HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 1982-10869
RESOLUTION NO. 10869
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA APPROVING REVISED REGIONAL SOLID WASTE
MANAGEMENT PLAN
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula Vista does hereby approve the Regional Solid
Waste Management Plan 1982-2000, a copy of which is attached
hereto and incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in
full, conditioned upon the plan being updated relative to the
SANDER project as outlined in the letter from R. J. Massman dated
May 11, 1982.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk of the City of
Chula Vista be, and she is hereby directed to formally notify the
Board of Supervisors of the Council's action.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
~L_
~-/ -,
-<-~
. 1/1'-; / '
John P. Lippitt, City Engineer
/~~0 J.C ,
/"
George D. Lindberg, City Attorney
ADOPTED AND APPROVED by the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 18th day of May ,
198 2 , by the following vote, to-wit:
Scott, Cox, Gi11ow, Moore, McCand1iss
AYES: Councilmen
NAYES:
Councilmen
None
ABSENT:
Councilmen
None
J1 '. ~h ~, Mayor 0
ATTE~;?l/'/<,? / /' /'/ (~t' /:/./7
i// City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO) ss.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA)
I, , City Clerk of the
City of Chula Vista, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above
is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. , and
that the same has not been amended or repealed. DATED
City Clerk
COUNTY OF SAN
(> /;
(ldytfi/cfc1
DIEGO
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
R. J. MASSMAN, Director
BUILDING 2 5555 OVERLAND AVENUE
SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92123
TELEPHONE j714) 565.5177
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Offices of:
TOM HAMILTON
First Olstrif.:t
County Engil1f'er
COlJnty Road CommiSSioner
May 11, 1982
PAUL W. FORDEM
Second District
County Surveyor
County AirpOrts
ROGER HEDGfCOCK
Third District
Flood Control
Liquid Waste
Solid Waste
JIM BATES
Fourth District
PAUL ECKERT
Filth District
Transportation Operations
Mr. Bill Harshman
Engineering Department
City of Chula Vista
P.O. Box 1087
Chula Vista, CA 92012
Subject: Draft Revised Regional Solid Waste Management Plan
Dear Mr. Harshman:
Pursuant to your request of April 29, 1982, the following is a
clarification of the San Diego Energy Recovery (SANDER) Project
discussion contained in the Plan (X-4).
At the request of the City of Chula Vista (see attached letter dated
March 18, 1982) work has begun on further study regarding the con-
cerns raised by Chula Vista City Council and City staff regarding
locating SANDER in the City of Chula Vista.
To accomplish this task, the San Diego County Board of Supervisors
approved (April 13, 1982 (Items 26, 27, 28) ) contract amendments
to revise the scope of work for the SANDER planning effort
(see attached). The revised scope of work now includes evaluation
of the candidate site for SANDER in Chula Vista. SANDER staff will
be working with City of Chula Vista staff on this project.
According to the scope of work amendment, the Consultant will submit
an administrative draft of the Chula Vista site analysis and relevant
sections of the addition to the Draft EIR on or before June 30, 1982
for review by SANDER staff and City of Chula Vista staff.
The Final Revised Regional Solid Waste Management Plan will be updated
to contain the above discussion.
11- / (}?'Id
To: Mr. Bill Harshman
page 2.
May 11, 1982
If you have any questions, please contact Sharon Reid, Solid Waste
Program Manager, at 565-3987.
%J(1ot.ot.1L_
f(y.!'Jj MASSMAN, Director
')....oDepartment of Public Works
RJM:JMQ:ck
cc: Nicole A. Clay
Attachment
1-/tJ'69
,,:"(','
...~_'"'\~(.
':Y ~-:,f.i:--""""
. 'y",. ",I ':Y0',
:,""., ;.-'-~"-'L . ._"':'_........:.~~.,.
....~-,.-..;~~-> .": '\ .,
'. i~~:;:~~~:::::.~~ .- _ - _~1.:_.
. -~_..__. ......... .~1.J
- 4"";;''':'''''' '>..- . 0 ..' ..
:~.._' E:...fI...~~~.~~i"':.
.~-> Y.<...-.... .
'.. '0.' ~.. ..' . ~
Vt..; 4;:-
.\ ';G,,1': ,;ti!;~:1 . ~.
~"~~f.t " - ,,-
.\ 'I;- ,.
. ,. ---
..-1,.'( " t.,"
11AR 2 /1 198i!
/7ltf
City of
C Iz u I a 1/i s t a J C al if 0 r 11 i a
,
OFFICE OF THE MAYOR
Gr9gory R. Cox
March 18, 1982
The Honorable Tom Hamil ton
Chainman, SANDER Authority Board of Directors
County of San Diego
1600 Pacific Highway, Room 335
San Diego, California 92101
SUBJE~T: SAN DIEGO ENERGY RECOVERY (SANDER) PROJECT
Dear Tom:
The Chula Vista City Council has appreciated the opportunity to learn
about the SANDER waste-to-energy project. The briefings we have re-
ceived have indicated to us that this project is necessary and in fact,
might be suitable to locate in Chula Vista. Based on this interest in
locating SANDER in Chula Vista, we would request that the Board of
Directors study further the environmental and financial feasibility of
locating SANDER in Chula Vista.
