Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994/08/23 Item 13 COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item IJA Meeting Date 8/23/94 SUBMITTED BY: PUBLIC HEARING to Consider Adoption of the Nondisposal Facility Element (NDFE) as Required by AB440 RESOLUTION NO. /7&,.2 ~doPting the NDFE and Authorizing the City Manager to Submit the NDFE to the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB) and the County of San Diego for Inclusion in the Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan Conservation Coordinarr ~~~') City Manage0t ~~I (4/5ths Vote: Yes_ NoX) TITLE: REVIEWED BY: BACKGROUND: California Public Resources Code, Sections 41730 et seq, requires every California city and county to prepare and adopt a Nondisposal Facility Element (NDFE) for existinf: or proposed nondisposal facilities that will be needed to implement their local Integrated Waste Management Plans. Examples of a nondisposal facility include: transfer stations, mixed waste materials recovery facilities and composting facilities. Because the County of San Diego has less than 15 years of permitted disposal capacity remaining, the County and all cities within the County are required to submit their NDFE's to the state by August 31, 1994. If approved by Council, the NDFE will inform the state that the City is diverting yard waste to a local composting facility. The NDFE will also inform the state that the City is in the process of selecting a site and permitting a proposed transfer station and materials recovery facility. RECOMMENDATION: Approve resolution. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The draft NDFE was submitted to the Resource Conservation Commission with an oral report on August 8, 1994 for their review and comment. The Report will be discussed again on August 22, 1994 when the Commission has had a chance to thoroughly review the report. An oral report of the Commission's actions can be given at this Council meeting and a copy of the minutes can be forwarded to Council when available, if desired. DISCUSSION: General NDFE Requirements Transfer stations, composting facilities and mixed waste material recovery facilities typically process or transform waste in preparation for disposal and/or secondary markets. These 1:1/1- / Page 2, ItemQ--9 Meeting Date 8/23/94 facilities require a state solid waste facility permit and are therefore defined as nondisposal facilities. "Clean" material recovery facilities (MRF's), recycling buy-back centers and drop-off centers process source-separated materials, not mixed solid waste, and do not require state solid waste facility permits. Because these facilities do not require state solid waste permits they are not considered nondisposal facilities and do not need to be included in the NDFE. The state also requires local jurisdictions to submit draft NDFE's to the Local Task Force for approval prior to submitting them to the state. The San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) is the Local Task Force for the cities and County of San Diego. The County and cities agreed to coordinate the development of their NDFE's and submit the NDFE's to the Local Task Force jointly. The Local Task Force reviewed all the NDFE's, and on April 22, 1994 recommended that the state approve the County and all city NDFE's including the City ofChula Vista's NDFE. Chula Vista NDFE Contents The City is required to list in the NDFE any current facilities or proposed facilities that may require a state solid waste permit, and are needed to implement its local Integrated Waste Management Plan. Disposal facilities such as the Otay landfill are not to be listed. There are no facilities in Chula Vista, other than the Otay landfill, that currently require a state solid waste facility permit. However, the Chula Vista NDFE lists one existing facility, a composting facility; Organic Recycling West (ORW.) ORW's compo sting facility is just outside the Chula Vista city limits in the Brown Field area. ORW is the only fully permitted large composting site in the area and can accept 240 tons per day of yard waste and wood waste from public and private generators. ORW chips and grinds the yard and wood waste as necessary to prepare it for their outdoor windrow composting operation. When the composting process is complete, ORW will begin to sell its product to local landscape, nursery and agricultural markets. According to Chula Vista's solid waste generation study, yard waste (17.4%) and wood waste (9.7%) account for 27.1 % of the City's total annual waste stream. ORW and/or comparable facilities within the region are expected to divert up to 22 % of the City's total waste stream through composting. That 22 % diversion and a local composting facility like ORW, even though it is not within the City limits, is an important factor in the City's plan to meet the state mandated diversion goals of 25 % by 1995 and 50 % by the year 2000. The City was instrumental in attracting ORW to the region and is ORW's largest customer. The City's residential yard waste collection program has diverted more than 700 tons a month of yard 13~~~ Page 3, Item ):1 ~ Meeting Date 8/23/94 waste and clean wood from the landfill to ORW since it opened in April of this year. The City has also worked with ORW to divert tree trimmings, grass clippings and clean wood from landscapers, cabinet shops, construction sites, and City streets and parks. This facility is one example of the types of nondisposal facilities that are necessary to cost -effectively meet the state mandated diversion goals and environmentally manage waste as a resource. It is also an example of a regional facility and an informal public-private partnership that is working. Under the "Proposed Transfer Station and Composting Facilities," section the Chula Vista NDFE describes the current status of the City's Request for Proposal for a transfer station. The Chula Vista NDFE indicates that the City has received proposals and selected a contractor to complete the facility site and permit phase only. The NDFE also states the City has llil1 made a decision to construct a transfer station or contract for its operation at this time, however, should the City make the decision to move forward in the future, it will amend the NDFE at that time. Upon adoption by Council, the NDFE will become part of the City's Integrated Waste Management Plan which also includes the Source Reduction and Recycling Element and Household Hazardous Waste Element. FISCAL IMP ACT: Adoption and submittal of the NDFE will have no fiscal impact. mtrn:c ndfe2. cas Attachment 1:1/1' J RESOLUTION NO. 17/, t2/r'" RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING THE NDFE AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO SUBMIT THE DOCUMENT TO THE CALIFORNIA INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD (CIWMB) AND THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO FOR INCLUSION IN THE COUNTYWIDE INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN WHEREAS, California Public Resources Code (PRC) , section 41730 et seq., requires every California city and county to prepare and adopt a Nondisposal Facility Element (NDFE) for all new nondisposal facilities, and any expansions of existing nondisposal facilities, which will be needed to implement local Source Reduction and Recycling Elements (SRREs); and WHEREAS, a nondisposal facility is defined as any solid waste facility required to obtain a state solid waste facility permit except a disposal facility or a transformation facility (PRC section 40151) such as transfer stations, mixed waste materials recovery facilities (MRF's) and composting facilities; and WHEREAS, Assembly Bill 440 (Sher) established an NDFE reporting schedule based on remaining permitted disposal capacity; and WHEREAS, the County of San Diego has less than 15 years disposal capacity and local jurisdictions are required to submit NDFE's directly to the State by August 31, 1994. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the city of Chula vista does hereby adopt a Nondisposal Facility Element (NDFE) and authorize the City Manager to submit the document to the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB) and the County of San Diego for Inclusion in the Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan. fo= bQ Presented by Michael Meacham, Conservation Coordinator C:\rs\NDFE 13/1 ..