HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007/07/17 Item 14
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA STATEMENT
~'Yf:. CllY OF
"H~ CHULA VISTA
ITEM TITLE:
July 17, 2007, Itemft
PUBLIC HEARING: PCZ-07-02/PCC-06-042; Consideration
of the following applications filed by St. Rose of Lima Catholic
Parish for 3:9 acres located at the northeast comer of Third
Avenue and H Street:
a. PCZ-07-02-Zoning-Modification to establish Precise
Plan Modifying District (P) for the underlying
Apartment Residential Zone (R-3); and adopt Precise
Plan Standards for the subject property.
b. PCC-06-042-Conditional Use Permit for the renovation
and expansion of an existing church campus.
ORDINANCE: of the City Council of the City of
Chula Vista adopting Mitigated Negative Declaration and
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 1S-06-13,
amending zoning map or maps established by Chula Vista
Municipal Code Section 19.18.010 to establish the Precise Plan
Modifying District and adopt Precise Plan Standards for 3.9
acres at the northeast comer of Third Avenue and "H" Street
currently zoned R3, Apartment Residential.
RESOLUTION: of the City Council of the City of
Chula Vista approving Conditional Use Permit to allow the
renovation and expansion of an existing church/school facility
known as St. Rose of Lima Catholic Parish located at the
northeast comer of Third Avenue and "H" Street.
SUBMITTED BY:
Dire,to, ofP1",""o, \,d BillJdin~
City Manager ~l ~
Acting Assistant b~ Manager 71
REVIEWED BY:
4/STHS VOTE: YES D NO ~
14-1
Page 2, Item L
Meeting Date: 7/17/07
BACKGROUND
The 3.9-acre project site at the northeast comer of Third and "H" Street has been utilized
as a church campus since 1921. Since that time, a parochial school was added, and the
site layout of campus facilities has been reconfigured at various times. The applicant is
requesting a phased renovation and expansion of church campus in order to 1) upgrade
the existing facilities and 2) provide for anticipated growth. The request includes a
Zoning Modification to allow the establishment of Precise Plan Modifying District and
special development standards for the unique landmark quality urban setting of this project.
A Conditional Use Pennit is also requested to allow for the proposed church/school campus
modification and expansion at this location. .
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed project for
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has conducted
an Initial Study IS-06-013 in accordance with the CEQA. Based upon the results of the
Initial Study, the Environmental Review Coordinator determined that the project could
result in significant effects on the environment. However, revisions to the project made
by or agreed to by the applicant would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point
where clearly no significant effects would occur; therefore, the Environmental Review
Coordinator has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration, IS-06-013 and associated
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.
RECOMMENDATION
Adopt the Ordinance for PCZ-07-02 and Resolution for PCC 06-042 based upon the
findings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
On June 26, 2007, the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed project and voted
(4-0-3-0) (Moctezuma, Felber and Clayton absent) to recommend that the City Council
adopt the Ordinance and Resolution approving the zone modification and conditional use
permit based on the findings and subj ect to the conditions contained therein.
On November 6, 2006, the project received a preliminary review by the Design Review
Committee (DRC). On May 7, 2007, the project went back to DRC for formal review
and approval. The Committee approved the project by (3-0-1-0 vote with Alberdi
abstaining) subject to certain conditions (see Attachment 8)
On April 16, 2007, the Resource Conservation Committee (RCC) discussed the adequacy
of the Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) for St. Rose of Lima Catholic Parish.
Following a presentation by the applicant and discussion by the RCC, two votes were
taken. The first vote (4-0-0-0 with Reid, Macias and Davis recused) found that the Initial
14-2
Page 3, Item~
Meeting Date: 7/17/07
Study was adequate with regards to the MND. The second vote (4-0-0-0 with Reid,
Macias and Davis recused) was a request that the future architecture for the new
church/sanctuary incorporate the current existing architectural mission theme. This has
been incorporated as a Design Review condition of approval.
DISCUSSION
Background:
On April19, 2007, a neighborhood meeting was held to present the proposed project to
the surrounding residents and solicit their input. Although a notice was mailed to
residents within 500 feet of the project site regarding the neighborhood meeting, no
residents attended.
The site has been used as a church campus since the original church was constructed on
the site in 1921, at the southeast corner of Third Avenue and Alvarado Street. In 1948,
the main portion of existing school was added to the campus along Third Avenue. In
1950, the original church was relocated to the southwest corner of Third Avenue and H
Street. The only Conditional Use Permit on record (C-63-3) was approved by the City
Council on August 19, 1963 for the construction of a new church/sanctuary and to add
office space to the existing rectory. This new and relocated church/sanctuary facility
currently exists along the southern portion ofthe site, along H Street. The four conditions
of approval contained in the approving Planning Commission and City Council
Resolutions were previously implemented and are included in this new Conditional Use
Permit recommendation. No hours of operation were delineated (see Attachment 3).
Project Site Characteristics:
The project site consists of a 3.9-acre rectangular shaped parcel located at the northeast
corner of Third Avenue and "H" Street. The site contains an existing church campus
consisting of five facilities: a church/sanctuary, parochial school, parish hall, rectory and
pastoral center. The site contains surface parking to accommodate 191 vehicles.
The following table summarizes the existing and surrounding land uses to the project site:
Site General Plan Existing Zoning Current Land Vse
Orientation
Site Transit Focus Area R-3 Existinl1" church camnus
North Transit Focus Area, VCI, R3, R3P14 CommerciaVSingle-Multi- Family
Residential Hil1"h Residential
South Transit Focus Area VCI Commercial Office
East Residential- R31R3P14 Multi-Family Residential
Medium-High;
Residential-Hil1"h
West Transit Focus Area VCI Commercial Office
14-3
Page 4, Item--1L
Meeting Date: 7/17/07
Proj ect Description:
Conditional Use Permit
The project consists of a new school, parish hall, church/sanctuary and other site
improvements including landscaping and a renovation of the parking lot area on the east
side of the campus. Off-site shared parking at the Gateway Center parking structure
directly west of the project side, across Third Avenue, is also proposed to meet the
church parking requirements (refer to shared parking discussion on page10 of this report).
The project is proposed to be implemented in three construction phases, more specifically
described below.
Phase 1 - This construction phase includes the demolition of a portion of the existing
school (3,650 s.f.) and construction on a new 23,226 square foot two story school at
northwest comer of the campus. During this phase, the existing church, parish hall, rectory
and pastoral center will remain, along with the existing parking lot area containing 178
spaces. Since a total of 229 parking spaces are required overall, 51 parking spaces are
proposed off-site at the Gateway office complex to the west (see Attachment 4). A two
party parking agreement for the off-site shared parking spaces is required for this phase.
Phase 2 - This phase includes demolition of the remaining 13,422 s.f. the existing school
and the construction of a new 14, 027 s.f. parish hall. The on-site parking capacity will
be reduced from 178 to 165 spaces (for a loss of 13 spaces). The existing church, rectory
and pastoral center will remain during this phase. The off-site, shared parking agreement
would be modified to accommodate 64 parking spaces. Thus, a total of 229 total parking
spaces will be provided as required for the first two phases and existing development on
the site (see Attachment 4)
Phase 3 - Phase 3 will include demolition of existing 9,936 sq. ft. church/sanctuary
(which has a seating capacity of 800) and construction of a new 14,027 s.f. church/
sanctuary with 1,500 seat capacity. The new sanctuary will be relocated to the southwest
comer of the subject property. During this phase, the project also proposes the
demolition of the existing parish hall and adjacent rectory building. Parking lot and
landscaping will be completely reconfigured. A total of 429 parking spaces are required
at this build-out phase. A total of 169 parking spaces will be provided on-site. The off-
site shared parking agreement would again be modified to provide a minimum of 260 off-
site parking spaces (see Sheets A.O and AO.2a and b, Attachment 9).
Operational Profile
Operational Profile including number of employees and hours of operation are described
in the following table:
14-4
Page 5, ItemJL
Meeting Date: 7/17/07
St Rose of Lima Parish
Existing Proposed Operational Profile
Existing Proposed (Phase 1)
SCHOOL
Total Number of Students: 342 400
Pre-school 0 53
K-8th grade 342 342
Number of school employees
(including teachers) 34 36
Before School Student Drop-Off M-F 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m. Same as existing
Hours
School Hours M-F 8:00 a.m. to 2:30 p.m.; Same as existing
Saturdav 8:00 a.m. to II :00 a.m.
After School Student Pick-Up M-F 2:30 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. Same as existing
Hours
After School Care M-F 2:30 p.m. to 6:00 p.m. Same as existin"
CHURCHlSACTUARY
. Total Number of
Employees (includes 28 same
cler"" and I~v)
. Hours of Operation: Services: Saturday 5 :00 p.m. and Services: Saturdays 7:30a.m to
6:30 p.m. 10:00 am; 5:00 p.m. to 7:30
Sundays 7:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. p.m.
Weekdays 6:15 a.m.; 8:00 a.m. Sundays 7:00 a.m. to 8:30 p.m.
plus 6:30 p.m. on Thursdays Weekdays 6:15 a.m; 8:00 a.m.;
Funerals: Monday-Friday 9 a.m.; 5:00 p.m.-7:30 p.m.
11 :00 a.m. Funerals: Monday-Friday
Weddings: Saturdays II a.m.; 9 a.m. to noon
1:00 p.m. and 3:00 p.m Other Liturgies: Saturdays 10
Other group meetings during a.m. to 4:00 p.m.; 7:0Op.m.-
evening hours Mon-Fri. 9:30 p.m.
Other group meetings/small
liturgies during evening hours
Mon-Fri
. Total Number of Major
Weekend Services 8 same
P ARlSH SOCIAL HALL Monday-Friday 6:00 p.m. to 9:30 Monday-Friday 4:00 p.m. to
Hours of operation p.m.; Sat/Sun 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 10:00 p.m.; Sat/Sun 7:00 a.m.
p.m to 11:00 p.m.
Upper floor used by school Upper floor to be used by
during normal school hours school during normal business
hours
PASTORAL CENTER Mon-Fri 8:30 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Monday-Friday 8:00 a.m. to
Hours of Operation: 9:00 p.m.
Parish Office Monday-Friday 8:30 a.m. to 6:00
Other Offices/small chapel p.m.; Sat/Sun 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 Mon-Fri 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.;
(accommodates approximately 33 p.m. Sat/Sun 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
persons)
14-5
Page 6, Item~
Meeting Date: 7/17/07
Zoning Modification
The applicant is requesting to modify the zoning of the subject site to establish a Precise
Plan Modifying District (P) for the project site. Precise plan development standards are
being proposed for the project due to the unique nature of the site and surrounding area. The
Precise Plan Standards include development standards related to building height/setbacks
and shared parking provisions (see Attachment 6)
Project data:
REOUlRED/ALLOWED PRECISE PLAN PROPOSED
Existing - 191 Allows for the required off-site Parkin!! Proposed
parking spaces at each
construction phase. Shared Phase I = 178 spaces on-site and 51
Parkin!! Required: parking will be allowed in spaces off-site (total 229)
conjunction the following: 1) Phase II = 165 spaces on-site an 64
Phase I = 229 parking study showing excess spaces off-site (total 229)
Phase II = 229 parking available from donor Phase III = 169 spaces on-site and
Phase III = 429 during time of applicants need 260 spaces off-site (total 429)
for such spaces; 2) copy of
agreement between Donor and
Reciuient.
Setbacks Required: Setbacks Proposed: Setbacks Proposed:
Existing required (H Street) = 5 H Street = 0 H Street = 0
to 25 ft.
Existing required (Third Ave) = Third Avenue = 0 Third Avenue = 0
5ft
Existing required (Alvarado) = Alvarado St. = 0 Alvarado St. = 0
5 to 20 ft.
Interior = 5 feet N/A 5 ft.
Building Height Maximum Building Height Proposed: 54 Building Height Proposed: 54 ft.
Existing Maximum: 45 feet ft. (bldg.) 90 feet (top of (building) 90 feet (top of spire)""
suire)""
Interior Side Fence Maximum Interior Side Fence Height Interior Side Fence Height
Hei!!ht : 6 feet Maximum: 8 feet Maximum: 8 feet
""Per Section 19.16.040 of Municipal Code, church tower is exempt from height regulations.
Analysis:
Conditional Use Permit
The applicant is proposing that the three new/replacement buildings be sited with a
pedestrian orientation along the adj acent streets. This is consistent with the goal of the
Urban Core Specific Plan, which surrounds the proj ect site on three sides. This will open
up most of the eastern portion of the site for a centralized parking field rather then the
segmented parking arrangement that currently exists. The proposed school will wrap
around the northwest comer of the site with two wings, the larger area along Alvarado
14-6
Page 7, ItemL
Meeting Date: 7/17/07
Street and the smaller along Third Avenue. The new parish hall building will be located
along Third A venue just south of, and connected by second floor pedestrian bridge to the
new school to the north. The new church/sanctuary is proposed just south of the new
parish hall, where it will flank the corner of Third Avenue and H Street (see sheet A.O.O
of Attachment 9). The only existing building, which will remain is the pastoral center
located on the northeast portion of. the site. Because the pastoral center is oriented
towards, and takes its access off of, Alvarado Street, it will not detract from the overall
pedestrian orientation being proposed. The existing parking area to the west and east of
the pastoral center will remain, which also will continue to provide the main
ingress/egress for drop-off and pick-up of students, for up to a maximum of 400 students.
Said existing driveways will provide access to the main parking field directly to the
south. .
Operational ProfilelHours of Operation
There will be minimal changes to the existing operational profile and hours of operation.
As discussed in the following section, the new school facility will accommodate two new
preschool classrooms. This will necessitate two additional teachers, increasing the total
number of school employees from 34 to 36. While the hours of operation will be
increased slightly from existing, the primary reason for such increase in hours is to
accommodate and provide flexibility to the actual hours of services. As noted in the table
above, the total of number of weekend services will remain at a maximum of eight. Any
increase in number of weekend services will require approval by the Zoning
Administrator. Despite the doubling in size of the church/sanctuary facility, no changes
are proposed in terms of number of church employees.
Phased Development
The applicant is proposing a master plan which in broken down into three separate
construction phases. It is anticipated that Phase I will commence within six months of
project approval and should take approximately 18 months to complete. Phase II should
commence within six months following completion of Phase 1. Phase III, which involves
construction of the church/sanctuary is anticipated to commence five to seven years from
the date of project approval. These development phases and the accompanying changes
in on-site facilities are analyzed in more detail below:
Phase I (Parochial School) - A new two-story parochial school will be constructed
during Phase 1. The existing one story 17,072 s.f. school facility has existing on the
project site since 1948 and currently consists of three separate detached buildings.
The largest of the three buildings, approximately 10,000 s.f., is located off of Third
Avenue, the second building, approximately 3,650 s.f. is located at the northwest
corner of the site, and the third building, approximately 3,420 s.f. is located near the
center of the site. Rather than doing a major upgrade to the existing school facility
and in order to accommodate additional classroom space for a preschool, a new
school building is proposed. The new school will be 23,226 square feet in a two-
story building. School will have a maximum capacity of 400 students.
14-7
Page 8, ItemJL
Meeting Date: 7/17/07
Due to the proposed location of the new school, only the detached 3,650 s.f.
structure at the northwest comer of the site will be demolished during Phase 1. The
two story facility will require less building lot coverage on the site, which will
provide land needed for additional playground areas. While the new school will
continue to operate one classroom for each grade (K-12), it will also include two
new preschool classrooms which can accommodate up to 56 students. As a result,
the student enrollment numbers increase from 342 to 400 students, to accommodate
the preschool. The school will continue its same operating hours and will increase
total school employees by approximately two in order to accommodate the new
preschool.
Phase II (Parish Hall) - The site contains an existing one-story parish hall building,
which is approximately 9,400 square feet in size. A new two-story facility,
approximately 14,000 square feet in size, will be constructed during this second
phase. The remaining portion of the existing school (approximately 13,400 s.f.) will
be demolished in order to accommodate the new and relocated parish hall. The
8,000 square foot first floor of the new parish hall facility will accommodate a large
(320 dinner seat) social hall with adjacent catering kitchen. The large social hall
component can also be partitioned off to create four separate meeting rooms. The
6,000 square foot second floor will be used as a multi-purpose room. A second
floor bridge is proposed between the multi-purpose room and the second floor of
the school to facilitate the rooms use by student activities during normal school
hours.
Phase III (Church/Sanctuary) - The eXlstmg church/sanctuary facility is
approximately 10,000 s.f. in size and contains 800 seats. A new church/sanctuary
facility approximately 25,000 s.f in size and will contain 1,500 seats. The new
facility is planned for the third and final phase of construction. It is anticipated that
this final construction phase may not commence for between five and seven years.
Rather than doing a major upgrade of the existing facility to accommodate the
needs for a larger seating capacity, the new church is being proposed. In addition,
the church/sanctuary will be relocated to the southwest corner of the site. The
church is located in a prominent location in downtown Chula Vista. Due to its
location, the church anticipates the needs of a growing congregation size. This
growth is anticipated due to the proposed increases in residential densities of the
immediate surrounding areas as well as the increased population of the master
planned communities to the east. The relocation of the church/sanctuary facility
from its existing location will 1) help to facilitate a better on-site parking field
arrangement and 2) better facilitate pedestrian access both from parishioners who
choose to park off-site at the Gateway Center parking structure to the west as well
as from surrounding residential areas.
The main entrance to the new church/sanctuary facility will be from an interior
gathering area at the northeast comer of the building. A secondary entrance to the
church is being provided at the southwest corner of the building to facilitate
pedestrian access.
14-8
Page 9, Item~
Meeting Date: 7/17/07
Parking and Pedestrian Circulation
Pursuant to Chapter 19.62 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, parking demand is based
upon the seating capacity of the sanctuary, at a rate of one parking space per 3.5 seats.
Based upon a total of 1,500 seats proposed, a total of 429 parking spaces are required at
the time the new church/sanctuary is constructed (Phase III). The applicant is proposing
to provide for a portion of the required parking on-site. The remaining parking will be
provided off-site. The applicant is proposing to utilize an office building parking facility
(Gateway office building). Parking agreements between the church and office building
parking facility owners (Gateway office building) and between the church and City are
required prior to issuance of building permits. Provisions to allow shared parking are
included in the applicants' request for a Precise Plan in conjunction with the rezone
proposed for this project (see Zoning ModificationlPrecise Plan section on Page 10 of
this report).
On Site Parking
A total of 178 on-site parking spaces will be provided for Phase I, and 165 on-site
parking spaces will be provided for Phase II. Once the parking lot is completely
reconfigured at Phase III, a total of 169 parking spaces will be provided on-site.
Off-site/Shared Parking
A minimum of 51 off-site parking spaces for Phase I, 64 off-site phases for Phase II and a
minimum of 260 off-site parking spaces for Phase III are required in order for the project
to remain in compliance with the parking standards of the CYMe. These will be
provided for at the Gateway office building parking structure (see Locator Map), located
west of the project site (across Third Avenue). The applicant has prepared a parking
analysis for the Gateway structure in conjunction with their traffic study (see Attachment
5). The parking analysis indicates there is adequate parking available on weekends to
accommodate the required 260 parking spaces. (Refer to section on Shared Parking under
Precise Plan Guidelines)
The following table illustrates the project compliance with the applicable parking
requirements:
Total Parkin Re uired:
ro osed as follows:
1,500
1:3.5
429
Provided
169
260
429
In order to further minimize parking impacts to the Gateway Center a parking
management plan will be required, to insure that the church parking facilities are utilized
first and Gateway Parking Structure is used as an overflow parking facility.
14-9
Page 10, ItemL
Meeting Date: 7/17/07
Parking Agreement
A two party agreement between the applicant and the City is required to ensure that the
required off-site parking will be provided at all times. Failure to provide said off-site
parking could require the church to temporarily reduce the seating capacity of the
sanctuary to a point where the aggregate of on-site and off-site parking provides the
number of spaces required by the CYMC, based upon amount of seating within the
sanctuary facility.
In an effort to prevent the above occurrence, the conditions of approval outline the
process the applicant is to follow if the existing Donor Site (Gateway) should choose at
some point in time to no longer provide parking for the chUrch use.
Specifically, the following process must be followed by the applicant in the event the
existing Donor Site being utilized for off-site parking will no longer be available. Failure
to comply with these steps will result in the applicant being required to reduce operations
to a level where adequate parking is provided by the CVMC:
1. A minimum of 90 days prior to termination of existing agreement, Gateway
("existing Donor") must notify St. Rose of Lima Catholic Parish ("Recipient") of
intent to terminate agreement.
2. Within 5 days of notification of termination, applicant shall inform city of existing
Donor intent to terminate agreement. Applicant shall provide City with alternative
location( s) they will propose to utilize to provide required off-site parking. City will
review proposed locations and determine if additional discretionary approvals or
additional environmental review will be required.
3. Within 30 days of notification of termination, applicant shall provide City with a
Shared Parking Report demonstrating availability of excess parking on the new
Donor site, which is available for us during hours of church services.
4. Within 60 days of notification of termination, applicant shall provide City with 1)
new shared parking agreement between Donor and Recipient, and 2) Updated
agreement between applicant and City for on-going provision for off-site parking.
Pedestrian Access
Pedestrian access from the Gateway parking structure will be provided via sidewalk along
the west side of Third Avenue with pedestrian crossing at the controlled intersection of 3rd
and H Streets. The main entrance to the church will be provided at the southwest comer of
the building (facing the comer of Third and H Streets) to help facilitate pedestrian ingress
and egress.
Zoning Modification/Precise Plan
As indicated above, the applicant is requesting that the P Modifying District be added to the
current zone district, along with certain special development standards. The increased
14-10
Page 11, Item L
Meeting Date: 7/17/07
flexibility inherent in the Precise Plan Standards will guide the development or
redevelopment of the project site and will provide the project designer with sufficient
flexibility to create a more efficient site design, suitable for an urbanized area. This is
consistent with the goals and policies of the newly adopted General Plan. These special
standards, which would add flexibility to design the site, are outlined below:
Shared Parking
Currently, Chapter 19.62 ofCYMC contains no provisions for shared parking. This chapter
requires that each use "stand alone" in terms of providing the required parking for each use.
The applicant is requesting that shared parking be allowed whereby required parking spaces
for another use, can be "shared" with the need for parking by the church. A parking analysis
was prepared for the Gateway Commercial center. The results indicated that on weekends,
at the time the church is in need of 261 off-site parking spaces, this amount of parking
spaces is available for use by the church, without negatively impacting Gateway's parking
needs (see Attachment 5).
Agreement
Section 19.62.040 of CYMC discusses alternatives to on-site parking. The applicant
proposed to utilize the Gateway parking structure located just west of the project site and
lies within the required 200- foot maximum distance by publicly available pedestrian access
from the site. However, this section requires ". ..a binding agreement with the city as to the
permanent reservation of said space and access thereto..." The applicant is requesting that a
binding agreement with permanent reservation not be required.
Instead, the applicant is proposing a private parking agreement between themselves (the
recipient) and the Gateway (the donor), which will include a required 90-day notification
as to the donor dissolving the agreement. A separate 2-party agreement will be provided
between the applicant and the City. Staff has placed conditions of the project, which
outline a process which must be followed in the event that off-site parking spaces at
Gateway are no longer available.
Development Standards
In addition to the above, the applicant is also requesting certain modifications be allowed to
the required development standards. These modifications are proposed to be included in the
overall precise plan guidelines being requested for this project. The applicant is requesting
the building setbacks be reduced to zero on all three streets of the property. Currently there
are required setbacks for the site established by the Building Line setback map. These
required setbacks range from 5 feet along Third Avenue to between 5 and 25 feet along H
and Alvarado Streets. To develop the project in keeping with the surrounding existing
Gateway office building across the street and with anticipated redevelopment to the north
and south, the applicant is requesting a zero setback.
Currently the maximum allowable building height is 45 feet. The applicant requests this
maximum be increased to 54 feet as measured to the roofline of the proposed
church/sanctuary structure. This is consistent with the recently adopted Urban Core Specific
Plan (UCSP), which affects the adjacent properties to the north, south and west. Adoption of
14-11
Page 12, Item~
Meeting Date: 7/17/07
the UCSP has increased the maximum building height of the surrounding parcels from 45
feet to 84 feet. While the proposed spire for the church exceeds this 84- foot maximum
height, it is an allowed exemption from the height regulations per Section 19.16.040 of the
CYMC.
The requested increase in fence height from 6 feet to 8 feet along the eastern property line
will facilitate an additional barrier between existing residential use to the east with non-
residential use of the subject site. Increasing the height to 8 feet will provide an additional
noise buffer for adjacent residents from the central parking fieldlbasketball court usage on-
site.
Appropriateness of Precise Plan standards for proiect site
The site is adjacent and contiguous to the newly adopted Urban Core Specific Plan (UCSP)
on three sides (north, south and west). The UCSP promotes a development pattern, which
facilitates a compact urban environment, which is pedestrian friendly. The project is being
designed to continue the development patterns promoted by the UCSP. In order to achieve
these goals, the proposed project requests development standards similar to those in the
UCSP including: 1) zero building setbacks, 2) increased building height, and 3) minimal on-
site surface parking with remaining parking off-site. The proposed structures will utilize a
zero building setback line with on-site parking to the east, behind the buildings, which will
front along the western portion of the site facing Third Avenue and H Street. The proposed
building height of 54 feet will be similar to that established by the Gateway structure
(approximately 56 feet) to the west as well as by anticipated building heights up to 84 feet as
allowed under the UCSP.
CONCLUSION:
Based upon the preceding information, staff has concluded that the project meets the
requirements to allow the requested Zoning Modification and Conditional Use Permit.
Approval of the Conditional Use Permit is contingent upon the zoning modification and the
Ordinance taking effect.
DECISION MAKER CONFLICT:
Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council and has found no property
holdings within 500 feet of the boundaries ofthe property that is subject to this action.
FISCAL IMPACT
The applicant has paid all costs associated with the processmg of the proposed
conditional use permit and zoning modification.
ATTACHMENTS
I Planning Commission Resolution
2 Final Mitigated Negative Declaration
14-12
Page 13, ItemJL
Meeting Date: 7/17/07
3 1963 Planning Commission and City Council Resolutions
4 Phasing Plan
5 Parking Analysis for Gateway Center
6 Proposed Precise Plan Standards
7 Meeting Minutes from Design Review Committee
8 Ownership Disclosure Form
9 Proj ecl Plans
Prepared by: Jeff Steichen, Associate Planner, Department of Planning and Building
14-13
C HULA VISTA PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT
LOCATOR ~~~: st. ~ose of Lima Catholic PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
C9 Parish ZONING MODIFICATIONI
~~~1: 293 H St. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
Project Description: Phased removal and replacement of churth and
SCALE: FILE NUMBER: ancillary parish facilities (except for pastoral center) on 3.4 acre sne.
