HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 1992/09/08
.., ) \
I" d I' ., 1\. I
ec are unaer penalty of perjury that I ani
em?lo:fe: by the City of Chuia Vista in the
~fflce 0'- tile City Cieri! and that I posted
t,lIS AgenJa/Notice on the Bulletin Board at
the PUbli~ &e~es Buildin;; and at City Hall on
Tuesday, September 8,1992 DATED, -t /'7'/ ;12 SIGNED Co,;/' ~-~. _.. Council Chambers
6:00 p.m. . (~~ ,~ Public Services Building
/
Resrular Meetinsr of the City of Chula Vista City Council
CAlL TO ORDER
1.
ROll CAlL:
Councilmembers Horton _, Malcolm _, Moore _' Rindone _, and Mayor
Nader _
2. PLEDGE OF AlLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG. SILENT PRAYER
3. APPROVAL OF MINlITES: August 18, 1992 and September 1, 1992
4. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY:
a. Oath of Office: Catherine Reita Jamison. Town Centre Project Area Committee
CONSENT CALENDAR
(Items 5 through 9)
The staffrecommendations regarding the following items listed under the Consent Calendar will be enacted by the
Council by one motion without discussion unless a Councilmember, a member of the public or City staff requests
that the item be pulled for discussion. If you wish 10 speak on one of these items, please fill out a "Request to
Speak Form" available in the lobby and submit it 10 the City Clerk prior 10 the meeting. (Complete the green form
to speak in favor of the staff recommendation; complete the pink form to speak in opposition to the staff
recommendation.) Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be discussed after Action Items and Boards and
Commission Recommendations. Items pulled by the public will be the rust items of business.
5. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS:
a. Claims Against the City: Claimant No.1. Ms. Dorothy M. Lopez and Claimant No.2 - Mr.
Guillermo Catalan, c/o Paula S. Rosenstein, Attorney at Law, 501 W. Broadway, Suite 1350,
San Diego, CA 92101; Claimant NO.3 - Amir Kolahzadeh, Law Offices of Julie Palaferri, 835
Fifth Avenue, Suite 405, San Diego, CA 92101; Claimant No.4. Mr. Robert C. Miller, 3535
Boston Avenue, San Diego, CA 92113; and Claimant No.5 - Ms. Beaulah G. Farmer, c/o
Riberio Law Corporation, Box 928, San Diego, CA 92112. It is the recommendation of the
City's claims adjustors, Carl Warren & Company, concurred by Risk Management that the
claims be denied.
6. RESOLlJI10N 16801 ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR "SEWER
ENLARGEMENT IN QillNTARD STREET BETWEEN THIRD AVENUE AND
SECOND AVENUE AND IN SECOND AVENUE BETWEEN PALOMAR
STREET AND QillNTARD STREET" - On 8/19/92, sealed bids Were
received by the Public Works Director. The work to be done consists of
replacing an existing 8.inch sewer with a new 15.inch sewer main. Staff
Agenda
.2.
September 8, 1992
recommends approval of the resolution awarding the contract to Ortiz
Corporation in the amount of $103,970. (Director of Public Works)
7. RESOLUTION 16802 AUTIlORIZlNG THE ADDITION OF CIP TF151, A LEFr TURN TRAFFlC
SIGNAL ON OTAY LAKES ROAD AT RIDGEBACK ROAD, TO FISCAL YEAR
1992/93 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM; AND APPROPRIATING
$11,200 TIIEREFOR . In 1991, staff received a letter from Bonita Vista
Junior High School requesting that a left turn traffic signal phase be
installed on Otay Lakes Road at Ridgeback Road/Canyon Drive. The
requested green time for a left turn movement will provide protection and
reduce delay for the large number of school buses making the turn in the
morning. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Public
Works) 4/5th's vote required.
8. RESOLUTION 16803 APPROPRIATING FUNDS, ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT
FOR "SIDEWALK INSTALLATION ON THE SOUTIl SIDE OF E STREET
FROM CORTE MARIA AVENUE TO HILLTOP DRIVE". On 8/26/92, sealed
bids were received by the Public Works Director. The work includes traffic
control, removal and disposal of existing improvements, relocation of
existing irrigation line, sidewalk, pedestrian ramps, keystone retaining wall
at back of sidewalk, protection and restoration of existing improvements,
installation of trees and shrubs, construction surveying, and other
miscellaneous work. Staff recommends approval of the resolution
awarding the contract to Hammer Construction in the amount of $51,87l.
(Director of Public Works) 4/5th's vote required.
9. REPORT PROPOSED MISSION STATEMENT ELEMENT FOR THREE YEAR
STRATEGIC PLAN . On 5/5/92, Council directed staff to revise the Draft
Strategic Plan to include an additional element regarding quality program
design. The report recommends a Strategic Plan Mission Statement and an
additional strategy for inclusion in the Plan. Staff recommends Council
accept the report. (Director of Parks and Recreation)
* * END OF CONSENT CALENDAR * *
PUBUC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
The following items have been advertised and/or posted as publi1: hearings as required by law. If you wish to speak
to any item, please fill out the "Request to Speak Form" available in the lobby and submit it to the CiIy Clerk prior
to the meeting. (Complete the green form to speak in favor of the staff recommendation; complete the pink form
to speak in opposition to the staff recommendation.) Comments are limited to five minutes per individuaL
10.
PUBUC HEARING
AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 1992/93 BUDGET TO ACCOUNT FOR
REVENUE REDUCTIONS FROM THE STATE OF CAUFORNIA . On
6/16/92, Council adopted the 1992/93 operating budget with the
understanding that there would be a revisiting of that budget after the
State adopted its budget and the impact of the State budget cuts on the
City were known. At the same time, a hiring freeze was imposed (except
Agenda
-3-
September 8, 1992
for certain public safety positions) in order to position the City for any
severe State revenue take-aways, which fortunately did not occur. On
9/1/92, the State budget was adopted and the major impacts of this
budget on the City are now known. A proposal for amending the City's
1992/93 budget is hereby offered in order that the City can get on with its
business of providing service to the public. Staffrecommends approval of
the resolution and elimination of the hiring freeze. (Administration)
4/Sth's vote required.
RESOLUTION 16804 APPROVING THE AMENDED BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1992/93
11.
PUBUC HEARlNG
12.
PUBUC HEARlNG
PCC-92-40: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: APPEAL OF PLANNING
COMMISSION APPROVAL OF A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCTION INTERlM
FIRE STATION NUMBER SIX AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LANE
AVENUE AND FENTON STREET; APPEllANT - CAUFORNlA LAND
ASSOCIATES - Appeal of Planning Commission approval PCC-92-40 for the
City application to construct an interim fire station at the southwest comer
of Fenton Street and Lane Avenue, 2396 Fenton Street. Staff recommends
Council conceptually approve "Option 3" and continue the public hearing
to the meeting of 9/22/92. (Director of Planning) Continued from the
8/25/92 meeting_
CONSIDERATION OF A RAISED MEDIAN ON TELEGRAPH CANYON ROAD
TIiROUGH THE INTERSECTION OF APACHE DRIVE - On 6/23/92, Council
directed staff to install a temporary sign prohibiting vehicles traveling
eastbound on Telegraph Canyon Road from turning left to northbound
Apache Drive during the weekday hours of 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. The
temporary sign is to remain in place until construction of the Telegraph
Canyon Road/Otay Lakes Road project is completed later this year. The
Council further directed staff to explore the feasibility of constructing a
raised median on Telegraph Canyon Road across Apache Drive as a
permanent solution. Staff recommends Council approve the resolution.
(Director of Public Works)
RESOLUTION 16805 AUTIlORlZING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBUC WORKS TO APPROVE A
CONSTRUCTION CHANGE ORDER ON TELEGRAPH CANYON ROAD
PHASE III WIDENING PROJECT TO CONSTRUCT A LANDSCAPED RAISED
MEDIAN ACROSS APACHE DRIVE
13.
PUBUC HEARlNG
PCA-92-01: CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 19 OF THE
MUNICIPAL CODE TO ESTABUSH PROCEDURES TO EXPEDITE
PROCESSING OF SIGN PERMITS AND TO ALLOW FOR ELECTRONIC
MESSAGE BOARD SIGNS - CIIT INITIATED - Council requested
establishment of procedures to expedite processing of sign permits, and to
allow electronic message board signs in certain limited redevelopment
areas and certain zones. Staff recommends Council find that the proposal
will have no significant environmental impacts and adopt the Negative
Declaration issued on IS-92-44 and place the ordinance on first reading.
(Director of Planning)
Agenda
ORDINANCE 2529
14.
PUBIJC HEARING
ORDINANCE 2530
-4-
September 8, 1992
AMENDING TITLE 19 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING SECTION
19.04.235 DEFINING ELECTRONIC MESSAGE BOARD SIGNS AND
AMENDING SECTION 19.60 TO ESTABIJSH PROCEDURES TO EXPEDITE
PROCESSING OF SIGN PERMITS AND TO AI1..0W FOR ELECTRONIC
MESSAGE BOARD SIGNS (first readinl()
PCZ-93-A: CONSIDERATION TO PREZONE 3.59 ACRES LOCATED AT THE
NORTH SIDE OF OTAY LAKES ROAD, EAST OF LEHIGH AVENUE - CITY
INITIATED - The ptoposed prezoning and subsequent annexation of the
property is a result of a requirement by LAFCO that the parcel be annexed
in conjunction with the annexation of the adjacent property currently being
processed under the project name of Telegraph Canyon Estates. The
annexation of the 3.59 acre parcel in conjunction with the project will
preclude the creation of a County island. Staff recommends Council place
ordinance on first reading. (Director of Planning)
AMENDING THE ZONING MAP OR MAPS ESTABIJSHED BY SECTION
19.18.010 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE PREZONlNG 3.59 ACRES NORTH OF
OTAY LAKES ROAD, EAST OF LEHIGH AVENUE TO R-l (SINGLE FAMILY
RESIDENTIAL), AND FINDING THAT SUCH ZONING ACITVITY IS EXEMPT
FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CAIJFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUAIJTY ACT (CEQA) (first readinl()
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
This is an opportunily for the general public to address the Cuy Council on any subject matter wilhin the Council's
jurisdiction that is not an item on this agenda. (State law, however, generally prohibits the City Council from
taking action on any issues not included on the posted agenda.) If you wish to address the Council on such a
subjec4 please complete the yellow "Request to Speak Under Oral Communications Form" available in the lobby
and submit it to the CiIy Clerk prior to the meeting. Those who wish to speak, please give your name and address
for record purposes and follow up action. Your time is limited to three minutes per speaker.
BOARD AND COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
This is the time the CiIy Council will consider items which have been forwarded to them for consiJleration by one
of the CiIy's Boards, Commissions and/or Commutees.
None submitted.
ACTION ITEMS
The items listed in this section of the agenda are expected to elicit substantial discussions and deliberations by the
Council, staff, or members of the general public. The items will be considered individually by the Council and staff
recommendations may in certain cases be presented in the alternative. Those who wish to speak, please [dl out
a "Request to Speak" form available in the lobby and submu it to the City Clerk prinr to the meeting. Public
comments are limited to five minutes.
None submitted.
Agenda
-5-
September 8, 1992
ITEMS PUlLED FROM TI-IE CONSENT CALENDAR
This is the time the City Council will discuss items which have been removed from the Consent Calendar. Agenda
items pulled at the request of the publif: will be conswered prior to those pulled by Councibnembers. PublU:
commentS are limited to five minutes per individuaL
OTI-IER BUSINESS
15. CI1Y MANAGER'S REPORTfS)
a. Scheduling of meetings.
16. MAYOR'S REPORT(S)
~
Ratification of appointment:
Robert Quisenberry - International Friendship Commission
Arthur Triplette - Board of Appeals
17. COUNCIL COMMENTS
ADJOURNMENT
The City Council will meet in a closed session immediately following the Council meeting to discuss:
Pending litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) - Settlement of Otay Valley
Lawsuit - Siroonian v. City of Chula Vista
Pending litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) - Velazquez v. City of Chula
Vista
The meeting will adjourn to (a closed session and thence to) a joint meeting of the City Council/Library
Board of Trustees on September 10, 1992 at 4:15 p.m. in the City Council Conference Room and thence to
the Regular City Council Meeting on September 15, 1992 at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers.
A Special Redevelopment Agency meeting will be held immediately following the City Council meeting.
September 4, 1992
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
Sid W. Morris, Assistant City Manager ~
=-----='
City Council Meeting of September 8, 1992
This will transmit the agenda and related materials for the regular City Council
meeting of Tuesday, September 8,1992. Comments regarding Written Communications
are as follows:
~
Sa. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY FILED BY DOROTHY LOPEZ,
GUILLERMO CATALAN, AMIR KOLAHZADEH, ROBERT MILLER AND BEAULAH FARMER BE
DENIED.
SWM:mab
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item :)
Meeting Date 9/8/92
ITEM TITLE:
Claims Against the city
REVIEWED BY:
Director of Personnel {)g-
ci ty Manager J6t ~6 t~\
(4/5ths Vote: Yes___ No~)
SUBMITTED BY:
claimant No.1:
Claimant No.2:
Ms. Dorothy M. Lopez
Mr. Guillermo Catalan
c/o Paula S. Rosenstein
Attorney at Law
501 W. Broadway, suite 1350
San Diego, CA 92101
On AUgust 19, 1992, claims were filed against the city by Ms.
Dorothy M. Lopez and Mr. Guillermo Catalan, for personal injuries they
allegedly received on February 26, 1992, when an employee of Chula vista
Transit molested and assaulted Ms. Lopez in the presence of Mr. Catalan.
Both claimants allege embarrassment, humiliation and emotional trauma and
seek damages within the jurisdiction of the superior Court.
city bus service was provided contractually by American Transit cor-
poration at the time of this incident. The agreement between American
Transit and the South Coast organization operating Transit (SCOOT) con-
tained a hold harmless clause and provided for indemnification. Because
the city has neither jurisdiction nor control over transit complaints, it
is the recommendation of the city's claims adjustors, Carl Warren & Com-
pany, and Risk Management staff that these claim be denied.
Claimant No.3:
Amir Kolahzadeh
Law Offices of Julie palaferri
835 Fifth Avenue, suite 405
San Diego, CA 92101
On August 18, 1992, a claim for $1,000,000.00 was filed against the
city by Mr. Amir Kolahzadeh, for injuries he allegedly received on
February 27, 1992, when he was taken hostage at the ReadiCare Center by a
murder suspect being pursued by Chula vista police Officers. The claimant
alleges extreme emotional distress including symptoms of post-traumatic
stress syndrome and alleges the city of Chula vista is responsible for
negligent pursuit and negligent inspection of the Readicare Center.
Due to remote liability on the part of
dation of the city's claims adjustors, Carl
Management, that this claim be denied.
the City, it is the recommen-
Warren & company, and Risk
Form A-113 (Rev. 11/79)
50...-J
ITEM
MEETING DATE 9/8/92
Claimant No.4:
Mr. Robert C. Miller
3535 Boston Avenue
San Diego, CA 92113
On August 17, 1992, a claim for $200,000.00 was filed against the
city by Mr. Robert c. Miller, for personal injuries he received when
struck by a suspect vehicle being pursued by Chula vista Police Officers.
The police vehicle was not involved in the collision and was following pur-
sui t policy.
Although liability is questionable, we are continuing our investiga-
tion and it is desirable to start the statute of limitations. It is the
recommendation of our claims adjustors, Carl Warren & company, concurred in
by Risk Management, that this claim be denied.
Claimant No.5:
Ms. Beaulah G. Farmer
c/o Ribeiro Law corporation
Box 928
San Diego, CA 92112
On August 3, 1992, a claim for $100,000.00 was filed against the
city by Ms. Beaulah Farmer, for personal injuries she received when she
tripped and fell in an area adjacent to the roadway at 800 Marina Parkway.
The incident occurred in the Marina View Park area while under construc-
tion.
Although liability is questionable, we are continuing our investiga-
tion and it is desirable to start the statute of limitations. It is the
recommendation of our claims adjustors, Carl Warren & company, concurred in
by Risk Management, that this claim be denied.
RECOMMENDATION: Deny the above five claims.
j
S~-2..
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
REVIEWED BY:
Item lo
Meeting Date 9/8/92
RESOLUTION I ~ ~O \ Accepting bids and awarding contract
for "Sewer enlargement in Ouintard Street between Third Avenue
& Second Avenue and in Second Avenue between Palomar Street
& Ouintard Street in the City of Chula Vista, CA"
Director of Public wor~fI:
City Manager J~ h~(~!1
ITEM TiTlE:
SUBMITTED BY:
(4/5ths Vote: Yes_No..XJ
At 2:00 p.m. on August 19, 1992 in Conference 1 in the Public Services Building, the
Director of Public Works received sealed bids for "Sewer enlargement in Ouintard
Street between Third Avenue & Second Avenue and in Second Avenue between
Palomar Street & Ouintard Street in the City of Chula Vista, CA." The work to be
done consists of replacing an existing 8-inch sewer with a new 15-inch sewer main.
The existing sewer is presently overloaded and is being replaced to provide additional
sewer capacity for existing and future flows. The new main will be at the same
horizontal location as the existing main. The work includes excavation and grading,
asphalt concrete pavement, process miscellaneous base, shoring, replacement of
existing manholes, reconstruction of base of existing manholes, sewer laterals, sewer
lateral connections, construction surveying, jacking the carrier pipe or boring a tunnel
for sewer beneath twin culvert pipes, placement of cement slurry backfill, preservation
and restoration of property and other miscellaneous work shown on the plans.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council accept bids and award contract to Ortiz
Corporation in the amount of $103,970.00.
BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
Bids were received from six contractors as follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Ortiz Corporation - Chula Vista
J. E. Brokaw and Sons, Inc. - Escondido
Detrich Corporation - EI Cajon
RTB General Engineering Co., Inc. - Lakeside
Arrieta Construction, Inc. .. EI Cajon
San Diego Equipment Rentals, Inc. - San Diego
$103,970.00
141,351.00
175,250.00
176,457.00
213,059.00
219,765.00
The low bid by Ortiz Corporation is below the engineer's estimate of $244,500.00 by
$140,530.00 or 57 percent. The major areas of difference between the engineer's
estimate and that of the low bidder were in the unit prices for the 15-inch sewer main
and shoring. The difference in these two items alone was over $125,000.00. Staff
10 ~ \
Page 2, Item 10
Meeting Date 9/8/92
based the engineer estimate on two past sewer projects done more than two years
ago. One was a sewer rehabilitation project and the other was the installation of a
sewer main south of Quintard Street. Both of these projects had average bid prices
more in the range of what staff estimated for the cost for the installation of this 15-
sewer main.
Unfortunately, staff has not recently received bids on a project similar to the one
being constructed and therefore was surprised at the excellent bids obtained.
Since the low bidder had not performed any previous work for the City, staff
requested a list of client references. A check of these references indicated the
contractor's work ranged from satisfactory to excellent. One of the clients was
planning to have this firm do some additional underground work on phase two of their
project. The bid received from Ortiz Construction was excellent. Therefore, staff
recommends awarding the contract to Ortiz Construction Company.
Attached is a copy of the contractor's disclosure statement.
FINANCIAL STATEMENT:
FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION
1. Contract Amount $103,070.00
2. Contingencies (approx. 10%) 11,030.00
TOTAL FUNDS FOR CONSTRUCTION $115,000.00
FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION AND STAFF
EXPENSES
1. Second Avenue between Quintard and
Palomar sewer account $249,512.46
TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION
AND STAFF EXPENSES $249,512.46
FISCAL IMPACT: Upon completion of the project it will require routine City
maintenance.
SH,SB/ENGINEER/AGENDAlSEWERlRG
083192
b~z./,-.J
.
THE ClTI" OF CHULA HSTA PAR1Y DISCLOSVRl:: Sl:A7'EMENT
Statement of disclosure of certain ownership interests, payments, or campaign contributions, on all matters
which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council, Planning Commission, and all other
'iciaJ bodies. The following information must be disclosed:
1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the contract, i.e., contractor,
subcontractor, material supplier.
Bud!. /"""~")
::f^dU.......,."I S-<pp I"
..
If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all
individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership
interest in the partnership.
111/J/lut'lIb . E. tJ I+'7
.1..~ C. 0/1> L
-r~<.. O. OI1"h
~
".
If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is non-profit organization or a trust, list the names
of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or
trustor of the trust.
Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of the City staff,
Boards, Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months? Yes
No...1L If yes, please indicate person(s):
5. Please identify each and every person, including any agents, employees, consultants or independent
contractors who you have assigned to represent you before the City in this maller.
BJf -; ",eft.." ;y.,. - c,.., Pr..J.
In (JM-r1 J......N'~ ~...... .a,~.... {J,....:-.."
. AI>'r-r €~
6. Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggregate, contributed more than $1.000 to a
Councilmember in the current or preceding election period? Yes _ No V If yes, state which
Councilmember(s):
~ is defined as: "Allyindi,'idllnl,jirm, co.pnrln~rsllip,joillll'cnlllrc, nssocinrioll, socinl c1l1b.[rnrcrnnl orgnniznrinll, corpomtion,
<>/tIIl', mlS/, rcecil'er, s)'ndicnte, Ihis nnd nn)' olher COIl1llY, cify nnd COIlIlI1)', ci/); mllllicipnli/); dislricl or 0111" politicnl SIlDd,,'isivlI,
or any other group or combinnrion lJcting as (J ul1it:
(:'\OTE: Atlach additional pages 3S ncccss3ry)
Dale: <;; !t~/tj? _
I I
! \.;, '.\ D1SClOS[T'\T]
+/~-
Signature of contr;Jctor/applicant
\ok.. O. Or1'l"l
Print or type name of contractor/applicant
(Ih'\IWd II ~1I'If'J
~~.3
~ I i
~I .\
l1l\
1
I
_ ----l
---,
I I
I I'
tt:11 .j'
~ I'
1'>1 I
"'I .