~ ~f~ W8' 01Y Of O<<AA VISfA ATTACHMENT City of Chula Vista Nondisposal Facility Element California Public Resources Code (pRC), Sections 41730 et seq, requires every California city and county to prepare and adopt a Nondisposal Facility Element (NDFE) for all new Nondisposal Facilities, and any expansions of existing Nondisposal Facilities, which will be needed to implement local Source Reduction and Recycling Elements (SRRE). A Nondisposal Facility is defined as any solid waste facility required to obtain a state solid waste facility permit except a disposal facility or a transformation facility (PRC Section 40151). The City of Chula Vista has prepared, adopted and hereby transmits to San Diego County the City's NDFE, as required by PRC Section 41730. The City is also submitting a copy of its NDFE to the California Integrated Waste Management Board for review and approval. The City's NDFE will be appended to the City's SRRE at the time of the five year revision. The City of Chula Vista has completed a "Request For Proposal" (RFP) process for a transfer station and material recovery facility. The City has selected a contractor to complete only the facility siting and permitting phase of the process. The City has not made a decision to construct a facility or contract for its operation at this time, however, should the City make the decision to move forward in the future it will amend the NDFE at that time. This NDFE identifies the use of Organic Recycling West as a Nondisposal Facility that is being utilized to implement the City's Integrated Solid Waste Management Plan and meet the waste diversion goals. Tables M-I, M-2 and M-3 attached, identify the Nondisposal Facilities that the City of Chula Vista may utilize to implement its SRRE and meet the solid waste diversion requirements of PRC Section 41780. A draft of this NDFE was submitted to the San Diego County Local Task Force (LTF) for review and comment regarding the regional impacts of the Nondisposal Facilities identified in this Element, in accordance with the requirements ofPRC Sections 41734(a) and (b). As indicated by PRC Section 41735(a), the adoption or amendment of this element is not subject to environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). /:1/9 ..S TYPE OF FACILITY No specific facilities are currently proposed, although the City is in the process of selecting a site, developing a conceptual design and permitting a possible transfer station. A decision to move forward with construction will probably be made some time after January of 1995. EXPECTED DIVERSION RATE Unknown at this time PARTICIPATING Unknown at this time JURISDICTIONS LOCATION Unknown at this time /3/1 ' t, TYPE OF FACILITY AMOUNT OF WASTE SENT TO FACILITY EXPECTED DIVERSION RATE LOCATION The Organic Recycling West (ORW) composting facility is just outside the Chula Vista city limits. ORW is the only fully permitted large composting site in the area and can accept 240 tons per day of yard waste, other plants and wood waste from public and private yard and wood waste generators. ORW chips and grinds the waste as necessary to prepare it for their outdoor windrow composting operation. Approximately 27% or 50,000 tons (137 tpd average) of the City of Chula Vista's waste is yard waste and wood waste. The City may direct up to 137 tons of wood and yard waste per day to ORW or comparable compost facilities that may be permitted to operate within the region. Approximately 750 tons per month were sent to the facility during its first four months of operation, April thru June 1994. ORW and/or comparable facilities within the region are expected to divert up to 22 % of the City of Chula Vista's total waste stream through composting. According to the City's waste generation study, yard (17.4%) and wood waste (9.7 %) account for 27.1 % of the total annual waste stream. The City's medium-term goal is to divert 79% of the annual commercial and residential yard and wood waste stream to attain a 22 % total waste stream diversion goal. To attain that goal the City has developed and distributed a backyard composting guide, assisted with the development of ORW and commercial on-site mulching and composting operations, initiated a local waste exchange program, and implemented a mandatory City-wide residential yard waste collection program that encourages source reduction and backyard composting. 1202 La Media Road, San Diego CA 92173 1,3;9- ? NAME OF FACILITY Their are no transfer stations currently in operation within the City or being used by generators within the City. EXPECTED DIVERSION RATE Not applicable PARTICIPATING Not Applicable JURISDICTIONS LOCATION Not Applicable mtmc: ndfemodl.4 13,4' ~ ORGANIC RECYCLING WEST, INC. 4751 WILSHIRE BOULEVARD, SUITE209, LOS ANGELES, CA90010 TELEPHONE: (213) 933.5943 FAX: (213) 932.0575 August 17, 1994 ""'" ~ 7)~ ---!