HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 1992/07/28
Tuesday, July 28, 1992
6:00 p.m.
.'t c1edam uhder penalty of perjury that I mi\
employed by the City of Chula Vista in the
Office of the City Clerk and that I posted
this Agenda/Notice on the Bulletin Board at
the Public ervices Building ~t ~ Hall on
DATED, ) '2..'-/!Q4 SIGNED . ~ ..
Council Chambers
Public Services Building
ReS(Ular MeetinS[ of the City of Chula Vista City Council
CAll. TO ORDER
1.
ROll CAlL:
Councilmembers Grasser Horton _, Malcolm -' Moore -' Rindone _, and
Mayor Nader _'
2. PLEDGE OP ALI..EGIANCE TO THE FLAG. SILENT PRAYER
3. APPROVAL OP MINUTES: June 30,1992 (Joint CouncillRDA) and July 6,1992
4. SPECIAL ORDERS OP THE DAY:
a. Proclaiming Tuesday, August 4, 1992, as "National Night Out Day". The proclamation will
be presented to Mary Jane Diosado, Senior Crime Prevention Specialist, who will accept on
behalf of the Police Department's Crime Prevention Program.
CONSENT CALENDAR
(Items 5 through 11)
The staff recommendations regarding the following items listed under the Consent CaIendJJr will be enm:ted by the
Council by one motion without discussion unless a Couru:iImember, a member of the public or City staff requms
that the item be pulled for discussion. If you wish to speok on one of these items, please fill out a .&quest to
SpeIlk Form. avai/oble in the lobby and submit it to the City C/ok prior to the meeting. (Complete the green form
to speok in favor of the staff recommendation; complete the pink form to speok in opposition to the staff
recommendation.) Items pulled from the C01ISent Calendor will be discussed after Action Items and Boards and
Commission R=nnmendiltions. Items pulled by the public will be the first items of business.
5. WR.lTfEN COMMUNICATIONS:
a. Letter requesting support of provision in AB2409 to add Section 1463.007 to the Penal Code
regarding implementation of a comprehensive program to identify and collect delinquent
fines and forfeitures. George P. Bailey, Supervisor, Second District, Chairman, San Diego
Counry Board of Supervisors, 1600 Pacific Highway, Room 335, San Diego, CA 92101.
b. Letter requesting support of modifications to the existing pursuit policies of the Border
Patrol. Patricia H. Birdsall, Mayor, Ciry of Temecula, 43174 Business Park Drive, Temecula,
CA 92590.
c. Claims Against the City: Claimant No.1 and No.2 - Maria Burlaza and Edna Burlaza, clo
Milberg & DePhillips, Attorneys at Law, 225 Broadway, Suite 1313, San Diego, CA 92101;
Claimant No. 3 and No.4 - Maria Sosa and Roxana Sosa, cia Milberg & DePhillips,
Attorneys at Law, 225 Broadway, Suite 1313, San Diego, CA 92101. It is the
recommendation of the City's claims adjustors, Carl Warren & Company, and Risk
Management staff that the claims be denied.
Agenda
-2-
July 28, 1992
d. Letter of resignation from the Montgomery Planning Committee - Lee Wheeland. It is
recommended that Mr. Wheeland's resignation be accepted with regret and a letter of
appreciation be sent.
6. ORDINANCE 2524 AMENDING SECTION 2.30.020 OF TIlE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO
MEMBERSHIP ON TIlE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION (EDC)
(second readinl!: and adoDtion) - On 10/9/90, Council amended Sections
2.30.020 and 2.30.060 to expand EDC membership from seven to nine
commissioners. The recommended ordinance is being proposed by the
Economic Development Commission and provides language outlining
specific areas of expertise which should be drawn from in Council's
selection of appointees. The purpose is to encourage a well balanced
membership representing expertise vital to the EDCs role in developing,
recommending, and implementing economic development strategies. Staff
recommends Council place ordinance on second reading and adoption.
(Director of Community Development)
7. RESOLUTION 16726 APPROVING TIlE AMENDMENT TO TIlE AGREEMENT Willi OTAY RIO
BUSINESS PARK FOR TIlE SALE OF PROPERTY FOR A NEW CITY
CORPORATION YARD AND AUTIiORIZING TIlE MAYOR TO EXECUTE
SAME - On 6/30/92, Council adopted Resolution No. 16655 approving an
agreement to purchase land from Otay Rio Business Park for a new City
COrPorate yard. The agreement contained specific dates for the completion
of conditions set forth in the agreement; however, the execution of the
agreement was delayed until 7/15/92, which prevented the completion of
the escrow and inspection of the property by the City. Accordingly, the
City has revised the agreement to reflect the proper dates for executing its
terms. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (City Attorney)
8. RESOLUTION 16727 AUTIiORIZING TIlE DESTRUCTION OF POllCE DEPARTMENT
BACKGROUND RECORDS. The department is requesting authorization to
destruct outdated background files of persons who were not hired. The
pUrPose is for the conservation of storage space. The destruction conforms
with the records retention policy. Staff recommends approval of the
resolution. (Chief of Police)
9. RESOLUTION 16728 APPROVING AN INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENTWIlli ROHR, INC., FOR
"NATIONAL NIGHT OUT' EVENT - The "National Night Out" event will be
utilizing a portion of the Rohr, Inc. parking lot. Staff received
correspondence indicating an Indemnification Agreement was required. A
similar agreement was approved last week with the San Diego Unified Port
District. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Chief of Police)
lOA RESOLUTION 16716 ORDERING CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS IN PROCEEDINGS AND
ASSESSMENTS IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NUMBER 90-1 (SALT CREEK
I) - On 10/22/91, Council established Assessment District Number 90-1
(Salt Creek l) and levied assessments for the acquisition and fmancing of
certain infrastructure improvements serving the Salt Creek I development
pursuant to the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913. The improvements
have now been completed, and it is necessary that the proceedings be
finalized and the 1915 Act bonds be sold to provide the funds for the
improvement acquisition. Staff recommends approval of the resolutions.
(Director of Public Works) Continued from 7/21/92 meeting.
Agenda
-3-
July 28, 1992
B. RESOumON 16717 AUTIlORIZING CERTAIN ASSESSMENT DISTRICf BONDS TO BE SOID AT
A PUBUC SALE AND DIRECI1NG A CALL FOR SEALED BIDS IN
ASSESSMENT DISTRICf NUMBER 90-1 (SALT CREEK I)
11. RESOLImON 16729 AU.OWING THE CLOSURE OF THIRD AVENUE FROM"E" TO "G" STREETS
IN ORDER TO CONDUCf A CRAFT FESTIVAL ON AUGUST 23, 1992,
AU.OWING THE WAIVING OF THE SIDEWALK SALES ORDINANCE, AND
APPROVING WAIVER OF THE BUSINESS UCENSE FEES FOR THE TIiIRD
AVENUE FESTIVAL . The Chula Vista Downtown Business Association is
requesting permission to close Third Avenue between "E" and "G" Streets
in order to conduct the Third Avenue Festival on Sunday, August 23, 1992,
from 10 AM to 6 PM. The festivities for the event will include live
entertainment along with a children's amusement park, community
activities, and 270 arts, crafts, and food booths. Staff recommends
approval of the resolution. (Director of Community Development)
. . END OF CONSENT CALENDAR. .
PUBUC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLImONS AND ORDINANCES
The following iJems hIlve been advertised and/m posted as publiJ: hemin&, as required by 1JJw. If you wish to speak
to any item, p/eIlse fill out the "llt!tpust to Speok Farm" available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior
to the meeting. (Complete the green farm to speak infavm of the staffrecomnt/!tVJJJt complete the pinkfarm
to speak in opposition to the staff recommendalion.) Comnrmts are limited to five minuta per individullL
12.
PUBUC HEARING
13.
PUBUC HEARING
ORDINANCE 2525
PCC-92-40 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: APPEAL OF PLANNING
COMMISSION APPROVAL OF A REQUEST TO CONSTRUCf INTERIM FIRE
STATION NUMBER SIX AT THE SOUlliWEST CORNER OF LANE AVENUE
AND FENTON STREET; APPE.U.ANT - CALIFORNIA LAND ASSOCIATES -
The appeal is of the Planning Commission approval of PCC-92-40, the
application by the City to construct an interim fire station at the southwest
comer of Fenton Street and Lane Avenue, 2396 Fenton Street. (Director
of Planning) Staff recommends continuation to the meeting of 8/4/92.
PCZ-92-C: CONSIDERATION OF ZONING WESTERLY SHORE OF LOWER
OTAY LAKE TO A-l00 - CITY OF CHULA VISTA - At the time the City
adopted the EastLake III General Development Plan (GDP) and the Olympic
Training Center (OTC) SPA Plan and prezoning, the area east of Wueste
Road was intended to remain unincorporated and under County
jurisdiction. When LAFCO approved the OTC annexation, however, they
extended the boundary to the shoreline of Lower Otay Lake in order to
create logical service boundaries. The action added the area to Chula
Vista's corporate limits, but left the property without zoning. The zoning
action precedes consideration of the OTC Boathouse Conditional Use
Permit (CUP). Staff recommends Council place ordinance on first reading.
(Director of Planning)
ZONING CERTAIN DESIGNATED PROPERTY ON THE WESTERLY SHORE
OF LOWER OTAY LAKE AS AGRICULTUR.AlrI00, AND FINDING THAT
SUCH ZONING AcrIVITYIS EXEMPT FROM THE REQUIREMENTS OF THE
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUAlJTY ACf (first readin~)
Agenda
-4-
July 28, 1992
14.A. REPORT CONSIDERATION OF 1HE FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL E1RFOR 1HE OLYMPIC
TRAINING CENTER BOAlHOUSE, E1R-90-12 - This report provides
background regarding the certification of final EIR on the OTC Boathouse,
Mitigation Monitoring, and review of Environmental Impacts and
Mitigation. Staff recommends certification of the report. (Director of
Planning) Not Part of the public hearinl!:. but a related item.
B. PUBUC HEARING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PCC-92-04: REQUEST TO ESTABUSH
OLYMPIC TRAINING CENTER (OTe) BOAlHOUSE ON WESTERLY SHORE
OF LOWER OTAY LAKE - SAN DIEGO NATIONAL SPORTS TRAINING
FOUNDATION - The request is to establish the OTC Boathouse facility on
3.7 acres on the westerly shore of Lower Otay Lake, directly east of the
main 150 acre OTC site. The facility would provide year-round training of
international class American athletes in canoeing, kayaking, and rowing.
Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Planning)
C. RESOLUTION 16730 APPROVING PCC-92-C AND CERTIFYING E1R-90-12 - CONDmONAL USE
PERMIT PERMITTING 1HE USE OF CERTAIN DESIGNATED PROPERTY AS
OLYMPIC TRAINING CENTER BOAlHOUSE - ON CERTAIN DESIGNATED
CONDmONS, CERTIFYING 1HE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT NO. 9O-12,AND MAKING CERTAIN CEQAFINDINGS, APPROVING
AND ADOPTING 1HE MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM AND
STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FOR 1HE OLYMPIC
TRAINING CENTER BOAlHOUSE.
15. PUBUC HEARING CONSIDERATION OF A PRECISE PLAN DRC-92-31 AND TENTATIVE
SUBDMSION MAP, CHULA VISTA TRACT PCS-92-01, FOR DATE-PALM
VIU.AS - APPUCANT: T. DAVID EYRES - The request is to develop a 1S-lot
subdivision consisting offourteen dwellings on 1.98 acres, located between
Date Street and Palm Avenue in R-1-S-P Zoning District. Staff recommends
approval of the resolution. (Director of Planning)
A. RESOLUTION 16731 APPROVING 1HE PRECISE PLAN APPUCATION FOR DATE-PALM VIU.AS,
DRC-92-31
B. RESOLUTION 16732 APPROVING 1HE TENTATIVE SUBDMSION MAP FOR DATE-PALM
VIlLAS, CHULA VISTA TRACT PCS-92-01
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
This is an opportuniJy for the general publU: to address the CiIy Council 011 any subject 1tUItteT within the Council's
jurisdkJion that is not an item 011 this agenda. (Stole law, however, generally prohibits the City Council from
taking action 011 any issues not im;luded 011 the posted agenda.) If you wish to address the Council 011 sud& a
subject, please complete the ye110w "Request to Speok Under Oral CommunU;ations Form" available in the lobby
and submit it to the CiIy Clerk prior to the meeting. Those who wish to speak, p/elJse give your 1UJnIe and address
for record purposes and follow up action. Your time is limited to three minutes per speoker.
ACTION ITEMS
The items 1isted in this section of the agenda are erpedI!d to e1U:it substonJial discussions and deliberotions by the
Council, staff, or members of the general pub1U:. The items will be con.sidereLl indiviJJuaIJy by the Council and staff
recommendotions may in certoin cases be presented in the alJenultive. Those who wish to speak, please fill out
a "Request to Speok" form available in the lobby and submit it to the CiIy Clerk prior to the meeting. PublU:
commems are limited to five minutes.
Agenda
-5-
July 28,1992
16. RESOLlmON 16719 APPROVING RATE SOiEDULES FOR COllECfiON AND DISPOSAL OF
REFUSE EFFECTIVE JULY 1,1992 - Since 1986, Laidlaw Waste Systems,
in accordance with the Franchise Ordinance, has been entitled to request
an annual rate increase for the collection and disposal of refuse. The staff
report recommends approval of a proposed rate increase and discusses
related issues. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of
Finance) Continued from 7/21/92 meeting.
17. REPORT CONSIDERATION OF CREATING AOIDLA VISTA HOUSING AUTHORTIY-
The Council has asked for a report on the desirability of creating a Chula
Vista Housing Authority under State law. Currently, affordable housing in
Chula Vista is pursued through a combination of activities by the
Community Development Department and the County Housing Authority.
Council requested an analysis of the benefits of consolidating those efforts
under a Local Housing Authority. Staff recommends Council accept the
report. (Director of Community Development)
18. REPORT EVALUATING TIlE POSSffiILITY AND FEASIBILITY OF PAVING OR
CLOSING THREE DIRT ALLEYS - ELM AVENUE AND TWO ADJACENT
ALLEYS EAST OF SECOND AVENUE, BE'lWEEN MADRONA STREET AND
"F" STREET - On 7/8/91, the City received written communication from
property owners on Madrona Street, Cypress Street, and Minot Avenue
expressing road safety concerns and suggesting solutions to their concerns.
The property owners requested that the City consider paving or closing
three dirt alleys - Elm Avenue and two adjacent alleys east of Second
Avenue, between Madrona Street and "F" Street. Said request was
submitted to the City in the form of a petition and signed by twenty-four
residents. Staff recommends Council accept the report. (Director of Public
Works)
19. REPORT OXFORD STREET AND FIRST AVENUE - In a letter dated on 10/24/91,
Pamela R. Wiser of the 100 block of Oxford Street, requested that stop
signs be installed on Oxford Street at First Avenue to reduce vehicular
speeds on Oxford Street. On 12112191, Council approved lowering the
speed limit on Oxford Street to 30 MPH and have staff return in six months
on the effectiveness of the speed limit change. Staff recommends Council
accept the report, keep the speed limit at 30 MPH, and deny the request
for stop signs on Oxford Street at the intersection with First Avenue.
(Director of Public Works)
20. REPORT TRAFFIC CONCERNS FOR SECOND AVENUE NORTH OF "E" STREET -
Staff has received several requests to install all-way stops on Second
Avenue at the intersections of "C" Street, 100 block of "0" Street, and 200
block of "0" Street to control vehicular speeds in the area and improve
pedestrian safety. Staff recommends Council accept the report and deny
the requests for all-way stops. (Director of Public Works)
Agenda
-6-
July 28, 1992
DISPOsmON OF SPACE IN TIIE INFORMATION AND REFERRAL CENTER
AT MEMORIAL PARK - On 3/17/92, staff presented a report regarding the
issues involved in the disposition of space at the Information and Referral
Center. Council directed staff to return with a follow-up report after
additional discussions with the Library Board of Trustees, the Parks and
Recreation Commission, the Downtown Business Association, the Chamber
of Commerce, and a representative of the Chula Vista Historical Society.
Council also requested that other alternative uses be considered for the
building. Staff recommends Council accept the report and support using
the Information and Referral Center is utilized as a Historical Museum and
office area for the Downtown Business Association. (Director of Parks and
Recreation, Library Director, and Director of Community Development)
21.
REPORT
BOARD AND COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
TIUs is the time the City Coundl wiD consider items which luwe been fOlWorded to them for consideration by one
of the City's Boords, Commissions ond/or CommiJtees.
22.
REPORT
FORWARDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR CHARTER AMENDMENTS - At
its meeting of 2/25/92, Council determined to place an item on the June
1992 ballot relating to runoff elections and determined to defer
consideration of the other Charter Review Commission-recommended ballot
items until some later date prior to the November 1992 ballot. The
Commission re-presents two of those prior recommendations (Sections 304
and 305), three revised prior recommendations (Sections 303, 602 and
1009), and three new recommendations (Sections 300, 600, and 1009) for
Council's consideration for placement on the November 1992 ballot. The
actual ballot language is found in the companion Election Resolution
presented by the City Clerk and City Attorney. (Robert Campbell,
Chairperson, Charter Review Commission)
ITEMS pUIJ.ED FROM TIIE CONSENT CALENDAR
TIUs is the time the City Coundl wiD discuss items which luwe been removed from the Consent CiJJendm. Agenda
items pulled at the request of the public wiD be considered prior to those pulled by Cowu:iJmembers. Public
conutII!1Its are limited to five minutes per individuaL
OTHER BUSINESS
23. CI1Y MANAGER'S REPORTfS)
a. Scheduling of meetings.
b. Hiring Freeze.
Agenda
-7-
July 28, 1992
24. MAYOR'S REPORTCS)
a. Minutes and/or taping of Closed Sessions.
b. Procedure for Reappointment - Board of Ethics. Continued from 7121192 meeting.
c. Routine notice and opportunity for assessed property owners to review proposed contracts
for work related to Otay Valley Road widening before they are let. Continued form 7121192
meeting.
d. Subcommittee for Port of San Diego/City of Chula Vista Bayfront.
e. Ratification of appointment to Town Centre Project Area Committee: Michael Steiner.
25. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilman Moore:
a. Discussion and/or action regarding renaming of Otay Lakes Road (east/west section) due
to near future increase in patients, visitors, golfers, and educators to new facilities being
constructed in the east. The main access is "L" Street, Telegraph Canyon Road, and Otay
Lakes Road, which are one and the same. It is most appropriate to review this subject
before new street signs are installed and major advertising is printed. Continued from
7121192 meeting.
b. Correspondence to Legislature leadership regarding State budget.
Councilman Rindone:
c. Update report by Rodriquez Airport Administrator regarding Mexico's Airport Expansion
plans. Continued from 7121192 meeting.
d. Request from Mayor for report on trip to Mexico City.
Councilman Malcolm:
e. Closed session - Personnel.
ADJOURNMENT
The City Council will meet in a closed session immediately following the Council meeting to discuss:
Potential litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 - City of Chula Vista vs. Otay
Municipal Water District.
Potential litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 - City of Chula Vista vs. EDCO
and Bay Cities.
The meeting will adjourn to (a closed session and thence to) a Joint Meeting with the Board of Supervisors
on July 30,1992 at 3:00 p.m. in the County Administration Center, Board Chambers, 1600 Pacific Highway,
San Diego, thence to the Regular City Council Meeting on August 4, 1992 at 4:00 p.m. in the City Council
Chambers.
A Special City Council/Redevelopment Agency meeting will be held immediately following the City Council
meeting.
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item ~
.
Meeting Date 7/28/92
ITEM TITLE
-.Proclamation ----- Declaring Tuesday, August 4th, 1992,
as "National Night Out Day" in the City of Chula Vista.
SUBMITTED BY
Mayor Nader
DISCUSSION:
On Tuesday August 4, 1992, the Police Department will hold the ninth annual "National Night
Out" event at Bayside Park. The event will include demonstrations, live entertainment, display
booths and refreshments. A 5K Fun Run and 2 Mile Walk are also planned. The purpose of
this event is to promote crime prevention and community spirit while strengthening police-
community relations.
A Proclamation declaring Tuesday, August 4th, 1992 as "National Night Out Day" in Chula
Vista will be presented by Mayor Nader to Mary Jane Diosado, Senior Crime Prevention
Specialist, who will accept the Proclamation on 1)ehalf of the Police Department's Crime
Prevention Program.
~
'let - /
,
.
..
~r~~:~Jl~
I c/n.cou;:;",-....]
CU' It '" ~" ~ \:"II.i~
..'....- .,.. ~\'j'T. C.il
~. , " '- - ..... !.':!..-... .....u.-.......
GEORGE F. BAILEY
.UNRV1SOft, SECOND DlSTIaCT
CHAIRMAN
PH DllEOO COUt4TY BDA"D CW IJUNftVlIIOIttI
July 10, 1992
The Honorable Tim Nader
Mayor
City of Chula Vista
P.O. Box 1087
Chula Visia, CA 91912
Dear Mayor t/.ad:er
On February 28, 1992, the San Diego County Board of Supervisors requested that
you and your fellow council members convey to our delegation and other
legislators your support for the County's efforts to have legislation enacted
regarding implementation of a comprehensive program to identify and collect
delinquent fines and forfeitures.
As you may recall, the proposal would permit a county to retain from the
collected revenues an amount sufficient to offset the cost of the enhanced
collection effort. If counties are permitted to recover these costs, both the
State and cities of our region would receive monies which otherwise would not
have been collected.
Assembly Bill 2409 (Isenberg), as amended July 1, 1992, includes the County's
legislative proposal. A copy of the language as drafted by the Assembly
Judiciary Committee is attached.
Proposed reductions in State funding for court operations make recovery of
costs for the enhanced collection of delinquent fines and forfeitures even
mOre important. The budget bill currently reflects a $100 million reduction
in funding to counties for Trial Court Funding. The budget subcommittee has
since adopted a recommendation to reduce Trial Court Funding by another $56
million. If this proposal is enacted, the County will receive approximately
$12 million less this year to fund court operations.
~~ \',~CC\\
V\...\~"\
rj,'1
~,~~'\ ,v C<.\
~)v'-.. \\-l Y\ I\r-' \' lCowN'n" ACtMJNIMllATION CICNftJI 1 eoo "'ACll'1e HIGHWAY' ftOOM 338 SAN DIEGO, CALJII'OItNlA 82101 (151.1. U' ."",e
\~~ ~ <'!-c ;~", c7",,- ...CA.IOHomcE._.......IlMf:T.SUIT..........CAJON.CA..020.'..Ol..'....' ~_/
w~~rr~~~ C\~MI^UNICATIONS
,
Mayors
July 10, 1992
Page 2
We need letters from Mayors and City Council Members to our delegation members
and Assembly Member Isenberg in support of the provision in AB2409 to add
Section 1463.007 to the Penal Code. This provision is part of the overall
budget negotiations, so time is of the essence. Please join us today in this
effort.
Sincerely,
Ge~~aileY
Chairman
San Diego County Board of Supervisors
GFB:dw
Attachment
~-~
"' .
AI 2409 (Isenberg) -- Trial Court Funding
As amended July 1. 1992
SEC. 9.5. SECTION 1463.007 IS ADDED TO THE PENAL CODE, TO READ:
1463.007. NOTWITHSTANDING ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW, ANY COUNTY OR COURT THAT
IMPLEMENTS OR HAS IMPLEMENTED A COMPREHENSIVE PROGRAM TO IDENTIFY AND COLLECT FINES AND
FORFEITURES WHICH HAVE NOT BEEN PAID AFTER 60 DAYS FROM THE DATE ON WHICH THEY WERE DUE
AND PAYABLE, WITH OR WITHOUT WARRANT HAVING BEEN ISSUED AGAINST THE ALLEGED VIOLATOR,
WHICH ARE NOT BEING PAID THROUGH TIME PAYMENTS AND FOR WHICH THE BASE FINE EXCLUDING
STATE AND COUNTY PENALTIES IS AT LEAST ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($100), MAY DEDUCT AND
DEPOSIT IN THE COUNTY TREASURY THE COST OF OPERATING THAT PROGRAM, FROM ANY REVENUES
COLLECTED THEREBY PRIOR TO MAKING ANY DISTRIBUTION OF REVENUES TO OTHER GOVERNMENTAL
ENTITIES REQUIRED BY ANY OTHER PROVISION OF LAW. FOR PURPOSES OF THIS SECTION, A
COMPREHENSIVE COLLECTION PROGRAM SHALL BE A SEPARATE AND DISTINCT REVENUE COLLECTION
ACTIVITY AND SHALL INCLUDE AT LEAST 10 OF THE FOLLOWING COMPONENTS:
(A) MONTHLY BILL STATEMENTS TO ALL DEBTORS.
(B) TELEPHONE CONTACT WITH DELINQUENT DEBTORS TO APPRISE THEM OF THEIR FAILURE
TO MEET PAYMENT OBLIGATIONS.
(C) ISSUANCE OF WARNING LETTERS TO ADVISE DELINQUENT DEBTORS OF AN
OUTSTANDING OBLIGATION.
(D) REQUESTS FOR CREDIT REPORTS TO ASSIST IN LOCATING DELINQUENT DEBTORS.
(E) ACCESS TO EMPLOYMENT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT EMPLOYMENT AND WAGE
INFORMATION.
(F) THE GENERATION OF MONTHLY DELINQUENT REPORTS.
(G) PARTICIPATION IN THE FRANCHISE TAX BOARD'S TAX INTERCEPT PROGRAM.
(H) THE USE OF DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLE INFORMATION TO LOCATE DELINQUENT
DEBTORS.
(I) THE USE OF WAGE AND BANK ACCOUNT GARNISHMENTS.
(J) THE IMPOSITION OF LIENS ON REAL PROPERTY AND PROCEEDS FROM THE SALE OF
REAL PROPERTY HELD BY A TITLE COMPANY.
(K) THE FILING OF OBJECTIONS TO THE INCLUSION OF OUTSTANDING FINES AND
FORFEITURES IN BANKRUPTCY PROCEEDINGS.
(L) COORDINATION WITH THE PROBATION DEPARTMENT TO LOCATE DEBTORS WHO MAY BE ON
FORMAL OR INFORMAL PROBATION. -
(M) THE INITIATION OF DRIVERS' LICENSE SUSPENSION ACTIONS WHERE APPROPRIATE.
(N) THE CAPABILITY TO ACCEPT CREDIT CARD PAYMENTS.
ANY COUNTY THAT EXERCISES THE AUTHORITY GRANTED IN THIS SECTION FOR THE PURPOSE
OF ENHANCING ITS REVENUE COLLECTIONS SHALL FILE AN ANNUAL REPORT OF ITS ACTIVITIES WITH
THE LEGISLATURE.
THIS SECTION SHALL BE REPEALED ON JUNE 30, 1994, UNLESS A LATER ENACTED STATUTE,
WHICH IS ENACTED BEFORE JUNE 30, 1994, DELETES OR EXTENDS THAT DATE.
~'3
SENT BY: XEROX Telecopier 7017; 7-21-92
9:29
6197422069"
425 6164;# 4/ 4
I'alrlI:lll H. B1rdJall
Mayer
Karel F. L1ndemans
Ma)OI" Pm 1l!m
Ronald J. Parks
Coundlmember
Peg Moont
Councilmember
J. Sal Mufloz
Councilmember
Ci~ of Temecula
'1317'1 Business Park DrM! . ~mecula. CaUromla 92590
July 20, 1892
The Honorable Tim Nader
Mayor
City of Chula YlSta
276 FOul1h Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 9'910
Dear Mayor Nad.r:
As you are aware. on Jun. 2, 1992 . tragedy ocourred in Temecula IS a rHult of
I high sp..d pursuit of Hlagal an.ns. Be_ of the concerns of 1IIe community,
we h.... teken sn active roll In requeetlng a modlf1cat1on to the ..ting pursuit
pollclee of the Border Pstrol. M a result of our .ctions. the City of TClmecu18 hH
been invited to tutify before the CoIlgmslonal Subcommittea on Government
Informetion. Justice Ind Agriculture on July 30, 1992.
A second Congreeelonel Merlng de8ling with Border Pstrol mau.rs will take placa
before the Hou.. Subcommittee an International Law, Immlgretlon. and Refugee,
on AUQuIt II. I hBve "ked to te,tify st thet heering e, wen.
I would .ncourllg' your ellty to aubmlt e letter of IUPPort to our City Attorney who
ie preparing our testimony. It', our belief that the Border Patrol needa to have en
urban pursuit polley which would modify their current operation. within our
geogrep/lic .re..
We haVl ..nt tne attached letter to your City Maneger for coordlnltlon Ind
fonow-up. If you have Iny question.. pie.. do n01 hHltatB to call me or our City
Manager. Davkl F. Dixon. at 17141894-1988.
rlcerelY. ,
~ yU):~ \~~.J...Q
Psulcle .I'r'ltsall
Mayor
David F. Dixon
City Manager
171'l} 69'1-1989
AAX (71'l) 694-1999
PHB:88
Attachment
cc: Mr. John Goff
~~~ l~) .
~~ ~ WRITTEN COMMUNSCA liONS
~~~.__.__.._- 5.b-j
SENT BY: XEROX Telecopier 70'7; 7-2'-92
9:26
6'97422069~
425 6'64;# 2/ 4
C I T Y
o f
T E M E C U L A
July 20, 1992
Mr. John Goff
City Manager
City of Chula VIsta
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Re: Congressional Border Patrol Hearings
Dear Mr. Goff:
On July 30. 1992, the United Stetes House of Representatives' Commlnee
on Government Operetlons, Subcommittee on Government Information,
Justice and Agriculture, will be holding hearings on the Immigration and
Naturalization Service'. (INS) Border Patrol million in urban areas. The
hearings will focus on high speed pursuits by Border Patrol egents and the
location and continued operation of the Temecula and San Clemente Border
Patrol Checkpoints.
The impetus for these hearings was a June 2, 1992 accident In the City of
Temecula which killed 5 Innocent residents of the City. including 4 high
school students.
The City of Temacula will provide both written and oral testimony to the
Subcommittee. The focus of the City'. testimony will be the need for
subatentlal changes In the INS Border Patrol pursuit policy to reflect the needs
of the rapidly urbanizing Southern California community. The City will stress
the need for a pursuit policy which addreues:
. the speCifiC circumstances under which a pursuit should be
underteken or terminated:
45174 8U$1NESSP..~1)1ll'"' T!MI!cuu.CALlF()IlllL&92590 . PHO."(714)8Q4.tgag. F.u1714l15V4-IM
5b-3
SENT BY: XEROX Telecopier 7017; 7-21-92
9:28
8197422089"
425 8184,# 3/ 4
Mr. John Goff
July 20. 1992
Page 4
. expanded coordination and communications with local
governments: and
. the continued validity and location of the checkpoint system.
A'sscond Congressional hearing dealing with Border Patrol matters will take
place before the House Subcommittee on If.1tarnatlonal Law, Immigretlon, and
Refugees on August 5. We have asked to testify at this hearing as well.
We urge you to make available to the Subcommittees your written comments
concerning any problems you have had regarding INS enforcement practIces
1n your community and any suggestions you may have for modifications In the
INS Border Patrol policies. To do thla, please send your written comments to
Mr. Scott Field, Temecula's City Attorney, who 18 preparing our testimony.
The City of Temecula will then present your comments to the Subcommittee
at the time of the hearing via Mayor PatrIcia Birdsall. You may reach Scott
Field at:
Burka, Williams & Sorensen
3200 Bristol Street, Suite 640
Costa Mesa, California 92626
Phone: (714) 545-5559
FAX: 1714] 765-5648
Thank you' for your prompt response to this request.
David F. Dixon
City Manager,
DFD;ss
cc: Mayor Tim Nader
5b-'f
ITEM TITLE:
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
Claimant No.1:
Claimant No.2:
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item s;;.
Meeting Date 7/28/92
Claims Aqainst the City
Director ot personnel~~
ci ty Manaqer j6. '11 R\
(4/5ths Vote: Yes
No~)
Ms. Maria Burlaza
Ms. Edna Burlaza
c/o Milberq , DePhillips
Attorneys at Law
225 Broadway, suite 1313
San Dieqo, CA 92101
On June 30, 1992, claims were filed aqainst the city by Ms. Maria
Burlaza and her dauqhter, Ms. Edna Burlaza, for personal injuries they
alleqedly received on January 3, 1992, when a Chula vista Transit bus
swerved to avoid a collision. The claims seek damaqes within the jurisdic-
tion of the Municipal Court.
city bus service was provided contractually by American Transit Cor-
poration at the .time of this incident. The aqreement between American
Transit and the South Coast orqanization operatinq Transit (SCOOT) con-
tained a hold harmless clause and provided for indemnification. Because
the city has neither jurisdiction nor control over transit complaints, it
is the recommendation of the city's claims adjustors, Carl Warren' Com-
pany, and Risk Manaqement staff that these clai~be denied.
Claimant No.3:
Claimant No.4:
Ms. Maria Sosa
Ms. Roxana Sosa
c/o Milberq , DePhillips
Attorneys at Law
225 Broadway, suite 1313
San Dieqo, CA 92101
On July 13, 1992,
Sosa and her dauqhter,
received on January 13,
denly at a stop siqn.
the Municipal Court.
claims were tiled aqainst the city by Ms. Maria
Ms. Roxana Sosa, for injuries they alleqedly
1992, when a Chula vista Transit bus stopped sud-
The claims seek damaqes within the jurisdiction of
city bus
poration at the
Transit and the
Form A-1l3 (Rev. 11/79)
service was provided contractually by American Transit Cor-
time of this incident. The aqreement between American
South Coast Orqanization Operatinq Transit (SCOOT) con-
Sc-/
uo pi3n~wqns
Pi343ellV :lN3Wn300 lVlN3WNOHIAN3
.li34l0
lS~l UO~le3~J~lON -----leLd -----i33UeU~p.lO -----uo~lnLOSi3H -----luawi3i3.l6V
S1I8IHX3
ITEM
MEETING DATE:
~
7/28/92
tained a hold harmless clause and provided for indemnification. Because
the city has neither jurisdiction nor control over transit complaints, it
is the recommendation of the city's claims adjustors, Carl Warren & Com-
pany, and Risk Management staff that these claims be denied.
RECOMMENDATION: Deny the above four claims.
j
~c-~
Rr::C~!\IC:D.
_ .i_, -., J
'92 J.l14 1'2:36
10
c
.-."i
CITY C: ':.<. ',r:;TA
CITY CL[;(:'.'S UFFICE
--~J
Ju I y 9, 1992
Hon. Tim Nader and Councilmembers:
It is with deep regret that I must offer my resignation
from the MNontgomery Planning Committee as of July 16. This
is not an impulsive decision, but rather an action that has
been carefully thought out. My resignation is not due to
anyone thing, but rather the culmination of events.
"The time has come. the Walrus said. to talk of many
things..." It would be very easy to resign without comment.
but I feel obligated to call the reasons for this step to
your attention. Hopefully, the future will be better for
those who will follow me on the MPC.
In order for a government to work. the people ~ be
allowed a meaningful voice in it. Unfortunately. today in
Chula Vista. it has been shown that this is not wanted.
Though the committees/commissions don't expect to always be
in complete agreement with the Council, it is not
unreasonable to expect that the time and effort the members
take in doing their job be met with respect. I feel that
the city is no longer responsive to the public as a whole,
but to certain interest groups. This road is not one that I
can follow! It is difficult to sit back and watch the City
ignore the MPC's recommendations time after time. It is
also painful to observe the behind-the-scenes maneuvering
that now seems to be the way of life in Chula Vista.
I will miss working to help make my city a better place
and wish the MPC and Chula Vista the best of luck.
;;~re0W~j
Lee Wheeland
Chair. MPC
_ WRITTEN COMMUNICATIO~.f~
aiJ1~0) ~ft~
0;. ~(/.Jl~---:; 5e/- /
S~CQ
ORDINANCE 2524 'lltD I?t..qDI/V,. ..
G.4
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING SECTIO'W .4l>Q
2.30.020 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO '1'1]01'{
MEMBERSHIP ON THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMISSION
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA does hereby ordain
as follows:
Section 1. That Section 2.30.020 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code is amended to read
as follows:
Section 2.30.020 Membership.
A. Number of Members.
The Commission shall consist of nine (9) Voting Members, a Staff Ex-
officio Member, and up to three (3) I*~tl General Ex-officio Members.
B. Designation of Members
1. Voting Members.
The Voting Members shall be appointed by the City Council from the
qualified electors of the City, two (2) of whom shall be appointed from a
classification consisting of nominees from the Board of Directors of the Chula
Vista Chamber of Commerce and who shall, at the time of their appointment and
throughout their term, have membership in the Chamber of Commerce; one (1) of
whom shall be a nominee from the Board of Directors of the South San Diego Bay
Cities Board of Realtors and who shall, at the time of their appointment and
throughout their term, have membership in the South San Diego Bay Cities Board
of Realtors; and six (6) of whom shall be residents of the City at large and who
shall, throughout their term, maintain their residency and elector status.
2. Staff Ex-officio Member.
The City Manager or his/her designate representative shall be an ex-officio
member of the commission, who shall not be required to be a qualified elector of
the City, but who shall have no vote ("Staff Ex-officio Member").
3. General Ex-officio Members.
The City Council, or its designee, may appoint not greater than five (5)
additional ex-officio members of the Commission, who shall not be required to be
qualified elector(s) of the City, but any such appointed ex-officio members shall
have no vote ("General Ex-officio Member").
C:,-I
Item ?
Meeting Date7/28/92
ITEM TITLE: RESOLUTION I~ 7.2~pprOving the Amendment to the
Agreement Between the city of Chula vista and ota Business
Park for the Sale of Property for a new City corpo ati ard and
authorizing the Mayor to execute same.
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
SUBMITTED BY: John M.
REVIEWED BY: Bruce M. Boogaard, City
BACKGROUND:
On June 30, 1992 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 16655
approv1ng an agreement to purchase land from Otay Rio Business Park
for a new City Corporate yard. The agreement contained specific
dates for the completion of conditions set forth in the agreement;
however, the execution of the agreement was delayed until July 15,
1992, which prevented the completion of the escrow and inspection
of the property by the City. Accordingly, the attached agreement
will extend the agreement to 10-15-92.
RECOMMENDATION: That the city Council adopt this Resolution.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATIONS: None
DISCUSSION:
On June 30, 1992 the City Council adopted Resolution No. 16655
approv1ng an agreement to purchase land from Otay Rio Business Park
for a new City Corporate yard. The agreement contained specific
dates for the completion of conditions set forth in the agreement;
however, the execution of the agreement was delayed until July 15,
1992, which prevented the completion of the escrow and inspection
of the property by the city.
Specifically, the effective date stated in the initial paragraph of
the agreement is June 3, 1992; however, the agreement was not
executed until July 15, 1992. The June 3, 1992 date would deprive
the City of the necessary time to inspect the property. The
proposed resolution adopts the amendment to the agreement which
changes the effective date to July 15, 1992.
In addition, the close of escrow, defined in Section 2.1.1 of the
agreement, requires the escrow to close no later than July 31,
1992. Since the contract was not executed until July 15, 1992,
this date could not be met. Accordingly, the proposed resolution
requires the escrow to close no later than October 15, 1992.
7- / /'7-1-
RESOLUTION NO. /~ 7:i /P
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE AMENDMENT TO THE
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND
OTAY RIO BUSINESS PARK FOR THE SALE OF
PROPERTY FOR A NEW CITY CORPORATION YARD AND
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAME.
WHEREAS, on June 30, 1992 the City Council approved Resolution
16655 approving an "Agreement for the Purchase and Sale of Real
Property" ("Agreement") with Otay Rio Business Park for a new
corporation yard; and,
WHEREAS, the Agreement is dated as of June 3, 1992 and was not
executed by the City until July 15, 1992; and,
WHEREAS, the dates in the Agreement defining the effective
date and the close of escrow are no longer applicable because of
the date of execution; and,
WHEREAS, the Agreement will automatically terminate before its.
terms can be complied with unless the Agreement is amended to
extend these dates.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Chula vista does hereby approve the Amendment to the
Agreement between the City of Chula vista and Otay Rio Business
Park for the Sale of Property, known as document number ,
a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of Chula
vista is hereby authorized and direct:;d to execute said Amendment
for and on behalf of the Cit~Of Chula ista.
( /
Submitted and approved by: 4<<,,-A
ruce M. Boogaa
City Attorney
I
7-3 /7-'1
<<
FIRST AMENDMENT TO
THE AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND
OTAY RIO BUSINESS PARK FOR
THE SALE OF PROPERTY
This FIRST Amendment to the Agreement for the Purchase and
Sale of Real Property ("Amendment") between the City of Chula
Vista, a chartered municipal corporation ("City") and Otay Rio
Business Park, a California joint venture ("Otay Rio") consisting
of Amalgamated citrus Growers, Inc. and the Chillinqworth
corporation, is made with reference to the following facts:
Whereas, city and Otay Rio executed an "Agreement for the
Purchase and Sale of Real Property" ("Agreement") dated as of June
3, 1992, but not executed until July 15, 1992 and is incorporated
as Exhibit "A" hereto; and,
Whereas, it is the intent of the Parties to amend the
Agreement in accordance with section 10.4 of the Agreement to
modify the Effective Date and the Close of Escrow Date to reflect
the current intent of the Parties;
Now, therefore, the Parties hereto, in consideration of the
mutual promises, conditions, and covenants herein contained, do
hereby agree, in exercise of City's powers of eminent domain, as
follows:
1. Effective Date. The Effective Date identified in the
initial paragraph of the Agreement is hereby changed from "June 3,
1992" to "July 15, 1992."
2 . Close of Escrow. Paragraph 2. 1. 1 of the Agreement which
contains the definition of "Close of Escrow," is hereby amended so
as to read in its entirety as follows:
"Close of Escrow" means the date the Grant Deed is recorded
after compliance with all the conditions of this Agreement and
the conditions of escrow, which date shall be no later than
October 15, 1992. If the Close of Escrow has not occurred by
October 15, 1992, then this Agreement shall automatically
terminate (except with respect to City's obligations under
section 5 hereof) and neither party shall have any further
obligation to the other.
3. Authoritv. city and Otay Rio represent that the
individuals signing this Amendment on behalf of City and Otay Rio,
respectively, have full right and authority to bind their
respective Parties to this Amendment.
4. CaDtions And Headinas. The captions and headings in this
Amendment are solely for purposes of convenience, are not part of
this Amendment, and may not be used to interpret this Amendment.
7-5'
5. CounterDarts. The Parties may execute this Amendment in two
or more counterparts, which shall, in the aggregate, be signed by
all Parties. Each counterpart shall be deemed an original
instrument as against any Party who has signed it.
6. Defined Terms. Unless otherwise defined herein, all words
with their initial letter capitalized shall have the same meaning
as set forth in the Agreement.
7. No Other Chanaes. Except as expressly modified herein, the
Agreement shall remain unmodified and in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have duly executed this
instrument on the date below.
Dated:
July _, 1992
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
Bruce M. Boogaa
City Attorney
Attest:
By:
Its:
OTAY RIO BUSINESS PARK
By: Amalgamated citrus
Growers, Inc.
By:
Its:
Beverly Authelet
City Clerk
Agreement Between the City of Chula Vista and otay
Rio Business Park for Sale of Property, executed on
July 15, 1992.
Exhibit A:
?-~
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item: '6
Meeting date: 7-28-92
ITEM TITLE: RESOLUTION \ Ie> "'~I Aut hori zing the dest ruct i on of
Police Department Background Records.
SUBMITTED BY: Chief of POliC~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes___No_X_>
REVIEWED BY: City Manager J(,i ~~~
RECOMMENDATION: Council approve the attached Resolution to
destroy records
BOARDS/COMMISIONS RECOMMENDATION: None.
DISCUSSION:
desirable to
years of age
valid.
The files to be destroyed are 34 Peace Officer and Community
Officer confidential backgrounds. These are files of individuals
who were not hired.
The proposed destruction is in compliance with the Records
Retention Policy.
Each background file includes:
The destruction of the attached list of files is
conserve storage space. These records are past five
and the information contained within is no longer
1. Applicant Personal History Statement.
2. Miscellaneous Certificates.
3. Confidential Reference Letters.
4. Confidential DMV, Criminal History, Credit and Military
History.
5. Confidential results of Polygraph and Psychological exams.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
~ - \
Request for Consent of City Attorney
for the Destruction of Records
Pursuant to the provisions of section 34090 and 34090.5, the
undersigned, a department head of the City of Chula Vista, hereby
represents to the City Attorney as follows:
A. There presently exist records of the City as generally
identified in the attached Exhibit A ("Records"), a detailed
list of which has been separately provided to the City
Attorney.
B. Said records and in that regard, has determined that
such records do not include the following:
(1) Records affecting the title to real property or
liens thereon;
(2) Court records;
(3) Records required to be kept by statute;
(4) Records less than two years old;
(5) The minutes, ordinances, or resolutions of the
legislative body or of a ity board or commission.
~J~
Date: 01~4q).-
Consent of the city Attorney
ruce M. Boogaard
city Attorney
Pursuant to the provisions of
ment Code, the city Attorney her y
of said records.
Date:
~-2-
RESOLUTION NO.
M~7
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF
POLICE DEPARTMENT BACKGROUND RECORDS
The City Council of the city of Chula vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the Chief of Police has submitted a list of
files which are desirable to be destroyed in order to conserve
storage space; and
WHEREAS, these records are past five years of age and the
information contained within is no longer valid; and
WHEREAS, the files to be destroyed are 34 Peace Officer
and Community Officer confidential backgrounds of individuals who
were not hired; and
WHEREAS, each background file includes:
1. Applicant Personal History Statement;
2. Miscellaneous Certificates;
3. Confidential Reference Letters;
4. Confidential DMV, criminal History, Credit and
Military History;
5. Confidential results of Polygraph and Psychological
exams;
WHEREAS, the proposed destruction is in compliance with
the Records Retention Policy.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the city of Chula vista does hereby authorize the destruction of
Police Department background records.
-t
Presented by
Richard Emerson, Chief of
Police
(Res\Destruct)
~-3
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item -2-
SUBMITTED BY
. Meeting Date 7/12,/1)2
Resolution It 7 ~ ~UthOriZing the Mayor to execute a
Hold Harmless Indemnification Agreement with Rohr Inc relative
to the National Night Out event scheduled for August 4, 1992.
Chief of police~ (!
City Manager .J{,. ~@
(4/5ths Vote: Yes_No.x.)
ITEM TITLE
REVIEWED BY
RECOMMENDATION:
Approve the Agreement
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not Applicable
DISCUSSION:
On July 21st, Council approved an item endorsing the ninth annual National Night Out event.
Many of the persons who will be attending the event will be using the Rohr parking lot while
attending the event. Therefore, Rohr has requested that it be named as an additional insured
under the City's existing liability policy and that a Hold Harmless Indemnification Agreement
be executed. The Risk Manager has reviewed Rohr's request and stated that the City can
comply therewith at no additional cost.
Rohr's request was made too late to be inc1udedjn the previous Council action on the National
Night Out event.
FISCAL IMPACT: None
9-1/9-1-
RESOLUTION NO. J 6 7.2. t'
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE
A HOLD HARMLESS INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT WITH
ROHR, INC. FOR "NATIONAL NIGHT OUT" FUN RUN EVENT
The City Council of the city of Chula vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, August 4, 1992 will represent the ninth annual
"National Night Out" which is a nationwide effort to heighten crime
prevention awareness, strengthen neighborhood spirit and pOlice-
community relations and generate support and participation for
local crime prevention programs; and
WHEREAS, on July 21, 1992, the city Council approved an
item endorsing the ninth annual "National Night Out" event; and
WHEREAS, since many of the persons who will be in
attendance at the event will be using the Rohr parking lot while
attending the event, Rohr, Inc. has asked that the City submit a
certificate of insurance naming Rohr, Inc. as additional insured;
and
WHEREAS, in addition, Rohr, Inc. has also requested that
the City sign a Hold Harmless Indemnification Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Mayor of the city
of Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Hold
Harmless Indemnification Agreement with Rohr, Inc., a copy of which
is on file in the office of the City Clerk, in connection with a
"National Night Out" event to be held at Bayside Park on
August 4, 1992.
Richard Emerson, Chief of
Police
by
Presented by
Bruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
(Res\Rohr.Agt)
9-3 /OJ~i
.
.
.
HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND ROHR. INC. FOR
NATIONAL NIGHT OUT EVENT TUESDAY. AUGUST 4. 1992
This Agreement is entered into this day of July, 1992
between the City of Chula vista (CITY) and Rohr, Ino. (Rohr)
1. city shall oomply with all applioable laws, rules and
regulations of Rohr and other governmental entities.
2. City shall keep the property and all equipment used in
oonneotion with this permit in a olean, safe and sanitary
manner and in good repair at all times. Allor any
portion of the seourity deposit shall be available
unoonditionally to Rohr for the purpose of oleaning or
repairing damages to the property upon termination of
this agreement.
City shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless Rohr, its
offioers and employees against all oauses of aotion, for
judioial relief of any kind, for damage to property of
any kind whatsoever, and to whomever belonging, inoluding
City, or injury to or death of any person or persons,
inoluding employees of city, resulting direotly or
indireotly or arising from the use of the Rohr property
as a publio parking lot for the National Night Out Event.
4. City shall maintain oomprehensive publio liability
(oovering operations, produots and oompleted operations)
and blanket oontraotual ooverage insuranoe throughout the
term of this agreement. The polioies shall, as a
minimum, provide:
3.
Combined Single Limit $1,000,000.00
Certifioates of suoh insuranoe, in a form satisfaotory to
Rohr, shall be filed with Rohr's community Relations
Department. Insuranoe certifioates filed pursuant to
this agreement shall oontain a non-oanoellation-without-
notioe olause and shall provide that oopies of
oanoellation notioes shall be sent to Rohr.
5. The rights and privileges extended by this Agreement are
non-exolusive.
9-5
.
.
.
6.
City shall not enqaqe in any activity on property of Rohr
other than a SK Fun Run, 2 Mile Walk Event.
"71'
Bruce Booqaard
city Attorney
City of Chula vist
Tim Nader, Mayor
City of Chula vista
RohrAqree
ROHR, INC.
9~6
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item \ 0
Meeting Date 7/28/92
ITEM TITLE: a) Resolution 1(q"It- Ordering changes and modifications in
proceedi ngs and assessments in Assessment Di stri ct No. 90-1
(Salt Creek 1)
b)
Resolution I~'" II Authorizing certain assessment district
bonds to be sold at a public sale and directing a call for
sealed bids in Assessment ~~S)rict No. 90-1 (Salt Creek I)
Director of Public Works ~
Director of Finance~
City Manager .J~ to.~
(4/5ths Vote: Yes___No-x-)
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
On October 22, 1991, by Resolution 16382 Council established Assessment
District No. 90-1 (Salt Creek I) and levied assessments for the acquisition
and financing of certain infrastructure improvements serving the Salt Creek I
development pursuant to the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913. The
improvements have now been completed and it is necessary that the proceedings
be final ized and the 1915 Act bonds be sold to provide the funds for the
improvement acquisition.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the resolutions.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
At the time the assessment district was established, all of the improvements
were not completed, however, marketing of homes in a portion of the
deve 1 opment was about to begi n. As a result, the assessments were based on
estimated improvement costs. The improvements, which include major and
collector streets, util ity systems, storm drains, reclaimed water systems,
landscaping and irrigation systems, have now been completed and the final
costs have been determined.
As a result of reduct ions in both construction and i ncidenta 1 costs, the
overall amount to be assessed to the district is being reduced from the
$5,126,385 that was approved at the public hearing, to $4,747,262. The
reduction in construction costs is $518,431, and the reduction in incidental
costs is $56,014. Partially offsetting this savings in construction and
incidental costs, however, is a reduction of $445,872 in the amount of
developer contribution required to maintain the assessments below the 2% of
sales price in accordance with Council Policy.
10-1
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date 7/28/92
The foll owi ng tabl e shows the reduct ions in assessments, from confi rmed to
modified, resulting from the cost savings:
SFD
Conf. Mod.
TOWN HOME
Conf. Mod.
CONDO
Conf. Mod.
Construction
Incidentals
$ 9,905 $ 8,501
3.650 2.749
$13,555 $11,250
$7,303 $6,504
2.617 2.104
$9,920 $8,608
$7,303 $6,504
2.358 733
$9,661 $7,237
Total
Developer
Contribution
-505
o
-940
o
-2,424 -1,302
$7,237 $7,237
Amount Assessed
$13,050 $11,250
$8,980 $8,608
Due to the reduction in the amount assessed to the district, developer
contributions are no longer required for the single family detached and
townhome units. A contribution is still required for the condominium units.
The proposed assessments are within all criteria set forth by Council policy.
The City pol icy 1 imiting the 1 ien to value ratio and total debt service and
taxes to less than 2% have been met. Attachment "A" provides a breakdown of
these items.
There are two resolutions on today's agenda which, if adopted, accomplish the
following:
1. The RESOLUTION ORDERING CHANGES AND MODIFICATIONS IN THE PROCEEDINGS
provides for the changes to the Engineer,s Report necessary to include
updated construct ion and i nci denta 1 costs and to modify the assessments
to the land in the district.
2. The RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING CERTAIN ASSESSMENT BONDS TO BE SOLD AT PUBLIC
SALE authori zes the fi nanci a 1 consultant to advertise for compet it i ve
seal ed bids in the sale of the bonds to be issued as a part of these
proceedings.
FISCAL IMPACT: None to the City. The cost of modifying the proceedings and
the bond sale is being paid by the assessment district. The developer already
deposited the 1% origination charge. Upon the bond issuance, a total of
$47,472.62 will be transferred to the General Fund.
LdeT/AY-082
WPC 6046E
10- "2-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MFS
AMENDED FINAL
ENGINEER'S REPORT
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
JULY 1992
PREPARED BY
MUNI FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.
42217 Rio Nedo, Second Floor
Temecula, CA 92590
(714) 699-3990
FAX: (714) 699-3460
3727 Buchanan, Suite 202
San Francisco, CA 94123
(415) 441-3550
FAX: (415) 441-1401
/CJ '3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MFS
AMENDED FINAL
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PROJECT SUMMARY ........................................... 1
ENGINEER'S REPORT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 2
PART I - PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS ......................... 5
PART II - CONSTRUCTION COSTS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 6
PART III - ASSESSMENT ROLL. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 29
PART IV - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM ............................ 40
PART V - DESCRIPTION OF WORK ............................ 41
APPENDIX ................................................... 45
/IJ ",1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MFS
PROJECT SUMMARY
Date
Adopt Boundary Map
Resolution of Intention
Presentation of Confirmed
Engineer's Report
Public Hearing
Confirmation of Assessments
September 17, 1991
September 17, 1991
October 22, 1991
October 22, 1991
October 22, 1991
Ordering Changes/Modifications
Authorization for AD Bonds to be Sold
July 28, 1992
July 28, 1992
The Assessment District is for the purpose of acquiring certain public improvements
under the Municipal Improvement Act of 1913. The General administration of this District
will be undertaken by the City of Chula Vista and all official actions will be made by the
City Council.
The Baldwin Company has previously submitted a tentative subdivision map known
as Salt Creek I, Chula Vista Tract 89-09 for 130 acres located at the northeasterly and
southeasterly quadrants of East "H" Street and the proposed State Route 125.
Salt Creek I is included within the Development Impact Fee ("DIF"), Eastern Territory,
1991, which directs that specific infrastructure be provided to mitigate area deficiencies.
Those specific facilities built by Salt Creek I shall be noted within this report and identified
with Section "C" of the Cost Estimate Section. The DIF, as set by the DIF Report per
Residential Category, shall be incorporated and additive to the final assessment district
lien. For this district, the DIF Facilities to be incorporated are those directly related to the
grading, street improvement and landscaping of East "H" Street from East Lake Drive to
Mt. Miguel.
The cost of the acquisition of these improvements and incidentals and the DIF is
assigned to every parcel of land within the District that has received an improvement and
is benefitted by the improvement. The level of benefit varies according to land use and
utilization of the improvements funded.
Confirmed Amended Final
Acquisition Construction Cost $4,251,556.86 $3,733,126.48
Less Developer Contribution (615,955.89) (170,083.82)
Incidental Expenses 670,562.38 614,547.56
Cost of Issuance 820,221.59 569,671.39
Balance to Assessment $5,126,384.94 $4,747,261.61
Additional information may be obtained by contacting the office of the Public Works
Director, John P. Lippitt.
1
It? -:5
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MFS
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ENGINEER'S REPORT
PURSUANT TO THE PROVISIONS
OF SECTION 10204 OF
THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE
Pursuant to the provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", being Division
12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and in accordance with
the Resolution of Intention No. 16343, adopted by the City Council of the
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
(hereinafter referred to as the "CITY"), in connection with the proceedings for
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
SALT CREEK I
(hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District"), I, John P. Lippitt submit herewith
the Report for the Assessment District, consisting of five (5) parts as follows:
PART I
Pians and specifications for the improvements to be acquired are filed herewith and
made a part hereof. Said plans and specifications are on file in the Offices of the City
Clerk and the Superintendent of Streets.
PART II
The actual cost of the improvements to be acquired, including incidental costs and
expenses in connection therewith, is set forth on the lists thereof, attached hereto, and
are on file in the office of the City Clerk.
2
/t:J--?
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MFS
PART III
A proposed assessment of the total amount of the costs and expenses of the
improvements upon the several subdivisions of land within the assessment district, in
proportion to the estimated benefits to be received by such subdivisions, from said
improvements, is presented upon the assessment roll filed as a part of this report.
PART IV
A Diagram showing the assessment district and the boundaries of the subdivision
of land within said assessment district, as the legal parcels existed at the time of the
passage of the Resolution of Intention, is filed herewith and made a part hereof.
PART V
Description of the work for the improvements are filed herewith and made a part
hereof. Description of all rights-of-way, easements and lands to be acquired, if necessary,
is set forth on the lists thereof and are on file in the Office of the City Clerk.
This Preliminary Report dated this /7 day of S~.
, 1991.
I~h~.t~
Superintendent of Streets
City of Chula Vista
This Final Report dated this J. 1- day of (JJ" ,1991.
~ / -;:.,~;,.,-
John P. Up pitt
Superintendent of Streets
City of Chula Vista
3
)tJ- ?
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MFS
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
This Amended Final Report dated this
,1992.
day of
John P. Lippitt
Superintendent of Streets
City of Chula Vista
4
)j)~~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MFS
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
PART I - PlANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
Plans and Specifications for the improvements to be acquired are filed herewith and
made a part hereof. Said plans and specifications are on file in the Offices of the City
Clerk and the Superintendent of Streets.
5
/tf~1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MFS
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
PART II - CONSTRUCTION COSTS
SECTION A.
PROJECT NO.1:
PROJECT NO.2:
PROJECT NO.3:
PROJECT NO.4:
PROJECT NO.5:
PROJECT NO.6:
PROJECT NO.7:
PROJECT NO.8:
SECTION B.
SECTION C.
AMENDED FINAL CONSTRUCTION COSTS
PROJECT GRADING
EAST"H" STREET
STATE ROUTE 125 (SR 125)
WATER SYSTEM
RECLAIMED WATER SYSTEM
SEWER SYSTEM
OFFSITE SEWER - PROCTOR VALLEY ROAD
STORM DRAIN SYSTEM
CALCULATION OF MAXIMUM DIF
INCIDENTAL EXPENSES
BOND COSTS
BALANCE TO ASSESSMENT
6
)c9--/0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MFS
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
PART II - COST ESTIMATES
PROJECT NO.1: GRADING
ITEM NO.
DESCRIPTION
PRELIMINARY
ASSESSMENT
CONFIRMED
ASSESSMENT
AMENDED
FI NAL'
DIF
1
2
3
EAST"H" STREET
PROCTOR VALLEY ROAD
MT. MIGUEL ROAD
273,628.00
254,230.00
164.616.00
273,628.00
254,230.00
164.616.00
119,532.00
111,058.00
71.911.20
PROJECT NO.1 TOTAL $
692,474.00
119,532.00
0.00
0.00
692,474.00
302,501.20
119,532.00
SUMMARY OF PROJECT NO.1 COSTS ALLOCATION TO DISTRICT
EAST "H" STREET
PROCTOR VALLEY ROAD
MT. MIGUEL RD
COST
119,532.00
111,058.00
71.911.20
302,501.20
. Final Cos1s Modified Assessment
alter Confirmation.
7
ALLOCATION
(DIF)
50.00%
100.00%
AD COST
(DIF)
55,529.00
71.911.20
127,440.20
/tfJ-//
I MFS ACQUISITION
I ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
I
I PART II - COST ESTIMATES
PROJECT NO.2: EAST "H" STREET
I PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED AMENDED
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT FINAL DIF
I AC PAVING
I MOBILlZATION/
DEMOLlZATION 23,000.00 23,000.00 23,000.00 23,000.00
2 STRIPING AND SIGNAGE 9,000.00 9,000.00 9,000.00 9,000,00
3 STREET SURVEY MONUMENTS 2,530.00 2,530,00 2,530.00 2,530.00
I 4 TRENCH SHORING 2.00 2.00 2.00 2.00
5 SUPPLY BONDS 22,000.00 22,000.00 22,000.00 22,000.00
6 ACP 5"/16" AB (E.L. TO 125) 169,884.00 149,227.65 149,227.65 149,227.65
I 7 ACP ADDITIONAL 1/2" 240.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
8 CAB ADDITIONAL 1 /2" 140.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
9 ACP - 5/6 (125 TO MT MIG) 224,523.00 220,673.70 220,673.70 220,673.70
10 BUILD CHOKERS 0.00 17,061,06 17,061.06 17,061.06
I 11 ADDITIONAL EXCAVATION 0.00 31,466.89 31,466.89 31,466.89
12 ADDITIONAL AB 0.00 363,360.99 363,360.99 363,360.99
13 GUARD RAILS 7,700.44 7,700.44 7,700.44 7,700.44
I 14 TRAFFIC SIGNS 2,858.30 2,858.30 2,858.30 2,858.30
451,319.00 415,319.00 848,881.03 848,881.03
I SIDEWALK/CURB & GUTTER
I 1 6" TYPE G CURB & GUTTER 49,072.50 49,072.50 47,351.25 47,351.25
2 6" TYPE B-1 CURB 38,115.00 38,115.00 36,823.50 36,823.50
3 6" TYPE A AC BERM 3,450.00 3,450.00 4,508.00 4,508.00
I 4 PEDESTRIAN RAMP 882.00 882.00 442.00 442.00
5 PCC SIDEWALK PAVING 60,217.50 57,605.75 57,605.75 57,605.75
6 PCC MEDIAN & MAINT APRON 68,378.30 60,141.21 60,141.20 60,141.20
7 1" DEEP CONCRETE MOW STRIP 2,798.60 2,393.90 2,393.90 2,393.90
I 8 DEEP EDGE OF MEDIAN PLANTER 5,016.00 3,162.00 3,162.00 3,162.00
9 PCC DRIVEWAY 8,432.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
10 6" DEEP PCC SIDEWALK 850.00 1,100.00 1,100.00 1,100.00
I 11 GRASSCRETE PAVING 15,491.00 14,896.00 14,896.00 14,896.00
228,423.60
252,702.90 228,423.60 228,423.60
I
I
I 8
/f)-1c2
I MFS ACQUISITION
I ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
I
I PROJECT NO.2: EAST "H" STREET - CONTD:
I PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED AMENDED
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT FINAL DIF
I JOINT TRENCH
1 ELEC /GAS /TELEPHONE/CABLE 95,000.00 95,000.00 87,829.00 0.00
I 2 ELEC /GAS /TELEPHONE/CABLE 60,000.00 60,000.00 78,401.00 0.00
3 ADDITIONAL IRRIGATIONjT.S.
& GAS WORK (C.O. #5) 0.00 0.00 9,732.00 0.00
I 4 69 Kl/A CROSSING 0.00 0.00 21,617.41 0.00
155,000.00
155,000.00 197,579.61 0.00
I WALLS/FENCING
1 4' HIGH SPLIT RAIL FENCE 7,320.00 7,320.00 7,320.00 7,320.00
I 2 4' HIGH SPLIT RAIL FENCE 7,440.00 7,440.00 7,440.00 7,440.00
3 WROUGHT IRON FENCING 6,228.00 6,228.00 6,228.00 0.00
4 SLUMP BLOCK WALL/DETAIL 1 19,000.00 19,000.00 19.000.00 0.00
I 5 SLUMP BLOCK WALL/DETAIL 2 27,590.00 27,590.00 27,590.00 0.00
6 SLUMP BLOCK WALL/DETAIL 2A 37,324.00 37,324.00 37,324.00 0.00
7 SLUMP BLOCK WALL/DETAIL 4 104,490.00 104,490.00 91,041.00 0.00
8 BLOCK COLUMN/ANTI-GRAFFITI 11,220.00 11,220.00 11,220.00 0.00
I 9 SOUND WALL CHANGES 0.00 1,800.00 0.00
220,612.00 220,612.00 211,963.00 14,760.00
I STREET LIGHTS
I 1 STREET LIGHT 34,200.00 34,200.00 34,200.00 34,200.00
2 3" SIGNAL COND W/PULL BOXES 6,100.00 6,100.00 6,100.00 6,100.00
3 STREET LIGHT 26,000.00 26,000.00 22,000.00 22,000.00
4 3" SIGNAL COND W/PULL BOXES 2,800.00 2,800.00 2,800.00 2,800.00
I 69,100.00 69,100.00 65,100.00 65,100.00
I RETAINING WALLS
30,000.00 6,483.75 6,483.75
WALL B 0.00
I 30,000.00 30,000.00 6,483.75 6,483.75
I
I 9 1&--/3
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MFS
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
PROJECT NO.2: EAST "H" STREET. CONT'D:
PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED AMENDED
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT FINAL DIF
LANDSCAPE BETWEEN EASTLAKE DRIVE & SR 125
1 SUPPLY BONDS 12.050.00 12,050.00 12.050.00 12.050.00
2 AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM 77,004.00 77,004.00 68,800.16 68,800.16
3 SOIL TESTS/SOIL PREP 5,589.00 5,589.00 5,589.00 5,589.00
4 1 GALLON SHRUB 6,220.00 6,220.00 5,720.00 5,720.00
5 5 GALLON SHRUB 11,388.00 11,388.00 10,332.00 10,332.00
6 GROUND COVER 7,864.00 7,864.00 7,864.00 7,864.00
7 2" LAYER BARK MULCH 3,007.00 3,007.00 2,436.60 2,436.60
8 TREE STAKING COMP 1,235.00 1,235.00 1,085.00 1,085.00
9 TREE DRAINAGE COMP 2,470.00 2,470.00 2,170.00 2,170.00
10 HYDROSEED 195.00 195.00 195.00 195.00
11 FLAT PLANTS COMP 146.25 146.25 146.25 146.25
12 36" INSIDE DIA. X 18" HT
PRECASE CONC TREEWELL 20,995.00 20,995.00 20,995.00 20,995.00
13 90 DAY MAINTENANCE 1,863.00 1,863.00 1,863.00 1,863.00
14 TRAFFIC CONTROL 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00
15 IRR CHANGES FOR OPEN SPACE
DIST APPROVED BOUNDARIES 0.00 0.00 19,952.50 0.00
16 IRR CONVERSION. SOUTH SIDE 0.00 0.00 12,820.00 0.00
17 IRR CONVERSION. NORTH SIDE 0.00 0.00 6,375.00 0.00
165,894.25 165,894.25 172,525.51 144,246.01
10
/~~/'I
I MFS
I ACQUISiTiON
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
I (SALT CREEK i)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
I
PROJECT NO.2: EAST "H" STREET - CONT'D:
I PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED AMENDED
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT FINAL DIF
I LANDSCAPE FROM SR 125 TO MT MIGUEL RD
I 1 SLUMP BLOCK SIGN WALL 3,150.00 3,150.00 0.00 0.00
2 4" SLUMP BLOCK PLASTER 1,600.00 1,600.00 0.00 0.00
3 SIGN PLANTER WALL 19,425.00 19,425.00 0.00 0.00
I 4 4" ASPHALT PAVING 11,250.00 11,250.00 11,250.00 0.00
5 AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM 43,365.90 43,365.90 43,365.90 43,365.90
6 SOIL TESTS/SOIL PREP 6,500.39 6,500.39 6,500.39 6,500.39
I 7 1 GALLON SHRUB 2,944.00 2,944.00 2,944.00 2,944.00
8 5 GALLON SHRUB 3,840.00 3,840.00 3,840.00 3,840.00
9 15 GALLON SHRUB 1,188.00 1,188.00 1,188.00 1,188.00
10 15 GALLON TREE 6,204.00 6,204.00 6,204.00 6,204.00
I 11 48" BOX TREE 11 ,700.00 11,700.00 11,700.00 0.00
12 6" POTTED PLANTS 2,350.00 2,350.00 2,350.00 2,350.00
13 FLAT PLANTS AT CRIB 300.00 300.00 300.00 300.00
I 14 HYDROSEED #4 3,064.46 3,064.46 3,064.46 3,065.00
15 FLAT PLANTS COMP 2,507.29 2,507.29 2,507.29 2,507.00
16 36" INSIDE DIA X 18" HT
I PRECASE CONC TREEWELL 10,540.00 10,540.00 10,540.00 2,998.71
17 TREE DRAINAGE SYSTEM 1,240.00 1,240.00 1,240.00 0.00
18 TREE STAKING COMP 705.00 705.00 705.00 0.00
19 SHREDDED BARK MULCH 2,852.31 2,852.31 2,852.31 0.00
I 20 90 DAY MAINTENANCE 2,166.80 2,166.80 2,166.80 0.00
21 380' OF 2 1/2" MAINLINE
CHANGED TO 3" 0.00 0.00 380.00 380.00
I 136,893.15 136,893.15 113,098.15 75,643.00
I
I
I
I 11
I //Jr;>
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MFS
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
PROJECT NO.2: EAST "H" STREET - CONTD:
PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED AMENDED
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT FINAL DIF
EROSION CONTROL FROM SR 125 TO MT MIGUEL RD
1 AUTOMATIC IRRIGATION SYSTEM 122,614.22 122,614.22 122,614.22 0.00
2 SOIL TESTS/SOIL PREP 16,395.40 16,395.40 16,395.40 0.00
3 1 GALLON SHRUB 7,440.00 7,440.00 7,440.00 0.00
4 1 GALLON TREE 1,732.00 1,732.00 1,732.00 0.00
5 15 GALLON TREE 1,408.00 1,408.00 1,408.00 0.00
6 HYDROSEED MIX #1 3,295.50 3,295.50 3,295.50 0.00
7 HYDROSEED MIX #2 11 ,292.55 11,292.55 11,292.55 0.00
8 HYDROSEED MIX #3 2,293.61 2,293.61 2,293.61 0.00
9 HYDROSEED MIX #4 2,255.00 2,255.00 2,255.00 0.00
10 HYDROSEED MIX #5 202.38 202.38 202.38 0.00
11 TREE STAKING 2,305.00 2.305.00 2,305.00 0.00
12 #2 FLAT PLANTS 1,845.00 1,845.00 1,845.00 0.00
13 90 DAY MAINTENANCE 7,869.79 7,869.79 7,869.79 0.00
180,948.45 180,948.45 180,948.45 0.00
PROJECT NO.2 TOTAL 1,662,469.75 1,662,469.75 2,025,003.10 1,383,537.39
SUMMARY OF PROJECT NO.2 COSTS ALLOCATION TO DISTRICT
FINAL
COST ALLOCATION AD COST
AC PAVING 848,881.03 (DIF) (DIF)
SIDEWALK/CURB & GUTTER 228,423.60 (DIF) (DIF)
JOINT TRENCH 197,579.61 100% 197,579.61
WALLS & FENCING 211,963.00 93.04% 197,203.00
STREET LIGHTS 65,100.00 (DIF) (DIF)
RETAINING WALLS 6,483.75 (DIF) (DIF)
LANDSCAPE/EROSION CONTROL 466.572.11 52.87% 246.683.10
2,025,003.10 641,465.71
12
)tJ//~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MFS
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
PART II - COST ESTIMATES
PROJECT NO.3: STATE ROUTE 125
PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED AMENDED
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT FINAL DIF
ROUGH GRADING
EROSION CONTROL
EROSION CONTROL 5,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 0.00
5,000.00 5,000.00 0.00 0.00
FENCINGjWALLS
1 2' BLOCK 3' W.I 67,500.00 67,500.00 0.00 0.00
2 3' BLOCK 3 GLASS 49,500.00 49,500.00 0.00 0.00
3 6' - 9' BLOCK 150,000.00 150,000.00 0.00 0.00
4 SUPPLY BONDS 0.00 0.00 3,950.00 0.00
5 SLUMP BLOCK WALL PER DETAIL
2AjW-4 9' 6" HT 0.00 0.00 15,002.76 0.00
6 SLUMP BLOCK WALL PER DETAIL
2jW-4 9' 0" HT 0.00 0.00 13,724.04 0.00
7 SLUMP BLOCK WALL PER DETAIL
3jW-4 7' 0" HT 0.00 0.00 15,723.48 0.00
8 SLUMP BLOCK WALL PER DETAIL
2AjW.4 10' 6" HT 0.00 0.00 26.687.28 0.00
9 SLUMP BLOCK COLUMNS PER
DETAIL FjW.3 0.00 0.00 5,175.00 0.00
267,000.00 267,000.00 80,262.56 0.00
13
/tfJ- /7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MFS
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
PROJECT NO.3: STATE ROUTE 125 - CONT'D:
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION
PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED
ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT
AMENDED
FINAL
DIF
LANDSCAPE
1 IRRIGATION
2 LANDSCAPE
3 HYDROSEED
4 90 DAY MAINTENANCE
44,190.00 44,190.00 40,574.00 0.00
24,356.00 24,356.00 40,925.00 0.00
22,541.00 22,541.00 22,541.00 0.00
5,914.00 5,914.00 5,914.00 0.00
97,001.00 97,001.00 109,954.00 0.00
364,001.00 364,001.00 190,216.56 0.00
PROJECT NO.3 TOTAL:
SUMMARY OF PROJECT NO.3 COSTS ALLOCATION TO DISTRICT
FINAL
COST ALLOCATION AD COST
ROUGH GRADING 0.00 0.00% 0.00
FENCING/WALLS 80,262.56 100% 80,262.56
LANDSCAPE 109.954.00 0.00% 0.00
190,216.56 80,262.56
14
JIJ-/~
I MFS
ACQUISITION
I ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
I
I PART II - COST ESTIMATES
PROJECT NO.4: WATER SYSTEM
I PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED AMENDED
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT FINAL DIF
I H STREET
I 1 12" ACP 60,000.00 60,000.00 53.768.00
2 16" ACP 85,510.00 85,510.00 91,390.00
3 12" GATE VALVE 7,200.00 7,200.00 6,000.00
4 16" GATE VALVE 2,500.00 2,500.00 19,250.00
I 5 CONNECT #1 TO EXIST. 12" 2,400.00 2,400.00 2,400.00
6 CONNECT #2 TO EXIST. 16" 3,200.00 3,200.00 3,200.00
7 1" AIR-VAC ASSEMBLY 4,500.00 4,500.00 6,000.00
I 8 2" AUR-VAC ASSEMBLY 8,500.00 8,500.00 20,400.00
9 FIRE HYDRANT ASSEMBLY 13,200.00 13,200.00 13,200.00
10 12" ACP WATER MAIN 10,695.00 10,695.00 11 ,408.00
I 11 16" ACP WATER MAIN 58,140.00 58,140.00 63,004.00
12 2" BLOW OFF ASSEMBLY 4,800.00 4,800.00 10,800.00
13 4" BLOW OFF ASSEMBLY 9,600.00 9,600.00 8,000.00
14 WATER CONNECT - H ST & MT MIG 0.00 0.00 3,675.33
I 15 WATER LOCATION COST 0.00 0.00 501.03
16 VALVE COVERS, CHANGE CO #10 0.00 0.00 1,074.29
I 270,245.00 270,245.00 314,070.65
PROCTOR VALLEY ROAD
I 1 12" ACP CL150 44,960.00 44,960.00 19,640.00
2 6" FIRE HYDRANT 6,300.00 6,300.00 6,300.00
3 12" BUTTERFLY VALVE 900.00 900.00 900.00
I 4 10" ACP CL150 0.00 0.00 1,376.00
5 12" ACP CL200 0.00 0.00 27,140.00
6 ENCASEMENT 0.00 0.00 286.00
I 7 10" GATE VALVE 0.00 0.00 750.00
8 12" GATE VALVE 0.00 0.00 4,500.00
9 2" BLOW OFF 0.00 0.00 2,550.00
10 2" AIR RELEASE 0.00 0.00 1,800.00
I 11 1" AIR RELEASE 0.00 0.00 4,800.00
52,160.00 52,160.00 70,042.00
I
I
I 15 /tP~)1
I MFS
ACQUISITION
I ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
I
I PROJECT NO.4: WATER SYSTEM - CONT'D:
PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED AMENDED
I ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT FINAL DIF
I MT MIGUEL RD
16" ACP CL150 47,544.00 47,544.00 0.00
1
I 2 2" BLOW OFF 850.00 850.00 0.00
3 4" BLOW OFF 1,400.00 1,400.00 5,000.00
4 6" PRESSURE REDUCING
STATION (INCL ELEC) 34,500.00 34,500.00 34,500.00
I 5 16" BUTTERFLY VALVE 0.00 0.00 31,000.00
6 16" ACP CL200 0.00 0.00 64,645.00
7 2" AIR RELEASE 0.00 0.00 3,600.00
I 8 1" AIR RELEASE 0.00 0.00 3,200.00
9 CONNECT TO EXIST WATER 0.00 0.00 2,000.00
10 16" CL250 FLANGED VALVES 0.00 0.00 9,400.00
I 84,294.00 84,294.00 153,345.00
UNIT 1
I 1 10" ACP CL150 24,192.00 24,192.00 30,432.00
2 12" ACP CL150 3,920.00 3,920.00 3,920.00
I 3 6" FIRE HYDRANT 8,400.00 8,400.00 12,600.00
4 10" gate valve 2,250.00 2,250.00 5,250.00
5 1" air release 1 ,200.00 1 ,200.00 7,200.00
6 12" gate valve 0.00 0.00 1 ,800.00
I 39,962.00 39,962.00 61,202.00
I UNIT 2
1 10" ACP CL150 9,584.00 9,584.00 12,176.00
2 8" GATE VALVE 600.00 600.00 1,800.00
I 3 10" GATE VALVE 3,750.00 3,750.00 4,500.00
4 CONNECT TO EXISTING 1,000.00 1,000.00 . 0.00
5 1" AIR RELEASE 0.00 0.00 8,400.00
I 6 MOBILIZATION 0.00 0.00 4,180.00
7 SUPPLY BONDS 0.00 0.00 500.00
I 14,934.00 14,934.00 31,556.00
I
I 16 j()rd-O
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MFS
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
PROJECT NO.4: WATER SYSTEM - CONT'D:
PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED AMENDED
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT FINAL DIF
UNIT 3
1 10" ACP CL150 11,120.00 11,120.00 11.120.00
2 12" ACP CL150 9,560.00 9,560.00 9,560.00
3 6" FIRE HYDRANT 4,200.00 4,200.00 4,200.00
4 8" GATE VALVE 600.00 600.00 600.00
5 10" GATE VALVE 5,250.00 5,250.00 5,250.00
6 12" BUTTERFLY VALVE 900.00 900.00 900.00
7 1" AIR RELEASE 1 ,200.00 1 ,200.00 1 ,200.00
8 CONNECT TO EXIST WATER 2,000.00 2,000.00 2,000.00
34,830.00 34,830.00 34,830.00
PROJECT NO.4 TOTAL: 496,425.00 679,387.74 665,045.65
SUMMARY OF PROJECT NO.4 COSTS ALLOCATION TO DISTRICT
FINAL
COST ALLOCATION AD COST
EAST H STREET 314,070.65 37% 116,206.14
PROCTOR VALLEY ROAD 70,042.00 36% 25,215.12
MT MIGUEL ROAD 153,345.00 33% 50,603.85
UNIT 1 61,202.00 70% 42,841.40
UNIT 2 31,556.00 70% 22,089.20
UNIT 3 34.830.00 70% 24.381.00
665,045.65 281,336.71
17
/&-.2/
I MFS
I ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
I (SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
I
PART II - COST ESTIMATES
I PROJECT NO.5: RECLAIMED WATER SYSTEM
I PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED AMENDED
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT FINAL DIF
I H STREET
1 16" ACP 86,040.00 86,040.00 86,040.00
I 2 16" GATE VALVE 7,500.00 7,500.00 11,550.00
3 6" RP BACKFLOW 6,400.00 6,400.00 6,400.00
4 2" AIR-VAC ASSEMBLY 3,400.00 3,400.00 3,400.00
I 5 4" BLOW OFF ASSEMBLY 3,200.00 3,200.00 3,200.00
6 2" WATER SERVICE 9,900.00 9,900.00 9,900.00
7 16" ACP RECL WATER LINE 57,905.00 57,905.00 59,200.00
8 16" GATE VALVE 5,200.00 5,200.00 7,700.00
I 9 6" RP BACKFLOW PREVENTOR 6,400.00 6,400.00 0.00
185,945.00 185,945.00 187,390.00
I PROCTOR VALLEY ROAD
1 16" ACP CL200 76,825.00 76,825.00 76,475.00
I 2 16" BUTTERFLY VALVE 1,200.00 1,200.00 14,000.00
3 2" AIR VAC ASSEMBLY 1,800.00 1,800.00 1,800.00
4 2" WATER SERVICE 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00
I 5 2" AIR RELEASE 0.00 0.00 3,600.00
6 4" BLOW OFF 0.00 0.00 9,300.00
I 80,825.00 80,825.00 106,175.00
I
I
I
I
I 18 /f)~c2 ;)..
I MFS ACQUISITION
I ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
I
I PROJECT NO.5: RECLAIMED WATER SYSTEM - CONT'D:
I PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED AMENDED
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT FINAL DIF
I MT MIGUEL ROAD
1 16" ACP Cl200 26,215.00 26,215.00 36,750.00
I 2 8" ACP Cl200 19,908.00 19,908.00 12,896.00
3 4" BLOW OFF 3,100.00 3,100.00 3,100.00
4 1" AIR RELEASE 1 ,200.00 1 ,200.00 2,000.00
I 5 2" AIR VAC ASSEMBLY 3,600.00 3,600.00 0.00
6 2" WATER SERVICE 3,000.00 3,000.00 0.00
7 16" BUTTERFLY VALVE 0.00 0.00 7,000.00
I 8 CONNECT TO RECLAIMED 0.00 0.00 2,000.00
9 MOBILIZATION 0.00 0.00 5,000.00
10 SUPPLY BONDS 0.00 0.00 1,500.00
11 CONNECT TO EXIST RECL WATER
I (STA41 + 46.17) 0.00 0.00 1,000.00
57,023.00 57,023.00 71,246.00
I UNIT 1
1 8" ACP Cl2009 8,022.00 4,305.00 4,305.00
I 2 8" GATE VALVE 600.00 600.00 1,200.00
3 2" BLOW OFF 850.00 850.00 850.00
4 2" WATER SERVICE 2,000.00 2,000.00 4,000.00
I 5 1" AIR RELEASE 0.00 0.00 1,000.00
11,472.00 11,472.00 11,355.00
I PROJECT NO.5 TOTAL 335,165.00 335,165.00 376,166.00
I SUMMARY OF PROJECT NO.5 COSTS ALLOCATION TO DISTRICT
I FINAL
COST ALLOCATION AD COST
EAST H STREET 187,390.00 60% 112,434.00
I PROCTOR VALLEY ROAD 106,175.00 60% 63,705.00
MT MIGUEL ROAD 71,246.00 82% 58,421.72
UNIT 1 11.355.00 100% 11 355.00
I 376,166.00 245,915.72
I 19
/ tJ~ d}
I MFS
ACQUISITION
I ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
I
I PART II - COST ESTIMATES
PROJECT NO.6: SEWER SYSTEM
PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED AMENDED
I ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT FINAL DIF
I PROCTOR VALLEY RD
1 10" PVC SEWER 3,468.00 3,468.00 3,944.00
I 2 SEWER MANHOLE 3,000.00 3,000.00 1,500.00
6,468.00 6,468.00 5,444.00
MT MIGUEL ROAD
I 1 10" PVC SEWER 18,530.00 18,530.00 18,725.00
2 SEWER MANHOLE 10,500.00 10,500.00 12,000.00
I 3 SEWER CONNECTION 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00
4 CONNECT TO EXIST SEWER
(STA 39 + 80) 0.00 0.00 500.00
5 TRENCH SHORING 0.00 0.00 500.00
I 30,030.00 30,030.00 32,725.00
UNIT 1
I 1 10" PVC SEWER 34,714.00 34,714.00 37,536.00
2 SEWER MANHOLD 13,500.00 13,500.00 12,000.00
I 3 CUTOFF WALL 2,400.00 2,400.00 2,400.00
50,614.00 50,614.00 51,936.00
I PROJECT 6 TOTAL: 87,112.00 87,112.00 90,105.00
I SUMMARY OF PROJECT NO.6 COSTS ALLOCATION TO DISTRICT
FINAL
I COST ALLOCATION AD COST
PROCTOR VALLEY ROAD 5,444.00 47% 2,558.68
I MT MIGUEL ROAD 32,725.00 60% 19,635.00
UNIT 1 51,936.00 42% 21,813.12
I 90,105.00 44,006.80
I
I 20 /tJ~1
I MFS
ACQUISiTiON
I ASSESSMENT DISTRiCT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK i)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
I
I PART II - COST ESTIMATES
PROJECT NO.7: PROCTOR VALLEY OFFSITE SEWER
I PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED AMENDED
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT FINAL DIF
I MOBILIZATION 40,000.00 40.000.00 40,000.00
1
I 2 SUPPLY BONDS 6,500.00 6,500.00 6,500.00
3 15" PVC SEWER 110,600.00 110,600.00 88,200.00
4 12" PVC SEWER 33,980.00 33,980.00 33,880.00
5 10" PVC SEWER 82,460.00 82,460.00 82,460.00
I 6 SEWER MAN HOLD 46,400.00 46,400.00 48,000.00
7 CONNECT TO EXISTING 500.00 500.00 500.00
8 CONNECT TO EXISTING 500.00 500.00 500.00
I 9 CONCRETE CRADLE 7,500.00 7,500.00 3,900.00
10 CONCRETE ENCASEMENT 5,400.00 5,400.00 5,400.00
11 JACKED STEEL CASING 23,744.00 23,744.00 23,744.00
12 TRENCH SHORING 17,725.00 17,725.00 17,725.00
I 13 16" C-905 PVC SEWER PIPE 0.00 0.00 24,400.00
14 SEWER METERING 0.00 0.00 30,213.53
15 CORED RILL MANHOLE AND
I CONDUIT (AW) 0.00 0.00 460.00
PROJECT NO.7 TOTAL: 375,309.00 375,309.00 405,882.53
I
I SUMMARY OF PROJECT NO.7 COSTS ALLOCATION TO DISTRICT
FINAL
I COST ALLOCATION AD COST
OFFSITE SEWER 405,882.53 26% 105,529.46
I 405,882.53 105,529.46
I
I
I
I 21 ,/
I p~ .;2-~
I MFS ACQUISITiON
I ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK i)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
I
I PART II - COST ESTIMATES
PROJECT NO.8: STORM DRAIN SYSTEM
I PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED AMENDED
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT FINAL DIF
I EAST H STREET
1 18" RCP 12.900.00 12,900.00 13,410.00 0.00
I 2 24" RCP 10,575.00 10,575.00 10,575.00 0.00
3 36" RCP 4,500.00 4,500.00 4,320.00 4,320.00
4 42" RCP 31,590.00 31,590.00 31,590.00 31,590.00
I 5 48" RCP 48,760.00 48,760.00 48,336.00 48,336.00
6 CONC ENERGY DISSIPATOR 22,000.00 22,000.00 22,000.00 22,000.00
7 WING TYPE HEADWALL 4,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00
I 8 TYPE B-1 CURB INLET 23,800.00 23,800.00 23,800.00 23,800.00
9 TYPE B-1 CURB INLET W/LUG 7,200.00 7,200.00 7,200.00 7,200.00
10 TYPE A-4 CLEAN OUT 3,200.00 3,200.00 3,200.00 3,200.00
11 TYPE A-5 CLEANOUT 9,300.00 9,300.00 12,400.00
I 12 TYPE A-8 MOD CLEANOUT 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00 5,000.00
13 TYPE F CATCH BASIN 4,000.00 4,000.00 4,000.00
14 MOD TYPE F CATCH BASIN 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00 2,200.00
I 15 DRAINAGE BASIN 1,100.00 1,100.00 1,333.16
16 TYPE A-5 CLEANOUT TO GRADE 880.00 880.00 880.00
17 BROOKS 12" X 12" CATCH BASIN 10,920.00 10,920.00 7,350.00
I 18 6" PVC 10,010.00 1,010.00 0.00
19 CONNECT TO 48" RCP CLEANOUT 680.00 680.00 680.00
20 CONNECT TO EXIST 48" RCP 326.00 326.00 326.00
21 18" RCP 4,805.00 4,805.00 4,805.00
I 22 14" RCP 1,710.00 1,710.00 2,288.07
23 36" RCP 94,185.00 94,185.00 94,185.00
24 TYPE B-1 CURB INLET 10,800.00 10,800.00 10,800.00
I 25 TYPE A-4 CLEANOUT 11,600.00 11,600.00 11,600.00
26 CURB OUTLET TYPE D-25 4,000.00 4,000.00 0.00
27 BRICK & MORTAR PLUG 10.00 10.00 10.00
28 6" PVC 7,350.00 7,350.00 0.00
I 29 CONNECT 36" RCP TO CLEAN OUT 500.00 500.00 0.00
30 INSTALL MEDIAN DRAIN 0.00 0.00 64,099.49 64,099.49
31 INSTALL OF FRENCH DRAIN 0.00 0.00 36,385.83 36,385.83
I 32 RESTOCKING FEE 0.00 0.00 14,342.09 0.00
347,901.00 347,901.00 441,034.64 252,131.32
I
I
I 22 /tJ~c2?
I MFS ACQUISITION
I ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
I
I PROJECT NO.8: STORM DRAIN SYSTEM - CONT'D:
PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED AMENDED
I ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT FINAL DIF
I PROCTOR VALLEY ROAD
1 18" RCP 13500 5,504.00 5,504.00 5,504.00
2 36" RCP 13500 5,546.00 5,546.00 5,546.00
I 3 42" RCP 13500 4,380.00 4,380.00 4,380.00
4 60" RCP 13500 147,290.00 147,290.00 147,290.00
5 60" RCP 16500 41,658.00 41,658.00 41,658.00
I 6 66" RCP 116,358.00 116,358.00 116,358.00
7 CONCRETE LUG 1,116.00 1,116.00 1,116.00
8 A-6 CLEANOUT 2,900.00 2,900.00 2,900.00
I 9 A-7 CLEANOUT 9,120.00 9,120.00 9,120.00
10 SPECIAL CLEANOUT 7,300.00 7,300.00 10,200.00
11 11' B-1 INLET 4,150.00 4,150.00 4,150.00
12 13' B-1 INLET 3,450.00 3,450.00 3,450.00
I 13 15' B-1 INLET 3,660.00 3,660.00 3,660.00
14 17' B-1 INLET 4,810.00 4,810.00 4,810.00
15 TYPE F CATCH BASIN 2,350.00 2,350.00 2,350.00
I 16 WING HEADWALL 10,500.00 10,500.00 10,500.00
17 RIP RAP 5,900.00 5,900.00 5,900.00
18 A-6 CLEANOUT X=6 Y=7 8,900.00 8,900.00 8,900.00
19 a.7 CLEANOUT X=6 Y=7 4,500.00 4,500.00 4,500.00
I 20 SPECIAL SLURRY FOR DOUBLE
66" SO 5,880.00 5,880.00 5,880.00
21 BLASTING 60,000.00 60,000.00 0.00
I 455,272.00 455,272.00 398,172.00
I
I
I
I
I
I 23 /0-,), 7
I MFS
ACQUISITION
I ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
I
PROJECT NO.8: STORM DRAIN SYSTEM - CONT'D:
I PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED AMENDED
ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT FINAL DIF
I MT MIGUEL RD
I 1 18" RCP 1350D 5,280.00 5,280.00 5,280.00
2 21" RCP 1350D 2,808.00 2,808.00 2,808.00
3 24" RCP 1350D 5,775.00 5,775.00 25,704.00
I 4 30" RCP 1350D 3,975.00 3,975.00 3,975.00
5 36" RCP 1350D 56,935.00 56,935.00 56,935.00
6 42" RCP 1350D 56,648.00 56,648.00 56,648.00
7 A-4 CLEAN OUT 20,320.00 20,320.00 20,320.00
I 8 5' B-1 INLET 2,650.00 2,650.00 2,650.00
9 TYPE F CATCH BASIN 4,700.00 4,700.00 4,700.00
10 WING HEADWALL 3,500.00 3,500.00 3,500.00
I 11 RIP RAP 1,900.00 1,900.00 1,900.00
12 CUT OFF WALL 2,750.00 2,750.00 2,750.00
13 DESILTER 4,725.00 0.00 0.00
I 14 A-5 CLEANOUT 5,550.00 5,550.00 5,550.00
15 A-5 CLEANOUT X=5 Y=8 4,450.00 4,450.00 4,450.00
181,966.00 177,241.00 197,170.00
I UNIT 1
I 1 18" RCP 1350D 11,040.00 11,040.00 11,040.00
2 42" RCP 1350D 104,682.00 104,682.00 104,682.00
3 42" RCP 1500D 7,656.00 7,656.00 7,656.00
4 48" RCP 1350D 34,860.00 34,860.00 34,860.00
I 5 48" RCP 1400D 17,181.00 17,181.00 17,181.00
6 CONCRETE LUG 1,860.00 1,860.00 1,860.00
7 A-5 CLEAN OUT 24,975.00 24,975.00 24,975.00
I 8 27'B-1 INLET 4,850.00 4,850.00 4,850.00
9 26' B-1 INLET 4,600.00 4,600.00 4,600.00
10 19' B-1 INLET 4,100.00 4,100.00 4,100.00
I 11 21' B-1 INLET 4,310.00 4,310.00 4,310.00
12 23' B-1 INLET 4,350.00 4,350.00 4,350.00
13 TYPE F CATCH BASIN 7,050.00 7,050.00 7,050.00
14 CUTOFF WALL 5,500.00 5,500.00 5,500.00
I 15 9' B-2 INLET 3,100.00 3,100.00 3,100.00
16 BLASTING/ADD'L BACKFILL 29,000.00 29,000.00 0.00
I 269,114.00 269,114.00 240,114.00
PROJECT NO.8 TOTAL 1,254,253.00 1,254,253.00 1,262,148.55 252,131.32
I
I 24 JP- ;25f
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MFS
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
PROJECT NO.8: STORM DRAIN SYSTEM - CONT'D:
SUMMARY OF PROJECT NO.8 COSTS ALLOCATION TO DISTRICT
FINAL
COST ALLOCATION AD COST
EAST "H" STREET 441,034.64 42.83% 188,903.32
PROCTOR VALLEY ROAD 398,172.00 50% 199,086.00
MT MIGUEL ROAD 197,170.00 100% 197,170.00
UNIT 1 240.114.00 100% 240.114.00
1,262,148.55 825,273.32
25
/f)--d-1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MFS
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DiSTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK i)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
PART II - ESTIMATE OF CONSTRUCTION COSTS (CONTINUED)
A.D. 90-1 CONSTRUCTION ALLOCATION COST - SUMMARY
PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED AMENDED
ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT FINAL DIF
PROJECT NO.1: GRADING 291,731.00 291.731.00 127,440.20 119,532.00
PROJECT NO.2: EAST H STREET 608,042.08 608,042.08 641,465.71 1,383,537.39
PROJECT NO.3: SR 125 LANDSCAPING 267,000.00 267,000.00 80,262.56 0.00
PROJECT NO.4: WATER SYSTEM 209,393.47 209,393.47 281,336.71 0.00
PROJECT NO.5: RECLAIMED WATER 218,292.86 218,292.86 245,915.72 000
PROJECT NO.6: SEWER SYSTEM 42,315.84 42,315.84 44,006.80 0.00
PROJECT NO.7: OFFSITE SEWER SYSTEM 97,580.34 97,580.34 105,529.46 0.00
PROJECT NO.8: STORM DRAIN SYSTEM 874,427.01 874,427.01 825,273.32 252,131.32
PROJECT CONSTRUCTION COST: 2,608,782.60 2,608,782.60 2,351,230.48 1,755,200.71
CONTINGENCY (10%) 260,878.26 260,878.26 0.00
SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST: 2,869,660.86 2,869.660.86 2,351,230.48
'PLUS TOTAL DIF ALLOWED: 1,326,816.00 1,381,816.00 1,381,896.00
TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST $4,196,476.86 4,251,476.86 3,733,126.48
26
1f)~.J&
I MFS ACQUISITION
I ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
I ITEM NO. DESCRIPTION PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED AMENDED FINAL
I CONSTRUCTION COSTS: $4,196,476.86 $4,251,556.86 $3,733,126.28
I INCIDENTAL EXPENSES
1 PROJECT MANAGEMENT 16,000.00 16,000.00 16,000.00
I 2 ASSESSMENT ENGINEERING 56,650.00 56,650.00 56,650.00
3 DESIGN ENGINEERING 65,000.00 65,000.00 85,876.54
4 UTILITY CONSULTANT 11,335.00 11,335.00 12,631.00
5 BOND COUNSEL 35,390.42 35,126.38 34,747.26
I 6 FINANCIAL CONSULTANT 63,000.00 63,000.00 63,000.00
7 LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT 29,641.00 29,641.00 31,757.00
8 SOILS ENGINEERING 44,111.00 44,111.00 35,939.00
I 9 CONSTRUCTION SURVEY ISTAKE 63,886.00 63,886.00 77,868.41
10 PUBLIC AGENCY PROJECT MGMT 45,700.00 45,700.00 35,200.00
11 DEVELOPMENT BOND PREMIUM 653.00 653.00 650.00
I 12 PERMIT FEES
OTAY WATER 23,700.00 23,700.00 23,700.00
SDG&E 20,000.00 20,000.00 20,000.00
S D COUNTY 1,319.00 1,319.00 15,477.35
I CITY OF C V 135,000.00 135,000.00 45,310.00
13 PRINTING, ADVERTISING, POSTING 1,000.00 1,000.00 1,000.00
I 14 UTILITY FEE 144,790.00 144,790.00 145,090.00
LESS UTILITY REFUND (116,349.00) (116,349.00) (116,349.00)
15 PRINTING OF BID DOCUMENTS 14,618.00 20,000.00 20,000.00
16 BOND PRINTING, SERVICING &
I REGISTRATION 10,000.00 10,000.00 10,000.00
TOTAL INCIDENTAL COSTS $665,448.42 $670,562.38 $614,547.56
I DEVELOPER CONTRIBUTION (388,024.21) (615,955.89) (170,083.82)
I SUBTOTAL CONSTRUCTION
& EXPENSES $4,306.163.35 $4,217,978.82 $4,177,590.22
COSTS OF ISSUANCE
I CAPITALIZED INTEREST
(SIX MOS. @ 8%) 215,609.68 205,055.40 0.00
BOND DISCOUNT (3%) (2%) (2%) 161,707.26 102,527.70 94,945.23
I RESERVE FUNDS (10%) 539,024.21 512,638.49 474,726.16
SUBTOTAL COSTS OF ISSUANCE $916,341.15 $820,221.59 $569,671.39
I BALANCE TO ASSESSMENT $5,390,424.22 $5,126,384.94 $4,747,261.61
I
I 27 J t9~ J !
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MFS
ACQUISiTION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK i)
CiTY OF CHULA VISTA
SECTION "B"
MAXIMUM DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE
Pursuant to Ordinance No. 2431 (amending Ordinance No. 2251), the Development
Impact Fee (DIF) as it relates to the funding of transportation facilities in the City's eastern
territories has been given a value per development type. Financial and engineering
studies, and the City's General Plan show that the transportation network in the Salt
Creek I area will be adversely impacted by new development unless new transportation
facilities are added to accommodate an increased traffic generation.
Mitigating facilities, as defined within the Eastern Area Development Impact Fee for
Streets, Final 1990 Revision, are being constructed within the Salt Creek I project area.
Only those eligible DIF facilities within Assessment District No. 90-1 and their respective
costs shall be included within the assignment of the final spread to the parcels within the
boundary of the District, the remainder goes to DIF credit.
A.
CONSTRUCTION ESTIMATE
EAST "H" STREET:
Grading
Improvements
Storm Drain
Landscaping
$ 1 ,755,200.71
$ 119,532.00
$1,163,648.38
$ 252,131.32
$ 219.889.01
Subtotal
B. INCIDENTAL EXPENSES
DIF PROGRAM SUPPORT (2%)
$ 27.637.92
TOTAL
$1,782,838.63
C. DISTRICT DIF GENERATION
166 SFR @ $3,060
216 TWH @ $2,448
141 CDO @ $2,448
=
$ 507,960.00
$ 528,768.00
$ 345.168.00
=
=
MAXIMUM DIF
$ 1.381.896.00
BALANCE TO CREDIT
$ 400,942.63
28
/ tJ-;12
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MFS
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
MUNICIPAL IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1913,
DIVISION 12 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODES
OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
PART 11/ - ASSESSMENT ROLL
WHEREAS, on September 17, 1991, the City Council did, pursuant to the
provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the Streets
and Highways Code of the State of California, adopt Resolution of Intention No. 16343
for the acquisition of certain public improvements, together with appurtenances and
appurtenant work in connection therewith in a special assessment district known and
designated as
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(Hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District"); and,
WHEREAS, said Resolution of Intention, as required by law, did direct the
appointed Superintendent of Streets to make and file a report consisting of the following:
1) Plans and Specifications;
2) Cost of Improvements;
3) A proposed assessment of the costs and expenses of the works of
improvement ievied upon the parcels and lots of land within the boundaries
of the assessment district;
4) Assessment Diagram showing the assessment district and the subdivisions
of land contained herein;
5) A description of the public improvements to be acquired;
6) Assessment Engineer's Certificate verifying improvements.
For particulars, reference is made to the Resolution of Intention as adopted by the
City Council.
29
/Or.],}
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MFS
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
NOW THEREFORE, I, John P. Lippitt, as appointed Superintendent of Streets, and
pursuant to the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", do herein submit the following:
1) I, pursuant to the provisions of law and the Resolution of Intention, have
assessed the costs and expenses of the works of improvement to be
performed in the Assessment District upon the parcels of land in the
Assessment District benefitted thereby in direct proportion and relation to
the estimated benefits to be received by each of said parcels. For
particulars of the identification of said parcels, reference is made to the
Assessment Diagram.
2) As required by law, a Diagram is herein included, showing the Assessment
District boundary, as well as the boundaries of the benefitting parcels within
the district as the same existed at the time of the passage of said
Resolution of Intention, each of which subdivisions of land or parcels or lots
respectively have been given a separate number upon said Diagram and in
said Assessment Roll.
3) The subdivisions and parcels of land and the numbers therein as shown on
the respective Assessments Diagram as included herein correspond with
the numbers as appearing on the Assessment Roll as contained herein.
4) NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that bonds will be issued in accordance with
Division 10 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the
"Improvement Bond Act of 1915"), to represent all unpaid assessments and
the last installment of said bonds shall mature a maximum of TWENTY-FIVE
(25) YEARS from the _ day of next succeeding twelve
(12) months from their date. Said bonds shall bear interest at a rate not to
exceed the current legal maximum of 12% per annum.
5) By virtue of the authority contained in said "Municipal Improvement Act of
1913", and by further direction and order of the City Council, I hereby make
the following assessment to cover the costs and expenses of the works of
improvement for the Assessment District based on the costs and expenses
as set forth below:
Acquisition Construction Cost
Less Developer Contribution
Incidental Expenses
Costs of Issuance
Balance to Assessment
Confirmed
$ 4,251,556.86
< 615,955.89 >
670,562.38
820.221.59
$ 5,126,384.94
Amended Final
$ 3,733,126.48
< 170,083.82 >
614,547.56
569.671.39
$ 4,747,261.61
30
Jf)-3f
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MFS
6) In addition to or as a part of the assessment lien levied against each parcel
of land within the Assessment District, each parcel of land shall also be
subject to an annual assessment to pay costs incurred by the City and not
- otherwise reimbursed which result from the administration and collection of
assessments or from the administration or registration of any bonds and/or
reserve or other related funds. The maximum amount of such annual
assessment upon each parcel of land shall not exceed 5% of the amount of
the annual assessment installment.
7) All costs and expenses of the works of improvement have been assessed to
all parcels of land within the Assessment District in a manner which is more
clearly defined in the "Method and Formula of Assessment Spread", which is
a part of this Assessment Roll.
This preliminary report dated: S~. J)
, 1991
By:
U/~
IJOhn P: U~Pitt
Superintendent of Streets
City of Chura Vista
State of California
This final report dated: Oe:!- J.1- ,1991
By:
.. .~
John P. Uppitt
Superintendent of Streets
City of Chula Vista
State of California
31
/fl-3f'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MFS
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
This Amended Final Report dated:
, 1992
By:
John P. Lippitt
Superintendent of Streets
City of Chula Vista
State of California
32
/tJ/.J?
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MFS
I, Beverly A. Authelet, as City Clerk, do hereby certify that the foregoing
assessment, toget~t.:e diagram attached thereto, was filed in my office on
the \\ day of k , 1991.
\)~, ~~
City Clerk
City of Chula Vista
State of California
I, Beverly A. Authelet, as City Clerk, do hereby certify that the foregoing
assessment, together with the diagram attached thereto, was approved and
~~r.ed by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista on the .;lo').. day of
.... , 1991.
~l ~lL.~ ~
City Clerk 1 i~l.
City of Chula Vista
State of California
I, John P. Uppitt, as Superintendent of Streets of said City, do hereby certify that
the foregoing assessments, together with the diagram attached thereto, was
recorded in my office on the OJ.. '1- day of !!!5f ' 1991.
perintendent of Streets
City of Chula Vista
State of California
33
JIJ-J?
I M-~~
I
ACQU I 5 IT! ON
I ASSESSMENT OISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
I
ASMT LEGAL PRELIMINARY CONFIRMEO AMENOED FINAL
I NOS. APN OESCRIPTION ASMT. ASMT. ASMT.
===============================================================================================
1 159538001 1 LOT 1, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
I 2 159538002 ILOT 2, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
3 159538003 ILOT 3, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
4 159538004 ILOT 4, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
5 159538005 ILOT 5, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
I 6 159538006 ILOT 6, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
7 159538007 ILOT 7, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
8 159538008 ILOT 8, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
I 9 159538009 ILOT 9, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
10 159538010 ILOT 10, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
11 159538011 ILOT 11, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
I 12 159538012 ILOT 12, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
13 159538013 ILOT 13, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
14 159538014 ILOT 14, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049,61 11,250.46
15 159538015 ILOT 15, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
I 16 159538016 1 LOT 16, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11, 250.46
17 159538017 ILOT 17, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
18 159538018 1 LOT 18, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
I 19 159538019 ILOT 19, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
20 159538020 1 LOT 20, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11, 250.46
21 159538021 1 LOT 21, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
22 159538022 LOT 22, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
I 23 159538023 LOT 23, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
24 159538024 LOT 24, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11, 250.46
25 159538025 LOT 25, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
I 26 159538026 LOT 26, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
27 159538027 LOT 27, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11, 250.46
28 159538028 LOT 28, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
I 29 159538029 LOT 29, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
30 159538030 LOT 30, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
31 159538031 LOT 31, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11, 250.46
32 159538032 LOT 32, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
I 33 159538033 LOT 33, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
34 159538034 LOT 34, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11 ,250.46
35 159538035 LOT 35, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11, 250.46
I 36 159538036 LOT 36, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
37 159538037 LOT 37, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267,85 13,049,61 11,250.46
38 159538038 LOT 38, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11, 250.46
I 39 159538039 LOT 39, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
40 159538040 LOT 40, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
41 159538041 LOT 41, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11, 250.46
I
I J P-:J5
I MF~ 2
I
ACQU I S ITI ON
I ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK 1)
I
ASMT LEGAL PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED AMENDED FINAL
I NOS. APN DESCRIPTION ASMT. ASMT. ASMT.
==================================================================:-===========================
42 IS9s38042 1 LOT 42, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
I 43 159538043 ILOT 43, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
44 159538044 ILOT 44, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
45 159538045 1 LOT 45, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
46 159538046 ILOT 46, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
I 47 159538047 ILOT 47, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
48 159538048 ILOT 48, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
49 159538049 ILOT 49, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
I 50 159538050 ILOT 50, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
51 159538051 I LOT 51. MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
52 159538101 ILOT 52, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
I 53 159538102 ILOT 53, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
54 159538103 1 LOT 54, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
55 159538104 ILOT 55, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
56 159538105 ILOT 56, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
I 57 159538106 ILOT 57, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
58 159538107 ILOT 58, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 II. 250.46
59 159538108 ILOT 59, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
I 60 159538109 ILOT 60, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
61 159538110 1 LOT 61, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
62 159538111 ILOT 62, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
63 159538112 ILOT 63, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
I 64 159538113 ILOT 64, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 II. 250.46
65 159538114 ILOT 65, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
66 159538115 ILOT 66, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11.250.46
I 67 159538116 1 LOT 67, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
68 159538117 ILOT 68, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11.250.46
69 159538118 1 LOT 69, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11.250.46
I 70 159538119 ILOT 70, MAP 12827 91-292094 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
71 159539001 1 LOT I. MAP 12828 91-292095 14,267.85 13.049.61 11,250.46
72 159539002 ILOT 2, MAP 12828 91-292095 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
I 73 159539003 I LOT 3, MAP 12828 91-292095 14,267.85 13,049.61 11.250.46
74 159539004 1 LOT 4, MAP 12828 91-292095 14.267.85 13.049.61 11.250.46
75 159539005 ILOT 5, MAP 12828 91-292095 14.267.85 13,049.61 11.250.46
I 76 159539006 ILOT 6, MAP 12828 91-292095 14,267.85 13,049.61 11.250.46
77 159539007 ILOT 7, MAP 12828 91-292095 14.267.85 13,049.61 11.250.46
78 159539008 ILOT 8. MAP 12828 91-292095 14,267.85 13,049.61 11.250.46
I 79 159539009 ILOT 9: MAP 1282891-292095 14,267.85 13,049.61 11.250.46
80 159539010 ILOT 10, MAP 12828 91-292095 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
81 159539011 ILOT II, MAP 12828 91-292095 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
I
I /tJ~JI
mvc
3
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT NO.
90 -1
'
(SALT CREEK I)
ASMT
LEGAL
PRELIMINARY
CONFIRMED
AMENDED
FINAL
NOS.
APN
DESCRIPTION
ASMT.
ASMT.
ASMT.
82 159539012 ILOT 12,
MAP 12828 91- 292095 1 14,267.85 13,049.61
11,250.46
83
159539013
)LOT
13,
MAP
12828
91- 292095
14,267.85
13,049.61
11,250.46
'
84
159539014
ILOT
14,
MAP
12828
91- 292095
14,267.85
13,049.61
11,250.46
85
159539015
ILOT
15,
MAP
12828
91- 292095
14,267.85
13,049.61
11,250.46
86
159539016
ILOT
16,
MAP
12828
91- 292095
14,267.85
13,049.61
11,250.46
'
87
159539017
ILOT
17,
MAP
12828
91- 292095
14,267.85
13,049.61
11,250.46
88
159539018
ILOT
18,
MAP
12828
91- 292095
14,267.85
13,049.61
11,250.46
89
159539019
ILOT
19,
MAP
12828
91- 292095
14,267.85
13,049.61
11,250.46
90
159539020
ILOT
20,
MAP
12828
91- 292095
14,267.85
13,049.61
1
11,250.46
'
91
159539021
ILOT
21,
MAP
12828
91- 292095
( 14,267.85
13,049.61
1
11,250.46
92
159539022
ILOT
22,
MAP
12828
91-292095
14,267.85
13,049.61
11,250.46
'
93
94
159539023
159539024
ILOT
(LOT
23,
24,
MAP
MAP
12828
12828
91- 292095
91- 292095
14,267.85
14,267.85
13,049.61
13,049.61
11,250.46
11,250.46
95
159539025
ILOT
25,
MAP
12828
91- 292095
14,267.85
13,049.61
11,250.46
96
159539026
ILOT
26,
MAP
12828
91- 292095
14,267.85
13,049.61
11,250.46
97
159539027
ILOT
27,
MAP
12828
91- 292095
14,267.85
13,049.61
11,250.46
98
159539028
ILOT
28,
MAP
12828
91- 292095
14,267.85
13,049.61
11,250.46
99
159539029
ILOT
29,
MAP
12828
91- 292095
14,267.85
13,049.61
11,250.46
100
159539030
ILOT
30,
MAP
12828
91- 292095
14,267.85
13,049.61
11,250.46
101
159539031
ILOT
31,
MAP
12828
91- 292095
14,267.85
13,049.61
11,250.46
102
159539032
]LOT
32,
MAP
12828
91- 292095
14,267.85
13,049.61
11,250.46
103
159539033
ILOT
33,
MAP
12828
91- 292095
14,267.85
13,049.61
11,250.46
'
104
159539034
ILOT
34,
MAP
12828
91- 292095
14,267.85
13,049.61
11,250.46
105
159539035
ILOT
35,
MAP
12828
91- 292095
14,267.85
13,049.61
11,250.46
106
159539036
ILOT
36,
MAP
12828
91- 292095
14,267.85
13,049.61
11,250.46
107
159539037
ILOT
37,
MAP
12828
91- 292095
14,267.85
13,049.61
11,250.46
t
108
159539038
ILOT
38,
MAP
12828
91- 292095
14,267.85
13,049.61
11,250.46
109
159540001
ILOT
1,
MAP
12829 91- 292096
14,267.85
13,049.61
11,250.46
'
110
159540002
ILOT
2,
MAP
12829 91- 292096
14,267.85
13,049.61
11,250.46
111
159540003
ILOT
3,
MAP
12829 91- 292096
14,267.85
13,049.61
11,250.46
112
159540004
ILOT
4,
MAP
12829 91- 292096
14,267.85
13,049.61
11,250.46
'
113
159540005
ILOT
5,
MAP
12829 91- 292096
14,267.85
13,049.61
11,250.46
114
159540006
ILOT
6,
MAP
12829 91- 292096
14,267.85
13,049.61
11,250.46
115
159540007
ILOT
7,
MAP
12829 91- 292096
14,267.85
13,049.61
11,250.46
116
159540008
ILOT
8,
MAP
12829 91- 292096
14,267.85
13,049.61
11,250.46
'
117
159540009
ILOT
9,
MAP
12829 91- 292096
14,267.85
13,049.61
(
11,250.46
118
159540010
ILOT
10,
MAP
12829
91- 292096
14,267.85
13,049.61
11,250.46
119
159540011
ILOT
11,
MAP
12829
91- 292096
14,267.85
13,049.61
11,250.46
'
120
159540012
ILOT
12,
MAP
12829
91- 292096
14,267.85
13,049.61
11,250.46
1
121
159540013
SLOT
13,
MAP
12829
91- 292096
14,267.85
13,049.61
11,250.46
3
I M~~ 4
I
ACQUISITION
I ASSESSMENT OISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
I
ASMT LEGAL PRELIMINARY CONFIRMEO AMENOEO FINAL
I NOS. APN OESCRl PTlON ASMT. ASMT. ASMT.
===============================================================================================
122 159540014 ILOT 14. MAP 12829 91-292096 14.267.85 13.049.61 11. 250.46
I 123 159540015 ILOT 15. MAP 12829 91-292096 14.267.85 13.049.61 11.250.46
124 159540016 ILOT 16. MAP 12829 91-292096 14.267.85 13.049.61 11.250.46
125 159540017 ILOT 17. MAP 12829 91-292096 14.267.85 13.049.61 11. 250.46
126 159540018 ILOT 18. MAP 12829 91-292096 14.267.85 13.049.61 11.250.46
I 127 159540019 ILOT 19. MAP 12829 91-292096 14.267.85 13.049.61 11.250.46
128 159540020 ILOT 20. MAP 12829 91-292096 14.267.85 13.049.61 11.250.46
129 159540021 1 LOT 21. MAP 12829 91-292096 14.267.85 13.049.61 11.250.46
I 130 159540022 ILOT 22. MAP 12829 91-292096 14.267.85 13.049.61 11. 250.46
131 159540023 I LOT 23. MAP 12829 91-292096 14.267.85 13.049.61 11.250.46
132 159540024 ILOT 24. MAP 12829 91-292096 14.267.85 13.049.61 11.250.46
I 133 159540025 ILOT 25. MAP 12829 91-292096 14.267.85 13.049.61 11.250.46
134 159540026 ILOT 26. MAP 12829 91-292096 14.267.85 13.049.61 11.250.46
135 159540027 ILOT 27. MAP 12829 91-292096 14.267.85 13.049.61 11.250.46
136 159540028 ILOT 28. MAP 12829 91-292096 14.267.85 13.049.61 11. 250.46
I 137 159540029 ILOT 29. MAP 12829 91-292096 14.267.85 13.049.61 11.250.46
138 159540030 ILOT 30. MAP 12829 91-292096 14.267.85 13.049.61 11.250.46
139 159540031 1 LOT 31. MAP 12829 91-292096 14.267.85 13.049.61 11.250.46
I 140 159540032 ILOT 32. MAP 12829 91-292096 14.267.85 13.049.61 11.250.46
141 159540033 ILOT 33. MAP 12829 91-292096 14.267.85 13.049.61 11.250.46
142 159540034 ILOT 34. MAP 12829 91-292096 14.267.85 13.049.61 11.250.46
143 159540035 ILOT 35. MAP 12829 91-292096 14.267.85 13.049.61 11.250.46
I 144 159540036 1 LOT 36. MAP 12829 91-292096 14.267.85 13.049.61 11. 250.46
145 159540037 1 LOT 37. MAP 12829 91-292096 14.267.85 13.049.61 11. 250.46
146 159540038 ILOT 38. MAP 12829 91-292096 14.267.85 13.049.61 11.250.46
I 147 159540039 ILOT 39. MAP 12829 91-292096 14.267.85 13.049.61 11.250.46
148 159540040 ILOT 40. MAP 12829 91-292096 14.267.85 13.049.61 11.250.46
149 159540041 1 LOT 41. MAP 12829 91-292096 14.267.85 13.049.61 11. 250.46
I 150 159540042 ILOT 42. MAP 12829 91-292096 14.267.85 13.049.61 11.250.46
151 159540043 ILOT 43. MAP 12829 91-292096 14.267.85 13.049.61 11.250.46
152 159540044 ILOT 44. MAP 12829 91-292096 14.267.85 13.049.61 11.250.46
153 159540045 ILOT 45. MAP 12829 91-292096 14.267.85 13.049.61 11.250.46
I 154 159540046 1 LOT 46. MAP 12829 91-292096 14.267.85 13.049.61 11.250.46
155 159540047 ILOT 47. MAP 12829 91-292096 14.267.85 13.049.61 11.250.46
156 159540048 ILOT 48. MAP 12829 91-292096 14.267.85 13.049.61 11.250.46
I 157 159540049 ILOT 49. MAP 12829 91-292096 14.267.85 13.049.61 11. 250.46
158 159540050 ILOT 50. MAP 12829 91-292096 14.267.85 13.049.61 11.250.46
159 159540051 1 LOT 51. MAP 12829 91-292096 14.267.85 13.049.61 11.250.46
I 160 159540052 ILOT 52. MAP 12829 91-292096 14.267.85 13.049.61 11.250.46
161 159540053 ILOT 53. MAP 12829 91-292096 14.267.85 13.049.61 11.250.46
162 159540054 ILOT 54. MAP 12829 91-292096 14.267.85 13.049.61 11.250.46
I
I /P~1/
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
M~~
5
ACQU I S ITI ON
ASSESSMENT OISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
ASMT LEGAL PRELIMINARY CONFIRMED AMENOEO FINAL
NOS. APN DESCRIPTION ASMT. ASMT. ASMT.
=====================================================================~=========================
163 159540055 ILOT 55, MAP 12829 91-292096 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
164 159540056 ILOT 56, MAP 12829 91-292096 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
165 159540057 ILOT 57, MAP 12829 91-292096 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
166 159540058 ILOT 58, MAP 12829 91-292096 14,267.85 13,049.61 11,250.46
2,368,463.10 2,166,235.26 1.867,575.73
167 159539039 1 EXEMPT 0.00 0.00 0.00
168 159540059 1 EXEMPT 0.00 0.00 0.00
169 159538121 1 EXEMPT 0.00 0.00 0.00
170 159538120 1 EXEMPT 0.00 0.00 0.00
171 159540060 1 EXEMPT 0.00 0.00 0.00
172 159503015 1 EXEMPT 0.00 0.00 0.00
173 159503016 1 EXEMPT 0.00 0.00 0.00
174 159503017 1 EXEMPT 0.00 0.00 0.00
175A 159503020 ITOWNHOME PRODUCT 9,022.04 8,607.74
1 IT = 216 2,239,816.32 1.939,738.36 1,859,271.71
1756 159503020 ICONOO PRODUCT 6,499.44 7,236.98
1 Ic = 141 762,084.20 1.020,411.30 1,020,414.18
176 159503010 IEXEMPT 0.00 0.00 0.00
177 159503010 I EXEMPT 0.00 0.00 0.00
178 1 I EXEMPT 0.00 0.00 0.00
TOTAL ASSESSMENT 5,390,424.22 5,126,384.92 4,747,261.62
/fJ-Lj;2
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MFS
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
METHOD AND FORMULA OF ASSESSMENT SPREAD
The law requires and the statutes provide that assessments, as levied pursuant to
the provisions of the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", must be based on the benefit
that the properties receive from the works of improvement. The statute does not specify
the method or formula that should be used in any special assessment district
proceedings. This responsibility rests with the Assessment Engineer, who is retained for
the purpose of making an analysis of the facts in determining the correct apportionment
of the assessment obligation.
Upon completion of this apportionment of obligation, the Assessment Engineer
makes his recommendation at the public hearing on the Assessment District, and the final
authority and action rests with the City Council after hearing all testimony and evidence
presented at the public hearing. At the conclusion of the public hearing, the City Council
must take the final action in determining whether or not the assessment spread has been
made in direct proportion to the benefits received.
It is first necessary to identify the benefit that the public improvements will render
to the properties within the boundaries of the assessment district. The overall benefit
derived by the properties within the proposed boundary of the assessment district is the
construction of the public improvements, which will enable the properties to develop. The
public improvements have been previously itemized within Part II, Estimate of Costs and
relate to the following:
1. East "H" Street from Eastlake Drive to Mt. Miguel Road.
2. State Route 125 bisecting the southwesterly Salt Creek I Project Area.
3. Mt. Miguel Road from its terminus approximately 1500' south of East "H" Street, north
to Proctor Valley Road.
4. Proctor Valley Road from Mt. Miguel westerly and northerly out of Salt Creek I into the
County of San Diego.
5. Main Infrastructure Water, Sewer, Reclaimed Water and Storm Drain traversing and
serving single family residential areas within the boundary of the District. (Reference
Exhibits A, S, C & D for infrastructure locations in the Appendix.)
The assessment method and formula is based on the ultimate land use confirmed
by approved Salt Creek I Tentative Tract Map, Tract Map No. 89-9, and recorded maps
34
/v~f;>
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MFS
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
METHOD AND FORMULA OF ASSESSMENT SPREAD
(Continued)
for Unit 1, (Map 12827, 91-292094), Unit 2 (Map 12828, 91-292095) and Unit 3 (Map
12829,91-292096).
The properties within the assessment district boundary are currently under
development. Because of the interrelationship of the various public improvements needed
for development, the assessment district funding and construction mechanism is an
efficient way to fund and construct the improvements.
Spread Methodoloav
Project No.1: Project Grading
Project No.2: East "H" Street
East "H" Street and State Route 125, together with other major streets, are included
within the City's Development Impact Fee program, a program for financing the major
streets in the eastern area. The total eligible DIF was quantified to be $1 ,381 ,896.00 (Page
29). Project No.1 grading and Project NO.2 for East "H" Street are eligible within the
DIF (refer to Estimate of Costs, Project No.2).
District allocation costs attributed to included streets are a result of inherent benefit
to the future parcels to essentially provide transportation facilities. The benefit to the
properties within this District is that through each property's participation, it attains its
share of capacity in the eastern area circulation street system. Since these facilities are
a part of this program, we are applying the same methodology for benefit that was used
in the formulation of the Development Impact Fee program. Therefore, the assessment
levy against each parcel equals the amount of the Development Impact Fee.
The cost allocation will be spread upon the average daily traffic generation rates
and equivalent dwelling unit factors as established by the DIF Transportation Program
within Table 1, as follows:
35
JO-L/i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MFS
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
METHOD AND FORMULA OF ASSESSMENT SPREAD
(Continued)
TABLE 1
AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC GENERATION RATES
AND EQUIVALENT DWELLING UNIT FACTORS
ADT /Day
Land Use Density Per DU oer AC EDU
Single Family Detached
0-2 10
2-4 10
4-6 10
6-8 10
8-10 10
11-19 8
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
1.0
Single Family Attached
0.8
SDread MethodologV
Project No.3: State Route 125 (SR 125)
Project NO.8: Storm Drain System
It is proposed that SR 125 and the Storm Drain System (Exhibit "0") be financed
by the assessment district against parcels which receive the special benefit from the street
related improvements. The amount of the assessment against each parcel is directly
related to the average daily traffic generation or the usage of the streets indicated on
Table No.1. Justification of the need for these improvements is contained in the
development project's Environmental Impact Report, tract map conditions, the
Transportation Phasing Plan for the eastern territories and Eastern Area Development
Impact Fee (DIF).
State Route 125 is a major transportation facility required for construction to
provide a circulation system which will accept the cumulative number of trips generated
by new development in the eastern area of the City of Chula Vista. Through the
construction of East "H" Street (DIF) and State Route 125, another link in the overall major
street network is completed, thereby providing additional capacity in the overall circulation
network.
36
JjJ-'L/5
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MFS
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
METHOD AND FORMULA OF ASSESSMENT SPREAD
(Continued)
The Storm Drain System for these major transportation facilities has been allocated
from a storm drain system designed to mitigate the storm water generated from the Salt
Creek Ranch. The Storm Drain System specifically serving East "H" Street has been
allocated by Wilson Engineering in their Salt Creek I report entitled Cost Sharing Analysis,
August 1991. The Wilson report itemizes the entire area to be served by the proposed
system and its percentage allocation to those benefitting properties within the Salt Creek
I Project Area which is coterminous with the boundary of the District.
The Estimate of Costs, contained hereinbefore, reconciles the Development Impact
Fees for eligible DIF infrastructure. Other items of construction and incidentals which
were not eligible for DIF credits were made a part of this assessment district. Those
costs are to be spread to the properties benefitted using the ADT factors as noted in
Table 1.
The addition of applicable incidentals and financing costs were added to the DIF
for a total spread amount to the properties participating in the DIF.
SDread Methodoloav
Project No.4: Water System
The Water System is comprised of two pressure zone areas --710 and 980, as
defined by Wilson Engineering in their Salt Creek I report entitled Cost Sharing Analysis,
August 1991. The Wilson report itemizes the entire area to be served by the proposed
water system and its percentage allocation to those benefitting properties within the Salt
Creek I Project Area which is coterminous with the boundary of the District. Therefore,
the construction cost for the water system has been assigned to these benefitting areas
by their allocation percentage (Wilson Report, page two, within Appendix). Only those
costs assigned to the District are to be spread to the benefitted parcels.
Historical water demand factors for the land uses within the District have previously
been translated to Equivalent Dwelling Units the NBS-Lowry Water Subarea Master Plan,
February 23, 1990. The following shall serve to assign the assessment for the Water
System:
37
/0- if
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MFS
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
METHOD AND FORMULA OF ASSESSMENT SPREAD
(Continued)
Land Use Tvee
Assianment
Single Family Residential, Detached
1.0 per Dwelling Unit
Townhouse, Residential
0.8 per Dwelling Unit
Condominium, Residential
0.8 per Dwelling Unit
Project No.5: Reclaimed Water
The Reclaimed Water System to be included in the District consists of only the 16-
inch reclaimed transmission main. The total system consists of both 8-inch and 16-inch
transmission mains. These facilities are located within East "H" Street, Proctor Valley
Road and Mt. Miguel Road. As with the Water System, the costs of this project have
been allocated between the District and other benefitting areas. Per page four of the
Wilson Report --as previously cited-- the cost sharing for the Reclaimed Water Facilities
are defined as applicable to the District.
The utility of this system is of benefit to the entire District area for its erosion,
irrigation and landscape maintenance. Since the Reclaimed Water System will serve vital
erosion control and appurtenant slope maintenance, in combination with the landscaping
amenities, the spread allocation will be the same methodology used for the roadway
projects. This benefit assignment will be based upon trip generation assignment by land
use as defined in Table 1.
Project No.6: Sewer System
Project NO.7: Offsite Sewer. Proctor Valley Road
The number of units benefitting from the Salt Creek Ranch were estimated based
upon the latest SPA Plan and confirmed by recorded maps within the Salt Creek I area.
As with the Water System and the Reclaimed Water System, the Sewer System proposed,
including the variable diameter Offsite Sewer proceeding from the District Boundary
northerly within Proctor Valley Road into the County of San Diego, has been allocated
as it serves and benefits the District. Only those costs allocated to the District shall be
spread to the benefitting parcels.
38
)()-;(?
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MFS
as it serves and benefits the District. Only those costs allocated to the District shall be
spread to the benefitting parcels.
Historical wastewater generation factors for the land uses within the District have
previously been translated to Equivalent Dwelling Units in the NBS-Lowry Wastewater
Subarea Master Plan, May, 1990. The following shall serve to assign the assessment for
the Sewer System:
Land Use Tvee
EDU Assianment
Single Family Residential, Detached
1.0 per Dwelling Unit
0.8 per Dwelling Unit
0.8 per Dwelling Unit
Townhouse, Residential
Condominium, Residential
The cost of incidentals has been spread proportionately over the various
improvements in the direct proportion that the improvement bears to the total cost of
improvements for both the DIF eligible and non-DIF eligible improvements.
In conclusion, it is my opinion that the assessments for Assessment District No.
90-1 are spread in direct accordance with the benefits that the land within the district
boundary receives from the works of improvements.
Dated: ~q I
Muni Financial Services, Inc.
~I!~
David Keltner, P.E.
Director, Special District Services
39
/0-(;/
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MFS
~
~
t;
~
~
"
w
w
..
u
~
:! e
w
..~
ll;~
Ii
..
e~=
....~
..... >
..
-' ~ ..
llD-'
~ I- S!
~ z u
W
D '" ~
w .. 0
D ..
Z W >
~ :g t:;
.. .. u
~IB...I
e ri1 II
, W~
p~
..
t E ~
~ ~ ~ Z
A. en i
D
~ ..
-' w
~ ;iEC
u >..
~I;;:atw
2 g t;
.. i E
--~~-
~
..
I-
u
w
ci ~ at
.. W
~ ill
..
D
l:i ~.
~ ~; t!:!
i cl:1
~ w
..
t; ~
w ..
i: a:
Do i
*~il\l
2 III...
Do e
.
~ Iii
w
..
I-
..
I-
u
W N
i-t;
~ ::i
t; !I!
~;;i
~ ..
f>
~
on
:$
~
~
:a
~
~
~
II!
~
IC
~
~
~
~
~
...
~
.;
:0
:s
:::
D
..
~
..
..
~
.,;
8
.;
~
~
~
~
;Ii
~
I;j
Iti
~
!3
15
III
~
..
~
!i
~
;Ii
;Ii
":.
~
~
~
:0
~
!
..
~
.,;
8
..
II:
~
~
III 8
!:io
N,
on
III
~
;Ii
~
:i8
!tio
on
8'
~
I;j
Iti
~
28
~o
:s'
ll!
~
~8
"\0
":.U
~
III
~
~ 8
lllo
'"
i
..
~
!i
~
:l:8
~o
2'
;Ii
;Ii
":.
~
~8
~o
:i
~
~
la8
~o
.::
N
~
~
~
..
:::
~
~m
ei
~ ~
8
i!!
!o
W
-' '"
~ ~
e lli
..
..
!l!
~
~
on
"t
N
..
l-
S
D
~
III
~
on
III
iii
l-
i!!
iri
D
:i
&
8
~
-'
i:!
e :;;
. :!
2
~
i
..
c ~
W Z
~ ~
~ ~
u
i5
~
on
&:,
on
~
I-
.. u
~ =>
1;j 8
..
D ~
W
>< ..
~ W
~ ~
..
~
~
,
is
I-
U
=> -'
~ ~
~
'"
on
~
2'
,..:
.. l-
i!! Z
.i
D
..
~
.;
:i,
:i
~
~
D
la
~
l>i'
~
,..:
..
~ ~
i!!
-'
i:!
e
I-
u
W
i
~
I-
U
ill
li!
~
)O--'Ii
:l!
on
..
o
on
"!.
~
~
!:i
8
o
on
"t
~
s
~
,;
~
~
~
~
o
..
~
:0
~,
~
~
..,
~
f>
8
on
.0
8
~,
'"
f>
~,
on
D
..
~
..
;1.
IC
~
.0
~
.,;
ro
...'
...
~
N
~
~
'"
...
~
~
;;:
N
~
:::
Iii
i-
on
...'
~
..
i-
on
.::
~
~,
~
~
~,
~
~
o
...
~
o
t;
~
(
~
IC
~
...'
~
..
..
~
g
on
",'
..
~
~
",'
8
~,
N
8
(
N
..
~
.,;
8
..'
..
~
.,;
8
.;
I
8
i!!
8
8
~
!l!
.e
~,
'"
IC
",'
8
~
~
~
~s
D ~
!i ~
.. e;
:!l
~
:0
N
...'
;:!
..'
~
~
!li
$
on
III
~
~f
'"
on
~
..'
:0
!l!
.e
":.
'"
IC
...
!l!
.,;
N
~
~'
",'
8
~
~
~
!l!
~
~
on
"',
N
p~
6,.:f
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MFS
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
PART IV - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
BOUNDARY MAPS AND ASSESSMENT DIAGRAMS are on file in the offices of the
City Clerk and the Superintendent of Streets. Reduced copies of these maps are
contained hereinafter.
40
j().-fO
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
F
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No. 90-1
( SALT CREEK I I
FOR THE
\" CITY OF CHULA VISTA
", ..... ~NTY OF SAN DlECO. STATE OF CALFORNIA
....... -----
---.-- -;;..-;..-;-----
GRAPHIC SCALE
200 0 2DO _
~_..J_!.......J I
1__'
1_._'"
/
/
/
/
1//
11/ //
'; I
/ I
I I
I I
I I
It; I
I~I
1';:1
I" I
I '~I
//;-I
1tJ'1
I I
/ I
/ /
" / I
~"'d''''''''''''''' / - - - - .......--..
) 1.,.,./....
/r".,,~"'i'
'-
VICINITY MAP
-~
'_AI
RAClT___
...." _ 'Da7........
.......---
u.t. _....._
LEGEND
M..__...~"".~..,.,.CIn'
.. ~ NT'" "1"''' c--.....-.......
--~-_-. .....-
...........---.--- --
-------.--.....--
.__..........,.. .-...-.....
OUUl_....TIlI_......__ _
...-.,.--....-.--..
_._.. ._.na_PAClT_"_
-~-.-__.-..............-
---
--
......----......'"
@
....::@
--
-.-
_._.......___.._CIIf9..
-......... -..---.., -- -.
itl
CQW-~"-"""'''
MFS
Q,
..-
.:=,*
.-..
-
...... PfitANClAL SIIIVtcES. 1M.
....17.....
........ "'-
T._... . Calif...... 12.to
rntJ .........
..._-~
'"
SHEET 1 CW 5
.... J..
........:
..~
....... i
.
.
.
.
@
@
. .
Cl
~I
"'I
....
!!l
CI
51
..:
:Ii I
.
.
.
.
.
8
....
/tJ~51
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MF
GRAPHIC SCALE
100 UtCID
1>.--
--
......,
.-.-"
VICINITY MAP
......
MFS
.... .INAItCIAL sDY1CE8. .....
.ut7 .... .....
..--
,........ . C"'__ .....
"'" .....-
..
ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No. 90-1
( SALT CREEK I I
FOR TIE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COUNTY OF SAN IRGO. STATE OF CALIFORNIA
PIlOCTOII VALLEY ROAD
SHEET 2 OF 5
:......:....:..,.. I - - - -
:<, /OJ! 0101 ,10 0101 ,I I II
t . ....... ....... j ;; ; 0; 0; 0; @ @;
.~......... ......-....
1'.........
\
8@! @I @! @I @I @I @I @I @I @I @I I
......... I
... :.....:.....@I I I I I @ @II
... i.........::; @; @; @; @I @I @! @; @ .
I
@
-
@
-
@
-
@
-
.
.
.
>>
I
..\.
Ii @I @I I I I ""I @ @ .
.. ..\..... i "" "" ~
.......... '=' @ >eI
8\<< ... ..
Y. .............".--
....F.......:.:....
-
---....
LEGEND
____ ...-T_
--
@ --
ti'",~,.i,:l --
- .-..--
/ tJ -.5.2-
I
I
i I
I
~ I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MF
ASSESSMENT rnAGRAM
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No. 90-1
I SALT CREEK I )
FOR THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COUNTY OF SAN "'CO. STAT! OF CALFORHIA
Sl&TSOFI
-~. ~_...
-
..... ~
@
-
@ @ @
---
@
-
@
-
RIVERCREEK COURT
.
@
-
a
..
@
VICINITY MAP
..-..
LEGEND
---- ----
-........
'k-_-U-1' ,.
,......
,_.......
MFS
--
@ ..-r-
t'."'.~""d --
.. fIiIAftaAL. alllVtCU. ....
...." ... .....
---
T_.... . c.II.... tUto
- .....-
- ..-..--
'"
/tfJ- 5]
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
F
ASSESSMENT mAGRAM
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No. 90-1
( SALT CREEK I I
FOR TIE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COUNTY OF SAN IlECO. STAn OF CAUFOR....
SHEET40FS
_8IIIITlll'l
---
ItOC..&.If8 IUDGE ROAD
,
..
..
. ~
~ @l l
A - I .
~
i ~
8 N
II! ~ - i
.
i 8 I
. - lC
S .
- :I
@l ~ i
- 1 @l
- g
~ ---
~ -
---
@
~ -
--- ~
-
VICINITY MAP
-~
MFS
.... ~ .IIMCIL .....
.qat7 "'. .....
-.....
T_'" . c....... .....
"'" .....-
.'"
LEGEND
_",tiC lCAU:
" b"
~-- ~
--
'.-1
--.""
'1'
_ _ _ _ ..-w'_
--
8 --
r~i\f;~\;';~ ~.--
-- .-..-....
'{,Z>
/0- S-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MF
QIIAPtIC 8CAU
'~'!"
......,
._._n
ASSESSMENT mAGRAM
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT No. 90-1
( SALT CREEK I )
FOR TIE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COUNTY OF SAIl IlEGO. STAn OF CALFORlllA
~t.t.'"
.' ~
.-1/\
t.""'"
VICINITY MAP
-~
MFS
IIIUIII NIAtIOIAL 8IIMCD. .....
...,. RIo _
---
T__ . c...... HI"
fn4f ........
LEGEND
---- --
--
8 --
h,r...".;] --
- --.-...
IIEET 5 OF 5
/t9-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MFS
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
PART V - DESCRIPTION OF WORK
The general description of work to be acquired by this Assessment District consists
of the following:
1. East "H" Street: (proposed right-of-way to vary from 104' to 152') from Eastlake
Drive to Mt. Miguel Road; including, but not limited to, grading, street improvement,
water, sewer, storm drain, telephone, electricity, gas, landscaping and related
appurtenant structures.
2. STATE ROUTE 125: (bisected by "H" St. southwesterly corner of District) rough
grading, erosion control, landscaping and block wall construction.
3. Mt. Miguel Road (proposed 88' right-of-way): from Proctor Valley Road to
approximately 1500' south of East "H" Street, 44' right-of-way to include grading,
water, sewer, storm drain, and related appurtenant structures.
4. Proctor Valley Road (San Diego County, varying 60' right-of-way) to include
grading, water, and related appurtenant structures.
5. Offsite Sewer: Within Proctor Valley Road: Facility varies in diameter from 10",
12", 15", approximately 9819' linear feet proceeding from the within the District (the
City of Chula Vista) then exiting northwesterly within Proctor Valley Road into the
County of San Diego.
6. Main Infrastructure Water, Sewer, Reclaimed Water and Storm Drain traversing and
serving single family residential home areas within the boundary of the District.
41
/t:).-5~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MFS
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY Of CHULA VISTA
RIGHT-Of-WAY CERTIfiCATE
STATE Of CALIfORNIA
COUNTY Of SAN DIEGO
CITY Of CHULA VISTA
The undersigned, David R. Keltner, hereby acknowledges that the following is all true and
correct.
At all times herein ;mentioned, the undersigned was, and is the authorized representative
of Muni Financial Services, Inc., the duly appointed Assessment Engineer of the City of
Chula Vista, California.
That there have now been instituted proceedings under the provisions of the "Municipal
Improvement Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the
State of California for the construction and acquisition of certain public improvements in
a special assessment district known and designated as
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District").
THE UNDERSIGNED STATES AND ACKNOWLEDGES AS FOLLOWS:
a. That all easements, rights-of-way, or land necessary for the accomplishment of
the works of improvement for the above referenced Assessment District
have been obtained and are in the possession of the City.
X b. That all easements, rights-of-way, or land necessary for the accomplishment of
the works of improvement for the above referenced Assessment District
have been obtained and are in the possession of the City, EXCEPT FOR
THOSE DESCRIBED IN EXHIBIT "F" attached hereto, showing maps of
rights-of-way and easements not yet obtained at this time.
Muni Financial Services, Inc.
rRl!~
ASSESSMENT ENGINEER
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
42
/tJ?'7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MFS
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
Preliminary approval by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista on the ...LL
day Of~--t.-~ ,1991.
Final approval and confirmation by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista on
thed.~ daYOf\J~ ,1991.
43
/ () ~5~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MFS
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
Amended Final approval by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista on the
day of , 1992.
City Clerk, City of Chula Vista
44
J[)?~
ACQUISITION
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1
(SALT CREEK I)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
APPENDIX
45
)tJ,-?O
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MFS
..
..
o'\"iI"".
o
'"
I-
@
~
: w
etl-
: (I)
>
!::(I)
!!!=
:::w
)(1-
wet
;:
.
..
.
'lW.
,
,
, '"~'"
" \
, \
" ~-
" I
'. I
"~ I~'
x.. '''', ,/~ /
" ......1 ~/
" .L<<- /
, ,;s" (
,I ~,,..- \
/ ~ "
, b~,,""'" "
v, '
,
/z
I I I
I I H
. ! (
I. .
I d j I
II I "
I ClO
I ~...,
I I UlI-
!
i
r...! h
,,".:1.""
... =.1'
:; SH!
...:
-'
I!
~I
Je ~ (p
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MFS
--
--
--
.
.
al/OH 13nelW '.LW
Q't~
...
o
"
t-
@
:a
w
~
en
>-
. en
.
III =
: w
~
~<(
iii;=
%0
Xw
w~
<(
...I
o
W
=
,
,
,
\
, I
'~ I~f
, liijl
" I ~/
'-/ /
~(
~,,"'f'
/ ~ '
/ ,," "-
V/ ,
/-'7
. ~
I
=
I 'I
II.;~
. I ·
HIli
,
-.
I.
~I
I !
I
I Cl 0"
..........
ICIlI-
I f) ~ tc2
.
:
.
1
· h
rn · a .;
'"" ~n
..... iI!
~ ...::
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MFS
a\fOH ,iODIW "IW / .. .~.. ~I . ) ..
----1 ~ @ . . n @ ,f" \ 6 ~ ~
· -...~ -I@ \ : ~ ~
i: @ r :11!,... . 0 I- en'"
il ~ . (!D ~'''''' ~ a:~
ill 0 . -II \ \--~..... ......... ~ :c w-
I I- 0,- I "~:J,..... · . ~ x 3: ~
I ~ I . · \ t- W wu.
: _ II I = .\0 Cl)O
!: : : :, ..6
{ ~l' 1 : ~ /;; 'h..~ \ .-.-"- 61:%
i --- 0 (I 1<"@<<.\ ~ '\ -'" :0";'
Gi/::U~> .
J::l.. !
'<I) I !
I .~..... t-: Ioogj r I\.. ;..; ..., ..;.~ltJ'f..'..
!i ~ ~! ~I -\...0 '\ : /)~~)
i~' ~ :'- ~@/~.~~I~<J)::; <. ~m/
! I ~A' ~~)1l ~ _I _: 1 T~~. >.:.;. .. ""
I @ ~ ........" \
~ ~f@@\~ · ~.. -..... ',', I
11 ~ ~@ .L ~( . <Il/~;:.. """ '~" /J'/
I I \!I . \!I Ie\ IW\ ;.;";";.;,- :':'~.i~,;.:' X ......' c;;;r I
,. f ;;; I (iJ -!t ..L -rc'/' \l!I /))>;;;.~. , .....J /
" ~ U · fo) r--....~ .",......>Nr<' '-- :f!-/
I .00- ___ \ ~ ..,.>>...<,~.((,:<. ~ ~'Of' '-
,,8. ,
, :7 '
/ ",'Of' ,~....,
v. ,
. . . . . . . . . . . : .' .
......--.
:::::::".-::::,.-
.~..
:::<:;::::::
~~~ ! I
.,:,.;.:
l!!::~ II n I
i
m I I Ii
, i . .
,- z -.
. I l- I Ico
!I I
I I
. ....., .
I 101-
I I
! II
~. ..
/O.....?; - i Ii
:::;:sH
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MFS
~
"
!!
--
--
.
ayoli 13mmll "1'"
"'.
--I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I .
I .
, . .
I. . .
I
~ / . .
" I . .
I . .
, .
<:> I
.
<<<-:
:;:<= "
:;::>-::~~:~~ ........ .....
i~a ~~..L, ',' ~... <
," ....-:-:;.. ..:.... :;:;:
.....: .......... -:::.;.; :....
is....!... ... ... """"
.:::,::,::",::,,'.',,"." .. .
;:;:;: :::::
;:::;:::;::;::::
/
-'
z
-'
I!
!I
~
~
!!
~
.
N
-.';l't1,,'
::E
w
I-
m
: >-
!::lm
.
1-3:
-c:(
5!a:
:t:Q
~::E
a:
o
I-
m
()
'"
I-
@
~''I''''
.-'
I
! ! I
i I ! ;
. I . i
I II i !
I
I :
I
lQ~
VII/.'
I UlI-
.
5
i
'I
r:n .. ~~
~ ;,15
.... Hg
~ ....-
/ (J-- i/ '1_
....
...
...
...
..
..
..
..
~
~
~
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
I
Water Demand Factors
LaadUse EDU's
Residential, Single Family Delached 1.0/ du
Resideatial,. Condominiums .8/ du
Resideatial, Apartments .7/ du
Relail 7.8/ ICI'll
Commercial 5.6/ ICI'll
IndUSlrial 5.6/ acre
Church 2.0/ sile
Clubhouse 7.8/ acre
Visitor's Cealer 7.8/ ICI'll
Table 2
Pipe sizes and water demand factors for the 980 system were taken from the NBS
Lowry Warer Subarea Master Plan, FeblUary 23, 1990. The Black and Veatch Oray
Warer District Benefit Analysis, April 16, 1990, was used in conjunction with the
NBS Lowry Report to determine the extent of oversizing in the system. Funding for
the 980 system through Assessment District 90-3 includes the installation cost of the
minimum sized pipe necessary to service the EastLake Development only.
JSSlJANF:t1(U()()().X\lUM 20. J99J
38
J t9~t5'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
WilSON- ENGINEERING
WATER. WASTEWATER. ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
SALT CREEK I
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT
COST SHARING ANALYSIS
703 PALOMAR AIRPORT ROAD. SUITE 300 . CARLSBAD. CA 92009 . (619) 436-4422
tJ~?~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Salt Creek I Assessment District Cost Sharing Analysis
for Water and Sewer Facilities
.-.--
PROCI'OR VALLEY ROAD
10" Gravity Sewer Line
12" Water Line, 710
Zone
$6,468
$52,160
SAN MIGUEL ROAD
980/710 PRS and 16"
Water Line, 980 Zone
(N. of East H SL)
16" Water Line, 980
Zone (S. of East H SL)
Subtotal
10" Gravity Sewer Line
EAST 'If" STREET
16" Water Line, 980
Zone
srT ,294
567,500
594,794
$30,030
$175,530
S94,71S
12" Water Line, 710
Zone
Subtotal
5270,245
sso
169
169
381
381
SSG
169
632
o
o
300
2S3
600
o
o
300
6SS
3SS
300
1,182
469
824
o
681
47%
36%
21%
56%
60%
37%
./
36%
WATER LINES THROUGH SFD
10" and 12" Water $119,476 169 0 75 244 70%
Lines, 710 Zone
SEWER LINES THROUGH SFD
8' and 10" Gravity $98,064 454 632 0 l,086 42%
Sewer Lines
OFFSITE PROcrOR VALLEY SEWER
$l9O,OOO
10" Gravity Sewer Line
12" Gravity Sewer Line
15' Gravity Sewer Line
Subtotal
~~
577,000
S2lS,OOO
SSG
550
SSG
632
632
632
$482,000
......)SI;iS:i,i:37' \.3/'ly ".
612
802
1,642
o
634
31%
28%
20%
.::>Itnw,i;""
..i\.....i\...ill
1,505
469
1,794
1,984
2,824
/tJ,-~ 7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Iiz Long
August 2, 1991
Page 4
Reclaimed Water Facilities
The reclaimed water facilities to be included in the assessment district consist
of 8 and 16-inch reclaimed water transmission mains. For purposes of
determining the percent share of these facilities attributable to Salt Creek I, an
oversizing methodology was utilized. At this time, there is no accurate way to
establish the benefitting areas outside of Salt Creek I based on the projected
demand.
The oversizing methodology calculates the Salt Creek I share for all
transmission mains grea.ter than 8-inches in diameter based on the unit
construction cost; the unit construction cost for 8-inch ACP class 200 is $21 per
lineal foot and 16-inch ACP class 200 is $35 per lineal foot. Th'e following table
summariz~sthe reclaimed water facilities cost sharing analysis.
Cost Sharing Summary for Reclaimed Water Facilities
~--
EAST"H" STREET
16" Rcclaimcd Watcr Linc
$185,945
60%
PROCTOR VALLEY ROAD
16" Rcclaimcd Watcr Linc
$105,325
60%
SAN MIGUEL ROAD
16" Rcclaimcd Watcr Linc (N. of East "H" St.)
8" Rcclaimcd Watcr Linc (S. of East "H" St.)
Subtotal
RECLAIMED WATER LINE THROUGH SFD
$39,215
$24,808
$64,023
60%
100%
$11,472
100%
$366,765. ......".
JP-IP'?
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Liz Long
August 2, 1991
Page 5
Storm Drain Facilities
The McIntire Group, Inc. provided the information to determine the cost split
of storm drain facilities. The calculations in the appendix present the cost
estimate of storm drain facilities required for East "H" Street without the
development of Salt Creek 1. The following table provides a cost comparison
with the estimated construction cost of the proposed facilities (with Salt Creek
I):
Storm Drain Cost Comparison
li!1\ill;fl\,!,1'~!~:~,::+{1:~111Iililliltl!.<!,lilliiI, ~11!lfiill~,
East "H" Street
$347,901
$152,190
56%
1 Prepared by Mclntire Group, Inc. (See Appendix)
The Salt Creek I share was determined by taking the difference between the
costs with and without development and dividing by the estimate with
development of the Salt Creek I project.
/()~b'l
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
WILSON ENGINEERING
SALr CteUJo< .I
AS~Gs~ "wftJJT
D'$r"',c.r
C""''-GU'-A no,...J~
.<etz
e,v,orEA.
rA'-I'-' rt~
THe.
....rr.....CrlEO
....-
AAt,"A
AJO"nJ
I.DE,...nFleJ
me.
0..
SA""r
THE " 0 rH"AL.S "
Ctcc_ r
/N C,-c..w:. 64:)
IN
c:.ArGc.OA!:.....
L..e ~ Atc_~ r.
TH,s ...w.*... IS
IN THE
A 'a""'S_&"'I,/~r'''f!~''
C,.. T'N€ j/:lI.I'lWfllS.-tr.,.
l.o~ 4:.~r''''ArE
("JI rH'^J
0",., W"rG.A. D,,sR'P/cr """",eN
..."....
"'~
(J~n,........,.c.~.,
s",..., ~..... z: """""'0&.,..
IJa,., "',r ,.".'"' ,.,..,~
f,J;tfrGrt
p,..c"I.' ru:..:.. As $HG.....,,.., I 1?/I,$
AttLCIII I~ QllnD~
BE.n.-~
7/0 ~O""'4
c...
.,..-
~ q.C '!#IW~
"'c
EJ-evAno,J.
T:.c
...
(/~ '" IS en..)
, I
N""'4~ S
~~"~G
c-..,..",- P......... ,-"""",
A=
1'&.............. :
""SO..
D6SI""~1
E.Qv'".
~ L....ND V,s4 ,.~... VIVlrS
13 G.t::1.-404M~tIIJ:,1",- S".. (.S
Il.f /2.&:.s ID """AL. <::jOIl"'" /80
( z. -'-'l_
IS 12e..s /0, s.wr?A,- 2.Q M.. I&.O
( (;"",-.>
Ir.. IZJ;,.s ID t,'W.J T?""-' IS "'~ '0
(.., .."I....)
17 .tZUIQ(j,aJn~ 80
12""'''''') 'fa "c:.
19 ~S/.e-I'),,"- IS 04c:. .30
(z&>"I"..)
P/~~""""""" Z.
,M'S <: 78
(o.S ,"',,,.) / S C. Ac..
1077'11._ {i,5S ___m /0'" 7 tJ
"",,s-n..,J 711"'8 T :5AL-r CAE.C~ .I A'C-~!:';"""f:.;Jr Dls n(2./C"- -I,~~~:/d ;~:~~
.::1 ..~ I .. ~UI,,[C,.
I
WILSON ENGINEERING
I
I
SAI-'T WEE./'<. .r AS'::="'E~r Da.r.....~'r
"... ( ,
_A &.GS '::c:>>_ r: I
I
ft.tes ~
c'S5
t>,VID (;.::>
I
I
980
~.o:.
1-ANO No
13
1"1
If,
Ie.
/7
1-'
p$
MIS '-
I
I
I
I
I
I
{07'I'1..5
I
I
Nore
,,,.,"rs Mvsr 7'>f6roJ t!!Ss ,o;,~""Go-(.
BII:""'~
7/0 :-e -
nu:
f"HE
VI'J I ,...~
7/0 ita...... 9Bo _4 70,..,.:-
"5 0 ~.s
'-0 /2..0 180
/'fa 2.0 /(,0
0 6:>0 '0
0 eo 80
0 .30 .30
0 2- Z.
?,s '13 78
3 co ,"'''' 365 _or, ~SS """',,...
z :; '7.
30Q rJ,.. 'r:J
IN """'E
nt1'tr 0 IV '-7
'7/0 c",..,e
A.sSI.I"....~
I
p-zo,...,
!'Hi:
71iE
s,,.J c.1..&
I
rue
/0 __
.s..,sr~ ,or,...
/Se;.,..Jt!.t=,r
_e;<
""-,,,
~
DII'USt::.n_'7
I
/'co!'6&>
DO /'JOr
I
01= rue
AIf.~
7'D 4c.,...~,,...
Ie _.. 17- -I"" e.. ....Ar&A. I.""'E.:: 71Ho (d...
~/L.'"
IHrs I$.
1J!J1!:t:""'~
/>eI/6..o ",'-G;J1"; .
1'2- -,_en
I.' ,vt$$
"""OVID"
A
"-~,.,......
nM
S,~(i,,-~ ~/c-""
-."..-
"'IS
~;t-tT H S.,. ".,....
,M1(."IO~71
,1-':;('" ::.[~.,
"'s
nf€
;:::;..c/&.lr/~ ,N
s_
I
t.QS'7Z.8 I 7VA{! ]
.01""
..,5A40-r ~.ilJ:.E.1<. Z
ASSlZS$...-~_r D/~T<<'r::.'-
':U8~EC'
(
"
..
'.
,"
'i
i
'. "", iA"'~iw ~..:. \. "'--- ~~
2'O::..Fk,M >..W~~c)~ ~N",u;.
~/~ . \ ...../:',..:.l:) ~'" ,_'''~''': J-......
'/I.I. ~;;~,''';4Ja., &.s.J;;/.4...
or! , i ~. )...,.j. ; . . . j! -
..., ~. ,i .:. VlY:7. '$fJ/IVSA..:. .iA~$Irs..
"'~' .' t. I", I~' /. ',-:~...J:.;.J" ~ '-.--
, I.ren. .;o..;>".r' CU.... oJ. , ~/.
~~, ;!:'t .:~ "\. .. .... ~.. \, ,\..f .
d." . .',:.. \ 'eM. '-C."F ~/'I,I"''I': f ,......
a .'" ..~ ,., ..- ".1'
_~. .. .:. \. ~~~~. \" ....l,"- H;!'~,; !/'," /
. " . '. . ..... ,..~..r. . .~.
".."'\. .", . __ . .,. . I" ,~;.J .
'.. "'_. . -.- . .._'" ~ ~. -~;.I'f": ..-'
". .' ...._._~. ":-'--~." j 1"io
.. ,'.. ..- ....... ~ _."-' ........j. ;._,
.~~..;.; _. ':~~~~'~_~.,.J' .....
, .' ...:~
'.. i
. ~
r;:...
f.' ~.:
.....;,.:....
"',,,
. 1i"
It. .
I' ,.-" ~
.-,r -,. '- .
i
~/. ef
....r'-A...:
j. I':
,.. .1 I;
j i'
t~.
I
"
-;:'1
"
.
,-.
,.
'.
.>
:0"
,"
i
.' \
-.
,-':,:i '.
. C. \,
--.--'
,
i
"
.! .~
\
.
'--...
~
"
_....
r::'
,
'. ,< . ..: .9'{
.'. ;, ,:
. J'f ,
. SA!-Tf 9R~
:..-/., RA'ftCH- J
/ '. ;" t
! '
!
t
,
!
.
.:~
i
I
1
t
,
i
.
. ,
... j .
.. : "
~E
- -j"
I
I
/
!
i'
r
,"
, '
...
j
i
1
$7,
;;
,. ----'-.-..-
~"'-:'''' ". " . . . '" "",...
,..' ~,".
'''r~r'' :,., : .. -
. .'. . oJ ~;C .....:.--:
''-:8'0;,1/ .
"." . ' \ :'_ . -:-;6.,
...."."'.
. ~'.'
1,';'/
", I
//: !
I,
~.i}..
I;:.'
.;. I.
." .
. ,..-...
.
--
i"
,!:
/.,:'
"Ii/.
,"j//" .
1/:
I"
,,'
, . :'/1
,6'14 /1
. ,.: M\' .. ....:... ~.jf/'C
::. . J ; . - 'I'
_:0. . l.1
L<., ,": ""If
~~'" 1> "fA ,.'
: !\" .''1 .~\ '.." /"'_)',;~: . -.......
..1.'. r.,: 9' .. ,Qf ~S6\..''''
! '.\ ('\( ~Bo.C)~~o..kyL;
,. I' ..\ /' "" /
;~~'__)8t1~'~isJ0~'7~
:.:J ' ..../ . .SallND ~fIt:Y
....
-.:.
, /
(1
.\.
r --
. \
1 .
/ \
, '\
I .
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
7/ U/91
STORM DRAIN COST COMPARISON
FOR EAST "~" S'rREE'l'
.
STO~~ DRAIN COST
W!=~OTJT SA!.!' CR!~ !
DE'TE!..OP!mlT
-----~-------------
tmIT
COST
TOTAL
T'Tt~'"
.....-.
Q11..7Ur!:!TY . lJNn'
------~---------------------------------------------
'''''u RCP 6ao r.: $43.00 $29,240
.0
i
21" RC2 550 !.F $45.00 $29,250
30" RCP 150 u- $65.00 $9,7150
!
,
42" RcP .330 LF $75.00 $24,750
I
l'I'"INGWALLS 4 EACH $2,500.00 $10,000
,
!
emU! ;"lLET 8 :E..~CH $3,500.00 $28,000
,
CLEANO-p'l'S 6 EACH $3,000.00 $18,000
!
RIP RAP 80 CY $40.00 $3,200
----------
TOTAL: $152,190
,
,
I
i
I
.
,. ?tz.e.P~~ B'f TH& ~ c.,J:,.J rltLG GteQutl' lIVe.
I .
I
I
I
!
I
)&~?Yi
I
I
i
,
i
I
r
I
I
i
r
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I-
!
I
i
I
!
i
I
i
,
,
I
(
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
,
I
I
I
r
I
I
I
I
I
I
:I'/-"f).
.,~' ..
,,~.....
I
I
I
I
QRAPHlC SCALI
1~ 9 ,1~ :JllO
~_~_ I
....,.,
t_._n
I
I
I
I
I
I
VICINITY MAP
-~
MFS
I
MUM ....ANClAL *BfYtcl:I. .....
.tU17 IItII .....
....... .....,
T._.... . c....... oal"
,rut .--.an.
I
,.'"
I
EXHIBIT .. F'
@l
LEGEND
- - - - --
.--
@
--
I:-:'~:'::/l -~--
-- ...-..-...
..
C
o
II:
....
..
=
"
5i
..:
:I
ItJ-?Y
RESOLUTION NO. /~ 7/"
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING CHANGES AND
MODIFICATIONS IN PROCEEDINGS AND ASSESSMENTS
IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1 (SALT CREEK I)
WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
has previously adopted its Resolution of Intention and confirmed an
assessment for certain works of improvement in a special assessment
district, pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Municipal
Improvement Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the Streets and
Highways Code of the state of california; said special assessment
district known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1 (SALT
CREEK I) (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment District"); and,
WHEREAS, subsequent to the confirmation of the assessment and
after the improvements were ordered, but during the pendency of these
proceedings, it appears to be in the best public interest to order
certain changes and modifications to the proceedings, the Engineer's
"Report", and certain individual assessments; and
WHEREAS, at this time an amended Engineer's "Report" and assess-
ment roll have been submitted showing the reduction of certain of the
assessments reflecting final costs of construction of the works of
improvement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2. That it is hereby ordered that the changes and
modifications to be made are generally described as those modifica-
tions and amendments to certain of the assessments as set forth in
the amendment to the Engineer's " Report ", and for further particu-
lars, reference is made to amended Engineer's "Report" herein
approved, a copy of which is on file in the Office of the City Clerk,
with the original as modified recorded in the Office of the Superin-
tendent of streets.
SECTION 3. That said changes and modifications are hereby
ordered pursuant to the provisions of Section 10352 of the Streets
and Highways Code and said changes and modifications will not result
in the increase in any individual assessment or result in the inclu-
sion of any properties not originally within the boundaries of the
Assessment District.
SECTION 4. That said changes and modifications, as so ordered,
are to the best interests of the property owners within the bounda-
ries of the Assessment District and the assessment roll and
Engineer's "Report", as modified, shall now stand as the "Report" for
all subsequent proceedings relating to this Assessment District.
111/1- /
v
Resolution No.
Page 2
SECTION 5. That no public hearing is req-..lLred for these changes and
modifications inasmuch as said modifications meet the intent and require-
ments of said Section 10352 of the Streets and Highways Code, and it is
further hereby determined that said changes and modifications are in the
best public interest and convenience for the Assessment District and the
property owners affected thereby.
SECTION 6. That said changes and modifications wi.ll cause a reduction
in certain assessments as set forth in the approved "Report" of the
Engineer. The amount of reduction and credit given to the respective
properties as set forth should be shown on the "Paid and Unpaid List", as
certified by the Treasurer, as a credit pursuant to action ordered through
the adoption of this Resolution. A copy of this Resolution, immediately
upon adoption, shall be transmitted to the Office of the Treasurer so that
said credit amount can be immediately added to said list; a copy of said
list shall be kept on file in the Office of the Treasurer, with a duplicate
copy on file with the transcript of these proceedings.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
John P. Lippitt
Public Works Director
~
Bruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
/P/I-- J..
Resolution No.
Page 3
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED
of Chula Vista, California, this
1992, by the following vote:
by the City Council of the City
day of
AYES: Councilmembers:
NOES: Councilmembers:
ABSENT: Councilmembers:
ABSTAIN: councilmembers:
Tim Nader, Mayor
ATTEST:
Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ss.
I, Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No.
was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the city Council
held on the day of , 1992.
Executed this
day of
, 1992.
Beverly A. Authelet, city Clerk
1/),-9 -3
,.' \~
~.}
/j
RESOLUTION NO. It, 7/ 7
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING CERTAIN
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT BONDS TO BE SOLD AT A
PUBLIC SALE AND DIRECTING A CALL FOR SEALED
BIDS FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-1 (SALT
CREEK I)
WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
has previously initiated proceedings pursuant to the provisions of
the "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the
Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, and declared
its intention to issue bonds pursuant to the provisions of the
"Improvement Bond Act of 1915", being Division 10 of said Code, in a
special assessment district known and designated as ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT NO. 90-1 (SALT CREEK I) (hereinafter referred to as the
"Assessment District"); and,
WHEREAS, at this time this legislative body is desirous to
proceed to authorize that said bonds shall be sold on sealed
proposals to the highest bidder, all in the form as authorized by
law.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2. That this legislative body does hereby call for
sealed bids through a competitive sale for bonds to be issued to
represent unpaid assessments within the Assessment District, said
bonds to be issued in the form and provisions of the "Improvement
Bond Act of 1915", being Division 10 of the Streets and Highways Code
of the State of California.
SECTION 3. That the interest rate on said bonds shall not
exceed the current legal maximum interest rate of 12% per annum, and
said bonds shall be subject to all of the terms and provisions
relating to bonds as set forth in the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915",
and further as set forth in the Resolution of Intention for these
proceedings.
SECTION 4. That the designated Financial Consultant, KADIE-
JENSEN, JOHNSON & BODNAR, is hereby directed and authorized to
proceed at this time to call for sealed bids and solicit proposals
for the sale of bonds to represent all unpaid assessments on
privately owned property within the boundaries of the Assessment
District.
SECTION 5. That there will be furnished the legal opinion of
BROWN, DIVEN & HENTSCHKE, Attorneys at Law, approving the validity of
the proceedings and the enforceability of said bonds.
IPt:!-- /
Resolution No.
Page 2
SECTION 6. This legislative body does further specifically covenant
for the benefit of the bondholders to commence and prosecute to completion
foreclosure actions regarding delinquent installments of the assessments in
the manner, within the time limits and pursuant to the terms and conditions
as set forth in the Bond Indenture to be submitted and approved.
Presented by
ed
X'
John P. Lippitt
Public Works Director
Bruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
/l)lJ-~
Resolution No.
Page 3
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED
of Chula Vista, California, this
1992, by the following vote:
by the city Council of the City
day of
AYES: Councilmembers:
NOES: councilmembers:
ABSENT: Councilmembers:
ABSTAIN: counci1members:
Tim Nader, Mayor
ATTEST:
Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ss.
I, Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista,
California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No.
was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City Council
held on the day of , 1992.
Executed this _____ day of
, 1992.
Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk
v
\:,
d~
.0
- ~.,..~
lIP 8-J
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item / /
Meeting Date 7/28/92
Resolution: /J 7..< 1Resolution of the city of
Chula vista allowing the closure of Third
Avenue from "E" to "G" Street in order to
conduct a craft festival on August 23, 1992,
allowing the waiving of the Sidewalk Sales
Ordinance, and approving the waiver of the
Business License Fees for the Third Avenue
Festival
SUBMITTED BY: Director of commu~y Development C.).
REVIEWED BY: City ManagerJ6 ~~/5ths Vote: Yes___No-X )
The Chula vista Downtown Business Association is requesting
permission to close Third Avenue between "E" and "G" Street
in order to conduct the Third Avenue Festival on Sunday
August 23, 1991 from 10 AM to 6 PM. The festivities for
this event will include live entertainment along with a
children's amusement park, community activities, and 270
arts, crafts and food booths.
ITEM TITLE:
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Council adopt the
attached Resolution which:
1. Allows the Downtown Business Association to close Third
Avenue from "E" to "G" Street;
2. Waives the City's sidewalk sales ordinance; and,
3. Waives Business License Fees for vendors taking part in
the Third Avenue Festival.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable
DISCUSSION:
The Downtown Business Association is requesting the
following:
1. The closure of Third Avenue on Sunday, August 23, 1992
from 4 AM to 8 PM (A formal letter of request is attached);
2. The necessary Police and Fire Department personnel to
assure basic public safety and order during the event;
3. A waiver of sidewalk sales ordinances and business
license requirements for vendors taking part in the event;
and,
/1-/
Page 2
4. The use of various city equipment such as barricades and
traffic cones;
The Chula vista Downtown Business Association proposes to:
1. Provide a map to the traffic engineer depicting the
closure of streets and the flow of traffic;
2. Contact the Police Department to arrange for necessary
traffic and crowd control;
3. Work with the Fire Marshall to comply with City Fire
Department requirements;
4. Coordinate a meeting between the County Health
Department and food vendors to assure compliance with County
Health Codes;
5. Officially notify all businesses affected by the street
closure;
6. Contact Public Works to arrange for barricades and
posting of no parking signs 24 hours in advance of the
closure;
7. Provide for: trash and litter control during the event,
cleaning the streets at the end of the Festival and
coordinate final street sweeping with the Public Works
Department following the Festival;
8. provide, to the city, a certificate of general liability
insurance in the amount of one million dollars ($1,000,000),
which names the City of Chula vista as additional insured;
and,
9. Execute the City's Hold Harmless Agreement.
ANALYSIS:
Since closing Third Avenue will affect the flow of traffic
in the downtown area, staff has contacted the city's Traffic
Engineer, and he has prepared a plan which specifies how
traffic must be managed on sunday, August 23, 1992. When
staff spoke with the Traffic Engineer, he stated that the
street closure would not be a problem if the Downtown
Business Association followed the plan he prepared for them
for last year's Festival. The Downtown Business Association
has been given the plan, and they have agreed to abide by
it.
/1-.,2
Page 3
Since closing Third Avenue also will affect the City Transit
System, staff also talked with the Transit Department, and
they have agreed to the closure as long as "E" and "G"
Streets remain passable for traffic. The Downtown Business
Association is aware of this stipulation.
The Downtown Business Association has also requested that
the Business License Fees be waived for The Third Avenue
Festival. In the past, the city has waived the Business
License Fees for vendors taking part in the one day event in
order to encourage participation. The Festival is expected
to attract thousands of people as well as promote the
downtown. If the fees are not waived, each individual
vendor will be charged $37.50 or $26.25, depending upon
whether the vendor lives in Chula vista, plus whatever the
Downtown Business Association is charging for booth fees,
and the combination of these fees could discourage vendor
participation. Since having a large number of vendors will
help insure the success of the Festival, benefit the Town
Centre Redevelopment Area, and the city in general, staff
recommends the waiver.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
It is recommended that the city Council approve the Downtown
Business Association's requests subject to the following
conditions:
1. The Downtown Business Association shall provide,
fourteen days prior to the Third Avenue Festival, evidence
of general liability insurance in the amount of $1 million,
in the form of a certificate of insurance and policy
endorsement, naming the City of Chula vista as additional
insured;
2. The Downtown Business Association shall execute an
agreement to hold the city harmless from any liability
stemming from Festival activities in the street;
3. The Downtown Business Association shall provide for
adequate traffic and crowd control, as determined by the
Police Department, the cost of which will be paid for by the
Downtown Business Association;
4. The Downtown Business Association shall provide for
adequate litter control during and after the event including
professional street sweeping. Expenses for this
service shall be paid by The Downtown Business Association;
and,
1/-3
Page 4
5. The Downtown Business Association must notify all
business people and residents affected by the street closure
ten days prior to the event.
FISCAL IMPACT: The City will incur the administrative costs
of processing this request and coordinating the use of
various City equipment. The Downtown Business Association
will pay for costs related to the special police for
traffic/crowd control; public works personnel for trash
control, street cleaning, sidewalk cleaning and any
additional costs or labor; and any additional services
provided by the City.
(c:\shell\dbaclos2)
/ /-'/
RESOLUTION NO. / d> ')t:K '7
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ALLOWING THE CLOSURE
OF THIRD AVENUE FROM "E" TO "G" STREET IN ORDER TO CONDUCT A
CRAFT FESTIVAL ON AUGUST 23, 1992, ALLOWING THE WAIVING OF
THE SIDEWALK SALES ORDINANCE, AND APPROVING THE WAIVER OF
THE BUSINESS LICENSE FEES FOR THE THIRD AVENUE FESTIVAL
WHEREAS, the City Council of the city of Chula vista
established a Business Improvement Area on November 16, 1971
which created the Downtown Business Association; and
WHEREAS, the Downtown Business Association has
requested to close Third Avenue from "E" to "G" Street in
order to conduct The Third Avenue Festival or craft fair on
August 23, 1992; and
WHEREAS, the Downtown Business Association has
requested a waiver of the City'S Sidewalk Sales,Ordinance so
that the Downtown Business Association can conduct The Third
Avenue Festival; and
WHEREAS, the Downtown Business Association has also
requested a waiver of the Business License Fees for vendors
taking part in The Third Avenue Festival; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city Council of
the city of Chula vista approves the closure of Third Avenue
on August 23, 1992 for the purpose The Third Avenue Festival
subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit A; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City
Council of the city of Chula vista approves the requested
waiver of the city's Sidewalk Sales Ordinance so that the
Downtown Business Association can conduct the Third Avenue
Festival on August 23, 1992; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City
Council of the city of Chula vista approves the requested
waiver of the City'S Business License Fees for all vendors
taking part in the Third Avenue Festival on August 23 1992.
U"4 ~~~.~/
Chri iilomone
Director of Community Development
APrvedit m:Q
Bruce M. Boogaar
City Attorney
Presented by:
(C:\shell\dbareso.doc)
//-3
,
Exhibit A
Conditions of Approval for the Closure of Third Avenue on
August 23, 1992 by the Downtown Business Association
1. The Downtown Business Association shall provide,
fourteen days prior to the Third Avenue Festival, evidence
of general liability insurance in the amount of $1 million,
in the form of a certificate of insurance and policy
endorsement, naming the city of Chula vista as additional
insured;
2. The Downtown Business Association shall execute an.
agreement to hold the City harmless from any liability
stemming from Festival activities in the street;
3. The Downtown Business Association shall provide for
adequate traffic control and crowd controll, as determined
by the Police Department, the cost of which will be paid by
the Downtown Business Association;
4. The Downtown Business Association shall provide for
adequate litter control during and after the event including
professional street sweeping. Expenses for this service
shall be paid by the Downtown Business Association; and,
5. The Downtown Business Association must notify all
business people and residents affected by the street closure
ten days prior to the event.
~-~
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
/~
Meeting Date Julv 28. 1992
ITEM TITLE:
PUBLIC HEARING: - Conditional Use Permit PCC-92-40:
Appeal of Planning commission Approval of a Request
to Install Interim Fire station No. 6 at the
southwest corner of Lane Avenue and Fenton street;
Appellant - California Land Associates
Resolution Approving PCC-92-40
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Planning~~
REVIEWED BY: city Manage~Gc ~U ~l (4/5ths Vote: YeS_No-1L)
staff recommends continuance of this item to the Council meeting of
August 4, 1992 to allow city staff to review issues raised in the
appeal with the appellant and representatives of EastLake. The
appellant concurs with the continuance of PCC-92-40.
/..2- /
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item 1;5
ITEM TITLE:
Meeting Date 7/28/92
Public Hearing: PCZ-92-C: Consideration of zoning westerly
shore of Lower Otay lake to A-IOO - City of Chula Vista
Ordinance ~~~rrrOVing PCZ-92-C
f,:J"
Di rector of Pl an ~ f'" G-Lt'
City Manageri: (4/5ths Vote: Yes___No-X-)
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
The City of Chula Vista has ini iated the zoning of approximately 100 acres
constituting the westerly shore of lower Otay Lake to A-IOO (Agricultural
zone, 100-acre minimum parcel size). The property is owned by the City of San
Diego.
The Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that the proposal is
exempt from envi ronmenta 1 revi ew under Section 15305 (Cl ass 5) and Section
15303 (Class 3) of the CEQA Guidelines.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the ordinance approving PCZ-92-C.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: On July 8, 1992, the Planning Commission
voted 6-0 to recommend that Council approve PCZ-92-C.
DISCUSSION:
The property in question represents the area between Wueste Road and the
shoreline of lower Otay Lake, south of Otay Lakes Road, and generally consists
of vacant, undeveloped open space. The City of San Diego boat launch facility
is located on the southerly portion of the property, and the Olympic Training
Center Boathouse facility is proposed in the central portion, directly east of
the main Olympic Training Center (OTC) site.
At the time the City of Chula Vista adopted the Eastlake III GDP and the OTC
SPA Plan and prezoning, the area east of Wueste Road was intended to remain
unincorporated and under County jurisdiction. When lAFCO approved the OTC
annexation, however, they extended the boundary to the shoreline of Lower Otay
Lake in order to create logical service boundaries. This action added the
area to Chul a Vi sta I s corporate 1 imi ts, but 1 eft the property without any
zoning.
ANALYSIS:
The property is designated on the Chula Vista General Plan as Open Space. In
the text of the General Plan this designation is described as "Open Space,
Agricultural and Reserve," typical uses for which incl ude open spaces such as
floodplains and mountains, 1 imited recreation uses, rural residential, and
agricultural uses such as farms, orchards, pastures, and 1 ivestock raising.
The property has also been i dent Hi ed in the General Plan as one of two
north-south 1 inks in the Chula Vista Greenbelt -- the other being the Salt
Creek canyon and stream valley.
/3-1
. ~-'
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date 7/28/92
The stated purpose of the Agricultural zone is to "provide a zone with
appropriate uses for areas rural in character, which are undeveloped and not
yet ready for urbanization". The Agricultural zone is the most restrictive
that Chula Vista has, and with the "100" designator, would allow no further
subdivision of the property, nor more than one single family dwelling on the
entire 100 acres. The establishment of the OTC Boathouse or other
lake-oriented recreational use would require approval of a conditional use
permi t by the City Counc il (see compan i on report on Cond it i ona 1 Use Permit
PC-92-04).
Both the Chula Vista City School District and the Sweetwater Union High School
District have stated they have no special requirements for this proposal, but
if the zoni ng is changed in the future to allow for more i ntens i ve uses, the
property may have to be annexed to a Community Facilities District (Hello-Roos
District) .
FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable.
WPC 0400p
.
/3.;J-
t
, --
- -
---
I
~$-rvAk
, -
~~~
I
I
(Pv)! ~U~~T
r' AIZ-M
. I
i
;4i '<"1
" I 01" '(
~ )
/ €oil
Oil
I
" ,
--
\:
\
..
~
~T~
ilm...
~~TIf.Jb vllY:
go ~f.J 1:>1 ~t>:'
eoAT ~~ :
rAtA vi 'i'
/reO
U'Ni~
~VA1'IoN
.
,-,-EXHIBIT A
LOCATOR
~1~tIP~~~
UN~lW ~~ 'T'~ ~.ICO
IOO! A~~ Cl-l ~51"~~I,..Y
~ OF ~R dfA.'f I,..A!'-e
1~1 {
NORTH PtZ.-1~ - t- /J'~
-
- -....
~!!!I-..
-............- ....:
"o.l
'-4
;~
:~'...:":' " ."": r-- ---
h: <.>";~;/ ~.~ ,: /~>
-.. ~.- -. .' ~~
. c. ~
.,-~' :. ! ~P-,:l
. '~"!'f.'1 .,.", '
,~,,' it 1".....1"... "4'.' ,_' ~-
,~~'.c~'S~: ;:~.ll::""v'"
.:.\:}~~~;.l?;;:~~J: '
..~~~~;~~.. .;:-:;:.. :..~ "
"~-""-'-' :t'e.
. - ~:]i_. '.~~" '~->~::...~~<i. '.
..... 'JPj ........-.
~<:< ,.:.~: ~~'. "-\'~f,":-:~~-'..>~;.cJ
~"~".-... ""--1
'~~t:t::\1t~~~:~~~~l
, ..[~~;:~~~"~~"'}~;,
,
(,,~t-l~v ~ D~It.NATTON7l
NO~; (fv~~4~-c.- )
LOCATOR
)J-'1
.
",
EXTRACT FROM MINUTES OF PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JULY 8,
1992
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT:
Chair Fuller, Commissioners Carson,
Casillas, Decker, Martin and Tuchscher
1.
PUBLIC HEARING:
PCZ-92-C: CONSIDERATION OF ZONING
WESTERN SHORE OF LOWER OTAY LAKE TO
A-100 - CITY OF CHULA VISTA
Senior Planner Griffin said that the property includes 100
acres between Wueste Road and the shoreline of Lower Otay Lake,
south of Otay Lakes Road. When LAFCO approved the OTC
annexation, the boundary was extended to the shoreline of the
Lake to create logical service boundaries. It was not included
in the SPA Plan for the OTC and, therefore, was left without
zoning. The zoning proposed for this land is the Agricultural
zone which is the most restrictive that Chula vista has and is
consistent with the General Plan designation for the property
which is open space. Zoning is being proposed at this time to
allow consideration of the OTC Boathouse which is the next item
on the Agenda. Staff recommends approval of the zoning.
Commissioner Martin asked if this land was within the City of
San Diego? Mr. Griffin replied that it is owned by San Diego
but is in the corporate limits of Chula vista.
This being the time and the place as advertised, the public
hearing was opened.
George Hanson, 12598 Portada Place, San Diego, 92130, said he
wished to reserve the right to bring suit against the City of
Chula vista on this issue. This property has been unzoned for
two years and there is no special reason for zoning at this
time. The rationale for zoning is to allow construction of the
OTC Boathouse which he opposed. The A-IOO is for agricultural
uses, limited recreational uses. Those descriptions do not fit
the Boathouse. The zoning is completely inappropriate.
Providing zoning of this kind is completely prejudicial to the
City of San Diego who may well wish to'develop the shoreline in
the future.
No one else wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed.
MSUC (Casillas/Decker) 6-0 to recommend that the city council
zone approximately 100 acres to A-IOO as shown on Exhibit A.
Assistant City Attorney Rudolf pointed out that findings need
to be included before Commission approval. He asked that the
maker and second of the Motion to clarify for the purpose of
the record that the Commission has made the Finding that public
necessity, convenience, general welfare or good zoning practice
supports the proposed recommendation.
"
J:J-f'
.
MSUC (Casillas/Decker) 6-0 that based on the Finding that
public necessity, convenience, general welfare or good zoning
practice supports the proposed recommendation, the Planning
commission recommends that City council zone approximately 100
acres to A-100 as shown on Exhibit A.
.
13-?
-
~
/ :::1.,
1-, '''-..}
" File No,
PUBLIC HEARING CHECK LIST
CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DATE ., / U/q ~
I (
. lob ~ G
,AJCu..LO..!\-
~
SUBJECT
SENT TO STAR NEWS FOR PUBLICATION -- BY FAX ; BY HAND ; BY MAIL
1/(Y,/9d- - -
, I
MAILED NOTICES TO PROPERTY OWNERS
PUBLICATION DATE
Ve.~
NO, MAILED
d~
PER GC 54992 Legislative Staff, Constructi n Industry Fed, 6336 Greenwich Dr Suite F. San Diego, 92122
LOGGED IN AGENDA BOOK
2.--
COPIES TO:
Administration (4)
Planning .,/
~
Originating Department
Engineerin~
Others
City Clerk's Office (2)
./
~((,,(qd--
POST ON BULLETIN BOARDS
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:
.
.58.
B7
NOTICE OF PUBUC HEARING
BY THE CHUIA VISTA CI1Y COUNCIL
CHUIA VISTA, CAIlFORNIA
NonCE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL will hold a public
hearing to consider the following:
DRC-92-31: A precise plan proposing construction of 14
detached, single-family dwellings with attached two car
garages on individual lots served by private streets. The lot
areas and lot dimensions are less than those required for R-1-S
zoned properties, but project offers common open space and
recreation areas to compensate for the smaller lots.
PCS-92-01: A request for consideration of a Tentative
Subdivision Map, DATE-PALM VILLAS, to develop a IS-lot
subdivision consisting of 14 dwelling units on 1.98 acres,
located between Date Street and Plam Avenue in R-1-S-P
Zoning District in Chula Vista.
PCZ-92-C: Considering zoning approximately 100 acres
(Agricultural zone - 100 acre minimum parcel size)
constituting the westerly shore of Lower Otay Lake (the area
between the lake and Wueste Road, south of Otay Lakes
Road).
PCC-92-04: Considering a conditional use permit from San
Diego National Sports Training Foundation to construct an
Olympic Training Center Boathouse facility on approximately
3 acres located on westerly shore of Lower Otay Lake.
If you wish to challenge the City's action on this matter in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this
notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk's Office at or prior to the,
public hearing.
SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL on Tuesday, July 28,
1992, at 6:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue,
at which time any person desiring to be heard may appear.
DATED:
July 16,1992
Beverly A. Authelet
City Clerk
(~/l
;
.'
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL
of Chula Vista, California, for the purpose of considering zoning of
approximately 100 acres constituting the westerly shore of Lower Otay Lake
(the area between the lake and Wueste Road, south of Otay Lakes Road). The
application, filed by the City of Chula Vista, requests zoning to A-I00
(Agricultural zone - 100 acre minimum parcel size). The proposal is exempt
from environmental review under Class 3(a) of the CEQA Guidel ines. A plot
plan and legal description is on file in the office of the Planning Department.
The City Council reserves the right to make any of the following
recommendations: (1) That this property be placed in the zone proposed; (2)
That this property not be zoned; or (3) That this property be placed in any
other more restrictive zone described and defined in Title 19 of the
Chula Vista Municipal Code and which, in the opinion of the City Council, best
serves the public interest. Any petitions to be submitted to the City Council
must be received in the City Clerk's office no later than noon of the hearing
date.
If you wish to challenge the City's action on this rezoning in court, you may
be 1 imited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the
public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence
delivered to the City Clerk at or prior to the public hearing.
SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL on Tuesday, July 28, 1992
at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building, 276 Fourth
Avenue, at which time any person desiring to be heard may appear.
DATED: July 15, 1992
CASE NO. PCZ-92-C
WPC 0408p
(;;/ 1
_. ~ -? V '-----.. / '
.....:~...... -- ....
...
''>>~=-oltll:>
,~
:t&ac:;:::~
..~~
~
~
I
~~~
,
~~~
i
I
.' (PV)!
I
--
,',
, '
\:
\
-.
- -
'-
-,
---
~u~ u.. T
A~
J
o'f ,."
If ESE
~
'fiE. '
o
\.
~
~
iJm..
..
~\I?TI~ ClITY ,
g~I--IDl~:'
~AT~:
fAlAv 't..
/reO
U'Nrc?UA...
~YA'11?N
I
1<>0 i A~7 c?-l W~7'i~f'.l,.Y
tJ.m Cf ~e.R ~ A.y (,A~
1~1
NORTH ( Ptz. -1... · to
LOCATOR
'U'NI~ &IF ~12f2.~
1 Uf-l'UN~ ~p rt> A-Ia? _,
.' -
. ", ~ ~-, '.'." ..".
-':: .^'~"'"
.;;j::f'"
Wi'
l.
29lI'-r) 600' CV aSJS3. OJ,AJ City'of San Diego Lakes COITlll.
Wg!J 2fg.~O~ ~~~J,O ~x[M :njjA c/o Jim Brown .
i'SOJ tnWlV;;t;::- ';2:i'!f~SJ?q C?il!
VHu: rgn~6U q.i;.rt8\QJ"Jj? [reM
D6bf Ot. bJ 9.iUfiJJ f,:.rs.~~f\i<f<; ~~,
aA'n-~ggi'9B _
Western Salt Co
--
Paul Crawford
Prop. Dept
City of San Diego
A. Hix Plng. Dept. City of
S.D., City Adm. Bldg.
Laurie McKinley
, J. Willett c/o G. Hanson
Chr. Cit. Adv. Comm. O.V. Reg
. Park
Dept of Planning & Land Use
ttn: Lauren Wasserman
Lou Ann Holmes
~
i George Hans
I
i
I
I Ski p Bowman
City of San Diego
Water Utilities De~t.
City of San Diego
ert Dept.
.
County of San Diego
,Dept. of Public Works
'Attn: Sharon Reid, Deputy Dir.
I
I
Sweetwater Union H.S. Dist.
Sil va
C
I
I
Otay Water District
Attn: Bart Mumford
Chula Vista Elementary School
Dist.
Attn: Kate Shurson
c...
Baldwin Vista Associates L P
c/o Baldwin Builders
City of San Diego
c/o Pro ert Dept
City of San Diego
Attn: Bob Colli ns
QsH
n02n6H .a 0'0 jj9fflW .~
.V.O .m~oJ .vbA .J!J .1rlJ
x1E'l
rq EbeS100 aeeSI
OEIse AJ ,oe910 n62
29U ~IMP:1"E-t~ ~~rro:-5rq TO Sq90
~~6~f~~~~~~~;J:;>~~~~~U5l:~?~~
vtfU: Wj~6 .oiJ-C' 0 norjeS? rr~~
rv~co E~I~e AJ .ogsrO no.
/2/((
~,-'Y ~~ .,'.-..-.....,'.--..-.''''"
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item~.4
Meeting Date 7/28/92
Report:
ITEM TITLE: Consideration of the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact
Report for the Olympic Training Center Boathouse, EIR-90-12
(SCH #90010709)
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Planning ~~
REVIEWED BY: City Manager ~Gt ~~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes___No~)
The Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) now before you for
certification is a supplement to the Olympic Training Center (OTC) Sectional
Planning Area (SPA) Plan SEIR (City of Chula Vista EIR-89-11, certified in
April 1990) which addressed the environmental consequences of the overall OTC
project, and supplemental to the EastLake III General Development Plan EIR
(certified in November 1989). The SEIR is an analysis of the potential
envi ronmenta 1 impacts associ ated wi th impl ementat i on of the proposed
condi t i ona 1 use permi t and the construction and operat ion of the Olympi c
Training Center Boathouse.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council certify that the Final SEIR (90-12) has been
prepared in accordance with CEQA, the State of California CEQA Guidelines and
the Environmental Review Procedures of the City of Chula Vista.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION:
Resource Conservation Commission
During the public review period (May 18, 1992) for the Draft SEIR, the
Resource Conservation Commission (RCC) considered the document. They made no
comments on the Draft SEIR and voted unanimously to recommend to the Planning
Commission that the SEIR be certified.
Plannino Commission Consideration
On June 17, 1992, the Planning Commission held a public hearing to receive
comments on the Olympi c Trai ni ng Center Boathouse Envi ronmenta 1 Impact Report
(Draft SEIR) and the Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program. The Planning
Commi ssi on recommended cert i fi cat i on of the Fi na 1 Suppl ementa 1 Envi ronmenta 1
Impact Report on July 1, 1992, and recommended that Council adopt the CEQA
Findings and Overriding Considerations on July 8, 1992.
City of San Dieoo Council Consideration
The San Diego City Council certified the Final EIR and Mitigation Monitoring
Program and adopted the CEQA Findings and Overriding Considerations on July 8,
1992.
/1/1 ~I
"
Page 2, Item ,1~~
Meeting Date~
DISCUSSION:
This Supplemental Env.ironmental Impact Report (SEIR) is a supplement to the
EastLake III General Development Plan EIR (Chula Vista Number 89-9) and the
Olympic Training Center SPA Plan EIR (Chula Vista Number 89-11). The SEIR is
an analysis of the potential environmental impacts associated with
implementation of the conditional use permit and the construction and
operation of the Olympic Training Center Boathouse.
The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit for the construction of a
boathouse on 3.7 land acres and 0.07 water surface acres. The boathouse is a
13,496 square foot facility which will consist of three separate buildings and
average 14 feet in height. The boathouse wi 11 i ncl ude: boat/canoe/kayak
storage, a repair shop, equipment and storage, lockers/showers and offices, a
deck, dock, and parking lot.
DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS
This SEIR will be reviewed and considered for the approval of a conditional
use permit for the proposed facility.
CONTENTS OF THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT:
The Final SEIR contains responses to comments received during the public
review period, including comments made at the Planning Commission Public
Hearing of June 17, 1992, on the Draft SEIR. The comments and responses to
comments on SEIR (January 1992) and recirculated Draft SEIR (April 1992) are
located in Section 2 of the FEIR. The document was recirculated in order to
address the environmental impacts of the dock (which the appl icant determined
would be part of their project description) and also to address recreational
compatibil ity issues raised by the City of San Diego Lakes Committee. As a
result of comments received, some minor revisions have been made which are
noted in this section. Actual text changes to the SEIR have not been made.
The changes are incorporated into the document through their inclusion in the
Response to Comments.
Addenda
Section 1 of the Supplemental EIR document contains two addenda.
The first addendum analyzes the impacts of the refined project design which
reduced the height of the building from 29 feet to an average of 14 feet and
reduced the size of the facil ity. These changes in the project design were
made in response to the concerns raised by the City of San Diego Lakes
Committee and meetings with both the City of Chula Vista Design Review
Committee and the City of San Diego Facilities Review Committee as well as
further research by the San Diego Sports Training Foundation.
The second addendum further clarifies and expands on the reasons that various
possible significant effects of the project were determined not to be
significant and were, therefore, not discussed in detail in the EIR. (In
compliance with Section 15164C of the CEQA guidelines.)
IL//J-'d-
Page 3, Item
Meeting Date
J'/iJ
7/28/92
NOTICE OF PREPARATION
The Notice of Preparation (NOP) was distributed by the City in July, 1990.
The NOP and associated responses are included in Appendix A of the Final
SEIR. The following project issues were identified as potentially significant
and are addressed in the Draft SEIR: Recreational Use Compatibility,
Aesthet i cs/Vi sua 1 Resources, Geology and Soil s, Hydrology and Water Quality,
Cultural Resources, Biological Resources, and Traffic and Circulation.
PUBLIC AND AGENCY REVIEW
The Olympi c Trai ni ng Center Boathouse Draft SEIR was ci rcul ated through the
State Clearinghouse for a 45-day publ ic review period starting in November
1991. The Recirculated Supplemental EIR for the Olympic Training Center
Boathouse 45-day public review period started on April 28, 1992, and ended on
June II, 1992. The City of Chula Vista public review period concluded on June
17, 1992, with the close of the Planning Commission public hearing to receive
comments on the Draft SEIR from the public.
At the Planning Commission Public Hearing of June 17, 1992, no public comments
were made on the Draft SEIR. The State Clearinghouse did not receive any
comment letters from State agencies. Comment letters to the January 1992 EIR
were recei ved from the Ci ty of San Di ego Pl anni ng Department, Ci ty of Chula
Vista Engineering Department, Sweetwater Union High School District, Citizens
Coordinate for Century 3, San Diego Council of Bass Clubs, Peterson and Price
and George Hanson. Comment letters to the April 1992 Recirculated Draft were
recei ved from the San Di ego Sports Tra i ni ng Foundation, San Di ego Council of
Bass Clubs, Kevin Mineo (representing San Diego Council of Bass Clubs), and
George Hanson.
SIGNIFICANT UNMITIGATED IMPACTS
Since there are impacts which can not be mitigated below a level of
significance, a Statement of Overriding Considerations has been included along
with the Candidate CEQA Findings for the Council's consideration on the
project.
ANALYSIS
The following is a synopsis of the issues addressed in the SEIR.
1. Recreational Use ComDatibility
Impact Summary: Significant
but Mitigable
Otay Lake is recognized first as one of San Diego's water storage
facil ities. It is owned and operated by the City of San Diego Water
Util ities Department (WUD). The WUD thus has primary responsibil ity of
uses and activities on and around the lake.
J '-'1/9:3
Page 4, Item .I~~
Meeting Date 7/28/92
Uses of the lake (other than water storage) generally include: Fishing,
hunting, recreational row boating and other man-powered boating such as
kayaking and canoeing, sailing and navy helicopter search and rescue
training.
The OTC Boathouse project would include sports training activities
associated with Olympic canoeing, kayaking and rowing. The 2,000 meter
trai ni ng course and time tri a 1 s course wi 11 be located in the western
lower leg of the reservoir. The course which begins about 600 feet north
of the i nl et structure of the 1 ake and ends just west of North Poi nt
consists of a series of buoys in a double line, spaced 100 meters apart.
When not in use, the cable lines rest on or near the bottom of the lake;
when the course is in place, the 1 ines are raised to about 6 - 10 feet
below the surface. The training course will be in place all year, being
dropped to the bottom of the Reservoi r when necessary. Trai ni ng woul d
occur both within the course and in other areas of the lakes.
The above described OTC activities could impact the existing uses of the
lake, and thus present potential incompatibility impacts of the project.
Mitigation measures are summarized as follows:
Fishino Considerations
a) Duri ng fi shi ng season days (Wednesday, Saturday and Sunday,
mi d-January through mi d -October), OTC boats wi 11 not have exc 1 us i ve
rights to the use of the OTC time trials course of up to eight
1 anes. The OTC boats will have excl us i ve use of the OTC tra i ni ng
course (three lanes) on those days.
b) Boat course crossings: In the event motorized fishing boats warrant
crossing the path of a rowing scull/boat underway, the crossing
shall occur either in back of (after) the rowers, or a minimum of
500 meters in front of the rowers.
c) Fishing tournaments: OTC training activities shall either be
prohibited or restricted on permitted fishing tournament days
(occas i ona 1 Saturdays duri ng fi shi ng season; permitted through the
City of San Diego WUD).
d) Duri ng the fi shi ng season on Lower Otay Reservoi r (approximately
mi d -January through mi d -October), shells, canoes and kayaks wi 11 be
requi red to restri ct activit i es on the three days per week when
fishing is allowed (Wednesday, Saturday, and Sunday). The OTC boats
will rema in 150 feet from the Reservo i r shore 1 i ne on all fi sh i ng
days, except in the area deli neated in Figure 3-4 of the ErR in
order to avoid conflict with shoreline fishing activities.
J'I~~L/
Page 5, Item /'/ A
Meeting Date 7/28/92
Waterfowl HuntinQ Considerations
e) During the months of the waterfowl hunting season (approximately
mid-October through mid-January) rowing and paddl ing will be
prohibited during the hunting hours of dawn to noon on the two days
per week that hunting is allowed at lower Otay Reservoir (Wednesday
and Saturday). In addition, at all times during this season - in
order to provide cont i nuous rest i ng area for waterfowl - shell s,
canoes, and kayaks will be restri cted from act i vi ty in the Harvey
Arm of the Reservoir.
Other Measures
f) Special events: No special events/competitions of over 100 people
shall be allowed at the OTC boathouse or lake under this approval.
This restriction shall not include typical training competition
between OTC training athletes included in the OTC program (provided
that no more than 100 spectators attend). Any future request for
compet it ions shall be subject to CEQA revi ew and revi ew by the
Cities of Chula Vista and San Diego.
g) Publ ic education: In order to educate the publ ic of the OTC lake
activities and thus minimize use confl icts, the following items are
recommended.
An i nformat i on sign at the 1 ake turn-off at Wueste Road/Otay
lakes Road shall be posted, identifying the OTC facilities and
a radio channel from which lake use information can be derived;
The radio channel shall provide information on OTC activities
(i.e., training times, rules of the lake), public use
information (i.e., open days, tournaments, lake conditions),
ecological sensitivity of the area and associated protection
rules, and lake use rules which must be reviewed prior to boat
launching or ticket purchase.
At the City boat 1 aunch, prior to purchase of tickets or boat
launching, the lake user should be required to read and
acknowledge the rules of the lake. (WUD).
h) lake levels: lake level data shall be included in each Quarterly
Management Report (derived from the City WUD), to provide for
ongoing monitoring of the lake surface area available for use.
Should lake levels show signs of continued decline, the matter
should be raised with the Users' council and OTC, to determine
whether potent i a 1 refi nements to use regulations are needed. Thi s
monitoring and potential resulting actions should guarantee
equitable shared use of the lake.
IY./15
Page 6, Item 1'1 If
Meeting Date 7/28/92
i) Navy Rescue Trai ni ng: the USOC/OTC shall meet wi th the Navy to
determine an equitable shared use of the lake. It may be that
notification of the Navy to the OTC of future days and locations of
practice rescue will be adequate to reduce potential conflict.
j) Facility Management Plan (FMP): Prior to the issuance of building
permits, the FMP shall be revised to include the above mitigation
items. In addition, the following items are recommended to be added
to the FMP:
Dock operat ions and (lTC boat 1 aunchi ng ope rat ions should be
described. Provisions to minimize impacts to the surrounding
ecology (especially while launching) should be specified in the
operations plan.
OTC motor boats (coach launches) should be quantified
(estimated no more than 4 boats). Provisions for launching (at
the City launch site); storage (at OTC docks, and when to be
out of the lake); fuel ing and repair should be del ineated in
the FMP. Fue 1 i ng sha 11 be conducted us i ng the "pop-on/off"
tanks, which would be stored at the OTC main site and brought
to the boathouse when necessary. Only minor repairs should be
conducted at the boathouse.
Athletes, employees and visitors shall be educated regarding
the lake rules and, importantly, the sensitivity of the
adjacent ecology of the area. Parking shall be by permit only,
and to load/off-load boats. Signs shall further be noted,
subject to the review of the City of Chula Vista, at locations
along the lake (to be determined), to provide for public
education and protection of sensitive habitat. Maps shall be
posted at the OTC site which identify protected and/or
prohibited areas. Walkways and trails shall be clearly marked
(refer also to Biology mitigation, Section 3.6).
The OTC shall notify the City of San Diego WUD of any OTC event
requiring excl usive use of the course two months prior to the
event.
k) Quarterly Management Reports (QMRs): The USOC/OTC shall be
responsible for preparation of the QMRs. Information to be recorded
includes but is not limited to: daily use of the boathouse faCility
including number and types of boats used and schedules, any boat
crossing conflicts, number of athletes each day, visitors, etc. The
USOC/OTC, City WUD, and Lakes Committee or User's Council shall work
together to develop the scope, format, schedul e and revi ew/comment
system of QMRs. These three entities shall comprise the QMR "review
commi ttee. "
/tj/J-'~
Page 7, Item
Meeting Date
It//)
7/28/92
Items included in the mitigation measures above shall also be
incorporated into the QMR system. Future additional desired lake uses
which may be requested should al so be considered by the review convnittee
and reported in the QMRs.
Further, to obtain input as to the effectiveness of ongoing lake
operations, comment forms shall be provided to the OTC coaches, athletes
and site manager, and to the City of San Diego boat launch facil ity for
input from the publ ic (forms could be provided at the time of ticket
purchase, and filled out as desired by lake users). The results of these
convnent forms shall be incorporated into each QMR and reviewed/considered
by the three reviewing entities, or review committee (OTC, City of San
Diego and User's Council).
2. Geolooy and Soils:
Impact Summary:
Significant
Potential impacts include shrink, swell problems of the soil, causing
damage to poorly constructed foundations, possi bl e adverse, signi ficant
seismic impacts, potential for inundation by seiche on the Lower Otay
Reservoir, and project development increasing sediment load in runoff
which is likely to drain into the Lower Otay Reservoir.
Less than
Geologic and soil impacts will be reduced to below levels of significance
with implementation of mitigation measures including the project design
excl us i on of cl ayey expans i ve port ions of the Sweetwater formation from
the upper 3 feet of subgrade and selective grading, specially designed
foundations and erosional control measures such as maintaining vegetative
cover and revegetated buffer zones.
3. Hydrolooy. Water Duality. and Surface
Drainaoe
Impact Summary: Significant
but Mitigable
A major hydrologic concern in this area is the runoff effects on
sensitive areas such as the Otay Reservoir, most importantly the
potential impacts on the potable water supply of the Otay Reservoir.
With development of the project site, the area covered by the boathouse
building and adjacent concrete deck (total area + 40,820 sq. ft.) will be
rendered impervious to water. As a result, rainfall infiltration into
soil in this area will be impeded and overland flow would take place
readily over the relatively smooth impermeable surfaces. Grading and
ut il ity plans for the proposed boathouse facil i ty i ncl ude proYi s ions for
a drainage system which will divert runoff to a "soakaway basin" where
storm water will be filtered to remove particulate matter and dissolved
chemicals prior to discharge into Otay Reservoir. A great majority of
accumulated contaminants are removed from impervious surfaces during the
first 1/2 inch of runoff from a given storm event, which for the OTC
project site is equi val ent to 0.1 acre feet. Therefore, the storage
capacity of the soakaway basin will be a minimum of 0.1 acre feet. Since
1'//1-- ?
Page 8, Item ,,~~
Meeting Date 7/28/92
storm runoff in excess of this quantity is comparatively free of urban
pollution, flow occurring after the first 0.1 acre-feet will bypass the
soakaway basin and discharge directly into Otay Reservoir. Proper design
and use of these measures will reduce impacts due to increases in runoff
to a level below significance.
4. Cultural Resources
Impact Summary:
Significant
No project related impacts will occur to cultural resources. No
mitigation measures are required.
less than
5. Bioloaical Resources
Impact Summary: Significant
but Mitigable
Project development would result in impacts to approximately 3.0 acres of
Diegan coastal sage scrub and 0.1 acre of wetland that is primarily
freshwater marsh. Impacts to both these resources would be significant.
Indirect impacts to California gnatcatcher as a result of increased human
access and activity on the site is considered potentially significant.
Cumulative impacts include the loss of habitat and potentially occurring
sensitive species populations on a regional basis due to increased human
activity on the reservoir.
The applicant proposes to mitigate the high quality sage scrub and
disturbed sage scrub by planting 3.6 acres of Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub
on the two southernmost slopes on the west side of the Olympic Training
Center adjacent to the Salt Creek dedicated open space. In addition, all
areas di sturbed by gradi ng around the Olympi c Trai ni ng Center boathouse
and access road will be revegetated with coastal sage scrub.
Impacts to freshwater marsh habitat (0.1 acre) shall be mitigated
out-of-kind by planting native riparian tree species along the lake
margin, outside of the freshwater marsh fringe.
Implementation of the mitigation measures previously described would
reduce the impacts to a level below significant. The potential indirect
impacts due to possible erosion or material sliding into wetlands can be
avoided by careful construction practices and standard erosion control
measures. Potential indirect impacts to gnatcatchers will also be
reduced to a level below significant by reducing human access to the
coastal sage scrub on the project site with signs or barrier plantings
and by e 1 imi nat i ng access on the coastal sage scrub mit igat i on area on
the Olympic Training Center site across Wueste Road. The cumulative
impacts to resident sensitive species and loss of coastal sage scrub will
also be reduced to a level below significance with the implementation of
mi t igat i on to coastal sage scrub habitat and wetl ands. The proposed
mitigation areas shall be approved by City of San Diego and City of Chula
Vista staff in consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and
the California Department of Fish and Game. Implementation of the
;1/),8'
Page 9, Item
Meeting Date
1'//1
7/28/92
mitigation measures previously described and any additional
considerations specified in the Cal ifornia Department of Fish and Game
Streambed Alteration Agreement would reduce the impacts to a level below
significant. The applicant has applied for a U.S. Army Corps of
Engineers has issued a Nationwide 404 permit for impacts to wetlands.
6. Traffic/Access
Impact Summary:
Significant'
No mitigation is necessary for day-to-day use of the OTC Boathouse
facility. During small events (less than 100 people), shuttling of
people from the OTC main campus will be necessary once the OTC Boathouse
parking (38 spaces) is full.
Less than
Although ultimate buildout of the OTC project (including Boathouse
project) would have a minimal contribution to long term cumulative
traffic volumes, measures were incorporated into the OTC project to
mitigate cumulative traffic impacts to acceptable levels.
7. Visual Impacts
Impact Summary: Significant
and Unmitigable to a Level
Below Significance
Although the proposed landscape plan and reduction in the building height
from the original plan of 27 feet to 14 feet will reduce visual impacts,
they will not be reduced to a level below significant.
ALTERNATIVES
In compliance with CEQA's mandate to provide a reasonable range of
project alternatives, the recirculated DEIR included a "No Project
Alternative;" the OTC at the City of San Diego Boat Launch Alternative;
City of San Diego Facilities at North Point Alternative, the Shared
Site-Alternative and the Originally Proposed Project Site.
1. No Proiect Alternative
Under this scenario, the boathouse would not be constructed and the
site would be retained as open space/passive recreation. Under the
No Project scenario, the following identified project impacts to the
site and adjacent environs would be el iminated or reduced:
recreational land use incompatibility (with nearby boating/fishing
activities); visual/aesthetic effects; disturbance/destruction to
biological resources (0.4 acre of sage scrub and 0.1 acre of
wetl and); di sturbance of cultural resources; and potential effects
of sedimentat i on/eros ion on the adjacent water resources. The No
Project Alternative is, however, not consistent with the Chula Vista
General Plan, EastLake III General Development Plan, or Olympic
Training Center Sectional Planing Area (SPA) Plan.
Ji//} --1
Page 10, Item /tj~
Meeting Date 7/28/92
2. OTC Boathouse at City of San Dieoo Boat Launch Site: City Facilities
at North Point
This alternative proposes the relocation of the existing and planned
expansion of the City of San Diego boat launching hcil ity from its
current site to another City-owned recreational site across the
1 ake' s "North Poi nt" 1 ocated to the northeast. The OTC Boathouse
facility would then be developed on the City of San Diego's existing
boat launching facility site. This alternative was created in
response to an ident ifi ed potent i a 1 impact regardi ng the project's
conflict with existing boating/fishing activities now operating from
the nearby City of San Diego Boat Launching Facility. Although this
a lternat i ve would avoid the majori ty of the project's
operational/use confl icts between the OTC water activities and City
of San Diego recreational activities, the alternative would result
in more significant biological, archaeological, and aesthetic
impacts than the proposed project.
3. Alternative Location 2: City of San Dieoo Boat Launch (Shared Sitel
This alternative would result in the retention of both the proposed
project site and the North Point site in open space, reducing
biological and aesthetic impacts at these two sites. This
alternative would, however, result in more significant operational
impacts and land use conflicts (i.e., access, loss of public
parking, congestion, boat launching conflicts) than the proposed
project.
4. Orioinallv ProDosed Proiect Site
The originally proposed project site is located just north of the
currently proposed project site, closer to the water's edge. This
proposal, previously considered and designed in detail, involved a
two-story building with observation decks on the second story, and
access to the 1 ake from the fi rst floor's cement deck area vi a two
pedestrian pathways. Transition from the deck to water's edge would
be accomplished by a rock slope (2:1 slope rate) which would begin
at the deck's edge and extend to the approximate 475-foot elevation
at the water's edge. This alternative would result in the
destruction of undisturbed sage scrub habitat and wetland area.
This alternative was dismissed primarily due to biological and
vi sua 1 impacts.
FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable.
WPC 0411p
JLj/l,/tJ
:}k8//5."2
~tA..--tc.:f~m ./1-
United States Olympic Boathouse
San Diego Lakes Committee Chronology
Lakes Committee meetings where boathouse considered or discussed:
July 20, 1988
June 13, 1990 (4 voting members present)
November 14, 1990 (5 voting members present)
January 9, 1991 (5 voting members present)
March 13, 1991 (7 voting members present)
May 29, 1991 (4 voting members present)
June 3, 1991
February 12, 1992 (5 voting members present)
February 24, 1992 (6 voting members present)
March 10, 1992
March 25, 1992 (5 voting members present)
April 8, 1992
April 18, 1992 (6 voting members present)
May 5, 1992 (6 voting members present)
June 4, 1992 (5 voting members present)
Lakes Subcommittee meetings attended by Foundation staff:
February 20, 1991
February 25, 1991
March 19, 1991
March 27, 1991
April 15, 1991
May 16, 1991
Meetings\encounters with individual Lakes Committee members:
July 12, 1988, Mineo-Dave Nielsen
December 30, 1988, Mineo-Nielsen
January 11, 1989, Mineo-Nielsen
March 16, 1990, Brandenburg-Nielsen-Mitchell
April 11, 1990, Mineo-Nielsen-Mitchell-McKinley
April 23, 1990, Hanson-Mayor Cox-McKinley
May 15, 1990, Hanson-Miller
June 13, 1990, Mineo-Burgreen-Lockwood-Nielsen (Nielsen
confronts Mineo re planned demonstration at upcoming
groundbreaking. Mineo reluctantly agrees to call it off. )
June 16, 1990, George Hanson pickets groundbreaking/USOC Board
meeting. Signs include "ducks not docks" and "USRA go to
hell".
August 7, 1990, Mineo-Burgreen-Nielsen
September 27, 1990, Mineo-Burgreen-Nielsen
October 25, 1990, Curren-Nielsen
January 18, 1991, Brandenburg-Nielsen
January 23, 1991, Curren-Nielsen
)Z/~-//
January 30, 1991, Brandenburg-Jim Brown-Nielsen
February 26, 1992, Brandenburg-Nielsen
March 26, 1992, Brandenburg-Nielsen-Miller
April 8, 1992, Brandenburg-Nielsen
April 30, 1992, Brandenburg-Sadler-Nielsen
May 4, 1992, Curren-Nielsen
May 6, 1992, Nielsen-Mineo ( Nielsen presentation to Council
of Bass Clubs)
May 15, 1992, Curren-Sadler-Nielsen
May 27, 1992, Curren-Nielsen
June 2, 1992, Brandenburg-Nielsen
June 3, 1992, Mineo-Nielsen
June 15, 1992, Brandenburg-Nielsen
Lakes Committee Actions\Motions
June 13, 1990 (4 voting members present)
Hanson moved,Taramasco seconded, that Mr.
designated as the Committee's liaison and that
the Committee's:
Mineo be
he express
1. Opposition to construct use for training
activities and public recreation.
2. Opposition to permanent structures on the
shoreline or the surface of the reservoir.
3. Support of existing public recreation program
and users.
4. Support of the City Lakes Recreation Development
Plan with regard to future uses and activities.
(NOTE: THIS WAS SIX MONTHS BEFORE FIRST BOATHOUSE
DESIGN WAS SUBMITTED AND EIGHTEEN MONTHS BEFORE THE
EIR WAS COMPLETED. ACTION WAS TAKEN AFTER
FOUNDATION STAFF LEFT THE MEETING. FOUNDATION NEVER
OFFICIALLY NOTIFIED.)
2
)1 /l~/c?--
I
II
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0~\'t
Final Supplemental Environmental
Impact Report (EIR 90-12) for the
Olympic Training Center Boathouse
SCH #90010709
Prepared for:
The City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, California 92010
Prepared by:
Ogden Environmental and Energy Services Co.
5510 Morehouse Drive
San Diego, California 92121
~{l?-
iiMI!iiJ;
~~---------
""'-~~~
June 1992
CIlY OF
CHUlA VISTA
-)111- i}
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
"I
SECTION 1
FIRST ADDENDUM TO EIR 90-12
SECOND ADDENDUM TO EIR 90-12
ILj/}/Ie;
I
I
I
I
I
W
,
I
I
t
t
,
I
j
I
I
I
I
I
FIRST ADDENDUM TO THE
DRAFT SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
(EIR 90-12) FOR THE OLYMPIC TRAINING CENTER BOATHOUSE
SCH #90010709
June 1992
/L//!-6
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
1.1 INTRODUCTION
1.1.1 Purpose, Procedures and Scope
This Addendum to Supplemental EIR 90-12 is prepared in accordance with the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15164. The purpose of an
addendum to an EIR is to comply with CEQA in instances in which the EIR requires
"minor technical changes or additions that do not raise important new issues about the
project's significant effects on the environment", and where no factors are present that
would require the preparation of either a subsequent or supplemental EIR (Section 15164
[aD. "An addendum need not be circulated for public review but can be included in or
attached to the Final EIR" (Section 15164 [bD. "The decision-making body shall consider
the addendum with the Final EIR prior to making a decision on the project." (Section
15164 [cD.
This Addendum to Supplemental Draft EIR 90-12 evaluates the minor refinements to the
proposed project evaluated in Draft SEIR 90-12. A full description of the redesigned
project, explanation of project history and reasons for the proposed changes are provided
below, followed by an environmental evaluation of those impacts potentially affected by the
project redesign. The City of Chula Vista will consider this addendum, included in Final
SEIR 90-12, when making decisions on the project.
1.1.2 Background
A Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (EIR 90-12) for the Olympic Training
Center Boathouse was completed in January 1992. As a result of new, additional
information which became available during the 45-day public review period, including a
plan for the dock of the proposed facility and additional input from the City of San Diego
Otay Lakes Committee, particularly related to recreational compatibility, the Draft SEIR
was revised to incorporate the changes to the project design and concerns of the Oray Lakes
Committee. A recirculated Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) for
the Olympic Training Center was issued in April 1992. Since public circulation of the
Recirculated Draft SEIR, however, additional refinements to the plan have been proposed
by the Sari Diego Sports Training Foundation as a result of the input regarding the building
height from: the City of San Diego Otay Lakes Committee; meetings with both the City of
Chula Vista Design Review Committee and the City of San Diego Facilities Review
010571000
1-1
/1;Jr/~
.,
,.
....
,
Committee; and, further research by the San Diego Sports Training Foundation. This
Addendum addresses the new project design.
'""
;l;
Additionally, it has come to the City of Chula Vista Planning Department's attention that the
site is currently unzoned. The Planning Department's proposal for A-IOO zoning
(Agricultural Use) will be going to the Planning Commission for consideration on July 8,
1992. This zoning permits the development of only I unit per 100 acres of land. This
would maintain consistency with the open space nature of the area.
~
1
I
.....
.~
,
~
1.1.3 Revised Design Project Description
i
Figure A-I illustrates the revised site plan for the Olympic Training Center Boathouse. The
site encompasses a total of 3.7 acres plus 0.07 water surface acres for the dock and ramp.
The modular dock facility will cover approximately 3,000 square feet (0.07 acres of water
surface). Vehicular access is provided by the Boathouse Road from Wueste Road.
Pedestrian access is also facilitated by the pathway from the OTC along the eastern edge of
the boathouse.
,,",
;
G
-
;:i
..
"'"
The redesigned boathouse is a 13,496 square foot facility which will consist of three
separate buildings (see Figures A-2 and A-3). The entrance walkway, separating the
canoe/kayak storage, will incorporate the trellis design found on the majority of the
buildings at the Olympic Training Center. The Boathouse buildings will be natural
redwood and the curved wall seen from the lake-side view will be stucco. The majority of
the roof lines are flat and 14 feet in height (the minimum height requirement for boat
storage). A copper, pyramidal roof will provide architectural relief and relate the
Boathouse to the design elements at the adjacent OTe. The peak of the copper roof will
reach 25 feet 6 inches.
I!<
"\
%
-
"\
,;i
:Ii;
....
1.1.4 Summary Comparison of Impacts
j:
.,
The refinements to the project design resulted in increasing the overall site acreage by
0.6 acre (3.1 to 3.7 acres). The boathouse facility was reduced by 703 square feet
(14,199 to 13,496 square feet). As compared to the previous building height of 29 feet,
the new design of the facility will vary in height from 14 feet to 25 feet 6 inches. This is an
average overall reduction in building height of approximately 17 percent. Table A-I
i\
Jl
.....
.~
...
"""
.4
010571000
1-2
1
.
Jill-I 7
1
I
I
a
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
J
~
== P"'4
~ ~ I
" -<
-
...
~ ~
:! ~
~ ~ ~
! . ~
::i ~
I I '
;1 ~UI.l1
~ ~ I ~~ ~ ,
~
~
/-~~-~
~!:, '~,
' ',~.
i /-1------________ '~
/ </ /' "~
;/ ,/ """ .
h _:! "-__",
/1 i,
. r i "
/' : :
I ,
, I
n
~.
"
-
i
i
I ! ,
,
i ,
, ,
. ,
, ,
" " , ,
"
" .1- \J
"!l" " ~! -
li '" I! II
C2J,sl!1J " "!l
I
"
~
~
a
z
<.
~"
"-t
~;;
"'~
/
,-
I
'" " "
,
,
I "
" "
" "
I
!. -
, '"
! r -
,
, ~
,
,
- .
"
"
", " , , .
", , ,
" "
",
",
'"
",
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
..
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
I
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
~..j , ,
01.... I, l:i
-.......Ji'~ "IJ
", ....... ',.---
'"" 0""-",,,
' .,
'.
'"
~"'......... ...
1-3
)1/ IJ -/ If
<::
l'Il
0:
CIl
-
en
~
';;
CIl
a:
o
J!!
~
'0
g
o
<(
..
Ii;
'g
(/)
oj"
'"
u
~
f-
LU
o
a:
::J
o
(/)
::z: ·
LI.I .
c::a .
=.
c::::I .
i
~
:>
~
~
1-4
i
a
~
'i
,
}'1419
~~
~~
--'
w
I;;
~
...