~I i!:
DRAWN BY
DATE
I
~
! ~ II :
~ ~ I I
~ r;:1 ~
~ ~ I I
~ lIj' I Q.
_ -:E"CO/,!'? _ _ _ ----.l I A V~I./E" ~
t:-
---
---
I
~
I
I'
r,----
I ~ . . . .
i'
I.
i:
---
---
I 1
I ~-,
====4 ~-I
~ I ,--- -I
~ 1 t---I
~I' ~=I
~ 1 I I
~ '!lTi _
THIRD i) i rr A VE"NfiE'-
TITLE
w.o.
SEWER ENLARGEMENT
IN DUINTAflJ ST. BET. THIFlJ AYE. G SECIJfIJ AYE. ANJ IN SECIJfIJ AYE. BET. PALOIIAR ST. G OUINTAflJ ST.
b~lf
RESOLUTION NO. 1iJ,~O I
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING
CONTRACT FOR "SEWER ENLARGEMENT IN QUINTARD
STREET BETWEEN THIRD AVENUE AND SECOND AVENUE
AND IN SECOND AVENUE BETWEEN PALOMAR STREET
AND QUINTARD STREET IN THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA, CA"
WHEREAS, at 2:00 p.m. on August 19, 1992 in Conference 1
in the Public Services Building, the Director of Public Works
received the following six sealed bids for "Sewer enlargement in
Quintard Street between Third Avenue & Second Avenue and in Second
Avenue between Palomar Street & Quintard Street in the city of
Chula Vista, CA.":
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Ortiz Corporation - Chula vista
J. E. Brokaw and Sons, Inc. - Escondido
Detrich Corporation - El Cajon
RTB General Engineering Co., Inc. - Lakeside
Arrieta Construction, Inc. - El Cajon
San Diego Equipment Rentals, Inc. - San Diego
$103,970.00
141,351.00
175,250.00
176,457.00
213,059.00
219,765.00
WHEREAS, the low bid by Ortiz Corporation is below the
engineer's estimate of $244,500.00 by $140,530.00 or 57 percent
with the major areas of difference between the engineer's estimate
and that of the low bidder being in the unit prices for the 15-inch
sewer main and shoring; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends awarding the contract to the
lowest responsible bidder who has assured the City that they are a
licensed contractor who can produce an acceptable performance bond.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula vista does hereby accept said six bids and award
the contract for sewer enlargement in Quintard Street between Third
Avenue and Second Avenue and in Second Avenue between Palomar
Street and Quintard Street to Ortiz Corporation in the amount of
$103,970.00.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor is hereby
authorized and directed to execute said contract for and on behalf
of the City.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
.ll~ }.. yCj7 '(-{'>--
D. Richard Rudql~, ssistant
city Attorney \..'
F:\home\attomey\sewerlrg
b~S
COUNCil AGENDA STATEMENT
Item f
Meeting Date 9/8/92
ITEM TITLE: RESOLUTION 1'- ~O :z- Authorizing the addition of CIP TF151, a left turn
traffic signal on Otay lakes Road at Ridge back Road, to FY 1992-93
Capital Improvement Program; and appropriate $11,200 therefore.
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public Works ~
REVIEWED BY: City Manager.j(1 ,~~;1 (4/5ths Vote: Yes-X-No-l
In September 1991, staff received a letter from Bonita Vista Junior High School requesting
that a left turn traffic signal phase be installed on Otay lakes Road at Ridgeback
Road/Canyon Drive. The requested green time for a left turn movement will provide
protection and reduce delay for the large number of school buses making the turn in the
morning.
Staff has reviewed the request from the school district and recommends amending the
current FY 1992-93 Capital Improvement Program to include a left turn traffic signal
improvement project on Otay Lakes road at Ridgeback Road/Canyon Drive.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council:
1. Amend the current FY 1992-93 Capital Improvement Program.
2. Appropriate $11,200 for installation of a left turn traffic signal on Otay lakes Road
at Ridgeback Road/Canyon Drive from the unappropriated balance of the Traffic
Signal funds to 600-6005-TF151.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
The Bonita Vista Junior High School requested that a left turn traffic signal phase (green
arrow phase) be installed on Otay Lakes road at Ridgeback Road/Canyon Drive to better
serve a large number of school buses delivering students to the Bonita Vista Junior High
School. Additionally, we received a classification survey study from Girl Scout Troop 5070
(count of pedestrians, bicycles, and cars) that entered the intersection for the period of
3:15 to 4:00 p.m. Unfortunately, the letter from the Girl Scout Troop was unclear in
describing what they saw as dangerous situations. Staff attempted to contact Mrs.
Gardner, the Girl Scout Troop leader, to obtain clarification of the troop letter and discuss
staff observations at the subject intersection, but were unsuccessful. Apparently Mrs.
Gardiner has moved out of the area. Mr. Jerry Larusa, Principle of the Bonita Vista
"l-\
Page 2, Item 1
Meeting Date 9/8/92
Middle School, was contacted to see if he was aware of what they were referring to, but
he could not offer any more input. After field observation, we believe that they were
referring to unprotected left turn maneuvers. The proposed protected/permissive left turn
phasing will solve any problems.
Staff confirmed the problem of delay to the school buses by field observation during the
AM and PM peak school hours.
The signal at Otay Lakes Road and Ridgeback Road/Canyon Drive was originally
designed to provide a left turn phase, but was not installed when the signal was
constructed in 1988. At the time the signal was constructed, it was determined that low
left turning volumes could be accommodated without a left turn arrow, thereby reducing
delay to through traffic on Otay Lakes Road to a minimum. Since 1988, traffic volumes
on Otay Lakes road has grown sufficiently to reduce the gaps for the vehicles making left
turns onto Ridgeback Road. Additionally, the volume of vehicles making left turns onto
Ridgeback Road or Canyon Drive has grown considerably to warrant left turn phase on
Otay Lakes Road.
The proposed left turn phase is basically needed in the morning peak period for the
school buses, staff recommend that a protected/permissive left turn phases be installed
on Otay Lakes Road only.
The estimated cost of the project is as follows:
Construction
Contingencies (20%)
Design (10%)
Administration & Inspection (10%)
$8,000
1600
800
800
$11,200
All interested parties, including the Girl Scouts, have been notified of this agenda item.
FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are available in the Traffic Signal Fees Account 600-6005-TF151
to cover the total cost of the project.
ZAO:SB: ENGINEERlAGENDAlRIDGBACK.SIG
062592
1-2-
RESOLUTION NO. (68D~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING THE ADDITION OF CIP
TF151, A LEFT TURN TRAFFIC SIGNAL ON OTAY
LAKES ROAD AT RIDGEBACK ROAD, TO FY 1992-93
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM; AND APPROPRIATE
$11,200 THEREFOR
WHEREAS, in September 1991, staff received a letter from
Bonita vista Junior High School requesting that a left turn traffic
signal phase be installed on Otay Lakes Road at Ridgeback
Road/Canyon Drive; and
WHEREAS, the requested green time for a
movement will provide protection and reduce delay for
number of school buses making the turn in the morning;
left
the
and
turn
large
WHEREAS, staff has reviewed the request from the school
district and recommends amending the current FY 1992-93 Capital
Improvement Program to include a left turn traffic signal
improvement project on Otay Lakes road at Ridgeback Road/Canyon
Drive.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula vista does hereby amend the current FY 1992-93
Capital Improvement Program authorizing the addition of CIP TF151,
a left turn traffic signal on Otay Lakes Road and Ridgeback Road.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby
appropriate $11,200 for installation of a left turn traffic signal
on Otay Lakes Road at Ridgeback Road/Canyon Drive from the
unappropriated balance of the Traffic Signal Fund 211 to 600-6005-
TF151.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
1~1,f~Ll____
D. R1chard RUdolf,lAssistant
City Attorney \.. - /
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
F:\home\attomey\ridgback
l'~
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
REVIEWED BY:
Item ~
Meeting Date 9/08/92
RESOLUTION I b'l!5D ~ Appropriating funds, accepting bids and
awarding contract for "Sidewalk Installation on the south side of
"E" Street from Corte Maria Avenue to Hilltop Drive in the City of
Chula Vista, CA"
Director of Public Wor.k ~~s . /
City Manager-JG ~~ (4/5ths Vote: YesXNo_1
ITEM TITLE:
SUBMITTED BY:
At 2:00 p.m. on August 26, 1992 in Conference Room 3 in the Public Services
Building, the Director of Public Works received sealed bids for "Sidewalk Installation
on the south side of "E" Street from Corte Maria Avenue to Hilltop Drive in the City
of Chula Vista, CA". The work includes traffic control, removal and disposal of
existing improvements, relocation of existing irrigation line, sidewalk, pedestrian
ramps, keystone retaining wall at back of sidewalk, protection and restoration of
existing improvements, installation of trees and shrubs, construction surveying and
other miscellaneous work.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council: 1) appropriate $22,520 from fund balance of
Fund 253 - Transportation Partnership Fund to Sidewalk Safety Program - STL-205;
2) accept bids and award contract to Hammer Construction in the amount of
$51,871.
BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
Construction of the sidewalk along the south side of "E" Street was included in the
1992-93 budget. The purpose of the project is to construct the missing sidewalk
between Corte Maria Avenue and Hilltop Drive.
Bids for construction of this project were received from three contractors as follows:
1.
2.
3.
Hammer Construction - Chula Vista
Concrete Contractors Interstate - San Diego
Caves, Inc. - San Diego
$51,871.00
56,822.50
59,760.00
The low bid by Hammer Construction is above the engineer's estimate of $32,340 by
$19,531 or 60 percent. All three bids received were in the same general ballpark.
'6 - I
Page 2, Item t
Meeting Date 9/08/92
Staff has also evaluated the bid item by item because of the difference between the
low bid and the engineer estimate. The majority of the difference is in two bid items:
removal and disposal of existing improvements and retaining wall. Staff has reviewed
our estimates on these items and believe that, in retrospect, they were low. On the
retaining wall, the type of construction proposed, a low interlocking block, requires
no foundation and is less expensive than the standard block wall. However, since we
have not had any experience with this wall, we relied on estimates from the
manufacturer's representative and estimated the cost at $15,840. The low bidder bid
$20,592, second low bidder bid $28,800 and the high bidder bid $17,640. Based
on our lack of previous experience with this item and the bids, staff feels comfortable
with the bid on this item.
On the removal and disposal item, staff has been continually lowering our estimated
prices based on recent bids, most of which have been bigger projects. The total bids
on this item ranged from $11,830 from the low bidder to $19,670 from the high
bidder indicate that the low bidder's proposal is probably appropriate.
Several of the other items had minor increases which, cumulatively, add to the higher
bid. All of these increases can adequately be explained by the small size of this
project as opposed to our normal project size. Therefore, staff does not believe
rebidding the project would necessarily result in lower bid prices.
Based on current estimates of inspection costs, staff is also requesting additional
funds to fully reimburse the General Fund for staff costs.
Attached is a copy of the contractor's disclosure statement.
Staff has also completed reference checks on the contractor and found them
acceptable.
FINANCIAL STATEMENT:
FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION
1. Contract Amount $51,871
2. Contingencies (approx. 10%) 5,129
3. Staff Cost (design and inspection) 15,500
TOTAL FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION $72,500
8"-2
Page 3, Item '8'-
Meeting Date 9/08/92
FUNDS A V AILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION
1. Sidewalk Safety Program - STL-205 $49,980
2. Appropriation of Funds from Fund 253 -
Transportation Partnership Fund (SB 300
reimbursement) to Sidewalk Safety 22,520
Program
TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION $72,500
FISCAL IMPACT: The existing funding is the Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities portion
of TDA financing approved by SANDAG. The City's request for $95,000 in TDA
funds, which would have been sufficient to cover these costs, was cut by SANDAG
to $50,000. Therefore, additional funds are being requested for this project to cover
construction and staff costs. After construction, the sidewalk will require only routine
maintenance.
SH :AS-OOB
Sa,ENGINEER/AGENDNSIDEWAlK
090392
f-3/ g-~
THE crrr OF CHUU. HSTA PAR11' DlSCLOSVRJ:; Sl'Al'EMENT
\
Jrement of disclosure of certain ownership interests, payments, or campaign contributions, on all matters
,'hich will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council, Planning Commission, and all other
'ficial bodies. The following information must be disclosed:
List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the contract, i.e., contractor,
subcontractor, material supplier.
\4a NvmeF (' "*"' ~~D~ A,CV"\.
.
,.
If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all
individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership
interest in the partnership.
~~
':
,
".
If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is non-profit organization or a trust, list the names
of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or
trustor of the trust.
JlJ1+
t'
'-
Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of the City staff,
Boar~ Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months? Yes_
No If yes, please indicate person(s):
5.
Please identify each and e\'ery person, including any agents, employees, consultants or independent
contractors who you have assigned to represent you before the City in this matter.
..lJ.fPt-
6.
Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggregate, contributed more than $ J,O(J() to a
Councilmember in the current or preceding election period? Yes _ No L If yes, state which
Councilmember(s):
PI.'r..;on is defined as: "Any indiddllnl, firm, co-pnrl11rrslrip, joint \'cnfltu, associntioJf, social clllh,frnternnl organization, C01POl"(lt;Oll,
('Sltl/C'. m<St, rrcri\'er, sy"dica/r, tltis and allY o/lta COIIIII)', cil)' alld counll)', cil)', mUllicipality, district or other politicnl sllhd,,'iJlVII,
or nil)' orller group or combinntion nCliJlg as n Ifni/."
Date:
i"nature of cont actor/applicant
(:'\OTE: Alt3Ch addilional pages 3' necessary)
'-"
J'h 1"'r-f'.\ \ 5("(',1::tJ.\. 0. (V\ t/V\.~ J.r
Print or type n:llne of contractor/applicant
IHn,",.,l II ';1"'llj
! \.;, \.\ DlSCLOSr. ""11
~-~
'------, f-( rf
I; :-------
i t; I~ r------
------i '~ I:
\ : ~ 1\ ~
'~ ~ \~ ~ ~ ~
I \" l ~
1 ~ \ ~\, u! /_.....\
1 \ ' , \.... \, \ I
-L " \ ~ \ .... \\ :
7~~?~~~ ' \ \ ~\ \ \
" , 7~ \. - ----4) J :
/ /' I,' \, '.\ \ \ !13 ,----
" \" ~ \1 \ ~. :
/ ~ \ \ \ I~ 1----
------~ \ \. \ II.:
1____
"', ; " ~ 6' I
"~/ \ ~ i----
" ~
,,-----~ . ,
\ ~~ \ ~,
__-----J \ \----
CORTE MARIA .-t :5\1
--~~~=--I f~ll----
(J")
PREP ARED BY:
~~
~
SCALE:1"= 100'
DRAUN BY: TITLE:
CESAR MAGBUHAT SIDEWALK INST ALLA TION
DATE: SHEET ON SOUTH SIDE OF "E" STREET
9/3/92 OF SHTS. FAD C AT V OP
&-b" /e-&
APPROVED BY:
RESOLUTION NO. 11080.a
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROPRIATING FUNDS, ACCEPTING
BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR "SIDEWALK
INSTALLATION ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF "E" STREET
FROM CORTE MARIA AVENUE TO HILLTOP DRIVE IN
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CA"
WHEREAS, at 2:00 p.m. on August 26, 1992 in Conference
Room 3 in the Public Services Building, the Director of Public
Works received the following three sealed bids for "Sidewalk
Installation on the south side of "E" Street from Corte Maria
Avenue to Hilltop Drive in the City of Chula Vista, CA":
1.
2 .
3 .
Hammer Construction - Chula vista
Concrete Contractors Interstate - San Diego
Caves, Inc. - San Diego
$51,871.00
56,822.50
59,760.00
WHEREAS, the low bid by Hammer Construction is above the
engineer's estimate of $32,340.00 by $19,531.00 or 60.4 percent
with all three bids received being in the same general ballpark;
and
WHEREAS, staff has also evaluated the bid item by item
because of the difference between the low bid and the engineer's
estimate and the majority of the difference is in the removal and
disposal of existing improvements and the retaining wall; and
WHEREAS, all of the bid prices are fairly consistent in
all three bids and support the reasonableness of the low bidders
proposal, therefore, staff does not believe rebidding the project
would necessarily result in lower bid prices and recommends
awarding the contract to the lowest responsible bidder who has
assured the City that they are a licensed contractor who can
produce an acceptable performance bond.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city Council does
hereby accept the three bids and award the contract for sidewalk
installation on the south side of "E" Street from Corte Maria
Avenue to Hilltop Drive to Hammer Construction in the amount of
$51,871.00.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of
Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said
contract for and on behalf of the City of Chula vista.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the city Council does hereby
appropriate $22,520 from the unappropriated balance of Fund 253 -
Transportation Partnership Fund to Sidewalk Safety Program - STL-
205.
1
~-7
Presented by
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
F:\home\attomey\sidewalk
f~ '(
Approved as to form by
"u ~
\lM.J-,- .
D. Richard Ru
City Attorney
2
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item~
Meeting Date ('f)!08m
SUBMITTED BY:
Report: Proposed Mission Statement Element for Three Year Strategic Plan
Director of Parks and Recreatior4v
'\
City Manager--JG v.~\ ;~~~
'.
(4/5ths Vote: Yes _ No X)
Referral No. 2603
ITEM TITLE:
REVIEWED BY:
At the regular City Council meeting of May 5, 1992, the City Council discussed the Department's
Draft Strategic Plan. The Council directed staff to revise the Plan to include an additional element
regarding quality program design. The revision was to include recommended actions and descriptions.
An example that the Council suggested was: interagency linkages, such as the after-school programs
(including interaction with the school district). This report recommends a Strategic Plan Mission
Statement and an additional strategy for inclusion in the Plan.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Council adopt the Strategic Plan Mission Statement and
approve the additional strategy for inclusion in the Plan.
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: At the Parks and Recreation Commission
meeting of August 20, 1992, the Commission unanimously approved the addition of a Mission
Statement and Strategy #11 to the Department's Three Year Strategic Plan.
BACKGROUND: As part of the Department's long range planning efforts, a Three Year Strategic
Plan was prepared to guide the Department's future and the community's parks and recreation
services. The Strategic Plan was developed by staff in October, 1991. The Department staff
embarked on a program that defined past accomplishments and areas of concern, existing conditions
and future trends. The outcome of this effort is a Department Strategic Plan. This Plan will
establish a long range parks and recreation vision for the future.
In formulating this Plan, employees were selected from all work units to attend a two-day planning
session. Obviously, not everyone had the opportunity to attend the retreat. However, to maximize
employee input, a series of post retreat focus groups were conducted to include everyone in this
planning process. The employees received information on the various external influences and internal
influences that were affecting the Department in some way. For example, discussion material
included the strategies that were identified by Chula Vista 2000 and Chula Vista 21, the City
Council's major projects for the Department, the Department's goals and objectives, census data and
certain projects identified by the City Manager.
Employees were divided into groups to analyze the various issues. The information was then
compiled, and formatted into a three year work plan. The more significant projects (three years or
longer) were placed on a list and identified as important but not readily achievable within the three
[spmstate]
1
q-\
Item 'i
Meeting Date CYJf08m
year time frame. Of special significance was the inclusion in the Plan of the existing planning efforts
in the area of cultural arts and child care.
The addition of a Mission Statement and Strategy #11 also underwent a similar review process. In
this instance, the employees via the Department's Quality of Work Life (QWL) Committee reviewed
and supported these new elements. In addition, the Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed and
approved the proposed Mission Statement and the addendum of Strategy #11.
Following the above described steps, a draft Plan was distributed to all Departments for critique, and
Parks and Recreation received favorable comments. In preparing the Department's budget request
for FY 92/93, the Strategic Plan was used as an outline. The Department believes the Strategic Plan
is a workable and useful tool and staff looks forward to working internally and the other City
Departments and affected agencies to effect the implementation of the Plan. It is the Department's
intent to review the Plan periodically to analyze for modifications to reflect shifting interests in the
Plan's subject areas.
DISCUSSION: As a result of Council's discussions at its May 5, 1992 meeting, the Department
offers the following as a suggested Strategic Plan Mission Statement:
To provide safe, accessible and quality parks and recreation programs
that are designed to meet the needs of Chula Vista residents.
In order to facilitate the intent of the Mission Statement, the following Strategy is recommended for
addition to the Three Year Strategic Plan:
STRAlEGY #11:
OFFER ACCESSIBLE AND QUALITY PARKS AND RECREATION SERVICES
THAT ARE RESPONSIVE TO COMMUNITY INlEREST AND NEEDS.
Issue Addressed:
Programs are accessible and responsive to community need.
Recommended Actions:
1. Continue on-going efforts to share resources with the City's school districts. This shall
include offering diverse after-school playground services; joint-use agreements for land and
facilities; and collaborative programming efforts (1992 - 1994).
2. Continue on-going efforts to determine user satisfaction of programs through user surveys,
evaluations, and field observation reports (1992 - 1994).
[spm.tate] 2
C\-;L
Item --L
Meeting Date 09J1l8192
3. Attempt to gauge community needs of non-users through a community survey. This
community survey shall be a component of the Parks Implementation Plan (1993).
4. Continue on-going efforts to meet with community groups, service clubs, business
organizations, schools, and non-profit agencies to gather input and suggestions on City parks
and recreation programs (1992 - 1994).
5. Continue on-going efforts to design parks and recreation programs that are of high quality,
meet the special needs of the disabled person, and are affordable to the community (1992 -
1994).