We have directed our staff to work with SANDER in the areas of environ-
mental, financial, public information and energy markets to provide us
with more speci"c information so we can make a final decision as to
Cil~~d ~;~tdt~ {Vlt In the SANDER Project.
We look forward to working with you on this very important project.
"X'Y' !/ C,
Gregor~ox
MAYOR ry "'.rt
GRC:pw
f- ji)f 6'1
,/
... :: t\ -: t. ~'.
2 6 FOuftTH ;,\'HoE . '...r.j~j~ t. ,/':),;. '~;._ii-OR~.I,l. 9?0.0 . TELFPrl.jrlt. (1:4) 5r~-5G44
. ~. ~
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO - AGENDA ITEMS
TO:
BOA RD OF _n~!!P'~!:~_i_~~!:~________n_________n_______________n_________n_h__.__
FROM: CAD/SANDER
MEETING DATE
April 13, 1982
Project
SUBJECT
SANDER
OATE: March 30, 1982
Project - Contract Amendments ~nd Technical Evaluation Trip
) REFERRAL 0 YES [2\ NO sUPV. GIST:
PREVIOUS RELEVAN; BOARD ACTION:
RECOMMENDED ACTION:
1. Approve and authorize execution by t:le Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the First
Amendment to the contract with New Horizons Planning Consultants (Contract #16198-5850E)t
additional public information and environmental impact report services subject to
Civil Service Commission determination approving.
2. Approve and authorize execution by the Clerk of the Board of Supervisors of the Third
. Amendment to the contr.act with Ecology Centre, Inc. (Contract No. 15162-5850E) for ad-
ditional resource recovery s~rvices subject to Civil Service Commission determination
approving.
3. Approve the travel request for six persons to participate in a technical evaluation tour
of two solid waste to energy facilities: one operating in Chicago, Illinois and one" under
construction in Pinellas, Florida.
SUMMARY OF REQUEST/REPORT: On March 18, 1982, the Chula Vista City Councll dlrected a leti
to the San Diego Energy Recovery (SANDER) Authority Board of Directors expressing their
interest in locatin9 the SANDER solid waste to energy facility in the City of Chula Visi
(attachment). In this letter, the City Council requested specific environmental and
public information services based on siting the facility in Chula Vista. The proposed
fi rst amendment of $45,270 to the agreement with New Horizons Pl anni ng Consultants will
provide public information and environmental impact report services specifically directec
towards and required by the designation of Chula.Vista as the new principal SANDER site.
(The existing agreement with New Horizons was approved by your Board on July 22, 1980
for $30,000). The designation of Chula Vista as the new principal site also results
in project boundary changes requiring revision of the recycling and source separation
element of the SANDER Project. The proposed Third Amendment of $15,050 to the Ecology
Centre, Inc. agreement will provide the necessary work. (The existing agreement was
approved by your Board on October 16, 1979 and totaled $68,430 including the prior two
amendments.) (Continued on "Additional Information Page")
o ORDINANCE '0 RESOLUTION
I&J AGREEMENT ICONTRACT NO_
APPROVED BY COUNTY COUNSEL AS TO LEGALITY
FlytR:Jll'S ~S: General CURRENT YEAR CDS
FuUdu& State Grant $65,153
WILL PROPOSAL REQUIRE ADDITIONAL PERSONNEL?
NO (;4 IF YES. STATE NUMBER_____nn PERMANENT..__n... TEMPORARY _"'_m_ OTHERmhhm
CONTRACT REVIEW PANEL ACTION CONCURRENCES (It Apphcablel
o APl'ROVED OIS R,,/!.:I1
Bf AUOITOR APPROV
o YES 0
IX] CIVIL SERVICE APPROVAL NEEOEC
o NOT APPLICABLE 0 STANDARD Fom.
ANNUAL COST: BUDGETED:
$65, 153 ~ YES 0 NO
BOARD POLICY (lES) APPLlCA8
CAD APPROVED.
PHONE AND MAil STOP
CAQ OR DEPT. AUTHORIZED REPR
_n~
n____~a_~~L~~~~b.U.~~~_~_____n_______m..___
CONTACT PERSON
565-58~8 (0359)
~~n~__n._._.___..
ON ~[OTION of Supervisor" Eckert, seconded by Supervisor Hamilton, the Board of Supervisors
~pproves and authorizes execution by Clerk of the Board, subject to civil Service Commission
letermination approving:
No. 26 New Horizons Planning Consultants, Inc., County Contract
No. l6l98-0200E (1) PORTER D. CRE~~S
No. 27 Ecology Centre, Inc., County Contract No. l5162-0200E (2) Clerk of the Board
No. Z~ approves (3) of Supervisors
by f~llowi:,g vote:. 1'- / 0 f 6 a (/l Ii
Ayes. :t"mJ.lton, Hedgeco<;.k, Bates, Eckert t.. :,.; "'~~ '.'.,'. B~ (Z'~.,. ~
Su:>e:::visor FErdem" b. oute of taw ~ 'lfh.an- rollt'"i.. calIe"d:'"~-...:<,4~~ Deputy ,.
..:. . :\'~:.:
.~..
';'--'''''''''''"''iliifili('':- -.
.-'~' --~..;--_.
. ".' , . ~~~~...
".....< -.-- .: -:'':'1~':'',:--,.,:':.=..::: .,<~.../!~.,. .
