The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2007/06/12 Item 1 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT 06/12/2007 Item--L- ITEM TITLE: RESOLUTION ACCEPTING A $50,000 GRANT FROM THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO AND AUTIlORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. CITY ENGINEER '7J ~ INTERIM CITY MANAGER II SUBMITTED BY: REVIEWED BY: 4/5TIIS VOTE: YES D NO ~ BACKGROUND On April 17, 2007, the County of San Diego approved a COImnunity Project award of $50,000 to the City of Chula Vista in order to provide for preliminary engineering services for the J Street to Stella Street segment of the Bayshore Bikeway. Tonight's action accepts the funds and authorizes City staff to execute the agreement required by the County. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is not a "Project" as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines at this time because it involves only the acceptance of a grant and authorization to proceed with engineering and environmental studies for the project; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060 (c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines the activity is not subject to CEQA. Once the project has been fully defined, environmental review will be required and a CEQA determination completed. RECOMMENDATION That Council approve the Resolution accepting a $50,000 grant from the County of San Diego and authorizing the City Manager to execute an Agreement with the County of San Diego. BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Not applicable. DISCUSSION On April 17, 2007, the County of San Diego Board of Supervisors approved several Community Project awards recommended by Supervisor Greg Cox including $50,000 to the City of Chula Vista in order to provide for preliminary engineering services for the Bayshore Bikeway portion 1-1 06112/2007, ltemL Page 2 of 4 from J Street to Stella Street in Chula Vista. This $50,000 grant will supplement an anticipated $50,000 in City of Chula Vista TransNet funds proposed for this project in the Fiscal Year 2007/2008 Capital Improvement Program budget. The Bayshore Bikeway Working Group is chaired by County Supervisor Greg Cox and was established to promote improvements to the approximately 24-mile bikeway around San Diego Bay. It consists of an elected official from each of the Cities of Chula Vista, Coronado, Imperial Beach, National City, and San Diego, and from the County of San Diego. Council Member McCann has previously served on this working group; currently, Council Member Ramirez represents the City of Chula Vista. Working Group members also include the Metropolitan Transit System, the Port District, and a representative of the region's bicycling community. The Bayshore Bikeway consists often segments around the San Diego Bay (see Attachment 1). The southerly portion of Segment 6, all of Segment 7, and the northerly portion of Segment 8 are within the City of Chula Vista. The grant is to be put toward the portion of Segment 8 that is located within the City of Chula Vista ("Segment 8A"). The ultimate bike path segment along the Coronado Beltline Railroad right-of-way corridor and west of Bay Boulevard from Stella Street to Main Street is located within the city of San Diego and has been identified as Segment 8B. The interim bike lane alignment along Stella Street and West Frontage Road to Main Street is generally located within Chula Vista. Bayshore Bikeway Route Segments The SANDAG Bayshore Bikeway Plan breaks the bikeway into ten segments that can be summarized as follows: Segment 1: Ferry Landing to Seaport Village, within Port tidelands and subject to the redevelopment plans of the Port District. Segment 2: Convention Center Way to 28th Street is within tidelands, and within the City of San Diego between Harbor Drive on the east side and the trolley right-of-way, bridging the railroad tracks at the 10th Avenue Marine Terminal. Segment 3: Between 28th Street to 32nd Street, the path continues on the east side of Harbor Drive and likely will involve improvements to the parking areas that serve National Steel and Shipbuilding (NASSCD) employees. Segment 4: 32nd Street to Civic Center Drive transitions from the City of San Diego to National City. This segment includes alternate routes along either side of Harbor Drive between 32nd Street and the Naval Station Gate 7. Segment 5: Civic Center Drive to the existing bike path at 32nd Street in National City includes improvements that may involve Burlington Northern and Santa Fe (BNSF), and changes to the west side of Tidelands Avenue. Segment 6: From the bike path beginning at 32nd Street, across the Gordy Shields Bridge to E Street in Chula Vista, no major improvements are recommended for this section. 1-2 06/12/2007, Item~ Page 3 of 4 Segment 7: E Street to J Street in Chula Vista is primarily through the bayfront redevelopment area being planned by the San Diego Unified Port District and the City of Chula Vista. The recommended alignment is within the San Diego Gas and Electric (SDG&E) right-of-way where transmission lines are currently being undergrounded. Segment 8: J Street to Main Street where the proposed alignment is in the SDG&E right-of-way and in the Metropolitan Transit System's (MTS) Coronado Belt Line right-of-way. Segment 9: Main Street in Chula Vista to the City of Imperial Beach where the City of San Diego currently is developing the project through the salt works, and to the west where Imperial Beach would like to develop a bike path spur connecting to their beachfront. Segment 10: The existing bike path and route in Coronado connecting to the ferry landing does not require major improvements. Each segment represents a portion of the route that has some independent utility because it connects to an exiting bike path or it serves significant land uses. Some segments will be easier to implement than others due to cost and right-of-way