,
r.l
: ~
. I
: <
-
. j
Ji
..,
!
r..
,
l
....
!
.
...
.~
l
~
u
'"
II.
..
..
5
.c
OJ
o
m
-
o
..
c
o
:;:
'"
>
..
w
Ui
..
==
'0
C
'"
.c
:;
o
en
....
~
.,
~
"\
I
""
I
;i
"T
I
,
.,
.:#
"\
j
'"
.~
w
Jll
~
.u
g
w
<
..
~
'6
,)lJ
..,
i
,
il
"'"
i
l
...,
~
~
u
~ --
w -.
C) LI.I ·
g; c:a .
~ =.
CD.
.
""
'}
,
...
I
1
I r I
"'
Cl: ('I)
~
I I
C -<
-
t ~
I 'i
a
I
>0-
t ==
.~
II.
3l
I :;)
0
=
OJ
0
m
I -
0
III
c::
0
;:
III
I ~
ill
=
1::
0
I z
'tl
c::
i III
-
III
I III
W
I I~
!;( f
:;
I > ~~
~
~ w ~
~ S!
rn
I .<l
2 0
~
~
..
'"
~
I '0
rn
(J)
.:
.!1
u
I ,= z-
w LLI-
"
rr Q-
::>
1-5 0 c::I _
Jtf /J-- d-, 0 (J)
a-
...
-
1
Table A-I I
COMPARISON OF PROPOSED SITE PLAN (EIR -90-12) AND ..
REDESIGNED SITE PLAN (MAY 1992) \
"'l
,
Site Plan Site Plan ~
Component (EIR-90-12) (Addendum) '"
,
Site Acreage (ac) 3.1 3.7 ""I
I
Boathouse (sf) ..
\
,
. Boat/Canoe/Kayak Storage 5,509 5,600 '.~
. Repair Shop 1,983 2,000 ....
. Equipment & Storage 2,534 2,485 I
. Lockers & Showers 2,417 2,646
. Offices 560 450 '"
. Mechanical Room 304 315
. Corridor/Circulation 892 0 ...
j
Subtotal 14,199 13,496
...
'1
Dock (sf) - 3000* - 3000* ,!
,
Parking Lot (sf) 13,312 8,512 ..,
3
.
Deck (sf) 26,621 18,185 "\
'/.
Observation Area (sf) 19,152 27,664 ""l
.~
* Water Surface Area ....
ac = Acres
sf = square feet .
Source: Tucker-Sadler, 1992 ""
'}
""I
,.&
"'!
010571000 1.6 ~
J'1 f1:J/
,
,
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
:1
I
I
,
I
I
I
compares the differences between the project design analyzed in EIR 90-12 and the
redesigned project addressed in this addendum.
The environmental issues potentially impacted by implementation of this redesign include
aesthetics/visual resources and biological resources. These issues are discussed in further
detail below. The other environmental topics analyzed in EIR 90-12 including Recreational
Use Compatibility, Geology and Soils, Hydrology and Water Quality, Cultural Resources
and Traffic/Circulation will not change as a result of the project redesign.
1.2 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
1.2.1 Aesthetics/Visual Resources
As compared to the previous design of 29 feet in height addressed in EIR 90-12, the new
building design would generally result in less significant impacts, due to the lower building
height of 14 feet, the staggering of the buildings and blending with surrounding natural
topographic and vegetative characteristics. However, the new design's copper roof (25'-6"
height) would result in similar but reduced visual impacts as the previous design of 29 feet.
The project's visual impacts from public viewsheds (from Lower Otay Reservoir; from
Otay Lakes Road; from Wueste Road) will be reduced from those of the original proposed
design.
Views from Otav Lakes RoadJEastern Lakeshore
Potential impacts from these distant locations would be less than significant, as with the
previous design of the project. The overall visual effect may be less noticeable with the
new design and lower height.
Views from Lower OtllY Reservoir
Visual impacts from the lake to the site would be less significant with the lower building
height and new design, as compared to the previous 29-foot height. The project will,
nevertheless, result in significant impacts to views from the lake towards the site area.
010571000
1-7
)i/l~
..
...
j
Views from Wueste Road
,.
,."
The new building design and 14-foot height will considerably reduce the visual impacts
from Wueste Road to the site and lake. The newly proposed 25'-6" copper roof
component would result in similar impacts as the proposed project analyzed in EIR 90-12.
...
,
Similarly, the project, as with the previous design, would slightly contribute to the
cumulative visual impacts from ongoing development in eastern Chula Vista and the project
area.
-r
.
~
The significant visual impact findings ofEIR 90-12 would be applicable to the new design
of the project and two of the three measures identified in Section 3.2 of the Draft SEIR will
be required. These measures are as follows:
....
..
...
. Final Landscape Plans for the project, including revegetation areas, shall
incorporate species of a type and size (especially height) acceptable to the City
of Chula Vista Landscape Architect and City Planning Department. Further, the
City shall provide the City of San Diego the opportunity to review and comment
on the plans prior to final approval by the City of Chula Vista. This review and
input is intended to facilitate the blending of the project's landscaping with
nearby City of San Diego recreational areas.
..,
1j.
""t
,
.,
1
. The USOC, or other entity acceptable to the City, shall be responsible for the
monitoring of health and growth of the site's landscaped areas and revegetation
areas for a period acceptable to the project biologist (refer to Section 3.6,
Biology). This monitoring is required to ensure the survival of native species
and revegetation areas. The monitoring shall be incorporated into the overall
mitigation monitoring program for the project.
..
9
~
..,
,;#>
"
~
1.2.2 Biological Resources
'.,
~
The redesign of the site plan will increase the overall acreage from 3.1 acres to 3.7 acres.
This increase in acreage will impact an additional 0.6 acre of low quality Diegan coastal
sage scrub. The disturbed coastal sage scrub appears to have been graded in the past and is
considered to be of low quality due to low structural and species diversity. The additional
areas of impact are shown on Figure A-4.
....
....
010571000
1-8
JLj 19 ~3
....
i
~
f
,I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
,
I
,
I
1
I
r.l
~
s =: ~
'g ;J
~" <
~
...J
<(
z<:)
Qz
f--
_0
0<(
OCC
<(<:)
<:)0
zw
-f-
Ow
<(...J
ccw
<:)0
~ ...
~
'g ~
(f)
-
"
'"
Co
.5
'0
"'
'"
l!!
<(
3:
Ql
Z
Z.
LI.I ·
c:::Il .
=.
c:I.
..
.
...
(~
The boathouse and associated grading and planting do not impact the five existing breeding
California gnatcatcher territories. Gnatcatchers may use portions of the disturbed coastal
sage scrub in the project area for non-breeding season foraging. The relatively high density
of gnatcatchers in the area and the fact that no gnatcatchers are currently utilizing this area
for breeding purposes indicates that the habitat is of marginal quality. Therefore, direct
impacts to California gnatcatchers are not considered significant. Potential impacts to other
sensitive species detected onsite are not considered significant.
'"
..
.~
j
~
!
.
...
As discussed in EIR 90-12, the impacts to Diegan coastal sage scrub are considered
significant and require mitigation. A 1;1 ratio for impacts to disturbed coastal sage scrub
has been identified. Therefore, 0.6 acres of additional coastal sage scrub will be planted
on the two southern most slopes on the west side of the Olympic Training Center adjacent
to the Salt Creek dedicated open space. The additional impact to coastal sage scrub will be
mitigated to below a level of significance by additional offsite mitigation of coastal sage
scrub.
..
,~
j
...
"~
'"
\
.,
..j
.,
.
"'lI
J
'"
,
..,
1
1
,
J
...
J
010571000
1-10
)1j1}')5
...
~
..
,
,
I
I
I
I
,
,
I
I
1
I
I
I
,
,
I
,
I
1
I
SECOND ADDENDUM TO THE
DRAFT SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT
(EIR-90-12) FOR THE OLYMPIC TRAINING CENTER BOATHOUSE
SCH #90010709
Prepared For:
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Prepared By:
The City of Chula Vista Planning Department
June 1992
Ji f/ /'d-~
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I.
INTRODUCTION
A.
PuRPOSE AND SCOPE
This Addendum to Supplemental EIR-90-12 is prepared in accordance with the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines Section 15164. The
purpose of an addendum to an EIR is to comply with CEQA in instances in which
the EIR requires "minor technical changes or additions that do not raise important
new issues about the project's significant effects on the environment", and where
no factors are present that would require the preparation of either a subsequent or
supplemental EIR (Section 15164 a). "An addendum need not be circulated for
public review but can be included in or attached to the Final EIR" (Section 15164
b). "The decision-making body shall consider the addendum with the Final EIR
prior to making a decision on the project." (Section 15164 c).
This Second Addendum to Supplemental EIR-90-12 satisfies Section 15128 of the
CEQA Guidelines stating "an EIR shall contain a statement briefl-y indicating the
reasons that various possible significant effects of a project were determined not to
be significant and were therefore not discussed in detail in the EIR".
B.
BACKGROUND
A Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (EIR-90-12) for the Olympic
Training Center Boathouse was completed in November 1991. As a result of new,
additional information which has become available since that time, including a plan
for the dock of the proposed facility and additional input from the City of San Diego
Otay Lakes Committee, minor, technical changes to the EIR have occurred
including further analysis and mitigation of recreational compatibility issues a
lowering of the building height from 27 ft. to an average height of 14 ft. A
recirculated draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) for the
Olympic Training Center was issued in April 1992. Subsequent to that time, in
May 1992, as a result of the input received by the City of San Diego Otay Lakes
Committee and further research by the San Diego Sports Training Foundation, a
new plan to downscale the building was submitted. A previous addendum was
circulated which addressed the new project design.
1-1
It//) rcJ?
...
,
C. PROJECf SETTING
..
.
.
+,
""'l
The subject site is located immediately west of the Lower Otay Reservoir, east of
Wueste Road., and north of the City of San Diego local boat launching facility.
~~,
..
!
I
The site encompasses a total of 3.7 acres plus 0.07 water surface acres for the dock
and ramp. The modular dock facility will cover approximately 3,000 square feet
(0.07 acres of water surface). Vehicular access is provided by Boathouse Road
from Wueste Road. Pedestrian access is also facilitated by the pathway from the
Olympic Training Center along the eastern edge of the boathouse.
'""!
i
.j
...
~
D.
PROJECf DESCRIPTION
'1'
The proposed project is a 13,496 square foot building which will provide a training
facility for American rowers and paddlers (canoes and kayakers) preparing for
international competition. The Boathouse plans incorporate program requirements
for shells, canoe and kayak storage, team offices,IQCkers, showers, toilets and a
storage area.
...
.
....
~
....
'/
~
'.l<'
II. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
Information is provided as follows which substantiates the reasons specific issues
were found not to be significant and therefore were not discussed in detail in EIR-
90-12.
,
,
...
.
..
Land Use Consistencv
""!
t
In concept, the Boathouse was considered in EIR-89-ll for the Olympic Training
Center (pages 4-12 through 4-15) and in Section 5.5 of the General Plan Update
EIR-88-2. The proposed land uses for the Olympic Training Center have been
adopted as part of the City of Chula Vista General Plan Update (July 11, 1989).
...
,S
"'II
),
j;
The Addendum to the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (EIR-90-
12) for the Olympic Training Center Boathouse also discusses land use consistency
on pg 1-2.
....,
I't\if:
$
'""!
,
;;.
1-2
) L/ /1-;).. g/
f
-
.~
j'
..,
i
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
,
I
I
I
1
I
At the time of annexation of this land from the County to the City of Chula Vista,
the Local Agency Formation Commission was satisfied with the City of Chula
Vista's intent to maintain consistency with the open space nature of the area. The
Planning Department's proposal for A-100 zoning (agricultural use) is scheduled
for the Planning Commission's consideration on July 8, 1992. This zoning would
permit the development of only I unit per 100 acres of land and would therefore be
consistent, as previously stated, with the open space nature of the area and would
not be a significant impact.
Public Services and Utilities
EIR-89-11 addressed all public services and utilities for the Olympic Training
Center. There are no additional public service and utility needs.
~
Noise is generally defined as "unwanted sound". The City of Chula Vista General
Plan EIR establishes that exterior noise is considered significant when it is above 65
db CNEL.
Additionally, the project will generate 152 vehicle trips per day. This additional
traffic on Wueste Road will not significantly impact existing traffic noise.
A threshold standard adopted by another city was determined that 82 motorized
boats with engines at 3,000 rpm 50 feet from the noise receptor would be
considered significant (City of San Diego Thresholds of Significance Workshop
June 19, 1992).
As the maximum number of motorboats that will be used by the Olympic Training
Center staff is 4, this would be below the level of significance.
Air Ouality
EIR-89-11 addressed potential air qllality impacts and found that the OTC project as
a whole did not represent an impact to air quality on a project specific level but did
1.3
li/J~.21
""
.
""
have a significant impact cumulatively. Overriding considerations for the same
were adopted. One standard measure of significance for air quality is the following:
,.,
...
~ected Vehicle Trips
-
'I
::i
,
Any project which generates more than 2,000 vehicle trips per day. As this project
will operate 152 vehicle trips per day, this would be insignificant. Another
safeguard is that there are only 38 parking spaces, and plans for shuttling from the
main OTC facility impacts this project basis to a level below significance.
-
';0;
'"'II
Socioeconomic and Fiscal Factors
..
:t
EIR-89-11 which reviewed the possible environmental impacts of the Olympic
Training Center found that no significant negative socioeconomic or fiscal impacts
would result from project implementation. The Olympic Training Center project
will house approximately 5,422 people in its residences and will provide
employment opportunities. Overall, the project was found to have a positive fiscal
impact on the City.
....
...
>,
;
""
Mineral Resources
...
I,
The EIR completed for the General Plan in May, 1989 mapped all of the areas in
which there are significant mineral resources. The proposed project site is not
within the boundaries of those areas. Therefore the impact to mineral resources is
insignificant.
...
,
,
.
....
Growth Inducin~ Impacts
"'"
The growth inducing impact of the proposed project is considered insignificant
because of the fact that the number of users of the facility will not be permanent
residents of the community but will only be residing in the City of Chula Vista
during their training. Approximately half of the athletes using the facility will live at
the Olympic Training Center and the other half will reside elsewhere.
1
...,
~
;~
-
"
"'
1-4
},--/;q~Jt)
.,
J
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
i
t
t
I
Relationship between Local Short-Term Use of the Environment and the
Maintenance and Enhancement of Lon~- Term Productivitv
This was addressed by EIR-89-11. The local short-term use of this facility as a
Boathouse with the adoption of the mitigation as proposed will not have any
significant short-term impacts on the environment except for the visual impact.
The project is in keeping with the maintenance and enhancement of long term
productivity as the Olympic Training Center plans are considered appropriate long
term uses in keeping with the City's goals to balance the increase in public and
private recreational opportunities with increases in the economy and the protection
of environmentally sensitive resources.
Cumulative Imnact Summary
These impacts have been addressed in EIR-89-11 and in EIR-90-12. All
cumulative impacts have been mitigated to below a level of significance except
visual impact.
Silffiificant Irreversible Environmental Chan~es
These were addressed in EIR-89-11.
1-5
I'I/l-J(
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
,
I
I
I
t
I
SECTION 2
COMMENTS AND RESPONSES TO COMMENTS ON DRAFT SEIR
(JANUARY 1992)
AND RECIRCULATED DRAFT SEIR (APRIL 1992)
) '-/4 ~J~
J
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
Introduction
The Olympic Training Center Boathouse Supplemental EIR (SEIR) was originally
circulated in January 1992. As a result of additional input received during the 45-day
public review period from the applicant concerning their most recent plans which included a
dock, and various concerns raised by commentators, particularly the City of San Diego
Lakes Committee, the SEIR was recirculated. The Recirculated Draft SEIR was circulated
for public review from April 28, 1992 to June 11, 1992. Final review through the State
Clearing House ended on June 17, 1992 after the City of Chula Vista Planning
Commission closed the public hearing on the proposed project. All of the comments
received on the January 1992 Draft SEIR in addition to the comments received on this
recirculated Draft SEIR are included in this section.
The State Clearing House did not receive any comment letters from state agencies that
received the Draft EIR dated January 1992. A total of7 comment letters were received by
the City of Chula Vista during the review period for the first Draft SEIR. The comments
are responded to on the following pages and in the recirculated Draft SEIR (April 1992).
Comment letters are in the following ordl:r:
. City of San Diego Planning Department
. City of Chula Vista Engineering Department
. Sweetwater Union High School District
. Citizens Coordinate for Century 3
. San Diego Council of Bass Clubs
. Peterson & Price
. George Hanson
The State Clearing House did not receive any comment letters from state agencies that
received the Recirculated Draft SEIR. A total of 4 comment letters were received by the
City of Chula Vista during the review period. These comments are responded to on the
following pages. Comment letters are in the following order:
. San Diego National Sports Training Foundation
. San Diego Council of Bass Clubs
. Kevin Mineo (representing San Diego Council of Bass Clubs)
. George Hanson
2-1
jL/1-J;J
..,
.
...
Additionally, comments and responses thereto of the minutes from the Planning
Commission held on June 17, 1992 are included following the comment letters and
responses on the Recirculated Draft EIR.
~
'i'
...
j
1
Comments and responses thereto for both the first Draft SEIR and the Recirculated Draft
SEIR, the Draft SEIR and the Addendum to EIR 90-12 which analyzes the final design
proposal (submitted by the San Diego Sports Training Foundation on May 29, 1992)
comprise the Final SEIR for the Olympic Training Center Boathouse.
.,
~
""!
4
..,
}
i
....
.$
'"
;
I
..,
J
~
""
\
...,
, <ioI
'"
Ji
,
..,
...
,il
""'I
".,
-
2-2 / if 11 ~ J i
'-'
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I '"
OJ
'"
, ,.
'"
.,
'"
Q
~
u
I '"
:::
u
z
'"
'"
'" N
I u ~
'" s:
,. >-
'" '"
'"
s:: .,
"
Z z
I 0 .,
::l
'"
'"
'"
~
I ...
,.
Z
'"
:;:
:;:
1 0
u
I
!~
o
00
~
~
w
t;;
~
"
:I:
o
0:
~
Ul
W
0:
Cl
Z
..
"
z
Z
z
S
Q.
u..
o
w
o
It ~
Oli:i~
~~<S
0:... .
ocnf=!
~~r5
w m:i
>I-~
o 8u
C'1 '!~
<
.
"
~
o
<
u
~
w
"
~
&
~
(jj
&
..;
"
o
c
E
~
8
'-,
'"
~
~
~
"
ii'!
c
"..
.:;...-
'"
'"
'"
...
;;
'"
....
>,,;j
~i~"
" >..
'" ..'"
....
~~5>
~E~~
alUrt5
'"
o
"
.
'"
.
...
..
on
'"
..
'"
i
..
Cl
ffi
u
"
'"
....'"
"'0
.......
~~
o
u'"
i'"
..iJ
0'"
..
u
.
'n
.Q
"
'"
o
....
"
'"
.
.
. ...
....... >
. .
~'8Io4'"
QI.,.j. Q)
Ii!l-I-iJIllQJ
5 z.t: sfi
" .....<:
....:. 0'10
>GllQc....
e::...............
QI>.c,......
GfollOC
'0'"' Gl<<l
. ...."
BCD .U III
1OJ::1O l-I
CioI.j.I4I::l
C.. ..
. ..
~:t ~~ to
.Q QI 0 +J
10-.-4 U QJ C
> .<:.
lIIlUlII:aJ!!
li"> u
,..~fio
"00 ..-4"0
CU.....UlI): .
.... I) .-qJ
.... 1/l',.,j'O llf U
..... Ql U (1)....<
!'S~::: ~ >.
~5ii~~
0'1 0 0......
GlIllQlUl-I1lI
III .... .,.j::J
::llUftllU>Ol
O<l-l....>c
.clll III III m....
01.... .c rO
C III III .&oJ....
.~'Ofi g~ 5
~tl~ >.~ ~
.....uo+' 0
UCII 10"''''
Qla;~fi~~
~lQglAllJQ
..., 0 Ql4J
rn....'tl 0'11: lIS
c'O cu....
llI....IlIGlIiilC
.c = .... Ql,..
follll't'!):,..O
~~g'~~
U 0 :.llJ'....
O....UQlllJ
't:IUIllI-lU
~
"
.
.
e
~
..
...
'"
...
'"
I
..
.<:
c",
....
~.
. .
'<:>0
lU ...........
>. ..
llSUlQlDo
.QQlIIHi
U"O
"0 "
O$.lQlDo
>0...
.'"
\.1):411:
.....18.-10
.......
~> .
f"l Ql ~ Ql
lDloll-l""'''
o .
1.-14.1>.
U"l<<l....lll
"'.a.JIUB
.co
. .
iQ ~~:J
f"lo.c+J
0\,......11I
....~c:B
..c...
.. 0
..
...
E:Bg~
... .<:~
0"''''
..cc
......ri C
0'" "
o 10410 lU
E-iI'llQllll
"'.... "
.-tQlOO
...." .<:
. .'"
u ~:5.~
.0 "
Ul..-tO'l<<l
"'....ccu
Qllll".-l.-l
.-lQl+JU
tIo+ g.g Ql
....
>oc.
co..
.u'"
J
~1
!~
.
U
C
.
..
.
...
.
.
..
..
...
~
.
....
o
. .
~~
...
cu
" .
"'"
...
.e
u
>0
"'..
.- "
>..
. .
ee
.--
JLj/l-3~
,"
,
,I
'i
,.
'!
I
"
~
10l
..
';:
'"
~
i:i
c
'"
..
II
>:
;l;
..:
'"
'"
~
'"
0"
it
CJ~
UJ'"
s
-'"
>:
O~
..
~
l'iZ~
~<~
.. r.n"
11: ..
f,i (J
~ ,.
e
o
~
iii ""'
/;J::
Q:'f:!
'"
"0 "
~ <'IJ 0
~ N il
~ ~ N .5
~ .;:;: ~ 9
'" ;> bl) ~
.~ .;: li: ~
.t:: ;:; "0 u
9 ..c a -5
~ ~ ~ .E
"5 -d' N <is
'" 0 .::1
~ ..c :! c
~ ~ N S
~ bl) ~ c.
:a ,s N ~
'" 0
Iii .c
'" ~
] <i
o 'C
M ~
"3 .
H
" ~
'" 0
" ~
'" "
ii .s
o -"
" g
jj
8 c@
'"
~
2)
<.0
~
~
~
a
c
"
c
!l
.. 0-
oi5 ~~
Z2 E ~
z:C Q.cC ~
z-c .22~ ~
j~ ~>~ J-
..0 ~~Ci R
~ ~
" "
Q, ~
9 :a
~ 0::
" Iii
"''''
'" 'i!
~ Q
.9: "0
E 9 c
~ .i .~
~ ~ ~
:2 ~ ~
~ t-o .5
.s ]
E~~
"
~
~
"
..
C
~
.
'"
.
"
..
"
~
"
"
.
....
..
.
..
..
~~
>liii
.>
'Grot... ...
~" ..
&afi~
....~==
"00
. ....
,Q'" ...
lot"'~:lI
0...-4"'.&::
jQUf'II(J
o
....
o
'"
..
. "0
'B c e
c .~ .s :9 =S
~ u ; 8 e;
~'o~~~~~
a u .g .!::l Cl
N <is -i3 0 11
..t a S ~ .;
~ E & ~ .~
<'IJ C. U U U
c. e ;s ;s u
o!: 0 oS ':
~ :; .;r: ~ oS
.:a g ;a .a ~
Q ~ u ,.g ~
"0 0 ~ ~
~ 6 ~ ~
"3 'g 00 N
.~u- 1= c ..t
c .~
~ ] ~
oS ~ tri
~ e ::i
",.s '0
.~ .s ~
E .$ .3
~ c 5
3..9: ~
;; Q,
'" " e
6 E <'IJ
'0 ::s -s
~ .g '3
..,
..
:g
~
..
ei
...
~
u
"..
"H
.....,
""
....
all
..
~~.
~~
. tJ'G.."'"
. Ct: 8..c: u
.c-..4fo1~""'.
~ u '"
.. 0 .....
Crot~ A-..4.
1-0 u-S",o'll
...,.... . ",.
... 'O~~ .
.."'U .
i'~.s.gJ~:
Q ~.~.g"3
r:~fi::..
~,-::",...;II5J11
;"0. a!:: ~
rot.::5. "'::1
Do" U;);OO
...O.....c:
.!~:t:.c= .
~ ~ .......'9-;; >.
g'" ~... '"
'W ". .-;:...-4
o ",11 ...c";
a~g~'8~g.
~'CJ .~~ &0-1
~33u=.~
a!I c-a.. u-.c:-
....Qc.......t
-=~,..~.... >
.'W 0.... "",
>.. "'.A 0 C C
-;:... ::;::ti~.
c..
.5.J~.~S
~",. ..."'....
rot.a "'.-4....
:I..;'l:I~ ~
C .004....c: *
..... ::I..... tJIo
1!~;::.8~ :
o ..
.... ..
~1:~....:.s
a ~ ~ i-=~-t:
.::ftu.:cll
.c=.oo.......c
E-4J.tu-ao..
"
c
'2
ij .
-" :J,
~ a
- "
8. 0
",il
-9 ~
!3 ~
..a ~
~<
~ ~
. :a
@ .~
~ ]
'"
-
"
oS 0(
~ '" CI
,":s "'
"oS 8
.5 ;s 15
~ ~o
'l:l ..f! e
a .5 ~
~ 0 C
4J .~ 0
~ ~ ~
. " .c
~;5 ~
-a - ~
!3 ~ Ii
.s e <.l::
~:g'E
" - .
~ ~ .~
~ ~ :a
'0 ~ -g
e . "
~ ~ ~
'" .g .!j
!l 3 ..
o .E 15
~ ::: ~
bI:l * ~
.s ~
.~ ~ .~
" ~ s"
u '8 "
'a .0 <;j
'"
:g ~ ~
. ..,
8 .c
:; ~
~ 8
'2 oS
.gf :!;
'0 ::
~ ~
.!! il
" .
. .
o '"
"ij Cii
~ "
sa 0(
~ ~
P'
o d
u C
-d~u~~
~ ;;: 4J e
Iii a .g .~
~ ~ e UJ
~ :a 9 M
15 'S .~ 6
] C .;]
'" ~ .~ .$
.5 :5 'l:l 'l:l
"ij :.c a ~
'l:l .~ 'E ~
.:; 0 0 1i
o "0 c :.a
-.
.g
.s ";;
~ .~
'2
:a .9
~ E
- ~
5 ~
E "0
E :;
o "
u c
Jl '2
~ I~
"
"
~ "
S]
U..C>.tilllO<&oJ
~""~o-e::l~r""
s'" trl..........
>.....oc. rCe.
.-4 g <&.I.. J:.... J:
OJ..1bO-S ~fill~
..c.~.-4ureo
1O...s..,..:0 >
. .."..,..., C.~...
tl",... O....A o.
o>to.a :tJ>._
.c.u"'<&oJ"CI'tII"'.
-"'.&.I 0.... ..-4............
0.;11 gou.
R -'" ...., > ...,
...o......c..fi...
....alM;::~p; >. ...
c. .....H~...O
o. ..... IIW....
~1I~4'bQ=~:
.u...: ..::.."
.... ~ '9J:: ....
c........G;...~>.-4
;:~.a ,;:::I~~
u>'''"'5-=.i~~
0... t.Pu.'5 G.-4""
"'G~ :. ...>.:
. a.,;:.a.a ~....t.:: k
-a).-..4 ~... .~.... U
::1.,4 V..:: Cl
....." "'1)"'~ lot~ k
g..a.a....,....cu
....:G"'>..~k'"
'l:IM~..:I"'IIV~
...."":s.c ..kO
g II 0'.... k >......., lot
.c..c:OiW::I.';'::A.
..&.I'io~'tII .0
.uc. :. tit.....;
ttO"C:!:!::t..s..
c ~ ... 0 ~o 4J!;.5 S 3.
.-0"" "'.....
s:'" .. s..~.
... ......::....CA
o-a.&:: .... s.. 0-1<>
...........lo.cu
1!~.!::.. t~ :",.!i
81&g~:.~;.
.o.c:a.....c.o.
tOUlo4pO"'".aU,c
...
.
-
...,
,
..,
!
~
.,
.
.,
l
..
,
$
...
,~
-
...
ir
.
..,..
...
sf
.
'"
..x
Ii..
Hi
u,>
""
i
""l!
,
'".
."t:
c.
0..
c
~.
. u
... .
>.
o.
".
...
.'"
..
:;!
~o
,,'"
,,"
...
~ .
oil-
'"
"'.
0>
.
.",
.c.
"0
.....
0..
"H
...
,
..
..
to
.
~
,Q
.
..
..
u
.
~
,Q
.
..
;,;
II
,Q
..
.
..
..
.
.
"
-)
...
/<1
...
lOll!!
~
o . .
......
"....
...
~~"i
.u..
..,0..
....,,'"
.
.....
.~
.
.
..,
/L/f)~Jh
..,
4
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
~: \
I
~ .
!~l
~..
.~
.. 0,,"
i ~~!
u ~"
" ~.
... ....
..
~
I
..
~
.
~
Q
o.
..
......
0"
.....
~
.....
...
.."
.s~
...
,\\~
,.
~t'
~...
"u
...
.. -
l!~
...
.....
~!
u
u
J~A~J7
..,
,
..Ii
"'"
'0 ~ "'I
a 0
'1i .
cs 11 .,g
'0 "[ U
" u
0 oS
"3 :g "' "'"
~ 0
'u ~ ~ \
u 0 E
'" Ii j
0 0. '0
oS . ~
'a 0 e
'0 g; ~ """
0 U
N ~ 0 U
'" 8' .8 '; 111
e
11 is. . g
0 0 0
;!: 0 8 ...
'" ~ "'
0 ,
. :;; u
!l, . . ij 4
C
i!. u .~ .a
>
9 u oS
Jl ;; 8- .~ "'"
e .~ ~ g,
0
~ . ;; ." 'it-
0 " 'u 0
a'! oS ~ 0
. 0
" '" ...
-d il 0 '0
" !l a
0
0 "' l'l
0 .
c :;; l;;
~ .
'" 31 0
Gl 0 "3 -
<3 ~ "'
'" u
..
-!
0 ,
w '" '" uu,., ." ."", ....
:> ,e. 0> Vl.,.,j..... O'l.,.jlUeJ: "0
i.;!J0'l O"'~ ~~~~.~ 0
iij z~ 0'" . .~
_ m ""'ll ..... 01..... Ql 0 > . ..,
u z -on "" 0.0- '" . >
z 00 '" " ~'"
-..(, :fi..-ilUlUOI ~.
!J.J W ~ M' o 0 ,~
... "''''''' ..-4 lIS........." 4:
t: ... ~~. ~ )....:l U Gl ..
QI....'tJ u.c: Ql C U'
, ",.. . tJ 0. .
o. "'ll" "tl Co . a 0..
O~ .. ~ Cll~ -e .0 ""\
,~ ~~& "~
.,.. .~ <<l >o~.... o.
, . ...'"
~ . .u" u ,,0
. o ...,-4 "" III . 0
0 .~;;:: Ql meu~~ ."
0
'" ).'.-1"" <<l IlS Ql 0 :::J "
0 " ~o. CIl J:: u.Q o. ...
" ~ . .'" 0"''' -"
" '" 0 o~ . o u. . u
" . 0 '" .-. "".....I'l;;:::.... ..
0 ... ulG~ "0.
Cl 0 " +I lU 0....+1 c.~
. U . ;;:::J::= III 1-1 ""G+I
" ~ .. " ~~'I-I"",g 0
..
.. ... 0 ...~ . Cal,f.J+JlII "u "'"
0( ... . ~+Ia 011)1:..-1 ...
. , tJ U ~~.l'lI ~ "'...
'" " " ,,~ 0 ~...
. .. '" 00 u .....~, ". .
0 .. 0 Ql en.... .. "
u ,., .. ....al.....QI'O
",." ~ ~ ~Ii'~ ""
" 0 " 0 ,,"a
. ~ .. '" .~
... . tJ . .a-g'j . , "'"
0( " I-IQl 1IltJ'l > ,
" .. ~ c.~ .f.Jol:"tlC ]~
.,; g- u ''ll .....5+1~~ '0
.. . ~ ,,~o . u" . .
. '" 0. 'j~~.~~ ","
'" 0 ~ cSe ,,0
. ~:Je o. 0.
, - ~ 41.c-g~.-i . ... i:" "'Ii
" 0 0 ." 0 .g l-I:;:lllllll 0,.,
, '" al.oi.... 00 ...
'" '" " . c.1Il.,..,j o..-j 1-1 0' "
" ~ H "'" " .g &0 g 21 jl
, . ... .,. .. . ...
'" '" on QlQlQlIlla.C ".u on
cJ:::fi iii +I="l-IclllQl , U 0 '"
......... .~ ldQl 0 U ,,0, ~ .. ....
tr> Q)."",.. 0'" u (j
.. " -" '.-!r-i..Q+lQlO'l ~~;;::: :;-
tJ QJ U +I.... ..... lG l'll 0'1: '" jt/,4 ~)7
... 1-1 IV u;'- 'a.ti~.~~~ . .. " ...- .
" .., lG.......Id.... ~~o "
0 '" 0"''' W::l+lO'lI-l "'~ '" Cl .,
0 '" " Ql "" a u o c. 0 ."".... lIS s....."j >J ?S
" .. '" 3 Q.,.... lIS E-tlll:J::E:IIla, H'.
...,
..
j.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
u
E
OJ
Q
'0
o
..<::
u
U)
-g,
:c
lO:
o
.2
::J
....
I])
-
<0
~
ill
I])
~
U)
~
.
. ,
w -
" -
ffi~;;2
o. ~
zt.!...
O<E':'
i==.2:
~ii:~_
~oU'"
~~!!1i
:i-s
o .
c( ]
o
]
o
c
i
o
U
.,;
& "O~CSQl~Ql~~ ~
~ '.'. '" il "d -5..c::di <II]
iii :::? 8.ilS ~!:lfc..J ~
U ~ em5~]:s>.~ e
W :'-~' '" "'ii: 8. w._ illl ]
" ~ ..!i_iS ~
D: ..... is! -5..~ -"13
H. t'~ S;a j oS
1lliij8,. ~~ _~c.i
l'"
00 eO.;t!~ ~
g. tlll'tl =-::; Ql >
e.p :ll"U ...
...;
s. ;3'a.s ~.~ ~ ~i
.e-ot:.q .a] g
ll~ ~:iH~ ~'"
-5,::
]C_ '" '15~
a_..l:I r.a~ u= ,.,~
='0 .b.II''':a ~ .+311 "'''
OjfQ'=<tI 8 a
QlQl "t:lcu.!o
fi.;i@;J<~8.e ~:ll
.;i '"' 'a:=. =- $'8 "
._.eP;a..e-.s~ ~ ...~ i
.. ~"~~ -5 H
... a 3~~~~,-
'" bOt;~ ~.so ii:
.. =.5~;t'ou;= ~~
0 " '" 0
~ ~ :a -; ~0.80.~ .e ~ ~
~ '" ~;'.,
. ,2iQ)Q,lcn ~gOJ~ilS~E
~ .. 'Or.a~g ~ "''''.o~".~ ri ~l
'" ~~ ""~~ .;; . .... evo:So QJ. ~
1) '" ~ cS~~r.ait1E:8 .
~ ~ CS-aQl<:i .; 0 ~- ~ ~~
..: ... S fl-5 ~ Ql ~ tJ Ql "0 C '"
~ .,; ~<3';.l~ g ~ ~
c '" ,; ,., " ~ .a-5~ ~-5 t 8.:2 ~
.
'" i ~.i 0 ~ :ll "l ~~H~lii!~~ _ 0 " 0 w
c .8 .:!
.c l%:l Q ~"'3 ~ .~ ~
~ ~ ~
c ,:;. to..c: ~ t::!:1~fzl.80~ ... .~ OJ
!I ~a~t:i() l::l
..
.. ... /L//J<3j
c '"
0
.;;;
.,
Q
~
~ ~s
'" ~N
~.., '"
'" -
~~..]~
..0
~ ~
a ~~
~ '"
.... 40
o ~J!
.'
p-!jJ,iCl
4
N
'"
'"
~
.,;
~
-
~
-
"
.:
.
.
~
~
-~
0: Ii
68
- .
fi': ~
t~~~
a :0-...3'"
~ <
~.r4 CU t)
"U~
c::: '.-l"
AI 0 III 0
10000>'01:
Iooq; OJ"
lU...~.,.j
....'" '"
..::il c:::
100 <ll-<l'IQ
::I:Vl..,V
~
-
o
~
.
~.
...~8
" 0
..0 .
~~ .
. . "
~~~
~ -
. - .
~.~
o~
III C ~(7l
E II llOCI'
C::U 100....
o .
.:1 ~Jj t;-
o ~ .
r::C::.,,::I
~.....==
. . .
~ - .,
.....~
~ .~
C l"I'" U
G.I "" C...
Ii! Q. III ell
~ ~E-O
Q..... 0 ..
,Cl.O ""N
o ~_
en ell > I
...-5Jjj
~
allooU~
5~~t1
0("
.
"
o
.
-
.2i
.
~
.
.
o
o
.0
~
.
.ll
" ~
~ _ 0
~~ .
. 0 e
~ 0 .
~-~
0..
. .
::~:i!a:
~ '"
III >'fl'l_
~ . .
en........'"
o~.
~ ~"
ell"'.... EI
... cu..... u
.... :J U U
~.3:~
N
.
"
o
.
-
.2i
~
o
.
~
..
-
.
~
o _
c:: CU'f"I
o u 0
~ 0
~ .-
"0.
~~.
_ 0 .
"~~
. .
. - ~
0.....
~
~ "0
u ,_
. ~-
..... E V
o > >
A:: 82
.
.
o
o
"
~
.8
~
.
o
o
~
~
.
z
.
o .
. .
.::.s
Po
o 0
.~
~~
.
~~
o 0
. 0
o
0,"
~
. 0
~o
"'~~
O~
O~.
~ ~.a
....
~ ~
o . .
~~
~_.
~o~
d~:s
u g
0. u ~
~ .s '"
,8 ",!,
u ej u 's 'C
" . ~ ~ " -
- 0 1J
~ 0 " 0
" 0 u " :I: '" <5
.s " u "' u 0
e . '" ~ oS ~ '"
,~ C
1J u 0 '0
~ '0 >. 0 ~ 0
.... 'a " . ,g "0
" " 0 "0 '9 -
u u 0 "0 '8
:s fi c. 0 ~ u ~
~ ~ 8 "0 u q .
8 e' ~ '6 :9 ~
'" ' ~ . ~ S
:! iil c. 8 " .
" '" u !:) :; .8 " .s
~ .s . ;; ~
" " 0 " " ~ 0
u
,8 Cl '~ 8 u "8 a
E .s 'x
. 1l 0 ~ g '3 e E
~ ~ ~ c. 0
," . " c. c.
" "3 "0 ~ '" ~ .e .
c. ,~ 8 -'! 0 u 0 ~
a ~ " "0 e ~ ~ ~
.s
. .g 0 . 0
:s .;1 . "" c. ~ 8
S E "' "0 '"
0 u
C ~ ,g . ~ . ,8
0 d 0 0 ~ c :;;
.
. 0 ~ .8 .., u 0
.. 'C 9 fi ~ " u
~ e M "
u u ll, ," .9 > '" .. ~
c. ~ {!
.s 0 a ~ '0. " ,;
~ - ~ "
& .9 '" . ~ . u
.s e 0 0 - 0 ~ ~
- " I 0 0 ~
u c. ~ '" 0 c u
g - e 0 " .s ~ u
.B 'c '" u "
~ ~ . 0 ~ '" u
s & " '0 0 .s
. . .. '~ 0
u ~ u 11 . ~
0: 0: ? u U "0 ., 0
'" .. '"
o
.
-
-
.
u
.
"
~ .
o
- ~
. 0
..~
~" .
~~-
~ ....
Ii :5 III
8cnt
o 0
.o~
o~~
~~
~.~
O~ .
jl~
~u'"
.
~_O
- ~
O~ .
~o~
o .'"
~.O
O.
_O~
O~
~..
o ..
.~ .
~ " .
:g g~
~ "
~ >
- ."
o .
o ~ .
u O~
1II ~.3
o .
. 0 ~
'::Ulll
~ .05
~. ~
tJc:IooCU
o . _
Gl......;Ji lU
'5~..9::::
o 0
~ -~
o Gl 0 QI
. -
c,g Ii> III
o 0 .
.... :It::
~. 0
U 1::"1:1......
Q.>'.-lCU'"
.. :JIIl<ll
... 00 "C
.,,_1:11:
., 0 .
>. 0 ... 0
c::.....el-L.
-
~o
.0-
~
.0
~ .
.
~ .
.
.~
,,~
~ 0
~
~ .
O~
-
. .
. u
o ~
o
o -
~ .
~ 0
" 0
............
~ . .
~ . u
8'~ i
o
. . u
~s.g
~.
~
. . .
. ~ u
~ 0 0
_ 0 .
. -
u.
..~
. - .
............
u~
~ .
o . 0
u" 0
'_ .0
~ .
~ .
~ . .
~ ."
.~
- .
~.sii
. .
. . >
,,~
. ~.
" "
~~
o .
. . .
. '-
o " U
. ~ 0
~~.
~" ~
.0.
" ~-
"
M ..
I ~'.-l
U ~~
o
. -
.
.~
~ -
~ .
o .
u 0
o
.~
_u
. .
. -
~.
~~
. .
.
.. .
, .
N _
o
. 0
_ u
o
~ .
~"
'"~
...:~=
. 0
0'_
~.~
. - .
~ ..-
~ .
O~
ouo
o
- . -
. .
.d~e
o 0
N ~
~ .
. . 0
" " -
~ O~
~
~ ~
0.'"
. ,
" ON
u.
~ .
~ 0 _
> ~ 0
~
G.I 111..-1
. - '"
_ 0
." .
O.~
" ~
0_
. ~
~ III ~
. ~
:::~ ~
- - .
"'"
~
"'"
;;.,.
~
"'"
1
,
,
.
""'
j
.,
j
""'l
Ii
..
l
I
""'!
,'"
o
OM
0"
~o
~~
~
~o
.u
~
""
o
O~
~ 0
>
o .
- -
0'
K,g
"'~
o
Z m
.
~~
~ .
o .
.~
.
. u
.~
~
00
-~
o .
~ "
o
~ .
-
. .
~
. .
>~
o
" .
."
~
.
.0
~
.,
J
M
.
"
o
.
-
.
~
.
~
4
.
"
o
.
-
.2i
.
~
i!
-
.
.
Q
N
.
_ 0
.-~
o
. ~
000
o u .
~ .
u.~
u u
~o.
-.~
~ -
. . .
.~ .
Wf~
~ ~
0_
~.-
~".
~~~
~o~
. 0
~o
o ~
~ 0
o -.
. -
.~
. 0 0
o . ~
-;~;
o"'~
-
.
. -
o~<
0""
. ..
. ~~
. ~
~
N~
~ 0
o
~~ .
~ . .
O~ .
.-
'" .
e-
--.
> < .
o .
~ ~.
~ ~ oS ~
~ _ 0
tlllll...."
=-=OE
o
" IU 1: U
.l::J::oo
.......::""
tlOl::llI."
I:: 0 IJ II
~ ~"
loo."....1:
,5 ~:: ~
00 .
___(:l..QJ.....
l"1 e"O <1/
--............
..,
,
.
'jj.
..,
i:
"'"
I
.~
..;
...,
.
..,
~
. 0
"
04
.
- .
. ~
'l::!.
~
.
'(;:1
- .
" . .
~~
~ >
~ '"
" -,
.f"II1IM
.o-
x . ~
'"~o
. .
-~
N " e
-. .
""'I
~
..
~
'<>
..
'"
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
u
'"
.~
or
"
,
o
.il
> '9
v M
;;
;;
..
"
o ..;
. O!
O! M
M "
" ~
l\, ,
. 8
0.;;
5 ~
;< M
" "
" ~
Iii 0.
'" 8
'E il
o "
"0 'S:
" 8
. 0.
;; "
~ "
.~ ~
'" 0
~ 8
.5 ~
" l!
M -
~ l!
~ .g
" .
~
" .0
~ ~
8
o
.~ .g
1 ~
l! .E
.... .5
>>"
" 0
~ ~
v .g
;; ~
~ 0
~ ~
~ '0
v "
;; .
S l!
.~ I
Lll
.g 0
'" .!l
.
11 u
o .!j
o 9
E v
n
o '"
U "
0:
2:-
:3 ~
E ~
~
.g ~
" .g
~ "s:
~ 'il
0:: .5
tii ~ 2'
tI) l:: tii
'Eq
0, a =
il" '-'
Eli"
;; "
~ .;
.~ ,g
'" u
v di!
;; v
E ;;
;;
"
~
is
o
8
~
P-
o ;;; '0
g ~ ~
~ u .g
~ sa ~
c: i 9
.<J " ~
B e J.:!
g ;s ,g
Q 'i
~ ]
~ .~
'"
~
"
"
1i
o
o
u
.
"
c
v
e
,
U
c
~
e
"
~
w
o
"
0.
V
"
"
~
o
>>
c
"
c
."
~
c
."
~
,
~
v
~
U
.
" v
~ ;;
~ ;;;
8 -;
." v
'g ~
" ~
8. v
v i'!
.s ,a
~ ~
, '"
~ ~
~ '"
~ ~
8
.0
~
'"
.5
v
u
c
"
U
'"
.5
.~
~
o
~
.
~
..9
v
"
9
"
"
.
.!!'
.E '"
" ,.
.8
Ii ,.
u .
. "
g ~
0. .
E ~
~ ,2
-;; ;;;
c .:.0
.~ .~
" 'S
~ 8
il .0
s go
E -g
:1!E
'"
E
o
"
"
.
;; "
,g ~
~ :s
'" .
v v
F' ;;
11 ~
g ~
- ,
o 0
~ 8
5 ~
8 ]
~
~
'-'
z
~
~
is
'"
z
u
V>
~-
i fl
00
. v
~
>>. .
..-1....uu~
~ Gl "P'I.... ~
t1JQo:.....-4.
lU ~"''I:I
. , c
"CI.c: a 0...
C DI U DO
os,," j.o III
.c: 0 Cll VI
01 ....1.1::1
o. 0
...-l.a 1lI"P'1.c
... .:.:.nu
0.0 III ::I
111....,-1 ...
o
U >. II 0 0
.c.-l.c:........
.j.lQl"'1II
" .~
~:::l~i :::
~ 00
j.o 0 II .-l
::IlII III Ill....
-o....:::II::Ild
" 0"
. ~ ~
... III tIS too III
;:I.... "'CI u.a
" c.
U lU III ....
o 1llI..-t >. 1Il
a . ... :l
01 III U U S
co>
~ " .
.-I U 0 III III
o ~ "
-C....lUQI:l
1I.a~..o III
.c::::I >0 III
U CI...... 0 III
. " .
c c
ClOt/QOle
l:.c: ... 0
.pO :J; ... . ""
C III Q1,j.l
....,....c:~al
llll""l'" Cl.1lI
... '.-1 Ill....
.... . CII ....
0. ,,~
OIl tIS U Ii
III ......1"1
en IILt:"'O
III "CI): c
" "
c ~ 0
"" lU C C l::
~ co
QI '-' 1Il.... ,.,j
... QI......
o 1Il"l:l III ::3
E.c:.... .......
... .. j., 0
01J C 0 u lI':
.c: 0 ... III III
~ E " .. 100
~l
z
:;:1
~I
;;
'"
"
Ii
o
,.
E
~
5
o
u
9
M
8
or
"
go
"OUo
~ 8 :g
6 0 9
~ :g
~ ~
b li
v u
oS is
" 8
Ii u
~ ] .~
01) !l 0
;; . u
~ 0
~ :~
'i u
, ~
,~ '1)
'i :g g
C2 ~ e
::; ;; ~
g 0 i'!
<n ~ .a
~ - 9
8.E
~ ~ ~
5 j ~
E u
a c
<:'= ~.~
gj ~ ~ ~
~ ~
>>;;
! 1 ~
& <3 ~
ci,i-
- tii '.1:1
'" 0
'E :1!
o ~
~ .c
oS :E
= ~
h
v 0.
;; "
'0 ~
g"
'"
s "
J! a
" ;1:
~ ~
. "
~ a
0. .
] 8"
g "
M
I J
8
'"
"
~
o
~
v
.
"
.3
"
~
.::
I
0"
""
"
""
00
V Q
~o
U ~
~Q
~
~.
,.
. .
o v
~.
.
~j
M
=~
~ C
.
o .
> "
~
. ~
~ v
" .
. 0
""
0"
.
. 0
., c
u
o .
~ 0
c
~ ~
. .
U~
o u
o 0
"~
till '"~_
~ ~ ~
~ w
~ . C
.....l .t:. '"
U ... 0
z .
8 ...: ~
o
~
M
"
o
o
~
"
.
o
"
U
o
~
u
~
M
~
=
C
o
v
~
~
"
"
."
>
~
.
o
0.
0.
.
o
"
"
M
.
"
"
~
o
o
"
,
~
;:
~
c
o
u
M .
"M
." .
"."
C"
o c
" "
c"
'" .
~
. 0
~ .
"
~
~
l!
~ ~
9~
~o v
;;
~ ~
~ 0
.s 5
-. ~
i:'
o
~
-:: e
v 0
:5 ~
_ v
o ';:
v "
~ "0
's a
5 v
o ;;
U il
" .c
~ ~
-' "
] E
.E
~ ~
~
~ v
0-5
.
~
~
.
"
"
~
o
,
~
M
o
"
~
M
~
"
"
~
o
"
~
C
0.
0.
o
.
o
,
. "
" ,
o
."
""
"~
M >
.~
" c
"~
~
o .
"0.
. "
. "
v .
u >>
~ci
~
u
~ ~
~~
0.0
~
~.
o
~ "
"
~ ~
. 0
~~
M
.
."
" 0
.
~ .
o ,
" u
. c
~~
Q
~ ~
" ~
ow
." 0
~
o 0.
~
.
~-
. .
e v
.
o .
~j
o
Me
."
.
~
o 0
. ~ .
.~ .
. " ~
~:;:E
o u
. " 0
" 0."
o
o
w
"
>
o
"
.
.
o
c
::
"
w
."
"
~
.
~
v
.
C
0.
8
0.
o
"
...
,:
'"
"
g,
v
is
Ii
V>
~
o
~
U
v
;;
~
o
o
o
.0
u
'il
.E
.;;
v
;;
.lJ
o
=
"
E
~
v
!h
.
v
~
.!l
v
F'
M
.
.!l
"
-g,
v
is
Ii
'"
'S
~
U
.!j
{j
.S
v
~
S
>>
E
o
"
;;
"
v
;;
v
>
.
"
g
!l
" E
~ ~
OJ 8
v '"
F' .
..,
~
~
~
...
<
"
z
'"
..
o
u
'"
"
:l
" v
.~ -5
;> a
" ~
'3 'C:
o .g
~ 0.
o v
::- ;::l
up.
.s g
~
.::: .g
o E
~ ~
~ ~
,. .
E ~
~ ~
5 ~
u g,
9 8
M 0.
" v
8.;;
" E
" ;;
s
,;
M
~ =
_ 0 "
~ ~ ~
" S ~
U ~ .~
~ .g 'K
0. = v
...
~
on
w
o
~
>
o
M
~
o
~
o
"
"
v
~
~
>
o
~
0.
C
"
o
.
.
o
M
"
~
"
~
~
v
"
"
~
o
o
e
<
o
"
M"
" ~
coo
O~
~ v
"0 "
"~ ,
.
~ 0 ~
u" 0
o "
~~
. 0
':::0 ...
". .
.c~ 0
, v
0." U
~ U .
~ . ~
Q... "" Q
.... .. 0111
... ....1Il:;:l
.,,". O~
Ii i III Q
~"i I5Jj
~ u 0
"":::l U >.
.... 0 -c C III
"t't.t:. ClII'"
-c 1111-00
a'g IU':: 1-0
II ...I-oGl
o III ILl )i
... ~ ~~..s
.....-c Gl..-l
.a ...., III
co. .... c....
..-l COD 0
1-00 U C l""I
~ C
....... .... II 0
1II11l 0 ..-l l:lo
1-0 U C ...
ILl 0 ... 0 III .
......... .t:. EN
III tIOlIll-o
.... >. ..-l ILl 0
'""'" 1-0....__
!311l..i1Ll~1U~
.:.:U1.c:......c
>.caGl...........c::
....... 1-0 U ....
..... ClllUllIlII
UCII.....N....N""t:I
.c C.... ..... III
ILl"''''''''' Ill........
.c Ill. lll....
..._ U..... CII........
O..-ll-olll.......
III .... 0 1Il 0 C
> III "'" e 1/1 e III
~ g: g,~ j~ ~
. ~ u
..;
... on..,
" ~"
"
u
:E
~
'"
Iii c
tn .9
j g
~ <2
~ .~
-3 -g
~ "
.~ '(3
'" :;
~ 8
'0 .~
~ ::;
i ~
~ ~
M 0
~ ~
as
9 v
~ -;
e ~
M 0
~ ~
0: :s
..,
~
o
.
"
~
u
o
,
8
o
"
~~
. c
~ .
o
o 0
e >
"~
.
. 0
~ 0
"
o .
" ~
" 0.
0. ~
" U
o
v "
.
O~
. .
. "
o
. 0
"'"
u
.~
OM
~~
" C"
~ 0"
M U U
~ ."
UOM
.>~
...co
o c
0" u
"
"M 0
M.
M "V
~ "
"~"
o c
o ~
" 0
" 0
U 00
o . 0
...... Ill....
c""
~ " "
0." W
41 Ill::
fj .~.g
. " ~
> . .
c ,~
~ "
0." 0
0.."
. OM
0.
" "
C .
C OM
~"
o 0 "
Cl ::~
C c
10....:.
~
v
"
j~c
~~~
M ~
:::l \~...""
.... -l.:::,1-o1-o
t: ~CI ~
Gl .....>.iU
c:. -........
~ ~ 6 ~
~ "'~
II/) '-//
J '1// J/2~
""I!
il
....
~ i ~ "
'" oS
.5 o!:
'" N ..
" 0 0 g " Iii
0 "
0 g oS ;::; 0 ~ "
~ '" 0
a . 0 5 0
0 0 5 ."
e - ei ." ~ '6
'S ,!l '" 0 'C '0 '"
~ " .g ~
0 0 ;; ~ 0. - ...
" .c 5 ~ '"
. ] 0 <: .c E ~ 1
.~ <> ~ g 5 '" '"
l ." .5 <;j
'" "
- ~ 5 51 ~
" il '" g -a ....
oS ~ 0 0 ~
0 1'1 'E 0 c ..
'" ] 0 0 ~
0 0 0 " 0 ~ ~
~ ei ~ 0 S
0 -a
0 0 0
->i '" '" }! .~
-Ii ~ .~ il 0 ....
0 . .5 ~ e
-0 ~ ~ '"
.5 -a -0 :ii ij
e 0
5 0 ~ ~ " c
~ Tl ~ " 0 .5
~ ~ e 0 '0
.e ~ 0 fj
<: ~ > 0 ....
-a " e ~ ~ a
0
.~ ... " .. 1iI g 0 l
"? 0
0 g '" :i3 Jl .~ 0
e '" ~ 0 0 '"
-0 "
. ~ " 0. oS :ii
c '" .5 5
~ c 5 a' . a -
~ 0. C 0
~ 0 " .0 " ." E
'" . ! :ii 0 ~ 0
.~ [ 0 " i
'" ~ -" ~ '" g '1/>
~ g .c .~ !l.
:ii :ii' 0
'" . 0 c 0
....
,.:
~
....
~
.
.
II
m
m
~
;;
N
*
~
~
~
e
~
"
I
,.
'"
",
rn
lQ
~
,.J
U
rn
rn
~
J.<.o
o
,.J
....
u
Z
~
o
u
o
c.:>
~
....
o
z
~
~ B
~~ !
do.
U~~!
~B~~~
o~'S
~i~~b
~ ~ ~~i~~8
.! 0\ ~j06.i~
.~ c .~~z,.
;I M.... cciS,1
Ul e t;: '.z .3
i ~ ~ !:I'~:H3
t zj ~ 5~m~~~
1.1'1 _:;t::i;-c"":i...
U ~~ ~~a~.d
tn .~ - g~~~d:ll
~o :E....~~~:i
c ....9"-"'..:l:!
sa U!I ~05~~~
_ ;Q~,.~o
~a3~~1i!
g~5~5
-"'ev'"
~qs
~~:...~
"'~~i!:~
g~ :
:sg ....
S ~
,
~
..
..
..
..
"
..
t-
.
,
11
.
..
..
..
..
..
,
..
..
..
o
..
o
... ..
..c ..
...
"'11'
.. c..
~.u
..>
'd.-4a..c .
.....::1. ..
IHj"~~
.~~~~
k 0.... 0
. co..
A>.C .-4
k-&olllllO :S
..........r-..c
IQOPtnU
..
..
I
a
..
,
..
H
.
>-
.
..
"
.
..
:l
..
..
..
...
.:
. ....>t.
.c >o......a
....,,::1...,
4olg:~B
c ......
:':c~~
e:r;:tN
i'~ti-;:
).taG 401
0.. C
.s g8S =
~ toll:-l
...,1d.QDo
. '" ,
1.~~.
w=' H..
.. . C 1\11
Jot...... .
,g....~'Zk
+I..."""u....
::I Do., c:::J
lS..i. i
. ...Q ~ k
.. II w'" CI
HA....::>
::lIGI.CI
...,.....c::.....
IllU4J>....
fillr::,g!
.a.
-alii::>> CD
..o.:a
~.. >.~..,
>00 0
'0............
..... 01> i
"c.
.lla;j;:l'l!
:8iJ ..
.. 0 '0.
~i~1 :1
PI.... . k
'h"'..c::. .
O~a.
c'O....'O.
IIC.c'tJk
UlIIlI;JIIRt
.
~
~
~
a
..
.
.
.
~
.
.
.
~
.
.
...
.
.
a
tl
.......
a.,
....
....;'D
:!.3
"a~
~....
.... 0
~ a!l,;
t~~
.~.?l'i:
oc.-
00:1-
" o.
"'D~ k
\O.z~ _
..~o~
.....
II o'D r::
. s::'" 0
.....~
....~ =
+loe.
":'fi.a
.........rot
.....c::.c::::
"~~
.....on....
til'i;....
~-:lt:1l
oa..
>''0 D. At
.... ...
~B'fI:"'"
~;j tL3
.........
a.a a.
Ao.... JI 0
IllI...H....
....oc..
........~~.Q
.oa.....oa
U C r:: h"
oS ".. ~ g
......c::II,c
~U..
izi5S
.!l...~.
.0 "
~i~g!
.. ."d.
~J~r8z
.., 0;:: =-...
--k......... 0
II.... Hk
a.... 0 .
1I1IlI.... .....
km.-
>oU III k~
....):.,8...
gog",!
:::".
~"~fi;
.. a.
..........3....
. .. .
~ G;:5
.c::......
...:....~Bg
S.... 0...
.. ~a.o..
...
. >>
.c:....... 0
tt~J;Ol""
..
~
1
...
..
,
E.,
_ :;1:>-
E ~:; "
:91~,f
t,n.
o. . .
o~ g~
.5 Q,J{ ;
::i!.... _ ~
o~..
~=Ji
. i .,...
...I - III '
Ulf !
.
...,
;;;
....
j
..,
~
-..
sa
..
o.
n
..
..
...
H.
PH
..
h
..
'"
~
..
.
"
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
i
m
~
~
~
~
,.
e
~
~
"
I
~
~\
,.
"
'i'
m
i:'
N
..
..
..
"
..."
...
..",
.~
~.N
.~
,,~.
~" ..
...
......
........... c
lI.....t .'" ·
O~..:;:U
... HCI:
. ....
B~.;~~~
C.....~ ~.,
..u...=-
...... a.
~ G'o.ll ~
;..~~.-.4
u. ...... toa
:.a......H;
O'!l-" 0'"
........0 .1:
::I ........0
.... O.,c t::....
.31 biOI.....
~.c.B~!e~
UO 0.0
0...-10 ...oa....
.-4.c:... s::...t.... U
,;;:11 ....;:....
..~~ag...
~Z'~.0-4U~
." "Bll~.c
.oe ,::.....
.~....W.ttrl
.... .....~
............ ....
01.10....;1.,,'"
C~....!Pt.~
>.b". i~Dt
,Q. 01 Go-
'II...~C.....
:Olegb.l
Ill'" ...... C
. c::oa........
..::I.... ..Q III
UO~~...-t ...
~=~ogE'9
~ '"
'" .g
'" 0
~U
e .S
05 ~
~ l1J
~
. '"
~ .S
'"
S
'"
to
'"
~
o
05
"
.8
C
~l
'" ."
" '5
-3 "0
U :;
..
~ ~
::>
-ll 0
5 j ~
'" .. ~
~ .3 ~
~ ~ ~
c -5 ~.
3 .~ ("'\
,Q ~ .
~ ;3 ~
. " '"
~ ~ 6
"
~
C
C 0
.2 ~ "0
g e ~
] ~ .~
c ..d -ci
8 ~ .g
:E 0 ::
.... 11 ]
S ~ ~
!:l ~. ~
"3 B r!
~ ~ ~
.... l:! c
.M 0 ~
C '" "
M. a Q.,
~ ~ ~
:; 'E ·
~ 4) 0
o ,5 ~
~d
~ {8
c ..!:l '"
.~ ~ ~
8 .~ ~
!i ~ 'a
t:! ~ ] .J;;
~ ] 5 u
5: .~ e ~
....".'0."..."1:1
fi~~~~c!.:='~5;
. "&
:~!I!~~~.1;i
.."" -=&0 0........
~ -i'; .....~~Of""l. .
"d~......-t"'kC~.~~
.o"'~Il:.c.O.C>N
u .........c: "'00
... ....... .............. ....
D..fq~:t:",O>.o....
C:~:5ti..s::c....~~~
... ..,u.t/t....
oa .:. c... .... ..
~.fi..:.:II!~!.....~
~....!1IO....-t....B 1:10
....(j O..-4...t'" .1:10
t oS & u "!. 0 ... e...;.... i~
8. aON~t !Jo..
.u-...... .cfift......
.C.OII':. ..,;c
...t II J:............... ....
..,.... .::s .c u.... toe
u~"'.8ti......c. .'0
II.Q.O.... !Jouo..
It g."..c~~""i.:
Hl;toetJIlH:I. 'i ~.
!Joe 0 toe" 0 toe
"~.-t po."''''.'tJ
.c ....!oa.c......-4t\1c'U
........ .14....0......,.;::.
;'i.!.8.:J~~~ItI..
ft...... .... J: ........"....Q
OOW -=c.....sJ...;.8o
... .J:.... 11::1. ..
:: fii.~ tJlC~. ~ Ii....";:
....c. c
,5.... .........g....'d
~ ~~=......~~::
."''lSU. ....>M.....,...o
,;.!t ~: ~=~.a 81'ii
N
"
~
.;
c
'C
C
~
.c
u
:E
.
'"
to
'"
]
o
11
.
"3
~
'0
u
'"
o
.g
~ .;
o ~
~ .s
~ g
M ~
'" 0
. 0
~-S
a'O
~ ~
'" 0
~ ~
* j
is: 'ij
'"
...
."0"" u.::I.... 0..
..~...~o~..BB
g. tJ':;j>'Au.
~... ~..~".
tJl....t. .. c......: J:
o In. ov.....
...0........... ..
..NftNA.:..'"
3.... it='g....oa.c
..:fi&~e.l1:
........ ... tal.... > J:
..c....o..,..
......... ::I:.o~a'
t'O~8 ~a;~ 5fi!
"c ~c oi.oo...
0.... . u
......cN.II:...:fi....
.............. '._ o.
iG.... !~iB ~~ =~
:e-8:1* ....". ~.
~ai.fi5~~!....;;;
B..... -....,........
:05 .fi,,:J~!.s 3~tJ
........ .... e....c
e-'g'tf...~..'Uou=
o!:!...>o.u.~
ct -..,. u :.........=1)'....
...t:lti U:::l-;:~liItoe8:
~c Ii 0 tp~1i ~!Joe
:: g1l~ ~'.s:: IS 0'= ~
. .0.... u ".a
~~~~~~.~i....tI
1:c~~~=ic;~..
~::c~~G~:~&l
s I i~;::5~ I.~ ~
"
~
'"
.~ 'g ~ ~
go 8. a a
a ~ 0 ~
-5 ::I ~ go
" '" is @
9 .~ :;
~ ~ V) a
(..l (lJ ~ -s
:E ~ :; ~
~ 'g. ~ .!a
i:'ii e :> .g
V) "t:l (lJ '0
i :i :i .s
... ~ ..c ..c
Cl ~ u .;5
~ c '0 .... 0::
4J cd "" ;l: iii
~ " .,g ;! 4J
~ iLl u ti -s
'0 ~ > '0
~~~~~
.s a :g .~>- ~
'0 0.. >. e -g
~.J:l tU
s::: "t:l "E ~ ;:::
N~>~N
. ~ e 5 .
a e is: 8 ~
a p. tU .= tU
9 0 .8 i: ~
J:! C '" ~ 0
e ~ E ~ ~
~ :::l ..c .g ~
:3 5 .~ :.a i;l
15: i:i ~ -g :c
~
...
." ..
...~..
...
ii".:!
......
t.e
-:~
..~ .
~,,1l
:::..
...
:;;.!
...
5G;!l
t::~
.~
l.'ll .
......:
....i
~.. ~
. 1.!.t''U
.....0--4.
">..
t:,,4t,S
o.UI.!
11.~"""
::HC=
...~
...
B...
~J\''''~.
...~:l
.... H
lit:
i. ·
o e... g.
11;" 0'::;
..
..... I.!." .'IS",.
o c....~ .....CM..
c~ 0 owfi.B g
.. tB 0 . ".
...... I.!
..... .>..... e.
O..M.cO"'....
'G Ao....... tJl ~.
..6.~'il..B
~ou~l1 lb ,
" !Jo........ c
...~.ca..a..~o
I.! o.c. --4
:l .........
fjd1iil~=l
.~,=""""H",
>.~ - ...,
a:.:L~13eg&
....o.Jl~~U
l! ll.:fi ~..... 0 ~
:3. ...".... 0 0
1:."..~....~
~fi ;~fi itet;
"..,,3 D..
=..... U;,;a.
llIetJIg .
"'....oc:...,u~
r:CD...............c.+J
ii" 101" a..... c
>o"Sa~e.... ~
~~i~agHE
.e.; d:::
.:..........:.>ot:71
0.. .M........
..... . >J1.....
~ -fUJ --;:.::::
'tI~.... au.
'U'CI.a....0...c
.c.. ),0.... Doow....
..;
:l '"
;'/4"'- L/3
;:;
~
~
.
'"
~
f;j
~
"'
~
~
e
~
~
,
n
,
m
w
"
..
~
..
..
'"
.....,
...
..
.i:'
~...,
.~
,Q".
",Q",
...
......
"
o
~
I
. .oO"'............_C".1lli
.a.O""'4 0.....,P't G e >0.... S:::;H
Ii~.g"':i'fi";:.:::.... ..
~""N"':J : ..O....C.
.t5J~5G~t-!~~C:~o5
~.~.~~og.S5~:=.>~
. Do....>>.... >'w ~ 0 ....
B:~~lt~8!.t~:3~.
00. ...0....... 0....0 ..
"oB~ ~~5.!la5~- .~"
! "u ec .... u: ..... .... 0.::1'"
"NU~80~~5."'.J.i.~
0.... ::IG~I;U..GI .. ::I_
~""g. ~ -g.::I3- 11 .~:
:'i!-::>. ~~~~~~g~~~
):OS.'A.'a.~~4oI~t.....~
l.k~.. ..GI~C "'........0..
.~O....~..... ....0,:;. lIS.
lie .: .~....b.8~:I.:51..z
c:!: : ~H~.U~"" .....0
O::l~~):~g ~~~>....~~.....
OU..... s:: -::lI'tf .CllllO.....
II):."... ....0...... lllOo .1:.
.... .-4 >00 S::::I,c: > Ii! 1-IE-t"O
..c:...k.........O....OE-t~...... ..
....UO........l-lk3.. ~ ..
.~):>""...c:1::o (j!tlg.1:
:):..~'fi+l:lltC .~""fjc:~=
.... Po .. O..e _.
g....o.. ~):~~. ...~.....
1:.......0...: .......... i~ tJt:t.....
t= ...g:+11c:~g~ 1:~ .!
o.~~ ..l.:l-e.....g"u 'i "~.
Do...t....N....O::l.. ..>. 0:1
~~g~.~I~t.!~:=.t
u....u~....o.....:5 .... .c:.fi
..>.."'0.,0. "''''>.u......
.Qc:a..aAo...uC)C.......'Uc::J..c:
~.O..~.::J.OO....k~
"
"
o "
.~ .g
~ 'S:
~ e
'" 0.
-"
- "
M .
a ~
.= 0
~ .SO
" ~
~ ..
.~ u
e :€
:;, ~
:3 ;:;
E is
~ 5
~ 0
~
. ~
2 ~
'" .
Iii .c
on 0
~ j
~
11 :is
-3 o~
,8 e
~ 8
~ ~
'"
Iii
~ ~
~
"
"
.
~ "
"' .~-
'4
~ "
~ :s
'" "
a. ~
g ~
-n -g
> '"
.g fjj
~ U
<<l -s
~ ~
] ;
~ ~ rA
- 0 u
U '::l eJl
g :a 8.
" " "
~ 8 0
~ ~ ~
~ .15 ~
<<l g U
~ :is E
g ~ a
o~ ~ ';i
."'_ .0 '"
_ 1::l O::l
Os .g :;
....
...
"
.
.c
u
u
!l
"
u '<3
05 '"
.B .~
~ ~
~ u
!j,05
. .
0.05
" U
a 0
.~ ; ~
:::I U d
1::l c: u:
;.a c.i do)
g iij oS
Co en .5
05 ~ r::l
~ ~ u
:s Cl II
" " "
<8 ~ g_
"3
o 8
~ ..
~ ~ ~
. 0
0. u ."
8 05 "
J. .5 ::i
<E !::..c:
e .g t::
~ a"':
o:s or:: 5:
0: '8 ~
"'"
;
\
..,
;1
....,
~
..
~
"il
;I
.
""!
~
...
.
~
.
.
...
..
..
.
o
~
...
.
..
"
"
.
o
...
..
...
o
.
'"
.
'"
.
.
.
.
~ .
","
.0
.
~
'z.!l
)'//J-i1i
Ii
"
.
o
'"
.2
.gf
'a
~
.>l
.
~
:il
8
II
0.
.E
N
....
~.. ~
00.
...
..~.
00'
.~
il'~-;;
....0
!Bj
>I...
0..
- ..
-..
... .
~.....
~::....
.,Q..
>0-;-
.. .
..'"
...
.. .
s::..!l
.z>
~ .
...~...
a
.. .
0."
~".
.~
. .
.~.
o ...
"'~5
1::5"
0......
~.. .
..... .
... ........
~..
.u.>
.c....
&4..........
.&oJ o. ...... .
..&oJ lot >o...t..
.c: ........u...
.&oJF.....tJ'I)oroot::J
.:; i~-;: (::.&oJ
3.&.1 '!Ic....i:
,c..k...
""B3~:;lB
Pi.!j~.!j
~".... ..5~
0"'''
>.I'd.cc
... .... 0 a....
......uu...t.
~:I~~""u.'"
~...'i:8g.s
IIIH~>o...
1: ..... = Z'
~ . ~~.g....
. >.z.::.&oJ'5'"
.::: PoC.... ~
t:.,"'.:J... c
>.~........,eo~
Qlk...t.Q '00
... 0 :s.. >
.......ti..:;.1-I
.......t........:
:.:a'5.a~.Q.
o .......,.....104
C'tI ...u.....
.:t~6"'~~
...t.....:..Po
.~~.......a~
! of"4-;:~f"4.
. >0101......
...... ..
....>0.. >
~~fi;B~~
"'
....
.,
,
4
"
.
o
...
II
..
.
...
.c
ll.
.
"
=
. .
.
."
fie
~"
0"
,Q~
...
~"
00
..
....
....
..c
,z~
.
. .
~.
o.
"'B
'"
"'"
5~
,Q.
..
"
..
...>
tl.!l
.... "'....~....'
"'CCOU"Ck';;~
......... "004.-4::t ::l
.~OePoj:l,..kl!l.
o . .!l . ~
.... k 00 B
.. ..-4 k id ~
"S ......~ uH.f_,
iSB .!jll.!..a:
1l=]'~j.8:~
C:f"4 = l....rt~::J \,,:1
,Qo......:;.&oJ1J4
.!j2bo~a.8.~~
~~..~~~ J."
~....tlfl l!itL
.!lfi.~.B.5.~~_,;
u ~. .~...t.fo'i'o
...t.-t.c: b''Ot:. ttij. .
"0;: 1lI~. s:: ....
.z........DtOOOO~
.004 :J II D.... . <,
'O...t s:: . e G ~ \"
o :. O.c: >oD..-t..1
~..c~"'.~""G
II t I-I..c::.c:.... Qll
8:fi):.....-;~
. ~ .g.>o> '"
...t C lot C ..a II .~
~~. tfl<a .!o
.. ..c....'W.".
... ",c+lll +I.Q III t
o l: 0 0 J....r-t s.
t-;.: ..! ....~::'2.;!:
1-1........... :--,;
~ e ~ : 8 . .... :~
.'" U::l 0 C III ,,I
g;~~gb3~~;1
..
....
....
~
,
j
.
"'
....
.,
"
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
~
i
I
I
m
w
~
n
N
~
~
~
~
I
I
I
I
e
"
"
~
,
f~;
I
:'l
"
I
"~I
L~'
:~i
N
..
..
..
'"
....
...
..
.~
"...
.ae.
".Q '"
...
......
. 1'1
; .
~ ;;
:a ~
~J
. ..
IX "g
~ S
'" 0.
a .s
" .
~ ~
"3 0
~ 1;l
'0 '<l
"
'"
" ..;
-S lit
'0 8..
'1'
~ ~ .~
0;1 0 ~
!XI U .;0
:: ~ "s
~ >. <II
. .c .IJ
91'~
~ 8 ~
e . ..;
~ p
0;1 ;;j ~
s: ~ !.
'"
iii
'"
'"
e
o
"
"
.
"3
,~
u
"
'"
"
-s
,S
11
.!J
.IJ
~
.
.9
"
~
'~
'5
~
2
~
.
"
c
.
~
..
N
~
N
....
..
>
..
113
ob-ll
.......
....
:ts
~.
..
..oc
.'" e
~~i!
",.
~l:J'g
~~1
g..ll.
.".3
"0
.
~.'"
,.:;~=
....
..
,,8"
0",..
...
It-ll~
"!ic
..'" 0
c ..
.....
....
."0
...0
..>...
...
"'..
.!~J! ~~tfi3~
4I.a.f.J .c:.....c....
:II... In ....1)'~ e ~
......0 .....>t.~
~.:. "gPt.at
. lot ......
5~.! Ii -ii!!.,:
5.= .... 110
8..~. -:'01.:10:;:
.~c.!::......Eu
0-' > ... ::s b tp"--r4
o U ~ 3 a . .. >on u t
.... .,. .. Qo~...."" .
....,c.... oao.."e
'tiC,...."". 1"
.0.coW "I'tri
........,.~.I::...... ~
u._ .o~......
. lot lot. ..... ....:..Q
'ti...~ ~...........,.
.g.. ~~~Ha.......
s:.~t:......Do 'r"Iog
oO'tJ1d ir~sie~fi
.""'..".".....0"'.....
;;~.::.~....~.11=-
C"I....~.....>...c....
.1rI .........'0..:::3.........
.M....rot..,'":......... 0
.t:";~" i::l >oi: o~~
.... . Qo.... ." ~.... . . .
c.c::.Oc. c......
..... COHc.C::f.
C .. ............ H. lot
0"".::.&.1 ~ ... 1:....
g.o...~:~g8.t:fi
11....'tI OUl..... c. 8fi
~I~ ~.fiD..C2g'
......a... .........
a~:: &t!~.g afi~:
.;
..
..
N
."
N
~ 'Ci
.S! 0
-a~
0. e
. "
c >
o " .
'1j -5 a
~ sf 9
'u 0'1
e - Jj
- ~ a-
s.. :;l N a
.5 a e a,..;
.... ..., 0 _
o .5 <.t: 6 [jj
] ] ~ :8 g
; .; ~ 'C u:
~ ,J=; 8 ~ <II
...... U ~ "0 :s
'"
N
C'tll.:a>.r:....O....I:JIC'tlI.o
~; 8~ 0 g....~.5....:;ti....
+J >. 0....... Do::ll.:I 0 ....
.....A. "'"-_._ C.Q.. ..c.....
-. ........,-........ .....0.
bl::ll ..-t...o.!........> ""
a.ev :a..... Q,,Q u. ....
::lI"".).:lI....~. Ck~.cllft
_>u .... &lIe.... W.,.N
o....~a ~1.:: It >.:1 ~""
ccq: !.. :::~..ao
~5 ~g,~.~..k.a...
o......oug"f'f .c
.........c:N.........O .au..
Nf'4.AJ,tO"'U ......-11.. ............
.. ::lI.... ... >t III Po ...
.1::" .....a>-....."..a..c.c.
.... "u:a....tic ..... ....
....&:;P..~a 8~""Ir;:iliL1
~:8~~~.tJ~:.gg~~1
.. .. > '" 0"'.... "'''
c u......s::....g".00'4
.sOtfiP.b.!J.a:~ $b.-a
_. .iJJ.l.... u.....=-........
.....Po .....................:::....
!a!1'a~fi5ii~::i:~!
u., ...'"' u c .... s.
;:.!..c.3c >,....,;... 5!'UA:I
.">"'."'51-1 e.........
"............. .c:..-t.~.::lI.-:1..
................ >... 0",&.1-........
OOId.cC -:: ::J..c....u~
..... l2' 0'" - >,....,. !.. ,.
.............. .'tS.g.......22..c
.~co 1::c8k+lo ;feg
..... .0..............2.......
.......UCOti.H..j... .
Cllii1~~~ ~ ..~ i:~lr'"
H............... ... ..".....
"'....c u o. u...." c:: ....'0...
.:t:.g8'~e~~"..!:;:a
~ 5 : ~ ~M ~ ~B ~:5 Z 3 j ..
Q
..
'"
N jtf /J ' if;{
"
c
"I:: OJ) "-
~ ~ E
c 0
o 0
U E
.. .
E "
"2 B
5 ]
,.,
"
.
~
..
.
"
"
:s
.
~
c
'2
jj .;
" c
c .
... e g
~ ~ a
'0 ~ E
<II b ~
1:'1 "0; III
~ ~ ~
-S 0
" 0.
.g ~
H
@ th
. "
:3 g
. c
. U
"d 8 B~
III @.;S
<5 ~
c ~ 0
c ~ ~
~ it"~ ~
8 .g is .~
~
c
~
0.
"
~
o
e-
o.
"
r=
"
N
~.. ..ll.ll ..
_ o~ 5:::
>... 'tI'tI""....
j"'........*
.. ..g:f;:>t
""310'11"
J,;31 u......
_ "IPC:':::
"'fi-ut'c:...u
... c.... .
~ . ... '..
o '" ....
.c S"...~ ~_:.
..... 0 _........
.ug "0-4~~~
...,g.. If.... -
.0 ....c..
~..!l~311...~
aB!a.~=~J
.... c: .. e So+l
+J. ... u.....
&~ .~~..~ B
";l ~oa""..."" >-oIJ'"
.... . 0-4+1...0
_gJ4>o-n;:It.
............ Do
..';Jg.=~u.~
.:Ie~ .~5~
Cat..,.,j .,.,j
~"'.c.c.!"".
...........0.
... u.... ...
>tCIta.....c>t
:::gt......~J
~u~l~..
o....~ulc"'""'tt
~~~g~-.: I.
~~~8'g.~.....
~~&~~3z~
..
..
...
'"
.
8
.c
'0
"
c
~
o
;;
,
"
:;
~
,S
"
.
.9
...'"
... 0
...0
~5~
!...o:
U.ZS
Uc..
.0
.....
......
.1:1.
>t~c
~!t.,.,j
u."
..
0.....
",8*
~J>t
" .
Ii~~
"0"
.:J It .
""ll"
.... 0
.
...-gro::::
;-:-
.....
· e ..:l
.........
CON
.c 0
.0>0'"
>tUNs:
..-0
.=e>1
~.~~
_.... 0
. .
~~g~
"
.. "'.
....c
... ..
"" '"
..0
.c.'"
.a.
..,
...
...
,
'}
""
:!
.
..,
,
i,
""
..,
,
...
.
""
,
.
.,
,
c~ ...... .
" a. .~'" "
. ..a~ .. ~
~ ..~ ...... ....
,
.... c.. ",. . . ..,
" .0 .~ .. ...
ii ... ..... ...... .. ~
.. J:i~ go . ...
.'" .:1 .. U ~
~ ~ ..
... .1!~ ~c . ...
0'" all .. Ii:
.. ~.:: ,
..~ .0 .. ""I
. ~
m C .Ii- ~.. c
~ ll~ .. j
~ >H Sol . ..
0 8~ .s".'" H:: c
~ 1I.t: : a .
..
" tfi"-;; 0" .. ~
~ ..... ...... . -
~ CU "'~ .: ~
. . . ..
~ 0.... . ..... a.
!:. !WON. 0 .. 'fi
~. .~ c. a ....
~ ... ~..tll ". 0 .
c ....... . 'E. ~ .
0.. . II Do"" .. '" . .... ...
00 :~ 1. ...... . 0 ~ .
.0. .. C ......
..... ~ . .. u..
,-.: i. ~ a. .. .. .
. ~ .. :9
c ..... 0 II c. 0
.~ ....:5..... o.c .. .0
..0 C ... .... .. ..u ...
..U . >.M~ ..~ C ...
i: 0 . . ~ .
" >- ,Q"''O ." o.
...... .= ..-4- ilo~ ~ " ,
.... ." II 0 ~ :;::1
..... . g,
CD. -:1;'" .... 0
fi. .'0 C" C..
~ -=1:5 .. ~ ~.. ..
.. "Ii . II a a..
,., .. ... .- e .. .. uu ,
" .. ...~ tl:'P.o >..
... ....e ~ 00
~ .. . Go... .:I, 0 ...... ':\'
'" :!l5.. SJ ~ l .. ..
0 .." ~ ....
" ... 5lWa o. ~ DD
.. -.-" ... ....
" .1;- .a~ ~ . cc
'" 1:>.. "0 .c .....
, ~... ..... H~~J .... .. ~....
~~ Be. "'0. .. .
.~ '" ilo. '"
, ~~ ~ .co JL//lrLj~~3
'" 1::' c.. a
'"
" ...... .~.c .. ...
.1>)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
.0- ~
S~~ ~
f 001 ~;l;
a ~ 8 ... ~
I-~ !e.
I
I
I
"' ~
U6 !
~ ~ ~ ~
0- " .
.,~~~~
u ."
z<!~ti2
02~"':J
'" ~ ~ ~
C!;:: '" 0
I-U '0 0 u
1-": :;l ~
"' . 0
a.. < ~
I
I
I
I
,
< 0
.. ^
l"'''' "''''0:'''
~~;~H~i
O:IlCU<lJo.'"
~<~i,(d
"~a..i~H
~Olt",uX:t
~~ BEEs
.. <:J '" ~ ([ I I
I
~
~
..,
o
o
~
0>
~
..,
'"
~
~
~
'"
~
i:'
-
o
"
.c
.
...
o
~
o
'"
" ~
o
" -
- ~
" "
c:.... ;>0 ~
0...... ru U 0
Ul.....~ c: 11-4
'CurnlUl1l....
l-IItt'-'ll:7l::l......
IlI"">oCCotI
" .u
U.-l "',j,J >
....lll......r.:.c
CC.j.J:llll III
c.c:: Ii.:: +.I
." lUU 0.+.1 U:I
c: Ii ,,1-1.....
'" C 'I-!.-l ::l >
.....oo.vo
C I-l :>0 ra.. III
.....>o'u ......
. > +J ~ \O::l
rnc:.....'I/r--J::
::tlW U"MU
. .
~".
_" 0
" 0
"""
.0"
2 11-4 ~
0-0>
"'"
~~"
>, .
"0"
..~"
.
~"'u
-~
+.I~ 010'1
c:-cc
. ~~
S+.ICC
UI-l-l.-4
......Ollle
OoCdH:1
o.iUE-icn
0'"
'" u
,,~ 0
+I U o.:z:
':i; g,~=
t.lEl..-tu
OHOrn
.
'"
'"
"
~ .
" .
~ 0
_ 0
" "
.. "
-
. 0
" '"
"
o "
0. .
'" "
"
.
u
'"
"
~
"
~
-
"
..
-
"
-
~
"
"
-
.
"
~
-
"
o
~
"
-
"
o
'"
.
~ u
" ~
~ ~
'" ~
"
"
" .
. "
. "
.
" 0
0. "
.
" "
"
. -
> '"
.
"
~ "
" "
... ~
>
o
o "
,., 0
""
. "
'" -
"
"
o
o
...
/ L-/ /1-Lj 7
t<l ~
a fi
'fl -a S
.u c: c: 8
tn .g .g C
...... :,:; a e
N -c 'C t.::
~ ';5 .~
~a.!!..::
:::l "E ::: 0
a .~ .s ~
0. e a ~
0:: ..::- 'S ~
~ ] 'go ~
s ~ '" ]
-€I ~ B .9
~ g "3 ~
is ~ 8 c..
.s 3: u .5
c:.~.s ~
o := <II
~ :g .:: e
> 0= ...g
.~ ! J ~
E ~ [ c:
8 ;::l ~ c:
a ] ~ .~
u 0 c -
6 .~ .g g
~ ll*,il
ag e:, 's ~
00
'"
"
u
-
i XI
~ u
~
~ >
- "
". .
= en Ql .Q
. "
~ ~ " ~
o l-l +J 0
" . -
.... l:: .c:: +l
> (&:I +.I U
" -
w -g g i'
...... III .... ....
- .
~ -;;: ~
. " u
S " "
. . 0
8: g ~
o " "
'" ~ "
>
" " "
.. .. "
- ~
" u >
" '"
.. "
. 0
:5 ~ g
o
" " u
. .
~ ~ ~
~ 0-
> .
. "
" 0.
.
> '"
- ~
" ..
.
'" "
"
o
0.
.
'"
'"
. "
,... '001
~ ~
o "
... .
- "
" "
o "
~ " .
" " "
- - -
. '"
l-I Ql.....
o III 4J ""'
III ::l .... 0
~ ,g 2 8-
c: +J ::l El
~ - ~
_ 0 "
+I III c: u::I
" ."
.. 0
u ..c:: +J ....
" 0 "
~ .-
III l-I U I-l
.c:: CIl..... Ql
+l "0...... a.
.... ."" 0
IU 1Il 1::......
> I:: 0'1 >.
IU 0 ."" -I-l
."" U U:I ....
~ ~
IU >. "'....
.0 _ .c
S . ~
. .0"
>" -
."" 0 a.
o " S
"> 0
IU $.l Ul U
> . .
Ql u:l .""
IU ): 3: IU .o.J QI"
UI 0 0 g:; .... Ul
=' ,...j:r: >::l
~ QI >......
tJ ,...j.Q "'.o.J.-l
g:; '" -I-l U <'(I
~ I:: ,...j " 0 <'(I c:
o IU QI 0
.... > ..... $.l 0'1 ....
>..o.J Q1...... Q) c: -I-l
c: III ,...j ..... ): .... III
III Q) /.I 0 JI: Ql
0.. $.l III c: ,...j U $.l
e U W III U
o Q) 0 " c: >. IU
U $.l .j.J ."" 0 ~ $.l
"
.
u
o
"
.
"
.
.
"
o
.
.
~
"
o
""
"
.
'"
~
"
~
s
.
"
"
~
.
u
o
.
u
""
..
~
o
'"
~
.
.
o
o
~
"
-
"
.
0.
o
,
,.,
"
~
~
~
.0
~
"
-
0-
S
o
u
00
N
" .
... 0
o .
o .
> ""
" .
IU U .....
...... "O.Q ......c:
QI 0 Ql ..c:-I-l
~ (1l ~ ~ 3: c:
..c: U 0 U .j.J 0
.j.J c:...... c:
III c: ttI (1l c:
~.~....~~~
..c: ...... >..u 0 c:
.u ....,...j u.....
c:...... -I-l 0..
QI 0'1 ::l III ttI 0
0'1..... ........c: .....
"0 Ul ,jJ..c:......
11I QI .j.J 0
............Q QI
~o.....t3~
c:................ c:
.lo( QI .......... QI 11I
U > ): QI rtl Iol
III QI ..Q c: QI
...... 1Il 0......
"0 $.l Q) 0........
...... QI QI 3: Ul ....
::l ..c: JI: QI "0
o .... III $.l
-; 0 2 rtl
.j.J 0 c: QI
g:; .... 0 0'l.Q
1-+ III rtl.... c:
til Ill..... rtl ....
U 0 "
...... c: Q1.-1 lU
III 0 "0 U 0..
-I-l..... c: Ql QI
c: c: Ql 0 $.l Iol
W ..... ..c: U 0.. Ql
e c.. .o.J ..c:
~~~~.B'~
a. o..c: "0 ltl
::l .j.J $.l Ql;:::
en QI .......c:,jJ
U 0 Ql rtl
c: rtl ..c: '-1 QI
W ,jJ......,jJ
k -I-l 0. l!j
Q> U ..c: e U
...... <1S U 0 .....
...... 0. <1S U -0
-I e QI U c:
-0 ..... Iol ltl .....
o
.
U
.
III ..... "0
" 0
. " .
~
-
.
~
.
.0
..
.rA!
~
..,
..
,
l
t'
""!
...
,
:."f
'-J
,
.
..,
...
""!
~
.
"
.
" ""!
~
.
.
..
" a J
= j~
0 ....
"0
.
. 0. =
0 k 0
. o .
~ "U k
0. U .
~~ " ""!
"'. .
. "j .
~ .
.. ,;; ..~ . u r~
" . .. ~ '"
~ "'. ~ =
= . o. > ~
0 k ::1" · . = "'l
. o .. '" .,
. U ..k " .
= = .... " 1;; k
0 ., .. ..
., '" .... Z k
" . .
. = "
. .. k
. 0 "'I
'" "0 0.
= '"
,.. 0 ,..
= ~ . .1.:
. ~ . ~
0 c =
= . " 0 ~
0 > = ~ "
. 0 . " u ,
"0" .. ~ .=z
k~ "'0
.~ . 0 ., .
..~ 0 k o,,~
U ,.. ~ "'Ok
., > ."0 .
"'" "0 = ~=O
~ ~ .. '0 ='...:1 ..,
0 . 0 0
=,.. 0 uu c:rz. .
.k .. ~ '" 0 .
.....IllN '" ~ .. '" z j
o. 0
k. U
'.0'" t
. . . 0 u Fill /1
""" .. " u ~
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
"
,
I
,
,?
I
I
I
I
~ I
I
I
I
EJ
>
hi
M
II:
N
~
~
~
A
.
.
::!
~
&
gj
<0
.
a::
~
<:J
'"
~
z:
~
.
.
.
~
>
.
~
.
"
U
M
o
..
.
ft .
U ~
.; ~
. M
..~
..~
t:i3
. .
'Ga.. ..
~. .
.A~ ..
.. ~.
...~
.c:l:ll>
. ~ 0
.. c:l "" ..
"'0 ~
"'....0:::1
........J::
_,.,NU
2
~
~
9 '"
"R .~ c;j
~ ~ c:
- 9 ~ ~ .~
l:! 1-0 tI.l B ~.
.~ ~ II) ] ~
.e~c~
= ~ '0 8 ~
~ ~ tI.l -a ~
"' 0. ." .a M
.:: -g 'g.s !:!
e 'C ~ ~ 0.
o 8. < ~ ~
.s ~ ~ ; u
~'> :a "'0 -5
~ e \0 .9 (;i
a (,J 8 g -5
'~~'~gg
Q. ; ~ ~ 's
~-c~etl
::l ~ 0 ~ .s u
~ '3 .~ !:! 1;1 'e'
;a 'a CI:l II) ..r:: 0..
~ 13 c ;s ~ ~
~.dEiJ-
-g "2 't:\ II) II) '0
o"'~~~c
c: 5 -B ~ c ~
.~ g i1 ... ,9 ...
S 8 .5 g (;i 1;;l
"c 't:\ ~ ~
9 n (J 0. u
'8- "g l:! 1;;l !:!o..~
!3 0 e 1;;l u
o c.. ~ u 0:: .g,
,. 11 e ;:: "' -0
'"
N
~
::
::!
..-
_0
6~-!
~.
. ~M
~ . 0
~~
e ~::
... 0
~w...
. .
8.:~
.:~..
"u 0
. . 0
1:;;1 :
.!~ ~
~.....
." "
... .. ~
~iS,.t:I
! ~
. ."
~. 0
. w.
a~u
>..
u..~
~~.e
~G=
. ..
~'og~
::: tot::
.=d....o
. ".
u.a c:l =
0..... .. ..
. .
u ... .,...
l-t~.:i >-
. ".
~""
....::so
....~::..
.c:t...
....at
t:: :::.3~
.
.
.
Q
,
. . ~
0:-".' ..
...A.... ...... .. <III .
.... ......u...:c~
.s~~..,........~.
..... 0 .. .. .. s:I.... ..
.:lC>.c ".0
.... ...... &.I" .c a
1~...~....lu.
:....cc:..~
.=: 9;ao '1'::.11
.... ..,.!l' 0 ;;.. .......
.. u .. P4 ..
,..,.. a a loloG.......
........." 0.., .. ... :t ...
.-4 III .c ..
....a.........
.........a.0.... I:l
.. .II..c:..... IN 0
........ to...c
.. ..0..
::~1:~.....!I'5~
o-i u .c ~ 0
a..~~..c..~~
~..a..lI....a
.. .a...."o..a.
..,... ....0......
tool a.....a. .
.N~O cu.
.... o..o.ou....
1lIl1il....~.~u~~
tool . l:Io" ... 0 .
N'V::I 0",,'" ClI....
QQ.-4.O U
.... u........... . a....
""C;'V"O .0"
~-:8=a:1g='.;
.... 5:i ........0
... ~ 0 '0 > >>..
. .. ...... ....a "
.a.a CI>O..O".
~ ....... a.... ='..
..~~8 aa..:~~.
:i~tl=3g::a:
:~ ~~:: ~~nii::!
c s;l a............
i"O.~ ~ .~.....!
....u....>.................
::I CI". ....a .
ua.u .......
.a........>ClI....l
....."'~o.. CO::l
. ...Q.............
.... ::I"'. ...
.s;l""""llI.UUA"O
a.a ::It:l........
:.g~5~"Z:::Cl/l~:
u.... .>II u..... 100 .
;O"O.;.......c::Iol.c;....
:;E:"I:lI"o-iaCl.c::lU"I:lII
'"
N
..
.
~
~ ~
. .
>(:
..
.:l .
o.
.
. ,
AO
W...
W
..
00
~..
.~
. .
~ .
" 0
1[
"
.
.....
.~
o
.0
~o
.
:u
~
. ~
.~
o .
.0
.~
~
~.
~
u C ..
..= J
....0
""~
~
". 0
.:l.:l-
".. =
. .
o. .
..~~
1~ g
~o~
. 0 ~
.~~
" ...
.0
M" ~
~
:: .s
4) ~ E
~ ~ ~
] 6 oS
8 :~ '0
<II &. ?;l
~ U ::l
0.. 6.s
~ .s .g
'io "0 ]
'" Iii 0.
~ t: 0
::;) ~ c:
> 't ~
.. '" .
fl .5 ts
o 2 4)
4) ",'e'
-5 Q. 0.
U
;::
" "
..e ~
u '0
iH
-!! ~
'a 0
.~ ~
~ '
0. .g
U U
;:: ~
,.;
...
'"
11
."
u
Ii
11
;
...
"
Iii
..
" ...
..g ~
E ,
2 :3
..g E
. e
.s 2-
.s: '0
e .
0. U
~ '~
" "
Iii .
2: ~
... ,
" ~
!l,_
a. .S
6 "
; ~
e .5
;;: ""@
. ~
~ 0
d
.~ b ~
'D ~
::E 6 -!!
.:.i u '0
::a ~ r:
5..2 ~
.
~ .
i .. ~.. ~ c:: ~
:::~::'8
.. ...... .... 0
:r ~ 9 .. ~"'d '"
II .. 0.... 0
>O:l.-f ,.,~
a "Po ......
...., _4.0.....
."O.lIC III U ..
o II"" ::I
.. lot . ".... .. ..
.. G..::I.....c::l
...... ""...."C u 0.......
1.100 ",oa
c > .. 0'" >..a..
..... .au..:
... . . .. "" J" .... to> !!I
l~ E iii : ..:~ i ~ !
.!!>oU~!.5..-I=...:
l1li. 0 >0.....
;~z :e,;"''fi",,::I Ao
.. ::I.c.... ..>.a
t:~;-=,g~:~:1~
14 3c . ""! ... ~
.. 0::1 . >0..........
~ '0 .. o.
. ..,................ ...
.a . .... ::I OJ a.o OJ 0 .. U
.....a......o.. _u ..
.....Q"C.... "" _,.... '"
.... :s.. a.o.lllC Il::l
a:PoO.-4 :;~":Ii~
:: .... t :~ =- 1llo;:1 g 3 ~
Clllo.t......... :Ii '" . .. ::l
.... III Q o.a .0 A.
..-t.... .. a......-t.......
.Gg_.. ..-tv..
g"".......,e..................
H a.....u:a..... 0" ;:IQ"
"C:~1
. .
..0
"... .
~."
. .
o.~
~ ">
.~
~ .
~~
~..
~.B
/ L/ J) VI ~
.~ 4) l::
'" -5 0 ~ .~
g -5 ... U '0 ~ -
'S .~ .~ ~ E 0 .~
... ~ e .Q. 2:l ~ a
~.~~?;l""@~u
~ 0 <II g ~ :~ e
~;~~~e'b~
4l 0 <II .B ..... e l::
]:Ea.~~~-5
T35~.s~.~
e ~ u Q) OJ
~ .~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .~
g ~ ~ .~ K ;:; .g
~ g 'g ~ e .E ~
.:; ~ 4l .:i ~.8 fJ
::; al -S . gJ 0 <II
e ~ <'I:l "5 ts l:: al
~ 4) f:I .a : 'l:I ~
'> l:: 4) :::l "5 Q)
]e~~!t~o
.c C"( 8. " iij ts !::
u'<tE~u.~t75
.s~8u~e,o
tf~.~~~~~
... ] :-= >. -::i -s 9
I~~iqj
<.;;'a~M.8]~o.
..,; ~ ~ Q. 4l r--- 0
.~.Il~;t.~~
~""@e8~&g.3
~
...
.
.. V I I ~
c: ... c .. .. g
..... l1li '" ... ::I
c: ...-t:l 0
o ..............
1:1.. .. c: ...
D.~ ...
........ ..... ::I ..
p.~ ~... r~
~~~L~.:.::
.. .... ... ::I ...
....,.... . .
D.... ."0 Cl
.. IIIlA C >0 0
Go ".CZU
c: "l1li
~ l1li.... 4 .-I
~ oO:li....
.... '" u".....
..... ....;J
.. 'CI ::I tool ....
....... D "Cl
> . >. a
D Il . .......
oO...III..-t
.c u . ... _ ..
. ........
..Q a I "".tooI
... I .....101
~ ~~
::gJs5!
CZlal ........
.... .. 01 .
.coo.........
.... c.. > loll
... .....
H %. >....
.. ~:K,=:!.a
1::1.........""...
0....0....
....> >"'0
.... .. .-4...
.... .. . >...
...... . l1li .....
&'J:I ~ Iii:;:'
U. iii G
. ...c...
........:t.Clu..t....
.c 0 a... ::I a.....
"';...~..." tJ
........o...u
0"'" 0 .
..u..Q:~ t::-=
'5.Jl.~:::: c:;:
........~ 00....
..... ~..,.....
." .. c:; ...
c:; dO.... 0.... 0
.... ...... c: .. >....
~
.
.
.
~
~
.
c
o
.
c
.
.
..
"
g
e
'"
.
.
.
.
.
~
~
.
~
.
e
.
M
o
"
.
1
o
.
"
.
Z
.
o
..
o
"
~
,
o
"
.
~
o
~
~
...
~
o
~
"
'"
"
5
a
!j
u
E
~
o
8.
!!
E
J!
e
~
"
v
;;:
...
..,
~
.8
.
S
e
~
8
E
~
o
8.
!!
E
~
~
.
v
;;:
~
.s '"
:s
.
<9
,9
a
'0
5
.Ii
.~
Q,
;::
M
!l,
.
Q,
o
o
o
"'3
uv
u
::! :'0
. .
..~ ~
N
'"
"
i
u
E
~
o
8.
!!
E
.
<!!
e
~
.
.!l
0.
on
..,
N
~
~
~
'"
..,
E
.
u
.
.g
:;
e
"
8.
.
.
o
u
oa
'"
iil
'"
'"
e
Q
11
.
.,;
~
~
u
'€I
~
o
:ri'i
M ..g
~ ~
'" ~
~ ~
. .
!l, ~
~ 's
.
u
o
o
o
o
..,
~
.
.
~
..
H
..
"
.
..,
u
s
~~
tl ~ .5
9 6 ~
c a .~
'(; .5 9
[~g
g ~ ,;
.g ~ a
ti ; .8
:E ~ '0
:t Q.:i
.5 ~
.
o
.9 ("l .~
~ '60- -
.~ f-o
'E.. a E
.~ 8 e
Hg
~ ! j
.~ ~
E
9 13 ~
9 a ~
<<l:.:::l (,I
e '8 ]
c - w,
~ .~ t
8 e= .5 9
~ ~ ~ I
...
..,
,
.
.
o
~
.
o
.
o
~
.
.
~
~
.
~
.
.
~
e
"
a
~
<<
~
.
~
iil,
"
is
Iii
'"
'CI
'"
o
v
'€I
<;
.
'S:
,.
'€I
.Ii
o
u
8
.
!:.
<;
a
v
'€I
"0
Iii
'"
iil
v
'€I
.5
~ ~
o e
"i <<
.., '"
c
~ .~
Q, "
9 s:
. "0
<!! ,
e "
~ ~
"
o:~
-d <;
5 a
o .'"
E ~
E "
a .!l
8 ~
'"
..,
on
..,
"
"
o
"
'€I
.
v
.g>
v
..
o
Jl
u
"
..,
u
:a
~
~
"'
~
w
.
~
"
~
o
~
.
0-
..
..
" .
.3
V
o .
i'5
.~
~o
~
. 0
~...
o
....
.
~.
o .
. .
.. .
.
~
> .
O~
~ .
o .
.,.0
~
..
. .
~
....
o.
o .
~ 0
. ,
o .
...
~u
.~
....
.,.0
...
. .
. 0
~.
w.
. .
'"
..,
.
c
o
~ E
..
,.
..,
~
v
c
g
"
-8 v
9 -5
.!l
8
.
'"
u
c
!l,
<(
"0
3
~
o
" "a'
e
" ~
p ~
v
~~
u 0 :a
-5 ~ 9
.5 or::. "0
'€I ~ .;
.~ ~ ~
8 8. e-
'" 8 .-
Q,'ll
. . ~
~ -~ e
g .!:l Q,
c ~ ~
i u ~
o oS ";;:
u 'd e
'"
..
.
.
o.
. "
. .
. 0
o.
o
~
w.
~.
.
.~
o.
o .
..
. 0
" .
~.
o
~
p
~ .
V .
.~
. .
u.
. .
.w
uw
.
. .
W~
...
"
ow
.
.
. .
~.
.
w'
. .
.
....
v
~ ...
u.
U'~
.
.0
.
.~
w~
w.
.N
...
..,
"
u
c
!l,
<(
-g
~
.
o
.
~
..
,.0
..
.
.
.
.
.
v
~
.
.
.
.
o
"
..
~
~
o
~
...
~
~
.
. ..
'N
.~
v.
.
..u
.~
..,
;.ll
. .
~~
.
.
0..,
uu
.0
..0
h
~o
00
..,
'll
u
o
11
o
8
..,
.
"
.0
.E
'"
'u
.., oj
II
~ 8
p
~
:j -l
~ ~
'" i5
Ul .s
9 E
a "0
. v
~ '8
:g .
<I( ~
~ ~
u
E E
~ ~
e 8
~ Q,
~ ~
0:: .S
w
..
;;
"
.
0.
~
.
.
o
~
..
.
u
..
.
5
.
~
0.
.
.
~
S
.
.
.~
.~
u~
is
.., 0
.w
'N
; 0
. v
. 0
" .
v~
. .
. .
"~
-.
"
.
. . u
... .
. .
"'...
~~~
J~:
..~
.., . 0
..o~
~ .
w .
o~.
.
. . .
..~
~ .!l-
v.l;
..~
..0
H~
N.
.N.o
o . .
]....a
w.
."'~
...
0...
00 0
o.~
.
11
o
~
.
~
~
~
~
3
.
.
.
o
.0
U
o
o
,.0
]
~
u
U
o
~
'"
..,
'"
~
....
""
"j
.,;
:;;:
e
E
a
o
u
E
~
c
8.
!!
E
.
<!!
e
~
c
.!l
0.
"
o
.
C.
"
v '"
'€I 0
" e
.~ ~
t: .E
" .
-M a
9 'e
~;a
~l
<< ~
-g '0
~ It
!!
v
'€I
...
I
1
~
.
.
~
'€l
.0
U
:a
~
'"
iil
'"
]
Q
'll
,.
.,;
.~
u
~
v i
;: a
o '0
~ .~
M :E
!l,
.
Q,
E
.
<!!
e
~
c
v
;;:
~ '"
~ ~
Q, Q,
.5 .5
:a 11
o 0
" "
8. 8.
,.;
..,
..
..,
~
o
v
.
o
u
u
.
.
.
.
.
,.0
~
~
~
.
~
.
.0
~
.
o
.
.
.
~
.
. '.
. V
~w
. .
. u
. .
o
..
. .
""
~
O~
o .
.
.
.~
o.
. .
.
. .
u
...
o v
~ .
o .
~,.o
.
U~
~ .
o
H 0
0;:
u.
. .
00
~.
.!l :
"0 e
~ ~
~ '"
'a
-g .;;:;
~ .ll
"0
.,;
~
.
u
.
Q,
.5
.
d U
a ~
;:; .5
00
..,
.
.0
~
.
.
.
.
v
~
.
2
~
e.:!<Q
o~.
. .
~ . .
o ~ ~
. "'" 2
.o~ ~
u 0
0.'
.. A
~.:~
u 0
..v
~A
..........
.'04"e
a a . ...
. ..
u c. . =-
o~
>....t~ :II
~.....o
~. ~
-=:..:...
\1.......0
. . .
~ .0
O~ ..
. . "!;lI 0
~~~
* U :S lot
.. <II 0 .
.llIt:l.JtCl.
O~
~ v..
o .
'" ..a...
.c..... 100
~. .
~ ..~
~.A
0" t:l..
~.u
. Ie .......
..... . ....
. 0
>Jt"'.
.0"'.
....1:0:1
V 0
U~ ..,
~ ~J::
.. .. .. 0
=-.........0
JLjlr 5{)
.,
I
t'
.,
~.
""
.~
,
it
v
'€I
E
~-5
~ "3
~ -.;
g 8-
'3 8
. Q,
~
i
..,
,
J
,
"
1
I
'I
.
o
~
. ..
....
00
.
~.a
.~
...
.
~,.o
o
~ .
v,O
~ .
.A
. U
A~
. .
.
.
. .
"'~
.~
'"
..,
..,
..,
9
.
...
.
A
.
.
o
t
.
~
~
o
o
11
o
g:
o a
" .
o.
u.
o
u~
.0
.~
0..
00
0.
HO
o
~
~ .
~ _Ii
t~
~ 0.
..
..,
.
.::: :s
-d ~
" 0
g z:.
-0 S
'€I
~ [
8 g
..
...
..
..,
..
'"'"
""
1
...
~
~
.
"
v
.
0.
o
o
..
.:;
..
~
~
o
A
..
o
o
o
~
.
u
0.
~ !
~.; . .
10< 100 ..,.(0-1
0.. 1114 uo
u........ ......... u
U ::I.r:.... . ::l 100.... ..
.. . .........>C CI' U III
....1 ~o;t.:i;.3..= .~~
~J:fi .~:,...~~u
..~..........a{D.,.( A
::M.~-=gD"~~'=U
e.58::.'fi.t.~lt
~1~3.!:~"'~"'o~
:r......o-. ......
o-IG~.... ."U
OU...auu",'O'l: ."'IC
... .. 0 1-4 100... . > u ..
U '" .OO'O'lk'O'l....
= U II 8.... d =-8~t.0'0
.......0.....> .,1;1
.... 100 .. ;0..""'"
.IoO.u...........o.a
':f"-;:7.!:g;...=:t
......... 1oIC'4...... 0'=..,...
II III '" ........ c:: II
I. a III !XI >....... ..
:l:~w~;1'fi.5~lo~
w. "c:I~ 0100......
a,e-.:J . ....e uc...
.. ..., u'" 0........... "
. ..Q,C IoO.IoOC....
.cco.uu...Q~ 0
.... 0 Q,... U iii a to 'lI1 ~~
o . u u 0 *,..1 0 0 .
"'....s:l.tliI....._ CloO::l
J'i::Q,..-l.2:::53.t:l.:;
~g~ ..aCl..,.... ...
.........z:cp...o,C....
.. I" 'CII ......
o co 0" .... ..... .
o .............. III aGe.......
::.:2 .t;~~l:~~.:l.
~::f~~t~...~=...:'"(;!
O'O'lIO...,.....Cc:l ..
::10_ .'c>.i..~
....a z .... "" u.:a .a...u
C:.. Q......
'O'l. A......... 'ClIO.......
o......u.............'O
Cl.:'fi....eg;~t~;o...'5
ou OUA 0.......::1
.. .. ....o.....oa.......
.. . 00... .... .... t:l. ...
........a.o .. ...........
a 0 o.......a ~ 0... I:: .......... I:lo
..s.cu ........c"'" ..
:ac=~:H::U~~!~ft1!t:
.....,....d<O; lll!:,C"'u-c.
...
)
;
.
u
o
u
.
~
o
u
o
.
~
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
o
~
v
~
.
.
~
.
.
u
.
.
~
~
~
~
~
o
-=
~
=
.
.
.
.
.
"
..
.
u
~
.
.
o
a
..
..,
J
"!\
,,"
OlI!Ii
~
.
'"
~
w
o
.
u
~
.
...
j;
. .
...
. .
. .
~~
...~
~"
o
. .
uu
~..
~"
.~
. .
.A
o .
A~
.~
'"
-i
,.
...
~
'"
..
...
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,!
I
I
,d
I
,
:
I
I
I
I
I
I
N
~
~.
~.
"
....
U"
"
:::2:-
. .
.... ~
M
~ N
o " ';j
<" "8 .g
~ 'C ~
~ & '"
.~ aN
u -
u 6' ~
6 ~ ~
t;! ~ Ul
:> ~ '"
~ ~ :s
" '" '"
.c ~ a
u "
u u .8
-5 g <i
.c 00 g
(,) ~ u '"
:E Ui b ~
at U u ~
5 -5 1-0
J:l ~
~ ~ ~
.::l 5 gp
.g~~
'=D 0 U
.~ ~ .5
a .. ~
0. ~ 'a
] ~ 'g
..c ~ CJ
I..l ~ 'a
~ u ~
11 r: 5
"
.E
"
~
"
u
u
u
.~
"
u
1.
E
o
u
.
;;
e
~
u
"il .
I l
.~ a
~ 'J::
u .l!
i3 ~
'" 0
~::
o 0
b e
~ u
:3 &
~ ~
...
...
.~ .
~ 5 ; a .: ';
o 1.-4 'U 0
.= ... c:a.. U I,"",.r:;
...c a ~ .. c:........
.. ~ .. "00..-4 ..
o Q _c:; c: 0" 0
.a~P."" ,.CI
401 '1'4" .. "l;I
~ CloC OIl ...,11I.'0
: ~-::=.~"'.a:
os::... 0 c: 0
""'"... 00 0.. Po
o Co..... 0
...s......,a.....
""a..A.....p.
......... ...:s
..... 0 0 ......:s ..
au tl:H1 ~....~
:: I; "':~... o~
. .. ...... 0
.. .. .. .. lot.c ..
~~=~....;::
~... .t:::l :...~
0,1:1 004"U
II ... :t.a...
.... = ...~.a
ODD'" ... 0 0 ...
.. .. ;s .. .. t:I ...
.... PO III" g,....
.t-5g~':(.JQ
.. 1I.....c.. ... IIIl
003"''''80_
t:U.'Z"'~.:
~ ~,A~th~'e
. '1'4.... .. .. ..
'0'" CIoA III
I g . ...... . . u
... .. 0 0........
. u >.2:.... .. I
'U" A ...:::lI I
g..:"'I;I .)i J;::
"d ....:t:......
...a"'''G...::I
I .. 0 -.t ;S.... o.a
... P > 0 A
.-t o.c.. _
a....sw....>.a
0....... CIo.... ....
.::f Q........
~.o..a.o.a
P'" :it.. .-4
:J" ........ c ..
O...u...,A..O.....
....I:ll;~..,.'jl
... ::S'" u...
.a .....:21 >..::1.-4
...c ... 0.... lot....
O.....O.lJlc...;s
... lI< =- "".. Q ....D
"
~
u
"" .
" e
~. 8
~
u
~
.;
...
u
. ."
g~'8.... ~.
u 11III .. .JI.... . CI":
CI I':S.I*I t:t...
u 0 '-' '" ..... 1,1 III
..u~:"fi;:"!l
'j-=:i;:s..g"3~
..-.4....-I.<J.0I
.......~.a "
.... ~ -H 0" J :a Ii:.
0..1...."I:I..:s.
.. 8.~~ :...A II
Z..~=:J.x~
.g~;~~"''C1i:
0"'0......,j'"
.. ...... .. :S.cl
~::::~I:::g...
.r:;:J!i2.....,Z.Po
~A....I...:3
III OO:S '" :s a M
..~.~!~.
.. . ..
AA A_ "''''
.....~~~~...:::
....."':. au..
OJ:"'", =:S~~:j
.."Q..>. ....
~...~~:S~1~...
"':S3:~... 0
.0 . .... ..
Cllo..D .. :sA....a.
..uU'ua.. ""
'" .... ~ ~ u .. .. .
11:Io.........0'"'
a.o.... .~Cl
...>....... >-
,C.......... j:l ....-aA
...:s........"'......
u 3: tI :s C :s .
.....-1. ..DOOO"
.. as III .... u"
..c: g '" a "I:l "'... a
..o........c:lo......t
.... . . lIS '" . .. .
1:-5'"';.~~!~
.. "'.... .. '" ."
...uou...... ...~
gf>..aog~1.
.c ......a.o ....
.........a..:. '"
u..... OO:J. " ..."'d ..
...~....Qo..a.
........oS,.,J."I:l.a.=-
~
...
'"
\I
e
u
E
g
u
9
~
"
8-
11
9
"
,B
~
~
.
o
0:;
'"
...
. ..
~ "
L ii & !
~.!= ~
. .....
.........
. u .
...ad."
~.. 3 &0
.. .....t"'d .
".... :s u
c:::~.....~ .
.......-a..
II~ <ri a
Olllll..a~.
au. .
.....:s .
."0...
.2 &.. ... e "U
...... .. .. a
... .. .. 0 ..
.... > CIo......
. . 0."0
.."Q....:s....>.,
... . > ..
'fi >. ~ 0 2 =
..........0.00
.~ .
.... ..a"l:ll ....-a
....= . 0 .
.. III "I:l a..
....."".... .
III Do 0 > .. ..
a.. 0."
-== .. 01,1
A ;:l tIo"O ~
... ...........
..........
AII::......a....
"'O.-clIW"U
~~:
:... >....
:s.a....
='j.a.~J:I
:;:: ti::: :11
eu-;.a~'I:S
I:lo. ... ....
.... .::s
....~...o 0
.. ;::I.... :J
u." 0 a
alOl.a"'.....
..........u.
=~~tc-5
'O..D..Ds:lO
. ~.
~ f'.i.! =: t: ~
oug_-clI
".... ;;.
t;.g'"O.:~
M
"
E
u
E
E
o
u
9
~
"
8-
.
e
9
"
,B
e
~
.
u
0:;
....
...
e.:
~ 00
'4 ~~
\r:l
~.~~h
" . ~
U 00<0.:1
o ~
a 0," A
.... .~ .
ctII a_w
~/Ljf)~?/
...
...
,
...
...
.~
',Ii
....
-ci "'"
"
0
0
0 ,
"
~ "'!
8
;
~
...,
,
...
"'I
~ . "'!
~ . ..
Il . .... . ,
. .... ... g }
z ~.~ ~ ....
. " 0
0 t'8~~ I ..
0
~ .. .
3: ...... . '" ....
!1>4..... .",. . ....
w .....::1.1: 0.... .
~ o o.al O~ tie ..
" w
~. " ...'" ~
Ol e cO ..): tJIoO . ..
>..c~ .c", ....
en ." ~, c............ . .....""" t e
I: ~ · ttH:~ >. ..
> " IlIIlH'Q, " .
.., W ~ ;. "" 1.l . G ..c:..a . \' .. ...
~ . ~~ o~o "-
" " Ill. -0 III "0 " .;
0 ~ :z 5 .'" . " o 1.l . 0. '\."J
~ C~~.::I :..... l' . 4\
0 .., c. 0" .. .." ..
'" . 0" ~):.c 0
... ~ i ~~.. ..<1....0 .
........ "
.., .. .. ~> m ~ ...
... ...., u. c ". >. OQ
" . = "pI 101041041.1 0 '\-
U .. 0 . 0:"
" ;::; .. .c M> ::s l....~~ ......
U '" :I: " ~ ..~ U InCl.a.l., "'~
::: 0 !i! 1.l.c.... 0 ......,.s ;; ..
'" a: ". .~" ~O. ...
" ... ... ~ .... . )I . . ... 00
.. . ..... ;~-=:a 0 .... ..,
z 0: w ..,.....".,0 " .,'"
'" .. .....UGl<loJolC rtO.c~ . ..
0 .. W E.... c.... C ~J.l""G 0 ....~
en :; a: I:l "Qu......>, -.... '" 0 ".. ,~
i i ~~~~ >0" .... "'0
" Q .. .. 0.... .. u..
'" Z z '" .O~ . . .
I: ... .. IIIlI.UNCI . .
" 0 . .. ....~ 00. "!
'" ::II tl IlSct >0 ::s.r::::SM
... Z '" o......>c ,v+,o It
Z z .c.....""" ~ .coO
... M~ OO+J .c oS o DlOIS
Z Z 0 zo t:.. ....101 ~J:C::S
'" ... " M'" .~ .I:::l....c ........ 0
~ 0 ::i~ MOO'" 0... .." "
:; 0.. .. N Ill. >OM e 01-1..
:; ... .. .. "0 ;; ...~ "0 E-l" II 10 ...
"' 0 ....00... 0 ...~ ~
0 0 ~ 0.. M o. 0"" .....00
U w >..~ .... .. ......co... ~" .c
..... .. .. e...,... > 0 . '"
0 Q~~ .. ~'" ....0 0 u..c c
ii: ~ ~ ~ . CUI.fIt 0......
... - .. .... .... ,",0 ..0 ... .0 "
. o~i .. ~:ll:>fo 0", 0...." O'c., ..... tl'1IS "'"
~ p:;o.cm c'tS II"" ..... c.
. U')~<II( .... ~ D'" CI II II = ......,-i
. . ",0 alao::C> .. .c.: ........ .....+>>u
~ ~~d N 0.. 0 .. foe'O):LlO "'0
" EQ>O"':S . ~.o.......... "'..
< zr!; ~ " lID c::J..... ..... /5)-
" a: ~ ~ 0 :!E-i\OO '" 0 o O~ tr.... :"0. )4/1
~ III ~::e , M"'''' . . 0..... U. III 00..
. >~~ ., 100....0 '" Q 'OOIlllIolt,) 00," ..
" 080
~ ".~ 'I
. _0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
()
!.J.J
,
~,
I
I
I
.
I
I
[I
1]-:,.
, .,,.
~
I
I
.'"
Zo
Oz
0<
"'u
,,'Ii
~~
z'"
-:
<...
'"
...;:;;-
",oe
..."'Z
",,,,~
0"'0
0....'"
tIJ~tIJ
...;:;;0
<:0
ZUZ
0<<
;:1:;:;;
<<<
z=~
ot::~
e:l:<
"'-,.
-Z<
Qo..:
-
Z...Q
<<Z
",Q<
<
'"
'"
...
to
...
..1
,
~
'J
N
'"
'"
..
.
C
,
.,
o
... '"
..C
.G).en
-0.... E ::s
....> +l C-C
QI \"Q1U
Q:1lJ<<:l>
..... 0.< -
Id:JQI IS
L.cO.r+l
GO +JIG
.a Cl)l...''''
L.... C ::I >
<<:l 0.... 0
ell C U. cd
>.c _
'+ltUlO:J
(I)..............c
XOQ.C\lU
z
o
fi ~
o .
~8 ~ ~~
~~ ~a..;. .,
~~ ~~:~ ill f]
z_ ...::5:;.:. Ic~~J
g:l . .-. " t '
"';; 1I~~~ 10 ~ J hi hl1
"" a.....," {" r ~ ~ r l "
~g ~~~~ bl~1~hj1j
'0
.
'"
a:a:'t:J O:>,C L a CD en
...... c.... +l.... 0 1I),tJ.....
tutu Ill..........,..... 1.......1:;
.cO+l"'OQlu:I+l
+l'tJ-O:J \,,1:):1
....lZIcPQo..,oc+l
III UI L Cl U .c 0 II
........ <<I.. G:l 10 J:;
-0 > -o.c.... +l -0 +oJ
-0 f";;;+lO.,:lui": ~
3Q1g~5S~~ ~.
.s~ULCf) CJl'e:.:::3,!
.~ . :g~.~;:~ ~.~:e
+l Ql > +l +l CIl L II}
.~~';;. ~:cP~IOg.:
-00 <<I: a::J.a +I II L....
I .c C c.... C' " C.c
CD +l LOW ~ >. QI .. ~....
L <<l G.... +1'0 CO
I>> 0 +l+l+l .....::J E ..+l
-'=CO....llI...C........OlllO
+J L:C; ~,~'U g f3'~
o3c~'tl.~IJ..... of
+lCOfA+J0....IDGlCC.
=~1Il5~gQJ:c~~Q1
C 0)1:0.... 1l:It- c.Cl.l:
Oc.~L....,5 L~+J
a..... +l III Ql .c.::I L
II)Cu.c..c::.:ll:+J41Q.'tJQI
CD... cP+l+J 0 ell +l I ."
L ~ II) ~ ....S.8.;;;.:;.~ i
.~.... ~u..e CU 1. S ~ 1.
U).~ C ~"O~~~ E 1.~
....a.01.O~~~'DQJ:;l
1.Ex............ Oc.J:o
2.l~~'D;~~~Ill....X
~o II) GI 0.0 ..J:
QJQlCDII) OIl).3I1)C)O
......J:-g_~ ~ II) ~'D ~.~ ~
II) +J..... E.... Ql cP cP.....:JJ:. ....
.... .... U lI) >.:JJ:. 0. >.... .... 0.
.J: 0 C.... al III lI) 0.... III 0.
............O.......l lU E 0 C. <<I
.
>:
L
.
.
Q
.ff!
l~l~
!oj 'j'
,,,In
I B
11)j ~ ! j ,
H~j~ A ] ]
'" 0
:; :; ,
~ = IX
'~ ~ OJ
o ~ ..
- " c
'0 g u:
~ "
I ~ -5
'" ,g 9
u cd .5
.0..... ~
E ~ ~
>--. C I!::l
<5 g ~
" 0 ~
;S 0. >--.
_ E ~
.; 8 "3
] [ l
_ " 0
~ ~ ~
C C .-
.~ ~ ~
o " "
o c ~
.. ~ ~
C " .
,9 e X
" ~
z .5 ;
'0 ..:.: B
~..!:l
~ ~ ~
g .s -M
~ 8 ~
~ ~ ~
-
<
"GI'D e.... 1. >......... U) +.I.J:
Q).J: GI CI 0........ 0 0........ +.I
:3~~m aim .J:C10
U) .............s::. > lI) lI)~ Q..o
.... C .....~.... L.....
~~::l':i III +.II:::~ g': g'
c....~:;~:~:3+.1.:;;a::c
Oll)+I.liC eD.cP.!II)",L.
.... G:lI G:l os::. G:lW CI
+J.... I 11I0 E 0 0 +.I III L. ]:
lIS '0 0 +I U 'C..... L.
'DOOl~. 111-5'DGO
5lD.=OIt-~":.c 1l.=1t-
f1.OI~lI)O;::;:.~~""G
m'= ~3~:c]: 3-5~~ ~
.~ E'=~:; If 1II.~ G:l::l+J~
CGI.....CI)CSL.5E>'DOL.
.... > 8'0 c......... E III C~ cu
GOC.....41+JO.....Ctj
L.ClII+.les::..o.- ....
.... u........+J N 1II m .
..... C'- .... o.c C'D 41
.:1 lG'D::I 41 ~ c.Q.G1'i3 L.
1.CC'D+J IIS3:01ll"
o.~ lIS C III Cl) E' >. a: L.'D
Q.+.Imllls::.>o..... enoc
en III c: c+J ~ 0.::1 elll
azi.~~'C::~g80
C 1II O+J 1II..... 41 ~.... L. c: +J
.~5 L..~::: ~~,:;:........ C
~ tgGl:': U)g-gzt.c:
zs::. II) <<Ill! 'C.... > o~
+J lI) II) s::. C . CD .... 'D u....
&'it:+J.~~.~:: BS 0 ~
.~c8..~~~:5~~,g~;
0.~lI)x:c5c:1II5GlII):3s::.
C lI) u~ L..... es::. lllll)+J Q. UJ
: ~'Q.Gl ~Q) ~+J.8 5 ~~;
Q) ~ ~ ~ E ~ g~ QJ g.:QI+-':::
s::..........+J s::.L.....s::.QJ:3....Ql
....'COUJ I +-' D. X+-l L. lI) 0....
..
c
.
'0
.
,
u
r
.
.
''''.. r
(<~) ~
~. ,.,,,,.' ~
1
,
1
;5
<
-
<
~
~i H~
J~ H~
Jifl/53
2
.:
~
"
i
1'1
~
~
~
~
:3
~
~
~
~ i~
-:: J ~ j
!o - 1:" ~
~ Jnh
I' ..!Oo$..;,.o;_
C!
~
~
""
...
~
...,
.
"
~
,
...,
f
iJi
4:
~ "\
c
8. .
~
9
- '""!
.!l
e
~
~
u
0:
~
N
<
...
'i
,
~
~
~f
J
~
.
!
"
I
I
,,,",,
AI ~.& &S" I l!
~!l lit fijfIJt Iliff un
t st! !!!~i 111.1 A~II
'I r~l h~f~!llt Jlflf! ~!i!f
1 5 a 1.1! t I 8.1 Ij'8
Il. IlJ .. - .. Jf 8" 911
~fU &~l !n~fIJ~ 11jflJ 'IU
!-"h I}!U 1)4 I ~ ~f
ill III fliil)l }1111 ]jtl
i Ii: III ;~ii&fsIJ ifl!!f ~It~f d i
l~ !!! '8"~ ~t~~.of ~ PI td II it
lig iJ~ HI raR~til g ~Iji tfii i n
! jfij A ill Iii, IJiiltt Ilifff rt:i f~~~ !~
! !!i! ! ~!j 51!' ~~!j~ J ~lif!1 ~~11 ~~J e
~' /'-1/1',51
to 4
""
iJ
...
,
""!
r~
....,ii
~
.
,...
if
1 :
~ '
t..
..
,
"
"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
C
.:
o
il
~
ii
I?
~
a
"
,;
~
Ii
.
L.",
"
E
'.
~
~
.'
i
;',
o
o
i
.2
I
dl~
J!"--
~ 6.!t~
~ :;;~:za6
::! ~.~ ~l~
.;- ] ll~~l>
.. a.:iw_JI
..(
M
.
R
"
e
9
-
~
e
u
~
u
;;;
..,
..\
.;.. '" ~ii 8 5 b ll.
i AO '5.8~ iJ_ S if
B! !H~.; l~~ lu~ l'J~iH
~.s f;j~: r.):I .a.:~.f ~: tB-
I'll U' ej'"':i '0';1, '~~l'. fi!.~ ~11
i ~J:II'J: r.. ~ j lilli-[
.~ E~.~.- -!j! !;- I ih'!ii...
U fr~~i !f-.:I ilJje n~lifj
.s oli2.lIf '~ifi j. -'!l-lll~!i
~o ~ i~~ i;~ ~I~ s.! ~i~
g'; u ll. J!; .; li P. 0 _ f
H~ l-h!g.r ii!;;1 jlt~ ~h~H
r~ f;HiI~ If~j Jl~8 lli~!i-
~f.1 !!:iii .j~1 .!~l .::r!.;!1~
jj~ t~~~~~ 19:1:~ UEol-<:li
jU Je~;.r~ ~~I! :e~;;1l ut~~i~1
:i >-'c.5e~ l' ~. :a''5S .....~
h~ ~;e"l!J:~'; 1~8j !ill1,g'f~ :g~~~!.
.e.. -..g'l;:rll "it. -"~.,, ;X9..."'.
~~~ 'H8~ ~ .~~8 v.~ef ~~~l .~~
sf t:; ~ i g ~.~ g U _c~.. 8fi: .1': ~~'~~'8
~ gN~ i~~~f~ ~!ji 1~~~j ~~~j~lll~
z Coes'" o-o.s"l:ll~ s::s-8 8~'5"lI.C1,a ~s'U5
:l! :fg,~ liiilf.' ~~fMllfS~! ~l~..l!gh
~--5 .8;:;)c::l e.!l. Ii i Ii .., B :s.~
A !~~ ~~gj. j ~!~8 2g~! 3BltiBlr
~
~li:
'-
~~
~.
9~
::;0
"-
.."!l
Ej
~.g
!E:?~
-?!:::a
.!lI..:.-8
2;;; E
.::!"'c
",,"'-
.- .
}::s
:.=-S
!!ri~
'ILl
:::1;
H..:'I-=
;n~
"gu
~.u
oil.
5[
":0
~~I
,,~
,~
~
~1
"
~ jL(fI~~5'
6.
I :.l
ii
I"
~
r;
.,;
"
,...,
i:
,.;:
~
,-,
Ii<
~
~.
~
.:
d!
H1
.....;
.S.g 0"
c-f
~~
l~j
5'~!
"1-'"
,!loll
'O~i
lti
g~J
~~
J~~~
00---
;;g:o.fj
g~Ji6
";:J!II~O
~H;
~?n
~
.....
-
""
"'"
'J;
...
J
',j>
"
;;
.,
J
"'"
.,
,
..,
I
"""'
,
"\
"
.,
..,
/
-,
""lJ
11
"
~ ~ll d
~ -:'i II ~i
I djJ a
.
.,
l
j
~
\D
"'l
j
JI!/} /5~
""
I
.~
I
I
I
I '"
"'
"'
""
u
I '"
'"
.,
"'
'-
c
I ""
0
z
"'
C
u
I 0
"
'"
Q
z
I .,
'"
"'
'"
'"
I !:
'"
""
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0 ~ :E 1!!
oS 0
~ .. t 8
" ~ "
~ g
.!l S
2 . '"
0 !l
0 8 ~ .
oS . .c 'g
~ .s ~
" . 0
.. ~ .8 8
.~ Q,
:S >. . -;:
E . 0
8 oS ~
:E ~ ::>
. !l '0
;;; 0 . 0
0 oS .. oS
S .u -" S
. " '"
'" 0 0 "' '"
"' 8 " ~
oS 0
0 . :;: -" .g
oS -
~ 0 e !l
" :5 '" 0 .8
0 :E
~ 0 "' '"
oS "5
~ <: -11 "
0 " e -Iii
Q, 0 0 .5
0 ~ !l
oS 0 ~ ~
oS
" 0 ~ .
. Q, " 0 0
~ 0 1'l oS 8
oS ~
'" .0 . ~
.8 "
,; -g ~
0 ..;
0 .~ . .
0 ;:: " g
. N
~ .0 ~
E ~ .0 !l
0 ~ ~ .5
5 . l
8 ~
8 0
s .- s
~
,
"'
~
iLi ", .... ~ CP 0 1-1 ~l: Gl +l 'tl l::
'" ...> ra ~ +l 't:I QI ~ I'llC..-l
U ? N .0 :fjJJ >. . e~ :s ra Gl
-"'"
W '" ... . . ~ +l'tS.,.j ~. '0
r.rfJ: '< I '" ...... ..-fGlg. t,Hlllllra
Q' 0 c. t "::~CIlg~m~'+04
..
~ . I 0'" 08.g'0~=-a~1ll>.
'" "
0_ ... 0.0 .,.j Ill...-l Q):J"",
:s !~~~= '" alNCU'""'Ul IllUl al
!:! ". ,.. J::>.QlQlJ-IEl+ls:
.... .= .....'""' ~.Q"'" Jj~.,.j
c."
U t:~ j:.< t " > .c:~.j.J~IIl+l'W""'.Q~
"'~U..l ".
~~lll~~ 0 "" . +lllln:lQlrGOO 0
r.r. 0. o . c:,.d>~c m:S).j
r.r. u~g=~ . a.o~ ..... +l QI '""' l1J~......
i' .- '" g<+JCP o C ClI ,=,"",'8 Q):J ~
~ "'CQ~Ill~
o<~ :.< " GlIII e '$f....GI~,g....~Ul..d :;
~ 8- :<:i <d"" u
. c: 't:l.Q+lUl~+JC+J - "
. 0 Ii' ti~o -;; "'3;S ~e D.n:l~ III is 5 ~
r.. _0 ~~~:c~8
,,- ~~..
" ~~~il~~ ... "...", +J.j.I o::J"" OJ t:F\!llolJ 8
o .~~_ N .u. r:: Ul..... o.....c: c 0 <<l.,.j .- '"
.. ... o CLl J.4 ;,..-+H.......-4 U+l i'l:t; ....
=.- - .. '&::lllj
.J CfJ C r-- ~~~~~i ... . o g.t:lQ El ~ D.~-.-+ i:i: HIS
-~..s "T ~ . . 0 +J Ql G 00'0 ~ 't:I 8;> ~
~ ~._l""I . 0.... o Ql,.. +l.cl CD '"'" rn C
U =e;:! >-~=8Sl~ M ~ ClZl'd s::;I-lQlJ::+l+lco::lg " "
Z'" - ~~~~.- . ....... -- ;>..a"3 '+o4.:J GI -~ :;~CfJ
U o~ ...
ffi~8)H~ . .- > 0 . ':::1ll't:ll1.0111~~,",~ . u _
~ '5.!fe " ... ... . :Ii o a.-l '"' 1tI -;; 1::! e
o ~'" g:g~~~Q " '" ~ "'... :;:1 =' O+l~,",'H >+1 ~~~
I
U <::); XAC ",:i~ ... .. ...... . III III 0 +I '"' H....-l c: ""' . >
... o~'" .. u> o~~-<!1ll0Ill..-l0 -' " .
:::'" -~
:g9mi::~~ .. ... -. . .,-4 C III CIl ~ GI '" "
0 ACO ~o!!! 0 j -gg..c: 'g..-l CIl+llQ'd CIl 8-g CIl ::;
~." e ..... ... .u" ltI..-I C III Ul ltI C
" 0.. 0 ..-1,",+1-,-4 1:: CIl H co.
~~~n gj>< ." N ." . GlE-i:;:~+I "" ='~ 8'
r.1 ...;! "c .. i; &IIJ
... a ..-I lQ 0 III '"' >0..-1
.... .. _,-4 a::t ...'" '." g_~+I ~ CIl g.~ :a+l~~
~ ~;~~~ 8'" >t~<j 0." ." " a.~ H &'"'+1 Q1~-1IJ
~~ 0... ;; .00
. . > 0'" '" 0. co ~ 'H e QI cog > Ull-l
~ ~h '0.-10.< .. '" ... Ql':: ~ ..-1.-18'.-1 ..c:..-I..c:~ +I
~u ...t::tCll III "... .
G..c:ot+l '" . . Q)O..-l GI",+I III H
% ~~ "'U . ...... lIl(f.loi::l l-l ..... >.-1..... Q) G >0..-1..-1
r.r. '" ~ . " ,; . . Q) GlltI Ill::t ltI C > CIl Ql
<<l'H c::t:> U ..... .t:\J:: 0 l-l OJ:: 0 <<lJ::.....J::
l-l 0..-1 0 '" ",,0 E-t....."'+I:J+lN..c:.......-i+l
.. . .... ,,'"
~o '" "'. ... " ~ JLj!} -07
l-l.....Ill\D::l . ~
",::I lIl..-l..-lr-J:: . . .... ..;
CQUP-oNU '" 0 o . ..
'"
""'
j
. ~ ~ ~ " u , ,
.,. .~ ~ u .~ . g '6. .s 'S
c " oS '5 :S 9 c u E ~
.g c .- ~ . ~ ~ ~ .9 ef "" u "'!
'. , 8 "" u ~ >. u >. ];I u
. u u is u i5 11
~ '3 ~ oS E . > M i! 'S "' c oS ""
u " 'a.;a ~ ~ u ;; ~
~ c .li . .5 '. . ~ 11 ! ~ c
, Jl ." ." E .~
'. u .~ '5 ~ c y 0 '. "
. 5 ~ !l 0 ~ ~ ~ Jl >. ~ '" "1 E . :c
" . ~ u "' '. c u e N 'C C
oS .ll 0 u ;; . '" ~ u " . oS " U 0. 0. """
:0 u . ~ ~ 0. ~ e
~ 8 ;'.~ " c . " . ~ -; ~ c ~ 0. C oS u
~ ~ .~ .9 . g u 0 c . . " [t -=
~ c ;; 1l . .~ ... ~ ;;
c c '2 ~ M '" " .!l IE . j
u .9 g '" -g u is .~ u '" u . . u ;;
c S c c c
9 ;; :s S u ] oS ~ '" ~ w , ~ :c ii 0 ~ oS -=
.~ 1l -1! . '" E ~ c u " ;; E " . u
'. ~ 5 0 0 ~ " "" c "
c W u S . " " M ~ -
~ >. i:;- 8 0 Jl ~ u . E c E u c
~ ~ ~ '" ~ u oS :s " Cl q :!: 'i3 0 '6. . .
~ ] ~ '" .a c u .ll
. " '. c u u .g u 8
u ;; ~ g 0 , !l, 0 <f oS s ~ u . .;: u ti
.g ? c c
E u " 0 . ;,. c ;:i .S ~ oS '" .g
c ~ c ~ . >. ~ it ~ 0 .S " 9 u .,. ;;
0 c c 0 ~ u " ,; .;: ~ " c N S .g c u
'0 0 ] u oS c is '0 9 ~ . .s " .g -= . >. "'!
. u . ~ 'i3 u e ~ u .ll . u u -d . c
" .S ~ ~ u u c -= '8 " .ll .
'0 " ~ c .. 8 :3 c " ~ .~ is c ;; ,
c ~ N U e " > ~ . 0 'i3 u 1
'5 '. " u ~ e ~ c 0. 11 '"
~ u '" E . ;; . c "" >. ,
" -1! E c 0. 'i3 u . u f- .E
. S oS g c. is ~ " c s
:s -; " 11 8 3 u s = . . ~ ~ 0
u S ~ . ~ ~ >. 9 ] c ~ u 'C
~ u -a. c 0 ~ E 'E c ~ c u . c u ~ 0.
0 oS .... 0 ~ 0 u u . ~ '" ..,
.~ N 0 'S .e ~ ~ '0 E . ~ "" . ~ c ~
0 . c c .g . '0 c e . c c
u . '. ... c . u c ~ u ~ = u e , ~ .
~ '" ~ E .9 ;; c '" 0 -= c ""
.s e ~ .S ~ .~ 'i3 9 "" " 0 0 ,~
g .a .~ '0 u u u
u 9 u ~ " . :s 0 'u < " " If . . .q .
c IE , c 5 :0 = 'u c '" " oS .~
F' u oS " " u u u u c 0 "" ~ .~ 0 '" ~ E
.S ~ 0; ~ c 0 ] "" E
:c E IE c E ~ E u g c -d
0 E 8 . 1i M S , 1i 1i '0 ~ ...
i . .g ~ g 'S " "" u U 0.
Jl ;; " >. ~ c S is E 'u 0 0 c "" ~
u -= " 9 u ~ '0 ~ , c ~ c c .~ 0 ;; c 0 0 "
fi: .~ ~ g . M !! N C C "" C C C C 0.
U " M ~ .~ . 8 0 0 0 is ;; !l "' 0 0 '0 c
0 '. fj 0 c .g- o '" g :s ::> . '0 u u " c
8- .,; E ~ '0 c u u .~
u ,ij c '. u W '" 5 u :s E E u "" 3 c E E '0
E ~ M . u > ~ -= . ~ ~ 'S '" '0 g
e u > E E ~ E E
E " 11 ~ ] e . , e u u W 'f! u "'!
2 ~ . '" :s -= ~. :'5 8 8 11 "" 8 8 ;:;
8 u u ~ ~ 0. U 0. 0. f- f-
0:: 0. F' .ll '. '" "
oS oS 'i3 Cl . ::0
...
0 ... u 0 ":' '! ~ ~ r;-
"! "! N ":'
= = = = =
= = = =
Ill\I
.,
lIS Gill+! IIJ.-I al 4J I +III: C G1"OHII GI.d., Gl Gl I: ... ~ Z g ,..;"'2 ~ g . ...c'tf+l\i.l
.c:......lll "'.d.dM ll:I cP...... z.s.a ~.~~:5:5~ C.Q ... <"-''''011:: C 0
e+J.j.):5~~+l.jJGl:5~1O . ....<<lllllll..-i . .
J.4ii+izra.oQl +l t" 1011I +I .-I '" J.411l l-It7I
t:Jl1-I +l s..... l-I :J J..l .... III .... 0.. >- ... al +i ../..I C
::.s ~OIgeo&:o:J O..,.j g 'W Ql.Q 4l"~ 0.... I 0 +J >''0.0 I ~1lIQ)::f""" ....
",'
+J ........s J..I'W >....... J..l I:: Ql ........ ,.cOo .......... .0 1"1 Ql Ql~ C n +J 01 U J..I
.-I'tf ....+l......~O.-l ...i t:Jle.-l.-lIll'O ::fUll'll :::J
~~t';:lDi ~1j.j6= s ....al...........c~:l'W104 . c . ..
Qllll c....... Ql 't:ll-lGlo
t......ot~....8'~tU<<lQ Bt:~:I~c,ge: ~~ i&.B g g~13 '" f; ~fi e
~ no ~...,j' 0 a
e~ III lIS u~.c: ~> CD'g.... 'tI]). CD CD Ill] 0 ..... no5~ no.... Ill;:: .0 ..
~ +JQJ U~QJ.c:QJ~ .... Ulltu""ftl: .. c.-t go III ~ no c =.; B ~: .,
oQlIlt.c:Ilt'Ogno~""=o 6&~;~5~ g .. o noO.d 0 ~ 0 III Ilt m 1-1
U~.d"" ....Ilt ". ~1Il""+J!:lu IOlGl....,1-I
~:S"" >;6.-t QI 6 8'3 Gl ';I:~~o~= ,'Zl . I-II-ICIl>o
. 1Q+J1Il'g~~~ ~ ,'ii
: I: g.-t :J ~ fi ),'001 CIl g o lIS...., at" 1-1'0 lIS ~.. " ggg~5
Ln), I-I.d ...,j QJ U ~~ 1-I>olll'Gl QJ " .
~QJO ~U1" ....,:1-1., 7'::1Il ~"" ~g.!:l;:. "A QJ g ~ QJ .0 ....
IIOlQlgl:~~.3HE'O~ f"l > g ~ ~~ QI g...! +J I ~ ....ooQl..Q ~~ ~=~.3~ ....
f"l" >...,j o).+J .....001 ~.... 'g g-u""V'O ~e" >0
QI """'Zl 0 QI, U 6't1 QI'Zl:;:: ~ ~ QI~~ "
tJlm.c: u.. I-I",,:s~ e); .. I;IllGle~ .... cc "" 0 QI "" .
lG".-t;::'O~..coa~...,j g tJlUu.....-lo.~c ",. cu,B no u.... 6 . ...,j'00I ~~...,j
., 1d...,j1lS IllM,d cu+l ." ~" IOl""QI,Q1-I
no ....""oa 0 CD Ilt QlI!!I notJI~" S 1;"" QI ~ ~ '" . 1-1 e oa at 0 0 Il-f ~'1'J G.~
tJI...,j tlI< '.-t IOl >o3:..a ." :s og:l f: 0....
S!;);f ~~~I-I~ ~ cC~~..,.j.,s.-t~g,J! g>B ." o~ "'.:: ~
o~ QJ .,s'::v:"" g :u.-to CUQll/) .0
"~8'Ill00 E~::J g vi S " QI cu :J g ~ g'~ ..- ...c. ""I
f"l"~""'tI ....,OQlI-I ~'g.2 . " ~s.~~~
1-1.8" QlIl-f 0 3.001 ~ G G- ~'O at c: I-I:s flIl-1~CDIl-f+JS"" "
~l1Q1;<g:lQJ~.3 ".c IV 3: III .,s'.-4 c. Oeo+J ..a
QJ eG"" ....no Il-f::. . . SCIIC SC't1:;: 3;:a ~ G B
~ c'~ ~ g!;~~g~ e~ 1 ,U S.d:s cu ~ ='0 o.
..-4 ::..~ ...-4 QI QI U ~,Q ~+Jt;ge
EO 1:: ~~ l/) ~ QlIO oa ..... 'tl ~.soa iii 0 .+I.8ii "C +J +ll/){/J>.-tl!l
c ..a ~~ .Q III II 0 CIl eft 1Il..-l"" c:"" l/) C "'. ~.d U ""..-4..-4,.Q.... ." c: Q1~ g. ..,
. 0 C c: 0 0 ..a tJI."..3 ~ +J lG +J "'....
e.~~ 0 ~~oafi:5"".~ cuo >Q1ltJlU~QlO ."" "'0 '001 ~..... ~
~~ltJ''''=CD= ~"" " "'. +J:SI-I."j""..-ll-l:s "0
:s+J no+J >OI5l.d.... C g. . Ii tJle i.8~~no~~,g ..... ... ..
m U ~ .... +J:S I!!I G 0 10 =o~ f!::e'2lO~ s. S:8E=~ "'
lU..a 1;""0 00111-1 QI 1-1 .c" +J QI noo QI..-4""
QlI-I.-t 0 lUo~::' I-Illl..... "" CIl Ql= 'dB:s g.::s ~=..a .... . .....-t""flIc:taltJ..,.j ~'g /tie....
151"" 0...-1 U 10 0..... ). a.d S :lllcu8taQlS);
III ""..a no c: Ql 0 -5 BQlBQJ"'~ . . at CIl). U lU .
c:eQl"'''''~QI.Q1;::"",.Q1-I c:...."""" "" 1-1 C c.o IH ",,'P co...-+:5 0 ~ " ;II;J~.8g~ "'"
o ,d tJlQI 0 III c: 0"" c: c: oa oa 0:5 0'" " ,
.". +1'001"" -=""..a'>GtJlll-f ..-l....Q1Q1Q1mQlc.... ..."" o c: '" cu >00 OC ~.d c ..-l..,
"... -:;:~+J.::gg.....d.-l g~o ~;t=~~lG~..-l~g ....... 1llJ.l J.l ""+J ~:J ....tJIQ1 ""Ill
..... ~.dt ~""QlQlQI.3""1O ';d5~.3:S <'
... ~:S g .:s ~ G g t 6 tI = t; .~.c1 f~"'~..-l cuS.EI "J.l.d.-t.d QI"" . "
"'... ..e."e"e.... ...."".001 0"" no..... nou 0 J.l.c: U J.l Gl
"" J.l no"" c: ::s III >0 III 0 0 .. " PoQJO CII0Ql '" CIl"" QJ c: U)ol
. ..-l:S 151 0 1Il..-l c: lIS"" .". J.l J.l .... Po 0 ::s CII c: QI llf..! C "'0" GlIOl.c:QJIII:SJ.lP. .. ~';.1:Bl!e~
J.lf"l"C'\I ::E:........c:..,.j.O.....~'OU'l-t ":11: +1100 nop Po 100 I!!I O. "'... 3..-l); p...,'t! Po III ..... "'"
. I .~__
.Q.. "" I
~3~ 0 "' '" ....
0 .. u .., " ,
N N N .., " " " ,
"'''''' ... " " " ~ " ~ " ~
)'IIj~fct
Ill\I
j
;1-
I
I
I
'" >> u u .S a ~ ~
e g -s -s ~
., u
Q 5 .E 0 .~ ~
-1l ';;' 0 .'" 9
u a E
B i! ~ .!I
'5 c ~ . 1! ~
c ~ u ~ ~
:!? u >> !i
~ .~ 'ia .8
~ ... ..d u.
ll, ;; s c c 0
0 u .S c .
~ u >> " 0 0 .S
'" ., c u 0 5 '.
0 0 ~ u 9 ;;
0 '5 0 "' " ~
S .8 -s 0 ;;
;;;; u
.8 0 5 0
S ~ 0 ~
~ >> . 5 5 .,
~
~ ~ " . 0 0
~ 0 5 5 u :c
~ ... c ~ .g ~ '"
s '" . ~
0 " u e " u u
0 ~
.9 u 0 ~ '" ~ ~ -s
-s ~ c
;; . ~ ., u '" oi
.~ 9 >> 0 c ~ Ui
~ '5
~ ~ 1l ~ c "'
c c ~ S ]
9 u ;; c '. Tl
.~ 0 ". 0 Q
~ '" u u " c
'" c ,.; ~ u a 8 u
~ ~ .. -s
~ :2 -B ~
~ u 1l 'E ;; e 0
~ u u u u u u
u -s 0 5 is 0 ~
0: " " M
. ~ - .,
0 -1l ll,
,; -g ] u ,; '0
" -s " .;; ~
. ,9 '"
0 0 ~ >> ~ 0 " s
0 0 ~ "' 0
0 0 u " 9 ~ u
:c 0 . 0 u 11 e
u u ~ ~ ~ u ~
5 5 8- 5 0 '" ~ c
~ 5 '" 0 ~ .!I ~ ~ c 0
~ u
8 Ui 0 N -s .8 ~ u
'" 0 on ~ ~ '6 -5
'? '" =
~
, .
.. .. ..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
. GlIIl:: ,Ql-IJ-IJ4JQl .t:Il.... C Ql QI'tJ >0 . Gt tIl.a.J ell . GI't1 CI) 0'1111" t:Il . .
N C.= > 0 C N lJollllll.s:::U C III Ofi:S~~:.QlII';;~:S~ .s::: 1-!.jJ C II C r::: . ..
" ~+l~G1gU:B:S:S.jJ~~5 .jJ1lI::!.....jJIll.... . 0
'tJ i> k.... 1Jo).... .... tIIl:UQI .c: . "
.., .f.J k:S U1lt1 C '" ......... lUOltlllllg':s.... O'l1'tJ+J I: QI.... c.... ..loll " "
C 1lI0....klUmOGl't1COIll+J c c r:: O.....jJ.... QI.... ....kli!lU.c:+I.... 0. ~~.
. u.>o:s.....ooc....t kill --;;;-;;1:::a 0) C.; Ql~~ r;o~~~'l1 . C.
.... III >c 0 .d ::l Q) J.4 QI.... Ql ..
" ~~ QJ 0 g'+l:'g 9.gp Gl t +l::l ::l.jJ~Gl.c....>ofi 0l.jJ ...... M 0 k C U
" C "0 [).... .... U ~lUI'llU~UO C ~'"
;E:;;~-;:'''''''':S k 8+J ..:S e oft c lW:S...t .Q tJI+llII . '"
. >........ tJlCo'+-l-l-i ~
.g, .... trll-i....ii 0 o. III >0 oalll ..c:::lII .... ~o
IlIC.....k-tQJ'g.a.Jk.cllll.....k _ ~ ~>.ti III ):5'8';; iii 8' ~~O';;~Ou 0 0."
. .51l1'tl~=~.jJ ..llIt;;:d .8 III ~ 1::.... t:Il:1 0.
" :;j2111+J......!o:k'tl'tl.....'SOQl . iN02
'" C+J+JGcgllSllIQ)!::C:S .c: .......cg.....kgIII 1Il'tJ+ltll : ~o.s Iii .
. GllllIllEil.s:::.....r::.jJIIlOtf.l:+J ..'+-l~ k Ql..d.... "
" ~'tJ.&~-tJafA31-1:;::"d::lO -:;;~8.kOg......-4~k~;j " o .0
. ~.QO~+J "'-:;;+J"E-SI:: I::SI::+J'figQl 0 o Co
0. l1t.... t1OftotlooUl=o'fi 0..-4 :::l > U >, ;0
C J.d5o~.:l2 ~~~.a+J.... +J .=og~ ~t1Ot....o ;1..," ~>O.~ . >0 0
..-400 S +J I:: .... IIlQl.a+J.Q.-l"" " "",
0 .8);e-: ~......,.... g'>;U1); :a:' ~ QI.... ~ .... QI C (II ~" ~ ~ ~~.~~
~ Ql~'8 at '8 8- II
~ ..., (II . ~::l ..., >,,::; lD""" .-l~~og:::o .'5:.~~
. ~);O 0"': g~.... c'8$: . '"
~o'" ~cu =;jt:;j ~ U1.c 0.... (II III 1Il '" U . '"
'" ..t1OQI aI k Do-=: >.0;:1..... ~ " " "
~ aJ~.:l e ~1Il.~ 2~-Z-:;; ~ III ..., ~Q ~ g C~ 0 Q Qll!)::: 0~9 ::lQl+J ~ ~ ..
~ oOO....Qlll'lc .., '" "'"
~ ~ I ...,::::l~t1O ...,-=:lIltQl!)..., ='004:5 0..., t1OiO s.c~..... ~ogo.Q'~~ "
" tI~ :S 0 ~ 1O'~"",c); .
" ..-41"1]8 .:l~i02.~..~1Il O.Q.... :S '" ..-4 Do.... ","" III k...,,,, ~'oo4 '"
""'I;t..-+ (I),c""QI""...,>OtllZ lD..-4oa1::..-1 QI.... .
~ I:: l::::,c 0-", II! =.Q tIl..-l Ill::l Pot.oo4o ;~:S 0..-10 ....C.-lQ):l~~ "
k.d UI : (II '" ::::l QI
>0 Ql <<J 2.:l 1::;;:: Z oa QI a a: 'ti QI Ql e ~ +J tJ'l,c.... ~ III 0"S :S~g~8tJ'l~ .
1::0 DoC III 'oo4.-l $.l.... Ql)4 $.l "
" :S Dogoa Illl::::~ 0 QI ~);.Lt ... :J g oa C III 0
0 ~7 C.;;; lIl'4-lb g,S.::l.a QI '" o ,c..-l 1Il.....l:::: c:OU :::l 0. "'UQI QI 0..-4 ~
" tnO$.l~oQl,cQl+lQlQl~ ;;:: ::l t'5 IU 0 lri QI 0 III ~-;:: :J 0..-4 '5 rei "
.
0 QlU!:;::""'OlIIoalll~g3:> I 0 g.oo4 C ...-4 c: > >..... 8:~ .. 0 ~ ~ Ql . .
> III Ql III . ~ ~...,~,c... c.:g..., :sn~ c~""~8~>''fi So"
. ::l Ql ~ 0 a. k >
" Ql g''8 ~ .s 0 c m"" 8. 0 ~ QI ..-=:.... .... ::lIU 1Il.Lt..-lQlQl+J.:g >o~
:S OoQl~ lIlIU B): Ql -=:~ liiiI t1O"" C 0 CII &lD...."'...,
C ..", ego..., ~ cu'oo4 ~ CII ~ .Lt trl,c S III CU
~ ~ . (I) ..-4 $.l QI 0 ~ g e""'Z g.= .$
0 o c 0 ~....IlS-,c U1l::ou ,?j"0'.... 10..., reI:S $.l >,m,c Do ."
. ",,08m.,) ..-IlIl:...,:....-= ..-I.........cO 1ll""1'I ~,c 8'~ III f:;:: >0
"~ oaoa cu,c >0= 6.>0 +llll::::: '" 1Il 0 to reI.Q Ill", C .... .u
." $.l ~ $.l""~ O'oo4~ . g.tJ\): .. c: III 0 .. lll"-l k 0.004....'.3 "'0
"'N , ~'oo4'O"" III S III +l'" C Ill' .~ g.:s ~;;::.s t~'5 Co:: fla.~ cEo< ~ ~ o~
...~ .~
.~ " QI III c: 0 III QI QI 0 111.004 UI UI lD ...,+l ..-1..-4 > 1Il.U1$.l .0 . o.
"'" . . k<l-lO C:klllQlIll ,c<l-l$.l$.l ..-4 .,c I:: G l:: m,c k QI 1l$.l'Z .!:lto>. >0.
'ttQl~lDtJlQl):QI U1::l>
'" c U (llou $.l 0.::1 111 III ;:I QI oa,c lll..-l.oo4::J 0 QI"-l..-l O'tl QI+l+l U ~ QI QI"" "" ~
. . .. COQlUlQlOItl,cSO..-lOOUl otl...,........to,o:z;too....,ccs 3: QI..... :S ..-I ~"
""'''' "'0. 1-1010::13: ~..-l+l"'" >,'H.Q O::J .jJ,ckiG :5> "
. =...,<1-1'0 ..-I " ~
.... ;: QI III $.l ..., .
~s~ oc '" 0 > 0 Q) +l 0 +J 0 .
",.,0. '" '" ~ '" " '" QI.jJ.LtiG....llll'lJ "
It//! -Sc;
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
"II
"'!\
S :; on ;~
N
0 "" on S
" u ~
u .
'" c .5 ,
~ "" '"
Q ~ . 0
.. S
. .
z u M !1
.. u ~
-" "
'" . c. u
~ ~ .., "'!\
'" .., " ~
= u !l '"
.. u ] u j
. -5
~ "
" c "
'i3 0 .s
z >>
1= E 5 . ....
u
Z c ~ c
'" E . 0-
'" ." 0 ~
"'- .5 c. u .0
",'" !1 is .
..oo c
u .5 8 ...
",'" ..,
",'"' .. '" ;::; . 'f
_u .a g: .. J
.0 ~ .
oi:l N e ..; ::> ~
"'.. cO u ~
zoo u ~ ~ cO .,
iro. [ c S
~ M
0 ~ ~ ] 8-
z,", !1 6 ,
.
~~ " 0 .g .
>U S ~ ~ ~
"'Z . . S
. 2 ~
-=", " ~ ~
.g . oo " ,
.0 ~ " ~ :; .g
,",u !l u ~
u .
u = g, ~ ~
.
~ ~
u u u u
'" s: is = s: "'!\
'" ,
!: ~ '"! i
'" u u
'"'
...
.,
U ,
!J.J 1l '" t1l C +l Ql I-lG'tJ!:;'t:ltrltro '0.-4 >tl-l tTl~ Ql j
I""'Ic...........a Ql..c::.~ lIS al C r:: C III c..... i:: 0 III
> 2 N . c.. 4.J.j..IOOOIll........ It! C III Ql..... "
'" ,g: e+J"~ " > .00 o .1:; C ='
W ~ . ~ C lIS 1l [.~~ ....... (II +I..... to 0
;;; , " 1/1 ell g r:: a~~Ql~-co .,
U 0 00 +J >0 l-II-l
<< .. 0 ~ U GlJi'-;
4J M +l ......+1...... o,-l'tlm+, +l 0 Ql
'" I .. >-l: 15I:l+l .j..I 5 u 0 o.,..,.l:l
a:: --' .. c +'UIOG+I
Q. .. . ~~U'llI)~ Ql 0 1Il lG ::L......r:: 0 ~u C C 1Il+J .
e " r-IlllNlI)U C_.-l >0 00.+1.... C Ql +J 0 tll Iiil..c:: >.
0 ~tL~:5~ ~c:;:: IV CUI); OIl'll
t . "r ~ ti c...... 0 Ql ::l '"
~ .... ~ .-40C
~11t:JlQl~oG8 ICl..c::J::O "'II
0 0 Ql C 4-1; 8.s::: c 1Il.JJ ~ g'
'" U l:: = lI-+ 0 1Il C c:t", III
gill Ql 0): Ql ....Il:l. +l".-j J
. lI-+ Gl..-j:l UI Ql'~.-t 1-1 'C ); U P: ~ 'fii
.. ~ ~'t:J ~ a QI OI-l{ij~Ill]C~ Ql "..-1'0....
" . ...q::):QI::l+l Q1glll<ll~.-l~;'" ,
0 ,
, u 0 lI-+ ~ .~-= lD__'HOC~lI)c .3r-4:a3:~<tlUCl
0 . .. "'\
0 ! , ll' " o ~ 0 ~ ): ~~ .~o~21 +J 0.+1 Ql e..c::
; s ~ f-r: a . "5 ~ I-l 8- ......w .1:;.-+0......
" , N .. " 00 u 0 D.a trl ..jJ~ '4-l
. " " ); U III C C 011511-1'+-1 .}
" 0 .. ~ .a,JQl'H..... OCC~o);'go
.. ~ .. . . "0" Ql::Joo-S 1ll1lllD~ o.;:;ti~+llfJ"'t1l
l ~ 'il . .0 . trill! C.t:: III QI 0 "
:;: ~ , ~ ~~ B$~ ~ [ .~ g r;;.t:: ~ ~ "
0 ~t ~.~ijl~'O.~ "
! ~ . " .,
. ~ oc:;:! .,.j cg.~~.~:~o ,!o(."",... ,...c:: E-t QI C
, . . c):zeltj> o.t: ,...-i.......... lit..... ~11~... ~ '5~
> . 0 ~ e > . Ill~ u,t ~ trI
" , 0 ... ." OGl 1lI 0 1-1"'" __..... Gl.....o fr
; .., ~ ~ .0" o )...-l.t:: Gl 0 o ..... ~.""'l"l QI >. 0>> c."'" III . III 0>> "
" , ~ ~ 0 ) '0.......... .-Io>>~~o>>~.....e .....1-1;;:10. .s....,Q "
" , ..~ .....~1it1ll~11 ...-l.c:: ~c. QI ,
...; 0 ~ " -a~~,Q1l8~g "
.. " .&::.&:::;:l,.. ~ OU>. Illlllo>>.&::
'" .... 0>>~~8p::o,Q...
l 0 . "''' g......_~ o>>lt'I 0 III C ) trI..... QI 0>> U
~ 'il . . ,..... c.....N 0. ,..."", c.""'fj........ fj.....lllCU~~.3~ ,
..,., 0 . " 0'1 Ill,,,,,,"'" g'1if c:a ~ .....~ ~
Cl" ." N ~ ~o IllQlIifO<.jJ.... .d~...-l:5~r--Ill...
>~ 1-1 o III 0... Ill,.. ,
". m ~ &l'll ~-;: "
..;I . . . "" Illo ...-l01ll1-l..... ........ +J 0>> +J C "
.. ~.o ~N .0 o.~ 1Ii......E! O'l"l.......... lll.d 0 ~~H.3g'~~~ "
8" >.....c.( "'.. .. .. 0 .t::~""'II-l~ .,
".U "'.. >. ..... I-l 0 1-1 !:: O,Q.....
~~ . . > O~ " .0" lit 0 l'llQlIl-lI-I >.1;1 .j.I:3.....'O-.... Ql::l ~~~....ijl :t
'0....0.0< .. " ~ . ..... ): a..... :d ~~ ~$.j.I
IlU ...-l::lQl III "...; . . > .. 'OO...-l ~ !::.;!:: ,Q l'll 0. ,
Q).dc.t::..... .. .0 ""''0 Ql 1-1"""'" C t1 Q) >.........-l'O 0'I.""'...-l0>>1ll !::E:
.. p:;o .....111 ...~ ." III Q) I-l Q) C O'O.E!III.....II-l,QC <<J ~e.~-~ c.~.....
"gj trll-I-.... . " .. 1-l'O..........,QQ) o C Q) .......... QI...-l III
Ill..... C::l> "'" . ~ ~ ~ &0 ti O>>CJoou .a III 0>> Cll +J .5\..... 0
~.. 1-1 O...-l 0 0" '" ... (I1~~;:::olle~ H'OA.~:::CllmC "'"
.. . 0.. . .0 ~ ~~ t;::
!;!o " >,0 ~ " " 8 ~~ g'+J g,~ .... o.....,Q I-l.c 3
l-I+JltIo.o;;:l . 0 ... ;;:10>>00 0.....
i:l~ fd.........r--.c:: . . 0 QI Clll-l In;;:l Ql 0 0..... 0 Q) 0 o VI C to 0 QJ.""
/L/A /1/0 lllUPoNU .. C " .Q,QII-l.,.,jUl 1-1 0 00.....,Q 0 ):~."",,".j.J'" ):
- N
U U .,
,
,i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0" ~
... .
.. .
"... ~
00 .
~
.. 0 .
.0 .
~ . .
... ~
".. '"
.'" .
.0 ..
.. 0 u
0" . ,;
C" ~ " 0
,," " 0 .
0 0 0
.-,: . " ~~
C" . "
0" .
. ~
.e '" .. . I
..c .. "
..e . .
et '" u '"
C 0
o. ~ ~ ..;
~~ " "
O~ "
~. .
" '"
" .
0," "
00
".e .
.. 0
". 0
O. ~
~. ..
". . .
.
.... g.
""U
0" . ".
.-1...-1.......
U ~ 0 O.
00" . .
~U'" ...
o . . > U
.... ..
"N o;;;.!<.fJ ....
~~ 00
.~ Ql:3~ 00
,,~ "U .
>" "
. - .. . ~O 00
"<ON H..-l+l ~.. . .
. UU ~O
.0.. . . ,~
"0'" .'" . i:i g
.0. ... "
~""" ... ~ "'"
IL(/J ~~ I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.,
....
<;
"
e ~
.
. oJ
<; ;
u 2
e u
e oS
0
u ~ ....
~ 0
...
u "
oS .0 ,oj;
0.
2 0
:E 1l
~ .s '-.
d '"
e
.5 {j
:;
j ..
"
0
u ....
.S .ll
-
"
0 .~ :j,
-
.s ~
- oS
~ ~ '""
2
.
~ ;; ,
... :;
" '"
'6
" iil ~
u
.s ~
" 5
~ C
-" .
:; >
u ....
t= il
..,
U
....
.."
"'. CDlII>,QI 0), C >. CD CD III . CD III C ),11'1 i
c. ,r::,r::.-i,r:: +JGlOC,r::lIJlll>, CDlIl.......Q1ll ;l
'" ~ ,..qJ'tlE-< .Q..-4 lllE-o Ill).... +J>> ;I
> . C 'tl+J+Jo Ql tII +J....lIlGl
C 0", . '" 0 e... e+' ..-l g 5 .....CD/ll;'tlC
~ u~ ~ci::.... ~ U III 0 "'"
" "'~ ~ IOrw III ...... III ~ III GI.......El o a~
. "'" g..l:l+J 0 cg,l:l+J.... 0,", . r:: +J
'" . . '" .
~ a a. ~ 00 +J~......llJ+Jo~ O....c::OO
'" i"''' III C+J '"' eoo'"'. I!!l~ IQ...... III 0.&
" . " '" g'u lJ.."c; CD ~ ".
0 ." .....ca. :S....P<Q)Ql
'" .. .&10 CD III CU...-fQl'tlJ.4 J:'tl ~ U.<:
.. .'1 1l.'" " '" .cc,r::: D.....e-. Ql +I+JlIl+l .,
+J+Jo~ lllC+Ja:'tl~ : ..... c c..c:::
. "", ......ce.&:: IIJ::JQl+J'[J
~ " DCDo.JJ .fG,cu:o III Z+J=m;
" "" G1C1)~QlIll~"':Do
~ . . o ~:;: 0 c ","
u ..<: lll.... :. '"' CIIl1.o III C Gl III )
~ 0", U olo +J :0 CU.....lllQllll om c: c: c
, . III ~.Elm ,
, . !Ie ~~llg .-i >. 'E.Q Gl Ql ~ ;t ~Ql::!oo -i
" ~ 0 c~ 1lI~ III ~:5~:s g Ill'" ............
0 , " .0 "" .'1 ,,~ ,r:: u ~ cu.... =: g'lll~~ ,
" . " c.
, '" ~ .. = "'~ . .... 0 III t:...... +J Ql lIl.ElEl
Z , ~ 0 a >....... c o'tl +J1l'+-l~o'gt3 ",.~
- ~ klll.t:ldCU
l " .<: '" ... +J..-l',..j 6
:;: . " c. ~"'o~Ql""'~m ~!~'8:S
, . .. (j~~~g ,
. ~ " '" '" ...oo.llIgo=~
Z 0 ~ Ql"8~-;;: VJ U" ...
. M " " '5l.311i
- , ~ ~ ~ C"'O+Jlll+J ~1l~ ..~
> ~ 0 '" ~ '2 '" . :5~ ..g.., o Ql4J lllf ),
C I C "" '.-4 U D'I.d::s'tl c . " ".0
. 'tl ~ 0'+-1 CD cll.~ ~
" ; " ~ 0 " 0"" +JCc<l-l+JGlnSM
:< 0 ~ u '" u.......,..j Ql G ..... 0 3 ~..-l'tllll'g .~ 'gO+l~
, on " '" 0 :ul ~:s.so~~ ::s" c..-I QI ~ ~
...; , c ~ . u ISl CISlO
0 '" . .0 ISl ..'0 ~ g lUIIIClU"~O~ o~ " ..
l Jj " '" . -.<: u rnZ Ill" C C..-IO QI
~ .'1 . -8~QI C QI g..... QlIIl ::s c.rl~.d .~t cZ g'
u " g'1Il~ rn ~ " ~ g.::s .... g.
.." . 0 S"bZ lUQlcISlO~QI.-i t lU.~'tf::s
i:iH '" " ~ " ]~QI ~.s 1Sl~ QlIIl ~ 8 rn~
"' ;! . .<< c .0 lU.rl U l:t1 ~ 1Sl....1IIQ1.g
0 C ~ 1;' . . 0 III ~ ~'g.g
" o u U Gl~Gl~" g~~ C ~ 111..-1 >-
"0" "c ~rn Ql
00> . > 0 '"", J: g.~.rl 0 <<S4J.Q 1lI~ > 8 J: .,
~~ O~~ 0 . CQI 4.1..-1
orl ~orl '" U c.. Ca:;" ..-1 u ~ m )' c" " ." J
""" . " o c" ;IE: u::s bl Ql III )'g~flI&l.o
~u ~ " 0<< ~~c lllo ISlC n:lU1I1lCCISl" )
" "U 0 0 "a. ....Gl"O J: ,r:..-IOGlC III Co Ql
.. S.<< · ;; . 0 . C Ql U1 C..-I o~~~~'g:;je8 I-lIllO,..j Ql c....
"g! "0 c . . . 0 Gl>tG1ll4J Ql~'I-l c: 1ll.Q
o :J-,..j tG . ~ Il .<:u ....1ll1ll1Sl0 lll-,..j tG~ ~ 0 l:t1Ql ,r:lll ........lll
~H u "'. 0> " ""Co CJ".-illllSl :.: l:t1..:: 0 "'lS!1ll rn E-q..llllXCJ~ .,
.. <Cu 0
to 00," u
.".. . J
t;~ .,..jltllI'lltl . .
l-J~lI'I..:l '" 0 " '" M ~
.., )114 ~(p).,
u .,
'~
;
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
N
'"
'"
~~
o -
"~N
..
..
~"'"
~" .
''', '"
I
I
"-'+I III GI
::::l1U....tJ::
.8:SQl+l
" . '0
..... ~ lQ J::
~ QJ III III
~.
~,g~ C
'tl);Q)O
l=: ..c....
IIltll+J.JJ
= III a a
8 III 0 GI
tDl1I~.c:
~IIl<l-l+J
G1:'tS't:l
~.-4~~
+JGI..-l.:
...-IJ:: g, 0
~ +J III 0
O'+-l k ~
U 0 bl 0
1II~'~ ~ ..
~~~il~
" " .
DoC.:='
+l Do 0_... 0
III I'll..... > a
J::tQ+lQl"..t
.v-rl n:l~ s::
'0" .
11 k~ . a
> 0.... GI
g.-4~~]
IV 0:::1 III
...>UtJ'1Il
.. 0 QI I'll
g Mot"] Do
~ ~:l.~ ~
'" . >
"'"'"
t1l:0~S::
t'J'I...-l S.-l 0
,.. U 1lI..-l
0-.-1 QI +l +J
Q) O.t:: 0 0
t!J>+J+JS
~
k+J't1 III III
ollie ..-! >.
.lo::I\:lUlJ:;.-l
tJll-l ...n-! III
" . "
..... '" titi .. g
>'+-l Ill..... 0.0-4
eo &.;:;j ~
8:lI)~" ~ C
lIS.... III ~.-l::::l
!e..~~ :'0
+I..... t'J'Il-lGl
::::l1l3 l-lJ:loIl
o C III III ::::l UI
:S lU-r-t'fi a
" '0
.;J~'O Gl ~'O
+l:~:J~
~ III 1Il 0
~i~>""D
:S~ ~ g....
.eGl+J+J~
....Q ~
" . .
~"'oJ..l....ta
~ 1fI-IJ CI ..-;;;
aid .c;gP;
","...
lIS:t B~~
Q1: ~~~'t:l
]r-le.Q~~
a QI 00'tJ Ql c:
,Q C+J 0
c+l QI ralll g
g tJl:S ..:S III
~~ -~<I-llll
=~~~o~
k .......
QI 0. .....; u C
O'Oollllll::::lO
klll::::lQl'O"P'l
orn.....kO+J
Q).... IU C k 0
t!J'tJ>::::lPoIiil
~
t'J'I'OGlIll),1ll
CGlkkUllI
-...t'J'IllIGI...-4);
>1-1 1II.-t
o IU k ::I 0 c
~'fi-~..... o.~
g.Q1t-;;;~~
~.Q:+Jga
'tJ 0 Ql~::I--1II
J.l+'k+l8.:::
0] Gl),~ +J
8'~:S~o'g
."", 0. U illIG
>01: +J
ekO~.;;c:
P,o.l-I+JllI~
D.IIIQ1'1-lJ.l.,
lG QI<IJ 0"'" 0
~ 8'~ >.: a
o III uk QI
J::1jl!~CIl:S
~ Q).aJ 0:5
);,d'-lQ, '0
~.jJ 0 GI ~ ~
64-1 Glfi'g 6
'004~ ~~::l U
~4-I 0'0:
El ~JJ +' ~
ra~+,.g,CIl g .
CIl 0 k-004 In!:~
],c o..-l::l...-l In
El;J~ r:: k::t:::J
lG GI-004 0 !: 2
6 It) CIl+,~-oo4...-1
~lG:g5~~~
lG GI GI-004..-1~ r::
:;.:: lll"'~ 0 lG ::J
41: QI;;: g. -'0
g'..-Ifi~ 1Il7 m
041 In >00 III
CIl,c O!: ra 0 ra
t!)+'.a.J.oo4p..oqop..
~
OI't1CU.a.J1Ef
~~:5~~
> 0 .Q J.I
O..-l.a.J CII
J.I..-IUI,c
p..lGlG4J'c
Do CU0r400
:~.-t;'<<l
-0044J.a.JmP:i
't1 0 1Il.a.J >0
kr::k~.Q
OmO..-l't'l
_GllMlMlIl
V'.a.J C't'l
_~ lU It.I 8 C
>..-1 >0 0
Efi~'t1 g
p..lIS ....U1
Ooog'gUl
lG-004.004l1llU
0..<: >
~ g,1JI 0 IJI
O..-l;j.a.J.oo4
'co Ill'c
~ CIl8'~E-o
:J.d...-lJ.l .
.a.JJ.I C~
C.a.J::J ::l.-t
o lG't'llt.llU
...-I.d In_
.a.J.a.JGlJ.l4oI>,
o It.IaI...-I..-I
El Q~t l;Jl~
ltl..-lO lIS!; 0
cu,g U 1Il-;_~
't'l:JCUGl.oo4C
=lIlfi-gll-l~
o II) c_~'O::l
GllGOS~'t1
". .
...-IIJICOmlJl
::E:ra......MCIIIJI
1Il<<l .dltl
C..-Ik.a.JUp.
.004 .a.Jlnt:
>cu k::l't1
CII.d 0-004 lG C
:O;4J4J~..-I<<l
~
01>0..-1401. CII't'l4J G
r::4JlGlIS...-I.dCr::.c:::
-oo4...-1C.d 4Jltl1ll4J
~::l~4J~ r:: ~~'t1
k U4J ......'00'Ir::
Oolll...-l ~~.d CUIll ra
g.~:g...-lH~~~
It) CII <<I g ;........6
....... .-!......
"Cl g... ~.u~lr1!4J
k.c:::......<<IIIJr::0.a.J0
0401 000-
1Il'O.-!kIllU'I-lCU
8'.8 ~ III QI...-I III O.c:::
'004 ~.c::: l;JlIII >,.a.J
> III ~ 41401 r::.Q 401 '0
Ez III ~",'004 0'1::: 0)
g; BkO~.;1:.c:'g
Ill'g g,~ QI g,:J...... 0
.a.J::J1II0~ Z~~
::l e 0I11l.a.J 0 III
0<<10 1lI'O Po
.d r-4k.a.JZr::1II0
.a.J l;Jl G III lIS cu CIl
~.~~fi~~'OI-l.~
~~:B 0 III ~ ~ JJ:IE: .
5 [ >0:5; ~ 401 .~ ~
'004 CU.Q PoG! > III
~ ~~ 1:0 1Il.Q:! 5
.a~_-g0+l.Q4J IS!
o k't'loo4 C ..-l
1lI.d 0...-1 CIllU ~ m - ~
lU:J I: g..a.J'e lJlCII CIl I:
'g lIS 0 CIl 3 o-~ 2 ~ ::l
_ +lkOC 00'0
III .-!_oo4.a.J'I-l.dQl
~ltl't'llnlll'-'~~-:;:::l
...-l QllIl..-l,a >0+1 0 ra
k III 401 k 1Il.Q P.
Po =~ 8'8':X'ii'fi GI r::
a..-l:::~~ ~=.a.J:5-~
r-40) kl-lUlttllS +J
~:5~ g,[~~:5"c; g
'"
)i/!~?)
0'I1-lr::'O
C QI CIl G
...-I.dr-411l
>+Jt!)1Il
0'004 III
". '"
8:1: _
lG o~ r::
lIl't'lOO
:a~.g-r1
~u 0
OlU+I-
lJl~~C11
.;1lU.Q.d
>u "
0" .
~~:5'E
'" 0 .
. " 0
~GI+lr::
O..Q t:JI 0
:5G1!:-r1
......1-1...-10
:J1!'gJi
-" .
" ~.
0" .<:
"j~:fi+J
0" .
. ",'0
llS Q 1Il
QI'6't'l'8
't'l.dCO
~ :J ~ ~
. .
" .
~~:5 g'~
llIC1l ::Jill
= ~ 'H:~ 5
Ql 41 0 GI Iii!
lJlr-4 '0-004
k QI C C
o QI"Cl ra <<l
GI.Q-004 k c:l
t!)+JIIJi%l::J
o
~
t:JIc:lGGI.-!
~~:5:5~
>" .
E~:5B~
P.IIl...-lllSOI
gok :J~
. . .
:a'8~~:5
k::J~...-l 41
~a't'l'g~
cra~lIS~
...-l k '00
> lfl: III
Ek4J+'+l
p.1lI p.QI 0
p.IJ.CIIr-4C::
ltl I U QI
.Q>:'t'l..-l
~~~1Il~
o ".<:
:5~'e: III
~ +J g t"~
- ""
5-:;: Ql ~~
'004:5:5 e~
~ ~ IJ.I:
ElCll:Sk
nS'6")"8..
Qi.d >'0
'O;JlIlk~
~ ra.~ m ~
C III i~ ~
~ 1Il.Q >,......
~G.d.:1O'1
=IJIUo.c::
1Il...-l1:_004
~~'i III ~
" 'O~
o Gloqokr-4
CIl.d - 0 0
t!)+lr-4:J'I-l
~
~
'""
....
i
'"
....
""
""
,
'.j
...
..
.,
~
"'l
...
""" "''0 -tJ'lGl"CJ Itl C.&J QI UJ:: >. "'CIII"',..", . ." GlQlQl'OQlGI llIltJ'tlIllUlUlJ.4
0." Calli) C.c: Ql ~OIll.c::.....U.a o O....q; q) r:: .~ . =fip~~5 IIIIll..-lElIllIllO
c. .r11o+G)......&J'tI Ql.~:S.&J~ ~'tJ .... .....c::<<:l ~.c. Qj.a::s1II.c:::I>
..c >..-l Gl '"' C g'.~ ~.s~ El "". . o~ Q'r1 1lI
.00 E &~B 0 3 1II-.... ),::1 ClJ ~ . .....s 6~ g.~ :'fi'i~'Oc'l-l
" ~ ~ ~ 'fi.a 0.>0] .....a. III al ~" '" .,
c,"" p.Q)>c~Ql > 0 0 ,.. >,.... ~. ~1ll'C.&JO't:l 1II-r-+ .&J C 0 C
.f< a,Io+CGlolG .-I '"' ::s al >0 Co o .........CJ.l o . QI.&J QJ iIIl U a ....,eal...-tIlJ"j...-l
>0-'''' 1lIQ)1-4> 1lI Gl Q,!.II 1I).a III M kk 1lIJ:!. ." . Ql )I ):,.. 0
.U.Q 8:g'iil,...d "c. ,.. C CD I/) '" u --j
"''' .&J.a >tEl': ~ .c::1II'O::J. III . . ,.. aii'd.... m .dCCU Iiil:
::l rn cOlli .&J Ql m..... III .&J.&Jog. PB::: :;:$ m.a ..... lD .. .&Jt1IGl,..gj .&J
~c. .8 QlIO~.~ C cu~::soll} Gll:1d .... U o.t::o C '..-1 al ::s u Gl 0
.." lr.....g.c::w III .&J U CD.... CIIIlS Gl81l1UCaO ~= III o.,-l..d >
.- C ". 0 :::J.... III III N PI: ""I
0" 0 .... III tro .. e.... .....:lQl+J.c:,IJ) 00 Ql QI u: ;... .0" .c: .......... u.... ""'tJQl .lJE-t
.00 >"c; .&J't:lllSi~-;::~ > > 0 Ql 0
"'.. ); s.s: a.~ ~ c J.I ...&J; III :S>t.~QI.a o . . Gl~'t1 p.,.3 OllltG.&J.t:: :I :}
. . . .. .&J III a.. ,.. 8 Ql'tJ"CJ >..-4 "i ~ c Gl.c:'O "" > c.... I-l.....c:: t: ,+' .
.&J c.,.,j Ql >. Po .a QI C Gl.d "'.c EIlIItI;~.c::! 8::Sal"CJQI>O'tJ
. . ~ll~=fill~ g.Ql"CJ~1lS ~ . 1lI.&J IU "'~ 0 III )CIlI+JQl
J..l..... III ...IJ Ql 0 tJl'S : i"j C.m ".-I Ql~1O !:.c: &8. ;::~
~~); "-'''"'1Il'"' E-I::s mill.... "llI E';!.Q+J.s 0 g."8 8'$10 ~ ~ III ,
... ~I/) 0 ...t =::l Gl f.= ~oo 'Og' U1+J...tGl
"" ~Gi'l3oal lU ..~ ::l+J~GlUlM "oa U1...t.....+J.= c o...t Gl C u....
. "'.... ::I...... '='0 >Oc ,o......,g.r.l:;t.j.l . '@ ..c~ ~ 10 ~ lIS Gl .....+Jcc+J 0 ...,d UI ........ tll.
. . -2,gIA+JGlttll ... I/) 0 +J 1>0 '0..... ~. .= o+J~+J ~""-n ;j
..c oQl "UJ:: ...... Gl~U1'O'OIA .c ."'Gll!!ltti..
"". QI ~ l5 tJI.s ~~ z...... e..... ~ 'gOtllO~~ """ :. U G ...... g~.. g~~ ~
'0 ..... J::.... 0 8' ~ ~~ g .0 Ull:Jlll:l...t:,
a . lll.d.=.. .cc" -; > ~ 0..)
"0'" I: Ill....... QI...'O .....~. tll QI >0...... ...:'.....c:+lUl " . +I~"'" ~~..... ...
o...t: . ~ 1ft to UI'U p"CIl IZl to III. O...t c." lISO.=tll...... '0 OCll..Qg:.........+I
~'I-IQJ~ a:ltll......::l II) ~fj..... e"'~ l:JI~ fjflC'= o~ C .d_.........::c B 1ft 61 t.~ 61 0 o::l ,
C Gl &(1) =~: ... ...U....~C ~II) lllGl~ ......... ...tift 13o.d.d'O. ..Q
+1'00.111 ..........3 g~~;::;1fji
U QI 0 ::l culftmGl"'lIIo. g;c:.:llll.r.l.~ ::l ~. " ,,~. fll+l+l+lNCO
61:."'0 ......"'........111..... lU.~ ~ 3:: ~~1f l!)Ql1i~Ill>. o . "j QJ a"jt+l Ift...t..... 0 QJ
~Gl c.a "'~G1t:........: a. ~ g...-l tIl:j.~
11)..... ..... >o1l)G1~ID+I o.d III...-l U III g
>"c ~QI~~~O) ~t;;G11l11d ~IQ .r.l Id U )..... .00 .El+Jg:::Id+J..... ]"j ~ 3 .. ~:I: ""I
.- . o S.d......c::: QJ ... 1ft Q1~ 5 ~.d:::l >. c.
",G10C Q1:S 0 >0.... ~ '8 .d +I",Ia>::IlU .~ c Id 5..... u c:t;; ~ g o.~~~.~
o..Qt::l +J ::l !dUc. '0 QI U gua; ".~
'0 ....c.d.....1lI ..... !d.... 1ft ;:.d '-''0 ~.d ct.o~::l .c'" QJ +ltll'OQI.El ;J +J III trio.> '1
0." tll g'a lIS ~o: 0 'O'Oor:..Cl!!I
)I QI...-l 1ft ~ l:JI~ a. lUQJ.ElQJlU~lU ..1ll'O .....::l1D
lft+JlftQl l!!I..... k k k QI ""'.~Qlii al g C.....~. CQJQJ+JQl'O::O:;
. .. .ElIllJ.l.dlllO.d
QllllJ.lIft ~ ~~o 8',g.~ ..'tl.....Ift...-l.....C ~ trlVl g......d...-l 0'" > . lUGl+JIQ'tl+J O'tl +J......d
o C . 2 3~~ ~~.~ ~ )lCQJolU+lC . .'" g.r.l.d !d '0 ~; ~ 4) t'~ ...
uo>oP" )I k..... ~ ~ tIl:l:: -~'O U "'1-1 ~ ~~~'~
lU-.... tll "'0. .S ..+I (fj.j.l~E.~ C.j.l~""'QI""'c lU III > l:JIlll
""" 5g..~:!!~~ 5e~~=O::l :C' " .....J:: llI.....tlllll 0:: .. QI 0 C tIl'lJ j
N ~oc :l:: G1l:J1..... 0 U Po a 0 :I: ~~:S ..S C 1II k k..... tIl al
m 0" . :;L~~ ~z ~ ~ ....c ..... ::l "j g;+J. ~t~ 61 QJ ..El ~~ 0.g;'Z ~'g ,
m ~. " c..8...t QJ 0. III k.d E'l:JI+J..... cm ,d....o
~~ ~ ~~ ~ O'tl 61 tll ~ -;~~~~~~~ o III +J.Q e-GlIIJ . c c ~f:et.j.l'tl"j k,=CllllllalO
.El k o.~::::~>o SIatllQl 0. III o c...... III g)l:.~g2g
o . ::l 0 0 61 1II .j.l..c:::r-4U1Q1ld ...-l..c:::.d::lUllll QI tll 0 t: Qlt1l0fllOCO .,
"mM o.U...:l...:l -<O+J...:lOtll.Q ::O:;tllUl+JO::lkfl:: 1<C'tl+J+Jo.tag. "'::E:~;.1 ~tU""lIo4+JtUa "'tU.Q'tlk::lUl
'" l
. .
ac," ,
'''''::1 III N M ~ t1 '" .- .
""'" ~ ~ ~ J~11 ~ ~
./ .,
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Gl-IJ'l-lQl ..
.c m o.r::
". " ~ 0
~ &6 '" .
OQl-..l'O . "
~ J.l.4J': "
.. .. 0 ""
"'" ~
'g~~'C '"
" 0
t:: 0 III to u
.~~~& '"
" .
" -.< 0
.0 0 l:rt Ql '" ..
o g'.~ +J " .
. 0>->
:'a a ~ '" 0
0 ""
~&::"':i " r"
. . 0 ,;; :c""
. "u
.,CIl.jJs:: " ~
~"O.~ : " 0 "" -
0 " > "
. > ~ . .0
In >o~-IJ u "'jj
"
r::-IJQlQl 0 -.<
0..... -IJ.o u .0
uu@ '" >->:c
.. '" "
Ql.t::lllC 0
'tj.j.l+JlU .
Ill-IJ'~.-l "
. .:> 0 ."
'" . -.<
tIl-IJIll'c . " "'"
I\:l .--4.jJQI . .0
;lID=' .l< 0 ...
s::2:B o~ &~ ."
"'"
..; 0" " . .
.,-l..-l'H Ql "U -0.
. .g~O't:l:5 ".
" " 0 "0
"" j:;8~~'H ." 0
. "'"
'" o 'n go 00 ""
. t::~Ul-lGJ > 0 " "
0 . " '" 0
N .r::.!t:Ql t:: "'.. 0.
0 D\lll.cs::',-l . 0
m " 6...:l.f..l.....l"ql OM 0"
m '" 00 ..
SM " .0>0+.1 ,.. "" .
0 0 .f.J4J I'lH:O 0 .. 0"
,...;~ ...-t..-l,O lot:: .. ""
" <U-4-1,.,:CUl ~o r:: lll'.-j
" ."u
o. .
. ~
""'" 0 "-
-.-t:::ltll m "' ~o
"".. M 0.
>->u
F(4-?S
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~ "0
-g
'0
8.
z
o
'"
z
'"
:::
'"
"
'"
o
'"
"
Q
'"
'"
E
""
'J
.,
"'
"I
"
c
"'
I'.
"
,r,
..
.,
"
.-,
"
~
~
"
'J
.
.
"
"
. ~
.
"
.
z
.
:
y
t
z
.
.
.
~
.
.
~
.
o
g.5
0"0
~ -=
~ ~
.3 8-
~ ~
'"
"3
8
00
o
'0
g
.
~
.~ ...
.:;: ~
~
l ~
.. -5
B '0
. 0
~ ~
00 "
o ~
:g ~
] g
,,-"
= .s
:~ g
u -5
-s. .~
~'"
(5 ~
N' ~ e
.c N lS u
~ c 00;. -a
~.9 e
~ ~ ~ ....
e tn 8 .8
~-s
"8 .~
's .5
. 0
[g
. II
~ :=
" u
::t .~
E
>.
c
"
o
U
o
00
u
is
.g
.
"
'"
'"
>-
~
"'
-'-
o .~
.--
:i~
--:
-'4:0
;r';
.
Eo"
:;-:
.::':!
'-.
,::a.
-.::
.- .
-..c'U
IC_..,
~Q.c"O
!~:".!
'Q.-'i ..
:-~:=
~.--;
~ --
......c:;l-.
- .-
Q~o=
'04-:;'
=S:e
.~c:e
~og.3
...'0;_
-u:::...:
:g.,Sli
.........
.1:0.-"
-..=:-
~..c;e~
..:1:-:
c~3e
&.--u
..... ~-
u_.. .
"'oil:A.
_.0>0
- -...
-ClC.....
"'-e.-
:e::
-- -
- ..--
.=:&':~
t:.E~
-g
o
u
E
u
'il.
.5
o
o
'"
"3
~
~
"
o
.c
"
o
"'
5
.s
~
"
~
.8
~ 5 .S
'2"~ ;>.
~~l
: ~ ~
E s ~ ~
',o~ .;: "'8 t.l
0:: ~ c ;S
'0 I.;: >.
'" 0 .g ..c
E 8. u II
..c e a ~
g Q. ~ ';:
9 ti .~ e
o ~ '0
'e' :0' ~
0. 0 C
.s E ~
'8' a
'0 Q., C
~ u 8
.9 ~ 5
u ~
'a. e u
~ -8 .~ u
.s u ... oS
[:C ~ 0
'" go 0 c
. " 00
u 0 M
eo. ~ ~ N
~ <'2 C
-< 13 .... .9
g.5 .~ ~
u -5 ~ ~
F~ig
c
.
u
'"
:~
'"
8 E
':0 .[
."
'5 .5
u ~
-5 0
.8. ..;
~
C ':::1
n
0.."
9 '0
II a
" !l
00'"
:= :0
.g .::
'" '5
J 1!'
~ ~
" 00
~ II
'0
."
o
.g
~
E
.s
.5
.
~
0.
.5
."
.
~
II
'e-
0.
"0
!l
."
~
o
.~
.lj
.~ ] ~
ll] .l!
'" u ~
ori .g ~
.~ a oS
II .:: ~
'" ~ .~
c ~ ~
,9 e .!a
tl -
~ -S ~
g 5 ~
u e U
.5 ::s u
. ~ '"
8 '0 r-<
~ ~ g
..!a .g 't:1
~ u ~
S ~ Q.,
- . ~
.!:! ~ Q.,
~ ~ '"
~ '" OJ
~ W ~
c:: ~ '~
-5 '"
"5 '0 ]
g ~ '3
,~ :S g
a c u
:5 ~ i
8' <<: '0
q~
;;: '" .S
""!'
...
.~
::E
"
0.
. .
[ -~
l( U
u u
s .s
..,
..
,
~.
,[
00
o
'0
o
.
'il.
'0
o
~
-
Q
.
.
.
.
.
.-
.;
.
N
~
!!>
u
C
2
~
-
c
~
..
u
~"
!!
- c
",c
J'= g
..:1=00 0-
t;3.
"s::<
=.:!~~
c. .
e~~.!
:i'o~~
.; :l<o.~:i
.:":_,,1:;
UlU....O
'0
o
."
0.
.~
U
o
c
~
.~
'il.
0.
.
tl
.'"
e
0.
u
-5
N
Q
. ...1:--;100,-':.
.!~:.~&&.~:.
~.;.! & ~i;'i:
;:~-:.;.:. :'-:.
1Ii__.:.,II:V=E
.:.:f:~:~~~~
U . .-_
~~: :=.=:S =-~
5lI:: !;.: __ ...,
v:: '" Il:~ 02.=
~e=.!.!-..- .,;::.
- C ICI:c-
";=~>'Q.: t:~=
-__o<>>&_u
S~~:E.: ~!~
... 0-00.0_
'U:It -.l!- v'::':;
'::=.D::i~~~=
. -v:o:l<o..oo"'o
.;.J:;2;c~li
VC'-_.OC::a.
= illDCc:.c 0.0_.0
:ei:i!-!:~::=
::2 0;: :.:-.
~"i~~..::.s~
-=.~Ji=~-:'~
-==.oc.:.-;~-
00=-"0.,11::'0
~-;; oa-.a
:~:;~~~=-;!
.0000~...oo co
e_.::~-~::~Ai
;.:-= ."::0..::;::::
-:-_!~.o_-;:~
&j';:;.:-:'::: :~
~52g:Si.~=
.;~:=.==.';:g
e"g oo:! t: '" E _o~
;; -~ s.&':~.~:!
:!; .~_-~.."O
O'::E~og~!!--:::
:-u.:::i ~2 Iv~-:
.t..::.a~::Ic:5;"''':
ii~~ t ;';ii; ~
~ oS ~
~ '0 e
o ~ 5
~ '" -5
:0 "d
-g '~ a
..: 8. a
. ."
~ ~
u E
-s .E!
E g .S
'e' <II ";j
~.:: ~
oS -0 c
II 0
o u
e ~ -;
-ae~
,58 s
.8 Jj
a ;,j
.:: .~
:a 'E
~ .lj
.
~ E
3 "[
~ ~
,2 e
i g
." '"
's w
~
o
o
.9
c
~
0.
~
0.
00
o
'0
"
o
.
. c
!l U
~ ~
~ >-
e ~
E ."
~ ~
'0 0
a '"
;d'til
~ ~
0. "
,s ~
. g
'" =
a ~
.0
l~
~
'"
Q
:~.:~:.gi.
.:2",-c_:;
:a~';o!t.!
o cA-
:coo_c...
_~u--Oo
.s:i':i~':
.tI_-c~...
~-.!':tf::
o_.""o.c;
0_ 0 ....0
I: G COo c: o.c;""
~-=.:~.~.. .
:_-;:;_"';'0
~~.r.;;:g:
...0....011:0_.
o g..; ::a:C u:9
c:...._C1c_=~
.2 Q.i=.:!::~:'
;,&u:;.a.:A.=
c:~c_...c..:
ee~==l=o.:
::-o:a::'i
D..t="a &-= _~
- - v c: AU COo
~..:.!::o~.;-
=.:~_:.:-:.x
"i !..'i':~!:
_s& -~-o
~.,g e:; i~
:..~=::if
=:gt~~ .
o C..t= u--....c
Q, 0 _ c c.= c: _
"'~e..e~..!...
... ... _-...... _ 0
u 0._ _ -~-
=u~.:~iuo
c:..!t,,~J; 0:.: x.
~e~oo"'COo:
~Q,s;::2::
g~~ = :..:'0
-.:o..~=-!~"'=
'0..:11 c c.: ..
CJ...O_....!:
0'0 0..01;';..:11_
U.'Q 0- U ::t
~E:ti"i::ag:
...
Q
.
:g .-
~. ,5
!l ,~ "C
.... .... e:!
'5 13 "C.~
u.. 'c ~
. 0
... ~ 0
~ ~ u
'e ~ 2
0. '13
~ 5 '~
-s ~ <II
'0 ~ g
~ -50 '0
~ 'a
~ g ~
~ .~ 0
..: :c ~
U "
> 0. '
." U '"
~ -5 OJ
~ ~ ~ ~
] ~ E ~
.~ ~ 'e' ~
~ .l: ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
<II Q., ~ c
C :I: 0 0
~ ,~ :~ :~
Q., e 0 -is
...
i
~
-
..,
--
~
>-
-"
'0
U
'"
."
~
~
'"
Ii
.5
.,;
U
I;
'il.
"
U
~
~
"'I
~:;=~;,~
'C-::..c: ~':i:_
~~c.;:,:;
!u!~~.2
.... ~ = ~o -
;IOo,U _ U ~ C
=~~ t:.:
"':0.':; &: u
~ :...a :: ~
.:.!;~.:::
'00.......-
__.=uo::l
.. ~..... 0
ii ei ~:!t
i A.....c:'::..
.;-= =-::::
1':"0 ~.!:
~:~..c. ~
........--So
"CI'U_ -
-=;=g.s:
-=~~:5 g ~
-..:!: g.e:;
.2g:=!;:-
co..5 <>>'0
V__OO::ll
&: :1::;..:11:;:
0~1I::2-.
-"0 ..>oC.,o::
.. __ u_
:a1..;i.!!!"CI
!,.g,~-: g.
o:!':~uC:.c
E.2""-:: u
"Q'tv_..:
~I~g~.ll:
~:::.s::!!
-::-; g;i
g~.':: _ J;
=-~=:::
_.. >U-;a
.i!i;1~
-"';c::c=
;io,CClOC
1-'SJ:'x to;
'"
Q
""l
~
..
~
'I
,
J
-
,
"'I
.,
A
~
-
I
~
,
..
t;
,
-::.:o:..=:!:::::~
~::Q.-..;:;~g~E-d
o::a.~Qil:t:~.&:.::
... 0.111 011: .-oa;a
.:~"'~:~i.3j=~
_0.-.,=-::. ....8
c~:;c.>._.~u
-",-oc ~...t= J::I.
;~:5];::sg=o
:.t.lu~.cS:_~c
:oII::'o-U...~ .__
Q-_.c_c-;a.=t..2
.. c~ -:- _""0 Go":
~..!!:'o:~.!:~:e~
'::;1-0-;;1.:"':
::=~~;.=u:;':i&.
.-Q,,a;-S,S. ..t
ii~eCOJ;_ .II:::-~
e:!6~'"" - ;:Co.l-:
~~...::=;!.._:
:...~A.! =.s~ ;.eo!
",,-'1:-"2; a..... 0"'M.
...- o"!c; I.: ;...a.: H
~~:.!.!::o-=;.:~
!.~ g"';.o :_c:l<o.~t.I =
.... c:. -... - Coli:
;~e~.;~2e:0:
O..ol:c _"'0'0..
-:::':.:e.;i::-;;i
0; ::&.v.-:: u....o,o ~
- a-=Q,U~~C >,0 u
:; =-0: 0;: U a.oo( ; ~ ~
~-5"::=:.:;::n:
~.::o.?;o_.!:_oU:=
__ Uc: II:: J: '00
a :; ~ 0:=.~2 -.8:;
.... -...;a......_
:.:=~.=g:g=a:;c
:ao.:,:;,:Ci.::c ~:.
.-....00 &.!:c:: =
~~o-=:;.!:'.S;:c_:
U..:~.l:o...-_:
.~Sl.iil-=':::;"O~:
S;Glo-::;::!;."
;... E _... (; 0- Q:a=
..I~ ~ &oz ~-=.2 g:!
"6 It! /I t fr
I
I
'" ~ .
~ ~ ~ .~
!i e ~ Q,
F' .lJ
I
8 .~
~ c
[Q 9
~ ~
.~ ~
U '"
o fa
F'
I
E
o
e
c
g
>
c
o
~ ..:.il_o
~ .~ .
..8 Q., ~
; ] ~
Q 21 ~
'" !l ~
C .5 ~
U 00.5
e .g
8 M ~
<3 05
g 8 >
o c 0
i:! .~ .s
2...9 C
.. ~ 0
~ U e
'0 0.
S
"" ~ 9
~ .s "5
~ ~ ~
f1 oS "g
c: '; 8
I
I
I
I
I
..
Q
I
I
,
:?
I
~ I :
"
~
"'
I
'~ :;
.~ ..
I
, .
~ .
I
~j ~
;~
,~I :
'J t
.
"
.
.-.. ..
.
.
.
"
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
.
,
I
c
o
.
i1 u
'g ~
o. 0
::r.s
~ 'a
5 u :: ~
'" ~ ~ :=
g IS. =' 13
'c ~.5
- '0 - c
;- S ~ ~
~ ~ ~ j
.Ii 5
> .fa E ~
..s .8 e 's
] ._ 0 e
[ U~
"~OjO
u .::! -5
o ~ ~
~ :J 0 _~
-= e: a ;.~.
ij ~ '= v
:E .8 ; .s
i:l: - Cl. 'a
'" 'Q a
e \Q 5
!l 6 ~ .&J
C 't: e
.- i:$ .5 u
~ '" e
~ Q ] ~
u I: ~ :.,::I
~ ~ ~. :s
~ ~ ~ ]
~ ,g s
'1:) ~ ~
'"
iil
o
F'
]
o
o
~ e
.~ ~
u ~
i!. c
~ 0
~ '.Q
:i &b
~ ..,
~ M ~
~ ~ U
N :a
M a
~ 0
!boS
. ~
o.~
~ ~
.g .s
';;; ...
8. 0
u M
< 0
u .lJ
.s .g
o
~ 1l
t: 5"
.E c
~
~ 'i
.~ 'g
i '[
..
c
o
.;;;,
o
'"
~
-"
..
>
~
5
o
.lJ
.E
u
<
u
o
oS
~
o
.~
&.
o
F'
"!
'"
e ~
" ';:
.s M
. 0
~ ~
.~ ~
~'O
l ~
II) ';>
'" ~
E '"
~ fa
~ ~
g 0
. 0
:;: ~
~-
1 .~
& g
~ .s
] 'ii
",'0
g 6
0."
<';I ~
~~~-"
fa 5
~ u .s
~ ~ 'a
~ <E i:
~ ~ ~
E'ea::
o iil
<301
~Lt
is .s
@ ~
'" .-
.s ~
] ~
M .5
"5 E
e ~
8 ~
"''''
c 0
.. .
~ il
> -
o 0
o c
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
0.5
o e
~ <3
o i:'
~ ~
o .s:
'c "'0 ~
'5., -< t::
~ ~ f
01 01 ." ~
c u !:a ~
.~ .~ 'g a
~ -0 ~ .s
u :s Q. 8
: ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
M e e ==
::s 51 C .g
. .g.
o :~" 1; .~
c - U '5 '"
~ .0 ~ "
ugu~o
.S~!=c_5O::
e e u
o 8.'~ E ~
';;ouB~'s
U "'i! ..s ::! ... .0
-s ::s .8
~ "
~ ~
e -e
..s ~
oS ~
o
o E
<5 c
c ~
S
~
Q
. ._:>0....... '" 0 c:l . ...
'3-=: :;~=-=;:. a~
i = :;.::;~..5~ ~~-e
--=c~--:~~.ti.::
'=uc.~~Oo;::t:ic:;-
,:~ 00:.2 ,;:::.-...
;o~t~..:c:::.i'E
CI':-_G-~C,oa..
.;.. : ...~i:. : ::0 g-
:::.A.x."':;.Di-
;::~u"~~:j!:
c:~o;;:eg;:_.:-c
:::'::;3~2S':
a, 0 :=A ~.-=.. .-
!E......3--ea::i
-:.:~ .":;:z.-=
...-00.-.. _
c-.c--..c - u"
:~~.:~~:.:~-s~
~t:---.g"",-:""o
~_o'"o:~!=-_C:l1
.-- _C,o le-.
-:g~E:.!:<-.:::
~::;=~...:;--.:;)
~~.:;; as ~==~-~
_~.~O"'~~e1:-::::
:i: .. e li..=..: :::,:- Q.
_Q>-O'-:.t::Q,_=~_
.s-~---~.c:....-
~o~gv~~g ~.=
~_=iii-:=-=(J~t~
:~::.":~~';e_-
:3:E-=Q:~(~s';
0...... =- c: ... 0
:; 0';.. 0: .:~ ~.:,
J:H;g~~;'U;:-~
::..c:-::;:.::o_a....
::~:.!:-5~-...:=;
:a.:::;c;::u~:::~
:.::::~::i::.e
~--a.!:..u>:;:'Ue
.~o=.5~E;_!~:
t:-::g =~ ;~~ Ci.:-::
.... >'u 00 . 0.; C,o c
~~:~~~;~:
~= :;....-;.. :i",;;:
... 1:_ 0 Q E '"
eo -='C..>.>oo
-= S !~:: 0 X,A e
c-ii=c!!.....: ..
~ia~:::.-=:
: u o. -oe.. Q:
E ...(J .. ~ e:-s :a
u~ :::; ~'t::I &os i
~-:-="II~";!=3
_O~Q G_uo
oa."o,.! ~..:..
:eoo(;:_ oe-~
_:... sO:~):Q
-s.ga,=-g:!:;
_...~_tQ..__
:::=':j;C;=_
~ ."'_....:::.";Oa..
-5~'; z.;.~~ ;.~!
>.~ >.=-... :\.1.
.D"AIlClC_t 00
c;- a";'; a~Q.
~~':::>~.KJ:C:
-a ~:! e ~~~i:;.g
-=~:;:ll_~i...J!
~ ..-::~ Q~.Q,~:'3
~.:;'~oo(E"o.'o':::
Q,C,oDo.a:3.:=
...~ ...~;:-:~ e o~
=~-S:c:.uo..oo(~Q,.
~ 400.E-l.:= ~'o.:
....AIl~~-_JlC400.U
'Q,C..O u -- c:: c::s
e':-.:! =':~-'t::I
~....u.::I_Ill.c::A
;;_olC::~_'Uog
s: >0.. :;.,g,Z:;:& ~ 0
OE e~~-
..o~_ ::I u-.
II:-::..-a,go:'~
E i :: > E ~ =~:: ~
:;o.~;l>.'" .c..._
".:e~~.!:;;~
~_AO._____
"
~
c
,
.
.
.
o
.
~
.
.E
:;.
~
.
.5
E
o
:;;
.
:;..
;e
;;
.
~
.
~
o
~
...
.
~
.
o
.
€
u
.
:l'
o
.
..
~
.
e
~
Q
u
o
l
o
z
.lJ
~
;;
.~
]
~
o
'"
c
.
~
o
~
o
0.
; "0 '0
o c _
.S ~ ~ :!
I!::!: U ~ "0
= .E ~ '5
G:i e := ~
~ e 0
~ <3 ~ ~
~ .8 0
.-:...:.: 0 -S
~ .f ~ .8
:= >0 0 u
t:i E c: :e
:e 6 .9 0
.;2 U ~ ;>
:; .l! .9~
:.s ... 0 0
~ ~ t= -a
!G
o ,g
~ u
c..~
c 0
u 0
~ '"
o il
> -
~ .g
~ c
'" 0
c u
'n *
~ .
" ~
o 0
e ~
o e
e 0
o e
c ~
" 0
~ ;
JI
;;; c ~
6 .8 g
:E ;3 M ~
;S .c :J ~
~ t3 0: a
,S ~ ~ .;
v '" .5 a
9E~ci
= ;> G:i
Ui .= 0 "'@
~ c: c
o 0 0 u:
oS :: 'a 0 ..;
'0 0 3 oS 6
>. ,2 .~ ~ '~
.g ~ a .g :[
~ ~ ~ .g .5
6 d .= '"
o <.l "0 ~ g
c: .g ~ ~ .15'
'" := '" ~ a.
.: ~ ~ i ~
o e 0
~].~i~li
~![~.~"'~
~~~~.g.~~
oSGJo::~~.-e
~ l< - 0 .2 go.....
:6 :a t.t.I '~ := 5: 0
:; Ii ~.~ "0 g, 6
~Q.,'C g~.c
~ ~.g ~.g -s.g.
...
Q
.c- >.u II: >-.... u........ . c:: 0
~~:;.....!.AO;oo::.-
"'g,~oi'::.!= C,o~g
· - > 1:1 0 .. . c U .;~ v
>o.c:'O~-..l O_Q:I~_
~x.oo(~.:>-~;-:';:E~8.
oO"::"'~:ev':::'o"e
.:-e:i:;' ,og31:'::0
-::I'" ';_-"___v":
~..~.: S 0 J: e: =i )l:
'-.a'C:c:::o.!~- ;.e
::_:l'GO=-.:lC~'l:iV_
=.Oc:;~_~~::I_"~:;
s.:::v;:~g~-:.:-.:;:;~~
e~~::o~~--!-oo:..:
~ v~ =~... =~ 00'" e..:-
Aa--~u:!co:.::<V=
~~ce!!:..~.!:!:G400...,.
'ii~!i_"'O~c=-:;:;;
... Uu.!:__C,oE-.........
:c3o 3.AcuaEto.o
c3 "!: ~E 1: ~ ~oc3o=,=;
:; ;l>.S--= -! c.. Q...!:~~
ui,,;o_v...E _... .-0...
.c a "'::ii c: .. - o.>c.: _.11:-
::..l:"O~-l:-:___"o
0......lIC4I(..._ e....."o.::
c :~.:~:.:E';:.~~~:;:.o:
~.sc=~.2-~&U~::-:'s
__0.. 'Uuoo='C~
g.rzo'g=:;.:~:;~=
~.;-t:-:~~~O:S~A.J:
:.:~a ~.!gOo~i.=::~
"0- ;.;.v::o___=__o__
~ ~ CIl "0:: u ... C ::I .. _,D ~ c:
u~o~.c"O"-~hs=.:-g;
.s't::lc-=~.:)::....;h,~-::o
_U~<O"~~-s.o..l:) =:~
r; - * ~ :.!<V-:"& g.!: ~e
=':=;~: &.~ :-<~ e :':"3
ou-~o~.:"O ~'C:.-c
=:;; ': 0 - Co... ~ -.. _ :: :i ::--3
...to~:.: .tc-:';'=-C;:iic
8'::'::~:=u-0:;-G.~E
"Ol....e~-:;.:~.G:;.
~f~~~-:=;:.=::ig;:
\2 a. 1-0 UCCl .. 0::1:.\0_...... 0""
.,
Q
l'f ff F ~ I~
...
'"
o
c
o
'< :s ,=
gq
,g E 9
" a 0
l'~ ,;
oS c
o '" o:J
C ~ 0
.g c ~
o '"
-5 ","'3
:.a ts 0
~ ?1 ~
~ ,5 :c
,e v E- E
~ 'eo. 0
.S:! E E
0. 6 IJ :3
.5 tl ~ lib
v 0 e '<
.~ 'g .~ *
~ ~ ~ j
2S v 0;1 ~
- ~ 9 u
.~ 9 Q
9 "0 ~ a
o . '"
~ ,~-5 '0
"E :E"'@ a
E 0 .~ u
e ~ i ~
g tY .s 9
~ !ii "'3 ~
~ ..( ~ if
"
>
o
~
.
~
'"
'"
E
o
E
~
S
M
c
o
~
o
'"
S
"
<ll
~
M
o
u
0:;
00
Q
":
'"
::~:-: ~:;
-.0..:0...
o Q.,D-;.Q
: ~ :~- 0
:~.c...~c
.~i ;o:.':'j
-......<V
0.1:.... - c:.c:
c: -.0. C,o
-a.... 0 ..:M I
-GCu.._
:::.l:;;
=.<)o..l .-e
... _.:;; 5;
-;; G U"O CAll
c;~=Ca. ~
.!! :.:~ g.5
--...-..
VIlIl. u.c:" 0
-' ---'t::I ~
~-::....cQ,
';-;:0_:
.g:a.::~c
>~&;:.:
::':'::=;0.
--~-._---
o 0 G~<V C
..;; ;h,~__
....- 0 Q,- C
- 0 _ _ c_
;;;c.:iec
.....3=-.:;
~:. ~:;~:
(,.l~g~~C,o
a'aOC::.c.
= ~t: a 00
_a.0 0.0 &
~f~:--
o Do- ~ jJ:..
D ..QOO
..::;:--:: 6 .
'Q --..::0,_..
c.....<V \0_.....
~AIl ~-.:5::E:'':
~ :i.!:,.!.;:-:
v&i;...;=~
......<V_~...
.ci~6'oi~
~--
I:~~
.:~
-=..;
::~:
c:_g
r;,;':
.0_
- - .
. . 0
....~
~.~
Eo'
-E-
-e~
.00
-= ~ ~
u'
. ~o
;E~
..~
0': C
... ~o
.~
....
-;,Q'o
.:.~
- ,.,,~
.~(.1
o~o
--~-=
.;:.!: 'E
-u..
~Ee
_0-
.0_
0..
..c~
~2~
- -
~.-
. - 0
-.; =
a... _
"o~;:
~01i.
:2 E
Q,.e~
.0-
00.
00-
c:~3
..! -
~u.
~OO
~ ....
00
Q
'"
'"
ll~_:s..,_Ut:'a..c_u
'0;; 6 '" .o:r ~
~~~>e;.5-S
.,ll""'~'J:~.s.3'~
~~.E~ulj.g
U u .!:l "e' .~ ~ ~
~ -5 -: Q. E "S 'g
~s~~~~~
~:E 5<tIG'd
;a '1'3 -5 0 .5 ~
~~ ~l'~:a
:g'~ .~ 0 t: g
-, '"d C z 8.-s
68 ~u",'i
;;::1 oS oS l-o
,_~~ t1G~~
<<I .5 u :3:
E ~ ~ ~
~'S .::i~:g
~~ l~~
VI I) ~ ~ c '"
-8l ~;g~~
~ i-~~u
'~'(; U U E 0
~:g ~~O'g';
:(.5 ~ _ ~
n 'E.s.s 0
~ .~ S <; .~
'F. llE a <; u
- u o~
Jl...8 .Si
=
~
.6
;,
'J
"
"
';i
c-
O'
,',
,
.
.
.
~
,
c.
E
.
u
5
.
'~
E
u
""
~
'"
.
il
c.
E
8
:E
:H
~
o
.l!
.
'~
E
~
;o'E
ouo
~..
....2....
0.-
...0=
_.u
.s
g;.;
';0.1:
.- .
i":...
o=~ ;
__ ~ 0
I:Oo.c
. .-
- --.
~=~,g
AA_
.!!~.:
.&-=:
-to;"Cll
.:I:O.c'"
.,::.c :,,;
.........
...oa.:
c... _
_.~ 1::-
...-...
-. ,
=-a..o
:e~;
......0>
.- -.-
c.,
.. 0" Q,
u CoO ..
.1:...:00.....:
-0.0-
:=e~'o
co__
_ou..
e:~~
;: 0.... :.-
- ..-
2~.: !
o. 0
"--,I;
:!:; ;:
_"; ..a
."->0.
o::=~
_0;0
.. :-0 ..
....- .
=.: ~ 1
=-_C1~
"
"
"
u
.i:'
E
~
,
u
~
- ,
i! .
" ]
g a ~~:i
",3-;::;;0..
3 t::~';
. ;o.,.c~...:
.= s""-::
;- ~v
g;:.s-o
iI:: .:1:
: a.~"O.>
2- !:
CoO" 3-..
.. Q, .....
=:'g.J~
g :;.~-...
;....::g!
~:::!"'-
Ji~~"i:;
0-.1:1I8-
-S=~x':
.s:;:~~
... > -.c v
i:;t~i=
...c~.o e
~ :"~.:!
o a-....
i'S&~~
:::;11-
.. >.11I 0
ut-og-
=u...:~
c,...oe~
:0.:.:;
-:':"'''aIO
e- ~Q
. -......:=
,=0 ~....._
:;;;~.:;
_ a..:: a_
-e->-
e._v-
.;u::c:~
-=.s-......
g.1::-e-:
oe"Do..c:~
0":;:; 0':::
Z_Ec:dtQ
s
'"
.sl~.~.s
=- g 5
e -d - ""
e ~ GJ GJ
~ .5 ~ ~
,3c ::g 0 e
.g
.~ :a .8 ~
8 fi GJ '~
,g ~ -S ~
~ * e ~ GJ
'iJ ~ e 5 .~
~ = cu .~ '~
'" ::'~ ""0 ~
,~~].g~9
.s 'i a : .~
5 e -5 '"
'" ,8.= tl 5 :s
,~ GJ 'e' oJ: c
o c.. c.. a: 0
'S ~ ~ ~ ~
: GJ g cu :::I ::l
GJ,~~~.,g'E-
~~.8~8'a
~ i1 .s ~ .0 '5
~-S'O.z.s9
: 'i "" '0 ~
'" '6 ~ C GJ
]~ -g _ ,96
'--O:::l'c=o.c..
a:a.8.g~Q.'a
:s
u
<C
.
i
o
=
.
~
,Q
'0
u
~
:0
.
,.
o
~
~
~
o
110
'0
u
"i
o
.
-"
o
o
'0
.
.
!l !l
.1J .1J
.. u
lt~
o ,.
"0 ,5
:s ~
II ..,
"5 ~
o '0
U "
oJ: ~
~ 0
u
u
Jl
.S
~
.
~
a
!l
.1J "
.1j 8.
;; ~
-E .s
~ .5
E ~
u .a
~ "
o
.~
,
~
u
8 oa n ~
e 5 11 8
(5 .~ e ii
= ~ '= 9
>'.E ~ >.
'5 ,5 'e' "C
~ a ~ ~
""0 '" :::I :::I
:; cu 0 cu
o ci '5 GJ
:t tii > -s
~ GJ '0 j
, -s c
.9 ... .g ~
c.. ~ ~ :>
~ ~ :~ -a
~ < ~ 0
e ~ :g '0
5 "" C ?;-
- . 0
~ i .1 ~
~ ~ 1l ,g
GJ '0 GJ iij
;> C oJ: C U
'~ ~ ;;; ~ ,g
~ ~ .~ tl ~
~.~il<
uu~oy
l ~ ZQ'
o ~ '5 ~ 6:;
Z " E . 0
u.~:::I-8z
t:~~3.s
..
~
.6
;:.;; o2~ ::=~~;
.: :z~ ~._ :='3:.; ~
o-:.;~=: o:~.:!~
'-- u-.o- ~ ~ ~ c;
';;0'. : :; ~ - U . 0 .
"- s"S:::..."r::
- 0 A.';... 0 '-_
:;'O....o.c f"uo~
....- ....:.~.a
"i-:-;::=- .:-:....u
o=:-:~~ ~;....o:
~.~3.::';: .00':"
E-E '*~:~-__
Q,-::"'=E ::100_..
