HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991/06/18 Agenda Packet
. It; (r ,....,.I._,..~...
i. " -'" .
CY'\
,
~- /,
" ..."
!~:n
. ';-,
..:" ; ~j
:\.""!
Tuesday, June 18, 1991
6:00 p.m.
,.Y_4I'1I._
.'~~:,E~.;(;' : ,:,::~~~"
Council Chambers
Public Services Building
Regular MeetinS1 of the City of Chula Vista City Council
CALLED TO ORDER
1.
CALL TIlE ROIl.:
Councilmembers Malcolm _, Nader ~ Rindone ~ and Mayor Pro
Tempore Moore _'
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO TIlE FLAG. SILENr PRAYER
3. APPROVAL OF MINIITES: None submitted.
4. SPEC1AI. ORDERS OF TIlE DAY:
a. Oath of Office: Linda Wilson - Library Board of Trustees
b. RESOLUTION 16201 RECITING TIlE FACT OF TIlE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION
HElD ON JUNE 4, 1991, DECLARING TIlE RESULT AND sum
OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY LAW (City Clerk)
c. Comments by Mayor Pro Tempore Moore
d. Presentation, Report and Recognition of Delegation at the 10th Aoniversary Celebration in
Odawara, Japan
e. Oath of Office for New Mayor
f. Comments by Mayor Nader
* * * CI1Y COUNCIL WILL RECESS FOR A RECErrION . . .
(Conference Room 1)
5. ROIl. CALL: Councilmembers Malcolm _, Moore ~ Rindone _, and Mayor Nader_.
6. Declaration of Vacancy in Council Seat No.3. Staff recommends that Council take a minute action
to declare Council Seat No.3 vacant by Councilman Nader's election to the Office of Mayor.
AGENDA
-2-
JUNE 18, 1991
CONSENT CALENDAR
The staff reco11llTlDUlatimls regarding the following items listed under the Consent Calendar will be enacted by the
Coundl by one motion without discussion unless a Councilmember, a member of the publiJ; or City staff requests
that the item be puIkd for discussion. If you wish to speak 011 one of these items, please fill out a "Request to
Speak Form" available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. (Complete the green form
to speak in favor of the staff recommendation; complete the pink form to speak in opposition to the staff
recommendaJion.) Items puIkd from the Consent Calendor will be discussed after PubliJ; Hemings and Oral
ComnwniJ;ations. Items pulled by the publiJ; will be the first items of business.
7. WRITfEN COMMUNICATIONS:
a. Letter from Chair of Chula Vista 21 Committee regarding the resignation of Lee Chapman
and appointment of a replacement member.
b. Claims Against the City: Claimant No.1: Erreca's Inc., c/o Shifflet, Walters, Kane &
Konoske, Attorneys at Law, 1370 West India, San Diego, CA 92101, Claimant No.2: Biggs
Engineering Corporation, c/o Law Offices of William I. Chopak, 3111 Camino Del Rio North,
Suite 1100, San Diego, CA 92108, Claimant No.3: Bayscene Resident Negotiators, Law
Offices of Stanley P. Zubel, 7290 Navajo Road, Suite 203, San Diego, CA 92119
8. ORDINANCE 2462 REZONING CERTAIN TERRITORY WTIHlN TIlE CENTRAL CHULA VISTA
COMMUNl1Y, GENERAIJ.YBOUNDED BYE STREET, H STREET, SECOND
AVENUE, AND THIRD AVENUE, PLUS AN ADDITIONAL AREA EAST OF
FOURTH AVENUE BETWEEN "E" AND DAVIDSON STREETS, TO
GENERAIJ.Y REDUCE TIlE EXISTING PERMITI1ill DENSmES FROM R-3
TO LESSER DENSmES, AS DEPICfED ON EXHIBITS A, B, C, AND D
ATTACHED HERETO (second readinlt and adoDtion) (Director of Planning)
9. ORDINANCE 2463 ADDING CHAPTERS 3.21 AND 14.16 TO TIlE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL
CODE TO ESTABUSH A STORM DRAIN FEE AND FUND(second readinlt
and adoDtion) (Director of Public Works)
10. ORDINANCE 2464 AMENDING SECTION 9.20.020, 9.20.040, 9.20.045, 9.20.050AND ADDING
SECTION 9.20.035 TO CHAPTER 9.20, PROPER1YDEFACEMENT, OF TIlE
CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE (first readinlt) - The proposed ordinance
will add a section permitting graffiti to remain and amend sections to
include the regulation of displaying aerosol paint containers and felt tip
markers, enforcement of wrongful storage offenses, parental civil
responsibility for damages, and civil responsibility for damages wrongful
display or storage. Staff recommends Council place ordinance on first
reading. (Director of Public Works)
11.A. RESOLUTION 16189 APPROVING TIlE FINAL MAP AND SUBDMSION IMPROVEMENT
AGREEMENT AND AUTHORIZING TIlE MAYOR TO EXEClITE SAID
AGREEMENT FOR CHULA VISTA TRACT 88-3, EASTLAKE GREENS PHASE
1D, UNITS 25 AND 40. On July 25, 1989, Council approved the Tentative
Subdivision Map for Chula Vista Tract 88-3, Eastlake Greens. The Pinal
AGENDA
-3-
JUNE 18, 1991
Map and associated agreements for Phase 1D, Units 25 and 40 are now
before Council for approval. Staff recommends approval of the resolution.
(Director of Public Works)
B. RESOLUTION 16190 APPROVING SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT WIlli TIlE DEVELOPER OF
EASTI.AKE GREENS PHASE 10, UNITS 25 AND 40 NEEDED TO SATISFY
TENTATIVE MAP CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL NO. 30, 3l(b), 31(C) AND
80
12. RESOLUTION 16193 APPROVING FIRST AMENDMENT TO TIlE AGREEMENT WlTIl WILLDAN
ASSOCIATES FOR ASSESSMENT ENGINEERING SERVICES RENDERED
FOR TIlE OTAY VALLEY ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 90-2, AND
AUTIlORIZING TIlE MAYOR TO SIGN SAID AGREEMENT - On May 22,
1990, Council approved an agreement with Willdan Associates for
consulting services as assessment engineer for OtayValley Road Assessment
District 90-2 and Otay Rio Business Park Assessment District 89-3. This
item is to consider approval of the fIrst amendment to the contract for a
proposed expanded scope of work and includes an increase in the contract
amount. Adequate funds have already been appropriated by the
Redevelopment Agency for this capital improvement project which will also
cover the proposed increase in compensation for the additional work (996-
9960-ST123). Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of
Public Works)
13. RESOLUTION 16194 APPROVINGFOURlliAMENDMENTTOTIlEAGREEMENTBETWEENTIlE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA, TIlE CITY OF SAN DIEGO, AND TIlE SPRING
VALLEY SANITATION DISTRICT OF TIlE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, FOR
TIlE USE OF DISTRICf'S OUTFALL SEWER - On August 7, 1990, Council
approved the installation of seven sewage-flow meters at city connections
to the Spring Valley Sanitation District sewer lines. Our existing
agreement for the use of the District's outfall sewer must be revised to
include necessary provisions for the operation and maintenance of these
sewage metering stations and to clarify the method of determining service
charge for metered and unmetered sewage flows discharged by Chula Vista
into district lines. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director
of Public Works)
14. RESOLUTION 16202 ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR "WIDENING OF
TELEGRAPH CANYON ROAD/OTAY LAKES ROAD FROM APACHE DRIVE
TO RUTGERS AVENUE AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS' IN TIlE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA - On June 12, 1991, sealed bids were received for "Accepting
bids and awarding contract for "Widening of Telegraph Canyon Road/Otay
Lakes Road from Apache Drive to Rutgers Avenue and Channel
Improvements." A general description of the work to be done is as follows:
clearing of site, preparation of subgrade, grading, the placing of asphalt
concrete on imported base material, or on recycled A C. material, the
construction of P .C.C. curb, gutter, sidewalk, and pedestrian ramps, crib
walls, irrigation system and landscaping, pavement markers, traffic signals
and safety lighting systems, traffic interconnect conduit, construction of
underground and open channel drainage improvements, water and sewer
AGENDA
-4-
JUNE 18, 1991
facilities, and underground utilities (gas and electric). Staff recommends
that Council accept bids and award contract to Erreca's Inc. in the amount
of $4,697,582. (Director of Public Works)
15. RESOLUTION 16203 AFFIRMING TIlli TRIAL TRAFFIC REGULATION PARKING PROHIBITION
FOR VEHICLES OVER SIX FEET IN HEIGHf ON EAST FLOWER STREET -
A trial traffic regulation was established to prohibit vehicles over six feet
in height on East Flower Street from affecting visibility of motorists exiting
a driveway. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of
Public Works)
16. RESOLUTION 16204 ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACf FOR TREE TRIMMING
SERVICES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1990-91 IN 1HE OlY OF CHULA VISTA - On
May 22, 1991, sealed bids were received for "Tree Trimming Services for
Fiscal Year 1990-91." Funds for this project were budgeted in Fiscal Year
1990-91. The work to be done consists of trimming broadleaf, eucalyptus,
cocus palm, and date palm trees located on various streets in the city.
Staff recommends that Council accept bids and award contract to Tip Top
Tree Service, Inc. in the amount of $77,658 and authorize City Engineer to
execute change order with Tip Top Tree Service, Inc. to include additional
trees which require trimming. (Director of Public Works)
17. RESOLUTION 16205 ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACf FOR PARKING LOT
ADDITION, OTAY COMMUNllY CENTER, 1571 ALBANY AVENUE IN TIlli
a1Y OF CHULA VISTA, CAUFORNlA - On May 22, 1991, the Director of
Public Works received sealed bids for the parking lot addition at the Otay
Community Center, 1571 Albany Avenue. Funds for this project were
budgeted in Fiscal Year 1988-89. The project involves removal and
disposal of existing improvements, excavation and grading, asphalt
concrete paving, processed miscellaneous base, installing curb and gutter,
P.C.C. swale, sidewalk, landscaping and automatic irrigation system, and
other miscellaneous work shown on the plans. Staff recommends that
Council accept bids and award contract to Frank & Son Paving, Inc. in the
amount of $25,086.52. (Director of Public Works)
18. RESOLUTION 16206 ORDERING 1HE SUMMARY VACATION OF SEWER EASEMENT IN
WEATIlERSTONE SOUTIi, UNITS NUMBER 2 AND 3 - When Weatherstone
South, Units Number 2 and 3, subdivisions were developed in 1965, the
sewer main in the area was replaced by a main in Willowcrest Drive right-
of-way. Once the work was complete, the old easement containing the
abandoned sewer main was never vacated. The City is now initiating that
vacation. Staff recommends approval of the resolution and that the City
Clerk forward it to the County for recordation. (Director of Public Works)
19. RESOLUTION 16207 ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACf FOR ASPHALTIC
CONCRETE - Bids were opened on June 7, 1991 for furnishing the City's
requirements for asphalt concrete for street maintenance. The estimated
usage for sheet asphalt is 1,580 tons, 3/8" maximum aggregate 3,000 tons,
AGENDA
-5-
JUNE 18, 1991
and cold mix 420 tons. The material will be picked up at the vendors
plant. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Finance)
20. RESOLlJOON 16208 ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONI'RACf FOR ASPHALTIC
EMULSIONS - Bids were opened on June 7, 1991 for furnishing the City's
requirements for RS-2 asphaltic emulsions with latex for the chip-sealing
program. The estimated usage is 3,000 tons with the vendor to deliver and
spread material at work site. Staff recommends approval of the resolution.
(Director of Finance)
21. RESOLlJOON 16209 ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONI'RACf FOR SCREENINGS
(srONE CHIPS) - Bids were opened on June 7, 1991 for furnishing the
City's requirements for screenings (stone chips) for the chip-sealing
program. The estimated usage is 4,000 tons with delivery to be made to
the ciry yard. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of
Finance)
22. RESOLlJOON 16210 APPROVING CONI'RACf AND WAIVING BID REQUIREMENTS FOR
SERVICES OF A CONI'RACf PROJECf PLANNER FOR EASTI.AKE
PROJECTS - The Eastlake Development Company has filed applications for
several projects involving the Village Center and Eastlake Greens. Due to
the complexity of these projects and the applicant's desire to expedite
review, it is requested that a contract project planner be retained to
coordinate review of these projects. Staff recommends that Bud Gray be
retained for this purpose at a cost not to exceed $60,000. The full cost of
the contract would be borne by the applicant. (Director of Planning)
23. RESOLlJOON 16211 AUlHORIZING TIIE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A CONI'RACf FOR FIREWORKS
DISPLAY AND ENTERING INTO INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENTS -
Planning is being finalized for the annual Fourth of July Fireworks Display
to be held in the Chula Vista bayfront. The event has been highly
successful during the past several years and is expected to draw an even
larger crowd this summer. Staff recommends approval of the resolution to
execute a contract with San Diego Fireworks, Inc. and to enter into an
Indemnification Agreement with Rohr Industries for the use of their
parking facilities, and with the San Diego Unified Port District. (Director
of Parks & Recreation)
24. RESOLlJOON 16212 FINDING TIiAT TIIE SALARIES OF TIIE MID-MANAGEMENf, EXECUTIVE
AND UNREPRESENTED GROUPS ARE UNFIXED AND UNCERTAIN AS OF
JUNE 29, 1991 - The consulting firm of Ralph Anderson & Associates is in
the process of completing the Mid-Management salary survey started earlier
this year. Additionally, Personnel Department staff is in the process of
conducting Executive and Unrepresented salary surveys. While the IAPF,
PO^, and CVEA bargaining units will receive salary increases effective June
28, 1991, it is clear that recommendations will not be formulated for these
groups by that date. Therefore, it is recommended that these salaries
remain unfixed and uncertain until such time as the City Manager makes
AGENDA
-6-
JUNE 18, 1991
formal recommendations as to the appropriate salary increases for
classifications in each of these groups. Staff recommends approval of the
resolution. (Director of Personnel)
25.A REPORT APPUCATION FOR RENTAL REHABIUTATION PROGRAM FUNDS FOR
FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 . The City participated in the United States
Department of Housing and Urban Development Rental Rehabilitation
Program during Fiscal Year 1990-91. In order to receive funding for Fiscal
Year 1991-92, an approved application must be submitted. (Director of
Community Development)
B. RESOLUTION 16213 APPROVING RENTAL REHABIUTATION PROGRAM DESCRIPTION AND
RELATED DOCUMENTS, AND AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL TO HlJD - Staff
recommends approval of the resolution.
26.A REPORT PROPOSE MODIFICATION OF MUNICIPAL CODE, SECTION 17.07.030 TO
PROVIDE AN ADDmONAL CONTINGENCY RESERVE - On April 16, 1991,
the City Council adopted Resolution 16133 directing the City Engineer to
prepare and file reports of assessments for all existing City Open Space
Maintenance Districts. These reports have been prepared, and the
resolution approves and sets the date for a public hearing to consider the
spreading of assessment. The report considers modification of the 1972
Act to allow the reserve to be increased up to an additional 50% of the
estimated yearly cost. Staff recommends approval of the resolution.
(Director of Public Works)
B. RESOLUTION 16214 APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORTS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92
SPREAD OF ASSESSMENTS FOR CITY OPEN SPACE MAINTENANCE
DISTRICTS 1-11, 14, 15, 17, 18, 20, EASTI.AKE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NUMBER ONE, BAY BOULEVARD AND TOWN CENTRE, DECLARING THE
INfENTION TO LEVY AND COllECT ASSESSMENTS AND SETTING JULY
9, 1991 AT 6:00 P.M. AS THE DATE AND TIME FOR THE PUBUC
HEARING
* * END OF CONSENT CALENDAR * *
PUBUC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
The following items have been advertised and/or posted as publil: hearings as required by law. If you wish to speak
to any item, please fill out the "Request to Speak Form" available in the lobby and submit it to the CiJy Clerk prior
to the meeting. (Complete the green form to speak in favor of the staff recommendation; complete the pink form
to speak in opposition to the staff recommendation.) Comments are limited to five minutes per individuaL
27.
PUBUC HEARING
CONSIDERATION OF A RATE INCREASE FOR TRASH SERVICE PROVIDED
BY LAIDLAW WASTE SYSfEMS, INC. - Continued from the meeting of June
11, 1991. Staff requests the item be continued to July 16, 1991.
(Assistant City Manager)
AGENDA
-7-
JUNE 18, 1991
28. PUBIJC HEARING CI1Y INITIATED PROPOSAL TO AMEND GENERAL PLAN AND ZONING
RECLASSIFICATION TO RESOLVE INCONSISTENCIES - City initiated
proposal to amend the territoty known as Subarea 2 of Part III located
within the central Chula Vista community. Based on the Initial Study and
Negative Declaration, staff fmds that the proposed rezoning and General
Plan amendments will have no significant environmental impacts. Staff
recommends adoption of the Negative Declaration, place the ordinance on
first reading and adopt the resolution. (Director of Planning)
A. ORDINANCE 2465 REZONING CERTAIN TERRITORY KNOWN AS SUBARFA 2 OF PART III,
WITHIN STIlDY AREA B, AND GENERALLY LOCATED WITIiIN THE
CENTRAL CHULA VISTA COMMUNl1Y, EAST OF FOURTII AVENUE
BElWEEN "E" AND DAVIDSON STREETS, TO REQUIRE A PRECISE PLAN
FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF PARCELS WITIiIN THE AREA DEPICTED ON
EXHIBIT A ATTACHED HERETO (first readinl()
B. RESOLlJIlON 16215 AMENDING THE CHULA VISTA GENERAL PLAN FOR SUBAREA 2 OF PART
III OF SPECIAL STIlDY AREA B-1 IN CENTRAL CHULA VISTA TO CHANGE
THE LAND USE DESIGNATION FROM "HIGH" TO A DESIGNATION OF
"PROFESSIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE COMMERCIAL"
29. PUBIJC HEARING CONSIDERATION TO ESTABUSH FEES FOR SECURJ1Y ALARM PERMITS -
Currently the Police Department is responding to 550 security alarms every
month. This is very time consuming for patrol officers and office staff who
must monitor these alarms and apply the provisions of the Alarm
Ordinance, Section 9.06 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code. Staff plans to
alleviate this problem with changes in the Alarm Ordinance and
contracting with an alarm tracking company to monitor the alarm
ordinance. Staff recommends Council place ordinance on first reading and
approve the resolution. Continued from the meeting of May 14, 1991.
(Chief of Police)
A ORDINANCE 2457 AMENDING OWTER 9.06 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO
REGULATION OF SECURJ1Y ALARM PERMITS (firsr readinl()
B. RESOLlJIlON 16168 APPROVING AMENDMENT TO MASTER FEE SCHEDULE FOR SECURITY
ALARM PERMITS
30. PUBUC HEARING CONSIDERATION OF THE ADOPTION OF THE BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR
1991-92 WHICH INCLUDES ESTABIJSHlNG AN APPROPRIATIONS UMIT
FOR FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 1992 - The City Council has
reviewed the proposed Fiscal Year 1991-92 operating and capital budgets
through a series of budget review workshops. In accordance with the City
Charter, a public hearing is now required to consider the general City
budget. Staff recommends that Council accept public testimony and adopt
the proposed budget as amended during the review sessions and as a result
of the public hearing. (City Manager)
Government Code Section 7910 requires each local government to establish
an appropriations limit by resolution each year at a regularly scheduled
meeting. Staff recommends approval of the resolution establishing an
AGENDA
-8-
JUNE 18, 1991
appropriations limit of $49,635,708 for Fiscal Year 1991-92. (Director of
Finance)
A. RESOLUTION 16216 APPROVING BUDGET FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92
B. RESOLUTION 16217 ADOPTING AN APPROPRIATIONS UMIT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1991-92
31. PUBUC HEARING CONSIDERATION OF WATER CONSERVATION PLAN AND AIR QUAUlY
IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR RANCHO DEL REY SPAS II AND III;
CONSIDERATION OF RANCHO DEL REY SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA III
DESIGN GUlDEUNES; pCS-9(M)2: REQUEST TO SUBDMDE 404.9 ACRES
KNOWN AS RANCHO DEL REY SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA III, CHULA
VISTA TRACT NUMBER 9(M)2 LOCATED BETWEEN EAST "If' STREET
AND TELEGRAPH CANYON ROAD, IMMEDIATELY SOUTH OF RANCH DEL
REY SPA I, RANCHO DEL REY PARTNERSHIP - The tentative map for SPA
III includes 405 acres located between "H" Street and Telegraph Canyon
Road and immediately west of Paseo Ladero. The project includes lotting
for 1,380 dwelling units, a 26+ acre Junior High School site, a 10.8 acre
park, and a community purpose site of nearly two acres as well as 148
acres of open space. The SPA plan for this project was approved in
January of this year. Included in the request for approval are design
guidelines, an air quality plan, a water conservation plan, and a mitigation
monitoring program. Staff recommends Council recertify that the final
EIR-89-10 for Rancho del Rey SPA III has been prepared in compliance
with CEQA, the state CEQA guidelines, and the environmental review
procedure of the City of Chula Vista; and adopt the following resolutions.
(Director of Planning)
A. RESOLUTION 16218 RECERTIFYING THAT THE FINAL E1R-89-10 FOR RANCHO DEL REY SPA
III HAS BEEN PREPARED IN COMPUANCE WITH CEQA, THE STATE CEQA
GillDEUNES AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW PROCEDURES OF THE
CIlY OF CHULA VISTA. This resolution does not require a public hearing,
but is a related item.
B. RESOLUTION 16219 APPROVING THE WATER CONSERVATION PLAN FOR RANCHO DEL REY
SPAS II AND III WITH AMENDMENTS PER ATTACHMENT I
C. RESOLUTION 16220 APPROVING THE AIR QUAUlY IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR RANCHO DEL
REY SPAS II AND III
D. RESOLUTION 16221 APPROVING THE DESIGN GillDEUNES FOR RANCHO DEL REY SPA III
E. RESOLUTION 16222 APPROVING THE TENTATIVE SUBDMSION MAP FOR RANCHO DEL REY
SPA III
F. RESOLUTION 16223 AMENDING THE CEQA FINDINGS FOR E1R-89-10, RANCHO DEL REY SPA
III
G. RESOLUTION 16224 AMENDING THE MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM FOR EIR-89-10,
RANCHO DEL REY SPA III
AGENDA
-9-
JUNE 18, 1991
32. PUBUC HEARING CONSIDERING ESTABUSHlNG INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER DISCHARGE
PERMIT FEES - Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations
mandate the inclusion of certain industrial waste and other provision's in
the City Code. A review of various code chapters relating to wastewater
and the design, construction, use, permitting and funding of wastewater
facilities showed the current code to be faulted in many respects.
Consequently, it was determined that the code should be revised not only
to accommodate EPA mandated revisions, but so as to upgrade the
remaining portions of the code relating to sewage and public sewage
facilities. This item further involves a public hearing concerning the
establishment of industrial wastewater discharge permit fees. Staff
recommends Council place ordinance on first reading and approve the
resolution. (Director of Public Works)
A ORDINANCE 2466 ADDING CHAPTERS 3.14 AND 3.20, AMENDING SECTION 3.16.010,
REPEAUNG CHAPTER 3.20, TITLE 13 AND CHAPTERS 13.04 THROUGH
13.44 OF TITLE 13, ADDING A NEW TITLE AND NEW CHAPTERS 13.02
THROUGH 13.14 THEREIN, ADDING A NEW TITLE 14 AND
RENUMBERING CHAPTERS 13.48 THROUGH 13.68 TOlliE CHULA VISTA
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO SEWERS AND WATERCOURSES
B. RESOLUTION 16225 AMENDING MASTER FEE SCHEDULE TO MAKE TECHNICAL
REORGANIZATIONAL CHANGES AND ESTABUSH NEW INDUSTRIAL
WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT FEES
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
This is an opportunily for the general publk to oddress the City Couni:iI 011 any subject matter within the Couni:iI's
jurisdiction that is not an item 011 this agenda. (State law, Iwwever, genually prohibits the City Couni:iI from
taking action 011 any issues not induded 011 the posted agentla.) If you wish to oddress the Council 011 such a
subject, please complete the yellow "Request to SpeaIc Under Oral CommunU:ations Form" available in the Iabby
and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Those who wish to speak, please give your 1UlTfU: and oddress
for record purposes and follow up action. Your time is limited to three minutes per speaker.
ACTION ITEMS
The items listed in this section of the agenda are erpected to elkit substantiJJl discussions and deliberations by the
Council, staff, or members of the genual public. The items wiIl be considered individually by the Couni:iI and staff
recommendations may in certain cases be presented in the alternative. Those who wish to speak, please fill out
a "Request to Speak" form available in the Iabby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Public
comments are limited to five minutes.
33. RESOLUTION 16226 ADOPTING A MODIFIED SEWER RATE FOR MULTI-FAMILY LOTS WITH
MULTIPLE WATER METERS AND AMENDING lliE MASTER FEE
SCHEDULE - Concerns were addressed to Council on June 4, 1991
regarding the costs involved in connection with the sewer bills on rental
property located at 244/246 AND 248/250 "G" Street. The rental units are
individually metered creating higher monthly sewer bills than comparable
multi-family properties with a single water meter.
AGENDA
-10-
JUNE 18, 1991
BOARD AND COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
This is the time the City Couru:il will consider iJems which luwe been forwarded to them for consideration by one
of the City's Boards, Commissions and/or Committees-
None submitted.
ITEMS pUIJ.EI) FROM 1lffi CONSENT CALENDAR
This is the time the City Council will discuss iJems which luwe been removed from the Consent Calendm. Agenda
items puJ1ed at the request of the public will be considered prior to those puJ1ed by CounciJnrembers. Public
comments are limited to five minutes per individual
OTIIER BUSINESS
34. CIlY MANAGER'S REPORTCS)
a. Scheduling of meetings.
35. MAYOR'S REPORTCS)
a. Review of policy regarding public safety assessment districts
36. COUNCIL COMMENfS
Councilman Moore
Supervisor Leon Williams request for creation of a San Diego County Regional Airport Authority
Exploration Committee - Should Chula Vista request representation on the committee?
ADJOURNMENT
The City Council will meet in a closed session immediately following the Council meeting to discuss:
Pending litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 - Chula Vista versus State of
California CTV
The meeting will adjourn to (a closed session and thence to) the Regular City Council Meeting on July 9,
1991 at 4:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers.
A Special Joint Meeting of the City Council and Redevelopment Agency will be held immediately after the
City Council meeting.
\
.,
WEhCOME TO TIIE CITY COUNCIL MEETING
The Chula Vista City Council welcomes you and encourages your continued interest and
involvement in the City's decision-making process.
Copies of reports, resolutions, and ordinances considered by the City Council are available
at the City Clerk's Office, and a reference copy is available in the lobby outside the Council
Chamber before and during the Council meeting.
ADDRESSING lliE CITY COUNCIL
If you wish to speak to the City Council on any item listed on the Council agenda, please
fill out a green or pink Request to Speak form available in the lobby and submit it to the
City Clerk prior to the meeting. (Complete the green form to speak in favor of the staff
recommendation on the item; complete the pink form to speak in opposition to the staff
recommendation) .
If you wish to speak to the City Council on any subject matter within the Council's
jurisdiction that is not an item listed on the Agenda, please fill out a yellow Request to
Speak During Oral Communications form available in the lobby and submit it to the City
Clerk prior to the meeting.
The Mayor will call you to the microphone at the appropriate time if you have filled out
a Request to Speak form. At that time, please approach the lectern, clearly state your name
and address, and proceed to make your comments. The timer in front of the Mayor will
indicate how much time you have remaining to speak.
VIDEOTAPING OF COUNCIL MEETINGS
The regular Tuesday City Council meetings are videotaped and replayed on Wednesday at
7:00 p.m. on Cox Cable Channel 11 and Chula Vista Cable Channel 47. Videotape copies
(VHS) of the Tuesday Council meetings are available for check-out on the Thursday
following the meeting at the Chula Vista Public library, 365 "P" Street.
ASSISTANCE FOR HEARING IMPAIRED
The Council Chamber is equipped with two types of assists to its sound system. The City
Clerk can provide specific information on these assists.
