HomeMy WebLinkAboutReso 1982-10735
Form No. 344
Rev. 2-79
RESOLUTION NO. 10735
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA APPROVING THE TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR
CHULA VISTA TRACT 82-5, CENTRE VILLAS
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista finds as
follows:
That in accordance with the attached Negative Declara-
tion, IS-8l-33 , and the findings therein, the proposed tentative
map will not have a significant impact upon the environment, and
the City Council hereby certifies that the Negative Declaration
was prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality
Act of 1970, as amended.
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Chula
Vista has heretofore approved that certain tentative map of a
subdivision to be known as Chula Vista Tract 82-5, Centre Villas
and has recommended that the City Council approve said tentative
map subject to the conditions contained in Planning Commission
Resolution No. PCS-82-5 , adopted on the 2nd day of December
1981, a copy of which is attached hereto and by this reference made
a part hereof the same as though fully set forth herein.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE
of the City of Chula Vista does
division man in accordance with
PCS-82-5 .
IT RESOLVED that the City Council
hereby approve said tentative sub-
Planning Commission Resolution No.
Presented by
form by
~../~~'-~A~/--
. D.-J. rson, Director of
Planning
George D. Lindberg, Citv Attorney
ADOPTED AND APPROVED by the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, this 5th day of January , 1982,
by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES:
Councilmen
McCandliss, Scott, Cox, Gillow, Campbell
NAYES:
Councilmen
None
ABSENT:
Councilmen
None
/I.. (J"
.,
,
Vista
ATTES~'JOhC 1/') ~~ k~~
. City'Clerk . ~
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO) ss.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA )
I, , City Clerk of the City
of Chula Vista, California, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that the above is a full,
true and correct copy of Resolution No. , and that the same has
not been amended or repealed. DATED
City Clerk
'CONDITiUNED
negative
declaration
PROJECT NAME:
Hoffman & Salganick Condos
PROJECT LOCATION:
344, 350, 354 G Street
PROJECT APPLICANT:
Hoffman & Salganick
330 Oxford #112
Chula Vista, CA 92011
A. Project Setting
The Project involves approximately 1.1 acres of property which is
presently divided into 3 lots containing 3 dwellings at 344, 350
& 354 G Street. Adjacent land uses consist of multiple and single
family dwellings to the south, multiple family dwellings to the east
a vacant lot to the west and the Chula Vista Women's Club and single
family dwellings to the north across G Street.
The project site is void of any significant wildlife and there are
no significant natural or man-made resources present, although one
mature pepper tree is located on~site. Expansive soils may be
present on the site and there are no known geologic hazards within
the project vicinity.
B. Project Description
The applicant proposes to remove the existing single family dwellings
and accessory structures in order to construct 26 two bedroom units,
18 contained in four two-story townhouse structure. In addition,
28 one-car garages are proposed along with 17 open parking spaces.
C. Compatibility with zoning and plans
1. Soils
The City Engineering Dept. has indicated that expansive soils
are present in the project area, therefore a soils report should
be prepared and recommendations incorporated into the project
to ensure stable construction.
2. Drainaoe
The increase in the amount of surface runoff which empties into
existing storm drain systems resulting from this project will
be insianificant. It should be noted that future development
within this drainage basin will warrant increasing the capacity
of existing downstream storm drain facilities.
city 01 chula vista planning department
environmental review section
@~
1S-81-33 (2)
3. Aesthetics
The developer proposes to remove one mature pepper tree in order
to construct the proposed project. The developer should
coordinate with the City's Landscape Architect concerning the
disposition of the tree. An effort should be made to retain
this tree if feasible.
4. Parks
The existing park acreage in Park District No.3 is 8.6 acres,
and the current requirement for this district is 22.4 acres.
The proposed project will generate the need for 1.38 acres of
parkland which can be satisfied by payment of in-lieu park fees
which will be used for acquisition and development of additional
park acreage.
5. Schools
The local elementary and junior high schools serving the project
area are currently approaching capacity enrollment. This
project, combined with proposed projects in the same vicinity,
will serve to increase enrollment to maximum capacity levels.
The developer shall comply with public facilities policies and
ensure adequate classroom space for new students.
E. Mitigation necessary to avoid significant effects
1. The developer shall not oppose the formation of any
assessment district formed for the purpose of providing adequate
storm drain facilities to serve the project area.
2. The developer shall coordinate with the City's Landscape
Architect concerning the disposition of the existing pepper
tree located on the project site. An effort shall be made
to retain this tree if feasible.
(The following measures are standard development regulations
and are advisory only):
3. A soils report shall be prepared and all recommendations
are to be incorporated into the project.
4. The developer shall provide the City with written assurance
from the school districts that adequate educational facilities
are available for all new students.
F. Findings of insignificant impact
1. The site is void of any natural or man-made resource,
although one mature pepper tree is present. Proposed mitigation
will ensure the proper disposition of the existing tree. Expansive
soils may be present, however, proposed mitigation will ensure
stable construction.
