HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 1993/02/09
"HI declare under penalty of perjury that I am
employed by the City of Chula Vista in the
Office of the City Clerk and that I posted
this Agenda/Notice on the Bulletin Board at
Tuesday, February 9, 1993the Public e ices Building an~t City Hall on
6:00 p.m. DATED. .:( ."j SIGNED '--c./~~,,-,-"
Resrular MeetinS?: of the City of Chula Vista City Council
Council Chambers
Public Services Building
CAlJ.. TO ORDER
1.
ROIL CAU.:
Councilmembers Fox ~ Horton ~ Moore -' Rindone -' and Mayor
Nader _
2. PLEDGE OF AIJ.EGIANCE TO THE FLAG. SII.ENf PRAYER
3.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
January 12, 1993, January 19, 1993, January 25, 1993 (Special
Council Meeting/Worksession), January 26, 1993, January 26,
1993 (Special Joint Meeting of the Redevelopment Agency/City
Council), January 28, 1993 (Regular Council
Meeting/Worksession), and February 2, 1993.
4. SPECJAL ORDERS OF THE DAY: None submitted.
CONSENT CALENDAR
(Items 5 though 11)
The stJJff recommendalions regarding the following items 1isted under the Consent Calendar wiD be enacted by the
CoundJ by one motion without discussion unless a CoundJmember, a member of the publU: or CiJ.y stJJff requests
that the item be pulled for discussion. If you wish ta speak 011 one of these items, prease fiH out a "&quest ta
Speak Form" avaiJabre in the lobby and submit it ta the CiJ.y Clerk prior ta the meeting. (Complete the green form
ta speak in favor of the stJJff recommendation; complete the pink form ta speak in opposition ta the stJJff
recommendation.) Items pulled from the Consent Calmdm wiD be discussed after Board and Commission
Recommendalions and Action Items. Items pulled by the publU: wiD be the first items of business.
5. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: None submitted.
6. RESOLUTION 16983 AMENDINGCOUN<JLPOllCYNUMBER662-05ENTlTI.ED"GENERALAND
SEXUAL HARASSMENT POllCY" . In 1982, the City adopted a Sexual
Harassment Policy. In 1991, this policy was updated to reflect new laws
and court cases in this area. The policy was also expanded to include
general harassment based on age, race, religion, color, or creed. In
January, 1992, the Federal Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 went
into effect. And in January, 1993, California State Labor code 1102.1 was
amended to provide protection from discrimination to individuals based on
their actual or perceived sexual orientation. Also effective January, 1993,
was AB. 2264 that required an employer to obtain, post and distribute the
California Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) poster on
Sexual Harassment or amend their own (the employer's) information sheet
on sexual harassment. Staff recommends approval of the resolution.
(Director of Personnel)
Agenda
-2-
February 9, 1993
7. RESOLUTION 16984 APPROVING AGREEMENT WI1H ATEL INC. FOR 1liE PURCHASE,
INSTALLATION, TRAINING, AND MAINTENANCE OF A VOICE MESSAGING
SYSTEM AND AUTHORIZING A LOAN FROM 1liE SEWER FUND TO 1liE
TELEPHONE SYSTEM COMPONENT OF 1liE PUBllC FACIUTIES
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS TIiEREFOR -
The City's Public Facilities Development Impact Fee includes various
projects to upgrade the City's Telephone System. One such project involves
the development of a Voice Messaging System which was included in the
Fiscal Year 1991-92 Capital Improvement Project budget. Staff
recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Management and
Information Services) 4/5th's vote required.
8. RESOLUTION 16985 ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR EAST "H" STREET
RECONSTRUCTION FROM 1-805 TO DELREYBOULEVARD - On 1120/93,
sealed bids were received for East 'H' Street reconstruction from I -805 to
Del Rey Boulevard. The work includes the placement of one and one.half
inch thick asphalt rubber hot mix overlay, removal of all alligatored
pavement areas and replacement with asphalt concrete, the milling of
street pavement in certain areas, signal loops, traffic control, adjustment
of manholes and storm drain clean outs, adjustment of survey well
monuments, and other miscellaneous work shown on the plans. Staff
recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Public Works)
9.A. RESOLUTION 16986 APPROVING SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING
SERVICES TO PREPARE 1liE TELEGRAPH CANYON SEWER BASIN PLAN
WI1H WIU.DAN ASSOCIATES - In compliance with the Telegraph Canyon
Basin Sewer Monitoring and Gravity Basin Usage Agreement with EastLake
Development, the City entered into a contract with Willdan Associates for
the Telegraph Canyon Sewer Basin Improvement and Financing Plan on
8/7/90. In order to reflect the total wastewater flow in the basin, it is
necessary to amend the plan to incorporate the flows expected to be
generated by the recently approved Kaiser Hospital and Medical Center.
The consultant will provide the additional services related to the
amendment at a cost of $5,300. Staff recommends approval of the
resolutions. (Director of Public Works)
B. RESOLUTION 16987 APPROVING SECOND AMENDMENT TO TELEGRAPH CANYON BASIN
SEWER MONITORING AND GRAVI1Y BASIN USAGE AGREEMENT WITH
EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
10. RESOLUTION 16988 TRANSFERRING FUNDS, ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACTS
FOR 1liE REROOFING OF LOMA VERDE RECREATION CENTER (pHASES
I AND II) AND 1liE POllCE DEPARTMENT BUILDING . On 12/23/92,
sealed bids were received for the reroofmg of Loma Verde Recreation
Center (phases I and II) and the Police Department building. Staff
recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Public Works)
4/5th's vote required.
Agenda
11.
REPORT
-3-
February 9,1993
RECONSIDERATION OF CHANGING TIlE NAME OF OTAY LAKES ROAD
BE1WEEN TELEGRAPH CANYON ROAD AND WUESTE ROAD TO
TELEGRAPH CANYON ROAD, PCM-93-07 - On 1/12/93, Council approved
the subject street name change. It was later determined that the residents
of Otay Lakes Lodge Mobile Home Park had not been notified as originally
intended. A memo from staff explaining the change and requesting
comments was distributed to each resident within the park. Several
residents have called and submitred letters opposing the change. Staff
recommends Council direct staff to schedule a public hearing for 3/2/93
in order to reconsider previous action. (Director of Planning)
* * END OF CONSENT CALENDAR * *
PUBIJC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLlTI10NS AND ORDINANCES
The foUowing items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. If you wish to gpeok
to any item, pleose fill out the "Request to SpeIlk Form" avaiIflb/e in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior
to the meeting. (Complete the green form to speok in favor of the staff recommendation; complete the pink form
to speak in opposition to the staff recommendation.) Comments are limited to five minuJes per individual.
12.
PUBIJC HEARING
13.
PUBIJC HEARING
14.
PUBIJC HEARING
CONSIDERATION OF COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NUMBER 64 TO
DEVELOP A GOLF DRlVING RANGE, BATTING AND PITCHING CAGES,
AND ACCESSORY USES ON FIFTH AVENUE NORTH OF "CO STREET - The
project involves construction of an athletic and sport recreational center on
approximately nine acres located on Fifth Avenue north of "CO Street within
the Inland Parcel of the Local Coastal Program. Staff recommends
continuation of the hearinl!: which will be renoticed prior to the public
hearinl!: date.
CONSIDERATION OF COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NUMBER 63 TO
ALLOW NATIONAL UNIVERSITY TO OCCUPY SPACE AT 740 BAY
BOULEVARD - Applicant has withdrawn the project. Staff recommends
Council accept the withdrawal. (Director of Community Development)
CONDmONAL USE PERMIT PCC-93-18: REQUEST TO ESTABIJSH AN
EDUCATIONAL FAeJIJ1Y AT 740 BAY BOULEVARD IN TIlE CVP ZONE
(NATIONAL UNlVERSI1Y) - FOSTER PROPERTY - Applicant has withdrawn
the project. Staff recommends Council accept the withdrawal. (Director
of Planning)
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
This is an opportunity for the general public to address the City Council on any subject matter within the Council's
jurisdiction that is !!!!! an ium on this agenda. (State law, however, generally prohibits the City Council from
toking action on any issues not included on the posted agenda.) If you wish to address the Council on such a
subject, pleose complete the yeUow "Request to Speak Under Oral CommuniJ;ations Form" avaiIflb/e in the lobby
and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Those who wish to speak, pleose give your name and address
for record purposes and foHow up action. Your time is limited to three minuJes per speaker.
Agenda
-4-
February 9, 1993
BOARD AND COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
This is the time the City Council will consider items whU:h luNe been fOl'Warded to them for consideration by OIU!
of the CUy's Boards, Commissions and/or Committees.
None submitted.
ACTION ITEMS
The items listed in this section of the agenda are expected to elicit substantifll discussions and deIiberalions by the
Council, staff, or members of the general public. The items will be considered individuaI1y by the Council and stIlff
recommendations may in certain cases be presented in the a1temoIive.. Those who wish to speak, pIeose fill out
a "Requut to SpeiJk" form available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. PublU:
CommenlS are limited to five mi1wtes.
15. RESOLUTION 16989 AUlliORIZING TIiE INSTALLATION OF DEIJNEATORS AS A TEMPORARY
MEASURE ON A PORTION OF TIiE 100 BLOCK OF "E" STREET - Staff was
requested to provide additional speed enforcement and information
regarding vehicular traffic on the 100 block of "E" Street. Staff
recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Public Works)
ITEMS Pm.I.ED FROM TIiE CONSENT CALENDAR
This is the time the City Council will discuss items whU:h luNe been removed from the Consent CaIendor. Agenda
items pulled at the request of the publU: will be considered prior to those puJled by Councilmembers. PublU:
CommenlS are limited to five mi1wtes per individual.
OTHER BUSINESS
16. CJ1Y MANAGER'S REPORTrS)
a. Scheduling of meetings.
17. MAYOR'S REPORTCS)
a. Appoint new delegate and alternate to Special Act District for Waste Water.
18. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilman Moore
a. Replacement appointment to SAD and two alternates.
Councilman Rindone
b. Regulation of Chula Vista taxicabs and potential impacts if not regulated by the City of
Chula Vista.
Councilman Fox
c. Approval of members to the Environmental Enterprise Zone Task Force.
Agenda
-5-
February 9, 1993
ADJOURNMENT
The City Council will meet in a closed session immediately following the Council meeting to discuss:
Potential litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 - lGOU vs. the City of Chula
Vista.
The meeting will adjourn to (a closed session and thence to) the Regular City Council Meeting on February
16, 1993 at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers.
A Special Joint Meeting of the City CouncillRedevelopment Agency will be held immediately following the
City Council meeting.
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
ITEM
~
MEETING DATE Februarv 9. 1993
ITEM TITLE: RESOLUTION
& Sexual Harassment Policy".
SUBMITTED BY: DIRECTOR OF PERSONNEL~
REVIEWED BY: CITY MANAGER ~
RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the resolution.
It- 98"'3
Amending Council
Policy #662-05 entitled "General
(4/5th Vote: Yes__ NO~)
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: N/A
DISCUSSION: In 1982, the City of Chula Vista adopted a Sexual Harassment
Policy. In 1991, this policy was updated to reflect new laws and court cases in
this area. The policy was also expanded to include general harassment based on
age, race, religion, color, or creed.
In January, 1992, the Federal American with Disabilities Act of 1990 went
into effect. And in January, 1993, Cali forni a State Labor code 1102.1 was
amended to provide protection from discrimination to individuals based on their
actual or perceived sexual orientation. Also effective January, 1993, is
A.B.2264 that requires an employer to obtain, post and distribute the California
Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) poster on Sexual Harassment or
amend their own (the employer's) information sheet on sexual harassment. The
employer's information sheet must contain the following information:
1. The illegality of sexual harassment;
2. The definition of sexual harassment under both Federal and State
law;
3. A description of sexual harassment and examples;
4. The description of the employer's complaint process available to the
employees.
5. The legal remedies and complaint process available under the DFEH;
6. Directions on how to contact DFEH; and
7. The protection against retaliation for filing a complaint or for
participating in an investigation or hearing conducted by the DFEH.
In the process of updating this policy, definitions and concepts that may
have been unclear or inadequate have been changed to enhance understanding and
clarity. The policy also referred to both an informal and formal complaint
procedure but thi s was not cl early deli neated by the procedure i tse 1 f. Thi s
revision addresses this issue. Finally, additional contacts are listed so the
complainant may have a choice of who they may complain to. Attached shows the
changes from the current policy. Also attached is the 1991 Agenda Statement.
NOT SCANNED
FISCAL IMPACT: The adoption of this resolution will serve to reduce potenltial
future liability exposure.
~-l~-1-
RESOLUTION
NO. 1(,98".::I
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AMENDING COUNCIL POLICY #662-05
ENTITLED "GENERAL & SEXUAL HARASSMENT POLICY"
WHEREAS, in 1982, the city of Chula vista adopted a
Sexual Harassment Policy; and
WHEREAS, in 1991, this policy was updated to reflect new
laws and court cases in this area and was also expanded to include
general harassment based on age, race, religion, color, or creed;
and
WHEREAS, in January, 1993, California State Labor Code
1102.1 was amended to provide protection from discrimination to
individuals based on their actual or perceived sexual orientation;
and
WHEREAS, also effective January 1993, is A.B. 2264 that
requires an employer to obtain, post and distribute the California
Department of Fair Employment and Housing poster on Sexual
Harassment or amend the employer's information sheet on sexual
harassment; and
WHEREAS, in the process of updating this policy,
definitions and concepts that may have been unclear or inadequate
have been changed to enhance understanding and clarity.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula vista does hereby amend Council Policy #662-05
entitled "General & Sexual Harassment Policy" as set forth in
Exhibit "A", attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference
as if set forth in full.
Candy Boshell, Director of
Personnel
aI
Presented by
F:\home\attomcy\662.05
t-:J/I.-t.
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
ITEM
MEETING DATE
Mav 7. 1991
ITEM TITLE:
RESOLUTION Amending Council Policy 1662-05, .Sexual
Harassment Policy., and adopting amended Council Policy 1662-
05 entitled .General and Sexual Harassment Policy. ,
DIRECTOR OF PERSONNELr~
SUBMmED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
CITY MANAGER
(4/Sth Vote: YES___ NO-1L)
RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the resolution to amend Council Policy 1662-
05 replacing Resolution 111058,
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATIONS: None
DISCUSSION: In 1982 the City of Chula Vista adopted Resolution 11058, .Sexual
Harassment Policy", The policy defined sexual harassment, established the
standards for providing a workplace that was free from all types of
discrimination including sexual harassment and cormnitted the City to the
guidelines set forth by the Equal Employment Opportunity Cormnission in regards
to defining sexual harassment in relationship to the Federal laws it violates.
Since 1982, court cases dealing with sexual harassment have further defined and
clarified the issues, It has also become apparent that a policy that dealt with
general harassment was needed to establish clear and legally defensible
guidelines for all employees in this area. Therefore, this new oolicv is a
combination of General and sexual harassment which reflects language that has
been developed through more recent court cases. It also orovides a comolaint
orocess that permits employees who believe that they have been either harassed
or discriminated against to take action to correct the situation.
Attached is a copy of the old policy, The new policy is not a revision of the
old policy; therefore, a document showing deletions and additions is not feasible
FISCAL IMPACT: None
A:\Al1J\HAMSS,.POL
,,-:>,
GENERAL AND SEXUAL HARASSMENT POLICY
POLICY DISCUSSION
The City of Chula Vista is committed to maintaining a workplace environment free from
all forms of discrimination and harassment including sexual harassment. The purpose of
this written policy statement is to familiarize employees and supervisors with the legal and
moral parameters of harassment. Harassment is not only illegal, it creates a negative
work environment that reduces productivity and morale, undermines the integrity of the
workplace and destroys professionalism. It is the legal right of every employee to be able
to work in a place that is free from discrimination and harassment. It is the duty of all
employees to abide by this policy and the duty of all supervisors and managers to
implement this policy to avoid unnecessary legal and personal conflicts.
BACKGROUND
The legal framework feJ: on which the Courts have based their decisions regarding
harassment are founded upon Federal and State Laws entitling citizens to civil rights.
Specifically, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 703, the Americans with
Disabilities Act of 1990, aREi California Government Code Sections 12940 & 12921, Labor
Code Section 1102.1, and other pertinent references clearly state that harassment
including sexual harassment, which is a form of discrimination, is in violation of an
individual's civil rights; therefore, illegal. The impact of enforcement of these laws has
mandated employers to develop, implement, and enforce s progressive policy statements
prohibiting harassment in order to receive funding and/or avoid costly litigation
proceedings.
REFERENCES
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, Section 703
EEOC Final Guidelines
California Administrative Code, Title 2, Section 7282.6
California Government Code Sections 12940, 12921, and 11135
Americans with Disabilities Act. 1990 (effective Januarv 26. 1992)
Labor Code Section 1102.1
POLICY STATEMENT
It is the policy of the City of Chula Vista to prohibit all harassment inGluEling sexual
harassment of any employee in the City of Chllla Vista that no officer or emolovee shall
enaaae in discrimination. includina harassment. based on an emolovee's aae. race.
national origin. religion. color. creed. disability. sex. and/or sexual orientation. The
employees of this city have the legal right to work in a discrimination-free environment.
t--'?/"--f
GENERAL HARASSMENT
Harassment is defined as unsolicited and unwelcome behavior based on race, religion,
color, sex, national oriain. creed, disabilitv. eF age. or sexual orientation. 'Nhish saR be
Such behaviors can be manifested in manv wavs includina. but not limited to. written,
verbal, phy&isal Gr \<i&l,jal visual or phvsical behaviors. These behaviors can be directed
at a specific employee or their family member(s). These behaviors can also be directed
at one individual but offend another. Or these behaviors may not be directed at any
individual in the workplace but their presence is offensive to one or more co-workers.
Such behaviors include:
1. Verbal harassment, e.g., epithets, derogatory comments, eF slurs. iokes or
dearadina words used to describe an individual or one of the above aroups:
2. Physical harassment, e.g., assault, unwanted touchina. impeding or blocking
movement, or any physical interference with normal work or movement;
3. Visual forms of harassment, e.g., derogatory posters, cartoons or drawings;
4. Excludina or ostracizina an emplovee based on race. reliaion. color. sex. national
origin.creed. disabilitv. aae and/or sexual orientation.
SEXUAL HARASSMENT
Sexual harassment is a violation of Section 703 of Title VII of the Federal Civil Rights Act
of 1964 and the State of California Government Code Section 12940. Unwelcome sexual
advances, requests for sexual favors, and other verbal, visual or physical conduct of a
sexual nature constitute sexual harassment when:
1. Submission to such conduct is made explicitly or implicitly as a term or condition
of an individual's employment;
2. Submission to or rejection of such conduct by an individual is used as the basis
for employment decisions affecting that individual; or
3. Such conduct affects or has the potential to affect an individual's work
performance or creates an intimidating, hostile, or offensive working environment.
For the purpose of further clarification, general Gr sexual harassment includes but is not
limited to:
1. Sexually suggestive or obscene letters, notes, or invitations:
2. Sexually derogatory comments, such as sexual jokes, remarks, questions, teasing,
leering, or gestures;
3. Touching, patting, pinching, impeding or blocking movement;
4. Sexually suggestive objects, such as pictures, cartoons, posters;
&,-r
5. Continuance of expressing sexual interest after being informed that the interest is
unwelcome;
6. Requesting sexual favors as a condition of employment;
7. Engaging in implicit or explicit coercive sexual behavior which is used to control,
influence or affect the career, salary and/or work environment of another
employee;
8. Enqaqinq in harassment of an emplovee due to their sexual orientation.
COMPLAINT PROCESS
If an employee believes that they have been subject to any form of harassment including
sexual harassment or are being discriminated against based on the State and/or Federal
laws previously cited, they have the right to file a formal or informal complaint. Before
a complaint Is filed, it is recommended that the violated employee acknowledge to
the harasser that their behavior is offensIve, unwanted or derogatory. If harassment
continues to persist, a formal complaint with the City should then be filed.
An emplovee also has the riqht to file a complaint of discrimination with the California
Department of Fair Emplovment and Housinq whether or not thev have filed a complaint
with the City. Complaints must be made within (1) one vear of the harassment. To file
a complaint. either call (619) 237-7405 or file a complaint in person at 110 West "C" Street.
Room 1702. San Dieqo. The complainant. as well as other emplovees who support the
complainant. are protected aqainst anv retaliatorv action stemminq from the complaint.
Those emplovees involved in anv retaliatorv events will be subiect to disciplinarv action.
The City of Chula Vista will enforce disciplinary action against any person that violates this
policy. This discipline can include termination.