- -It ----.:......... ") / -.1 ~ %~ ~I/ Mr. Michael Meacham Conservation Coordinator City of Chula Vista 276 4th Ave. '-.... Chula Vista, CA 91910 Dear Mr. Meacham, We are writing to express our appreciation for the City of Chula Vista's support of our green materials composting facility in Otay Mesa. Our composting facility is located in the Otay Mesa Enterprise Zone and Recycling Market Development Zone. It is the only fully- permitted composting facility in San Diego County. The facility has been in operation since April, 1994 and currently processes approximately 1,500 tons of green waste and wood waste per month. We expect this quantity to increase over the next several months. The City of Chula Vista has been a consistent supporter of this project over the past two years. Your city was very supportive during the permitting process and has been a consistent supplier of feedstock materials. Although we are not located within Chula Vista, you are the largest contributor of green waste and wood waste to our facility. Approximately 50% of all material recycled at this facility originates in Chula Vista. The support of the City of Chula Vista has been vital to the success of this facility. We wish to thank you again for your support and hope that we can be of assistance in helping the City of Chula Vista meet its recycling goals. ~ i:':,-;?-j)'~ r \'7 IS ~~ ;1 tJ) r~'.:~,..l~:,1.~....:.:\ ~,~-~~'L,..fh ~l ~'. , l 1 t I! Ii :.,: 1"lJil~? 3 .... . 1 p'II?, '" H 5) "\ V '- 1.:1" :', .', )) _IoU ,-. ~ 'II I ~ '-... L'....... j C:, I ...,.-.-.-: """"-'-~_~_J Sincerely, Daniel A. Schoen MAIN OFFICE: NEW ENGLAND OFFICE: CANADA OFFICE: 6'4 CORPORATE WAY, VALLEY COTTAGE, N.Y. 10989 P.O. BOX 176, 1SO WAMPANDAG ROAD, EAST GREENWICH, R.t. 02818 '85 GEDDES STREET, ELORA, ONTARIO NOB 150 / J h ~ c; TEL: (9'4)268-0322 TEL: (401) 88'.'455 TEL: (519) 846-8317 FAX: (914) 268-0321 FAX: (401)864-1634 FAX: (519)846-8319 PUBLIC HEARING CHECK LIST PUBLIC HEARING DATE: SUBJECf: 1\"".:. ..' , " "is 12.3>/ cplt '"j--o '~~ "-- f\~fnJ F:-'.o~.~ 't:.~. . +. SENT TO STAR NEWS FOR PUBLICATION -- BY FAX ,/ ; BY HAND ; BY MAIL PUBLICATION DATE ';" /1:::"/<1-). (S~) - MAILED NOTICES TO PROPERTY OWNERS NO. MAILED PER GC ~54992 Legislative Staff, Construction Industry Fed, 6336 Greenwich Dr Suite F. San Diego, 92122 LOGGED IN AGENDA BOOK is Ii"" / c., <.J. COPIES TO: Administration (4) " Planning v' Originating Department Engineering ~ Others City Clerk's Office (2) POST ON BULLETIN BOARDS '6/111'1<1 SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS: 7/93 -55- /1// ./ /0 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL of the City of Chula Vista, California, for the purpose of reviewing and adopting a Nondisposal Facility Element. California Public Resources Code (PRC) , Sections 41730 et seq, requires every California city and county to prepare and adopt a Nondisposal Facility Element (NDFE) for all new Nondisposal Facilities, and any expansions of existing Nondisposal Facilities, which will be needed to implement local Source Reduction and Recycling Elements (SRREs). A Nondisposal Facility is defined as any solid waste facility required to obtain a state solid waste facility permit except a disposal facility or a transformation facility (PRC Section 40151). Specifically, NDFE's would include: transfer stations, material recovery facilities and compo sting facilities. The City of Chu1a Vista has prepared and transmitted a draft NDFE to San Diego County as required by PRC Section 41730. The San Diego County Local Task Force (L TF) reviewed and commented on all San Diego County jurisdiction NDFE's regarding the regional impacts of the Nondisposal Facilities identified in the Elements, in accordance with the requirements of PRC Sections 41734(a) and (b). The final NDFE will be submitted to the County and subsequently the California Integrated Waste Management Board for review and approval. Any petitions to be submitted to the City Council must be received by the City Clerk's office no later than noon of the hearing date. If you wish to challenge the City's action regarding the adoption of the N ondisposal Facility Element, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at or prior to the public hearing. SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL on Tuesday August 23, 1994 at 6;00 p.m. in Council Chambers, Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue, at which time any person desiring to be heard may appear. DATED: AUGUST 10, 1994 COMPLIANCE WITH AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT (ADA) The City of Chula Vista, in complying with the American With Disabilities Act, requests individuals who require special accommodation to access, attend