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
Attachment:
Three Year Strategic Plan
(spmstate]
3
~-3> /9-1/
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
STRATEGIC PLAN
STRATEGY #1:
II
INCREASE FACILITIES
II
Issues Addressed:
City-wide shortage of facilities
Recommended Actions:
1. Establish Joint Use Agreements (1992)
A. School District
B. Southwestern College
C. Olympic Training Center (1993)
D. Investigate shared CIP's with above (1993)
2. Develop new park benefit fees through assessitlg commercialJindustrial development and
development impact fees (1992)
3. Pursue developing temporary structures in parks and recreation deficient areas (1993)
4. Upgrade facilities through funding by (1993-1994): ContributionslDonations
STRATEGY #2:
II ESTABliSH A PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE POLICY AND SCHEDULE II
Issues Addressed:
1.
2.
3.
Cost effective
Safety,1iability
Minimize major CIP's - extend facility lifetime
4.
5.
Improve appearance
Enhance public image
Recommended Actions:
1. Inventory/survey existing conditions (departmental tearns) (1992)
2. Develop park and facility standards for new/existing facilities (uniform specifications) (1993-1994)
3. Interdepartmental coordination (1992)
4. Consider creative financing to help off-set required preventative maintenance costs (percent of
revenues collected for recreational activities, to be earmarked for facility repairs) (1993-1994)
1
q~5
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
STRATEGIC PLAN
STRATEGY #3:
~ TO ASSESS & IMPLEMENT BUSINESS PROCEDURFS FOR THE DEPARTMENT II
Issues Addressed:
Computerization of the department through a network for all recreation centers, pools and park
supervisory staff. Improved operation for:
1. Scheduling - buildings, staff, parks, fields & programs
2. Water management
3. Inventory - equipment/supplies
4. Maintenance schedules - parks - buildings
Recommended Actions:
Priority #1:
Develop a phasing plan for acquisition of computer equipment and software
~
needs assessment (1992)
revenue generation (1993)
purchase/staff training (1994)
Priority #2:
Develop self-sustaining programs through formation of Community Center Advisory
Groups. Advisory groups would consider (1992-1993):
non-resident fees
program surcharge
% rental fees back to department
Priority #3:
Enhance customer service through staff training and business-like atmosphere in center
offices
establish customer service training for staff (1992)
recruit and train volunteers to staff center offices during the time the paid staff
not available (1992-1993)
2
q.~
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
STRATEGIC PLAN
STRATEGY #4:
FORMUlATE AN ACTION PLAN TO PROVIDE A SAFE ENVIRONMENT
IN THE PARK SYSTEM
Issues Addressed:
1.
2.
3.
4.
Vandalism
Equipment
Facilities
Field maintenance
5.
6.
7.
8.
Security - gates/alarm system
Homeless
Increase park patrol
Landscape maintenance
Rea>mmended Actions:
Priority #1: Establish a procedure with police department to monitor homeless in parks (1992)
Priority #2: Establish an "Adopt-A-Park" program through Neighborhood Watch. Neighbors to
receive phone numbers of contact persons-(1992-1993)
Priority #3: Establish Park Ranger training to a level that would give them "citing authority"
(1993)
Priority #4: Implement alarm system for park facilities (1994)
STRATEGY #5:
Plan A:
WORKLOAD EVALUATION
Assess present workloads and develop plan to share with other departments the
"opportunity" to be involved n Commissions and city-wide events; or
Establish a new Community Services Division to coordinate cultural arts,
child/adult care, special events, public relations and brochure
Plan B:
Issues Addressed:
Commissions
City-wide special events
Rea>mmended Actions:
Priority #1 for Plan A:
Evaluate (at administration level) work distribution brought on by
addition of new Commissions and city-wide special events
Priority #1 for Plan B:
Within one year (1992), establish a Community Services Division
Phase in staffing within 2 years (1993-1994)
3
q-l
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
STRATEGIC PLAN
STRATEGY #6:
II
ESTABUSH AN EFFICIENT WATER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM TO
REDUCE WATER USAGE
II
Issues Addressed:
1. Water costs
2. Water availability
3. Water sources
4. Facility/grounds maintenanCe
5. Purveyor constraints
Recommended Actions:
1. Adopt goals stated in Parks and Recreation 1991 Department Goals on water conservation
(1992)
..
2. Create Water Manager position (1993)
3. Investigate alternatives (1993-1994):
a. Reclaimed
b. De-salinization
c. Wells
STRATEGY #7:
CREATE "SERVICE CENTERS" TO INCREASE STAFF
EFFICIENCY AND MAXIMIZE RESOURCES
Issues Addressed:
1. Customer Service
2. Ownership
3. Effective supervision
4. Budget tracking/constraints
Recommended Actions:
1. Identify service areas (1992)
2. Evaluate supervisor/employee ratio (1992)
3. Re-format budget (1992)
4. Present to the City Manager, the One-stop shop concept (1993)
5. Institute computerized phasing program (1994)
4
'\~<t
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
STRATEGIC PLAN
STRATEGY #8:
II
CREATE POUCY TO INCREASE REVENUE
ENHANCING SERVICES
II
Issues Addressed:
1. Outside resources continue to decrease
2. Service expectations continue to increase
3. Staffing levels remain constant
Recommended Actions: (all in 1992)
1. Investigate creative financing for parks and recreation programs
2. Train staff through NRP A's Revenue Management School
3. Increase partnerships with service organizations
4. Investigate and report to the City Manager potential areas to contract services
5. Develop a volunteer program in P & R
6. Create a Revenue Enhancement Committee with an end product of a Revenue Generation
Plan (1992)
STRATEGY #9:
DEVELOP PARK AND RECREATION MASTER PIAN
Recommended Actions:
Priority #1:
Research and write a proposal for City Manager's review and support for the need of
a Park Master Plan (1992)
Priority #2:
Describe the benefits of city-wide Park Master Plan. These can include:
A Meeting needs of demographic changes
B. Development of standards for passive/active parks
Priority #3:
Identify potential funding sources/outside of General Fund
Priority #4:
Hire consultant (1993)
Priority #5:
Implementation of Master Plan (1994)
5
Q'4
PARKS AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
STRATEGIC PLAN
STRATEGY #10:
~
DEVELOPMENT OF "FRIENDS OF TIIE PARK" GROUP FOR TIIE
PARK AND RECREATION DEPARTMENT
Recommended Actions:
Priority #1: Develop concept of non-profit corporation for the purpose of providing support for
department programs
Priority #2: The City Manager/Council support (1992)
A. Identify benefits to City
B. Provide funding for more services
C. Promote department
D. Defer equipments needs
Priority #3: Implementation of non-profit (1993)
~
A. Bylaws
B. Membership criteria/training
C. Action plan
Priority #4: Determination of department needs and priority i.e. Adopt Tree/MemoriaVgifts
catalogue, etc.
6
C\-ID
II
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item /0
ITEM TITLE:
Meeting Date 9/08/92
Public Hearing - Amending the FY 1992-93 Budget to Account for
Revenue Reductions from the State of California
ResolutionJb~O~- Approving the amended budget for FY 1992-93
SUBMITTED BY: City Manage~- (4/5ths Vote: Yes-X No____>
v
On June 16, 1992, the City Council adopted the 1992-93 operating budget with the
understanding that the budget would be revisited after the State adopted its
budget and the impact of the State revenue cuts on the City were known. At the
same time, a h iri ng freeze was imposed (except for certa i n pub 1 ic safety
positions) in order to position the City to address any severe State revenue
take-aways, wh i ch fortunate ly di d not occur. Later, at the August 25, 1992
meeting, the City Council requested a report on various alternative strategies
for dealing with various levels of revenue reductions as a result of the State
budget crisis in order to prepare for the eventual finalization of the State
budget. Shortly thereafter, on September 1, 1992, the State budget was adopted
and the major impacts of this budget on the City are now known. As a result, a
proposal for amending the City's 1992-93 budget is hereby offered in order that
the City can get on with its business of providing service to the public and
uncertainty can be removed from the minds of the general public as well as City
employees of where the City is headed regarding the City budget, service levels,
etc.
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt revised budget and eliminate hiring freeze.
(While it is recommended that the budget be adopted and the
hiring freeze be eliminated, the Council may wish to have a
workshop to discuss these proposals in more detail. My only
recommendation would be to do this sooner than later so that
the ability to achieve the cuts outlined in the report can be
accomplished at the levels indicated and also to eliminate the
uncertainty that is throughout the organization as to exactly
where the City is headed in terms of its budget.)
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: N.A.
BACKGROUND:
The citizens of this State have witnessed the most prolonged and protracted
discussion of a State budget in the recent history of California. The State went
21/2 months beyond the legislatively imposed deadline to adopt the State budget,
and a little over two months into the current fiscal year before adopting that
budget. Because of a major deficit in the State budget, the State has taken
/D -,
Meeting Date ~
Page ...d.-. IteiiI7D
action to reduce revenues for health and welfare programs, and to local
government, including cities, counties and special districts.
Chula Vista's General Fund revenue per capita is among the lowest in the County
compared to cities over 50,000 population. Basically we are not a wealthy city.
As a result, our operations have been relatively "lean". The number of employees
per capita is the second lowest in the County for cities over 50,000 population.
As a result of long-term fiscal prudence, Chula Vista has developed over
$9,250,000 reserves against a general operating budget of $52,700,000, or
reserves of 17.5%. Even with long-term prudent business operations on the part
of the City, the State budget cuts mean, in my view, additional belt tightening,
as well as additional efforts to realistically increase City revenues. The
proposed revised 1992-93 budget addressed both of these points in order that the
service levels provided to the general public are not diminished.
Assumptions/Goals
In preparing the proposed revised 1992-93 budget, four basic assumptions or goals
were utilized. These assumptions or goals were:
1. To ma inta in and not decrease existina service leve ls to the aenera 1
oublic. We observe in other cities that layoffs are occurring, service
levels are being reduced, library hours are being cut, afterschool
recreation programs are being eliminated, etc. In Chula Vista, one of our
primary goals has been to maintain service levels, even in face of
economic adversity. That continues to be a goal for the 1992-93 budget.
2. General Fund reserves are not beina used to balance the budaet. The City
Council, as a matter of policy, has consistently resisted the use of
reserves to help balance the City's budget and this position is for a good
reason. It is obvious that even with 17.5% reserves, if you start
spending your reserves for general operations, you eventually run out of
your reserves or savings, which then will not be available for support of
such services. In addition, the interest earned from the reserves is a
revenue stream or income source to the City, which then would be lost if
the reserves are completely spent. This is not to say that reserves could
not be used, say to the tune of $1-2 million for a particularly difficult
situation in order to maintain service levels. However, that is not being
proposed in the budget being presented to you. The assumption, as stated
before, is that reserves will not be used for balancing the 1992-93 budget
as proposed to be revised.
3. The orooosed budaet is desianed to meet the City's Memoranda of
Understandina (MOUl commitments. As you know, the City is in the last
year of multi-year agreements with associations representing police, fire,
general employees and engineers. The budget, as adopted by the Council
earlier, and as now proposed to be revised, will meet those commitments by
the City. This is in contrast to the City of San Diego which is
!0-2.
Meeting Date 9/08/92
Page ...:3..... Item / D
discussing with union leadership in that city the possible take-back of
salary increases this year in order to avoid layoffs. The Chula Vista
budget as proposed does not contemp 1 ate back ing away from these MOU
commitments. Th i s does not necessar i ly imp ly that the City incoming
fiscal years will be in a very good position to negotiate much, if
anything, by way of additional salary increases, but, at least for the
current f i sca 1 year, these commitments can and shou 1 d be met. Thi s is
also not to say that the evaluation and discussion which is underway
regarding a possible City-wide policy of employees in certain selected
situations being able to reduce their work week for a proportionate
reduct ion in sa 1 ary, wi 11 not be further exp lored. It wi 11 be. The
budget as ~roposed, however, does not assume any salary savings from this
initiative, although as a practical matter, there will be some savings.
The extent of the program, and therefore the savings, is just not known at
this point!.
4. The fJrofJosed budaet a Iso does not anticifJate anv lavoff of Citv emfJlovees.
Just as the proposed budget would enable the City to meet its MOU
commitments and at the same time provide the same service levels, it is
not contemplated that layoff of City employees will be required. Through
what is proposed in th i s budget, the budget wi 11 be ba lanced, and no
layoffs would be contemplated in the current fiscal year. As a result of
this, it would appear as well that there would no longer be a need for the
hiring freeze presently in place, and it is recommended, along with the
adoption of the revised 1992-93 budget, to eliminate the hiring freeze as
well.
The proposed budget does address these four assumptions and goals, but it should
a 1 so be ment ioned that the proposa 1 is des igned to set the stage for fi sca 1
stability for the City in 1993-94. As you examine what is being proposed in this
budget, it could readily be determined that the roughly $950,000 in revenue cuts
to the City's General Fund from the State budget action could be matched by
additional revenues the City has developed since the 1992-93 budget was initially
adopted. It is proposed, in addition, however, that certain expenditure cuts
also be adopted in order to help set the stage for 1993-94. So, what is proposed
for 1992-93 will more than balance the budget, and is desi9ned to protect the
City's ability to maintain its service levels in 1993-94. This is because I am
not conv i nced that the State's fi sca 1 ills have been reso 1 ved by the recent
adopt ion of the State budget, nor that the City's own strugg les with the
recession are over, and the fact that certain windfall revenue which supported
the 1992-93 budget must be replaced in 1993-94 in order to maintain current
service levels.
What Imoact Will the State Budaet Have on City Revenues?
!Except as specifically identified in the City Attorney's Office and the
Management & Information Services Department.
ID-3
Meeting Date 9/08b92
Page ~ Item /
The City's general operating budget has been affected by the State budget due to
a 9% across-the-board cut in City property taxes. In addition, all revenue from
cigarette tax is being eliminated, and a small reduction in the trailer coach fee
portion of motor vehicle in-lieu tax has also been taken from the City. This
permanent reduction in revenue as it applies to the City of Chula Vista is as
fo llows:
Property Tax Loss
Cigarette Tax
Trailer Coach (VLF)
TOTAL
$780,000
$120,000
$ 50,000
$950,000
This represents the total amount to be reduced from the City's General Fund.
Proposed Budget Revisions
In order to counterbalance this revenue loss, the current budget as presently
adopted projects a surp 1 us of revenues over expend itures of $434,963. In
addition, the action last week by the Port Commission to provide revenue to the
City for pol ice and fire services to the non-taxpaying portions of the tidelands,
will provide the City this fiscal year with $450,000 more than was contemplated
in the current budget. This basically provides revenue to the City totalli9g
over $900,000 for this and the previous two fiscal years for these services.
Also, an additional $90,000 in revenue from the Police Department is expected,
which was not budgeted to date for 1992-93. This increased revenue results
primarily from the cardroom table tax increases, a revised animal control
contract with Imperi a 1 Beach, and an increase in revenue pursuant to fire
dispatch services provided for the Bonita-Sunnyside Fire Protection District.
The animal control and fire dispatch contracts will be forwarded to the City
Council for approval within the next 30 days.
While the revenues just outlined nearly offset the revenue loss from the State
budget, it is still recommended that additional expenditure reductions occur in
the budget. This is in part because at least a $300,000 reserve should be set
aside for implementing the results of the City's MOU's and other salary
adjustments that may be necessary. For example, the Police and Fire MOU's each
provide that there is a possible salary adjustment based on the results of a
salary survey which will occur during the course of the fiscal year. For
examp le, with the Po 1 ice Off icers Assoc i at ion, the sa 1 ary survey occurs in
September and the agreement provides that they will be placed at 2% above the
average pay for police officers among those cities that are surveyed. For the
Firefighters, the survey will be accomplished in November, and any adjustment
necessary to be brought up to the average of firefighters in the survey, to be
2$450,000 was included as projected revenue from this source in 1992-93, so
the $900,000 to be received is $450,000 more than the current budget is based on.
/D -If
Meeting Date 9/08/92
~
Page ~ Item /0
effective December 25, 1992, would need to be implemented. In addition, the
part-time hourly employees normally receive an adjustment similar to what CVEA
has received, and this has not been agreed to or provided for at this point and
needs to be considered. In addition, certain commitments to middle managers to
consider implementing a salary survey from FY 1991-92 was not addressed because
of the budget crisis which occurred last Spring, and such consideration has been
held over pending the results of that State budget crisis and needs to be
addressed as well. It is recommended for these reasons that at least a reserve
of $300,000 be established to put the City in a position to address these
matters.
In addition, the expenditure cuts are recommended in order to assist the City in
its transition to balance its budget in 1993-94, which is probably in the current
perspective going to be a more difficult budget balancing act than was the
current fiscal year. Therefore, it is proposed that expenditure reductions of
$1,000,000, or approximately 2% of the City's operating budget, be implemented.
These reductions are contained in Attachment A and impact all departments. It
should be kept in mind that these cuts are reductions in expenses that require
general operating revenue to support. They do not necessarily reflect the cuts
in expenditures that are supported by special revenues, since a reduction in
those expenditures only results in a reduction in counterbalancing revenues, with
the result that there is no net gain to the General Fund. So, the focus of these
cuts is a reduction in expenditures that will be "real" and will work toward the
goal of reducing expenditures without impacting service levels.
The proposed budget reductions are as a result of a Summer long review of
possible reductions because of the State budget crisis between the Budget Manager
and her staff and the operating departments. Basically, there were six levels
of possible budget cuts, all the way from operating account cuts (minimal or no
impact) to higher level cuts which would eliminate positions, reduce programs,
and have a noticeable impact on service levels to the public.
Even though what is recommended is designed to have minor or no impact on service
levels and is focusing basically on operating accounts such as reducing funds for
overtime, computer training, travel, computer and office equipment maintenance,
professional memberships, printing, vacation relief, office supplies, other
commodities accounts, professional services, postage, books, etc., there are at
least four positions that would be impacted by this proposal, as well as minor
service level impacts.
Among the positions recommended to be changed, one would be to eliminate one
Building & Housing Inspector position when that position becomes vacant in the
middle of the year due to retirement. With the building slowdown, it is not
expected that this position will be needed. This will result in a savings of
$27,883.
It is also projected that the Systems & Program Manager position in Information
Systems be frozen and be replaced with a part-time position. This is a currently
vacant position which will be evaluated during this fiscal year to determine the
(0 -5
Meeting Date 9/08/92
Page ~ Item / II
most appropriate level of staffing in this department. This one-year freeze will
result in a savings of $49,000.
Another position affected would be a .50 temporary Senior Planner recommended by
the Planning Department. This is supported by General Fund and not by
development fees. It is recommended that the reduced available workload of this
Planner be absorbed throughout the department at a savings of $34,105.
A final position that is recommended to be eliminated is a Tree Trimmer vacancy
on the City tree crew. It is viewed that, based on the current workload as well
as the support the City receives through the Work Fare program, by not filling
this position, there should be no impact on service levels being provided. It
is not recommended, however,that the position be eliminated, but just frozen
while we have the support of the Work Fare program. If in the future it is not
available to the City, then it would make sense to relook at the position to see
if it needs to be filled.
In spec if i c budgets, there are no reduct ions recommended in either the City
Counc i1 budget nor the Board and Commi ss ion budgets, except that in Non-
Departmental it is recommended that the City Council contingency fund be reduced
from $30,000 to $15,000. The City Council may want to restore that cut, all or
in part, or may want to consider giving direction to look at individual accounts
in either the City Council and/or Board/Commission budgets.
L ibrarv. Parks and Recreation. Also, there are some expenditure reductions which
could have some minor or minimal service level impacts. In the Library, for
example, it is recommended that $20,769 be reduced for lending and reference
materials, which will reduce the number of new lending materials in the current
fiscal year by 1,138 items. Also, the cuts in postage and printing would
decrease the number of overdue notices from three to two.
In Parks & Recreation, there would be a reduction in the number of brochures
issued announcing various programs and classes from four to three per year.
Actually, the normal service level for most of the decade of the 80's was three
recreation class brochures per year, and it was just recently upgraded to four
over the past two or three years. This would recommend going back to the former
standard, saving $3,625. Also, staff is recommending that the Lauderbach and
Loma Verde Centers be closed two hours earlier on Fridays (5:00 p.m. rather than
7:00 p.m., at a savings of $1,750). In terms of impact, the Parks & Recreation
Director indicates that no programming would be affected and that the attendance
is very low at the end of the week so the impact is viewed as minor or minimal.
Fire and Police. In the Fire Department, in addition to reduction in printing
and binding, postage, travel, training, computer maintenance, etc., and the
number of other accounts cut in this and other departments throughout the City,
there is a substantial reduction in expenditures for this year due to the delay
in the opening of Fire Station No.6. Even though staff was hired for Station
No.6, which is not open and probably will not be open until January I, 1993,
there have been other vacancies that have not been filled because of the Fire
10- ft:,
Meeting Date 9/08/92
Page 4- Item 10
Station No.6 staff which is currently available. As a result, a major savings
results from the delay in the opening of Fire Station No.6, which also enables
the department to reduce its overtime budget because of this other additional
staff.
In the Police Department, there are a number of line items that are reduced
related to computer maintenance, conferences, contractual services, reducing the
number of terminals needed to access the ARJIS system, and there are other steps
at belt tightening within the department. In terms of some of those smaller
steps, for example, there is a reduction of $5,000 for ammunition based on prior
year usage, a reduction of $400 in lab supplies by switching from Polaroid to
35mm cameras where the instant photos from a Po 1 aroi d are not necessary,
continuing the physical fitness program but el iminating the exercise physiologist
($10,000) and eliminating the aerobics program, which only has six or eight
people using it currently ($3,560), and perhaps folding it into one of the Parks
and Recreation Department programs.