_'__~".......... ., :..0.,..:;_ _.
-.:..~' .r.,~;::-:.: ';-..,_
.}o-....''''.....-
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
Summary of.Request/Re~rt. (Cont:d): Beca~se of the consideration of the City
of Chula Vlsta as a prlnclpal slte,a technJcal evaluation tour of solid waste-
to-energy facilities (an existing plant in Chicago, Il and a plant currently
under construction in Pinellas, Fl) is required as an important element of the
development of the SANDER Project and the environmental impact report. It is
proposed to send three elected officials from Chula Vista, Councilman Murphy
SANDER Authority Board Secretary, the Chairman of the SANDER Authority Board
Supervisor Tom Hamilton, and one member from the SANDER staff on a 3-day tour
of the above facilities for a total cost of $4833. Appropriations for the above
contract amendments and the technical evaluation tour are in the 1981-82 Budget
for the SANDER program. The County will be reimbursed for thp cn~t of the trip
from State grant funds. 'oe SANDER Authority Board reviewed these requests at
tnelr rebruary 19, 1981 meeting and recommended approval.
FISCAL IMPACT STATEMENT
Program: SANDER Project
Recommended Proposal
Di rect Cost
I ndi rect Cost
1981-82
$65,153
-0-
$65,153
4,833
60,320
1982-83
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
-0-
TOTAL COST
EARNED REVENUE
NET COUN~ COST
Amount Budgeted for
this proposal:
Amount of Added
Funds
$65,153 Requested: $ -0-
Total Program
Appropriation:
Source of
$531,773 Added Funds: N/ A
REMARKS: The proposed total of $65,153 includes $60,320 for amendments to
existing contracts for additional public information and EIR services ($45,270)
and additional resource recycling services ($15,050) required by the recent
designation of Chula Vista--as the principal project site. The remaining $4833
is 'for a technical evaluation tour of sol id waste-to-energy facil ities in
Chicago, 'IL and Pinellas, FL for three elected officials from the City of
Chula Vista, one SANDER Authority Board member from the City of San Diego
Council, the Chairman of the SANDER Authority Board, and one member of the
SANDER Project staff.
B-51 STATEMENT: The costs and related State revenue for the technical evaluation
tour are needed for the planning and development of the SANDER Project. This
tour will be an important element in the EIR process. The alternative to using
State funds would be 100% net County cost. The proposed SANDER facility to process
solid waste into energy will process 18% of the solid waste in the County and will
serve the populations of the cities of San Diego, Chula Vista, Coronado, and
National City, an4 portions of the unincorporated area. This facility will meet
1?-/!!f6f
, '. - ,.
..~.." ..
-..~.. .
~;.:...; ,:~';:;t';i : ."
6-51 STATEMENT (CONT'D);
,
the public n~d to develop and implement an alternative method to solid
waste disposal other than the current use of landfills. The SANDER Project
is a joint venture of the County and the City of San Diego. There is no other
agency which would provide this service at this time.
I certify that if City funding were not available, the recommended expenditures
would still be worthy of Coun~y funds:
1- )0169
FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH PRIVATE CONSULTANT
CONTRACT NUMBER 16198-S0::;oE d. ODE:
FOR ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT ,
,
AND PUBLIC.INFORMATJ:ON:':SERVICES
FOR THE
SAN DIEGO ENERGY RECOVERY (SANDER) PROJECT
This First Amendment to the Agreement is entered into this /3 c4. day
. of (ffkL . 1982. by and between the County of San Diego..a political
subdiv sion of the State of California hereinafter called "County" and the
. ,
firm of New Horizons Planning consultants, Inc., place of business at
1850 Fifth Avenue, San Diego, CA 92101, hereinafter called "Advisor".
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS, the County has engaged :an advisor to provide public
information advisory services for the San Diego Energy Recovery (SANDER)
,
Project; and
WHEREAS. the City of San Diego and the county have fonned a SANDER
Joint Powers Authority assisted by County staff. to provide a means of
. coordinating all aspects of the project; and
WHEREAS; it has. been determined by the governing Board of the SANDER
Authority that additional public information and environmental impact report
services related to the Chula Vista site are required and that this was not
contemplated in the original contract; and
WHEREAS. it has been determined that an extent ion of 20 months is
required to perform the additional work; and
WHEREAS, the County and the Advisor have negotiated a fee for said
additional work;
NOW, THEREFORE. it is agreed as follows:
1. In addition to the fee prov~ded in the contract the additional
amount of $45,270 will be paid to the Advisor by the County for the work
described in Exhibit "A-1" entitled First Amendment Scope of Work.
f~ /1'/1/9
2. The fee paid
on a firm fixed price
for the work outlined in Exhibit "A-1" shall be
.
compensation basis as outlined in Exhibit "B-1".
3. The original contract fee of $30,000 shall be increased by the
above mentioned amount of $45,270 for a new maximum contract fee of $75,270.
4. The time required to complete the work in the original contract
and the First Amendment is extended 20 months, or through February 8, 1984.
5. All other terms and provisions of the original agreement of
July 22, 1980 will remain unchanged and in full force and effect.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties have caused this Amendment to be
executed on the date first above written.
.
NEW HORIZONS PLANNING CONSULTANTS, INC.