NORTH No Scale PCZ-07-02/PCC-06~O~2 l.Related cases: IS.Q~13, PCC.QS-042
l:\Gabe FITes\locators\pcz0702...,pcc060042_ CUP-zoning Moditication.cdr 0626.07
RESOLUTION NO. PCC 06-042/PCZ-07-02
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COM:MISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA RECOMMENDJNG THAT THE CITY COUNCIL 1) ADOPT MITGATED
NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND
REPORTJNG PROGRAM IS-06-13; 2) APPROVE AND ESTABLISH CONDITIONS
FOR CONDTIONAL USE PERMIT AND 3) APPROVE A ZONE MODIFCATION
TO ESTABLISH A PREICSE PLAN MODIFYJNG DISTRICT FOR THE
PROPERTY AT 293 H STREET KNOWN AS ST. ROSE OF LIMA CATHOLIC
PARISH
WHEREAS, a duly verified application for a Conditional Use Pennit was filed
with the City of Chula Vista Planning and Building Department on January 13, 2006 and
September 21,2006 respectively, by St. Rose of Lima Catholic Parish. ("Applicant"); and
WHEREAS, the application requests approval of a Conditional Use Pennit (pCC-
06-042) to allow the renovation and expansion of the existing church campus in three
construction phases (Project); and
WHEREAS, the application also includes a Zone Modification (pCZ-07-02) to
establish the Precise Plan Modifying District and adopt Precise Plan Standards (project)
for 3.9 acres located at the northeast corner of Third Avenue and "H" Street (Project
Site); and
WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed
project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and has conducted
an Initial Study, IS-06-013 in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act.
Based upon the results of the Initial Study, the Environmental Review Coordinator has
determined that the project could result in significant effects on the environment.
However, revisions to the project made by or agreed to by the applicant would avoid the
effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant effects would occur;
therefore, the Environmental Review Coordinator has prepared a Mitigated Negative
Declaration, IS-06-013; and
WHEREAS, the Director of Planning and Building set the time and place for a
hearing on said Conditional Use Permit and notice of said hearing, together with its
purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and
its mailing to property owners and residents within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of
the property at least 10 days prior to the hearing; and
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely
June 27, 2007, at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the
Planning Commission and said hearing was thereafter closed.
14-15
"ATTACHMENT 1
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission recommend
that the City Council adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration-IS-06-013 and Draft City
Council Resolution and Ordinance approving the Project in accordance with the findings
and subject to the conditions contained therein.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the City
Council.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA
VISTA, CAILIFORNIA, this 27th day of June, 2007 by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Bryan Felber, Chair
ATTEST:
J :IPlanning\casefiles\-06(tyOS-06)IPCC\Public HearingIPCC-06-049\pcc-06-049.pc.RESOLUTION.doc
14-16
Mitigated Negative Declaration
PROJECT NAME:
St. Rose of Lima Catholic School and Church Complex
PROJECT LOCATION:
293 H Street
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.:
568-512-37/39/48
PROJECT APPLICANT:
St. Rose of Lima Parish of the Catholic Diocese of San Diego
CASE NO.:
IS-06-0 13
DATE OF DRAFT DOCUMENT:
March 28. 2007
DATE OF RESOURCE CONSERVATION COMMISSION MEETING: April 16. 2007
DATE OF FINAL DOCUMENT:
May 1. 2007
Prepared by:
Maria C. Muett. Associate Planner
Revisions made to this document subsequent to the issuance of the notice of availability of
the draft Mitigated Negative Declaration are denoted by underline.
A. Proi ect Setting
The project site consists of a fully developed 3.9-acre project area located on the northeast comer of
H Street and Third Avenue; 293 H Street(see Exhibit 'A'). The present development consists of the
St. Rose of Lima Catholic Church and Parochial School. The site is developed with on-site parking
and landscaped areas. The project site is presently served by four driveways, two on H Street and two
off of Alvarado Avenue (See Exhibit 'B '). Frontage roadway improvements are completed along
Alvarado Avenue.
Land uses surrounding the project site consist of the following:
North: Vacant land, Fast Food Restaurant, and Multifamily Residential
South: Medical and Professional Offices
East: Multifamily and Single-Family residential
West: Commercial Retail and Commercial Office
B. Proiect Description
The project consists of the phased renovation and expansion to the existing St. Rose of Lima Catholic
Church and School. The site is fully graded and developed with a' school (kindergarten to 8th
grades/342 students), a church sanctuary accommodating 800 seats, a one-story parochial parish hall,
rectory and a pastoral center and paved parking area to accommodate 186 spaces. The buildings were
constructed between 1948 and 1955 and the church completed by 1965.
The existing St. Rose private school will be remodeled and a portion of the school building will be
demolished and replaced with two story school buildings to accommodate ail ultimate enrollment of
400 students, in addition to faculty and staff personnel. The square footage for the existing seven
buildings is approximately 51,923 square feet and proposed development buildout is 69,115 square
feet; an increase of 17,192 square feet. Outside areas include existing sports fields and courts.
Proposed improvements to these areas include a small soccer field and parking lot/basketball court.
ATTACHMENT 2
14-17
1
In addition to the four existing driveways, a new-gated pedestrian walkway access is proposed off of
Third Avenue. The project includes landscaped treatments, lighting, on-site drainage facilities,
pedestrian pathways, fencing, retaining walls, barrier walls, and interior chain link fences separating
parking lots from school activity areas, and pickup and drop off areas. In compliance with City
Engineering requirements, the applicant will be required to dedicate additional right-of-way and
install street improvements along the northeast portion of Third Avenue and H Street.
The existing on-site parking provides 183 spaces. Project landscaping requirements will eliminate
spaces leaving minimum 170 on-site spaces at the time Phase 3 is developed. The project applicant
has access to off-site parking at the Gateway Parking Structures that will provide 259 of the required
parking spaces. The total number of:final parking spaces both on and off-site available to the
applicant is 429 spaces, which meets the Chula Vista Zoning Ordinance requirements. Further details
regarding the parking requirements, off-site parking and shared parking agreement are discussed
below linder the Traffic!Transportation Section.
The Master Plan PhasinJ!:
The development consists of three phases to allow the renovation and expansion of the church and
school to meet current and future church and school needs. The phased development is outlined
below.
Phases 1 and 2:
Demolition of portions of existing private school buildings and replacement with new two-story
buildings to accommodate a total buildout of 400 students plus relocation of existing kindergarten,
computer and science labs. Construction of a new two-story parochial parish hall building with
second floor multipurpose room (net tota114,027 square-feet) and demolition of the existing Learning
Center, and school buildings.
Phase 3:
Construction of the buildout phase consists of demolition and construction of the new church .
sanctuary to accommodate 1500 seats, completion or paved parking lots, landscaped treatments, and
site improvements. During this phase, the project proposes demolition of the existing hall and
adj acent rectory building.
Proposed fill grading will occur over the entirety of the 3.4-acre site. Amount of grading includes
approximately 1,300 cubic yards to be excavated for the bui1dout development; primarily Phase 1
(250 cubic yards), Phase 2 (800 cubic yards) and Phase 3 (250 cubic yards). Any excavated soil will
be relayered over the project site, if necessary.
It is anticipated that the phased master plan will take five plus years to complete. During the interim
periods, demolition of facilities will be phased to accommodate students and church related uses.
Hours of Operation - PriVate School
Existing and Phased Development
The current private school operational hours wilf not change from the current schedule. The project
planning and site plan call for a student drop off and pick up area to be functioning prior to school
startup and school closure. Students will walk to the nearby churcb/sanctuary for weekday services
14-18
')
(masses, prayer groups, etc.). No conflict between school operations and weekday church activities
will occur or create potential adverse conditions.
The existing and proposed preschool playground, small soccer field and basketball court are for use
by the school students and church m=bers ouly within the scheduled activity hours and in
accordance with the City Municipal CodeJNoise Ordinance, Chapter 19.68, standards and regulations.
Hours of Operation - Church/Sanctuary Comolex
Existing and Phased Development
The existing church services and masses are 7:00 am., 8:30 a.m., 10:00 a.m., 11:30 a.m., 1:15 p.m.
and 5:00 p.m. on Sundays, 5:00 p.m. and 6:30 p.rn. on Saturdays, and 6:15 a.m., and 8:00 a.m. on
weekdays, plus 6:30 p.m. on Thursday evenings. Confessions are 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 am. or by
appointment on Saturdays. There will be no changes in these hours of service during, the development
phases or after all construction is completed. Therefore, no significant impacts have been identified.
C. Comoliance with Zoning and Plans
The project site is located within the R3 (Multi-Family Residential) Zone and RH (High
Density/Residential) General Plan land use designation. The project is consistent with the regulations
of the Zoning Code and the General Plan land use designations. . The project requires the approval of
a Design Review Permit by the Design Review Committee, a Conditional Use Permit and a Rezone
from Rl-RlP to allow a Precise Plan with specific development standards by the Planning
Commission.
D. Public Comments
On February 15, 2007, a Notice of hritial Study was circulated to property owners within a 500-foot
radius of the project site. The public co=ent period ended on February 26, 2007. No verbal or
written co=ents were received from the public regarding the proposed project or planning process.
On March 29. 2007 a Notice of Availability of the Proposed Mitigated Negative Declaration for the
proiect was posted in the County Clerk's Office and circulated to property owners within a500-foot
radius of the proiect site. The 30-dav public co=ent period closed on APril 30. 2007. No written
Jlublic co=ents were received during the public review period.
E. Identification of Environmental Effects
An hritial Study conducted by the City of Chula Vista (including an attached Environmental
Checklist form) determined that the proposed project would not have a significant environmental
effect because of mitigation measures incorporated into the project, and the preparation of an
Environmental Impact Report will not be required. This Mitigated Negative Declaration has been
prepared in accordance with Section 15070 of the State CEQA Guidelines.
Aesthetics
The proposed preliminary lighting plan addresses all proposed exterior lighting and types used. The.
proposed lighting includes parking lot lighting, church complex and school buildings lighting, as well
as, walkway and low landscape area lighting. The lighting plan indicates that no lighting rays or glare
will spread onto adjacent or surrounding residential properties.
The applicant will be required to comply with glare regulations (Section 19.66.100) of the Chula
Vista Municipal Code (CVMC). Compliance with the lighting plan and City code regulations will
14-19
~
ensure that no source of substantial glare or light will result that would adversely affect day or
nighttime views in the area. No degrading of the existing visual character or quality of the site and its
surroundings will occur to the surrounding residential properties. No aesthetic impacts will therefore
occur as a result of the proposed proj ect.
Air Ouality
Short-Term
The proposed phased project could result in short-t= air quality impacts associated with
construction and demolition activities. The anticipated length of time of ,the phased
development/construction activities for Phase 1 and Phase 2 is approximately 15 months each and for
Phase 3 is 21 months. The minimal grading of the site, demolition, building construction and worker
and equipment vehicles trips will create temporary emissions consisting of dust, fumes, equipment
exhaust, and other potential air pollutants. Air quality impacts resulting from the construction-related
operations are considered short-t= in nature since construction-related activities are a relatively
short-t= activity.
Demolition/Grading
, Demolition activities are proposed during the following phases:
Phase 1 and 2
Phase 3
Demolition of portions of the existing private school.
Demolition of the parish hall, rectory building and existing church. .
Anticipated amount of demolition materials to be removed: Phase 1 - 304 cubic yards, Phase 2 -
1,120 cubic yards, Phase 3 - 1,520 cubic yards and Post Phase 3 - 828 cubic yards; total of 3,772
cubic yards of demolition materials.
It is anticipated that the amount of grading proposed includes Phase 1 (250 cubic yards), Phase 2 (800
cubic yards), and Phase 3 (250 cubic yards). With appropriate dust control measures to control
fugitive dust generation during grading that includes watering three times daily, emission impacts
would be controlled and lessened to less than significant
Long-Term
In order to assess whether the project's contribution to ambient air quality is cumulatively
considerable, the project's emissions were quantified with respect to regional air quality.. The
proposed phased project once developed will not result in significant long-t= air quality impacts.
The project generated traffic volume would not result in significant long-t= local or regional air
quality impacts. No area source or operational vehicle emission estimates will exceed the Air Quality
significance thresholds; therefore, no mitigation measures are required.
Hazards/Hazardous Materials
Asbestos and lead-based paint
The existing school and church building structures may contain asbestos and lead-based paint. Prior
to any demolition activities the presence of asbestos and lead-based paint must be ascertained and
removed if present by a licensed, registered, asbestos and lead abatement contractor in accordance
with all applicable local, state and federal laws and regulations, including San Diego County Air
pollution Control District Rule 361.145, Standard for Demolition and Renovation. The mitigation
14-20
A.
measure contained in Section F below would mitigate potential hazardslhazardous material impacts
associated with the release of asbestos and lead to below a level of sigoificance.
Hvdrolo!!VlWater Oualitv
The preparation of a final drainage study will be required in conjunction with the preparation of final
grading plans. In accordance with the City Engineering Department, the proposed drainage plan shall
be required to demonstrate that existing drainage conveyance facilities will have the capacity to
handle existing and proposed proj ect storm water drainage flows. According to the Engineering
Department, no significant impacts to the City's storm drainage system are anticipated as a result of
the proposed development.
Based upon review of the project design, drainage improvements and fully developed site, the
Engineering Department has determined that there are no significant issues or impacts regarding the
preliminary proposed drainage improvements for the project site. The project proposes the
installation of a storm drain system, filtering treatment system, backflow device and preventor, drain
piping, inlets and conceptual Best Management Practices that include gravel bags, landscaped
treatment areas and improvements to existing drainage facilities.
As designed, the proposed drainage will be directed away from the existing and proposed buildings
including adj acent properties. A final drainage study will be required in conjunction with the
preparation of the project grading plans and must demonstrate that the post-development peak flow
. rate does not exceed the pre-development flows. The proposed drainage improvements shall be
designed in accordance with local and regional requirements. The drainage facilities will be installed
at the time of the site development to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
The applicant will be required to comply with the City of Chula Vista's Storm Water Management
Manual and implement Best Management Practices (BMPs) to prevent pollution of the storm water
systems during and after construction. The applicant will also be required to comply with the NPDES
Municipal Permit, Order No. 2001-01 and other permit requirements, identifY storm water pollutants
that are generated as well as identifY appropriate BMP measures and prepare a water quality study to
be submitted with the final grading/improvement plans to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. These
measures are included as a part of the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (See Section F).
Storm or non-storm water from the project area shall be properly treated and discharged into the City
storm drainage systems in accordance with Federal, State, and Local rules and regulations. No
sigoificant impacts to the City's storm drainage system or water quality are anticipated to result from
the proposed phased proj ect as a result of proposed mitigation.
Noise
To assess any potential noise impacts of the project, a Noise Impact Analysis was prepared by Giroux
and Associates/Environmental Associates, Saint Rose of Lima Catholic Parish Master Plan, Chula
Vista, CAdated February 19, 2007, a copy of which is available for review at the Pla:nning and
Building Department. The results of this analysis are summarized below.
Noise Standards
The acoustical analysis assessed the school activity noise generation with respect to the regulations
contained in Chapter 19.68, perfo:r:mance Standards and Noise Control, of the Chula Vista Municipal
Code (noise control ordinance) and the noise element of the Chula Vista General Plan. Pursuant to
1 4- 21
5
the noise control ordinance, no person shall operate, or cause to be operated, any source of sound at
any location within the city or allow the creation of any noise on property owned, leased, occupied, or
otherwise controlled by such person which exceeds the established noise level limits (C.V.M.C. S
19.68.030(A)(4)). The noise level limits of the noise control ordinance vary by land use receptor
category and time of day (daytime versus nighttime). Per Section 19.68.030 (B)(4) of the noise
control ordinance, if the ambient noise level exceeds the established noise level limit, then the
allowable noise exposure standard shall be the ambient noise level. The existing and potential future
noise-sensitive uses adjacent to the project site potentially affected by project-generated noise consist
of single-family and multi-family residences to the north and east.
Short-term Construction Noise Impacts
Construction activities have the potential to cause short-t= noise impacts to noise-sensitive uses
adjacent to the project site (i.e., single family residences and multi-family residences). Noise
produced by construction equipment varies substantially depending upon the type of equipment being
used and its operation and maintenance. With each development phase it can be expected that
diverse noise levels will occur as a result of demolition, site preparation and construction activities.
Construction noise is exempt from the noise limits specified in Section 19.68.040 of the Chula Vista
Municipal Code. However, pursuant to Section 17.24.050(1) of the Chula Vista Municipal Code,
construction work in residential zones that generates noise disturbing to persons residing or working
in the vicinity is not permitted between 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m. Monday through Friday and
between 10:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. Saturday and Sunday, except when necessary for emergency
repairs required for the health and safety of any member of the community. Compliance with the
Municipal Code will ensure that surrounding residents will not be disturbed by construction noise
during the most noise sensitive periods of the day.
School Atmosphere
Although construction noise is exempt from the levels specified in Section 19.68.040. Construction
noise levels were estimated in order to assess potential impacts to on-site receivers (e.g., students and
faculty). Cumulative worst-case levels associated with construction equipment were calculated for
the closest sensitive on-site receptors that include the phasing areas (i.e., classrooms/school buildings
or church facilities). The City of Chula Vista does not have fixed operation standards for these types
of construction activities, however, assessment is discussed below.
According to the noise study, construction activities are scheduled around the school calendar.
Temporary barriers are proposed for blocking out any temporary noise impacts. Because the school
administration oversees the construction scheduling and school operations, there is full discretionary
authority to control the potential short-t= construction noise upon the school environment.
Although the City does not regulate construction noise during the day it should be noted that if noise
levels are found to be excessive enough to disrupt classroom activities, or impact students or teachers
in the classrooms or church buildings, onsite temporary noise barriers or other noise abatement
measures shall be implemented on a case-by-case basis to provide adequate attenuation to the affected
phased areas to the satisfaction of the City Environmental Review Coordinator.
Long-term Operational Noise Impacts
Existing traffic along H Street and Third Avenue was identified by the noise study as the primary
generator of ambient noise. Buildout traffic volumes were obtained from the project traffic study in
order to det=ine the existing and future traffic noise exposure footprint.
14-22
Ii
Potential on-site noise generators include recreational activities associated with the existing soccer
field, new preschool playground, basketball court, and redesigned student lunch/assembly area.
Based on the noise report, noise associated with the soccer field and student lunch/assembly area will
be adequately attenuated by the proposed location of on-site structures and the distance from the
closest sensitive noise receptors.
The noise study analyzed the. cumulative ambient noise conditions affecting the site and surrounding
area. Traffic generated noise was calculated at being 60dB, whereas the noise from the basketball
activities was calculated to be 58dB Leq. The noise report recommended that by expanding the
easterly perimeter solid wall to a height of 8-feet, potential traffic generated noise impacts would be
reduced to a level below sigoificance.
The preschool playground was also analyzed with the primary noise source identified as being traffic-
generated noise from Third Avenue and H Street. The inclusion of a solid 6-foot high noise wall into
the project design, to shield the playground from ambient plus project generated traffic noise, would
mitigate any potential noise impact.
The proj ect design includes a garden area outside the church to be used as an exterior space for
passive activities. With the proposed project design of an 8-foot high barrier wall, impacts to this
area would be reduced to a level ofless.than sigoificant.
Stationary Noise Sources
Heating, ventilation and air conditioning (IN AC) equipment is proposed on the roof of the church
and school buildings. The noise generated by the machinery could vary depending on the type and
size of the mechanical equipment. Based upon the prelim.inary mechanical plans and lack of complete
noise assessment due to unavailability of final rooftop mechanical plans, the study concluded that
noise generated from the HV AC and rooftop mechanical equipment could exceed the City's noise
standard. Noise impacts related to the outdoor mechanical equipment are considered sigoificant.
Therefore, careful site design to prevent noise impacts to sensitive noise receptors from rooftop
equipment, food service, trash compactor is recommended. In addition, an additional acoustical study
will be required to demonstrate that the HV AC and other roof mounted equipment complies with the
City's noise ordinance requiring that noise be limited to 45dBA Leq at the property boundaries during
nighttime hours and 55 dBA Leq during daytime hours or ambient noise levels, whichever is greater.
The mitigation measures contained in Section F below will mitigate potential noise impacts to below
a level of significance. These measures are included as a part of the Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program.
Public Address System/Bells
Typical noise sources generated from school facilities and sports events include public address
systems and bell signal systems that are essential to a school facility. The City of Chula Vista Noise
Ordinance, Section 19.68.050, regulates these signaling devices. The school and church shall be
required to comply with the City's Municipal Code Section 19.68.050, allowiog the church and
school to operate the bell as a signaling device and limits the sounding of these devices to no more
than two minutes continually in any 60-minute period or intermittent sounding over a five-minute
period in any hour. No significant noise impacts are expected to occur to any residential receptors as
a result of the operation of the public address system or bell signaling system.
The mitigation measures contained in Section F below will mitigate potential noise impacts to below
a level of significance. These measures are included as a part of the Mitigation Monitoring and
14-23
7
Reporting Program.
Traffic/Circulation
To assess the potential traffic/circulation impacts of the project including proposed phasing, Rick
Engineering Company prepared a traffic study, Saint Rose of Lima Parish, Master Plan, dated
January 30, 2007 and subsequent addendum dated March 14, 2007. A copy of this study is available
for review at the Planning and Building Department. The results of this analysis are swmnarized
below.
Significance Criteria
The criteria utilized to determine if a traffic impact at an intersection or major street segments is
considered significant are based on City of Chula Vista traffic and circulation standards. Both project
specific and cumulative impacts can be significant impacts. The level of service for unsignalized and
signalized intersections were based upon methodologies descnbed in the 2000 Highway Capacity
Manual (HCM). Levels of services are based upon ADT thresholds outlined for roadVvaY
classifications. The levels of services are only applied to circulation element roadways and hot to
residential streets as they serve abutting lots, not carrying through traffic. The roadway capacities
utilized in the daily roadway segment analysis are in compliance with the General Plan Update.
Existing Conditions
Existing traffic analysis was conducted during peak hour and worse case scenarios of school and
church activities, including evenings. Calculated peak hour traffic within the period of each nearby
intersections, major streets, project driveways and turning movements were utilized in the study. The
existing traffic generated an average of 1,502 average daily trips (ADTs) with 407 AM peak hour
trips and 146 PM peak hour trips during a typical weekday. This resulted in an estimated trip
generation rate of 4.39 trips per student. Existing Sunday traffic generates 3,299 average daily trips
(ADTs) with 694 peak hour trips, equaling a rate on.59 trips per mass attendee.
School Pick-Up/Drop-OjJProgram
The school drop off peak period ocCurs 7:45 a.m. - 8:00 a.m. and the school pick-up peak period
occurs 2:45 p.rn. - 3:00 p.rn. Essentially the peak periods occur 15 minutes before the classes begin
and 15 minutes after classes are dismissed. It should be noted that queing during the school pick-up
period is maintained on-site to avoid stacking of vehicles on Alvarado Street during peak hour. The
combination of the existing traffic control monitoring (4-5 personnel) and the student pickup system
will continue after completion of the phased development and total buildout and will ensure the
smooth flow of vehicles.
Proiect Trio Generation
The analysis of the phased conditions' with the addition of the buildout phase provides an assessment
of the worse case scenario. The proposed project would generate traffic as follows, once buildout is.
complete: phase ill, 1,756 trips for weekday/school and 5,385 total trips for Sunday peak mass
attendance. This is 254 additional weekday/school related trips, and 2,086 additional peak mass
attendance trips than previously existed.
14-24
R
Cumulative Analysis
Cumulative potential impacts from foreseeable projects were also evaluated in the traffic study. In
this case, four projects within the project area (Urban Village, Seniors on Broadway, Gateway Center
and Espanada) were analyzed. The analysis showed the worse care scenario of existing plus
cumulative projects plus project traffic volumes of unsignalized, signalized intersections and major
roadway segments.
Level of Service (LOS)
Project Access Levels of Service
AI]' project intersections, major street segments and traffic .volumes under existing project and
existing plus project weekday conditions are expected to continue operating at Level of Service C
(LOS) or better during the AM and PM peak hours. Except for existing and project plus cumulative
conditions, turning in and out of H Street driveways have the potential to create a significant impact. .
However with project redesign and traffic mitigation measures, that include adequate signage and
striping to proluoit left turns outbound and inbound at the H Street driveways, potential traffic
impacts are lessened to a level ofless than significant.
Parking Requirements
An analysis of the parking required for each phase of the project was completed. During each phase
and buildout the proposed parking asnoted above in the Phasing and Parking Tables will satisfy the
City Municipal Code. The project applicant proposes to provide 165 parking spaces, during interim
phases prior to completion of the church. Upon completion of the phased master plan development
the on-site parking areas will provide 170 spaces. The remaining required parking spaces are
proposed as off-site parking.
The project proposes a total of 429 parking spaces (on-site and off-site parking) thus complying with
the requirements of the City Municipal Code. The City Municipal Code, Chapter 19, Section
19.62.040, allows for the provisions of off-site parking provided that the property where parking is
proposed is not more than 200 feet distance, is pedestrian accessible and subject to a binding
agreement with the City as to the permanent reservation of the required off-site parking.
The primary area identified for off-site parking is the Gateway Parking Structures across Third
Avenue, to the west of the project site. The total amount of parking spaces in the Gateway parking
structure available to them is approximately 700 spaces. Sunday peak hour demands will be met
through the provision of off-site parking. The applicant will be required to submit the binding
parking agreement to the City prior to Phase 1 as noted below.
Prior to Phase I:
As conditioned on the project, the applicant will be required to submit a contract showing the
allowance of the off-site parking areas for parking use prior to issuance of any entitlement permits
including grading or demolition activities of Phase I. All required off-site parking spaces shall be
provided during this pre-phase.
Phase I to Phase 3/buildout:
No additional parking requirements are required during these phases. In the event of any project on-
site condition changes or off-site parking area changes, the project will need to be reevaluated to
14-25
"
..__.----------~_... --..
identify and ensure alternative off-site areas meet the requirements of the City Municipal Code and
provide the required parking. In addition, all phased development and/or construction activities shall
cease until appropriate required parking has been met. If significant changes occur, additional City
discretionary and CEQA review may be required.
The mitigation measures contained in Section F below will mitigate potential traffic impacts to below
a level of significance. These measures are included as a part of the Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program.