There are two additional larger reductions in the department. One is to reduce
the fleet by eight vehicles, saving $75,000 in the vehicle replacement program.
This is based upon an analysis that was done by Police Administration which
indicated that in their view the fleet is too large. Staff advises that this
reduction would have been proposed with or without the State budget crisis. It
is something that makes good sense and would have been proposed to the City
Council in any event.
Finally, it is recommended that Police overtime be reduced by $160,000. It is
felt that by improved management of personnel in Police operations that this
amount of overtime can be eliminated. The department still will have $643,890
in overtime left to meet the department's obvious overtime needs.
The following chart demonstrates how the proposed budget revision addresses both
the State revenue cuts because of the State budget crisis and sets the stage for
balancing the 1993-94 budget.
SUBTOTAL
$ 950,033
$ 434,963
$ 450,000
$ 90.000
$1,924,996
$ (950,000)
1300.000)
$ 674,996
Projected Revenue Gains/Expenditure Cuts
Projected Surplus in Current Year
Additional Unanticipated Revenue from Port
Unanticipated Revenue from Cardroom Operations
Less Revenue Loss Due to State Budget
Less Contingency for Salaries
Projected Carryover from 1992-93 to 1993-94
In addition to this $674,996 there are other revenue sources which can also help
the City prepare for 1993-94. One is the money received from Kaiser as part of
(D-7
Meeting Date 9/08/92
Page 2- Item /U
the recently approved Development Agreement totalling $1.2 million. With
interest earned between now and the latter part of next fiscal year, this may
grow to $1.3 million. Even though this is a one-time windfall, all or part of
this revenue would be available to help support the 1993-94 budget if necessary.
In addition, the recently adopted State budget included legislation that would
enable the City to share part of the Port's reserves to make up for any property
tax funds which were lost as a result of the State budget action. Since the City
is projected to lose $780,000 in property taxes, the City would be able under
this law to replace that amount as revenue from Port reserves. This revenue is
not included in the proposed 1992-93 budget revisions since this Act may be
challenged legally, and even if it is not, or is not challenged successfully,
there is a process which must be followed in which whatever distribution formula
which is used for these funds must be subject to a majority vote of each City
Council of the five-member Port cities, as well as a majority vote of the San
Diego Unified Port District Commission. A more complete description of this
legislation, and its possible favorable impact on the revenue projected to be
lost by the Redeve lopment Agency, is i nc luded as Attachment B. It shou 1 d be
po i nted out further that thi s is over and above the add i t iona 1 $450,000 projected
in the 1992-93 budget from the Port, which was approved by the Port Commission
last week.
In any case, the $674,996 savings projected in the revised 1992-93 budget, plus
the money from Kaiser, along with the possibility of additional Port revenue,
could produce anywhere from $2 to $2.8 million to the City as a cushion for 1993-
94. Again, this is necessary because of continuing recessionary pressure, the
possibility the State may cut City revenues again next year, and the fact the
City receives one-time windfalls, such as the PERS credit of $1.3 million, which
is incorporated in this year's budget. In this latter instance, while there may
be some PERS credit in the coming fiscal year because traditionally there has
been some annual credit, the amount of the PERS credit experienced in the current
year is not expected to be repeated next year. It should also be pointed out
that this does not create a framework or a proposal for balancing the 1993-94
budget. It only sets the stage for creating such a framework. The City staff
will continue to work energetically in other ways to promote City revenues and
to look at possible ways in which expenditures can be cut. This would include
obviously the continued promotion of the City's economic development activities
and working on additional revenues, such as the landfill mitigation fees, a sales
tax audit, and the numerous revenue areas the City Council authorized staff to
pursue as part of the City's revenue program. (Please see Attachment C).
So, in summary, the proposed revised 1992-93 budget recommends a combination of
expenditure cuts as well as taking advantage of revenues recently developed which
are over and above the expenditure plan already approved by the City Council.
At the same time, this would not require any layoffs, would maintain current
service levels to the general public, will meet the City's Memoranda of
Understand ing commitments to the emp loyee assoc i at ions without us ing City Genera 1
Fund reserves. It also sets forth a plan which would set the stage for balancing
the 1993-94 budget in order to again the meet the goal of maintaining current
service level s.
IO'f'
Meeting Date 9/08/92
Page ..:J- Item I D
As a side note, there will be a need also to evaluate and look at the overall
budget for Redevelopment as a result of the revenue loss to the Agency from the
State. Basically, what occurred in the State budget is that 16% of the tax
increment for 1991, the base year, was used to determine the payment which will
be made from Redevelopment to schools for 1992-93 only. In making that payment,
the Agency can use up to 50% of its low and moderate income housing set-aside
funds. If any set-aside funds are used, that will need to be repaid by the year
2003. This raises the issue, obviously, of how to balance the Redevelopment
Agency budget, although there may be a possibility that Port surplus revenue may
be utilized for that purpose and whether or not any low and moderate income
housing set-aside funds should be used in order to counteract that revenue loss
to the Agency. After information is developed on the Port reserve revenues vis-
a-vis redevelopment, a recommendation on the Redevelopment Agency budget will be
presented to you.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The approva 1 of the recommended budget reduct ions wi 11 adopt a rev i sed budget for
FY 1992-93 of $51,745,395.
JDG:mab
cuts
!tJ - 9 / /tJ./D
DEPT
ISSUE
AMOUNT COMMENT
Admin CONSULTANT FUNDS $10,000 Eliminates cosultant funding
Admin TRAVEL $7,135 Red uces travel expense
Admin SPECIAL EVENT VIDEOS $3,000 Red uces the level of video, minimal effect
Admin V ACA TlON RELIEF $2,800 Existing staff to cover for vacations
Admin CITYLINK BASE HOURS $1,370 From 60 TO 36 hours, minimal effect on service
Admin COMPUTER MAINTENANCE $1,325 Reduces by half
"- Admin TRAINING $1,025 Reduces training available
C>
I Admin SOFTWARE CONTINGENCY $950 Eliminates contingency
......
--..... Admin PRINTING $500 Minimal Impact anticipated
Admin Sub-total $28,105
Attorney
Attorney
Attorney
SALARY a. BENEFIT SAVINGS
TRAVEL
COMPUTER EQUIP MAl NT
Attorney Sub-total
$18,020 Voluntary 20% work week reduction, partial year
$500 Reduce miscellaneous travel
$720 50% red uction
$19,240
Page 1
ATTACHMENT A
B&H PROfESSIONAL SERVICES $2,000 Small percentage cut, minimal Impact on operations
B&H PRINTING $980 Small percentage cut, minimal Impact on operations
B&H OVERTIME $500 Small percentage cut, minimal impact on operations
B& H BOOKS & PUBLICATIONS $250 Small percentage cut, minimal Impact on operations
B& H TRAVEL $1,530 S mall percentage cut, minimal impact on operations
B&H MATERIALS TO MAINT EQUIP $2,000 Small percentage cut, minimal impact on operations
B&H PHOTO & BLUEPRINT $150 Small percentage cut, minimal impact on operations
B&H TRAINING $130 Small percentage cut, minimal impact on operations
B& H POSTAGE $300 Small percentage cut, minimal impact on operations
B& H BLDG/HOUS INSPECTOR II $27,883 Cut 6 month of position len vacant aner retirement
......... Build ing & Hous Sub-total $35,723
~
1
"-
N
Clerk DIffERENTIAL $1,500 Eliminate Clerk's education differential
Clerk PHOTO & BLUEPRINT $1,000 Account red uction
Clerk TRAINING $550 Account red uctlon
Clerk TRAVEL $1,075 Account red uction
Clerk COMP EQUIP MAINT $540 50% reduction
Clerk PROMOTIONS $500 Account reduction
Clerk OTHER COMMODITIES $200 Account reduction
Clerk ADVERTISING $500 Account red uction
Clerk Sub-total $5,865
Com Dev
PROf SERVICES
$16,000 CRA Needs Assessment paid in prior year
Page 2
Com Dey MEMBERSHIP $1,742
Com Dey ADVERTISING $1,650
Com Dey PRINTING 8r BINDING $990
Com Dey SERVICE ON OFFICE EQUIP $857
Com Dey OFFICE EQUIPMENT $549
Com Dey COMPUTER EQUIP MAINT $500
Com Dey POSTAGE $495
Com Dev OFFICE SUPPLIES $440
Com DeY PHOTO 8r BLUEPRNT $250
Com Dey PROMOTIONS $242
Com Dey TELEPHONE $236
"'- Com Dev OTHER COMMODITIES $200
~ Com Dey TRAINING $117
I Comm Dev Sub-total $24,268
.....
lJ.I
Flna nee HOURLY WAGES $5,810
Finance SALARY SAVINGS $5,690 Savings by filling permanent position with temp help
Finance PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $3,370
Finance SALARY SAVINGS $3,300 Aeetg Asst position on leave wlo pay
Finance TRAVEL $3,190 Reduce 2/3 of travel budget
Finance SICK LEAVE PAY-IN-L1EU $2,280
Fina nee PRINTING $1,800
Fina nee COMPUTER MAl NT $1,010
Page 3
Flna nee OTHER COMMODITIES $500
Flna nee OFFICE SUPPLIES $400
Finance Sub-total $27,350
Fire OVERTIME $105,420 Reduced need for overtime with Sin 6 staff, prevention callout
Fire SALARY & BENEFITS $75,979 Savings from Sin 6, due 10 open Jan, less budgeled salary savings
Fire WEARING APPAREL $7,000
Fire OTHER COMMODITIES $6,000
Fire OTHER CONTR SERV $4,000
Fire TRAINING $3,730
Fire TRAVEL $3,595
"- Fire MATERIALS TO MAINT EQUIP $1 ,490
()
, Fire JANITORIAL SUPPLIES $1,000
"- $1,000
~ Fire STATION MAl NT
Fire PUBLICATIONS $910
Fire MAl NT OF EQUIP $680
Fire PRINTING & BINDING $550
Fire OFFICE EQUIP MAINT $550
Fire OFFICE SUPPLIES $440
Fire COMPUTER EQUIP MAl NT $415
Fire LAUNDRY $300
Fire MEMBERSHIPS $300
Fire LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES $230
Fire POSTAGE $100
Fire SMALL TOOLS $100
Fire Sub-Iotal $213,789
Page 4
Library BOOKS $15,428
Library OTHER CONTR SERV $8,850
Library PRINTING $7,720
Library REFERENCE MATERIALS $5,341
Library POSTAGE $5,000
Library AV MATERIALS $4,854
Library TRAVEL $2,258
Library OTHER EQUIP MAl NT $2,150
Library OFFICE SUPPLIES $1,960
"- Library COMPUTER MAINTENANCE $1,700
~
\ Library TRAINING $1,430
~\ Library OTHER COMMODITIES $1,125
Library OVERTIME $830
Library PROFESSIONAL SERVICES $610
Library MEMBERSHIP AND DUES $550
Library PROMOTIONS $250
Library OFFICE EQUIP MAINT $246
Library SICK LEAVE PAY-IN-L1EU $206
Library PHOTO & BLUEPRNT $151
Library TRANSPORTATION $90
Library Sub-total $60,749
MIS
MIS
FREEZE SYS AND PROG MGR
SALARY SAVINGS
$49,000 Complete work wnh temp help
$15,077 Voluntary work week reduction
Page 5
MIS RENTAL & LEASES $10,000
MIS TRAVEL $4,500
MIS PRINTING $1,620
MIS OVERTIME $1,190
MIS PROF SERVICES $995
MIS HOURLY WAGES $557
MIS SERV MAINT OFFICE EQUIP $524
MIS SERV MAIN OTHER EQ $340
MIS OFFICE SUPPLIES $200
MIS COMPUTER MAINT $200
MIS BOOKS $170
MIS MEMBERSHIPS $105
"- MIS OTHER CONTR SERV $100
\:::.
I MIS TRANS ALLOW $30
~ Mgmt & Info Sys Sub-total $84,608
NIC TRAVEL $1,250
NIC PUBLIC CONCERT SERIES $500 Red uces from 4 conce rts to 2
NIC SALARY & BENEFITS $700 No Impact
NIC BOOKS $200
NIC CHEMICALS $200
NIC TRAINING $350 Red uces
NIC RENTALS $800 Eliminated tents for public concerts
NIC Sub-total $4,000
Page 6
Non-Dept
COUNCIL CONTINGENCY
$15,000 Reduces by half
Pa rks & Rec MAT TO MAIN STR & GDS $5,000 Defer purchase of some Irrlgalion supplies
Parks & Rec ADVERTISING $3,525 Brochure published 3 limes per year
Parks & Rec TRAVEL $3,410 Cuts 50% of travel
Parks & Rec HOURLY WAGES $2,641 Cuts Imern hours by 50%
pa rks & Rec LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES $2,000 Less than 20% cut in fertilization, reduce in wimer
Pa rks & Rec HOURLY WAGES $1,244 Vacation relief to be done whh existing staff
Pa rks & Rec LOMA VERDE FRIDAY PM $826 Close Center from 5-7 on fridays, low use lime
Pa rks & Rec LAUDERBACH FRIDAY PM $826 Close Center from 5-7 on fridays, low use lime
"- Parks & Rec COMPUTER MAINTENANCE $500 50% red ootlDn
\:) Parks & Rec OVERTIME - PARKS $500
\
.... Pa rks & Rec MEMBERSHIP $200 Minimal impact
~ Parks & Rec Sub-total $20,572
Personnel HOURLY WAGES $5,000 Reduce Imern hours
Personnel PARS for Intern $185
Personnel ADVERTISING $1,600
Personnel TRAINING $1,990
Personnel PRINC ANALYST TO SR $3,370 Pashion filled allDwer level
Personnel TRAVEL $2,924
Personnel PRINTING $800
Page 7
Personnel OFFICE SUPPLIES $737
Pe rsonne I BOOKS $350
Personnel TELEPHONE $390
Personnel MEMBERSHIP $40
Personnel COMPUTER MAINT $1,260
Personnel Sub-total $18,646
Planning Sub-total
$34,105
$3,853
$37,958
Planning
Planning
HOURLY WAGES
TRAVEL
.......
C>
I
....... Police OVERTIME $160,000
~ Police VEHICLE REPL $75,000 Reorg Ileet reduce 8 cars, do anyway
Police PHYSICAL FITNESS PROGRAM $10,000 Eliminate Exer Physiologist
Police CONTR SERVICE $8,400 Cut LETN Video Trng prog
Police ARJIS SERVICE USE $7,500 Reduce # 01 terminals/use low cost Input time
Police CONFID INFORM PAY $5,000 No impact due to prior year savings
Police AMMUNITION $5,000 Represents a 14% cut, minimal Impact
Police TRAVEL $4,900 50% cut dept wide
Police AEROBICS $3,560 Eliminate aerobic program
Police WEARING APPAREL $2,000 Deler Discretionary replacment
Police COMPUTER MAINTENANCE $1,740
Police LABORATORY SUPPLIES $400 Procedural change on use 01 film
Page 8
Police Sub-Iotal
$283,500
Pub Wks CUT 1 TREE TRIMMER $36,657 Position vacant, create minimal impact
Pub Wks CONSTR SPEC I $8,202 FILL CSII AT CSI LEVEL
Pub Wks TRAVEL $4,282
Pub Wks COMP EQUIP MAIN $4,076
Pub Wks TRAINING $3,140
Pub Wks TRAINING $3,140
Pub Wks TRAVEL $2,690
---- Pub Wks OTHER COMMODITIES $1,700
<;:)- Pub Wks PRINTING $1,500
\ Pub Wks OVERTIME $1,100
.......
--.5) Pub Wks GRAFFITI SUPPLIES/PRIVATE $1,000
.......... Pub Wks PROF SERVICES $1,000
~ Pub Wks HOURLY WAGES $803
Pub Wks SMALL TOOLS $400
,
~ Pub Wks OFFICE SUPPLIES $350
Pub Wks BOOKS $300
Pub Wks OFFICE EQ MAIN $200
Pub Wks SVC TO MAIN OTHER EQ $100
Pub Wks MEDICAL SUPPLIES $20
Public Works Sub-Iotal $70,660
~ ~.J03.3
Page 9
M
M
o
o
'"
0>
...
...J
<
....
o
....
jO').J)
-l
o
~
Q)
Ol
(\l
0..
ATTACHMENT B
During the debate on the new state budget, the Public Resources
Code was amended to permit port districts to transfer a portion of
their discretionary revenues to member cities. The total amount
transferred from the port may not exceed 25% of "the difference
between the (port's) total current assets....less total current
liabilities, as reported in the most current independently audited
annual financial statement of the port.... ". Based on the San
Diego Unified Port District's financial statement for FY 91 (its
most recent audited report), approximately $141,500,000 was
available in discretionary reserves. As such, 25% of these funds,
$35,375,000, would be potentially available to be transferred to
the member cities to offset the specific revenue losses authorized
by the legislation. These losses are discussed below.
The amount which anyone city can receive from the port is limited
by the legislation to "the amount of property tax revenue foregone
by the city". The most restrictive interpretation of this proviso
would limit reimbursements to the 9% reduction in city property tax
revenues instituted by the state. For Chula vista, this would
amount to a reimbursement of approximately $820,000. For
comparison, the City of San Diego would be eligible for transfers
up to approximately $12,000,000. There is a possibility, however,
that the reimbursement cap may also include funds lost to a City's
redevelopment agency. If so, this would add an additional $700,000
to the maximum amount transferable to Chula Vista, bringing the
City's total potential transfers to $1,520,000. (Again for
comparison, San Diego's total, including redevelopment agency
losses would approximate $16,000,000.) This issue is being
researched. In either instance, it appears that the combined
request of the five member cities would total less then the maximum
amount authorized ($35,375,000).
In order to obtain transfers from the port, a "fair and equitable
formula" for distribution must be established by the five member
cities and the port district and must be unanimously agreed to
"pursuant to a majority vote of each city council and a majority
vote of the San Diego Unified Port District commissioners". The
city of San Diego will be taking the lead in developing such an
agreement among the five cities.
Lastly, the authorization to transfer discretionary funds from the
port district to the member cities to offset property tax losses
would expire as of June 30, 1994. Thus, these revenues would
provide the member cities with a two year cushion in which to
adjust to the permanent revenue loss.
(0 <~.( / If) -}.'J.
FY'lla..,
RI"IM"!E~M
$1 Million & Above
$200,000 to $1 Million
$25,000 to $200,000
Under $25,000
Unknown
.I Landfill Mitigation .I Master Fee Schedule .I Improved Collection .I Automated Parking .I Parks & Recreation
"- Fee Update Techniques Tickets Revenue
()
I Enhancement
~ .I Salt Creek .I Loan Origination .I Fire High Hazard .I Medical Exam .I Property Owner
(p
Development Charge/Assessment Inspection Fee Reimbursements Maintenance
" Agreement District Parkways/Monolithic
~ Sidewalks
, .I Kaiser Development .I SDG&E Loan .I Ads for Televising .I Crime Analysis Fees .I Apply Utility Users
~ Agreement Origination Fee City Council Meetings Tax to Cable TV
IDA Bonds
.I Establish Central .I Utility Roll Legislation .I Sell City Facilities
Purchasing Entity for Lease Back
New Construction
.I Port Negotiation of .I Exterior Bus Ads .I Charging
Payment for Public Redevelopment I
Safety Services Agency for
Processing Fees
.I Bench Ads .I Used Car Sales Tax
.I Planning n
Reapplication Fee
c:\ WP51\DA WN\8UOGET. CHT
RESOLUTION NO. /10 't () Y
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE FY 1992-93 BUDGET TO
ACCOUNT FOR REVENUE REDUCTIONS FROM THE STATE
OF CALIFORNIA
WHEREAS, on June 16, 1992, the City Council adopted the
1992-93 operating budget with the understanding that the budget
would be revisited after the State adopted its budget and the
impact of the State revenue cuts on the city were known; and
WHEREAS, on September 1, 1992, the State budget was
adopted and the major impacts of this budget on the city are now
known; and
WHEREAS, as a result, the attached proposal for amending
the city's 1992-93 budget is hereby offered in order that the City
can get on with its business of providing service to the public and
uncertainty can be removed from the minds of the general public as
well as City employees of where the city is headed regarding the
City budget, service levels, etc.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city Council of
the city of Chula vista does hereby amend the FY 1992-93 Budget to
account for revenue reductions from the State of California as
shown in Attachment A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by
reference as if set forth in full.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
John Goss, city Manager
.la~
D. Richard Rudolf,
city Attorney
ID,;.5 / 10"';'.
CUT LIST SUMMARY
:~~:p~~~~:~~~~::::::::::::::::::::.:..., .
