HomeMy WebLinkAbout1994/08/23 Item 5
August 18, 1994
SUBJECT:
The Honorable Mayor and City coun~t:
John D. Goss, City Manage~~~\
City Council Meeting of August 23, 1994
TO:
FROM:
This will transmit the agenda and related materials for the regular City Council
meeting of Tuesday, August 23, 1994. Comments regarding the Written
Communications are as follows:
Sa/b. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT ADRIEN MYERS' RESIGNATION FROM THE RESOURCE
CONSERVATION COMMISSION AND JANET RICHTER'S RESIGNATION FROM THE BOARD OF
ETHICS BE ACCEPTED WITH REGRET AND THE CITY CLERK BE DIRECTED TO POST
IMMEDIATEL Y ACCORDING TO THE MADDY ACT IN THE CLERK I S OFFICE AND THE
PUBLIC LIBRARY.
Sc. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY FILED BY RAQUEL REAL
HERNANDEZ, MARIA PULIDO, THEOLA JOYCE SMITH, MEGAN SMITH AND HILDA JORDAN
BE DENIED.
Sd. This is a letter from Claudia Diamond, C.C.& R. Property Investments,
requesting an opportunity to address the City Council on issues affecting
her neighborhood (i.e., Rancho del Rey SPA III improvements along Paseo
Ranchero). Specifically, Ms. Diamond wishes to express concerns about
potential environmental impacts of a proposed recreational trail, noise
and road connections. The overall development is subject to a final map,
expected to come before the City Council in September. Since the EIR and
grading plans have been approved, grading could begin upon administrative
approval of a grading permit (although it is not anticipated to be9in
until October). IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE LETTER BE ACCEPTED AND ANY
ORAL COMMENTS BE TAKEN VIA "ITEMS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR", AND
THAT STAFF BE DIRECTED TO ADDRESS MS. DIAMOND'S ISSUES IN THEIR REPORT TO
THE CITY COUNCIL ON THIS MATTER.
JDG:mab
August 1, 1994
..ECEIVED
,-
l"I -~f". 7)'-;;~-"':c; "-;O;--r51
Hi': \'j [ i;', t ~ n \ I
H),} ~=- ~-"- - - '''1! :; ] ;
! \~', .,: ! \ ~ 1 ; I
Ii " tAUS - 4 :~~..l :;;, J
[3'M !I.,,,
L. ._~~
C:..
I ~ __'<_
Honorable Tim Nader, Mayor
Chula Vista City Council
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista ,CA 91910
.. U 11 A10:51
MemberlTY OF CHULA VISTA
an CLERK'S OFFICE
I'
Dear Mayor Nader and Council Members:
Thank you for the opportunity to serve on the Resource
Conservation Commission since November 1992. Even though my
appointed term expires June 30, 1995, I will not be able to serve
until that date.
In a few weeks,
evening classes.
I will return to full time teaching. I also take
I simply do not have the time.
In addition to not having time, I do not feel comfortable on the
Resource Conservation Commission; I see my role and the function
of the commission very differently from the majority of the RCC
members. It is in the best interest of all concerned that I
resign.
The members of Resource Conservation Commission and of the Chula
Vista City Council would do well to consider the following:
"Only after the last tree has been cut down. Only after the
last river has been poisoned. Only after the last fish has
been caught. Only then will you find that money cannot be
eaten." --Cree Indian Prophecy
Very sincerely,
{~~~
Adrien Myers
1890 Ithaca Street
Chula Vista, CA j"
cc: Cindy Burrascano, Chair
Resource Conservation Commission
cc
'7~~ ~~/{JW'RITTEN COMMUNICAT'Q~
, /' / /t:rz 2J d,S/ 7}/
~ ~~~ ~,/
-
Janet M. Richter
ATTORNEY AT LAW RECEIVED
Clamber of Commerce Buildina
231 Foul1h Avenue
Oaula VilLi, California 91910
"N U 12 AlO ':2.7
Phone (619)426-5241
Fax (619) 426-6666
.TY.OF CHUlA VIST. A.
.., CLERK'S OFFICI
i
August 4, 1994
City of Chula Vista
City Attorney's Office
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Attention: Lorraine Kraker
Dear Lorraine:
This letter will serve to notify the Board of Ethics that
I have resigned from my position as Vice Chair on this
commission effective July 6, 1994.
Were I not moving from the City of Chula Vista I would gladly
continue to serve in this capacity. Please convey my good wishes
to my fellow board members and the best of luck in all their work.
Thank you for all your help and patience and I will surely
visit when next in town.
"'"00'0;' (J
Ja"et~Lte'
J/
14 Prince Charles Drive
Toms River, N.J. 08757
-) -,
LC-
; (?z5 7s~ (t-I)
0A)~.
A"0J. ~ -1~
Y tP.("/7rf8 # < \
C1~ .rO.t;;\,,,
...... ,',-. ~- ., ~ ,.~ '... "
---t AUG7... -
/j -< ..., .~
- - C/l't 4'." i~; ~')1
Chu/i] ,.'.
nCtN5
;;6 ?/;? ';I-
/~ // .'
56'1
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
5'c-
Meeting Date 8/23/94
ITEM TITLE:
Claims Against the city
SUBMITTED BY:
Director of Per onnel~
(4/5ths Vote: Yes___ No~)
REVIEWED BY:
city Manage
Ms. Raquel Real Hernandez
Ms. Maria Pulido
Ms. Theola Joyce Smith
Ms. Megan Smith, a Minor
c/o Law Offices of Leon Pizante
9454 wilshire Blvd. Penthouse
Beverly Hills, CA 90212
Four claims were filed against the City on July 12, 1994 on behalf of
the above claimants, Ms. Raquel Real Hernandez, Ms. Maria pulido, Ms.
Theola Joyce smith and Ms. Megan Smith, a minor. The claimants seek damages
of $100,000.00 each for personal injuries allegedly received when a Chula
vista Transit bus was struck by a vehicle running a red light on June 24,
1994 at the Palomar Street Trolley Lot.
Claimant No.1:
Claimant No.2:
Claimant No.3:
Claimant No.4:
City bus service was provided contractually by San Diego Transit at
the time of this incident. The agreement between San Diego Transit and the
City contained a hold harmless clause and provides for indemnification.
Because the City has neither jurisdiction nor control over transit com-
plaints, it is the recommendation of the City Attorney and Risk Management
staff that these four claims be denied.
Claimant No.5: Ms. Hilda Jordan
c/o Filicia & Pasternack
7676 Hazard Center Drive, suite 800
San Diego, CA 92108
On August 4, 1994, an Application for Leave to Present Late Claim was
filed against the city of Chula vista. The attached claim for $25,000.00
alleged Ms. Hilda Jordan was injured when she slipped in a puddle of water
at Loma Verde Community Pool on August 5, 1993. The claim states the city is
responsible for the incident due to failure to operate, maintain and manage
the subject premises.
Ms. Jordan's Application for Leave to Present Late Claim states the
reason for her failure to file a claim within the statutory six month time
period was "excusable neglect on the part of the claimant". An attached
Declaration indicates Ms. Jordan was "unaware of any claim requirement other
than the one year statute of limitations". The same day the claim was filed,
attorneys for Ms. Jordan filed a lawsuit in Municipal Court which was served
on the City on August 10, 1994.
Form A-113 (Rev. 11/79)
5G-/
Item
Meeting Date
5c-
8/23/94
Because of the excessive delay in submitting this claim, and
of questionable liability, it is recommended by the city Attorney
Management staff that the Application for Leave to Present Late
denied.
because
and Risk
Claim be
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Deny claims 1 through 4.
2. Deny Application for Leave to Present
Late Claim filed by Ms. Hilda Jordan.
j
5c"'~
REDllUIOND CONSULTING GRO
OO~("" ,~. ".,~
I" . , \
,; .. . j'l1
D r, _,,_u,u'_,"u 1,' 'i!
1 .' iff
U1 AUG 16 b-'l :0
L.,.,-.___ ..', -.cJ I'
CIIIL,'.. _."~_~
c;"r...i~t,.. .-rp LA
A DIVlSION OF CC& R PROPERTY INVESTMENTS, INC.
lit .. 18 5A1U..,JraPh Canyon Rd. Ste. # 145 Chula Vista, CA. 91910
, Office: (619) 421-4121 FlU: (619)-421-5628
my OF CHULA VISTA
., ClERK'S OFFICE
\'
TO: Mayor Tim Nader and the City Council
276 Fourth Ave.
Chula Vista, CA 91910
August 15, 1994
Dear Mr. Nader and City Council Members,
I would like to request an opportunity to address the Council at the meeting of August 23rd regard-
ing issues which affect my neighborhood. The presentation will be limited to 10 minutes maxi-
mum.
Thanking you in advance.
Sincerely,
/i Ii' il/ j,' .: 1< I'" ' fIt
v..Jia~ ul, , /IcCd ),i_ti~d.. 1(' /.0' ,'.'l '"
Cl iaJ. Diamond RN, BA, MPH
President, CC&R Property Investments, Inc.
P.S. My heartfelt thanks to the wonderful firefighters who, on this very day, contained the fire
which began just east of Paseo Ranchero and spread very quickly due to the winds. Their rapid
response prevented what could have been a real tragedy on both sides of the road
)
ce. U, - YlJ-- (L/)
~~
WRlnEN COMMUN1CAl10,~~S
/cn ~Jh7
St:f., I
DIAMOND CONSULTING GROUP
A DIVISION OF CC& R PROPERTY INVESTMENTS, INC.
