan
amendment to resolve the conflict between the existing industrial use of his propell)' and its
residential designation on the Montgomery Specific Plan DiagramlChula Vista General Plan.
The Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that the Negative Declaration IS-92-39,
prepared on June 1, 1992, is appropriate for the proposed project.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council:
1. Find that adoption of GPA-92-Q1 and rezone PCZ-92-B will have no significant
environmental impact and adopt the Negative Declaration IS-92-39 issued.
2.
Adopt the Montgomery Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment GPA-92-Q1 and rezone
PCZ-92-B.
~~-/
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION:
Paae 2, Item J ~ ?
~PH;nl Date~ """"
jI-0;J
1. The Resource Conservation Commission at its meeting of November 9, 1992, voted on
a motion to recommend approval of Negative Declaration IS-92-39, Margarita Romero,
to include the following comment: "a Phase I Hazardous Waste Assessment be
reviewed." Motion failed 3-0-1; McNair abstained, noting that the abstention should not
be interpreted as lack of support, but that as a new member receiving her packet on the
day of the meeting, she was unable to adequately review the documents presented.
2. The Montgomery Planning Committee considered GPA-92-o1 and rezone PCZ-92-B at
its public hearing of November 11, 1992. The Committee approved GPA-92-o1 and
rezone PCZ-92-B by a 4-0 vote and recommended that it be adopted by the City Planning
Commission and City Council.
3. The City Planning Commission, at its meeting of November 12, 1992, by vote of 5-0,
recommended that the City Council adopt GPA-92-ollPCZ-92-B.
DISCUSSION:
1.
The subject property consists of a parcel of land which is located in the southwesterly
quadrant of West Main Street and Del Monte Avenue.
.......
2. Existing General PlanlMontgomery Specific Plan designations (please see Exhibit A).
North:
South:
East:
West:
Research & Limited Industrial
Low/Medium Density Residential
Low/Medium Density Residential
Research & Limited Industrial
3. Adjacent Zoning and Land Use (please see Exhibit B).
North:
South:
East:
West:
I-L-P
R-I-6-P
R-I-6-P
I-L-P
Industrial
Single-family dwellings
Single-family dwellings
Industrial
4. The subject site is presently a legal non-conforming use. The project area is presently
used for storage purposes.
This property is located at the southwesterly quadrant of Main Street and Del Monte
Avenue, and is not an integral part of the single-family area to the east. The adjacent
uses consist of an auto salvage/storage business at the southern boundary of the property ""'"
~~...,)..
.
.
.
Paae 3, Item ~ (,
Meeting Dat~ JI~ J
and a single-family residential subdivision to the immediate east. To the north is an
auto sales establishment, while an industrial storage yard lies to the west. The site is not
suitable for single-family residential development.
5. The land to the east of the proposed project site is a single-family subdivision, better
known as Whitington's Subdivision No. 10. This area's single-family character is subject
to the impacts of adjacent non-residential uses, and should be protected through the
establishment of a Precise Development Plan as well as the application of Design Review
Procedures. Please see Attachment A for the proposed design review standards to be
applied to this property.
CONCLUSION
The proposed Montgomery Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment would not adversely affect
the single-family dwelling fabric, provided the recommendations, as outlined elsewhere in this
report, are part and parcel of the overall amendment and rezoning.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
(apa92-llI..I13)"
~~~;J
~
,
nus PAGE BlANK
~.
""""
~ 6-(
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT A
PAGE A
PRECISE PLAN FINDINGS
Pursuant to Section 19.56.041 of the Zoning Ordinance, the following circumstance is evident
which allows application of the .p. Precise Plan modifying district to this site.
The property or area to which the P modifying district is applied is an area adjacent and
contiguous to a zone allowing different land uses, and the development of a precise plan will
allow the area so designated to coexist between land usages which might otherwise prove
incompatible.
This circumstance applies to this property, due to the adjacent residentially designated and zoned
areas to the south and east of the project site.
~ &''''1
ATIACHMENT A
PAGE B
.-.,
.p. DISTRICT REGULATIONS FOR
PRECISE PLAN MODIFIER
In order to effectuate the implementation of the proposed rezoning (I-L-P) the following
constitute the district regulations and design standards and guidelines shall be adhered to by any
Precise Plan submiued to develop the property.
Design Standards and Guidelines:
· Building heights, placement and color of structures shall compliment existing neighboring
structures.
· Service entries and loading areas shall be shielded from public view and adjacent
residential areas by being placed towards the rear and non-public view sides of the
building.
· Entry into the property from Del Monte Avenue shall be located at the northerly end of
the parcel so as to minimize friction between residential and industrial traffic.
· Glare to surrounding residential areas shall be minimized through use of directional
lighting for illumination of parking and loading areas.
· A solid masonry minimum 6 ft. high wall shall be constructed along the interior and rear
property lines.
.-."
· Fencing design shall reflect the building architecture in materials and articulation.
· Signage review shall be integrated into the overall site and architectural design process
in order to coordinate signage design with the building architectural style, colors,
materials and landscaping.
· All roof-top mechanical equipment shall be screened or otherwise kept from public view.
Screening and shield c;lements shall be integrated within the overall building design.
· Service, utility, trash collection and parking lot areas shall be screened from view (public
streets, parking areas, pedestrian walks, etc.) by permanent walls and landscaping.
Screening walls and landscaping shall be integrated with respect to forms and materials
with the surrounding architecture and architecture of the main building.
· The area between the wall and the edge of the sidewalk shall be permanently larwIocaped.
Such landscaped area shall be provided with an automatic irrigation system and shall be
permanently maintained and kept free of debris.
-....
~~-r
.
.
.
ATIACHMENT A
PAGE C
. The Zoning Administrator could require construction of a 6-foot high decorative masonry
wall across the entire frontage width of the parcel, if deemed necessary, for visual
screening and noise attenuation purposes. The use of buildings near the parcel frontage
may eliminate some of the need for front fencing.
Said wall should be constructed at a minimum of 20 feet behind the front property line.
. All mitigation measures identified in the Negative Declaration (IS-92-42) must be
complied with.
fIpa92.ol.pc)
?'/ ~-7
l
W
I
L
A
CITY
CITY
--
- +---..
I
I
-
l.OW IMEDIUM RES. (a-e lIIl/ac)
..EDIUM DENSITY RES. (e-11 ""/ac)
RETAIL COMMERCIAL
RESEARCH/L..ITED INDUST.
.PARKS a OP.EN SPACE
GPA-92-0 1
- .
~EXHIBIT A
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS
..
-
Imm
FZ2J
1m
-
1tROPOSAL: CHANGE FROM LOW IIIEDIUM
RESDENTIAL DENSITY TO RESEARCH
a LIMITED ..DUSTRIAL
t~
I
o
f'EET
.c,.
PUBLIC a QUAS. PUBLIC
~~-/t?
CITV OF CHULA VISTA PLA....ING DEPARTMENT-ADV. DIY.
""-82 C.Co..arrvbla.
~rT I !:: : rTITTI rm~[]]]]]]]]~ 8
TREMONT STR ET .. .
fi ~ I t ~ iT~ITTTTT11TT1 ;:~\6::}'t~
LJJ...LJJJ.l..L ,:' 'j'~'OTAY
,- e t:,. II IN.- "1R5t DTIJI[[]]~~.:;:~5S~~J
i~[]J[][J]J]) c
I~ I I ~BIJIllIIIIII]
STREET <:IL
ITll1 T
III II
MONTGOMERY ?'T
~llli I I 01 1
If> a::
~ r-h lJ~l .
ZENITH _
WJ
....L
I-
1t
-r
STREET
lUB J ,.... I" \\ J "-
ANCURZA
~. ..;- ~
.............. AL.V WAY
- ....
I
JIl
I--
(ILP)
- '- -~ -
~
(ILP )
f-
\
I
:--- ---- I
---~
! ~-7~
""TY InF L.A
.. · m'T" - 0'" - - SAN -, "'iIi G
',..---- -
.'c-- -
..1" ._u._..
..A-70 _ .. ...AGRICULIURALZONE
&1-6-1' SINGLE FAMILY PRECISE PLoAN UcWliOOOel)
"'1-+f' S..aL.E FAMIL.Y PRECISE PL.AN (1cWlIOOOtIl)
R-2-P TWO FAML Y PRECISE PLAN
MHP MOBILE HOME PARK
CCP CENTRAL COMM. PRECISE PL.AN
L
LP
&.IMITED INUSTRIAL
l.N1TED JND. PRECISE PLAN
flROPOSAL: . CHANGE R-1-8-P
_ _ . .,-0 UlITE~ ..DUSTftIAL .
---
~XHIBIT B
t
.~O'
1
o
"EET
PCZ-92-B
EXISTING ZONING AND
LAND USE DESIGNATIONS
~ /, --II
CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTUENT-ADV.DIV. .-'-82 C.Covanullllla
.
")
.,
1HIS PAGE BlANK
'"""
~
~ ~-/;2...
.
.
.
COUNCil.. AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
7
2~1
Meeting Date
ITEM TITLE:
Public Hearing: GPA-93-Q3 and PCZ-93-C; Proposal to amend the Chula
Vista General Plan/Montgomery Specific Plan and rezone approximately
13.48 acres located on the eastern portion of Broadway, between Main
Street on the south and Anita Street on the north; Subareas 1 &. 2 from
"Research and Limited Industrial" and -I-L-P- to -Retail Commercial" /
"Mercantile &. Office Commercial" and "C-C-P"; Subarea 3 from
"Research and Limited Industrial" and "I-L-P" to -Medium Density
Residential" and "R-2-P."