COMPLAINT PROCEDURE
Informal Procedure
Stas 1
The allegation of general or sexual harassment should be discussed with anv of the
followinq at the complainant's choice: the complainant's sal3artmant haas, sl,Il3el'\'isor or
the DireGtor af Persannal supervisor. Department Head. Assistant Director of Personnel.
the Director of Personnel. a Deputv City Manaqer. or the Assistant City Manaqer. The
complainant's supervisor and/or department Head shall be informed and meet with the
complainant in an attempt to resolve the complaint at the departmental level. This should
be done within a reasonable period of time from when the incidence or action affecting
the employee occurred. If the complainant is not satisfied with the results of the informal
procedure. thev may initiate the formal procedure.
~ ../~
Formal Procedure
SteEl 2 Step 1
U~eA receipt of the written complaint, The complainant shall file a written or verbal
complaint with the Director of Personnel. tIhe Personnel Director. upon receipt of the
complaint. will inform the appropriate Department Head and supervisor of the allegation.
The Gomplnin:lnt'e 6wpervisClr and/er DopartmsRt Haad shall meet with the 6Gf'RplainaAt
in an attempt to reselve the complaint :at the department level. If the cem~laiAant is nat
satisties with resl:Jlts ef the meetinQ, tIhe Personnel Director, within (10) ten working days,
will assemble a fact finding committee to review the complaint. The fact finding committee
will include fB a Personnel Direetor Department representative {2t and an appointee of
the City Manager. (~) an appeintQe af the complainant. The investigation process shall
be conducted in a timely manner.
The complaint will be reviewed to:
1. Determine QO'/erninQ al:Jthority applicable leaal basis of the complaint.
2. Determine if sufficient grounds exist to substantiate the validity of the complaint
which includes interviewing the complainant, alleged harasser, witnesses and any
other individual who may have relevant information substantiating or refuting the
allegation.
SteEl ~ Step 2
Upon the completion of the investigation, all parties involved will be informed of the
findings within (10) ten working days. The fact finding committee will report the results
of their investigation to the Personnel Director, the Department Director, the complainant
and the alleged harasser. If the investigation does not yield sufficient evidence to
substantiate the allegation, all parties involved will be notified of the findings and the case
will be terminated at this step.
Step 1 Step 3
If it is determined that general or sexual harassment has occurred, the Department
Director will initiate appropriate disciplinary action which may be up to and including
dismissal. The severity of the discipline will be determined by the severity and/or
frequency of the offense.
SteEl 5 Step 4
DisGiplin:lry action tal<en wnder this praG9duro fRay be apP13alod \vith er 'Nithout
representation sl:Jejeet to appoal and grievanse prssesl:Jres indioated in applisaele
aQreements, City polisies sr Civil Service Rl:Jles. If an emplovee who is disciplined under
this procedure has appeal riahts. said appeal riahts mav be exercised.
WP:MASTERS.2GEN&SEX.POL
(Rev. 2193)
"-II
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
Meeting Date
?
02/09/93
SUBMITTED BY:
RESOLUTION I" '8''IAPprOVing Agreement with ATEL Inc. for the
purchase, installation, training, and maintenance of a Voice
Messaging System and authorizing a loan from the Sewer Fund to
the Telephone System Component of the Public Facilities
Development Impact Fee and appropriating funds therefor.
Director of Management & Information services;f1;l
ITEM TITLE:
REVIEWED BY: City Manage# (4/5ths Vote: Yes..1L No )
The approved FY 1991-92 CIP includes a project to install a Voice Messaging
System at the City of Chu1a Vista. The system is expected to enhance both staff
productivi ty and service to the public. Given the increased service and workload
demands resulting from the local economic downturn and the State's budgetary
deficit, it is more important than ever that productivity enhancements be
implemented whenever feasible. The Voice Processing System we propose to install
will:
increase the
record and
repetitively
productivity of clerical staff by
deliver phone messages and (2)
provide standard information;
(1) reducing the need to
reducing the need to
increase the productivity of professional staff by (1) avoiding the
innumerable delays and wasted time resulting from "telephone tag" and (2)
permitting them to conduct phone business according to their own
schedules, thereby enabling them to remain focused on specific projects;
increase the productivity of field staff by enabling them to receive calls
and retrieve detailed messages without leaving their worksite;
improve service to persons having business with the City through selective
use of lluser friendlyrr automated attendant systems, facilitating such
functions as the scheduling of building inspections.
The installation of the proposed system will be accomplished in several phases;
1). a pilot will be run using one or two small departments, for internal calls
only. 2). The pilot will be expanded to include additional departments, again for
internal calls only. 3). A pilot for the automated attendant system will be run
using a department with minor citizen contact (Information Systems). 4).
Implementation to additional departments will be initiated after the first three
phases have been successfully completed. 5). Continued monitoring and improvement
of the system to provide the best service to the citizens as well as to our
employees.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt resolution approving;
1. Agreement with ATEL for the described voice mail system
2. Authorization of a loan of $50,000 from the Sewer Fund and
appropriating the funds to the DIF Telephone System Upgrade Fund.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable
/'1
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date
7
02/09/93
DISCUSSION:
The City of Chula Vista prides itself on having one of the lowest per-capita
staffing ratios, both within San Diego County and nationally (45th out of 50 top
cities in per-capita staffing as ranked by City & State Magazine). While the
City currently provides a high level of service, resources continue to be
stretched thinner and thinner. Growing service demands and restrictions on new
General Fund hirings make it extremely difficult to maintain our current
performance levels. As such, the City must avail itself of productivity
enhancing technology, while remaining sensitive to providing quality services and
quality interactions with our citizens and customers. A properly designed voice
processing system can achieve these goals:
Voice mail allows professional
conversations according to their
focused on specific projects;
staff and managers to conduct phone
own schedules, enabling them to remain
Voice mail allows a complete question to be posed and subsequently
researched prior to responding, avoiding innumerable delays due to
telephone tag (our internal study showed that the average phone answerer
throughout the City takes 15 messages per day, messages which generally
only stipulate that someone was returning a call or that someone wants a
call returned);
Voice mail enables workers in the field to efficiently receive calls and
retrieve detailed messages without leaving their worksite;
Voice mailboxes can be used to ensure that all Council members/departments
receive timely notification of important items;
Experiences of other cities show that simplified, user friendly automated
attendant systems can save staff time and enhance customer service in a variety
of areas. The cities of San Diego, Escondido, and Carlsbad use voice messaging
and Automated Attendant Systems. A few of the applications that have been
identified to date include:
The Finance Department plans to use the voice mail system to properly
route calls coming in on the main Finance telephone number to various
functional areas such as Business Licenses, Payroll, Accounts Payable,
Central Stores, or Purchasing thereby freeing-up office staff time.
The Building and Housing Department plans to use the voice mail system to
handle calls for building inspection or code enforcement, facilitating the
scheduling of appointments.
The Personnel Department plans to use the system to provide up-to-date
listings of job openings and application procedures, thereby eliminating
the need for staff to repetitively provide this information.
?~J.
Page 3, Item
Meeting Date
7
02/09/93
Voice Messaging and Automated Attendant systems can be of great benefit to the
City of Chula Vista, however, staff is very sensitive to the fact that an
improperly implemented voice mail system can be a source of concern for both the
public and City staff. In order to insure that the system is very user friendly
and a benefit to the City and the public, staff will proceed very carefully with
each implementation phase and insure that the public always has the option to
talk to a live person if they so desire. In addition, the system being proposed
includes a "Spanish Language" capability so that all of the system messages can
be heard in Spanish as well as English.
On October 9, 1992, staff
vendors and advertised the
vendors that responded to
sent requests for proposals to seven voice messaging
existence of the RFP in the local newspapers. The six
the request, all San Diego based companies, were:
ATEL
APC
Dialpro
NEC
FUJITSU
Octel
Proposal
$ 50,856
$ 92,404
$ 96,200
$ 96,549
$105,659
$118,670
The proposals were reviewed to determine which proposal best met the
specifications set forth in the RFP. Additionally, the proposals were evaluated
on the cost-effectiveness of their proposed system. The evaluation committee
consisting of the Director of Management & Information Services, Computer
Operations Manager, and the GIS Manager met and evaluated each proposal against
a pre-established list of criteria which included the following:
Responsiveness to the RFP
Cost
System performance
Growth Potential
Vendor experience
During the evaluation process, staff was given the opportunity to use each of the
proposed Voice Mail Systems for the full duration of the evaluation period.
Staff objectively explored the features of each system to determine the ease of
use and functionality of each system. All of the proposed systems met with the
approval of the evaluation committee. Staff also evaluated the hardware being
proposed by each vendor. ATEL was the only vendor to use standard microcomputer
architecture while the other vendors proposed using "proprietary" hardware, which
is generally more expensive to purchase and maintain. The lowest cost proposal,
submitted by ATEL, meets all of the City's required specifications, and was the
proposal rated highest by the selection committee.
?~;J
Page 4, Item
Meeting Date
7
02/09/93
The proposed contract costs are for the purchase of hardware and software to
operate the Voice Processing System, installation of the system, training for
City employees to operate and administer the system, and an option to purchase
a multi-year maintenance contract for a fixed price at the end of the one-year
warranty period. The City of Chula Vista has not contracted with ATEL for any
other services in the past.
Fiscal Impact
The Voice Mail System is part of, and intended to be financed from, the Telephone
element of the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee ("Public Facilities
DIF"). Sufficient funds have not yet been collected for the Public Facilities
DIF to pay for the Voice Mail System. Therefore, staff is proposing that $50,000
be loaned from the Sewer Revenue Fund to the Public Facilities DIF Telephone Fund
in order to cover the cost of the new system. The Sewer Revenue Fund will be
paid back over a five-year period, with interest at 6.5% per annum, from future
Public Facilities DIF revenue. The annual payments to the Sewer Revenue Fund
will be $12,032. In addition, maintenance for the proposed system will be $3,697
per year after the one-year warranty period has expired.
?~o/
RESOLUTION NO.
I~ 1~'I
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH ATEL INC.
FOR THE PURCHASE, INSTALLATION, TRAINING, AND
MAINTENANCE OF A VOICE MESSAGING SYSTEM AND
AUTHORIZING A LOAN FROM THE SEWER FUND TO THE
TELEPHONE SYSTEM COMPONENTS OF THE PUBLIC
FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE AND
APPROPRIATING FUNDS THEREFOR
WHEREAS, the City'S Public Facilities Development Impact
Fee includes various projects to upgrade the city's telephone
system; and
WHEREAS, one such project involves the development of a
Voice Processing System, which was included in the FY 1991-92
Capital Improvement Project budget approved by the Council; and
WHEREAS, the system is expected to enhance both staff
productivity and service to the public.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula vista does hereby approve the Agreement with ATEL
COMMUNICATIONS, INC. for the purchase, installation, training and
maintenance of a Voice Messaging System, a copy of which is on file
in the office of the City Clerk.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor is hereby
authorized and directed to execute said Agreement for and on behalf
of the city of Chula vista.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby
authorize a loan of $50,000 from the Sewer Fund and appropriates
the funds to the Telephone DIF, which Sewer Fund will be paid back
over a five-year period, with interest at 6.5% per annum, from
future Public Facilities DIF revenue.
"1"
Presented by
Louis v1gn ia 0, Director of
Management & Information Services
F:\home\attorney\ATBL
7-5!7-h
Agreement between
City of Chula Vista
and
ATEL Communications, Inc.
For The purchase, Turn-Key Installation And Implementation
Of A Fully Integrated Voice Processing System
This agreement ("Agreement"), dated December 31, 1992 for the
purposes of reference only, and effective as of the date last
executed unless another date is otherwise specified in Exhibit A,
Paragraph 1 is between the City-re~ted entity as is indicated on
Exhibit A, paragraph 2, as such ("City"), whose business form is
set forth on Exhibit A, paragraph 3, and the entity indicated on
the attached Exhibit A, paragraph 4, as Vendor, whose business form
is set forth on Exhibit A, paragraph 5, and whose place of business
and telephone numbers are set forth on Exhibit A, paragraph 6
("Vendor"), and is made with reference to the following facts:
Recitals
Whereas, the City desires to purchase, install and implement
a Voice Processing System; and,
Whereas, the City issued a Request For Proposal for such
services and the Vendor responded with a proposal; and,
Whereas, the City desires to engage the Vendor to provide
these services by reason of its qualifications and experience for
performing such services; and,
Whereas, Vendor warrants and represents that they are
experienced and staffed in a manner such that they are and can
prepare and deliver the services required of Vendor to City
within the time frames herein provided all in accordance with the
terms and conditions of this Agreement;
7--7
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City and Vendor do
hereby mutually agree as follows:
I. Vendor's Duties
A. General Duties
Vendor shall perform all of the services described on the
attached Exhibit A, Paragraph 7, entitled "General Duties"; and,
B. Scope of Work and Schedule
In the process of performing and delivering said "General
Duties", Vendor shall also perform all of the services described
in Exhibit A, Paragraph 8, entitled" Scope of Work and
Schedule", not inconsistent with the General Duties, according
to, and within the time frames set forth in Exhibit A, Paragraph
8, and deliver to City such Deliverables as are identified in
Exhibit A, Paragraph 8, within the time frames set forth therein,
time being of the essence of this agreement. The General Duties
and the work and deliverables required in the Scope of Work and
Schedule shall be herein referred to as the "Defined Services".
Failure to complete the Defined Services by the times indicated
does not, except at the option of the City, operate to terminate
this Agreement.
C. Reductions in Scope of Work
City may independently, or upon request from Vendor, from
time to time reduce the Defined Services to be performed by the
Vendor under this Agreement. Upon doing so, City and Vendor
agree to meet in good faith and confer for the purpose of
negotiating a corresponding reduction in the compensation
associated with said reduction.
D. Additional Services
In addition to performing the Defined Services herein set
forth, City may require Vendor to perform additional services
related to the Defined Services ("Additional Services"), and upon
doing so in writing, if they are within the scope of services
offered by Vendor, Vendor shall perform same on a time and
materials basis at the rates set forth in the "Rate Schedule" in
Exhibit A, Paragraph 11 (C), unless a separate fixed fee is
otherwise agreed upon. All compensation for Additional Services
shall be paid monthly as billed.
E. Standard of Care
Vendor, in performing any Services under this agreement,
whether Defined Services or Additional Services, shall perform in
a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily
exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under
?...r
similar conditions and in similar locations.
F. Insurance
Vendor represents that it and its agents, staff and
subvendors employed by it in connection with the Services
required to be rendered, are protected against the risk of loss
by the following insurance coverages, in the following categor-
ies, and to the limits specified, policies of which are issued by
Insurance Companies that have a Best's Rating of "A, Class V" or
better, or shall meet with the approval of the City:
Statutory Worker's Compensation Insurance and Employer's
Liability Insurance coverage in the amount set forth in the
attached Exhibit A, paragraph 9.
Commercial General Liability Insurance including Business
Automobile Insurance coverage in the amount set forth in Exhibit
A, Paragraph 9, combined single limit applied separately to each
project away from premises owned or rented by Vendor, which names
City and Applicant as an Additional Insured, and which is primary
to any policy which the City may otherwise carry ("Primary
Coverage"), and which treats the employees of the City and
Applicant in the same manner as members of the general public
("Cross-liability Coverage").
Errors and Omissions insurance, in the amount set forth in
Exhibit A, Paragraph 9, unless Errors and Omissions coverage is
included in the General Liability policy.
G. Proof of Insurance Coverage.
1. Certificates of Insurance.
Vendor shall demonstrate proof of coverage herein
required, prior to the commencement of services required under
this Agreement, by delivery of Certificates of Insurance
demonstrating same, and further indicating that the policies may
not be canceled without at least thirty (30) days written notice
to the Additional Insured.
2. Policy Endorsements Required.
In order to demonstrate the Additional Insured
Coverage, Primary Coverage and Cross-liability Coverage required
under Vendor's Commercial General Liability Insurance Policy,
Vendor shall deliver a policy endorsement to the City
demonstrating same, which shall be reviewed and approved by the
Risk Manager.
H. Performance Bond.
In the event that Exhibit A, at Paragraph 9, indicates the
need for Vendor to provide a Performance Bond, which indication
7'"
shall be made by checking the parenthetical space adjacent to the
term, "Performance Bond", then Vendor shall provide to the City a
performance bond by a surety and in a form satisfactory to the
City Attorney in an amount indicated in the space adjacent to the
term, "Performance Bond", in said Paragraph 9, Exhibit A.
II. Duties of the City
A. Consultation and Cooperation
City shall regularly consult the Vendor for the purpose of
reviewing the progress of the Defined Services and Schedule
therein contained, and to provide direction and guidance to
achieve the objectives of this agreement. The City shall permit
access to its office facilities, files and records by Vendor
throughout the term of the agreement. In addition thereto, City
agrees to provide the information, data, items and materials set
forth on Exhibit A, Paragraph 10, and with the further
understanding that delay in the provision of these materials
beyond 30 days after authorization to proceed, shall constitute a
basis for the justifiable delay in the Vendor's performance of
this agreement.
B. Compensation
Upon receipt of a properly prepared billing from Vendor,
City shall compensate Vendor for all services rendered by Vendor
according to the terms and conditions set forth in Exhibit A,
Paragraph 11 adjacent to the governing compensation relationship
indicated by a "checkm<c.rk" next to the appropriate arrangement,
and shall compensate Vendor for out of pocket expenses as
provided in Exhibit A, Paragraph 12.
All billings submitted by Vendor shall contain sufficient
information as to the propriety of the billing to permit the City
to evaluate that the amount due and payable thereunder is proper.
III. Administration of Contract
Each party designates the individuals ("Contract
Administrators") indicated on Exhibit A, Paragraph 13, as said
party's contract administrator who is authorized by said party to
represent them in the routine administration of this agreement.
IV. Term.
This Agreement shall terminate when the Parties have
complied with all executory provisions hereof.
V. Liquidated Damages
The provisions of this section apply if a Liquidated Damages
Rate is provided in Exhibit A, Paragraph 14.
?., / 1/
It is acknowledged by both parties that time is of the
essence in the completion of this Agreement. It is difficult to
estimate the amount of damages resulting from delay in per-
formance. The parties have used their judgment to arrive at a
reasonable amount to compensate for delay.
Failure to complete the Defined Services within the allotted
time period specified in this Agreement shall result in the
following penalty: For each consecutive calendar day in excess
of the time specified for the completion of the respective work
assignment or Deliverable, the vendor shall pay to the City, or
have withheld from monies due, the sum of Liquidated Damages Rate
provided in Exhibit A, Paragraph 14 ("Liquidated Damages Rate").
Time extensions for delay~ beyond the vendor's control,
other than delays caused by the City, shall be requested in
writing to the City's Contract Administrator, or designee, prior
to the expiration of the specified time. Extensions of time,
when granted, will be based upon the effect of delays to the work
and will not be granted for delays to minor portions of work
unless it can be shown that such delays did or will delay the
progress of the work.
VI. Financial Interests of Vendor
A. Vendor is Designated as an FPPC Filer.
If Vendor is designated on Exhibit A, Paragraph 15, as an
"FPPC filer", Vendor is deemed to be a "Vendor" for the purposes
of the Political Reform Act con~lict of interest and disclosure
provisions, and shall report e('Jnomic interests to the City Clerk
on the required Statement of Economic Interests in such reporting
categories as are specified in Paragraph 15 of Exhibit A, or if
none are specified, then as determined by the City Attorney.
B. Decline to Participate.
Regardless of whether Vendor is designated as an FPPC Filer,
Vendor shall not make, or participate in making or in any way
attempt to use Vendor's position to influence a governmental
decision in which Vendor knows or has reason to know Vendor has a
financial interest other than ~he compensation promised by this
Agreement.
C. Search to Determine Economic Interests.
Regardless of whether Vendor is designated as an FPPC Filer,
Vendor warrants and represents that Vendor has diligently
conducted a search and inventory of Vendor's economic interests,
as the term is used in the regulations promulgated by the Fair
Political Practices Commission, and has determined that Vendor
does not, to the best of Vendor's knowledge, have an economic
interest which would conflict with Vendor's duties under this
agreement.
?//
D. Promise Not to Acquire Conflicting Interests.
Regardless of whether Vendor is designated as an FPPC Filer,
Vendor further warrants and represents that Vendor will not
acquire, obtain, or assume an economic interest during the term
of this Agreement which would constitut~ a conflict of interest
as prohibited by the Fair Political Practices Act.
E. Duty to Advise of Conflicting Interests.
Regardless of whether Vendor is designated as an FPPC Filer,
Vendor further warrants and represents That Vendor will
immediately advise the City Attorney of City if Vendor learns of
an economic interest of Vendor's which may result in a conflict
of interest for the purpose of the Fair Political Practices Act,
and regulations promulgated thereunder.
F. Specific Warranties Against Economic Interests.
Vendor warrants and represents that neither Vendor, nor
Vendor's immediate family members, nor Vendor's employees or
agents ("Vendor Associates") presently have any interest,
directly or indirectly, whatsoever in any property which may be
the subject matter of the Defined Services, or in any property
within 2 radial miles from the exterior boundaries of any
property which may be the subject matter of the Defined Services,
("Prohibited Interest"), other than as listed in Exhibit A,
Paragraph 15.