539 Telegl1lph Canyon Rd. Ste. # 145 Chula Vista, CA. 91910
Office; (619) 421-4121 Fax; (619)-421-5628
TO: Mayor Tim Nader and the City Council
276 Fourth Ave.
Chula Vista, CA 91910
August 15, 1994
Dear Mr. Nader and City Council Members,
With regards to my attached request, the following are my areas of concern:
* During construction, what provisions have been made to keep the homes in my development
free from noise, dirt and construction traffic?
* What environmental impact studies, if any, have been done?
* Is a sidewalk or recreational trail planned for the area?
* A minimum speed of 45 MPH through a residential area seems to be a bit excessive,
I look forward to meeting with you next week.
Sincerely,
ClUid~~.< "~T1--txd~7)f)(Y7 mPII
clauk{ Diamond RN, BA, MPH
President, CC&R Property Investments, Inc.
5"01, ;J...
Concerns
of the
Villa Palmera
Home Owners Association
Presentation by:
Claudia J. Diamond RN, SA, MPH
August 23, 1994
5't/ -"?J
DIAMOND CONSULTING GROUP
A DIVISION OF CC& R PROPERTY INVESTMENTS, INC.
539 Telegraph Canyon Rd. Ste. # 145 Chula Vista, CA. 91910
Office: (619) 421-4121 Fax: (619)-421-5628
TO: Mayor Tim Nader and the City Council
276 Fourth Ave.
Chula Vista, CA 91910
August 23, 1994
Dear Mr. Mayor and City Council,
The major concerns of my presentation are as follows:
. Lack of notification of the public hearing approving the Tentative Map
for Rancho del Rey SPA III
. Plans for a recreational/horse trail on the west side of Paseo Ranchero
. Redesignation of Paseo Ranchero to a 'Class I Collector Street'
. EIRs; what, where and when?
. Construction timetable, provIsions made by McMillan (and the City of
Chula Vista) to ensure health and safety of the residents of Villa Palmera
(Mission Verde)
1. Resolution 16222 (Attachment A) approving the Tentative Map for
Rancho del Rey SPA III is NOT correct in stating that the notice for a
public hearing was mailed to property owners within 300' of the
development. We did not receive this notice and therefore were not given
the opportunity to receive and comment on the proposed development. As
much as we enjoy being an oasis in the middle of nowhere (Attachment B),
let the record state that we are not opposed to the houses. Our concern, in
part, is so stated in #2 below.
2. Resolution 16222 (Attachment C) tentative condition #12 is quite
nebulous.
'.J {_d
,
A. Is the intention to construct a wide commercial type sidewalk for
pedestrians or to construct a natural pathway for horses? Who is the
interpretation left up to; the City or McMillan?
B. Condition # 12 indicates that this wide sidewalk or recreational
trail is a connecting link between 2 major trail systems (Rice Canyon and
Telegraph Canyon). Are these systems designated by the City as
equestrian, bike, hiking or a combination of all 3?
C. Can Paseo Ranchero be a major connecting link by simply
constructing a commercial width sidewalk?
D. According to the City's 'Class I Collector Streets' definitions
(Attachment D), 8 (eight) foot wide sidewalks are constructed on 4 (four)
lane and 6 (six) lane major streets in commercial areas, not in residential
areas.
E. Is the real plan to construct a temporary concrete trail and replace
it with a soft surface such as decomposed granite (DG)? What protection
do we have from that occuring on Paseo Ranchero, which is the missing
link? A DG trail is proposed on Paseo Ranchero both north and south of
Villa Palmera, but in the area along Paseo Ranchero that passes alongside
Villa Palmera, the DG trail is suspiciously absent. (Attachment E).
F. Condition 30 refers to the sign program identifying the trail network
in the open space areas and connecting along Paseo Ranchero and Condition
31 refers to the equestrian type fencing, both are found in the same
Resolution #16222 (Attachment F).
G. Isn't the City currently studying a plan to upgrade and expand the use
of its trail systems? That is, connecting the Bonita area with the
Olympic Training Center?
H. Is there a City Ordinance or any law prohibiting horses from using
concrete sidewalks that have been designated as recreational pathways?
Will horses be allowed to travel on or adjacent to Paseo Ranchero, say in
the proposed bike lane?
I. Does the City have any health codes with regards to horses; i.e. prox-
imity to nonpublic residences and excrement (and the disposal thereof).
J. 1) Most of the City trails, including recreational pathways, are
constructed in city open space lots and maintained through open space
maintenance districts. Why can't this major "trail system link" be
constructed in the city open space lot proposed along the easterly side of
Paseo Ranchero? (Attachment G). Would this interfere with the "buffer
area" for the new McMillan Homes proposed easterly of Paseo Ranchero?
(If this "trail link" is to be within city open space, it should be included
now so that maintenance costs are estimated now and disclosed when new
5 cl- s-
units are first sold. It will be almost impossible to increase
maintenance assessments after the first year). Tentative
#12 (of Resolution 16222) refers to the Public Facilities
Attachment H, clearly states that all of the trail system
maintained through the Open Space Maintenance District.
if the trail is NOT in open space?
J. 2) With the above in mind, there is clearly no "open space" or
"buffer area" on the west side of Paseo Ranchero. (Attachment I). The
homeowners of Villa Palmera were never notified of this as a plan or
possibilty, nor were they informed of any associated maintenance costs or
the possibilty thereof. (Attachment J).
Map Condition
Financing Plan.
will be
Is this possible
3. When constructed, the original intent of Paseo Ranchero was as a
connector between East "H" St. (to the north) and Telegraph Canyon Rd. (to
the south). East "J" St. was to be the major road carrying the burden of
traffic. The homes built along East "J" St. were indeed built further back
from the road. The houses along Paseo Ranchero are closer to the street.
A. The original plan (traffic circulation) was for a minimum design
speed of 40 MPH on Paseo Ranchero. (Attachment K). The design speed has
been upgraded to a minimum of 45 MPH with the new street design
standards. (Refer to aforementioned Attachment D). With a minimum of
45 MPH, there is no doubt that speeds in excess of 55 MPH will regularly
be attained through the neighborhood. These are acceptable speeds on the
highways, NOT through communities where children walk and houses are
near the roads. What about a guard rail or other barrier, such as a wall, to
protect ex i st i n q down slope residents along Paseo Ranchero from out of
control vehicles, hoodlums or horses using the "recreational trail"?
8. Circulo Verde, the PRIVATE road which runs through the existing
Villa Palmera Development has a speed limit of 5 MPH. (Attachment L).
What plans have been proposed to protect the residents from public
access? Certainly it has been anticipated by the City, that a turn onto
Circulo Verde from Paseo Ranchero at a minimal speed of 45 MPH would
have tragic, if not deadly results.
C. How can a minimal speed of 45 MPH be approved when two schools
will be in the area? An elementary school located at East "J" and Paseo
Ranchero and just east of this intersection, located on East "J" St., a sec-
ondary school. McMillan's proposed project includes in excess of 1300
new residences. In addition to the existing homes in the entire area, how
can the City responsibly allow children to walk along streets where cars
will be driving at highway speeds? What is the speed designation in the
sJ-h
vicinity of the schools? Can one presume 25 MPH? If so, how can a
vehicle, reasonably be expected to slow down to 25 MPH or stop, if the
minimum is 45 MPH? In a court of law, these are clearly conditions which
could reasonably be anticipated and for which, it would seem, the City
would be held liable.
D. With the redesignation of the street to 'Class 1 Collector',
changes to the road are deemed necessary to accommodate the increased
flow and speed of traffic. 300 (three hundred) feet of East "J" (from
Paseo Ranchero west) has to be redug and dropped 1 1/2 (one and one half)
feet. To accommodate the new street design and trail, private landscap-
ing, established trees, irrigation systems, stairs, curbs, pedestrian
ramps, etc. are to be removed. (Attachment M #16 highlighted, for
example). The existing public and private improvements were approved by
the city and constructed over 5 (five) years ago. Once again I refer you to
(Attachment C), Condition 14. c. which refers to the Mission Verde
subdivision and indicates that "existing conditions shall remain". If
the street were not redesignated a 'Class 1 Collector' to accommodate
higher speeds these street improvements would not be necessary. With
14. c. above, it seems that changes cannot be made which would indeed
affect Villa Palmera.
4. What, if any EIRs, have been done for the area surrounding the Mission
Verde project? Any EIRs done prior to the change in street status, will be
of no value.
A. In addition to the proposed city open space buffer for the McMillan
homes, Condition 23 (a) of Resolution 16222 (Attachment N) shows need
for additional buffer from traffic noise on Paseo Ranchero (directly
across from Villa Palmera), due to the upgrade to a higher design speed.
There was NOT any such concern or reference for a buffer (such as a noise
wall) for the existing residences of Villa Palmera, despite the fact that
the existing residences will be exposed to the sam e traffic! Has the need
for a traffic sound barrier been DroDerlv investigated?
B. It is reasonable to compare Villa Palmera to Park Bonita (Resolu-
tion 15388) which is located on "E" St. at Bonita Rd. :
"E" St. is designated a 'Class 1 Collector Street' (at Park Bonita),
the same as Paseo Ranchero. The Tentative Map Conditions for Park Bonita
required a sound barrier. Condition 2 of Resolution 15388, required a 6
(six) foot high solid masonry wall with pilasters and Condition 7, of the
same Resolution, required the noise barrier wall to reduce the noise level
to 45 dB-A. (Attachment 0). Prior to occupancy, the interior noise was to
Sd- 7
be rechecked to assure that the level be 45dB-A or less. Why has this not
been required and considered for the existing residences of Villa Palmera?