....c;OJ:o e~~::;:g
L"'~~e: E....:g:v
:;:o_:a.... go...._.=
c&:-cii"a ...._c_
:!..... ~1!-'~"i
;::=;.; ~aE"o
:-s-=~:~ :if.ee-:
:0'0 :..:.: ..Cl. .0-
~_~<aJ:-= ~.=~;~
~:; ;:J~ .-_c; >
~~;:::: '=':-=2':
: :~~&.! l;':;~:
...........0: U 0 008
...-eA..._ ::~__
.::~~~.::;. .:_.,E~
:-:~:.:.= -!..:;~i:;
.0:8'=:0-.0 ~;;:~8.
:.. & .. = e-= c:: a 0 ~ :
';.. i .0': E .2~.:: ~ .
..0 0 - e. ""
~ ~-::.-= o:.t...-_
:= Cl.::~ e2:~~
ue.~):.c:. ':~:i:......
..2~~-:::: "-0'"
c.._-.;:IoC ~,=::."'u;
~<.-.:! ei-lc;'=.c-=
::u-S:t _: __';:---:
0.9.. Q,-- -- c:: c::..
:2: ~:-S ~i:E--"
.....:! Q,!ii. ':;'8::;.:
.00."00 .11:-0:..2-
t:~~t:;111~~~ 3
"
u
,~ :g
,.,Q
. u
'0 ""
.g [:J
~ E
u u
, 0.
'0 C.
o ,
8 g
* ~
~ 0
,9 .5
<<i 13
~ U
M u
-g =a
" u
~ ~
8 :8
-e ~
is :t
"
"
u
is
a
~ ~
81
,s ~
E 9
,g II
"9 'Q
i:! E
'r! a
is ~
~ '"
~ Ui
.s ~
" .
M .9
~ a
:s '=
~ '5
'" ..
~ ,g
" 'jj
:s cu
'0.8
'>
e
c.
<-i E'E
~ '2 ~
~ $ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~
....- - ~
i:l:: .!::I
tii l""i : ~
~ 5 8 .g
-S .::: 11 l:3
.9 ~ of oJ:
<U ~ Q
g ~ :a i
'0
= ,5 9 c
-8 M '" .2
~ e [.~
F' ,5 ,55
,.,
~
Q
. -
~-
-~
"S~
:c
-.
.-
51
.....
oC
--
-
-0
Vo
&-=
.v
o
;-
00
...~
.-
~o
.-
..
'Ce
ee
SE
00
o.
-~
=s
~~
_0
s~
0=
:'i
.2-
;,u
OV
_0
-.
.-
o
~o
s>
o
=0
.v
~-
-~
0=
-~
:41:
~"i
-....
):c;:.
0"
,",00
::
Q
..
..
,
5
'~
.
;;
,.
o
>
~
II
iE
o
u
""
.;. 'O.s
0'
"'
U
.....
,
<c
,~
.
.
.
"
~
c.
,5
..
'=
o
II
8.
~
~
.6
=i ~ -: ~l: to:;
;''G': :;.9~;'s
:-~:i!::';:
;: >..& a :; ~ E': .
0=.:;";='00;:-
~!~~==::!
_.c,o....E_...
.ooou.oo_
; c:::i ~-e~.o:~:;
C.: j::;c-::....~:j-
-_c.-.g~..~
",-o",,c_.::I_
~..:~~;:ogi
~ A';. a'" :;'0 ~
o!.:E;:)'....Q,
:=:=~.!.s.:.!:
-..oe -c;0"D
.;.::: E~:':ii;
.. .;.g:.)'-=....
~~_~~.; ~t'1
~;:=::...-:~:
oo..!!:ocEu.,c;u
-!_....::U.,ll:;...&
-_.0.0:;- .c
':~:'co:r:~~~
:=.-E~:;~'C;
o~==:~'Oe~
,,'=0:..._ u
;!e;~~~~~
e.: =~ S; ;o;.s~
=o_~:o:!k=
~~j;'-~~~~
~.:~ Z ~ :~=a.
~:::-;~u;.:
'~:2: o,:~~';:
,:;'U _~_..o..~~
E"D; .-o~E_-
.::r:-:-~~.sg
. .v;o.._.."O
;'D..-: &.!-:: S,g.
:s e:; f-!~- g
E~-A.ce-='!-=
=.s2~~.~A:
-
~
'"
-
. ~
... ~ ;i
GJ :.a ~
-g c .....
:::I <.: 0
.
~ GJ ,~
~ ~ 'u
cu e .g
u
'" e ~
,-
c
U J
GJ ;.i1
""
'a
'-~-
c
"*' '"c::l c: ~ of,
--g ~ a
cu ;J '2 0-
Nif.~~...
o <lJ GJ ^
"*' S-s
'" ~ -?;> ~ "
'= U;g
~~.s~.,.
o u '~ ,~
U E ~
9 B g ~
~ .g ,~ c
;:: =::a
8..;; 8 }J
~ == c "'C
i:l:: GJ~:;
E u 0
: ,g ,~ ~
o.B ;> c
o . 0
'" 0 u
N
.;
>
o
,Q
.
c-
o
..
c
u
E
E
8
9
M
.
~
u
'"
9
-
~
u
'"
,
'"
a""l
e 1
c.
"
~
.
.
..
~
.6
'"
~
.6
""
t:
:~
,
~
~
.
.
.
,=
4'
"'I
:;
!j
...
o
.
c..<a..-.~o:o.,_
0:;:~;::A"'=:
';~~-....3 '0':
:. :e=f~:u
.olI:: .;.:.....!!. Q,__"c
i:~..~~:::it
t!c;~i~.~i
"-"0- >--
-=;~=:~a~'i
~.Q,O.g..~=
'3-:!:=.; ~~.~
:;)e=~:.:~;;~
.:~o. ":g~g
.; ~o!k~ =~:'O
~:c:!:! :r::~"'i
'gC;~~:!:o.,~:::,=
....::..c:;:a.=.~ .
~OO.O__:a_
.:a.. u~:=~""ll
=O:ggau(;e
2~U:;-: e II Q,
,g..,~ :~:.::;-=
011 Q,..c:OC'l 0 0-
~:'O!k8;~.j
va:c=e_~-
'Q..2 _ ~ ~ ~;~.:
E:;.:::u>o;;!k
::;~...::;~.:
:8'c=gi$...~.:
::=";:;:.!!: ~:;.:::c.:
'::=~::t.G =-; _ =
"=-e-- u"
Q,.D ~ 0 SO 0 u.. .
.'::ou eE'Oa
~ g,:oo:::-~~-::
c.EO 1l:C:;-c ;:
c::~ o~~ t::~;
.. - ..... O.
iJ;~!::E.:':
:"gou"Qi:,J_1-
i.'c-==-_:..
~g~&5~-s~
::~_o"ae~~~
...:.!':r::a~=~
"'l
I
J
<,
'J
"
"
.
.
.
~
"
.
.
.
.
.
.
,
.
.,
,
,
-
~
<:
1
~
=
o
o
o
>
.
~
...
"
o
-=
.;
:0
~
v
'""
I
i
...
1
J
.,
i
.
-
.
>
<
.
.lI
1!
o
A
=
o
~
.,
.~
J
v
>
o
A
:~
~o
0;;
-.
=-
o~
Ai!
-0
.c
<3
o
_.2
-v
. 0
-.
..,
.,
,
.
~
'"
I
I
] ~ ~ j
>. 'e u c.l
"Q ..c 'E; -S
.g ~ .s ~
e ~ 'C
~u>~~
c -g
8 1 ,.:g 8
'"' ;g ....,g
~ ,9
3 ~
OD ,S:!
c 0.
:8 go
~ "
o F:
~
E
I
I
" <5
'5 ~
c -;;
-: ~
"
~ ~
c "
ti 8 Q
c 9 a
~ .= ~
1? -g 00 0
~ ,.:g ~ .~
.; -c -s c.;
> :; ... u
.cd c ~ -s
'" ,9 0 u
cd u CJl;C
11 ~ u ~
5 'c Q .;
C .=., :; ~
:9 ~ ~ g
'" 'e 0 >. ...I
.Ecu~]5
~,~u~e
~i~~~
I
I
.5
I
I
I
'"
~
Q
I
~
i!
I
~
"
c
:0
.C
~
.g
~
o
o
>>
c
~
~
.;
>
o
.0
C
"
..
;;
" .;
E .~
~ i
9 <
~ B
~[
"
'" ~
s
" ~
.E >>
e ;;
~ '::1
c 0
" M
s: ~
...
~
Q
.5
."
.g
.El
o
.5
5
o
."
o
"
."
-g
"
~
u ~
~ .~
c .g
~ e
6 ti
~ .~
c ~
" "
5 -5
5 .
8 ~
s ~
" ."
~ c
8.e:
~ ~
'" .
9 :e
" ~
.E 0
e 0
~ .g
" 0
a: tX
..
~
Q
"
"
>
o
.
o
0.
"
o
.5
.a
"
.5
.
"
1)
:s
c
~
"
'"
."
"
c
.~ ri
.g ~
~ B
" 0
. ."
. "
~ ~
'u <<I
~ tl
" 1)
~ :s
c
-d "
S .g
c ';;J
;; .S:
e ~
5 .
8,g
'"
~
Q
:! ~ ~ g 5
~ ~ 8 '", .:::
~ Q. .; 'E t
l!. liS "CI U ~
C oS <<> '0
o ~ 0 3 "
~ I.t: Cr.i c
!5 ._ .s -s 0
3 e >. u .~
8. c:] ~ ~
~ .~ ~ ~ ;
t '> ~ ~ :a
~~] &~
-:5 u '0 9
.~ 9 'E; :; <II
'" c.. U ... :A
5 = -5 ~.)(
> .1) iU .;;; u
II) Cr.i .c >. ...
00 "8 ... ,c c
.S e "S -0 E
~ E :: ~ u
::;; e 5..s ~
.~ <<I ~ 5 :3
gf .~ U .8 _._~=
-1lc b .-.
u .a ~ ...
5 .a.-
g ~ 5 ~
e . ~ "B ~
e: ::: !5 e .g
"'-l M !3 ~ :a
~ ~ g .~ 8
=
N
Q
.;.: :'-:'o:~g:2~ ::-.:
cc~~...--;.=gt;.!:-g,=
e f~::J -a.!:.D~): !'Q !.!.=
~~.c_'~-5~~:'O=:.._i
-.0__ co....-"'c.....
;;:'ci:':e..c):=O:.G~i
. it ::; := .. e Q ;a" Q,..: .:.!!~ :~
~':;:.:.;-!i,:';l-.:!
="':;:~~':e:~o"'i:~i
::.. - -s ~..l.:.; ..-:&; e
!=~.c:=':o-=:~==E
A -.....3 ac>.-.c:--o
J-oii-::....-~...-~il:&~
;-g =.~;& :>>~..; _ = u;..
:~ ~::.:-:.:... -::. ':'g;;,~
i.;a."Q.~"i~.5~;:e=.x
"'~i-o':::.. =.i :i-!o4:
u .. :>>> _ .:: 0 A ~ == 0 :: g~.
..'=:g.A".c.-.~':..~
0" u.....-..cJ;Q.- ...c
. ~=:f:'~"il.:::~g~~
:=~u.":.c-o-~ii.'l;I~
:a....~ e~- =oS.!:'o e ~.
:.g~= ;a..g;:~ ~ :::=.:-g
A::=~:.6u==::i&.~E
.:.:::.....s~-:'ii:;:::_oe~
:.:: == a..... :.-,~,::. = g ~
';==!:=O-:tt;:lr:1:=~.
a DC'.?;...=g 0-.......:
::a,2:'8C::O.:':;':"a(J.Q"I;II
.0:_ v o.--eo...__
a.-': -A'.:...8...,8 e 0 g g
=.0-:0-0 Quo!;. ...
=~.s ~ --o.~ ~-:!: g~~::
=~"I;IIo.g_..c-Q,...._. 0.':
A.'; :(;':....1:! :-=.x 8 u~
;:>>>040....0:; ,-O.c. .5:::-
~..::~&;;.!.:::..!~-:a:
>0.0_ -e....). .ft:e:s'O~:
.:=.a"o..!:8&:::&_:8:...u
"O:Z~_a.go,::'::~q:
C..o4.o.~c"f-..::",;
-; ~:;.. :iA&,c E.A-;:. u
41 q. =:.:~.: f':i oi~. g
tn....O..,__ _ a..:: v. ...'5 :!r
,',
~
I
~,~
"
c
"'
I
."
.0
;
;;
I
~I
01
-'
w
"
o
-
.
I
~
c
,
,
,
~
I
"
.,
~
-
;
I
,,'
"
.,
"
.
.
.
.
~
.
.
.
E
.
/
I
,
u
.
-
>
.
E
o
.
I
,;
~
;;:
;;
~
o
A
.
;;
o
.
:::
Q
~ 0
o.
-0
.!:
s.E~
g:~
~ 0
-~...
-!:! ::
-....
~-2
':0_
-~~
-.0
:..:.
::a
A 0
Cot.:~
..5'" :
E..o1
.~ ..
.....:: :i
-0
.-
..:=
o Cot_
o.,e
~~ ~
A_o
:..,q~
_00
-~~
-. .
-_ 0
g.=<::
a._
. _ '"
.s =.!
~- .
00_
-"'.
:c=~
~.-
N::;
-:.~.8
~~ 0
~i5
_A~
....0:;
r.oS.
/1f1'&i ~
...
~
Q
~
o
Ii
'"
~
..
o
~
"
o
.s
e
!E
"
o
C'
..! <Ii
:~ 5
>
] .a
~ .~
" E
~ .~
o
~ 8
:0 ~
c c
~ .g
." ."
U 0
~ i ~
> ~:I
~ 11
'" .s.
.13 ~
a .~
;;~o
~ 0 .
a~';
.0.
8~';
o a
-~.
00.2
;~-:
:&~
---
.; =-0
.e.
_0_
. -
00-
=~;
-==-
Ei:;a."
~:::
_0
:;:"0
.--
~.:"~
.- 0
~~t:
-=
...;v
~_Ei
gCi;':
- "'0
"DC
:::0
A~
j:=
_ 0_
.,..
~ .u:
- . Q"
:;;;~.:
:.~~:
l--c.
.:; ~!
.coco.
too... _.
0'0
=--3S
.o.C:oa
...;a =-.
'"
Q
~oo
CO"
:.=0
. .
o
.aO
.",.
o 0
O~=
~:::
.- >
:~ :
;;"'u
e ~-e
_00
.s-oa
_0
.A 0
f'U.
"'-;:1
-00
0" ..
;;c::.
-....
:-::-
~.::~
00
-.-
-:=:
~':..s::..
~.: c !
Q....: 0
--...
~ .ii._
.& ;:-.2
':~:.s
:;t"'o
.:j:~
0......-
_o.:g:
_O"'~
':.!!G' ;100
0- 0 0
:i~-s
...c....
00_410
::l.:-e~
_00
=.'0.1:
'C;C:'-
"-. go
'"
til
~
~
o
:!:
"'
Ii
c
'"
."
:;
~
"
..
C
"
5
5
o
U
S
~ <Ii
o ~
~ 0
" ]
'" 0
9 5
~ '"
." e
" 0
4! .z
e
"E g
<5 0
c ~
!5 'i3
'2 -5
8~
~
N
Q
=
N
Q
.8 ~
g 8 ~
:;: ~ ~
~ ::l ~ ;
~.I i ~
cS c ~ ~
~ t:: c.o.S
~ B :E
o ~ 'a
~ "
u oS e
$,l {ii a
.s -5..a
'"
:2
o
"
>
.50
5
.g
."
~
.C
.g
.
c
.
~
"'
Ii
c
"-
c
o
s
.1J
"
o
'"
.a
.
"
~
.
~ ~
.; 'u
c .E!
o "
o "
'Cl !a
:; .
~ ~ fi ~
.9 - t:: .~
C .5 's -
~ ." g ~
~
o 0 ~ ~
-a e ~ e
Q.,';;: e
~ e ::l
- '" 0
e..i :::s ~
" CI -5
o " 0
.E oS -a
" >>."
-s .:J !l
8 0
5 .5 "J:: I:
e ~ ~ ~
5 ~ ';;! "3
Q., 100 I: 0
~ .5 8 .;;
-a
ii,
e
.
"-
"
~
N
N
Q
~: i.s~,!'; a
(J :~.s :i';~:
oCO..,II;,4_':.
(J ;~.:: _=:..:;
.: Cot... · :::-:oa
-=..::...~
-o~a.:'Il;Jj =:-
c; A.u..c;:: - U'O
.. :a..= - o~:..
::~-:3~:~:
aCiQ,A a :a..:= .
Cot.._o=_s':
~~..ec':==8o
:~.!;~';Ci~:
-00 0_... ,A
':::_o~"Oo~oa
x,e':: go! ;~"i
__:. u ..0>--=
'o:...:':5;~~:
:oa..::;-!':..;
:;;; :;.- 0':: u~.:
:0';"': ~ :;~.::..
"oC. -_A 0
.:O~ ~ Q.~i~:
-...-_IQ,Q.l;v
~t:l;:.!~gi
;; ~>.~:~tJe
Me=C;~=~Q.
..:;=-::a a...~CI
~","-~ = ~ gA-S
..:.~ ~.g.; ~c;!!
~~g:t="'~':g
~__l.I_.ao:....::
ouc:<_oc;.c:."
:"'gU:t_f-&
..>.oo~:g.Q.
:~~-S:-~;=
:> 8":' ...;-==.!:i
_ _ :;;.o<<u'"
u:-: :>>o.~.:;c
-coi~~~~~!
~ ~;~ ~-;-=:'i
___A_A"AQ,
~
N
Q
,:.
=
.a
.
~
*
il.
o
.
"
:e
'0
::0
"
E
c
~
o
"
"
is
c
c
'"
~
o
'"
o
"
-5
5
.g
il
>
.c
.g
.
c
.
" N
:0 8<_
s
'" :c:
:s ~
.5 "5
6 i::
.~ e
e Ii
'" "-
oS ~
~
N
Q
:>'0__
---I:
E~~';
:..... e
;o-=~
_I:"Q.
.~::: Cot
-:=>>:;:
;:0.,-0&
_A;
c:.>~
.O-e-:: ~
- "'.
;'~.:-
_ '" 0
oE~g
=~ &,:
::j=
=~="i
0_0_
..-Ej c
- - -
.:.:.8:;
- -
.~
..0_>-
>-::a:S-
...of
.-t,;a
:.~o :
~':f.:
.....~~
:1:. c _
-...~:
: ;-:;
.0: _~....
Q,.. CI.
.--.-;
:.= ..-
~o~-o
ac::.QO
"0 -
_ 0 0
--..c;
,; i:.:
"'G~_
O"t,-
.c Q, 0 ~
... :; i:-;
...,S==:::
..8 =~:
N
'"
Q
~
.0
C
~
"
..
;;
"
5
5
8
s
~
c
~
"
'"
S
"
.E
e
~
"
0:
...
'"!
Q
_
.
o
...
;;
o
....
o
:
"
~
o
.5
~
o
o
"
l!
o
o
~
_
'"
-
.!!
;;
~
...
~
_
.
.
a
o
o
...
..
...
.
o
..
"
o
.:;
~
o
..
~
~
o
;;
--
:g
ON
~o
-~
~-
:~
i::
ou
"'0
l!~
~;
.
-...
00
=~
00
=:;
..~
.0
;::!!
.
-r:
NO
...
N
"
"
~
~
~
~
=
..
ft
~
~
'"
Q
~
..
9 oS ~ ~ ~ ~ ,- .c 0 '" 0 ~ >- . .g s . ,5 u 0 .c ~ a
,. 0 ~ ,g 0 0 :s 'i ~ oS u " 0
'i u of u 6 ~ 0 ~ u 0 U
0 ~ >- 0 .8 0 S 6 ~ 0. .c ~ 0. U "'I
<l! e ~ ,6 . 0 i2 0 ~ '" u 0
u 9 ] .c '0 U 5' -" s > . .
u u ~ ~ ~ 0 u ~ 0 0 u
'" 0 ~ u ;:;: oS jj u '= .; ~ .c .c '" 'i ,~
0 ]. ~ ~ u
,g u -g oS 0 "e- ~ 8 -E :0
;:;: 0 .c 'li 0 . ~ u 6 . '" 6
~ 0 ~ 6 u ~ 0. ~ 0 0 0
0 " e 6 0 u " u u 00 S 0 ,g 0.
0 U ~ 0 u
u 0. 0 is u Jj . >- 15 0 u & F' u oS '2 -a ~ ~ .c "
u ~ oS u ;a ,g ,5 0 0 F' '0 u 0
e '0 00 ~ of ~ u ~ .f! 0 15 '" 0 ...
0 0 'Ii, ] u 0 ~ 9 e " > 0 " 0 0 ;; '0
0. 0 .~ 0 0 00 u ,5 ~ "0 >- '0 0 u u
u '" . 0 '~ ! '" ,~ > ~ 5 Ii u 0 0
'" ~ '~ 0 ~ q 0 ] ~ 0 ~ ~ 0 ~ 0 .c ~ U
u 'CI ~ 0 ,5 u .
Ul .~ >- :!; "il U ;; !!. ," 0 'CI .8 0 0 ,5
S >- :3 ;; 0 .c ,g S :0 .c '~
a "i ~ 0 ,- 0. . e 'i u .!l 0 >-
u 0 0 0 0 .s '0 'it 0 15 . u 5 0
oS 0 e 0 {! :s ~ .8 u ,5 0 !!. 0. 0. 0 . 0. 0 '2 '"'!
.c <l! u " u oS g '" 6 .c ,5 8 0
;; . oS 'i 6 ~ 0 . . .; 0 ~ ,g u 6
u e 8. " e .8 !!. 'i ;j ;; e .5 oS 0 0 ~ ,"
0 0 0 0 :E . 'C
'CI .; " 0 0 0 '" -" ~ :0
.c " '" u ~ ~ '" . :;; .c 0 a ~ ~ 0 8' "0 0.
" ,5 u ';: ;; 0 . 0 " u ll, ;; .c 0 u
0 0 '50 0 :~ u ~ ~ u ~ 0. ::
~ '" . 0 0 0 .c e 0. 0. '~ 0. ~.
e ,5 0 e ~ u 0 0 u ;:;: 0 0 0. 0
oS ;; 0 "0 '0 . u oS ~ 0. .8 g 0. U U U 0
.c " ~ 0 0 ,~ ;; u 0 0 u " '" 0 F' .c "'"
~ 0 :;; "3 0 u " g " ~ ~ 9 0 0 E " ~ ~ 0 oS u
'" u 0 .c u ;a '~ ~ .c '0 0 ,~ '" -"
e 6 '~ 0 . e >1j " 0 0 0 00 u 'i . .::. ~
u 0 ~ 0 0. u ~ 0 a .g " ;;;; ,5 u -1l :0 U 'i
0 u 6 > u '0 . oS 0 u " ~
~ ~ 0 0 ~ .g s '" 0 u ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ 'i 0. 8' 0 0
6 ,5 ~ .c F' s ll, 6 u ~ 0
0 6 ,5 0 0 'i 8' 0 oi Ii: .
0 0 1i ;; -" ~ . S '0 0 ,5 lJ E ~ ~ " 0. 0
U ,g 0 :5 i >- 0 6 0. " Ul 0
u S 0 .; '5h ,5 '" -a u u "'I
;; .8 . " 0 ;:;: 0. '~ ;; ~ ~
0 to u ~ g 0 0 u '" ,~ ~ '[ B u ~ e u ~
u F' 6 j .a ~ 'E " j 0 F' ~ u ~ ;; u
.8 . . " [ ;; 0 ,9 ~ ~ 0 oS 0 ,5 8
'0 0 0 0
~ > 9 1i ~ 'CI ;; . 0 " 0 u . "
. 0 ~ >- '0 . ~ 6 ';: .~ :g ~ ~ '0 -" Ii ~ '" 0.
0 !!. .c U 0. :s u 0 :;; 0 . 0 ~ ~ " 'CI
.c " '" " ~ :0 0 0 u 0 .c . ~ ;; ;;: 0 ~
0 0. U " u b 0 0 .c .c " .g ~ 0 u u 6 S 8. 0 u ,
.g <: 0 0 ;; u ;;; 0 6 ~ ] 0 oS ;; ';: . .;
.5 s 0. u
'" e '5 u ] oS 1: .8 6 '0 0 0 s " ~ E ~ > " .~ u
'~ 0 u oS ,5 0 <l: >- 0. 0 0 u >
0 ;; ~ '" ~ 0 :0 5 J! '2 u 0 ...; >- 0 '0
8. ,9 ~ ~ ~ u ~ 0 0 u . " . s '[ . ~ ,~ 2 0
'" 0 6 u ,5 " u 41 "' " " 0 j 0 :0 2
i5' 0 .c ~ " ~ 0 0 I 0 e u u
0 ;;; .c . . 0 '" 0 ~ .~ '5 0 ~ 6 u ,9 u 0 0 !! ~
~ g . 0 ~ e 0.
~ '0 e u u . g u 'S 0 ~ ~ i u oS ~ 6 '"'!
~ jj :c J <l! [ 0 ~ ~ '. F' '" u 0 ~ u 0. 0.
~ F' " 0 0: 0 ~ 'CI ;; " "
'" ~ u ,~ ~ u 0 u u '" 0
VI '" r- oo
... ... ... ~
'" '" '" Q
..
"'"
;
'C"-_c_ "OC' .~"::;'oE=Z :'::''::;:'c c' . ~o::;:e'o ..
~ -= 0.0":.-0. 0__ : ...~..:: ~...
9'-::0"'&:_ -ceu ~.- &..::;;: a. :o;"';~e ...~ .,:JCc':-=...o_
.!i~: :-]j~i:;.! ::: :: ~'l:J vi-I;... u_ .:!: ""I
_ a..: :>- c .cgc;='i1: Q,;; ~ .. 0 ~"&; 0'
gaEc;~8~ 00 0
'" :: v~:' 1IC=:'o.=..2.:':..,i ~~~~~.; >>- g~u..:>O.g ~ 0
" u --. -:
" .. it u -~ :.:. -- .= g=a :'':'0.. ~~'ii .u_ -,A -=
;:;-~e.; :ro..-: 0.5 ';-~:;~':1i:'" e. ~-d~-':::uo.
o Go.......... e-- -cc. .. -= ~.i · : ;: ci :: 2~~."'=i :os!- 'i:E:-:.::~ c-
~ v . o.
-.~~-<o-': - v_ :c.=.:=...;:: oa.. _0
t gt:::~'::j ~.> >~~...: .~.'2. ~:::~ -::...~..--.. -~
-:.:.:~ i:t~e~-:i _v ~
:::;:u...:~:-= .:-::ec: ~v
"' ~ .;g~-:" -..-- -c~: .:..-:..:: E ...: --; c ~ ':-;:.'0 ..:c=o_..; 0 .
..0.... -1:... ..
,J': . .. A . c" ueo" O~:I=:.o.Q"a .2 ~ ~.:.l.! i: S".C;: .-'-:oc.::- . .
, . e...:a..- c.c e..e: _~.c-c..oa .0:. '"
..0 :,.-:.:; .:;:~o::.::: .....-..0.0 Ou :a.. 0 1lI0_lI.o..o
~ "a u.c_ o. ...c _ Uo ~ .."i....~.A::. 0
~ -- a- . 0 Q.~.. : :-~ ~~:;::"g ue.o_-=-S ~---
-; ;=o~ t~'U.:"a': lI~ . 0
& .t.-~.Q.t:::. >> ...z i Q.: ~.;'i :; 0_
.. --- 0..:) -.c v --.I:: v: .,
_:.~:~- .... c :....c..: g:;; ~':::-: _ ..-__u ..
, . 0.....'" ~oc-o ..c =~et"O~:=ui .0
" . .s:-:!.:_~.: ~o' U_:a.. ~:"'>Q. .s;~:Q.ci>o 0::1 lI.,. .....
" au_- -<u.o=a:J'S~o c:..: c. =:i ..,"aa_ ~-.:: ~=::I ...
. ~; :... :-=0 -v..._ -...-: =c~.. ...:!!...-: u '"
c; c; 0.... U,:-=:.. u.!!a .:a...&v-:~ =-*ix EiOu~"::Q.;
, 0.1 B ci.;'S:: o .... j;.:!!!'-:::lI~.-:u~" '::."CII f-e Ct.: "C
. ~~;=
'" . -u.... ."0-&0 ->.;Ct.':tuc ;"":D a .~.au~-:_':~ _ u
~ Gu: ~.~ ~~
....u e:c.:~~:c .5':~c; e'S- ~c _ o~~:;:_.:-~ . :! '"'l
~-;-::;:: :;':t ---.
" fa~~;:::':a"g - -.. '-"IClI .;:....= 1: cuo,,;.a:C-u_ c . ;
!..!!~ ~ =v"O..oc .:~-;= :i::' C.E ~ - .
..' =c ~~.;;:; "":;: Q._ A2--= = -;:e~ vc
.... ~'- :E"!t:a.ii!
~:-;: CI ~:i;-:':;=c:-e ~"'U"::IogQ.~ . .
o--::__~.3 ==.='. .::E
, g2';:.;:'U v ~:~ :;:-:J;~!~3::~ :u...s ::.:~ g-6~ ~.:... :.!!::: 0: 4- ...
" ~
, = A___ _1;:0 ~Z:;:;; c:.
s . -;::=---::e -.U= :;Qc"a=~~~: :=~~.:~~~ D:2~::E 00;: '""
. ~.6voa.::I =-= .~ t= . v c': .. A..:) t~.2 . .,2:2'; ~ ~ ~';C;"" .e~
" . .;~:~~-.! -c;-_ u...c --; -.
, . ..~.. o-::':;i"O;;V2 ~-:&:~c;:: ;-;- ~ .'; _':c.u,;~ -.
..- _c;..:).!5 '0-.= c.. '- Q,- 0 'l:lI_.c: > 2 ;t
-:;: &~~ v 0_ 00 ...co. g:;:;-=-=:o.l:
;:: :: :~ 0';; e o:"~e::::"'.;; :0..-"'- - _ eO
. i~~~~;:. :o.._oC ... -~o:e.=,.,._ ...:= __a.ovt: :0.. E~: :- '3.:. gg'":"IClI &2 ...
- ::;-vc; ~:c.g=..:,::.c ~i~~~a=. -....-- ~:"IClI~.;::";~e ....
o..o:;~:vQ. !!=: c...~-<)Ee ~E 5:: 0- '"
< Oo~~e.Ao: ~c~~:2i&~ e-f.c-.. D._V _00 v o~
u__,,; = :.0:;'- ~~~E:;..~::= ~~
< ~::g--e" _.,a 0_ te i:.,g"'u u:~ .c,,: a..c"':.
~"'.....<o(!..~ ~ Kg ~ ~...~;:!; .c.....'U - ... 0 .. 1;00-0 C .. "
- ':'e_ ...::..o::u -.::;0:: ~-.:J.o-a'" . ~~:; .. j
:: :~:~::ig..: 2:': :=-: ~"i:i ~:c~: - .
= :- N c=~-;.! 0.: ~;2:!':.51'" ~ .....
,r :;:c::~c'5: -.: u .. ...~:.!==8:::::: :.....c II;
< -.c: 00.. !:!:-<)c.ce~. ';.. ;-"5 :;:t=:~.:~c; .0
- ===:E:=.g~:- g... 2 ~ ~-_. ..--i' -g ~:~~! gO;: .- "'l
" . 2~.:::.!~.::.~ 2<.1
" < _ .. c ;~ ~=:-: g.i~ >>0_
.;a.!:=:..-s o___c __ El-~.s .....
v..... _ i:=:!!=~.I;': .....___....0): )
, . ~:;-.".::::.:~ &:~! -<-<~.:!: _"0 e~ uo_~ <~
- <Ci:-:~~-:: .:: :.11: t:t:-:.:'i .'3f *
L Q~;Qs~_ ....." . .:.g,:.~!31 ..co v:a.,. Q. <.I
-.c: 0-.. ... =i.!!.!: :~.A-:",: :=:'Sc.sgcg '0:; A - -...=-vc.. "0
,:1 . Z-!~~i~i~ -..e.. :::i;t:"i~Qe3 -~
~:-e-::. ..A :lIlQ'" ....0::_ .,.:.~g~i~~_1 .-.:a ..:.:>
: ,-..... A_ U"l_ o. ........-- ...
;Lffr- 7(J~ on ~ ... oo '" 0 - ... ~ ...
... N N N ... ., ., ., '? ., ,
Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q Q ,
I
I
~ .ll ,g
- "
~ i [
I "
'"
. s
"- " ~ "
,; ~ ~ ,2
g 8 9 >
0. _ S ~
I ,5 ~ [3
0; ~ 5
. 0 8 ~
" -5
'" '~ b ,g
'0;
,!!, ~ > >
I ~ 0; o 0
,5 ~ -5 "
"3 .2- 'd
~ '" 0; '~
0
~ " "
'0 > >
" " .
I "3 .. ~~
8 '0
~ 8. 0; ~
0; ~ "
~ 0 e '~
" 0 "
.,. ~ ~
I '~ -5 8.
~ ~ ~
0 "
~ " ,5 ..
-5 e ~ 0
~ 0
~ 'C
I " il '6
~ ~ .::: 15
~ t "
~ s 1 ~
M, 5 if
I . 'ii
"- 5 .
'"
....
Q
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
0 ~ ~ .ll ~ ~
. '" @ ~
~ 13 ~ " . 9 ,~ 9 " ~ = "
. j . ~ :;; &> '~ .t:;
e '" " ~ ~ ! "
0 8 " " '0 ~
0 '; il 0. ~ "3 ,2 '" g
'; ?;> ~ 0 0
'" ~ '" " '6 '" ,5 ij " 0 > ~ "
" 0 0 e " -5 ~ ~ ~ >
. ,~ '0 is ~ >- u .ll ~ u .
oi: ~ " ii 'C ~ ~ . tl > ~ '0 ~
-5 :g e .!l '0 ~
E .,. ~ " 2 "3 '0 '0
Ui 9 >- " " " '" ~ ~ ~ " 0 0 0; 0 "3
&> ~ :;- " ~ ~ 0. " 0
" .,. '0 -5 0 -5 0 is " ,S 8 ~
~ '0 " ~ ,5 . 5 0 8 -5 "
.... 0 ~ " ~ ?;> ~ ~ '0 " i ~ ~ -
. " 0 " 0 0 ~ '~ '- &>
'S: " il, > ~ '" 9 ~ ~ " "
,; i1 ~ e ,2 " .g '0 . :5 0.
" e ~ u -5 ~ e ~ ~ " ,,;
. " " :E 0 '" ~
~ 0 &> " 5 ~
0. . &> " E -5 il ,5 :;:
'" li ~ ~
" ~ " " . ~ " " C' .!l
" e ~ e." ~ ;> ~ :;; 0
... &> ~ 0 " " . :a
J:! 0 ~ ,~ " 0 0 . ... 0 . '0 -5 " ~ "
,5 e 0 u 'OJ
M, ,,; &> "t:l ,9 "3 ~ g oS
'0 ;; ~ " ~ &> e e ~ " 0 .g
'6 .~ ~ N '" " " " u " -5 '5 :;; 0
'" -5 .,. " 0 0
&> Ui ~ " ~ ~ .E '" ,5 e "
&> 5 " '0 " 0 . 0 '0 ~
" 13 '" e " '6 '0 ~ " " s 8 0.
:a ~ 0; '.; ,g '" 0 " ,2 :;; '3 "3 " &> " "
~ E '0 " IS 0 ,~ i1 " '~ -5 '0
0 a 0; ~
" " e i:' ~ '0 :;; g '6 " ;; ~
~ ~ e e ~ " " " ~ ,S '6 j
'" e ~ '9 ~ ~ ~ 0 ~
,S e ,,; 8 "- 'C ~
"- . . ; 'S
0 ~ '0 &> 1 '0
;; 5 ;; '~ ,; .~ - .
0; " ~ " ~ ~ . ~
" ~ ~ .!l 11 oJ '0 0
e " " on -5 :E 5 0 ..; 0 0 f'5
e '0 0. ~ '" 0 . 5 " '" 'C il ~
0 '" N ~ e " ~ ~ " ~ "
~ " . e 0. Ii is ;> '" 'C
9 ~ c M, ~ " :s ... ::0
'0 ~ ~ i1 . 0 ~ ~ 0 " 0 0. . :~
" 0. e c U oS ~ E 0 e "3 " tl
.,. . e ,5 ~ '0 ~ ~ ~ . 0. -5
"' ,g 5 5 " ~ .~ on 0 .
0 e ~ e " .ll >-
.~ - - il "' ,S
. .g .!l .!l '0 " ~ u ~ '0 .0
'6 '" " 5 .J " '6 0 0 " '0 0
. e e '5 .!l ~ 0
5 E c '0 > ?;> .8 - ~ :;. :;; ~ ~ 'C
'0 .lj " ~ . 0 . e 0 -5 '" .g .
g;,.9 " ~ 0 " 0 0 " 0.
11 . 0. " .g ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ 0 " '0
-<: ,5 ~ " ... ~ '0 " ,S
s: " 0 ~ " 1
"- ... 0 . ~ 9 ,5 is i1 ~
<= . .ll
~ ~ .... ...
Q ... '7 ... ..
Q Q Q '7
Q
/1 II 7!
~ ~
a-g
.: ~
.~ ~
00
.ff g
0'"
:a e
'" s
'0 .:a ~
b e ~
U ~ ~
" " "
;S E ~
-5 ,9 ~
.~ 1U ~
c .~ ~
,9 's
E <'l
1 ~
.5 C
"0 II
g. .S
i ~
-8 -d
~ c
~ 'S
"" .5
:2
..
."
~
8.
.... .~
~ :c
" c
e c.
c."'g
~
:!O '"
to til
" "
~ ~
~
.~ ~
:~ s
~ ;;
"
~ :s!
c
13 ~
.
's e
" "
-S ::c
8 e
c c.
~ -;
c c
.g ,51
~~H.[
~ .5 0 0
'"
..,
Q
J~fJ/7:A2
~
u
~
"'
,J:
u
,',
,
,
"
'i
"
~
~
."
,
"
"
~
."
"
"
,
" 8
~ ."
:h
~ :~
~ ';l
e '"
,9 ~
.~ ~ oS ~
's] ~-g
":: 0 . is.
.- ~ e 0
~~<t).~~~
;a u "" ..c
O.oeue"O
_ to c. '3
u .~ 0
... 5l ;j ::t
-8 .. e "
3 "'0 ~ .:::
i: a ;j
"-o~~
~ " e ;;:
~ .g u
'" .. -s u
-a ~ .~
lS5'Q'O~
~ .~ e ~ 0
cE~~Z
.s "
8 .5 '5 oS
"'0 a:E u
0:: l3:t: ~
~ ...; = as
u .... u ~
~ 53:s! .5
~
"
~
.ll
]:
~
"
5
:E
~
c
8.
~
e
.l:!
'"
..,
Q
.~
;:c
~~
. .
.c
=e
c'
00
.'=
_0
0"
..
u.
.-
.
Ou
-::
v.
Uu
.-
-.
c_
a-
e.
uO
~.c
VC
-0
C
0-
.c"
.0
..
Ou
0" .
MOV
::;a-.=
.=:
.c u~
.. "~
..
o~ :a
-.-
u. u
- ~A
Q.
c;ij":
.;;.. e
.c.
-. .
o _
.0
~A .
. ..
u~c;
c.
.0-
-:!-::
~ .
A-.
- .
~-'
.c_
~.D'::
::l
a,':"II
oS J ~
'0 ;:: ...
:t e :s
.~ .~ .5
.~ .so.
'3
~ "0
6 :a
o 0
"'g ::'
"" is
::- c
tJ ~
'8 '0
a ~
c U
" "
~ 5
o e
~ .g
5 :;
"0 C.
$I! .5
~ "
.: :c
.:a e
-8
..
6
o
6
.;
..
c
o
.~
<l!
*-
-g"'O '" '- c ...
8 0 ~ ~
:::::J C "ij '" U
]~el!~e
~.88"'..s~
~g~~~~
"0 :s :8 'S =
~"O.!l.l;!oE~
5';; < ~
~ ~Cle
o ~ :hB ..
~ ~:e . :a
"~ S 0:: ~
a .8 gj 8
.~ 8 a ~ a
.~ a u._ S:!
.= u u ~ !-S
e L;: a.:a ~
"3 'c .:a -s .;;
"'0 .~ >. 9 u
C <'l .::: c -=
u .... :::._ ...
e 0 ,s"O S
e 1i ;j ~ '"
8 > c.... IU
e~g2a
u III 0 15 -2 ~
5~..o'a~
'- .2 c.5 0 ~
o .8 .9 >. '- <1>
e ~..Q 0 :.s
..S~~~"
3s~~e..o
5~4)'~~~
5 c oS 8 :.s 0
-a:_~~;<os.;l
.5 4) 'g ~ '" e
:E 0 ~.~ ~ :Cl.o5
3: S :.s';;;-s
o
"
'[
"
5
"1:1 .s u .8
~ 's -
= '0 IS.. 6
i i .s ~
~ -i '0 ~
:. gee
..Q ~ ';:;j -;
"H g -8 .~
.:.~. "0 " 0
= t> -5 '0
~n~~~~
4) 'u ~ g c :~
e~c""~a
~ '" ~.~ ~ ~
.~;].g~;
.s .~ ~ !! .~ [
c8.s...5
o c ..
:; .~ :s
.~ & 5
'5 ~ ~
!! ~ 5 ::t
n ';:;j ..c: ,_
Q -g ~ ~ ~ g .g
(12 0 <OS l< 4) "1:1 ..0 ._
~ 0:: ~ 4) -5 '~ 4) S
';:: ,y :g -s '- _ -s 9
.~~~'~~..o'OE
~~'E.~.H "
(I2'O~'Ca~~.2C
!~a]~~j~
e
.g
1
e
"0
g
~
~
0.
.5
..
"
~
'S:
"
~
o
'"
'0
'"
';';:; 1:
~ '"
~ i
5 il
~ 0
" c
11 "0
U e
c "
8 oS
'" 5
Ui .~
c
~ t
..
'7
Q
--....
.c-.c:..=
...---
-c... >o,~
. ~ 0.0:;
:~=.... e
:C~U:;~
a..;E~~
c _ at: ..
..,- =.
c"G~.c
o.".u
.., .~4.00 ~
....;_ o.
.- -- -
':~g~.!
...._0..
CClO__ _
.2 a-:. s
~c"'!J:'"
:.!!~.2~
.:...,.8';
c..uo_
. ~;: _.a
_ "-;:'0 0
-..c~c
u UClU
"'='lCII_:O-
U ;J--.
A_.=.
..c: g.c E_
Au'" u a
...a .o.c
_o;c~
5i=::
a._uuo""
. ~ :-=...
::=u~a.
:~.; 5~
~:'22=-:'
C:V_::II~
;~o~;:
&::-
~ e".8:
~ v':O~
;:,:-... ::II
-~...O::
: o.e 'G ....
-ce...::B
. 0- o.
. '5~ 2' ~
...c:ll:....a
_:SQ.o
....
~
,:,
~ ~
U .~
C "
~ '"
j~
~ .:
i~
.5 :B
~
" .:
'S: g
~ C
~ j
~ g
:.s CQ
'" g,
til "
u is
5
c
li ~
:( '0
::-
U
"
~
"
,
.8
~
..
~
'"
"
[
~
S
.ll
"
'"
"' '"'
.., ..
Q Q
;;
~
~
ft
o
~
- "
O.
-~
:~
u_
.';;
_c
;:&
'-
-.
-a
=..
~.!
c-
o;
u"
-=.
u.
Au
.=~
-A
'=
;'i
ou
oS;
.0
o.c
A=
00
.:A
.u
::
A.
-.
..c
.-
..
~c
.:=
.&
--"ll:i
.aC
c;..:~
:.; ~
-A"
~"'i
:.~:
.:! 3 ~
.c".
...;=
~.c
ftca
':'at:
l~
~ .
e ]
~ ~
~ .5
rs "0
'C "0
.~ ~
II g
:3
~
8.
"'
~
,:,
-- -....
0<:10..::;.=
c;c..._
~!.g . a
~ u~
~~j;1
:;;:';;:
-.3": :=-
'Qu-,,_
l.:ni 8,:::
:-- _'lI:lI-U
E~!.e :~
~~~~o;
u.: v'::': ~
;..2'Z~= .
Q,Q,-;a ..
~::~..;.s
-- ~- g~
.0 a __ u
=c.:;I_ge
.:o~=:o-.a
A'O= 1:_
.:::~=g:
..~ =- -g~
~;-=;'::2
: ~.: ~~'E
~ ~:; -=:~
- -A 0":_
:'=uJ:J::..s
'lI:lI=';~~.E
e::! ::.::::
..e goQ.':
u~=~.!_
.:u~~::
I--J-::;=;-
N-.o:::J: __
::::;::-=~
e 0- O:s
~--.a~;
:s-.. ...
~ .:a:~s
..I:~" >o,vg
.:~-:~ i-s
!!;i-;;.i
'"'
..
<l
~
. .g
.~ 0
" l;!
e ~
u .~
5 "
~ c
o .~
E 9
<
.
.s
.~
l;!
'"
'0
e
II
~
c
:r "
-g g
.ll ~
t) g ~
<l! ~
o is ~
Nee
~
"0
~
..
~
,.,
:a
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
>
.
~
o ::-
" U
'2' 4)
0.5
'0
~
~
~
<l!
~ 6
" ."
~ ~
c. ~
<: :s
B'O
c
.s .~
9 "
u
:a 6
c 0
~ "
c.~
~
[
.5
~
:E
."
~
c.
e
o
o
..
6
'g
e
Ii
"
~
"
"
'E .~
~ ~
.: C
"
11
~
.ll
:c
"
c.
....ClUU_u"c
gg:;:-=~~
;;:~:'o ..:
=~~Q,~=Q-=~
_a'--J:a---=
.0::;: ==~
-ill: :;o,,::IQ,-"
;;...~-:.:-Q,..::
- ...u 0 ...
- '.!:iio..:o...I:
~~Q,---.CI--
J:J:e-:a:;o,,-ut:
.c;::.::::.a~oo
.2'::.!!~';'lCII:;~
i.s~~:ri=u:"
-=u:==. ~::;
:i.!l.. ~~.: :-=~
.. a':~~.2"=:
-.: ~ :~-:E ~.a.
~'::~u~oi~~
2.:;::-:--::-:'a;~
:a : ~ ~A:: :i ~ ;.
..c"'-uoQ.E~-
p~:'5c!'lI:lIo::
_~"''U=c:-.e
:: Q,'Q.-:;-.-
=~a,.;oo_a~
"s: :~~.:::~
~j-!o::"c~~
- --.::.~= g;--:
&~~e;i~-.;:
uClC"O 0-0=.CI
:~ e :..e!',X-!.;
-= ~.:~ - o~:-=
e.:.?:g~~:=-
:;! -..: =.:!"c~:ii ~
,g-s':_:=:;:-,=
;; c:"~ :~;;;'o:
.; i~ ~ ~~'ai g
<OQ- _Q,cO,,-
c: Q,~ _.-'0:::
.. :~~:c~;:~:J,
o ... CL__ a 0 0
... --. & CLQ,.c.c
;.~c.~ ~e ~ J:
'<>
~
,:,
~~
:-:.
c';;
0.:
~-
i~
~.
~
~"
:~
C.
".
~i
".
."
oS~
"a
. .
.c_
:~
..
-=:
~&
"0
:.:
:2
~=
;~
.:a
'-
~.
o~
.;::
.2"=
:.~ '
c.
:.s
45:
...;
ft_
':';:i;
..
..,
,:,
u
.g,
e
c.
c "
~ -S
M :g
~
.g
*
.
~
~
~
e
o
<:
"0
. c
e'o <'#
o ii E
ii e ~
..e 0 u
~ oS ~
;:! 'O:I:
~ ~ .~
-S ~ E
~ .s
2. e
.5 .g
'"
c
'C
II
c
.~
"
5
'"
c
!i
"0
';l
,.,
Q.
c.
;;
'8
1:
"
"0
c
;.8-E
- Sl :E
..a -;
...
~<
....
..,
Q
--. ".
~:'!.:~
_c_ Q,.
=0 c:C1C S
... o...~i4 =
2;.~.. _
'g;!~~;e
:c~='2
- A &
-. =-.,;...
"" a.... a
':J!~;~
'Qo...:.l
";:o':u
oc;o_:
-;0.=;..1:
",-.cc'Q
~ a....,::i
~:~=; ~
o;:iA.::
"I;>::J-
--;:et.::
-D.o_o
~~;!g~
---:...
::~O<<l;
&,J:: g,g ~
~~c~~
-.8a.-"'O
t:_ouc
=.:!:
:~:.xg
:!,g';-g;
t:~ ~:
:~3~u
-_ 00.0 .
A__va:;-
_I:ou-t:
o';:A'Q Co
:=-=~~:
:;~sg~::
:C:~~.s;
:::!=;g~
..~iQ..8':
'"
~
,:,
M
"
.~
.~ ~
~'"
-
..
Q
-e:~.!!
::J 0:"_
'; Q...C;.
:;;==::
"a.... u"'O
_.... D'"
:a.D":
.-Sc.
.! gi';.~
c:;;.. ~
.2.....:&
:QO_
---::.:
=<a=.-
Ii. c; -..
..-i t!=
i gou..':
8'''~:'''
~.:::..
"'0--""
--.. -.
E.~~~:
~-: :: A:
::~"o ~
~.::::; u
OA.
::;~:
~::II= II ~
-.... Q,
i:!=.= .:
!-:~ cl:J:
.. ~ 0 - e
~...;~"o=
':'!. e e.
Q.- _ -::J"
=:.A:~;e
::c... ~ 1;...
-:-=:;g]'::
-.. ....--
. --on -_
-=ii.:.ig
.<...- . eo
0:.-;. Ill...
~;"O 5 : =
.::::E-::::
-
..
,:,
...
~
.g
II
~
~
S
'"
~
c.
.5
:;;
"
II
8.
S
"0
"
E '" ""
~ .::: ~
~ ~
~ "
" ,;,
e "
c "
~ g
~ ~ .::
.;:: :.a. ~
.; 0
J:l '0 u
'0 e ~
~ ~ .s
~ .~ 6
c ~ ~
" "
oS -5
~
~ ~
.8 2
'" '"
c c
'2 'c
.n
"'I
.~
~j
::-
...
,
,
J
"
~
u
..,
~
l;!
.8
u
.g
~
.
,.,
-a
o
"0
'3
o
~
"0
C
~
"0
~
'C
o
<5
~
c
o
c
e
~
..,
.,
J
5 9
c c
.9 .g
l;! ~
E E
~ .E
..5 .S
"'!
,
11::.. >0,-
o_~o
v"OC
:0-.... ':;
~~':E
=:;-~
"i~"o~
;~~:
0_-_
-= .;'e >0
-us-
:;~O
uS: ..
..I: v_u
-"'QiJ
:~~~
:..:'0
ti.2c!u
"'.! c::
~D':~
-..-
"; - .8
~......
~:t~
u.
u c...._
"cou.
-.. ....1;
o Q,Q.-
-0"'0
~:::.
.- a.-
Q,Q -....
~ c::: ~~
c~ g..~
.,g... ~
-0-..-
~~i~
--- .
-U. ..
~ c.
~~ 0:
o ~ u
c_ .
U 0 :'0'
o~~A:
%_ ....c
. ..
_ c C
"" -....
':d!S.
'"
..
,:,
.,
.,
\
,'1
..,
;
,}
""!
..,
.,
"
,
$
,
..
1
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
e ] i .s
.~ ~ .s
'0 ...: !5
:0 'S U
~ t: .s
u
~ ~ ~
"s ~ ~
:a 0 -g
g 1-0 i1
'l::l U l.l:
~ ~ '2
Q 0 ,",
~ ; fa
8 >."t:l
'0 t:: e
c 8. ~
,;:; e jg
u '" 0
Q U
2' ~ 'g
'" ,-
1..:: Q .:3
6 ;; .-[!!.
.s '"
.
.8 '0 <II
U ::-:s
~ U 'a
"E u a
'0 oS .~
o ~ 0
o 0 Q
o e
'c g ,g
's.. -; Cl..e
o :>- ._
'"
..
'"
"
/~f/,7 3
~
Q
.c
l<
.
*
~ 9
. U
's c
.g a.
a.:!
'0 :
o <ll
Q e
~ ~
> .
o ...
e '"
""
a d
~
~ .
~ :s
'';( 1:ll
Q 0
'"
"I
"
"
O'
,',
,
,;r,
C
,
~
.~
,
~
.'
,
~
c
"
"
,"
;-1
i
,
'"
~
.
Q
'0
&
'"
...
.g-
o
::;;
9 .~ <Ii
il ~
Ii ~ .
:s
~ ri .5
9 -
--g ~ ~
. 8 e
g,-
[i~
.8 - 0
~. 11
'0 _ .
:J .5 -
~ ~ ~
& "" Q
e u ~
~ 6 ~
:s i ~
o
.~
o
.g
~
.9
0;
U
'"
::;;
.!l
'0
i
~
~
o
e
9
.e
""
a
o
.
0:
]
o
Q
"
~
>
.
"5
.c
U
'0
~
iJ
.!l
.s
.~ M
e g:
.~ -
s
U
o
'~
Q
U
~
o
:E
c :.0
.2 .~
9 0.
~ 6
o U
8 ~
~
o
~=a
>>.c
"5 U
-. :.c
o ~
o 1A .s
" 0
8 e :E
a 9 ~
c '3 ~
'E~a
~ 4' Jl
.~ :: .$
~ .( .8
..,
'r
Q
~
~
;
.. .u u
&,0=-= ..
:;--:
c_'U...
..0
'O-~~
-~ -
~..:;:
'..; ~~
u...._
i:':::
-c"':
c;_c;o
o 0"
~~o2:
:~"Qo~
--''0.. =-
:A:":;i,
"CI.. ~;""'"
:,.:-:
~.o iu"i
-:": ,.;.
~Q4.A-e
.:::1 ..~-
..::;:>eJ.
... 0 1.'0
.;.::;~:
c _....
i:':-o ;
~ :o~ a
;~-:=
_.-:.c :.
~i~J:
:i.oa~:
...:'-:::1-
...,!; 0:
.'-:.:0& ill A
_.~u,&:
~"'c.;"::
~~:; ~
_ill:.Ao .'0
~o:.i"&
a..:: $:. .. -
0..- c...
o:r.o.. >.
t-o";:';":'V
....- -
~~~:~
.-.}i:~'::
~
A
..,
::
~
o
U
~
i
U
:;;
l:
..
"
.
.
o
-::.~
:;ll
- -
OU
...-
..,
~..,
o.
:;..a
::
o~
Ee
.
.
:
.
.
.
~
.
.
<
.
.
.
"
~
~
~
o
..
o
~
~
:;
C
.
.
.
,
.
..,
..
6
'"0 ~ ~
[ a ~
. oi
. c .
.~ e
~ .s
~ [
1
0.
5
o
g
~ ~
~ .s
Q >>
~ .,
~
~
o
g,
.
.8
s
;;
'~
..
..
'"
~: "0
:~ ~
~:~ :;
~':.i ~.-
.c-.::
~..a" .;
~:~
-0':: ::
,:e:; ii
::~i
~~:
:'X.:
_0-
- --
0..0
~,..
;2~
.;.:~
" ~-
..,.-
..0
0';:"-
":u~
;: >>";
~:~
_.c
0" 0
~~:
:'s.!;
c:E:i
00.
Q-
~. .
0"::
-0
...
~..c::
&~:
__ 0
-..:
-=~>o.
.g~~
C.-
i~i
o-e ~
%~,J
~-
i;-o
..-
0-
-..,
..,~
~.
-.:
"u
e=
- 0
-e
0-
.'"
,,;
- -
~u
:.
_'"
--
0-
......
u"
llC=
_c
~u
. .
~ 0
..
..
6
g
&
>>
o
."
tl g
Q
'g'r--
0.15
,- '"
.s ::>
,!!
~ '"
6 ..:
II ll,
U il
~ S
..( i
.; 0
> U
.~ :a
E .~
!l
;;:
.
o
Co
tl ~
Q U
'g' .~
Co e
o Q
Z .s
.s 8
~ II
.~ '[
.
o Q
11 :=
;; 0
""
.
8
~
o
o
'8
o
0.
. .s
e '~
~ ~
~ ]
"5
il
:sl
~
.~
9
~
;;:
>>
-9
..
Q
.s
U _~
's.. c
e .
>. ,~
5-a
.s g.
.~ j!
o ...
.~ on
=' .S
~ E
~ e
o >>
] ~
~ .c ""
g '" e
t ~.[
~
.
<ll
~
_ 0
.,g c
o e
Q
< ~
.
-e
.
,~
"5.
0.
.
Q
~
.;
~
~
] ~
B til
1.!l
...; =-
- '9
til '"
a ."
~ ~
o 8
.:::: 0.
o "
e .S
>>~
::; e
U 0
.~ .~
'0
.g
Q
.s
~ .s
o 0
'::I ';a
I ~
""
,!l g
'0 ~
6 ~
'C 0
g '0
] :.0
<IS ,~_
.5 -
tl
Q
e-
o.
~
.s .
.~ ~
:a 'C
'" ~ ,9
] ;; ~
p 'a .g
~ :E 'a
..r= :.c 8
~ .~ 0
II) ~ c;:
.c Q ,
~ ..s 0 :E
8 9 ~ :s
CJ:I c .g 'in
'E .g ';;l S
'id 8 ~
Q
.s
"
lJ
0.
,5
"
-s~
] :e
. 9
'" 0.
. e
~ 8
'"
'r
Q
'"
'r
Q
,~
"
.c
~
~
U
'6
,9
.
Q
.c
~
o
U
"
o
'9
'9
"
.s
'~
>.
"5
o
o
o
'C
.
j
o
~
It
9
.
.
o
.~
o
~ ~
:a 'u
.:!
""
o
.
.a
u
>
,g
.
'"
..
.. "
~ .~
o
g,S
~ .
'" '
.9 .e
~ i
~:~::~:t.~:;j~~:
e-::'; .:]..c-e;::~::~
- ~- i e ""'0 - c:: ~.- '1:1
~ _ 'V u- :.: c ue _ v "0.';
u-=o_~ ...._>-...Q,O
.. u - u C,Io~" _.. g"..a....
...:.e..-... e,,:...l::a.-u
...~~~~'2-0=<O...A:
.~Q..9:.::s......'Su..a-'"
v-,:"::o.U;s 0,000'=->0.-
_ 'O;:&c:r~,.;...il:a-A"
..:. .:.--uc:r;:.....:
a.~.a~,...,Il:.:c_~-"Ou
; ~u=.A~~:~.:~i~
o. ","O_'O_U.._ 0 ..
-;::i:a".e-; .. ..c_:;u
"_e&_o"'>o:Co.oo~
:.,.. v- .-:'c..--E-:::~
.u~s;._, _eo:- 0-
48 _:I.., Co;' v-.....~ ....c ...
_:~-;~o-=-c.-:'::.c
.,t:;.'..=.- --00. -
:u_~':;~-Cl~ a::
=g,:=.. I'; -;- ~3:-S',,-
_ ..... _ .. .. .. -,;..... - ~ :II .II
: e ....&:; ~-S.~ ; oS ~-:.-:-=
..-= 1:'"o~;;.= ic:': !!..~:~
':!"=.~E..:~_.!.!.=A
>0 ~-=... ..c".l;o.c>-.
;, 1:__&.2;~: o.!~~!:,..e
o~;; ,=: :.:~... :Z'tO:'~
~o-n2"i :~:';~i=*'=:
-e.CI.& _:g '; !.! -i:-:; 0-;"
..;~"O;...~J,~':_c-:ic':
c:l-;'_C_".l;"",-j~~"o-
~OO"O..2_;:':"'_~'~.Q=_
g.~j'.::c....1!!.:;~..a.';oe~
E...OO_ ....cEa.c":'
gi~~:;~"'~::-:-:--:
c::e~>.... -~..~-~-t..
~_iii~o~~:;=~~..c:-=~
-v C_CI ~-,
:-:.z. ".2 _A.D -= a _.~ ~ . ~
__ &=-o~=.......u:o,
_. .-::~;:-:s"Q"OOo..~o
:;:ei~.; .2g&;:~':ce
....;:..!!<Q~::.g:.:.-~:
_...c':-e.o,A:I_o.c"Oe.:
.. IE co .. - - .. ..- -
---.. ~~ =,:::-.:
-;;,..._"O.:::._c-
_>i:'O-..~"
=:~E ~~:~
~c.ao:e.o""Z
.. ::.::::::..~o"C.
u::3I: -a2:i:
: :t;..a~.c;';
."o:;v=.'O
.A .co.c.o....
--:~~:~=
';c.-O.. ,
oe~ ~~~~:,-
..'O;I....c
oa-;: c._O--
-==:'Og~o~~
!_:"-5C1~-;.
.. c:: __ 0..... c
o-;:-:'G .;~
.~;o. -'G.>-:t::.
.&.....-::.'lO .. o...~
... :~:;=~"il
.... . ...:. ~:.... e
;::~~:.!~=-c.~
:i:"i~...:.~:.:::
~....!:.D~O~
==~>>o~~..!c;
~~"i-: o.~ ~ ~~
:E=.:=e~:~
.._,,::;_~~:::u&
..~.=.,;o_:II;8
Ci~~::~~.!u
~o_o'" -.....
~e.~~eZ;eo
... - G - .-
::i. =2.:::t
j;.. Ii': Q,~.....
:.f=~..~:~=:;
:..':-o-t::J=-
..~".:.g...c.~
~.~~.c.......~
_ _ 0 IS Q.'G" .c
c~3I:=~c~!:
o:u.o....co:
"~"'~..."6a
1:~ e&.;.J~g,
I
~~
-.
.'
.'
.
_6
o~
"0
". e
~:
...-
.~
.-
-;~
.-
".
GO
. -
. ~
00
~.
-~
Go
..2
:"Q.
~o.
00
;.';
.
,,~
A
'"
~
6
,..,
o.
~.
=e
-,
'0
o.
~.;
..
.2'
0.3
..-
<-
...
o
<:~
90
'"
~
6
,..
..
6
,..
..
'"
L-
'"
~
6
~i
:a Q
" e
e e
Q 8
~ e
.,
g ~
6,..
-g ~
. .
~ '"
'" ,,;
6 .
r--: B
6 Ci:i
..
.;
U
. .
~ 0..
o Q
~~
~ ::;!
"" ""
o .c
. U
t.tl :E
" ~
~ CJl
8. -s
0. ~
." e
sa ~
~ e
e ~
~ 0
. 0
... Q
Co .s
~ rl
8 ~
:g '5
g .,
~ ~
,~ '8
'i! 9
8 5
Q U
~ ~
~ 0
;.:::: f-
;.s
~ e
0. Q
5 :D
Que
p. .5 c..
!-' --; o:l
o Q
.g .c
. ""
e "5
~ 8
, "
Q 0
!i
9 ""
.s a
il
o
g
!l
.g .s
~ ""
;> a
.
"5
.c
U
'0
~
iJ
""
o
.
o
"
Q
o
C
.
'"
~
o
~
iJ
"
9
U
.:!
.
o
8
Q
e
o
o
9
g
""
""
"
~
'il'
.8
e
'"
..
'"
.. Q
...1:1.
__0
-~-
0_
0- 0
..eo.
~o
...eI
.--
.0.
:l_=
_h
C _'lO__
.0.....
=:;~ &
~~:!~
0_ __
..-'-
G g,:se
- c......
~ 0- 0
:,:;i
_Co..c
o~-= -;
....
~z.&.:
. o~-
e..........
..~o
i.~~.;;
! ~~.;
._.c
u _.All"
:.-;
Q,~-O~
-.0-
:;=c:->-
->..';,Q.
c...c
o..,c. .-
::: ~
=::;=
o -
E a.--""
o.c~
_.....,c.
j-ei
ui~~
A...A _
to--e-
.- -
:;.~:;
:9 ~
Q 0
:s ~
. .e
~ ~
:;: 1=!
.
.~ ~
.s
'"
. .
0. 5-
e e
o .
~ <.)
. Uo'"
:;;
'i .~
o e
'" Q
~ oS
g e
~ ,g
c
.~
ll,
o
8
...
:s
o
.~ ~
o
~ o:l
o B
.s .
~
~
.
8
U
.
Q
.,
8 sa
"" Q
~ :> -g
~ ,: :.a <<l
tl ~ sa 8
~ ~ ~ ~
CJl 1=! CJl
~ ~ ~
Ufl.
.,~
ov_
0.0 ~
-_0
l:0:J
o :.~
0"
:.:Z
O~U
G-~
.--
Qu_
v&.':
...u-
-A ~
:'lO =
"i~2
_o~
~ _ G
;;~<
.-:; -
G_ ~
0',
00_
_DO
~..
.= :J
- 0
. "..
u~
. o~
-;: .0
~ti:
- ~ -
uoo
=~-:
'" -
QO
_o~
~..-
--~
eso
.....~
0- .
z.o
. .~
~o.3
-....
_~o
--..
ii....i
.c."
..-
oii::i
- ..
CC
_00
~e~
'"
..
6
<=
'"
6
""
..
"'l
....
,
..,
/L/A~7Y
"'l
""
:j
-I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
c B
;f 'e'
'"
~ ~
6 :;
~ -;
c ~
.9 0-
~ ~
u a
> "3
.~ 0
E 'i!
E .
< -a
~ .~
.., .!l
" 0
tf :.is
.~
!\.
"
>
~
oo~
.,. 0
6 13
'"
~ 'c
~ .~
8. .5
~ -;
s i1
" "0
~ '3 .
~ ~ .~
~
")
Cl
u
>
."
.
~
;;:
"0
o
.
.a
"0
~
-5i
.
..
o
~
..
e
u
>
o
""
.
'"
,.
Q -'
.. 0
-g ;f
~ ~
.,.
6 Z
..
..
s 6
" ."
~ ~
~ .:l
...
on
Q
'"
"j
"
,~
"'
".
,
,
"
,j
.,
~
"
,
~
,
,
"
.,
"
.
.
.
.
.
"
.
,~ ..
: r ~
)~A~71!
15.
u
o
a
o
.
~
]
-5i
.
..
o
~
..
e
~
.8
.
.,
i
s
"
'"
~
'"
on
Q
~~1!
0. ~ :~
s ..
t) ~ .8
-s g "0
o ~ '3
" ~
e e
a: ~
. E
~ S "
_.>'.._ ~ c >
~, t.:i 8 '::I
<<I p.... ~
u "0 0 t:
8 <II 8
~ ~ ~ ";
e .~ 0. '"
>- .5:S
:a ~ -a b
.0'0
.8 '0 0 3
g q ~
il~]
~ ~ ~ ~
- 50 il 0.
.5 e co ~
;; :g ~ ...
'g 5 6 ~
8 :t: =I:. ";;I
~ .5 ~ D
u ~ ~ ~
~ ,so ~ IS
:;
-5
"0
u
>
'0
"
...
on
Q
~
.
-
;
....__u
.... u_ .
.:~.!a.
u - f Q,.e
...:>> Q,E u
u. 0-
:._!U~
u.:-;:..
_ _A~
:c;.':'O.
:.:- c:.
~i=:!.J
..-..:;I.
=>>.... 0..0
- Q:;): 0
-:.>u-
~....... :
~-: :o~
~.=.Q.
~g c~ ~
.c - ---
=-:':3
e:.....-c;
':-;i:vE
;aue_
::.~ :!~
-i:'U"CIiiiO
>-..occ_
c.';~. u
Eo::o.. ~
-:;.;:e
.:.~.~
;g~:I>.:
..:.11=1-
--00:_
u...... ...f:
~.Q>o..!
D-.c-.
o__c...
_~... 0_
u 0"':
...- -..
-,.- o.Uo
e:~:~
:-=~ ~ =
.c u u"-
:::--;:;
: 0 >0:;
&"0_.. 0
~= -:
o ~~:;-
a _u o ill
:
:
.
-
:
.
.
.
;
.
"
.
~
.
0_
..
.-::
;5:
.
0_
-~
0~
~.
0-
-
~u
-,
(j..
.~
..-
--
o
g~
~-
.-
-.
-c
~-
0>
E-
E:I:
o
.~
~~
--
0=
....
~-::
-;3
000
~w
;~
~;ci
---
_'C
o~.
....-
':0'1
--=~
.:;-
~".:
.
=ae
E ,
~ .0
:~~
"- -
0.., a
...-
:;c'Q
_~o
~.,
- .
0-=
~j.a
'"
'"
'"
.
:s
': .S
,5, ~ "E
e t; e
>. r.:l 0
5 0 ~
s ..s u
"'0 .5
:; ~
~
o
>.~
a .
e 6
"0 ."
: ~
. 3
~ ~
on
on
Q
.". '___G
';;..~=5
oQo~ .
~.I:Iu-=.
<)0"':-=
==~=-
~ .~
2!-=.:~
.:i:=i'i
-...:.-...
" o~
.>'C"'.
'.;:~:--=
ou ,.t;_
-=:; i.:-:
g::C. 0 ~
:: :;:.~ s.;
.-,
..0&0=
..0"00":-
--..:;-c;
..:a_.,.e:-
c;""''::.c:
~,.,~): ~
~.,,::::: g E
: e 0-;:: a
'-.... .
~: : =.:
:: a.-:~.c
c:. -.s_
.- Q
- -.0_ II:
o.svo.!:
1:1_..:__ .
Q,_c.c
.!.o:gg~
.. >.c; &-1 0.
SiiiO" ;.g
J: 0 ..:-::..
~.:=...:~
:;....... .... u
.. c:-~_
..... _ c_..
-..;.. -0( ~
Q.E~_o
e.Evo-cc
~ ii.-!.E ..g
.&.o.~;:
.I:;:.:;
:!. _::S Q o-
woo _A::S
. c.c _ _..
~
"'
Q
....
on
6
.~
.C
So
..
~~
o c
~e
at:
~E
-.
-=;
0-
--
~.
-..
..-
-..
~-
~..
:l"
'c
.'
.-
_00
~~
~~
~~
c'
e~
.C
.-
c ~
0.=
w-
Ae
- .
o
c.
0:;
~=
. >
E~
E.
,..
M
~
u-;'
Co
;t"
:;.
~f
;;
:::.2;5
. .ft
..
o
'6
3
.
;;
o
>.
o
.
e
u
.
e
u
-5
>.
'5
e
'C
'"
...
on
Q
co - - 0
.z::'Q:a-
:~.8~
00.'-
_-.:i
c;.8;..c'c
=~it;::
:. :ti':
c 0,.. 0
Q~O-
.- ~
~..
"ICI 0"';;;11
."'_0
-_0-:
_e.- ..
=~v.o
~~-a~
:'Q..:';
...-
.;.-c;
_-;::...... co
~~:.;
..~:: ::
v --..1:1
.:::=~.:
-.....J:
-"':0;
,-.....
O..'au
,Q .. .-=
:~-=;
;::t,.-::S
Ou ~ &
~ ~-:.:
=~~iS
~ -
~~ECU
"ICI'" ..'_
e~:;~~
- u 0._
.:'O::su~
..c -e.l:ii
.u..!: 0 - Go
2 v 0'" a
E.D-O..
a'c _.c
o~u.c,l_
~;~i"o
...Eo~ :
....:!,:uo
.....<C~-e
'"
"'
6
;j\
Q
u
-5-.5
~ 0
o .
.9 1
ti ..g
'S u
~ ~
S
3
;;
E
o
'"
.:
:~-~
. ~ .
);'" ~=
e:"';::
o"'oA
_v_
-:J--
~:~.:
. -
----
c_ .
oc,l:"_
U e- C
",.='i
~-:-
_...o:;U
:=8E
s: :...:
: ~A ~
.a.K~:'"
...u.",c::
~co
V c'"
'II:i_.=-A
c.:=a.
-~ ~
~;;::
'gii: ~
::~ ~
.._ ::;,C
~Cli;""
oE-O
.c",:~
;I: a... 0.
--:':.ce
._-...
~~'::::
~ o.,c'I:lI 0
.- E o.c
":i~ ~~~
-,.
11:0,0::;....
...:i",-oS
.--
:~ g;'o
'O:i CI 0._
...-..:=
~_5: ~~
- >-.2.";
E2=:c,.:
. _;:: - CI
--.0 G'-'" =
. C.
_ _:0.._.
.o~:E;~
...
on
6
..
~
-
:
=
-
~
~
o
~
.
.!!
.
..
..
;;
~
o
e
-
~
o
::
.
C
::
~
~
o
.~
~
-
..
.
;;
11
""
.
.::
.
~..:
oC
Z~
.
-~
. ~
-.
"'
on
Q
~ 8 ~ "i
. ." 5l 0
u 4 .... 't:
l:: c ~ *
~ ~ '2 ·
5 a .g g
e ~ ~ "
Q,"TJ 0 8-
'" ; fi ~
'0 .... e "0
e f :::
u 3 U .S
-a. ~ ~ CD
5 e ..g 8
~ c .... e
c .9 oS
'" !.~
.E :~ ,g .g
"0 9 ~ 0:
9 ..:! 1il ::t
~ :J C
c E 8 ~
8 .s ~ :i
~ 9 F
u 15.
· E
~ ~
.0 CIl
It: .$
'0 u
o :ll
;; ]
u ~
e. u
::! -6 '" 1
~ "3 ~ u
en e .s ClI:
j : ~
"9 ~ ~ ul
.~ ~ ~ .c
g u .~ ,~
~ ~ ~ .~
6 U ....l It:
o.gr .=
c ~ .!:l 5
'0 :t ~ .~
~ g 11l 0
:a ..:.ol B c
'" >. ~
.5 1; 5' ~
U :: <? .e'
'" ~ co ;) Q..
... 0 u ::t' .s
u CIl ..9 ....0
:a c oS
..:! 0 ~
." 0 .~ H
;; 9 ~ ~
c "0 :.:: CIl
.~ a] g
o e . .~
~ ~ s >
.5 c ~ a
'0 -8 8. a
CD CD.J:!
.~ O:a '"
g ...: ::I E
~ ~ g ~
.s t .j ~
c as ;S "0
u> :t '" .;:
"8. 0
o S a..
....
on
Q
i:u~~
ue_~
Eoo,-
-- .
.....r: -.,c:;
:.: ;00.,-
.,. ~,ji.:
~=.!);
-~--
L.:; _~
o o-u~
"VA_
2o'-.s
~- ...
"c::--
~ ~:~
...c c
:e;;C-!
e......-
e~:& =
'-..ou.c
c -::);
!.8:g
e:;:-=
~ ~= ~
~ Q >o.~
,~ C
~~~:
~:o,.::A
....-< l:
-. -
g': ;0:.:
-:: .-
;:c;oJ;
...;: _ill:
..~ .
:~ ~ri
..r:ClI~~
"=..cf
...~ - Q,
~=-;~
v:':... _
...-.. -
g~=~~
.!"!~;Q.
':_-):.Q.
NZ u~:
.09&,,29
....
"'
Q
~
~ .
o .
o 0
'J:! .,g
[-8
o .
~ e
. ~
.
~
o
::
~
.
..
C
~
.
!i
::
.
-=
~
-
~
o
-=
C
- .
>.
. ,
...;:
-.
:~
;::c
~:
~g.
..e
-0=
:!.a
we
".
~.::
- ~
~:;
.-
.A
'f
0",
~~
..
-5~
-
.-
;;0
z;
"
~.3
.,
on
Q
" 0
u u
. ~
j
u
6
>.
u C
'0 > 0
~ ~ ~
<u e c
~ :J '~
C ~ u
"0'" ~ ~
~ ~
'" 0 u
S ~ ~
o
o
" 0
u ~
(: :;;
. "
S; .g
~ 'S
:;; €
;; 0
u '"
e '"
o 0
e ~
';;: .9
c ..
u e
" 0
" .:!
~
e
u
-5
,,;
;;
u
e
e
'0
C'
e
<
g
u
~
o
o
o
's
-8
..
6
o
.Ii
o
::>
"
'0
~
~
u
'"
>.
.
is
.~ ~
li u
-5
] 'S
~ ~
o ~
8 ~
.,
on
Q
'"g .. .. .
'g ~ ~ ~
"0 ::I ;:0 e
: J ..: c;
:: :; -; ;:
A 0 ~..;g,
- .;: Cl ~ 6
. .--.-
.a _ uO
Cl : -: A:
u .! . u >-
e. . .a~;;
. A ~~=
Q, ,. =_..1:;
Q ~.5~
. ii .-.: u
..! J! ':E~
3~': -e....
- _'"' :0 3"
::J-: ~ ~... 0
..u .0:
!~.1 2-U g
~..- A.o-
u ~ g ~g=
t:. i= ;jj;] e
: 11:" 0- Q,O
.....;u.;2:.::
Q.~"''',,=~
.co~e"Q_
e..... -~c;
~ :.g :~ :..:
-~...c-_-
~.&:.:Jic::;::I~
....;o.eEo~
-.!"D- E -;,
~.i-~8.::.Q
~t-~ ._~-=
-_ - g ::I c:
g,a~_o-:;:,
~.:!:-: :~ :
g:-.!i~="fi
-=~::~':~~
~!ci.22:=
:i.ecd:ci.:;c:i.
o "0
:.. ~ ~ ~
6 6 Q Q
S 'a
So ,?i'
.1: ~
"'-5
c .
.~ g
.';:: ::>
s .
::;; '3
'"
.g ;:
. 0
.~ ~
~ i::J
'" u
. -5
Q ~
u ~
oS 9
..... -8
o 0
'" S
'0 "'0 ~
:a ~ ~
~ c Q,
~..~ i'
~ ~ .a
11 -5 [
5 n .,g
= E .;
.!2 C a
~ -E 0
~ s '"
'€i So is
,l! e Iii
.... Q, '"
.
'"
'"
6
~
u
"
e
s
.[
.0
iii
.8
'~
.
'"
::;;
o
~
'0
00 c
'" 0
6 8
.. ~
u
5 ::3
S u
g :;
9 Iii
~ g,
c .2
8,0
. c
e Jl
s 'a
~ ?;>
e i::J
~ ~
s: ~
.0
'"
~
6
vi
~
o
..
c
u
S
S
o
u
S
~
c
8,
.
e
s
.l!
e
~
~
u
'"
'"
6
'" u -
~ ~ :S[ ~
3: 0 ._
" -
~ 'C Q" ~
[E~ ,;~
ell e is: ";I
:s ,.g 0 a
.s';~'>
'" -5 1!
11 6 '0 ....
.; ;s c ~
co5.g'~
u t fr oS
u .
~ ~ ~ :s
'" - u
~ ~ ;s
v c -5
-g ~ !
~ s: u
9 .E
... ~ ~
~ 'e' 9
e Q, 'll
~ 11 u
3 c ~
0: ,~ ~
..0 .g 5
is e .8
c .s ~
= .., ..c
u M g
!ii
...
'"
'"
6
-5
'~
'll
fi ti
~ ::a
.!:l .%
~ '0
!l .~
U 0
J]
"; ~
o U
.~ S
'" Si,
a ';;J
~ ]
t) .;;:;
E S
. U
/1i7 ~?~
..
...
...
i
.,
...
..,
..;
.,
...
...
"
...
,
...
,\
...
.,
...
...
...
...
.,
...
,
.;~
--
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
.:
,
"
~
'-,I
.
I
I
c
~
,"
, ~
.
,',
" .
I
f .
~ .
'.:2 ..
I
j, ~
"
,
"
"
, .
.
:s! E
.
"
.
.
~
~
I
"
I
d
"
3
"
~
...,
."
I
,
~
2
I
;; II c 5 u " ~ ;;
~ c ~ .a u
~ ."
u I ~ Q, ~ e
'S: 'C ~ 9 :sl ~
e 9 .c ~ u
.8 '6 u " .. '" u
-5 u u
S -" .~ -5 9
9 ~ .. '" <; -5 -5 u
c ~ '::> ~ c ,; [
~ -" 'g \j .Jl u "0 ~ .~
'" > '<3
~ c ;, 0 'Q, u ~ ~
u '" g ~ ~ ~-5
-5 ~ ~ ~ ~
c " <; " .. ~ 9 9
~ .. ~ u
8- ~ "
~ ~ g ~ ~ '" .l!
.~ E ~ c ~ .~ "0 .~
oS 's. ~ ~ ;; 0 e
u " '" e S ~
'5 ';j -5 9 u u ~
~ ~ -" ~
u E '<3 -5 u
:E .5 ~ ~ ~ ;;;
u -"
. ~ ~ '0 :s u .>! ~
a .. ~ :E ~ d
'" c '" :; u
Oil ~ ~ i 'S: .9
S - iii .g ]
-" [ :;
'" .~ .5 ] j
~ <; ~ -" c ~ a
c " ~ c
5 u Q u .= 'C ."
~ '5 ~ 9 a ~
~ u I ~ .,.;
:; '" 0 c
.5 '" '" ,s E e '6 :'.
~ '" ~ " "0 u " ~
'" c ..
.. .~ e c ~ c '"
a E ~ - ~ -" c e ,s ." ..
u ~ .~ c c
." u ~ '" " c " !
!l, e ~ < u -"
." -" .;; e a = -" 'll g,
'6 ~ ~ c ~ . e
e :s .~ c .~
0 .8 u u
9 < " '0 a e e 0 u
.. '0 e >
'0 5 ." -! :; .8
.l! '" u '" 'e ~
u .. '8- '" '" ~
e ~ ~ .. :; ;; " ~ '"
M e ~ -5 .. ~ 0 ~
,s " c e .j;' Q
s:, u ~ ] 'a
u ~ .~ u
;;; ii: .. "0 . U ..
= ~ ...
'" - -
'" '" '"
'" '"
"
If
..
-;
.
-.
~i
..
g";
....,
0-
.0
-.
-'"
o.
..
-.
...,
-.
G.
.
&"
.0
::
..-
i;
..
:;;
~
"0
..
.
..
-
:;;
o
S
-
"
.
-
.
!
.
.
.
.
>
~
<
.
.
-
..
~
;;
..
.
A
..
"
!
.~
..
"'..,
--
OA
--
....
.-
..-
.-
A
G.
~-s
:i-:
is
A_
o.
.s--5
...
..-
-5
u_
~
_0
:u.
0-
:.=-
A-
<"
=
'"
'"
a,_,l:':O;lCg
.:....c:=....!_
&:aE~a.::~
;;~Sl.:-;.;i
..'a_U... c
(J:;-t~3
Aii..c~o=:.
..s-.....
Sa ..-a..oc....
~'t i.;ii..... ~
2:!II~o.c~
-:-c......~:!~'Q
.. :0.__>-
= u:: ~::::".::}:g
..;-g--:=:a
~O. .... 0."
v..ct:-o_ .
.- .!!:Jooo..!!.._
~.J...-::'U::-.
:.:~:;~~;
:':"'::e~1
o~-.u_.
;~2t~:;~
!,,:!~o"~~
- .- -
.'Q-.... u u.w.
..::8.....c'U>u
"'0 ....lIII-....;:I
r t.:~:; =--:~
~Q.o':~e-'a:i
;:';-a:~;;:
~;:o:::e;:;;
.-o"i'):"&:_
c..a-~~:;...j
i::~=i:;.-
.... -,;
:::t:.I_::ile
=:;g~:'i .:.:
<1ig..:.iiJ-
....o..u _
cq!.:t Q.-!~;~
'~~;:::-"'''o:
l=i.:~:..
lil'a~~-:.::~:
.:';;~':':~: iJ.
...
-
'9
o
.
-
"t
"
0.....
-...
~.:;
=.-:
=3~
ilc;
-:it-
;~:
."'-
~...
~.:-:
_0_
:..!!'5
g:i~
. -
~ -f(
"0_
"0 eN
:di.:
0--
0_
~8;
=.!::!~
- ~
0", .
-ii:i-
;.!di
.-" 0
a-
~... ..
-uo
""~..::
:; J:~..
a-_c
..:.:~
C "_0
:c::o..=
u-_.
uC:;Q.~
EuECll
v e- c
"c_ 0.-
-Q-.
_0_.
_:to.
oG'c_
.A:."
.0- ..
i~i~
_'a_a
-..-
-.0:0.,
"....a
_.e.
.
!<
=~
&:-
a..
0_
u~
t:.2
~-
..
...'"
~..
u=l
:i:>
( ~~
~ GO
\ - .
i' ~~
:ou
, ..-
, &:0
,J .:;:2~
-0-- ~i: f
1,\ C .oC"
~'au::
~;.~' :h~
_A_
6 ..
V _c_
~ o~c::!.
;cl fl - 77
...
'"
'"
~
,.:
~
.
=
=
...,
=
.
...
"
...
..
=
."
~
:=
=
.
'a
'il
e
.
u
..
=
'e
=
..
0:
.
:5
:I
~ III
i no
d !3tJ~
~ i!i
o ~ai
!iU
e
.
.::
.
.
;;
=
~
"!lU ii
J~t~
f ii~~f
r; i tit H
.h ! il1t
.~.=:: il 3gll~_
8~ ~ 9~ltlj
!1. :1 !3Jlr
d ~ Hds
i
I
:f II /</k7'6'
If
JI
u
'"
;l!
~
!::'
i
tJ
ffi
'"
~
~ ~
!jj m
~ "'
o ~
tJ t;
1:l
~
~
..
A'
"ll
g
~
;
...
~
Jl
Ii:
~
J;
11
;
~
.
oS
S
8
~
i
-,;
-
~ li
i'i
"a._
~~
.
~
.Ii
.g
f
i.
li
sa
Us
oS1ij
H
118
ir
'6~
~~
"')
~..
""
"'"
.
"'"
"'!
""t
""
,
j
""
...
""
.,
"'"
I
f
I
~
I
'a :i n
11 '" "Ii
g 2 j
's 'a t'"
~ ~ t .1
., ~ . 'i!
~ ~ oS !l
~ s ~ ~-
~ i !J: 1-
~ -i II .n
... Ii!
wi" ~ ;I fa
I ~ I ~~
1:l J ! t~
i t t ~] j
~ 8. e 8'll-
-:~ ~ :=11
~~ Q H
_::;II..c VIIS
.!l ~ ~ :--~
~~ Jill
!~ ~~ ~~
~~ ~l>! ~!i
;:;:.. ;:;:~ ;:;:;1
;~
..,
""l
1
,
,
.
J
...
..,
""
,
.
j
""l
1
,
"
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ... ~~ l~~!i -!lii;]s 11 1''''' IHH
,., ~ .x"',ll.x
0 ;il~
" 5 _ '" 't:J 1 >."0
, !i e B 0........: Hps~ .x~ l! .~ "3 ,,-
In ~5: ~ "'II ~
1'1 IHII: - q J~.!
I " ! 8''' g~8=o
<C~ J~.:I'I~'a a C ~. lO.:'.....:a ~ ~.I.8
Ill; .~ '.. 'll_ .d 1 112 t.:l'ilf~ ,ll ~
i~ ,ll~lii i~ "is - ~
.;I~~U .l!.~ :1 ~!~,llfi h.xj
'" h 1:s ..- ..
I ". PU~s "iSj5 l~,llr~ ~Ii~
." :X-lilli-en U ~ ... -
]1"'''' l .. " L!lll
'!: 5'ii.~ , "
." u~ liStf,) e- -1 -li~~..8 e... j ~
~sUH A o-s'll! - .a'a~ :. ~ll -
., n 'l.il~U! ..1'a"-~ .x~ il=s~ l~.~H 'llui
" iHt-!J-, ..ll
I ~1 ... .!!. 11
j~ t ~1~" .a~ -'l
lH!h f--:,ll~! . f:il~
., ~':;~~I'iil :t;'Eli!1 ~1 ,ll ~..!~ 1~ i HI
~I ~ h g,!i "'-; 'll5 5;jl:
I 18 :ij ~If:.~ : ,ll j:1i i ~i'P . "I;a--i 'll ~ ::>
,llUS8" It g ..5 ..] !:l illl
, ] E 5 ~ ..] 'i ll'll ~ ~
~ ]:'S]8~ ~"'{l ~i"J>. --0-
,-l, ~81~i~t 'II~1 11 !UHi i~U~~
~::; i '", pi 1jii '1:';;1 g
" :i oog,,,
I ~h ~oh~ 3t :I Q 9 iJ 0 'llil .. .:s! 8 J! .. -ll .;~:!! sUiS.b
r "~5'g.s.o HI i. s'" - .s 'asa 00 ;3
., ifi..o,ll ll,- a s ].:1ri '" "2! ~ ifd~
e 5 <l 00 e a.i~'a v1 0 ooJl"'~ Hii_id
p~.s1-~ -a "35 5 = ",
, ...- s:il ~ B 1 f~ f~ ~ti"E f&o1jJ
, ,.]" '"
I ~h lh.Hl n~f~.lll Hi 0 . .!f. ~:.
ll'll,ll B "'..... .;.; b-ll
!io'a~~i.. .. . 5 i .....oulii
Jj ~ - ~ ~Il 0 ll:q - tI ~o ~-: ~ '0 ;>.,"S ~
Jl "1~Ui ..5 I I -5 ~~.s~ b:3..o ;::I";i
;d ~il' 00 :~ i IH 1 lUll
I " ~ ~ - ]
~ ~~ l!
~ .1 ",~u.!l ;ill ~]~-lll r~ esiR: ~ ~"'Qo
Ira '" 500 -
~ ,,5 .; a"'.8 6 <6~ i"! 8,ll-llri~ 8.Jl.8~8
"" 0 0 :S'i :::tlc::~g au 8,g 118
< c:: if; c Po
I ;c.;ft ~7?
-
't
...
. g -s ...
,Q .~ ,Q
'"
.~ .~ < .
>
" ~ '5 e ...
. '" is:
.~ . .
.
.9 . E .8
:s -s 9 ';i
. 9 0; "'
-s .s "' . ...
'" . -s
>. il . -s .
. " 9 c.
. [ . '"
-s . ~ .
. .~ ~
c. ] '" . 0
.
'" ;; -s i ...
. ~ -s ~ " i
~ <9 ,
. c. .. S .. C:l
-s .!j 'C ,Q
II " 'C
" . . II .
. " E "' . .
<9 '" :'52:
~ c E "'!
.. :. ~ ~ '=
" ~ ;; . 0 ::0
e . ,2 h i
E c. ~ E u :;
. <9 ~
. ~ . .
u . ~ 0; Ii g,
. ...
0 . 0 .ll
u 0 1l .
. ." ';i '" F' Cl
-s '6 "' . c
S . ~ .
'"
9 u ~ .~ '0
~ . ~
= 0 . ~ <> ...
8- . .;; (J ,
ii ~ F E . . J
0 e -s -s
u
oS .5
...
~ f
.; .~
.,
.,
... !~ -S~!lllij ';.8'; }..g" "l~Hi 1li~i~ " " il. 1
., !!i .ll.li.ll .5~
'":J H~J!~ ~:g s ~ ""1 ""Q
" 1~ ells. o::J ""j "'- ~
, !i .!l] 0 ~ils i 0 e= .Jlli"'p U.Jl l?8.a .s8.
In ~ -'l?
,., ~e~~'i . 1118'3 sf 'f' ll~il1 f e~ " "'!
" l! hlS "
,;: Jl~ !.l!'!1 n. il j.. Jl
~=" ~HH ! Ii.. :: ~g ~
.!l n.~.' 0
'll.8 i~i ! l~!d B ~l ~
~ it ,h.t"il ,~ edJ
,n "'ll'li "'-1 ';~IJ ' ....8-S~
'" f :i_II Iii!! 1i'~ ~a 8':i jill. U '~ ,
." a oO'! I
~ .'" ' fiHi li.'" ~..' SOj t' si= j
'" :'1 i-U l~j;iji '16ll.1 ~u"'.. il RtiiI d s-
A 1"'0
" I'll l!.;ooO . 'i 8..88 J ui >....< ~~i !S~ iq :z:
c .,
2 8. ';S.Jjl Ul lilH IS" .g,s {h a
0'" ~'~P:g' ~
~ H ihi~ -:ll"~lii ." ,
'" h~ f~. llii.Jli~ '8 <
~ H- o oO'; e'8 <>
" . ~lhil j ]if .8"~1.5 89] ~~i
~ s'~~ ~j .., f s'
'0 ~ ei'; !i-g ,g~ll ~l i 1Iil. ...
~i tD~~'a ~ -d'"O~a~ y N it:i .- 11_
-31 '5 is;.!lhll Hi ';il.~~1l li~ ~~.8t i~gH~ :[ "0
~i:I II!; ~illi = 'lle. S.!!'; ,S,g
;!J il~~-P H ?;lij sUI-'S h
aj .;' .:!'~ s.8 .!j~e 's.Jlll~e s~ " .,
11- e'''lij j~::s~ "." 1.8 "'1 Olfs
= . 'l~ ~ f ~ _~o ,g,s .8:i",,g,,, ~=.f 1t ~
's. - .- - he ~ -
" .. ':I it: ~.; It l!'~ . 'Iii.
sij l~g 15 l:2i ! iiq; ! ijlllllS! ~ >...:! s u 1!=
".' 8_8: ~ . . ~ s -il 2 A .a I,) oS nI
a::::a S j 8..5 P Jl _0
., -"," pllil~ .lie
," ~~.M ~.~ "-:.::.i !ji ~Us h I~I rJ II ' .,
i~9 16j~,~g ~] ~lU liS. o'~
c"., 13i . i ! Og ,;
: .. ~ iI dl ~,~}~~ hi ," 'il ~.tj~j95 ] Is
P ,,- ,,,'6 i c I '~Jl i':I-~ '1lJ! i 11. J 'li .
" ,- IS_a l=f ....
~ i,ll.; Ji~ H-I' hi1~ s:g'; ~ ~ '~:g'9'il= 'sll ,
In eS ,
u .3!! ~~ u.ll ~ E::J_ij e ;:s ::l e e ..[5 d
.. ,8 ~.fle.!j.ll " 8 h8,goO
)11-150 ~ ,
,.;
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~I
:"[
'-.
;.::;'
e
f i
I i
. i
f ~
~ f
.1 ,ll
's t
II Ei 0
~ B ,s
t i I
~ j 1 ~
i ~ '~1i j
..: ~ .li Oil g
~ . i i 1; ~
U:i 11 9~
'"".il "5 "il.
U ~ ~ ~'I.
IIi ~ ~ E ~
il .gi 'i~ :h ~~
~ illl 11.il 'g-ll ait
~ h ~t ~.!! H
'" uP!
,.
in
.ll
~
~
i
o ./l
~ e
; J!
I j
I
9
;-
".
Q
"
,
In
,.,
"
... ..
~ :ll
~ g
...
~ J
"'
'D
.~
'D
,
.r
"
o
z
,
w
~
"
~
~
,"
.,
':-:
~-=l
,.,
".
I ~,
,.,
,
E
...
8
'"'
..
...
~
;i
~
~
'0
f
:ll
li
.!j
~
..
~
E
u
,s
9
e
..
lil..
'"'.l!
"j
Ii
00
~,s
/111 /2/ I
1
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SECTION 3
DRAFT SUPPLEMENTAL EIR 90-12
Jl! /J -' g' J-,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Draft Supplemental Environmental
Impact Report (EIR 90- 12) for the
Olympic Training Center Boathouse
SCH #9001070
Prepared for:
The City of Chula Vista
April 1992
)tf/f~~}
I
I TABLE OF CONTENTS
I SECTION TIT. ,Ii: PAGE
1 IN1RODUCTIONANDSUMMARY 1-1
I 1.1 Pwpose/History/Procedures 1-1
1.2 Scope of the SEIR and Impacts Found Not to be Significant 1-9
I 1.3 Summary of Impacts 1-16
1.4 Summary Comparison of Alternatives 1-16
I 2 PROJECT DESCR1PTION 2-1
I 2.1 Site Location 2-1
2.2 Background: Olympic Training Center and Boathouse 2-1
2.3 Project Objectives 2-2
I 2.4 Project Components and Characteristics 2-3
2.5 Discretionary Actions Required 2-20
I 2.6 Project Schedule 2-22
I 3 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS 3-1
3.1 Recreational Use Compatibility 3-1
3.2 AestheticsNisuaI Resources 3-21
I 3.3 Geology and Soils 3-30
3.4 Hydrology and Water Quality 3-38
I 3.5 Cultural Resources 3-44
3.6 Biological Resources 3-46
I 3.7 Traffic and Circulation 3-55
I 4 ALTERNATIVES 4-1
4.1 Introduction 4-1
4.2 No ProjectINo Development 4-7
I 4.3 Alternative Location 1: OTC Boathouse at City of San Diego
Boat Launch Site; City Facilities at North Point 4-8
I 4.4 Alternative Location 2: City of San Diego Boat Launch
(Shared Site) 4-23
4.5 Originally Proposed Project Site 4-27
I
I i JV/l/~i
010571000
I
....
-
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
-
SECTION TITI,R PAGE
5 REFERENCES 5-1 -
6 INDIVIDUALS AND AGENCIES CONSULTED 6-1
-
7 LIST OF PREPARERS AND CERTIFICATION OF ACCURACY 7-1
-
LIST OF FIGURES -
SECTION TITLE PAGE
-
1-1 Regional Location of Project Site 1-3
1-2 Vicinity Map and Site Topography 1-4
1-3 Jurisdictional and Ownership Boundaries 1-5 -
1-4 EastLake Planned Community Project Components 1-7
2-1 Site Plan 2-4 -
2-2 Dock Facilities 2-5
2-3 Grading and Utilities Plan 2-6 -
2-4 Landscape Concept Plan 2-7
2-5 Floor and Roof Plan 2-8
-
2-6 Building Elevations 2-9
2-7 Training Course 2-10
2-8 Time Trials Course 2-11 -
2-9 Course Sections 2-12
2-10 Leased Area 2-20 -
3-1 Lower Otay Maximum and Minimum Gauges 3-7
3-2 Potential Use Conflicts 3-10
-
3-3 Prohibited Use Area During Hunting Season 3-12
3-4 Rowing/Paddling Area Unaffected by 150-foot Constraint 3-16
3-4(a) Site Photos 3-23 -
3-4(b ) Site Photos 3-25
3-5 Photo Key Map 3-27 -
3-6 Soil Types of Project Area 3-36
3-7 Vegetation Communities and Sensitive Plant Species Location 3-47
...
,
ii Ji-!I1- K~ 010571000
-
I
I TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
I LIST OF FIGURES
I SECTION TITI,R PAGE
3-8 California Gnatcatcher Territories at Lower Otay Reservoir 3-49
I 3-9 Existing Area Circulation Network 3-56
4-1 Applicant's Site and Design Alternatives 4-5
4-2 Alternative Site Location Photos 4-11
I 4-3 Alternative Site Location Photo Key Map 4-13
4-4 Vegetation Communities in the Immediate Vicinity of the
I Existing City of San Diego Boat Launch Site 4-19
4-5 Vegetation Communities and Sensitive Plant Species Locations
at the North Point Site 4-20
I 4-6 Vegetation Communities and Sensitive Plant Species Location
at the Originally Proposed Site 4-30
I
LIST OF TABLES
I SECTION TITLE PAGE
I I-I Summary of Impacts 1-11
1-2 Comparison of Alternatives 1-17
I 3-1 Lower Otay Reservoir Boating Tickets 3-4
3-2 Lower Otay Reservoir Annual Fishing/Duck Hunting Tickets
1988-1991 3-5
I 3-3 Estimated Daily Rowing/Paddling Schedule 3-8
3-4 Seismicity for Major Faults Within One Hundred Kilometers
I of the Project Site 3-33
3-5 Modified Mercalli Scale, 1956 Version 3-34
I LIST OF APPENDICES
I LETTER TITI.R
A NOP/Distribution ListlResponses
I B Draft Mitigation Monitoring Program in Accordance with AB3180
C Facilities Management Plan
I /cj Ij /~ ~
010571000 iii
I
...
-
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
...
LIST OF APPENDICES (Continued)
LF.TTF.R
TIT' .R
-
D
E
F
G
H
I
Monthly Breakdown of Boating Tickets on Otay Reservoir
Chronology of Citizen Meetings
Geotechnical Analysis
Soakaway Basin Conceptual Design Report
Biological Resources Data
Revegetation/Mitigation Plan for Olympic Training Center
Boathouse, Lower Otay Lake
...
...
...
...
....
-
-
...
...
...
...
-
...
-
iv
)l111-~7
010571000
....
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SECTION 1
INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY
1.1 PURPOSE/HISTORy/PROCEDURES
Purpose of the Supplemental EIR
This Recirculated Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) for the Olympic
Training Center (OTC) Boathouse Facility Conditional Use Permit (CUP) has been
prepared for the City of Chula Vista, in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA). This document is supplemental to the Olympic Training Center
Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan SEIR (City of Chula Vista EIR 89-11, certified in
April 1990) which addressed the environmental consequences of the overall OTC project,
and supplemental to the EastLake III General Development Plan EIR (certified in
November 1989).
CEQA of 1970 requires the preparation of an EIR or other CEQA environmental documents
for any discretionary action under consideration by a public agency. The purpose of an
EIR is to inform the public and decision makers about the nature of a project under
consideration, potential impacts which could result from the project's implementation, and
mechanisms which could reduce, avoid or mitigate the potential impacts.
A SEIR is required under CEQA (Section 21166) when one or more of the following
events occurs:
a) Substantial changes are proposed on the project which will require
major revisions to the EIR;
b) Substantial changes occur with respect to circumstances under which the
project is being undertaken, which will require major revisions in the
EIR;
c) New information becomes available which was not known at the time of
the previous EIR certification.
The project, subject to the above criteria, is defined as a SEIR, due to changes in
circumstance and project characteristics, as described in the following paragraphs.
010571000
1-1
It.) f) -~i
...
...
Background Information/Project History
....
The subject site is located in the eastern territories area of Chula Vista, immediately west of
Lower Otay Reservoir (Figure 1-1). Figure 1-2 provides a vicinity map of the site and its
boundaries. Figure 1-3 illustrates the site and its relationship to the Otay Reservoir,
jurisdictional boundaries and the City of San Diego boat launching facility.
...
-
When the OTC project was under consideration by the City of Chula Vista in 1989/1990,
the intent was to annex to the City of Chula Vista the OTC project site west of Wueste Road
ouly, and to leave the proposed boathouse area (east of Wueste Road) under County
jurisdiction (Figure 1-3 illustrates jurisdictional boundaries). Under such a scenario the
City of Chula Vista could not take action on the area east of Wueste Road because that area
would be under County jurisdiction; therefore the boathouse portion of the OTC project
was intended to be processed through the County's development and environmental review
system. This process was to have occurred after the City of Chula Vista approved the OTC
SPA Plan and the Local Agency Formation Commission approved the annexation. Also,
the precise boathouse location had not been chosen at that time and the facility had not been
designed.
...
"""'"
...
...
...
When the OTC project's annexation was under consideration by LAFCO, the annexation
boundary was refined by LAFCO staff to incorporate additional acreage east of Wueste
Road. The additional area, which includes the boathouse site, effectively extended the
Chula Vista city jurisdiction to the lake's shoreline area. The project's annexation approval
by LAFCO on March 6, 1990 resulted in the entire OTC area's inclusion within the City of
Chula Vista (refer to LAFCO environmental documentation for annexation). These
circumstances and Boathouse project characteristics led to the need for a Supplemental ElR
exclusively on the Boathouse project, which is now under the jurisdiction of the City of
Chula Vista and under consideration by the Cities of Chula Vista and San Diego (property
owner).
...
-
...
..
...
Previous Environmental DocumentationlIncorporation By Reference
...
The project site is situated on the eastern edge of the EastLake Planned Community area of
the City of Chula Vista, at the western edge of the Lower Otay ReservoirlLake. Although
not within the boundaries of the EastLake Planned Community, the site is now tied from a
policy and land planning standpoint to the EastLake community and the City of Chula
...
...
1-2
JL/.Ij-'~I
010571000
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'----.-.---.-7
i ~.,.
~ '.'-
,. .........
~._. .~
! ~._.._._..-
!
---.-.-.-.-.---.-.-..-..-..
FALLBROOK
...
..,
C'>
....
~
...
C'>
LEUCADI~
o
C'>
,.,
'>
Eleo,,,."1
~
'Z
ALPINE
~lH!lg"d
R'",uoi,
:tt~""
~f
Q
o
.
MILES
---
USAeQflDER~----
__-----m:Xico
OGDEN
.....
FIGURE
B
Regional Location of Project Site
/~IJ ~/O
1-3
. -.
i . - . . Quadrangles
\ . OIay Mounlaln 7.5
. Mesa and
~, "'" To ..~..y q
Vicinity Map and Site p ) tI/l / ( I
OGDEN
.....
1-2
1-4
...
...
...
....
-
...
-
...
-
...
...
...
-
....
...
....,
...
..
...
I
-,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I OGDEN
.....
I
()
~ -
"'/
LEGEND
~ COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO JURISDICTION
. ~:~::~~E:T:~~:::;ION
1200
,
Jurisdictional and Ownership Boundaries
JL!1i -/~
FEET
FIGURE
~
1-5
-
...
Vista. The OTC project's first conceptual approval was included in the EastLake III
General Development Plan and annexation of the OTC and boathouse site area into Chula
Vista; the second level approval was the OTC SPA Plan (see Figure 1-4).
-
The following previous City of Chula Vista environmental documents are utilized in this
SEIR and are incorporated herein by reference. These documents can be obtained at the
City of Chula Vista Planning Department:
...
...
Final EIR 89-11: Olympic Training Center SPA Plan (4190)
Final EIR 89-9: EastLake III GDP/Pre-wne/Annexation (9/89)
Final EIR 88-2: City of Chula Vista General Plan Update (1989)
....
...
In addition to Chula Vista documents, the following City of San Diego, County of
San Diego and LAFCO documents are referenced and incorporated by reference herein.
These documents can be obtained at the Departments of Planning/Land Use at the
respective agencies noted below:
...
...
City of San Diego: CEQA documentation for City of San Diego Water Utilities
Department Boat Launch Facility Expansion (July, 1990)
-
San Diego County LAFCO: CEQA documentation for the OTC area annexation
(March 6,1990)
...
...
Environmental Procedures/Responsibilities of Governmental Agencies
...
City of Chula Vista
...
The project site is within the incorporated boundaries of the City of Chula Vista. CEQA
requires the preparation of an environmental document for any discretionary action under
consideration by the City of Chula Vista. The City of Chula Vista is the Lead Agency for
the proposed Conditional Use Permit (CUP) project and has determined that a SEIR is
warranted. The City is responsible for action on the project. Responsible Agencies are
listed below, along with each agency's involvement in the Boathouse project.
-
...
...
1-6
;1-/ If -1:3
...
010571000
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
. "
..
LEGEND
I~ ~ ~ ~ :1 EASTLAKE I
~ EASTLAKE'
I ::: : I EASTLAKE r;
......
.....
.....
. . . .. EASTLAKE III
.....
.....
II PROJECT SITE
o
,
Q
3000
,
FEET
SOURCE: Cinti & Associates 1989
OGDEN
.....
FIGURE
J1G
East Lake Planned COmmunity Project COmponents
/f 1/ -
1.7
-
-
Citv of San Diel!o
...,
The City of San Diego Water Utilities Department (WUD) owns the Lower Otay Reservoir
and surrounding lakefront areas which include the proposed boathouse site. The City of
San Diego WUD also currently owns and operates the nearby boat launching facility. The
City of San Diego WUD and San Diego National Sports Training Foundation (Foundation)
would enter into a lease agreement (for the location of the boathouse on WUD property), in
conjunction with the CUP approval by Chula Vista. The WUD is involved in review of
this Draft EIR.
-
-
-
County of San Die~o
-
The County has jurisdiction over North Point, the lake and lands to the east, as illustrated
in Figure 1-3. The County is also involved in review of the Draft EIR.
-
California DeDartment ofFish and Game
-
The California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG) will review the Draft SEIR and
provide input in regard to wetlands protection (California Fish and Game Code
Section 1603) and consideration of sensitive species.
-
-
Federal Al!encies
...
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Corps), in consultation with the U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS), will review the Draft EIR and provide input in regard to the
Waters of the U.S. and wetlands issues and impacts (Section 404). The USFWS will also
review the project and EIR with consideration of the Federal Endangered Species Act
(Section lOA).
...
-
Public Review Procedures
-
A Notice of Preparation (NOP) was distributed by the City of Chula Vista to solicit input
from agencies regarding the scope and content of the SEIR. The NOP review period ended
on August 10, 1990. The NOP, distribution list and comments received on the NOP are
included in Appendix A of this SEIR. Responses to comments received during the NOP
period are incorporated in the text of the SEIR at the appropriate locations.
...
-
...
1-8
)~
1) 1-.. 010571000
plr;- -95
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
This Recirculated Draft SEIR responds to various concerns raised by commentators on the
prior draft SEIR (dated January 1992). Readers are advised that if they feel that any points
raised in their earlier comments on the prior draft are not adequately addressed in this
Recirculated Draft SEIR, they must submit these points in a new comment letter before the
end of the public comment period. This Recirculated Draft SEIR supersedes all previous
drafts. All of the comments received on the January 1992 Draft SEIR in addition to
comments received on this recirculated Draft SEIR will be included in the response to
comments section of the Final SEIR.
This Recirculated Draft SEIR is available for review by the public and public agencies for a
period of 45 days. Comments on the SEIR are invited and may be submitted to the City of
Chula Vista Planning Department, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 92010. The
Recirculated Draft SEIR is available at the Planning Department and the Chula Vista City
Library. The Planning Department will consider all written comments on the Draft SEIR
before making recommendations to the Planning Commission and City Council, regarding
the extent and nature of the environmental impacts of the proposed project
The City of Chula Vista Planning Commission will hear further public input and will
consider the Final SEIR when making recommendations to the City Council. The Council
must certify the Final SEIR as complete and in compliance with CEQA before approving or
disapproving the project CUP. Public input is encouraged at all hearings.
The Final SEIR would also be used by the City of San Diego City Council, as the CEQA
documentation for the project's lease agreement between the City of San Diego WUD and
Foundation.
Mitigation Monitoring Program (AB3180)
A draft mitigation monitoring program (MMP) has been prepared for the City of Chula
Vista for the proposed project to comply with AB3180. The draft MMP is contained in
Appendix B. AB3180 requires monitoring of only those impacts identified as significant
or potentially significant. The monitoring program for the OTC Boathouse therefore,
addresses the impacts associated with the following issue areas: recreational land use
compatibility/operations, aesthetic/visual resources, geology and soils; hydrology/water
010571000
1-9
/v/! -9~
-
...
quality, biological resources, and traffic/circulation. No significant adverse cultural
resources impacts were identified.
...
1.2 SCOPE OF THE SEIR AND IMPACTS FOUND NOT TO BE SIGNIFICANT
...
Environmental Issues of the Proposed Project
-
This Supplemental EIR addresses potential environmental impacts of the OTC Boathouse,
currently under consideration by the Cities of Chula Vista and San Diego. The proposed
project is described in detail in Section 2, Project Description. The SElR contains the full
range of sections required under CEQA for a Supplemental EIR: Introduction, Project
Description, Impact Analysis, Alternatives Analysis, Summary of Unavoidable Significant
Environmental Impacts, References and Consultant Identification.
...
-
...
Each of the issue areas/sections listed below were identified by the City of Chula Vista
(with public input) as potentially significant environmental impacts. The SEIR reviews in
sufficient detail these potential impacts associated with implementation of the project,
constituting the scope of this SEIR:
...
,-
. Recreational Use Compatibility/Operations
. Landform Alteration/Visual Quality
. Geology/Soils
. Drainage!Hydrology!Water Quality
. Biological Resources
. Cultural Resources
. Traffic/Circulation
. Alternatives
-
...
...
-
Alternatives to the Proposed Project
-
A major component of the Draft SEIR process is the Alternatives Section. Due to potential
biological impacts, visual impacts and recreational use conflicts between the OTC
Boathouse and nearby fishing and hunting recreational uses (operated from the adjacent
City of San Diego boat launching facility), alternatives were identified. The proposed
project's location and design is the result of review of a number of alternatives. The
proposed site was found to result in less significant impacts than the alternatives assessed.
...
....
...
1-10
F(f1/17
010571000
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The alternatives reviewed during the Draft SEIR process are described and analyzed in
detail in Section 4 (Alternatives). The importance of the proposed site and the alternatives
in reducing potential impacts is considered a major factor in this project's CEQA process.
Issues Found Not to be Significant
Other issue areas considered not to be significant by the City of Chula Vista are listed
below. Note that the conclusion of insignificance is based in part upon the previous
environmental documentation listed on the preceding pages. In concept the Boathouse was
considered in the OTC SPA Plan analyses contained in EIR 89-11. Those analyses are
incorporated by reference herein.
. Land Use Consistency (General Plan and Zoning were addressed in EIR
89-11 for the OTC);
. Noise (insignificant; OTC impacts were addressed in EIR 89-11);
. Air Quality (insignificant; OTC impacts were addressed in EIR 89-11);
. Public Services and Utilities (insignificant; OTC impacts were addressed
in EIR 89-11);
. Socioeconomic and Fiscal Factors (insignificant; OTC impacts were
addressed in EIR 89-11);
. Mineral Resources (insignificant impact);
. Growth Inducing Impacts (insignificant; OTC impacts were addressed
in EIR 89-11);
,
. The Relationship Between Local Short-Term Use of the Environment
and the Maintenance and Enhancement of Long-Term Productivity
(addressed in EIR 89-11);
. Cumulative Impacts Summary (addressed in EIR 89-11);
. Significant Irreversible Environmental Changes (addressed in EIR
89-11).
1.3 SUMMARY OF IMPACTS
The Summary of Impacts (Table 1-1) on the following pages provides an overview of
impacts under each environmental topic, measures or actions to mitigate or reduce the
impacts, and whether the impact can be mitigated to below a level of significance. It is
010571000
1-11
/L/1~/Y
...
-
-
-
-
-
1-12
/cjf! ~q/
010571000
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table 1-1 (Continued)
SUMMARY OF IMPACTS
Issue/Impact
Mitigation .
Level of Significance
. Mter Mitigation
Geolol!V and Soils:
Potential geologic impacts
pertain to certain problematic
lithologies and the seismicity
in the project area. A possi-
ble adverse. lithologic impact
may result from the occa-
sional well-cemented, dense
units of the Sweetwater For-
mation, causing difficulty in
mechanical ripping during
construction. The clayey
portions of the Sweetwater
Formation, which are expan-
si ve, could cause a shrink-
swell effect that could dam-
age foundations.
Possible adverse, significant
seismic impacts are related to
ground-shaking caused by
rupture on distant regional
faults. The potential for
inundation by seiche on the
Lower Otay Reservoir exists.
Possible adverse, significant
soil impacts include shrink-
swell or expansive nature of
soils and the erosional nature
of particular soils. Soil types
found within the site are
moderately expansive and
could cause damage to poor-
ly constructed foundations.
Project development could
result in an increased sedi-
mentload in runoff water
which is likely to drain into
Lower Otay Reservoir.
010571000
The project design will ex-
clude the clayey expansive
portions of the Sweetwater
Formation from the upper
three feet of subgrade to
reduce the potential for
damaged foundations. The
proposed project design shall
adhere to standards specified
by the Uniform Building
Code (UBC) to minimize
damage associated with
possible earthquake intensi-
ties.
Problems due to expansive
soils will be compensated by
selective grading and spe-
cially designed foundations
as set forth in the Uniform
Building Code. Erosional
rates will be minimized
through erosional control
measures such as maintain-
ing vegetative cover and
revegetated buffer zones.
1-13
Geologic and soil impacts
will be reduced to below
levels of significance with
implementation of the
prescribed measures.
Jiff/~tJ
...
-
Table 1-1 (Continued)
SUMMARY OF IMPACTS
...
Level of Significance
Issue/Impact Mitigation Mter Mitigation
...
HvdrologylWater Ouality:
Potential impacts to the Measures prescribed for the Surface drainage and water -
potable water supply of the drainage system in the quality impacts will be
Otay Reservoir would occur Soakaway Basin Conceptual reduced to levels below
due to increased runoff and Design Report will reduce significance with imple- -
sediment loads created by the impacts associated with mentation of mitigation
project's impervious areas increased runoff. The measures.
and during the initial project will incorporate -
construction period. appropriate erosion control
measures including slope
Of primary concern is the im- revegetation, maintenance
pact to water quality from the of drainage devices, and ...
potential discharge of urban vegetative buffers, as well
runoff contaminants from as timely planning of
parking lots, drives and other inundation to avoid peak ...
surfaces into the Otay Lakes rainy seasons.
Reservoir.
Implementation of the
soakaway basin as described -
in the Surface Drainage will
reduce water quality impacts
associated with urban runoff ...,
contamination.
Cultural Resources: ...
No project-related impacts No mitigation measures are Important cultural resources
will occur to cultural re- required. are not present within the
sources. Archaeological project area. No impact will -
sites at the project site were occur and mitigation meas-
identified during testing as ures are not necessary.
minimal lithic scatters with -
limited ability to provide
important information.
-
...
...
-
1-14
! C; f} +-/0 I
010571000
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table 1-1 (Continued)
SUMMARY OF IMPACTS
Issue/Impact
Level of Significance
Mter Mitigation
Biololrical Resources:
Project development would
result in impacts to approx-
imately 3.0 acres of Diegan
coastal sage scrub and 0.1
acre of wetland that is pri-
marily freshwater marsh.
Impacts to both these re-
sources would be significant.
Indirect impacts to California
gnatcatcher as a result of in-
creased human access and
activity on the site is consid-
ered potentially significant.
Cumulative impacts include
the loss of habitat and poten-
tially occurring sensitive
species populations on a
regional basis due to in-
creased human activity on the
reservoir.
010571000
Mitigation .
A 2: 1 mitigation ratio will be
used for the high quality sage
scrub (1.2 acre), and a 1:1
ratio will be used for the dis-
turbed sage scrub (24 acres).
A total of 3.6 acres of Diegan
coastal sage scrub will be
planted on the two southern-
most slopes on the west side
of the Olympic Training Cen-
ter adjacent to the Salt Creek
dedicated open space. Sensi-
tive plant species should be
used in the coastal sage scrub
restoration if available. In
addition, all areas disturbed
by grading around the Olym-
pic Training Center boat-
house and access road will
be revegetated with coastal
sage scrub.
Since no areas exist around
the lake margin to restore
freshwater marsh habitat,
impacts to freshwater marsh
(0.1 acre) habitat shall be
mitigated out-of-kind by
planting native riparian tree
species along the lake
margin, outside of the
freshwater marsh fringe.
Implementation of the miti-
gation measures previously
described would reduce the
impacts to a level below sig-
nificance. The potential
indirect impacts due to possi-
ble erosion or material sliding
into wetlands can be avoided
by careful construction prac-
tices and implementation of
standard erosion control
measures. Potential indirect
impacts to gnatcatchers will
also be reduced to a level
below significance by re-
ducing human access to the
coastal sage scrub on the pro-
ject site with signs or barrier
plantings and by eliminating
access on the coastal sage
scrub mitigation area on the
Olympic Training Center site
across Wueste Road.
The cumulative impacts to
resident sensitive species and
loss of coastal sage scrub
will also be reduced to a level
below significance with the
implementation of mitigation
to coastal sage scrub habitat
and wetlands.
I-IS
Jtj//-/O.2
..
-
Table 1.1 (Continued)
SUMMARY OF IMPACTS ....
Level of Significance
Issue/lmpact Mitigation After Mitigation ..
Biolo~cal Resources (cont.):
The proposed mitigation Implementation of the -
areas shall be approved by mitigation measures
City of San Diego and City previously described and
of Chula Vista staff in con- any additional conditions ...
sultation with the U.S. Fish specified in the California
and Wildlife Service and the Department of Fish and
California Department of Game Streambed Alteration
Fish and Game. Agreement would reduce ~
the impacts to a level below
significant. U.S. Anny
COIJlS of Engineers has ...
issued a Nationwide 404
permit for impacts to
wetlands. ...
Traffic! Access:
Daily traffic generated by the No mitigation is necessary Implementation of the
project is not considered for day-to-day use of the mitigation measures will ..
significant OTC Boathouse facility. reduce potential parking
During small events (less impacts to below a level of
than 100 people), shuttling significance. ...
of people from the OTC main
campus will be necessary
once the OTC Boathouse
parking (38 spaces) is full. -
..
...
-
...
...
....
1-16
)cjfj)O}
010571000
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
intended that Table I-I conveys at a general level the environmental consequences of the
project and the underlying conclusion of the EIR. Section 3 presents each topic's analysis
in detail.
1.4 SUMMARY COMPARISON OF ALTERNATIVES
The alternatives matrix (Table 1-2) compares project impacts to impacts which would result
from alternatives under consideration (Section 4). Each alternative's impacts are presented,
by topic, in comparison to the project's impacts identified in the EIR. Section 4 provides a
more detailed discussion of the alternatives.
010571000
1-17
/Lj/J~/otj
'"
.
....
...
:c
~
...
"-l
fol
:>
....
...
<:
z
~
fol
...
...
<:
~
o
z
o
"-l
Ii!
<:
ll.
:11
o
u
~
l~
""'~
,,'~
.~J:
(5
!5
.'"
I
o
.. 00
N,,~
0: is .",'
o ""
"i ~ ~
j"'....
'-""
o "
~?;>!3
'~uj
Ii'll :;
- Iii 0
:;;:",,1'El
'"
il
l
~
g~
e.,o
0" 0:
'E ~'O
8a~il
'0 c: ~ ''='"> ui
0: ....."
'0" rl 6..j;
"3 ll'<; S ~
~8:U:g
'g
'"
.s
-
..
"
.,
.;:
o
z
.!l~'g
., ~'P'.i!
" 6."
.~ !5 'll il .
~ :a ill " :a
'i:l "" 8.~ 1i
-.S E> ~.-
s Vl a. s::; V,j
l!l.ll",g.ll
~"O.g~:g
!l'~ ~.~ 5
"'''...> "
'0 6
"''O.Ei"3.,~g
li'g U~:s "''ll---
ooi:l:~a:.......=ir:::8
.~ .~ I' .~ illl 8. :;(..
'i< Vl >..... = o::Ji
"i-gg~a~:a
g 'd ~:g !5 ~ I :1
:'J 6.."0 0 .... ~
~ :I 3 !l'..: l! ~ II
'" .= ".-.. i,
.s .g .~ ~ il.S oS ~:;;:
~~ h~~.H>.ll
. il .: Iii 0
.. ~-e'i:",,,,l!,,!i1'
a."O 0 00 . ~ .... oS .::::
oS oz....!l o.s,-o 0:
'C' 0: 0 ,,'" ?;>., 00:0
IS......... .. ~._ 11,) t.I iId....
'll 'lll!l 0 oou'" ,,'" l!3
~!t(,,)e:EtlO"Oca'-oa
ca<<l.u~l""!"3~ Q..
.~-.5!l'''' .= o.s ?;> \l
0:",'0 .,,, '"
:=: "3 '0';( " 'll '-' '5
" . 0 0:" _.!l '00:
!l Q) Z'::. iId 0';; ~"" .
_c;;>,.._ ><<1-
~'''"'--l!lo o-~
"'i! s.5 ~ ~.:l' \l IS::;'..
.s .... f5'.f '" ,,,is g ...8 6.
"
.:,:,oS "I '5
.= 8.g ..<5 :;;:oS ~
- "'ll Ii' 0 ,,'!< 0
~e~~~-g~;U:l6
t.g~~'ll :,5l~ g,.!ill
'g; i Vl e.8:'5!~~.!:l~ e d
:l .~ g.g a Ei "" 8 ~ '0 .s-~
.&:J>~ o>.ll ':::>ou
.<! g'Ci~ i~ il~.g ~.8';;
~'i.H.s gl~ ~ ~ ~~
Ol
.!
~
'il
~
-<
1-18
;1-17 -/()~
-
-
;g~
J!!.'O
,,-
.- "
000
g"
ij-
oo~
0'"
z.s
-
...
.:..: 5
r::: .:;::
0..
.~~
j~
~ .s
.'" 0
.....
~-e
-0
-<z
l
J:
J
l!l
~
'"
.s
'3
Ii
~
.!O
.fi
~
:I
l!l
~...
!l'.~
.~ [
""~
~8.
:I"",i
li ~
.s "" ~
.!l ~ ~ g
~'_''''.!l
!5[~t
:a ~ 00
~~U
~ Q..Qc:'.I.
'0 i
-g oo:si ~.~ e ..
".J3 !o " Ei lj ~
-cailca"O<<l;;>'
~~~~~]j8
8>'0:.",,, g~
_"'1l!!l!3i!_",
lj'll-.s" EO""
.~N:;"u-8O:lii,
0'''' 0 U .......
a.s '" '0 f-o 00.5':
....50000080
'~;Ei~~ fl; l~
::!i.ll"''''otlb'O,!l
~g-~~
~o ~s Ei
~'O'" lii,~
"a .... 'll
100;' .!l
.J3 !3 :I ..
~8~:E.5
~ ~ 00'''' Ei G
".I;.5.!j.ll ""
o!l:E'='-arl
..:l<!ltl.l!3" !l
.
'"
.'"
..
'"
~
U rg
Ol 0
'~i
~?;>
..: .-
e.!l ~l~
~~.s .9
" 00 "
o.~ g !o
at:.~ ZJ 'cu
"Ei".:!.;;
.~;!.~O
~:=scSZ .
U:>l'll~.!;'
".5 ~~ lj.s
:E '" ~ Ii'p' e
F~CQ:s!a.~
-
-
...
""'ll" ~"
..s';; ~ ~ cu.s
:;; N 8..!!!>oS .ll
I;f.l == o.~ 5 "C:S
!l.g aEi:""3
".::t cV cu II;! cD 0
.~ >l .;; 6'" "
"C:S.::i .......::t
E g.. Ii il
t)!?:; 5 "C:S"~
".", "" oS.~ p
'Iii) a:l' ..: f:i a.
g F.5lj ~l"
(l.\l .,.~'" ~
0:;;: ~ [.s .,
...
...
"
oS ".
!5.ll.j; ~
~~U.1j
!E~C;~9
Ii ,..~ '6h :a
"0 ilS.J:::! 0:=
._.~...- 5
~U~'''lI
"'~ "" ~...
.s 8.~~ ~l
~ U.~:g [
-
....
...
....
l!l'O:l.5~~""" '-
lili iii gg~.", 5l'" 0
0: rl" a rg 'O's-a
.=.-oS ",000: ~
~oo f-'-"""
0.505' !l 0 ,,"'-
"0 ~ "0 e 'co:s! at:
> ~." - a 0 ~ 0 .
'g~:51 R'n:lil n 8
Ol_Eig 0:,,0 oa
'''''ll.l!3'O6'O~ u-.g
Ii:; ~"3'''"3'3~ "'ll'a
'0 - " 0 F 0 a'- "'- ..
"" e oS " Il " '" 5l .5 :,...
-
-
...
.!l
'0
~
00
~
...
...
...
I
I " !l:h II
0\1_ ~ !i
~ '/ij 'S 8 0 ~ .~ ~ llo5..!.'O'
II :l ~ ""z'':: ~! q "da
l ~~p,!l~ 8'S~!i.5",!l
I '3 ,,\1- ~ ~ Iii" s:; 8.....
~ II) ...... "0- ~.g~ iL~.ll~
01 "~!i<
'::I 5 <<l ...
1i.5,!l ~ Sf ;;- .fIl g '611"0 <<l '"0 5
"Ii :a oS;;~;;8.'
I .e~6 ~ ~.5 ~~~~';i~O'~
'" . ~ ~ ~
:00 8 -1 ",=,.0 "'4,)8-.;.9.
1 '" '"0 ~... us. S ~ i- g i ~ ~ ~ .~ ~ ~ ~~ .~ I
I ;;'':: :lo5 !l ~ ~ .
I~ ~.~ i1~ ~ :~ ~ ; .. ~ .Q l~ ~ ~ i h \I.~
~ ~ '" N ~ e .~ 0 11"
.2>1l 'h~~'[~ .~ Ii -;, ~ ~ '" ~ .~ ~ ~ "l! ! .~ ~ .8
"a'S" ~ ~
I .S &: ~. ,,- IA ~ .5 11 8 0 l;l'" 'S ~:z: ~ 'S ~ ~~
.. ~ .5 .~~ ~ oS ""01 -S" i'l~...~. -:l0l
C5 ... e'- (,,) .5 a Ol~.~~~"3]..~hi; ..~~
.~~" ~ l'll ~e .~ ~",,,,:I - """"~~ 0
~ ~o5 05 ~ e 0"'; 8'So~'e.5 ~"
I ' u 6 a.i 'Cd = ~ " 0
0 505..:: ~ Ol~.~.!l ""'l;;;ll
.. .. . 0" ,!l.ll'':: G ~~ 0 .~
N",~
<I.l 60'- ~_ co <<l e .~ [; ~ !~ ~ [;l ~
fol ::: .- lil:.. !l" ~ "U... "ll 0l''''1~1ii''~ ""
'g Ii ~ ~::::E...g- g fa} ~ u';J
I :> j"'''' <:>'.5 . ~ ,," oS <<l ~.9- .2e.~ -=.Iii o5.5~
....
... '0'5 .!l ~ ll. -~ 5-U(.) ~.ll ~ 'S ~ 11 &b~ ~ 8 ol
~:s ';I ~'':: ol
~ -< ~ ~!i i i Ilb '-.8 Iii.~ .g~- -iil'~.....o.llSl~
"Cl ~ '~uj ~"o,,~" .0 Ol"'o.~Ilii"oo5 e'~
.. fnp~ s " .~ 05 'S iI .8 ,!l.~ ~ ~Ol ~
I :l ~1~ II :J'1ii
.5 fol ""o",:l~ :l~o580l'" :rllll..::.2-
... :l l 8.= e',:: .,. [;l 01 al .lllo~~6O~.!i~0l
- <..c:::a:l " ~""
c .... " '" &'Ii eU: 0'" Iii ~5'~ Po. ... 0Cl J:: 0 ~
Q -< .g Z:!l "'._. 05 .s Sl !i ""< e ".s.g 0 8.:o:S
u I
I ~ ...
'" 0 ' 0 ~ as ~.8 -i'l4l ' . ~ Iii ~ s
0 .:.; 6 505.g ~ ~ ;~~ . !l Ii:" .-
.... z . o_U,8'.;::2 01 ",.';j .q
6 .~ ~... cooS <<I J"/ij <<l ~ ~'O ~ 1.~ ~ ~
.. 0 .~ lil:.. !l" e ~ u " G g .205 '" J~" ~ - ....." ~ ii .. s "".8
I :c <I.l .~ 8 ~::::E...g~ "'~o5~ ~.e ~ _....~ ",' il 0 Iii ~... -;j,"l!' .5"
<<l ;J 8"il <:>'.5 ~~" ~l1ol8G ~';IIlii~~;~:.a,!l~';Ig
... ....lO<: .!l ~ il. ll'~ 05:: :s
-< :: :5 i.ll'd'~o5 ~~.8I.s ... ~.';j 1!o5.ll ~ ~b N G,) "0 ~ oS :s:
=- .~ 0 " [8 ~-8- 'if 0 lir.l ~": '" ;.,e~ Iii a!l Ii .
:a ';10.. r11 i'l ~ ~ l~ ~o5~ '" G'S 8 ;., ~ ~~ ~ = r~ ~ ~!! ~ ~ ~ ~
I 0 l€ ! ~~ P ~
u -0 -l3:l g 8.:ll elo~,~ 03 -5 " i"3 .~ i ~ ii 'S .s ~ t
<z ~ ~.~8 ~ 'Il! z.d Ii ~!i;;..:lo "''''g''
=-Ii d.~ 8s 8.5 8 a !.'S.M &b'1l!
I ~ l~! ~ t I ,,,,~-
'Q 'O~,Dlal 0
oS ~ ~ 'S Iii.S;:! 2 -a ~ ~-s ~
l i~ 6s~ .5 ~ ].g ~~~~~~~~~H
I ~ ~ o5.!l'~ ]e 8-u 8 ~. ~.;;~ lXl.~St
J j:l,!lrh .~.S !;~J ~.~ -3'~ Iii ~ ,!l'~ ~ .
. all ".- 0 ~s 8 ~ is .Q 8 ~:g :111 S ~ .S ~ 8 i
~ ,ge,!'.l - s
. ~ '" '~8 ~ :l~""'~)1ii"8e~,,,,~ :l
~ . ~
I .~s i,:l.!l [0 ~ 0 .rS a 13 :E .5' ,5 ~!.:l
~ ~ o;:l s:::::::S G) ::I c..
~l~lU ~iH .s~ L'l' h.g ~.h~ ~.5'~
:l ~
I J ~ I I
"3 ~
I Ii ~ 0<:
.1 0<: 01
01 "
'SO
~ I .E! 0
e :9
I ::c III
I 1-19 J~IJ-/OtP
...
...
..-
o5g
II fl8:1j
i!.~ 0
l .51 ~ I ...
~ " ..
15 ~-
- ..
:!ill! i';
l:l ::s.~"'O
~ ~ [.8 ...
~ ~ fl
i g .. ..
" ",." 05 ...
o.!l .., !i '0 ~ . .5 ~ g
l~ :~ ~ ~'.c S > l; .
~ '-'.::l ~'l:I_ ~
~ 5.9 ~ .. ~n"[
.?;ol! .. . .. "3
c;'~ .6 ~ oS "'0 g.. ...
.6.t .. ';j g!a '" .!l0l.81
.. ~~ -al-rJ .0 ~
6 ~ ~ .- =':s :!il
U. 1;J:E ~ '':::: ::s 0..
.... 0 [
e~ ::>;.E..
...
0 ,.!l, ~ .!lll.!l
.... ~.5 ! "0 ~ " .~ .O':..~
<LJ ~.~.~
r.:l oO:;::l :s - J g"3 > B,'.::l
.~ ~ ;) iI' o'.::li'.'. ...
> ,geoo ~= e,.:
... 3"'.... !i~t f~~ ~~~
.... '0-5
~ -< 1:~!i .... u ~ <<S !i U
"Cl Z ';j u:l Ii ~ 05 ..~ "i';
... llI: ~ "1:J S C Go) a.- ...
= 5 ~ ~ .1:!a!l~8~~..!l~8
.5 r.:l _ 0 _.::l! ""a" -
- .... :;;:...1>< 1:" ":a<= !aoi.8!a
= .... .~ '" ~~ .~~ggo5'Oig.l!
Q -<
U 'is. ...
~ ~ .~
<'l 0 ~~"~:~l ~.~~~ 6 ..
. ~ ;..; 6 .~ ~ ~
... z " '.::l 018.05..3 ~:l0
... 0 o .. Ul B~WJ:~~ '-jl:.J ....~
:0 <LJ ';j~ :S.6flrJ':: ..lt~.6~.!l!a " 05 . . ...
o e.!l
'" ~ 3~ 111 U'~';~;i:ii~ ~.8 Q..'/Q
.... -< ~ .5 ~"i"
=- "3 .~
'.::l 0 - :!il ~ Ii ~ .~ e i... ~ 5 00..
::!1 ..... ~" ",i 5 o..~... .!l" ~5 ...
0 h .[ 8 i .g 0 'Q.";.8 g" .6 1: ~!i ....
U :;;:~ ~>.~cC)5U"O oSz....'g .~~~:
....::l:;;..::l~o5. ",g g"i" :i.~::I:S
~l!!..::l.e "0::1::>;".5.1005 :!
...
6
1 'l~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~Ii';gi ...
" 01" - .
I ~"'lfl.8 8
g i!H
~""5al.l!
. ~ f:' ~.~ ...
Ii c..~M.~.;;;
o 5 ~._-
.....6 eo
~ ...
1 ~
'3 ~ ~
I ...
~ ~
.10 '60_
~ 0'- ..,
o~ ~
.. ...
I><~
) '-/ It / /07 ...
1.20
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SECTION 2
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2.1 SITE LOCATION
The subject site is located in the eastern territories area of Chula Vista, immediately west of
Lower Otay Reservoir (Figure 1-1). Figure 1-2 provides a vicinity map of the site and its
boundaries. Figure 1-3 illustrates the site and its relationship to the Otay Reservoir,
jurisdictional boundaries and the City of San Diego boat launching facility.
2.2 BACKGROUND: OLYMPIC TRAINING CENTER AND BOATHOUSE
Olympic Training Center (OTC)
The Olympic Training Center site at Lower Otay Lake was officially designated by the
United States Olympic Committee (USOC) in November, 1988. The selection of the
ISO-acre site adjacent to Lower Otay Reservoir represents the culmination of two years of
planning studies. In considering the San Diego region, the USOC considered four basic
criteria:
. a superb year-round climate for outdoor training
. a major metropolitan population of sufficient size to support resident athletes
with educational and employment opportunities
. proximity to a major airport with competitive services and airfares
. a market area that could facilitate the expansion of USOC and National
Governing Bodies (NGB) awareness and athletic development
Over 30 sites in the greater San Diego region were examined by the San Diego National
Sports Training Foundation (Foundation), the non-profit organization that presented the
proposal to the USOC for development of the Center in this region. All sites were
measured against the needs expressed by the USOC for land size, access, transportation,
proximity to schools, colleges, jobs, and cultural amenities. After review of all potential
010571000
2-1
114 -lOg
..
..
alternatives, the Olympic site at Otay Lake was selected by the Foundation and approved by
the USOC.
...
The Olympic Training Center is part of the third major EastLake Community development
phase, EastLake ill. The General Development Plan, zoning and General Plan Amendment
for EastLake ill were approved by the Chula Vista City Council in December 1989,
facilitating the subsequent annexation of the 1030-acre EastLake ill propeny into the City
(annexation approved by LAFCO).
....
-
...
OTe Boathouse
..
The proposed boathouse was an integral component of the OTC from inception. The Chula
Vista/Otay Lake site was eventually chosen, due in part to the ideal waterfront opponunities
provided by the Lower Otay Lake. Such conditions of available, partially disturbed land
adjacent to waterfront acreage for canoeing, kayaking and rowing are rare conditions in
southern California, and were determined by the USOC to be a critical component of a
comprehensive year-round Olympic training facility.
..
..
...
The boathouse site would have been included in the OTC SPA Plan EIR (EIR 89-11,
certified 4190), however the site was not intended to be annexed into the City of Chula
Vista (refer to Introduction Section, Project History for detailed discussion). With
LAFCO's decision to annex the entire OTC and Boathouse site into the City of Chula Vista
(1990), the boathouse site became under the jurisdiction of Chula Vista. Site design plans
for the boathouse facility Conditional Use Permit (CUP), the subject of this SEIR, are now
under review by the City of Chula Vista.
-
..
...
2.3 PROJECT OBJECTIVES
...
The purpose of the OTC, as described in detail in EIR 89-11,-is to provide a complete
training suppon system for athletes who desire to achieve their maximum potential in the
Olympic games and other international athletic competitions. The boathouse facility is a
critical and integral component of the OTC, allowing for year-round water spons training in
the overall OTC suppon environment. The boathouse would provide the storage,
launching and suppon base for canoeing, kayaking and rowing spons associated with the
OTC training objectives. Without the boathouse facility these water spons activities of the
OTC would not be possible.
-
..
..
...
2-2
)L/1 / lei
010571000
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The U.S. Olympic Committee (USOC) recognizes that the Lower Otay Reservoir is first
and foremost a resource for potable water for the citizens of San Diego. The reservoir/lake
also serves as a recreational resource for fishermen, recreational motorized boaters,
waterfowl hunters, sailors and recreational rowers and paddlers. The USOC and
Foundation recognize these uses as important in maintaining a future well-rounded mixture
of lake uses. The Facilities Management Plan (Appendix B herein; FMP) also recognizes
the need for, and commits to engage in, proper management and cooperative efforts to
maintain successful lake activities. An objective of the OTC Boathouse program is
therefore to attain a harmonious relationship with the other recreational uses of the lake.
2.4 PROJECT COMPONENTS AND CHARACTERISTICS
Physical Characteristics/Components
Figures 2-1 through 2-9 illustrate the Boathouse site plan, dock facilities, proposed grading
and other components of project design. The site encompasses a total of 3.1 land acres and
0.07 water surface acre (for the dock and ramp). The modular dock facility will cover
approximately 3,000 square feet (0.07 acres) of water surface, and is described below and
illustrated in Figure 2-2. Vehicular access is provided by Boathouse Road from Wueste
. Road; pedestrian access is also facilitated by the pathway from the OTC eastern edge to the
boathouse (Figure 2-4). As shown, the boathouse is designed to be integrated into and
efficiently connected to the main OTC site and facilities to the west.
Figure 2-4 illustrates the project's Landscape Plan. The project proposes a total grading
area of approximately 3.0 acres, including 2.4 acres of previously disturbed land and
0.6 acres of undisturbed area. A total movement of 12,000 cubic yards (c.y.) of fill and
2,000 c.y. of cut will be required for the project. An additional 0.1 acres of wetland fringe
area will be disturbed to create the sand pathway for lake/dock access. The project includes
a parking lot area of 0.3 acres (13,312 square feet). A total of 3.6 acres of Diegan coastal
sage scrub will be planted on the two southern most slopes on the west side of the Olympic
Training Center adjacent to the Salt Creek dedicated open space. In addition, all areas
disturbed by grading around the Olympic Training Center boathouse and the access road
will be revegetated with coastal sage scrub.
010571000
2-3
;t/I) / //0
7':;:-~~T
,
;'
/
y Z
;1- <
I~~
"OW
, Cl '"
zO
;::....
"'c
-<
~ii!
I
i
~
l
w
zcU
o z
~~W
~~~
"'-z
Q..Z::i
::t<z
::>"'-
Wo o..O~
---lr<C( 000
=.10.. zwo
COw ::>COw
91- 001-
o~ I 0:~8<IJ:
Zu'ClO
Wz 0:0
IO Ww..J
000 ~o~
h ::> :>
'(
! fil~
! ~ '"
, o..w
. ::t t:
8z
w~
CCl
w
....
z~
ffi",
c<
wCl
~~
~~
u
w
C
I
~.
'"
::;
...J
ll!
....
...J
~
~
------"i
w
'"
5
:J::
....
~
v
~' ir ~
; ~w
u",
.~ Wo
,o",OZ
~: ~ wO
!: ~ 00 0
'50
:J::W
....3;
~~
~
,j
Ii
i
1",1
I U.
,
pp
,<>-,0<1
2-4
,,-.........
, \
\ '1.......1
" /
......._'
)
~.~
f3
wz
"'-
....;i
Clw
z'"
;::0
"'....
x
w
,
/
I
,
,---....
"..---,
/ I
, ,
, I
, ,-
,----'
w
"w~
""u
:5",
Q~
:J:::5
....'"
~w
co..
ZW
C1i8
w
) It-IJ/
-
r.l
~~ g:: 1""1
"''''ddo ~
0).,...<<< I
"'~co!lj!1t) C ~
;. co....a: . C'f
.,...C\IOOC') -
CiSd":~lf! '"'
z09_<
9~Cl~~
- Z C
::::l -",
m >l:CZ
!,1fzS
I1.SC
C gS
z
w w~
Cl Clw
~ ~>
I-w
za:
S
11.
c;!
S
Ci.i
~
a:'
::::l
l-
e
0 ~
..
GI
~ -
Iii in
w
u.
0
...
...
-
-
-
...
-
-
-
...
...
...
...
+
-
i
"8
~
..
}
~
I
w
u
'"
::>
~
...
...
Z.
LI.I .
c:I.
c::I .
CD.
....
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
co roll
..
=: ~
~ .... ;;l
w ,
w "
lL ~
..
co ro.
/'7
",
'~
J-Z
Ill!
is .
"'''
=> ,
~~
of
t
~~
~*
- -!l dl
!l "'- \jl--,,,
li>: 0
r ~-' -;;--
Ct.a is :...-\ 1O
Il:ll tt. I 2 _,
rl ~\\ -C ~
-'l~ "'~ ~
~T
. l~t
=. ~ ~~
-" ~I dll
of)
~-'!
"
"'~
, '. "i.-
~""'.""~
!!o. ),.~
\. ~~.,. ",~
)~ ~ii::'1"*'"
"\ ..'>rl
,,~~\\\~q
/:1' /---- !!'\\
" - II \
'1 I \i! \\
f-~I ~I
-/\ I. ~h! ~
,,!~
~~~
li~
~
"''''
2-5
IY IJ /1/..2
C
to
ii:
...
8
c
z-
1,&,1-
a-
c.:I -
CD-
...
.. \
-
+8 .+f -
HY'IO"
.' 514.2'
i '..,.
t'
+'" .
I . . ", ,
I ',\' -,'
. r ~ \ 'MD01R_
I ,;. ,',
, -
_.-~_ I
-
-
(
-
.'
-
i I
"-', I;"
, ,
-
\.
,
\
i
I:
II
i I
I
-
".i-", .~
...
r;'~O'...
"'~f"
[...... . .1.0 ...
./~~
tJ rt"':- 1"'_01/ :)-
'. .
-
-
I;
_ ; _:I r'........./ :
,/~ '., ~:r;:-;;;~-~<'C~ / f/
I ~-:. .7F ....... "" /,/ .. ". .'
I ~.... '- '-. ......- "I "
~---;"'/'",\. -, ~,
..-1, 0.'........ '-_. . .
, " r --, ~. cS: - , ~ / _
,{\ .
-
-
-
'".,
Q
-
-
SOURCE: Tucker, Sadler & Associates
.
.
I~I ...~
,
OGDEN
Grading and Utilities Plan
)LIft/II)
FIGURE ...
.....
2-3
...
2.6
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
EXISTING DIRT ROAD
NEWCOTTONWOOD TREES WITHIN
WE7lAND FRINGE
EXlSTNG vmETAOONTOREAIAIN
SANDPA1HWAY
. FOR~AOCESS
- -
- "':-<\. - / /
~~,\\~~~>..,
-......:
- ...
EXISTING
~ COASTAL..SAGEJ
VEGETATION - _
(, I. ,.... "..
. \\~~. , .
" 'n' -.,.~.'-- '- '.
" ,\ ,"'"" '\ ..
\ \ ' I ..... . '- ~ '.
" " r---..-,\-'
; f . //./ ~ ...... I' - I
o
,
Q
160
,
OGDEN
.....
FEET
FIGURE
rIA -/)5~1
Landscape Concept Plan
2.7
r--"--
o
J
,;'"-
~~~1~'-~ ~ .~,-~--:O:,,~-L:;; "1-:';~-
I 'l-_ ~------------~---------
I,'"
"L;==
':,~
! I
',""~'-
::---
~i :-'1 ,;
11:--
"'"
, I:
, ( ~r
,!--
i Ii
----..-I------io;--------
tc>~ootco==>1!~o,====<='
,I
,.
Ii
t~i~>
,1;-
~' '0:
~ ~'.
'id!
,~ tl
i~ ,-
117
"f
b ~I
'~;;
, .
I I i ~
~ ~ -<' ~
i ~t": i
h',-
"
l
""I
; la, ~
Illf-
. :)t-
; '+-
I' ~I ~,
, ~, I.
u:f
-,L
o
q.
0'
0'
o '
i!
~i
.::.::.::i~.::.::_________"
~
[;:~;;;~-;:~i;;;;~I;;~;;:~:;;;;;J
c----------------~-----------------~
,<-- .<-.
.....----
.",,,,,-
!
,j
i1
~;
CD
z
~
~
.
~
.
.
2-8
I~!
" I
~~ J, _ _
l
I
I
...,';
z
<
.
8
.
-
...
....
....
....
....
...
....
C
III
ii:
-
o
o
II:
'a
c
'"
..
o
o
ii:
...
....
-
it
~ :
l'
;
...
-
...
...
!
'S
~
..
Ji
~
~
...
...
Z.
1.1.I.
~.
C::h
a.
-
i "
"I
'i
'I'
Ii,'
,I" 'r
w
(,)
II:
::l
Sl
...
IV /J - J)ft
I
~
I ~
;l co
I
" e\I
I -
~ ~
I
r../
I
I
I I
I me !I
I III
C
0
I i
iii
ICll
C
I :2
'S
III
I EE
Ie
I WD
la
I IC
mer
I we ..
me "
..
."
. . i ~
I II II EE
I ~I ~
~l .jl I ~
0 Z.
~
.... ..... .
w
I () IC:II .
IiI) il a: c.::I .
:::J
0
en c::I .
I 2.9
FEET
OGDEN
FIGURE
/1/}-l/i
Training Course
2-7
.....
2-10
-
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
1200 ...
,
...
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I OGDEN
.....
I
~~:~
..~'O,AY ~
~~
-..r""
, .~
~>
~. )
f
Time Trials Course
Fl4-11;
'::J
FIGURE
~
FEET
2-11
w
z
::;
~ ~
~ ~
~ ~
<
,
/
i
I
I
i
i. \
".\
, /
,-
_Iq
!
,.......--4=
w W
00001
II: II:
8 g
~ ~
< -
_ z
fE -
w ~
::;;
1= " z l(
II: ::; ~
~ ~ ~
~ 00 Z
I- -
<
~ 2 .
o
::l
...
w
Z
II: ::; 0 ~ l
~ w
~ 0 "
OlD ...
:i 00 ~ ," ;J 0)
~ tc " - I
, .. "
_w e'I1
~ ..;i - ...
~o
<00 r..
::l 0-'
00<
-'!Z
~o ...
-N
1--
II: II:
~~
...
~
IX)
:5
~
~
w
-'
u:
~
~
I-
~
W
...
...
...
z
Q
t;
w ...
00
-' !
<
z J
c
F= ...
a ~
z
9 8
...
~
w
00
~
o
...
...
...
...
..
J ...
..
}
~
..: ...
)L(17 ~ 1;J-1J ~ z-
oii LI.I -
0 -=:I- ...
a:
=> c::I _
2-12 ~ CD-
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The project consists of the following components:
The Boathouse Facilitv
The facility is proposed as a single-story, 14,199 square foot (sf) structure (not including
the deck). The structure will be composed of the following elements:
. BoatlCanoe/Kayak Storage (5,509 sf). Rowing and paddling are each given
2 112 bays for storage, which is the minimum requirement for the programs.
Rowing bays are 80 feet deep; canoe/kayak bays are 60 feet deep (Figure 2-8).
The 112 bay for each program will serve two additional purposes: one of
"warm-up" room (stretching, focus strength training, etc.) for up to 30 athletes;
the other use will be a briefing/video room function which must accommodate
up to 30 athletes, coaches and various equipment.
. Repair Shop (1,983 sf). The repair area will be shared by both rowing and
canoe/kayak programs. With a minimum width of 24 feet, the area allows for
two of the largest boats (eight-man training shell) and benches on each side.
Counters, storage bins, metal and woodworking tools and other materials will
be housed in this shop area.
. Equipment (1,419 sf) and Storage (1,115 sf). Each program is given an area
for storage of items such as spare boat parts, rigging, buoys, and equipment
such as cables, slings and saw horses, etc.
. Lockers/Showers (2,417 sf). Men's and women's shower/locker room
facilities are provided for year-round training. The facilities will accommodate
up to 80-100 athletes of each sex.
. Offices (560 sf). Four offices are required for the programs, providing space
for: rowing coach, canoe/kayak coach, boathouse coordinator, and water
spons trainer.
010571000
2.13
Jf/1- )el)
...
-
. Mechanical room (19D sO and telephone/electrical (114 sO. Fans to ventilate
storage and repair areas, a boiler room for the heating system and electrical
storage area are required.
-
-
. Corridor/Circulation (892 sO. Additional space is provided for interior
circulation.
-
. The entire building will contain an automatic fire sprinkler system.
-
. The Fire Station Master Plan shall be in place and the Fire Threshold Standard
will be met.
..,
. Fire hydrants of the commercial type will be required with adequate fire flow.
..,
l&l;k
..,
With a size of 26,621 square feet, located in front, back and side of the boathouse, the deck
will be used primarily for preparing and cleaning boats. A special drainage system will be
installed to divert runoff away from the reservoir and into a soakway, where stormwater is
f1!tered to separate out particulate matter and prevent its runoff into the lake. The deck will
be situated at the same elevation as the boathouse (Figure 2-1); the sand pathway will
provide access from the deck to the dock and lake (see below descriptions).
-
-
..,
Sand Pathwav to T .like
..,
A D.l-acre sand pathway will provide pedestrian access for the athletes and their boats to
the dock. Boats will be carried by hand to the lake where launching will take place. It is
expected that the D.l-acre area will be identified as a wetland. A Nationwide 404 permit
has been issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for this impact to wetlands. A
landscape barrier will establish the parameters of the path and discourage disturbance of
adjacent wetland areas.
..,
-
..,
~
-
The dock will consist of a system of portable interlocking modules, each weighing
approximately 14 pounds. The dock facility will cover approximately 3,000 square feet
..,
2-14
)Ljf)~);)J
010571000
..,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
(0.07 acre) when all modules are in use (see Figure 2-2). The modules are made of high
density polyethylene; a weather-resistant, non-toxic plastic designed to withstand corrosion
and splintering. The ponable modular system is specifically designed to allow for easy
assembly and disassembly to meet changing water imd weather conditions. Use of the
modular system at the Otay Reservoir will provide flexibility to respond to potential lake
level fluctuations. During lake level fluctuations individual modules can be added or
removed from the central fmger dock to extend launching boats away from environmentally
sensitive wetlands, or bring docks closer to shore for the least intrusion into lake waters
when the reservoir is at higher levels.
The floating modular dock will be connected to the shoreline via wire or line connected to a
metal rebar which will be driven into the ground at the lake's edge. The wire or line will be
connected to the module closest to the lake's edge. Interconnecting modules will be added
in a straight line, extending into the reservoir sufficient to reach the 2-3 foot depth of water
necessary to launch the boats.
Boathouse Road
Vehicular access to the boathouse will be provided from Wueste Road, across from the
OTC main facility site. The boathouse road will require approximately 1.0 acre of grading
in undisturbed coastal sage scrub habitat (refer to Section 3.6, Biological Resources). In
order to minimize this grading area in sensitive habitat, the road's adjacent slopes will be
relatively steep. The access road will have an all-weather driving surface with a minimum
width of 20 feet with a maximum grade of 15 percent. The road will also-provide adequate
turning radius for fire apparatus. The road will be of decomposed granite, from the
entrance at Wueste Road to the boat house parking lot. An entrance monument/sign will be
located at the Wueste Road entrance.
Parkin~ Lot
A 0.3-acre (13,312 sf) parking lot will provide 38 parking spaces. The lot will be located
to the west of the boathouse, constructed of decomposed granite. The lot will serve the
daily year-round training athletes living or staying offsite, coaches, trainers, and a limited
amount of trailer loading and unloading of boats (no overnight trailer parking permitted).
The camp-training athletes and year-round onsite/training athletes will walk, bike or be
shuttled to the boathouse from the OTC Center and will thus not utilize the parking lot.
010571000
2-15
JLjI) /1))
..
..
Trainin~ and Time Trials Courses
..
A 2,OOO-meter training course and time trials course will be located in the western (lower)
leg of the reservoir. The course begins about 600 feet north of the inlet structure of the lake
and ends just west of North Point (Figure 2-7). The course consists of a series of buoys in
a double line, spaced 100 meters apart. When not in use, the cable lines rest on or near the
bottom of the lake; when the course is in place, the lines are raised to about 6-10 feet below
the surface by hooking a series of buoys which float to the top, serving as course markers.
The course is designed to enable other boats to cross the course easily and safely. The
course is anchored at the shoreline.
..
...
...
..
The training course will be in place all year, being dropped to the bottom of the Reservoir
when necessary (i.e., due to special events being held by other recreational users). When
rowing or canoe/kayak time trials (i.e., trials to select teams) are held at the Reservoir, up
to six additional cables will be raised and additional buoys will be attached, spaced
approximately 12 meters apart (Figures 2-8 and 2-9).
..
...
Sewa~e Pump Station
...
The pump station will be a small structure located adjacent to (immediately north of) the
boathouse. The pump station is to pump sewage generated by the onsite facilities through
dual, 4-inch sewer force mains west to the OTC system. If the primary pump brakes down
the secondary pump will automatically kick in. Also, if one main becomes blocked, flows
can be diverted to the second main. Other engineering safety elements of the system are
described in the Boathouse Project Description prepared by the project applicant which is
on file with the City of Chula Vista Planning Department.
...
..
..
..
Observation Area IFie:ure 2-4)
The main land-based observation area (0.5 acre) will consist of a small turf area just to the
east and southeast of the structure. This area will also serve as a warm-up area for the
athletes.
...
..
...
...
2-16
)7;1/)J-~
010571 000
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Native Revee:etation and Landscaninl! Areas (Fie:ure 2-4)
Landscaping will be planted throughout the site, to mix and transition the boathouse area to
the natural surroundings. Native species and indigenous trees will be planted around the
building site, and revegetation of coastal sage scrub related species will occur on the two
southern most slopes on the west side of the Olympic Training Center adjacent to the Salt
Creek dedicated open space. Sensitive plant species should be used in the coastal sage
scrub restoration if available. In addition, all areas disturbed by grading around the
Olympic Training Center boathouse (including the access road) will be revegetated with
coastal sage scrub.
Facility Organization and Operations
Orl!anization
The Boathouse Project Description prepared by the project applicant is on file with the City
of Chula Vista Planning Department. This document describes the needs and daily routines
of the boathouse athletes and coaches during their typical training programs. The Facilities
Management Plan (Appendix C) provides an outline of operations organization, allowed
athletic programs/events, use regulations and restrictions (operating hours, training and
competition courses descriptions, management and maintenance requirements and related
facility guidelines). Significant items are briefly described below.
The City of San Diego has legal authority over all operations of the reservoir; the City of
San Diego Water Utilities Department operates the Lower Otay Reservoir. The OTC will
be operated by the United States Olympic Committee (USOC). The USOC athlete program
will be run by the two National Governing Bodies (NGBs) representing the sports of
rowing and canoe/kayaking in the United States: United States Rowing Association (US
Rowing) and the United States CanoelKayak Team (USCKT). A Boathouse Coordinator
will coordinate activities at the boathouse for the USOC.
A Lower Otay Lake User's Council is proposed to be established to deal with the
interactions between the various user groups on the Reservoir. This advisory committee
would include, at a minimum, the OTC Boathouse site manager or designee, Lakes
Committee member, a representative from each of the recreational use groups (hunting,
fishing, sailing, rowing and canoe/kayaking) and a representative of the City Water Utilities
010571000
2-17
/'
}t(-A -/}3
...
...
Department on scheduling and special conditions, and provide a forum for potential conflict
resolution between user groups on a regularly scheduled basis.
...
The primary focus of the boathouse activity will be international competition training
programs. When the boathouse is not being used for such training, it may be available for
collegiate training and community youth and masters programs approved by the City of San
Diego and the USOC. The Quarterly Management Reports will be prepared by the OTC for
the City of San Diego to follow the facility's functions, and to use in planning and
evaluation of the reservoir's uses. The focus of the boathouse use is described below.
...
...
...
Operations
...
The boathouse will serve rowers, kayakers and canoeists who will train on Lower Otay
Reservoir in preparation for world class competitions. Use of the boathouse will be
focused on athletes authorized by the U.S. Olympic Committee and the Sports' U.S.
National Governing Bodies (US Rowing and USCKT). Although athletes will train year-
round, the training year is broken down into four seasons, with the most intensive training
during the spring and summer to prepare for competitions in late summer (competitive
season). Long distance and endurance training generally occurs in fall and winter months.
Qpemting hours would generally be from dawn to dusk with the primary training hours in
early morning (5 to 10:30 am) and late afternoon (3 to 8:00 pm). Section 3.1 herein and
Appendix C, Exhibits G and H provide estimates of the numbers of boats to be on the
water during these primary training hours, during fishing and hunting seasons,
respectively.
...
....
...
...
....
...
Training will involve athletes in boats, and coaches who may follow boats in a launch. It is
estimated that two to four, fourteen-foot launches with outboard motor will be utilized by
the OTC for coaching. These will be launched at the City of San Diego facility and kept at
the OTC docks. Gasoline will be stored at the main OTC site, and brought by truck in
"pop-on/off' tanks to the boathouse and dock. The tanks will be replaced as they run dry,
by simply replacing a dry tank with a full one, eliminating spill hazards.
....
...
...
Event~
...
Events involving more than 100 people other than OTC athletes and their coaches are not
proposed as part of this project. The applicant has stated that races and other events are not
...
2-18
/'-1 fl ~ / :LV
010571000
....
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Events
Events involving more than 100 people other than OTC athletes and their coaches are not
proposed as part of this project. The applicant has stated that races and other events are not
required for the viability of the boathouse. Any such events would require a special use
permit, which must be approved by the Cities of San Diego and Chula Vista. Any permit
event, which would require exclusive use of a portion of the lake, would require submittal
of information on the event, including projected dates and times required for exclusive use,
estimated number and type(s) of boats to be involved, and an estimate of the number of .
participants expected to attend.
The Cities would indicate, in approving any special event request, conditions under which
the event may be held, including requirements for event notices, course marshals, parking
and shuttle arrangements, special event signage and potential compensation to the City of
San Diego for lost revenue if applicable. In addition, any permit event to be sponsored by
the USOC, USRowing and/or USCKT to be held on Lower Otay Reservoir will require a
Zoning Administrator's Conditional Use Permit, including environmental review under
CEQA and determination by the City. Such review procedures are separate from this
SEIR.
Small events such as "speed order" (similar to a scrimmage) or team selection "trials" may
be desired by the OTC and are permitted under the CUP. These small events would
generally involve only athletes and their coaches. However, a certain amount of spectators
would unavoidably be interested in even these small training/trial events. For small events,
it is expected that up to 100 people (excluding coaches and athletes) can be accommodated
at the boathouse site, including the deck and grass areas designed into the project.
Shuttling of these people from the main campus parking area to the boathouse would be
required once the onsite parking lot (38 spaces) is full. Additional viewing for small event
spectators can be provided on the main site, at the boathouse venue overlook area. Because
the boathouse is near the course finish line, no other provisions are anticipated for spectator
viewing sites for small events. Some offsite spectators would be expected along the lake
and would need to be regulated (refer to Section 3.1).
In addition to event spectators, during the day-to-day operations at the Olympic Training
Center involving activities that provide for training of international competitors some
visitors will naturally be drawn to watch the athletes. Provisions have been made for these
010571000
2-19
J~)//-)) 7
...
...
spectators throughout the Training Center campus, including an overlook directly uphill
and across from the boathouse, adjacent to the athletic and throwing fields.
...
Site Manai!ement
...
The USOC will be responsible for maintenance of the boathouse and leased premises
(Figure 2-10). The USOC will keep the facilities in a safe and clean condition, free of litter
and safety hazards on a daily basis, and undertake all necessary repairs and regular
maintenance responsibilities associated with the building and site. All maintenance
activities will comply with all State Hazardous Materials (Hazmat) regulations, and County
Department of Health Hazardous Materials Management Division procedures, as
applicable.
...
...
...
No new boat fabrication will occur onsite. Repairs to and cleaning of existing boats and
equipment are permitted within the area of the boathouse building and deck which drain
into the soakway. Regarding the pump station, the USOC will enter into an agreement
with the City of Chula Vista for maintenance. The pump station will be designed with
adequate redundancy and emergency storage, pursuant to requirements of the Cities of San
Diego and Chula Vista, and in consultation with the State and County Health Departments.
...
...
...
2.5 DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS REQUIRED
...
The discretionary actions addressed in this SEIR include a Conditional Use Permit (CUP)
for the OTC Boathouse by the City of Chula Vista and a real property lease agreement
between the City of San Diego and Foundation. The subject CUP is a City of Chula Vista
requirement to implement the Boathouse portion of the OTC project. Subsequent project
implementation steps through the City of Chula Vista include Design Review, grading and
building permits.
...
...
...
The real property lease agreement between the City of San Diego and the Foundation will
be required to implement the boathouse operations. Figure 2-10 illustrates the leased
premises.
...
...
...
Jt/IJ-'} J-i
...
2.20
010571000
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
" [.r;l 0
... r:lIi
-
~ ;J ...t
tu" I
~ ~
...
lO.
"
~1
~
//
.~..
.~.'.~...
4
.~..
..
: ~~
"
~
,
;,
ii
'~ -:::
"'r
c::,;, " ,.,> .,r,___
"""'~"
(, .: .
I v ,
"r" ',,,,
' ..
, "
, I
I
. \~.: ,
.'
."
,
I ,..-~ \
".
~.:'"
1,\1/ ,
~ .t-
"'.' -- ,\
.,:., ,,""") ...... "J,::
\.
~///
"
2-21
co
l!!
<
'C
m
co
..
-'
z-
LI.I -
c::a -
c.::I -
CD-
-
-
2.6 PROJECT SCHEDULE
-
The boathouse is expected to be implemented during the OTe Phase 1 (of two phases),
depending on the time required to complete the boathouse entitlement review, lease
agreement and processing schedule.
-
-
-
..
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
...
z-zz
J L( fj / /'}r()
010571000
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SECTION 3
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS
3.1 RECREATIONAL USE COMPATIBILITY
Existing Conditions
Description of ExistiDl! Onsite and Surroundin~ Land Uses
The project site is currently vacant open space, fronting on the Lower Otay Reservoir
(Figure 1-2) and is included in the Lower Otay Reservoir recreational area. Land uses
immediately surrounding the site are open space (to the west, northwest and southwest);
the Lower Otay Reservoir (immediately to the east); and open space of the reservoir's edge
immediately to the south and north. Recreational facilities and land other uses associated
with the Lower Otay Reservoir include the City of San Diego boat launch facility (used for
fishing, hunting and recreational boating); the County of San Diego campground; the water
filtration plant at the south end of the lake; the San Diego Air Sports Center (glider park and
skydiving) to the east; and other passive and active recreational uses such as picnicking,
walking, jogging and bicycling around the lake. These activities are further described on
following pages. Wueste Road, which provides access to the recreational uses of the
western Lower Otay Reservoir, is to the west of the site. The developing Olympic Training
Center (grading/construction underway) is located to the west of Wueste Road.
SurroundiDl! Aooroved and Planned Land Uses
The area surrounding Otay Reservoir is currently relatively rural in character and
predominantly undeveloped. The general area is experiencing an urbanizing trend, as
development proceeds west to east from Chula Vista and nearby communities. The
following paragraphs describe some of these current and forthcoming potential changes.
As described throughout this SEIR, the ISO-acre Olympic Training Center (OTC) to the
west of Wueste Road has been approved by the City of Chula Vista (OTC SPA Plan and
EIR 89-11, April 1990) and is now under construction. The OTC and boathouse area were
also annexed to the City of Chula Vista (Local Agency Formation Commission [LAFCO],
March, 1990). The subject OTC Boathouse facility site, although not included within the
SPA Plan boundaries has been annexed to the City of Chula Vista and is an integral
010571000
3.1
lill/I}/
-
-
component of the OTC project. Grading of the approved OTC project (west of Wueste
Road) is completed and infrastructure is underway (March 1992).
-
Another approved land use change in the immediate area involves the expansion of the City
of San Diego boat launching facility (described above). The City's boat launch expansion
project has been approved by the City of San Diego (Negative Declaration and approving
documents are on file at the City of San Diego). The project involves the upgrading of the
boat launch facility to more efficiently accommodate recreational users and visitors to the
Lower Otay Lake. The project's grading and construction is currently underway (March
1992). The existing launching ramp, access, parking and associated visitor facilities will
be improved and expanded.
-
-
-
-
The developing communities of eastern Chula Vista (i.e., EastLake III, Salt Creek Ranch,
Otay Ranch) will unavoidably result in an increase of human use of the Lower Otay
Reservoir environs. The approved EastLake III General Development Plan (GDP) shows
not only residential uses but some potential commercial/resort uses along Orange Avenue
near Wueste Road, and a potential city park west of Wueste Road south of the OTC. A
potential University of California campus is also under consideration. The Otay Valley
Regional Park Focused Planning Area encompasses the Lower Otay Reservoir and
shoreline. The Park's Citizen Advisory Committee has identified public use as an
important component to the future park. These approved and potential commercial,
residential and recreational uses in surrounding communities illustrate the area's ongoing
and future transition from a uniquely rural environment to a combined suburban and rural
recreational area.
-
-
-
-
-
-
Description of Lower Otay Reservoir Water Uses
-
Otay Lake is recognized first as one of San Diego's water storage facilities. It is owned
and operated by the City of San Diego Water Utilities Department (WUD). The WUD thus
has primary responsibility of uses and activities on and around the lake. Uses of the lake
(other than water storage) generally include: fishing, waterfowl hunting, recreational row
boating and other man-powered boating such as kayaking and canoeing, sailing, and navy
helicopter rescue training. The following briefly describes the major uses of the lake.
Quantified data for the following items (described below) were provided by the City WUD:
boating tickets/launchings, fishing/hunting tickets sold, total lake annual revenues, and
waterfowl "takes" during 1990 hunting season.
-
-
-
-
3-2 ) cf fJ - } 3/),
010571000
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
City of San Diel!o WUD Boat Launch Facilitv. This facility is the most notable and active
center of activities on Lower Otay Lake The facility operates year-round. The site facility
is currently undergoing expansion and renovation to accommodate 'user's demand (the
expansion project is described above under "Surrounding Approved and Planned Land
Uses"). Primary uses of the facility and lake include fishing and hunting, with some
general recreational boating such as row-boating, sailing, sculling, rowing and kayaking.
Fishing season extends from mid-January to mid-October, open on Wednesdays,
Saturdays and Sundays. Waterfowl hunting season extends from mid-October through
mid-January (off-fishing season at the lake), open on Wednesdays and Saturdays. It
should be noted that sailing has been only an extremely minor proportion of lake uses (i.e.,
of total annual 1988-1991 revenues ranging from $123,000 to $180,000+, sailing revenues
were less than $200 annually). Windsurfmg is not currently permitted at the lake, although
it could be permitted in the future. Waterskiing is also not permitted (waterskiing is
permitted at other City lakes such as San Vicente Lake). These uses and additional open
days could be considered in the future.
Table 3-1 provides an historic overview oflake boating activities between 1987 and 1991.
Table 3-1 lists boat rentals (full and half day) and private boat launches, summarized by
year. The monthly breakdown of boating tickets for the same time period can be found in
Appendix D. Of the private boats launched, at least 90% were power boats (personal
communication, Jim Brown, City WUD, March 1992). Total boating tickets per year
ranged from 8,344 in 1990 to 12,249 in 1988. The peak fishing season is generally from
January to April, although most months are active with the exception of October,
November and December. Tournaments are held occasionally on Saturdays.
Table 3-2 provides a list of fishing and duck hunting tickets sold from 1988 to 1991.
Fishing is divided into "trout" and "regular" (trout fishing is popular on other City lakes
which were included in the inventory). The table shows trout, regular fish, duck and blind
hunting tickets.
Another source of hunting information is provided herein in Table 2, Attachment C,
Appendix H. Table 3 lists the types and number of ducks taken during the 1990 season.
As shown, of the total 843 hunters during the 18 days of operation in that season, a total of
1,981 ducks were taken (average 2.35 ducks per hunter), plus 125 "other" (coots, snipes
and goose), for a total of 2,106 birds taken from the lake environment in 1990. These
010571000
3-3
Itjf/~/))
-
-
Table 3.1
LOWER OT A Y RESERVOIR BOATING TICKETS
-
Full Day Half Day -
Year Boat Rental Boat Rental Private Boats Total
-
1987 3,299 1,568 5,795 10,662
1988 3,737 1,646 6,866 12,249 ...
1989 3,077 1,426 5,555 10,058
-
1990 2,579 1,367 4,398 8,344
1991 3,195 1,648 4,161 9,004
-
Source: City of San Diego Water Utilities Depanment. -
-
-
-
-
"-
-
...
...
;LjA" /3i
-
3-4
010571000
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table 3-2
LOWER OT A Y RESERVOIR
ANNUAL FISHING/DUCK HUNTING TICKETS 1988-1991
FISHING
HUNTING
Regularl
Adult Youth
Year
Trout
Duck
Blind
Total
1988
1989
1990
1991
16
26
12
7
26,047
21,521
19,483
18,784
2,478
2,226
2,112
2,531
552
680
831
390
372
441
503
272
29,465
24,894
22,941
21,984
Source: City of San Diego WUD.
1 "Regular" fishing comprises all fish but trout.
3-5
010571000
IY IJ - I>>
-
-
numbers illustrate, among other things, the popularity of not only fishing but also of
hunting at the lake.
-
Navy Search and Rescue Practice. The North Island Marine Field Search and Rescue
Practice Team conducts activities on the lower Dtay Lake. The Navy and City of San
Diego entered into an agreement allowing water rescue practice and helicopter water
landing/take-off operations on the lake. The Navy operations are not allowed on
Wednesdays, Saturdays and Sundays (open fishing days), and are further restricted on
Tuesdays during waterfowl hunting season (mid-October through mid-January). The
Navy operations are also required to stay clear of docks and buoys, conducting operations
generally in the center of the lake.
-
...
-
...
Historic Lake C'Alnditions: Water Levels at Lower Otav T ...1<"
-
One of the characteristics of Otay Lake is that its levels fluctuate due to the changing
amount of water that is available to the lake. The LowerOtay Dam was built in 1917-1919
to provide increased storage capacity (City WUD historic files). According to the City of
San Diego (pers. comm. 3/11192, Roger Frauenfelder, Deputy City Manager, in charge of
City water and sewer), the amount of water available is dependent upon a number of
factors, some of which consist of regional weather, the lake's capacity, and most
importantly water received from the lake's source aqueduct (regulated by a series of
"upstream" lakes and systems). A new pipeline (scheduled to be completed by 1995) from
Lake Skinner could increase future lake levels, however, even if the lake capacity
increased, future lake levels would continue to fluctuate, depending on the numerous
factors cited above.
-
-
-
-
-
Figure 3-1 provides a graph depiction of historic lake levels from 1950 to 1991 (Source:
Vick Bianes, Water Conservation Project Manager, City of San Diego WUD). The lowest
lake levels in this time period occurred in 1965; the highest occurred in 1983, as shown.
The data illustrate the typical lake level fluctuation characteristic of Lower Otay.
-
""
-
-
-
3-6
/11/ / )Jfr'
010571000
...
I r.l
LO g:: P""t
a> ;;>
I a> I
~ ~ tv)
..
I I>.
, 0
, a>
a>
~
I
I LO
CIO
a>
~
/
I I
/
/
/ 0
.- CIO
I --- a>
~
,
----
I LO III
GI
,... CO
a> ::J
.... III
I a:: Cl
~ c
~
0 'g
I OS
,... i
a>
....
ili'
I is
LO )
<0
I a>
I ....
I
I 0
<0
a> N
.... ~
I a.
~
0
LO 1
I LO 5
a> ~
.... ..
'iii
~
L._ 0
I -- j'
-- a
\ 0 ~
..- LO ~
..- a> '0
I .... 2:- Z.
0 0 0 0 u
0 0 0 .., C\I w LI.I .
0 0 CIO <0
.., C\I 0 CI.
.... a::
.... .... ::l
I J.33:1 . 3DnVD /L//J-)] 0 c.::I .
en c:I.
I 3.7
...
...
Impacts
-
Proiect Activities Summary
The OTC Boathouse project would involve sports training activities associated with
Olympic canoeing, kayaking and rowing. Figures 2-1 through 2-5 in Section 2 provide
illustrations of the facility and site design. Boats would be stored and repaired in the
boathouse, and launched by hand (carried on foot by athletes) from the site onto the dock
and lake (refer to Project Description). Training would take place both on the training
course (Figure 2-6) and over the majority of the lake, as dictated by the Facilities
Management Plan (Appendix C), City of San Diego and USOC. Some additional activities
including meetings and related office functions would occur in the boathouse; grass areas
and the ground level deck would provide viewing for coaches, athletes and visitors, and
warm-up space.
-
...
...
...
...
Trainin!! Schedules. It is estimated by the applicant that training will occur year round in
numbers and on a schedule generally as shown in Table 3-3. In addition to the below
training boats, between 2 and 4 launches will be utilized daily by coaches on the water.
During hunting season (mid-October through mid-January), OTC activities will be
prohibited in morning hours on Wednesdays and Saturdays when hunting is allowed.
Training time for rowers and paddlers is primarily concentrated in a few hours in the early
morning and again in late afternoon, with additional workouts occasionally during the
lunch hour. It is expected that the boathouse will provide team training for up to thirty
rowers and thirty canoeists and/or kayakers year round. Of these sixty athletes, about half
would live at the OTC main site facilities, and the other half would live offsite and drive to
the boathouse each day (thus the proposed 38 parking spaces). Training becomes most
intense during spring and early summer months, in preparation for the World
Championships in late summer.
-
...
...
...
...
...
Boat LaunchinJ:. Dock Confi!!uration and Course Training. As described in the Project
Description, boats will be carried by hand to the dock and launched. The dock will be able
to be moved according to lake, levels. This will protect the shore's wetlands and other
biological resources (refer to Section 3.6 Biological Resources for discussion). The dock's
3,000 square foot surface area plus an approximately 50-foot buffer surrounding each side
of the dock will preclude that area of the lake from any other uses (see below "fishing"
...
...
-
...
3.8
;Lj1-/Jr'
010571000
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table 3-3
ESTIMATED DAILY ROWING/PADDLING SCHEDULEa
7am
4pm
7pmb
15 boats
25 boats
30 boats
a Except during hunting season from Mid-October through mid-January: on Wednesday and Saturday
mornings OTe training is prohibited to permit hunting.
b During daylight savings time only.
discussion). The training course, illustrated in Figure 2-7 in the Project Description, will
be 2,000 meters in length and about 453,024 square feet in surface area, or about
10.4 acres (1.1 percent of lake area at current level) of lake area. The time trial course,
illustrated in Figure 2-8 in the Project Description, will be 2,000 meters in length and about
2.3 million square feet in surface area, or about 52 acres (5.5 percent of lake area at current
level) of lake area. Training would occur both within the course and in other areas of the
lake.
Conflicts With Existinl! Lake Uses
The above described OTC activities could impact the existing uses of the lake, and thus
present potential incompatibility impacts of the project. Impacts to fishing, hunting, other
recreational boating and navy activities are described individually below.
Fishin~. During fishing days/season, the OTC training within the 3-lane training course
could potentially conflict with fishing activities. The OTC training for time trials (up to
8 lanes) could result in ever greater compatibility conflicts. At launching, many fishing
boats traverse paths across the lake as illustrated in Figure 3-2, which cross the proposed
OTC course. This could be a conflict when OTC boats are training exclusively within the
course.
A variety of fish are caught on the lake (refer to Section 3.6, Biology). Many fish are
located along the water's edge; others, specifically bass, can move to different areas and
depths of the lake according to local fishermen (pers. comm., Kevin Mineo, City Lakes
Committee; Larry Bottroff, City of San Diego WUD). For example, bass have been
010571000
3.9
JL-I/j-/);
-
-
-
-
...
-
-
~
v" ~.::;
-", -:S,-r
.2. .J
-
,J'
-{
-
!F)
-
-
-
....
,-
-
OGDEN
.....
1200
,
FEET
F I G U R E
3-2
...
-
POlenIlal Use Conflicts
p(I1-I1/(/
......
3-10
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
known to move extensively in the summer, chasing "bait balls" which can move
throughout the lake; in the winter/spring they may be located in deeper waters; and in late
winter they may be in shallow waters to spawn.
In effect, the OTC course and dock would reduce the "open" area currently available for
fishing. The dock area is a known spawning area of the lake, and would not be available
for fishing. This will be an impact, but less than significant, based on the size of the lake
and other available fishing spots. As currently proposed by the OTC, fishing boats could
cross the course area but could not "sit" within the course to fish. In other words, if the
course was used exclusively for OTC training, fishing boats could cross the course at any
time but not fish within the course areas (training course and time trial course areas are
quantified above). This conflict has been expressed as a significant impact by various lake
users. The impact could be reduced by implementing measures 1 through 4 below. It
would be considerably reduced by prohibiting OTC exclusive use of the course on fishing
days (i.e., the course would be for exclusive OTC training only on Monday, Tuesday,
Thursday and Friday (see "Other Potential Mitigation" following). The inherent potential
impacts of these different lake uses could be further reduced by lake management as
described below under mitigation. The only way to completely avoid the impact would be
to prohibit OTC activities on the three open fishing days during the nine-month fishing
season (refer to "Other Potential Mitigation," page 3-20).
Humin!:. Similar OTC impacts with current hunting activities were identified during
preparation of the EIR. As mitigation to reduce this impact, OTC training is now not
proposed, and will be prohibited, from dawn to noon during hunting days (Wednesdays
and Saturdays, mid-October through mid-January). Further, in order to provide waterfowl
with continuous resting area during the wintering season, OTC training is not allowed in
the Harvey Arm of the Reservoir (refer to Figure 3-3 and Mitigation Measure #5 following)
on any days during the three month waterfowl hunting season.
Recreational Boatin!:. Sailing, row-boating, recreational canoeing and kayaking, and other
recreational water uses could be affected by the OTC training. This potential impact could
be significant during high season on open days (generally from Memorial Day through
Labor Day, on Wednesday, Saturday and Sunday), most particularly on Sundays when
families are typically on the lake. This impact may not be significant during low season
(i.e., winter), but on high season Sundays the conflict could be a significant impact. It
should be noted that most OTC training occurs in early morning and late afternoon; it does
010571000
3-11
1t//J-ItJl
~ ...
L1i~ r.l
!1f~ ..:
wZ '" -
Q (/)::l ::l
Z ::l:I:
W c...J e c I
Cl ~:: '"
w -~ - -
....I !!! a:
~~ ~
0..::
-
I
~
...
;'1//- /12
3.12
...
...
j ...
g' ...
i!
:!
g'
~ ...
!
~ ...
I ...
.c
~
..
...
-
...
...
Z-
LLI-
8- ...
CD:
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
not typically occur during the most popular recreational boating times which are in the
middle of the day. Potential conflicts could be reduced by mitigation below (specifically
Measures #7 and #8), and should be monitored.
Potential D&y-to-Dav Visitor/Observer Impacts. It is expected that on a day-to-day training
basis, some visitors would be drawn to observe the athletes, and could thus create
incidental "spectator" impacts (to habitat, to available parking, etc.) if not accommodated
and managed. The project site was assessed to determine the number of visitors or
spectators which could be accommodated onsite on a regulated, day-to-day basis. The
onsite turf area and deck could accommodate a limited number of observers, estimated at a
maximum of 100 people, provided they were shuttled or would walk from the OTC main
site. Additional viewing for OTC visitors would be provided at the main OTC site at an
overlook directly uphill and across from the boathouse, adjacent to the athletic fields.
Visitor numbers and locations should be regulated and monitored as recommended below
under Mitigation (Measures #6, #11 and #12).
Navv Rescue Trainin~ Qperations. OTC training and navy rescue practice both represent
lake activities competing for lake use. These two uses could be incompatible, depending
on lake management. If sharing the lake, the navy operations would need to stay clear of
OTC boats, as other boats. This could be managed by restricting OTC use to certain areas
during Navy practice times, or by other means (i.e., Navy operations could operate at
times other than the peak OTC training times which occur during early morning and late
afternoon). This is considered a potential incompatibility impact and should be addressed
in the Facilities Management Plan, and monitored as recommended in the following
Mitigation Measure #10.
Other Potential Future Use Conflicts
Lake Levels. As discussed previously, lake levels will fluctuate on the Lower Otay
Reservoir. Lower levels result in a smaller lake surface area available for water use. As
less lake area is available, use conflicts could become significant because the same number
of users would be using a smaller area. Consequently, as lake levels drop, the likelihood
of fishing boats using the OTC course becomes higher. Therefore the lake levels should be
monitored (refer to Mitigation Measure #9 below), and all lake uses adjusted accordingly.
Without monitoring and management this could be a future potential impact.
010571000
3.13
JL!IJ-/L/3
-
-
Future Potential Increases in Public Demand for Lake Use. As described earlier, the
surrounding area and region are experiencing urban growth. Future growth will likely
result in an increased demand for public uses of Otay Lake. For example, requests may be
submitted to the City of San Diego for permitting windsurfing, waterskiing or other uses
on the lake (windsurfing is not currently allowed, but if allowed in the future, could be
affected by aTC training). The atay Valley Regional Park Citizen Advisory Committee
has opposed the aTC Boathouse due to the intent to prioritize public use of the reservoir.
The Committee states that the reservoir and its shoreline should be preserved for public
use.
-
-
-
-
Future public demands could initiate desires to open the lake to the public more than three
days per week. Although the implications of these potential future demands are speculative
and not quantifiable, these future demands should be considered. Monitoring demands,
and considering future requests for lake use should be included in the lake's Quarterly
Management Reports (refer to below Mitigation Measure #12). As these factors would be
considered and reviewed by the City of San Diego and City Lakes Committee/User's
Council, the protection of public rights to the lake can be guaranteed.
....
-
..
-
Special Events. During preparation of the Draft SEIR, special competition events were
considered as a component of the aTC Boathouse project Although the usac may desire
events at the site, it has been determined that to estimate the scope of events, and more
importantly, the impacts of such events at this location, are not part of this project
description and therefore are not addressed in the SEIR. It has been determined that special
events involving more than 100 spectators should not be considered at this time and are not
addressed in this assessment. The applicant has prepared a "best guess" of special events
and provision for such applications, included in the Project Description under "Events."
Any special event could result in significant impacts (such as traffic/access, impacts on
native habitat, etc.), and would require separate environmental review beyond the scope of
this SEIR. The applicant would need to apply for a conditional use permit for each special
event and an initial study would be prepared to assess the environmental impact of such an
event (Mitigation Measure #6).
...
-
-
-
-
-
Mitigation Measures
-
In attempt to reduce the above described impacts of the aTC, meetings and correspondence
have occurred over past months (refer to Section 6, Individuals and Agencies Consulted,
-
3-14
)//4/ /1-/1
010571000
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I SOURCE: Tucker-5adler, 1991
I OGDEN
.....
I
RowlnglPaddling Area Unaffected by 150' Constraint /'
Jyf! -/tf~
3-17
o
,
450
,
FEET
FIGURE
~
...
...
Plan, and adherence to rules should be monitored in the Quarterly Management
Repons.
-
8) Public education: In order to educate the public of the OTC lake activities and thus
minimize use conflicts, the following items are recommended. These items should
be in place prior to OTC boathouse occupancy, and should be monitored in the
Quanerly Management Repons.
...
-
. An information sign at the lake turn-off at Wueste Road/Otay Lakes Road shall
be posted, identifying the OTC facilities and a radio channel from which lake
use information can be derived.
...
-
. The radio channel shall inform listeners of the OTC activities (i.e., training
times, rules of the lake), public use information (i.e., open days, tournaments,
lake conditions), ecological sensitivity of the area and associated protection
rules, and lake use rules which must be reviewed prior to boat launching or
ticket purchase. If this mitigation measure is pursued, funding for the radio
station will be determined at a later date.
...
...
-
. At the City boat launch, prior to purchase of tickets or boat launching, the lake
user should be required to read and acknowledge the rules of the lake. It is
recommended that this will be the responsibility of the City of San Diego WUD.
....
-
9) Lake levels: Lake level data shall be included in each Quanerly Management Repon
(derived from the City WUD)' to provide for ongoing monitoring of the lake
surface area available for use. Should lake levels show signs of continued decline,
the matter should be raised with the Users' Council and OTC, to determine potential
refmements to lake use regulations. This monitoring and potential resulting actions
should guarantee equitable shared use of the lake. Lake fluctuations and potential
adjustments in OTC training areas should be identified in the Facilities Management
Plan, acknowledging that the lake is for both public and OTC uses.
...
...
'...
...
10) Navy Rescue Training: the USOC/OTC shall meet with the Navy to determine an
equitable shared use of the lake. It may be that notification by the Navy to the OTC
of future days and locations of practice rescue will be adequate to reduce potential
conflict. This agreement shall be included in the Facilities Management Plan prior
....
..
3-18
JLJ/)~ Ii V
010571000
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
to issuance of building permits. The effectiveness of the agreement shall be
included in the Quarterly Management Reports, as necessary.
11) Facility Management Plan (FMP): Prior to the issuance of building permits, the
FMP shall be revised to include the above mitigation items. In addition, the
following items are recommended to be added to the FMP:
. Dock operations and OTC boat launching operations should be described.
Provisions to minimize impacts to the surrounding ecology (especially while
launching) should be specified in the operations plan.
. OTC motor boats (coach launches) should be quantified (estimated no more
than 4 boats). Provisions for launching (at the City launch site); storage (at
OTC docks, and when to be out of the lake); fueling and repair should be
delineated in the FMP. Fueling shall be conducted using the "pop-on/off'
tanks, which would be stored at the OTC main site and brought to the
boathouse when necessary. Only minor repairs should be conducted at the
boathouse.
. Athletes, employees and visitors shall be educated regarding the lake rules and,
imponantly, the sensitivity of the adjacent ecology of the area. Parking shall be
by permit only, and to load/off-load boats. Signs shall funher be posted,
subject to the review of the City of Chula Vista, at locations along the lake (to
be determined), to provide for public education and protection of sensitive
habitat. Maps shall be posted at the OTC site which identify protected and/or
prohibited areas. Walkways and trails shall be clearly marked (refer also to
Biology mitigation, Section 3.6).
. The OTC shall notify the City of San Diego WUD of any OTC event requiring
exclusive use of the course two months prior to the event.
12) Quarterly Management Repons (QMRs): The USOC/OTC shall be responsible for
preparation of the QMRs. Information to be recorded includes but is not limited to:
daily use of the boathouse facility including number and types of boats used and
schedules, any boat crossing conflicts, number of athletes each day, visitors, etc.
The USOC/OTC, City WUD, and Lakes Committee or User's Council shall work
010571000
3-19
/rflJ//tJ7
...
...
together to develop the scope, format, schedule and review/comment system of the
QMRs. These three entities shall comprise the QMR "review committee."
...
Items included in the mitigation measures above shall also be incorporated into the
QMR system. Future additional desired lake uses which may be requested should
also be considered by the review committee and reported in the QMRs.
...
...
Further, to obtain input as to the effectiveness of ongoing lake operations, comment
forms shall be provided to the OTC coaches, athletes and site manager, and to the
City of San Diego boat launch facility for input from the public (forms could be
provided at the time of ticket purchase, and filled out as desired by lake users). The
results of these comment forms shall be incorporated into each QMR and
reviewed/considered by the three reviewing entities, or review committee (OTC,
City of San Diego and User's Council).
...
...
...
Other Potential Mitie:ation
...
The following mitigation measures have been identified to avoid the compatibility conflicts;
these measures have been considered by the applicant, and determined by the applicant to
render the project infeasible.
...
...
. OTC training on the lake would be prohibited during all "open" public use days,
generally consisting of Wednesdays, Saturdays and Sundays. This measure, in
effect, is the "4-Day Alternative" discussed in Section 4, Alternatives.
..
...
. During fishing season days (Wednesday, Saturday and Sunday, mid-January
through mid-October), OTC boats will not have exclusive rights to use of the
OTC training course or the time trial course (identified in Figures 2-6 and 2-7
herein); the entire course area (approximately 52 acres when all 8 lanes are in
use) shall be a shared/open area to all lake users. This rule shall be included in
the Facilities Management Plan (FMP). Further, this rule shall be monitored
and its effectiveness included in the Quarterly Management Reports (QMRs)
required below.
...
-
...
'"
3-20
Fll1~/Llrf
...
010571000
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
. OTC boats would be prohibited from the lake in the fIrst two hours of the day
(from dawn) on "open" days, allowing for the majority of fIshermen to launch
and be underway prior to OTC boat launching.
. OTC rowing would be prohibited on Sundays during high lake use season
(generally from Memorial Day to Labor Day weekend). Kayaking and canoeing
would be permitted on those Sundays, since the potential conflict with public
recreational boaters would be minimal with the kayaks and canoes.
Alternatives
In the event that the above measures are determined infeasible or undesirable, selection of
the No Project Alternative would eliminate impacts and Alternative Location 1 would
further reduce operations impacts. Section 4 herein describes and evaluates alternatives to
the project. Alternative Location 1 involves the implementation of the OTC Boathouse on
the existing City of San Diego boat launch site and relocation of the City of San Diego boat
facility across the Lower Otay Lake to the North Point site. Alternative Location 1 was
found to result in signifIcantly greater biological and aesthetic impacts (at the North Point
site) than the proposed site, thus it is recommended to be dismissed from further
consideration (refer to Section 4). The only remaining alternative which would altogether
avoid these impacts is the No Project Alternative.
Analysis of Significance
The identifIed recreational use impacts of the proposed OTC Boathouse activities can be
mitigated to below a level of signifIcance by the above measures 1 through 12. The
impacts could be completely avoided only by selection of the No Project Alternative, or
with the implementation of the above "Other Potential Mitigation" Measures.
3.2 AESTHETICS/VISUAL RESOURCES
Existing Conditions
The aesthetic atmosphere of the site and surrounding area is that of the rural Otay Reservoir
and undeveloped nearby hillsides. The developing communities of eastern Chula Vista
(Le., EastLake) are located to the west. These communities are presently out of view from
010571000
3-21
Jt!/I-/c(9
-
-
the site and reservoir area; future approved and planned development may be visible from
the project area or western lake edge. Noticeable existing signs of nearby development
include Wueste Road and the developing DTC site to the west, the existing City of San
Diego boat launching facility to the south (undergoing expansion March 1992), and other
City and County facilities toward the south end of the reservoir (i.e., water filtration plant,
County campground). Figures 3.4-a and b presents photos of and from the site.
Figure 3-5 provides a photo key map.
..
-
-
Figure 2-2 (Section 2) illustrates the topography of the area, which is generally flat to
gently sloping hillsides. Dnsite and immediately adjacent elevations range from
approximately 480 feet above mean sea level (msl) at the lake edge to about 500 feet msl at
the proposed parking lot area. The elevations along the Wueste Road right-of-way
(adjacent to the site) range from about 510 to 520 feet.
..
'"'
...
As illustrated in the following photos, views from the site consist primarily of the Dtay
Reservoir (eastward), and its adjoining slopes and nearby hillsides (Photo I). Views
toward the site exist from Wueste Road (Photo 2), from the east shores of Lower Dtay
Reservoir (Photo 3 provides view from Nonh Point), and to an extent from Telegraph
Canyon Road (east of the reservoir).
-
-
Impacts
-
Proiect-snecific Facility Impacts
..
The project involves the development of a boating/training/storage facility and associated
lake activities in an area primarily characterized as recreational and natural open space
adjacent to the Lower Otay Reservoir. Given the natural aesthetics of the lake environment,
any proposed development in the immediate area must be evaluated for potential significant
impact on its rural character and visual quality. The following paragraphs provide an
assessment of this potential impact.
..
-
-
The project's visual impacts from public viewsheds (from Lower Dtay Reservoir; from
Telegraph Canyon Road; from Wueste Road) were evaluated by a review of building and
site plans, photos and field notes, and topographic information. Distant views are first
reviewed, followed by an assessment of direct visual impacts.
...
-
-
3-22
}rfl} / /50
010571000
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Figure 3-4 a - oversize
010571000
3-23
/'-!/}-/{;
M
"'00
~ ,Q
:0 o::Il
C I
- (I')
~
~
"'\
"
~
~
~
N
,;,
.
o
o
f
.
=
..
.
.
;0
E
.g
.
ijj
.
'"
..
~ :z:: -
" LI.I-
c:I-
c.:s -
c::::I _
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
.....
o
~
~
~
00
~
Cc::
o
~
C:t
-
<:>
Q
o 1000
, '
FEET
Photo Key Map
Itj/J-J.5'l
.....
3.27
...
...
Views from OtllY Lakes Road and Eastern Lakeshore. Distant views from Otay Lakes
Canyon Road and from the eastern lakeshore would be affected by the project, but the
visual impact would be less than significant due to the distant nature of the views. The
facility's visual significance would be softened to an insignificant level by proposed
landscaping (Figure 2-3, Section 2), and viewed in the distant context of the overall OTC
project across Wueste Road. The OTC boat activity on the lake would represent an
addition to the existing boat activity; the aesthetic nature of the proposed OTC activities
would blend with the current recreational activities of the lake.
...
...
...
..
Views from Lower Otay Reservoir. The boathouse structure and dock would be visible
from various areas of the lake's surface, primarily from the central body of the lake. The
29-foot structure would result in a significant impact to the existing views of the natural
lake edge from lake users on the lake surface. This impact could be reduced, but not to
below a level of significance, by lowering the height of the structure (see below
mitigation), and by proposed landscaping.
...
...
..
Tonol!TllPhic Considerations and Imnacts to Wueste Road. Public views from a portion of
Wueste Road to the project site and lake would be impacted significantly by the project, due
to the proposed structure height and the road's proximity to the site in the immediate project
vicinity (refer to Figure 3-5, Photo Key Map). The natural topography in this area slopes
gently down from Wueste Road to the project site and lake edge. There is about 30 feet
difference from the road to the lake edge and about 20 feet elevation difference from the
road to the building pad. Therefore, the 29-foot structure would impact public views from
Wueste Road to Lower Otay Lake. A review of the existing topography, site photos and
proposed plans (Section 2) demonstrate that the boathouse would be constructed at an
elevation of 494.7 feet; the existing elevation at the proposed building pad location ranges
from about 488 to 498 feet. The boathouse structure would reach a similar or slightly
higher elevation as the Wueste Road elevation, thus the structure would result in a
significant visual obstruction to views of the lake from the segment of Wueste Road in the
immediate project vicinity (roadway curve portion as shown in Figure 3-5).
..
...
...
..
..
...
It should be noted that the project location's visual impact from Wueste Road is considered
the least significant of the various location alternatives (refer to Section 4, Alternatives)
under consideration during the Screencheck EIR process. The structure's visual impact to
views from Wueste Road is nevenheless considered significant in any of the alternative
locations along the lakeshore. The proposed project's impact would be slightly reduced by
...
...
...
3-28
/~IJ/e;{
010571000
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
the proposed landscaping and design, as described below. The impact could be greatly
reduced by lowering the structure height (refer to mitigation below).
Proiect Desi~n and LandscllPinl! Considerations. The project's design is simple and
consistent with the OTC architectural theme. The proposed project is a single-story
structure, softened with wood. Planting with new indigenous trees and landscaping, and
revegetation with native species are proposed (Fignre 2-3, Section 2) to assist in blending
with adjacent habitat and the natural aesthetic atmosphere. These components will serve to
soften the visual impact of the boathouse structure.
Cumulative Aesthetic Considerations
Another factor in aesthetic impact significance involves a project's contribution to regional
aesthetic changes, and the level of cumulative development which has been approved in the
area. The OTC Boathouse is a component of the overall OTC project concept, which was
considered by the City of Chula Vista in the EastLake ill General Plan Amendment/General
Development Plan (approved in November, 1989); by LAFCO in the EastLake III
annexation (March, 1990); and further in the OTC SPA Plan (EIR 89-11, 1990).
These previous approvals identified acceptable development (residential, OTC and other
uses) and open space areas through the EastLake ill community, including the OTC
component of the area's development. The boathouse building plans were not included in
these analyses, however the overall OTC project was considered in a cumulative,
conceptual manner in the previous approvals. Thus, a certain amount of recreationaV
Olympic training development in the site area has been anticipated and approved by
involved jurisdictional agencies. The City of Chula Vista has, in the above projects'
previous CEQA findings, made conclusions of unavoidable cumulative aesthetic impact
from ongoing development projects in the area. The OTC Boathouse, although a minor
component of the area's development, would therefore also contribute slightly to these
cumulative unavoidable aesthetic and visual impacts, which are occurring from ongoing
development in eastern Chula Vista and the Otay Lakes vicinity.
010571000
3-29
J ljll ;' /5'k-
...
-
Mitigation Measures
..
The project's proposed landscaping and revegetation will reduce project-specific visual
impacts of the boathouse structure. The following measures are recommended to further
reduce visual impacts:
..
. As a condition of project (CUP) approval, the boathouse structure shall be
redesigned to a lesser height. Said design plans reflecting the lower structure
shall be submitted for review and approval by the City of Chula Vista as a part
of the City Design Review process, prior to issuance of grading permits.
Further, the City of San Diego shall be invited to review and comment on the
revised design plans, prior to approval of the project's City of San Diego lease
permit.
-
-
-
-
. Final Landscape Plans for the project, including revegetation areas, shall
incorporate species of a type and size (especially height) acceptable to the City
of Chula Vista Landscape Architect and City Planning Department. Further, the
City shall provide the City of San Diego the opportunity to review and comment
on the plans prior to final approval by the City of Chula Vista. This review and
input is intended to facilitate the blending of the project's landscaping with
nearby City of San Diego recreational areas.
...
-
..
. The USOC, or other entity acceptable to the City, shall be responsible for the
monitoring of health and growth of the site's landscaped areas and revegetation
areas for a period acceptable to the project biologist (refer to Section 3.6,
Biology). This monitoring is required to ensure the survival of native species
and revegetation areas. The monitoring shall be incorporated into the overall
mitigation monitoring program for the project.
...
...
...
Analysis of Significance
...
Distant visual project impacts from Otay Lakes Road and from the eastern lakeshore would
be less than significant. Project-specific visual impacts to views from Wueste Road
immediately west of the site, and to views from the lake surface to the western lakeshore,
would be reduced by the measures above, particularly by building height reduction. Even
-
...
...
3-30
;yll-/57
010571000
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
with this mitigation, project visual impacts would not be mitigated to below a level of
significance.
On a cumulative basis, the project will slightly contribute to the significant and unavoidable
cumulative aesthetic impact of ongoing development on the area's natural viewshed.
3.3 GEOLOGY AND SOILS
A geotechnical investigation was conducted for the OTC Boathouse Site by ICG Inc. in
1990. This geotechnical analysis involved an evaluation of subsurface conditions at the
site. A summary of this analysis is provided below and the entire document included as
Appendix F. Additional data sources for the following analysis include the soil survey of
the San Diego area and a geology map of local quadrangles (Browman 1973 and Kennedy
1977).
Existing Conditions
Geolo~y
The project site is located on the western shore of Lower Otay Reservoir and is adjacent to
the present Olympic Training Center. The site is located near water level (477 feet above
mean sea level (MSL)) of the reservoir. In general, the site is gently sloping toward the
reservoir and has been partially graded.
The project site is located on the Sweetwater Formation and small localized deposits of
ancient fanglomerates which predate the Sweetwater. The Otay Formation is
stratigraphically younger than the Sweetwater Formation and crops out on the uplands near
the sites. This entire region is underlain at depth by the Santiago Peak: Volcanics (Kennedy
and Tan 1977).
Otav Formation. The Otay Formation is Oligocene in age and crops out on the uplands to
the west and north of the project site. The Otay consists of light brown to light gray, fine-
grained sandstone, siltstone and claystone. Thin bentonite beds occur within the
formation.
010571000
3-31
/1111 / /5ct
..
...
Sweetwater Formation. The Sweetwater FOI1l1ation (Oligocene in age) underlies a majority
of the project area. The Sweetwater is stratigraphically older than the Otay FOI1l1ation. In
places, the Sweetwater overlies ancient fanglomerates; however, in most locations, the
Sweetwater unconfoI1l1ably overlies Santiago Peak Volcanics. The Sweetwater FOI1l1ation
consists of a yellow gray to brown, medium dense to dense, clayey, silty, well graded
sandstone, with local angular conglomeratic units. This angular conglomeratic unit may
represent the top of the fanglomerates. The Sweetwater is very dense and moderately
cemented (leG Inc. 1990).
...
...
...
...
Fane:lomerates. The fanglomerates crop out locally along the shore of the reservoir and
consist of large angular cobbles and boulders weathered from the Santiago Peak Volcanics.
The matrix is a medium-to-coarse-grained, light brown sandstone.
...
Santia~o Peak Volcanics. The entire region is underlain at depth by this volcanic unit,
which consists predominantly of basalts and andesites. However, breccias and tuffs are
also present The upper several feet of this fOI1l1ation is highly weathered and fractured.
...
...
Ene:ineerin,: Pronerties
...
The Sweetwater FOI1l1ation and the fanglomerates are considered suitable to suppon
structural loads. The Sweetwater material has good strength characteristics when used as
compacted fill; however, clayey portions are moderately expansive (for more detailed
analysis see Appendix F).
...
...
Seismicity
...
In general, all of southern California is in a seismically active area. However, there are no
known active or potentially active faults within the site area. Hence, the seismic hazards of
this area are a result of ground shaking caused by earthquakes on distant active faults.
...
...
Table 3-4 lists the known active and potentially active faults within 100 kilometers of the
site. Also listed are the maximum credible earthquake magnitudes. As indicated in
Table 3-5, the Modified Mercalli Intensity for the site area is vm (Green sf elder 1974).
...
...
Because no active or potentially active faults are known to cross the site, the probability of
surface fault rupture is very low. Based on the infoI1l1ation now available, the most
....
3-32
PI/) 150;
010571000
...
I
I Table 3.4
I SEISMICITY FOR MAJOR F AUL TS WITHIN
ONE HUNDRED KILOMETERS OF THE PROJECT SITE
I Distance Maximum Credible
Major Faults from Site Earthquake Magnitude
I
Coronado Banks 20 mi. SW 6.5
I Elsinore 38 mi. NE 7.5
La Nacion 5mi.W 6.8
I Rose Canyon 13 mi. NW 7.0
San Clemente 45 mi. SW 7.5
I San Jacinto 60 mi. NE 7.5
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
010571000 3.33
I ;r/ IJ - j(pO
Table 3-5
MODIFIED MERCALLI SCALE, 1956 VERSION
-
-
Mf
Intensity
g*
Effods
v, t cm/s
3
n.
m.
4
IV.
5
VI.
VIT.
6
Vlll
7
IX.
8
x.
XI.
I. Not felt. Marginal and leng-period eff.... of large calthquokcs.
Felt by persons by rest, on upper floors, or favorably placed.
Feh indoon. Hanging objects swing. Vibration like passing of light trocks.
Duration estimated. May not be recognized as an earthquake.
Hanging objects swing. Vibration like passing of heavy trucks; or sensation
of a jolt like a heavy ball striking walls. Standing cars rock. Windows,
dishes, doon rattle. Glasses clink. Crockcty clashes. In the upper range of
N wooden walls and frames creak.
v.
Felt outdoors; direction estimated. Sleepers wakened. Liquids dislWbed, some
spilled. Small unstable objects displaced or upset. Doors swing, dOle, open.
Shutters, pictUres move. Pendulum clocks stop, start. change rate.
Felt by all. Many frightened and run outdoors. Persons walk unsteadily.
Windows, dishes, glassware broken. Knickknacks, books, etc., off shelves.
Pictures off walls. Furniture moved or overturned. Weak plaster and
masonry D cracked. Small bells ring (church, school). Trees, bushes shaken
(visibly, or heard to rustle).
Difficult to stand. Noticed by drivers of cars. Hanging objects quiver.
Furniture broken. Damage to masonry D, including cracks. Weak. chimneys
broken at roof line. Fall of plaster, loose bricks, stones, tiles, cornices (also
unbraced parapets and architectural ornaments). Some cracks in masonry C.
Waves on ponds; water turbid with mud. Small slides and caving in along
sand or gravel bsnks. Large bells ring. Concrete irrigation ditches damaged.
Steering of cars affected. Damage to masonry C; partial collapse. Some
damage to masmry B; nOlle to masonry A. Fall of stucco and some masonry
walls. Twisting, fall of chimneys, factory stacks, monuments, towers,
elevated tanks. Frame houses moved on foundations if not bolted down; loose
panel walls thrown out. Decayed piling broken off. Branches broken from
trees. Oanges in flow or temperature of springs and wells. Cracks in wet
ground and on steep slopes.
General panic. Masonry D destroyed; masmry C heavily damaged, sometimes
with complete collapse; masonry B seriously damaged. (General damage to
foundations). Frame strucb1res, it not bolted, shifted off foundations. Frame
racked. Serious damage to reservoirs. Underground pipes broken.
Conspicuous cracks in ground. In alluviated areas sand and mud ejected,
earthquake fountains, sand cralelJ.
Most masonry and frame structures destroyed with their foundations. Some
well-built wooden structures and bridges destroyed. Serious damage to dams,
dikes, embankments. Large landslides. Water thrown on banks of canals,
riven,lakes, etc. Sand and mud shifted horizontally on beaches and flat land.
Rail. bent slightly.
Rails bent greatly. Underground pipelines completely out of servicc.
XII. Damage nearly total. Large rock masses displaced. lines of sight and level
distorted. Objects thrown into the air.
-
-
0.0035-0.007
0.007-0.015
-
1-3
O.oJ5-0.oo5
-
3-7
0.035-0.07
-
7-30
0.07--0.15
-
...
2().6()
0.15--0.35
-
-
60-200
0.35-0.7
-
200-500
0.7-1.2
...
>1.2
-
Note: Masonry A, B, C, D. To avoid ambiguity of language, the quality ofmasomy, brick or otherwise, is specified by the following lettering
(which has no connection with the conventional Class A, B, C construction).
Masonry A: Good worlananship, mortar, and design; reinforced, especially laterally, and bound together by using steel, concrete, etc.; designed
to resist lateral forces.
Masonry B: Good workmanship and monar, reinforced, but not designed to resist lateral fon::es.
Masoory C: Ordinary wodrntanship and mortar; no extreme weaknesses such as non-tied in c:omers, but masonry is neither reinforced nor
designed against horizontal forces.
Mascnry D: Weok material., .uch u adobe; poor monar, low .tandard. of worlonanship; weok horizontal1y.
t Average peak ground velocity, cmJs.
* Average peak acceleration (away from source).
f Magnitude correlation.
-
-
-
-
3.34
Jt/I} - liP/
0/057/000
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
significant event likely to affect this proposed project site will be an earthquake on the Rose
Canyon fault. Recent work on the Rose Canyon fault zone has indicated that strands
within the zone are active. A single trace has been shown to offset topsoil in one location
and appears to have created topographic features common in active faulting (offset
drainages, pressure ridges, enclosed depressions and fault scarps). The age of the most
recent movement, the fault's recurrence interval (expected period between major earthquake
events), the relationship between the active trace and other faults within the fault wne have
not yet been established (lCG, 1990).
It should be noted that the California Division of Mines and Geology (COMG) could
establish Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zones along the fault at any time. Upgrading the
San Diego area from seismic zone 3 to seismic wne 4 would likely follow designation of
Special Studies Zones by the State of California.
Based on the existing information available regarding the Rose Canyon fault, a magnitude
7.0 earthquake is an appropriate maximum credible event for a 20-mile rupture length
(offshore La Jolla to Coronado Bridge). A maximum probable event of magnitude 6.5 is
hypothesized for the Rose Canyon fault (ICG, 1990).
The La Nacion fault, located approximately five miles west of the site could produce higher
peak accelerations at the site. Although this fault has offset the Quaternary age Lindavista
Formation, it has not been found to have offset Holocene sediments, and is considered to
be potentially active. For construction engineering purposes, this fault is not considered
active (lCG, 1990).
Seismically induced slope failures, settlement, liquefaction, ground rupture and tsunamis
are generally not considered hazards in the site area. The project area could potentially be
inundated by a seiche on the Lower Otay Reservoir. A seiche is a wave of water which is
due to earthquake ground motion causing a closed body of water to oscillate.
~
The site is located on the Olivenhain Soil Series, which is a cobbly alluvium (Figure 3-6).
The project site, is located solely on Olivenhain cobbly loam (OhE), containing 9 to 30
percent slopes (Browman 1973).
010571000
3.35
F! fJ,j iP).,
-
/
i)
~
\
\
'.
oE \
DaD
...
:::-...~---
-~---
...
DaE
---~/
--
7/
!
/
/
/
f
,
I,
j
..
...
..
...
.
.
...
OhE.
...
...
...
...
...
..
i
i/
BOUNOARY
.... - .... """'---,....... -.......... ........,.-
...
HrE2
~.
, '"'"
Ql200
...
HrE2
\
o
,
..
FEET
FIGURE
...
.....
Soli Types of Project Area ) i /J / / b ]
3-6
...
3-36
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The Olivenhain cobbly loam (OhC) may be characterized as a gently sloping, low
permeability soil that has a moderate potential for shrink-swell. The erosional hazard is
slight to moderate and the runoff rate is slow to medium. The Olivenhain cobbly loam
(OhE) may be characterized as a strongly sloping, very low permeability soil that has a
moderate potential for shrink-swell. The erosional hazard is moderate to high and the
runoff rate is medium to rapid.
Impacts
Geolo~y
The potential geologic impacts pertain to certain problematic lithologies and the seismicity
in the project area. One possible adverse, lithologic impact may result from the occasional
well cemented, dense units of the Sweetwater Formation, which could cause difficulty in
mechanical ripping during construction. Another possible adverse, significant lithologic
impact might be caused by the clayey portions of the Sweetwater Formation, which are
expansive and could cause a shrink-swell effect that could damage foundations.
Since no active or potentially active faults exist in or near the project area, possible adverse,
significant seismic impacts are related to ground shaking caused by rupture on distant
regional faults. A Modified Mercalli Intensity of VIII could be encountered in the project
area. This type of intensity would cause stucco walls to fall and damage masonry B which
is defmed as good workmanship, reinforced, but not designed to resist lateral movement.
The potential for inundation by seiche on the Lower Otay Reservoir exists.
Scils.
Possible adverse, significant, soil impacts include shrink-swell or expansive nature of soils
and the erosional nature of particular soils. Both the Olivenhain soils (OhC and OhE) are
moderately expansive and could cause damage to poorly constructed foundations.
The Olivenhain (OhE) soil has a moderate to high erosive nature and bare exposure of this
soil during and after construction could result in an increased sediment load in runoff
water. This runoff water is likely to drain into Lower Otay Reservoir.
010571000
3-37
PIIl'lv 1
..
-
Mitigation Measures
..
GeoloiY
The following mitigation measures will reduce geologic impacts on the project site to below
a level of significance. These mitigations specifically address possible lithologic and
seismic impacts.
-
-
. Clayey expansive portions of the Sweetwater Formation will be excluded from
the upper three feet of subgrade to reduce the potential for damaged foundations
(ICG Inc. 1990).
..
-
. Buildings and structures designed as specified by the Uniform Building Code in
regards to the possible earthquake intensities will minimize the potential for
damage. Stucco walls and C-type masonry should be avoided if possible (see
Table 3-5).
-
..
SQil.s.
..
The following mitigation measures will reduce impacts related to specific soil characteristics
to below a level of significance.
..
. Problems due to expansive soils will be compensated by selective grading and
specially designed foundations as set forth in the Uniform Building Code.
-
..
. Erosional rates will be minimized through erosional control measures such as
maintaining vegetative cover and vegetated buffer wnes.
..
Analysis of Significance
..
Available geologic data suggests that there are no major geologic and soils constraints on
the subject site that would preclude development and no unmitigable significant impacts are
anticipated.
..
-
3-38
Jifl- jL;(
..
010571000
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3.4 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
Existing Conditions
Surface Draina~e
The subject site lies within the drainage basin of the Otay Reservoir and slopes gently to the
east, toward Lower Otay Reservoir. Drainage from this site can be expected to flow by
sheet-flow directly to the reservoir, or via small, adjacent ephemeral streams which empty
into the reservoir.
All of the stream channels which drain the site are ephemeral in nature, flowing only during
or immediately after prolonged or intense rainfall. There are no flood-prone areas on the
project site, although downstream areas of Otay River are prone to flooding (HUD 1977).
Existing flooding problems in the City of Chula Vista are largely confmed to localized areas
in the western sections of the City, where roadway culverts are undersized to convey the
larger runoff flows which have resulted form recent urban development.
The City's Thresholds Policy identifies goals and objectives regarding drainage: a safe and
sufficient drainage system should be in place to protect residents and property in the City;
individual projects will provide necessary improvements consistent with Drainage Master
Plans and City Engineering Standards, in order that storm water flows and volumes would
not exceed the standards. The City's Growth Management Oversight Committee reviews
the performance of the City's systems to determine whether these goals are being met.
WaterOualitv
There have been no previous studies on water quality characteristics of surface runoff or
ground water at the project site. The quality of surface runoff is expected to be typical for
runoff occurring within a natural grassland landscape. The ephemeral streams probably
carry a high suspended and dissolved solids load, dominated by nutrients derived from
crop fertilizers and livestock grazing. Ground water in marine sedimentary rocks in the
San Diego Region is typically saline in character. The Otay Lakes Reservoir is used as
storage for municipal and agricultural water supplies and is owned by the City of San
Diego. The reservoir experiences periodic algae blooms as a result of the combination of
010571000
3.39
IL/fl-;&~
-
-
high nutrient concentrations derived from both imported Colorado River water and local
surface runoff and high water temperatures (Ogden 1989).
-
The San Diego Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), in its Comprehensive
Water Quality Control Plan Report, 1978 amendments, San Diego Basin, identifies the
existing beneficial uses for surface waters of the Dulzura hydrographic subunit as
municipal, agricultural, industrial, water recreation, warm water fish habitat and wildlife
habitat
-
-
-
Available data, including the recent geotechnical report for the site (lCG 1990), indicate that
there are no substantial quantities of ground water existing beneath the project site. The site
is underlain at depth by dense, impermeable volcanic rocks. The topographic configuration
of the overlying sandstone deposits indicates that they could not contain a large quantity of
ground water in a saturated condition. There are no wells on the project site. There were
no springs or areas of ground-water seepage observed on the site during field
reconnaissance. If a permanent water table does exist, it is probably more than 100 feet
below the ground surface (California Department of Water Resources [CDWR] 1967).
Perched ground-water conditions may develop at the interface between fill and underlying
bedrock due to precipitation and irrigation (lCG 1990).
-
-
-
-
The RWQCB identifies the existing beneficial use of ground water in the Dulzura subunit
as only for industrial service supply. Municipal and domestic supply and agricultural
supply are also listed as beneficial uses, but the RWQCB points out that the water quality
does not meet the criteria for municipal use, agricultural irrigation, or livestock watering.
The subunit shows a future potential beneficial use for groundwater recharge in the Otay
River Valley.
-
..
-
-
Impacts
Surface Drainal:e
-
A major hydrologic concern in this area is the runoff effects on sensitive areas such as the
Otay Reservoir, most importantly the potential impacts on the potable water supply of the
Otay Reservoir.
-
-
-
3-40
Jyl1-!fR7
010571000
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
With development of the project site, the area covered by the boathouse building and
adjacent concrete deck (total area = 40,820 sq. ft.) will be rendered impervious to water.
As a result, rainfall infiltration into soil in this area will be impeded and overland flow
would take place readily over the relatively smooth impermeable surfaces. Grading and
utility plans for the proposed boathouse facility include provisions for a drainage system
which will divert runoff to a "soakaway basin" where storm water will be filtered to
remove particulate matter and dissolved chemicals prior to discharge into Otay Reservoir.
The Soakaway Basin Conceptual Design Report is contained in Appendix G. Basic
"soakaway basin" design consists of a storm drain system which conveys runoff from the
roof and deck to a modified cleanout. Water then travels via a lateral pipe to the soakaway
basin. The soakaway basin is comprised of a 3-foot layer of a sandy loam soil overlying a
perforated pipe which conveys water to Otay Reservoir. A great majority of accumulated
contaminants are removed from impervious surfaces during the first 1/2 inch of runoff for a
given storm event, which for the OTC project site is equivalent to 0.1 acre-feet. Therefore,
the storage capacity of the soakaway basin will be a minimum of 0.1 acre-feet. Since storm
runoff in excess of this quantity is comparatively free of urban pollution, flow occurring
after the first 0.1 acre-feet will bypass the soakaway basin and discharge directly into Otay
Reservoir. Proper design and use of these measures will reduce impacts due to increased
runoff to a level below significance.
The access road and parking area for the proposed facility will be surfaced with
decomposed granite to allow for unimpeded infiltration of storm water. Proper design and
construction of these areas will reduce impacts due to increased runoff to below a level of
significance.
During initial construction periods, runoff may be accompanied by increased sediment
loads. The ultimate change from undeveloped to developed and landscaped conditions
would, however, greatly decrease sediment yields (Knott 1973, Guy 1975). Proper
implementation of erosion control measures during the construction phase of the project
will reduce impacts due to increased sediment loads to a level below significance.
Water Quality
Development of the site for the OTC Boathouse would result in a change in the type of
contaminants contained in surface runoff. Concentrations of contaminants such as oil,
grease, and heavy metals from automotive sources would be increased. Ultimate sediment
010571000
3-41
/YA-/~~
...
..
loads of runoff from the site would decrease from existing levels. Impervious surfaces,
stonn drains and planted lawns associated with development would afford greater soil
erosion protection than the bare or partially vegetated ground associated with the existing
land use. Concentrations of suspended solids could decrease to less than 5 percent of
existing levels (Ogden 1989).
-
-
The primary water quality issue of the proposed project involves the possible discharge of
urban runoff contaminants from the parking lot, drives and other surfaces into the Otay
Lakes Reservoir. Proper design and use of measures described in Surface Drainage will
reduce impacts due to urban runoff contaminants to a level below significance.
..
..
..
Ground Water
Development of the project sites would not affect local or regional groundwater conditions
in the project site vicinity. There are no wells extracting ground water from the site at the
present time and ground water has not been proposed as a source of water supply in
surrounding developments. If a pennanent water table does exist beneath the site, it is
likely more than 100 feet below the ground surface (CDWR 1%7) and would be unaffected
by this development. The project site is not an important recharge watershed area for any
local aquifers (CDWR 1967) and, therefore, site development would not affect regional
ground-water levels.