Ey, 7;Jw,..JJ 1---'~
TY OF SAN DIEGO
e" /';6&n~
Clerk of the Board of Supervisor
By:
~pro'l&d end/or AuIllorized by Board
of Supervisors, County of San D1ego
APR 13 1982 #~y
i4"/;1IJf1~
Clerk of the Board of S';\ltrvlsor
l.~',;-:;'i~"j :J
Civil Sor';icJ C;;1:T',i;;;sion
3'a.
.L
",; \') . ,._~::,..: i 1
,
t.
[,.(JIJ.
,
-#
, ~ -J"'~
If- jiIJ'if
-?-
EXHIBIT A-I
FIRST AMENDMENT SCOPE OF WORK
FOR ADVISORY SERVICES
WITH
NEW HORIZONS PLANNING CONSULTANTS ,
,
FOR TILE
SAN DIEGO ENERGY RECOVERY PROJECT
The Chula Vista City Council has stated their interest in siting the
SANDER Project in the Chula Vista community. Prior to any final decision by
the Chula Vista. City C~uncil, a-report on the environmental impacts .of the
Project at the site in Chula Vista (Site 5) accompanied by an extensive public
information program must be prepared. Site 5 was not analyzed in the origina~
SANDER draft environmental impact report (EIR), nor has the Chula Vista
community specifically been included i~ the public information program.
In order to accomplish this additional work, the County wishes to amend
County Contract #16198-5850 to include the following:
.
. TASK 1. Analyze Project Impacts, Develop. Mitigation Measures
.
A; Baseline environmental inventory data for Site 5 will be
developed using the generic SANDER Project, other possible
components and other technologies and components for use in
analyzing the potential impacts of the Project at Site 5.
Where .the. impacts of "other technologies and- components". do
not differ from the original draft EIR a reference to the
original document will be. used.
B. Develop mitigation measures to minimize the environmental
impacts of the Project at.the Site 5 location. Where
necessary evaluate the potential adverse effects of the
mitigation measures.
c. The consultant will incorporate the information on several
impact categories supplied by SANDER staff into the document
on the Chula Vista Site.
D. Items A & B will apply to each of the impact categories
listed below:
(1) Meteorology and Air Quality
Based on the generic worst case alr quality sections
in the original draft ErR, the Consultant will review
f(---/(){bf
. .
R- /tJf61
.
and summarize- the emissions) the regulatory setting
permits required etc. . Consultant will discuss
.-
the non criteria pollutants resulting from burning
solid wa9te and'using'various data including'SANDER
waste analysis results.
Based on Air Pollution Control District monitoring
data the setting and baseline data will be described.
New air modeling will be done for Site 5. Data will
be developed in cooperation with SANDER staff. The
consultant will determine the total effect of SANDER
with the 'adjacent power plant'and other sources.
Air pollutant'emissions from vehicle miles traveled (VMT)
for waste collection and disposal in the SANDER waste-
shed will be compared to related emissons for the
'No-Project alternative and the project at Site I and
Site 6. Mitigation measures will be presented.
(2)
Traffic and Circulation
For the local roadway system in the area of Site 5, the
consultant will estimate project-generated traffic
volumes andspeeds and determine impacts on traffic
levels of service during peak periods for local traffic.
Local access and traffic impacts will be examined.
Traffic data will be used in noise, air quality, and
energy consumption analysis. Circulation routes for
waste collection and disposal vehicles will be traced
through the community of Chula Vista as well as the
adjacent communities. Effects on local roads and
freeway interchnages will be discussed.
(3) Noise
Site 5 sensitive receptors will be identified and
calculations made of existing noise levels in the project
area. Specific noise effects of project and project
generated traffic at the Chula Vista will be evaluated.
(4) Health, Safety and Odor
Consultant will thoroughly discuss health, safety and
~7_ jti!{;f
odor impacts from the project at Site 5.
(5)
Public Services
Availability of required pubic
demands for such services will
"
serv~ces and project
be discussed.
(6) Visual
Visual characteristics of the site and the impact on
nearby and distant views, especially from nearby road-
ways and" local residential areas, will be discussed
with emphasis on perception of Chula Vista residents.
(7) Energy
A comparative analysis of energy use and energy
production will be presented for the site. The analysis
will present. and discuss differences in energy balance
resulting from the use qf a more southerly sit~J Site ?t
as compared to Site 1.
(8) Land Use
Existing land use in the surrounding area will be pre-
sented and discussed. Relationship of the proposed
project to existing Chula Vista land use plans and
zoning requirements will be examined in detail and
presented. Land use issues related to the local Coastal
Plan and Coastal Commission jurisdiction will be dis-
cussed.
(9) Community Characteristics
To be provided by SANDER staff.
(10) Economic and Fiscal Aspects
The economic nnd fiscal aspects of the alternative
financial arrangements for the Chula Vista site will
be briefly described and discussed. SANDER management
will be the source of required information. Alternative
financing means will be compared.
(ll) Growth
Consultant will discuss growth impacts on Chula Vista
which results from the construction of the proposed
project.
(12) Geology, Soils and' Seismicity "
To be p~ovided by SANDER staff.