[J Resolution / t. 9 J r Approving Montgom~\I,)~pecific
. Plan/General Plan Amendment GPA-93-Q3 I,) t"'-'
~"
\,,>J<
,q Ordinance e:25':J ~ Adoptin1\<._-93-C
/ .,jJ\",V
J$1t
SUBMITTED BY:
Director of Planning
City Manager ('
(4/Sths Vote: Yes_NoX)
REVIEWED BY:
The subject request is an application for the redesignation and rezoning of 13.48 acres, amending
the Chula Vista General Plan/Montgomery Specific Plan. The three areas in question are listed
below:
a. Abode Plaza (Sepehri property privately initiated) 4.56 acre area located on the
northeasterly quadrant of West Main and Broadway (Subarea 1), and;
b. East Sommerset (City initiated) 4.00 acre area located on the southeasterly quadrant of
West Anita and Broadway (Subarea 2);
from -Research &. Limited Manufacturing" to -Retail Commercial- on the Chula Vista
General Plan Land Use Map and from ,-Research &. Limited Industrial" to -Mercantile
&. Office Commercial" on the plan diagram of the Montgomery Specific Plan.
Consideration will also be given to an application to rezone the Subareas 1 and 2 from
"I-L-P Limited Industrial" to "C-C-P Central Commercial" with a -P" Modifier (please
see Exhibits A &. B).
c.
Property south of Anita Street with 4.92 acre area, located at the northeast boundary and
adjacent to the southeasterly quadrant of West Anita Street and Broadway (Subarea 3);
..J>'1" 7- I
Page 2, Item _ /7' 7
M-1111 Date~ ~ ~
from "Research & Limited Manufacturing" to "Medium Density Residential" on the )
Chula Vista General Plan Land Use Map and from "Research & Limited Industrial" to
"Me4ium Density Residential" on the plan diagram of the Montgomery Specific Plan.
Consideration will also be given to an application in this instance to rezone Subarea 3
from "I-L-P Limited Industrial" to "R-2-P one and two-family residence zone" with a
"P" modifier (please see Exhibits A & B).
The General Plan Amendment, Specific Plan Amendment, and rezone for Subarea I is proposed
in order to allow development of a retail commercial center. The General Plan Amendment,
Specific Plan Amendment, and rezoning for Subareas 2 and 3 would be consistent with existin~
ll&.$. and no new development is proposed for these areas at this time.
The Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that the Mitigated Negative Declaration
15-92-42, prepared on August 26, 1992, constitutes adequate prior review of the proposal.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council:
1. Find that adoption of GPA-93-03 and rezone PCZ-93-C will have no significant
environmental impact and adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration IS-92-42 issued.
2. Adopt the Montgomery 5pecific Plan/General Plan Amendment GPA-93-03 and rezone
PCZ-93-C.
""'\
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION:
I. The Resource Conservation Commission at its meeting of November 9, 1992, voted on
a motion to recommend approval of Negative Declaration 15-92-42 Abode Plaza; motion
failed 3-0-1; McNair abstained, noting that the absention should not be interpreted as lack
of support, but that as a new member receiving her packet on the day of the meeting, she
was unable to adequately review the documents presented.
2. The Montgomery Planning Committee at its public hearing of November 11, 1992,
recommended adoption of Negative DeclaratiQl1 15-92-42 Abode Plaza et al; motion failed
3-1; Scheurr abstained. No further action was taken on GPA-93-03/PCZ-93-C.
3. The City Planning Commission, at its ~eeting of November 12, 1992, by vote of 5-0,
recommended that the City Council adopt GPA-93-03/PCZ-93-C.
DISCUSSION:
1.
The subject land is designated "Research and Limited Industrial" on the plan diagram of
the Montgomery Specific Plan and Chula Vista General Plan.
""'"
PkZ ?~,,2..
Item 7
Revised 1-5-93
ORDINANCE NO. 2539 t>~
-#
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA~ST ~ING THE
ZONING MAP OR MAPS ESTABLISHED BY S 19.18.010 OF THE
CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE REZONING ACRES LOCATED ON
THE EAST SIDE OF BROADWAY, NO~F MAIN STREET, AND
SOUTH OF ANITA STREET, FROM 1- TO C-C-P AND R-2-P AND
ADOPTING P DISTRICT REGULATION
WHEREAS, a duly verified application for a rezoning was filed with the Planning
Department of the City of Chula Vista on September 4, 1992 by Sam Sepehri; and
WHEREAS, said applications requested that approximately 4.56 acres located on the east
side of Broadway north of Main Street and south of Anita Street("Subarea 1 ") be rezoned from
I-L-P (Limited Industrial with Precise Plan Modifier) to C-C-P (Central Commercial with
Precise Plan Modifier); and
WHEREAS, upon analysis of the proposed project, the Planning Department, in order
to provide for a sound land use plan. for the area, initiated an expansion of the proposed rezone
to an additional 8.92 acres located north and northwest of Subarea 1; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Department divided the expansion area into two areas, one
consisting of 4.0 acres located on the southwest quadrant of Broadway and Anita Street
("Subarea 2"), and one consisting of 4.92 acres located on the south side of Anita Street
immediately east of Subarea 2 ("Subarea 3"); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on November 12, 1992, and
voted 5 to 0 to recommend that the City Council approve rezone; and
WHEREAS, on December 2, 1992, at the request of a property owner, the Planning
Commission reconsidered the proposed zoning ordinance amendments to a portion of Subarea
3 and voted 5 to 0 to reaffirm their previous decision to recommend rezoning of Subarea 3 to
R-2-P; and
WHEREAS, the City Council set the time and place for a hearing on said rezone
application and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication
in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and its mailing to property owners within 1000
feet of the exterior boundaries of the Property at least ten days prior to the hearing in accordance
with Government Code Sections 65358,65090 and 65091 (a) 1 and 2 and Chula Vista Municipal
Code Section 19.12.070; and
and
WHEREAS, an Initial Study (Case No. 92-42) was prepared for the proposed project;
~J~ ~..'"
~'1'6
7--/
.
.
.
.
Page 3, Item ~
Meeting Date ~
?
r~J
2. Existing General Plan/Montgomery Specific Plan Designations (please see Exhibit A).
North:
South:
East:
West:
High Density Residential
Research & Limited Industrial
Research & Limited Industrial
Mercantile/Office Commercial
3. Adjacent Zoning (please see Exhibit B).
North:
South:
East:
West:
R-3-P Multiple Family Residential
I-L-P Limited Industrial
I-L-P Limited Industrial
C-T-P Thoroughfare Commercial
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
The Environmental Review Coordinator conducted an Initial Study, IS-92-42, of potential
environmental impacts associated with the implementation of the project. Based on the attached
Initial Study and comments thereof, any environmental impacts would be reduced to a level of
insignificance through mitigation measures as may be proposed and appropriate. Therefore, the
Environmental Coordinator has concluded that there would be no significant environmental
impacts, and recommends adoj)tion of the Neiative Declaration issued on IS-92-42.
ANALYSIS
Subarea 1
Subarea 1 is the 4.56 acre parcel which has been proposed for a change in General Plan and
zoning by the owner in order to allow for the construction of a retail commercial center. The
present General Plan designation and zoning is Limited Industrial; however, the site currently
contains a trailer park (being closed), several small used auto sales businesses, and a small sheet
metal shop. The proposed change to a commercial plan designation and zone is recommended
by staff for the following reasons:
1. The proposed use is compatible with commercial uses on the west side of Broadway,
both north and south of Main Street, and is compatible with mixed commercial and light
industrial uses on the east side of Broadway, both north and south of Main Street.
2. The proposed project site, located at the comer of Broadway and Main, is suited for
commercial uses due to its location adjacent to both of these prominent thoroughfares.
~...J
?"J
. 7
~'::.~ Ik'
/~'J
3. The proposed commercial use of this prope..ty would allow for new and attractive
development, built in conformance with Chula Vista design guidelines, in place of the
existing marginal and deteriorated uses on the site.
Subarea 2
Subarea 2 is a 4.0 acre parcel containing the three-year-old Sommerset Commercial Center.
This Center was approved by the issuance of a conditional use permit in the existing Limited-
Industrial zone classification which the Illup<aty is designated. However, the same rationale for
redesignation and rezoning Subarea 1 to Commercial applies to this property as well, given its
location. Additionally, administration of the conditions of the conditional use permit, which
restricts users to those allowed in the Limited Industrial zone classification, is cumbersome, and
serves no strong positive purpose, given the site's suitability for less restrictive retail commercial
purposes.
Subarea 3
Subarea 3 consists of 4.92 acres fronting on Anita Street. Existing uses include five single-
family residences, the Farm House Trailer Park, a small motel, and a small portion of the
Granada Mobile Estates Park. Despite the existing uses, this area is designated and zoned for
Limited Industrial development. Redesignation and rezoning of Subareas 1 and 2 to Commercial
would result in this area remaining an isolated pocket of industrially designated land surrounded
by commercial uses to the west and south and residential uses to the north and east.
Commercial uses on this property (other than the existing small 40-year-old motel) are
inappropriate given the lack of frontage on a circulation element street. Therefore, staff
recommends that this area be redesignated to Medium Residential (6-11 dulac), in conformance
with the adjacent residential area to the west of Subarea 3, and rezoned to R-2-P (One and Two-
Family Residential).
While the owners of the eastern half of this subarea (Granada Mobile Estates and three smaller
properties) have assented to the change in land use category, the owner of the Farm House
Trailer Park and Motel objects to the change, primarily because he believes that his propeJtj is
unsuitable for future residential use due to the impacts of the adjacent Sommerset Commercial
Center to the west. In response, staff believes that many of the problems related to the interface
between residential and commercial uses can be resolved through prOJ'<'l site planning and
environmental review if and when the Farm House property is redeveloped. Also, the owner
has been directed to discuss existing zoning enforcement problems related to excessive noise
coming from the Sommerset Commercial Center with the Code Enforcement Division of the
Building & Housing Department.
~.
The Chula Vista Elementary School District, in a letter dated October 16, 1992, has requested
that action on Subarea 3 be either deferred until the City and School District have agreed on a '"""
./Jl-~T ?...y
.