Vendor further warrants and represe,~ts that no promise of
future employment, remuneration, consideration, gratuity or other
reward or gain has been made to Vendor IJr Vendor Associates in
connection with Vendor's performance of this Agreement. Vendor
promises to advise City of any such promise that may be made
during the Term of this Agreement, or for 12 months thereafter.
Vendor agrees that Vendor Associates shall not acquire any
such Prohibited Interest within the Term of this Agreement, or
for 12 months after the expiration of this Agreement, except with
the written permission of City.
Vendor may not conduct or solicit any business for any party
to this Agreement, or for any third parcy which may be in
conflict with Vendor's responsibilities under this Agreement,
except with the written permission of City.
VII. Hold Harmless
Vendor shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City,
its elected and appointed officers and employees, from and
against all claims for damages, liability, cost and expense
(including without limitation attorneys' fees) arising out of the
conduct of the Vendor, or any agent or employee, subcontractors,
or others in connection with the execution of the work covered by
? /.2.
this Agreement, except only for those claims ar~s~ng from the
sole negligence or sole willful conduct of the City, its
officers, or employees. Vendor's indemnification shall include
any and all costs, expenses, attorneys' fees and liability
incurred by the City, its officers, agents, or employees in
defending against such claims, whether the same proceed to
judgment or not. Further, Vendor at its own expense shall, upon
written request by the City, defend any such suit or action
brought against the City, its officers, agents, or employees.
Vendors' indemnification of City shall not be limited by any
prior or subsequent declaration by the Vendor.
VIII. Termination of Agreement for Cause
If, through any cause, Vendor shall fail to fulfill in a
timely and proper manner Vendor's obligations under this
Agreement, or if Vendor shall violate any of the covenants,
agreements or stipulations of this Agreement, City shall have the
right to terminate this Agreement by giving written notice to
Vendor of such termination and specifying the effective date
thereof at least five (5) days before the effective date of such
termination. In that event, all finished or unfinished documents,
data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, reports and other
materials prepared by Vendor shall, at the option of the City,
become the property of the City, and Vendor shall be entitled to
receive just and equitable compensation for any work
satisfactorily completed on such documents and other materials up
to the effective date of Notice of Termination, not to exceed the
amounts payable hereunder, and less any damages caused City by
Vendor's breach.
IX. Errors and Omissions
In the event that the City Administrator determines that the
Vendors' negligence, errors, or omissions in the performance of
work under this Agreement has resulted in expense to City greater
than would have resulted if there were no such negligence,
errors, omissions, Vendor shall reimburse City for any additional
expenses incurred by the City. Nothing herein is intended to
limit City's rights under other provisions of this agreement.
X. Termination of Agreement for Convenience of City
City may terminate this Agreement at any time and for any
reason, by giving specific written notice to Vendor of such
termination and specifying the effective date thereof, at least
thirty (30) days before the effective date of such termination.
In that event, all finished and unfinished documents and other
materials described hereinabove shall, at the option of the City,
become City's sole and exclusive property. If the Agreement is
terminated by City as provided in this paragraph, Vendor shall be
entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any
satisfactory work completed on such documents and other materials
to the effective date of such termination. Vendor hereby
?-/:J
expressly waives any and all claims for damages or compensation
arising under this Agreement except as set forth herein.
XI. Assignability
The services of Vendor are personal to the City, and Vendor
shall not assign any interest in this Agreement, and shall not
transfer any interest in the same (whether by assignment or
novation), without prior written consent of City, which City may
not unreasonably deny.
XII. Ownership and Use of Equipment and Materials
All equipment, data, statistics, forms, designs, plans,
procedures, software, documentation, systems and any other
materials or properties covered under this Agreement shall be the
sole and exclusive property of City. City shall have unrestricted
authority to sell or otherwise dispose of all said items.
XIII. Independent Contractor
City is interested only in the results obtained and Vendor
shall perform as an independent contractor with sole control of
the manner and means of performing the services required under
this Agreement. City maintains the right only to reject or
accept Vendor's work products. Vendor and any of the Vendor's
agents, employees or representatives are, fqr all purposes under
this Agreement, an independent contractor and shall not be deemed
to be an employee of City, and none of them shall be entitled to
any benefits to which City employees are entitled including but
not limited to, overtime, retirement benefits, worker's
compensation benefits, injury leave or other leave benefits.
XIV.
Administrative Claims Requirements and Procedures
No suit or arbitration shall be brought arising out of this
agreement, against the City unless a claim has first been
presented in writing and filed with the City and acted upon by
the City in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter
1.34 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, as same may from time to
time be amended, the provisions of which are incorporated by this
reference as if fully set forth herein, and such policies and
procedures used by the City in the implementation of same.
Upon request by City, Vendor shall meet and confer in good
faith with City for the purpose of resolving any dispute over the
terms of this Agreement.
XV. Attorney's Fees
Should a dispute ar1s1ng out of this Agreement result in
litigation, it is agreed that the prevailing party shall be
entitled to recover all reasonable costs incurred in the defense
of the claim, including costs and attorney's fees.
?,ILj
XVI. Statement of Costs
In the event that Vendor prepares a report or document, or
participates in the preparation of a report or document in
performing the Defined Services, Vendor shall include, or cause
the inclusion of, in said report or document, a statement of the
numbers and cost in dollar amounts of all contracts and
subcontracts relating to the preparation of the report or
document.
XVII. Miscellaneous
A. Vendor not authorized to Represent City
Unless specifically authorized in writing by City, Vendor
shall have no authority to act as City's agent to bind City to
any contractual agreements whatsoever.
B. Vendor is Real Estate Broker and/or Salesman
If the box on Exhibit A, Paragraph 16 is marked, the Vendor
and/or their principals is/are licensed with the State of
California or some other state as a licensed real estate broker
or salesperson. Otherwise, Vendor represents that neither
Vendor, nor their principals are licensed real estate brokers or
salespersons.
C. Notices
All notices, demands or requests provided for or permitted
to be given pursuant to this Agreement must be in writing. All
notices, demands and requests to be sent to any party shall be
deemed to have been properly given or served if personally served
or deposited in the United States mail, addressed to such party,
postage prepaid, registered or certified, with return receipt
requested, at the addresses identified herein as the places of
business for each of the designated parties.
D. Entire Agreement
This Agreement, together with any other written document
referred to or contemplated herein, embody the entire Agreement
and understanding between the parties relating to the subject
matter hereof. Neither this Agreement nor any provision hereof
may be amended, modified, waived or discharged except by an
instrument in writing executed by the party against which
enforcement of such amendment, waiver or discharge is sought.
E. Capacity of Parties
Each signatory and party hereto hereby warrants and
represents to the other party that it has legal authority and
capacity and direction from its principal to enter into this
Agreement, and that all resolutions or other actions have been
~if
taken so as to enable it to enter into this Agreement.
F. Governing Law/Venue
This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of California. Any action
arising under or relating to this Agreement shall be brought only
in the federal or state courts located in San Diego County, State
of California, and if applicable, the City of Chula Vista, or as
close thereto as possible. Venue for this Agreement, and
performance hereunder, shall be the City of Chula Vista.
[end of page. next page is signature page.]
?~~
Signature Page
to
Agreement between City of Chula Vista and ATEL Communications,
Inc.
for Purchase, Installation and Implementation of a Voice
Processing System
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Vendor have executed this
Agreement thereby indicating that they have read and understood
same, and indicate their full and complete consent to its terms:
By:
S
Exhibit List to Agreement
(X) Exhibit A.
Exhibit B:
7--17/1-/8
Exhibit A
to
Agreement between
City of Chula Vista
and
ATEL Communications, Inc.
I. Effective Date of Agreement:
II. City-Related Entity:
(X) City of Chula Vista, a municipal chartered corporation
of the State of California
Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista, a
political subdivision of the State of California
Industrial Development Authority of the City of Chula
Vista, a
Other:
[insert business form]
, a
("City")
III. Place of Business for City:
City of Chula Vista,
276 Fourth Avenue,
Chula Vista, CA 91910
IV. Vendor: ATEL Communications, Inc.
V. Business Form of Vendor:
( ) Sole Proprietorship
( ) Partnership
(X) Corporation
VI. Place of Business, Telephone and Fax Number of Vendor:
ATEL Communications, Inc.
5450 Complex Street, Suite # 312
San Diego, CA 92123
Voice Phone (619) 569-7002
Fax phone (619) 569-0081
VII. General Duties:
Install, configure and implement a Voice Processing System
which interfaces with the existing NEAX NEC 2400 PBX
Telephone System.
VIII. Scope of Work and Schedule:
7~1
k. Detailed Scope of Work:
Provide and install any electrical outlets (if necessary)
for the Model 10 Voice Processing System utilizing the
existing UPS/Emergency Electrical Power Source in the PBX
Switch room.
Install Voice Processing Equipment
AVT Model 10 386 Computer which includes but is not
limited to:
24 Available Voice processing Ports ((3\ 8-port or
(6) 4-port Dialogic Cards]
42 Hours Available Voice Storage - IDE Disk
Drive(s)
(1) 3.5" 1.44 MB Floppy Drive
Internal Modem - 2400 BAUD
386 Motherboard (Intel 80386DX Processor CPU)
. 8 Mb Memory
. 33 MHz Clock speed
Model 10, 300 Watt Power Supply
VGA Video Card
14" VGA Monochrome Monitor
Enhanced-lOl keyboard
OS/2 Operating System Software package Including
Disks and Documentation
ADPCM 24Kbps Signal Processing Capability
(1) Available Serial Port
(1) Available Parallel Port
RJ-14C Telephony Interface
(1) Lot CX3 Software Including Disks and
Documentation
(1) NEC NEAX 2400 PBX Integration Package
All Cabling Interface between Model 10 and NEC
NEAX 2400 PBX system and all punch-down blocks as
necessary
Language Module containing Spanish System Messages
System Performance
System will exhibit at least the capabilities specified
in the Request For Proposal submitted by ATEL
Communications, Inc. and will do so at performance
levels which are reasonably acceptable within the Voice
Processing industry given the current volumes of
telephone traffic activity experienced at the City of
Chula Vista.
The installed system will be fully capable of lighting
the Message Waiting lights on all single line
telephones so equipped whenever undelivered messages
are waiting for that telephone. If a telephone is in
use at the time that the Voice Processing System tries
7"'~d
to light the Message Waiting Light, the light will come
on after the telephone is hung up. If the Message
Waiting light is lit and a telephone user picks up the
hand set without retrieving the messages, the Message
Waiting light will remain lit or be relit after the
hand set is hung up.
The installed system will function in a fully
"Intearated" capacity.
The installed system will recognize the DTMF tones of
all equipment producing industry standard DTMF tones.
Initial Database preparation/configuration
Prepare/Configure and Build initial Database conforming
to the specifications developed by City staff and ATEL
personnel
Initial Database will be configured to provide
Automated Attendant and Voice Mailbox services to
the M.I.S. department which will serve as the Beta
department within the City
Automated Attendant to handle calls arriving
on DID # 691-5001 with rollover to 4015
Calls to be distributed to 10 personnel
and/or their associated Mailboxes
Training
System Administrators/Instructors Training
Three (3) City employees will be trained as System
Administrators and System Use Instructors. The
training (a minimum of three hours of instruction)
and materials provided during the training will be
designed to adequately educate the students in all
standard aspects of the VM system administration
and uses. At the completion of this training
program, the tbree (3) City employees will be able
to adequately train other employees in the day to
day usages of the Voice Processing system and also
to make normal administrative file maintenance
changes. At least one complete set of System
Administration and Usages Documentation will be
given to the City to keep.
System Implementation
The VP system will be implemented in phases over a
period of approximately three (3) months. The number,
size and schedule for each implementation phase will be
7',;J J
determined by City staff. ATEL Communications Inc. will
provide all reasonable technical support during each
implementation phase.
ATEL Communications Inc. will work in a cooperative
spirit with City staff and NEC Business Systems West
(the City's current Telephone System Maintenance
vendor) to successfully resolve all issues regarding
the proper interfacing between the NEC NEAX 2400 PBX
switch and the AVT Voice Processing system.
Turn-Key Installation
Provide, except as stipulated in Exhibit A, Paragraph
10, all other software, hardware, labor, electrical
work, wiring, training and technical expertise to
provide a "Turn-Key" installation and implementation.
Warrantee
The warrantee for the installed system is for a period
of twelve (12) months from the date of acceptance by
the City and will cover all parts (hardware and
software) and labor.
Future Maintenance Agreement
Following the Warrantee period, the City may at its
option, enter into a Maintenance Agreement with ATEL
Con~unication, Inc. covering the installed system. The
co~t of such maintenance will be $ 3,697.11 per year
for the sixty (60) month period commencing on the first
day following the last day of the warrantee period.
B. Date for Commencement of Vendor Services:
(X) Same as Effective Date of Agreement
( ) Other:
C. Dates or Time Limits for Delivery of Deliverables:
D. Date for completion of all Vendor services:
Three 13\ months from the "Effective Date" of Aareement.
IX. Insurance Requirements:
(X)
(X)
(X )
( )
( )
Statutory Worker's Compensation Insurance
Employer's Liability Insurance coverage: $1,000,000.
Commercial General Liability Insurance: $1,000,000.
Errors and Omissions insurance: None Required
(included in Commercial General Liability coverage).
Errors and Omissions Insurance: $250,000 (not included
/'.2.)...
in Commercial General Liability coverage).
(X) Performance Bond equal to 50% of total cost of
installed system.
X. Materials Required to be Supplied by City:
A complete extension list of all voice mail users with
limitations the City would like to place on the mailboxes as
well as information on how the City wishes to handle
incoming calls (i.e. DID calls - Direct In Dial calls,
etc...) .
Eighteen (18) l6LCG cards will be upgraded to l6LCG-B or
higher. One (1) IOOC card will be upgraded to IOOC-A or
higher. A power source(s) capable of simultaneously lighting
the Message Waiting lights of at least 500 telephones will
be installed. Two (2) l6LCQ cards will be installed.
XI. Compensation:
A. (X) Single Fixed Fee Arrangement.
For performance of all of the Defined Services by Vendor as
herein required, City shall pay a single fixed fee in the amounts
and at the times or milestones or for the Deliverables set forth
below:
Single Fixed Fee Amount: S 50.856.02, payable as follows:
Milestone or Event or Deliverable Amount or Percent of Fixed Fee
Execution of Contract 50.00%
Acceptance of and payment for the
installed VP system will be based
on reasonable demonstration (as
determined by City staff) that
the VP system is performing as
represented in the "Proposal For
Voice Processing Equipment,
Installation And Maintenance
Services" signed October 10, 1992
and submitted by ATEL Communications
Inc. to the City of Chula Vista.
50.00%
Payment of S 50.856.02 consists of S 3.322.16 tax which will be
paid by ATEL Communications, Inc. on behalf of the City of Chula
Vista
B. () phased Fixed Fee Arrangement.
?'';';J
For the performance of each phase or portion of the Defined
Services by Vendor as are separately identified below, City shall
pay the fixed fee associated with each phase of Services, in the
amounts and at the times or milestones or Deliverables set forth
. Vendor shall not commence Services under any Phase, and shall
not be entitled to the compensation for a Phase, unless City
shall have issued a notice to proceed to Vendor as to said Phase.
Phase
Fee for Said Phase
3.
$
$
$
1.
2.
C.
( ) Hourly Rate Arrangement
For performance of the Defined Services by Vendor as herein
required, City shall pay Vendor for the productive hours of time
spent by Vendor in the performance of said Services, at the rates
or amounts set forth in the Rate Schedule hereinbelow according
to the following terms and conditions:
1. () Not-to-Exceed Limitation on Time and
Materials Arrangement
Notwithstanding the expenditure by Vendor of time
and materials in excess of said Maximum Compensation
amount, Vendor agrec3 that Vendor will perform all of
the Defined Serviceq herein required of Vendor for
$ including all Materials, and other
"reimburseables" ("Maximum Compensation").
2. () Limitation without Further Authorization on
Time and Materials Arrangement
At such time as Vendor shall have incurred time
and materials equal to
("Authorization Limit"), Vendor shall not be entitled
to any additional compensation without further
authorization issued in writing and approved by the
City. Nothing herein shall preclude Vendor from
providing additional Services at Vendor's own cost and
expense.
Rate Schedule
Category of Employee
of Vendor
Hourly
Name
Rate
7-,,1. '/
( ) Hourly rates may increase by 6% for services
rendered after [month], 19 , if delay in
providing services is caused by City.
XII. Materials Reimbursement Arrangement
For the cost of out of pocket expenses incurred by Vendor in
the performance of services herein req'..Iired, City shall pay
Vendor at the rates or amounts set forth below:
(X) None, the compensation includes all costs.
Cost or Rate
( ) Reports, not to exceed $
( ) Copies, not to exceed $
( ) Travel, not to exceed $
( ) Printing, not to exceed $
( ) postage, not to exceed $
( ) Delivery, not to exceed $
( ) Long Distance Telephone Charges, not to exceed $
( ) Other Actual Identifiable Direct Costs:
XIII. Contract Administrators:
City: Richard L. Nelson, Computer Operations Manager, Police
Building, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910
Vendor: John Wilson, ATEL Communications, Inc., 5450 Complex
Street, Suite * 312, San Diego, CA 92123
XIV. Liquidated Damages Rate: $ 200.00 per day.
XV. Statement of Economic Interests, Vendor Reporting
Categories, per Conflict of Interest Code:
(X) Not Applicable. Not an FPPC Filer.
( ) FPPC Filer
( Category No.1. Investments and sources of
income.
Category No.2. Interests in real property.
( )
( )
Category No.
property and
regulatory,
department.
3. Investments, interest in real
sources of income subject to the
permit or licensing authority of the
/-- .2f'
( ) Category No.4. Investments in business entities
and sources of income which engage in land
development, construction or the acquisition or
sale of real property.
( ) Category No.5. Investments in business entities
and sources of income of the type which, within
the past two years, have contracted with the City
of Chula Vista (Redevelopment Agency) to provide
services, supplies, materials, machinery or
equipment.
( ) Category No.6. Investments in business entities
and sources of income of the type which, within
the past two years, have contracted with the
designated employee's department to provide
services, supplies, materials, machinery or
equipment.
( ) Category No.7. Business positions.
( ) List "Vendor Associates" interests in real property
within 2 radial miles of Project Property, if any:
XVI. () Vendor is Real Estate Broker and/or Salesman
XVII. Permitted Subvendors:
[END OF EXHIBIT A, REMAINDER OF PAGE IS BLANK]
/- :J.. ~
mE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PARTY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Statement of disclosure of certain ownership interests, payments, or campaign contributions, on all matters
which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council, Planning Commission, and all other
official bodies. The following information must be disclosed:
1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the contract, i.e., contractor, subcontractor,
material supplier.
ATEL Carrnunications. Inc.
2. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all
individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership interest
in the partnership.
Steven Handelrran, President
3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is non-profit organization or a trust, list the names of any
person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the
trust.
N/A
4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of the City staff, Boards,
Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months'? Yes_
No 2... If yes, please indicate person(s):
S. Please identify each and every person, including any agents, employees, consultants or independent
contractors who you have assigned to represent you before the City in this matter.
Steven Handelrran, President
John Wilson, General Manager
6. Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggregate, contributed more than $1,000 to a
Councilmember in the current or preceding election period'? Yes _ No ~ If yes, state which
Councilmember(s):
Emilm is defined as: .Any individual, firm, co-partnership, joinz _un, association. socia! chIb, fratet7llJ1 organization,
corporation, mate, trust, neeiver, syndicate, this and any other county, city lI1IIry, flY' m . ipality, district or other po/ilical
subdivision, or any other group or combination acting as a unit. .
(NOTE: Attach additional pages as Decessaty)
Date: February 03, 1993
S'
?....l7
Steven Handelrran for ATEL Camnmications. Inc.
Print or type name of contractor/applicant
[Ilovited: 11/30/90]
[A-113\A:DISCLOSE.TXT)
.
~ 0 :.B B
..
I N
I ..
..
..
~
..
I Ie: ..
_0
...:; i + +
iP 0 :.B B
.... 0: ! ~
I 0...... C>
O. CM '"
.....c-u
-- -
C>K .
..
. ...
... . + +
,. ... :.B
0 ... ! 0 B
... c ..
Z.. K "!.
01" C
... K ..
I ...
"'K .. !
c.. 01
-. ... ..
..c ..
... -... 0 0 ..
.... . ...
- -0 ... .
I i + +
c 0 OB B
.. ... ! .. :.. :
. N " ...
... .. ).. 0
..
.. ! .. 1
I - 01
K ..
c
.. .
CC . ...
~ .. i
....
.. . ..
I .. ... . ..
.. ... + + I -
C "
- ..J J Jj i.
... ... ! 0
C
a. ! ..
c.. - ..