Budget
Adj Budget
2% !erget
Dept Actual Roc Change. Tolal Take
REC % TO TAKE
Attorney $707.220 $707,220 $14.144 $19.240 $2.117 $21.357 3.0%
Clerk $293.080 $293,080 $5,862 $5.86:1 ($479) $5.386 1.8%
Administration $1,228.460 $1.228,460 $24,MS $28,1D:l $28,105 2.3%
Mgmt & Info Sw $1,D:l2.160 $1.o:l2.160 $21,043 $84,608 ($2,096) $82,512 7.8%
Personnel $932 ,240 $932.240 $18,64:5 $18,646 $18,646 2.0%
Comm Dev $1,24:5,9:50 $1,24:5,900 $24,919 $24,268 $ln $24,445 2.0%
~ Finance $1,367.:580 $1.367.:580 $27.3:52 $27.3:50 $27,350 2.0%
'~ Planning $1 ,897.920 $1,897,920 $37,9:58 $37.9:58 ($1 ,6:53) $36,305 1.9%
Non-Dept ($963.470) $476,nO $9,= $1:5.000 $1 ,:500 $16,500 3.:5%
~ Police $1:5,896.160 $1 :5,896,160 $317.923 $283,:500 $283,500 1.8%
~ Fire $6.87:5,16:5 $6.87:5,16:5 $137,:503 $213,789 $213,789 3.1%
Bldg & Hou. $1.382,900 $1.382.900 $27,6:57 $3:5,723 $35,723 2.6%
Public Works $11,:532,420 $5,n6.972 $11 :5,:539 $70,660 ($3,140) $67,520 1.2%
Parks & Roc $4,86:1,673 $4.86:1.673 $93,313 $20,772 $1:5,141 $35.913 0.8%
Library $3,323.800 $3,323.800 $66.476 $60.749 $60,749 1.8%
Nature Interpretive Ctr $4:50,370 $199,120 $3,982 $4.000 $4,000 2.0%
$51,887.:578 $47.321,120 $946.422 $9:50,233 $11 ,:567 $961,800 2.0%
CUT'lilAn'.WOl
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
II
Meeting Date 9/8/92
SUBMITTED BY:
PUBLIC HEARING: - Conditional Use Permit PCC-92-40:
Appeal of Planning Commission Approval of a Request
to Install Interim Fire station No. 6 at the
southwest corner of Lane Avenue and Fenton street;
Appellant - California Land Associates
/'M/
Director of Planning ):;;lO~
ITEM TITLE:
,."\. '
REVIEWED BY: city Managerv4 \)J,~~I (4/sths Vote: Yes_No-1L)
The city of Chula vista proposes to install Interim Fire station
No. 6 at the southeast corner of Fenton street and Lane Avenue,
2396 Fenton street, APN 595-232-10, in the BC-1 zoning district as
defined in the EastLake Planned Community District Regulations.
This station will be operated at this location until such time as
a permanent station is constructed either in the vicinity or on the
same site.
California Land Associates, the owner of the office building
directly east of the proposed site, has appealed the decision of
the Planning commission approving PCC-92-40.
The Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that this
project is a Class 3 (c) Categorical Exemption per the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
RECOMMENDATION: That Council conceptually approve "option 3"
described in the report, which would involve relocation of the
facility to an alternate portion of the site, as well as
architectural enhancements; and that the hearing be continued to
the meeting of September 22 to allow staff to provide public notice
of the revised proposal prior to final action by the Council.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: On July 8, 1992 the Planning
Commission voted 6-to-0 to approve PCC-92-40.
DISCUSSION:
On August 25, 1992, the city council considered the appeal of the
~ Conditional Use Permit. (See attached Council Agenda Statement for
Of n}"that hearing.) At the conclusion of their discussion at that time,
~ .~~ the council continued the public hearing on this matter for two
e~~ weeks, and directed staff to meet with the appellant to discuss
~ possible modifications to the facility which would enhance it
architecturally, as well as evaluating alternative locations for
siting the facility. Two meetings were subsequently held with the
Assistant City Manager, Fire Chief, Director of Planning,
\~ -I
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date
1\
9/8/92
representatives of Eastlake, and the appellant to discuss three
specific options:
option 1
Under this option, the buildings would be retained in their current
location. However, the design of the buildings would be modified
to incorporate architectural features such as articulated wall
planes, "commercial type" window treatments, and use of materials
and colors which would be more in harmony with the existing
business park architecture (architectural drawings will be
available at the Council meeting). The cost estimate for this
option is $25,000 to $30,000. However, the appellant has stated
that even with these enhancements to the base structures, a
temporary facility is not acceptable to him due to its potential
impact on the value of his property.
option 2
Under this option, the buildings would be moved about 180 feet from
the appellant's building to the southwest, and would include the
same architectural enhancements included in Option 1. This option
would appear to have a less direct physical relationship to the
appellant's building, and would be advantageous to the City in that
it would allow both the temporary and permanent fire station to be
sited on the same one-acre portion of the site which was originally
agreed to by the City and Eastlake. The cost of this option,
including both relocation costs and architectural enhancements
described above, would be $70,000 to $75,000. The appellant has
stated that this option is not acceptable for the same reasons as
option 1, in that he feels that this alternative location would
still have a negative impact on his property.
option 3
Under this option, the buildings would be relocated onto a portion
of the same parcel which is approximately 400 feet south of the
appellant's building. Under this option, the cost of relocation
and architectural enhancements would be $75,000 to $80,000. The
appellant has stated that this option is acceptable and would
satisfy all objections which led to his appeal, because it moves
the structures from the direct line-of-sight of his building, and
therefore will not have a negative impact on his property values.
Furthermore, while this option would require that additional land
area be utilized for the temporary facility outside of the one-acre
site being reserved for the permanent facility, EastLake has
indicated that this is acceptable to them. Thus, this option has
the support of both the appellant and the developer.
\\~~
Page 3, Item
Meeting Date
tl
9/8/92
After reviewing these options, City staff feels that any of the
three alternatives would provide a facility which would fit well
into the existing business park, and would not detrqct from the
overall character of the area. However, given the appellant's
position regarding the various options, and the desire of both City
staff and the Eastlake company that this project be completed as
expeditiously as possible, it is recommended that the city council
conceptually approve option 3. If council concurs with this
recommendation, staff would recommend that Council continue final
action on this matter for an additional two weeks to allow staff to
provide mailed notices of the revised proposal to property owners
within 500 feet of the site, with final action on the Conditional
Use Permit to be scheduled for September 22. At the same time,
staff will review the existing agreement between the City and
Eastlake regarding the construction of this facility, and will
return with any necessary amendments at that time.
FISCAL IMPACT: As noted above, implementation of option 3 would
add $75,000 to $80,000 to the total cost of the project. These
costs would be charged to the developer, with all or a portion of
these costs potentially being reimbursed to the developer from
Public Facilities Development Impact Fees; this matter will be
further clarified in the final agreement between the city and
developer, which will be returned in two weeks.
(pCC9240..113)
\\<?
./
FENTON
OTAY
UJ
::>
z
UJ
>
c:(
o
D :
oP,~o::L----_
'-
OPTION 1
,
[0 I
,
,
OPTION 3
--~
....
UJ
Z
c:(
...I
LAKES
ROAD
\\ -y.
STREET
,
,
/
,
(;/
,
,
APPELLANT'S
PROPERTY
PCC-92-40
FIRE STATION No.6
PROPOSED OPTIONS
.
o
FEET
,$
100'
Minutes
August 25, 1992
Page 4
U~~OFFIClj'L MINUTES
13. PUBUC HEARING PCC-92-40: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: APPEAL OF PLANNING
COMMISSION APPROVAL OF A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCT INTERIM FIRE STATION NUMBER SIX AT TIlE
SOUTI-IWEST CORNER OF LANE AVENUE AND FENTON STREET; APPEU..ANT - CALIFORNIA LAND
ASSOaATES _ Appeal of Planning Commission approval PCC-92-40 for the City application to construct an
interim fIre station at the southwest comer of Fenton Street and Lane Avenue, 2396 Fenton Street. Staff
recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Planning) Continued from the 8/11/92 meeting.
RESOLUTION 16752 PCC-92-40 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: APPROVAL OF REQUEST TO
CONSTRUCT INTERIM FIRE STATION NUMBER SIX AT THE SOUTI-IWEST CORNER OF LANE AVENUE AND
FENTON STREET; APPEU..ANT - CALIFORNIA LAND ASSOCIATES
Robert Leiter, Director of Planning, stated there were photographs and maps of the site if there was an
interest in viewing those at any time during the discussion.
Councilman Moore asked if the design of the building had gone through Design Review for proper checks
and balances.
Mr. Leiter responded that the project had gone through administrative design review based on the zoning
regulations that applied to the particular project, and was found to be acceptable on that basis. It had also
gone through the Homeowners Association for EastLake.
This being the time and place as advertised, the public hearing was declared open.
Gordon Dunfee, 6480 Weathers PI., Ste. 220, San Diego, CA 92121, representing California Land Association,
spoke in opposition to staff recommendation. He presented pictures of the building and suggested that other
sites be proposed.
Councilwoman Horton asked if it were deeiCled to make the structure permanent, going through the proper
Design Review channels, would that be acceptable to Mr. Dunfee as a site for the City's fire station.
Mr. Dunfee responded that they would not have a problem if a permanent fire station was held to the same
standards of Design Review that all the other property owners in the area were held to. The aesthetic
quality, as it affected their property, was their main concern, not the use.
Jerome E. Eggers, 350 West Ash, Ste. 1100, San Diego, CA 92101, Attorney for California Land Association,
spoke in opposition to staff recommendation.
There being no further public testimony, the public hearing was declared closed.
Councilman Malcolm was disappointed that Mr. Dunfee had to tell him that the City issued a permit to itself,
and the only way they could issue that permit legally was if they found it to be temporary and to be there
less than 90 days. He found it appalling that there were two sets of standards: one for the home owners
and the business people in the community and one for the City of Chula Vista. He asked what the definition
was of temporary use under CEQA.
Mr. Leiter did not believe the time frame was specifically defined but it would be a modular removable
structure that could be removed after a certain period of time. His understanding was that the agreement
between the City and EastLake called for a maximum of approximately seven years and indicated that the
removal should occur before that time.
City Attorney Boogaard stated that if both parties agreed, the lease could be extended and the building could
be there longer than the lease term. If it violated any entitlement grants, i.e. CUP condition, then it could
be revoked.
Sam Lopez, Fire Chief, stated staff was trying to save the City money and that was why they did not know
where the permanent location was going to be. Once the Otay Ranch Development Plan was finalized, they
11-5
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
Minutes
August 25, 1992
Page 5
would know how many fire stations were needed in Gtay Ranch and whether they were going to go back
to the original Salt Creek site. He stated that density was the issue. If the City was going to put in
highrises, that would restrict how far the stations would be spaced. They had to consider not only the travel
time to the building but also the number of floors. He said they may come up with a multiple company
station at Gtay Ranch depending on density. They may also look at alternate types of emergency medical
delivery. Staff was trying to look at all those things before making a firm decision. He and his fire fighters
would like to have a permanent station in the next couple of years.
Councilman Malcolm would like to give them a permanent building quicker than that. He stated that the
building was unacceptable to him. EastLake should be stopped from issuing permits or provide proper fire
service. If the EastLake and Salt Creek areas had to be served he thought they should be able to determine
the location of the fire stations based on the adopted circulation element in the City.
Chief Lopez responded that the master plan called for the fire station in Salt Creek Ranch but that was not
built yet. They did not have a road network to get from Salt Creek Ranch to the high school which was a
major concern. They could build a permanent station there but in five or ten years when Salt Creek was
in, they would be out of their response time level if they went one way or the other.
Councilman Malcolm thought one of two things needed to be done: 1) appropriate funds to build and have
Chief Lopez decide if it was a good permanent spot and build the permanent structure, or 2) the codes were
met and standards applied to everyone.
Councilman Moore suggested the item be tabled until staff had worked with the developers regarding
options.
MOTION: (Moore/Malcolm) refer to staff to work with EastLake to come up with a permanent site and
logic, if it had to remain for 18 months or so, give Council that short time frame and think about relocating
on a different part of that lot with a report back to Council.
Sid Morris, Assistant City Manager, stated that staff was really in control of the situation in that they wanted
responsibility in being able to site the next station. If they were forced into selecting a station at that point,
it could force them into siting a station that ultimately could require them to site two stations rather than
a single station. If they were allowed to see the development of Gtay Ranch, find out what the densities
were, find out what the requirements were, then staff could place one station that could answer the
requirements for the entire area rather than ultimately putting in two stations. If staff had further time to
plan it out appropriately that could save them $800,000 a year in round figures. He doubted that there was
anything staff could say at that point that would make the building prettier but there were renderings that
could give Council a better feel for what the finished product would look like. He stated that there were
meetings at staff level with Mr. Dunfee and alternatives were discussed. Staff offered in those meetings to
move the station to a different portion of the lot and in those meetings that was not an acceptable
alternative. If that was an acceptable alternative or at least something worth discussion, then he suggested
that the item be deferred to allow staff time to research that item with Mr. Dunfee and! or his representative
and return to Council. He stated that by completing the balance of construction it would offer balance to
the project, the landscaping would offer amenities and at least hide the temporariness of the facility. While
the photos were accurate in their depiction, they were unfair because they only showed one aspect or an
incomplete aspect of the project. The project was a balanced project and had been architecturally designed
to be acceptable to the site. Staff would be willing to look at possible alternatives but believed that it was
acceptable.
Mayor Nader asked if the City had the ability through some agreement with EastLake to require EastLake
to pay for a different site or for a better structure at that site until they had a permanent site.
City Attorney Boogaard stated they had received in writing and verbally a threat of litigation which he
judged to be immanent and requested the privilege of advising in closed session on the matter.
The City Council recessed to closed session at 7:29 p.m. and reconvened at 7:45 p.m.
\\-10
Minutes
August 25, 1992
Page 6
UNOFFICIAL MINUTES
Councilman Malcolm asked Mr. Dunfee if the City made some corrections to the building and made it
ascetically pleasing and if staff worked with him by providing proper landscaping, would he then support
the project.
Mr. Dunfee responded that he would be willing to sit down with staff if they would also consider alternate
locations. He proposed that it be moved to the south end of the parcel so it would not block their project
from the street visibility which was hurting their value and marketability. If it were moved to the south end
of the parcel it could be tucked up against the embankment, there could be a temporary road put in and
the same structure and module units could be used. It would be blocked visually just by the nature of the
height of the pad from the road and it would not impact their project. He would commit himself to work
with City staff, the City Manager, and the Fire Department if they would also consider alternate locations.
Councilman Moore stated that one of the concerns about location was if they really knew what plan was
going to be accepted for the Otay Ranch then that would dictate whether the permanent station would be
there. He understood that the site for the temporary station was not in the area where the permanent one
would go. So the temporary station had a location there so the City could still build the permanent station
where needed with the right set backs, etc. and the right designs.
Mr. Dunfee stated that in his discussions with EastLake there were probably four to six sites, within a two
block area of where the temporary project was currently built, that would be suitable from response time
and development capability that they would be happy to accept.
Councilman Rindone stated that another aspect was being introduced of concern and that was accessibility.
If they were talking about construction of additional temporary roads, one of the major purposes of the Fire
Department was to be able to get to a main road immediately. He thought they had an obligation to the
residents of EastLake to move in a timely manner to provide for public safety.
SUBSTITIITE MaTI ON # 1: (Moore/Malcolm) to refer item back to staff to review the concerns of both the
Council and the property owners and return to the City Council with options in two weeks.
SUBSTITIITE MOTION #2: (Nader/Moore) to use the following language suggested by City Attorney
Boogaard: that the Council grant the conditional use permit for the subject site for the period of 18 months
subject to the conditions and proposed resolution and on the further condition that staff and EastLake offer
to meet and confer, in good faith, with California Land Association to agree and implement satisfactory
landscape aesthetic treatments, and if necessary, relocation within said lot and that the Council commission
a master fire plan update pursuant to a schedule that provides for a permanent site determination within
that 18 months.
Assistant City Manager Morris stated that 18 months could force poor planning on staffs part and tie them
into a site that was too expensive. It had always been staffs intent to determine the final site as soon as
possible.
VOTE ON SUBSTITIITE MOTION #2: failed 2-3 with Councilwoman Horton, Councilmembers Malcolm and
Rindone opposed.
VOTE ON SUBSTITIITE MOTION #1: approved 4-1 with Mayor Nader opposed.
\\-l
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item J 2.
Meeting Date 9/8/92
ITEM TITLE:
Public Hearing: To consider construction of a raised median on
Telegraph Canyon Road through the intersection of Apache Drive
Resolution 16~ O~ Authorizing the Director of Public Works to
approve a construction change order on Telegraph Canyon Road Phase III
widening project to construct a landscaped raised median across Apache
Drive
SUBMITTED BY:
Director of Public wor~
City Manager J; '0 ,J;~ 1
(4/5ths Vote: Yes_NoX)
REVIEWED BY:
The City Council, on June 23, 1992 by a vote of 3-0-2 (Nader/Malcolm absent), directed staff
by Resolution 16685 to install a temporary sign prohibiting vehicles traveling eastbound on
Telegraph Canyon Road from turning left to northbound Apache Drive during the weekday hours
of 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. This prohibition is intended to eliminate Southwestern College
students from using Apache Drive as a shortcut. The temporary sign is to remain in place until
construction of the Telegraph Canyon Road/Otay Lakes Road project is completed later this
year. The Council further directed staff to explore the feasibility of constructing a raised median
on Telegraph Canyon Road across Apache Drive as a permanent deterrent against shortcut traffic
and as a means of eliminating hazardous left turn maneuvers.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council accept staffs report and adopt the resolution
authorizing the Director of Public Works to approve a change order on the Telegraph Canyon
Road widening project (phase III) to construct a raised median on Telegraph Canyon Road
through the intersection of Apache Drive.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: The Safety Commission, at their March
12, 1992 meeting, voted 6-0-1 (Padilla absent) to instruct staff to meet with the Charter Point
Homeowners Association Board of Directors at the earliest possible time to discuss traffic issues
and report back to the Commission of its progress.
At their May 14, 1992 meeting, the Safety Commission voted 6-1, with Pitts against, to accept
staffs recommendation to deny a request for a "NO LEFT TURN FROM 7:00 A.M. - 9:00
A.M." sign on Telegraph Canyon Road. The Safety Commission directed staff to continue to
work with the contractor and the construction inspection section to reduce the impact of through
traffic on Apache Drive during the traffic detour phase; and to research the possibility of
modifying the contract to extend the median on Telegraph Canyon Road through Apache Drive
to prohibit left turn access and to report back at a following meeting.
WPC TCRAPACHE.HAL
File: AN-012
/2 - (
Page 2, Item } 2
Meeting Date 9/8/92
Additionally, the Safety Commission voted 6-1, with Chidester against, to place a temporary
barrier at the intersection of Apache Drive and Telegraph Canyon Road now. However, the
Safety Commission, at their June 11, 1992 meeting, voted 7-0 to defer the installation of a
temporary barrier until the construction on Telegraph Canyon Road is completed and a traffic
study of the area shows that the safety of area residents can only be mitigated by the installation
of a raised median.
DISCUSSION:
Backl1round:
The City Council on June 23, 1992 approved the installation of a temporary "No Left Turn" sign
to remain in place until the Telegraph Canyon Road construction project is completed later this
year to deal with the shortcutting problem as noted by the Charter Point Homeowner's
Association. Concurrent with this recommendation the City Council further directed staff to
look into the feasibility of amending the Telegraph Construction Project to include a median
across the intersection of Apache Drive as a permanent solution to a potential intersection safety
problem. This direction was in response to the Council's concern for the safety of motorists
attempting to turn left into and out of Apache Drive after the construction of Telegraph Canyon
Road is completed and there are six lanes of high volume, high speed traffic.
At the present time there is approximately 22,000 vehicles per day traveling on Telegraph
Canyon Road. Traffic volumes are expected to increase significantly in the near future as a
result of new developments in the area such as the EastLake Greens, Kaiser Hospital and Salt
Creek. Traffic volumes on Telegraph Canyon Road will grow to around 50,000 vehicles per
day when these and other developments such as Otay Ranch, the Olympic Training Center, Salt
Creek Ranch and other developments in the Eastern Territory are completed. Telegraph Canyon
road is designated as a six lane arterial designed with no fronting property access. No parking
is permitted and intersections are spaced far apart. These design features allow motorists to
travel safely at high speeds.
It should be noted that the intersection of Telegraph Canyon Road and Apache Drive will remain
unsignalized in the future as there is not sufficient volume on Apache Drive to warrant
signalization now and in the future when the area is built out. Thus, the safety risk for motorists
turning left out of Apache Drive or into Apache Drive from Telegraph Canyon Road will
remain. Actually the left turn maneuver out of Apache Drive has a higher safety risk than the
left turn maneuver into Apache Drive. The reason for this safety differential is the fact that
motorists turning out of Apache Drive must turn left across three lanes of westbound traffic and
at the same time be cognizant of eastbound traffic in order to complete their maneuver. On the
other hand, motorists turning left into Apache Drive need only be aware of opposing westbound
traffic.
Because both left turn maneuvers represent high traffic safety risks, the ideal solution would be
to extend the median across the intersection of Apache Drive to prevent all left turns. Extending
WPC TCRAPACHE.HAL
File: AN-012
/)-2
Page 3, Item /2..
Meeting Date 9/8/92
the median across Apache Drive (see attached plat) will cause some Charter Point residents to
travel out-of-direction to reach their destinations. The out-of-direction travel is estimated to
range up to 3 minutes depending on where the motorist resides within the Charter Point
subdivision.
The safety risks associated with left turns at Apache Drive can be reduced by a special median
design. This design, referred to as "Modified Median Alternative" (see attached plat) would
allow left turns onto Apache Drive but would prevent left turns out of Apache Drive. This
alternative would prohibit the southbound to eastbound left turns out of Apache Drive, and
westbound to eastbound U-turns on Telegraph Canyon Road. The median could be designed
similar to the existing median at the Otay Lakes Mobilehome Park. Today, only 4% of the
traffic attempts the left turn out of Apache Drive. With the completion of the Telegraph Canyon
Road widening, EastLake High School and shopping center at Otay Lakes Road and EastLake
Parkway, left turn maneuvers will increase. Any left turn prohibitions or medians added at the
intersection of Telegraph Canyon Road and Apache Drive will also affect the 54 single family
unit Woodcrest Southwestern subdivision. This subdivision is located west of the Charter Point
subdivision off of Apache Drive. Approximately half of these homes have been completed and
have residents.
If this alternative is approved, Charter Point and Woodcrest Southwestern subdivisions would
have to use the east end of Apache Drive onto southbound Otay Lakes Road to go east. This
would those divert motorists to the signalized intersection of Otay Lakes Road and Telegraph
Road, which is a safer move. It should be noted that this alternative does not do anything to
reduce eastbound to northbound left turns onto Apache Drive from Telegraph Canyon Road
which has been the source of many complaints from the Charter Point Homeowners Association.