constraints. Consequently, the Working Group has developed implementation priorities to facilitate a logical development of the planned improvements. With this in mind, the Working Group would like to commence the preliminary environmental assessment and preliminary engineering phase of work on Segment 8 (see Attachment 2). Segment 7 is affected by the Bayfront Redevelopment project and this segment cannot proceed at this time. The total estimated cost for Segment 8A is $1.2 million as shown in the attached cost estimate (see Attachment 3). Per a letter dated May 10, 2007, the County of San Diego grant requires the City of Chula Vista to execute a grant agreement document (see Attachments 4 and 5). The grant funds must be expended within twelve months of receipt. Once this phase of work is underway and nears completion, it is expected that SANDAG will then prioritize this project for regional bicycle funding sources. This phase of work will analyze environmental issues, revise the cost estimate and determine the project scope for construction. DECISION MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council and has found a conflict exists, in that Council Member Ramirez has property holdings within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property, which is the subject of this action. FISCAL IMPACT There is no impact to the City's General Fund as a result of this action. This $50,000 in County grant funds and an additional $50,000 in TransNet funds are proposed as project STL337 "Bayshore Bikeway" in the Fiscal Year 2007/2008 Capital Improvement Program. These funds will be appropriated with approval of the Fiscal Year 2007/2008 Capital Improvement Program budget. The $50,000 in TransNet funds for this project were included within the City's Fiscal Year 2007/2008 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP) approved by City Council on April 17,2007 per Resolution 2007-111. The SANDAG RTIP is attached (see Attachment 6). 1-3 ATTACHMENTS 06/1212007, Item f Page 4 of 4 1. SANDAG key to Bayshore Bikeway Study Segments (Fig. 5-1 through 5-8) 2. Bayshore Bikeway Working Group Agenda dated April 5, 2007. 3. SANDAG Report for Segment "8A" J Street to Stella Street dated March 9,2007. 4. County of San Diego letter dated May 10, 2007. 5. County of San Diego Standard Grant Agreement between the County of San Diego and City of Chula Vista. 6. SANDAG 2006 Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTlP) Draft Amendment #6 dated 5/25/07. (File: STL337) J:\EngineerIAGENDA\CAS2007l06-12-07\Revised Bayshore Bikeway Grant.doc 1-4 ATTACHMENT I .U.'S."NaVal AirSh!Iiil~ I Segment 10 I p.lcific Ocean - Streams Bikeways - Bike Path Bike Lane - On-Street Bika Route ---- Ferry Connection BAYSHORE BIKEWAY Bike Patl1 On-Street Bike Lane/Route ~ o 3,900 7,800 Fill FIGURE DESCRiPTION 5-1 Key to Bayshore Bikeway Study Segments Existing Bike Path IIIIIIIIlII Broadway Pier Ferry connection to Coronado Existing On-Street Bike lane/Bike Route Proposed New Bike Path Alignment - Old Police Headquarters Planned for redevelopment, recommended Bikeway will extend through parking area (specific path alignment to be coordinated with site redevelopment plans) Seaport Village Parking Some bicyclists currently ride informal route through parking areas to bypass prohibited promenade FIGURE Broadway Pier to Convention Center STUDY SEGMENT 5-2 1. .1>. 1 ..... Convention Way Recommended Bikeway path along west side of Convention Way, a low traffic roadway providing access to convention center loading docks FIGURE San Diego conv"c!:~~ Center to STUDY SEGMENTS 5-3 National ity imit Z and 3 Naval Station Frontage West Side Bikeway path alignment utilizes unpaved shoulder area adjacent 10 Naval Station. Will require undergroundlng utility poles, potentially shifting Navy fence for wider trailllanscaping .J BNSF ROW Use of BNSF ROW for Bikeway path is option for more direct connection to lldelands Avenue, but need to address railroad opera.tional Issues Gordy Shields Bridge ExIsting bike/pad bridge over Sweetwater Channel, extends from east terminus of 32nd St. In National City 10 E Street in ChulaVlsta FIGURE National City limits to STUDY SEGMENTS 5-4 Sweetwa:er River 4 and 5 1- Existin!l Btkl! Path _ Existin!lOn-StrI!l!t Bikl! LaneJBikl! Routl! Proposl!dNl!w Bikl! Path Alilnml!nt - Chula Vista H.rbor Spur Trail Optlonallrail alignment through Chu[a Vista Bayfront area would provide connection 10 Herbor area. Specific alignment details would be determined as part of Bayfront Area redevelopment FIGURE sweetwat~ !~er to STUDY SEGMENTS 5-5 Marina rk ay 6 and 7 ExistlllfBikePath _ ExistfnsOn.Street Bike LanelBiI(e Route Pl'tlposedN~ Bike Path AliJllment Current Bike Path Pl'tljects -- South Limit of Undergrounding The Moss Street alignment west of 1-5 Is the south 6mit of the SDG&E undergroundlng project South of here, the Bikeway path route will run adjacent to Bay Blvd., shifting to the east side of Coronado Beltline ROW. Crossing of RR to occur at existing service road along Moss Street alfgnmenl Coronado aelOlne ROW Historic Coronado BelUlna RailrQad ROW Is owned by MTS and presents opportunity for Class I path alignment. Path would be setback from tracks and not preclude future use of Beltllne for rail service. Current Project Class I segment currently under development, linking Main Street to existing Silver Strand Bike Peth FIGURE SEGMENT 5-6 Marina Parkway to Main Street, Chula Vista 8 1-10 . . . "ll~ ~t ~5 .~ oJ! U~ ~ . H ~.t ~~ I ~ .l! .l! '" i!' 'Ii .ll . li~ ,li.l! 'i! d~ I~ ~~ I ! ~.- z<! ~-:e ~~ ~~ ~,-,,-.~~,?:~~t~.:~.' > . g'A "O.!!~ Ii c.>...Q III 5i ~ ~ 2"~ .2-ol\fe.s~~'5"i5c a..3 OltIJC/J"iI Q.o:lI o w..5 ~ 11;= >,1:l() .c.!!Jl:ZC:>iC"" ~~ ai~i~3ffi~ ~~.s.!~Ill=i~1& :]1 llCD""~o ell ~ g' i ~~~iIi~~ ~=1 :s"'e~i.s![5 _'_ ."i....., ~~Hig ~~'g~ ;,:~1z.l.' itS gi~~6~ ~<<J1ii ~"', Q, l:! CD ,c.c ~,' E! c. E:;.s rs Ie ~ "....-'-""""_'......, I- Q ~ri: CD """ . ....~ tIJ m:5 i Jl;,'t""":".