.
.
Pqe 5, Item ~ 7
M.....I~I Date pwm 14'J
school impact mitigation ordinance, or conditioned to require participation in a Mello-Roos
financing or other alternative financing mechanism to fully mitigate school impacts. Staff does
not believe that action on Subarea 3 should be deferred or conditioned as requested by the school
district because most of this area consists of existing residential uses which include five single-
family residences and 38 trailerslmobilehomes. Staff estimates that maximum additional buildout
of this area, if the lots containing single-family homes were redeveloped at densities allowed by
the Medium Residential (6-11 dulac.) plan category, would be 10 units. The lots containing the
trailerslmobilehomes are already built to maximum residential density allowed in the Medium
Residential plan category. This would result in an additional three elementary students. Based
upon the most recent enrollment figures at Montgomery and Otay Elementary Schools available
to the City, these two schools can accommodate three additional students.
CONCLUSION
The proposed Montgomery Specific Plan/General Plan Amendment would not adversely affect
the development of the Montgomery Community, provided the recommendations, as outlined
elsewhere in this report, are made part of the overall amendment and rezoning.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
(OPA93-OO.AI\3)
~?-5
--..
"
TInS PAGE BlANK.
~
........
~7'~
.
WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator recommends the adoption of a
Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program for the proposed project;
and
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely 6:00 P.M.,
December 15, 1992 in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the City Council and
said hearing was thereafter closed.
NOW, THEREFORE the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby find,
determine and ordain as follows:
SECTION I: Envir,lnmental
The City Council finds that the project would have no significant environmental impacts
and adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program issued on IS
92-42.
SECTION II: Findings
A. The City Council finds that the rezoning of Subareas 1 and 2 is consistent with
the City of Chula Vista General Plan as amended concurrently with this action
and that the public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning
practice support the rezoning to 1- L- P.
B. The City C;:;uncil finds that, pursuant to Section 19.56.041 of the Zoning
Ordinance, following circumstance is evident which allows application of the .p"
Precise Plan modifying district to this site:
The property or area to which the P modifying district is applied is an area
adjacent and contiguous to a zone allowing different land uses, and the
development of a precise plan will allow the area so designated to coexist between
land usages which might otherwise prove incompatible.
SECTION III: Rezoning
Section 19.18.010 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code (being the zoning map) is hereby
amended to rezone' the Property as follows:
Subarea 1: From I-L-P (Limited Industria1 with Precise Plan Modifier) to C-C-P (Central
Commercial with Precise Plan Modifier).
Subarea 2: From I-L-P (Limited Industria1 with Precise Plan Modifier) to C-C-P (Central
Commercial with Precise Plan Modifier).
?~ V
For all two subareas, the P Modifier District Regulations attached hereto under
Attachment A is hereby adopted.
SECTION IV: This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force on the thirtieth day
from and after its adoption.
Presented by
Robert A. Leiter
Director of Planning
F:_Idoo>ey\pcz93C
7~7
as to form
A
Bruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
.
.
.
A'ITACHMENT A
PAGE A
PRECISE PLAN FINDINGS
Pursuant to Section 19.56.041 of the Zoning Ordinance, the following circumstances are evident
which allow application of the .p. Precise Plan modifying district to this site.
The subject property, or the neighborhood or area in which the j)ioperty is located, is unique
by virtue of topography, geological characteristics, access, configuration, traffic circulation, or
some social or historic situation requiring special handling of the development on a precise plan
basis.
The subject property is located in the middle of the Montgomery Community which
operates under zoning regulations which require design review approval for all new
commercial projects. The development should reflect that same requirement.
The property or area to which the .p. modifying district may be applied is an area adjacent and
contiguous to a zone allowing different land uses and the development of a precise plan will
allow the area so designated to coexist between land uses which might otherwise be
incompatible.
The three subareas are all adjacent to zones which allow differing land uses, and the
Precise Plan designation would serve to buffer potential land use conflicts.
.19 7 7~/1
ATIACHMENT A
PAGE B
.........
P DISTRICT REGULATIONS
FOR
PRECISE PLAN
In order to effectuate the implementation of the proposed rezoning (C-C-P) the following
constitute the District Regulations and design standards and guidelines which shall be adhered
to for any Precise Plan for development of the property.
Design Standards and Guidelines:
· All mitigation measures identified in the Negative Declaration (IS 92-42) must be
complied with.
· The project shall show compatiblity with adjacent uses through the use of landscaping,
building design, fencing, and other measures as necessary.
.........
.........
~ 7'l~
-
I
I'
~
I
I
: W H I
LOW/MEDIUM REB. (!HI ./ac)
MEDIUM REB. (8-11 "'ac)
MED/HIGH REB. (11-1. "'.c)
HIGH REB. ('18-27 ./ac)
-
=
f'Z2]
~
~
GPA-93-03
. EXHIBIT A
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS
&I
Ii
MERCANTILE/OFFICE COMM.
THOROUGHFARE COMM.
....ITED ..DUBTRIAL
OPEN SPACE
. PROPOSAL: CHANGE FROM
LIMITED INDUSTRIAL TO COMMERCIAL AND RESIDENTIAL ~
. )9 2: 7" /J FEET
CIT.,. OF .CHUI.A VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT-ADV. DIY. UHf.... C.CO ~ItRU81A8. .~_..
t
..&0.
MHP
11-3
- -- ~,
,
.--_...
ILP
,
:'
, '
, ,
:'
"
, ,
r-.J I
, ,
, ,
,
,
'"
'"
:::;
(,,----
CTP
.-~ --,
,
,
[j
ILP
I'
~
I
894
"'HP
r.. 3A
,
I
I
--
I
PROJECT
:AREA
ILP
I
i
'"'
en
j:
...
\
,
,
,
,
,
t -- - - --
J
I
-.------------- ---
EXISTING ZONING DESIGNATIONS
41-3 MUL TI-FAMIL Y RES.
R-3-P -MULTI-FAMLlY- RES. PRECISE PLAN
- MHP MOBILE HOME PARK
CTP THOROUGHFARE COMM.. PRECIBE PLAN
tLP LIMITED INDUSTRIAL PRECISE PLAN
.... OPEN BPACE - ./ 9 -/6' 7-/. 0 EET
CITTOF CHULA VIBTA PLA~NING DEPARTMENT-ADV. DIY. JO-1l7-e2 c.coVAMuaIAS 'I
R-2-P
TWO FAMu.:y PRECISE PLAtt
PCZ-93-C
PROPOSAL: CHANGE FROM LIMITED
;..DUSTRIAL TO CENTRAL
-COMMERCIAL AND
RESIDENTIAL. .
EXHIBIT>-B
t'1
.AO'
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item L
Meeting Date 01/05/93
ITEM TITLE: Resolution 11,.'1./1/ Approving a Modification to the Agreement
between the City of Chula Vista and Lettieri-McIntyre & Associates,
(Mary May) and the Baldwin Vista Associates for Professional Services
to Assist the Otay Ranch Team General Manager, and Authorizing the
Mayor to Execute the Agreement
SUBMlTIED BY: Deputy City Manager Krempl & t
REVIEWED BY: City Managerf (4/5th Vote: Yes_No X)
The attached Agreement modification for project management and planning services with
Lettieri-McIntyre & Associates and Baldwin Vista Associates is for continuation of
temporary planning assistance. This request is a continuation of the same contract previously
approved by the City Council. The assistance focuses on processing of the General
Development Plan and related documents for the approximately 23,000-acre Otay Ranch
Project. The Agreement has the concurrence of both the City of Chula Vista staff and San
Diego County staff. This item was carried over from the December 15, 1992 Council
meeting to further review work items with the applicant.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the attached Agreement modification and
authorize the Mayor to sign on behalf of the City Council.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION: In March of this year, the Council approved a budget of $20,000.00 through
June 30, 1992 for planning assistance to the General Manager to complete certain tasks
listed in Exhibit A. That contract was extended through September 30, 1992 and then
through December 31, 1992. Those tasks are proceeding and joint workshops on this project
at the City Council/Board of Supervisors level began in late July 1992. Public hearings at
the Planning Commission level will begin in December, 1992 and continue into January,
1993. The purpose of this modification is to continue the assistance at the same level
through April 30, 1993 or an additional four months.
Attached is a proposed scope-of-work, schedule and costs of the above tasks (Exhibit A).
To continue to respond to that schedule, this request is being made that will assign one
Lettieri-Mcintyre & Associates staff person (Mary May) to assist in coordination of such
projects as the Planning Commission referrals and the Public Participation Program,
including public hearing notice coordination and assistance during public hearings. Ms. May
~"I
\lA
Page 2, Item r'
Meeting Date 01/05/93
has City and County experience having worked for the County as a planner and the City of
Chula Vista on Rancho del Rey and EastLake SPAs. The monthly rate for Ms. May is
$55.00 per hour not to exceed $2,000.00 per month. This represents the current level of
service needed even though the City Council approved $5,000.00 per month in September,
1992. Therefore, this is in essence a reduction of $3,000.00 per month from the current level
of support service being provided. For Council information, we would also note that Lettieri-
McIntyre & Associates received $285,537.47 in FY 91-92 and $140,231.55 to date in FY 92-
93 which included not only work on Otay Ranch, but work for the City on EastLake Kaiser
EIR, Palomar Trolley Center and some work on RDR SPA III.
For the above reasons, and with the acknowledgement that Baldwin Vista will continue to
deposit funds to reimburse the City in full, it is appropriate to approve this Agreement
modification.
FISCAL IMPACT: All costs will be paid to the City by the applicant. This amendment
extends the time of the contract through April 30, 1993.
Attachments
memos#4:\marymay.113
g",~
RESOLUTION NO.