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item 4b-
Meeting Date 6/18/91
SUBMITTED BY:
Resolution I t..!J.O I Reciting the Fact of the Special Municipal Election held on
June 4, 1991, declaring the result arM such other matters as provided by law.
"j2. ,~~
Beverly A. Authelet, Ci; ~~
ITEM TITLE:
(4/5ths Vote: Yes_ No.x)
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council declare the results of the Special Municipal
Election which was held on June 4, 1991 for the position of Mayor which has been certified to us by the
Registrar of Voters.
BACKGROUND: On February 26, 1991, City Council approved Resolution 16077 which called a special
municipal election to be held on June 4, 1991 for the election of Mayor to fill the unexpired term created
by the demise of Mayor Gayle McCandliss. The Resolution also requested the Registrar of Voters to conduct
the election. The election has been held, the ballots have been canvassed by the Registrar of Voters, and
the results have been certified to us.
Attach: Resolution
I/b-I
RESOLUTION NO. f~W /
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA,
CALIFORNIA, RECITING THE FACT OF THE SPECIAL MUNICIPAL
ELECTION HELD ON JUNE 4, 1991, DECLARING THE RESULT AND SUCH
OTHER MATTERS AS PROVIDED BY LAW
WHEREAS, a Special Municipal Election was held and conducted in the City of Chula Vista,
California, on Tuesday, June 4, 1991, as required by law; and
WHEREAS, notice of the election was given in time, form, and manner as provided by law; that
voting precincts were properly established; that election officers were appointed and that in all respects the
election was held and conducted and the votes were cast, received and canvassed and the returns made and
declared in time, form and manner as required by the provisions of the Elections Code of the State of
California for the holding of elections in charter cities; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Resolution No. 16077 adopted February 26, 1991, the Registrar of Voters
canvassed the returns of the election and has certified the results to the City Council, the results are received
and made a part hereof as Exhibit" A."
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DOES HEREBY RESOLVE,
DECLARE, DETERMINE, AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1.
12,436; and
That the whole number of ballots cast in the City excluding absent voter ballots was
That the whole number of absent voter ballots cast in the City was 4,004 votes,
making a total of 16,440 votes cast in the City.
SECTION 2.
That the names of persons voted for at the election for Mayor are as follows:
Name:
Tim Nader
Frank Scott
Chris Chase
Nick Aguilar
Bob Beyerle
Robert "Bob" Piantedosi
David E. Campbell
Fred Drew
G.L. "Jerry" Forbes
Joseph o. Albert
Mark Boltz
Count: Percent:
5,878 36.14
3,355 20.63
2,753 16.93
2,154 13.24
475 2.92
463 2.85
450 2.77
324 1.99
251 1.54
112 0.69
50 0.31
SECTION 3. That the number of votes given at each precinct and the number of votes given in
the City to each of the persons above named for the office of mayor for which the persons were candidates
were as listed in Exhibit "N attached.
SECTION 4. The City Council does declare and determine that Tim Nader was elected as Mayor
for the 3 112 year unexpired term created by the demise of Gayle McCandliss who had been elected as
mayor at the November 4, 1990 general municipal election.
Jfb-J.
'""r.'J"'IC"""'''''
::',,..,,.,..-'-""..,,,
Resolution No. .....
Page 2
SECTION 5. The City Clerk shall enter on the records of the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista, a statement of the result of the election, showing: (1) the whole number of ballots case in the City;
(2) the names of the persons voted for; and (3) the number of votes given at each precinct to each person.
SECTION 6. The City Clerk shall immediately make and deliver to the person so elected a
Certificate of Election signed by the City Clerk and authenticated; the City Clerk shall also administer to each
person elected the Oath of Office prescribed in the Constitution of the State of California and the Charter
of the City of Chula Vista. The person so elected shall then be inducted into the office to which he has been
elected.
PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED this 18th day of June, 1991.
Presented by:
Approved as to form:
Bruce M. Boogaard, City Attorney
Beverly A Authelet, City Clerk
1b-3
~
cs-
,
~
CERTIFICATE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
) 88.
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO)
I, CONNY B. McCORMACK, Registrar of Voters of the County of San
Diego, do hereby certify that I have conducted the official canvass of
the returns from the Special Election held on June 4, 1991, and that
the following is a statement of the result showing the total number of
ballots cast; the total number of votes cast for each candidate; and/or
the total number of votes cast for and against each measure.
witness my hand and official seal this 10th of June, 1991.
~
O:l
::j
~
~ ~ fi/jW J?I/J-(' /.:
ONNY B. McCORMACK
Registrar of Voters
;c
.,.
~
o
"
~
o'
::s
Z
o
",,'
'" *
()q *
11> *
*
w *
8 \
R L T \
E T U \ A 8
G S R \ A G E
N \ L U V
V C \ 8 I 0 E
T A 0 \ E L R R
R S U \ R A E L
S T T \ T ,. R ,. W ,. E ,.
(HULA VISTA 525100 728 106 14.6 3 2.9 23 21.9 5 4.8 1 1.0
(HULA VISTA 525200 496 41 8.3 4 10.0 1 2.5
(HULA VISTA 525400 594 156 26.3 9 5.8 1 .6 12 7.8
(HULA VISTA 525500 632 194 30.7 .5 25 12.9 3 1.5 14 7.2
(HULA VISTA 525600 552 155 28.1 7 4.5 4 2.6 5 3.2
(HULA VISTA 525700 380 112 29.5 3 2.7 5 4.5 2 1.8
(HULA VISTA 525800 876 191 21.8 2 1.1 27 14.2 4 2.1 15 7.9
(HULA VISTA 525900 1,029 183 17.8 19 10.6 6 3.4 3 1.7 \()
(HULA VISTA 526100 476 56 11.8 4 7.1 1 1.8
(HULA VISTA 526400 786 111 21.8 2 1.2 16 9.4 11 6.4
(HULA VISTA 526600 602 195 32.4 25 13.0 .5 7 3.6 I
(HULA VISTA 526700 915 306 33.4 3 1.0 11 3.6 .3 3D 9.8 ~
(HULA VISTA 526810 869 210 24.2 1 .5 24 11.5 .5 6 2.9
(HULA VISTA 526900 775 142 18.3 33 23.1 5 3.6
(HULA VISTA 527000 1.006 174 17.3 2 1.1 32 18.4 3 1.7 4 2.3
(HULA VISTA 527400 770 131 17.0 I .8 13 10.0 1 .8 3 2.3
(HULA VISTA 527700 739 238 32.2 2 .8 20 8.4 1 .4 14 5.9
(HULA VI STA 527800 869 208 23.9 I .5 16 7.8 1 .5 18 8.8
(HULA VISTA 528100 878 178 20.3 2 1.1 44 25.0 4 2.3 9 5.1
(HULA VISTA 528300 715 213 29.8 3 1.4 15 7.1 1 .5 10 4.7
(HULA VISTA 528500 707 201 28.4 1 .5 12 6.0 2 1.0 12 6.0
(HULA VISTA 528600 689 237 34.4 23 9.7 4 1.7 11 4.7
(HULA VISTA 528800 794 293 36.9 2 .7 23 7.8 1 .3 3 1.0
(HULA VISTA 528900 653 171 27. 1 17 9.6 2 1.1 1 .6
(HULA VISTA 528910 895 235 26.3 3 1.3 47 20.0 3 1.3 1 .4
(HULA VISTA 528920 750 172 22.9 1 .6 32 18.6 4 2.3 3 1.7
(HULA VISTA 528930 356 107 30.1 16 15.0 3 2.8
. (HULA VISTA 529000 557 224 40.2 2 .9 17 7.6 8 3.6
. (HULA VISTA 529110 686 198 28.9 2 1.0 17 8.6 5 2.5 5 2.5
.
. (HULA VISTA 529300 779 250 32.1 17 6.9 2 .8 10 4.0
.
0 (HULA VI STA 529500 758 179 23.6 I .6 9 5.1 4 2.3 3 1.7
Z (HULA VISTA 529520 824 136 16.5 3 2.2 19 14.0 1 .7 5 3.7
(HULA VISTA 529600 753 154 20.5 1 .7 11 7.2 3 2.0 1 .7
<: CHULA VISTA 529700 854 112 13.1 3 2.7 26 23.2 3 2.7 3 2.7
0
'0 (HULA VISTA 529900 701 126 18.0 2 1.7 3D 25.0 7 5.8 3 2.5
" ... (HULA VISTA 530200 892 248 27.8 2 .8 28 11.3 I .4 8 3.2
"0
'" ~ CHULA VISTA 530400 538 153 28.4 5 3.3 7 4.6
<Ii ..
<>:: ."
B \
R L T \
E T U \ A B
G S R \ A G E
N \ L U Y
Y C \ B I 0 E
T A 0 \ E L R R
R S U \ R A E L
S T T \ T % R % w % E %
(HULA VISTA 530500 644 143 22.2 16 11.3 5 3.5 4 2.B
CHULA VISTA 530600 B9B 222 24.7 2 .9 28 12.6 5 2.3 8 3.6
(HULA VISTA 530100 890 222 24.9 3 I.A 21 9.6 13 5.9
(HULA VISTA 530900 19A 2.7 27.3 1 .5 20 9.2 5 2.3 9 4.1
(HULA VISTA 531000 1,026 194 18.9 1 .5 39 20.6 4 2.1 6 3.2
(HULA VISTA 531300 640 130 20.3 2 1.6 36 27.9 4 3. . 3 2.3
(HULA VISTA 531400 1,069 179 16.7 2 1.2 29 16.8 6 3.5 3 1.7
(HULA VISTA 531410 1.025 162 15.8 2 1.3 42 26.4 5 3.1 2 1.3
(HULA VISTA 531510 772 89 11.5 2 2.2 17 19.1 4 4.5 2 2.2
(HULA VISTA 531700 963 210 21.8 4 1.9 38 18.4 5 2.4 2 1.0
~ (HULA VISTA 531800 873 173 19.8 1 .6 38 22.0 5 2.9 5 2.9
(HULA VISTA 531830 1,038 239 23.0 2 .8 44 18.5 5 2.1 10 4.2
(HULA VISTA 532100 751 112 14.9 20 18.0 3 2.7 1 .9
\ (HULA VISTA 532110 887 146 16.5 3 2. I 37 25.9 9 6.3
6- (HULA VISTA 532200 922 154 16.7 41 26.8 6 3.9 5 3.3
(HULA VISTA 532210 707 66 9.3 16 24.2 3 4.5 5 7.6
(HULA VISTA 532300 825 139 16.8 2 1.5 28 20.4 1 .7 1 .7
(HULA VISTA 532310 884 186 21.0 29 15.8 8 4.3 3 1.6
(HULA VISTA 532490 772 151 19.6 13 8.6
(HULA VISTA 532500 654 154 23.5 .6 14 9.1 5 3.2
(HULA VISTA 532580 1.054 185 17.6 30 16.2 2 1.1 2 '.1
(HULA VISTA 532590 734 14. 19.2 36 25.5 2 1.4
CHULA VISTA 532600 9'6 243 26.5 17 7.0 5 2.1
(HULA VISTA 532610 1.042 183 11.6 27 14.8 1 3.8 4 2.2
(HULA VISTA 532630 804 139 17.3 1 .7 18 12.9 2 1.4 4 2.9
(HULA VISTA 532640 683 165 24.2 2 1.2 19 11.5 2 1.2
(HULA VISTA 532660 1,030 148 14.4 2. 14.2 . .7
(HULA VISTA 532710 236 74 31.4 3 4.1 4 5.5 I 1.4
(HULA VISTA 532120 736 169 23.0 24 14.2
(HULA VISTA 531100 670 132 19.1 16 12.1 5 3.8 3 2.3 ~
(HULA VISTA 531110 428 40 9.3 6 15.0 1 2.5
(HULA VISTA 538100 610 124 20.3 1 .8 34 28.1 4 3.3 .8 ~
0
(HULA VISTA 538300 505 97 19.2 4 4.2 40 42.1 "
(HULA VISTA 538400 801 136 17.0 1 .7 41 30.6 1 .7 2 1.5 M
(HULA VISTA 538600 695 156 22.4 4 2.6 9 5.9 3 2.0 2 1.3 O'
::J
(HULA VISTA 538800 681 145 21.3 26 18.2 4 2.8 3 2.1 Z
(HULA VISTA 539000 1,023 .89 18.5 3 1.6 80 42.6 6 3.2 ?
'" .
"
TOTAL 57.394 16,440 28.6 112 . 7 2,154 13.2 324 2.0 475 2.9 O<l .
" .
.
U1 .
,
<<
<<
<<
<<
<<
ci
Z
<=I
o
'j;l
;:l'il
"0 "
'" bO
'" '"
~""
(HULA VISTA
(HULA VISTA
(HULA VI STA
(HULA VI ST.&.
(HULA VISTA
(HULA VI ST.&.
[HULA VISTA
(HULA VISTA
(HULA VISTA
[HULA VI STA
(HULA VISTA
(HULA VISTA
(HULA VI ST A
(HULA VI SrA
(HULA VISTA
(HULA VISTA
(HULA VI ST.&.
(HULA VISTA
(HULA VISTA
(HULA VISTA
(HULA VI STA
(HULA VI STA
(HULA VI STA
(HULA VISTA
[HULA VISTA
(HULA VISTA
CHULA VISTA
(HULA VISTA
(HULA VISTA
(HULA VI STA
(HULA VISTA
(HULA VISTA
(HULA VISTA
(HULA VI STA
CHULA VISTA
(HULA VISTA
(HULA VISTA
525100
525200
525400
525500
525600
525700
525800
525900
526100
526400
526600
526700
526810
526900
527000
527400
527100
527800
528100
528300
528500
528600
528800
528900
528910
528920
528930
529000
529110
529300
529500
529520
529600
529700
529900
530200
530400
R
E
G
V
T
R
S
728
496
594
632
552
380
876
1,029
476
786
602
915
869
775
1,006
770
739
869
878
715
707
689
794
653
895
750
356
557
688
779
758
824
753
854
70.
892
538
8
L
T
S
C
A
S
T
106
41
156
194
'55
112
191
183
56
171
195
306
210
142
174
131
238
208
178
213
201
237
293
177
235
172
107
224
198
250
179
136
154
112
126
248
153
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
T
U
R
N
14.6
8.3
26.3
30.7
28.1
29.5
21.8
17.8
11.8
21.8
32.4
33.4
24.2
18.3
17 .3
17.0
32.2
23.9
20.3
29.8
28.4
34.4
36.9
27.1
26.3
22.9
30.1
40.2
28.9
32.1
23.6
16.5
20.5
13.1
18.0
27. 8
28.4
o
U
T
8
o
L
T
2
3
1
2
4
1
4
1
2
I
,.
N
A
o
E
R
1.9
.9
.5
.6
.5
.7
1.9
.7
2.3
.5
1.0
.4
.4
.7
.4
.7
44
16
63
44
37
30
67
63
31
52
72
89
70
50
84
56
65
57
50
77
64
77
93
66
90
69
30
73
61
74
58
41
61
40
47
78
70
41.9
40.0
40.9
22.7
23.9
27.0
35.3
35.2
55.4
30.4
37.3
29.2
33.7
36.0
48.3
43.1
27.4
27.8
28.4
36.3
32.0
32.6
31.7
37.3
38.3
40.1
28.0
32.7
30.8
30.0
32.8
30. I
40. I
35.7
39.2
31.5
45.8
C
A
M
p
8
E
L
,. L
2
2
4
5
7
4
2
5
4
4
1.9
5.0
2.6
2.6
4.5
3.6
1.1
2.8
7.1
2.3
5
6
2
2
7
8
10
7
4
5
4
19
2
6
2
1.6
2.9
1.4
1.1
5.4
3.4
4.9
4.0
1.9
2.5
1.7
6.5
1.1
2.6
1.2
3
5
8
11
2
9
5
5
1
4
1.3
2.5
3.2
6.2
1.5
5.9
4.5
4.2
.4
2.6
,.
C
H
A
S
E
,.
12
8
27
25
22
39
20
38
6
46
31
81
32
22
19
14
53
27
21
32
35
52
68
27
43
28
25
33
61
53
48
36
22
15
7
51
23
11.4
20.0
17.5
12.9
14.2
35.1
10.5
21.2
10.7
26.9
16.1
26.6
15.4
15.8
10.9
10.8
22.4
13.2
11.9
15.1
17 .5
22.0
23.2
15.3
18.3
16.3
23.4
14.8
30.8
21.5
27.1
26.5
14.5
13.4
5.8
20.6
15.0
,.......
I
~
~
B \
R L T \ C
E T U \ A
G S R \ II
N \ B N P C
v C \ 0 A B H
T A 0 \ L D E A
R S U \ T E L S
S T T \ 2 " R " L " E "
(HULA VISTA 530500 644 143 22.2 39 27.5 1 .7 43 3D.3
(HULA VISTA 5306DD 898 222 24.7 .5 91 41.0 6 2.7 34 15.3
(HULA VISTA 530700 890 222 24.9 lD2 46.6 2 .9 37 16.9
CHULA VISTA 53090D 794 217 27.3 79 36.4 45 20.7
(HULA VISTA 531000 1,026 194 18.9 B 1 42.9 8 4.2 26 13.8
(HULA VISTA 531300 64D 130 20.3 51 39.5 3 2.3 19 14.7
(HULA VISTA 531400 1,069 179 16.7 .6 82 47.4 4 2.3 22 12.7
..J:: (HULA VISTA 531410 1.025 162 15.8 72 45.3 6 3.B 14 8.8
(HULA VISTA 531510 772 B9 11.5 3B 42.7 4 4.5 9 10.1
~ (HULA VISTA 531700 963 210 21.8 .5 87 42.2 5 2.4 23 11.2
(HULA VISTA 531BOO B73 173 19.8 66 38.2 1 .6 2D 11.6
\ (HULA VISTA 531830 1.038 239 23.0 .4 93 39.1 5 2.1 38 16.0
~ (HULA VISTA 532100 751 112 14.9 56 50.5 I .9 13 11.7
(HULA VISTA 532110 887 146 16.5 .7 59 41.3 2 1.4 6 4.2
(HULA VISTA 532200 922 154 16.7 51 33.3 4 2.6 9 5.9
(HULA VISTA 532210 7D7 66 9.3 29 43.9 B 12.1
(HULA VISTA 532300 825 139 16.8 69 50.4 1 .7 15 10.9
(HULA VISTA 53231D BB4 186 21.0 79 42.9 7 3.8 27 14.7
(HULA VISTA 532490 772 151 19.6 49 32.5 45 29.8
(HULA VISTA 532500 654 154 23.5 .6 43 21.9 5 3.2 47 30.5
(HULA VISTA 53258D 1,054 185 17 .6 BO 43.2 44 23.8
(HULA VISTA 532590 734 141 19.2 45 31.9 6 4.3 32 22.7
(HULA VISTA 5326DD 916 243 26.5 91 37.4 8 3.3 68 28.0
(HULA VISTA 532610 1.042 183 17 .6 71 38.8 3 1.6 41 22.4
(HULA VISTA 532630 804 139 17 .3 50 36.0 4 2.9 31 22.3
(HULA VISTA 532640 683 165 24.2 56 33.9 2 1.2 32 19.4
(HULA VISTA 53266D 1,030 148 14.4 62 41.9 5 3.4 39 26.4
CHULA VISTA 532710 236 74 31.4 28 38.4 1 1.4 13 17 .8 ~
CHULA VISTA 532720 736 169 23.0 .6 53 31.4 3 1.8 54 32.D ~
0
CHULA VISTA 537700 670 132 19.7 .8 49 37.1 4 3.D 10 7.6 2"
CHULA VISTA 537710 428 4D 9.3 22 55.0 D.
(HULA VISTA 538100 610 124 20.3 47 38.8 5 4.1 lD 8.3 0
CHULA VISTA 538300 5D5 97 19.2 22 23.2 1 1.1 9 9.5 ::l
CHULA VISTA 538400 8Dl 136 17.0 .7 45 33.6 2 1.5 13 9.7 Z
0
CHULA VISTA 538600 695 156 22.4 62 40.8 2 1.3 28 18.4 """
CHULA VISTA 5388DD 681 145 21.3 " 7 47 32.9 3 2.1 21 14.7 0> .
OQ .
CHULA VISTA 539000 1,023 189 18.5 74 39.4 4 2.1 9 4.8 .. .
.
...., .
TOTAL 57,39. 16,..0 28.6 50 .3 5,878 36.1 450 2.8 2,753 16.9
\ p
B \ I
R L T \ A
E T U \ N
G S R \ T F
N \ S E 0
V C \ C 0 R
T A 0 \ 0 0 B
R S U \ T S E
S T T \ T % I % S %
CHULA VISTA 525100 72B 106 14.6 9 8.6 4 3.8 2 1.9
(HULA VISTA 525200 496 41 8.3 9 22.5
(HULA VISTA 525400 594 156 26.3 29 18.8 3 1.9 3 1.9
(HULA VISTA 525500 632 194 30.7 70 36.1 7 3.6
(HULA VISTA 525600 552 155 28.1 64 41.3 9 5.8 0---
(HULA VISTA 525700 380 112 29.5 26 23.4 I .9
(HULA VISTA 525800 876 191 21. B 45 23.7 5 2.6 2 1.1 \
(HULA VISTA 525900 1.029 183 17 .8 29 16.2 10 5.6 5 2.8
(HULA VISTA 526100 476 56 11.8 2 3.6 8 14.3 ~
(HULA VISTA 526400 786 171 21.8 36 21.1 3 1.8 1 .6
(HULA VISTA 526600 602 195 32.4 48 24.9 5 2.6 3 1.6
(HULA VISTA 526700 915 306 33.4 75 24.6 6 2.0 2 .7
(HULA VISTA 526810 869 210 24.2 59 2B.4 4 1.9 1 .5
(HULA VISTA 526900 775 142 18.3 19 13.7 5 3.6 2 1.4
(HULA VISTA 527000 1.006 174 17.3 17 9.8 5 2.9 2 1.1
(HULA VISTA 527400 770 131 17.0 30 23.1 3 2.3 2 1.5
(HULA VISTA 527100 739 238 32.2 67 28.3 7 3.0
(HULA VISTA 527800 869 208 23.9 63 30.1 12 5.9
(HULA VISTA 528100 878 178 20.3 28 15.9 10 5.7 1 .6
(HULA VISTA 528300 715 213 29.8 62 29.2 6 2.8 1 .5
(HULA VISTA 528500 707 201 28.4 62 31.0 3 1.5 2 1.0
(HULA VISTA 528600 689 237 34.4 62 26.3 2 .8
(HULA VISTA 528800 794 293 36.9 76 25.9 7 2.4 1 .3
(HULA VISTA 528900 653 177 21.1 53 29.9 6 3.4 3 1.7
(HULA VISTA 528910 895 235 26.3 40 17.0 2 .9
(HULA VISTA 528920 750 172 22.9 27 15.7 6 3.5
~ (HULA VISTA 528930 356 107 30.1 32 29.9 1 .9
~ (HULA VISTA 529000 557 224 40.2 77 34.5 7 3.1 2 .9
~
~ (HULA VISTA 529110 686 198 28.9 39 19.7 3 1.5
~ (HULA VISTA 529300 779 250 32.1 79 32.0 3 1.2 1 4
ci CHULA VISTA 529500 758 179 23.6 38 21.5 2 1.1 3 1.7
Z (HULA VISTA 529520 824 136 16.5 20 14.7 5 3.7 3 2.2
c: (HULA VISTA 529600 753 154 20.5 36 23.7 5 3.3 3 2.0
0
.0 (HULA VISTA 529700 854 112 13.1 12 10.7 3 2.7 2 1.8
;:l CO (HULA VISTA 529900 701 126 18.0 10 8.3 1 .8 8 6.7
-0 '" (HULA VISTA 530200 892 248 27.8 78 31.5
~ bO
'" '"
~ '"
\ P
B \ [
R L T \ A
E T U \ N
G 5 R \ T F
N \ 5 E 0
V C \ C 0 R
T A 0 \ 0 0 B
R 5 U \ T 5 E
5 T T \ T % [ % 5 %
(HULA VISTA 530400 538 153 28.4 40 26.1 1 .7 2 1.3
(HULA VISTA 530500 644 143 22.2 24 16.9 6 4.2 4 2.8
(HULA VISTA 530600 898 222 24.7 36 16.2 9 4.1 2 .9
(HULA VISTA 530100 890 222 24.9 36 16.4 2 .9 3 1.4
(HULA VISTA 530900 794 217 27.3 38 17 .5 16 7.4 4 1.8
(HULA VISTA 531000 1,026 194 18.9 19 10.1 3 1.6 2 1.1
(HULA VISTA 531300 640 130 20.3 10 7.8 1 .8
(HULA VISTA 531400 1,069 179 16.7 17 9.8 2 1.2 5 2.9
~ (HULA VISTA 531410 1.025 162 15.8 9 5.7 1 .6 6 3.8
(HULA VISTA 531510 772 89 11.5 11 12.4 2 2.2
~ (HULA VISTA 531100 963 210 21.8 37 18.0 2 1.0 2 1.0
I (HULA VISTA 531800 873 173 19.8 29 16.8 5 2.9 3 1.7
(HULA VISTA 531830 1,038 239 23.0 35 14.7 3 1.3 2 .8
~ (HULA VISTA 532100 751 112 14.9 15 13.5 2 1.8
(HULA VISTA 532110 887 146 16.5 15 10.5 8 5.6 3 2.1
(HULA VISTA 532200 922 154 16.1 24 15.7 9 5.9 4 2.6
(HULA VISTA 532210 707 66 9.3 4 6.1 1 1.5
(HULA VISTA 532300 825 139 16.8 12 8.8 2 1.5 6 4.4
(HULA VISTA 532310 884 186 21.0 16 8.7 8 4.3 7 3.8
(HULA VISTA 532490 772 151 19.6 41 21. 2 1 .7 2 1.3
(HULA VISTA 532500 654 154 23.5 37 24.0 1 .6
(HULA VISTA 532580 1.054 185 17 .6 21 11.4 6 3.2
(HULA VISTA 532590 734 141 19.2 17 12.1 2 1.4 1 .7
(HULA VISTA 532600 916 243 26.5 51 21.0 1 .4 2 .8
(HULA VISTA 532610 1,042 183 11.6 21 11.5 8 4.4 1 .5
(HULA VISTA 532630 804 139 11.3 18 12.9 10 7.2 1 .7
(HULA VISTA 532640 683 165 24.2 47 28.5 5 3.0
CHULA VISTA 532660 1.030 148 14.4 18 12.2 2 1.4 :D
..
CHULA VISTA 532710 236 74 31.4 18 24.7 4 5.5 1.4 ..
0
CHULA VISTA 532720 736 169 23.0 33 19.5 1 .6 ;:
CHULA VISTA 537700 670 132 19.7 30 22.7 11 8.3 3 2.3 M
(HULA VISTA 537110 428 40 9.3 9 22.5 2 5.0 o'
CHULA VISTA 538100 610 124 20.3 9 7.4 4 3.3 6 5.0 ::l
CHULA VISTA 538300 505 97 19.2 9 9.5 4 4.2 6 6.3 Z
0
(HULA VISTA 538400 801 136 17.0 9 6.7 13 9.7 6 4.5 ",'
(HULA VISTA. 538600 695 156 22.4 27 17.8 7 4.6 8 5.3 ., .
OQ .
.. .
TOTAL 57,3114 16.440 28.6 3,355 20.6 463 2.8 251 1.5 .
'" .
Tim Nader's Inaugural Speech (draft)
In a song for his newborn child, American songwriter Bob Dylan
expressed these hopes :for the next generation:
May God bless and keep you always
May your wishes all come true
May you always do for others
And let others do for you
In the next few minutes, I want to share with you some of the
things that, working together, I hope we can accomplish
achievements that will make us proud of the city we will someday
leave to our children and our children's children. However, I hope
we will always remember that the most important thing that will
make our community special will not be buildings or monuments, nor
parks or planning.
Rather, it will be the caring of many
neighbors, doing for one another. Government can and should be a
friend and partner, no.t a burden, to honest citizens - but it can
only assist, not replace, their caring efforts.
with these thoughts in mind, let me spell out the program
which I hope will someday make us proud, and our children grateful.
Few things could be more important than the protection of our
environment.