PedestrianITraffic Safety
Phase I to Phase IIIIbuildout
In view of the fact that a significant percentage of the required parking for Sunday services is
provided off-site, special consideration to pedestrian safety and proper traffic circulation between
those off-site parking areas and the project site must be given by the applicant. With this in mind,
proj ect design and City Engineering requirements and measures have been incorporated into the.
proposed project. These include the widening of all driveways to the City requirement of 24-foot
width and preparation of a traffic management plan to facilitate pedestrian and vehicular traffic
during the Sunday services and special events. Educational programs will need to be provided to
church members regarding proper crossing of H Street or Third Avenue encouraging the use of
signalized intersections or designated crosswalks. Continuation of proper driveway accesses,
educating the parents to utilize the Alvarado Street driveways as the primary school entrances for
student drop-off and pick-up and traffic control personnel monitor traffic on-site and minimize queing
on the adjacent streets during these period will all contribute to creating a safe environment for
pedestrians.
Buildout
In the event the proposed project schedule is accelerated resulting in project completion without
phases, all traffic mitigation measures, including off-site parking requirements, and off-site
improvements must be met prior to final occupancy.
The mitigation measures contained in Section F below will mitigate potential traffic impacts to below
a level of significance. These measures are included as a part of the Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting ProgralIl.
F. Mitigation Necessary to Avoid SiPTlificant hnpacts
Air Qualitv
1. The following air quality mitigation requirements shall be shown on all applicable grading, and
building plans as details, notes, or as otherwise appropriate, and shall not be deviated from unless
approved in advance in writing by the City's Environmental Review Coordinator:
. Minimize simultaneous operation of multiple construction equipment units.
. Use low pollutant-emitting construction equipment.
. Use electrical construction equipment as practical.
. Use catalytic reduction for gasoline-powered equipment.
. Use injection-timing retard for diesel-powered equipment.
14-26
1()
------_._-------~---_.,,_. -~ .-_.....
. Water the construction area minimum three times daily to minimize fugitive dust.
. Stabilize graded areas as quickly as possible to minimize fugitive dust.
. Pave p=anent roads as quickly as possible to minimize dust.
. Use electricity from power poles instead of temporary generators during building, if
available.
. Apply stabilizer or pave the last 100 feet of internal travel path within a construction site
prior to public road entry.
. Install wheel washers adjacent to a paved apron prior to vehicle entry on public roads.
. Remove any visible track-out into traveled public streets within 30 minutes of occurrence.
. Wet wash the construction access point at the end of each workday if any vehicle travel on
unpaved surfaces has occurred.
. Provide sufficient perimeter erosion control to prevent washout of silty material onto public
roads.
. Cover haul trucks or maintain at least 12 inches of freeboard to reduce blow-off during
hauling.
. Suspend all soil disturbance and travel on unpaved surfaces if winds exceed 25 miles per
hour.
HazardsIHazardous Materials
2. During any demolition activities, a licensed and registered asbestos and lead abatement contractor
shall perform asbestos and lead-based paint abatement in accordance with all applicable local,
state and federal laws and regulations, including San Diego County Air Pollution Control District
Rule 361.145 - Standard for Demolition and Renovation.
Hvdrology/Water Qualitv
3. Prior to the issuance of a grading permit, a final drainage study shall be required in conjunction
with the preparation of final grading plans and must demonstrate that the post-development peak
flow rates do not exceed the pre-development flows as indicated in the Preliminary Hydrology
Study dated December 20, 2007, and as determined to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Additionally, the City Engineer shall verify that the final grading plans comply with the
provisions of California Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Region Order No.
2001-01 with respect to construction-related water quality best management practices. If one or
mote of the approved post-construction BMPs is non-structural, then a post-construction BMP
plan shall be prepared to the satisfaction of the City Engineer prior to the commencement of
construction. Compliance with said plan shall become a p=anent requirement of the Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program.
4. Prior to commencement of grading, temporary desilting and erosion control devices shall be
installed. Protective devices shall be provided at every storm drain inlet to prevent sediment from
entering the storm drain system. These measures shall be reflected in the grading and
improvement plans to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and Environmental Review
Coordinator.
14-27
11
--------- _._-~-_._-_..--
Noise
The following noise mitigation requirements shall be shown on all applicable demolition, grading,
and building plans as details, notes, or as otherwise appropriate, and/or shall be made conditions of
project approval where appropriate.
5. Pursuant to Section 17.24.050(1) of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, project-related construction
activities including demolition shall be prohibited between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 7:00 a.m.
Monday through Friday and between 10:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. Saturdays and Sundays.
6. If noise impacts are identified by the church and school administration during construction
activities, the applicant shall be required to comply with the appropriate mitigation measures
identified in the noise study. The measures may include temporary ceasing of construction
activities, installation of construction noise barriers to provide noise attenuation for noise impacts
to the affected classrooms, school and/or church buildings. In the event of construction noise
impacts to the phased classrooms or church buildings, noise barriers shall be placed between the
construction activities of the current phase and the impacted buildings of any previously
completed phase. Temporary construction barriers shall be constructed to the satisfaction of the
City Environmental Review Coordinator. A noise monitor during construction should be onsite
during these affected phases.
7. It is recommended that the school, parish hall and church buildings contain air conditiouing
systems to allow for window or door closure to offset any ambient traffic noise in accordance
with the noise study prepared by Giroux and Associates, dated February 19, 2007.
8. Prior to approval of building permits, the applicant shall submit a subsequent noise study to the
satisfaction of the Environmental Review Coordinator demonstrating that the final roof-mounted
HVAC and other roof mounted equipment complies with the City's noise control ordinance at the
property boundaries of 45 dBA Leq (one hour) during nighttime hours and 55 dBA Leq (one
hour) during daytime hours or ambient noise levels, whichever is greater. Upon review of the
additional noise analyses, if it is determined that there are potential noise impacts created by the
HV AC or other roof mounted equipment, then applicable mitigation measures shall be developed
to insure these impacts are lessened to a level ofless than significant.
9. All rooftop pumps, fans, and air conditionerslheating units on the church and school buildings
shall include appropriate noise abatement and be screened by a minimum three-foot high rooftop
parapet that blocks the line-of-site view from the backyards of the nearby residential properties to
the exposed roof and mechanical ventilation systems.
10. A 6-foot high solid noise attenuation wall shall be constructed around the preschool playground
along Third Avenue in accordance with the noise study prepared by Giroux and Associates, dated
February 19, 2007, to the satisfaction of the City Environmental Review Coordinator.
11. An 8-foot high solid masonry barrier shall be constructed along the eastern property line
separating the basketball courts from the nearby residences in accordance with the noise study
prepared by Giroux and Associates, dated February 19, 2007, to the satisfaction of the City
Environmental Review Coordinator.
12. An 8-foot high solid masonry barrier and stucco wall shall be constructed around the garden area
outside the church in accordance with the development plans (dated March 22, 2007) and noise
study prepared by Giroux and Associates, dated February 19,2007, to the satisfaction of the City
Environmental Review Coordinator.
14-28
12
---.------------.-.
Traffic
13. Prior to demolition or building permits issuance for Phase 1, a binding agreement between the
City and the applicant concerning off-site required parking areas shall be submitted and approved
by the City Planning and Building Department, City Engineer and City Attorney's Office.
14. Prior to occupancy of Phase 3, submittal of a striping and signing plan, prepared by a State of
California licensed traffic engineer is required. ill accordance with the requirements of the traffic
study, dated January 30, 2007, the striping and siinage plan shall analyze the need for signing
and striping of a left-turn restriction movement for inbound and outbound traffic onto H Street. If
it is determined that signage and striping are required, the installation of the required signage and
striping shall be completed by a licensed Caltrans-certified traffic control contractor to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer and at no cost to the City.
15. ill the event, any off-site parking property owners are unable to provide the additional required
parking spaces, or meet their contractual agreement or in the event that significant project
modifications occur then, additional discretionary review and environmental review, in
accordance with CEQA, may be required.
16. ill the event that the project is completed without phases, all mitigation measures and off-site
improvements shall be met prior to final occupancy of the project to the satisfaction of the City
Planning and Building Department and City Engineer
G. Consultation
1. illdividuals and Organizations
City ofChula Vista:
Benjamin Guerrero, Planning and Building
Marisa Lundstedt, Planning and Building
Luis Hernandez, Planning and Building
Jeff Steichen, Planning and Building
Mary Venables, Planning and Building
Brad Remp, Planning and Building
Carolyn Dakan, Planning and Building
Emily Novak, Planning and Building
Frank Rivera, Engineering
Silvester Evetovich, Engineering
Hasib Baha, Engineering
Jim Newton, Traffic Engineering
Dave Kaplan, Traffic Engineering
Sandra Hernandez, Engineering
Anthony Chukwudolue, Engineering
Justin Gipson, Fire Department
Richard Preuss, Police Department
Dave Byers, Public Works/Ops.
14-29
13
Aoolicant/Prooertv Owner:
St. Rose of Lima Parish of the Catholic Diocese of San Diego
Ae:ent:
David Pfeiffer, Principal AIA
Dominy and Associates, Architects
Others:
Sweetwater Authority
Chula Vista Elementary School District
2. Documents
City of Chula Vista General Plan Update, 2005
Title 19, Chula Vista Municipal Code
Noise hnpact Analysis for Saint Rose of Lima Catholic Parish Master Plan - Chula Vista, CA,
and dated February 19, 2007 (Giroux and Associates)
Traffic Study for Saint Rose of Lima Parish Master Plan and dated January 30, 2007 (Rick
Engineering Company).
Preliminary Water Quality Technical Report/Water Demand Exhibit for Saint Rose of Lima and
. dated December 20, 2006 (Rick Engineering Company).
Preliminary Sewer Study for Saint Rose of Lima and dated January 25, 2007 (Rick Engineering
Company)
Historic Architectural Survey Report for Saint Rose of Lima Parish and Parochial School- Chula
Vista, San Diego County, CA and dated May 2006 (Galvin Preservation Associates).
Initial Studv
This environmental detennination is based on the attached Initial Study, and any comments
received in response to the Notice of Initial Study. The report reflects the independent judgment
of the City of Chula Vista. Further information regarding the envirqnmental review of this
project is available from the Chula Vista Planning and Building Department, 276 Fourth Avenue,
Chula Vista, CA 91910.
Date: M'fh' "5) 200 7
Guerrero, Environmental Projects Manager
J:lPlanninglMARIA \Initial Study\St Rose of LiimalIS-06-013fina!lMND.doc
14-30
14
EX#IBrr A
14-31
~.J_.\'P"O
tpmt()~~=:rlo:lsO){~S
! .
"i ·
~. -j
~! tl
~Ph
BllUUm
Ii H..oo'
~immm
a;
...
~HHwH,
~
il'...;;' ...
~ il! 1
<( -..< .~<.ll
a: ..; ..; '::i:i ~ s:z:z " cii::! .::! II
~ l!)iri ~~~ ~I i J~ IJI 1 ]' Jl 1
Ii ;IIJil !Ii'll
~ ~1 !~ll. ! ~ d I~hlql
~H ud!l~i,!Jd,lq
I . A
II . l ~
!i! w tll ~ :i S S 'j
ili~llil: il ~!IH;
II i illl! i f i ~ J I ~ ll!li
;! J IIIIII ~ j ~ I ] 'I lil ~ I'
~iUHJjliJliHhl! ill! I ~ i I il
~1'PI&lll 'Pilil il'PI i i ilh
il';r;;, ;t
1il ~ cii:i ~ ~ :i
n l ~ ::l. , I .
H!'$J'J"J'1
-II j. ~ I I
J! di I I f i
a l';. ~ a t J
~!! jii:! f!lI I
III iiP f fHh
! I "' · . I
i j i II
- ,i I -Ill
; II I J 111.1
i ;; IHlh! I It Ifi!f
I ~ iilHII! I if ;lItl
;..
p
~
~
,~
I ~ ~ -i~ - ~ -. 1.". - -
--=i.=-?------=--..!........,~ --- -----=--~~=:~-=- --=-- -
-----~- --
~
,
.
C
.
.
,
1
EB
1111 J!
I; ~
IIi
.1.
~IIIl
till
t
ga~
1.,.,.,,:16
"'~
in7J.
;Q:~
-J i f
..--~
ATTACHMENT "A"
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM (M:MRP)
ST. ROSE OF LIMA CHURCH AND SCHOOL ADDITION - IS-06-013
This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program has been prepared by the City of Chula Vista
in conjunction with the proposed St. Rose of Lima Catholic School and Church Complex project.
The proposed project has beeri evaluated in an Initial StudylMitigated Negative Declaration
prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and City/State
CEQA Guidelines (1S-06-013) The legislation requires public agencies to ensure that adequate
mitigation measures are implemented and monitored for Mitigated Negative Declarations.
AB .3180 requires monitoring of potentially significant and/or significant environmental impacts.
The Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for this project ensures adequate
implementation of mitigation for the following potential impacts(s):
1. Air Quality
2. Hazards/Hazardous Materials
3. Hydrology and Water Quality
4. Noise .
5. TransportationlTraffic
MONITORING PROGRAM
Due to the nature of the environmental issues identified, the Mitigation Compliance Coordinators
shall be the Environmental Review Coordinator and City Engineer of the City of Chula Vista.
The applicant shall be responsible to ensure that the conditions of the Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program are met to the satisfaction of the Environmental Review Coordinator and
City Engineer. The applicant shall provide evidence in written form confirming compliance with
the mitigation measures specified in Mitigated Negative Declaration 18-06-013 to the
Environmental Review Coordinator and City Engineer. The Environmental Review Coordinator
and City Engineer will thus provide the ultimate verification that the mitigation measures have
been accomplished.
Table 1, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Checklist, lists the mitigation measures
contained in Section F, Mitigation Necessary to Avoid Significant Effects, of Mitigated Negative
Declaration IS-06-013, which will be implemented as part of the project. In order to determine if
the applicant has implemented the measure, the method and timing of verification are identified,
along with the City department or agency responsible for monitoring/verifying that the applicant
has completed each mitigation measure. Space for the signature of the verifying person and the
date of inspection is provided in the last colunm.
J:\PlamrlnglMARIAlInitial StudylSt Ros. of Liima\JS-06-013MMlU'text.doc
14-33
'"
~
o
cb
o
0.
"
o
'"
'C
~
-0
o
.c:
"
CJJ
"C
"
'"
.c:
f2
::J
.c:
(.J
'"
E
::;
-
o
'"
Ul
o
rY
E
'"
~
"
."
.8
"
o
::;:
"
o
~
::E
....
CIl
:a
'"
....
'"
"
:E
.;,;5
-'" _lD
._ 0. "0
08'15 ijj 1::
:;:..;:: Q) ,Q)
cQ)E;O)E
B OJ 1: .!:,t::
=.6mcca
c.ac.5a.
Q." ,,-'" "
<CWc;:In.O
><
'"
'" '"
.r:'"
",,,
.!'].!!!
,,0.
"",
E.E ,.
e:2.B
'5~'~
CT,' 0;,-
e -g e
c ro, c..
0,'';' C.
:.;;;J 0) (lJ
~.5_'a)
:.;;;1"0'12
-~i;
E 01, CD-"
E;-.!!!,s
-..a,0'
~Bu)
C"=.CCJ-.
.!:::- 8: ~
t'lJ as.
O)~ CI)
"-,,
~ ~,o
..Qol:
ocvf
~ ~$'
.r:.r:"
r-Ul""
"
a.
'"
:3
E
a
c
o
'"
~--~
8"5
"'c
::J"
OE
~.9-
:m,g.
::J"
E"
0;0
~:a
E.5
-'"
""
~g
~ B
8.u"C
'" ~ "
6-. a. '-
~ ~ ~
g c g,
o ~ "
.s 0..5
(I) '5 Q
c tT ..
8 Q) gJ,
'" c ~
c 0 .2
., g is
E ~ :;:::I
.f ~ g
~ g al
-=B.E
&. ~ ~-E
3: Q) .e Q)
.QQ;B~
~. m ~'5
J:J=>:5
.
. . .
"0
I
".
Q;
'"
"
'5
~
.E
E
.l!I
!
'"
c
_E
'9
"
o .
"'-
0"
""
C'E
- 0.
~'3
::>iif
.
14-34
""
0;
""
gj
E
'"
"
!
,s
E
"
E
"2
E
'"
!
"'....
"'-
c"
g-o
0"
::J>
..bE.
"''''
".o!
g ,,-
".!:!
,sE
~"2
".-
1iiE
$:..9
.
..9
"
:a
0;
i3
0.
'"
'"
>-
~
:3
tT
gj
'" .
",-
,,'"
~::J
",-0
"'C,~
-82
~'"
",.o!
~~
:is];
S.5
OlE
.
.9
"
:a
0;
l'l
0.
'"
'"
>-
~
:3
tT
'"
'"
'"
"0
'"
e
c
,,- .
a~
E"O
,,"
o..!:!
"E
>"2
"'.-
a.E
.
1:-
~
o
0.
E
$
a
""
gJ.!!!
~~
u; "ca'
~i;
0_
0.-
Ol' gi
~:2
0.:3
E""
00>
J::.E
b:;
.,,"0
:S~
0..9
.!!!e!
""
""
:3&
0;0
E=
".0
-"
co.
;;:.9
o~
-0
";:
~o.
d,g
0_
~'"
_c
"'0
.!!!'ij
0);2
,s-
,,'"
>c
",g
~-ctt-
Oc
:US
N"-
='"
:E:s .
S",~
"'0."
>0- Q)
c.~-g
~~e
.
.
i5
1i.
c
e
0.
'"
"0
"
>
'"
0.
'"
..9.
-'"
"-0
1l'"
are
=g,g
.0
l!.:;:J
,,0.
.r:"
UlO
~~
-c
ill"
.r:-"
"'."
=.:2
"'''
<;;>
.5.9
.
.Q
:a
::J
0.
-0
~ai
!!I 0
"'''
..b,~
.9.~.
.58
-.....,0
9c'-'
u <D_
e$
_::J
".5
1iE
'00
'>(')
>-.5
~E
,,'"
1!;'19
E"
" !
0::<;;
a
""
c
"
"""
:5. ~
1tt~
-"
.5::J
o C
0.0
"'-
"'''
1l ~
",'"
c.!!!
0.Q
",.r:
g.'g!,-d
...b >. ~
~- C ::J
g~ 8
0>.0
-="''''
=-0'"
.r:~.r:
"'0'"
;3:~
Q)-5~
>"'::J
>"'"
.
.
-
,
"
'"
"
""
c
~
0.
..9
:gcr.i
" "".
g~
gg
'iii.-g
8,0,;
"0
s'g
,,-
-E .!!
,,$
0.'"
cE
.5!!~,
0=
s'"
~Q
,,"5
"00
>ij
J:~
'0 i
'" >
" [
g OJ 3 ~
.- c c::J.
N= 0,0
::~Q)f
U).c > Q)
t\1al'lSc..
..9:!c..bCl)
.....C"OCD
m::se=
e"9 lIS E
:a.:g. BIJl
e ,. eN.
(ij:t.m"O
E..9 -e OJ
.....o::s B
OB:m~
1J::J-O
'O"C=~.
.s e g.5'
o=~
"'3....ca-
tt1"E"Cu.;
-::~15B
OJ..o c..tt1
filE~~
U.;CDU)
.
. .
"
:8
'0
"C
<{
o
o
.c:
o
(f)
"C
"
'"
.c:
2
::J
.c:
()
'"
E
::J
-
o
"
'"
o
0::
E
~
"
.;::
..9
'c
o
:2:
"
o
~
'"
:E
'"
~
o
,
<D
o
<.!1
.....
Gl
:c
lU
I-
'"
"
:E
~~
b"O.o
C:lc:;:" 0).....
:0::. cu lii.g ai
""'E'."E'
.1l.S-E "-E
=Ccu.5ca
g;.ffi g. g> g.
<(~.owo
'"
e B c
"* E"fij t:g
'5.g"E"C~:g
eQ)8~:.2E
:b 0. ~'T olD
lij.'iii '" 11 0. '2
:O-5i.=J!!~.g
~ .... ai-1!!':b"E
16-~E Q)'C cu.
o . Q),-o":3-o
.=ga;,s!os
ctt c.a -C.O s
'-., 8 cu.. CO UJ
~'_-c:-~ g'J
;;J- c'caB--tO
"5IO'a.jgQ."<t
15 Eu,CI) c......
~ tJ', ~';": 8J co
C..c (U-B~C)C")
8 \'q fT:.Q'.s S!
=-O:'''C'a)''O::J
o a:l:ca.-:3O::: .
E ~ ~--9o -' 6
~"C-C 005:50",
'-" c c:=-- [tI
>-ctictlo.CIJ.!!!>
ffi qJ'tJ) g.l5fl g
.9.9"';":O::=-Q)
gcn,flJtii.$!Ea::
~.8Jj:5'~6-o
ogJrJ"jP!offi
'"
".
:E
"3.2;-
"'.-
.2:>~()
(3 c:;:. c)......
:;:. co S -E ai
'" "'E'"E'
B.5-e lOt:
::::; c: m.5 ra
0.50.me.
Q.-'" " " "
<ta..owo
'" ,
&g (I) p! ro
aI. <<1:= 0. ~= :Q
.~ rot;; II) ci'U~- ffi- m
~~?~' ~tD-ai~cn.9g. I :S~
(ij a.B CD _ Q)=':: 5"20~..!. en C> ~-
iQ)gB~~~~~ca!,C)~&5 Q)2~
m~!'~!B5~~~~_~o.cas~~ai~
_-~ 0"" ElD;;J ~-ao"" E"O 1::-0+>=.5 8':
~~Eg=9gQ)m~=_~~e.9o.e""
"" <D 0' !-o- c= C""= CI.l o.;;I'ClI.... E-Q.:.
Q)o"C a..BCI)a;;JO~'Q)~'~o.oo:::J.
o.l::j1ii-g'i:: cufa c'5'q'",,"'~ g;.e !"CCJ g.g>
C),c:::JQ)~"C~w~b9b~2~~,.~.~
.5~ E-m.-o:>,,'ID.2;o':>=C;= CD,U' cD ffi: 1:1: 0
~'C'-o.';;;.S:!"O:5 u:~ ~ 0'~:5 ::In'CD gCD' ~
~8 ~ ~~c7J:.s CD E'::~ ::ol1a~o ffi~
~1:~~~~-o:581D0.S:!~8~wl:~~-o
_- I:~_'=:-CD'R, a;z co 0" ~ Q) c.
qi~CO~~.5~0>~'~E,c:cb8'~co.
1D~~CD'm::J~col:>ID'- 0CO_~Q
g.3 cD~'u),a li5~~-e-g,O~a.Qo:-2
ttI ar 1:. 1:: 3= ~ -::l:lI' . ' c: Q.co ID [l; a. CD - E 0
::I~SCDOBID_O~'_-c~~&1:8~
0Q)coE~m-o-oI:QttllDo~m_1D ,r.:
~n~~~~~~~sg~~.cc:oEID~
lD=_'_IDC ,;;;~~o 'OOC:lDn~
5~~~E~~~~~lDU0UUgg~c:
00clD~~tt1$mE~~B~2~lD~g
-:: >omj-a; er--:.s~.e o'i.:;~tn'Ui E In ~
.Q -g:5 In 5i -g. 0 ~ ID 1a g' c: ~ -c: C::.0:2 E ~ =
~tno&-o~~wsu58~88m8a.~
14-35
'"
"
:E
"5'~
"'.-
~ti (J .
(3 I: ~ 8>1:
:::. co Q).c Q)
""'E'<DE'
1l.S-E "'-E
=' I: m_S,.m
~S~ac..
Q.-'" '" '" "
c:ca.owo
><
><
><
2
en
:;;,
""
"0
.c:",
U"
",<D
",g.
a:.s
'"
" "
. -e c =a
i"'Ot;; ~~
?;-B E.-5 ::0 ..:
e1!.9E=1!.9
0"'" In n 1::o:;;J co
c..CD -:.....;=i.__1:
En fu:"0 -0 o:a
ID= > ID's"I:'"
- co CD'=. U o.g
ti,~ ai aJg:g U
:6, CI):-o -2. ~..~, 3=
co B,CD..l!rCD:;;;l~
~>:Qcnco"
--4) >.4>::::: en
C)'"'O e'E co <D.C'::
-~'C?-oiii:619'
Sl:J~';: 0)"0 I:
E I: "'C'ID,~,lD
(l) 8=ca,Q)::; ~5
U cJ:: E en co....
t: o' (D -- co a. 2
ECDCi),:g-g ECD _-s:
o o'en ,I: I:
~,ffi:>:1:m~w
u-o.!!Q)Q)<D-g
4) 1:"" >J:: >
:5 co Q) 2!.~ 2 ~
C)>c...~<D
..91:15oEEQ)
~==Q)-Q)-.5
.Q"iii"5aitn-oO
d:-8Q:"E ~ffiJi
..f
'"
"
:E
"3.2;-
"'.-
b-oU.
" c:;::. 0-
~ CO' I: I: C
I: C) ~.-~ ~.
B.5'ECl.l-E
= c, co.oS tt1.
~~ g-gg.
<(a..owo
'"
.
"
lli'
'"
>-
'"
"0
-"0
S!Q)~~
en -s:5 CD en
>~''-c':::J~
.!!! m :R 2-e
"");';;3
J:: 0 4>' >- co
913 ..a,.g en
Q) ~ -0. I: .
="'20E
o~:a~tU
::;- 8,:2 E g
0'.-0' ~ ~a;
:g~ iDg'O
-.i~~r:.:ffi
<"! ...!o:ro-o' '.
.... "".c:c E
....''=' U) tU' ci
I: e c..E"o
00.0 0
n -~;g 0.0
"'"OEoo~
Cf.) 0 0 I:
.9u-8o,~
1:&0l:::::.!0
cu COlD
:::J:E,'a 0..Q{j
e5~::;"C1:
~::;Ec.,g[ij~
E
l:!
00
."
.s
.c
o
::;:
00
.Q
10
""
~
'"
~
o
cb
o
0.
00
:2
u
-0
<(
"
o
.t::
"
rJ)
-0
00
Ctl
.t::
"
5
.t::
()
Ctl
E
::j
-
o
'"
'"
!?
'"
"
'g
~~
.z;.-cCJ
u.(i:g :?"E
~ ,Q)-c CD
"~i!illi!
~CCtlCCtl
a~' go ~ lit"
~a.owo
x
x
T'"
G>
:c
III
.....
x
.l!l
Ci5
:g"
"0
-"''''
uo
"
00,,-
"''''
a:c
o~Qf~o a 0 6U Q) CI) aiS 3:,::9
o"-ESe:! :;::so:;::r....:5:5UJ .!!='
J:: : '. , CtI''fi 0 :J. CtI" > 0
~'8~ ~5 2 U).EU g-g_au~ij
'CJ n lDQ):g! u)'rg.... ~lU-oS c
c..=oro=._== as E S o.&:; .s ct)-g
tU,j:;::r J!!- -<DCDcocSu
..c:~ai~CI)lD8.....(I)..Q~a8552
~'3.:s!.2.E~ ~ ,0 E"craE - Eli
.co-ino. c.cn-8B 8Zcc:
~.~. ~.5 uj CD ~ ai lii l!! c=.R 8 cD
lDCD_~~~::s! .~~~Q)~CtI~~CD
B.LJ: CtI CI:l._ >"C OlD t:,::J.cw c_ en
>-=a~E~e~CD :..aa.Q0 _3~
..q..c:" CI) ~ c,Ql:5af= ~ e,z."U a.