~L. -] (;j 0" j S'- :5~c:~~i .!l;~ ~~ E!e. g~=5U .!l.!l:J~a:I.c> ::I~.!!tnc.."5l::a &!~!ii.s~8<1l !'E~""I .s 5r ~ In . fI1'l'~I,g:~ ~ c 8= ojC/J ell ~:::I o~-g~liiEla~ D1= CIl CD.2 iir.c u c 11:1- :> - U:I "5i!" :;il-;;<CI)!DliI<V 'iiic;~E.!e0'= lIJ<u~.9jjj ~O~ .... z ~ '" ~'" > c => .... ~ ","'" ~~ .~ ~ > 0> ",-" -SiXi ""''t) u" . '" tb 0>'" b a; '" > .~ ~ ::;:8 '" 0:,.... ~~ "- Existing Bike Path Coronado Ferry Terminal Ferry Connection to Downtown San Diego Continued from Segment 10A, at left FIGURE 5-8 Silver Strand to Coronado FerryTerminal SEGMENT 10 1-12 4O1 B Street, Suite BOO San Diego, 01 92101-4231 (619)699-1900 Fax (619) 699-1905 wwwsandag.org MEMBER AGfN0f5 Citiesof Canlbad CJwIa "'" C""",ado DelMar EICaJOfl frtdnitiJ5 EJ<:Ondido "-iJI a..d1 La Mesa LemonGrol<' NationafCity Oceanside - 5>r> Diego ~Mar(QS 5anfee Soi.w a..d1 "<I, ,nd County of 5>r> Diego ADVISORY MEMBERS fmperial CCtlflty California Department of Transportation Metropoli:an TransitSystem North County TransirDisrtkr United States DefJartm~fI( of Defense San Diego Unified Port Disrtict s.m Diego County WaterAulhority 5outfJ(>mG;tifotnia Tribal Chai/'f'ne('J's AwciariM _0 ATTACHMENT 2. MEETING NOnCE AND AGENDA BA VSHORE BIKEWAY WORKING GROUP The Bayshore Bikeway Working Group may take action on any item appearing on this agenda. Thursday, April 5, 2007 2:00 p.m. SANDAG, Conference Room 8A 401 B Street, Suite 800 San Diego, CA 92101-4231 Staff Contact: Stephan Vance (619) 699-1924 sva@sandag.org AGENDA HIGHLIGHTS . CHULA VISTA SEGMENT IMPLEMENTATION WESTERN SALT PROJECT STATUS REPORT SANDAG offices are accessible by public transit. Phone I-BOO-COMMUTE or see www.sdcommute.com for route information. In compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), SANDAG will accommodate persons who require assistance in order to participate in SANDAG meetings. If such assistance is required, please contact SANDAG at (619) 699-1900 at least 72 hours in advance of the meeting. To request this document or related reports in an alternative format, please call (619) 699-1900, (619) 699-1904 (TTY), or fax (619) 699-1905. 1-13 BAYSHORE BIKEWAY WORKING GROUP Thursday, April 5, 2007 ITEM # 1. INTRODUCTIONS 2. PUBLIC COMMENT AND COMMUNICATIONS +3. MINUTES OF THE DECEMBER 14,2006, MEETING 4. BAYSHORE BIKEWAY SIGN AND PAVEMENT MARKER PROJECTS The County of San Diego, through the office of Supervisor Cox, has provided SANDAG with $2,000 to purchase additional signs and pavement markers for the Bayshore Bikeway. Staff will provide a status repot on the project +5. CHULA VISTA SEGMENT IMPLEMENTATION Staff from the City of Chula Vista are pursuing funding to develop the next phase of the bikeway in Chula Vista. They have developed the attached rationale and cost estimate for the segment along Bay Boulevard from Stella Avenue north to J Street. +6. WESTERN SALT PROJECT STATUS REPORT The internal review of the draft environmental impact report by the City of San Diego has extended beyond the timeframe last reported to the Working Group by the project development team. A revised schedule provided by the consulting team (attached) shows a significant delay in the environmental approval process. An oral report will be provided by City of San Diego staff at the meeting on the impact of this delay and possible strategies for recovering time in the schedule, if any. 7. ADJOURN + next to an item indicates an attachment 2 1-14 RECOMMENDATION APPROVE INFORMATION INFORMATION! DISCUSSION INFORMATION ATTACHMENT 3 Bayshore Bikeway "Y' Street to Stella (Segment SA) March 9, 2007 Bacl.ground The Bayshore Bikeway Plan began in 1975 and is currently embodied in the March 17, 2006 plan approved by SANDAG's Bayshore Bikeway Working Group. The goal of the plan is to identify off-street bike path alignments for the entire 24-mile loop around the San Diego Bay. The concept is that each jurisdiction it traverses is responsible for the construction and maintenance of the Bikeway. The rationale for prioritizing this segment ("J" Street to Stella) is that the construction phasing of the Bayfront is largely from the north to the south. By pursuing this segment there is a belief that the entire Bayshore Bikeway through the City of Chula Vista will be constructed sooner. Securing funds for the design of this segment will help to realize the timing and alignment issues associated with this segment. Description ofthe segment from "J" Street to Stella This 6,670-foot segment (1.25 miles) would follow either the SDG&E utility corridor or the adjacent railroad right of way just west of Bay Boulevard (see attached). At the southerly end of this segment the facility would need to temporarily connect back onto Bay Boulevard. Ultimately the segment to the south of this segment is to be constructed by the City of San Diego. Justification of Need The Bayshore Bikeway is justified on a number of levels. On a transportation level, this facility is considered transpartatian demand management (TDM), that is to say it removes auto commuter trips from the transportation network at the pea!l usage times to allow the existing infrastructure to work more effectively. The facility also provides an incentive for bicycle trips, which generate less greenhouse gases. From a safety standpoint there have been 6 reported bike accidents on this segment of Bay Blvd. in the last 6 years. This facility would have prevented all but one of these accidents, where a bike crashed into a bike. Lastly, the project would have the potential to draw more commercial activity as bicyclists traverse through the City on their way around the loop. Cost Estimate The Segment cost is embedded in a larger cost estimate of $1.9 million. We are requesting the breakdown from SANDAG however, we believe tlle cost may range from $700 thousand to $1.5 million. We expect to refine this estimate by the end of March 2007. A large line item in the estimate is a $450,000 storm drain along Bay Blvd. that may be avoidable if the path is aligned further to the west. Additional large ticket items are the crossings of two major watercourses at ''Y' street and "L" street. We estimate the design cost for this segment to be $ I 00,000 however, there is environmental analysis required which may be as high as $100,000 (see attached). 