In the Environmental Agenda for the 90s that I
submi tted to the Resource Conservation commission last year, I
wrote that, II [T]he 80s were a decade of environmental destruction. II
It is my hope that we will work together to make the 1990s a decade
of environmental achievement. The Resource Conservation commission
lJ-f' - I
has completed its work on the Environmental Agenda, and this summer
this council will have the opportunity to enact a comprehensive
package to improve growth management, protect sensitive lands and
open space, reduce the ravaging effects of air pollution on our
children's health, and facilitate adequate and affordable supplies
of water for our citizens. And, Chula vista's special quality of
life does not need an international airport on our doorstep. Our
vision for our community's future features healthy air, sufficient
water, venues for the arts, a regional park in the Otay River
Valley, and a university campus - not a dumping ground for projects
no one else wants. We will insist on being partners in, not
victims of, regional decisions that determine the quality of life
that we and our children will enjoy.
No function of local government could be of higher priority
than providing for the public safety. As a citizen and a public
official, I could not be more proud of the men and women in our
police and fire departments who protect us with dedication and
skill. Their efforts, however, cannot stand alone. Up to 80% of
our crime is caused by substance abuse. The epidemic of child
abuse, numerous family breakups, learning disabilities, and lost
productivity are all in large part attributable to the easy
availability of mind-scrambling and conscience-numbing drugs. The
dollars of drug dealers are stained with the sweat of taxpayers who
must pay the costs of welfare and health care for the victims, with
the tears of families that are torn apart, and with the blood of
2
4.(' - {J
our children. Those who profit from such activity should be
treated as dangerous criminals, not as harmless entrepreneurs. As
your Mayor I will continue working with other local officials in
California to push for stronger laws to deal with the drug menace
and the epidemic of tragedy that it brings.
Public safety also requires public involvement. Let us
resolve to continue the revitalization of Neighborhood Watch,
grassroots graffiti eradication and prevention, and education
programs to alert our young people to the dangers of gangs and
drugs.
Chula vista for some time has had a high quality arts
community but has lacked a first-class venue for the public
enjoyment of cultural arts. Music, theater and visual arts help to
transform mere existence into life. Several hard-working citizens
on our city I s new Cultural Arts Commission have been laboring
diligently to create a vision for a multi-purpose, multi-cultural
Arts Center. Our undeveloped bay front would surely provide a
unique setting for such a center - one which would be a source of
community pride and enjoyment for generations to come. I
respectfully propose we should commit ourselves to transforming
such vision into reality by the end of this decade. When our
Cultural Arts Center is ready to open, I can think of no one more
appropriate to name it after than the community leader who did more
than any other elected official for the cultural arts in our city -
3
'1.f'-3
our late Mayor, Gayle McCandliss.
We must assure that our young people will be given the
economic opportunities to enj oy the environmental and cultural
accomplishments we hope to achieve, and that our city has the long-
term revenue base to mc.ke those achievements reality. I intend to
invite members of our business community, representatives of labor,
and our educational institutions to join in a new partnership for
the creation and implementation of a plan to retain and attract job
opportunities in clean business and industry for Chula Vista, while
assuring our young people will have the opportunity to compete
successfully in tomorrow's job market.
Our city has ta]{en an active role in support of social
services in our community, and rightly so. Child abuse prevention,
substance abuse recovery, adult literacy, and senior services are
important building blocks of a quality community in the 1990s.
However, no Mayor or other government official will ever have all
the answers for the social needs of our community. Rather, the
answers lie ultimately in the compassion of neighbors who do for
one another. I hope that our city government will always provide
encouragement to volunteers in the nonprofit sector, our religious
institutions and throughout our community who work to meet the
needs of their neighbors.
It would be naive not to acknowledge, at a time when a 29%
4
Iff -1
voter turnout is considered "good", that there is considerable
cynicism among many citizens today as to whether their
participation makes a difference. I have said before that there
are two kinds of government employees: public servants, and
bureaucrats.
I would hope that all of us in government would
strive hard to be true public servants, remembering that the work
we do and the decisions we make can change human lives for better
or worse.
Whether through participation in city government, or
neighborhood
planning
groups,
or
churches,
or
service
organizations, or through individual efforts, citizens of all ages
and backgrounds should take some opportunity to be involved in the
issues that affect their neighborhoods, and come closer together as
a community. It is our goal to have a city in which everyone knows
they count. It is not just government officials who can change
lives for the better. Any citizen should know that he or she can
help improve the quality of life in their neighborhood, or give new
hope to a child or dignity to a shut-in, or enrich our community's
cultural life or family values, and find allies in city Hall.
Robert Kennedy once put it this way:
Each time [one] stands up for an ideal, or acts to
improve the lot of others, he sends forth a tiny
ripple of hope, and crossing each other from a
million different centers of energy and daring
these ripple3 build a current that can sweep down
the mightiest walls...
What I am asking each of my fellow citizens to do in the
coming years is to make lots of ripples - to sweep down walls that
5
4f-5
divide us, and to build the best community we can. We may have our
differences, but if we work in mutual respect for the common good,
these differences can be strengths, enabling us to benefit from the
best that each citizen has to offer. with your support, your help
and your prayers, let us dedicate ourselves to creating the best
future we can for the next generation of our community.
Thank you, and God bless you.
6
tf-G
June 14, 1991
TO:
FROM:
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
E. R. Asmus, Assistant City Manager
~
SUBJECT:
City Council Meeting of June 18, 1991
This will transmit the agenda and related materials for the regular City Council
meeting scheduled for Tuesday, June 18, 1991. Comments regarding Written Communications
are as follows:
7a. This is a letter from Frank Tarantino, Chair of the Chula Vista 21
Committee, indicating that Lee Chapman had recently informed him that
he is resigning from the Chula Vista 21 Committee. Since this is not
an ongoing committee, there was some discussion among Committee members
whether it would be appropriate not to replace Mr. Chapman on the Committee
this far into the discussions. However, the Chula Vista 21 Committee
voted at its June 6 meeting to recommend that the City Council appoint
a replacement for Mr. Chapman.* They recommended that the City Council
consider appointing Naomi Ross as the replacement member because they
felt one of the subcommittees needs a person like Naomi Ross with a
strong interest in environmental issues. The Committee understands
it is solely the City Council that selects and appoints, but it is
the Committee's recommendation that the Council give consideration
to the appointment of Ms. Ross. IT IS STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION THAT
THE CITY COUNCIL ACCEPT MR. CHAPMAN'S RESIGNATION, THAT A LETTER OF
APPRECIATION BE SENT TO HIM, AND THAT THE COUNCIL GIVE CONSIDERATION
TO MS. ROSS' APPOINTMENT AS MR. CHAPMAN'S REPLACEMENT.
7b. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY FILED BY ERRECA'S
INC. AND BIGGS ENGINEERING BE DENIED, AND THE APPLICATION TO FILE A
LATE CLAIM BY BAYSCENE RESIDENT NEGOTIATORS BE DENIED.
ERA:mabj
*Attached is a list of ten (10) previous applicants who have not been appointed
to Chula Vista 21.
1006 Pas eo Del Paso
Chula Vista, CA 91910
June 11, 1991
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
city of Chula vista
276 4th Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Re: Appointment of Replacement Member to Chula vista 21 Committee
Lee Chapman has recently informed me that he is resigning from the
Chula vista 21 Committee, so I would suggest that the City Council
accept his resignation and send him a letter thanking him for his
participation.
At our June 6, 1991 meeting, the Chula vista 21 Committee voted to
recommend that the City Council appoint a replacement for Lee
Chapman as a member of the Chula vista 21 Committee. The Committee
also unanimously voted to recommend that the City Council appoint
Naomi Ross as the replacement. Naomi Ross had previously applied
for membership on the Chula vista 21 Committee, and her stated
interest in environmental issues would help round out the overall
membership on the Chula vista 21 Committee.
~[elY' /J
.-/ z () . /CV\~ ~a
Frank T~~tino
Chair, Chula vista 21 Committee
JT:hr
C:\TARANTIN
7Q-l
6/13/91
Boards and Commissions Applicants
Chula Vista 21
Cartagena,
Noel
Type: A
Date of Appli: 09/29/90
Misc. Info.:
Chula vista 21
Dennison, Mary K.
Type: A
Date of Appli: 01/10/91
Misc. Info.:
Chula vista 21
Edson,
-
-.
~-
Yes
-
Type: A
Date of Appli: 10/15/90
Misc. Info.:
Chula Vista 21
Fabriek, Anne
~~- -
-. .
..
.
Type: A
Date of Appli: 09/04/90
Misc. Info.:
No
Yes
No
No
Yes
No
Yes
Page
1
6/13/91
Boards and Commissions Applicants
Chula vista 21
LaBore, Harry
Yes
09/20/90
No
Page
2
6/13/91
Boards and Commissions Applicants
Chula vista 21
Thomas, Cassandra
- Yes
-. - --~-
. - No
- -. -
Type: A
Date of Appli: 09/28/90
Misc. Info. :
Chula vista 21
Yes
-~:= No
Type: A
Date of Appli: 09/21/90
Misc. Info. :
Page
3
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
Meeting Date 6/18/91
ITEM TITLE:
Claims Against the City
SUBMITTED BY:
C'&-
Director of Personnel
(4/5ths Vote: Yes
No~)
Claimant No.1:
ci ty Manager ~4tq
Erreca's, Inc.
c/o Shifflet, Walters, Kane & Konoske
Attorneys at Law
1370 W. India
San Diego, CA 92101
REVIEWED BY:
Claimant No.2:
Biggs Engineering Corporation
c/o Law Offices of William I. Chopak
3111 Camino Del Rio North, suite 1100
San Diego, CA 92108
On April 12, 1990, Ms. Adeline Miller filed a Claim against the
city for $10 million in connection with severe personal injuries she sus-
tained when she was struck by a vehicle as she crossed the street near 30th
Street and L in the City of Chula vista. The claim was denied by the City
Council on June 12, 1990 and the City is currently involved in litigation
concerning this incident.
On May 2, 1991, a Claim for equitable indemnity, contribution and/or
declaratory relief was filed against the City of Chula vista by Erreca's,
Inc., and an Amended Claim was filed on May 20, 1991 in connection with the
litigation brought by Ms. Miller. On June 11, 1991, Biggs Engineering
Corporation filed a Claim for equitable indemnity, contribution and/or
declaratory relief in connection with the same lawsuit.
Due to questionable liability, it is the recommendation of the
city's counsel, Daley & Heft, and Risk Management, that the Claims
described above be denied.
Claimant No.3:
Bayscene Resident Negotiators
Law Offices of Stanley F. Zubel
7290 Navajo Road, suite 203
San Diego, CA 92119
On May 15, 1991, an Application to File a Late Claim was filed
against the city of Chula vista by Bayscene Resident Negotiators, in con-
nection with expenses they allegedly incurred as a result of the City's
rent control ordinance which was declared unconstitutional on January 14,
1991.
Form A-113 (Rev. 11/79)
7h -)
Item
Meeting Date 6/18/91
Because the bulk of claimant's expenses were incurred more than one
year prior to the filing of the late claim application, and none of the
grounds for granting a late claim under Government Code Section 911.6 are
present, it is the recommendation of our City Attorney's Office and Risk
Management that the Application to File a Late Claim be denied.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Deny the Claim and Amended Claim of Erreca's Inc.;
2. Deny the Claim of Biggs Engineering Corporation; and
3. Deny the Application to File a Late Claim presented by
Bayscene Resident Negotiators.
J
?b-~
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item~ ~
ITEM TITLE:
Meeting Date 6/11/91
City Initiated Proposal to Amend General Plan and Zoning
Reclassification to Resolve Inconsistencies
Public Hearing: GPA-91-I/PCZ-91-C - City-initiated proposal
to amend the General Plan and rezone certain territory,
generally bounded by E Street, H Street, Second Avenue and
Third Avenue, plus an additional area east of Fourth Avenue
between wE" and Davidson Streets, to resol ve general
plan/zoning inconsistencies within the Central Chula Vista
community. The precise territorial limits, proposed
rezonings, and proposed general plan amendments are depicted
on attached Exhibits A,B,C, and D and Table I.
Resolution ~~~ Approving an Amendment to the Chula
Vista General Plan
Ordinance ,-14<1lf'i Changing the zones as described in
ExhtbJ,t$\\)~YB, C, and D and Table I, subject to conditions 'a'
lIJIQ""b"
S.~ 1trN~irector of Planning ;1!t
REVIEWED BY: City Manage~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes___No-x-)
BACKGROUND:
This item involves amending the General Plan and rezoning an area referred to
as the General Plan/Zoning Consistency Study Special Study Area B-1 in Central
Chula Vista. The study area is generally bounded by "E" Street on the north,
wW Street on the south, Second Avenue on the east, and Third Avenue on the
west. In addition, the study area includes a small area located east of
Fourth Avenue between "E" and Davidson Streets.
The study area includes approximately 50 acres and 219 lots and was divided
into three subareas to facilitate analysis and working with the community.
Part I generally incl udes the southern area located between "H" and "G"
Streets, Part II includes the central area located between "G" and "F"
Streets, and Part III includes the northern area located between "F" and "E"
Streets as well as the small area adjacent to Fourth Avenue.
On June 19, 1990 the City Council directed the Planning Department to complete
the Special Study Area B-1 of the General Plan/Zoning Consistency Study and
Action Plan for Central Chula Vista, and to return with a work program for
Special Study Areas B-2, B-3, B-4, and B-5 of the project at a later date.
lhe purpose of the Consistency Study is to resolve general plan/zoning
inconsistencies within the Central Chula Vista conununity which resulted from
( approval of the Chula Vista General Plan Update on July 11, 1989.
:aw:l S- - /
Page 2, Item J!~.
Meeting Date~
)
The area was placed in a special study category because of the complexity of
the land use issues given the existing patterns of land use, residential
density, zoning, and traffic circulation. It was anticipated that the special
study areas may require a combination of rezonings and plan amendments to
promote their orderly development and conservation. In undertaking this
study, the overall approach taken by staff was to closely review the existing
character and development patterns of each individual neighborhood, and to
recommend General Plan and zoning designations which would best preserve that
character.
Staff completed their initial analysis of Special Study Area B-1 in August
1990. Field surveys of the study area were conducted to inventory the
existing land uses within the study area. Existing zoning, lot sizes,
residential densities, and adjacent land uses were also tabulated and mapped
to assist in the analysis. Based on this research, staff initially proposed
rezoning to R-3, R-2, and R-l. Three separate community forums were held with
the affected property owners in August and September 1990 to. present staff's
preliminary recommendations and to receive input. At the community forums,
many of the property owners expressed a desire to retain some type of R-3
zoning for their property instead of the R-2 or R-l zoning recommended by
staff.
Based on input received from the property owners at the community forums and
staff's initial research, staff then further evaluated four alternative land
use recommendations and their associated impacts. Staffs' alternatives
analysis evaluated the development potential in terms of the number of
additional lots permitted and the number of nonconforming lots resulting from
each of the alternatives. The potential impacts of each alternative were then
considered in the context of the existing development patterns within and
adjacent to the study area. In addition, concerns raised by the Chula Vista
School District about impacts resulting from additional development within the
study area were considered. Staff's revised recommendation which is before
the City Council in this report for the Special Study Area B-1 was presented
at a final community forum with the property owners on February 7th.
The Environmental Review Coordinator conducted an Initial Study, IS-91-13, of
potential environmental impacts associated with the implementation of the
proposed rezonings and General Plan amendments. Based on the attached Initial
Study and comments thereon, the Coordinator has concluded that this
reclassification would cause no significant environmental impacts as per the
Negative Declaration issued on IS-91-13.
RECOMMENDATION:
1. Based on the Initial Study and comments on the Initial Study and Negative
Declaration, find that the proposed rezonings and General Plan amendments
will have no significant environmental. impacts and adopt the Negative
Declaration issued on IS-91-13 for the General Plan/Zoning Consistency
Study.
2. Adopt a resolution to change the General Plan as described on the
attached Exhibits A, B, C, and D and Table I.
)
~~-.;z
Page 3, Item 12.-
Meeting Date 6/11/91
3. Adopt an ordinance to change the zones as described on the attached
Exhibits A, B, C, and D and Table I subject to the following conditions:
(a) The City of Chula Vista shall enforce any appropriate legal
mechanism sponsored by the Chula Vista School District and the
Sweetwater Union High School District to mitigate impacts on school
facilities.
(b) All existing nonconforming uses created as a result of this action
shall be allowed to be reconstructed in the event of destruction of
greater than 60% of the property's improvements upon review and
approval of the Planning Commission.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: The Planning Commission held a public
hearing on this matter on March 31, 1991, and then continued the hearing to
April 10, 1991. On April 10, 1991, the Planning Commission recommended
approval as stated herein by a vote of 6-0-1 (Commissioner Martin abstained).
A total of four property owners spoke "for" the rezone and eight "against."
The Resource Conservation Commission considered the Negative Declaration on
January 9, 1991 and took no action.
DISCUSSION:
1. Adiacent zonina and land use. (See Table II for Glossary of Zoning
Categories)
Primary area between Second and Third:
North CC,CCP,CO, Commercial, single family and
R-I, R-3 multi family residential
East R-I Single family residential
South R-I Single family residential
West CO, CC, CB, Commercial and multi family
R-3 residential
Area east of Fourth Avenue:
North
East
CT
R-3
Commercial
South
CO
R-I
Multi-family and single family
family residential
Park, library, civic center
Single family residential
West
cJ-J~ ~-3
Page 4, Item~
Meeting Date 6/11/91
)
2. Existing site characteristics.
The entire study area is zoned R-3 except for the small, isolated area
located adjacent to Fourth Avenue between "E" and Davidson Streets which
is zoned CoO and CoO-Po
[HISTORICAL NOTE: The Central Chu1a Vista District (Special
Study B-1) has been historically zoned R-3 (multiple family),
approximately since the late 1940's and early 1950's per Zoning
Ordinance 398 adopted by City Council, March 22, 1949.]
The study area is developed with a diverse mixture of single family and
multi family residences including:
a. single family homes on one lot;
b. duplexes;
C. lots originally developed with single family units which now include
an additional one to three units through garage conversions, or the
construction of additional detached or attached units;
d. larger multi-family apartment or condominium developments.
Because of the diversity of density and products types occurs throughout
the study area, the study area is very non-homogenous. Although the
study area does not consist of a well-defined single family or multi
family neighborhood, there are subareas within the study area which have
a somewhat consistent character.
The isolated portion of the study area located adjacent to Fourth Avenue
between "E" and Davidson Streets includes 8 parcels developed with
duplexes, multi family residences, and offices. This area is zoned CoO
and C-O-P, and is designated as High Density Residential (18 to 27 du/ac)
on the General Plan.
3. General Plan
The majority of the study area is designated as low-Medium Density
Residential (3 to 6 du/ac) except for the southern portion which is
designated as Medium-High Density Residential (6 to 11 du/ac), a small
area located east of Church Avenue between "G" Street and Alvarado Street
which is also designated as High Density Residential, and the area
adjacent to Fourth Avenue which is designated as High Density Residential
(18-27 du/ac).
ANALYSIS
The analysis provided below is divided into subareas based on the different
zoning and General Plan amendment reconunendations proposed by staff. The )
~~-'1
Page 5, Item 1. t,
Meeting Date 6/11/91
specific location of each subarea is illustrated in Exhibits A, B, C, and D
and the existing and proposed General Plan designations and zoning for all of
the subareas is summarized in Table I. Table III provides an overall
comparison of the number of additional units which could be built in this
study area under the recommended zoning, compared to existing zoning. .
1. Part 1 - Subarea 1A.
Existing General Plan:
Proposed General Plan:
Existing Zoning:
Proposed Zoning:
Low-Medium Residential
Medium-High Residential
R-3
R-3-P-22
This subarea includes 17 lots of which 7 include single family
residences, 1 lot includes 2 separate single family residences, and 9
include multi-family residences. The lots north of "G" Street are 6,135
square feet while the lots south of G Street range between 10,000 and
16,000 square feet in size with one 1.17 acre lot. Densities on existing
multi-family lots range from 13 to 43 dulac with an average density of 26
du/ac.
Under the existing R-3 zoning, there are 5 nonconforming lots and an
additional 38 units could be developed within this subarea. Under the
proposed R-3-P-22 zoning, there would be 5 nonconforming lots (no change)
and an additional 26 units could be developed.
The zone reclassification from R-3 to R-3-P22 (22 du/ac) would ~110w for
multifamily development but at a density which is lower than what is
allowed under the current R-3 zoning. The R-3-P22 density is compatible
with the overall character of the area which includes both sing1e family
and multi family residences. It provides for design review in accordance
with the .P" Precise Plan Modifying District guidelines. llnder the
R-3-P22 zone, development of three units is allowed on a 6,ODJ square
foot lot which is the predominant lot size within this subarea.
The proposed R-3-P22 zone and Medium-High Density Residential General
Plan designation provide a good transition within the study area between
the single family residential area located east of Second Avenui and the
downtown redevelopment area located to the west.
2. Part 1 - Subarea lB. (Exhibit Al
Existing General Plan:
Proposed General Plan:
Existing Zoning:
Proposed Zoning:
Low-Medium Residential
Medium-High Residential
R-3
R-3-P-14
(
This subarea includes 19 lots of which 6 include single family
residences, 4 are lots with two single family residences, one is a
duplex, and 8 include multi-family residences. Most lots are 7,000
~-5
Page 6, Item 1.2-
Meeting Date 6/11/91
square feet while 5 lots range in size from 7,700 to 9800 square feet.
The average density on existing multi-family lots is 22 du/ac.
Under the existing R-3 zoning, there is 1 nonconforming lot and an
additional 30 units could be developed within this subarea. Under the
proposed R-3-P-l4 zoning, there would be 8 nonconforming lots and an
additional 6 units could be developed.
There are several factors which support the proposed rezoning to R-3-P-l4:
a. It allows for additional development at a density that is compatible
with the existing character of the area which includes a mixture of
approximately half single family lots with one or two units per lots
and half multi family lots.
b. It provides a transition between the high dens.ity residential
deve 1 opment located to the north and south, commerc i a 1 development
to the west, and proposed R-l zoning to the east, and existing
single family development immediately east of the study area.
c. It provides more flexibility in parking and building requirements,
and is better suited for lots already developed with one dwelling
unit than the R-2 zone.
3. Part 1 - Subarea 2. (Exhibit Al
Existing General Plan:
Proposed General Plan:
Existing Zoning:
Proposed Zoning:
Low-Medium Residential
High Residential
R-3
R-3
This subarea includes 6 lots all of which are developed with multi-family
residences. Four lots are 7,000 square feet in size with the remaining 2
lots being approximately 30,000 and 60,000 square feet. Densities range
from 25 to 74 dulac with the average density being 38 du/ac. This
subarea is located adjacent to the commercial development along Third
Avenue.
All of the lots are nonconforming under the existing R-3 zoning since the
existing densities exceed the density allowed by the R-3 zone.
Consequently, staff is recommending retaining the existing R-3 zoning in
this subarea and amending the General Plan from low-medium to high
density residential to be consistent with the existing zoning and
development in the subarea.
4. Part 1 - Subarea 3. (Exhibit Al
Existing General Plan:
Proposed General Plan:
Existing Zoning:
Proposed Zoning:
Low-Medium Residential
Low-Medium Residential
R-3
R-l
.2t;. s.-"
Page 7, Item 1.1,
Meeting Date 6/11/91
This subarea includes 24 lots, of which 19 are developed with single
family residences, 2 are developed with 2 single family residences on one
lot, 1 is developed with a multi-family residence, 1 is vacant, and 1 is
a church parking lot. Seventeen lots are between 6,000 to 7,000 square
feet in size. Six lots are between 7,700 and 12,600 square feet in size,
and the church parking lot is 51,150 square feet in size. The average
density is 6 du/ac except for 3 lots with densities of 11 to 18 du/ac.
This subarea is located adjacent to the existing single family
neighborhood extending easterly from Second Avenue.
Under the existing R-3 zoning, there are no nonconforming lots and an
additional S2 units could be developed within this subarea. Under the
proposed R-1 zoning, there would be 5 nonconforming lots and only one
additional unit could be developed. No residential development of the
church parking lot is assumed.
Staff is reconvnending rezoning this area to R-1 to ret'ain the existing
single family development character of this subarea. In addition, there
1s a lack of sufficient on-street parking to support development of an
additional 52 units within this subarea. This is the only subarea within
the entire study area which is single family in character and where staff
is reconvnending retaining the existing low-Medium Density Residential
General Plan designation.
S. Part 1 - Subarea 4. (Exhibit Al
Existing General Plan:
Proposed General Plan:
Existing Zoning:
Proposed Zoning:
Medium-High Residential
High Residential
R-3
R-3
This subarea includes 18 residential lots all of which are developed with
multi-family residences except for 1 lot which is developed with a single
family residence. In addition, the northwestern portion of the subarea
is developed with the St. Rose of Lima church, school, and convent.
lot sizes range from 11,000 to 66,200 square feet. The predominant lot
size for the area south of H Street is 21,759 square feet. Most of the
lots located north of H Street are between 21,800 and 31,500 in size.
Densities range from 9 to 64 du/ac with the average density being 28
du/ac. This subarea is characterized by high density large apartment
buildings located along H Street.
Under the existing R-3 zoning, there are 5 nonconforming lots and an
additional 68 dwelling units could be developed. Because this area is
characterized by high density residential development, staff is
recommending retaining the existing R-3 zoning in this subarea and
amending the General Plan from low-medium to high density residential to
be consistent with the zoning and development pattern. Development of
additional units in conformance with the R-3 zone would be consistent
with the existing high density character of the area.
:J.st;4'1 ~ -?
Page 8, Item 1.z.
Meeting Date 6/11/91
6. Part 2. (Exhibit B)
Existing General Plan:
Proposed General Plan:
Existing Zoning:
Proposed Zoning:
low-Medium Residential
Medium-High Residential
R-3
R-3-P-14
This subarea includes 59 lots of which 35 include single family
residences, 2 are lots with two single family residences, 5 are duplexes,
and 17 include multi-family residences. Most of the lots (34 lots) are
between 6,100 and 6,750 square feet in size, with 13 lots being less than
6,000 in size and 12 lots being greater than 6,750 square feet in size.
Approximately two-thirds of the lots are developed with single family
residences and duplexes with the remaining one-third developed with multi
family residences. The average density for this subarea is II du/ac.
Under the existing R-3 zoning, there are 8 nonconforming lots and an
additional 76 units could be developed within this subarea. Under the
proposed R-3-P-14 zoning, there would be 17 nonconforming lots and an
additional 28 units could be developed. For the R-3-P-14 zone, it was
assumed that a minimum lot size of 6,222 square feet is required to
qual ify for development of two dwell ing units on a lot. Consequently,
lot consolidation would be required to achieve a density increase on lots
consisting of less than 6,222 square feet.
The R-3-P-14 zoning allows for additional development at a density that
is compatible with the existing character of the area which is
predominantly single family and duplex units. In addition, the R-3-P-14
zone provides more flexibility in parking and building requirements, and
is better suited for lots already developed with one dwelling unit than
the R-2 zone.
I. Part 3 - Subarea 1. (Exhibit C)
Existing General Plan:
Proposed General Plan:
Existing Zoning:
Proposed Zoning:
low-Medium Residential
Medium-High Residential
R-3
R-3-P-22
This subarea includes 68 lots of which 26 include single family
residences, 5 are lots with two single family residences, 6 are duplexes,
30 include multi-family residences, and one is a parking lot. Most of
the lots (40 lots) are between 6,000 and 7,000 square feet in size, with
18 lots being less than 6,000 in size and 10 lots being greater than
7,000 square feet in size. Approximately half of the lots are developed
with single family residences and duplexes, and half are developed with
multi family residences.
Under the existing R-3 zoning, there are 10 nonconforming lots and an
additional 106 units could be developed within this subarea. Under the )
~~~
Page 9, Item 12
Meeting Date 6/11/91
proposed R-3-P-22 zoning, there would be 13 nonconforming lots and an
additional 74 units could be deve~oped.