5. With regards to the upcoming construction, what provisions have been
made for the residents of Villa Palmera?
A. To date, I have been informed by McMillan that the pump station
will be removed; however no time frame has been provided. Per the Villa
Palmera Disclosure (Attachment J), the area which the pump station now
occupies will be turned over to the Homeowners by the City. How does
this process occur and with whom?
B. How does McMillan plan to maintain the habitability of the resi-
dents of Villa Palmera during the entire construction period and after-
wards? There is nothing in Resolution 16222 which addresses the health
and safety of the existing residents of Villa Palm era. Our concerns
include, but are not limited to: 1) noise, 2) construction traffic, 3) dirt.
C. The private road within the development was resurfaced in July.
How does McMillan intend to keep construction traffic out of the road?
D. Is he planning on storing construction trucks and trailers on Paseo
Ranchero or East "J" St., that is on the streets directly surrounding Villa
Palmera?
E. How is McMillan going to keep construction dust and dirt out of the
Villa Palmera neighborhood? Construction is going to affect the commun-
ity on every side. (Attachment Pl. A clause needs to be included re: wind
in excess of a specific MPH; that dirt moving should cease. Who will
regulate this?
F. How will McMillan ensure reasonable decibel levels for the
residents of Villa Palmera during construction? How will this be
monitored and by whom?
I appreciate your time, attention and concern regarding these issues. If
any or all of you would like to see the community on whose behalf I am
here representing, please don't hesitate to contact me. I look forward to
a rapid and satisfactory resolution of the issues at hand.
~~~'~i3fIJhf1f-
Claudi . Diamond RN, BA, MPH
President, Vii Palmera Home Owners Association
President, CC&R Property Investments, Inc.
-501- Z'
ATTACHMENTS
5-d-1
.....-
fLAil
"
t
t
ItESOLtrrION NO. ''''J,.~')..
~OLUTION OF ~ CITY COUNCIL 01 THE CITY OF CHOLA
VXSTA APPROVING THE '1'ENTATlVE SUBDIVISION HAP FOR '
UNCHO DEL JlEY SECTIONAL PLANNING J\RU. (SP,A) , III, CHOLA
VXSTA 'l'RAC'l' '0-02
.
. .ft~~, a duly v.rlfl.d application for a t.ntativ.
.ubdlvlaion aap va. fil.d vith the Plannin9 D.partment of the
city of Cbula V!ata on November I, un by Rancho del Rey
Partnarahip, and
~, aaid application r.quest.d the .ubdivision of
approxiaat.ly 40S acres into r.sidential lot., open .pace areas,
a achool lot, park and community purpose facility lot, and
~, the Plannin9 Commis.ion b.ld an adv.rtised public
b.arln; on aaid proj.ct on May 8, 1991, and continued to May 22,
un, and
1IBEREAS, the City council .et the time and plac. for a
b.arln; on aald t.ntatlv.aubdivision .ap application and notice
of aaid b.arin;, tQgether with its purpose, was ;iv.n by it.
PUblication in a n.wspaper of veneral circulation in the city and
its .ailin9 to property owner. within 300 f.e~ of,the .xterior
boundari.. of the property at least t.n days PFlor to the
b.arin;, and ,',
WHEREAS, the b.arln9 wa. beld at the time and place a.
adv.rti.ed, namely 1:00 p.m., June 18, 1991, in the Council
Chamber., 276 Fourth Av.nue, before the city council and .aid
b.aring va. th.r.after clo.ed, and
~, the City council r.certifi.d EIR-89-10, with
Statement of OVerridin9 consideration., and a..ociat.d Miti9ation
Xonitorin; ProqrlLJD for Rancho del R.y SPA III.
!lOW ~RJ:, BE 1'1' RESOLVED '1'BAT '!'HE CITY' COUNCIL find. as
follows: "
Pur.uant ~ S.ction 66413.5 of the Subdivision Map Act, the
~antativ. aubdivlalon map for Rancho d.l R.y S.ctional Plannin9
Ar.a (SPA) III, Chul. vi.ta 'l'ract no. '0-D2, I. found to be in
conforaanc. vith the various .lem.nt. of the City'S G.n.ral Plan
.
....d on the followln9:
1. 'l'h. aite is physically suitable for r..idential
development and the propo.a1 conform. to all standard.'
..tabli.bed by the City for auch project..
1
s d -I iJ
.
,
;<
n.l1..L ... '-' n v u.c,.l.i n.c,.l
\:) r .n.. .1.1.1
, ' , ~'.
~~
PiRoiL-,
........
Vi
~
-
-
y ,~, :t,
LEGEND. . /.<" ,.,{
. . ,. .---'-(~<' _' :-,.:.~-Co;-';~.~0 ",'
SHEET. NO.c-:-:-, , ,.. ~ . .
SH~ET;..LU,I.ITS;.'; >:'~1 il" ~,^;f ~
STREET'L:IGHT--'-''''/',":C-''U.''ii
FIRE HYDRANT~;~:_~~:~ ,. .
. LOT .LINE ---:-:- ~ ---'--
SEWER MA (N .:.....i..:...: '~.'.:2 .:...0.-' .
WATER MAIN ':.'n"~:':'T-"
RECLAIMED WATER MAIN-': -~-
'-'.
"-'i
[ ,
Ri]
~-
~
,---
LOT 12
I
I
~
~.
<!l
~
...~'
I-
."
8
7~OT 7
~M.~
MAP No. b4o~OqO~2a
'. KEY. M#'
SCALE. I' . 400'
CITY ENGINEER SHALL;OESIGN ALL STRUCTURAL STREET
IC STREETS. STRUCTURAL SECTION DESIGN SHALL BE
VALUE METHOD SPECIFIED BY THE CITY ENGINEER.
LL BE PERFORMED BY A'. REG I STEREO C I V I L ENG I NEER
fESSIONAL. ACTIVITY IS PERFORMING SUCH TESTS.
L BE PROVIDED TO THE CITY BY THE DEVELOPER IN
LOCATIONS AND .TIMES AS, DETERMINED BY THE.CITY
EAVY GRADING IS PROPOSED, GATHERING OF SAMPLES
UNTIL ROUGH SUBGRADE IS MADE. MINIMUM BASE
TREET CLASSIFICATIONS SHALL BE FOUR (4) INCHES.
L CONFORM TO FINE PROCESSED MISCELLANEOUS BASE.
AS SET FORTH.INTHE STANDARD SPECIFICATIONS FOR
TRUCTION. SECTION 200-2.5, 1991 EDITION. ALL
JRFACES SHALL BE SEAL-COATED IN ACCORDANCE WITH
: T~t:" Rt:"t110NAI SUPPLt:"I.tt:"NT AUt:"NOUt:"NT~
FIRE NOTES
I.
THE FIRE FLOW REOUIREMENT SHALL BE A MINIMUM 2,500 GPM FOR TWO
(2) HOURS DURATION BASED ON A MINIMUM OF 20 P.S. I. RESIDUAL
OPERATION PRESSURE IN THE STREET MAIN FROM WHICH THE FLOW IS
MEASURED AT THE TIME OF MEASUREMENT.
EACH FIRE HYDRANT SHALL HAVE ONE (I) 4' OUTLET AND TWO (2) '~/2'
OUTLETS. INSTALLATION SHALL BE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE STANDARD
SPEC I F I CAT IONS. .
PROTECTION OF FIRE HYDRANTS TO BE PROVIDED ANO MAINTAINED AT ALL.
TIMES.
WATER SUPPLIES FOR FIRE PROTECTION TO BE PROVIDED PRIOR TO ANY.
COMBUSTIBLE CONSTRUCTION MATERIAL BEING PLACED ON THE SITE.
, :",,(;j
. ;,,~\;
, <r:jf 16/
-'>,o;":,~'~
2.
3.
4.
~ ;.-.
l
*
'r'
12. ~e developeT ,ha~~ be responsible for r~nstruct10n of an a~
expanded . tL ~O foot wide sidewalk/rec. ational athwa _long .
the western s de 0 Paseo Ranchero, 0 connect the trail systems
In the .outh le~ of ~ce Canyon and in the Telegraph Canyon Roa~
open .pace are.. These im rovements shal sta 1
oonjunctio e construe on hases of
. e4 the Pub t es nancin
13. ~e developer shall be responsible for the construction of wider
.idewalks at transit stops, subject to the approval of the City
En~inear.
c'... '~e final design of paseo Ranchero shall include eight foot wide
lendscape aasement buffers as required by the ttreet Dea19ft .
standards or be adjoined by an open space lot .t least eight
feet vide with .lopes no greater than 5:1." "--~'l~. ~h.
following areas where the final desi9ft shall be subject to the
approval of the planning Director, Landscape Architect and City
En9inear:
a. Adjacent to the lots fronting on Cabo Calabazo, Calle
candelero and Punto Miraleste where a special slope and
retaining wall design will be implemented;
b. ~on9 the Junior High School site;
'". < ~ong the exisUng Laden Vill.. and If"-..r<-...........
.ul:l4ivis1ons . r_cnln_.lI1Ir.t.~_,,"_1 My and
d. Adjacent to the out~parcel owned by the Chula Vista School
District.