-ocnCQ) .;O~"CCll.CtlQ)....Q).-....:,"C
~cg3c:;~-!~:5a.~og~
E a ~gt~ i>>~- ..00-(I')'O~..a Q).5~
lD1iE'E,Oc ~<D (D t'lJ c::5 ECI:I
3la.E ,::Jeuoc:..ci:rn,,'Og Q)CD
CD to ',-'_ J:;.c ~ =s -.... ,_ 0 - (I) tI)
<<s Q)'~~ ~'Q)S~:6~3"~.5 ?i5~
~:55.1- 8-5'-g~~~:a.5 en l:: c'ci
o - 0 c a...c: 19 ~ CO::!2 Cs 0 <( "
cac.... 000 - :;::r ;::
a,.Q 0.,,-:>"'0 c.E !:::; as c c..5' g"':::::I
E ... "'0 0 oJ 0., 0 ~- 0-0
(lJ CO::::l :;::r ,,-'" E'~:;::l t.,.-CI,I-
-J:; ... 0 0 UJo-om~cas
Q)UJQ)U)a~~ -rn2Q)~cac:-
~~:5Q)s~g~Q).5_'Ia.U)~~
gE.cR~~ ~R~~~E 00
"C':=:'O Q)S....CO::tOEQ)G) OG)
-~~co Q~c~o ~5U~
<0
- .___._ __. . _.__.._~_______ ____._______u______._
'" '" '"
" " "
'g :g :E
~~ ~~ '3 ;,
lD-
~-g ~ 0)..... ~-g ~ 0)..... -"'-ou
f5 ro:5.e:5~ ca'as.5 as C3 ~~ ~i:
:0:.. Q)'1: Q)
""'~ "i!" "'~ Q;i! ""'i!"i!
!J.5 .11) !J.5, Q) !J.5 . II)
=: C ~.5!J~= c~.5 (lJ ._,C a:I c: (lJ
~c~Q) ~cc.t>>c. "B:j' go g. ~
c...!!! CD. C Q) c...!!! Q) C Q)
<(D..OWO<(D..OUJO <(Q.;OWO
X X X'
X X X
X X X '"
,
"
..
'"
0..
~ .l!l .l!l
(jj (jj (jj
:g" :g" :g"
"0 "0 110
on -"'u uu
" <.:>" ,,"
""- co. ",g.
"'''' "'"'
0::00 0::" 0::"
..cCD Q) 80).- .s B
2 ~x =~..... c ~ - ~i ~ Q):
::t....c::t ca'Oca-oa:l ::t u) Ci5o.(I) :J :5 ai
tisue ~c'~~'~~~~~~EBI ~ ca(l) ..c
~~~a i:o~~~o~~~oa~- ~. ~~~~
(lJgg,~ Bn~o_..co>~[:JQ)~ ~G)~B€E
=(lJ~,~ =~gEgcoG)~~Q)~g~~ i~i~m~
l!.9.2ii g;~ (1)- c_c.g (I) CD"C~.s;! ....,,2:5 r1 c ~
-"'E",.QE~~(lJm~~8crg~~~~=",(lJ C'~Q)~lD-
(I) 0.0 lD E. lD CD ::!> C 0 - n 0 = aa>:5 0
~s fd ~~:5~ Q),Q;.~,...J g.!!f~c6'"5i+> :al!w'o.cj e
o.rn>.o.-. A",."1?:5o<(...JCDc'CiE'I/J"O "C.CI)II)~"',"'O
~~~~m~S~ocm<(>o=,_~~ 8C:rn'~'~~Q)
8 "'~ -0."<:"" ~ s:: >...... "C ",.,"0 co.s;!:a :5 0 ::J cD .0)00 a...... 8
clD2 c"OcaC:~~"ClD-o.....ecncn .....scoo.~a.
ti~cn(l)a:lQ)~'B~*~~cniO~(lJcn ~~.2=~x
cno~~2c.cnEuO'O~~~~II)ECD~ ~.Q:Jcoo",""
lD:;;:I 0 cn.c. OlcDO<(iD '.,:,C lD:5 CD _ Q)O
:5:Os'o lD .52l O>:5:lfi cc:5.a.o. c: a tU- E .....05
c~C:~~OOI.....~caQ)~lD~On: 1~8s..clDS
~~~~j~~)J!t~~~~g!g Jj~~~lfi .
i~~i~!0"~io~~.Q6.~~I~~~~ cn,,--~;~g~:~
"'0- ~AtU...... 00....:5-'- -. to""~ Ol
as~gBS~~E~g~E~g~CD~~~g..cg~.s;!~~
E 8'-0 c:~ a-g Co U OlE:J o,lD:5!J CD u o.2'm.5> o.cn
E .... a:I U o.cn 11),01: c.'5.,g::J.5 >._:55 0.:J" ,.s-a: c
80')0"oOtUcoE....CI)e.-. s:::~a.CD~O..c.~E.-=o
"'~~@~B C~Eo.ClD~~"CC.....~=o,~:J'c~
Q).5'o q ~Ee5~~OlESSS.a:I~~8lDOE~lD~
....~~ ..... _~_~c~mCD~ccc....5....-.~~
O')=c~"O~'O~Q):J~~>.CD~CDCD-a:I o.C:CD~c
=~~~~~~w5i~~~~cnb5B~~~i~~~~
,.:
14 36
'"
ci
c:
:8
'C
"
<t:
(5
o
.c:
"
en
"
c:
ell
.c:
f2
:J
.c:
()
ell
E
::;
-
o
"
'"
&
E
CIl
~
c:
";::
.8
"",
o
:2
c:
o
:ai
'"
~
C'?
~
o
<b
o
0.
'" '" '" '" '"
" " " " "
:2 :E :E 'g 'g
"5.2;- '5 i- S-'" s-'" S>>
OJ- al_ al- al- OJ'"
-",,, 0 2:--oU -",,,0 -",,,0 -",,,0
o c:~ 01: a ~~,g>c .- C:;;:. 01.... C3~:gg>c (3 c:;;:. OJ""
~ ~ Q)-2 Q) :;;:Ii, cU'c OJ fScui.gai :::::,. Q)"t: CD ::::a (lJ 5j -E :ii
1l.5ij alij " '" ij "ij " '" ij "ij B~ijalij B~ H ij
~.~ .:g ~.s OJ_
_ccucca = c CI:l_ co =a2 ~..~! = g <lIB.co = c cu.5'-(U
lilij Q."QQ. ~~ ar g> go 8:~ go ~ go 8:~ go g> go
.:t-Q)cQ) o.:J!!Q) etD
a..oW,O <(a..OWO <(a..OWO <(Q.OWO <(a. CI wo.
)( )( )(
)( )( )(
)( )( )(
...
Q)
:c
III
I-
"
..!:::i >OlD
"".co;
1-"
~'Q).9
CD 0 (u ~
..c ca- o.l:)
~ 'g ~~ ==
.c::: ::II >. ~ CD
.U) 0-00)"5
= .......3:r- (I)
~ ~U) ~c:::
.cuQ)culij
a "is..!!!, 2 c
:;::1"00.00)
ca o,l: m: E
~1i Q)!L,c
aiU):5]le
::I ~:6 a,S:
~a.-"Cc
~ Q).:3:',~ ,.w
0:5 B.e'~
,I:"'C aI'.!!:! ()
;g5"E'8~
~ e' Q'm;::
J:: ('II C:S~ 0 .
0)"'0 CU -0 C 0
:C2.5cOCii
.... 0 iD cu:g c
8.5::J~J!!=e
d; ~- S E:2 8
<(8~C5m()
'"
"
'g
'S~
al.-
-",,,0
U c:g 0)1::
':;::J.tU a).CO)
B~ij~ij
= c: ('lJ.Eca
a,l::o.oo.
<'t5:~'ail~
)(
)(
)(
..,
,
~
"
p.
.9l
0;
i5"
"0
""'ij
0...
"0.
"'..
0::"
.9l
0;
i5"
" 0
""",
0"
,,"
",g.
a::;c:
..f
~
ui
~
.9l
0;
i5"
"0
""",
0"
" "
",g.
c:~
.9l
0;
i5"
tV o.
""",
0"
,,"
.!S!~
0.."
-g_~~ =a -o'g c
......0 "C .r= B tlJ.~
gCi):5.s ~ ca)(O
-"-"'3'''' ]!"""J1l
"gCl)~B":-~ Q:'j~~
Q) lij.sb' C:S:E C;:>.IJ) 0
:8:5,"E~-G) .a~.c~ ~1ii
= g>Ro:5 to 0 Q)j::;;;l.5
~:Q g ~o -g co ~ffi.9"E
II.! e c:: <i: c: CI:l e 0 0:.....- g
Q.i cu....,. '0 g_...: :u CO a; e 0 u
1: arB ai- g..9 1: i ~c.~ 3:
jg :'1: ~i;.~ 1j'"E:-C__~ai'.92
~I: CD o1f;:a ~ClJ~.a,T'" a;
I: =:E:.=: co g'" I: 0) en ~cr::::
o~gJC) Q) 0 CI)':5 CI) ClJ-
CI) IV .... >-:5 0 unS.~.!1: 219
ClJ 0..:>'..0 ';:: ctI-c ,0..0 I:
E2-E-c.9CI)EI:BI:CI)1D
-c 0..ct1 !'r--,~.>"'O 51:"'@u:' ~
:a E.:g. ~ 0 ~ :g (ij ~ ~ -g 2
CI) CD CI) CI)O, CI) ....r--,....-
-6;0:5 o.~]j -52 8 g.g E:
_ ~ E >-CD I: - 0 0 l;\l _UJ
J::..... -0..... Q) J:: ::J ctI _ U)
oIVP::J~Eo~I:~.S!-
0:6~0ClJI:O~:C ,coo
;!; 21~ Q).. 2~ ~ 8~~-g~
0.... .::::11_..0.... .::::II ","-
"_go<OCI:Q)J::-.;;::CI}_
~ct1 I:u..W~..cO.c;;<l:;O
"'0 -c ~....
13 aRCI) I: t:;....o2 (1).9.9 !R....
I!!O)>-' ctI-g 002- Q)..cO ~~-
a.. I:lD 9en l;\lul5 :6=,gi !ctI:o:;>(lJ
... a1"2' I: -a ~ IV 6 Q) E' en - R.!' I: ,tj' ~ ;t'1=: 6 _
o2Q)~I:~ E~=M~,Q)=ien86 eO)Q)~,=:
Q):Ei'''~~ U)-;:5 ~Q) ~=.= 0-0.1: Q) I: iP:g'~
o-c~, ClJ-$_~5E-~~~~ ~~Q)ctICD
a5,~~~ E~- ~I: ~co:5'--
...::::II :: -c (.),.0 'O.e B ~ ~ 5 -af!:s g -g 0 c. c: ill .
U)~!Q)"O ~=I:~~=~Q)U) a1 '~"O~'!'''''i
~03..:65 _a~~~:5ow'(ij~g~ CD!~~E.=:
....Q)CT,'- E....l::..:!:l(ij-U)J:O)CI:!,'1UQi 0..3., ::J'I:::::l
i:':5e~:D ..cOR.ca',,-'Q) ..E'a)~1: [jf580E""
t: CD .::::IICDtj"O-a....9O'O)."5 -..... -
CD I:.!"O I: U) -S a1 ~.r::. F 1::5 ClJ"2, I: 01:- E ..', I: CD
o.lD.-,Q)- ~ .........- --W I:COCI) 0..0
~Q),m>O) MI:"O, ,~OCl)~~ _"I: 1:'"
-~~el: _W-3c~o"O~~_ ~'o-Q)o~
..E.;:;'O a.UJ ~ ca . CI) J9,~ = c _CI) Q) ~- iU:;:::I 5= c ell
;g.8 to 0..2;- ctI >- "0 0 o.~ aJ ctI"O 0 () a.=e; ctI B Q) E
~~5:6 &..c~~Q)aJ~~~i'CD ~~~~~:~
... d) 0) C ..... '0 ~ gjg !!'O ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CP lD O' 0 ~ CJ
PESaJc' >-ctI....Q)O)~o~~Bo. ~:5g!~~
i$~j~ g~~~~aB2Q)~g ~Q)-I:O-
_ - 0....1: aJ...... "0:5.::::11 -~ as:;:::! c:2 g"CDill-:5
=0 g--EaJ a.Q)ol: o'~:o:;:I 0 ca> ~o~>
'~a a. !5-cQ).!JaJCI)"O=15lt"ta ~o....... ,-;
E oo.g Q) 8.!!!.E c O)~ C"O c-01;; ~ aQi~~B
~.E_CI)O o~oQ)ccaClJQ)oQ)'" ~o:5I:Cc
"Oc' 0) ~cEa -oc.......m ........ coOca
B.E~~..E~.9~CDeE9cE~~CI) Q)Q)~O:;:::l~
......c=="OO~~~30=.::::II~Ba.00CDDQ)E~~
~roo.m3S~5~crCD5E""CI)E50:5mEcoo
~~iimoa..~g!:5~c~58B:5C~~~~g
~
~
'"
~
1
--~_. ---------.-------
E
~
oE
.9
'2
o
::;:
c:
,2
ro
'"
~
'"
~
o
,
co
o
0.
c:
o
'"
'0
'0
<(
'0
o
.c:
"
CJ)
'0
c:
'"
.c:
~
::J
.c:
o
'"
E
::J
-
o
co
'"
o
.....
CI)
:g
<<I
.....
.; ;:
a>= a>
"'" {j
"'.c
.c: In!'CDtU
_a. J!J:6 0.
=;co~
" "-
@ ~'"tl g>>
3: ~.!!.:a
"0'....2=
2!. .0. a. :3
~.E'CDt:Q.
~ 2:6 -g
~~.~i
~_ 0 c C
-o"CaJC
CD C a. tU
e-.(U :3 a:
a.aJ8.c;.
~,,-
~~ca(J...:
10 m_~.~ $
;;E.9(;~
c_ 5 0 C C
Q)~.C !~
~ ~2-:g._
lD:a CD $! C,)
5EE~"O
c:ra~ma
<6
~
~____._.___.___~______.___ ___________ _______u____ _______
o
.g
~
Iii.
~
'"
<$
'0.
'"
]
;:j
'a
o
~
~
'"
a
'"
Ol
I
00
~
-~
14-38
.,-
.
.
.
<<
..
---_.,._-----._..--~ .....--- ....-
~!~
--r-
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
01Y Of
CHUIA VISTA
1. Name of Proponent:
St. Rose of Lima Parish of the Catholic
Diocese of San Diego
2. Lead Agency Name and Address:
City ofChula Vista
Planning and Building Department
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
3. Addresses and Phone Number of Proponent:
293 H Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910
(619) 427-0230
4. Name ofProposa1:
St. Rose of Lima Catholic Church.
5. Date of Checklist:
March 28, 2007
6. Case No.
IS-06-013
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS QUESTIONS:
Less Than
PotentiaIIy Significant Less Than
With
Issues: Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact
Impact Incorporated Impact
I. AESTHETICS. Would the project
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a sceoic vista? 0 0 . 0
b) Substantially damage sceoic resoun:es, including, but 0 0 0 .
not limited to, tress, rock outcroppiogs, and historic
buildings within a state scenic highway?
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or 0 0 . 0
quality of the site and its surroundings?
14-39
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare,
wbich would adversely affect day or nighttime views
in the area?
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
With
Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact
Impact Ixicorporated . Impact
0 0 . 0
Issues:
Comments:
a-b) The project site is located on the comer.ofThird Avenue and H Street, which is idimtified in
the General Plan as one of the official Gateways into the City. In accordance with the City of
Chula Vista Municipal Code and Design Standards, the project as designed with architectural
element to match existing architectural style arid enhanced landscaped treatments would'
ensure that there are no significant aesthetic impacts to this comet of the City. . .The project
site contains no scenic resources, vistas of views open to the public, and is not in proximitY to a
state scenic highway, therefore, would not damage any scenic resources, vegetation, nor historic
buildings within a state scenic highway. .
c) The project site is located within a fully developed area with westem Chula Vista that contains
commercial, office and linrited single fumily and multi-family land uses. The proposed church
and school expansion is compahlJle with the existing architectural design and eievations of the
proj ect site and surrounding areas. The proposed project Would not degrade the visual' character
of the project site or its surroundings therefore'no significant aesthetic impact would occur.
d) The project proposal includes new lighting facilities in the parking lot including lighting
standards a distance of 15 feet from the east property line adjacent to the residences. The project
shallbe required to comply with the light and glare reguhltiolls (Section 19.66.100) of the Chu,la
Vista Municipal Code (CYMC). Compliance with the regulations will ensure thatno supstantial
glare or light would affect daytime or nighttime views In the surrounding area or onto the
adjacent or nearby residential properties; therefore no impact would occur as a result of the
proposed project.
Miti!!ation: No mitigation measures are required.
II. AGRICULTURAL RESOURCES. In
detmnining whether impacts to agricultural
resources are significant environmental effects, lead
agencies may refer to the California .Agr:(cultural
Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997)
prepared by the Califonna Dept. of Conservation as
an optional model to use in assessing impacts on
agriculture and f=land Would the project
14-40
__.._..._____._ __________._n__.._ ,._..__ __.... .._._
-----------..-
Issues:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a) Convert Prime F:u:ml.and, Unique F:u:ml.and, or
Fannhnd of Stitewide Impomnce (F:u:ml.and), as
shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the F:u:ml.and
:Mipping and Moritoring Program of the California
Resources Agency, to non-agcicultural use?
D
D
D
.
b) Conflict with existing zaring for agricultural use, or a
Williamson Act contract?
D
D
D
.
c) Involve other changes in the existing envirooment,
wbich, due to .their location or nature, could result in
conversion ofFannland, to non-agti.cultural use?
D
D
D
.
Comments:
a-c) The project site and surrounding land uses are fully developed, consistent with the ChulaVista
General Plan and zoning designation, and contain no agricuitural resources or designated farmland.
The proposal would not convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Statewide
hnportance tonon-agricultural use and no impacts to agricultural resources would be created as a
result of the proposed project.
Mitieation: No mitigation measures are required.
III.AIR QUALITY. Where aVllilable, the sigoificance
criteria estiblished by the applicable air quality
management or air pollution control district may be
relied upon to make the fullowing determinations.'
Would the project
a) Conflict with or obstract implementition of the
applicable air quality plan?
D
D
D
.
14-41
____ __"_nom. _ . . _____________n _.__n_____________________.__ ---
--------.-----.- ----------.
Issues:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
b) Violate any air qmlity standard or contribute 0 0 . 0
substantially to an existing or projected air quality
violation?
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase 0 0 . 0
of any criteria pollutant for which the project
region is non-attainment under an applicable
federal or state ambient air qmlity standard
(including releasing emissions, which exceed
quantiti>.tive thresholds for ozone precursors)?
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant 0 . 0 0
concentrations?
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial
number of people?
o
o
o
.
Comments:
a-e) See Mitigated Negative Declaration, Section E.
Mitil!:ation: The mitigation measures contained in Section F of the Mitigated Negative Declaration
would Iilitigate potentially significant Air Quality impacts to a level ofless than significance.
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES.
project:
Would the
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or
through habitat modifications, on any species
identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status
o
o
o
.
14-42
Issues:
species in local or regional phns, policies, or
regulations, or by the California Department of
Fish and G.une or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service?
b) Have a substlntial adverse effect on. any riparian
habitat or other sensitive natural community
identified . in local or regional phns, policies,
regulations or by the California Department of Fish
and G.une or U.S. Fish and WIldlife Service?
c) Have a substlntial adverse effect on federally
protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the
Qean Water Act (mcluding, but not limited to,
marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct
=ova!, filling, hydrological interruption, or other
means?
d) Interfere substlntially with the movement of any
native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species
or with established native resident or migratory
wildlife canidors, or impede the use of native
wildlife nursery sites?
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinaoces
protecting biological resources, such as a tree
preservation policy or ordinance?
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat
Conservation Plan, Natural Co=umty
Conservation Plan, or other approved local,
regional, at state habitat conservation plan?
14-43
Potentially
Significant
Impact
o
o
o
o
o
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
o
o
o
o
o
Less Than
Significant
Impact
o
o
o
o
o
No Impact
.
.
.
.
.
Issues:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Comments:
a-c) The project site is located within a designated development area pursuant to the adopted Chula
Vista MSCP Subarea Plan and is fully developed. There are no candidate, sensitive or special
status species, sensitive natural communities or wetlands present within or immediately adjacent
to the project site.
d) No native resident or migratory wildlife corridors or native wildlife nursery sites exist within or
immediately adjacent to the project site.
e) No biological resources are present on the project site and no impacts or conflicts with local
policies and ordinances protecting biological resources would result.
.t)
No impacts or conflicts with local, regional, or state habitat conservation plans would result from
the project since tb.e project site is located in a designated development area pursuant to the
adopted Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan and no biological resources are present.
Miti!!ation: No mitigation measures are required.
v. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the
project
a) Cause a substlntial adverse change in the 0 0 0 .
significance of a historical resource as defined in ~
15064.5?
b) Cause a substlntial adverse change In the 0 0 0 .
significance of an archaeological resource pursuant
to ~ 15064.5?
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique 0 0 0 .
paleontological resource or site or unique geologic
feature?
14-44
d) Distul:b ,my human retD2ins, including those
interred outside of fo:ttnal cemeteries?
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
With
Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact
Impact Incorporated Impact
0 0 0 .
Issues:
Comments:
a) . A Historic Architectural Survey Report was prepared by Galvin Preservation Associates (May 2006) for the
demolition of buildings at the St. Rose of Lima Parish and Parochial School. The project proposal includes
demolishing six of the seven existing buildingS. Five of the seven buildings were constructed more than 45
yearS ago and required evaluation due to their age. These five buildings were originally cons1nicted between
1948 and circa 1955 in the Spaoish Colonial Revival and Modern styles. A sixth building was evaluated
because it would reach 45 years of age at the time of proposed implementation of Phase Two of the project.
This building was completed in 1965 in the Modern style.
In order to assess potential historic resources on the project site, all aspects of historic resource compliance
tmder California State Law for the proposed project that inclu~s resource identification, evaluation for
significance, and determination of effects in accordance with tlle California Environmental qUality Act
(CEQA) guidelines at Title 14 California Code ofRegwations (CCR) S15064.5 and the Public Resources
Code (pRe) 5024 was completed. The study results determined that alterations to the subject pI:operty and
proposed demolition of buildings are not potential" historical resources as defined by the California
Environmental QiIality Act (CEQA) and regionalstandilrds or criteria.
b) Based upon previous site distuIbancel! and existing developed project site, the potential for significant
historical resource impacts or adverse changes to archaeological resource as defined in Section 15064.5 is not
anticipated.
c) Based on the level of previous disturbance to the site and the relatively limited amotmt of additional. grading
for the proposed project, no impacts to unique paleontological resources or unique geologic featores are
anticipated.
d) No humah remains are anticipated to be present within the impact area of the project.
Mitil!:ation: No mitigation measures are required.
VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS - Would the
project:
a) Expose p<,ople or sttuctul:es to potential
substantial adverse effects, including the risk of
loss, injury or death involving:
i
Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as
o
o
o
.
14-45
Issues:
delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo
Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State
Geologist for the area or based on other
substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to
Division of Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.
ii..
Strong seismic ground shaking?
ill.
Seismic-related
liquefaction?
ground
failure,
including
iv. Landslides?
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of
topsoil?
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is
unstable, or that would become unstable as a
result of the project, and potentWly result in on-
or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence,
liquefaction or collapse?
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table
18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994),
creating substantial tisksto life or property?
e) Have soils incapable of adequately suppottiog the
use of septic taoks or alternative wastewo.tet
disposal systems where sewers are not available
for the disposal of wastewo.tet?
14-46
Potentially
Significant
Impact
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
Less Than
Significant
Impact
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
No Impact
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Issues:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Comments:
a-e The project site has been previously disturbed with the construction of the existing church and
school facility, storm drainage and site improvements. The preparation and submittal of a final soils
report will be required prior to the issuance of a grading permit for the proposed project as a standard
engineering requirement. According to the Engineering Department, there are no mown or suspected
seismic hazards associated with the project site. The site is not within a mapped Earthquake Fault
Zone. Therefore, project compliance with applicable Uniform Building Code standards would
adequately address any building safety/seismic concerns.
Erosion control measures would be identified in conjunction with the preparation of final grading plans
and would be implemented dUring construction. The implementation of appropriate and maximum
water quality best management practices (BMPs) dUring construction would be required in accordance
with the Chula Vista Standard Urban Storm Water Mitigation Plan (SUSMP). All portions of the
development area disturbeddmmg construction would either be developed or would be appropriately
landscaped in compliance with the Chula Vista Municipal Code, Sections 19.36.090 and 19.36.110.
Compliance with SUSMP requirements would be ensured by the City Engineer prior to the issuance of
grading permits for the proposed project. Compliance with the City and regional standards would
lessen any potential impact to less than significant.
Mitieation: No mitigation measures are required.
VII. HAZARDS Al'ID HAZARDOUS
MATERIALS. Would the project:
a)
Create a significant hazard to the public or the
environment through the routine trnnsport, use, or
disposal of hazardous materials?
o
.
o
o
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the 0 . 0 0
environment through reasonably foreseeable
upset and accident conditions involving the
release of hazardous materials into the
environment?
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous 0 . 0 0
or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or
waste within one-quarter mile of an exiSting or
proposed school?
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of 0 0 0 .
14-47
Issues:
hazardous materials sites compiled putSuant to
Govemment Code section 659625 and, as a
result,. would it create a significant hazard to the
public or the eavU:onment?
e)
For a project located within an ai1:port land use
plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted,
within two miles of a public ai1:port or public use
ai1:port, would the project result in a safety hazard
for people residing or worlcing in the project
area?
f)
For a project within the vicinity of a private
airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard
for people residing or worlcing in the project
area?
g)
Impair implementation of or physically interfere
with an adopted emergency response plan or
emergency evacuation plan?
h)
Expose people or sttuctw:es to a sigoificant risk
of loss, injury or death involving wildland fues,
. including where wildlands are adjacent to
urbanized areas or where residenoes are
.. intetfuixed with wildlands?