I~ e;'I'I
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING A MODIFICATION TO THE
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND
LETTIERI-McINTYRE & ASSOCIATES, (MARY MAY) AND
THE BALDWIN VISTA ASSOCIATES FOR PROFESSIONAL
SERVICES TO ASSIST THE OTAY RANCH TEAM GENERAL
MANAGER, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE
THE AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, a modification of the Agreement between the city
of Chula vista and Lettieri-McIntyre & Associates and Baldwin vista
Associates for project management and planning services for
continuation of temporary planning assistance is needed; and
WHEREAS, there is no change from the current level of
support service being provided; and
WHEREAS, the assistance will focus on processing of the
General Development Plan and related documents for the
approximately 23,ooo-acre Otay Ranch Project; and
WHEREAS, said Agreement has the concurrence of both the
city of Chula vista and San Diego county staff as well as the
applicant.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city Council of
the city of Chula vista does hereby approve a Modification to the
Agreement between the city of Chula vista and Lettieri-McIntyre &
Associates (Mary May) and the Baldwin vista Associates for
Professional Services to assist the Otay Ranch Team General
Manager, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City
Clerk.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of
Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said
Agreement for and on behalf of the city of Chula vista.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
George Krempl, Deputy City
Manager
F:bome\attomey\marymay
1'-3/8-1-
.
.
.
CONlRACT FOR ASSISTANT SERVICES FOR
GENERAL MANAGER OF TIlE OTA Y RANCH PROJECT
THIS AGREEMENT, dated this day of January, 1993 for the purpose of
reference only and effective as of the date last executed by the parties hereto, is between
the CITY OF CHULA VISTA, a Chartered municipal corporation ("City"), BALDWIN
VISTA ASSOCIATES, a California limited partnership ("Applicant") and LETTIERI-
McINTYRE & ASSOCIATES, INC. ("Consultant"), and is made with reference to the
following facts:
WHEREAS, City, Applicant and Consultant entered into an agreement dated
October 8, 1991 by which Baldwin agreed to pay for and Consultant agreed to provide to
the City general management services over the Otay Ranch Project in the person of
Anthony J. Lettieri ("General Management Services Agreement"); and
WHEREAS, the parties desire that the General Management Services are to be
augmented by an assistant to the person of Anthony J. Lettieri, the cost of which will be
paid for by Applicant.
NOW, TIlEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1.
Consultant agrees to retain and assign to the Otay Ranch Project the person of Mary
May and shall require Ms. May to assist General Manager Lettieri from the effective
date of this Agreement until April 30, 1993 in the following areas:
a. Provide project coordination services to include public agency and Applicant
contacts, critical path/flow chart preparation on a weekly basis and monthly
assignment sheets for each working group assigned to the Otay Ranch Project.
b. Assist General Manager Lettieri in the preparation for scheduling and
coordination of the Public Participation Program, including all work
associated with community planning groups, joint Planning Commission
workshops, Montgomery Planning Committee and other public presentations.
c. Assist General Manager Lettieri on the Sphere of Influence Study.
d. Perform such other duties as are assigned to her by General Manager Lettieri
to ensure the timely completion of the project.
2.
Applicant agrees to compensate Consultant for the costs of retaining Ms. May at the
rate of $55.00 per hour not to exceed $12,000.00, not to exceed $2,000.00 in any
month, which compensation shall only be payable by City from the Otay Ranch Trust
Fund, and shall not be an obligation of the General Fund.
8",..5'
.
.
3.
All other rights, duties and obligations of the parties to the General management
Services Agreement shall remain in full force and effect except as may be specifically
augmented by this Agreement, except that this Agreement may be canceled upon 10
days notice.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
LETTIERI-McINTYRE & ASSOCIATES
By:
Tim Nader, Mayor.
By:
Anthony J. Lettieri
By:
City Clerk
BALDWIN VISTA ASSOCIATES, L.P.
A CA Limited Partnership
By: Baldwin Builders, a CA
Corporation, General Partner
ATTEST
APPROVED AS TO FORM
By:
Gregory T. Smith, President
. By:
Bruce M. Boogaard,
City Attorney
sr:\marymay.con
.
fr' ,. ~
"'
.
EXHIBIT "A"
SCOPE-OF- WORK
Lettieri-McIntyre & Associates (Ms. Mary May) will assist the General Manager in the
following areas:
a) Assist in providing response to Planning Commission inquiries as generated from
workshops and public hearings.
b) Providing project coordination services to include public agency and applicant
contacts and critical path/flow chart preparation.
c) Assistance in the preparation for scheduling, coordination and noticing of the Public
Participation Program, including all work associated with community planning groups,
joint Planning Commission and Board of Supervisors/City Council workshops and
other public presentations.
d) Other duties as assigned by the General Manager to ensure the timely completion
of the project.
. SCHEDULE
The duration of this contract is four months, ending April 30, 1993.
COSTS
The above services are to be provided on an hourly basis not to exceed $12,000.00. The
hourly rate is $55.00.
.
sr:\sow.ajl
g''' 7
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
((
Meeting Date 01/05/93
VIA:
Resolution 1/#' '1>Agreement Between the City of Chula Vista,
JHK & Associates and Baldwin Vista, Ltd.
Deputy City Manager Krempl CP
General Manager, Otay Ranch project-rv
City Manager 1 (4/5th Vote: Yes
No
x )
ITEM TIlLE:
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
The City of Chula Vista is the agency designated to approve consulting contracts for the
Otay Ranch Project. JHK & Associates has continued to provide transportation consulting
services on the project. JHK also has extensive experience on projects in the City and
subregion and was originally selected to provide technical input when this project first
commenced in August, 1989. This is anticipated to be the final extension for services for
the Otay Ranch Project. The Agreement has the concurrence of both the City of Chula
Vista staff and San Diego County staff, and the applicant.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the attached Agreement with JHK &
Associates including the attached scope-of-work and authorize the Mayor to sign to sign.
BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION: Contracts for consulting on the Otay Ranch Project
are processed through the City of Chula Vista. Following is the scope-of-work for JHK &
Associates. This has been agreed to by the consultants, applicant, the City of Chula Vista
and staff of the County of San Diego. The original scope-of-work and first four addenda
were provided as a subcontract to RBF & Associates, the planning consultant on the project.
In October of 1992, the City Council approved the seventh addendum as an agreement
solely with JHK & Associates. This agreement represents the eighth addendum and is
programmed to complete work through April, 1993.
This Agreement scope-of-work includes the following:
Task 1 - Prepare For and Attend Community/Local PJ3nning Group Meetings (8)
JHK & Associates will prepare for and attend up to eight Community and
Local Planning Group Meetings (at 6 hours each) or $3,600.00. The focus of
these meetings will be to assist in the final review and approval process for the
9,,')
Page 2, Item 9
Meeting Date 01/05/93
Otay Ranch EIR.
Task 2 - Respond to Directives Received from the Otay Ranch General Manager
JHK & Associates will respond to directives and prepare technical analyses up
to 60 hours or at a cost not to exceed $4,500.00 at the request of the Project
Team through the Otay Ranch General Manager.
Task 3 - Prepare for and Attend Project Related Workshops and Hearings (8)
JHK & Associates will prepare for and attend up to eight Project Related
Workshops and Hearings (at 6 hours each) or 48 hours not to exceed a cost of
$3,600.00. The focus of these meetings will be to assist in the final review and
approval process of the Otay Ranch EIR and to discuss critical issues.
Task 4 - Project Coordination Meetings
The budget for this phase of the Otay Ranch Planning effort includes staff
hours to allow JHK representation at project coordination meetings to be held
bi-monthly over the four month project schedule. These coordination meetings
will be held with representatives of the Project Team, City/County staff and
Technical Subcommittees. It is estimated that JHK will spend 44 staff hours for
this task or $3,300.00.
The additional compensation to be paid to JHK & Associates for this work is $15,000.00.
Attachment #1 provides a cumulative analysis of the total contract, including previous
amendments.
During Fiscal Year 1990-91, JHK & Associates received $48,558.46 in fees for technical
assistance to the Project Team as approved in the Original Contract and subsequent contract
addenda. During Fiscal Year 1991-92, JHK & Associates received $50,750.00 in fees for
technical assistance to the Project Team as approved in subsequent contract addenda.
During this current Fiscal Year 1992-93, JHK & Associates has received $7,580.00 as
approved in subsequent contract addenda.
FISCAL IMPACf: There will be no fiscal impact to the City of Chula Vista because
Baldwin Vista, Ltd. will be funding the above-stated scope-of-work.
Attachment
824601-12/18
9...0/..
RESOLUTION NO.
1~9'/J
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING AGREEMENT (ADDENDUM #8)
WITH JHK & ASSOCIATES AND BALDWIN VISTA, LTD.
FOR TRANSPORTATION PLANNING SERVICES ON THE
OTAY RANCH, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO
EXECUTE SAME
WHEREAS, the city of Chula vista is the agency designated
to approve consulting contracts for the otay Ranch Project; and,
WHEREAS, JHK & Associates has continued to provide
transportation consulting services on the project; and,
WHEREAS, JHK also has extensive experience on projects in
the city and subregion and was originally selected to provide
technical input when this project first commenced in August, 1989;
and,
WHEREAS, this Agreement is a revised scope-of-work for
JHK & Associates and is anticipted to be the final extension for
services for the Otay Ranch Project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula vista does hereby approve the Agreement (Addendum
#8) with JHK & Associates and Baldwin Vista, Ltd. for Transporta-
tion Planning Services on the Otay Ranch, a copy of which is on
file in the office of the City Clerk.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of
Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said
Agreement for and on behalf of the City of Chula vista.
George Krempl, Deputy City
Manager
as to form by
Presented by
Fritsch, Assistant
Attorney
F:\bome\attomey\jbk.8
9- :31'1--1
AGREEMENT (ADDENDUM #8) WTI1I
llIK & ASSOCIATES, INC.