7 1-15 f 52' f 35' " ~ t~[=i ~ ~L !~lP~J lIlS 1 _ _ _ R/W.-- _ _ -'::!-_"':::1 - ------ - -\ / EXISTING CROSS SECTION " _I "- 8' -: 5', '--13' 52' I, 35' " 16'~ 13'---, 4' ~9'-; 5','--14' cw;s 1 PA'Ili - ~ ~l I , I WSS/ : PARKING : BIKE : :_: IlUSlIlESS lRAvtI. lRAvtI. PARKlNG PARK LANE : LANE: INIE LANE :LANE: LANE ,. . I CORllNADO IllWlCIi RAlLRO.\D 0: \. PROP"'ED STORM DRAIN ~ t Ii!>-- il ~ ! PROPOSED LAYOUT FIGURE LOCATION FACING SECTION 5-22 SA Bay Boulevard North of Palomar 8 South 1-16 . t , t i , t ; ; . ; ; ; , . , . . . . . << . . ( ( I I I I I I I I I I I ~ ~$fi cr~.E~lf ..,~ ., - ~ - ... .~.~ ~ .. ~ I \ c- "" / / / <L 9 1-17 " it ~ ~ Cl oJ: Z - C3 ::) ~ I ~ 0 on ., I L-------l It iJ I iJ I I "'0 '''" I z"- it ~~ I iJ I "0 <ill! II ~w "," II ss .. iJ Ii " z i5 "' It sg] 4i ~!l 41 .. Ii I ffi~ - on , ~u; -. it .~ Ii :>!!! I jjjili "'0 ~ I ~ I c Ii I o~ a \ (!;J!' ::J: .. lEiS z ! I I 0 c \ ; ~ 41 i!i 41 I u ~ i!i 9 - I 41 ..l2 i!i ~ i!i 0 III !!J ... ~ ell it C!) 0 !!J on !!J I -L it I ,. 9~ AY~ - ~ BI:/CJHS.I. \1& I { it I II I 1;! ~ II I I II I I II I . I ~ ~ III z it ~ III 0 <C ~ .. w " I rn ill I .. \ I w 0: - it I ::J C'f Cl I .. ii: U, . 10 .. . 1-18 j; 0 :E 0 0 - 0 0 ~ .; 0 0 .; '" ... 0 .. '" - .. l; . i ::;; <> r:::;:;;:: ~ ~ 0 I 0 0 8 " .; 0 .. ~ N .., .. ~ ~. J.\j.i " c ~I .. 0 CJ '" {4\'i;! - " ~ ~ 2 ~ 10 " z c " .. 0 E u 0 .. E U '" E 0 E ~ 0 {'!. ~ '" n; '" ~ E U Q. .. .. .. ~ '" ;li 'e e - 0 0. (!) g 0 0 Km '" .; - 0 ~ "S iili: - .., C - '" ;; C .. ~ CJ .., 0 j; @ 0 ;;; .!9 ;; ::;; .. 0 C " 0 ~;ii 0; " c e U; 'U ~ '" ;;; ~ '" .. 0 -'! ~ ass: .9 2' .. :! .. .. .. ;; - I- 0. '" (; E Q. Q. Q. Q. .. '" e E l; :J :J :J 0. .c .. U; " ::;; "D "D "D i-UJ E - f:t .... .- -'! -'! -'! al ;:. 'E & & '0 0. :! .a 5 a: '" .. .. ... .. " ~ .. I ... c c E . .. 0 .. E " 0 .., e N '" .. 'S: " '" C .. W CJ .. 0 0 .. C 0 ;;; ;;; ~ . ~ .. iU' @, 0 .. "D "D ~ "D 0 1<: '0 0 0 0 , .. ~ ~ '" CJ N - 0 8 8 0 ;;; .. 8 .. " 0 0 C ci ci ci 0 " .. 0 0 ~ :il .. S E "D ~ '" c;, 0 E .. .. .. .. ~ c -'! .~ a: :! ~ ... '" - n; C " .. 0 .. E ti .. .. C " 2 ;ii E C e '" ;;; i:; .. .. '5 'j " C ill z " c .. E w CJ 0 0 '" '" EM 0 .. l'IO .. Ul I- Ul' .c + tir- '" .!!.ili N ... 1 1 e1ii o.CJ 1-19 City of Chula Vista GENERAL SERVICES DEPARTMENT/PROJECT DESIGN DIVISION COST ESTIMATE Project Number: DATE: PREPARED BY: CHECKED BY: OIY Of OUA VISI;\ Project Title: Bayshore Bikeway Segment SA (J 5t to Stella) Adler Description Unit Amount Price Pre-Project 1 Preliminarv Environmental Assessment 1 LS $ 50,000 $ 50,000 2 Preliminarv Enoineerino 1 LS $ 50,000 $ 50 000 Subtotal: $ 100,000 Hard costs I 1 Bikeway Excavation I Mobiiization 2,000 CY $ 20 $ 40,000 2 AC bikeway (2" (ci) 10' wide 6,300 iona) 63,000 SF $ 1.50 $ 94,500 . 3 Aoo. Base bikewav (6" (ci) 14' wide 6,300 lona) 88,200 SF $ 1.70 $ 149,940 . 4 Prefabricated Bridcle across J SI. channel 1 EA $ 135,000 $ 135,000 5 8' Retainino wall (ci) Teleoraoh Canvon Channel 800 SF $ 75 $ 60,000 ' 6 Sionage 15 EA $ 400 $ 6,000 7 Fencinn 1 LS $ 15,000 $ 15,000 B Stripina 1 LS $ 25.000 $ 25,000 . B Traffic control 1 LS $ 10,000 $ 10,000 ~ 10 NPDES 1 LS $ 25,000 $ 25,000 1 - Subtotal: $ 560,440 - ContinQency @25' $ 140,110 - Subtotal Hard Costs $ 700,550 Soft Costs 1 Rinht of wav I easement 2AC $ 20,000 $ 40,000 2 Final Environmental Document 1 LS $ 100,000 $ 100,000 3 Mitioation lands 1 LS $ 100,000 $ 100,000 4 Traffic control 1 LS $ 8,000 $ 8,000 5 MTS / Rail crossinn nermittina 1 LS $ 10,000 $ 10,000 i 6 Desinn Ennineerina @ Survev 1 LS $ 80,000 $ 80,000 7 Inspection 1 LS $ 25,000 $ 25,000 B Staff time for Port and costal Commission processino 1 LS $ 80,000 $ 80,000 Subtotal: $ 443,000 TOTAL: $ 1,243,550 Notes Reference: March 17, 2006 SANDAG Bayshore Bikeway Plan The major effort of the pre project work is to understand any environmental impacts and easement issues. 12 1-20 l:l N N N i)i ~ N N ~ ~ ;; ;; " <> <> ;: ~ " :: Q = = ~ = ~ ~ ~ N - 6 = ~ ~ ~ N ~ , ~ .~ i , " " " ~ ~ if ~ ~ ~ ! 'I! 'I! 'I! i " z I " ~ f ~ ~ '" " '" !f if " ~ :l " f -< ~ ~ il' '" c :l " i ~ . f. m . 'I! '" m '" 'I! i . 'I! m ~I ~ . '" . . 0 . . ;;; .. " ~ !< . ;;; i . ~ . ~ [ ~ il' : [ !!. '" " Ii ~ f " . . . 0 '" ~ .. 1l ~ ~ ~ f il' ii II i r 3, ~ il' . ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. ~ " ~ il' 8 i ~ ~ .. . K ~ 1l ~ . ~ ~ '" . ~ ~ 3 ~ I ii .. ~ !!l [ '" ~ ~ 0 f !1. .. c .. J> f ~ ~ ~ f ! '" g '" '" ! , .. I '" ~ '" ~ 1l " 1 ~ ~ '" ~ J> ~ J> " " 0 '" . ~ .. il' ~ m i!' . ~ l ~ 0 c " s. " .- [ ~. ~ '" i< 0 a 1l '" . ~ ~ ~ ii . ~ ~ ~ r ~ '" ~ ~ m :!: t . " '" :l ;;; ~ ~ J> m ~ ~ ;;; ~ r , ~ m ;;; . ~ , - I 0 i ~ Ii . ~ a ~ lol = = ~. ~ N ~ N N N ~ ~ N N N - ~ N N ~ N ~ N - ~ ~ i ~ ~ ! ~ ~ i ~ ~ - J, t . ! ~ ~ ~ ~ J, ~ t i ~ J, J, J, '<\ J, J, . '<\ J, . . I ft t ~ ~ i i ~ '" ~ i ;;! ii ii -< -< ~ '" ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ii ii ;;! ii . . g . g '" ~ ~ o. ~ ~ o. "" g . g g . 0 ![ " ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ o. S S ~ ~ . = ~ :J ~ ~ " l'; l'; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ [ '" ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ . ~ . g ~ ~ g ~ g ~ ~ g ~ . . . . . . 0 . = g 0 - g g . g m . ~ .. i " !'l . ~ '" . !'l ~ 0 ~ = ~ " l5 !'l ~ ~ ~ = ~ 0 ~ " ~ ~ !!: " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 'li . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;a ~ a " ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ... ~ ::::.:.:.:...:::::.:...::..:.:..::::........::..:...:f::..::........::::::.::.::.::r:. m "' ~ ~ " d -~ "... ~ ~~ n' . ":IE j 'l ~: d 00' ] ..., N . iil In ~ r li:8 In ~ .. -~ i ~ " a .. .. .. .... "d,.