The zone reclassification from R-3 to R-3-P22 (22 du/ac) would allow for
multifamily development but at a density which is lower than what is
allowed under the current zoning. The R-3-P22 density is considered to
be compatible with diverse character of the area which includes
approximately half single family and duplex units, and half multifamily
residences and provides for design review in accordance with the "P"
Precise Plan Modifying District guidelines. Under the R-3-P22 zone,
development of three units is allowed on a 6,000 to 7,000 square foot lot
which is the predominant lot size in this subarea.
8. Part 3 - Subarea 2. (Exhibit Dl
Existing General Plan:
Proposed General Plan:
Existing Zoning:
Proposed Zoning:
High Residential
Professional & Administrative Commercial
C-O & C-O-P
C-O-P
This subarea includes 8 lots of which 2 lots are developed with offices
and parking, 4 lots are developed with duplexes at a density of 13 dulac,
and 2 lots are developed with multi-family residences at an average
density of 26 du/ac. The average lot size is 9,000 square feet.
The proposed recommendation would retain the existing C-O commercial
zoning of this area but would add the "P" Precise Plan Modifying District
to provide development guidelines to ensure high quality design that will
be compatible with residences to the east and west. The commercial
designation for this area is more appropriate than the existing High
Density Residential General Plan designation given that this area is
adjacent to the commercial corridor along "E" Street to north and to the
south along Fourth Avenue, there are high traffic volumes along Fourth
Avenue, and a portion of the area is currently developed with commercial
office uses.
FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable.
WPC 9325P
/
~., ~-7
Page 10, Item~
Meeting Date 6/11/91
TABLE I
EXISTING AND PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS AND ZONING
...............................................................................
Existing
General Plan
Part 1:
Area 1A
Area 18
Area 2
Area 3
Area 4
Low-Medium
Low-Medium
Low-Medium
Low-Medium
Medium-High
Low-Medium
Part 2:
Part 3:
Area 1
Area 2
Low-Medium
High
Proposed
General Plan
Existing
Zonina
Medium-High
Medium-High
High
Low-Medium
High
Medium-High
R-3
R-3
R-3
R-3 . .
R-3
R-3
Medium-High
Professional
& Administrative
Commerc i a 1
R-3
CoO &
C-O-P
Low-Medium Density Residential
Medium-High Density Residential
High Density Residential
WPC 9325P
- 3-6 du/ac
- 11-18 du/ac
- 18-27 du/ac
"7i.l~ ~-/d
Proposed
Zonina
R-3-P-22
R-3-P-14
R-3
R-1
R-3
R-3-P-14
R-3-P-22
C-O-P
TABLE II
ZONING DESCRIPTIONS
R-t SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE: Permits single family dwellings, accessory
uses, and certain conditional uses.
R-2 ONE AND TWO-FAMILY RESIDENCE ZONE:
duplexes, and attached single family
conditional uses similar to R-I lone.
Permits single family dwellings,
dwe 11 i ngs. Accessory uses and
R-3 APARTMENT RESIDENTIAL ZONE: Permits multiple dwellings, townhouses and
duplexes, and accessory uses. Single family homes and other designated uses
permitted with a conditional use permit. 32 units per acre maximum density.
R-3-P-14 APARTMENT RESIDENTIAL ZONE WITH PRECISE PLAN MODIFYING DISTRICT. 14
UNITS PER ACRE: Allows uses permitted in the R-3 lone. New development
subject to Precise Plan applications il)cluding Design Review. 14 units per
acre maximum density.
R-3-P-22 APARTMENT RESIDENTIAL ZONE WITH PRECISE PLAN MODIFYING DISTRICT. 22
UNITS PER ACRE: Allows uses permitted in the R-3 lone. New development
subject to Precise Plan applications, including Design Review. 22 units per
acre maximum density.
CO ADMINISTRATIVE AND PROFESSIONAL OFFICE ZONE: Permits offices for
professions, administrative, financial institutions, prescription pharmacies,
and other offices of the same character. Accessory uses such as services and
sales for occupants and patrons are permitted, as well as designated
conditional uses.
COP ADMINISTRATIVE AND PROFESSIONAL OFFICE ZONE WITH PRECISE PLAN MODIFYING
DISTRICT: Allows uses permitted in the CO lone. New development subject to
Precise Plan applications, including Design Review.
WPC 9400P
i
~Y-II
TABLE ill
Summary of the number of additional units which can be built under existing zoning versus
proposed zoning, within each subarea, with totals for the entire B-1 area.
Existing No. of Proposed No. of
Zoning Additional Zoning Additional
Units Units
PART 1:
Area lA R-3 38 R-3-P-22 26
Area IB R-3 30 R-3-P-14 6
Area 2 R-3 0 R-3 0
Area 3 R-3 52 R-l 1
Area 4 R-3 68 R-3 68
SUB-TOTAL 188 101
PART 2: R-3 76 R-3-P-14 49
SUB-TOTAL 76 49
PART 3:
Area 1 R-3 106 R-3-P-22 74
Area 2 CoO & C-Q-P N/A C-Q-P N/A
SUB-TOTAL 106 74
TOTAL 370 224
(1'..... UI)
a <;--/.(
, I
- -
. '. .'.:': \ I too: I .: .:........... "l. .c:
, ... '/..'~
p~ W~VU' . i I.i.- .'. . .>. '.>'/ h I
. ..-:
I' I. I c :-.-~ I : '~K
". . . ;. t f
G
_,I n
tJ
I !
MADRONA
-. .... ;
,
: ,
,
.
!
i
. -,
-- - j~t -- -
~ " .l~c--
. , 1 I
: . t--- 'I
' ii, .
. ~_---~I: . I
t. ~
"
e..: ~e_.:
, I
. .... i ~
. . .. ~ .
...J L.
'r'"
.
. -.. -
. .
_ i l"
, ,~1
c-~,
i I
I
I
! I
-
,
. " /
'0, '-J'-
'T T'
-sua~ 3
~E
- ....---
0,
SUBA
ROOSEVELT ST
'--
.' !
SUBAREA 18
ALV RAOO
.. - - - . - --
.__ __ _ -4 _
---~
,,_....
I
e_ __-I
.
I
j
-
.
...... . .
i
i
'-
j
I
.- ~-.
SUBAREA 4
.. -, 'I
t
,
~--"----
l.___._
~ - e . _
I
.
.. .... - ~
J~....
H S~I
,
.
f---
.
.
,
j
1
. .
,
1.__ _____'
.
.......
,
r"''''' -. ~..
~ ,-. .
L.._~
'--HI
:::~
u.v /-
.
.
r" .
,. I
' .
J ; i
SHASTA
r ': l I .
: J . J I I, I i ~ I
, . ) . I , .
S'TFu=1
~L~\'if-\j~'~:' ;
~ r---. 4 ;---.
. '<i. . ' ,
GENERAL PLAN/ZONING CONSISTENCY
-, STUDY - SPECIAL STUDY AREA Bl
PART I
N
~
EXHIBIT
A
SCAlJ!: I.. 3DO'
LE1'J lERI-McIN'lYRE AND ASSOCIATES
,.
.-
- . "__ . __ . - _n _"~__'_.__'."_ _.... _____"" ._.__. .- - _ .-_....._... .
- J' I f H .
, i ---.;
i i
\ I ... I
,
, - --
, I I
,
---~
I I
F 8TFu:c1
1 t :~N~~~~ I : : :: , .u_
t ,.PA~ ~ .:- ~ ~... j~
j · . ~'....~ 1'~ ~ ~ - - m
! ~ i. ~ ~ ~~-~',~ - -. ~ - - c
.. .
CENTER ! ~~ :_ _._ j CI) _ __
t .J. i ~ _7 -1 ~ -- - ~- - - i g - - -
. 1 J r - - - -, - - - .... --
I~:' -,1 I--------~!l----
I .... -- - . I .
J I'.,
Ed. I CYPRESS Slt=::1
- - .. t. "
. . .
'I r--- -.
.. -, I
" I I- . - . . . .
~ L__..--;-_~_h:-:~';- .
. . I I
- i
-- c
- - ~
-.-j
I
--~
--1
--,
f
.. .-
: -I
: oi
MADRONA
8TFa:1:1
..
,
.
~
I I
I. 'j
I I
i I
I j
t II
G Slt=::1
GENERAL PLAN/ZONING CONSISTENCY
STUDY - SPECIAL STUDY AREA 81
PART II
LEhlERI-McIN'IYRE AND ASSOCIATES
f
I
'I
I
. ,
- -. I
I ,
N
..
EXHIBIT
8
)
lIC\U!: I'. JllO'
. ~-
"/1
. I
I
I I
~ j r-
, i f
r- - -.... ,
: I r
.
,
E
I .
i
i ! ,
I .
I i I
i~---
>- - - --~
, . -'
' .---- ~-
- - -- - --1
.. - - ... -
- - - _0 ~ ~ j
,
: I ... - - - ~ ,'j
, -- --I SUBAREA 1 - - '0 ,
I I
&. - - .. r - - -.. I . (
- .
, . ~
.
. DAVDSON S~t- ....
! : ~ - - --~ I --j
.
I - ... .0"
. , I
,
. I I
i . I
i .
i Ie/)
I~ I~ I
I I
~; '!, - - - .
-
.
I I J I I I
: I
. I I I'
. - i f :
.
. ! , I ! I
,
SlI1t= I
, ,
l -- _ ~
,
'-----,
r---~-.
t - -- -- -;
il,
I j
< I!'
---' i
. <
r---
.
f::~
l':__~
I .
l~
1 t
~~
LANSeI.. y WAY
,
, I :
~ 1 ~
I I ;
I I!'
I~i
!
I
I
MONTEBELlO
___.i I
: ,
I
.
i
I
U
---.
I
,
---1
F \ tJ II'II:t: I
I '~'I
I
, .... - '.. '-" 1
~.,.. . ...
1.
I
, "
N
'.
GENERAL PLAN/ZONING CONSISTENCY
STUDY - SPECIAL STUDY AREA 81
PART III - SUBAREA 1
EXHIBIT
C
ICI\U!; t'. JllO'
, , LEnu;RI-MclN'lYRE AND ASSOCIATES
"
. "~~""'-,----,-...-,-~,,,...,,....._.__...,.,'--"~'--' -
- ----
-'-
------:;---;----- - -..-
,
r I~
I.. -
, .
.
I
I
- -1
.E
Ii
e
I
i
-.
I
i
- . '.'1 I
)
\
!
SIItt:I
f
I
I
~
,
, j
1il=
er-
-~ ~
. I .
I ~. I 1----
-:--J 'SleAREA2 i ~b r~::
... .-.J i---
IL__
I I
i I
STREET! e II I f .- )
1 rL'6R~R~--(-p~~'~-ll- _i_-
I, j ,; ~ ." o. . . . , : ,..' ' 'i
. , ,..... . . ,
I t':_~. ,;"-. i:- ~..:, \-:.:.... ',r t'-
;' ~;'~' ,. .:-" ~~...,.:...,;~ :'.r
.
I
r
I
II Ii
c
--t
.
. I
.C
'>
~~~t
! I
--.-- -; r-
; r
Ir-
I
DAVDSON
~
d
f
r-\Jtc
1".., ;J !
C!:' "I -:- E -
....~'t; ;-(
CHULA VISTA
PU8}_IC LIBRARY
l .
IF. sl
GENERAL PLAN/ZONING CONSISTENCY
STUDY - SPECIAL STUDY AREA Bl
PART III - SUBAREA 2
N
-
EXHIBIT
. D
).
SCAU!: ... 3lIlI'
LE'lTlt;RI-McIN1YRE AND ASSOCIATES
!'~I
,
. IL- I
~!lA
-
., - -:-:;
.,1
..
.
,.-
-
-
=
.-J
CIVICP
CUlTl
IS]
~,
lit. i!
E'S~;r...
f- .~!
~
i
NtH !lA, -t-- j
t I
-
'I Ed 1.J".t:F.Nn
.l.~ : II :! I .~.: LIN DR W,.,... DoIoiIy
""'~ t:.. . .: ....' (u.../..)
_ ~ NDR .....O""D ., ,.1
_. - . r (~1l"/",)
.- - - 1 - - NtH DR .....1HiP DaoiIy
- ,.- '- ~ · .. '., (11'lIdo/..)
~ H DR =Do.iry D .. "_,
.. .. > > ,..' . ~ %7"'/..)
., .. c ..~... C'" RC "oi.II
:: ::', - 1-1f@:L..,.....,.POPPIbIi<IOlIOuIihblic
.. H1ftft .. . '..1 : PAC - ...;....,.,~............
ILf" ~ r----a.J
.. ~ ~1OlI~(: r-
I I" I . ::::: '~~~
= ~ -.. IJ " L'::: . r:::
- li-f- - = :::~~ff.
MI ~ . , . I I ,i' 1 mj: I ~f"l gr, , ,
__ i'-- , .
_It .Oll.....'.~ - r- --:.: Ll". IT""'; LL
: Io"~i "';:';;';' :: .: ::, j :-r-;.~~
! PR. .'.:..:..' ... ,-- ~'= ~
H:Ii DB.l ..... .:~ i V' , " r'"
w.. ",It:: I;: ::<::: ..::... : I ; !, ..
Z= r- I'" .. ~: I.. i ; I I It-!. - r-
... ::: '-= ~ T . " [. ~ . -= ~
-s::::' I' I I _~.-f-
! '?)?: t: :P;ART: I . : 1 'i , ':i~:- r-
,~ <./~ '''''II '111: i i i ; ill I =<s:::; 1-.
L'~~ ~'i'i"~ ":' ','. :":,: Jr"
.. ':. ...~i!. ;;. ';':'I~.::~r3.-~', .
. "c.:.. ~'1"" ....:AL r
n' ~H' 11 i i Iljr-/,~'//' 'o,
t I~ "~~"""l, . "'.,
,! . ... >---i :.,$.<- .....
Il:,; - i _1' _l':,
I::; :::::::. "~'. !~
. ... .. u'- f--. -; - i
,__ ., ....~...~ f-={;.,. ,
I. " ... .......... -? -, I' ,
...... ':, . - .
.1 ...J '1---
I
~: ..'
:~.-: ....
t= ~ :-
:.: -:
- :~
, I. ... "
I'" .., ."
. ...
. .. ~!.-
nW....'iA'iit..
~ '''''ro. .J"(>r"
In.'..'.....J/'
r-:--.;.... "-.. .. . .....
tMULA VIllA
PUBLIC LlIiRAItY ~
.;'....
-I"',~'-
I. ,-
Ii ,...,..
: .~-;-.;-.. ~IC'
. - . .....' ",-.
.'
1 "'1 ~
-J _
I
1
~tRiM~DR
"t . '-.
". ,
HDR
,-. RG-
,
)
. -
1_
': :;;~:5.:.~~E!;. \; . .: PA.~~. /.>~
EmIill. '. ..-- I' . . ,
. .,. ..:'. i:.' :
tTI1T----
( 'I . , ,I I!" '. II i
~~~ .:~; I i I .. I I l :; l . ! ;
).- ''-, ""ll
: r=:: ~-'-~J . I
. _<i__.
..:;-:- --
PQP :=
=::1 t ;>R: ;~-- __
f :7" JIC, "III! :!~lol" ,: I .'
- ~ .~ ill: r-=~,.I~.
I L I, ~~rl ~.....
:! I' i==l=_...=: ftAC ~
FR.r-r H -- r", I r. iT ,
-I-- Ig~~=:J _ I, ..', ,', I I r I
GENERAL PLAN/ZONING CONSISTENCY
STUDY - SPECIAL STUDY AREA Bl
J-~. SURROUNDING GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS
! I I ,
: f ,; I
,
P-' :1
~-
:.'.~~ ' ~'=i" . .
...- ...L r"'"'\. : :
... - ---f y'"
... - -r--\ .' j... It I :
'~'_ .. - I. .,.._~ +-'
'I I I .I I 'i I on -:1" '. . ',r.,.' "
.
. '
. ,
I .......... :
N
~
EXHIBIT
E
SCALE: t.. fJ11
L},;TllERI.McIN1YRE AND ASSOCIATES
<iI-/7.
....D ...~
._----
_ I --~, :-{1 H-
R2P, Fro;' ". - R2P\', '-
"'-. ~--'I \\
'E"~'-
) I I RJP j ~
ILS ....
j r --."
'-,...
j - -;=;j. j~
j A";'-=" .:;. I~..
I --I.,.. ~ j ;.~ ,>,
. ~ . J., - ,-I . i<
- ~ .. j~' l ! ~ I
, ..,1 J<<.! . "
I - I~.'" -; I ". '1,__
.' I ...,' '1 ! 1~1. '2;
. .,...jd __lZ' _: ,_,
,..... .... ;~.. .,~.
1-'-1 -H 'il..:....
; I;.~."" '---' ,,- .; : . -j"')
i ~'Eu~' , ,- '-'
t . ........, . "_ /
'1' I:R-1 .- --... ) r
, I ! :
=-- .,_tl-
M";" t..., It.......:;._.. ~I '~I" ;r-
I -' , . C, B f~ R ~ Ii..... .~. ! i i:. . /' ~\ .
:__ j. ...', I.:' fl. 1&IJ~ _~~..h!.( ~-.-1l-~
: "" .! ''''T'" 1.:1 "=1 . - . __ '...ij il4
R J " I: ~ t '.: I. iZj' ';", -_.;~--
,.coo HP , ~r,;- ,cq, If-': . i!~ . :~ 1. ..,! i
..., I Zi --!~.._~ J. fl ~tCl 1r .___h~1
.. !. ,",.Il"'- i:-.l R.3 'I ...-.;;r::.s;' -'; .._J f'
>, :.,..::Z:. --' :!'F-cESS
~il"i.... ",1 ~:!' 'I ;.r"""\;- 11
"'E"OR-AL PARk II r- ,::" t~~:]i".:::i;' PART. j :-:~; :-~:
. ,~,,--... . , :J.ZO.'-I
,,;'01... ,_=" ~ [~ 2- on,' r'l. P\i "':'..;...::...r~,l:.: ...Ji! . ~--
;- -- : ; lr::-o;5(t' ~ ; ~ _i :i~::.-:t:
::j![:::; .... . L-
!, I I .
1'1 R.3..
.. ',' 1,~1 ~,' --, ....
'~ --'. .'
L. - rt- f ~j= " ~ifd j .... .
. "": . . ,. ,. i ,-". ,j 1- I .. ~.. - ," R-1=(:==" .~
: :,; -'~ r,] i'.' '.. . ==-..:i~L-~'J~ ..'
J -='- ! !~O ,--I t- -- "------. . . ~4=-:c",;;~ ~
:01-1 COP i ~ 1 it" PART I ".. ~'~~ ~l"-
....
I ~ i::';r~'IEQi '~.~ .. I,. "'P I ., j-- .-. '--'
I~ ~r--.:j I -- ,,,..,. ....---. .. ~- .:.:: ':::-'~ ---
LU.... - ...- ~~Ib: ~ -
'.R'~1'; l' 1 '-. , -::::~C_ C C . I " =-, -if ::::-.... \./' /""":~~, ~,
. -,J;;,;; -j---=~'-;-i~t=-; ill .;... 1~-1; ATr-'l::q '. .//'L.,;:!~/:'~
\
'.
..1 "_ .-'.;;' '&.... ..,,1' CTP, .,s -.....--, (
R.3 - I! ~ ~~ I i CC tC'pICO -~r1
j I ' j '-''';-: 1-- i r "n I
'. .. ,- ; I - ~ ~~I :~i ~
:-):= =:- ~!.]t3J !.:' . ~p .~ it.. '..,..J;,~;F~=~ 1-.-p,''',f';~MT'!; .'f!.;:.,
~. t~i __.1 :=: ~i --';:.~.~ . ;", ":'1.'- .- ,
== ~ --~ 'm ",CO'P, J.. .,
.._- - , L-,;" -. !! . I I __
P.I'R,' 1l-tyf. ~AIIK. C':l ~' t.-: ..tp, 1.1 '
0, :COF' r: .:::j r-_ I .. 1 -
:,"'C ~ .- I!- ---1 ;-"::' i-=- FO~, I-~ J L_::' 1
:ENTE~ : .-'';..A \"J:'1A b: ~ ,'-1'= I i31=--"'~ i _-=
I :',.e..A' i.-'eo,."" ! , ft-. l~,
-: ! ! . .-. ';'["
. i I _ _.. __c: I:
-
.~ .
, !
.
,
CC
~
-
>;
.4'i
, .
. _.~
~~
L~~_:':"-I.'~,~C: :,' ._-
.' ._....:f" r.,.
.~. '
'-". .,..-
I- i
i
.. "--.._-
COP
ER.6~ i
OS, j
GENERAL PLAN/ZONING CONSISTENCY
STUDY - SPECIAL STUDY AREA Bl
SURROUNDING ZONING
N
~
EXHIBIT
F
)
SCALE: 1-. 6001
LEnU;RI-MclN1YRE AND ASSOCIATES
~-~
SEe',': ".
vnc
i'"::'/ :-, ~,,:'
\<-..nWA.\LJ
;:.\r"D' >.
hDvl' nUl;
ORDINANCE NO. 2462
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA REZONING CERTAIN
TERRITORY WITHIN THE CENTRAL CHULA VISTA COMMUNITY 1
GENERALLY BOUNDED BY E STREET, H STREET, SECOND AVENUE
AND THIRD AVENUE, PLUS AN ADDITIONAL AREA EAST OF FOURTH
AVENUE BETWEEN "E" AND DAVIDSON STREETS, TO GENERALLY
REDUCE THE EXISTING PERMITTED DENSITIES FROM R-3 TO
LESSER DENSITIES, AS DEPICTED ON EXHIBITS A, B, C, AND D
ATTACHED HERETO.
WHEREAS, the Council has studied the feasibility and propriety
of replanning and rezoning an area referred to as the General
Plan/Zoning Consistency Study Special Study Area B-1 in Central
Chula vista which is generally bounded by "E" Street on the north,
"H" Street on the south, Second Avenue on the east, and Third
Avenue on the west and, in addition, includes a small area located
east of Fourth Avenue between "E" and Davidson Streets, and
described in Exhibit E, attached hereto, as Parts 1 through 3,
inclusive ("Study Area"); and
WHEREAS, said study area includes approximately 50 acres and
219 lots and was divided into three subareas to facilitate analysis
and working with the community; Part I generally includes the
southern area located between "H" and "G" Streets, which area is
represented in the map attached hereto as Exhibit A by the darkened
lines and the "subarea" designations; Part II includes the central
area located between "G" and "F" Streets, which area is represented
in the map attached hereto as Exhibit B. by the containment within
the darkened lines demonstrated thereon; and Part III includes the
northern area located between "F" and "E" Streets, which area is
represented in the map attached hereto as Exhibit C as Subarea 1,
as well as the small area adjacent to Fourth Avenue, which area is
represented in the map attached hereto as Exhibit D as Subarea 2;
and
WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator conducted an
Initial Study, IS-91-13, of potential environmental impacts
associated with the implementation of the proposed rezonings and
General Plan amendments and based on the Initial Study and comments
thereon, the Coordinator has concluded that this reclassification
would cause no significant environmental impacts as per the
Negative Declaration issued on IS-91-13; and,
WHEREAS, on April la, 1991, the Planning commission recom-
mended approval by a vote of 6-0-1 (Commissioner Martin abstained)
of the revisions to the Land Use and Land Use Diagram of the Land
Use Element of the General Plan provided for in Council Resolution
No. 16199 and of the rezoning of said Study Area in the manner
herein provided; and,
1
8-/
WHEREAS, at the Council Meetings at which this Ordinance was
introduced, the City Council adopted Resolution No.
amending the General Plan to permit increased planning densities in
the manner therein provided ("General Plan Amendment"); and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the reductions
in densities permitted by this rezoning is consistent with the
increased densities permitted by the General Plan Amendment; and,
Now, therefore, the City Council of the city of Chula vista
does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. Rezoning.
That the study Area is hereby rezoned so that subareas
denominated in the Table below, which are designated and described
on the named Exhibits (attached hereto), shall be changed from the
zoning designation in the column entitled "Existing Zoning" to the
zoning designation in the column entitled "Proposed Zoning":
Exhibit
Existing
Zonina
Proposed
Zonina
Part 1:
Area 1A
Area 1B
Area 2
Area 3
Ar~a' 4
Part 2 :
Part 3:
Area 1
A R-3 R-3-P-22
A R-3 R-3-P-14
A R 3 R 3 (No Change)
A R-3 R-1
. R 3 R 3 (No Change)
....
B R-3 R-3-P-14
C
R-3
R-3-P-22
SECTION 2. Special Development Standard Requirements for Zone
with "P"-modifier relating to Destruction of Pre-existing, Non-
Conforming Use.
For those above designated subareas containing the "P"
modifier in their zoning designation,2 as part of the development
standards that the City will incorporate into any precise plans for
the development or use of property within said subareas, one such
development standard shall be that, notwithstanding section
19.64.150 of the Chula vista Municipal Code, all existing uses
within the Study Area which are made non-conforming as a result of
this action shall be allowed to be reconstructed in the event of
destruction even if the degree of destruction is greater than 60%
of the property's improvements, subject to review and approval of
the Planning commission. The Council finds that this mandatory
2
g-..~
development standard is necessary to accomplish the Council's
objective in this particular case, to wit: to stabilize the
existing neighborhood from further increases in density.
SECTION 3. School Impact Fees Policy.
As a matter of policy, the City of Chula vista shall enforce
such legal mechanisms sponsored by the Chula vista School District
and the Sweetwater Union High School District as may be approved by
the city to mitigate impacts on school facilities.
SECTION 4: This ordinance shall take effect and be in full
force on the thirtieth day from and after its adoption.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
Robert A. Leiter, Director of
Planning
Bruce M. Boogaard, city Attorney
studybll.wp
3
~~3
/
-/
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
ITEM TITLE: a) Public Hearing on the
Storm Drain Fee
b) Ordinance % 1./1.3
Chula Vista Municipal
Fund
O?\\O~
c) l~S1flution II. ~O
(f>..\)\\0..G. ~ a Storm Drain Fee
d) S'-'
St..~BMITTED BY:
Item 1i> cr
Meeting Date 6/11/91
enactment of an ordinance establishing a
Adding Chapters 3.21 and 14.16 to the
Code to establish a Storm Drain Fee and
Amending the Master Fee Schedule to add
REVIEWED BY:
Director of Public Work~
City Manage~
(4/5ths Vote: Yes___No-X-)
On December 8, 1988, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)
proposed regul at ions for the issuance of National Poll utant Di scharge
Elimination System (NPDES) permits to regulate storm water discharge into the
waters of the United States. The final version of these regulations was
issued on November 16, 1990. These permits will require agencies discharging
storm water to develop management programs for the purpose of controll ing
po 11 utants. The proposed Storm Ora in Fee wi 11 pay for the estab 1 i shment and
implementation of said programs. Fee collection is proposed to commence on
July 1, 1991.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the items as described in the titles
above.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
The City is facing a Federal requirement for control of storm water pollutants
that is costly to implement, and will require early planning and preparation.
The Uni ted States Envi ronmenta 1 Protection Agency (EPA) proposed regul at ions
(publ ished December 8, 1988 in the Federal Register) for the issuance of
National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permits to regulate
storm water discharge into the waters of the United States. The final version
of these regulations was issued on November 16, 1990. In order to allow local
agencies an opportunity to come into compliance with the EPA requirements
gradually, the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) issued
an "early" NPDES permit on July 16, 1990, to San Diego County region agencies
which exercise jurisdiction over land development matters.
The "early' permit requires us to develop a management program for the purpose
of controlling pollutants. The existing program, which is mainly a
maintenance effort, requires the City to spend approximately $46,000 to clean
its drainage facilities per year. If the level of maintenance should increase
in connection with the NPDES program, the cost of that effort will al so
increase.
~19-1
Page 2, Item 1.3
Meeting Date 6/11/91
The Port District is also one of the agencies named as a co-permittee. We
anticipate that the Port District will experience a proportionately greater
cost than most of the other agencies because of the nature of the industries
located within the District's jurisdiction and the immediacy of the industrial
activities to the bay. The implementation agreement recently approved by
Council included a formula for calculation of the portion of the annual permit
fee to be paid by each co-permittee. Under that formula each of the
co-permittees (including the Port District) share equally in one-half of the
administrative costs of the permit. The remaining one-half is shared by all
co-permittees other than the Port District on the basis of "Household"
population.