FOR
lRANSPORTATION PlANNING ON TIlE OTAY RANCH
This Agreement is made this day of January, 1993, for the purposes of
reference only, and effective as of the date last executed between the parties, between the
City of Chula Vista ("City") herein, a municipal corporation of the State of California, and
JHK & Associates, Inc., a professional California development consulting firm ("Consultant")
and Baldwin Vista, Ltd. ("Applicant"), and is made with reference to the following facts:
RECITALS
Whereas, the City of Chula Vista is interested in traffic consultant services to
assist in the planning of the Otay Ranch; and,
Whereas, JHK & Associates, Inc. has extensive experience with large
master-planned communities, the City of Chula Vista and the Otay Ranch; and,
Whereas, Consultant warrants and represents that they are experienced and
staffed in a manner such that they are and can prepare and deliver the services required of
Consultant to City in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City and Consultant do
hereby mutually agree as follows:
1. Consultant's Duties
a. General DutiesjScope-of- Work
Consultant shall attend and respond to questions from commmunity planning
group members relating to the transportation planning approach, respond to directives fron
the General Manager on transportation-related matters, and attend such staff meetings as
may be requested by the General Manager. In performing the services under this
agreement, Consultant shall bill only for the minimum skill level needed to perform the
assignments in a reasonable and competant manner.
- 1 -
9....5"
.
b. Standard of Care
Consultant, in performing any Services under this agreement, whether Defined
Services or Additional Services, shall be performed in a manner consistent with that level
of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing
under similar conditions and in similar locations.
c. Insurance
Consultant represents that it and its agents, staff and consultants employed
by it are protected by worker's compensation insurance and the Consultant has the coverage
under public liability and property damage insurance policies which this Agreement requires
to be demonstrated in the form of a certificate of insurance.
Consultant will provide, prior to the commencement of the services required
under this agreement the following certificates of insurance to the City prior to beginning
work:
Statutory Worker's Compensation coverage plus $1,000,000 Employers liability
coverage.
General and Automobile Liability coverage to $1,000,000 combined single
limit which names City as an additional insured, and which is primary to any policy which
the City may otherwise carry ("primary coverage"), and which treats the employees of the
City in the same manner as members of the general public ("cross-liability coverage").
Errors and Omissions insurance to $250,000, unless Errors and Omissions
coverage is included in the General Liability policy.
All policies shall be issued by a carrier that has a Best's Rating of "A, Class
V", or better, or shall meet with the approval of the City's Risk Manager.
All policies shall provide that same may not be canceled without at least thirty
(30) days written notice to the City.
2. Duties of the City
a. Consultation and Cooperation
City shall regularly consult the Consultant for the purpose of reviewing the
progress of the economic analysis and to provide direction and guidance to accomplish the
analysis.
- 2 -
9,J,
b. Compensation
The compensation to be paid by City to Consultant for all of the work
required herein shall be on a time and materials basis as set forth in the attached Exhibit
"A", but in total amount shall not to exceed $15,000.00, payable monthly not later than 60
days after receipt of a properly documented billing. For said compensation, Consultant
agrees to perform all of the services, provide the analysis and deliver the Work Product
herein required. Compensation for the services performed shall be payable only from funds
placed on deposit by Applicant, and from no other asset or resource of the City, a special
obligation which is not a burden upon, or appropriation from, the General Fund of the City.
c. Reductions in Scope-of-Work
City may from time to time reduce the Scope-of-Work by the Consultant to
be performed under this Agreement. City and Consultant agree to meet in good faith and
confer for the purpose of negotiating a corresponding reduction in the Fee associated with
said reduction.
d. Additional Scope-of-Work
In addition to performing the Defined Services herein set forth, City may
require Consultant to perform additional consulting services related to the General Duties
and Scope-of-Work ("Additional Services"), and upon doing so in writing, Consultant shall
perform same on a time and materials basis at the rates set forth on Exhibit "A". All
compensation for Additional Services shall be paid monthly as billed.
3. Duties of Applicant
Applicant agrees to pay to City all costs of City incurred in the retention of Conultant
under this agreement no later than 15 days after same has been incurred by City
Applicant agrees to make monthly payments in the amount of the monthly
compensation required herein of City to make payments to Consultant.
Applicant agrees that any and all assets deposited with the City in trust for the
purpose of processing Applicant's various entitlement applications may be used to pay
Consultant.
Applicant agrees that all security instruments given to City for the purpose of
securing other financial obligations of Applicant to City may also be used as security for the
financial obligation of Applicant under this Agreement.
- 3 -
9~?
4. Administration of Contract
The City hereby designates the General Manager of the Otay Ranch, or his written
designee, as its representative for the review and administration of the work performed by
Consultant herein required.
5. Term
Consultant shall perform all of the Defined Services herein required of it by not later
than April 30, 1993, and shall attend and respond to community planning group members
related to the transportation planning approach, and otherwise meet other reasonable
deadlines assigned by the General Manager, and be present at such meetings as directed by
the General Manager.
6. Financial Interests of Consultant
Consultant warrants and represents that neither he, nor his immediate family
members, nor his employees or agents ("Consultant Associates") presently have any interest,
directly or indirectly, whatsoever in the property which is the subject matter of the Project,
or in any property within 10 radial miles from the exterior boundaries of the property which
is the subject matter of the Project, of ("Prohibited Interest") except as listed on an
attachment.
Consultant further warrants and represents that no promise of future employment,
remuneration, consideration, gratuity or other reward or gain has been made to Consultant
or Consultant Associates. Consultant promises to advise City of any such promise that may
be made during the Term of this Agreement, or for 12 months thereafter.
Consultant agrees that neither Consultant nor his immediate family members, nor
his employees or agents, shall acquire any such Prohibited Interest within the Term of this
Agreement, or for 12 months after the expiration of this Agreement.
Consultant may not conduct or solicit any business for any party to this Agreement,
or for any third party which may be in conflict with Consultant's responsibilities under this
Agreement.
7. Hold Harmless
Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its elected and
appointed officers and employees, from and against all claims for damages, liability, cost and
expense (including without limitation attorneys' fees) arising out of the conduct of the
Consultant, or any agency or employee, subcontractors, or others in connection with the
execution of the work covered by this Agreement, except only for those claims arising from
- 4 -
9-,~
.
the sole negligence or sole willful conduct of the city, its officers, or employees.
Consultant's indemnification shall include any and all costs, expenses, attorneys' fees and
liability incurred by the City, its officers agents, or employees in defending against such
claims, whether the same proceed to judgment or not. Further, consultant at its own
expense shall upon written request by the City, defend any such suit or action brought
against the City, its officers, agents, or employees. Consultants' indemnification of City shall
not be limited by any prior or subsequent declaration by the Consultant.
8. Termination of Agreement for Cause
If, through any cause, Consultant shall fail to fulfill in a timely and proper manner
his/her obligations under this Agreement, or if Consultant shall violate any of the covenants,
agreements or stipulations of this Agreement, City shall have the right to terminate this
Agreement by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination and specifying the
effective date thereof at least five (5) days before the effective date of such termination.
In that event, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps,
reports and other materials prepared by Consultant shall, at the option of the City, become
the property of the City, and Consultant shall be entitled to receive just and equitable
compensation for any work satisfactorily completed on such documents an other materials
up to the effective date of Notice of Termination, not to exceed the amounts payable
hereunder, and less any damages caused City by Consultant's breach.
9. Errors and Omissions
In the event that the Deputy City Manager determines that the Consultants'
negligence, etltors, or omissions in the performance of work under this Agreement has
resulted in expense to City greater than would have resulted if there were no such
negligence, errors, omissions in the plans or contract specifications, Consultant shall
reimburse City for the additional expenses incurred by the City. Nothing herein is intended
to limit City's rights under other provisions of this agreement.
10. Termination of Agreement for Convenience of City
City may terminate this Agreement at any time and for any reason for giving specific
written notice to Consultant of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof,
at least thirty (30) days before the effective date of such termination. In that event, all
finished and unfinished documents and other materials described herein above shall, at the
option of the City, become City's sole and exclusive property. If the Agreement is
terminated by City as provided in this paragraph, Consultant shall be entitled to receive just
and equitable compensation for any satisfactory work completed on such documents and
other materials to the effective date of such termination. consultant hereby expressly waives
any and all claims for damages or compensation arising under this Agreement except as set
forth herein.
- 5 -
9'fj
11. Assignability
The services of Consultant are personal to the City, and Consultant shall not assign
any interest in this Agreement, and shall not transfer any interest in the same (whether by
assignment or novation), without prior written consent of City which City may unreasonable
deny.
12. All reports, studies, information, data, statistics, forms, designs, plans, procedures,
systems and any other materials or properties produced under this Agreement shall be the
sole and exclusive property of City. No such materials or properties produced in whole or
in part under this Agreement shall be subject to private use, copyrights or patent rights by
consultant in the United States or in any other country without the express written consent
of City. City shall have unrestricted authority to publish, disclose as may be limited by the
provisions of the Public Records Act, distribute, and otherwise use, copyright or patent, in
whole or in part, any such reports, studies, data, statistics, forms or other materials or
properties produced under this Agreement.
13. Independent Contractor
City is interested only in the results obtained and Consultant shall perform as an
independent contractor with sole control of the manner and means of performing the
services required under this Agreement. City maintains the right only to reject or accept
Consultant's work products. Consultant and any of the Consultant's agents, employees or
representatives are, for all purposes under this Agreement, an independent contractor and
shall not be deemed to be an employee of City, and none of them shall be entitled to any
benefits to which City employees are entitled induding but not limited to, overtime,
retirement benefits, workers compensation benefits, injury leave or other leave benefits.
14. Responsible Charge
Consultant hereby designates that Daniel Marum shall be Consultant's representative
("Project Manager") to the project for the duration of the project. No substitution for this
position shall be allowed without written approval from the City.