< I. . .. .. n.El is; -8 o~ t I~ HO'" .. .. . ~ :J a;~ '" iil iil.. 1:: N ~~ ;;; -... .. ... .....- ... .... ..~ '" . ~i <>8 ~ ~ ... ... ... ....- ..-. P.." .. .. 0 ~ ~t ~N -!J 0 13 " Agenda Item #6 Bayshore Bikeway Working Group Aprtl 5. 2007 1-21 ATTACHMENT L DONALD F. STEUER CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER (619)531-5413 FAX (619) 531-5219 <1Inunt~ nf ~an ~i.egn AUDITOR AND CONTROLLER 1600 PACIFIC HIGHWAY STE 352, SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92101-2478 TRACY SANDOVAL AUDITOR AND CONTROLLER (619) 531-5413 FAX '6191 531-5219 May 10, 2007 City of Chula Vista Attention: Elizabeth Chopp 276 Fourth Ave. Chula Vista, CA 91910 Dear Elizabeth Chopp, Congratulations! Based on a recommendation from Supervisor Greg Cox, the Board of Supervisors approved a Community Projects award of $50,000.00 to your organization for preliminary engineering for the J Street to Stella Street segment of the Bayshore Bikeway. In order to receive these funds, you must enter into an agreement with the County that specifies the responsibilities you have with respect to the use of these funds and accounting for them. Two copies of the Grant Agreement are enclosed for your review and signature. Please read the grant agreement carefully, sign both copies, and return them both to the Office of Financial Planning in the enciosed self- addressed envelope at your earliest convenience. Upon receipt, I will sign and date them and will return one of the original agreements to you along with a check for the amount of the grant. Please allow two weeks processing time from when we receive the signed agreements from you to when your check will be ready. If the agreement requires you to raise matching funds, the agreement and check will be sent after you have submitted proof that you have obtained the matching funds. The effective date of the agreement will be the date that we generate the check. You will have 12 months from that date to spend the grant funds. In addition to the executed Grant Agreement and the check, your packet will include a form titled "Documentation of Grant Expenditures." As the agreement states, you must complete this form and send it together with supporting documentation to my office as soon as the grant funds have been expended, but no later than 13 months after the effective date of the Grant Agreement. Should you have any questions regarding this process, please contact Kevin Pasali at (619) 531-4887. JANEL E. PEHAU, Director ~~ Office of Fina'ncial Planning OFP:JEP:kp Enclosures 1-22 County office use only ATTACHMENT ~ P -1001838 0- 15650 E - 53664 T-999 A -100123 Supplier # 11 04304 STANDARD GRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO AND City of Chula Vista This Grant Agreem~t is entered into between the County of San Diego, a political subdivision of the State of California (County), and City ofChula Vista, a California Municipal Corporation (Grantee) and is effective on WHEREAS, the County wishes to reinvest taxpayer funds in the community to benefit the public by providing grant funds to community-based organizations that assist in meeting the social, cultural and recreational needs of County residents; and WHEREAS, on 4/1712007 (10), the Board of Supervisors allocated the grant funding set forth in this Agreement for the purpose described in this Agreement. NOW, TIffiREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises contained herein and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby acknowledged, the parties agree as follows: 1. PurDose of Grant. Grantee shall use the grant funds provided by County under this Agreement solely for the following purpose: for preliminary engineering for the J Street to Stella Street segment of the Bayshore Bikeway. 2. Term of Al!reement. The term of this Agreement shall be for 13 months starting on the effective date as specified above. 3. Deadline for Use of Grant Funds and Documentation of EXDenditures. (a) Grantee shall spend all grant funds provided by the County for the purposes specified in Paragraph 1 within 12 months of the effective date of this Agreement as specified above. (b) Grantee shall complete Documentation of Grant Expenditures setting forth Grantee's total actual expenditures of the grant funds provided under this Agreement. Grantee shall submit this documentation to the County's administrator promptly after spending the grant funds, but in any event, before the end of the Term of Agreement specified above. If the parties agree to extend the Term of Agreement, Grantee shall submit this expenditure documentation before the end of the extended Term. If County's administrator requests additional information regarding Grantee's expenditure of the grant funds, Grantee shall promptly submit the requested information to County's administrator. (c) If after reviewing Grantee's expenditure documentation, the County's administrator: (i) determines that the Grantee failed to spend all of the grant funds; (ii) disallows any expenditure by Grantee; or (iii) determines that the grant funds provided exceed Grantee's total actual expenditures authorized under this Agreement; Grantee shall refund to the county the amount specified by the County's administrator. Grantee shall make this refund within seven days after receiving a written request for refund from the County's administrator. In its sole discretion, the County may offset the refund amount from any payment due to or to become due to Grantee under this Agreement or any other agreement with the County. (d) If Grantee fails to provide the required documentation of expenditures as required in Subparagraph (b) above, the County's administrator may request Grantee to refund to the County all or any portion of the grant funds provided under this Agreement. Within Rev. 12/15/05 1 t 2 3 seven days of receipt of a written request for a refund, Grantee shall refund to the County the amount specified by the County's administrator. Grantee's failure to comply with this refund