Participation in the program to a greater extent than provided in the permit
and the Implementation Agreement would need to be approved by the Board of
Port Commissioners. Discussion with Port District staff indicates that their
recommendation to the Board of Commissioners would be that the District stay
with those previously accepted limits of responsibility. .
Applicable Federal regulations require the City to carry out a large number of
new tasks regarding the management of the storm drain system. These tasks
include the establ ishment of monitoring, detection and enforcement programs
leading to the elimination of pollution in the storm water and urban runoff
1 eaving our boundari es. The essent i a 1 costs of the program result from the
completion of these tasks, which have been started in the 1990-91 fiscal year.
Major areas of effort involve the following:
1. Conduct stormwater conveyance system inspections.
2. Plan and conduct surveys and characterizations needed to identify the
pollutant sources and drainage areas.
3. Prepare management programs, monitoring programs, and implementation
pl ans.
4. Imp 1 ement management programs, mon i tori ng programs, and other plans as
required by this Order.
5. Submit stormwater conveyance system maps with periodic revisions as
necessary.
6. Prepare and submit all reports to the principal permittee in a timely
manner.
7. Enact 1 egi sl ation and ordi nances as necessary to ensure compl i ance with
the stormwater management programs and the implementation plans.
8. Pursue enforcement actions as necessary to ensure compl iance with the
stormwater management programs and the implementation plans.
~- 7'-.:1
Page 3, Item l~
Meeting Date 6/11/91
9. Ensure adequate response to emergency situations such as accidental spills, leaks, illicit
discharges, etc.
10. Abide by the terms of the Implementation Agreement (approved by Council on 2/19/91).
It is estimated that staff will spend a number of hours this fiscal year involving direct and
administrative costs. It is estimated that this cost will be $76,740.
In order to establish and implement the NPDES program, it is proposed that a storm drain fee
be added to the Master Fee Schedule. The effect of the fee will be to reimburse the General
Fund appropriately for the costs associated with the NPDES program. The fee is proposed to
be initially $.70 per month per dwelling unit for single family dwellings, and six ($.06) cents
per hundred cubic feet of water consumed for multi-family, commercial, or industrial accounts
per calendar month with a $500 maximum.
The revenues are based on a total number of single family dwelling units of 27,300 and an
estimated water consumption rate of 3.1 MGD for multi-family and 3.1 MGD for commercial
usage. The total estimated annual revenues are $405,000.
The estimated direct cost of the NPDES program for FY 1991-92 is approximately $405,000.
This includes costs expected to be generated in 1990-91.
The cost breakdown is presented as follows:
Maintenance
Consultant Fees and Miscellaneous Costs
Office Equipment
Personnel
Personnel Related Costs
$ 46,000
200,000
10,000
131,000
18.000
$405,000
In future years, there will be little or no costs included for office equipment. However, the cost
of maintenance is expected to increase to reflect additional maintenance responsibilities. On the
other hand, the expense already incurred or expected to be incurred in 1990-91 will not be a cost
factor in 1992-93.
\~ 9-3
Page 4, Item~~
Meeting Date 6/11/91
It is proposed to start collecting
fee annually for possible revision.
the means for collecting the fee:
I. To be collected by the water companies with the sewer service charges.
the fee on July 1, 1991 and to review the
There are two options available regarding
2. To be collected with the property tax bill by the County Assessor's
office.
This storm drain fee would be paid only by all parties connected to the City's
sewer system. An undeveloped property would not normally be expected to
contribute to pollution and there are very few developed properties in the
City which are not served by the sewer system.
We are still pursuing the first option with the staffs of the water
companies. If they are able to accommodate this additional billing, it will
require that new agreements providing for that payment be worked out. A final
decision would, of course, be made by their Boards of Directors if Council
chooses to pursue this option.
It should be noted that some of thi s bill ing must be accompl i shed by the
County anyway, since the Montgomery area has not been set up for sewer billing
by the water companies and, as indicated in a recent report to Council on
sewer charges for 1991-92, this situation is not proposed to be changed during
the coming year.
FISCAL IMPACT: Approximate
initially. The fee is proposed
offset the costs of the program.
revenues estimated at $33,750 per month
to be reviewed and revised as necessary to
SMN/mad:File #KY-181
WPC 5640E
~
'7-JI
,.)(~
" LI'"
4f- "'--.-<-."'il"'"
~', <....' t)
ORDINANCE NO. 2.::5 "<".'>,,,
J.:..U",
'{. ;lr:
~( #,111
AN ORD1NANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADDING "1{0
CHAPTERS 3.21 ANa 14.16 TO THE CHULA VISTA ~~Q
MUNICIPAL CODE TO ESTABLISH A STORM DRAIN FEE I~O~
The City Council of the City of Chula vista does ordain
as follows:
SECTION I: That Chapter 3.21 is added
Vista Municipal Code to read:
to the Chula
CHAPTER 3.21
STORM DRAIN REVENUE FUND.
Establishment of Storm Drain Revenue
Fund-Uses.
Sec. 3.21.010
A. There is established a fund to be designated as the
"Storm Drain Revenue Fund".
B. All revenues derived from the Storm Drain Fee set
forth in Chapter 14.16 shall be deposited into sald
fund.
C. The fund shall be used solely for the following
purposes unless the City Council appropriates such
funds for another purpose by a four-fifth's vote:
to pay for the serVlces of cleaning storm drain
inlets, underground drainage systems, lined and
unlined storm drainage channels or ditches, and
planning costs associa ted wi th compliance wi th the
conditions imposed upon the City by the "early
permit" issued to the City by the Regional Water
Quality Control Board on July 16, 1990 to establish
a local-level National pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES), all in accordance with
the federal Clean Water Act.
SECTION II: That Chapter 14 .16 is added to the Chula
Vista Municipal Code to read:
CHAPTER 14.16 STORM DRAIN FEE.
Sec. 14.16.010 Purpose.
The purpose of this chapter is to establish a storm
Drain Fee applicable to all parcels of real property
within the City limits connected to the wastewater
system, or the water system of the otay Municipal Water
-1:'"
q~1 Ie
... 9-5
District or the Sweetwater Authority. It is necessary
to require system users to pay for the services of
clean~ng storm drain inlets, underground dra~nage
systems, lined and unlined storm drainage channels or
di tches, and planning costs associated wi th compl iance
with the conditions imposed upon the City by the "early
permit" issued to the City by the Regional Water Quality
Control Board on July 16, 1990 to establish a
local-level Natlonal pollutant Discharge Elimination
system (NPDES), all in accordance with the federal Clean
Water Act.
Sec. 14.16.020 Storm Drain Fee Established-Payment
Required-Real Property Defined.
A. In addition to other fees, assessments or charges
provided by the city code or otherwise, the owner
or occupant of any parcel of real property which
parcells connected to the wastewater system of the
City and to a water system maintained by the
Sweetwater Authority, the Otay Municipal Water
District, or the California American Water Company
shall pay a storm drain fee as presently
designated, or as may hereafter be amended, by
resolution in the Master Fee Schedule. Whenever an
increase is proposed in said fee, a notice of the
proposed increase shall be posted by the City Clerk
for at least ten (10) days pr~or to Clty Councll
consideration.
B. For the purposes of this section, real property
shall be deemed to be used for domestic purposes
when such property is used solely for single-family
residences, or the furnishlng of lodglng by the
operations of hotels, auto courts, apartment
houses, bungalow courts, housing units, roomin
houses, motels, tra~ er par s, or t e rental 0
property for lodglng) purposes.
C. All storm drain fee imposed under this chapter
shall be computed, collected, and subJect to the
same penalties and requirements as set forth in
Sections 13.14 .110 and 13.14 .150 relating to sewer
service charges. All proceeds of the storm drain
fee shall be deposited in the Storm Drain Revenue
Fund.
SECTION III: Operative Date. The imposition of the new
storm drain fee shall not be operative until July 18, 1991.
-2-
I~ 7-(,
SECTION IV. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take
effect and be in full force on the thirtieth day from and after
its adoption.
presented by Approved as to form by
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
8442a
.
'-7
PROOF OF PUBUCA TION
(2015.S C.C.P.)
ST A TE OF CALIFORNIA,
County of San Diego:
I am a citizen of the United Stales and a
residenl of Ihe County aforesaid; I am over
Ihe age of eighteen years, and not a party
to or interested in the above-entitled matter.
I am the principal clerk of the printer of the
CHULA VIS1 A S1 AR.NEWS, a newspaper of
general circulation, printed and published
TWICE WEEKLY in the City of Chula Vista,
and the South Bay Judicial District, County of
Son Diego, State of Califomia, under the date
of Aug. B, 1932, Case Number 71752; that
the notice, of which the annexed is a printed
copy (set in type not smaller than nonpareil).
has been published in each regular and entire
issue of said newspaper and not in any supple-
ment thereof on the following dates, to-wit:
This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Slomp
.... ......D.RD......2.4.63.................... ............. ............
c-t.arga Elimination
Syatem(NPDES).aU In accor-
danca with the fed.,., CI..n
Water Act.
88c.14.16.02O Storm Drain
F.. ,Establlshed.Payment
Requlred-A..l Property
Defined.
A.ln addition to other ....,
a.....m.nt. or charg..
provided by the city cad. or
otherwls., the owner or 0c-
cupant of any parca' of prop-
eny which parcall. connec-
ted 10 the waMawata, .ystem
of the City and to . watar
.ystam malntalnad by the
SWHtwater Authority, the
Olay Munlcl,.1 Water Dla-
trlct. or the California Ameri-
can Wa.er Company .han
,.y a starm drain ... a. pra-
.antly dealgnateel, or.. may
h.re.ft.r be am.nded. bY
rasolutlon In the M....r Fee
Schedul..Whenever .n .in-
cr.... I. prOr,:"d In Mid
f.a. . notice 0 the propoHd
Incr.... .h.n be poetad by
the Chy Clerk for at Ie..t t.n
(10) day. prior to City Coun-
cil con.lderlltlon.
B. F9r the pur~.. of thl.
HQtlan.....I. p.....,.y .hall
be de.med to 1M ueecr for
domearic purpo... when
.uch property r. uud .00ely
f9r .Ingl..f.mlly . r..ld.n-
ce.,orthe furnl.hlng oflodg-
Ing by the oparatlone of ho-
ter..auto court.,apartment
hou.e. bungal,ow
caurte,hou.~g unit., roam-
Ing hou....mot.la,tr.ller
paru.Of' the rental of prop-
.rtylo< 'odg'n. P"....-.
C, All storm C1raln ... I..
po.KI undar thl. chapter
.hall be computed, conae-
ted,.nd subject to the Mme
plIn.III.. .nd requirement.
aa .et forth In Section.
; 13.14.110... 1=-.14.150 re-
~ I.tlng ..uwat,......IDIo.ch.r.
g...A......l....t.."et the
storm ttrliin ... ..... b. de-
c::=-~ ~\.,~ Dr.m
-;;.::.=Rn...l)~~~~;~::
storm ..... : . not be
o .. t991.
~:lt' t tON.. ..' ~'.' . '.' f~ctlve
D....1ftIS .. ,~.shall tak.e
I eff8Cl........... ."ce on the
thlrr.tV-_toIit'~d after its
;a~":'_,,':""'-,\:-
Pr...at..' ay: John
P .L1ppitt,Dlrecf(J' "ot Public I
WorkS., .
Approved by form by: Bruce
M.Boogaard.Clty Attorney.
CV01938 6122191
6/22
011 in the year 19...:1.1...
I cerlily (or declare) under penalty of perjury Ihal
the foregoing is true and correct.
Doled 01 .........C.lJ.!J..l.9.....V..t~.t.9...........................
California, this...2.2 day of .....J.J.lne........, 19..9..1.
...f:L.IM:...~...........
Signature
al Clerk
..8
Proof of Pubiicatian of
ORDINANCE NO. 2463
AN ORDINANCE OF THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA AD-
DING CHAPTERS ".21 AND .
14.16 TO ,THE CHULA VISTA
MUNICIPAL CODE TO es-
TABLISH A, STORM DRAIN
FEE
The City Council of the City
of Chl,lta Vista does ordain as
follows:
SECTION I: That Chapter
3.21 Is added to the ehula
Vista Municipal Code to read:
CHAPTER 3.21 STORM
DRAIN REVENUE FUND.
a.c.3.21.010 Eet.b-
I lI.hment of Storm Drain R..
: venue Fund-U...
A. Th.... I. HI.bU.hed .
fund to be dulgnated ..
Ih."$lorm Drain Revenue
Fund".
B. All ...veoo.. derived
trom the Storm DrIIln F.. HI
forth In Ch.pter 14.16 .hall
ba depo.lted Into ..Id fund.
C. The fund ah.11 be used
'-olely tor th. ~Iowtng pur-
po... unl... the eny coun-
cil approprl.te. suoh fund.
tor another pu~. by,.
tour-flfth's vote: to pay for
the .ervlce. or cle.nlng
'atorm drain Inlet.. under-
ground drlllnage .yatem.,
fined and unRn.d .torm
dr.lnage ch.nnel. or dlt-
che.. and planning ooata....
socl.tad with compll.nce
with the conditione Im~.ed
upon the City by the '..rly
parmlt"I..ued to the City by
the Reglanal Water Quality
Control Bo.rd on July
16.1990 to ....bUM a local-
leva' National Pollutant 01..
.ha..E-......m
(NPDI . ,",ora iNInrd.nce
with t .CIiMft Water
Act. . ""'-"'. ", .~.,
SECTrdH-rt: 'II' ' h~18r
14.16 .,IIdd8It. . ._' ..~.. ,Chura
Vrsta....nlCrIiaI~, 'taad:
CHAPTEA- ......1~, ORM
. '..L.......:
DRAIN.FEE.'~:'..g';
Sec. 14.1..010 .'. '.. .. ...
The purpae. ill . Ch.p-
ter I. to ........4.; Slonn
Drain Fee.,.. ..' . to .n
parce.. .. '~,:2~perty
within theetty Ibl'lMWMfiGnnec-
ted tlil Ute ....lIIwa-t.r
I system or 1M ___,ayatem I
at tha enay -Municipal Water :
District or the Sweetwater
Authority.!t I. nac....ry to
, require syatem ueers to p.y
I for the s.rwlc.. of cle.nlng
storm drain Inleta, under-
ground dr.lnage .yatem..
\ nnad .nd unlined atorm
1 drainage channel. or dit-
ches, .nd planning coats a..
soclated with compll.nce
with the conditions Imp'oeed
upon the City by the 'early
permit" IHued to the City by
the Regional Water Qu.lhy
Control Board on JUlY, 16.
1 ggO 10 e.labll.h a acel_
RESOLUTION NO.
l~doO
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE MASTER FEE SCHEDULE
TO ADD A STORM DRAIN FEE
The City Council of the city of Chula vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, it has become necessary to charge system users
fOr the costs of maintenance of the storm drain system, including
costs of compliance with the federal Clean Water Act to establish
a local program implementing the National Pollutant Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES); and
WHEREAS, the Council will adopt an ordinance creating a
Storm Drain Fee, effective July 18, 1991 in the amount set forth in
the Master Fee Schedule.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the city Council of the
City of Chula vista that the Master Fee Schedule is amended,
effective July 18, 1991 by adding the following:
Section 14.16.020
storm Drain Fee.
In addition to other fees, assessments or charges
provided by the city code or otherwise, the owner or
occupant of any parcels of real property which parcel is
connected to the wastewater system of the city and to a
water system maintained by the Sweetwater Authority, the
Otay Municipal Water District or the California-American
Water Company shall pay a storm drain fee as follows,
applicable to the first whole billing period subsequent
to July 18, 1991:
A. Domestic, Single Family: The domestic storm drain
fee for each single family dwelling unit serviced
by a separate water meter shall be $.70 per month;
B. Domestic, MUlti-family, and Commercial and
Industrial: a monthly storm drain fee for parcels
of real property used for domestic purposes as
herein defined other than single family dwellings,
and commercial and industrial establishments, and
serviced by a water meter, shall be at the rate of
$.06 per each one hundred cubic feet of water usage
by such parcel, but in no case more than $500.00
per month.
C.
Montgomery Area: Notwithstanding
prov1s1ons, an annual Storm Drain Fee
in the former Montgomery area shall
the above
for parcels
be at the
\~ 9-9
Presented by
following rates:
1..
Domestic Single Family
mobilehomes): $8.40 per year.
(including
2.
Domestic MUlti-Family and Commercial and
Industrial: $.06 per hundred cubic feet of
water usage, based on the prior year's actual
consumption, subject to annual adjustment for
overage or underage based on current year's
actual consumption; but in no case shall be
more than $6,000 per year. These rates will
be collected on the annual tax bill by the San
Diego County Tax Collector.
Approved as to form by
Director of
John P. Lippitt,
Public Works
c:\wp Sl\Reso
\STORM DRAIN FEE
\~ 9-;t!J
. ,
.
.
TABLB l:
BJrl:8Tl:lfG UD PROPOSBD GBJlBRAL PLU DBSIGIfATl:OIfS UD ZOlfllfG
Existing Proposed Existing Proposed
General Plan General Plan Zonina Zonina
Part 1:
Area 1A Low-Medium Medium-High R-3 R-3-P-22
Area 1B Low-Medium Medium-High R-3 R-3-P-14
Area 2 Low-Medium High R-3 R-3
Area 3 Low-Medium . Low-Medium R-3 R-l
Area 4 Medium-High High R-3 R-3
Part 2: Low-Medium Medium High R-3 R-3-P-14
Part 3:
Area 1 Low-Medium Medium High R-3 R-3-P-22
Area 2 High Professional C-Q & C-Q-P
& Admin C-Q-P
Commercial
Low-Medium Density Residential = 3-6 d.u. per gross acre
Medium-High Density Residential - 11-18 d.u. per gross acre
High Density Residential = 18-27 d.u. per gross acre
EXISTING AND PROPOSED TABLE
GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATIONS & ZONING 1
LETllERI-McIN1YRE AND ASSOCIATES
~'t:., i'1 9-1/
I
'\ I t-. .~'---..Jct
- PARK WA'f---, I:~.. .. ., b i
.....: " 'i. I ~ l~.,,,. I.. / I.:
.. U!!!!' "
G
....in
~ ..,1 i
, t ii ~..
. : . f--1 . ..;~t---
, ~5---
't~--- '~I
. I I
. , I
--"""--- ~ : I
:1 .
- . ~ .i
I !
MADRONA
t i i
:i ~...
iel
SUBAREA 1A
, ,
I '
. 1 t- - -.-
j .
..,
~
i
<---
"'r-Y/
~3
. . -;
i
1
_ i )'
. ..-._--
I
-_......~ - ~-
.
.--'-- -
'.._ ___.J
,
I
SUBAREA 1B
ALVARADO
'~r
. ,
. I
-~.
--~...,,~.
SUBA
ROOSEVELT ST
...-_____li
i
-..---4
,
I
..-.!
j
---,
I
- - - - .
--..-.-.--
1
.
r----------
i -
l' -- -,
, -
\ '
SUBAREA 4
-- "'1
,
,-----~-
---..
r - - - -
H
S~I
~,
i.. __
,
:r _ ....-..
_ _ r - - -
'--------
t
r
I
SHASTA
STREET
f' ~p:::!! \\,
_:f---t..,...,...----, ,;---""\,,~,_
! , '" '( .'\ \ '
I '
.. . - ~ .
! ' ,
~ .
f - - i I:
- --:.', I I,'
---;-/
I i-
- uv).-
1-- - -. .
GENERAL PLAN/ZONING CONSISTENCY
STUDY - SPECIAL STUDY AREA Bl
PART I
N
~
EXHIBIT
A
SCALE: 1-. 300'
LETllERI.McIN1YRE AND ASSOCIATES
/.Y ~ 9-IJ..
!
I.
i
i
F STRt:t; I
...... ..... . .... .~ .
, .' . - a:
t ..~~:~~ :
, ..:. .....,' ~
~ '. ,I '~ '':
. . .... - ~...
t. \' -.... "
... -".- .
h
.
- -.. ..j
,
,
---.....
,
I ---~
- - - ~ -- -- j i
1<
~ - .,
,
.
.. - - - -I - _ _
;(1)
,- - u;---ig ---
r----.---~ --
l--------i~----
I - - -: I .
. '
- - -,- .. - .. - -- -.-
.L .....
CENTER STREET
llrrl
-. 1
. i ~
1 i I
liS
~ ,
l I; I
~: t
: !
~
CYPRESS
r - - --
r - --
L __ ~
, ' ,
-~
,
;
.
. I
I !
i
- i
<
I
- - .,
i
- - - .....
- - _ J
. ,
I
--...;
i
- - .,
1
--1
I
ST~I
--i
- -1 ~
'- ~1 ~
S'TFa:.t:.
I ' ,
, I '
i . i.
I ' .'
, I
! I !
, 1 '
,
I
- -I
G ~.
GENERAL PLAN/ZONING CONSISTENCY
STUDY - SPECIAL STUDY AREA B1
PART II
LETJlERI-McIN1YRE AND ASSOCIATES
-.
f__
N
..
EXHIBIT
B
SCALE: t-. 200'
~ 7'-13
)
.l .
- - -'! i
<
1-- --
r--]
u
I
: t - -
, I
1 '
I I
I
_---I
~ I
. I
i
E
~ .
I
; ,
! I
I
I
I I
;l
i I
- --1
I ' - - -
<r -~-, ,
- - - - - - - - - - -
I
I ----1
- - _. -' t - I
l I .. - - - - ,
;
SUBAREA 1 t- - - - - ...
. ~ - ---I i
) ! ;
'- - - ... r - - - ~ I I
,
,
, DAVDSON STRI:c .'"
i I ! --J
- . .'-
, - - ~ --1 ! I
, I
i
! ,
I lei)
Ii '~
~ 10
~I I
I~ I - - -
, I
, I
!
.
F STtti:1
, . ,'" - , '-. I
I 1. ~,.! . '-
I
GENERAL PLAN/ZONING CONSISTENCY
STUDY - SPECIAL STUDY AREA Bl
PART III - SUBAREA 1
N
-
SCALE: 1-. 200'
LEITlERI.MdN1YRE AND ASSOCIATES
4!J llf '7'-
STf=c1
I
l --. ~
,
L _ _ __,
- - - - -. ....
i l
i
LANSEl. y WAY
f i i:
l-:=J;
i. I ~
I U!I
~I
~
MONTCBEU.O
,
- - _ ~l
- - - !
!
---1
I
I
EXHIBIT
C
..,
. I
n
i
,
I
,
~ _. --....
---.---- -
DAVDSON
)
IF. sl
i
!
---;
I
I
---l
I
:<1
j~~
; l
i I
l r-
l~
E
~:.,l
-
,
i
,
I
i
I
I
.. + ---j
!
: -_.~
I
STREET
CIVIC
CENTER
I
Ii
i(
,
,
;
---j
I
STRt:t:1
i :
i i
I !
I ,
, I
i i
I -1<
---1---;
I " !
I JI I
!H8
~ ii' i
9 I I
~ II I
1 .
I GLl8R~RY(~~R'~1
H;
,
':'- ':: - /---~/':.~- /'j,:.1
.,.. .'" . - ,
. .....
. ~ ':- ~>. ~~ / ';~',;, ,..:"~ t., r
(HULA VISTA
PUBLIC LI 8RARY
N
~
GENERAL PLAN/ZONING CONSISTENCY
STUDY - SPECIAL STUDY AREA Bl
PART III - SUBAREA 2
EXHIBIT
- D
SCAlE: 1-. 200'
LETI1ERI.McIN1YRE AND ASSOCIATES
. 9-
l----
l--- -
,
f-----
,
l-----
!
---
,
!
,---
r~ --
L
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item IlJ
Ordinance :1.4/,,;, Amending sections 9.20.020,
9.20.040, 9.20.045, 9.20.050, and adding section
9.20.035 to chapter 9.20 property defacement of the
Chula vista Municipal Code first reading.
SUBMI'l"l'ED BY: Director of Public WorksQ~L
REVIEWED BY: City Manager8 J.fJ/ (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No_X..J
At the May 28, 1991, City Council meeting Council requested that
staff return with an ordinance requiring property owners to remove
graffiti within a period of 7 to 10 days. At that meeting, staff
informed Council that the Graffiti Control Subcommittee was already
considering such an ordinance and would return with an ordinance on
graffiti control that addressed removal of graffiti by property
owners and other items.
Meeting Date 6/18/91
ITEK TITLE:
RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the ordinance amending section
9.20 of the Municipal Code.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: The Graffiti Control
Subcommittee consisting of members from utilities, developers,
Chamber of Commerce, school districts, and city staff have all
reviewed the attached ordinance and recommend its adoption.
DISCUSSION:
The Graffiti Control SUbcommittee, which has been meeting since May
2, 1991, had considered various amendments to the City Code in
regards to property defacement. On April 18, 1991 the City
Attorney submitted and Council adopted an ordinance which amended
section 9.20 of the code by: defining aerosol containers; included
felt-tip markers as prohibited items for minors to possess; and
prohibited the sale or furnishing of aerosol spray cans or felt-tip
pens to minors. In addition it changed the violation from an
infraction to a misdemeanor at the discretion of the City Attorney.
As indicated above, the subcommittee at the recommendation of the
city Attorney decided that other amendments were also called for.
These are enumerated briefly below.
1. Require property owners to remove graffiti with seven days.
2. Require that establishments displaying and selling aerosol
paint containers and felt-tip markers place these in an area
which is not normally accessible to customers during working
hours.
3. Require that all property owners (including homeowners) keep
aerosol spray containers and felt-tip markers in a securely
enclosed room which is not normally accessible to other people.
/0 -I
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date 6/18/91
However, it was further determined by the subcommittee that
this would not be enforced except if it had been found that
violation has contributed to an act of vandalism.
4. Indicated that parents have civil responsibility for damages
of their children if they knowingly permit them to possess an
aerosol paint container of felt-tip marker.
5. Finds that any person who displays or stores aerosol spray
containers, felt-tip markers in violation of provisions of the
ordinance shall be civilly liable for all costs up to $1,500,
which will permit the filing claims in small claims court.
The subcommittee discussed all of these proposed changes to the
ordinance at length. The owner of Cornell's Office Supplies
represented the Chamber and contacted other such business owners
and gave their feedback on the appropriateness of requiring the
more stringent display and sale requirements. As a whole, the
subcommittee agreed that the cost to society caused by persons
applying graffiti to utility boxes, concrete walls, etc. needs be
taken into consideration by the individuals selling these items
and, therefore, it is warranted that the City require a secure
display.
The item that caused the most discussion by the subcommittee was
the section that requires everyone including the city and
homeowners to keep felt-tip markers and aerosol cans in an enclosed
secure room. Wording was worked out that would take into account
the fact that the budget manager, for example, may have felt-tip
markers on her desk or in her office and may leave her office from
time to time in the conduct of the business day, but that her
office is still in a building which will be locked at the end of
the business day. In addition it was determined that the
provision that enforcement would not take place except when it was
found that violation of this section of the code had led to
graffiti would go a long way toward mitigating the intrusion of
local government into people's private lives. All of these issues
are indicated in the marked up ordinance which is attached for
Council's consideration.
The above discussion has dealt with the ordinance, in general, as
it applies to citizens and businesses in the community. This
section will deal briefly with the ordinance as it applies to the
ci ty, itself, as a municipal corporation. The requirement that all
graffiti be removed from property within seven days applies to the
city as well as to utility companies, private individuals, and
businesses. The City has 5 1/2 linear miles of lined concrete
drainage channels. Each drainage channel has two sides which makes
up about 11 miles and each side is anywhere from 4' - 10' high. As
Council can see, this is a large area from which staff will be
responsible for insuring that graffiti is removed. In addition,
the city has over 100 traffic signal intersections, each
I()-~
Page 3, Item_
Meeting Date 6/18/91
of which has a traffic signal controller box, may have a power
pedestal and has four standards which may be marked with graffiti.
The city also has over 4,000 street light standards, some of which
have been marked with graffiti.