.15.
The final design of East "J" Street shall include 5.5 foot wide
landscape easement butfers as requlred by the Street Design
Standards or be adjoined by an open space lot at least 5.5 feet
wide with 5:1 maximum side slope., except in the following
location. where the final design shall be SUbject to the
approval of the Planning Director, Landscap. Architect and City
En~ineer:
'.
a. Alon~ the park site;
b. Along the two corner lots at the intersection of East "J"
street and camino Miel (lot. 82 and " of Phase 2, Unit 1)
and the .outheast corner lot of East "J" Street and Cabo
capote (lot .5 of Phase 2, Unit 2);
c. Adjacent to the out-parcel owned by the Chula Vista School
District; and
d. Alon9 -the exisUng BelAire Ridge sul:l4ivision where
axistin9 conditions .hall remain.
.
All retaining walls which interface with the public street
.yst.. shall be constructed to match the Ranch Rancho del Rey
SPA III Design Guideline standards for exterior walls.
\\
11&.
Sd-I~
5...,q~lN-~~mf!'ME'TS
1\ 1)/1
,~
Design ADT
~inimum design speed
Curb-to-curb
Right-of-way
f.laximum grade
Minimum curve radius
22,000
45 mph
74'
94'
8~
700' with 5~ superelevation to 1100' with no
superelevation
,
Class I collector streets serve primarily to circulate localized traffic
and to distribute traffic to and from arterials and major streets. Class
I collectors' are designed to accommodate four lanes of traffic, however,
they carry lower traffic volumes at slower speeds than major arterials,
arid'they have a continuous left turn lane separating the two directions of
traffic flow. Typically, intersections shall be spaced no closer than 660
feet unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer and signalized
intersections shall be spaced at one-quarter mile intervals.
Access to arid from this Class I collector street from abutting properties
shall typically be controlled but not restricted. No direct access from
single-family residential homes is allowed. In developed area of the City
di fect access from si ngl e-fami ly homes coul d be a 11 owed with approva 1 of
City Engineer. Parking on this facility shall typically be allowed.
However, Pi!rking at critical locations may be denied as deemed appropriate
by the Ci tY Engi neer. I f a bike 1 ane is to be provi ded in conformance
with the Bicycle Element on this Class I facility and parking is to be
retained, an additional 10 feet of right-of-way will be required to allow
for a 10-foot widening of the roadway cross section.
In special cases if no abutting property access is allOlved, the strip's
median, with approval of City Engineer, can be reduced to 4 feet.
\lith approval of City Engineer, in developed areas, with less than 74 feet
curb to curb (64') no widening is required except at approaches to
intersections as per Exhibit uA". Approaches shall be designed as per
Exhibit uFo U Left turn into an intersection driveway will be prohibited
by a raised median. Further modifications r.1ay be allOlied to this standard
as a result of the existing and projected traffic volumes.
S'
It
.... Ss' / 94'
It
S'
LANDSCAPED ~
SUFFER AREA
EASEMENT 45'
10'
;0 34'/37'
.....34'/37'
10'
t~~~ ~
(2;1 MAX --- c-r
y~ PARKING ~ I s'
<1-
20/0 I 20/0
, I
12 12' 14~~1 12 12'
,
SLANDoCAPED
SUFFER AREA
5.5' 4.5' EASEMENT
........
~5"MAX~
2% /
I I 2:1 MAX
I =J: PARKING ~
, *THE MEDIAN
WIDTH MAY SE REDUCED
TO 4' WITH THE APPROVAL
OF THE CITY ENGINEER
,
5.5'
1.1ti1~.IlI.' IB.idl"'~
** Landscaped slopes greater than 5:1 may be acceptable as determined by the
uirector of Planning.
10/12/89
-7-
sd - 13
,.
1\
'Oil
It
It
LA
BU
EA
B' '"
IIZ'/1I6' B'
" ..
10/12' 39' 7' 7' 39' 10'/12'
MAX . ... r-- 2:1 M
1~1 f-- 55'/8' 5.5'/8' -
Z% 2% 2% 20/0 2% / --- I
1\2%
I - - I - I
AX I NO It. NO 4;-
NDSCAPED PARKING PARKING LANDSCAPE
FFER AREA 17' II' II' 14' II' /I' 17' BUFFER AR
SEMENT EASEMENT
AX
2:r
D'
EA
"116' RIGHT-OF- WAY DUE
<WI_
6-LANE MAJOR
(DEVELOPED AREA W/O I-B05)
** Landscaped slopes greater than 5:1 may be acceptable as determined by the
Director of Planning.
~. FOUR-LANE MAJOR
ZO'
DSCAPED
FER AREA
,EMENT
· '; ~X
:----\"
-"
Commerci a1 Area
(frequent driveways)
Low DenSity Area
Z:I MAX/
Design ADT
Mini~um design speed
Curb-tD-curb
Right-of-way
Maxi~um grade
Minimum curve radius
28,000
45 mph
80' (includes a
16' median)
30,000
55 mph
80' (includes a
16' median)
104'
7%
1,100' with no
supere1evation
104'
7%
1,150' with 5%
supere1evation
to 2,000 with
no
supere1evation
:he
Major streets are primarily designed to distribute localized trips.
Typically, intersections shall be spaced no closer than 660 feet unless'
otherwi se approved by the Ci ty Engi neer and si gna1 i zed i ntersecti ons shall
be spaced no closer than one-quarter mile interval s. A raised median is
"equired to separate the tliO directions of travel and to improve the
'isual appearance of the arterial corridor. One mid-block median opening
lay be permitted only with approval of the City Engineer. Such
ntersection and any resulting signals shall not negatively impact sign<11
rogression and traffic flow on major streets. This opening shall
Ipical1y be spaced at the mid-point '>etween the major intersections
'pprox. 660'). The specific location of these median openings shall be
temi ned by the Ci ty Engi neer.
39
-5-
5d -14
-
<<
\\ J"i
.~
'-- '
Access to and from four-lane major streets from abutting properties shall
typically be controlled but not restricted. No direct access from
single-family residential homes is allowed. In developed area of the City
direct access from single-family homes could be allowed with approval of
City Engineer. Full access median openings will be permitted with
approval of the City Engineer on these facilities only at locations
specified by the City Engineer and under conditions estab1 ished by the
city. Parking on these facilities shall typically be allowed. However,
parking at critical locations may be denied as deemed appropriate by the
Ci ty Engi neer. If a bi ke 1 ane is to be provi ded in conformance wi th the
Bicycle Element on this four-lane major facility and parking is to be
retained, an additional 10 feet of right-of-way will be required to allO\~
for a lO-foot widening of the roadway cross section. Four-lane majors
sha 11 also provi de 1 andscaped buffer areas. Pedestri an cross i ng demand
should be well planned, focused and controlled to direct pedestrians to
designated crossing points at signalized intersections.
Widen all approaches to intersections as per Exhibit "A" in order to
provide for additional lanes, as per Exhibit "E."
It
It
*
100'/104'
20'
20 1
~
... 10'/12'
10'/12 ' LANDSCAPED
LANDSCAPED a' a' 32' aUFFER AREA
aUFFER AREA 32' "- EASEMENT
EASEMENT .,. '" r- ....
"""5:1 MAX l i-..... 5.5'/ a' 5.5/8' - '5. I MAX
.----- ~ 2% 2%~ 20/0 2% ----
~ -
-ri~ ~
~2:1 MAX
PARKING
**
10/12/89
l
I ,
~
<J"
"
-
""
-
a'
12'
12'
12'
a'
12'
PARKING
2:1 MAX/
"104' RIGHT-OF-WAY DUE
i~:
4-LANE MAJOR
Landscaped slopes greater than 5:1 may be acceptable as determined by the
Direc:cr of Planning.
-6-
501 -l~
"PROp.
",I1/W
48'
WI'Tit 'ff"~ R ECLAIMEDI\i,M.
NE'fI s" REeL WM,
(l ~r <I
. 8" 8'
~O'
VA/RES IO/toOO1
5U8OiV/S/ON
E30LNOARY , '
EXI, ~~ IMp!:'O~~,!!
30' H'4 27'1. T
12" DaM, W.M.
,oP OF PiFE fL .4{,2,1
an REeL WM,
TOP OF PIPE El.~4(.().1
<;;;>~
",.; ^ 5
\::,
, ....." ", ~..' .:._.~. "~...,,. -""~~._.,,,
'EAST"I-f STREET TO STA:'2163,:68
---,-,,'.
VARIES FROM 4'RTe3TA J+~2./~
TO 8'LTe GTA4tS213
vJ
C.
G
~:::
\.J
\L1
V)
'SiJBOIVIB/ON
BOLNDARY
'.48'
""40'
ttlSI ::
; IMPnrJvtMENTS )';,
. '";'.(VARIES} ,,~;:/,.
<:....".-. .' 'L.I
,-. ....~-- -'
MOP.
I1tw.
:NrG WALLS
':$plil&PUiNS :'
'I 9/-G5GA'."", "."
'm" 'c'STA 2+ 63,68
PROP.
I1!.W
,,'
".
~ ~,~
\-=
\ \ i
""F,,=~.,t;~~it~ijt
w
~
\[J
~
',.< - .. ~--~"_~~'_'''''''':"":''''
(CALLE SANTIAGO TO ST A. 23,j-Q~.:9~;
:..,.'.'.... . . ..' , ',..:.,.....- .,' ~-_.. ',.. -.~~.:~~...-
EXlsr[fI10;t"C~oP'; ~
, , . I1lw\.,"'",
A
JtECT TO
%,'ff't.ANKlNi
f-wtf//i
7YP)\ ~~
o f~'
SiJ8DVlfJION H'H '.