. .. &:: ""
... I ...
:= .. ~i PJ
..
C ..
..: f l!'~ ....
I -:>
..... i U"
... t"
.... + + "i =1
..
I ..: 8:; 1 ....
-... 0 ..~ ~ B .. ......
- ...... ... NO . ..-
UK ..
cc.. ... NO .. .."
..-,. ..:_-
- 0.01 IC .. 0_
..a. ..:.. ....
... ..,. 1 e:
f .. .0
C a.z . .,,-
a... -..
.. C .. ,.-
... ~I
- "
..
. a. . . :0 . o.
C " ~. B "0 ....
i ~ O'~ 0 .
01 00 I@ ..
"!. -0 I!
.. i~
r ~~ - "if
...
,. -
. I ~-
... ".
.. .. .... .... -'"
" 1
... .... ..0
.. ~r ,,"
.. - ! 1
I n " .-
.. ..... '03 !
C e: .. 0'"
...... .... ...1 . .. li."
...... . .. "
.. i~ . .
~ t " .. .. "
... ... -" 1 -
I C " - e: C C ..! .... N
... " - .. .. .. " C>
.. ... -I 0 .. t.. 0 . ....
C " e: .. .. .. " ... ...
.., 0 lee - fi - ... ....
. e:.. . .. ... . . ..
C I Q,. ...- 0 . -
... - - . 0 1 ..
J ... . =' :J L. - 01 I ...
- u C7' . ! - . . ....
.. & '0 ... 5 . C C
.. .. . ... . ... N
... > 01 ... - . - .. l:l
0" . .. .. u
... ,. . z '"
... . . C a. 7--:J. Y u
a... ~ . => . ... .
I . - - ... ~
01.. U - - - - .. .. ..
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
, Item '8""
Meeting Date 2/9/93
ITEM TITLE: Resolution 1~'1t:>' Accepting bids and awarding contract for "East
"H" Street reconstruction from 1-805 to Del Rey Boulevard in the City of
Chula Vista, CA"
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public Works ~/
REVIEWED BY: City Manage~?/ (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No..!J
At 2:00 p.m. on January 20, 1993 in conference room 3 in the Public Services building, the
Director of Public Works received sealed bids for "East "H" Street reconstruction from 1-805 to
Del Rey Boulevard in the City of Chula Vista, CA". The work includes the placement of 1-1/2
inch thick asphalt rubber hot mix overlay, removal of all alligatored pavement areas and
replacement with asphalt concrete, the milling of street pavement in certain areas, signal loops,
traffic control, adjustment of manholes and storm drain cleanouts, adjustment of survey well
monuments, and other miscellaneous work shown on the plans.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council 1) Waive minor irregularity in low bid, lack of
acknowledgement of Addendum #1, and 2) Accept bids and award contract to Sim J. Harris
Company in the amount of $328,900.
BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
Funds for the reconstruction of East H Street from 1-805 to Del Rey Boulevard were included in
the fiscal 1992-93 CIP project budget (STM-303). The project was included in the budget to
eliminate the present pavement failure and minimize future maintenance costs.
This project is similar to other pavement overlay projects the City has constructed in the past
except that a new product is being used for the overlay. The product utilizes asphalt rubber hot
mix for the overlay portion of the project. This asphalt differs from that used in the past, in that
it includes the use of ground rubber from used tires in the mix design. (NOTE: This will be a
requirement on all federally financed projects in a few years.) Studies by CalTrans have shown
that a one inch thickness of this asphalt is equivalent to approximately 2 inches of thickness of
standard asphalt concrete pavement. Since this was a new product to City staff, we did
extensive research and made several trips to review projects in which this new material has
been used. Our visit to local sites and consultation with area engineers verified the excellent
results obtained by using the new material. Since this is a new asphalt mix, the sites we visited
were paved relatively recently (only for two or three years). Therefore, contact was made with
the City of Phoenix, which has been using the asphalt rubber successfully for the past fourteen
years as a chip seal process and three years as Asphalt Rubber Hot Mix Overlay Process. The
?../
Page 2, Item g/
Meeting Date 2/9/93
City of Phoenix is quite pleased with the results. The advantages to the use of the product are
its increased strength and its ability to minimize reflective cracking through to the surface. In
addition, it is basically impervious to water penetration which quite often is the leading cause of
pavement failure.
Bids for construction of this project were received from seven contractors as follows:
1. Sim J. Harris Company. San Diego $ 328,900.00
2. Superior Ready Mix Concrete, L. P. . San Diego 343,167.50
3. R. E. Hazard Contracting Company. San Diego 379,059.00
4. Daily Corporation. California Commercial 379,180.00
Asphalt Corporation, a joint venture. San Diego
5. Granite Construction Company. San Diego 441,538.00
6. Asphalt Inc. . EI Cajon 461,602.50
7. ABC Construction Inc. . San Diego 463,747.00
The low bid by Sim J. Harris Company is below the Engineer's estimate of $462,010 by
$133,110 or 28.8%. The Engineer's estimate was based on prices recently received by the City
of Escondido for their asphalt rubber hot mix which ranged from $60 to $72 a ton. Staff used
$66 a ton in our estimate. The bid received by Sim J. Harris was excellent and was only $48
a ton. That bid item alone was approximately $80,000 less than we had expected. Based on
the expected performance characteristics of the asphalt rubber hot mix compared to conventional
asphalt mix, a price of $48 a ton is outstanding.
Since this is a new product being used by the City, the supplier of the rubber binder used in the
asphalt concrete will supervise both the mixing of the asphalt concrete at the batch plant and
the placement of the asphalt concrete at the project site. The supplier, Manhole Adjusting, Inc.,
has had extensive experience in the placement of asphalt rubber hot mix. Having them
supervise the placement of the overlay in the field will ensure an excellent quality job. The
asphalt concrete unit price bid includes the cost of this supervision.
The specifications required that the low bidder have experience in the placement of large
qualities of asphalt concrete. Sim J. Harris Company has had extensive experience in the
placement of AC overlays and has satisfactorily performed asphalt concrete overlays for the City.
We, therefore, expect the contractor to place this new mix without any difficulty.
The low bid by 8im J. Harris Company did include one minor irregularity. The contractor did not
include with his bid package the acknowledgement of receipt of addendum #1. Contractor had
indicated at the bid meeting that he had not received addendum #1. The addendum included
a clarification in the amount of pavement milling required on the project. The original bid
documents had the amount as 184,50 sq. ft. and the addendum clarified this to be 184,500 sq.
ft. However, 8im J. Harris, in providing their bid used the correct amount of 184,500.
Therefore, their bid was not changed as a result of the addendum. Also the addendum clarified
8'--,)..
Page 3, ItemX
Meeting Date 2/9/93
some items concerning pavement stripping and the quantity of asphalt pavement used for the
level course. Neither of these items reflected any additional cost in Sim J. Harris bid. Attached
is a letter from Sim J. Harris discussing this addendum. The Council by awarding this contract
will be waiving this minor irregularity in the bid.
Attached is a copy of the contractors disclosure statement.
Environmental Status
The City's Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the work involved in this project and
determined that the project is exempt under Section 15302, Class 2 of the California
Environmental Quality Act (reconstruction of existing structure and facility).
FINANCIAL STATEMENT:
The source of funding for this project was gas tax funds. Prevailing wage scales as those
determined by the Director of Industrial Relations, State of California were determined to be
applicable to the work to be done. No special minority or women owned business requirements
were necessary or part of the bid documents.
FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION
1. Contract Amount $328,900.00
2. Contingencies (approx. 10%) 33,100.00
TOTAL FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION "$362,000.00
"NOTE: Staff expenditures have already been encumbered and are
sufficient for construction of this project.
FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION
1. East H Street reconstruction from 1-805 to Del Rey
Boulevard - STM-303 $362,000.00
TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION $362,000.00
FISCAL IMPACT: After construction, only routine City Maintenance amounting mainly to street
sweeping will be required.
WPC F:\home\engin88r\agenda\hstrecon
8"3 / B- 'f
RESOLUTION NO.
1~9~.5'
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING
CONTRACT FOR "EAST "H" STREET RECONSTRUCTION
FROM 1-805 TO DEL REY BOULEVARD IN THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA, CA"
WHEREAS, at 2:00 p.m. on January 20, 1993 in Conference
Room 3 in the Public Services building, the Director of Public
Works received seven sealed bids for "East "H" Street
reconstruction from 1-805 to Del Rey Boulevard in the City of Chula
vista, CA" as follows:
1-
2.
8im J. Harris Company - San Diego
Superior Ready Mix Concrete, L. P.
- San Diego
R. E. Hazard Contracting Company -
San Diego
Daily Corporation - California
Commercial Asphalt Corporation, a
joint venture - San Diego
Granite Construction Company - San
Diego
Asphalt Inc. - El Cajon
ABC Construction Inc. - San Diego
$ 328,900.00
343,167.50
379,059.00
379,180.00
441,538.00
461,602.50
463,747.00
WHEREAS, the low bid by Sim J. Harris Company is below the
Engineer's estimate of .$462,010 by $133,110 or 28.8%; and
WHEREAS, the low bid by Sim J. Harris Company did include one
minor irregularity in that the contractor did not include with his bid
package the acknowledgement of receipt of addendum #1; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends that the Council award this
contract by waiving the minor irregularity in the bid; AND
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
WHEREAS, the City's Environmental Review Coordinator has
reviewed the work involved in the construction and determined that the
project is exempt under section 15302, Class 2 of the California
Environmental Quality Act (reconstruction of existing structure and
facility) .
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city Council of the
City of Chula vista does hereby accept said seven bids for "East "H"
Street reconstruction from 1-805 to Del Rey Boulevard in the City of
Chula vista" and awards the contract to the low bidder, Sim J. Harris
Company, in the amount of $328,900, who has assured the City that he is
a licensed contractor in the State of California.
1 .",
8''' .j}
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the city council does hereby waive
the minor irregularity in the low bid for lack 0 acknowledgment of
Addendum #1.
Presented by
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
F:\bome\attomey\hattccOll.
2
~?
,
3.
"-
5.
/
THE ern' OF eHULA HSTA PARTY DlSCLOSVRl:: S1:.4.1'EMENT
lement of disclosure of certain ownership interests, payments, or campaign contributions, on all matters
hich will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council, Planning Commission, and all other
'icia! bodies. The follo....;ng information must be disclosed:
List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the contract, i.e., contractor,
subcontractor, material supplier.
-:=:" \N\ S. t-\br\\s. C0.JV'v.. {>~
If any person identified pursuant to (]) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all
individuals owning more than ]0% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership
interest in the partnership.
If any person identified pursuant to (]) above is non-profit organization or a trust, list the names
of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or
trustor of the trust.
f00"'v--L
Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of the City staff,
Boards, Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months? Yes_
No.!t.. If yes, please indicate person(s):
Please identify each and e\'ery person, including any agents, employees, consultants or independent
contractors who you have assigned to represent you before the City in this malter.
d"..r\sm9~ ^ M-'C'/\o;..:t'iCM. '1
6. Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggregate, contributed more than $].000 to a
Councilmember in the current or preceding eJection period? Yes _ No.2( If yes, SlUte: \\'hich
Councilmember(s):
P,'r.nn is defined as: "Allyindi,'idlltl/.firm, co.pnrl1lrrship,joillt \'~nlHr~. tlJJocitlllon, socitll cluh./rtl/rrntll orgtllliztl/ioll, rorpomtioll.
l'J/me, nllS', rrcri~'er, s)'lIdicntr, Ihis nnd nil)' olher COOIII)', ciO' (lIId cOllnf7)j Cif)', mUJlicip(1lil)~ distric, or O/lItf po/ificnl suhdu'iJiulI,
or tlll.\' ot"~r [;roup or combintltion (lctillg tlJ (I ullit."
(SOTE: AlIach additional pases a~ ncc~~,~I'Y)
D:II':: \ J II Iq3
-
07/ --n~/?~ /
Signature of conlr:Jctor/applicant
'VQ..~ \:{.. ~u..wl:, I 'J\ ~,?,f\(> ~'1~
Print or type name: of contr:lctor/applicant
'8" 7 I'k,,'nJ I J ';.. '''1)
1\,:' '.\ l)1~nosr.1~"
...=.
~6-93 rUE 15:57
r
SIM J. HARRIS
FAX NO, 619 268 5126
P. 02
, ,
.\~~:~!:~!~! CO.
ASPHALT & UNDERGROUND SPECIALISTS ~
January 25, 1993
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
Public Works Department
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 92012
Attn: City Engineer
Dear Sir:
The following
exceeded 4,000
two years:
is a list of asphalt overlay projects that
tons and that we have completed in the last
"
.
\
1. City of Chu1a Vista
Asphalt Concrete Overlay FY 90{91
Placed 5,970 tons, Completed September 1991
2. City of San Marcos
Asphalt Concrete Overlay Various Locations
Placed 4,755 tons, Completed August 1992
3. City of Carlsbad
1991 - 1992 Overlay
Placed 7,690 tons, Completed April 1992
Please feel free to contact me if you need additional'
information.
At the bid opening it was noted that our proposal did not
include Addendum Number One. At the time of the bid opening
I had not received the addendum in the mail. My proposal
did reflect the quantity clarification for Bid Item Number
Two and I do not take issue with any of the other conditions
and clarifications in the addendum. I am enclosing a signed
copy of the addendum for your records.
Thank you for your consideration.
Christo her Armstrong
Project Estimator
CA/pwl CACTYCV.PWL
P.O. BOX 639069, SAN DIEGO, CA 92163-9069, (61,lll.27~1 I FAX: (619) 277-4517 ~
L.IC W352-A IS"' IS" ~
r
26-93 TUE 15: 57
\
SIM J. HARRIS
FAX NO. 619 268 5126
P.03
,
.
,
File # AX-124
EAST 'H' STREET RECONSTRUCTION
FROM 1.805 TO DEL REY BOULEVARD
IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CA
/"n ~'"
!r~', ~. (.. ~~.. ,
, '.. ..... .\ ,. ..
'"'""... W t~. f,,;,
, ".!..I
,) it I', ..'
"''', .,.' ./ ~ I'
!J, f I~".
".,,'
f"/'
-:,.,./Vr t '.: .....
r".:, !.~~(j~f~') ", "
.I 1.';:1 ',~'().
January 12,1993
ADDENDUM #1
The following changes ere hereby made .ffective es though issued with the bid package.
Chances to Soecifications -
I. Section 2-12 .PAVEMENT STRIPING, MARKING AND RAISED PAVEMENT MARKERS.
shall be replaced. and is to reed as follows:
All details and dimensions for traffic stripes and markings shall conform to the California
Department of Transportation Traffic Manual and Maintenance Manual. Pavement stripes shall
conform to Section 310-5.6 of the Stendard Specifications and these Special Provisions.
Traffic line paint shall be rapid dry conforming to Section 210-1.6.3 and shall contain
reflective material conforming to Saction 210-1.6.5 of the Standard Specifications.
The Contractor shall furnish the necessary control points for all striping and markings, and
shall be responsible for the completeness and accurecy thereof to the satisfaction of the
Engineer.
Spotting shall be completed prior to placing the tack coat. No section of street shall be left
without proper striping for more than 24 hours, or over weekends or holidllYs.
Contractor shall remove and dispose of all raised pavement markers as necessary for the
pavement overlay process.
Contractor shall provide and install blue reflective raised pavement markersadjllcent to fire
hydrant locations per Caltrans Traffic Manual figure 6-48 (TYPICAL FIRE HYDRANT
LOCATION PAVEMENT MARKER).
If for any reason, there will be a period of time after peinting of new striping, during which
public traffic will use all or a portion of any roadway in the project area, the Contractor shall
provide tamporary delineation with .chip seal merkers. (Henberger company, white (one-way,
Type W. and yellow(two-way). Type Y, Temporary Pavement Markers. both types with
reflective strips; or approved equal). These markers shall be either white or yellow, BS
directed by the Public Works Inspector. and shall be at maximum 24-foot centers. The
markers will be placed either on the old lines which have been covered with the teck coat. or
on new lines IBid out by the Contractor, es directed by the Public Works Inspector. The
0"
,c-
.' ... I -26-93 rUE 15: 58
,....
SIM J. HARRIS
FAX NO. 619 268 5126
P.04
furnishing and installing of these markers shall be in addition to any other delineation (cones,
signs, barricades, eto,) which are required for public safety. After Contractor has painted the
new striping, he/sha shall remove and dispose of these markers.
Full compensation for furnishing and installing, and removing temporary pavement markers;
and for removing and disposing of pavement markers, Shall be considered as included in the
lump sum price for .Pavement Striping, Markings and Raised Pavement Markers" and no
separate payment will be made therefor.
Nothing in these Special provisions shall relieve the Contractor from his responsibilities as
provided in Section 7-1.09. .Public Safety,. of the Caltrans Standard Specifications. Section
7-' 0 of the Green Book, or Section 2-14 of these specifications.
Payment of performing all of the work necessary to comply with the plans and these special
provisions is considered included in the contract lump sum price for .pavement Striping and
Marking and Raised Pavement Markers..
2, Add the following to the first paragraph of Dart B on page 23:
The (ARHM) leveling course is approximately 600 tons.
3. Replace the first page of the BID PROPOSAL with the revised page attached to this
addendum.
ACKNOWLEDGED BY;
C2~~~~ J
BIDD RS 51 NATUR
~ k ~__-cd~
, . ROBERT'O SAUCEDO
SENIOR CIVIL ENGINEER/DESIGN
PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT
CITY OFCHULA VISTA
\)...~< \-\. ~a\..)\J.tcls IV,?,
ElIDOERS PRINTED NAME
THIS ADDENDUM MUST BE SIGNED AND SUBMITTED WITH THE BID.
AC;dah
tC:\wp51 \ADDEMOUt.f\'05Pfl,JU;.'
I
C"'/~
,
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
ItemL
Meeting Date 2/9/93
ITEM TITLE: II. Resolution I" 9 i' (, Approving Second Amendment to
Agreement for Engineering Services to prepare the Telegraph Canyon
Sewer Basin Plan between the City of Chula Vista and Willdan
Associates
8.. Resolution I/, 'B'? Approving Second Amendment to Telegraph
Canyon Basin Sewer Monitoring and Gravity Basin Usage Agreement
between the City of Chula Vista and EastLake Development Company.
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public Work~ ~
REVIEWED BY: City Manage1 (4/5ths Vote: Yes_NolO
In compliance with the Telegraph Canyon Basin Sewer Monitoring and Gravity Basin Usage
Agreement between the City and EastLake Development, the City entered into a contract with
Willdan Associates for the Telegraph Canyon Sewer Basin Improvement and Financing Plan
on August 7, 1990. In order to reflect the total wastewater flow into the basin, it is necessary
to amend the plan to incorporate the flows expected to be generated by the recently
approved Kaiser Hospital and Medical Center. The consultant will provide the additional
services related to this amendment at a cost of $5,300.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the resolution approving the second amendments
to the agreements and authorize the Mayor to execute the agreements on behalf of the City.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
The Telegraph Canyon Basin Sewer Monitoring and Gravity Basin Usage Agreement required
that the City hold public hearings and prepare a Telegraph Canyon Road Sewer Basin
Improvement and Financing Plan. That plan was to estimate ultimate sewage flows, provide
a program for required future improvements to the trunk sewer, and establish a fee or other
financing mechanism for flow monitoring and construction of improvements. The City would
then be able to fairly allocate the costs and assure that improvements are constructed before
the capacity of the trunk sewer is exceeded.
On July 24, 1990, the City Council approved the agreement with Willdan Associates for the
preparation of the Sewer Basin Improvement and Financing Plan. This plan has been
completed and was adopted by the City Council on October 13, 1992. The plan determines
required sewer capacity and fees only for developments tributary to the Telegraph Canyon
Basin. On February 25, 1992, City Council approved the first amendment to the Basin Plan
9-/
Page 2, Item q
Meeting Date 2iti93
to incorporate flows pumped into the basin from the EastLake and Salt Creek Ranch
Developments.
An amendment to the EastLake I SPA plan approved June 30,1992 modified the land use
on the northeast and northwest corners of Otay Lakes Road and EastLake Parkway. This
consisted of changing the land use for the East Lake Village Center area to accommodate the
Kaiser Hospital and Medical Center, resulting in an estimated sewage generation increase
of 297 EDU's. This increase in flow will require the construction of additional sewer
improvements. This change needs to be reflected in the Telegraph Canyon Sewer Basin
Plan.
It is, therefore, proposed that the City have the Telegraph Canyon Basin Plan revised to
incorporate the flows generated by the Kaiser Hospital and Medical Center. This work could
be performed by City staff, awarded to a consultant on a competitive basis following a
Request for Proposals, or awarded to Willdan Associates as the second amendment to the
original Agreement for Engineering Services. It is recommended that we award this
amendment to Willdan Associates for the following reasons:
1. Since Willdan Associates prepared the original Telegraph Canyon Study and first
amendment, they have the information and expertise needed to perform the second
amendment.