15. Administrative Claims Requirements and Procedures
No suit or arbitration shall be brought arising out of this agreement, against the City
unless a claim has first been presented in writing and filed with the City of Chula Vista and
acted upon by the City of Chula Vista in accordance with the procedures set forth in
Chapter 1.34 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, as same may from time to time be
amended, the provisions of which are incorporated by this reference as if fully set forth
herein, and such policies and procedures used by the City in the implementation of same.
- 6 -
.
9.../p
,
Upon request by City, Consultant shall meet and confer in good faith with City for
the purpose of resolving any dispute over the terms of this Agreement.
16. Attorney's Fees
Should that dispute result in litigation, it is agreed that the prevailing party shall be
entitled to recover all reasonable costs incurred in the defense of the claim, including costs
and attorney's fees.
17. Statement of Costs
In the event that Consultant prepares a report or document, or participates in the
preparation of a report or document as a result of the scope-of-work required of Consultant,
Consultant shall include, or cause the inclusion, in said report or document a statement of
the numbers and cost in dollar amounts of all contracts and subcontracts relating to the
preparation of the report or document.
- 7 -
9"'//
SIGNATURE PAGE TO
AGREEMENT (ADDENDUM #8) WI1H
JHK & ASSOCIATES, me.
'TRANSPORTATION PLANNING ASSISTANCE ON OTAY RANCH
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Consultant have executed this Agreement
this _ day of January, 1993.
CITY OF CHUlA VISTA
JHK & ASSOCIATES, me.
BY:
BY:
Frank G. Castro
Senior Associate
Tim Nader, Mayor
City of Chula Vista
ArrEST:
BALDWIN VISTA, Ltd.
BY:
BY:
Gregory T. Smith
President
Beverly Authelet
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BY:
Bruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
Attachment
- 8 -
9,/,)..
Exhibit A
Western Consulting Division
Category Rates. July 1, 1992 through June 30, 1993
Emolovee Cate~orv
T&M Rate
Senior Vice President
Associate Vice President
Senior Associate
Project Manager*
Sr Engineer/Sr Planner
Engineer/Planner II**
Engineer/Planner 1**
Designer
Graphics
Drafter/CAD Operator
Secretarial
Traffic Technician/Analyst
Technician/Other Categories
155.00
117.50
98.75
107.00
84.50
70.50
54.00
58.75
44.75
44.75
40.00
35.25
30.50
* "Project Manager" is a mix of Senior Engineers through Officers serving in a project
management role.
** II is used for higher salary levels, I for lower.
9'13
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
ITEM
It)
MEETING DATE
Januarv 5. 1993
SUBMITTED BY: DIRECTOR OF PERSONNEL
REVIEWED BY: CITY MANAGER G'I/ 5[, (4/5ths Vote: Yesl No_)
The City pays for its unemP10ym~~t insurance claims by reimbursement. Each
quarter, the Employment Development Department (E.D.D.) sends an itemized bill
of unemployment insurance benefits paid and the City, after verifying the bill,
reimburses E.D.D. In the past, the estimated annual amount was budgeted in the
Unemployment Insurance Account #100-0700-5234. It was agreed beginning back in
FY 1991-92 to not request the normal budget requirement but rather to appropriate
each quarter from the Unemployment Insurance Trust Fund. This agreement was
reached in an effort to hold the line in the Insurance Budget and utilize Trust
Fund monies specifically set aside to pay unemployment claims.
Resol ution It 'V~mending FY 1992-93 Budget, providing for an
Insurance Trust Fund appropriation to the Unemployment Insurance
Qf;y
ITEM TITLE:
Unemployment
Account.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the reso 1 uti on provi di ng for an
appropriation of $16,489.00 from the Unemployment Insurance Trust Fund.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: N/A
DISCUSSION
During the budget hearings for FY 1992-93, it was agreed that staff would not
request a line item budget for unemployment insurance (Acct. #100-0700-5234) but
would rather request an appropriation from the Unemployment Insurance Trust Fund
each quarter when claims are due and payable. This is the same practice as in
FY 91-92. The Trust Fund has more than $400,000 in reserve, and the interest
earnings to the Fund more than offset the normal budget requirement. As in the
past, excess interest earnings continue to flow back to the General Fund.
FISCAL IMPACT: A total of $16,489.00 is to be appropriated from the
Unemployment Insurance Trust Fund to Unemployment Insurance Account #100-0700-
5234 for the quarter ended September 30, 1992. The sum appropriated to this
account will be expended by authorization and approval of the Finance Director.
A:\(A113)\UNEMPL.INS#6(1I93)
/p--/ II/) "'~
RESOLUTION NO.
It,,,y/,
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AMENDING FY 1992-93 BUDGET,
PROVIDING FOR AN UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE TRUST
FUND APPROPRIATION TO THE UNEMPLOYMENT
INSURANCE ACCOUNT
WHEREAS, the city pays for its unemployment insurance
claims by reimbursing the Economic Development Department
("E.D.D.") for actual losses sustained; and,
WHEREAS, each quarter, the Employment Development
Department sends an itemized bill of unemployment insurance
benefits paid to the City, and the city, after verifying the bill,
reimburses E.D.D.; and,
WHEREAS, the budgeting practice was developed in FY 1991-
92 not to budget the historic requirement but rather to appropriate
each quarter from the Unemployment Insurance Trust Funds as the
actual amount of the claims became known in an effort to hold the
line in the Insurance Budget and utilize Trust Fund monies
specifically set aside to pay unemployment claims,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city council of
the City of Chula vista does hereby amend the FY 1992-93 Budget,
providing for an appropriation of $16,489.00 from the
unappropriated balance in the Unemployment Insurance Trust Fund to
Account #100-0700-5234 for the quarter ended Septem r 30, 1992.
candy Boshell, Director of
Personnel
by
Presented by
~ty
P:\bome\attomey\unemploy
/d- ;J
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item / /
Meeting Date 1/5/93
Resolution I" 9'1? Accepting bids and awarding contract for
Parkway Community Center Reroofing in the City of Chula Vista,
California
Director of Public Works NfV
Director of Parks and Recreaticmlf tr '(
City Manager ~1~5~
ITEM TITLE:
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
(4/5ths Vote: Yes No X )
- -
At 2:00 p.m. on December 2, 1992 in the Public Services Building, the Director of Public
Works received sealed bids for Parkway Community Center reroofing in the City of Chula
Vista, California. The work to be done includes, but is not limited to, building reroofing,
stuccoing and other miscellaneous remodeling items.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council accept bids and award contract to Murray Builders for
the amount of $152,541.00.
BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: N/A
DISCUSSION:
The project was approved in the 1991-92 CIP as a Community Development Block Grant
Project. Therefore, Federal bidding requirements were followed.
The project was advertised for a period of 5 weeks beginning October 24, 1992. During this
period plans were purchased by 42 contractors, and on the bid opening date, bids were
received from 9 contractors.
The bids received are as follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Contractor
Murray Builders, San Diego
Adams Builders, Chula Vista
Clancy Constructors, EI Cajon
Goodleader Contracting, Encinitas
Barban Isber and Sons Inc., San Diego
JBH Contracting, Spring Valley
John Carey Construction Co., San Diego
J. Fife Construction Co., San Diego
St. Thomas Enterprises, Bonita
Bid Amount
$152,541.00
$157,651.00
$164,377.00
$178,187.00
$185,700.00
$187,900.00
$191,500.00
$196,716.00
$210,000.00
1/"'/
Page 2, Item / /
Meeting Date 1/5/93
The low bid is below the budgeted amount by $67,459 or 30.57%. The budgeted amount
was established almost two years ago. At that time, we did not fully predict the tough
bidding climate at the present time. Staff has conducted a background check and past
performance evaluation and determined that Murray Builders has successfully completed
similar projects and has the resources to prosecute this project within schedule and budget.
Staff recommends awarding the contract to Murray Builders in the amount of $152,541.00.
Murray Builders have met the conditions and requirement for minority and women owned
businesses participation. Listed minority subcontractors account for 27.6% of the total
contract and listed women owned business account for 4.7% of the total contract.
Therefore, total Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE) participation in this contract
exceeds the 15% goal established by Council for Federally funded projects.
The Community Development Director has received a copy of this report.
Environmental Status
The City's Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed this project and determined that
it is categorically exempt under section 15301, class 1, of the California Environmental
Quality Act.
FINANCIAL STATEMENT:
FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION
A. Contract Amount $152,541 .00
B. Contingency (approximately 15 %) , 23,459.00
C. Staff Cost (approximately 10%1 14,000.00
TOTAL FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION $190,000.00
FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION
A. Community Development Block Grant
Account PR 112 $243,652.53
TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION $243,652.53
FISCAL IMPACT: Total costs of the project is being provided by Federal Community
Development Block Grant Funds.
SA,JR-064
WPC F:\home\engineer\agendll\mempark.con
I/-~
RESOLUTION NO.
/~9Y7
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING
CONTRACT FOR PARKWAY COMMUNITY CENTER
REROOFING IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA,
CALIFORNIA
WHEREAS, at 2:00 p.m. on December 2, 1992 in the Public
Services Building, the Director of Public Works received the
following nine sealed bids for Parkway Community Center reroofing
in the City of Chula Vista, California:
Contractor
1. Murray Builders, San Diego
2. Adams Builders, Chula vista
3. Clancy Constructors, El Cajon
4. Goodleader Contracting, Encinitas
5. Barban Isber and Sons Inc., San Diego
6. JBH Contracting, Spring Valley
7. John Carey Construction co., San Diego
8. J. Fife construction Co., San Diego
9. st. Thomas Enterprises, Bonita
Bid Amount
$152,541.00
$157,651. 00
$164,377.00
$178,187.00
$185,700.00
$187,900.00
$191,500.00
$196,716.00
$210,000.00
WHEREAS, the low bid by Murray Builders is below the
engineer's estimate of $220,000 by $67,459.00 or by 30.67% and
staff has conducted a background check and past performance
evaluation and determined that Murray Builders has successfully
completed similar projects and has the resources to prosecute this
project within schedule and budget; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends awarding the contract to Murray
Builders in the amount of $152,541.00 in that they have met the
conditions and requirement for minority and women owned businesses
participation; and
WHEREAS, the City's Environmental Review Coordinator has
reviewed this project and determined that it is categorically
exempt under Section 15301, class 1, of the California
Environmental Quality Act.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula vista does hereby accept said nine bids and does
hereby award the contract for Parkway Community Center Reroofing to
Murray Builders in the amount of $152,541.00 to be completed in
accordance with the specifications approved by the Director of
Public Works.