(13) Disposal of Residuals
Consultant'will discuss the impact of residual disposal
as it relates to Site 5. Consultant will update
information on the classification and uses of ash from
the SANDER Plant~
(14) Resources
Consultant will discuss impact on the water supply in
connection with SANDER at Site 5 including alternatives
for water usage. The SDG&E plant, the potential for
steam customers and return of condensate will be
analyzed.
An update of the recycling element of the SANDER project
will be included with special reference to Site 5.
(15) Hydrology and Water Quality
Hydrologic conditions of Site 5 will be described and
hydrologic impacts evaluated. Po~entials for alternative
water effluent discharges will be discussed, with
particular emphasis on interaction5 with existing near-
by SDG&E power plant.
(16) Vegetation and Wild1ife
To be provided by SANDER staff.
(17) Community Attitudes
To be provided by SANDER staff.
(18) Archeology
To be provided by SANDER staff.
TASK 2. The consultant'will manage and direct the work and preparation
'of the addition to the draft ErR for Site 5 to the satisfaction
of the SANDER Project Director.
TASK 3. The consultant will attend two public meetings or hearing on the
addition to the draft ErR for Site 5.
1(- / (Jlbf
TASK 4. The addition to the draft ErR for Site 5 will incorporate the
first three sections. of the original draft ErR as well as a
,
summary of mitigation measures, reports an~persons consulted,
bibliography. Notes from public hearings held and glossary.
The addition to the draft ErR shall be organized as a clear,
concise and. readable document~ Other sections of the original
draft ErR will be incorporated by reference when appropriate.
TASK 5. The Consultant. will submit an administrative draft of the Site 5
analyses and relevant sections of the addition to the Draft ErR
on or before June 3D, 1982 for review by SANDER staff, City of
Chula Vista Planning Dept. staff and others.
TASK 6. The Consultant will provide the following public . information
services:
A. Actively and frequently participate with the project management
team in all aspects of the project which may impact the public
information function, including attending staff meetings. The
Consultant shall, if requested by project staff, attend 12 staff
meetings. Such meetings shall be in addition to any meetings
.required for the development of media releases, community
meetings, mailing lists or the development of other displays.
B. Attend two large public meetings, including public hearings
on the SANDER Project, if so requested by project staff.
Consultant will organize three regular.publlc meetins in the
Chula Vista area. The Consultant will be responsible for a
summary of three of these meetings. Advisor shall not be
responsible for any room rental costs.
C. Revise the current "Trash to Energy" brochure. This task shall
include revising the site sections, financial aspects, and
other wording as may be requested by project staff. Consultant
will be responsible for production and the County will be
responsible for printing.. This task does not include new
graphics. This task will also include updating the one page
fact sheet on the SANDER Project on a bi-monthly basis.
D. Assist the project management team with media contacts,
including preparation of media releases and public service
If-Itiffl
announcements (PSAs). The advisor shall contact local community-
based media to encourage feature stories on all aspects of the
Project, including financial. Keep SANDER staff informed re-
"
garding'all media contacts.
.E. Update the mailing list of appropriate organizations and
individuals to receive information concerning SANDER with a
special concentration on the City of Chula Vista and surrounding
area.
F. Advisor shall develop two, folded, four-page, camera-ready
newsletters in a similar format to the "Solid Waste Report." The
County will pay the cost of printing and distribution.
G. The Consultant will be responsible for updating the media kit
on SANDER, including photographs.
H. The Advisor shall develop a m~n~mum of five visual" displays
including the Chula Vista site and such other information a~
'may be requested by Project staff.
I. The Consultant shall coordinate with City of Chula Vista and
other community and business groups in their on-going efforts to
build the image of the community.
TASK 7. The Consultant will be responsible for replying to comments received
from the public and governmental agencies on the addition to the
Draft ElR for Site 5 unless otherwise directed by SANDER staff.
When the comments have been received at the end of public review
period, the Consultant will submit to the SANDER Project Director, an
estimate of the time and cost for answering the comments. No work
will be undertaken on this task until authorized by the SANDER Project
Director.
The County will be responsible for:
A. Printing and distributing the final verSion of the addition to
the ElR.
B. Providing Notice of Preparation and Notice of Completion.
C. Legal Notices
1- /t'fbf
. .
EXHIBIT .B-1
FIRST AMEN~ENT FOR ADVISORY SERVICES
WITH
NEW HORIZONS PLANNING CONSULTANTS "
FOR THE
SAN DIEGO ENERGY RECOVERY PROJECT
BASIS OF COMPENSATION
The Consultant agrees to perform the services listed in Exhibit A-1 in
accordance with the compensation method described, in this Exhibit.
1. Planned Services
Tasks 1-6 - Basis of compensation shall be a fixed fee of $33,270.
2. Special Services
.
The work effort in some tasks (i.e. Task 7) may not be fully scoped
.
at this time. Allowance of $12,000 is established for these services.
The Consultant and the SANDER Project Director shall mutually agree
on the service to be performed and the amount of co~pensation. The
Director shall authorize the Consultant to proceed and payment will be
made from ' the Special Services allowance.. Payment may be made on an
hourly, fixed fee or cost reimbursement basis.
The total compensation paid from Special Services shall not exceed
the established allowance.
The Consultant shall submit monthly billings with the following
information:
1) Task(s) performed during billing ,period with a percent of total
scope assigned to each task.
2) Percent of task completed in previous billing period.
3) Percent of task completed in current billing period.