Comments:
a-c) See Mitigated Negative Declaratiou, Section E.
Potentially
Significant
Impact
o
o
o
o
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
o
o
o
o
Less Than
Significant
Impact
o
o
o
o
No Impact
.
.
.
.
Mitie:ation: The mitigation measures contained in Section F of tb,e Mitigated Negative Declaration
woUld mitigate potci1tiaIly significant hazaxdslhazardous materiaIs impacts to level of less than
significance. Tn addition, refer to Section F of the Mitigated Negative Declaration, Air Quality Section,
and mitigation measures.
14-48
__ __. ___ .___...._._______ .___ _._.__ .___________.__..__.___ _____.___._...____ n__________.
Issues:
VITI. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY.
Would the project
. a) Result in an increase in pollutant discharges to
receiving waters (including impaired water bodies
pursuant to the Oean Water Act Section 303(d) list),
result in significant alteration of receiving water
quality during or following construction, or violate
any water quality standards or waste discharge
requirements?
b) Substantially ~lete groundwater supplies or
interfere substantially with groundwater recharge
such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer
volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table
leVel (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby
wells would drop to a level which would not
support existing land uses or planned uses for which
permits have been ~ted)? Result in a potentially
significant adverse impact on groundwater quality?
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the
site or area, including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, in a manner, which
would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or
off-site?
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the
site or area, including through the alteration of the
course of a stream or river, substantially increase the
rate or amount of sUrface runoff in a manner wbich .
would result in flooding on- or off-site, or place
structures within a 100-year flood hazard area which
would impede or redixect flood floWs?
14-49
Potentially
Significant
Impact
o
o
o
o
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
.
o
o
o
Less Than
Significant
Impact
o
.
.
.
No Impact
o
o
o
o
-. ----- ----....---.--..----... ...-------------------~._--_._._-- ..---.----
e) Expose people or structures to a sigoificaat risk of
loss, injury or death involving flooding, including
flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam?
Less Than
Potentially Significant Less Than
With
Significant Mitigation Significant No Impact
Impact IncorPorated Impact
0 0 0 .
. Issues:
f) Create or contribute runoff water, wbich would
exceed the capacity of existing or planned
stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial
additional sources of polluted runoff?
o
o
o
.
Comments:
a-f) See Mitigated Negative Declaration, Section E.
Mitie:ation: The mitigation measures contained in Section F of the Mitigated Negative Declaration
would mitigate potentially significant HydrologylWater Quality impacts to level of less than
significance.
IX. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the
project
. a) Physically divide an established co=unity?
o
o
o
.
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, 0 0 0 .
or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over
the project (ificluding, but not litnited to the
general plan, specific plan, local coastal program,
or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of
avoiding or mitigating an envitonmental effect?
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation 0 0 0 .
plan or natural co=unity conservation plan?
14-50
Issues:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated .
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Comments:
a) The project site and surrounding parcels are fully developed. The proposed remodeling of the chmch and
school facilities would not disrupt or divide the established co=unity because they are part of an
existing p=itted landuse. Therefore, no significant planning and land use irn:Pacts would occur as a
result of the phased project
b) The proj ect site is located in the R3 (Multifamily Residential) Zone and RH (High Density) General Plan
land use designation. The project is consistent with the applicable zoning regulations and land use
designations; therefore; no impacts are anticipated.
c) The project would have no impact or conflict with any applicable adopted environmental plans or
policies and would not conflict with the adopted ChuIa Vista MSCP Subarea Plan, which designated the
proposed project site as a Developable Area.
Miti!!:ation: No mitigation measure~ are required.
X. :MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral
resource that would be of value to the region and
the residents of the state? .
o
o
o
.
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locaJly-importaot
mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local
general pIan, specific plan or other land use plan?
o
o
o
.
14-51
Issues:
Potentially
Significant
lqtpact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Comments:
a-b) The proposed project has been previously disturbed and would not result i11 the loss of availability
of a knownmineral resource of value to the region or the residents of the state and has not been
designated for mineral resource protection by the State of California Department of Conservation.
Therefore, no impacts to mineral resources would occur as a result of the proposed project.
Mitil!ation: No mitigation measures are required.
XI. NOISE. Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of naise levels 0 . 0 0
in excess of smndatds established in the local gen=l
plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of
other agencies?
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive 0 0 . 0
groundbome vibration or groundbome noise levels?
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise 0 . 0 0
levels in the project vicinity above levels existing
without the project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in 0 . 0 0
ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above
levels existing without the project?
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan 0 0 0 .
or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within
two miles of a public airport or public use airport,
would the project expose people residing or working
in the project area to excessive noise levels?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip,
would the project expose people residing or working
o
o
o
.
14-52
_-----------n.-. _ __..~___ __u___ .__.__..____._.._.+__ _. __._.m..._.____.__+_ __.___ .______.___._..__n___. m____.___._._______.______
Issues:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
in the project area to excessive noise levels?
Co=ents:
a-d) See Mitigated Negative Declaration, Section E.
e) The project is not located within an airport land use plan nor within two miles ofa public airport,
or public use airport; therefore, the project would not expose people residing or working in the
proj ect area to excessive noise levels.
f) The project is not located within the vicinity of a private airstrip; therefore, the project development
would not expose people working in the project area to excessive noise levels.
Mitil!:ation: The mitigation measures contained in Section F of the Mitigated Negative Declaration
would mitigate potentially significant noise impacts to a level ofless than significance.
XII. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the
project
a.) Induce subsWltial population growth in an area,
either directly (for exarriple, by proposing new
homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example,
through extension of roa.d or other infrastructure)?
o
o
o
.
b) Displace subsWltial numbers of existing housing,
necessitating the construction of replacement
housing elsewhere?
o
o
o
.
c) Displace subSWltial numbers of people,
necessitating the construction of replacement
housing elsewhere?
o
o
o
.
14-53
~------------'_.<' -.---- .-.-.-...--.--<--.---.---------
Issues:
Comments:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
a-c) The project involves remodeling and expansion of the church and school facilities and does not
propose new residential development that would induce population growth or divide the
established community. Furthermore, no displacement of housing or persons necessitating the
construction of replacement housing or adverse impacts to population or housing would occur as a
result of the proposal.
Mitil!ation: No mitigation me.asures are required
XIII. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project:
Result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated
with the proVision of new or physicilly altered
govemmental facilities, need for new or physicilly
altered govemmental facilities, the construction of which
could cause significant environmental impacts, in order
to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or
other perfoonance objectives for any pubuc services:
a) Fire protection?
b) Police protection?
c) Schools?
d) Parks?
e) Other public facilities?
14-54
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
.
.
o
o
o
o
o
.
.
.
------------------- ---- ----- ..---. ---.-----..--...----.-------... ..---.-.... ....-....
Issues:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
COIDments:
a) Adequate fire protection services can continue to be provided to the site without an increase of
equipment or personnel. The applicant is required to comply with the Fire Department policies for
new building construction, emergency circulation, fire hydrants and fire prevention. The City Fire
Department has determined that the proposed proj ect would not have a significant effect upon or
result in a need for significantly new or altered fire protection services. The City's Fire
performance objectives and thresholds will continue to be met.
b) Adequate police protection services and response times can continue to be provided upon completion of
the proposed project. The City Police Department has determined that the proposed project would not
have a sigoificant effect upon or result in a need for substsntial new or altered police protection services.
The City's Police perfurmance objectives and thresholds will continue to be met.
c) The proposed proj ect would not induce substantial population growth; therefore, no significant
adverse impacts to public schools would result. According. to the Chula Vista Elementsry School
District letter dated January 27, 2006, any facility used exclusively for religious purposes is exempt
from school fees.
d) Because the proposed project will, not induce a substantial population growth; it would not create a
demand for neighborhood or regional parks or facilities or impact existing park facilities.
e) The proposed project would not have a significant effect upon or result in a need for new or
expanded govertunentaIservices and would be served by existing or planned public infrastructure.
Mitil!ation: No mitigation measures are required.
XIV. RECREATION. Would the project
a) 1:i1crease the use of existing neighborhood and
regional parks or other recreational facilities
such that su1:lstantial physical deterioration of
the facility would occur or be accelerated?
o
o
o
.
b) Does the project include recreational facilities
or require the construction or expansion of
recreational facilities which have an adverse
physical effect on the environment?
o
o
o
.
14-55
-- -. ------..--..-------------.----.----.------.-----------
Issues:
Comments:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
No Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact
a) Because the proposed project would not induce population growth, it would not create a demand
for neighborhood or regional parks or facilities. The proposed project will not significantly impact
existing neighborhood parks or recreational facilities.
b) The church and school project contains its own recreational facilities and playground areas and
would not create significant increase or substantial deterioration to existing public parks or
facilities. The project site is not planned for any future public parks and recreation facilities or
programs. Therefore, the proposed project would not have an adverse physical effect on the
recreational environment.
Mitie:ation: No mitigation measures are required.
xv. TRANSPORTATION / TRAFFIC. Would
the project
a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in
relation to the existing traffic load and capacity of
the street systerp. ~.e., result in a substantial increase
in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to
capacity rntio on roads, or congestion at
intersections) ?
b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of
service standard established by the county
congestion management agency for designated
roads or highways?
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including
either an increase. in traffic levels or a change in
location that results in substantial safety risks?
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature
(e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
e) Result in inadequate emergency access?
14-56
o
.
o
o
o
o
o
.
o
o
o
.
o
o
o
.
o
o
o
.
._....___m_._ _ .__...._n __._.__..._ ...-..----..---.--.-.-------.--.. .--~._-- .--...-"". ---..----.--.----.---- _. .-.. ~..-.-------.
Issues:
f) Result in inadequate parlcing capacity?
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs
supporting alteroa.tive ttlInsportation (e.g., bus
turnouts, bicycle racks)?
COlnments:
a-g) See Mitigated Negative Declaration, Section E.
Potentially
Significant
Impact
o
o
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
.
o
Less Than
Significant
Impact
o
o
No Impact
o
.
Mitil!:ation: The mitigation measures contained in Section F of the Mitigated Negative Declaration
would mitigate potentially significant TransportationtTraffic impacts to a level ofless than
significance.
XVI. UTiliTIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS.
Would the project
a) EXceed wastewater trea1ment requirements of the
applicable RegioDal Water Quality Control Board?
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or
wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of
existing facilities, the constroction of which could
cause significant environmental effects?
c) ReqUire or result in the construction of new stOl:lI1
water drainage facilities or expansion of existing
facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects?
d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the
project from existing entitlements and resources, or
are new or expanded entitlements needed?
e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment
provider which serves or may serve the project that it
has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected
demand in addition to the provider's existing
commitments?
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted
capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste
14-57
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
.
o
.
.
.
.
o
.
o
o
o
__.___.__._______. ._______________ __.__...______________.___n___.__._____ ________________...__ ----------
Issues:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
disposal needs?
g) Comply with federal, 8mte, md local stlltutes md
regulations related to solid waste?
o
o
.
o
Comments:
a) The project is located within an urban area that is served by all necessary utilities and service
systems. No exceedance of wastewater requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board
would result nor significant impacts would occur as a result of the proposed project.
b) See XVI.a. The sewer facilities serving the project site consist of 8-inch sewerlines running along
H Street and Third Street. The proposed improvements include the extension of the existing sewer
mains from H Street and Third Avenue, later tyillg in with sewer laterals wi1;hin the project site for
the different phases and separate sc,hool and churcl). building:s. Based upon the preliminary sewer
study for the proposed project prepared by Rick Engineering Company, dated January 25, 2007, the
Engineering Department has determined that these facilities are adequate"to serve the proposed
project and no significant impaCts are anticipated to occur as a result of the proposed project.
c) No construction of new storm water' drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities would be
necessary.
d) The project site is within the Sweetwater Water District service territory. Pursuant to
correspondence from the Sweetwater District dated January 27,2006, the pr()ject site may continue
to be serviced from existing potable water mains. No new or expanded entitlements are anticipated
for the proposed project.
e) See XVI.a. and b.
f) The City of Chula Vista is served by regional landfills with adequate capl!-city to meet the solid
waste needs of the region in accordance with State law. The project is not anticipated to generate a
significant amount of solid waste which would exceed the capacity of the Otay Landfill therefore
impacts to the facility are less than significant
g) In accordance with the Chula Vista Municipal Code, the applicant will be required to implement a
Recycling and Solid Waste. Management Plan and comply with all federal, state and local
regulations related to solid waste. Therefor", impacts are considered to be less than significant.
Mitil!:ation: No mitigation measures are required.
14-58
_ ___.____ ___._. ______.__._________ u_u___..______.___.______.__u ___._____.________________
Issues:
XVII. THRESHOLDS
Will the proposal adversely impact the City's
Threshold Standards?
A.~
The City shall construct 60,000 gross square feet (GSF)
of additional Iibtary space, ovet the June 30, 2000
GSF total, in the area east of Ioterstate 805 by
buildout The construction of said facilities shall be
phased such that the City will not fall belOw the city-
wide ratio of 500 GSF per 1,000 population. Lbtary
facilities are to be adequately equipped and staffed
B) Police
a) Emetgency Response: Properly equipped and staffed
police units shall respond to 81 percent of "Priority
One" emergency calls within seven (I) minutes and
maintain an average response time to all ''Priority One"
emetgency calls of 5.5 minutes or less.
b) Respond to 57 percent of ''Priority Two" urgent calls
within seven (!) minutes and maintain an average
response time to all ''Priority Two" calls of 7.5 minutes
or less.
q Fire and Emergen<;y Medical
Emetgency response: Properly equipped and staffed fire
and meclical. units shall respond to calls throughout the City
within 7 minutes in 80% of the cases (measured annuall:y).
D) Traffic
The Threshold S_dards require that all intersections must
operate at a Level of Service (LOS) "e" or better, with the
exception that Level of Service (LOS) ''D'' may occur
during the peak two hours of the day at signalized
14-59
Potentially
Significant
Impact
o
o
o
o
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
o
o
o
o
Less Than
Significant
Impact
o
.
.
.
No Impact
.
o
o
o
---.-.... .--.------ ------~_..-- -~. --.---.----.--.---.---.-.-... -. -----------------..-------
Issues :
intersections. Signalized intersections west oEI-80S ate not
to operate at a LOS below their 1991 LOS. No
intersection may reach LOS ''E'' or "F" during the average
weekday peak hour. Intersections of artetials with freeway
=ps are exempted from this Stand:ttd.
E) Parks and Recreation Areas
The Threshold Standatd for Parks and Recreation is 3
acres of neighborl:tood and community parldand with
appropriate .facilities /1,000 population east oEI-80S.
F) Drainage
The Threshold Standatds requb:e that storm water flows
and volumes not exceed City Engineering Standatds.
Individual projects will provide necessaty improvements
consistent with the Drainage Master Planes) and City
Engineering Standatds.
G) Sewer
The Threshold Standatds req1ili:e that sewage flows and
volumes not exceed City Engin~ Standatds.
Individual projects will provide necessaty improvements
consiStent with Sewer Master Planes) and City Engineering
Standatds.
H) Watet
The Threshold Standatds requb:e that adequate storage,
treatment, and ttansmission facilities are constructed
cona=ent!y with planned growth and that water quality
standatds ate not jeopwlized during growth and
consttuction.
Applicants may also be requb:ed to patticipate in whatever
water conservation or fee off-set progrnm the City of
. Chula ViSta has in effect at the time of building petroit
issuance.
14-60
Potentially
Significant
Impact
o
o
o
o
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
o
o
o
o
Less Than
Significant
Impact
o
.
.
.
No Impact
.
o
o
o
--_..._--~----,_._-------------_..,-------_._--_... .----.-. .---..-..------.. .._--
Issues:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No Impact
Comments:
a) The project would not induce substantial population growtb; therefore, no impacts to library facilities
would result. No adverse impact to the City's Library Threshold standards would occur as a result of
the proposed project.
b) According to the Police Department, adequate police protection services can continue to be provided
upon completion of the proposed project. The proposed project would not have a sigoificant effect upon
or result in a need for substantial new or altered police protection services. No adverse impact to the
City's POlice Threshold Standards would occur as a result of the proposed project.
c) According to the Fire Department, adequate fire protection and emergency medical services can continue to be
provided to the project site. Although the Fire Department has indicated they will provide service to the
project as desigoed according to the current site plan, the project will contribute to the incremental increase in
fire service demand through the City. This increased demand on fire services will not result in a sigoificant
cumulative inipact. No adverse impact to the City's Fire and Emergency Medical Threshold standards would
occur as a result of the proposed project.
d) According to the traffic analysis, the surrounding street segments intersections will continue to operate in
compliance with the City' s ~c threshold standard (LOS "C" or within identified threshold values) with the
proposed project traffic and buildout conditions. No adverse impact to the City's traffic threshold standards
would occur as a result of the proposed project.
e) Because the church/school expansion project is proposed for infil1 development andJocated west ofTnterstate
805, this TIrreshold Standard is not applicable.
f} The proposed project includes drainage improvements desigoed in accordance with City standards. Based
upon the review of the project, the Engineering Department has determined that there are no significant issues
regarding the proposed drainage impTovemehts of the project site as iTIdicated in the Preliminary HydrOlogy
Study. Tn accordance with City standards, post-de\>'eloped flows shall not exceed pre-developed flows and a
final drainage study will be required in conjunction wij:h the grading plans. No adverse impacts to the city's
. storm drainage system or City's drainage threshold standards will occur as a result of the proposed project.
g) The sewer facilities serving the project site consist of 8-inch sewer lines nmning along H Street and
Third Street. The pr<;>posed improvements include the extension of the existing sewer mains from H
Street and Third Avenue, later tying in with sewer laterals within the proj ect site for the different phases
and separate school and church buildings. Based upon the preliminary sewer study for the proposed
project prepared by Rick Engineering Company, dated January 25,2007, the Engineering Department
has deten:irined that these facilities are adequate to serve the proposed project. No adverse impacts to
the City's sewer system or the Sewer Threshold Standards will occur as a result of the proposed project.
h) Pursuant to correspondence received from the Sweetwater Authority Water District, the existing
8-inch water main located along the frontage on H Street and Third Avenue, as well as a 6-inch water
main along AlvaradO Street currently' serve and will continue to. serve the project site. The applicant
shall be required to coordinate with the Water District for proper desigo guidance of service sizes. No
significaot impacts to existing facility systems or the City's water threshold standards will occur.
Miti!!ation: No mitigation measures are required.
1 4- 61
Issues :
XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF
SIGNIFICANCE
a) Does the project have the potential. to degrade the
quality of the envirooment, subsllln1ially reduce the
habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or
wildlife population to drop below self-sustrining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal
co=unity, reduce the number or restrict the range
. of a tate or endaogered plant or animal or eliminate
impottllnt examples of the major periods of
California history or prehistory?
. b) Does the project have impacts that ate individually
limited, but cumulatively considerable?
("Cumulatively considerable" means that the
incremental effects of a project ate considerable
when viewed in connection with the effects of past
projects, the effects of other cuttent project, and the
effects of probable future projects.)
c) Does the project have enviroomental effects which
will cause subslllntial. adverse effects on human
beings, either directly or indirectly?
Comments:
Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
With
Mitigation
Incorporated
No Impact
Less Than
Significant
Impact
o
o
o
.
o
o
.
o
o
.
o
o
a) The project site is currently fully developed and l<icated in an established urbanized area within the
designated developable area of the adopted Chula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan. There are no known
sensitive plant or aniinal species or cultural resourCes on the project site. No substantiai adverse impacts
would occur as a result of the proposed project
b) No cumulatively considerable impacts associated with the project when viewed in connection with the
effects of past projects, other current projects and probable future projects (Urban Village, Seniors on
Broa<i\vay, Gateway Center, and Espanada) baye beenideIltified. As descnlJed. in the 1:fitigate<i ~egative
Declaration, project impacts would be mitigated to below a level .of significaricetIlrough the required
mitigation measures.
c) See Mitigated Negative Declaration, Section E. Potential impacts to humans associated with the short-
term construction, air quality impacts, hazardtbazardous materials, hydrologyfwater quality, noise,
transportation/traffic would be mitigated to below a level of significarice.
14-62
Mitigation: The mitigation measures contained in Section F of the Mitigated Negative Declaration would
mitigate potential significant impacts to a level ofless than significance.
XIX. PROJECT REVISIONS OR MITIGATION MEASURES:
Project mitigation measures are contained in Mitigated Negative Declaration 1S-06-013, Section F,
Mitigation Necessary to Avoid Significant Impacts, and Table 1, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program.
xx. AGREEMENT TO IMPLEMENT MITIGATION MEASURES
By signing the line(s) provided below, the Applicant(s) and/or Operator(s) stipulate that they have each
read, understood and have their respective company's authority to and do agree to the mitigation
measures contained herein, and will implement same to the satisfaction of the Environmental'Review
Coordinator. Failure to sign the line(s) provided below shall indicate the Applicants' and/or Operator's
desire that the Proj ect be held in abeyance without approval.
John P. Dolan, Pastor
Printed Name and Title
. ..... {}..
I /.
3 'f :z....r. "7
Datel I
SI
e of Authorized Representative
N/A
Printed Name and Title of
[Operator if different from Property Owner]
Date
N/A
Signature of Authorized Representative of
[Operator if different from Property Owner]
Date
14-63
XXI. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at
least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated,"
as indicated by the checklist on the previous pages.
o Land Use and Planning . Transportation/Traffic
o Population and Housing 0 Biological Resources
o Geophysical 0 Energy and Mineral
Resources
o Public Services
o Utilities and Service Systems
o Aesthetics
o AgricultUral Resources
. . Hydrology/Water
. Air Quality
o Threshold Standards
. Hazards and Hazardous
Materials
. Noise
o Cultural Resources
o Recreation
. Mandatory Findings of Significance
14-64
XXII. DETERMINATION:
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project could not have a significant effect on the 0
environment, and a Negative Declaration will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the .
environment, there will not be a significimt effect in this case because revisions in
the project have been made or agreed to by the project proponent. A Mitigated
Negative Declaration will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project may have a significant effect on the environment, 0
and an Environmental Impact Report is required.
I find that the proposed proj ect may have a "potentially significant impacf' or 0
''potentially significant unless mitigated" impact on the environment, but at least one
effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable
legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier
analysis as descnbed on attached sheets. An Environmental Impact Report is
required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a. significant effect on the 0
environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed
adequately in an earlier EIR or Negative Declaration pursuant to applicable stimdimls
imd (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or Negative
Declaration, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the
proposed project, nothing finther is required.
~--
ItA Itt' "3, 200-,
Date
emf
Envi ental Projects Manager
City ofChula Vista
J:\Planning\MARIA\Initial Study\St Rose of Liima\IS-06-013cklstStRose.~o~
14-65
.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. c-63-3
"".;;
RESOLUTION OF T~E PLANNING COMMiSSION
RECOMIiEND fNil TO TflE CliY COIJMCGL
APPROVAL OF A CaNDIT]ONAL USE PERHIT
FIR PERK) S5 I on TO BU.I LO A NEW C!IlI(\cH EAST
.OF EX.ISTnm:'l;filJf\C;~ 2.~..:S "tW ::;i1Rcf:.1 ANU'
TO ADD: OfFfcE SrACE TO EXI~Ti,t.ifIlECTIlI\Y'
. "
WffEREAS..'B duly verifteCl app! icatioR Tor a conditIonal use permi t ~!i fi led
with the P181f1ntn.9 Depar?nant on August 7. 1963 -'''!3nd
tIona1
. WKEREAS. said,litpplicatiori requested tfiat the eppl icant be granted"s' concfi-
U!'$e permit to" allow constructlon of a new church east of the exIsting church
",
and tel add offica '~pace to the eX(~t[~g tr'ectorv..
"
" ,
on property at .293' "fin Street
described h. tha OIppllcationJ' and which :is zoned I\-j
more particularly
.snd
WHEREAS, THe PlannIng Contmi!:i$ion set the tIme mod pl~ce: for a hearing on
$ald applicatlon and notice of said hearTng ~QS given by the maIling of Q Jetter to
property owners 'wl thin 300 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least
ten days ?ri?r ~o the hearing, and, " _ "
. .
, .
WHEREAS. the -hearing was held at the. time and piece, Mmely: 7:00 P.M'. Monday,
I " ,..', "I I f
August 19: 1963 In councIl Chambers. CIvic Ce.ter, Chula Vista
Planning Camml$~(on and said hear-Lng ~as thereafter closed.
before: the
\
IIOW T~REFIRE BE IT RESOLVE~ THAT the Planni.g, C""""I.slon 'fInds a. foll_:
1. "That tha gr.anting of the conditional u~e permit will not be I1'IIIte~r.l1y
detrlmentsI to the public healt~. safety or welfare~
So' stat~d.
2.. The characteristics of' the use proposed are reasonably compatIble with
the type3.of use perm.ltted In the surrouRding areal.
I" , " ,
ThIs Is an ImprOv......t over the old slt~.
BE IT fURTHER RESOLVED that tha'Planning Cc:mnisslon recormnends to, the City
Council that.a c::onditional use permit be granted to' St. Rosa of LIma Parish
,- "
293,1,"11 Str,eet; " for ,permissIon to"construct.s new church and to add office
space: to the existing rectory.. ' . ,
~App~val of thl~ conditional u~e permit i; recommended subject to the followIng
c:ondl tions: . .
.That a S foo-t hIgh masonry wa.l1 be constructed, a.long too easterly property line
I.. of.. the developcDent..
,2.
, ,
That a Jandscap0 plan,be approved by the Planntng Depar~nt.
.'
,
3. "" arkrng spaces sball be surfaced wIth 2 Inch asphaltic concrete and 5 aces
c ear y R'I!Ir.
4.. Entrance on Third Avenue be closed, as far 8S tne curb cut Is concerned..
Virgil D. Steve~onJ Chairman
DATEI1:
ATTEST:
A~gust 19. 1963
14-66
h",,,..^ ('1UM1i'l'.TT 'l
"
,-
.....-t'" ].,...,i ~.,.,r'I' t'R'l Tn :::In..H+;r'ln~ ,..,t"'f'_c::+.r!"!I''''+:' lnaninQ' and unloacUn2' of uassenrers is
--eI1\S"qn,...,.gp" 'h3'" r+r-';~:r::IY<:::! ~l"""'g o.;~~...,.... "rirl'... !"If' t':n~ ~hll,..~h trnm qp R1:; 'tnrnO tn
^,......:......rl'..... <::'+."
Are the chBracte,i5ttc~ of the U~e proposed reasonably compatible with the type of ute~
in the zlI'"ea?
"V"'''''
Section i\l
DAl!D
64 (r~ \-
"") / I '/r.""-.
AT
, .