requirement shall constitute a material breach of this Agreement. ( e) If Grantee incurs expenses before the County pays the grant under this Agreement, the County will reimburse Grantee in an amount not to exceed the amount specified in Paragraph 4 upon submission of documentation to County's administrator setting forth Grantee's actual expenditures for the purpose specified in Paragraph I and approval of the documentation by County's administrator. (f) If Grantee fails to use all grant funds as specified in Paragraph I above before the deadline specified in Subparagraph (a) above, Grantee may request an extension of the Term. Grantee shall make any such request in writing at least two weeks before the deadline specified in Subparagraph (a) above. Grantee and the County's administrator may agree in writing to extend the Term of Agreement for a maximum of three months to allow Grantee additional time to spend the grant funds for the purpose specified in Paragraph I. 4. Amount of Grant. The county agrees to pay Grantee a grant of $50,000.00. Under no circumstances is County obligated to pay Grantee more than this amount. County shall pay Grantee after County receives a signed copy of this Agreement from Grantee. 5. Administrator of Al!reement. The Office of Financial Planning in the Auditor and Controller's Office shall administer this Agreement on behalf of the County, and Elizabeth Chopp at (619) 691-5046 shall administer it on behalf of Grantee. 6. ~ All communications from Grantee to the County shall be sent to the Chief Financial Officer as listed below. Any notice or notices or other documentation required or permitted to be given pursuant to this Agreement may be personally served on the other party by the party giving such notice, or may be served by certified mail, postage prepaid, return receipt requested, to the following addresses: County: Chief Financial Officer Office ofFinancial Planning County of San Diego 1600 Pacific Highway Room 352 San Diego, CA 92101 Grantee: City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Ave. Chula Vista, CA 91910 7. Audit and InsDection of Records. At any time during normal business hours and as often as the County may deem necessary, the Grantee shall make available to the County for examination all of its records with respect to all matters covered by this Agreement and will permit the County to audit, examine and make excerpts or transcripts from such records, and make audits of all invoices, materials, payrolls, records of personnel and other data relating to all matters covered by this Agreement. Unless otherwise specified by the County, said records should be made available for examination within San Diego County. Grantee shall maintain such records in an accessible location and condition for a period of not less than four years following receipt of final payment under this Agreement unless County agrees in writing to an earlier disposition. The State of California or any Federal agency having an interest in the subject of this Agreement shall have the same rights conferred upon County by this Agreement. Rev. 12/15/05 2-24 8. Termination of Al!I"eement for Cause. If Grantee fails to perform its obligations according to this Agreement, the County may send Grantee a written notice of default that specifies the nature of the default. Grantee shall cure the default within three days following receipt of the notice of default. If Grantee fails to cure the default within that time, the County may terminate this Agreement by giving Grantee written notice of immediate termination. Upon termination, Grantee shall promptly provide County's administrator with Documentation of Grant Expenditures setting forth Grantee's total actual expenditures for the purpose of the grant as of the effective date of termination. Grantee shall promptly refund to County all funds County paid to Grantee under this Agreement that exceed Grantee's total actual expenditures for the purpose of the gran~ as determined by County's administrator, as of the effective date of termination. The County may also seek any and all legal and equitable remedies against Grantee for breaching this Agreement. 9. Termination for Convenience of County. County may terminate this Agreement at any time by giving written notice to Grantee of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof at least 30 days before the effective date of such termination. On or before the date of termination, Grantee shall provide County's administrator with Documentation of Grant Expenditures setting forth Grantee's total actual expenditures for the purpose of the grant as of the effective date of termination. Grantee shall promptly refund to County all funds County paid to Grantee under this Agreement that exceed Grantee's total actual expenditures for the purpose of the gran~ as determined by County's administrator, as of the effective date of termination. 10. Termination for Convenience of Grantee. Grantee may terminate this Agreement at any time by giving written notice to County's administrator of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof at least 60 days before the effective date of such termination. On or before the date of termination, Grantee shall provide County's admiuistrator with Documentation of Grant Expenditures setting forth Grantee's total actual expenditures for the purpose of the grant as of the effective date of termination. Grantee shall promptly refund to County all funds County paid to Grantee under this Agreement that exceed Grantee's total actual expenditure for the purpose of the gran~ as determined by County's administrator, as of the effective date of termination. 11. Assilmment. Grantee shall not assign or transfer any interest in this Agreement (whether i:>t assignment or novation), without the prior written consent of the County. 