..
..
-
...
Mitigation Measures
-
Surface Drainal:e
..
The following measures are presented to mitigate potential drainage problems associated
with development of the site:
...
. Specific project plans will be subject to review and approval of the City of
Chula Vista in cooperation with the city of San Diego.
...
..
.
A preliminary grading and utility plan was included as part of the Soakaway
Basin Conceptual Design Report. Final design plan submittals shall be
consistent with the conceptual plans and approved by Cities of Chula Vista and
..
...
3.42
)ilf} ~/(P7
010571000
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
010571000
San Diego and the County Health Department prior to issuance of a final
grading permit.
.
Pad drainage shall be designed to collect and direct surface waters away from
proposed structures to approved drainage facilities. For lawn and parking
areas, a minimum gradient of two percent shall be maintained and drainage shall
be directed toward approved swales or drainage facilities. Drainage patterns
approved at the time of final grading should be maintained throughout the life of
proposed structures.
Runoff from roof and concrete deck surfaces shall be diverted to the soakaway
basin as described in Surface Drainage Impacts and the Soakaway Basin
Conceptual Design Report (Appendix G). Final improvement plans shall be
consistent with the conceptual document and approved by the Cities of Chula
Vista and San Diego and the County Health Department prior to issuance of a
grading permit. Issuance of the grading permit shall also be contingent upon
the establishment of a maintenance agreement between the City of San Diego
and the STF/USOC for the soakaway (including provisions for soil and piping
replacement, etc.), or waiver of such agreement by the City.
.
Erosional Control: Slopes shall be planted with appropriate drought-resistant
vegetation as recommended by a landscape architect immediately following
grading. Slopes should not be over-irrigated as heavy groundcover combined
with over-watering is a primary source of surficial slope failures. Timer-
controlled irrigation should be altered during the rainy season.
.
Maintenance of Drainage Devices: Graded berms. swales, area drains, and
slopes are designed to carry surface water from pad areas and shall not be
blocked or destroyed. Water will not be allowed to pond in pad areas, or over
top and flow down graded or natural slopes.
.
Erosion potential during the construction phase of the project shall be controlled
through the proper use of erosional control measures, the maintenance of
vegetative buffers and timely planning of inundation to avoid peak rainy
seasons.
3.43
/1/l -/70
..
..
. Development of the subject project and the EastLake III project, in general,
must comply with all applicable regulations established by the United States
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as set forth in the National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements for urban runoff
and storm water discharge.
..
...
Water Duality
..
Specific project plans for surface drainage into Otay Lakes shall be subject to review and
approval by the city of Chula Vista, the RWQCB and the County Health Department. At
that time, the project applicant may be required to divert all surface runoff from the site
away from the reservoir.
...
..
Sources of uncontrolled water, such as leaky water pipes or drains shall be immediately
repaired if identified.
...
..
Erosion control devices discussed previously would significantly reduce the sediment load
in the runoff waters. Devices constructed to drain and protect slopes, including brow
ditches, berms, retention basins, terrace drains (if utilized) and down drains shall be
maintained regularly, and in particular, shall not be allowed to clog so that water can flow
unchecked over slope faces.
..
...
Implementation of the soakaway basin as described in Surface Drainage will reduce impacts
due to urban runoff contamination to a level below significance.
..
..
Ground Water
..
No mitigation is required beyond that identified for surface drainage and water quality.
Analysis of Significance
..
Surface Draina~e
...
Development of the project site as proposed would not have a siguificant impact on surface
drainage with implementation of the above measures. Potentially significant project
impacts will be mitigated to below a level of significance by the above measures.
...
...
3-44
;c-!fJ-/7f
010571000
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Water Quality
Development of the project site as proposed would not have a significant impact on water
quality with implementation of the above measures. Potentially significant project impacts
will be mitigated to below a level of significance by the above measures.
Ground Water
Refer to surface drainage and water quality.
3.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES
The following archaeological/historical resources discussion is based on confidential
technical reports prepared by Ogden prepared as part of the SEIR for the SPA Plan for
Olympic Training Center Boathouse (Cultural Resource Survey of Three Proposed Sites
for the Olympic Training Center Boathouse, Chula Vista, California, March 1991 and
Cultural Resource Testing and Evaluation of CA-SDi-ll,601lCA-SDi-ll,602 for the
Olympic Training Center Boathouse, Chula Vista, California, November 1991). These
reports are summarized below and contained in full at the City of Chula Vista Planning
Department
Existing Conditions
Previous work in the vicinity of the proposed project site identified 36 sites/isolates within
a I-mile radius of the study area. One isolate find W -2727 Locus F was recorded within
the project area.
Ogden's archaeologists surveyed the project site area with the following results.
Sites CA-SDi-ll,601 and CA-SDi-ll,602, both lithic scatters, were identified and
recorded by Ogden's field archaeologists. Two isolates, one a single metavolcanic flake
and the other two unlabeled and deteriorated cone-top cans, were also recorded during the
survey. Testing was conducted at CA-SDi-ll,601 and CA-SDi-ll,602. Both sites were
determined to be a portion of a large, low-density lithic scatter with a minimal subsurface
component All surface cultural material was recovered during the testing program.
0/0571000
3.45
IYA,172
OIl
...
Impacts
...
No project-related impacts will occur to cultural resources. CA-SDi-ll,6Ol and CA-SDi-
11 ,602 were identified during testing as minimal lithic scatters with limited ability to
provide important information. CA-SDi-11,6Ol and CA-SDi-11,602 do not qualify as
important cultural resources under CEQA and therefore no impacts will occur.
...
...
The isolate finds are not important pursuant to CEQA, and impacts to those finds will not
occur.
...
Mitigation Measures
...
Because CA-SDi-11,60l and CA-SDi-ll,602 do not qualify as important cultural
resources under CEQA, no impacts will occur and mitigation measures are not necessary.
...
Analysis of Significance
...
Important cultural resources are not present within the project area. No impacts will occur
and mitigation measures are not necessary.
...
3.6 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
...
The biological resources of the project site on the shores of Lower Otay Reservoir
(Figure 2-2) are discussed in this section. The site was surveyed by Ogden biologists in
September 1990 and again in June 1991. As such, some potentially occurring sensitive
plant species may not have been detected. Potentially occurring sensitive species are
provided as Attachment A in Appendix H to this document.
...
...
...
Existing Conditions
...
The vegetation community types on this site include Diegan coastal sage scrub, riparian
scrub, freshwater marsh and rooted vascular aquatic bed. The central portion of the site is
characterized by coastal sage scrub that has been disturbed by an unknown cause. The
dominant species in the disturbed coastal sage scrub include California buckwheat
(Eriogonum fasciculatum) and broom baccharis (Baccharis sarothroides), which are
sparsely distributed throughout the disturbed area. Undisturbed coastal sage scrub habitat
...
...
...
3-46
lil7 ~ /7 )
010571000
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
surrounding the disturbed area of the site is dominated by California buckwheat and
California sagebrush (Artemisia ca/ifornica) with broom baccharis found in swales at the
north and south ends of the site (Figure 3-7). Small patches of coastal prickly pear
(Opuntia littoralis) and coast cholla (Opuntia pro/if era) are also interspersed throughout this
habitat.
Bordering the shore of Lower Otay Reservoir is an approximately 80-foot-wide band of
freshwater marsh dominated by bulrush (Scirpus ca/ifornicus). The width of the
freshwater marsh fringe can expand somewhat during summer months. Associated with
this marsh is a thin fringe of riparian scrub dominated by black willow (Sa/ix gooddingii
var. variabilis) located immediately upland of the bulrushes (Figure 3-7) Outside of the
freshwater marsh habitat is a zone of rooted vascular aquatic bed habitat. This habitat is
dominated by thick seasonal growth of water-milfoil (Myriophy/um exa/bescens) and
pondweed (Potamogeton pectinatus). This habitat is typically found in water less than
30 feet deep and dies back above ground completely in the winter. These aquatic species
can become dense enough to be considered a nuisance by reservoir managers and
fishermen.
Two sensitive plant species were detected on this site: mesa clubmoss (Se/aginella
cinerascens) and San Diego sunflower (Viguiera /aciniata). Mesa clubmoss is dispersed
throughout openings in the undisturbed coastal sage scrub habitat onsile, and
approximately 45 San Diego sunflower individuals were observed at the southeastern
portion of the site (Figure 3-7).
The quality of the wildlife habitat at this site varies. The disturbed coastal sage scrub in the
central portion of the site appears to have been graded in the past and is considered to be of
low quality due to low structural and species diversity. The coastal sage scrub habitats at
the south, west, and north portions of the site are of higher quality. These sage scrub
habitats support populations of mesa club moss and San Diego sunflower and may support
populations of orange-throated whiptails (Cnemidophorus hyperythrus be/dingi) and San
Diego homed lizard (Phrynosoma coronatum b/ainvillei); however, these reptiles were not
observed onsite. Other detected and potentially occurring sensitive species are listed in
Attachment A in Appendix H.
Five breeding territories of California gnatcatchers were mapped in the project vicinity
(Figure 3-8 and Attachment B in Appendix H). The California gnatcatcher is currently
010571000
3-47
)'1/1 ~ 17'1
FRESHWATER MARSH
WillOW SCRUB
DIEGAN COASTAL SAGE SCRUB
DISTURBED COASTAL SAGE SCRUB
EUCAL VPTUS
Baccharis/N icotiana
Viguiera laciniata
~-
'.::,
-~
X55Sb X56/0
~
~ ::
----- ..~. . ~ /
~
)
X548.0
o
,
FEET
LEGEND
OGDEN
.....
Vegetation Convnunltles and Sensitive Plant ;} /J ~ / 1/ /'
Species location )7 i7 /P
3-48
...
I
~I
J
~I
~I
;1
t-
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
280
,
...
...
....
....
FIGURE
...
3-7
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FEET
LEGEND
CALIFORNIA GNATCATCHER
TERRITORY BOUNDARY
~ NOTPARTOFCALJFORNIA
~ GNATCATCHER TERRITORY
NOTE: SCALE IS APPROXIMATE
OGDEN
.....
Ie/A "/7/:7
1.49
FIGURE
3-8
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
under consideration for federal and state endangered species status and is treated as
endangered by the City of San Diego Resource Protection Ordinance (RPO) Administrative
Guidelines (City of San Diego 1991). The breeding territories are in the coastal sage scrub
adjacent to the proposed boathouse site. The project site may be used for foraging in
non-breeding season, but the quality of the habitat and sparse vegetation cover limits its
usefulness as breeding habitat. Habitats to the west of this site have been completely
destroyed by agriculture, and habitats to the north of this site have been disturbed by
grading or fIre and are unlikely to support breeding California gnatcatchers. Eucalyptus
trees onsite are likely to be used by raptors and other birds as roosts.
Lower Otay Reservoir supports warm-water fish species such as largemouth bass
(Micropterus salmoides) and bluegill sunfIsh (Lepomis machrochirus). The reservoir
supports a very productive fIshery and is considered to be one of the premier largemouth
bass fIsheries in the United States. Largemouth bass tend to be associated with shoreline
areas for most of the year. However, adult bass are known to move into open water areas
to prey on schools of small fIsh such as threadfIn shad (Dorosoma petenense). Movement
into deeper water occurs primarily during summer and winter.
The lake itself is also an important resource to other wildlife species; however, there is very
little information available on the use and nesting status of birds at Otay Reservoir. No
Christmas bird counts are conducted at the reservoir, and the only data available are
individual sighting reports (pers. comm. P. Unitt) and hunting takes (City of San Diego
Water Utilities Department). Larry Bottroff (pers. comm.) from the City of San Diego
reports that the lake is used mainly for resting and foraging, and that little nesting occurs
onsite. A list of common species that use the lake is provided in Attachment C in
Appendix H. Also included in Attachment C of Appendix H is the total number of
waterfowl taken by hunters at Lower Otay reservoir in 1990. In addition, the reservoir is
likely to be an important source of water for mammalian species in open space areas to the
north, south, and east of the reservoir.
Impacts
Construction of the training facilities at this site would result in impacts to approximately
3.0 acres of Diegan coastal sage scrub and 0.1 acre of wetland that is primarily freshwater
marsh. Approximately 0.6 acre of the sage scrub impacts occur in high quality,
undisturbed Diegan coastal sage scrub, and the remaining acreage impact occurs in low
010571000
3-51
;c//l-/7?
...
..,
quality, disturbed coastal sage scrub. The impacts to Diegan coastal sage scrub are
considered significant because of the regional sensitivity of this habitat and because it
supports sensitive plant and animal species. The impacts to wetland habitats (freshwater
marsh and riparian scrub) are considered significant because of their high biological value
and protected status at the federal, state, and local levels. Impacts to wetland habitats will
require a California Department of Fish and Game Streambed Alteration Agreement. The
project has been issued a Nationwide 404 permit from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
...
...
...
The boathouse and associated grading and planting do not impact the five existing breeding
California gnatcatcher territories. Gnatcatchers may use portions of the disturbed coastal
sage scrub in the project area for non-breeding season foraging. The relatively high density
of gnatcatchers in the area and the fact that no gnatcatchers are currently utilizing this area
for breeding purposes indicates that the habitat is of marginal quality. Therefore, direct
impacts to California gnatcatchers are not considered significant. Potential impacts to other
sensitive species detected onsite are not considered significant
...
...
...
...
The project also calls for a floating modular dock to be placed in the lake adjacent to the
boathouse facility (see Figure 2-2). The dock would be accessed via the sand path that
would be cut through the freshwater marsh vegetation at the lake's edge. The dock is to be
placed outside of the freshwater marsh habitat and the distance of the dock from shore will
be adjusted to avoid the seasonally expanding vegetation fringe. The reservoir manager
will be responsible for notifying the boathouse coordinator of the need to move the floating
dock further from shore to avoid impacts to emergent vegetation. Other than maintenance
of the sand path, no vegetation will be disturbed by the construction or use of the dock.
...
-
...
-
AU agencies contacted (see Attachment C in Appendix H) agreed that some general
disturbance to foraging and open water roosting of waterfowl would occur from
continuous use of the open water areas of the reservoir for training. However, an
estimated maximum of 30 Olympic training boats would be on the lake at anyone time,
with the number of boats on the lake greatest in the afternoon (see Exhibit H). In addition,
no athletes would be allowed to use the Harvey Arm of the reservoir from mid-October to
mid-January and athletes would have to remain 150 feet from shore on Wednesdays,
Saturdays, and Sundays from mid-January to mid-October except in areas shown in
Figure 3-2. The continuous use of the open water areas of the lake is expected to produce
some disturbance to roosting waterfowl, although only when boats are in relatively close
proximity to individual waterfowl. Given the nature of the impact (i.e., less than
..
...
...
...
...
3-52
) L/ IJ / / 7<f'
010571000
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
approximately 30 non-motorized boats at anyone time) and the use restrictions placed on
training activities, the potential impacts to waterfowl are not considered significant. It is
further recommended that the training boats be kept a minimum of 20 feet away from the
emergent vegetation at all times.
From a biological perspective, construction of the training facilities is not expected to result
in adverse impacts to the fishery at Lower Otay Reservoir. The majority of training
activities would take place in deeper water areas of the lake and these areas are utilized less
by largemouth bass than are shallow areas around the lake margin. Further, given the use
restrictions discussed above and the recommended permanent 20-foot restriction zone
around the lake margin, potential impacts to fish in shallow water areas would be
minimized.
The area under the floating dock is likely to be used by juvenile fishes as a refuge from
adult piscivorous fish or, conversely, the cover afforded by the dock may attract adult bass
(although there is probably only enough area for one adult territory under the dock). From
a biological perspective, the floating dock is not expected to produce any adverse impacts to
the fishery of Lower Otay Reservoir.
As specified in Appendix B of the final Joint EIR/EIS for the Secondary Treatment facilities
of the Clean Water Program (Pg. 78), "The City of San Diego will expeditiously commit to
preserve specific City-owned lands identified in the MSCP (Multiple Species Conservation
Program) as having existing or potential habitat values which will provide the 'cornerstone'
land areas. These lands shall be preserved for their wildlife habitat values. Activities
which adversely affect wildlife habitat shall not be allowed." City of San Diego-owned
lands surrounding Lower Otay Reservoir are mentioned as potential cornerstone lands.
The Olympic Training Center boathouse project could have potentially adverse effects to the
mitigation measures for the secondary treatment facilities of the Clean Water Program as
implemented via the MSCP. First, the Olympic Training Center boathouse project could
potentially diminish the value of the City of San Diego-owned lands surrounding Lower
Otay Reservoir to wildlife and thereby diminish their utility as cornerstones for natural open
space preserves. Because the presence of the Olympic Training Center boathouse is not
considered to result in significant, adverse impacts to wildlife species or their habitat, this
effect is not considered significant
010571000
3.53
/YIJ//71
..
...
Second, the Olympic Training Center boathouse project may be inconsistent with land use
designations that may potentially be identified for City of San Diego-owned lands
surrounding Lower Otay Reservoir if they are identified as cornerstone land areas by the
MSCP. Because operations of the Olympic Training Center boathouse are not inconsistent
with existing land uses at the reservoir (e.g., hunting, motorized fishing boats, hiking),
this is not considered to be a significant adverse impact.
-
.
...
...
Indirect impacts as a result of the construction of the facility at this site could include
erosion and sliding of materials into wetland habitats. Any movement of material into
wetland habitats would be considered a significant adverse impact. Indirect impacts to
California gnatcatchers as a result of increased human access and activity on this site is
considered potentially significant. These potentially significant impacts can be mitigated to
below a level of significance by reducing human access to the coastal sage scrub areas on
the project site with signs and barrier plantings; and, restricting access to the coastal sage
scrub mitigation areas on the Olympic Training Center site.
...
...
...
...
Cumulative Biolovical Considerations
....
Cumulative impacts include the loss of habitat and potentially occurring sensitive species
populations on a regional basis due to increased human activity on the reservoir. The
cumulative loss of Diegan coastal sage scrub and potentially occurring sensitive species is
considered a significant adverse impact. Potential significant impacts due to increased
human activity will be mitigated by implementing remedial measures (e.g., restricting
shoreline access year round).
-
'"
....
Mitigation Measures
Approximately 0.6 acre of high quality Diegan coastal sage scrub will be impacted by
grading for the road and approximately 2.4 acres of disturbed Diegan coastal sage scrub
will be impacted by construction of the boathouse. A 2: 1 mitigation ratio will be used for
the high quality sage scrub (1.2 acre), and a 1:1 ratio will be used for the disturbed sage
scrub (2.4 acres). A total of 3.6 acres of Diegan coastal sage scrub will be planted on the
two southern most slopes on the west side of the Olympic Training Center adjacent to the
Salt Creek dedicated open space. The proposed mitigation area is shown in Figure 2-3.
Sensitive plant species should be used in the coastal sage scrub restoration if available. In
...,
,
....~
...
...
...
3-54
JLjI! / /0/0
010571000
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
addition, all areas disturbed by grading around the Olympic Training Center boathouse
(including the access road) will be revegetated with coastal sage scrub.
Since no areas exist around the lake margin to restore freshwater marsh habitat, impacts to
freshwater marsh (0.1 acre) habitat shall be mitigated out-of-kind by planting native
riparian tree species along the lake margin, outside of the freshwater marsh fringe. It is
proposed that 20 Fremont cottonwoods (Populus fremontii) be planted at intervals around
the margin of the lake. In addition, except for the sand path, no maintenance of vegetation
around the margin of the lake will be allowed. The boathouse manager will be responsible
for including a discussion of the timing and distance the floating dock was moved each year
(to avoid wetland impacts) in the Quarterly Management Report
The proposed mitigation areas shall be approved by City of San Diego and City of Chula
Vista staff in consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the California
Department of Fish and Game. A Draft Mitigation Plan for the proposed project is
provided in Appendix I.
Analysis of Significance
Implementation of the mitigation measures listed above would reduce the impacts to a level
below significance. The potential indirect impacts due to possible erosion or material
sliding into wetlands can be avoided by careful construction practices. Potential indirect
impacts to gnatcatchers will also be reduced to a level below significance by reducing
human access to the coastal sage scrub with sign or barrier plantings on the project site;
and, restricting access on the coastal sage scrub mitigation areas on the Olympic Training
Center site across Wueste Road.
The cumulative impacts to resident sensitive species and loss of coastal sage scrub will also
be reduced to a level below significance with the implementation of mitigation to coastal
sage scrub habitat
3.7 TRAFFIC AND CIRCULATION
The following traffic analysis was based on the traffic report prepared by JHK &
Associates (1989) for the Olympic Training Center project and the Facilities Management
Plan (Appendix C). Existing roadway classifications, volumes, and level of service
010571000
3.55
JLjIJ - Iff!
"""
..
standards are discussed in funher detail in the Final EIR (89-11) for the Olympic Training
Center (SPA) plan, available for review at the City of Chula Vista Planning Department
...
Existing Conditions
..
The OTC Boathouse site is located in the eastern territories area of Chula Vista,
immediately west of Lower Otay Reservoir (refer to Figure 2.2). Regional access to the
site is provided by Interstate 805 at the interchange with Telegraph Canyon Road.
Telegraph Canyon Road varies from a six-lane divided road between Interstate 805 and
west of Otay Lakes Road, at which point it becomes two lanes. Telegraph Canyon Road is
planned as a six-lane prime arterial from Interstate 805 to Hunte Parkway. Additionally,
the easterly segment of Otay Lakes Road is to be renamed Telegraph Canyon Road. Local
access is provided by Telegraph Canyon Road and Wueste Road, northwest of the site.
Figure 3-9 shows the existing circulation network.
""
..
....
..
State Route 125 (SR 125), not yet constructed would provide additional regional access to
the project site. SR 125 would provide a major north-south link from the U.S.-Mexico
International Border to the eastern portion of the Metropolitan San Diego Area.
...
...
City of Chula Vista Threshold standards for traffic state that, citywide, Level of Service C
(conditions of stable flow; speeds and maneuverability are restricted) or better must be
maintained at all intersections, with the exception that LOS D (conditions approaching
unstable flow) may occur at signalized intersections for a period not to exceed a total of two
hours per day. Roadway segments in the project area currently function at Level of Service
(LOS) B or A (1989).
..
...
'1IIlI
Impacts
-
Proiect-~ecific Tmffic Generation
...
The approved Olympic Training Center project in conjunction with the proposed Boathouse
project would generate a total of 4,937 daily trips at buildout in 1995. Vehicles generated
specifically by the Boathouse project include athletes and coaches commuting to the facility
on a daily basis for rowing/canoe kayaking workouts. Assuming all 38 boathouse parking
spaces are used for each of the two primary workouts (morning and evenings) the total
number of vehicles generated by the project would be 152 vehicles. This represents a
...
....
"'!
3-56
Jc;/l ~ 1:fJ--
010571000
....
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
"8
tl
:
..I
.. ..
l5 Q Q
_ .. U
.!.....u~J!
,.. .. II II .! - -
" u - 0
~t:::..o8u
:I<"';;~==
., u :s .. ~
~.5,,,'~iiSS8
1Ucl:::E::EUUU::
~~~~~~~i
.. '\Ij' \G ... .. N N ...I
I I I I I I I I
~es::E::EU=='ti
IU .......UU..l
.. N N
c
Q
.;:
U
::
..
..
..
C
Q
U
..
-8
c
::l
*
~
""
..
-
.-
;0 ~
0...
o
.
;;;
~
1~
N
~
Reo Dr
J
,..
.-
<II
o
'"
~
is
;
en
/ f)'/'i'
3-57
r..l
c::
;:l
"
0)
I
~
-
\<.0
i!:
~
~
c
o
i
'5
e
o
~
01(
CO
c
i
;H
'"
'"
'"
.;
l!!
..
'y
g
~
..
..
'"
:I:
~
:z:: ·
..... .
c:a.
c.:::I .
Ct.
w
u
a:
::J
o
(J)
...
-
project contribution of less than one percent of total daily trips generated by the Olympic
Training Center and Boathouse project at buildout in 1995. This previous analysis
prepared by IRK Associates concluded that trips generated by the OTC, including the
boathouse would not constitute a significant impact on the local roadway system on a
project-specific basis.
"'"
-
As discussed in the Final EIR for the OTC project the majority of vehicle trips would be
distributed on Telegraph Canyon Road to I-80S in the early development stages. Traffic on
Telegraph Canyon Road would be later reduced when the extension of Orange Avenue
from I-80S to Hunte Parkway is completed, and further when the proposed SR-125
Freeway is constructed from SR-54 to Telegraph Canyon Road and to Orange Avenue.
...
-
'-
Events
...
IRK Associates' analysis did not address special event traffic. As discussed in Section 2
(Project Description), events involving more than 100 people other than OTC athletes and
their coaches are not proposed as part of this project. Events would require a special use
permit, which must be approved by the Cities of San Diego and Chula Vista. The Cities
would indicate, in approving any special event request, conditions under which the event
may be held, including parking and shuttle arrangements. A parking plan will be required
for each event and will consist of (at a minimum) the following components: onsite
permitted parking locations, offsite parking locations, shuttle arrangements, and traffic
control. The parking plan would be required to be submitted as part of the permit
information request. In addition, any permit event to be sponsored by the USOC,
USRowing and/or USCKT will require a Zoning Administrator's Conditional Use Permit,
including environmental review and determination by the City.
....
...
-
-
""
...
Small events such as "speed order" or team selection "trials" may be desired by the OTC
and are permitted under the CUP. For these small events, it is expected that up to
100 people can be accommodated at the boathouse site. Shuttling of these people from the
main campus parking area to the boathouse would be required once the onsite parking
(38 spaces) is full.
...
-
...
-
3-58
) y/J -/'61
010571000
....
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Cumulative Traffic Assessment
The Olympic Training Center and Boathouse project would have a minimal contribution to
cumulative traffic volumes as determined by the JHK traffic report. If planned
development occurs in the eastern territories area and required transportation improvements
are constructed, adequate network capacity would be available for the total vehicle trips
expected from the approved OTC project (including proposed Boathouse) at buildout.
An analysis of cumulative traffic at buildout of the eastern territories (cumulative long-term
traffic) including traffic from the proposed project was prepared in the EastLake III EIR
(89-9). Significant impacts were identified for both 1991 and 1995 long-term cumulative
traffic (without mitigation) for the eastern territories area. Buildout of the proposed
Boathouse would occur after 1991 and therefore would not contribute to 1991 cumulative
traffic in the project area. Although ultimate buildout of the OTC project (including
Boathouse project) would have a minimal contribution to long term cumulative traffic
volumes, measures were incorporated in the OTC project to mitigate cumulative traffic
impacts to acceptable levels.
Mitigation Measures
Development of the Boathouse project would not result in significant daily traffic impacts.
However, during small events, shuttling of people from the OTC main campus area will be
required once the OTC Boathouse parking (38 spaces) is full.
No special events/competitions which attract more than 100 spectators shall be allowed at
the OTC Boathouse or lake under this approval. Any future request for competitions shall
be subject to CEQA review and review by the Cities of Chula Vista and San Diego.
Measures to mitigate significant cumulative related impacts from development of the eastern
territories are included in the Final EIR for the OTC Plan and the EastLake III (GDP) Final
EIR.
Analysis of Significance
No significant project-related traffic impacts will occur with day-to-day use of the proposed
OTC Boathouse.
010571000
3.59
/
/ L/ /l - ) 8'.!J
..
...
Implementation of the above mitigation measure will reduce any potential parking impacts
associated with small events (less than 100 people) to below a level of significance.
...
-
...
...
"'"
...
...
...
....
"":
...
tIIlI\
...
-
...
....
3.60
fl!/)v/g/P
010571000
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SECTION 4
AL TERNA TIVES
4.1 INTRODUCTION
The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that an EIR include a
discussion of reasonable project alternatives, including the No Project alternative. The
purpose of the Alternatives Section is to focus on alternatives "capable of eliminating any
significant adverse environmental effects or reducing them to a level of insignificance"
(CEQA Section l5l26(d) (3)).
The alternatives analysis in this SEIR is especially critical due to potential impacts of the
proposed boathouse on biological resources, aesthetics and the nearby recreational uses
associated with the City of San Diego boat launch facility (refer to Section 3 for impact
analyses). A number of alternatives to reduce or minimize the impacts were explored
during preparation of this Draft EIR. The alternatives previously reviewed and those under
consideration are described and analyzed for environmental impact in this section pursuant
to CEQA requirements.
Previous Relevant CEQA Alternatives Analyses
Numerous previous environmental documents for the project area reviewed land use
alternatives for the site and general area. The following documents and their alternatives
analyses are incorporated herein by reference:
. 1982 Master Final EIR for the EastLake Planned Community
. 1989 Final EIR for the Chula Vista General Plan Update
. Final EIR 89-9, East Lake III/OTC General Development Plan
. Final EIR 89-11, Olympic Training Center SPA Plan
. 1990 LAFCO Negative Declaration (ND) for the East Lake III/Olympic Training
Center Reorganization (annexation of 1,518 acres)
010571000
4-1
I~/J ~ j;?' 7
-
...
Final SEIR 89-11 for the OTC SPA Plan (listed above) provides a summary of the past
CEQA alternatives analyses for the OTC area (including East Lake IIIIEIR 89-9), and
further describes in detail the extensive site selection process for the OTC project.
Sections 2 and 6 of Final SEIR 89-11 are particularly noted and cited herein as important
in consideration of the overall OTC project alternatives.
...
-
As discussed in EIR 89-11, the OTC site selection developed over a period of time and
included extensive evaluation of alternative sites. Over 30 sites in the greater San Diego
region were examined by the San Diego National Sports Training Foundation, the
non-profit organization that presented the proposal to the USOC for development of the
Center in this region. All sites were measured against the needs expressed by the USOC
for land size, access, transportation, proximity to schools, colleges, jobs and cultural
amenities. After review of all potential alternatives, the Olympic site at EastLake was
selected by the Foundation and approved by the USOC. Consequently, further evaluation
of an alternative site is not warranted in this section.
-
...
...
...
..
Alternatives Considered and Dismissed from Further Consideration
..
During EIR preparation and project evaluation, two additional alternatives were identified in
an attempt to reduce environmental impacts, specifically the recreational compatibility
conflicts and the potential biological and aesthetic impacts of the project These alternatives
were subsequently dismissed and not evaluated in detail herein, because they were both
identified as infeasible by the applicant, who indicated the project would not be built under
either of these circumstances. These two alternatives are briefly described below.
..
..
...
Four-dav Olymnic Traininl! Alternative. This alternative consists of OTC training activities
on the Lower Olay Reservoir four days per week: Monday, Tuesday, Thursday and
Friday. On the other three days per week, lake use would be limited to the existing "open"
public use, as currently operated by the City of San Diego (for fishing, waterfowl hunting
and other recreational boating). The OTC athletes would be required to train elsewhere on
Wednesday, Saturday and Sunday. This alternative was created to mitigate the recreational
compatibility impacts identified in Section 3.1 herein.
-
-
-
After research and discussion of the feasibility of this alternative with the Foundation and
Olympic Training coaches (3/92 pers. comm., Patrick McNerney, US Rowing), this 4-day
program alternative was determined to render the project undesirable or infeasible to the
-
-
4-2
/t/ I) / / 'if?:
010571000
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
applicant. The reason behind this rejection relates to the rigorous and constrained training
program required of the athletes. Boats and equipment would have to be moved (by
truck/trailer) back and forth from the OTC site to another destination (potentially South San
Diego Bay, or other site in San Diego); at least two round trips per week would be
required. In addition, athletes who would be working part- or full-time, and arriving at the
OTC site to train each day, would not have the time to change sites. The OTC indicated
that the site at Lower Otay Lake would not be built under these circumstances, and thus this
scenario would result in the No Project Alternative.
MinimallReduced Facility on Lake Fronl3.~e: Other Boathouse Components at the Main
OTC Site. This reduced size alternative would provide a smaller boathouse on the lake
frontage, and move certain project components to the main OTC site across Wueste Road.
For example, the shower/locker areas, the coaches' offices, equipment room and repair
shop would be deleted from the proposed structure, resulting in a building site of about
6,000 to 8,000 square feet. The alternative could reduce the physical area impacted by the
building, thus potentially reducing biological impacts slightly, and would reduce visual
impacts.
Upon discussion, this alternative was considered by the applicant to render the project
infeasible for reasons similar to the above discussed Four-day Alternative. The athletes are
usually on a tight time frame and often train at least twice a day. For working athletes, this
means they would typically train in the early morning and after work, and could not afford
the additional transition time (Le., at least an extra hour per workout to go back and forth
from the lake to OTC, for coach consultation with video, weight training and showering,
etc.). Also, for all athletes in training, a typical workout may involve warm-up, water
training, then coach consultation (often including videos), possibly weight training and
often another water workout session. The distance between the lake and main OTC site
would render this scenario of training inefficient. The applicant has indicated that this
alternative would also render the project infeasible and result in the No Project Alternative.
Through this evaluation, various options in building design and size were explored at
various meetings (refer to Appendix D) to determine how much the facility could feasibly
be reduced. The facility could be reduced to a small extent (Le., height reduction) to
minimize aesthetic impacts; this reduction is recommended as mitigation in Section 3.2,
Visual and Aesthetics. Other feasible reductions may include less shower/locker area,
and/or less storage space, which would result in minimal reduction from the proposed size.
01057/000
4-3
JLI/) -; ~7
...
...
Proiect Site and Desie-n Alternatives Reviewed by the Apolicant Durin!! the Screencheck
EIR Process
-
'"
During the preliminary project CEQA review, significant impacts were discovered in
association with the originally proposed project site (now identified herein as EIR
Alternative 3, Original Site; or site plan 1 in Figure 4-1). In addition to meetings with staff
from the cities of Chula Vista and San Diego and other agencies, the applicant's
representatives held numerous meetings with the San Diego City Lakes Comminee and
fishing and hunting representatives, to fully understand the project's potential impacts and
ideally resolve them. Appendix D provides a chronology of the citizen meetings. It was
determined by the project applicant that exploration of different site locations (on the west
side of the lake) was needed, and further design considerations were warranted. Seven
separate sites were identified by the applicant in the summer of 1991, and each was
evaluated at a general level for project feasibility and environmental impact. Figure 4-1
illustrates these alternative locations: sites 1, 2, 3 and 4 are in the general project site area
(site plan 4 is the currently proposed project site); sites 5, 6 and 7 are in proximity to the
City of San Diego existing boat launch facility.
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Sites 2 and 3 in Figure 4-1 were determined to be infeasible and were eliminated due to
potentially significant biological habitat impacts. Sites 5 and 7 were also determined to be
infeasible and eliminated due to inadequate site size needed to accommodate the boathouse.
Sites 5, 6 and 7 (City of San Diego boat launch area) are not acceptable to the applicant
generally for two reasons: each would require either a two-story structure or raised
building pad to provide for sewage flows (a two-story structure would also result in greater
visual impacts); and conflicts between the OTC activities and the City of San Diego
operations would be greater (i.e., parking limitations, traffic/access, operations conflicts).
In addition, use of Sites 5 or 6 would displace a significant number of public-use parking
spaces for the City boat launch facility.
..
...
...
-
Site 1 (in Figure 4-1) is the "Originally Proposed Site" and is reviewed later in this section
as Alternative 3; it is determined to be infeasible and is not recommended due to its
significant impacts. Site 6 (in Figure 4-1) is reviewed in more detail later in this section as
"Alternative Location 2"; it is not recommended for various reasons as described herein
(i.e., it would infringe upon the City of San Diego's critical boat launch parking area). Site
4 in the applicant's evaluation is the Proposed Project evaluated in this SEIR.
....
...
....
...
4-4
)t-j 4/) 90
010571000
...
"
..;
o
o
_"u
Q;~e
WO~
.S .12 c:
~ !.~
._0
~"'3
g .~ !!
<.> 1ii'~
.!!! g ~
C:-'Q;
'" ~.~ <
~ l! ~ffi
~ 11~-g
~<(.
~~; ~@]
"
w
"'
lr~ilf
O-~
a:"'e
Il.. f-.Q
>-,>t,
~w.
...JaC/)
"'a: a:
~Il..m
" -
a:
o
o
w
"'
Ow
g;!:::
a:"'
0->-
>-ill
gi3
wa:
a:0-
a:
::>
"
oL
~
fl
~
II
~
~
-.
~
-~~
,~
U
h
~j;
~!
------
''!'-
------
\
~
---
~
.;
~
i
e
'"
~
'g
.
.
=
U>
'"
~
a
~
~
'~
<(
.
!
tZ.
~ ......
~ c:a-
~
~ C.:::h
c:I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Alternatives Evaluated in this SEIR Pursuant to CEOA
The alternatives listed below, in combination with previously explored alternatives
(discussed above), have been reviewed to identify potential project alternatives which could
reduce to a level below significance the impacts identified in this SEIR. As discussed
above, a detailed alternatives evaluation was conducted prior to the final site selection and
Draft SEIR circulation; thus some of the alternatives presented below would result in
impacts greater than the proposed project. The project's CEQA process and its
comprehensive alternatives evaluation uphold the integrity of the CEQA alternatives
purpose.
. The No Project/No Development Alternative
. Alternative Location 1: City of San Diego Boat Launch/North Point Relocation
Alternative Location 2: OTC Boathouse and Expanded City of San Diego Boat
Launch at City's Existing Site (Applicant's site 6 on Figure 4-1)
. Originally Proposed Site (Applicant's site 1 on Figure 4-1)
4.2 No PROJECT/NO DEVELOPMENT
Selection of the No Project Alternative would result in the retention of the site as open
space/passive recreation and no development would occur. Although the site is not
currently developed, recreational activities on the site (and in the lake shore vicinity)
associated with fishing, rowing, canoeing and kayaking and passive recreation (i.e.,
picnicking, walking) are allowed under the City of San Diego Olay Lake operations. These
activities could presumably continue under the No Project alternative. The City of San
Diego adopted the Lakes Masterplan describes Lower Otay as an "urbanizing lake," one
that is expected to transition from less intensive "rural" uses to heavier recreational use as
the area around the lake urbanizes. The plan suggests that "opponunities should be
expanded (for non-motorized boating activities) through the development of an
aquatic-oriented recreation center offering rental equipment and instruction related to
sailing, rowing, canoeing/kayaking, water safety and fishing." Therefore the site can be
described as panially disturbed (refer to Section 3.6, Biological Resources and within an
010571000
4.7
/Ljfl/f9,+
...
..
area considered to be urbanizing). Open space/recreationalland uses would continue under
the No Project Alternative.
-
Under the No Project scenario, the following identified project impacts to the site and
adjacent environs would be eliminated or reduced: recreational land use incompatibility
(with nearby boating/fishing activities); visual/aesthetic effects; disturbance/destruction to
biological resources (0.4 acre of sage scrub and 0.1 acre of wetland); disturbance of
cultural resources; and potential effects of sedimentation/erosion on the adjacent water
resources. The No Project Alternative is, however, not consistent with the Chula Vista
General Plan, EastLake III General Development Plan or Olympic Training Center
Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan (Olympic Training Center uses are designated and
SPA Plan is approved for the area).
...
""!
..
..
Further, the No Project Alternative would not meet the project objectives (see Project
Description for detail) of providing a water sports training center within the approved
Olympic Training Center. The proximity of the Otay Lake water element to the OTC site
was a critical factor in the OTC site selection process, as described in SEIR 89-11,
Section 2. Without the lake element, the OTC could have been built on a number of sites
in the region. The OTC would not be complete without the water sports training
opportunities provided by the boathouse.
..
...
-
...
4.3 ALTERNATIVE LOCATION 1: OTC BOATHOUSE AT CITY OF SAN DIEGO
BOAT LAUNCH SITE; CITY FACILITIES AT NORTH POINT
..
Purpose/Background/Objective
..
Alternative Location 1 was created in response to an identified potential impact regarding
the project's conflict with existing boating/fishing activities now operated from the nearby
City of San Diego Boat Launching facility. During the Boathouse project's initial scoping
stages, public concern arose in regard to this potential impact, thus the issue is addressed in
this SEIR. Section 3.1 herein describes the existing activities and impact. This impact is
considered by some involved lake users to be significant and unmitigable.
-
..
..
Alternative Location 1 was formulated to avoid the perceived incompatibility impact, while
also meeting the project objectives of providing the OTC Boathouse and water sports
training base in proximity to the OTC, and implementing a project which is consistent with
-
..
4.8
)LjI///7)
010571000
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
the City of Chula Vista General Plan and adopted OTC SPA Plan. This alternative could
also provide for a larger and effective City of San Diego boat launch facility at North Point.
The alternative is described below and its potential consequences are reviewed on the
following pages.
Description of Alternative Location 1
The alternative involves two sites: the existing City of San Diego boat launch site and a site
across the lake known as "North Point." The originally proposed OTC Boathouse site
would not be involved in this alternative and would be retained as open space/passive
recreation.
Alternative Location I proposes the relocation of the existing (and planned expansion of)
the City of San Diego boat launching facility from its current site to another City-owned
recreational site across the lake ("North Point") located to the northeast (Figures 2-2 and
4-3 show its location). The OTC Boathouse facility would then be developed on the City
of San Diego's existing boat launching facility site (see Figures 4-2 and 4-3 for location
and existing photo). The North Point site would situate boat launching near known angling
areas of the lake (northeastern portions of the lake), across the lake from the OTC boat
launch and rowing/paddling training and time trial courses. The North Point site may be an
acceptable location for the City of San Diego planned boat launch facility expansion project.
The two sites and conceptual plans are described below.
North Point Site: Conc~tua1 City of San Die~o Boat Launch Facility
The North Point site is accessed by an existing paved road from Telegraph Canyon Road
east of its intersection with Wueste Road. Development (infrastructure) implementation
would be facilitated, and costs would be minimized by the existing paved road to the North
Point site.
Actions ReQjlired for Imnlementation of North Point Site. The Alternative Location 1 City
boat launch facility at North Point would require a Use Permit from the County of San
Diego, as the site is under the jurisdiction of the County. The site is owned by the City of
San Diego. The operation would be developed and operated under the City of San Diego
Water Utilities Department (as is the existing facility). The project would be considered
010571000
4-9
/L//J-/9tj
...
....
and approved through the County of San Diego planning and environmental review
processes when specific, detailed design plans are formulated.
-
City of San Diee-o Boat Launch Site: GTC Boathouse Implementation
...
This Alternative Location I is identified in the previous discussion as site 6 of the
applicant's alternatives evaluation (Figure 4-1). As illustrated in Figure 4-2, Photo 1, the
City of San Diego existing boat launch site is currently developed with docks, boat launch
and support uses (Figure 4-3 provides a photo key map). The current operation is accessed
from Wueste Road and fronts on the southwestern edge of the lake. Portions of the access
road and drive are paved; improvements are needed and planned for by the City Water
Utilities Department which is responsible for the facility and lake operations (grading and
construction is currently underway).
...
...
-
-
Development of the GTC Boathouse project on the City's site could be accommodated.
Design would occur if and when this alternative is pursued.
...
Actions Required to Implement the GTC Boathouse. A Conditional Use Permit (CUP)
from the City of Chula Vista would be required to implement the boathouse project on this
site, and a lease agreement between the City of San Diego and OTC Foundation would be
necessary, as with the proposed project. Approval through the Chula Vista Design Review
process would also be required. A California Department ofFish and Game 1603 permit
and an U.S. Army Corp Nationwide permit (Section 404) would be required, as with the
proposed project.
"'"
...
...
-
Environmental Impact Analysis of Alternative Location 1
...
This analysis is presented by environmental topic, as in Section 3 of this SEIR. Under
each environmental topic, a description of existing conditions or resources is provided,
followed by an impact analysis for each site, and finally a significance comparison of the
impact of the alternative as compared to the proposed project's impact. An alternatives'
summary/comparison of impacts is also provided in Section 1 of this SEIR.
...
...
....
...
4.10
;il1-/?V)
010571000
..
=@]
" I
~ 'l:fI
"'
"".
'"
"-
~
---
~
~
.
.
o
'S
~
c
.2
!
.
ili
.
>
~
!l
:c
z-
LLI-
c:I-
e,:, -
Q-
.
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
\ ~ . - ..
~ SOURCE: U.5.G.5. 7.5' Olay Mesa. Otay Mountain Ouadrangls
~10
~g,~~~
~I
o "N.2ooo1
I I
FEET
cg ~Z\\\''':~C 1~" \"1""
FIGURE
~
"",,- III'" ,--"" ---'111M ____, ,,,' 'N----------'/8< "\ ,.-.""""..."
OGDEN
.....
Alternative Site location Photo Key Map
lyA ~ /91P
4-13
,..
-
Impact Summmy
...
Although this alternative would avoid the majority of the project's operational/use conflicts
between the OTC water activities and City of San Diego recreational activities, the
alternative would result in much more significant biological, archaeological and aesthetic
impacts than the proposed project. It is therefore recommended that this alternative be
dismissed from further consideration, due to its overall environmental inferiority to the
proposed project
...
...
...
Recreational Use Compatibility
...
Existine: Conditions. The City of San Diego existing boat launch site is currently
developed with a dock (including permitting/operations office), boat launch, parking, small
cafe/snack shop and minor support maintenance uses. The site is illustrated in Figure 4-2,
Photo 1. The City plans to expand and improve the facility (grading and construction is
currently underway).
...
...
The North Point Site location is illustrated in Figure 1-2. As shown, the site is accessed
from Telegraph Canyon Road by a paved road to the point. The North Point site is mostly
vacant and composed of undisturbed habitat; the recreational area at the point has two shade
picnic structures, an outhouse and parking, operated under the City of San Diego Water
Utilities Department.
...
...
...
Impacts. Under the Alternative Location 1 relocation, the identified operations
incompatibility impact (Section 3.1) could be minimized. The OTC Boathouse operations
would be conducted on the existing City of San Diego boat launch site, which would
effectively be abandoned by the City of San Diego recreational operations. The City of San
Diego facility would be constructed across the lake. Many frequently used fishing
locations are on the east side of the lake (Le., Harvey and north arms of lake), thus
crossing the OTC rowing courses would be minimized and associated recreational land use
compatibility impact may be reduced but not completely avoided under this alternative.
...
...
...
...
A negative land use impact related to this alternative is that the alternative OTC Boathouse
location farther to the south would not be in optimal proximity to the OTC as is the
proposed project site (Le., walking to the OTC boathouse from the main OTC site would
not be as convenient and may require additional surface traffic commutes from efforts to
...
...
4-14
F-!f1-J97
010571000
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
shuttle athletes to and from the two OTC sites). This factor should be considered in the
alternative.
In summary. from an operational/recreational use impact standpoint. Aiternative Location 1
would be superior to the project for existing lake users, as it would reduce the
incompatibility impact identified between the fishing/recreation boats and the project's
rowing course alignment. A land use drawback of this alternative is that the OTC
Boathouse location farther south and at a greater distance from the OTC main area (across
Wueste Road) would render this location less efficient and less integrated into the overall
OTC project than the original, proposed location.
AestheticsNisual Resources
Existinl! Conditions. The existing San Diego boat launch facility is illustrated in
Figure 4-2, Photo 1. Views of the site and facility are readily available from along Wueste
Road and at the facility entrance.
The North Point site is situated at a predominant visual point of the lake. It can be viewed
from the north along Telegraph Canyon Road east of the North Point site entrance, from
the west at various points along Wueste Road (to the west/southwest) and from both the
OTC Boathouse site (Fignre 3-4a) and the existing City boat launch (Figure 4-2, Photo 1).
As described previously. the site is generally undeveloped with the exception of two shade
picnic structures, parking and an outhouse.
ImDacts. Alternative Location 1 would result in the development of City facilities at the
North Point site (currently undeveloped and not proposed for development by the project).
and implementation of the OTC Boathouse project at the existing City of San Diego boat
launch site. The Boathouse project site would remain undeveloped, consequently no
aesthetic impacts to that site and immediate area would occur.
The City of San Diego existing facility is planned and approved for expansion which is
currently underway, thus the implementation of the OTC Boathouse on that site would not
likely create unanticipated visual impacts beyond those currently existing and/or approved.
The actual OTC Boathouse site plan and structure would require further review (prior to
site plan approval) if this alternative is pursued. to ensure visual impacts are minimized.
010571000
4-15
/~ I} ~ / 9 ~
...
...
The North Point site would be developed with the City of San Diego expanded boat launch
facility. As the site is currently undeveloped and is a significant visual point of the lake,
this scenario would result in significant impacts to views from Telegraph Canyon Road,
Wueste Road, the lake and areas along the lakeshore. This impact would be unavoidable
and significant, due to the Nonh Point's predominant visual location. Such aesthetic
impacts would not result from the proposed project, as the Nonh Point site would not be
developed under the proposed project scenario.
...
...
...
In summary, Alternative Location 1 would eliminate the impacts to views of the proposed
project site (it would remain undeveloped); but it would result in significant and
unavoidable visual impacts to views of the Nonh Point site. The existing City boat launch
site would be developed under both the Alternative Location 1 and proposed project
scenarios, resulting in similar visual impacts to that site.
...
...
...
The alternative would also contribute, as would the proposed project, to the cumulative
aesthetic impact of ongoing development in the eastern Chula Vista and Otay Lakes areas.
...
Geology and Soils
...
Existinl! Conditions. The existing boat launch facility is located on the western shore of the
Lower Otay Reservoir at an elevation of 477 feet above mean sea level (MSL) and gently
slopes toward the reservoir. The geologic characteristics are similar to those of the
proposed project discussed in Section 3.3. The facility is located on Olivenhain cobbly
loam (OhE) which contains 9 to 3 percent slopes and Olivenhain Cobbly loam (OhC)
containing 2 to 9 percent slopes (Figure 3-6).
..,
...
...
The Nonh Point site is located on the nonheastern side of the reservoir at an elevation of
475 feet above mean sea level. The majority of the site is composed of undisturbed habitat
with the exception of the paved road and the southern most tip of the point which has been
graded for recreational facilities. The site slopes gently towards the reservoir. The Nonh
Point area is located solely on Olivenhain Cobbly loam (OhE) which contains 9 to
30 percent slopes (Bowman 1973). For characterizations of these soil units, see
Section 3.3 (Figure 3-6).
...
...
...
...
Imnacts. The impacts for Alternative Location 1 are similar to those impacts identified for
the proposed project
...
4.16
J~f/-/11
010571000
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Hvdrolo~/Water Ouality
Existine- Conditions. Drainage from the existing boat launch facility flows by sheet flow
directly to or via adjacent ephemeral streams to the reservoir. Due to the headland
topography present at the North Point, surface drainage can be expected to flow to the
west, south, or east, depending on location.
Since the water quality data is general in nature, the existing conditions are the same as the
proposed project discussed in Section 3.4.
Impacts. Locating the proposed project at the existing City of San Diego boat launch
facility and relocation of the City's facilities to Nonh Point would retain the originally
proposed site as open space/passive recreation. Relocation of the City facilities to North
Point and location of the proposed Boathouse at the existing City facilities would result in
mitigable impacts similar to those discussed for the project site discussed in Section 3.4.
Cultural Resources
Existimr Conditions. Two isolated anifacts were found on top of old asphalt paving in the
City of San Diego Boat Launch facility. Four shovel test pits (STPs) were excavated, two
near the location of the isolate anifacts, to test for a subsurface deposit Results of the test
were negative.
Two prehistoric sites within the boundaries of the North Point project area were recorded
as a result of the field survey. Site CA-SDi-11599 is a large, variable density artifact
scatter of stone debitage (waste flakes) and tools. Tools included two retouched utilized
flakes, two hammers tones, and four scraper tools. No features were observed in
association with this site. Site CA-SDi-l1600 is a light density scatter of stone debitage
and tools. There is a concentration of debitage surrounded by a light, diffuse scatter of
flakes and tools. More than 100 anifacts were observed on this site.
Three isolates were also recorded on the North Point site. One consist of two metavolcanic
flakes, one is a single scraper tool, and the last is a small Chione shell fragment. (The
presence of ocean shell at an inland location is evidence of human transport of that shell to
the location).
010571000
4-17
/iIA -), CJO
..
..
Impacts. No cultural resources are present within the City of San Diego Boat Launch
facility and therefore there will be no impacts in this area.
..
Site importance pursuant to CEQA criteria must be determined prior to consideration of
project-related impacts for the North Point site. If a site is determined llil1 to be important,
no impacts to that site are possible, according to CEQA. If, however, a site is determined
to be important, project-related impacts to the site must be addressed. Until site importance
is determined for CA-SDi-1l599 and CA-SDi-ll600, impacts cannot be considered.
-
...
..
The isolate finds in the North Point site are not important pursuant to CEQA, and therefore
no impacts to these fmds will occur.
..
In summary, development of the Alternative Location 1 site would not affect cultural
resources, except for the North Point area which may result in greater impacts to
archaeological resources than the proposed project, simply due to the presence of cultural
resources.
..
..
Biolo~cal Resources
..
Existin~ Conditions. The majority of the existing boat launch facility has been disturbed by
grading and a paved parking structure. Vegetation on the disturbed portion consists of
several eucalyptus trees (Eucalyptus sp.) and, along the edge of the pavement, some broom
baccharis associated with tree tobacco (Nicotiana glauca) (Figure 4-4). At the north and
south portions of the site, the shoreline of lower Otay reservoir is characterized by a
30-40 foot wide band of freshwater marsh dominated by bulrush and a thin band of
riparian scrub dominated by black willow. Rooted vascular aquatic bed habitat is found
below the water line at this site.
..
..
...
...
This alternative specifies the existing City of San Diego boat launch facilities be moved
across the lake to the North Point site (Figure 4-5). The vegetation community at this site
is characterized by a Diegan coastal sage scrub-grassland intergrade. The vegetation is
dense and the main components of the cover are Califoroia sagebrush and California
buckwheat. Native grassland species such as San Diego County needle grass, mesa
c1ubmoss (throughout openings in the coastal sage scrub), San Diego sunflower
(approximately 50 individuals), coast barrel cactus (Ferocactus viridescens) (approximately
40 individuals), and California gnatcatcher (at least 10 individuals observed).
..
..
..
..
4-18
JLjJj~ dJ} J.
010571000
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
), '
i' ,
.' .
~
~
C).
.
.
~
0 Q 4DD
, ,
FEET +
LEGEND
~.........."..'''....
...""..."....... FRESHWATER MARSH
!immmmmmmmm
.............................
Baccharis/Nicoliana
EUCALYPTUS
SOURCE: Westem Aerial Surveys
OGDEN
Vegetation Communities In the immediate Vicinity of
the Existing City of san Diego Boat Launch Site
.....
FIGURE
B
4-19
/Ljll/;)()'"
-
,
'- \ ....
,
-.U.
..... (
....
\ -
\..
'-
-
-
-
-
"'-,..,- -
,
..'.1.0 '
. i
..1"/-:"-',- ~
I
I
-
.,.
~ -~--'"
.)
,
) ,
... ..16.0
~.
./
....
~~
.'"
-
".'1-1
''I'.''
o
,
Q 400 f{" e.
,
FEET ,x
- ~
....
I '''M
,
.,,..
-
LEGEND
COASTAL SAGE SCRUBt
NATIVE GRASSLAND
FRESHWATER MARSH
-
-
Viguiera I~
~
...
OGDEN
.....
Vegetation Communities and Sensitive Plant
Species locations at the Nonh Point site, /
/ 71 - ;At) :3
----~~'\."'-.........--......~ ----
FIGURE
~
-
-
4.20
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Around the North Point site, the shoreline of lower Otay reservoir is characterized by a
30 to 40 foot wide band of freshwater marsh dominated by bulrush and a thin band of
black willow. Rooted vascular aquatic bed habitat is found below the water line at this site.
The quality of the wildlife habitat at the North Point site is considered high in the northern
portion of the site. The south portion of the site has been disturbed by vehicles, grading
and the installation of picnic tables. The habitats at this site support populations of coast
barrel cactus and California gnatcatchers and may support populations of grasshopper
sparrows (Ammodramus savannarum perpallidus), orange-throated whiptails, and San
Diego homed lizards. The sage scrub/native grassland habitat at the north portion of the
site is contiguous with sage scrub habitat at the north side of lower Otay reservoir;
however, habitats on the north side of Otay Lakes Road have been disturbed by grazing.
Imnacts. Alternative Location I consists of constructing the Olympic Training Center
boathouse facility at the site of the existing City of San Diego boat launch facility and
moving the City of San Diego's boat launch facility to the North Point site. Site plans for
the new boat launch facilities at the North Point site are not yet available; however,
assuming that approximately 15 acres at the extreme southern end of the North Point site
are required to build the new City facilities, approximately 11.4 acres of Diegan coastal
sage scrub (including approximately 50 individual San Diego sunflowers and
approximately 20 individual coast barrel cactus), and approximately 2.4 acres of freshwater
marsh habitat would be impacted. This analysis also assumes that all 15 acres of habitat
would be impacted. hnpacts to freshwater marsh could be substantially less than 2.4 acres
if facilities were designed to minimize impacts to this habitat. hnpacts to the coastal sage
scrub habitat, sensitive species populations, and the freshwater marsh habitat are
considered significant.
Ten individual gnatcatchers were detected at the North Point site in the non-breeding
season; however, no territory mapping has been completed in that area. The high quality of
habitat and the relative lack of disturbances in the area indicate that impacts to gnatcatchers
would be significant.
The Olympic Training Center boathouse project could have potentially adverse effects to the
mitigation measures for the secondary treatment facilities of the Clean Water Program as
implemented via the MSCP. These effects are considered to be significant and adverse
impacts as a result of decreasing the quality of the wildlife habitat at North Point.
010571000
4-21
;C!1- JtJL/
-
...
Indirect impacts as a result of the construction of the facility at this site could include
erosion and sliding of materials into wetland habitats, elevated noise levels, and a
potentially greater degree of human intrusion into the adjacent habitat. Any movement of
material into wetland habitats would be considered a significant adverse impact. Periodic
elevated noise levels due to vehicles associated with boat launching traffic could negatively
impact sensitive noise receptors such as vocalizing California gnatcatchers. Since
California gnatcatchers tend to be fairly resilient to elevated noise levels (ERCE
unpublished data) and since boat launching would occur only three times per week, this
potential impact is considered adverse but not significant. Any increase of human intrusion
into the habitat at the North Point site would be considered a significant negative impact.
...
..
...
...
...
Cumulative impacts include increased human access into sensitive habitats and the loss of
habitat and sensitive species populations on a regional basis and increased human activity
on the reservoir. The cumulative loss of Diegan coastal sage scrub and resident sensitive
species is considered a significant adverse impact.
...
...
Traffic/Circulation
...
Existine- Conditions. Local access to the existing San Diego boat launch facility and North
point site is provided by Telegraph Canyon Road and Wueste Road. Due to the
alternative's close proximity to the proposed Boathouse site, existing circulation network
conditions would be similar to the proposed project discussed in Section 3.7.
..
...
Impacts. Traffic generation rates of the OTC Boathouse would not change with
development of the facility at the existing San Diego boat launch site. As discussed in
Section 3.7 project-related traffic would be minimal, resulting in less than significant
impacts to the circulation network.
...
...
Cumulative long-term traffic impacts from planned buildout of the eastern territories
(including OTC and Boathouse project) would be the same as the proposed project,
discussed in Section 3.7.
..
...
...
..
4-22
11j/J~ J,fJ.5
010571000
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4.4 ALTERNATIVE LOCATION 2: CITY OF SAN DIEGO BOAT LAUNCH
(SHARED SITE)
Purpose and Description of Alternative Location 2
As an outcome of evaluating Alternative Location 1 (North Point site), another alternative
location was identified which would effectively retain both the North Point site and the
Boathouse project site as open space/passive recreation. In concept the alternative consists
of the implementation of the City of San Diego expansion project as originally planned, and
the development of the OTC Boathouse adjacent to the existing City of San Diego site.
Conceptual location of the alternative is illustrated in Figure 4-1; site 6 of the applicant's
alternatives evaluation is reviewed in the following paragraphs.
Environmental Impact Analysis of Alternative Location 2
Imnact Summary
This alternative would result in the retention of both the proposed project site and the North
Point site in open space, reducing biological and aesthetic impacts at those two sites. This
alternative would, however, result in more significant operational impacts and land use
conflicts (Le., access, loss of public parking, congestion, boat launching conflicts) than the
proposed project (Note that if additional offsite public parking is required for City of San
Diego operations, additional offsite environmental impacts would result.) It would also
necessitate a raised building pad (to adequately accommodate sewage flows/facilities),
potentially resulting in more significant visual impacts than the proposed project Although
technical issue areas would require further evaluation, this alternative would generally be
environmentally inferior to the proposed project.
Recreational Land Use Comnatibility!Qperations
Existin~ Conditions. The City of San Diego existing boat launch site is described in
Section 4.2 and illustrated in Figure 2-2 and Figure 4-2, Photo 1. Alternative Location 2
would require additional acreage in this area for the OTC Boathouse.
Impacts. If pursued, Alternative Location 2 would result in essentially similar recreational!
boating incompatibility impacts as the proposed project. The City's boat launching would
continue to operate as under existing conditions, with many fishing boats heading across
010571000
4-23
Jcj fJ <i-Pf:::,
-
...
the lake to the (east and northeast) angling areas of the lake. The OTC training and time
trial courses would need to be located as proposed (Figures 2-7 and 2-8, Section 2), thus
the original impact (Section 3.1) would also be present under this alternative. Site access,
parking and congestion could be worse under this alternative.
...
...
Further, the location of the OTC Boathouse at this site would not be in optimal proximity to
the main OTC site, rendering the Boathouse less integrated into the overall OTC. This
Alternative Location 2 is considered undesirable to the OTC from a land use and access
perspective, as is Alternative Location I. In summary, this alternative would result in
similar or greater recreational land use/operations impacts as the proposed project.
...
...
...
AestheticNisual Resources
Existinl! Conditions. The subject City of San Diego boat launch site is described in
Section 4.2 and illustrated in Figure 4-2, Photo I.
...
...
Impacts. Alternative Location 2 would result in the development of one larger site area
(City of San Diego existing boat launch), and the retention of both the project site and the
North Point site in their existing open space/passive recreational uses. This is clearly a
beneficial aesthetic effect on the project site and the North Point site, as they would not be
developed or altered. The City's facilities would be expanded, and the OTC Boathouse
would be constructed in the same general area as shown on Figure 4-1 (applicant's
alternatives analysis, site 6).
...
...
...
Some visual impact (above existing conditions) to the City's site would result from the
approved boat launch expansion project. Further visual impact in that area from the OTC
Boathouse project would result. It has been determined that a raised building pad or
two-story structure would be required to implement the OTC boathouse at this location (to
provide adequate sewer facility design), thus the structure's visual impact (especially to
public views from Wueste Road) would likely be greater than the proposed project's
single-story building. Mitigation could involve ample landscaping and revegetation
requirements similar to the proposed project's Landscape Plan. In summary, this
alternative would result in no aesthetic impacts to the proposed project site; it would result
in similar or greater visual impacts to public views from Wueste Road.
...
...
...
...
...
...
4-24
) tj /1" .)tJ 7
010571000
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Geolol!v and Soils
Existinl! Conditions. The subject City of San Diego site is described in Section 4.2.
Imnacts. The impacts for Alternative 2 are similar to those mitigable impacts identified for
the proposed project (Section 3.3).
HydroloLlYlWater Duality
Existinl! Conditions. The subject City of San Diego site is described in Section 4.2.
Impacts. The impacts for Alternative 2 are similar to those mitigable impacts identified for
the proposed project
Cultural Resources
Existinl! Conditions. Two isolated artifacts were found on top of old asphalt paving in the
City of San Diego Boat Launch facility. Four shovel test pits (STPs) were excavated, two
near the location of the isolate artifacts, to test for a subsurface deposit Results of the test
were negative.
Impacts. No cultural resources were identified within the City of San Diego Boat Launch
facility site and therefore no impacts are anticipated with this alternative. In summary, this
alternative may result in less significant impacts to cultural resources.
Biolo~cal Resources
Existinw Conditions. The majority of the existing City of San Diego boat launch facility
site has been disturbed by grading and a paved parking structure (Figure 4-4). Vegetation
on the disturbed portion consists of several eucalyptus trees (Eucalyptus sp.) and, along the
edge of the pavement, some broom baccharis associated with tree tobacco. At the north
and south portion of the site, the shoreline of lower Dtay reservoir is characterized by a
30-40 ft wide band of freshwater marsh dominated by bulrush and a thin band of black
willow. Rooted vascular aquatic bed habitat is found below the water line at this site.
010571000
4-15
;yll rJOY/
..
...
The quality of the wildlife habitat at this site is extremely low. The upland areas of this site
are almost completely devoid of native vegetation communities, the majority of the site
being either paved or graded. Eucalyptus trees onsite may provide roosts for raptors. No
sensitive species were detected onsite.
...
-
Imnacts. The biological impacts of locating both the Olympic Training Center boathouse
and the City of San Diego boat launch facilities at this site would be minimal relative to the
other alternatives. Impacts would probably total 0.1 acre of freshwater marsh habitat.
Impacts to wetland habitats would be considered significant, as with the proposed project.
Depending on the design and location onsite of the proposed OTC Boathouse, there could
potentially be no impacts to biological resources other than the small amount of wetland
habitat. For this reason this alternative is considered the preferred alternative from a
biological perspective.
...
-
...
...
Traffic/Circulation
...
Existinjl" Conditions. Local access to the City of San Diego existing boat launch site is
provided through Telegraph Canyon Road and Wueste Road. Existing road conditions of
the project vicinity are discussed in Section 3.7.
...
Impacts. Development of the Boathouse facility at the San Diego boat launch site would
result in site access and parking difficulties due to the decrease of available parking area.
Specifically regarding parking, approximately 110 public parking spaces for the City of
San Diego boat launch would be lost under this alternative (land is required for OTC
boathouse facility). The parking would either be lost or, if replaced, would require offsite
adjacent land, resulting in additional environmental impacts to the adjacent land.
Furthermore, traffic congestion (due to more activity) would occur at this alternative site
than at the proposed project site. Overall, traffic, access and parking impacts would be
more significant under this alternative than under the proposed project.
...
...
...
...
...
Long term cumulative traffic impacts would be similar to the proposed project as discussed
in Section 3.7.
-
...
...
4-26
IL/f/~ JtJ1
010571000
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4.5 ORIGINALLY PROPOSED PROJECT SITE
Description of Originally Proposed Project
The previously proposed project site is illustrated in Figure 4-1 (site 1 of the applicant's
alternatives evaluation). This site is located just to the north of the project site, closer to the
water's edge. This proposal, previously considered and designed in detail, involved a
two-story building with observation decks on the second story, and access to the lake from
the fIrst floor's cement deck area via two pedestrian pathways. Transition from the deck to
water's edge would be accomplished by a rock slope (2:1 slope ratio) which would begin at
the deck's edge and extend to the approximate 475-foot elevation at the water's edge. The
riprap slope of about 0.2 acre would provide protection and stabilization for the deck. This
alternative would result in the destruction of undisturbed sage scrub habitat and wetland
area (refer to following Biological Resources discussion).
Environmental Impact Analysis of the Originally Proposed Project
Imoact Summmy
This alternative was dismissed primarily due to biological and visual impact (see
following). Permitting through the state and federal resource agencies would be time
consuming and an alternative site would likely be recommended to minimize biological
impacts. It is recommended that this alternative be dismissed from further consideration
due to its environmental inferiority to the proposed project
Recreational Land Use Compatihilitv!Qperations
This alternative site would result in essentially the same compatibility impacts as the
proposed project, due to the two sites' similar relationship to the City facilities and existing
boat launching/courses. Boating course conflicts (Figure 3.1-2) would be similar.
AestheticNisual Resources
The originally proposed site is illustrated in Figure 4-2, Photo 2. This alternative would
result in similar or potentially more signifIcant visual impacts to distant public views from
the east lake shore, the lake itself, and from Telegraph Canyon Road, as compared to the
010571000
4.27
If II - )/ D
..
...
proposed project. The previously proposed project's two-story structure and riprap slope,
located at the water's edge, would be more visually apparent from the lake than the
project's newly designed single-story structure, set back from the lake's edge.
...
This alternative would result in generally similar direct visual impacts to views from
Wueste Road as compared to the proposed project. The previous project was a two-story
structure (as compared to the project's single-story building, however the topography and
existing Eucalyptus trees provided more screening of that site than the current proposal's
location). In effect, the currently proposed project's landscaping and revegetation will
provide adequate and similar screening and aesthetic softening (of views from Wueste
Road) as the previous project's natural screening and location, rendering similar impacts.
...
...
...
...
Geolo~ and Soils
...
This alternative would result in similar mitigable geological impacts to those of the
proposed project due to their close proximity (see Section 3.3).
...
Hydrolol!VlWater Quality
...
This alternative would result in similar mitigable hydrological impacts to those of the
proposed project due to their close proximity (see Section 3.4).
...
Cultural Resources
...
This alternative would not result in significant impacts to cultural resources, similar to the
proposed project.
...
...
BiolOlrical Resources
Existin!! Conditions. The original site alternative is located in the same general area as the
preferred alternative; however, it is located to the north in the undisturbed coastal sage
scrub habitat, and is situated closer to the water's edge and associated wetland habitat.
-
...
Imoacts. Construction of the boathouse facilities at this site would result in impacts to
approximately 1.2 acres of Diegan coastal sage scrub and 1.3 acres of disturbed coastal
sage scrub. Approximately 0.5 acre of freshwater marsh and 0.1 acre of riparian scrub
...
...
4-28
)cjf)~J) I
010571000
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
would be impacted by the rock slope protection and observation deck (Figure 4-6). The
impacts to both the good quality and disturbed Diegan coastal sage scrub are considered
significant because of the regional sensitivity of this habitat and because it supports
sensitive plant and animal species. The impacts to wetland habitats (freshwater marsh and
riparian scrub) are considered significant because of their high biological value and
protected status at the federal, state, and local levels. Construction of the project at this site
would also require the removal of two eucalyptus trees. Impacts to these trees are not
considered significant
The original site alternative would also impact part of one California gnatcatcher territory
(refer to Section 3.6 and Figures 3-7 and 3-8). The southern quarter of the territory will be
impacted, with indirect impacts to the remaining portion of the territory. The impacts to a
California gnatcatcher pair are considered significant due to the sensitive status of the
gnatcatcher, and the loss of a portion of their breeding territory. Gnatcatchers are a resident
species with a limited capability for dispersal. The majority of the suitable gnatcatcher
habitat in the area is already occupied, so dispersal is unlikely to occur.
Indirect impacts as a result of the construction of the facility at this site would include
erosion and sliding of materials into wetland habitats. Any movement of material into
wetland habitats would be considered a significant adverse impact
Cumulative impacts include the loss of habitat and sensitive species populations on a
regional basis and increased human activity on the reservoir. The cumulative loss of
Diegan coastal sage scrub and resident sensitive species is considered a significant adverse
impact. Potential significant impacts due to increased human activity could be mitigated by
implementing remedial measures (e.g. restricting shoreline access year round, adjusting
practice schedules) if significant adverse impacts are identified by the post-project wildlife
monitoring activities.
Traffic/Circulation
The originally proposed project alternative would result in similar traffic impacts as the
proposed project due to their close proximity. These impacts were not considered to be
significant on a project-specific level (refer to Section 3.7).
010571000
4-29
Flf! ~ ~/J,
..
LEGEND
FRESHWATER MARSH
WILLOW SCRUB
BaccharisINicatiana
EUCALYPTUS
OIEGAN COASTAL SAGE SCRUB
Viguiera laciniata
DISTURBED COASTAL SAGE SCRUB
NOTE: SELAGINELlA NOT MAPPED
..
-
-
-
Ql~
-
FEET
-
___.J
~I~"'~_-
-
-
...
...
-
...
i
--""-=
,
-
...
q'
...
...
OGDEN
.....
...
Vegetation Communities and Sensitive Plant
Species location at the OrIginally Proposed ~lti;J -;<;;3
4-6
...
4.30
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SECTION 5
REFERENCES
Browman, R.H. 1973. Soil Survey San Diego Area, California, United States
Department of Agriculture.
City of Chula Vista. 1982. Chula Vista General Plan, EastLake Policy Plan, City Council
Resolution No. 10996, September 7.
City of Chula Vista. 1987. Policy: Threshold/Standards and Growth Management
Oversight Committee, November.
City of Chula Vista. 1987. Revisions to the Master Fee Schedule, June.
City of Chula Vista. 1989. Chula Vista General Plan.
City of Chula Vista. 1989. City of Chula Vista General Plan Update. March.
City of Chula Vista. 1989. Municipal Code.
City of San Diego. 1987. Managers Report No. 87-94, February 20.
County of San Diego. 1984. San Diego County General Plan - 1995, Part II, Regional
Land Use Element and Map, August 22.
County of San Diego. 1984. San Diego County General Plan - 1995, Part XXIII, Otay
Subregional Plan, August 22.
County of San Diego. 1985. The Zoning Ordinance, San Diego County, November.
ERC Environmental and Energy Services Co. 1989. EastLake III/Olympic Training
Center Final EIR, October.
ERCE. 1990. Olympic Training Center SPA Plan Supplemental EIR (89-11), April.
Greensfelder, R.W. 1972. Maximum Credible Rock Acceleration from Earthquakes in
California, Map Sheet 23, California Division of Mines & Geology.
ICG Inc. 1990. Geotechnical Investigation Boathouse Site, U.S. Olympic Training
Center, San Diego County, California
ICG Incorporated. 1990. Geotechnical Investigation for Boathouse site, January.
Kennedy, M.P. and S.S. Tan. 1977. Geology of National City, Imperial Beach, and Otay
Mesa Quadrangles, Southern San Diego Metropolitan Area, California.
Kennedy, M.P. and S.S. Tan. 1977. Geology of National City, Imperial Beach, and Otay
Mesa Quadrangles, Southern, San Diego Metropolitan Area, California, Map
Sheet 29, California Division of Mines & Geology.
Real, C.R., T.R. Toppozada, and D.L. Parke. 1978. Earthquake Epicenter Map of
California.
010571000
5-1
/11/ ./)/1
...
-
Rick Engineering. 1991. Soakway Basin Conceptual Design Report.
USDA Soil Conservation Service. 1978. Soil Survey, San Diego Area, California.
-
-
...
..
...
-
..
...
...
...
-
...
-
..
-
-
5-2
,/
) '-/ 1l-)J:7
010571000
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SECTION 6
INDIVIDUALS AND AGENCIES CONSUL TED
California Department of Fish and Game
Terry Stewart
California State University, Sacramento
Craig Perez, Director of CSUS Aquatic Center
City of Chula Vista
Roger L. Daoust, Senior Civil Engineer
Carol Gove, Chula Vista Fire Department
Steve Griffm, Planning
Barbara Reid, Environmental ReviewlPlanning
Douglas Reid, Environmental Review Coordinator
Harold Rosenberg, City Traffic Engineer
Oifford L. Swanson, Deputy Public Works Director/City Engineer
Bob Sennett, City Landscape Architect
City of San Diego Lakes Committee
Glen Brandenburg
Kevin Mineo
George Hansen
City of San Diego Water Utilities Department
Vick Bianes, Water Conservation
Joe Caruso, Site Management at Otay City Facility
City of San Diego, Property
Jim Anthony
City of San Diego, Water Utilities Department
Larry Bottroft
Jim Brown
Lou Ann Holmes
Janet Myers
City of San Diego
Roger Frauenfelder, Deputy City Manager
Bob Bergreen, Chief, San Diego Police Department
...
...
Fulsom Lake State Recreation Area
Larry Froley, Chief Ranger
...
McKinley-SoPac
Laurie McKinley
...
Sacramento National Wildlife Refuge
M. Wolder
...
San Diego National Spons Training Foundation
David Nielsen
Bill Miller
...
...
San Diego National Spons Training Foundation
Don Goldman, Architect
Patrick Berry, Marketing
Keith Simon, Landscape Architect
...
...
San Diego Natural History Museum
Phil Unill
...
San Diego Unified Pon District
Fred Trull, Director of Planning
...
United States Fish and Wildlife Service
Nancy Gilben, Biologist
...
...
US Rowing
Patrick McNerney
...
USCKT
Leslie Kline
...
...
...
...
6.2
)'1/1 / J) 7 010571000
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SECTION 7
LIST OF PREPARERS AND CERTIFICATION OF ACCURACY
This report was prepared by ERC Environmental and Energy Services Company of San
Diego, California. ERCE's professional staff and consultants connibuting to the report are
listed below;
Ted Cooley; M.A. Anthropology
Susan Dahl; M.S. Geology
Julie McCall; B.A. Geography
Jeanne Munoz; Ph.D. Anthropology
Karlee Nevil-Kanner; B.A. Environmental Studies
Mark Sherwin; M.S. Marine Science
Teresa Tellez-Giron; B.S. Urban & Regional Planning
Mike White; Ph.D. Ecology
I hereby affIrm that to the best of our knowledge and belief, the statements and information
herein contained are in all respects true and correct and that all known information
concerning the potentially significant environmental effects of the project has been included
and fully evaluated in this EIR.
Julie McCall
Project Manager
010571000
7 -1
It/f/~J/r;(
...
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
This Page Intentionally Left Blank
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
7-2
/'-//1-), J 7
010571000
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDICES
JLI fl-;);)O
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX A
NOP/DISTRIBUTION LIST/RESPONSES
J 1-/ /I ",)2)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
. I V........ UI I"repilralIO" ..
. ~,.. . "'\.
...
"
Appendix ..
-
.
,.: State ClearinaHouse
(A..-y)
1400 Tenth Street. Rm. 121
(Addrw.)
Sacramento, CA 95814
Subject: Notice of Preparation of a Draft Envlronm.ntallmp.~ Repo"
..;<d Agency: COneUltln; Firm (If applicable):
. _JlIl:Y Namo City of Chula Vista rlml Name ERe Environmental
.. ;.:0, Addreu 276 Fourth Avenue Saeel Addrw ' 5510'Morehouse Drive
, ;: tlSlalc/Zip Chu1a V1sta, CA 92010 CitylSlIle/Zip San D1ego, CA 92121
, ,'llace Barbara Re1d ConllCl Jeanne Munoz
The City of Chu1 a Vista will be tho Lead Agency Illd will prcpnan environmenlll imPlClreport for the
jeceldenUfied below. W. need 10 Icnow the views of your agency u to Ibe scope IIIldconlOnlotlheenvironmenlal intonnalion which'
,.crmll\e lO your agency',slIlulOry responsiblUlies in connection wilh Ibe propolled projOCL Your esency wlll need to IIIllIho EIR
;':, :lnd by our agency when considering your pr.rmil or othor approval fOf tho project.
: '" projeel doscliplion. locallon. and the polential envlronmenlal offecll are contained in Ibe alllchecl malOlials. A COpy of the Inllilll
. '"dy ( CJ II ltl!I is nol) 1WlChed.
: } lO the lime limill mandated by Stale law. your response mUSI be senl allhe eorliesl possible dace bUI not III"" thll1l30 dily, alter
, JipI ot this notice,
..' '..Ise IOnd your roaponlC to Ba rba ra Re 1 d
.. . name for a contacl penon in your allency.
at the addrea shown above. WO will need
')ICtTllle: 01~P1C Tra1nin!l. Center Boathouse
n tne C1ty otl,;nl,tla V1!,ta aaJaeent to ana on t.he tiel::'", :lIIldc
; ",ectLocatlon: of the lower Ota Reservoir, 'ust east of Wueste Rd. ,SOUTHERLY OF
Oly(.......) FUTURE INTER~!;CTION 0 f ST u.hijiE
, , ;ect Description: (brio/)
Construct1on of 15,000 square foot boathouse, stag1ng deck w1th three
docks. Includes access road and 38 parking spaces.
July 10, 1990
Signature )!5' ~~
Tille An1stant Planner
TolQphone (61 g) 691.50117
C"",: CaliCDmla Adminilll'ative Code. Ti~e 14. (CEQA Quidelinel) Seeti~nl i5012(o), 1510~. 15375.
R,vil,d OCIt>b" /989
I
.~ ./ .... _./ r~""",_
-'72~~' "',//...7 -,.,,,~
JL!/J ./ 1 :2 ),
'-, ',--- -"::;0 ""':;0............ ....'.'...'"1\1151;
"-'...
. \ .
, A.IOun:a1 AOlngy
-
Boadn.A WII8rWI)'l
-
COUlII eomnu.aOll
-
_CauralCon.wncy
_CoIcndD Rl_ Boud
_CO'*"8lion
_ :..F'llb A Oame
-FotesIly
_omceofHialoric: ~
--ParU. Rocreadon .
IlecJamuioa
-S.P. Day ~. DeYelopmenl Commiaion
- WIIa' '-"OIIII:eI (DWR) ,
Bualn.... Tranlponltlon " HOUSIng
, .' ~Almnaullca
_CaUfomit H1Jbway PIInlI
. CALnANS DlmlcllI '11
--
Departmcnc olTl8IlSpOIWion Planning (~)
-
-HolIsiaC. Commllllity Developmenc
..;..;:. .:.FoDd .. Allrleulture
H.alth " W.I'....
_Healdl S~
',"'. '. ::;", 8tat... Consumer Slrvlee,
_GenuaJ Semca
_OLA (Sobaola)
...
oJ KEY
. .. DooII/MQIIIIU by I=" agency
X. Dovumanlllllt by SCH
". SUlPlted dlllribuliGn
...
-
IIIvllOnmlntlll Affllre
-Air Rlloun:a DOud .
-APCtl/AQMD
" Call1lll11la Ware MenalCllle/lc Board
-
-8WRCB: CIclut Wuu 011II11
_SWRCB: tleIta Unit
-5W1tCB: Wi_Qualley
-SWRC:II W.. RJPII
-RecfonaI WQCB "1 \
Youth.. Mult CorTlCtlon'
_COn'llllliDll8
Inalpendent Commllllan' " Offici'
-!fteqy Commillion
-Native "'mtrican Hcrieqe Commialon
-Public UliIiliea Cammlaion
_SIma ManIca MoanllIIu CoIIIoMncy
trace Llncla Commlaion
-
_Tahoe Relional Planning Apncy
..
....
:.'.~:~~
:~..
.n,
..,;-~t-:.
'<'AI.,
"
1
:i;
, ,,;.J!,
";:,;i\~~
.l~
. ,7'~~'~~\'"
. .; ~ ,',I
'..L';(':~
_0lhIr
......,. .;j
" ,','.,
--~----------~~-
-----~-----~--------~----
PubliC RevIew PerIod (10 be r.Jlcd In by 1000001Ilency)
OP 30 days after receipt of HOP
, SllIrting DlIce Ullon recei pt of H Endinll D~
SiJ:naluro -. c.;r? ?4-' DlIlO ,Julv 10~ 1990
------~----------------------------------
L..d Agency (Complete if appDcabfe);
Consultlnll Finn:
Adllre":
, CilyIS1lI1CJ2ip:
I Cllm~cl:
! Ph/ln~: <--->
,
AppliCtlnl:
Add~..:
Cil)'/St:ll~/Zjp; _
Phnll~: I_I
...
~
....
...
For SCH U.. Only,
DlIlC Rcccivecllll SCH
l>~lC Review SllIn&
D~lC 10 Agencies
DaIC 10 SCH
CI~urlln~. Dal'
NOltl:
...
-
...
-
-
...
;11} -,)8;5
R"'U,d n,.,nh,., 10.'0
'0,
...
,
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
\ "
\..<
'--'
NOTICE OF PREPARATION
TO:
State Clearing House
1400 Tenth Street, Rm. 121
Sacramento. CA
FROM: Planning Department
City o~ Chu1a Vista
P. O. Box 1087
Chu1a Vista. CA 92012
SUBJECT: Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report
CASE NO: EIR-90-12
The City of Chu1a Vista will be the Lead Agency and will prepare an
environmental impact report fOr the project identified below. We need
to know the views of your agency as to the scope and content of the
environmental information which is germane to your agency's statutory
responsibilities in connection with the proposed project. Your agency
will need to use the EIR prepared by our agency when considering your
permit or other approval for the project.
The project description, location, and the probable environmental
effects are contained in the attached materials. A copy of the Initial
Study I I is, I xx i is not, attached. ..
Due to the time limits mandated by State law, your response must be
sent at the earliest possible date but not later than 30 days after
receipt of this notice.
Please send your response to; Douglas D. Reid, Environmental Review
Coordinator, at the address shown above. We will need the name fOr a
contact person in your agency.
PROJECT APPLICANT, IF ANY: San Diego National Sports Training Foundation
DATE: July 10, 1990
Signature:. ..s,d ~
Title: Assistant Planner
Telephone: (619) 691-5097
Reference; California Administrative Code, Title 14, Sections
15035.7, 15054.3, 15066.
EN 12 (Rev. 12/82)
'. ;v fJ / J)L/
-
'-'
-
PRELIMINARY CONTENTS OF THE EIR
...
-
1.0 Introduction ,~
1.2 Executive Summary
2.0 Project Description -
3.0 Impact Analys;s
....
3.1 Biological Resources
3.1.1. Project Setti ng -
3.1.2. Impact
3.1.3 Mitigation
3.1.4 Analysis of significance "'"
3.2 Cultural Resource
(same as above) -
3.3 Geology/So;ls "'"
3.4 Drainage/Hydrology/Water Quality
..
3.5 Land Form Visual
Alternatives ...
3.6
3.7 Mitigation Monitoring ....
-
..
...
"'"
....
)~A"J-d-5
-
.
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
\,...-
'--'
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
UNITED STATES OLYMPIC TRAINING CENTER BOATHOUSE
The San Diego National Sports Training Foundation proposes development of a
boathouse, to be constructed in conjunction with the United States Olympic
Traini n9 Center located in the City 01' Chul a Vf sta. The boathouse w111 e
sited adjacent to Lower Otay Reservofr, on land leased from the City of San
Diego. The boathouse will be an fntegral part of the new Olympic Training
Center and, as such, wfll be owned and operated by the United States Olympic
CllIIIIIfttee (USOC).
The Olympic boathouse will consist 'of a single structure, large enough
(approximately 15,000 square feet) to accommodate the storage of shells,
kayaks. and canoes. Adjacent to the building, on the water side, will be a
staging deck with three docks providing water access for trafning of rowers,
canoers and kayakers as organized by the USOC. A viewing tower may be located
along the edge of the Reservoir, or may be constructed as i floating tower.
An access road, from Wueste Road to the site, and a 38-space parking lot are
included in the site phn, and will be available for publ1c use, as well as
use by the Training Center. In addition, l1mited landscaping, along the
peninsula adjacent and south of the boathouse is planned IS part of the
project.
Development 01' the boathouse will require approval of a Conditional Use Permit
(CUP) by the City of Chula Vista and approval of a land-lelSe by the City of
San Diego. A rowing course and operational phn, detailing the expected
training use on the Reservoir will be submitted with the CUP. The operational
plan will be developed in conjunction with existing Lake user groups, the City
of San Diego Lakes Committee and input from interested members of the
community.
As an a1 ternative to the project, the existing pUblic boat launch, pier and
concession stand could be relocated to a peninsula located on the northern
shore of the reservoir cOllllllOnly known IS "northpoint", and then the OTC
Boathouse could be located in the al ready disturbed area formerly occupied by
the public launch/pier as shown on the attached map.
WPC 8018P
) rJl} rJJ-~
""
Eacondido
'"
-
...
FI.ncno
Sante Fe
...
.."
/
~
~
.- T--- -'.
1+
I
I B Cajon
....
~
+
"'l
...,
.~
~~
\
\
.\
o;.~
"
j
\
"'l
....
Xi
-l!!
i
\
i
i
\ lmperi.1 e..ch
\ '*
\ M
....
,j
I PIIOJeCT SITE LOCATION I
""
,
4
Regional Location Map
0
,
Q
NO SCALE
FIG U R E
/'1;9 -j.;L 7 2-1
.,
i
.:,
j
'" IRC
_~ Environmental
and Enervy
Services Co.
,
j
'1
-.l.,
~
~
'r.......__ -
ffi N
~ II.
0
.-=: ...
10I
Cl
~
J
I
I
t w
ton
f ::>
0
:c
I I-
<(
0
I l:C
U
-
, ~
:or ~
~ >
I ...J
>< 0
.00 :or
10
... ....
I 9 x:
Ei
I ~ ==
0
ii ~
CII:
"E
I
I
I
I
I .. ;Lj/l /)2.75'
.--......... .~.....-
"-- ~-- -.,
I ._._~
.....-...",,-
--' -... -- ,
~',
1"'" '
.......--
....,
'\. ...
~
o
~
i
Ll.......
.. ..
I
I
I
i
I
;
I I~
II'! III
I! II If II
L
-r- -,...
".I" I I
. 't.!
1\' .
I~'':.
.~11.~
k(
!
IJI I
y: I
I
-
._.",=-~
-
" .
'~"
I
,
I !
I I
! ,
II ~ I
~i ~ II
I .J f II
I .. i
I I,
a I
i
".T
"1
, I
\ .L. .:
. .
I I
1
u .).,
'''I
II;
:j
'j
'~
I
.
~ I'
-I
1'1
r
'.
FIIJ - J-'J. ~
-~. ..-. ---
...
N
... ""
o
N
~ -
f
....
,
...
'"'
....
U,/
U')
::>
o
J:
~
o
c:l
..
""\
.,
u
-
Q..
~
>-
...I
o
....
...
,
-~
~
...
...
"'"
...
..
""'I
.....-......-
.
.
I
t
I
I
----
<llnuntll nf ~an ~icgn
GRANVILLE M. BOWMAN
DIRECTOA
(8191 884-2212
ILOCAnON CODE 71501
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
COUNTY ENGINEER
COUNTY AIRPORTS
COUNTY ROAD COMMISSIONER
TRANSPORTATION OPERATIONS
COUNTY SURVEYOR
FLOOD CONTROL
LIQUID WASTE
SOLID WASTE
5556 OVERLAND AVE. SAN DIEGO. CALIFORNIA 92123-1296
I
t
August 15, 1990
I
I
t
Ms. Barbara Reid
Assistant Planner
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 92010
'\UG "I
Dear Ms. Reid:
Subject: Olympic Training Center Boathouse NOP and comments for the
Olympic Training Center FEIR
I
t
The Department of Public Yorks Environmental Services Unit has
reviewed the Notice of Preparation for the Olympic Training
Center (OTC) Boathouse; we are not a Responsible Agency for the
project. Ye have no comments at this time.
I
t
I
Ye have searched our files for the OTC SPA Plan and believe that we
were not notified of this project. Assembly Bill 40 (Eastin Chapter
626) requires the local agency to consult and provide notice and
copies of environmental documents to transportation planning agencies
and public agencies with transportation facilities that could be
affected by the project. DPY is such an agency. Therefore we are
including the following comments pertaining to the SPA Plan:
1. Entrance road improvements to the facility are not identified,
i.e., traffic control such as left-turn pockets and traffic
signals are not mentioned.
I
I
2. Leaving Yueste Road as it currently exists is not acceptable.
This roadway needs upgrading to light collector or residential
collector standard, i.e.,40 feet of A.C. on 60 feet of R/Y with
curb, gutter and sidewalk for the considerable pedestrian travel
along Otay Lake.
I
I
3. An onsite transit shelter stop for several buses would be
desirable for this proposal. Since many of these visitors will
use mass transit (air, rail and bus) to access this development.
4. Improvement of Orange Avenue and Hunte Parkway also should be
clearly identified.
I
;ill- ;)30
Printed on Recycled Paper
.. /
,/
Y
t,
-
,
.....
Barbara Reid
August 15, 1990
Page 2
..,
AI
Our Solid Yaste Division advises that the project is subject to the
recycling requirements of the California Integrated Yaste Management
Act of 1989 (A.B. 939).
..
Thank you for the opportunity to comment on the boathouse project.
Please respond in writing regarding our concerns about the SPA Plan
to Dirk Smith at the address below:
"'"
County of San Diego
Department of Public Yorks
5555 Overland Ave. Mail Station 0340
San Diego, CA 92123-1295
~
...
Very truly yours,
~c ?t... ./ )
~SHARON JASEK REID
Deputy Director
"'\
"'l
SJR:DDS
"
..
.
....
-
...
.'\
...
AI
)l1/J~J31
~
I
Ii
t
I
I
t
I
I
I
I.
I
t
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
stAm OF CALlFO/INIA-TI12 moullW AoeNCY
GlORe! DI!UKMt::JIAI"ol, oo..~f
DEI~ARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME
<ISO Golden Shore, Suite "60
l.ona Beaoh, CA 90802
1213) 590-5113
.
Auiust 22, 1990
Barbara Reid
City of Chula Viata
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 9201Q
Dear Mil. Reid:
We have reviewed the No~ioe of Preparation of a Draft BIR for
the Olympic Training Center Boathouse (SeH 90010709). To
enable .our staff to adequately review and comment on this
projeot, we recommend the following information be inoluded
in the Draft BIR:
1. A complete assessment of flora and fauna within and
adjaoent to the projeot area, with particular
emphasis upon identifyini endangered, threatened and
looally unique species and sensitive and oritioal
habitatS. Much of the area around Lower Otay
Reservoir oontaina Dieian coastal sale habitat, one
that is rapidly becoming a threatened habitat due to
development. This habitat a180 is prime habitat tor
the orange-throated whiptail and the ooast horned
li~ard, both oandidate II species for federal
liatina. Of these two species of concern, the ooast
horned lizard has been observed on numerous occasions
in 1989 and 1990 in the coastal 8ale habitat around
the Lower Otay Reservoir. We recom~end that surveys
for these two reptile species be 80heduled in the
8prina, preferablY from Maroh throu,h May.
2. A disoussion of direot, indireot, and oumulative
i~p~oto G~pGct@d tn adversely affeot biolo,ioal
resouroes, with specific measures to offset suoh
impaotS.
3. A discussion of potential adverse impacts from any
inoreased runoff. sedimentation, soil erosion, and/or
urban pollutants on streams and watercourses on or
near the project site. with m1tiaation measures
proposed to alleviate such impaots. Stream buffer
areas and maintenance 1n th~1r natural condition
through non_struotural flood oontrol methods should
also be oonsidered in order to oontinue their high
value as wildlife corridors.
ILj/) ~;)3J-
-
....
Barbara Reid
-2-
A\uNst 22, 1990
...
4. A diucu.sion of alternatives to not only minimize
adverse impacts to wildlife, but to include direot
benefit to wildlife and wildlife habitat. Those
disoussions should consider the Department of Fish
and Game's policy that there should be no net loss of
wetland acreaae or habitat values. We oppose
projects whioh do not provide adequate mlti.ation for
such losses.
""
...
....
6. A oomplete disouaslon of impacts associated with
"water activitiea" proposed for Lower Otay Lake.
Impacts to fish and wildlife resources should include
miaratory waterfowl, and to the water quality of the
lake.
...
6. A thorough disoussion on the compatibility of the
proposed uses on the lake with the existina
reoreational uses for fishin. and huntin..
Presently, there are two reoreational pro.ram. at
Lower Otay Reservoir. These inolude a fishing
reoreational pro.ram from January through October,
three days a week, annually, and a huntin. program
from October throuah January, two days a week, eaoh
year. We need to know what neiative impaots the
Olympio Training Center facilities and future
schedules will have on these pro.rams and what
measures will be implemented to offset the adverse
impaots. Also discuss the route(s) of activity on
the lake.
...
....
...
-
..
Diversion, obstruotion of the natural flow, or ohanges
in the bed, ohannel, or bank of any river, stream, or
lake will require notifioation to the Department of Fish
and Game as oalled for in the Fish and Oame Code.
Notifioation should be made after the projeot iA
approved by the lead aaenoy.
....
-
Thank you for the opportunity to review and oomment on
this projeot. If you have any que8tions, please contaot
Kris Lal of our Environmental Servioes staff at (213)
590-8137.
...
Sinoerely,
<<eM~
Fred Worthl.y
R..ional Manager
Reaion 5
-
-
....
/illJ J]J
-
I
t
I
I
I.
"
t
I
J
I
I
I
I
l
I
I
,
I
I
I
SAN DIEGO COUNCIL OF BASS CLUBS
110 West C Street, Suite 2100
San Diego, California 92101
(619) 233-4711
ESCONDIDa BASS PROS HIDDEN VALLEY BASSMASTERS NORTH CQUNn' BASS
MID-WEEK BASS ANGLERS OLD PROS RAMONA BASS AS"GLERS ROADRANGERS BASS CLUB
SAN DIEGO BASS BUSTERS EAST COUNTY 8ASSMASTERS SAN DIEGO BASSMASTERS SAN DIEGO BASS PROS
THE BASS COMPANY BUSHWACKERS BASS CLUB SAN DIEGO STROKERS BASS CLUB
SASSY BASS.HERS SOUTHLAND BASS CLUB BASS C.LD.B. ~BAA SAN DIEGO PENDLETON BASSERS
HOOKERS BASS CLUB SAN OlEGO BASS COUPLES
July 30, 1990
city of Chula vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula vista, Ca 92010
Attn: Barbara Reid
Re: project Title: Olympic Training Center Boathouse
Gentlemen:
in response to the Notice of Preparation
Impact Report in regard to the above-
This letter is sent
of Draft Environmental
referenced project.
It is the opinion of the San Diego council of Bass Clubs that
the Environmental Impact Report should consider the following
environmental impacts:
1.
accounted
year;
The negative impact on current recreational users, which
for the sale of 25,000 day use permits in the past fiscal
2. The negative impact on the reservoir as a premier large-
mouth bass and other warm water species fishery;
3. The negative biology impact on lake fauna resulting from
the placement and use of the first and only permanent structure on
its shores;
4. The negative impact on the fishery of placing a permanent
rowing course in the lake itself;
5. The negative impact on the use by hunters, in allowing
the construction and use of the boathouse and permanent race
course;
L. Kevin Mineo President
Steve Brecko Vice President
Barbara Small SecretaryiTreasurer
JLIf/ - ::r]1J
""
.l!I,
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, Ca 92010
Page 2
...
6. The possible alternative of locating the boathouse and
rowing course on another reservoir in San Diego County;
.....
7. The negative impact on the current use of pleasure craft
by the general public on the reservoir in the area where the
permanent olympic training course is to be placed;
8. The negative impact on the loss of use of the lake
facility as a park and recreation facility for current users;
9. The negative impact of allowing concurrent use by several
hundrad peo~le, who are net sensitive to the water rese~.oir or
fishery aspect of the lake facility, to use the facility in a
unrestricted and unsupervised atmosphere.
...
...
...
...
It is important for the Planning Department to understand that
this is a very scarce recreational resource in Southern California,
and there are no other alternative sights being constructed for
fresh water fishing and hunting pursuits. It is also important to
understand, although unique in Southern California, this lake is
also unique in the entire United States due to the unusual
production of trophy largemouth bass. The proposed project would
have a severe negative impact on that fishery.
.....
...
It is also recommended that the EIR be submitted and reviewed
by Boating and Waterways, by the Department of Fish and Game, by
Parks and Recreation, and by Water Resources.
...
The contact person for the Counsel of Bass Clubs is myself,
and you can feel free to contact me at the phone number listed
above.
...
....
Sincerely Yours,
~~:~ f
L. KeV1 M1neo, PreS1 ent 0
San Diego council of Bass Clubs
-
...
LKM:hv
cc: Jeanne Munoz
ERC Environmental
Douglas D. Reid
Environmental Review Coordinator
city Lake Committee
'"
....
...,
Ii-I/! ./ JJ5
...
I
I
I
I
I
",
I
I
I
t
I
t
I
,
I
,
I
I
.
\,
-
THE CITY OF
SAN DIEGO
-----, ~
, ,
FIRST INTERSTATE PLAZA. 401 B STREET, SUITE 600
SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92101 . 4229. Mail Station 960
ENGINEERING DIVISION
WATER UTIUTIES DEPARTMENT
53).'200
August 17, 1990
AVe 2 ~
c ./.Q--'-
Barbara Reid
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 92101
Dear Ms. Reid:
Subject:
Olympic Training Center Boathouse
The City of San Diego Water Utilities Department would like to
thank you for the opportunity to comment on our needs regarding
the Environmental Impact Report for the subject project.
The Lower Otay Lake is an important potable water supply for the
City of San Diego, and impacts on water quality by urbanization
or adjacent facilities are becoming increasingly important. For
this reason, we are very concerned about any impact the boathouse
project could have on the lake.
It is our understanding that boathouse project will include
facilities and activities which could potentially impact Lower
Otay Lake. These include the sewer pump station serving the restGj
rooms and lockers, parking lot for the boathouse, and boating
operations. The presence of the pump station and parking lot" \1;:,,"0-'>
increase the chance of a sewage spill and contaminated runoff '-]"0 ,.0\
flowing into the lake. The fueling of chase boats used at the V.0 ~; c\ ' ;
boathouse and boat-washing activities increase the likelihood of:';- '.' "',
fuel spills and detergents being washed into the lake.~'~~
o'..;,....c-~.~
I ,-...:"'~
We have already had preliminary discussions regarding these con-
cerns with several of the parties involved in this project.
However, these issues and their proposed mitigation should also
be formally addressed in the EIR.
Thank you for the
this time.
ior Civ1l Engineer
Engineering Division
BM/jw
cc:
R. Graff
F. Maitski
B. Mumford
. 0-.........._
) rj/l / ))b
-
...
Co
v..,
.}.
~
~t::::.~. ~~
~ 0 ~
C' '"
1- ...
.. (,
~O e;.O
(Oel c,.,-
. Q\ECO
'"
"'~
...
San Diego County Archaeological
Environmental Impact Report Review Committee
P. O. Box A-81106 San Diego, CA 92138
Society, Inc.
...
July 29, 1990
.,
;! I
....
To:
Ms. Barbara Reid, Assistant Planner
Planning Department
City of Chu1a Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chu1a Vista, California 92010
...
AUG
1 1990
-
Subject:
Notice of Preparation of a Draft Environmental Impact Report
Olympic Training Center Boathouse
....
Dear Ms. Reid:
...
Thank you for the subject Notice of Preparation, received by this Society
earlier this month.
""
We are pleased to note the inclusion of cultural resources in the list of
issues to be addressed in the DEIR for this project. We look forward to the
opportunity to review the DEIR and its cultural resources technical report(s)
when the public review period begins.
..
The San Diego County Archaeological Society appreciates being included in
the City's environmental review process for this project.
...
Sincerely,
...
~o~~.
~~;p:;s:~~l~IRJ~~V~ ~~ttee
....
...
cc: file
...
-
...
,-
)CIIl / )37
,
...
I
,
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
'I
I
,
I
I
,
I
I
I
-
STAn OF CALIFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGeNCY
GEORGE DEUKMEJIAN. Gowmor
DEPARTMENT OF BOATING AND WATERWAYS
1629 S STREET
SACRAMENTO, CA 958'4-7291
(916) ~281
II
.
JUt' 3-1 1990
July 26, 1990
Barbara Reid
City of Chula vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 92010
Dear Barbara Reid:
The Department of Boating and Waterways has no comment
on the city of Chula vista's Notice of Preparation of a
draft Environmental Impact Report for the Olympic
Training Center Boathouse (SCH# 90010709).
However, we would like to receive a copy of the draft
Environmental Impact Report when it becomes available.
Thank you for the opportunity to review the above
mentioned document.
Sincerely,
wfdLVE~
Director
cc: State Clearinghouse
J rj f/ / :rJrz'
ENGINEERING
and
DEVELOPMENT
DEPARTMENT
o Priated -1'eC:JICIed....-
-
...
THE CITY OF
to
SAN DIEGO
----.. ~
'jl'
ii
'f.
CITY OPERATIONS BUILDING . 1222 FIRST AVENUE . SAN DIEGO CA 92101-4154
JLi~ 24 1990
...
...
July 19, 1990
File No.: 482
-
Dou9las D. Reid
Environmental Review Coordinator
Planning Department
City of Chula Vista
P.O. Box 1087
Chula Vista, CA 92012
-
-
SUBJECT: U.S. OLYMPIC TRAINING CENTER BOATHOUSE
'"
This letter is in response to your notice of preparation of a draft
environmental impact report for the U.S. Olympic Training Center Boat-
house. From a traffic standpoint, this project appears to have very
little impact on the surrounding street system. Therefore, we have no
comments regarding the scope or content of the ErR.
.,
-'
Sincerely,
(Ji!t-lftt/1
Allen Holden, Jr.
Deputy Di rector
Transportation Planning Division
"'I
,
.....
DKS:bjl
dks/482/ltr, ,175
...
...
-
-
...
)1/1/" ) 37
....
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
,
t
I
I
I
-
THE CITY OF
SAN DIEGO
CITY ADMINISTRATION BUILDING . 202 C STREET . SAN DIEGO, CA 92101 - 3864
OFFICE OF
PLANNING
DEPARTMENT
236-6460
August 15, 1990
Barbara Reid
City of Chu1a vista Planning Department
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 92010
AVe 21
1990
Dear Ms. Reid:
SUBJECT: NOTICE OF PREPARATION (NOP) OF EIR FOR OLYMPIC TRAINING
CENTER BOATHOUSE
The City of San Diego Planning Department has reviewed the Notice of
Preparation (NOP) for the proposed Olympic Training Center Boathouse.
The proposed project would be located on city-owned property and would
require Council approval of the property lease to the applicant, San
Diego National Sports Training Foundation. Therefore, the City of San
Diego would be a responsible agency per CEQA. In order for the EIR to
be certified for Council approval of the lease, the document should be
prepared to the satisfaction of the City of San Diego. The
Environmental Analysis Section will be available to participate in the ~
preparation of the EIR. Please allow enough time in the process for
City staff to review the draft EIR before it is distributed for public
review. please contact Janet Myers at 236-5994 regarding this
project.
In response to the Notice of preparation, we recommend that the EIR
address land use and traffic issues. Potential land use issues may be
consistency with general and community plans, conversion of open space
to development and conflicts with recreational uses. Potential
traffic issues may be the capacity of existing rods to handle traffic
generated by the prop.o_s~ use. as well as SUIR'll"t-ive imoacts -
associated with -Ule proposed expansion of the Dublic docking facility.
We appreciate the opportunity to participate with the City of
Chula vista in the preparation of this document.
sn~
Ann B. Hix
Principal Planner
ABH:sml
Ii/! ~ )JIO
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I-
APPENDIX B
DRAFT MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
IN ACCORDANCE WITH AB3180
)14/).'-1/
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
OTC BOATHOUSE FACILITY
DRAFT
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
IN ACCORDANCE WITH AB 3180
APRIL 1992
;'/;f ~ )~).
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
t
,
I
I
I
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
The mitigation monitoring program is prepared for the City of Chula Vista for the Olympic
Training Center (GTC) Boathouse Facility project to comply with AB 3180, which requires
public agencies to adopt such programs to ensure effective implementation of mitigation
measures. This monitoring program is dynamic in that it will undergo changes as
additional mitigation measures are identified and additional conditions of approval are
placed on the project throughout the project approval process.
This program will serve a dual purpose of verifying completion of the mitigation measures
for the proposed project and generating information on the effectiveness of the mitigation
measures to guide future decisions. The Program includes the following:
. Monitoring team qualifications
. Specificmooitoringacti~~s
. Reporting system
. Criteria for evaluating the success of the mitigation measures
The project involves the land development of 3.1 acres for the GTC Boathouse facility and
0.07 water surface acre for the proposed dock and ramp. It is located in the eastern
territories area of Chula Vista, immediately west of Lower Otay Reservoir. The property
lies approximately 8 miles east of downtown Chula Vista and 8 miles north of the
US/Mexican border. The site is generally flat with elevations ranging from approximately
480 feet above mean sea level (msl) at the lake edge to about 500 feet msl at the proposed
parking lot area. The surrounding area is characterized by the rural Otay Reservoir and
undeveloped nearby hillsides. The developing communities of eastern Chula Vista (i.e.,
Eastlake) are located to the west. The site is bounded by Wueste Road and the developing
OTC site to the west, the existing City of San Diego boat launching facility to the south,
and other City and County facilities toward the south end of the reservoir.
The property is within City of Chula Vista incorporated boundaries. County of San Diego
jurisdiction borders to the site's north and east; these areas include North Point, the lake
and lands to the east. The City of San Diego owns the Lower Otay Reservoir and
surrounding lake front areas which include the proposed Boathouse site.
010571000
1
/ if /J - :2L/3
"'l
....
The SEIR environmental analysis, incorporated herein as reference, focused on issues
determined to be potentially significant by the City of Chula Vista. The environmental
analysis concluded that for 6 of the 7 environmental issues discussed, some of the
significant and potentially significant impacts could be avoided or reduced through
implementation of recommended mitigation measures. The 6 issue areas are recreational
land use compatibility; aesthetics/visual resources; geology and soils; hydrology/water
quality; biological resources; and traffic/circulation. No significant adverse cultural
resource impacts were identified.
...
~
...
-
AB 3180 requires monitoring of only those impacts identified as significant or potentially
significant; the monitoring program for the OTC Boathouse therefore addresses the impacts
associated with the issue areas identified above.
...
...
Miti~ation Monitorin~ Team
A monitoring team should be identified once the mitigation measures have been adopted as
conditions of approval by the Chula Vista City Council. Managing the team would be the
responsibility of the Mitigation Compliance Coordinator (MCC). The monitoring activities
will be accomplished by the Environmental Monitors (EMs), Environmental Specialists
(ESs), and the MCC. While specific qualifications should be determined by the City of
Chula Vista, the monitoring team should possess the following capabilities:
...
'"
...
"'"
. Interpersonal, decision-making, and management skills with demonstrated
experience in working under trying field circumstances;
. Knowledge of and appreciation for the general environmental attributes and
special features found in the project area;
. Knowledge of the types of environmental impacts associated with construction
of cost-effective mitigation options; and
. Excellent communication skills.
"'l
...
...
~
The responsibilities of the MCC throughout the monitoring effort include the following:
-
.
Overall implementation and management of the monitoring program
Quality control of the site-development monitoring team.
Administration and preparation of daily logs, status repons, compliance repons
and the final construction monitoring report.
"'"
.
.
...
2
pill / :Jt/1
010571000
...
Ii
I
I
I
I
I
~
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I
I
I
. Liaison between the City of Chula Vista, the OTC Boathouse developer, and the
applicant's contractors.
. Monitoring of onsite, day-to-day construction activities, including the direction
of EMs and ESs in the understanding of all permit conditions, site-specific
project requirements, construction schedules and environmental quality control
effort.
. Ensure contractor knowledge of and compliance with all appropriate permit
conditions.
. Review of all construction impact mitigations and, if need be, propose
additional mitigation.
. Have the authority to require correction of activities observed that violate project
environmental conditions or that represent unsafe or dangerous conditions.
. Maintain prompt and regular communication with the onsite EMs and ESs, and
OTC Boathouse personnel responsible for contractor performance and permit
compliance.
The primary role of the Environmental Monitors is to serve as an extension of the MCC in
performing the quality control functions at the construction sites. Their responsibilities and
functions are to:
a) Maintain a working knowledge of the OTC Boathouse permit conditions,
contract documents, construction schedules and progress and any special
mitigation requirements for his or her assigned construction area;
b) Assist the MCC and OTC Boathouse construction contractors in coordinating
with City of Chula Vista compliance activities;
c) Observe construction activities for compliance with the City of Chula Vista
permit conditions; and
d) Provide frequent verbal briefings to the MCC and construction personnel, and
assist the M CC as necessary in preparing status reports.
The primary role of the Environmental Specialists is to provide expertise when
environmentally sensitive issues occur throughout the development phases of project
implementation and to provide direction for mitigation.
010571000
3
/1//1 ~;2t/ 5
-
-
Pro\1TIlffi Procedural Guidelines
...
Prior to any construction activities, meetings should take place between all the parties
involved to initiate the monitoring program and establish the responsibility and authority of
the participants. Mitigation measures which need to be defined in greater detail will be
addressed prior to any project plan approvals in follow-up meetings designed to discuss
specific monitoring effects.
...
...
...
An effective reporting system must be established prior to any monitoring efforts. All
parties involved must have a clear understanding of the mitigation measures as adopted and
these mitigations must be distributed to the participants of the monitoring effort Those that
would have a complete list of all the mitigation measure adopted by the City of Chula Vista
would include the City of Chula Vista, the City of San Diego, GTC Boathouse developer,
the MCC and the construction crew supervisor. The MCC would distribute to each
Environmental Specialist and Environmental Monitor a specific list of mitigation measures
that pertain to his or her monitoring tasks and the appropriate time frame that these
mitigations are anticipated to be implemented. In addition to the list of mitigations, the
monitors will have mitigation monitoring report (MMR) forms with each mitigation written
out on the top of the form. Below the stated mitigation measure, the form will have a series
of questions addressing the effectiveness of the mitigation measure. The monitors shall
complete the MMR and fIle it with the MCC following their monitoring activity. The MCC
will then include the conclusions of the MMR into an interim and final comprehensive
construction report to be submitted to the City of Chula Vista. This report will describe the
major accomplishments of the monitoring program, summarize problems encountered in
achieving the goals of the program, evaluate solutions developed to overcome problems
and provide a list of recommendations for future monitoring programs. In addition and if
appropriate, each EM, and/or ES will be required to fill out and submit a daily log report to
the MCC. The daily log report will be used to record and account for the monitoring
activities of the monitor. Weekly/monthly status reports, as determined appropriate, will be
generated from the daily logs and compliance reports and will include supplemental material
(Le., memoranda, telephone logs, letters). This type of feedback is essential for the City of
Chula Vista to conform the implementation and effectiveness of the mitigation measures
imposed on the project.
-
...
....
..
-
...
....
..
...
...
....
-
4
It/A ~ ) Lj b 010571000
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Actions in Case of Non-coITlPliance
There are generally three separate categories of non-compliance associated with the adopted
conilitionsofapprov~:
. Non-compliance requiring an immeiliate halt to a specific task or piece of
equipment
. Infraction that initiates an immeiliate corrective action. No work or task delay.
. Infraction that does not warrant immeiliate corrective action and results in no
work or task delay.
In ill three cases, the MCC would notify the OTC contractor and the City of Chula Vista,
and an MMR would be fIled with the MCC on a daily basis.
There are a number of options the City of Chula Vista may use to enforce this Program
should non-compliance continue. Some methods commonly used by other lead agencies
include "stop work" orders; fines and pen~ties (civil); restitution; permit revocations;
citations; and injunctions. It is essenti~ that ill parties involved in the Program understand
the authority and responsibility of the onsite monitors. Decisions regarding actions in case
of non-compliance are the responsibility of the City of Chula Vista.
The following text includes a summary of the project impacts, and a list of ill the associated
mitigation measures with the monitoring efforts necessary to ensure that the measures are
properly implemented incorporated into the measures. All the mitigation measures
identified in the SEIR are anticipated to be translated into conilitions of project approv~. In
adilition, once the project has been approved and prior to its implementation, the mitigation
measures sh~l be further detailed.
SUMMARY OF PROJECT IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES
The following text includes a summary of the project impacts, a list of ill the associated
mitigation measures and the monitoring efforts necessary to ensure that the measures are
properly implemented. All the mitigation measures identified in the SEIR are recommended
to be translated into conditions of project approv~ and are stated herein in language
appropriate for such conilitions. In adilition, once the Boathouse facility project has been
approved and during various stages of implementation, the mitigation measures sh~l be
010571000
5
/ if fl / }J/7
-
....
further detailed by the designated monitors, City of Chula Vista, City of San Diego and the
applicant
-
Recreational Use Compatibility/Operations
-
Summary of Ill1Pacl~
..
Potentially significant land use impacts involve project inconsistency with the existing Otay
Lake recreational uses. This potential operational incompatibility impact is due to the
locations of the two respective facilities, their differing activities and the nature of the
proposed OTC boat courses. The proposed OTC Boathouse would operate the OTC
canoes, kayaks and sculls in the recreational boats' commonly used paths to fishing
locations and/or recreational spots across the lake.
...
...
...
Mitil!ation Measures
...
I. During fishing season days (Wednesday, Saturday and Sunday, mid-January
through mid-October), OTC boats will not have exclusive rights to use of the OTC
time trials course of up to eight lanes (identified in Figure 2-7 of the SEIR). The
OTC boats will have exclusive use of the OTC training course (three lanes) on those
days. This rule shall be included in the Facilities Management Plan (FMP).
Further, this rule shall be monitored and its effectiveness included in the Quarterly
Management Reports (QMRs) required below.
...
..
...
2. Boat course crossings: In the event motorized fishing boats warrant crossing the
path of a rowing scull/boat underway, the crossing shall occur either in back of
(after) the rowers, or a minimum of 500 meters in front of the rowers. Because the
rowers go "backwards" and are more difficult to turn, this should avoid crossing
conflicts. This regulation should be posted at the City boat launch facility and
communicated to the public as recommended below under "Public Education"
Measure #8.
-
...
\
~
-
3. Fishing tournaments: OTC training activities shall either be prohibited or restricted
on permitted fishing tournament days (occasional Saturdays during fishing season;
permitted through the City of San Diego WUD). This regulation shall be
specifically addressed in the Facilities Management Plan to the satisfaction of the
""
...
4\
Jt/IJ / )t/~
010571000
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I.
I
I
City WUD, and should be monitored and included in the Quarterly Management
Reports to determine if adjustments become necessary. The OTC shaU be notified
of dates of permitted fishing tournaments no later than two months prior to the
tournament date.
4. During the fishing season on Lower Otay Reservoir (approximately mid-January
through mid-October), sheUs, canoes and kayaks will be required to restrict
activities on the three days per week when fishing is aUowed (Wednesday,
Saturday, and Sunday). The OTC boats will remain 150 feet from the Reservoir
shoreline on aU fishing days, except in the area delineated in Figure 3-4 of the
SEIR, in order to avoid conflict with shoreline fishing activities. The feasibility of
the 150-buffer shaU be monitored in conjunction with lake-level monitoring
(Measure #9 below).
Waterfowl Huntinl! Considerations:
5. During the months of the waterfowl hunting season (approximately mid-October
through mid-January) rowing and paddling will be prohibited during the hunting
hours of dawn to noon on the two days per week that hunting is allowed at Lower
Otay Reservoir (Wednesday and Saturday). In addition, at all times during this
season - in order to provide continuous resting area for waterfowl - sheUs, canoes,
and kayaks will be restricted from activity in the Harvey Arm of the Reservoir.
Other Measures:
6. Special events: No special events/competitions of over 100 people shall be allowed
at the OTC boathouse or lake under this approval. This restriction shall not include
typical training competition between OTC training athletes included in the OTC
program (provided that no more than 100 spectators attend). Said provisions shaU
be included in the Facilities Management Plan. Any future requests for
competitions shall be subject to CEQA review and review by the Cities of Chula
Vista and San Diego.
7. Athletes and OTC employee education: During orientation of athletes and
employees to the boathouse, the lake's public uses and schedules shall be fuUy
described. Lake rules and regulations and public use schedules shall be posted in
010571000
7
) 1/1) "dL/9
-
-
written form at the boathouse, and shall be included in the overall training program
of the athletes. Said provisions shall be included in the Facilities Management Plan,
and adherence to rules should be monitored in the Quarterly Management Reports.
..
...
8. Public education: In order to educate the public of the OTC lake activities and thus
minimize use conflicts, the following items are recommended. These items should
be in place prior to OTC boathouse occupancy, and should be monitored in the
Quarterly Management Reports.
...
-.
. An information sign at the lake turn-off at Wueste Road/Otay Lakes Road shall
be posted, identifying the OTC facilities and a radio channel from which lake
use information can be derived.
...
...
. The radio channel shall inform listeners of the OTC activities (i.e., training
times, rules of the lake), public use information (i.e., open days, tournaments,
lake conditions), ecological sensitivity of the area and associated protection
rules, and lake use rules which must be reviewed prior to boat launching or
ticket purchase. If this mitigation measure is pursued, funding for the radio
station will be determined at a later date.
...
...
...
. At the City boat launch, prior to purchase of tickets or boat launching, the lake
user should be required to read and acknowledge the rules of the lake. It is
recommended that this will be the responsibility of the City of San Diego WUD.
...
9. Lake levels: Lake level data shall be included in each Quarterly Management Report
(derived from the City WUD), to provide for ongoing monitoring of the lake
surface area available for use. Should lake levels show signs of continued decline,
the matter should be raised with the Users' Council and OTC, to determine potential
refmements to lake use regulations. This monitoring and potential resulting actions
should guarantee equitable shared use of the lake. Lake fluctuations and potential
adjustments in OTC training areas should be identified in the Facilities Management
Plan, acknowledging that the lake is for both public and OTC uses.
...
,
...
..
-
10. Navy Rescue Training: the USOC/OTC shall meet with the Navy to determine an
equitable shared use of the lake. It may be that notification by the Navy to the OTC
of future days and locations of practice rescue will be adequate to reduce potential
~
...
8
JLlll' ).511 010571000
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
conflict. This agreement shall be included in the Facilities Management Plan prior
to issuance of building permits. The effectiveness of the agreement shall be
included in the Quarterly Management Reports, as necessary.
11. Facility Management Plan (FMP): Prior to the issuance of building permits, the
FMP shall be revised to include the above mitigation items. In addition, the
following items are recommended to be added to the FMP:
. Dock operations and OTC boat launching operations should be described.
Provisions to minimize impacts to the surrounding ecology (especially while
launching) should be specified in the operations plan.
. OTC motor boats (coach launches) should be quantified (estimated no more
than 4 boats). Provisions for launching (at the City launch site); storage (at
OTC docks, and when to be out of the lake); fueling and repair should be
delineated in the FMP. Fueling shall be conducted using the "pop-on/off'
tanks, which would be stored at the OTC main site and brought to the
boathouse when necessary. Only minor repairs should be conducted at the
boathouse.
. Athletes, employees and visitors shall be educated regarding the lake rules and,
importantly, the sensitivity of the adjacent ecology of the area. Parking shall be
by permit only, and to load/off-load boats. Signs shall further be posted,
subject to the review of the City of Chula Vista, at locations along the lake (to
be determined), to provide for public education and protection of sensitive
habitat. Maps shall be posted at the OTC site which identify protected and/or
prohibited areas. Walkways and trails shall be clearly marked (refer also to
Biology mitigation, Section 3.6).
. The OTC shall notify the City of San Diego WUD of any OTC event requiring
exclusive use of the course two months prior to the event.
Monitorinl1
Monitoring for the above mitigation measures will be in the form of Quarterly Management
Reports (QMRs). The USOC/OTC shall be responsible for preparation of the QMRs.
010571000
9
/ t/ II <2.5/
-
-
Information to be recorded includes but is not limited to: daily use of the boathouse facility
including number and types of boats used and schedules, any boat crossing conflicts,
number of athletes each day, visitors, etc. The USOC/OTC, City WUD, and Lakes
Committee or User's Council shall work together to develop the scope, format, schedule
and review/comment system of the QMRs. These three entities shall comprise the QMR
"review committee."
..
-
...
Items included in the mitigation measures above shall also be incorporated into the QMR
system. Future additional desired lake uses which may be requested should also be
considered by the review committee and reported in the QMRs.
-
-
Further, to obtain input as to the effectiveness of ongoing lake operations, comment forms
shall be provided to the OTC coaches, athletes and site manager, and to the City of San
Diego boat launch facility for input from the public (forms could be provided at the time of
ticket purchase, and filled out as desired by lake users). The results of these comment
forms shall be incorporated into each QMR and reviewed/considered by the three reviewing
entities, or review committee (OTC, City of San Diego and User's Council).
..
-
...
The Facilities Management Plan (FMP) discussed under Mitigation Measure #11 shall be
reviewed by the City of San Diego and Chula Vista prior to the issuance of building
permits.
...
Aesthetics/Visual Resources
..
Sul11111alY of Impact~
..
.
The proposed OTC Boathouse facility development would change the appearance of the
project site which is primarily characterized as recreational and natural open space adjacent
to the Lower Otay Lake. Given the natural aesthetics of the lake environment, any
development in the immediate area would constitute a potential significant impact on its
rural character and visual quality. The Boathouse structure could potentially impact public
views from Wueste Road to Lower Otay Lake. The project specific impact is partially
mitigated by project design and landscaping.
...
..
..
.'"
~
10
Jill ~)fJ-
010571000
""
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Miti~ation Measures
12. As a condition of project (CUP) approval, the boathouse structure shall be
redesigned to a lesser height. Said design plans reflecting the lower structure shall
be submitted for review and approval by the City of Chula Vista as a part of the
City Design Review process, prior to issuance of grading permits. Further, the
City of San Diego shall be invited to review and comment on the revised design
plans, prior to approval of the project's City of San Diego lease permit.
13. Final Landscape Plans for the project, including revegetation areas, shall
incorporate species of a type and size (especially height) acceptable to the City of
Chula Vista Landscape Architect and City Planning Department. Further, the City
shall provide the City of San Diego the opportunity to review and comment on the
plans prior to final approval by the City of Chula Vista, facilitating the blending of
the project's landscaping with nearby City of San Diego recreational areas.
Monitorin~
Design plans for the boathouse structure will require the review and approval by the City of
Chula Vista prior to issuance of grading permits. Revised design plans will also be subject
to review by the City of San Diego, prior to approval of the project's City of San Diego
lease permit.
The City of Chula Vista Landscape Architect and the City of San Diego will review the final
landscape plans. The USOC, or other entity acceptable to the City, shall be responsible for
the monitoring of health and growth of the site's landscaped areas and revegetation areas
for a period acceptable to the project biologist. This monitoring is required to ensure the
survival of native species and revegetation areas. An environmental specialist in
coordination with the project biologist will be responsible for ensuring that mitigation is
properly implemented at both the preconstruction and site preparation phases.
010571000
11
1t/;1~ ;-5;
-
-
Geology/Soils
...
Summarv of Inwacts
-
Geologic constraints on site include inundation by seiche, soil expansion and settlement,
and seismicity. These conditions and potential impacts can be mitigated to a level of
insignificance by mitigation measures proposed herein, including subsequent site specific
earthwork analysis, sensitive grading and standard grading/site preparation procedures.
III!l,
...
Mitij!ation Measures
-
The following mitigation measures will reduce geologic impacts on the project site to below
a level of significance. These mitigations specifically address possible lithologic and
seismic impacts.
..
14. Clayey expansive portions of the Sweetwater Formation will be excluded from the
upper three feet of subgrade to reduce the potential for damaged foundations (lCG
Inc. 1990).
-
..
15. Buildings and structures designed as specified by the Uniform Building Code in
regards to the possible earthquake intensities will minimize the potential for
damage. Stucco walls and C-type masonry should be avoided if possible.
...
..
16. Problems due to expansive soils will be compensated by selective grading and
specially designed foundations as set forth in the Uniform Building Code.
-
17. Erosional rates will be minimized through erosional control measures such as
maintaining vegetative cover and vegetated buffer zones.
...
-
Monitorin~
A qualified geologist/environmental specialist shall be responsible for monitoring the
implementation of these mitigation measures. In addition, the geologist/environmental
specialist shall be onsite throughout the entire grading phase of the project to ensuring
proper implementation and to be available to make decisions on issues not originally
anticipated.
-
...
...
12
F/ /j - J, 5'-/
010571000
...
I
'I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Hydrology/Water Quality
SummlllY of Il11Pact~
Project development will increase runoff onto sensitive areas such as the Gtay Reservoir,
resulting in a potential impact on the potable water supply of the Otay Reservoir. Grading
and utility plans for the proposed Boathouse facility include provisions for a drainage
system that will divert runoff to a "soak away basin" where storm water will be.fIltered to
remove particulate matter and dissolved chemicals prior to discharge into Gtay Reservoir
(proposed as mitigation). Potential water quality impacts would result from the discharge
of urban runoff contaminants from parking lots, drives and other surfaces into the Gtay
Lakes Reservoir.
Miti~ation Measures
18. Specific project plans will be subject to review and approval of the City of Chula
Vista in cooperation with the City of San Diego.
19. A preliminary grading and utility plan was included as part of the Soakaway Basin
Conceptual Design Report. Final design plan submittals shall be consistent with the
conceptual plans and approved by Cities of Chula Vista and San Diego and the
County Health Department prior to issuance of a final grading permit
20. Pad drainage shall be designed to collect and direct surface waters away from
proposed structures to approved drainage facilities. For lawn and parking areas, a
minimum gradient of two percent shall be maintained and drainage shall be directed
toward approved swales or drainage facilities. Drainage patterns approved at the
time of final grading should be maintained throughout the life of proposed
structures.
Runoff from roof and concrete deck surfaces shall be diverted to the soakaway
basin as described in Surface Drainage Impacts and the Soakaway Basin
Conceptual Design Report (Appendix E of the SEIR). Final improvement plans
shall be consistent with the conceptual document and approved by the Cities of
Chula Vista and San Diego and the County Health Department prior to issuance of a
010571000
13
/
JlII/' J:f>
-
...
grading permit. Issuance of the grading permit shall also be contingent upon the
establishment of a maintenance agreement between the City of San Diego and the
STF/USOC for the soakaway (including provisions for soil and piping
replacement, etc.), or waiver of such agreement by the City.
..
-',
21. Erosional Control: Slopes shall be planted with appropriate drought-resistant
vegetation as recommended by a landscape architect immediately following grading.
Slopes should not be over-irrigated as heavy groundcover combined with over-
watering is a primary source of surficial slope failures. Timer-controlled irrigation
should be altered during the rainy season.
..
...
-
22. Maintenance of Drainage Devices: Graded berms, swales, area drains, and slopes
are designed to carry surface water from pad areas and shall not be blocked or
destroyed. Water will not be allowed to pond in pad areas, or over top and flow
down graded or natural slopes.
....
-
23. Erosion potential during the construction phase of the project shall be controlled
through the proper use of erosional control measures, the maintenance of vegetative
buffers and timely planning of inundation to avoid peak rainy seasons.
..
...
24. Development of the subject project and the Eastlake ill project, in general, must
comply with all applicable regulations established by the United States
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as set forth in the National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements for urban runoff and
stormwater discharge.
...
"'I
,
25. Specific project plans for surface drainage into Otay Lakes shall be subject to
review and approval by the city of Chula Vista, the RWQCB and the County Health
Department At that time, the project applicant may be required to divert all surface
runoff from the site away from the reservoir.
"""
....
26. Sources of uncontrolled water, such as leaky water pipes or drains shall be
immediately repaired if identified.
...
...
27. Erosion control devices discussed previously would significantly reduce the
sediment load in the runoff waters. Devices constructed to drain and protect slopes,
"'"
14
IrA - J.5b
010571000
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1\
I
I
including brow ditches, berms, retention basins, terrace drains (if utilized) and
down drains shall be maintained regularly, and in particular, shall not be allowed to
clog so that water can flow unchecked over slope faces.
Monitorine-
A qualified hydrologist/environmental specialist, working with the City of Chula Vista's
Engineer/Public Works Department, will ensure that the mitigation measures are effectively
implemented. It will be the responsibility of the City to ensure conformance with all
applicable City flood control, Otay Water District and State Regional Water Quality Control
Board regulations prior to issuance of grading permits.
Biological Resources
Summarv of Irnpact~
Construction of the training facilities at this site would result in impacts to Diegan coastal
sage scrub (approximately 3.0 acres) and wetland (0.1 acre) that is primarily freshwater
marsh.
Indirect impacts as a result of the construction of the facility at this site could include
erosion and sliding of materials into wetland habitats. Any movement of material into
wetland habitats would be considered a significant adverse impact. Indirect impacts to
California gnatcatchers as a result of increased human access and activity on this site is
considered potentially signjficant
Cumulative impacts include the loss of habitat and potentially occurring sensitive species
populations on a regional basis due to increased human activity on the reservoir. The
cumulative loss of Diegan coastal sage scrub and potentially occurring sensitive species is
considered a significant adverse impact
Mitie-ation Measures
28. Approximately 0.6 acre of high quality Diegan coastal sage scrub will be impacted
by grading for the road and approximately 2.4 acres of disturbed Diegan coastal
sage scrub will be impacted by construction of the boathouse. A 2:1 mitigation
010571000
15
It/;? -)f I)
-
-
ratio will be used for the high quality sage scrub (1.2 acre), and a 1:1 ratio will be
used for the disturbed sage scrub (2.4 acres). A total of 3.6 acres of Diegan
coastal sage scrub will be planted on the two southern most slopes on the west side
of the Olympic Training Center adjacent to the Salt Creek dedicated open space.
The proposed mitigation area is shown in Figure 2-3 of the SEIR. Sensitive plant
species should be used in the coastal sage scrub restoration if available. In
addition, all areas disturbed by grading around the Olympic Training Center
boathouse (including the access road) will be revegetated with coastal sage scrub.
'"'
..,
..
-
29. Since no areas exist around the lake margin to restore freshwater marsh habitat,
impacts to freshwater marsh (0.1 acre) habitat shall be mitigated out-of-kind by
planting native riparian tree species along the lake margin, outside of the freshwater
marsh fringe. It is proposed that 20 Fremont cottonwoods (Populus fremontii) be
planted at intervals around the margin of the lake.
'"'
..
30. Human access shall be reduced along the coastal sage scrub areas on the project site
with signs and barrier plantings; and, access to the coastal sage scrub mitigation
areas shall be restricted on the Olympic Training Center site.
...
""
31. The proposed mitigation areas shall be approved by City of San Diego and City of
Chula Vista staff in consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the
California Deplirtment of Fish and Game.
...
..,
32. Remedial measures such as restricting shoreline access year round shall be
implemented through signage and/or barrier plantings.
....
"
Monitorin~
~.
A specific revegetation plan must be implemented by the project applicant in coordination
with the project biologist/environmental specialist The Plan will be approved by the City
of San Diego and City of Chula Vista Planning Department prior to issuance of a grading
permit. Procedures will be monitored by a qualified biologist/environmental specialist
during the landscaping and/or site preparation phase. The boathouse manager will be
responsible for including a discussion of the timing and distance the floating dock was
moved each year in the Quarterly Management Report
...
...
...
...
16
;1/J/,)~~
010571000
'"'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Traffic and Circulation
Summary of ln1pacts
World class competitions, occurring once every several years could draw up to 2,000
spectators. These larger events may potentially result in temporary traffic congestion.
Lack of parking spaces may also occur during small events (less than 100 spectators).
Therefore, during the small and world-class events, spectators and visitors could be
transported by shuttle buses to the Boathouse site from the Olympic Training Center and
neighboring parking centers.
The proposed Boathouse project would have a minimal contribution to long term
cumulative traffic volumes, however, measures were incorporated in the OTC project to
mitigate cumulative traffic impacts to acceptable levels.
Mitil!ation Measures
33. During small events with less than 100 spectators, shuttling of people from the
OTC main campus area will be required once the OTC Boathouse parking lot,
which has 38 spaces, is full.
34. To mitigate potential traffic congestion impacts associated with large special events,
which requires restrictive use of all or a portion of Lower Otay Reservoir, the
USOC will be required to obtain a pennit from the City of San Diego Water Utilities
Department with the City of Chula Vista being advised of the same. Requests for
special events will be made through the City of San Diego, and will include
information on the event date and time(s), estimated number of boats to be involved
in the competition and an estimate of the number of spectators, if any, expected to
attend. The City [of San Diego Water Utilities Department] will indicate, in
approving any special event, conditions under which the event may be held,
including requirements for event notices, course marshals, traffic controls, special
event signage and potential compensation for lost revenue if applicable. The City of
San Diego has jurisdictional authority over the use of Lower Otay Lake. However,
access to Lower Otay Lakes is via Telegraph Canyon Road/Otay Lakes Road,
future Orange Avenue, and Wueste Road, which are now within, or will be within
(after annexation), the jurisdictional authority of the City of Chula Vista.
010571000
17
/14- )sr
...
....
,
Therefore, the City of Chula Vista may also require permits for special events and
may specify the conditions under which special events may be held.
...
Measures to mitigate significant cumulative related impacts from development of the eastern
territories are included in the Final EIR for the OTC Plan and the EastLake III (GDP) Final
EIR.
...
,
...
Monitorin~
...
The City of Chula Vista Engineer/Public Works Department and the City of San Diego
Water Utilities Department will be responsible for ensuring that the USOC incorporates
conditions under which special events may be held and that conditions are properly
enforced during such events. The City of San Diego Water Utilities Department and the
City of Chula Vista will monitor the first scheduled special event to evaluate the
effectiveness of the conditions established by the special event permit issued by each
department.
...
...
-
OTHER MITIGATION
..
Additional conditions of approval placed on the project by the City of Chula Vista shall be
subject to monitoring at the direction of the City.
...
...
...
...
....
...
...
...
18
J(I}-JfFV
010571000
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX C
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
triA/db!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
UNITED STATES OLYMPIC BOATHOUSE
AT LOWER OTAY RESERVOIR
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
NOVEMBER 1991
-
IrA -J t-).
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
UNITED STATES OLYMPIC BOATHOUSE
AT LOWER OTAY RESERVOIR
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
NOVEMBER 1991
/'11// )J,)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF EXHIBITS
R>REWORD
Lower Otay Reservoir/Uses
SEcnON I. ORGANIZATION
Lower Otay Lake User's Council
USOC Boathouse Programs
USOC Athletes Program
Community Access
SEcnON II. USE REGULATIONS AND RESTRlcnONS
Training and Rowing Competitions
Operating Hours
Water Use Restrictions
- Waterfowl Hunting Season
- Fishing Season
Quarterly Management Reports
Special Events
SECTION III. SITE MANAGEMENT
Building and Grounds Maintenance
Boat Fabrication
Motor Vehicle and Trailer Parking
Pump Station Maintenance
Overnight Use
Use of Area Surrounding the Boathouse
i
Page i
Page ii
Page 1
Page 3
Page 5
Page 8
fl!ffr161
A.
B.
C
D.
F.
F.
a
H.
I.
J.
K
...
-
LIST OF EXlllBITS
...
Boathouse Site Plan
...
Boathouse Elevations
Organizational Chart
Training Course
Course Mechanics
Competition Course
Fishing Season Rowing/paddling Schedule
Waterfowl Hunting Season Rowing/Paddling Schedule
Prohibited Use Area/Waterfowl Hunting Season
Rowing/Paddling Area Unaffected by 150' Constraint
Leased Premises
...
"'"
...
..
...
..
...
...
...
..
/
...
...
ii
...
...
~
1101111111. ~)\
IIlIil Ii ~ a.'" l
r\. "
'\. "~~~ ~~
" . 5
! ~i!!a
B!~ I'
!h!
ll~ I
I
+
; t'" .ll
; < I g i'~ I
L
".,. .'
,.
.:: (~-~
.ll"'f-
-. u - .' I
'.1 =-
. --) ~
1
..1'-
\
.!.. -_. -.
LW - ..I
,~,.,.. ,,,.,.
;ill;
~l !!Il. r,-fl13J <
I ' lLlJ~
~ ; !II! u:JlliJ' ~
. .... I 'I -
· .011. J:
X
w
:\,.
.
...
.0-;
. .
1*
------
I I
L::._..'
r~'
I . l
I" ..I
\,....01
+
.._..~
~i
,h
=="'..:::--===.:::::~.::--=-.:=: =:".:::.::.'=0-::::..00:.:.-..:-.:=--=...-:-..:..--::.=..-=-=.":.'='======--=-....-=--=0;:..-:
~.
" i~
Iii
+
...-..-.......-.. . ---.-
1.11 @)) III1
m
"
, '
. .
."
,.
II
l~
, J
'.".""-,
DR , II!! .[[]III~'I 00
! '!Ill u:J[U ~
. .... I 'I -
..11 I :r
><
-slI-
-'>
~,{
~
~
I
il
---nr- .
"
IE
me
WIbll
mD
mler
me
" ' me
, ' mlCl I;
i I IE
~I .EI a1
. , I
:="'..:.."';"'-==.:::..":="'.=:""....:r;-=---=-.::-.::.-.:=::::..-=--...:",:"'--=-'=""-=-~=..-=::.~'='==A----===;"-~-=--==
'.
, '.
~ . k ~ k_
, _ . _ '-__ '__ --" _ _ _ .....I' _ __ _-01 --...j --,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FOREWORD
The United States Olympic Training Center Boathouse on Lower Otay
Reservoir is one of several training venues associated with the
United States Olympic Training Center San Diego, located in the City
of Chula Vista in San Diego County. The central goal of the Olympic
Training Center is the training of American athletes representing the
United States in international competition. The primary purpose of
the Olympic Training Center Boathouse is to facilitate the training of
rowers, canoeists and kayakers competing on an international level.
The facilities may also be made available, when not in use by United
States Olympic Committee (USOC) training programs, to collegiate and
community programs (both youth and masters) on an organized pre-
approved basis, subject to the discretion of the City of San Diego and
the USOC.
The purpose of this Facilities Management Plan is to outline the
expectations of daily site management at the Olympic Boathouse, and
to establish a cooperative framework for operating the facility to
ensure the continued safety of the water as a public resource and to
promote co-existence with other recreational uses on the Reservoir.
Lower Otay Reservoir/Uses
The Olympic Boathouse is located on land owned by and leased from
the City of San Diego, adjacent to the Lower Otay Reservoir (Exhibits
A & B, Site Plan & Elevation). The USOC recognizes that Lower Otay
Reservoir is first and foremost a resource for potable water for the
citizens of the City of San Diego. The USOC recognizes that thiS
purpose supersedes any recreational or training uses at the
Reservoir, and that providing safe drinking water to the citizens of
San Diego is and must be the first priority of the San Diego City
Council and its Water Utilities Department.
The Reservoir also serves as a recreational. resource for fishermen,
water fowl hunters, windsurfers, recreational rowers, paddlers and
passive Lakeside users. While recognizing the importance of the
Reservoir as "one of the finest natural warm water fisheries in the
City lakes system," thel987 City Lakes Plan for Otay Reservoir
recommended that "opportunities should be expanded through the
development of an aquatic oriented recreation center offering rental
I
/,/1 / ,'lIP 7
..
equipment and instruction related to sailing, rowing, canoeing,
kayaking, water safety and fishing." In addition to providing an
important training venue for United States athletes - should the
demands for recreational. rowing and paddling be identified by the
City - the USOC is willing to cooperate to explore community uses at
this site which will help to meet the recommendations of the 1987
report, bringing opportunities for these quiet, "human-powered"
water sports to Lower Otay Reservoir.
..
...
...
...
The USOC recognizes existing recreational uses on Lower Otay
Reservoir and understands the need for proper management of its
facility and the need to foster a cooperative effort to maintain joint
usage among all activities. It is acknowledged that a commitment to
cooperation will be required from all of the recreational users on
Lower Ota~ to encourage harmonious relationships among the users
of the Reservoir waters and surroundings.
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
2
/'/fl~ ,2ft;2/
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SECTION I. ORGANIZATION
Lower Otay Reservoir is operated by the City of San Diego Water
Utilities Department. The City has legal authority over all operations
on the Reservoir.
The Olympic Training Center will be operated by the USOC. The
primary goal of the Olympic Training Center is to train American
athletes for international competition. Subject to the approval of the
City of San Diego and the USOC, the boathouse facilities may be made
available for collegiate training and community youth and masters
programs.
It is expected that a Boathouse Coordinator will coordinate activities
at the boathouse for the USOC. It will be the Boathouse Coordinator's
responsibility to oversee operations of the boathouse, including both
maintenance and program scheduling. This specialist will coordinate
training programs and activities for rowers and paddlers at all levels
and will interface between the USOC, the rowing and paddling
associations and any community organizations which may be
involved in instruction and/or training from the site.
. Lower Otay Lake User's Council
At the discretion of the City of San Diego, a Lower Otay Lake User's
Council will be established to deal with the interactions between the
various user groups on the Reservoir. This advisory committee
would include a representative from each of the recreational use
groups (hunting, fishing, windsurfing, rowing and canoe/kayaking)
and a representative of the City Water Utilities Department. The
advisory committee will review all requests for special events, make
recommendations to the City Lakes Committee and Water Utilities
Department on scheduling and special conditions, and provide a
forum for potential conflict resolution between user groups on a
regularly scheduled basis.
USOC Boathouse Programs
An Organization Chart outlining the relationships for boathouse
scheduling and operations is shown on Exhibit C. The following
summarizes the primary activities of the USOC programs.
3
;rJll/)&)
-
...
!
EXHIBIT C
-
USOC BOATHOUSE
ORGANIZATION CHART
...
-
S.D. City
Council
City
Deptartmen ts:
Water Utilitiesl City Lakes
Prot ertv Committee
,
USOC Lower Otay
Lake
User's Council
.
Boathouse
Coordinator
I I
USRA USCKT
Potential
Community
Users
...
...
...
...
...
-
...
...
...
-
...
...
...
) I/ /1-;) 71J
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
USOC Athletes Pro&ram
The USOC athlete program will be run by the two National Governing
Bodies representing the sports of rowing and canoe/kayaking in the
United States: the United States Rowing Association (US Rowing) and
the United States CanoelKayak Team (USCKT). Athletes preparing for
international competition require year-round training, and are
expected to be on the Reservoir almost every day of the year.
Canoe/kayakers train in individual boats, rowers train in shells of
one, two, four or eight people (plus a coxswain in the eight and some
four shells). Primary training hours are early morning (5 - 10:30
am) and late afternoon (3-8 pm).
Community Access
The USOC has a general policy that provides for potential community
use of training facilities if and when they are not in full use by
USOC/National Governing Bodies programs. If the City of San Diego
expresses an interest, the USOC is willing to work with the City to
explore providing community use at the boathouse at the discretion
of both the City and the USOC. This may include limited collegiate
training and organized local youth and masters programs.
4
Jtjfl')7(
..
SECTION II. USE REGULATIONS AND RESTRICTIONS
..
Training and Rowing Competitions
..
The USOC will operate a training course to be located in the main
body of Lower Otay Reservoir (Exhibit D, Training Course).
International rowing competition requires a 2000-meter straight-
line course, and paddlers must have a minimum 1000-meter course
for training and competition.
..
..
The USOC course on Lower Otay is 2000-meters in length, beginning
approximately 600 feet north of the inlet structure and ending
westerly of North Point. The course, which will be shared by rowers
and paddlers, consists of a series of buoys in a double line, spaced
approximately 100 meters apart.
..
..,
Exhibit E illustrates the mechanics of the course, which consists of a
series of cable lines which, when not in use, rest on the bottom of the
Reservoir. When the course is in place, the lines are brought to
approximately 6-10 feet below the surface by hooking a series of
buoys which float to the top and serve as markers for the course.
..
...
...
The training course will be in place all year, being dropped to the
bottom of the Reservoir when necessary, ie: due to special events
being held by other recreational users. When rowing or canoe/kayak
competitions are held at the Reservoir, up to six additional cables will
be raised and additional buoys will be attached, spaced
approximatelY 12 meters apart (Exhibit F, Competition Course).
...
..
Operating Hours
...
The usoe Boathouse will be available for operation 364 days/year.
Exhibits G & H provide seasonal charts of projected hours of use and
anticipated boat activity (number of boats expected to be on the
water) for usoe programs. *
..
...
*Note: These numbers are estimates only and may vary depending
on types of boats being used for training (shells - singles, pairs, fours,
eights - and/or canoes/kayaks).
..
..
5
Jt!ff-)1)
..
. ..~-.....' ~ ': ';' , ~ 0" '. ',. ..,' I.' . I ,
""" '1:'"
'.!'" . ...,;...
'C
':
S
L
E
:.i -
.,
~!
"I'
i':
,
"
~
~..
)
!
.
;"
f:'
I; "
(! ~"
P1 l~' ,
.,
,.
f'
l.
:~,.
"
~~
'.
, "
\
1
[.
~
[
i
,
. ,j
;v.lll"ll~""'~)In~1I \1';1 ~m'.""!...U1...-;"r-'\'l1' . ":'l~' . .1'1" .. "',' "j'l' ". .r.,,..;t.. it'] f ""1'"1" ,,,.,..~,, 'j" .',.. t'
',=~ilr~'~W;il'l ';:';;'/;rn; ... :
Sl'::r:...:..,...-'....:.. :
~\;.c.~\.,f..'~..i/"';,.r .,(....
~~ rf~}~;I~:~~::;;~?~\~~.~;:..;. i".
~'~Ii".,.,'y......
~ t;~~~1~1;~lr~f~.,i< .' .,'
~~'''',,'''',~,~\~-' '.",
; ~~~~~~~;"~~;. :~;.;j~'..~' . "
, ~~~~.~~,jl,::'"...."j;".;.'I.r;f~,i., ..,~" .' ..... .,. -,t.,_. .. J.'
,'. ;,r;,:~;~\~~~~~;:::1~J.:~'I!';:':.~. .
~ !/I:i!';;'<'~I'" .:;~,;;'.
~t J!:'~::,.::.' :.' " ".
~: . '1\"-';~ ~I\ ~ . ,
~ ft~;;'.,a'iy-.:' L.
~~ ;i\'~~t:,II;:..,.,.1
~..: '~IU~:!" :~~OJlhf,"" ';:' .
V ~. ill:ti.~.~t.:\ '.1
~ . 'Ir~~~;;?:~'41 ~:.~t~a-,~i:!::. ~'. .:. .
,~ I ~'~~:;:::P.J.~" ~ "'~. .~ ,4 ~., . I 'Ii' '. ,,~
~. ~'~"~'~~OI~,?~~.~:r:b.(:".":~"":'
I:i' :1':~li1r~'I'l"1.;,!'::''1.J~. <\14 ,.' .
,C; ',,~"'> .~~,~'';,j,~I,~,'~:-;h:P,''t~~''i:t;...,:,
:;l . ~~,.j..'~"'~' ..~. \0' ~(' .....,... ,~
,~ 1,#i!l'Jll.~~~."..:.., '/;"'," j, 'I'~'~IO\;~,,~ ," .
I ~~":i\"'''''-ir.''''''1' 'H., t., .. ..
t, ~f::j .i?!{~i':;~l .~::~)'.~::.~. ','::"'1;, '.~' , .
P;:o R~"'.h I'~',,(~,,, ;'~ ,t: . " ,"'.
I' fll""l ~',~'tJ' t.~. 'j. 'I' ~., ~ H, ..~'
. ~! '!1~"'1 ':' . " :__~, . ....,...( . ,
i' ~t.'~~;':i'~I:~':"~"1 ',.".,"",11 .",.". I.~.\ '
I; ~))\~h";"'::l". 7-'.: ~ ~.~ .<::.'...~.~e... , i- 1~.' ,
~4 .;""~".~~,.~...i::\:'i{~l~~,.'.. \ :. '.' r ~,,~, f
~~:..j(.'::.~1:~i~,:,.j.'.-.;.' ". . ;,'~~.
~t .~lf'i"-.~t ~~~~\;:;:::~.";~}1\':~',,~.. . :'.:1. '~- ~'!~"A(..
"', ~.f"~'. '11""":"""'~'"'''' .."Jl:.' "."1'"
1\'1"j1:"""'C4~'/.""~"_"""If'..:I,....... . '~"~f'"
r wJ;{F.~?t~~~\~~::;~..:.~\:~.:.;.....? .':' -r . {j.i'P
to;'>: t.,~,.,..", ., \~. ~.' . . f I
.:~"~'f.li";~::~:'~' \::', .... '. I" .~. :: F
,:t"-e!;~'b:\,~t::.;:. I ;..; 1/,.
0' ;.l:'~t'!)'tti ~:' ,t..:: .. I '.,
" 'J't'I;j.. '.".
b.' ~li,~~)t:.~..~,~. .:. I
r ':. .~:t:{)~; <'~:::':, '. '.
f" ,~' ~"",...~,.....,.. ..'
~.. ;~~t.~r...i.~ ...~-i:.t :.'. "'<"""'.
." ",t; ij '..~'l~.....'.,. '1..-..
~~:! I~)..:.:.~.:.:~;q::;-.;>'.~:{;:..:. ' '.
T; ~{!.~~~!\~l;(:.::::l:~;?:.;. ,.... ,....
~ t''''''~~' .~....'~t"l .JI"f --" .: . .
~1'lfF'"
~,l' -~~ !\t......., "t:.;1.!~~..,;.
~ ::~:;,u;.:.,~:' ., .'
&i ;l~~E} ~..:: ~,~.
N.f.~~:,;.;::J
~:: ~':,;.:.. '..' . I
i!;~i~ii.i::,:;,:I\. ,,'.;1
i,j .~~;r"'I""" , ,,",. ' !
Iltl'~.I~~~.,\..'.Cfl, r. . J
"'1~\~;' .," ..'.' ';",' ',"::' , . .~
f;. ~:.~~~.\~'~'i"~.~~~~~I.~.,Atl/m..'t.n; ~r.:lflt.~=-It.".!.IIr.:.!.r:.l=r.!.'f;I:':::'I.1:'1;tr.tr&:ntUL=~.,~'~=-':w:-~I2o'l.":a::c;:.I:'.r-====:======'::::"-~_. _101.": , 'j'
~~t~l;t!4t~.~I1!:i...~.,. ":: ~..,' .:\ "':.',.,' :..I.*~',.:,.. . ,..:. ,:;.~..'~..'.'.:~).lt.J':,I.!..,~ . '., .1" '!",,"t: ":: ...... ' ". -. . ".' , ,". , '.1"
",''':.:'/t~,'..~~'' '~~,~."'~.;;, :::';:\~:;';l w
I~:: ..1 !II~I (i''{"''ll., ~
I~ . ~ ,..! I '. ,) . 'I!:!;;
tII,...... ,:r
'X
W
";'"
It
~ : ..
'..~
.':{..,.'.,
(>J.'
~,:
. ,.
'''-'
,'>.' .
.~l.
....:.;. .
<,~
';,.,~.~;.:,~':!:";r'?:
.,;".t\::(;'/~~i;,:
.,""';;f;t:t.
'.~, ;
-'
,",
);~.:~,
.'".
.... l
:.;
", "
":,1.
,
..,
"
!I
1
.~
'\".
h.
Ii
.~
I
~
'1
I
I
;'.'
I.'.
: ',~
. ,'\/'
......
'I ,,:f~.. ';'
~.
.....
i
, 'j'
..
I
I
.,
I
I
,J
i
:1
1
:\
:i
!
.'
.'
!
.:',
"
;..'
I
I
:,.
~
,
-
!;
~
"--
'--
L.-
-
-
-
-"
-
--
-- -
-~
rl~'D~~))i,!r__~; -
.. ~..~-
.~~
...... ~~
. !IJ!~~;.': .' . . iW~'
--I
-=-r..."....n~l
! 1 1111 lLUWEJ I
it i ml~fJ1~
~i I .~~.
i
~
--.,......
Ii.
1,..
; ,
-;!-- -,<
j' '-,
'..
~
!
i
,.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I-
I
I
I
EXHIBIT G
fJSHING SEASON - ROWINGIPADDT .ING SCHEnTTT .R
(Mid-January through Mid-October)
UON "",,'l WED 1m, 'lAT 'l'TN
Sam
6am
7am 15 15 15 15 15 15 15
8am
9am
.n __
11 am
12 pm .
1 pm
2 pm
3 pm
4pm 25 2S 2S 2S 25 2S 2S
Spm
6 pm
7 pm
30 30 30 30 30 30 30
8pm
9pm
.
These. numbers are estimates only and may vary depending on types of boats being
used for training.
JL( f/ r:J. 7~
EXHIBIT H
. WATERFoWL HUNTING SEASON - ROWINGIPADDLING snrnnTrr .F.
(Mid-October through Mid-January)
unN WED FRT !':AT !':UN
5 , .... , ' , , , ,
am , , " , . ,
. , , . " . ' ,
.... ,
. , -', , ,
.- .... . , . , , .
.' ,
.' . , ..
6 am . . ,... .... ,
" . ,-. " '
. ,
, , ,'. , .
~ , .... . , ,
. , , , . , ..
. , , , , " , , . ,
7 , .' , , , .
am . ',' . . . , '. . .'
, , "
15 15 - , , . 15 15 ' . . , 15
, . ,
, , , , .' "
, .. . - . . '. . ,
, , ..,1 ,
8 am .. , .',
, , , , . . ..
, ' ,
, , . , '. , ,
. , " ..
, , , , .
.. , , .' ,
, . , '. . . , .
, , ,
9 am . . , , '. , , ,
'.. . , , , .' ,
. , ,
': " . . , , . ' .
. .... .' . , , .
.. , , , , ,
1n .'" , . " ,
': '" .... '. . ,
11 am
12 pm
1 pm
2 pm
3 pm
4pm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
5 pm
6 pm
7pm 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
II nm
These numbers are estimates only and may vary depending on types of boats being
used for training.
RowinglPaddling prohibited during hunting hours.
;YIl- JJ7
-
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
1
1
I]
1
I]
IJ
I]
I]
I]
11
I
1
I
I]
IJ
IJ
I]
I]
I]
Water Use Restrictions
Special restrictions will limit rowing and paddling activities during
hunting and fishing seasons.
Waterfowl Huntine Season
During the months of the waterfowl hunting season (approximately
mid-October through mid-January) rowing and paddling will be
prohibited during the hunting hours of dawn to noon on the two days
per week that hunting is allowed at Lower Otay Reservoir
(Wednesday and Saturday). In .addition, during this season - in
order to provide continuous resting area for waterfowl - shells,
canoes and kayaks will be restricted from activity in the Harvey Arm
of the Reservoir (Exhibit I, Prohibited Use Area/Waterfowl Hunting
Season).
Fishine Season
During the fishing season on Lower Otay Reservoir (approximately
mid-January through mid-October), shells, canoes and kayaks will be
required to restrict activities on the three days per week when
fishing is allowed (Wednesday, Saturday, and Sunday) to remain a
minimum distance of at least 150 feet from the Reservoir shoreline,
except directly around the training course, as shown on Exhibit J.
Quarterly Management Reports
The USOC will be responsible for recording daily use of the boathouse
facility, including the number of boats launched from the facility.
The USOC will work with the City of San Diego Water Utilities
Department to develop the format and information to be included in
quarterly reports, which will be provided to the Department for their
use in planning and evaluation of recreational and training uses on
Lower Otay Reservoir.
6
p!/J--- J 7;{
..
..
Special Events
..
Any USOC approved competition to be held on Lower Otay will be
considered a "special event". Most events will involve limited
participation, such as time-trials for a regional team, and will not
draw spectators. Other, more infrequent competition (an estimated
two to six events annually), will involve visiting teams form other
regions of the United States or from other Countries. These
competitions, which could potentially draw from 50-200 spectators,
may require restrictive use of a portion of the Reservoir or, more
infrequently, exclusive use of Lower Otay. World class competitions,
which will require exclusive use of the Reservoir and may be
expected to involve more spectators (up to 2000), necessitating
special shuttle/parking arrangements, are likely to occur on Lower
Otay only once every several years.
..
..
...
...
..
Any special event which will require restrictive use of all or a
portion of Lower Otay Reservoir will require approval from the City
of San Diego Water Utilities Department. Requests for special events
will be made through the Department and the Lower Otay Lake
User's Council, and will include information on the event date and
time(s), estimated number of boats to be involved in the competition
and an estimate of the number of spectators, if any, expected to
attend. The city will indicate, in approving any special event,
conditions under which the event may be held, including
requirements for event notices, course marshalls, special event
sign age and potential compensation for lost revenue if applicable.
...
...
..
...
..
..
..
..
..
...
7
Jill')7~
..
..-.
., (
".----".
,
'-
~
~:~::,; . ,- :.
~;.iJ,,;":-.:,:,'i,.~t;,:'..:...:;,..',.
..'1
......'
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SECTION III. SITE MANAGEMENT
The USOC will be responsible for maintenance of the boathouse and
leased premises. The following provide general site management
and maintenance guidelines.
Building and Grounds Maintenance
The Olympic Training Center Boathouse and surrounding landscaped
area, as shown on Exhibit K, Leased Premises, will be maintained in
good condition by the USOC. The USOC will keep the facilities in safe
and clean condition, free of litter and safety hazards on a daily basis,
and undertake all necessary repairs and regular maintenance
responsibilities associated with the building and site. All
maintenance activities, including the use of cleansers, fuels, irrigation
equipment and supplies, pesticides and fertilizers will comply with
all State Hazardous Materials (Hazmat) regulations.
Boat Fabrication
No new boat fabrication will occur on-site. Repairs to existing boats
and equipment are permitted. All cleaning and repair activity must
take .place within the area of the boathouse building and deck which
drain into the soakaway.
Motor Vehicle and Trailer Parking
The Olympic Training Center will maintain a IDlD1mUm of 38 parking
spaces in the area designated as "parking" on Exhibit A, Site Plan.
Parking will be limited to the designated parking area.
Pump Station Maintenance
The USOC will enter into an agreement with the City of Chula Vista
for the maintenance of the pump station located at the boathouse.'
The pump station will be designed with adequate redundancy and
emergency storage, pursuant to requirements of the City of San
Diego.
8
I t(/!/ .2 ~ J.,
...
..
...
Overnight Use
There will be no overnight accommodations provided within the
boathouse facility or grounds.
...
...
Use of Area Surrounding the Boathouse
....
Nothing in this plan shall impair the right of members of the general
public to use any area surrounding the boathouse, other than the
leased premises (shown on Exhibit K) for recreational or other
purposes as permitted by the City of San Diego.
...
-
-
,
...
-
...
-
-
...
-
...
...
9
...
--
.qllll -- J~illllllll'
""<Q
~~)}
~~! l '
1I1111i Iii t, i I.
I I
.
V V V V I
~ ;; ~ OJ II
~ II CJ
~ ! 1 u
a
(;
~ <I
i C\
C\
0
;/. .-1 I U
CI
u
'E
. t;tl. '.UH,j,.;.;.!.'...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX D
MONTHLY BREAKDOWN OF BOATING TICKETS
ON OTAY RESERVOIR
)t/Il r J.sV
I]
~
I]
I]
I]
I]
I]
I]
I}
I]
I,
~
II
II
I
I
I
I
I
July 300 228 396 I 924 I
I 909 I
I Aug 243 225 441
Sept ! 205 131 481 8171
I
Oct I 90 57 189 336 I
Nov 0 0 0 ~I
Dee I 0 0 0
, June 220 160 290 I 6701
, 454 I I
July 264 240 958 1
, 4531 ,
i Aug 216 183 852 I
! Sept 157 153 394 7041
I
I Oct 0 0 0 0
I Nov 0 0 0 0
i Dec , 0 0 0 0
19901 Jan 1781 37 3881 603 I
Feb 462 98 887\ 1.447
Mar 5091 115 7151 1,339
I Apr 323 188 511 1,022
May 241 193 3691 803 I
: 686 I
, June 173 173 340 \
! July 245 229 360 834 I
, Aug 220 I 156 371 747 I
I
! Sept 191 I 153 402 746
I
I
I Oct 37 25 55 117
Nov ~I 0 0 0
,
Dec 0 01 0
Lower Olay ReservOir
Monthly Boating Tickets. 1987-1991
/ear
Month
Full Day
Boat Rental
210 I
493 I
513 t
507 '
405 I
294 I
292 I
315 i
270 i
01
~I
299 I
736 i
773 I
490 I
335 t
266 I
Half Day
Boat Rental
27 I
109
142
191
250
193 !
2451
2131
198
01
,
01
01
461
182 I
199 I
1931
210 I
1751
Private
Boats
522 '
1,021 !
967 :
604 !
404 I
3381
697 I
738
504
o
o
o
748
1,701 i
, .302 t
824 I
I
441 1
3431
'987
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
June
July
Aug
Sept
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
June
1988 I
1989 I
172 I
599 I
610 !
5231
I
316 I
171
,
1081
1271
243 I
195 I
377 !
1,309 i
1,067 i
7291
482 !
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
1 of 2
Total
159 ,
1.623 I
1,622 !
1.302 :
1.059 1
825 I
1.2341
1,266 I
972 i
01
01
01
1,093 !
2.619 I
2.274 I
1,507 i
986 I
784 I
566 !
2.0161
1,804 i
1.495 I
9931
IYfJ-'JB-5
...
I Lower Otay ReservOir
Monthly Boat Tickets, 1987-1991 -
I 2 of 2
.I~ar Month Full Day Half Day Private Total
Boat Rental Boat Rental Boats i -
I '991 Jan O! 01 01 01
,
Feb 482 I 107 : 1,029 I 1,618 I
Mar 362 ! 138 ~ 519 I 1,019 ! ...
I Apr 361 218 i 4901 1,0691
,
May 407 231 484 I 1,122,
I June 505 279 I 444\ 1.2281 ...
July 409 266 431 I 1,106
Aug 322 213 288 I 823
I Sept 347 196 476 i 1,019 -
Oct 0 0 0 0
Nov 0 0 0 0
I Dec 0 0 0 0 -
I ...
I ~
I ...
I ...
I ...
I ...
...
...
-
"'"
...
j '1A- ?'b
""\
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX E
CHRONOLOGY OF CITIZEN MEETINGS
I
I
!(4...i~?
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
I
I
I
I
SAN DIEGO NATIONAL SPORTS 1RAINING FOUNDATION
CONTACfS wrm SAN DIEGO CITY LAKES COMMlTI'EE
AND
FISHING & HUNTING REPRESENTATIVES
DATE
ATTENDEES
7/12/88
Kevin Mineo (Bass
Fisherman's Council),
Dave Nielsen
7/15/88
Bob Burgreen(Bass
Fisherman's Council),
Nielsen, Rowing
Coaches
7/20/88
San Diego
City Lakes Committee
12/30/88
Mineo, Nielsen
1/11/89
Mineo, Nielsen
3/16/90
Glen Brandenberg (Lakes
Committee), Nielsen
Mitchell
4/11/90
Mineo, Nielsen, Mitchell
McKinley
4/23/90
Mayor Greg Cox,
Geroge Hansone (Lakes,
Committee), Nielsen,
McKinley
Burgreen, Nielsen
4/25/90
5/1 5/90
6/13/90
Burgreen, Nielsen, Miller
J. Lockwood, Burgreen,
Nielsen
SUBJECT
Use of City Lakes
for OTC
Use of City Lakes
Briefing
Briefing
Boathouse Issues
Boathouse
Olympic Usage of
Otay Reservoir
Briefing
Boathouse
Olympic activities
at Otay Lakes
Fill r;) '8' f('
..
...
6/13/90
City Lakes Committee
...
8/7 /90
9/27/90
10/25/90
Burgreen, Mineo, Nielsen
Boathouse Briefing
Mineo, Burgreen, Nielsen Boathouse
...
Terry Curren (Lakes Boathouse
Committee Chair), Nielsen
....
1/9/91
City Lakes Committee
...
1/18/91
G. Brandenberg, Nielsen
Lakes Committee
Issues
-
1/23/91
Burgreen, Nielsen, Mitchell, Boathouse Issues
McKinley
...
1/23/91
Terry Curren, Nielsen
Lakes Subcommittee
...
1/30/91
G. Brandenberg, J. Brown
Nielsen
Mission Bay Rowing
Tour
...
2/20/91
Lakes aTC Boathouse
Sub-Committee
Briefing
-
2/25/91
Lakes aTC Boathouse
Sub-Committee
Briefing
...
3/19/91
Lakes aTC Boathouse
Sub-Committee
Briefing
-
3/27/91
Lakes aTC Boathouse
Sub-Committee
Briefing
...
4/15/91
Lakes aTC Boathouse
Sub-Committee
Briefing
...
....
...
...
,
...
I
I
I 5/7/91 McKinley. Brown Site Tour.
5/16/91 Lakes Sub-committee Briefing
I
6/3/91 City Lakes Committee Briefing
I 6/18/91 Brown. Varga, McKinley Briefing
I 11/18/91 Brown, McKinley Briefing
1/27/92 Burgreen, Nielsen Briefing
I 2/12/92 Lakes Committee Briefing
I 2/24/92 Lakes Committee Briefing/Discussion
I 2/26/92 Brandenberg, Nielsen Briefing
3/2192 Brown, Nielsen Briefing
I 3/1 0/92 Lakes Committee Briefing
I 3/25192 Lakes Committee Briefing
I 3/26/92 Boathouse Plans Review BriefinglDiscussion
Nielsen, Brandenberg,
rowing coaches
I 4/1/92 Brown, Nielsen Briefing
I 418/92 Brandenberg, Nielsen Briefing
I 4/8/92 Lakes Committee Briefing/Discussion
Brown, Nielsen BriefinglSite Tour
4/14/92
I
I
I
I )f/J~J-n
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX F
GEOTECHNICAL ANALYSIS
J'II? /' J, /0
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
BOATHOUSE SITE
U.S. OLYMPIC TRAINING CENTER
SAN DIEGO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
PREPARED FOR
THE SAN DIEGO NATIONAL SPORTS TRAINING FOUNDATION
1904 HOTEL CIRCLE NORTH
SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92108
PREPARED BY
ICG INCORPORATED
9240 TRADE PLACE, SUITE 100
SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92126
JANUARY 23, 1990
JOB NO. 05-8095-001-01-00
LOG NO. 0-1113
pill 'c1 '7 /
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.DI_
Inty otIIce.
J Trade Piece,
.100
Diego, CA 92126
53EH102
619/536.1306
JOrate Office:
3SQn
,e, CA 92716
951.6666
714/951-6613
1d Empire Office:
:3 Orange Tree Lane.
e240
:Iands, CA 92374
792-4222
714/798-1644
nge County Office:
~ason
,e, CA 92718
'951-8686
7141951.7969
ICG
oM incorporated
January 23, 1990
San Diego National sports
Training Foundation
1904 Hotel Circle North
San Diego, California 92108
Job No. 05-8095-001-01-00
Log No. 0-1113
Attention: Mr. Bill Miller
SUBJECT: GEOTECHNICAL INVESTIGATION
Boathouse
U.S. Olympic Training Center
San Diego County, California
Gentlemen:
As requested, we have completed our geotechnical investiga-
tion of the boathouse site. Our findings and recommendations
are presented herein.
In our opinion, the primary site conditions which are likely
to impact the proposed development include the presence of
moderately extlansive soils on the site. Recommendations
regarding these and other site conditions are provided in the
attached report.
If you have any questions after reviewing our report, please
do not hesitate to contact the undersigned at your con-
venience. This opportunity to be of professional service is
sincerely appreciated.
Very truly yours,
ICG INCORPORATED
/.~ 7 ~
~ Be~~.E.
Vice President
AFB/rm
I eotechnical SelVices. Construction Inspection and Testinq
JLI/) ~). '1 J..
I
I
I
I
I Fiaures
1
2
I 3
I ADcendices
A
B
I c
D
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(Continued)
ATTACHMENTS
Location Map
site Plan
Regional Fault Map
References
Field Exploration
Laboratory Testing Program
Standard Guidelines for Grading Projects
/114- d./ '3
,
"I
._,
~I
"I
:1
'"
Q::I
'T
I
I(DOMIHG~ESl
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
!
.,
,
.,
"
-:1 ~
1\ _ ::
~..- "'
....,.~-...."" ~
.'~ ..:--.:.~.. '1
. .;' 'Y,,':---.:~, '... "
e,-' " " ....~. II
.~ el', ~..Il
/"/f" "'I' -..
" -
1 , '\
~ - it" ~.-
1 ...../ ~ .~,U.W." ...,
I '
,,_J\:/ SAVMI~ ~ . .:-_
," '1/,. . _. 0/JIt .. ~,,~ .=-.
, \ ,.... ~:L. 'WT ._,,,.... -
~ ~l " Lo....Oe.,- ~.. _ __'~'\
~ ~: 1\ Filtr.ti~_ Plal'\'t.," '\ ~ Otay . ....\ '.. ';
I '")1 ..______~...~CampmIAlea
I
,
"
"
.'
- .'
"'~... S""l../"W"'" $05'
,;..,.......-..--
, - - -~., .--
N.t~ Ilnk.,,\;'" Raneho..del Otav
~.~<
"
/ ~jH'-:H'. Wate. ranM
~ s':r,::
....
I
I
o
"
,,)I.
9~ =42
" .
I
Fenton Ranch
"
I
-~3 ~
.- .....-
...
'"
...
I
I
.-
,
,
I
I
"
"
"
SITE
I
: TllAINING
./
, \\.1
J/
;l' .' ;;
Y',':,
,
\ .~
. . ~\
---:-'-. - - \ '1\
",-,,,~,.l
..
..
-
o
I
o
I
I
to
"
iil
..
~
I
I
tJ.
,
,
,
I
, "
I'
n
,
~.
"
; \
I
2000
FEET
4000
-
I
LOCATION MAP
:>95-001-01
JANUARY 1990
1
If/) -- :2. '7 V
I
-31
J\,;.<:
"~...
, ,
.,;:~
tlM."
- 1,,"
:''''.:'(1:
c
"
,\ "
..'
657
:'1
"
,,/ "
......"
.
,~ -'
="-1 "'.
............'
...,,~::-l-~'"
,,:,",,
"..."
" "
'111
1\ "
~.." ~~tt
\,0 .,
SITE
~SE
orA'i
S"'l.I.WA.,. ..,
.;;......,...~..
'".~.."'..-;,.~\,.~- ~~-~'-
. -
,
52:
"
"p
'~
,,:" ~
"
,
"
,,""
.'
,
,-
..----.--
A
--..
".
- ~. .a'" ~
,
.,',"~
,"
','. -
If".
,
"-.
'--
117
,/ --
/
- 750\
-
\
r
-- .......:~
;z,.- -, ".
('-'-~
",,-
.,~
ADAPTED FROM U.S.G.S. 7.5' JAMUL 1ITN.(1875)
NflJ 0'1aY MESA (11175) QUADRANGLES
FIGURE:
~
~
~
~l( ~
~
/-
.---
/-/
/-'
\
\
~
c "'
"' "'
~
c
<=>
~
o
~
,
I
c
~
c
m
~
Z z
o 0
ii ~
z 9
i I
0J
a: CJ i
w i: Sf'!
!z: ~ z~
w a: a:
Ow I-z l( 0 \:'\
::i! CJUlUlO::::; ~ 'J"
..J z:::) t-- 01( :i
"- zoa:t(o. ~ 'i
w _:1:00' \
t: gttfli~~ '\:
Ul ~oo!!l 9 '}:
S:! ,,11. > ~ ~
"- !!! :3 9
:E C ::J 0
~ Z :I: 9
O<()~
Ul o Iii
"
ow
~c
.0
~'_/
--~~~/~~
'.
\
\
\./
\ /.'y/
\. .- /.~/
.... ...-
.\ / ........:::5
_/ ~.
(...J
~
01
.~
0~
...-~
f
~
/
.----
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The San Diego National Sports
Training Foundation
January 23, 1990
Job No. .05-8095-001-01-00
Log No. 0-1-113
Page 3
3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION
The boathouse site is located on the eastern edge of the
Olympic Training Center site, on the shore of Lower otay
Reservoir. The site slopes gently eastward toward the lake.
At the time of our investigation, the only improvements
observed on the site were old dirt roads. Several mature
eucalyptus trees are growing on the site, as well as low brush.
and grasses.
4.0 SITE INVESTIGATION
4.1 General
Before starting the field work, we visited the site and
reviewed available geotechnical literature covering the
project area. The resulting information, together with
our field exploration, laboratory test results, and
previous experience in the area form the basis for our
conclusions and recommendations in this report. The
methods used for our work conform to generally accepted
standards of practice for geotechnical investigations in
southern California.
4.2 Field Exoloration
A field investigation was performed on December 20, 1989
consisting of a site reconnaissance and the drilling of
four borings. Information from the borings was used to
obtain a generalized cross-section of the subsurface
conditions in the site area. The approximate boring
locations shown on Figure 2 were located in the field by
It//} ~;4/?
The San Diego National Sports
Training Foundation
January 23, 1990
Job No. 05-8095-001-01-00
Log No. 0-1113
Page 4
pacing and reference to the few existing landmarks.
Greater accuracy of boring locations is not implied.
Borings were advanced using a truck-mounted, continuous
flight, hollow stem power auger having a diameter of
eight inches. Boring depths ranged from approximately
7 to 16.5 feet below existing grade. Samples were
obtained using a standard split tube sampler (ASTM 01586-
84), and by collecting auger cuttings as bulk samples.
Logs describing the subsurface conditions encountered are
presented in Appendix B. Lines defining the change
between soil or rock types on the boring logs were
determined by interpolation between sample locations and
are therefore approximations. The transition between
soil types may be abrupt or gradual.
4.3 Laboratorv Testinq Proqram
Laboratory tests were performed on selected samples
considered to be representative of the foundation soils.
Tests were performed in accordance with the methods of
the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) or
other accepted standards. Appendix C contains descrip-
tions of the test methods and summaries of the results.
5.0 SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS
5.1 General
The boathouse site is underlain by the Sweetwater
Formation, plus localized deposits of fanglomerates which
predate the Sweetwater. The geotechnical charac-
teristics of the bedrock as well as compacted fill to be
FI,/.J r )57
-
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
""\
...
...
..,
...
..,
...
...
...
...
..,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,-
I
The San Diego National Sports
Training Foundation
January 23, 1990
Job No. 05-8095-001-01-00
Log No. 0-1113
Page 5
derived from it were the subject of the subsurface
investigation.
5.1.1 Sweetwater Formation
The Oligocene age Sweetwater Formation unconfor-
mably overlies the Jurassic age santiago Peak
Volcanics. This contact occurs to the east of
the site, and is not exposed within the project
area.
The lithology of the Sweetwater Formation as seen
at the boathouse site consists of a yellowish gray
to brown medium dense to dense, clayey, silty,
well graded sandstone (SM,SC), with gravel. The
gravel is fine to medium in size and generally
angular in shape. This unit is occasionally
cemented and very dense, which may result in
difficult ripping.
cut surfaces in the Sweetwater Formation are
considered suitable for the support of structural
loads. The Sweetwater Formation material has good
strength characteristics when used as compacted
fill. Clayey portions are moderately expansive,
and should be excluded from the upper three feet
of subgrade where possible. The soil's expansive
potential has been considered in our foundation
recommendations.
5.1.2 Fanalomerates
Fanglomerates containing large cobbles and
boulders of weathered Santiago Peak Volcanics
/t.j/J ~,J-9~
The San Diego National Sports
Training Foundation
January 23, 1990
Job 'No. 05-8095-001-01-00
Log No. 0-1113
Page 6
apparently was responsible for refusal ex-
perienced by the drill rig in Boring 2 at 7 feet.
A number of the cobbles and boulders were observed
on the ground surface near the lake shore. Rocks
up to 12 inches in maximum dimension may be placed
in the compacted fill.
5.2 Groundwater
Groundwater was not encountered in any of the borings.
Perched groundwater may develop in the future at the
interface between the fill and the underlying bedrock
due to precipitation and irrigation.
6.0 SEJ:SMJ:CJ:TY
As with all of southern California, this site lies in a
seismically active area. There are, however, no known active
faults either on or adjacent to the site. Figure 3 shows the
known active faults in the region and their relationship to
the site. Because the active faults lie at some distance, the
seismic risk at this site is thought to be only low to
moderate in comparison with many other areas of southern
California.
Seismic hazards at the site are the result of ground shaking
caused by earthquakes on distant, active faults. Table 1
lists the known major active and potentially active faults
within a 100-kilometer radius and the estimated bedrock
accelerations resulting from the maximum probable and maximum
credible earthquakes on those faults. By definition, the
maximum probable earthquake for a given fault is the earth-
quake that has an 80 percent chance of not being exceed in 100
years. The maximum credible earthquake is the largest event
JLII1- 21 r
""
...
-!
...
...
...
..
...
...
...
...
..
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
I . :
I !
i-
I
I (OJ
-.
..
...
..
I j. "
,.
I " , .
I ..
./' III
~ a:
, ~
~ j 0 c:J
I cU ii:
~ :J~
en
I , a..
<
, :E
I I I- 0
...J ell
ell
, :::l -
I-w-- <
jl U. >
I .- a:
.!~~ ...J <0::
::l
< Z
-- ' Z <
,
!~ 0 -,
I GJ
Cl
11j w
a:
I it
VI Ii III
! , . ~
I ... i Cl
I.! I i!
, . I
I ' .1
I -+-i ~
I '
j I
I !' I ! 0 8
I i-I I
.
;
4- ..
I t ;'!
ill
".
HI
,ij
I lii
, ..
I '0 !
00
I ci
Z
lD
~ 0
..,
I Ii//! ' ~D
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The San Diego National Sports
Training Foundation
January 23, 1990
Job No. 05-8095-001-01-00
Log No. 0-1113
Page 7
considered possible under the presently known tectonic
framework.
6.1 Earthauake Effects
6.1.1 Surface Fault Ruoture
Because no active or potentially active faults
are known to cross the site, the probability of
surface fault rupture is very low.
6.1.2 Earthauake Accelerations
In our opinion, based on the information now
available, the most significant event likely to
affect this project will be an earthquake on the
Rose Canyon fault. Recent work on the Rose Canyon
fault zone has indicated that strands within the
zone are active. A single trace has been shown
to offset topsoil in one location and appears to
have created topographic features common in active
faulting (offset drainages, pressure ridges,
enclosed depressions and fault scarps). The age
of the most recent movement, the fault's recur-
rence interval (expected period between major
earthquake events), the relationship between the
active trace and other faults within the fault
zone have not yet been established.
It should be noted that the California Division
of Mines and Geology (CDMG) could establish
Alquist-Priolo Special Studies Zones along the
fault at a~y time. Upgrading the San Diego area
from seismic zone 3 to seismic zone 4 would likely
PIA / J{}.J-
The San Diego National sports ,
Training Foundation
January 23, 1990
Job No. 05-8095-001-01-00
Log No. 0-1113
Page 8
follow designation of Special studies Zones by the
state of California.
We have reviewed the existing information
available regarding the fault and conclude that
for the Rose Canyon fault, a magnitude 7.0
earthquake is an appropriate maximum credible
event for a 20 mile rupture length (offshore La
Jolla to Coronado Bridge). A maximum probable
event of magnitude 6.5 is hypothesized for the
Rose Canyon fault.
The La Nacion fault, located approximately five
miles west of the site could produce higher peak
accelerations at the site. Although this fault
has offset the Quaternary age Lindavista Forma-
tion, it has not been found to have offset
Holocene sediments, and is considered to be
potentially active. For construction engineer-
ing purposes, this fault is not considered active.
For Rose Canyon events, we ,estimate a peak bedrock
acceleration at the site of about 0.25g for a
maximum probable earthquake of magnitude 6.5. We
do not expect surface accelerations at this site
to differ significantly from the bedrock acceler-
ations.
6.1.3 Seismicallv Induced Sloce Failures
Based on the density and shear strength of the
on-site materials, seismically-induced slope
failures are not likely to occur at this site
under the design earthquake loading, provided that
/t//I - Jtl)
-
...
..
...
"'"
...
..
...
...
..
-
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
"'"
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The San Diego National Sports
Training Foundation
January 23, 1990
Job No. 05-8095-001-01-00
Log No. 0-1113
Page 9
proper grading and construction practices are
used.
6.1.4 Seismicallv Induced Settlement
Due to their high relative densities, the bedrock
and compacted fill at this site should not undergo
significant settlement as a result of seismic
shaking.
6.1.5 Liauefaction
Liquefaction is very unlikely at this site due to
the fines present in the soils, and the density
of the bedrock and proposed compacted fills.
6.1.6 Lurchina and Shallow Ground Ruoture
Shallow ground rupture should not be a hazard,
given the apparent absence of active faults in
the area. Ground cracking also should not be a
major hazard. However, it is possible that some
cracking may occur at any site during a major
earthquake.
6.1.7 Tsunamis. Seiches. and Reservoir Failures
The site is not subject to inundation by tsuna-
mis because of its elevation and its distance from
the ocean. The site could potentially be
inundated by a seiche on the Lower otay Reser-
voir.
To our knowledge, no
upslope from the site.
reservoirs are planned
}Lj/)~J!JL/
-
The San Diego National sports'
Training Foundation
January 23, 1990
Job No. 05-8095-001-01-00
Log No. 0-1113
Page 10
...
...
...
7.0 GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
...
7.1 General Discussion
No geotechnical conditions were apparent during our
investigation which would preclude the site development
as planned. The site condition which should most
severely impact the development is the presence of
moderately expansive soils.
...
...
...
The remainder of Section 7 presents our recommendations
in detail. These recommendations are based on empiri-
cal and analytical methods typical of the standard of
practice in southern California. If these recommenda-
tions appear not to cover any specific feature of the
project, please contact our office for additions or
revisions to our recommendations.
...
...
...
...
7.2 Gradina and Earthwork
...
7.2.1 General
All earthwork and grading for site development
should be accomplished in accordance with the
attached Standard Guidelines for Grading Projects
(Appendix Dj, and Chapter 70 of the UBC. All
slJecial site lJrelJaration recommendations lJresented
in the followina lJaraaralJhs will SUlJercede those
in the attached Standard Guidelines for Gradina
Pro;ects.
...
...
...
...
...
jilL! ~;JtJ5
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The San Diego National Sports
Training Foundation
"January 23, 1990
Job No. 05-8095-001-01-00
Log No. 0-1113
Page 11
7.2.2 Geotechnical Observation
During grading, leG Incorporated should provide
observation and testing services continuously.
Foundation excavations should be observed before
placing reinforcing steel. Such observations are
considered essential to identify field conditions
that differ from those anticipated by the
preliminary investigations, to adjust designs to
actual field conditions, and to determine that the
grading is in general accordance with the
recommendations of this report. Our personnel
should perform sufficient testing of fill during
grading to support our professional opinion as to
compliance with compaction recommendations. .
7.2.3 Site preoaration
According to the site plan, the boathouse will
lie on a cut building pad. According to our
borings, we expect the footings to rest on dense
rock surfaces of the Sweetwater Formation. When
the excavation is completed, leG Incorporated
personnel should observe the excavation bottom to
verify this condition. The area beneath the slab-
on-grade should be scarified to a depth of 18-
inches, the moisture content raised to 4 per-
centage points above optimum, and recompacted.
The purpose of the scarification and moisture
conditioning is to mitigate expansive heave and
to provide uniform support for the slab.
The area between the boathouse and the lake should
be prepared to receive fill by removing all
F!I? ~ )0 b
The San Diego National Sports
Training Foundation
January 23, 1990
Job No. 05-8095-001-01-00
Log No. 0-1113
Page 12
vegetable matter and unsuitable soils as discussed
in our Standard Guidelines for Grading, Section
5.1, included herein as Appendix D. ICG personnel
should observe the removal surface.
7.2.4 Construction of Fill Pad at Lakefront
The fill pad between the boathouse and the water
is designed to extend out into the lake to permit
launching boats. The most economical means of
constructing this fill may be with dumped rock.
We recommend using clean, angular, durable,
igne~us rock. ICG Incorporated personnel should
observe the material before placement. If a
leveling course of compacted soil fill is placed
over the rock fill, a strong non-woven geotextile
such as Mirafi 180N, or a woven geotextile such
as Mirafi 700X should be placed over the rock
before placing soil fill in order to prevent
migration of soil particles into the rock fill.
The fabric should be protected from damage during
construction be placing a lift of soil at least
12 inches thick by end dumping and spreading and
compacting by light equipment.
Design of rip rap for wave protection should be by
a qualified civil engineer. We recommend that a
woven geotextile such as Mirafi 700X be placed
between the riprap and underlying soil as a filter
to prevent loss of soil partiCles. Filter fabric
is not required if the riprap overlies clean
"rockfill. A 6 inch thick soil cushion should be
placed over the fabric before placing the riprap
;(I! )07
-
-
...
-
...
-
-
...
-
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
I
I
The San Diego National Sports
Training Foundation
January 23, 1990
Job No. 05-8095-001-01-00
Log No. 0-1113
Page 13
to protect the fabric from damage during placement
of riprap.
7.2.5 TemDorarv Construction SIODes
Construction slopes up to approximately 12 feet
high will be required at the west side of the
boathouse. The slopes should be grossly stable
if constructed at a slope ratio of 0.75 horizon-
tal to 1 vertical.
If surcharge loads (such as equipment, material
stockpiles, or spoil banks) are placed along the
edges of excavations or slopes, the slope ratio
should be flattened from that given above.
Contact ICG Incorporated if such surcharges will
exist for specific recommendations.
Water should not be allowed to flow freely over
the tops of temporary slopes. Workmen should be
protected from the local ravelling and surficial
sliding that may still occur at the slope ratio
listed above. Temporary slopes and excavations
subjected to severe vibratory loads should be
analyzed for dynamic stability. leG Incorporated
should be contacted for further recommendations
if soil conditions are found that deviate from
those assumed or if evidence of instability
appears at the site.
ICG Incorporated makes no warranties as to
stability of temporary slopes since failures
common. Backcut failures may create the need
additional grading.
the
are
for
J1/-J /)'!JY;
The San Diego National Sports
Training Foundation
January 23,1990
Job No. 05-8095-001-01-00
Log No. 0-1113
Page 14
The Contractor should be responsible for the
temporary stability of all slopes. The.
recommendations of the Geotechnical Consultant
should be considered on a case-by-case basis.
Flatter slope ratios may be necessary to actual-
ly perform required grading. Actual backs lope
ratios are left to the discretion of the Con-
tractor as long as the minimum design ratios are
not exceeded and safety is not compromised. All
excavations should conform to Occupational safety
and Health Administration (OSHA) standards.
7.2.6 Fill Comoaction
Fill placed at the site should be compacted to a
minimum relative compaction of 90 percent based
on ASTM 01557 (modified Proctor). Fill should be
compacted by mechanical means in uniform lifts of
8 to 12 inches in thickness. Rock fragments
greater than 12 inches in maximum dimension should
not be placed within the compacted fill.
Sufficient observation and testing should be
performed by the geotechnical consultant so that
an opinion can be rendered as to the compaction
achieved.
Representative samples of imported materials and
on-site soils should be tested by the geotechni-
cal consultant in order to evaluate the maximum
density, optimum moisture content, and where
appropriate, shear strength, consolidation, and
expansion characteristics of the soil.
/L/f/~3tl7
..
-
...
..
...
...
..
...
~
..
..
....
"'!
..
..
"'!
...
...
..
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The San Diego National Sports
Training Foundation
January 23, 1990
Job No. 05-8095-001-01-00
Log No. 0-1113
Page 15
7.2.7 Trench Backfill
All trench backfill should be compacted by
mechanical means in uniform lifts of 8 to 12
inches. The backfill should be uniformly
compacted to at least 90 percent of ASTM D1557.
7.3 site Drainaae
Foundation and slab performance depends greatly on how
well runoff waters drain from the site. This is true
both during construction and over the entire life of the
structure. The ground surface around structures should
be graded so that water flows rapidly away from the
structures without ponding. The surface gradient needed
to achieve this depends on the type of landscaping. In
general, we recommend that pavement and lawn areas within
five feet of buildings slope away at gradients of at
least two percent. Densely vegetated areas should have
minimum gradients of at least five percent away from
buildings in the first five feet. Densely vegetated
areas are considered those in which the planting type and
spacing is such that the flow of water is impeded.
Planters should be built so that water from them will
not seep into the foundation, slab, or pavement areas.
site irrigation should be limited to the minimum
necessary to sustain landscaping plants. Should
excessive irrigation, waterline breaks, or unusually high
rainfall occur, saturated zones or "perched" groundwater
may develop in fill soils.
;t!fJ ~3)tJ
The San Diego National sports
Training Foundation
January 23, 1990
Job No. 05-8095-001-01-00
Log No. 0-1113
Page 16
7.4 Foundation Recommendations
7.4.1 General
Our recommendations are considered to be gene-
rally consistent with the standards of practice.
They are based on both analytical methods and
empirical methods derived from experience with
similar geotechnical conditions. Reinforcement
recommendations are considered the minimum
necessary for the likely soil conditions and are
not intended to supersede the design of the
structural engineer or criteria of governing
agencies.
7.4.2 Foundations on Sweetwater Formation Cut Surfaces
The following design criteria apply for founda-
tions on cut surfaces in sandstones of the
Sweetwater Formation.
Allowable Soil
Bearing:
4000 psf (allow one-third
increase for intermittent
loads such as wind or seismic)
Minimum Footing Width:
Minimum Footing Depth:
12 inches
18 inches below lowest adjacent
soil grade
Design as simply supported beam
capable of supporting the
applied loads over a span of 7
feet. Equal resistance to
positive and negative moments
should be provided.
Minimum Reinforcement:
Passive Pressure for
Lateral Resistance:
350 pcf
pressure
equivalent
fluid
Jill / )/j
...
...
...
...
...
'""
...
...
'""
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
'""
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The San Diego National Sports
Training Foundation
January 23, 1990
Job No. 05-8095-001-01-00
Log No. 0-1113
Page 17
Coefficient of Friction
(Soil/Concrete): 0.40
7.4.3 Foundations on Comoacted Fill
The following design criteria apply for founda-
tions on compacted fill.
Allowable Soil
Bearing:
2000 psf (allow one-third
increase for intermittent
loads such as wind or seismic)
Minimum Footing width:
Minimum Footing Depth:
12 inches
Minimum Reinforcement:
18 inches below lowest adjacent
soil grade
Design as simply supported beam
capable of supporting the
applied loads over a span of 7
feet. Equal resistance to
positive and negative moments
should be provided.
Passive Pressure for
Lateral Resistance:
250 pcf
pressure
equivalent
fluid
Coefficient of Friction
(Soil/Concrete): 0.35
7.4.4 On-arade Slabs
Ordinary on-grade slabs may be used if underlain
entirely by bedrock or entirely by a reasonably
uniform thickness of compacted fill. If the fill
depth beneath the slab varies greatly, we
recommend overexcavating such that the minimum
depth of fill beneath the slab is 3 feet. If the
slab is supported partly by bedrock and partly by
IrfJ r 3/:J-
The San Diego National Sports
Training Foundation
January 23, 1990
Job No. 05-8095-001-01-00
Log No. 0-1113
Page 18
fill, or by greatly varying depths of fill,
differential settlement may occur. If a slab-
on-grade on fill is used with footings on bedrock,
:i:t should be isolated from the foundation to allow
for differential movement.
Concrete slabs supported by the soil may be
designed by a structural engineer for a modulus
of subgrade reaction of 250 kips per cubic foot.
We recommend that slabs be reinforced with
deformed bars rather than mesh because mesh is
frequently forced to the extreme bottom of the
slab where it is of little or no use.
Concrete slabs constructed on soil - ul timately
cause the moisture content to rise in the
underlying soil. This results from - continued
capillary rise and the absence of normal evapo-
transpiration. Because most concrete is perme-
able, the moisture will eventually penetrate the
slab unless some protection is provided. This
may cause mildewed carpets, lifting and dis-
coloration of floor tile, or similar problems.
To minimize these problems, suitable moisture
protection measures should be used. These
measures should protect against both free water
resulting from capillary rise, and water vapor.
Various alternatives exist, such as concrete
toppings and additives or synthetic moisture-
resistant membranes. Information on product
usage, installation, and warranty should be
obtained from the manufacturer if such produc~s
are used. The measures can be made more effec-
JL/;9- 513
-
-
""!
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
"'"
-
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
The San Diego National sports
Training Foundation
January 23, 1990
Job No. 05-8095-001-01-00
Log No. 0-1113
Page 19
tive by installing a capillary break under the
membrane or damp-proof slab. For a capillary
break with a minimum thickness of four inches,
the following criteria should be observed:
1. It should consist of gravel or crushed
rock having a maximum particle size of
3/4-inches or less, as placed;
2. Not more than 10% (by weight) should pass
the No. 16 U.S. Standard Sieve (1.18 mm),
as placed;
3. Not more than 5% (by weight) should pass
the No. 200 U.S. Standard Sieve (0.075
mm) .
If waterproof membranes are installed beneath
concrete slabs, at least 1 inch of fine-grained
sand should be placed between the membrane nd the
floor slab to minimize potential curing problems
in the concrete.
7.4.5 Settlement
If the recommendations contained in this report
are followed, we expect total settlement of
structures on compacted fill areas to be less than
1 inch, and differential settlement is expected
to be less than 3/4 inch across the structure.
Total and differential settlements of the
boathouse, if it is founded on cut surfaces should
be less than 50% of the above estimates for
compacted fill. If more exact settlement
);j/Jr)}tJ
..
The San Diego National Sports
Training Foundation
January -23, 1990
Job No. 05-8095-001-01-00
Log No. 0-1113
Page 20
-
...
determinations are desired, it will be necessary
to perform a detailed review of the actual
foundations plans and loading conditions.
....
...
7.5 Retainina Walls
...
The allowable bearing pressures given in section 7 may
be used for walls.
..
The recommended lateral earth pressures for walls with
level backfill are presented in Table 2. The active
pressure may be used for walls capable of rotating
sufficiently to allow active pressure to develop (at
least 0.1 percent of wall height). The at-rest pressure
should be used for retaining walls and building walls
below grade that are not capable of rotating. The effect
of surcharges should be taken into account when computing
retaining wall loading.
..
,
...
...
...
TABLE 2
Lateral Earth Pressures, With Level Drained Backfill-
(Equivalent Fluid Weight, pcf)
...
...
On-Site Soil
Active 45
At Rest 65
Select Granular Backfill
35
55
...
...
All backfill behind retaining walls, including subgrade
building walls, should be properly drained to eliminate
the effects of hydrostatic pressure and to minimize
moisture problems. Wall pressures may be much greater
than indicated above if the backfill becomes saturated.
Drain outfalls should slope at gradients of at least 1.5%
....
...
....
;11 ~J/;{
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
The San Diego National Sports
Training Foundation
January 23, 1990
Job No. 05-8095-001-01-00
Log No. 0-1113
Page 21
to a storm drain or other suitable outlet. We suggest
that wall drain designs be reviewed by ICG Incorporated.
Retaining wall backfill should be compacted to at least
90 percent relative compaction. Backfill soils should
consist of nonexpansive materials. The use of expansive
soils as retaining wall backfill can significantly
increase the earth pressures acting on the wall.
I
I
I
I
It should be noted that the use of heavy compaction
equipment in close proximity to the retaining structure
can induce pressures on the structures far beyond those
due to the above recommended earth pressures. In this
regard, the contractor should take appropriate precau-
tions in backfill placement.
7.6 Reactive Soil
..
.
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
Sulfate test results are presented in Table
sulfate tests indicate that the on site soils
be detrimental to Type I Portland cement.
C-2. The
should not
7.7
Pavement Desian
The following preliminary pavement sections are based on
an estimated subgrade R-value of 20. When final
subgrades are reached, R-value samples should be
collected and tested to arrive at final pavement
sections.
Parking Areas (TI = 4.0)
3 inches Asphalt over
4.5 inches Class 2 Aggregate Base
J'-I4'}I?
...
The San Diego ,National Sports
Training Foundation
January 23, 1990
Job No. 05-8095-001-01-00
Log No. 0-1113
Page 22
....
-
Access and Fire Lanes (TI = 5.0)
3 inches Asphalt over
7 inches Class 2 Aggregate Base
Truck Lanes (TI = 5.5)
3 inches Asphalt over
9 inches Class 2 Aggregate Base
.....
...
....
We recommend that the- upper 12-inches of pavement
subgrade soils should be scarified and moistened to near
optimum conditions and compacted to 95 percent or more
of maximum dry density before placing the base course.
...
J
...
Specifications for Class 2 aggregate base may be ~elected
from Section 200-2 of the "Standard Specifications for
Public Works Construction" and should have an R-value of
78 or more. We recommend that you require the Contractor
or supplier to assure conformance with specifications.
We recommend that all aggregate base be compacted to 95
percent of the maximum laboratory density. Asphal t
concrete type and class should be as required by the
project specifications.
....
...
...
-
..
7.8 Review of Plans
'"
As foundation and grading plans are completed, they
should be forwarded to ICG Incorporated for review for
conformance with the intent of these recommendations.
-
...
8.0 LIMITATIONS OF INVESTIGATION
-
Our investigation was performed using the degree of care an
skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by
reputable Soils Engineers and GeOlogists practicing in this
or similar localities. No other warranty, expressed or
...
...
JL(1~}17
...
I
I
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
The San Diego National Sports
Training Foundation
January 23, 1990
Job No. 05-8095-001-01-00
Log No. 0-1113
.Page 23
implied, is made as to the conclusions and professional advice
included in this report.
The samples taken and used for testing and the observations
made are believed representative of the entire project;
however, soil and geologic conditions can vary significantly
between borings.
As in most major projects, conditions revealed by excavation
may be at variance with preliminary findings. If this occurs,
the changed conditions must be evaluated by the Project soils
Engineer and Geologist and designs adjusted as required or
alternate designs recommended.
This report is issued with the understanding that it is the
responsibility of the owner, or of his representative, to.
ensure that the information and recommendations contained
herein are brought to the attention of the architect and
engineer for the project and incorporated into the plans, and
the necessary steps are taken to see that the contractor and
subcontractors carry out such recommendations in the field.
This firm does not practice or consult in the field of safety
engineering. We do not direct the contractor's operations,
and we cannot be responsible for other than our own personnel
on the site; therefore, the safety of others is the respon-
sibility of the contractor. The contractor should notify the
owner if he considers any of the recommended actions presented
herein to be unsafe.
The findings of this report are valid as of the present date.
However, changes in the conditions of a property can occur
with the passage of time, whether they be due to natural
processes or the works of man on this or adjacent properties.
In addition, changes in applicable or appropriate standards
ji!/) / J/~
~
The San Diego National Sports
Training Foundation
January 23, 1990
Job No. 05-8095-001-01-00
Log No. 0-1113
Page 24.
....
-
may occur, whether they result from legislation or the
broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, the findings of this
report may be invalid wholly or partially by changes outside
our control. Therefore, this report is subject to review and
should not be relied upon after a period of three years.
....
'""
:;;..
...
ICG INCORPORATED
....
Reviewed by:
~!~!!:::E. C "'"
Registration Expires 3-31-90
Project Engineer
c./j!?L,7~.~ /
Anthony r( Belfast P.E. C 40333
Vice President, Principal Engineer
-
....
RMM/AFB/rm
'"
""
..
~
..
"'l
...
"'"
,
-
Flfi- )1;
-
I
t
I
1
I'
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPEND:IX A
References
}L(/J~3;LO .
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I,
1.
2.
APPENDIX A
REFERENCES
ICG Incorporated, November 13, 1989, Geotechnical Investiga-
tion, u. S. olympic Training Center, San Diego County,
California, Job No. 05-8095-001-01-00
Jennings, C. W., 1975, Fault Map of California: California
Division of Mines and-Geology, California Geologic Data
Map Series.
3
Seed, H. B., and Idriss, I. M., 1982, Ground Motions and Soil
Liquefaction During Earthquakes: Berkeley, CA, Earth-
quake Engineering Research Institute, l34p.
5.
Wesnousky, S. G., 1986, Earthquakes, Quaternary Faults, and
Seismic Hazard in California: Journal of Geophysical
Research, v. 91, no. B12, p. 12587-12631.
6.
California Division of Mines and Geology, 1975, Recommended
Guidelines for Determining and Maximum Credible and the
Maximum Probable Earthquakes: California Division of
Mines and Geology Notes, Number 43.
Hileman, J. A., 1979, seismicity of the San Diego Region, in
Abbot, P. L., and Elliott, W. J., eds., Earthquakes and
other perils, San Diego region: San Diego Association
of Geologists, guidebook for Geological Society of
America Annual Meeting, 1979, p. 11-20.
7.
Fin - 3d-I
I
I
I
I
I
t
,
I
I
I
t
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX B
Field Exploration
/ tJ/1 / )J-J-
PRIMARY DIVISIONS
... GRA VELS
en ~ MORE THAN
~=c
- '" C HALf OF
~ ~ ~ COARSE
Q ~ g FRACnON IS
W ~ z ~!U.RGER THAN
~... ~..., NO.4 SIEV!!
<"'-11I
= ~ ~ ~I SANDS
ell z: \!! ;; MOR!! THAN
W c := HALf OF
en::-
= t- ~ COARSE
< IU .. FRACnON IS
o 15 - SMALLIER TH
Co) ~ NO.4 all!V!!
I
f
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
en "'I
-I "'- =!::!.
00......'
rn ~ = wi
- < >1
C.:~,"l
W = ~;li
z=mCl
-,,<-a
< :...""
=1-< "'
'" _ 01
......=Zl
='" I
WO"z
z. C<I
--2:
II. ..
GRAV!!L
WITH FINES
DEFINITION OF TERMS I
1 SYMaOLS I SECONDARY DIVISIONS'J
::_ GW IW." ora_ ora".... ora".I__ mI....... Utu. or fi"
~_ t......
_ GP IPoony oraa.o or."." or ora"....... m........ Utu. or I.
_ 1 no fino..
_ GM ISIItv ora".... oravot-e-t1t ml._... n_.lIG
- I.......
GC ICIa.,.,. 0,.".... gra"....._I." mlXtU.... 0.......
t......
CLEAN
SANDa
(LESS THAN .
5.. FINES) :: .,', .
SANDS
WITH FINES
SILTS AND CLAYS
LIQUID LIMIT IS
LESS THAN 50..
SILTS AND CLAYS
LIQUID LIMIT IS
GREATER THAN 50..
HIGHLY ORGANIC SOILS
W.II or.o.. ...... gra".1Iy ..no.. Ultla ... no I......
SP Poony oraO" ._ or ora"811y una.. IIItIe at: nit II~~..j
SM Silty ._.. ..-.11t mI....... n_la.tto I_
S C I CIa,.., ._.. .an_.., m1._... ola..1o tinea.
ML lln-o.nta .llta .na "ery fin. ..no., ra... f_. .11.1" or'
cta.,.., fln8 ..na. or c..... .dt. WI'" ....... D..ttcltv. I
CI. Iln...o.nta el.". of 'ow 10 m.Olum 01......1ty. or."."v I
tet..,.. ..... ct..,.. t..n ctav..
OL joro.nlO .lIta ana oro.nl.. .1I1y el.'. of low o"."Cllv.l
MH Iln_- .1I1a. _......u. or ol.lom....au. I.... unav
or ....., 10'''. .....ta a.lta.
CH Inaroanl.. cia.,. 01 1I10ll ola........" t.1 el....
o H ,ora._ cla.,. 01 m.._ 10 111011 ol...lOllY. ""lIanlO
.lIt..
GRAIN SIZES
SAND
MEDIUM COARS!! I
.0 10 4
u.s. STANDARD SERIES SIEVE
GROUNDWATER LEVEL AT TIM!! OF DRILLING:
GRAVEL I COBBLES IBOULDERS
FINE I COAR8!!
31.' a' 12"
CLaAR SOUARE SIEVE OPENINGS
SILTS AND CLAYS
:;
J
[I
I
IJ
I
FINE
:100
GROUNDWATER LEVEL MEASURED LATER IN STANDPIPE.
LOCAnON OF SAMPLE TAICEN USING A'STANDARD SPLIT TUBE SAMPLER..
:I-INCH O.D_ 1-S/8-INCH 1.0. DRIV!!N WITH"A 140POUNO HAMMER FALLiNII
aO-INCHES.
LOCATION OF SAMPLE TAlC EN, USING A MODIFIED CALIFORNIA SAMPLER.
a-"S-INCH 0.0_ WITH :I-1I1-INCH I.D. LINER RINIIS. DRIVEN USING THE
WeiGHT OF ICELLY BAR (LARIIE DIAMETER BORINGS) OR USING A 140 POUND
HAMMER FALLING 30-INCH!!S (SMALL DIAMaTER BORINII):
LOCATION OF SAMPLE TAICEN USINII A 3-INCH 0.0. THIN-WALLED TUBE SAMPLER
(SHELBY TUBE) HYDRAULICALLY PUSHED.
LOCATION OF BULIC SAMPLE TAlCaN F"OM AUG!!R CUTTINGS.
KEY TO LOGS - UNIFIED SOIL CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (ASTM 0-2487)
JOB NO.: DATE: FIGURE: 8-1
JANUARY 1990
) VA' 3,):3
DATE OBSERVED: 12-20-89
LOGGED BY: RM
~ Q w
... ...
W IZ a w ...
mw ..
w ILa a :I:
.. IL a:...
...... ::J.. ..
~ ..... ,
.... .. "':1: ..
:I: "u :I .... "
... dM a ::;.. 5
.. ... z
w m ::J m
Q
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
..
1
LOCATION:
See MaD.
METHOD OF DRILLING: 8" Hollow Stem AU2er
...
LOG OF BORING NO.1
Sheet I of I
DESCRZPTZON
TOPSOIL/COLLUVIUM: Light brown
gravelly silty SAND (SM), dry,
medium dense
SWEETWATER FORMA nON (Tswl:
Light yellow gray to brown fine to
coarse clayey SANDSTONE with
gravel (SC), dry, very dense
Hard Gravelly Layer
Refusal At 13'
No Water
leG Incor orated
....
SOZL TEST
....
...
PARTICLE SIZE
A TTERBERG LIMITS
MAX DENSITY
OPTIMUM MOISTURE
EXPANSION DIRECT
SHEAR SULFATES
RESISTIVITY pH
....
GROUND ELEVATION: 500'
~ )oIL
WX 2ju
a:~ ..
::J.. III"".
t-z 0)-
cnw <1:...
H... ...lM
0% ELfI'J
Eo ZZ
U H~
-.
..
"
..
.....
...
-
..
.,
...
..
-
B-2
}t/Il / :J.;Ltj
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
DATE OBSERVED: 12-20-89
S e Ma
METHOD OF DRILLING: 8" Hollow Stem AU2er
I
,
I
.. ~
LOGGED BY: RM
~ Q w
... ... W .J
W '% 0 "w II.
W "0 0 G:.J z:
.. ...... .. :::lll. 4:
~ ..... , ..
"4: .. Ei
:z: 4:u :3 "
... d'" 0 Q 5
II. .J %
W ., :::l .,
Q
0
GROUND ELEVATION:~ LOCATION:
~ '"..
w" !!lull.
G:~
:)~ w....
~z U,..
fnw cz:~
Jo4~ ..JH
0% a..-(J)
Eo ZZ
(J H~
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
LOG OF BORING NO.2
Sheet I of I
DESCR%PT%DN
TOPSOIL/COLLUVIUM: Light brown
gravelly silty SAND (SM), dry,
medium dense
SWEETWATER FORMATION (Tswl:
Light yellow gray to brown, gravelly
fine to coarse clayey silty
SANDSTONE (SC), dry to slightly
moist, dense
Refusal At 7'
No Water
leG Incor orated
SOIL. TEST
PARTICLE SIZE
A TTERBERG LIMITS
EXPANSION
SULFATES
RESISTIVITY pH
J tjfJ - )):5
""l
DATE OBSERVED: 12-20-89
METHOD OF DRILLING: 8" Hollow Stem AUlIer
LOGGED BY: RM GROUND ELEVATION: 487' LOCATION: See MaD -
"
~ Q W ~ >-..
l- I- W oJ w;:( "'" LOG OF BORING NO.3
w ':'5 Q "w II. 011.
W 0 "'oJ I: "'~ WW
.. ...... .. ::;)11. '" ::;)1- Sheet I of
~ "I- , I-z ">- I ...
..", .. I-I: .. "w "'I- SOIL TEST
:r "'" :3 ..", " "'1- oJ...
I- cl'" 0 ..... Oz 11...
II. oJ if oJ I:o DESCRIPTION
::;) Zz
W ., ::;) ., " ...w
Q
0 Q
-
. . TOPSOIL/COLLUVIUM: Gray brown
gravelly silty fine to coarse SAND
(SM) with cobbles, dry. dense
...
SWEETWATER FORMATION (Tswr.
5 Light gray to yellowish brown clayey
26 silty fine to coarse SAND (SC), EXPANSION ...
slightly moist, dense
26
....
10 Refusal At 10'
No Water -
...
15
.."
20
....
...
25
-
...
30
...
...
35
.,
leG Incor orated
-
JifJ- JJ 6
-
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DATE OBSERVED: 12-20-89
LOCATION:
See MaD
METHOD OF DRILLING: 8" Hollow Stem AU2er
-I
~-, I
. LOGGED BY: RM
^ c w
.... .... w it
W '% 0 "w
W "0 0 !!i.J :E:
.. ...... .. '"
~ "'.... " lii~ '"
"'", '"
:z: 5u ~ "
.... Ij., 5
a. u'" .J 5
w .. ..
c
0
GROUND ELEVATION: 482'
^ >-..
IIIx. !o
a:~ a.
::I... III....
I-:z: ~>
"w .J""
"'.... ...
~% a..,
o %%
U 1-4~
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
LOG OF BORING NO.4
Sheet I of I
OI!SCRZPTZON
TOPSOIL/COLLUVIUM: Light gray
to yellow brown clayey silty fine to
coarse SAND (SM), slightly moist,
medium dense
SWEETWATER FORMATION ITswr.
Light gray to orange brown clayey
silty fine to coarse SAND (SC),
slightly moist, dense
Total Depth 16.5'
No Water
leG Incor orated
SOZL. TEST
PARTICLE SIZE
A TTERBERG LIMITS
EXPANSION MAX
DENSITY
OPTIMUM MOISTURE
DIRECT SHEAR
SULFATES pH
RESISTIVITY
l~ /i - _717 )2?
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX C
Laboratory Testing Program
)t/fI ~ ']~c;{
I
,
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX C
LABORATORY TESTING
Selected representative samples of soils encountered were tested
using test methods of the American society for Testing and Mater-
ials, or other generally accepted standards. A brief description
of the tests performed follows:
Classification: Soils were classified visually according to the
Unified Soil classification System. Visual classification was
supplemented by laboratory testing of selected samples and clas-
sification in accordance with ASTM 02487. The soil classificat-
ions are shown on the Boring Logs.
Particle size Analvsis: Particle size analyses were performed in
accordance with ASTM 0422. The results are provided on the
following Figures C-l and C-2.
Atterbera Limits: ASTM 04318-84 was used to determine liquid and
plastic limits. Figures C-l and C-2 show the test results.
Excansion Test: Expansion tests were performed on representative
samples which were visually determined to contain a sufficient per-
centage . of. clay to be detrimentally expansive. Tests were
performed in accordance with the Uniform Building Code (UBCl No.
29-2. Samples were remolded and surcharged to 144 psf prior to
saturation. The test results are summarized on the attached Table
C-l.
Direct Shear Tests: consolidated, drained direct shear tests were
performed in accordance with ASTM 0 3080. Tests were performed
using remolded bulk samples and tested in a saturated condition
using normal loads of 1 ksf, 2 ksf, and 4 ksf. The result of the
shear tests are presented on Figure C-3.
Sulfate Content: To assess their potential for reactivity with
concrete, typical samples were tested for content of water-soluble
sulfate minerals using CALTRANS method 417 (part Il. The results
are listed in Table C-2.
)z/A- JZr
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
I
I,
~
...
u
...
...
i
Q
a:
c
Q
Z
~
It
.s
:)
IU I
Z It
;0: IU
N
i
IU
>
IU
i
Q
Z
C
It 2
::l
Ci
IU
2
IU
It
a:
C
o
U
...
IU
~
a:
I!I
o.
o
~
PERCENT PASSING
o 0 0
.. ...
o
o
..
o
o
o
..
o
..
... .. .. ~ 0
~
g
..
/ ~
0
g
~ /
II
51 j J
11 I
0
... /
0 /
..
0
0
V -'
V
/ /
I I
I r7
.
CD
....
.. 1 I. 0
0
1/ ~
~
0 0 0 0
..
..
~
o
~
It
...
;,
....
~
..
....
~
;,
....
..
2 ..
o
..
o
..
5! 0
..
o 0 0
.. ... ...
PERCENT PASSING
.
~
o
~
z ~~
0
5 - -
i i
u
;0: CIl CIl
in >- >-
'" IU IU
C ~ S
...
U <.l
>C
IU
Q
!
>-
... .. 0
Q .. ..
;:
'"
C
...
ll.
...
2
::::;
Q CD ..
:; ... ...
0
::::;
...
0
aI ~
2e
>-
..
-
...
IU
IU
... ;. ;.
-
:I: I I
... in ..
ll.
IU
Q
c:i
z
I!I
z ~ ..
;;:
0
aI
CIl
a:
IU
...
IU
2
::::;
...
2
I
IU
N
in
IU
...
U
;:
a:
c
ll.
FIGURE:
C-1
Jill -530
JOB NO.:
05-8095-001-01-00
PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS
ca
z
e
00 ~
::l
E
III
~
o
o
~
PERCENT PASSING
o 0 0
Cl .. .
o
~
o
..
o
Cl
o
...
o
..
o
N
?c
...
U
.I
I
V
J.
V
/
V
/
/
J
I-
::!
00
III
Z
io:
ca
lIC
e
cao
ZO
eN
...
00
.;
:j0
,S!
00
III
N
;;
1110
>"'
III
-0
00.
o
..
o
N
Cl
~
o
~
III
00
lIC
e
o
u
Cl
.
...
III
~
lIC
c:l
...
..
~
.
III
....
....
w
....
~
...
....
"0
o
~
o
..
o
III
o
...
o
Cl
o
..
o
.
o
..
o
N
o
~
PERCENT PASSING
.lOB HO~
-001-Q1-00
PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS
o
...
o~
o
q
-
z (J
0 !e
5 i
u
~ '"
'" >-
00 ~
e
... d
u
)(
III
ca
25
>-
l- N
U ..
;:
'"
e
...
...
I-
2
:i
ca ..
:; ..
a
:i
...
0
GO .
~
>
'"
-
I-
III
III
"- in
- ~
:z: I
l- e
... ~
III
ca
ci
z
c:l .
z
i
0
GO
....
...
-
...
~
q
...
...
'"
lIC
III
I-
III
~
~:i
....
0_
~
I
III
N
;;;
III
...
U
;:
lIC
e
...
...
..
...
..
...
o
-'
-
...
...
o
o
~
""l
FIGURE:
C-2
-
PI/} - 33 /
...
I BORING DEPTH COHESION, ANGLE OF SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
NO. (FEET) (PSFl FRICTION,o
1 5'-7' 230 33 FINE TO COARSE CLAYEY SAND ($C)
I 4000
I
3000
-
I ...
<II
II.
-
:z:
..
I ell
Z
III
II: 2000
..
<II
I ell
Z
a:
c
III
:z:
I <II
I
I 00 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 8000
NORMAL LOAD (PSFl
BORING DEPTH COHESION. ANGLE OF SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
NO. (FEET) (PSFl FRICTION 0
I 4 10'-15' 200 211.5 F1NE TO COARSE CLAYEY SAND ($C)
4000
I
I 3000
-
...
<II
II.
-
:z:
I ..
ell
Z
III
II: 2000
..
I <II
ell
Z
a:
c
I III
:z:
<II
1000
I
I 00 1000 2000 3000 4000 00 8000
NORMAL LOAD (PSFl
I JOB NO~ SHEARING STRENGTH TEST
1-01
I Jy/J--- 3J;)-
...
BORINel
NO.
1
DEPTH
(FEET)
5'_7'
COHESION,
(PSF>
230
ANGLE OF
FRICTION,o
33
SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
FINE TO COARSE CLAYEY SAND (SCl
4000
...
"'"
3000
iO: ...
.,
II.
-
::
...
CI ....
Z
III
II:
...
.,
CI ...
z
i
c
III
:: -
.,
...
00 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 8000 ...
NORMAL LOAD (PSF>
BORING DEPTH COHESION, ANGLE OF SAMPLE DESCRIPTION
NO. (FEET) (PSF> FRICTIONo
4 10'-15' 200 21l.5 F1tE TO COARSE CLAYEY SAND (SCl ...
4000
...
3000 ..
-
...
.,
II.
-
.:: -j
...
CI
Z
III
II: 2000
...
., ...
CI
z
i
c
III ....
::
.,
1000
...
00
...
1000
2000 3000 4000
NORMAL LOAD (PSF>
5000
8000
1-01-00
SHEARING STRENGTH TEST
...
JOB NO.:
/r/1~J33
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE C-1
RESULTS OF EXPANSION TESTS
SAMPLE EXPANSION EXPANSION
LOCATION INDEX
B-1 @
5 TO 7 FEET 49 MODERATE
B-2 @
6 TO 7 FEET 60 MODERATE
B-4 @
10 TO 15 FEET . 89 MODERATE
.
TABLE C-2
RESULTS OF CHEMICAL TESTS
SAMPLE SOLUBLE MINIMUM
LOCATION SULFATE RESISTIVITY pH
ppm ohm - em
B-1 @
5 TO 7 FEET > 400, < 800 734 4.8
B-4 @
10 TO 15 FEET > 400, < 800 473 8.2
pill - ]'3 f
..
...
TABLE C-3
MAXIMUM DENSITY/OPTIMUM MOISTURE
(ASTM 1557-78)
...
SAMPLE MAXIMUM DRY OPTIMUM
LOCATION DENSITY MOISTURE CONTENT
(POUNDS PER (PERCENT)
CUBIC FOOT)
B-1 @
5 TO 7 FEET 123.0 11.9
B-4 @
10 TO 15 FEET 124.3 10.7
...
...
...
..
...
"
...
...
oIIII!I.
-
...
..
...
~
"'l
/I/!- JJ~
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX D
standard Guidelines for Grading projects
/L/f? ~ J J~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,"
I
I
STANDARD GUIDELINES FOR GRADING PROJECTS
1 . GENERAL
1.1 Representatives of the Geotechnical Consultant should
be present on-site during gradin~ operations in order
to make observations and perform tests so that
professional opinions can be developed. The opinion
will address whether grading has proceeded in
accordance with the Geotechnical Consultant's
recommendations and applicable project specifications;
if the site soil and geologic conditions are as
anticipated in the preliminary investigation; and if
additional recommendations are warranted by any
unexpected site conditions. Services do not include
supervision or direction of the actual work of the
contractor, his employees or agents.
1.2 The guidelines contained herein and the standard
details attached hereto represent this firm's standard
recommendations for grading and other associated
operations on construction projects. These guidelines
should be considered a portion of the report to which
they are appended.