I 80UND4RY , '~ ,"
I EXISTING .vfi. ./'\:'
L1MPIi'OVEMEN7S_ <, '
-----------:.!'?~:.- ~ ."
H . ~"
Hore, FOR lETTERED " 'f,',,,.
---- DIMeNSIONS} IIEFER .
, TO 'A6J.~ t17
STA. 23+69.94 TO STA 28+31.99
..J
~
~
r:
.vA iflt(JtJTrJ'sTA'f/15U4.J'LT
'n14/+5t44 r~ WI "Sfl~f"'_
P!lOP.. JaAll~ti;'fl::iit;u.J5" 'HOP.
"_ 12'l7 ',0
. R/W 250lflSrUGIiTPfRPlJ,IJS .
rECT TO
'FPL411NIN6
".fNOKAPE
AND 0. TY\ 8' fO' 7
(TYPJ.
.- @) 15.1'
;(,,:\,
. .' 2-~<~::::\'"
"i>STA4fit64."rosTA47,S4."- DIMFN;/~/fEFeIf. ...c/..'..... t6,"'~.
~.SlOPE TRNVSITIONS TO TA6J.E . ',,; "C', ': _. .:
,FROM2%ro/% .., ':01' . ,',
STA, 28+31.99.TO TELEGRAPHcG.ANYONHOAD
\
.DETAI
NO SCALE
; TYPICAL STRE
.~:
CD 6"MON
])ea:J~04"DEC
(IN'';''nif~ 0 PAVE~
0~~m
@ 6"TYP
,. ELE
o SEE 5
eRO 55
G) SEE 51
'. CROSS
" . .' .'" "
. '.
: . ", '_. 'I,DCATION ,.,;,.
. FROM' . TO
.
CALLE SANTIAGO 7+30.27 .
, 7+30.27 8+90.27
--. 8+90.27 . 23+69.94
23+69.94 . 25+92.99
25+92.99 " 28+31.99
, - 28+31.99 28+78.91
"::''28'+'28.91 ' :29+58.94
i 29+58. g4;~;". , '. 291'76.94
...
29+76.94 .' 30+83 .94
30+83.94 33+48.94
, "-,33+48.94 36+48.94
. .. 36+-48.94 41+51.45
41+51.45 '45+13.96
-- .. -, --
'.
.'
\I F 41
..tar i. exclu.ively u.e~. ~be compreben.ive lan~.cape plana
ahall addre..:
a.
..
,.,
.
..
c.
:/,
,,!(!!!)
Slope anhancement an~ l.n~.c.pe tre.tment for the slope in
Open Space Lot A, Pha.. 3, Unit 3, beneath the Junior High
School lot. ~e plan sball addre.. and provide for .ature
alIa plant .atarial, boulder work and/or buttra.. work on
th. alope.
A ftaturallz.d rev.g.tatlon program for area. of grading in
open apaca lota, which .ay includ. ~emporary irrigation.
~. disturbed -nativ.- ar.a. within ~.l.grapb Canyon Road
cpen ap.ce corridor. ~bis area sball includ. tr..
vroupln;s or tre. vrov... ~b.ae planting. sball be treated
as random planting. and shall be identifi.d in at l.ast .ix
area. along the corridor with .acb location providing
plantin;s of 50 ~o 100 tr.... ~b. .xact number of tr.e.
and locations are to be approv.d by the Planning.Department
and D.partm.nt of Parks and Recreation. Tbe intent of
th... grove ar.a. is to provide . con.i.tency with .xi.ting
grove ar.as in the open apace corridor we.t of the Rancbo
del Rey SPA III area.
Prior ~o approval of the V.... ~inal .ap, detai_l~J~owing the
location and design of the trail ay.t.m and . .i;n program ahall
be aubmitt.d to and approved by the Director. of Pl.nning .nd
.arka and R.cr.ation. The trail sy.tem in the open spac. lot.
aball be a .inimum , f..t wide within an . foot horizontal clear
apace and a 10 foot vertical clear apace. ~he a..ociated .ign
program ahall identify the trail network in the open spac. .reas
~ and connecting along ....0 Ranchero, ~o the'aati.faction of the
Directors of Planning and Park. .nd Recr.ation.
:11. Prior final aap approval for JIb... ",..~lt , .nd .h... 4,Vnit 2 '
a. shown on the Tentative Map, cro.. aaction. .hall be aubmitted
to and approv.d by the Director of Planning and City Engineer
illu.trating the interface wh.re the trail i. located adjacent
\ ,;' to the draina;e ditch along Telegraph Canyon Road. Tbe fencing
, :" (Of the drainage channal shall be aesthetically pleasing ,''0'
t~ incorpOrating the u.e of planting., aque.trian type fencin; and
j , vinyl clad f.ncing. Tbe.. cro.. section. and decorative fencing
proqraa aay be included with the comprehen.ive l.nd.cape plan.
rence vat.. ahall be provided at locations approv.d by the City
Zn;ineer ~ allow aaint.nanc. of the draina;. channel.
Park.
22. ~e dev.loper aball be obligated for 12.5 acre. of parkland a.
d..cribed in the approv.d SPA Plan, includin; land, and/or f.e.,
and/or additional tDprovement., in accordance with the Parkland
Dedication Ordinance. !h. .ctual final acrea;e will r.late to
th. n....~ of unite approv.d with the rinal up..'
'33. ~. park locat.d in .ba.. 3, Unit 4 .hall be . ainimum 10 n.t
us.abl. acr... De.i;n and dev.lopment of the park ahall be
{
Sd-/7
G -I
Gl
I
scJ -Jlo
.,....:::.
Ii, Hili
(
irrigation per the standards of the Parkland Dedication Ordinance, and installation of 3 lighted
ballfields with a soccer field. The community park, which has been named "Discovery Park," was
completed In April 1990. All of the grading, and neighborhood park level improvements will be
conditions of this project without reimbursement from the City. The construction of the parking
lot and the lighted ballfields/soccer field were required as part of this project and are valued at
approximately $518,000. These improvements will be a credit to the payment of Residential
Construction Tax fees in an amount equal to the actual cost of improvements. Credit will begin
immediately with Phase 2 and Phase 3 units. In addition to these improvements, the City may
construct a community center.
The East "H" Street Park and the neighborhood park located on the central ridge are the two parks
which will, by themselves, satiSfy the minimal dedication and improvement requirements for SPA
I of the City's Parkland Dedication Ordinance as In effect on October 1. 1987. The Parkland
Dedication Ordinance requires a minimum of 14.5 acres. Explorer neighborhood park is 5.6
acres. while the East "H" Street Park. devoted to park purposes and not encumbered by the SDG&E
easement, is 6 to 9 acres depending on other public facility needs. These parks have been master
planned by the developer and will be improved per the master plans. Maintenance of the East "H"
Street Park will be from the General Fund.
Marisol neighborhood park located in SPA II is 5.0 gross acres. This park was master planned by
the developer and improvements will be made in accordance with the approved Master Plan
consistent with the requirements of the Parkland Dedication Ordinance adopted by the City Council
in December 1987.
The neighborhood park in SPA III is 10.0 net useable acres and is located adjacent to the junior
high school site. This park will be master planned by the developer in conjunction with the
master plan for the junior high school site and improvements will made in accordance with the
Master Plan consistent with the requirements of the Parkland Dedication Ordinance adopted by the
City Council in December 1987. Should additional parkland be identified as needed to meet the
obligations of the Parkland Dedication Ordinance, the developer would make additional
improvements to parks within Rancho del Rey or that serve Rancho del Rey or pay cash equivalent
or some combination of improvements and cash payments at the rate of $173,455 per acre for
each additional acre so determined (i.e.. if 2.56 additional acres are determined. the developer
would be obligated for a total of $444,045 in additional improvements). The amount of additional
improvements will be based on the final number of dwelling units actually constructed within SPA
III.
The staging area, the SOO & E trails. and the canyon trails are three elements that are unique to
this project. The staging area developed with Phase 3 will serve to be the main entry to the Rice
Canyon Open Space Preserve. A Master Plan has been prepared and improvements were installed
t~~a~::~s ~n:~~l,:sl.:.~~ging la~: :;~th r:e:,~~ns an~ e:e~~nsiin-.~~ ~lW~, ·
The trail system will be Improved per the Master Plan prepared by the developer and approved by
theCity._.',1 mi:_.UIFr".U JI.__._LllIl ..-~.._..- rllldnH'\l
.t.JJj~_ClrlIIIW'.II-nIfJl I Ail_Ill IIlIl.' ·
Llbrarv
In April of 1987. the City approved a Public Library Master Plan which identified the need for
subregional library facilities to serve the needs of Mure residents. Rancho del Rey was included
in a subarea labeled the Sweetwater/Bonlta Study Area (Exhibit #5, page 28). The study
identified the need for a library facility of approximately 40.000 square feet to serve that area.
In light of the City's overall library needs. the minimum library desired by the City is 20.000
10/19/90
27
-
sJ-S-)
\~ ~.---. 'I
o
VILLA PALMERA
1!1.s.~ldHY.RI
Welcome to Villa Palmera, a new exciting and unique community in Chula
Vista.