and/or participate in a City meeting, activity or service request such accommodation at least 48 hours in advance for meetings and 5 days for scheduled services and activities. Please contact Nancy Ripley for specific information at (619) 691-5101. California Relay Service is available for the hearing impaired. /3;1-/1 NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING BY THE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL will hold a public hearing to consider the following: Purpose of considering conditional use permit submitted by Bonita Country Day School to establish non-profit academic school @ 625 Otay Lakes Rd within PC zone (Bonita Long Canyon Planned Community). Purpose of reviewing & adopting a Nondisposal Facility Element. A Nondisposal Facility is defined as any solid waste facility required to obtain a state solid waste facility permit except a disposal facility or a transformation facility. If you wish to challenge the City's action on this matter in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk's Office at or prior to the public hearing. SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL on Tuesday, August 23, 1994, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue, at which time any person desiring to be heard may appear. DATED: August 10, 1994 13ft - 1'2- COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item /.:? 11 Meeting Date 8/23/94 TITLE: REPORT: Status Report to the California Integrated Waste Management Board Regarding Solid Waste Diversion Progress as Required by AB 440 SUBMITTED BY: Conservation Coordinator ~,.., -~~ Cj" M'llig~ 1>6 ~'\ (415"" Vol" YM _ No X) REVIEWED BY: BACKGROUND: The California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (AB939) required that all cities and counties prepare formal Integrated Waste Management Plans aimed at waste stream diversion goals of 25 % by 1995 and 50% by the year 2000. Specifically, cities were required to adopt two "elements": one addressing source reduction, recycling, and compo sting programs, the Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE); and the other addressing the elimination of illegal disposal of household hazardous waste, the Household Hazardous Waste Element (HHWE). The City Council adopted those elements on December 15, 1992. Failure to comply with the preparation of a plan and achievement of the waste stream reduction goals may leave a jurisdiction subject to state-imposed fines of up to $10,000 per day. AB440 amended AB 939 to require each local jurisdiction to file a status report with the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB). The purpose of the AB440 status report is to summarize the City's progress towards meeting the 25% diversion goal by 1995, report the City's efforts in establishing waste diversion programs, and report any additional program plans for the immediate future. AB440 further provides that the information furnished by the jurisdictions will not be used for enforcement purposes. The report is due to the CIWMB on or before August 31, 1994. RECOMMENDATION: Approve the report. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The draft report was submitted to the Resource Conservation Commission with an oral report on August 8, 1994 for their review and comment. The Report will be discussed again on August 22, 1994 when the Commission has had a chance to thoroughly review the report. An oral report of the Commission's actions can be given at this Council meeting and a copy of the minutes can be forwarded to Council when available if desired. 130... / Page 2, Item /:J JJ Meeting Date 8/16/94 DISCUSSION: On December 15, 1992 the City Council adopted a Source Reduction and Recycling Element (SRRE) and a Household Hazardous Waste Element (HHW) which were subsequently submitted to the County to be forwarded to the state as part of a Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan. The Countywide Plan is due on or about January 31, 1996. The SRRE outlines a number of waste reduction, recycling and composting programs that the City committed to implement in its efforts to meet the 25% and 50% waste diversion goals mandated by the state. The implementation of these programs is a key factor in the state's evaluation of Chula Vista's AB939 progress. The City's residential curbside and multi-family recycling programs and the residential yard waste collection program were listed in the City's SRRE and have been implemented. These programs currently divert