4) Percent of total billed to date and total dollar value of the
task billed to date.
5) List of persons who worked on 'the tasks during the billing period.
6) List of sub-consultants who worked on the addition to the draft EIR
during the billing period including a surrmary of what work they
performed during the billing period.
7) A brief one page report on the work accomplished during the billing
period.
Il- /t?j?ff
<.__,,~. _. .. .~. ._. ,,,,_.. h.._...._...~__. __._' _ ~...____
,
.~
THIRD
AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH PRIVATE CONSULTANT
CONTRACT NUMBER 15162-~ ..200"-
FOR RESOURCE RECOVERY SERVICES
FOR
SAN DIEGO ENERGY RECOVERY (SANDER) PROJECT
"
This Third
of Uf/1AL
subdivision of the
Amendment to the Agreement is entered into this
.I"'? pt.- day
, 1982, by and between the County of San Diego, ~ political
State of California hereinafter called "County" and the firm
of Ecology Centre, Inc., having an office and place of business at 340 Kalmia
Street, San Diego, CA 92103, hereinafter called "Consultant".
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS~ the County has engaged a consultant to provide resource recovery
services for the San Diego Energy Recovery (SANDER) Project; and
I...
WHEREAS, the City of San Diego and the County have formed a SANDER
'Joint Powers Authority assisted 'by County staff, to provide a means of
coordinating all aspects of the project; and
WHEREAS"it has been determined by the governing Board of the SANDER
Authority that additional work not contemplated in the original contract is
needed and an extension.of 16 months is required; and
WHEREAS, the County and the Consultant have negotiated a fee for
said additional work;
NOW, THEREFORE, it is agreed as follows:
I. In addition to the fee provided in the contract and prior amendments,
the additipnal amount of $15,050 will be paid to the Consultant by the County
for the work described in Exhibit "A-3" entitled Third Amendment Scope of Work.
f~ /tJfbf
EXHIBIT A-3
THIRD AMENDMENT-SCOPE OF WORK
FOR
SAN DIEGO ECOLOG'(CENTRE
,
,
The San Diego Energy Recovery (SANDER) Project requires, additional services
in the area of developing markets for recyclable items and implementation of
a public information program to stimulate public participation in recycling
in the SANDER wasteshed.
This amendment will focus on the Chula Vista community since the City Council
of Chula Vista has expressed interest in siting SANDER in Chula Vista.
The County wishes continued support of San Diego Ecology Centre and wishes to
amend County Contract #15162-5850-E to provide for the following services and
to extend this contract until December 31, 1983.
The following tasks shall be performed by the San Diego Ecology Centre consultants
over a sixteen month period.
Task 1: In the first week of the study a timetable will be given to the
Project Director showing the order and timing of the different tasks.
Work Output: Time Schedule
Task 2: All recycling centers within the newly revised wasteshed will be
contacted by letter and phone to familiarize them with the project
and to incorporate their activities into the planning of the project.
Previous list of centers will be updated.
Work Output: List of centers newly included in the project's
revised wasteshed and summary of respondants questions and
concerns. Revised and updated list of centers in wasteshed.
Task 3: Meetings between County staff and 'consultants and concerned parties and
agencies will be held to define the issues of ownership and control of
recyclable materials. Based on the outcome of these meetings a
formalized set of procedures will be devised to handle any questions
of access to recyclable materials.
Work Output: Summary of meetings and agreed upon set(s) of procedures.
Task 4: Write sections on recycling for all of the following project documents:
1) EIR, 2) RFP, and 3) Concept Paper. Attendance at major EIR hearings
and presentations where the Project Director deems appropriate.
Work Output: Written sections of EIR, RFP and Concept Paper.
Meeting attendance.
1- /lfbtj
~
Exhibit A-3
,
Identification and contact with all firms in the'revised wasteshed
that have wastes that could potentially cause problems with regards
to explosions and/or air emissions. After examination and comparisons
of the subject wastes, make a determination as to the potential for a
waste exchange or similar entity. Two firms who specialize in this
field will be consulted with once the target materials are identified.
Work Output: List of identified special waste and summary of
potential for implementation of waste exchange activity.
Task 6: Writing of final summary report for Tasks 1 thru 5.
Task 5:
Work Output: Final summary report of Tasks 1 thru 5.
Task 7: Develop a flyer to be included in the City of San Diego water utility
bills providing information on the availability of recycling centers
and the reasons for recycling, emphasizing the connection with the
SANDER Project.
Work Output: Flyers: 100,000, 4"x 7" folded, printed on one side, to
be stuffed in water utility billings, typesetting, camera work and
graphics.
Task 8: Develop a comprehensive recycling press campaign incorporating eight
press releases, five public service announcements (for t.v. and radio),
and two press conferences which will highlight various aspects of
recycling, maintain a continuous level of awareness and information
about reyccling in the community, and-reach segments of the population
not previously involved in recycling.
Work Output: 1) Issue eight press reieases, printin9, postage,
mailing labels, envelopes to a mailing list of 250; 2) Issue five
written public service announcements, printing, postage, mailing
labels, and envelopes to a mailing-list of 35; 3) Hold two press
conferences, materials and invitations.
Task 9: Organize a cooperative recycling display advertising section in a
local newspaper among the industry representatives willing to take
part in the press campaign noted in Task 8.