CUrrently, the city is already removing graffiti from municipal
buildings, park restrooms, park equipment etc. It had not,
however, been removing all graffiti on controller boxes, drainage
channels etc. within seven days but had been responding as soon as
possible with the staff that we have. Requirement for removal
within seven days will require the addition of two maintenance
workers to the traffic paint operations section at a cost of about
$94,000 the first year and an on-going cost of about $75,000 per
year. This includes equipment such as a truck, sprayer, paint,
graffiti remover, etc. This will be discussed in further detail in
the Supplemental Budget Report on Graffiti Control which you also
received for today's meeting. It should be noted that the City of
National city, which is much smaller than Chula Vista, had
estimated that they would spend about $96,000 per year for graffiti
removal but most likely will spend about $150,000 for a graffiti
removal contract. The city of Southgate, from which the City
Attorney came to us, spends over $170,000 per year for graffiti
removal.
FISCAL IMPACT:
As indicated above, the first year's cost of the ordinance to the
City will be about $96,000 and will be further discussed in the
Supplemental Budget Report on Graffiti Control.
DB:mp
(COAGAMGC)
10-3
ORDINANCE NO.~
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING
SECTIONS 9.20.020, 9.20.040, 9.20.045, 9.20.050, AND
ADDING SECTION 9.20.035 TO CHAPTER 9.20, PROPERTY
DEFACEMENT
The City Council of the city of Chula Vista does ordain
as follows:
SECTION I: That sections 9.20.020, 9.20.040, 9.20.045
and 9.20.050 of Chapter 9.20 are amended to read as follows:
9.20.020 Definitions.
A. "Deface", as used in this Chapter, means the
intentional altering by physical, mechanical or
chemical means of the physical shape, dimension,
contour or appearance of property.
B. "Aerosol paint container" means any aerosol
container, regardless of the material from which it
made, which is adapted or made for the purpose of
spraying paint or other substance capable of defacing
property. (Ord. , Sec. 1, 1991)
C. "Felt tip marker" means any indelible marker or
similar implement with a tip which, at its broadest
~eiftt width is greater than one-eighth (ljSth) inch,
containing an ink that is not water-soluble. (Ord.
, Sec. 1, 1991)
9.20.040 Prohibition of sale, possession, display for
purposes of sale, and storage of aerosol
paint containers.
A. Sale or Furnishing to Minors. It shall be unlawful
for any person, other than a parent or legal guardian,
to sell, exchange, give, loan, or otherwise furnish, or
cause or permit to be sold, exchanged, given, loaned,
or otherwise furnished, any aerosol paint container to
any person under the age of eighteen years without the
consent of the parent or other lawfully designated
custodian of the person, which consent shall be given
in person.
B. Possession. It shall be unlawful for any person
under the age of eighteen years to have in his or her
grafS.wp
June 11, 1991
Proposed Additions to Grafitti Ordinance
Page 1
)1) -1
possession any aerosol paint container while upon
public property or upon private property without the
consent of the owner of such private property whose
consent shall be as to the person's presence while in
the possession with a aerosol paint container.
C. Displav for the Purposes of Sale. No person. firm
or entity enaaaed in a commercial enterprise ("Seller")
shall display any aerosol paint container for sale.
trade or exchanae. nor shall store any aerosol paint
container pendina display for sale or pendina sale.
except in an area from which the public shall be
secure Iv precluded without employee assistance. Two
such acceptable methods for displavina aerosol paint
containers for sale shall be bv containment in (1) a
completelY enclosed cabinet or other storaae device
which shall be permanent Iv affixed to a buildina or
buildina structure. and which shall. at all times
except durina access bv authorized representatives.
remain securelY locked: or in an enclosed area behind a
sales or service counter from which the public is
precluded from entry.
D. Wronaful Storaae of Aerosol Paint containers. No
person shall store any aerosol paint container except
in either (1) a completelY enclosed room which shall.
at all times except durina access or substantial
occupancy bY the owner or an authorized adult
representative of the owner. remain securelY locked: or
(2) in a completely enclosed cabinet or other storaae
device which shall be permanently affixed to a buildina
or buildina structure. and which. shall. at all times
except durina access bY the owner or an authorized
adult representative of the owner. remain securelY
locked. For the purposes of this section. an owner or
authorized representative of the owner. shall be deemed
to have substantial occupancy of a room even durina
short periods of absence if the room is part of a
laraer structure which is occupied by the owner.
1. Enforcement Policy on Wronaful Storaae
Offenses. It shall be the intention of the city
to enforce this provision aaainst the "Wronaful
Storaae of Aerosol Paint Containers" onlY when its
violation has caused or contributed to an act of
vandalism by a third party.
9.20.045. Prohibition of sale, possession and display
of felt tip markers.
A. Sale or Furnishing To Minors. It shall be unlawful
grafB.wp
June 11, 1991
Proposed Additions to Grafitti Ordinance
Page 2
10 -..5
for any person, other than a parent or other legal
guardian, to sell, exchange, give, loan, or other
furnish, or cause or permit to be sold, exchanged,
given, loaned, or otherwise furnished, any felt tip
marker to any person under the age of eighteen years
without the consent of the parent or other lawfully
designated custodian of the person, which consent shall
be given in person.
B. Possession by Minors. It shall be unlawful for any
person under the age of eighteen years to have in his
or her possession any felt tip marker while upon public
property or upon private property without the consent
of the owner of such private property, except while
attending, or travelling to or from a school at which
the person is enrolled, if the person is participating
in a class at said school which has, as a written
requirement of said class, the need to use felt tip
markers.
C. Disolay for the Purooses of Sale. No oerson. firm
or entity enqaqed in a commercial enterorise ("Seller")
shall disolav any felt tio marker for sale. trade or
exchanae. nor shall store any felt tio marker oendina
disolav for sale or oendina sale. exceot in an area
from which the oublic shall be securely orecluded
without emoloyee assistance. One such acceotable
method for disolayina felt tio markers for sale shall
be in a comoletely enclosed cabinet or other storaae
device which shall be oermanentlY affixed to a buildinq
or buildina structure. and which shall. at all times
exceot durinq access bv authorized reoresentatives.
remain securely locked.
D. Wronaful Storaqe of Felt Tio Markers. No oerson
shall store any felt tio marker exceot in either (1) a
comoletelY enclosed room which shall. at all times
exceot durina access or substantial occuoancy by the
owner or an authorized adult reoresentative of the
owner. remain securelY locked: or (2) in a comoletelY
enclosed cabinet or other storaqe device which shall be
oermanently affixed to a buildina or buildina
structure. and which shall. at all times exceot durina
access bY the owner or an authorized adult
reoresentative of the owner. remain securely locked.
For the ourooses of this section. an owner or
authorized reoresentative of the owner. shall be deemed
to have substantial occuoancy of a room even durina
short oeriods of absence if the room is Dart of a
laraer structure which is occuoied by the owner.
graf8.wp
June 11, 1991
Proposed Additions to Grafitti Ordinance
Page 3
I~ - (0
Enforcement Policy on Wronqful Storaqe Offenses. It
shall be the intention of the city to enforce this
provision aqainst the "Wronqful storaqe of Felt Tip
Markers" onlY when its violation has caused or
contributed to an act of vandalism by a third party.
9.20.050. Penalties for violation of chapter.
A. Criminal Penalties. Any and all violations of this
chapter shall be punishable either as an infraction or
misdemeanor, at the discretion of the City Attorney.
It is further understood that financial parental
responsibility for any acts of vandalism shall be
strictly enforced.
B. Parental civil Responsibility for Damaqes. Any
parent or other leqal quardian who consents to.
permits. or otherwise knowinqlY allows her or his child
under the aqe of eiqhteen to possess an aerosol paint
container or a felt tip marker shall be personallY
liable for any and all costs to any person incurred bY
any party in connection with the repair of any property
caused bY said child. and for all attorney's fees and
court costs incurred in connection with the civil
prosecution of any claim for damaqes.
c. civil Responsibility for Damaqes Wronqful Display
or Storaqe. Any person who displays or stores an
aerosol spray container or felt tip marker in violation
of the provisions of this chapter shall be personally
liable for any and all costs incurred bY any party in
connection with the repair of any property caused bY a
minor who shall use such aerosol spray container or
felt tip marker in violation of the provisions of
California Penal Code section 594. and for all
attorney's fees and court costs incurred in connection
with the civil prosecution of any claim for damaqes.
not to exceed $1.500.00.
SECTION II: That Section 9.20.035 is added to Chapter
9.20 of the Chula vista Municipal Code to read as follows:
9.20.035 Permittinq Graffiti to Remain
It is unlawful for any person who is the owner or who
has primary responsibility for control of property or
who has primary responsibility for the repair or
maintenance of property ("Responsible Party") to permit
property which is defaced with qraffiti to remain so
defaced for a period of seven (7) days after notice of
same. unless said person shall demonstrate bY a
graf8.wp
June 11, 1991
Proposed Additions to Grafitti Ordinance
Page 4
If; - 7
DreDonderance of evidence that thev do not have the
financial or Dhvsical abilitv to remove the defacina
araffiti. or unless it can be demonstrated that the
ResDonsible Partv has an active Droaram for the removal
of araffiti and has scheduled the removal of the
araffiti as Dart of that Droaram. .
SECTION III: This ordinance shall take effect and be
in full force on the thirtieth day from and after its adoption.
Graf9.wp
orm by
Presented by
~
David Byers, Director of
Public Works
ity
graf8.wp
June 11, 1991
Proposed Additions to Grafitti Ordinance
Page 5
Jo-cr
CITY ATTORNEY'S BACKGROUND DRAFT
Current Text "On the Books" is in regular font.
Proposed Text is in -Shadowed- Font
Additions are Underlined.
Deletions are in Eltrilte Out.
Current and Proposed
Graffiti ordinance
9.20.010. Purpose and intent.
It is the purpose and intent of the City Council of the
City, through the adoption of this chapter, to provide additional
enforcement tools to protect public and private property from
acts of vandalism and defacement; especially, but not limited to,
graffiti on privately and publicly owned walls, which are
inimical and destructive of the rights and values of private
property owners as well as the total community. It is further
the intent of the City Council, through the adoption of this
notice upon all of those who callously disregard the property
rights of others, that the law enforcement agencies of the city,
both the police department and the prosecutor's office, will
strictly enforce the law and severely prosecute those persons
engaging in the defacement of public and private properties.
9.20.020 Definitions.
A.
altering
physical
"Deface", as used in this Chapter, means the intentional
by physical, mechanical or chemical means of the
shape, dimension, contour or appearance of property.
B. "Aerosol paint container" means any aerosol container,
regardless of the material from which it made, which is adapted
or made for the purpose of spraying paint or other substance
capable of defacing property.' (Ord. ____, Sec. 1, 1991)
C. "Felt tip marker" means any indelible marker or similar
implement with a tip which, at its broadest ~eiHt width is
greater than one-eighth (1/8th)2 inch, containing an ink that is
not water-soluble. (Ord. , Sec. 1, 1991)
9.20.030 Prohibition of defacement.
It is unlawful for any person to intentionally deface,
1. Adapted from R & T Code Section 7287.
2. Note that National City's ordinance uses "four millimeters".
graf8.wp
June 3, 1991
Proposed Additions to Grafitti Ordinance
Page 1
It; -9
alter, change, destroy, mutilate, remove, take down or take away
any public property or any private property without the consent
of the owner of such property or the public agency charged with
the trusteeship of property. A mistake as to the private
property owner's identity or lack or knowledge that such property
is held by a public agency shall not be a defense to a violation
of this section.
9.20.035 Peraitting Graffiti to Remain
It is unlawful for any person who is the owner or who has
priaary responsibility for control of property or who has primary
responsibility for the repair or aaintenance of property
(-ResDOnsible Party-) to perait property which is defaced with
graffiti to reaain so defaced for a period of S seven (7) days
after notice of same, unless said person shall demonstrate by a
preponderance of evidence that they do not have the financial or
Dhysical ability to remove the defacing graffiti. or unless it
can be demonstrated that the ResDonsible Party has an active
DrOQram for the removal of Graffiti and has scheduled the removal
of the Graffiti as Dart of that DrOGram.
9.20.040 Prohibition of sale, possession, display for purposes
of sale, and storage of aerosol paint containers.
A. Sale or Furnishing to Minors. It shall be unlawful for
any person, other than a parent or legal guardian, to sell,
exchange, give, loan, or otherwise furnish, or cause or permit to
be sold, exchanged, given, loaned, or otherwise furnished,3 any
aerosol paint container to any person under the age of eighteen
years without the consent of the parent or other lawfully
designated custodian of the person, which consent shall be given
in person.
B. Possession. It shall be unlawful for any person under
the age of eighteen years to have in his or her possession any
aerosol paint container while upon public property or upon
private property without the consent of the owner of such private
property whose consent shall be as to the person's presence while
in the possession with a aerosol paint container, 4
C. Display for the Purposes of Sale. No person, firll or
entity engaged in a commercial enterprise (-Seller-) shall
display any aerosol paint container for sale, trade or exchange,
3. This "furnish" language is offered to create a parallel with
the felt tip marker language.
4. This language is proposed for removal as inclusive of the
universe of possibilities.
graf8.wp
June 3, 1991
Proposed Additions to Grafitti Ordinance
Page 2
10 -Ii)
nor shall store any aerosol paint container pending display for
sale or pulding sale, except in an area from which the oublic
ahall be securelY orecluded without emoloyee assistance. Two
such acceDtable aethods for disDlayina aerosol oaint containers
for sale shall be by containment in (1) ~ a c01llpletely enclosed
cabinet' or other storage device which shall be permanently
affixed to a building or building structure, and which ahall, at
all tiaea except during access by authorized representatives,
reaain securely locked: or in an enclosed area behind a sales or
service counter frOll which the Dublic is Drecluded from entry. 6
D. lIrongful storage of Aerosol Paint Containers. 7 No
person shall store any aerosol paint container except in either
(1) a coapletely enclosed room which shall, at all times except
during access or substantial OCCUDanCy by the owner or an
5. This amendment was designed to address the concern of Cornell
Office Products, representing the commercial sector, that our
businesses should be given more flexibility as to how to keep
implements of graffiti from the public while at the same time,
permitting it to be displayed for sale.
6. This idea was obtained through Officer Dan Hollian, Chula
vista Police Department.
7. The regulatory aspect of this provision is admittedly
controversial because it imposes a duty on all persons to "lock
up" their "graffiti-abIes" when they are not present. The sub-
committee on graffiti ended up approving the provision, but Staff
invites the council to debate the philosophical aspects:
A. What is the purpose of the provision? To reduce vandal
access to "graffiti-abIes.
B. How effective is the provision to achieve the intended
purpose? staff believes that a significant amount of graffiti-
ables (probably more spray cans than markers) are obtained as a
result of theft from open and unattended garages, storage rooms,
etc. Staff believes that mere discussion of the provision will
help raise the level of awareness of residents of the problem and
help to keep garages and storage rooms closed and locked when
they are not in attendance.
C. What are the undesired consequences? Unfortunately, the
regulation constitutes an intrusion into the private lives of
non-vandals in order to help control a serious, community-wide
problem. We have attempted to mitigate the intrusive effect by
putting a restrictive enforcement policy in the ordinance which
provides that the section is not to be enforced except when its
violation has contributed to an act of graffiti vandalism.
graf8.wp
June 3, 1991
Proposed Additions to Grafitti Ordinance
Page 3
If) - )/
authorized adult representative of the owner, remain securely
locked; or (2) in a cOllpletely enclosed cabinet or other storaqe
device which ahall be p&raanently affixed to a building or
building struoture, and which shall, at all times except during
access by the owner or an authorized adult representative of the
owner, reaain.eourely locked. For the oumoses of this section.
an owner or authorized reoresentative of the owner. shall be
deemed to have substantial OOCUDancy of a room even durina short
oeriods of absence if the room is Dart of a laroer structure
which is ooouoied by the owner.
1. Enforcement Policy on wronaful Storaae Offenses.
It shall be the intention of the City to enforce this
Drovision aaainst the -wronaful Storaae of Aerosol
Paint containers- onlY when its violation has caused or
oontributed to an act of vandalism bY a third Darty. II
9.20.045. Prohibition of sale, possession and display of felt
tip markers.
A. Sale or Furnishing To Minors. It shall be unlawful for
any person, other than a parent or other legal guardian, to sell,
exchange, give, loan, or other furnish, or cause or permit to be
sold, exchanged, given, loaned, or otherwise furnished, any felt
tip marker to any person under the age of eighteen years without
the consent of the parent or other lawfully designated custodian
of the person, which consent shall be given in person.
B. Possession by Minors. It shall be unlawful for any
person under the age of eighteen years to have in his or her
possession any felt tip marker while upon public property or upon
private property without the consent of the owner of such private
property, except while attending, or travelling to or from a
school at which the person is enrolled, if the person is
participating in a class at said school which has, as a written
requirement of said class, the need to use felt tip markers.
C. Display for the Purposes of Sale. No person, firm or
entity engaged in a commercial enterprise (-Seller-) shall
display any felt tip Ilarker for sale, trade or exchanqe, nor
shall store any felt tip marker pending display for sale or
pending sale, except in an area from which the oubHc shall be
securely orecluded without emoloYee assistance. One such
acceotable Ilethod for disolayina felt tio markers for sale shall
be in a completely enclosed cabinet or other storage device which
8. This change was recommended by the Graffiti subcommittee as a
way of making an official policy statement without making it look
like a excuse for governmental intrusion into the private lives
of the individual members of the public.
graf8.wp
June 3, 1991
Proposed Additions to Grafitti Ordinance
Page 4
I/J - 1:l
ahall be peraanently affixed to a building or building structure,
and whic:b ahall, at all ti.es except during access by authorized
representatives, r_ain .ecurely locked.
D. wrongful storage of Felt Tip Markers. No person sh..ll
store any felt tip urker except in either (l) a completely
enclosed rooJl whic:b ahall, at all times except during access or
substantial oc:cuoanev by the owner or an authorized adult
representative of the owner, remain securely locked; or (2) in ..
coapletely enclosed cabinet or other storage device whic:b shall
be peraanently affixed to a building or building structure, and
whic:b ahall, at all tiaes except during access by the owner or an
authorized adult representative of the owner, remain securely
locked. For the DUrDOses of this section. ..n owner or ..uthorized
reDresent..tive of the owner. shall be deemed to have substantial
oc:cuoanev of a room even durinQ short oeriods of absence if the
room is Dart of a larqer structure whic:b is oc:cuDied bY the
owner.
1. Enforcement Policy on wronQful storaQe Offenses.
It shall be the intention of the city to enforce this
Drovision aQainst the .wronQful storaQe of Felt TiD
M..rkers. onlY when its violation has caused or
contributed to an act of vandalism bY a third Darty.
9.20.050. Penalties for violation of chapter.
A. Criminal Penalties. Any and all violations of this
chapter shall be punishable either as an infraction or a mis-
demeanor, at the discretion of the City Attorney.9 It is fur-
ther understood that financial parental responsibility for any
acts of vandalism shall be strictly enforced.
B. Parental civil Responsibility for Damages. Any parent
or other legal guardian who consents to, permits, or otherwise
knowingly allows her or his c:bild under the age of eighteen to
possess an aerosol paint container or a felt tip .arker shall be
personally liable for any and all costs to any person incurred by
any party in connection with the repair of any property caused by
said c:bild, and for all attorney's fees and court costs incurred
in connection with the civil prosecution of any clai. for
d....ges.
c. civil Responsibility for Damages wrongful Display or
storage. Any person who displays or stores an aerosol spr..y
container or felt tip ...rker in violation of the provisions of
9. This language is similar to Penal Code Section 594 for
graffiti vandalism. Damages for illegal sale or possession are
not expected to be significant.
graf8.wp
June 3, 1991t
Proposed Additions to Grafitti Ordinance
Page 5
If) -/3
this chapter shall be personally liable for any and all oosts
inourred by any party in oonneotion with the repair of any
property caused by . ainor who shall use such aerosol spray
container or felt tip aarker in violation of the provisions of
California Penal Code Seotion 594, and for all attorney-s f.es
and oourt oost. incurred in oonneotion with the oivil proseoution
of any olala for d&aages, not to exoeed $1.500.00.
graf8.wp
June 3, 1991
Proposed Additions to Grafitti Ordinance
Page 6
Jt) - I~
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
ITEM TITLE:
Item~ a
Meeting Date 6/18/91
Resolution \(,\c:tt Approving the Final Map and Subdivision
Improvement Agreement and Authorizing the Mayor to Execute
Said Agreement for Chula Vista Tract 88-3, EastLake Greens
Phase 10, Units 25 and 40
Resolution \\,\~ Approving supplemental agreement with
the Developer of EastLake Greens Phase 10, Units 25 and 40
needed to Satisfy Tentative Map Condition of Approval No. 31(c)
Director of Public Work~
City Manager@" (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No_.!.J
On July 25, 1989, by Resolution No. 15200, the City Council approved the
Tentat i ve Subdi vi s i on Map for Chul a Vi sta Tract 88-3, EastLake Greens. The
Final Map and associated agreements for Phase 10, Units 25 and 40 are now
before Council for approval.
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the resolutions.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
The project is generally located south of Cl ubhouse Dri ve between EastLake
Parkway and Hunte Parkway and consists of three lots. Lots 1 and 2 (Unit 40)
compose the southern half of the golf course at EastLake Greens and Lot 3
(Unit 25) is a large lot to be further subdivided for residential use.
Unit 25 was originally included for development in Phase 2B of the EastLake
Greens planned development. However, a condition of approval of the tentative
,. map provided that the developer could request deviation from the original
ph as i ng plan. The Pl anni ng and Publ i c Works Departments have revi ewed the
proposed change and support it. Adequate access will be provided by the
extension of South Greensview Drive to the southerly 1 imits of Unit 25 with
this development.
The Final Map for Chula Vista Tract 88-3 Phase ID, Units 25 and 40 has been
reviewed by the Public works Department and found to be in substantial
conformance with the approved Tentative Map. Approval of the map constitutes
acceptance of sewer, drainage and tree planting easements and rejecting
portions of lots 1 and 2 reserved for future streets within the subdivision as
shown on the map. However, the City reserves the right to accept the rejected
future street lots per Section 66477.2 of the Subdivision Map Act.
On February 6, 1990, Council adopted Ordinance 2357 approving the EastLake
Greens Development Agreement wherein the City made the Greens subject to City
adopted Quality of Life Thresholds and the Eastern Chula Vista Transportation
Phasing Plan Update and agreed to exempt the development from the Growth
1l-1
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date 6/18/91
Management Pl an as might be adopted in the future. An agreement regarding
publ ic use of the golf course was approved by Council on January 22, 1991 by
Resolution No. 16041. A supplemental subdivision agreement for this
subdivision provides that Lots 1 and 2 will be subject to that agreement to
satisfy Condition of Approval No. 80 of the tentative map. In satisfaction of
Condition of Approval No. 46, EastLake Development Company has, by letter
dated August 28, 1990, designated Parcel PQ-2 (4.8 acres) and a portion of
Parcel R-26 (2.2 acres) as church sites.
Condition No. 30 of the tentative map for this subdivision required that
EastLake agree that the City may withhold building permits for the subject
subdi vi si on if traffi c on Otay Lakes Road, Tel egraph Canyon Road, EastLake
Parkway, or East H Street exceed the level of service identified in the City's
adopted thresholds. Additionally, Tentative Map Condition of Approval No.
31(c) required the developer to agree to waive the right to protest the
format i on of any assessment di stri ct of the construction of street
improvements to connect Orange Avenue and Palomar Street to existing
improvements to the west of the subject property and to not protest inclusion
of the subject improvements as projects in the Eastern Territories Development
Impact Fee system.
The developer has executed a suppl ementa 1 subdi vi s i on agreement to sat i sfy
these requirements. Item I1.B on Page 4 of the supplemental subdivision
agreement has been an issue between the City Attorney and EastLake. The
stri cken words are those i nit i ally proposed by the City Attorney and whi ch
EastLake objected to including in the agreement. The City Attorney, for this
map only, is will ing to approve the agreement with the wording stricken
(please see Footnote 2 on Page 4 of said agreement for a full expl anation).
The de vel oper has also executed the subdi vi s i on improvement agreement and
provided appropriate bonds to guarantee construction of required
improvements. The final map and associated agreements are now before council
for approval. The developer has paid all applicable fees and complied with
all the conditions of approval of the Tentative Map.
A plat is available for Council viewing.
FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable.
WPC 5614E/0048Y
EAF:EY-330
\\- ~
II.S.A. ______
Cl.l.DlSF DRIVE .---- --Ii:\1a,--
Vl€lNITY HAP
IIfI <<IIU
IT" UIlD ..
IImME fIItIfr.
ell.._' ..
""fIItIfr.
mE
~
..aHSVIEJI
lit lVE
LOT 1
JCAI ~ : I' . 500'
1\-3
ONPANT
OIIIILA W.TA TIIACT.. ....
.A'TLAKE ...EIII , .
(al.) .1-cmJ7
1-.
../
4 ..
.'~ .
',f;
I .-. / .
.'
. .
( \
(
- ~
(~ViSed 7/25/89
..
)..00
RESOLUTION NO. 15t!1!!
(
RESOLUTION OF TIlE CITY CDUNCIL OF THE CITY OF 01lJIA VISTA
APPROVING TENTATIVE MAP FOR EA5TLAKE GREENS, 01lJIA VISTA
TAAcr 88-3
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby resolve as
follows: .
WHEREAS,. the proposed subdivision for the EastLake Greens area
encompasses 830 acres of land located in the eastern portion of the City of
Chula Vista east of I-80S and south of otay Lakes Road, and
WHEREAS, the subdivision includes streets, open space, church sites,
coJm1E!rcial lots, park sites, school sites, condominium lots and single-family
lots, and .
WHEREAS, the EnVironmental Impact Report, EIR-86-4 was considered
previously, and
WHEREAS, on June 21, 1989, the Planning Corroni.ssion, by a vote of
6-0, recorrmended that the Council approve the EastLake Greens. Tentative Map
subject to the following:
(,:
On an interim basis, Parcels R-24, R-25, R-26, R-27, and R-28 shall
be zoned at the target density of 4.5 dwelling units per acres. A maximum of
4,034 units will be approved for. EastLake II until such time as the
guidelines for exceeding the target density for the General Plan Update are
resolved. The fOllowing procedure will occur 'to determine additional
density, if any, for the EastLake project.
a. Specific guidelines for exceeding the target General Plan
density will be adopted;
b. The adopted General Plan policies will be applied to determine
the incremental units to be added to EastLake II.
c. The units from the new calculation will be distributed to these
five parcels or other unsubdivided portion of EastLake Greens
Tentative Map.
d. The SPA Plan and Tentative Map will be returned to the Planning
Corrmission and City Council for adoption of the increased
density, if any.
NaN, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Chula Vista does hereby approve the tentative map for EastLake Greens, Chula
Vista Tract 88-3, based on the findings set forth herein and subject to the
fOllowing conditions:
.'
Engineerino Department Conditions:
( 1.
.........
,
Public improvements required in this resolution shall include but not
. ,
be limited to: A.C. pavement and base, concrete curb, gutter and
-1-
ll-;f
" ' ,
. . "
J
.;
'(
C/'
( -' (
(
(
'sidewalk, traffic signals',-"street lights, traffic signs, street trees,
fire hydrants, sanitary sewers, water and drainage facilities.
-......,~, ..- ....... "'.... ~ .
"~-:-..._.., ..
All improveli1enES:':'shall De deSigned and constructed in accordance with
City'standards.
2.
The devel~r sha11be-responsible for:
,
a. The construction of public street improvements of all streets shown
on.:.~he'tentat;i ~~_~ thin-'-tne''Subdi vision;'~ :.3!'7.,-,,: '"
-:~=.:'::'~:~=7:- ::". ~:-~c;E' :-: _cr:: .:.:=~:.;:;:: : ... _."
- , .;:b; '.: "I'he '=~st:'rlietion ';,:of :-public ~ street., illlprovements for all off-site
portions of Otay Lakes Road, Hunte Parkway, Palomar Street and
Orange-o Aventles:al~t;.<tlie. full ~tength: -cf..:.the;~subject..; proti@rty. ~ ;Full
.c:),..,..::c: ~ioridtM, i~ov~ <srnnlbe'..,-reqai'rea- - 'Onless::- the' . developer" can
," demonstrate to the satisfaction of ,the City Engineer that' partial
improvements will meet the Cit@' standards for traffic, biCYCles,
pedestrians ana parking . Trailsi tions to eXisting improvements shall
'.,be prOvided as required by the City Engineer.