2. Willdan Associates has the information on gravity basin and pumped flows
computerized and tabulated and they can add the additional flows from the Kaiser
Hospital and Medical Center more efficiently and cost effectively.
Engineering staff has negotiated an agreement with Willdan Associates to provide the needed
engineering services for a total of $5,300. This work will be financed through funds provided
by the EastLake Development Company for preparation of the Telegraph Canyon Basin Plan.
The work to be accomplished by the consultant shall include:
1. Updating the computer model and generating data on required improvements for the
gravity basin including the additional flows from the Kaiser Hospital and Medical
Center (EastLake I SPA Plan Amendment) in Phase II of development.
2. Updating the computer model used in the pumped flows report to include the
additional Kaiser Hospital flows. This model shall include both pumped flows and
flows from the gravity basin.
3. Amending Task No. 6 in the First Amendment to the Agreement for Engineering
Services to include the additional Kaiser Hospital flows.
4. Revising and reviewing the tables and text in the pumped flows report to reflect the
results of adding the flows from Kaiser Hospital.
9..,,2..
Page 3, Item~
Meeting Date 2/9/93
We will also amend the Telegraph Canyon Basin Sewer Monitoring and Usage agreement
with EastLake Development Company to provide for the additional costs associated with the
medical center. These costs include the $5,300 charged by Willdan Associates plus $2,200
for City staff.
FISCAL IMPACT: EastLake Development Company has to date deposited $118,450 of the
$125,000 required by the original agreement and the first amendment. The second
amendment to the agreement with Willdan Associates will cost $5,300 with an estimated staff
expenditure of $2,200. On January 22, 1993, we received a deposit of $7,500 from EastLake
Development for this amendment. After payment of the remainder of the original $125,000
deposit, there will be sufficient funds to complete the existing Basin Plan and the amendment.
All costs will be financed by cash deposited by EastLake. The costs will be eligible for
reimbursement from fees collected from future developments.
RM:ST -002
WPC F:\HOME\ENGINEERIAGENDA\WILLDAN
9--:3
RESOLUTION NO.
I~ '8"t,
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING SECOND AMENDMENT TO
AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES TO PREPARE
THE TELEGRAPH CANYON SEWER BASIN PLAN BETWEEN
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND WILLDAN
ASSOCIATES, AND AUTHORIZING MAYOR TO EXECUTE
SAME
WHEREAS, in compliance with the Telegraph Canyon Basin
Sewer Monitoring and Gravity Basin Usage Agreement between the City
and EastLake Development, the city entered into a contract with
Willdan Associates for the Telegraph Canyon Sewer Basin Improvement
and Financing Plan on August 7, 1990; and
WHEREAS, in order to reflect the total wastewater flow
into the basin, it is necessary to amend the plan to incorporate
the flows expected to be generated by the recently approved Kaiser
Hospital and Medical Center; and
WHEREAS, the consultant will provide the additional
services related to this amendment at a cost of $5,300.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula vista does hereby approve the Second Amendment to
Agreement for Engineering Services to prepare the Telegraph Canyon
Sewer Basin Plan between the city of Chula vista and Willdan
Associates, a copy of which is on file in the office of the city
Clerk.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of
Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said
Second Amendment on behalf of the City of Chula vista.
F:\home\attomey\willdan
Presented by
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
9-4-///19-1.
SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR ENGINEERING
SERVICES BETWEEN CITY OF CHULA VISTA
AND WILLDAN ASSOCIATES
THIS SECOND AGREEMENT, made and entered into this day of ,
1993, by and between the CITY OF CHULA VISTA, a-public corporation,
hereinafter referred to as "City", and WILLDAN ASSOCIATES, a California
Corporation hereinafter referred to as "Consultant", whose address is
6363 Greenwich Drive, suite 250, San Diego, California, 92122-3939,
covers certain professional Engineering services provided to the
Engineering Division of the city of Chula Vista for an Amendment of the
Financing and Improvement Plan for the Telegraph canyon Sewer Basin.
RECITAL
A. WHEREAS, the City and Consultant entered into an agreement
("original Agreement") for the preparation of a Financing and
Improvement Plan for the Telegraph Canyon Sewer Basin (Gravity Basin
Plan), on July 24, 1990.
B. WHEREAS, on February 25, 1992, City approved the "First Amendment"
to the agreement to revise the Gravity Basin Plan to include wastewater
flows pumped into the Telegraph Canyon Sewer Basin. This revised plan
shall here be referred to as the "Pump and Gravity Basin Plan".
C. WHEREAS, since commissioning Consultant to do the Pump and Gravity
Basin Sewer Plan, the Council approved the Kaiser Hospital and Medical
center, a super sewage generator; and,
D. WHEREAS, City now desires to amend the Pump and Gravity Basin Plan
to incorporate the flows anticipated to be generated by the Kaiser
Hospital and Medical Center.
WITNESSETH THAT, in consideration of the recitals and mutual obligation
of the duties as herein expressed, City and Consultant agree as follows:
I. willdan Associates shall amend the Pump and Gravity Basin Plan as
follows:
A. Tasks
1. Update the computer model on the Gravity Basin Plan to include
the flows from Kaiser Hospital and Medical Center in phase ]1 of
development. Analyze flows, generate improvement data, and
determine the threshold development limit (in EDU's) at which
improvements are necessary. Include tabulated results in the Pump
and Gravity Basin Plan.
2. Revise the flows of phase II development in the Pump and
Gravity Basin Plan to include Kaiser Hospital and Medical Center.
Upgrade all tables and calculations affected by this change.
3. Amend task No. 6 of the First Amendment to the original
9 ~ ';J
Agreement for Engineering Services to reflect the addition of the
Kaiser Hospital flows.
4. Revise and review the tables and text in the draft Pump and
Gravity Basin Plan to reflect the results of adding the flows from
Kaiser Hospital.
B. Work Schedule and Submittals
1. The information generated by performing the tasks required by
this Second Amendment shall be incorporated into the Pump and
Gravity Basin Plan prepared under the First Amendment. This second
draft report shall be submitted within twenty one (21) calendar
days after approval of this amendment.
2. A complete final Pump and Gravity Basin Plan based on
completing the tasks required by this Second Amendment shall be
submitted to the City within fourteen (14) calendar days after
receipt of comments on the second draft report.
3. The number of copies shall be the same as specified in the
original Agreement.
II. supplemental compensation
In addition to the compensation provided in the Original Agreement
and as modified by the First Amendment, the compensation to be paid
by the City to Consultant for all the work required for the
additional work specified in this Second Amendment shall be Five
Thousand Three Hundred Dollars ($5,300) payable in monthly progress
payments in an amount that the Public Works Director, or his
designee, shall determine corresponds to the value provided to the
City to the date of billing.
All items in the original contract shall remain unchanged unless
otherwise noted in the present amendment.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CITY and CONSULTANT have executed this Amendment on
this day of , 1993.
(RM\2NDWILDN.AGR)
~
fHE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
Mayor, City of Chula vista
ATTEST:
city Clerk
9~"'I
RESOLUTION NO. 11,98'7
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING SECOND AMENDMENT TO
TELEGRAPH CANYON BASIN SEWER MONITORING AND
GRAVITY BASIN USAGE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA AND EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT
COMPANY, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE
SAME
WHEREAS, it is also necessary to amend the Telegraph
Canyon Basin Sewer Monitoring and Usage agreement with EastLake
Development Company to provide for the additional costs associated
with the medical center which costs include the $5,300 charged by
Willdan Associates plus $2,200 for city staff.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city Council of
the City of Chula vista does hereby approve the Second Amendment to
Telegraph Canyon Basin Sewer Monitoring and Gravity Basin Usage
Agreement between the City of Chula vista and EastLake Development
Company.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the city of
Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said
Second Amendment on behalf of the City of Chula vista.
F:\home\attomey\TCBaain.2nd
ity
Presented by
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
'1{J.;/ /fj~-t
SECOND AMENDMENT TO TELEGRAPH CANYON BASIN
SEWER MONITORING AND GRAVITY BASIN
USAGE AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND
EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
THIS SECOND AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT, is made and entered into this
day of , 1993, by and between the CITY
OF CHULA VISTA , a municipal corporation, hereinafter referred to
as "City", and EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a partnership
comprised of corporations, hereinafter referred to as "Developer",
whose address is 900 Lane Avenue, Suite 100, Chula Vista,
California 91913.
RECITAL
A. WHEREAS, City and Developer entered into the Telegraph Canyon
Basin Sewer Monitoring and Gravity Basin usage Agreement on January
23, 1990.
B. WHEREAS, on February 25, 1992 city and Developer agreed to
amend the Telegraph Canyon Sewer Basin Improvement and Financing
Plan to incorporate pumped flows generated by Eastlake and Salt
Creek Ranch Developments within the Salt Creek Basin, and Eastlake
Development within the Poggi canyon Basin.
C. WHEREAS, Developer previously agreed to fund the Telegraph
. Canyon Sewer Basin Improvement and Financing Plan (Plan) to a total
of $125,000 which would be subject to reimbursement from fees
established by this plan
D. WHEREAS, On June 30, 1992 city Council approved an amendment
to the Eastlake I SPA Plan to accommodate Kaiser Hospital and
Medical Center.
E.
with
with
WHEREAS, Developer was required to pay all
revising the Plan to include the additional
the Medical Center.
costs associated
flows associated
F. WHEREAS, the City desires to amend the Plan to incorporate the
flows anticipated to be generated by the recently approved Kaiser
Hospital and Medical Center.
G. WHEREAS, the total additional consultant and staff costs of
this additional work is estimated to be no more than $7,500.
WITNESSETH THAT, in consideration of the recitals and mutual
obligations and duties as herein expressed, City and Consultant
agree as follows:
I. Amend SECTION 7 (b) of the original Agreement by adding the
following after the existing text:
The Basin Plan shall consist of two documents. The first
document will consider only gravity flows from within the
98--J
Teleqraph canyon Basin. The second document will include all
proposed out-of-basin or pumped flows. These documents will
be modified to include the additional flows aenerated bv the
Kaiser HosDital and Medical Center.
II. Amend SECTION 7 (d) of the oriqinal Aqreement to read as
follows:
(d) The final Basin Plan and its Financinq Plan shall be
prepared vi~ftiB 12 .BR~ftS sf 'Efie armi-.~erBal'Y sf 'khs euee\i:tiefl
. sf ~kis Jl.gre_eft~ by Beseeer 31, 1992 March 31. 1993.
Developer aqrees to fund the Basin Plan study required
hereinabove, subject to reimbursement from fees or other funds
available to the city. Eastlake's fundinq of the Basin Plan
studies, however, shall not exceed Ofte 'Ihiftarea TksliSafta
Bellara ($199, see) One lI\:u\Elrea ~-epl'ty Fi-le 'PkSlilSaftB BellaI'D
(~125,999) One Hundred Thirtv TWo Thousand Five Hundred
Dollars ($132.500\ without Eastlake's review and approval of
any proposed costs in excess of such funds by Developer. Both
city and Developer shall jointly review and consent to the
hirinq of outside consultants to prepare the Basin Plan and
prepare a Financinq Plan. Developer shall have placed the
total ~125,999 $132.500 on deposit with the City within 30
days of the execution of this Second Amendment to Aqreement.
aRB ~rier ~e ~fte iSSU8ftee sf ~he Matias ~e Pressed fer ~hc
First l~eRdmeRt ~e ^greemeftt fer Eft,iReerin, &er~ieee setweefl
ei~y sf Cftlila Vis~a afta Willaaft Jl.ssssia~es. The amount of any
reimbursement due to Eastlake shall be determined in
conjunction with the City's determination of the financial
responsibility of each benefitted property owner for various
sewer system improvements.
Except as modified herein, all other items and conditions of the
oriqinal aqreement remain as specified therein.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CITY and DEVELOPER have executed this Amendment
on this day of , 1993.
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
(RM\EALK2ND.AGR)
Mayor, City of Chula vista
ATTEST:
City Clerk
98'0/
COUNCil AGENDA STATEMENT
Item I/)
Meeting Date 2/9/93
ITEM TITLE:
Resolution I/"~ Transferring funds, accepting bids and
awarding contracts for the reroofing of Loma Verde Recreation
Center (Phases I and II) and the Police Department building in the
City of Chula Vis..ta, califOrnij
Director of Public Works ~
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY: City ManagefJ'
(4/5ths Vote: Yes~No--.J
At 2:00 p.m. on December 23, 1992, in the Public Services Building, the Director of Public
Works received sealed bids for the reroofing of Loma Verde Recreation Center (Phases
I and II) and the Police Department building in the City of Chula Vista, California.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council:
1. Transfer $43,550 from CIP Project GG-102 - Remodeling Public Services
Building and appropriate to CI P Program GG-122 - Roof repairs Loma
Verde Recreation Center.
2. Transfer $26,830 from CIP Project GG-102 - Remodeling - Public Service
Building and appropriate to CIP Project PS-122 - Reroofing flat areas -
Police Department Account.
3. Accept bids and award contract to La Quinta Roofing Inc., San Diego in the
amount of $54,542 for the roof repairs Loma Verde Recreation Center (CIP
GG-122).
4. Accept bids and award contract to Nelson Roof Inc., Escondido in the
amount of $24,389 for the reroofing of the Police Department building (CIP
PS-122).
BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
Loma Verde Recreation Center
The reroofing of the Loma Verde Recreation Center was budgeted as a two phase project
in the FY 1989-90 CIP. The first phase, which involves the reroofing of the east portion
of the building was funded in the FY 1989-90 budget. The second phase, which involves
the reroofing of the west portion of the building was proposed for funding in FY 1993-94.
/p,!
Page 2, Item I/J
Meeting Date 2/9/93
During the preparation of the Phase I contract specifications, staff decided to combine
both phases and bid them concurrently to:
1. Eliminate responsibility problems usually arising from liability for correcting
leakages at the joint of two different roofs.
2. Enable one contractor to take full responsibility for quality of work.
3. Take advantage of cost savings associated with duplication of administrative costs,
and
4. Take advantage of current market conditions.
The bids received for Loma Verde Recreation Center reroofing were excellent. It is,
therefore, recommended that both phases be awarded at this time, since this would result
in estimated savings of about $24,660 for this portion.
Police Department Buildina
The project involves the reroofing of the leaking sections of the built-up roof and gravel
areas of the Police Department building.
The reroofing of the Police Department was approved in the 1991-92 CIP and was funded
to utilize Development Impact Fee (DIF) funds. Further evaluation, however, has
determined that the project is classified as a maintenance item and does not qualify for
the DIF funding. Therefore, funds must be appropriated from another source. The
recommended source of funds for this project are funds originally appropriated for the
remodeling of the Public Services Building in FY 1984-85 and FY 1987-88. The need to
immediately remodel the Public Services Building was mitigated by the relocation of the
Community Development a few years ago. It is, therefore, recommended that these
funds be used for the reroofing project.
Bid Results
Both projects were advertised for a period of four weeks beginning November 21, 1992.
During this period plans were purchased by 15 contractors and on the bid opening date,
bids were submitted by 6 contractors (Loma Verde Recreation Center) and 7 contractors
(Police Department Building). The bids received are as follows:
//).,~
Page 3, Item //1
Meeting Date 2/9/93
I LOMA VERDE RECREATION CENTER (GG-122) I
I CONTRACTOR ~ Bid Amount I
Total Bid
1. La Quinta Roofing Inc., San Diego $54,542.00
2. J.P. Witherow Roofing Co., San Diego $56,600.00
3. Stricker Roofing Inc., Escondido $58,251.00
4. Adams Builders Inc., Chula Vista $63,870.00
5. Roejack Roofing Inc., San Diego $75,770.00
6. Commercial and Industrial Roofing Inc., Escondido $76,894.00
I POLICE DEPARTMENT BUILDING (PS-122) I
I CONTRACTOR II BID AMOUNT I
1. Nelson Roof Inc., San Diego . $24,389.00
2. La Quinta Roofing Co., San Diego $27,040.00
3. J. P. Witherow Roofing Co., San Diego $31,630.00
4. Stricker Roofing Inc., Escondido $33,947.00
5. Roejack Roofing Inc., San Diego $37,193.00
6. Adams Builders Inc., Chula Vista $42,890.00
7. Commercial and Industrial Roofing Inc., $43,710.00
Escondido
The low bid by La Quinta Roofing Co. for the Loma Verde Recreation Center is below the
staff's estimate of $55,000 by $458.00 or by 0.8%. Staff has reviewed the bid and
conducted a past performance evaluation and determined that the contractor has done
similar projects and has the resources to complete the job. Staff recommends awarding
the contract for the reroofing of Loma Verde Recreation Center to La Quinta Roofing Co.
The low bid by Nelson Roof Inc. for the Police Department building is below the staff's
estimate of $30,000 by $5,611 or by 18.7%. Staff has reviewed this low bid and
conducted a past performance evaluation and determined that Nelson Roof Inc. has
available resources to complete the job and that the Company is in good standing. Staff
recommends awarding the contract for the reroofing of the Police Department building to
Nelson Roof Inc.
11/:3
Page 4, Item I tJ
.Meeting Date 2/9/93
Disclosure Statement
The disclosure statements of both contractors are attached herewith.
Environmental Status
The City's Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the work involved in the
reroofing of the Loma Verde Recreation Center and the Police Department Building and
determined that the projects are exempt under Section 15301, class 1 of the California
Environmental Quality Act (repair or maintenance of existing public structures).
FISCAL IMPACT: If the resolution is adopted, the following table represents the funding
status of the projects.
I ROOF REPAIRS LOMA VERDE RECREATION CENTER (GG-122) I
FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION
A. Contract Amount $54,542.00
B. Contingencies (approximately 10%) 5,454.00
C. Staff Cost (approximately 10%) 5.454.00
Total Funds Required for Construction $65,450.00
FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION
A. GG-122 - Roof Repairs Lorna Verde Center Account 21,900.00
B. Appropriation from GG-102 43.550.00
Total Funds Available for Construction $65,450.00
I REROOF FLAT AREAS. POLICE DEPARTMENT (PS-122) I
FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION
A. Contract Amount $24.389.00
B. Contingencies (approximately 10%) 2.441.00
Total Funds Required for Construction $26.830.00
FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION
A. Transfer of funds from 600-6001-GG-102 - Remodeling Public
Services Building Account to 803-8030-PS-122 - Reroofing of
Flat Areas - Police Department Account $26.830.00
Total Funds Available for Construction $26,830.00
This project would reduce the cost of maintenance since the new roof will be completed.
WPC F:\HOMElENGINEERlAGENDAIREROOF
012793
11/',/
RESOLUTION NO.
II, 9 rr
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA TRANSFERRING FUNDS, ACCEPTING BIDS
AND AWARDING CONTRACTS FOR THE REROOFING OF
LOMA VERDE RECREATION CENTER (PHASES I AND II)
AND THE POLICE DEPARTMENT BUILDING IN THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
WHEREAS, at 2:00 p.m. on December 23, 1992, in the Public
Services Building, the Director of Public Works received sealed
bids for the reroofing of Loma Verde Recreation Center (Phases I
and II) and the Police Department building in the City of Chula
vista, California; and
WHEREAS, the following bids were received:
LOMA VERDE RECREATION CENTER (GG-1221
CONTRACTOR Bid Amount
Total Bid
1. La Ouinta Roofing Inc., San Diego $54,542.00
2. J.P. Witherow Roofing Co., San Diego $56,600.00
3. Stricker Roofing Inc., Escondido $58,251.00
4. Adams Builders Inc., Chula Vista $63,870.00
5. Roejack Roofing Inc., San Diego $75,770.00
6. Commercial and Industrial Roofing Inc., Escondido $76,894.00
I POLICE DEPARTMENT BUILDING IPS-1221 I
I CONTRACTOR II BID AMOUNT I
1. Nelson Roof Inc., San Diego $24,389.00
2. La Ouinta Roofing Co., San Diego $27,040.00
3. J. P. Witherow Roofing Co., San Diego $31,630.00
4. Stricker Roofing Inc., Escondido $33,947.00
5. Roejack Roofing Inc., San Diego $37,193.00
6. Adams Builders Inc., Chula Vista $42,890.00
7. Commercial and Industrial Roofing Inc., $43,710.00
Escondido
1
/tJ-:.5
WHEREAS, the low bid by La Quinta Roofing Co. for the Loma
Verde Recreation Center is below the staff's estimate of $55,000 by
$458.00 or by 0.8% and staff has reviewed the bid and conducted a
past performance evaluation and determined that the contractor has
done similar projects and has the resources to complete the job and
recommends awarding the contract for the reroofing of Loma Verde
Recreation Center to La Quinta Roofing Co.; and
WHEREAS, the low bid by Nelson Roof Inc. for the Police
Department building is below the staff's estimate of $30,000 by
$5,611 or by 18.7% and staff has reviewed this low bid and
conducted a past performance evaluation and determined that Nelson
Roof Inc. has available resources to complete the job and that the
Company is in good standing and recommends awarding the contract
for the reroofing of the Police Department building to Nelson Roof
Inc.; and
WHEREAS, the City's Environmental Review Coordinator has
reviewed the work involved in the reroofing of the Loma Verde
Recreation Center and the Police Department Building and determined
that the projects are exempt under section 15301, Class 1 of the
California Environmental Quality Act (repair or maintenance of
existing public structures).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city Council of the
City of Chula vista does hereby accept bids and award contract to
La Quinta Roofing Inc., San Diego in the amount of $54,542 for the
roof repairs Loma Verde Recreation Center (CIP GG-122).