We feel before you purchase your new home you should be aware of some of
the facts that make Villa Palmera unique.
History
In 1982, the property was approved for multi family use by the City of
Chula Vista which allowed 102 apartment style condominiums to be built.
Subsequently, Mission Village Properties, Ltd., of which Terra Industries,
Inc. is General Partner, purchased the property in 1987. Approval was
received through the City of Chula Vista Design Review Process for a new
concept and product featuring 76 patio homes of larger size with exclusive
use of yards and two car garages. Many of the homes are detached.
OwnershiD and Maintenance
Villa Palmer a has furthered its uniqueness while
condominium ownership with some twists that make each
single family home.
maintaining
home live
the
like a
In typical condominiums your association controls and maintains the
exterior of all dwellings. However, at Villa Palmera, each homeowner
maintains the outside of his home including painting, roofs, stucco as well
as the exclusive use area (yard) designated by (and including) the fence.
Also, each homeowner is responsible for his or her own water, telephone,
electricity and sewage charges.
The Villa Palmera Homeowner' s Association is responsible for maintaining
all landscape common areas around the homes (excepting the yards), the
private streets and motor courts; the pool, spa and cabana building and the
facilities for the recreation area; the sidewalks and drainage systems
outside the fenced yards, private street lighting, private street signs,
directories and offsite and onsite slopes.
Future DeveloDment
We have chosen not to include any "view premiums" in prIClng the homes,
even though some homes currently may have a view, since they could
conceivably have their views altered by the construction of single family
detached homes adjacent to Villa Palmera in the next 2 to 5 years. The
property adjacent to Villa Palmera is currently owned by the Rancho del Rey
Partnership which, according to the specific plan approved by the City of
Chula Vista in 1985, plans to develop approximately 1,380 homes south of
"H" Street.
- P~.D"P 1 of ? -
~J-:t.7
I\T'1
-----
The current status of Paseo Ranchero as proposed by the City of Chula Vista
is a four lane connector road joining "H" Street to the North and Telegraph
Canyon Road to the South with construction to be phased as Rancho del Rey
Partnership develops their property.
Homes on the East bordering Paseo Ranchero could experience an increase in
noise level when Paseo Ranchero eventually carries the City's projected
traffic loads. Those homes immediately adjacent to Paseo Ranchero have
some additional steps taken for sound attenuation, such as some dual glazed
windows and thicker glass as required by the Acoustical Impacts
International Report dated October 25, 1988.
The property bordering East "J" Street to the south is currently owned by
the Chula Vista City School District.
Further information regarding the proposed elementary school site can be
obtained from the Planning Division of the School District 425-9600.
Community FaciIit.v Districts and Charll'es
In order to make sure tax dollars and assessments paid by Villa Palmera
residents are applied to their specific needs, Community Facilities
District No.5, (C.F.D.) has been established according to the Mello-Roos
Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, for the purpose of
constructing public schools to provide adequate educational system
capacity. Additional information is provided under separate amendment to
the "Purchase Agreement and Escrow Instructions" which explains in detail
the costs associated with this C.F.D.
In the development of the Villa Palmera
has paid $591,710.00 in benefit fees
community which has not been added to
Project, Mission Village Properties
and public improvements to the
any Community Facilities District.
Villa Palmera is also unique in another way in that it has its own lII11irlllf.
.. V"\l'lI.itltt'en; This is only a temporary pump station that will be
maintained by the City of Chula Vista through charges on the resident's
water bill. Eventual1~' the pumps will be removed by the City of Chula
Vista once the Rice Canyon Trunk Sewer System is completed possibly by
Rancho del Rey and the area currently devoted to the pump station
(exclusive of the equipment) will be turned over to the Homeowner's
Association.
'SJ -.2- gr
)
~
eVDS STREET CHARACTERISTICS ~ MIN. RADII
l-
STD. DESIGN DESIGN TRAl EL ES PARXING IJ\.NES l'oED IAN CD. ~ TO-CD. R.O.II. roUGH MODERATE !I1.X .
DIIG. A.D.T. SPEED NO. WIDTH lEA NO. WIDTHIr:AI NIDTII WIDTH WIDTH TERRAINla) TERlIAIN la) GRADE
PRIME ARTEII1AL ~ 50,000 70 6 12'-16' 0 (1I) 16' 98' eVDs4 1000' 1500' n
MAJOR . 1 25,000 50 C 11' 2 8' 16' 80' eVDS 1 750' 1000' 7\
.COLLECTOR 1 10,000 CO C 12' 2 8' 0 64' eVDSl 300' SOD' 10\
RESIDEllTIAL (b)
COLU;CTOR 1 5,000 30 2 11' 2 8' 0 CO' eVDSl 200' 300' 12\
RES IDENTIAL 1 1,(00 Z5 2 10' 2 8' 0 36' eVDS 1 100' 200' IS\
COII~.zRCIAL/
IllDUSTRIAL 2 - 30 2 14' 1.2 11' 0 52' eVDS2 - 200' n
FRONTIIGE ROAD 2 - 25 2 11' 1 8' 0 3D' eVDs2 - laO' 15\
2-tIAY HILLSIDE Ie)
LOCAL 3 - 25 2 12' 1 8' 0 32' eVDs3 100' - 20\
I-MA'1 H n.LS IOE (e)
LOCAL 3 - 25 1 16' 1 8' 0 2(' eVDS3 lOa' - ' 20'
,-
RESIDENTIAL
CUL-DI::-S1.C - 25 2 10' 2 I' 0 36' 100' 200' 15\
ALLEY - 15 2 10' 0 0 0 II/A - - 15\
CITY or CIIULA VISTA 1l'OIE1l'!' STAllDAJIDS
I' -","'"
f-Ls,t.l\~~.
I
'"
'"
I
/'0
~
. .
(a)
(b)
Ie)
!,~)
",,,,,
'" ....
~'"
" 1.
"
c; (t)
())>-'
..,.
2.
3.
TOPOGRAPHIC CLASSIFICATIOII TO BE DETERMINED BY CI~Y ENGINEER.
8\ IN COMIIERCIAL AIUIAS.
CRADE SEGMENTS IN EXCESS OF 12\ SHALL NOT EXCEED 300 FEET IN LENGTH.
1000 roOT LENGTH SEGMENT SHALL NOT EXCEED 10\.
!::ME!lGEIICY PARKING TO BE ALLOIJED IN OU'!'ER 16' TRAVEL 7,'~ES.
~~,:~,_ NO'!E!
SUSTAIIlED GRADES AND AVERAGE GRADE OVER AllY
,
,-
CITY'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR CONSTRUCTION SHALL BE GENERALLY LUIITEIl TO MED1AII CONSnUCTION FOR ARTERIALS AND MAJORS
TO INCLUDE CURB, GUTTER, L/lNOSCAPING, IRRIGATION AND STREET LIGHTS WITHIN MEDIAN, AND FOR ONE 12' TRAVEL LANE ON
EACH SlOE OF ARTERIAL MEDIANS.
PO!\TIJ\.NO CEMEnT CONCRETE PAVEIIENT SHALL BE RFOUlRE~ "0<: GRADES IN EXCESS OF 12\.
;/\
.
TilE CITY EtlGINEER HJ\Y APFROVE REOUGION OF PARKING, SWEWALKS AlID RIGHT OF WAY FOR STREETS WlIERE DEE.'l.EO
API'RC'PRIATE, HOWEVER, TilE HINIMUM PAVEllENT WIOIII EXCLUOIMG CURB ANO GUTTER SHALL BE 24'. IF SIDEWALl( IS DELETED,
_"d......_ ~...r"IU .,.,,,,.. ~"'~T nTl' r.tlP:B TO PROPE1;l"''' LINE SllALL BE Sf.
._.t__
\\ K
I(
TREE PLANTING a MAINTENANCE
EASEMENT 1
100'
3i
e'
e'
32'
5.5'
5,5
4,5'
'.'
.J:'!Lo ~
I 20/0
~
I Ii' MONOLITHIC CURe
GUTTER a SIDEWALK
MAJOR STREET
20/0
".'
2%
2:1 FILL
(T 'fP) vi'
I":fi.;.J:
, It .i
84'
R. rTREE PLANTING e
MAINTENANCE
EASEMENT
5.5' 5.5'
4!J'
5.5'
32'
3~
(9 P 11L-......d.
20
II 2% (TYP)
COLLECTOR STREET It
60'
Ii'MONOLITHIC CURB
GUTTER a SIDEWALK
It
.--- TREE PLANTING a
" MAINTENANCE
5.5 EASEMENT
5.5'
45
20'
20'
5.5'
4.5'
51RAIIMT
'''ADE lTYPl
LEVEL
t%
6" MONOLITHIC CURB,
a SIDEWALK
STREET
It
II
CbLLECTOR
GUTTEF
RESIDENTIAL
It
56"
.r- TREE PLANTING a
, MAIN TENANCE
5.5' 5.5 EASEMENT
4.5
2:1 CUT
(TYP)
5.5' 5.5' Ie'
45
Ie'
Sl::1t~\T"I'"
~
20/0
LIVIL_
...-.-
6" MONOLITHIC CURB,
GUTTER a SIDEWALK
i
RESIDENTIAL
NOTES:
STREET
I. SIDE....AL.K WIDTH WILL IE INCIUASED TO . IfEET IF CITY ENGINEER DETE....INES
THAT IT 1$ ,U.IUtANTEO IY PEDlstRIAN TIU.""IC.