1/' :J
BE
Chula vista
contract for
IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the city of
is hereby authorized and directed to execute said
and on behalf of the city of Chula vista.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
F:\home\attomey\mempark.con
1/,0/
MEMQRANDUM
December 22, 1992
File: JR-064
FROM:
John Goss, City Manager
Bruce Boogaard, City Attorney
Lyman Christopher, Director of Finance
Beverly Authelet, City Clerk
Greg Hanson, Building Services Superintendent
John Lippitt, Director of Public Works ~
Jess Valenzuela, Director of Parks and Recreation
TO:
SUBJECT:
RESOLUTION - Accepting bids and awarding contract for the construction of
Memorial Park Improvements Parkway Community Center Reroofing- in the City
of Chula Vista, CA
FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION
A. Contract Amount $152,541.00
B. Contingency (approximately 15%1 23.459.00
C. Staff Cost (approximately 10%) 14,000.00
TOTAL FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION $190,000.00
FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION
A. Community Development Block Grant
Account 647-6470-PR112 $243,652.53
TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION $243,652.53
SA,JR-064
WPC F:\home\engineer\agenda\mempark.con
1/'*.5'
THE CITY OF CHUlA nSTA PAR7l'DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Statement of disclosure of certain ownership interests, payments, or campaign contnbutions, on all matters
" which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council, Planning Commission, and all other
, official bodies. The following information must be disclosed:
1. Ust the names of all persons having a financial interest in the contract, i.e., contractor,
subcontractor, 1T'~~~ supplier.
~~ ~fuiiLets<)
2. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all
individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership
interest in the partnership.
)/~
3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is non-profit organization or a trust,list the names
of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or
trustor of the trust.
/~
{4.
Have you had more than S2S0 worth of business transacted with any member of the City staff,
Boards, Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months? Yes_
No ~f yes, please indicate person(s):
s.
p'lease identify each and every person, including any agents, employees, consultants or independent
contractors who you have assigned to represent rou before the City in this matter.
11,/4
6.
Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggregate, contnbuted more than Sl,ooo to a
Counci1member in the current or preceding election period? Yes _ No J::::::"Ifyes, state which
Councilmember(s): .
~ is defined IS: ',Any in4ividua~ firm, CD-ptmIImJrip, joint -tuTC, association, ,ocial dub,ft'dtmuzl OtgDIIizDtiOll, ct>>pOMlion,
ulate, IJ1ISt, ~caver, qn4ialle, Mil and any <<he/' _n/)l. dly and c:ounny, dl); lIIunidpali/)l, tliltrict Dr othe/'polilit:DllUbdivisiOll,
Dr any othe/' f'OUP Dr combination aaing as a unil.'
(NOTE: AtUlch additional pages as necessary)
,Date:
/2-;2- 9:L
0~~~ ~~f
Signature of contrac or/applicant
c_
(A.II ~c.-\:DISa.OSE.1Xl')
#f (JARRell MIJt<My
Print or type name of contractor/applicant
1/ ., " [Reviled: 1I13O.'JO)
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item /,2,
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
Meeting Date 1/5/93
Resolution I~"'~ Accepting bids and awarding
contract for "Broadway Improvements from L Street to Naples
Street in the City of Chula Vista, CA" and consenting to the
substitution of the 10~ _~i,er subcontractors
Director of Public WOrk? [If'
City Manager ~1t-1(P (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No..xJ
f~
ITEM TITLE:
At 2:00 p.m. on November 18, 1992, in Conference Rooms 2 and 3 in the Public Services
Building, the Director of Public Works received sealed bids for the "Broadway
Improvements Project from L Street to Naples Street in the City of Chula Vista, CA".
RECOMMENDATION: That Council accept bids and award contract to Southland
Paving, Inc., a California Corporation in the amount of $1,592,598.05 and that Council
consent to Southland Paving, Inc. proposal to substitute Oropeza Construction for
LanDiego Landscaping as landscaping subcontractors for this project.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
Historical Backaround
On July 16, 1991, the City Council by Resolution 16264 approved the preliminary design
report for the improvement of Broadway from L Street to Naples Street and directed staff
to proceed with the final design plans. On February 4, 1992, the City Council by
Resolution 16490 approved the expansion of the project scope of work to include a major
storm drainage system within Broadway designed to relieve and reduce flooding within
the Harborside sub-basin tributary to the Telegraph Canyon Channel. The additional
funding was then included in the CIP submittal for FY 1992-93 with Gas Tax as the
funding source.
Environmental Status
The City's Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the project and determined
that it is categorically exempt under Section 15301, Class 1 Type (C), "Existing facilities"
of the California Environmental Quality Act.
I,), -I
Page 2, Item I)...
Meeting Date 1/5/93
Descriotion of Work
The work to be done is generally as follows: grading; removal and reconstruction of
curb, gutter and sidewalks; installation of drainage improvements; upgrade of traffic
signal; installation of landscaping and irrigation system; and other appurtenant
structures.
Rioht-of-Wav
Engineering staff along with property appraisers and real property consultants have
completed the acquisition of seven segments of street easements needed for the
construction of the Broadway improvements.
Bid Results
The project was advertised for a period of 40 days. During that period, plans were
purchased by 37 contractors and/or subcontractors on the bid opening date, bids were
submitted by eight contractors. The following is a summary of the eight bids received
in order of the lowest price first:
CONTRACTOR BID AMOUNT
1. Southland Paving, Inc. - Escondido $1,592,598.05
2. Granite Construction Co. - San Diego 1,723,868.00
3. R. E. Hazard Contracting Co. - San Diego 1,819,891.00
4. Superior Ready Mix Concrete - San Diego 1,900,369.05
5. T. B. Penick & Sons, Inc. - San Diego 1,972.495.50
6. West Coast General Corp. - lakeside 1,973.434.55
7. L. R. Hubbard Construction Co., Inc. - San Diego 2,141,413.70
8. Daley Corporation - San Diego 2,290,986.50
The low bid by Southland Paving, Inc., a California Corporation is below the
Engineer's estimate of $2,021,901.50 by $429,303.45 or 21.2%.
We have reviewed the low bid and recommend awarding the contract to Southland
Paving, Inc., a California Corporation. Southland Paving performed excellent work last
year when they constructed the Fifth Avenue street improvements from L Street to
Naples Street. It should be noted that on June 23, 1992, the City Council also
awarded Southland Paving a contract for the widening of Broadway from F Street to
I Street. Having both segments of Broadway constructed by one contractor is
mutually beneficial to the City and to the Contractor.
The Engineer's cost estimate was based on the average unit prices the City had
received in the last six-month period. The excellent bids received were well below the
JcJ...,;.
Page 3, Item I,)",
Meeting Date 1/5/93
Engineers estimate and may reflect the continued slump in the construction industry.
Disadvantaaed Business Enterorise Goal
The bid documents for this project require the Contractor to offer sufficient portion
of the work to Disadvantaged Business Enterprises (DBE), which include both minority
and women owned business enterprises. Chula Vista has set a goal of 15% of the
work for DBE participation in all contracts using Federal funds. Southland Paving, Inc.
has satisfied the DBE participation requirements by clearly making good faith efforts
to comply with the 15 % participation goal (see attached Exhibit A). The contractor
has informed staff that it will be substituting Oropeza Construction for LanDiego
Landscaping for the same bid amount. Both subcontractors are DBE certified and
therefore the DBE participation will not be affected (see attached Exhibit B and C).
FINANCIAL STATEMENT:
FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION
1. Contract Amount $1,592,598.05
2. Contingencies (approx. 10%1 19,629.90
3. Construction staff (5%1 11,351.61
4. Relocation of Water Facilities (approx. ) 195,000.00
TOT AL FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION $1,944,585.56
FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION
A. Broadway, L to Naples
1. Gas Tax - ST 102 $822,691.11
2. Trans. Net - ST 102 1,044,100.00
3. Receipt #109390 Deferral Deposit 42,855.45
4. Receipt #108334 Deferral Deposit 26,983.00
5. Receipt # 11 0440 Deferral Deposit 1,950.00
TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION $1,944,585.56
The available funds include deposits from three property owners. These funds will be
used for improvements required by three different deferral agreements negotiated
between the City and the affected property owners.
FISCAL IMPACT: TransNet funds and Gas Tax funds are the main source of funding
for this project. This expenditure of funding was authorized in the CIP budget as
indicated in the Financial Statement above. Upon completion of the project, the city
will perform routine maintenance.