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the city of
Chula vista does hereby accept bids and award contract to Nelson
Roof Inc., Escondido in the amount of $24,389 for the reroofing of
the Police Department building (CIP PS-122).
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Chula vista does hereby transfer $43,550 from CIP Project GG-102 -
Remodeling Public Services Building to CIP Program GG-122 - Roof
repairs Loma Verde Recreation Center.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Chula vista does hereby transfer $26,830 from CIP Project GG-102 -
Remodeling - Public Service Building to CIP proj ct PS-122
Reroofing flat areas - Police Department Account.
F:bomc\attomcy\reroof
Presented by
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
2
I~-t,
THE Cln OF CHUU HST..4 PARll' DISCLOStJRJ:: Sl:.4l'EMENT
.
J.tatement of disclosure of certain ownership interests, payments, or campaign contributions, on all matters
\"hich will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council, Planning Commission, and all other
"<icial bodies. The follo\\ing information must be disclosed:
1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the contract, i.e., contractor,
subcontractor, material supplier.
LA QUINTA ROOFING, INC.
2. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all
individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership
interest in the partnership.
MARILYN'JOSEPHSON 51 %
MA~ViN JUb~~tibUN ~~ ~
3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is non-profit organization or a trust, list the names
of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or
trustor of the trust.
NONE
Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of the City staff,
Boards, Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months? Yes
No ~x If yes, please indicate person(s):
~. Please identif)' each and ever)' person, including any agents, employees, consultants or independent
contractors who you have assigned to represent you before the City in this mailer.
LA QUINTA ROOFING, INC. MICHAEL M. JOS~~HSUN
6, Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggregate, contributed more than $1,000 to a
Councilmember in the current or preceding election period? Yes _ Nd{2QL If yes, state \\'hi~h
Councilmember(s):
p"",'n is defined as: 'AIIY indMdl/al,jirm, co.par"'~rsilip,joilll l'enll/rC, association, social cll/h,frmU71al o'1:allizmian, corpa/'lltioll,
/,,1111<', mISt, r~U/l'~r, s)'lIdicatc. this and allY oth~r COIlIl1)', cit)' alld COU1III)', cif); mUllicipolif); district or other political suhdmjilJlI,
Dr OilY other grOllp Dr combi1lmio1l octillg os a ullit."
(:o.:OTE: Alt3Ch addilion311':oges 3~ nccc~s~'y)
! \;. '.\ D1SCLOSr. TXT)
Print or type nam
It'.. 7
INC.
plicant
MICHAEL M. JOSEPHSON
Date:
12/23/92
LA QUINTA ROOFING,
Signature
ntractor/applicant
In,,, 1,,~'J II ~ll ',uJ
1'- .
'~';- ,~~_L..L_, _'_'C. -_-..L'.L
l--k...,.L...J I U....
THE CITY OF CHUU. VISTA PARTY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Statement of disclosure of certain ownership interes"ts, paymenu, or campllign contributions, on all mllllers
which will require discretionary action on the part of the City COul'lcil, Planning Commission, and 1111 other
official bodies. The following information must be disclosed:
1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the contract, i.e., contractor,
~i~O;' m~'~~1~1:" f P.<
T ~ ~11/ ~Zo^: -v (~':-'!;e;:e:1J5'
2.
If nny person identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all,
individuals owning more than 10% of tile sllarcs in the corporation or owning nny partnt:rship
Interest In the partnership.
~~~~ e%~7:~AJ
IJJflll!..c.~ c.Ls'o;U
feE-;;'
U. f/eE5
~.:;.C /nei:/l~
I
3.
If any person'ldentified pursuant to (1) above is non-profit organization or II trust, list the names
of IIny person serving as director of the non-profit orgllni~ation or as trustee or beneficial')' Or
trustor of the trust.
/'
/'
/'
"
4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transllcted with any member of tht: City stllff,
BOllrc.ls, Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months'! Yes_
No X rr yes, please indicate person(s):
S. Plense identify each and every person, including any agents, employees, consultants or inc.lependent
contractors who you have assigned to represent )'OU befure the City in this multer.
...----
/'
/
6. Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggregate, contributed more than $1.000 to a
Councllmember in the eurrent or preceding election period? Yes_ No...k. If yes, stllte which
Councilmcmber(s): .
PerS'ln is ucflncd as: "AllY indil:idllnl,jlrm. ro.pnruttrship, 10illl "mlllr,'. nllori(//ion, sotinl tluh, frnltrnnl o'1:nniznlion, tnrporn/ion,
(,Will', flUSI, utei"cr. I)'nditme, Illis nil" Oil)' olh" tOIIll')', (iI)' tllld tUIIIIII)', til)'. n/llllit'imlil)', di.,,' Iher polili",,1 .IiMiI'Isioll,
or (111)' olMr grOllp or tombinntioll lIt/illG nS Ill/nil.'
I, \.111 ,\:OISCI.OSIZ."X'l1
(NOTE: Alloell addltlonnl pngcs os nc\:cSS3I)')
Dat~: 1:>-d"'-'1 P'
RESOLUTION NO. 16988
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA TRANSFERRING FUNDS, ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING
CONTRACTS FOR THE REROOFING OF LOMA VERDE RECREATION
CENTER (PHASES I AND II) AND THE POLICE DEPARTMENT
BUILDING IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
WHEREAS, at 2:00 p.m. on December 23, 1992, in the Public Services
Building, the Director of Public Works received sealed bids for the reroofing of
Lorna Verde Recreation Center (Phases I and II) and the Police Department building
in the City of Chula Vista, California; and,
WHEREAS, the following bids were received:
I LOMA VERDE RECREATION CENTER (GG-I22) I
CONTRACTOR Bid Amount
Total Bid
1. La Quinta Roofing Inc., San Di ego $54,542.00
2. J.P. Witherow Roofing Co., San Diego $56,600.00
3. Stricker Roofing Inc., Escondido $58,251.00
4. Adams Builders Inc., Chula Vista $63,870.00
5. Roejack Roofing Inc., San Diego $75,770.00
6. Commercial and Industrial Roofing Inc., $76,894.00
Escondido
POLICE DEPARtMENT BUILDING (PS-1Z2)
CONTRACTOR BID AMOUNT
1. Nelson Roof Inc., San Diego $24,389.00
2. La Quinta Roofing Co., San Diego $27,040.00
3. J. P. Witherow Roofing Co., San Diego' $31,630.00
4. Stricker Roofing Inc., Escondido $33,947.00
5. Roejack Roofina Inc., San Diego $37,193.00
6. Adams Builders Inc., Chula Vista $42,890.00
7. Comnercial and Industrial Roofing Inc., $43,710.00
Escondido
Resolution No. 16988
Page 2
~\~?
/, r'
'* . .5". "y."", '1..>-
" ^;;Iv \.:
\. y c.,v ;P
........" ~:/ -~,;
'-' . ./~, ''''
,"'........ ~/
WHEREAS, the low bi d by La Qui nta Roofi ng Co. for the Lorna Verde Recreati on
Center is below the staff's estimate of $55,000 by $458.00 or by 0.8% and staff
has reviewed the bid and conducted a past performance evaluation and determined
that the contractor has done similar projects and has the resources to complete
the job and recommends awarding the contract for the reroofing of Lorna Verde
Recreation Center to La Quinta Roofing Co.; and,
WHEREAS, the low bid by Nelson Roof Inc. for the Police Department building
is below the staff's estimate of $30,000 by $5,611 or by 18.7% and staff has
reviewed this low bid and conducted a past performance evaluation and determined
that Nelson Roof Inc. has available resources to complete the job and that the
Company is in good standi ng and recommends awardi ng the contract for the
reroofing of the Police Department building to Nelson Roof Inc.; and
WHEREAS, the City's Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the work
involved in the reroofing of the Lorna Verde Recreation Center and the Police
Department Building and determined that the projects are exempt under Section
15301, Class 1 of the California Environmental Quality Act (repair or maintenance
of existing public structures).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista does hereby accept bids and award contract to La Quinta Roofing Inc., San
Diego in the amount of $54,542 for the roof repairs Lorna Verde Recreation Center
(CIP GG-122), known as document number C093-021, a copy of which is on file in
the office of the City Clerk.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista
does hereby accept bids and award contract to Nelson Roof Inc., Escondido in the
amount of $24,389 for the reroofing of the Police Department building (CIP PS-
122), known as document number C093-022, a copy of which is on file in the office
of the City Clerk. (Poo-0001-
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City y,funcil of the City of Chula Vista
does hereby transfer $43,550 from CIP Project GG-I02 - Remodeling Public Services
Building~q CIP Program~GG-122 - Roof repairs Lorna Verde Recreation Center.
c,.co-uCO I ~
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista
does hereby transfer $~6,830 from CIP Project GG-I02 - Remodeling - Public
Servi ce Bui 1 di ng to CIP project( PS-122 - Reroofi nJ'fl at areas - Pol ice Department
Account. &CO-(:;w! \&m-f.pOO I
Presented by
/tit ':Y
~!i~
Johll' P. Li ppi tt
Director of Public Works
Bruce M. Boogaa d
City Attorney
RECEIVED
TO:
February 16, 1993
Lyman Christopher, Director of FllaS 16 P4:26
Teri Enos, Principal Management Assistant
Ct 1: CITY OF CHULA VIS T A
Carole French, Accountant ClTY CLERK'S OFFICE
ACCOUNT CORRECTIONS, RESOLUTION 16988
DATE:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
On 2/9/93 Council approved two roofing projects: Loma Verde Recreation
Center and the Police Department. In the A-113 they referenced an
"appropriation of $43,550 from GGl02" for Loma Verde project GG122 and a
transfer of $26,830 from GGl02 to 803-8030-PS122 for the Police
Department project.
Project GGl02 is funded entirely by the general fund and is
appropriated in Dept/Actv 600-6001. The $43,550 for GG122 will result
in a reduction to account 600-600l-GGl02 and a corresponding addition of
$43,550 to a new account 600-600l-GG122.
The $26,830 will not be a transfer from 600-600l-GGI02 to
803-8030-PS122. Finance will reduce account 600-6001-GGI02 and add a
new account, 600-6001-PS122 for the $26,830.
I had previously brought the correction for PS122 to
however I also wanted to clarify how the "appropriation"
be handled.
your attention,
for GG122 would
cc: Pavia Farinas
Lorraine Kraker
Cliff Swanson
Beverly Authelet
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item lL
Meeting Date 2/9/93
SUBMITTED BY:
Report: PCM-93-07 - Reconsideration of changing the name of Otay
Lakes Road between Telegraph Canyon Road and Wueste Road to
Telegraph Canyon Road
Director of Planning 'fJ!!
./l
City ManageV' (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No.lO
ITEM TITLE:
REVIEWED BY:
On January 12, 1993, Council approved changing the name of Otay Lakes Road between
Telegraph Canyon Road and Wueste Road to Telegraph Canyon Road. It was later determined,
however, that the residents of Otay Lakes Lodge Mobile Home Park had not been notified as
originally intended. A letter from staff explaining the change and requesting comments was
subsequently distributed to each resident within the park. Several of the residents have called
and submitted letters opposing the change. As a result, we believe it would be appropriate to
renotice and reconsider the item at the Council meeting on March 2, 1993.
The recommendation to renotice the hearing for March 2, 1993, is due to the fact that many of
the residents are elderly and would probably find it more convenient to attend a 4:00 p.m. rather
than 6:00 p.m. meeting.
Please see attached for a copy of the letter to the residents and an earlier information memo on
this matter.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council direct staff to renotice the hearing on PCM-93-07 for
March 2, 1993.
FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable.
(pcm93-07.Al13)
~Dt..
~~
.
/1- J
COUNCIL INFORMATION MEMO
January 22, 1993
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
VIA: John Goss, City Manager
FROM: Bob Leiter, Director of Planning, fft'c
SUBJECT: Council Action to Rename Otay Lakes Road to Telegraph Canyon Road
The City Council recently held a public hearing to consider renaming Otay Lakes Road to
Telegraph Canyon Road, from the current terminus of Telegraph Canyon Road to Wueste Road.
This name change was approved by the Council.
Although not legally required, it was staffs intent to provide notice of this public hearing to the
residents of the Otay Lakes Lodge Mobile Home Park, which has a street address of Otay Lakes
Road. However, we recently determined that only the mobile home park owner was provided
notice, and that he did not provide notification of the hearing to the residents.
In response to this situation, our staff has contacted the mobile home park manager, who will
be distributing a letter from the Planning Department explaining the recent action, and offering
to discuss the change with any residents. We hope this will resolve any concerns which the park
residents may have regarding this change.
We will keep the Council informed on any issues which may arise in regard to this matter.
cc: Ken Lee, Assistant Planning Director
Steve Griffm, Principal Planner
(otaylake.mem)
11-,)..
~y?-
=~~ ::
--....".....-
......~~~
~- --
CllY OF
CHULA VISTA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
January 21, 1993
Dear Resident:
On January 12, 1993, the Chula vista City Council approved changing
the name of Otay Lakes Road between Telegraph Canyon Road and
Wueste Road to Telegraph Canyon Road (please see attached staff
report anq exhibit). Unfortunately, we later became aware that
only the property owner and not the residents of Otay Lakes Lodge
had been notified by City staff of the proposed change and public
hearings that were held.
We would like to take this belated opportunity to request your
input and comments on the street name change. If there are
objections to the change, we will request that the City Council
reconsider the matter and schedule another public hearing to accept
your written comments and/or public testimony. Each of the
residents of otay Lakes Lodge would receive a written notice of any
such future hearing.
Please direct your questions or comments to me, steve Griffin, at
691-5257, or at the address listed below. If you prefer, Mr. Harry
Brown has kindly agreed to accept written comments on my behalf at
the office.
We would appreciate receiving any.comments yo may have no later
than February 1, 1993.
steve Griffin
Principal Planner
attachments
wp5l\patty\telcnyn.let
)/..J
___?76 FOllFlTH AVEICHULA_VISTA. CALlEORNIA 9191OLI6191 691~51Q1___
,
COUNCil.. AGENDA STATEMENT
,/
Item i
Meetin& Date 1/11/93
ITEM TITLE:
PUBLIC HEARING: PCM-93-Q7: Consideration to change the name of
Otay Lakes Road to Telegraph Canyon Road between the intersection of
Otay Lakes Road and Telegraph Canyon Road to Wueste Road - City
initiated
SUBMITTED BY:
RESOLUTION Approving the street name change for Otay
Lakes Road to Telegraph Canyon Road between the intersection of Otay
Lakes Road and Telegraph Canyon Road to Wueste Road.
Director of Planning ;I)!
REVIEWED BY: City Manager
(4/Sths Vote: Yes_No-X.)
Council Referral #2641
In July 1992, the City Council directed staff to proceed with the renaming of the east/west
segment of Otay Lakes Road (approximately 3.5 miles) to Telegraph Canyon Road.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council:
1) Approve the attached resolution approving the street name change for Otay Lakes Road
to Telegraph Canyon Road; and
2) Direct staff to continue to work with the County to have this name change east of Wueste
Road.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: On December 2, 1992, the Planning
Commission voted unanimously (7-0) recommending that Council approve the street name
change in accordance with Resolution PCM-93-07.
DISCUSSION:
Otay Lakes Road originates at Bonita Road and extends in a southeasterly direction to the
intersection with Telegraph Canyon Rdad, proceeding in an easterly direction for approximately
8 miles ending at Highway 94. Otay Lakes Road makes a right angle turn at Telegraph Canyon
Road and appears visually and physically like an extension of Telegraph Canyon Road rather
than Otay Lakes Road. This alignment causes confusion and problems for motorists unfamiliar
with the area.
/1-1
.
. I
. ..
Paee 2, Item
Meetine Date 1/12/93
The proposed street name change will affect the segment of Olay Lakes Road from Telegraph
Canyon Road to Wueste Road, a distance of approximately 3 1/2 miles (See Exhibit" A"). With
the exception of approJrimately a quarter mile stretch east of Rutgers Road, the entire length of
the roadway proposed for change is located within the City Limits of Chula Vista. The quarter
mile area is the Telegraph Canyon Estates property Which is in the process of being annexed to
the City. The street name change would be in effect at the time of annexation.
There are a limited number of properties with addresses on Otay Lakes Road, the majority being
located within the Olay Lakes Lodge mobilehome park. There also some structures on the Olay
Ranch property which will be affected. These structures are subject to removal upon the
development of the Otay Ranch Project. There are also other properties east of the Olay Lakes
with addresses on Otay Lakes Road. These properties would not be affected by this proposed
change.' Discussions with the County indicated that there is no interest in changing the name in
the unincorporated areas at this time. The failure of the County to rename that portion of Otay
Lakes Road extending east from Wueste Road to Highway 94 could lead to some confusion by
motorists. However, street signs will be installed at the Wueste Road intersection. A letter has
been addressed to the County advising them of the City's intent to rename Otay Lakes Road and
encourage similar action on the part of the County.
The properties with addresses on Olay Lakes Road, including all mobilehome owners in the Otay
Lakes Lodge Mobile Home Park, as well as the major developers that will be affected by this
change, have been notified of the proposed change and the hearing. To date no objections have
been received.
If this name change is approved, there will be a number of signs which will have to be replaced.
The signs are located at the following intersections: Telegraph Canyon Road (2 signs); Rutgers
Road (1 sign); Eastlake Parkway (2 signs); Lane Avenue (1 sign); and, Wueste Road (1 sign).
FISCAL IMPACT: Total cost of sign replacement is estimated at approximately $1,400.00;
these funds are available in the adopted FY 1992-3 operating budget.
(poIII9307 .eel
.'
/)~f'
.L
.
.
. ~
~
~
~
~:ll:
00 c.
~ ~
.
~
-.
..
-
=
. -
.".&==
~
ra.l
-
..
.
.
.
-----
---
"
.
~.
..
"
.
-
.,"'.
\ ~
\
\ . .. -=
. I. I
' \, --~; f"')
J...--' ; ...
----- \ "\ I
~ '\.'~
> I/"~ \\ .~
.,..-
/.
. . -.1"-
~~~~t ~I
~~~ 6~
.
=..
~z
....
~z :r
1lil00 ..
e.Doo
ZecZ.
<Ilil< <
= ....t)
t) ~= ..
Ilil ..:I "" ..
:lDoo<a
<<.
Zf-o~
f-oO..:l
Ilil ulill ~
llil:lf-oZ
.0...
f-o.O -
llCllloo f-o Z
.. Z
t!
I:: <
t
~ ..:I
l ..
i1'YOI OM
EJ
CITY COUNCIL - ITEM # 12
Mavor Pro Tempore Rindone:
Staff wishes to recommend continuance of Council Item #12 TO A DATE AND TIME
CERTAIN, THAT BEING TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 23, 1993 AT 6:00 P.M., COUNCIL
CHAMBERS, PUBLIC SERVICES BUILDING.
.. ~ c'
Chris Salomone
Community Development Director
1/,-1
STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
County of San Diego:
I am a citizen of the United States and a
resident of the County aforesaid; I am over
the age of eighteen years, and not a party to
or interested in the above-entitled maUer. I
am the principal clerk of the printer of the
CHULA VISTA STAR-NEWS, a newspaper of
general circulation, printed and published
TWICE-WEEKLY in the City of Chula Vista,
and the South Bay Judicial District, County of
San Diego, State of California, under the date
of Aug. 8, 1932, Case Number 71752; that the
notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy
(set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has
been published in each regular and entire
issue of said newspaper and not in any sup-
plement thereof on the following dates, to-wit:
1/9
all in 'he year 19.....93..
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that
the foregoing is true and correct.
Dated at
Chula VIsta
California, this ..9........... day of ....Jan....
19.....93...........................
Signature
qulu-'~/
~inciPal ClerK ~
J~'~
Proof of Publication of:
Notice
............................................................................................
........................1 PUB~%~I'b~RING i
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN
THAT A PUBLIC HEARING
Will BE HELD BY THE CITY
COUNCil OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
lor the purpose of considering
Coastal Development Permit
Nos. 63 and 64.