2. w'NIMUM CURl RADII:
A. I"TlltIICTIO" 0' ALL." WITH 4N" ITIIIIET', 10 'EIT
.. 1II1.IDENTIAL STRIIT TO IlIIIDIMTI.-L aTItIIT: aD 'lIT.
C. ALL OTHIIt INTER..eTrON': aD 'liT
I. ., elKE LANES .RE ItEQUIRID ADD 10' TO THE WIDTH 0'
STREET AND 'RoptflT" LINES.
NOT TO SCALE
. 1I..I..d D,.... R. M. F. 0.1. 2-24-B3 CITY OF CHULA VISTA
3,83 "",.n. 0.1. '$ -1- 8 .) PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTM NT
(/~ ~ p7 ' ~ TYPICAL STREET CVDS
SECTIONS I
CITY ENGINEER
~ -3_0
(. 4'BROKEN DOUBLE
YELLOW
G'DASHED
. WHITE
R/W
8'
IZ'
IZ'
2
-,
~
Q:..:
\
W G~~~~D
_~XIS T. CURB PER
v, DWG. NO. 8B-Z45
~CV~f)t '
~.\
Z40' CURB TRANSITION: NORTHBOUND SHIFT 4'
Z40' LANE TRANSITION: NORTHBOUND SHIFT Z'
Z40' i TRANSITION: SHIFT 5'
G'SOLlD
WHITE
CURB
15 ASEO
3
IZ'
· G' DASHED
WHITE
157.%' CURB TRANSITION
\.
4' DOUBLE SOLID
YELLOW
4
IZ'
IZ'
8'
SUBDIVISION
BOUNDARY
Z40' LANE TRANSITION: SOUTHBOUND SHIFT G'
CENTERUNE DATA
~RG, RPlJIUS LENGTH REMARKS
1995.00' GOO.OO'
. 1995.00' G5,8Z'
77.17'
Z40.00'
195.95'
G71.07'
A<' t:JI/IIT
R/W
GO' TURNOUT
TRANSITION
10'
<D
.,.
4'
IZ'
~ 12'
8'
10'
SCALE.
~
80'
Z' TRANSITION
EAST CURB & R/W
CURB
10'
it>
0'>
_ in
.,. '"
5
S'SOLlD
WHITE
9G' - G' DASHED
WHITE
140' LEFT TURN POCKET
\ EXIST CURB PER CITY
OF C.V, DWG NO, 88-Z45
in
.,.
40'
I
I
I
~
J
R97BL
~ 10'
8'
IZ'
IZ' 4'
30+00
Z'
12'
STOP
PAVEMENT
LEGEND
-
--
r-
~
iii
I::i
, i
,
.
~
. ~
>
"
~
.
.
.
i ;6~%-~'811111~~i~i~lij~I~I"
ill 0 '7 'tJ -::4 r\i~ III:' ~~I~ ,:,j ~ >
:ti. dO;!:''' I (;;I'<:l <:>11 '
S? ~ < ~ ~ I;]f;i 111:~~il~ ..
Ol l\2 ["ll ~ ~ ~~ 11:~~.:t;::tj ,:
~ rn::O ~ ~~~ I, 1~<1~L,;(J111 '.
'I (j1. \:] :< :<~ ~~I~ '.
27.80 );ioCATED / I ~ ~ I Jr'/ I '
2501h' IIPSV Sll/6flT ~:, .,' '
W/4>3'12 Po. II:: :1 ~I. I
'II~ ~ I i AQ'
j: '0 "'"
I :
ElJ6E OF H/.tT I'JW/T.
SAWCI/T L!.I/E 2' I?r~ 1I.1l./lBfJ1
flENOVIIL *
EllS T ST LlGIIT< p.8.
TO Bt RnOC'ATf'D
TO eTA. 27+80 I
;., ",., ",.",,~ I
~::. ~~ ~ "'<3;
"il! ;J;~ ~ i:ll'" I,
;;;!':' '" ~ 0\' II
"'" (;l'l'\ ~ "''''
~ ""~ (J; ~ 1;; II
' j;btfl '" ~,..
::! t!j<::; II> _
'" 'I! % "',
'1::" )'Ii t:b:t>.
~ ~ ~ . '" I
~ ~ ~
~ ~~ ~
'" '-
'.\)
~~
\)~
~"
~~
:>i<!
~ii\
~~
,,~
~SJ
~l
29+08 250W HP V Sl UOHTON irZrP,4-7tJ TMrFlC
SIGNAL 6'TANDARD W/#3'12PB.
" 29_35 2"RECL. WAT/;R IRR SERVICE
I 2"tt4~8.C. 6.<2....
I ,~:;'29f58.9"- 50' LT Z'+5'.07
." 'bEND R WJRANBIT/fW /~":j/T
if- 2.9"'Jfj_94~ 50' LT RCR. FH.
:/ BEGIN A.C. 8ERM ~ TEMP.
.C. SIDEWALK 29,8""'6P.B.
.. '-..... LlN€':4"see SH7.8 /'i:)(( {'ROFILE
, -'- \ :J(:Jt-OI.(;f} >;-TYI'E ",4-5"C.O.
. 3OT2B.~ S7U.5 1.e._451G.'ZO
(J"PfI(!. SEII'6f(TEMr./'UKSeND
I 30+3394 8"p.Ilc.l?ecL.W47e't'i;
:.DETAIL 2 S7U1J f( TEMP CAI"
I~ IZ"f.V.C, DO!I/.WUNe SlV8 AND
~O+-7.3*GP.8 r/f,ffp C4P ".
3O,6'!.5'f.~of8'apc.R. MfDf'NOA.C.8ERM ,:-.,
, TEMPafARY A.C.SIDCWALK AND BEGIN \Ill>
LOIJG€POLE FENCE ~~
30+-8'1 BEGIN GVARtwAIL ~
~~~
~~tJ
0>.""
-.~~
~ <..:1>.~
c.:9>~
, ''''''~S:J
~:bYlYl....... ;ij
. :::t::::C..r!:i[!'j~~~;t;.
: ~",~n;~~:;::
. NO<"" ~!::l ai 31/84 END
. ;l( "Ii 61/A.RllRAfL
u,<S I::>
...~~
~ ,~
'"'
'(61'157 CCNoud'-
'57 so.G., e. s.P.
-.L!IZI?'10'53"E
':-WST8fCeCl"'cutW
/1'
*5 lJ
3O'8~.93~38'RT I'C.R.
25011' 111'.81' $[ LlQIfTON;-X-4<
TRAFFIC S'liNAL STANPAii"'l~j'"
11'/#3'12 P.B. "i!l ~ C>
... .,.
.3/T05 . [", \;j ,
SOG.ffE.S.P. ~1:j ,.~
(z40'V) t( 3fef?~ ~ '" ..
"'I"'. '"
(j) ~II~ ~ .
Hlnn~ .
fl) ...,_ ...,-[, '1'
~ ....L- ~~~~ :r,l . c:~
:s 0 CIl5"11.!! I'. l;\!: I ~ >:
~ 0 l-~ :I''''~~' &i I
~ l- J> '" . ~ Q
j;! V I' . N~ ~
r:: ~ < ~2'OO i\; .\>> 0
~ (j) 7{"3' RB , "" <:
'i I \.J) :I)
\l)'---lc....{ ~~ OJ
""1 '1 ,; In' 0
::::''y~~' ~i'll ~
n ::;~,. o>~ '"
I ~ o. It'
'---l " "':li:~ ""
~ ~1~.s:;> ::tJ
~':::. II s,~NJi --< I - "
I
~~o
I~OC
~c::O
(
m
- .
-~
ITl ~~ CD
>.J !f~
- --- s;:, ill",>
Z';, 10 ~ 27'
I ,
~'i
I,"
\ "'-SOib'OW/Z#((;TkW/f'
. . f# G-M!\E CC/
271-30 i MH. #8
"-
C:>
'i
c::'"
,,=:"=
-'"
-Ill>
'"
""",
'"
Z8fJ1.78 t T,(PE 'ij-4' C.O.
. e8f91.1J9 ~ 48' LT
cNP ~W TRANS/TIM
28+-3 .gg ~ ~ {'T.
26-/32./3 CUI<.13 4f'T.
zaf7. . / ~ 48'L?:
BEG/ N R/W Tf'A/lSITftJN
26'-t 7:1.03 CURB 4: f'r
ZQSCI-I.8tJN #47J1W,:
1# IP .541'(e CL/
"
C:>
'i
C:"
<';::::I::
-h-
-Ilr>
+'"
L>>
i\)
3ft%! END SloeW.4LK
T,<:ANS. fJEGIN MONOll7l(((!
W,f.5 GUTTEI'( t;'sw.
S-d-3'2--
. n-
.~
- -
r;;
::0
::l
o
>-
r
]
~
.
II
O?
::::0
)>
Z
()
I
IT]
;;0
o
N I
(Xl
~
,--
-
tN
l\J
z
-0
~o
"pl
~~cn
IJ 0 -10
(J(:JJ
r.. _'71
\\..AJ II
Ybe developer ahall be responsible ~or construction of full
atreet improvement. for .11 pUblic and private .treets shown on
the ~.ntative Map within the .ubdivision boundary; and for the
con.truction of off-.ite improvement. to construct Paseo
aanebero, East -J" 8tr..t and P.seo Ladera as .hown on the
~tative Map, to the aatisfaction of the City Eniineer. '.
aaid iaprov..ent. ahall inc1ud., but not be limit.d to, asphalt'
concrete pavem.nt, be.., concrete curb, vutt.r aneS .ieS.....alk,
a.w.r and vater uti1itie., drainaie faci1iti.s, .tr.et lights,
aigna', ~1re bydrant. .nd transitions to exi.tini improvements.
street inter..ction apacini as .hown on the tentative map is
laereby approv.d.