FOREGOING IS TRUE AlID CO~RECT.
!b\.....5>-_ J,''\,.l':;:-
, C111 iforniij}
a DEClARE, UNDER PENALTr OF PERJURY TlIAT THE
14-67
'"
.)1j ...~"::W
llJ!SOLtrnOll No. 3188
APFIl:OW.I, W THE CITi. COIlNCIL W TlIE CIn' Of! CllIlLA VISTA, CALIFOlllllIA
TO 11iE PLAllllING C0WI88ION ACTION IN GRAl>lTING COIlDITIOl'lAL
USE PEIllfiT TO
ST. ROSE 01' lIMA CHURCa
For cons"truc"tion of new churcJ:J. ..:. a.dd ta of.fice space
WHEREAS)I on August 1.9.. 1963 ti:lB Plana.ing Commission
held a Public Hear1:ng on the appU.catian of St. Res e of Lima Cm.trch
for 4 Coodit1.onal Use Pennit ~ c;.onstruct:ion of: new' church _ add to oifi.ce space
an the prop~rt:y loc:a.t:ecl 29'3 "II" S~reet'
!WI.
illHElt!:AS~ the p1dnn.J""g CoIam1.ssidl1, following said hearing, adapted a
Kesolution::l' l:1itb find1.ngs. 't'02.commend1ng the gr.antlng of sa.1.cl Conditianal Use
perid.t. as.id peride being subject tG l:ertain conditions ~ and
RmlIrR'Aq. pU'suant -to Sectf.on 16.54 of Orclinso.ce No. '398 th~ said.
re.-.........nd.lllt1ou. of 'the p1.'tn....i~g Comadssiou. appeared OD. the Agenda of ~ CitY
Coaa.c.11; and
llIBEItEAS.. the. S"aid City CouDC:i.l has rev1e.ved s.a1.d recCJI!II:lemlat:1.OIl awl
f'fnd4ngs of t:ha l'la~g ~siO!il ancl all doctmleD.ts OD. fl11!l in coune:ction .
witl> said appl1cat1al1 f.., Ccrad1t1oDal Use POrmit,
BOW. 'mIlIlIlll'01IIl. be it r..olved and the City Cal:Dl>11 finds as folIo....:
1. %hat: said a.l:t:tcm. of the PlalUdng CalDmisslon.. together nth.
sdd fiwlings J:eCOllllileDding the granting of said 'CaDditional
Use Peraie. subjec.t. to the ~ad1.t.iQDS se.t: fartb. there.1.o.. eo
st _ Rose of Lam Churcb fo::
eons t'ruc1:lon 0./ new' church _ add 'to of .flee .soace
"" the property loc:ated,
293 tiEl" Street'
ami llUlr<l particularly desu1bed in the lllat attached h.eJ:eBo. 1a
hereby aff1rmed. and sstd Ccraditi<>aal Us.. Permit is hereby authorized as re""""",nded
hy the l'lsml1itg Cc:am1ss1cm.
2. The City Clerk shall comply with the lI.....,loi""" of Section 15.56 ..
aub-paragrapb 2 of Ord1ZW1CG!l 110. 398.
14-68
..c.. .-=
,.
FAsSED AMD Al'l'RO'Il'IID bY. the CIIr 'COlIllCIL of ,the Cm 00' CHllLA VISTA, CALU'ol1NiA
tbis Sid
o!ay of
Sept""""'. li6l
"y """ EoUo<dilg
'l't\Ice" tOil_it:
A'LllS .
0lilu=11me", _..f. """Iliat.... _1
NAYES :
Goun.1Im.", -.
ABSENr:
Coune.:pmen McIlIIiDa.; s.1u
" Co)
&old. W. Heaz:el .-
&1or of the CUy of Chula Vista
"
'"
_'t.
\~nn~h ~';!~#
CiI:7 Cl...,
",
.... '
"
STUll: av CALD'OIlIlU )
ClOUIIn' 0Jr SAIl DIBGO )
C1'ft Olr' Cam.A VIS1'A' )
"
x,m.sm P. CAIil'IIIlLL. Cll:7 Clerk'ofo,tIla City ,of Chula Visc:a. caUfornia
DO BEKBBY CEUIrl tbafC the' above and forsgo1ag is a. Eul.!. trWI and. c:oaei::t:
copy of
RAAolueiOn N~.'3188
su4 thef: the' ..- has ....t be...
-_..~ or rcp.aaledo
, "
DA't1m:
September 3. li63
"
d~~~',J4~
ley Clerk
'-
\
'-
"
',-
.,
14-69
"
":""')I:n-~\""O
tpmtQ :)~ltpz:) ~JO:lS01I":IS
uqd""'l'lll"!l'!"'il
i
I
WM
I;
-,
J
1i~(:I i
.~ I! ii !ll~
g I~ ) -I II.~
U~ II: I
I~
o
WM
14-70
-.-.--.....-.--.-------..-...-..--------
~
d nnH .
~ I
~ vI ~ ~ u
- & · I-t
~ .1 , , . , , . ~I I
~ l! ~ ~ 21 i I
i , , &, , t !I I~ .
. ,t- S
. . lil!
~~~~~~~lilll~l! ~
i !!!H g ':Ii~ ; ~
w . l i.1 .
~g i I ~ n !
1
!! ~n n; f
~ I
~ II ~:
1.1 , , , , ~ I
~ ~I i
I , , , , , , !i I
_Ii! s-
!i! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~I!iil:! lil: i
id !HH~II.;I~.
1;l1 ~.Ini~
w !:i ~ I .:1.:1 .. I
~!g d I II ~I u H
__.______.._~__.._ _~___1lI
.rnrn.....TT'I.........Trn I
.
U~
r!
"
" ,
,~"
.
u~
r!
II
II
I.' IIn!1 ,-'.- -.---.--
Ij, !UH!
,....
J !~~ J
Illhli Ii,
IHni Ill!' I
~I I I
CD ~il ~ ~. ~ ~
<I7 ~, '!;; g =
~ ,1' =, ~I
" ~l" ! II ~ ~ ~ ~;i
~ ;1 t ! , !, ~t I
. ;1 i ·
" ~.. ~ n I
I h?i~, , ! 'I I~ ·
"; !i~, k~ l~'llIII~ itlll;- i
w .1 S 11 .
~ i I~ n !
! I · ~ ~ · ~ ~
~ nnn
, f
!u;~ . U
l;1 , . ~ , , ,~t I
~i I ·
~l! ~~ ~ h I
~ ,&:l<, , ~ ,i I~ ·
'I t~ s
; ! an ;lillIH lllil; i
: . Ii.) .
~gii ISU !
.i
~
..
.
~
~
E9
~l
~
.
~
~
.
.-<
.-<
...
<l
'"
]
"
oj
...
...
..:
'"
'"
"
'"
"
oj
'"
.-i
'"
-
tIl
~
.-i
'"
H
H
H
'"
tIl
'oj
.d
'"
""
<l
oj
OIl
.;1
...
"
..-<
>l
'"
k
o
I><
1lmD~'
E'lGINEERING COMPANY
<
ll-anspOTtclCUm Di1JiSion
March14,2007
~.JeffSteichen
City of Chula Vista
Planning and Building Departmenr
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista; CA 91910
SUBJECT: 'ADDENDUM TO TIIE FINAL SAINT ROSE OF LIMA PARISH MASTER
PLAN TRAFFIC STUDY DATED JANUARY 30,2007
(JOB NUMBER 14615-C)
Dear Mr. Steichen:
Pursuant to your request, a parking occupancy count was recently conducted at the Chula Vista
Gateway site (northwest comer of Third Avenue and H Street) to deterniine the parking
availability at this site on a typical Sunday. This is one of the proposed Sunday off-site parking
locations identified for the Saint Rose of Lima Parish Master Plan. The information provided in
this letter will serve as an addendum to the Final Saint Rose of Lima Parish Master Plan Traffic
Study prepared by Rick Engineering Company, dated January 30, 2007.
SUNDAY CHULA VISTA GATEWAY PARKING OCCUPANCY COUNT
Parking occupancy counts were conducted by Turning Point Traffic Service at the existing Chula
Vista Gateway site on Sunday, February, 25, 2007. These counts were record,ed at 3D-minute
intervals from 7:00 AM to 6:00 PM. The site currently has a five level parking structure
consisting of 761 spaces and a 58 space surface parking lot (819 parking spaces total).
App endi::x: A contains the parking supply and occupancy record sheets.
Table 1 shows a summary of these Sunday parking occupancy counts. These counts ,show that
the total parking at this location peaked at 10:00 AM with a parking occupancy of 8.8% (72
vehicles parked, with 747 empty parking spaces). These low percentages are due primarily to
the limited weekend business hours of the Chula Vista Gateway tenants. Parking occupancy
averaged about 7% between the hours of 8:00 AM to 2:00 PM (hours that fall within the typical
Saint Rose of Lima Parish Sunday Mass times). This relates to about 58 vehicles parked, with
761 empty parking spaces. According to the Final'Saint Rose of Lima Parish MaSter Plan
Traffic StUdy, 379 off-site parking spaces are needed to acco=odate the Sunday peak parking
demand (544 parking space demand minus 165 on-site parking proposed = 379 off-site parking
spaces). Therefore, the Chula'Vista Gateway site caD. acco=odate these 379 spaces during the
Sunday peak period (761 > 379).
14-71
ATTACHMENT 5
5(l20Fri,tr:>Ro,lCl _ S.lnOi("~n.C,lIirnrlli.1"~II(}-~:;q(,. !1,lql~l1rl}-I)-' F..\X"lr,I'III<)f...llr.:;. r;..l.....'jn'."..i",..<tHI1
Mr. Jeff Steichen
. March 14, 2007
Page 2
However, these current parking occupancy counts assume Chula Vista Gateway to be partially
leased put. Therefore, in conservatively assuming that doubling the peak parking occupancy
(8.8% x 2 = 18%) to represent a fully leased out Chula Vista Gateway project, this would relate
to 148 vehicle parked with 677 empty parking spaces on a typical Sunday. Even with this
conservative assumption, the Chula Vista Gateway site can acconnodate the 379 off-site spaces" "
during the Sunday peak period (677) 379).
,
,
. CONCLUSIONS
Based on the Sunday parking occupancy count conducted, ample off-site Sunday parkiD.g for the
Saint Rose of Lima Master Plan can be provided at the Chula Vista Gateway site. As mentioned
in the Final Saint Rose of Lima Parish Master Plan Traffic Study, at least 544 parking spaces
(on-and off-site combined) would need to be provided to acconnodate Sunday peak parking
demands. With a minimum of 165 on-site parking spaces proposed, an additional 379 off-site
parking spaces would be needed. Saint Rose of Lima Parish proposes to utilize the following
off-site locations to help meet the peak Sunday parking demand:
Off site oarking location
Alvarado Street
Sharp-Rees Steely Clinic
Chula Vista Gateway Site
Available oarkIDg spaces
70
76
819
TOTAL: 965
Appropriate parking agreements have been obtained to utilize both Sharp-Rees Steely Clinic and
Chula Vista Gateway off-site parking locations. "
Should you have any questions, please contact me at (619) 291-0707.
G COMPANY
Attachments
cc: Mr. Dave Kaplan - City"ofChula Vista
Mr. Deacon Greg Smyth, Suint Rose of Lima Parish
14-72
"'l
..J
'"
1:1
~
'"
:;:
;-. ::>
-< '"
?; H
'" Z
~ 5
Cl~(J
1:1Atl
~~~
;'-"',,-,
::i e
;:> (J
= '0
(J Cl
Z
sa
ex:
-<
0..
.........0........ ...".. ...... ......,",.,....._.....J....J....3......J:........ ........f........ ........ ..._...,.......~.._._l.............._~....._t.......~......~.......f.............~."~.~...,,
.~_:.......::::: ..:.....:..::.. . :::...._.. ..-...._.-..: ......-.-.-:::T.;.:':.-..::.':.l...-::..:....:t..-::........t"........-::.:;{.:.-::......~..f_-::....:.-... .::.........-.f:::::.-:;:. :::...-:..... ....:.-...........":...-:.....;f::...~:..... ................,~.::::::.....~.::..::.-:t.::::..:.......~.:..:....)t....:.......:t':..::.:......::_.:.-:::....~~~.:.......
I
~I~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ * ~ ~ * ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ s ~ s
"
~
..J
OJ
>
OJ
..J
e
::I >.
;:; 8:
2 ~
en ~~
'" c ~
~ ~
~ "-
a.
~
o
a.
~
8
o
I
I I
01010/010/0101010 OIOJOIOIOfOIO 0101010/01010
.:::-:::~. ':-:-~:':~~III:':':':-:::':"" "'::-~~~-:-:'~':1"):'~!7: :.:.:.:-:~-: :.;.:.:.:-:-:: ::-:.~.:.::. :.:-:.:.::.:-: ::.:."*:-:.:-:-:-::-:.:i::t.:.~-...:.:::.:- ..... .
::.:~:. .::.......:.. ................. .................... ".-::.-:.-:. .-:...-:.-.~ ...~....-: ..:......~..~ .......~........ ......::...... ...~~......:.. ..:...-:....: .......:......
: fl~ ':i<.:,:i::: ."..m'''. "iO" ~..........m ~;.;;:;. ;...m. :;;.::;i: i~i r;''' ...... ~~;; ;~~ i.~i;; ;;(~:;~ :;~;~~ ;~;;; ...m.. ........ ..n. . ... ........ ........
BII *, :=ilif4l:i~~.~ =0 :.;1&.
.... ......... ..m ......... .n..' ....,...,....t.......J...~......l...,...,..m.,.,..~l.........l.......,.....,."...... ..,...........t................."..............,.......... ....... .....m m.... ..,...,...l...,..l.~.~. ,............
: I!!
~I~ ~ ~I~I~'~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I ~ ~ ~ ~INI~ ~I~ ~ ~
~:i!!~f .t~~~ .m. ~7'. ~~ff~f.:~~'f.:
:~:~~TI:~::~~: :
~; .=
~:~:~~t~~:~~~ ~~::~
':':-::-:':':':'I':'X':':~';' .;.x.:.7{.:.. ...
I
~
m
'"
m
0.
M
..J
"'
[;j
..J
~
o .
~ >. 0..
_ a. :::J
o 0. 8
.5::;J 0
en ~~ ~
'" c ~
c :g
t! <<l
m "-
"-
~
NIN
'"
NI~I~I~
:@:~,,:
~I~
N
N
N
!~~:.::.:.:.:.
.:.~.]il .
'~:~~~~~1~' ~
~
..J
ILl
>
lU
..J
e
.3 >.
u 8:
2 ~
en :~
co c ~
c :g
~ cu
m "-
..
~
m
a.
"
S
o
'"
~
'"
"$. ~
N 1;
m
U.
"
;!:
"
'"
~
"
~
'"
"
OJ
"
~
'"
t\l
"
~
"
~
N
'"
'"
'"
'"
~
'"
"
~
'"
m
'"
'"
~
'"
"
~
"
~
'"
....
"
;'!
"
0;
"
~
"
~
"
'"
"
~
is
~ -- · .1 '" ' , , " , '" ' + ' , --I_:J:d
--------~ --'--rT-.~,.1I1TTrTfr'~- .TT-'---.., "
",.., ___I_~J-____--lIJ~___L.-J..-_.__ .
.....-.......-...-.-. ~ ...... -~... -~...)..;.. ...;.. ...;. ;......;.. i' "i" 'i" "~"I n~.... .~....~... "~'T~ ;.. n~'I"~"I'" ~"I ~ 1 ~ I ~ ~
~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 g g g g g goo 0[0 0 0 0 0 oolgJoO ..
L- 0 '", 0 '" 0 C') .. .. .. .. .. -. 0 '" 0 '" 0 ('J I 0 I ~ .. I .. , .. (D
r- r--: r-: 1.0 oi:i I CD 1 CD 0 TJ ~ ~ ~ ..- .... N ~ N .n ~ .q: .q.! 10 ! lQ ; to ~
~
.
~
~
0.
=
C
o
~
~
APPENDIX A
~hula Vista Gateway Parking
Supply/Occupancy Record Sheet
. 1 4-74
\3'J... (9V.>fJs L€1J'iLS:
, ;)..c,." /0 /,;L
.5 18
S r fti3
n :{'"
:s IS" It'-
I 112 {.
6:0eL~
- lot
, \..:
(Jt
rrVS.i~6 Le.veL-
'~ f ;)'J-.
5 }1'1: : JJ t :1; ; 'f-\(t
It--/- I
( ,...
: Orw 'oi
8-3 -<6 t _ \ /'d ~
~f)0lfr$iJ'L GPDO~ rLobtZ,
~ -
----:>
-vt-
-BI~ ToTAL
'0/l-H'i.. wll.,,\
r
~ I i I
~ -><\{1:\
'" r I 1
'>
,- I
!{ i
=4
f
I I 1
i r ~
t L ,
'(
I
f
\1}-.
1
~iO-:- .
kA~\ l,~ 9\1'--t.i:.-(
(;hvLJ::i. 0~0"1-l bArS04j ,
"P-A e. K... r,0 '}-
6J-,. - J---S'" - D 7
.r 10 s i cR.e. L e. lJ e L 3
. ~, I J--3
5' (t Jt[ g 'rftl'l 3 lff 11'
S" <.Jj Cj 6 'f'3 '-f \V
r
1'1
h.
<>I
,~
~
Is, g
18
9--..
3
5" Ilrl'1 gfl jJ 4-Lfl j
~ l..y '1 e..y rL{-, j-J, \!J t
~1
~
V)
/5
g-
( 7
LE.\J12'L i
f (~
I ./
,/
.s j t q g 4. 3' '-l ~! J'~ ~
5 "''1''61/ --l'6Lf ~J
"11
~
,B'
~
~
~
r::'
4-75
;?
~
'r-
Q/,
~4
------
.."
TABLE A
CHULA VISTA GA TEW A Y
SUNDAY PARKING STRUCTURE DCCUP Ai'lCY -COUNT SUMJ\;IARY
LEVEL 1
"':"'''''.~ .,.;:%($......,..
:~S~-t~9$:~...t..;;;}~~
:~~>;; :. >.~(~
LEVEL 3
TIME
Parking Supply:
parked
4:3.0 PM
5:00 PM
5:30 PM
6:00 PM
.......$.
.,..-.,-
" .,'
Note: Parking occupancy counts conducted. an Sunday, February 25, 2007.
14-76
LEVEL 5
Parking Supply:
()
a
6
o
6
o
<l
o
O.
0.
CJ
fJ
o
a
o
<J
6
D
()
o
o
parked
~
o
'.{1t. ::
.~",..'~
..,.....'
." ~..)...:v.:rv....:.~'
t._ :Xi~n;f.t':.;.... ;.:':l..';
;~;E'l~~.~:t". :,-..:::
:....t.7:.;.~;..; .,.....:....,;~;j.~
. ;.:.t:.<< ;2:'b,":' ,I
~.,~fJ:"l~~ ~- .~: !}.....:.-r
. }:\;rtj:~.j;~:~:~; ,f;t.~
.':<t: ..:.';1;.'C....;"W~
" ,~1..~!t_i''''...... .' :.._~~":t;
1 .' (1JzH'...... ..,.':
f:? '}./J:;[. .;:;., '~i""
i..,,~~'Wt~~\'~
'J~W~-:f ,~ ~
:.~~r ::.r.:.~\~..~
".:;.: L. . .~ ._._~'<>
..~ : ...;~.'.~im
~:~~$<\:~f.1
. "-H ",' ","
.' '.<."1-"'1 . ..",.
, !:.~.;;~oc:... . .,';:'"
:......;Jr.......,:...: ,''\:
.. "...r.~." :.
: ~;.:;;~2. ....:..: .~.~.
...::.'4"d'.''''3:....,~. ....,
'$.:~.. ,. . . ..~ .
: i~~~:;::.. :. -. '....:::-
"""~"";'-.. :..,
:....::" '.:::1 .' ~
.' . .' .
PROPOSED PRECISE PLAN STANDARDS
Minimum Building Setbacks: Third Avenue: o feet
Alvarado Street: o feet
H Street: o feet
Building Height: 54 feet (top of roof)
90 feet (top of spire)
Fence Height: 8 feet height (along interior/eastern)
DroDertv line
Parking: 261 of required parking spaces allowed off-
site. Shared parking will be allowed in
conjunction the following: 1) parking study
showing excess parking available from
Donor during time of applicants need for
such spaces 2) copy of agreement between
Donor and Recipient.
Off-site Pedestrian Access: Modification of Section 19.62.040 of
CVMC to reqUIre only a two party
agreement between applicant and City
required ensuring that off-site parking
SDaces will be Drovided.
ATTACHMENT 6
14-77
4:52:59 PM
5:14:40 PM
4:54:31 PM
Design Review Committee
Minutes
5
Mav 7, 2007
3. DRC-06-S0
St. .Rose of Lima Catholic Parish of the Diocese of
San Diego
The proj~ct is located at 293 H Street.
Desion Review for the phased renovation and expansion of
the existinG St. Rose of Lima Catholic Church and Parochial
School.
Project Manager: Jeff Steichen, Associate Planner
Chair Alberdi recused himself for this item and stated Mr. Bringas would be leading this part
of the meeting.
Staff Presentation:
Mr. Jeff Steichen, Associate Planner, presented the project details to the committee. He
stated that the project is located at 293 H Street and proposes a phased ,renovation and
expansion of the existing St. Rose of Lima Catholic Church and Parochial School. He
.. ..added that as far as the parking is concerned, because the project is based upon the
Urban Core Specitk Plan, the residential areas were taken out. Therefore, this project will
be processed based upon the Municipal Code standards and as a result, a total of 429
parking spaces will be required at Phase 3 build out. The applicant is proposing 169
onsite parking spaces arid is in the process of obtaining a formal agreement with the
Gateway Center across the westslde of Third Avenue to utilize their large parking structure
to accommodate the 260 required offsite parking spaces.
Aoolicant Presentation:
Father John Dolan, pastor of St. Rose of Lima parish, introduced himself, project manager
Deacon. Greg Smyth and their architect, David pfeifer with Dominy and Associates.
Deacon Smyth stated they are here to seek approval of a master plan for their conditional
use permit, which involves phased replacement of their facilities. Mr. Pfeifer presented a
powerPoint presentation to the committee.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
That the Design Review Committee approve of the project subject to the conditions stated
in the draft Notice of Decision.
Public Comments:
None
14-78
ATTACHMENT 7
5:16:02 PM
Design Review Committee
Minutes
6
Mav 7.2007
COMMITTEE DISCUSSION:
During discussions, the following were noted as Committee comments/major concerns:
. How was it determined where the arcade was going to be. It doesn't seem
consistent as to where the windows are squared and where there is an arcade.
o Mr. Pfeifer stated they did not want it to look like one huge building. They
wanted to retain the sense of It being a campus of smaller buildings. They
felt if they did a continuous arcade all the way around the building, it would
have made it feel too massive.
. Would like to see a circular element of a window on the fa~ade that faces the play.'
area on the northern portion of the school site.
o Mr. Pfeifer said that was very doable.
. It looks like the arcade between the school and parish hall along Third Avenue will
be open to the street. Is the intention to have fencing or' something closing off the
arches so pedestrians do not go through there.
o Mr. Pfeifer stated there are 12-foot tall arches in the center elevation and
the lower 6-feet of them will be solid wall. There will be security grills or
ornamental iron above that.
. Since there is no elevation or rendering with the tower on the opposite side, other
than blocking the entry courtyard, are there any other implications that will have.
o Deacon Smyth said the diocesan iiturgical committee generally likes to see
a gathering area outside the front door in churches. With the tower in the
original position, it impinged upon the gathering area. By moving it over, it
made the gathering area larger. He aiso stated the City asked them to put
a right turn lane on H Street, which caused them to have to cheat the
building 5 to a-feet north. The fact that the tower was moved over gave
them the luxury of doing that without hurting the gathering area. .
. In looking at the corners on Third Avenue, H Street and Alvarado, they feel like the
back of the church and wondered if there was a way to make them feel more like
a corner point of view than what it is right now.
o Mr. Pfeifer stated that the church is 5-years down the road. What they are
looking for at this time is the approval of the master plan of phases 1 and
2. When the church is designed, it would come back to the Design Review
Board and they would have really studied those issues. Deacon Smyth
added that Community Development stipulated that they had to have a
door there and there is an entry now incorporated in the floor plan of the
church. It is a work in progress and completion is contingent upon
fund raising.
. Are there any materials, colors or textures that could be used as accent points to
the Gateway Center without trying to be a mirror image in character, but being
complimentary to it.
o Father Dolan said from. the .onset, they_wanted to make sure it would
compliment the Gateway Center. He felt they could include some of the
elements on their project.
Mr. Steichen clarified that tonight, the committee would be approving the master plan and
the architectural design of phases 1 and 2. They have added into the conditions of
approval, item #10, that states prior to construction of phase 3, applicant shall return to
14-79
Design Review Committee
Minutes
7
Mav 7,2007
the Design Review Committee for review and approval of the church sanctuary. Design
approval should be based upon conceptual plans for the church approved today. In
addition, the design shall incorporate the existing architectural mission theme and this
would be the appropriate spot if the committee wanted to add any additional language
regarding the church, .
11 :34 PM
. MSC (BringasjHogan) (3-0-1-0) Approve DRC-06-S0 project as presented with
the condition on item #10 to incorporate accent colors and materials that
would be complimentary to the Gateway Plaza, which can be reviewed in the
future; and adding the rosette onto the phase 1 building which faces the play..
area. .
l2:55 PM
Chair Alberdi rejoined the meeting at this time.
14-80
>
~ (ft...
-.-
, ---
P I ann
ng & Building Department
Planning Division I Development Processing
CITY OF
CHUlA VISTA
APPLICATION APPENDIX 8
Disclosure Statement
Pursuant to Council Policy 101-01, prior to any action upon matters that wiii require discretionary action by the Council,
Planning Commission and all other official bodies of the City, a statement of disclosure of certain ownership or financial
Interests, payments, or campaign contributions for a City of Chula Vista election must be filed. The following information
must be disclosed:
1. Us! the names of all persons having a financial Interest in the property that Is the subject of the application or the
contract, e.g" owner, applicant. contractor, subcontractor. material supplier.
OWNER: THE ROMAN CATHOLIC.BISHOP OF SAN DIEGO, A SOLE CORPORATION
DBA ST. ROSE OF LIMA CATHOLIC BAlUSH, 293 H STREET, CB1JLA VISTA, CA. 919io
2. If any person' identiffed pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of ail individuals wtth
a $2000 investment in the business (corporation/partnership) entity.
N!A
3. If any person' identified pursuant to (1) above is a non-profit organization or trus~ list the names of any person
serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or. beneficiary or trustor of the trust.