3.
a. The.' :developer.:shall guarantee' the. construction: of the -fOllOWing
':''=~.illl!-'Iovements: prior .tothe approval of the final map .for any of the
phases ~ 'of .' development identified in the EastLake Greens phaSing
plan. The developer may submit an alternate proposal to provide
access to any individual or group of phases identified herein. Said
,"'7.7'.: proposal.:-.shall ~-=be'.: '.$ubmi tted :.fo!:.. review. -:and '. 'approval by the City
.. :':~:El1gineer. ~ ,-- ...... . .., .,
."....." - .-.- - ~
:'"z,.. '.3., PhaSe~
~~:-:'.'. ,.....
- ."0'
- .... -. . .
~:'Fi6ntt:ieS'~d-':', *(See table I.~for' description. of
,":-~ 7" ':"=":_.0": -.---. each facility.)
-IA
\ IB
'\. IC
ID
2
3
,~,=. --1, 2~..".:io__::,_
-":.1, 3~.4;'8~15
1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 9, 13, 15
. '1, 2, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 13, 15
- '.1~~2,.6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 15
1, 2, 2a, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 14, 15
* Facilities that shall be guaranteed prior to approval of final
map for the corresponding phase and completed prior to permits
being issued for the subsequent phase (i.e., facilities for lA
through D completed before permits for Phase 2 are issued).
b. The developer shall guarantee the construction of all interior pUblic
improvements required for development of any uni t of development
prior to approval of the Final Subdivision Map for said unit.
4. Right turn lanes and dual left turn lanes shall be provided at the
intersection of any of the following street classifications: major-major,
major-prime arterial, prime arterial-prime arterial.
\
5. Palomar Street from the westerly subdivision boundary to EastLake Parkway
shall be constructed as a 4-lane collector (74 feet from curb-to-curb).
-2-
}(-5
..-
..
( -- (
(
(
(
6. NQ direct access- for res.ident~aJ,.~4ri_v:E!OoIaYs wU~ be allowed to Street, 'A',
EastLake Parkway, Hunte Parkway, Street 'E', 'D' Street, Street 'F', Otay
Lakes Road, Orange Avenue and Palomar Street. The location of street
~ie~jor ~ries_fOI;.RIlIlti-f-amily..projects to the- -above--streets
shall be approved by the City Engineer.
-V ~ fmnfage.. on - ~l~e-saG:.S--an.d knuckles shall not be less than 3S feet
unless approved by the City Engineer.
8. a.
~.~~s~~:~~ ~~t~~~imP~Qvements:is. required on Otay Lakes Road
east of-Hunte Parkway. Said transition shall be approved by the City
Engineer.-,: ~__ ,_. ~'_
b.
special ,treatment to transi~i9n .~-the prime arterial status of Hunte
park~~Y:~9ut~erly.of,said:intersection.
The:~infeciecti.on':,of - Hunte Parkway and Orange Avenue' shall require
. . - ',. , . . ,. h _'. 0"
. _.':--....-'":"-~ :,". -'"0'-'
-. ~ -. .-". -- ~
TABLE I
:~0~~!'T~.9! OtiSITE TRANSPORTATION FACILITIES
.'-:;:-:-0:
Facility N6'~'--
.:....:-:-~":::-.::.:-..~..; ::::-:'0: ~(";
(
01
0'--2' - r.:..~,
~:,,'.::::.', ')~"'-,.:.
. ~- ~Street
Portion
,EastLake Parkway,~.
-"'---.___~.': h.... .:',-.-:': ~. .
EastLake Parkway
.OtaYLakes Road to Street- 'E..
Street '0" to the Interim
- Terminus _ South of _ _ th~ _ .SDG&E
Easement
:.'G.'::_-::.-=..:~s .':~~':~"
2a
EastLake Parkway
Palomar Street to the Interim
Terminus South of the SDG&E
Easement
""
813
4
Street 0
North- Street "A"
North Street "A"
South Street "A"
Street "E"
Hunte Parkway
Hunte Parkway
Hunte Parkway
EastLake Parkway to North
Street "A"
r-
- ,5
'-/
Street "0" to Hunte Parkway
6*
Street "0" to Street "E"
/
'-J7
~:) 8
') 9
Street "0" to Hunte Parkway-
EastLake Parkway to Street "A"
Otay Lakes Road to South
Boundary of Phase lB
\.
10
Street "E" to North Boundary
of Phase Ie
Street "E" to South Street "A"
-3-
Jt..t"
11 Hunte Parkway South Street "A" to Orange
Avenue
12 Orange Avenue Hunte Parkway to West
Boundary of SUbdivision
13 street -E" street "A" to Hunte Parkway
14 palanar street EastLake parkway to west
Boundary of the Subdiv~sion
15 Otay Lakes Road Lane Avenue to Hunte Parkway
*
In cxmjunction with developnent at Phase lD, developer may construct
either that portion of South Street A to connect street QQ to Street "n"
or that portion to Hunte Parkway.
9.
Underground traffic signal equipment and traffic signal standards shall be
installed at the following intersections:
EastLake parkway and Otay Lakes Road
EastLake parkway and "n" Street
EastLake Parkway and "E" Street
EastLake Parkway and Palomar Street
Hunte Parkway and Otay Lakes Road
Hunte Parkway and north Street "A"
Hunte Parkway and "E" Street
Hunte Parkway and south Street "A"
Hunte parkway and orange Avenue
"E" Street and Street "A"
"n" Street and north Street "A".
Mast arms, signal heads and associated equipment shall not be installed
unless approved by the city Engineer.
10. Interconnect conduit, pull boxes and pullrope shall be installed to
connect following intersection signal systems.
Otay Lakes Road/Route 125 to Otay Lakes Road/EastLake Parkway
Otay Lakes Road/EastLake Parkway to Otay Lakes Road/Hunte Parkway
Otay Lakes Road/EastLake Parkway to EastLake Parkway/on" Street
EastLake Parkway/"n" Street to North Street "A" /"n" Street
EastLake parkway/"n" Street to EastLake Parkway/wE" Street
EastLake Parkway/wE" Street to EastLake Parkway/Palomar Street
Hunte Parkway/Otay Lakes Road to Hunte parkway!North Street "A"
Hunte Parkway/Street -A" to Hunte Parkway/wE" Street
EastLake Parkway/"E" Street to street "A rE" Street
Street "A"/"E" Street to Hunte Parkway/wE" street
Hunte Parkway/wE" Street to Hunte Parkway!North Street "A"
Hunte Parkway/South street "A" to Hunte Parkway/orange Avenue
Orange Avenue east of Hunte Parkway to subdivision boundary.
-4-
"-7
.
( _o(
(
(
11. a.
A conditional use permit shall be filed with the City for the golf
course, clubhouse, and related swimming and tennis facility prior to
issuance of building permits for purposes of regulating operations,
uses, and site design.
(
b.
Locations where golf course crossings of streets are prOvided shall
be clearly signed. and marked. Where streets being crossed are
classified to car traffic at a~ Speed greatcer chan ~:, mph, such
rOSS1n s 11 only be at intersect10ns or roug
- separation '6tJ01Cl:ur.es-.,~ . _ __ '_ _.
".J:.. ,....,:-..
c. The developer or other subsequent owner of the golf course shall
agree to be responsible for the payment to the City of ongOing repair
and maintenance costs of any grade separation structures which may be
--------c~ired for the benefit of the golf course.
- . - -. _.
d. Golf course safety features shall be reviewed by the City Engineer in
'~conjunction with :construction of the golf course.
12. All., streets - which ,intersect otoer streets at or near horizontal or
vertical 'curves 'mllst. meet intersection design sight distance requirements
in accordance with City standards.
13. a':;~'~ ~~~; ;~~~~:Wi~~':'cO~~ret~benches shall be provided along both sides of \
. Street "A" adjacent to the intersections with the following streets: ,
i:'c.:;~..stJ::eet.:. ,~E_~, Stre~t~. "G", . ,Street "D", Street "00" and Street. "FFF". I
'~'.-.~'BllS'~ turnouts shall- be. provided to the satisfaction of the City
: ':- ,.Engineer. '0
c.
!~";:;_~ ".i;=~:.-:' ,:..._ _ _..~ _".
1):.:~.':.-!Bus!St.oPs "wH~:ocQncrete~benches shall be provided along both sides of
'. : -,Runte Parkway adjacent to the intersections with Street "E" and south
--,. 'Street "A"; ---Bus Shelters as approved by the City Engineer shall be::
provided along both sides of EastLake Parkway adjacent to the;
intersection with Street "E" or appropriate alternative locations. "
...... '-
- . . -.
14.
Right turn lanes shall be provided on Street "A" at the intersections of
Street "A" with Street "D" and south Street "A" with Hunte Parkway. A
right turn lane shall be prOVided on EastLake Parkway at its intersection
with Street "E".
/15. a. All streets .within t.he !J1lllti-famiJy J~evelopments and. the.access....road
to-UiiIf' 29 shall be private. Detailed horizontal and VertiCal)
alignment of the centerline of said streets shall be reflected on the
improvement plans for said developments. Design of said streets
shall meet the City standards for private streets.
Private streets in Units I and 2 (single family detached units) shall
meet City standards for public streets or standards acceptable to the
City Engineer.
b.
"
(
c. All subdivisions proposing private streets with COntrolled access
devices, such as gates, shall contain the fOllOwing features:
-5-
)\- <?
'.
. ,
(.(
(
(
i.
(
(1) Gates shall be approved by the City Engineer. Gates shall be
.. ..' located to provide .sufficient room to queue up without
. -,. -, interruPting- traffic on pUblic streets.
::::-:!. :::":.: E:.:
(2) A turn around shall be provided at the location of the gate.
~:... ,..The size and .location of. said turn around shall be approved. by
.- ':. the Ci ty Engineer. . . ,
16. All the streets . shown . on the subject tentative 'map within the subdivision
boun~"::except as. described above, shall be dedicated for public use.
Detailed horizontal and vertical alignment for said streets' shall be
reflected on the improvements plans for the subject subdivision or any
unit ::thereof. - . Design: of. '.said . streets shall meet all City standards for
public streets. _
:i3) . .The border between public street and private street shall be
sE=~:~!ineate~~thr,ough the use of distinctive pavement.
'.(4) PrOVisions :shall be made for emergency vehicle access.
. --'-
(
17. ''lh~ ~owner. shall' grant. ,to .the City street tree planting and maintenance
.easements along .all public"streets within the Subdivision as shown on the
tentative mao. Said easement shall extend 10 feet from the back of the
sidewalk ,exCept: 'on'Hunte . Parkway and portions of EastLake Parkway as
provided 'below. " :Along Hunte' Parkway, said easement shall extend 10 feet
from ="the~.propertY;:.line and shall contain no Slope steeper .than-S.;J.
(hori'Zontal,:to'vertical ratio); . The entire area of said tree planting-
" easement along Hunte Parkway shall be offered for dedication on the
Cj-';i.. subeli vision maps for ,f1I.tlli:~ sfieef"plfr.P.9il_~~::- The. tree Planting easement
I :alonc:f.~those' POrtion5-0f:"EastUlk~' Parkway containing meandering' sidewalks
shall coincide . with .the proposed sidewalk easement as shown on the
Tentat.i.~11aPo~. ..... :"::.::.' =..' ...,:
-.. '"
18. The owner shall grant to the City a 10 .foot sidewalk easement adjacent to
the property line for the installation of a meandering sidewalk at the
following locations: .
a.' Otay Lakes Road along the full length of the frontage of Unit 17.
b. EastLake ParkWaY - along the frontilge of Units 29, 34 and 32 (north
of the intersection of "E" Street).
c. Street E
Between EastLake Parkway and Street - along the frontage of Unit
25.
Between Street A and Hunte parkway - along the frontage of Units
28, 29, 37 and 39.
19. Prior to the approval of any final map for subject SUbdivision or any unit
thereof, the subdivider shall obtain all off-site right-of-way necessary
~ for the installation of required improvements for that .unit.
-6-
l\- r
. .
(
.(
(
(
"
If the developer requests the City to use its powers to acquire said
off-site right-of-way, the developer. shall pay all costs, both direct and
indirect incurred' in said acquisition.
"c
20. The developer shall grant. to the City I' control lots adjacent to the
following streets: '"
a. South end of EastLake Parkway.
b. South. end .and east side of Hunte Parkway.'
c. Both ends of street A.
d. Both ends of Orange Avenue.
e. West end and southerly side 'of Palomar Street.
f. Both sides of Orange Avenue.
21. Striping plans shall be provided for the fOllOWing streets: Street "A",
Stree.t "D", Street "E", EastLake Parkway, Hunte Parkway, Orange Avenue,
Otay Lakes Road and Palomar street. Striping plans shall be approved in
conjunction with imprOVement plans for said streets.
~ Prior to 'the approval of any fin.:r subdivision map which includes a
V portion of;'. the streets . listed .below, the developer shall submit. plans
demonstrating the_feasibilitY~ofthe extension of the said streets:
.. ~ - .. ..
-.----...
- . .
-.....----. .
(
a.' " EastLake Parkway - from Palomar Street to Orange Avenue.
'b.' Hunte Parkway. -'from Otay Lakes Road to East "H" Street.
t:;: palumar'Street -. from the- subject sUbdivision'a minimum distance of
. ":".i',ooo ft; westerly.
d. ,. Orange Avenue:- ,a minimum distance of 1,000 ft. westerly.
-- . .
- . - ~ - .'. . . .
23. a.::-:: Tbe; .'lJeY.eloper-.' sball::,"Submi t calcula tions to demonstrate compliance
. . with all drainage requirements of the SUbdiViSion Manual to include,
but not be limited to, dry lane requirements. Calculations shall
also be provided to demonstrate the adequacy of downstream drainage
structures, pipes and inlets. . .
b. Specific methods of handling storm drainage are subject to detailed
approval by the City Engineer at the time of SubmiSSion of
improvement and grading plans. Design shall be accomplished on the
basis of the requirements of the Sllbdivision Manual and the Grading
Ordinance (#1797 as amended).
c. Graded access shall be provided to all storm drain structures
including inlet and outlet structures as required by the City
Engineer. Paved access shall be prOVided to drainage structures
located in the rear yard of any residential lot.
24. a. The develooer shall obtain notarized letters of permission for all
Off-Site g:ading work prior to issuance of grading permit for Work
requiring said off-site grading.
b, Lots shall be so graded as to drain to the street or to an approved
drainage system, Drainage shall not be permitted to fl~~ over slopes,
(
-7-
l\ - 10
(
c~
(
26.
/27.
I
! 28.
I
I
\
( --(
(
(
25. Sewer manholes: sbali~~'PFovided _at all changes of alignment and grade.
Sewers serving IO-or less equivalent dwelling units shall have a minimum
grade of 1%.
The developer shall comply with all relevant Federal, state and local
reguJ.ations-,:- including the Clean Water Act. The developer shall be
responsible for providing all required testing and documentation to
demonstrate said compliance as required by the City Engineer.
A: paved access road: with a' minimum width of 12 feet shall be provided to
all sanitary sewer manholes. The roadway shall be designed for an H-20
wheel' load or- other loading as approved by the Ci ty Engineer.
- -
The developer shall grant easements for all off-site public storm drains
and -sewer' facilities prior;1:o_ 'approval of any final map requiring those
fAr";" i:ties. Easements 'shall be a minimum width of six feet greater than
pipe size, but in no case, less than 10 feet.
. -..., .... ~." -.. - .
29. An erosion and sedimentation control plan shall be included as part of the
. grading plans.
~-- .. - ..-
. -- -." .
ilO. The-developer shall- :entez:. . into an agreement whereby the developer agrees
that the City may withhold bUilding permits for any units in the subject
subdi vision if traffic on Otay Lakes Road, Telegraph Canyon Road, EastLake
Parkway, or East "H". Street exceed ,the levels of service identified in the
CitY's':adopted:; thresholds.-. '" _.__ _'__
31. a..
r9
'--
32. a.
b)
"'..-
(Q
~.'
b.
The-~roperty owner-shall agree to not protest formation of a district
for the maintenance of the drainage channel in Telegraph Canyon.
. .
....-:; :-.:.....:..~~...=. - "__ -s..:"'7':': ~.
The propertY:owner shall: agree to not protest formation of a district
for: tbee maintenance of_.landscaped medians _ and parkways: _ along streets
within and-adjacent:to-,Xhe:Bubject pro~rty.
".- ...
The property owner shall enter into an agreement wherein he agrees to
not protest formation of an assessment district for the construction
of street imorovements to connect Orange Avenue and Palomar Street to
existing imorovements to the west of the subject property and to not
protest inclus:.on of the subject improvements as projects in the
Eastern Territories Development Im~act Fee system.
All sanitary sewer facilities required for development of any lot,
unit or phase shali be guaranteed prior to recordation of a
subdivision map for said lot, unit or phase.
The developer shall provide for the costs aSSociated with maintenance
of the sew~r pump stations prior to approval of any subdivision maps
which shall require said pump stations to prOvide sanitary sewer
service.
."
The developer shall obtain permission from the City to deposit sewage
in a foreign basin prior to approval of any subdivision map which
shall require any sewage to be transferred from an existing basin
-8-
1\ - II
(
-(
(
(
;'
x
. into another. hasin. - - The permission' . shall be in' the form of an
-,'~ agreement whereby.the City shall agree to such transfer, and the
--, - "developer shall agree to the construction of certain improvements in
the system that will accept said sewage and to the circumstances
',~ ~d~r _ whi~_ s~~~.. permission may be revok~.
......:0.....-... ._.. _., .._.... .... _ _. .
(
33. Prior' to the approval of any. final map for any lot or unit, the owner
shall' guarantee the' construction of all improvement (streets, sewers,
drainage, utilities, etc.) deemed necessary to provide service to such lot
or'tintt' in::at:oordaAce. with .-CitY-standards. __. ';._("' : _.., '
34. Prior to approval of any subdivision map for single family residential
uSe. The developer shall Submit a list of proposed lots indicating
whether the structure' 'will" be located on fill, cut,. or a' transition
between the. two- 51 tllatiOns.
. .
. ... - -- .. ...
-". ~- .....
- -- _. -. .
35.
SOIIt:h :Street. '"A" and' Street:' "E" (between Street "A" and Hunte Parkway)
shall be 52 feet wide (curb-to-curb) within 72 feet of right-of-way to
provide for on-street parking on one side of each street.
36. Off-site cumulative transportation impacts shall be mitigated to
inSignificant levels by participating in the East Chula Vista
'l!ransportation . Phasing. Plan ..on. a. fair share basis with other area
developers. .::. .:.~. - .
37.
EastLake :;C;feens:.:w:i:l-i. :be:O'subject to
regarding cable television.
any new City resolution or ordinance
(
-- - ..- .. ...
Planninq DeoartmenLCondltions_ . :.;, ___..._..
6Ya)
~plicant shall request the formation of an open space district.
Maintenance: a-f'''specific areas may be required to be performed by the
master homeowner's' association. Open space slopes shown adjacent to
public and private neighborhOO-d parks shall be included in the
established maintenance program.
b. Park dedication' and imorovement credit for private parks (up to 50%)
may be considered subj-ect to approval of improvements, park acreage
and activity areas provided.
t:l.
c. Develo;:ment of all public and private park areas receiving park
credit designated on the subdivision map shall be subject to the
approval of the City's Director of Parks and Recreation. Said
approval shall comply with the standards listed in Section 17.10.050
of the :~unicipal Code.
~aintenance and credit for the proposed Open space trail system shall
be sub:ect to approval of the Director of Parks and Recreation. The
trail shall consist of an approved D.G. base.
.-
e.
Park dedication credit for the corranunity park shall not include the
slope area adjacent to proposed #125; however, credit shall be given
when Dark imorovements in excess of the 11unicipal Code requirements
are provided:
l
-9-
" - 1.1.
. .
~.
.., t
(
(
" f. Any ~fees to be waived shall be done so upon completion of parks
or bOnded guarantees of park completion. Bonds provided to the
Department of Real' Estate may be SUfficient guarantee for private
park . improvements. ..
9. No waiver of Residential Construction Tax is made or implied by
:.::~ approval ot-this map.
39. Park acreage. of. 24 acres shall be provided subject to the approval of park
:iJnprovement"plallS-'by the- Director of Parks and Recreation.
40. The open space corridor encompassing the SDG&E easement and the San Diego
water line shall- be incorporated into adjacent land use plans as usable
open space and/or parking. The adjacent land use lots shall be graded to
aocomplish an acceptable interface.
,
\ 41. The 5:1 grading" shown on EastLake Parkway (reference sheet #2) shall be
,
. eliminated and shown as 3:1.' . .
.44,. A minimum 15 ft. wide landscaped area shall be provided between the
sidewalk and wall areas' created along single-family areas on Street "A".
NYI'E: Down slopes shall commence at a minimum distance of 10 ft. from the
Public sidewalk.' Alternate tree plantings in approved concrete cone root
containers will be considered for limited areas.
~3. CQPi$.oLproposed-CC&R's.shall be fi-led with the City.
44. A low and moderate income hOUSing program with an established goal of 5%
. - -. . low. and 5% moderate shall be implemented subject to the approval of the
""'-".:-=-. "'_.~-,_.,....~,....-_._--_..
City1s housing coordinator. NOTE: A 1% change resulting in 4% low and 6%
moderate' is deemed an acceptable tolerance. This condition shall be
deferred and'further':-eva!Uated: as- a"-factor: in .the analysis of the General
Plan density POlicies as they relate to parcels R-24, R-25, R-26, R-27,
and R-28.
45. All paved access to sewer and drainage outlets shall be subject to
approval by the Director of ' Planning.
~A minimum of three church sites totaling 7 acres shall be designated prior
to recordation of the final map.
/
'47. q:Jen space easements shown at the rear of various lots baCking onto the
golf course shall be included in the golf course maintenance program.
48. All lots adjacent to intersections subject to road Widening requirements
shall require further review by the Planning Director to determine
acceptabili ty.
~SchOOI development shall be phased to provide facilities with adequate
~~apacities to serve residential occupancy. MellO-Roos Community
Facilities District has been formed by the respective schOol districts.
I
I"
i
-10-
1\-13
",
~
")
....,
)
.
50. Provide street names on the tentative map~
(
51. A conceptual landscape" plan,. together with a water management plan, shall
be provided. prior. to City Council approval of the tentatiVe map and
Subject to the approval of City's Landscape Architect.
~ .
54.
55.
; 56.
,
i
I
l
57.
,.
( -. .
58.
59.
52. Development Of-aIl-parcels shall be in accordance with EastLake Greens SPA
Plan, Public Facilities Financing Plan and Design Manual.
53. -~":'developej:~-shaH ->annex-~ail- areas - within" the--subdivision boundaries
prior to recordation of any final map.
...... '.
The phaSing plan shall--be designed _to connect. interior subdivisions within
Phase I to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
All lots without apprOved private Or pUblic access shall be snown as a
single lot.
The open space shown adjacent to easterly side of Route 125 corridor shall
be dedicated to the City across its entirety for future transfer to the
State. of California as part. - of _ :futur.e~o" .fr~ay. right-:Of-way~.- _ _ School
District has option of Putting in retaining wall across the high school
site. _
Lotting approval for Unit 14 shall be continued Until a precise plan
.detailing .thedesign of the..project is reviewed by the Design Review
COmmittee. Thereafter, the lotting of Unit 14 will be considered by the
Ci~y Council .f~r .tentative subdivision map approval.
Orange Avenue corridor design shall be subject to approval of the Director
of Planning regarding grading, slope grading, landscaping and fenCing.
"':"'--:"" .::' -~:-.:': ::'::""-:-.:< ;':"::._.:c.__'::~ ?-; ": :".:::"
All lots in Units 4, 7, and 8 shall be a minimum of 50 feet wide and 20%
of lots in Units 11 and 13 shall be a minimum of 50 feet wide.
A minimum of twenty (20) percent of all lots within Units 4, 7, and 8, 11,
and 13 are intended to aCcommodate one-story units or units with a
one-story plateline along the street frontage. Said one-story units shall
be placed on lots with a minimum width of 50 feet.
-
Any units displaced as a result of revision to the subdivision may be
considered for transfer to another unit within EastLake Greens.
60. ;~jor entry points to the EastLake Greens development shall require
a~~roval of the Director of Planning with respect to grading, slope
gradient and landscaping.
61. .rill of the Open space lots shall be dimensioned (see Loop Street ~A'
adjacent to Uni ts 14, 39 and 13). "
62. Open s~ce lots adjacent to private parks shall be included in the private
~arks to be maintained by the Homeowners' ASSOCiation.
--
-11-
\ \-''7
.
(
(
(
(
. f!J
( . ,
64.
)...Water .agreement with otay Municipal Water District regarding terminal
storage and water suPply shall be required prior to approval of the final
IIBp.
A pedestnan bridge or an alternative acceptable to the City Engineer
shall be constructed over Otay Lakes Road to connect the community trail
ftom EastLake r to EaStLake II.
EIR Mitigation Measures - Planning
.;,!:-:- ~"="',-,:, ~
..:......:;
~-:-_.';I":' ". - _....
e..-_... ":'" ~_ _..............
65. Residential land uses planned adjacent to or near commercial and
industrial uses shall be adequately buffered. Necessary measures will
include' a" wall or. fence to decrease' noise and increase privacy; a
physical, vertieal or horizontal separation between land uses, i.e., a
road, slopes or a landscaped open space buffer; or some type of vegetative
screen. Impacts OCcurring as a result of. site-specific designs will be
mitigated on a site-specific basis. (pg. 4-15)
66. In order to mitigate the site specific impacts, the fOllOWing must be
COmpleted in accordance with the thresholds policy and the East Chula
Vista TranspOrtation Phasing Plan:
a.. Improve Telegraph Canyon Road between State Route 125 and the
EastLake Greens/rrails boundary to siX-lane prime arterial standards.
(
6~~~.E:onstruct P.'ente Parkway aR~" EastLake Parkway as major roads between
.'.'. Telegraph Canyon Road and Orange Avenue.
c. Construction of a southbound State Route 125 to eastbound Telegraph
Canyon Road loop ramp at the State Route l25/relegraph Canyon Road
intersection or extend State Route 125 South to East Palomar Street
(which would Connect to the EastLake II street
-.,. . system). 0 ."--. (pg. '4-37)
67. The on-site water storage tank shall receive additional landscaping. This
shall include the use of additional vegetation within the site compound to
obscure the tank itself, as well as exterior landscaping of the perimeter
fence to provide a more aesthetic screen.
68. Residential units in the vicinity of the SDG&E transmission line shall be
spaced and orie:Jted to minimize views of those facilities. The 50-foot
buffer along bot~ sides of the roadway traversing the northern site
boundary shall receive sufficient landscaping to effectively screen
development associated with EastLake 1. Additionally, residential units
in the northern project site shall be spaced and oriented to minimize
views to the north where appropriate.
69. A preliminary geoteChnical report has been prepared for the EastLake
Greens pro!Jerty by San Diego Soils Engineering, Inc. (986). This report
contains various recommendations to provide adequate Surface and
subsurface drainage and erosion control that shall be incorporated into
the project design. Recommended measures include, but are not limited to,
~ the following:
-12-
\ \ - }5
. .
{ _.(
(
(
.
(
.., Surface and Subsurface Drainaqe: Surface runoff into downslope
natural areas and graded areas should be minimized. Where possible,
drainage should be directed to suitable disposal areas via non erosive
devices (i.e., paved swales and storm drains).
Pad drainage .should be designed to.collect and direct surface waters
'''', away from proposed structures to approved drainage facilities. For
earth areas, a minill1l.D11 gradient of two percent should be maintained
.. and drainage. should be directed toward approved swales or drainage
raclIIcles. l)ralna~tterns approved at the time of fine grading
should be maintained throughout the life of proposed structures..
70. Subdrains shall be placed under all fill located in eXisting drainage
eollIOSE1~, at ..i,dentified or pGtential.. .seepage areas. Specific locations
shall be. evaluated in the field during grading with general subdrain
locat;ions . indicated on the approved grading plan. The' sUbdrain
installation shall be reviewed by the engineering geOlogist prior to fill
placement.