Vehicles may continue use Apache Drive as a shortcut to Southwestern College and attempt to
make illegal dual left turn maneuvers during peak periods at Apache Drive and Otay Lakes
Road, but would allow local residents to enter the subdivision more directly from the west
without going through the Otay Lakes Road intersection Once the current construction is
completed, staff believes the current "short cut" traffic will end because the improvements and
signalization will eliminate the current congestion at Otay Lakes Road. In addition, this "short
cut" traffic would still have to wait to get out of Apache Drive. This alternative would also not
eliminate the potential for eastbound to northbound left turn versus westbound through traffic
accidents to occur. This alternative would eliminate the southbound to eastbound left turn versus
westbound through traffic accidents.
The potential safety risks associated with left turn maneuvers at Apache Drive and Telegraph
Canyon Road are based on accident experience at other similar intersections where residential
streets intersect six-lane high speed, high volume roadways. An example is Mission Gorge Road
in the San Carlos residential area of the City of San Diego. In that case there were numerous
injury and some fatal accidents at unsignalized intersections where left turns were permitted.
The City of San Diego has since modified the intersection to prevent left turns.
WPC TCRAPACHE.HAL
File: AN-012
/.2-3
Page 4, Item I ~
Meeting Date 9/8/92
Conclusion:
Staff believes that the safety benefits derived by constructing a median across Apache Drive to
prevent left turns more than offsets the slight out-of-direction inconvenience to the Charter Point
residents and, since convenient alternative routes are available to the residents, staff recommends
that the City Council adopt this resolution approving a change order on the Telegraph Canyon
Road widening project to construct a raised median across the intersection of Apache Drive.
The Charter Point Homeowners Association originally indicated they did not want the median
closed. However, recent conversations with their President, who indicated she is representing
the Board's position, indicate that they do not believe the "No Left Turn" signs have been
effective and the full raised median may now be the only solution to their problem. The Board
President has also been made aware of the left turn in only option and indicated she, as well as
the Board, do not believe this alternative will solve their problem. Since the President indicated
she speaks for the Board, we have not had any further meeting with that entire body.
All residents of the Charter Point and Woodcrest Southwestern subdivisions as well as the Chula
Vista Elementary and Sweetwater Union High School Districts have been notified of tonight's
meeting.
If this recommendation is adopted, staff will prepare a change order to put in this length of
median on the Otay Lakes Road/Telegraph Canyon Road project. In connection with other
median revisions necessitated by the detours and construction phasing, the total cost is estimated
to be $115,000. The $115,000 cost includes:
1) The construction of 280' median island that was omitted from the previous
construction phase (Phase II) of Telegraph Canyon Road ($25,000) to permit
detour phasing.
2) The cost of extending the raised median across the intersection of Apache Drive
a distance of approximately 375' ($33,000) and,
3) The construction of the existing median to close of the 275' left turn pocket
($57,000).
FISCAL IMPACT: The original project was awarded for $5.5 million, $6.3 million was
budgeted for the project. The median work previously described above can be taken from these
remaining funds. The estimated additional $115,000 is available from account 621-5210-5399.
Attachments:
Area Plats
Median Alternatives
City Council minutes dated June 23, 1992 (excerpt)
Safety Commission Minutes
WPC TCRAPACHB.HAL
File: AN-012
/;. -~
RESOLUTION NO. 16805
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING THE DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC
WORKS TO APPROVE A CONSTRUCTION CHANGE ORDER
ON TELEGRAPH CANYON ROAD PHASE III WIDENING
PROJECT TO CONSTRUCT A LANDSCAPED RAISED
MEDIAN ACROSS APACHE DRIVE
WHEREAS, the city Council, on June 23, 1992 by a vote of
3-0-2 (Nader/Malcolm absent), directed staff by Resolution 16685 to
install a temporary sign prohibiting vehicles traveling eastbound
on Telegraph Canyon Road from turning left to northbound Apache
Drive during the weekday hours of 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m.; and
WHEREAS, said prohibition is intended to eliminate
Southwestern college students from using Apache Drive as a shortcut
with the temporary sign to remain in place until construction of
the Telegraph Canyon Road/Otay Lakes Road project is completed
later this year; and
WHEREAS, Council further directed staff to explore the
feasibility of constructing a raised median on Telegraph Canyon
Road across Apache Drive as a permanent deterrent against shortcut
traffic and as a means of eliminating hazardous left turn
maneuvers; and
WHEREAS, staff believes that the safety benefits derived
by constructing a modified median across Apache Drive to prevent
left turns easterly onto Telegraph canyon Road more than offsets
the slight out-of-direction inconvenience to the Charter Point
residents; and
WHEREAS, convenient alternative routes are not available
to the residents, and allowing left turns into Apache Drive will
safely accommodate Charter Point residents, a change order on the
Telegraph Canyon Road widening project to construct a landscaped
modified raised median across the intersection of Apache Drive is
appropriate.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city Council of
the City of Chula vista does hereby authorize the Director of
Public Works to approve a change order on the Telegraph Canyon Road
Phase III widening project to construct a modified (Option 2, Cost
Items 1 and 2) raised median on Telegraph Canyon Road through the
intersection of Apache Drive to prohibit left-hand turns east to
Telegraph Canyon Road.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
,~~tj- ,,~L,
D. Richard Rudo
City Attorney
F:home\attorney\TCRApache
\d - '$
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item ).3
Meeting Date 9/8/92
ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing: PCA-92-01 - Consideration of amendments to the
Municipal Code to establish procedures to expedite processing of
sign permits and to allow for electronic message board signs
Ordinance A 52, Amending Chapters 19.04 and 19.60 of
the Municipal Code to establish procedures to expedite processing
of sign permits and to allow for electronic message board signs
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Planning ~{
Community Development Director 1.,. ':;.
. .
\, ".~
REVIEWED BY: City Manager ~Y,i p~ ~~\ (4/5ths Vote: Yes_NolU
On January 28, 1992, the City Council directed the staff of the Planning Department and
City Attorney to prepare draft amendments to the City's sign regulations to address: 1)
modification of the review process for sign permits to expedite processing; 2) allowance
of electronic message board signs in commercially zoned areas; and, 3) allowance of
combination sign-murals which may exceed the size restrictions for commercial signs.
The draft amendments were distributed for comment to several groups and organizations,
including the Planning Commission and Design Review Committee, and were presented
to the City Council at a Council workshop held on March 18, 1992. After consideration
and discussion, the Council rejected the proposal for combination sign-murals and
directed staft to proceed with hearings on the amendments regarding accelerated sign
processing and electronic message board signs.
The Environmental Review Coordinator conducted an Initial Study, IS-92-44, of potential
environmental impacts associated with the amendments. Based on the attached Initial
Study and comments thereon, the Coordinator has concluded there would be no
significant impacts, and recommends adoption of the Negative Declaration issued on
IS-92-44.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Based on the Initial Study and comments on the Initial Study and Negative
Declaration, find that this proposal will have no significant environmental impacts
and adopt the Negative Declaration issued on IS-92-44.
2. Adopt a motion to enact an ordinance amending the Municipal Code as shown
on the draft ordinance attached hereto.
WPC F:\hom9\planning\14.92
\~ '1
Page 2, Item 13
Meeting Date 9/8/92
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION:
1. On August 6,1992, the Town Centre Project Area Committee voted unanimously
(7-0) recommending that the City Council deny the proposed ordinance relating
to electronic message board signs (minutes attached).
2. On August 12, 1992 the Planning Commission voted 5 to 1 with one absent
recommending that the Municipal Code be amended in accordance with
Resolution PCA-92-01 (minutes attached).
DISCUSSION:
1. Accelerated Sian Processina
This amendment would require the Zoning Administrator (or the Design Review
Committee on appeal) to render a decision on a sign permit within seven (7) days
(or the next available meeting in the case of the DRC). Failure to act within
these timeframes would allow the applicant to demand in writing that a decision
be made within 3 working days (or at the next available DRC meeting) or the
permit would be deemed approved. It would also require that if a sign permit is
denied by either the ZA or DRC, the applicant would have to be informed in
writing of the changes necessary in order to approve the permit.
Staff and the DRC believe the timeframes can be met. The DRC's workload is
heavy - 3 to 4 hour meetings are not uncommon - but few sign appeals are
anticipated, and probably no more than one would be considered at any particular
meeting. Also, the Committee would have the benefit of staff's recommendations
in their deliberations on necessary changes in the case of a denial. Any decision
by the Zoning Administrator or DRC would be appealable to the Planning
Commission and the City Council.
2. Electronic Messaae Board Sians
The Code presently prohibits all moving, animated or flashing signs with the
exception of barber poles and time-and-temperature signs. This amendment
would allow for the consideration of electronic message board signs by the
Redevelopment Agency upon recommendation by the Design Review Committee
in C-O, C-C, and I-L zoned areas located within either the Town Centre I, Town
Centre II or Otay Valley Road redevelopment areas. The amendment limits such
signs to specific zones in Redevelopment Project areas where interest has been
expressed in the placement of message board signs. This approach will allow
the City to gain some experience with readerboard signs before considering any
wider application. A message board sign has been proposed at the southeast
WPC F:\home\planning\14.92
\~.:z..
Page 3, Item I 3
Meeting Date 9/8/92
corner of Third Avenue and "H" Street. The property is zoned C-O and is located
in the Town Centre I redevelopment area. Some interest has also been
expressed with regard to the proposed auto center on the south side of Otay
Valley Road, just east of the 1-805 freeway. This property is zoned I-L and
located in the Otay Valley Road redevelopment area. Thus, the amendment has
been drafted to accommodate and limit message boards within the
redevelopment areas in order to test their effectiveness and aesthetic quality.
The Council had recommended that said signs be subject to Planning
Commission consideration. However, the amendment seeks to limit the use of
these signs to certain commercial sites in specific redevelopment areas within
which the Planning Commission is not currently a part of the review process.
Therefore, inclusion of the Planning Commission would be advisory only and
would add to the time needed to process the request. It is for that reason that
the proposed amendment does not include Planning Commission review.
The requirements include that 30% of the message board operation during
normal business hours must be devoted to non-commercial messages, and that
one message board sign be located no closer than 1/2 mile to another message
board sign. The signs must also be located on a major or collector street, which
would exclude them from such streets as Landis and Church Avenues in Town
Centre I.
The amendment provides that a message board must be accommodated within
the existing limits on maximum sign area in the C-C and I-L zone, and would
allow up to an additional 50 square feet of sign area to accommodate a message
board in the C-O zone. This proposed increase in the C-O zone is based on the
fact that the existing commercial office sign provisions are intended to provide for
limited identification only, and could not reasonably allow for the consideration of
a message board without this adjustment.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
WPC F:\homel.panning\14.92
1~-3 (1!'''1
EXHIBIT "A"
PROPOSED ZONING TEXT AMENDMENT
PCA-92-01
Chapter 19.04
DEFINITIONS
19.04.235 Sian. Electronic messaae board.
Electronic messaae board sian means a sian whose messaae is
disolayed in liahts or liaht emittina diodes. and is electronicallY
chanaeable.
Chapter 19.60
SIGNS
19.60.030 Application-contents requi~d-Determination authority-
Appeals.
All signs requJ.rJ.ng a sign permit shall be submitted for
approval by the zoning administrator, prior to installation exceot
electronic messaae board sians (see 19.60.600). The application
shall indicate the size, location, design, color, lighting and
materials of all signs to be erected. The application shall also
contain sufficient information on the architecture, colors and
materials of the building on the site, as is necessary to determine
compatibility of the sign to the building. In addition, the
applicant shall submit a color rendering and/or paint sample boards
or chips and/or actual materials to be used on the sign.
The zoning administrator. or the desian review committee on
aooeal. shall determine whether approval shall be granted for any
sign based on its conformance with the regulations and design
standards set forth herein and in the city desian manual.
Where an aoolication is denied by the zonina administrator. or the
desian review committee on aooeal. the aoolicant shall be informed
in writina of the chanaes necessary in order to aoorove the
aoolication. If the aoolicant chooses to amend the aoolication to
reflect said chanaes. the zonina administrator shall arant the
oermit.
The zonina administrator shall render a decision on a sian
oermit within seven workina days of the date of aoolication. If at
the end of that oeriod a decision has not been reached. the
aoolicant may demand in writina that action be taken on the oermit.
The zonina administrator shall render a decision within three
1
I ~--S
workina days of the date of the receiot of the written demand or
the oermit shall be deemed aooroved as submitted. The decision of
the zoning administrator may be appealed to the plaftftift~ eemmissieft
iR aeeeraaaee wit-h 'the ]?lrs7isiefls sf E:e.et.iea 19.1 t. eS9. desian
review committee within ten workina davs after the decision is
rendered. In the absence of such appeal, the determination by the
zoning administrator shall be final.
The desian review committee shall render a decision on a sian
aooeal at the next available desian review committee meetina at
which a auorum is oresent. An aooeal received at least ten davs
orior to a desian review committee meetina shall be scheduled for
that meetina. If the desian review committee fails to render a
decision at the next available meetina. the aoolicant may demand in
writina that action be taken. The desian review committee shall
render a decision at the next available meetina followina receiot
of the written demand or the aooeal
shall be deemed aooroved as submitted. The decision of the
desian review committee may be further aooealed in accordance with
the orovisions of Section 19.14.583.
Flashing, animated or movlng signs
prohibited- Exceptions-other prohibited signs.
No sign, as defined in this chapter, shall be moving, nor
shall light be intermittent or flashing, with the exception of time
and temperature signs... aM barber poles and electronic messaae
board sians subiect to the orovisions of Section 19.60.600.
19.60.170
Signs are also prohibited with the exceotion of those listed
as oermitted in the above oaraaraoh which:
A. Intermittently reflect lights from either an artificial
source or from the sun; or
B. Have an illumination which is intermittent, flashing,
scintillating or of varying intensity; or
C. Have any visible portion in motion, either constantly or
at intervals, which motion may be caused by either artificial
or natural sources; or
D. utilize whirligigs or any similar item which uses wind as
its source of power.
19.60.600 Electronic Messaae Board Reaulations
Electronic messaae board sians may be allowed in any co. CC
or IL zoned areas located within Town Centre I. Town Centre II and
2
\:,-(."
Otav Valley Road redevelopment areas. sub;ect to conditions deemed
appropriate bv the Redevelopment Aaencv upon recommendation bv the
Desian Review Committee as part of an approved sian proaram. Said
conditions shall include. but are not necessarilY limited to. the
followinq:
A. The location of said sian shall be at least one-half (1/2)
mile in any direction from any other lawfullY
permitted electronic messaae board sian:
B. The operator of said sian shall devote a minimum of thirty
percent (30%) of the time the sian is in operation durina
normal business hours of the establishment to messaaes
convevina non-commercial announcements or other messaaes of
benefit to the communitv in accordance with a detailed
operational proaram sub;ect to review and approval bv the
Community Development Department:
C. Said sians shall not result in an increase in the
allowable sian area for the type of sian in the zone. except
in the c-o zoned areas. in which case. additional sian area
for said sians UP to a maximum ~f fifty sauare feet. may be
allowed:
D. Said sians shall be located on ma;or or collector streets.
E. Rooftop and monument (around) electronic messaae board
sians are expresslY prohibited:
Failure to complv with any condition of approval shall be
considered arounds for revocation of the approved sian proaram.
ADDITIONS: XXXXXXX
DELETIONS: XXXXXXX
3
\~-1
:~~'t-.-o""\~-~~.::1.\ \~l.__.I.~-.-'CJ( --J -<<l~J~~_.____
__.__--1._'" __ ~__.__,
.....---
IJ(l.
..
. .
.,
-'". --
OM
- l
J
,
-------
I
I
I
I
I
i
1
I
I
..
..
OTAY VALLEY ROAD
REDEVELOPMENT AREA
(
I-lO t-CM (
NORTH - P c"A- "'f :/.- - t? I
I
j
I
1
1 LOCATOR
) \~~g-
-. .1-
".
ORDINANCE NO. 252q
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING TITLE 19
OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING SECTION 19.04.235
DEFINING ELECTRONIC MESSAGE BOARD SIGNS AND AMENDING
SECTION 19.60 TO ESTABLISH PROCEDURES TO EXPEDITE
PROCESSING SIGN PERMITS AND TO ALLOW FOR ELECTRONIC
MESSAGE BOARD SIGNS
WHEREAS, in January 1992, the City Council directed that amendments
to the City'S sign regulations to address: 1) modification of the
review process for sign permits to expedite processing; and 2)
allowance of electronic message board signs, and,
WHEREAS, an Initial Study, IS-92-44 of possible adverse
environmental impacts of the proposed amendment was conducted and
the Environmental Review Coordinator concluded that there would be
no significant effects and recommend,s adoption of the Negative
Declaration, and,
WHEREAS, on August 12, 1992 the Planning Commission voted 5 to 1
with one member absent to recommend that the city Council adopt the
amendment in accordance with Resolution PCA-92-01.
The City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby ordain as
follows:
SECTION I: That section 19.04.235 be added to the Municipal Code to
read as follows:
19.04.235 Siqn. Electronic messaqe board.
Electronic messaqe board siqn means a siqn
displaved in liqhts or liqht emittinq
electronicallv chanqeable.
whose messaqe is
diodes. and is
SECTION II: That sections 19.60.030 and 19.60.170 be amended and
Section19.60.600 be added to the Municipal Code to read as follows:
19.60.030 Application-Contents required-Determination
authority-Appeals.
All signs requiring a sign permit shall be submitted
for approval by the zoning administrator, prior to
installation except electronic messaqe board siqns (see
19.60.600\. The application shall indicate the size,
location, design, color, lighting and materials of all signs
to be erected. The application shall also contain
\ :? -q
sufficient information on the architecture, colors and
materials of the building on the site, as is necessary to
determine compatibility of the sign to the building. In
addition, the applicant shall submit a color rendering
and/or paint sample boards or chips and/or actual materials
to be used on the sign.
The zoning administrator. or the desian review
committee on aDDeal. shall determine whether approval
be granted for any sign based on its conformance with
regulations and design standards set forth herein and
city design manual. Where an aDDlication is denied bv
zonina administrator. or the desian review committee
aDDeal. the aDDlicant shall be informed in writina
the chanaes necessarv in order to aDDrove the
aDDlication. If the aDDlicant chooses to amend the
aDDlication to reflect said chanaes. the zonina
administrator shall arant the Dermit.
shall
the
in the
the
on
of
The zonina administrator shall render a decision on a
sian Dermit within seven workina davs of the date of
aDDlication. If at the end of that Deriod a decision has not
been reached. the aDDlicant mav demand in writina that
action be taken on the Dermit. The zonina administrator
shall render a decision within three workina davs of
the date of the receiDt of the written demand or the
Dermit shall be deemed aDDroved as submitted. The decision
of the zoning administrator may be appealed to the plaRRiR~
eemmioaieft iR aeeeraaRee ~i~h ~he pre~iaiefta sf Eee~ieR
19.14.050. desian review committee within ten workina davs
after the decision is rendered. In the absence of such
appeal, the determination by the zoning administrator shall
be final.
The desian review committee shall render a decision on
a sian aDDeal at the next available desian review committee
meetina at which a auorum is Dresent. An aDDeal received
at least ten davs Drior to a desian review committee
meetina shall be scheduled for that meetina. If the desian
review committee fails to render a decision at the next
available meetina. the aDDlicant mav demand in writina that
action be taken. The desian review committee shall render a
decision at the next available meetina followina receiDt of
the written demand or the aDDeal shall be deemed aDDroved as
submitted. The decision of the desian review committee
mav be further aDDealed in accordance with the
Drovisions of Section 19.14.583.
2
\~ -ID
19.60.170 Flashing, animated or moving
prohibited- Exceptions-Other prohibited signs.
signs
No sign, as defined in this chapter, shall be moving,
nor shall light be intermittent or flashing, with the
exception of time and temperature signs~ &ft& barber poles
and electronic messaae board sians sub;ect to the orovisions
of Section 19.60.600.
Signs are also prohibited with the exceotion of those
listed as oermitted in the above oaraaraoh which:
A. Intermittently reflect lights from either an
artificial source or from the sun; or
B. Have an illumination which is intermittent,
flashing, scintillating or of varying intensity; or
C. Have any visible portion in motion, either
constantly or at intervals, which motion may be caused
by either artificial or natyral sources; or
D. utilize whirligigs or any similar item which uses
wind as its source of power.
19.60.600 Electronic Messaae Board Reaulations
Electronic messaae board sians mav be allowed in anv
CO. CC or IL zoned areas located within Town Centre I. Town
Centre II and otav Valley Road redevelooment areas.
sub;ect to conditions deemed aoorooriate bV the
Redevelooment Aaencv uoon recommendation bv the Desian
Review Committee as Dart of an aooroved sian oroaram. Said
conditions shall include. but are not necessarily limited
to. the followina:
A. The location of said sian shall be at least one-half
(1/2\ mile in any direction from any other
lawfullY oermitted electronic messaae board sian:
B. The ooerator of said sian shall devote a minimum of
thirty oercent (30%\ of the time the sian is in
ooeration durina normal business hours of the
establishment to messaaes convevina non-commercial
announcements or other messaaes of benefit to the
community in accordance with a detailed ooerational
oroaram sub;ect to review and aooroval bv the Community
Develooment Deoartment:
C. Said sians shall not result in an increase in the
3
\ 3.-11
allowable sian area for the tvpe of sian in the zone.
except in the c-o zoned areas. in which case.
additional sian area for said sians UP to a maximum of
fiftv sauare feet. mav be allowed:
D. Said sians shall be located on ma;or or collector
streets.