approximately 10% of the total waste stream and have significant potential to divert much more. The City has also provided technical assistance to business offices, the hospitality industry and hospitals to develop and implement source reduction and recycling programs. Technical assistance to businesses has produced substantial diversion that cannot be accurately quantified without additional SRRE program implementation. Additionally, the City has begun to routinely apply source reduction, recycling and composting principles to City operations. Those principles have lead to a variety of practices including: the City's office recycling program and the purchase and use of post -consumer content recycled products. The other key factor in evaluating diversion goals is a comparison of the total tons of solid waste disposed of at a landfill from one year to the next. This comparison is subject to adjustment for changes in population, and economic conditions. In 1990, Chula Vista had a population of approximately 135,163 residents and disposed of 179,986 tons of waste. The SRRE projected that, in 1994, the City of Chula Vista would have a population of 145,963 and would dispose of 194,459 tons of waste. The attached report will substantiate that in fiscal year 1993-94 the City had a population of approximately 147,300 residents and disposed of only 123,078 tons of waste. That represents a 56,908 ton (31.6%) reduction from 1990 and a 71,381 ton (36.7%) reduction from the 1994 waste disposal projection. The actual waste reduction achieved is a result of a combination of factors including: residential recycling and yard waste collection programs, backyard composting programs, the City's office recycling program, technical assistance to businesses, source reduction programs, public education and awareness programs, market development programs, population growth and economic conditions that effect the amount of waste generated. J;JP-;;" Page 3, Item J.J IJ Meeting Date 8/16/94 The reduction in actual tons of waste disposed of at landfills indicates that the City is well on its way to achieving the 25% and 50% diversion mandates, however, only 10% of the City's efforts and the 36.7% total diversion can be readily quantified. It is important for the City to implement the programs necessary to quantify and support the remaining 26.7% existing diversion, document future progress towards the 50% diversion mandate and meet the state reporting requirements. FISCAL IMPACT: Approval of this report and subsequent submittal will have no fiscal impact. mtm:c AB440rpt-rev Attachments 1,10..3 G ~ , ~ ATTACHMENT AB 440 Status Report SRRE Program Implementation Efforts (Not for Enforcement Purposes) Jurisdiction: County: Coutact: Phone: City ofChula Vista San Diego Michael Meacham, Conservation Coord. (619) 691-5122 ph (619)585-9118 fax SECTION 1: Pleasejill in all boxes: A B c D SWGS Base SWGS Fiscal Year SWGS year (1990) Excluded 1993/94 Projected 1995 Totals (Tons) Waste ActualTons Tons Solid Waste Generation Studv (SWGS): (Tons) (after diversion) 1. Disposed: 179,986 18,812 123,078.841 149,134 2. Diverted: 14,071 I -0- 3. Generated: 194,057 18,812 SWGS Notes: IThe tonnage listed in column C is based on a fiscal year 1993/94 disposal report from the regional landfill system which includes the County of San Diego and the City of San Diego. In 1990 Chu1a Vista had a population of approximately 135,163 residents and disposed of 179,986 tons of waste. The SRRE projected that in 1994 the City of Chu1a Vista would have a population of 145,963 and would dispose of 194,459 tons of waste. This AB440 report will substantiate that in fiscal year 1993-94 the City had a population of approximately 147,300 residents and disposed of only 123,078 tons of waste. That represents a 56,908 ton (31.6%) reduction from 1990 and a 71,381 ton (36.7%) reduction from the 1994 waste disposal projection. The City is evaluating and developing a proposed permit/reporting process that will support the collection marketing and processing of recyclables for the City's commercial, industrial and institutional generators. The City does not receive diversion reports for commercial generators and has no control over the flow of non-city institutional waste or industrial waste, and does not receive waste characterization and disposition information regarding it or related diversion. The City will make every effort to assure that any required reporting process is consistent with and supplemental