1.3 All plates attached hereto shall be considered as part
of these guidelines.
1.4 The Contractor should not vary from these guidelines
without prior recommendation by the Geotechnical
Consultant and the approval of the Client or his
authorized representative.
1.5 These Standard Grading Guidelines and Standard Details
may be modified and/or superseded by recommendations
contained in the text of the preliminary"geotechnical
report and/or subsequent reports.
1.6 If disputes arise out of the interpretation of these
grading guidelines or standard details, the Geotech-
nical Consultant should determine the appropriate
interpretation.
2. DEFINITIONS OF TERMS
2.1 ALLUVIUM -- Unconsolidated detrital deposits resulting
from flow of water, including sediments deposited in
river beds, canyons, flood plains, lakes, fans at the
foot of slopes and estuaries.
/ (/1 - ),3 7
-
Standard Guidelines
for Grading Projects
Page 2
-
...
2.2 AS-GRADED (AS-BUILT) -- The surface and subsurface
conditions at completion of grading.
BACKCUT -- A temporary construction slope at the rear
of earth retaining structures such as buttresses,
shear keys, stabilization fills or retaining walls.
BACKDRAIN -- Generally a pipe and gravel or similar
drainage system placed behind earth retaining
structures such buttresses, stabilization fills, and
retaining walls.
BEDROCK -- A more or less solid, relatively undis-
turbed rock in place either at the surface or beneath
superficial deposits of soil.
BENCH -- A relatively level step and near vertical
rise excavated into sloping ground on which fill is to
be placed.
2.7 BORROW (Import) -- Any fill material hauled to the
project site from off-site areas.
2.3
2.4
2.5
2.6
...
-
""
"'I
-
...
2.8 BUTTRESS FILL -- A fill mass, the configuration of
which is designed by engineering calculations to
retain slope conditions containing adverse geologic
features. A buttress is generally specified by
minimum key width and depth and by maximum backcut
angle. A buttress normally contains a backdrainage
system.
2.9 CIVIL ENGINEER -- The Registered Civil Engineer or
consulting firm responsible for preparation of the
grading plans, surveying and verifying as-graded
topographic conditions.
2.10 COLLUVIUM -- Generally loose deposits usually found
near the base of slopes and brought there chiefly by
gravity through slope continuous downhill creep (also
see Slope Wash).
2.11 COMPACTION -- Is the densification of a fill by
mechanical means.
"'I
....
....,
....
...
....
2.12 CONTRACTOR -- A person or company under contract or
otherwise retained by the Client to perform
demolation, grading and other site improvements.
...
...
....
/1//1- 33~
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Standard Guidelines.
for Grading Projects
Page 3
2.13 DEBRIS -- All products of clearing. grubbing,
demolition, contaminated soil material unsuitable for
reuse as compacted fill and/or any other material so
designated by the Geotechnical Consultant.
2.14 ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST -- A Geologist holding a valid
certificate of registration in the specialty of
Engineering Geology.
2.15 ENGINEERED FILL -- A fill of which the Geotechnical
Consultant or his representative, during grading, has
made sufficient tests to enable him to conclude that
the fill has been placed in substantial compliance
with the recommendations of the Geotechnical
Consultant and the governing agency requirements.
2.16 EROSION -- The wearing away of the ground surface as a
result of the movement of wind, water. and/or ice.
2~17 EXCAVATION -- The mechanical removal of earth
materials.
2.18 EXISTING. GRADE -- The ground surface configuration
prior to grading.
2.19 FILL -- Any deposits of soil, rock, soil-rock blends
or other similar materials placed by man.
2.20 FINISH GRADE -- The ground surface configuration at
which time the surface elevations conform to the
approved plan.
2.21 GEOFABRIC -- Any engineering textile utilized in
geotechnical applications including subgrade
stabilization and filtering.
2.22 GEOLOGIST -- A representative of the Geotechnical
Consultant educated and trained in the field of
geology.
2.23 GEOTECHNICAL CONSULTANT -- The Geotechnical Engineer-
ing and Engineering Geology consulting firm retained
to provide technical services for the project. For
the purpose of these guidelines, observations by the
Geotechnical Consultant include observations by the
Geotechnical Engineer, Engineering Geologist and those
performed by persons employed by and responsible to
the Geotechnical Consultants.
/~h~33/
-
Standard Guidelines
for Grading Projects
Page 4
..
...
2.24 GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEER -- A licensed Civil Engineer who
applies scientific methods, engineering principles and
professional experience to the acquisition, inter-
pretation and use of knowledge of materials of the
earth's crust for the evaluation of engineering
problems. Geotechnical Engineering encompasses many
. of the engineering aspects of soil mechanics, rock
mechanics, geology, geophysics, hydrology and related
sciences.
-
...
-
2.25 GRADING -- Any operation consisting of excavation,
filling or combinations thereof and associated
operations.
..
2.26 LANDSLIDE DEBRIS -- Material, generally porous and of
low density, produced from instability of natural of
man-made slopes.
..
2.27 MAXIMUM DENSITY -- Standard laboratory test for
maximum dry unit weight. Unless otherwise specified,
the maximum dry unit weight shall be determined in
accordance with ASTM Method of Test D1557.
...
2.28 OPTIMUM MOISTURE -- Test moisture content at the
maximum density.
...
2.29 RELATIVE COMPACTION -- The degree of compaction
(expressed as a percentage) of dry unit weight of a
material as compared to the maximum dry unit weight of
the material.
-
..
2.30 ROUGH GRADE -- The ground surface configuration at
which time the surface elevations approximately
conform to the approved plan.
2.31 SITE -- The particular parcel of land where grading is
being performed.
2.32 SHEAR KEY -- Similar to buttress, however, it is
generally constructed by excavating a slot within a
natural slope in order to stabilize the upper portion
of the slope without grading encroaching into the .
lower portion of the slope.
2.33 SLOPE -- Is an inclined ground surface the steepness
of which is generally specified as a ratio of
horizontal:vertical (e.g., 2:1).
2.34 SLOPE WASH -- Soil and/or rock material that has been
transported down a slope by mass wasting assisted by
runoff water not confined by channels (also see
Colluvium) .
...
...
...
...
...
...
Jil/J - J' 710
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Standard Guidelines
for Grading Projects
Page 5
2.35 SOIL -- Naturally occurring deposits of sand, silt,
clay, etc., or combinations thereof.
2.36 SOIL ENGINEER -- Licensed Civil Engineer experienced
in soil mechanics (also see Geotechnical Engineer).
2.37 STABILIZATION FILL -- A fill mass, the configuration
of which is typically related to slope height and is
specified by the standards of practice for enhancing
the stability of locally adverse conditions. A
stabilization fill is normally specified by minimum
key width and depth and by maximum backcut angle. A
stabilization fill mayor may not have a backdrainage
system specified.
2.38 SUBDRAIN -- Generally a pipe and gravel or similar
drainage system placed beneath a fill in the alignment
of canyons or former drainage channels.
2~39 SLOUGH -- Loose, noncompacted fill material generated
during grading operations.
2.40 TAILINGS -- Nonengineered fill which accumulates on or
adjacent to equipment haul-roads.
2.41 TERRACE -- Relatively level step constructed in the
face of graded slope surface for drainage control and
maintenance purposes.
2.42 TOPSOIL -- The presumably fertile upper zone of soil
which is usually darker in color and loose.
2.43 WINDROW -- A string of large rock buried within
engineered fill in accordance with guidelines set
forth by the Geotechnical Consultant.
3. SITE PREPARATION
3.1 Clearing and grubbing should consist of the removal of
vegetation such as brush, grass, woods, stumps, trees,
roots to trees and otherwise deleterious natural
materials from the areas to be graded. Clearing and
grubbing should extend to the outside of all proposed
excavation and fill areas.
3.2 Demolition should include removal of buildings, struc-
tures, foundations, reservoirs, utilities (including
underground pipelines, septic tanks, leach fields,
seepage pits, cisterns, mining shafts, tunnels, etc.)
and other man-made surface and subsurface improvements
J1A-J,L//
...
Standard Guidelines
for Grading Projects
3.3
4.
Page 6
...
...
from the areas to be graded. Demolition of utilities
should include proper capping and/or re-routing pipe-
lines at the project perimeter and cutoff and capping
of wells in accordance with the requirements of the
governing authorities and the recommendations of the
Geotechnical Consultant at the time of demolition.
...
..,
Debris generated during clearing. grubbing and/or
demolition operations should be wasted from areas to
be graded and disposed off-site. Clearing. grubbing
and demolition operations should be performed under
the observation of the Geotechnical Consultant.
...
4.1
SITE PROTECTION
-j
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.~
The Contractor should be responsible for the stability
of all temporary excavations. Recommendations by the
Geotechnical Consultant pertaining to temporary
excavations (e.g.. backcuts) are made in consideration
of stability of the completed project and. therefore,
should not be considered to preclude the responsibil-
ities of the Contractor. Recommendations by the
Geotechnical Consultant should not be considered to
preclude more restrictive requirements by the
regulating agencies.
...
-
~
Precautions should be taken during the performance of
site clearing. excavations and grading to protect the
work site from flooding. ponding or inundation by poor
or improper surface drainage. Temporary provisions
should be made during the rainy season to adequately
direct surface drainage away from and off the work
site.
...
...
-
During periods of rainfall. the Geotechnical
Consultant should be kept informed by the Contractor
as to the nature of remedial or preventative work
being performed (e.g., pumping. placement of sandbags
or plastic sheeting, other labor. dozing, etc.).
...
Following periods of rainfall, the Contractor should
contact the Geotechnical Consultant and arrange a
review of the site in order to visually assess rain
related damage. The Geotechnical Consultant may also
recommend excavations and testing in order to aid in
his assessments.
...
...
Rain related damage should be considered to include,
but may not be limited to, erosion, silting,
saturation, swelling, structural distress and other
adverse conditions identified by the Geotechnical
...
-
/0/1) - 3~.2- ...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Standard Guidelines
for Grading Projects
Page 7
Consultant. Soil adversely affected should be
classified as Unsuitable Materials and should be
subject to overexcavation and replacement with
compacted fill or other remedial 'grading as
recommended by the Geotechnical Consultant.
5. EXCAVATIONS
5.1 UNSUITABLE MATERIALS
5.1.1 Materials which are unsuitable should be
excavated under observation and recommendations
of the Geotechnical Consultant. Unsuitable
materials include. but may not be limited to,
dry. loose. soft. wet. organic compressible
natural soils and fractured. weathered, soft
bedrock and nonengineered or otherwise
deleterious fill materials.
5.1.2 Material identified by the Geotechnical
Con~ultant as unsatisfactory due to its
moisture conditions should be overexcavated.
watered or dried. as needed. and thoroughly
blended to a uniform near optimum moisture
condition (as per guidelines reference 7.2.1)
prior to placement as compacted fill.
5.2 CUT SLOPES
5.2.1 Unless otherwise recommended by the Geotech-
nical Consultant and approved by the regulating
agencies. permanent cut slopes should not be
steeper than 2:1 (horizontal:vertical).
5.2.2 If excavations for cut slopes expose loose.
cohesionless. significantly fractured or
otherwise unsuitable material. overexcavation
and replacement of the unsuitable materials
with a compacted stabilization fill should be
accomplished as recommended by the Geotechnical
Consultant. Unless otherwise specified by the
Geotechnical Consultant. stabilization fill
construction should conform to the requirements
of the Standard Details.
5.2.3 The Geotechnical Consultant should review cut
slopes during excavation. The Geotechnical
Consultant should be notified by the contractor
prior to beginning slope excavations.
J11/J ~ Jl/:3
.till':
Standard Guidelines
for Grading Projects
Page 8
...
...
5.2.4 If, during the course of grading, adverse or
potentially adverse geotechnical conditions are
encountered which were not anticipated in the
preliminary report, the Geotechnical Consultant
should explore, analyze and make recommen-
dations to treat these problems.
-
-
6. COMPACTED FILL
All fill materials should be compacted to at least 90
percent of maximum density (ASTM 01557) unless otherwise
recommended by the Geotechnical Consultant.
...
6.1 PLACEMENT
..
6.1.1 Prior to placement of compacted fill, the
Contractor should request a review by the
Geotechnical Consultant of the exposed ground
surface. Unless otherwise recommended, the
exposed ground surface should then be scarified
(6-inches minimum), watered or dried as needed,
thoroughly blended to achieve near optimum
moisture conditions, then thoroughly compacted
to a minimum of 90 percent of the maximum
density.
6.1.2 Compacted fill should be placed in thin
horizontal lifts. Each lift should be watered
or dried as needed, blended to achieve near
optimum moisture conditions then compacted by
mechanical methods to a minimum of 90 percent
of laboratory maximum dry density. Each lift
should be treated in a like manner until the
desired finished grades are achieved.
6.1.3 When placing fill in horizontal lifts adjacent
to areas sloping steeper than 5:1 (horizontal:
vertical), horizontal keys and vertical benches
should be excavated into the adjacent slope
area. Keying and benching should be sufficient
to provide at least 6-foot wide benches and a
minimum of 4-feet of vertical bench height
within the firm natural ground, firm bedrock or
engineered compacted fill. No compacted fill
should be placed in an area subsequent to
keying and benching until the area has been
reviewed by the Geotechnical Consultant.
Material generated by the benching operation
should be moved suffiCiently away from the
bench area to allow for the recommended review
of the horizontal bench prior to placement
...
...
...
-
..
...
...
...
-
...
-
/YIlJ Ji/L( ...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Standard Guidelines
for Grading Projects
Palle 9
fill. Typical keyinll and benchinll details have
been included within the accompanying Standard
Details.
6.1.4 Within a single fill area where grading
procedures dictate two or more separate fills,
temporary slopes (false slopes) may be created.
When placing fill adjacent to a false slope,
benching should be conducted in the same manner
as above described. At least a 3-foot vertical
bench should be established within the firm
core adjacent approved compacted fill prior to
placement of additional fill. Benchinll should
proceed in at least 3-foot vertical increments
until the desired finished grades are achieved.
6.1.5 Fill should be tested for compliance with the
recommended relative compaction and moisture
conditions. Field density testing should
conform to accepted test methods. Density
testing frequency should be adequate for the
geotechnical consultant to provide professional
opinions regardings fill compaction and
adherence to recommendations. Fill found not
to be in conformance with the grading
recommendation should be removed or otherwise
handled as recommended by the Geotechnical
Consultant.
6.1.6 The Contractor should assist the Geotechnical
Consultant and/or his representative by diggin~
test pits for removal determinations and/or for
testing compacted fill.
6.1.7 As recommended by the Geotechnical Consultant,
the Contractor may need to remove grading
equipment from an area being tested if
personnel safety is considered to be a problem.
6.2 MOISTURE
6.2.1 For field testing purposes "near optimum"
moisture will vary with material type and other
factors including compaction procedure. "Near
optimum" may be specifically recommended in
Preliminary Investigation Reports and/or may be
evaluated during grading.
6.2.2 Prior to placement of additional compacted fill
following an overnight or other grading delay,
the exposed surface or previously compacted
p! Il -- ]L-/5
...
Standard Guidelines
for Grading Projects
Pall;e 10
-
fill should "be processed "by scarification,
watered or dried as needed, thoroughly blended
to near-optimum moisture conditions, then
recompacted to a minimum of 90 percent of
laboratory maximum dry density. Where wet,
dry, or other unsuitable materials exist to
depths of greater than one foot, the unsuitable
materials should be overexcavated.
-
-
"-
6.2.3 Following a period of flooding, rainfall or
overwatering by other means, no additional fill
should be placed until damall;e assessments have
been made and remedial grading performed as
described under Section 5.6 herein.
...
..
6.3 FILL MATERIAL
6.3.1 Excavated on-site materials which are
considered suitable to the Geotechnical
Consultant may be utilized as compacted fill,
provided trash, vegetation and other
deleterious materials are removed prior to
placement.
6.3.2 Where import fill materials are required for
use on-site, the Geotechnical Consultant should
be notified in advance of importing, in order
to sample and test materials from proposed
borrow sites. No import fill materials should
be delivered for use on-site without prior
samplinll; and testinll; notification by
Geotechnical Consultant.
...
-
...
...
"'I
6.3.3 Where oversized rock or similar irreducible
material is generated during gradinll;, it is
recommended, where practical, to waste such
material off-site or on-site in areas
designated as "nonstructural rock disposal
areas". Rock placed in disposal areas should
be placed with sufficient fines to fill
voids. The rock should be compacted in lifts
to an unyieldinll; condition. The disposal area
should be covered with at least three feet of
compacted fill which is free of oversized
material. The upper three feet should be
placed in accordance with the guidelines for
compacted fill herein.
-
-
...
...
6.3.4 Rocks 12 inches in maximum dimension and
smaller may be utilized within the compacted
fill, provided they are placed in such a manner
"'"
...
/2/Il-':Y/~
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Standard Guidelines
for Grading Projects
Pa~e 11
that nesting of the rock is avoided. Fill
should be placed and thoroughly compacted over
and around all rock. The amount of rock should
not exceed 4U percent by dry weight retained on
the 3/4-inch sieve size. The 12-inch and 4U
percent recommendations herein may vary as
field conditions dictate.
6.3.5 Where rocks or similar irreducible materials of
~reater than 12 inches but less than four feet
of maximum dimension are generated during
grading, or otherwise desired to be placed
within an engineered fill, special handling in
accordance with the accompanyin~ Standard
Details is recommended. Rocks greater than
four feet should be broken down or disposed
off-site. Rocks up to four feet maximum
dimension should be placed below the upper 10
feet of any fill and should not be closer than
20-feet to any slope face. These recommen-
dations could vary as locations of improvements
dictate. Where practical, oversized material
should not be placed below areas where
structures or deep utilities are proposed.
Oversized material should be placed in windrows
on a clean, overexcavated or unyielding
compacted fill or firm natural ground surface.
Select native or imported granular soil (S.E.
30 or higher) should be placed and thorou~hly
flooded over and around all windrowed rock,
such that voids are filled. Windrows of
oversized material should be staggered so that
successive strata of oversized material are not
in the same vertical plane.
6.3.6 It may be possible to dispose of individual
larger rock as field conditions dictate and as
recommended by the Geotechnical Consultant at
the time of placement.
6.3.7 The construction of a "rock fill" consistin~
primarily of rock fragments up to two feet in
maximum dimension with little soil material may
be feasible. Such material is typically
generated on sites where extensive blasting is
required. Recommendations for construction of
rock fills should be provided by the
Geotechnical Consultant on a site-specific
basis. .
pi/) - ;17
Standard Guidelines
for Grading Projects
Page 12
6.3.8 During grading operations, placing and mixing
the materials from the cut and/or borrow areas
may result in soil mixtures which possess
unique physical properties. Testing may be
required of samples obtained directly from the
fill areas in order to determine conformance
with the specifications. Processing of these
additional samples may take two or more working
days. The Contractor may elect to move the
operation to other areas within the project, or
may continue placing compacted fill pending
laboratory and field test results. Should he
elect the second alternative, fill placed is
done so at the Contractor's risk.
6.3.9 Any fill placed in areas not previously
reviewed and evaluated by the Geotechnical
Consultant may require removal and recom-
paction. Determination of overexcavations
should be made upon review of field conditions
by the Geotechnical Consultant.
6.4 FILL SLOPES
6.4.1 Permanent fill slopes should not be constructed
steeper than 2:1 (horizontal to vertical),
unless otherwise recommended by the Geotech-
nical Consultant and approved by the regulating
agencies.
6.4.2 Fill slopes should be compacted in accordance
with these grading guidelines and specific
report recommendations. Two methods of slope
compaction are typically utilized in mass
grading, lateral over-building and cutting back,
and mechanical compaction to grade (i.e.
sheepsfoot roller backrolling). Constraints
such as height of slope, fill soil type, access,
property lines, and available equipment will
influence the method of slope construction and
compaction. The geotechnical consultant should
be notified by the contractor what method will
be employed prior to slope construction.
Slopes utilizing over-building and cutting back
should be constructed utilizing horizontal fill
lifts (reference Section 6) with compaction
equipment workin!1; as close to the edge as prac-
tical. The amount of lateral over-building will
vary as field conditions dictiate. Compaction
testing of slope faces will be required and
)I//?- JL/~.
..
....
-
-
-
-
..
....
....
...
""\
....
....
....
...
-
...
....
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Standard Guidelines
for Grading Projects
Page 13
reconstruction of the slope may result if
testing does not meet our recommendations.
Mechanical compaction of the slope to grade
during construction should utilize two types of
compactive effort. First, horizontal fill lifts
.should be compacted during fill placement. This
equipment should provide compactive effort to
the outer edge of the fill slope. Sloughing of
fill soils should not be permitted to drift down
the slope. Secondly, at intervals not exceeding
four feet in vertical slope height or the
capability of available equipment, whichever is
less, fill slopes should be backrolled with a
sheepsfoot-type roller. Moisture conditions of
the slope fill soils should be maintained
throughout the compaction process. Generally
upon slope completion, the entire slope should
be compacted utilizing typical methods, (i.e.
sheepsfoot rolling, bulldozer tracking, or
rolling with rubber-tired heavy equipment).
Slope construction grade staking should be
removed as soon as possible in the slope
compaction process. Final slope compaction
should be performed without grade sakes on the
slope face.
In order to monitor slope construction
procedures, moisture and density tests will be
taken at regular intervals. Failure to achieve
the desired results will likely result in a
recommendation by the Geotechnical Consultant
to overexcavate the slope surfaces followed by
reconstruction of the slopes utilizing over-
filling and cutting back procedures or further
compactive effort with the conventional
backrolling approach. Other recommendations
may also be provided which would be
commensurate with field conditions.
6.4.3 Where placement of fill above a natural slope
or above a cut slope is proposed, the fill
slope configuration as presented in the
accompanying Standard Details should be
adopted.
6.4.4 For pad areas above fill slopes, positive
drainage should be established away from the
top-of-slope, as designed by the project civil
engineer.
j~fl~]L/7
....
Standard Guidelines
for Grading Projects
Page 14
...
6.5
OFF-SITE FILL
-
6.5.1 Off-site fill should be treated in the same
manner as recommended in the specifications for
site preparation, excavation, drains,
compaction, etc.
...
6.5.2 Off-site canyon fill should be placed in
preparation for future additional fill, as
shown in the accompanying Standard Details.
6.5.3 Off-site fill subdrains temporarily terminated
(up canyon) should be surveyed for future
relocation and connection.
-
-
...
6.6 TRENCH BACKFILL
6.6.1 Utility trench backfill should, unless other-
wise recommended, be compacted by mechanical
means. Unless otherwise recommended, the
degree of compaction should be a minimum of 90
percent of maximum density (ASTM D1557).
6.6.2 Backfill of exterior and interior trenches
extending below a 1:1 projection from the outer
edge of foundations should be mechanically
compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the
laboratory maximum density.
-
...
..
"'I
6.6.3 Within slab areas, but outside the influence of
foundations, trenches up to one foot wide and
two feet deep may be backfilled with sand (S.E.
> 30), and consolidated by jetting, flooding or
by mechanical means. If on-site materials are
utilized, they should be wheel-rolled, tamped
or otherwise compacted to a firm condition.
For minor interior trenches, density testing
may be deleted or spot testing may be elected
if deemed necessary. based on review of
backfill operations during construction.
""l
..
...
6.6.4 If utility contractors indicate that it is
undesirable to use compaction equipment in
close proximity to a buried conduit, the
Contractor may elect the utilization of light
weight mechanical compaction equipment and/or
shading of the conduit with clean, granular
material, (S.E. > 30) which should be
thoroughly moistened in the trench, prior to
..
...
-
...
FlfJ- J50
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Standard Guidelines
for Grading Projects
Page 15
. initiating mechanical compaction procedures.
Other methods of utility trench compaction may
also be appropriate, upon review of the
Geotechnical Consultant at the time of
construction.
6.6.5 In cases where clean granular materials are
proposed for use in lieu of native materials or
where flooding or jetting is proposed, the
procedures should be considered subject to
review by the Geotechnical Consultant.
6.6.6 Clean granular backfill and/or bedding are not
recommended in slope areas unless provisions
are made for a drainage system to mitigate the
potential build-up of seepage forces and
piping.
7. DRAINAGE
7~1 Canyon subdrain systems recommended by the
Geotechnical Consultant should be installed in
accordance with the Standard Details.
7.2 Typical subdrains for compacted fill buttresses, slope
stabilizations or sidehill masses, should be installed
in accordance with the specifications of the
accompanying Standard Details.
7.3 Roof, pad and slope drainage should be directed away
from slopes and areas of structures to disposal areas
via suitable devices designed by the project civil
engineer (i.e., gutters, downspouts, concrete swales,
area drains, earth swales, etc.).
7.4 Drainage patterns established at the time of fine
grading should be maintained throughout the life of
the project. Property owners should be made aware
that altering drainage patterns can be detrimental to
slope stability and foundation performance.
8. SLOPE MAINTENANCE
8.1 LANDSCAPE PLANTS
In order to decrease erosion surficial slope stability
problems, slope planting should be accomplished at the
completion of grading. Slope planting should consist
of deep-rooting vegetation requiring little watering.
A Landscape Architect would be the test party to
consult regarding actual types of plants and planting
configuration.
11~/35/
...
Standard Guidelines
for Grading Projects
Page 16
...
...
8.2 IRRIGATION
...
8.2.1 Slope irrigation should be minimized. If
automatic timing devices are utilized on
irrigation systems, provisions should be made
for interrupting normal irrigation during
periods of rainfall.
8.2.2 Property owners should be made aware that
overwatering of slopes is detrimental to slope
stability and may contribute to slope seepage,
erosion and siltation problems in the
subdivision.
...
...
...
..
...
...
"'I
...
...
...
..
...
"'I
Rev 5/88
"'"
Jt/I? ~ 35')
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
MIN.1
4" DIAMETER PERFORATED
PIPE BACl(DRAIN
4" DIAMETER NON-PERFORATED
PIPE LATERAL DRAIN
SLOPE PER PLAN
H/2
PROVIDE BACKDRAIN PER BACK DRAIN
DETAIL. AN ADDITIONAL BACK DRAIN
AT MID-SLOPE WILL BE REQUIRED FOR
SLOPE IN EXCESS OF 40 FEET HIGH.
KEY-DIMENSIONSPER SOILS ENGINEER
TYPICAL BUTTRESS OR ST ABILlZA TJON FILL DETAIL
DATE: FIGURE:
JI//} ~ 333
NATURAL GROUND
'"
"'"
""-
. .
PLAN'; . . .
....OF ...
WIE04IC;"is.s.
PROVIDE BACKDRAIN PER
BACKDRAIN DETAIL. AN
ADDITIONAL BACK DRAIN
AT MID-SLOPE WILL BE
REQUIRED FOR BACK
SLOPES IN EXCESS OF
..0 FEET HIGH. LOCA-
TIONS.OF BACKDRAINS
AND OUTLETS PER SOILS
ENGINEER ANDIOR EN-
GINEERING GEOLOGIST
DURING GRADING.
...
-
...
-
PROPOSED GRADING
...
...
...
...
COMPACTED FILL
...
...
PL04NE OF. . . .
WIE04ICNESS.
...
BASE WIDTH 'w' DETERMINED
BY SOILS ENGINEER
...
...
...
...
...
'"'I
JOB
TYPICAL SHEAR KEY DETAIL
DATE:
...
F( fJ -' J IL/ ...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
OVEREXCAVATE
FINAL LIMIT OF
EXCAVATION
DAYLIGHT
LINE
OVEREXCAVATE
3' AND REPLACE
WITH COMPACTED
FILL
~
~ ~
SOUND BEDROCK
TYPICAL BENCHING
OVERBUROEN
(CREEP-PRONE)
PROVIDE BACK DRAIN PER BACK DRAIN
DETAIL. LOCATION OF BACK DRAIN AND
OUTLETS PER SOILS ENGINEER AND/OR
ENGINEERING GEOLOGIST DURING
GRADING
EQUIPMENT WIDTH (MINIMUM 15')
JOB NO.:
DAYLIGHT SHEAR KEY DETAIL
DATE:
1
It//J ~ 35~
....
-
BENCHING FILL OVER NATURAL
SURFACE OF FIRM
EARTH MATERIAL
..
....
----
~~~
---.:: ,,61..E
:...---.:-;: >IE IlM~ 4' TYPICAL
C:l' MIN. "E~
~ ~
__ ~ ---=:: 10'
TYPICAL
~10' MIN. (INCLINED 2~ MIN. INTO SLOPE)
....
..
..
..
-
BENCHING FILL OVER CUT
..
FINISH CUT
SLOPE
SURFACE OF FIRM
EARTH MATERIAL
FINISH FILL SLOPE
..
.,
....
-
---
----
10'
TYPICAL
-
..
IS' MIN. OR STABILITY EQUIVALENT PER SOIL
ENGINEERING (INCLINED 2~ MIN. INTO SLOPE)
....
~
JOB NO~
BENCHING FOR COMPACTED FILL DETAIL
DATE:
FIGURE:
....
4
JL-/f) ~') 5?
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
FINISH SURFACE SLOPE
3 FT3 MINIMUM PER LINE"L FOOT
APPROVED FILTER ROCK*
COMPACTED FILL
A
- 2.. MINIMUM GRADIENT
A
~" MINIMUM DIAMETER
SOLID OUTLET PIPE
SPACED PER SOIL
ENGINEER REQUIRE-
MENTS DURING GRADING
12" MINIMUM COVER
~. MINIMUM APPROVED
PERFORATED PIPE**
(PERFORATIONS DOWN)
MINIMUM 2.. GRADIENT
TO OUTLET
BENCH INCLINED TOWARD
DRAIN
. TYPICAL BENCHING
DETAIL A-A
TEMPORARY FILL LEVEL
~" MINIMUM DIAMETER
APPROVED SOLID
OUTLET PIPE
COMPACTED
BACKFILL
I
12" MINIMUMJ
*FILTER ROCK TO MEET FOLLOWING
SPECIFICATIONS OR APPROVED EQUAL:
SIEVE PERCENTAGE PASSING
1" 100
3/~" 80-100
3/S" ~0-100
NO.~ 25-~0
NO.30 5-15
NO.50 0-7
NO.200 0-3
**APPROVED PIPE TYPE:
SCHEDULE ~O POLYVINYL CHLORIDE
(P.V.C.) OR APPROVED EQUAL.
MINIMUM CRUSH STRENGTH 1000 PSI.
JOB NO.:
TYPICAL BACKDRAIN DETAIL
DATE:
)tj/}- J57
...
-
...
FINISH SURFACE SLOPE
MINIMUM 3 FT3 PER LINEAL FOOT
OPEN GRADED AGGREGATE*
...
TAPE AND SEAL AT CONTACT
...
COMPACTED FILL
...
...
A
TYPICAL
BENCHING
SUPAC S-P FABRIC OR
APPROVED EOUAL
4" MINIMUM APPROVED
PERFORATED PIPE
(PERFORATIONS DOWN)
MINIMUM 2.. GRADIENT
TO OUTLET
BENCH INCLINED
TOWARD DRAIN
...
2..
GRADIENT
4" MINIMUM DIAMETER
SOLID OUTLET PIPE
SPACED PER SOIL
ENGINEER REQUIREMENTS
...
...
...
DETAIL A-A
TEMPORARY FILL LEVEL
...
COMPACTED
MINIMUM BACKFILL
12" COVER
-,l
MINIMUM 4" DIAMETER APPROVED
SOLID OUTLET PIPE
...
...
It--1Z---1
1 MINIMUM 'I
-
* NOTE: AGGREGATE TO MEET FOLLOWING
SPECIFICATIONS OR APPROVED EQUAL:
...
SIEVE SIZE
1 l/Z-
1-
3/4-
3/S-
NO. ZOO
PERCENTAGE PASSING
100
5-40
0-17
0-7
0-3
...
...
BACKDRAIN DETAIL (GEOFABRIC)
DATE:
FIGURE:
...
6
If//- )5'f{ ...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
CANYON SUB DRAIN DETAILS
fSURFACE OF
FIRM EARTH
---
................ ../
....... ", / '" /'
,,'\ COMPACTED FILL / /
\ /
\\ / /
\ " // /
,_../
~ /
TYPICAL BENCHING
REMOVE UNSUITABLE
MATERIAL
SEE DETAILS BELOW
INCLINE TOWARD DRAIN
TRENCH DETAIL
8~INIMUM
OVERLAP
-MINIMUM 8 FT3 PER LINEAL
FOOT OF APPROVED DRAIN
MATERIAL
OPTIONAL V-DITCH DETAIL
SUPAC S-P FABRIC OR
APPROVED EQUAL
SUPAC 8-P FABRIC
OR APPROVED EQUAL
f 24' t
MINIMUM
DRAIN MATERIAL SHOULD
CONSIST OF MINUS '.5',
MINUS ,', OR MINUS .75'
CRUSHED ROCK
24'
MINIMUM
MINIMUM 8 FT3 PER LINEAL FOOT
OF APPROVED DRAIN MATERIAL
ADD MINIMUM 4' DIAMETER
APPROVED PERFORATED
PIPE WHEN LARGE FLOWS
ARE ANTICIPATED
APPROVED PIPE TO BE
SCHEDULE 40 POLY-VINYL-
CHLORIDE (P.V.C.> OR
APPROVED EQUAL. MINIMUM
CRUSH STRENGTH '000 pai.
JOB NO.:
GEOFABRIC SUBDRAIN
DATE:
FIGURE:
7
Ji4- 357
...
1
...
FINAL GRADE
...
...
TOE OF SLOPE SHOWN
ON GRADING PLAN
...
FILL .-
.-
. -
.-
.-
--
FILL _--
.-
_-- O'laO) -:""
_- ~f'a"'__
_-- ",,,,'ta"'\"'':._--
-- 't\'\ -
- a"''''.--
.- a -
.-- ~ ",9\. _
.- u\' -
- u"& - 10' TYPICAL BENCH
-- -- WIDTH VARIEB
- --
--- -' / ..",.."
.- A' _--
/, --
--
--
...
...
..
...
5'"
-
COMPETENT EARTH
MATERIAL
...
...
MINIMUM BASE KEY WIDTH {
TYPICAL BENCH
HEIGHT
...
LIMIT OF KEY
EXCAVATION
PROVIDE BACKDRAIN AS
REQUIRED PER RECOM-
MENDATIONS OF SOILS
ENGINEER DURING GRADING
-"!
...
...
WHERE NATURAL SLOPE GRADIENT IS 5:1 OR LESS.
BENCHING IS NOT NECESSARY. HOWEVER. FILL IS
NOT TO BE PLACED ON COMPRESSIBLE OR UNSUIT-
ABLE MATERIAL.
...
...
...
FILL SLOPE ABOVE NATURAL GROUND DETAIL
JOB NO.:
DATE:
FIGURE:
...
8
;(///3ttJ
...
W
0
I <
~
w...
CII:
I ......
\ ......
\ <0
:z:
\ CII~
I -r ZZ Cl)
\ \ 0... OW
\ ... -~
... < W< ~W
\ '" \ < u >- a:u
~ \ 2 i: Oa: 0<
I ... ... a:w ......
\ \ \ ...~ w'"
... ~ ...<
\ ~ \ ~ <2 "'0
... \ \ . 0 O~
... - a:z ..
I \~ :.+ 00 ;a: w
... ~~ a:
\ ~ \ lO:~ ..J::l
u< ::la: -<:I
\ "0 \ 00 u... c(-
a:z III 1-'"
I \ ~ \ o::l ~ W
\ ~ \ wO 0 0
\ ~ \ CII'" z
. w
I \ -; \ c..
\::, 0
\ .. \ ..J
\~ en
I \ ; \ T I- 0
\ 0 \ Cl)
::;) Cl)
\ cI) \ (,) .-
'5\ 2 ~
I \ "" \ ::l W
~ > <
\ \ ~
z 0 z
\ \ 2 co <
\ ..,
I \ .. c(
\ \ w
\ c..
I \ 0
..J w
~
\ en <
0
\ ..J
I 2 \ ..J
::l \ Ll-
z
> ~ \
::l Z
I "'2 0 ~ \
"'0 :z: 0 \ .
Oa: CII w
:c ...
u... "'z CII \ 0
.;... u< ... \ ...
I -< <... U CII
0- ...... \
CIIa: z < ...
0<:1 .... (\ ~
...w z...
0'" U! 0'"
I ...< ...0 u;
2 ...<
:a..z -a: ...C11
<w~ ~<:I ...' ... \
_CII ...< \
w... ... "'< <a:
I wa:_ ::lZ ~. a:1II \
>uCII uo ~z ..
o z e~ \ 0
20< UO
wza: <0 Z
a:<... z... CII
I 0
~
I Jt!/J ~ 3/c(
I
~
GENERAL GRADING RECOMMENDATIONS
...
CUT LOT
...
--
--
--
-
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
--
-- TOPSOIL. COLLUVIUM AND _
WEATHERED BEDROCK _-
--
--
--
_---ORIGINAL
- GROUND
...
...
5'
""I
3'
--
--
--
--
-- UNWEATHERED BEDROCK
-
OVEREXCAVATE AND
REGRADE
...
...
...
CUT/FILL LOT (TRANSITION)
...,
...
--
--
- ,,"
-- "
-- "
_ ORIGINAL
_-- _ GROUND
- - .
--"
...
COMPACTED FILL
--
"
...,
-
--
---
--
--
--
-- -
TOPSOIL. ,,"
_COLLUVIUM AND "
WEATHERED " .
BEDROCK ---
,,--
,,"
3'
...-
"
-
--
...
OVEREXCAVATE AND
REGRADE
UNWEATHERED BEDROCK
...
...
JOB
TRANSITION LOT DETAIL
DATE:
FIGURE:
10
~
/ L-/4_ ]/t?..2
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
BUILDING
1
FINISHED GRADE
CLEAR AREA FOR
FOUNDATION, UTILITIES,
AND SWIMMING POOLS
SLOPE FACE
0"'-
o~
0 0
0 o-g 01' 15' -F
~WINDROW
STREET
"'-
5' OR BELOW DEPTH OF
DEEPEST UTILITY TRENCH
(WHICHEVER GREATER)
TYPICAL WINDROW DETAIL (EDGE VIEW)
GRANULAR SOIL FLOODED
TO FILL VOIDS
HORIZONTALLY PLACED
COMPACTION FILL
PROFILE VIEW
JOB NO.:
ROCK DISPOSAL DETAIL
DATE:
FIGURE:
1
F14- 3k}
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX G
SOAKA WAY BASIN CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT
It//} , JbL(
I
I
United States Olympic Rowing Team Boathouse Project
Soakaway Basin Conceptual Design Report
I
United States Olympic Training Center
I
I
'.....
-\
~ ~"""
~ ~~
.{ ~,~"'-- - .
'{~3tt ;:;:;>'-:1
, ~ <~~~!t'.;}.. ,,"-.-"-j
~ J. I ~~_"i"_';~~ (:,-<d .
- ,w.",_~,.,.~.:'~::.,~~_; ,~;-_<,;-~.,.". .,' ";:':' ~_F'_~7;'~:~ Y?~''''-'m~....~9"''f1"'!f~ri1i;:~'''~~;'~:;x!-.~ ,.<<'~i':W'o.'-:~.' ,~
. . 7'1","",; -,.~>,( '.-""'~:Ifr~'''?:~:''''''''~~";""""",,',,,,,, '-1
__'._h__ _ .,l_~ ~_",,~~~;i;_::.~t~,4~~.' '::J.:'~~;~';1.i.'i,;ik,\>.'.:.'.'...'~':;>~' ___.f
;"f_'";,'~';l
,
'"
'J
I ~".'."..i";' _"_'.'.-..'.'~.'J
1 -..1"'. ;~?~'~.:: -- --'
,-;6.~;~,:t~~"" ;i
. _44"~-""-'>4.i
~ ::.~r:~c':'':' ~ "j
4 .-'if. -! - ._,'
_ _._._~:t:' '~I~' g
"- 7'~~..-.- ,~.,.~.., IT" J ,..',
.._~.~.-='=~::~':~~_:;__. __'B:i~~t~tL~=:'~..:;:~-J
!
i
~
}t
~t.
~.
.",
{:i
~
~:"'~ ~~
\{~~~,~
~,.;!~,::;1
~~l
..",- -1
..1
~
. j
I
i*.J1;l~~z~~'~~i'~~~1:;~~1~;r~~~:::" ~
".c,,".il..' I. ............ t""",.. ,C'",
~:~:,:~7 ~~~~~
r'1';'~ ~iPf~;~.~:J4.;>
~"i~ A'~~ ,
~:F~:~~-:f(:+~r . ,!
~r-"~ ~ tf".r"l._:;;.".#
~,,-<.."'" ~"...,.~:,.:,~
f''j-- ". ..<11 ,t~~~ I
.J: it.;~~~ I
~;('~'~;-F;1 I ~
:~~:;,::~;~~~t~$/ ,~ ---:rr~l~'
". '- --"1 ~""""': 'q' k.'-'.' >,',
?,'} ~f:'j' lj ~'lfl
~~~11~ .~~~i - if4:iS~~
~, "...,} f',fillltfl., .
a;;;;p:';i; I ,J?":; I
~"._"~'t\;.::>?~ ,- :iK<?~~ ~
I, ,.:t~~ -'1"?!i~~1';'-'
"c'~ ,<>,"/ I
,"~ 'J "\'{.y
,
,
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-..\
_;.v-~'
,
;~
I
--"...
"';:;.~~
,-4
I
...:l-....~~.,
~o;;C_",......______, ."",_..._
_.-.
I
i:-..".,....,_
.... ~." .~. ~ '"",- ,"",.,--..
I
...,,'~ ,.,
~-
__.~'-'_'_'___. ........-.... -r ,.--.,
t-' /--,""""'
. ' :.\
..........-- '--' -'- >(
,,-
I
I
)i4-)b~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
UNITED STATES OLYMPIC ROWING TEAM BOATHOUSE PROJECT
SOAKAWAY BASIN CONCEPTUAL DESIGN REPORT
UNITED STATES OLYMPIC TRAINING CENTER
Job Number 10839-I
October 24, 1991
Prepared By:
RICK ENGINEERING COMPANY
WATER RESOURCES DIVISION
5620 FRIARS ROAD
SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92110-2596
(619) 291-0707>
)i4~ 3/,,/'
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
INTRODUCTION . . . . . .
URBAN RUNOFF MANAGEMENT
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
MAINTENANCE
1
3
4
6
FIGURES:
1. Vicinity Map . . . . . . .
2. Modified Cleanout Cross-section "A-A"
3. Modified Cleanout Cross-Section "C-C"
4. Infiltration/Basin Section "B-B". . .
2
7
8
9
MAP POCKET:
1. Conceptual Grading & Utilities Plan .
J1/J-:;1P7
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
INTRODUCTION
Plans for the development of the United States Olympic Training
Center call for the construction of a boathouse east of Wueste
Road, along the western shore of the Lower Otay Reservoir (see
Figure 1). In addition to the boathouse, the proposed project
consists of a concrete deck surrounding the building, a
decomposed granite surface access road and parking lot, and
underground utilities, including sewer, water and stormdrain.
Development of the project site opens the potential for
pollutants to be conveyed through the stormdrain to the lake.
To help prevent degradation of water quality in this domestic
water supply reservoir, the City of San Diego Public Utilities
Department has requested that measures be taken to remove
potential pollutants from runoff before it is discharged into the
lake. For this purpose, an infiltration basin ("soakaway basin")
is proposed as part of the storm drain system. It is intended to
mitigate the impacts of the "urbanized" runoff by filtering
stormwater runoff to remove pollutants prior to discharge to the
Lower otay Reservoir.
The purpose of this report is to briefly
which contaminants become a problem as a
and to describe the conceptual design
proposed system.
review the process by
result of development
and function of the
1
/!(4~3 ~i
.p"
.~;
...
~ ".
.
'!ltr~
I
I ,~
I '
"1'''SAHTE?
..
I
"'"
...
.....
...
~
...
IS
..,
..
-
....
I
I
I
I
I
NO SCALE
I
.'
;.
..,
.:
~
.,
"III)
...
'"
FIGURE 1
VICINITY MAP
...
~ RI(J(~~G COMI'.....'lY
r.~. __
~ :;,. ---.--
...
) '1.4- 3(//
...
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
URBAN RUNOFF MANAGEMENT
Pollutants accumulate on impervious sufaces during dry periods.
Pollutants Generally consist of sediment, contaminated windborne
dust, petroleum drippings from automobiles and trucks, wear
particles from tires and brake linings, fertilizers, pesticides,
paints, solvents and simple litter. These pollutants are washed
from the impervious surfaces by rainfall and "nuisance" runoff
(car and/or boat washing, excess irrigation, etc.). It has been
found that the great majority of the accumulated contaminants are
removed from the impervious surfaces during a storm event which
generates approximately one-half inch of runoff from the
impervious area. This mobilization and transport of contaminants
during the first one-half inch of runoff is frequently referred
to as the "first flush." storm runoff in excess of one-half inch
from the impervious surfaces is comparatively free of urban
pollution.
Infiltration basins which collect and filter the first flush are
effective for the removal of both soluble and fine particulate
pollutants. Large particles are best allowed to settle out of
the stormwater before reaching the filtration portion of the
basin. Fine particulates, to which organic hydrocarbons (e.g.
petroleum products) tend to adhere, settle or are strained and
trapped in the filter medium. Soluble chemicals can precipitate
as well as being absorbed wi thin the filter soil and can be
degraded and or transformed by bacterial action. Living plants,
by drawing water and nutrients into themselves, incorporate
soluble contaminants into their cell material.
3
It//? ,370
...
~
CONCEPTUAL DESIGN
...
The proposed soakaway basin will be designed to capture the first
flush, corresponding to one-half inch of runoff from the
impervious areas. Based on a commercial runoff coefficient of
0.95, 0.53 inches of rainfall generates one-half inch of runoff
from the impervious areas. The 6-hour storm precipitation of
0.53 inches in this geographic region has an estimated recurrence
interval of approximately one year. Runoff volume in excess of
the first one-half inch will bypass the soakaway basin and flow
directly to the lake. For the particular project site the design
storm generates a runoff volume of approximately 0.1 acre-feet,
thus the storage volume in the soakaway basin will be a minimum
of 0.1 acre-feet.
....
"'"
....,
-
...
-;
....
Storm runoff from the watershed area is collected in a stormdrain
system which passes through a modified cleanout before ultimately
discharging into the lake (see Conceptual Grading Plan - Map
Pocket and Cross-Section details - Figures 2-3). The modified
cleanout forces low flows to be diverted through a lateral pipe
to the soakaway basin until it is filled to its design capacity
of 0.1 acre-feet. Once storage of that volume is achieved, the
high water level in the basin and the momentum of the flow in the
stormdrain pipe force stormwater to flow through the cleanout to
the outfall portion of the stormdrain to the lake.
...
....
...
-
Once water starts to flow to the lake, some water will still flow
to the soakaway basin as long as the hydraulic grade 1 ine
elevation in the modified cleanout is higher than the water level
in the basin. Freeboard around the basin must allow for ponding
at least as high as the hydraulic grade line elevation in the
cleanout during the design storm or else water may spill from the
pond and flow overland into the lake.
...
...
...
...
....
4
j1,1~ 37/
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
t
I
I
I
In order to prevent water .from the soakaway basin from flowing
back through the cleanout and potentially into the lake. once
storm runoff has subsided, a flap valve will be installed at the
basin end of the lateral pipe (see Figure 4). The flap valve
requires a differential head of approximately two inches in order
to open and allow the urban runoff into the infiltration basin.
The invert of the modified cleanout outflow pipe to the lake must
be above the hydraulic grade line elevation required to provide
this differential.
In order to promote primary settling of the larger sediment
particles and thereby extend the service life of the filtration
part of the basin, the lateral pipe will discharge into a forebay
of the infiltration basin. This configuration will concentrate
the majority of the sediment in one area and will also help to
quickly reduce the incoming velocity. The water can thus
distribute more evenly across the surface of the basin and soak
with a minimum of sediment, thus reducing surface po~e clogging.
Species of vegetation will be selected for drought tolerance as
recommended by a qualified landscape architect.
To achieve a desirabie infiltration rate of approximately one
inch per hour and a retention time of 36 hours, a sandy loam soil
will be placed to a depth of about three feet in the main section
of the basin. A perforated underdrain pipe wrapped in filter
fabric will be installed near the bottom of the sandy loam to
drain the filtered water to the lake in case the permeablility of
the underlying soil is insufficient to drain the basin in a
reasonable amount of time. A cleanout will be installed on the
perforated pipe to permit maintenance.
5
) tj/J / J7;J-
...
-
MAINTENANCE
""'I
Routine maintenance is an integral part of preserving the
efficiency of the infiltration basin. Graded slopes around the
bottom of the infiltration basin should be limited to 4: 1,
wherever possible, to allow easy access for maintenance and
mowing with standard equipment.
....
...
-
The removal of litter from the basin should take place on a
bimonthly schedule, or as necessary. The basin should be
inspected for standing water approximately 72 hours after every
storm. When inspection indicates a loss in the soil's ability to
allow percolation of the water into the lower layers of the
fil ter soil, the upper two inches of accumulated sediment and
sand should be removed, transported to an appropriate landfill
and replaced with suitable new soil to the original elevation.
..,
""'I
...
The performance of the perforated underdrain should be monitored.
If water does not flow from the outlet of the pipe when it would
normally be expected, or if excessively long ponding times occur,
the pipe should be rodded or snaked to discover and/or remove
roots or other debris. If this is insufficient, the line may
have to be inspected with a video camera of the type used for
sewer inspection. Failure of the underdrain may be due clogging
of the filter fabric around the pipe. In this case the line will
need to be dug up and reinstalled with a new filter and possibly
with a gravel or crushed rock zone around the pipe.
""'I
"'"
...
i
....
...
To maintain the mechanical function of the flap valve, it should
be inspected periodically for debris and foreign objects and its
hinges lubricated annually.
...
",
-.
...
....)
6
...
)il/!- 37;
.... ...~ :.'. "'~'-:-~" =<t
I
:<t ~
zj
OU>
.. I- 0
.... C,) Z
... .-;. I.LJ
C/)
)~
I ~~
\ ~~
\ ~h
~~h
~~~
"
\.iU)!l:
~~~
I
I
I
I
I
,
I
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
<:i
"i
. .
~~
~~
~()
"iii
c:)~
~Q
~lli
~~
~q:
(/)
~~ <(
'Il: 11I11I
~ ~ "?f~
~\!j ~ .
~!!l ~1lI~
'" (IV)
l\:~ ~
llj~ t~~
h ~p,
~ ~ . ~~~
'ill ~
~~~ t;S~
'" il!i;J v.~:(
"<. '<" 'l.tliif
\ \
!'l,~.'''.' , .... -.," .... ....
... ,~ l.. -.. ., '. " . -..
..
..j.....
....
;
,./
..
......
.,'f'"
~:.;;.' ~.",,-.., "..:,.:......,
sO
~\!!~
,,'tv) -J~
~~. -..Ill)
1l..~\Il N
~~~~ Q<:)
~,,;:: ~ .
~I.ll(j"t ~*
~~~~ ltlc:)
~::.~" I~Ul
~It.~~~ 1Il1\:
IP~~ !!j
=?l\j~~ Il:
Q~~1l::
~~~~
\
I
\
\
....'"
~IQ
~~
~U)
<::l
~~
"'~
~~
I
\
C\J
W
0:
::>
(!)
-
u..
jy.4 <:> 7i
...
(I')
w ...
c:
::>
~ ...
-
u.
.....
~
~ "
I:S ~ .Ulvi
~Q) ~~ ...
'l: ~~
~~ ~ui~
~. ~~I\: ~~
~Cl ~~~ -.
"Ill j ~Q;
Cl~ ~1I)tl:: ~~
~Cl %\lJ~ 1 ~ ~~
~Ili Q; ~~ \.::ill -
~I\: .1( 1 Ii <.i~
~~ \l~~ ::.~
~ \IC) 1 n:cs
~ / ...
I
..
U
I
..; UW ..
-1
f z;3
oU?
o' -0 ...
t-z
, . U
. " . w
...... -
:;;,;>.. -' . ,,:,''';'~ (/)
""
1 ~
1 Ii ....
1 I
f I -
I
.,
'"
...
-
JY/;- 37;5
...
I
I
I
I
I
i
1
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
-e:
I
D
v
t-.
::l
~
U
Cl
'l!
~
~
t
o
\(
II
\ij.;
~~
(~
-..It.,; ~~
'oJ" i\j ~
hill...
ClQ 1I5~'
~Illlll~
oJ 'l::ll:;:;1!I
;:\ . c:l:oo,c:j
.. ~Vl ~ll!
~ h~G1
~'~
III
(
'!:
Il~~
't\!)~
~:!:~
ll..,,<I)
~~IJ!
...Ilil:j
~ I
~
~
.Cl..
~
~
~
"t
IJIt
-Ill
h.
~~~~
~~U
~~..~
,,-1"''-1
q:\:~\J
9~~1...
:!!"~~
~9!!l:';
~~~'"
~~~'~
~~~~
l!i
nlli
~~~
~~~
Iu~!
~~11:
~Ill!\:
;I:\l)~
\i~.
:'lll>~
Ill"fl
~ if ;I. ... if 4. ...
oo:t
W
0:
::>
~
-
ll.
~e~;~~~
..
.
~
u '" .. .. .. .. .. ...
g
..
Oz #'4.~;f.#
en Q C\j ~ ~ .. I/) liD
Z
w
:I
~ u~~~;t~:f
o
w
...
.. .
~m.~::~~~
I
i~ tU12~
z
-
Cf):
<tal
all
al
z: ~
Qz;=3
tiOcn
c:::t;~
~w
u::Cf)
z
) Lj/J '57?
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
i
I
APPENDIX H
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES DATA
Jt(/J' :]7')
I
I
I
i
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
ATTACHMENT A
SENSITIVE PLANT SPECIES
KNOWN FROM PROJECT VICINITY
AND
SENSITIVE ANIMAL SPECIES
KNOWN FROM PROJECT VICINITY
j'l/l-J7~
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Attachment A
SENSITIVE PLANT SPECIES
KNOWN FROM PROJECT VICINITY
Species
Statusl
I. Acanthommlha ilicifolia
San Diego Thornmint
USFWS: Candidate (C2)
CDFG: Endangered
CNPS: List IB, 2-3-2
2. Ferocac/US viridescens
San Diego Barrel Cactus
USFWS: Candidate (C2)
CNPS: List 2, 1-3-1
3. HemiwlUa conjugens
Otay Tarplant
USFWS: Candidate (C2)
CDFG: Endangered
CNPS: List IB, 3-3-2
CNPS: List 4, 1-2-1
4. Se/agineUa cinerascens
Mesa Clubmoss
CNPS: List 2, 3-1-1
5. Stipa diegoensis
San Diego County Needle Grass
6. Viguiera laciniata
San Diego Sunflower
CNPS: List 2, 1-2-1
Likelihood of Occurrence
in Project Sites
High: appropriate habitat occurs
onsite and known populations nearby.
Detected at North Point site.
High: soils onsite appropriate.
Known populations occur nearby.
Detected.
Detected at North Point site.
Detected within project vicinity but
not impact area.
lSWJa
USFWS =
CDFG
CNPS
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (1987)
= California Department of Fish and Game (l988a)
= California Native Plant Society (Smith and Berg 1988)
Federal C.andidate Snecies Des; mations
C I = USFWS has sufficient biological information to support a proposal to list as threatened or endangered
C2 = Taxa for which existing information may warrant listing, hot for which substantial biological data to
support a proposed rule are lacking
C3a = Extinct
C3b = Taxonomically invalid
C3c = Too widespread and/or not threatened
CNPS Lists (Smith and Ber. 1988)
List 1: Plants of highest priority
IA: Plants presumed extinct in California
1B: Plants rare or endangered in California and elsewhere
List 2: Plants rare or endangered in California. hot more cornmon elsewhere
List 3: Plants about which we need more information
List 4: Plants of limited distrihotion (a watch list)
I
I
A-I
pl/?~) 7;
-
Attachment A (Continued)
SENSITIVE PLANT SPECIES
KNOWN FROM PROJECT VICINITY
...
....
..,
CNPS R-E-D Code
R !Raritv)
I = Rare, but found in sufficient numbers and distributed widely enough that the potential for extinction or
extirpation is low at this time.
2 = Occurrence confmed to several populations or to one extended population.
3 = Occurrence limited to one or a rew highly restricted populations, or present in such numbers that it is
seldom reported.
...
-
E ffindamzennent)
I = Not endangered.
2 = Endangered in a portion of its range.
3 = Endangered throughout its range.
-
D (Distribution)
I = More or less widespread outside California.
2 = Rare outside California.
3 = Endemic to California.
...
...
-
"'"
...
-
....
...
,
,-
...
-
A-2
;11}/ J?p ...
I
I Attachment A (Continued)
I SENSITIVE ANIMAL SPECIES
KNOWN FROM PROJECT VICINITY
I Status!
Likelihood of Occurring
Species Federa1 State Other in Project sites
I Reptiles and Amphihians
Clemmys marmorala pallida C2 SC SDHS Low: Appropriate habitat lacking.
I Southwestern Pond Turtle
Phrynosoma coronatum blainvillei C2 SC SDHS High: Appropriate habitat exists in
I San Diego Coast Horned Lizard project vicinity.
Cnemidaphorus /ryperythrus beldingi C2 SC SDHS Moderate: Appropriate habitat
Orange-throated Whiptail exists in project vicinity.
I Thamnophis couchi hommondi SDHS High: Appropriate habitat exists in
Two-striped Garter Snake project vicinity.
I UCMnlVa trivirgata CFP High: Appropriate habitat exists in
Coastal Rosy Boa project vicinity.
Birds
I Ardea herodias EVE Detected.
Great Blue Heron
BUIorides striatus EVE Detected.
I Green Heron
AQuila chrysaetos CFP High: Observed flying over sites.
Golden Eagle
I PelectJIWS occidentalis E E BL 1 individual detected.
Brown Pelican
I Awne cunicu/aria SC Moderate: Potential burrow
Burrowing Owl deIected.
Circus cyanelLl SC BL Detected.
I Northern Harrier
Cathartes lIU1'a EVE High: Appropriate foraging habitat
I Turkey Vulture exists in project vicinity.
Campylor/rynchw bTUlllleicapillus EVE Low: Appropriate breeding habitat
Cactus Wren does not exist in project vicinity.
I Polioptila caiifornica PE SC Detected.
California Gnatcatcher
I Ammodramw savannarum perpallidus EVE High: Appropriate habitat occurs
Grasshopper Sparrow onsite.
I A.3
I It//) , J 8"/
...
Attachment A (Continued)
SENSITIVE ANIMAL SPECIES
KNOWN FROM PROJECT VICINITY
..
,
.,
Status!
Likelihood of Occurring
Species Federal State Other in Project sites
Age/aius tricolor C2 High: Appropriate breeding habitat
Tricolored Blackbird occurs in project vicinity.
Mammals
T axideJJ taxis SC High: Appropriate habitat occurs in
American Badger project vicinity.
Plecotus townsendi pallescens SC Moderate: Appropriate roosting
Pale Big-eared Bat habitat occurs in project vicinity.
Macrotus californicus SC Moderate: Appropriate roosting
California Leaf-Nosed Bat habitat occurs in project vicinity.
Eumops perotis californicus C2 SC Moderate: Appropriate roosting
California Mastiff Bat habitat occurs in project vicinity.
...
...
-
-
...
...
! E, endangered; T, threatened; PE, proposed endangered; SC, species of special concern (Remsen 1978 or
Williams 1986); CFP, California Fully Protected (CDFG 1982); CI, category I candidate (U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service has sufficient information to support listing as endangered or threatened); C2, category 2
candidate (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service believes listing may be warranted but lacks sufficient information to
support a formal declaration); BL, Audubon Society Blue List (Tate 1986); SDHS, considered threatened by San
Diego Herpetological Society 1980; Eve, Everett (1979).
...
'"
...
-
-
..
~
..
~
A-4
) Y4-:3f5.2
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Attachment B
CALIFORNIA GNATCATCHER TERRITORY
DISTRmUTION IN THE PROJECT VICINITY
INTRODUCTION
California gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica) breeding territories in the vicinity of the
proposed Olympic Training Center boathouse facility (Figure 1) were mapped in order to
obtain a more accurate assessment of the potential impacts associated with the development
of this project.
METHODS
Surveys for the California gnatcatcher were performed on June 12, 13, 19,20, and 24 of
1991 by Ogden biologist John Konecny and on July 2, 1991 by Ogden biologist Pat Mock.
Five California gnatcatcher territories were mapped in the area surrounding Site 1
(Figure 2). The unbanded gnatcatcher pairs were followed on two to three different days
with binoculars for a total of eight to ten hours each, and the outer boundaries of their use
area were marked on an aerial photo. Areas not used within the outer boundaries were
excluded from calculations of territory acreage.
RESULTS
The breeding territories defined in the field surveys had an average size of approximately
7.6 acres (Table 1). All of the territories were located in good quality coastal sage scrub.
Breeding adult California gnatcatchers were found in Territories 1-4, and one immature
California gnatcatcher was found in Territory 5. California gnatcatchers in Territories 2
and 3 nested in coastal sagebrush (Artemisia californica) and cholla (Opuntia sp.),
respectively. The four pairs of California gnatcatchers had either nestlings or fledglings
during the survey. Pairs in Territories 1-3 each had three offspring, while the pair in
Territory 4 had two offspring.
DISCUSSION
California gnatcatchers did not use the disturbed area proposed for the OTC boathouse
during the breeding season. However, during the non-breeding season California
B-1
)i-J 11 .--- J 8'3
...
-
gnatcatchers typically increase their territory size and often include less productive habitat in
their territories. Therefore, the California gnatcatcher pairs surrounding the preferred site
may expand their non-breeding territories to use the disturbed coastal sage scrub. Further
surveys would be required to determine the extent of territory expansion for this area
during the non-breeding season.
...
-
The proximity of the reservoir to the California gnatcatcher territories may make the area
more productive for this species. The availability of water is likely to enhance insect
populations, the primary food source of California gnatcatchers. Increased productivity of
the habitat may explain why the California gnatcatchers in this area have a smaller average
territory size than California gnatcatchers in other inland area of San Diego County (Ogden
unpublished data).
-
-
-
Other California gnatcatcher subpopulations occur in the area surrounding Otay Reservoir
(Figure 3). The Salt Creek drainage as well as the coastal sage scrub along the margins of
the lake are the major corridors for gnatcatcher movements from Otay Valley to areas
around Proctor Valley and the Upper Otay Reservoir. Therefore, the coastal sage scrub
habitat along the reservoir is an important resource for the connecting the subpopulations of
California gnatcatchers in the region. The GTC boathouse is not considered to significantly
diminish the corridor capacity of this area.
...
...
...
-
Table 1
CALIFORNIA GNATCATCHER SURVEY DATES, TIMES, AND
RESULTS AT THE PREFERRED OTC BOATHOUSE SITE
...
Territory Size Number of
Territory # Dates 6191 Hours (acres) Offspring
I 12,13,24 10 8.3 3
2 12,13 8 5.1 3
3 19,24,(712) 10 6.8 3
4 19,24 9 7.9 2
5 20,24 10 10.1
Average 7.6 2.7
-
-
...
-
...
-
B-2
J'/ 11- jtftj
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
- ERe
I _ ~ Environmental
and Energy
Services Co.
I
o
,
2ZlO
,
FEET
Study Area for the ClIIIfomIa G1.atca1d111'
FIGURE
~
) (19 -3~5
J
g
: I
11
I
:i
II
IU
()
II:
IU
'1rl
Ii: '"
III Cl:
~ ;:l ~
~ Iii c
T C W
... -
-
...
0
I
I
I
~;;,,--. .
--":"~
...~.'--~
- - '- -
. ~/.
"
I
,
.
- -..~-
~-
.-), -
. "--.,
--;1:--
I
I
I
I
"
- i
- -' ~ '{/.
'.:~''''
. "
-. -;;1
-,....-..'
",t;;l
".I.." . ~ :,
. "~'~ 1 , .~\'
- ?" .. ....., ,a...~~;>.
k~~;~~;~;;,~-,~~E~~- / 're'
:\.Ir. ';'~-'I J!..-- ',.;/i _ -", '\,:~':---\ .f'"
, 1~' 1/ ",' i/ /'- . '-- ;::~~ .-~, ; ~ "
j; 1 .,-'_'-~~//" ~ ~'~~ ~~_ :;;~~_\,_,,~..,)~... .~:
. ~_:.-=. . ~ . ~v.~, \,' ol.:'
i _,~ _ _/_ -t-.- / ;:~, -~-t3;~ ' -~-~C~--
/' '0
"/
A~~-~---'"_':' mun_____."
~-~ -
,
.'
...._..~-
. <
',-.~'''; '-
,
':;. ~!-
I
~~~~~=-~, -~. -~.
~><,r~ ,;~,_..._~ ~'i
~j!t:~~~:r~:_-~(
.- -\
.Lr;~
ft--; .
..~ '. -,-
I
I
- ,.- ~ - ..:"'.,
-.'
,
-::j...'.';
/'
," .~_. .
",'" ~'
'J~ 1'-'
"
I
n-;_~::_~\;:I-\.\
\, \
r-e"--
-"'--"7;' ",",,,
.,r.
i.
.
I
I,
~1. .>..-
_;"~~~l
- ...-;::---.....'- ,-
'"
"
"
~
,\,,~
I
;:/".,
- -',-~ ...-. -~'.~~.. ~~.,
-
...
"....i
r-C
:-'If:
I
I
I
I
)'-//J .. J 'iJ7
I
"
I
Cl.
!
-
go
E
~
OJ
J
!
-
.5
..
...
c
E
SiP
Ul
..
!
I
o
I
B
I
~
III
U
~
III
,1r,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Attachment C
POTENTIAL IMPACTS TO WATERFOWL
AT LOWER OTAY RESERVOIR
There is very little information on the bird use and status of nesting birds at lower Otay
reservoir. No Audubon Christmas bird counts are done at the reservoir and the only data
available are individual sighting repons (P. Unitt, pers. comm.) and hunting takes (City of
San Diego Water Utilities Department). Larry Bottroff from the City of San Diego and
formerly the California Department of Fish and Game, reponed that the lake was mainly
used for resting and foraging, and that little nesting occurred onsite. A list of common
species that use the lake was provided by Larry Bottroff (Table 1). Table 2 shows the total
number of waterfowl taken by hunters at lower Otay reservoir during the 1990 season.
Several agencies were contacted to obtain information on the potential impact of rowers and
kayakers to waterfowl. All agencies contacted agreed that some level of disturbance to
foraging and open water roosting would occur from continuous use of the open water
areas. Agency staff also agreed that emergent vegetation was an imponant refuge and
nesting area and that boaters should be kept out of this habitat.
Table 3 shows the average number of boats (private and rental) on the reservoir on open
days by month. The majority of these boats are motorized. There will be a maximum of
30 boats associated with Olympic training activities on the lake at anyone time. However,
no athletes would be allowed to use the Harvey Arm of the reservoir from mid-October to
mid-January and athletes would have to remain 150 feet from shore on Wednesdays,
Saturdays, and Sundays from mid-January to mid-October.
Due to the relatively low numbers of boats from the Olympic Training Facility on the lake at
anyone time, the restrictions on athletes specified in the project description, and the nature
of the potential impacts (i.e., less than approximately 30 non-motorized boats on the lake at
anyone time), the impacts to waterfowl are not considered significant. Ogden recommends
that the boats be kept a minimum of 20 feet away from the emergent vegetation, and that
surveys of waterfowl use of the lake be conducted before and after project implementation,
and any observed responses to the boating be noted.
C-l
FIIl- '3 <{;/
...
...
Table 1
COMMONLY NOTED BIRDS FROM OT A Y LAKES
(BOTTROFF, PERS. COMM.)
"'I
Scientific Name
Common Name
...
Podilymbus podiceps
P odiceps nigricollis
Aechmophorus occidentalis
Ardea herodias
Butorides striatus
Nycticorax nycticorax
Anas platyrhynchos
Haliaeetus leucocephalus
Circus cyaneus
Accipiter striatus
Buteo lineatus
Buteo jamaicensis
Aquila chrysaetos
Falco sparverius
Gallinula chloropus
Fulica americana
Sterna maxima
Sterna torsteri
pied-billed grebe
eared grebe
western grebe
great blue heron
green-backed heron
black-crowned night-heron
mallard
bald eagle
northern harrier
sharp-shinned hawk
red-shouldered hawk
red-tailed hawk
golden eagle
American kestrel
common moorhen
American coot
royal tern
Forster's tern
..
...
...
...
...
...
ADDITIONAL BIRD SPECIES ASSOCIATED WITH WATER,
FROM OGDEN SURVEYS: 9/18/90
...
...
Scientific Name
Common Name
P elecanus occidentalis
Phalacrocorax auritus
Ixobrychus exilis
Egretta thula
Porzana carolina
Charadrius vociferus
Tringa melanoleuca
Actitis macularia
Gallinago gallinago
lArus californicus
Sterna caspia
Ceryle alcyon
Cistothorus palustris
brown pelican
double-crested connorant
least bittern
snowy egret
sora
killdeer
greater yellowlegs
spotted sandpiper
common snipe
California gull
Caspian tern
belted kingfisher
marsh wren
"'I,
...
...
..
....
-
C-2
114 ~38'~
....
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Table 2
DUCK HUNT TOTALS FOR THE
1990 SEASON AT LOWER OTAY RESERVOIR
Number of Hunters:
Days of Operation:
843
18
Species
Number Taken
lesser scaup (A ythya affinis)
bufflehead (Bucephala albeo/a)
canvasback (Aythya valisineria)
gadwall (Anas srrepera)
goldeneye (Bucephala clangula)
mallard (Anas p/aryrhynchos)
redhead (Aythya americana)
ruddy duck (Oxyurajamaicensis)
northern shoveler (Anas clypeata)
northern pintail (Anas acura)
American widgeon (Anas americana)
green-winged teal (Anas crecca)
blue-winged teal (Anas discors)
cinnamon teal (Anas cyanoptera)
ring-necked duck (Aytha collaris)
common merganser (Mergus merganser)
American coot (Fulica americana)
common snipe (Gallinaga gallinago)
Canada goose (Branta canadensis)
211
86
126
301
3
102
12
199
198
99
194
153
6
202
87
2
123
1
1
Total Waterfowl taken
Average Waterfowl/Hunter
2106
2.50
C-3
Ji!/J-39o
...
...
Table 3
AVERAGE NUMBER (1987-1991) OF
PRIVATE AND RENTAL BOATS
ON LOWER OTAY RESERVOIR ON OPEN DAYS
""\
...
Average Open Days/Month Average ...
Month Boats/Month in 1992 Boats/Day
...
January 604 13 46
February 1865 13 143
March 1612 13 124 -.
April 1279 13 98
May 993 14 71 ....
June 839 12 70
July 1011 13 78 ..
August 919 14 66
September 852 13 66
...
October 91 11 8
November 0 8 0
December 0 9 0 ..
-
...
...
...
...
...
...
C-4
JY(1- 37/ ...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
AGENCIES/PERSONS CONTACTED
Phil Unitt
Mike Wolden
John Massie
Dennis Bostad
Larry Bottroff
George Hanson -
San Diego Natural History Museum
Sacramento National Wildlife Refuge. USFWS
California Department of Fish and Game
Sweetwater Authority
City of San Diego
Amateur Birdwatcher
C-s
;L(A r 3'7.J-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX I
REVEGET A TION/MITIGA TION PLAN FOR
OLYMPIC TRAINING CENTER BOATHOUSE,
LOWER OTA Y LAKE
Jllj} ~ J9J
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Revegetation/Mitigation Plan for
the Olympic Training Center Boathouse,
Lower Otay Lake
Chula Vista, California
Prepared for:
The City of chula Vista
276 4th Avenue
Chula Vista, California
and
McKinley /Sopac
Prepared by:
Ogden Environmental and Energy Services Co.
5510 Morehouse Drive
San Diego, California 92121
Brad Burkhart
Revegetation Designer
John L. Minchin
Landscape Architect/Revegetation Designer
January 1992
)'1/; - 3/Jt!
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Revegetation/Mitigation Plan for
the Olympic Training Center Boathouse,
Lower Otay Lake
Chula Vista, California
Prepared for:
The City of Chula Vista
and
McKinley /Sopac
January 1992
) ill - 3 'l f
I
I
I SECTION
1.0
I 1.1
1.2
I 1.3
1.4
I 1.5
2.0
I 2.1
2.1.1
I 2.1.2
2.2
I 2.3
I 3.0
3.1
3.2
I 3.3
3.4
I 3.5
3.6
I 3.7
4.0
I 4.1
4.2
I 4.3
4.4
I 4.4.1
4.4.2
I 4.4.3
4.4.4
I
I
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TITI.E
INTRODUCTION AND PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS
Coastal Sage Scrub Impacts
Wetland Impacts
Project Description
Existing Vegetation
Wildlife
BIOLOGICAL IMPACTS
Direct Impacts
Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub
Wetland FringelFreshwater Marsh
Indirect Impacts
Cumulative Impacts
MfTIGA TION REQUIREMENTS
Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub
Wetland MarshIFreshwater Fringe
Feasibility of the Proposed Mitigation Sites
Open Space Dedication
Performance Bonds, Assurities, and Penalties
Implementation of Mitigation Plan
Fire Management Concerns
MfTIGATIONIREVEGETATION PROGRAM
Installation Schedule
Qualifications of the Revegetation Designer and
Final Plan Preparation
Contractor Education
Protection During Construction
Coastal Sage Scrub Mitigation Protection
Wetland Mitigation Protection
Facility Construction Protection
Post -Construction Protection
U!m
I
I
1
I
5
7
9
9
9
10
10
10
11
11
11
14
15
15
16
16
16
17
17
18
18
18
19
19
20
/'1~ ~ 39~:J[b
...
...
T ABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
...
SECTION TITLE PAGE
4.5 Site Soil Conditions 20
...
4.5.1 Coastal Sage Scrub Mitigation Areas 20
4.5.2 Wetland Mitigation Areas 20
4.6 Plant Palette Design 21 ...
4.6.1 Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub Mitigation 21
4.6.2 Wetland Mitigation 23 ...
4.7 Planting Specifications and Plant Material Sources 23
4.8 Irrigation 27
...
4.8.1 Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub Mitigation 27
4.8.2 Wetland Mitigation Irrigation 27
4.9 Replacement of Dead or Diseased Plant Materials 28 ...
4.10 Weed Control 28
4.11 Pest Control 28 ...
4.12 Pruning/Staking 28
4.13 Fertilization and Planting BackfIll 29
...
5.0 MAINTENANCE PROORAM 29
5.1 Purpose 29 ...
5.2 Maintenance/Monitoring Period 29
5.3 Maintenance Requirements 30 ...
5.3.1 Contractor Education 30
5.3.2 Dead Plant Replacement 30
...
5.3.3 Irrigation Maintenance and Withdrawal 30
5.3.4 Pest Control 31
5.3.5 Weed Control 31 ...
5.3.6 Herbicides 31
5.3.7 FertiIization 32 ...
5.3.8 Staking and Caging 32
5.3.9 Trash and Debris Removal 32
...
5.3.10 Habitat Access Control 32
5.3.11 Future Maintenance/Management Objectives 33
...
...
ji
) t/ A -3 '7 7
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
SECTION
6.0
6.1
6.2
6.3
6.4
6.4.1
6.4.2
6.4.3
6.4.4
6.5
6.6
6.6.1
6.6.2
7.0
NIJMRRR
1
2
3
4
5
6a
6b
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
TITLE
MONITORING PROGRAM
Purpose
Horticultural Monitoring
Botanical Monitoring
Success Criteria
Cover Standards: Coastal Sage Scrub Mitigation
Hydroseeding Success: Coastal Sage Scrub Mitigation
Container Plantings Success: Coastal Sage Scrub
Wetland Mitigation
Exotic Weed Species Removal
Remedial Measures
Pinal Project Resolution
Coastal Sage Scrub Mitigation Areas
Wetland Mitigation Areas
REFERENCES
LIST OF FIGURES
TITI.E
Regional Vicinity Map
Location of Project Site
Mitigation Area Site Map
Existing Vegetation Maps (Boathouse Site)
California Gnatcatcher Territories at Lower Otay Reservoir
Proposed Revegetation Plans (Boathouse Site)
Proposed Revegetation Plans (OTC, SW Boundary Sites)
iii
PAGE
33
33
34
34
35
35
36
36
37
37
38
38
38
38
PAGE
2
3
4
6
8
12
13
;tfA ~ J 9 'if'
...
...
T ABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
-
LIST OF TABLES
N1JMBER TITI.E PAGE ...
1 Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub Container List 22
2 Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub Hydroseed Mix 24 ...
3 Wetland Mitigation Container List 25
...
APPENDIX
-
LETTER TITLE PAGE
A Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE) Letter Regarding ...
404 Permit Authorization, Dated November 27,1991 A-I
~
...
..
""I
-
""I
...
...
...
..
iv
Fill / 399
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1.0 INTRODUCTION AND PERMITTING REQUIREMENTS
The following report describes the proposed mitigation plan for impacts to coastal sage
scrub and wetland habitats resulting from the construction of the Olympic Training Center
(OTC) Boathouse on the edge of Lower Otay Lake, Chula Vista, California (Figures I,
2, 3). Formal landscape and irrigation plans shall be developed to implement the goals of
this mitigation plan. These final construction documents and specifications must be
approved by the City of Chula Vista prior to initiation of construction.
1.1 COASTAL SAGE SCRUB IMPACTS
This plan is intended to satisfy the City of San Diego's Resource Protection Ordinance
(RPO) guidelines for mitigation ratios for coastal sage scrub impacts; however, a RPO
permit will not be required for this project. This mitigation plan must be approved by the
CDFG, City of Chula Vista, and the City of San Diego Environmental Analysis Section
prior to implementation.
1.2 WETLAND IMPACTS
This plan is also intended to provide sufficient information for the issuance of a Streambed
Alteration Agreement under State Code 1601 from the California Department of Fish and
Game (CDFG) for the impacts to wetland habitats as well as RPO wetland mitigation
requirements. A Nationwide 404 permit for the project has already been issued by the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE), (see Appendix A).
1.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed OTC boathouse involves the construction of a single story building along the
edge of Lower Otay Lake. The boathouse will provide the storage, launching, and support
facility for canoeing, kayaking, and rowing sports associated with the OTC training
objectives.
The proposed boathouse site is located east of Wueste Road on the edge of Lower Otay
Lake, and across the road from the main complex of the Olympic Training Center. The site
1
) i'A - LjPO
-
-
."-.---.-----.,
i .....
. ..........
"",-"" ...............
~._. ~
! ~._._._.-
!
-
-.-.-.-.---.-.-.-.-----..
-
FALLBROOK
-
-
.<>
."
C>
-
...
.."
...
-
C>
LEUCADI~
o
-
C>
""
z
Elc."".1
f
-
,..
-
ALPINE
-
~QCIGlld
R~If'uoir
-
1/'::;'"
~'
-
Q
.
.
-
MILE.
---
~R.ER~_---
___-- XlCO
I PROJECT SITE ~
-
~
"'!
2
FIGURE
[!]
II( If -I/o /
-
OGDEN
.....
Regional Vicinity Map
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
,
o
,
2200
,
FEEl'
OGDEN
.....
I" G ~ R "I
JlI/J -,-/0.2.
location of Project Site
3
...
...
~"flll
Bill!
-~
~IJ'<:.
~
..
...
LOWER
OTAY
LAKE
..
Illi
...
...
...
...
..
...
I SHORE I
liNE
...
~
...
..
EXISTING
D1EGAN COASTAL
SAGE SCRUB
VEGETATION
I BOUNDARY I
OTHERO.T.C.
LANDSCAPED
AREAS
(NOT A PART)
..
Q
..
OGDEN
.....
MItIgation Area Site Map
1L/1~ YO]
NOT TO SCAlE
i' ' "s" "I
...
4
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
encompasses approximately 3.1 acres and is on City of San Diego land which will be
leased. The project's vehicular access would be provided by a new boathouse access road
from the existing Wueste Road. Pedestrian access to the site would be facilitated by a
pathway from the eastern edge of the OTC facility, to the south side of the boathouse.
The project proposes a total grading area of approximately 3.0 acres, including 2.4 acres of
previously disturbed Diegan coastal sage scrub and 0.6 of an acre of undisturbed Diegan
coastal sage scrub. An additional 0.1 acre of wetland fringe area (Le., freshwater marsh
and riparian scrub vegetation) will be disturbed to create a sand pathway for lake shore
boating access.
1.4 EXISTING VEGETATION
The vegetation communities on the boathouse site include Diegan coastal sage scrub, and
wetland fringe (Le., riparian scrub, and freshwater marsh). The central portion of the site
is characterized by coastal sage scrub that has been disturbed by previous grading activities.
The dominant species in the disturbed coastal sage scrub area include California buckwheat
(Eriogonum fasciculatum) and broom baccharis (Baccharis sarothroides), which are
sparsely distributed throughout the disturbed area. Undisturbed coastal sage scrub habitat
surrounding the disturbed area of the site is dominated by California buckwheat and
California sagebrush (Anemisia californica) with broom baccharis found in swales at the
north and south ends of the site (Figure 4). Small patches of coastal prickly pear (Opuntia
littoralis) and coast cholla (Opuntia prolifera) are also interspersed throughout this habitat.
Bordering the shore of lower Otay reservoir is an approximately SO-foot wide band of
freshwater marsh dominated by bulrush (Scirpus californicus). Associated with this marsh
is a thin wetland fringe of riparian scrub dominated by black willow (Salix gooddingii var.
variabilis) located immediately upland of the bulrushes.
Two sensitive plant species were detected in proximity to the boathouse: mesa clubmoss
(Selaginella cinerascens) and San Diego sunflower (Viguiera laciniata). Mesa clubmoss is
dispersed throughout openings in the undisturbed coastal sage scrub habitat onsite, and
approximately 45 San Diego sunflower individuals were observed at the southeastern
portion of the site area. (See Figure 4 for the existing vegetation communities.)
5
JL/A -ij!Jt{
-
I ...
LOWER
.. ~I ...
OTAY
LAKE
I ~! ...
/ ~
Z ...
01
~
' . '--._._-=~- RIPARIANI
WILLOW
( SCRUB -
/ XS58 ii )(5610 BOATHOUSE
0 ACCESS
!;? ROAD
~ ...
Selaginella ---~_.
(SCATTERED
THROUGHOUT) ...
/
...
)(548.0
SAND PATH ...
...
ill'"
,
-1-
Q 280
0
, ,
FEET
...
...
LEGEND
FRESHWATER MARSHlWETLAND FRINGE
WILLOW SCRUB
DIEGAN COASTAL SAGE SCRUB
DISTURBED COASTAL SAGE SCRUB
EUCALYPTUS
...
...
Baccharis/Nicotiana
Viouiera laciniata (San Diego sunflower)
AREAS OF DISTURBANCE
...
...
OGDEN
.....
F
Vegetation Communities and Sensitive Plant~
Species location at the Boathouse Site
Impacted Areas I L/ 1/- 1-/&
6
I G U
4
R E
I
...
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1.5 WILDLIFE
The quality of the wildlife habitat at this site varies. The disturbed coastal sage scrub in the
central portion of the site appears to have been graded in the past and is considered to be of
low quality due to low structural and species diversity. The coastal sage scrub habitats at
the south, west, and north portions of the site are of higher quality. These sage scrub
habitats support populations of mesa club moss and San Diego sunflower and may support
populations of orange-throated whiptails (Cnemidophorus hyperythrus beldingi) and San
Diego horned lizard (Phrynosoma coronatum blainvillei). (Other detected and potentially
occurring sensitive species were listed in Attachment A in Appendix E of the Biological
Resources Report (Ogden).)
Five breeding territories of California gnatcatchers were mapped in the project vicinity.
The California gnatcatcher is currently under consideration for federal and state endangered
species status. The breeding territories are in the coastal sage scrub adjacent to the
proposed boathouse site (see Figure 5). The disturbed coastal sage scrub on the project
site may be used for foraging in non-breeding season, but the quality of the habitat limits its
usefulness as a breeding habitat. Habitats to the west of this site have been completely
destroyed by agriculture, and habitats to the north of this site have been disturbed by
grading or fire and are unlikely to support breeding California gnatcatchers. Eucalyptus
trees onsite are likely to be used by raptors and other birds as roosts.
The lake itself is also an important resource to wildlife species. There is very little
information on the bird use and status of nesting birds at Lower Otay Lake. No Christmas
bird counts are conducted at the lake, and the only data available are individual sighting
reports (pers. comm. P. Unitt). Larry Bottroff (pers. comm.) from the City of San Diego,
reports that the lake is used mainly for foraging, and that little nesting occurs on site. In
addition, the reservoir is likely to be an important source of water for mammalian species in
open space areas to the north, south, and east of the reservoir.
7
FI/I- I-Jl) b
'"
W
~> fil U"'
~~ ~ ~~~
o,,~~ua::(3 w
%:!:> I,j,.W::> I-
w;;Oil< ili o/iw ~
ffl ~t:: 0 ~!:;((!) x
... ~"'" il- CLO~ If
c: ....ttCll Q..
I!! !i!Zii\ ~
, I<9J ~i $
: &3~ ~
~
~B"
- .::;:>
~ ~-
\
~
"
~
I
!
)
i
!
I
II
(,)
II:
III
,~,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
2.0 BIOLOGICAL IMPACTS
2.1 DIRECT IMPACTS
The proposed OTC boathouse site was chosen due to its proximity to the OTC facility,
accessibility to the lake, as well as the previously disturbed condition of the immediate site
area (i.e., disturbed Diegan coastal sage scrub vegetation). By utilizing the existing
disturbed area, impacts to sensitive species would be minimized as well as the degree of
necessary mitigation would be reduced.
2.1.1 Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub
The construction of the boathouse training facilities at this chosen site will result in impacts
to approximately 3.0 acres of Diegan coastal sage scrub. Approximately 0.6 of an acre of
the Diegan coastal sage scrub impacts occur in high quality, undisturbed Diegan coastal
sage scrub, and the remaining acreage impacts (2.4 acres), due to the siting of the facility,
occur in low quality, previously disturbed Diegan coastal sage scrub.
The impacts to Diegan coastal sage scrub are considered significant because of the regional
sensitivity of this habitat and because it supports sensitive plant and animal species.
It has been determined, however, that the boathouse and the proposed grading and planting
activities will not impact the five existing breeding California gnatcatcher territories
surrounding the lake. Gnatcatchers may use portions of the disturbed coastal sage scrub in
the proposed project area for non-breeding season foraging, however no nesting is likely to
occur due to its disturbed condition. The relative high density of the gnatcatchers in the
adjacent area and the fact that none are currently utilizing this immediate site indicates that
the disturbed sage scrub habitat at the proposed boathouse site is of marginal quality.
Direct impacts to California gnatcatchers are not considered to be significant for this
project. Potential impacts to other sensitive species detected on the site are also not
anticipated to be significant. (See the Biological Resources Report (Ogden) for more
information.)
9
F!A -Lfo~
-
...
2.1.2 Wetland Fringe/Freshwater Marsh
...
Construction of the proposed sand access pathway from the boathouse facility to the lake
will result in impact to 0.1 of an acre of wetland fringe, that is composed of freshwater
marsh and riparian scrub. The impact to this wetland habitat is considered significant
because of its high biological value and protected status at the federal, state, and local
levels. Impacts to this wetland habitat will require a CDFG Streambed Alteration
Agreement. The project has already been issued a Nationwide 404 permit from the ACOE
for wetland impacts (see Appendix A).
...
...
...
2.2 INDIRECT IMPACTS
...
Indirect impacts as a result of the construction of the proposed boathouse facility might
include soil erosion and sedimentation into wetland areas, and indirect human
encroachment on the surrounding gnatcatcher habitat. Any sedimentation which might
occur within the wetlands would be considered a significant adverse impact. Indirect
impacts to California gnatcatchers as a result of the increased encroachment due to human
access and activity at the boathouse site could be considered potentially significant. These
indirect impacts will however be mitigated to below a level of significance by restricting
human access to the coastal sage scrub areas with fences, and signs. In addition, careful
protective measures will be instituted during construction to ensure protection of the
wetlands from erosion and sedimentation.
...
...
...
...
...
2.3 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS
The cumulative impacts associated with the project include the loss of habitat, impacts to
sensitive species populations on a regional basis and increased human activity at the lake.
The cumulative loss of Diegan coastal sage scrub and other potentially occurring sensitive
species, is considered a significant adverse impact and must be mitigated for with
replacement plantings. Potential significant impacts due to increased human activity at the
boathouse site will be mitigated for by implementing remedial measures (e.g., controlling
shoreline access year round to only OTC boating activities) and other protective measures
that will be further discussed in Section 4.4.
...
...,
...
...
...
...
10
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
3.0 MITIGATION REQUIREMENTS
The proposed mitigation areas described below shall be approved by the City of San Diego,
and City of Chula Vista staff, in consultation with the CDFG. Final construction and
monitoring of the mitigaiton areas will be administered by the City of Chula Vista.
3.1 DIEGAN COASTAL SAGE SCRUB
Approximately 0.6 of an acre of high quality Diegan coastal sage scrub will be impacted by
the grading for the boathouse access road and approximately 2.4 acres of disturbed Diegan
coastal sage scrub will be impacted by construction of the actual boathouse facility. A
2: 1 mitigation ratio is proposed for the loss of the high quality Diegan coastal sage scrub
(Le., 1.2 acres) and a 1:1 ratio is proposed forthe disturbed Diegan coastal sage scrub due
to its current low quality (Le., 2.4 acres). Therefore, a total of 3.6 acres of Diegan coastal
sage scrub are proposed to be created as mitigation acreage. Since no appropriate area
exists at the boathouse site to accommodate this acreage, two slope areas at the southwest
boundary of the OTC facility, adjacent to the Salt Creek dedicated open space (see
Figures 2 and 3), have been chosen as the proposed mitigation site. This area was chosen
in order to have the mitigation plantings be contiguous with the adjacent high quality
Diegan sage scrub vegetation currently existing within the open space. It is felt that this
will provide the best opportUnity for facilitating the creation of viable California gnatcatcher
habitat. The proposed Diegan sage scrub mitigation/revegetation areas are shown on
Figure 6b.
3.2 WETLAND MARSH/FRESHWATER FRINGE
It has been determined that there are no areas around the lake margin feasible for freshwater
marsh restoration due to the current shore line vegetation density and water level
constraints. As a result it is proposed that the minor impacts to the freshwater marsh
habitat (0.1 of an acre) shall be mitigated for with out-of-kind plantings of a native riparian
tree species, Le., Fremont cottonwood (Populus fremontii), at a 3: 1 ratio planted along the
edge of the existing riparian scrub/wetland fringe northeast of the boathouse. This
mitigation ratio equates to 20 trees planted at 30' O.C along this area. This location has
been chosen because it will facilitate the long term water requirements for the cottonwoods,
and will be appropriate to the adjacent habitat.
11
/ t/A - L--j oj
...
^ HV'IO~~
..:.... i5t4.2i5
;L' ._~,~~;~
J< ..J
I '
,I :.j .
~ f-~'
" "
, (
If: ...
II' '\\
'! / '
/~ \'\
" . \ \
,/ i \,
1IIIt1f DIIr'" \
,
..
; i
j
t
IOTAVI
LAKE
,
..
/
""
I
/
EXISTING
RIPARIAN
SCRUB
..
LAKE
EDGE!
SHORE
..,
...
..
.;,
0/'
/(j
,.
'''".
"'",
... ,.-/ I
~_/ '
\
.......1
PFIOPOSED . '. "
Populus FremQnt;
(20IiREES@ .'
3D~O.O., '" '
""
""
r-
I
~
""
,- -,
...,
...
-..
~,
,
,
~~\ I
';;;i \ I
, ,\
...
...
...
/ ' ,1// .
'II I
'/11 (
/,.// /
, "
500
,
FEET
...,
~
OGDEN
FIGURE
ProPosed Revegetation Plan (Boathouse Site) ~
(Wetland Mitigation) L( /J a
} 'Ljlf}
12
..
.....
...
~~
~c
~\
~O'
~d
::::::=-:::::::
,",w
wU
llg;~
~ffi<
~~
w
~~~
1n;;5
x,,'"
w,"
C
"
:0
a:
"
'"
w <(
'" w
~, ~g
...Je( Dla
~~ ~.21
~c( c(~
O~ ~~
gi= ~ =
~~ 5~
o~ a: [
a..w ill ctI
~~ <0"
c..c: Oe
I ~I!
Q '~, 1~
.
'--
'::
""
,
~
'sC
""
~
~
F
~
L
u
n
]!
. 2
~~
o.
il
.."
U
00
il'"
d
li
!
UI
()
II:
UI
,~,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Additional mitigation required as a result of unauthorized impacts outside of the proposed
impacted areas, shall be performed by a change order at no cost to the City or client and
deducted from the contractors original contract price.
3.3 FEASIBILITY OF THE PROPOSED MITIGATION SITES
The sites selected for the mitigation/revegetation plantings meet the following site approval
criteria as set forth in the City of San Diego's R.PO guidelines.
I. Habitat creation mav occur in areas not formerly occunied bv the resource (Leu
wetlands. coastal sal!e scrub), but are not of hi~h habitat value in their own
mhl.
Coastal sage scrub mitigation: The sites selected for creation of coastal sage
scrub vegetation along the southwest property line boundary of the OTC facility
are currently manufactured unvegetated fill slopes, that were graded with the
facility construction.
Wetland mitigation: The site for the proposed planting of the cottonwood
vegetation is currently a thin band of riparian scrub which will be enhanced
through this addition.
2. The site shall not nossess any sensitive biolol!ical resources that would be
disturbed bv the proposed creation.
Coastal sage scrub mitigation: The mitigation is proposed on recently graded
slopes of the development.
Wetland mitigation: Mitigation is proposed to take place in openings of the
existing riparian scrub with no disturbance to existing wetland cover.
3. The site shall be canable of sqp'portin~ the habitat heinl! created without anv
permanent irril!ation.
Coastal sage scrub mitigation: The coastal sage scrub site will only require
temporary irrigation for a short 1- to 2- year establishment period.
14
;c?J- if / ;L
I,
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Wetland mitigation: The selected site for planting of the trees is along the lake
and is close enough to the lake water table to not require permanent inigation.
4. Habitat creation shall occur on. or as close to. the proiect site as Dossible.
Coastal sage scrub mitigation: The coastal sage scrub mitigation area is less
than a quarter of a mile from the boathouse site, and is still a part of the overall
OCT Facility, while being immediately adjacent to an existing dedicated open
space with high quality Diegan coastal sage scrub vegetation.
Wetland mitigation: The wetland mitigation area is immediately adjacent to the
boathouse site.
3.4 OPEN SPACE DEDIC A TION
The proposed revegetation areas shown in Figures 6a and 6b must be approved by the City
of San Diego, CDFG and the City of Chula Vista Planning Department. If accepted these
mitigation areas shall be placed in permanent open-space easements, thus preventing any
future development in these areas, unless so approved.
3.5 PERFORMANCE BONDS, ASSURITIES, AND PENAL TIES
A performance bond shall be required and posted as a surety for compliance with the
mitigation, monitoring, and reporting requirements as specified in this repon. This bond
shall cover all mitigation construction implementation installation, monitoring costs and the
associated 5-year monitoring and maintenance costs. Additionally, monetary penalties for
any additional impacts to sensitive biological resources outside of the approved
construction zone or corridor may be assessed as required by the City of Chula Vista, City
of San Diego and CDFG. No part of this bond shall be refunded until both the monitoring
biologist and the City of Chula Vista have approved the mitigations as complete. Each
mitigation type will be bonded and released separately.
15
1'14 -J./I J
...
..
3.6 IMPLEMENTATION OF MITIGATION PLAN
...
Implementation of the mitigation plan is divided into the following three sections including:
Revegetation, Maintenance, and Monitoring Programs. Some tasks within these three
programs may appear to be redundant; however, different contractors may be responsible
for implementing different portions of this mitigation plan, thus it is felt that reiterating the
required responsibilities in each program will reduce potential confusion during actual
implementation. Certain elements of the Revegetation Program will be implemented for
120 days after planting. Other elements of the Maintenance and Monitoring Programs will
be implemented concurrently for 5 years beginning at the end of the 120-day establishment
period, following acceptance of the installation by the revegetation designer.
...
...
...
""I
3.7 FIRE MANAGEMENT CONCERNS
...
All future facilities within the OTC property boundaries, adjacent to the Diegan coastal sage
scrub mitigation areas, must abide by mandated fire management guidelines and shall be
designed with adequate fire buffer setbacks such that no brush clearing for fire management
protection will be necessary within the mitigation areas. It is anticipated that an
approximate loo-foot wide buffer be maintained consistently from the edge of the sage
scrub vegetation to any adjacent facility, this is conceptually shown on Figure 6b.
-
...
...
4.0 MITIGATION/REVEGETATION PROGRAM
...
It is the policy of the USFWS, ACOE, and CDFG to accept no net loss of wetland habitat
in both quantity and quality. This revegetation plan proposes to replace impacted wetland
habitat with a comparable wetland tree species that will improve the habitat quality. In
addition the quantity of Diegan sage scrub habitat in the surrounding area will be increased
to mitigate for the effect of the boathouse construction. Maintenance of the revegetation
areas will prevent the re-establishment of non-native weedy species and will help assure
viable habitat.
-
...
...
In addition to the proposed mitigation areas, other areas adjacent to the boathouse access
road, that will be disturbed by construction, will be revegetated with compatible coastal
sage scrub vegetation; however, these areas will not be a pan of the required mitigation
acreage and will not be monitored. In addition other slope areas outside of the proposed
sage scrub mitigation sites, on the southwest boundary, will also be planted with
....
""I
"'l
16
/ L/IJ -' 2-//'-/
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
compatible sage scrub vegetation, however, they to will not be formally included as
mitigation acreage and will not be formally monitored
The provisions of this and the following sections of this report apply equally to both the
wetland and coastal sage scrub mitigations unless noted otherwise.
4.1 INSTALLATION SCHEDULE
Revegetation and restoration construction activities will be scheduled for during the winter
period. In addition, the recommended time of the year for the best initial root development
for plantings is from November through February, and the recommended time of year for
best hydroseed germination success is between October and December. All seeding
activities will be implemented within this time window although container plantings may be
done throughout the year. It is also permissable for the wetland and coastal sage scrub
mitigations to be started at different dates provided all mitigation work is completed before
the OTC boat facility is completed.
4.2 QUALIFICATIONS OF THE REVEGETATION DESIGNER AND FINAL
PLAN PREPARATION
A qualified revegetation designer, acceptable to the City of Chula Vista, with knowledge of
coastal sage scrub and riparian scrub ecosystems in southern California, will work with a
Landscape Architect registered in the State of California to develop final landscape plans.
The revegetation designer and the Landscape Architect must be approved by the City
Landscape Architect of the City of Chula Vista Planning Department. The revegetation
designer will develop all conceptual planting layouts and consult with the Landscape
Architect in the design of the irrigation layout and final construction specifications. The
Landscape Architect will be responsible for the preparation of all final plans. The City
Landscape Architect of the City of Chula Vista will approve all final landscape drawings
and specifications prior to issuing grading permits. The Landscape Architect will be
responsible for the preparation of an installation cost estimate including maintenance and
monitoring costs for the project which will be used for bonding and bidding purposes.
17
/L/1 ~tj/~
..
-
The revegetation designer shall have the following minimum qualifications:
...
. Training and/or local experience in growing the native plant species used in the
project (either in a nursery setting or in the field).
...
. Knowledge of the vegetation associations proposed for the revegetation effort,
including species identity, general composition, overstory, understory, and
species ecological positions relative to the water table.
...
...
. A minimum of 2 years of practical horticultural experience, Le., maintenance
and/or growing/propagating native plants.
...
. Knowledge of wildlife habitat requirements.
...
4.3 CONTRACTOR EDUCATION
...
The revegetation plans will be implemented under the supervision of a revegetation
designer/horticultural monitor (see Section 6.2) knowledgeable of Diegan coastal sage
scrub and riparian scrub ecosystems in southern California. The revegetation
designer/horticultural monitor will meet with all project contractors prior to the onset of
construction activities to ensure that they are fully aware of the revegetation specifications.
The focus will be on identifying revegetation areas, any other areas designated as
construction-free zones, and permitted and prohibited activities in or near the revegetation
site.
..
...
...
...
4.4 PROTECTION DURING CONSTRUCTION
4.4.1 COASTAL SAGE SCRUB MITIGATION PROTECTION
...
It will probably not be necessary to protect existing coastal sage scrub vegetation during
installation of the mitigation plan, however, fencing shall be installed ifrecommended by
the revegetation designer.
...
...
...
..
18
J1/J~ ~/k
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4.4.2 WETLAND MITIGATION PROTECTION
It is not anticipated that fencing will be necessary to protect existing riparian vegetation
during installation of the wetland mitigation plan. But it may be reconunended if necessary
by the revegetation designer.
4.4.3 FACILITY CONSTRUCTION PROTECTION
Existing wetland vegetation and other desirable coastal sage scrub vegetation will be
protected during the actual facility construction process by temporary construction fencing.
Construction fencing may be necessary to limit access to the construction areas. It will
assure that the existing wetland and coastal sage scrub vegetation and mitigation sites are
not damaged during actual facility construction. The revegetation designer will flag the
limits of the work area prior to grading or clearing at the site. A 6-foot temporary chain
link fence may be erected at these limits as directed by the revegetation designer. This
fencing will remain in place until all grading and/or construction work is completed, at
which time, upon approval of the revegetation designer, it may be removed if other
construction activities will not harm existing vegetation.
The project revegetation designer will certify in writing to the City of Chula Vista Planning
Department that the limits of the work area have been properly flagged and/or fenced before
the contractor may proceed with facility construction. If at any time workmen or machines
damage vegetation outside the limits of work, the contractor will bear the full cost of having
the revegetation designer complete a restoration plan for the area as well as the costs for
monitoring the success of the additional revegetation area according to the same standards
as the original revegetation work. The contractor will also be responsible for repairing all
damage to protective fencing within one week of such damage.
The project revegetation designer will have final discretion in all protective fencing and may
at any time require additional fencing if it is deemed necessary to protect existing native
vegetation or the revegetation areas.
Only construction equipment necessary to accomplish the installation will be allowed at the
site. Workers' vehicles will be parked outside the construction areas in appropriate
construction staging areas, and all equipment will be removed form the site as soon as its
task is completed. No vehicular fluids will be added or changed onsite.
19
/ i IJ ~ '1/ ?
...
...
4.4.4 Post-construction Protection
...
After construction is completed temporary fencing may be removed. It is not expected that
further fencing will be necessary to protect the sensitive resources around the OTC
boathouse facility. However. if significant damage occurs to either coastal sage scrub or
wetland vegetation during the 5-year monitoring period at either of the mitigation sites, the
revegetation designer may recommend fencing where appropriate to control further damage
of this sort. The fIrst post-construction monitoring report to the City of Chula Vista will
certify that this fencing has been completed to the satisfaction of the project revegetation
designer. The purpose of the temporary fencing will be to keep all non-maintenance
personnel and vehicles out of the mitigation areas at all times. In general this will mean that
one to three sides of revegetation sites will be fenced. Additional fencing will be added
during the monitoring period whenever the revegetation designer/horticultural monitor
determines that it is necessary to eliminate human or vehicular entry into the project site.
All temporary fencing will be completely removed from the revegetation site at the end of
the 5-year monitoring period or when the project is given fInal approval.
...
...
-
...
...
-
4.5 SITE SOIL CONDITIONS
...
4.5.1 Coastal Sage Scrub Mitigation Areas
-
Only soils determined by the revegetation designer to be proper for coastal sage scrub plant
material establishment and growth will be utilized in the coastal sage scrub mitigation areas.
No organic or inorganic debris shaH be buried onsite. The revegetation
designer/horticultural monitor will be the [mal judge in these matters, and shall evaluate all
soils analysis results submitted by the contractor.
...
...
....
4.5.2 Wetland Mitigation Areas
...
The wetland areas shall be evaluated by the revegetation designer/horticultural monitor prior
to planting for determination of appropriate wetland soils and proper hydrology.
...
...
...
20
JI-! f) ~ 1/ rt
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4.6 PLANT PALETTE DESIGN
This section defines the revegetation planting palettes for the required mitigation types and
shows where they will be applied conceptually to the site revegetation areas. The plant
palettes define the species, spacing, percent composition, and approximate number of
plants per acre for container plantings. For hydroseeded species, the number of pounds
per acre to be applied and the required percentage of pure live seed is specified.
Two habitat types will be created for this project to address the specific mitigation
requirements, as previously discussed. These are Diegan coastal sage scrub (Le.,
3.6 acres), and wetland (Le., tree plantings of Fremont cottonwood within .3 of an acre of
area) .
4.6.1 Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub Mitigation
An area of 3.6 acres of currently barren slope and transitional planting area at the southwest
corner of the OTC property has been chosen as the site for the intended mitigation plantings
of Diegan coastal sage scrub vegetation.
This area has been chosen due to its proximity to the existing high-quality Diegan coastal
sage scrub vegetation contiguous to the site boundary in the Salt Creek open space area (see
Figure 6b). The intent of the designed plant palette for this area is to create a compatible
slope planting of sage scrub vegetation which will mimic as close as possible the adjacent
vegetation, such that potentially viable California gnatcatcher habitat is created. It is thus
anticipated that the overall habitat of the area will be enhanced through this addition. The
plant materials included in this plant palette are the predominant species found in the area
and include the following species which will be planted from containers (see Table I):
California sagebrush (Artemisia californica), California buckwheat (Eriogonum
fasciculatum), bladdetpOd (Isomeris arborea), coastal prickly pear (Opuntia littoralis), coast
cholla (Opuntia prolifera), lemonade berry (Rhus integrifolia), and white sage (Salvia
apiana). The vegetation cover will be established from a combination of container plantings
and seed. Thirty percent (30%) of mature cover will be planted from containers. These
plantings will be mainly I-gallon nursery stock, except the lemonade berry which will be
5-gallon stock and the two Opuntia species which will be planted from cuttings. It is
intended that these cuttings be taken from existing indigenous species from the adjacent
area in an effort to maintain local genetic consistency.
21
)t!/J - JI;1
....
...
:c
..
E-<
E-<
rJ:l
-
...l
~
rool~
z->=
_OJ
<.2
E-<'"
z..
O~
U';
..
i:l:lC
;:10
~"
U~
rJ:l'c
roolt
,,;.
<8
rJ:l~
...l=
<f'l
E-<",
rJ:l'-
<-
0"
u-3
~
z
<
"
rool
-
~
rool
E-<
E-<
rool
...l
~
E-<
Z
<
...l
~
Z
o
-
E-<
<
"
-
E-<
-
~
z
o
-
E-<
<
E-<
rool
"
rool
;;.-
rool
~
g
"=
"~
'"
~
o
U
~
."
0<
z~
I:l
"~ Il
-"~
c:::,,-,
o
U
bIl!l
.5 c
~8
""c:::
"-'0
~
z
j
~
Z
"
!Ej
5
"0
"-'
~~~~~~iQ
Oll"l'<l"<"><">O
lI"l N -
lI")~NlI")lI")\c,
N \C "'l:t l(') lI") "ld"
0\ '<I"
- -
'" '"
cJcJca ~~c;.;
bIl bIl bIl "il "il bIl bIl
___ =' =lI")....-4
c.> c.>
-----
<U <U <U <U <U
o c..> c..> 0 U
.~ .~ .~ .~ .~
-----
~ c::: ~ ~ c:::
('f':I M ~ M ('t')
~ ~
<U <U
c.> c.>
.~ .~
- -
~ ~
~ ~
\0 <">
~
=
=
....
t--
t--
'oC
....
...l
<
E-<
o
E-<
...
...
...
...
""
:i
..
-
.s
]
"~
""
~
...
...
-
'5 5
] ~ tiJ
~ g ~
"'.0 :8'.. 5'
...."B.c=.c.,
"~ "s e- "" ~ "i ~
a8.E3l"3 c:::!j
" ~1!l~~~:E
u.cc.>8.!l~
~
8 ~
.~ .~ ~ .~ ~ .~
~!:l ~1l~"'5
]i~~l~"~
"~"~"~ll]t
"'l: ~ ~ 0 0 Co:: c.:l
22
'"
..
~
...
<=
.,
~
"=
"'g
.,
i3
!
'"
<U
"5
ta
e
-
a
-a
'"
8
1;b
:e
.5
e
.g
~
-
.8
:a
~
'"
bIl
c:::
"J:1
..
c.>
=
<
...
...
...
...
-
...
...
...
...
-
-
/cj !J.,- 1/) 0
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
In addition to the above-mentioned container materials the remaining 70 percent of cover
will be accomplished through hydroseeding. The hydroseed mixture is composed of
similar compatible sage scrub species to provide additional density and erosion control
stability. The intended seed and slurry mix is shown on Table 2.
4.6.2 Wetland Mitigation
Due to the minor impacts to the existing freshwater marsh at the boathouse site, it has been
envisioned that the most useful mitigation planting for this loss would be the enhancement
of the existing riparian scrub at the edge of the wetland fringe along the lake shore
boundary. To accomplish this a strategy is proposed to plant a compatible native riparian
tree species, Fremont cottonwood (Populus fremontii), at a density of one tree every 30
feet on center (see Table 3). These will be planted in an undulating pattern to follow the
edge of the existing riparian scrub vegetation at the wetland fringe, northeast of the
boathouse site (see Figure 6a). These trees will be planted from 5-gallon nursery stock and
will be provided with a mulched planting basin. It is proposed that to provide for the
required .3 of an acre of mitigation area, a total of 20 trees will be necessary. No
additional shrub or ground cover species are being proposed since sufficient riparian scrub
understory vegetation exists at this location.
The final locations for the tree plantings will be coordinated between the landscape architect
and the revegetation designer, and will be shown on the final landscape plans.
4.7 PLANTING SPECIFICATIONS AND PLANT MATERIAL SOURCES
Hydroseeding will follow container planting. Hydroseeding will be done so as to avoid
damage to the container plantings. All damaged plant material shall be replaced "in-kind"
and of the same sizes and quantities as the original container plantings.
The landscape contractor will be responsible for obtaining the appropriate number and
species of plants specified on the plant palette tables. This will involve contracting with the
nursery, nurseries, or suppliers that will provide the plant materials and seed as far in
advance as necessary (but no later than four months prior to planting) to ensure the
availability of the plant materials and seed at the time of planting. The landscape contractor
will be required to provide written documentation to the revegetation designer/horticultural
23
}t//J- L/.J!
N
..
~
...
~
...
~
Q
r-l
r-l~
enl>ll
=
0..
~"Cl
Q~
...~
=..
"Cl
1l:I~
;;;l..c:
~~
u..c:
en..
..
r-l;.
~8
~ll<
....=
<"
E-.~
en
<'i
00
u~
~
z
<
~
r-l
...
Q
r-l
...
...
r-l
....
~
...
z
<
....
i:l.
Z
o
...
...
<
~
...
...
...
~
--
z
o
...
...
~
r-l
~
r-l
~
r-l
~
~~
~.e;
....
6
.a
.,
~.~
c3
>.
~~
.s
~
~
~
:9
~
z
~
8
~
z
u
!E
c
..
.0
CI)
O\r--r---n'\Ooo
" ..., -
o .,., 0 0 N 0
\0 \0 00 l(') ""d" V)
.,., 0 .,., 0 0 .,.,
--O\r--""=:t-
~ ~ ~ "l:t -q- "'d"1 ~
0;.. '" l:l
.;l .. c '" ~
]~j ~,g
to> ~ ~ G,) S
~.s"8 11 '"
.,.,~~c::g,
.Ei .13 .. ~ == .~
60>'B:,sQ
::S~~:E81a
u e .s.. ~ "" CI)
~
8 '"
.~ ~ .. .~
ti~ ~~]
:9 ~ ~ .13- ~ li!
~ .~.~~ .~.!
~ '"-l .;::j "'l \r :::
24
..
..
'"
OS
--
'"
..c:
-
..l
<
...
o
...
..
..
...
...
...
-
..
..
><
~
.;
~
-
Po
'"
~ ~
~~ ~
-!!.o ~
"'- iil
:9~ 1;l
~~:: e
0_ = ~
~-~ ..
.c ::. -a ,.Q
-~ g. ~
0;0-" ~
~-"8 OJ
~-;.. bIl
9 -a ~ .13
9'3 Po _1a
""","
::!.F=6 Po
I!) 6- ~
~~o-(,) .o-j
~ ~ 8:~ "8-e
~.o~ "'=
- =~
.,>< "6..6 13
~~Ja6'.~ ~
:9 N !1 '" '3 ..
0\;J....('f')8 ,.Q
N..c:;;;lo" g
~C,) -bl)
es'3iil:l.!'l "8
.s s N !::J.N 1;l
"8.t€~~ :E
~tt~~f;') F
..,
...
..
-
....
..
...
...
-
..
:I:
ai.o u-d 4i
*
...
)L/fI~ f))
...
I
I
I c:: ~
0 Q
"= "'"
"~ llI1 e
'"
I ! 8 "~
..... '"
""
"'"
"s
-
I ,;.;
"~
t;j
e ~
I "t.)
0< N
Z... \Q 6
'" "'"
l'>. g!,
"" -'"
I .. .... "s
.... .... ....
~ "" 0
...~ e
...lIl ..
... ~ l; Ii
I ~.s "~"~ oj ;j
""'" .... '0
Z" bll
..... z 8'" lI"l M
<.: < d
I ....... .. .,
Zc g.. 1
00 z
u'" "
0 .,
..., zE :E
... ... f-<
I .. .... bll'"
:E 0.. < "5 E .::: u
... ..... ~ g8 d
.... ....;. ... 0
<0 .... l'>. ..., .:::
~... ... "'c:: 0
I "'llI1 ~ 0 M
!::= - t;j
z
~~ 0 ]
Q.~ ... ;j
I .... "S.
Z..... < ] ~
<... .... ~
..0 "" ~
....~ ~ 6 i'l
I ""~ "" z
i?; ;> ! = ....
0 0
"" t.) ~
~ - "'"
I 8 j ~
cr
i!
I ~
'"
~
"-
I J "i! ~
~ il
t.) ~ -~
!E ~ .,
I 5 :s
"0 ~ ~
'" ll...
I
I 2S IL! /1-'-/Y}
...
..,
monitor from the nursery or supplier acknowledging that a contact growing agreement has
been established. This documentation must include the date of the contact and number and
type of plant materials and seed to be provided.
...
Contract growing should be conducted by a reputable and experienced native plant nursery
or seed company such as Tree of Life Nursery, San Juan Capistrano, California;
Mockingbird Nursery, Riverside, California; or S&S Seeds, Carpinteria, California.
...
...
Substitution of plant materials will generally not be allowed, and will only be considered at
the recommendation of the revegetation designer/horticultural monitor to the City
Landscape Architect and Parks Landscape Architect. No more than 10 percent of materials
specified may be substituted for at the time of installation. If insufficient plant materials are
not available then the commencement of the monitoring period will be delayed until they are
planted. The revegetation designer/horticultural monitor will also inspect all plants prior to
planting to determine that they are vigorous and disease-free. Only healthy, vigorous
plants will be planted. The contractor will be responsible for providing healthy replacement
materials in a timely fashion, if materials provided are deemed unacceptable.
...
...
~
...
Container plants will be planted using standard horticultural techniques, using a hole twice
the diameter of the root ball, the same depth as the container, and leaving the plant crown
approximately 2 inches above finish grade after planting.
...
...
Plants will be planted in soil that has been thoroughly watered before planting and then
watered in immediately after planting. The rootballs of container plants will also be wetted
before planting.
...
...,
All cottonwood trees shall be mulched with a minimum 48-inch diameter by 4-inch thick
layer of organic mulch. Type of mulch shall be as approved by the revegetation designer.
...
All planting installations shall conform to the requirements of the final landscape plans
prepared by the Landscape Architect and the intent of this mitigation plan and be approved
by the City Landscape Architect! of the City of Chula Vista.
"'"
...
...
! Note: All references to the City Landscape Architect shall also mean Parks Landscape Architect in cases
of open space maintenance by the City of Chula Vista.
...
26
Iff/-ljJ i
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4.8 IRRIGATION
All irrigation systems shall be installed as specified on the final irrigation plans prepared by
the Landscape Architect and as field directed by the revegetation designer/horticultural
monitor and be approved by the City Landscape Architect of the City of Chula Vista.
The contractor will ensure that sufficient water is supplied to the revegetated plants to
establish them for as long as is deemed necessary by the revegetation designer/horticultural
monitor. Additional irrigation measures may be necessary to achieve this.
Irrigated hydroseed areas must be kept sufficiently moist (perhaps as often as twice a day)
to allow seed germination during the ~8 week establishment period following planting.
Watering should then be reduced so as not to overwater container plantings.
Irrigation systems will eventually be phased out and withdrawn from the revegetation areas
as described in Section 5.3.3.
4.8.1 Diegan Coastal Sage Scrub Mitigation
The Diegan sage scrub mitigation areas shall be irrigated with temporary (2-year) irrigation
systems utilizing medium range gear driven rotor shrub spray heads. Where appropriate
smaller radius spray heads will be utilized. Systems shall be designed to provide
100 percent coverage to all revegetation areas and shall be circuited based upon similar site
elevation conditions. It is intended that these systems would be turned off at the end of the
second year, as determined by the revegetation designer, to allow the areas to transition to
survival on natural rainfall.
4.8.2 Wetland Mitigation Irrigation
Each tree shall be irrigated with temporary drip irrigation, supplied by multi-outlet emitters
providing a minimum of three emissions points evenly distributed around each tree
rootball. Supply piping shall be below grade, emitters shall be located in access boxes and
emitter tubing shall be securely staked in place above grade. The revegetation designer
shall determine when the system can be shut down in order to allow the plantings to
survive on existing water suppliles.
27
;11/ -L/.J5'
-
...
4.9 REPLACEMENT OF DEAD OR DISEASED PLANT MATERIALS
...
All container plant materials will be inspected by the revegetation designer/horticultural
monitor at 60 and 120 days after planting; all dead or diseased plants will be immediately
replaced with "in-kind" species by the landscape contractor. Thereafter, plantings will be
monitored and assessed once a year in the fall for five years after project installation; all
dead or diseased plants will be immediately replaced "in-kind" as directed by the
revegetation designer/horticultural monitor according to the Success Criteria, Section 6.5.
...
...
...
Hydroseed areas will be assessed at 120 days after application and annually thereafter for
five years. Hydroseed areas determined by the revegetation designer/horticultural monitor
not to have obtained 70 percent coverage or better are to be rehydroseeded at the landscape
contractor's expense at 120 days, and annually thereafter if needed at the owner's expense.
Timing of the rehydroseeding is subject to the discretion of the revegetation designer/
horticultural monitor.
...
...
...
4.10 WEED CONTROL
During and after construction, weedy species determined by the revegetation designer/
horticultural monitor to be inconsistent with the revegetation goals will be hand-removed on
a continuing basis. A 12-inch weed-free zone will be maintained around all container
plantings for the first year after planting. Any herbicide use will be subject to the discretion
of the revegetation designer/horticultural monitor.
...
...
...
4.11 PEST CONTROL
...
Pesticide use will be as directed by the revegetation designer/horticultural monitor and as
approved by the City of Chula Vista City Landscape Architect and Parks Landscape
Architect. Pesticide use will generally be avoided if possible. All pesticide applications
shall be conducted by a certified Pest Control Advisor.
...
...
4.12 PRUNING/STAKING
...
Pruning and staking will be done only if recommended by the revegetation designer/
horticultural monitor but is generally not expected to be necessary. Any staking used is to
be removed by the end of the 5-year monitoring period.
....
...
28
;1ft. ~2JI
...
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
4.13 FERTILIZATION AND PLANTING BACKFILL
Only fertilization in the backfill mix of the container plantings, and the slurry mix of the
hydroseed, will be utilized. Additional broadcast fertilization will be avoided in order to
reduce unnecessary weed growth. All container plants shall be fertilized at the time of
planting with "Agriform" (20-10-5), 21-gram fertilizer tablets (or approved equal at the rate
of 2 per I-gallon, 3 per 5-gallon and 5 per 15-gallon. In addition Osmocote (18-6-12), at
the rate of 7 lbs per cubic yard of backfill mix, shall also be incorporated of the time of
planting. The hydroseed slurry mix shall incorporate a preplant fenilizer Urea
formaldehyde (45-0-0) at 50 lbs/acre, and the fertilizer (0-36-0), plus (19 percent) popcorn
sulphur, at 150Ibs/acre.
5.0 MAINTENANCE PROGRAM
5.1 PURPOSE
The intent of this program is to ensure the successful revegetation of the Diegan coastal
sage scrub and the wetland fringe/riparian scrub habitats in accordance with the goals of the
revegetation plan.
5.2 MAINTENANCE/MONITORING PERIOD
Maintenance/monitoring of the project area shall occur for a minimum of five years after
installation and shall begin following the l20-day establishment period, based upon final
construction approval by the revegetation designer. Provisions will be made at the end of
the five-year period for the takeover and ongoing future maintenance of the area, before the
project is certified as successful by the CDFG (wetland mitigation only) and City of Chula
Vista (see Section 5.3.11). The Principal Planner of the City of Chula Vista Planning
Depanment shall determine that the appropriate maintenance provisions have been
arranged.
29
r/ II - 1--/.2 7
....
...
5.3 MAINTENANCE REQUIREMENTS
...
This maintenance program is designed to ensure that proper practices are followed in
establishing and maintaining the coastal sage scrub and riparian scrub habitats.
Requirements of the maintenance program are discussed below in Sections 5.3.1-5.3.11.
...
5.3.1 Contractor Education
....
Provisions will be made for the maintenance contractor education such that proper
implementation of the maintenance program is achieved. This will consist of an initial
onsite meeting between the contractor and the revegetation designer/horticultura1 monitor
followed by quarterly meetings for the five-year monitoring period following the initial
installation. More frequent meetings will be held, if considered necessary by the
revegetation designer/horticultura1 monitor.
-
...
..
5.3.2 Dead Plant Replacement
...
Container plants that die will be replaced "in-kind" at the appropriate ratios, at 6 months,
1 year, and then yearly thereafter in the fall, during the course of the five-year maintenance
and monitoring period, as specified in Section 6.5 Success Criteria.
...
...
5.3.3 Irrigation Maintenance and Withdrawal
....
The maintenance contractor shall be responsible for the regular maintenance and ongoing
repair of all irrigation systems to assure that they function as designed and that all plant
materials are afforded adequate water. The contractor shall submit a watering schedule for
the various planting areas for evaluation by the revegetation designer/horticultural monitor,
and shall make system adjustments as directed.
"'l
""I
A process of phased irrigation withdrawal will be analyzed by the revegetation designer
beginning two summers after planting. This withdrawal phase will be regulated and
specified by the revegetation designer/horticultural monitor, based upon the status of the
various planting areas, and will be completed at least one year prior to the end of the 5-year
monitoring phase. It is expected that summer waterings during the establishment phase
within the Diegan sage scrub areas will occur about once a week. Wetland mitigation
plantings will be watered on an ongoing basis. The ultimate goal is to have the mitigation
..
...
...
....
30
l~fJ- ~)ct
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
plantings survive a minimum of one summer without supplemental water, before final
acceptance at the end of the 5-year monitoring period. All systems which are abandoned
shall have all above ground components removed from the site, including all valves, heads
and control wire connections.
5.3.4 Pest Control
Insects and plant diseases (Le., pests), will be monitored during the 5-year maintenance/
monitoring period. Plants that are severely diseased or infected will be removed and
replaced to prevent the spread of the disease. Pesticides will be avoided unless
recommended for special problems by the revegetation designer/horticultural monitor, in
consultation with a licensed Pest Control Advisor, and as approved by the City of Chula
Vista Landscape Section. Biological control agents such as insect predators may be used at
the discretion of the revegetation designer/horticultural monitor, as approved by the City of
Chula Vista Landscape Section. Generally pesticides are not expected to be used and a
high level of pest damage will be tolerated before pest control measures will be considered.
5.3.5 Weed Control
Weeds should be cleared periodically but at no less than one month intervals during the
five-year maintenance/monitoring period at the direction of revegetation designer/
horticultural monitor. In general, undesirable or weedy species include non-native plants
that can degrade the wetland and coastal sage scrub communities by adversely competing
with the desired species. Such weeds shall be controlled up to 100 feet from any
mitigation planting edges.
5.3.6 Herbicides
Herbicide use will be limited to only the most noxious species that are difficult to eliminate
by hand-clearing, and will be used only under the specific recommendation and supervision
of a qualified horticulturist and licensed Pest Control Advisor. In addition the use of
herbicides must be approved by the City of Chula Vista Landscape Section.
31
/1/J / L(cJ I
...
...
5.3.7 Fertilization
...
Applications of an all-purpose broadcast fertilizer may be called for by the revegetation
designer/horticultural monitor on the hydro seeded slope revegetation areas, in order to
speed initial growth or as a remedial measure. This is not expected to be necessary due to
the fertilizers incorporated in the hydroseed slurry mix. These applications shall occur in
the autumn or spring months, following the manufacturers recommended application rates
and only as directed by the revegetation designer/horticultural monitor.
...
...
..,
5.3.8 Staking and Caging
Staking of some of the cottonwood tree plantings may be necessary but will be avoided if
possible. Any stakes used shall be removed as soon as the tree can adequately support
itself. All stakes shall be removed before the completion of the 5-year monitoring program
or earlier, as recommended by the revegetation designer/horticultural monitor. All removed
stakes shall be disposed of legally offsite. Wire caging of tree and shrub species may be
required for adequate plant protection but will be determined as required by the revegetation
designer/horticultural monitor based upon actual field conditions. All cages shall be
removed as soon as practical but before the end of the 5-year monitoring period.
...
...,
...
...
5.3.9 Trash and Debris Removal
...,
All trash and construction debris will be removed by hand from the mitigation areas. Trash
includes any and all manmade materials, equipment, or debris dumped, thrown, or left
within the mitigation areas. Such trash will be removed and properly disposed of on an as-
needed basis, but at no less than four month intervals.
....
....
5.3.10 Habitat Access Control
-
Temporary or permanent fencing will be erected around the coastal sage scrub mitigation
area and adjacent gnatcatcher habitat, if necessary, to ensure revegetation success and/or
prevent disturbance to the habitat areas. The necessity of fencing will be determined by the
revegetation designer/horticultural monitor and the City Landscape Architect of the City of
Chula Vista at the time of planting, based upon anticipated encroachment (see Section 4.4).
...
...
...
....
32
JLI f1 / LfjV
-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
5.3.11 Future Maintenance/Management Objectives
Once the success standards for the project have been met and no further mitigation
measures are required by the City of Chula Vista or CDFG (i.e., presumably at the end of
the five-year monitoring period), the City of Chula Vista and City of San Deigo shall accept
and designate the mitigation areas as dedicated open space. All elements of the maintenance
program will continue except irrigation, plant replacement, and pest control. A new
maintenance contract shall be established for the future long-term maintenance of the
mitigation areas. Particular atrention shall be given to continuing the removal of trash from
the area and elimination of any exotic invading weed species identified as undesirable.
It is expected that the Diegan coastal sage scrub mitigation area will ultimately be under the
long-term management of the City of Chula Vista as part of the Salt Creek dedicated open
space area. The wetland mitigation area is expected to be managed by the City of San
Diego as part of the Otay Lakes management plan. Long-term management plans will be
developed in consultation with the City of Chula Vista, which will be used to manage the
revegetation areas and will incorporate all elements necessary to maintain viable wetland
and coastal sage scrub habitats areas. The management plans will be subject to review and
acceptance by the revegetation designer, CDFG, the City of San Diego and the City of
Chula Vista before final turnover of the project.
6.0 MONITORING PROGRAM
The monitoring program for both mitigation areas will be administered by the City of Chula
Vista.
6.1 PURPOSE
The intent of the monitoring program is to evaluate the progress and success of the
revegetation effort at regular intervals so that remedial measures may be implemented in a
timely fashion to achieve the revegetation objectives by the end of the five-year monitoring
period. This program will also aid in the assessment of the resultant biological value of the
mitigation areas. Evaluation of project progress and success will be made by the collection
and analysis of quantitative and qualitative data and their comparison with project success
standards. These findings and recommendations for remedial action will be included in the
yearly status reports to the Planning Department of the City of Chula Vista and the CDFG,
made at 12, 24, 36, 48, and 60 months after project installation. These reports will be sent
33
)L(/l -if} I
-
-
to the City of Chula Vista Planning Department and CDFG for review and approval. IT the
mitigation sites are installed as separate phases then yearly reports will be made on each site
separately.
-
6.2 HORTICULTURAL MONITORING
....
A horticulturist having the following minimum qualifications will perform all horticultural
monitoring. The horticultural monitor will have training and/or local experience in the
horticulture of the native plant species used in the project, and knowledge of the vegetation
associations to be created on site. A minimum of two years of practical horticultural
experience is required, along with two years study and two years field experience in
landscape design and construction. It is desirable that the horticulturist also have at least
one year of experience in designing native revegetation plans in California.
....
....
..
....
Plantings will be inspected by the horticultural monitor at least once every two weeks
during installation and at least six times during the first year after planting. Thereafter, the
horticultural monitor will inspect the plantings nine (9) times a year for four more years as
necessary until the vegetation is deemed successfully established at the end of the 5-year
monitoring period. The field inspections shall note any plants that need replacing and the
relative health of the plant communities. The evaluations shall be included a yearly status
report to the Planning Department of the City of Chula Vista to be submitted in January. It
will include any recommendations for remedial measures necessary to improve the health of
the plants and the plant community. Recommendations will also be communicated on an as
needed basis to the City, CDFG and landscape contractor for immediate implementation
both during installation and for the five-year monitoring period.
....
....
....
..
....
6.3 BOTANICAL MONITORING
..
A biologist having the following minimum qualifications will conduct all botanical
monitoring. The biological monitor (or consultant team) will have a broad background in
vegetation sampling. The biological monitor will have at least two years of local experience
in identifying! sampling native vegetation, a good knowledge of the ecological relationships
of the vegetative associations on site, and a minimum of a Bachelor's degree with a focus in
botany/ecology.
..
..
..
..,
34
;ff!/ 1/3)
....
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
Botanical monitoring will be conducted concurrent with horticultural monitoring, Le.,
annually at years 3-5 after project installation. The first assessment of the mitigation/
revegetation areas will be conducted at the beginning of the third year to establish vegetative
baseline data. In addition, three 30 meter belt or line transects shall be taken within the
adjacent coastal sage scrub area in order to determine percent cover of the various existing
species. This information will then be used to modify the established success criteria if
necessary. Thereafter, monitoring will be conducted annually between June and
September.
Survival will be determined for all container plants on a yearly basis. Survival will be
measured by direct counts per the standards set forth in Section 6.5. Percent cover will be
determined for the revegetation areas on a yearly basis. Percent cover will be estimated
using 30-meter belt or line transects placed 4 per acre.
At each botanical monitoring visit, permanent photo documentation will be conducted at
specified vantage points to provide overall project views of the areas being evaluated.
Reports summarizing this field data will be submitted annually in January along with the
horticultural reports to the City of Chula Vista Planning Department and CDFG.
6.4 SUCCESS CRITERIA
Success of the mitigation areas will be based on percent canopy cover, survival of container
plantings and hydroseed success as indicated below.
6.4.1 Cover Standards: Coastal Sage Scrub Mitigation
Percent cover of the coastal sage scrub species (including volunteers, but only coastal sage
scrub species) shall meet the following milestones: 30 percent cover by the end of the
second year, 40 percent cover by the end of the third year, 50 percent cover by the end of
the fourth year, and 60 percent cover by end of the fifth year. The 60 percent cover at the
end of five years shall be broken down as follows: 50 percent from Artemisia calif.,
25 percent cover from Eriogonum fascialatum, and 25 percent from other coastal sage
scrub species. These percentages shall be determined via the horticultural monitoring
Section 6.2 and botanical monitoring transect evaluations outlined in Section 6.3.
3S
PiA - tj"J)
..
6.4.2 Hydroseeding Success: Coastal Sage Scrub Mitigation
..
All hydroseeded areas shall achieve 70 percent coverage and/or adequate erosion control
protection after 120 days, as evaluated by the revegetation designer/horticultural monitor.
Reseeding will be repeated annually as often as necessary during the five-year monitoring
period until this goal is achieved. Seeding will be done at the times specified by the
revegetation designer/horticultural monitor.
..
...
Percentage of hydroseed cover within the coastal sage scrub mitigation areas will be
determined on a visual basis by the revegetation designer/horticultural monitor. If
requested by any regulatory agencies or hydroseed contractor, as proof of the need to
reseed selected areas, percent cover will be determined for five 1-m quadrats in the disputed
areas. The quadrats will be placed by a qualified horticulturist to accurately reflect percent
cover in the areas of concern.
..
...
..
6.4.3
Container Plantings Success:
Mitigation
Coastal Sage Scrub/Wetland
..
Various survival rate percentages for all container plantings must be achieved each year, for
five years after planting, before the project is deemed successful. Replacement plantings
will be used as necessary to achieve this survival rate on a yearly basis. As a final measure
of success, a 90 percent survival rate for trees and 80 percent for shrubs must be achieved
for one summer without supplemental irrigation prior to the end of the 5-year maintenance/
monitoring period. Substitute species may be used as replacement plantingsonly with the
approval of the project revegetation designer/horticulturist monitor. Similarly, naturally
invading seedlings may be allowed to replace dead container plantings only at the discretion
of the revegetation designer/horticultural monitor.
...
...
...
...
..
100 percent healthy container plantings, at 6 month and 12 month
intervals.
Year 2: 100 percent survival of tree plantings and 90 percent survival of shrub
plantings.
Years 3-5: 95 percent survival of tree plantings and 80 percent survival of shrub
plantings.
Year 1:
...
...
...
...
36
/1f1, ~'Pl
..
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
6.4.4 Exotic Weed Species Removal
Adequate control of all exotic invaded weed species shall be required during the course of
the 5-year monitoring period, as directed by the revegetation designer/horticultural monitor.
100% removal of any pernicious species specified by the revegetation designer (e.g.,
tamarisk) or 80% removal of all other weeds specified by the revegetation designer shall be
required throughout the 5-year monitoring period.
6.5 REMEDIAL MEASURES
Should success standards fail to be met, the revegetation designer shall recommend
remedial measures to correct factors limiting the mitigations. The remedial measures that
might be called for during the monitoring period are defined here. However, final
recommendations will be left to the discretion of the revegetation designer/honicultural
monitor. No single measure is expected to be appropriate in all circumstances. Remedial
measures may include some or all of the following:
1. Increase or decrease the irrigation or change its frequency to improve growth.
2. Modify the irrigation system to compensate for changes in plant growth or to
correct problems that develop.
3. Fertilize to address nutrient deficiency symptoms and/or to help speed growth.
4. Clear a vegetation-free zone and mulch around container stock to reduce
competition and speed growth.
5. Control weeds and other pests to reduce competition and improve vigor. (Note:
specific pest control recommendations require a Pest Control Adviser's
License. )
6. Make additional p1antings, seedings and/or substitute species to meet success
standards.
7. Replant dead and/or poorly growing container plants.
37
Jtj4 ~;j35
...
...
8. Selective pruning only as necessary to improve sprinkler covetage, induce
bushiness of leggy plants, favor the growth of one species over another, etc.
pet the direction of the revegetation designer/horticultural monitor.
....
6.6 FINAL PROJECT RESOLUTION
...
If the project meets all success standards at the end of the five-year monitoring period, the
mitigation will be considered a success and the maintenance and monitoring program shall
cease. Should the mitigation fall short of the standards, the maintenance and monitoring
program shall be extended one full year at a time, until the standards are met, or until an
alternative agreement is negotiated with the City of Chula Vista and CDFG, if that is
detetmined to be appropriate.
....
...
...
Should the mitigation effort meet all goals prior to the end of the five-year monitoring
period, the City of Chula Vista and CDFG may terminate the monitoring period early if all
parties agree.
....
....
6.6.1 Coastal Sage Scrub Mitigation Areas
...
It is envisioned that the Diegan coastal sage scrub mitigation areas will be administeted over
the long term by the City of Chula Vista as part of the Salt Creek open space area.
....
6.6.2 Wetland Mitigation Areas
....
It is envisioned that the wetland mitigation area will be administered by the City of San
Diego over the long term as part of the Otay Lakes management
....
7.0 REFERENCES
....
Ogden 1991. Olympic Training Center, Supplemental E.I.R.
....
....
,
....
,
...
38
JilJ/1/3&
....
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
APPENDIX A
ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS (ACOE) LETTER
REGARDING 404 PERMIT AUTHORIZATION,
DATED NOVEMBER 27, 1991
1J//J-tiJ?
DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY
~o, ANGelo1l ClIS1'IlIICT. co..,. 0' IHGINIIR.
NoveMber 27, 1991
".111."'0
"T"':'IH'TI~oP
Office of the Chief
Regulatory Branch
McKinley sopac
Attn: Lauri.e McKinley
416 University Avenue,
San Diego, California
suite 200
92103
Gentlemen:
This is in reply to your letter (No. 92-097-EW) dated October
29, 1991 concerning our permit aUthority over your proposal to
construct a .01 acre sand path adjacent to the Lower otay
reservoir, City of Chula vista, San Diego County, California.
Regulations for our permit proqram, published in the Federal
Reqister, include part 330 - Nationwide Permits (see the
enclosure). ~e Corps of Enqineers has determined that your
proposed activity complies with the terms and conditions of the
nationwide permit at Part 330.5(&)(26) for discharges of dredged
or fill material into waters of the United States, including
wetlands, that are located above the headwaters or are isolated
waters and which would cause 108s or substantial adverse
modification of less than one acre of such waters.
As lonq as you comply with the nationwide permit conditions
described in Part 330.5(b) an individual permit is not required.
This letter of verification is valid until the nationwide permit
is mOdified, reissued, or revoked. All the nationwide permits
are scheduled to be modified, reissued or revoked prior to 13
January 1992. It is incumbent upon you to remain informed of
changes to the nationwide permits. We will issue a public notice
announcing' the change. when they occur. Furthermore, it you
commence or are under oontract to commence this activity before
the date the nationwide permit is modified or revoked, you will
have twelve months from the date of the modification or
revocation to complete the actiVity under the present terms and
conditions of this nationwide permit.
)ll/l~ tj3~
~c~ tIC '1 ~Oi~~
WWJ I W'-
...
...
. ,
-2-
...
...
A n~tionwide permit does not grant any property rights or
exclusive privileges. Also, it does not authorize any injury to
the property or rights of others or authorize interference with
any existing or proposed Federal project. Furthermore, it does
not oDviate the need to oDtain other Federal, state, or local
authorizations required by law.
If you have any questions please contact ElizaJ:>eth White of
my staff at (619) 455-9422.
....
...
..,
Sincerely,
(!it.::J.r~ '
Chief, Southern Section
...
..,
..,
Iilnoloaure
...
-
...
...
....
...
-
...
/Lj/) ~1/3'/
...
;>41.
PETITIONS
ROWING AND CANOE/KAYAK BOATHOUSE
FOR
U.S. OLYMPIC TRAINING CENTER
Outside San Diego County 223
Inside San Diego County 1213
Total 1436
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item J '-/8
Meeting Date 7/28/92
ITEM TITLE: 1J ,Public Hearing: Conditional Use Permit PCC-92-04; Request to
establ ish Olympic Training Center (OTC) Boathouse on westerly
shore of lower Otay Lake - San Diego National Sports Training
Foundation
C Resolution liJ?3 OApproving PCC-92-04 and Certifying the
'Environmental Impact Report No. 90-12, and making certain CEQA
findings, approving and adopting the Mitigation Monitoring
Program and Statement of Overriding Considerations for the
Olympic Training ce~ter Bo thouse jpfi:!"
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Planning ,/! f~'
REVIEWED BY: City ManagerJlt ~ .~ (4/Sths Vote: Yes_No_!....)
The request is to establish the Olympic Training Center Boathouse facility on
3.7 acres on the westerly shore of lower Otay Lake, directly east of the main
ISO-acre Olympic Training Center (OTC) site. The facility would provide
year-round training of international class American athletes in canoeing,
kayaking and rowing.
Certification of the final ErR on the project, EIR-90-12, is the preceding
item on the agenda.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the resolution approving PCC-92-04.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: On July 8, 1992, the Planning Commission
voted 6-0 to recommend approval of PCC-92-04.
DISCUSSION:
The Boathouse has been an integral component of the OTC proposal from the
beginning, but the area east of Wueste Road was not originally intended to be
annexed to the City, and thus the Boathouse had not been i ncl uded in the
approved OTC SPA Plan and prezoning. lAFCO subsequently required the
boundari es of the annexat i on to be extended to the shore 1 i ne of Lower Otay
lake, which has necessitated that the Boathouse be considered separately by
way of this conditional use permit.
The City of San Diego owns the Lower Otay lake Reservoir and surrounding
lakefront areas including the Boathouse site. Accordingly, the applicant must
secure approval of a lease agreement with the San Diego City Council. The
schedule of necessary actions by the several advisory or approval bodies is as
follows:
May 18, 1992:
The Chula Vista Resource Conservation
Commi ss i on voted unanimously to
recommend cert ifi cat i on of the Boathouse
EIR (EIR-90-12).
June 10, 1992:
The San Diego Facilities Committee voted
unanimously to endorse the project
design.
/'1P- /
June 17, 1992:
June 24, 1992:
July 1, 1992:
July 6, 1992:
July 8, 1992:
July 27, 1992:
July 28, 1992:
ExistinQ site characteristics
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date 7/28/92
The Chula Vista Planning Commission held
a public hearing on the draft ErR.
The San Diego Public Facilities and
Recreation Committee voted unanimously
to recommend that the San Diego City
Council approve the project.
The Chul a Vi sta
voted unanimously
ErR.
Planning Commission
to cert ify the fi na 1
The San Diego City Council voted
unanimously to certify the final ErR and
approve the project and property lease.
The Chula Vista Planning Commission
voted unanimously to recommend approval
of the conditional use permit.
The Chul a Vi sta Des i gn Revi ew Committee
will consider the project design.
The Chula Vista City Council will
consider certification of the final ErR
and the conditional use permit.
The project site is presently vacant open space fronting on the westerly
shoreline of the lower Otay lake Reservoir, directly east of the main Olympic
Training Center site. land uses immediately surrounding the site include open
space and Wueste Road to the west, the lake to the east, and open space to the
north and south. The City of San Diego boat launch facil ity also fronts on
the westerly shoreline approximately three-quarters-of-a-mile south of the
project site.
Pro Dosed use
The Boathouse facil ity woul d cons i st of 13,500 sq. ft. of bui 1 di ng area, and
18,000 sq. ft. of deck area on 3.7 acres, plus 0.07 water surface acres to
include a 3,000 sq. ft. floating dock and ramp. Access to the site would be
provided by "Boathouse Road" from Wueste Road. Thirty-eight (38) parking
spaces woul d be di stri buted along the access road and associ ated dri veways.
The buil di ng, deck and associ ated 1 and area is under the juri sdi ct i on of the
Ci ty of Chul a Vi sta. The 1 ake and its use for trai ni ng and the boat docki ng
facility are under the jurisdiction of the City of San Diego.
/t/tJ~eJ
Page 3, Item
Meeting Date 7/28/92
The Boathouse facility would include boat, canoe and kayak storage, equipment
and general storage, lockers, showers and offi ces, and a repair shop to be
shared by both the rowing and kayaking program. The 18,000 sq. ft. deck would
be used primarily for preparing and cleaning boats. Meetings and related
office functions would occur in the boathouse and the ground level deck and
grass areas would provide viewing areas and warm-up space for coaches,
athletes and visitors.
Proiect Activities Summarv
Otay lake is recognized first as one of San Diego's water storage facilities.
It is owned and operated by the City of San Di ego Water Ut il it i es Department
(WUD). The WUD thus has primary responsibility of uses and activities on and
around the lake. Uses of the lake (other than water storage) generally
include: fishing, hunting, recreational row boating and other man-powered
boating such as kayaking and canoeing, sail ing and navy hel icopter search and
rescue training.
The OTC Boathouse project would include sports training activities associated
with Olympic canoeing, kayaking and rowing. The 2,000 meter training course
and time tri a 1 s course wi 11 be located in the western lower 1 eg of the
reservoir. The course which begins about 600 feet north of the inlet
structure of the lake and ends just west of North Point consists of a series
of buoys in a double 1 ine, spaced 100 meters apart. When not in use, the
cable 1 ines rest on or near the bottom of the lake; when the course is in
place, the 1 ines are raised to about 6 - 10 feet below the surface. The
training course will be in place all year, being dropped to the bottom of the
Reservoir when necessary. Training would occur both within the course and in
other areas of the lakes (please refer to project exhibits).
Trainina Schedules
It is estimated by the applicant that training will occur year round. In
addition to the training boats, between 2 and 4 launches will be utilized
daily by coaches on the water. During hunting season (mid-October through
mid-January), OTC activities will be prohibited in morning hours on Wednesdays
and Saturdays when hunting is allowed. Training time for rowers and paddlers
is primarily concentrated in a few hours in the early morning and again in
1 ate afternoon, wi th addi t i ona 1 workouts occasi ona lly duri ng the 1 unch hour.
It is expected that the boathouse will provide team training for up to 30
rowers and 30 canoei sts and/or kayakers year round. Of these 60 athletes,
about half would 1 ive at the OTC main site facil ities, and the other half
would live off-site and drive to the boathouse each day (thus the proposed 38
parking spaces). Training becomes most intense during spring and early summer
months in preparation for the Word Championships in late summer.
ANALYSIS:
The proposed Boathouse facility has been an essential component of the overall
plans for the Olympic Training Center since the beginning. The opportunity to
11!5~3
Page 4, Item
Meeting Date 7/28/92
provide training for rowers and paddlers was a primary consideration in the
decision of the United States Olympic Committee to choose the site adjoining
Lower Otay Lake.
The Supplemental EIR for this project (EIR-90-l2) indicates that training
activities could effect other uses of the lake such as fishing and hunting
activities. These potential impacts, along with potential impacts associated
with the construction and operation of the Boathouse facility, have been
mitigated in the Mitigation Monitoring Program for EIR-90-l2, and these
measures have been incorporated into the conditions of approval. It should be
noted that the City of San Diego has jurisdiction and primary control over use
of the docking facil ity and operations on the lake, and thus the mitigation
measures related to training activities on the lake will be implemented and
controlled by the City of San Diego.
The one impact found in EIR-90-l2 not to be mitigable to below a level of
significance is visual impact. The EIR found that "The aesthetic atmosphere
of the site and surrounding area is that of the rural Otay Reservoir and
undeveloped nearby hillsides. Given the natural aesthetics of the lake
environment, the Boathouse structure would create significant impacts to views
from aport i on of Wueste Road to the site and from the Lower Otay Reservoi r.
Any development in the now pri st i ne envi ronment woul d be considered
significant." As a result, the Council will be required to adopt CEQA
findings and a Statement of Overriding Consideration if this conditional use
permit is approved.
The applicant has also submitted a parking plan which outlines the assumptions
used in providing 38 on-site parking spaces for athletes and staff, as well as
provi s ions for accommodat i ng spectators for major (more than 100 spectators)
and minor (less than 100 spectators) events. The plan states that in the case
of either major or minor events, spectators not able to be accommodated
on-site would be required to park at the main OTC site and be shuttled to
viewing areas at either the Boathouse site, a viewing point on the main
campus, or to the City of San Diego boat launch facility.
The parking plan further states that detailed parking and shuttle plans for
accommodating major events will be formalized by application for special
permits from the cities of San Diego and Chula Vista. The requirement for an
administrative conditional use permit from Chula Vista in this regard has been
included as a recommended condition of approval. A condition has also been
included which would require, in the case of minor special events for
personnel to be posted at the entrance to Boathouse Road to provide maps and
assistance in directing overflow spectators to the main OTC campus
parking/shuttle locations.
FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable.
WPC 0402p
/t(t3~J/
_____._______.___._._..._____ .__.____---"-~b"'1.-!.. L.!-/i'
---- -- ------ -------,;;.- --=._~._-==
I
T"--_J
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
"-;;'
I
I
,
,
r
I
I
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
-
,
:;J.
. ..
,
,
"
-
U2WER OlAY RESERYOIR
~----
1'0. , r I I I DI!I..
I I 1 .... . ~ 'I'I ''10
· llIi ~ '(~
~
I.~III~. nli , t I ~~I \;. J IliD.
. tttttttttJ, II
! , ~
/tj(j-~ ...... I
;;;;;;
..
=
-
-.
,
"
-
--
-
SIte Topograpl'ly
VIcInity Map and
)cf '3 -ft/
2-2
~~
!!II
--
---
.
Boathouse Plans
.
.
/Lj{J~7
.... 3
.
l..
0
to:)
l:l
-
Q
Z 0
<
Vl
l . ~ ~
" ~
l:l !- ~
" ;
!- ~~ -
~ :E -
~ ~
U ~11 UJ ~
UJe.. ~
to:) !:l ~.
<0 VlUJ -;
z I!'" ;:lVl ~ "
:: E
'''Il1v.;>J - '" O;:l ~
Z j::!E:
. 4? ~~ - ..::< ::I:..l e ~
< ~>- !-<
~~-~ =: "'5 <z <
j.;: \>, z '5 ~E B
CJ') ) ~ !- 00
c:> ...'1 f:t 2: ~< a:li= '"
,.l' "~ U '"
~~ <
~1?;l "c., - - <d
e.. g~ 0
Ol,/tfI'? ~ Z ~
>- 0
'"" u <
..:l S '"
0 ~ m
'" ~
E '"
j!:
~
Vl
Q
l:l
!-
Z
;:l
('
.
/it3~'6
jj
-
/f
'BWII I,
;~ .hi I I :. n,l -UJI,d .1
i~}\ ~~ 1 ., I 1<
.'.E!i1i ~ ot.v.# J !R~ i I ~ . lilt 11][L]
'-I i
I Io~ i ,.:. , I',
, .> I _"Il.
2
i
I . "'- .
. ..' .......-.,:... , "
~.,- -,
/ 'I ~ .."
. .~ . . t? ~?: :l'::~~:~
",r-, r"
-- ""vO"" 11
/' I ~ J fjL'i .
/."...:. . ; I'
/.'(' , ,..J, ~":I"Ul. ,f" '. '( 1.( ....
. 1 '-"-'~'-' ". ::;--.,.
. /'/[''''111 1=llc:J~ ..t ""-~ - --'0'"' ..~.
~ I -~ M . "A'.-='''''-'' .
.' "... 1-, '~f/:C'~ "::_.
/. ..-m'<., ". "I r"~~ . ......
.r-' 1/,;' ~~:"'= 1/6' . . .
- ,~\~. , = ~..--~ .
\r~~/ " ., ,.-.~.., . ,. .........<J... ',.. . 0 .~c.
&. . 'vJ;\ ' . . ' I . <;:y -
I "'?/';.. I' D LJ . '" .......
/, ''!>i/l ~ .., D ,-r -.--,......p.i..0!.
, ..:!E l.[f] l~FAi ~- 'u( ..'k;f;j:~~.>-<
...... . "[''''V]- L . ]1 ..t-/.. .
"1'l\ I \. -=. ..::-...---
. I .-_~ ; .,.".....,.,-.
I '- "---:~-/-
. -~
L,....----..
I
(
.
l
r
I B f !i t i J I I I II;
; . ~~ t~ h 8'. 2 2 I I I t
I : : !I !l :1 : :! !l !i !i ~! ~! ~ :
r
..
! ;J () ...-(
:r.
~
..'
t!!
\<1
.\,
\
\
i
!!
.
~.
,.......
-- . :::-.-==:::-
~-=-..a::.---==-_._-=-__ ...--_.:::::==.:::~r.--=- -.- --=._---- --
__-- _..':C '-'
=
-- .-_._---._... -
----,1'1'
L~!'j
..-1:-.1: I"I!
, - -'r
"
~
~)\
'~OL~ '*
.' ~ r-
IR! j
'-I
I I
I
d
.......... .
. .. -,
':;'.:'
. .'-
11
&>
i
L
;
II
I
I ~
e "!I!' /, I r:l.
~ i .:ll~
"'I I III' ' [U
I'''! J ii',
~. . I 'I I
!
r ., r: ..- "1
I~~I ~))
.---.,..;, ,../..
- '"; ~..,' . P-~~.0'
;1 . -[JJ' ...;
. .' .
I. < II!! . 1 ,....;
I ... l' 1-',
I I .
! lilt .'
1.ls .... Qf,I,
t, .lL:JlJULJ
. -- .
.
t.
. -~
i .
.
?
.
.
.
I
I
II ' ,
,-~ Idll<"
.- :l~i;_,;"
115!' ~
,,"1" '
:. '"'
i '"
f~\\
~II
CA~
]
C
o
~
~~~
~;I
~!I
m~1!
i~1
:t ~"
"
11 !
&I
/tjf)~/:J-
~
~ (
Iji- ~!II!------f~\~-_n~l~i
.,~I!I!,! i~JI !~ii
_"-lI I ~ oc.~ B I
; -.'II-nJ. II~'I
I.... ~I<
!! i m! nf,l,
lII!il, -MULJ
1
I I
::0 Ii, "
I , ~ ! ~
~ I I '
i I g II ! 'II
~ R I .s I ~
<t
-
r
,
\
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
---~
-~
",~
'",
.."'"
. "'"
---
..-
I
I
I I
.
.
,
,
,
,
\
\":/ a
" ~.
/ ~a
,
. ,
--.
..----..
,
,
I
,
I
I
I
I
I _
: I .
: ,--
,: ,::
" ~
, -
, .
. -u- ·
- .H. -
II _ .
~
- - -
--
--
---
--
---
--
...........
-,
'--
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
.
,
,
I
I
I
,
I
I
I
I
I
\
\
,
.
........
..-
_0___---- --_.-",:,:::,,___~=--::'.==,==-===---__---:~':-::
.--.------.----~-----~.- -
l.1u! I'B 'f ~ \ .IA i
. ~..li I! ~)I .,11,1
_ ...li 04.~ ,
.
.
i:r
~I
.-==-.:::....- -- -- --==--
II
. I · ~r;]1
Ii: 1 nl! i i I1!!J !
~i; I ml I i T,l !
liilQ \ . .. ..llLJ .
J I
\ . 1'1
H It! II -----
I Gill ~ ,..,..--.-.-. -......,
."s ,/.-- ---.........
I II // ./......------" ".',
~ :S< ./ /' " " ,
- ./,. " \'
. . ./ , ,
'I --,- \\\
, 1)1
/ / . I
/ / / '
I I /
/ It' ~
/ I I i!'
, I I
/ '~ --t t----- :&1
. -
r+ -
IIU ~ .1 ..
Krt I! ft I
.1 'CD
0> .:11
~ 0>
I' ,
.~J 1.11
-"
/ L(()-;1
A!!IJ
--:..--
---
----------
--- /ftj
_____ ,/V'
L
ED11'1 f~ \ lid
. .....,111' i~}.f l!i i
....111 ~ 0..'" R I
:rn;
. . . I
l. ,
1 Ull .' fti. i
~ I .0 1 I d< ;
B I IIIl ,
.... I I',
. . .. .. ,
I!
f
1
I
I
-',
[:--rr.IJ-nJ. -.. .
..._ - I
!
.
.
~
~I
~I
.
!~[)rIS
......
-----= II
__~_=__._-=-__ .. ---===--:=-..:-: -==-~-:,.o:=.. ________
~=lr ~ II~ I I I ~ · [i]WJ
~)\ .. I " ...;..
i \ n!. I I II~
_ .. .1, I !~~ j I m! [hJUJ
C~lIl ~ IlL'" .I I-I J I
I . ......
I I
'I
_._.--~~~~--
Ii
Ii
s
\J ,
,Ill,
.~
.~
iil
~.
~ 1r
----
-----
--- ; I
II! .1111 ~}\ 1111
.1J!1 Ii ~ ".v#" I ,
.
\,
"
I
I
i
...- .- .. -
I I
~
~
~
.._----. No
~ ',' ri'
i II!! I I J1<
~ I m! I i~1
5 r .t1..ULJ
i.
, I
,
ii
i
~, '
jtlfj-J7' ._~= J
--=~'='==_":.-__.-
-_._.-=-~- --- - ...- - -.-
-- ----===-:'------
===--=----_:- ---
'I
1.1
E~'l ~)\ II~ i ' · [i]~
..~. !lll! . . I " II " t'i~
.11" 11 doe:
-1I11!' III 1211 I lilt 1lJ[L)
.-.11 . ~JI I 5
_-~ ..' li I, I I ) . .... I ",
I , . ... .
-
~ IlB
ilB .~
~ ~
""," .,' ilB
i !
-
- -
II
'I
II
I
I
I
)LI!J~! 3
! I
II
I
a
, Ii;: . I
~, 1
", I
..'.....~...'. :
,," I
',' . I
,;. I
.: I
,. I
.' t, I
~; I;':" I
I
., I
I
I
I
I
':1." I
l;.'~' \. I
~"I. , I
. I
I
I e
I 5
: i
I.
_ . J
d
T
.
.
.
.=tl m GIA.. II 'I · [JJ~
. II' f -~ ~,I I Iii" I!II .' ::;.
!I I ~)! II~ ! g j' '; I I II::
..Ii Ii ~ OL'" I 1111 J In, "Ii .111 .ilLl
III' ~~.~ ,:=-.~!~~, "-~.~",..,, .\~~;i1'I'~MlilliZ=
:'- ".) ~ ''''''~S'', :?i ~ '~ s.--,L };m. " ,Ill , ,: I . '~. ',~~\"lI;;,~~tJ ~
, v~ ~-~~~'~ '"":'\~~ ~..:JflJ .~ ". '\1 l- rJ., W ~!l 'I \'~".':'~";.
'-~"Wl.i"fR-~~\.;;;-- ~~ "~:!"';' ~-7'~~"~' ',' :.,\\, ': ',p..r1'."',;,,~.. ,/t
zo-.::"l. Y",/.. ......-.,.~. '. .~.~. '" I', \' " _,i . ~ . ., ....P'.
- . l.', ...~ '\ ~::: '\ ,'. - . ..II. ,. ~.", \ . ,..r ..., I) I 'j' jO I'
;~~,,<..' I, .l~ 1\1/./ ~:-'..... ' _. '. I ~ ,I I "'~ ..' .', 11'1 J.:::'
_,~tj ", ""~~''-' ~'\;::--="'lli\:I- ,.' I II ~~,(~.I :j'(~L~='~~)'I'I\ J..il\<~:~'\"-
:",!l\'I~\,' ,~~~,I,I!J,l~\'., ,'., IJ .:..{~' 'p'\, ~_ .,11 (dl j'~ ~~
,;.i~:!i:"~{~'''';;1,)f\lfi''\~~ " "'l':'ftJ~/'I". \1\ ~.t "~". ..._~, ~' _~i' ~;"
" - :'_~~' --:~' 'f) -=)1 ~ .-:;.,( ~lr'.' ~Ie_:::""'..l.~ !,....
,1...'Hli"", - -'-./," 1/' , ' ,. 11111\ .~ --- -."., V !~' 'W'"
'r&":.{.~ ...:-~ _- //'. '{-''or, ri ,'\.."l\.~_I--",,:'J9}."1 ... /I'
Ii I.~ '~,'~'~'~;,; )~~:~:;:-T,'l~:; ~ji!itS;~ ;~,i:~Vlh~fl": I ~ .... ',~-W," ~," \\'.. ~I~.:::: ~,;~?J}(!~ ~I
" III , . <.:~' . ',-~.t . '.. J.'" -, ,', 1!. J. ,I ~'$f(llI 1 't'-..~" ..' ..'1 '"
II .<h.~)),,\,..\~~tt'.. =:'..9;;....::-'/r.. Ji, It'2\\!\ ~ ......... /..... .,
;!~', .~lll!I~',2.~,~);.!! ~~-_/rl~11y: ~ , )JI~~\ ;..,l!L, -.;:).....~ :',:~;;,",
. ",IJ,IC',~ , ,~.' ..' , " d. II, _....... "T " '-=='-\_11 -':','.:Ii. I
'-dlfi"17)0ii,;v'yr:;(/;~,.n: i7'. 1" : \!,., . /'mtr;;? -:';:i1 !.L'~
. ~I~.'Q~~~~}~~ ..' I .,r~'Jd'f~'~:.~jq<<~~~
:';, ,.' ~,t::?: ' ~~~ t,,' . ..' ~ . ,\\ 1"(: \ ~ - \~-' .~l~ I J: "11\
1"6[/ r7 3;~ "- "";/-\"1 ~' e ~~ \ ~ .' \'~,- //'~ /'. ,.,:'/ ~
~~H ,~,r~~~~ \.~:;;~"'--;l ~~'I\,1t fj# ~'-; ~"~ ; :-. ~9"~ ~ ~&~\s=:= ~:~"'-::::>~J
/ ":~ ~gil :~;)II\\I',' 1'1ll((( l,~~" - "t;; (.... '~:>_. "'~"\l~l~ ' / /' '. ~):
" "'~_=" Iii,' \ 1\':, I\,II'~\. ,/11' + .. . ,~:, I I ;/../........' ~ili I .:. , ,1//../"0. ,"
~, /_r" ")' ';1" I .. I =IL:',~. I ( fj (I\\[_~(!;,~'/ 'Y)
, ! ' , ~If I I ."~..,;.... '\.,~Jr-.-tJ~ll'- , 0:\"
". < ~' I \'~ ',d.' .. I '~\\1'6 ,.)-,// \fl, C.-;::v
:- ,J '- 'r' - _ ,\."\11 f .. I ~ "'-Q C- _ if), '"...."" I' >.
'::;'H~ .... .c'd! .?' ,.;;;,: .(,~F'" ._':'~5~- g;),~'\;,{,,~e.' \~/)~}It"( /.
~ "-, ", \<C '\ I'll .,:;t'J-ilJj')- )-...,;" ('j)f(~' ./0,;; \[J' ~~'
". ~m :"lJ>.}T .. I . ."J,.i..../'/')\ C.
2'~._ "~' - \ .'u." u . .. ....~;.JJ,~ '1"" j r ~ R. \'\-7 fr~)' /, ,- f
:::;_.~ ;"" \ ~~...\, ; _ _ .. i'\\,\ \ ..?L ~\.\ ~t:2' ".S ~\ \) l' ~:,f/ .' d:
:.; .~..........I / '\ .. .' '\L.~4 I -~.J! .-J---?~ ,1// , ~,
;-;- ..::::~::,~"- I~/ /' ~\ \.:1.( ;~) -:;:;~~~~:I~( 1-'5::.:~~:''',,,~;; -\):
- ~:;:~- ' 1/ ~' 5'l"if1' r;:::::.::.:. '\.."\"\ ~'''''''''''Ii'~'''' -:-(
/~ ..'= {::~'",:::':'c< ~'I, ';\\, (-J.:,', (:/ )..,:r."~\,~~,(,.\" G=: '0"'r0'~' ,: ~~<'~',i~
~......:.t~ ..... " l\.-l") '~1\~~ ";.rJ?J)<~
~'-' ,cor-. - - ,,;'- iU} \\ (. ,i,'E)-C '~~~ "0
. 1.._,:-:-::.. ',_ ;':,.~';;:AI 'I (i~ ,1]1 -H-1~S~,:':'", ~J\~ .-'1" ~~I~!j-:&:/!:,'
~' ~:~v~r_ \ \.. ~Grl'~J12'S"'.~:;):C:~~iY'Ci:(~4
~~,(0-4 J:.1.~ ! !!>/J 'l')j \\~ll~~~~!,f;:~}"~;::' ~j
h . "D ) \ 1m ,7 d~,l. \:.1-1 ,.....,:ltI!11 lii.9,Il~1 r-- ,Ulfr-/ I /~
._--=-~~,::,,,=,,.:="'",,,,::,-==--~-==-,:--=--::=---=--_,,:,-==-,,::.,:='.=-=-=======--.__::"'_-===--::-..= /5
.....
~~ll
"'.111'
.....llll
III :1 II!!. [UJI II ~ .1
I ml nf,l,
r . MULl
... .... ~~~~.: ~ - .- ,;" '~'. t\l~t~" .e "~~ 6.
i'"....S~=-~~~~~- :.... J' , ~~h)ll 'I' "
~.'[ , ' ' , :l". !l,1 "",,~-7 'f4'" I ,I i;~"
'>))~,r:,:,:" I ,,'~ '.', lil~~ 'If : ~, .' ~=~"ij ,;" -, , [!I' "-
-. .~~ ,., A.' fu! 1\ ). =-= l. \' (-J'h f I : .........
, ~ - ::-;;;;;;1 ~) ~" I" 'I , II/'/ - '" I " \ .
,~;f" :--- < ,(;.:_:: ~~):I}:t.Jll' ", : 'iJ ;I~ (I'" \~J{I::;; ,,:.~ ~ '! ,," l,)i\~
. ';'i. ':1!.','r.'- l\;:w ~f! 't . ~, ' · ,., , . '., '~\ ,:; , ., ,"'1 / ;I,~WJI
~'i~i"'1' '~':::7?0i'::; '~,. -1.1 , -- "- -~I ~', ~,'i"" i) ,;i;''':'
. ....:. _' "\ =~:~",,'4:1f. r,.j ~j IJ. I',' \\..: ........,." . ;': 't' i'l/. iJ2
t ..... ~ ~ 1~ ~ -~_~ *'~ " _ ::~} + \.\ t .. ~\ 'Au /. . I i ../i (l~~.::
, - ~ '\Il . 1 . ' II" _\ ,"",. - " i
~ ~\~\"~>>'~)l"':' ~~W:%",i/ ' ,! .,' 1\ ",':'~' -'Jd~..,l
~ I ," ~~..h 'W~, . '. ~ ;. 'i", '. .,... · , ", - I '
- ~~'" ,..w-~~ _ '/, 'i. 'I .~. -, ';'-. ~~, .
~'0-,' % :~~;i>l:V}f~,/. 'It]~ ill ',V\:I:' ,-~-'~; h."': l'rji:J~t~
"" '~., roz Ii) i j :::r ...", 'l~' ~,~
:- -- ~. ~ -- +. ~~1 ~;11 I 'II _'.'''', \ . 1 .h' \ ,~';;:~"~\\' \ '.
" " .': ~ : r... ..- II :1((' ... ' I ", -.:..... , . ,"-</r,:~:': ' // -'-t'\"\\'Y-j"i'
,....,~::: ~~ 'N.~<I'" .,' I' iI..\, To:.' . """"'.-'" , Y.....
".::.~~ 4~~~ ;jj Illl ~~~ .. ... - , " " \ . 1\;;' '.0 .,. --. 'I /' ./1,
~>i:~,r.;I.l,r?'.'.I::" ~:\' Nj'l~~,.~.: e-I",~:,\,~~,~'l f~':~~;' ~ ~:~\. fit .;~::; -t'?/jP'j
I))>'" (I ~\ ~ . ~. f.."",, -.:. ,~.-,:, "~.'I . hi,.. ~. ". ~.' ......
. y"~"" \'~" " ~ . " "r ,....." ~..,' :::0.--;0,; e' . / r.~"".
Z '~.' f~ ,:w'..;-,\\.\",:.;i ~\\>>l. ---! . Mi.." . -,.....,..;.: reA''''' 'f .
(~ft(~)lrj)( 'I d~0 I<~\\'/. . . ','.:,;/7 !;l}~~H!'\ " , ,i:tR/-;;~J!
Q. ~ "'j".I;" ','IIi I =-~ ~~'...f.!,\, (i/'~liL\''': \',~. ."" ".' '.' .',':'.'):'~,
',I) ~'< . c-"~d') I " "4,;.':;" ~.~~~L..j' n' ~., . ''.x~
.~ .) .,. 0:; '\'.. . j. I I J~ ~ (1':;'-, :,'r!{: ~l'j%)' ..>~ :'.
'~- )',\- ';- ~\\Zs '')f I ~:~~~G1 (..., ~:'t.'.;'[</ . d'~)I~li;
;J" C; "... I'~~/-/ ,': '",' {~;. ~"<'~.~-".~;,~J.\f:i,I:~.~~~'~.'~~WV4:.
,- .. I }' ; : _ !~ "c' 'Jq. ,.~.\.,{ Jli.gf!dt.y~ .\', '~l
;;.,...: .-,,-;;~ _ "i\ .......".:. I' 'I:'" ,;~~..\~.'~~~Q~~i... ,LI
I " , " . :/ . '\\ ........ ';V"~~,~ ~l{ ./'.1/ ,../. ~1\"(
~~.',~. .-: . \ I '~':" .~.~ 'l''.'&~''~'~'''''''iI'.'7''':''''=~>''''~ .V1(/~,~,~:(,
_. .... '-'"',..) \''\.\ ~... :\\l _. -"~., I. " ,'. .\:f..J~:',_I..;.',.-.:
~....; ~ ______',,' /.~... ,," '. .. ,',. ~ ~ ., ;:...r "J ~.)) ':!';\I7 '\' .
:; ,'"' .:.::::-~.;~ '~> (>..... ~~. . " ~ ~ I(,i ;: '>':ft;l ~([~I'~'Q , .1 ~~--;.'i.. ,::'""~: "'"\'~~ir~\
_ '. ~_"\,,;.t"" _J L I~~) o' . :".v~ ~)r~~&..:"' ~. ,,~ \\1'~ ~ '. ;." '. ,,:' :
~ _..- ~.- '," .".. 'I; ;\ I r~t')"J,-- ''\'" (~ -........\1 ",'~.. Jd~'
. -' -""' /",>:-,'~ / .., " :. " /1 ",hl' ~ll\\ 'i~ .', '/:.1{' '!~':'~
~=~~-:,,;I;/ ' . f" .",' ',,!, -i~ ~\\ ,l ~~;( ~ ~~~<:~~;;~:~~J.~~1
~~7~>,,~" y:~!..}.j,1 ':\ \~ \~\f t ,~i~~f~,(,,:.f-~~,i:)~~':"~;
. (_. ,--c:' : ..;., -~/F{\' I' I .' . ~., ,,,,~. 0<
~~_:-~.-' -~~.. 4W~!,_,(~~\~" ;: l -., ~ "f -~~'"i~~I~~gJ~~' ,~t ~
'.' ;'=-:---=:: .'Ji;<'..: ..)>{I:\~~~ ) '.'1 i'~L'/K Ii,' ::,,' ..:" ,~}{~~, .~~l!..~, ,-,'
~::,_ ::c,_ ~ ... .?(,))): ~ ~ I . .,~\,/:~'\i~;'.~~:;:!ffij;
~. " ",.~ "," ., ........ .". ," -: . d;4 "~" yr; , '~11! II'!~!' ,.=t~:: 'I~:. ,"0 ,~< j ,,:,,~..e;fi /
'~~~~'ti~=' '.~~ J./ ~ \'.'\''''I.r!tli~--''~ .~- .:;?".....l /~j.l\,'l .""'!
::'t'~~~\"JV~. ;...;;' - i'll I \\~I;;.~I'WI~I\"I~~~'I}")"'\:i\U..t \~I ;:'9iv~:
"--..-.-, ' ~"')....."., ",' "" '.~::::;, ,Jml'IF'~~~~' . , ~"" ,,',' /3"~'. ,~,i, 1
-.. "\ ", '. ,1 . ] . 6_:"""\7;" -.:'\\ .' ,Wil . j.~/'-;;;::O .1' ,-:-:: .'. ,-... IV, 'J. ;.0 -.,\\,\
, \ -.-.------------- ----=-.:.-: /
r.=:::::-.:::........==--=-......____-==-===-..=......---..-.------.--------.- ~ I <c
~}\
~ Cll~ '*
lid
.Ii i
I I
I
I
I
I
I
. .
.. . ~ :.-',
"," ,
.t.,
...i...._.,'.w~.. '0'.:
...~
~)\
~OlJI
".
[
(
I I
"
. ~~
;, .~~
;\~~.:
";.,,
'; .:~)i:~
, '.'.1.
t~i~'~F
~;":''lL:
.'~~;-~ : :;
";"'/l
" <',/
...
:r
,
.~::..~. .1> : .):":~i' ...._; ~ .' '.:-~
..; ;.,,!,:.~ '"
. .~
.~-':
~.:i', . ~'....',~':'~(..,
.
,."
....
I
j'
I
~~i~;:~~- _ - J 1!:-~ --
~.. ;
I"::,;.. ,~
'::. ,.,
. .
, ...."..
~ ~-< :"J~;'
~ ;;\:'. ~;::
i. ~;t';-.:: .....'" ",...,."", ... ..' _..
l:!' ~.. IP . '..,i'.~~~~~~....~\.~ -:.-: ',: ",
Ii, .,\~.,QI"'~'/J""'..r:.... ',' . ,
t-. .tJ~"''''''~;'I~.''''~' ,.,).....,; .~.t. ....
!t~;:;:...."'" ,.' ct,' . .~..r. t" '.,
f}- '~~~~'~.~t.'.!C:l"::?t";,Io 1".;;'"
f: re~6i!';~I;ihj,;:'" ::.,~: .; . I
.. ~t~.\..~.r.~~H.,,\,! '., II . ~. .
I.\t.:.-.....--~:j..: ~.., ~,:".. '....
..~.:.n;~..~...:~ ;,,:' _~:~. '.
~~.,.~,....., '",,!'. .:.....: ",
. :..:1I~~lfrI6~ .J,""'"7 .
:i~~..._'::~.~~ ';..:':'~' .'~'-
'r;''t",""J:i!Ji. ~}~ 1,-. .;.."
~:-::<.t~.,~~~:", l~"~':"':-~'j:
~t'..;;.i(V',''''',,~, ...... '.".
f, ~~i~ri'
.. V:;.,..'....._4J4/ ... .
~:~. ~~~/:?~. \~t~~.~.._~i..,.,; :.'~
",;. :':0: ~~:'~:' I '
~':: ....; I :.,:".,;;i . '_"::':
, ~F:1~;~i:'::i~'
~~.~:~~.~.:.:.~t~i: . ,"
!~..;"::.;/
>-:: ,...~
. ~~)~,
~e':"
~;;~;'.~;:.. .
r:5'~~~r
~~:" ," .;~..~\':'
.~ . ,r
..~
,~, "...
I
,
I
'1
"I
IIA I
I,ll
,
:rn;
'-"','
I
t
I
h
H
i
~
I
III
~ .
d
Ill::
.
I
~
,
II
Ii
~
I
nl!
1111
....
",...:.oti(.ti
..;t'. '.
>~!' ~
,...,:;.. I
II ::: '1
. !. J[L]l
1
I
;\
'1
.
.111:"
.
.
I
I
-'
1
J
:\
;
.\
I
:.\
.;
I
:1
I
I
1
';
I
.
.i
i
I
i
I
1
!
.,
j
I'
I
'i
I
,
.'
I
.-:-
---
.i
.. /7
d :J
-----==----
.E~!lll'
- EI:H .',WI
~
~)\
~ fA'" I
~.
-t
i
~-
.
.
) I I ·
:!!~ ;t g !!~~!I
t iitl!~lt!1 liflJi
; l!i
i & ~ I, I ~ A
~ i ~ !l !!!!! ! ~ !i !!!
II~ i
Ihj
I~ I
, ,
rn ~ .[UGij
I I ~ II " ~.
~ j II,; I 1 liE
I 1""" I " II~ ,. ml.I!, lilL!
I,
u I,
fin
I I
,
. 'l't ,I JII" . ltt". I I t'!I:t' . 'u lill
Il~it'l" J! l,.lPI 01: ,'tl!l. II It'l"~ ,II f ;'l~1
, g,tt ':.1 .~llII, 1"'1,1 i' I hI II J !l III' . lUll
liannti Iii iiHult IHmUdhi llil bmnllli m tlllh
.
...... . . . ..
. ~... . I . J'
C"\, ...Jr,., .t'
,'r~ -_~"I~(
1M~ "l\...'~
, I,.
/ "-.s;-
.'\ ~'\.h
'I' jJ...." ",-
t)I',~1''';'' '"',
(j...... .~...
..."'........;..:'..,..,.... ."......
t........
~ ~).'
\ ii.'.... >...t?f.
' 'TIju; ...,.~~~;,.:
n ./,,;Y, _~.".
, ".,f' ,,,1'.
, "~' .".
. d"(,~ .,.
~ .t
II
"1
'J i I
I 'I
~.
, !ii
111
11
. III
mt
1'1
dJ!
1ft.
hll
\."
Hi,
tih
!"J
Fig --.2:J
.-.
.--- ---- /?
:=:.-====-.::=."'::":':.=::_-~~----- ---:.-==~:=--.:-..:="=--_.. ~.'=-'.-=~_-:- -_.-:::":'_----=-~_..--:-:--.__.~---
.
Facilities Management Plan
.
~
.
/1-/ ~ ---23
...-r / 'r
.
.
UNITED STATES OLYMPIC BOATHOUSE
AT LOWER OTAY RESERVOIR
FACILITIES MANAGEMENT PLAN
JUNE 1992
.
ILff}~d-V
.-. ;20
.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF EXlnBITS
FOREWORD
Lower Otay ReservoirlUses
SECTION I. ORGANIZATION
Lower Otay Lake User's Council
USOC Boathouse Programs
USOC Athletes Program
Community Access
.
SECTION II. USE REGULATIONS AND RESTRICTIONS
Training and Rowing Competitions
Operating Hours
Water Use Restrictions
- Waterfowl Hunting Season
- Fishing Season
Quarterly Management Reports
Special Events
SECTION III. SITE MANAGEMENT
Building and Grounds Maintenance
Boat Fabrication
Motor Vehicle and Trailer Parking
Pump Station Maintenance
Overnight Use
Use of Area Surrounding the Boathouse
SECTION IV. Addendum
.
i
!Y!3~$
Page i
Page ii
Page 1
Page 3
Page S
Page 8
Page 10
~ rJ-{
.
.
.
LIST OF EXHIBITS
A. Boathouse Site Plan
B. Boathouse Elevations
C
D.
F.
F.
G.
H.
1.
J.
K
Organiz.ational Chart
Training Course
Course Mechanics
Competition Course
Fishing Season RowinglPaddling Schedule
Waterfowl Hunting Season RowinglPaddling Schedule
Prohibited Use AreafWaterfowl Hunting Season
Rowing/Paddling Area Unaffected by 150' Constraint
Leased Premises
ii
pI () .- J-t
...... o?.t.
. I I I II I ..,.
....110 I~)\ I i U I lie
III' !i 1m! I i'\
~I
~ I . II I .
!II ...,.;
I.
:. i I . .
II' I ~
(I
I II I I
/", . ---~ .
id .lIs III ,
. . -~
.
, I I
/' I I
. .
,
I I .~
, I
I
. I
I ,
,
" I I .."'-.... ~
. . I
~ I I
. I
, , " i
I
, , ,
..' . , . I
~ ' .' , '"
y .
I
,
I ..,
," I
.' /! ,
I ,.,
.
.' I I
./ I ",
~\ I I
. I I
. I I
./'" I .
.'
.
-..
1~
,
,
.
,
I
.
,
I
I
I
.
I
,
.
j
,
,
,
,
.....---....
~
."...........
I
..........~
"
"
"
,
.
.
.
i::../j
/ if
.
.
I /
.. /
, ,
. ,
, .
, ,
. .
, .
, .
, .
. ,
, .
: :
: I
J :
............--~", l "
..... ~, ,
.... , 1....---.. I
............
'. I
........ I
...... \
........... \.
.......... ......
"
.', '. .
. '. .
..
'.
'.
'.
'.
'.
",
--.
....................
-==r-.:z:."Ia';-
--
__4.
=-
jt-J(3:J7
~ do!
. ,.}\ I ; nil . i I ,,~..
I I
I(t f
~J' all I I '!!I! I II t.....
. II J I I
,
~
<.
v
~I
.
.
.
-~-
..I
1
II
~
I
!
I
!
!
-
- ---
/LJIJ -02 'i -.
~c2:t
.
.
FOREWORD
The United States Olympic Training Center Boathouse on Lower Otay
Reservoir is one of several training venues associated with the
United States Olympic Training Center San Diego, located in the City
of Chula Vista in San Diego County. The central goal of the Olympic
Training Center is the training of American athletes representing the
United States in international competition. The primary purpose of
the Olympic Training Center Boathouse is to facilitate the training of
rowers, canoeists and kayakers competing on an international level.
The facilities may also be made available, when not in use by United
States Olympic Committee (USOC) training programs, to collegiate and
community programs (both youth and masters) on an organized pre-
approved basis, subject to the discretion of the City of San Diego and
the USOC.
.
The purpose of this Facilities Management Plan is to outline the
expectations of daily site management at the Olympic Boathouse, and
to establish a cooperative framework for operating the facility to
ensure the continued safety of the water as a public resource and to
promote co-existence with other recreational uses on the Reservoir.
Lower Otay Reservoir/Uses
The Olympic Boathouse is located on land owned by and leased from
the City of San Diego, adjacent to the Lower Otay Reservoir (Exhibits
A & B, Site Plan & Elevation). The USOC recognizes that Lower Otay
Reservoir is first and foremost a resource for potable water for the
citizens of the City of San Diego. The USOC recognizes that this
purpose supersedes any recreational or training uses at the
Reservoir, and that providing safe drinking water to the citizens of
San Diego is and must be the rust priority of the San Diego City
Council and its Water Utilities Department.
.
The Reservoir also serves as a recreational resource for fishermen,
water fowl hunters, windsurfers, recreational rowers, paddlers and
passive Lakeside users. While recognizing the importance of the
Reservoir as "one of the finest natural warm water fisheries in the
City lakes system," the 1987 City Lakes Plan for Otay Reservoir
recommended that "opportunities should be expanded through the
developmen,t of an aquatic oriented recreation cent~r offering rental
1
Jtf!J~cJ.1
A!!!!!IW
621'
.
.
.
..
.
equipment and instruction related to sailing, rowing, canoeing,
kayaking, water safety and fishing." In addition to providing an
important training venue for United States athletes - should the
demands for recreational rowing and paddling be identified by the
City - the USOC is willing to cooperate to explore community uses at
this site which will help to meet the recommendations of the 1987
report, bringing opportunities for these quiet, "human-powered"
water sports to Lower Otay Reservoir.
The USOC recognizes existing recreational uses on Lower Otay
Reservoir and understands the need for proper management of its
facility and the need to foster a cooperative efforf to maintain joint
usage among all activities. It is acknowledged that a commitment to
cooperation will be required from all of the recreational users on
Lower Otay to encourage harmonious relationships among the users
of the Reservoir waters and surroundings.
2
;t/Ij --JO
c:?~
z.
.
SECTION I. ORGANIZATION
Lower Otay Reservoir is operated by the City of San Diego Water
Utilities Department. The City has legal authority over all operations
on the Reservoir.
The Olympic Training Center will be operated by the USOC. The
primary goal of the Olympic Training Center is to train American
athletes for international competition. Subject to the approval of the
City of San Diego and the USOC, the boathouse facilities may be made
available for collegiate training and community youth and masters
programs.
.
It is expected that a Boathouse Coordinator will coordinate activities
at the boathouse for the USOC. It will be the Boathouse Coordinator's
responsibility to oversee operations of the boathouse, including both
maintenance and program scheduling. This specialist will coordinate
training programs and activities for rowers and paddlers at all levels
and will interface between the USOC, the rowing and paddling
associations and any community organizations which may be
involved in instruction and/or training from the site.
Lower Otay Lake User's Council
"
At the discretion of the City of San Diego, a Lower Otay Lake User's
Council will be established to deal with the interactions between the
various user groups on the Reservoir. This advisory committee
would include a representative from each of the recreational use
groups (hunting, fishing, windsurfing, rowing and canoe/kayaking)
and a representative of the City Water Utilities Department. The
advisory committee will review all requests for special events, make
recommendations to the City Lakes Committee and Water Utilities
Department on scheduling and special conditions, and provide a
forum for potential conflict resolution between user groups on a
regularly scheduled basis.
USOC Boathouse Programs
.
An Organization Chart outlining the relationships for boathouse
scheduling and operations is shown on Exhibit C. The following
summarizes the primary activities of the USOC programs.
3
/Lj{J--J/
......, ~1
.
EXHIBIT C
USOC BOATHOUSE
ORGANIZATION CHART
.
S.D. City
Council
City
Deptartmen ts:
Water Utilitiesl City Lakes
Pror ertv Committee
.
USOC Lower Otay
Lake
User's Council
Boathouse
Coordinator
I I
USRA USCKT
POlutial
Community
Users
.
1'-1 dj -3d.,
1- 1 ~;,."
.
.
.
l)'SOC Athletes Pro~ram
The USOC athlete program will be run by the two National Governing
Bodies representing the spons of rowing and canoe/kayaking in the
United States: the United States Rowing Association (US Rowing) and
the United States CanoelKayak Team (USCKT). Athletes preparing for
international competition require year-round training, and are
expected to be on the Reservoir almost every day of the year.
Canoe/kayakers train in individual boats, rowers train in shells of
one, two, four or eight people (plus a coxswain in the eight and some
four shells). Primary training hours are early morning (5 - 10:30
am) and late afternoon (3-8 pm).
Community Access
The USOC has a general policy that provides for potential community
use of training facilities if and when they are not in full use by
USOC/National Governing Bodies programs. If the City of San Diego
expresses an interest, the USOC is willing to work with the City to
explore providing community use at the boathouse at the discretion
of both the City and the USOC. This may include limited collegiate
training and organized local youth and masters programs.
4
j'f()---]}
- ~ c2it
.
.
.
SECTION II. USE REGULATIONS AND RESTRICTIONS
Training and Rowing Competitions
The USOC will operate a training course to be located in the main
body of Lower Otay Reservoir (Exhibit D, Training Course).
International rowing competition requires a 2000-meter straight-
line course, and paddlers must have a minimum lOOO-meter Course
for training and competition.
The USOC course on Lower Otay is 2000-meters in length, beginning
approximately 600 feet north of the inlet structure and ending
westerly of North Point. The course, which will be shared by rowers
and paddlers. consists of a series of buoys in a double line, spaced
approximately 100 meters apart.
Exhibit E illustrates the mechanics of the course, which consists of a
series of cable lines which, when not in use, rest on the bottom of the
Reservoir. When the course is in place, the lines are brought to
approximately 6-10 feet below the surface by hooking a series of
buoys which float to the top and serve as markers for the course.
The training course will be in place all year, being dropped to the
bottom of the Reservoir when necessary, ie: due to special events
being held by other recreational users. When rowing or canoe/kayak
competitions are held at the Reservoir, up to six additional cables will
be raised and additional buoys will be attached, spaced
approximately 12 meters apart (Exhibit F, Competition Course).
Operating Hours
The USOC Boathouse will be available for operation 364 days/year.
Exhibits G & H provide seasonal charts of projected hours of use and
anticipated boat activity (number of boats expected to be on the
water) for USOC programs. *
*Note: These numbers are estimates only and may vary depending
on types of boats being used for training (shells " singles, pairs, fours,
eights - and/or canoes/kayaks).
5 l'-/iJ'- 3 Y
.
I
I
li~ I
dl
I
.
.
-,:r:- -
I I
!
a
I
--
;L/{J ~3S
t un i I II~' !
~ I ml I ; r,J, ~..
I , .....ULJ
,
.
IJI
.
II
i
_..:t...
~~r
.
.
.
'" ~ .~, ~:....' .. ~.... ':... '. :
'.. "':1>
; ....,'Jo
,-' .
I III ,
." c
'. m
'-
::t
><
W
',,,.' "
". .
.'
I
, ./
.
:.
"
I
;., ..
1
~
\.
l'~
f'
~
i'
..
l'
r
,
..
j
" ..) I
'.'" ---iJ'
.... ,'. ~i'
(p...,''''......
J :;;.
t
.3J...
v;
- I
.
,
.j
'j
~
.,
. ~ .... , . . .' . . . "
..i;.:...:...~.:.w. .Ct., . ..~~.k~"i~~i-..~.~
J'-/(J~36
.
.
.
.,ce'" __.:~"'";'::J,Il..'
1 . ,.;.:-":-.:;.:: .-' ';..;.~~~~;"';' --;C~.<~
...,.....r...~lrl.....t'l.:' .~,\.. ~~;" ...~
',.. o. ......._... ','''N,
: : '.', .":-\;. ~ I'I"!I'~ :.::1\....::....\..., W
i .;1 . j\'r I.~,,: ~
II f !~!I !I.' I " ~ II)
. ;\1~
'. '.
.'
..'
.. :,-..
.. ,
.'
...
.. ..,.
.' .;' ....... .
,""trWt"'" ':f"",,"It:I~"~~ ;',,:,:;".:,1 ~..,. ", .... ,;;,!' .,..~~ :""'\"'*",~CH~~'.""'r.'.,"":'''''':, II,. "';".,.
:~~ii;\\'lr{~jFjili'l ~",:,~:t';; .'.,
'il!r~v' .
.}.1 :';''''0 .:!'..!'J.... ....:.., ~". .'. ~
I~~j.~i:St'::; .\~;~~ ~\::. ", .". .
." "."....,.... ...~ ..,.
:',\~, ~.".~~.~..\f" 'l..... t-
. , ,.~~...,..;1:....,...II...;.'..'..1 ..,... ..... of' ".. .- ~. :, .~ ~I"''''i~
.. ....I.'~.I".;v.~... :~~:..:l\l .-.i....\.I:..... I. ~ .' .' --, "'.:-r..;,
"\\""~' t' ;.l....'.,.,.j\".. ~ ...... ~'~" '.' '.. .'.'..:.",\:-:
~ ';'1..1 ~1o:'~'I~~:n'..,.~.~!;.'" .....!........ .<l~. .... '. ..~'. ........: (::;.
~ ~~!: -:il'iIJ~~~.~r.(~t'~~r:,..~'.j~~. ~ 'I ),,,:' :: ,..::.~. :;'" . .i.': . {\."..- ,;toI.,;.,)t
J'IC:('., ;!'~:(':\f.':',,,;"'..e\' '1..,:. ...1'1.... ....... .... .' .." :., ..... ;.j,.
,,~,',I("",j';<l:'..'nll!"....... , '" ......,'.;. ..... ...,......,
'.lJ';~I"rJ,('J'.Tt:'!'''i';...Vrrl\:1:',,, ~.", . ,..., .': .:' ..r:'" ":0.
~'''t!.J .'.,.11...'..."".... ... ,..
~ .(' :"1",~\ol.,"'.&~'i1" .' ',II . ,'. .. ... .....
. . '~I.~ .. ..... 'f1 'Ii" '.:.~;".' .':' :. . . .. '. . ....,
:s :"h~~~\'~~\:::"rr~":""~""": '. .'!:. t... 'J" .' ......
rpg.-;;J!j,'j~:)~!~t:~/';"lir;','",>:,:".' .:.'j' .,.,.:., .:.- ':<.:, .:~:.
~1I.' ~?..~4fo"."I,U!." .JtI'....:..,'... ...:. . . .... .~
\,~t I ....... ,J"lt.......~,~ 1" of.. . .' "" . .....- ..r,.
. " ,,'~;'':l ''''''';!f''J.:.~~~.~...i:~'''';:'~ .' ..... . '. !:.'
1~,._,.....t.>I' """".......'~I'I..I.. '.t... .... '. ..
. ~;1.t'.:)\':!"'r.t~~:...~~~;; .~. ..;.~.:.. t... '":"" .'." ,., .
. .,. !....:. '. . :'.' :"'. .: ('. ." ~.' . . '. . .. .,' :
. .~ i~ r;;"\~ ~IY~W.~' ~}.....,.. ":.,,.. I.' .. .
. :J.'I,;......I\'..""" ~~hltl:..~.:. ..~:. ,':~ .~. .,.: ." '.
:s "oI,,';a.~' r""'" ...1.,.11- ../4." '.~ \ .
If~ I'> '..:t:-~\ "'.~~ J, .l'....... . '.., ...... .. .,
~.~I::r:~~,:,;rlr.i:.tll"';:~:"':::A"~,:",,,. II ~:..
C;..:J~.I!'~I''''',:;;'~'';'''''.t:...,.......,..., ~\ . .
t rr-t-'''''''' I.... ...'t..... .\:;! ..;.-:; 'I ""
. ~ ::'{ .t, " '.:!. '_..... . '. . ...,' I.
oJ ..l....;,...."jl...,. .....\ ,'. ....,. II
~'i~'.1:...~.'''~. '..,........~'.IA..~.).,.'. .r'I'.'
. ~,,~.,,~ .. .. I .~, '. . . ","
riP,J,J" :.,..~'.... " .' ~.. ...... ~ .,. ",' '. ":., ".1
.! ~~~~~)~:.;:~~:~.;.::.~:~t.::.~ ;.,,'.',:..~. 'R:' ~';;':'\(i
t, '.Ir;.'.' ...If..!',:.......'l.r.,.'''. ,.;... .' "t;f' ,
. t;,;.,,;,.;..;:,"~.;:,;.'; ....... .":, . .,,.' .. '.~.I' It, I
t- ~,..".'.....",.,...,.,.;...... r ''';''.. ..
:;' .fr:'2~:.~I'~.;!:.::~;..~x '''..'. " .:. - '\;Jo.'/.
'~ R'\;,~""" , . ~,' ';.,;:., : ". ,
t. _~.;...t';'..~::~i'::.,~:,. .:. . ":~ :'t:
I.;. fli~:';.".<~").,::..~ '..::.' ... I ;;; 1:,'
i...~;l:;,..,.,I..:'.'. '.' I""
~ :t;i~~~~:~.lL '~:~:r':~' '. . .'.
f..:.t-~,'.'.l(.~ .",.......... .....
if ',{f:; ~~~f:.':;:.;I:;";: . ,'....
, ilr.-'''.'.:T' ',' "','" . ,'.
~ ti~~~.:l!..;.,..:.:.,,~. .
~ i"<"",,"""I',d~.".. I} ....
f; ~';~.'~~Jt.~f}}."':~:, .:~ to .:
~ I'"t In.";,,.:!..... '''", . .
, ~.rl:~;l.:..T;.":.;~.........,:...~'.
\: ~,',;"~.."':~::,,.!.: :~":'" " ."
~ t:..~......[ ~1..t ...., lO.' . .'
.. r~~..:. ;,'f"" ..t.' ..:.~r..;. ..... .
I: !t",,:, 1 -:":"-;,'1" ".. I..
. ~ I[!.);~"~:':~}:::S, ~:!;:(;'~':,
~:. ~.,.....,:._j,'..f;.(-~..~...;...~.....
i -,..... "
~~.:':~;;:,:;....?;., .
U .' r I)I'.~. . '.
J.: :I'A:.~ ~~~'j"!:": .
~_ I....t-. I"". .
ri: '''; \. ~ \'. ..' .l"': ..~ -.' .
';'!i\(:.>:'-:." .'
~ :r~~~;~..:;:; :;/~~:" ..':.'
r~ ',. f . .. .1
..~\il':J."'" . ,,'" .
I. , .....~.. . ~ ".. t....,
)\~~. . "-'.' ....' .
,........I'I~'_...-
. .r; I'~':':;';I"'''';~~~).:'~~:''..I; ~,.' ':.' '.~.' ,\..
.'
I>'~ ~ I
.,' .,,,
r"","
..1'..;....
..:~...~~~..
.,......
':J:. ..
.
..-....'i
,,;.,
., ,..f... ~
,
.-
.'
.,
".
I
':j
I,' ~
'.
.. .'
.. .,'
'-...
,,'
,.'
J
.~. .
. ~. ..
!~
,
~_...". ~
_Atr.,.~___.
-
.,..:. .~~t..~"'..;.ji!".~ . :.. ..........~.
..,........
AO'
......
) t.f!J ---Y?
"
,,',i '!
.,'
....
.' .'
.. 4';
: . . ~:.
J
!
I
I
1
'. ,1
:
II.
Ii
'1
I
,..
.'
.'
;.'.
.J
I
I
..1
i
- 1
I
.
J
"
I
.
"
I
.
I
.j
-~.. ..
"."J
.....
,.........
~.2J
.
.
.
--' ;::;
....:- ,::.~
f'" .......... .. .
;,I].~'~.''].I m~~)~I.III-1 . I ~ !.~ I : UU- i I II~' ~
ice/IU ~JI' I I I I;" d., 11I1.'11 II ~
i - i W
. .. JI'~b .:-- '.~; ,/. . ..', ) :\~51'~k J~
i,~iillr~.~ .....~~. .-: _~. :''1.;, ::tri.'~,\ "~"~~..~'~!!"I.' p.~" " ,~i)),;,t, .
r.'<o/.,w..~ Jl ' ( " ,})W;; ~" . ~; . I \. I' J'I~D
I~~.~ " '1'~l~~r.'~"~ J I . -:f' '~ "~I r' ~ I r ~I' .
'"'~J~'}:Z:lf~ i:~i"l'.J)"'" n . .' 'Y.1~D'~' 'if;.. ~. ';'~~=ililil1)>> :1 /'. . ,
rlAi ~ ii 'I.JDf.\ '!.:: h ~, :! . ,~ ;;"i" ~~,. \'\ '/i) '. '. ...,. . If ., . IJ"$
. i~ ''.iR.~ ,,77/. !7V~I~'i" r. VJ," . - .~. If~~~J l41~;-~~"".:' .~. J.~ll" ".:1\
cA ' '. , - ~/ ,I .' .,r, :, ~\I Hi '])
~;\ "",.v - I + I \\ -.'. f, ! ...YJi,~''f'; I
'~~P\'~~)'i' - . 11l11'f r~\\\~. _..r: 7.!:j"
, \. "\;\lW;~I'I:::lllll~. II ...., ~:rrr/ ,I ,( ;, r" : ". . .Y:' ,\~ 1
~!/I ! ~li.'.\I~ 'j W . , II. ,~,!l ~~\ ~l " .' _ '.'-; II ,
~ 'II. " ," 1:\ \~l.\.~, ",," ':., I
.~ dJ: ." = ".,' ~flj,"\I~ ,.,~~_.- "
- .'....A.~". .. Y I' "' ~_ v;' . ,i'~'I' i
'i ~~' ~/ .. - +' "1)' ifr:t:ij Y' ~
. ......"'" -- / II ''''C " \\1
JI',!".1'- . I~.. -- \ ..t " ~". ~\ ,'\
" "" ,,- - .. ,! ........;\ ril" fi\ '"
~_/.:<"~~~O~'~ ,de...... _~ '~~. ' ,\\ ~~~ '. 1:-':"', ~ ~.]I /7:ij1 .
'~1; ~~\ ~ ~ "," '.J ~~. Ii. :" h,;:f~'
":i~ ~.,'~.t-" 'r' ...~~~= .\' .' - '[~"
I '.~, ~. .'\~ _ ,:.. ~.~.~) . {\,"IJ '
"i;I..;Ql IJ .1):.. 'l~. ",' ,~~\.= .1.(:;;' i
.?i~' 1 . .. .".,."""" i\.,11~ '-"'.,:\ I' v;, v ~.
I ~ Co } tf!I; ;;l K li:~~~:l' 'ij]' . 'l\~
.~ ~~/~'II!J,{',/ I '~Ult<<~i" ~l"5~ 'JI!A~~"'~J
~)_ ~~ 1"\<('\ :.:.1...../,) , -... J~ t.~:~'~:',1 \ ~./ /1\\
?- ( I-I '( ~~, '. .i:~ 41 I. l~~~~l~ ~'. (~}" . 7i~ ':'.1~
;J. l.(:r,: ;"1;" I .....0.., ,"",,, '.' . . ).. ~
, ~ .~-t ; ,'~\ TA'~~'i:.m~~{J,; -. ':'ell;. ~;,\<<.~'~.
---' .: I., :>:" WI .,," ~ ..r\':~ '\. ,- Vy"" ,:r.. .~ .
'-~"""""', . :2'.; '. i tl .M......... , 'lu'; .~/ . r.'2.'~~\:- )'& ',~ "",V..I/ '1
r'_ r.." d, ", """-"" ... "r.) 'I
. --, .UIII ! ').: '. ': :'" '":- ,) ~,'::,..' "/Jt".f' (,'(t, ''L. \ l~
,~~~'~'~"'5~ .,I~' 'I~! \. .~&~~,~-;-o~:.:.;..~~!!tf~tl~'~~
:==:' :...~':' . ;1,:1 /:~...... ' ,~)~." 'I~';,J.J \ 1) -'~~A. ~
~~"'" .~.' ;,"., ) ;,."~f I....l.... ~:)~ (~ r.!"
::;:~.~~ ", ~~; {A~'" I. -'''':'~!!, ~~ .;(!. :;~ "i,"~~;~BtLJ':M!'"
. ~ ". ..-'~ ,.'/-.0 /".' , I '. .. rI~~I'" .r:', :',......"'" : ';J' ~'l.\l' ~' v~ " I " .
. . .. '. .,., ,'''~ ';-'" ~. .
i -:....--: _. . ~~'llif~1 t,dl(' ~" ',.: . ~ '" o;.;;:.r,;~ .' - ,.... ..
~ . .... i' . \ I { ,Y '.' ~
I
~--.. .............. I.J """'1'\ " \.... , I \l~.~ 7.
-' '. _ . ". "." ~. " . ~.. r. i<e . .,.... .. I. . .. ~ .
- '. _ 'I,. .... . '01.. ..J' I V . \ ~ \! ~ ~'=, .....,t! JIj.. .
~:--::-.::- ~.:-~ f ' ~ _ : ~~/<
.. ..'~~'-:.~~~;ful"'~'i~ .' rl/~ ":'":.~~~'~- ~~~--~~(,;;.
I \. -~"",..,.' _L~';":'.' .u~ .~.' ',I ",. ., "1
~ .O(:~~ ~,~::~~ Oil ..;\'; {\\~h~~ " · ,ft',~ ~~ )IW-j
i . ~~~t~Y~>~;'\\il\.lv.J.~~1 :!~ _'IIi n '~~I~~":." '.
~L4 ::-" .::".'". .... /'(15 c;;'... '--'-';': _~;~.J
r
'.
i
2tf.
EXHIBIT G
.
(Mid-January through Mid-October)
.
unN Wl'n J:'V T !;AT ~TTN
SIm
61m
71m IS IS IS IS IS IS 1 S
81m
.
91m
Tn om
111m
12 pm .
1 pm
2 pm
3 pm
4pm 2S 2S 2S 2S 2S 2S 2S
S pm
6 pm
7 pm
30 30 30 30 30 30 30
8pm .
9 pm
These numbers are estimates only and
used for training.
may vary depending
F-/6<J1
on types of boats being
.
~ 3.5"
:
.
EXHIBIT H
~RFOWL UUNJ'ING SEASON - ROWINGIPADQJ.ING SCHFntrr F.
(Mid-October through Mid-January)
.
J.AnN Wl'O IOV' CAT CH1>J
5 am . .. ... . . . '.' , , ,
, , '
" . . . ,
.... " . ,
, , ,
, ..- .. -', . ,
.; .." '. , , ' , ,
6 am , .. ,... " . , ..
" .. ,.. .... ,
\ . " '
, ,'. . .
" . ....
, . . .
, . . . .
, . , , . ....
7 am . .. . . . .
. . . . . . .
.. ,,".. , , ." ill.... "..
15 15 . . . . 15 15
, " ,,'.. ." 15
. .. .'H .. ,,- .. ",'
8 , . .
am ,.. . .. ...' .. '. ..
. , . .
. "
. " , , '. .' , ,
. ,
. . . .. .. .
... , .
. .' . " . . .' .
9 am , , , , , " .
'.. . ' " , ' '.
. , .' .
': '. , . : .
. .... 0' . . . .
.. . , . . 0
,n ._ .. . . ..... . . 0 . .
, .. , " , , 0 0
11 am
12 pm
J pm
2 pm
3 pm
4pm 25 25 25 25 25 25 25
5 pm
6 pm
7pm 30 30 30 30 30 30 30
R nm
These numbers are estimates only and may vary depending on types of boats being
used for training.
RowinglPaddling prohibited during hunting hours.
;ie ~tio
~
J "I'
JI,i'
.
.
.
.
Water Use Restrictions
Special restrictions will limit rowing and paddling activities during
hunting and fishing seasons.
Waterfowl Huntini Season
During the months of the waterfowl hunting season (approximately
mid-October through mid-January) rowing and paddling will be
prohibited during the hunting hours of dawn to noon on the two days
per week that hunting is allowed at Lower Otay Reservoir
(Wednesday and Saturday). In addition, during this season - in
order to provide continuous resting area for waterfowl . shells,
canoes and kayaks will be restricted from activity in the Harvey Arm
of the Reservoir (Exhibit I, Prohibited Use Area/Waterfowl Hunting
Season).
fishin ~ Season
During the fishing season on Lower Otay Reservoir (approximately
mid-January through mid-October), shells, canoes and kayaks will be
required to restrict activities on the three days per week when
fishing is allowed (Wednesday, Saturday, and Sunday) to remain a
minimum distance of at least 150 feet from the Reservoir shoreline,
except directly around the training course, as shown on Exhibit J.
Quarterly Management Reports
The USOC will be responsible for recording daily use of the boathouse
facility, including the number of boats launched from the facility.
The USOC will work with the City of San Diego Water Utilities
Department to develop the format and information to be included in
quarterly reports, which will be provided to the Department for their
use in planning and evaluation of recreational and training uses on
Lower Otay Reservoir.
6 1'-/(3-1(
31
--
.
.
.
'0- ....
-
c
g
III
CIl
lllen
l!! Cl
<.E
-
CIl C
III ::J
~:J:
""i
.! 0
st
.c2
o III
lr.~
~
.
t:
CO
:E
X
w
. "
J'1fJ~Yd.-.
"
....- --
...
--- ....-- ---~ --..... ---- ............."
. ,
"':* ~
"
......- .
....__ _.i i
___ _--..i
.
.
.
'15 ~:;;'(:'ll!il" f~)\' ,'~i f~' , , II: i !I!!ll]-al~':f:
Celiil ~ ~l liij " I I ii, !!!!.~[h]!
.. ~....~,. :~ ,_ "lll(m'\~~~)I;~~,c w
, .. - .' j" :>',\:B ) ~ J~~i:~
',~:~ (~~) '... '. . r~ .' ' : w' ,~Ji);'~l'
"', ~ " . .,,~,) J). : ~ ". J. ......,>.: '!r~'1 ,.'. :. ~ 1 '~J, ,,:: 'ii.:! '
""":)i';~ ".', ' ~~'.: i 't',,' i.;..... ,.'.._~. w ,I:', \ \~-i~~) -l i. I,,'!
" , -:.,<, ," " ~!""' ~~' ";'-'~)Jl~ Ji1 J{':(
f~,.;\_/,r,~~,.:.:;, _ ' ,~":;: ,,::~ k'\' . " \\,".. . ", ivP;:~ri :;' ,:/J. 'Ii J " .I
.,..:,,~'~~> ~i-. 0,.,,,, ,'1~'" ~J.j '.. l' ..:\\~~ \ '.,.> :a~,'VI:_~~. .... '/, 'J:; I ,'.
.~;\:~~.~~.! :c ..~~ "~.!"j'" N:\:.' .., '\nV" "'~'~;'~11;"'m!
fII;~'j" '\~\f,,',"~ ~~1',.' ~.. I. if/ ,~., J~,lJr('il,.\ ..'::S;7~.Y'i~
"~\\i!\r~ )', ~.', e;'~~t8 flit ~~ l;\'JZ1~~\~\~~~::: . ~:~,<,i'.Jj~
dj ;'I~~~;.~~ 'I!~' ~~, t~'/T, ',\::r:i~'ff'?ll;P~
. ~~_~.., ,,'"'' 'fr)w'tr',"~f~1,\'W~(~~'~
~ "'" - ...;~;;; ~,,.... :;:..~ ~ ' ,~11:i:.:,' I"\:~""\ \ ~t:~:;'~;'!l ~~-~..\\\ ':~~
N " ;2;.1/77 ' ,~ :I'~ F: itlNt'l' ,\,!ll.r.Mr1l . I .ti'l I II :1
I."~: '. '0,., rc...,..,..,.....~., \\-,' liI'f'!;I"'}'(\' ,,"f"" '="-'" ~I"iil,.al"
,~ ~,,,~ '~ I) ,.,::_:~~ "~....,... .. .--' ..~ '\. '\ .... . ~ . __, _L:t .Ll)j
~~'~~~"\~I~-'iJ ~I \:0" ~~,~/\~\.P' ~:::?~~
)))1\":~,~~:, ~'f~ ~ '~i~ I,h'/:"',;:' ~~. . .:",;,~ ~~~ ~"'~~
'fti- v~". .... ,- \:\~\\ )';!:::,,:, \ .~ t., '.. -...__i, "b.':c:;:'\\:ji~ v::::::::: l.
~~\\f (J ~ (~I.i;~\!.;~ 1~'~\I\ (1-- : /1 ~!t1ji~~~: [\[,~~ ' .', I~f~
~ ,.{'~"~' .l }.',,/; I",":~",,:-- ..: ":,' ft/f,'.-0.'f.1JT-\ r~:9'/' ~~\,
. !' JI:\1 ", ,,'.. x... -~"k< I/(f, ....~\
~ .i~ ~ { ~,'.'.'. '~...-'./l'if' I ,;:, "1/:"\\."..lu ~,": \.:t(I/~-:---'t2'; ;. ~;'>;v
; 1- r: ~ <:' ~:", ~ '\..l\..l-'4 (.., ~',:V':Ji . i)l.;;~
I.,. __~', , -. 6 ' " ", _. I _" I"J. .
~.. ','" r:~//,/ ~t~;. II;';;F,.., ''''''''''~-~(';:::0, ,;:p,~~~,~'!Y'LJ
V. ~ \- " ))' / .':.~~' . .>kL> . . ;',::1!i ',~'C? .\'(~~' ~
'. ' \ .. ,":'1;0 .<,.A '. \,.,\1 "'-I::~'. .:;..r-".. 'N ' '
.- ,.~.i! '.- I.'.......... ",:--'1\' 11""' ,:----,,-:\\';<.~l\i:':'"b7..:...~,((. ~~i>.:_.I ,
,~. " ~:\ ", " Jr.... \ ....... ,. . :..' r:, ,,'
r:.....-- ',!;, '. i ...........'., ..,
~.0 '~", ~ .,.' ,':'. '\~I I',~ ..:_:.c..'~''''.~ Ol''''h;~')"~ . ~ir. \r., ,}:
~"'~I'\. .".) ,-", ~.~ '~';"-.-..;x.\~! ,.''\tj\,F',' ;V\~\;
~.." -0.""""",. --1:.,:,........'ffI ) /-:: '. \\-,' '..' .::c. :<'\ ~:':,::>:'.ill/~,'" ':.', .J'L:~"J",
"-'"-'"'---'''-;:~ '-;". .' ~\.\.'I. .....s~ -,.," 'Ir':~ ,. "-, '
. ...: -.~_~~:, jrr~~ \~~'. ~.f.-;:;:;:i:~ )1J\~\\\~~t~ j<.~~_V:~(
,r.---" ~~.-:./:- 4 !J i)'\' :, _ "... ,~~~ . ;~~-~';~~lf~ '~'~~:~.~."~;:~' ~.~~~;::: ..~~' I :
_. =--~;:... -./ i." I"'.. ~ '~I':::':"'''':::: . ' .~ ~~...,.. ,."~," J
._"-- '"'- ..u '11 _ '.ro, .. . ,., fri;W.'>?. .c, .. ::i,,"' "....", c' I
;;:'~-";:::::' -. /1/1'/ .-i " \:(:v,-;~... '1'- \,':\t~~~'.. !f;:".D''.k1-;.:~ ,;:~.
::::..... -. r/lll .... i~.. _11li' \" ~,( .' I~-. :~iL...;:' ,'\j ,y~.
.~- l.. ~'-;' 'M1" " .~;"'.' ',.. . __~~~
~t-.~ :::;;~~' ~. ~'(:r..~~ ~.. ::,~\~~~~~\III" . '~:~."..~~.,~ ~~< .:~~C~.
" 'j - ).. ", ~ lr /1' I" ~ ". \~
. '.-~"=~~..~r.i:"~)~"\'A;!It"(-,,I" i-':,,~\((;f~~:,-:~. ~
J ~ - ::;":,..:-~~,~ 1/, "1 . 1~~\l~~"'f\~iftfr~.
'. .'. ~~~ ~f;::~~~J\'rjl :Wi\ I,J;t.~rklijwsJrI1~.
. -'1II:l:.":=--- _ - --
, ~,~..:.~~"'!\:-..~"'~ ..~~.'
JLI.(] ~ 1/3
~'I'I
.41
.
.
.
Special Events
Any USOC approved competition to be held on Lower Otay will be
considered a "special event". Most events will involve limited
participation, such as time-trials for a regional team, and will not
draw spectators. Other, more infrequent competition (an estimated
two to six events annually), will involve visiting teams form other
regions of the United States or from other Countries. These
competitions, which could potentially draw from 50-200 spectators,
may require restrictive use of a portion of the Reservoir or, more
infrequently, exclusive use of Lower Otay. World class compe.titions,
which will require exclusive use of the Reservoir and may be
expected to involve more spectators (up to 2000), necessitating
special shuttle/parking arrangements, are likely to occur on Lower
Otay only once every several years.
Any special event which will require restrictive use of all or a
portion of Lower Otay Reservoir will require approval from the City
of San Diego Water Utilities Department. Requests for special events
will be made through the Department and the Lower Otay Lake
User's Council, and will include information on the event date and
time(s), estimated number of boats to be involved in the competition
and an estimate of the number of spectators, if any, expected to
attend. The city will indicate, in approving any special event,
conditions under which the event may be held, including
requirements for event notices, course marshalls, special event
signage and potential compensation for lost revenue if applicable.
7
! t/IJ /~i
~4()
,
.
SECTION III. SITE MANAGEMENT
The USOC will be responsible for maintenance of the boathouse and
leased premises. The following provide general site management
and maintenance guidelines.
Building and Grounds Maintenance
The Olympic Training Center Boathouse and surrounding landscaped
area, as shown on Exhibit K, Leased Premises, will be maintained in
good condition by the USOC. The USOC will keep the facilities in safe
and clean condition, free of litter and safety bazards on a daily basis,
and undertake all necessary repairs and regular maintenance
responsibilities associated with the building and site. All
maintenance activities, including the use of cleansers, fuels, irrigation
equipment and supplies, pesticides and fertilizers will comply with
all State Hazardous Materials (Hazmat) regulations.
. Boat Fabrication
No new boat fabrication will occur on-site. Repairs to existing boats
and equipment are permitted. All cleaning and repair activity must
take place within the area of the boathouse building and deck wbicb
drain into tbe soakaway.
Motor Vehicle and Trailer Parking
Tbe Olympic Training Center will maintain a mInimum of 38 parking
spaces in tbe area designated as "parking" on Exbibit A, Site Plan.
Parking will be limited to the designated parking area.
.
.
Pump Station Maintenance
The USOC will enter into an agreement with the City of Cbula Vista
for tbe maintenance of tbe pump station located at the boatbouse.
The pump station will be designed witb adequate redundancy and
emergency storage, pursuant to requirements of the City of San
Diego.
.
8
It/(J - 15'
.& ....
u__~ (
,
.
Overnight Use
There will be no overnight accommodations provided within the
boathouse facility or grounds.
Use of Area Surroundinll the Boathouse
Nothing in this pian shall impair the right of members of the general
public to use any area surrounding the boathouse, other than the
leased premises (shown on Exhibit K) for recreational or other
purposes as permitted by the City of San Diego.
.
..
.
9 IYtJ-'1/?
, ~i
, ','i
~ .t
. 'Ii
'n.. . rl h:
&.,,;!;,
, "
I. ':. 11'
-. ,
~i .
-.-...------
I !
S"6 !
.=; I
o~o .
,I' ,
S~~ .
to ,
I i
; I
!J> ll3U;,i,)
~ ~'\%
III ... 7.-
~~,:- Ii
'It, 0I.v"'~
11
~~
Q
~
11
.:.
-~
i
l
i! .
""
i:~
;i1il
!'l!f
iil11
~,.. '~,
~." ~ "~,,,.
;~ ~ ~_.
//
...
r1
l
!
. (;
\
~
J
1
\
I
I~itffi+- ~;
r- I 1;
., oft ,:
I ~: : I \1 i
J' , I II I fil ~
j ~ I ,I; ~ie? I
~ !ill 11'1 j If II ~
!Hi Ilirl~,
III "~
-----
1
..-___ .M
..\
~
a:
7
)<
II.
cr.
II.
a:
(;
Cl:
.'
-
.
SECI10N N.
ADDENDUM
The lease between the City of San Diego and San Diego National
Sports Training Foundation contains sections that apply to the
management of training programs on Lower Otay Reservoir. The
following sections of the lease are incorporated by reference into this
Facilities Management Plan:
Section 1.2, Docks
Section 1.3, Water Area
Section 1.5, Priority of Public Use
Section 1.9, Competent Management
.
Section 1.11, Parking
Section 1.12, Lake and Shoreline Access
.
10
) 1--) {5 ~ i;r
...... 4'f
.
Parking Plan
.
.
Jl-/6 _[-I;
~$
.
OLYMPIC TRAINING CENTER
BOATHOUSE PARKING PLAN
.
The Olympic Training Center Boathouse will be located on the shore
of Lower Otay Reservoir, on land leased from the City of San Diego.
The boathouse site is directly across from the main Olympic
Training Center Campus. The facility will be accessed via a
decomposed-granite road, to be constructed from Wueste Road to the
boathouse, and connecting with an existing dirt road that parallels
the shoreline (see Site Plan, figure 1).
Thirty-eight spaces are provided for parking at the boathouse. This
parking requirement was determined based on assumptions related
to the anticipated training program that will be conducted from the
facility. An average of 60 athletes is expected to train on a daily
basis from the boathouse. Approximately one-half of these athletes
are expected to live and work off-site: that is, not on the OTC
campus, but in separate housing throughout San Diego County. These
30 athletes would therefore drive to the facility each day, requiring
a minimum of 30 onsite parking spaces. In addition, the coaches,
trainers and boathouse coordinator will require parking spaces: thus
an additional 8 spaces have been planned to insure sufficient parking
will be available.
.
On occassion, special programs may generate activity that will
require additional parking for participants. and possibly spectators.
Special events that will generate over 100 spectators will not be
allowed at the boathouse unless a special permit has been applied
for and received from the cities of San diego and Chula Vista.
Procuring a special permit for these events will require the
submittal of detailed parking and shuttle plans. It is expected that
parking for these events will occur at the Visitor Center where
fromm 200-400 spaces will be available.. Participants will be
shuttled to the boathouse, and spectators will walk or be shuttled to
the viewing point adjacent to the athletic fields on the main
campus, and/or be shuttled to the City of San Diego launch facility
on Lower Otay Reservoir, located south of the boathouse.
.
.Total spaces in visitor lot: for phase I - 233
at buildout - 46.7
/tje~5V
'!~
.
OTC Parking Plan, page 2
.
Minor events, such as a team time trial, will not require a special
event permit. Parking and shuttling planning for these small
occasions will be in accordance with this parking plan.
Figure 2, 'Parking Plan,' provides a visual exhibit of the Parking and
Shuttle plan. When parking beyond 38 spaces is required due to a
special activity at the boathouse, participants and spectators will
be required to park at the Olympic Training Center Visitor's Center
parking lot. Training Center shuttles will be available to transfer
participants and spectators to the boathouse. The boathouse deck
and grass area, which can comfortably accomodate up to 200 people,
will be used for both participants and specators for these small
events. Spectators will also be advised that they may walk or be
shuttled by van to the spectator outlook located adjacent to the
track and field facilities. This overlook, which provides a
spectacular panoramic view of the Reservoir, can accomodate an
additional 100 spectators.
.
Jl-IIJ~5J
Air
.
(DLOlIEP ~~EO C;~Afrrjl':'l ACC!Uo<<OAO
/....NO,.n...ING...J:~. .
" ......
"~. ~ "-. .-:,;. -'-
'.. ':'~.;..
," ~ ",
: " '..: .'.
" ,\~...:..
\"
~~.
\'~{"
,'t
."-
TCW'fl:'~ rl>'lOC"T'GIl
';~"Clfl; ""tMCU "........
c.
~
.IDG<<.A"I'T"E'''T'''-.... 0
. ~ a: ...,.."
~<~'~--.-r:-.=: _ I:; f';' ----,",
f!! .' I ;" "
fJufF ~_
:::i L~/ . (;D~ "AGE
:;:'I'~ .' -^"",,- ,', .
,>; i \'
'// . ,..t- . "
. J'~_~.. '/
/'. 1,~
I:
..-
........
.t.--,....
.-.,-".
"
,/)\ \ \
ID5TING E1JCAL'r1'TUI GlDr"I-..... ,_). \
;:.0.;) ,-
L ~-(r~l '~0\
.....,~~l ~:~ /J - \ .~---
) 'J I'~' \ 0
,( '-' \ ~
'-I ~ .
-"::ci :::'.. :~ I~_\ 1,-/'( ')' ')-
.-'; ~--j I"~ :
/W------
/ /
.\~,
, ~P'OP'\lLUSfJ1:EWOJ\lnl(~ONWOOU)
~ .~tcf:
..