12. Interest of Grantee. Grantee covenants that Grantee presently has no interes~ including, but not limited to, other projects or independent contracts, and shall not acquire any such interest, direct or indirect, which would conflict in any manner or degree with Grantee's completing the purpose of the grant as specified in Paragraph I. Grantee further covenants that in the performance of this Agreemen~ no person having any such interest shall be employed or retained by Grantee. 13. Publication. Reoroduction and Use of MateriaL No material produced, in whole or in p~ under this Agreement shall be subject to copyright in the United States or in any other Country. The County shall have unrestricted authority to publish, disclose, distribute, and otherwise use, in whole or in p~ any reports, data or other materials prepared under this Agreement. 14. Insurance. Grantee shall maintain insurance against claims or injuries to person or damages to property that may arise from or in connection with the use of the grant funds by Grantee, its agents, representatives, employees, volunteers or subcontractors. The cost of such insurance shall be borne by Grantee and coverage limits shall be a minimum of $1,000,000 General Liability per occurrence/$I,OOO,OOO aggregate for operations, products and completed operations for bodily injury, personal injury .and property damage; $500,000 Automobile Liability per accident for bodily injury and property damage; and Workers' Compensation and Employers Liability Insurance as required by the California Labor Code. County shall retain the right at any time to review the coverage and amount of insurance required. Rev. 12/15/05 13-25 15. IndeoendentCaoacitv. In the performance of this Agreement, Grantee and its agents, employees and volunteers shall act in an independent capacity and not as officers, employees, agents or volunteers of the County. This Agreement does not create an employment relationship between Grantee and the County. 16. Eoual Onoortunitv. Grantee will not discriminate against any employee, or against any applicant for such employment because of age, race, color, religion, physical handicap, ancestry, sex, or national origin. This provision shall include, but not be limited to, the following: employment, upgrading, demotion, or transfer; recruitment or recruitment advertising; layoff or termination; rates of payor other forms of compensation; and selection for training, including apprenticeship. 17. Defense and Indemnitv. To the fullest extent permitted by law, County shall not be liable for, and Grantee shall defend and indemnify County and its officers, agents, employees and volunteers (collective, "County Parties") against any and all claims, deductibles, self-insured retention's, demands, liability, judgments, awards, fines, mechanics' liens or other liens, labor disputes, losses, damages, expenses, charges or costs of any kind or character, including attorneys' fees and court costs (collectively, "Claims"), which arise out of or are in any way connected to County's provision of grant funds andlor Grantee's use of grant funds under this Agreement arising either directly or indirectly from any act, error, omission or negligence of Grantee or its officers, employees, volunteers, agents, contractors, licensees or servants, including without limitation, Claims caused by the sole passive negligent act or the concurrent negligent act, error or omission, whether active or passive, of County Parties. Grantee shall have no obligation, however, to defend or indemnify County Parties from a Claim if it is determined by a court of competent jurisdiction that such Claim was caused by the sole active negligent act or willful misconduct of County Parties. 18. Governin!! Law. This Agreement shall be construed and interpreted according to the laws of the State of California. 19. Comnlete A!!reement. This Agreement constitutes the entire agreement between Grantee and County regarding the subject matter contained herein. All other representations, oral or written, are superseded by this Agreement. Neither party is relying on any representation outside of this Agreement. This Agreement may be changed only by written amendment signed by both parties. 20. Waiver. The failure of either party to enforce any term, covenant or condition of this Agreement shall not be construed as a waiver of that party's right to subsequently enforce this, or any other term, covenant or condition of this Agreement. No waiver shall be deemed effective unless the waiver is expressly stated in writing and signed by the party waiving the right or benefit. 21. Consultation with Counsel. Each party has had the opportunity to consult with independent legal counsel of its own choosing before executing this Agreement and has executed this Agreement without fraud, duress, or undue influence of any kind. 22. Internretation. The provisions of this Agreement shall be liberally construed to effectuate its purpose. The language of all parts of this Agreement shall be construed simply according to its plain meaning and shall not be construed for or against either party. 23. Cornoration Oualified to Do Business in California. If Grantee is a California corporation, Grantee warrants that it is a corporation in good standing and is currently authorized to do business in California. 