to the state's proposed reporting process. Pagel 12130/93 SECTION 2: Please Check ( J All Applic.bIe Bolles in Columns A. B. D. " F PlfUlS8 Provide Applicable Dal. in Boxes in Columns C;. E. G. II H 11 Known . RECYCLING: Data Input Example # 1 Data Input Example #2 (residential sector) curbside collection source separation co-mingled materials drop-off centers buy-back centers intermediate process centers manual MRF mechanized MRF landfill salvage . transfer station salvage zoning changes building code changes rate structure modifications ~ ~ \ '" procurement programs (commercial sector) source separation salvage operations zoning changes building code changes rate structure modifications procurement programs market development RMDZ Other local programs: ])\.';.. . .-,-, k'(( !(\, ~ (~: A,<\-, \1"",;( I c o . F G H . .' Funded ""d/o. Opereted by the Jurl8dk:llon X Date To Be Implemented lmm/yyl Ton. Diverted 119931 Base-yeat to current 119941 Date ImplementllCi (mmlyyl Oate IlilpIemented . (mm/yyl Planned 11994+ I Exlstlng .. of B_-y..t 1,950 9/88 X 12/97 X )( x ,/91 SJl. S , )( U'\i(-i-':"--.j/\ . 'v' i' )( r:: ,11 b , '-:.'. Iv //1 v' \ , ~' 1 ,'I )( I-I !7_~ '. /0 ,ti . Y 1/7, "! :t. )( I::' jq::. X'i":'; 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 2. X \.J1-':<\~IC," ;"_ ./ , Ie : '~" .. . " ,: I,;. q~ !,h X Sis'i ~h -, X I::::)h , If ;' ., 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 .. b <:~ ,2 .. ~ ,. 0 is:: II II ILJ /"1i. II II x. II Page 2 ~ \\ c..ALI>1AX I II II II Jf.... II '&J"I~ II II I~~ . . . C D , , G H . \ \ c- ., Funded .'" . and/or Exlsti/lg ... of Date . Bas_,year to Date Planned Date To Be TOO$ Operated bV bnplumented . current Implemented lmp~ed Diverted the . Base-year (mmlyyl .. 119941 Imm/yyl (1994+1 Immfyvl 119931 . COMPOSTING: . .. Jurisdiction .. ............ I. ....... .... .. .... ..... .. backyard composting 23 ..)( tiN v,~ k-)~<),"\)..j regional facility 24 - source separated 25 centralized facility 26 - source separated 27 X I/'VI '--(COG A,..j;;':""'l mixed wastes 28 sludge 29 market development 30 y. 1.l !'i'j Vi,,; i( .........Y,.~!, end-use market development 31 v 'i / q 'l -~ "-;.'0 I) f.*" RMDZ 32 ~ "'u \ L 2 " ~ , ~ Other local programs: IB8BB8aB ... Funded . ) )> ... r. ..> ...... ..,d/or , Base-v..... to Date ... Oate To Be Tons. .... .. Operated by Exlsti/lg... of Implemented current. .. . fmplemented Planned Itnplememed Diverted .... the IBa~!:~l!u ... .....(mm/yy) 119941 Imm/yyl.... !1994+ I lmmlvyl 119931 SPECIAL WASTES: . Jlll'isdictlon I.................... ....... ) I..... ... ..' .. Construction IDemolition 33 X (,,1 q '.J \.J\",-k\-r.\;~~ Tires 34 Sludge 35 Ash 36 market development 37 end markets development 38 " '-1' ,Y Vl....lrc'i~.../ N RMDZ 39 . . c D , , G H 2 2 II II . Other local programs: II II II II II Page 3 12/30/93 II II II II II " II ...... ii .....i}.........i. '..ii... ............,;~:~!;'. .} I....,.,:....i....,.,..! .'.-' I ...... '.............. ......... iiii:' ......".../..;) .f'lII!ded .... 'D8t.. B_.y..r to ....'O.te....... .'. Pilrined Date To Be Tons ".,-,. ...............'..'.i.../? and/or . . .8.01 Implemented current Implemented l"aaA _I Implemented Diverted Operated ." .. 'c. . '..,.i' ui:Y ....ii ... . ...'....;:....'.......:11 Bi' I,,!~li 119941 '. lmm/yyli'. (('i'. Immlyyl 119931 :",::.",,,;,;;:;,-.-:- -.>C- ::":;'::",\':::::-'.':':": : .." '.., .' Wood wastes 40 X oee 41 X Mixed Paper 42 >< Glass 43 X Plastics 44 "<- Food wastes 45 market development 46 X I;;> I"''' end markets development 47 >< RMDZ 48 >< X- I::" 1'iS: "'-LA . . c . . . H Other local programs: IBBB~B~~ ~ , "'-J Notes: 2The City does not currently receive recycling/diversion reports from commercial generators or their recycling agents and has no control over the flow of non-city institutional waste or industrial waste. The City is evaluating and developing a proposed permit/reporting process that will support the collection marketing and processing of recyclables for the City's commercial, industrial and institutional generators. The reporting process would provide better data on the amounts and types of materials being diverted. The report data will assist the reporting process and the flow of recovered materials to the City's CALMAX program and other potential end market activities. The City will make every effort to assure that any required reporting process is consistent with and supplemental to the state's proposed reporting process. Page 4 12/30/93 1 "