-
0~'T_MnA.ot-
.~! \
\_)". 3' \IIloOO::l1\HD & 1'051 fENCE
'fO...mtC'l'~~~
/ """'''fOo''' ~4'
/0
UIInNl"j YlGET,.r..TION TO t!fr04"'IH
NEW aUE'::::.:!! AGItIFC.1A (O"'~l
t.',WICl'
!IAN" rAntN"y
....UAI~
'!1JRf
1.1IllI1l'Ie'fA__
.......-
....,--
~
e
.
SITE PLAN
FIGURE 1
; it] ~S-;L
~t
.
.
.
SPECTATOR PARKING
,
"-
,
,
.
/
.-} TO CITY OF SAN DI,EGO LAUNCH AACILlTY
PARKING PLAN /1.--/3--5'3
FIGURE 2
.
Mitigation Monitoring Program
.
.
)YB~.5'-!
~ro
I
-,-"
=.
iJ
!J
I)
I)
11
11
11
~. ~
1\
~
II
~
,
.'
.
"
..
~
II
OTC BOATHOUSE FACILITY
DRAFT
MITIGA TION MONITORING PROGRAM
IN ACCORDANCE WITH AB 3180
APRIL 1992
J1)(J0'f
.......
,5'(
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
,
'.
,
,
,
I
I
I
I
Ie
,
,
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
The mitigation monitoring program is prepared for the City of Chula Vista for the Olympic
Training Center (OTC) Boathouse Facility project to comply with AS 3180, which requires
public agencies to adopt such programs to ensure effective implementation of mitigation
measures. This monitoring program is dynamic in that it will undergo changes as
additional mitigation measures are identified and additional conditions of approval are
placed on the project throughout the project approval process.
This program will serve a dual purpose of verifying completion of the mitigation measures
for the proposed project and generating information on the effectiveness of the mitigation
measures to guide future decisions. The Program includes the following:
. Monitoring team qualifications
. Specific monitoring activities
. Reporting system
. Criteria for evaluating the success of the mitigation measures
The project involves the land development of 3.1 acres for the OTC Boathouse facility and
. . .
0.07 water surface acre for the proposed dock and ramp. It is located in the eastern
territories area of Chula Vista, immediately west of Lower Otay Reservoir. The property
lies approximately 8 miles east of downtown Chula Vista and 8 miles north of the
US/Mexican border. The site is generally flat with elevations ranging from approximately
480 feet above mean sea level (msl) at the lake edge to about SOO feet msl at the proposed
parking lot area. The surrounding area is characterized by the rura1 Otay Reservoir and
undeveloped nearby hillsides. The developing communities of eastern Chula Vista (Le.,
Eastlake) are located to the weSL The site is bounded by Wueste Road and the developing
OTC site to the west, the existing City of San Diego boat launching facility to the south,
and other City and County facilities toward the south end of the reservoir.
The property is within City of Chula Vista incorporated boundaries. County of San Diego
jurisdiction borders to the site's north and east; these areas include North Point, the lake
and lands to the east. The City of San Diego owns the Lower Otay Reservoir and
surrounding lake front areas which include the proposed Boathouse site.
OJ057JOOO
1
;tflJ ~st
J
-- .,,,
.
The SEIR environmental analysis. incorporated herein as reference. focused on issues
determined to be potentially significant by the City of Chula Vista. The environmental
analysis concluded that for 6 of the 7 environmental issues discussed. some of the
significant and potentially significant impacts could be avoided or reduced through
implementation of recommended mitigation measures. The 6 is$ue areas are recreational
land use compatibility; aesthetics/visual resources; geology and soils; hydrology/water
quality; biological resources; and traffic/circulation. No significant adverse cultural
resource impacts were identified.
AB 3180 requires monitoring of only those impacts identified as significant or potentially
significant; the monitoring program for the ~TC Boathouse therefore addresse~ the impacts
associated with the issue areas identified above.
Mitivation Monitnrin2 Team
.
A monitoring team should be identified once the mitigation measures have been adopted as
conditions of approval by the Chula Vista City Council. Managing the team would be the
responsibility of the Mitigation Compliance Coordinator (MCC). The monitoring activities
will be~ccomplished by the Environmental Monitors (EMs), Environmental Specialists
(ESs). and the MCC. While specific qualifications should be determined by the City of
Chula Vista, the monitoring team should possess the following capabilities:
. Interpersonal. decision-making. and management skills with demonstrated
experienc~ in working under trying field circumstances;
. Knowledge of and appreciation for the general environmental attributes and
special features found in the project area;
. Knowledge of the types of environmental impacts associated with construction
of cost-effective mitigation options; and
. Excellent communication skills.
The responsibilities of the MCC throughout the monitoring effon include the following:
.
.
Overall implementation and management of the monitoring program
Quality control of the site-development monitoring team.
Administration and preparation of daily logs. status reports. compliance reports
and the final constrUCtion monitoring repon.
/t/Ij/S?
.
.
1
010571000
.L
(I
(I
.
(J
.
~
1J
rJ
rJ
~
~
,
,
~
I
J
~
~
~_ J3
.
.
"
Ie
I
I
. Liaison between the Oty of Chula Vista, the OTC Boathouse developer, and the
applicant's contractors:
.
. Monitoring of onsite. day-to-day construcpon activities. including the direction
of EMs and ESs in the understanding of all pennit conditions. site-specific
project requirements, construction schedules and environmental quality control
effort.
. Ensure contractor knowledge of and compliance with all appropriate permit
conditions.
. Review of all construction impact mitigations and, if need be. propose
additional mitigation.
. Have the authority to require correction of activities observed that violate project
environmental conditions or that represent unsafe or dangerous conditions,
. Maintain prompt and regular communication with the onsite EMs and ESs, and
OTC Boathouse persoMel responsible for contractor performance and permit
compliance,
The primary role of the Environmental Monitors is to serve as an extension of the MCC in
performing the quality control functions at the construction sites. Their responsibilities and
functioD"S are to: .
a) Maintain a working knowledge of the OTC Boathouse permit conditions.
contract documents. construction schedules and progress and any special
mitigation requirements for his or her assigned construction area;
b) Assist the MCC and OTC Boathouse construction contractors in coordinating
with Oty of Chula Vista compliance activities;
c) Observe construction activities for compliance with the City of Chula Vista
pernUtconditions;and
d) Pr9vide frequent verbal briefings to the MCC and construction personnel. and
assist the MCC as necessary in preparing status reports.
The primary role of the Environmental Specialists is to provide expertise when
environmentally sensitive issues occur throughout the development phases of project
implementation and to provide direction for mitigation.
010571000
3
/tffJ v)~
1-
N
.
flltj~.51
---=-
010571000
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'I
I
I
~
t
t
.
Prne:ram Proc&luraI Guid~line!ii
Prior to any construction activities, meetings should take place between all the parties
involved to initiate the monitoring program and establish the responsibility and authority of
the participants. Mitigation measures which need to be defmed in greater detail will be
addressed prior to any project plan approvals in follow-up meetings designed to discuss
specific monitoring effects.
.
An effective reporting system must be established prior to any monitoring efforts. All
parties involved must have a c:lear understanding of the mitigation measures as adopted and
- .
these mitigations must be distributed to the participants of the monitoring effon. Those that
would have a complete list of all the mitigation measure adopted by the City of Chula Vista
would include the City of Chula Vista, the City of San Diego, OTC Boathouse developer,
the MCC and the construction crew supervisor. The MCC would distribute to each
Environmental Specialist and Environmental Monitor a specific list of mitigation measures
that pertain to his or her monitoring tasks and the appropriate time frame that these
mitigations are anticipated to be implemented. In addition to the list of mitigations, the
monito~ will have; mitigation monitoring report (MMR) forms with each mitigation written
out on the top of the form. Below the stated mitigation measure, the form will have a series
of questions addressing the effectiveness of the mitigation measure. The monitors shall
complete the MMR and file it with the MCC following their monitoring activity. The MCC
will then include the conclusions of the MMR into an interim and final comprehensive
construction report to be submitted to the City of Chula Vista. This report will describe the
major accomplishments of the monitoring program, summarize problems encountered in
achieving the goals of the program, evaluate solutions developed to overcome problems
and provide a list of recommendations for future monitoring programs. In addition and if
appropriate, each EM, and/or ES will be required to fill out and submit a daily log report to
the MCC. The daily log report will be used to record and account for the monitoring
activities of the monitor. Weekly/monthly status reports, as determined appropriate, will be
generated from the daily logs and compliance reports and will include supplemental material
(i.e., memoranda, telephone logs, letters). This type of feedback is essential for the City of
Chula Vista to conform the implementation and effectiveness of the mitigation measures
imposed on the project.
.
4
55
,
r.
~
o
o
a
a
~
~
~
Actions in Ca..c;e of Non~ompliance
There IU'e generally three separate categories of non-comp1iancc associated with the adopted
conditions of approval:
. Non-compliancc requiring an inuncdiate halt to a specific task or piece of
equipment
. Infrac:tion that initiates an immediate corrective action. No work or task delay.
. Infraction that docs not warrant inuncdiate corrective action and results in no
work or task delay.
In all three cases, the MCC would notify the OTC contractor and the City of Chula Vista.
and an MMR would be filed with the MCC on a daily basis.
There IU'e a number of options the City of Chula Vista may use to enforce this Program
should non-compliance continue. Some methods commonly used by other lead agencies
include "stop work" orders; fmes and penalties (civil); restitution; permit revocations;
citations; and injunctions. It is essential that all parties involved in the Program understand
the authprity and responsibility of the onsite monitors. Decisions regarding actions in case
of non-compliance are the responsibility of the City of Chula Vista.
I
I
I
1
I
I'
The following text includes a summary of the project impacts. and a list of all the associated
mitigation measures with the monitoring efforts necessary to ensure that the measures IU'e
properly implemented incorporated into the measures. All the mitigation measures
identified in the SEIR IU'e anticipated to be translated into conditions of project approval. In
addition. once the project has been approved and prior to its implementation. the mitigation
measures shall be further detailed.
SUMMARY OF PROJECT IMPACTS AND MITIGATION MEASURES
,-.
I
,
The following text includes a summary of the project impacts. a list of all the associated
mitigation measures and the monitoring efforts necessary to ensure that the measures IU'e
properly implemented. All the mitigation measures identified in the SEIR IU'e recommended
to be translated into conditions of project approval and IU'e stated herein in language
appropriate for such conditions. In addition, once the Boathouse facility project has been
approved and during various stages of implementation. the mitigation measures shall be
OJ057JOOO
5
/1fj /t 0
'.t.
.ld
.
3. F1shing tournaments: OTC training activities shall either be prohibited or restricted
on permitted fishin.g tournament days (occasional Saturdays during fishing season;
permitted through the City of San Diego WUD). This regulation shall be
specifically addressed in the Facilities Management Plan to the satisfaction of the
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
1
1
~
1
1
~
a
D
.
further detailed by the designated monitors. City of Chula Vista, City of San Diego and the
applicanL
Recreational UH Compatibility/Operations
Sum~ of In,pacts
Potentially significant land use impacts involve project inconsistency with the existing Otay
Lake recreational uses. This potential operational incompatibility impact is due to the
locations of the two respective facilities. their differing activities and the nature of the
proposed OTC boat courses. The proposed OTC Boathouse would operate the OTC
canoes, kayaks and sculls in the recreational bOats' commonly used path's to fishing
locations and/or recreational spots across the lake.
Mitilmtion Mea~s
.
. 1. During fishing season days (Wednesday. Saturday and Sunday, mid-January
through mid-October), OTC boats will not have exclusive rights to use of the OTC
~e trials. course of up to eight lanes (identified in Figure 2-7 of the SEIR). The.
OTC boats will have exclusive use of the OTC training course (three lanes) on those
days. This rule shall be included in the Facilities Management Plan (FMP).
Further. this rule shall be monitored and its effectiveness included in the Quarterly
Management Reports (QMRs) required below.
2. Boat course crossings: In the event motorized fishing boats warrant crossing the
path of a rowing scull/boat underway, the crossing shall occur either in back of
(after) the rowers, or a minimum of s9c1:rs in front of the rowers. Because the
rowers go "backwards" and are more difficult to turn, this should avoid crossing
conflicts. This regulation should be posted at the City boat launch facility and
communicated to the public as recommended below under "Public Education"
Measure #8.
,
/vj(3 ~~ (
!Ji
<<
'-
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
"
I
I
(
(
I
I
.
(
City WUD, and should be monitored and included in the Quanerly Management
Repons to detennine if adjustments become neCessary. The OTC shall be notified
of dates of pennitted fishing tournaments no later than two months prior to the
tournament date.
4. During the fishing season on Lower Otay Reservoir (approximately mid-January
through mid-October), shells, canoes and kayaks will be required to restrict
activities on the three days per week when fishing is allowed (Wednesday,
Saturday, and Sunday). The OTC boats will remain 150 feet from the Reservoir
shoreline on all fishing days, except in the area delineated in Figure 3-4 of the
SEIR, in order to avoid conflict with shoreline fishing activities. The feasibility of
the ISO-buffer shall be monitored in conjunction with lake-level monitoring
(Measure *9 below).
Wa~rfowl Huntin~_ Consideration~:
S. During the months of the waterfowl hunting season (approximately mid-October
throu"gh mid-January) rowing and paddling will be prohibited during the hunting
~ours of d;1wn to noon on the two days per week that hunting is allowed at Lower
Otay Reservoir (Wednesday and Saturday). In addition, at all times during this
season - in order to provide continuous resting area for waterfowl - shells, canoes,
and kayaks will be restricted from activity in the Harvey Arm of the Reservoir.
Other Meac;ures.
"
6. Special events: No special events/competitions of over 100 people shall be allowed
at the OTC boathouse or lake under this approval. This restriction shall not include
typical training competition between OTC training athletes included in the OTC
program (provided that no more than 100 spectators attend). Said provisions shall
be included in the Facilities Management Plan. Any future requests for
competitions shall be subject to CEQA review and review by the Cities of Chula
Vista and San Diego.
7. Athletes and OTC employee education: During orientation of athletes and
employees to the boathouse, the lake's public uses and schedules shall be fully
described. Lake rules and regulations and public use sc:hedules shall be posted in
010571000
7
) '1(3 --?d--
.... 52
f
.
written form at the boathouse, and shall be included in the overall training program
of the athletes. Said provisions shall be included in the Facilities Management Plan, '
and adherence to rules should be monitored in the Quarterly Management Reports.
8. Public education: In order to educate the public of the OTC lake activities and thus
;nirnize use conflicts, the following items are recommended. These items should
be in place prior to OTC boathouse occupancy, and should be monitored in the
Quarterly Management Reports.
• An information sign at the lake rum -off at Wueste Road/Otay Lakes Road shall
be posted, identifying the OTC facilities and a radio channel from which lake 1
use information can be derived
• The radio channel shall inform listeners of the OTC activities (i.e., training
times, rules of the lake), public use information (i.e., open days, tournaments,
• lake conditions), ecological sensitivity of the area and associated protection f
rules, and lake use rules which must be reviewed prior to boat launching or
ticket purchase. If this mitigation measure is pursued, funding for the radio i
station-will be determined at a later date. ■
• At the City boat launch, prior to purchase of tickets or boat launching, the lake
user should be required to read and acknowledge the rules of the lake. It is
recommended that this will be the responsibility of the City of San Diego WUD.
9. Lake levels: Lake level data shall be included in each Quarterly Management Report
(derived from the City WUD), to provide for ongoing monitoring of the lake
surface area available for use. Should lake levels show signs of continued decline,
the matter should be raised with the Users' Council and OTC, to determine potential
refinements to lake use regulations. This monitoring and potential resulting actions
should guarantee equitable shared use of the lake. Lake fluctuations and potential
adjustments in OTC training areas should be identified in the Facilities Management
Plan, acknowledging that the lake is for both public and OTC uses.
10. Navy Rescue Training: the USOC/OTC shall meet with the Navy to determine an
equitable shared use of the lake. It may be that notification by the Navy to the OTC
of future days and locations of practice rescue will be adequate to reduce potential
010571000 GJ
I.
I
I
J
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
D
o.
1
conflict. This agreement shall be included in the Facilities Management Plan prior
to issuance of building permits. The effectiveness of the agreement shall be
included in the Quanc:rly Management Reports, as necessary.
11. Facility Management Plan (FMP): Prior to the issuan~ of building permits. the
FMP shall be revised to inclUde the above mitigation items. In addition. the
following itemS are recommended to be added to the FMP:
. Dock operations and OTC boat launching operations should be described.
Provisions to minimize impacts to the surrounding ecology (especially while
launching) should be specified in the operations plan.
. OTC motor boats (coach launches) should be quantified (estimated no more
than 4 boats). Provisions for launching (at the City launch site); storage (at
OTC docks. and when to be out of the lake); fueling and repair should be
delineated in the FMP. Fueling shall be conducted using the "pop-on/off'
tanks, which would be stored at the OTC main site and brought to the
boathouse when necessary. Only minor repairs should be conducted at the
boathouse.
...
. Athletes, employees and visitors shall be educated regarding the lake rules and.
importantly, the sensitivity of the adjacent ecology of the area Parlcing shall be
by permit only, and to load/off.load boats. Signs shall further be posted,
subject to the review of the Oty of Chula Vista, at locations along the lake (to
be determined), to provi4e for public education and protection of sensitive
habitat. Maps shall be posted at the OTC site which identify protected and/or
prohibited areas. Walkways and trails shall be clearly marked (refer also to
Biology mitigation. Section 3.6).
. The OTC shall notify the City of San Diego WUD of any OTC event requiring
exclusive use of the course two months prior to the event.
"
Mnnitrarin2
Monitoring for the above mitigation measures will be in the form of Quarterly Management
Repons (QMRs). The USOC/OTC shall be responsible for preparation of the QMRs.
010571000
,
!L/(J~h'l ~
C,c
Information to be recorded includes but is not limited to: daily use of the boathouse facility
including number and types of boats used and schedules, any boat crossing conflicts,
number of athletes each day, visitors, etc. The USOClOTC, City WUD, and Lakes
Committee or User's Council shall work together to develop the scope, fonnal. schedule
and review/comment system of the QMRs. These three entities shall comprise the QMR
"review committee."
Items included in the mitigation measures above shall also be incorporated into the QMR
system. Future additional desired lake uses which may be requested should also be
considered by the review committee and reported in the QMRs.
.
Further, to obtain input as to the effectiveness of ongoing lake operations, comment forms
shall be provided to the OTC coaches, athletes and site manager. and to the City of San
Diego boat launch facility for input from the public (forms could be provided at the time of
ticket purchase, and f1l1ed out as desired by lake users). The results of these comment
forms shall be incorporated into each QMR and reviewed/considered by the three reviewing
entities, or review committee (OTC, City of San Diego and User's Council).
10
/113 -t5
.....-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
~
The Facilities Management Plan (FMP) discussed under Mitigation Measure #11 shall be
, .
reviewed by the City of San Diego and Chula Visla prior to the issuance of building
permits.
Aestbetics/Visual Resources
Summa~ of In,pacts
The proposed OTC Boathouse facility development would change the appearance of the
project site which is primarily characterized as recreational and natural open space adjacent
to the Lower Olay Lake. Given the natural aesthetics of the lake environment, any
development in the immediate area would constitute a potential significant impact on its
rural character and visual quality. The Boathouse structure could potentially impact public
views from Wueste Road to Lower Olay Lake. The project specific impact is partially
mitigated by project design and landscaping.
.
010S71000
1:/
.
.
I
.
.
I.
I
I
I
~
I
I
.
I
I
I
'-
I
Mitigation Mea~ures
12. As .tion of project (CUP) approval. the boathouse strUcture shall be
redesigned to a Ie . t Said design plans reflecting the lower StrUcture shall
~-
be submitted for review and appro the City of ChuIa Vista as a part of the
City Design Review process. prior to issuance 0 . g permits. Further. the
City of San Diego shall be invited to review and comment on vised design
plans. prior to approval of the project's City of San Diego lease permit
13. Final Landscape Plans for the project. including revegetation areas. shall
incorporate species of a type and size (especially height) acceptable to the City of
Chula Vista Landscape Architect and City Planning Department Further. the City
shall provide the City of San Diego the opportUnity to review and comment on the
plans prior to final approval by the City of Chula Vista, facilitating the blending of
the project's landscaping with nearby City of San Diego recreational areas.
MonitorinSl
Design.plans for the boathouse structure will require the review and approval by the City of
Chula Vista prior to issuance of grading permits. Revised design plans will also be subject
to review by the City of San Diego. prior to approval of the project's City of San Diego
lease permit
The City of Chula Vista Landscape Architect and the City of San Diego will review the fina1
landscape plans. The USoc. or other entity acceptable to the City. shall be responsible for
the monitoring of health and growth of the site's landscaped areas and revegetation areas
for a period acceptable to the project biologist This monitoring is required to ensure the
survival of native species and revegetation areas. An environmental specialist in
coordination with the project biologist will be responsible for ensuring that mitigation is
properly implemented at both the preconstruction and site preparation phases.
010571000
11
;t/{j/it
.~
.
A qualified geologist/environmental specialist shall be responsible for monitoring the
implementation of these mitigation measures. In addition, the geologist/environmental
specialist shall be onsite throughout the entire grading phase of the project to ensuring
proper implementation and to be available to make decisions on issues not originally
anticipated.
F/{J---J,?
~
I
I
I
I
I
I
m
I
I
I
m
m
m
m
m
D
D
o
63
.
Geology/Soils
Summarv of Impact<
Geologic constraints onsite include inundation by seiche, soil expansion and settlement,
and seismicity. These conditions and potential impacts can be mitigated to a level of
insignificance by mitigation measures proposed herein, including subsequent site specific
eanhwotk analysis, sensitive grading and standard grading/site preparation procedures.
Miti~ation Mea.sure~
The following mitigation measures will reduce geologic impacts on the project site to below
a level of significance. These mitigations specifically address possible lithologic and
seismic impacts.
.
14. Clayey expansive portions of the Sweetwater Formation will be excluded from the
upper three feet of subgrade to reduce the potential for damaged foundations (lCG
Inc. 1990).
...
IS. Buildings and structures designed as specified by the Uniform Building Code in
regards to the possible earthquake intensities will minimize the potential for
damage. Stucco walls and C-type masonry should be avoided if possible.
16. Problems due to expansive soils will be compensated by selective grading and
specially designed foundations as set forth in the Uniform Building Code.
17. Erosional rates will be minimized through erosional control measures such as
maintaining vegetative cover and vegetated buffer zones.
Monitorini
11
010571000
.
! .
,
I
,
~
.
I
~
11
~.,
Q
-.
q
,
Hydrolol)'lWater Quality
Summarv nf lmnacts
Project development will increase runoff onto sensitive areas such as the Otay Reservoir,
resulting in a potential impact on the potable water supply of the Otay Reservoir. Grading
and utility plans for the proposed Boathouse facility include provisions for a drainage
system that will divert runoff to a "soak away basin" where storm water will be .filtered to
remove particulate matter and dissolved chemicals prior to discharge into Otay Reservoir
(proposed as mitigation). Potential water q~ity impacts would result from ~e discharge
of urban runoff contaminants from parking lots, drives and other surfaces into the Otay
Lakes Reservoir.
Mitiiatinn Measures
18. Specific project plans will be subject to review and approval of the City of Chula
Vista in cooperation with the City of San Diego.
19. A preliminary grading and utility plan was included as part of the Soakaway Basin
Conceptual Design Report. Final design plan submittals shall be consistent with the
conceptual plans and approved by Cities of Chula Vista and San Diego and the
County Hplth Department prior to issuance of a final grading permit.
-
20. Pad drainage shall be designed to collect and direct surface waters away from
proposed structures to approved drainage facilities. For lawn and parking areas, a
minimum gradient of two percent sha1l be maintained and drainage shall be directed
toward approved swales or drainage facilities. Drainage patterns approved at the
time of final grading should be maintained throughout the life of proposed
structures.
Runoff from roof and concrete deck surfaces shall be diverted to the soakaway
basin as described in Surface Drainage Impacts and the Soakaway Basin
Conceptual Design Report (Appendix E of the SEIR). Final improvement plans
shall be consistent with the conceptual document and approved by the Cities of
ChuIa Vista and San Diego and the County Health Depanment prior to issuance of a
010571000
13
P-J{)~~g/
Co/!
~
grading pennit. Issuance of the grading pennit. shall also be contingent upon the
establishment of a maintenance agreement between the City. of San Diego and the
STF/USOC for the soakaway (including provisions for soil and piping
replacement, etc.), or waiver of such agreement by the City.
21. Erosional Control: Slopes shall be planted with appropriate drought-resistant
vegetation as recommended by a landscape arcbitect immediately following grading.
Slopes should not be over-irrigated as heavy groundcover combined with over-
watering is a primary source of surficial slope failures. Tuner-controlled irrigation I
should be altered during the rainy season.
22. Maintenance of Drainage Devices: -Graded berms, swales, area drains, and slopes I
are designed to carry surface water from pad areas and shall not be blocked or t
destroyed. Water will not be allowed to pond in pad areas, or over top and flow
down graded or natural slopes.
23. Erosion potential during the construction phase of the project shall be controlled I
.
through the proper use of erosional control measures, the maintenance of vegetative I
-Puffers and timely planning of inundation to avoid peak rainy seasons.
24. Development of the subject project and the East1ake m project, in general, must t
comply with all applicable regulations established by the United States I
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as set forth in the National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements for urban runoff and
stormwater discharge. I
25. Specific project plans for surface drainage into Otay Lakes shall be subject to I
review and approval by the city of Chula Vista, the RWQCB and the County Health
Department. At that time, the project applicant may be required to divert all surface I
runoff from the site away from the reservoir.
26. Sources of uncontrolled water, such as leaky water pipes or drains shall be I
immediately repaired if identified.
. Erosion control devices discussed previously. would significantly reduce the I
27.
sediment load in the runoff waters. Devices constrUCted to drain and protect slopes, .
14 )1--/(5 / t '1 OJOS7JOOO &J
--..
I
I-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I.
.
including brow ditches, benns,retention basins, terrace drains (if utilized) and
down drains shall be maintained regularly, and in particular, shall not be allowed to
clog so that water can flow unchecked over slope faces.
Monitorinv
A qualified hydrologist/environmental specialist, working with the City of Chula Vista's
Engineer/Public Works Department, will ensure that the mitigation measures are effectively
implemented. It will be the responsibility of the City to ensure confonnance with all
applicable City flood control, Otay Water District and State Regional Water Quality Control
Board regulations prior to issuance of grading permits.
Biological Resources
Sum~ of ImnacL~
Construction of the training facilities at this site would result in impacts to Diegan coastal
sage scrub (approximately 3.0 acres) and wetland (0.1 acre) that is primarily freshwater
marsh.,
Indirect impacts as a result of the construction of the facility at this site could include
erosion and sliding of materials into wetland habitats. Any movement of material into
wetland habitats would be considered a significant adverse impact. Indirect impacts to
California gnatcatchers as a result of increased human access and activity on this site is
considered potentially significant.
Cumulative impacts include the loss of habitat and potentially occurring sensitive species
populations on a reponal basis due to increased human activity on the reservoir. The
cumulative loss of Diegan coastal sage scrub and potentially occurring sensitive species is
considered a significant adverse impact.
Mitivation M~a~~s
28. Approximately 0.6 acre of high quality Diegan coastal sage scrub will be impacted
by grading for the road and approximately 2.4 acres of disturbed Diegan coastal
sage scrub will be impacted by construction of the boathouse. A 2:1 mitigation
010S71 000
15
/ t/ I} --71)
{;0
.
ratio will be used for the high quality sage scrub (1.2 acre). and a 1:1 ratio will be
used for the disturbed sage scrub (2.4 acres). A total of 3.6 acres of Diegan
coastal sage scrub will be planted OD the two southern most slopes OD the west side
of the Olympic Training Center adjacent to the Salt Creek dedicated open space.
The proposed mitigation area is shown in Figure 2-3 of the SEIR. Sensitive plant
species should be used in the coastal sage scrub restoration if available. In
addition. all areas disturbed by grading around the Olympic Training Center
boathouse (mcluding the access road) will be revegetated with coastal sage scrub.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
i
i
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
29. Since no areas exist around the lake margin to restore freshwater marsh habitat,
impacts to freshwater marsh (0.1 acre) habitat shall be mitigated out-of-kind by
planting native riparian tree species 8l0ng the lake margin. outside of the freshwater
marsh fringe. It is proposed that 20 Fremont cottonwoods (Populus fremontil) be
planted at intetVals around the margin of the lake.
.
30. Human access shall be reduced along the coastal sage scrub areas on the project site
with signs and barrier plantings; and. access to the coastal sage scrub mitigation
areas shall be restricted on the Olympic Training Center site.
1
31. The proposed mitigation areas shall be approved by City of San Diego and City of
Chula Vista staff in consultation with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service and the
California Department of Fish and Game.
32. Remedial measures such as restricting shoreline access year round shall be
implemented through signage and/or barrier plantings.
Monitorin,
.
A specific revegetation plan must be implemented by the project applicant in coordination
with the project biologist/environmental specialist. The Plan will be approved by the City
of San Diego and City of Chula Vista Planning Department prior to issuance of a grading
permit. Procedures will be monitored by a qualified biologist/environmental specialist
during the landscaping and/or site preparation phase. The boathouse manager will be
responsible for including a discussion of the timing and distance the floating dock was
moved each year in the Quaiterly Management Report.
-
16
/t/(J -7/
010S7 1000 ~
....... I: V
. Trame and CI~eulation
I
I
I
I
Ie
I
I
I
I
I
I
,.
I
Summa", of lrrq)acts
World class competitions. occurring once every several years could draw up to 2,000
spectators. These larger events may potentially result in tempprary traffic congestion.
Lack of parking spaces may also occur during small events (less than 100 spectators).
Therefore, during the small and world-class events, spectators and visitors could be
transponed by shuttle buses to the Boathouse site from the Olympic Training Center and
neighboring parking centers.
The proposed Boathouse project would -have a minimal contribution tei long term
cumulative traffic volumes, however, measures were incorporated in the OTC project to
mitigate cumulative traffic impacts to acceptable levels.
MlbptlOn Mea~s
I
1
_1
I
I
!
33. During small events with less than 100 spectators, shuttling of people from the
-DTC maiI) campus area will be required once the OTC Boathouse parking lot.
which has 38 spaces. is full.
34. To mitigate potential traffic congestion impacts associated with large special events,
which requires restrictive use of all or a portion of Lower Otay Reservoir. the
USOC will be required to obtain a permit from the City of San Diego Water Utilities
Department with the City of Chula Vista being advised of the same. Requests for
special events will be made through the City of San Diego, and will include
information on the event date and tiIne(s). estimated number of boats to be involved
in the competition and an estimate of the number of spectators. if any, expected to
attend. The City [of San Diego Water Utilities Department] will indicate. in
approving any special event. conditions under which the event may be held,
including requirements for event notices. course marshals, traffic controls. special
event signage and potential compensation for lost revenue if applicable. The City of
San Diego has jurisdictional authority over the use of Lower Otay Lake. However.
access to Lower Otay Lakes is via Telegraph Canyon RoadlOtay Lakes Road.
future Orange Avenue, and Wueste Road. which are now within, or will be within
(after annexation). the jurisdictional authority of the City of Chula Vista.
010571000
17
Jt/fj-7dA
ti
~
18
/t/{3-7)
I
I
I
,-
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
.
Therefore. the City of Chula Vista may also require pennits for special events and
may specify the conditions under which special events may be held.
Measures to mitigate significant cumulative re1aIed impacts from development of the eastern
tenitories are included in the F'mal EIR for the OTC Plan and the EastLake m (GDp) F'mal
EDt
Monit{'uinsr
The City of Chula Vista Engineer/Public Works Department and the City of San Diego
Water Utilities Department will be responsible for ensuring that the USOC incorporates
conditions under which special events may be held and that conditions lire properly
enforced during such events. The City of San Diego Water Utilities Department and the
City of Chula Vista will monitor the first scheduled special event to evaluate the
effectiveness of the conditions established by the special event pennit issued by each
department
.
OTHER MITIGATION
...
Additional conditions of approval placed on the project by the City of Chula Vista shall be
subject to monitoring at the direction of the City.
.
0/0$7/000 .
........
bY
.
.
...r-
.
mE CITY OF CHUU nSTA PARTY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Statement of disclosure of certain ~ership interests, payments, or campaign contrIbutions, 01 all matters
which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council, Planning Commission, and all other
official bodies. The following information must be disclosed: .
1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the contract, ~
~"'~klfq:~
San Diego National Sports Training Foundation (Project developer)
United States Qlympic Committee (Project operator)
City of San Diego (Property owner/lessor)
2. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all
individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership
interest in the partnership.
3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is non-profit organization or a trust, list the names
of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or
trustor of the trust.
~pp ;I'tt;lr"ned
4. Have you had more than $2S0 worth of business transacted with any member of the City staff,
Boards, Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months? Yes_
No _ If yes, please indicate person(s):
. .
5. Please identify each and every person, including any agents, emplpyees, consultants or independent
contractors who you have assigned to represent you before the City in this matter.
T !:III"''''' ~ J. McKinlev: McKinlev /SoPac .
Matt Peterson: Peterson & Price
6. .
Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggregate, contnbuted 7than $1,000 to a
Councilmember in the current or preceding election period? Yes _ No If yes, state which
Councilmember(s):
flli2n is dermed as: oAnyilldividual,r";'" eD-partIlenhip,joinl V7itl/jOll, I<<ial elub.fratn7lJll mganizaliDll, eOl'pOration,
estale, trJU~ I'tIceiver, 6yndieate, thU and any other l:OulII)'. ei/y /' eoulll1)'. ity. nwnieipality, distriet or other politieallubdivision,
or any other group or eortlbinluion acting QI a unit.O
(NOTE: AI\aC~ additional pages as necessary) .' 7 ~
Date: >,:: /, (ql y G/L
, SIgnature of contractorl Iicant
..
IA.J 13\A:DISCLOSE. TXTJ
San Diego National Sports Training Foundation
Print or type name of contractor/applicant
JL!(j/?1 ~;r
---.-----
.
.
.
UNITED STATE OLYMPIC COMMllll:b
Mr. Robert H. Helmick, President
Mr. Michael Lenard, Vice President
Mr. George Steinbrenner, Vice President
Mr. William B. Tutt, Vice President
Mr. Charles U. Foster, Secretary
Dr. LeRoy Walker, Treasurer
Ms. Anita DeFrantz, IOC Representative
Dr. Harvey W. Schiller, Executive Director
SAN DIEGO NATIONAL SPORTS TRAINING FOUNDATION
Councilwoman Gloria D. McColl
Mr. Paul C. Barkley
Mr. C. Terry Brown
Mr. Malin Burnham
Mr. Jack W. Davis
Mr. Ranney E. Draper
Mr. Daniel J. Epstein
Mr. D. Jay Floyd
Mr. Ron L. Fowler
Mr. Ernest W. Hahn
Mr. Jack F. Grundhoffer
Mr. Peter J. Hall
Mr. Herb G. Klein
Mr. Don M. Koll
Dr. Tom C. Kravis
Mr. Ron Lane
Mr. Carl E. Reichardt
Mr. Harold B. Sadler
Mr. Don F. Sammis
Mr. J. Stacey Sullivan
Mr. Harry L. Summers
Mr. Robert J. Watkins
Mr. James H. West
Mr. Walter J. Zable
/cJ8/75
rt!
.
.
.
SAN DIEGO NATIONAL SPORTS lRAINING FOUNDATION
BOARD OFlRUSTEES
Paul C. Barkley
Nicholas B. Binkley
C. Terry Brown, Vice President
Malin Burnham
Lodwrick M. Cook
Jack W. Davis
Ranney E. Draper
Daniel J. Epstein
Anne L. Evans
D. Jay Flood
Ron L. Fowler
. Richard H. Gordon
Ernest W. Hahn, Vice President
Peter J. Hall
Charlie Jackson
Herb G. Klein
Don M. KolI
Thomas C. Kravis, MD
David B. Kuhn, Jr.
Daniel D. "Ron" Lane
Sol Lizerbram, DO
Gloria D. McColl, President
Edwin Moses
Carl E. Reichardt
Harold G. Sadler
Don F. Sammis
Harvey W. Schiller, PhD
J. Stacey Sullivan, Secretary
Harry L. Summers
Robert J. Watkins
James H. West, Treasurer
Henry S. Williams, MD
Walter J. Zable
/ t-) (J - / b
7~
EXTRACT FROM HINUTES OF PLANNING COr.I1HSSION ['IEETING OF JULY 8,
1992
.
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT:
Chair Fuller, Commissioners Carson,
Casillas, Decker, Hartin and Tuchscher
Chair Fuller announced that there would be a change in the order
of items on the Agenda. Item 3 would be taken second, followed
by Item 2.
3.
PUBLIC HEARING:
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PCC-92-04:
REQUEST TO ESTABLISH OLYMPIC TRAINING
CENTER BOATHOUSE ON WESTERLY SHORE OF
LGlER OTAY LAKE - SAN DIEGO NATIONAL
SPORTS TRAINING FOUNDATION
.
Senior Planner Griffin using the overhead projector pointed out
the sites involved. The site totals 3.7 land acres and .7 water
acres on the westerly shore of Lower Otay Lake and would provide
year-round training of international class Ar,lerican athletes in
canoeing, kayaking and rowing. The project site and the areas
immediately adjacent are presently vacant open space. The Boat-
house facil ity would consist of 13,500 sq. ft. of building area
in three separate structures and 18,000 sq. ft. of deck area. It
would include a 3,000 sq. ft. floating dock and ramp. Access
would be provided off \'/ueste Road. Parking \','ould be located
along the access dr ive to avoid parking lot condi tions. The
buildings would contain storage for canoes, kayaks and boats as
well as showers, lockers and office space.
Training would be provided for about GO athletes on a 2,000 meter
training course. A facilities management plan, parking plan and
mitigation monitoring plan contain such parameters and crite:i~
that minimize conflicts with other activities on the Lake. These
have been made conditions of project approval. A memo, dated
July 8, 1992 was distributed to the Commissioners and provides
the amended conditions of approval for this ite~l. The memo is
directed to the form of the condition3 :..ther than the substance.
Wi th these amended condi ti ons of appr ov al and with the Fi ndi ngs
in the staff report, approval is recomnended.
As an update to the schedule of actions and approvals listed in
the body of the staff report, on July 1, 1992, the Commission
voted unanimously to certify the Final EIR. On Honday, July 6,
the San Diego City Council voted unanimously to certify the EIR
and approve the project lease, CEQA Findings and overrides. The
following item on the Agenua llill be the COffil;]ission consideration
of the CEQA Findings and Statement of Overriding Considerations
provided that the conditional use permit is approved by the
Commission.
.
.
!I-/(]~ '17
'JJ
.
Extract from 7/8/92 Planning Commission Meeting
2
.
.
Commissioner Decker asked for clarification of the status of the
Olympic Training Center or of the Committee itself. He asked if
it was a private organization? Is it exclusive or can anyone
become an Olympian?
Mr. Griffin said he would defer to the applicant.
David Nielsen, Executive Vice President of the San Diego Sports
Training Association, said the answer is yes. Any American
citizen, youngster or athlete can become an Olympian. Skill is
the only discrimination.
Commissioner Casillas said that in the staff report, page 3-35,
there was a statement that USOC has a general policy regarding
community use of the facilities; namely, "...If the City of San
Diego expresses an interest, the USOC is willing to work with the
City to explore providing community use at the boathouse." He
asked why the City of Chula Vista is not mentioned? Mr. Neilsen
replied that the three Cities should be referenced, however, the
reference was to the City of San Diego who, as the owner of the
land and water, would have the right of veto based on that
ownership. San Diego has already attached conditions to the
lease concerning publ ic use and access. In reply to the
Commissioner's inquiry if this would include citizens of Chula
Vista, Mr. Neilsen answered affirmatively.
Commissioner Decker raised the issue of the Mitigation Monitoring
Program and drew attention to the lack of a statement regarding
the responsibility of the OTC to provide some sort of a security
or safety process during meets that are not exclusively for the
use of the OTC. Clarifying his statement, the Commissioner said
he understood that some days would be set aside for the exclusive
use of the OTC. There also may be competitive events of lesser
magnitude on dual-use days on \/hich all the lanes Ilould be used.
Would it not then be the responsibility of the OTC to provide
some sort of interface or safety buffer between the other users
of the Lake at that time? Mr. Neilsen said yes, they would be
responsible for policing and safety of all users of the reservoir
on those days. Commissioner Decker said he had some wording he
would like included in the Mitigation Monitoring Program to cover
that contingency and he would bring them up as a motion.
Commissioner Decker said he was also interested in the use of
exclusive days. The Mitigation Monitoring Program allows OTC the
exclusive use of the area if a certain amount of noti~.cation is
provi<..ed. It W.J ,: c seem that such a stipulation would allow the
OTC an unlimited number of days. It seems it might be \/orthwhile
to set some limit, thereby setting the minds of the other users
of the Lake at ease. Mr. Neilsen said that issue had been
discussed with the San Diego staff and at the various levels of
review. There is language in the lease document (Section 1.5)
.
,
1'/ (3 -?~
11
l
Extract from 7/8/92 Planning Commission Meeting
3
.
which is summarized in the handout given the Commissioners. "The
public reservoir recreation programs shall have priority over the
lessee's activities. The City may require lessee to cease and
desist f rom any acti viti es which the manage r determines to be in
conflict with the public use of the reservoir." In several
sections of the lease there is overriding language that woulo
force the OTC to acknowledge that the priority is the existing
recreational users. OTC has agreed to that language.
Commissioner Decker expressed appreciation saying he had not been
privy to the lease but had seen only the mitigation monitoring
program.
Assistant City Attorney Rudolf said that was the most appropriate
place for that language since the City's jurisdiction ends at the
water and the City of San Diego'G jurisdiction begins at the
water.
.
Commissioner Carson referenced page 3-62 and asked when a devel-
oper is non-compliant, what is the usual resort? Mr. Griffin
said that in his experience in enforcing CUPs, the normal course
of events is to revoke or review the permit. If it is an
imminent threat to public safety, an immediate "cease and desist"
can be invoked. The Commissioner suggested that as everyone
needs money, fines and penalties might be acceptable.
The Commissioner continued that the same paragraph says,
"Decisions regarding actions .....are the responsibility of the
City of Chula Vista." She asked who would be responsible, the
Attorney, the Planning Department, a staff member? llr. Griffin
said the Planning Department in consultation with the City
Attorney's office, and, perhaps, the Building Department would be
involved. Attorney Rudol f said all those agencies would be
involved in the process.
.
On page 3-65, second insert under item 8 says, "If this miti-
gation measure is pursued, funding for the radio station will be
determined at a later date." She asked where the funding would
come from? ASGociate Planner Reid said that was unknown at the
pr esent time.
On page 3-66, third insert under 11 regarding educating the
public. She asked if the rules will be given verbally only or
also in writing? Some people have to see the written word to
comprehend. Ms. Reid replied there are several ways the plan
could be posted. Renting a boat will require a written statement
of rules and will be signed. There is also the public
information system similar to that found in national parks with a
radio broadcast of the rules and regulations. The athletes,
themselves, would be given the rules. Commissioner Carson
responded that if it were not knOlln where the funding for the
radio station would be obtaine~, it woula be important that there
.
)LI(J~71
-;.5
Extract from 7/8/92 Planning Commission Meeting
4
.
be some way that users be verbally informed. She pointed out
that frequently people are so eager to get on with their
activity, that they sign without reading and are often the first
to violate the rules.
Attorney Rudolf commented on the matter of enforcement mentioned
on page 3-62. Until recently there was no provision in the Code
for a procedure for a hearing for revocation of a CUP. That has
now been provided and does have a procedure for imposition of
administrative fines.
This being the time and the place as advertised, the public
hearing was opened.
George Hanson, 12598 Portada Place, San Diego, 92130, said he
wished to reserve the right to bring suit against the City of
Chula Vista on this issue. He objected specifically to the
following items concerning the approval process. (1) Rezoning
the property is completely inappropriate. He challenged (2) the
validity and completeness of the facility's management plan and
(3) the validity of the EIR and had submitted a 9-page document
on that issue. (4) The Disclosure Statement filled out by the
applicant is not responsive to the questions. It is an
incomplete document. lIe challenged (5) the ilitigating llonitoring
process as completely inadequate and (6) the Findings as not
credible. (7) The discussion of posting of rules included where
the funding was coming from. He maintained that the current plan
is to have the City of San Diego pay for this, which is
completely inappropriate. (8) The fact that it will be necessary
to notify Lake users of new rules to be imposed raises the
question of recreational compatibility, an issue that is unfairly
dismissed in the EIR. For all those reasons, he is of the
opinion th~~ the City of Chula Vista is opening itself to Court
challenge.
Mr. Griffin interjected that the position taken that the rezoning
is inappropriate on the property because of what might be allowed
there under that zoning is misleading. Right now, the property
is unzoned and leaving it unzoned would present more of a hazard
that zoning it to A-IOO.
Matt Peterson, 530 B St., #2300, San Diego, 92101, said he was of
the law firm of Peterson and Price and represented the San Diego
National Sports Training Foundation. lIe said they had an
organized presentation with Dave Nielsen, Laurie r'lcKinley and he
would conclude with some brief remarks about the Findings of
Appr ov al.
Mr. David C. Nielsen said planning for the OTC began in 1986.
After two years, Chula Vista was selected as the site for the
4It third Olympic Training Center in the United States.
.
.
/ t/!J -ISO
7~
.
Extract from 7/8/92 Planning Commission Meeting
5
.
.
One of the primary reasons that Chula Vista was chosen was the
opportunity presented to train rowing, canoeing and kayack
athletes at Lower Otay Reservoir. Those sports are among the
least served in the United States. The Boathouse Proposal before
the Commission is the result of more than two years of work with
staff, the Design Review Committee, the City of San Diego Lakes'
Committee, the Facilities Committee and the City of San Diego.
During this time, numerous accommodations have been made to the
concerns raised and are summarized in the handout before the
Commission. Five different designs have been considered.
Significant mitigation measures have been designed into the EIR
and the lease to protect the current recreational users. The
Commission is one of eight hearing bodies through which the
project must pass. To date approval has been received f rom the
City of San Diego Facilities Committee and the Council. The
Lakes' Committee has opposed construction from the very begin-
ning. The EIR has been recommended for certification by the
Resource Conservation Commission and by the Planning Commission
itself. The OTC are confident they will be good neighbors and
will not displace a single current user.
Laurie McKinley, 416 University Ave., San Diego, 92103,
representing the San Diego National Sports Training Foundation
reviewed the five designs that have been proposed for the
Boathouse. The original request from the USOC asked for a 24,000
sq. ft. building. The current design incorporates 13,500 sq. ft.
of building. The first design was a two-story building, 32 feet
high, located on the water's edge. The current site plan is at a
different location, one that has had disturbance in the past, and
is back away from the water eliminating the need for rip-rap at
the deck edge. The deck is located quite a way from the water
and is reached by a 30 ft. wide sand path. This provides minimal
impact to the habitat. The mass of the building has been broken
up into several uses. The smaller building at the top is storage
for canoe/kayak and multi-purpose space. The larger to the
bottom is storage space for rowing, for the shells, and a repair
bay. The center building provides the showers and lockers.
Originally there was loading provided on both sides of the
building, but to soften the effect from Wueste Road, one was
removed reducing the deck's square footage considerably and
increasing the landscaping by approximately 1/2 acre.
The curved wall corning from the top building is reminiscent of
the curved Visitors Bureau on the main site. There is a
trellised entryway between the buildings. It is the same as is
being used throughout the campus. A pyramidal copper roof on the
center building reflects the pyramidal form used on the
residential projects. Building materials ~/(:re changed from
stucco to redwood with only the curved wall remaining as stucco.
.
.
/LI!J~ff'/
??
Extract from 7/8/92 Planning Commission Meeting
6
.
Mr. Peterson referenced the Findings on page 5, saying in
addition to the wording of Finding #1 in the staff report, the
project when approved will also fulfill other economic, social
and other considerations of benefit to Chula Vista. These would
include but not be limited to the creation of construction jobs,
the addition of a Boathouse and Launch Facility allowing for
year-round water sports training in an OTC support e~ironment.
The location of the OTC and proposed Boathouse have been
carefully selected to fulfill the goals and objectives of the OTC
and the City. It is felt that when this facility is operational
it will instill pride in the spirit of the Olympics to the youth
of the Community. In addition to the wording of Finding #2, an
extensive mitigation program has been prepared that is complete
and thorough. Only one impact which was not able to be mitigated
to a level less than significant and that is visual. This would
be the case with any project built along the shoreline. Findings
#3 and #4 are self evident.
.
No one else wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Decker said he would like discuss something in the
Mitigation Monitoring Program which would require modification
before acceptance of the CUP. His motion goes along with the OTC
responsibility of providing on-water safety monitoring during
events in which they are not the sole user of the Lake. This
could be done by a volunteer group such as the Coast Guard
Auxiliary.
The Commissioner said he would submit a motion to add to page 7
of the Mitigation Monitoring Program under Item 6, Special
Events, that it shall be the responsibility of the OTC to provide
on-water safety monitoring vessels if competitive events are
scheduled during dual-use periods.
Commissioner Tuchscher said that any such event would require a
special use permit which would have a provision adequate to cover
that particular issue. Any mitigation would have to be approved
during tHat process and that the suggestion made by Commissioner
Decker is not necessary.
Associate Planner Reid said as a point of clarification that the
CUP and the EIR deal with events where there are up to 100
competitors. In the possibility for 100 competitors, they do
have the option of returning to the Com~ission and asking
consideration of that. Individual environmental analysis would
be required at that particular competition.
Commissioner Decker said a permit was not required for less than
100 people yet for dual use events to provide some form of
control to ensure that their part of the Lake is being utilized.
. It is not the responsibility of the other users of the Lake to
.
J~~/Y~
~
Extract from 7/8/92 Planning Commission 11eeting
7
.
stay out of the race, it is the responsibility for the OTC to
monitor that process so there is no conflict. The Commissioner
said he would like to ask the lessor if there is such a wording
in the lease?
The City Attorney referenced page 3-64 and said the other measure
that is referred to appears to be different from the conditions 4
and 5 of the revised conditions provided by staff tonight.
Condition 4 speaks to special events expected to attract more
than 100 spectators and #5 deals with minor special events
expected to attract less than 100 spectators but more than on-
site parking will accommodate. This item refers to special
events and says that "no special events/competitions of over 100
people shall be allowed at the OTC boathouse or lake under this
approval." It is speaking to the number of participants as
opposed to spectators. First, we need some clarification as what
the motion is directed to with regard to number of participants
or spectators and has the concern al ready .been addressed by
conditions #4 and ~5. Then there is a technical problem since
the last time this was heard, the EIR was certified and adopted
the Mitigation Monitoring Program. He expressed concern about
modifying the program tonight as opposed to dealing with the
conditions of the CUP. He did not feel that it belongs as a
modi fica tion.
.
Mr. Griffin said it would not be too late to include Commissioner
Decker's proposed condition as a condition of approval of the
CUP.
Attorney Rudolf said that is why there is different language in
condition #3 than there was in the staff report. There needs to
be a single document that incorporates the final conditions that
are imposed. All the conditions in the Hitigation Honitoring
Program are also condi tions of approval. 1'7hat is called for is
an updating of the Facilities Plan and the Parking Plan in the
final version.
Commissioner Decker commented that judging by what the City
Attorney says we are in a Catch-22 situation. We still don't
solve the problem that in regattas it is historically the
responsibility of the person putting ont he regatta to provide
any form of saf ety. If we don't have some words that condi ti ons
this, we leave ourselves open for pecuniary liability.
Assistant Planning Director Lee suggested that the City's juris-
diction stops at the water in the terms of the lease agreement,
to add that to the responsibility of the applicant.
Commissioner Tuchscher said maybe the applicant can add some
perspective with regard to the nwnbers.
.
.
/ilj~8';
if
Extract from 7/8/92 Planning Commission 11eeting
8
.
Mr. Neilsen said there is no language in the lease that
specifically says the OTC is responsible to police the events.
It is their intent to do so. If there is any ~Iay the condi tion
can be made, the OTC would gladly comply with it. Perhaps, the
best way would be to express the Commission's concern to San
Diego.
Commissioner Casillas said as a practical matter, the applicant
would want to police, provide the security and do all those
things. If the appl icant clid not want to do that, surely, his
insurer would want it. He said that no detailed or finite
language was needed. The OTC has the ultimate responsibility to
provide the safety, education called for, and that appears to be
adequate. He would not support the motion.
Commissioner Decker said he would withdraw the motion.
MSUC (Martin/Casillas) 6-0 that based on the Findings contained
in Section E of the staff report adopt a motion recommending that
City Council approve PCC-92-04 subject to conditions 1 through 7
as rev ised.
.
Mr. Griffin stated that for the record the concern that Mr.
Hanson brought up about fill ing out the Disclosure form. The
applicant has now amended the forr.1 and checked the box "no". Hr.
Neilsen stated his concurrence.
MSC (Decker/Carson) 5-1, Casillas voting "no", to direct staff to
prepare a letter for the Chair to sign to the City of San Diego
on the appropriateness of some form of on-water safety monitoring
process during competitive events during dual-use events.
.
.
J16~F''1
If)
.
.
.
RESOLUTION NO. PCZ-92-04,
EIR-90-l2
PCC-92-04, AND
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA ADOPT AN ORDINANCE ZONING CERTAIN
DESIGNATED PROPERTY ON THE WESTERLY SHORE OF
LOWER OTAY LAKE AS AGRICULTURAL-lOO AND FINDING
THAT SUCH ZONING ACTIVITY IS EXEMPT FROM THE
REQUIREMENTS OF THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL
QUALITY ACT PERMIT THE USE OF CERTAIN DESIGNATED
PROPERTY AS OLYMPIC TRAINING CENTER BOATHOUSE ON
CERTAIN DESIGNATED CONDITIONS, CERTIFYING THE
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT NO. 90- !2, AND
MAKING CERTAIN CEQA FINDINGS, APPROVING AND
ADOPTING THE MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM AND
STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FOR THE
OLYMPIC TRAINING CENTER BOAT HOUSE.
WHEREAS, property consisting of approximately 100 acres located in the
Ci ty of Chul a Vi sta generally located between Wueste Road and the 480 foot
contour level of the Lower Otay Lake Reservoir bounded on the south by the
territorial boundary of the City of Chula Vista and on the north by a
hypothetical extension of Otay Lakes Road, diagramatically presented on the
small area map attached hereto as Exhibit A, ("Property") is currently not
zoned by the City; and,
WHEREAS, the Property is currently owned by the City of San Diego; and,
WHEREAS, a duly verified appl ication for a zoning action was filed with
the Planning Department of the City of Chula Vista on May 21, 1992, by the
City of Chula Vista; and,
WHEREAS, said application requested the zoning of approximately 100 acres
constituting most of the westerly shore of Lower Otay Lake to A-IOO
(Agricultural Zone, 100-acre minimum parcel size), and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission set the time and place for a hearing on
said zoning application and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose,
was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city
and its mailing to property owners within 1,000 feet of the exterior
boundaries of the property at least ten days prior to the hearing, and
WHEREAS, the hearing by the Planning Commission was held at the time and
place as advertised, namely 7:00 p.m., July 8, 1992, in the Council Chambers,
276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning Commission and said hearing was
thereafter closed, and
WHEREAS, from the facts presented to the Planning Commission, the
Commission has determined that the zoning is consistent with the City of Chula
Vista General Plan and that public necessity, convenience, general welfare and
good zoning practice support the zoning to A-IOO; and,
J'IIJ - g'S
IJr
.
.
.
WHEREAS, the City of San Diego owns the following acreage: approximately
100 acres located in the City of Chula Vista generally located between Wueste
Road and the 480 foot contour level of the lower Otay lake Reservoir bounded
on the south by the territorial boundary of the City of Chula Vista and on the
north by a hypothetical extension of Otay lakes Road, diagrammatically
presented on the small area map attached hereto as Exhi bi t A, ("Property");
and,
WHEREAS, the San Diego National Sports Training Foundation ("Applicant")
has leased a 3.77 acres of land located on the Property from the City of San
Diego for the purposes of building and operating a Olympic Training Center
Boathouse; and,
WHEREAS, our Municipal Code considers, at Section 19.54.010 (m), such
use, to wit: a public or quasi public use, in an A-100 Zone to be an
unclassified use, and at Section 19.20.040, unclassified uses are permitted if
the City issues a conditional use permit specifying conditions on which such
use may be permitted; and,
WHEREAS, a duly verified application ("Application") for a conditional
use permit was fil ed with the Pl anni ng Department of the City of Chula Vi sta
on July 23, 1991, by San Diego National Sports Training Foundation, and,
WHEREAS, the project ("Olympic Training Center Boathouse Project" or
alternatively, "Project") which is the subject matter of the environmental
revi ew herei n referenced is the construct i on and use of an Olympic Tra ini ng
Center Boathouse consisting of three buildings (not including deck) consisting
of a total of 13,496 square foot on a total of 3.1 land acres and 0.07 water
surface acres (for the dock and ramp), all as more fully described in the City
of Chula Vista Final Environmental Impact Report No. 90-12, which description
is incorporated herein by reference; and,
WHEREAS, a draft Environmental Impact Report dated November 1992,
evaluating the proposed Olympic Training Center Boathouse Project was prepared
and was transmitted by the City of Chula Vista, as lead agency, to all
concerned parties for review and comment; and,
WHEREAS, notice of the avail abil ity of the Draft Suppl ementa 1
Environmental Impact Report was given as required by law; and,
WHEREAS, written comments from the public on the Draft Supplemental
Environmental Impact Report were accepted during a 45-day review period; and,
WHEREAS, based on a project change suggested by the Applicant during the
publ ic comment period that a dock be included in the Project which had not
been environmentally addressed, a Recirculated Draft Environmental Impact
Report, dated April 19, 1992 was prepared; and
WHEREAS, the Recirculated Draft Environmental Impact Report, dated April
1992, evaluating the proposed Olympic Training Center Boathouse, was prepared
and was transmitted by the City of Chula Vista to all concerned parties for
review and comment; and,
-2-
/~/(f. --y&
g;;
.
.
.
WHEREAS, Not ice of the Avail abil ity of the Reci rcul ated Draft
Environmental Impact Report was given as required by law; and,
WHEREAS, written comments from the public on the Recirculated Draft
Environmental Impact Report were accepted April 25, 1992 to June 17, 1992; and,
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission held a public hearing and accepted
public testimony on the Recirculated Draft Environmental Impact Report on June
17, 1992; and,
WHEREAS, no State Clearinghouse had no comments, and public comments have
been addressed in the Final Environmental Impact Report for the Olympic
Training Center Boathouse; and,
WHEREAS, notice of the availability of the Final Environmental Impact
Report was given to commentators on the Recirculated Draft Environmental
Impact Report on July 13, 1992; and,
WHEREAS, no written responses to comments on the Final Environmental
Impact Report were received by the lead agency; and,
WHEREAS, the Final Environmental Impact Report was prepared in accordance
with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and its
applicable Guidelines; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission set the time and place for a hearing on
said Appl ication for a conditional use permit and notice of said hearing,
together with its purpose, was given by its publ ication in a newspaper of
general circulation in the city and its mailing to property owners within
1,000 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least ten days prior
to the hearing; and,
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely
7:00 p.m., July 8, 1992, in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before
the Planning Commission and said hearing was thereafter closed; and,
WHEREAS, on July 1, 1992, the Commission certified that the Final
Environmental Impact Report on the project, EIR-90-12, ("FEIR") complied with
CEQA and its guidelines;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City
of Chula Vista does hereby find, determine, resolve and order as follows:
I. The Final Suoolemental Environmental Imoact Reoort.
The Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for the Olympic
Training Center Boathouse consists of:
A. Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (EIR 90-12) SCH
#90010709, dated July 1992, which contains (I) the Recirculated
Draft EIR; (2) Responses to Comments on the Recirculated Draft,
copies of comment letters on the Recirculated Draft, and responses;
and (3) two addenda; and,
-3-
/'i:J-~?
B-3
.
.
.
B. Appendices (A through I) to Environmental Impact Reports for the
Olympic Training Center Boathouse dated April 1992.
II. FEIR Reviewed and Considered.
The Final Environmental Impact Report has been reviewed and considered by
the City Planning Commission of the City of Chula Vista; and
III. Certification.
The Fi na 1 Envi ronmenta 1 Impact Report is hereby cert i fi ed by the City
Planning Commission to have been completed in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act and all applicable guidelines
IV. Grant of Conditional Use Permit.
The City Planning Commission hereby recommends that the City Council
adopt a resolution granting a conditional use permit for the use of the 3.7
acre site as an Olympic Training Center Boathouse subject to the following
conditions:
A. The Project is built and maintained in the manner described in the
FEIR.
B. All of the mitigation measures specified within the Mitigation
Moni tori ng Program for EIR-90- 12 are hereby incorporated as
conditions of approval unless otherwise modified by other conditions
of approval listed herein. Those measures include, but are not
limited to, compliance with all of the project and operational
parameters outlined in the Facilities Management Plan, Boathouse
Parking Plan and other application plans and materials, as modified
by the mitigation measures specified in the Mitigation Monitoring
Program for EIR-90-12.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit, applicant shall generate
and file with both cities, an updated version of the Facilities
Management Plan which incorporates the Mitigation Monitoring Program
changes, adds the Boathouse Parking Plan (as modified by the
Mitigation Monitoring Program) and the following two conditions
regarding "special events."
C. Monitoring of mitigation measures is conducted in the manner
described in the Mitigation Monitoring Program.
D. This conditional use permit shall not become effective until the
zoning of the property becomes effective (ref.: PCZ-92-C).
E.
The project
cond it i ona 11 y
DRC-92-58).
des i gn shall
approved by
plan approved or
Committee {ref.:
comply wi th the
the Design Review
-4-
/ t-/ fj .--d
~'f
.
.
.
F. For proposed special events expected to attract more than tOO
spectators, applicant shall first obtain a separate conditional use
permit, or a "special events permit" if and when Chula Vista adopts
an ordinance providing therefore, and additional environmental
review by the City of Chula Vista.
G. For minor special events (those expected to attract less than 100
spectators but more spectators than on-site parking will
accommodate) personnel shall be posted at the entrance to Boathouse
Road to provide maps and assistance in directing overflow spectators
to parking/shuttle locations on the main OTC campus.
H. This permit shall be subject to any and all new, modified, or
deleted conditions imposed after adoption of this resolution to
advance a legitimate governmental interest related to health, safety
or welfare which City shall impose after advance written notice to
the permittee and after the City has given to the permittee the
right to be heard with regard thereto. However, the City, in
exercising this reserved right/condition, may not impose a
substantial expense or deprive Permittee of a substantial revenue
source which the Permittee cannot, in the normal operation of the
use permitted, be expected to economically recover.
I. This conditional use permit shall become void and ineffective if not
utilized within one year from the effective date thereof, in
accordance with Section 19.14.260 of the Municipal Code. Failure to
comply with any condition of approval shall cause this permit to be
reviewed by the City for additional conditions or revocation.
failing any of which conditions, or failing the continued maintenance of same
as the condition may require, this permit, shall, following a public hearing
by the City Council at which the Appl icant or his successor in interest is
given notice and the opportunity to appear and be heard with regard thereto,
be terminated or modified by the City Council.
V. Non-CEOA Findinqs
1. That the proposed use at the location is necessary or desirable to
provide a service or facility which will contribute to the general
well being of the neighborhood or the community.
The OTC Boathouse is an essent i a 1 component of the Olympic Trai ni ng
Center, and will provide a training facility for international class
athletes in canoeing, kayaking and rowing.
2. That such use wi 11 not under the ci rcumstances of the part i cul ar
case, be detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of
persons residing or working in the vicinity or injurious to property
or improvements in the vicinity.
-5-
JtjlJ~~!
KS
.
.
.
The Facilities Management Plan, Parking Plan, Mitigation Measures outline
in EIR-90-12, and conditions of approval will ensure that the Boathouse
will not have an adverse impact on persons or property in the area.
3. That the proposed use will comply with the regulations and
conditions specified in the code for such use.
Compliance with all applicable codes, conditions and regulations shall be
required prior to the issuance of development permits and on a continuing
basis thereafter.
4. That the granting of this conditionally use permit will not
adversely affect the general plan of the City or the adopted plan of
any government agency.
The proposal is consistent with the General Plan upon the approval of
this conditional use permit.
VI. CEOA Findinas
A. Adoption of Findinas.
The Council does hereby approve and incorporate as if set forth full
herein, and make each and everyone of the CEQA Findings attached hereto.
B. Certain Mitiaation Measures Feasible and Adopted.
As more fully identified and set forth in the previous environmental
documents for this project area and this supplemental environmental
document (EIR-90-I2) and the CEQA Findings for this project which is
hereby attached hereto, Council hereby finds that pursuant to Publ ic
Resources Code Section 21081 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15091, that the
mitigation measures described in the above referenced document are
feasible and will become binding upon the appropriate entity such as the
Applicant, the City, or other special districts which has to implement
these specific mitigation measures.
C. Feasibilitv of Alternatives.
As is also noted in the environmental documents referenced in the
illlllediately preceding paragraph, alternatives to the Project which were
identified as potentially feasible are hereby found not to be feasible.
D. Adoption of Mitiaation Monitorina Proaram.
As required by the Public Resources Code Section 21081.6, it is
recolllllended that City Council adopt the Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program set forth in FEIR to this resolution and incorporated
herein by reference as set forth in full. The City Planning COlllllission
recolllllends that the Council find that the Program is designed to ensure
-6-
J t.-/ IJ /r 0
3d:,
.
.
.'
E.
that during the project implementation and operation, the Applicants
and other responsi bl e parties impl ement the project components and
comply with the feasible mitigation measures identified in the
Findings and in the Program.
Statement of Overridinq Considerations.
Even after the adoption of all feasible mitigation measures, certain
significant or potentially significant environmental affects caused by
the project or cumulatively will remain. Therefore, the City Planning
Commission recommends that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista
issue pursuant to CEQA Guidel ines Section 15093, as set forth, attached
hereto, a Statement of Overriding Considerations identifying the specific
economic, social, and other considerations that render the unavoidable
significant adverse environmental effects still significant but
acceptable.
F. Notice of Determination.
The City Planning Commission recommends that the City Council direct the
City Clerk to post a Notice of Determination and files the same with the
County Clerk.
WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that the
proposal is exempt from environmental review under Sections 15305 (Class 5)
and 15303 (Class 3) of the CEQA Guidel ines (the exemptions are for a minor
alterat i on inland use and permi tt i ng of 1 imited numbers of small structures
respectively).
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT from the facts presented to the
Planning Commission, the Commission has determined that the zoning is
consistent with the City of Chula Vista General Plan and that public
necessity, convenience, general welfare and good zoning practice support the
zoning to A-100.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION recommends that the
the City Council adopt an ordinance to zone the property to A-100 as shown on
Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof.
And that a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the owners of the
property and the City Council.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA,
this day of , by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Commissioners
None
None
Carson, Fuller, Casillas, Decker, Martin and Tuchscher
~,., ~~t1--
Sus n Full er, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Nancy Ripley, Secretary
WPC 0420p
)10--1/
'87
-7-
'-
I
I
.~$~
~~~
. I
I
r (PV'> 1
I
.
--
.
~.;...
,. .
\-
.
"~v--.:/ I
.~..-
".,
-,
. ~
-.-.-
-
~U~e:l-T
A~
../l
)
tftst
Of" .,
~,
oot!
"
.
.
.!$~II-Ib ('ITY :.
if ~f.J DI~c?:.
~~TJft~ ..~.
Ired ..
.~
_~VA1"Ie'N
EXHIBIT A
.....-- -
(.'001 ~ eN ~.sT~I"Y
~ t'f ~R frA'f ~1'-8
1~'(
NnRTII -l'tZ.-1~'"
J" LOCATOR
. %elN1~ tIP ~~i1-lTW
) u~~ ~p fl) ~.IQ::>
. J -/ - .
CAB
RESOLUTION NO. 1<0"'" ~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA PERMITTING THE USE OF CERTAIN DES-
IGNATED PROPERTY AS OLYMPIC TRAINING CENTEF!.
BOATHOUSE ON CERTAIN DESIGNATED CONDITIONS,
CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT NO.
90-12, AND MAKING CERTAIN CEQA FINDINGS, AP-
PROVING AND ADOPTING THE MITIGATION MONITORING
PROGRAM AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERA-
TIONS FOR THE OLYMPIC TRAINING CENTER BOAT
HOUSE.
WHEREAS, the city of San Diego owns the following acreage:
approximately 100 acres located in the City of Chula vista
generally located between Wueste Road and the 480 foot contour
level of the Lower Otay Lake Reservoir bounded on the south by the
territorial boundary of the City of Chula vista and on the north by
a hypothetical extension of Otay Lakes Road, diagrammatically
presented on the small area map attached hereto as Exhibit A,
("Property"); and,
WHEREAS,
("Applicant")
Property from
and operating
the San Diego National Sports Training Foundation
has leased a 3.77 acres of land located on the
the City of San Diego for the purposes of building
a Olympic Training Center Boathouse; and,
WHEREAS, our Municipal Code considers, at section 19.54.010
(m), such use, to wit: a public or quasi public use, in an A-100
Zone to be an unclassified use, and at section 19.20.040,
unclassified uses are permitted if the city issues a conditional
use permit specifying conditions on which such use may be
permitted; and,
WHEREAS, a duly verified application ("Application") for a
conditional use permit was filed with the Planning Department of
the City of Chula vista on July 23, 1991, by San Diego National
sports Training Foundation, and,
WHEREAS, the project ("Olympic Training Center Boathouse
Project" or alternatively, "Project") which is the subject matter
of the environmental review herein referenced is the construction
and use of an Olympic Training Center Boathouse consisting of three
--buildings (not including deck) consisting of a total of 13,496
square foot on a total of 3.1 land acres and 0.07 water surface
acres (for the dock and ramp), all as more fully described in the
city of Chula vista Final Environmental Impact Report No. 90-12,
which description is incorporated herein by reference; and,
boathsr1. wp
July 23, 1992
CUP Reso for Boathouse Use
Page 1
1t1c..-\
WHEREAS, a draft Environmental Impact Report dated November
1992, evaluating the proposed Olympic Training Center Boathouse
Project was prepared and was transmitted by the City of Chula
vista, as lead agency, to all concerned parties for review and
comment; and,
WHEREAS, notice of the availability of the Draft Supplemental
Environmental Impact Report was given as required by law; and,
WHEREAS, written comments from the pUblic on the Draft
Supplemental Environmental Impact Report were accepted during a
45-day review period; and,
WHEREAS, based on a project change suggested by the Applicant
during the public comment period that a dock be included in the
Project which had not been environmentally addressed, a Recircu-
lated Draft Environmental Impact Report, dated April 19, 1992 was
prepared; and
WHEREAS, the Recirculated Draft Environmental Impact Report,
dated April 1992, evaluating the proposed Olympic Training Center
Boathouse, was prepared and was transmitted by the city of Chula
vista to all concerned parties for review and comment; and,
WHEREAS, Notice of the Availability of the Recirculated Draft
Environmental Impact Report was given as required by law; and,
WHEREAS, written comments from the pUblic on the Recirculated
Draft Environmental Impact Report were accepted April 25,1992 to
June 17, 1992; and,
WHEREAS, the City Planning commission held a public hearing
and accepted public testimony on the Recirculated Draft Environ-
mental Impact Report on June 17, 1992; and,
WHEREAS, the State Clearinghouse informed the City that none
of the resource agencies had comments, and public comments have
been addressed in the Final Environmental Impact Report for the
Olympic Training Center Boathouse; and,
WHEREAS, notice of the availability of the Final Environmental
Impact Report was given to commentators on the Recirculated Draft
Environmental Impact Report on July 13, 1992; and,
WHEREAS, no written responses to comments on the Final Envi-
ronmental Impact Report were received by the lead agency; and,
WHEREAS, the Final Environmental Impact Report was prepared in
accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental
Quality Act and its applicable Guidelines; and,
boathsr1.wp
July 23, 1992
CUP Reso for Boathouse Use
Page 2
14C-. - 2-
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission set the time and place for a
hearing on said Application for a conditional use permit and notice
of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its
publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and
its mailing to property owners within 1,000 feet of the exterior
boundaries of the property at least ten days prior to the hearing;
and,
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as adver-
tised, namely 7:00 p.m., July 8, 1992, in the Council Chambers, 276
Fourth Avenue, before the Planning commission and said hearing was
thereafter closed; and,
WHEREAS, on July 1, 1992, the Commission certified that the
Final Environmental Impact Report on the project, EIR-90-12,
("FEIR") complied with CEQA and its guidelines; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission recommended the approval of
said Application on July 8th, 1992 on certain terms and conditions
as contained in their Planning commission Resolution Nos. PCZ-92-C,
PCC-92-C, and EIR-90-12;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city Council of the
City of Chula vista does hereby find, determine, resolve and order
as follows:
I. The Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report.
The Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for the
Olympic Training Center Boathouse consists of:
A. Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (EIR
90-12) SCH #90010709, dated July 28, 1992, which contains
(1) the Recirculated Draft EIR; (2) Responses to Comments
on the Recirculated Draft, copies of comment letters on
the Recirculated Draft, and responses; and (3) two
addenda; and,
B. Appendices (A through I) to Environmental Impact Reports
for the Olympic Training Center Boathouse dated April
1992.
II. FEIR Reviewed and Considered.
The Final Environmental Impact Report has been reviewed and
considered by the city council of the city of Chula Vista; and
III. certification.
The Final Environmental Impact Report is hereby certified by
boathsr1.wp
July 23, 1992
CUP Reso for Boathouse Use
Page 3
I '-t~- ~
the City Council to have been completed in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act and all applicable
guidelines
IV. Grant of Conditional Use Permit.
The City Council hereby grants a conditional use permit for
the use of the 3.7 acre site as an Olympic Training Center
Boathouse subject to the following conditions:
A. The Project is built and maintained in the manner
described in the FEIR.
B. All of the mitigation measures specified within the
Mitigation Monitoring Program for EIR-90-12 are hereby
incorporated as conditions of approval unless otherwise
modified by other conditions of approval listed herein.
Those measures include, but are not limited to, compli-
ance with all of the project and operational parameters
outlined in the Facilities Management Plan, Boathouse
Parking Plan and other application plans and materials,
as modified by the mitigation measures specified in the
Mitigation Monitoring Program for EIR-90-12.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit, applicant
shall generate and file with both cities, an updated
version of the Facilities Management Plan which
incorporates the Mitigation Monitoring Program changes,
adds the Boathouse Parking Plan (as modified by the
Mitigation Monitoring Program) and the following two
conditions regarding "special events."
C. Monitoring of mitigation measures is conducted in the
manner described in the Mitigation Monitoring Program.
D. This conditional use permit shall not become effective
until the zoning of the property becomes effective (ref.:
PCZ-92-C).
E. The project design shall comply with the plan approved or
conditionally approved by the Design Review Committee
(ref.: DRC-92-58).
F. For proposed special events expected to attract more than
100 spectators, applicant shall first obtain a separate
conditional use permit, or a "special events permit" if
and when Chula vista adopts an ordinance providing
therefore, and additional environmental review by the
City of Chula vista.
boathsrl. wp
July 23, 1992
CUP Reso for Boathouse Use
Page 4
\ yc--Lt
G. For minor special events (those expected to attract less
than 100 spectators but more spectators than on-site
parking will accommodate) personnel shall be posted at
the entrance to Boathouse Road to provide maps and
assistance in directing overflow spectators to
parking/shuttle locations on the main OTC campus.
H. This permit shall be subject to any and all new,
modified, or deleted conditions imposed after adoption of
this resolution to advance a legitimate governmental
interest related to health, safety or welfare which city
shall impose after advance written notice to the
permittee and after the City has given to the permittee
the right to be heard with regard thereto. However, the
City, in exercising this reserved right/condition, may
not impose a substantial expense or deprive Permittee of
a substantial revenue source which the Permittee can not,
in the normal operation of the use permitted, be expected
to economically recover.
I. This conditional use permit shall become void and
ineffective if not utilized within one year from the
effective date thereof, in accordance with section
19.14.260 of the Municipal Code. Failure to comply with
any condition of approval shall cause this permit to be
reviewed by the City for additional conditions or
revocation.
failing any of which conditions, or failing the continued
maintenance of same as the condition may require, this permit,
shall, following a public hearing by the city Council at which the
Applicant or his successor in interest is given notice and the
opportunity to appear and be heard with regard thereto, be
terminated or modified by the City Council.
v. Non-CEOA Findinqs
1. That the proposed use at the location is necessary or
desirable to provide a service or facility which will
contribute to the general well being of the neighborhood
or the community.
The OTC Boathouse is an essential component of the Olympic
Training Center, and will provide a training facility for
international class athletes, as well as the community, in
canoeing, kayaking, and rowing.
The approval of the project will result in the following
economic, social, and other considerations which the city of
Chula vista considers beneficial, including, but not limited
boathsrl. wp
July 23, 1992
CUP Reso for Boathouse Use
Page 5
\ ye..- 5
to: (A) the creation of construction job opportunities in an
economy which is currently lacking job opportunities; and (B)
the addition of a boathouse and launch facility which is a
critical integral component of the Olympic Training Center
which will allow for the year-round water sports training in
an overall Olympic training support environment.
The Boathouse would provide the storage, launching, dock and
support facilities for canoeing, kayaking, and rowing sports
associated with the Olympic training objectives. The city
considers a complete Olympic training support facility for
athletes as a method for contributing to the general well
being of the community. Valued role models for the youth of
the City will be provided as the athletes train for Olympic
competition.
The approval of the project will help fulfill the goals and
objectives of the Chula vista General Plan, the City of San
Diego Progress Guide and General Plan, and the City of San
Diego Lakes Master Plan, which all encourage recreational uses
on the lake.
2. That such use will not under the circumstances of the
particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety or
general welfare of persons residing or working in the
vicinity or injurious to property or improvements in the
vicinity.
The conditions as set forth in the Conditional Use Permit, the
Facilities Management Plan, the Parking Plan, and the
Mitigation Measures as outlined in EIR 90-12 and Addendums
thereto, will insure that the Boathouse and its related uses
will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general
welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity or
injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity. A
thorough Environmental Impact Report and Mitigation Monitoring
Program has been prepared to assure that the impacts will be
mitigated as much as possible.
3. That the proposed use will comply with the regulations
and conditions specified in the code for such use.
Pursuant to the conditions of approval of the CUP, as well as
all of the measures identified in Finding 2 above, compliance
with all applicable codes, conditions, and regulations will be
assured prior to the issuance of development permits. In
addition, based upon Facilities Management Plan and the
Mitigation Monitoring Program, compliance with all applicable
codes, conditions, and regulations shall be assured on a
continuing basis thereafter.
boathsrl. wp
July 23, 1992
CUP Reso for Boathouse Use
Page 6
\ Y (!..- Co
4. That the granting of this conditional use permit will not
adversely affect the general plan of the City or the
adopted plan of any government agency.
The granting of this Conditional Use Permit is consistent with
the goals and objectives of the Chula vista General Plan, the
EastLake III General Development Plan, and the Olympic
Training Center sectional Plan Area (SPA Plan). The Olympic
Training Center is listed as a community activity center of
the land use element. In addition, the Olympic Training
Center and accompanying boathouse use is specifically
identified as a planning area and sub-neighborhood contained
within the Eastern Territory of Chula Vista.
The City of Chula Vista General Plan indicates that the
Olympic training activity center is intended to become the
major training center in the nation for Olympic sports (e.g.,
water sports, track and field, etc.). Activities will include
short and long-term training for elite and development level
athletes, seminars, clinics, and conferences, as well as
sports medicine and sports science research.
Because the Boathouse and water sports training is such an
integral part of the overall Olympic Training Center campus,
the Conditional Use Permit for its use will not adversely
affect the General Plan of the City or the adopted plan of any
government agency.
VI. CEOA Findinqs
A. Adoption of Findinqs.
The Council does hereby approve and incorporate as if set
forth full herein, and make each and everyone of the CEQA
Findings attached hereto.
B. certain Mitiqation Measures Feasible and Adopted.
As more fully identified and set forth in the previous
environmental documents for this project area and this
supplemental environmental document (EIR-90-12) and the CEQA
Findings for this project which is hereby attached hereto,
Council hereby finds that pursuant to Public Resources Code
section 21081 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15091, that the
mitigation measures described in the above referenced document
are feasible and will become binding upon the appropriate
enti ty such as the Applicant, the City, or other special
districts which has to implement these specific mitigation
measures.
boathsrl. wp
July 23, 1992
CUP Reso for Boathouse Use
Page 7
ILlc-i
C. Feasibilitv of Alternatives.
As is also noted in the environmental documents referenced in
the immediately preceding paragraph, alternatives to the
Project which were identified as potentially feasible are
hereby found not to be feasible.
D. Adootion of Mitiqation Monitorinq Proqram.
As required by the Public Resources Code Section 21081.6, City
Council hereby adopts the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program set forth in FEIR to this resolution and incorporated
herein by reference as set forth in full. The City Council
recommends that the Council find that the Program is designed
to ensure that during the project implementation and opera-
tion, the Applicants and other responsible parties implement
the project components and comply with the feasible mitigation
measures identified in the Findings and in the Program.
E. Statement of Overridinq Considerations.
Even after the adoption of all feasible mitigation measures,
certain significant or potentially significant environmental
affects caused by the project or cumulatively will remain.
Therefore, the city Council of the city of Chula vista issue
pursuant to CEQA Guidelines section .15093, as set forth,
attached hereto, a Statement of Overriding Considerations
identifying the specific economic, social, and other
considerations that render the unavoidable significant adverse
environmental effects still significant but acceptable.
F. Notice of Determination.
City Council directs the City Clerk to post a Notice of
Determination and files the same with the County Clerk.
Presented by
l to or12
Robert A. Leiter
Director of Planning
ruce M. Boogaa
city Attorney
boathsr1.wp
July 23, 1992
CUP Reso for Boathouse Use
Page 8
IYL-~
1(.\(..
.
EXTRACT FROB ~lINUTES OF PLANNING COrllHSSION HEETING OF JULY 8,
1992
CO~IHISSIONERS PRESENT:
Chair Fuller, Commissioners Carson,
Casillas, Decker, Martin and Tuchscher
2. CONSIDERATION OF CEOA FINDINGS AND OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS
FOR EIR-90-l2 - FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT FOR TIlE OLYMPIC TRAINING CENTER BOATHOUSE
Senior Planner Griffin said that staff has not planned to make a
presentation on this item in vi~~ of the other two items which
had preceded it.
MSUC (Casillas/Carson) 6-0 to adopt and recommend that the City
Council adopt the attached CEOA Findings and Statement of
Overriding Considerations.
.
.
,
) '-Ie -1
I
.
.
.
.
MINUTES OF A SPECIAL BUSINESS MEETING
OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
5:00 p.m.
Monday, 1uly 1, 1992
Council Chambers
Public Services Building
ROLL CALL
COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Chair FulJer, Commissioners Carson, Casillas, and
Tuchscher
COMMISSIONERS ABSENT: Commissioners Decker and Martin (excused)
STAFF PRESENT: Assistant Planning Director Lee, Associate Planner
Reid, Assistant City Attorney Rudolf
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE - SILENT PRAYER
The pledge of allegiance to the flag was led by Chair FulJer and was folJowed by a moment of
silent prayer.
INTRODUCTORY REMARKS
Chair FulJer dispensed with the introductory remarks.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - Meeting of June 17, 1992
The minutes were not approved, since a quorum of those who had attended the meeting was not
present.
MSUC (Tucbscber/Carson) 4-0 to excuse Commissioner Martin because of business
conflicts.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - None
ITEM I:
CERTDnCATIONOFnNALENVIRONMENTAL~ACTREPORTFOR
THE OLYMPIC TRAINING CENTER BOATHOUSE (EIR-90-12)
Associate Planner Reid recommended that the Planning Commission certify the EIR has been
prepared in compliance with CEQA, the State EIR Guidelines, and environmental procedures
of Chula Vista and that the Planning Commission certify the Final EIR and Mitigation
Monitoring Program.
.
IL/C-/O
.{
.
.
PC Minutes
-2-
July I, 1992
Commissioner Casillas commented that he had asked for a simulation of what the boathouse
would look like from the lake; however, he had taken a canoe and gone out on the lake himself.
He commented how beautiful it was, and that it should be preserved.
Commissioner Tuchscher stated he was not present at the previous meeting in discussion of this
EIR, but had read the materials and was prepared to vote.
Chair Fuller said she was impressed with the Final Supplemental Environmental Report which
contained all the responses to the letters and the comments received at the last meeting. For the
record, she commended staff for the responses to the very lengthy and repetitive letter from
George Hansen of City Lakes Committee. Staff did a fine job in answering his questions.
MSUC (Carson/Casillas) 4-0 (Commissioners Decker and Martin absent) that the EIR has
been prepared in compliance with tbe California Environmental Quality Act, tbe State EIR
Guidelines, and tbe environmental review procedures of the City of Cbula Vista, and the
PIann1n& Comml""lon certifies the Fmal EIR and the Miti&ation Monitorin& Pro&ram.
Associate Planner Reid stated this item would come back to the Planning Commission on July
8 for consideration of the CEQA Findings, the Overriding Considerations, and the project itself
with a rezoning.
. DIRECTOR'S REPORT
Assistant Planning Director Lee stated an updated long-range calendar for the next four months
would be given to the Commission at the next meeting. If there are vacation schedules coming
up, it would be helpful in looking at long-range schedules.
He noted that consideration of a new Chair and Vice Chair would be on the next agenda, along
with appointing a representative to the Interjurisdictional Task Force for the Otay Ranch.
Commissioner Carson asked about the joint meeting with GMOC. Assistant Director Lee noted
that he would discuss it with Planning Director Leiter.
COMMISSION COMMENTS - None
ADJOURNMENT at 5:13 p.m. to the Regular Business Meeting of July 8, 1992, at 5:00 p.m.
in the Council Chambers.
.
rl::~;Jy,~
Planning Commission
(po7.I.-Io)
.
I'IC-/ /
--..;3
.
.
.
MINUTES OF A SCHEDULED SPECIAL MEETING
Resource Conservation Commission
Chula Vista, California
6:00 p.m.
Monday, May 18, 1992
Conference Room 1
Public Services Building
CALL MEETING TO ORDER/ROLL CALL: Meeting was called to order et 6:14 p.m. by
Chairperson Hall with a quorum. City Staff Environmental Review Coordinator Doug Reid
called roll. Present: Commissioners Fox, Ray end Ghougassian. Absent: Johnson, Kracha.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: There was no quorum present to epprove the minutes of April 20
end May 11, 1992. Continued to next meeting.
1.
Draft EIR-92-01 Eastlake I SPA Plan Amendment: Marilyn ponseggi, Consultant, Katie
Wright of Eastlake Development and Marti Borg of Lettiere-Mcintyre Associates
eddressed the issues of significant and unmitigated impacts as they related to traffic,
eir quality and housing. With the building of the 125 freeway, the last phase of the
hospital parking facility will decrease the LOS of the traffic in that immediate area.
Hall stated the parking garage is probably the best mitigation for noise on the hospital.
With this plan amendment, there will be 405 dwelling units lost. It was suggested by
Hall to have council consider low cost and other housing be included somewhere
within the project. After questions of the Commission were answered, it was then
MSUP (Fox/Ray) to recommend Planning Commission certify the EIR; 4-0.
2. Bud Gray discussed the Eastlake Air Quality Improvement Plan and Water Conservation
Plan. Hall questioned the use of express transportation service to the project site. The
current plan is for a trolley route through Otay Ranch which could also service this
area. Ghougassian asked about gray water/reclamation. A representative from Syntax
Associates discussed the creation of a mini treatment plant for recycled bath and/or
toilet water to water lawns, etc., however, stated it is a violation of health standards.
Vance Furukawa, Kaiser representative, discussed the alternate fuel for fleet service
and electrical vehicles. After discussions, it was then MSUP (Fox/Ray) to accept the
Air Quality Improvement Plan and Water Conservation Plan, with the request that
minimal guidelines by the city be established for future developers; 4-0.
3. Draft EIR-90-12, Olympic Training Center Boathouse. Lori McKinley, Consultant to the
Foundation, Dave Neilson, San Diego Sports Training, and Julie McColl, discussed the
issues on the EIR. It is noted that the land is owned by City of Sen Diego, however
its jurisdiction is under the City of Chula Vista for land use. The only mitigation was
to reduce the height of the main building to 14 feet. The other impacts would not be
mitigated to below a level of significance. It was MSUP tGhougassian/Foxl to
recommend to certify the draft EIR. John Ray noted that this was a good project for
the City of Chula Vista.
4.
Negative Declaration 15-92-30 Victory Homes of San Diego. No quorum available for
discussion, as Ghougassian has a conflict of interest in this project.
/'-/c-/;2..
f-
.
.
.
Resource Conservation Commission
Page 2
[Item 6, California Custom, Terry Collier, was taken ahead of Item 5 of the agenda].
5.
Negative Declaration IS-92-36, California Custom. Terry Collier was present to answer
questions on the paint booth to be located inside the cement building within the place
of business. Other mitigation measures have been met. It wes MSUP (Fox/Hall) to
recommend adoption of the negative declaration; 4-0.
6.
Negative Declaration IS-92-31, Messer Apartment complex. Discussion included the
density of the complex and lack of play area. It was MSUP (Fox/Ghougassian) to
recommend acceptance of the mitigated negative declaration; (4-0). A second motion
was made (Hall/Ray) to recommend proviSions for a play area for the children in the
apartment complex; (4-0).
7.
Negative Declaration IS-92-17, Vogue Theater - previously reviewed by RCC.
8.
Mitigated Negative Declaration of IS-92-35, Brauchla Tentative Parcel Map. It was
moved and seconded (Ghougassian/Fox) to recommend approval of the negative
declaration; 3-1, no: Ray). Ray retracted his no vote; the same motion was again
voted upon and unanimously passed 4-0.
Ray requested an additional statement be included with this motion. On negative
declarations or EIR's on all projects where there is a stated impact (to schools, traffic,
water, sewage, infrastructure, overcrowding, etc.) that affects the environment or
cumulative impact within the city, that they not be considered mitigated just because
a fee or tax was paid. The impacts and problems should be addressed directly as well
as financially.
STAFF REPORT: Doug Reid handed out an updated budget for information only.
CHAIRMAN'S COMMENTS: Barbara Hall wrote letter to Jackie McOuade thanking her for her
service with the RCC.
COMMISSIONER COMMENTS: Ghougassian commented that there are many tire skid marks
on the streets at 2nd and Las Flores, and also at "E" Street. Told to contact Public Works.
ADJOURNMENT: The meeting was adjourned by Chairperson Hall at 8:50 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
EXPRESS SECRETARIAL SERVICES
~v... ~/41..-
I
Barbara Taylor
/L/c ~ /:;
--S
.
.
.
CANDIDATE FINDINGS AND STATEMENT
OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS
FOR OLYMPIC TRAINING CENTER BOATHOUSE
RECIRCULATED DRAFT SUPPLEMENTAL EIR
(SEIR 90-12) AND ADDENDUMS
1.
INTRODUCTION
Section 21081 of the California Environmental 'Quality Act
(CEQA) requires that no project shall be approved by a public
agency when significant environmental effects have been identified,
unless one of the following findings is made and supported by
substantial evidence in the record:
a)
Changes or alterations have been required in or
incorporated into the project which avoid or
substantially lessen the significant environmental effect
as identified in the Final Environmental Impact Report
(EIR) .
b)
Changes or alterations are the responsibility of another
public agency and not the agency making the finding.
c)
Specific economic, social, or other considerations make
infeasible the mitigation measures or project
alternatives identified in the Final EIR.
CEQA further requires that, where the decision of the public
agency allows the occurrence of significant effects which are
identified in the Final EIR, but are not at least substantially
mitigated, the agency shall state in writing the specific reasons
to support its action based on the Final EIR and/or other
information in the record (Section 15093 of the CEQA GUidelines).
The following Findings are made relative to the conclusions of
the Final Supplemental EIR 90-12 ("SEIR 90-12"), including the
- 1 -
/t/c -- IL!
,
... Addendums thereto, for the proposed Olympic Training Center
Boathouse (SCH #90010709) and all documents, maps, and
illustrations listed in Section IX of these Findings. The
project's discretionary action consists of approval of the
Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for the OTC Boathouse by the City of
Chula Vista and a real property lease'agreement between the City of
San Diego and the San Diego National Sports Training Foundation
(Foundation).
The following Findings and Statement of Overriding
Considerations have been submitted by the project applicant as
candidate findings to be made by the decisionmaking body. The
Environmental Analysis Section of the Development and Environmental
Planning Division recommends that the Decisionmaker(s) adopt these
Findings. They are attached to allow readers of this report an
opportunity to review the applicant's position on this matter.
... The following Findings are made by the City of Chula Vista and
the City of San Diego, collectively, the Decisionmakers, relative
to the conclusions of the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact
Report (SEIR 90-12) and Addenduffis for the Olympic Training Center
Boathouse project located in the City of Chula Vista.
Proiect Description
The site encompasses a total of approximately 3.7 land acres
and approximately 0.07 water surface acres (for the dock and ramp).
The site is located on the western shore of Otay Reservoir,
directly east of Wueste Road. The proposed boathouse facility is
designed to be integrated into and connect to the main OTC site and
facilities to the west.
The facility is proposed as a single-story approximately
13,496 square foot facility which will consist of three separate
4It buildings. The majority of roof lines are flat and approximately
- 2 -
J1--/C - /5'
7
... 14 feet in height (the minimum height requirement for boat
storage) . A copper, pyramidal roof will provide architectural
relief and relate the boathouse to the design elements at the
adjacent OTC. The peak of the copper roof will reach approximately
25 feet 6 inches. The Olympic Training Center Boathouse facility
will consist of the following components:
Component
Approximate
Size (square feet)
Boathouse
. Boat/Canoe/Kayak Storage
. Repair Shop
. Equipment & Storage
. Lockers & Showers
. Offices
. Mechanical Room
. Corridor/Circulation
5,600
2,000
2,485
2,646
450
315
o
Subtotal
13,496
.
Dock
Parking Lot
Deck
Observation Area
3,000
8,512
18,185
27,664
II. FINDINGS
The following Findings are applicable to the project as
analyzed in the SEIR and to the refinement as presented and
analyzed in the Addendums bound within the Final SEIR. The
Findings have been prepared pursuant to Section 15091 of the CEQA
Guidelines and Section 21081 of the California Public Resources
Code.
a)
The Decisionmakers, having reviewed and considered the
information contained in the record and the Final SEIR
for the Olympic Training Center Boathouse find that
changes have been incorporated into the project which
mitigate, avoid, or reduce the level of identified
.
- 3 -
/t/c - J?
8
.
.
.
impacts to insignificance or to levels acceptable to the
City.
b) The Decisionmakers have determined that any remaining
significant effects on the environment found to be
unavoidable are acceptable due to overriding
considerations.
c) The Decisionmakers, having reviewed and considered the
information contained in the Final SEIR and the record,
find that none of the significant environmental effects
anticipated as a result of the proposed project are
within the responsibility of another public agency except
for water quality.
d)
The Decisionmakers, having reviewed and considered the
information contained in the Final SEIR and the record,
find that specific economic, social, or other
considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures
identified in the Final SEIR.
e)
Tr.~
reviewed,
the record.
Decisionmakers
have
independently
Final SEIR and
considered and evaluated the
On the basis of that review, the Decisionmakers find that
the Final SEIR reflects their exercise of independent
judgment over the environmental analysis contained in the
Final SEIR pursuant to Public Resources Code Section
21082.1. The Decisionmakers' Findings and Statement of
Overriding Considerations are supported by documents and
other substantial evidence contained within the record.
The City of Chula Vista's Threshold/Standards, first adopted
November 17, 1987, were developed to assure that the quality of
life enjoyed by the City's residents is maintained while growth
occurs. The Standards have since been amended and adopted as part
- 4 -
lIe-I?
<=f
~ of the City's Growth Management Ordinance. That quality of life is
also important to those who wish to develop wi thin the City.
Implementation of the Threshold/Standards program assures that
significant, adverse impacts are avoided or reduced through sound
planning and that public services and the quality of the
environment will be preserved and enhanced. Based on these
Threshold/Standards, changes have been incorporated into the
project to mitigate or avoid environmental effects. The 11 issues
addressed in the Threshold/Standards are discussed in Sections III
and IV below.
III. SIGNIFICANT, UNMITIGABLE IMPACTS/IMPACTS FOUND INFEASIBLE TO
MITIGATE TO BELOW A LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE
A. Aesthetics and Visual Resources
Impact
.
Project-specific visual impacts from public viewsheds (from
Lower Otay Reservoir, Otay Lakes Road and Wueste Road) are
considered significant and unmitigable. On a cumulative basis, the
project will contribute to the significant and unavoidable
cumulative aesthetic impact on ongoing development on the area's
natural viewshed.
Mitiqation Measures
.
Final Landscape Plans for the project, including
revegetation areas, shall incorporate species of a type
and size (especially height) acceptable to the City
Landscape Architect and City Planning Department.
Further, the City shall provide the City of San Diego the
opportunity to review and comment on the plans prior to
final approval by the City of Chula Vista. This review
and input is intended to facilitate the blending of the
.
- 5 -
/t(C-j?:'
10
.
.
.
project's landscaping with nearby City of San Diego
recreational areas.
· The USOC, or other entity acceptable to the City, shall
be responsible for the monitoring of health and growth of
the site's landscaped areas and revegetation areas for a
period acceptable to the project biologist (refer to
Section 3.6 of the SEIR, Biology). This monitoring is
required to ensure the survival of native species and
revegetation areas. The moni toring shall be incorporated
into the overall mitigation monitoring program for the
project (Public Resources Code S 21081.6).
Findinq
As discussed in the Addendums (contained in the SEIR) and in
response to comments received, the facility was redesigned and the
building height was lowered from 29 feet (as analyzed in the SEIR)
to approximately 14 feet (except for the copper roof which peaks at
approximately 25'6"). The redesign reduced the visual impacts, but
not to a level below significance. It is infeasible to mitigate
the project's contributions to the cumulative impact to regional
visual resources to below a level of significance. Only the "No
Project" al ternati ve would avoid this impact. Section VI II of this
document contains the Statement of Overriding Considerations
(pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15093) which indicates that
the Decisionmakers conclude that the benefits of the project
outweigh its unmitigated adverse environmental effects.
- 6 -
/t/c -/7
II
~ IV. SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS THAT WILL BE MITIGATED TO A LEVEL BELOW
SIGNIFICANT
A. Recreational Use Compatibility
Impact
Potential recreational use incompatibility
result between the proposed OTC Boathouse activities
users.
impacts could
and other lake
Mitiqation Measures
Fishinq:
a)
.
b)
.
During fishing season days (Wednesday, Saturday and
Sunday, mid-January through mid-October) OTC boats will
not have exclusive rights to use of the OTC time trials
course of up to eight lanes (identified in Figure 2-7 of
the SEIR). The OTC boats will have exclusive use of the
OTC training course (three lanes) on those days. This
rule shall be included in the Facilities Management Plan
(FMP). Further, this rule shall be monitored and its
effectiveness included in the Quarterly Management
Reports (QMRs) required below.
Boat course crossings: In the event motorized fishing
boats warrant crossing the path of a rowing scull/boat
underway, the crossing shall occur either in back of
(after) the rowers, or a minimum of 100 meters ("no wake"
crossing) in front of the rowers. Because the rowers go
"backwards" and are more difficult to turn, this should
avoid crossing conflicts. This regulations should be
posted at the City boat launch facility and communicated
to the public as recommended below under "Public
- 7 -
Ire -20
Ie;
.
.
.
Education" Measure h).
c)
Fishing tournaments: OTC training activities shall
either be prohibited or restricted on permitted fishing
tournament days (occasional Saturdays during fishing
season; permitted through the City of San Diego Water
Utilities Department (WUD)). This regulation shall be
specifically addressed in the Facilities Management Plan
to the satisfaction of the WUD, and should be monitored
and included in the Quarterly Management Reports to
determine if adjustments become necessary. The OTC shall
be notified of dates of permitted fishing tournaments no
later than two months prior to the tournament date.
d)
During the fishing season on Lower Otay Reservoir
(approximately mid-January through mid-October), shells,
canoes and kayaks will be required to restrict activities
on the three days per week when fishing is allowed
(Wednesday, Saturday and Sunday). The OTC boats will
remain ISO feet from the Reservoir shoreline on all
fishing days, except in the area delineated in Figure 3-4
of the Draft SEIR, in order to avoid conflict with
shoreline fishing activities. The feasibility of the
lSD-buffer shall be monitored in conjunction with lake-
level monitoring (Measure i) below).
Waterfowl Huntinq:
e)
During the months of the waterfowl hunting season
(approximately mid-October through mid-January) rowing
and paddling will be prohibited during the hunting hours
of dawn to noon on the two days per week that hunting is
allowed at Lower Otay Reservoir (Wednesday and Saturday) .
In addition, at all times during this season -- in order
to provide continuous resting area for waterfowl
- 8 -
;t(C-c2 J
/3
.
shells, canoes, and kayaks will be restricted from
activity in the Harvey ARM of the Reservoir (Figure 3-3
of the Draft SEIR, Prohibited Use Area/Waterfowl Hunting
Season) .
Other Measures:
.
g)
h)
.
f) Special events: No special events/ competitions of over
100 people shall be allowed at the OTC boathouse or lake
under this approval. This restriction shall not include
typical training competition between OTC training
athletes included in the OTC program (provided that no
more than 100 spectators attend). Said provisions shall
be included in the Facilities Management Plan. Any
future requests for competitions shall be subject to CEQA
review and review by the Cities of Chula Vista and San
Diego.
Athletes and OTC employee education: During orientation
of athletes and employees to the boathouse, the lake's
public uses and schedules shall be fully described. Lake
rules and regulations and public use schedules shall be
posted in written form at the boathouse, and shall be
included in the overall training program of the athletes.
Said provisions shall be included in the Facilities
Management Plan, and adherence to rules should be
monitored in the Quarterly Management Reports.
Public education: In order to educate the public of the
OTC lake activities and thus minimize use conflicts, the
following items are recommended. These items should be
in place prior to OTC boathouse occupancy, and should be
monitored in the Quarterly Management Reports.
- 9 -
/t!C -J-:J-
/L(
.
.
An information sign at the lake turn-off at Wueste
Road/Otay Lakes Road shall be posted, identifying
the OTC facilities and a radio channel from which
lake use information can be derived.
· The radio channel shall inform listeners of the OTC
activities (i.e., training times, rules of the
lake), public use information (i. e., open days,
tournaments, lake conditions), ecological
sensitivity of the area and associated protection
rules, and lake use rules which must be reviewed
prior to boat launching or ticket purchase. If
this mitigation measure is pursued, funding for the
radio station will be determined at a later date.
. At the City boat launch, prior to purchase of
tickets or boat launching, the lake user should be
. required to read and acknowledge the rules of the
lake. It is recommended that this will be the
responsibility of the City of San Diego WUD.
i) Lake levels: Lake level data shall be included in each
Quarterly Management Report (derived from the WUD), to
provide for ongoing monitoring of the lake surface area
avai lable for use. Should lake levels show signs of
continued decline, the matter should be raised with the
Users 0 Council and OTC, to determine potential
refinements to lake use regulations. This monitoring and
potential resulting actions should guarantee equitable
shared use of the lake. Lake fluctuations and potential
adjustments in OTC training areas should be identified in
the Facilities Management Plan, acknowledging that the
lake is for both public and OTC uses.
.
- 10 -
11C-:LJ
IS
.
j)
Navy Rescue Training: The USOC/OTC shall meet with the
Navy to determine an equitable shared use of the lake.
It may be that notification by the Navy to the OTC of
future days and locations of practice rescue will be
adequate to reduce potential conflict. This agreement
shall be included in the Facilities Management Plan prior
to issuance of building permits. The effectiveness of
the agreement shall be included in the Quarterly
Management Reports, as necessary.
k) Facilities Management Plan (FMP): Prior to the issuance
of building permits, the FMP shall be revised to include
the above mitigation items. In addition, the following
items are recommended to be added to the FMP:
. Dock operations and OTC boat launching operations
should be described. Provisions to minimize
.
impacts to the surrounding
while launching) should be
operations plan.
ecology (especially
specified in the
. OTC motor boats (coach launches) should be
quantified (estimated no more than 4 boats).
Provisions for launching (at the City launch site);
storage (at OTC docks, and when to be out of the
lake); fueling and repair should ,be delineated in
the FMP. Fueling shall be conducted using the
"pop-on/off" tanks, which ""ould be stored at the
OTC main site and brought to the boathouse when
necessary. Only minor repairs should be conducted
at the boathouse.
.
Athletes, employees and visitors shall be educated
regarding the lake rules and, importantly, the
sensitivity of the adjacent ecology of the area.
.
- 11 -
1~/L-~1 /6
.
.
.
Parking shall be by permit only, and to load/off-
load boats. Signs shall further be posted, subject
to the review of the City of .Chula Vista, at
locations along the lake (to be determined), to
provide for public education and protection of
sensitive habitat. Maps shall be posted at the OTC
site which identify protected and/or prohibited
areas. Walkways and trails shall be clearly marked
(refer also to Biology mitigation, Section 3.6).
.
The OTC shall notify the WUD of any OTC event
requiring exclusive use of the course two months
prior to the event.
1)
Quarterly Management Reports (QMRs): The USOC/OTC shall
be responsible for preparation of the QMRs. Information
to be recorded includes but is not limited to: daily use
of the boathouse facility including number and types of
boats used and schedules, any boat crossing conflicts,
number of athletes each day, visitors, etc. The
USOC/OTC, WUD, and Lakes Committee or User' s Council
shall work together to develop the scope, format,
schedule and review/comment system of the QMRs. These
three entities shall comprise the QMR "review committee."
Items included in the mitigation measures above
shall also be incorporated into the QMR system. Future
additional desired lake uses which may be requested
should also be considered by the review committee and
reported in the QMRs.
Further, to obtain input as to the effectiveness of
ongoing lake operations, comment forms shall be provided
to the OTC coaches, athletes and site manager, and to the
City of San Diego boat launch facility for input from the
- 12 -
JLlC -;2~ 17
.
public (forms could be provided at the time of ticket
purchase, and filled out as desired by lake users). The
results of these comment forms shall be incorporated into
each QMR and reviewed/considered by the three reviewing
entities, or review committee (OTC, City of San Diego and
User's Council).
Findinq
All potentially significant recreational use compatibility
impacts will be eliminated or reduced to a level below significance
by virtue of the mitigation measures.
B. Geoloqy and Soils
Impact
. Available geologic data suggests that there are no significant
geologic and soils constraints on the subject site that would
preclude development and no unmitigable significant impacts are
anticipated. .
Mitiqation Measures
Geoloqy
The following mitigation measures will reduce geologic
on the project site to below a level of significance.
mitigations specifically address possible lithologic and
impacts.
impacts
These
seismic
.
Clayey expansive
Formation will be
feet of subgrade
damaged foundations
portions of the Sweetwater
excluded from the upper three
to reduce the potential for
(ICG Inc. 1990).
.
- 13 -
;ie ~c1~
/'t
.
.
.
.
Buildings and structures designed as specified by
the Uniform Building Code in regards to the
possible earthquake intensities will minimize the
potential for damage. Stucco walks and C-type
masonry should be avoided if possible (see Table 3-
5 in the Draft SEIR).
Soils
The following mitigation measures will reduce impacts related
to specific soil characteristics to below a level of significance.
. Problems due to expansive soils will be compensated
by < selective grading and specially designed
foundations as set forth in the Uniform Building
Code.
.
Erosional rates will be minimized through erosional
control measures such as maintaining vegetative
cover and vegetated buffer zones.
Findinq
All project-specific significant impacts will be eliminated or
reduced to a level below significant by virtue of the mitigation
measures.
C. Hydroloqy!Water Quality
Impact
With development of the project site, the area covered by the
boathouse building and adjacent concrete deck (total area
approximately 40,820 sq. ft.) will be rendered impervious to water.
As a result, rainfall infiltration into soil in this area will be
- 14 -
)fC-,;2 7 /r
.
.
.
impeded and overland flow would take place readily over the
relatively smooth impermeable surfaces. Grading and utility plans
for the proposed boathouse facility include provisions for a
drainage system which will divert runoff to a "soakaway basin"
where storm water will be filtered to remove particulate matter and
dissolved chemicals prior to discharge into Otay Reservoir. The
Soakaway Basin Conceptual Design Report is contained in Appendix G
of the Draft SEIR.
The access road and parking area for the proposed facility
will be surfaced with decomposed granite to allow for unimpeded
infiltration of storm water. Proper design and construction of
these areas will reduce impacts due to increased runoff to below a
level of significance.
The primary water quality issue of the proposed project
involves the possible discharge of urban runoff contaminants from
the parking lot, drives and other surfaces into the Otay Lakes
Reservoir. Proper design and use of measures described in Surface
Drainage will reduce impacts due to urban runoff contaminants to a
level below significance.
Development of the project sites would not affect local or
regional groundwater conditions in the project site vicinity.
There are no wells extracting groundwater from the site at the
present time and groundwater has not been proposed as a source of
water supply in surrounding developments. I f a permanent water
table does exist beneath the site, it is likely more than 100 feet
below the ground surface (CDWR 1967) and would be unaffected by
this development. The project site is not an important recharge
watershed area for any local aquifers (CDWR 1967) and, therefore,
site development would not affect regional groundwater levels.
- 15 -
/ ,-/C-;l15
aD
.
.
.
Mitiqation Measures
The following measures are presented to mitigate potential
drainage problems associated with development of the site:
.
Specific project plans will
and approval of the City
cooperation with the City of
be subject to review
of Chula Vista in
San Diego.
. A preliminary grading and utility plan was included
as part of the Soakaway Basin Conceptual Design
Report. Final design plan submittals shall be
consistent with the conceptual plans and approved
by Cities of Chula Vista and San Diego and the
County Health Department prior to issuance of a
final grading permit.
.
Pad drainage shall be designed to collect and
direct surface water away from proposed structures
to approved drainage facilities. For lawn and
parking areas, a minimum gradient of two percent
shall be maintained and drainage shall be directed
.
toward approved swales or drainage facilities.
Drainage patterns approved at the time of final
grading should be maintained throughout the life of
proposed structures.
.
Runoff from roof and concrete deck surfaces shall
be diverted to the soakaway basin as described in
Surface Drainage Impacts and the Soakaway Basin
Conceptual Design Report (Appendix G of SEIR 90-
12). Final improvement plans shall be consistent
with the conceptual document and approved by the
Cities of Chula Vista and San Diego and the County
Health Department prior to issuance of a grading
- 16 -
JiC-;21
~I
.
.
.
permit. Issuance of the grading permit shall also
be contingent upon the establishment of a
maintenance agreement between the City of San Diego
and the USOC for the soakaway (including provisions
for soil and piping replacement, etc.), or waiver
of such agreement by the City.
.
Erosional Control: Slopes shall be planted with
appropriate drought-resistant vegetation as
recommended by a landscape architect immediately
following grading. Slopes should not be over-
irrigated as heavy groundcover combined with over-
watering is a primary source of surficial slope
failures. Timer-controlled irrigation should be
altered during the rainy season.
.
Maintenance of Drainage Devices: Graded berms,
swales, area drains, and slopes are designed to
carry surface water from pad areas and shall not be
blocked or destroyed. Water will not be allowed to
pond in paid areas, or over top and flow down
graded or natural slopes.
. Erosion potential during the construction phase of
the project shall be controlled through the proper
use of erosional control measures, the maintenance
of vegetative buffers and timely planning of
inundation to avoid peak rainy seasons.
.
Development of the subject project and the EastLake
III project, in general, must comply with all
applicable regulations established by the United
States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as set
forth in the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements for
- 17 -
lie ~J 0
';;;J
.
.
.
urban runoff and storm water discharge.
.
Specific project plans for surface drainage into
Otay Lakes shall be subject to review and approval
by the City of Chula Vista, the RWQCB and the
County Health Department. At that time, the
project applicant may be required to divert all
surface runoff from the site away from the
reservoir.
· Sources of uncontrolled water, such as leaky water
pipes or drains shall be immediately repaired if
identified.
.
Erosion control devices discussed previously would
significantly reduce the sediment load in the
runoff waters. Devices constructed to drain and
protect slopes, including brow ditches, berms,
retention basins, terrace drains (if utilized) and
down drains shall be maintained regularly, and in
particular, shall not be allowed to clog so that
water can flow unchecked over slope faces.
.
Implementation of the soakaway basin as described
in Surface Drainage will reduce impacts due to
urban runoff contamination to a level below
significance.
Findinq
All significant impacts will be eliminated or reduced to a
level below significant by virtue of mitigation measures delineated
above.
- 18 -
;'-I(-:J /
~3
.
.
.
D.
Bioloqical Resources
Impact
Construction of the training facilities at this site would
result in impacts to approximately 3.7 acres of Diegan coastal sage
scrub and approximately 0.1 acre of wetland that is primarily
freshwater marsh. Approximately 0.4 acre of the sage scrub impacts
occur in high quality, undisturbed Diegan coastal sage scrub. The
impacts to Diegan coastal sage scrub are considered significant
because of the regional sensitivity of this habitat and because it
supports sensi ti ve plant and animal species. 'Phe impacts to
wetland habitats (freshwater marsh and riparian scrub) are
considered significant because of their high biological value and
protected status at the federal, state, and local levels. Impacts
to wetland habitats may require a California Department of Fish and
Game Streambed Alteration Agreement and a Nationwide 404 permit
from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.
Indirect impacts as a result of the construction of the
facility at this site could include erosion and sliding of
materials into wetland habitats. Any movement of material into
wetland habitats would be considered a significant adverse impact.
Indirect impacts to California gnatcatchers as a result of
increased human access and activity on this site is considered
potentially significant. These potentially significant impacts can
be mitigated to below a level of significance by reducing human
access to the coastal sage scrub areas on the project site with
signs and barrier plantings; and, restricting access to the coastal
sage scrub mitigation areas on the Olympic Training Center site.
Cumulative impacts include the :oss of habitat and potentially
occurring sensitive species populations on a regional basis due to
increased human activity on the reservoir. The cumulative loss of
Diegan coastal sage scrub and potentially occurring sensitive
- 19 -
lie-3d.-
o?Lf
.
species is considered a significant adverse impact. Potential
significant impacts due to increased human activity will be
mi tigated by implementing remedial measures (e. g., restricting
shoreline access year-round).
Mitiqation Measures
.
Approximately 0.4 acre of high quality Diegan coastal sage
scrub will be impacted by grading for the road and approximately
3.3 acres of disturbed Diegan coastal sage scrub will be impacted
by construction of the boathouse. A 2:1 mitigation ratio will be
used for the high quality sage scrub (approximately 0.8 acre), and
1:1 ratio will be used for the disturbed sage scrub (approximately
3.3 acres). A total of approximately 3.6 acres of Diegan coastal
sage scrub will be planted on the two southern most slopes on the
west side of the Olympic Training Center adjacent to the Salt Creek
dedicated open space. Sensitive plant species should be used in
the coastal sage scrub restoration if available. In addition, all
areas disturbed by grading around the Olympic Training Center
boathouse (including the access road) will be revegetated with
coastal sage scrub.
Since no areas exist around the lake margin to restore
freshwater marsh habitats, impacts to freshwater marsh
(approximately 0.1 acre) habitats shall be mitigated out-of-kind by
planting native riparian tree species along the lake margin,
outside of the freshwater marsh fringe. It is proposed that 20
Fremont cottonwoods (Populus fremontii) be planted at intervals
around the margin of the lake. In addition, except for the sand
path, no maintenance of vegetation around the margin of the lake
will be allowed. The boathouse manager will be responsible for
including a discussion of the timing and distance the floating dock
was moved each year (to avoid wetland impacts) in the Quarterly
Management Report.
.
- 20 -
lie - 3;J
c?3
tit The proposed mitigation areas shall be approved by City of San
Diego and City of Chula Vista staff in consultation with the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service and the California Department of Fish and
Game.
Findinq
All significant impacts will be eliminated or reduced to a
level below significant by virtue of mitigation measures delineated
above.
E. Traffic/Circulation
Impact
.
Development of the boathouse facility would not result in
significant daily traffic impacts to adjacent roadways. However,
during small events (100 spectators or less), shuttling of people
from the OTC main campus area will be necessary once the OTC
Boathouse parking is full (38 spaces). No special events/
competi tions which attract more than 100 spectators shall be
allowed at the OTC Boathouse under this approval. These special
events will be subject to further CEQA review.
Mitiqation Measures
During small events (100 spectators or less), shuttling of
people from the OTC main campus will be required once the OTC
Boathouse parking (38 spaces) is full.
Findinq
.
All significant impacts will be eliminated or reduced to a
level below significant by virtue of mitigation measures delineated
above.
- 21 -
JYC-Jr
~~
.
.
.
V.
INSIGNIFICANT IMPACTS
In accordance with the evaluation provided in SEIR 90-12 and
the Addendums thereto, the following issues have been determined to
be insignificant:
1) Cultural Resources (Section 3.5 of the SEIR);
2) Land Use Consistency (General Plan and Zoning were
addressed in EIR 89-11 for the OTC);
3) Noise (insignificant; OTC impacts were addressed in
EIR 89-11);
4 )
Air Quality (insignificant;
addressed in EIR 89-11);
OTC impacts were
5) Public Services and Utilities (insignificant; OTC
impacts were addressed in EIR 89-11);
6) Socioeconomic and Fiscal Factors (insignificant;
OTC impacts were addressed in EIR 89-11);
7 )
Mineral Resources (insignificant impact);
8) Growth Inducing Impacts (insignificant; OTC impacts
were addressed in EIR 89-11);
9) The relationship between local short-term use of
the environment and the maintenance and enhancement
of long-term productivity (addressed in EIR 89-11);
10) Significant irreversible environmental changes
(addressed in EIR 89-11).
VI. INFEASIBILITY OF MITIGATION MEASURES AND ALTERNATIVES
Public Resources Code Section 21081(B) (C)
The approval of the project will cause significant unavoidable
c.umulative impacts with regard to aesthetics and visual resources.
However, pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(B) (C),
the Decisionmakers find and conclude that the following independent
economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the
project alternatives identified within Section 4 of SEIR 90-12 and
- 22 -
JiC-;IS- -<'7
.
.
.
the mitigation measures not incorporated into the project. The
Decisionmakers further find that each independent consideration,
standing alone, would be sufficient to make infeasible the other
mitigation measures and the project alternatives.
The City Council has considered whether any of the project
alternatives discussed in the SEIR could feasibly substantially
lessen or avoid the identified significant environmental impacts
(see, Citizens for Quality Growth vs. City of Mt. Shasta, (1988)
198 Cal. App. 3rd, 433; see also, Public Resources Code Section
21002). As explained below, the Decisionmakers conclude that none
of the proposed alternatives could both meet the objectives of the
project applicant and lessen or avoid the identified significant
cumulative environmental impact to aesthetic and visual resources.
Other considerations that make infeasible include the
similarity of impacts that would result from implementation of any
of the alternatives. In this regard, SEIR 90-12 concludes that any
project located along the shoreline of Lower Otay Reservoir would
result in significant unmitigated cumulative impacts to aesthetics
and visual resources. Therefore, this significant unmitigated
impact would occur regardless of the alternative adopted and would
not be mitigated by any of the alternatives with the exception of
the "No Project" alternative.
Alternative 1 - No pro;ect
This alternative would retain the site in its current degraded
condition and would not result in obtaining the goals and
objectives of the Chula Vista General Plan, the EastLake III
General Development Plan or the Olympic Training Center Sectional
Planning Area Plan (SPA Plan). The No Project alternative would
not allow the addition of a boat house and launch facility which is
a critical and integral component of the Olympic Training Center.
Therefore, the project objectives would not be met (see Project
- 23 -
)tjC-J6
~g
.
.
.
Description in SEIR 90-12 for details).
Under this alternative, year-round water sports training in
the overall OTC support and environment would not occur. The on
water training and the boat house would not be constructed and
therefore there would be no storage, launching, dock or support
facilities for canoeing, kayaking, and rowing sports associated
with the Olympic Training Center's objectives.
Although this alternative would retain the site in open space
and would avoid the cumulative aesthetic and visual impacts, it
would not allow completion of the Olympic Training Center facility.
Based upon these and other factors, this alternative is determined
to be infeasible.
Alternative Location 1: North Point Relocation Alternative
Alternative Location 1 was created in response to an
identified potential impact regarding the project's perceived
conflict with existing boating/fishing activities now operated from
the nearby City of San Diego boat launch facility. This
alternative involves two sites: the existing City of San Diego
boat launch site and a site across the lake known as "North Point."
This alternative proposes the relocation of the existing "and
planned expansion of" the City of San Diego boat launch facility
from its current site to another city-owned recreational site
across the lake (North Point). The OTC Boathouse facility would
then be ceveloped on the City of San Diego's existing boat
launching facility site.
As described in Section 4 of the SEIR, this alternative had
the potential of avoiding the project's perceived operational/use
conflicts between the OTC water activities and the City of San
Diego recreational activities. However, this alternative would
still result in significant unmitigated cumulative impacts to
- 24 -
/iC-37
~r
.
.
.
aesthetic and visual resources. In addition, this alternative
would result in much more significant biological, archaeological,
and aesthetic impacts than the proposed project. Based upon these
factors and other factors, this alternative is determined to be
infeasible.
Alternative Location 2: City of San Dieqo
Boat Launch (Shared Site)
As a result of evaluating Alternative Location 1 (North Point
site), another alternative location was identified which would
effectively retain both the North Point site and the Boathouse
project site as open space and passive recreational areas. In
concept, this alternative consisted of the implementation of the
City of San Diego expansion project as originally planned and the
development of the OTC Boathouse adjacent to the existing City of
San Diego boat launch facility.
This alternative would result in the retention of both the
proposed project site and the North Point site as open space,
thereby reducing biological and aesthetic impacts. However, this
alternative would result in more significant operational impacts
and land use conflicts (i.e., access, loss of parking, congestion,
boat launching conflicts) than the proposed project. This
alternative would also necessitate a raised building pad, thereby
resulting in more significant cumulative visual and aesthetic
impacts than the proposed project. Based upon these and other
factors, this alternative is determined to be infeasible.
Oriqinally Proposed Pro;ect Site Alternative
The originally proposed project site illustrated in Figure 4-1
of SEIR 90-12 was located just to the north of the project site,
closer to the waters edge. This proposal involved a two-story
building with observation decks on the second story and access to
- 25 -
;t/e -.Jg/
036
.
.
.
the lake from the first floor cement deck area via two pedestrian
pathways. Transition from the deck to the waters edge was to be
accomplished by a rip-rap slope which would begin at the deck's
edge and extend to approximately the 475-foot elevation at waters
edge. This alternative would have resulted in destruction of
undisturbed sage scrub habitat and wetland area. This alternative
would have also resulted in greater impacts to aesthetics and
visual resources. Based upon these and other factors, this
alternative is determined to be infeasible.
VII. ADOPTION OF MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
AB 3180 and Public Resources Code S 21081.6
As required by Assembly Bill 3180 and Public Resources Code
Section 21081.6, the Decisionmakers hereby adopt the Mitigation
Monitoring Program ("Program"), set forth in Exhibit B of SEIR 90-
12, incorporated herein by reference. The Decisionmakers find that
the Program is desi::ned to insure that, during project
implementation, the project applicant, and other responsible
parties, implement the project components and comply with the
feasible mitigation measures identified in SEIR 90-12. This
Program will serve a dual purpose of: a) verifying completion of
the Mitigation Measures for the proposed project; and b) generating
information on the effectiveness of the Mitigation Measures to
guide future decisions. The program includes the following:
1) Monitoring team qualifications;
2) Specific monitoring activities;
3) Reporting system; and
4) Criteria for evaluating the success of the
Mitigation Measures.
- 26 -
JiC-J;
~/
.
.
.
VIII. STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS
CEQA Guidelines Section 15093
The Decisionmakers in approving the various discretionary
actions that are the subject of Final Supplemental Environmental
Impact Report No. 90-12 and Addendums thereto, having considered
the information contained in the Final SEIR, having reviewed and
considered the public testimony and the record, makes the following
Statement of Overriding Considerations in support of the decision
of the public agency which would result in environmental impacts
which would not be reduced to below a level of significance. The
Decisionmakers further find and conclude that the benefits of the
project outweigh its adverse environmental effects. The
Decisionmakers find that the following factors support approval of
the project despite any potential significant environmental
impacts. The Decisionmakers hereby make the following Statement of
Overriding Considerations:
1 )
Approval of the project will result in the following
specific economic, social and other considerations which
the City of Chula Vista considers beneficial, including,
but not limited to:
a) the creation of construction job opportunities in
an economy which is currently lacking job
opportunities;
b)
the addition of a boathouse and launch facility
which is a critical and integral component of the
Olympic Training Center (OTC) allows for the year-
round water sports training in the overall OTC
support environment. The boathouse would provide
the storage, launching, dock and support facilities
for canoeing, kayaking, and rowing sports
associated with the Olympic Training objectives.
- 27 -
/tjc- t/O
,,3~
.
2 )
The location of the OTC and proposed boathouse was
carefully selected by the San Diego Sports Training
Foundation and the USOC to fulfill the goals and
objectives of the United States Olympic Committee (USOC)
and the City.
The ISO-acre site at Lower Otay Lake was officially designated
by the USOC in November 1988 as the site implement part of its
master plan goals to establish year-round training facilities for
Olympic athletes. The site was chosen primarily because of its
proximity to a water body which would permit rowing, kayaking and
canoeing. The selection of the site adjacent to the Lower Otay
Reservoir represents the culmination of two years of planning
studies. In considering the San Diego region, the USOC considered
three basic criteria:
. a superb year-round climate for outdoor training
.
.
a major metropolitan population of sufficient size
to support resident athletes with educational and
employment opportunities
. proximity to a major airport with competitive
services and airfares
.
Over 30 sites in the greater San Diego region were examined by
the San Diego National Sports Training Foundation (Foundation), the
non-profit organization that presented the proposal to the USOC for
development of the Center in this region. All sites were measured
against the needs expressed by the USOC for land size, access,
transportation, proximity to schools, colleges, jobs, and cultural
amenities. After review of all potential alternatives, the Olympic
site at Otay Lake was selected by the Foundation and approved for
the first year-round Olympic Training Course in the United States
by the USOC.
- 28 -
/!c-f;
0:3'3
... The proposed boathouse is an integral component of the OTC.
The Chula Vista/Otay Lake site was eventually chosen, due in part
of the ideal waterfront opportunities provided by the Lower Otay
Lake. Such conditions of available, partially disturbed land
adjacent to waterfront acreage for canoeing, kayaking and rowing
are rare conditions in southern California, and were determined by
the USOC to be a critical component of a comprehensive year-round
Olympic training facility. The most recent. proposal has lowered
the average height of the facility from 29 feet to an average of
approximately 14 feet in height (which has reduced the visual
impact although it is still significant). The most recent proposal
also reduces the area of impact of non-disturbed coastal sage from
approximately 0.6 to approximately 0.4 acres.
...
The Decisionmakers support the
OTC, as described in detail in EIR
complete training support system for
their maximum potential in the
international athletic competitions.
purpose and objectives of the
89-11, which is to provide a
athletes who desire to achieve
Olympic games and other
3) Approval of the project will help fulfill the goals and
objectives of the Chula Vista General Plan, the EastLake
III General Development Plan and the Olympic Training
Center Sectional Planning Area (SPA Plan).
The Decisionmakers find and conclude that each
overriding consideration as set forth herein, standing
be sufficient to conclude that the project should
despite the fact that there may be significant
environmental impacts.
independent
alone, would
be approved
unmitigated
In accordance with Section 15092 of the CEQA Guidelines, the
Lead Agency may decide whether or how to approve or carry out a
project if the agency has:
...
- 29 -
J~/C - t/;2
St
.
.
.
a)
eliminated or substantially lessened all
significant effects on the environment where
feasible as shown in findings; and
b) determined that any remaining significant effects
on the environment found to be unavoidable under
Section 15091 of the CEQA Guidelines are acceptable
due to overriding considerations as described in
Section 15093 of the CEQA Guidelines.
This project complies with Section 15092 as the following
significant impacts have been lessened to a level below
significanc~ by the adopted mitigated measures: recreational use
compatibility; hydrology, water quality, and surface drainage;
biological resources. The Agency finds that the visual impacts
which will be significant and unmitigated will be unavoidable, but
is nevertheless acceptable, due to overriding considerations.
IX. THE RECORD
For the purposes of CEQA and these findings, the record of the
Decisionmakers relating to these actions include the following:
References
1) Browman, R.H. 1973. Soil Survey San Diego Area,
California, United States Department of Agriculture.
2 )
1982. Chula Vista General Plan,
City Council Resolution No. 10996,
City of Chula Vista.
EastLake Policy Plan,
September 7.
3) City of Chula Vista. 1987. Policy: Threshold/Standards
and Growth Management Oversight Committee, November.
4) City of Chula Vista. 1987. Revisions to the Master Fee
Schedule, June.
5 )
City of Chula Vista. 1989. Chula Vista General Plan.
- 30 -
lie ~2/;t
035
.
6 )
City of Chula Vista. 1989. City of Chula Vista General
Plan Update. March
7) City of Chula Vista. 1989. Municipal Code.
8) City of San Diego. 1987. Managers Report No. 87-94,
February 20.
9 )
County of San Diego.
Plan - 1995, Part 11,
August 22.
10) County of San Diego. 1984. San Diego County General
Plan - 1995, Part XXIII, Otay Subregional Plan, August
22.
1984. San Diego County General
Regional Land Use Element and Map,
11) County of San Diego. 1985. The Zoning Ordinance, San
Diego County, November.
12) ERC Environmental and Energy Services Co. 1989.
EastLake III/Olympic Training Center Final EIR, October.
13) ERCE. 1990. Olympic Training Center SPA Plan
Supplemental EIR (89-11), April.
.
14) Greensfe1der, R.W. 1972. Maximum Credible Rock
Acceleration from Earthquakes in California, Map Sheet
23, California Division of Mines & Geology.
15) ICG Inc. 1990. Geotechnical Investigation Boathouse
Site, U.S. Olympic Training Center, San Diego County,
California.
16) ICG Incorporated. 1990. Geotechnical Investigation for
Boathouse site, January.
17) Kennedy, M.P. and S.S. Tan. 1977. Geology of National
City, Imperial Beach and Otay Mesa Quadrangles, Southern
San Diego Metropolitan Area, California.
18) Kennedy, M.P. and S.S. Tan. 1977. Geology of National
City, Imperial Beach and Otay Mesa Quadrangles, Southern
San Diego Metropolitan Area, California, Map Sheet 29,
California Division of Mines & Geology.
19) Real, C.R., T.R. Topozada, and D.L. Parke.
Earthquake Epicenter Map of California.
1978.
20) Rick Engineering.
Design Report.
1991.
Soakaway Basin Conceptual
.
- 31 -
/t/c-L/t(
310
.
.
.
21) USDA Soil Conservation Service. 1978. Soil Survey, San
Diego Area, California.
Also included in the record are the following studies prepared
for the OTC Boathouse project:
1) Olympic Training Center Boathouse, Otay Reservoir Project
Description (June 1991).
2) United States Olympic Boathouse at Lower Otay Reservoir
Facilities Management Plan (November 1991).
3) Conditional Use Permit Package submitted to City of Chula
Vista (May 1992).
Also included as part of the Decisionmakers' record are the
following:
1 )
Final EIR 90-12, Olympic Training Center Boathouse (June
1992), including all related appendices.
2)
Documentary and oral evidence presented to the
Decisionmakers during public hearings on SEIR 90-12 and
Addendums thereto, as well as any other evidence
presented at the various hearings regarding the project.
3) City of San Diego Lakes Master Plan.
4) Matters of common knowledge to the Planning Commission
and/or City Council, including these and all other
formally adopted policies and ordinances:
a) The City of Chula Vista General Plan - and EIR 88-2
b) The Zoning Ordinance of the City of Chula Vista
c) The Municipal Code of the City of Chula Vista
- 32 -
~
) Lj c -L/~ 037
SENT BY:Xerox Telecopier 7021
Board Of Directors
Craig Adam'
Daniel Allen
8i11 AndCrM)n
Jim Boll
Wayne BUSA
NicD Calavltl
Paul Coole)'
Clare Crane
Charle, Cooper
Pete C"lhbert
Norma Damashek
Bruce Do.mmaM
Stc:v~ E5trada
Ann Ferebee
Loi5 FonS.Sllknl
Mont)' Oriffin
Blmer Keen
Stan Keniston
Ma.rlette Kobrak
Carol Landllman
Anselea. Leire.
F..d Merkl
Vonn.Maric MIlY
Linda Michael
Kimball Moore
Dunham Reilly
Karen Scarborough
Kathy Schwartz
Keith Simon
Andrew Spurlock
Michael Stcpner
Jl.ldith Swink
Gar)' Weber
Connit Willens
Frank Wolden
Don Wood
7-2B-92 3:30PM :ARCO TRAINING CENTER~CITY OF CHULA VISTA ;# 2
Citizens Coordinate
for
CenlW')' 3
1549 EI Prado, Rm. 4
Sill DlciO. CA 9210 I
Tel: (619) 232.7196
RECEIVED
V2 Jl.28 P3:5Z
June 23, 1992
CITY OF ,~, " , "'ST
' Li :~J.j :yI A
CITY CLERK'S OFFiCE
Mr. Dave Nielsen, Executive Vice President
San Diego National Sports Training Foundation
1904 Hotel Circle North
San Diego, CA 92108
Dear Dave:
Pursuant to your architeotural presentation to the C-3
Executive Committee on June lOr 1992 regarding a proposed
Boathouse for the Olympic Training Center in Chula Vista,
C-3 feels that both the site plan and the building
elevationa ahow sensitivity to the area at large and that
the facility as described would be an acceptable addition
to the property masterplan.
We would appreciate your oontinuing to keep us informed.
Sincerely,
Frederick M. Marks, President
P'MM/ojl
OCI C-3 Executive Committee
>
/ LjC --- L/~
Revised to Include Minor Technical Corrections
Marked to Show Changes
Item No. 14C
Agenda: July 28, 1992
RESOLUTION NO. 16730
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA PERMITTING THE USE OF CERTAIN DES-
IGNATED PROPERTY AS OLYMPIC TRAINING CENTER
BOATHOUSE ON CERTAIN DESIGNATED CONDITIONS,
CERTIFYING THE FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT NO.
90-12, AND MAKING CERTAIN CEQA FINDINGS, AP-
PROVING AND ADOPTING THE MITIGATION MONITORING
PROGRAM AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERA-
TIONS FOR THE OLYMPIC TRAINING CENTER BOAT
HOUSE.
WHEREAS, the city of San Diego owns the following acreage:
approximately 100 acres located in the city of Chula vista
generally located between Wueste Road and the 480 foot contour
level of the Lower Otay Lake Reservoir bounded on the south by the
territorial boundary of the City of Chula vista and on the'north by
a hypothetical extension of Otay Lakes Road, diagrammatically
presented on the small area map attached hereto as Exhibit A,
("Property"); and,
WHEREAS,
("Applicant" )
Property from
and operating
the San Diego National Sports Training Foundation
has leased a 3.77 acres of land located on the
the City of San Diego for the purposes of building
a Olympic Training Center Boathouse; and,
WHEREAS, our Municipal Code considers, at section 19.54.010
(m), such use, to wit: a pUblic or quasi public use, in an A-100
Zone to be an unclassified use, and at section 19.20.040,
unclassified uses are permitted if the City issues a conditional
use permit specifying conditions on which such use may be
permitted; and,
WHEREAS, a duly verified application ("Application") for a
conditional use permit was filed with the Planning Department of
the City of Chula vista on July 23, 1991, by San Diego National
Sports Training Foundation, and,
WHEREAS, the proj ect ("Olympic Training Center Boathouse
Project" or alternatively, "Project") which is the subject matter
of the environmental review herein referenced is the construction
and use of an olympic Training Center Boathouse consisting of three
buildings (not including deck) consisting of a total of 13,496
square foot on a total of 3.1 land acres and 0.07 water surface
boathsr2.wp
July 26, 1992
CUP Reso for Boathouse Use
Page 1
1'-/ c ~&17
acres (for the dock and ramp), all as more fully described in the
city of Chula vista Final Environmental Impact Report No. 90-12,
which description is incorporated herein by reference; and,
WHEREAS, a draft Environmental Impact Report dated November
1992, evaluating the proposed Olympic Training Center Boathouse
Project was prepared and was transmitted by the City of Chula
Vista, as lead agency, to all concerned parties for review and
comment; and,
WHEREAS, notice of the availability of the Draft Supplemental
Environmental Impact Report was given as required by law; and,
WHEREAS, written comments from the public on the Draft
Supplemental Environmental Impact Report were accepted during a
45-day review period; and,
WHEREAS, based on a project change suggested by the Applicant
during the public comment period that a dock be included in the
Project which had not been environmentally addressed, a Recircu-
lated Draft Environmental Impact Report, dated April ~ 1992 was
prepared; and
WHEREAS, the Recirculated Draft Environmental Impact Report,
dated April 1992, evaluating the proposed Olympic Training Center
Boathouse, was prepared and was transmitted by the city of Chula
vista to all concerned parties for review and comment; and,
WHEREAS, Notice of the Availability of the Recirculated Draft
Environmental Impact Report was given as required by law; and,
WHEREAS, written comments from the public on the Recirculated
Draft Environmental Impact Report were accepted April 25,1992 to
June 17, 1992; and,
WHEREAS, the city Planning commission held a public hearing
and accepted public testimony on the Recirculated Draft Environ-
mental Impact Report on June 17, 1992; and,
WHEREAS, the State Clearinghouse informed the City that none
of the resource agencies had comments, and public comments have
been addressed in the Final Environmental Impact Report for the
Olympic Training Center Boathouse; and,
WHEREAS, notice of the availability of the Final Environmental
Impact Report was given to commentators on the Recirculated Draft
Environmental Impact Report on July 13, 1992; and,
WHEREAS, no written responses to comments on the Final Envi-
ronmental Impact Report were received by the lead agency; and,
boathsr2.wp
July 26, 1992
CUP Reso for Boathouse Use
Page 2
lie-ift'
WHEREAS, the Final Environmental Impact Report was prepared in
accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental
Quality Act and its applicable Guidelines; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission set the time and place for a
hearing on said Application for a conditional use permit and notice
of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its
publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and
its mailing to property owners within 1,000 feet of the exterior
boundaries of the property at least ten days prior to the hearing;
and,
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as adver-
tised, namely 7:00 p.m., July 8, 1992, in the Council Chambers, 276
Fourth Avenue, before the Planning Commission and said hearing was
thereafter closed; and,
WHEREAS, on July 1, 1992, the Commission certified that the
Final Environmental Impact Report on the project, EIR-90-12,
("FEIR") complied with CEQA and its guidelines; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning commission recommended the approval of
said Application on July 8th, 1992 on certain terms and conditions
as contained in their Planning commission Resolution Nos. PCZ-92-C,
PCC-92-C, and EIR-90-12, includinq adoption of the CEOA Findinqs
and Statement of Overridinq Considerations;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city Council of the
City of Chula vista does hereby find, determine, resolve and order
as follows:
I. The Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report.
The Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report for the
Olympic Training Center Boathouse consists of:
A. Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (EIR
90-12) SCH #90010709, dated July 28, 1992, which contains
(1) the Recirculated Draft EIR; (2) Responses to Comments
on the Recirculated Draft, copies of comment letters on
the Recirculated Draft, and responses; and (3) two
addenda; and,
B. Appendices (A through I) to Environmental Impact Reports
for the Olympic Training Center Boathouse dated April
1992.
II. FEIR Reviewed and Considered.
The Final Environmental Impact Report has been reviewed and
boathsr2.wp
July 26, 1992
CUP Reso for Boathouse Use
Page 3
I Lj C -1-/9
considered by the City Council of the City of Chula vista; and
III. certification.
The Final Environmental Impact Report is hereby certified by
the City Council to have been completed in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act and all applicable
guidelines
IV. Grant of Conditional Use Permit.
The City Council hereby grants a conditional use permit for
the use of the 3.7 acre site as an Olympic Training Center
Boathouse subject to the following conditions:
A. The Project is built and maintained in the manner
described in the FEIR.
B. All of the mitigation measures specified within the
Mitigation Monitoring Program for EIR-90-12 are hereby
incorporated as conditions of approval unless otherwise
modified by other conditions of approval listed herein.
Those measures include, but are not limited to, compli-
ance with all of the project and operational parameters
outlined in the Facilities Management Plan, Boathouse
Parking Plan and other application plans and materials,
as modified by the mitigation measures specified in the
Mitigation Monitoring Program for EIR-90-12.
Prior to the issuance of a building permit, applicant
shall generate and file with both cities, an updated
version of the Facilities Management Plan which
incorporates the Mitigation Monitoring Program changes,
adds the Boathouse Parking Plan (as modified by the
Mitigation Monitoring Program) and the felle\:il'lljJ tue
gondi tions Lettered F and E of this section IV, regarding
"special events."
C. Monitoring of mitigation measures is conducted in the
manner described in the Mitigation Monitoring Program.
D. This conditional use permit shall not become effective
until the zoning of the property becomes effective (ref.:
PCZ-n-C) .
E. The project design shall comply with the plan approved or
conditionally approved by the Design Review Committee
(ref.: DRC-92-58).
F. For proposed special events expected to attract more than
boathsr2.wp
July 26, 1992
CUP Reso for Boathouse Use
Page 4
Fie -5' t?
100 spectators, applicant shall first obtain a separate
conditional use permit, or a "special events permit" if
and when Chula vista adopts an ordinance providing
therefore, and additional environmental review by the
city of Chula vista.
G. For minor special events (those expected to attract less
than 100 spectators but more spectators than on-site
parking will accommodate) personnel shall be posted at
the entrance to Boathouse Road to provide maps and
assistance in directing overflow spectators to
parking/shuttle locations on the main OTC campus.
H. This permit shall be subject to any and all new,
modified, or deleted conditions imposed after adoption of
this resolution to advance a legitimate governmental
interest related to health, safety or welfare which city
shall impose after advance written notice to the
permittee and after the City has given to the permittee
the right to be heard with regard thereto. However, the
City, in exercising this reserved right/condition, may
not impose a substantial expense or deprive Permittee of
a substantial revenue source which the Permittee can not,
in the normal operation of the use permitted, be expected
to economically recover.
I. This conditional use permit shall become void and
ineffective if not utilized within one year from the
effective date thereof, in accordance with section
19.14.260 of the Municipal Code. Failure to comply with
any condition of approval shall cause this permit to be
reviewed by the city for additional conditions or
revocation.
failing any of which conditions, or failing the continued
maintenance of same as the condition may require, this permit,
shall, following a public hearing by the City Council at which the
Applicant or his successor in interest is given notice and the
opportunity to appear and be heard with regard thereto, be
terminated or modified by the City Council.
v. Non-CEOA Findinqs
1. That the proposed use at the location is necessary or
desirable to provide a service or facility which will
contribute to the general well being of the neighborhood
or the community.
The OTC Boathouse is an essential component of the Olympic
Training Center, and will provide a training facility for
boathsr2.wp
July 26, 1992
CUP Reso for Boathouse Use
Page 5
lL/C-~1
international class athletes, as well as the community, in
canoeing, kayaking, and rowing.
The approval of the project will result in the following
economic, social, and other considerations which the city of
Chula vista considers beneficial, including, but not limited
to: (A) the creation of construction job opportunities in an
economy which is currently lacking job opportunities; and (B)
the addition of a boathouse and launch facility which is a
critical integral component of the Olympic Training Center
which will allow for the year-round water sports training in
an overall Olympic training support environment.
The Boathouse would provide the storage, launching, dock and
support facilities for canoeing, kayaking, and rowing sports
associated with the Olympic training objectives. The city
considers a complete Olympic training support facility for
athletes as a method for contributing to the general well
being of the community. Valued role models for the youth of
the City will be provided as the athletes train for Olympic
competition.
The approval of the project will help fulfill the goals and
objectives of the Chula vista General Plan, the City of San
Diego Progress Guide and General Plan, and the City of San
Diego Lakes Master Plan, which all encourage recreational uses
on the lake.
2. That such use will not under the circumstances of the
particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety or
general welfare of persons residing or working in the
vicinity or injurious to property or improvements in the
vicinity.
The conditions as set forth in the Conditional Use Permit, the
Facilities Management Plan, the Parking Plan, and the
Mitigation Measures as outlined in EIR 90-12 and Addendums
thereto, will insure that the Boathouse and its related uses
will not be detrimental to the health, safety or general
welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity or
injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity. A
thorough Environmental Impact Report and Mitigation Monitoring
Program has been prepared to assure that the impacts will be
mitigated as much as possible.
3. That the proposed use will comply with the regulations
and conditions specified in the code for such use.
Pursuant to the conditions of approval of the CUP, as well as
all of the measures identified in Finding 2 above, compliance
boathsr2.wp
July 26, 1992
CUP Reso for Boathouse Use
Page 6
;L)c /5rJ-
with all applicable codes, conditions, and regulations will be
assured prior to the issuance of development permits. In
addition, based upon Facilities Management Plan and the
Mitigation Monitoring Program, compliance with all applicable
codes, conditions, and regulations shall be assured on a
continuing basis thereafter.
4. That the granting of this conditional use permit will not
adversely affect the general plan of the City or the
adopted plan of any government agency.
The granting of this Conditional Use Permit is consistent with
the goals and objectives of the Chula Vista General Plan, the
EastLake III General Development Plan, and the Olympic
Training Center sectional Plan Area (SPA Plan). The Olympic
Training Center is listed as a community activity center of
the land use element. In addition, the Olympic Training
Center and accompanying boathouse use is specifically
identified as a planning area and sub-neighborhood contained
within the Eastern Territory of Chula Vista.
The city of Chula vista General Plan indicates that the
Olympic training activity center is intended to become the
major training center in the nation for Olympic sports (e.g.,
water sports, track and field, etc.). Activities will include
short and long-term training for elite and development level
athletes, seminars, clinics, and conferences, as well as
sports medicine and sports science research.
Because the Boathouse and water sports training is such an
integral part of the overall Olympic Training Center campus,
the Conditional Use Permit for its use will not adversely
affect the General Plan of the City or the adopted plan of any
government agency.
VI. CEOA Findinqs
A. Adoption of Findinqs.
The Council does hereby approve and incorporate as if set
forth full herein, and make each and everyone of the CEQA
Findings attached hereto.
B. Certain Mitiqation Measures Feasible and Adopted.
As more fully identified and set forth in the previous
environmental documents for this project area and this
supplemental environmental document (EIR-90-12) and the CEQA
Findings for this project which is hereby attached hereto,
Council hereby finds that pursuant to Public Resources Code
boathsr2.wp
July 26, 1992
CUP Reso for Boathouse Use
Page 7
/L/c '-33
section 21081 and CEQA Guidelines section 15091, that the
mitigation measures described in the above referenced document
are feasible and will become binding upon the appropriate
entity such as the Applicant, the City, or other special
districts which has to implement these specific mitigation
measures.
C. Feasibility of Alternatives.
As is also noted in the environmental documents referenced in
the immediately preceding paragraph, alternatives to the
proj ect which were identified as potentially feasible are
hereby found not to be feasible.
D. Adoption of Mitiqation Monitorinq Proqram.
As required by the Public Resources Code section 21081.6, City
Council hereby adopts the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program set forth in FEIR to this resolution and incorporated
herein by reference as set forth in full. The city Council
recommends that the Council find that the Program is designed
to ensure that during the project implementation and opera-
tion, the Applicants and other responsible parties implement
the project components and comply with the feasible mitigation
measures identified in the Findings and in the Program.
E. Statement of Overridinq Considerations.
Even after the adoption of all feasible mitigation measures,
certain significant or potentially significant environmental
affects caused by the project or cumulatively will remain.
Therefore, the City Council of the City of Chula vista issue
pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15093, as set forth,
attached hereto, a Statement of Overriding Considerations
identifying the specific economic, social, and other
considerations that render the unavoidable significant adverse
environmental effects still significant but acceptable.
F. Notice of Determination.
City Council directs the City Clerk Environmental Review
Coordinator to post a Notice of Determi tion and files the
same with the County Clerk.
Bruce M. Boog
City Attorney
P7L;;:1 U
Robert A. Leiter
Director of Planning
boathsr2.wp
July 26, 1992
CUP
for Boathouse Use
Page 8
lie -5'-1
~";;Ji..y-...
File No.
PUBLIC HEARlNG CHECK LIST
CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARlNG DATE 'r I,) 'Is I ctd
SUBJECT ~tQ..-qJ--a4: ~ LL... (l ~ - ~ ~.D hd.:Q Sr~ ~
bOG1.T1?~ '^J~~ r':~~ .l ~ "--- ~"f~
'<oJ~ ~ 13,~ ~J.Ot:-\
SENT TO STAR NEWS FOR PUBLICATION u B FAX~BY HAND_; BY MAIL
'/ I,,, (a.d-
I
PUBLICATION DATE
MAILED NOTICES TO PROPERTY OWNERS
~~
NO. MAILED
\.;}3-
PER GC 54992 Legislative Staff, Construction Industry Fed, 6336 Greenwich Dr Suite F. San Diego, 92122
LOGGED IN AGENDA BOOK ., I, :5/ Cj.;y
I
COPIES TO:
Administration (4) /
PIanning/
Originating Department
Engineering,../'
Others
City Clerk's Office (2) ~
POST ON BULLETIN BOARDS
,ll<.o!CJif-
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:
-58-
If ~-~-j--
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
BY TIlE CHUI.A VISTA CITY COUNCD.
CHUI.A VISTA, CAUFORNIA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL will hold a public
hearing to consider the following:
DRC-92-31: A precise plan proposing construction of 14
detached, single-family dwellings with attached two car
garages on individual lots served by private streets. The lot
areas and lot dimensions are less than those required for R-1-S
zoned properties, but project offers common open space and
recreation areas to compensate for the smaller lots.
PCS-92-01: A request for consideration of a Tentative
Subdivision Map, DATE-PALM VILLAS, to develop a IS-lot
subdivision consisting of 14 dwelling units on 1.98 acres,
located between Date Street and Plam Avenue in R-1-S-P
Zoning District in Chula Vista.
PCZ-92-C: Considering zoning approximately 100 acres
(Agricultural zone - 100 acre minimum parcel size)
constituting the westerly shore of Lower Otay Lake (the area
between the lake and Wueste Road, south of Otay Lakes
Road) .
PCC-92-04: Considering a conditional use permit from San
Diego National Sports Training Foundation to construct an
Olympic Training Center Boathouse facility on approximately
3 acres located on westerly shore of Lower Otay Lake.
If you wish to challenge the City's action on this matter in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this
notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk's Office at or prior to the,
public hearing.
SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL on Tuesday, July 28,
1992, at 6:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue,
at which time any person desiring to be heard may appear.
DATED:
July 16, 1992
Beverly A. Authelet
City Clerk
ly__(0-{}0
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL
of Chula Vista, California, for the purpose of considering an application for
a conditional use permit. The application, submitted by the San Diego
National Sports Training Foundation, requests permission to construct an
Olympic Training Center Boathouse facility including 13,500 sq. ft. structure
and associated deck and docking facilities, along with 38 parking spaces, on
approximately three (3) acres located on the westerly shore of Lower Otay
Lake, directly east of the main ISO-acre Olympic Training Center site. The
purpose of the project is to provide a training facility for American rowers
and paddl ers (canoers and kayakers) prepari ng for i nternat i onal compet i t ion.
A plot plan and legal description is on file in the office of the Planning
Department. Any petitions to be submitted to the City Council must be
received by the City Clerk's office no later than noon of the hearing date.
If you wish to challenge the City's action on this conditional use permit in
court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else
raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written
correspondence delivered to the City Clerk at or prior to the public hearing.
SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL on Tuesday, July 28,
1992, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building,
276 Fourth Avenue, at which time any person desiring to be heard may appear.
DATED: July 15, 1992
CASE NO. PCC-92-04
WPC 0407p
If /~. 01
,
.
I
.
.
..
,
.
II
II
II
II
II
II
~
II
~
II
tI
~ERCE
.....
2-2
PCC-92-04
Dept. of Public Works
Design Engineering Section
2
of Parks & Recreation
Noel Parr, Chief
Dept of Planning & Land Use
Attn: Lauren Wasserman
Calif. Dept of Water Resources
Attn: John Pariewski
San Diego Audubon Society
S.D. County Archaeological
Society
Attn: J
The Baldwin Company
Attn: . .
..
".
1'1 ~e -51
--- ---
G
NOTICE ,FOR ALL IS'S AND EIR'S ARE TO BE MAILED TO THIS LIST
Chamber of Commerce
Attn: Don Reed
, Reporter
rofessional Assn.
Native Plan Society
Michel Beauchamp
10
Cam Patterson
S.D. Assn. f Environmental
Bio .
District
Sweetwater Union H.S. District
. Tom Sil va
o
Chula Vista Elementary School
District
Attn: Kate Shurson
San Diego Biodiversity Project
Attn: David Hogan
~
Bill Robens
;....~b
!
Citizens Coord. For Centur
Three
Cam Patterson
ntal
d
, I
- ~-
nc.
fii)
/-1/[ (PO
'.
.PCC-92-04
Teresa Aland
County of San Diego
of Public Works
Naomi R. Ross
Jackie McQuade
Chuck Schrader
Joy Thonneson
Bryan Edwards
Meredith Sinclair
nelli
.
Frank Edwards
Bob Burgreen
~~ce San Diego
S 2
Emily Durbi n
Byron Lindsley
Mountain Defense League
Norman Allenby,
San Diego Row'
Leslie Klein
Associate Executive Director
U.S. ~anoe ~ Kayak Team
Paula Oyer, Executive Director
U.S. Rowing Association
Pan American Plaza, Suite 400
Matt Smith
U.S. Rowing Association
Pan American Plaza, Suite 400
Steve Kelly
Chairman, Sprint Racing Committ
U.S. Canoe & Kayak Team
Anday Toro
USOC Board of Directors
Can
City of San Diego
Attn:
ifi)
Neil
, .
. PCC-92-04
8
Metropolitan Water District
1 Sunset Blvd
Calif. Dept of Fish & Game
Attn: Pete Bontachilli, Dir.
S.D. Water Quality Control
Attn: L. Delaney
1
District Engineer
[os Angeles District
Cor s
San Diego County Water
Authority
Attn: Byron Buck
Calif. Dept. of Fish & Game
Attn: Michael D. McCollam
Chief Deputy Director
o
Flood Forecasting Branch
Div. of Flood Managment
Dept of Water Resources
h
1
6
of Water Resources
Division of Water Quality
State Water Resources Control
Board
City of San Diego
Environmental Analysis Sec.
Attn: Janet
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Attn' ey, Bioligist
Calif. Dept. of Fish & Game
Attn: Kris Lal, Assoc.
. t
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
Attn: Nanc Gilbert
Dept. Of Transportation
District 11
Attn: Christina Van Wanseele
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers
Attn: Jim M rtetus
San Diego engineering &
Development Dept.
Attn: P
Dept. of Fish & Game
Attn: Robert Radovich
Assoc. Fisher Biologist
SANDAG
First Interstate Plaza
Attn: Rick Alexander
-+ -~.
Jamul/Dulzura Subregional
Planning Group
Attn: ontijo
PCC-92-04
1.;11
Wi 11 Sni ffi n
--
City of San Diego Lakes Corom
c/o Jim Brown
643-040-0500
Western Salt Co.
_12
647-080-0100
City of San Diego
c/o Pro er
Paul Crawford
Property Department
City of San DieQo
Matt Peters9n
.~
A. Hix Planning Dept.
Cit . 0, Admin. Bldg
Ellen Mosley
Senior Planner
City of San Di~go
J. Willett % G. Hanson
Chr. Cit. Adv. Corom O.V.Reg
Park
Terrence Curren
Glen Brandenburg
tr.
... ~..
Th
,".
/ --I ~_ ~ fr;;L
Michael Tramasco
Ralph Priem
Kevin Mineo
George Hanson
Skip Bowman
City of San Diego
Attn: Janet Myers
State of California
Dept. of Boating and Waterways
Attn: William Ivers
Conty Archaeological
(EIR)
City of San Diego
Water Utilities De t.
(EIR)
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
~
/j
.
Meeting Date Julv 28. 1992
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
Yes_No-1LI
The applicant has submitted an application for a precise plan and
tentative subdivision map proposing construction of 14 detached,
single-family dwellings on 1.98 acres located in the R-1-5P Zone
between Date street and Palm Avenue south of Otay Valley Road in
the Montgomery Planning Area.
The Environmental Review Coordinator conducted an Initial study,
IS-92-19, for potential environmental impacts associated with the
implementation of the project. Based on the attached Initial study
and comments thereon, if any, the Coordinator has concluded that
there would be no significant environmental impacts, and recommends
adoption of the Negative Declaration issued on IS-92-19.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Council adopt the resolutions approving DRC-92-31 and PCS-92-
01.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION:
At a regularly scheduled meeting of the Resource Conservation (RCCI
held on February 24, 1992, a motion was approved to accept the
Mitigated Negative Declaration and add a comment about providing an
adequate play area. The vote was 4-to-1. An excerpt of the
minutes is attached which provides details of other comments made
on the project by the RCC.
15"-1
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date Julv 28. 1992
,..-
/5
On June 8, 1992, at a duly held public hearing, the Montgomery
Planning Committee considered this project and voted 6-to-0-to-l to
recommend approval of DRC-92-31 and PCS-92-01 for DATE-PALM VILLAS.
At its meeting of June 24, 1992, the Planning commission voted to
recommend that Council approve the Precise Plan (DRC-92-31) and
Tentative Subdivision Map (PCS-92-01) for DATE-PALM VILLAS by a
vote of 5-to-l-to-l.
DISCUSSION:
ADJACENT ZONING AND LAND USE
Zoninq
Land Use
site
North
South
East
West
R-1-5-P
R-1-5-P
R-1-5-P
R-1-5-P
R-1-5-P
VACANT/RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
RESIDENTIAL
EXISTING SITE CHARACTERISTICS
The present site, composed of two parcels, is for the most part
vacant with the exception of two single family dwelling units on
the westerly portion off Date Street. The area slopes gently from
northeast to southwest. Although paved, both Date Street and Palm
Avenue lack any improvements so far as curb, gutter and sidewalk.
TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP
The developer proposes to subdivide the 2.12 gross acres (1.98 net
acres) into 15 lots. Fourteen of these lots are to contain
dwellings, while the fifteenth lot will contain common, private
open space, access driveways and parking areas.
Two access points are proposed, one off Date Street to serve the
western seven units, and one off Palm Avenue to serve the eastern
seven units. To prevent a "through drive", each access dead ends
at a parking area next to open space, one along the northern
property line, the other along the southern property line.
Since this area has a "P" designator (please note the zoning of R-
1-5-P), variations in lot size are permitted per Chapter 19.56 and
the minimum 5,000 square foot lot size is not required to be met in
every circumstance. Clustering is also allowed under the
provisions of this chapter. As stated in section 19.56.040:
"The purpose of the P precise plan modifying district is to
allow diversification in the spatial relationship of land
/-.? ,).,
Page 3, Item
Meeting Date Julv 28. 1992
l~
uses, density, buildings, structures, landscaping and open
spaces, as well as design review of architecture and signs
though the adoption of specific conditions of approval of
development of property in the city. within the boundaries of
the P district, the location, height, size and setbacks of
buildings or structures, open spaces, signs and densities
indicated on the precise plan shall take precedence over the
otherwise applicable regulations of the underlying zone."
The above section implements Section 6.3 of the Land Use Element of
the General Plan, which requires preservation of the natural
landform, the development of amenity and recreational facilities
through the aggregation of open space and the enhancement of land
use order, visual and functional quality and livability. This
project is considered a superior development because it does all of
this.
Those areas where the project does not strictly implement the R-1-5
zoning district are discussed under the section titled "PRECISE
PLAN."
PRECISE PLAN
The proposed precise plan depicts development of 14 detached single
family dwellings with attached two-car garages, guest parking and
common recreational amenities, as well as installation of
landscaping and general site improvements on 1.98 net acres.
The plan features a "rotated" building arrangement which emphasizes
the primary and most architecturally enhanced building elevations,
minimizes the visibility and repetitiveness of driveway access
areas and creates an overall interesting street scene.
The design of the proposed two-story residences incorporates multi-
gable and hip roof combinations and utilizes a multiple exterior
color and building materials palette.
Single story elements, popouts and architectural projections
provide a gradual transition between the two-story building mass
and pedestrian/human scale.
The proposed site plan arrangement provides private yards for each
dwelling as well as a centralized and easily accessible common
recreational area, and balances the need for individual unit open
space while it fosters the idea of neighborhood and community by
providing a focal point for the entire development.
NOTE: The site is located in the Montgomery Specific Plan area.
This area had the "P" modifying district applied at the time the
Montgomery area was rezoned to City zoning designations.
1S'--3
Page 4, :J:tem
Meeting Date Julv 28. 1992
/5
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Although the Montgomery Planning Committee adopted the Negative
Declaration, they expressed some reservations. Their first concern
was with the amount of traffic which would be generated by the
project and any possibility of signalization at Main street and
Date street. The response of the Engineering Department listed in
the transportation section of the Negative Declaration shows an
estimated number of new trips to be generated by the project as 110
ADT (140 less 30 for the existing dwellings). This figure is based
on the commonly used SANDAG guideline of 10 ADT per dwelling. This
will result in a total ADT on Main street of 21,690 after
construction of the project, or a Level of Service (LOS) A.
Another concern of the Montgomery Planning Committee is the lack of
a traffic signal at the intersection of Date Street and Main
Street. A light will be installed if and when it is warranted, but
in any case the applicant is required to pay a proportional share
via DIF fee for any new traffic light based on the impact of the
project (Condition 23.a.ii).
The Committee was also concerned about the impact of drainage and
how it would affect this and neighboring sites to the southwest.
A drainage study has not yet been completed for this project. One
is, however, required prior to the approval of the final map
(Condition 12). The drainage study must include or address methods
to reduce the 100 year frequency runoff from the site to a level
equal to or less than the current runoff; must analyze impacts to
downstream properties and/or streets to the point that flows enter
a public storm drain; and make recommendations as to improvements
necessary to reduce impacts from this project.
The drainage problems that occurred in the area of the project were
traced to 1986, 1988 and March of 1991, and occurred along Palm
Avenue. The project, since it drains toward Date Street, will not
impact the problems associated with Palm Avenue. It should be
noted, though, that the project will be required to improve the
drainage structures along its frontage on Palm Avenue and Date
Street.
F:J:SCAL :J:MPACT: Not applicable.
/5-r
RESOLUTION NO.
/(g 73)
RESOLUTION OF THE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL
APPROVING THE PRECISE PLAN APPLICATION
FOR DATE-PALM VILLAS, DRC-92-31
WHEREAS, a duly verified application for a Precise Plan
was filed with the Planning Department of the City of Chula vista
on December 20, 1991 by Mr. T. David Eyres, and
WHEREAS, said application requested a precise plan
proposing construction of 14 detached, single-family dwellings with
attached two car garages on individual lots served by private
streets. The property is located' between Date Street and Palm
Avenue south of otay Valley Road in the Montgomery Planning Area,
and
WHEREAS, the City Council set the time and place for a
hearing on said design review application and notice of said
hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in
a newspaper of general circulation in the city and its mailing to
property owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the
property at least ten days prior to the hearing, and
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as
advertised, namely 6:00 p.m., July 28, 1992 in the Council
Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the City Council and said
hearing was thereafter closed, and
WHEREAS, the city Council found that the project would
have no significant environmental impacts and adopted the Negative
Declaration issued on IS-92-19.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL
finds as follows:
Pursuant to Section 19.14.576 of the Zoning Ordinance, the
precise plan for DATE-PALM VILLAS, DRC-92-31, is found to be
in conformance with the various elements of the city's General
Plan based on the following:
1. That such plan will not, under the circumstances of the
particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety or
general welfare of persons residing or working in the
vicini ty, or injurious to property or improvements in the
vicinity in that the project represents a superior site
and architectural design of a presently under-improved
property.
.
2.
That such plan
application of the
Section 19.56.041
satisfies the principal for the
"P" modifying district as set forth in
in that the subject property was
15/) -/
Resolution No.
J~?;:J /
Page 2
rezoned with the "P" designator under the Montgomery area
rezoning program.
3. That any exceptions granted which deviate from the
underlying zoning requirements shall be warranted only
when necessary to meet the purpose and application of the
"P" precise plan modifying district in that the reduced
lot sizes allow for an overall superior design and common
open space amenity that would otherwise not have been
incorporated as part of this project.
4. That approval of this plan will conform to the General
Plan and the adopted policies of the City as listed in
the approval of PCS-92-01 for DATE-PALM VILLAS, under the
section for Findings - Tentative Subdivision Map.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL hereby
approves the Precise Plan for DATE-PALM VILLAS, DRC-92-31, subject
to the following conditions:
1. units #5 and #9 shall maintain a minimum 10 foot exterior
yard setback.
2. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant
shall submit a fence design program to the Director of
Planning for review and approval.
3. All fences shall maintain a minimum 10 foot exterior side
yard setback from sidewalks and curbs.
4. The two parking stalls located at the terminus of the
main access driveways into the site and adjacent to the
common open space area shall be striped as "NO PARKING"
and shall function as turnaround areas.
5. The proposed four foot wide sidewalks along the northerly
side of the driveway access off of Date Street and the
southerly side of the driveway access off of Palm Avenue
shall be extended along the frontage of units #6 and #8,
respectively.
6. The building elevations for proposed exterior design
schemes and reverse models shall be revised and shall
incorporate wall projections and roof modifications per
staff sketch #1.
7. The proposed bathroom windows on the front building
elevations shall be relocated per staff sketch #1.
/5/1 ' d...
Resolution No. /67.3/
Page 3
8.
The proposed windows and doors on
elevations (scheme "A" and "B")
staff sketch #1.
the left side building
shall be aligned per
9. A detailed landscaping and irrigation plan shall be
submitted to the city Landscape Architect for review and
approval prior to issuance of building permits. The
landscaping plan design shall reflect an imaginative play
area design rather than a structured play structure area.
Boulder outcrops, mounding landforms and seating areas
are encouraged to be incorporated within the final
landscaping plan design. The landscape plan shall
incorporate low-water usage techniques and devices, to
the satisfaction of the Director of Planning.
That a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the
owners of the property.
Presented by
Robert A. Leiter
Director of Planning
Bruce M. Boogaa
City Attorney
)5"/1:3
Revised to Include Dates of Planning Commission
and Montgomery Planning Committee Actions
Marked with IEOLtHE to Show Added Paragraphs
"""""""",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Item No. 15a
Agenda: July 28, 1992
RESOLUTION NO. 16731
RESOLUTION OF THE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL
APPROVING THE PRECISE PLAN APPLICATION
FOR DATE-PALM VILLAS, DRC-92-31
WHEREAS, a duly verified application for a Precise Plan
was filed with the Planning Department of the City of Chula vista
on December 20, 1991 by Mr. T. David Eyres, and
WHEREAS, said application requested a precise plan
proposing construction of 14 detached, single-family dwellings with
attached two car garages on individual lots served by private
streets. The property is located between Date Street and Palm
Avenue south of Otay Valley Road in the Montgomery Planning Area,
and
""'ltEti"'t;;> ... .....:~.:.'.....l.....t.b.'...i. :.......:...'.~.-.'.'...:.:.:.:.~...'.:...,.~..i.i.i.b...i."...:~.,l.;.:.'.r.(.;.'.~..,'~.:..;,I.:,p.!.!'.).=...;,:.:.'.~.ln....'."a.fl...'..:.i.1l.~....:.'...;.~...~.'...;...a.;.....;.:...,.r...,,;.;.ti.l!.~,...>.~t.....:.:;.P...:.:.....;.....Lo.~,:.~.',:'..,b.,.....:,.:.~.:,':.,.li.I.,.....i~.....i:..=...:.:.'.,..:-.i...'.:.'....'.~.~...:.:...'.I.'.:.'.:.^......','......~,:.'.~...L.;....,!.'.:....:'.:..=.:..;...r.,i,.~..,'..'.;...n,~.;.:.~.....;....t.:=.....:.:.:.i.~.....:.....
111~~IIII'I~",.i@,";;" .... ......... ..' ...... u . .. ...... .
Illgnl'mltilll_tlll'IIII"lllll;IIIII~'I\l11l111111
WHEREAS, the City council set the time and place for a
hearing on said design review application and notice of said
hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in
a newspaper of general circulation in the city and its mailing to
property owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the
property at least ten days prior to the hearing, and
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as
advertised, namely 6:00 p.m., July 28, 1992 in the Council
Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the city Council and said
hearing was thereafter closed, and
WHEREAS, the City Council found that the project would
have no significant environmental impacts and adopted the Negative
Declaration issued on IS-92-19.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL
finds as follows:
Pursuant to section 19.14.576 of the Zoning ordinance, the
precise plan for DATE-PALM VILLAS, DRC-92-31, is found to be
in conformance with the various elements of the city's General
Plan based on the following:
J5/J-:3
Resolution No. 16731
Page 2
1. That such plan will not, under the circumstances of the
particular case, be detrimental to the health, safety or
general welfare of persons residing or working in the
vicinity, or injurious to property or improvements in the
vicinity in that the project represents a superior site
and architectural design of a presently under-improved
property.
2. That such plan satisfies the principal for the
application of the "P" modifying district as set forth in
section 19.56.041 in that the subj ect property was
rezoned with the "P" designator under the Montgomery area
rezoning program.
3 . That any exceptions granted which deviate from the
underlying zoning requirements shall be warranted only
when necessary to meet the purpose and application of the
"P" precise plan modifying district in that the reduced
lot sizes allow for an overall superior design and common
open space amenity that would otherwise not have been
incorporated as part of this project.
4. That approval of this plan will conform to the General
Plan and the adopted policies of the City as listed in
the approval of PCS-92-0l for DATE-PALM VILLAS, under the
section for Findings - Tentative Subdivision Map.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL hereby
approves the Precise Plan for DATE-PALM VILLAS, DRC-92-31, subject
to the following conditions:
1. Units #5 and #9 shall maintain a minimum 10 foot exterior
yard setback.
2. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the appl icant '
shall submit a fence design program to the Director of
Planning for review and approval.
3. All fences shall maintain a minimum 10 foot exterior side
yard setback from sidewalks and curbs.
4. The two parking stalls located at the terminus of the
main access driveways into the site and adjacent to the
common open space area shall be striped as "NO PARKING"
and shall function as turnaround areas.
5. The proposed four foot wide sidewalks along the northerly
side of the driveway access off of Date Street and the
southerly side of the driveway access off of Palm Avenue
J5/lr~
Resolution No. 16731
Page 3
shall be extended along the frontage of units #6 and #8,
respectively.
6. The building elevations for proposed exterior design
schemes and reverse models shall be revised and shall
incorporate wall projections and roof modifications per
staff sketch #1.
7. The proposed bathroom windows on the front building
elevations shall be relocated per staff sketch #1.
8. The proposed windows and doors on the left side building
elevations (scheme "A" and "B") shall be aligned per
staff sketch #1.
9. A detailed landscaping and irrigation plan shall be
submitted to the city Landscape Architect for review and
approval prior to issuance of building permits. The
landscaping plan design shall reflect an imaginative play
area design rather than a structured play structure area.
Boulder outcrops, mounding landforms and seating areas
are encouraged to be incorporated within the final
landscaping plan design. The landscape plan shall
incorporate low-water usage techniques and devices, to
the satisfaction of the Director of Planning.
That a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the
owners of the property.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
/W;j' ~
A
J)
Robert A. Leiter
Director of Planning
Bruce M. Boogaar
City Attorney
/S'/I" 7
RESOLUTION NO. I" '?.:J rP..
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING
THE TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR
DATE-PALM VILLAS, CHULA VISTA TRACT PCS-92-01
WHEREAS, a duly verified application for a tentative
subdivision map was filed with the Planning Department of the city
of Chula vista on February 13, 1992 by Mr. T. David Eyres; and
WHEREAS, said application requested a tentative
subdivision map for the project known as DATE-PALM VILLAS, Chula
vista Tract PCS-92-01, in order to subdivide the 2.12 gross or 1.98
net acres in the R-1-5P zoning district into 14 single family lots
and one common space lot; and
WHEREAS, the City Council set the time and place for a
hearing on said tentative subdivision map application and notice of
said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its
publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and
its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior
boundaries of the property at least ten days prior to the hearing;
and
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as
advertised, namely 6:00 p.m., July 28, 1992 in the Council
Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the City Council and said
hearing was thereafter closed; and
WHEREAS, the city Council found that the project would
have no significant environmental impacts and adopted the Negative
Declaration issued on IS-92-19.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL
finds as follows:
Pursuant to section 66473.5 of the Subdivision Map Act, the
tentative subdivision map for DATE-PALM VILLAS, Chula vista
Tract 92-01, is found to be in conformance with the various
elements of the City'S General Plan and the Montgomery
Specific Plan based on the following:
1. The site is physically suitable for residential
development and the proposal conforms to all standards
established by the City for such projects.
2. The design of the subdivision will not have a detrimental
affect the existing improvements -- streets, sewers, etc.
which have been designed to avoid any serious
problems.
3. The project is in substantial conformance with the Chula
vista General Plan Elements as follows:
J~13 - /
Resolution
J~ 7.:JrX
Paqe 2
a. Land Use - The project density is consistent with
the zoning adopted pursuant to the Montgomery
Specific Plan and the Chula vista General Plan's
Low/Medium Density land use designation. This
project implements Goal 3 of the Land Use Element
of the General Plan in that it:
. Encourages a diversity of housing types;
. Meets or exceeds a standard of high quality
planning and design;
. Is a planned development with a coordinated
mix of urban uses and open space; and
.
Preserves
residential
in.
and reinforces the existing
neighborhood it will be located
In addition, the project implements section 6.3 of
the General Plan in that the clustering of the
project:
. Preserves the natural landform;
. Aggregates open space within the development
for amenity and recreational purposes; and
. Enhances land use order, visual and functional
quality, and livability of the project.
The project is also in conformance with the density
specified in this section of the General Plan in
that the maximum number of dwelling units does not
exceed ten (10) dwelling units per net acre for the
Low-Medium Density range.
b. Circulation - The project design allows access to
seven units off of Date Street and to seven units
off of Palm Avenue. Because the driveways are not
joined, there is no possibility of through traffic
between Date Street and Palm Avenue. This project
implements Goal 1 of the Circulation Element of the
General Plan in that it preserves existing
neighborhood character by utilizing adopted roadway
design standards.
/5/J.,.2
Resolution
/11> 7..3 .2..
Page 3
c.
Housing
implements
Element of
The project is consistent with and
section 2.1 Goals of the Housing
General Plan in that it:
. Provides for decent housing in a well-planned
neighborhood; and
.
Helps with the systematic
rehabilitation, conservation and
of the residential neighborhood.
renewal,
improvement
d. Conservation The site is at present in a
disturbed condition. This project, once
constructed, will totally disturb the site.
However, as part of the Negative Declaration for
IS-92-19 drainage/erosion control and water
conservation are addressed.
e. Park and Recreation, Open Space - The project is
not proposing any park dedication and is not
subject to any such requirement. However, standard
park fees will be required of the developer.
f. Seismic Safety - There are no known active faults
within the vicinity. The closest potentially
active fault is located approximately two to two
and one-half miles to the west of the site.
g. Safety - The nearest fire station is three miles
away and is associated with a seven minute response
time. The Fire Department requires adequate fire
flow (1,000 gpm at 20 psi residual) and red curbs
with "NO PARKING - FIRE LANE" to their satisfaction
to eliminate access problems. On-site fire
hydrants may be required to obtain the required
fire flow.
h. Noise - Noise is not an issue for this proj ect
because of distance from it to the nearest noise
generator (Main street). Interior noise levels are
required to meet City Standards per Chapter 19.68
of the Zoning Ordinance.
i. Scenic Highway - This proj ect does not abut any
scenic highway.
j. Bicycle Routes - This project is not on a bicycle
route.
/513'3
Resolution J~ 7..3 '.;.,
Page 4
k. Public Buildings - No public buildings are proposed
on the site. The project is required to pay RCT
fees prior to the issuance of building permits.
4. The project is in substantial conformance with and
implements the Montgomery Specific Plan in that it:
a. Coordinates the development, expansion, and
conservation of the urban form of Montgomery with
the land use, circulation, public facility, and
growth management plans and programs of the city of
Chula vista.
b. Establishes and furthers circulation patterns and
traffic networks which foster public safety and
convenience, and discourages "through traffic" in
this residential area.
c. Encourages the establishment and maintenance of a
"balanced neighborhood" which is characterized by a
planned diversity of building sites and density.
d. Creates 14 new residential sites for single-family
dwellings.
Encourages home and dwelling-unit
implements imaginative residential
effort to achieve higher levels
affordability and amenity.
In addition, the project implements the objective of
replanning, and replatting Broderick's Acres in order to
improve the residential fabric of Montgomery, expand its
housing stock, and promote home and residential-site
ownership.
ownership, and
concepts in an
of livability,
e.
5. Pursuant to section 66412.2 of the Subdivision Map Act,
the Committee certifies that it has considered the effect
of this approval on the housing needs of the region and
has balanced those needs against the public service needs
of the residents of the city and the available fiscal and
environmental resources.
6. Pursuant to section 66473.1 of the SUbdivision Map Act,
the Committee has considered and determined that the
design of the subdivision provides to the extent feasible
for future passive or natural heating or cooling
opportunities.
)5l3~'I
Resolution
/~7J.2.
Page 5
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL hereby
approves the Tentative Subdivision Map for DATE-PALM VILLAS, Chula
vista Tract PCS-92-01 subject to the following conditions:
1. Any mitigation measures required by IS-92-19 are hereby
incorporated herein and shall be implemented in
accordance with requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act.
2. Prior to Final Map approval, the subdivider shall submit
proof that the project complies with the City'S threshold
standards to the satisfaction of the Director of
Planning.
3. The amount of fees applicable to the project, including
but not limited to PAD, DIF, and RCT fees, shall be those
in effect at the time of collection.
4. The subdivider shall file with the City of Chula vista a
copy of the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and
Restrictions (CC&R's) applicable to the subject property.
The CC&R's shall include:
a. provisions assuring maintenance of all private
facilities including the private streets and
drainage system. The City of Chula vista shall be
named as party to said Declaration authorizing the
city to enforce the terms and conditions of the
Declaration in the same manner as any owner within
the subdivision.
b. Prohibition of television antennas, garage
conversions, parking outside of designated areas,
parking of recreational vehicles and boat trailers.
Streets and Easements
5. The developer shall be responsible for the construction
of half width public street improvements along the full
length of the subject property on Date Street and Palm
Avenue in conformance with Chula vista Design Standard
No. 3 for a Class III Collector. Said improvements
shall include, but not be limited to asphalt concrete
pavement and base, concrete curb, gutter and sidewalk,
street lights, street trees, driveway approaches and
transitions to existing improvements as directed by the
city Engineer.
/5lJ-S
Resolution //, 7J.2..
Page 6
6. The developer shall notify the City at least 60 days
prior to consideration of the Final Map by city if off
site right-of-way cannot be obtained as required by the
Conditions of Approval. (Only off site right-of-way or
easements affected by section 66462.5 of the Subdivision
Map Act are covered by this condition).
After said notification, the owner shall:
a. Pay the full cost of acquiring off site right-of-
way or easements required by the Conditions of the
Tentative Map.
b.
Deposit with the City the
acquiring said right-of-way
estimate to be approved by the
estimated cost
easements.
City Engineer.
of
Said
c. Have all easement and/or right-of-way documents and
plats prepared and appraisals complete which are
necessary to commence condemnation proceedings.
d. If the developer so requests, the City may use its
powers to acquire right-of-way, easements or
licenses needed for off site improvements or work
related to the Tentative Map. The developer shall
pay all costs, both direct and indirect incurred in
said acquisition.
The requirements of a, band c above shall be
accomplished prior to the approval of the Final Map.
All off site requirements which fall under the purview of
section 66462.5 of the State Subdivision Map Act will be
waived if the city does not comply with the 120 day time
limitation specified in that section of the act.
7. The developer shall grant a 5.5 foot wide landscape
buffer area easement along Date Street and Palm Avenue in
accordance with the street Design standards for a Class
III Collector street prior to Final Map approval.
8. The developer shall dedicate additional right-of-way
along Date street and Palm Avenue necessary to provide a
half-street width of 30' from center line to property
line prior to Final Map approval. The developer shall
obtain all off-site right-of-way necessary for the
installation of drainage improvements and transitions to
the existing improvements on Date street and Palm Avenue.
/5lJ-~
Resolution
J~ 73;;"
Page 7
9. The private drives shall be constructed of Portland
cement concrete and designed in accordance with City
standards.
10. Private drives A-D shall be designated as general access
easements and parking areas within the subdivision shall
be designated as common parking spaces on the final map
for the subdivision.
Improvement plans for the construction of said private
drives shall be submitted and approved by the city
Engineer prior to Final Map approval.
Sewers
11. All sewers within the subdivision shall be private.
Sewer manholes shall be constructed at connection of
private sewers to public sewers on Date Street and Palm
Avenue or as determined by the City Engineer upon review
of improvement plans.
Gradina and Drainaae
12. The applicant shall provide to the City prior to approval
of the final map a drainage study prepared by a civil
engineer which includes the following:
a. Methods to reduce the 100-year frequency runoff
from the site to a level equal to or less than the
current runoff.
b. An analysis of impacts to downstream properties
and/or streets to the point that flows enter a
public storm drain.
c. A recommendation as to improvements necessary to
reduce impacts from this project.
13. The developer shall provide improvements indicated in the
drainage study. The study shall be approved by the city
Engineer and any necessary improvements included in the
improvement and/or grading plans prior to final map
approval.
14. An erosion and sedimentation control plan shall be
prepared as part of the grading plans.
Jfe-?
Resolution )6 7 .3 J...
Page 8
Aqreements
15. The developer shall permit all franchised cable
television companies ("Cable Company") equal opportunity
to place conduit and provide cable television service to
each lot within the subdivision. However, developer
shall restrict access to the conduit to only those
franchised cable television companies who are and remain
in compliance with all of the terms and conditions of the
franchise and which are in further compliance with all
other rules, requlations, ordinances and procedures
requlating and affecting the operation of cable
television companies as same may have been, or may from
time to time be issued by the city of Chula vista.
The developer shall enter into an agreement with the city
to insure that compliance with this condition is met
prior to approval of the final map.
16. On the condition that the City shall promptly notify the
subdivider of any claim, action or proceeding and on the
further condition that the City fully cooperates in the
defense, the subdivider/applicant shall enter into an
agreement to, defend, indemnify and hold harmless the
City and its agents, officers and employees, from any
claim, action or proceeding against the city, or its
agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void
or annul any approval by the City, including approval by
its Planning Commission, City Councilor any approval by
its agents, officers, or employees with regard to this
subdivision.
17. The developer shall enter into an agreement with the City
wherein he holds the city harmless from any liability for
erosion, siltation, or increased flow of drainage
resulting from this project.
Miscellaneous
18. The boundary of the subdivision shall be tied to the
California Coordinate System - Zone VI or as determined
by the City Engineer.
19. The developer shall comply with all relevant Federal,
State and Local regulations, including the Clean Water
Act. The developer shall be responsible for providing
all required testing and documentation to demonstrate
said compliance as required by the City Engineer.
/58-8'
Resolution
1I,73J..
Paqe 9
20. The developer shall provide the City with the Final Map
in a diqital format such as (DXF) graphic file. This
Computer Aided Design (CAD) copy of the Final Map shall
be based on accurate coordinate geometry calculations and
shall be submitted in duplicate on 5 1/2" HD floppy disk
prior to Final Map approval.
21. The developer shall comply with all applicable sections
of the Chula vista Municipal Code. Preparation of the
Final Map and all plans shall be in accordance with the
provisions of the Subdivision Map Act and the city of
Chula vista Subdivision Ordinance and Subdivision Manual.
22. The developer shall comply with all applicable sections
of the Chula vista Municipal Code. Preparation of the
Final Map and all plans shall be in accordance with the
provisions of the Subdivision Map Act and the City of
Chula vista Subdivision Ordinance and Subdivision Manual.
23. The following are code requirements:
a. Prior to the issuance of any building permit:
i. The developer shall pay Public Facilities
Development Impact Fees. The amount of said
fees to be paid shall be that in effect at the
time of issuance of building permits.
ii.
The developer shall
Participation Fees in
Council Policy.
iii. The developer shall pay all applicable sewer
fees, including but not limited to Sewer
Connection Fees.
pay Traffic Signal
accordance with City
b. The developer shall pay school fees prior to the
issuance of any building permit.
c. The developer shall install fire hydrants of a type
and at locations approved by the Chula vista Fire
Department which shall have a fire flow of 1,000
gpm at 20 psi residual. Red curbs with "NO PARKING
FIRE LANE" shall also be installed to the
satisfaction of the Fire Department.
That a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the
owners of the property.
).5lJ,9
Resolution /~ ~-1~
Page 10
Presented by
Approved as to form by
Robert A. Leiter
Director of Planning
~
Bruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
/.5'13-/0
Revised to Include Dates of Planning commission
and Montgomery Planning committee Actions
Marked with IEDnINE to Show Added Paragraphs
""""""""""""""",,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, Item No. 15b
Agenda: July 28, 1992
RESOLUTION NO. 16732
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING
THE TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR
DATE-PALM VILLAS, CHULA VISTA TRACT PCS-92-01
WHEREAS, a duly verified application for a tentative
subdivision map was filed with the Planning Department of the City
of Chula vista on February 13, 1992 by Mr. T. David Eyres; and
WHEREAS, said application requested a tentative
subdivision map for the project known as DATE-PALM VILLAS, Chula
vista Tract PCS-92-01, in order to subdivide the 2.12 gross or 1.98
net acres in the R-1-5P zoning district into 14 single family lots
and one common space lot; and
Illgft~If~91_11I1t""lllllllllllllilllilllill'i;1111
;.:';:;"::.;::::;:::
WHEREAS, the City Council set the time and place for a
hearing on said tentative subdivision map application and notice of
said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its
publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and
its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior
boundaries of the property at least ten days prior to the hearing;
and
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as
advertised, namely 6:00 p.m., July 28, 1992 in the Council
Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the city Council and said
hearing was thereafter closed; and
WHEREAS, the City Council found that the project would
have no significant environmental impacts and adopted the Negative
Declaration issued on IS-92-19.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL
finds as follows:
Pursuant to section 66473.5 of the Subdivision Map Act, the
tentative subdivision map for DATE-PALM VILLAS, Chula vista
Tract 92-01, is found to be in conformance with the various
156-1/
Resolution No. 16732
Page 2
elements of the city's General Plan and the Montgomery
Specific Plan based on the following:
1. The site is physically suitable for residential
development and the proposal conforms to all standards
established by the city for such projects.
2. The design of the subdivision will not have a detrimental
affect the existing improvements -- streets, sewers, etc.
which have been designed to avoid any serious
problems.
3. The project is in substantial conformance with the Chula
vista General Plan Elements as follows:
a. Land Use - The project density is consistent with
the zoning adopted pursuant to the Montgomery
Specific Plan and the Chula vista General Plan I s
Low/Medium Density land use designation. This
project implements Goal 3 of the Land Use Element
of the General Plan in that it:
. Encourages a diversity of housing types;
. Meets or exceeds a standard of high quality
planning and design;
. Is a planned development with a coordinated
mix of urban uses and open space; and
.
Preserves
residential
in.
and reinforces the existing
neighborhood it will be located
In addition, the project implements section 6.3 of
the General Plan in that the clustering of the
project:
. Preserves the natural landform;
. Aggregates open space within the development
for amenity and recreational purposes; and
. Enhances land use order, visual and functional
quality, and livability of the project.
The project is also in conformance with the density
specified in this section of the General Plan in
that the maximum number of dwelling units does not
/~[J -/c2,
Resolution No. 16732
Paqe 3
exceed ten (10) dwelling units per net acre for the
Low-Medium Density range.
b. Circulation - The project design allows access to
seven units off of Date street and to seven units
off of Palm Avenue. Because the driveways are not
joined, there is no possibility of through traffic
between Date street and Palm Avenue. This project
implements Goal 1 of the Circulation Element of the
General Plan in that it preserves existing
neighborhood character by utilizing adopted roadway
design standards.
c.
Housing
implements
Element of
The project is consistent with and
section 2.1 Goals of the Housing
General Plan in that it:
. Provides for decent housing in a well-planned
neighborhood; and
.
Helps with the systematic
rehabilitation, conservation and
of the residential neighborhood.
renewal,
improvement
d. Conservation The site is at present in a
disturbed condition. This project, once
constructed, will totally disturb the site.
However, as part of the Negative Declaration for
IS-92-19 drainage/erosion control and water
conservation are addressed.
e. Park and Recreation, Open Space - The project is
not proposing any park dedication and is not
subject to any such requirement. However, standard
park fees will be required of the developer.
f. Seismic Safety - There are no known active faults
within the vicinity. The closest potentially
active fault is located approximately two to two
and one-half miles to the west of the site.
g. Safety - The nearest fire station is three miles
away and is associated with a seven minute response
time. The Fire Department requires adequate fire
flow (1,000 gpm at 20 psi residual) and red curbs
with "NO PARKING - FIRE LANE" to their satisfaction
to eliminate access problems. On-site fire
hydrants may be required to obtain the required
fire flow.
/~!3~J;
Resolution No. 16732
Page ..
h. Noise - Noise is not an issue for this proj ect
because of distance from it to the nearest noise
generator (Main Street). Interior noise levels are
required to meet City standards per Chapter 19.68
of the Zoning Ordinance.
i. Scenic Highway - This project does not abut any
scenic highway.
j. Bicycle Routes - This project is not on a bicycle
route.
k. Public Buildings - No public buildings are proposed
on the site. The project is required to pay RCT
fees prior to the issuance of building permits.
4. The proj ect is in substantial conformance wi th and
implements the Montgomery Specific Plan in that it:
a. Coordinates the development, expansion, and
conservation of the urban form of Montgomery with
the land use, circulation, public facility, and
growth management plans and programs of the City of
Chula vista.
b. Establishes and furthers circulation patterns and
traffic networks which foster public safety and
convenience, and discourages "through traffic" in
this residential area.
c. Encourages the establishment and maintenance of a
"balanced neighborhood" which is characterized by a
planned diversity of building sites and density.
d. Creates 14 new residential sites for single-family
dwellings.
e. Encourages home and dwelling-unit ownership, and
implements imaginative residential concepts in an
effort to achieve higher levels of livability,
affordability and amenity.
In addition, the project implements the objective of
replanning, and replatting Broderick's Acres in order to
improve the residential fabric of Montgomery, expand its
housing stock, and promote home and residential-site
ownership.
/513//1
Resolution No. 16732
Paqe 5
5. Pursuant to section 66412.2 of the Subdivision Map Act,
the Committee certifies that it has considered the effect
of this approval on the housinq needs of the region and
has balanced those needs against the public service needs
of the residents of the City and the available fiscal and
environmental resources.
6. Pursuant to section 66473.1 of the Subdivision Map Act,
the Committee has considered and determined that the
design of the subdivision provides to the extent feasible
for future passive or natural heating or cooling
opportunities.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL hereby
approves the Tentative Subdivision Map for DATE-PALM VILLAS, Chula
vista Tract PCS-92-01 subject to the following conditions:
1. Any mitigation measures required by IS-92-19 are hereby
incorporated herein and shall be implemented in
accordance with requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act.
2. Prior to Final Map approval, the subdivider shall submit
proof that the project complies with the City's threshold
standards to the satisfaction of the Director of
Planning.
3. The amount of fees applicable to the project, including
but not limited to PAD, DIF, and RCT fees, shall be those
in effect at the time of collection.
4. The subdivider shall file with the City of Chula vista a
copy of the Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and
Restrictions (CC&R' s) applicable to the subject property.
The CC&R's shall include:
a. provisions assuring maintenance of all private
facilities including the private streets and
drainage system. The city of Chula vista shall be
named as party to said Declaration authorizing the
ci ty to enforce the terms and conditions of the
Declaration in the same manner as any owner within
the subdivision.
b. Prohibition of television antennas, garage
conversions, parking outside of designated areas,
parking of recreational vehicles and boat trailers.
/50 ~ /5
Resolution No. 16732
Page 6
streets and Easements
5. The developer shall be responsible for the construction
of half width public street improvements along the full
length of the subject property on Date street and Palm
Avenue in conformance with Chula vista Design standard
No. 3 for a Class III Collector. Said improvements
shall include, but not be limited to asphalt concrete
pavement and base, concrete curb, gutter and sidewalk,
street lights, street trees, driveway approaches and
transitions to existing improvements as directed by the
City Engineer.
6. The developer shall notify the City at least 60 days
prior to consideration of the Final Map by City if off
site right-of-way cannot be obtained as required by the
Conditions of Approval. (Only off site right-of-way or
easements affected by section 66462.5 of the Subdivision
Map Act are covered by this condition).
After said notification, the owner shall:
a. Pay the full cost of acquiring off site right-of-
way or easements required by the Conditions of the
Tentative Map.
b.
Deposit with the city the
acquiring said right-of-way
estimate to be approved by the
estimated cost
easements.
City Engineer.
of
Said
c. Have all easement and/or right-of-way documents and
plats prepared and appraisals complete which are
necessary to commence condemnation proceedings.
d. If the developer so requests, the City may use its
powers to acquire right-of-way, easements or
licenses needed for off site improvements or work
related to the Tentative Map. The developer shall
pay all costs, both direct and indirect incurred in
said acquisition.
The requirements of a, band c above shall be
accomplished prior to the approval of the Final Map.
All off site requirements which fall under the purview of
section 66462.5 of the state Subdivision Map Act will be
waived if the City does not comply with the 120 day time
limitation specified in that section of the act.
/S/3" I~
Resolution No. 16732
Page 7
7. The developer shall grant a 5.5 foot wide landscape
buffer area easement along Date street and Palm Avenue in
accordance with the street Design standards for a Class
III Collector street prior to Final Map approval.
8. The developer shall dedicate additional right-of-way
along Date street and Palm Avenue necessary to provide a
half-street width of 30' from center line to property
line prior to Final Map approval. The developer shall
obtain all off-site right-of-way necessary for the
installation of drainage improvements and transitions to
the existing improvements on Date street and Palm Avenue.
9. The private drives shall be constructed of Portland
cement concrete and designed in accordance with City
standards.
10. Private drives A-D shall be designated as general access
easements and parking areas within the subdivision shall
be designated as common parking spaces on the final map
for the subdivision.
Improvement plans for the construction of said private
drives shall be submitted and approved by the City
Engineer prior to Final Map approval.
Sewers
11. All sewers within the subdivision shall be private.
Sewer manholes shall be constructed at connection of
private sewers to public sewers on Date Street and Palm
Avenue or as determined by the City Engineer upon review
of improvement plans.
Gradinq and Drainaqe
12. The applicant shall provide to the City prior to approval
of the final map a drainage study prepared by a civil
engineer which includes the following:
a. Methods to reduce the 100-year frequency runoff
from the site to a level equal to or less than the
current runoff.
b. An analysis of impacts to downstream properties
and/or streets to the point that flows enter a
public storm drain.
J.5[J//7
Resolution No. 16732
Page 8
c. A recommendation as to improvements necessary to
reduce impacts from this project.
13. The developer shall provide improvements indicated in the
drainage study. The study shall be approved by the City
Engineer and any necessary improvements included in the
improvement and/or grading plans prior to final map
approval.
14. An erosion and sedimentation control plan shall be
prepared as part of the grading plans.
Aqreements
15. The developer shall permit all franchised cable
television companies ("Cable Company") equal opportunity
to place conduit and provide cable television service to
each lot within the subdivision. However, developer
shall restrict access to the conduit to only those
franchised cable television companies who are and remain
in compliance with all of the terms and conditions of the
franchise and which are in further compliance with all
other rules, regulations, ordinances and procedures
regulating and affecting the operation of cable
television companies as same may have been, or may from
time to time be issued by the City of Chula vista.
The developer shall enter into an agreement with the city
to insure that compliance with this condition is met
prior to approval of the final map.
16. On the condition that the City shall promptly notify the
subdivider of any claim, action or proceeding and on the
further condition that the City fully cooperates in the
defense, the subdivider/applicant shall enter into an
agreement to, defend, indemnify and hold harmless the
City and its agents, officers and employees, from any
claim, action or proceeding against the City, or its
agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void
or annul any approval by the City, including approval by
its Planning Commission, City Councilor any approval by
its agents, officers, or employees with regard to this
subdivision.
17. The developer shall enter into an agreement with the City
wherein he holds the City harmless from any liability for
erosion, siltation, or increased flow of drainage
resulting from this project.
J5!3~rl
Resolution No. 16732
Page 9
Miscellaneous
18. The boundary of the subdivision shall be tied to the
California Coordinate System - Zone VI or as determined
by the City Engineer.
19. The developer shall comply with all relevant Federal,
State and Local regulations, including the Clean Water
Act. The developer shall be responsible for providing
all required testing and documentation to demonstrate
said compliance as required by the City Engineer.
20. The developer shall provide the City with the Final Map
in a digital format such as (DXF) graphic file. This
Computer Aided Design (CAD) copy of the Final Map shall
be based on accurate coordinate geometry calculations and
shall be submitted in duplicate on 5 1/2" HD floppy disk
prior to Final Map approval.
21. The developer shall comply with all applicable sections
of the Chula vista Municipal Code. Preparation of the
Final Map and all plans shall be in accordance with the
provisions of the Subdivision Map Act and the City of
Chula vista Subdivision Ordinance and Subdivision Manual.
22. The developer shall comply with all applicable sections
of the Chula vista Municipal Code. Preparation of the
Final Map and all plans shall be in accordance with the
provisions of the Subdivision Map Act and the City of
Chula vista Subdivision Ordinance and Subdivision Manual.
23. The following are code requirements:
a. Prior to the issuance of any building permit:
i. The developer shall pay Public Facilities
Development Impact Fees. The amount of said
fees to be paid shall be that in effect at the
time of issuance of building permits.
i1. The developer shall pay Traffic Signal
Participation Fees in accordance with city
Council Policy.
iii. The developer shall pay all applicable sewer
fees, including but not limited to Sewer
Connection Fees.
/5/J//;
Resolution No. 16732
Page 10
b. The developer shall pay school fees prior to the
issuance of any building permit.
c. The developer shall install fire hydrants of a type
and at locations approved by the Chula vista Fire
Department which shall have a fire flow of 1,000
gpm at 20 psi residual. Red curbs with "NO PARKING
FIRE LANE" shall also be installed to the
satisfaction of the Fire Department.
That a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the
owners of the property.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
UfdLL-
~
.J)
Robert A. Leiter
Director of Planning
Bruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
/5/3/-2'0
...l': I'.,l "'-I-:"" \ /./ I.. lL ..... .., ~- ....L. ,... -.
:.~\S
.
~-:-J-f H" . ~jr ~~ I ~ ir\..\C,~ ~ ~.: "
I , ..... rL TY . ~ N
. 4 I T \ r ^.......... 1 '/ 1::-' I
~,)1 i:. V J . Ee ~ ~~~
~. ~~
. 'I J \ C4. ,-J,\ ....
~ I' I \. III TTh1\\--
. MAIN IT "OlO
. ~ E3).."T J I'
. tBmm. SHE' .~~. 3
tBffi~ ~ ~ s
~'~ ~~ ~
t- ; 'lIffiffi..1 E8 ~I' ~e
~ c ;83 83.7)
I ...",,' I mi' T ES FE
u~ \:! h.S ."" ~ ~ B3 m e
..t~ I.d ';(~~ 2:'- ~ I~ tB ffi C El3 83 tJ:j 8~ EB .,
.. i;:' l.t I'l:\::;;mm~ 83 s;: 83 ... EEl
1.r4 ~~~ f- 'On ittl tt1 ttt ~ s: ~ ~
...... AIL \ ~ _ I::E ~ tB)fS 1=8 \
I ".
l ~ CIT'
Lo .V" ,
'" ~ -
'-- I I
1 r-
_.
- -
I . I
I~
~
"""--J'--
-
--I
-
..:
II>
~
831
EB
--.-
-
OF
I
i
i
. I
PPOJI~V-r
l,.tq :t I C+l
.
I~
I
." ,".,~
",,""
..,.,.""
/'
/'
I
.~
- .
--- .
.--
--
...
----
---
-
..01
..
( PATe.P~~ VI~
. ~~(, r~ Ave.
4co' r P/~-~2." 01
) t . j
LOCATOR.
~INt~ fW-(ILX p.e,:1~~
1 P.U.D. (14 U~IT"~)' /b'2f02:~
.
,-
.-
o I I' ~ :
I ' ,'I I', I . ~:"'I
t. ...
,. l' '0." I I'" '"
'. '~ . " ' , . , .,
J' . !:! !.! '\ l 't I:jll , "i"
" t!! I: il I t Ii'~ I I ' ,- ii.~; I .1 1&, ,f .t!
I' Iii:!;; I, i~ i; Ii t, I I ~ '1lIi : ii" 1 I" '
~i:i li:iiii I: ~ lli ~ I "Il I" !,'I: 1.11 ,II' IIII
~,. "11" " ." I , , . . ,
~.l: 1'1',1:: II' ! 'Ill, Ii! !ll. ~:II'llll I, ,iI .. d
. '<!I: I,i; 1'1 i!l ;111: 11.1 ,!II', : II I' !l ! II "
' '" I", "< . II , I' -, ,', . I. .
I "H'!l 'l!i~l! '! II .I!; i, ',I, '! II 'I!!II II . i ,11111,1,
~ !:!~:I: Iil!ll,l Ii IIII II. 'I il il I i I ';1; . I . 0 0 0 .
i II:II',! :I~li; 'Ill! I I! i! .. 0'.. .
I '1' 1 i 1,11.1 , . .
I ~ 1101 .; .
al". .
. .
~
i
.~
i
.
~~
-JI-
::it..>
>~
~fE
-J
~~
I~
~
3g
.'
cs
I
~
r:~ f>
rJ 0,,,
..' : ll't
t . . .
. j ,.~ l
~ . ,.~-
"~+i!i~;" ~'
It I:" II",
Ii .... ..~
.. ;', ~
I,.
\:
.
ii
;
.
~
=
, ~
I
s
i
"\
.
,
.
,-
~
. I'
i iil~. J
I I~l II
J i'~iU ,
7.
I
, I I I
',Iiil :
Ill. . .
. ,
I!M,
,1"1.
'~i'ri
hat.
'111~I'
~'l '.
, 'I
!ij'I:=
sll.:.
.
.
". i
.t .
~;li! II!
*ll.. ~
~
I
I
I
~ 1: I
~ ! "
I .
.-1 ._f
! III hi
I Ii 'II
\~.., "'11 ii
'-,~~ I I'!:'i-I
it Il.lJi
IE. .. .
' ......
\" e8.eeee
\
\
/5'6- ~.;2
..i=J '
~
\
.
r
i
w
,
w
i
.
-
o
I
~
(./).
5~
~
~~
-.If-:
~
~
I~
~s;
8<:t
~
U
.
,
u,,'" tit,
-&1
- ..tt
..-
,,,-
-.-
--,_.
. '
,.----
-_-:
.."...--."-
"*'r '
-'
1""---
I
L___
r
H'"
.lo.!
\
,
\
,
\
,
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
,
'.
~
Q
..........
---
),
I ~~ ~ ",~
._~___L
~ ,--
~ t1 /
~ l
-. '
, '
...~'
,...... I-
~~
'.
--.~~..."-,,..
~.lJ: .!;
,
,
/
,
r---~'-
if' '
L _. ~ ,"
----f/
r----
IN "
"'I" "
\I "
~ 0 "
O~ ,t!-
..J -,;r---'
,.'
,
,
, .
7-------
,
-
.
~
~
ll!
Ie .....
"
,/
@i
"
N
\ ,I"'"
.'
>-
:3
--.,
I
__oJ
r--- ,
L "
- -'
-,.,-V"
)I
__ L.
,'. --
,
I
,-
7~~-=----
, ,--
L___ 1 -
,....., .
,/ L_
'_J
,
1'''''-
"'L.= --" ,.-.-:
~--
-
---
/~,.,:.~
--- -~
r ....- '''1! ~II:''' 1~"'%2l
_ NII'III..W I.~,r~
_M~.' ."'3
;
.
l
. .
. .
. .
'.
-
)5tJ--;2~
,3
<
.
Of'..
'.'
.~:...:: :'~;,".r;,:,~"~.~\"l'~ "'
. . ....'.
~...~~,.~'.. :-1.
,0,.......
'"
,:.".
..."
..:
, ~
.'.
," ;
"
., .
J
:~~';'
...~:
. ..
. .~. ..;
-..... .
'.,
;~~.f::-::t.
. ,1',~
" '," ..'
'.....
.';"<.J~.I
.,::.:.,.
",',:
,..., ..
'.'
o~
", ':~l; ~..' .....,. . ..~.":~ ,:'.':'~ t.~,...:.
.....1.. , ". ,.... 7.,..f' " ,:',
::,!,. .~~ .I~;.:.~..""~t~.~~..~'~~:~:~:.".~
" ,!,..
. .
-rill
'J,_'_
C2J ;. ....
3..
,
..::
... ;; .....; ','
---~......~
.
':i
!:...oi....:':.
':
..
...{ c
,
~.' "
SO ~
"
.'
~
~
:r:
o
I-
W
~
V)
~
.
u..
u..
<
l-
V)
." ':", :.:....t..\ J:r
,"'0E i~1
- :::0 :{'!
'. . - ',.'
"lJ) .:,'
:'" ,,''''0
~'~':,'::'I
. .J:.' f
," OJ',
.<D '.r'
''''- ",:'
'. ~'. 1&1
I ..~.O: . .~~'~ ::I:
. ... ........
; t..~_~.,. i
'.' .. . I..' .~~.;N;':;:
.... & .' '0 j ~.-'<\: .'J~i" 0
~~:r;.:~~' ;:1 ~ ~~:.t~....'~.~~:: ..;
. .,;..... I . .,..",~\",.:,
. ..:. . ~ . ~ . I II I '.',';.. ~, ,..,:
!i";"~;'.;;,.." .,.:"" .: ',' I '.::;,'f~~'~I~ i
..;...1.'"'.',....'.~.. ~.'i4." I, t. . 4,.".~...~.:../
~ . ~~..r f: .-~~..l"'.'. . I '''F-'~'fL'~''!;,,'''J
,; !o.......".....':! ".~,,;.."\~..... ~... '~"'.."'\..
. .-.... , .' ,.',", '~... ..". ,. .~,
..,,=-'. ,,:~~,,\'''''''';'; ~ ',.. ..':~~,...'..r.
'","',' ;-:...':-.....,.. :.j,' .. ..,.,....!f',J '"
z.~ .:",;,.:.' ,..."';~"~ .~',,:' ",~.:~"':J....1t It
.. ......'!' ..'..j.~.. i.,. . . .: ~ ~ I I, ',. ....~_ ~\.. C
~.I':......... ;.t~,.-:' .. . .?~:-"~.:.c:."
....... "':"lo~......J'" ~.' I' ....~_ ...,..
. ~.":'....... . .',. .,''''..... .,'. 'c,,"' .III" 5
t. .... '. ...-...~.c.. " ... ." t -. .......'01
I..~..f\. "~~:':.\ ..~.:,..::..~.,. ~I\.:'"~''.'-;.,,~-~\;:;,'l''I'''
:. ...~...... ~....~'C .,,:. "04(,._ .'. .i':, . ..",~~.. ~r!'.Io~.I ..~l ...;~
"'.4' ............ .....-...... v' .~.~ ,'-"'" r,.""...'fi....~
...,....:.; .;h..e,..l,..... f..to.. .....~....:~... v':' .,.1'",:,1'::),,"" ,'~
......... ;. .....~.. .........-,........ ."l~...,....-......:.,....-...... ~ W
~!'''' ~..~~~....;.. ,~.i:f.:f.~.~,....,.t.~.:'::,~~..~~~~.o.;a.~f.;.:~.....~.~ ~;;..;.Jl .
I
.
!
~I
I,
'iL! ~
~ ';
'.1/l
. ..~.~;.
~:.t: I
:'~'I
.*Ji.!;!e
".~,r:r;.
~., -0:..,
:.~~?/ I
.~:~~~y u
..,....._,.
.~:,...
~~~\ ~ !
'fi!:*(i,~ . i
J,.....~!
.....,.,~.
. ...........
~,'. .' .~~i~ e!i
.... .:~ .~.. I. !t~~~
_.~~~.~;~~;:. '.~:!.: ~ -.:~4.~::~t"z~.,:.""~...~:~
, '
"
0,. .: ..~ ...,;. .,..; \' ',;.~...... ,.... ...
;. :~J~.:::.~~':",t;~ .~..r;:...~;): 57. .
.... ..... ..... ..; .. , ...., IJ
.'. ...f" "~"::~~":" .~.. ~ ,;. :'~.J 1/1
'. '.. .. .... :., f'I"
. ..:.., . I"
. l:"
", "', '. ::'.:::.. \:,.:t:!:'I:
. .,.. '.' I,. '. ".. I G".
'. ." ... ....... I, II'"
. . ~ .\;'; ... ..;:" . .~..., I' I~; .1
:I'::">i}::' :\' ,. ;:'!ji;ll:i!i~
~ ....}, - I ~
: _".}{~\ I
....... .
: I- '''1''1: i:;..j':, ::
Z . ..:..,-,
00:'. Q 0':-",
It . --'~
DITI ':. <J ~<
DB.' -f:~.) (.,-i~.~~.~~;i:-.:,...,i..
." ':~'. '.' '-.01 . ..
. . , . .... ...-..:.
I Dl::~\ , ':l{i/,::::,n _/ ~?i\~:i I
.,:.:.' /~ to \ ':..
::::,,\ .:L ~ ~, : ~!
!':.:)~ ."!';,.. .. ...'1..........
~..,!.i, "!'~~;' .'.,!,.;.~ ~_~._.,~~:~....~~.~..:~:.J:....
:q,
.~
:"~':~ ~.
. "
......-.
~ ": :"..
~ ~ ~ ":;
'P. .. .
'f ~.~
,'..' .:',
':.'t~,.......
~'7
.. '
a:
<
~
I
: : '.> ....t.
. .....
. : .~...':::.,.
.~':f~:~.
. .;-':\":
~ ',!-, .t:
;:.~:..
..~1.
'.:..&.:.r.
'~&j'.t. ~..;
..,r..
..~-;~~:;/
",4_"
.....J.
."
::-.:. '..~~;
....:'.
..,'..;",:,.,
~'=~':'~ .;
';'.' .
. "
.,';.' .,.
. ;' :.'~"j.'!"
, "
..
-....:;..~..
..:~ '~:.~;'.~
.,'""..'!.~~..-:~,..r...
..7..}:....";.. ':'
f'b'j, - .
[EJ
.~~:i~.~:
" -.
. "
.o.t,-'
l.....
~ . ,
.. .
.:.' .
.
.
.
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
PROJECT NAME: Date-Palm Villas
PROJECT LOCATION: 256 Palm Avenue and 259-261 Date Street (between Palm and
Date)
ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 624-054-09, 624-054-17
PROJECT APPLICANT: Date-Palm Villas (T. David Eyres)
4045 Bonita Road .110
Bonita, CA 91902
CASE NO: IS-9~-19
DATE: January 28, 1992
A. Profect Settina
The project site is partially developed with three residences: two
2-bedroom 1,000 sq. ft., and one 2-bedroom 700 sq. ft. The majority of
the site is vacant, and highly disturbed as it is located amidst
surrounding residential development.
Proiect Descriotion
B.
The project proposes development of 14 single family residences over 2.12
acres, or an average density of 6.6 dwelling units per acre (du/ac). All
of the units will be 3-bedroom and 2 stories in 1388 sq. ft. On site
park ing spaces will cons i st of 28 res idence spaces and 26 to 32 guest
spaces (depending on on-street parking provided). Each residence would
have a 15 ft. private rear yard, and a common fenced play area is located
in the center of the site.
C.
Comoatibilitv with Zonina and Plans
The project density is at the high end of the allowable density (3-6
du/ac) as stated by both the General Plan and the Montgomery Specific
Phn. The project appears to be compatible with the zone which allows
single-family residential development on 5,000 sq. ft. lots with a
precise plan.
D. Comoliance with the Threshold/Standards Policy
1. Fire/EMS
The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that fire and medical units
must be able to respond to calls within 7 minutes or less in 85% of
the cases and within 5 minutes or less in 75% of the cases. The
City of Chula Vista has indicated that this threshold standard will
be met, since the nearest fire station it 3 .iles away and would be
associated with a 7 minute response time. The proposed project will
comply with this Threshold Policy.
1511-023
':;S
-1-
\\111'~ ~.
. \~~ ~
~ ~ ~~~
~.'" ,..,:;i~~ J~~~'4j
~!~'&~" ,;litK.
----- ~ ~)dM,;' \ \.
. -<J2':: R- =1- ~
S!t-
"t. ..: rl
.
~
~
I I--l
I
.
.
I
.
I
.
I
I
I
I
, ~.. ,IH, '~"1;'r","..,~;'.1 ....... 1. \I . ...,~
"'\ jlI'T\' ~ft:.<(:~;~;:lk:J3(:";;' . ~ ~ 'j}^"
..-' .J..Jr .--$.;;it':.r,.,~,,';J' ,,":-,,~ ... ~..~ '~,
."~~.'!f[;] 1:1~jg:;?:~' ,~.~""?1~~ \---': ~ r.s' ~T'.\ k'A
~'~.;'~f""'~"r.:~ "1....'/ "'';'f.~';''J:-''';;_ ':::- ~ . ~ m ~ I ~
:;:~~;;:;~ :~:J/;'-!" "~ffi:;;.;;" --= .... ~ / ~ "ri I<\~
~~p-- . W:::~. 1Z.~{t. ::: 0 l V I::G :\\ ~ y~
~ ...... _ ~~~~;:l;i'il:ir;;/"7 JO~'!:. >Vi ~.......,
~ m I"~~i Y~J:~ ~ ~ ...._~ ~ ~ ~ ~~
"-V ~e~-:-~.i> ~ ~ .L:J ~~-
R= c 9:t E :~ifif~ ...< ^~ ~ ... ~.f ~::: R ~
~GE &111. ~ I'.":i~ f- ~ ~ r::, .;;l m
I I: U' . :-(.. I:: I- r- " 'I- f-111 I I IT
.... ~ '/ ::::l )j . = = :;'~ ~I- t-
t- :: ..;. f- r;... = = .;"~i.'.1:: ~ ~ :--, ~
":. ~ ~ ~I;(ll; ,
~~~ g f--'f.. ~ ~'~ ~ '~
'- ..;. ~ f.l.x~"'~ '" ~~
I I- RL/ ...JL - ,t'........ '{\ "- 'VI'?\\....
~. ~ 'T II I(.(,:<^YL
.r ( !::::,..,j I'" V"-
-;/ ,....
\ 1TT1.~
:;;~; . '': ~~~' II~~
i:i ......:. : ~ r.:::: 1Se:\ lJl ~
.--
=~~t EE e: ~ ==
~..:_'- ~iilI ..' IE ~~ ~~
..... ---. "", =E iil liB -- m'J~
I : '/// JII -~.- 5= iil iil:l!5~ fl1~~:~e
.. ...: III,' ...!.. ,'. eil'>tDeliEaIll ~
:: l U ."1- :_~.-. ei~5Eid,~
-
fill .... -Ill"
,/
V---
;.
~ ~~"""\'.~ .
...J,~~.....:.;.~.
,~i i:1 ~. ;;r-~.to!.:.
.w.JU. ""i~f~'I(I...."~~
...
~
)
p
~
~
iM
.
/11"......
s::~
r::t..l.J.J.
m I--
! I
:(1 III II
:1
00. .. II
J
-....
-
. I ',:. .
. . ~~ i! :
. . .
.......~ ",:
.......:.........~ : t-"
. .
....... . I
. .
. "
I
~,
~
-..-""
.
.
.
. .
p--
- .
-- I- _ -
-
Q)
c:
::;
;,
.r::.
(.)
-
ltl
~
IX-
----, f./"~
"'""'-<8~~~~v
1'-" "'-___
'"
----' '
--
-
c
I
.........
.....
.ill- ......__
......
.- -
/'
..
..
------
........
--
.......... ----/
it:1J I I II
~
t1H ____
i:I Ii 1"11
." .J".. ~
II ~ ~ iTi'I'
~
err
--
-
-
l\\\\\Ul.L
')..
T~
~\
_L ,JJ
m
<III
~:~'TI1 " " I " I "
nr-L.
1IIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIITTTTlII
.ft:l 111111111111
Sheet 4 of 5
J5ts~cJ-~
Southwest Recf~velopment
,~ - ""
City of Chula Vista
~~~
.1
.----..__.:" ....a' ....."1.-r..r~.~.......-.. ~-=--'"\.f"'"1..__.-.rf'.
., Ia>
.
. '. .' .. .' ;. .. -.-...... ..04. . ,.......:..
. .. , ;.,1:.,.. .t. , . ~'" ~I .:......:.'
....... .. , " .
.. - .. ., ---.
. . - lIP 'III"
. ...;.: .-.: .- .. '. ..;..;..-=-=: e -- -- -
! ..... ~ . .' -. _ _" _ -.vP'J~
. -....-..--..-- '.,~. . .' t -
.., . ~'[ urqoN ~ ""''TV. """"'d 31'110
. -
~,:. j if' II i III ~I tl ,
:. II .'.. I ~u .
I~l il,u.fn~ili ~~ :f.MI
I 'I I 1!i. '!'l · ,
: 'I~ il'!l U 'f!l, ht IJ~i.
:111' .!.IJ! It tll'llr~ i'a I~I
1l!/J:il!II,:rlill/, .~~ lf~ t1t
IwdJ~lllqljUla :~t{~~4 ~d
. VI
oct
-l
::!
>
~
..J
~
W
~
oct
0
!
.
, -...., .' '.., . '.~
..'- '.~. ~'. :~:::. ~~.J~;':;': ..?'~'. . ...~
.' (I' .....: .;,," ': .~ .
. toll -- ..
: i' I..... ';1' .~~
., . I' M
. . I'
~ !..
. .. .". t
..
,.
"
.-
t7~:'o.
~v~
d
:l~
.: ,~
-!~~
.;og... ,,#"
.'llt i&
. .;~
: U,
':'
..
.,
e_
',:
~
"
."
"
;~
'.'
',.
.::
..
.,
.'
.'
.'
..J~~
z
oct
f(
.' .:4
'., ...." . '.;:' "I' '..',.-e- J
"". .. .~.. -',' ......... '.. .
.' ('" ',. t '. .",.,,~ .
. <. 't' ....... .: .....:.. 'f
: '::' . .. -:j
~ i . ~ ~
~ f :
i ~ . y :
l1! ....; ~:-Q -
l!lH........
=I t~f '.1, ~
i3 .., '.
... ~ t,a . ' .
... ,ll\( .
. .
1.. ':
.~
" i
Ii t
f ! fl. 1
d} . ~!H~ i I ~
i~ ~ tH~~~ fc t ~ ~t
~ f~ hll~ ~l~. t ~f'
~ =~t!rlHt~~ 1,lrllHI
N~<:.~t~,.., :I~~~ ,~~
l!l3~'~n I .~H'" !H-
~ ."h. >>~ t '.' ..)i
~,:r~:h ~ , ~~~ :;:l
IljU!h! i! HE
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
j
I
I
.
. . 0".
I
I
,
.
.
.
The required fire flow is 1000 gpm at 20 psi, and a .No Parking Fire
Lane" will be required to eliminate parking problems with this
access. On - site .Ii re hydrants may be requi red to obta i n the fi re
flow.
Police
The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that police units Ilust
respond to 84'; of Priority J calls within 7 Ilinutes or less and
Ilaintain an average response time to all Priority J calls of 4.5
minutes or less. Police units must respond to 62.10,; of Priority 2
calls within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time
to all Priority 2 calls of 7 minutes or less. The proposed project
will.comply with this Threshold Policy.
Traffic
The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that all intersections must
operate at a Level of Service (LOS) "C" or better, with the
exception that Level of Service (LOS) .0" may occur during the peak
two hours of the day at signal ized intersections. Intersections
west of I-80S are not to operate at a LOS below their 1987 LOS. No
intersect ion may reach LOS "E" or "F" during the average weekday
peak hour. Intersections of arterials with freeway ramps are
exempted from this policy. The proposed project will comply with
this Threshold Policy.
Parks/Recreation
The Threshold/Standards Policy for Parks and Recreation is 3
acres/I,OOO population. The proposed project is not subject to this
requirement; standard park fees will be required of the developer.
5. Drainage
2.
3.
4.