The projects are localed in
the Coastal Zone and are de.
scribed as follows:
Coastal Development
Permit No. 63 10 allow a pri-
vate university to occupy 7.700
sq. h. of existing office space
located at 740 Bay Boulevard
10 conduct college level even-
ing classes; and,
Coastal Development
Permit No. 64 to develop a gall
driving range and baning cage
r9Creationa) complex an ap-
proximately 12.94 acres lo-
cated at the southeast corner
of Broadway and SR-54 Just
north of C Str,*,t (80 North 5th
Avenue).
A copy of the Coastal De-
velopment Permit applications
are on file for inspectIon In the
offica 01 the Community De-
velopment Department.
Initial Studies, IS-93-17 and
IS-91-5O(8), of possible signifi-
cant environmental impacts
has been conducted by the En-
vIronmental Review Coor-
dinator. A finding of no signifi-
cant environmental impact has
b'*'n recommended to the City
Council and Is on file, along
with the Initial Study, in the of-
fice of the Planning Depart-
ment.
Any petitions to be submitted
to the City Coundl must be
received by the Community
Development Department of-
fice no later than 5:00 p.m. one
(1) day prior to the hearing
date. I you wish to challenge
the City's action on this Coastal
Development Permit In court.
you may be limlled to raising
only those Issues you or
someone else raised at the pu-
blic hearing described in this
notice, or in written correspon-
denca delivered to the City
Council at or prior to the public
hearins.
Within ten (10) days fallow-
ing the Coastal Commission's
receipt of the City Coundl's ac-
lion on the above coastal de-
velopment proposal. said ao-
~~7if:~ra ~~~~m~sro~
by a qualified appellate. If the
City Is not notified within the
prescribed time element of a
pending appeal, the City CoUfl.
cil action will be deemed final
and Coastal Development
Permit Issued.
Said public hearing will be
held by the City Council on Fe-
bruary 9. 1993_ The hearing will
be at 6:00 p.m. In the Counal .:::
Chambers, Public Services -
Building. 276 Fourth Avenue,
Chu,a Vista, at which time any
person dl<siring to be, heard
may appear.
DATED: January 4, 1993
Beverly AUlhelet.
C1tyC.lerk
..............,............
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item J;;"
Meeting Date 2/9/93
ITEM TITLE:
PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of Coastal Development Permit
No. 64 to Develop a Golf Driving Range, Batting and Pitching Cages, and
Accessory Uses on Fifth Avenue North of "C" Street.
SUBMITTED BY:
RESOLUTION Adopting Mitigated Negative Declaration
IS-91-50(B) and Addendum Thereto and Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program; and Issuing Coastal Development Permit No. 64 to
Develop a Golf Driving Range, Batting and Pitching Cages, and
Accessory Uses on Fifth Avenue North of "C" Street.
Community DTvelO ent Director ~
City Manager
(4/Sths Vote: Yes No _XJ
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND:
The project involves construction of an athletic and sport recreational center on approximately
nine acres located on Fifth Avenue north of "c" Street within the Inland Parcel of the Local
Coastal Program. The proposed land use currently is not allowed within the Industrial: General
land use designation of the certified Chula Vista Local Coastal Program (LCP). Since the
project site is Industrial: General, a LCP amendment is necessary and is currently being
processed through the City and Coastal Commission.
An Initial Study of environmental impacts was conducted and a Mitigated Negative Declaration
was issued along with an Addendum and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program. A
conditional use/special land use permit will be required as well as a coastal development permit.
It was anticipated that the public review period for the project's environmental documents would
be completed by the end of January to accommodate the joint Agency/City Council public
hearing on the LCP amendment scheduled for February 9, 1993. It now appears that the
environmental public review period will not be complete until late February, therefore, the
Agency/Council hearing will need to be continued.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council continue the public hearing and direct staff to re-notice the public hearing
when a new hearing date has been determined.
cdp64
1;1-1.
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item /.3
Meeting Date 2/9/93
ITEM TITLE:
PUBLIC HEARING: Consideration of Coastal Development Permit
No. 63 to allow National University to occupy space at 740 Bay
Boulevard.
SUBMITTED BY:
RESOLUTION Adopting Negative Declaration 1S-93-l7/l9 and
Addendum thereto; and issuing Coastal Development Permit No. 63 to
allow National University to occup~~ace at 740 Bay Boulevard.
Community fev lopment Director ~
City Manage
j (4/5ths Vote: Yes No ...XJ
()
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND:
The applicant has withdrawn their request in accordance with the attached letter.
RECOMMENDATION:
That the City Council cancel the public hearing since the applicant has withdrawn their coastal
development permit application.
cdp63
13-/
~.JL: /(!,{JA4f/(
THE GREENWALD COMPANY
January 28, 1993
Pamela R. Buchan
Community Development Department
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula vista, CA 91910
RE: Coastal Development Permit
National University
740 Bay Boulevard
Chula Vista, CA
Dear Pam,
Foster Properties may be in the process of selling the above
mentioned property and therefore, hereby withdrawl the Coastal
Development Permit Application for National University to occupy
space at 740 Bay Boulevard.
We will be submitting a subsequent Coastal Development Permit
Application for National University to occupy space at 660 Bay
Boulevard.
If you have any questions, please call me at 427-1900.
Sincerely,
n ,1
elUte .~
Charla Rios
Property Manager
rl~
I;' /
1'1 ,n .
f<.AAJ <--
740 BAY BOULEVARD . CHULA VISTA. CALIFORNIA 91910
TELEPHONE 1619) 427-1900 . FAX (619l 427-1997
13"'~
//
STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
County of San Diego:
I am a citizen of the United States and a
resident of the County aforesaid; I am over
the age of eighteen years, and not a party to
or interested in the above-entitled matter. I
am the principal clerk of the printer of the
CHULA VISTA STAR-NEWS, a newspaper of
general circulation, printed and published
TWICE-WEEKLY in the City of Chula Vista,
and the South Bay Judicial District, County of
San Diego, State of California, under the date
of Aug. 8, 1 932, Case Number 71752; that the
notice, of which the annexed is a printed copy
(set in type not smaller than nonpareil), has
been published in each regular and entire
issue of said newspaper and not in any sup-
plement thereof on the following dates, to-wit:
1/9
all in the year 19......93..
I certify (or declare) under penalty of perjury that
the foregoing is true and correct.
Dated at
ChuIa VIsta
California, this..9 day of.....Jan..............,
19......9.3...........................
Signature
d~l~,oJo
Proof of Publication of:
Notice
............................................................................................
........................j PUB~~~I~~RING
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN
THAT A PUBLIC HEARING
WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
for the purpose of considering-
Coastal Development Permit
Nos. 63 and 64.
The projects are localed in
the Coastal Zone and are de-
scribed as follows:
Co..tal D......lopm.nt
Permit No. 63 10 allow a pri-
vate university 10 occupy 7,700
sq. ft. of existing office space
located at 740 Bay Boulevard
10 conduct college level even.
Ingclasses: and,
Coa.tal Development
Permh No. 64 to develop a golf
driving range and banlng cage
recreational oomplex on ap.
proximately 12.94 acres 10.
cated at the southeast corner
of Broadway and SR.54 just
north of C Street (80 North 5th
Avenue).
A copy of the Coastal De.
velopment Permit applications
are on file for Inspection In the
office of the Community De.
velopment Department.
Initial Studies, IS.93-17 and
IS-91'5O(B), of poSSible signifi.
cant environmental Impacts
has been conducted by the En-
vironmental Review Coor-
dinator. A finding at no signifi-
cant environmental Impact has
been recommended 10 the City
Council and Is on file, along
with the Initial Study,ln the of.
fiee of the Planning Depart.
ment
Any petitions to be submitted
10 the City Council must be
received by the Community
Development Department of.
liee no later than $:00 p.m. one
(1) day prior 10 the hearing
date. I . you wish to challenge
the City's action on this Coastal
Development Permit In court,
you may be limited to raising
only those Issues you or
someone else raised at the pu.
blic hearing described in this
notice, or in wrlnen correspon-
dence delivered to the City
Council at or prior to the public
hearing.
WithIn ten (10) days follow.
ing the Coastal Commission's
receipt of the City Coundl's ac-
tion on the above coastal de.
velopment proposal, said ac-
~~7jf~~fa ~ar:e~m:s~~
by a qualified appellate. If the
CIty Is not notified within the
prescribed time element of a
pending appeal, the ClIy Coun.
ell action will be deemed final
and Coastal Development
Permit ISSU9d.
Said public hearing will be
held by the City Council on Fe.
bruary 9,1993. The hearing will
be at 6;00 p.m. In the Council
Chambers, Public Services -
Building, 276 Fourth Avenue,
Chula Vista, at which time any
person desiring 10 be heard
may appeaL
DATED: January 4, 1993
Beverly Authelet,
City Clerk
..--.,~-~~~ ..".,,~
13,3
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item ft-
Meeting Date 02-09-93
ITEM TITLE:
PUBLIC HEARING: Conditional Use Permit PCC-93-18:
Request to establish an educational facility at 740
Bay Boulevard in the CVP Zone (National University)
- Foster Properties
SUBMITTED BY:
Director of Planning~
City Manager$2 (4/5ths Vote:
Yes_No-L)
REVIEWED BY:
Applicant has submitted a letter dated January 27, 1993 withdrawing
PCC-93-18 (copy attached) .
RECOMMENDATION: That Council accept the withdrawal and not hear
this project.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION: Not applicable.
FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable.
(A1l3 . FORM)
/J/. /
.
,.~
~FROM:GREENWALD COMPANY
TO:CITY OF CHULA VISTA
JAN 27. 1993
4:49PM
P.02
THE GREENWALD COMPANY
January 27, 1993
Mr. Martin Miller
city of Chula Vista
planning Department
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RE: Conditional Use Permit PCC-93-l8
National University, DP978
740 8ay Boulevard
Chula Vista, CA
Dear Mr. Miller,
Foster Properties may be in the process of selling the above
mentioned property and therefore, hereby withdraw 1 the Conditional
Use Permit Application PCC-93-l8 for National university to occupy
space at 740 Bay Boulevard.
We will be submitting a subsequent Conditional Use Permit
Application for National University to occupy space at 660 Bay
Boulevard.
If you have any questions, please call me at 427-1900.
orIY'~/
Charla Rios
Property Manager
740 SAY 60ULEVARD . CHUI..A VIStA. CALIFORNIA 91910 J 'I ,,~
TELEPHONE '6191427-1900 . "AX 16'91 427-1997
CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
REVIEWED BY:
Item Jf
Meeting Date 2/9/93
Resolution I" 981 Authorizing the installation of delineators
as a temporary measure on a portion of the 100 block of "E" Street
Director of Public Works ~
City Manager" (4/5ths Vote: Yes_NolL)
Council Referral #2686
ITEM TITLE:
SUBMITTED BY:
At the City Council meeting of March 27, 1992, a resolution was approved lowering the speed
limit for the 100 block of "E" Street from 35 mph to 30 mph and authorized the installation of a
4' wide painted traffic median on E Street between Second Avenue and Minot Avenue. The
double-double painted median was installed on March 25, 1992, to eliminate left turns across
opposing traffic. Ms. Aguilar, President, Mission Gardens Homeowners Association, requested
additional enforcement of the turn prohibition and speed limit.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council authorize: 1) the installation of delineators (pylons)
as a temporary measure and, 2) instruct staff to submit, for CIP consideration, a project for a
raised median on E Street between Second Avenue and the 100 block of Minot Avenue.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: At the Safety Commission meeting of
December 10, 1992, the Safety Commission voted 5-0-2 with Commissioners Braden and
Matacia absent to recommend to the City Council that a raised asphalt median be installed on
"E" Street between Second Avenue and the 1 00 block of Minot Avenue.
DISCUSSION:
At the City Council meeting of March 27, 1992, a resolution was approved lowering the speed
limit for the 100 block of "E" Street from 35 mph to 30 mph and authorized the installation of a
4' wide painted traffic median on E Street between Second Avenue and Minot Avenue. The
double-double painted median was installed on March 25, 1992, to eliminate left turns across
opposing traffic. Ms. Aguilar, President, Mission Gardens Homeowners Association, requested
additional enforcement of the turn prohibition and speed limit.
During oral communications at the October 20, 1992 City Council meeting, Ms. Aguilar,
President, Mission Gardens Homeowners Association 170 "E" Street, Unit 08, requested
additional enforcement of eastbound speeding vehicles. Ms. Aguilar has also observed vehicles
making illegal left turns across the painted median.
Staff has also observed violations of the painted median, Le., left turns from driveways across
the median and vehicles stopping in the number 1 lane to turn left into driveways. These illegal
left turns across the painted median island have the potential to increase the number of rear-end
accidents of cars stopped to make the left turn. Sideswipe accidents may also increase due to
15'''/
Page 2, Item If
Meeting Date 2/9/93
motorists attempting unsafe lane changes to the right in order to avoid the stopped vehicle. In
fact, one accident attributable to an illegal turn across the painted median has already occurred.
In an effort to mitigate this issue, staff reviewed the situation and presented a report to the
Safety Commission. Further, this segment of roadway has an Average Daily Traffic Count (ADT)
of 19,720 vehicles per day between First Avenue and Second Avenue.
In order to eliminate the illegal left turns, staff evaluated three design alternatives and has also
prepared cost estimates for each: 1) delineators, 2) an asphalt median, 3) concrete median.
The Safety Commission at their December 10,1992 meeting, recommended a raised median.
The Commission did not feel that the plastic tube delineators (pylons) would be acceptable
because they are not permanent, are unsightly, requires constant maintenance and can be
driven over. No matter how many delineators are installed, delineators are not as effective in
prohibiting left turns as a raised median.
It is worth noting that asphalt requires some degree of maintenance, therefore, concrete is more
permanent and is a preferred design alternative.
The cost of installing the pylons at 8 ft. spacing intervals is $2,350. The cost for asphalt raised
median is $41,500. The cost for a concrete raised median is $63,500.
In an effort to eliminate illegal left turns across the painted median, staff is recommending that,
when funds are available, a 700 ft. long raised concrete median be installed on "E" Street
between Second Avenue and the 1 00 block of Minot Avenue. Staff believes that in the long run,
a raised median will be more effective than the delineators, because even with delineators at
8 ft. spacings, small vehicles and motorcycles can still maneuver between the delineators and
the sag vertical curve does not provide adequate sight distance for motorists to avoid vehicles
making these illegal turns. A raised median provides a positive visual channelization device and
physical barrier which motorists recognize. Thus, the motorist does not attempt the illegal tum
across the roadway centerline. Staff, therefore, recommends delineators as a temporary
measure only until funds for the median construction are available.
Speed surveys taken before and after the reduction in speed limit (35 mph to 30 mph) on March
25,1992 do not register a significant change in the 85th percentile speed: 8-4-89, 39 mph; 1-13-
92,38 mph; 4-2-92, 39 mph; 10-22-92, 39 mph; 11-12-92, 39 mph.
The City of Chula Vista accident records show one reported accident on August 15, 1992 since
the above stated changes were made in March of 1992. This accident resulted when a vehicle
exited from a driveway making an illegal turn across the painted median and was broadsided
by another vehicle traveling westbound within the speed limit. Staff and area residents still see
some vehicles making the illegal left turn in this area.
The Traffic Bureau of the Chula Vista Police Department has been providing additional speed
enforcement in this area. The week of November 9, 1992, the SMART unit was placed in the
/.Y.1
Page 3, Item I>
Meeting Date 2/9/93
100 block of "E" Street to alert motorists of their prevailing speeds. Staff will continue to monitor
and enforce the speed limit on this section of roadway.
Funds are available for temporary traffic (pylons) delineators, but not for the permanent
installation. Recognizing the Safety Commission preference for a permanent installation (raised
island), staff recommends that $2,350 from the Special Contractual Services Account be used
to obtain and install the delineators as a temporary measure and consider the raised median a
high priority safety improvement project when the 1993-94 Capital Improvement Program is
presented for approval.
All residents on E Street between Second Avenue and the 100 block of Minot Avenue have been
notified of tonight's City Council meeting.
FISCAL IMPACT: Funds for the temporary delineators ($2,350) are available within Public
Works Operating budget. Since the delineators are 100% Gas Tax eligible, there is a zero net
impact on the General Fund. Staff has prepared cost estimates for both asphalt and concrete
raised medians. If the City Council directs staff to submit these projects for CIP consideration,
the costs are estimated at $41,500 and $63,500, respectively.
Attachment: Area Plat
City Council minutes dated 1/21/92 & 3/17/92 NOT SCANNED
Draft Safety Commission minutes (excerpt) dated 12/10/92 NOT SCANNED
FXR:FiIe No. CY-029
WPC F:\home\engineer\agenda\est.med
1..>::1/15'1/
RESOLUTION NO.
1f,98't'f
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING THE INSTALLATION OF
DELINEATORS AS A TEMPORARY MEASURE ON A
PORTION OF THE 100 BLOCK OF "E" STREET
WHEREAS, at the City Council meeting of March 27, 1992,
a resolution was approved lowering the speed limit for the 100
block of "E" Street from 35 mph to 30 mph and authorized the
installation of a 4' wide painted traffic median on E Street
between Second Avenue and Minot Avenue; and
WHEREAS, the double-double painted median was installed
on March 25, 1992 to eliminate left turns across opposing traffic;
and
WHEREAS, staff believes that additional enforcement of
the turn prohibition and speed limit; and
WHEREAS, the Safety Commission, at its meeting of
December 10, 1992, voted 5-0-2 wi th commissioners Braden and
Matacia absent to recommend to the City Council that a raised
asphalt median be installed on "E" Street between Second Avenue and
the 100 block of Minot Avenue.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula vista does hereby authorize the installation of
delineators as a temporary measure on a portion of the 100 block of
"E" Street.
Bruce M.
Attorney
;r'
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
Presented by
F:\home\attomey\delinatr
15'~
....
. ""lOI
~~E~~ _ <
1 ~C:L · =B-- W
WII_- ~ a:
- -:- <
- = : ;-1": ~' -
- ~ "" -f ': rro ·
"" '.1..L...J.t.. , .. , u.,
, ........ -.nN'JAY , GHO:) - ,
~ "II ~'_ '~ !t', ~ J. I :;: =l
..~. ~ .......
e ~.' - · T.. - -, I !
e """""'_ _'" n. ' i
-: - . '; Iii::: .~ -' t ~
. ~l ~=..'" m'rr .r -. S
e.' " ~ - 'iirflfl'i "u m' '['="( "'aii
1JJJl:~' ~
, : = II F""' 1:- ~
, ' '0 . " ., 0 IJ II ii i 1IIIIIih I ~
, .A WI ' , . 1IU1111.i.. CD
EO, ',. .iiITT 11fT". ! 11 t- J
.1I11 .-m: ~ il..... ~
1$-6
'. . ,
:1~f111f' ,
, ~ 1 ' 4 '...
.
_Iii . "~.'
~IA{iI .' · ~
,.:.Ai · .' ill .
I~W' ; ~
.... '...-!!
,"I. ~
001 ' '
.
'.""
-
~I l'1.:'.-
" ' - l=
"'1'..., ~ --;;:l'-
i. ......... . -.. """"" ~ ,Ill ,:
..,. c~
, -. -. ..
- l ft~
~...~
. - -:111
~ I~~ ~
'I
I
,
...
I~ ~ ~ ~'
(~'rlf
I
! - I
I '
;a
-
,..
JI.
-'L~
=~,.~
=~
-
- 1/ I
..
.
.
.
· IJ- -
/- -
",,=
~
,
,
I
..
,
(
, , ,
,
.
.'
w
I-
<
...I
0..
~
lOt
i
..
.
Q
Minutes
January 21, 1992
Page 14
(
.e clean air act alternative fuel vehicles. What was being developed was a particular trap for diesel engines
and the traps would significantly cut down on the emission from diesel engines. The longer term answer
would be as we those vehicles were replaced over the next few years, the City would be getting cleaner
burning vehicles.
Mayor Nader asked if the new route schedules Council approved the previous year had been posted around
the City and if those schedules were up-to-date. .
Mr. Gustafson answered yes, staff had distributed that schedule and modifications were made throughout
the year to keep the schedules up-to-date. There were a number of outlets where the schedules were
distributed and were also posted at selected bus stops.
20. RESOLtmON 16383 AU1HORIZlNG 1liE INSrAUATION OF A PAINTIID TRAPPIC MEDIAN ON
"E" STREET BETWEEN FIRST AVENUE AND SECOND AVENUE; AND, ESTABUSHlNG A NO PAlUCING ZONE
ALONG 1liE NORm SIDE OF "Eo STREET BETWEEN SECOND AVENUE AND 1liIRD AVENUE - Area
residents have requested the installation of a two-way left turn lane on the 200 block of"E" Street to improve
traffic flow and safety. Since"E" Street was recently overlaid, staff would like to make striping changes to
the 100 and 200 blocks of "E" Street. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Public
Works)
Cliff Swanson, Deputy Director of Public Works, said there was one minor correction to the staff report, the
second recommendation where it read "prohibiting left turns between First Avenue and the 100 block of
Minot" should read "between Second Avenue and the 100 block of Minot" and that was consistent with item
.Ii on page 3 and the summary.