24. Terms and Conditions Survive Exoiration of Term of A!!reement. Unless otherwise specified herein, all terms and conditions of this Agreement shall survive the expiration of the Term of Agreement specified in Paragraph 2 above or the termination of this Agreement under Paragraphs 8, 9 or 10 above. [Remainder of this page left blank intentionally] Rev. 12/15/05 f-26 25. Remedies. The rights and remedies in this Agreement are in addition to, and not a limitation on, all other rights and remedies available at law or in equity, and exercise of one right or remedy shall not be deemed a waiver of any other right or remedy. WHEREFORE, the parties execute this Agreement on the date first written above. COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO GRANTEE 1. By: By: Date Chief Financial Officer or Designated Representative Print Name and Title Janel Pehau, Director Office of Financial Planning 2. By: Date Print Name and Title [Note: if Grantee is a California non-profit corporation, need I signature from each of the following 2 groups: (I) Executive Group: President, Vice-President or Chairman of the Board; and (2) Management Group: Secretary, Assistant Secretary, Assistant Treasurer or Chief Financial Officer.] (Corp. Code ~ 5214.) Return This Agreement D-27 Rev. 12115/05 ATTACHMENT -(0 2006 Regional Transportation Improvement Program DRAFT Amendment NO.6 San Diego Region (in $OOOs) Chula Vista, Ci of MPO ID: CHV36 Capacity Status: NCI RTIP #: 06-06 TITLE: Heritage Road Bridge Studies Exempt Category: Other - Engineering studies DESCRIPTION: Preliminary Engineering, environmental analysis and project design for future widening of Heritage Road Bridge (DEMO ID: CA356; HPP No: 450) CHANGE REASON: Revise funding between fiscal years, No change to programming HPP AC Local Funds AC TOTAL $2,800 $1,820 TOTAL $4,620 PRIOR 06/07 07/08 $2,240 $2,380 $4,620 08/09 $560 $(560) 09/10 10/11 PE $2,800 $1,820 $4,620 RW CON P~'\C\, ::CT Fjr~IOR TO /"Mf"~_NfJMFNr TOTAL QGf{j( n:J;O$ 031<1S D':i!1U 10/11 PE Rii'1i CON ,.of.' HF'P SL3L"O i ()~n s ,,; 1;;'0 S~:{:iO , ~?O t/kdl '-W!(Y Elli' 1.0i;~ll ;':::xds 'hi 12;') TOTAL 34,&2D ~4,SJfj $4,G20 MPO ID: CHV39 Capacity Status: NCI RTIP #: 06-06 TITLE: Traffic Signal System Optimization Exempt Category: Other - Intersection signalization projects DESCRIPTION: This progr'am will provide funding to assist staff with upgrading existing traffic signal coordination to improve traffic circulation, reduce intersection delays and reduce congestion throughout the City. CHANGE REASON: New project TOTAL PRIOR 06/07 07/08 08/09 09/10 10/11 PE RW CON TransNet - L $150 $150 $150 TransNet . LSI $250 $150 $50 $50 $250 TOTAL $400 $150 $150 $50 $50 $400 MPO ID: CHV40 Capacity Status: NCI RTI P #: 06-06 TITLE: Bayshore Bikeway Exempt Category: Air Quality - Bicycle and pedestrian facilities DESCRIPTION: This project will provide funds for preliminary engineering on Segments 7 and 8 of the Chula Vista portion of the Bayshore Bikeway, which extends from E Street to Main Street CHANGE REASON: New project TOTAL PRIOR 06/07 01108 08/09 09J10 10/11 PE RW CON Local Funds $50 $50 $50 TransNet. L $50 $50 $50 TOTAL $100 $100 $100 Page 11 Friday, May 25, 2007 1-28 RESOLUTION 2007- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING A $50,000 GRANT FROM THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO. WHEREAS, the Bayshore Bikeway is a designated 24-mile bikeway route around San Diego Bay within the jurisdictions of the City of Chula Vista, (City) City of Coronado, City of National City, City of San Diego; and WHEREAS, planning for the bikeway began in 1975 with a final study completed in 1976; and WHEREAS, a number of key bike paths segments have been constructed since the original Bayshore Bikeway feasibility study was prepared; and WHEREAS, throughout the history of the bikeway, cooperation among jurisdictions along the route has been critical to obtaining funding and getting bike paths segments implemented; and WHEREAS, shortly after the 1976 feasibility study was released, the Bay Route Bikeway Steering Committee was formed by the County of San Diego (County), the City, and the cities of Coronado, Imperial Beach, National City and San Diego; and WHEREAS, in 1989, the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) established the Bayshore Bikeway Policy Advisory Committee, now known as the Bayshore Bikeway Working Group, which consists of an elected official from the County, the City, and the cities of Coronado, Imperial Beach, National City and San Diego, as well as Advisory Members from the Metropolitan Transit System and the San Diego Unified Port District, and representative of the region's bicycling community; and WHEREAS, the County wishes to reinvest taxpayer funds in the community to benefit the public by providing grant funds to community-based organizations that assist in meeting the social, cultural and recreational needs of County residents; and WHEREAS, on April 17, 2007, the County Board of Supervisors allocated $50,000 in grant funding for the purposes of preliminary engineering for the J Street to Stella Street segment of the Bayshore Bikeway located within the City, also know as Segment 8A; and 1-29 WHEREAS, the County requires the City to enter into a Grant Agreement in order to receive the $50,000 in grant funds; and WHEREAS, the City will establish a Capital Improvement Project entitled "Bayshore Bikeway" (STL337) within the Fiscal Year 2007/2008 Capital Improvement Program that will include $50,000 in TransNet funds to supplement the $50,000 in grant funds from the County in order to have $100,000 available to complete the preliminary engineering and preliminary environmental work on Segment 8A; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is not a "Project" as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines at this time because it involves only the acceptance of a grant and authorization to proceed with engineering and environmental studies for the project; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060 (c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines the activity is not subject to CEQA and once the project has been fully defined, environmental review will be required and a CEQA determination completed. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista as follows: 1. That it accepts $50,000 in grant funds from the County of San Diego. 2. That it authorizes the City Manager to execute a Grant Agreement with the County of San Diego. Presented by Approved as to form by Scott Tulloch City Engineer L/LJ tLCv~ Ann Moore City Attorney H:\ENGINEER\RESOS\Resos2007\06-12-07\Reso - Bayshore Bikeway Grant revised by ec.doc 1-30