The Threshold/Standards Pol icy requires that storm water flows and
volumes not exceed City Engineer Standards. Individual projects
will provide necessary improvements consistent with the Drainage
Haster Planes) and City Engineering Standards. The proposed project
applicant must prepare a drainage study to determine appropriate
drainage facilities. Preparation of this study and implementation
of its recolllllendations will assure compliance with this Threshold
Policy.
6. . Sewer
The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that sewage flows and
volumes shall not .exceed City Engineering Standards. Individual
projects will prOVide necessary improvements consistent with Sewer
Haster Planes) and City Engineering Standards. The proposed project
will comply with this Threshold Policy.
/5tS-d%
t-Al
g.
-2-
.
.
.
.
7. Water
The Threshold/Stlndards Policy requires that adequate storage,
treatment, and transmission facilities are constructed concurrently
with planned growth and that water quality standards are not
,jeopardized during growth and construction. The proposed project
lIust coordinate with the water district providing service to this
area to assure appropriate water infrlstructure, Ind lhus compliance
with this Threshold Policy.
E. Identification of Environmental Effects
An initial study conducted by the City of Chull Vista determined that the
proposed. project could have one or lIore significant environmental
effects. Specific lIitigation lIeasures lIust be implemented to reduce
these effects to I level of less than significant. With implementation
of these measures, preparation of an Environmental Impact Report will not
be required. This Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in
accordance with Section 15070 of the State CEQA Guidelfnes. Specific
mitigation measures have also been set forth in the Mitigation Monitoring
Program which is attached as Addendum "A".
The following impacts have been determined to be potentially significant
and are required to be mitigated to a level of less than significant. A
di scuss i on of each of these potent tally s igni ficant impacts from the
proposed projects follows.
1. Earth
Soil erosion could occur during and after site grading if rainy
conditions occur.
2. Water
a. It is unknown whether existing drainage facilities are adequate
to serve site drainage; until the information is known, the
potential for unsuitable drainage, and the potential for site
Ind off-site flooding remains I possibility.
b. New consumption of water is an incremental demand on I
regionally (cumulatively) limited resource.
Li9ht and Glare
3.
The project would produce new lfght; spotlfghts from the project
could Iffect nearby residences.
4.
'uhlir: S@rViCI!5
Provision of fire protection Ind school services would be impacted
by the service needs of 14 new residences.
FliP'
-3-
/S6--c27
Cf
.
.
F.
Mitiaation nec@ssarv to avoid sfonfficant @ffects
Specific project mitigAtion IllelSures are required to reduce potentially
significant environmental impacts identified in the initial study for
this project to a level of less than significant.
Mitigation Masures will been ..ade conditions of project approval, as
well as requirements of the attached Mitigation Monitoring Program
(Addendum "A").
1. ~arth
The required drainage plan must show both temporary (construction)
and -permanent drainage facilities, including temporary erosion
control devices.
2. Water
a. A drainage study/plan is required with recommendations for site
dra i nage. Appropriate recommendat ions must be placed on
grading plans.
b. The applicant/developer will be subject to any water
conservation requirements the City and/or water district has in
place, and the applicant will also be subject to any fee offset
program the City may have in place to ensure no new consumption
of water.
3.liaht and Glare
Project lighting must be pointed downward toward the project site.
4. Public Services
Fi re Protect i on: The Fi re Department requi res adequate fire flow
(1,000 gpm at 20 psi residual), and red curbs with "No Parking Fire
Lane" to eliminate access problems. On site fire hydrants may be
required to obtain the fire flow.
School Districts: Both districts require payment of school fees
(SO.70/S.F. Chula Vista Elementary; SO.8S/S.F. Sweetwater Union
High), and Chula Vista Elementary recommends participation in a
Community Facilities District in lieu of standard fees. .
. G. ,tnd1nas of Ins1an1ficant Imclct
.
Based on the following findings, it is determined that the project
described above will not flave a significant environmental impact and no
environmental impact report needs to be prepared.
1.
The project hIS the potential to substani1ally degrade the quality
of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below
self-sustaining levels, threaten to elillinate a plant or anillal
/~!J'JO
ID.
-1- J 1
-4-
convnunity, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered pl ant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the
major periods of ~allfornia history or prehistory.
The project area is highly disturbed and lurrounded by urbanization;
110 biological resources would be affected by the proposal. and the
potentfal for cultural resources is low.
The project has the potential to achieve short-tenn environmental
goals to the disadvantage of long-tenn environmental goals.
The project would actually achieve long tel"ll goals by developing
what is planned by the City for the lite. The lite has no
sign4ficant agricultural or ..ineral potential.
The project has possible effects which are individually limited but
cumulatively considerable. As used in the subsection, .cumulatively
considerable" means that the incremental effects of an individual
project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects
of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the
effects of probable future projects.
Incremental demand on natural resources including water would
contribute to the regional to global demand on these resources.
Adherence to standard building requirements and illplelllentatfon of
mitigation measures stated herein will IIltigate these incremental
effects to a level below significance.
The environmental effects of a project will cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly.
The proposed project has not been found to cause lubstantial direct
or indirect effects on human beings.
H. Consultation
.
.
,
.
.
2.
3.
4.
1. Jndividuals and Oraanizations
City of Chula Vista: Roger Daoust, Engineering
John Lippitt, Engineering
Cliff Swanson, Engineering
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering
Bob Sennett. Planning .
Ken Larsen, Director of Building and Housing
Carol Gove, Fire Marshal
Captain Keith Hawkins. Police Department
Shauna Stokes. Parks and Recreation Department
Diana Richardson. Community Development Dept.
(hula Vista City School District: Kate ShUTson
Sweetwater Union High School District: Tom Silva
~
/1 .
-5-
)~tJ.-- J /
.
.
.
..
Applicant's Agent: T. David Eyres
4045 Bonita Road '110
. Bonita, CA 91902
2. Doc:um@nts
Chula Vista General Plan (1989)
Chula Vista General Plan EIR (1989)
Title 19, Chula Vista Municipal Code
California Office of Planning and Research, -Hazardous Waste and
Substances Site List", November 1990
3. Jniti,l Studv
This environmental determination is based on the attached Initial
Study, any coments received on the Initial Study and any coments
received during the public review period for the Negative
Declaration. Further information regarding the environmental review
of this project is available from the Chula Vista Planning
Department, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 92010.
Initial Studv Preoaration
The Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared by Diana
Richardson, Contract EnviroQmental Facilitator, City of Chula Vista.
1~~'V7~
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COORDINATOR
EN 6 (Rev. 12/90)
WPC 4901H
j5?J ~3c2-
~Jk
I~
-6-
.
.
ATTACHMENT A
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
DATE-PALM VILLAS
In accordance with Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code, the
Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) would occur upon approval of the proposed
project. The HMP consists of defining actual mitigation actions to be taken,
1I0nitoring their implementation, defining the schedule for their occurrence,
and verifying their implementation.
The following issue areas have mitigation measures which must be implemented:
.
Earth
Water
Light and Glare
Public Services
.
The attached checklist will provide the documentation necessary for the proper
implementation of measures. The Environmental Review Coordinator (ERC) of the
City of Chula Vista has the authority to designate the Mitigation Compliance
Coordinator, who will be responsible for monitoring implementation of
measures. The ERC will also have final verification authority for the proper
implementation of measures.
.
WPC 4902H
,
.'
.
/5'tJ-- J;1
~
/3
..
"1T1"'TlON _ITOIIING ANlI .[POIITlNG C11[Cl(lIST
pIOJECT NAIt[:
In _CCOrd_nce w.th SectIon 21081.6 or the Public aesources Cod.
.
FII. No.
,
Ela 110.
Project PNse
Ela JOIp_ct Ar.. (Project Doslen; 'er.rlc_tlon or C~l.t'on
"It 'e_Uon _nd , ConslrucUon; ...pons I b Ie
N"er "'Uell ton "usure Post Construction) forty or Aeency Person DIle '-nil
.
.
..
.
~Ji
i5!J~3)
/~
.
.
.
RESOLUTION NO. DRC-92-31
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THAT
THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE PRECISE PLAN
FOR DATE-PALM VILLAS, DRC-92-31
WHEREAS, a duly verified application for a Precise Plan was filed with the
Planning Department of the City of Chula Vista on December 20, 1991 by Mr. T. David Eyres,
and
WHEREAS, said application requested a precise plan proposing construction of
14 detached, single-family dwellings with attached two car garages on individual lots served by
private streets. The property is located between Date Street and Palm Avenue south of Otay
Valley Road in the Montgomery Planning Area, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission set the time and place for a hearing on said
design review application and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its
publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and its mailing to property owners
within 500 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least ten days prior to the hearing,
and
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely 7:00
p.m., June 24, 1992 in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the City Council and
said hearing was thereafter closed, and
WHEREAS, the Commission found that the project would have no significant
environmental impacts and adopted the Negative Declaration issued on IS-92-19.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING
COMMISSION finds as follows:
Pursuant to Section 19.14.576 of the Zoning Ordinance, the precise plan for DATE-
PALM VILLAS, DRC-92-31, is found to be in conformance with the various elements
of the City's General Plan based on the following:
1. That such plan will not, under the circumstances of the particular case, be
detrimental to the health, safety or general welfare of persons residing or working
in the vicinity, or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity in that the
project represents a superior site and architectural design of a presently under-
improved property.
)5(5~J;J
/:5
.
.
.
Resolution No. DRC-92-31
June 24. 1992
paqe 2
2. That such plan satisfies the principal for the application of the "P" modifying
district as set forth in Section 19.56.041 in that the subject property was rezoned
with the "P" designator under the Montgomery area rezoning program.
3. That any exceptions granted which deviate from the underlying zoning
requirements shall be warranted only when necessary to meet the purpose and
application of the "P" precise plan modifying district in that the reduced lot sizes
allow for an overall superior design and common open space amenity that would
otherwise not have been incorporated as part of this project.
4. That approval of this plan will conform to the General Plan and the adopted
policies of the City as listed in the approval of PCS-92-01 for DATE-PALM
VILLAS, under the section for Findings - Tentative Subdivision Map.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION
recommends that the City Council approve the Precise Plan for DATE-PALM VILLAS, DRC-
92-31, subject to the following conditions:
1.
Units #5 and #9 shall maintain a minimum 10 foot exterior yard setback.
2. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit a fence design
program to the Director of Planning for review and approval.
3. AIl fences shall maintain a minimum 10 foot exterior side yard setback from
sidewalks and curbs.
4. The two parking stalls located at the terminus of the main access driveways into
the site and adjacent to the common open space area shall be striped as "NO
PARKING" and shall function as turnaround areas.
5. The proposed four foot wide sidewalks along the northerly side of the driveway
access off of Date Street and the southerly side of the driveway access off of
Palm Avenue shall be extended along the frontage of Units #6 and #8,
respectively.
6. The building elevations for proposed exterior design schemes and reverse models
shall be revised and shall incorporate wall projections and roof modifications per
staff sketch # 1.
7.
The proposed bathroom windows on the front building elevations shall be
relocated per staff sketch # 1.
J5?1~3->
I~
.
.
.
Resolution No. DRC-'2-31
June 24. 1"2
paqe 3
8. The proposed windows and doors on the left side building elevations (scheme" A"
and "B") shall be aligned per staff sketch #1.
9. A detailed landscaping and irrigation plan shall be submitted to the City
Landscape Architect for review and approval prior to issuance of building
permits. The landscaping plan design shall reflect an imaginative play area
design rather than a structured play structure area. Boulder outcrops, mounding
landforms and seating areas are encouraged to be incorporated within the final
landscaping plan design. The landscape plan shall incorporate low-water usage
techniques and devices, to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning.
That a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the owners of the property and the
City Council
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA,
CALIFORNIA, this 24th day of June, 1992 by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES:
Commissioners Carson, Fuller, Casillas, Decker, and Martin
NOES:
Commissioner Tugenberg
ABSENT:
Commissioner Tuchscher
ABSTENTIONS:
None
.'7
t/ ;;{
'~4M4/lC ~
Susan Fuller, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Nancy Ripley, Secretary
J5(s~ ;> 6
'7
.
.
.
RESOLUTION NO. PCS-92-Ql
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THAT
THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE THE TENTATIVE
SUBDMSION MAP FOR DATE-PALM VILLAS,
CHULA VISTA TRACT PCS-92-Ql
WHEREAS, a duly verified application for a tentative subdivision map was filed
with the Planning Department of the City of Chula Vista on February 13, 1992 by Mr. T. David
Eyres; and
WHEREAS, said application requested a tentative subdivision map for the project
known as DATE-PALM VILLAS, Chula Vista Tract PCS-92-01, in order to subdivide the 2.12
gross or 1.98 net acres in the R-I-5P zoning district into 14 single family lots and one common
space lot; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission set the time and place for a hearing on said
tentative subdivision map application and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was
given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and its mailing to
property owners within 300 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least ten days prior
to the hearing; and
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely 7:00
p.m., June 24, 1992 in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning
Commission and said hearing was thereafter closed; and
WHEREAS, the Commission found that the project would have no significant
environmental impacts and adopted the Negative Declaration issued on IS-92-19.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING
COMMISSION finds as follows:
Pursuant to Section 66473.5 of the Subdivision Map Act, the tentative subdivision map
for DATE-PALM VILLAS, Chula Vista Tract 92-Ql, is found to be in conformance with
the various elements of the City's General Plan and the Montgomery Specific Plan based
on the following:
1. The site is physically suitable for residential development and the proposal
conforms to all standards established by the City for such projects.
2.
The design of the subdivision will not have a detrimental affect the existing
improvements -- streets, sewers, etc. -- which have been designed to avoid any
serious problems.
)515-;17
/2
.
.
.
Resolution PCS-12-01
June 24. 1112
paqe 2
3. The project is in substantial conformance with the Chula Vista General Plan
Elements as follows:
a. Land U~ - The project density is consistent with the zoning adopted
pursuant to the Montgomery Specific Plan and the Chula Vista General
Plan's Low/Medium Density land use designation. This project
implements Goal 3 of the Land Use Element of the General Plan in that
it:
. Encourages a diversity of housing types;
. Meets or exceeds a standard of high quality planning and design;
. Is a planned development with a coordinated mix of urban uses
and open space; and
.
Preserves and reinforces the existing residential neighborhood it
will be located in.
In addition, the project implements Section 6.3 of the General Plan in that
the clustering of the project:
. Preserves the natural landform;
. Aggregates open space within the development for amenity and
recreational purposes; and
. Enhances land use order, visual and functional quality, and
livability of the project.
The project is also in conformance with the density specified in this
section of the General Plan in that the maximum number of dwelling units
does not exceed ten (10) dwelling units per net acre for the Low-Medium
Density range.
b.
Circulation - The project design allows access to seven units off of Date
Street and to seven units off of Palm Avenue. Because the driveways are
not joined, there is no possibility of through traffic between Date Street
and Palm Avenue. This project implements Goal 1 of the Circulation
Element of the General Plan in that it preserves existing neighborhood
character by utilizing adopted roadway design standards.
J5(J~3~
/7
.
.
.
Resolution PCS-92-01
June 24. 1992
paqe 3
c. Housing - The project is consistent with and implements Section 2.1 -
Goals of the Housing .Element of General Plan in that it:
. Provides for decent housing in a well-planned neighborhood; and
. Helps with the systematic renewal, rehabilitation, conservation and
improvement of the residential neighborhood.
d. Conservation - The site is at present in a disturbed condition. This
project, once constructed, will totally disturb the site. However, as part
of the Negative Declaration for IS-92-19 drainage/erosion control and
water conservation are addressed.
e. Park and Recreation, Open Space - The project is not proposing any park
dedication and is not subject to any such requirement. However, standard
park fees will be required of the developer.
f.
Seismic Safety - There are no known active faults within the vicinity. The
closest potentially active fault is located approximately two to two and
one-half miles to the west of the site.
g. Safety - The nearest fire station is three miles away and is associated with
a seven minute response time. The Fire Department requires adequate
fire flow (1,000 gpm at 20 psi residual) and red curbs with "NO
PARKING - FIRE LANE" to their satisfaction to eliminate access
problems. On-site fire hydrants may be required to obtain the required
fire flow.
h. Noise - Noise is not an issue for this project because of distance from it
to the nearest noise generator (Main Street). Interior noise levels are
required to meet City Standards per Chapter 19.68 of the Zoning
Ordinance.
i. Scenic Highway - This project does not abut any scenic highway.
j. Bicycle Routes - This project is not on a bicycle route.
k.
Public Buildings - No public buildings are proposed on the site. The
project is required to pay RCT fees prior to the issuance of building
permits.
;SfS~ 31
~l)
.
.
.
Resolution PCS-92-01
June 24. 1992
paqe 4
4. The project is in substantial conformance with and implements the Montgomery
Specific Plan in that it:
a. Coordinates the development, expansion, and conservation of the urban
form of Montgomery with the land use, circulation, public facility, and
growth management plans and programs of the City of Chula Vista.
b. Establishes and furthers circulation patterns and traffic networks which
foster public safety and convenience, and discourages "through traffic" in
this residential area.
c. Encourages the establishment and maintenance of a "balanced
neighborhood" which is characterized by a planned diversity of building
sites and density.
d. Creates 14 new residential sites for single-family dwellings.
e.
Encourages home and dwelling-unit ownership, and implements
imaginative residential concepts in an effort to achieve higher levels of
livability, affordability and amenity.
In addition, the project implements the objective of replanning, and replatting
Broderick's Acres in order to improve the residential fabric of Montgomery,
expand its housing stock, and promote home and residential-site ownership.
5. Pursuant to Section 66412.2 of the Subdivision Map Act, the Committee certifies
that it has considered the effect of this approval on the housing needs of the
region and has balanced those needs against the public service needs of the
residents of the City and the available fiscal and environmental resources.
6. Pursuant to Section 66473.1 of the Subdivision Map Act, the Committee has
considered and determined that the design of the subdivision provides to the
extent feasible for future passive or natural heating or cooling opportunities.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION
recommends that City Council approve the tentative subdivision map for DATE-PALM
VILLAS, Chula Vista Tract PCS-92-01 subject to the following conditions:
1.
Any mitigation measures required by IS-92-19 are hereby incorporated herein and
shall be implemented in accordance with requirements of the California
Environmental Quality Act.
;513- 'Zjc
~I
.
.
.
Resolution PCS-92-01
June 24. 1992
paqe 5
2. Prior to Final Map approval, the subdivider shall submit proof that the project
complies with the City's threshold standards to the satisfaction of the Director of
Planning.
3. The amount of fees applicable to the project, including but not limited to PAD,
DIP, and RCT fees, shall be those in effect at the time of collection.
4. The subdivider shall file with the City of Chula Vista a copy of the Declaration
of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's) applicable to the subject
property. The CC&R's shall include:
a. Provisions assuring maintenance of all private facilities including the
private streets and drainage system. The City of Chula Vista shall be
named as party to said Declaration authorizing the City to enforce the
terms and conditions of the Declaration in the same manner as any owner
within the subdivision.
b.
Prohibition of television antennas, garage conversions, parking outside of
designated areas, parking of recreational vehicles and boat trailers.
Streets and Easements
5. The developer shall be responsible for the construction of half width public street
improvements along the full length of the subject property on Date Street and
Palm A venue in conformance with Chula Vista Design Standard No.3 for a Class
III Collector. Said improvements shall include, but not be limited to asphalt
concrete pavement and base, concrete curb, gutter and sidewalk, street lights,
street trees, driveway approaches and transitions to existing improvements as
directed by the City Engineer.
6. The developer shall notify the City at least 60 days prior to consideration of the
Final Map by City if off site right-of-way cannot be obtained as required by the
Conditions of Approval. (Only off site right-of-way or easements affected by
Section 66462.5 of the Subdivision Map Act are covered by this condition).
After said notification, the owner shall:
a.
Pay the full cost of acquiring off site right-of-way or easements required
by the Conditions of the Tentative Map.
/5!f-'11
01;)
.
.
.
Resolution PCS-92-01
June 24. 1992
7.
paqe 6
b. Deposit with the City the estimated cost of acquiring said right-of-way
easements. Said estimate to be approved by the City Engineer.
c. Have all easement and/or right-of-way documents and plats prepared and
appraisals complete which are necessary to commence condemnation
proceedings.
d. If the developer so requests, the City may use its powers to acquire right-
of-way, easements or licenses needed for off site improvements or work
related to the Tentative Map. The developer shall pay all costs, both
direct and indirect incurred in said acquisition.
The requirements of a, b and c above shall be accomplished prior to the approval
of the Final Map.
All off site requirements which fall under the purview of Section 66462.5 of the
State Subdivision Map Act will be waived if the City does not comply with the
120 day time limitation specified in that section of the act.
The developer shall grant a 5.5 foot wide landscape buffer area easement along
Date Street and Palm Avenue in accordance with the Street Design Standards for
a Class III Collector street prior to Final Map approval.
8.
The developer shall dedicate additional right-of-way along Date Street and Palm
Avenue necessary to provide a half-street width of 30' from center line to
property line prior to Final Map approval. The developer shall obtain all off-site
right-of-way necessary for the installation of drainage improvements and
transitions to the existing improvements on Date Street and Palm Avenue.
9.
The private drives shall be constructed of Portland cement concrete and designed
in accordance with City standards.
10.
Private drives A-D shall be designated as general access easements and parking
areas within the subdivision shall be designated as common parking spaces on the
final map for the subdivision.
Improvement plans for the construction of said private drives shall be submitted
and approved by the City Engineer prior to Final Map approval.
/SIJ-J/:2
.::>3
.
.
.
Resolution PCS-92-01
June 24. 1992
Paqe 7
Sewers
11. All sewers within the subdivision shall be private. Sewer manholes shall be
constructed at connection of private sewers to public sewers on Date Street and
Palm A venue or as determined by the City Engineer upon review of improvement
plans.
Gradinl! and Draina~e
12. The applicant shall provide to the City prior to approval of the final map a
drainage study prepared by a civil engineer which includes the following:
a. Methods to reduce the 100-year frequency runoff from the site to a level
equal to or less than the current runoff.
b. An analysis of impacts to downstream properties and/or streets to the
point that flows enter a public storm drain.
c.
A recommendation as to improvements necessary to reduce impacts from
this project.
13. The developer shall provide improvements indicated in the drainage study. The
study shall be approved by the City Engineer and any necessary improvements
included in the improvement and/or grading plans prior to final map approval.
14. An erosion and sedimentation control plan shall be prepared as part of the grading
plans.
A~reements
15.
The developer shall permit all franchised cable television companies ("Cable
Company") equal opportunity to place conduit and provide cable television service
to each lot within the subdivision. However, developer shall restrict access to the
conduit to only those franchised cable television companies who are and remain
in compliance with all of the terms and conditions of the franchise and which are
in further compliance with all other rules, regulations, ordinances and procedures
regulating and affecting the operation of cable television companies as same may
have been, or may from time to time be issued by the City of Chula Vista.
The developer shall enter into an agreement with the City to insure that
compliance with this condition is met prior to approval of the fmal map.
15{J~cf3
~f
.
.
.
Resolution PCS-92-01
June 24. 1992
Paqe 8
16. On the condition that the City shall promptly notify the subdivider of any claim,
action or proceeding and on the further condition that the City fully cooperates
in the defense, the subdivider/applicant shall enter into an agreement to, defend,
indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents, officers and employees,
from any claim, action or proceeding against the City, or its agents, officers or
employees to attack, set aside, void or annul any approval by the City, including
approval by its Planning Commission, City Council or any approval by its agents,
officers, or employees with regard to this subdivision.
17. The developer shall enter into an agreement with the City wherein he holds the
City harmless from any liability for erosion, siltation, or increased flow of
drainage resulting from this project.
Miscellaneous
18. The boundary of the subdivision shall be tied to the California Coordinate System
- Zone VI or as determined by the City Engineer.
19. The developer shall comply with all relevant Federal, State and Local regulations,
including the Clean Water Act. The developer shall be responsible for providing
all required testing and documentation to demonstrate said compliance as required
by the City Engineer.
20. The developer shall provide the City with the Final Map in a digital format such
as (DXF) graphic file. This Computer Aided Design (CAD) copy of the Final
Map shall be based on accurate coordinate geometry calculations and shall be
submitted in duplicate on 5 1/2" HD floppy disk prior to Final Map approval.
21. The developer shall comply with all applicable sections of the Chula Vista
Municipal Code. Preparation of the Final Map and all plans shall be in
accordance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act and the City of Chula
Vista Subdivision Ordinance and Subdivision Manual.
22. The developer shall comply with all applicable sections of the Chula Vista
Municipal Code. Preparation of the Final Map and all plans shall be in
accordance with the provisions of the Subdivision Map Act and the City of Chula
Vista Subdivision Ordinance and Subdivision Manual.
23. The following are code requirements:
a.
Prior to the issuance of any building permit:
/5't!>~ it( cR5
.
.
.
Resolution PCS-92-01
June 24. 1992
Paqe 9
i. The developer shall pay Public Facilities Development Impact
Fees. The amount of said fees to be paid shall be that in effect at
the time of issuance of building permits.
n. The developer shall pay Traffic Signal Participation Fees in
accordance with City Council Policy.
ill. The developer shall pay all applicable sewer fees, including but not
limited to Sewer Connection Fees.
b. The developer shall pay school fees prior to the issuance of any building
permit.
c. The developer shall install fire hydrants of a type and at locations
approved by the Chula Vista Fire Department which shall have a fire flow
of 1,000 gpm at 20 psi residual. Red curbs with "NO PARKING - FIRE
LANE" shall also be installed to the satisfaction of the Fire Department.
That a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the owners of the property and the
City Council.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA,
CALIFORNIA, this 24th day of June, 1992 by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES:
Commissioners Carson, Fuller, Casillas, Decker, and Martin
NOES:
Commissioner Tugenberg
ABSENT:
Commissioner Tuchscher
ABSTENTIONS:
None
g(~~<- ~~
Susan Fuller, Chairperson
ATTEST:
Nancy Ripley, Secretary
/5/J- '/3 eR"
~
~ EXCERPT FROM MINUTE OF RESOURCE CONSERVATION C~MMISSION MEETING OF FEBRUARY 24, 1992
~
~
Resource Conservation Commission
Page 2
b. IS-92-18: Rohr F & G Street ~'l11ster Plan. Comments included the following: The
aesthetics of the area were discussed as to the height of the 90' building. There
are too many unmitigated environmental concerns including wildlife and the
vacation of part of the park on G Street. Hall feels it is not fully mitigated to
satisfaction of the Negative Declaration, and that further discussion needs to be
held with the applicant. Fox also believes an EIR should be conducted.
(Prior to Commissioner Johnson leaving, a vote was taken to approve the minutes of the
February 10, 1992 meeting. unanimous approval. Johnson left the meeting at 6:57 p.m.l.
It was MSUP (Kracha/Foxl to recommend the City Council deny approval of the
Negative Declaration because of lack of information end that the project applicant
or a representative be present at the March 9th meeting.
c.
IS-92-19: Date-Palm Villas. Moved by Ghougassian, seconded by McQuade to
recommend denial of the Mitigated Negative Declaration due to the high density;
Ayes - Ghougassian, McQuade; No. Hall, Fox, Kracha; motion failed 2.3.
Comments were made on the high density of the area, elthough it is noted that
the applicant is in compliance with the zoning and plan. McQuade opposed the
park fees required due to its location west of 805 and also requested the project
provide a play area on site. It was moved by Kracha, seconded by Hall to accept
the Mitigated Negative Declaration and add a comment about providing an
adequate play area; Ayes - Kracha, Hall, Fox, McQuada; No - Ghougassian; motion
passed 4-1 .
A further motion made by McQuade, seconded by Ghougassian to recommend the
Design Review Committee reduce tha density to 11 units in order to provide the
needed play area. After brief discussion, the motion was amended (McQuadel
Ghougassianl to recommend DRC reduce the density in order to provide open
space or adequate play area. Ayes - Ghougassian, McQuade; No . Fox, Hall,
Kracha, motion failed 2-3.
d. IS.92.23: Street Improvements, Broadway between F & I Streets. It was MSUP
(Ghougassian/McQuadel to recommend approval of the Negative Declaration.
e. IS-92-24: Sweetwater Authority Facility Upgrade. It was MSUP (FoxlKrachal to
recommend approval of the Negative Declaration.
3.
Review of the proposed Chula Vista response to the proposed listing California
Gnatcatcher as Endangered Species. It was MSUP (Kracha/McQuadel to accept the
approach by council with the attached letter. Kracha's further commented that the
government bureaucracy should stay within the local government.
136-i/tJ,.
tR?
.
.
.
MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE
MONTGOMERY PLANNING COMMITTEE
Monday, June 8, 1992
6:00 c.m.
Parks & Recreation Conference Room
Citv Hall Buildina. 276 Fourth Ave
ROLL CALL
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Chair Wheeland, Members Berlanga, Castro,
Palmer, McFarlin, Scheuer
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Member Platt, Excused
STAFF PRESENT:
Associate Planner Frank J. Herrera-A
Associate Planner Martin Miller
Senior Engineer Bill Ulrich
Planning Technician Patty Smith, Recorder
PUBLIC HEARING
DRC-92-31/PCS-92-01 - Precise Plan and Tentative Subdivision Mac
for DATE-PALM VILLAS - Acclicant T. David Evres
Staff Presentation
Associate Planner Martin Miller introduced the proposal, which
consists of the subdivision of 2.12 acres and subsequent
construction of 14 detached single family dwellings. Mr. Miller
noted that although the lot areas proposed were less than that
required in the R-1-5 zone, this was compensated for by the
inclusion of common open space and recreation areas, and may be
allowed through the Precise Plan designator which applies to this
property. Mr. Miller reviewed the proposal, and stated that
staff's recommendation is for adoption of the Mitigated Negative
Declaration IS-92-19 and approval of the project. This item has
been placed on the Planning commission agenda for the June 24, 1992
meeting.
Committee Questions
Members discussed the Initial Study and Mitigated Negative
Declaration. Member McFarlin questioned the estimated school
impacts and indicated concern over the letter issued by the Chula
Vista Elementary School District. Also of concern was the unknown
issues, especially the potential for flooding created by the
project and comments made by the Engineering department. McFarlin
questioned traffic circulation and the ADTs to be generated by this
project. She further mentioned the lack of park facilities and
asked how recreational services would be provided? Member Scheuer
seconded the concerns raised by member McFarlin.
Member Berlanga stated that ingress and egress to Broderick's otay
Acres is a major concern, particularly since Fenton's proposal will
be very impactive to the overall community. Member Castro's
J56~'i?
;)8
.
MONTGOMERY PLANNING COMMITTEE
-2-
Jt1NE 8. 19 92
brought up the issue of the Otay Valley Regional Park and the
association between nearby development and the planned park.
Member Palmer raised questions with the applicant's responses to
questions on the initial application. She noted that the 600%
increase in water usage was not addressed in the Mitigated Negative
Declaration, and indicated that she also was concerned with the ADT
count projected for this project. Palmer added that she found the
Initial Study to be incomplete. Chair Wheeland questioned the
estimated population of 35 people for 14 houses with three
bedrooms. She felt that "unknown" answers raised concerns (e.g.
page 14), and stated that she had a problem with parklands,
questioning the lack of park mitigation for an area that was
acknowledgedly substandard in its park areas. Chair Wheeland
further questioned the student figures provided and the potential
impacts to schools.
Aoolicant Resoonse
Applicant T. David Eyres stated that he felt he had a good and
viable project which would enhance the area below Main Street.
. Associate Planner Herrera-A reminded members of the goals of the
Montgomery Specific plan, one of which was to provide the
opportunity for housing ownership within the Montgomery area. He
acknowledged some potential impacts, but stated that it was felt
that this project would better the community.
Committee Discussion
.
Member Scheuer asked about the average price per unit? Mr. Eyres
stated that it was hoped to keep prices under $175,000, for
moderate income buyers. Member Scheuer stated that he had no
problem with the density and felt that the project would enhance
the area; however, he had some concerns with traffic and drainage.
Mr. Eyres stated that a drainage study would be done; Senior
Engineer Bill Ulrich explained that once the study was done, staff
would look for impacts and methods of reducing the amount of runoff
from the site. He added that additional improvements would be
required if necessary, but that the applicant could only be asked
to mitigate impacts caused by his development. Member Scheuer
stated that developments should not maintain the status quo, but
should enhance or improve the area. Mr. Ulrich responded that this
was accomplished incrementally, and that applicants would improve
the areas they developed.
Traffic was discussed, as well as the lack of improvements for
previous projects. Mr. Ulrich stated that projects in mid-block
may have received deferrals; when sufficient funds were available,
deferrals would be called in and a block grant formed if necessary
to improve the areas. Member McFarlin asked if older residents who
)56- ,-(g/ ~ 'f
.
.
.
MONTGOMERY PLANNING COMMITTEE
-3-
JUNE 8. 1992
had not newly developed their properties could be required to pay
for new improvements? Mr. Ulrich responded that this was possible.
Member Berlanga felt that the city needed a long-range plan for
traffic improvement, especially for Otay Valley Road.
Member Castro stated that he was in favor of the project. He
stated that while he was concerned with some items in the Negative
Declaration, many of these were out of the realm of either the
applicant or the city (e.g. school problems/impacts). He added
that this committee had given tacit approval to development in this
area, and that lengthy and unfavorable processing experiences would
discourage future development.
Chair Wheeland asked how a Negative Declaration could be approved
when unknowns were involved? Mr. Herrera-A advised that impacts
could only be assessed when information was available; however, the
Environmental Coordinator had found that a full E1R was not
warranted in this case. He added that adoption of the Negative
Declaration could include a reference to concerns the committee
might have. Mr. Ulrich advised the committee that a report on
drainage issues was currently being prepared for the city Council.
MSC (Palmer/Berlanga) (5-1, Wheeland opposed) to adopt
Declaration 1S-92-19 with reservations regarding
circulation and drainage.
Negative
traffic
MSUC (Scheuer/McFarlin) (amended by Palmer) (6-0) to approve DRC-92-
31 and PCS-92-01, with the recommendation that landscaping be of
drought-resistant materials.
/~6-y1 ~~
.
.
.
Extract from
Planning Commission Minutes
June 24 , 1992
ITEM 1:
PUBLIC HEARING. DRC-92-311PCS-92-01: CONSIDERATION OF A
PRECISE PLAN AND TENT A TIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR DATE-
PALM Vll.LAS, CHULA VISTA TRACT 92-01- T. David Eyres
Senior Planner Griffin presented the staff report. He stated that on June 8, 1992, the
Montgomery Planning Committee voted 6-0 to recommend approval of the project. Mr. Griffin
noted that the Commission had received prior to the meeting a copy of suggested revisions of
the recommendation, condition, and findings which he recommended the Commission include
in its motion. Based upon the conditions and findings as revised, staff recommended approval
of the project.
Commissioner Tugenberg asked what made the project exceptional, that it exceeded the top
range permitted in the General Plan.
Mr. Griffin explained when the Montgomery Specific Plan was adopted, the densities in the area
were often calculated on a neighborhood basis rather than on a typical basis as in other areas.
The resultant zoning often appeared to be beyond what the range would allow, but based upon
the neighborhood-type calculation, it was found to be consistent when the plan was adopted and
the subsequent rezonings took place. The recent evaluation of zoning consistency took place
with the Montgomery rezoning program, and was not based upon prior County condition.
Commissioner Casi\las noted the project was allowing additional open space and recreational
areas, and asked how much was being given up to that common open space area. Mr. Griffin
said that any area taken out of the private yards was to be taken up in common open space.
Commissioner Decker, referring to the conditions of approval for the precise plan, asked about
the minimum setback for units 5 and 9. Mr. Griffin pointed out the locations of the units on the
overhead.
Commissioner Decker, referring to 4b on page 1-4, asked for inclusion of "and boat trailers."
Mr. Griffin concurred.
Regarding page 6, grading and drainage, Commissioner Decker asked about control during
grading. Mr. Griffin noted that the control is part of the standard grading ordinance and would
be required of any grading activity on the site.
Commissioner Decker asked if the homes fell under the category of low and moderate income.
Mr. Griffin deferred to the applicant.
Commissioner Decker, referring to the common area, asked if it would be construc~ to allow
fire equipment to access in an emergency. Mr. Griffin said fire access had been conSIdered., and
there would not be the ability to cross the open space areas, but the streets had been deslgn,ed
to allow the Fire Department access and turn-around. The design had been approved by the Fire
Department.
/5d-S-ZJ .3{
.
Extract from
Planning Commission Minutes
June 24, 1992
Referring to page 1-8, Commissioner Martin was concerned about the traffic. Mr. Griffin
discussed some of the surrounding streets and when the traffic count had been done.
Commissioner Martin asked when a traffic light was installed. City Traffic Engineer Rosenberg
explained that traffic activity was monitored as development occurred to determine when the
traffic conditions would warrant the installation. An evaluation would be made and compared
with other traffic candidates throughout the City. A recommendation would be made to the City
Council accordingly.
Commissioner Martin asked if the distance of the traffic light from Hilltop and Main would
make a difference. Mr. Rosenberg said the proximity of adjacent signalized intersections would
have a bearing on their recommendation.
Commissioner Carson, referring to page 1-35, asked what type of tree was being removed from
lot 2. Mr. Griffin did not know what type it was.
.
Regarding page I-IS, Subdivision Map Act, Commissioner Carson asked for an explanation of
passive or natural cooling opportunities. Mr. Griffin said it was a requirement of the State
Subdivision Map Act. Assistant Planning Director Lee explained it had to do with the
orientation of the homes, but in this instance it would be more through the location of windows
and insulation of the house.
Commissioner Carson questioned the "imaginative play area design rather than a structured play
...area" on page 1-3. Mr. Griffin answered that it related to the following language regarding
the inclusion of boulders and mounds.
This being the time and the place as advertised, the public hearing was opened. No one wishing
to speak, the public hearing was closed.
MSUC (Casillas/Carson) 6-0 (Commissioner Tuchscher absent) that based on the Initial
Study and comments on the Initial Study and Negative Declaration and Addendum thereto,
find that the project would have no significant environmental impacts and adopt the
Negative Declantlon issued on 15-92-01.
MS (CaslllaslMartin) tbat based on tbe findings contained In Section D of the starr report,
recommend that tbe City Council approve the Precise Plan, DRC-92-31, and Tentative
Subdivision Map for Date Palm Villas, Cbula Vista Tnct 92-01, subject to conditions 1
throu&h 9 of the Precise Plan, and conditions for the Tentative Subdivision Map 1-22, as
amended.
Commissioner Tugenberg stated that he would vote against the project, because it was very over
built, and he did not feel it would benefit the City or the neighborhood.
.
VOTE:
5-1 (Commissioner Tugenbera against; Commissioner Tuchscher absent)
Chair Fuller noted that Commissioner Tuchscher needed to be excused from the meetings of
1une 17 and 24 (business conflicts). /S6~ 5/
MSUC (Decker/Carson) 6-0 to excuse Commissioner Tuchscher from the meetings of June .3ct..
17 and 24.
.
3.
.
.
"
THE Cln' OF CHUL4. J7STA PARn'DISCLOSC.'RE STATEMENT
SI;J":m~nt of disclosure of cert:lin ownership interests, payments. or c:lmpaign contriliutions;-lln ntl m:IIl,'rs
which will require discretional)' action on the part of the City Council, Planning Commission. nnd i111111h~r
cHi.illl bodies. The following information must be disclosed:
1. . List the names of all persons having . financial interest in the contract, i.e., contrnctor,
subcontractor, material supplier.
~ .. ~ ~"..,~
'..6' - - PAc..;" 1I/~ I4P c.P
..
.'
If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all
individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership
interest in the partnership,
-,-, ~AIIIl:J E"'1',/!tFS
--J!?1c.H ALb MC/tt'cE"
M tcH.+tn.. Z/ Me III
.
.
If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is non.profit organization or a trust, list the names
of any person serving as director of the non.profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or
trustor of the trust.
4, Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of the City staff,
Boards, Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months? Yes_
t<\o ~ If yes, please indicate person(s):
5. Please identify each and every person, including any agents, employees, consultants or independent
contractors who you have assigned to represent you before the City. in this malter.
p~,,) /=it-fNItL/N - bt!rI't:MntL
,
6. Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggregate, contributed more than $1.000 to a
Councilmember in the current or preceding election period'! Yes_ NoL If yes, 5tntl.: which
Councilmember(s):
"
r...,,," is defined as: "All)' ifldMdun1./iml, co'pn"flr'ship.joiflll~nln, GSs<<inliofl, l<<i"I t!ub.!'.nlcmnl ot;nlliznlioll, Corpora/ioll,
.'.,,,/~, /11/SI, ,ceci,'c" S)'lIdicnlt, this nnd nil)' /Jlltcr COUII/)'. cif)' nlld coun"" cil)', mUllicip"'il)', disl,icl or ollte, polilic," sUbu".;si,,",
01' .11/)' o/ltrr C'oup or cOlllhillfl/ioll nClillg ns n IIlIil,"
.OTE:
.):Il~:
AII~ch addiliCln~1 ,,~Scs ~~ nCCCSSM)')
Ij'fll-
, ,
2>~ . Aw1
r
&,.If; """ ;L
1I1'Vd
Sisnature of contractor/: :pl,i._:!nt I /" /? _ r 'I
b4TC.~ Vt M;$ /J V J~
~.. -rtlJAfI I/) e.,4.S
Prin r t>'l'_~ naml: of l:Clnrraclnr/:\nnJicanl
1\.il~_\nl((,,1 n,,-l'.."""" ___
I"t-; !
~.\jh"-"
File No,
PUBLIC HEARING CHECK LIST
CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING DATE -, / rlls Jq,J-
SUBJECT ))l.e..-'l2--~( <f- r~.,,- '12--0\ : '~~~ 1'-+ k~ I~-~~
<:L- J~ ~~~V\tt~ ,~/n~-r;"UJ, V~.
hOCA'fION ~,..,
tl
SENT TO STAR NEWS FOR PUBLICATION.. BY FAXL BY HAND ; BY MAIL
PUBLICATION DATE I /IX/q.J- -
r
MAILED NOTICES TO PROPERTY OWNERS
(~
NO. MAILED
1J.'t
PER GC 54992 Legislative Staff, Construction Industry Fed, 6336 Greenwich Dr Suite F. San Diego, 92122
LOGGED IN AGENDA BOOK '/ liS /Gj,J-
r ,
COPIES TO:
Administration (4)
Planning /'
,/
Originating Department
Engineering /'
Others
City Clerk's Office (2)
POST ON BULLETIN BOARDS
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:
-58.
I:; ~(j -~'?
NOTICE OF PUBUC HEARING
BY TIlE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL
CHULA VISTA, CAUFORNIA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GlVEN THAT THE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL will hold a public
hearing to consider the following:
DRC-92-31: A precise plan proposing construction of 14
detached, single-family dwellings with attached two car
garages on individual lots served by private streets. The lot
areas and lot dimensions are less than those required for R-1-S
zoned properties, but project offers common open space and
recreation areas to compensate for the smaller lots.
PCS-92-01: A request for consideration of a Tentative
Subdivision Map, DATE-PALM VILLAS, to develop a IS-lot
subdivision consisting of 14 dwelling units on 1.98 acres,
located between Date Street and Plam Avenue in R-1-S-P
Zoning District in Chula Vista.
PCZ-92-C: Considering zoning approximately 100 acres
(Agricultural zone - 100 acre minimum parcel size)
constituting the westerly shore of Lower Otay Lake (the area
between the lake and Wueste Road, south of Otay Lakes
Road).
PCC-92-04: Considering a conditional use permit from San
Diego National Sports Training Foundation to construct an
Olympic Training Center Boathouse facility on approximately
3 acres located on westerly shore of Lower Otay Lake.
If you wish to challenge the City's action on this matter in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this
notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk's Office at or prior to the,
public hearing.
SAlD PUBUC HEARlNG WlLL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL on Tuesday, July 28,
1992, at 6:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue,
NOTICE OF PUBUC HEARING
BY mE CHULA VISfA CITY COUNCIL
CHULA VISfA, CAUFORNIA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL will hold a public
hearing to consider the following:
DRC-92-31: A precise plan proposing construction of 14
detached, single-family dwellings with attached two car
garages on individual lots served by private streets. The lot
areas and lot dimensions are less than those required for R-l-S
zoned properties, but project offers common open space and
recreation areas to compensate for the smaller lots.
PCS-92-01: A request for consideration of a Tentative
Subdivision Map, DATE-PALM VILLAS, to develop a IS-lot
subdivision consisting of 14 dwelling units on 1.98 acres,
located between Date Street and Plam Avenue in R-l-S-P
Zoning District in Chula Vista.
PCZ-92-C: Considering zoning approximately 100 acres
(Agricultural zone - 100 acre minimum parcel size)
constituting the westerly shore of Lower Otay Lake (the area
between the lake and Wueste Road, south of Otay Lakes
Road).
PCC-92-04: Considering a conditional use permit from San
Diego National Sports Training Foundation to construct an
Olympic Training Center Boathouse facility on approximately
3 acres located on westerly shore of Lower Otay Lake.
If you wish to challenge the City's action on this matter in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this
notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk's Office at or prior to the,
public hearing.
SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL on Tuesday, July 28,
1992, at 6:00 P.M. in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue,
at which time any person desiring to be heard may appear.
DATED:
July 16, 1992
Beverly A. Authelet
City Clerk
r
(~r>!/P
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSIDERING:
DRC-92-31: A precise plan proposing construction of 14
detached, single-family dwellings with attached two car
garages on individual lots served by private streets. The lot
areas and lot dimensions are less than those required for R-1-
5 zoned properties, but the project offers common open space
and recreation areas to compensate for the smaller lots. The
smaller lot/common open space proposal has also resulted in
reduced setbacks and higher floor-to-area ratios. These
reductions/changes may be allowed on land with a "P" (Precise
Plan) designator on the zoning district. Submitted by T.
David Eyres.
PCS-92-01: A request for consideration of a Tentative
Subdivision Map, DATE-PALM VILLAS, to develop a 15-lot
subdivision consisting of 14 dwelling units on 1.98 acres,
located between Date Street and Palm Avenue in the R-1-5-P
Zoning District in the City of Chula vista. Submitted by T.
David Eyres.
An Initial Study, IS-92-19, of possible significant environmental
impacts has been conducted by the Environmental Review Coordinator.
A finding of no significant environmental impact has been
recommended to the City Council and is on file, along with the
Initial Study, in the Planning Department.
Any petitions to be submitted on DRC-92-31, PCS-92-01 and/or IS-92-
19 must be received by the Planning Department no later than noon
of the hearing date. If you wish to challenge the Council's action
in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or
someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice,
or in written correspondence delivered to the Council at or prior
to the public hearing. Call 691-5101 for further information.
SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL on Tuesday,
July 28, 1992 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Services
Building, 276 Fourth Avenue, at which time any person desiring to
be heard may appear. A location map is on file with the City of
Chula vista Planning Department.
DATE:
PCS-92-01 / DRC-92-31
July 13, 1992
FILES:
~/f.1-~~
\S
,
I
62~0533000
~
62~0532900
......
.)
!)
~)
)
62~0551200
!ALDOMADO F~AMCISCO R/AMGELIN.
E
")
::""'!'!"!I
~ o. Co
'- (t(; (
CC l
i ~': (
C C ,(
~_ m (: (
eel (
c.,~,-.
)
")
)
)
.2~0552600 .)
hALCOI SALVADOk V/A!ELIA F <DW
A)
)
)
62~0553000
_A!
62~0552900
~
............,r911
:J
\
\
62~0553~OO :)
USLlrE TITLE IiSURANCE CO OF [ .
nLAS
C/O DUn TEi.U
62~0553300
~UCILLE L
.....""."c 91911
,
/
. 62~0553700
. err (......ATE-UU VI
.' ( 0
Ct. ( (
0' ( ,
G t' ( (
o~ c'
C t (
'.... c'
...
~
62~0553800
~
(I
.
62~055~200
iiIiiiiIiiiiiIf
.
.
62~ 055~500
VEGA BOaBERTO
.......
.
.
62'0555000
hARRIOS AITOIIO/lNITl
62~ 055~900
RAPhAEL GEORGE V/ELWlkl
.
I
\(/~0~
~'-'~~
".it};
".;"J~ 11,.1,,1,,
"~;~;'~'n
ll;
~~,~
V"';.rj'~ . d,"- ~~h'
., ._",.", ,,! """""-
,:4~:,',L'>"", ~"."I'o'!.".~;i~
~,' "'~'",." ".""-
'flI!fr;~"" ..,.;<~~'<<'W'......
\.;,.;1;...:,;~_ ..'~'~
>~
\
I
'....
'" ,',:,:.;,
, ",,,"",,"
.", '~.,.
"\I;:.A"'~ ~~~" "
;"" '
I
<'
<:'-.
',,~,;fjlo-k1f."
'\0.
';*:~';j ~'lA::~..,!~~
.",.
"".
\i"
'.\'I'*'~"4
't
~CAR~EI L
CHULA VISTA CA 91911
I
6240532800
HALBERT JOIiR "I"ARlA E
237 i'AL" AVE
CHULA VISTA CA 91911
6240533300
VASQUEZ FRAICISCO A6ALICIA
A~lL Y TRUST 10-06-9
1805 CABERIET DR
CHULA VISTA CA 92013
',1
.
1744 RIOS AVE
CHULA VISTA CA 91911
'"
.
624055~0.
,"U.Uli>
"171 DAT' , '
CHULA VISTA CA 91 1
6240551100
MALDONADO FAUSTO FIAlA S
169 DATE ST
CHULA VISTA CA 91911
6240551600
ACERO CARLOS C/"ARIA T V
187 ~AlE ST
CHULA VIST A CA 91911
6240552000
GR U T iiEST ERI BAlK
C/O REO DEFT
9301 CORBII AVE .300
10RThRIDGE CA 91324
6240552400
DATE-PAL~ VILLAS
4045 BOlITA RD .110
BOUTA CA 91902
t240552800
TUDAAA ESThER G
285 DAlE ST
CHULA VISTA CA 91911
6240553200
CA8PUZANO ED~ARD A/"ARY L 19~
TRUST 06-27-90
145 E "APLES ST
CHULA VISTA CA 91911
6240553600
USLIFE TITLE IISURAICE CO
ALLAS
CtO DIXIE TEllRY
3600 ~ILSHIRE BLVD .500
LOS AlGELES CA 90010
OF I
H~ii5t!tift..~ CE A
191 DATE ST ~
ChULA VISTA CA 91911
:'~,.
2:i.1 DATE ST'
ChULA VISTA CA 91911
':tI..~~S
ChULA VISTA CA 91911
6~55270Q.,~~.."",
TUDH A ES TH ER 'G~ ','/1'..
205 DATE 5T
CHULA VISTA CA 91911
6 24 0\ijl0"';:~
GUTIEkREZ CLAu~nl'I'!I/JUAUTA
309 DATE 5T
CHULA VISTA CA 91911
!!
:t
~CE CO OF ,
A LL AS
C/O DIXIE TERiY
3600 W!LSIiIllE BLVD .500
LOS ANGELES CA 90010
6240554000
GARCIA JOSE LUIS/HARIA DEUOS.
BIO
224 I PAL" AVE
CHULA VISTA CA 91911
6240554400
DAUELS YOLUDA
166 PALY. AVE
CHULA VISTA CA 91911
6240554800
STONE MICHAEL E
13 0 aL~ AVE
CH ULA VI STA CA 91911
l
~
't \~~t~~~l9~'il"0
C IJ UL LAIi CD ES S" AI
2633 iiINDMILL V~
EL CAJOII CA 92020
'f4f~"''.IIWIl
'nr'm X~ EX' ,
CHULA VISTA CA 91911
'i:4inii~.~tt:.DIA H
196 PAL~ AVE
ChULA VISTA CA 91911
62436&0100
B
~
~Cf({
t_ Dr; ('
ell (
,_ () ,: ( I
C I ( (
,_ ().: ( I
C I c_ ( 6243710100
C..~f..,I~
- ___1
\
~
I
...
'ere (
., (
c (' ( (
or (
0(' ( (
O' (
C( C(
.'.C,
6243682100
~B
6310126&00
iiIiiiiIiiiiI
6240555700
.......
6243680200
GAkClA GIll G
6243711000
~TC
6310111500
10PEZ HE.RY A/JOYCE 1
1
)
:)
~
~
!I
,
,
~
,
,
~
.
.
.
.
.
6310121500 .
iABliEZ ~UP01PH E/EVAIGE1IIA !
.
6310122600 .
kABlkEZ kUP01PH E/EVAIGE1IIA !
6310127000
SA1IIAS FRAICISCO V/CRUZ L
\'S (r-'
.
.
.
.
.
.
6
..,
~1:'''')''''';''
.'.
.....
.". .d..,...'.....,
...
'"
V'
IF'
,>,.,
~ "
fl-
,,,. "
"'.
'".
'.','
..--
ll"
. >.-
,"'","Jl~'~",_~
.. .::'-44
''-
. ....
'Jj~~~ c'. ,,".. '. ...
~'" .... ,,~.~
,
~
r( ( ....
.( (
(: ( ( (
O( ( "
n (' ( (
t. ( "
J( ( (",.
,.( L
,.,.':~
._"',',' ',I:.';,;;t~
. .-,~--.....>-.,..'~."~",,,,~.~
'.~'!l\!'
~."
:.....0.
...-,.
~~"'6'~~"'"
.. ~OORE JOHi D/~~ A
4023 OTAY VAlLEY eo
CEULA VISTA CA 91911
"i'_ 62436202'00'" i.
CABiEiA OLGA P '.
1731 nos AVE fA
CIlULA VISTA CA 91911
~
'"'.
62436 21~ 0 :.r...
HAUERS ~EVU T
1739 IiIOS AVE fA
CIlULA VISTA CA 91911
J
6240555200
BARBOSA JESS F
4019 OTAY VALLEY RD
CHULA VISTA CA 91911
6243621300
LEVU OEBOUIl S
8745 i LA JOLLA SHORES SCEIIC
DR
LA JOLLA CA 92037
6243621700
lEDEZ~A JOSE,ecSALINA
383 THERESA A Y
CHULA VISTA CA 91911
6243680400
ORTIZ ANSEL~O S/~ARIA L B
1743 RIOS AVE .C
CHULA VISTA CA 91911
6243682400
SCHULLER HTIlUR D TR
383 ~AiKATO ST .9
CHULIi VISTA CA 91910
6243710400
GASTELUM ~ARU D
1761 RIOS AVE U
CHULA VISTA CA 91911
6243710800
LOZADA RA~ON T/LUCY E
1765 RIOS IiVL fA
CHULA VISTIi CA 91911
6243711200
INTEIiNATIOIAL CEITRAL BAIK/TR
ST CCRP TR
BOX 1090
EL TORO CA 92630
6310120500
PIIiO ARTURO Ii/ELVIRA A
353 DATE ST
CHULA VISTA CA 91911
6310121900
COIiDOVA JOSE/CARMEl
312 VALLEY AVE
CHULA VISTA CA 91911
6310123800
MASI PATRICK P/CYRTHIA M
4001 VALLU AVE
CHULA VISTA CA 91911
6310125600
MC COLLE Y MOARIS G
346 PALM AVE
CHULA VISTA CA 91911
6310126700
PLIO AATIlUR A/MARIA A
336 fAL~ AVE
CHULA VISTA CA 91911
...,~
~
..
.....~111Hrr~~g~~~u A
1743 RIOS AVE .D
CIlULA VISTA CA 91911
t
~ 'n~m:i~~:~':)!\ LA 0
1747 AI OS A VE fA
CIiULA VISTA CA 91911
-~),71030-0 .~
'f'i:lNCKE KEITHA
1761 nos AVE .C
CIlULA VISTA CA 91911
W#? 1!f ~
~rR~I~MH S .
1765 RIOS AVE 'C
CEULA VISIA CA 91911
.'l"l111(ie':,~,,--
~5ThIA JUU)G'iiAIl\LUPE
1769 liIOS AVE . C
CHULA VISTA CA 91911
~~~
331 DIiTE ST
CRULA VISTA CA 91911
631l11.217110, """._
OAOZCO LYDI A 'T'!IlIlII
345 OATE ST
CHULA VISIA CA 91911
-~ . "..-
9I'O'fid MARfA ..,.......
332 SORIA 1M
CHULA VISTA CA 91911
~~nO.2s_'~
.'MC:OLLEY ~oRRls-11!.'en
348 PALM AVE
CHULA VISTA CA 91911
tm1Wf6~g~'O~VANGELIHA .
310 PUK AVE
CHULA VISIA CA 91911
N ..
...
H
...
'"
"'
0
,
'" ..
0 ..
.. '" 0
'" '" ... H
0'" 0", 0", OU
O. 0'" 0", 0"
...... ....0 NOO "'..
"""I "., N" "'"'
.... .... .., ""H
"'.. "'.. "'N '"
0" 0'" C'" CN
"0 "... "'" "H
N'" N'" NO "'=>
>DO. "'.. "'... "'''' I. )
J')
10 )
1Il 1 J')
., 10
=> , J )
..
.. I. I
"I ... '~::J
.. H
, '"
.. ... ;
.. ,
0 ,
.. 0
.. '"
H '"
. ..
C OH 0",
C ClIl 0'"
.... ""' "'...
.... ..,,, ....
.... .... ..,...
'" "'''' "'..
0 C'" 00 \
" "0 ""
'" "'.. "'<
'" "'''' "'''' '.
'"
'"
...
H
.. 1Il
.. ..
., .. ...
, H
'" '" ...
..
... . ..
l"' 00 c" C
0.. 0" 0 :1. ")
..'" ""H "" C
0 "'''' "".. '" I J:>
...... .... ...... ..,
"'''' "'''' "'''I '" :)0
0" c'" C" 0
".. ".. ".. " I . :>
N'" N'" "'.. N :)0
"'.. "'''' "'.. '"
- , I . )
'" ~)O
..
"'" I 10
.. '" ...
"I.. ..
<
.... '" ..
'" .. ..
....H H '"
....." .. ..
...." , ,
..."" ... .. ...
"..... '"
,... ... 0
"'.... '" ... ..
"''' C ..
.....'" .. '" "I
"'.. , ... ..
"'.... U > 0
0", C 0< C C"
OOH:C C'" C'" C C
>OI"'):;)Q" "'''' '" .. ""<
0 ".. NO ""'" .... NH
<"'l"llllllo<lll ....., ...." "" ""..
If'loC14Q:l '" "'0 '" "''''
0..... C" C" 0 c"
4-"';Q:ln ".. "" " ""
NOOOlli..... N'" "'... '" N~
IQlll::VlU "'''' "'''' '" "'..
( "'". ..~.. '" ., "I "" '" "I " '" " "'I /s1
, \s 1ft
~
....
I
!J)
:)
.)
,)
.J
!IOTIeB 07 PUBLIC KBARIRG BY '1'D
CITY OW C8ULA VXBTA CITY COUHCIL
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSIDERING:
DRC-92-31: A precis. plan proposinq construction of 14
detached, .ingle-family dwellings with attached two car
garages on individual lots served by private streets. The lot
areas and lot dimensions. are less than those required for R-l-
5 zoned properties, but the project offers common open .pace
and recreation areas to compensate for the smaller lots. The
smaller lot/common open space proposal has also resulted in
reduced .etbacks and higher floor-to-area ratios. These
reductions/changes may be allowed on land with a "P" (Precise
Plan) designator on the zoning district. Submitted by T.
David Eyres.
PCS-92-01: A request for consideration of a Tentative
Subdivision Map, DATE-PALM VILLAS, to develop a lS-lot
subdivision consisting of 14 dwelling units on 1.98 acres,
located between Date Street and Palm Avenue in the R-1-S-P
Zoning District in the City of Chula vista. Submitted by T.
David Eyres.
An Initial study, IS-92-19, of possible significant environmental
impacts has been conducted by the Environmental Review Coordinator.
A finding of no significant environmental impact has been
recommended to the City Council and is on fUe, along with the
Initial Study, in the Planning Department.
Any petitions to be submitted on DRC-92-31, PCS-92-01 and/or 18-92-
19 must be received by the Planning Department no later than noon
of the hearing date. If you wish to challenge the Council's action
in court, you may be limited to raising only those i.sues you or
someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice,
or in written correspondence delivered to the Council at or prior
to the public hearing. Call 691-5101 for further information.
SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL on Tuesday,
July 28, 1992 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Services
Building, 276 Fourth Avenue, at which time any person desiring to
be heard may appear. A location map is on file with the City of
Chula vista Planning Department.
FILES:
DATE:
PCS-92-01 / DRC-92-31
July 13, 1992
AQ0
/((JtJ
~~
I10TICII 01' PUBLIC B:DaII1Q BY 'nIB
CITY 01' CHOLA VISTA CITY COU11CIL
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE
CITY OF CHOU VISTA CITY COUNCIL FOR THE PURPOSE OF CONSIDERING:
DRC-92-31: A preci.e plan proposing construction of 14
detached, single-family dwellings with attached two car
garages on individual lot. .erved by private streets. The lot
are.sand lot di.ensions are less than those required for R-1-
5 zoned properties, but the project offers common open apace
and recreation areas to compensate for the smaller lots. The
smaller lot/common open space proposal has a180 resulted in
reduced setbacks and higher floor-to-area ratios. These
reductions/changes may be allowed on land with a "P" (Preci.e
Plan) designator on the zoning district. Submitted by T.
David Eyres.
PCS-92-01: A request for consideration of a Tentative
Subdivision Map, DATE-PAUt VILlAS, to develop a 15-10t
subdivision consisting of 14 dwelling units on 1.98 acres,
located between Date Street and Palm Avenue in the R-l-S-P
Zoning District in the City of Chula Vista. Submitted by T.
David Eyres.
An Initial Study, IS-92-19, of possible significant environmental
impacts has been conducted by the Environmental Review Coordinator.
A finding of no significant environmental impact has been
recommended to the City Council and. i. on file, along with the
Initial Study, in the Planning Department.
Any petitions to be submitted on DRC-92-31, PCS-92-01 and/or IS-92-
19 must be received by the Planning Department no later than noon
of the hearing date. If you wish to challenge the Council'. action
in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or
someone else raised at the public hearing described in thia notice,
orin written correspondence delivered to the Council at or prior
to the public hearing. Call 691-5101 for further information.
SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL on Tuesday,
July 28, 1992 at 6:00 p... in the Council Chambers, Public services
Building, 276 Fourth Avenue, at which time any person desiring to
be heard may appear. A location map i. on file with the city of
Chula Vista Planning Department.
FILES:
DATE:
PCS-92-01 / DRC-92-31
July 13, 1992
/f;! )P I
\~
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
/~
ITEM TITLE:
Meeting Date 7/28/92
It. 711 Approving Rate Schedules for
and Disposal of Refuse Effective July 1,
RESOLUTION
Collection
1992
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Finance~
REVIEWED BY: City ManageuG ~~ (4/5THS Vote: Yes_No--1L)
At its meeting last week, the city Council reviewed the requested
rate increases for the collection and disposal of refuse by Laidlaw
Waste Systems. A two-tiered rate schedule was proposed to be
effective July 1 and September 1, 1992. Council requested staff to
return with a "blended" rate to be effective July 1 that spread the
landfill component increase of 21.7% over twelve months instead of
ten months.
Exhibit One indicates the recalculated blended rate to be effective
July 1, 1992 for residential service.
Exhibit Two indicates the recalculated blended rate to be effective
July 1, 1992 for commercial service.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Council adopt the Resolution
schedule to be effective July 1,
disposal of refuse.
approving the "blended" rate
1992 for the collection and
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION:
DISCUSSION:
Not Applicable.
Laidlaw was requesting a two-tiered rate increase. The first,
which would have been effective July 1, 1992 reflected the normal
adjustment for CPI and pass through of the city franchise fee
increase. The second, which would have been effective September 1,
1992 reflected the increase in the County landfill rate.
Council requested that, rather than having two rate increases,
staff calculate a blended rate that would result in one rate
increase to be effective July 1, 1992. Staff has performed the
requested calculation with the following results:
I~" /
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date 7/28/92
Tvoe of Service
Existing Rates
as of 6/30/92
Previous
Two-Tiered
Rate Proposed
to be Effective
9/01/92
Residential (Single
Family)
$11. 25
$12.41
Blended Rate
to be
Effective
7/01/92
$12.28
Trailer Parks & Motels
(minimum per month)
$18.51
$20.10
$19.98
Senior Yellow Bag Program
$40.65
$11.18
$44.61
$12.37
$44.13
$12.25
commercial and Industrial
(one time weekly)
Complete rate schedules are provided on Exhibits One and Two.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The blended rate results in somewhat lower rates to be effective
July 1 than were proposed to be effective September 1.
This rate also includes a pass through of the franchise fee
increase from 7.5% to 8.0% and the City will receive an estimated
$670,000 in franchise fee revenue in FY 92-93. Of that amount,
approximately $40,000 is resulting from the one-half percent
increase.
Exhibit One - Proposed Rate Schedule for Residential to be
Effective July 1, 1992
Exhibit Two - Proposed Rate Schedule for Commercial to be
Effective July 1, 1992
Exhibit Three - Staff Report of 7/21/92 with Attachments
I~ -..,2. //,-/?
RESOLUTION NO. 16719
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING, AFTER PUBLIC HEARING,
RATES FOR COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE
EFFECTIVE JULY I, 1992, AND SEPTEMBER I, 1992
WHEREAS, on or about July 28, 1982, the City adopted Ordinance No. 1993
providing for a franchise for the collection of trash in the City of Chula Vista,
which ordinance was amended in March,1985 by Ordinance No. 2104 and again in
August, 1991 by Ordinance No. 2475 ("Trash Franchise Ordinance"); and,
WHEREAS, Section 9.2 of the Trash Franchise Ordinance permits either party,
upon filing a notice of intention, to modify rates subject to certain terms and
conditions; and,
WHEREAS, subparagraph 5 of Section 9.2 of the Trash Franchise Ordinance
provides that the City Council has the right, within twenty (20) days after the
commencement of sai d noti ce, to request a pub 1 i c heari ng in whi ch case sai d
proposed rate increases shall be subject to and shall not be instituted until
review and written approval by the City Council; and,
WHEREAS, Laidlaw has requested a rate increase pursuant to the provisions
of Section 9.2 of the Trash Franchise Ordinance and has issued its notice of
intention in that regard, and within the prescribed twenty (20) day period of
time, the City Council has requested a publ ic hearing for the purpose of
reviewing said rates, notice of which has been duly and timely provided to the
franchisee; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has conducted a public hearing on July 21, 1992
pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 5 of Section 9.2 of the Trash Franchise
Ordinance for the purpose of reviewing and approving the proposed rate structure
and rate increase request;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DOES HEREBY
FIND, DETERMINE, ORDER AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1.
The residential and commercial rates identified on Attachment
2 (Attachment 1 omitted) as proposed for July I, 1992 for the
collection and disposal of refuse are hereby approved and said
rates shall be in effect as of July I, 1992.
SECTION 2.
The residential and commercial rates identified on Attachment
3 as proposed for September I, 1992 for the collection and
disposal of refuse are hereby approved and said rates shall be
in effect as of September 1, 1992.
SECTION 3.
This resolution shall take and be in full force and effect
immediately upon the passage and adoption hereof.
1~--3
~ .., ... .. ., ., .., C> ... - .. C> .. N N
~ C! .. "': .. ... C! ": .. C! . ., C! "! ..
- 0 - 0 0 - - 0 - l'i l'i - - N
~ ~ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
-'--
~ w . I i:fl: ::1 '10" :1 I I . ", I I:
~ i . rw~ ~.;:I
i . "",':,:: "
. Is I <": "~
.
. tl!'; :-:".,..: :~i;: ",I
",., . :~:~: ,""" :~.'
z ~ - l!l - ! g - ;;; l!l - N fi ;;;
81 W - N - - - - ..,
~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
!!I ~
III
- GO ~'i
~ C> ... Iii .. C> .. .. . . l!l ..
r i .. C> .. - .. C> C> .., .. ..
~ oj ~ .. l'i .,; oj cO ~ oj ~ ~ ,.: .. &
0 .. .. - .. .. .. .. .. .. .. -
!II " "0 .. ~ ~ .. ..
~ ';j C> C> C> C> C> C> C> ; . .. .. -
i .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . ., .., .
8 ~ l'i l'i l'i l'i l'i l'i l'i l'i l'i .. .. l'i oj .,;
~ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. - - .. .. ..
.. ..
- - .. I-;:
~ ~ g ... .. C> N .. ... - .. .. .. .. ...
.. .. "! .. .. .. C! .. co ., ., ... ~ .,
.; 0 0 - 0 0 0 - 0 0 l'i l'i 0 .. N
~ ~ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
~
~
-'-- -'-
C\I Ii i -;::'(jl .. ... C> - N ... - ..'OJ N - N
0 - C> - C> - - - C> - . . - N ..,
O'l 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
I 0 i ~ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
~
Z ~ ~
.... S " N 0; '0
I ~ ~ :;! ., - .. C> . N ... . N N
< ! N - . - - N N - - .. CO N . ..
..... (/) ~ ~ ii 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
I- UJ UJ !i g ~ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
en > I- ~ ;;
:;: ~ < C W -;:- -;:- .. .. .. .. .. .. .. - f- ., CO .
~ ~ - -
< a: II! ., ., ., ., ., ., ., ., ., N N ., ... "':
...J U ...J ::I ~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 N N 0 0 -
UJ l!5 ~ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
u.. < 3 ~
:I: u.. ~ ~~ =~
U UJ Z ~ ., C> C> C> . .. ., III ~ C> ~ ..,
~ ~ ., ... . . C> ., CO ... - .. -
u.. UJ UJ oj l'i .. l'i .,; oj ,.: l'i oj .,; .,; ,.: .; &
0 ...J 0 ~ 0 ~ .. .. - .. .. .. .. .. .. N N .. -
z .. ~ r.!! .. ..
CO en w ~ .. f-;;;-
> < z ~ .., .., .., .., .., .., .., ~ ~ - C> ..
I- UJ i ~ i - - - - - - - - - C> . ...
I- l'i l'i l'i l'i l'i l'i l'i l'i l'i N N ..; .,; ,.:
U a: 8 :5 .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. - ~ .. .. ..
UJ i .. -;:- ~
I- w ~ .., .., .. CO ... .. ., ., ... .. ., CO
0 .. ., "': ., .. .. CO ., .. C> C> CO "! N
< Ii .: 0 0 - 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 l'i l'i 0 - N
a: ~ ~ .. .. , .. .. .. .. .. Z .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
~
~ .. ::> -.; f-;;;
- ..
~ Ie ~ - z 8 .. ... - i a: .. S .. li: III
~ . .. C> .. . .. .. - "':
; . c:i ,.: 0 oi ,.: .; c:i W ,.: c:i ~ & ~
~ ~ R ~ - ll. - -
- .. - .. .. - - .. - . -
. .. .. .. .. W .. .. .. .. .. ..
! ~ .
- - g -'-
0; 0; ()
i ~ ... .. N .. C> ,'~ ... ., ... N ..
N - ..I . - N N .., - N N ., ..
0 ~ . 0 0 ..I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ,,; 0 ,,;
i! ~ .. .. ~ .. .. .. .. .. w .. .. .. .. ..
f/)
III ~ z 2
~ ~ ~ . 'I i tti .:;:"",' "ilI' S ;ijl; lR < :1 .... ~ Ii .:J Ii s "':~.:
)11. ,Ill ?~~~ () :::t!oii:: Alt
~ ~ :I :::N~: I il ,.:.,.:." ?iit < :..~. g
R () dO' "<:> ,:~: <!l
tl ~ . :;;~: - {I: .;~: ::,>ro;<o ..I ='=..: ...~ ,=
~ . ::~::::~: :;:;~:::::=: "If 'If ~ ,"':N: ::::~::~:: 0 !!IF!! .....
''''' f/) a:
..I f/)
W C ll. ::>
b ~ . W c II!
.' . <!l 2
! ~ i: '"
~ :li C ~ < z
. i: " III 11 ~
! en " '" C
. oil - '" '" ,~ I ~ ~
Z ~ :l: ~ .. '" '" iC z
::> f/) ... ~ " ... :I f/) iC ~ 0 ~ "
lIl: z " F lIl: I '" ~ " ~ '"
9 " '" z "
..I a: 0 '" '" !. a: ~ ... '"
'" '" 0 0 c " '" iC
< . < :I iC ~ W 0 '"
.. . '" iC .. F F :l: ,~ " '"
N i= ... ! ll. 0: iC <II ~ li ~ '" iC <II
.. i II! '" <II ::> " " i iC '"
'" z ~ ~ !!j ~ <II
'" C . a: <II :I '" " a: a: it w '" :I
W '" :I " ... E '" F
~ ... - ~ :I F W ::E :I :I
N C ~ ::> :I F lI: ..I 0 0 Q ~ .. F F
> .. J6-3 ~ F '" " " :li S '"
" I CiS ! ~ :I ~ 0: ~ ~ z ! ! ili
N " :I 0 ::> ~ 0 w co 0 ~
~ N M! z .. ~ :l: 0 :< ~ .. :l:
I Iii . i 0 f/) ~ I () ::> 0 ...
il: ... .. ... ... C>
e'Y-H I e I' 0 A/i;i'
-..
FILENAMe: CVS82SUM
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
RATE TABLE EFFECTIVE 7-1-92
RESIDENTIAL & RECYCLING CONTRACTS SUMMARY
7-22-82
EXISTING PROP
RATE AT RATE RATE AT IIN~R
SINGLE FAMILY UNITS I 6-30-92 MODIFICATION 7~1-92
SINGLE FAMILY UNIT WASTE RATEl I $10.151 I $1.031 I $11.181 110.1%
SNGLE FAMILY RECYCLE RATE l I $1.101 I $0.001 ~ I 0.0%
I ..... ~2.28l
TOTAL SINGLE FAMILY RESI RATE I I $11.251 I $1.031 19.2%
EXISTING PROPOSEC
RATE AT RATE RATE AT IIN~R
MULTI UNITS I 6-30-92 MODIFICATION 7-1-92
MULTI UNIT WASTE RATE l 1 $7.471 1 $0.891 I $8.361 111.9%
MULTI UNIT RECYCLE RATE I I $1.1 0 1 I $0.001 1 $1.1 0 1 I 0.0%
TOTAL MULTI UNIT RESI RATE I 1 $8.571 I $0.891 I $9.461 110.4%
-..,
-..
/fp -/p
2-
eXHIBiT o~
"
~
"'
~
C\I
Cll
I
..-
~~(/)
Cl)WW
->1-
>-<
<I-a::
...JC)...J
~W<
:t:u.-
u.C)
Wa::
u. W
O~:E
>a:l:E
1-<0
(31-C)
W
I-
<
a::
&j
..
:I
o
g
o
!!l
ll:
~
! ~ i
~ ~ 8
I ·
Ill!! a
~~l!!'!'
IH
Ii'
~n
~
f!! ~ ~
z 0 ~
w
~-
!Ii ;j
8 ~ ~
loU' :s a:
...
;-1 ~
~ ..
III
~
~
q
., I III
~ E 1lo.
i=T"'"
ed
"' I -
~ ! ~
w""W"""C
!C tI:! 1,1
a: ~ =
l!5. ~
3 ·
~
n
f!! 0
15-
z ~
U~
o ~ ~
o
I!!-
q5
! ~
~
.
i ~ !ic .
l~ n
I I i
51
Zj!!~o;
;~I!!*
1:l1~~
TI
n
Ii
-
&j
I
~
I
...
.. ~ CD ....
~ N po. III
:ni i:i
i i :e l(l
N"; .0 C
;;;;
~ m I ~ ~ ~
Q N ,.: ,..: Gi .-
UUIUU::l
"I,'.!~!I.'r .' . ':..~.:~..~..i:~..~
,"'~2 '.' ....IUS
. '::M: :<.- :.: . ;'. ,.: :.: -:. '-:'Il .::&
N tn I~ ,:;,.". :'@."'A k :;,:1.11",. \:
... 0 E III ~ Itl ... ... Cl ~ C') ... ~ ...
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
e e e e ee ~; ~;;;; ~
~ ~ ~ ~ ~
f'J C'J ,. In N
;1 :l i i :
S i III ... ~ ~
~ Ii Ii Ii I ~
.. . .. .. .. .
rD ~ ~
~ 8 ;
a a a
... "',,' ~ ~ ~ ~ : : ~
~ ~ ~ N N .
; ; ; ; ;1 ;1 i i ;
... .. ..
In C"! N
.) .. .;
; : :
g g
g 5!
~ ~
.. ..
~ I :;
:i :i i
..~~:;:
0: N .;: Iti ci oj
.. .. ; ; ; ..
.. CD It) 0 ID
:~~~~
aaaa;
~ ~ ~ ~ III ~ III ~ ~ I g ~ g ~
g g ; ; ; ; u ~ ~ u ~ ~ ~ i
~ i III III ~ ~ ~ III . ~ ~ ~ ~ 0
; ; u u u ~ ~ i i :i :i i i ~
; ; g ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~
U ~ i i ~ ~ = a N
..
In 10 CD ,.. po.
o .. .. CI .
N :! .,: ci ci
.. .. 4IIt .. ..
~ ~ .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~
~ In i i i : ! ~ ~ CD i ~ ~ ~
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ~ ~ u
~ ~ ~ ~ :; 0; ~
M co) III CD oi CD C':I
; ; a a ::l ::l :l
N N
.. ..
ai cD
... ...
.. ..
" "
" ,;
: :
. N N
: ~ :
II i i
t ~ ~ ~ : ~ ~ g : ~ ~ : ~ :
: ~ ~ : g N ~ ~ ~ N N N N N
.. ... ... .. .. .. . .. tit ..
8 !il
oi .0
~ :;
.. ..
.. ...
8 =
;;
OJ .. ..
.... ...
~ $ ~
- - -
......
Clt 1ft CI ~ CD It) ~
C'!~~"t~q:
,... N CD = ~ g ....
liuuu::l::l::l
N .... CD N Clt ,... CI CD . ... . ~ N N
~ ~ ~ ~ CI N . Clt 0 CD CD ... ~ ~
aa;;;;;lililililili::::i
IF;&_.ii\iltf........, ..~I
~ ill.rs,~.. ..';R'l<<
III:: · ... !~:II
~ = I ~ ~ = ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ;
__NNC")('l')........lI')l,I)CQCO............
...............-.....---------
j!!ijj
~;
$ ~ $ ~ S ~ ~ ~ $ ~ $ ~ $ ~
~ ~ ~ = ~ = = = = = = = = =
2 2 2 2 222 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
~ ~ ~ ~ j j j j j ~ j j j j
2 2 2 222 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
i ~ ; i ; ; ; j ; i ; ; ; i
z ~ ~ ~ , ~ N ~ ~ ; m ~ ~ i
. 0 ~ m . ~I~. 0 N m ~ ~ 0
..;;;;;; U UI..::l::: ~ ~ ~
_l!\)..........,~
....~.:.~.'.::. :.~ :.~.'..
.., ..... ..'f!
. .. . .
... . p 1ft CI ... 0 ...
~ ~ ~ C'! ~ ~ ~ C'! ~ ~ ~ C'! ~ ~
oO-----I=NNNfIt:'"
N .
... ...
.. IIri
; :
I i I I B ~ ; . ~ i ~ I
~ m I ! ~ i I _ ~ ~ I ~
.. ; ; a a au; C ; ::l ;1
PJ CO) .. lID .
~ ~ ~ II! N
... t\I tit .;
::l ::l i i :
~ :: :: : :
.; Ii Ji ::i ki
a;;;;
III :;
i I
.. ..
I I
at ai
id
:! ~
i
..
II) .. CD ,.:.
~ :I : ~
a a a ::l
N 1ft ... 0 III N
:~:::J~
::l ;1 ;1 ;1 II :l
" .
.. ..
.; ..
; ..
~ ~ I ~ 0 ~ I ~ U R I ~
; ; U ~ ~ ~ ~ i i ~ ~ i i ~
~ ~
~ : I I c ~ ; I 0 I : ~ ~ ..
u u ~ i :i i i ~ i i i ~ ~
;; ;; ;;
~ ~ :; :;
i i i i
o 2 f: ~ ;! ;!
.. .; ci ci I"i P)
l:l l:l l:l l:l ; ::l
CI lit .. CI
.. .. N N
.. .. G cD
;; ;; ;; ;;
~ 0 m U III : ; ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
N i ~ ~ ; I 8 ~ ~ 9 ~ ~ ~ ~
; ;;;; a a a ::l ::l ::l ; ;1
~ ~ N N ~ ~ ~ , B B ~ : ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ e e ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
. . . . . . . . . . . ;; . .
!l Ii
i i
.. " ...
.. " "
.; ci cD
;; ;; ;;
~ : : s : : ~ : ~
a a a ::l ; ; ;1 ;1 II
- - ..
- OJ ...
;; ~ ~
;;;
eft III N ... 1ft .... V) C
lID Clt CI .. CI ... . III
~i8~~~~~
UU::l::l::l::~
.. OJ "
.. .. ...
~ ! g
~ili
CD .... 1ft ... ... . ... 1ft . C ~ C . ~
_ ~ c 0 ~ 0 ~ N C ~ . ~ ~ 0
;;lilili:~~::iii:iii
-'~'III>!.~~jl~'.."".'
.."'...... '.' "1"1"1
.' ........... ..... . ...... .'
. .. ., . .. .. ..
::. ,:: :,:. .:::. .::: .::: -::, :::
....,. ,.". ;.,... ,. i"" j..}, '\,{.I ,..e 'k.. '\""
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ = = = = = ~
~~~~~~~~
__NNC')C')......lt)lt)coco""'"""'"
NNNNNNNNNNNNNN
w ~ w ~ w ~ w ~ w ~ w ~ w ~
~ c ~ c ~ c ~ c ~ c ~ c ~ c
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
2 2 2 2 2 2 :I 2 2 2 222 2
j ~ j j j ~ ~ ~ j 5 j j j ~
>> >> >> >> a >> :I :I :I >> :I :I :I >>
2 K 2 K 2 K 2 K 2 ~ 2 K 2 K 7
5;3;iii;S:Ei;ii /d:,--
3 CIOfl'" (,- r<.V' 0
.~ OJ ill lil i '" .., ~ .. .. .. 51 is ! 51 ~ ill lil .. ~ ~ i ill .. ~ .. If '" OJ
! .., .. ~ ~ .. ~ .. .. .. .. ~ .. "':
I!! Z .; ..; ..; ,; on ,; ,.: ,; .,; " " .; ,; ,.: ,.: .,; " ..; ,.: ,; .; on ,; ~ ,.: .,; .; ..
ill ~ ~ ;0 ;0 U U ::l :l :l '" ::i I .. .. I I ~ ~ ::l ::l :l ::i I I I I a a ~ ~
.. .. .. .. .. ~ ~
. .. ..
~ ~!C SI ,~"p~p-~ II '''1f''''! 'II II 'II
~ 11 :! ~.!. ..\ . ,n .,~ ""I[t".I~I'~'
N ill ..I .1;1 . .i ,.1 · '.' 1,,1 ill;1 11,"'1, ~..
w 11 H .~L. .:,,,:,,z L.i il:...,. ". ."I~
~
.
fj I j ~ ~I~I~I~I~I~I~ ~ ~I~ "': ~ ~ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
l!J n ; ~ I~ ~ OJ Ig Ig I~ Ie .., Ie I; I~ I~ ~ ; ; g ~ ; .., .., .. .. '" .. .. ..
Ie Ie Ie
ill ~ " li ~ . ill ~ ; " ill ~ II ~ , '" iI II , li ill I ~ , I ::l ~ II
~ .. ~
~ ~ Ii ~ . ,; ~ ~ 3 Ii ~ " ~ ~ 1i N Ii ,: . ~ Ii ;z oi , . , , Ii i ~
" ~ ~ ~ j ~
~ ;; ;; ;; l: :l :l :l :l ;1 ;1 ~ i ;; ;; l: l: :l ;1 ~ II i " " i
w 0 .. .. .. .. ..
z
o ----
loj . :! .. .. ~ ~ ill ill ~ ~ '" '" I I ~ ~ ;: ;: ill ill ~ ~ t t ~ ~ I I
" " .. ..
au " " . . ; i i Ii Ii ~ ~ ~ ~ .. oi f.i f.i i i :0 . . ~ ~ Ii Ii
;1 ;1 : : . i i ~ ii ii
;; ;; ;; l: l: N l: :l :l ;; ;; ;; ;; l: l: :l :l ;1 ;1
l!! S .. ..
" -
It
. 5 c " .. .. ~ . ~ . ~ .. .. .. .. .. .. ; .. .. ~ . .. . .. N ; .. :0 III
.. .. .. .. ~ .. ~ " " .. .. .. ~ .. .. ~ .. .. .. .. . ~
w . ..; .. ..; .. .. .. N " ~ .. ~ ,; '" oi " .. .. . .. " " .; ..; .. ,; ..; 3 8
z l: l: :l ;1 ;1 ;1 II II i i " i ;; l: l: :l ;1 ;1 II i to to i :
~ w ;; ;; .. ;;
C\l ~ ..
Ol
I H . .. . " .. ~ ~ ..
..... Ii; Ii! i! ::; "! i! " :: :: Ii! !! I ~ " iii ::l ~ ::l ~ N " 8 ~ .. .. N .. ..
I .. I ~ ;; ;; Ii Ii . Ii .; Ii " " Ii i .; .; Ii Ii Ii i ~ Ii " Ii i i oi ..; ..
< .. .. .. .. ;; ;; .. .. ;; ;; ;; ;;
en z ! III
.... .... 0 ~
en w w !i ~ i iii ~ ~ il ~ ~ ~ .. N ~ .. ~ .. .. ~ ; , 8 " ~ ~ " ~ . ~ "
.... 0 .. .. . " " .. .. . ~ .. . ~ "
:> > jj; Ii i Ii Ii i i .. .; ..; .. .; " .. i Ii Ii Ii Ii .; oi ..; .; ,; '" ~ ~ ..
< m & .. ;; ;; ;; ;; ;; ;; ;; ;; ;; ;; l: l:
;:: 8 g .. .. ..
< a: .
C) "
..J ..J w .",...=
:::> w < 0- W . ~ ~ .. .. .. .. N N ~ ~ .. .. ; ; ; .. .. .. N .. .. .. .. . . .. ..
" ~ 0 . . .. .. .. .. ~ ~ .. .. .. .. .. ~ ~ " .. .. .. .. .
:t u. U ~ . " " .. .; .. .. .. .. ~ ~ .; .; i Ii '" : .. .. .. .. .. .. " " " "
u. ~ f .. .. ;; N l: N l: :l :l ;1 ;1 ~ ~ ;; .. N ~ :l ;1 ;1 ~ II i i
C) ~ , .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
w a: .
u. w w
0 ..J ::E a: ~ m ~ iI iii 8 ~ N : ~ 1i iii ::l ::l : " " ~ :: i;/ 8 , ~ ill ~
>- a:l ::E ~ ~ ~ .. ~ .. ~
B ~ m Ii ~ ..; II " I .. m m ~ B ~ ;!: Ii Ii Ii Ii 8 Ii .; g g ; 'IJ i
.... < .. " ii N " ;;
0 0 ;; ;; ;; l: l: l: :l :l ;1 ;1 . ~ i ;; ;; N N l: :l ;1 ;1 II i i " "
u .... 0- .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
C) ill-
w z ~ ; ; .. .. ~ ~ ; ; ill ill " " " " N N i;/ i;/ ; ; m m E; E; III III , ,
~ ~ .. .. ~ ~ ~
.... ~ ~ '" '" '" '" ~ ~ Ii Ii i i Ii Ii ,; ,: ..; ..; Ii Ii Ii Ii oi oi i Ii ,; ,; ~ ~
" :l :l " " " II II ~ ~ ii ii
< a: .. .. ;; ;; ;; ;; ;; ;; l: l: l: l: ;; ;; ;; ;; l: l: :l :l
0 S
a: 0
l!! -
" w ~ .. :!! .. .. .. .. .. ~ ~ .. ~ " :!! .. N .. .. .. .. .. . . ~ .. .. .. ..
a: 5 .. . ~ ~ .. .. ~ .. ~ . ~ " .. '" " .. ~ '" .. ~ .. ..
~ .. .. ~ " ~ .. ; .. .; " ,; ,; .; .. .; ~ .. j ,; .. '" . " i .; .;
;; ;; l: l: l: :l :l ;1 ~ ~ ~ i " ;; ;; .. :l ;1 II i i " : ..
~ Iij .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
~
0 .. .. .., c '" .. .. '" O! .. .., .. .. .., '" c .. c .., .. .., .., OJ .. .., .. .. ill
~ I!! le Q .. .. ~ ~ .. .. O! ~ "': " .. ~ ~ " ~ ~ ~ '" '" .. O! '" .. " " ..
~ ~ , :Ii ,; .. .., III .. ~ .,; .. .. ~ ,.: ~ ~ lli .. c Ii on ~ ~ ~ .; i le : ! :
j 2 .. .. ~ .. .. .. ~ .. .. .. .. .. .. c ..
, ~ ~ U ::l ::l :l :l ::i I I :; .. .. a u u ::l ::l :l ::i I :; I I c. ~"l "l
! " .. .. .. .. ..
~ ~I;; ;;
I i 0 .. OJ '" '" '" .. ~ .., .. ~ Ii ; is '" .. .. .. 0 .. .. .. l\ .. ~ ~ tel ..
~ ~ OIl .. ~ O! "l '" "': ~ 0 .. "l OIl .., '" "': "! .. "1 0
.. ~ " OJ ::l :l :l I : .. I : ,; ,; " " = ::l :l ~ : .. I : ~ ~ .; ..; ,; ,.:
Ii .. .. .. ;0 ;0 ;0 ~ .. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
.. .. .. .. .. .. ..
I!! .. .. ....~..~.;!.~..~.l!;~..~I;~ r"_
z c
F I ..............1..... .w....... N............... ."
:! ~ c s .........!I..II..~ ....... . ,1,1:'1;,.. t I ." I....
.. .., t;;,. .III;.I~JII:)" II~L. till
R 11 il! J.
"'
..... .. I'l .. If .. .. .. .. '" '" .. .. .., .., OJ Sl .. .. .. .. .. .. c 0 OJ OJ .. ..
J I " .. ~ ~ '" '" .. .. ~ " .. .. '" 0 c '" '" l1: l1: le le ~ Pi 1Il 1Il
11 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ OJ OJ OJ ~ ~ ~ ~ "
- - '" '" ., ., .. .. '" '" ... ... .... .... - - '" '" ., ., .. .. '" '" ... ... .... ....
~
.~ ., ., ., ., ., ., ., ., ., ., ., ., ., ., .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
Ii -
..
N I--
.. w l!! "' w w w ~ w w w w w w
.. w w w ~ ~ w ~ w ~ ~ w ~ w w ~
.. le 0- le le 0- 0- 0- le 0- le 0- 0- 0- le 0- 0- le 0- le
... " " " " " ~ " " " " ~ " " "
0 "' "' It a: It a: a: It a: a: a: a: a: It a: a: a: a: a: a: It a: It It a: It It a:
g N .. > " ! " ! " ! " ! " 11 " ! " ! " 11 .. 11 " ! " 11 " ! " ! " 11
.. il!
0 I ~ :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :>
~ " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " " "
!!i if " if II if " if " if " 5: " if " if II if II if " if " if II 5: " if II
I " " " c " " " " " ~ " " " "
i:i: .. !i " !i " !i " !i :I !i " !i " !i " !i " !i " !i !i " !i " !i " !i "
\
v.
C:XH iI" ,..- TWJ
,-,
'-'.
.-...,
/~-r
Iliil
'" ~ SI l.w,~~l)lll.'1I! ..'~ 'lilt..
_ >-~, ." )...., (R,l;~'i\!l " '11 ',.; "i!"Ilil' 'S!
w w _ ."1'" . "'"' "'I '.. ~~. . ," ,<\( ", I'"
z >- .,. .,.,. .,., ..., "":!!l"!l~
.!~ b~lb w,~,~~~
'!i ~"ClCl"'oEClClo~InCD'"
. .. ~"":~"':Itl~IC!IC!"":-';C!l'o;f'I!~
.~.. I ..... N N l') l') ... ... II) Cl :: po.. ~ :
. I! - ~..
"
"
"
w
~
.
C\I
CD
I
....
~~C/)
C/)WW
->t-
>-<
<t-a:
...JU...J
;:)W<
:tLl--
Ll-U
Wa:
Ll-WW
O...J::E
>CC::E
t-<O
(3t-U
W
t-
<
a:
N
'"
..
:&
o
!l
"
~
;:
or
"'~i
!Eo
w
!~
~ ;j
8 ~ i
I!! ~
~ .".-
II ill ~
~ 0 c
~ ~
H
., for
z f ~
o ~
!i~
~ = i
.. ~ -
~ ~ ~
~ w-;
"' II! 0
ll: :l ~
I!i .
3 '
or
~ ~
o or
"
...
ffi~
p~
:0 ~ c
8 s or
I!!~
~ ; ~
~
i ; ~ '
; . c i
! .. It .!.
. I ~
.0
...
zj:!!c"
;~j:!!*
Iii_;:!,
w ..
"i"""7
I I
n
~
H
-
lli
,
~
I
~
~ ~ ~ ! I t ~ ~ : :
~ ... 0 ~ ~ o. c ~
uu~~~::;;i:~
..
.. "
" -
.0 -n
_ N
- -
....
- ..
.. "l
~ :;
;;
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
I ~ ~ ~ g g ~ ~ ~ R ~ & ! i
; u u ; ; ; $ $ i ~ ~ i i i
t; :; ::! !!
~ ~ ~ Gi
.. . ;; ;;
~ ~ ~ ~ : : i i ~ ~
~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ . , ,
u ~ ; ; ; ; : : $ $
'" ca '" N
f'! ~ II'! CI
~ In .... ..:
~ ~ ; :
~ g ~ ~ : ~ ~ CI N ~
.;.; .; cD ~ 8 ~ ~ ~
~ fl :. :. :: .
;; .. .. ..
"': Si ~ r:3 ~ Ii ;
U ~ i :i :; ~ i :
c .
at ~
;; ;;
N C
'"
C ,..;
;; ;;
. .
N M
.; iii
;; ;;
! :;; R ~
Ii i i :
.. 0 CI .. '"
~~~~;
;; ;; ;; ;; ..
Cl t') .. In ca
C! ~ ... ~ CO<!
N N cD .... CD
~~~~~
" "
c c
N N
;; ;;
~ 0 ~ ~ 0 0 In In 0 0 In In
.; .; c c : : ~ ~ ~ ~ : :
~ ~ ; ; : : i i ~ ~ i i
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ R ~ :
; I ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ N
;; U U : : a : i i ~ :. : : i
~ ~ s a ~ ~ E:; S
liHHH
.. .. .. .. 4111 ..
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ !:i I I Ii Ii
; ; ; ; : :
t') CI . ~ ~. .. ~ N : ~ ~
: ~ ~ : : ~ : : : : ~ s g ~
; ~ ; ; : : I i ~ i i _ _ .._
.. ..
~ ~ ~ ~ : ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;
: ; ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ i
~::l~~::::".-l'(,,\..".
:.:....... ... ...
~ N _ . . N ~ ... ... ... ~ N ~ ...
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
::11==;;;;;;;&
1..1
~ ~ c c ~ ~ c c ~ ~ c 0 ~ ~
10 10 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
..........NNMC')....lt)lt)COCO,....,....
It)lt)lt)lt)lt)lt)lt)lt)lt)lt)lt)lt)lt)lt)
~.:
;:!;
w ~ w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~c ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
i ~ i ~ ~ ~ << ~ ~ ~ << ~ i ~
2 :0 2 :0 2 2 :0 :0 :0 2 2 :0 :0 :0
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
i 2 2 222 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
; i ; i ; ; ; ; ; ; ; i ; ;
g ~ ; m ~ ; I R ~
~ ceo ~ ~ ~ ~ !
U~::~t;:I..
..
" 0
... ..
~ ~
- -
....
.. " N
.. .. ..
i ; ~
;;;
_;ii',",J.{";;: .......i!1i
. ~~. :i~ ~H ~". :~"':: . '~il ::~
... \".. ... ... .. . .. ... ..'ll< r l~'
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
1;1~~l!,;:;I;; ;~,~:;I; ;
i ~ R ~ ~ ~ I ~ ! ~ ~
~ ~ R ~ I ~ ; ~ S I ,
.. ~ ; ; : $ $ i ~ i i
, ~ ~
.. C 0
U.ll.
;; ;; ;;
= = ~ ~ : : ~ ~ i i I I I I
· · I i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ B B ! ~
i i ; ; ~ ~ ; ; : : $ $ i i
t: CfJ ~ II') . 'It 0 ::
lIid:::~:oi
~ ; : : i i i i
IR!l!!1
E~Iii~~~
.. .. .... ..
.......
~ I : ~ ~ :I
:i :i Ii i i i
~ C"J ..,. ~
~ CI! ~ ~
co) ..
;; ;; ;; ;;
N N I") 0
~ '" CD ~
C . . ..
; ; ; u
II') II') I") N . CD ~ II') ~ II') 0 .. . 0
; ~ ; ~ ~ iii : : ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
. .;.;;;; u u u = = =
.. ..
.. ..
.. ..
; ;;
N N CD CD . . 0 0
::::::~~
~ ~ : : $ $ ~ ~
~ ~
c 0
;; ;;
C C
~ :
i i
II :I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ ~ g
; , ~ ~ ~ I : ~ I ~ Iii ~ ~ ;.
.. ~ ; ; : : $ i i i i ; i ;
N N
.. ..
. .
tt tt
: :
! ~
;; ;;
, , = ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ; ; ; ; : : $ $
..,. ..,. N It) II') CI
C! ~ ~ II) ..,. 0
N to CI N II'i .
~ u ; : $ $
M .. .
CI! ~ ~
:. :. I
~ iii
. .
N .
; ;
~ ~ ~
· 8 N
I ;; ;;
- .. ..
~ ~ II)
1Il :l! :!
U:l~
.. .. ..
" " ..
~ ~ ~
.. ... ...
......
<; ~ ;; SI ! ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~ = S ~ ill l'l
10. .... " .... 10. ID. 10.
............ ..
~ ~ : ~ ~ ~ ~ i I ~ ~ I , =
.,..t."':OlONl"i.,;~ci~N";
..........------uuu
_ill
10 10 . 10 _ _ N Nee 10 .10.
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ; = = . ~ ~ ~
..........NNC')M....lt)lt)COCO,....,....
CD CD CD CD CO CD CD CD CD CD CO CD CD CO
w ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ oC _ <C <C <C
~ a: ~ ~ a: It
:0:0 :0 :0 :0 :0
:) ;) ~ ;) :) =:
22222;
2~2~!oC
!i :Ii i 2 2 2
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
It a:: It a:: a: It
:0 ~ 2 ! :0 ~
~ 2. :) :I :) 2
2 :ER:ER
iil;li
w I!!
~ "'
ll: ll:
:0 2
" "
:0 :0
!l! ~
;;; :0
5"
/6-~
EXftlB II .TW"O
~
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
Ij
Meeting Date 07/21/92
ITEM TITLE:
Public Hearing: Consideration of Rate Increase for
Collection and Disposal of Refuse
Resolution ,1~ ~/~ Approving Rate Schedules
:eor Collection and Disposal of Refuse Effective
July 1, 1992 and September 1, 1992
SUBMITTED BY:
Director of Finance~t
~,
city Manager04 '(,..0 ~ (4/5THS Vote: Yes_No-1L)
REVIEWED BY:
.~
Since 1986, Laidlaw Waste Systems, in accordance with the Franchise
Ordinance (Attachment One), has been entitled to request an annual
rate increase for the collection and disposal of refuse by filing
with the City a "Notice of Intention" no later than 45 days prior
to the effective date.
Although Laidlaw notified the city by letter dated January 23, 1992
of its intention to apply for a rate increase to be effective April
1, 1992, the notice was defective in that it did not "contain
accurate and complete information satisfactorily supporting any
increase requested" as required by Section 9.2 of the Franchise
Ordinance. Subsequently, the change in the consumer price index
was published, the County increased landfill rates, and Laidlaw
submitted information regarding their return on investment. The
resulting proposed residential and commercial rate schedules are
discussed below. .
~
This report addresses the current rate increase request from
Laidlaw composed of an increase (based on the change in consumer
price index) in the operating component of the disposal rate,
continuance of the settlement adjustment from last year, and a
pass-through of the City franchise fee increase. It reviews
actions taken by the City Council last year and their impact on the
rate calculation methodology, discusses a recommendation for a two-
tiered rate schedule to be effective July 1, 1992 and September 1,
1992, and reviews the analysis that has been performed and the
rationale for the recommendation.
The reasons' for one rate schedule effective July 1 and a second
rate schedule effective September 1 are as follows:
J:l r IV~
I ~ -If}
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date
J:J
7/21/92
.
1. Last year's increase was effective July 1 and the
calculation of the settlement adjustment for the first
year assumed a 12 month period with the second year
adjustment to begin July 1, 1992.
2. The fee for the County landfill, which is treated as a
pass-through in the calculation of the rate for refuse
collection and disposal, is scheduled to increase
september 1, 1992.
RECOMMENDATION: 'I'
Adopt the Resolution approving the rate schedules to be effective
July 1, 1992, and September 1, 1992.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not Applicable.
DISCUSSION:
I. PREVIOUS YEARS' RATE REVIEWS
The procedure for rate review was initially established by
Ordinance in 1985 and allows for, among other things, a direct
pass-through of landfill cost increases imposed by the County .
of San Diego, as well as pass through of the City Franchise
Fee increase of one-half percent (.5) annually until 1996.
The grantee is also entitled to request an annual rate
increase up to the change in the consumer price index (but not
to exceed 6%) to cover operational cost increases. The
Ordinance allows for the rate request to be administratively
reviewed by the city Manager's office with notification to the
city Council. The city Council may, at its discretion,
require a public hearing for any proposed rate adjustment.
From 1986 through 1990, proposed rate increases coinciding
with the amount of the consumer price increase were reviewed
and approved, with the city council requiring a public hearing
only once during that period.
II. LAST YEAR I S RATE REVIEW
The Ordinance language states that "the amount of the [rate]
increase shall be limited by the percentage increase since
grantee's last rate increase in the San Diego area CPI".
During the evaluation of last year's proposed rate increase,
staff determined that Laidlaw was using a different
methodology to implement rate increases than was intended by
the city when the Ordinance was adopted. Since 1986 the
annual CPI increases had been applied against the total
existing rate which includes components for operating costs, .
landfill fees, and franchise fees.
-If-~ /~-J/
~~,-,._,_.
,-
Page 3, Item
Meeting Date
13
7/21/92
The proper calculation should have been to apply the annual
CPI rate increases only against the component of the rate
covering operating costs and should not have included landfill
costs and franchise fees which are handled separately as
complete pass-through costs.
Laidlaw cooperated with the city in recalculating and
comparing rate increases received since 1986. 1bia
recalculation resulted in a one-time nermanent reduction of
$0.24 in their residential rates. a reduction of annroximatelv
$0.08 ner vard for commercial rat~s.and identified an amount
of $305.000 to be redistributed. At its meeting on August 27,
1991 the City Council approved the following redistribution
method:
a. Using $50,000 to establish a city Waste Management Trust
Fund; and
III.
Using the balance of the settlement adjustment in the
amount of $255,000 (plus future interest earnings) to
offset rate increases for the next three years. sixty
percent was used in the first year (1991-92) to reduce
rate increases and twenty percent is to be applied in
each of the second and third years.
The impact of the offset in the first year was to reduce
the proposed residential rate from $11.51 to $11.25.
CURRENT REOUEST FOR RATE INCREASE
Laidlaw is requesting a two-tier rate increase. The first,
be effective July 1, 1992, reflects the normal adjustment
CPI and pass through of the City franchise fee increase.
second, to be effective September 1, 1992, reflects
increase in the County landfill rate.
to
for
The
the
b.
r
"..-
Attachment TWo indicates the proposed residential and
commercial rate schedules reflecting the adjustments to the
operating, franchise fee, and redistribution components to be
effective Julv 1. 1992.
Attachment Three indicates the proposed residential and
commercial rate schedules reflecting the increase in the
landfill component to be effective Sentember 1. 1992.
The current residential rate of $11.25 per month is made up of
components for recycling, landfill, other (operating),
redistribution adjustment, and franchise fees. Laidlaw is
requesting a rate increase to $11.67 to be effective July 1
reflecting adjustments to the following components:
~ /6 -/.:4
~
Page 4, Item
Meeting Date
1:1
7/21/92
.
An increase of 3.1% based on the most recent change in
consumer price index, to be applied to the other
(operating) rate component of residential and commercial.
b. A pass-through of the increase in the franchise fee from
7 1/2 percent (7.5%) to 8 percent (8%) that is paid to
the City of Chula Vista.
a.
-
c. Inclusion of the second year adjustment, resulting from
the redistribution amount, in order to reduce by $.11 the
amoun~ of rate increase requested.
In addition to the above increases that are proposed to be
effective July 1, 1992, the following component increase is
proposed to be effective September 1, 1992:
d. A proportionate change to the landfill component of 21.7%
reflecting the increase in the County landfill rate from
$23.00 per ton to $28.00 per ton.
This adjustment for the landfill rate increase has the effect
of increasing the residential rate to $12.41 per month.
IV. JUSTIFICATION FOR RATE INCREASES
a. Conformance with Ordinance .
Last year the city Council adopted Ordinance No. 2475
which clarified the methodology for calculating future
rate increases for the collection and disposal of refuse.
The Ordinance identifies the rate as being made up of
different components and indicates how each component can
be adjusted.
Laidlaw has conformed with the Ordinance by submitting
schedules showing the components of the rate and
adjusting each component in accordance with the
Ordinance. The other (operating) component is proposed
to be adjusted by 3.1% which staff has verified is the
most recent increase in the CPI, the city franchise fee
is proposed to increase from 7.5% to 8.0%, a portion of
the agreed upon redistribution amount is being used to
offset the proposed rate increase, and the landfill
component is proposed to increase by 21. 7% reflecting the
County's increase in fees.
b. Comoarison Rate Survev
During the August 27, 1991 public hearing on last year's
rate increase, Council specifically requested that the
comparison rate survey data in future presentations
equalize rates as much as possible. Since rates .
throughout the county are based on any number of
JH
~
/f-/3
,-
Page 5, Item
Meeting Date
13
7/21/92
variables, the concern was to not be "comparing apples
and oranges". The rate survey data shown in Attachment
Four -A presents the raw "database" information on the
17 cities, and then compares adjusted rates for Chula
vista and some cities using two comparisons.
In the first comparison (Attachment Four - B\, Chula
Vista is compared with five other cities which have
similar service as defined by the following criteria: a
single contractor provides service, the rate includes a
franchise fee as a percent of receipts, and the
contractor incurs all costs associated with billing
customers and collecting bad debts. Comparison rates
used do n2t include landfill fee increases for any city.
,-
In the second comparison (Attachment Four- C\, Chula
Vista's proposed adjusted rate is compared only to cities
with a single provider and rates which include franchise
fees. The results of this broader comparison do not
substantively differ from the six-city comparison of
similar service. This information is presented as
further validation that we can accurately assess how the
proposed rates for Chula vista compare around the County.
In general, the results show that Chula Vista rates are
second highest for residential refuse and recycling
combined, and lowest (or next to lowest) in recycling
alone and commercial refuse. However, when Chula Vista's
"weighted average" rate is compared to the five other
cities with similar service (Attachment 4-B\, the results
are significantly different. Laidlaw's rates would then
be near the average for refuse and recycling (combined)
and refuse only, and would continue to be the lowest
recycling only rate.
The "weighted average" reflects Chula Vista's unique rate
structure which provides residential discounts for multi-
family units, trailer parks and condominiums, and senior
citizens. No other cities surveyed have a comparable
comprehensive discount rate structure for residential
service. In response to Council's concern for comparable
rate information, Chula Vista's "weighted average" rate
is only displayed on the rate survey Attachment 4-B.
It is also noted that a number of cities are expecting
rate increases (other than landfill fees) in the near
future and it is not possible to project how those
changes may affect the comparisons.
,-
~ /6-/'1
Page 6, Item
Meeting Date
1.3
7/21/92
.
c. Return On Investment
During last year's consideration of a.rate increase for
Laidlaw, Council requested staff to include with this
year's report information regarding Laidlaw's rate of
return and other financial information.
Attachment Five is two letters from Laidlaw in response
to the Council's request. Although these letters are
marked "Confidential", Laidlaw has agreed to their
inclu~ion as attachments to the staff report.
"
The first letter addresses their return on investment
(ROI). Their estimated ROI for the twelve months ended
March 31, 1992 for the commercial and residential Chula
Vista Franchise is 5.8%. Staff have requested details of
the ROI calculation, however, Laidlaw's position is that
the information is proprietary and cannot be provided
without a confidentiality agreement, an agreement which
the City Attorney has advised to be inappropriate for the
city.
The second letter addresses Laidlaw's operating costs and
estimates that their direct operating costs for the total
Chula vista Division increased by 3.5% for the past year. .
Laidlaw also mentions they have been downsizing their
organization and there is a freeze on their management
salaries.
V. OTHER ISSUES
a. Effective Date of Rate Increase
The attached Rate Schedules reflect proposed rates that
are recommended to be effective July 1, 1992 and
September 1, 1992. Laidlaw initially requested and has
argued that the rates should be effective April 1 because
that was the effective date historically (except for last
year when the effective date was July 1 because of
prolonged negotiations) and that the three months delay
results in over $50,000 lost revenue to them for this
year and each subsequent year.
Staff's response is that an April 1 effective date is not
required by the Franchise Ordinance. The Ordinance makes
reference to "no more than one such increase. may be
implemented in anyone .calendar year... II . All the
information needed in order to evaluate Laidlaw's
proposed rate increases was not available in time to meet
an April 1 effective date, therefore, staff is .
recommending the July 1 effective date.
-f;3-t;
~-\O
/~-;>
,...
Page 7, Item
Meeting Date
1:1
7/21/92
b. Settlement Ad;ustment
As mentioned previously, a settlement adjustment of
$255,000 was identified last year to be used to offset
residential and commercial rate increases over a three
year period. Sixty percent was used in the first year to
mitigate rate increases and twenty percent is to be
applied in FY 1992-93 and FY 1993-94.
For the first year (1991-92) this resulted in a reduction
of $0.26 to the residential rate. The balance of the
settlement adjustment after the first year is estimated
to be $120,000 including interest earnings. Applying 50%
($60,000) of this amount toFY 1992-93 results in a
reduction of $0.11 to the proposed residential rate.
This is indicated on Attachment Two in the column titled
"Less Settlement Year 2 Adj".
c.
Franchise Fee
Section 4 of the Franchise Ordinance provides that the
City's franchise fee increases by one-half percent (0.5%)
each year until it reaches a maximum of 10%. This is a
"pass through" cost for Laidlaw.
,...
The current franchise fee of 7.5% is scheduled to
increase to 8.0% as of July 1, 1992, as part of the pass
through rate increase requested by Laidlaw.
For Council information, if the franchise fee were
temporarily frozen at 7.5%, then the residential rate to
be effective July 1 would be $11. 61 instead of the
proposed $11.67. The resulting loss in revenue to the
city for FY 1992-93 by not increasing the franchise fee
would be approximately $40,000.
d. Recvclina Rates
The residential curbside recycling rate is recommended to
remain at $1.10 per household per month (inClUding
franchise fee) although it should be recognized as a
newly calculated rate rather than a continuation of the
same rate components. Council may recall that a
recycling rate calculation factors in more than the basic
cost of service.
r-.
That basic cost is adjusted by components which estimate
revenue from the sale of materials collected curbside, as
well as a "landfill diversion credit" offered by the
city's refuse hauler since recycled material does not
require a landfill fee for dumping. In addition, any
grants received by the wastehauler for the curbside
program are applied to partially reduce the rate to the
J3-?
"7
Jt.,.- I t
)b-//?
Page 8, Item
Meeting Date
13
7/21/92
.
customer. Finally, starting in the second year of the
program, there is application of an adjustment based on
the past year's actual experience of material sales
(revenue) and landfill diversion credit (participation)
compared to the original estimates.
During the first year of the curbside program, the city
witnessed serious drops in the market prices (revenue) as
many other California cities instituted programs and the
amount, of market supply soared. On the other hand,
partidipation in the Chula Vista program was higher than
originally anticipated, allowing for a higher landfill
diversion credit. The tremendous success of the curbside
program is primarily responsible for allowing the newly
calculated rate to remain at a $1.10 rate (including the
franchise fee), even though this rate includes a 3.1% CPI
increase on operating costs per the franchise agreement.
The proposed rate of $1.10 is the lowest rate in the
County for service which is not subsidized by commercial
refuse rates or hauler-provided incentives.
It is also important to highlight that the basic cost of
service has always included $.10 per household per month
for public education purposes because of the critical .
importance of that process. It is recommended that the
allocation continue ($ .10 of the $1.10 collected) but the
management of the program and the funds would shift from
Laidlaw to the City, under the direction of the
Conservation Coordinator. This shift would result in
approximately $27,000 annual revenue to the City to be
used for public education programs. Since the city has
established a recycling program infrastructure, this
action would not result in additional staff. However,
the funds would be used for offsetting the cost of
existing staff time, as well as mailers, presentations
and demonstrations, handouts and materials to reach the
ci ty I s 24,000 participants. The public education aspect
of the curbside program is particularly important at this
time (even though participation has been high) because of
the mandatory Ordinance. In addition, the State has
mandated 25% diversion goals' by 1995.
FISCAL IMPACT:
If Council approves the proposed rate schedules which include a
pass-through of the franchise fee increase from 7.5% to 8.0%, the
.city will receive an estimated $670,000 in franchise fee revenue
for FY 1992-93. Of that amount, approximately $40,000 is resulting
from the one-half percent increase.
.
~ /~~/7
~
.
.
.
RESOLUTION NO. 1~7/'1
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING, AFTER
PUBLIC HEARING, RATES FOR COLLECTION AND
DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 1992,
AND SEPTEMBER 1, 1992. '
WHEREAS, on or about July 28, 1982, the City adopted Ordinance
No. 1993 providing for a franchise for the collection of trash in
the City of Chula Vista, which ordinance was amended in March, 1985
by Ordinance No. 2104 and again in August, 1991 by Ordinance No.
2475 ("Trash Franchise Ordinance"); and,
WHEREAS, sedtion 9.2 of the Trash Franchise Ordinance permits
either party, upon filing a notice of intention, to modify rates
subject to certain terms and conditions; and,
WHEREAS, subparagraph 5 of Section 9.2 of the Trash Franchise
Ordinance provides that the city Council has the right, within
twenty (20) days after the commencement of said notice, to request
a public hearing in which case said proposed rate increases shall
be subject to and shall not be instituted until review and written
approval by the city Council; and,
WHEREAS, Laidlaw has requested a rate increase pursuant to the
provisions of Section 9.2 of the Trash Franchise Ordinance and has
issued its notice of intention in that regard, and within the
prescribed twenty (20) day period of time, the city Council has
requested a public hearing for the purpose of reviewing said rates,
notice of which has been duly and timely provided to the
franchisee; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has conducted a public hearing on
July 21, 1992 pursuant to the provisions of paragraph 5 of Section
9.2 of the Trash Franchise Ordinance for the purpose of reviewing
and approving the proposed rate structure and rate increase
request;
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, ORDER AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1.
The residential and commercial rates
identified on Attachment 2 (Attachment 1
omitted) as proposed for July 1, 1992 for the
collection and disposal of refuse are hereby
approved and said rates shall be in effect as
of July 1, 1992.
1'- ~O
..-\'
SECTION 2.
SECTION 3.
SECTION 4.
Presented by
The residential and commercial rates
identified on Attachment 3 as proposed for
Septembe~ 1, 1992 for the collection and
disposal of refuse are hereby approved and
said rates shall be in effect as of September
1, 1992. .
This resolution shall take and be in full
force and effect immediately upon the passage
and adoption hereof.
The City Clerk shall certify to the passage
and adoption of this Resolution; shall enter
the same in the book of original Resolutions
of said City; and shall make a minute of the
passage and adoption hereof in the minutes of
the meeting at which the same is ssed and
adopted.
-f;
Lyman Christopher
Finance Director
C:\rs\laidlaw
Bruce M. Boogaa
city Attorney
J t?CJ-(
-..
~
-..
o. 0" f"
.'.
LAIDLAW TRASH FRANCHISE ORDINANCE
~O COLLECT AND DISPOSE OF REFUSE AND
~O USE THE PUBLIC STREETS AND PLACES
WITHIN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA FOR
SAID PURPOSE
Section 1. Definitions.
.
Whenever in this ordinance the words or phrases
hereinafter in this section defined are used, they shall
have the respective meaning assigned to them in the
following definitions (unless in the given instance, the
context wherein they are used shall clearly import a
different meaning):
(a) wGranteeW shall mean Laidlaw Waste Systems, Inc.
and its lawful successors or assigns.
(b) 'City. shall mean the City of Chula Vista, a
municipal corporation of the State of California in its
present incorporated form or in any later reorganize..:,
consolidated, enlarged or reincorporated form.
(c) WStreets. shall mean the public streets, ways,
alleys and places as the same.now or may hereafter exist
within said city, including state highways now or
'hereafter establishing within,said City. .
'.
, '
.
(d) .Gross Receipts. shall mean all gross operating
revenues received by Grantee from the collection and
disposal of refuse or collection and sale of recyclable
materials.
(e) .Recyclable Materials. or .Recyclables. shall mean
newsprint, glass, aluminum and metal cans, mixed
plastics (to include PET and HOPE), and other such
materials as mutually agreed upon in writing by the
Grantee and the City, which are collected by the Grantee
pursuant to Section 21. (o~tl. 1'1'13; c:J"IJO; ~'td7)
Section 2. Purpose.
.
~he franchise to collect and dispose of refuse and to
collect recyclable materials within the City of Chula
Vista and to use for such purposes the public streets,
ways and places within said City is hereby granted to
Laidlaw Waste Systems, Inc., its successors and assigns.
-1;1" -- ;2;;2. .
ATTACHMENT ONE
_ u____________._.___
Section 3.
Term.
'.
The franchise term shall be extended for the term of
five (5) years from and after the current termination
date of September 4, 1987 or until the state or some
municipal or public corporation duly authorized by law
shall purchase by voluntary agreement all property
actually used and useful in the exercise of said
franchise, or until said franchise shall be forfeited
for noncompliance with its terms as provided herein.
In addition, the grantee shall have two five-year
renewal options if the grantee is not in breach of this
ordinance and has performed in the manner found
satisfactory by the City. The five-year extension and
the two five-year options are conditioned upon the
grantee constructing a new operating service facility
within the City of Chula Vista wi thin fifteen (15)
months of the adoption of this ordinance. Said
facility including land and improvements to cost
approximately $1.5 million. During such term, grantee-
shall have the exclusive right to collect and dispose
of all refuse created, accumulated or produced within
the City of Chub Vista. (ORC. I'lQ3; ~IO~)
Section 4.
Consideration.
.
The grantee of said franchise shall during the term
thereof pay to the City four and one-half percent
(4-1/21) of the gross annual receipts of said grantee.
City is authorized to increase said fee up to a maximum
amount of ten percent .llOl). Beginning April 1, 1986,
-- ..-----.- --"'--~------
the franchise fee shall be increased by one-half
percent (1/21) and one-half percent (1/21) each year
thereafter until it reaches a maximum of ten percent.
It is understood that any increase in the franchise fee
by the City shall be cause for the grantee to increase
charges in order to "pass through" the cost of the
franchise fee. < oR.l:l . /qq.3; <:!) 10*)
.
SECTION 5. Reports, Dates of Payment and City Audit.
The Grantee shall file with the Director of Finance of
said City on a monthly basis commencing on August 1, 1982, and
monthly thereafter, a duly verified statement showing in detail
the total gross receipts of such Grantee during the preceding
month or fractional month from the collection and disposal of
refuse within said City. Grantee shall pay to said City within
fifteen (15) days after the time of filing of such statement, in
lawful money of the United States, the aforesaid percentage of its
gross receipts for such month, or such fractional month, covered
by such statement. Any neglect, omission or refusal by Grantee to
file such verified statement or to pay such percentage at the time
and in the manner specified shall be grounds for the declaration
of a forfeiture of this franchise and all rights of Grantee
hereunder. (oQ.C. ,q 'l.3)
. -- ----
.
-2-
!~'..2;J
-,.- -
.~._..._....- .~. ..~._- ", -' ~...
ATIACHME~I ONE,f,,"~i
~_._---~..----- .
.
.
'.
SECTION 6.
Compliance with Laws.
Grantee shall comply with all laws and regulations of
the State of California and the City of Chula Vista. Further
Chapter 8.24 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code is expressly made a
part of this franchise and incorporated it herein by reference as
if set forth in full. Grante~ il?.9 ~,i.ty.~g.~==_~o})eu_bound by all
provisions of such ordinance, or,any amendments thereto, or other r
ordinances that might affect the collection or disposal of refuse
in the City. It is understood that said ordinances are intended
to be minimum standards and that higher standards and regulations
may be required under the franchise. (oRC. WU)
SECTION 7.
Obligations of Grantee.
Grantee undertakes and agrees, for the consideration
hereinafter mentioned, to furnish: all labor, equipment, and
vehicles (including adequate equipment and vehicles in a standby
capacity to provide the service herein required in the event of a
breakdown of equipment); insurance and bonds necessary to insure
the efficient and timely picking.up, collecting, removing and
disposing of City refuse, and to collect, pick up, remove and
dispose of, all refuse which is generated or accumulated by or
upon all property within the City during the time that this
franchise is in effect, except as herein otherwise provided and
subject to and in accordance with the terms and provisions hereof.
,
The collection and removal of said refuse by Grantee
shall be, at all times during the term of this franchise performed
to the satisfaction of the City Manager or his delegate who shall
have the right to issue orders, directions and instructions to
Grantee from time to time with respect to the collection, transpor-
tation, and removal of refuse, the performance of Grantee's
serVices hereunder, and the Grantee's compliance with the
provisions of the ordinances of the City of Chula Vista as they
now exist or may from time to time be amended, 'and Grantee agrees
to comply therewith. Such collection and removal of refuse shall
be done in a prompt, thorough, lawful and workmanlike manner. -',
Grantee shall SUbmit a detailed plan of operation prior
to beginning of his work pursuant to this franchise. It shall
describe the routes to be established and shall contain details
regarding servicing schedules, the equipment to be used, and
alternate procedures to be followed in the event of severe weather
or equipment failures.
Grantee shall provide and maintain at his own expense, a
solid waste collection system capable of providing service to all
entities in'the City requiring, or required to avail itself of
said service. Not less than one regular weekly collection shall
be provided to each residential unit. Grantee shall provide bins
as required for commercial custo~ers or whenever other customers
-3-
16~02cj
"""""AC . M T."" E ,. ;.''Ii!;,-' f
." ,; "I:tEN.~I'I:":;',i:';~
~-
'...,:-
I
.
of Grantee request. their use. Each bin shall be placed in an
accessible, outside location on a hard surface according to
individual agreement.
Grantee shall provide collection vehicles and equipment
in amounts adequate to perform in accordance with ~ts operational
plan. Initially, and throughout the franchise term, the average
age of all regularly assigned collection vehicles must be not more
than four (4) years, and all must be radio controlled. Collection
vehicles, containers, and other contractor furnished equipment
must comply with the standards set forth in the Chula Vista
.Iunicipal Code.
All refuse collected by Grantee shall become the
property of Grantee immediately upon the collection thereof, and
shall be forthwith removed and transported by Grantee to an
approved place of disposal, which shall be provided, arranged for
or furnished by Grantee.
.
In the event Grantee fails, refuses, or neglects to
collect and dispose of refuse set out or placed for collection at
the time and in the manner herein required, City may collect and
dispose of the same or cause the same to be collected and disposed
of and Grantee shall be liable for all expenses incurrred in con-
nection therewith. Such remedy of City shall be cumulative and in
addition to any and all other remedies it may have in the event of
such failure, refusal or neglect of Grantee. The collection and
disposal of refuse by City or by others as aforesaid shall not be
deemed an election of remedies which shall preclude City from
availing itself of additional remedies for Grantee's breach of
contract.
The following shall be considered legal holidays for _.',
purposes of this agreement: New Year's Day, Memorial Day,
Independence Day, Labor Day, Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day.
Any other days must have prior.written approval from the City.
When a regularly scheduled residential collection falls on a legal
holiday, the collection for that day and succeeding days of that
week shall be rescheduled one day later. Holiday disruptions of
commercial collections shall be handled in a manner mutually
agreeable to the Grantee and individual customers.
Grantee agrees to provide and maintain litter containers
for the use of the general pUblic for public areas such as plazas
and rights-of-way other than parks and those publicly owned
facilities maintained by the city as specifically designated by
resolution of the city and to e~pty and dispose of the contents as
necessary.
.
-4-
: )6roZS-
ATTACHMENT ONE
.... ... .....
.
c-
c-
.- .
j ,
~.
Grantee shall prepare and furnish to all customers not
less than four (4) days prior to the beginning of or change in
service, schedules setting forth the days on which the collections
shall be made. Notice shall be in such form as is first approved
by the City Manager or his delegate. (OR~. /qq3)
SECTION 8. Disposal Requirements.
Grantee shall be obligated as set forth hereinabove to
provide for the collection and the disposal of all refuse within
the City of Chula Vista, provided, however, Grantee shall under-
take the disposal of said refuse in accordance with specific
direction of City if at any time during the period of this
franchise, City shall determine that the public interest requires
a disposal program differing from that which the Grantee has
established. (Ol<-(). /qq.a \ .
Section 9. Rates for Collection.
9.1 Basis for Future Modifications.
The rate charged to, and to be paid by, waste removal ratepayers
("Ratepayers") in the city of Chula Vista, shall be those as may from time
to time be established by Council resolution determined in accordance with
the provisions of this Section. The rates to be charged at the time of
the codification of this ordinance amending this section shall .be those
established by Resolution No. 16301, adopted on August 27, 1991.
9.2 Rate Modification Procedure.
Either Party may, upon filing a notice of intention to modify rates
("Notice of Intention") which contains accurate and complete information
satisfactorily supporting any increase requested, forty-five (45) days in
advance ("Notice Period") with the other Party, modify rates subject to
the following conditions and limitations:
1. Contents of Notice of Intention.
The Notice of Intention shall demonstrate for each type of service
(residential, commercial), the existing rate; that portion of said
rate charged for the purpose of reimbursing the Grantee for
Grantee's landfill costs ("Landfill Rate Component"), that portion
of said rate charged for the purpose of paying the required
franchise fees imposed under the authority of this Ordinance
("Franchise Fee Rate 'Component"), and that portion of said rate
charged for all other purposes ("Other Rate Component"}; the amount
of modification in each component of the rate that is being sought;
the amount of the modification in the entire rate being sought; the
amount of the new Rate Component; the amount of the new rate after
the proposed modification; and the justification for said proposed
modification.
... ..u -5-
/~-~6
ATTACHMENT ONE
2.
.
3.
.
.
4.
Other Rate Component Changes
The ~roportion of modification to the "Other Rate Component" shall
be limited by the proportion of change since grantee's last Tate
increase in San Diego area Consumer Price Jndexi'or all urban
consumers as compiled by the United States Department of labor.
Bureau of Labor Statistics for the latest twelve-month ~eriod for
which statistics are available. In no event shall the amount of the
increase exceed six percent (6%) of the service rates. -
. .
a. In the event that the Consumer Price Jndex referred to in
paragraph 3 above shall no longer be ~ublished. then another
similar generalll recognized index ..y be substituted upon
approval by the ity Manager. .
landfill Rate Component Changes.
The ~roportion of modification to the Landfill Rate Component shall
not exceed the proportion of change since grantee's last rate
increase in the rate charged by the County of San Diego to Srantee
for "tipping fees" at the Otay Landfill. or if the Otay Landfill has
been closed. at the next closest operating landfill. for the latest
twelve-month ~eriod. .
Franchise Fee Rate Component Changes.
The proportion of modification to the Franchise Fee Rate Component
shall not exceed the proportion of change in the Franchise Fee that
is or may be requir~d by law to be paid to the City of Chula Vista.
Increase Approval Hierarchy. . .
Annual modifications which constitqte rate increases shall be
subject to the review and written approval of the City .Manager.
unless the City Council shall. within 20 days ("Public Hearing
Option Period") after the commencement of the Hotice Period set the
rate modification request for public hearing. in which case said
rate increases shall be subject to. and not instituted until. the
review and written approval of the City Council after said public
hearing.
No Publi~ Hearing Approval Procedure.-
If the City Council tas not set a public hearing during the Public
Hearing Option Period. the City Manager shall notify grantee in
writing of his approval or denial of the increase within five (5)
days of the end of the Public Hearing Option Period. _.___ . _ ._
J
=)
.
5.
6:
7.
Notice to Srantee of Public Hearing ~proval Procedure.
The City Council shall havae the unilaterial right to require a
hearing for any rate increase at its discretion. If the City
intends to require a public hearing. it shall notify grantee within
five (5) days after the. !~d ~ft~~.!..u_~l_i_~..~aring Option.P~~~_d.
._--- _.__.._.._..~.....:;---_._-_._..
.
\'
..-.-...- -...
.--..-.---.' ....-.--..- -" -- ,.-
-6-
/br;2 7
ATTACHMENT ONE
.'
.
.
8. Automat;c Approval
, ';-In the absence of any written COlllllunication from the City Manager or
". Council within five (5) days after the end of the Public Hearing
Option Period to the contrary. a modification representing a rate
increase is deemed approved.
9. Frequency of Rate Increase Requests.
No lIlore than one such increase lIay be ill1plemented in anyone
calendar year although grantee shall have at any time the right to
submit a request to the City Council for additional rate relief at
any time extraordinary expenses are incurred. .
-, ,
.
.
.
9.3 Senior Rate Schedules.
The City Council pf the City of Chula Vista lIay at any time., by
amending Chapter 8.24 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code. establish a
program for preferential rates for senior citizens or other
classifications which are deemed to be in the public interest.
9.4 Variable Rate Structure.
Grantee agrees to discuss with the' City the concept. design and
implementation of a change in rate structure from a fixed rate to a rate
structure which would vary based on the number and size of containers, or
such other basis which the City believes would provide an incentive for
waste reduction. (ORD, <:IJ<J,'s, clilOL/. /qq3)
~----!
\
I
SECTION 10.
Insurance and Performance Bond.
Grantee agrees, at Grantee's own expense, to carry
comprehensive public liability and automobile liability insurance
coverage during the full term of this franchise, with City also
named as an additional insured thereunder, covering liability for
bodily injuries, death and property damage, arising out of or in
connection with the operations of Grantee, under this franchise in
an amount not less than $1,000,000 for injuries including death to
anyone person and in an amount not less than $5,000,000 for any
one accident or occurrence, and property damage in an amount not
less than $200,000. Grantee further agrees to carry, at Grantee's
own expense, workers' compensation insurance in accordance with
the laws of the State of California. All of said insurance
policies, or certificates thereof, shall be deposited by Grantee
with the City Manager together with endorsements or statements
from the insuring companies providing that such policies will not
be subject to cancellation, modification or reduction of the
limits of the policy until ninety (90) days after written notice
to the City by registered or certified mail. Such policies shall
guarantee payment of any final judgment rendered against Grantee
or the City within the coverage provided, irrespective of the
financial condition of, or any acts or omissions of, said Grantee.
All of said policies shall be subject to the approval of the City
Attorney.
-7-
/;; ~Y
ATTACHMENT ONE
.
Grantee shall secure and deliver to City Manager a
twelve (12) month performance bond in the amount of $1,000,000 to
secure the full, true and faithful performnce of all their terms,
obligations and conditions of this franchise on the part of'
Grantee. Grantee shall present said bond together with a
certificate from the surety showing payment in full for such bond,
to the City Manager prior to the commencement of operations
pursuant hereto, and provide a one-year renewal and certificate of
payment prior to the start of each year of this agreement.
In the event of the termination or cancellation of the
insurance or bond required hereunder or the failure of Grantee to
provide such other insurance and/or bond as hereinabove provided,
prior to the effective date of such cancellation or termination,
this franchise may be suspended or terminated forthwith by City,
by written notice thereof to Grantee. Any such suspension shall
be for such period or periods as the City Manager from time to
time may determine. No liability or obligation shall be incurred
by City in favor of Grantee by virtue of any such notice or
notices or from any such suspension or termination. In the event
of such suspension or termination by City upon the failure of
Grantee to secure and maintain on file said insurance and/or bond
during the full term of this franchise, Grantee shall be liable
for any and all damages suffered by City arising out of such
suspension or termination. CoIlS:;, Illq3)
SECTION 11.
Hold Harmless.
.
Grantee of the franchise granted hereby shall
indemnify, save and hold harmless, City and any
officers and employees thereof against and from all
damages, judgments, decrees, costs and expenditures
which City, or such officer or employee, may suffer, or
which may be recovered from, or obtainable against
Ci ty, or such officers or employee. for, or by reason
of, or growing out of 'or resulting from the exercising
by Grantee of any or all of the rights or privileges
granted hereby, or by reason of any act or acts of
Grantee or its servants or agents in exercising the
franchise granted hereby, and Grantee shall defend any
suit that may be instituted against City, or any
officer or employee thereof, by reason of or growing
out of or resulting from the exercise by Grantee of any
or all of the rights or privileges granted hereby, or
by reason of any act or acts of Grantee, or its
servants or agents, in exercising the franchise granted
hereby. This hold harmless clause shall apply to any
extension of the franchise. (O~(). WI.3', <::1110,+)
-----...- ---._---_._-_._~-
-8-
.
/~~1
..AJTACHMENT ..oNE.. ._.
, -
SECTION 12.
Obligations of City.
.
Except as hereinafter otherwise provided, Grantee shall
have the sole right to pick up, gather, and remove refuse
generated by residentialL ~~~ commercial, or industrial
property within the City except as otherwise provided in Section
8.24.080 of the Municipal Code and any other amendments thereto
by the City until such time as this franchise is terminated as
herein provided. City will not let any contract to, or enter
into any contract with, any other person, firm, or corporation
for the performance of the services herein required to be
performed by Grantee, except as expressly otherwise herein
.provided, as long as this franchise is in effect.
City shall protect Grantee's rights to such exclusive
contract by proper ordinances, and by reasonable enforcement
thereof. Grantee and Grantor hereby expresslY except herefrom
the picking uP, Jathering, and removal of refuse pursuant to a
competitively bi contract between the Sweetwater Union High
School District and an authorized City trash franchisee. (oll.C. l~q3~ cl3.3.:;t)
SECTION 13.
Miscellaneous.
.
The failure of either party at any time to require
performance by the other of a provision hereof, shall in no way
affect the right of such party entitled to performance to enforce
the same thereafter.. Nor shall the waiver of either party of any
breach of any provisions hereof be construed to be a waiver of
such provisions or of any succeeding breach thereof.
Any notice that may be given to Grantee under or with
respect of this franchise shall be deemed to have been given when
delivered to Grantee or to an officer of Grantee, personally or
when sent to Grantee by registered or certified mail, postage
prepaid, addressed to Grantee at; .
Chula Vista Sanitary Service
311 F Street
P. O. Box 967
Chula Vista, Ca. 92012
I
,
I
I
i
I
!
City reserves the right to determine, in the exercise of
its powers to provide for the public health and welfare, whether
technological or other changes materially affect the necessity of
or level of the service provided for hereunder, and, in such case,
the level of service hereunder shall be adjusted by City, and this
franchise shall be reviewed and revised accordingly. (o~C. ,QQ3)
i
t
!
SECTION 14.
Forfeiture.
~
.
This franchise is granted upon each and every condition
herein contained, and shall ever be strictly construed against
Grantee. Nothing shall pass by the franchise granted hereby to
Grantee unless it be granted in plain and unambiguous terms. Each
of said conditions is a material and essential condition to the
granting of the franchise. If Grantee shall fail, neglect or
refuse to comply with any of the conditions of the franchise
-9-
J~-3CJ
ATTACHMENT ONE
"--_.~-- --- -'_.~-- -----. ----..-
,--.-r---
.
.
.
granted hereby, and'if such failure, neglect or refusal shall
continue for more than thirty (30) days after written demand by
the City Manager for compliance therewith, then City, by the City
Council, in addition to all rights and remedies allowed by law,
thereupon may terminate the right, privilege and franchise granted
in and by this ordinance, and ~ll the rights, privileges and the
franchise of Grantee granted hereby shall thereupon be at an end.
Thereupon and immediately, Grantee shall surrender all rights and
privileges in and to the the franchise granted hereby. No
provision herein made for the purpose of securing the enforcement
of the terms and conditions of the franchise granted hereby shall
be deemed an exclusive remedy or to afford the exclusive procedure
for the enforcement of said terms and conditions, but the remedies
and procedure outlined herein or provided, including forfeiture,
shall be deemed to be cumulative. (oRD, /qq.a)
......
SECTION 15.
--....------
Authority for Grant.
Notwithstanding any other provision herein contained,
this franchise is granted solely and exclusively under Sections
1200, 1201, 1202, 1203, 1204, 1205 and 1206 of Article XII of the
Charter of the City of Chula Vista and no other authority. (OQCl. /qqJ,)
SECTION 16.
Effective Date.
This ordinance shall become effective thirty days after
its final passage unless sus~nded by a referendum petition filed
as provided by law. (01<0. /H.3)
SECTION 17.
Publication Costs.
The Grantee of said franchise shall pay to the City a
sum of money sufficient to reimburse it for all publication
expenses incurred by it in connection with the granting thereof;
such payment to be made within thirty (30) days after the City
shall have furnished such Grantee with a written statement of such
expense. (ORC, /q<u) .'
SECTION 18.
Written Acceptance.
The franchise granted hereby shall not become effective
until written acceptance thereof shall have been filed by the
Gr~~tee with the City Clerk. (ORO /q~)
SECTION 19.
publication.
The City Clerk shall cause this ordinance to-be pub-
lished once within fifreen (15) days ~fter its passage in the
Chula Vista Star News, a newspaper of general circulation
published and circulated in said City. j (ORO, JCj(3)
-~- ~.. ---~._----~ -----.----- -. ~ .._-~ -- ---.. -.-----------..-.--- -- ------
-',
-III-
/;~3/'
ATTACHMENT ONE
..
.
.
Section 20.
Special Events.
Grantee agrees to cooperate with the City in
carrying out special events to improve community
appearance. (oRO. ~,o..)
Section 21. Residential Curbside Recycling Services
Grantee agrees to implement residential curbside
recycling services to all single famil~ homes as follows:
A. Exclusivity The City grants to Grantee the
exclusive right to collect Recyclable Materials
deposited at the curbside of single-family
dwellings in such containers (-Designated Recycling
Container -, or alternatively (-Container -) as are
herein required to be provided within the City
limits, to include all residences receiving refuse
collection and disposal services descr ibed in the
following paragraph B. (l). This does not exclude
duly licensed non-profit organizations and
community groups from conducting recycling programs
for the purpose of raising funds, nor does it
exclude private individuals from selling or
otherwise disposing of their own recyclable
material. Ho~ever, once materials have been placed
at the curb ~n a Designated Recycling Container
provided by the Grantee, the material (-Franchised
Recyclables-) becomes one of the SUbject matters of
this grant of franchise.
t_t~/~/t~$~t;~$/~/tts~t/AAt/_$$~tt/~/t~~
t~tttlt~s/~/~~tttl~~~//~~/~//t;~tf~~/~/~t
t$//~~t//~~tt//~t//t~~//~ttst~~l//t~t~$~//t~ll~ttt~t
tt~nt~t#1
B. Obligations of Grantee
(1)
Collection - Grantee shall collect and remove
all Franchised Recyclables which are placed in
a Designated Recycling Container at the
curbside on public streets, from all
single-family residences. Grantee shall
collect the Franchised Recyclables once each
week, regardless of weather conditions. t~
t~~//;~t;~t/~~tt~~1 Collection will be on
the same day of the week as the regularly
scheduled trash collection day. Grantee and
...
-11-
.
/ b -J.;2
ATTACHMENT ONE
City will mutually agree to any changes in -
collection day. Grantee will notify residents
of any changes in the collection day by
distributing a flyer no later than two weeks
prior to the affected day.
(2) Containers Grantee shall purchase and
distribute recycling containers to be used by
each eligible residential customer included in
the program. The type and cost of container
to be used, or changes of container type shall
be approved by the City prior to purchase and
distribution. Grantee shall retain ownership
of the containers. Each residence eligible to
participate in the program will receive one
container. If Grantee determines that the
volume of recyclable material exceeds the
capacity of the one container, additional
containers shall be provided at no cost to the
resident. Replacement of containers that are
stolen and/or damaged shall be made at no cost
to the resident at Grantee I s discretion.
Grantee will be responsible for keeping
records and making them available to the City
regarding additional containers requested, and
the reason for the request, e.g. damaged,
stolen, needed to handle residence recyclables
beyond capacity of one container.
Transportation of Materials - Grantee &hall
transport collected recyclable materials to a
central collection point and shall retain
responsibility for the sale of such materials
in a timely and efficient manner, so as to
yield the highest possible market value for
the material. .
, ,
.
.
(3 )
(4 )
.
;
"
Missed Pick-Ups - In case of a missed pick-up
called in by a resident, Grantee shall, where
possible, provide collection within 24 hours.
If unable to accommodate due to inadequate
notice, the materials shall be picked up on
the next scheduled collection day and resident
is to be so notified. Information on missed
pick-ups shall be logged by Grantee and shall
be available to the City.
-11-
- /~ <;}
ATTACHMENT ONE
-,
,.-.....-------.-..
.. .....
.
(S) public Awareness program - The city and the Grantee
a ree that a rJ.mar element In encoura Ing
u J.c to a 0 t source re uct on an rec c
a ts s 0 emonstra e e cost 0 rec c
versus t e u J.ma e cos 0 no rec c J.n. 0
en, the Grantee w g g t n t e pu
Awareness Pro ram estimated savings expected
lan J. costs as a resu t 0 rec c n.
ran ee w prepare an n ro uc ory ac et of
information regarding the Citywide single-Family
curbside Recycling program, approved in advance by
the City, and will distribute such packet with the
recycling containers to each eligible residence.
The packet shall include, but not be limited to:
a) An informational brochure that details the
program elements and describes how they can
participate, and -'b) doorknob hangers or other
methods 'encouraging use' of the recycling container
and explaining the program.
The Grantee will assist with media events, make
presentations to community groups and businesses on
an as needed basis, and attend county wide meetings
related to recycling, speaking on the City'S
curbside Recycling Program if needed. The Grantee
also agrees to assist in developing incentives to
increase participation and tonnage collected, and
to encourage involvement of community and youth
groups.
The Grantee and the City agree that the main
purpose of an aggressive public education program
is to increase participation and diversion.
Beginning in the second year, if, in the City's
judgment, it is reasonably determined that the
public education effort has not resulted in high
, .
.
enough program interest, the Grantee will
reasonable public education acti vi ties
City's direction at a cost not to exceed
the monthly billing.
perform
at the
$.10 of
--.----..--
.
(6) Local Manager - The Grantee shall at all times
during the term of this agreement have a local
manager charged with the responsibility for
supervision of the recycling operations and
obligations of the Grantee.
C. Obligations of City - The City shall have lead
responslbJ.1J.ty tor directing the development and
expenditures of the public Awareness Program as
provided in paragraph B.(S). The City also agrees
to take such steps as may be reasonablY necessary
to protect recyclable materials placed at the
curbside for collection ,by Grantee under the terms
of this Agreement and shall deliberate upon the
merits of enacting and reasonably enforcing an
anti-scavenging ordinance.
.
ATTACHMENT ONE
---..........--~---.-----...,.-
/b'JY'
-13-
I ,
D. FUnding and Rates for Collection
(1)
.
(a)
"~'..
.
Funding Sources The residential curbside
collect10n program will be funded by four
sources: a monthly recycling fee to all
eligible residents I revenue from the sale of
collected recyclable material! savings in
disposal cost of material diverted from the
landfill! and grant funds when available and
awarded.
A monthly recycling fee charged to eligible
residents is the primary source of funding for
this program. - In general, it will be
allocated equally among the customer base
receiving said recycling service and will be
determined by the Grantee's operating expenses
directly attributable to the recycling
program, less: revenue received from the sale
of collected recyclable material, the savings
realized in disposal costs of material
diverted from the landfill, and application of
grant funds. The Grantes will use the billing
system to demonstrate that material sales,
landf1ll diversion credi ts and rants reduce
t e ro ram s 0 erat ona costs. T e ur ose
o Frov1 ng s norma on s or e
ubl c to continue to see how divertin waste
rom t e an as resu t 0 recyc n
pro uces sav1ngs. Spec c ee norma on s
outlined in paragraph D.(2) below.
_.---_.~'---~-
(b) All collected recyclable.mpterial will be
sold at fair market value and revenues
obtained from such sales shall be
retained by Grantee as an offset against
operating expenses.
(c) Recyclable materials collected in the
program will be diverted from disposal in
the landfill, thereby resulting in a cost
savings to Grantee (WLandfill Diversion
CreditW). On a monthly basis, Grantee
will determine the recycled material
tonnage collected and the resulting
Landfill Diversion Credit and will credit
this savings during the first year of
operation as an offset against operating
expenses'" When reevaluating program
costs in subsequent years, the City
agrees to consider Landfill Diversion
Credi ts of less than 100\. The amount
will be subject to negotiation and the
intent is to provide an economic
incentive for .the Grantee towards
increased participation and program
success.
...
.
-JH-
J6~;JS
..-.------...------...- -..~.>--_.- ---,
ATTACHMENT ONE
\ '
..
(d) Any grant funds received will be applied
to the costs of the program when award is
noticed or during the next rate review
procedure if the award takes place once a
specific rate has been determined, with
the intent of directly reducing the
monthly fee to the homeowner.
(2) Rates for Collection - It is the City's intent
to ensure that the rates charged to the
citizens for the recycling program are
appropriate and equitable. Based on
experience gained in the city's pilot curbside
and other recycling programs, the recycling
fee for the first period of operations will be
$1.10 per month, billed quarterly in the same
manner as the trash collection fee. The
monthly fee of $1.10 per residence will be the
established fee for the period beginning
February 1, 1991 ~hrough March 31, 1992.
Specific rate review procedures will be
prepared by the City and will be used with the
concurrence of the Grantee in consideration of
all requests for rate adjustments by the
Grantee. Rate review will include adjustments
for actual sale of materials and landfill
diversion credits in previous period compared
to original estimated amounts. Shortfalls or
overages will be used in determining rates for
upcoming periods. Rate review will be
conducted annually beginning in January 1992,
and will be concluded prior to the
notification deadline for the 45 day notice of
the annual CPI increase for refuse collection
as referenced in section 9 of the franchise as
amended .by Ordinance NO. 2104, Rates for
collection. An increase in rates for
recycling services will be subject to the same
limitations and conditions for refuse
collection rates listed in section 9.
By amending Chapter 8.24 of the Chula vista
Municipal Code, the City may establish a
program for preferential rates for senior
citizens or other classifications which are
deemed to be in the public interest. The
program parameters and rate structure will be
determined by the City with the concurrence of
the Grantee which concurrence shall not be
unreasonablY withheld.
"
.
.
~..:.
.
-15-
Jtb"Yt,
_ _ ____"..._,__u___ _ ---.-..---
-y-
..ATTACHRrnT~-----
.
.
.
All changes to a preferential rate will be
subject to the rate review and notification
procedures referenced in this paragraph as
well as the limitations and conditions for
refuse collection rates listed in Section of
Ordinance No. 2104.
E.
Reports - Grantee shall file with the City written
quarterly and annual reports of Grantee's
performance under this agreement as follows:
(1)
Quarterly Project
(15) worKing (fays
quarter, Grantee
project _ report to
to the following:
(a) Summaries of tonnage of all recyclable
materials recovered, by material.
Reports Within fifteen
after the last day of each
shall submit a quarterly
include but not be limited
(b) Summaries of tonnages of all recyclable
materials sold, by material.
(c) Market price for all recyclable materials
collected from the curbside and sold by
Grantee. The weight receipts shall be
available for inspection by the City.
(d) Resident participation rates in terms of
weekly set-out counts.
(e) Overall assessment of performance -during
the quarter.
(f) Discussion of problems and noteworthy
experiences in program operation.
(g) Recommendations to increase tonnage --of
recyclable materials recovered.
(2) Annual Report - On or before July 31 of each
year of the term of this agreement, Grantee
shall submit a fiscal year-end annual report
to include but not be limited to the fOllowing:
(a)
A collated summary of the information
contained in the quarterly reports, and a
summary of the participation rates and
tonnages of recovered material.
-1(0-
//:<5 ?
ATTACHMENT ONE
,,"- _...--,;.-.-- ~.,--_._---"., _.__.-.._-----
y---.-.--.. -
,
!
i
,1
!
i
i
I
I
I
!
I
, .
.
.....
.,
(b) A report of public awareness activities
and their impact on participation and
recovered volumes.
...
(c) A report of highlights and other
noteworthy experiences, measures taken to
resolve problems, increase efficiency and
household participation.
(d) Additional information as necessary to
meet State and/or Federal mandated
reporting requirements.
F. Performance Standards - This Agreement for curbside
recycling serv1ces 1s subject to the performance
standards and franchise conditions detailed in
Section 14 Forfeiture of the franchise, (Ordinance
No. 1993). Wh11e it is the intent of Section 21 to
describe specific recycling collection services to
be provided by the Grantee in addition to existing
refuse collection and disposal services, Grantee
agrees that acceptable performance of recycling
services will be considered severable from this
agreement.
G. Additional Franchise Fee - The Grantee, as part of
the consideration of this agreement, agrees to pay
to the City an additional franchise fee at a rate
consistent with that paid for refuse collection and
detailed in Section 4 Consideration of the
franchise, as amended by Ordinance 2104. This rate
will begin at seven percent (7') of the annual
receipts collected by said Grantee within the City
of Chula Vista from residents for the recycling
program within the City. Beginning April 1, 1991,
the franchise fee shall be increased by one-half
percent (1/2') and one~half percent (1/2') each
April thereafter until it reaches a maximum of ten
percent. It is understood that any increase in the
franchise fee by the City shall be cause for the
Grantee to increase charges in order to .pass
through. the cost of the franchise fee.
H. Term - It is the intent of the City that the term
~the provision of Residential Curbside Recycling
Services shall be to the year 2002, subject to a
two year notice of cancellation by the City without
cause which cannot be tendered sooner than the end
of the third year. The services remain cancellable
for cause at any time.
-1;- /t6 fY'
---:,_.__._-. __ .... .. .:1-..... -----------,---
ATTACHMENT ONE
. .
-.
I. Recycling Program Expansion - It is the City's
intention to develop a comprehensive recycling
program to reduce the amount of material being
disposed of in County landfills and to comply with
the mandates of the California Integrated Waste
Management Act of 1989 (AB 939). Both parties
hereby agree that the City may not go out to bid
for the expansion of this recycling program to
other land uses (e.g., multiple family, commercial,
industrial) or other recyclable materials (e.g.,
yard waste, etc.) until after the City has met and
conferre~ with Grantee with regard to its intent to
do so.l,~separate amendments to the agreement for
refuse ll.collection and disposal are not negotiated
between the City and the Grantee, the City may g~
out to separate bid. (ORll. ~<-I/o j ~~~.., i ~'+Olq)
Ordinance No. 1993 adopted August 3, 1982
Ordinance No. 2104 adopted March 5, 1985
Ordinance No. 2332 adopted September 12, 1989
. Ordinance No. 2410 adopted October 16, 1990
Ordinance No. 2427 adopted November 27, 1990
Ordinance No. 2429 adopted December 4, 1990
.
-11-
/6rJ(
ATTACHMENT ONE
----.-..-.--- .,"-
~.....i..........~ II N 8 ~ ~ II ~ N ~ ~ ~ ; 8 ~
~ I li Ii Ii Ii Ii Ii li Ii Ii ;; ;; Ii ;;
w>~_:_;-;
.
IJ............... <i ==
~ ~ ~ ~ 5 ; ~ 111 ~ [TI ! ~ IB
~ Ii ~ ~ Ii w ~ " ~ i ~ !l
- ;; - - ;; ;; ;;
I..... 1 "
...~ .....~ - ~ iO ~ ~ - !i W Ii ~
gF~w a a a a a a a i a i
ri~!i
i.... ..~
!i~ R ~ IB , R ~ 1 - ~ a ~ ~
a ~ I
Ii <l : II Ii II Ii i !l ~ . ~
- - ;;
~ i
~ - -
~ :l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ II II a ~ t
~.. i Ii Ii Ii Ii Ii Ii Ii Ii Ii w w
;; ;;
i ......: -
~ III ~ 8 ~ R ~ ~ 8 IB = ; ~ ~ & ~ ~
Ii Ii Ii . Ii Ii Ii li Ii Ii Ii . II
c - -
~ w
w
~ ~
r~ ==
8 8 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 8 8 R R II ~ .
11 ~ Ii Ii Ii li Ii Ii Ii Ii Ii Ii Ii
f1 w
w
(j ~ ~
N .. D - -
'" 0 R ~ ; c R ~ ~ , ~ ~ ~ II ~
I g 11' - Ii Ii Ii Ii Ii Ii Ii Ii Ii Ii Ii Ii
~ i ~ ~
I
<( t- en o ... ==
I- W W
> I- ~ S . ~ 8 ~ I S ~ ~ I ~ IB ~
" . ~
i= <( i II Ii . :l Ii Ii ~ Ii lIi II II ~
~ ;; - ;;
<( l..) a:
..J w ..J 0 .
=> u. <( ~ --'- - ~ - -
J: u. i=
l..) w ~ ;j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ II II ~ ~ ~
z ~ i :l :l Ii Ii Ii Ii Ii Ii Ii N N :l II ~
u. w w ~ ;; ;;
0 ..J C 8
lD Cii i
~ <( fi - -
I- W 111 ~ q ~ I 111 I ~ ~ ~ a I 8 R
5 w a: Ii Ii ;; Ii Ii Ii Ii Ii Ii Ii ;; Ii
!/ ~
I- ~ ~
<( ~
a: - f-
! ~ I 8 8 ~ " ~ : ~ ; ~ ~ Ii ~
!< s .
; Ii ~ Ii Ii ~ ~ i ~ !l
, ;; ;; ;; ;;
i ~ - -
! c =",.:;.:
=~ .. i~
... !ii ~ N . Z ~ ~ ~ N ~ a: , A N ~ ~
~ .. Ii Ii 0 Ii Ii Ii Ii /w Ii Ii Ii Ii Ii
~ !i :~ ....0.
~ ,.e,_
l..) .'W
- ~ 0 .0 .. .. "i -;;-
. ~ ,:;;..1 ;; IB ~ - ! ..s; ~ 111 c 8 i
i !< s " " - ~
I ~ :.:.J c II Ii .tt: ~ lli ~ ~ ~ Ii
...~ i . ;; - ;; ;; ;; w ;;
~ <(
, .tt: :'{/) .:;;
c I- /~
- - 10 ..<( - - :.:J
! ..l..) .0: .<(
<~ ...~ .(.!) ....~
I {/) ...~.
:..J .0 ;::Q.; ~ ..=>
g w
l- s; :l~ 2 0
iti ~ ...~ .15 ...~ II .z
I- ~ .z 0 /0 !
u .<l\ .:- ~ ...~ ~ z
Z .
w cn cn S .0 /<(
=> ~ .l<: " .l<: r .:~
:.:J 0 tt: ~ i ~ s ~ tt: ~ d I!! .<( 8 ~ ~
~ <( " <( r <( z 11 .W I I 0 ~ w
.1= ~ .ll. g ~ a ill. I g ...~ :a: "- r ~
'" ! !5 " w
~ Z tt: " '" ..0: .a:: '''w ~ '"
f! '" ~ ~
.w . ::'W ~ '" ~ ~ ~ W ~ /0 .:::5 Ii ~ ;
> S! Cl ~ !S --' ~ ~ ~ "-:..J .:::5
" I lii !!l .<1: ~ w ~ ..<1: Z i i II ~ ~ ~
~ .. ,.w !/ ~ 0: Z ~ ~ !!i ~ tt: ~ ~ <w 8 !5 ~ ~
;;: I .tt: 5 l- S 2 c l- e .'" S S e
...
)6 ~1t'
If{
ATTAr.HMFNT TWO
FILENAME: CY882SUM
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
RATE TABLE EFFECTIVE 7-1-92
RESIDENTIAL & RECYCLING CONTRACTS SUMMARY
7-11-12
I
RATE AT
/630....92
1$10.151
$T:1Ol
$11.251
SINGLE FAMILY UNIT WASTE RATE
SNGLE FAMILY RECYCLE RATE
TOTAL SINGLE FAMILY RESI RATE
EXISTING
RATE AT
6--30-92
MULTI UNIT WASTE RATE
$7.471
$T:1Ol
$8.571
UL TI UNIT RECYCLE RATE
TOTAL MULTI UNIT RESI RATE
.
IRATE I
MODIFICATION
$OA2l
$Q.OO]
$0.421
RATE
MODIFICATION
$0.281
$0.001
$0.281
20
.. RATE AT .
7-1 . 92 .
~10.571
I roO]
( ;1~.:0
PROPOSE
RATE AT
. 7-1-92
I . $7.751
I $1.10 I
I . .$8.851
/6~L//
ATTACHMENT TWO
-- -- --
INCR
4.1%
0.0%
3.7%
%
INCR
3.7%
3.3%
M
-
w
Cl
<C
n.
N
Ol
I
...
;:~(/)
!!1 W>~
>-<
<I-e:
..JU..J
::lW<
:I:t:::C3
we:
o~~
~1ll::E
_;:0
UWU
I-
<
e:
Si
'"
:E
o
g
"
~
il:
I i I
,:11
l!:! !;;: 1lI
1t ~ l!:! I
!l1 1t ~ 0!-
Il ; !
~ ;:! ~
WI!!
i ! i
111
~ ~ ~
I!!
!
~ i I
~ ~ ~
g ;! III
~ ~ ~
~~
~ ~ 6
;! g ~
i i
i~
i ;;! I!!
S ~ ;!
i-
I ~
; I ; ~
~ ! :
lI! I!!
i ~ ~ ~
i ~ i ~
N
..
I
..
I
...
i I
~ ~
2 ;
i ~
~ ~ S A 2 2 ~ ~ ~ A ~ ~ I ~
U u : ~ ~ a a ~ ~ a i ~ 0 ~
.. ;; ..
.~ ~ ~ ~
..: ;: ~ N
: .,. " ;;
~ ~
N "
.. ,..
- .
-~~':~il~~~-C")
_l'l~~~;~.;"l
...............1::
! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .
a i i i i i & & & & & & & a
:t ~ ~ a ~
Ii i ! ! !
; ~
.. ..
= i i ~
.. .. .. ..
~ i '"
i j
~ ~ i i . . ~ ~ ~ ~ I I ~ ~
;; ;; I I ! ! a I ! lEE I I
~ ~ ~ ~ S ! ~ E ~ a ~
~ ~ : . .. .. .. .. _ i ~
~ i ;
~ . E ;; ~
II II Ii Ii '"
; ~ ~ = ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
... .... ... .... .... ; u u u
~ 2 ~ E ~ A g A . g ~ g ~ ;;
.. ; u u ~ ~ = J ~ ~ ~ I I ~
i~i;;
St f ~ i ~
~~;~~
tit .. ;; ;; ..
S I
. '"
;; li
H ~
~ ~ i i i . ~ ~ ~ ~ I I ft ft
; ; I I ! ! a a I lEE i i
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i i ~ ~ ~ ;
a ~ I ~ ~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ I I ! ;;
~ ; ! ~ ! ! ! ~ ti i I fi ! a
ga~gl~.I~II~AN
Ii Ii ;; ;; ;; U ~ U = ~ ~ I ~ i
~ ~ ~ ~ g ~ g R ;: : ~
~ m g.." ~ ~ ; ; . ~ ~ ~
.... ~ - - ; ~ ~ .. ~
... .., ..
It) ,.. .....
,,; ~ ::
~-~, ::
~ ~ m m I I I I S S ~ ~ ;; ;;
........C\lC\lC? C"?..,. U')1l) CQ 1,0,....,....
--........-..........--........-..............
i i i i i i i i i i i i i i
~ 2 S S ~ ~ S 2 222 2 2 2
~ ~ j j ~ j j j j j j J J J
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 S 2 2 S 2 S 2
2 ~ ~ ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ s s s ~ S S 2 2 S S 2 S 2
;2.1
= ~ ; : ; ! ~ S ! 5 ~ ! q ~
.. .. ;; ;; .. ;; ; i B
.~~~~~~
g l:i gi 1.i ~ ..:
.. ; ;; ~ .. ~
an .,..; :;.;.
,... .. Iq
~ ~ 1i
..--
g ~
g te
~ ~
"'". fC !
i i i
i ~ ~ { ~ ~ ~ ~ a ~ ~ { i
a a ~ & & & & a a a a a a a
; ; ~ ~ = ~ ~ ! ; ! ~ = 5 ~
= _;:; i i Iii # I I ~
i i i i I I i ~ ; ; ; ~ ; ;
- ;; - - - ;; - -
; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ; I 3 ~ ~ I I ~
;; '" '" li ~ S i ! ! ~ ! ! !
~ ~ 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i a a ~ ~
~ : ~ ~ ~ i = ~ ~ = = ~ ~ !
- ;; ;
~ i i g ~ i ; ~ ~ ~ s ~ ~ ~
S ! ~ ! ~ ;; I ft I a i a a i
;; ; ~ ~ g I ~ ~ S ! I I ~ ~
I I a ~ E E ;; ;; ~ ~ . . ;; !
I=I~;
'" '" '"
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I 8 I ~
II ~ 5 i ! ! ! ! ~
~ ! i i Iii i i
i i
I ~ I
~ i i
~ a : ~ ; ~ ~ = = ~ ; ~ : J
~ ; ~ ~ .t;
8 t ~ too t;;
c;;; N
,,; :;.; ;; .. ..
~ 8 2 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ a ! i i ! ! ~ i
m m I I ~ ~ l l ! ! ! ! ! !
..........C\IC\1C')C')..,...,.."."COCO........
C\lC\lC\lC\lC\lC\lC\lC\lC\lC\lC\lC\lNC\I
i ~ i i i i i i i ~ i i i ~
2 ~ 2 ~ 2 ~ 2 2 2 ~ 2 2 2 !
j j j j j ~ ~ j ~ ~ -
I ~ I ~ I ~ I ~ I ~ I ~ I ~
2 2 i ~ 2 2 222 2 i 2 i 2
Jt - 'i~
ATTACHMENT TWO.
..,
W
Cl
e(
a.
C\I
ell
1
-
e(1
I-....CIl
CIlWW
>~!.(
e(1-a:
...J(.)...J
::::lWe(
:I:u.-
u.(.)
Wa:
OWW
...J:E
~lD:E
_~O
(.)W(.)
l-
e(
a:
'"
..
..
2
o
(.l
>
(.l
!!j
"'
; it
.-:1
..j;- -(\r,l
Jt l!! .. .,
~ ~ l!! ~
. Jt ~ ,!.
. ; i
~~i
1II
. lli ~
~ g -
!Ii
I ~ ~
~
~ i :
1II .
!1 r~
8 it ...~
t~
~ ! !
i ~ ~
o ,;
~ i
o
i-;-
~ ~ ~
Iii ~
; i ; ~
i i
~ .~ .~
C:l '"t- N
Z l!! .. ..
:; ~ l!! g
" Jt ~ I
W ..
l:l
I
.,
I
..
i I
i ~
2 I
~.~
Ii. 8.... ~ CD It
=t . i .. ;;l .. i .s
* ;; ;; .. ;;
~IM2!'
II !l fi 3 fj II
., .. '"
Q .... V)
::i g ~
;; ;; ~
.
i s: If
~ a a
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ = ~ g ~ = ~ ~ d ~
~ ~ 0 ~ N.. .... ~ 0 ~ ~
: ~ ; ~ ~ * ~ ~ i = :
/
~ ! i ~ U i If i ~ ~ .
~ a a . t t t ~ Iii
! ! ~ i i m i i i ~ ~ i j I
i i ~ ~ ~ ~ i i ! ! i i i ~
! ~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ! ~ ~ ~ I
; ~ fi fi ! ~ ! I i ~ i i E &
.
!~~ v~~~~.~,,~~
; ; ; ~ u a = = ; ; ~ ~ . I
~ i : ~ ~ ; i ~ ~ ~ : ;
~ ;; lOt ;; ;;
~ ~ ~ ~ R ~
;; ;; .. .. ~ :i
i ! ! i i ! ~ i
ii~I~~
; M
J J ~ :f II) ~ ~ ~
! ! ! ! i i ~ ~
I ~ ~ ~ ;, ~ ~ ~ S I ~ ~ ~ ~
.. ; ;;c ~ .. ~ _ j ! a ~ ! ! :.
! I Iii ; i i I i & ; i i
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 5 ~ ~ !
.. .. .. :; ;;
~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~.~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~.i ~ ~i i ! ~ ..~ ~ ~ ~ .~ i
;; ;; M M ~ * * * ~ _ - - -
~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ! ! ! ! ! ~ t ~
...._C\lC\/MM~'l:;fU')U')COCOr--,...
('I)('I)C?C?C'?C'?C")C')('?(I')C')C')C")(f)
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
~ ~ j ~ j ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j
2 2 222 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 i 222
~ ~
~ c
;; ;;
1"2-
~ ~ ~ ! ! ! I a ! I ~ I 2 9
~ .. ;; ;; _ ;; 5 a I I I I ! i
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ S. m ~
! .5 a ! .-! I .i ~ i .'a ! ~ ~. ~
.M . ; '.;
~ ~ If Ii
i. a i. a
~ ~ ~ i ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~
. t t t ~ I I t I a
; ~ ! a , ~ ! I ~ ! I : 2 ~
_ _ fi 5 ti ! ; : i ~ I ~ ! I
i i i i i ~ ~ ~ I Iii i i
~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ! ~ I ~ ~ ~ & -
~ ~ u II ! ! i a lEi I I a
;
~ ~ N I ~ I M ~ I I ~ ~ I ~
_ _ u u ~ u ~ ~ $ I i ~ ~ I
· ~ ! ~ a . ~ . ~M- M~ 1Il~ m; ~~
i ~ i . i 0 ~ " : ! ~ -
;; ;; ;; ;;
~ ~ j i i i i ~ i ~ i i ! i
i i ; ~ ; ; ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
.;;;;..iill..~=
~ . 2 ~ . I ~ ~ ~ a 8 ~ I 8
; ~ fi 5 ~ ; ! i i i & i I I
; i Iii i ; ; i i i
-
Ie j.! I
~ ~ ~
M M M
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . I ~ ~ S
u u ~ ~ a ~ i I ; ;;
~ ~ ~ ~
.. .. .. ;:
8. ~ 5\ :; !l ~
:~i!a;!i
; ~
g si
.. '"
.. ..
i!ii!~
I I ~ ~ ! ! ~ ~ i i ~ ~ i I
..........C\IC\I C?C?.... 1010<0<0""""
.......................................
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 222
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ j ~ ~
22222 2 2 2 2 2 222 2
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
222 2 2 2 2 2 i 2 2 222
It /1/5
ATTACHMENT TWO
Wi II ~ ~ I ; 0 ~ . I ~ 8 i 1iI I ~ II ~ ~ I t a t Ii . i _ Ii I
~. ~ i ~ ii
II . = li II a I ! ft ~ _ ! II Ii ! i i l!
~. ;; ;; - - ;; ;; ;;
C') ii
~lc}: 1ti ~ S! f6 '" G! ~ .. !il l:! \'l ~ 51 $. 8 fl ;,.;. ~ .~ \ll j:\ !! ~ - ..f!! ~ s. !:;
.. "! ,~ '"Y
W ~ ~J!!.;!. f6 ~ ..; 8 t:i <0 .. .::.! a:> '" ,.: :I ::ui e 8 .. Ie .. :i .~ ... .. ! l!l ..::j i:ll a: N
(!) ~ .. .. i ... '" .., <0 ,:'10 ... .. ... '" '"
3:.....~.!. '" .. .. ~ <0 ti co "l 'n. ~. "t 14 :l '" '" ... .. .. .-a n "11;,- ... .. ...
< .. .. .. .. .. .,: .. .. .. .. :Ito't. i;: .:
;; ;; ;0 - - - ; ; ..,....
a. ,- .. .. .. .. .. ... ..
\~iil ~ ii : w I I Ii; 1 w ;: Ii; p;- I 1 Ii; I I ~ w I ~ i I t Ii a I !
tfj.. ~ ~ Ii I t K K a ~ t a a ~
7<~.......!i
....... ...~
.,_... ....,.....-.
!i< = III ! :Ii ; i ~ II i I I i Il! I i l! I ~ j ft I I ~ Ii i ~ I i
\! .. ~ fi I i 5 ! I ~ i i i j i I ~ ~
;; li Ii - ;; - ;; ;; ;;
i ii;
t
I ~... ~ ~ ~ ~ II III I I i I i i I I ~ ~ I I I I ~ ~ i i I III i i
i I I I ! B ~
;; ;; ;; - ;; ;; Ii Ii Ol
i
~ i ! ~ :Ii ~ J:: 8 l! 1iI I 8 _ Ii ~ I Ii 8 _ ~ i 1\ ~ Ii a ~ ~ ~ :Ii ; l!
~ i
! a I Ii Ii i I II II I ~ ~ ! Ol i i S i I ~ ~ ~ ~
ill ;; ;; - ;; ;; ;; - -
... ~
N
Cll
I li~
... I 8 Ii ~ = ~ II II il II ~ il I! II ~ q ~ II l; II I ~ II ~ l! 2 II
I !1 ;; Ii Ii Ii ~ ~ I Ii . Ii II . . ;; iii II Ii ~ II II II . . 0 0 N
< ;; ;; ;;
I- ,.. en ~ a:~
en w w ~
s: > ~ ~ T] ~ ~ III II 5 ~ ~ ~ ! a ~ l! I ~ ~ l! I ~ 5 _ t ! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
j::: ~
< a: ! 6 :i :i I II II II Ii Ii I - ~ li Ii !l I
-' t) i ;; ;; ;; - ;; - ;; ;; ;; ;;
-' i ...~
;j w < .
u. 0 o ~
U.
w a:
w w i _ ! l! Il! ~ i i i I III f III ; :Ii I I i i i Ii i Ie ~ S III ~ 0 2
0 -' :E ~ ~ I .. .. i p i .. ;;; i i I i ~ i III
>- III :E 0 - li Ii i Ol ii i ;; Ii .,
;; ;;
I- < 0 i -----
t) l- t) t ;! ~ i ~ a III III ~ ~ I I i i III I III II :Ii I i i ~ ~ i i III III i ~
w ~ ~ I III ! Il I I ft ft i E E III .. .. ~ ~ i
I- .~ " ;; ;; - ;; ;; ;; Ii Ii Ol Ol
<
a: i
II! ~ III ~ ~ ~ I ~ . l\ l\ II II ~ il ~ ~ ~ II II ~ I ; ~ I. I III Ie ~ ~
.
~ _ II II I ! ~ Ii i Ie i i ! ~ I i !l ii S I I ~ ~ :;
~ ;; Ol
ll! - ;; ;; ;; - ;; ;; ;;
..... ~
~ II III 8 I 1iI i I i :Ii t Ii ! Ii ~ I; ;;; ti ! :Ii ; t i :Ii ;;; ~ ! q ! ;
~ J ! ! i I _ ~ ! ~ ~ i i ~ ~ ~ ~ S.
~ , i l;. 5 i E ~
fi ;; ;; ;; ;; - ;; ;; ;;
, - - - - - -
-
i<]il f! l! :Ii il f! g ~ ~ :i l; ~ ~ II Q Ii III Ii III i ~ ~ Ii I Ii i I _ f!
~
II ~ Ii :i II . ~ _ _ m II Ii ~ . Ii !! - ~ li II ~
.~~ii ;; - ;; . ;; ;; ;; - ;; - ;; ;; .
..... ..~
" ~ s: ... 1Il l)j " <0 :il g ~ 1;;; $. i ~ ~ ~ ..~ .. - ... " ~ .. i F.l Eil !ll rq - i
z l!! .. .. " "! .. "! " '" -
" 1 .. ~ .. .,; <0 .; ..; '" ~ ~ ,.: ... ~ ~ .. - ~ .. ~ .,. :N .u) ~. ...~ is ~. ~. ..
f/) ~l!! g " '" ... i N i " l!!. .. ! ., :g I:: .. ~. '"
'" .. " :g ti '". '" ~ :"'t.. ., '" .. n ~
~ 3:.....~ J; .. .. :.... .. ;; ;0 ;0 ~ - ;0 .. .. .. lI!'t. .. :; - - ;; - ;.
"W .. .. .. .. ..
; ~ II II ~ ~ ! ! I I E E i i III , ~ ~ ! ! ! ! N N i i I I ! !
. ;; ;;
. ~
f)~ - - '" '" '" '" . . lD lD CD CD .... .... - - '" '" '" '" . . lD lD CD CD .... ....
...~ii lD lD lD lD lD lD lD lD lD lD lD lD lD lD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD CD
s: )i............... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
<0
'" a:
0 ..~.......~.
0 :E '" :E :E :E :E :E :E '" :E '" '" '" '" :E :E :E '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" :E '"
> III :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :>
0 :> :> :> :> :> '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '"
, '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" ~ '" ~ '" ~
~ .. ..i) z ~ z ~ z ~ z ~ z ~ z ~ z ~ z ~ z ~ z ~ z ~ z z z
< !i !i !i !i !i !i !i
;;: , !i '" !i '" !i '" !i '" !i '" !i '" !i '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '"
...
/6'-'11
2>
.IlTT.Ilr.HMENT TWO
. .Ji ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ ~ ~
'~i li li i i i i i i i li i ;; ;;
:: =
- -
i~iCi ~ ~ 0 ~ E " I!: ~ Ii [TI l; ~ ~
~ .. ~
II Ii Ii N II 0 1 ! N II II
~ii~~ ;; ;; ;; ;; ;;
E' ""i
~i;~ ii I I " g ~ ~ I
i i i a a i a i i
!Ji~~
'ii!!
!\~ - - "71
" e I m ~ " e ~ ; ! @ i
Ii i . :i :i Ii Ii ;& i Ii .
;; ;;
~
~ - - -. I"
~ ;i m m m a a a m Ii Ii = ~ "
:~ :i :i :i :i ::l ::l . . Ii Ii
~ ;; ;;
or
i
~ -
~ I ~ ~ : m $ ~ s ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~
. li i i ;; li i ::l ::l i ;;
.. M
Ili
~
! i e e e e e e e e a :;~ ~ 0 M
!l1 i i i i i i i i i i li ii ii
N 8 ~ Ili
~ ~
Ol ~ -. !
I 0 ~ ~ . . E E . . : : E ~ ~ ~
~ ~ i i i i i i i Ii Ii ;; ;;
I ~ " .
<C Ol ~ ~
... (J) or .
W W N
> ... s'"i '--
i= <C " ! ~ . ~ " e r;;'"i ! @ ~
<C () a: or ~ Ii i . :i :i Ii Ii i Ii ~ ~ Ii ~ !l
...J W ...J ~ ;; M
;:) u. <C 0 or
:I: u. i= ~
() w z - - ~ ""i
~ ;i M ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ M M ~ ~ ~
u. W W ~ ~ a :i :i :i :i :i :i a a N ::l II ::;
0 ...J Q ~ ;; ;;
D:l 8 or
>- <C (J)
!:: ... w ~ - - - -
a:
() w I g E ~ ~ ~ " E . ~ m ~ ~ s ~ "
... e; i i ;; i i i i i i :i i ;; II
<C ~
a: ~
I I $ ~ ~ a ! .. $ ~ ~ ~ E ~ ..
~ ~ M ~ ~
i 0 ~ .. ::; a ::; 0 li ! II :i
~ , ;; M ;; ;; M ;; M
,
Z ~ it:.;
" Hz-
.. '=l- ::;
.'\i ....~ ii a z ~ e e ~ a: ~ ~ ~ R
0 i i i i .w li i i i i
e~N .F 'Il-
.~ '" :,"-
0 :W
0 '0 Ii -;:
.'~ ........ ~ ~ ~ ~ ...J ~ ~ 5 ~ @ :> ;; I: ~ ~ ; I
~ .. Ii Ii N .a: Ii i
.i~! ;; M i.;,J li li li li ;&
i <{ ::W M
, . a: ..W ';:E
"'i!"-
..... ...~
itli - - ..< i~
.a;
~ $ :,.'w .0 ]5
i W ....~ If ','tIJ
...J ::Q.; ~
a ,:W .0 .;:)
... .:> . 2 '0
(!l
en '..i~ is <{ p .'.i~
... ~ .z '.0:> 0 "0 !1
Z all c-;.. ~ i:: II' z !
w iCll CIl ~ ~ .<
..;;J ~ i r 0
.~ .~ w .:::1 ';:;.j i
N -,:W 0 a: ~ ~ ~ i a: ~ l!l '''' 8 ~
$ .< or <{ '" !l1 w I I .I5 i
~ r z
.'j:: "" ~ w .. -'0..; € I ."~. ;/ ~
., 'z !l >a: or ~ !!s a:: '..a:: 0 i
ll! .. ..a: .w
N W I ~ w ~ .. ~ .. II w ~ ....~ ~ ..
> .. 0 ~ :...J ; ~ ~ ,:;,.,J "0 Ii * *
" I ~ :-,-
.u; !J ':a: F w :a: .z ~ ~ I
~ :;! :'w !1 i a:: ~ ~ s :; a: ~ ~ ::'w S p ~ ~
I 12 c Ii 0 !!s
Ii: ... .a: .. ... s 0 ... 0 ..(J) .. 0
1<..1 IITTII/"'lIUr-U"'" ...""..........
jb-tj!!
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
RATE TABLE EFFECTIVE 9-1-92
RESIDENTIAL & RECYCLING CONTRACTS SUMMARY
7-1a-.
SINGLE FAMILY UNIT WASTE RATE
SNGLE FAMILY RECYCLE RATE
TOTAL SINGLE FAMILY RESI RATE
MULTI UNITS
MULTI UNIT WASTE RATE
MULTI UNIT RECYCLE RATE
OTAL MULTI UNIT RESI RATE
.
PROPOSE
RATE AT
7 1-92
r--$10.57 1
$1.101
r--$11.67I
$7.75]
$1.10 I
$8.851
RATE
. MODIFICATION
$OJ4]
$0.001
$OJ4]
RATE
MODIFICATION
$OJ4]
$0.001
$0.741
:2.~
PROPOSE
RATE AT
91 92.
~11.311
I . $1:101
~12.47j)
I $8.491
I .. $1.101
I $9.591
%
INCR
7.0%
0.0%
6.3%
INCR.
0.0%
8.4%
)6-t/~
ATTACHMENT THREE
C?
-
W
Cl
<
l1.
N
'"
I
...
<I
I-"'CI)
Cl)WW
->1-
>-<
<I-a:
...JO...J
::lW<
:J:1I.-
011.0
Wa:
WW
...J~
>lll~
1-<0
01-0
W
I-
<
a:
Sl
..
::E
o
g
"
~
ii:
Ii I
. .... 'N
l!! < ..
~ ~ l!! ~
!J! ~ .j!t .l.
~ ~
1.:2:<..,
~.. ~ ~
~ ~ i
!l1
!~ i
if
~ I ~
~
!1 ! ~
~ i ~
II.
S It! ~
~ ~ .~
'"
g i
L~
~ ~ i
i
i m
I!# ~. ~
~ ~ 7
~ '" ~
~ i ~
.~ ~
o
~,'~',,~ Sl
2 ~ l!! ~
Ii! ~ j!t .!.
...
Sl
I
~
I
~
; ~
.. i
~ ~
2 !
...-->
~ ~
I .
~ ~ a a q q
Ii Ii li li a li
~ = 5
.. :; :;
I'! I I Q Q
~!!BB
~ g ~ ~ ~ :: .-'~ ~ ~ ~ :; C; ~ -x
; ~ g ~ ~ g ~ ~ ! re X g c 8
- - ; .M ; ; _ _ _ w ~ ~ a ~
~ ~ ~ l ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l ~ i
a i i i i i a a a a a a a i
~ A ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
s i ! i B ; ; ~ I ! ~ m I B
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ . . ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ! ! ! ! i i i i i a ~ ;
~ a I'!
_ II li
=~1~~8111
;~~!l!l5li!
~ ~ ;
- - -
~ ~ e e ~ ~ & & ~ ~ 5
i i i i is:; :; :; :; ..
5 ~ ~
- - -
a a II! II! I a
li li Ii Ii II Ii
~~~~llll~~
--.:~~~~
:; ;; .. .. :; ;it M: ..
" ~
~ ~
01 _
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~
! i ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 I ~
:; :; ;; ;; ;; ;;
~ - ~
i j i
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ & ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
; ; 5 5 a a i i ! ! ~ ~ j i
a ~ ~ I'!
01 Ii li lli
~ ~ 6 ~ ~ a ! ~ ~ ~
.. .. ; ; ; i 5 ! I a
i~~~3
'" ;; :;
i ; i I Ii;
! ~
~ I
:; :;
~ q ~ a II! S ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ! a ~
i i i i i i ; :; :; :; .. .. :; U
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ $ ~ ~ ~ ~
i ~ ~ ~ l ~ ~ m I I m ~ ~ i
= = R R a a ~ ~ I I II! II! 5 5
.........C\IC\1C'?C')..,.vU')U')COCO.....,...,
...................................................................
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ 2 2 222 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ J J J J ~ J J J J
2 2 2 222 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Z ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ z ~
22222 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 i 2
~ ~ ~
;
~ I I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Q Q
~ ~ ~ j j i i i ill
; ; ! ~ ~ ; ~..~ ; ~ ~..~ ~ ; ~ ~..~
...;.,..... _~ :l..i
~ i ~ i R W ~ ~ i W ~ i ~
i i ~ a ~ a ~ a i i i l a a
~ ~ ~ IIi I I ! ! i~ ll~ .~ = 5 ~
!1~.!li! -=:!~
I ~ ; ; ~ ~ i i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
a _ . iii . ;; ;; ;; .. .. ;; I I
= ~ ~ I i I Ii; I j Iii
ee&&I\I\&&
a a ;; .. ; ;; U U
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ II!l ~ ~
all,
- -
~ ~ . . a a ~ ~ , ,
; ; 5 5 5 5 a a i i
~ ~ ~ i I I 8 ~ · ! !l~ I j- 8
~!;;lIllg~illl ~
;;;;Iilui .
i i ~ ~ ~ ~ ; ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
.......;;;;
II! II I 8 ~ I i I II , 8 I i ~
Ii ~ ; ~ i ~ li i a ! ! ! ! a
~ ;
- -
; Iii I i I i I I i I
i ~
~ ~ !
;; .. -
2 ~ ~ ~ >> ~
: ~ a
"'" ... N (\I
"': f'i ~ ~
~ a ~ !:l
.. :.," - .,.
to l8 l8
. ~ l
'" .. '"
tIj "j ~
~ i a
~ rr;, $! ~
! !i Iii ~
... '. ~ :;
K R ~ ~ II! II! ~ ~ ! ! ! ! ! !
..........NNC')C')...'lItW)U')CDCD,.........
NNNNC\lNNNNNNNC\lN
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~.
~ ~ 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 222
~ j j ~ ~ ~ j ~ J j j ~ ~ j
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 S 2 S
Z ~ Z ~ Z ~ ~ ~ z ~ z ~ ! ~
222 2 2 2 2 2 i 2 i S 2 2
/6-tf7
;l..~_
ATTACHMENT THREE
i ~ : ti ti ; ~ ~ ~ G G II I j j ~ a G ~ i ~ i i i ~ i i j j
~ .~ II G ~ 5 a a i i ! j j Ii !
I li - - -
M ..
-
l!! .~. N i .. .. 2 ~ ~ '" 1il ~ .lll .. '" lO Ii! 0 ; 8! ~ i 2 S N = .. ~ l< l:i ~
.. '" '" ~ Of "" ~ ~ .. . '"
w ~ 12j!! I ~ ~ .; a J ~ .. ~ i '" i l ..~ * :.a & ~ &l ~ i ~ ~ .. l .~ N N i
Cl ~ &l :z ~ ~ .. i! ~
~ l'l l:l ~ ~
e( ~ .~ 6. .. .. .. .. .. ;0 ~ .. ; ~ ~ ~
n. '.... .. .. ..
. <JiF iil f Ii; If I@; !: I Jr .. I f Ii ~ I ~ ~ ;: f ~ It or f f f f I 0;- f "
~ ....~/ a ~ ;; ;; a Ii i ~ ~ i ;; ;; ;; Ii i ~ ~ ~ i i t ~
s>~<i
I i ~ ; g R I ~ II i II I II i ~ . ; I ! ; ; R II ! ~ i . II ~ I
. 11 ! a i i ! l! i ~ i i ! ! i
~ li li - Ii - li Ii i 1
!l! ..
! ';j II II .. 5 ~ ~ ~ I I 1'1 ~ i l! ~ ~ ~ ~ i i Ii Ii ; ; ~ ..
~ i i i i
! ~ ! ! i . ~ . i i ti i fi fi ~
li li li li li .li - - "
l!!
if
~ I.......~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ . ti II ; i i I . ~ . l! ~ Ii I I li I ~ Ii il = ~
j i ~
Ii Ii .. i! Ii 5 li ! i E I i
- li " - li
-
N "-','>-'"
ell
I . . I
... i ~ ~ ~ li N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ II II N N ~ ~ ~ ~ a 1!I ~ ~ !! ~ 8 8 8 ~
I ! Ii Ii Ii li Ii II II II :i :i /I " II Ii li II :i " " II I I ~ :;;
e( - -
(/) 11 ..
I- ell ..
(/) w il ~ ~
w
> > ~ S n . . II II II II R R S ~ ~ i ~ ~ . . ~ ~ l; i I I ~ ~ I .
i= ~ ~ ~ j
e( a: II II ~ ~ 5 5 li li ~ ~ II i Ii li li ! Ii Ii I I II
..J e i :f# - - - -
..J t~
~ w e(
J: LJ.. (3 ,
e LJ..
w a:
w w r~ ~ ~ ~ R I ~ II i ~ , II N II . , I i I ; R II . ~ i . II ! i
..J ~ g II ~ . 11 ! l! ~ l! I i ! ! l! . ~ i ~ ! i i !
> III ~ 0 li li - Ii II ~ " - li Ii i
l- e( 0 ~ ----,-
e l- e !l! i.J Ii Ii 1'1 1'1 ~ ~ ~ I II II i i ~ i ~ ~ ~ i I I II ~ I I N 5 i i
w i !l !l ~ 5 ~ ~ II . . ~ i! i! g ! II ~ .
I- M li li - li li li li - - li Ii Ii ii ii
e(
a: i -------
1H ~ I G . II G ~ ~ I S S ~ ~ N il ~ G I: II II ~ S ~ . ~ i II I i
. ~ ~
i ~ N ~ Ii ~ !l i 1 i! ~ ~ i I: S . 1I Ii II !l ! li Ii I ~ i I
li - II II - li - li
II ; ~ 8 ~ I I i i , I ~ 8 B i I i ~ ~ I i ~ 0 i l! 8 .. ~ ~
li ~ . ~ & il ! i! i 5 I i ! ! i ~ i a ~.
i ,
'; li li II
~ li li - -
i iil ~ ~ ~ I: l!! E l! ~ ~ II ~ ~ ~ ; ~ ~ ~ N ~ ~ l! E R . III ~ ~ .
.~.g N li - li II li li :i II II " Ii li - II II i :i :i ~ " II I Ii
i
...\!!
0 S :!! N . " '" :II '" '" ~ '" 18 ~ Je : ~ . .. .. '" .. '" ~ ~ ~ ~ 8! ~
~ ".'.~ !c ill '" .. '" Cl .. .. '" '" . '" Cl f'oo: ~ ..
.; .; .. .. .. '" Iii .; '" .; .. .; .; .; ,.: ~ .. .. .. .. '" .. ~ i .. '" ~ (II
~l!1~ I '" ~ .. :i .. .. :8 N '" .. ! .. '" g '" .. c ~ :8 ..~ ~ ! .. ~ l'4
~ ;; :;j .., ~ :i :i .. ., .. N l:l ~ t; ;q,
I .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .~ .:... ~; .. ; ~ ;0 ;0
Ii! ~<< .. ..
...
<~ II ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ II II E E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I I I I N W il i
li~ li li
J~ ~ ~ N N '" '" .... .... on on '" '" .... .... ~ ~ N N '" '" .... .... on on '" '" .... ....
.sFi '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ....
N ~:;~! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
.. ~ ~ ~ ~ I!! ~ ~ ~ ~
'"
:0 a: ~ a:
0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 :0 '"' '"' '"' '"'
g '"' '"' :0 '"' '" '"' '" '" '" :0
lli '" :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :>
:> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> '"' '" '"
<J I '" '" '" '" '" '"' '" '" '"' :0 '" '" '" '"' '" '" '" '"
,....ir' '" '" :0 '" :0 '" '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~ ~ :z ~ :z ~ :z ~ :z ~ :z ~ :z ~ :z ~ :z ~ :z :z :z :z :z :z
u: I ;; '" ;; '" ;; '" ;; '" ;; :0 ;; '" ;; '" ;; '" ;; '" i '" li :0 i '" i :0 li :0
..
/ b -,-/y
~(
ATTACHMENT T~REE
I I:: I:: ~ ~ D D ~ ~ Z Z ~ ~ 8 ~ I ~ I:: i z I D ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
! ~ . 5
~ D ~ ii ii ~ J J E E i i ~ = i I i i a !
I ;; - ;'l ;'l ;; - -
- ;; - - ;;
<? ..
.... III 15l '" .. ~. 0 .. :: N ~ &j I; ~ ll! R N .. .. '" ... ... i:: III i'l ; s iii ~ ~
w It.J!! '"' .... '" "! "! "! .. :C". on - .. .., ..
~.......~.....~ I .. ~ . .... .. .. .. .. . g ~ ::! .n .~ .. ..::i ~ .. 0 sj 0; .~. .~ N .. .. ~ ::\
C) ~ .. .... N .. i j .. .., ~ - - i .. .., .. ..
cl. ~ .., .:; '" 1i .. ~ '" "1- ~ .~ l:l .li. Ii ..~ ..... V)~ .... ,. o.
<I: .. .. .. ..
;; ;; - ;; :; .;; - ~ ; ;;: N
a. .. .. .. .. !': ". .. ..
<;....Q ~ -R { ~ ~ i i; i ~ ~ i IJ Ii { i; Ii .- ~ w ~ I & i i: i; a I !
shiu a a I ~ a & I ~ I a t I a ~ I I & ~ I Ii .
S /~ a
..... .J1.
~<i ~ R III ~ i i ! R l! I i ~ ~ I ~ I! i i i i z i I I i I II ~
.. .. ~ B ~ I 2 i I i I i ~ ~
~ 0 ;; fi i - -
-T0 ;; ;; ;;
~
~ I I 1II 1II a i i ;; I I I I I I ~ ~ ~ II ~ ~ I i I I Z z i i
i .
fI i ~ i j Ii I I ! I I a I i i I ! i i
.
;; - ;; .
i
..~ I)! II III I ~ ~ ~ Ii I .. ~ ~ III I II ~ I i I II II I fi ~ 11 ! I ~
i .
fi 5 i ! i ! !l ~ I III = ~ a 5 ! i I i ! . ~
;; ;; ;; - ;; - - ;; ;; ;;
1< ~"'","
N
ell
I I
.... ~ Ii Ii 0; ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ Ii Ii I ~ i1 i1 ~ Ii ~ ~ II II ! ! I I 1II 1II II II
I i ;; ;; Ii Ii Ii Ii lIi li Ii; Ii li li ;; I ;'l lIi II ~ Ii; a a 0 0
<I: - - ;; ;;
I- ell l/l a ~
l/l W W ~
:> > ~ ~ .. ~ ~ ~ I I I ~ I I l! ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ II ~ ; 1II 'i i ~ ~ N N S ~
i= Il! . t t .
<I: a: . . & & " ~ i !l ! ! " 0 ~ i i II I I I ~
~ ~ ;; ;; ;'l ;'l II ;; ;; N
-' U -' ~ ~ - ;; ;; ;; ;; ;; ..
::J W <I:
::t u.. . ~
u.. 13
w a:
w w ft!! ~ m III ~ i g ! m l! I I ~ ~ I 8 I! i i ~ i z i III ~ i ~ i ~
-' :IE I .. ~ B I .. I ~ . i I i ~ I i i ! I ~ ~
fi i i ~ =
)0- al :IE o ~ ;; Ii; - - ;; ;; ;;
~ ;: 0 ~
u u ~ ;j ~ ~ ~ 8 ~ D ~ ~ II II ! ! ~ ~ I I ; I i i Ii Ii i i ~ ~ ~ ~
D
W ~ ~ I ! ~ I I ! ! a a ! ! E 11 II .. - i ~ i i
I- ~ ;; ;; ;; ;; - ;; ;; ii Ii ;'l
<I:
a: i
~ Ii I D I:: 8 ~ ~ I 8 .. ~ ~ I Ii; 8 .. ; ~ Il l; ~ 1II ~ ~ ~ ~ = 11
~ . . .. .
< ~ .. i ?i II a i i I I il I I l! ~ ?i ~ ! i i Iii i I ~ ~ !
.. - ;; - ;; - ;; ;; -
..... ~
15 ~: 8 ! II i I ~ I l! 1II ~ 8 ~ OJ " I! i i ; ! I ~ 11 i ~ I; I ~ ~
:c .,-Sf G . i i ~ ~- ~ ! .. ~ j i i ~ ~ l
j!! ~ i E
~ ~ - ;; - - ;; - ;; ;; - ;; ;; - ;;
I ~ ~ 5 ~ ~ ~ i1 ~ 1II ~ v ~ ~ Ii ; ~ e ~ a = ~ ~ I 1II ~ a ~ ~ I
~ ;; II Ii Ii II ;'l ;'l li lIi li Ii li ;; Ii I ;'l II Ii a Ii a 0
u - ;;
!i
~
c .. ~ ~ .., '" lil .~ ~ 111 a ~ Sl ~ II! ..~ ; - ~ .. .. .., ~ !<l ~ 1': t:! 8! ~
~ J!!. !;( ;'N .. "l '" .~ " i ..,
~ :;i .~ ..; * +-.: i$ 0 ~ ~ S'l t:i ..; .; .. ! .. ~ m ::l J:! g ~ a 1:1 :!i i ~
glllr~ I .. fi ! ~ ~ Zi. !
,..... ~ .. .. 1i Ji - '" .... ~ o. '" ~
lj!lt. , .. .. .. ;; ;; ;; ; .. ; .; - ~ - .'1"": ~,
'" .. .. .. ..
...
i)~ I II ! ! ! ! I I I I I i II , 11 11 ~ ~ i! i! N N i I , , ! !
. ~ 0;
>i
j......~ ~ ~ '" '" '" '" .... .... il) il) co co .. .. ~ ~ '" '" '" '" .... .... il) il) co co .. ..
liii il) il) il) il) il) il) il) il) il) il) il) il) il) il) co co co co co co co co co co co co co co
;.1\
III }/. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ i ~ ~ i ~ i ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ i ~ ~ i i ~
..
,. ~'~
0
<.l III ,. ,. ,. ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I
> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :>
:> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :> :>
<.l I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ,. ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ::I ,.
~ ~ i0iG z !! z !! z !! z !! z !! z !! z !! z !! z !! z !! z !! z !! z !! z !!
..: I :i ,. :i ::I :i ::I :i ::Ii :i ::I :i ::Ii :i ::Ii :i ::I :i ::I :i ::I :i ::Ii :i ::Ii :i ,. :i ::Ii
....
;J.<!
)0 -Jjc;
ATT~CHMENT THREE
.
.
.
Attachment 4
Comparison Rate Survey Data
Summary and Definitions
Attachment 4-A
Monthlv Refuse and Recvclinl! Rates of Incorporated Cities -
Database of rate information for both residential and commercial
refuse, as well as residential recycling, rates for 17 cities in San
Diego County including Chula Vista.
Attachment 4-B
Rate Comoarisons for Chula Vista and 5 Cities with Similar
Service - Only 5 of the 16 other incorporated cities have service or
contract requirements similar to Chula Vista. Specific criteria
applied include: single contractor; rate includes franchise fee as %
of receipts; and contractor incurs all costs associated with billing
customers and collecting bad debts. (Note: All 16 cities reported
receiving some free community services from contractor, so this
item was not used as an element of comparison.)
Rates have been broken into components for comparison purposes
and adjusted to factor out the franchise fee except for the
residential recycling rate comparison. Net recycling rates charged
to the customer are complex calculations of numerous factors and
available information does not allow for an accurate adjustment for
the franchise fee component.
NOTE:
Comparison rates do not reflect landfIll fee increases
(eff. 9-1-92) for any City.
Attachment 4-C
Rate Comoarisons for All Cities with Sinl!le Contractors and
Franchise Fees - These .rate comparisons are based only on the
criteria that a single contractor is the service provider and a
franchise fee is paid to the City and therefore charged in the rate.
As in Attachment 4-B, rates have been broken into components and
adjusted to factor out the franchise fee, except for the residential
recycling rates.
NOTE:
Comparison rates do not reflect landfIll fee
increases for any City.
WPC exbA
Jb~tJ
~q
ATTACHMENT FOUR
c ..
, 0
~ .....
..
.. ..... DC
, -..
...- ~-
0'" =-8
".8 ...
.. II
.. .. n
.. il:l !
c ...
... ..: l!
~..
-~ ~o -
0.. .. -- ~
..... '" ...- ..- !
- ..... .
.... 0 .. "..
0.. .. :a.. .... ..
.. .~ ..- .!: .
. 0 .. ..... . ..
.... .. ..- .. .11 - - !
.... .... ~ .. .c
..- 0 .... . I~ .. ~
o:a .. .... ... ..
.. .... .. .. l!
..... .. ... .. ..
. .. 0 .. ... -
~- . . ~ ..,. 0
-.c + -.. 0- .. 1 -
.. .... .... -
, ~ N N N ~" . " 1 -
. ... ... ... -. . .. .- I
V .. ~ ~ 0 .. 0 .... - -
... ..- 0 .. 0.. - fI
.. .... .. .. ... i
..~ !:. .. .. .. . .. . .. -
!' .. .. ..- . .. .0 . .
. -- a. ~ ~ - .. .. .... .. c
'" .. . . . ,;:::. .. c .. .. ~ -
.. .." ... ... ... ~ 0 ~o l!
I ..-.. .. .. .. -;;1!.~ ON .. o ..,., - I
.. ~.... ..... .. ... ...
..... 0 0 0 ...0 .. - 0.. .. ..
.. . ...... ~ ~ ~ .-.. "'... - N"'_' .. . I
-
~
- .
U - ..
.. ..
III .. - 0 0
- .. . . ....
.. .. .. .. ...
c t ... i .. .. ..
.. .. !:!,
~ .. .. .. . .
.. '" ~
.. '> on ... ... u_
~ . . + 0 + 0 .. ....
- .. ,., - u..
... .. 0 .. .. .. .. N .. .. .. .. 0" .. 0 0" .. .:. = = .. ..
lO- II . on ,., 0 0 - .. '" N 0 0 on 0 on .. ..
-N - - - . 0.. 0.. ..
..... . 0 .
0.. .. .. - N.. _N
.. ,., .. .... ....
ii 0: ,;
. 0
:=1 - ,., N ..
.. on .. on on .. - on Ie on '" . 0 '" on I ... ~ " .
.. ~ - ... ... on .. ... .. ... ,., ,., .. ": "! . .
-.. I ,.: '" - . . . 0 ..
~i - 0 N .. ,., 0 ... on N 0 .. 0 on Ie 0 ... - i - ..
'" ... on '" on on on '" '" '" . '" .. '" ~ ~ .. .
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 0 .. , . .. ..
U:o U 0 0 ~ -
ll!- il- ,., - ..
.. .. .. .- .
.. .. ... "
.. :'l! ...
.. ..
. . . ". ..
!: - . . . . . . . 0 0 . -
.. ... ... .. 0 '" ~ 0 0 0 ... '" '" .. ... '" '" ~ - .. -
.. ! N ... .. N .. ,., ,., - - on ~ N N ~ .. .
.. . . on ,., . . . N .. -
. 0 0 N 0 N 0 - N - 0 ,., ;;; 0 - - N - - .. ~ ..
.. ;;; ;;; - ;;; - - - - - - - .. - - - - - 0_ ..
. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. , .. . .. .. .. .. .. t I
... .. 0 on
'" . ": ... .. ..
.. 0- . :a
! - o. u
- ..
a .. l'
.
.. 1
0
.. ..
f - - ~
. . :a
.. . . ~ . g .
g 8. 8. .. - i
j ... c -
U . , . - .. .. .
- ... . j .
.. 0 0 .. ... .. ..
!l . .. ... c ..
Ii .g .. a .. I I I .
... ~ ... .. ~ . . .
.. .. .. i :a :a .. . .. .. - - - .
. .. j . . . j .. .. ... ... ... ..
.. .. ~ ~ :;; .. . .. . - - - ..
~ . 0 . ... 0 ... 0 0 0 . ... ,. . .. . . . .
- . u . C . u u u u .. . c . . ... ... ... ..
. 0 ... 0 . . . ... ... ... ~ . . 0 ;:
U ... U :0 .. ... ... ... ... ... ... .. ::> U ..
- - ~
- ~ ~ -
.. -
Ii .. u
- - ..
.. ~ ~ u
. .. ..
. . B ..
... , . . -
.. ... - .. ..
. .. . ... . . .
.. .. , .. . OlIO ..
.. , ,. U , . . .. .. .. ..
. 0 . 0 , .. 0 .. . .:!1 .:!1 Ii
... 0 ~ . ... - , .. - . ... u .. -
. ... .. 0 .. :;; . . . .. . . .. > ;1 ;1 ...
... . . '- c , .. ~ , . . .. . ..
. ~ .. . ~ .., .. ~ 0 . ~ ... .. .. ~ . .
~ - 0 U - 0 t: .. i :: , . . .. . .. - ..
.. .. "ii II u , .. :a ~ ~ '0 . " ".. "....... .~
. 0 - . . . . u 0 . . ;: fi fie fie 'J
U U 0 ... ... ... - . ... ... .. . 0 ... .. .. ..
;'0 ATTACHMENT FOUR-I ~
.
.
.
co
.
IIIl:t
-
C
(1)
E
.c
u
ca
-
-
<C
B
.-
~
CD
U)
..
CO
-
.-
E
.-
U)
.c
-
.-
~ ....
c:
U) 0
CD .~
.- f
-
'(3 N
an 1il !!!
..,
" ~ ~
:!1
C ~ II.
co .2 0
III
U) m ct
S III
co W
.. .. ~
co j a:
- ..
U) .!IJ Z
-6 0
:> Iii Q
.1= W
co -g ~
-
:J ~ III
.c ..
(J S
."
.. ~
0 "
- ~
U)
C
0
U)
.-
..
co
E
0
(J
S
co
a:
=
.5
U
~
a:
Jj
-
c
~
11
a:
~
~
~ ~
~
CD
<'!
~
0>
"'":
~
@FtH
~ ~:~i:I;~
,.... .:::::~::,
}~I':
tL......)
n I drl1
...J W III W ...J ...............
:::::::::~~::::::
~~~~~'I:
M {#Ht
>-
i!
o
lK
::J
Gi
a:
Jj
E
CII
E
E
8
~
e
Cl CIl
~
c: 'c
~ '0
CII c:
...J W
~
c
o
lK
::J
Gi
a:
iii
:;::
c:
CII
'tl
11
a:
ilil! <0
hi ci
t~:
iil
ill
::::;:$;:;: ~
;';m ~
Il'll j
",w.,.
ll) "'I"
<'! l~II!1
= ~
.5 ~
... ......:.;.:....
U .:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:
~ ::.::,::::;::.;.;
:::::;:::::::~.:.
a: w....
w
::;:;:;:;:::;:;:;:
011
.,",""
lK .,....
."."
::::;:;:::::~::.:
::J iiii
-
CII
a: i~
iii
:;::
c: II:;
CII
'tl '"
11 CIl ""$1,,
'" II
a: ~
'"
...J
:.;.:.:.;.".;.;
CIl
'" ~
CIl '"
'" ~
~ c:
j ~
ll) '"
ll) ~
ai oi
~ CIl
a c: ~ CIl
c: 2. a:s m
o "", ~ '2
E <..l :il 'g
~ W III W
<0 co co "Id'
<0 II) 0 U')
ci ci 0 ai
~ ~ ~
~ CIl
e ~
Cl c: CIl
'" ~
c: .S!. ~ 'f:
0 '"
E <..l c: "g
'" W '"
...J III W
.....w.
I
5,,1,
81
W'U
CD ll)
co ~
cO cO
31
l5! ~
~ ..
... ...
~
i ~
N ~
... ...
. .
::;: !ll
o 0
.. ..
... ...
~..
'!~rn
.!Ii iii ~ l!! E
If) 'a ':;;;! -~
'" S lii=-~:S~
= .c 'tlC'tlcE~
~ i I~~;.~ ~
.c l' &= !.!~=E li=...
o ca-=a:I~- U
II) 1iiCcl!lPl!'tl~
CD S:=cgOas;=i"E
~ '" ='51 lK ... ::J '" lK
CII 'Sl!!Kl::J~Ei!:'tl
~ 0 ~!!e lKs!ra
i
o
~
)b/5:2-
.
Attachment 4-C
Rate Comparisons for All Cities with Single Contractors and Franchise Fees
(Adjusted to exclude franchise fees exceptio, residential recycling only)
BASED ON RATES AS OF 7/1/92
ReSidential Refuse & Recvclina Commercial Refuse
La Mesa $11.25 Del Mar $68.70
Chula Vista (Proposed) 10.73 Lemon Grove 62.03
Lemon Grove 10.66 National C~y 61.62
Del Mar 10.56 Carlsbad 59.66
EI Cajon 10.56 Vista 58.04
Vista 10.08 Encinitas 57.95
San Marcos 10.06 LaMesa 57.64
National C~y 9.90 San Marcos 57.43
Carlsbad 9.86 EI Cajon 57.03
Encinitas 9.54 Chula Vista (Proposed) 56.37
Escondido 9.28 Escondido 52.31
(Avg. emong 10 other ellie. i. $10.18) (Avg. emong 10 other elti.. i. $59.24)
. Residential Refuse Residential Recvclina
Chura Vista (Proposed) $9.72 La Mesa $1.71
La Mesa 9.61 EI Cajon 1.48
Lemon Grove 9.55 Escondido 1.43
National C~y 9.39 Del Mar 1.29
Del Mar 9.33 Vista 1.26
EI Cajon 9.13 San Marcos 1.26
Vista 8.89 Encinitas 1.19
Carlsbad 8.89 Lemon Grove 1.18
San Marcos 8.86 Chula Vista (Proposed) 1.10
Encinitas 8.45 (Avg. among 8 other clll. i. $1.35)
Escondido 7.98
(Avg. .mong 10 other cill.. I. $9.01)
.
WPC exhA-3
/~,:5';;
32.
.
. JJ'8J1JZ'JJ'86
LAIDLAW WASTE SYSTEMS
.
.
CONflDtNTlAL
June 17, 1992
Mr. Lyman Christopher
Director of Finance
City of ChuJa Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Dear Mr. Christopher:
As you know, at the August 27, 1991 Council Meeting, the City Council requested
"justification" for the price increase implemented last year and to enter into a Confidentiality
Agreement with Laidlaw. City Staff members have indicated that the City Council
specifically requested Laidlaw's Return on Investment (ROI) as a one time request to assure
City Staff that the 1991 rate increase, based on the C.P.I., was reasonable.
As we have discussed at great length, the ROI calculation is not part of or required by the
Franchise Ordinance. In fact, the Franchise Ordinance, as approved in 1985, reflects the
City's desire to eliminate the time consuming, cumbersome, expensive, and exhaustive audit
of Laidlaw's records that was then required and to base future annual April rate increases
on the San Diego C.P.!. It is also not possible to specifically calculate the ROI for only the
franchise operation; the franchise represents only a portion of our operation - costs,
expenses, assets, and capiial relating to the franchise are not separately identified. Further,
it remains unclear as to how or where the ROI calculation can be re.Iated to the annual
change in the Consumer Price Index that is the basis of the annual April rate modification.
Laidlaw does, however, intend to continue to work closely with City Staff in preparing
schedules and information that facilitates your review of last year's rate modification. Based
on your instructions for this one time request, we have calculated an approximate ROI figure
for the commercial and residential franchise. Although there ljre many services provided
for by our Chula Vista Division specific to the franchise, we have estimated ROI
components of costs and assets based on revenue and routes relating to the franchise.
As we have discussed, the requested information would constitute sensitive proprietary and
trade secret information. We discussed with Mr. Boogaard entering a Confidentiality
Stipulation before releasing the requested ROI. Mr. Boogaard has brought to our attention
the decision in San Gabriel Tribune v. Superior Court, 133 CaI. App. 3d 762, 192 CaI. Rptr.
415 (1983) indicating that our disclosure of such information to the City may very well be
subject to disclosure under the California Public Records Act.
Recycled Paper
180 Otay Lakes Road, Suite 200 . Bonita, California 91902 .
/~ :5'/
(619) 267 - 6900
~3
ATTACHMENT FIVE
.
.
.
61/188681
CONflDrNTlAL
LAIDLAW WASTE SYSTEMS INC.
We are able to satisfy the City Council's request of last year for 'Justification" and provide
such information. The estimated ROI for the twelve months ended March 31, 1992 for the
commercial and residential Chula Vista Franchise is 5.8%. We cannot, however, provide
further breakdown or detail of this ratio without a means to insure the confidentiality of that
information as it is proprietary and privileged data not to be of record to the market place.
With respect to the $305,000 settlement last year, it was never agreed or understood on our
part that interest on that sum would be owing to the City. However, at your request, we
have included an assumption that interest is owing. Conversely, there has been a very
substantial delay in obtaining the April 1, 1992 price increase requested. Thus, we would
correspondingly request interest on the lost opportunity between April 1, 1992 and the
effective date for rate increase. (The same would have to be true if the landfill increase is
not timely implemented as that increase cost would be carried by us.)
Assembling the information requested by the City Staff has been a long and laborious task,
perhaps comparing to the "audit" practice in effect for price increases before the 1985
franchise agreement. We trust that the information we have provided you more than
satisfies all of your concerns.
Sincerely,
GJ~~ -
Daniel P. Higgins
Director of Financial Operations
DPH/mey
cc: J. Weaver
D. Blind
C. Hoge (Post, Kirby, Noonan & Sweat)
/6:5'5
3'f
ATTACHMENT FIVE
..
. 8888/188
LAIDLAW WASTE SYSTEMS
CONrmr:NTlAL
May 11, 1992
Mr. Lyman Christopher
Director of Finance
City of Chula VISta
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula VISta, CA 91910
Dear Lyman:
.
Per your request at our meeting on May 5, 1992, a review of the direct operating CoslS incurred
by Laidlaw at our Chula VISta Division has been completed based on annualized coslS incurred
for the nine month period ended March 31, 1992. On an annualized basis direct operating costs
for the total Chula VISta Division increased by 3.5% for that period.
While our direct operating costs have gone up, this increase does not include internal
adjustments that have been made to costs such as Interest Expense and Administrative Salaries
and Costs. Adjustments, for instance, have been made to Administrative Salaries and Costs
reflecting a down sizing of the Chula VISta Region Office and a salary freeze for all Laidlaw
Management.
Sincerely,
GJ9{.-~~
--"
Daniel P. Higgins
Director of Financial OperatiOlIS
cc: J. Weaver
D. Blind
C. Hoge
DPH/mey
.
Recycled Paper
180 Otay Lakes Road, Suite 200 . Bonita, California 91902 . (619) 267 ~ 6900
/6---57
?{
_ATTAt'UMt:'NT 1:1\11:'
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item -L2
Meeting Date 07/28/92
ITEM TITLE:
REPORT
Consideration of Creating a Chula Vista Housing Authority
SUBMITTED BY:
Community Development Director
City Manager.j ~ ~ ~
L.S..
REVIEWED BY:
(4/5ths Vote: Yes _ No...xJ
BACKGROUND: The Council has asked for a report on the desirability of creating a Chula
Vista housing authority under State Law. Currently, affordable housing in Chula Vista is
pursued through a combination of activities by the Community Development Department and the
County housing authority. Council requested an analysis of the benefits of consolidating those
efforts under a local housing authority.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council authorize staff to initiate a process to form a
Chula Vista Housing Authority and return with a schedule of actions.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: The Housing Advisory Committee, at
its meeting of July 22, 1992, recommended that the City Council direct staff to prepare a
detailed analysis related to the formation of a City of Chula Vista Housing Authority. (The
minutes of that meeting are not yet available.)
DISCUSSION:
The analysis of the desirability of creating a housing authority in Chula Vista needs to address
the following issues: purpose of a housing authority, existing housing authority functions,
advantages to having a local housing authority, and disadvantages to having a local housing
authority.
PurDose of A Housinl! Authoritv
State Law provides for jurisdictions to create Housing Authorities and governs the authority,
structure, and operation of Housing Authorities. Housing Authorities are empowered to
develop, finance, and own low-income housing. In addition, many Federa1low-income housing
subsidy programs provide funding solely to Housing Authorities. Housing Authorities are either
Local Housing Authorities created by municipalities or Regional Housing Authorities created by
counties. The choice of having a local housing authority or participating in a regional housing
authority is up to each jurisdiction. In the San Diego region, the County Housing Authority is
a regional housing authority with participation by the unincorporated county and the cities of
Chula Vista, Coronado, Del Mar, EI Cajon, Encinitas, Escondido, Imperial Beach, La Mesa,
Lemon Grove, Poway, San Marcos, Santee, Solana Beach, and Vista. Local Housing
Authorities exist in the City of San Diego, Carlsbad, Oceanside, and National City.
J7~/
Page 2, Item II
Meeting Date 07/28/92
The City of Oceanside has had its own Housing Authority since 1980 and currently administers
about 557 certificates and vouchers, while National City established its authority in 1976 and
is responsible for 1,019 certificates. Staff at both of these cities indicated that the availability
of the city housing authority will help to provide for local discretion in the use of the program
to respond to local housing needs and priorities and will improve the delivery and coordination
of housing programs.
Existin!!: Housine Authority Function
Chula Vista pursues affordable housing functions as a City, a Redevelopment Agency, and a
participant in the regional housing authority. The City addresses affordable housing principally
in the areas of land use planning/regulation, Community Development Block Grant, and some
Federal and State programs. Land use planning/regulation deals with enabling zoning, density
bonuses, mobilehome issues, and the Housing Element of the General Plan. The Community
Development Block Grant Program funds such housing activities as fair housing, tenant-landlord
relations, and grants to non-profit housing corporations. The Department of Housing and Urban
Development (HUD) Rental Rehabilitation Program, HOME funds, HUD Section 202 funds and
some other programs are provided to the City or to the housing entities operating in the City.
The Redevelopment Agency addresses affordable housing through the use of the 20 percent Set-
aside Fund (including housing rehabilitation) and through replacement housing and inclusionary
housing requirements of State Redevelopment Law. The County Housing Authority implements
Federal affordable housing programs in Chula Vista under agreement with the City, including
Low-Rent Public Housing, Section 8 Rental Assistance, and Moderate Rehabilitation. The
housing authority has built three public housing projects in Chula Vista (Town Center Manor,
Melrose Manor, and Dorothy Street Manor) with City assistance, and the housing authority
administers approximately 1,000 Section 8 Rental Assistance rental subsidies in the City.
Section 8 certificates are awarded to the County Housing Authority by HUD in lump sum, and
the housing authority then allocates them to the various participating jurisdictions by
demographic need. Chula Vista has historically received over its allocation due to conditions
which make it easy to lease up participating renters. In general, the County Housing Authority
has been very responsive to Chula Vista's needs and requests.
Advanta!!:es to Havin!!: a Local Housin!!: Authoritv
· Local Autonomy
Local autonomy is the obvious advantage of having a local housing authority. As a housing
authority, Chula Vista could choose which Federal housing programs to apply for and how to
allocate resources from those programs. Chula Vista would have more flexibility in combining
and tailoring a number of programs to accomplish housing projects. Chula Vista's desires would
not be subject to Board of Supervisors approval. As an example, the County Housing Authority
has the option to commit Section 8 Rental Assistance certificates to specific housing projects
("project-based certificates"), but the County Housing Authority has refused to do so for any of
their participating jurisdictions, preferring to issue all certificates to individual clients to be used
freely on the open rental market. As the housing authority, Chula Vista could choose to issue
/ 7- r:J
Page 3, Item 17
Meeting Date 07/28/92
project-based certificates to support (make financible) a specific project the City wanted to see
developed.
· Coordination and Implementation
Additionally, creating a housing authority could offer the benefit of consolidating functions.
State Law actually creates the authority for both a housing authority and a redevelopment
agency. If both are activated in a jurisdiction under State Law, the authority created is a
combined Redevelopment/Housing Authority, called a Community Development Commission.
With the creation of a Community Development Commission, the City could delegate to that
Commission authority for administering the Community Development Block Grant Program, the
HUD Rental Rehabilitation Program, and other housing efforts that are programmatic. This
would consolidate much of the redevelopment and housing functions with one body and would
eliminate duplicative activity which is now required, such as joint meetings where the City
Council approves Community Development Block Grant funds and the Redevelopment Agency
approves Low and Moderate Income Housing funds for a single project. The municipal housing
effort would be less confusing to the public with that consolidation.
. Self-SuDoortin~ Operation Over Time
Housing authorities, over time, have been able to generate enough revenues from their
administrative fees sufficient not only to pay for their operational costs but also to pay to
supplement or expand city programs designed to increase housing opportunities. In addition,
housing authority administrative funds can be used to pay for city overhead costs and for existing
city staff that provide services to the authority.
Disadvanta!!es to Havin!! a Local Housin!! Authoritv
. Staffin~ and Physical Req.uirements and Fiscal Implications
The greatest administrative burden on the housing authority is typically the Section 8 Rental
Assistance Program. Serving Section 8 clients is very labor-intensive. Housing authority
functions include keeping waiting lists, determining program eligibility, counseling clients
on tenancy responsibilities, physically inspecting units, negotiating rental agreements with
landlords, paying out monthly subsidies, negotiating tenant/ landlord disputes, and
conducting grievance hearings. Section 8 candidates and clients regularly make office visits
to the housing authority. When new subsidies are awarded by BUD, a typically very
intensive application period occurs where housing authorities are inundated with calls and
visits. Although the number of rental subsidies that the housing authority would receive
from HUD could be anticipated to be small initially, as those subsidies increased over time
staffmg needs would grow. Initially, the following staffing additions to the Community
Development Department would be needed to begin any threshold operations as a housing
authority:
J7~3
Page 4, Item -12
Meeting Date 07/28/92
. Entry level Community Development Specialist
. Secretary
. Accounting Clerk (Part-time)
$42,131.00
28,869.00
$6,500.00
The current Housing Coordinator would administer the housing authority activities on a day-
to-day basis. The new entry level Community Development Specialist would do the
necessary case work. A new Secretary would provide clerical support and reception. The
Department's existing Administrative Analyst II would provide budgeting and accounting
support in conjunction with the part-time accounting clerk, which would be placed in the
Finance Department. Non-Section 8 administrative work would be pursued by the existing
Community Development staff.
Research with other existing housing authorities indicates that it takes about 200 Section 8
subsidies under contract to reach a financial "break even point". At that point, economies
of scale typically allow the administrative fee of 8.2 % of monthly subsidies to carry the
housing authority's administrative costs. At fewer subsidies, the 20% set-aside fund would
have to subsidize the Section 8 operation. The 20% set-aside fund currently has a fund
balance of approximately $100,000 and has large funding demands on it from such proposed
projects as South Bay Community Services Casa Cuatro Project, acquisition of Bayscene
Mobilehome Park, a relocation mobilehome park, etc. It may be possible to negotiate with
the County Housing Authority to contractually administer any subsidies the new Chula Vista
Housing Authority receives until the level of 200 subsidies is achieved and local
administration becomes cost effective.
Also, the process of creating a local housing authority would require a very substantial
amount of staff time for existing staff. HUD and the State would require significant
documentation. Enabling ordinances, administrative plans, and program funding
applications would need to be prepared and negotiated. New staff would need to be
recruited. Issues of transition would have to be worked out with the County Housing
Authority. Given the work load on existing staff, it would be important to proceed slowly
and deliberately.
The Community Development Department building would not currently be able to
accommodate housing authority activities. There is insufficient space to house the necessary
new personnel and records. Additionally, substantial retrofitting of the building would
likely be necessary to service the housing authority clientele within the guidelines of the
Americans with Disabilities Act. A capital plan to accommodate housing authority activity
would need to be developed that would look at anticipated growth of the housing authority.