E. Rooftop and monument (around) electronic messaae
board sians are express Iv prohibited:
Failure to complv with any condition of approval shall be
considered arounds for revocation of the approved sian
proaram.
SECTION III: This ordinance shall take effect and be in full
force and effect on the thirtieth day from and after its
adoption.
Presented by
~
Approved as to form by
Robert A. Leiter
Director of Planning
~1vL-vt:..A ~r 9/'/11-
fBruce Boog~ar~
City Attorney
ADDITIONS: XXXXXX
DELETIONS: XXXXXX
4
\ ?;,-/2..
r ' -.----;-' --
F
-=if1r=::11 .. T.
,__~~ -; ~ .... J \~ u...., ",I" -f~ '""'"'
~l ",F" I +.1 ==I, tF:=; . ~
I I' t=. :::Jfo
, :1R~~" ~'.' :j" cc:; o=r~ ~ J..,).. .....
.. ,. ~U,' ,~" ,.i' C,I",~I\, Terrn "U~
~,c";ir~ _ --, H~; i)' ~ " ,X
:.J 1. ~,' "" ".... ~:::::.. ~p imL ~I<l ~:~r "",,'. , ~
t'. l~ ..,~ L-,..,,',,_..~' .. - jL{~. ~ -, . 1-, ,r:@[.,',. I .~
, :: )~ ,_. ~~ . L111!n, - ~
~ u '-.f i'f' -, dC,", wf1 I
~ i, '"llH: .:.'"It iui ~o. 'WN~t-o~" . ,. '-5
. " ~.,: ;b", V . n." ..~1~1'" ,~
....... _ ,= CvrrRE I' . j;
~ _ _ 'ffi'.... '" , ... . -. '--' c..;.;cUU 'f" ":
".0, -;;- :J:;~'~ ;.~ . ;~~ h t'.Jr. -,
. "... _~.. ,._', I ,''';' ,.c =t,~.~ .~ ~~',~ ;l'
0' ..
...... -
~
..,............:.:.:-;...:.:
;l., , ;::; . -'
'-v ~ "', ".D co'.., ::, '::c t ".' 'C' '~ -;; "l
if"': "==.:;" TI':" J.. f, :~," ,; J
."...' 3f:R1'I=I ; :, ,~* ".' cc uu~, ,.n,..C: fT, ~,,~ c;:
j" II' r- . ..... '.. . ,'i " .r. " >-
'~'h'" :~~"'"~".' ~ 1" "'.'.1..' F "~;:'..~..:l:~;~~~ 8j~
"" g"'" ~l~""~ c ~.' ..,,-t{~ -ii
, ,~'.~, .,' ":,,.. I ' :..;':';',: "
__ . ' ' ~ 7l~. -..
~ t' ~",..i:' \ '
~ ~'~~:;~ ~ ~
~
-'-I
~I[
- I
., ,
I
<!
~..
IT
\~'
....
e;..
::l;:Ea R1
~ ~ '
~ / ___ .n' J
E='~j"
-~
,
~~'rP
f:!.
;\-n
:>'t:
~,\ '!" \
1
)
"
LOCATOR
~~I(., ~Iy~ t::oP-
~IVPlt-.l~ e ~~ ~ '.HI ~
\S-/~
_...----------
-~~~- ~
__ .. .~.._7f:_Y._:::--9
-,- .. ~.~ ~
. .~ 9. " , .
.. ~." .~'-- ... ': ' .., .-
......-'",_.,1~1 .
__I"~
"
RESOLUTION NO. PCA-92-01
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL THE ADOPTION OF AN
AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 19.04 DEFINITIONS AND CHAPTER 19.60 TO
ESTABLISH PROCEDURES TO EXPEDITE PROCESSING OF SIGN
PERMIT AND TO ALLOW FOR ELECTRONIC MESSAGE BOARD SIGNS
WHEREAS, on January 28, 1992 the City Council directed that amendments to the
Citis sign regulations to address: 1) modification of the review process for sign permits to
expedite processing; 2) allowance of electronic message board signs in commercially zoned
areas; and 3) allowance of combination sign-murals which exceed the size restrictions for
commercial signs.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission set the time and place for a hearing on said
amendment and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its 'publication
in a newspaper of general circulation in the city at least ten days prior to the hearing, and
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely 7:00
p.m., August 12, 1992 in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning
Commission and said hearing was thereafter closed, and .
~
WHEREAS, the Commission found that the project would have no significant
environmental impacts and adopted the Negative Declaration issued on IS-92-44.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT FROM THE FACTS PRESENTED
AT THE HEARING, THE PLANNING COMMISSION recommends the adoption of
amendments to Title 19 of the Municipal Code as listed in Exhibit A attached hereto and
made a part of.
That a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the City Council.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA,
CALIFORNIA, this 12th day August, 1992 by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Commissioners Ray, Fuller, Casillas, Decker, and Martin
Carson
Tuchscher
J~~~
ATTEST:
~<-Rf;1 7? it::;
Nancy Ri ey, Se e
WPC F:\horno\planning\15.!l2
l~-)~
UNO~~\l~1'I '" n ".r-. ;'Ir"o.l:'lI "....r-
.itra,,""~A~ '.J'..uIU"'W! ~~;.;
EXCERPT FROM PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF 8/12/92
ITEM 6.
PUBLIC HEARING: PCA-92-01: CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENTS
TO THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO ESTABLISH PROCEDURES TO
EXPEDITE PROCESSING OF SIGN PERMITS AND TO ALLOW FOR
ELECTRONIC MESSAGE BOARD SIGNS - City Initiated
Senior Planner Griffm stated this item involved two separate amendment proposals, both
resulting from Council direction. The first proposal was to amend the Code to require the
Zoning Administrator and the Design Review Committee to act on sign permits within certain
limited timeframes and, if the sign permit was denied, it required that the applicant be informed
in writing why the sign was denied and what would need to be done to have an approved sign.
These procedures were designed to accelerate the process, making it more objective for the
applicant to know how to correct an unacceptable situation. Staff recommended approval of the
amendment. The second portion of the proposal was to allow electronic message board signs
in certain limited redevelopment areas and only in certain zones. Using overhead projection,
Mr. Griffin indicated the areas in which the message boards could be allowed and discussed the
procedures and limitations. Mr. Griffm noted the Town Centre Project Area Committee had
voted 7-0 recommending against adopting the amendm;nts citing reasons of aesthetics, fairness
in allowing a 1/2 mile monopoly to one party, and that this amendment could lead to other
requests for similar opportunities in other zones and other areas. Staff, however, recommended
approval of the amendments shown in Exhibit A.
Commissioner Decker asked who determines whether the messages were commercial or non-
commercial. Mr. Griffm answered that it would be determined on a case-by-case basis; the
Director of Community Development would be required to approve the signs, determine whether
or not it was a public service message, and was the ultimate appeal authority.
Commissioner Decker asked if the Community Development Director would also take complaints
as to the appropriateness of the message. Mr. Griffin concurred.
Assistant Planning Director Lee added that being in a redevelopment area, they have disposition
and development agreements. With Council acting as the Agency, they can require that of any
development.
Commissioner Ray asked about the use of the sign during non-business hours. He asked that
language indicate that the public service announcement would have to be in operation 30%
within each hour of operation. Mr. Griffm agreed to this change.
This being the time and the place as advertised, the public hearing was opened.
Mateo R. Camarillo, President, Radio Station KURS, 296 "H" Street, Chula Vista, said they
had approached the City over a year ago with this proposal, and would like to commend the City
for its accessibility. He believed the proposals were appropriate and supported staffs
recommendation. They would be the first Spanish language radio station licensed in the City
of San Diego, and the format would be bilingual.
\~-I$
PC Minutes
August 12, 1992
Chair Casillas asked if Mr. Camarillo agreed to the 30% of every hour being non-commercial.
Mr. Camarillo concurred.
MSUC (DeckerlFuller) 6-0 (Commi"Sioner Tuchscher absent) that based on the Initial Study
and the comments in the Initial Study and the Negative Declaration, rmd that this proposal
will have no significant environmental impacts and adopt the Negative Declaration issued
on IS-92-44.
Commissioner Ray questioned if there was any concern regarding 1/2 mile monopoly. Would
the inability of someone else obtaining the same type of sign prohibit growth in the business
sector? Commissioner Decker felt that even though the limit was 1/2 mile, there was the
possibility that it could be modified.
MS (DeckerlFuller) to recommend that the City Council enact an ordinance amending the
Municipal Code as shown in Exhibit A as attached to the staff report, and as modified.
Commissioner Carson stated she was originally in favor'of the amendment, but after talking with
people in the community, she felt electronic message boards should be on the inside of the
building instead of the outside. She would vote against.
VOTE:
5-1-1 (Commi....ioner Carson against; Commk..ioner Tuchscher absent).
\:s-ib
DRAFT
MINUTES OF THE TOWN CENTRE PROJECT AREA COMMITTEE
OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
August 6, 1992
8:45 AM
Council Conference Room
City Hall
1. Roll Call
Members Present: Chairman Hyde, Vice Chairman Peter;
Members Atlbaum, Blakely, Harper,
Mason, and Ohlau
staff Present:
Principal Community Development
Specialist Pamela R. Buchan,
Senior Planner Steve Griffin,
Community Development Specialist Alisa
Duffey Rogers
2. Approval of Minutes of the Julv 2. 1992
MUSC (Peter/Mason) to approve the minutes of the July 2,
1992 meeting.
REDEVELOPMENT BUSINESS
3. Zonina Amendment Reaardina Electronic Sians
Senior Planner Griffin presented the amendments to the
Municipal Code to establish procedures to expedite
processing of sign permits and to allow for electronic
message board signs. He explained that, according to
the proposed amendment, electronic message board signs
would be allowed in the Town Centre I, Town Centre II,
and Otay Valley Road Redevelopment Areas in C-o, C-C,
and I-L zoned areas. He also stated that 30% of the
messages on the electronic signs would have to be
devoted to community service annoucement. The signs
would only be allowed on major or collector streets. In
addition, one message board sign could be located no
closer than 1/2 mile from another message board sign.
Member Altbaum questioned the allowed dimensions of
electronic message board. Senior Planner Griffin
responded that the boards must conform to the existing
sign criteria for size except in the CO zone where an
additional 50 square feet would be allowed.
Member Mason inquired into why the 1/2 mile restriction
was proposed. Senior Planner Griffin responded that the
restriction was included in order to gradually introduce
the boards into the Project Areas.
\3, -11
Chairman Hyde asked what are the arguments for allowing
electronic message boards. Senior Planner Griffin
replied that it appeared community service messages
would be a public benefit.
Member Altbaum questioned if these boards would be a
traffic hazard. Senior Planner Griffin responded that
the City Traffic Engineer did not believe a traffic
hazard would be caused by these boards.
Chairman Hyde stated that allowing these electronic
message boards would be a quantum step backward in the
City's 20 year effort to rid the City of visual blight
caused by poor quality signs. He further commented that
he believed these boards would be a traffic hazard.
MUSC (Mason/Peter) reviewed and accepted Negative
Declaration 1S-92-44. However, the Committee believes
that a traffic hazard would be caused by the electronic
message boards because the boards would be inherently
unsafe on major thoroughfares.
MUSC (Mason/Peter) The Committee recommends the
disapproval of the proposed amendment to the zoning
code for the following reasons:
1. The proposed amendment is unfair because it
would not allow a business to have an
electronic message board if someone within a
half mile radius already has a sign;
2. Aesthetics. By allowing electronic message
boards, the city would be undermining its 20
year effort to rid the City of the visual
blight caused by poor signage; and,
3. Approval of this sort of amendment would
inevitably lead to a proliferation of requests
for electronic message boards which would have
an adverse effect on the visual character of
the community.
r~~l€"
September 8, 1992
Via:
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
John Goss, City Manager q:'
Bob Leiter, Director of Plannin
To:
From:
Subject:
Item No. 13: Amendment to Planning Commission Recommendation/Resolution
and Implementing Council Ordinance
Due to an oversight, the Planning Commission resolution and Council report and ordinance on
Item No. 13 did not refer to the fact the Planning Commission recommended with respect to
electronic message boards that the proposed ordinance be amended to require that 30% within
each hour of o..peration, rather than overall, be devoted to non-commercial messages. The party
interested in pursuing an electronic message board at the southeast corner of Third Avenue and
"H" Street did not object to this change, and it was staffs intent to amend the proposed
ordinance accordingly.
Consequently, it is the recommendation of the staff and Planning Commission that Ordinance
2529, page 13-11, under Section 19.60.600B, be amended to read" ...thirty percent (30%) Qf
each hour of the time the sign..."
RAL:SG/nr
(lIUIgbd.ord)
/3~J7
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item I Lf
Meeting Date 9/8/92
ITEM TITLE:
PUBLIC HEARING: PCZ-93-A - Consideration to prezone 3.59 acres
north of Otay Lakes Road, east of Lehigh Avenue to R-1 Single Family
Residential - City initiated
SUBMITTED BY:
Ordinance ~S 50
...",-, .1
Director of Planning 1i1"
City Manager .Je-, \\\~~ '\
Approving PCZ-93-A
REVIEWED BY:
(4/5ths Vote: Yes_NoX)
The proposal involves the prezoning of the 3.59-acre Otay Municipal Water District water tank
site located north of Otay Lakes Road and east of Lehigh Avenue to R-1 Single Family
Residential. The site is currently zoned County S87 (Limited Control).
The Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that this action is exempt from
environmental review as a Class 19(a) exemption.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the ordinance approving PCZ-93-A
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: On August 12, 1992, the Planning
Commission voted 6-0 to recommend that Council approve the request in accordance with
Resolution PCA-92-A (one Commissioner absent).
DISCUSSION:
The proposal area consists of a rectangular parcel of land north of Otay Lakes Road and east of
Lehigh A venue. It lies at the northwest comer of the proposed Telegraph Canyon Estates
project area, although outside of the boundaries of that project. The subject parcel is owned by
the Otay Municipal Water District and contains a water tank.
The proposed prezoning and subsequent annexation of this property is a result of a requirement
by LAFCO that this parcel be annexed in conjunction with the annexation of the adjacent
property currently being processed under the project name of Telegraph Canyon Estates. The
annexation of this 3.59 acre parcel in conjunction with that project will preclude the creation of
a County island.
The existing land uses to the west of the subject site are residential, consisting primarily of
detached single-family homes (Southwestern College Estates). The property directly north, east
14 -I
Page 2. Item } Y
Meeting Date 9/8/92
and south of this parcel is included in the proposed Telegraph Canyon Estates project, which
depicts community purpose facilities directly north of this parcel, and detached single family
residential to the east and south.
The proposed prezoning would place the subject property in the R-l residential zone, consistent
with existing westerly adjacent zoning. Existing zoning on this site is S87 (Limited Control)
which is intended to provide limited controls on property pending specific studies for rezoning
(please see attached for a copy of the S87 zone regulations). The R-l zone is also consistent
with the Chula Vista General Plan, which designates the site for Residential Low-Medium (3-6
dwelling units per acre).
The subject site is owned by the Otay Municipal Water District and currently contains a water
tank. While the rezoning of this property would technically create a legal nonconforming use
(public and quasi-public uses require a conditional use permit approved by the City Council, per
Section 19.54.020(M) of the City Municipal Code), the existing water tank would not be affected
except in the case of a proposal for substantial modification to the site, at which time an
application for a conditional use permit could be required.
On July 15, 1992, the Board of Directors of the Otay Water District adopted Resolution No.
3150 consenting to the annexation of the property to the City of Chula Vista (please see
attached). The District does not oppose the prezoning to R-l.
FINDINGS:
The proposed prezoning is consistent with the City of Chula Vista General Plan, and public
necessity, convenience, the general welfare, and good zoning practice support the prezoning to
R-l Single Family Residential.
FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable
(por.>3A.dl3)
ltt ~2
,_......., L....__ "
~ECT
~OGATION
"-- ie~D ~t-lJ J.
~ eqr"'T~? pp.a.J~
;
,
,
~-H-V j
8 "
/''''J
_EXHIBIT A~.J
. '.
<
..
,
.
'.
,
.
.
.
J
,'. .'
, ....
, ,
, ,
...... a4'
. 11//'- III/If)
-.. --
~
aunau
,.
LO.CATOR
m~~ gr,...,y MUNIt.IP~
W.A~ Plt'~t.r ".,ct ~
WAT~ T~I'- 4'IT~ 'J
. .
J
, _L
'" -:;' lit'=- ~~~'--~-T' .---..-" .'
U IS'rP \~ ~tt :_';";'.'; r--, ,,-~'-'UQD L..:H'-
~I . ~.. :. ~~I ::::i'~ ~~ \-JT-;:
f-Il IT - ,b :r;if; ~8fl TIT
.w.- ' III fTTT i-- ~ ~l lIT
J II;~ .. ., ""=~~ '" I- >=
~ gJ 1.......j 1 ~ F- P=
~c t~ c~, ~ = If';;;" .
r t iN '1' ,+ T't,= ;r. h~~
" t n, [j.J ...... S
...J ~ ~,::,c. ,cc ~o--1 ET == =r;r;::oj'
i R ~:= ' ' I~ Ril\Il' ' h .
L1"" ,,~~ I't i u,>CJ1'1'lH""iITr ;; if
" :;-::; ~ ~.I ';,'l''';P ~ ...:...... I . ~r-'f.=i~. \il C ! I ~cf' rI'-
J __.'- I ,11\ <<.~.. u IC p H= .,,' ,~ .'
_u"" . ' I~ ,n ,- "
F . ".-...-.:. If:' 1m ,C~' c-;:: on ::iJ![l"T\""'" ~
,= ". . c ~ . ", ,:'-,7'; " ~
11~!I'R''J:;~:s:y .)c:[c. i 1.:::: ~ ~;tJD " I .l1:'!llI
! ' cU' .. ,:- cL~"\" 'I" r '"
. I '1;1' ilT, .", I, '. ',. C ~ ,=..uL, :.r-" I
_ ,J' ' L"- _ "'" ;;':r IHf-'-':.lT ;;\J-
tt '" "II"'I~. ., '" '!' OWN ~ '-"-,= - .;:! ==\1=
IJ ~ :::.' ~', . ,'CENTRE' I :: t- ; ~
~,~ .~_ ~.". ;? :,~,:,:,,;..,,:, I;; ""'_':::'1, ir' '-.l........jL '-Co=- 1-flRttp:....i.:.~
~ ' ","., "' ,J;.-" n..8' .--'c;d.\'l i.C."'" ,..:
,~ _ .' L I' , ff'''-' ' '
! w ' = .._ ~ '-'"' dl' '..... .,.-. c ':~ " 'i' H 0'
~. , . _ " ty.... _ ~ ',C ,J<-
. ":;!1i\01'f'~'.' . co ~ ""il"p I ~ ,E ~I,,!(-' =-~, -=: ~ 11!!l+
~ '..lilt ,"," ,~ u U'" ,,,,,",, c ,~c,~ ~-
... .VI"" TOWN t! ,~..;= =" - = ,~~ ....",
,;C~NTREII '<,~. .~ i=;V7~,,'!~,.~r':; G
,,""", ...., ' ' p,~_ V"",:' ',~" L
T 'K ,.w",,,,,.,, -= "l' .... ~P'-~-"RO~' ','.'.."". .,,=; , ...., ~
'.' .'m1'(" 't:1 ,:, _,," JEcr-~~ l,-- -,~--'- ~
.~ .,.:;;l;::r-:-, },"~~;e'}1 ~ql1OCArtOj\ti8f-h. ~ .. .~
. cr' '" ." ,jdi"" E" Hmit..~' j. " 7',
RF~ T. ~ .~ ~i f:f1 J~ . ~~~un~! - ' n:~1 ~ '--< ~ I .., E=.-==-~8
t-!l. 'I" nn liS ' -I, == -- ::: ,1
",.. _.. fl<o\ .,.. .... .. ,J.. t ' ",.-'- r~~' ~ ..
, 11" ,.i :,~ f ~ T -,; ~CI:' ;;"'~;"" " ".;:~ ,. 'H
. ,"",~.-ro ,rfi' ,~ ~..., ,",-". ~".
,,'T L ; f] '--EI- ;,' ' L
'Hm' ,";'.L "L'.. . ,~::J.g,: ',;,...L :
l~~' n:=="~C.., '. jT ;:,:t',U:- ~''"'
. L.. .. ~ ",cc.c,.",'. i
_ -. -riJ ~' 1'1' ~~~,;.;~'~ ' I
t :H?,'i,.\.. '
1
I[1J
J~I T."
I ·
t
\~
....
..
"H R1
H111\ I
I-- /
Fe:. J l I,
I,,'
H__ "
ID
I
.~
""~
~.
s
E
~
(
lU>d (
NORTH PM - "1 ;H?!
1
)
'.
LOCATOR
~~Iv ~1~f,J ~
WIVPI~~ (?, ~1" I~.j' ~
-=- -~--
,---~_______~'--,o'.,"":.r,_
-,-._ -:..... ,_... or_
. .~. .. ,
w......^._..__" ' ,-",.
',',",'-'!\'--
_,,__"'U
1
i
(
i
,
~
.
>
.
r
.
~
>
;,
~
.
I
~
;
LOCATOR
6~hJ ~~L- Pl-Af.J
14-~
2870
r
S87
LIMITED CONTROL USE REGULATIONS
2870 INTENT.
The provisions of Section 2870 through Section 2879, inclusive, shall be
known as the S87 Limited Control Use Regulations. The S87 Use Regula-
t ions are intended to prov ide 1 imited control s on the use of property in
portions of the unincorporated area of the County pending specific
studies to enable rezoning of said area in conformance with the CKlopted
General Plan. .