~undlman Moore asked if there were any objections to what staff was recommending to Council as to
prohibiting parking.
Mr. Swanson answered not that staff knew of.
Barbara Ogel, 266 Second Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910, stated that as long as left turns were allowed on
First and Second she was satisfied.
Eunice D. Thrower, 227 Alpine Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910, stated that the letter she received said
"painting a median island prohibiting left turns between First Avenue and the 100 block" and they were in
the 200 block which meant they would not be able to turn left. But now they learned that they could still
turn left.
Thomas J. Wood, 279 Alpine Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910, stated he too had received a letter and now
learned that what was in the letter had been changed. He wanted to know why they had received the wrong
information.
Mayor Nader asked if the letter sent to residents was included in the council packets.
Mr. Swanson answered no, that the letter sent to residents probably repeated the recommendation as seen
on the agenda statement. He stated that it should be noted that he corrected stafl's recommendation and
that was probably where the error crept in if there was a misunderstanding in that letter.
Robert Lane, 242 Minot Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910, stated he was not opposed to stafl's corrected
.commendation but was opposed to taking parking away from Alpine to Minot.
1>''('"
Minutes
January 21, 1992
Page 15
'.
Leonard Aguillard, 138 Minot Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910, spoke in opposition to staff recommendation.
Laura Graudushus, 111 "E" Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910, asked if there were changes being made between
Minot and First Avenue.
Mr. Swanson stated that no changes were proposed between Minot and First Avenue.
Murphy Stumph, 114"E" Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910, stated he would like to see the speed limit lowered.
Frances Guess, 149 Twin Oak Circle, Chula Vista, CA, spoke in opposition to staff recommendation.
RESOLUTION 16383 AS AMENDED WAS OFFERED BY COUNCLMAN MOORE, reading of the text was
waived, passed and approved to adopt only the part between Second Avenue and Third Avenue with the
remainder being referred bad to staff. Approved 4-0-1 with Councilman Malcolm absent.
BOARD AND COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
None submitted.
ITEMS PUlLED FROM 1HE CONSENT CALENDAR
Items pulled: Sa, 10 & ll. The minutes will reflect the published agenda order.
.
Bec:ause of the lateness of the hour (after 10:30 p.m.) Council took the following vote: MSUC
(Moore,lMa1colm) to continue with Item 11 and the closed session, the balance of agenda to be c:anied over
to the following week.
OTIiER BUSINESS
21. CJ1Y MANAGER'S REPORTrS)
22. MAYOR'S REPORTrSl
23. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilman Moore: Review of Council ticlder file. To be continued to 1128192.
.
I>'i
r;
~
.
c'
.
~.
Minutes
MardI 17, 1992
Pqe9
Mr. Rosenberg answered no.
Councilman Malcolm suggested putting the double double yellow line down seven! huncIrecl feet rather than
the entire block to see if that worked. If there were ItlIl problems then it could be arended the rest of the
way on the block. He was trying to reduce traffic and impact the fewest J11DDber of people.
Mr. Rosenberg said the greatest number of can were turning left at the Youth Ceater and the condominium
project. If left turns were prohibited just at that location it would certainly reduce the risk. That would be
an option staff could exercise and then return to CouIIcil with a report u to whelber or not it was successful
Councilman Rindone said he had a concern with the suggestion because it was a highly traveled street and
that could create more of a safety hazard.
VOTE ON M011ON: 3-2 with COO.......'.....n Malcolm and o-.......'....n Mool'e appoHCl
Mayor Nader suggested that staff monitor the situation periodically and report back to Council if there
appeared to be a hazard.
O-'.......'....n Malcolm eKUIecl at 7:13 p.m.
18. RESOumON 16538 LOWERINGnmSPl!l!DUMlTPOR.nm100~OF"E"lmtEETPROM
3S MPH TO 30 MPH; AND AImiORlZING nm INSTAUAnON OF APAINl'ED TRAPPlC MEDlANBETWllEN
SECOND AVENUE AND nm 100 BLOCK OF MINOT AVENUE. The recent resurfacing of "E" Street between
First Avenue and Third Avetlue provides the opportunity to change the roadway striping between First
Avenue and Second Avenue to enhance traffic safety in the lI1'ea. Staff recommends approval of the
resolution. (Director of Public Works) .
Hal Rosenberg, City Traffic Engineer, presented a video of traveling on "E" Street.
Councilwoman Grasser Horton uked if lowering the speed limit by five mph was in the original
recommendation.
am Swanson, City Engineer, answered that it was not in staffs original recommendation.
Mr. Rosenberg said the original recommendation was to provide a continuous left turn lane but to prohibit
parking on the north side, .
Councilwoman Grasser Horton asked staff what they thought the ramification would be if only the tint part
of the resolution was done and Council waited to see how that -'tee! before doing the second part.
Mr. Swanson stated that staB's initial feeling was that it would probably not solve the problem.
Councilwoman Grasser Horton asked how many accidents there had been in the lut year.
Mr. Swanson answered that in a four Jear period there had been eilhteen.
Mr. Rosenberg said that the actual accident rate, when compared with the state wide awrage for that type
of roadway, was a little higher.
Iy/I)
---------.----
., -- . -~'i4it.....;:.. _
Minutes
March 17, '1992
Page 10
LON 16538 0PPERllD BY CXXJNCIlMAN MOORE, l'
......v....d 4-0-1 wiIh eo......n...... tt.'-hn ..,......
.., _die .. _ ....i-. ~ aIIll
19. RP_c;oumON 16504 APPRDVINGANAGIUlI!MI!NTwrTHllAS'I1.ADDEVIlLOI'UENTOOMPANY
JlEGARI)[NG nIB INTEIUM PIKE STAllON IN 1lAS'I1.AD. The agreement prvvides for m interim Pire
Station No. 6 to be constructed and equipped by EutLake Development Comf"''1Y on Lane AYeDue in the
EastLake Business Center. The agreement preselWI md clarifies the intent of the a:istiog EutLake I SPA
Agreement, Part m: Public Facilities Pinmcing Plan md will enhance the level of fire protection services
in eastern Chula Vista. Target date for opening interim Pire Station No. 6 is 5/10/92. Staff recommends
approval of the resolution. (pire Chief) ("--...... Iram --"'I - 211&192.
(;fto......1m... Malcolm fttUnIed at 7:24 p.m.
RESOLlJ'11ON 16504 0PPERllD BY COUNCIMAN MOORE, reading of die .. - waiftd.
Councilman Malcolm thought it would be difficult for the City to find $700,000 each year to operate the fire
station. It was time for the City to take mother look at the Pire Department md that different options
needed to be looked at. Most of the calls were for medical emergencies, less tbm 5'11t of the calls were for
structural fires. He questioned whether the Fire Department would be better served by having satellite
stations to respond to those medical emergencies but not in a fire truck. He thought the City needed to look
at how they were going to provide fire md medical services in the future md whether more paramedic
outstations should be provided. He suggested the fire department return to Council with some
recommendations.
.yor Nader thought Councilman Malcolm made some good points but felt that there was a commitment
which needed to be fulfilled by providing the interim Pire Station No.6. As a follow up, he proposed having
the fire tighters' input on how the City could more efficiendy provide medical emergency services.
Councilman Malcolm asked the City Attorney if the condition of the tentative map was that EastLake build
a fire station.
City Attorney Boogaard answered that was correct.
Councilman Malcolm said the way he understood it was because they were paying DIF fees they would be
relieved of that condition and asked if they had to do that.
City Attorney Boogaard said the decision to put the fire station into the DIF was made several years ago md
established the policy that those costs would be Ipread to all developments. To change that now would be
a reversal of that policy statement, and could be done legally but it _uld not necessarily be fair.
Councilman Moore asked if the City could not afford to build a new fire station andltaff it on m annual
basis and if it was because of how the money was being used from the income from the east or was it
because the income from the east was not enough.
John Goss, City Manager, said the problem with the owrall budl[et had to do with the basic problems with
revenue structures of municipalities, it had nothing to do with the new development. In reviewing marerws
. presented by staff he was convinced that the new development would pay for the new facility md their
operations.
.yor Nader said they would want to review that in more detail at budget time.
15"1/
.---
,
. .1
,.-
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CHULA VISTA SAFETY COMMISSION
Thursday, December 10, 1992
, 7:03 p.m.
Council Chambers
Public Services Building
CALL TO ORDER
1. Roll Call:
Present:
Chair Thomas, Vice Chair Padilla, Commissioners Chidester, Koester,
and Pitts
Excused Absence:
Commissioners Braden and Matacia
Also Present:
Hal Rosenberg, Traffic Engineer; Frank Rivera, Associate Traffic
Engineer; Sgt. Tom Schaefer, Police Sergeant; Shirley Buxton,
Recording Secretary
2. Pledoe of Alleeiance/Silent Praver
3.
Ooenine Statement
Read by Chair Thomas
4. Aooroval of Minutes August 13, 1992 and November 12, 1992
August 13, 1992 . No action taken.
,-,
MSC (Koester/Chidesterl to approve the Safety Commission Minutes of November 12, 1992 as
presented. Approved 4.0.2.1 with Vice Chair Padilla abstaining and Commissioners Braden and
Matacia absent.
MEETING AGENDA
5. REPORT on Traffic Concerns for 100 block of E Street
Frank Rivera presented staff's report.
Chair Thomas asked if the delineators mentioned in the report were the same delineators being used
in the Country Club area.
Frank Rivera said they were the same delineators.
Chair Thomas if the B' spacing between delineators would be adequate.
Hal Rosenberg said they had found the 8' spacing satisfactory, but if there were any problems,
delineators could be spaced closer together.
Vice Chair Padilla asked the fiscal impact was of the painted median.
Frank Rivera said the cost for the painted median was approximately $300.
MSC (Thomas/Pitts I the Safety Commission recommend to the City Council that a raised asphalt
median be installed on E Street between Second Avenue and the 100 block of Minot Avenue.
Approved 5-0-2 with Commissioners Braden and Matacia absent.
6. REPORT on Request for an All-Way Stop at E. Naples Street and Foxboro Avenue
Frank Rivera presented staff's report. Mr. Rivera added that new traffic counts were just completed
and the interS{j;;~1 ;;~ ~:e;~ war;:;~~e~ar; ~n;1I an all~i~
l
lo
'.
.
.
February 3, 1993
MEMO TO:
FROM:
The Honorable City Council
Councilman Bob FO~
ENVIRONMENTAL ENTERPISE ZONE TASK FORCE
SUBJECT:
Enclosed for your approval are the individuals the Mayor would like appointed to the
Environmental Enterpise Zone Task Force.
RF:pw
Encls.
zone
cc: City Manager Goss
Barbara Bamberger
l8"c -/
ENVIRONMENTAL ENTERPRIZE ZONE AND INCUBATOR PROGRAM
'.
CONCEPT
To sponsor state legislation amending the Enterprize Zone State code to expand the definition of
'enterprlze zones' In order to Include two demonstration proJects - one which will be within the City
of Chula Vista - aimed at encouraging envlronmentally-aound business/Industrial development within
the designated zone.
WHY AN ENVIRONMENTAL ENTERPRIZE ZONE
It has been estimated by the Federal Government, and moat recently at President-Elect Clinton's
Economic Summit this week, that Environmental Clean-up technology will grow over the next 25
years to match the employment base of the Defense Industry.
ENVIRONMENTAL ENTERPRIZE ZONE PROGRAM
The program would consist of two elements:
1. Enticing existing companies through state and local Incentives
2. Incubator program aimed to grow new businesses. This program would Intentionally bring In
small start-up businesses, work with local banks to provide reduced Interest loans, and
provide state tax Incentives for Investors Interested In Investing with these Incubator
businesses within the enterprize zone.
. State Tax Incentives
The two demonstration Environmental Enterprize Zones would benefit from the same tax Incentives
as state law currently provides for standard enterprize zones. These Include:
1. Tax relief - Personal and Corporate Income tax reductions
2. Access to bonding capability
3. Preference points for State contracts
4. Businesses within the enterprize zone receives first bid on state-owned land within zone.
In sddltlon, the sponsored legislation would Include tax Incentives for venture capitalists Investing
In small start-up businesses operating within the city's environmental Incubator program.
WHY WOULD THE STATE BE INTERESTED IN AN ENVIRONMENTAL ENTERPRIZE ZONE?
.
This demonstration proJect would have a direct policy link to NAFTA, as Southwestern College has
developed a well-known Import\Export Center, where they could act as a referral center for small-
business owners to the City's Enterprize zone. We would provide aaslstance In setting up their
business In proximity to the border. The Enterprize zone may also be seen as a State off-aet to
address proJected pollution Increases to border cities as a result of NAFTA. Finally, It meets
Sacramento's current need to bring together the environmental and business communities to support
a positive and Innovative approach to the economic problems of the state. It Ia likely we would
receive broad-based support for this effort.
I~c ."
..
.
.
ENVIRONMENTAL ENTERPRIZE ZONE TASK FORCE
REPRESENTATIVES
a) 14 members
b) 5 members from the Business Community:
1 - Banking
1 - Commercial Real Estate
1 - Business
1 - Chamber of Commerce
1 - Enviromental Technology
c) 5 members from Environmental/Community organizations/local
universities:
2 - Environmental Organizations
1 - Non-profit Community Development Corp
1 - UCSD
1 - Southwestern College
d) 4 members from Governmental Agencies:
2 - City Council Members
1 - city/County Reinvestment Task Force
1 - Economic Development Commission
I rC. .. t.
..
.
.
BUSINESS COMMUNITY REPRESENTATIVES:
1. Banking - ENRIQUE MELGAR
Manager, Chula vista Branch for International savings Bank
2. Real Estate - BERNIE RHEINERSON
Chairman of Legislative Committee - Construction Industry
Federation and Building Industry Association Board of
Directors
3. Business - SHEILA WASHINGTON
California Business Incubator Network
4. Chamber of Commerce - DON BLIND
Laidlaw Inc.
5. Environmental Technology - GRANT FERRIER
Editor-in-Chief Environmental Business Publishing Co.
ENVIRONMENTAL/COMMUNITY/UNIVERSITY/ REPRESENTATIVES
1. Environmental Organization - DIANE TAKVORIAN
Environmental Health Coalition
2. Environmental Organization - MICHAEL SHAMES
Sierra Club
3. community Development Corp. - JAY POWELL
City Heights Community Development corp
4. Southwestern College - VICTOR CASTILLO
Project Coordinator, Business International Education Program
5. University of California San Diego - GORDON MCDONALD
Institute for Global Conflic and Change - Environmental
Studies
GOVERNMENTAL AGENCIES
1. City county Reinvestment Task Force - JIM BLIESNER
Reinvestment Director
2. Councilperson SHIRLEY HORTON
3. Councilperson BOB FOX
4. Economic Development Commission -
18'c." 3
f.~
.
Environll'lental Technology
Pac Sheet
.-
..
January 14, 1993
The San Diego based Environmental Business Journal has identified twelve different segments
of the environmental technology industry, all of which have a strOng presence in California.
. Analytical Services (AS)
· Solid Waste Management (SWM)
· Hazardous Waste Management (HWM)
· AsbeStos Abatement (AA)
· Water Treatment (WT)
· Private Water Utilities (PWU)
· EngineeringiConsulting (E1C) .
· Resource RecoveryiRecycling (RRIR)
· Instrument Manufacturing (1M)
· Air Pollution Control (APC)
· Waste Management Equipment (WME)
· Alternative Energy (AE)
FlllJ ""1"..."'" or....1MuIIry _ _ io........ _y in EBJ'. ApriI_
In 1991, these industry segments provided over 180,000 jobs for Californians with revenues of
$20 billion.
.
1991 California Jobs /n Thousands
___.. ~ L1__........a.."I".,.'NIJ
6 OK r'"
40 K I .--..
20K i.
,
~
~-- "'f1V< '. :"/W@
pwu I/C aa/a 1M
AA
WT
....;.;:,:,.;.,-~ .
~
APC WMI AI
~
! -:<~':.r:~::',~ I :'.:-;-~
AS SWMHWM
1991 California Revenues in BiUiollS S
-..
......,.....,.......19) .,...,
-
~ I
~.
::. i;.=;: :},:" ..;:~
.~"~: :::'>.,<'..t',
SWMHWM AA
~
;:.:_:. :~:~')~t .% ::,;Jr. .~ _~~~_~t
WT pwu I/C aa/a
1M
~IB~
APC WMa A5
AI
- more-
.
Ire.. "'5'
'.
"
.
By 199.6, those figures are expected to grow to nearly a quaner of a million jobs and 527
billion in revenues.
1996 Ctdi!o,nia Jobs ill ThOllSD.lUis _.... '__"lMoo.IIIl"~_
"
.-
lOOK f
!OK -
AI
~............
e&JIl
.}\ ",\. -\/~k"~~'
~~
IWMHWMAA
~
AI
WT ,W1I I/C aala
1M
A'C WMI
1996 Ctdifornia Reve_es in Bil/iollS S
_"
.................1" _,.,
6
.
2
tIffii."
.~'>:t:~... , .........-..
::_:.::b?~: ,::;;::'\:K:;
sw HWM
~
WT ,W1I I/C alllll
AI
AS
AA
1M
.-
~~
A.CWMI
~
Nationally, this industry employs nearly a million workers with 1991 revenues ofS120 billion.
1991 NlllionaJ Jobs in Thousands _..... '__"_'"O)~-
.
:::: \=L =
AS SWM HWM AA
~
)~;'\\' t,'!,); . ;1~{i .
WT PWU E/C ItRllt
1M
~-
APC WME AI
1991 NlIIiontd Revenues in BilUolIS S
-...
................__..1" ...,
;: I
~
. .::/...
." ~':;~ .".:t :'~,
~
W T .W1I E/C RR/R
AI
IW HWM AA
1M
1'III'!'mI. '.'....'
~~
APC WME AE
. National Environmental Industry Revenues are projected to reach S 180 billion by the year
200 1.
Nlldontd Revenues by Far in BQlioIlS S -.. ---_..",--
1910
1916
\919
\9U
200
100
\913
.
l8'c -&,
.
Projections for California Environmental Technology Revenues
. - by year in Billions
27
26
25
24
23
22
21
20
19
18
17
16
15
14
13
. 12
11
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996
.
_: Er..io ... ~_""Dioao(619)29S.7615
/Tc-/
.
.
Projectionsfor Environmental Technology Jobsfor
Californians by Year
J
.-
.
2S0K
240K
230K
220K
210K
200K
190K
1SOK
170K
160K
1SOK
140K
130K
120K
llOK
lOOK
90K
SOK
70K
EOK
SOK
40K
30K
20K
10K
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
_ Ea.. ., _ -. SIn Diqo (619) 295-7615
.
Ire -r
,
I
California Environmental Prolection A.gency
-\" hJ(l~rrrJ /joQl'd . iknaff1MlIl (H PrsnrltJl Rnwi,u.nuII , l.Wf)tJ1""'''' III T(.,~.., ,S.,iWUIII'P! \,,',ml1Ol . lIunNJWd ~jUlt .'I~UIQ"'lfttlll l'(J(.lf'd
I J~rlu 01 [1I1'V''',,,,,,",Ul Hf'Ullh H..:Q.flJ AUl'UI7ltlU . ->'"'1' ~Q/t' 1(I'J1IW11'1') \,'O/u"m SOUI'a , Rt'IIWIWI ~',"" tJiloJUl\ ('omm, Bn~rdJ
.
rote \Ii ilson
',:"ll'Pftflr
<~
, -,
;~_.~
.J.,I.~,
"'!:!P'
"
James M. Slrock
>>'1."''',.... Inr EIl\1I'l?Ilimml4l PmlttMrt
.-
Environmental technologies. products and services prevent, decrease.
control. mitigate. detect or monitor pollution. Examples of environmental
technology include:
..
..
..
'.
",
..
. ..
..
..
.
Technologies or strategies that bring about pollution prevention such
as product substitution or process designs that decrease waste
generation;
Hazardous waste treatment technologies;
Recycling and resource recovery. including recycling of 011. paper.
glass. tires. metals. solvents and other wastes and recovery of energy
from waste;
Municipal solid waste treatment technologies;
Municipal and industrial sewage treatment technologies;
Pesticide alternatives;
Remediation services and technologies including technologies that
assist in contaminated site clean-up;
..
Non-point source treatment technologies and strategies;
Transportation sYstems that reduce pollution;
..
..
Electric vehicles and their components;
..
Energy conservation technologies and strategies;
..
Emission controls Involving technologies that decrease air pOllution
such as electrostatic precipitators, misters and bag houses;
. .'
..
Alternative fuels or energy sources;
..
Detection and monitoring equipment such as probes and sensors.
SSSC.po..,Mall.S.Ile23S . S.oramen.o,C.IiComia ~5814 . ,9161445.3846 . Fu: ,9161445.6401
0-,,-- Ire --'1