. Transition of Prol:ram from County to City
The transition from a Regional housing authority to a Chula Vista Housing Authority could
create unavoidable confusion. As soon as HUD awarded subsidies to Chula Vista, there
would be two agencies issuing rental subsidies in Chula Vista, and communication and
coordination with the County Housing Authority would be essential. It is unclear whether
/7-'1
Page 5, Item ~
Meeting Date 07/28/92
the County Housing Authority would assign any or all of its existing subsidies in Chula
Vista to the Chula Vista Housing Authority, or whether it would provide the Chula Vista
Housing Authority with some proportionate share of the Administrative Reserves derived
from those subsidies. As subsidy contracts between HUD and the County Housing
Authority came up for renewal (contracts typically last five years), the City could negotiate
with HUD to take over those contracts. The ultimate goal would be for all Section 8
subsidies in Chula Vista to be under the control of the Chula Vista Housing Authority.
Reauired Chanl!es to the Discretionary Bodv
If Chula Vista establishes a housing authority, which would be combined with the
Redevelopment Agency to create a Community Development Commission, there are two
optional courses of action required by the Tenant Participation provisions of State Law.
The first option is to add two tenant Commissioners to the Commission, which would then
be made up of the five City Council members and the two tenant Commissioners. The
second option is to create a Community Development Committee to be advisory to the
Commission, with at least two tenant Commissioners on the Advisory Committee. Tenant
participation is desirable, but such participation does entail additional costs for
Commissioner training, some small additional difficulty in scheduling meetings, and another
layer of processing in the case of the Community Development Committee. It is possible
that under the second option, the existing Housing Advisory Committee could be
restructured to be the Community Development Committee. It is staffs recommendation
that one second option be considered.
SummarY
Although there are identified disadvantages to creating a Chula Vista Housing Authority
(Community Development Commission), they are disadvantages which can all be overcome with
time. The disadvantages are the result of the transition from a regional approach to a local
approach. Outweighing those temporary disadvantages is the primary advantage of local control.
Chula Vista would be best served by having the ultimate discretion for all of its housing
strategies. Once the housing authority was established and self-sufficient, Chula Vista would
have a unified, locally-controlled housing program. Chula Vista should move deliberately
towards establishing its own housing authority. The appropriate first step would be to direct
staff to return with a schedule for establishing a housing authority which includes the major
work components. Staff should also be authorized to begin discussions with HUD, the State of
California, and the County Housing Authority in order to develop that schedule, as well as to
create a detailed fiscal analysis based on further clarification of funding and subsidy transfer
positions of those organizations.
J7~~
Page 6, Item -L2-
Meeting Date 07/28/92
FISCAL IMPACT: The significant fiscal impact from the recommended action would be
unknown but substantial staff time to put together the schedule for becoming a housing authority
and to negotiate preliminarily with the affected agencies. If a housing authority is established,
ongoing, and very likely increasing, staffing and physical facilities costs would result.
Administrative revenues from HUD for Section 8 subsidies would cover those costs at the point
that 200 subsidies were under contract. After discussions with the above identified
organizations, specific fiscal projections will be able to be developed.
[C:IWP51ICOUNCIL1113SIREPORT-I.113]
I?-~
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item ) g'"
Meeting Date 7/28/92
ITEM TITLE:
Report evaluating the possibility and feasibility of paving or
closing Elm Avenue and two adjacent alleys east of Second
Avenue, between Madrona Street and "F" Street, in response to
a pet i t ion submi tted by res idents on Madrona Street, Cypress
Street, and Minot Avenue ^~
Director of Public WOrk~(,r
City ManagerJtt W ~ (4/Sths Vote: Yes_No...l.J
- 0 ~ Council Referral No. 2359
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
On July 8, 1991, the City received written communication from property owners
on Madrona Street, Cypress Street, and Minot Avenue expressing road safety
concerns and suggesting solutions to their concerns. The property owners
requested that the City consider paving or closing three dirt alleys: Elm
Avenue and two adjacent alleys east of Second Avenue, between Madrona Street
and "F" Street (these alleys are shown on the accompanying plat). Said
request was submitted to the city in the form of a petition dated July 30,
1989 and signed by 27 residents (representing 24 separate parcels).
The City Council directed staff to prepare a study on the homeowners' request
to either pave or close the alleys.
This report analyzes the homeowners' request and suggested alternatives.
RECOMMENDATION: That staff be directed to: 1) discontinue work on the
subject alley improvement until the affected property owners support formation
of an assessment district; and 2) pursue vacation of portions of alleys as
discussed subject to the payment of fees.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
The Engineering Division has completed a study to determine the possibility
and feasibility of paving or closing three dirt alleys (Elm Avenue and two
adjacent alleys east of Second Avenue, between Madrona Street and "F" Street),
as requested by City Council, addressing the petition submitted by a number of
homeowners on Madrona Street, Cypress Street, and Minot Avenue.
In the petition, the homeowners expressed the following concerns:
1. In the summer, dust gets "all over the pl ace" and into the
homes adjacent to the dirt alleys.
2. In the winter, the dirt alleys are muddy and have potholes.
3. Currently, the alleys are "paved" with gravel, which causes
vehicles to skid and lose control.
/(f'/
\10
Page 2, Item ) 8'"
Meeting Date 7/28/92
4. On several occasions, vehicles have lost control and gone
through fences into backyards.
5. The above conditions have progressively worsened over the years.
In addition, the homeowners requested that the dedicated alleys (Elm Avenue
between "F" and "G" Streets and the two alleys north and south of Cypress
Street between Second and Elm Avenues) be either paved or closed. If the City'
opts to close the alleys, the homeowners requested that the property be
returned to them.
This report presents a discussion of the two options suggested by the
homeowners (to either pave or close the alleys) in their letter and petition
to the City.
Ootion 1 involves paving the alleys in accordance with City standards, which
will require installation of an 8" thick, welded wire fabric reinforced
concrete pavement structural section. The cost of these improvements would be
approximately $235.000, including excavation, construction, design, and
contract administration (a detailed cost estimate for Option 1 is attached).
In accordance with Council Pol icy No. 505-01, improvements to the subject
alleys can be funded by the establishment of an assessment district consisting
of approximately 35 homeowners on Madrona Street, Cypress Street, portions of
Minot Avenue, and portions of Patricia Avenue and one resident on Second
Avenue. The approval of a majority of the homeowners is required to establish
an assessment district. Under an assessment district, the average cost would
be $8,150 with the cost to individual homeowners ranging from $7,750 to
$17,250.
Engi neeri ng staff di scussed the use of an Assessment Di stri ct to fund the
alley improvements with Mr. Jess Morales (resident of 155 Madrona Street and
original circulator of the petition). During the discussion, Mr. Morales
indicated that the homeowners would not favor the formation of an Assessment
District and that he felt the City should fund the alley improvements from tax
revenues. Engineering staff explained to Mr. Morales that this type of
funding and/or alternate funding is not available for alley improvements.
The cost of improving a publ ic right-of-way is ordinarily borne by the owner
of an adjacent property as a requirement associated with development of that
property. If the property is developed as part of a subdivision, the cost is
passed on to the subsequent owner.
This situation is implicit in Council Policy 576-10 which states that "No
reconstruction will be made by City forces on existing alleys which have not
been improved to the standards adopted by this policy." We are not aware of
any instances where the City has deviated from this policy except for Otay
Town where Community Development Block Grant funds are being used to finance
installation of alleys and street lights. In low income areas eligible for
CDBG funding alleys have been improved. This is not an eligible area.
J ~, ;2,
/1
\ .
Page 3, Item I r"
Meeting Date 7/28/92
ODtion 2 involves closing the alleys, which would cost approximately $18.000
to $22.500, including installation of curb, gutter, and sidewalk and three
driveway approaches (to replace the alley entrances at Elm Avenue), erection
of barricades, installation of signage, and staff time (a detailed cost
estimate for Option 2 is attached).
It shoul d be noted that it is not necessary to keep the all eys open in order
to afford adequate access by emergency service vehicles, City maintenance
vehicles, and Laidlaw trash trucks because all residences are accessible from
the existing paved surface streets that front all of the residences. In a
5/18/92 telephone discussion with Laidlaw, it was indicated that alley pickup
is preferable because less maneuvering is generally required. Also, the right
of ingress/egress to properties and of access to overhead ut i 1 it i es (i.e.,
telephone, electric, and cable television) must be maintained if the City
should opt to close the alleys.
Closing the two alleys north and south of Madrona Street would create access
problems for some residences that have "on-site" parking that is accessible
via the alleys. These residences can be classified in two ways: 1) those
residences which have dual access by use of the frontage street and by use of
the alleys; and, 2) those residences with on-site parking which is accessible
solelv by way of the alleys (these residences are identified on the
accompanying plat). The houses that fall into the latter category are located
at: 155, 159, 195, and 196 Madrona Street; 156, 157, 160, 164, 171, 186, and
195 Cypress Street; and 336 Patricia Avenue (it does not appear that the
resident at this address is signatory to the petition from the homeowners).
The residences at 155 Madrona Street and 156 Cypress Street would retain
on-site parking access, but a majority of the remaining houses will completely
lose access to their garages because access from the surface streets cannot be
facilitated by constructing new driveways and/or re-orienting their garage
doors.
In order to vacate the streets, the City Council will be required to find, on
the basis of evidence collected in a publ ic hearing, that the alleys are
unnecessary for present or prospective publ ic use in accordance with Section
8324 of the Cal ifornia Streets and Highways Code. In addition, Section 8340
all ows for the pl acement of reservat ions and/or exceptions upon the vacat ion
for specific purposes if required. The City does not own the land underlying
the alleys and the property would, therefore, revert to the property owners.
However, it is unlikely that evidence can be presented in the required public
hearing to justify a finding to vacate the alleys because of their current
usage as sol e access to several res idents I garages. Therefore, we do not
recommend this option.
If the alleys are closed, Engineering staff recommends that a fourth alley,
the 7.5 feet wide alley located south of Madrona Street between Second and Elm
Avenues, also be closed in order to eliminate possible conflicts for vehicles
that might exit Second Avenue at thi s point and reach a "dead end" at the
closed portion of Elm Avenue. This alley currently provides access to
overhead utilities (i.e., telephone, electric, and cable television), several
backyards, and one garage (at 196 Madrona Street).
/~'J
\C
Page 4, Item J tt"
Meeting Date 7/28/92
It is feasible, however, to vacate that portion of Elm Avenue south of Madrona
Street and the 7.5 ft. wi de a 11 ey south of Madrona Street from 154 Madrona
Street to the east property line of 196 Madrona. The remaining portion of Elm
Avenue cannot be vacated because it provides an alternate means of ingress and
egress and facilitates adequate circulation for the two adjacent, narrow
alleyways.
Because of the above-mentioned pos i t i on of the owners as i ndi cated to staff,
we recommend that cons i derat i on of an assessment di stri ct for improvement of
these all eys be dropped. In the event that the affected property owners
decide in the future that they wish to pursue a district, the Engineering
Division would be pleased to work with them. We further recommend that the
portion of Elm Avenue south of Madrona Street and the 7.5 ft. wide alley south
of Madrona Street from 154 Madrona Street to the east property 1 ine of 196
Madrona be vacated and an easement ma i nta i ned for overhead ut il it i es. The
total estimated cost of this partial vacation comes to $7,000 (cost estimate
attached). A vacation deposit fee of $1,000 is required prior to proceeding
with the vacation process.
FISCAL IMPACT: The cost to implement Option 1 is estimated to be
approximately $294,000. Paving the alleys could be funded through the
formation of an assessment district consisting of the 10 homeowners on Madrona
Street, 21 homeowners on Cypress Street, one homeowner on Minot Avenue, two
homeowners on Patricia Avenue, and two residents on Second Avenue. The cost
to implement Option 2 is estimated to be between $18,000 and $22,500.
WPC 5991E
KPA:File No. KY-158
/lr~'i
.
j',
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ENGINEERING DIVISION
File KY-158
COST ESTIMATE
PROJECT TITLE: Paving of Elm Avenue and Two
Adjacent Alleys
Option 1 - Paving the Alleys
DATE:
PREPARED BY:
CllECKEDBY:
2124/92
KPA
SMN
NO. ITEM QUANIITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
1 Excavation & Gradinj! (Includes Protection 725 CY $30.00 $21,750
& Restoration of Existing Improvements
2 8" P .c.e. Allev 29,350 SF $5.00 $146,750
3 Desif!lllSurveyinj! 18 18 $25,000.00 $25,000
4 Contract Administration LS 18 $10,000.00 $10,000
SUBTOTAL $203,500
CONfJNGENCIES (15%) $30,525
PROJECT TOTAL $234,025
SAY i$~5,~
/3'~
.)
.. 'j ,~
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ENGINEERING DIVISION
File KY-158
COST ESTIMATE
PROJECT TITLE: Paving of Elm Avenue and Two
Adjacent Alleys
Option 2 - Closing the Alleys
DAlE,
PREPARED BY,
CHECKED BY,
5/12/92
KPA
SMN
NO. ITEM QUAN1TfY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
1 Staff Time (Includes Full Cost Recovery) LS LS $6,000.00 $6,000
2 Barricades 8 EA $360.00 $2,880
3 Sil!11a~e LS LS $1,000.00 $1,000
4 Curb, Gutter, and Sidewalk 150 LF $35.00 $5,250
5 Driveway Approaches (3 Total) 480 SF $4.50 $2,160
6 A.C. Removal and Replacement 150 SF $5.00 $750
SUBTOTAL $18,040
CONTINGENCIES (25%) $4,510
PROJECT TOTAL $22,550
SAY i.$~2,5{)O
J 8'''' b
.,1
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ENGINEERING DWISION
File KY-158
COST ESTIMATE
PROJECT TITlE: Paving of Elm Avenue and Two
Adjacent Alleys
Option 3 - Closing Elm Ave. slo Madrona
and 7.5' Wide Alley slo Madrona St.
DATE,
PREPARED BY,
CHECKED BY ,
7/14/!Y2.
KPA
SMN
NO. ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE AMOUNT
1 Staff Time (Includes Full Cost Recovery) LS LS $3,000.00 $3,000
2 Barricades 2 EA $360.00 $720
3 Sil!lllll!e LS LS $200.00 $200
4 Curb, Gutter, and Sidewalk 40 LF $35.00 $1,400
5 A.c. Removal and Replacement 40 SF $5.00 $200
SUBTOTAL $5,520
CONTINGENCIES (25%) $1,380
PROJECfTOTAL $6,900
........... $7000
SAY :->-::?}}?:--. /::;":..- '.:. : ,::>
I~-?
. . .
" . - .
.
Written Comms: 7/16/91
.
J}
....
.
Date:
July 30.1989
City of Chula Vista Planning and Road Maintenance pept.
Bolle OWners
'1'0:
Pram:
Subject:
Elm Avenue
ElIII avenue and two other alleys are dirt alleys. In the
slIIIlIIIer time, we have the problem of dust getting all over the
. ,
place and inside our homes. In the winter. -we have mud and holes.
Just recently. a vehicle went through the fence into a back yard.
'!'his happens often. Right now, there is gravel on the alley and
vehicles skid and lose control. '!'his problem is getting worse and
nothing has been done for many years.
.
Solution: As a .dedicated alley or street, we as home owners would like these
alleys paved or closed and the property returned to the home
Olft'1ers and tax payers.
Respectively Sublllitted:
.7r~e (2-6-__.
Property OWners on Madrona. Cypress and Minot
~ Vv\~
~~
~~"\~.
WRlnEN COMMUNICATI~NS _
~ )8','6'. ~IJ/{,i1; /I.~
I
~
.
-
... . 1>0 lL t: 'I .
~. I. .
,.
E '" \\~~O 'tv \\ ">J~
n .
..J
iLl "'!
CIt..
-t-
,
k .
t> \ RT ,~\.\.~1
-
0 IlJ
'?
c. ~ ~ e s S ~1" If
.
I
L-
'0
~
,
,
,
-
-
-
. .
~ \~'T f\ ltf Y
.
'1
(\(
1
\~w::::: "
.-- 4f)T
~ I~'I" 1
. .
.
}. -'- .
.
. .
.'. ..-
.
. .
-)
...t- t..
-.
"
(!; .
......-
6 t-
- . -~--
(' / /')... -
----7--~
.
-
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
Note:
. \
... \ J,..-'
'f"-
\
\ --
\ '\/
\ '\----
~ \ --- .
Shaded parcels represent those residences with on-site parking
accessible ~ by way of the alleys. Circled addresses represent
those residences with sole access to garages via the alleyways.
lP1RtC:>~~1r JlA()~i\.1[1[C:>~: .................................
o
:z;
DRAWN BY:
It.P.A.
PROJECT TITLB
DATB:
08/26/91
PAVING OF ELM AVENUE AND TWO
ADJACENT ALLEYS 18"'"
LH:JLA V I:'IA <.A '11'HU
LHULA VI:'lA LA 91910
SPEC 00005 33 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX^
A 1-13 XX XXXX xx xx XXXX xx xx XXXX XXXX xx x;
X xx X X xx xx XX xx xx xx XXXX xx XX xx XX ^ xx XXXX xx xx XXXX xx xx xx XX XXXXXXX:
~ ~U~ nn n ~~ ~H~ un nnn n~ n nonn ~HHnnUUnUUj
I'
X xx X X XX XX XX XX xx XX XX XX XX xxxx xx, XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XXX:
X XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX i. XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XXX:
X XX X X XX XX XX XX XX XX xxxx XX XX XX xx,. XX xxxx XX XX xxxx XX XX XX XX xxxx XX X:
X XX X X XX XX xxxx XX XX XX XX xxxx XX xx, XX XX XX XX XX xxxx xxxx XX XX XX XX XXX:
X XX X X XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX xx;. XX XX XX XX XX xxxx XX XX XX xxxx XX XXX:
X XX X X XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX i XX XX XX xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx XX Xl
5b91410800
HUMMEL MICHAEL P/AGNES M
5691420 700
RUI Z SALVADOR /MARGARE T J FAMI_
Y TR T
5691421100
OLANO ALBERTO J/T ANJA J
5691421500
COOLEY BARBARA R
5691b10600
LANKFORD wILLIAM D/MARVEL R H.
/g''- J,J..
5691311000
5b91 "1 04 00
P
5691"10900
ARNOLD HAZEL 0
...,
5b91"20"00
SH OR T N A TH A N A/ R 0 SEA
o
5691"21200
STEVENS JAi"IES k/JUNE M
T
5b91"21900
kODRIGUEZ FAMILY TkUST 11-2'~
"",'.......... ....."'.... ""... 7~7~V
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXl XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXl XXXXXXXX^XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXl
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXl XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXl
JJJJJJJ~~~JJJJJ~~~~~JJJJJ~J~Jj JJJ~llll~~~ll~lllllllllllllll}
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXl XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXI XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXI XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXl XXXXXXXX^XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX) XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXxXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXl XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
5b91"10200
GIAS WILLIAM JR/~ANDA
1
p
5b9l<t20100
DCO~NELL wILLIAM M JR
5b91..2 02 UO
ALLEN LOIS L
C/U THOMAS J FANNING
5b91<t2ubUO
..EATHERBIE
o
10
o
o
N
o
o
} g'''13
......,
~691421800 - 5691421700
RODRIGUEZ FAMILY TRUST
5691200400
ALBERT F. & JOANN C. HOOPER
5691200700
RUTH C. TI ERNEY
5691202000
ROBERT COMBS-C/O BERTHA COMBS
CAROL L. SADLER - 5691421600
iiriiii:J
5691200500
JAMES & NORMA HOWARD
5691200800
ALFONSON & KRISTINE MARTINEZ
/~-'/1
5 7
ERNESTINE MONTGOMERY
00
MILTON & MAXINE MC GILL
5691200900
HAYDEN FAMILY TRUST
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
1'1
ITEM TITLE:
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
Meeting Date 7/28/92
Report on Oxford Street and First Avenue Traffic Concerns
Director of Public Works ~
City Manager Jli ~ ~
(4/5ths Vote: Yes___No-K-)
Council Referral #2516
In a letter dated on October 24, 1991, Mrs. Pamela R. Wiser of the 100 block
of Oxford Street, requested that stop signs be installed on Oxford Street at
Fi rst Avenue to reduce vehi cul ar speeds on Oxford Street. On December 12,
1991, the City Council approved lowering the speed 1 imit on Oxford Street to
30 MPH and to have staff return in six months on the effectiveness of the
speed limit change.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Counc il accept staff's recommendat i on to keep
the speed 1 imit at 30 mph and to deny the request for stop signs on Oxford
Street at the intersection with First Avenue.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: The Safety Commission at their November
21, 1991 meeting voted 5-0-2 (Commissioners Chidester and Matacia absent) to
accept staff's recommendation to deny the request for stop signs on Oxford
Street at the intersection with First Avenue and lower the posted speed limit
from 35 mph to 30 mph. The City Council at their December 12, 1991 meeting
accepted staff's recommendation to deny the stop signs and lower the speed
limit from 35 mph to 30 mph and to report back in six months on the
effectiveness of the speed limit change.
DISCUSSION:
Oxford Street is a 40-foot wide east-west residential collector street. The
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) is approximately 5,930 vehicles per day. Oxford
Street extends from just west of Broadway on the west to Nacion Avenue on the
east near the I-80S right-of-way. The posted speed limit is 30 mph east of
Thi rd Avenue except near Hi 11 top Dri ve, adjacent to Castl e Park El ementary
School, where it is 25 mph when children are present. First Avenue is a
north-south residential collector with a pavement width of approximately 38
feet. The ADT is approximately 1,530 vehicles per day. The speed limit is
posted at 25 mph.
A review of the accident history after reducing the speed 1 imit on December
30, 1991, from 35 mph to 30 mph for the subject intersection shows that there
have been no reported accidents.
The subject intersection does not meet the criteri a for an all-way stop at
this intersection. The intersection received 8 points out of a possible 54,
thereby not meeting the minimum 30 points required. The intersection received
a low rating because of the low volume of traffic on the minor street (First
Avenue). All-way stop signs are very restrictive control s and require all
motorists entering the intersection to stop at all times.
/ '1-1
Page 2, Item /9
Meeting Date 7/28/92
Stop signs are used to help assign right-of-way at intersection and are not
intended to be used for reducing motorists speed. Actually, experience has
shown that stop signs are ineffective in reducing overall speeds and certain
type of accidents. Stop signs reduce vehicle speed only within 150 feet of an
intersection. They are ineffective at reducing speeds mid-block because
motorists try to make up for the time lost slowing down for the stop sign.
Studies have shown that where a stop sign is unjustifiably posted, motorists
tend to ignore the stop sign by not coming to a complete stop, thus
endangering cross traffic.
Staff completed speed counts, after the 30 mph speed limit sign was installed
on 12/30/91, over a 48-hour period on July 13-15, 1992, using the traffic
counting equipment which yielded the following results on Oxford Street:
100 Block Oxford Street between First Avenue & Second Avenue
Before
Reducing
Speed
11/6/91
11/8/91
Eastbound
After
Reducing
Speed &
Installation
of 30 mph
Signs
7/13/92
7/15/92
Before
Reducing
Speed
11/6/92
11 /8/92
Westbound
After
Reducing
Speed &
Installation
of 30 mph
Signs
7/13/92
7/15/92
Average speed of all 31.85 30.34 38.76 33.77
vehicles
Median speed 31. 58 30.08 39.16 33.62
85th percentile speed 36.18 34.62 45.52 38.79
Mode speed 29 29 45 35
10 mph pace 25-35 23-33 35-45 27-37
10 mph pace % 84.55 86.53 79.055 76.34
200 Block Oxford Street between Second Avenue & Third Avenue
Westbound
Before After
Installation Installation
of 30 mph of 30 mph
Sign Signs
11/6/92 7/13/92
11/8/92 7/15/92
Eastbound
Before
Install-
ation of
30 mph
Sign
11/6/91
11/8/91
Average speed of all
vehicles
Median speed
85th percentile speed
Mode speed
10 mph pace
10 mph pace %
26.33
23.31
29.33
23
23-33
98.25
After
Installation
of 30 mph
Sign
7/13/92
7/15/92
28.20
27.86
31. 93
23
23-33
96.9
34.94
35.36
40.72
35
29-39
70.76
/9-,;1.
25.20
24.43
27.14
23
23-33
99.03
/1\\
Page 3, Item /~
Meeting Date~
From the above data, reducing the posted speed limit from 35 mph to 30 mph has
reduced speeds for the 100 block and westbound direction for the 200 block of
Oxford Street. Speeds increased slightly for the eastbound 200 block of
Oxford Street. The Chula Vista Police Department has been provided with a
copy of the complete speed surveys to provide enforcement during the peak
non-compliance periods of the day.
Staff is, therefore, recommending that the request for an all-way stop be
denied and that the 30 mph speed limit be retained.
FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable.
MA/KY -157
WPC G085E
Attachments: All-Way Stop Study
Area Plat
Glossary
letter Dated 10/24/91
Safety Commission Minutes 11/21/91
City Council Minutes 12/17/91
NO r sttltdNt!E-tJ
19'3
/
ii'>
~"f'
~-----"------: "~~
-cc:::. ~.",
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL WARRANTS
INTERSECTION
(J)(Pt1I2f) 5fiaJ / (./s/ ,40/'-
Major Street/Minor Street
Date: If / ,,/ (fl
Total Points ~
(1.b""l"'~ -00)
GENERAL:
A fully justified, properly installed all-way stop can effectively assign
right of way, reduce vehicle delay, and decrease accidents. Generally, an
all-way stop is reserved for the use at the intersect i on of two through
highways, and only as an interim traffic control measure prior to
signalization. Stop signs are not to be used for speed control.
.
The post i ng of an intersect i on for all-way stop control shoul d be based on
factual data. Warrants to be considered include:
1. Accident records
2. Unusual conditions
3. Traffic volumes
4. Traffic volume difference
5. Pedestrian volume
Points are assigned to each of these warrants. The total points possible are
54. The installation of an all-way stop control is justified with a minimum
of 30 points, unless anyone of the CalTrans criteria is met.
ALL-WAY STOP POINT SYSTEM CRITERIA:
1. ACCIDENT WARRANT:
Two points are assigned for each accident susceptible to correction by an
all-way stop control during one full year prior to the investigation date.
Total number of accidents correctible by all-way stop: {/
Maximum 14 points
SCORE:
()
Points
2.
UNUSUAL CONDITION WARRANT:
Where unusual conditions exist, such as a school, fire station,
playground, horizontal or vertical curves, etc.. points are assigned on
the basis of engineering judgment. Unusual conditions shall be
considered only if within 500 feet of the subject intersection. In
res i dent i a 1 neighborhoods where there is a concentrat i on of school age
children activities separated from the residential neighborhood by a
\
If
/ ?-'-I
collector street and coupled with other conditions, the Citv Traffic
Enai'neer may apply traffic engineering judgment and waive the 30-point
minimum point requirement to qualify the intersection for an all-way stop
control.
The 30-point minimum requirement miY be waived and an all-way stop miY be
installed only if less restrictive controls have not corrected a
documented problem.
All-way stops miY be justified based on projected volumes and accident
frequency when traffic signals are warranted and will be installed within
a specified period of time.
Maximum 10 points
SCORE:
D
Points
3. PEDESTRl~N VOLUMES
f
Consideration is given to large numbers of pedestrians crossing the major
street during the four busiest hours of an average day.
Pedestrian Crossina Maior Street. Total durina 4 busiest traffic hours
Volumes: I-50 51-100 101-150 151-200 201-0VER
Points: CI) 2 3 4 5
Maximum 5 points
SCORE:
\
Points
4. TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Points are dependent upon the magnitude of vehicular volumes entering the
intersection during the four busiest hours of an average day.
Traffic Counts (circle four highest hour volumes):
Hour Ending At: 11.>00 I \....~, ISOO ..._c\ '....00
Dir 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800 1900 2000
NB
SB
51 ,1.(, ',",0 '\1, \'l'L. ''hI
EB ''\1 ''\11 '7..,"1 t.~5" t'65 'L1;f 11.'1 \1.4 ~'\
~- ~\\- ,'-\'b Ill\o ''l~ ~ ~ ,,1. 1.I.I'l. m- 'l..'!.~ 1.~'l.. I'l.~ ''l.~ \\"L
''-'I.l ~. ,,\~ 'I, \'1'\. m "EI 25 l8 ffi ,,'\ \"ll; \.,1
WB 'tc 1"15 '1..0:\ ,~S "..'1 IS!! ''-''' \'\5 'l..o~ .'U1.. 'l.4o I'I'\.
''''.... \OS lIa
\ .&"L .fu.
\ ~ \ --Dot> -1ll ~ 1"\1 1'1\, Z73 'I.') '1.04 I'\,~
'1'\ \'Cl~ 121. I'l>"\ ,'5\ 'I,S \':>~ ,'IS ~\"'; ~ lfi "0 Il.~ I\~ ~a-
'lot Il,
T \1.1. ~t>S 3(,(, t.)" 'l..1t/ no ~5o ~&B "''-'lot ~,4 50'1
4<''1 3'-'''' l. ~I.\ ,,.$
-2- 19-5
Traffic ~olumes Warrant
Points shall be assigned in accordance with the following tables:
Total of Total of
Major Approach Legs Minor Approach Legs
4..hour Volume Points 4-hour Volume Points
o - 1000 0 o - 400 &,
1001 - 1300 1 401 - 600
1301 - 1600 cb 601 - 800 2
1601 - 1900 \~"l. 801 - 1000 3
1901 - 2200 4 1001 - 1200 4
2201 - 2600 5 1201 - 1400 - , 5
2601 : 2900 4 1401 - 1600 6
2901 . 3200 3 1601 - 1800 7
3201 - 3500 2 1801 - 2000 8
3501 - 3800 1 2001 - 2200 9
3801 - over 0 2201 - over 10
SCORE: ...1.. Points SCORE: ..L Points
Maximum 5 Minimum 10
5. TRAFFIC VOLUME OIFFERENCE
All-way stops operate best when the major and minor street approach
traffic volumes are nearly equal. Points shall be assigned in
accordance with the following table:
24-Hour Minor St. Aooroach Volumes
24-Hour Maior St. Aooroach Volumes X 100%. zo..o' 'f. Points
95 - 100
85 - 94
75 - 84
65 - 74
55 - 64
45 - 54
35 - 44
25 - 34 '2-Q".0\ 'I.
15 - 24
5 - 14
o - 4
SCORE:
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
Cf.l
2
1
o
3 Points
Maximum 10 Points
\
,
-3-
/9-?
CAlTRANS' CRITERIA tChaDter 4 Ca~Trans T~)
Any of the following conditions may warrant a multi-way STOP sign installation:
1. Where traffic signals are warranted and urgently needed, the multiway stop
may be an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic
while arrangements are being made for the signal installation.
2. An accident problem, as indicated by five or more reported accidents
within a 12 month period of a type susceptible to correction by a mu1tiway
stop installation. Such accidents include right- and left-turn collisions
as well as right-angle collisions.
3. Minimum traffic volumes
(a)
- ,
The total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all
approaches must average at 1 east SOO vehi cl es per hour for any a
hours of an average day, and
The combined vehicular and pedestrian volume from the minor street or
highway must average at least 200 units per hour for the same a
hours, with an average delay to minor street vehicular traffic of at
least 30 seconds per vehicle during the maximum hour, but
When the as-percent 11 e approach speed of the major street traffi c
exceeds 40 miles per hour, the minimum vehicular volume warrant is 70
percent of the above requirements.
(b)
(c)
\
"
-4- /'1- ?
NO
-
~o
-
~o
~o
r-.)o
.-
.
ALL-WAY STOP SUMMARY
INTERSECTION: O~foJ st'uT / F.'of licle
DATE INVESTIGATION WAS COMPLETED: /l111'~ I
(2..~,-'1~ -00)
TOTAL SCORE: points out of a possible 54. The minimum
required to justify an all-way stop control is 30 points.
INTERSECTION DIAGRAM:
- ,
Iv
J
~\o, .....~" C o.l\;
"..
O-A.f 0 \<.\) b\R~~T
'5\0 P 4. :;I..~ ...,~"
I-
on
.~
,z
RECOMMENDATIONS:
L7"
V<:>ea A~r
MI in IT...})' aill. LJ"1 5 7;f
rYluT 0 ~ /t!l. &1 0."s
/q-t-<4e.....J.
i..
~)eo..~
~ .,;\c ~'~'^\ OJ-.$... ''''
~e....."'~~....'-c\ c._~ ~~\\....\, o~, -I I 8
~ J rr... cJ1 <T I (I (....JA
(V~o.:\i)O-'-"'\ O,JV<A \.t.t.o........ ~ ~ j
~\C\.c..~
II d r;.
REMARKS:
fI
WPC 5546E
-5-
1</- ~
.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ALL-WAY STOP EVALUATION WORKSHEET
Intersect i on Oll FIlU.\ itll'.i\
(Major)
I t;{~i A\X.
(Minor)
File \<.~ - ,~'"
Date~
Investigator M.A.
Qualifies for All-Way Stop based on 30 or more points:
Yes No Nc Points
Qualifies for All-Way Stop based on other criteria:
If yes, explain:
Yes
No NO
- ,
.
.
Sketch of intersection with visibility data
On back Attached ~
1. Accident History Points Possible
From \ / ~ / ~ ~ to '0 / 30 / ~ \
Accidents/year correctable by Stops x 2 points/accident
() 14
2. Unusual Conditions
~oO~
o 10
3. Pedestrian Volume
Pedestrians ~ \1-. So
crossing the major street during 4 hour count
\
5
4. Traffic Volumes (Peak 4 Hours)
Major approaches ''00, v
Minor approaches 550
3
\
5
10
5. Traffic Volume Difference (.'\.0\ 'G
3
10
\
TOTAL
Minimum Points Required
2,
54
30
WPC 5546E
"
-6- /'1 -1
-..'
~ ~
.... ...
" ~
.. ::I
~
~
I
,. >
: P
't>
jJ
m
)>
-o-
r--
)>
-1=
\
..
-4
-
-4
,...
,..
..
-
-
-
- e)
-.
II
:tJ
.. l......I'
-J.. _" _.... "n ~.
I i
f U! 1\
~ .I . ~i ~
.B ~ J~ ,.. (;;)
-000~',
; I
! Ei
I
If' - .
. r--......\..
.-- ~
I , ~:
e) ~ECO~D
; ,
,
~'--~.
ElM A;[ '::
: .
Cl
r'
,.,
Z
:1-
I>
..;
,.,
z
, ,
a:
I>
-<
I
!
I
.
,
.
....-. -
-..., ,
'x ~ ~.:
'~
-: . 'tt-r-
I TOR/A"
~
~
~
<O-
r
1_... .__. ~r-'
..
.' ..:~
~g:-.
,
"
,
-~I
(
I
-~--
I
.,
" -- ,",'" t.- "'h .. .
r-.
'~) THIRD
, '
AVE e
r!jl
~
I
i ,
, ,
i ,
, t , .. , .
,
'I I; I
: I I,
! ~ ; I · f ~ .. -. .
. , . : i! :
. .
. DEL '-It-R
! 1[' '"
, I I , :
. , 1 l , to.
. ,
~ I I I
, ! 1 I I " '
, ! 1 I !
~
,
. 0 I'
~.
Z
J>
~
,.
'"
~... c.n
1 r. , I" ,
,
,WIN
i I I',!,
I I'
1"1 I rl j . -II
. I I I ,
OL...L..
AVENUE
. , l' I I
..J II }. -l'j;r , ~-
i
I ......-
><
,
,
,
, t :,1 p~
, . . .
r
OA K S I
.
AVE NUE
1
,
.... ,I .' . ,
, ., ft
. - ~
"....
. - - ,.. .....
ELM
I. AVENUE
I
I ,
iL..
z
-i
m.
(f):D. (f) -
-.-- m c:
--'-'-'nE
.-- . ., .....m 0
_"--5-.0 )0(
, r -. ,z- ,,-; ~ '
~ ....- '>~K
I ...',
,
,
, , . . . , 0-'
; ,
,
;
I l: AVENUE IV
~ \ ' ,
~
" /'
---a-
t-' PIN F
, .
- . L.., <II
..
, , I . :D
",
... , '"
, -l
)
'. . . . . . . .
D~IVE
FIP.!>T
('
AVENUE
'_l..I~
I
n'''ON
. '. .'
.'. 0'.. " . 00
If
D" ". t I
~ 1F..::~H~mT:,;!: I ! i I .Ill I i
~ Vl fl!!Jl..'T'LLl. L 1 I ;> c:::::; '. I, ~.,-
~ 8--T~ ~~;:;"-,
1-4 i Iii ~ ,-
J...8..-" ~I.,L"'OP, ~o" ORI VE
I I
.
-to' ~:
>
.
.
.
~
~
...
J...; _-=-'=.._ _,
I /9-10 I ~ffII
I
.
GLOSSARY
Average Speed
All Vehicles
Average Daily Traffic: Total volume of traffic over a 24
hour period.
Sum of all the recorded speeds divided by the total
number of vehicles recorded.
AD'l'
Median Speed
Speed which SO, of the vehicle were above and SO, were
below.
eSt}'
Percentile
Often referred to as critical speed, this speed,i. the
speed as, of the drivers travel at or below. This is the
speed used by the state of California to determine what
speed limit should be posted.
Mode Speed
The speed that was most often recorded during the survey.
\
If
/9-/1
HAWTHORHE-FIE~D SERVICE
619292e29S
~..I
.
Mrs. Pamela R. Wiser
85 Oxford St
Cbula Vista, CA 91911
(619) 427-8393
October 24, 1991
- ,
City of Chula Vista Mayor and Council Office
276 4Th Ave
Chula Vista, CA 91910
ATTN: Ms. Sbauna Stokes
Dear Ms. Stokes;
I am writing to you in regards
corner of First and Oxford St.
not on Oxford.
to having a STOP sign put on the
Their is a stop sign on First but
A STOP Sign is need at this intersection in the worst way. Within
the last four months their has been three accidents. On an average
of every other week a animal is hit and the speeding on this street
is like being on a freeway. The average speed of a car is 50 and
not only do they speed but they pass on an other as well. This
STOP sign would help the speeding, and the passing of cars. I know
one day if it has not already happen a child will be hit their is
a8Qhool not two block away.
They distance from one intersection that has a signal light is on
3Rd and Oxford and the next STOP sign is on Hilltop and Oxford St.
this is a good run for cars to speed and pass one an other.
Please give me a call at home (619) 427-8393 or work (619) 974-6874
I would like to know what can be done in this area. I have take a
ph~ of the last accident and I would be more than happy to send
a copy to you.
Please forward a copy of my request the Safety Commission.
\ Sincerely;
Pam Wiser
,
19-/~
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CHULA VISTA SAFETY COMMISSION
Thurtday, November 21,1991
7:05 p.m.
Council Chamber.
Public Service. Building
CALL TO ORDER
1. Roll Call:
Pre.ent:
Chair Braden, Commissioners Thomas, Koester, Pedilla, Pitta
Excused Absences:
Commissioners Chidester and Matacia
Also Present:
Harold Rosenberg, Traffic Engineer; Frank Rivera, As.soci,te Traffic Engineer;
Sgt. Tom Schaefer, Police Department; Shirley Buxton, Fl'ecording Secretary
2. ADDroval af Minut..
MSC (Koester/Pedillal to approve the Safety Commission Minutes of October 10, 1991 a. amended to
correct the .pelling of Agent Lederte and Agent Truel. Approved 5-0-2 with Commissioner. Chidester and
Matacia absent.
MEETING AGENDA
3. Reouest for a Traffic Slanalat East "H" Street and Bonita Vista Hlah School Drlvewav
Frank Rivera Informed the Commission that staff received a request to signalize the intersection of the Bonita
Vista High School Driveway and East .W Street. Staff evaluated this intersection for a traffic signal, but it
did not meet any warrants. If a traffic signal were installed at this location, motorists attempting a left turn
into Bonita Vista High School would have to yield to oncoming traffic, unless the traffic signal provided left
turn phasing. The location has no accident history and other than the busy 15-20 minute period in the
morning, the rest of day the motorists can yield to oncoming traffic easily because there are adequate gaps
in traffic. Staff is recommending that the request be denied. Staff has placed this location on the Traffic
Signal Priority List which will be completed in December 1991. The January Safety Commission meeting
should have the Traffic Signal Priority List for approval.
Co-Chair Thomas asked staff for the definition of an intersection.
Mr. Rivera said an intersection is where any two streets intersect.
Mr. Rosenberg said the City Attorney has given the opinion that in some situations a driveway can be
considered an intersection since it is entry into a roadway. Even though it is private property, there are many
driveways that function as a street because of traffic volumes.
MSC (PadillalThoma.1 to accept staff's report and deny a traffic signal at the intersection at East "H" Street
and Bonita Vista High School Driveway. Approved 5-0-2 with Commissioners Chidester and Matacia absent.
4. Reauest for an AII-Wav Stoo at Oxford Street and First Avenue
Traffic Engineering staff received a request from Pamela Wiser to have an all-way stop installed at First Avenue
and Oxford Street to help reduce vehicular speeds on Oxford Street between Third Avenue and Hilltop Drive.
There are no traffic controls on Oxford Street between Third Avenue and Hilltop Drive. Castle Park Elementary
School is located on Oxford between Hilltop Drive and First Avenue. The area between First and Third
Avenues is generally residential and the posted speed limit on Oxford Street is 35 mph. An all-way stop
evaluation was completed by staff, and the intersection did not meet the criteria necessary to justify an all-way
stop. A review of the accident history shows that five accidents occurred at First Avenue and Oxford Street
and were caused by vehicles which did not stop at the northbound or southbound stop sign on First Avenue.
UMO"l!!~I!PIl ^ " ft,l'.III""~ !1~~"'-
11"'11 . i.l.....ii""'IIi.~~ ll'uUtl\oV u 8
19-/3
.
Safety Commission Minutes
November 21,1991
Page 2
Although staff ia not recommending an all-way stop at this intersection, it recommends that the speed limit
be lowered from 35 mph to 30 mph, as it is on Naples Street.
,..""". Wls.., 85 Oxfon/ Street. Chula Vis". CA 979 71
Mrs. Wiser said that a stop sign is warranted because of the amount of children in the area and due to the fact
that during 2-6 pm each day there are many speeding vehicles. She has witnessed accidents in the area and
noted that vehicles pass each other on Oxford Street. There are children who are in danger of being injured
and there have been animals killed in this block. Mrs. Wiser said she is in constant contact with the Chula
Vista Police Department regarding the speeding and estimates vehicular speeds of 50-.60 mph. Even if speeds
Ire reduced, cars will still pass each other.
Commissioner Koester asked Mrs. Wiser what time of the day infractions on Oxford Street were occurring.
Mrs. Wiser said that most speeding occurs between 2-6 pm and 10 pm-2 am, and that there was not a lot of
.apeeding In the morning hours.
Chair Braden asked about the traffic volume on Oxford Street between 2-6 pm.
Mrs. Wiser said that the volume is very high during this time and felt motorists use Oxford Street because
there are no traffic controls from Third Avenue to Hilltop Drive.
Commissioner Pitts asked staff where the new 30 mph sign would be posted.
Mr. Rivera said signs would be between Third A venue and Hilltop Drive on both sides of the street.
Commissioner Pitts said he traveled this area between 2-6 pm and confirmed that speeding is a problem.
Commissioner Padilla asked Sgt. Schaefer if the area was surveyed for radar enforcement and if this was a
problem speeding Irel for the police department.
Sgt. Schaefer said there is radar enforcement in the area, and it is not a major area for the police department.
However. if the speed is lowered. it will make enforcement easier.
Mr. Riverl said the current signs on 0 xford Street will be relocated to a more visible position. The posted
signs were installed by the County of San Diego before this area was annexed to the City of Chula Vista.
MSC (Thol1llls/Padlllal to accept staff's report and deny the request for stop signs on Oxford at the intersection
with First Avenue and reduce the posted speed limit to 30 mph. Approved 5"()-2 with Commissioners
Chidester and Matacla absent.
OTHER BUSINESS
STAFF REPORTS:
8. 1991-92 CIP Status Reoort
Co-Chlir Thomas asked staff for an update on the Shell 011 project.
\
Frank Rivera said that Bill Ullrich, Senior Civil Engineer, has been working with Shell 011 Company to prepare
I contract for repairing the street.
tf
UNO!l=F!CIAL A\INUTES
17-/0/
Minutes
December 17, 1991
Page 11
AcnON ITEMS
18. REPORT TRAFFIC SIGNALATEAST"H"STREET AND BONITA V1STAHlGHSOIOOL
DRIVEWAY - Staff received a letter dated 9/12/91 from Robert J. Thomas requesting that a traffic signal be
installed at the entrance to the Bonita Vista High School and East "H" Street to facilitate left-turns into the
parking lot. Staff recommends denial of the request for a traffic signal at the intersection of East "H" Street
and the entrance to the Bonita Vista High School parking lot. (Director of Public Works)
MSC (MalcolmlMoore) to accept the report. Approved 4-0-1 with Councilman Rindone absent.
19. REPORT REQUEST FOR AN ~WAY STOP AT OXFORD STREET AND FIRST
AVENUE - In a request dated 10/24/91, Pamela R. Wiser of the 100 block of Oxford Street requested that
stop signs be installed on Oxford Street at First Avenue to reduce vehicular speed on Oxford Street. Staff
recommends denial of the request for stop signs on Oxford Street at the intersection with First Avenue and
lower the posted speed limit from 35 mph to 30 mph. (Director of Public Works)
Pam Wiser, 85 Oxford Street, Chula Vista, CA 91911, spoke in opposition to the staff recommendation. She
felt the stop sign was needed due to the excessive speeds, cars passing on the street, and the use of the street
as a short cut. If a stop sign was not installed at First Street then one should be installed at Second in order
to stop the through traffic. Six accidents had occurred at the intersection.
Mayor Nader stated the intersection was not far from where he lived and noted there were no stop signs on
the street for three-quarters of a mile. He felt there was a problem and questioned whether a lower speed
limit would be effective.
Frank Rivera, Associate Traffic Engineer, stated there had been additional enforcement in "the area since the
problem had been brought to their attention. He was unsure of the number of days of enforcement. The
85th percentile eastbound was 36 mph, westbound 85th percentile was 45 mph. He felt the difference in
speeds was due to the fact that motorists had one-half of a mile to go before reaching a stop sign when
going westbound and only a quarter-mile eastbound before reaching an all-way stop.
MOTION: (Nader) to install all-way stop signs at Oxford Street and First Avenue. Motion died for lack of
second.
Councilman Moore stated he traveled the street and did not feel that the speeding problem there was any
greater than anywhere else in the City. He acknowledged there was a speeding problem and that control
of speeding throughout the City had been a concern! complaint of his for years.
MS (MalcolmlMoore) to accept the staff recommendation with increased enforcement and a report back to
Council in six months regarding the 85th percentile speed at this location.
Councilman Malcolm agreed with Councilman Moore but did not feel stop signs should be utilized to control
speeds. If speeds were not controlled by the proposed action he would be willing to reconsider Mrs. Wiser's
request for an all-way stop in six months.
Councilman Moore questioned whether the street was utilized as a school route.
Mr. Rivera responded there were 24 pedestrian crossings at the intersection during the school hours and
therefore did not receive points.
r
~
19';'>
Minutes
December 17, 1991
Page 12
Councilman Moore stated there had been a referral in the past regarding the awarding of points for
pedestrians around schools. He also felt the City should come up with a public information item, something
positive which would include traffic statistics which could be mailed to residents.
Mayor Nader stated Council had taken action in the past to revise the warrant system and questioned
whether the new system had been utilized for the intersection.
Cliff Swanson, City Engineer, responded the new system had been utilized. Due to the pedestrian volumes
during the busiest traffic hours the intersection did receive one point out of a maximum five points.
Mayor Nader felt the warrant system may need to be revised and noted the report did not list any unusual
conditions, i.e. school route. He questioned the accident history in the staff report and noted that Mrs. Wiser
had stated there had been six accidents at the intersection.
Mr. Swanson responded the warrant system required that the accident be correctable by a stop sign.
Mayor Nader stated he would support the motion as it was an improvement over the status quo due to the
report back in six months but would still support the installation of an all-way stop.
Councilman Malcolm stated he would like to see AM. and P.M. percentiles. He noted the Safety Commission
had voted 5-0 against the installation of the all-way stop as had staff. These were not easy decisions for
Council to make and he thanked Mrs. Wiser for bringing the problem forward.
VOTE ON MOTION: approved 4-0-1 with Councilman Rindone absenL
Councilman Moore felt information regarding where students were coming from would be helpful in future
reports. .
Mayor Nader stated he would like a report from the City Manager, informational or verbal, on how the new
warrant requirements, adopted by Council, were being implemented. He expressed concern that the
Council's intent was not being carried out. He also requested explanatory material on how the
determinations were being calculated.
BOARD AND COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
None submitted.
ITEMS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR
Items pulled: 5b, 8, 9, 13A-C, 14A-B, and 15. The minutes will reflect the published agenda order.
OTHER BUSINESS
20. 01Y MANAGER'S REPORTrS)
a. Scheduling of meetings. The next regularly scheduled Council meeting will be January 7, 1992 at
4:00 p.m.
b. Appointment of Department Head - addressed under Special Orders of the Day. Recognized William
Winters, former Chief of Police for the City of Chula Vista for twenty-six years. He then introduced Rick
/~-J?
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item c:l..O
ITEM TITlE:
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
Meeting Date 7/28/92
Report on traffic concer..ns.fo~. s~nd Avenue north of E Street
Director of Public wor~~ ~
City Manager~(3~~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes___No-!-)
At the Safety Commission meeting on June 11, 1992, Ms. Gloria Attaway and Mr.
Donald Stell addressed the Commission and requested the installation of
all-way stop signs at the intersections Second Avenue at C Street and both
intersections of Second Avenue at D Street to control vehicular speeds in the
area and improve pedestrian safety.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Counci 1 accept staff's report and deny the
requests for an all-way stop at the intersect ions of Second Avenue/C Street
and both intersections of Second Avenue/D Street.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: The Safety Commission at their July 9,
1992 meeting voted 6-0 to accept staff's recommendation to deny the request
for all-way stop at the intersections of Second Avenue/C Street and both
intersections of Second Avenue/D Street.
DISCUSSION:
C Street is a residential collector street with a street width which varies
from approximately 36 feet to 40 feet. The Average Daily Traffic (ADT) on
this street is approximately 1,060 vehicles per day. C Street intersects with
the west side of North Second Avenue to form a T-intersection. North Second
Avenue in this area is relatively flat but curvilinear and the available sight
distance is adequate for the posted speed limit of 30 MPH.
Second Avenue is a north-south residential collector street with a
curb-to-curb width of 40 feet in the improved sections. The ADT is
approximately 5,360 north of C Street and approximately 7,030 south of C
Street.
Second Avenue and C Street
A review of the reported accidents at the intersection of C Street and Second
Avenue show that since January 1, 1988 to the present, a period of 4-1/2
years, there were ni ne reported accidents. It shoul d be noted that six of
these nine reported accidents involved southbound through vehicles versus
eastbound to northbound left turning vehicles. There is an existing stop sign
for eastbound C Street at this intersection.
Five of these six accidents occurred during the morning or evening peak
periods of the day and before State Route 54 was opened in December of 1990.
More likely the motorist did not wait for a sufficient gap in traffic to
attempt their left turn maneuver safely. Since traffic volumes are less than
d-tl- /
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date
;;'0
7/28/92
half of what they were two years ago on Second Avenue before Rt. 54 was opened
and the former exit at Second Avenue was closed (11,950 versus 5,660 ADT),
adequate gaps in traffic are larger and more frequent. Volumes have dropped
primarily because the off-ramp at Second Avenue was eliminated and most
motorists are using North Fourth Avenue as an alternate route. Consequently,
the accident rate at this intersection has decreased. There have been no
reported accidents at this intersection for the one year period of June 1,
1991 through May 31, 1992. Therefore, under the Accident Warrant section of
the all-way stop evaluation, there were no points assigned.
An all-way stop warrant study completed by staff shows that this intersection
received 16 points out of a possible 54; therefore, it does not meet the
minimum 30 points needed to justify the installation of an all-way stop at
this intersection. Pedestrian counts are low, 44, for the peak periods in the
day. Pedestrian counts at this intersection were completed on the Monday and
Tuesday immedi ately fo 11 owi ng the June Safety Commi ssi on meet i ng. It shoul d
be noted that although these counts were taken the last week of classes before
summer vacation, pedestrian counts taken are typical of those one would expect
on any weekday. The pedestrian count includes all individuals crossing Second
Avenue and also C Street.
Second Avenue and D Street (north)
A review of the reported accidents at the intersection of the 200 block of D
Street and Second Avenue for the period of January 1, 1988 to the present,
shows that there have been no reported accidents. Pedestrian and vehicular
volumes are too low to justify the installation of an all-way stop. This
intersection received 11 points out of 54. There is an existing stop sign for
eastbound D Street at this intersection.
Staff does not recommend that an all-way stop be installed at this
intersection due to the good safety record and lack of competing traffic for
right-of-way. An all-way stop, which is used to help assign the right-of-way,
is not needed at this location. Staff has trimmed back some of the trees on
Second Avenue which were overgrown and reducing some of the sight distance.
Second Avenue and D Street (south)
For the one year period of June 1, 1991 to May 31, 1992, there has been only
one reported acc i dent at th is intersect ion. Th is acc i dent occurred when a
westbound vehicle attempting to turn left onto southbound Second Avenue was
broadsided by a northbound vehicle. The cause of this accident was an
illegally parked vehicle along the east curb line of Second Avenue within a no
parking area (red curb). Traffic volumes and pedestrian counts at this
intersection are too low to justify the installation of an all-way stop. The
all-way stop evaluation study shows this intersection receiving 12 points out
of 54, thereby not meeting the minimum 30 points required to justify the
all-way stop. There is an existing stop sign for westbound D Street at this
intersection.
...<0 ~.2
Page 3, Item
Meeting Date
;J..(J
7/28/92
Staff does not recommend that an all-way stop be installed at this
intersection based on the all-way stop warrant study.
Staff completed speed counts util izing the traffic counting machines over a
48-hour period on June 15-16, 1992 which yielded the following results on
Second Avenue:
D Street to E Street Northbound Southbound
Average speed of all vehicles 31.42/31.36 30.67/30.78
Median speed 31. 42/31. 32 30.34/30.48
85th percentile speed 35.76/35.60 35.50/35.56
Mode speed 29/29 29/29
10 mph pace 25-35/25-35 23-33/23-33
10 mph pace % 84.47/85.03 82.42/82.30
100 D Street - 200 D Street Northbound Southbound
Average speed of all vehicles 36.77/35.63 33.27/33.26
Median speed 36.66/35.68 33.14/33.12
85th percent il e speed 43.70/41.80 40.08/39.74
Mode speed 35/35 35/35
10 mph pace 29-39/29-39 27-37/27-37
10 mph pace % 68.12/71. 71 61. 52/64.02
Most of the speeding is occurrin9 during the a.m. peak period before 8:00 a.m.
and the p.m. peak period of 3:30-5:00 p.m. The Chula Vista Police Department
has been provided with a copy of the complete speed surveys. The Police
Department has set up their Speed Monitoring Awareness Radar Trailer (SMART)
Unit on Second Avenue regularly and also provided radar speed enforcement of
the posted 30 MPH speed limit during the peak periods of the day.
Accidents which have occurred on Second Avenue at locations other than
intersections could not have been prevented by the installation of an all-way
stop. Staff does not recommend the installation of an all-way stop as a means
to reduce vehi cul ar speed on a street. Therefore, it is staff's
recommendation that since none of the three intersections met the City's
criteria for the installation of an all-way stop that the requests be denied.
At the Safety Commission meeting, Ms. Attaway and Mr. Stell mentioned that
some students from Rosebank Elementary School are not utilizing the suggested
route to school which is to go south on Second Avenue to the signalized
intersection at E Street, cross Second Avenue, then proceed east along the
north side of E Street, cross First Avenue then walk along east side of First
Avenue to the school. These students are shortcutting via Second Avenue and C
Street where they go east down the canyon through a di rt trail near the
northern end of Las Flores Dri ve and pass through Mi not Avenue where they
continue east towards the intersection of First Avenue and D Street. Children
should be encouraged to use the suggested route to school because they are
afforded right-of-way protection at all of the street crossings such as Second
~o'J
Page 4. I tern ,).. tl
Meeting Date 7/28/92
Avenue/E Street and Fi rst Avenue/E Street. The object is to reduce as many
traffic pedestrian conflicts at school crossings to a minimum so crossings
which remain can be protected more adequately. The Chula Vista Elementary
School District has been notified of tonight's meeting. Staff is also sending
a letter to the school's principal requesting that they notify the parents to
have the students use the suggested route to school.
Attached is the Suggested Route to School Plat for Rosebank Elementary
School.
With regards to pedestri an's ri ghts and duties , although there are unmarked
crosswalks at the intersection of Second Avenue and C Street and both
intersections of Second Avenue and D Street, per the Cal Hornia Vehicle Code
Section 21950, the driver of a vehicle shall yield the right-of-way to a
pedestrian crossi ng the roadway wi thi n any marked crosswalk or withi n any
unmarked crosswalk at an intersection. This shall not relieve a pedestrian
from the duty of us i ng due care for hi s or her safety. No pedestri an shall
suddenly leave a curb or other place of safety and walk or run into the path
of a vehicle which is so close as to constitute an immediate hazard. No
pedestri an shall unnecessarily stop or delay traffi c whil e in a marked or
unmarked crosswalk.
All major street cross i ngs such as Second Avenue/E Street and Fi rst Avenue/E
Street are signalized. These are the crossings intended for students
attending Rosebank Elementary School to use.
FISCAL IMPACT: $200 all-way stop (each intersection). There will be .no
fiscal impact if the staff recommendation is approved.
MA:KY-1l9
WPC 6078E
Attachments: All-Way Stop Study (3)
Area Plat
Glossary
Pedestrian Counts
Rosebank Elementary School Plat
Safety Commission minutes dated 6/11/92 and 7/9/92 (excerpt)
\~ I\)
I" ~r;
~~l
.2()' 'f-
J
Y
.
.
.
Safety Commission Minutes
June 11, 1 992
. Page 3
. "r.~^~E~t.""1! A ~ l':,~ u\.!'r 'TI;~
\...! ~~,~7;1 a 1_'- ~~~~.,.?:\ rh '--\:1'8 b t't ~ l;;~
.
felt that due to the strong opposition from the residents, it would be best at this time to take a "wait
and see" position.
..
Commissioner Matacia recalled that the residents said shortcutting has always been a problem and a
safety issue because of the yolume of cars. He said that if the Commission did not address the safety
issue, then they were not doing their task.
Hal Rosenberg said that the perceived problem may not exist once the construction work is completed.
He asked the Commission to wait and give staff a chance to assess whether the students continue to
shortcut through the area. He felt the improvements would solve the problem.
Chair Braden asked how wide the median would be if installed.
,
Hal Rosenberg said it would be 24' wide and explained the dimensions necessary for a center land-
scaped median.
Commissioner Matacia said that he did not see any reason to change their voting on the temporary
median and asked if staff was going to recommend this to Council.
Mr. Rosenberg said he would forward the Safety Commission recommendation to the City Council.
MSUC IPadillafThomesl That the Safety Commission accepts staff's recommendation to deny the
Installation of a raised median on Telegraph CanyOJ1 Road across Apache Drive until such time when
the construction on Telegraph Canyon Road Is completed and a traffic study of the area shows that
a significant impact of vehiclesshortcuttinll through Apache Drive affecting the safety of area residents
can only ba mitigated by the installation of a raised median.
B. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Gloria Attaway, 252 Sea Vale Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 addressed concerns of parents whose
children use the area of Second Avenue from E Street to Sweetwater Road. Second Avenue is a major
thoroughfare, and it is not only neighborhood traffic. There are no signal lights, cross walks, or stop
signs between E and Sweetwater Road. She said the Chula Vista Police Department has done a good
job enforcing the area, but it is not enough to deter all motorists. There are approximately 15
kindergarten and first graders who wait on Second Avenue for the Rosebank school bus between D
and C Avenues. There are 20-25 elementary school children who walk the area to Rosebank. There
have been three accidents in the last six months, one resulting in a death, one an injury to an
elementary school boy, and one resulting in property damage. She felt stop signs on Second Avenue
at both C and D Streets will provide the necessary traffic control measure for this "family populated
area. .
Donald Stell, 210 Sea Vale Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 repeated Ms. Attaway's recommendation
for the stop signs on Second Avenue on C and D Streets. He asked that a study be performed and
for this item to be placed on next agenda of the Safety Commission. Not only are there children in this
area, but elderly people walk along Second Avenue. He said it Is not safe to cross Second Avenue,
unless pedestrians go up to E Street and cross at the light. Children cross Second Avenue to play with
friends and it is unsafe for these children to cross. Mr. Stell stated he does not allow his children to
cross Second Avenue. He pointed out that every letter street in Chula Vista that intersects with a
numeric street has a traffic control device.
Vice Chair Thomas asked Frank Rivera if he recalled this issue coming up before the Commission
approximately one year ago.
/'
)tJ/J;
Safety Commission Minutes
June 11, 1992
ePage4
UNOfFmCIAl fiUNUTE;-
Frank Rivera recalled that at that time, the Safety Commission tabled this item until SR-54 was
completed. He informed Mr. Stell and Ms. Attaway that this item will be on the agenda for July 9,
1992.
STAFF REPORTS
9. 1991-92 CIP Status ReDort . Distributed for Commissioner information.
10. Chula Vista Police Deoartment Traffic Summary for Aoril 1992 - Distributed for Commissioner
information.
11 . Status Reoort on Shell Oil Car Wash at Bonita Glen Drive - Distributed for Commissioner
information.
OTHER BUSINESS
12. Roberts Rules of Order
Frank Rivera distributed three Roberts Rules of Order booklets that he had purchased. There are six
.more on order. The books were distributed to the new Chair Bob Thomas and Vice Chair Steve Padilla
and Ollie Braden.
13. Commissioner Comments None.
14. Commission WorkshoD
Staff distributed another draft report in response to Council Referrals 1267 and 2557 regarding the
Role of the Safety Commission.
Vice Chair Thomas said that since he did not see any real difference in recommendations, he was ready
to recommend Option 1 which would require a charter amendment to make the Safety Commission
a decision making group.
MSC (Thomas/Pitts) to accept Option 1 and prepare a report to the City CouncD. Approved 6-1 with
Commissioner Chidester voting no.
ADJOURNMENT
MSUC (Koester/Matacia) to adjourn at 8:30 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
.
.:SAFETYJOet 112.MIN
dO~b
0111112
.
l
:"'~j
~ ~a...._____....__
., ,
i I : .
~-_..-:
i :
-
~'"
'I ~-~.~ ..:~~ " ~....
'.U ~ r-7~,~~
...........(.::.:~ \
II ,"~::: l:.:....,. '. .:::ni:.. 'j
, . ~ .... ""
:; I '~1' ....
J . t . ":
._~..---l~
I; ~ I,i '.:f -':"'-;f":::~
.f I, .. ... .,_~
/" ". .--.1 .
'!--"i _.. ,..-
Ii; ~;.~ li~
I l.....;; : ;: :: i .1
.. i ~::~:::; I
1IU'l"':!':-; I
,:' . f~::. :~: !
0,. '___
. I, r-- -:- :::-: ;:'u
. : ~I.:; .(~.!; :~.:.
, : ~. :.'.~. ~ ;.. :~ '.:' ,:' "~:
L.
;;..
:-:.. . v
.
<.
ST"E
""aT'O"'A ":TY
~
i
.,
.
I ~ r "
"'1 . ,_"_
7---'-----
" I
, i
I
,
~
w
,
.
w
>
.
~ITY'
/
,
Q
.
.
tl
~I
'1
I
I
I
I
..
"'Tt
- ..
..
---
.,
"
" .. 'I'
"It :
: .. . : "'-::::H .'
,.~.: :...:..:: lL.:.__.'
rG~nrlG'
I 'I -:0 I.;> ,:J ....
.:!:~' I.~ _;......
U'i!.t~. Lr'LJ!' .'
.. 'L' f
- --. ~
_.--./,. .~ .OS(~..
--/. f[i
E L;:.J...
. .~ . "'- -. .
nIJ .' . ,...;7 .
..~ ... . ,ar~,
~ ..-. "1:', "
- ;:'J I." I t~ .
-.. -_. a:, -:. fL" ,~f " '4~~
\, Ii" .:"1. 7'i... il
n.'~ [ ~ -~~. :.1 '
. . i _.....~~~: .
. - . . J I .
., r\". I ~...".. -&.:1
..... , .., ".". I . ;r--"J,
" . 'ii '.' 1-" ( '..11
~ .., ' I::: : :;! : : ::::-- ;-.._......, " ,. ."
... . ......1....... I _ t-...:.r---:
:. "-. J4 .. .. . j. ... .I.' .~.. ..:::,--" "
."~ "
r - . . ... .
!
ORAWN 'BT.
------------
MA
r I r L E
'ARE,A
. . PL'A T :2!)~?
OAr E . 6/29/92
"---
.
GLOSSARY
ADT
Average Daily Traffic: Total volume of traffic over a 24
hour period.
Average Speed
All Vehicles
Sum of all the recorded speeds divided by the total
number of vehicles recorded.
Median Speed
Speed which 50% of the vehicle were above and 50% were
below.
85th
Percentile
Often referred to as critical speed, this speed,is the
speed 85% of the drivers travel at or below. This is the
speed used by the State of California to determine what
speed limit should be posted.
. Mode Speed
I
The speed that was most often recorded during the survey.
CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL
STOPPING OIST ANCE CHART
'," ," , '. . BRAKING DISTANCE
TOTAL
FEET
MPH
25
35
45
55
65
61.7
106
161.5
22B
305.7
~
THINKING 0151 ANCE . d'itiJnCe h,1veled belc..'! bfake~ Jrt' JPp!,rr~ ...1"le
dl1l1e. Ii leachng 10 d,)nger
BRAKING DIST ANC[ dl~1ance traveled alter brakei nJve bee" JDpl':>d
m,) pantC itop ~llua',on.
.
){J/t
.~/15 S::l",:~\ bus dvcp ot;b
S/O C" St. C!2 3',2.7P-M.
II
58:D'JO
AVENU;;
A
. SchOol b..s p;tk vp
, 5/0 "c" ~ ~ 8',0'2.~t
'c sn<e= - ~II
G
II
c
i
f((vJ6-;:8
W1
W8\
J ~sideual~
,
PEDESTRIAN COUNTS
DATE. <tr \5-<12. LOCATION. SEL.DND AVE" C $"Q.~ I
erlME A A B B C C D D
SchOOl age Adu. age SchOolaga Adu. age School age Adu. age SchOol age Adu. age
(2' SZ \ 0 >6 I . /
245.. 3:00 ~ , ;
I
,j 3CO-=-:15 0 0 e 0 ~ 0' / /
.z. 0 (2 II 9' ~ /
Ii" 3',15-3'30 0 /
-:-
S jif I Mill \ .0 0 I /
3'"30-3:45 I
TOTAL 0 I 6 4 0 0 "I /
REMARKS: / /
TIME / j .
~ 7:45-8:0::: ,g ft I II JZ5 >Z5
.... 1J2'
~ S'CO~B'.15 I j2f /I I 0
~ E)',IS-8'3: .
)?5 ~ t?f 1/ fZJ ~
TOTAL I 0 -::', 5 0 0
d-,O~o;
-
-
.
LOCATE AND IlARk WITH
A COLORED 'ENCIL YOUR
RESIDENCE ON THE IIA'
SELECT AND IlARk A ROUTE
TO THE SCHOOL WITH THE
MOST TRAFFIC CONTROL
DEVICES (SIGNALS AND
CROSSING GUARDSI, TRY
TO SELECT THOSE STREETS
WITH SIDEWALKS,
WALk THE ROUTE WITH YOUR
CHILD SO THAT HE OR SHE
BECOMES FAMILIAR NITH
THE ROUTE, EM.HASIZE 'HE
HEED FOR SAFE WALliNG
HAIITS SUCH AS: LOOk
10TH WAYS BEFORE CAOSSING
A STREETI CROSS AT INTER-
SECTIONS ONLY; DO NOT WALK
OR RUN FROM A .ARkED CARl
ETC.
..
TROUSDAL.
DAI vE
o
'"
...
..
"
<3'
%
~
'"
i
c ST
Cll1 OF 'MULA VISTA
o STREET
D'
1'.IIN OAKS CIR
'E'
"
.
Legend:'
. Safety Patrol
o Traffic Signal
t::\ Safety Patrol &
\!I Traffic Signal
Crosswalk
.. Stop Sign
-. Reute.
'N...
Rosebank Elementary School
;JCJ - / f)
.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL WARRANTS
INTERSECTION <::'t~0\) k~ I 'c' <W\ltt\
Major Street/Minor Street
Date: (/..2~- q;;l.
Total Points \6
(~a~\G -00)
GENERAL:
A fully justified, properly installed all-way stop can effectively assign
right of way, reduce vehicle delay, and decrease accidents. Generally, an
all-way stop is reserved for the use at the intersection of two through
highways, and only as an interim traffic control measure prior to
signalization. Stop signs are not to be used for speed control.
The posting of an intersection for all-way stop control should be based on
factual data. Warrants to be considered include:
1. Accident records
2. Unusual conditions
3. Traffic volumes
4. Traffic volume difference
4IIt 5. Pedestrian volume
Points are assigned to each of these warrants. The total points possible are
54. The installation of an all-way stop control is justified with a minimum
of 30 points, unless anyone of the CalTrans criteria is met.
ALL-WAY STOP POINT SYSTEM CRITERIA:
1.
ACCIDENT WARRANT:
Two points are assigned for each accident susceptible to correction by an
all-way stop control during one full year prior to the investigation date.
"1,/9/ - s/3IJ'1~
Total number of accidents correctible by all-way stop: 0
Maximum 14 points NO R.~~...JJ, ",c.Li dt.,~ SCORE: a Points
.,..f- -rh;5 i,,+.vseC.t,'Oy')
UNUSUAL CONDITION WARRANT:
2.
.
Where unusual conditions exist, such as a school, fire station,
playground, horizontal or vertical curves, etc., points are assigned on
the basis of engineering judgment. Unusual conditions shall be
considered only if within 500 feet of the subject intersection. In
resi dent i a 1 nei ghborhoods where there is a con cent rat i on of school age
children activities separated from the residential neighborhood by a
;20 ~ J!
.
collector street and coupled with other conditions, the Citv Traffic
Enaineer may apply traffic engineering judgment and waive the 30-point
minimum point requirement to qualify the intersection for an all-way stop
control.
The 30-point minimum requirement miY be waived and an all-way stop miY be
installed only if less restrictive controls have not corrected a
documented problem.
All-way stops miY be justified based on projected volumes and accident
frequency when traffic signals are warranted and will be installed within
a specified period of time.
Maximum 10 points
SCORE:
10 Points
3. PEDESTRIAN VOLUMES
Consideration is given to large numbers of pedestrians crossing the major
street during the four busiest hours of an average day.
Pedestrian Crossina Maior Street. Total durina 4 busiest traffic hours
------
Volumes: 6) 51-100 101-150 151-200 201-0VER
-~)4Lj
Points: ~ 2
Maximum 5 points
3
4
5
SCORE:
Points
.
4. TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Points are dependent upon the magnitude of vehicular volumes entering the
intersection during the four busiest hours of an average day.
Traffic Counts (circle four highest hour vo)umes):
Hour Ending At:
Dir 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 ~~ ~ ~~ 1900 2000
3; \C~ ,-;l \"\l. It.'"' \'6") ;16 ~;(t.; 2~~ ;1.,5 ;!.0L n4 ;'10 23l.j Ih
NB ~ 3~_ ~'I 1'-14 \II Ie:) E-o'e In ~ ~ ~I,- ;1.4\ .33i l~~ ~
-' -- ~()1 ',).<0 n'\ \'\?. .;l('\ i:13 ,2.13 c;lcl 14\
1N0-. n. (.1- \~) I~C \-:)'\ I~'-I
'\ (.~ '1\ I':l.c \ \::l. lilt, 11.'6 1'\1 \t,.q 1~4 :1:5c 23;2 ac,! .54 11\
SB \~ '3l. \':>1 \~c ILl D-J 1'15 ~\\ I'D. :In ~4'\ :n1 aid \~E \"1
.- !l3L
- 1~5m I~'). ~ht \1(, ;;l1'1 gc ;156 Ifl TIT
flVG. II '13 \).1.. \""3'6
..
EB - -
- -
. WB ;;l.;;l. ~'\ 3lo 4g
5 7f ;,1 XI- ~~ 48 3't 5,-\ 5'S t(1 Ill>
3- LL ~1. 4(; 3L 34. 2l. i1.. AL ~ 3g 5c ..i.!.... 1/5 ;24
Aw..- . 4 ,0 ;;(Lj 31..1 31 ),8 '-10 45 43 f.t3 '3S' :5), 53 43 ;0
T 4\ I-JC ;1.81 33'1 3et 7)ic 4;).9 4sa ~~~ L64 Sy1 51/ ~I.:J. '-\6 ~(1;l.
-2- @ ~ <D G:,
J-O - ;:L
lraffic Volumes Warrant
tit Points shall be assigned in accordance with the following tables:
,
Total of Total of
Major Approach Legs Minor Approach Legs
4-hour Volume Points 4-hour Volume Points
o - 1000 0 o - 400 \~~ cp
1001 - 1300 1 401 - 600
1301 - 1600 2 601 - 800 2
1601 - 1900 cV 801 - 1000 3
1901 - 2200 \ c., ') 0 1001 - 1200 4
2201 - 2600 1201 - 1400 5
2601 - 2900 4 1401 - 1600 6
2901 - 3200 3 1601 - 1800 7
3201 - 3500 2 1801 - 2000 8
3501 - 3800 1 2001 - 2200 9
3801 - over 0 2201 - over 10
SCORE: ~ Points SCORE: .9- Points
Maximum 5 Minimum 10
5. TRAFFIC VOLUME DIFFERENCE
.
All-way stops operate best when the major and minor street approach
traffic volumes are nearly equal. Points shall be assigned in
accordance with the following table:
-:ice 24-Hour Minor St. Aooroach Volumes 563 VI'
)oc..,:1. 24-Hour Maior St. Aooroach Volumes X 100% & Sell;>." "10 Points
95 - 100
85 - 94
75 - 84
65 - 74
55 - 64
45 - 54
35 - 44
25 - 34
15 - 24
5 - 14
o - 4
\\I.a":\'I.
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
o
\
Points
SCORE:
,
.
Maximum 10 Points
.
-3- J..O - rJ
.
.
i
.
CALTRANS CRITERIA CChaoter 4 CalTrans Traffic Manual)
Any of the following conditions may warrant a multi-way STOP sign installation:
1. Where traffic signals are warranted and urgently needed, the multiway stop
may be an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic
while arrangements are being made for the signal installation.
2. An accident problem, as indicated by five or more reported accidents
within a 12 month period of a type susceptible to correction by a multiway jVO
stop installation. Such accidents include right- and left-turn collisions ___
as well as right-angle collisions.
/1;0
-
3. Minimum traffic volumes
The total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all
approaches must average at least 500 vehicles per hour for any a t:!!?
hours of an average day, and
(b) The combined vehicular and pedestrian volume from the minor street or
highway must average at least 200 units per hour for the same a /JO
hours, with an average delay to minor street vehicular traffic of at ___
least 30 seconds per vehicle during the maximum hour, but
(a)
(c) When the as-percent il e approach speed of the major street traffi c Nt:.7
exceeds 40 miles per hour, the minimum vehicular volume warrant is 70
percent of the above requirements.
-4- 20-/'/
.
.
.
ALL-WAY STQP SUMMARY
INTERSECTION: ';)~c....Q\-:'\) !\,,~ I" c.:' S\Je.(.\-
( 707 IV -00)
DATE INVESTIGATION WAS COMPLETED: (P-.;l9-~J. /
/ JA,.A.J~ f?-
TOTAL SCORE: \C; points out of a possible 54. The minimum
required to justify an all-way stop control is 30 points.
INTERSECTION DIAGRAM:
\
I
i
,
--,
i
,
./
w
~
o
z
o
()
w
(/)
.C. STREET .-.9
rY)
--~
. :R-'( w...."'S)
W~
W8\
~
o
-u
0""
R-\ -_
-
-
-
r h- s;d~WoJ/(
4(/
RECOMMENDATIONS:
\)0 ,,~ ,'",.J,.jJ ~- ~'C\ ..,,\O~ . \i:..dc~'\ ~~
'"R.... ~ a.~~ Il'\.. e:.....\ TJClV\S {(~i"...Js
REMARKS:
e;.)-rJ,,,....,,d. ~\,,~
. \
~'\J'" 0..'-1.......0.
\ X "t"
\...... ~ ~\:..t 0.:
~\I c.t. \'
WPC 5546E
/'
-5- ;20 r /)7
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ALL-WAY STOP EVALUATION WORKSHEET
.
Intersection ~cC'c0\) l\1J€. J 'c." $\Iet-t
(Major) (Minor)
File ~0110
Date ~-J&-q.~
Investigator M A.
Qualifies for All-Way Stop based on 30 or more points:
Yes No 'f... Poi nts \ &,
Qualifies for All-Way Stop based on other criteria:
If yes, explain:
Yes
No X
Sketch of intersection with visibility data
On back At tached \>,.5:S S
,
1. Accident History Points Possible
From U / I d I to (; / J5 / 9;1.
Accidents/year correctable by Stops x 2 points/accident
c/> 14
.
. 2. Unusual Conditions
-
c.vr\l,'JI'I"'IE:lt.r ro.ctdl.(.)ctl..l
.r?'HI'~$/nq .,-f/~+ imL?[c-(/e~i~
t1 '
nOftl, of
c. streeT
~10
3. Pedestrian Volume
Pedestrians < -)rJ
crossing the major street during 4 hour count
5
4. Traffic Volumes (Peak 4 Hours)
Major approaches VI, ::;()
Minor approaches \1Slt
4
(J
5
10
5. Traffic Volume Difference Ie. eli,
10
.
TOTAL
Minimum Points Required
,6
54
30
WPC 5546E
-6-
,).,o~ )0
.
.
.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL WARRANTS
INTERSECTION ~~ttI~\) f\IJE I '~" ~\. (NO/ZTH)
Major Street/Minor Street
Date: ~
Total Points \ \
(\'SI'bo -00)
GENERAL:
A fully justified, properly installed all-way stop can effectively assign
right of way, reduce vehicle delay, and decrease accidents. Generally, an
a ll-way stop is reserved for the use at the intersect i on of two through
highways, and only as an interim traffic control measure prior to
signalization. Stop signs are not to be used for speed control.
The posting of an intersect i on for all-way stop control shoul d be based on
factual data. Warrants to be considered include:
I. Accident records
2. Unusual conditions
3. Traffic volumes
4. Traffic volume difference
5. Pedestrian volume
Points are assigned to each of these warrants. The total points possible are
54. The installation of an all-way stop control is justified with a minimum
of 30 points, unless anyone of the CalTrans criteria is met.
ALL-WAY STOP POINT SYSTEM CRITERIA:
1. ACCIDENT WARRANT:
Two points are assigned for each accident susceptible to correction by an
all-way stop control during one full year prior to the investigation date.
Total number of accidents correctible by all-way stop: ~
2.
Maximum 14 points NO R.~(\..tu\ o.u,~...J\
UNUSUAL CONDITION WARRANT:
c!b Poi nts
SCORE:
Where unusual conditions exist, such as a school, fire station,
pl ayground, horizontal or vertical curves, etc., points are assigned on
the basis of engineering judgment. Unusual conditions shall be
considered only if within 500 feet of the subject intersection. In
residential neighborhoods where there is a concentration of school age
children activities separated from the residential neighborhood by a
JO~17
.
.
.
W.B
,; B
collector street and coupled with other conditions, the Citv Traffic
Enoineer may apply traffic engineering judgment and waive the 30-point
minimum point requirement to qualify the intersection for an all-way stop
control.
The 30-point minimum requirement mAY be waived and an all-way stop may be
installed only if less restrictive controls have not corrected a
documented problem.
All-way stops may be justified based on projected vol urnes and accident
frequency when traffic signals are warranted and will be installed within
a specified period of time.
Maximum 10 points
SCORE: ~ Points
3. PEDESTRIAN VOLUMES
Consideration is given to large numbers of pedestrians crossing the major
street during the four busiest hours of an average day.
Pedestrian Crossina Maior Street. Total durina 4 busiest traffic hours
Volumes: ~ 51-100 101-150 151-200 201-0VER
Points: C2:) 2 3 4 5
Maximum 5 points
SCORE:
\
Points
4. TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Dir
Points are dependent upon the magnitude of vehicular volumes entering the
intersection during the four busiest hours of an average day.
Traffic Counts (circle four highest hour voJumes):
Hour Ending At: .
0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200@ 1400 150098@ 1900 2000
\"lS \~3 \s<6 \'5b ().33 'J.5? ;;Ul ;Ul ~~a 3A.5" ;2~S J,lr 185
3.3 ~I
NB
SB \ =- '1"\ 151 no \1.\ IS", \'15 a\\ \~~ aS3 24'\ ,n, ~(,3 \~8 \4\
I')
5& 1-1 10 (.c 11 (,8 1-1 t() '5"1 'l1 1'1 (.~ "g 4'1
T
&/
4<"4 5~1 ~~;.
)()~/Z
CD~:!. 'S '1"\ ~'1~ TiS
~c l.t 4 d.3 '-\31 ~t'\ ~ ~<.. 4~\' 5~"I
-2- Ly
.
Traffic Volumes Warrant
Points shall be assigned in accordance with the following tables:
Tota 1 of Total of
Major Approach Legs Minor Approach Legs
4-hour Volume Points 4-hour Volume Points
o - 1000 0 o - 400 JI(, c:P
1001 - 1300 1 401 - 600
1301 - 1600 2 601 - 800 2
1601 - 1900 ;llj~ 3 801 - 1000 3
1901 - 2200 <::F' 1001 - 1200 4
2201 - 2600 1201 - 1400 5
2601 - 2900 4 1401 - 1600 6
2901 - 3200 3 1601 - 1800 7
3201 - 3500 2 1801 - 2000 8
3501 - 3800 1 2001 - 2200 9
3801 - over 0 2201 - over 10
SCORE: .!:L Points SCORE: .tt Points
Maximum 5 Minimum 10
5. TRAFFIC VOLUME DIFFERENCE
.
All-way stops operate best when the major and minor street approach
traffic volumes are nearly equal. Points shall be assigned in
accordance with the following table:
24-Hour Minor St. Aooroach Vol urnes ~ Jl- loe = \V>, \\"/"
24-Hour Maior St. Aooroach Volumes X 100% K ~q5o Points
95 - 100 10
85 - 94 9
75 - 84 8
65 - 74 7
55 - 64 6
45 - 54 5
35 - 44 4
25 - 34 \l.o, \\ 0/" 3
15 - 24 2
5 - 14 1
o - 4 0
SCORE: ~ Points
" Maximum 10 Points
.
-3-
df)~/1
.
I
.
,
.
CAlTRANS CRITERIA (Chaoter 4 CalTrans Traffic Manual)
Any of the following conditions may warrant a multi-way STOP sign installation:
1. Where traffic signals are' warranted and urgently needed, the multiway stop
may be an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic
while arrangements are being made for the signal installation.
2. An accident problem, as indicated by five or more reported accidents
within a 12 month period of a type susceptible to correction by a 'multiway
stop installation. Such accidents include right- and left-turn collisions
as well as right-angle collisions.
3. Minimum traffic volumes
(a) The total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all
approaches must average at least 500 vehicles per hour for any a
hours of an average day, and
(b)
The combined vehicular and pedestrian volume from the minor street or
highway must average at least 200 units per hour for the same a
hours, with an average delay to minor street vehicular traffic of at
least 30 seconds per vehicle during the maximum hour, but
When the as-percent 11 e approach speed of the major street traffic
exceeds 40 miles per hour, the minimum vehicular volume warrant is 70
percent of the above requirements.
(c)
-4-
\J~
~
Nt
-
t-lc
-
I-lC
-
NO
-
.
I
.
.
..
ALL-WAY STOP SUMMARY.
INTERSECTION: ~~t.ON\) ~~~ I "~" $\.
. (jOO blocI:-)
DATE INVESTIGATION WAS COMPLETED: tD- ~ l\- '\:)...
( IS- rg D -00)
TOTAL SCORE: I I points out of a possible 54. The minimum
required to justify an all-way stop control is 30 points.
INTERSECTION DIAGRAM:
N
t
"0" STREET
3(x) bloc...k
~
"l-
~
a
1)
ef!, .....,>
w
~
~'
~
$6
::>.
r
R-\ 0 .38'
Z
0 t
0 #/3
-- W
(/)
RECOMMENDATIONS:
\0 C~"'G \\:...... ~\..\. - \UtJ ~o~ ~ c\o~ '1\.0\ ~d_'\
t.,~ 0- ~'\I"-,,,s ~t..~~.
REMARKS:
WPC 5546E
-5-
.
.
"
.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ALL-WAY STOP EVALUATION WORKSHEET
Intersection
~E(b1Jj) 1il/5./
(
(Major)
File 151&;
Date ~,:21- 9J
Investigator 111.11.
Up It ~Tte.er
(Minor)
Qualifies for All-Way Stop based on 30 or more points:
Yes No)(. Points -1L-
Qualifies for All-Way Stop based on other criteria:
If yes, explain:
No X
Yes
Sketch of intersection with visibility data
On back Attached Y"(f- "
I, Accident History Points Possible
From U / \ / ~l to ~ / d.. -:; / "fJ.
Accidents/year correctable by Stops x 2 points/accident
(J 14
2,
Unusual Conditions
S''l/'+ d ,\ +"~O2. +0" orfJ,
~b:tiU",-; /, c'-+ "t-I n i e d b J -tr.e.e s
",Icn" wc>,,"t c -.;rb J;,0L, ( T;~ +0 L,R.. t-,i,.,_J.
(/
10
4
3, Pedestrian Volume
Pedestrians ~a
crossing the major street during 4 hour count
I
5
4. Traffic Volumes (Peak 4 Hours)
Major approaches :J. \ 3.'\
Minor approaches ~\(b
4-
IJ
5
10
5.
\\.0, \\ I/~
,
10
:2
Traffic Volume Difference
TOTAL \\
Minimum Points Required
54
30
WPC 5546E
-6-
.
.
.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL WARRANTS
Date: 6-30 -~:;.
INTERSECTION
~H.o~~ f\~b 1 \f \)' ~/Ili\ ('::.o~\\..)
Major Street/Minor Street
Total Points \d..
( \'53c -00)
GENERAL:
A fully justified, properly installed all-way stop can effectively assign
right of way, reduce vehicle delay, and decrease accidents. Generally, an
all-way stop is reserved for the use at the intersection of two through
highways, and only as an interim traffic control measure prior to
signalization. Stop signs are not to be used for speed control.
The posting of an intersection for all-way stop control should be based on
factual data. Warrants to be considered include:
1. Accident records
2. Unusual conditions
3. Traffic volumes
4. Traffic volume difference
5. Pedestrian volume
Points are assigned to each of these warrants. The total points possible are
54. The installation of an all-way stop control is justified with a minimum
of 30 points, unless anyone of the CalTrans criteria is met.
ALL-WAY STOP POINT SYSTEM CRITERIA:
I. ACCIDENT WARRANT:
Two points are assigned for each accident susceptible to correction by an
all-way stop control during one full year prior to the investigation date.
Total number of accidents correctible by all-way stop: \
Maximum 14 points
SCORE:
~ Points
2.
UNUSUAL CONDITION WARRANT:
Where unusual conditions exist, such as a school, fire station,
playground, horizontal or vertical curves, etc., points are assigned on
the basis of engineering judgment. Unusual conditions shall be
considered only if within 500 feet of the subject intersection. In
residential neighborhoods where there is a concentration of school age
children activities separated from the residential neighborhood by a
.
.
.
collector street and coupled with other conditions, the Citv Traffic
Enaineer may apply traffic engineering judgment and waive the 30-point
minimum point requirement to qua11fy the intersection for an all-way stop
control.
The 30-point minimum requirement mAY be waived and an all-way stop mAY be
installed only if less restrictive controls have not corrected a
documented problem.
All-way stops I!l.U be justified based on projected volumes and accident
frequency when traffic signals are warranted and will be installed within
a specified period of time.
Maximum 10 points
SCORE: ~ Points
3. PEDESTRIAN VOLUMES
Consideration is given to large numbers of pedestrians crossing the major
street during the four busiest hours of an average day.
Pedestrian Crossina Maior Street. Total durina 4 busiest traffic hours
Volumes: ~ 51-100 101-150 151-200 201-0VER
Points: Q 2 3 4 5
Maximum 5 points
,
Points
SCORE:
4. TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Points are dependent upon the magnitude of vehicular volumes entering the
intersection during the four busiest hours of an average day.
Traffic Counts (circle four highest hour voJumes):
Hour Ending At:
Dir 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 ~~ 1900 2000
NB 33 11 IQS 1~3 /58 15"C, l33 2,>/ :lll J.21 J.9o 3~S 265 ~rf 18)
. ,
SB ~I 15 11o~ 11-0 \<6Z ;233 ~57 .9.1;;' ;t~t ~qD 325 ;2.&'5" ;1./1 185 1311
EB
- ---
WB .3
(p I~ q ~/.j 18 30 :21- :l4 aT 30 ),1 5~ 3io ;;J.r
T
51-
15~ 313 :n1. 31.4
4-'51 '518 ~ 45
(1~
~\\ 53ft 4~g 348
@@)
4o"l 5;lo ~~t.
-2-
.
.
.
Traffic Volumes Warrant
,
Points shall be assigned in accordance with the following tables:
Total of Total of
Major Approach Legs Minor Approach Legs
4-hour Volume Points 4-hour Volume Points
o - 1000 0 o - 400 ,,:J,. CD
1001 - 1300 1 401 - 600 1
1301 - 1600 2 601 - 800 2
1601 - 1900 :Ul:\ 8 3 801 - 1000 3
1901 - 2200 CD 1001 - 1200 4
2201 - 2600 5 1201 - 1400 5
2601 - 2900 4 1401 - 1600 6
2901 - 3200 3 1601 - 1800 7
3201 - 3500 2 1801 - 2000 8
3501 - 3800 1 2001 - 2200 9
3801 - over 0 2201 - over 10
SCORE: A... Points SCORE: .0.. Points
Maximum 5 Minimum 10
5. TRAFFIC VOLUME DIFFERENCE
All-way stops operate best when the major and minor street approach
traffic volumes are nearly equal. Points shall be assigned in
accordance with the following table:
24-Hour Mi nor St. Aooroach Volumes fc50 )( 1/)0:" q. 4 d. tJ.
24-Hour Maior St. Aooroach Volumes X 100%. ~qoo Points
95 - 100 10
85 - 94 9
75 - 84 8
65 - 74 7
55 - 64 6
45 - 54 5
35 - 44 4
25 - 34 3
15 - 24 ~.41 fl. 2
5 - 14 1
o - 4 0
SCORE: \ Points
Maximum 10 Points
-3-
~
.
.
CALTRANS CRITERIA (Chaoter 4 CalTrans Traffic Manual)
Any of the following conditions may warrant a multi-way STOP sign installation:
1. Where traffic signals are warranted and urgently needed, the multiway stop ~~~
may be an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic ~
while arrangements are being made for the signal installation.
2. An accident problem, as indicated by five or more reported accidents
within a 12 month period of a type susceptible to correction by amultiway
stop installation. Such accidents include right- and left-turn collisions
as well as right-angle collisions.
3. Minimum traffic volumes
(a)
The total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all
approaches must average at least 500 vehicles per hour for any 8
hours of an average day, and
(b) The combined vehicular and pedestrian volume from the minor street or
highway must average at least 200 units per hour for the same 8
hours, with an average delay to minor street vehicular traffic of at
least 30 seconds per vehicle during the maximum hour, but
(c) When the 8S-percent 11 e approach speed of the major street traffi c
exceeds 40 miles per hour, the minimum vehicular volume warrant is 70
percent of the above requirements.
-4-
tolo
--
NO
-
,JeJ
-
NO
-
-
.
.
.'
ALL-WAY STOP SUMMARY
INTERSECTION.' 5R- f A
~d ".....,v~
~ 'D' .s+r.ee-t (fovt~) (
(JCO bloc-Ie") .
DATE INVESTIGATION WAS COMPLETED:
\ 5'60 -00)
TOTAL SCORE: \~ i
required to justify an all-way ~~opnt~onOtutl oif 3a P?ssible 54. The minimum
ro s 0 pOlnts.
INTERSECTION DIAGRAM:
LLJ
>
c( t;~'
IOObloc..k
"0" STREET
0 I
z
J 0 !
0
~
LLJ
en
RECOMMENDATIONS:
~ ~ -~ ~~ ~ ,
~ 6.e~ >'\C '\ ~\ \Ca.. ~
\0 C~~ \\v- ,(~t
~ ~",\€II..~-e..c..\;o..... ~c.~
D'f<.. ~(\/"", Ie 'fUi,(lr'VlJs .
REMARKS: jv1~ .aL~ v~ :t= ~ fi
j-itJ .J/-~;t ~. LgW
WPC 5546E
-5-
.
.
.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ALL-WAY STOP EVALUATION WORKSHEET
/..., -+-
Intersection ~t:to~\) {\"t:. I \) ~\h.e.A
(Major) (Minor)
File /580
Date t,-3o-~
Investigator ~.~
Qualifies for All-Way Stop based on 30 or more points:
Yes No){ Points \~
Qualifies for All-Way Stop based on other criteria:
If yes, explain:
Yes
No )(
Sketch of intersection with visibility data
On back Attached ~A6 6 5"'
1. Accident History Points Possible
From \t' / \ / CI,\ to ~ / ;l.~/qd-.
Accidents/year correctable by Stops x 2 points/aCCident
;).. 14
2. Unusual Conditions
4
3. Pedestrian Volume
Pedestrians <: ;>e/
crossing the major street during 4 hour count
4. Traffic Volumes (Peak 4 Hours)
Major approaches .;zYl~
Minor approaches fgJ
4
o
5. Traffic Volume Difference ".'12 ~
I
TOTAL Id- .
Minimum Points Required
WPC 5546E
-6-
10
5
5
10
10
54
30
.
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CHULA VISTA SAFETY COMMISSION
Thursday, July 9, 1992
7:05 p.m.
Council Chambers
Public Services Building
CAll TO ORDER
1. Roll Call:
Present:
Chair Thomas, Vice Chair Padilla, Commissioners Braden, Koester,
Chidester, Matacia
Excused Absence:
Commissioner Pitts
Also Present:
Harold Rosenberg, Traffic Engineer; Frank Rivera, Associate Traffic
Engineer; Shirley Buxton, Recording Secretary
2. Pledoe of Alleoiance/Silent Praver
3.
Ooenino Statement
Read by Chair Thomas
4. Aooroval of Minutes/Soecial Orders of the Dav
.
MSC (Thomas/Braden} to approve the Safety Commission Minutes of June 11, 1992 as presented.
Approved 6-0-1 with Commissioner Pitts absent.
Commissioner Braden was presented with her gavel mounted on plaque, recognizing her two years as
Chair of the Safety Commission.
MEETING AGENDA
5. REPORT Traffic Concerns for Second Avenue North of E Street
Frank Rivera presented staff's report.
Commissioner Chidester said there were several 25 mph speed limit signs that were posted on
EdgemerelNorth Second. He said there was only one sign now and asked what happened to all the
signs. He would like to recommend the speed limit be reduced on Second Avenue.
Frank Rivera said that the signs were advisory signs for the curves in the area and that staff has not
removed any signs.
Vice Chair Padilla asked staff why they gave the intersection of Second Avenue and C Street the
maximum 10 points for sight visibility and Second Avenue and D Street only given 2 points.
.
Frank Rivera explained that the intersection of Second Avenue and C Street is curved to the north and
there is a grade differential. At the intersection of Second Avenue and Shirley Street, there is a block
retaining wall and the roadway is narrow because of lack of street improvements. Both D Street
intersections are T-intersections.
~!l &. t\ fAlt~U"IS
UNOWf~\6%V;tlh' to
I
Safety Commission Minutes
July 9. 1992
Page 2
.....",
Gloria Attaway. 252 Sea Vale Street. Chula Vista. CA 91910 thanked the Commission and staff for
responding to their concerns for this area and conducting the safety report. The greatest concern was
the Second A venue and C Street area which is where the school bus stops for kindergarten and first
grade students. Ms. Attaway said she did not feel that the pedestrian count was accurate because
it was done the last week of school for Rosebank students. and during that week many parents were
driving their children to school. There are many children that use the intersection. She also felt the
speed survey did not accurately represent the speeds, saying that when people see the indicator trailer
(SMART unitl that motorists slow down. Ms. Attaway said that she understands that the Safe Route
to School Map is for use by parents to instruct their children on how to walk to school safely.
However, children do not follow this route and take shortcuts. Children cross Second Avenue and go
through a canyon to access Las Flores Drive as a shorter route to school.
Ms. Attaway said that the home on the northwest corner of Second Avenue and C Street is not at
street level and is elevated as is the retaining wall. This makes it more difficult to see oncoming
southbound traffic. She asked for clarification on the pedestrian warrant system.
Frank Rivera explained the warrant system.
Ms. Attaway said it is just more than pedestrians crossing Second Avenue, but that Second Avenue
and C Street is a blind intersection.
Vice Chair Padilla asked when the pedestrian counts were done.
"'"'"'
Mr. Rivera said the pedestrian counts were done on Monday afternoon, June 15 and Tuesday morning,
June 16, 1992 which was the last week of school.
Donald Stell. 210 Sea Vale Street, Chula Vista. CA 91910. said motorists on southbound Second
A venue from Sweetwater Road accelerate up the grade and since there is no traffic control measure
for a one mile stretch of road, traffic speeds on the street. He said a person was killed on the corner
of Second Avenue and Sea Vale Street and the motorist was driving in excess of 60 mph when he hit
a gentlemen on moped. He reported several other accidents along Second Avenue. He feels this area
is a dangerous situation and said a stop sign will stop most motorists. He said that even though the
intersection doesn't meet the necessary criteria, the Safety Commission could waive the point
requirement and asked the Commission to utilize this waiver and install the stop signs.
Chair Thomas said that the Suggested Route to School Maps were intended to help children take the
safest way to school. If a stop sign was installed at Second Avenue and C Street it would encourage
children to cross Second Avenue rather than to use the suggested route which is to cross at E Street.
MSC (Braden/Matacia) to approve staff's recommendation that the Safety Commission deny the
requests for an all-way stop at the intersections of Second Avenue and C Street and both intersections
of D Street. Approved 6-0- 1 with Commissioner Pitts absent. .
Vice Chair Padilla commented that he would like to see staff present all alternatives in their agenda
statements. He would like to see more than just telling a citizen that his request is denied.
Donald Stell, 210 Sea Vale Street. Chula Vista. CA 91910. wanted to amend the minutes to reflect
that the safe route to school was not their only concern. The children have friends on either side of
Second Avenue and must cross the street. From C Street to E Street it is one half mile and he asked
if the children are expected to walk a total of one mile to play with a friend who lives across the street.
He agreed with the Commission that some motorists will speed up between traffic control devices. but
felt that this number is a minority. Also, with a stop sign installed. the children trying to cross the
street can see if a car is stopped or not, rather than trying to guess the speed of an on-coming car.
~
U~~.~QEEJgAl M8NUTES
~
'e
e
.
Safety Commission Minutes
June 11, 1992
. Page 3
lrr~~O~fECGthl t(l\E~~UTEf-
.
felt that due to the strong opposition from the residents, it would be best at this time to take a "wait
and see" position.
..
Commissioner Mateeia recalled that the residents said shortcutting has always been a problem and a
safety issue because of the yolume of cars. He said that if the Commission did not address the safety
issue, then they were not doing their task.
Hal Rosenberg said that the perceived problem may not exist once the construction work is completed.
He asked the Commission to wait and give staff a chance to assess whether the students continue to
shortcut through the area. He felt the improvements would solve the problem.
Chair Braden asked how wide the median would be if installed.
,
Hal Rosenberg said it would be 24' wide and explained the dimensions necessary for a center land-
scaped median.
Commissioner Matacia said that he did not see any reason to change their voting on the temporary
median and asked if staff was going to recommend this to Council.
Mr. Rosenberg said he would forward the Safety Commission recommendation to the City Council.
MSUC IPadillalThomas) That the Safety Commission accepts staff's recommendation to deny the
Installation of a raised median on Telegraph Canyqn Road across Apache Drive until such time when
the construction on Telegraph Canyon Road Is completed and a traffic study of the area shows that
a significant Impact of vehicles shortcutting through Apache Driva affecting the safety of area residents
can only be mitigated by the Installation of a raised median.
8. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Gloria Attaway, 252 Sea Vale Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 addressed concerns of parents whose
children use the area of Second Avenue from E Street to Sweetwater Roed. Second Avenue is a major
thoroughfare, and it is not only neighborhood traffic. There are no signal lights, cross walks, or stop
signs between E and Sweetwater Road. She said the Chula Vista Police Department has done a good
job enforcing the area, but it is not enough to deter all motorists. There are approximately 15
kindergarten and first graders who wait on Second Avenue for the Rosebank school bus between D
and C Avenues. There are 20-25 elementary school children who walk the area to Rosebank. There
have been three accidents in the last six months, ona resulting In a death, one an injury to an
elementary school boy, and one resulting in property damage. She felt stop signs on Second Avenue
at both C and 0 Streets will provide the necessary traffic control measure for this "family populated
area. "
'.
Donald SteU, 210 Sea Vale Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910 repeated Ms. Attaway's recommendation
for the stop signs on Second Avenue on C and 0 Streets. He asked that e study be performed and
for this item to be placed on next agenda of the Safety Commission. Not only are there children in this
area, but elderly people walk along Second Avenue. He said it Is not safe to cross Second Avenue,
unless pedestrians go up to E Street and cross at the light. Children cross Second Avenue to play with
friends and it is unsafe for these children to cross. Mr. Stell stated he does not allow his children to
cross Second A venue. He pointed out that every letter street In Chula Vista that intersects with a
numeric street has a traffic control device.
Vice Chair Thomas asked Frank Rivera If he recalled this issue coming up before the Commission
approximately one year ago.
3
Safety Commission Minutes
June 11, 1992
Page 4
UNOfFECIA~L fiUNUTE,;. .~
Frank Rivera recalled that at that time, the Safety Commission tabled this item until SR-54 was
completed. He informed Mr. Stell and Ms. Attaway that this item will be on the agenda for July 9,
1992.
STAFF REPORTS
9. 1991-92 CIP Status Reoort - Distributed for Commissioner information.
10. Chula Vista Police Deoartment Traffic Summary for Aor" 1992 - Distributed for Commissioner
information.
11 . Status Reoort on Shell Oil Car Wash at Bonita Glen Drive - Distributed for Commissioner
information.
OTHER BUSINESS
12. Roberts Rules of Order
Frank Rivera distributed three Roberts Rules of Order booklets that he had purchased. There are six
more on order. The books were distributed to the new Chair Bob Thomas and Vice Chair Steve Padilla
and Ollie Braden.
~
13. Commissioner Comments None.
14. Commission Workshoo
Staff distributed another draft report in response to Council Referrals 1267 and 2557 regarding the
Role of the Safety Commission.
Vice Chair Thomas said that since he did not see any real difference in recommendations, he was ready
to recommend Option 1 which would require a charter amendment to make the Safety Commission
a decision making group.
MSC (Thomas/Pitts) to accept Option 1 and prepare a report to the City CouncU. Approved 6-1 with
Commissioner Chidester voting no.
ADJOURNMENT
MSUC (Koester/Metacia) to adJoum at 8:30 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
..........
SB:SAFmlO'11.2.MIN
011"2
~
'.
<.
~ ~
~.~'.
STIllE
""ATt..& r':TY
;
-,
,
. ~ ,. . I
~I . ....
"J-.-.--.-
" I
, i
I
I
~
w
,
.
w
>
.
"'T'"
,
-
,- ,
,
Q
.
.
tl
~I STMr ........
"I
1
I
1
1
..
..
.--
"
"'
.'
3'"
~-- .. ,..,~.o .: : ....
. .~ ~- .
. I .7 ," ~
I . ..... ... J
f -_. ."r-~. ..
I ...... -./""" : ;::': '~:=;
t .....;.7.".~..~:i..~;\
II ...-: ~ ~ t:--..;.... ~I
' , I . ~ !. ~ : ,f'
j . ~ , . '"i' .,
~I L"---Jr=::l
.l:~-jf~-jf~:~
, I, '.. '___.1 .-J
I!-'~-":r]
I ! l..___;\ : :: i if'~l
1 :U I~ ~:~ : ] .1' : .tS .
. f; .,~, -.. .:.J
'; ~~,==:=.~; ::0 bnfi~ Irrl~' lB,':
. -' ,.... ..... .' I . _. ......
. "--'~ ....-...... '-"". f > - ,-
. "0 ....r eo Ul '''r . "41 ....
: ; '. .~: ..:i': ; .:. :.:. :i. ! .1" il-. LJ'. I .
....... , ." "L'I '
.: ',' lj":' '. .: ..:.- .:.....:~____~
.
..
. "---.
.
.---
---J~ .o,,~..
-;' w
'..IE ',6..'
l:- ::-'-. ~:.,~I ,
-"'~ -_. i:1 - ftj.. .~ ~ ~'~~,' _,~.
\, I I .. t .:'1 ,_
'--." ~ -.....""'"\- - f
- .. l.i
-_......~~:.
. . . I
." .... ;.,-"
::.......:.-.-.... (,'''Ii
. t --' . . i'. ....,
. '. ~~
-
r'- . . . . .
I
\....
ORAWN .8T.
.....:._---------
MA
r I r.L.~ "'ARE.A
PL'AT
/'
6.'
. 0 A r f. . 6/29/92
"----
-" ."
"""\
GLOSSARY
ADT
Average Daily Traffic: Total volume of traffic over a 24
hour period.
Average Speed
All Vehicles
Sum of all the recorded speeds divided by the total
number of vehicles recorded.
Median Speec
Speed which 50% of the vehicle were above and 50% were
below.
85th
Percentile
Often referred to as critical speed, this speed,is the
speed 85% of the drivers travel at or below. This is the
speed used by the State of California to determine what
speed limit should be posted.
Mode Speed
The speed that was most often recorded during the survey.
CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL
STOPPING DISTANCE CHART
BRAKING DISTANCE
TOTAL
FEET
61.1
106
161.5
228
305.7
THINKING DISTANCE: - ClI~ta.,ce !I,)...eled o.f,.". brake~ ,)r. .:lpp:,r~ "'",,('
dlll/e, '~Ieacllng 10 danger.
BRAKING Dl~l ANCE dl!>!.nce tli...eled aftt'. brake!> havE' bee" JDpl':>d
In.) pan,c !>top ",'uaIIO'l.
.........,
~
.~/15 S::.l\Ccl bvs dvcp Ow
S/O "C" St. G2 :;;2.7P-M.
II
513:.D'JO
AVENLE
A
.(Cti.li..~hool b-s. p;~ \..If'
~o "c" ':>\: ~ 8~ D2. ~t.
C 9rI'l<= -8 ~ r
G
i
I{(W~-25)
W1
w81 ..
II
c
J- ~sicb.a\~
,
PEDESTRIAN COUNTS
DATE: (jy 15-'12 LOCATION: Sa:.DND AY~. + C ~EEI
A A B B C C D D
ME School ag. Adu. aga School aga Adu. age School aga Adu. ag. School aga Adu. age
0' 9' \ 0 s6 I . /
2:45 - :':00 ~ , I
I
.j 3co-~:lS 0 fZ) e 0 % ~ / /
'; 0 0 1\ 9" <? / /
". 3',1'5- 3' 30 '0
~
s fL1 I 1*111 \ 0 0 / /
330-3:45
TOTAL 0 I 6 4 0 0 "/ /
REMARKS' / I
I
TIME 1/ .
~ 7:45-8:0: JZ) ~ , 1/ )ZJ ~
.... ~
~ SW-b'.15 I J2f /I I 0
~ e,'.15-6;~ .
Y'5 ~ t?: II fP fO
TOTAL I 0 -::, . 5 0 0
!f
:
LOCATE AND MARl NITH
A COLORED 'ENCIL YOUR
RESIDENCE ON THl MA'
SlLECT AND MARl A ROUTl
TO THl SCHOOL NITH THl
~ST TRAFFIC CONTROL
DlYIClS (SIGNAL' AND
CROSSIHG GUARDS). TRY
TO SlLlCT TNOSl STRllTS
WITH SIDlWALlS.
WALl THl ROUTE WITH YOUR
CHILD SO THAT HE OR SHE
IECOMlS FAHILIAR NITH
THE ROUTE. lH'HASIIE 'Hl
NElD FOR SAFE WALI'NG
HAIITS SUCH AS: LOOK
10TH WAYS .IFORt CRDSSING
A STRElTl CROSS AT 'NTlR-
SECTIONS ONLY; DO NOT WALK
OR RUN FROH A 'ARKlD CARl
ETC.
'"
:
or ..
T ROUSDA~ ORI vI -'
0 "
'"
..
0
i3'
%
~
"
i
C ST
ellf OF '"U~A viSTA
SEA YALE STREET
..
'"
"
Uo 1:'
~ ..
~, ~ CASSELMAN
'0
DUREE T
D'
"
-'
15
ALVActADO 51
Legend:"
· Safety Patrol
o Trallic Signal
r':\ Safety Patrol &
\!.I Traffic Signal
- Crosswalk
- Stop Sign
-+ R.Je.
ON...
Rosebank Elementary School
~
.
.
.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL WARRANTS
INTERSECTION <;:,tcs~\) t>.,-~ I 'C' ":::,\/U."'\
Major Street/Minor Street
Date: fI..2~ - q;l
Total Points \6
(~oY\O -00)
GENERAL:
A fully justified, properly installed all-way stop can effectively assign
right of way, reduce vehicle delay, and decrease accidents. Generally, an
all-way stop is reserved for the use at the intersection of two through
highways, and only as an interim traffic control measure prior to
signalization. Stop signs are not to be used for speed control.
The post i ng of an intersection for all-way stop control shoul d be based on
factual data. Warrants to be considered include:
1. Accident records
2. Unusual conditions
3. Traffic volumes
4. Traffic volume difference
5. Pedestrian volume
Points are assigned to each of these warrants. The total points possible are
54. The installation of an all-way stop control is justified with a minimum
of 30 points, unless anyone of the CalTrans criteria is met.
ALL-WAY STOP POINT SYSTEM CRITERIA:
1.
ACCIDENT WARRANT:
2.
Two points are assigned for each accident susceptible to correction by an
all-way stop control during one full year prior to the investigation date.
(,';/,/91 - S/3IJ'l;;>-'
Total number of accidents correctible by all-way stop: 0
Maximum 14 points tJo R.~~..J.J "-t.Li ~E..~ SCORE: a Points
....+ Tl.,;~ i,,+.v~ect,'O')')
UNUSUAL CONDITION WARRANT:
Where unusual conditions exist, such as a school, fire station,
playground, horizontal or vertical curves, etc., points are assigned on
the basis of engineering judgment. Unusual conditions shall be
considered only if within 500 feet of the subject intersection. In
res ident i al nei ghborhoods where there is a concentrati on of school age
children activities separated from the residential neighborhood by a
r
collector street and coupled with other conditions, the Citv Traffic
Enaineer may apply traffic engineering judgment and waive the 30-point
minimum point requirement to qualify the intersection for an all-way stop ~
control. "'
The 30-point minimum requirement miY be waived and an all-way stop miY be
installed only if less restrictive controls have not corrected a
documented problem,
All-way stops miY be justified based on projected volumes and accident
frequency when traffic signals are warranted and will be installed within
a specified period of time.
Maximum 10 points
SCORE:
10 Points
3. PEDESTRIAN VOLUMES
Consideration is given to large numbers of pedestrians crossing the major
street during the four busiest hours of an average day.
Pedestrian Crossina Maior Street. Total durina 4 busiest traffic hours
----..
Volumes: 09) 51-100 101-150 151-200 201-0VER
-~]1.j4
Points: LV 2
Maximum 5 points
3
4
5
SCORE:
Points
""""
4. TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Points are dependent upon the magnitude of vehicular volumes entering the
intersection during the four busiest hours of an average day.
Traffic Counts (circle four highest hour vo)umes):
Hour Ending At:
Dir 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 \300 1400 Gi~ ~ Q9(i80) 1900 2000
35 IC.~ 1,(, nl. 'lov I~~ ~c5 ~::u.. k~ ;t.S ~'4- n4 ?>lo :l3~ \~s . ,
NB II.: 3~_ ~'\ ''-\4 1\1 \C"5 ~oe \n ~ ~ ~I. J.4\ ~ I~'l- ~
-- - -' --1 lc6 \~'\ \'\'}. ;;1.<.\ il3 ~13 ;;lei 14'
~Ii~. ).I., (.1- \~~ I~C I-:)Cj 1,-\1..\ ;!o
~ (.~ '1\ 1'.).(; II:}. IlL.. 1~'6 \'\1 11..'1 \~I.\ :1:5c 11.3;1 Ole, .54 III
SB \~ -n.. \'S t \"::to IL.l !.."S'I I'iS ~\\ It1 :253 :l4~ ::n', ll.S I~E \~\
- - \"t(" .:;ll'i 2:ic ;15(.; ;(3(., ITI TII
f-\'vG. " t3 \}I. 1'-I5m \"3'6 ,'t,~ a,,\
..
EB
- - - _.
- -
WB ~~ ~q, 3tc 4& """"
5 ~ ~I ).t ~~ . JIg 31- 5,", 55 ill Iv
.,L l...L ~T 4r .3..L 34. R il. .31- ~ 3Z 5c 51 4:; ;24
~
p'Y<.' . 4 /0 ;;11./ 3l.i 31 .n 40 45 43 43 o3S' 5), 53 43 ;;-
T 4\ I:JC. ~81 339 3c1 '3ic 4;).9 ~S~ ~'\~ 434 S4~ 511 50 46 (). (1;l.. \0
-2- ~ ~ CD (.f,
lraffic Volumes Warrant
Points shall be assigned in accordance with the following tables:
. Total of Total of
Major Approach Legs Minor Approach Legs
4-hour Volume Points 4-hour Volume Points
o - 1000 0 o - 400 \'Lv c:p
1001 - 1300 1 401 - 600
1301 - 1600 2 601 - 800 2
1601 - 1900 ~ 801 - 1000 3
1901 - 2200 \C>,'Sc 1001 - 1200 4
2201 - 2600 1201 - 1400 5
2601 - 2900 4 1401 - 1600 6
2901 - 3200 3 1601 - 1800 7
3201 - 3500 2 1801 - 2000 8
3501 - 3800 1 2001 - 2200 9
3801 - over 0 2201 - over 10
SCORE: ~ Points SCORE: .Q.... Points
Maximum 5 Minimum 10
.
'fce
- ')
)04,.
5.
TRAFFIC VOLUME DIFFERENCE
All-way stops operate best when the major and minor street approach
traffic volumes are nearly equal. Points shall be assigned in
accordance with the following table:
24-Hour Minor St. Aooroach Volumes :5c8 VI'
-- -- -- X 100% -" "to
24-Hour Maior St. Aooroach Volumes - . - 5cl.\J
Points
95 - 100
85 - 94
75 - 84
65 - 74
55 - 64
45 - 54
35 - 44
25 - 34
15 - 24
5 - 14
o - 4
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
o
\
"
.
\C .0"':\ 'I.
SCORE:
Points
: Maximum 10 Points
.
-3-
1/
The total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all
approaches must average at least 500 vehicles per hour for any a t!D
hours of an average day, and
The combined vehicular and pedestrian volume from the minor street or
highway must average at least 200 units per hour for the same a /..)0
hours, with an average delay to minor street vehicular traffic of at ___
least 30 seconds per vehicle during the maximum hour, but
When the as-percentile approach speed of the major street traffic Nt'
exceeds 40 miles per hour, the minimum vehicular volume warrant is 70
percent of the above requirements.
CALTRANS CRITERIA (Chaater 4 CalTrans Traffic Manual)
Any of the following conditions may warrant a multi-way STOP sign installation:
1. Where traffic signals are warranted and urgently needed, the multiway stop
may be an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic
while arrangements are being made for the signal installation.
2. An accident problem, as indicated by five or more reported accidents
within a 12 month period of a type susceptible to correction by a multiway
stop installation. Such accidents include right- and left-turn collisions
as well as right-angle collisions.
3. Minimum traffic volumes
(a)
(b)
(c)
.;
-4-
,""",,
NO
-
;.JO
-
~
'.
l
\Y
"
ALL-WAY STOP SUMMARY
. INTERSECTION: ':>~c..;:,\..::,\) ,,-.:.~ ["C' ~\/e.(.t
( ~07}0 -00)
DATE INVESTIGATION WAS COMPLETED: (p. ~ 9 - q ~ /
/1'1_A.Jpy.fL
TOTAL SCORE: \6 points out of a possible 54. The minimum
required to justify an all-way stop control is 30 points.
INTERSECTION DIAGRAM: \
.C. STREET '..$
IV)
w I
~ I
----;
Q i
z
0
()
. w ---
III
~
--
~
0 ----..--
-0
Ol>' -
R-\ -
,
. 40'
-
.
RECOMMENDATIONS:
\)0 ,,~ ,'", 0..JJ oil - ~"a -s.\o ~ . \'t~c~'\ 'M-'--Z\
'R.... ~ a.~d Il'\.. ~\ Tv'o.V\s ~~i",.",J,
REMARKS:
e;. )TJ,voJlld ~\c>~
. \
~'~'" ~~ UJ-Q.
,... ~\..t..t 0.1. "t"
5\10:..\
.
WPC SS46E
-5-
~
'P-l! ~ w...~5)
W;)..
W8\
l---':- Side l.lo.l /(
/3
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ALL-WAY STOP EVALUATION WORKSHEET
"'""'"
Intersection ~C('(lU\) t\.1J€.! -e $\/ee-t
(Major) (Minor)
File ~OlJ 0
Date ~-J&-qJ.
Investigator MA.
Qualifies for All-Way Stop based on 30 or more points:
Yes No 'f... Poi nts \ &,
Qualifies for All-Way Stop based on other criteria:
If yes, explain:
Yes
No X
Sketch of intersection with visibility data
On back Attached ~,.~ .::::;
,
1. Accident History Points Possible
From & / I / q I to (; / d5 / 9:J.
Accidents/year correctable by Stops x 2 points/accident
cP 14
""""
. 2. Unusual Conditions
.
cvrv,'}"I1E:t'-lr
otI"?111'.5.s./ni? c;-f/..e.c.r....+
t7
fO et. J L~..)(..\/
, .J.
imr!."'(;ve.,~ r~
,
lIo/t/, of
c. sfre..e.T
-12- 10
3. Pedestrian Volume
Pedestrians <.:; ,J
crossing the major street during 4 hour count
5
4. Traffic Volumes (Peak 4 Hours)
Major approaches \ a, ~()
Mi nor approaches \'ii, l (,
4
o
5
10
5. Traffic Volume Difference 10, Cl.:i
10
TOTAL
Minimum Points Required
,6
54
30
""""
WPC 5546E
-6-
\\\
.
.
.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL WARRANTS
INTERSECTION ~~t.o~\) ^IJE I '~. ~\. IJJOf:TH)
Major Street/Minor Street
Date: 111,~'J-'1J
Total Points \ \
( \'5\ 'bo -00)
GENERAL:
A fully justified, properly installed all-way stop can effectively assign
right of way, reduce vehicle delay, and decrease accidents. Generally, an
a ll-way stop is reserved for the use at the intersect i on of two through
highways, and only as an interim traffic control measure prior to
signalization. Stop signs are not to be used for speed control.
The posting of an intersection for all-way stop control should be based on
factual data. Warrants to be considered include:
1. Accident records
2. Unusual conditions
3. Traffic volumes
4. Traffic volume difference
5. Pedestrian volume
Points are assigned to each of these warrants. The total points possible are
54. The installation of an all-way stop control is justified with a minimum
of 30 points, unless anyone of the CalTrans criteria is met.
ALL-WAY STOP POINT SYSTEM CRITERIA:
1. ACCIDENT WARRANT:
Two points are assigned for each accident susceptible to correction by an
all-way stop control during one full year prior to the investigation date.
Total number of accidents correctible by all-way stop: <t?
2.
Maximum 14 points NO R. ~1.';\.tJ o.(.,\~tS\
UNUSUAL CONDITION WARRANT:
4> Points
SCORE:
Where unusual conditions exist, such as a school, fire station,
playground, horizontal or vertical curves, etc., points are assigned on
the basis of engineering judgment. Unusual conditions shall be
considered only if within 500 feet of the subject intersection. In
residential neighborhoods where there is a concentration of school age
children activities separated from the residential neighborhood by a
/'
15
collector street and coupled with other conditions, the Citv Traffic
Enaineer may apply traffic engineering judgment and waive the 30-point
minimum point requirement to qualify the intersection for an all-way stop
control. .~
The 30-point minimum requirement mAY be waived and an all-way stop m!Y be
installed only if less restrictive controls have not corrected a
documented problem.
All-way stops m!Y be justified based on projected volumes and accident
frequency when traffic signals are warranted and will be installed within
a specified period of time.
Maximum 10 points
SCORE: ~ Points
3. PEDESTRIAN VOLUMES
Consideration is given to large numbers of pedestrians crossing the major
street during the four busiest hours of an average day.
Pedestrian Crossina Maior Street. Total durina 4 busiest traffic hours
Volumes: ~ 51-100 101-150 151-200 201-0VER
Points: ~ 2 3 4 5
Maximum 5 points
SCORE:
\
Points
~
4. TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Dir
Points are dependent upon the magnitude of vehicular volumes entering the
intersection during the four busiest hours of an average day.
Traffic Counts (circle four highest hour vo)umes):
Hour Ending At: .
0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 l200G 1400 15009891900 2000
33"t1 \"15 \'\~ \'S~ \'5b ~33 d.511 c;tll ~l ~'la ~5' ;J./;S J,J'r 185
. ,
NB
SB \7> "n IS1 no \1.\ \'5,\ \'15 a\\ \'i,;). ~53 14'\ .n, .11.3 ,~8 \4\
W.B
- - --
fB
"
56 1-1 10 (.c 11 (,8 11
10 '5'1 '11 1~ (.q (. g 4'1
'""'"
T
&/ aclt 4J.3 431 ~1C\ 3~~ 4% 5~"I 4(,4 S~3 c-.~I., Ct~3 5"1':\ ~,.1 3"1S
-2- (u.
\\0
e
e
Traffic Volumes Warrant
Points shall be assigned in accordance with the following tables:
Total of Total of
Major Approach Legs Minor Approach Legs
4-hour Volume Points 4-hour Volume Points
o - 1000 0 o - 400 JILl cp
1001 - 1300 1 401 - 600
1301 - 1600 2 601 - 800 2
1601 - 1900 ;llj~ cp 801 - 1000 3
1901 - 2200 1001 - 1200 4
2201 - 2600 1201 - 1400 5
2601 - 2900 4 1401 - 1600 6
2901 - 3200 3 1601 - 1800 7
3201 - 3500 2 1801 - 2000 8
. 3501 - 3800 1 2001 - 2200 9
3801 - over 0 2201 - over 10
SCORE: l:L Points SCORE: ~ Points
Maximum 5 Minimum 10
5. TRAFFIC VOLUME DIFFERENCE
All-way stops operate best when the major and minor street approach
traffic volumes are nearly equal. Points shall be assigned in
accordance with the following table:
24-Hour Minor St. Aooroach Volumes \\;;to 7-100: \\.0, \\0/"
24-Hour Maior St, ADDroach Volumes X 100% - ~qSc Points
95 - 100 10
85 - 94 9
75 - 84 8
65 - 74 7
55 - 64 6
45 - 54 5
35 - 44 4 "
,
25 - 34 \\.0, \\ tIc. 3
15 - 24 2
5 - 14 1
o - 4 0
SCORE: (2 Points
" Maximum 10 Points
e
-3-
11
tALTRANS CRITERIA (Chanter 4 Ca1Trans Traf(jc Manual)
Any of the following conditions may warrant a multi-way STOP sign installation: ~
1. Where traffic signals are warranted and urgently needed, the mu1tiway stop
may be an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic
while arrangements are being made for the signal installation.
2. An accident problem, as indicated by five or more reported accidents
within a 12 month period of a type susceptible to correction by a mu1tiway
stop installation. Such accidents include right- and left-turn collisions
as well as right-angle collisions.
3. Minimum traffic volumes
(a)
The total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all
approaches must average at least 500 vehicles per hour for any a
hours of an average day, and
(b) The combined vehicular and pedestrian volume from the minor street or
highway must average at least 200 units per hour for the same a
hours, with an average delay to minor street vehicular traffic of at
least 30 seconds per vehicle during the maximum hour, but
(c)
When the as-percent 11 e approach speed of the major street traffi c
exceeds 40 miles per hour, the minimum vehicular volume warrant is 70
percent of the above requirements.
,
-4-
\JC>
:.-
~c
-
t-lc
-
JJC
-
jJlJ
-
-""\
"
.
"""'\
t~
"
ALL-WAY STOP SUMMARY
. INTERSECTION: ~~c..o~\) ~~t..l "~'\ $\.
o QOO bJoel::-)
DATE INVESTIGATION WAS COMPLETED: It>- '?'l\- a.~
( I~JgD -00)
TOTAL SCORE: , I points out of a possible 54. The minimum
required to justify an all-way stop control 1s 30 points.
INTERSECTION DIAGRAM: N W
~
t ~/
~
56
:>
"0" STREET , ~ C
~
300 bloc-k "l-
. E,p, ~ Q
\J
R-\ C ..38'
- Z
0 t
0 #13
-- W
en
RECOMMENDATIONS:
\"c O't."'Q R.... ~\.\ - ~~ ~o~ J:- c\ o~ '^" "\ """d_"
{.., ~ 6'\.. ~'\I",,,,s ~~~r ( 1:. .
,
REMARKS:
.
WPC 5546E
-5-
/(
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ALL-WAY STOP EVALUATION WORKSHEET
"""\,
Intersection
~E~tJj) /ille, / "P" ~Tte.t.r
(
(Major) (Minor)
File 15l8cJ
Date &; ,),1- 9J.
Invest igator tn,l1,
Qualifies for All-Way Stop based on 30 or more points:
Yes No ')(.. Points ~
Qualifies for All-Way Stop based on other criteria:
If yes. explain:
Yes
No )(.
Sketch of intersection with visibility data
On back Attached ro..(f- <::
1. Accident History Points Possible
From u I \ I cu. to ~ I 'J. <:; I CfJ.
Accidents/year correctable by Stops x 2 points/accident
Q 14
''"'''\
2.
Unusual Conditions I
S,9/'+ dl'5+"'~"'~ -1-0 "q,rf./,
C,C~...u....i/'C.-t .. t-Jee -led h( _ +.e..e So ,
e<- I.,." " w<'~"t c ,,( b J,,,.,rL. '(~ +a j.~ t" ....-.1.
:I
4
10
3.
Pedestrian Volume
Pedestrians 4~
crossing the major street during 4 hour count
,
5
4. Traffic Volumes (Peak 4 Hours)
Major approaches ::J. \ '3. C\
Minor approaches ~\l~
4-
IJ
5
10
5.
Traffic Volume Difference
\\c.\\./"
,
:2
10
TOTAL , \
Minimum Points Required
54
30
"""'\
WPC 5546E
-6-
D
~
.
.
.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ALL-WAY STOP CONTROL WARRANTS
INTERSECTION
~H.o~~ ~~t, \" 1>" ~h~ (":>o~"')
Major Street/Minor Street
Date: (P-3t7-~~
Total Points \';).
( \S~O -00)
GENERAL:
A fully justified, properly installed all-way stop can effectively assign
right of way, reduce vehicle delay, and decrease accidents. Generally, an
all-way stop is reserved for the use at the intersection of two through
highways, and only as an interim traffic control measure prior to
signalization. Stop signs are not to be used for speed control.
The post i ng of an intersection for all-way stop control shoul d be based on
factual data. Warrants to be considered include:
1. Accident records
2. Unusual conditions
3. Traffic volumes
4. Traffic volume difference
5. Pedestrian volume
Points are assigned to each of these warrants. The total pOints possible are
54. The installation of an all-way stop control is justified with a minimum
of 30 points, unless anyone of the CalTrans criteria is met.
ALL-WAY STOP POINT SYSTEM CRITERIA:
1. ACCIDENT WARRANT:
Two points are assigned for each accident susceptible to correction by an
all-way stop control during one full year prior to the investigation date.
Total number of accidents correctible by all-way stop: \
Maximum 14 points
SCORE:
~ Points
2.
UNUSUAL CONDITION WARRANT:
Where unusual conditions exist, such as a school, fire station,
playground, horizontal or vertical curves, etc., points are assigned on
the basis of engineering judgment. Unusual conditions shall be
considered only if within 500 feet of the subject intersection. In
resident i al neighborhoods where there is a con cent rat i on of school age
children activities separated from the residential neighborhood by a
d-I
collector street and coupled with other conditions, the Citv Traffic
Enaineer may apply traffic engineering judgment and waive the 30-paint
minimum point requirement to qualify the intersection for an all-way stap
control. """'"
The 30-point minimum requirement IDlY be waived and an all-way stop IDlY be
installed only if less restrictive controls have not corrected a
documented problem.
All-way stops IDlY be justified based on projected volumes and accident
frequency when traffic signals are warranted and will be installed within
a specified period of time.
Maximum 10 points
SCORE: ~ Points
3. PEDESTRIAN VOLUMES
Consideration is given to large numbers of pedestrians crossing the major
street during the four busiest hours of an average day.
Pedestrian Crossina Maior Street. Total durina 4 busiest traffic hours
Volumes: ~ 51-100 101-150 151-200 201-0VER
Points: Q 2 3 4 5
Maximum 5 points
SCORE:
,
Points
........
4. TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Points are dependent upon the magnitude of vehicular volumes entering the
intersection during the four busiest hours of an average day.
Traffic Counts (circle four highest hour voJumes):
Hour Ending At:
Dir 0600 0700 0800 0900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 ~~ 1900 2000
NB 33 7-/ 1~5 1~3 158 15"~ 2.33 ~51 ;1I2. .:lJI J.9o 325 2&5 ~rr /8:)
,.
,
SB ~I 15 /1014 110 ,gz ;233 ~57 0.1;) ~~I ~1lJ 325 :l'5" ~/1 185 13ci
EB
- ---
- -
WB .3
~ I). q i.ll 18 30 :rr :24 '-1 30 ;1./ 514 3i. J.r
........
T
5?-
/5), 3=13 3=1:1. 3/.4
401- 5;l.ci 4~1.
-2-
1;'51 518 ~ 45
~~
~II 53ft I(~g 348
@(9)
;;-Y
e
.
.
Traffic Volumes Warrant
~
Points shall be assigned in accordance with the following tables:
Total of Total of
Major Approach Legs Minor Approach Legs
4-hour Volume Points 4-hour Volume Points
o - 1000 0 o - 400 \;~ CD)
1001 - 1300 1 401 - 600 1
1301 - 1600 2 601 - 800 2
1601 - 1900 "\1\8 3 801 - 1000 3
1901 - 2200 CD 1001 - 1200 4
2201 - 2600 5 1201 - 1400 5
2601 - 2900 4 1401 - 1600 6
2901 - 3200 3 1601 - 1800 7
3201 - 3500 2 1801 - 2000 8
3501 - 3800 1 2001 - 2200 9
3801 - over 0 2201 - over 10
SCORE: ~ Points SCORE: ..Q.. Points
Maximum 5 Minimum 10
5. TRAFFIC VOLUME DIFFERENCE
All-way stops operate best when the major and minor street approach
traffic volumes are nearly equal. Points shall be assigned in
accordance with the following table:
24-Hour Mi nor St. Aooroach Vol urnes ~5o X 100:' q -4 ~ 'J.
24-Hour Maior St. Aooroach Volumes X 100%. {p~OO Points
95 - 100 10
85 - 94 9
75 - 84 8
65 - 74 7
55 - 64 6
45 - 54 5
35 - 44 4
25 - 34 3
15 - 24 ~.41tJ. 2
5 - 14 1
o - 4 0
SCORE: \ Points
Maximum 10 Points
:;3
-3-
CAlTRANS CRITERIA rChaoter 4 CalTrans Traffic ~anual)
Any of the following conditions may warrant a multi-way STOP sign installation:
1. Where traffic signals are warranted and urgently needed, the multiway stop
may be an interim measure that can be installed quickly to control traffic
while arrangements are being made for the signal installation.
2. An accident problem, as indicated by five or more reported accidents
within a 12 month period of a type susceptible to correction by amultiway
stop installation. Such accidents include right- and left-turn collisions
as well as right-angle collisions.
3. Minimum traffic volumes
(a)
~
~
~o
--
The total vehicular volume entering the intersection from all
approaches must average at least 500 vehicles per hour for any a
hours of an average day, and
(b) The combined vehicular and pedestrian volume from the minor street or
highway must average at least 200 units per hour for the same a ',JO
hours, with an average delay to minor street vehicular traffic of at __
least 30 seconds per vehicle during the maximum hour, but
(c)
When the as-percentile approach speed of the major street traffic
exceeds 40 miles per hour, the minimum vehicular volume warrant is 70
percent of the above requirements.
-4-
NO
--
ND
-
~
"
~
t~
e
e
.
.
.
"
ALL-WAY STOP SUMMARY
5R-"9nd A"oU1v~
INTERSECTION:
~ '1)' 5+r.o!.d ~ovth) (
(JOO b/o..1e ") .
DATE INVESTIGATION WAS COMPLETED:
\s<g,O -00)
TOTAL SCORE: \~
required to justify an all-way ~~~pntcsontOutl oif 31 possible 54. The minimum
ro s 0 points.
':' c~ ~ '''fMt ~ .J1-~ ""~ ~ .
~ ,,,,\~<::.e.c.\;o,,,,, ~c~ ;.t 6.~V:. N:>'. ~\ 1\.J... t..5
O'l<.. c.c..D'/"", Ie 'fMirfMJs .
REMARKS: ;\A~ .aL.J v~ ;L:, ~ ;/0
f..tp ,JI- pJ;1 ...;0/. L.,..,
INTERSECTION DIAGRAM:
w
>
c:( ttd'
- R-\
j
o
z
o
o
w
(/)
I
I
,
"1
-;
i
RECOMMENDATIONS:
WPC 5S46E
-5-
IOObloc..k
STREET
I,
I
.
~
25
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ALL-WAY STOP EVALUATION WORKSHEET
~
t" -\ t
Intersection ~\:to~~ E\\lE.. ~ ~'Ju.;
(Major) (Minor)
File /580
Date t,- 30 -~
Investigator ~.~
Qualifies for All-Way Stop based on 30 or more points:
Yes No){ Points \d..
Qualifies for All-Way Stop based on other criteria:
If yes, explain:
Yes
No }(
Sketch of intersection with visibility data
On back Attached /,146 e S-
1. Accident History Points Possible
From ~ to ~ / .1~/ttd-
Accidents/year correctable by Stops x 2 points/accident
1 14
"""'"
2. Unusual Conditions
4 10
3. Pedestrian Volume
Pedestrians < SO
crossing the major street during 4 hour count
I
5
"
4. Traffic Volumes (Peak 4 Hours)
Major approaches :l. J '1&
Minor approaches 1.1~
5. Traffic Volume Difference 1.';2 ~
4
tJ
5
10
I
10
TOTAL I~ .
Minimum Points Required
54
30
""""
WPC 5546E
-6-
'J-\o
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item ~ J
Meeting Date 07I'2BfCn
ITEM TITLE:
Report: Disposition of Space in the Information and Referral Center at Memorial
Park
Director of Parks and Recreation~
Library Director ''e\., ~ S.
Community Development Rirector ~
City Manager.....) (" IP.-'Q ~\\
(4/5ths Vote: Yes _ No X)
Referral No. 2573
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
At the City Council meeting of March 17, 1992, staff presented a report regarding the issues involved in the
disposition of space at the Information and Referral Center. The March 17th Council report is attached for
reference. Subsequently, Council directed staff to return with a follow-up report after additional discussions
with the Library Board of Trustees, the Parks and Recreation Commission, the Downtown Business
Association (DBA), the Chamber of Commerce, and a representative of the Chula Vista Historical Society.
Council also requested that other alternative uses be considered for this building. This report discusses the
alternatives for usage of the Information and Referral Center.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION: That the Council support Alternative Use #1, whereby the Information
and Referral Center is utilized as a Historical Museum and office area for the Downtown Business
Association (DBA).
BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Parks and Recreation Commission previously met
on April 16, 1992 and discussed a staff report and recommendation. At the April meeting, the Commission
was concerned the Parks and Recreation Department staff would be adversely affected by the loss of staff
office space. To alleviate this concern, the report was presented a second time to the Commission on June
17, 1992, with additional alternatives for staff relocation. The Commission voted 5-2 (Commissioners
RolandlHelton voted no as their desire is to retain facility for Parks and Recreation staff offices) to
recommend that the eastern portion of the Information and Referral Center be utilized as a Historical
Museum, and the western portion by the DBA for the Town Manager.
The Library Board of Trustees met on April 22nd and, following discussion of the issues, voted unanimously
(5-0) to support a local history museum (Chula Vista Heritage Museum) at the Information and Referral
Center. The Board has visited other potential museum sites and recommends utilizing the Information and
Referral Center as an initial museum site. This recommendation coincides with the Chula Vista 2000
proposed plan for a permanent local history/genealogy museum in downtown Chula Vista. With the support
of the Chula Vista Historical Society and the Downtown Business Association, the Board believes the time
appears to be right for a successful private-public cooperative effort to establish a museum to preserve the
history of Chula Vista. In addition, there was a suggestion, by the Library Board of Trustees, for possible
future expansion of the Information and Referral Center, to expand the facility westward. On May 27, 1992,
(inr]
rJ./-!
Item J-l Page 2
Meeting Date 07 f}Bm
the Board voted to support the concept of the Chula Vista Historical Society guiding the local Historical
Museum, rather than establishment of a separate commission as previously suggested to Council.
DISCUSSION: Staff from Parks and Recreation and the Library have been working with affected
organizations in developing the potential uses for the City's Information and Referral Center on Third
Avenue. As the Council may recall, the social services that were offered at this site were moved earlier this
year to the Norman Park Center when the Department consolidated its senior and social service components.
Since that time, the vacant space has been utilized by Parks and Recreation staff and the Town Manager.
At the regular City Council meeting of June 16, 1992, Council considered a written communication from
Scott/Blair Properties stating their interest in offering the sale of their building at 311 "F' Street, as a
potential site for a City museum. The Council directed staff to consider this offer with other alternatives for
the sites for a historical museum. While the Library Board of Trustees did review the building at 311 "F'
Street as a viable potential site; because of financial constraints in the City budget, and the building's offered
price of $720,000, this offer by Scott/Blair Properties is not recommended by staff to be considered at this
time. When considering a final site for the museum in the years ahead; should the "F' Street building be
available, it will be re-analyzed by staff as a site alternative. Scott/Blair Properties has been notified that this
report is being considered by Council on July 28th.
ALTERNATIVE USES OF TIlE INFORMATION CENTER:
Per Council direction, alternative uses for this facility have been explored by staff. In each alternative, staff
recommends that the western portion of the facility be utilized by the Town Manager. The new Town
Manager is presentlv occupying the smaller room (formerly the office of the supervisor of the Information
and Referral Program). This space has external access, separate from the proposed museum space. Below
is a discussion of each alternative:
Alternative Use #1: Coordinate the development of the Historical Museum with the Town Manager and
the Downtown Business Association.
Staff recommends this alternative because of the community benefits that would be derived from such a
service, with minimal fISCal impact. In this alternative, the Chula Vista Historical Society, in coordination with
the Library and the DBA, would utilize the larger room on the east side of the building for a historical
museum. This program would be staffed by volunteers, recruited by the Library Volunteer Coordinator,
through the Historical Society and the Library volunteer group.
History Museum Requirements: The Library is requesting funds in the amount of $5,000 to acquire necessary
furnishings for the local history museum in the Information and Referral building. The funds would be used
to purchase display panels, exhibit cases, photo holders and a sign.
Chula Vista Historical Society Involvement. The Historical Society has offered to provide the following
services:
1. Serve as the volunteer Museum Project Manager.
[inr)
dl-,2
Item d- J, Page 3
Meeting Date 07 mm
2. Provide photographs and artifacts for display.
3. Recruit volunteers and museum supporters. The Historical Society membership list is 400+.
Staff recognizes that funding is not readily available to support a large museum with a full display of pictures
and artifacts. Therefore, the Chula Vista Historical Society has provided photographs and artifacts to start
a display; however, due to space constraints, these pictures will need to be rotated so the public can have full
access to the inventory at various periods of time.
Downtown Business Association (DBA) Involvement: The DBA has offered to provide the following
services:
1. Set up and stock a brochure display case for Chamber of Commerce and visitor information.
2. Furnish materials and labor to carpet and paint the entire Information and Referral Center.
3. Loan an "antique" display case and some furniture for the museum.
4. Provide limited on-site supervision of the Library volunteers. This would include overseeing the
museum display, the coordination of the museum hours, and the set-up of exhibits.
5. Split the cost of utilities for the building.
In summary, the benefits of Alternative # 1 entails the City's ability to start a historical museum at minimal
cost. In addition, the City and the DBA would be able to foster a cooperative relationship which benefits
the Third Avenue businesses.
Should this alternative be approved by the Council, staff anticipates the Historical Museum could be
operational and open to the public by October 1, 1992.
Alternative Use #2: Lease the Information and Referral Center.
One of the advantages of this alternative is the possibility of revenue which could be derived from leased
office space. The City presently leases office space in the EI Dorado building on 4th Avenue for $1.10 per
square foot. However, there is a downside to this alternative. In particular, the Community Development
Department has advised the Department that there is a variety of vacant office, store, and commercial space
available in the area. Additional office space, owned by the City, would be competitive with privately offered
space. Furthermore, there could be start-up costs, at City expense, to renovate the space to accommodate
a tenant(s). Finally, the approximately 500 square feet available would only accommodate smaller businesses,
which may limit the building's marketability.
(inr]
07/-J
Item .) I Page 4
Meeting Date 07 mfCn
Alternative Use #3: Convert the Information and Referral Center (front/east room) into a Visitor Center.
The City currently has a contract with The Kobey Corporation to operate a Visitor Center at the Bayfront
Trolley Station. Since the City/County owns the Visitor Center building, the City/County has responsibility
for maintenance, repairs and utility costs (approx. $5,000 per year). The contract with the operator of the
Visitor Center states that the City/County will receive revenue from a percentage of sales, should those sales
exceed $25,000 per year. The contract, which commenced in February of 1992, is for 3 years. The City does
not anticipate any revenue from the contract until at least 1993.
The main disadvantage of utilizing the Information and Referral Center as a Visitor Center, would be its
close proximity (within two miles) to the Chamber of Commerce and the Visitor Center at the Bayfront
Trolley Center. Competition could undermine sales and potential revenue to the City. The Chamber of
Commerce, when approached to operate a Visitor Center at the Information and Referral Center, has
declined involvement in such an operation, without a major subsidy from the City.
Staff believes that by having visitor information (brochures/literature) available at the Information and
Referral Center (under Alternative Use #1), the need for visitor information in the Town Center area would
be met.
Alternative Use #4: Status Quo - the Center would remain as office space for the Parks and Recreation
staff.
As discussed above, while the Department continues to maintain staff at the Center, staff believes this
accommodation can be changed to locate staff elsewhere. Staff considers the benefit to the City of having
a historical museum outweighs the benefit of maintaining the building as staff offices.
SUMMARY: While the Information and Referral Center is a valuable site to the City, and can be used for
a variety of City activities, there are constraints which have been addressed. Since there is viable interest by
the Library and the Historical Society in a museum, the facility can be used for the overall benefit of Chula
Vista residents. The Historical Society has performed an outstanding service in the collection of historical
artifacts and memorabilia. The staff recommendation presents an exceptional opportunity to start a museum
and share the history of Chula Vista.
FISCAL IMPACT: $5,000 is available in an existing account in the Redevelopment Agency (Town Center
I Project Account; 990-9901-5519), and has been previously appropriated for such a purpose. Presently, the
Parks and Recreation Department budget allocates the following operating costs to the building. Utilities
(gas, electricity, water) of $1,743 for FY 1992-93 and telephone charges of $720. Department staff
recommends the transfer ofthis budget to the Library in FY 1993-94.
Attachments:
March 17, 1992 Council Report
Parks and Recreation Commission Minutes
Library Board of Trustee Minutes
Schematic Drawings of Facility
[inr]
d /-'-/
Item J I Page 5
Meeting Date 071'2i3m
Estimated Start-up Costs
Slatwall Display
Panel Boards 4 x 140.00 560.00
Corner forms 4 x 34.00 136.00
End Caps 8 x 30.00 240.00
Riser Legs 4 x 256.00 1,024.00
Assembly/Labor 100.00
Display Cases 2 x 234.00 468.00
Photo Holders 100 x 10.00 1,000.00
Photo ID Holders 100 x 2.50 250.00
Slat sign 89.00
Lighting 200.00
Delivery 50.00
Tax 273.00
Sub-Total $4,390.00
Miscellaneous (Museum sign) 500.00
Total $4,890.00
[inrj
.;<;-5
.
.
.
'\
~ "2.. \
. ~
,
j
COUNCil.. AGENDA STATEMENT
Item O? ~
Meeting Date 03/17/92
;'r
ITEM TITLE:
~
,
Report: Disposition of Space at the Senior Information and Referral Center
at Memorial Park
SUBMU Hill BY:
Director of Parks and Recreatio~
Library Director Vl.. (, " ,
Director of Community Development .
REVIEWED BY:
City Manage(/
(4/5ths Vote: Ycs_No.20
Referral No. 2487
At the City Council meeting of October 22,1991, Council directed staff to provide a report on the
potential use of the Senior Information and Referral Center building located on Third Avenue in
Memorial Park.
Meetings have been conducted between affected City Departments and the Downtown Business
Association (DBA) to formulate a use arrangement which is acceptable to all parties.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council accept the report and approve the restructured
disposition of space at the Senior Information and Referral Center, whereby the building is shared
between the Library and the Downtown Business Association.
BOARDSICOMMlSSIONS RECOMMENDATION: The Library Board of Trustees feels that the
Senior Information and Referral Center can function as a short-term solution for a museum. The
Board took no formal action.
DISCUSSION:
As part of the Council approved comprehensive senior services program at Norman Park Center, the
Parks and Recreation Department has moved the Memorial Park offices of the Senior Information
and Referral Program to the new Senior Center.
There have been on-going discussions among the City departments as to the potential use of the 760
sq. ft. Memorial Park building. The Library has expressed an interest to use the building as a local
history museum. In addition, both the Parks and Recreation Department and the Community
Development Department have been approached by the Downtown Business Association with a
request for office space Cor the Town Manager.
A local history museum would be an exciting addition to the community. However, there are costs
and space constraints associated with incorporating a comprehensive historical museum at this
location. Since a large facility expansion is not financially Ceasible at this time, the Library discussed
(inrl
1
;').-/ j)-7
(
"
Ilem ). ;..
Meeting Dale 03/17/'n -,
;,]il
~ ,
starting with a small static photographic museum in the building. Exhibits could include photographs
about the history of Chula Vista, and volunteers would act as docents. The Library, in conjunction
with the President of the Chula Vista Historical Society, has reviewed the space limitations of the site
and, believe that a history museum in the larger room facing Third Avenue would be feasible. The
Society maintains that they could interest volunteers during limited afternoon hours. If the space
were shared with another entity, the Historical Society does not foresee being able to generate the
interest for volunteers to sit and oversee a display. '
The Library Board of Trustees took this issue under advisement at a regular meeting. On March 12,
1992, two members of the Board toured possible museum sites. The Board went to 311 "F' Street,
the Senior Information and Referral Center, and the Women's Club. The members who took the
tour reported back to the Library Board of Trustees on March 26 that they did not believe any site
was ideal for a permanent history museum at this time.
RECOMMENDATION DISCUSSION:
In light of the interest expressed by the Library and the DBA for the use of the Information and
Referral Center, staff recommends the building at Memorial Park be utilized in the following manner
(a schematic drawing is attached to depict the proposed usage arrangement):
,
,
1.
The Library would utilize the larger room on the east side of the building for a historical
museum, staffed by volunteers recruited by the Library Volunteer Coordinator through the
Library Volunteer Corp and Historical Society.
-,
2. The new Town Manager will utilize the smaller room on the west side of the building
(formerly the office of the supervisor of the Senior Information and Referral Program). This
space has external access, separate from the proposed museum space. The Downtown
Business Association President sees no problem with a joint use between the City and the
DBA Both the Parks and Recreation Department and the Community Development
Department conclude a coordinated type of venture would be of benefit to the City and the
Downtown Business Association.
History Museum Requirements:
The Library requests funds in the amount of S5.ooo to renovate and purchase materials to set up a
start-up history museum in the Senior Information and Referral building. The remodeling of space
is to include painting, minor repairs, installation of track lighting, construction of display panels and
a display case, and a desk chair and file cabinet to accommodate the volunteers. The Library
proposes to raise the money for the museum photographic exhibits through the Friends of the Chula
Vista Public Library and the Chula Vista Historical Society.
,
[inr)
2
-
All ;;1''6
.
.
.
.
Item ~
Meeting Date 03117/92
ti
DowntoWn Business Association Coooeration:
The Downtown Business Association (DBA) is pleased with the space at the I & R Center for the
Dew Town Manager. At the present time, they are unable to offer financial support for the operation
of the building. However, the DBA is interested in supplying support through brochure advertising
and marketing of the historical museum; and will be a CO-sponsor the Cultural Arts Festival in May
in the Town Center I area.
The Downtown Business Association has also stated they would take supervisory control of the
volunteers overseeing the museum display, the coordination of the museum hours, and the set-up of
the exhibits. However, the Library has a volunteer corps in place and is willing to assume control of
the museum management including coordination of the volunteers.
The Parks and Recreation Department, the Library, the Community Development Department, and
the Downtown Business Association all agree to the staff recommendation. It is the intent of the
departments to assess the situation over the next year. When the Town Manager has been
established and new programs for the Downtown Business Association are in place, a long-term plan
for future utilization of the building would be coordinated among these entities.
FISCAL IMPACT: S5,OOO in funds from the Redevelopment Agency Town Center I project, which
are available and appropriated for such a purpose. The City Manager has administrative authority
to transfer the funds from Town Center I to the Library budget. No Council action on appropriation
is required. .
Presently, the Parks and Recreation Department budget allocates the following operating costs to the
building. Utilities (gas, electricity, water) of S1,743 for FY 92/93 and telephone charges of S720.
Department staff recommends the transfer of this budget to the Library in FY92193.
Attachment - Drawing
[in,]
3
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
June 18, 1992
PAGE 2
-
5. ACTION TIEMS
Unfinished Business
NONE
New Business
a. I & R Center
Director Valenzuela outlined the four alternatives that have been proposed for the use of the
I & R Center Building, exploring the pros and cons of each alternative.
Motion to accept the Director's recommendation for the I & R Center Building.
Commissioner Helton does not feel that the museum should be under the purview of the
Library. It is her feeling that the Parks and Recreation Department should oversee the
museum.
Commissioner Hall said that it is his understanding that the Library is already deeply involved
with the museum, and have been so involved for several years.
-.
Commissioner Willett feels that everyone would be better served to have the museum under
the purview of the Library.
MSC WILLETIILIND 5-2 (RolandlHelton opposed because they think the building should
remain under P & R Department even if it is used for a museum.)
b. GMOC Recommendation
Tabled due to time constraints.
c. Meeting Location
The Commissioners discussed the advantages and disadvantages of meeting in sites other than
the Civic Center Complex.
Commissioner Carpenter would like see some flexibility maintained as far as when the offsite
meetings would occur, in order to allow the Commission to address specific needs that may
occur in any given area of the City.
Motion to accept Option #1 of the recommendation with the words "as appropriate" inserted.
MSUC HELTON/CARPENTER 7-0
-,
~ ;)1-/0
.
.
.
.
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
April 16, 1992
PAGE 2
Commissioner Roland commented that he is opposed to any use of S D G & E righht-of-way
land for parks of any type.
Chair HaIl expressed his concern that there had been a major pooVgym facility planned for
the area which is currently not planned. He feels that we should focus on recreational
facilities that can be developed with a minimum of land use.
Commissioner Sandoval-Fernandez suggested that this item be agendized as an action item
for next month's agenda thus giving the Commissioners more time to review the written
material that was distributed with the report.
c. Otav Vallev Re~ional Park Uodate
Item tabled until next month because the scheduled presenter, Gordon Howard, was not in
attendance.
S. ACTION ITEMS
Unfinished Business
NONE
New Business
a. American Golf Fee Increase
Deputy Director gave an overview of the written report on the golf course fee increase which
had been included in the Commission's information packets.
Chair Hall asked Bert Geisendorff of American Golf if he had encountered any opposition
to the proposed fee increase. Mr. Geisendorff stated that he was not aware of any.
Commissioner Roland stated that he was opposed to the restrictions placed on "9 hole"
golfers in 1990. In addition he does not feel that $8 is a fair price for an identification card.
However, he has no problem with the proposed nomesident fee structure.
Motion to approve the American Golf Fee increase as proposed.
MSC SANDOV AL-FERNANDEZ/LIND S-O
b. Information and Referral Buildinl!
.
Deputy Director Foncerrada reviewed the report that had been presented to the Commission
in the information packets and stated that staffs recommendation was to allow the library
and the town center manager to occupy the building.
~
J/- /1
PARKS AND RECREATION OOMMISSION
April 16, 1992
PAGE 3
_c
Commissioner Helton asked whether there was no longer a need for space to house
Recreation Division personnel.
Deputy Director Foncerrada replied that a need for space still exists.
Commissioner Helton expressed her strong opposition to allowing the hbrary to use a portion
of the building when it is needed by the Parks and Recreation Department to house
Recreation staff.
Commissioner Sandoval-Fernandez stated that it appears that Parks and Recreation staff were
being forced out of the building.
Motion that due to the current needs of parks and recreation staff, the front portion be given
to parks and recreation staff and back portion of building house the Town Manager.
MSC HELTON/ROLAND 5-0
c. Golf Course Restaurant and Bar Sublease
I
\
Deputy Director Foncerrada gave a history of the lease situation for the restaurant/bar
located at the Golf Course and outlined the currently proposed sublease. He stated that
staffs recommendation is to approve the sublease as presented.
.-,
Commissioner Roland stated that he doesn't understand the logic of why American Golf
wants to maintain control of the lease that they have and sublease rather than just letting the
lease go to someone else. He asked the representative from American Golf if they would be
making a profit from the sublease.
Mr. Bert Geisendorff of American Golf replied that no profit would be made. The reason
for using a sublease is that the restaurant lease is tied to the golf course lease in that the golf
course lease term was extended as a condition of the restaurant/bar lease.
Commissioner Roland stated that he did not like any connection between the golf course
lease and the restaurant lease.
Commissioner Hall asked if Prestige would be working with Joelen Enterprises to.build the
hotel
Deputy Director Foncerrada stated that he had no knowledge of any connection between the
two entities.
Commissioner Roland asked Mr. Geisendorff if American Golf anticipated a joint venture
with Joelen Enterprises.
Mr. Geisendorff stated that they did not
-
dJ /I:r
I.
LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES
- 3 -
APRIL 22, 1992
if Eastlake wanted a library in this area, they may be
willing to provide the funding.
vice Chair Alexander stated that he is an EastLake
resident and that there is nothing in the area for
students. In his opinion, a school library that was open
in the evening would be used. The EastLake Homeowners
Association letter could inform residents of the EastLake
High School-Public library.
Key staff members from the City's Planning Department,
the School District, and other resource people from the
school district will be invited to the Trustee's meeting
in May.
B.
Local History Museum at Senior Information and Referral
Center
.
Chair williams reported that he had drafted a letter to
the City Council requesting the formation of a history
commission.
Director Lane asked the Trustees for their recommendation
on the use of the building at 630 Third Avenue as a
historical museum based on a staff report distributed in
their packets. On March 17, 1992 the City Council
requested significant input from the Library Board and
other affected boards and/or commissions. The Parks and
Recreation Commission recommended retaining the building
as office space for Parks and Recreation staff Library
Director Lane reported.
Maureen Roeber, Information Librarian, reported that the
Chamber of Commerce, the Chula vista Historical Society
and the Downtown Business Association is in favor of
using this building as a historical museum. Jim Thomson
suggested that the Trustees look at the space more
broadly to see if they can think of alternative uses.
Chairman Williams stated that he would have liked to have
gotten the Parks and Recreation Commission's input on
this matter. Also, he felt that this issue infringed on
the time the Trustees could be spending on the Library.
Deputy city Manager Thomson stated that the operation of
a museum and the creation of a history commission would
require Library staff time to administer.
.
~ c2)-rJ
Attachment B
INFORMATION MEMORAN'DtlH
~
DATE: April 14, 1992
TO: The Library Board of Trustees
FROM: Rosemary Lane, Library Director ~
SUBJECT: Report: Chula Vista Heritage Museum at 630 Third Avenue
(Memorial Park)
At the City Council meeting of March 17, 1992, the Parks and
Recreation Department presented a report regarding the proposed
disposition of space at the senior Information and Referral Center.
The Council then directed staff to return to the Council with a
report on the use of the Senior Information and Referral Center
after consulting with affected city boards and/or commissions, the
Chamber of Commerce and the Downtown Business Association.
Meetings have been conducted with the Downtown Business Association
(DBA) and the Chula vista Historical Society. The Chamber of
Commerce declined to participate in these discussions.
PROPOSED LIBRARY BOARD RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL:
--..
Accept the report and support a Chula vista Heritage Museum at 630
Third Avenue
PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: (4/17/92 meeting)
DISCUSSION
In the March 17, 1992 Council report, the Departments of Parks and
Recreation and community Development, along with the Library, had
formulated a shared-use scenario for the 760 sq. ft. Memorial Park
building. The Chula Vista Historical Society and the Library have
expressed an interest in using the building as a local history
museum. In addition, both the Parks and Recreation Department and
the Community Development Department had been approached by the
Downtown Business Association with a request for office space for
the Town Manager. Subsequent to the city Counc.il meeting, the Town
Manager has taken office space in the building.
A local history museum would be an exciting addition to the
community. At the last Library Board meeting, 630 Third Avenue was
considered as a short-term solution for a museum site. However,
there are costs and space constraints associated with incorporating
a comprehensive historical museum at this location. Since a large
facility expansion is not financially feasible at this time, the
Historical Society and the Library agreed to start with a small ~
photographic museum in the building. Exhibits would include the
iJ.-' ~ '1-/
.
t.
.
Chula vista Heritage Museum
Page 2
Histor ical Society's photographs and arti facts concerning the
history of Chula vista. Volunteers would be recruited to staff the
facility and act as docents. The Library, in conjunction with the
President of the Chula Vista Historical Society and the Volunteer
Museum Project Manager has reviewed the space limitations of the
site and believe that a history museum in the larger room facing
Third Avenue would be feasible.
In light of the interest expressed by the Chula Vista Historical
Society and the DBA for the use of the Information and Referral
Center, Parks and Recreation staff recommend the building at
Memorial Park be utilized in the following manner (a schematic
drawing is attached to depict the proposed usage arrangement.)
While the Chamber cannot participate in any formal program, it is
anticipated Chamber brochures regarding Chula Vista could be
displayed at the Center. The recommended usage is:
1. The Historical Society/Library would utilize the larger room
on the east side of the building for a historical museum,
staffed by volunteers recruited by the Library Volunteer
Coordinator through the Library Volunteer Corp and Historical
Society. Parks and Recreation staff currently in place will
be moved to another location.
2.
The new Town Manager is utilizing the smaller room on the west
side of the building (formerly the office of the supervisor
of the Senior Information and Referral Program). This space
has external access, separate from the proposed museum space.
The Downtown Business Association President sees no problem
with a joint use between the city and the DBA. Both the Parks
and Recreation Department and the Community Development
Department conclude a coordinated type of venture would be of
benefit to the City and the Downtown Business Association.
The Library would provide administrative support only.
Historv Museum Reauirements and Issues:
The Downtown Business Association has offered to provide the
following services:
1. Set up and stock a brochure display case for Chamber and
visitor information (DBA would be willing to sell "Chula
vista" T-shirts and reproductions of historical photographs).
2. Furnish materials and labor to carpet and paint the entire
Information and Referral Center.
3.
The loan of an "antique" display case and some furniture for
the museum.
dtJ-/~
Chula vista Heritage Museum
Page 3
~
4. Provide on-site supervision of the Library volunteers
overseeing the museum display, the coordination of the museum
hours, and the set-up of exhibits.
5. The DBA is interested in supplying support to the Departments
through brochure advertising and marketing of the historical
museum; they co-sponsor the CUltural Arts Festival in May in
the Town Center I area.
According to Chris Salomone, Director of Community Development,
redevelopment funds in the amount of $5,000 are available to
convert the building to a museum. Display costs are as follows:
Slatwall "L" Display
Panels
Picture I.D. Holders
2.50 x 75
$1,744.00
250.00
702.00
750.00
187.50
89.00 -.,
200.00
50.00
262.00
$4,234.50
500.00
$4,734.50
436.00 x 4
Assembly/Labor
Exhibit Cases
234.00 x 3
Picture Holders
10.00 x 75
Slatsign
Lighting
Delivery
Tax
89.00 x 1
Sub-Total
Miscellaneous (Museum sign)
Total
wpdoc/.113/museum.113
-.,
~ JI//ft
.
.
~;
~~~
-:;-
...~~~
-- - ~--
~---
RECEIVED
'92 N'R 23 P3:27
CITY OF
CHUIA VISTA
CHULA VISTA PUBLIC LIBRARY
ell'( OF C~l~~~JS:V'
Cli'1' CLEr;l\ " \)r n..t
April 22, 1992
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Dear Mayor and council:
The Library Board of Trustees would like to recommend for your
consideration the formation of a Hi~tory Commission to spearhead
the work on a local history museum.
The Library Board of Trustees is involved in planning for the South
Chula Vista Library, the possible joint use of the EastLake High
School and work on other new regional libraries and would like to
concentrate its efforts on these issues.
It would seem appropriate that a separate History Commission work
on the issues arising from this w venture.
I
~ nCerelY'~
~r. Ronald Williams
Chairman
Library Board of Trustees
..., -
.7:
-,,-~
,
\.. ."'11; "_,,:>,m... ..
\' ,..", r.: t, I'" ,..,
. a:.... Ii 15 "';;,.'ili
J./' / '\
/ ".)<", -/, I L/ I
. - '/
.'. .
~ .
5~ .
/
~1{d'7~
~..~
.
COlti\A\Ut'~~CA TIO~~$
~'7...
~ )'J~17 v
.... ".
,
365 F STREET CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 919'0 (619) 691-5168
Christensen, Scott-Blair Properties
305 THIRD AVENUE CHULA VISTA. CA 91910 422-1700 535-34n
5~
'.
.
-
June 1, 1992
. i,: i ~ .:
-'-'.'--.' - :"..---.-......; ~ ': fl
t I ' ~ ,I
.,:, I
5 t.,.:
- "'L--.~-. ~___jl..)'I'
CI~: c,-~:-,,~:~~,f..:;-~S
t. t.
Mayor & City Council
City of Chula Vista
muLA VISTA, CA
Dear Mayor:
It has come to our attention that the City of Chula Vista, through the Historical Society, is
seeking a site for a City museum.
We believe that our building at 311 F Street would be a fantastic structure for that purpose.
Historically, this "art deco" building was the focal point of social activity in the post WWII years. It
was constructed in 1946 by the Dick Wilson family as an ice cream parlour and ice cream factory (which
served 12 other neighborhood stores). It was ~ place to hang out!
Thousands of children toured this factory, where they peered through glass windows (still in
place) into the ceramic tile-lined room to learn how ice cream was made. They were also rewarded with
fresh samples of the product.
Part of the building provided the initial office space where the Wilson Insurance Agency was
founded. San Diego Gas & Electric Co. and Chula Vista Sanitary Service, Rohr Industries, and Norman
Park Senior Center have all been successful tenants.
The Sln1C:ture is a 6,400 sq.fr. loft-type building, with large open areas, some spaces with IS ft -".
ceilings, and spans 50 ft wide (see attached floor plan). There are numerous smaller areas that would
lend themselves to storage, office space, work areas, and special exhibit rooms. It is completely air
conditioned, carpeted, and has plenty of electrical service. There are large bathrooms and display
windows facing F Street.
The location of this propeny is ideally suited for the City museum. It is within one block of the
library and other City buildings, and is in the hean of the business district.. Parking and public access is
outstanding with the new City parking lots recently added on the adjacent propenies. Its location also
makes it ideal for other City needs, including City Office expansion. The structure has recently been
surveyed; with minor modification there is potential to add additional office/display space on a second
level, should expansion be desired in the future.
Please; take some time to examine the attached spec. sheet, floor plan, and prospective financial
terms. When you consider the location, history, building configuration, and low price, we are confident
that this would be an ideal site to collect, view, and study Chula Vista's heritage. We are looking
forward to meeting with a Council committee and City staff to see if this answers your needs.
Kindest regards,
.~
Russ Christensen
rn....~ ~{RITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
Margaret Scott-Blair .1,_ !J /1 ~ iit(
(ljc.~'\'0 (" ') r- ~
~\~"~ . tJ;I-l(
~ ~~~~,~.,~~,
-
Christensen, Scott-Blair Properties
305 THIRD'AVENUE CHULA VISTA. CA 91910 422.1700 535-3477
.
Suggested Financial Arrangements
Sale:
Tenns of Sale:
Asking price for sale: $720,000
$450,000 down payment, owners to carry first trust deed on the balance,
typical terms of 9.00% fixed APR, 10-20 years (approx. $2,5oo/month).
Lease:
Long-term lease is also available.
1 Year Lease:
3 Year Lease:
$6,000 per month
$5,500 per month
.
New Chula Vista
Historical Museum
~ (311 F Street)
III
'6
c:
j
~
"E
:E
....
F Street
Park Plaza at the
Village
.
{}/- /~
~
~
~8
~~
~
o
....
<
i1
~
~
~i
Xw !!1
Ol:; lD
ell< S
~ i
:I: .
PARKING LOT
60'-0"
WORK. STORAGE, & EXHIBIT PREPARATION
(19 x 50. CEILING 15' HIGH)
~(Q]
LEADERS OF CHULA VISTA
PROMINENT CITIZENS. PAST AND
PRESENT
(10 x 12)
(12 x 22)
COMMERCIAL HISTORY
MANUFACTURING. COMMERCE, ROHR,
TYCE. RATNER. SHOPPING CENTERS.
DOWNTOWN. ETC.
(00 x OO. CEiliNG IS' HIGH)
.~
ilS
~
HANGING DISPLAYS
....
-'
~
WAll EXHIBITS
(10.12)
~
MEN'S ~ IQ]
ot]OO
~[b
WOMEN'S
WALL EXHIBITS
-.
WALL l'XHIBITS
~
in
~
w
::l
~
\.1
t
w
....
w
LIVE DISPLAyS
PLANTS. SMALL ANIMALS,
ARCHITl'CTURl' OFTHI'
CHULA VISTA AREA
(20 . SO). CEILING IS' HIGH)
BAYFRONT
DEVELOPMENT
.
01
:I:~
::>
...
MAIN EXHIBIT HALL
FLOOR DISPLAYS AND MOVABLE PANELS
(:30 x SO. CEILING 10' HIGH)
WALL EXHIBITS
----------,
WINDOW DISPLAY ,
ENTRANCE
Chula Vista Historical Museum
:311 F Street. Chula Vista. CA
WINDOW
100'-0"
-
OFFICE
(15 x
-
Christensen. Scott-Blair Properties
305 Third Avenue 422.1700
Chula Vista, CA 91910 535-3477
#I d-/-)O
.
LIBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES
- 4 -
MAY 27, 1992
Trustee Donovan indicated her concern about parking, and
said that she was not convinced that this endeavor was
advantageous to the Library.
vice Chair Alexander also expressed concern that library
patrons would see a full parking lot and decide not to
use the library. Trustee Donovan also stated that she
fel t that the parking lot was not large enough to support
this much activity and that there might not be enough
parking for library patrons. City Manager Goss stated
that the same thing could happen if the library was in
a shopping center.
Trustee Viesca indicated that he liked the idea, but was
concerned about visibility and parking.
Chairman Williams expressed his support of the concept
calling it a fiscally sound idea and indicated that one
of his primary goals was to get books into people 's
hands.
.
MS (Viesca/Williams, 2-2, Viesca and williams casting yes
votes, Donovan and Alexander casting no votes) That the
Library Board support the concept, as presented, for a
joint sChool/public library at EastLake High School.
B.
Local History Museum at Senior Information and Referral
Center
Deputy city Manager Thomson reported that although a
Council Information Item concerning a proposed history
museum at the Senior Information and Referral Center had
been jointly prepared by the Parks and Recreation and
Library Departments, city Administration had not yet
forwarded it to Council. The Parks and Recreation
Commission was now attempting to identify alternative
uses for the facility. Mr. Thomson also indicated that
the Board I s recommendation that a Local History
Commission be established had been referred back to
staff. He said that staff would probably not recommend
the formation of a new commission, but would instead
encourage that the members of the Chula vista Historical
Society form a Task Force.
MSUC (Viesca/Alexander)
Chula vista Historical
history museum instead
commission.
recommending that the present
society deal with the local
of establishing a separate
:.
~
02/- 2/
.
PARKWAY ATTACHMENT -.
--- ---
--- ---
II SENIOR INFORMATION
AND REFERRAL
I I BUILDING IN
MEMORIAL PARK
I I
II
UJ II .
c€) A .
::)11
~ II Y:-r 1 ~
?( II ~
~ II .Z
--.
- "'I,;
I II -
Museum
\-
II
II ~~ !
U\
Town Manager
II ',""
-
-'
II ~~ ~~
II -.
'" '"
III III
JP Jr-),)
l~
'~~'''''IIt./
I~\;,
I,: .
, ,
.00>>
"
"
. ~;-
(e
l
:... :'
.~-J.:
, ,
.;,
....-. .'
...,...:-....... .-.-
I
; I: I
t ;
; I
i~
.'
. t,
; &.:
cbt
I ~
;=..
"
. o~t
-. t
t- .
;~i
..
j
I .
I I
.
"
1 Jl
1]1
I i
.
.
. I
.~ L
.
! Iii
I
I
~.
.....;
s
'"!".L'
....
..
.'f~'
~ ...
:~. '..'
"
~
~
;
e
,
I
h
,
~'
Po
,-
"
','
"
-,
.,
...
,
...,.
"
" ,
'Q
o
;".r:~ '..
, l
. ""
. ',04
'C
I
i
council Agenda statement
Item:
,)~
Meeting Date: July 28, 1992
Item Title:
Report forwarding Recommendations for Charter
Amendments together with a proposed resolution
calling a general municipal election, requesting
Consolidation with the statewide general election,
and approving proposed ballot items for city
Charter changes to be submitted to the voters
Submitted by:
Charter Review Commission ~
Robert Campbell, Chairper~~~
4/sths Vote: ( ) Yes (X) No
At its meeting of February 25, 1992, the city Council determined to
place an item on the June, 1992 ballot relating to runoff elections
and determined to defer consideration of the other Charter Review
. Commission-recommended ballot items until some later date prior to
the November, 1992 ballot. The Commission re-presents two of those
prior recommendations (Sections 304 and 305) , three revised prior
recommendation (Sections 303, 602 and 1009), and three new
recommendations (Sections 300, 600, and 1009) for Council's
consideration for placement on the November, 1992 ballot.
Charter Review commission Recommendation:
1. Accept the Report and recommendations of the Charter Review
Commission to place Charter amendment measures on the November,
1992 ballot to: make a technical clean-up addition to Section 300
relating to runoff elections in the event of death of one of the
candidates; make two changes to Section 303 relating to Council
vacancies and the filling of vacancies; make a technical change to
the cost of living adjustment to the Mayor I s salary in Charter
Section 304; add a new provision to Section 305 prohibiting a gift
of public funds; add recognition of committees as well as
appointive boards and commission to section 600 , and giving
Council the power to authorize boards, commissions, and committees
to take final decision making authority as to such matters the
Council by ordinance provides, and establish exemptions for some
advisory bodies; change Section 602 regarding the initial term of
members of boards and commissions so that such terms of less than
two years do not count toward the two-term limit; and increase the
amounts in Section 1009 authorizing award by various processes for
letting of public works contracts, and add a City Attorney-
crcrpt1.wp
July 23, 1992
Report re Charter Changes
Page 1
cJ:;J- /
recommended new provision authorizing the city council to waive bid
defects.
2. Direct that
4, 1992 with a
consolidation,
propositions.
the City Attorney return at the meeting of August
Resolution calling the election, requesting its
including the proposed Charter change ballot
Safety Commission Recommendation:
Place the proposed change to Charter section 600 on the November
ballot. If approved by the voters, it will give Council the
authority to delegate some final-decision making authority to the
Safety Commission, if desired.
city Attorney Recommendation:
The city Attorney has reviewed the recommendation of the Charter
Review commission and recognizes that they have undergone a
difficult task and have done an excellent job in attempting to
address some of the changes the Council has requested with the
Charter. Except as noted below, the City Attorney approves the
recommendations of the Charter Review commission:
1. Proposed section 303, Number of consecutive absences
triggering a vacancy:
The Charter Review Committee proposes to make three continuous
unexcused absences or 10 unexcused absences in a 12 month period an
event of vacancy of Office. This is a substantial improvement in
a provision that would have essentially allowed 36 out of a total
of 48 possible vacancies in a 12 month period. It eliminates the
haphazard elimination from elected office that existed before, and
focus on true deriliction of office. The CRC has asked the Council
to consider as their primary recommendation that three continuous
unexcused absences should trigger a vacancy, but has recommended in
the alternative, four continuous unexcused absences. In order to
get away from the haphazard elimination of office, I would urge the
Council to chose the alternative option: four unexcused absences.
2. Proposed section 305, Gift of Public Funds Language:
The CRC proposes to add, at section 305, language prohibiting
the City from giving the credit of the City, pledging the credit of
the City, or making a gift of public funds except for granting aid
to the poor. The City Attorney recommends against submission of
this matter to the voters at least at this time because of the
ambiguity in the words, and the lack of precise guidelines for
their application.
crcrpt1.wp
July 23, 1992
Report re Charter Changes
Page 2
,}J-;2
Because this is a repetition of a broadly worded state
constitutional provision, there is an unexpressed presumption that
all of the various cases interpreting such a provision would be
applicable, but we have no examples of how the language is applied,
nor of the consequences of its violation. However, we know that
substantial litigation expenses have been incurred to arrive at a
more precise meaning.
situations which come to mind include: When we use the credit
of the City for the advantage of SDG&E or Gold Coast Engineering on
industrial development bonds, are we giving the credit of the City?
What if we assure that Nickelodeon will repay its lease debt to
Homart, are we pledging the credit of the City for the payment of
a liability of Nickelodeon? If we send flowers to the funeral of
a deceased councilperson, is it a gift that is proscribed? Every
transaction that the City may engage in the future may be poten-
tially subject to attack on the grounds that the value received is
deficient for the value given, and may be attacked as a gift.
What are the consequences of violating the section? The pro-
posed change does not address it. Is it loss of office? Is it
repayment by the Councilmembers?
If we are to proscribe activity of the City Council, it should
be done specifically and without ambiguity so that the Council and
the public knows the rules aforehand. In my opinion, there are
adequate other political controls to prevent abuse.
The City Attorney recommends that the structure of Section 303
be referred to the Charter Review commission for the purposes
specified in Footnote 1 in the attached proposed resolution.
Discussion:
Charter Section 300. Member. Eliaibilitv and Terms.
This is a new, ci ty Attorney recommended and Charter Review
commission approved proposed amendment to recently amended Section
300 relating to runoff elections. The electorate approved the
Council recommended ballot item in June moving the election for
Mayor and Councilmembers from November to June and creating a
possible runoff election in November in the event no candidate
receives a majority of the votes cast for the particular seat.
Because of the complexity of the changes, it was determined not to
deal with the eventuality of a runoff candidate's death at that
time.
This proposal adds a new subsection H to deal with the situation
where one of the two potential runoff candidates dies prior to the
special runoff election. If the death occurs prior to the ballot
crcrpt1.wp
July 23, 1992
Report re Charter Changes
Page 3
rJ~..-3
printing cutoff date (approximately 90 days preceding the November
election), then the candidate receiving the third highest number of
votes in the June election for the particular seat would be
notified by the City Clerk of the opportunity to accept or reject
being placed on the November ballot and participate in the runoff
election against the other remaining candidate. They would have
five calendar days to accept or reject the opportunity. If the
offer is accepted, their name would be placed on the ballot and a
runoff election would proceed. If the offer is rejected, the
remaining candidate would be deemed elected by operation of law as
of the date of the death and no runoff election would occur.
If the death occurred after the ballot printing cutoff date, the
name of the deceased candidate would have to remain on the ballot
and the election proceed. The general law would control the
outcome of the election. If the deceased candidate wins, the
office would be declared vacant and a special election required.
Charter section 303.
Vacancies.
In our February 25, 1992 report to Council, the Charter Review
commission recommended two changes to section 303. Both
recommendations are modified in this report, as a result of further
consideration. The Commission presents two options regarding the
creation of a vacancy upon absence, in addition to the
recommendation regarding the process by which the vacancy is
filled.
The first change relates to the vacancy by operation of law if a
member of Council is absent from all regular meetings of the
Council for a period of thirty days consecutively from and after
the last regular City Council meeting attended by such member,
unless by permission of the Council expressed in its minutes. The
February 25, 1992 proposed amendment would have such a vacancy
occur when a Councilmember is absent from three consecutive regular
meetings of the Council actuallv scheduled and held, unless with
permission of the Council expressed in its minutes at the same
meetina in which the absence occurs.
At the Charter Review commission's meeting of June 4, 1992, the
City Attorney informed the Charter Review Commission for the first
time that the Council's concern with the section in its current
form was that at the last meeting from which the Councilmember
might have an unexcused absence, the Councilmember would be at the
political whim of the other members of Council to grant that
permission for an excused absence, or suffer vacancy of his or her
seat by operation of law; and that Councilman Rindone was concerned
about non-attendance overall being the proper focus of the section.
The proposed amendment would not cure those problems.
crcrpt1.wp
July 23, 1992
Report re Charter Changes
Page 4
02.)-'1
In response to the city Attorney's information, the Commission's
proposed amendment to the second paragraph of section 303 retains
the prior recommendation establishing a vacancy by operation of law
upon the absence from three consecutive regular meetings scheduled
and held without permission of Council expressed in its minutes
contemporaneously with the absences, and adds a provision creating
a vacancy by operation of law if a Councilperson misses ten regular
meetings scheduled and held within a twelve-month period (whether
or not consecutively) wi thout such excuse. Finally, the new
recommendation also adds a provision reauirinq the Council to grant
a requested excuse if the absence was caused by a temporary illness
disabling the Councilperson from attendance.
In response to the City Attorney's request, at the Commission's
July 21 meeting we agreed to also recommend an alternative
provision requiring four consecutive unexcused absences before
vacancy. However, our preference is the 3/10, not the 4/10
provision. We do not recommend to you the ci ty Attorney's
requested third option, absence from a total of ten meetings in a
year, but dropping the three (or four) consecutive meetings
provision. Nor do we recommend deletion of the requirement for
Council approval of the absences. There has never been an
historical occasion when an excused absence was denied for other
than proper grounds.
The second amendment to section 303 relates to the method by which
such a vacancy is filled. The Charter currently provides that the
Council must declare the existence of the vacancy and fill it by
appointment within thirty days after that declaration of the
vacancy. If Council is unable to do so, Council is required by the
Charter to call a special election to fill the vacancy.
The proposed amendment to the third paragraph of section 303 would
put a time limit on when the Council is required to declare the
vacancy, by requiring it to be "as soon as practicable". The
proposed amendment then places a duty on the Council to use its
best efforts in good faith to fill the vacancy by appointment
within thirty days of that declaration. The proposed amendment
further provides that where impasse on selection is reached sooner
than the thirty days, the Council shall call the election sooner.
These changes are necessary to avoid the delay which the Charter
allowed to occur when the former mayor died.
Charter section 304. presidina Officer. Mayor.
There is no change to the recommendation made in the February 25
report. This is a technical cleanup amendment to Subsection (c) of
Charter section 304 relating to the cost of living increase to the
Mayor's salary, with no substantive change. The current provision
crcrpt1.wp
July 23, 1992
Report re Charter Changes
Page 5
,J).-.s-
provides for an annual increase in the Mayor's salary "in an amount
not to exceed the "All Urban Consumer/All Items Component of the
San Diego Metropolitan Area U Broader Base Consumer Price Index".
The proposed change would clarify that by having it read "in an
amount not to exceed the proportionate qrowth in the All Urban
Consumers/All Items Component of the San Diego Metropolitan Area U
(Broader Base) Consumer Price Index since the date of the last
adiustment".
Charter section 305. Prohibited Acts.
There is no change from the February 25, 1992 report
recommendation. The proposed amendment makes two changes to
section 305. The first adds an entirely new paragraph prohibiting
the Council from making a gift of public funds. The language
parallels that in the State Constitution applicable to General Law
cities. The Commission felt it was necessary because the State
constitutional provision does not apply to Charter cities, and such
a provision is just a matter of good government. The Assistant
city Attorney advises that the case law interpreting the identical
state constitution provision would be used to interpret this new
city Charter provision. Generally, that case law concludes that
the expenditure of public money which incidentally benefits a
private party, but is primarily for a "public purpose" is lawful.
The courts have been reasonably liberal in finding a "public
purpose" when an expenditure is challenged. The second amendment
makes the reference to "councilmen" in the existing second
paragraph (new third paragraph) of section 305 gender neutral, by
changing the term to "councilmembers". This usage was apparently
missed by the former City Clerk in language cleanup amendments
authorized by the voters in 1978.
Charter section 600.
In General.
This is a new recommendation not previously forwarded to Council in
the February 25 report. The existing Charter creates, and
establishes the powers of the Planning commission (Section 605),
the Board of Library Trustees (Section 607), the civil Service
commission (Section 609), and the Parks and Recreation Commission
(Section 611). Existing section 600 provides that those boards and
commissions have the powers and duties set forth in the Charter and
gives the Council authority to create by ordinance such boards and
commissions it feels are required. The existing section also
authorizes the Council by ordinance to grant to them such powers
and duties as are consistent with the Charter. The boards and
commissions are to consult with and advise the Mayor, Councilor
City Manager as provided in the Charter or in the ordinances
establishing such boards or commissions but they shall have no
authority to direct the conduct of any department.
crcrptl. wp
July 23, 1992
Report re Charter Changes
Page 6
c2:2-~
Charter section 606 gives the City Council authority to delegate to
the Planning commission for final action functions with respect to
land use, subdivisions, planning and zoning. Charter section 610
authorizes the civil service commission to hear appeals of
classified employees from suspension, demotions or dismissals.
However, other than these two exceptions, the Charter does not
contain clear authority for Council to delegate Council's final
decision making authority to those appointive boards and
commissions, whether created by Charter or ordinance, if desired.
If approved by the voters, and Council delegates its final
decision-making authority to an appointive body by ordinance such
body would still be bound by the last phrase in Charter section 600
prohibiting their directing the conduct of a department.
Implementation of their decision would not constitute direction of
a department's conduct. This provision is intended to accommodate
council's delegation of its own quasi-judicial and legislative
functions, not to usurp the City Manager and Department Heads'
administrati ve control established in Articles IV and V of the
Charter.
The proposed amendments would amend the title of Article VI and
section 600 to:
a. Give the city Council the authority by ordinance to give
Charter-created boards and commissions powers and duties
in addition to those set forth in the Charter;
b. Allow the City Council to create and give powers and
duties to committees by ordinance, in addition to their
existing power to create and give powers and duties to
boards and commissions by ordinance;
c. Authorize the City Council by ordinance to give duties to
Charter-created boards and commissions, in addition to
their duty and power to "consult with and advise the
Mayor, Councilor City Manager";
d. Require the ordinance to contain a "sunset" provision
whereby the Council determines a date after which the
advisory body will cease to exist, unless expressly
extended by Council by ordinance.
e. Authorize, but not require, the Council, through its
exercise of ordinance power, to give otherwise advisory
boards, committees or commissions final decision-making
authority otherwise within the authority of the council,
if the Council so chooses;
f. Add an express exemption from specified Charter
requirements otherwise applicable to appointive boards,
crcrpt1.wp
July 23, 1992
Report re Charter Changes
Page 7
d.2 - ?
committees and commissions, for special purpose advisory
committees of an anticipated term of six months or less,
and completely exempt advisory groups, such as the
Interagency Water Task Force, composed primarily of
elected or appointed officials of governmental entities.
The proposal will give authority for Council to delegate to boards,
committees and commissions final decision-making authority with
regard to certain administrative items the Council would rather not
hear. Examples would include the Director of Public Works and
Safety Commission proposal to delegate to the Safety Commission
some of the powers with regard to traffic matters otherwise
required to be exercised by the city Council. Additionally,
existing ordinances already delegate final decision-making
authority to the Board of Appeals and Advisors and the Mobilehome
Rent Review Commission. The proposed amendment would regularize
those ordinance provisions, and provide clear Charter authority for
the practice. As the City grows, it may be even more desirable in
future years to relieve the City Council of other administrative
hearing, or other, burdens, through delegation by ordinance. The
proposed language will accomplish that goal.
section 602. Appointments: Term and Vacancies.
There is no substantive change to the proposal forwarded by the
Commission in its February 25, 1992 report. The Commission
recommends revision of subdivision (al of Charter section 602 to
give initial term appointee the same privilege as expired term
appointees to City boards and commission. The existing Charter
provision gives members of boards and commissions a maximum of two
consecutive four year terms, but provides that appointment to fill
an unexpired term of less than two years does not count as a term.
The proposed amendment makes appointment to fill an initial term of
less than two vears not count as a term for the purposes of the two
term limit, in the same manner. This situation occurs when new
boards or commissions are created and persons must choose by lot
terms of one, two, three or four years, so that once the commission
is established, the terms of members are staggered so as to ensure
continuity in the work of the commission.
section 1009. Contracts on Public Works.
This proposal revises the proposal forwarded to the City Council on
February 25, 1992 by adding a city Attorney recommended provision
authorizing the city Council to waive defects in public works
contract bids, and by adding a grammatical correction.
Under the existing Charter provision, public works contracts are
let by the City Council following a competitive bidding process
after advertising for bids, if the amount is in excess of $25,000.
crcrpt1.wp
July 23, 1992
Report re Charter Changes
Page 8
;2~ -g"
The proposed amendment would increase the amount to $50,000.
Under the existing Charter, public works contracts for more than
$10,000 but less than $25,000 may be let by the City Council
without advertising for bids, if the city Manager or his designee
has secured competitive prices. The proposed amendment would
increase those amounts from $10,000 to $25,000, and $25,000 to
$50,000, respectively.
Under the existing Charter, for public works projects for less than
$10,000, the City Manager may award such a contract without
advertising for bids, as long as the City Engineer or the
Purchasing Agent has obtained informal bids. The proposed
amendment would increase that amount to $25,000.
The Commission feels there are sufficient checks and balances in
the public works procurement process to ensure fair dealing with
regard to public works contracts let by either the Purchasing Agent
or the city Manager pursuant to Charter power. In the interest of
efficiency in making such awards for smaller amounts in light of
today's values, the Commission feels the threshold for full
competitive bidding based upon advertisement for bids should only
occur with regard to contracts where the amount anticipated is in
excess of $50,000. The City Manager and/or the Purchasing Agent
should be allowed to award public works contracts for $25,000 or
less, based on an informal contracting process, and those in excess
of $25,000 but less than $50,000 should be competitively negotiated
by the City Manager, subject to Council approval.
The new, city Attorney proposed, change to section 1009 adds a
sentence to the next to last paragraph. The existing Charter
authorizes Council to reject any and all bids in its discretion.
The new proposal gives Council additional authority to waive any
defects in bids, if it finds in a public hearing that such waiver
is to the public's benefit. Arguably, under existing law the
Council could only waive immaterial defects--this change would
expand that power of the Council.
FISCAL IMPACT:
None of the proposed Charter amendments would have significant
fiscal impacts. The proposed amendment to Charter section 600
potentially authorizing delegation of power to otherwise advisory
boards, committees, and commissions could result in increased staff
costs to staff them, but decreased costs because such matters would
not have to come before Council. The proposed dollar amount
changes with regard to public works contracts in Charter section
1009 will result in some contracts which previously would have had
to have been approved by Council being approved by the City Manager
and/or the Purchasing Agent, at lesser administrative expense. The
crcrpt1.wp
July 23, 1992
Report re Charter Changes
Page 9
;;~-CJ
proposed waiver authority in section 1009 could result in the award
of public works contracts at amounts less than otherwise required
without such waiver authority, potentially resulting in City
savings.
C:\a113\crcnov
crcrpt1.wp
July 23, 1992
Report re Charter Changes
Page 10
,}.)-/O
RESOLUTION FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF A GENERAL
MUNICIPAL ELECTION AND REQUESTING THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO CONSOLIDATE THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL
ELECTION WITH THE STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD
ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 3, 1992, FOR THE PURPOSE OF ELECTION
OF TWO MEMBERS OF CITY COUNCIL AND CHARTER AMENDMENTS,
AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS THEREFOR
WHEREAS, under the provisions of the Chula vista Charter, a
General Municipal Election shall be held on November 3, 1992 for
the purpose of electing councilmembers to seats 3 and 4 for the
City Council and Charter Amendments ; and,
WHEREAS, it is desirable that the General Municipal Election
be consolidated with the statewide General Election to be held on
the same date and conducted in all respects as if there were only
one election within the city with the same precincts, polling
places, and election officers, and that the San Diego County
Registrar of Voters canvass the returns of the General Municipal
Election; and,
WHEREAS, this is a General Election, and funds need to be
appropriated to cover the cost of said election.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
DOES RESOLVE, DECLARE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That pursuant to the requirements of the Chula
vista Charter, there is called and ordered to be held in the City
of Chula vista on Tuesday, November 3, 1992, a General Municipal
Election for the purpose of electing councilmembers to seats 3 and
4 on the City Council and to submit to the voters proposed Charter
Amendments.
SECTION 2. That pursuant to Section 23302 of the Elections
Code, the Board of Supervisors of the County of San Diego is hereby
requested to consent and agree to the consolidation of a General
Municipal Election with the statewide General Election on Tuesday,
November 3, 1992, for the election of two Members of the city
Council and submission of proposed Charter Amendments.
SECTION 3. That
submitted to the voters
follows:
a proposed Charter Amendment measure be
shall appear on the ballot substantially as
92chtrl. wp
July 23, 1992
Reso Re Proposed Charter Changes, 1992
Page 1
J).- / I
Runoff Elections: Shall section 300 be amended
to provide that, if a municipal election does
not produce majority winner and a special
election is required among the two highest Yes
candidates, the third highest candidate shall
be given the opportunity to participate in the
runoff election if one of the two runoff
election candidates dies more than ninety days
preceding that election; and to allow election No
of the remaining candidate by operation of law
if the candidate receiving the third highest
number of votes declines to run?
SECTION 4. Upon certification of the results of the election
wherein it is truly and properly certified that the abovementioned
ballot label has received an affirmative vote by a majority of
votes cast, the following changes to the Charter shall be deemed
ordained by the People of the City of Chula vista:
"
Sec. 300. Members. Eliaibilitv and Terms.
A. There shall be a City Council of five members,
consisting of four Councilmembers and a Mayor, elected from
the City at large at the times and in the manner provided in
this Charter.
B. No person shall be eligible to hold office as members
of the city Council unless they are residents of the City of
Chula Vista, and at the time of their election or appointment,
qualified electors of the city or of territory annexed
thereto.
C. The term of each member of the city Council shall be
for a nominal term of four years and shall commence on the
first Tuesday of December of the year of the election, and
shall continue until a successor qualifies. The term for the
Mayoral seat and Council seats numbered one (1) and two (2)
shall be deemed to commence on every fourth anniversary of the
first Tuesday of December of 1990 and the term ~ for
Council seats numbered three (3) and four(4) shall be deemed
to commence on every fourth anniversary of the first Tuesday
of December of 1988.
D. No person shall be eligible for nomination and
election to the office of city Councilmember or Mayor for more
than two (2) consecutive terms, and no person who has held a
Council office for a period of two (2) consecutive terms or
the office of Mayor for two (2) consecutive terms, may again
seek nomination and election to said offices of Councilor
Mayor respectively until a period of one (1) year from the
92chtrl. wp
July 23, 1992
Reso Re Proposed Charter Changes, 1992
Page 2
~J--/ :l
termination of the second term for Councilmember or Mayor has
elapsed; provided, however, that any person who is appointed
by the council to fill the office of Councilor Mayor or
elected in a special election for the balance of a regular
term of Mayor and/or council for a period of two (2) years or
less may seek nomination and election for two (2) full terms
thereafter.
E. Each Council seat shall be numbered one (1) through
four (4) respectively. Persons seeking election to the city
council shall at the time of filing nomination papers, select
one of said seats as the council position for which they seek
election.
F. Persons running for a Council office shall designate
one of the two numbered council seats as memorialized by
resolution of the Chula vista city council on file in the
office of the City Clerk. Should a vacancy occur at any time
in a council seat or seats, if said vacancy is to be filled by
a special election as provided in section 303 of the Charter,
candidates for said vacancy shall similarly designate the
appropriate numbered seat on their nominating paper.
G. Any person to be elected at a general municipal
election for any numbered Council seat 1 through 4 or the
office of Mayor for which nomination papers have been filed
shall be deemed elected upon receipt of a majority of the
votes cast for the particular seat or the Office of Mayor at
the election. If no candidate at such general municipal
election receives a majority of the votes cast, there shall be
a special runoff election, to be held on the same date as the
statewide election date in November immediately following the
general municipal election (if no statewide election is
conducted, then on the first Tuesday after the first Monday of
November of each even-numbered year), between the two
candidates receiving the highest and second highest number of
votes in the general municipal election for said seat or the
Office of Mayor, in order to determine the winner. By way of
clarification, ties among the candidates receiving the two
highest number of votes at the general Municipal election
shall be resolved by a special runoff election.
H. Any person to be elected at a special municipal
election called to fill a vacancy pursuant to the provision of
section 303 for any numbered council seats one through four or
the Office of Mayor, for which nomination papers have been
filed, shall be deemed elected upon receipt of a majority of
the votes cast for the particular seat or the Office of Mayor
at the election. If no candidate at such special election
receives a majority of the votes cast, there shall be a
92chtr1.wp
July 23, 1992
Reso Re Proposed Charter Changes, 1992
Page 3
;J,J-I:J
special run-off election to be held on a date set by Council
as soon after such special election as practical between the
two candidates receiving the highest and second highest number
of votes in such special election for said seat or the Office
of Mayor in order to determine the winner and shall be seated
upon certification of the results of the election. By way of
clarification, ties among the candidates receiving the two
highest number of votes at such special election shall be
resolved by a special run-off election.
I. If one of the two candidates eliqible to run in a
special runoff election dies on or before the ninetieth dav
prior to the special runoff election. his or her name shall
not be placed on the ballot. The candidate receivinq the
third hiqhest number of votes in the qeneral municipal elec-
tion for said seat or the Office of Mavor shall be offered bv
the city Clerk. the opportunity to be placed on the ballot in
lieu of the deceased. The city Clerk shall make the offer in
writinq immediatelY upon notification of the death. The
candidate shall accept or reiect in writinq to the Clerk
within five calendar days of receipt of the city Clerk's
offer. If accepted. the special runoff election between the
remaininq candidate and the candidate receivinq the third
hiqhest number shall be held. If reiected. there shall be no
runoff election. and the remaininq candidate shall be deemed
elected as of the date of such death.
;h-ll.. Any person to be elected at a special run-off
election required under the provision of this section, shall
be deemed elected upon receipt of the highest number of votes
for the particular seat or the Office of Mayor and shall be
seated upon certification of the results of the election.
Ties at such special run-off election shall be resolved by
lot. "
92 chtr1. wp
July 23, 1992
Reso Re Proposed Charter Changes, 1992
4 ~~4
c2;2,Jo/
SECTION 5. That a proposed Charter Amendment measure be submitted
to the voters is as follows:
vacancies: Shall section 303 be amended to
create a vacancy if a Councilmember, without
excuse granted contemporaneously, is absent
from either three consecutive regular meetings YES
scheduled and held, or any ten such meetings
within a twelve-month period; to require
Council to grant excuse for temporary illness
preventing the Councilmember's attendance; and NO
to require Council declare vacancy as soon as
practicable, and use best efforts to appoint a
replacement within thirty days, or call a
special election?
SECTION 6. Upon certification of the results of the election
wherein it is truly and properly certified that the abovementioned
ballot label has received an affirmative vote by a majority of
votes cast, the following changes to the Charter shall be deemed
ordained by the People of the city of Chula Vista:
.f Sec. 303. Vacancies.
A vacancy in the office of any member of the City Council
from whatever cause arising, shall be filled by appointment by
the City Council, such appointee to hold office until the
first Tuesday following the next general municipal election
and until a successor qualifies. At the next general
municipal election following any vacancy, a Councilmember or
Mayor shall be elected to serve for the remainder of any
unexpired term of said office.
If a member of the City Council is absent from ~ three
(3) consecutive regular meetings of the City Council scheduled
and held for a period af thirty days eaRsee~tively from aRd
after tho laot rc~~lar City couneil meeting attcn6ca ey saah
member, or anv ten such meetinqs (whether or not consecutive)
within a twelve-month period. unless by permission of the city
Council expressed in its official minutes contemporaneous Iv
with such absences, or is convicted of a felony or crime
involving moral turpitude, the office shall become vacant.
The permission of the Council shall be qranted for anv tem-
porarv illnesses disablinq a Councilmember from attendance at
such meetinq upon his or her request.
The city Council shall declare the existence of any
vacancy as soon as practicable. The citv Council shall use
its best efforts in qood faith to fill such vacancv bv ap-
92chtrl. wp
July 23, 1992
Reso Re Proposed Charter Changes, 1992
5 Page 5
/'
. ,2J-/j
pointment within thirty days of their declaration of the
existence of the vacancy. In the event it shall fail to fill
a vacancy by appointment within thirty days after such office
shall have been so declared vacant, or sooner. if impasse is
reached sooner. it shall forthwith cause an election to be held
to fill such vacancy. ,,1
1 City Attorney recommends going forward with this recommendation but
referring the matter of the restructuring of this section back to the CRC to deal
first with what may constitute a vacancy, and then what the Council is to do,
including if necessary, call a special election, and then how long the new
councilperson is to serve. For example:
"
A. Event of Vacancy.
An office of the City Council shall be vacant upon the occurance of
the following events:
1. The absence of a Councilperson from three (3) consecutive
regular meetings of the City Council scheduled and held, or
any ten such meetings (whether or not consecutive) within a
twelve-month period, unless by permission of the City Council
expressed in its official minutes contemporaneously with such
absences (The permission of the Council shall be granted for
any temporary illnesses upon the request of Councilmember
disabling him or her from attendance at such meeting.);
2. Conviction of a felony or crime involving moral turpitude;
3. Death of a Councilperson.
B. Filling the Vacancy.
The City Council shall declare the existence of any vacancy as soon
as practicable. The City Council shall use its best efforts in good faith
to fill such vacancy by appointment within thirty days of their
declaration of the existence of the vacancy. In the event it shall fail
to fill a vacancy by appointment within thirty days after such office
shall have been so declared vacant, or sooner, if impasse is reached
sooner I it shall forthwith cause an election to be held to fill such
vacancy.
C. Duration of Term of Appointed or Elected Replacement
Councilperson
A Councilperson elected or appointed to fill a vacancy under the
provisions of this section shall hold office until the first Tuesday
following the next general municipal election and until a successor
qualifies. At the next general municipal election following any vacancy,
a Councilmember or Mayor shall be elected to serve for the remainder of
any unexpired term of said office."
92chtrl. wp
July 23, 1992
Reso Re Proposed Charter
6
Changes, 1992
Page 6
,2;2"-/{,
SECTION 7. That a proposed Charter Amendment measure be
submitted to the voters is as follows:
Mayor's salary: Shall section 304 of the
Charter be amended to make a technical, non- YES
substantive change to clarify the annual cost
of living adjustment to the mayor's salary NO
without changing the method by which said cost
of living adjustment is calculated?
SECTION 8. Upon certification of the results of the election
wherein it is truly and properly certified that the abovementioned
ballot label has received an affirmative vote by a majority of
votes cast, the following changes to the Charter shall be deemed
ordained by the People of the city of Chula Vista:
"Sec. 304.
presidinq Officer. Mavor.
(a) Mayor. There shall be
municipal election a Mayor who shall
four years and until a successor is
elected at the general
hold office for a term of
elected and qualified.
(b) Duties. The Mayor shall be a member of the City
Council and shall perform all the functions and have all of
the powers and rights of a duly elected Councilmember. In
addition to said powers and duties, the Mayor shall have the
power and duty:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
92chtrl. wp
July 23, 1992
to report to the City Council annually and from
time to time on the affairs of the City and to
recommend for its consideration such matters as
deemed expedient, and
to be the official head of the city for all
political and ceremonial purposes and to be
recognized by the courts for the purpose of serving
civil process, for the signing of all legal
instruments and documents, and by the Governor for
emergency purposes, and
in the time of public danger or emergency, the
Mayor, with the consent of the Council, and for
such period as the Council may fix, to take command
of the police, maintain order and enforce the law,
and
to assume the primary, but not the exclusive
responsibility, for interpreting to the people the
policies, programs and needs of the City government
and for informing the people of any major change in
Reso Re Proposed Charter Changes, 1992
7 Page 7
;2')'-/?
policy or program. The Mayor may represent the
City in any and all matters involving other
governmental agencies, provided that no act,
promise, commitment or agreement entered into or
committed by the Mayor shall be binding upon the
City of Chula vista unless duly authorized or
ratified by the city Council, and
(5) to represent the City in all regional public
agencies which require an elected City official,
unless otherwise determined by the City Council,
and
(6) to supervise the operation of the Mayor/Council
office and personnel assigned thereto, and
(7) to perform such other duties consistent with the
office as may be prescribed by this Charter or
delegated to the Mayor or imposed on the Mayor by
the city Council if not inconsistent with the
provisions of this Charter, and
(8) to exercise the full-time function as Mayor of the
city during the usual business hours that the
offices of the City are open, and such other hours
and times as shall be necessary to discharge in
full the duties imposed upon the Mayor.
(c) Compensation. The Mayor shall receive an annual
salary of thirty-seven thousand two hundred dollars
($37,200.00) per year and shall receive reimbursement on order
of the Council for Council-authorized travel and other
expenses when on official duty out of the city, and in
addition, shall receive the sum of fifty dollars ($50.00) per
month, which amount shall be deemed to be reimbursement of
other out-of-pocket expenditures. The city Council may also
provide, by resolution, for the payment to the Mayor of an
allowance of a sum certain per month, as reimbursement for the
additional demands and expenses made upon and incurred by the
Mayor.
The salary provided herein may be annually increased
beyond said amount by a resolution of the City Council in an
amount not to exceed the proportionate qrowth in the All Urban
Consumers/All Items Component of the San Diego Metropolitan
Area Y (Broader Base) Consumer Price Index since the date of
the last adiustment, or beyond said increased amount, by a
vote of the people.
(d) Mayor Pro Tempore. The city council shall designate
92chtrl. wp
July 23, 1992
Reso Re Proposed Charter Changes, 1992
8 Page 8
,).J. -I g"
one of its members as Mayor Pro Tempore, who shall serve in
such capacity at the pleasure of the City Council. The Mayor
Pro Tempore shall perform the duties of the Mayor during the
Mayor's absence or disability."
SECTION 9. That a proposed Charter Amendment measure be
submitted to the voters is as follows:
Prohibited Acts: Shall section 305 of the YES
Charter be amended to add a provision
prohibiting the City Council from making a NO
gift of pUblic funds?
SECTION 10. Upon certification of the results of the election
wherein it is truly and properly certified that the abovementioned
ballot label has received an affirmative vote by a majority of
votes cast, the following changes to the Charter shall be deemed
ordained by the People of the city of Chula vista:
.. Sec. 305. Prohibited Acts.
The Citv Council shall have no oower to qive or to lend.
or to authorize the qivinq or lendinq. of the credit of the
citv. in aid or to anv oersons. association. or corooration.
whether municioal or otherwise. or to oledqe the credit there-
of. in anv manner whatever for the oavment of the liabilities
of anv individual. association. municioal or other coroora-
tion. whatever: nor shall it have oower to make anv qift or
authorize the makinq of any qift. of any oublic money or thinq
of value to any individual. municioal or other corooration
whatever; orovided. that nothinq in this section shall orevent
the city qrantinq aid for the ooor.
No member of the Council shall directly or indirectly, by
suggestion or otherwise, attempt to unduly influence the City
Manager or other officer appointed or confirmed by the Council
in their performance of duties.
The Mayor and the couRcilmeR Councilmembers are hereby
individually and collectively prohibited from performing any
administrative or executive functions except as same may be
authorized by this Charter or by ordinance of the city of
Chula vista.
Except for the purpose of inquiry, the Council and its
members shall deal with that part of the administrative
service for which the city Manager is responsible solely
through the City Manager.
92chtrl. wp
July 23, 1992
Reso Re Proposed Charter Changes, 1992
9 Page 9
~).,./c;
A violation of the provlslons of
member of the Council shall constitute
the offending member may be removed
Council."
this section by any
misconduct for which
from office by the
SECTION 11. That a proposed Charter Amendment measure be
submitted to the voters is as follows:
Appointive Bodies: Shall section 600 be
amended to apply to committees; allow Council
to provide additional powers for Charter- YES
created bodies; require sunset provisions;
authorize Council to delegate final decision-
making authority to such bodies; to exempt NO
special advisory bodies expected to exist for
six months or less from certain Charter
requirements; and to exempt certain other
bodies?
SECTION 12. Upon certification of the results of the election
wherein it is truly and properly certified that the abovementioned
ballot label has received an affirmative vote by a majority of
votes cast, the following changes to the Charter shall be deemed
ordained by the People of the City of Chula Vista:
"ARTICLE VI.
APPOINTIVE BOARDS. COMMITTEES AND COMMISSIONS.
Sec. 600. In General.
There shall be the boards and commissions enumerated in
this article which shall have the powers and duties set forth
in this Charter and such additional powers and duties as the
city Council. bv ordinance. provides. includinq the authority
to make final decisions as to certain specified matters other-
wise within the authority of the Council. In addition, the
City Council, may create, by ordinance, such boardsL
committees or commissions as, in its judgment, are required
and may grant to them such powers and duties as are consistent
with the provisions of this Charter. includinq the authority
to make final decisions as to certain specified matters
otherwise within the authority of the Council. Such ordinance
shall contain a sunset provision specifvinq when such bodY
shall cease to exist unless expresslY extended bv Council bv
ordinance. Btieft The boards. committees and commissions shall
consult with and advise the Mayor, Councilor City ManagerL
and perform such other duties as may be provided herein or in
the ordinances establishing or relatina to such boardsL
committees and commissions, but they shall have no authority
to direct the conduct of any department. cl!ccet a[]
oeceifieall~ a~theLizea iR tRio Charter SF o~eh eraiRaRe~o.
92chtrl. wp
July 23, 1992
Reso Re Proposed Charter Changes, 1992
10 Page 10
~.)-~I)
Special purpose advisory committees of an anticipated term of
six months or less are exempt from the reauirements of this
article relatina to creation bv ordinance. appropriations.
appointments. terms. vacancies. eliaibilitv. meetinas.
chairperson. oaths and affirmations. but shall have no
authority to direct the conduct of anv department. The
provisions of this article shall not be applicable to advisory
aroups the maiority of whose members are elected officers
and/or employees of the city and/or any officers and/or
employees of other aovernmental entities.
SECTION 13. That a proposed Charter Amendment measure be
submitted to the voters is as follows:
Appointments, Terms and Vacancies: Shall
section 602 of the Charter be amended to apply
to commi ttees as well as boards and YES
commissions; and to allow initial terms of
less than two years to be disregarded for the
purposes of the two-term limit on service, in
the same manner as currently allowed for NO
persons appointed to fill a position with an
unexpired term of two years or less?
SECTION 14. Upon certification of the results of the election
wherein it is truly and properly certified that the abovementioned
ballot label has received an affirmative vote by a majority of
votes cast, the following changes to the Charter shall be deemed
ordained by the People of the City of Chula Vista:
Sec. 602. Appointments: Terms and Vacancies.
(a) Appointments and Terms. The members of each of such
boards or comissioRs bodies shall be appointed, and shall be
subject to removal, by motion of the City Council adopted by
at least three affirmative votes. The members thereof shall
serve for a term of four (4) years and until their respective
successors are appointed and qualified. Members of such
advisory eearas aRa eemmissioRsbodies shall be limited to a
maximum of two (2) consecutive terms and an interval of two
(2) years must pass before a person who has served two (2)
consecutive terms may be reappointed to the commissieR bodY
upon which the member had served; provided, further, that for
the purpose of this section, an appointment to fill an initial
term or an unexpired term of less than two (2) years in
duration shall not be considered as a term; however, any
appointment to fill an initial term or an unexpired term in
excess of two (2) years shall be considered to be a full term.
92chtrl. wp
July 23, 1992
Reso Re Proposed Charter Changes, 1992
11 Page 11
,};J, - :21
(b) Initial Classification of Appointees. The
members first appointed to such soaras aRs eemmissioRsbodies
shall so classify themselves by lot so that each succeeding
July 1st the term of one (1) of their number shall expire. If
the total number of members of a seara er eommissieR such bodY
to be appointed exceeds four (4), the classification by lot
shall provide for the grouping of terms to such an extent as
is necessary in order that the term of at least one (1) member
shall expire on each succeeding July 1st.
(c) Vacancies. Vacancies in any soara er
commissioR such bodY , from whatever cause arising, shall be
filled by appointment by the city council. Upon a vacancy
occurring leaving an unexpired portion of a term, any
appointment to fill such vacancy shall be for the unexpired
portion of such term. If a member of a heara af
cammissioRbodv is absent from three (3) regular meetings of
such hoard or eemmissioRbodv, consecutively, unless by
permission of such hoara er eemmissieRbodv expressed in its
official minutes, or is convicted of a felony or crime
involving moral turpitude, or ceases to be a qualified elector
of the City, the office shall become vacant and shall be so
declared by the city Council.
(d) Eligibility. All members of hoards aRd
commissieRssuch bodies shall be qualified electors in the City
of Chula vista with the exception of Youth Commissioners who
need only be residents of the City of Chula Vista. No person
may be appointed nor shall serve on more than one of the
Charter-created boards or commissions simultaneously."
SECTION 15. That a proposed Charter Amendment measure be
submitted to the voters is as follows:
Public Works Contracts: Shall section 1009 be
amended to increase the minimum amounts that
trigger the application of existing, increas- YES
ingly stringent, bidding procedures required of
the city Manager and City Council; and to allow
the City Council to waive any defects in bids NO
if, at a public hearing, the Council finds such
waiver is in the public interest?
SECTION 16. Upon certification of the results of the election
wherein it is truly and properly certified that the abovementioned
ballot label has received an affirmative vote by a majority of
votes cast, the following changes to the Charter shall be deemed
ordained by the People of the City of Chula vista:
92chtrl. wp
July 23, 1992
Reso Re Proposed Charter Changes, 1992
12 Page 12
:2:2' ;J.~
"Sec. 1009.
Contracts on Public Works.
In the construction, reconstruction, or repair of
public buildings, streets, drains, sewers, parks, playgrounds
and other public works, the furnishing of supplies, materials,
equipment or contractual services for same shall be done by
written contract approved as to form and legality by the City
Attorney.
Every project involving an expenditure of
l:\:eRl:y five fiftv thousand dollars ($~50,000.00) or more for
the construction, reconstruction, improvement or repair of
public buildings, streets, drains, sewers, utilities, parks
and playgrounds and other public works, and the furnishing of
supplies, materials, equipment or contractual services for
same shall be done by written contract except as otherwise
provided in this chapter, and the Council, upon the
recommendation of the City Manager, shall let said contract to
the lowest responsible bidder after notice by pUblication in
the official newspaper for sealed bids for the work
contemplated by one or more insertions, the first of which
shall be at least ten days before the time for opening bids.
If the cost of said pUblic works project is more than the sum
of ~ twentY-five thousand dollars ($~25,000.00) but less
than l:\Jcnty fivc fifty thousand dollars ($~50,000.00), the
City Council may let said contract without advertising for
bids after the City Manager or his designated agent has
secured competitive prices from interested contractors; which
shall be considered by the Council before said contract is
let.
If the project involves the expenditure of ~
twentv-five thousand dollars ($~25,000.00) or less, the city
Manager may cause such written contract to be let without
advertising for bids. However, except in emergencies, the
City Engineer or the Purchasing Agent shall obtain informal
bids. The project shall be awarded to the lowest responsible
bidder whose bid is determined to be, in all respects, most
advantageous to the public interest. The City Engineer may
solicit such bids personally, by telephone or by mail, and
shall submit to the Purchasing Agent and the City Manager a
written account of the procedures used and the bids thus
obtained. A copy of said informal bidding procedure shall be
filed in the Office of the City Clerk as a public record.
The City Council may, however, declare and
determine that, in its opinion, based upon estimates approved
by and the recommendations of the City Manager, said projects
may be excepted from the requirements of this section because
92chtrl. wp
July 23, 1992
Reso Re Proposed Charter Changes, 1992
13 Page 13
eJ). *' .J-:3
the work in question may be performed better or more
economically by the City with its own employees, and by a
resolution to this effect, adopted by at least four
affirmative votes of the Council, order the performance of any
such construction, reconstruction, improvement or repair by
appropriate city forces.
All bids of more than b.-CRty five fifty thousand
dollars ($~50,000.00) shall be accompanied by either a
certified or cashier's check, or a bidder's bond executed by
a corporate surety authorized to engage in such business in
California, made payable to the city. Such security shall be
in an amount not less than that specified in the notice
inviting bids or in the specifications referred to therein, or
if no amount be so specified, then in an amount not less than
ten percent (10%) of the aggregate amount of the bid. If the
successful bidder neglects or refuses to enter into the
contract within the time specified in the notice inviting bids
or specifications referred to therein, the amount of his
bidder's security shall be declared forfeited to the city and
shall be collected and paid into its general fund and all
bonds so forfeited shall be prosecuted and the amount thereof
collected and paid into such fund.
The City Council shall be competent to award any
contract by comparison of bids on the basis of several factors
including timelY completion. Such an award shall be secured
by a surety bond as hereinabove provided with adequate
sureties and penalties, and provided, further, that for any
contract awarded solely or partially on a specified time for
completion, the Council shall not extend such time limits
unless such extension Be recommended by the City Manager and
the head of the Department concerned.
The city Council may reject any and all bids
presented and may readvertise in its discretion. The citv
Council may waive any defects in any bid to the extent it
finds at a public hearinq held for that purpose that it is
necessary to do so for the benefit of the public.
Contracts may likewise be let without advertising
for bids if such work shall be deemed by the City Council to
be of urgent necessity for the preservation of life, health or
property, and shall be authorized by resolution passed by at
least four affirmative votes of the Council and containing a
declaration of the facts constituting such urgency; provided,
however, that nothing in this section shall prevent the city
Manager from taking any and all means necessary to make
emergency repairs in the event of immediate need arising from
any calamity or disaster."
92chtrl. wp
July 23, 1992
Reso Re Proposed Charter Changes, 1992
14 Page 14
,;;. ;2 - ;2 'I
SECTION 17. That funds in the amount of $100,000.00 be
appropriated from the unappropriated reserve of the general fund to
Account No. 0100-0170-5202 to cover the estimated cost of the
election.
SECTION 18.
authorized to
Election.
That the San Diego County Registrar of Voters is
canvass the returns of the General Municipal
SECTION 19. That the City of Chula vista recognizes that
additional costs will be incurred by the County by reason of this
consolidation and agrees to reimburse the County for any costs.
SECTION 20. That the City Clerk
copy of this resolution with the
Supervisors and Registrar of Voters.
is hereby directed to file a
San Diego County Board of
SECTION 21. The Council reserves the authority to make minor
technical changes, amendments and deletions in the actual language
of the Charter amendments herewith set forth in sections 3 through
16 between the date of adoption of this resolution and end of the
public examination period, upon a finding that such change is
necessary in order to have the language achieve the plain meaning
of the purposes and intent of the ballot label and upon receipt of
4j5ths vote at a public hearing conducted at a televised and
regularly scheduled meeting of the City Council.
SECTION 21. That
and adoption of this
original Resolutions.
the city Clerk shall certify to the passage
Resolution and enter it into the book of
92chtrl. wp
July 23, 1992
Reso Re Proposed Charter Changes, 1992
15 Page 15
').,2;~
(/.J,
l
,
~
~~f?
~
~~~~
"'"~ -=~
1;<:\
rr.. /
'i r;il. ,
ll[ ,., ." ~ f\ ~
n uLI~\"Li
APR231392>
MAYOR'S Of FleE
J:hula Vista, CA
./'
THE CI
jltAIW)Oj(
ACI<NW Lm..- s.s..ta.
APPT l TIL
QAVOR FILE ./
CIN OF
CHUlA VISTA
-=
CHULA VI
Please Indicate Your Interest By Checking the Appropriate Line(s)
If You Check More Than One Line, Please Prioritize Your Interest
_____ Board of Appeals
Ch i ld Care
:....-- Cmsm on Aging
_ Elderly & Handicapped Cmt
_____ Int. Friendship emsn
_____ Montgomery C.P.c.
Planning emsn
~TOwn Centre Proj. Area Cmt
Chula Vista 21
Board of Ethics
Civil Service omsn
______ Design Rev tmt
_ Growth Mgmt. Cmsm
_____ Library Board of Trustees
_____ Otay Valley Proj. Area Cmt
Resource ConSy emsn
______ Uni ted Nat i ons Day Cmt
UC - CV
Charter Review
CuLtural Arts
Economic Dev.
Hl.In8n Rel. emsn
Mob; lehorne Rent Review tmsm.
Parks & Rec emsn
______ Safety emsn
Youth emsn
OTHER
PLEASE PRINT CLEARLY
NAME:
MICHAEL
S7EltV e.~
RES. PHONE NO.
BUS. PHONE NO.
liP: q ''I/O
REGISTERED VOTER IN CHUlA VISTA: ~ _
YES NO
HOME ADDRESS:
DO YOU lIVE WITHIN THE CITY liMITS OF CHUlA VISTA? ~
YES -rrcl
HOW lONG?
2. 1/1.... 't (....,S
*Youth commission Applicants ONLY: School Attending
Grade:
COLLEGES ATTENDED & DEGREES HELD:
S"4W CLe:c..O S"7'A-Te ()t.JIVELS 17 'I - B. A./ H'~iiT(j((,'t'
.
PRESENT EMPLOYER: (<<..e AS e. ~. r P-lC c.. ~ /.JS\J~4""CE. AI.EIoJC'( POSITION:
S4Les / Pto~uc E R.. - A~NT
.
WHAT ARE YOUR PRINCIPAL AREAS OF INTEREST IN OUR CITY GOVERNMENT AND WHAT EXPERIENCECS) OR SPECIAL KNOWLEDGE CAN YOU YOU BRING
TO THOSE AREAS? O"...A,\.L C.....C.e:..N Poll. Cll'!' c;.OtJE.L""MetJ-rI"~o lIS e.FPE~TIVe.
MA."'''',-'''E.oJT. :r HA.UE DWAJell ~ '&u.s/,,,ESS {t.J DOW"TOWrJ c.fl.UI..A. ~(ST^ FoP...
I:!.'IL 'tEAtS. ~ HA.LlE se.l..ue~ /1.51 t>i.e.sIDEN, OF :i)O..,tJ-rOc...)N BUSoJE:s.s ASSOCf"'Tt6..J,
SEe..u~.o 6~ e:ehlO,",Il!.. b6lELo-PiltGlr[ sul$(lOlllli1lTT"Ec'" ll-rE~WlSe. ';!:~\I01..~€{J fY\YS~LF
=l=N ~e:fI,.S OF C'O"'''''''''IT'( COr-lCt!e....S.
WHAT WOULD YOU HOPE TO ACCOMPLISH BY YOUR PARTICIPATION?
:t.. C6U L j) .B Ia l'-l Cr A (.tJMU l.. t:: ~(,. t::. 6 ~ Tf/ E ::r.ss () ES f' At:../1oJ (,.
J)OWtvTow,..) A.P...€A ~S wELL A..5 TH{iE GJII..L/tJ'-fJIE.S.s TO I11.J!+.KE.
~e.t.5DNAL eo"" 1I1/771tlEIVTS To AUolM.fl.lSI1 \.v~L.AAlU-rE.Ll 7>4,5((5.
It/€:.
ru E~€SSA( l'
I am familiar with the responsibilities assigned to the Board/Commission/Committee on which I wish to serve.
~d..t.J~~u~ 1/ I ~2.3,/9?L
SIGNATURE '~7e - ... OATE
* * . PLEASE SEE TIE REVERSE SIDE OF THIS ",,:n..._.._ ._ VERY IMPORTANT LEGAL UIFORMATlON * * *
CC-Oll