TIlE ROMAN CATHOLIC BISHOP OF SAN.DIEGO, A SOLE CORPORATION
DllA ST. ROSE OF LIMA CATHOLIC PARISH.
FATHER JOHN DOLAN
4. Please identify'every person. inclUding any agents, employees. consultants, or independent contractors you have
assigned to rep~sent you before the City in this matter.
FATHER JOHN .DOLAN
DEACON GREG SMYTH
MR., :gAym. PFEIFE;R, AIA
MR. A. LEmS"'DOMINY; AIA
5. Has any person' associated with this contract had any financial dealings with an official:* of the City of Chula
Vista as it relates to this contract within the past 12 months, Yes_ No-L
If Yes, briefly describe the nature of the financial interest the ofiicial- may have in this contract
6. Have you made a contribution of more than $250 within the past twelve (12) months to a current member of the
ChuiaVista City Councii? No ~ Yes~lfyes, which Council member? . . .
14-81
ATTACHMENT 8
l.
~\f?.
---Jr-
, -
plannin"
'"
& Building
Planning Division
Department
OeveJopment Processing
mY OF
CHULA VISTA
APPLICATION APPENDIX B
Disclosure Statement - Page 2
7.' Have you provided more than $340 (or an item of equivaient value) to an official" of the City of Chuia Vista in the'
past twelve (12) months? (This includes being a source of income, money to retire a iegal debt, gift, loan, etc.)
Yes No-.L
If Yes, which officiili** and what was the nature of item provided?
Date: 09 SEPTEMBER 2006
REV. JOHN P. DOLAN, PASTOR
type name of Contractor/Appncant
Print or
.
Person is d"fined as: any individual, firm,' co-partnership, joint venture; association, social clu~, fratemal
organization, Porporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, any other county, city, municipality, district, or other
pontical su6division, "or any other group or C9mbinatioh acting as a unit
..
Official includes, but is not Iimfted to: Mayor, Council member, Planning Commissioner; Member of a board,
commission, or committee of the City, employee, or stalfmembers.
.'
17~~_-.f..q~[.h..0:!enue
Chula Vi'!~1~~;ji~o~niU_919~.__.L.'619) 691.5101
..---..-----'------
........."-"..=-
~
- j. -
-:-i7---~--.-=~r- --=--====~ -.------.-.--.--
~mH . ~=-'-=';~~ :-',-. .-t='.j=-
~~ ~~ -- ~"'-_. ~~~ i
:~g ~
J!IpfHllrW
;-.------ --.-------'-
i
i
i
i
i
.~..-
"
"
f 1'1'1
1.1
w ,. !
ill'
" ,.
'1'
" H
1 lh
",
.31
W
<B
ilii! i! ! ,I!!!!!! i !
lhu Iii I iil!li! ~ I
11m Ii,' II
:l I II I
-. I
II I I !
I . Ii
'i' i' P i ~ I 'I
'II i'P! ~,
!il'l ! I ~ r
! I I II ~: I
I I d
I > ,
tI ;; Jil :;a l
~ ! ! E ~ :
.. ~." .. i
.
lorn:
3.9 9O.iL N
II!
,!;
'n
!f
oj
E-
li.
I"
l";
~ t ::
j';';,
~ ;; I
-.
% l! .. Ii
PI!! : Idnl
11I1I~ !filh
II . q It'
I.IJ.I, ~ . I
Hilla I
..!.:.... .. m, m
, . .... ~
!
i
!I: i
-, ~ .Ii i
~ . Ii!
, ,~i I
~d I'!
a ! I
I-I i
~l ,
I'
"
[
"
I,
'ii
'1 '
I, I
I '
, I
I '
, I
I ,
" i I
.. E" ~... 'V
!!!I!!jil!!i!!'il~
illllli'illl!II!I~
i i II ',Ill !l ! I >
. I! I II ·
J ~ r f
; I , ,,", 'I '
II .. ...
, ! I
! I
i
!i
,
I.
. ;.
~ ~ ..
Z
a
>
.
~ ~ ~
I ill1lliili
I r ! I I i I ~
I j! I I ~
I. a
. I n
. I ~ ~ ~ t: :: ; -~ 5!
c ; ;5a1N 5 rn
:: ~ t r::::: r: :: :: ~
" .. " lO)
f f I ~
. . .
"
;;HnHEHt~
"
IIIWlllm~
Ii!!! uill
lid I
&'1"~
ill,
ill
, !
~1\~
l2l1i*
t!'~~
~-_.__.
o t..i5'....
" ~
Jc-
..-...;pop.... \
Ll)l \
.c....--1 I
'jlll ml!!
II 'u III
I ',I
..... '!;I,
Hm ~
111111 L-
i Proposed Master Plan
I
,
St. Rose of [jmll Catholic Church
O""'Vn...CoIi_
14-83
.
~--_._-
--- ----.
i
T
~~!!:!I.'W
0; ).!I
.~
_0=".
, T~Q AVEN~
~ ~ - _"!'
~~S&- __
T
r
PAROCHIAL SCHOOL
-- ""---
_..._~_.....-
I--
PAROCHIAL
SCHOOL
.
:~~ LJS"p~ISH HALL ~h
..... -- ..-- I
~ 1
....... ....-.....- -
"ll_~EQUIIG
._~
~ I?-:
'0 : \"E- rJ!:
;!~~y"'\-...~~ '
/:~ ~~
{ov J: LJ ~ . l
AR ., -,
t;j -~i''''" .--Y'
~t.;'. ~- - ~.;'
?=~:~..:.::<.:t:.
I p~t:*4J
c-~. I~ ~ .~~~. ~ d;" 1 1
- I-\-- --e - ..
~ !-' - "
L ===;- :'I---:"n PASTORAL CENTE
C:':..RCH j Ii: ..... , ~I :.o,r,::1..'io- =- -
~.. ._~ .fl..' .:. !~~U~d - .~
S~I ~- ~~ ~~, ~~";~~~~'.~~
t ~::( _::.-- ~~ 1/:d':1 )Yj' l' A-I [~":'~=';"-"",,, '.'. ~;-r:'d
j.-....:./.I;;,. I \ /"" _ & .L,~_~.__ ..."'" . 1 "'T:....
.
)' e-'---
I, Ilw..,- ~
" - -!; ., ';'"" fli0",
I '!::I:" :1. : 'I i Q;:('::::):~ :
, 1-' <(!I OJ'l' J$.':.......:............"'(~H'j........................ .... f-
I[:~ ~ i1 .' :::::::,.,:.:::::!::.. :" ~
-""y, <( !. . ..... .........:;ii"S: . to
,~~,:. ;. ';Z', ~r~I~;III,i~;!l
-''::' I
~ I
11;..c
1,:1.
~
eo \1
IE
!~~.
I
"l
I I~
1"7 I
l
.""."'....'La~HsJ
9NI(]lms
l
.' L.,
'~~;':1~o::) ~3aNn ~QlmB
["" G:JJillS '\WlS-QMJ.
c!
9NlOllfleO:J:JIl.LS
,,~OlS-OM.L
.
oj I
1[1 i
III i
i~i
-
"
l'
'~
L-
,
G
II lir I HlI!1'
. '.'" 'I:
~_ ______ :,mJ ____---+-_
e. ~if~~ : Existing Master Plan
~
St. Rose of Lima Catholic Church
""...v;,...<:.o....
14-84
0_......_.'_ -..-___~_.._....._____
I'
-------_..-.._.._----.......-......_-.-..._.._-~.....'--.-...
1".'-
"
.
"
"
m
~
~
c8
"tI
':r
III
l/I
CD
I\.)
THIRD AVENUE
8
11---
r--' -~
, '
, '
, '
~G:
rJ :
L, :
L__~
THIRD AVENUE
"
~
"
m
~
J--c---r~ ')
,---,
, ,
rt._____.J :
\ ,
I G I
{ ~
------, :
L_....-"
"tI
':r
III
l/I
CD
W
THIRO AVENue
-;;.r:~.-
,I
"'
i
o
.
"
"
:;$
"
.
"
"
m
m
"
11)1,
h
1;-~o,.--
I I
Ii
- .~_,,' I
-;'" ___ _ _ . _n ._n____l
,,:;
~
eel"
. c :J;
eo>
if a en
i- 1: m
~ ~ N
, 0
n
, -
" .
~ ~
cnm
;:;:><
CD iii'
::!:
::::I
(Q
.
.
.[
I
i
I
THIRD AVENUE
Z'
~~Il
",'~,:, ~
__ ____J11
_ m
"
i
o
.
"
"
:;Hl
"
"
.
"
"
m
~
~
cJ
Ii!
~
~
8eel"
li ~ li :::I:
3 i!t S ~
~ Z if m
::r ~ ::r (.01
~ ~ ~
;; n ~
. , .
~ ~
~ .j"
"tI
':r
III
l/I
CD
.....
~,'&~[t
~1~
>.11.
~ ~!;~
mnJ,'
'u f!
hf
..... 1[','
!fHf
mIIL~__.__.__--_.--~-~~_.---~.-~-,-~-
"Ill i
I'
I
. Phasing Pbn
14-85
-0-
-----r~.
. .
. .
. ,
. ,
"'..."
" m , c .
0 x " m c
" . > . 5
m " . ~
~ Z m Z
0 . 0
z . " d
m
c c
F .
c Z m
Z m
0 ~
"
[ill}
!I i
c
o
.
"
"
:;~
"
f-
iii
I
-1
~ I"~
I ~.
,
m
X
'"
-<
z
"
<Il
::;
m
"
....
>
Z
~
~
~~I:l!
~l~
f ; ~
,
~ ~
~ ~
ii: C;;
~ ~
d
. e
i is:
" l
ED] I....
'-:-" m
,<~ C)
'<", m
Z
o
, . ,
C ~ ~
z c ,
~ z g
5 ~ t9
z ~
~ ~
"
m
"
St. Rose of Lima Catholic Church
n....vb...c"".....
'71 f;"-i"fi1nT1 rrw-----
. ., ~ ~ m
p fl q.___.~
~ ii ~$!!~!'; 12
e 8,. , I'" =; ~ t:: ::: ~::: G)
I j - al.
~ I ~i!"'" II
i I~! , I:
h " , 'ii! j
~ ~ "I.
~6 , i' ~
I i.". _ ." I 0
! ,e '" - ~, ~ iii !!!
it:: t:: t:: t::::;at:: a
, ,
i ! ~
: II Hili Ii P j ~
: I I" ~ ~! I :
~~ '!~~m~;!.
'I l:: '" .. i'T:: '" .... i
j" 61'.!'" '":
s ~~ ~:! I 'I
~ ~ i !" Ii ' 'Ii' II
! I!! I' , :,'
i ~ II . '!
~ "i:' ,~ ' , ~ ' 'Ii! '"
~i Ii , iil i
ii, "
i.Si;~~ila
I!: t:: t:: ::: ::: ::: ~ ~ ~
i : ~ ~
~ li~il' 'j
t i !. d II
. F I ~ ~
~ ,! I~ "," ',-Ii n, 81'
~ 11,"1' . . , .. -,
j ~_ I., i
: ~i !i i,! ' '~I~ ,i II'
i I I ~ I' .",
I ~ I' , .
i ~;I!"ii";il~
~ Ii' "I'l i
i Iii ~ ; . i ;, ili
::: ::: ::: t: ::: :::' ~ ~
, ' I~
! il! litH I PI I~
. If ~ ~ 'i:
~ ,! Ii :"Ii 'IHI i.,,'
~ Ii' .' " ' -!
. ~- - 1'&, !
, .~ ~- '
I" Ie 1',1' """'.. I'
, · ~', .. "'! i I
i I ill n',~
i ;p , r Hirl~
ia i '
'IH' ~ Hi !Ii
,!::::: ::::::::: , I a
,'>
!~
Ii '! !irI !ll1!1
_._~__.__.,_.__~__._..tjUUL !l
o ;j;.'J?'
~L;;
---_..~-....-..--_.._------_._-.-..._...._~_._-.-...
Bm
~
~J
.n
!
I
~
CT'
U..1
!~
G
II
ji
i
Bm
~
I
~
.J
.u
!
CT'
L":'"
!~
G
Ii
ii
i
--_._----~-----,-_.~~-_..-~'------_._--- _.__._--~
St. Rose of Lim:l Gtholk Church
E:dsting Master Plan
<JwloV.....c.........
14-86
11I_"._."_
-------_..--_.._--_..._-_._-.-...._...._-_._-.-~.
i'3
c
z
o
~
~
o
~
m
o
o
OJ
?2
o
C'
~
~
_1__
~
rrl}l
,U Ill:
h!1
am It!
__.!~IIIL___ T--~-.------
i'JIII
II
'I
----- _. -.- --~-
S~~R~~e -of Lima Catholic Church
.,.......-.....C.oll<o.....
14-87
..-....-.,,- ",..-...__.._--~---
'"
.
o
~
U>
s:
.
Q.
"
~
c
o
~
"
<'
~
.
~
~
a
c
~
~
U>
1;'
w
a
C1 ..
~
c .
0 ,
c
~ .
" .
0 ,
a ~
~ :I:
. sa
0
. ;;;
~ ..
.
:I: "
"' ~
:i
..
"""I"
I.,;"',',
".,'"
~L,
~-L--
o ,~"
~~
ljll f 1Hfi!1
If '''1111
I hi,
..... -;'
!lut t'
IUlII I
ISitePhotogrnphics
,
------.-.-..---..--------.----.....-..----.--..-...
sa
il"
..
il"
~
Q
"
~
~ Cir"'\"';:'
I] \c.c', t~1
, "';<~"'I . ...... J.
"----- -"{>; ,~ ',t.:; :-1
',I, "!"---:;;;PJ" "~C;r'
,',-rY-'lil,-,;:..c~.', ,
,.- -.0:. ;-/
r:-=r:-'~l ", ~ --"
'-;., ~I~
r~-;:",~"",,"
i'"Vl~lf<"~,/" :
"V ~,
C- >
11 '
I',.
14-88
St. Rose of Lim~ Dtholic Chureh
r.....v....<;oIjr-
e___;-".._ -.._..._~_.._~-'-!'-_._--
I
---_......-_..-.._.._--_..._-_._-.-...-~.._~_._-.-...
-<
1\:1,',
. "!
,
, "
I~!
I
~~
y--
~ r.~~
!;'~:.;
;l'
i
~
E
~
o
~
o
~,
~ I
~,
~I
~
'if!
~i
In .cL- -C- ---e..........c... ....
, ~
~
~
~
~
P~H~ ~..
i !! ~
~ . 0 ~
i ~ _C '
"
~ ,
tn ~_~:
- !
llll
I i
I I
i
H:
l
I i II
i i
!
)
~ . c
" .
" .
'1'-
, -j
Ii!
i
. .
Hi
-~
. .
-~
JiUI mm:
lj 'Il!!l'
'I
WH
.-.J.!!III
I ~-f-~P ~--:~-~1
,II rT I
_ .LJ.--L-- -----j--,-,,-if
. -
II
~
~
~
~
2:
------r------..----.-- - -~--..-.-.-"
----IT---
oh-b
~ B
~;
~ T
did
.1 Ii ..
_____ll1L____
I 'I!! I
s I ~
" I "
,
)
,;,
~-- -r-
~
!~
i
I,
, ,
i
_.1. ..L...
I
11
~
"
)
;
,;,
---c::r-t::r-"'C-
,I
-j
I
)
. -,P
"I
-, --c--'-' b
I ",
'.
.
. (
~ -.-
~ B
-I::~L
.
I
- -!
';I-'-'"oj --.- "I .._. 'jju.
"1---,------.: r lJ,
wi'"
~
I
i'
+-
d
,
ii
"
n
-
i
I
.-k---- --..-.-. 11
II." -
,i
.1
"
'I
;...-
I'
,I
II
)
/
. ,1
!
.
,
...!
:1
\
,.
,
,
!
I
'----;"~,.'1:..:-~'
-, - --'--1-"'-
-----_._----_._._----_._._.".._------~_..
St. Rose of Lin1a Catholic Church
! Proposed Parochial School and Parish Hall Floor Plans
<;Io.o~"n".<:.lI\o'"
14-89
________..___M____..________._..._M__~____._...
._....._.,_ _.._..._ft_.._.____.__
,
,
o
,
o
o
m
o
o
.
.
o
,
~
J'14.5'::"-
~
z
b
err.
: '-=-::;=='
n___n...
I
.uu.!
.
!
,
n_n__'____
~
t,
_. ___----.................____"-.~__.__.~'~~u------
,2::
'2::
2::
2::
2::
2::
2::
/
,
)
'I
--L-
[Dl
,
,
o
~
o
m
o
,
g
." ",
1~114.5::
--- ,_- -- - -- -..:0.$",_
,.'
~'
UI~--'~~=~
~ ) 1)
~ I
2::
I
'\'
l:
.
Gl
~i~ 'Iii I' f Ii! H1
~~~ ,,'Ill!!'
_J~___,__Jtill.L_ !l:
:: ;:;:::\J~ : Proposed Ch\,lt'<:;h Floor Plan
ih:;::;,
In
. .
. ..
St. Rose of LJmn Cntholic: Churc:h
<:hooIov....,<'.......
14-90
Il____."_ -..-...--..-.---......-
~
~
m
"
~
8
o
z
~~,
") \
) I
~I.II"I
':'.
~i~
~f~'
~~ii
~-.
b ~~[;
Jin f IHHl
II ,llffl
I h!
'I
WH
111111
14-91
'''',
--.....-----..---..-----.......--.--.---..--..-.--..-...
!~ I
,~ i
'rrl ~
,~
~
o
z
'"
J
I"
I
I
-, ;1\
Ii
l'!II..lI':I
J.
,
,
"
Proposed Building Elevations
z
o
~
~
~
>
:;
o
z
I
I
- ---<
'I
I
I
~,
L=__, ,
.....,.
liIGlGlEl138GEl88
'I' II liHiH ,'I ~
~ . ! ~; ~ -1- ~ f rrl
· i Ii';: ;!1 ~. '"
Ii oil! ! Il i ~
'j' . i' "
ill I ,i ~
!o Ii! 6
ei i ~ J z
Id ! g
Ii ~ i ~
~ ~ i
i .
! ~
~
St. Rose of Lima Catholic Church
,)oWov~,..r...r"...
ID_.___~""" -.._.._-_..-~----,-
--------..---~-------_._-.-~._---~_._-.--
- 0-.,
-, ., )
~~8 '
-",-1 .~
J
i
I -~"'.
I 3:1
",",'
\
I
1
I! ---.;.
I I
!~ !~
,9 i ,;; ,
'0 .. I
,Z ~[!J
> m
~
~
"
m
q
is
z
.
.::.:;..- .
..."-.....,;
'l
l!IElEl8 lEI 138 ElEl8
; " I~ ~ ~~ . !"I H I 0
I ~ o~ ~ ! i. ~
'I jl ~ h g 1. . ~ ~ m
, .! ~i ~_ h I ~ ~ ;:tl
, I ,;r' . I" ~
j I :, "0 I ~ 1 ~ 1 r'
. H ~: i' 'i':::
jl.. 0;' /'1'1
.p iH rrl
;~ ~ ~ i 0
~! i ~ z
~~! ~ ~O
~e~' .
~n I
. ,
! ~
~
;~ Ijll/ran!1
~ II 11l!!I:
~_I____imLj_i " "" "
:... ~~,"?1 i Proposed BUIldmg Setnons & Elevnuons
"2d !
St. Rose of Limn Cacholic ChuTch
a.w.v....c..r.......
14-92
'lHIIUlAVliNUI~
-'--'-'---'-'---'-'-'--'~;..-'--'--'--'--t
f' fi "," ~., '( 1'/' !' f I
/" e~ m
, ~ 1
''el
,
1
~I
~I
II
I
'I
-I
I
I
~lll
I
I
I
I
I
I:
l'lli'!!l
l,li*.
illlllll ' I qlllill' 1I11!l!l!lliI11Im 11/',11 !I,ll 111111 I! Iii II rllll,IP,111I
ill!!!!!' . I! I!lii ,Iliil' III,'! I ill,' 'IHII If II'!
, I 1'11' ! I i I ! I I I
n II I !Ii 'm! III,III!II !IIIII UIIII!!11 iii IWl! I !lllUIll! Ill!!!!
l'!"ll""!"'i I il I r I ,I I I ,., lid! !! Ill".1
iiUhlij~llh ;I~~~ ~H ~jHrHHiU~ n~HH~~ ~H HHH ~n~ ~~~m~~ii
ill,Ei~,- h~!l!!! ';~~" U~ ~'i;~~C""""""" "...."..""".. "NN ~..... lil.lll. nll.uunu
illl !lllii' ',,' II! "!";"''''' ''''''''' '!! !"'" !I!! !!!!III!!!!'
'! I U I! !!
ii
"
;,,;,.u'" ll,:;;
I'll'''! 'ill
,I'll Ill! Ill!
!,'lli!!!i till!
Ii i ,h, Ilbl
III I II Ii ,:!l
ill I 1111 e!l!
.1 I "I' . II
!!I."lo! lu
m,lli! Iii
I Illli!il II
'P,lil,1 'I!
~ ~I~ ' ~
1I
,.
~
, ,
IIllIillD CiJ)'" " '0'", .,
I!IIIII . ,
!1. .1-
I (Iro~1 =j
~JJ.u.I.I_......
I I ! I I I i"RO[>()SEl) UNDSCAi".61 CO..'\ICI!:I'T i"LAN
Ir I'; i rp, ST, ROSE OF.LIM.-\.
~ i ~ i. C'Jltrl..' VI,,",A. CAUll<llll'l...;J 4 - ~ ;:s
~=~~~~~~m~~~~w~~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~@~~~~Q
n i!ll! IlIIl 1I11,liIli II PII II II 1i!ll!!I,
i 'llll! j! il! iliPI I i hi Iii I! II
I Ill! II I II!I!! d Ii' nlnll
: lj.l. 11"111
I lid dill.
I! III
8
(!)l
> !
i
! [)[)[>[)[>[>I
I .
I .
DRAFT ORDINANCE NO.
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ADOPTING MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION AND MITIGATION MONITORlNG AND
REPORTING PROGRAM IS-06-013, AMENDING ZONING
MAP OR MAPS ESTABLISHED BY CHULA VISTA
MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 19.18.010 TO ESTABLISH THE
PRECISE PLAN MODIFYING DISTRICT AND ADOPT
PRECISE PLAN STANDARDS FOR 3.9 ACRES AT THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF THIRD A VENUE AND "H"
STREET, CURRENL Y ZONED R-3, APARTMENT
RESIDENTIAL
I. RECITALS
A. Project Site
WHEREAS, the area of land which is the subject matter of this Ordinance is
diagrammatically represented in Exhibit "A" and hereto incorporated herein by this reference,
and commonly known as St. Rose of Lima Catholic Parish, and for the purposes of general
description consists of approximately 3.9 acres at the northeast corner of Third Avenue and "H"
Street. ("Project Site"); and,
B. Project; Application for Discretionary Approval
WHEREAS, a duly verified application was filed with the City of Chula Vista Planning
and Building Department on September 21, 2006, 2006 by St Rose of Lima Catholic Parish
(Applicant), requesting approval of a zoning modification application to establish the Precise
Plan Modifying District and adopt Precise Plan Standards for 3.9 acres know as St. Rose of Lima
project. It is currently zoned R-3, Apartment Residential; and,
C. Prior Approvals
WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee held an advertised public hearing on May 7,
2007, at 4:30 p.m. in the City Council Chambers at 276 Fourth Avenue and, after hearing staff
presentation and public testimony, voted 3-0-1-0 to approve DRC 06-50 contingent upon
approval of this Ordinance and the Ordinance entering into effect; and
D. Planning Commission Record on Application
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing on the Project
on June 27, 2007, and after hearing staff presentation and public testimony, voted 4-0-3-0 to
recommend that the City Council approve the Project, in accordance with the findings listed
below; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Department set the time and place for hearing on said Project,
and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper
of general circulation in the City, and its mailing to property owners within 500 ft. of the exterior
boundaries of the Project, at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing; and,
14-94
Ordinance No.
Page 2
WHEREAS, the proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning
Commission at the public hearing on the Project held on June 27, 2007, and the minutes and
Resolution resulting there from, are incorporated into the record ofthese proceedings; and
E. City Council Record on Application
WHEREAS, the City Clerk set the time and place for the hearing on the Project
applications and notices of the hearing, together with its purposes given by its publication in a
newspaper of general circulation in the City, and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet
of the exterior boundaries of the Project Site at least ten (10) days prior to the hearing; and
WHEREAS, the City Council held an advertised public hearing on the Project on
xxxxxxxxx, at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers at 276 Fourth Avenue; and
WHEREAS, after hearing staffs presentation and public testimony, and receiving the
recommendation of the Planning Commission, the City Council voted _-_-_ to adopt the
Mitigated Negative Declaration, (IS-06-013) and approve the Project, in accordance with the
findings listed below; and
F. Discretionary Approvals Resolution Ordinance
WHEREAS, at the same City Council hearing, at which the Ordinance was introduced,
for first reading ( ,2007), the City Council of the City ofChula Vista approved Resolution
number _by which it approved a Conditional Use Permit for the Project Site.
NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby finds,
determines and ordains as follows:
A. Certification of Compliance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed project for
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and has conducted an Initial Study,
IS-06-013 in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. Based upon the results
of the Initial Study, the Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that the project could
result in significant impacts on the environment. However, revisions to the project made by or
agreed to by the applicant would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly
no significant effects would occur; therefore, the Environmental Review Coordinator has
prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration, IS-06-013 and associated Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program.
B. Independent Judgment ofthe City Council
WHEREAS, the City Council considered Mitigated Negative Declaration IS-06-013
together with any comments received during the public review process; and
WHEREAS, the City Council further finds that on the basis of the whole record before it
(including the initial study and any comments received), the project could result in significant
effects on the environment. However, revisions to the project made by or agreed to by the
14-95
Ordinance No.
Page 3
applicant would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant
effects would occur; and
WHEREAS, the Mitigated Negative Declaration and other related materials are located in
the Planning and Building Department and maintained by the custodian of said documents who
is the Director of Planning and Building. This constitutes the record of proceedings upon which
this adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration is based, and
WHEREAS, the City Council has exercised their independent review and judgment and
concurs with the Planning Commission, and Environmental Review Coordinator's determination
that Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS-06-013), in the form presented, has been prepared in
accordance with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), the State
CEQA Guidelines and the Environmental Review Procedures of the City of Chula Vista and
adopts the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
(1S-06-0 13).
C. The zoning modification of the Project Site is consistent with the City of Chula
Vista General Plan, as approved on December 13,2005, and public necessity, convenience, the
general welfare and good zoning practice support the amendment to the Municipal Code.