~~~
2. The proposed residential development is consistent with
the General Plan and associated elements and is not anticipated
to achieve short term to the disadvantage of long term environ-
mental goals.
3. No impacts are anticipated to occur which could interact
to create a substantial cumulative effect on the environment.
4. The project will not cause the emission of any harmful
substance or noise which could prove hazardous to the health
and welfare of human beings.
G. Consultation
1. 1nvididuals and organizations
City of Chula Vista
Steve Griffin, Assoc. Planner
Roger Daoust, Senior Eng.
Shabda Roy, Assoc. Eng.
Tom Dyke, Bldg. Dept.
Ted Monsell, Fire Marshal
Duane Bazzel, Asst. Planner
John Nash - Applicants designer
2. Documents
1S-8l-32 Bergh Condominiums
The Initial Study Application and evaluation forms documenting the
findings of no sianlficant impact are on file and available for
public hearing at thc Chula Vista Planning Dept., 276 4th Avenue,
Chula Vista, CA 92010
(
. I.
.A-/._c-
-'
/
) -,-/
REV I CI'i COOl'.IlI:JATOR
ENVI RO;::-lE::T ,\L
- /~ 7.-]~'j"
city 01 chula vista planning department
environmental review section
@0
EN 6
-" .:..t._._......-"'.,.;....=~_~"""",:...~'_,'ll:.;lt:l<iO"~.~-u ~_
Ll
',':
RESOLUTION NO. PCS-82-5
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY PLANNING CO~lMISSION REC0I1MENDING TO
THE CITY COUNCIL THE APPROVAL OF THE TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION
MAP FOR CHULA VISTA TRACT 82-5, CENTRE VILLAS
WHEREAS, a tentative subdivision map for Chula Vista Tract 82-5, Centre
Villas, was filed by Hoffman and Salganick to develop a one lot condominium
project consisting of 26 units on 1.1 acres located at 344-354 "G" Street, in
the R-3 zone, and
WHEREAS, Section 66473.5 of the State Map Act provides that approval of a
subdivision map shall be based upon findings of consistency between the subdivision
map and the adopted general or specific plan for the area, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission set the time and place for a public hearing
to consider said tentative map, and notice of said hearing, with its purpose, was
given by the publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city at
least 10 days prior to the date of said hearing, and
WHEREAS, a hearing was held at said time and place, namely 7:00 p.m.,
December 2, 1981, in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the Planning
Commission and said hearing was thereafter closed, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission found that this development will have no
significant environmental impacts and adopted the Negative Declaration issued on
IS-81-33 with the following mitigation measures:
a. The developer shall not oppose the formation of any assessment district
formed for the purpose of providing adequate storm drain facilities to
serve the project area.
b. The developer shall coordinate with the City's Landscape Architect
concerning the disposition of the existing pepper tree located on the
project site. An effort shall be made to retain this tree, if feasible.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
From facts presented to the Planning Commission, the Commission finds that
the tentative subdivision map for Chula Vista Tract 82-5, Centre Villas, is is
conformance with the City's General Plan, based on the following:
1. The site is surrounded by R-3 zoning and is physically suited for multiple
family residential development.
2. The design of the project will not affect the existing public improvements,
such as streets, sewer, drainage, etc., which have been designed to avoid any
serious health problems.
3. Approval of this project will not adversely affect the public service needs
of the residents of the city or available fiscal and environmental resources.
Ifl l," "..., '."1 ,/
4. The subdivision is consistent with the General Plan and its elements as
fo 11 ows :
a. Land Use - The density of 23 units per acre is in keeping with the
General Plan designation of 13-26 units per acre.
b. Circulation - The development is not required to dedicate or improve
additional streets.
c. Housing - The project will provide needed housing in the community
and a choice of home ownership.
d. Conservation - The site is void of any significant wild life and
there are no natural or manmade resources present on site.
e. Parks and Recreation - The developer is required to pay fees in lieu
of dedicating and improving park land.
f. Seismic Safety and Safety - The development is not adjacent to or
near any known earthquake faults and is well within the response
time of the fire station located on "F" Street.
g. Noise - The structures will be constructed to meet the Uniform
Building Code requirements with respect to noise attenuation.
h. Scenic Highway "G" Street is not a designated scenic route.
i. Bicycle Routes "G" Street is not a designated bicycle route.
j. Public Buildings - No public buildings are designated on the project
site.
5. Pursuant to Section 66412.2 of the Subdivision Map Act the Commission
certifies that it has considered the effect of this approval on the housing needs
of the region and has balanced those needs against the public service needs of the
residents of the City of Chula Vista and the available fiscal and environmental
resources, and determined that the subject property is well suited for residential
development.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED:
That the Planning Commission recommends that the City Council approve the
tentative map for Chula Vista Tract 82-5, Centre Villas. subject to the following
conditions:
1. The following work within the right-of-way shall be completed or guaranteed
prior to approval of the final map:
a. The developer shall remove all existing driveways on "G" Street
adjacent to the project.
f- / (J7.Ji""
-2-
b. The developer shall remove the existing curb along "G" Street
adjacent to the project and replace same with curb and gutter.
c. The developer shall replace all cracked or displaced sidewalk along
"G" Street adjacent to the project.