2872 PERMITTED USES.
The following use types are permitted by the S87 Use Regulations:
a. Residential Use Types.
Family Residential
b. Civic Use Types.
Essential Services
r Fire Protect ion Serv ices (see Sect ion 6905)
c. Agricultural Use Types.
Hort iculture (all types)
Tree Crops
Rowand Field Crops
Packing and Processing: Limited
(lImended by Ord. No. 5508 (N.S.) adopted 5-16-79)
(lImended by Ord. ~. 6654 (N.S.) adopted 9-21-83)
(lImended by Ord. No. 6782 (N.S.) adopted 5-16-84)
2873 PERMITTED USES SU8JECT TO LIMITATIONS.
The following use types are permitted by the 587 Use Regulations subject
to the applicable provisions of Section 2980. The number in quotes fol-
lowing the use type refers to the subsection of Section 2980 which
appl ies.
3-85
I '\ --:;;-
--
RESOLUTION NO. 3150
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF THE OTAY WATER DISTRICT CONSENTING TO
THE ANNEXATION OF A PARCEL OF LAND TO
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
(FN 3681/WO 2840)
WHEREAS, the Baldwin Company is developing the Tele-
, ,
graph Canyon Estates Project in the Central Area of the otay
Water District; and
WHEREAS, Baldwin proposes to annex this development to
the city of Chula Vista; and
WHEREAS, the boundaries of this project surround prop-
erty now owned by the Otay Water District where the 624-2
Reservoir and the San Diego county Water Authority No. 9
aqueduct connection are located; and
WHEREAS, LAFCO prohibits annexations which create unin-
corporated islands; and
WHEREAS, Baldwin has requested that the otay Water Dis-
trict consent to the annexation of this parcel to the city
of Chula vista.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Direc-
tors does hereby consent to the annexation of its parcel
containing the 624-2 Reservoir and the San Diego county
Water Authority No. 9 aqueduct connection to the City of
Chula vista.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the General Manager is
authorized to provide written consent to LAFCO indicating
the District's willingness to allow Assessor's Parcel No.
1
/4 -I.a
~~~"'~c~"--.-.-. --_.~-_._.._--- ~._...
--
- ~-.
~.
595-070-05 to be annexed to the city of Chu1a vista's part
of the Telegraph Canyon Estates Annexation.
PASSED, APPROVED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors
of otay Water District at a regular meeting held this 15th
day of July, 1992.
. .
M~
, Vice President
ATTEST:
~~~:.I!:J
14 - \. 2
RESOLUTION PCZ-93-A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THAT CITY COUNCIL PREZONE
3.59 ACRES TO R-l
WHEREAS, the proposed prezoning and subsequent annexation of this property is
required by LAFCO in conjunction with the prezoning and annexation of the adjacent property
currently being processed under the project name of Telegraph Canyon Estates in order to
preclude the creation of a County island, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission set the time and place for a hearing on said
prezoning, application and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its
publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and its mailing to property owners
within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least ten days prior to the hearing,
and
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely 7:00 p.m.,
August 12, 1992, in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning
Commission and said hearing was thereafter closed.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT from the facts presented to the
Planning Commission, the Commission has determined that the prezoning is consistent with the
City of Chu1a Vista General Plan and that public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and
good zoning practice support the prezoning from County S87 (Limited Control) to City R-1
(Single Family Residential).
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION recommends
that the City Council adopt an ordinance to prezone 3.59 acres to R-1 Single Family Residential
as shown on Exhibit A.
And that a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the owners of the property and the
City Council.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA,
CALIFORNIA, this 12th day of August 1992 by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
Commissioners Carson, Casillas, Decker, Fuller, Martin, and Ray
None
Commissioner Tuchscher (excused)
None
~C il~Ch"
Joe . as las, airman
ATTEST:
71-,,-<.,, /2 <.f~L'-<7
Nancy Ripley, Secretary
11.\ .~
UNO~FOC~Al Mn~UTE,S
ITEM 4:
EXCERPT FROM PLANNING COMMISSION MINIITFS OF 8112/92
PUBLIC HEARING: PCZ-93-A: CONSIDERATION TO PREZONE 3.59
ACRES NORm OF OTAY LAKES ROAD, EAST OF LEHIGH AVENUE
TO R-l SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENTIAL - City Initiated
Senior Planner GriffIn explained that with the annexation of Telegraph Canyon Estates, this site
would become a County island. The Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) requires
that before property can be annexed, it must be prezoned. The intent of this prezone is to annex
this property along with the Telegraph Canyon Estates property, so as not to create a County
island. Staff recommended approval based on the fmdings stated in the staff report.
This being the time and the place as advertised, the public hearing was opened. No one wishing
to speak, the public hearing was closed.
MSUC (Fuller/Carson) 6-0 (Cornrni~~ioner Tuchscher absent) that based on the fmdings
that the proposed prezoning is consistent with the City of Chula Vista General Plan, that
the Planning Commission adopt a motion recommending that the City Council prezone 3.5
acres to R-l, as shown in Exhibit A.
[~ -4
fWJ EcT
~OCATION
"'- i~~D 0*IYt'N .../I
~ ~ ~AT~? pp.a.J~
. .
i ~
~
'.
"
,
...,.... ."
I' ........
. ,
, ,
"__ I
...-.~
\
_.__J
?rrY ,?p aUI"A VI&?rA
No. ~p t'T AY t..AK~ RMD
NORTH' (Pi/to"!?-A
,"-.
I
..
.....---
.....--
,.,',",
~ ,': ',' "._~..', .
,.....-:: 'iaIT'LAlCi"
"":'.:';. COMMUNI'Y
. ; ~:: .~,' ::..::~..\t"}.~ ~:;! ~
',.',
--.., .
:.-~'.
. ..' ~
,:;- .
~
..'TL.AICE
,/~
I
LO.CATOR
~U*Je: t'T"AY MUNit.IPAl,..-
WAre~ Plt"m-It.f ., .17.:t ~
WAT~ TJ>.NI'- o/IT~
]
"
..,~
ORDINANCE NO. "';:<5.3D
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING
THE ZONING MAP OR MAPS ESTABLISHED BY SECTION
19.18.010 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE PREZONING
3.59 ACRES NORTH OF OTAY LAKES ROAD EAST OF LEHIGH
AVENUE TO R-l, AND FINDING THAT SUCH ZONING ACTIVITY
IS EXEMPT FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
WHEREAS, property consisting of approximately 3.59 acres located in the County of
San Diego generally located north of Otay Lakes Road and east of Lehigh Avenue, and
diagrammatically presented on the small area map attached hereto as Exhibit A, ("Property") is
currently not within the corporate limits of the City; and,
WHEREAS, the Property is currently owned by the Otay Municipal Water District,
which has adopted a Resolution consenting to the annexation of the property to the City of Chula
Vista; and,
WHEREAS,a duly verified application for a prezoning action was filed with the Planning
Department of the City of Chula Vista on July 6, 1992, by the City of Chula Vista; and,
WHEREAS, said application requested the prezoning of the approximately 3.59 acres
Otay Municipal Water District water tank site as required by the Local Agency Formation
Commission prior to the annexation of the property to the City, and,
WHEREAS, a public hearing by the Planning Commission was held at the time and place
as advertised, namely 7:00 p.m., August 12, 1992, in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth
Avenue, before the Planning Commission and said hearing was thereafter closed, and
WHEREAS, from the facts presented to the Planing Commission, the Commission has
determined that the prezoning is consistent with the City of Chula Vista General Plan and that
public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice support the prezoning
to R-l; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission passed and approved this application on
August 12, 1992.
Ord Re: Prezone of Telegraph Canyon Road Water Tank Site -
September 8, 1992
Page 1
l4:-l~
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby find,
determine, and ordain as follows:
SECTION I: Exempt as Minor Alteration in Land Use.
This particular prezoning activity is an activity exempt from environmental review under
Section 15305 of the CEQA Guidelines on the basis of the fact that the impression of an R-l
zone will constitute a minor alteration in land use inasmuch as the County's pre-existing S87
zoning permits family residential uses as well as various other uses, and inasmuch as the actual
use thereof was and continues to be a less environmentally intense use.
SECTION II: Findings.
The City Council finds that the prezoning is consistent with the City of Chula Vista
General Plan and that public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning practice
support the prezoning to R-1.
SECTION III: Prezoning.
The Property is hereby prezoned Single Family Residential with a 7,000 square foot
minimum parcel size, to wit: R-1.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
Robert A. Leiter
Director of Planning
)vl L "-1'-
/(.,
. Bruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
/7~' L
? ,;;. .-
(pcz93A.ord)
Ord Re: Prezone of Telegraph Canyon Road Water Tank SIte -
September 8, 1992
Page 2
/4;-12.
XXXXXXXXXXXxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXxxxxxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXXXXxXXXXXXXxXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXxXXXXXXXXX)
XXXxxxxxxxxxxxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
5951500100
OTAY LAKES LODG~ INC
P 0 80X 400'
SANTA MUNICA CA 90411
5951630800
kOY ARTHuR A Jk/MARIA
~A 91913
5951631100 59516312uO
~ArLlNKOWSKI ~U('ENE JK/JEANET1...~BST i..bOV,AS UDIAN~ (,
USFK CFC-OP-N #J-3 CHUlA VISTA CA 91913
APO SAN FRANCISCO CA ~6301
5951631500
~k
41913
59516405uO
iOHNSON ~EX
CHUlA VISTA
C/CATHY ..
CA 91913
59516'00800
.:HE~~AN L
CHULA VISTA CA ~1913
59516'00900
kOBERTS NOR.NA R
bONI TA C.. ~190o
x,
x,
'A XX"" ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ "^ ^^ "'^ ^^ f'
X XX X X xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx xx XX:
X xx xx xx xx XXXXXX xx xxxxxxxx XXXX:
X xx XX XX xx xx xX xx xx xx xx XXXX xx XX;,
^^ "",.",..,..... ~.,,""',.......'. .....,..
xx XXXX xx xx xx XX xx xx XXXX X X XX XX,
xx xx XXXX xx XXXX xx xx XXXX XXXXXX,
xx XXXX xx xx xx xx xx xx xX xX XXXX XX,
5950702100
OTAY ~,UNICIPAL wATER DISTRICT
1 05 9 <; J AM AC HA R 0 AD
SPRIN(, VALLEY. CA 92078
5950702200
BALDwIN VISTA ASSOCIAHS l P
C/O BALD"I~ bUILDERS
11975 EL CAMINO REAL #~OO
SAN DIEGU LA 92130
5951630900
~YNTHIA l
CHULA VISTA CA 91913
5951631000
~
CHUlA VISTA LA 91913
5 95 16 31 3"00
~D
~A
J/ JANE B
~1'113
5951031400
WEAV~R FAMILY TRUST U8-01-bC;
CHUlA VISTA LA 91913
5 95 16 '00 60 0
W ON G JA ME S C ~ AD AT HA W
F PO StA TT LE W A 98767
-
5951640700
~ENA S
CHUlA VISTA LA 91913
?'I?11'tU(UU
HARKISON OLIVIA A
~CA '11'113
5951750800
~PH F/MARY L <OVA;
~A 91'113
5951751200
~/MICHA~L S
~A '11913
5951751600
~UOAINA K
~91913
5951.752000
~/COLLEtN L
CHU~A VISTA CA 91913
5951752'100
HOPKINS FAMILY KEVOCAbLt TRUST
it-1l-91 -
CHULA V~A CA '11913
F/WANNA R
CHULA VISTA CA 91913
5'152100500
ANA OIO,OA
-/~YwIA lJ
CHULA VISTA A 91913
5952160900
CHULA VISTA CA 91913
5952101300
ShVITA U
CHULA VISTA CA 3
5952161700
CHULA VISTA CA 91913
?'I? 1 ('tUti UU
~J~ANNIE K
CHULA VISTA CA 91913
5951750900
~RYE
kOCKLlN LA 95677
59517513UO
PANAMA P~ORO/YOLANDA
~ 91913
5951751700
~ J/SUlANNE M
~91913
5951 75~100
~A/LAUkENE E
LHULA VISTA CA 91913
59517525uO
wiTHEM GARy w/PENNY t
~91913
5952160200
MAkTINEI MIGUEL M/GOyCUCHEA-MA
I< N NI
LHULA VISTA LA 91913
J
CHULA VISTA CA 91913
59521610uO
lAVACK MARK O/MCCARTHY KATHLEE
W
ALEXANDRIA VA 22306
59521614uO
~ATRICIA U
LHULA VISTA CA 91913
59521618uO
AROS THOMAS A/MARL A
CHULA V
..913
P/CUNST"NLA B
3
?Y~L.1b"jvU
" S " IN \.
C/u COLWtLL REALTY
IMPE~IAL BEACH CA 4193L
.
595174050C
MARTlt. .dLSERT
CHULA VIS~
L/kEr,A F
91'113
.
.
5951740900
~ST IANI CDNC tPLION
~A 91913
.
. 5951751000
~A
C HU LA V IS T A CA 91'113
.
. 5'i51751'tOU
~IN L/bONNIE
CHULA VISTA CA 91'113
.
. 5951751800
~HENRIETTA R
C HU LA V IS T A CA 91 'il 3
.
. 5951752200
~ RISANORA "
CHULA VISTA 91'113
.
. 5951752bOO
PAR K E k DouC LA 5 U Jo YC E
C hU LA V IS-T A CA '11 '113
.
.
59521 to 30 C
QUINTAS ILDEFONSO ClDGLURES L
CHULA VISTA CA 91913
.
.
5 95~ leD 70C
DIAL SAUL D/~
CHULA VISTA CA 91'113
.
.
595~lcl10o
~ P/JUANNA {',
C HU L A V IS TA CAn '1 11
.
.
.
59517'tUbCO
TH UR I,T UN c.wL
-
CH U L A V 1ST A LA
G/V IR('I ~I A "
91913
5951750700
~S -MVADUR
CHULA ST A LA
V/EOITA L
91913
5951 75 11 00
~M/BETTY J
CHULA VISTA LA 91913
5951751500
~O C/MERCY E
CHULA VISTA \.A 91913
5951751900
~LES H
CHULA VISTA LA 91912
5951152300
~ANUA 1",
~1913
595175i7UO
~E J/StTTY
bONITAS CA 9.9U8
59521b04UO
~kOSY MAR YAt,N
CHULA VI~rL;
L
~~b
S IDAWN M
(HULA VISTA CA 91913
59521b1200
APATAN TOMAS S/MARITtS D
(HULA VISTA CA 9.913
.
~'-/~"lol~OO
~KM
~1~13
.
.
913
.
.
59516 "1 00 0
~ M/JANET M
CHULA VISTA CA 91913
.
.
59516"1400
Me rWllfY RUBtRl LlELlZABUh
C HU L A V I S lAC A ~1 9 U
.
.
5"516"1800
,
J/RAMOl'.A
CHULA VISlA CA 91913
.
.
5 95 16 52700
SCHI'.EIDER MI.X P/DGRUlHY M
CHULA VISTA CA 91913
.
.
5951653100
~E
CHULA VISlA CA 91913
.
.
5951653500
~ABtL 8
~ 91913
.
.
5 9516 53~00
iiNAI'.E MICHAEL
CHULA VISlA CA 9191j
.
.
5951711300
D OR AZ CCLN IC DL AS IE SMER ALUA
CHULA VISTA ~pt91913
.
.
59517..1700
~ONUGh~~K~ARY L
HU L A 91 913
.
5952101000
~ANCHt.TA G
CHULA VISTA LA 91913
5952162000
~'MARIA J
LHULA VIVA C"A 91911
./
59510"1100
O?RSEY MICHAtL
-
CHULA VISTA LA
P/BtVERLY A
91913
5951041500
J~RII'.E
~
~9 51b41900
~UOkl~ J
KAI'.SI.S CITY ~o 6"113
5951052800
FAkR IS REUbEN ~,
CHULA V"," A LA 9!'113
5'151053200
~L
CHULA VISTI. LA '11913
5951053600
f- MUR~ ~YLV lA F
CHULA VISTA CA 91913
5951b54000
DE GuTIERRtZ FREDERIC ~/MAkl
CHULA ~ISTA LI. 9..913
5951711"00
JOhN~ON CHARLE ~ CL lFFOkO/MAR
EL LE r-.
CHULA mrA LA '11913
5951711800
C,R n.ULE UAr-.ltL w/M lCHAtLA K
~9..913
.
5~517Z0200
W HE E Lt: R W I L LI AM LIS JE A NN I:
~91~13
5951730100
Y-'--E Y JOt
CHlJLA VISTA
K/ANNII: J
LA 919 13
.
.
5951730400
~
~
k/RACH"L E
91913
5951730500
NU VA ANTHONY/DIANA K
bONI1A CA ~190
.
.
5951740100
~M
CHULA VISTA CA 91913
5951740200
i?NZA.L.j;Z ~R~NCISCO N/SANDRA
CHULA VIS A LA 91913
I
- -. -- ----.....- -----
5951641200
~O/ANA M R
CHULA VISTA CA 91913
VALERI!: M
CHULA VISTA CA 91913
.
.
5951641bOO
~AN~Y
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
59516417uO
~TO R/RuSA I
~1913
.
.
595..642000
TSUCHJYA riA~ANObU/MISAKu
-C HU ~ A V i s1 A C A "^ 13
59516526UO
~ JR/M!:kC"OES
CHULA VI~TA CA 9..913
.
.
5951652900
CHRISTENSEN ARLoN"
~ED
~23
"
LR"DIT UNI(
5951b530uO
~/RUTH F
~913
.
.
SALVA N
5951b534UO
SAN DIEGG JAPANESE
----
SAN UI"Gu CA 9~lu2
C HR IS TI AN C .
.
5951653700
~LL w/"VoLYN D
~ 91913
59510538uO
~ANM
~b4
.
.
5451654..00
~
~~1~13
59517112uO
~ JR/FI: A
~91913
.
.
595nd500
~KATHY )
~91913
59517U6uO
~AURI:EI>
CHULA VISTA CA 91913
.
.
5951711900
~
CHULA VISTA CA ~1~1~
5951 BOLOU
~S.H LiAVI U 11
C HU LA V 1ST A C A
~1913
595173000u
r VANS W ILbE I\T M/EDNA
CHULA VISTA CA ~191j
59517'10300
FLOCK BENNY D EST Or
~LK
CHULA VISTA CA 91913
CA 91913
../JEANNIt,E M
CA '11913
595<800~OU
M(JNHs SALVADuR R/GUALiALU~E C
CHULA VISTA CA 9~913
5952800700
MUJICA J TO R/EMMA L
CHULA VISTA C.. 91913
5'152801500
BURREBALH DuU~LAS S/PATkIClA,
ChU~ CA 'I191~
~9517201uO
hU(,HES PhIL~JOSEPHINl: C
LHUlA VISTA CA 91913
59517303uO
~/HISAYU
CHULA VISTA CA 91913
59517307UO
~/MARILYN J
CHULA VISTA CA 91913
5951 7'tu't vO
lir-SHIH TE~/YUN(, LI-YUN
CHULA VISTA CA 91913
.
"
.
.
.
.
.
.
59521627UO .
RUURIGUEl kAYMUNU F/EVANC,ELINE
~ -
CHULA VISTA CA 91913
5952163100
~VIC"IL
~ 23455
5952103500
Ak ANUY
C H UL A V
3
~9~2bOU'tUO
~SUNS "ONALD/VERUNICA E
CHuLA VISTA CA 91913
,9520008UO
uE BuD RuNALU ,,/LYNN M
~913
59520012,,0
3
CHULA VISTA LA 9
5952bOlbUO
rUN ~ARUO
LHULA viSTA CA
B/AKMI t
9 rtr3
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
5952805000
PARKER JO~ H/~ONOK ~
~
TAMPA FL 33000
~IA OEL C
j
j
.
595"lc2~OC
GAYLOKO GEORG~ H/CARMEN M
C HU L A V I 5 T A C A ~1 3
.
.
C
.
. 5952103200
N GA JOSE L/8E:ATRIC~
C HU L A V .;
.
. 59528 CO 100
Y WOIEL S/HARlJMI N
C HU L A V IS A A 91913
.
.
5't5280050C
~A PAuL E/A~DKEA L
CT
C HU L A V 1ST A A 9 1 ,,1 3
.
.
595280090C
MORISHITA RUBIN Y/COLLEEN C
~1913
.
.
THLE EN 8
C HU L A V 1ST A C A 'i 1 913
.
.
AKY J
CA <)1<)13
.
~95211055()0
~JK/~,AKIA L
~
.
.
5952dO 59uO
, NE R lCHAKD D
CHULA
.
3
.
.
.
5952162500
~I/MARvARET "
~913
5952162900
~i:IUIK
~ 23000
5952163300
CHULA VISTA LA 91913
5952,,00200
&-CABA J+F/MARIA
CHULA VISTA CA 91~13
C P
5952800600
OUERRERO JuS. L/~AOOALcNA
CHuLA VI~A CA 91915
5952801000
iE ON I JUAN
CHULA VISTA CA 91913
59 52bO 1~00
~ KYU-W-UN J
~A VISTA LA 91!l3
,
~... ':.
. 5 ~5Z8 01 700
A
91913
.
. 5'152805200
S ~,ARCUS P/DIANE L
C HU l A V I A CA 3
.
. 595,805bOO
P R OOER P IHRUYO
C HUL A V IS 3
.
. 59528 (;bOOO
M Z LUI S e/LI ND A 0
C HU L A V I ~
.
5952b04900
R I CO A ~ A B
CH ULA V 151 A
LA 91~
:u
'II J
5952b05300
k ~AlLAS E/HcLcN C
CHUlA VISTA
3
5952b05700
RN ~RcOURY w/~ALE M