Work Output: One or more newspaper advertisements in a local paper,
_ graph i cs and pas teup. (Cos t of ad to be borne by indus try. )
Task 10: Media and public relations consulting services for flyer, press
campaign and advertising for recycling centers.
Work Output: 1) Design and coordinate printing of the flyer;
2) Plan and implement the press campaign; 3) Write copy, calendar and
provide press follow-up; 4) Organize and facilitate press conferences;
5) Coordinate industry sponsors in a cooperative advertising buy.
f? - /i/f Fj
",
_ _ ___~____._.-<._ _____,__ _ "__.._m____. __ __L......_._~_._~._~~..,.. ._,' _.--....... ~__ __,.__ _.__ ....._._._..... ,'.n .._.,..~_,d.'~_............._;., "~'- '._._.._,.~._ '.. "_"_'
Exhibit A-3
Task 11: Manage and administration of the recycling info~ation program.
.
,
Work Output: 1) Development of w~jor themes and informational
basis for flyer, press campaign and advertising; 2) Coordination
with media and public relations consultant in detailed development
and design of flyer, press campaign and advertising; 3) Direct
and assist media and public relations consultant in coordination of
industry sponsors in cooperative advertising buy; 4) Mailings and
coorespondence; 5) Monthly status reports will be provided to support
invoice billings.
;/j- /ML>9
EXH IBIT B-3
COMPENSATION FOR SERVICES
,
"
The cost of providing the services enumerated in Exhibit B-3
shall not exceed a total of $15,050.
liIonthly progress payments for tasks performed by the San
Diego Ecology Centre will be made as follows:
Monthly progress payments will be made as follows: One month after
commencement of work under this Agreement and at the expiration of
each month of work thereafter, Consultant will certify the percentage
of. completion on a form acceptable to the Director. A partial payment
computed by multiplying the basic fee by this percentage shall then
become. due and payable, provided however, that not more than ninety
,
percent (90%) of the total fee will be paid during the performance of
this Agreement. The Consultant will also submit a report with the
invoice summarizing the work accomplished during the billing period.
If - /tJ F//j
SUMMARY
Overview of the Study Area - Chapter I
To develop an effective and comprehensive plan for the management of solid
wastes in the County, it was essential to identify those characteristics
which influence regional solid waste generation and disposal patterns. This
Chapter provides an introduction to the geographic, geopolitical and demo-
graphic makeup of the County.
Few major changes took place during this interim.
porated; the 1980 census established a population
projected, thus accounting for the 8% increase in
over 1977 projections.
Three cities were incor-
increase of 10% over that
the amount of trash buried
Significant changes in the amount of rainfall were experienced, thus lending
meteorologists to predict a shift to "wet years." There were also major
changes in air pollution control standards. The former is important because
of the potential impact to groundwater by landfill operations; the latter
impacts resource recovery projects.
Storage and Collection - Chapter II
On a day-to-day basis, storage and collection are the sol id waste management
functions which most immediately and directly affect the lives of the
region's residents. This Chapter describes and evaluates waste storage and
collection practices in the coastal region - which is the densely populated
western one third of San Diego County. Collection service throughout the
County appears to he satisfactory.
Waste Generation and Disposal - Chapter III
This Chapter ident ifies waste generat ion and disposal in the County. A fore-
cast of sol id waste volumes to the year 2000 is included as well as a review
11- /0167
-1-
of existing solid waste disposal facilities and their anticipated capaci-
ties.
The information in this Chapter builds on the Solid Waste Allocation Matrix
I, developed in the initial solid waste planning process.
Recoverable Resources - Chapter IV
Consumer discards which still have commercial value provide the feedstock for
a major industry in San Diego County. Secondary materials salvage activites
are basically a profit-motivated industry but they are also a practical
approach to the conservation of natural resources and energy.
The recyclable materials discussed in this Chapter are those which are con-
sidered to have the greatest potential for reuse. These include metals,
paper, textiles, plastics and glass. They are typically recovered at the
source or at intermediate transfer centers.
This Chapter differs from the following in that it focuses on smaller scale,
1 abor intens ive, less technical techniques.
Resource Recovery - Chapter V
This chapter discusses the other spectrum of resource recovery - the large scale,
higher technology facilities which convert part of the solid waste stream into
energy.
Three projects are discussed:
o The 200 ton per day El Cajon Resource Recovery Demonstration Facility
The Palomar Transfer Station
The 1200 ton per day San Diego Energy Recovery (SANDER) Project
1(-/tlf6fj
-2-
Interior Zone Management - Chapter VI
The solid waste management systems of San Diego County have been divided into
urban and interior regions. This Chapter is concerned with solid waste man-
agement in the interior region.
While encompassing about 65 percent of the County's land area, the interior
region has less than three percent of the population. Because of the sparce
population, area residents rely almost wholly upon County agencies for
services. Solid waste services presently consist of ten rural container
facilities and one small volume landfill.
The rural container sites are actually storage facilities. Under contract
with private handlers, these wastes are transported to County landfills.
Between 1976 and 1980, contract costs rose dramatically. In part, this
escalation reflected the closure of the Descanso landfill which serviced the
higher volume South portion of the Interior Zone. This added 26 miles to the
transportation costs for the solid waste generated in this region.