SA: AX079
WPC F,IHOMElENGINEERIAGENDAIBDWY1MPS
E,,.II,8,,,.',,,' IJDr St"'~NEI)
/,J.'3 / 13"~
RESOLUTION NO. I~,yr
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING
CONTRACT FOR "BROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS FROM L
STREET TO NAPLES STREET IN THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA, CA" AND CONSENTING TO THE SUBSTITUTION
OF THE LOW BIDDER SUBCONTRACTORS
WHEREAS, at 2:00 p.m. on November 18, 1992, in Conference
Rooms 2 and 3 in the Public Services Building, the Director of
Public Works received the following eight sealed bids for the
"Broadway Improvements Project from L Street to Naples Street in
the city of Chula Vista, CA":
CONTRACTOR BID AMOUNT
1. Southland Paving, Inc. - Escondido $1,592,598.05
2. Granite Construction Co. - San Diego 1,723,868.00
3. R. E. Hazard Contracting Co. - San Diego 1,819,891.00
4. Superior Ready Mix Concrete - San Diego 1,900,369.05
5. T. B. Penick & Sons, Inc. - San Diego 1,972.495.50
6. West Coast General Corp. - Lakeside 1,973.434.55
7. L. R. Hubbard Construction Co., Inc. - San Diego 2,141.413.70
8. Daley Corporation - San Diego 2,290,986.50
WHEREAS, the low
California Corporation is
$2,021,901.50 by $429,303.45
bid by Southland Paving, Inc.,
below the Engineer's estimate
or 21. 2%; and
a
of
WHEREAS, staff has reviewed the low bid and recommends
awarding the contract to Southland Paving, Inc., a California
Corporation in that Southland Paving performed excellent work last
year when they constructed the Fifth Avenue street improvements
from L Street to Naples Street and they also have been awarded a
contract for the widening of Broadway from F Street to I Street and
having both segments of Broadway constructed by one contractor is
mutually beneficial to the City and to the Contractor; and
WHEREAS, the bid documents for this project require the
Contractor to offer sufficient portion of the work to Disadvantaged
Business Enterprises (DBE), which include both minority and women
owned business enterprises; and
1
I,). - f'
WHEREAS, the city of Chula vista has set a goal of 15% of
the work for DBE participation in all contracts using federal
funds, and Southland Paving, Inc. has satisfied the DBE
participation requirements by clearly making good faith efforts to
comply with the 15% participation goal and has informed staff that
it will be substituting oropeza Construction for LanDiego
Landscaping for the same bid amount; and
WHEREAS, both subcontractors are DBE certified and
therefore the DBE participation will not be affected; and
WHEREAS, the City's Environmental Review Coordinator has
reviewed the project and determined that it is categorically exempt
under Section 15301, Class 1 Type (Cl, "Existing facilities" of the
California Environmental Quality Act.
NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula vista does hereby accept said eight bids and
award the contract for "Broadway Improvements from L Street to
Naples Street in the city of Chula Vista, CA" to Southland Paving,
Inc. in the amount of $1,592,598.05 in accordance with the
specifications approved by the Director of Public Works.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the city does
to the substitution of Oropeza Construction
Landscaping as landscaping subcontractors for this
hereby consent
for LanDiego
project.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the city of
Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said
contract for and on behalf of the city of Chula vista.
Approved as to form by
~:11
, Ruth M. Fritsch, Assistant
city Attorney
Presented by
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
F:\home\attomey\bdwyimps
2 I,).-&'
MEMORANDUM
December 22, 1992
File: AX-079
TO: John Goss, City Manager
Bruce Boogaard, City Attorney
Lyman Christopher, Director of Finance
Beverly Authelet, City Clerk
Ken Goldkamp, Senior Civil Engineer
FROM: John Lippitt, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: Resolution - Accepting Bids and Awarding Contract for Broadway
Improvements Project from "L" Street to Naples Street in the City of
Chula Vista, California
FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION
1. Contract Amount $1,592,598.05
2. Contingencies lapprox. 10%) 79,629.90
3. Construction staff (5%) 77,357.61
4. Relocation of Water Facilities (approx. ) 195,000.00
TOTAL FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION $1,944,585.56
FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION
A. Broadway, L to Naples
1. Gas Tax 250-2501-ST 102 $822,697.11
2. Trans. Net 603-6030-ST 102 1,044,100.00
3. Receipt #109390 Deferral Deposit 42,855.45
4. Receipt # 1 08334 Deferral Deposit 26,983.00
5. Receipt # 11 0440 Deferral Deposit 7,950.00
TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION $1,944,585.56
SA: AX079
WPC F:\HOME\ENGINEER\AGENDA\BDWYIMPS
/)..-7
EXHIBIT "A"
November 24, 1992
TO:
Cliff Swanson, City Engineer
Chris Salomone, Community Development Director~-S.
VIA:
FROM:
David Harris, Community Development Specialist [).~_
Broadway, L to Naples
SUBJECT:
I have reviewed the low bid submitted by Southland Paving for
compliance with CalTrans Disadvantaged Business Enterprise (DBE)
program and have determined that Southland Paving met the goal of
15% DBE participation. Southland Paving listed the following DBE
subcontractors and suppliers:
payco Specialties
LanDiego Landscaping
Ayala Boring
Asphalt Applications
Kissinger Trucking
Charlie's Construction
Deco Supplies
$24,714
57,200
10,000
29,448
11,955
68,977*
28,891*
Total
$231,185 = 14.5%
(* amount is 60% of bid per CalTrans policy for suppliers)
Although Southland Paving fell .5% short of the 15% goal, it is
clear that the contractor made a good faith effort to comply with
this goal.
The contractor has informed staff that it will be substituting
Oropeza Gpnstruction for LanDiego Landscaping for the same bid
amount. Staff conf irmed that LanDiego is not interested in
performing the work for the amount they bid. Oropeza Construction
is a certified DBE and therefore the DBE participation is not
affected.
/2...,r
DE~-14-1992 13:28 FROM SOUTHLAND PAVING
TO
6915171
P.02
C::,l( \-\ \ B 1. T
II 'I
!3
SOUTHLAND PAVING, INC.
\""
General Engineering Contractor
361 No. Hale Avenue, Escondido. California 92029
(619) 747.6895 . FAX # (619) 747.1008
license No. 451191
Deoember 14,1992
city of Chula Vista
Engineering Department
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, California 91910
Attn: Mr. Alex Agha
RE: BROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS
FROM "L" STREET TO NAPLES STREET
SUBCONTRACTOR SUBSTITUTION
Gentlemen:
Due to an unfortunate mi5take made by our primary landscape
5ubcontraotor, Landiego Landscape, Ino., they have notified
Southland Paving, Inc. that they will not be able to perform the
Landsoape/lrrigation portion of this projeot for the price
quoted.
Because of this 151 tuation Southland Paving, Ino. is having to
turn to the second low bidder. As of this date. Southland
Paving. Ino. will subsitute "Oropeza Construotion Company" in
place of Landiego Landsoape. Ino.
Aocording to the D.B.E. Regulations and the City of Chula Vi5ta
Speoifications. this proposed substitution will not hinder the
15\ D.B.E. Requirement on this projeot.
Should you have any questions on this subjeot, please do not
hesitate to oall.
Sincerely,
. CC/INl\
IIp:broidwiY
/.2.- ,
DEC-14-1992 13:29 FROM SOUTHLAND PAVING
....'" u '" '"0''''''' L.HJ'i lJU.l,;U LI-lMI)SCRPE
TO
6915171 P.03
P.l/l
'I tI
E.Xt-\\B\\ C
LAND/EGO
LANDSCAPE, INC.
December II, 1992
Southland Pavin~, Inc.
361 North ~ale A~.nu~
E.r.ondido, CA 92069
:;;;;di ~~
.,
Attention: Chuck Cot.
R.~~rente, Broadway Improvements
'L' Street to Naplew
Chula Vi.ta
l3er.1: 1 emen :
I he~eby withdraw my bid propo.al ~or the aeeve
ref~ren~ed project, whiCh was ~.xed to you on
November 18, 199~.
I inadvertently omitted all of the irrigation system,
labor and matmrials, from my total price for the bid
i tlflT. 1153.
I apoloq129 for any problems this may have c.used
YOu.
Marc~lla Fescina
Pre!>i.dent
-
)~ -If)
P.O. BtJX 178766 . San Diego, CA. 92177 . (619) 282.7686 . State Lie. #583471
_"T....,........, .~ ,..,~__
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
ITEM 1.3
MEETING DATE 1/5/93
ITEM TITLE:
APPOINTMENT OF MR. ELOY VILLA TO FILL THE EXISTING VACANCY OF
THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION.
SUBMITTED BY:
CHAIR OF THE CIVIL SERVICE COMMISSION
DISCUSSION: Per the Charter of the City of Chula Vista, the members of the Civil
Service Commission shall be nominated in the following manner:
Two members shall be appointed by the City Council from a list
of four (4) persons to be nominated by election of the employees in
the Classified Service, two (2) members shall be appointed by the
City Council directly, and the fifth shall be appointed by the City
Council from a list of three (3) persons nominated by the four (4)
thus appointed.
From an original pool of 15 applicants the Civil Service Commission (Chair Mary
Salas, Commissioner Boerner, Vogel, Turner), utilizing criteria they developed
by consensus, narrowed the group to the 5 that they interviewed. The interview
process consisted of 8 structured questions posed to each of the applicants.
From those interviews and subsequent common discussion, they were able to narrow
the group to 3 nominees (Mr. Kelly, Mr. Villa, and Mr. Scott) and recommend Mr.
Villa for appointment to the vacant position.
While the Charter only specifies that the Commission nominate, the past practice
for this one Commission seat has been for the Commission to recommend an
appointment. At this point it is the Council~ prerogative to interview all 3
nominees or appoint Mr. Villa.
BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Appoi ntment of Mr. Vi 11 a to the Ci vil Servi ce
Commission. This term will expire on 6/30/96.
I ~- \
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
Meeting Date 01105/93
1'/
SUBMITTED BY:
RESOLUTION 16940 Approving and authorizing execution of an
Implementing Agreement with Major Retailer A (Home Depot), Rancho
del Rey Commercial Center, and related CEQA Findings
Community Development Director (~.
. f{t(J
CIty Manager 't,,) 11
(4/5ths Vote: Yes _ No..xJ
ITEM TITLE:
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND:
The Development Agreement covers the parcels to be purchased by Home
Depot, Kmart, and The Price Club and requires Implementing Agreements
be entered into prior to the issuance of building permits.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends continuance of this item to the City Council
meeting of January 19, 1993.
[C:IWP51ICQUNCILIl13SIPOWER.CTRJ
10/- /
L-\