D. The City Of Chula Vista Zoning Map established by Section 19.18.010 of the
Chula Vista Municipal Code is amended to modify the zoning of the Project Site as depicted in
Exhibit "A" from the R-3 (Apartment Residential) Zone to the R-3-P, Apartment Residential
Zone with Precise Plan Modifying District, including Property Development Standards as
represented in Exhibit B.
FINDINGS FOR APPROVAL OF REZONE AND PRECISE PLAN, INCLUDING PRECISE
PLAN STANDARDS.
Pursuant to Section 19.56.041 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, the City Council of the City
of Chula Vista finds that the following circumstances are evident, which allows the application
of the "P" Precise Plan Modifying on the Project Site:
I. That such use will not under the circumstances of the particular case be detrimental to
the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity or
injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity.
Establishing the Precise Plan Modifying District and Precise Plan Standards to guide
the redevelopment of the project site will provide the project designer with sufficient
flexibility to create a more efficient site design, suitable for an urbanized area. The
precise plan standards are intended to address specific site design constraints and
opportunities and protect the residential neighborhood to the east. Thus, establishing
the precise plan modifying district will not be detrimental to the health, safety or
general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity.
2. That such plan satisfies the following principles for amendment of the "P" modifying
district as set forth in CVMC 19.56.041:
14-96
Ordinance No.
Page 4
The property or areas to which the P modifying district is applied is an area
adjacent and contiguous to a zone allowing different land uses, and the
development of a precise plan will allow the area so designated to coexist between
land usages which might otherwise prove incompatible.
The site is adjacent and contiguous to the newly adopted Urban Core Specific Plan
(UCSP) on three sides (north, south and west). The UCSP promotes a development
pattern, which facilitate a compact urban environment, which is pedestrian friendly.
These development standards include: (I) zero building setbacks from all adjacent
street sides; (2) increased building height; (3) increased fence height to 8 feet along
eastern property line; and (4) minimal on-site surface parking with remaining parking
off-site. The zero building setback line with on-site parking to the east, behind the
buildings, which will front along the western portion of the site facing Third A venue
and H Street. The proposed building height of 54 feet will be similar to that
established by the Gateway structure (approximately 56 feet) to the west as well as by
anticipated building heights up to 84 feet as allowed under the UCSP.
3. That any exceptions granted which may deviate from the underlying zoning
requirements shall be warranted only when necessary to meet the purpose and
application of the Precise Plan. Development of the lot using the development
standards of the R-3 zone would limit the ability of the applicant to propose a design
which:
The requested deviations under the Precise Plan are necessary in order to achieve a
consistent urban-type development similar to the existing and proposed surrounding
development to the west, north and south. The surrounding Urban Core Specific Plan
promotes a development pattern, which facilitate a compact urban environment,
which is pedestrian friendly. The proposed precise plan development standards
include: (I) zero building setbacks from all adjacent street sides: (2) increased
building height; (3) increased fence height to 8 feet along eastern property line; and
(4) minimal on-site surface parking with remaining parking off-site. The zero
building setback line with on-site parking to the east will facilitate placing building
frontage along the western portion of the site facing Third Avenue and H Street. The
proposed building height of 54 feet will allow a building height similar to that
established by the Gateway structure (approximately 56 feet) to the west as well as by
anticipated building heights up to 84 feet as allowed under the UCSP.
4. That the approval of this plan will conform to the General Plan and the adopted
policies of the City OfChula Vista.
The Precise Plan Modifying District and Precise Plan Standards will conform to both
the General Plan as well as the newly adopted Urban Core Specific Plan, whose
boundaries surround the project site on three sides. The increased flexibility inherent
in the Precise Plan Standards will guide the development or redevelopment of the
project site will provide the project designer with sufficient flexibility to create a
more efficient site design, suitable for an urbanized area. This is consistent with the
goals and policies of the newly adopted General Plan.
14-97
Ordinance No.
Page 5
F. The Precise Plan and Precise Standards as depicted in Exhibits B are adopted and
are supported by the required findings (CYMC Section 19.56.041, as outlined above.
II. APPROVAL OF ZONE MODIFICATION
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby approve the rezone to establish
the Precise Plan Modifying District and adopting Precise Plan Standards for the Project Site as
represented in Exhibit "B".
III. EFFECTIVE DATE
This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force on the thirtieth day from and after its
adoption.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
James D. Sandoval
Planning and Building Director
Exhibits:
Exhibit A: Zone Modification Map
Exhibit B: Precise Plan Standards
J:\Auomey\Ordinam;eIAdopt MND & MMRP IS_06-OIJ_07_17_07.doc
14-98
CHULA VISTA PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT
LOCATOR PROJECT St. Rose of Lima Catholic
C) APPLlCAm P . h
ans
PROJECT 293 H St EXHIBIT A
ADDRESS: .
SCALE: FILE NUMBER:
NORTH No Scale PCZ-07-02/PCC-~
L:~~e Fj~~~\Locators\pCZ0702""pCC060042_CUP-zoning Modification.cdr 06.26.07
PROPOSED PRECISE PLAN STANDARDS
Minimum Building Setbacks: Third Avenue: o feet
Alvarado Street: o feet
H Street: o feet
Building Height: 54 feet (top of roof)
90 feet (top of spire)
Fence Height: 8 feet height (along interior/eastern)
I property line
Parking: 261 of required parking spaces allowed off-
site. Shared parking will be allowed in
conjunction the following: 1) parking study
showing excess parking available from
Donor during time of applicants need for
such spaces 2) copy of agreement between
Donor and Recipient.
Off-site Pedestrian Access: Modification of Section 19.62.040 of
CYMC to requrre only a two party
agreement between applicant and City
required ensuring that off-site parking
spaces will be provided.
Exhibit B
14-100
RESOLUTION NO. 2007-
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AND APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT TO ALLOW THE RENOVATION AND EXPANSION
OF AN EXISTING CHURCH/SCHOOL FACILITY KNOWN AS
ST. ROSE OF LIMA CATHOLIC PARISH LOCATED AT THE
NORTHEAST CORNER OF THIRD AVENUE AND "H"
STREET.
1. RECITALS
A Project Site
WHEREAS, the areas of land, which are the subject matter of this Resolution, are
diagrammatically represented in Exhibit "A" and hereto incorporated herein by this reference,
and commonly known as St. Rose of Lima Catholic Parish, and for the purposes of general
description consists of approximately 3.9 acres at the northeast corner of Third Avenue and "H"
Street. ("Project Site"); and,
B. Project; Application for Discretionary Approvals
WHEREAS, a duly verified application was filed with the City of Chula Vista Planning
and Building Department on January 13, 2006 by St Rose of Lima Catholic Parish (Applicant),
requesting approval of a Conditional Use Permit to renovate and expand the existing church!
school facility in three construction phases ("Project"); and,
C. Prior Discretionary Approvals
WHEREAS, the development of the Project Site has been the subject matter of various
entitlements, including Precise Plan guidelines adopted City Council Ordinance Number
on ; and
D. Planning Commission Record of Application
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing on the Project
on June 27, 2007, and after hearing staff presentation and public testimony, voted 4-0-3-0 to
recommend that the City Council approve the Project, in accordance with the findings and
subj ect to the conditions listed below; and
WHEREAS, the proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning
Commission at the public hearing on the Project held on June 27, 2007, and the minutes and
Resolution resulting there from, are incorporated into the record of these proceedings; and
1 4-1 01
Resolution No. 2007-
Page 2
E. City Council Record of Application
WHEREAS, the City Clerk set the time and place for the hearing on the Project
applications and notices of said hearings, together with its purposes given by its publication in a
newspaper of general circulation in the city, and its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of
the exterior boundaries of the Project sites at least 10 days prior to the hearing.
F. City Council Hearing
WHEREAS, a duly called and noticed public hearing on the Conditional Use Permit was
held before the City Council of the City of Chula Vista on July, 10 2007, on this Project and to
receive recommendation from the Planning Commission and Resource Conservation
Commission, and to hear public testimony with regard to same; and,
WHEREAS, the meeting was held at the time and place as advertised, namely 6:00 p.m.
July 10, 2007, in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the City Council and said
hearing was thereafter closed.
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council hereby find, determine
and resolve as follows:
II. COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA
The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed project for
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and has conducted an Initial Study,
IS-06-0 13 in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act. Based upon the results
of the Initial Study, the Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that the project could
result in significant impacts on the environment. However, revisions to the project made by or
agreed to by the applicant would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly
no significant effects would occur; therefore, the Environmental Review Coordinator has
prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration, IS-06-013 and associated Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program.
III. INDEPENDENT JUDGEMENT OF THE CITY COUNCIL
WHEREAS, the City Council found that Mitigated Negative Declaration 15-06-013 has
been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act,
and Environmental Review Procedures of the City ofChula Vista; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council considered Mitigated Negative Declaration 15-06-013
together with any comments received during the public review process; and
14-102
Resolution No. 2007-
Page 3
WHEREAS, the City Council further finds that on the basis of the whole record before it,
(including the initial study and any comments received) the project could result in significant
effects on the environment. However, revisions to the project made by or agreed to by the
applicant would avoid the effects or mitigate the effects to a point where clearly no significant
effects would occur; and
WHEREAS, the Mitigated Negative Declaration and other related materials are located in
the Planning and Building Department and maintained by the custodian of said documents who
is the Director of Planning and Building. This constitutes the record of proceedings upon which
this adoption of the Mitigated Negative Declaration is based. and
WHEREAS, the City Council found that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflected the
independent judgment of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista and adopted the Mitigated
Negative Declaration prepared for this Project.
IV. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS/ APPROVAL
A. THAT THE PROPOSED USE AT THIS LOCATION IS NECESSARY OR
DESIRABLE TO PROVIDE A SERVICE OR FACILITY WHICH WILL
CONTRIBUTE TO THE GENERAL WELL BEING OF THE NEIGHBORHOOD OR
COMMUNITY.
The existing church facility was established and has been operating since 1921 at this
location. The school was established in 1948 and has also been operating since then. The
renovation and expansion of the church campus is necessary to upgrade the facility to meet
current parish demands. The renovation/expansion of the church and school campus will also
result in a positive contribution, in terms of services and physical improvements to area
residents, to the surrounding neighborhood and overall City's urban core area. Thus, approval of
this conditional use permit is necessary and highly desirable to continue providing religious and
academic services to the neighborhood and the community in general.
B. THAT SUCH USE WILL NOT UNDER THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE
PARTICULAR CASE BE DETRIMENTAL TO THE HEALTH, SAFETY OR
GENERAL WELFARE OF PERSONS RESIDING OR WORKING IN THE VICINITY
OR INJURIOUS TO PROPERTY OR IMPROVMENTS IN THE VICINITY.
As indicated above, the church and school have been operating and serving the
community at this location since 1921 and 1948, respectively. The facility renovation is
extensive, but the expansion at build out is relatively minor except for the church/sanctuary
facility. While the school capacity will only increase by approximately 12 percent, the seating
capacity of the church will increase by 87 percent. Parking capacity will also be expanded to
insure parishioners have adequate parking available. This will be accomplished by both on- and
14-103
Resolution No. 2007-
Page 4
off-site parking. Over half of the required parking will be provided at the nearby Gateway
parking structure, accessible via pedestrian travel.. With this additional capacity, the
church/school will be able satisfy the demand for school services and parish accommodations
without impacting nearby residential and commercial areas. Thus, approval of this conditional
use permit will result in a substantial improvement to this area and enhancement to the services
already provided by the applicant to area residents.
C. THAT THE PROPOSED USE WILL COMPLY WITH THE REGULATIONS AND
CONDITIONS SPECIFIED IN THE CODE FOR SUCH USE.
All aspects of the proposed master plan CUP will comply with the regulations and
conditions specified in the Chula Vista Municipal Code for such use. The use of shared parking
to accommodate the once a week requirements generated on Sundays will be the subject of an
agreement between the applicant and the City of Chula Vista. In addition, the project conditions
of approval require the operation to be in continuing compliance with all applicable city codes
and regulations. The project has been conditioned to obtain a parking agreement (based upon an
approved parking analysis) proving they have sufficient off-site parking to provide a total 429
required parking spaces, or revise the sanctuary floor plan to reduce the seating capacity in order
to meet parking requirements.
D. THAT THE GRANTING OF THIS CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT WILL NOT
ADVERSELY AFFECT THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE ICTY OR THE ADOPTED
PLAN OF ANY GOVERNING AGENCY.
Although the property is zoned R-3, Apartment Residential, the General Plan land use
designation is Mixed Use Transit Focus Area, which could accommodate a mix of residential,
office and retail land uses. However, churches are unclassified uses in the Zoning Ordinance and
may be located in any zone, provided a conditional use permit is approved. Based on this,
Conditional Use Permit complies with the General Plan, and the Zoning Ordinance.
V. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
PLANNING & BUILDING DEPARTMENT
A. The following conditions shall be incorporated into the plan by the applicant prior to
issuance of building permits for this project, unless otherwise specified:
I. Prior to, or in conjunction with the issuance of the first building permit, pay all
applicable fees, including any unpaid balances of permit processing fees for
deposit account DQ-1299.
14-104
Resolution No. 2007-
Page 5
2. A parking management plan must be submitted to the Director of Planning and
Building, for review and approval. The management plan shall describe how
parking will be managed before and after services including the order in which
the various parking locations will be utilized with off-site parking areas being the
last area to be parked. The plan shall describe parking management at each of the
proposed three phases of construction.
3. Applicant shall prepare and submit a revised site plan reflecting the required 9'6"
dedication along the entire H Street frontage. Said plan shall shift the proposed
10-foot landscape strip shown between the two driveways along H Street behind
the ultimate right-of-way line, shifting the parking spaces accordingly. Parking
table shown on site plan shall be changed accordingly to reflect new distribution
between on and off-site parking.
4. Prior to issuance of first building permit for Phase I, applicant shall provide the
City with the following: (1) an executed copy of private parking agreement
between Gateway ("existing Donor") facility and St. Rose of Lima Catholic
Parish ("Recipient"); and, (2) an executed two party agreement between City and
applicant whereby applicant agrees to provide for a minimum of 51 off-site
parking spaces. Said agreement shall be reviewed and approved by Planning,
Engineering and City Attorney.
5. Prior to issuance of building permits for Phase III, applicant shall provide the City
with the following: (1) copy of current executed contract between parking donor
and applicant for a minimum of 257 required off-site parking spaces; (2) new
Shared Parking Study to verify parking still available; and (3) updated two party
agreement between City and applicant to provide all required parking.
6. Prior to issuance of building permits for Phase III, a final landscape and irrigation
plan prepared by a landscape architect shall be prepared and submitted for review
and approval by the City. Said plan shall reflect the changes of the revised site
plan noted in Condition 4 above.
7. The applicant shall implement to the satisfaction of the City Environmental
Review Coordinator and the City Engineer the mitigation measures identified in
the St. Rose of Lima Catholic School and Church Complex Mitigated Negative
Declaration (IS-06-0 13) and associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program.
ENGINEERING CONDITIONS
14-105
Resolution No. 2007-
Page 6
8. Prior to Phase III or any development along H Street property frontage, whichever
comes first, applicant shall obtain a construction permit from the Engineering
Department in order to widen H Street by 7'6" with a transition to existing curb
line between the two proposed driveways. New sidewalk along H Street shall be
8 feet wide and transition to existing sidewalk as approved by the City Engineer.
Relocation of any existing utilities such as storm drains or traffic signals as a
result of the street widening shall be the responsibility of the applicant.
9. Dedicate 9'6'" of right-of-way along the entire "H" Street project frontage prior
to performing street widening described in Condition 8 above. The applicant shall
dedicate right-of-way as needed along any fronting street for installation of new
driveways and/or pedestrian ramps to meet current ADA requirements.
10. An improvement plan prepared by a Registered Civil Engineer showing the street
widening on "H" Street shall be submitted to the City and said improvements
shall be guaranteed by bonding before approval of any Phase III Building Permits.
Any additional improvements required as a result of the widening (storm drain
inlet relocation, traffic signal relocation, pedestrian ramp relocation, etc.) shall be
included on the improvement plans.
FIRE DEPARTMENT CONDITIONS:
11. Building permits shall comply with 2001 California Fire Code (or adopted code at
time of permit application), and applicable Chula Vista Fire Department
regulations.
12. Prior to issuance of building permits for Phase I, an on-site fire hydrant shall be
provided on the Alvarado Street side of the proposed rolling gate for the middle
parking lot area. Said hydrant must be within 50 feet of the Fire Department
Connections.
13. Prior to issuance of building permits for Phase III, applicant shall: a) relocate the
proposed Fire Department Connection and Post Indicator Valve to the median or
other accessible location within the proposed parking lot, and b) provide an on-
site fire hydrant on the "H" Street side of the proposed rolling gates in the middle
of the parking lot area.
14. Buildings shall be protected by an approved fire sprinkler and alarm system, to
the satisfaction of the Fire Department.
15. The applicant shall comply with all other requirements of the Fire Department
including obtaining an operational permit for public assembly.
14-106
Resolution No. 2007-
Page 7
16. The applicant shall implement to the satisfaction of the City Environmental
Review Coordinator and the City Engineering Department the mitigation
measures identified in the St. Rose of Lima Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS-
06-013) and associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program.
17. The applicant shall operate the church campus in compliance with the
Performance Standards, CYMC Chapters 19.66 and Performance Standards and
Noise Control, Chapter 19.68.
B. Upon certification by the Director of Planning and Building for occupancy or establishment
of use allowed by this Conditional Use Permit, the following conditions shall apply:
I The conditions of approval for this permit shall be applied to the subject property
until such time that the conditional use permit is modified or revoked.
2 The project shall remain in compliance with all applicable conditions of approval
ofDRC-06-50.
3 The hours of operation for the project shall be as follows:
a. Before School student drop-off hours shall be Monday through Friday,
7:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m.
b. Parochial School Hours shall be Monday though Friday, 8:00 a.m. to
2:30 p.m.; Saturdays: 8:00 a.m. to 11 :00 a.m.
c. After School student pick-up hours shall be Monday through Friday,
2:30 to 3:00 p.m.
d. After School Care shall be Monday through Friday, 2:30 p.m. to 6:00 p.m.
e. The church/sanctuary service hours shall be Saturdays, 7:30 a.m. to
10:00 a.m.; 5:00 p.m. to 7:30 p.m.; Sundays, 7:00 a.m. to 8:30 p.m.
Weekday services are 6:15 a.m. and 8:00 a.m.; 5:00 p.m. to 7:30 p.m.
f. Funeral services in the church/sanctuary shall be Monday through Friday,
9:00 a.m. to noon.
g. Other liturgies in the church/sanctuary shall be on Saturdays, 10:00 a.m. to
4:00 p.m. and 7:00 p.m. to 9:30 p.m.
h. Other group meetings shall be held in the church/sanctuary Monday
through Friday during evening hours.
1. Parish Social Hall hours shall be Monday through Friday, 4:00 p.m. to
10:00 p.m.; Saturday/Sundays, 7:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. with the exception
of the upper floor, which will be utilized during normal school hours.
J. Pastoral Center hours of operation shall be Monday through Friday,
8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m.; Saturdays/Sundays from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m.
14-107
Resolution No. 2007-
Page 8
4 In the event the existing Donor Site (Gateway) being utilized for off-site parking
will no longer be available, the following process must be complied with by the
applicant to ensure all required off-site parking is provided (or cease operations to
level where parking is provided):
a. A minimum of 90 days prior to termination of existing parking agreement,
Gateway ("existing Donor") must notify St. Rose of Lima Catholic Parish
("Recipient") of intent to terminate agreement.
b. Within 5 davs of notification of termination, applicant shall inform City of
existing Donor intent to terminate agreement. Applicant shall provide City
with alternative location(s) they will propose to utilize to provide required
off-site parking. City will review proposed locations and determine if
additional discretionary approvals or additional environmental review will
be required.
c. Within 30 davs of notification of termination, applicant shall provide City
with a Shared Parking Report demonstrating availability of excess parking
on the new Donor site, which is available for used during hours of church
services.
d. Within 60 davs of notification of termination, applicant shall provide City
with I) new shared parking agreement between new Donor and Recipient,
and 2) Updated agreement between applicant and City for on-going
provision for off-site parking.
5 Applicant shall ensure operation remains in compliance with the parameters of the
use outlined in the application, the CYMC, and this Resolution, including the
following:
a. Maximum sanctuary seating shall not exceed 1,500 persons. Expansion of
capacity shall require approval of the Planning Commission.
b. School capacity (preschool-12th) shall not exceed a maximum of 400
students. Expansion of capacity shall require approval of the Planning
Commission.
c. All community service uses to be held on site shall take place entirely within
the building and shall be coordinated by the church. Periodic meetings for
civic groups shall not require individual review; however, meeting sizes shall
not exceed the stated sanctuary or room capacity.
14-108
Resolution No. 2007-
Page 9
6 This permit shall be subject to any and all new, modified or deleted conditions
imposed after approval of this permit to advance a legitimate governmental
interest related to health, safety or welfare which the City shall impose after
advance written notice to the Permittee and after the City has given to the
Permittee the right to be heard with regard thereto. However, the City, in
exercising this reserved right/condition, may not impose a substantial expense or
deprive Permittee of a substantial revenue source which the Permittee cannot, in
the normal operation of the use permitted, be expected to economically recover.
7 This permit shall become void and ineffective ifnot utilized within one year from
the effective date thereof, in accordance with Section 19.14.260 of the Municipal
Code. Failure to comply with any conditions of approval shall cause this permit to
be reviewed by the City for additional conditions or revocation.
8 The Applicant/owner shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend
and hold harmless City, its City Council members, officers, employees and
representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages,
demands, claims and costs, including court costs and attorney's fess (collectively,
liabilities) incurred by the City arising, directly or indirectly, from: (a) City's
approval and issuance of this Conditional Use Permit; (b) City's approval or
issuance of any other permit or action, whether discretionary or non-discretionary,
in connection with the use contemplated herein, and Applicant/operator shall
acknowledge their agreement to this provision by executing a copy of this
Conditional Use Permit where indicated below. Applicant's/operator's
compliance with this provision is an express condition of this Conditional Use
Permit and this provision shall be binding on any and all of applicant's/operator's
successors and assigns.
VI. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d)(1), NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that
the 90 day period to protest the imposition of any impact fee, dedication, reservation, or
other exaction described in this resolution begins on the effective date of this resolution
and any such protest must be in a manner that complies with Section 66020(a) and failure
to follow timely this procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, review, set
aside, void or annul imposition. The right to protest the fees, dedications, reservations, or
other exactions does not apply to planning, zoning, grading, or other similar application
processing fees or service fees in connection with this project; and it does not apply to
any fees, dedication, reservations, or other exactions which have been given notice
similar to this, nor does it revive challenges to any fees for which the Statute of
Limitations has previously expired.
VII. EXCECUTION AND RECORDATION OF RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL
14-109
Resolution No. 2007-
Page 10
The property owner and the applicant shall execute this document by signing the lines
provided below, said execution indicating that the property owner and applicant have
each read, understood, and agreed to the conditions contained herein. Upon execution,
this document shall be recorded with the County Clerk of the County of San Diego, at the
sole expense of the property owner and/or applicant, and a signed, stamped copy of this
recorded document shall be returned within ten days of recordation to the Planning and
Building Department secretary.
Failure to return said document to the Planning and Building Department secretary shall
indicate the Property owners/Applicant's desire that the project, and the corresponding
application for building permits and/or a business license, be held in abeyance without
approval. Said document will also be on file in the City Clerk's Office and known as
Document No.
Signature ofSt. Rose of Lima/293 H St.
Date
Date
Signature of Owner's Representative
VIII. CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE OF CONDITIONS
If any of the foregoing conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so
implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to
revoke or modify all approvals herein granted, deny, or further condition issuance of all
future building permits, deny, revoke, or further condition all certificates of occupancy
issued under the authority of approvals herein granted, institute and prosecute litigation to
compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. Failure
to satisfy the conditions of this Conditional Use Permit may also result in the imposition
of civil or criminal penalties.
IX. INVALIDITY; AUTOMA TIC REVOCATION
It is the intention of the Planning Commission that its adoption of this Resolution is
dependent upon the enforceability of each and every term, provision and condition herein
stated; and that in the event that anyone or more terms, provision, or conditions are
determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable,
this resolution and the Conditional Use Permit shall be deemed to be automatically
revoked and of no further force and effect.
14-110
Resolution No. 2007-
Page 10
The property owner and the applicant shall execute this document by signing the lines
provided below, said execution indicating that the property owner and applicant have
each read, understood, and agreed to the conditions contained herein. Upon execution,
this document shall be recorded with the County Clerk of the County of San Diego, at the
sole expense of the property owner and/or applicant, and a signed, stamped copy of this
recorded document shall be returned within ten days of recordation to the Planning and
Building Department secretary.
Failure to return said document to the Planning and Building Department secretary shall
indicate the Property owners/Applicant's desire that the project, and the corresponding
application for building permits and/or a business license, be held in abeyance without
approval. Said document will also be on file in the City Clerk's Office and known as
Document No.
7/;1 It 7
Date /
7/}< )tJ1
,
Date
VIII. CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE OF CONDITIONS
If any of the foregoing conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so
implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to
revoke or modify all approvals herein granted, deny, or further condition issuance of all
future building permits, deny, revoke, or further condition all certificates of occupancy
issued under the authority of approvals herein granted, institute and prosecute litigation to
compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. Failure
to satisfy the conditions of this Conditional Use Permit may also result in the imposition
of civil or criminal penalties.
IX. INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION
It is the intention of the Planning Commission that its adoption of this Resolution is
dependent upon the enforceability of each and every term, provision and condition herein
stated; and that in the event that anyone or more terms, provision, or conditions are
determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable,
this resolution and the Conditional Use Permit shall be deemed to be automatically
revoked and of no further force and effect.
14-111
Resolution No. 2007-
Page II
Presented by
Jim Sandoval
Director of Planning and Building
J:\AllOmcy\RESQICUP\PCC-06-042 (51. Rose orLimaL07-17-07.doc
An
~1Cit
14-112
Approved as to form by
CHULA VISTA PLANNING AND BUILDING D'EPARTMENT
LOCATOR PROJECT , Sl. Rose af Lima Catholic
C) APPLICANT, P 'h
ans
~~~~1: 293 H Sl. EXHIBIT A
SCALE: FILE NUMBER:
NORTH No Scale PCZ-07-02lPCC-oa-~ 3 .
_____~Gabe FiI~~\LocatorS\DCZ0702 Dcc060D42 CUP-zoning Modification.cdr 06.26.07