Funding alternatives for this region are also discussed.
Special Wastes - Chapter VII
Special wastes include automobile hulks, agricultural wastes, bulky items,
dead animals, se'dage sludge, street sweepings and tires. Individually, none
of these waste categories present major proble:ns ,in solid waste management at
the present time. Collectively, however, problems of substantial dimensions
could quiCkly arise if establ ished disposal procedures are not followed.
Current quantities and disposal practices are reviewed. Resource recovery
apport unites are also discussed.
f-ltJfb9
-3-
Hazardous Wastes - Chapter VIII
Recent State legislation has modified review and approval procedures for the
hazardous waste element of county solid waste management plans. The State
Department of Health Services has been designated as the review agency for
this element of the Plan and has issued guidelines accordingly.
This Chapter discusses the impact of RCRA, the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act of 1976, on hazardous waste management practices, including the
closure of the only Class I landfill in San Diego County.
A review of major legislative proposals, especially a siting study conducted
by the State Department of Health Services, is provided. The Emergency
Response Plan is also included for ease of reference.
Litter - Chapter IX
Litter is a special problem in solid waste management. It is trash which has
been carelessly discarded or accidentally scattered in places where it may be
visually offensive, ecologically harmful or hazardous to health and safety.
Of great assistance to local agencies in combating the growing litter problem
was the Litter Control, Recycling and Resource Recovery Act of 1980. This
legislation provided "pass-through" funding to cities and the County for
various litter clean-up and enforcement programs. Unfortunately, the program
was eliminated by the Legislature during 1981.
Financing and Orqanizational Development - Chapter X
This section of the Plan summarizes solid waste responsibilities and
financing practices within the San Diego region. It also includes alterna-
tive organizational and financing models which could be used to meet the
region's solid waste needs.
tP-J{)J69
-4-
Because of recent developments in State legislation limiting the financing
capabilities of local government, no signficiant changes in the solid waste
organization are anticipated.
":>
The exception to this is the SANDER Project, a joint powers agreement between
the City and County of San Diego. It is considering a public-private mix for
ownership and operation of this large resource recovery facility.
Contingency Planning - Chapter XI
In order to protect the public health and preserve the environment, it is
essential that solid Vlaste services not be interrupted. If waste removal is
not done on a regular and timely basis, refuse accumulates and \,ill become a
potential health hazard. If disposal operations are interrupted, haulers are
unable to dis~harge their loads and collection services must be suspended.
This Chapter reviews contingency planning for both labor related stoppages
and natur1l di sasters.
Local Enforcement Agencies - Chapter XII
During development of the Plan, legislation was enacted requiring designation
of Local Enforcement Agencies (LEAs) for health and non-health related solid
waste matters.
The State Sol id \,aste I~anagement Board has required designated LEAs to
develop enforcement programs and to submit them to the State for review. The
State also requires that these LEA Programs be included in this Plan.
In San Diego County, most agencies designated themselves for non-health
related matters. The County Department of Health Services was designated by
all agencies but one for health related matters.
The State is the designated
matters for the City of San
LEA for both non-health and health related
Diego.
f- /t?!J9
-5-
Co 11 ect i on and
Storage:
Disposal:
Recover ab 1 e
Resources:
Resource
Recovery:
Interior Zone:
Special Wastes:
Hazardous
\.ias tes :
11- /jf~f
MAJOR CONCLUSIONS
Current practices are satisfactory. The combination of
public and private service providers has resulted in an
efficient and effective collection system.
Adequate disposal facilities exist for current solid waste
volumes. However, long range planning, acquisition and
completed fill maintenance have been inadequately con-
sidered.
Current levels of recycling must be increased. Public
access to recycling centers, information and education
programs and new markets for recovered materials must be
encoUl'aged.
The SANDER Project is a vital component of a solid waste
system which does not rely solely on landfilling. Its
continued support is critical to avoid a garbage crisis by
the end of this century.
Other recovery projects in the North and East County are
also necessary.
Current efforts to decrease the cost of this transportation
system must be continued. Alternative funding mechanisms
and opportunites for resource recovery must be pursued.
Handling practices for these special wastes are adequate.
Opportunites for recycling, waste exchange and recovery
must be investigated.
This sensitive field requires special attention. Without
adequate tracking, this component of the waste stream can
pose a serious threat to the public health and safety.
-6-
Litter:
Finance and
Organization:
Contingency
Planning:
1- /~,f6f
Adequate handling facilities, volume reduction, recycling,
waste exchanging and recovery must be provided.
The newly created Hazardous Task Force will develop a com-
prehensive management program from cradle-to-grave.
San Diego County is an attractive tourist area. In order
to maintain its attractiveness, litter cannot be allowed to
become a problem. However, fiscal constraints on local
governments threaten existing levels of abatement and
education. The public and private industry must realize
their responsibility to avoid as well as abate this
nuisance. Exoansion of "Workfare," honor camp and other
available work force programs is necessary.
Funding constraints have generally impacted general fund
revenues ava 11 ab Ie for so 1 i d waste act i v ites . User fees,
revenue from recovery activites and other sources of
funding have become increasingly more important. Long
range funding programs for resource recovery, operations,
future facility acquisition and maintenance must be
developed and implemented.
Emergency and disaster planning contingencies must be
maintained.
-7-