2. Prior to approval of the final map, the developer shall obtain either,
a. A 10 foot wide drainage easement corresponding to the proposed
flow of water to Vance Street across the existing parking lot on
adjacent property, or
b. A notorized letter from the owner indicating his acceptance of
run-off from the project across or onto his parking lot.
3. Prior to approval of the final map, the developer shall submit calcula-
tions indicating the depth of flow in the gutter along Vance Street
resulting from the runoff generated by the project. Should the capacity
of the street be too small to accommodate the additional runoff generated
by this project the developer shall provide retention facilities to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer.
4. Prior to approval of the final map, the developer shall enter into an
agreement with the City not to protest the formation of a future 1911
(or other) improvement district to provide adequate storm drain facilities
to serve the project area.
5. The developer shall prepare a grading and drainage plan for the site; said
plan shall be submitted to the City and approved by the City Engineer
prior to approval of the final map.
6. The developer shall not restrict the natural drainage pattern from
property east of the project site.
7. The developer shall record Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R's),
which shall be subject to the approval of the City Council, concurrently
with the recordation of the final map.
8. The City of Chula Vista shall be made a party to the CC&R's which shall
include but not be limited to the following:
a. Prohibition against the installation of individual outside antennae.
b. Provision for the maintenance of all common areas, required fencing,
buildings, carports, and parking areas including driveways.
9. No building permits will be issued until such time as the school
districts have given written notice to the City that they are able to
provide school facilities for the residents of the project.
/p~ /() 735'
-3-
10. One onsite fire hydrant shall be provided between buildings "0" and "F"
as required by the. Fire Marshal. The hydrant shall have one 4-inch
outlet and one 2Yz inch outlet. Required fire flow is 2,000 gpm.
The Planning Commission directs that this resolution be forwarded to the
City Council and a copy be sent to the applicant.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
this 2nd day of December, 1981, by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES:
Commissioners Green, Stevenson, O'Neill, G. Johnson, R. Johnson
and Wi 11 i ams
NAYS:
None
ABSENT:
Commissioner Pressutti
~ ~~r' /7
\,~f'[.7 (0( ,'~'v'''~-''_
, Chairman Pro Tem
ATTEST:
.?') / .,
." y:.( (;<.<" L.
/')
/ J I t:f;: ju..e .;'
/ Secretary
1?-/~l35
~
---
, ---
I--
I
.
I
---
'----
- --
-- -
---
)
--
,
I I - - 'I I
I . I
I PARK WAY I
I : : I I I , : , I I I I I ; I , I
, I , I I I I C) I I I , I .
I I I I I I I , I I > I I I I . ,
1--- I I I I . ::u .
I I I I I I I I I I -.
I ::u
,... '- tj}
I Women' ~
I ''\ Club TF SF MF TF
SF Vac Vac TF SF MF SF SF SF TF MF '"
L.:___ I'GII--------~---.-----
Yael I MF' 'SF' 'SF' I
... I MF' I SFI 'MF I I SF'
0., I · I I , ,I I
I , , , I I I l.f"'
c: .. I I I I I
:u ---'- - _L_ I I
-t MF . __1_
:J: ----- MF ~
SF SF SF MF
VANCE
ST.
.
I
SF1SF
SF
I
: ,1-
I I
I I
I
I ,
.
SF
SF SF
SF MF
SF
SF
SF
I I
I I
I I
! :
ROOSEVEL T
____..J : ; : i : : i ;
I , I , I I I I I
I I : I I I I I
_ _ _ _ L 1. _ ,_ ..J I I I I
I ' I I I :
---------1 I 1 I I
I I I I
I I I I
I I
IMF I 'SF' 'TF'
MF I :SF: :MP IMF
I I I ' I
:PRO~EeT
IAREA I I
I I I
. I I
I ' I ,
i I I" I
MF ITF
I
I
.
I
I
I
I
I
.
I
I
I
TF 'MFI
I I
I '
, I
I I
I I
I I
: !
, ,
l- 1
I".:!~.'
(1f-~ I
'-.' -'
1'"1 I
I I I
I I I
I : !
I
I I'
I I'
I I'
I I'
. .
ST
;
I
I
I i
I _
I "
I
I ~
~
---
---
----
-t ..
:J: ~,
-
::u
c -
-
(c-c)
----
~
-
--- --
-----
---
I
r---- --
L_____
..
I I I
, I I
, I I
~O~~ -'-r-..l-
I I.
, I
. I ,1
. I I
, I I
I I I
.
I I "H" t:1
-
VILLAS)
)
LOCATOR
PCS-82-5
Pe~mit to construct ' 16 condominium
units ot
344 - 354 "G" street
'-