All the atr..t. abewn on the ~ent.tive M.p within the
aubdivi.ion bound.ry, exc.pt priv.t. .tr.ets, .h.ll be dedic.ted
~or public us.. c..iin of .aid .tr.et. .hall ...t all City
atandard..
19. A t..porary turn.round conforming to City stand.rds shall be
provided at the .nd of street. h.ving a length ;r..ter than 150
f..t, ....ur.d from the center line of the nearest intersecting
atreet to. the center of the cul-d.-sac, exc.pt a. approve a by
the city Eniin.er.
"
. ~~7.
\ .
\
j
. .
.
',\;C\ 11.
20. CUl-d.-sac. and knuckl.. shall be d.sign.d and built in
accord.nc. with City at.nd.reSs unl.ss otherwi.e approveeS by the
City Eniin.er.
r
10.
~~ eonfl~rB~ion
\ ,
/21.
.' 22.:,
\ -
>f;a.,
n_1
.
Frontai. on all lots shall be a minimum of3S f.et at the riqht-
ef-way line except a. .pproved by the City Engineer. This
condition do.. not apply to flag lot., a. defined in the
Municipal Code.
Lot 11n.. shall be loc.t.d at the top of .lope. except as
approv.d by the City Engineer. ~~~ a~jacent to open .pace
lot., property line. .hall be loc.t.a . minimum 2.5 feet from
th~ _~~_. ~..Lslope.
~. pr.par.tion of fin.l .aps and plan. for the locations'listeeS
below shall be carri.d out in accoreSanc. with the
followini crit.ri. unl... oth.rwi....pprov.d by the city
En;ineer and Dir.ctor of Planning: .'
!'.',~~~i~ee:fE.=t~~rn~r~
II ~ .
b.
Provid. a peda.tri.n throuihway betw.en lot. 130 and 131,
Pha..', Vnit i,'from camino Calabazo to e.st -J" street
acro.. from tha achool and park sit...
sol-$3
~
\\
o
'11
Pursuant to Section 66412.2 of the Subdivision Map
Act, the Council certi fies that it has considered
the effect of this approval on the housing needs of
the region and has balanced those needs against the
public service needs of the residents of the City
and the available fiscal and environmental resources.
5. The size and configuration of the site and resulting
street pattern do not allow for the optimum siting
of lots for passive or natural heating and cooling
opportunities without reducing the density well
below that allowed under the existing zoning.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of said
subdivision is subject to the following conditions:
(
1. A 6 ft. minimum level width of landscaping backed by
a decorative wall shall be provided between back of
sidewalk and property line for all lots which
back-on or side-on to . E' Street and Boni ta Road
with the exception of the wider up-slopes involving
a total dimension of 10 ft. or wider from back of
sidewalk on lots 14 and 15, in which case the wall
will be located at top of slope. The top of slope
on Lot 14 shall be drawn back from the intersection
an additional 15 ft. providing a gentler 4: 1 slope
transi tion. These areas as well as the eucalyptus
grove shall be shown as a' separa te lettered lot (s)
to be incorporated into an open space maintenance
district which shall be formed at the request of the
applicant.
2. "'-"....'\:t:l:. lti1Jf"".olfil '~I',wal1 "1ttt.',"H..~.r.,;,,t:i5 I
ft'~};,\,..tlilIIiHf_e..t.c)>"'ll' ,". ..t.lt~ ..,itrb111'
,.""''''''''' .,.c:e_iftt,~.,,4j,.t.1' i,c.c.. al.p,' B."
MWe't:, Boni ta Road, and to the setback lines of
Lots I (exterior) and 19 (front). A 6 ft. high wood
fence with masonry pilasters at 25 ft. on center
shall be constructed along the wester ly boundary.
The CC&R'S shall contain a prohibition against any
modifications, additions or supplements to the
perimeter wall/fence.
3. A landscape and irrigation plan shall be submitted
for review and approval of the City Landscape
Architect in accordance with the Chula Vista
Landscape Manual to include the open space
maintenance district lot(s) and the wall/fencing
program and details.
-3-
-- --- ---- - - --
...
s-d-d'1
(
E--
..-.
II
0\\
4.
Written evidence shall be submitted to the city that
agreements have been reached with both school
districts regarding the provision of adequate school
facilities to serve the project prior to approval of
the final map.
. ,
5.
The approval of a final map by the
require compliance with the city's
standards to the satisfaction of
Planning.
city council will
adopted threshold
the Director of
6. The amount of any fees applicable to the project,
including but not limited to PAD, DIF and RCT fees,
shall be those in effect at the time they are
collected.
7. The applicant shall retain an acoustician certified
with the city of Chula Vista to take noise readings
following the construction of t,beftols. 1)I~Td.r wall ,
but prior to the issuance of building permi ts for
the dwellings. Based on these readings, the
applicant will be required to use any additional
construction techniques that may be necessary to
i-~~tbe not.. .11111e1 _., ~~ _ _ U. 6I:~. Prior to
occupancy ,_1.ft14t~:at1'l9S will elfdn b-e
r~""d..to ...are _-tbetintetior noi.. leye18 are
r...o~t6 4~ a.~~ or lower.
8. The developer shall be responsible for the
construction of full street improvements for all
streets within the subdivision and for all street
improvements for streets adjacent to the subdivision
as shown on the Tentative Map or as modified by the
city Engineer.
9. public improvements as described in this resolution
shall include, but not be 1 imi ted to: AC pavement
and base, concrete curb, gutter, sidewalk, street
lights, signs, street trees, fire hydrants, sanitary
sewer, water and drainage facilities. All
improvements shall be designed and constructed in
accordance with city standards.
.
10. The developer shall grant to the City street tree
planting and maintenance easements along all public
streets within the subdivision as required by the
city Engineer.
11. The developer shall request the vacation of that
portion of HilltoP Drive located within the project,
along the westerly property line of subject
project. said vacation shall be approved by the
city council prior to approval of the Final Map.
--
-4-
s-~- 3S
-~- _., ----.- ---- --'~:...
..
. .5.
II P II
1"z'lor ~ approval of .-.ch-'rlnal-.ap, the developer .hall enter
into an .;r....nt with the City wh.rein h. holds the City
harala.. for any liability for ero.ion, ailtation or increased
~lov of dralnaqe re.ultlnq from tbl. project.
.6. ft. d.v.loper ahall .nter into an .9'1'e_ent wi tb the Cl ty
whereby the d.v.loper .;r..s to participat. in the monitor in; of
exi.ting and future .ewage'flow. in the ~eleqraph canyon ~nk
..wer and the ~lnanclnq of the preparation of the Ba.in Plan
and, ~auant to any adopted Basin Plan, a9'1'ee to partiCipate in
~a financing of improvement. a.t forth th.rein, 1n an equitable
~er. Said a9'1'eement .hall be executed by the developer prior
~o final ..p approval for any pha.e or unit propoainq to -
".M.rge .ew.ge J.nto -1:I1e '!'el.;raph onyon -2'runk "'wer.
, ,
,\
-, '
\
\
(
i
. .7. fta developer .hall permit .11 franchiaed cable televiaion
cospanie. (.Cable Company.) aqual opportunity to place conduit
to and provide cable television .ervice for each lot within the
aUbdiviaion. ~e developer .hall anter into an a9'1'eement with
all participating Cable companies which .hall provide, in part,
that upon receiving written notice from the citi that .aid Cable
Company la in violation of the term. and condit on. of the
franchiae ;ranted to .aid Cable Company, or any other term. and
condition. requlating aaid Cable Company in the City of Chula
Viata, a. aame may from time to time-be amended, developer ahall
auspend cable Company'a acce.. to .aid conduit until City
otherwiae notifies developer. Said agreement ahall be approved
by the city Attorney prior to final~ap approval.
68. ~e developer .hall utilize the pa.eo Ranchero corridor for,
construction traffic unle.. otherwi.e approyad'by the city
~ Enqineer. A con.truction traffic plan .hall be,.ubmitted ~or
review .nd .pproval prior'to-.;prov..l,...Rf ~..' ~ir..t,..tin.l ~ap~
Jaauance of a grading permit, whichever occur. fir.t. ~he plan
aball include provi.ion. for du.t control and atate hour. of
operation. Revisions to aaid plan ahall be approv.d by the City
Engineer.
~.../PaV'lllen~.
, It. ft. aubj.ct property ill within the boundaries of Op.n Spac.
Diatrict 120 (Zone 7), Op.n Spac. Di.trict 110 (Pha.. II) and
&a......nt Di.trict 187-1. Prior to final map approval or other
;rant of approval for any pha.e or unit th.r.of, the d.velop.r
ahall pay all co.t. a..ociated with:
.) d.tachm.nt of .ubj.ct prop.rty from Open Spac. District 110
(Ph... %1)' and
b)
r.apportionm.nt of .....sm.nta for Op.n Spac. Di.trict 120
(Zon.7) and Aa....m.nt Di.trict 187-1 a.,a r.sult of
.ubdivi.ion of land. within the project boundary.
.
'70. '1'be develop.r .hall pay:
~d -3'