71. Drainage devices are required behind stabilization fills to minimize the
build-up.. of... hydrostatic. and/or seepage forces. (See Preliminary
Geotechnical Investigations, San Diego Soils Engineering, . Inc. (1986) for
details and reconmended locations of these backdrains.) Depending on
slope height, at least one tier of drains would be required for
approximately every 30 feet of slope height. Drains may also be needed at
contacts between permeable and non-permeable formations.
(
72. Slopes shall be planted with appropriate drought-resistant vegetation as
recommende~ by a landscape architect immediately fOllOwing grading.
Erosion control and drainage devices shall be installed in compliance with
the requirements of the City of Chula Vista.
73. Water. shah not be' allowed"to run over the top of or flow down graded or
natural slopes.
74. Devices constructed to drain and protect slopes, including brow ditches,
berms, retention basins, terrace drains (if utilized) and down drains
shall be maintained regularly, and in partiCUlar, should not be allowed to
clog '50 that water can flow unchecked over slope faces. Subdrain outlets
shall be maintained to prevent burial o~ other blockage.
75. To ensure that significant and potentially unique fossils and
paleontological resources are not destroyed without examination and
analysis, it shall be required that a qualified paleontologist monitor the
initial grading activities during development of the EastLake Greens site.
76. a.
Halls and/or berms shall be installed to the satisfaction of the
Director of Planning to reduce noise exposure to acceptable levels
onsite.
.'
l
The applicant has proposed an optional 5-foot fence enclosing the
perimeter of the residential boundary (Figure 2-10), and the 5-foot
wall height was factored into the model to analyze the effectiveness
-13-
ll- )~
. .
((
((
((
((
".
d.
The SPA Plan and Tentative Map
Commission and City Oouncil
density, if any.
will be returned to the Planning
for adoption of the increased
{
78. Prior to the recordation of the final map, the EastLake I private park
agreement- shall.be approved :by .the City. Council.
79. The EastLake Greens Development Agreement shall contain a provision
making the EastLake Greens project subject to the Transportation
Phasing' Plan'and the-.<Gcowth'Management- Element: of the- General Plan.~'" .
80. Prior to recordation of the final map, the applicant shall submit an
agreement to. the City regarding public use of the golf course... This
may' -be'addressed in the conditional use permit required for the golf
course.
81. The Planning Oommission recommendation regarding the reduction of
dwelling units contained in Condition 13 of the EastLake II General
Development Plan is incorporated into this resolution (EastLake Greens
reduced from 3609 dwelling units to 2774 dwelling units).
FINDINGS:
.".
'i.
\..
Pursuant to Section 66473.5 of the SUbdivision Map Act, Tentative
Subdivision Map for EastLake Greens Tract 88-3 is found to be consistent
with. the .Chula Vista General Plan as adopted by the Chula Vista City
Council based on the following findings:
1. Land Use Element
The General Plan designates the EastLake Greens areas for LOw-Medium
Residential as well as commercial, public, quasi-public (schools,
parks, churches) and some open space. The recommended 2,774
residential units is within the density (between target and maximum)
range of the General Plan residential designation of low/medium
residential (3-6. du/gr. ac.), inclUding density transfers from the
park, school, and golf course to the residential area (327 du).
2. Circulation Element
All of the on-site and off-site public streets required to serve the
subdivision will be constructed or DIF fees paid by the developer in
accordance with the EastLake Greens Public Facilities Financing Plan
and Development Agreement.
l
3. Housing Element
The proposed project will provide a minimum of 10%
housing including a mix of housing types and lot
single-family, townhouses, condominium and various
densi ties that will provide a wide spectrum of housing
persons of various incomes.
affordable
sizes for
apartment
pr ices for
.'
-15-
H-17
.'
(
(
(
(
'(
of such a wall on the si9!!ilicant noise impacts projected onsite. In
some cases, a S::foot-.walL:height was determined not to be required
and a lower wall height was evaluated.
It was determined that a 5-foot barrier along the top of slope on
. portio!ls..of.the eastern :side 'of EastLake Parkway and portions of the
in~erna~loop. road, and contiguous to the northern and southern entry
roads, would reduce projected onsite noise levels below 65dB(A)OIEL
(Figure -4-17). A 3-foot barrier would also be required along .the
central: golf Course--road:' to' further' attenuate onsite noise levels.
Noise levels at the park could be reduced through the incorporation
of barriers of minimal height (Le., 1 to 2 feet). Walls are not
recommended because of aesthetic considerations and because the
attenuation required is Only two decibels. Attenuation at the park
could be achieved by raising the pad elevations near the contributing
roadways by. 2 feet instead of incorporating a barrier. The barriers
along residential portions of the site should consist of walls, earth
berms, or a combination of walls and berms. Noise levels above 65
dB(A) and below 75 dB(A) CNEL' are considered compatible with the
proposed commercial area in the northwest corner of the project area
. . and no barriers are required to attenuate the noise levels in this
area of the site.
. -. ...- ':," .
~
Based :011 the. current grading plan, the identified noise walls would
mitigate the projected exterior noise levels below the required 65
..::,r;:.:a.EL' standard',and:;.to: a.:leveL~f insignificance with the exception of
the park where slight exceedances would occur. If the pad elevation
is raised, as' recommended, no adverse noise impacts would occur
. ". onsite.
'b. For. those portions of the site exposed to 60 CNEL or greater
(identified in Figure 4-17), an interior acoustical analysis will be
~ required once building plans and site plans are - made available to
-.ensure the use of appropriate construction materials to attenuate the
interior noise levels below a level of significance.
77. On an interim basis; Parcels R-24; R-25, R-26, R-27, and R-28 shall be
zoned at the target density of 4.5 dwelling units per acres. A maximum of
4,034 units will be approved for EastLake II until such time as the
guidelines for exceeding the target density for the General Plan Update
are resolved. The fOllowing procedure will occur to determine additional
density, if any, for the EastLake project.
a. Specific guidelines for exceeding the target General Plan
density will be adopted;
b. The adopted General Plan poliCies will be applied to determine
the incremental units to be added to EastLake II.
,-
l
c. The units from the new calculation will be distributed to these
five parcels or other unsubdivided portion of EastLake Greens
Tentative Map.
-14-
\\ - let'
.
. ,
(
(
(
'-
(
;,
4. Parks and Recreation Element
The subdivision will provide approximately 40 acres of improved
COImlUnity and neighborhood parks in a=ordance with locations and
standards of the General Plan. The required park acreage for
- >;:East~e ,Greens-is 29.2 acres.
c
5. Public'Facilities Element
,..-E<The -project _-is ""obligated-"111 the conditions of approval to
participate in providing the water faCilities, wastewater facilities
and drainage facilities required by the POlicies of the General
. ",Plan. These include emergency water storage reservoir, construction
of a,50 million gallon facility by OMWD, prOVisions for additional
wastewater facilities by parallel sewer pipelines and constructing
on-site detention basins to reduce peak storm flows. .
6. ,Open Space and Conservation Element
The proposed subdivision is in conformance with the goals and
POlicies of the element. There are no land resources, water
resources, plant or animal resources or open space areas identified
for preservation in the General Plan for this site.
7.
(
Safety Element
The project site is considered a seismically actiVe area, although
there are no known active faults on or adjacent to the property.
The fire orotection facilities and services needed to serve the
project have been reviewed by the Fire Department. Other emergency
service agencies have reviewed the proposed subdivision for
conformance with safety policy. The project will increase the need
for additional police and fire personnel, however, the City is
planning to meet the need with additional revenues provided by the
project.
Pursuant to Section 66412.3 of the SUbdiVision Map Act, th~ effects of
the tentative "ap for EastLake Greens Tract 88-3 on the housing needs of
the region has been considered in th'it the subdivision will prOVide a
variety of hOUSing types that will serve all aspects of the community.
The COuncil has further balanced the need for housing against public
service needs of its residents and available fiscal and environmental
resources in that the City has weighed the fiscal effects of the. project
and finds that it will not deplete CUrrent resources and has further
balanced the environmental effects by incorporating mitigation measures.
Pursuant to Section 66473.1 of the SUbdiVision 1'~3p Act, the EastLake
Greens Tract 88-3 has provided to the extent feasible for future passive
or natural heating or cooling OPPOrtunities in that the proposed design
has a predominant north-south orientation of long, narrow parcels
.'
l
-16-
ll- I?
.'
.. - .-
(,
(
I
'-
. .
(
.. of
(
c
(
encouraging east-west orientation of bUildings and creating southern
exposure for pitched longitudinal roofs to facilitate solar energy.
Presented by
~~._'-:;".':':~ ...: '::!"":"....
crJt~~~~~~
ge Krempl Direc of
Plannng
5930a
~
_"0; .
Approved as to form by
.'
-17-
\I - -U>
RESOLUTION NO.~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE FINAL MAP OF CHULA
VISTA TRACT 88-3, EASTLAKE GREENS PHASE lD,
UNITS 25 AND 40, REJECTING ON BEHALF OF THE
PUBLIC THOSE PORTIONS OF LOTS 1 AND 2 MARKED
"RESERVED FOR FUTURE STREET" GRANTED ON SAID
MAP, ACCEPTING ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA THE EASEMENTS GRANTED ON SAID MAP WITHIN
SAID SUBDIVISION, AND APPROVING THE
SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE
COMPLETION OF IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED BY SAID
SUBDIVISION, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO
EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT
The City Council of the City of chula vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula vista hereby finds that that certain map survey
entitled CHULA VISTA TRACT 88-3, EASTLAKE GREENS PHASE lD, Units
24 and 40, and more particularly described as follows:
Being a subdivision of a portion of Section 3, Township
18 South, Range 1 West, San Bernardino Meridian,
according to united States Government Survey, together
with a portion of Rancho Janal, according to Map thereof
recorded in Book 1, Page 89 of Patents, records of San
Diego County, all in the City of Chula Vista, County of
San Diego, state of California.
Area: 65.902 Acres
Numbered Lots: 87
No. of Lots: 3
is made in the manner and form prescribed by law and conforms to
the surrounding surveys; and that said map and subdivision of
land shown thereon is hereby approved and accepted.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that portions of Lots 1 and 2 are
hereby rejected for future street purposes.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said Council hereby accepts
on behalf of the City of Chula vista the easements with the right
of ingress and egress for street tree planting and maintenance
and construction and maintenance of sewer and drainage
facilities, all as granted and shown on said map within said
subdivision, subject to the conditions set forth thereon.
II~ -I
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Clerk of the City
of Chula Vista be, and she is hereby authorized and directed to
endorse upon said map the action of said Council; that said
Council has approved said subdivision map, that said lots are
rejected for future street purposes, and that those certain
easements with the right of ingress and egress for the
construction and maintenance of street tree planting and sewer
and drainage facilities, as granted thereon and shown on said map
within said subdivision is accepted on behalf of the City of
Chula Vista as hereinabove stated.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED tha t the Ci ty Clerk be, and she
is hereby directed to transmit said map to the Clerk of the Board
of Supervisors of the County of San Diego.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that that certain Subdivision
Improvement Agreement for Chula vista Tract 88-3, EASTLAKE GREENS
PHASE lD, units 25 and 40, a copy of which is on file in the
office of the City Clerk, is hereby approved.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of
Chula vista is authorized and directed to execute said Agreement
for and on behalf of the City of Chula vista.
Presented by
ed
J to "1)
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
8930a
Bruce M. Boogaa d City Attorney
IIA'i.-
Recording Requested by:
CITY CLERK
When Recorded, Mail to:
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, Ca. 91910
No transfer tax is due as this
is a conveyance to a public
agency of less than a fee
interest for which no cash
consideration has been paid or
received.
Declarant
SUPPLEMENTAL SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
CHULA VISTA TRACT 88-3
EastLake Greens Phase 10, Units 25 & 40
Regarding Condition Nos. 30, 31 (b), 31(c) and 80
This Agreement is made this 18th day of June, 1991, by and
between THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, California ("Chula vista" or
"Grantee" for recording purposes only) and WESTERN SALT COMPANY, a
California Corporation, and EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a
California General PartnerShip (both of which entities are herein
referred to as "EastLake" or "Grantor" for recording purposes
only), and is made with reference to the following facts:
R E C I TAL S
A. This Agreement concerns and affects the Property legally
described as Lot 1 (part of Unit 40, Tentative Map), Lot 2 (part of
Unit 40, Tentative Map) and Lot 3 (Unit 25, Tentative Map) of
Subdivision Map No. , filed in the County Recorder's Office
of the County of San Diego, on June , 1991, File No. ,
("Property"), and is commonly known as the real property which is
the subject matter of the EastLake Greens Phase 10, Units 25 and 40
Tentative Map.'
1. Filing instructions to the Title Company should include
insertion of info to complete this section.
ssia-EL2.wp
June 11, 1991
SSIA re Phase ID, Units 25 & 40
Page 1
1
11f} -",
B. EastLake is the owner of the Property; and,
C. EastLake has applied for and obtained a tentative map
("Tentative Map") and has thereby obtained City approval to sub-
divide a parcel of land of which the Property is a part, subject to
certain requirements and conditions, as contained in Resolution No.
15200, approved on July 25, 1989; and,
O. EastLake has prepared and has submitted to the City the
Final Map for Chula Vista Tract 88-3, Phase 10, units 25 and 40.
E. City has adopted City-wide "thresholds", as established by
City Resolution No. 13346, as same may be, from time to time,
amended by the city ("Quality of Life Thresholds" or "Thresholds").
These Thresholds establish performance and "quality of life"
standards for a variety of services and impacts which must be in
existence or met by the Project as a condition of permitting the
Project to be built. The Thresholds were incorporated as
conditions of Project approvals by City.
F. In addition to the Thresholds, and as a mechanism to
insure compliance therewith, the City has adopted the Eastern Chula
vista Transportation Phasing Plan ("Phasing Plan"). The Phasing
Plan provides that certain transportation facilities have to be in
existence or provided by the Project as conditions of permitting
the Project to be built.
G. The Thresholds and the Phasing Plan establish standards
and levels of service for various identified public facilities and
resources. These standards and levels of service are enforced
through the withholding of building permits when the public
facility or resource drops below a specified threshold.
H. One of the conditions of approval of the Tentative Map fdr
Chula vista Tract 88-3 requires EastLake to enter into an agreement
whereby the EastLake promises that the city may withhold building
permits for any units in the subject subdivision if traffic on Otay
Lakes Road, Telegraph Canyon Road, EastLake Parkway, or East "H"
street exceed the levels of service identified in the city's
adopted Thresholds. (Condition 30)
1. One of the conditions of approval of the Tentative Map for
Chula Vista Tract 88-3 requires EastLake to enter into an agreement
whereby EastLake promises to not protest formation of a district
for the maintenance of landscaped medians and parkways along
streets within and adjacent to the subject property. (Condition
No. 31 (b) )
J. One of the conditions of approval of the Tentative Map for
ssia-EL2.wp
June 11, 1991
SSIA re Phase 10, Units 25 & 40
Page 2
1J(t - 'I'
Chula vista Tract 88-3 requires EastLake to enter into an agreement
whereby EastLake promises to not protest formation of an assessment
district for the construction of street improvements to connect
Orange Avenue and Palomar street to existing improvements to the
west of the subject property and to not protest inclusion of the
subject improvements as projects in the Eastern Territories
Development Xmpact Fee system. (Condition No. 3l(C))
K. One of the conditions of approval of the Tentative Map for
Chula vista Tract 88-3 requires EastLake to submit an agreement to
Chula vista regarding public use of the Golf Course prior the
recordation of any final map (Condition 80); and,
NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
I. Aareement Aoolicable to Subseauent Owners.
A. Aareement Bindina Uoon Successors. This Agreement shall
be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors, assigns
and interests of the Parties as to any or all of the Property until
released by the mutual consent of the parties.
B. Aareement Runs with the Land. The burden of the covenants
contained in this Agreement ("Burden") is for the benefit of the
land owned by the City adjacent to the Property. The Burden
touches and concerns the Property. It is the intent of the
parties, and the parties agree, that this covenant shall be binding
upon, and run with, the ownership of the land which it burdens.
II. Buildina Permits Not to Issue While Thresholds Deficient
(Condition 30\.
A. EastLake hereby grants to the city the right to withhold
building permits for any improvements on the subject Property at
such time as anyone of the following occur:
1. The public facilities monitoring program as provided
for in the Eastlake II Public Facilities Financing Plan
("PFFP") for the Project indicates that required
facilities as identified in the PFFP or any revisions
thereto have not been provided, as determined by the City
Engineer and Director of Planning.
2. Traffic volumes, levels of service, utilities and/or
services exceed the adopted City threshold standards,
including, but not limited to, those for East "R" street,
Otay Lakes Road, Telegraph Canyon Road, or EastLake
Parkway. .
ssia-EL2.wp
June 11, 1991
SSIA re Phase 10, Units 25 & 40
Page 3
~
/I 1=1 It_
3. Regional development threshold limits set by the
Phasing Plan have been reached.
The foregoing three conditions shall herein be referred to as
"Conditions for Withholding of Building Permits."
B. EastLake hereby agrees to not "pUll", and City will not
issue, building permits, aRa te Ret eeRetruet aRY f~rther
reSiS&llt.ial s'tr\letaree aft ~fte slisjeet. Prepert.y SE' a:Flj. part.ieR
tkereef if anyone of the Conditions for Withholding of Building
Permits occur, exeep~ fer strast\lres fer ~~ieB sliilaiftg permit.a
ha~e seeR lasses whish are liftSer eeftatr\ie~ieR at. the ~ime that. a
SeRditieft fer Wi~hheldift' sf B1.:111d1R' Permi~a arises.2
2. The stricken language was originally proposed by the City
Attorney.
The paragraph, as stricken,
Approval of the agreement as marked
approval of the EastLake version.
is acceptable to EastLake.
for deletions will constitute
The City Attorney is willing, for this Final Map only, to
approve the EastLake version. Public Works concurs. Planning is
still evaluating.
This is a relatively small final map territory, which is
planned for 40 units (and which is the subject matter of a density
change request to 70 units). The city Attorney's recommendation in
this limited instance only is based on the fact that (1) the city
Attorney's proposed agreement is a relatively new concept and
something of a surprise to EastLake (Baldwin concurred in the City
Attorney's language on a recent Salt Creek/FNP Final Map), and (2)
EastLake contends that they have a pending sale of the golf course.
A proposed alternative ("Estimation Entitlement Language") for
future agreements could be worded as follows, which similarly
protects the City to a level satisfactory to the City Attorney.
"EastLake hereby agrees to not "pull", and City will not
issue, building permits if anyone of the Conditions for
Withholding of Building Permits occur, or are estimated by the
City, in its judgement, reasonably exercised, using industry-
approved planning projection standards, to occur as a result
of development and occupancy of the Property or of other
property for which final maps have been approved."
EastLake has agreed to support further workshops and
discussions on this issue.
ssia-EL2.wp
June 11, 1991
SSIA re Phase 1D, Units 25 & 40
Page 4
~
llfi~~
C. EastLake further waives any objection to the authority of
the City to exercise its right herein granted to withhold building
permits, and acknowledges the authority of the City to exercise the
right herein granted. EastLake furthermore acknowledges that the
exclusive remedy to seek redress for the imposition of any
conditions which they deem to be improper or in excess of the
authority of the City to impose is by administrative mandamus.
D. City agrees that the execution of this Agreement fulfills
EastLake's obligations relating to Conditions of Approval No. 30 of
the Tentative Map as it applies to Property. Even though
Transportation Facilites Nos. 6 (South Greensview Drive) and 10
(Hunte Parkway between Clubhouse Drive and South Greensview Drive),
as idenitified in Condition No. 3 of Tentative Map Resolution No.
15200 have not been completed as required to prosecute any part of
Phase 10 to final map, since this subdivision is not immediately
going to result in residential lots without further division, the
parties agree that EastLake's obligation to complete this condition
is hereby deferred until the further division of the Property or
any remaining portion of the Tentative Map.
III. Cost of Landscaoe Maintenance (Condition 31b).
A. EastLake hereby agrees to not protest the formation of a
landscape maintenance district for the maintenance of medians and
parkways along streets within and adjacent to the subject Property
and to not oppose the inclusion of the Property within said
landscape maintenance district. This agreement to not protest the
inclusion of these public improvements shall not be deemed a waiver
of the right to challenge the amount of any additional assessment
which may be imposed due to the addition of these new improvements
and shall not interfere with the right of any person to vote in a
secret ballot election.
B. EastLake hereby agrees to pay to the City all costs
incurred by the City, including staff time plus overhead and
consultant costs, in the formation of the landscape maintenance
district. EastLake further agrees to deposit in advance such sums
as the City shall require to prosecute the formation of said
district, and agrees to execute all documents necessary to achieve
the formation of said district as the city shall require.
C. city agrees that the execution of this Agreement fulfills
EastLake's obligation to Condition 31b of Chula vista Tract 88-3 as
it applies to Property.
ssia-EL2.wp
June 11, 1991
SSIA re Phase 10, Units 25 & 40
Page 5
II it...._
IV. Formation of Assessment District (Condition 31c).
A. EastLake hereby promises to not protest formation of an
assessment district which includes the Property for the
construction of street improvements to connect Orange Avenue and
Palomar street to existing improvements to the west of the subject
property and to not protest inclusion of the subject improvements
as projects in the Eastern Territories Development Impact Fee
system.
B. City agrees that the execution of this Agreement fulfills
EastLake's obligation regarding Condition 31c of the Tentative Map
as it applies to Property.
V. Includina Unit 40 in Golf Course Aareement Leaal (Condition
llt.
A. The Parties agree that the agreement between themselves,
entitled "Supplemental Subdivision Improvement Agreement Regarding
Condition No. 80.", dated January 22, 1991 for the purposes of
reference, is hereby amended in the following respects only, and as
amended, continues to remain in full force and effect: Exhibit A,
entitled "Legal Description of golf Course Lots", shall now read as
follows:
"Lots 6, 9, 12 and 17 in the City of Chula Vista, County of
San Diego, State of California according to map thereof No.
12545 filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego
County January 26, 1990; and,
Lot 1 & 2 in the City of Chula Vista, County of San Diego~
State of California according to map thereof No.
filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego County
4
B. City agrees that the execution of this Agreement fulfills
EastLake's obligation regarding Condition 80 of the Tentative Map,
as it applies to this Property.
VI. Gradina Indemnities.
A. EastLake hereby agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold the
City harmless from any liability due to erosion, siltation or
increased flow of drainage resulting from the construction of the
3. Title Company to insert info on recording.
4. Title Company to add date of recording.
ssia-EL2.wp
June 11, 1991
SSIA re Phase 10, Units 25 & 40
Page 6
IlJi-_~
improvements associated with the final maps for the subject
Property.
VII. Miscellaneous.
3. Notices. Unless otherwise provided in this Agreement or
by law, any and all notices required or permitted by this Agreement
or by law to be served on or delivered to either party shall be in
writing and shall be deemed duly served, delivered, and received
when personally delivered to the party to whom it is directed, or
in lieu thereof, when three (3) business days have elapsed
following deposit in the u.s. mail, certified or registered mail,
return receipt requested, first-class postage prepaid, addressed to
the address indicated in this Agreement. A party may change such
address for the purpose of this paragraph by giving written notice
of such change to the other party. Facsimile transmission shall
constitute personal delivery.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
276 4th Ave.
Chula Vista, CA 92010
Attn: Engineering Department
EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
900 Lane Avenue, Suite 100
Chula Vista, Ca. 92013
A party may change such address for the purpose of this
paragraph by giving written notice of such change to the other
party in the manner provided in this paragraph. Facsimile
transmission shall constitute personal delivery.
4. Caotions. captions in this Agreement are inserted for
convenience of reference and do not define, describe or limit the
scope or intent of this Agreement or any of its terms.
5. Entire Aqreement. This Agreement contains the entire
agreement between the parties regarding the subject matter hereof.
Any prior oral or written representations, agreements,
understandings, and/or statements shall be of no force and effect.
This Agreement is not intended to supercede or amend any other
agreement between the parties unless expressly noted. This
includes, but is not limited to the "Development Agreement by and
between EastLake Development Company, Developer, and City of CHula
Vista, City".
6. PreDaration of Aqreement. No inference,
presumption shall be drawn from the fact that a
attorney prepared and/or drafted this Agreement.
assumption or
party or his
It shall be
ssia-EL2.wp
June 11, 1991
SSIA re Phase 10, Units 25 & 40
Page 7
1111 -~ q
conclusively presumed that both parties participated equally in the
preparation and/or drafting this Agreement.
7. Reci tals: Exhibits. Any recitals set forth above are
incorporated by reference into this Agreement.
8. Attornevs' Fees. In the event of any dispute arising out
of this Agreement, the prevailing party in any action shall be
entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees in addition to any other
costs, damages, or remedies.
ssia-EL2.wp
June 11, 1991
SSIA re Phase 10, units 25 & 40
Page 8
llR-flD
Signature Page to
Supplemental Subdivision Improvement Agreement
EastLake Greens Phase 10, units 25 & 40
Regarding Condition Nos. 30, 31(b) and 31 (c)
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this
Agreement to be effective as of the day and year first hereinabove
set forth.
Dated:
, 1991
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
By:
Leonard M. Moore,
its Mayor Pro Tem
Attest:
Beverly Authelet, City Clerk
Approved as to Form:
Bruce M. Boogaard, City Attorney
Dated:
, 1991
EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a
California general partnership
comprised of corporations,
By: Daniel V. Inc., a California
corporation, General Partner
By:
Robert Santos,
t.J President
~~'fel V, Inc., a California
Corporation, General Partner
its
Vice
By:
By:
Robert Santos,
President
its
Vice
Dated:
, 1991 WESTERN SALT COMPANY, a California
Corporation
By:
Henry F. Hunt, President
ssia-EL2.wp
June 11, 1991
SSIA re Phase 10, Units 25 & 40
page 9
/lP-I;.-, I
Signature Page to
Supplemental Subdivision Improvement Agreement
EastLake Greens Phase lD, Units 25 & 40
Regarding Conditions Nos. 30, 31(b) and 31(c)
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this
Agreement to be effective as of the day and year first
hereinabove set forth.
Dated:
, 1991
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
By:
Leonard M. Moore
its Mayor Pro Tem
~.d::._'" . __ ..-
Attest:
Beverly Authelet, City Clerk
Approved as to Form:
Bruce M. Boogaard, city Attorney
Dated:
, 1991
EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a
California general partnership
comprised of corporations,
By: DANIEL V,
corporati /'
By:
INC. a California
eneral Partner
",
a California
Cl-l Partner
,......---
~. . ,0
By:
..:7,
Dated:
J~Y7e.
lL, 1991
WESTERN SALT COMP Y, a California
co~
By' . '/t-.--
It~. ~'D~
Page 10
/lA-_,~
RESOLUTION NO.~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING SUPPLEMENTAL AGREEMENT
WITH THE DEVELOPER OF EASTLAKE GREENS PHASE
lD, UNITS 25 AND 40 NEEDED TO SATISFY
TENTATIVE MAP CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL NO. 30,
3l(b), 3l(c) AND 80
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, on July 25, 1989, by Resolution
City Council approved the Tentative Subdivision
Vista Tract 88-3, EastLake Greens; and
No. 15200, the
Map for Chula
WHEREAS, Tentative Map Condition of Approval No. 30
required developer to enter into an agreement whereby the
developer promises that the City may wi thhold building permits
for any units in the subject subdivision if traffic on Otay Lakes
Road, Telegraph Canyon Road, EastLake Parkway, or East nHn Street
exceed the levels of service iden tif ied in the City I S adopted
Thresholds; and
WHEREAS, Tentative Map Condition of Approval No. 3l(b)
required the property owner to enter into an agreement whereby
property owner promises to not protest formation of a district
for the maintenance of landscaped medians and parkways along
streets within and adjacent to the subject property; and
WHEREAS, Tentative Map Condition of Approval No. 3l(c)
required the developer to agree to waive the right to protest the
formation of any assessment district of the construction of
street improvements to connect Orange Avenue and Palomar Street
to existing improvements to the west of the subject property and
to not protest inclusion of the subject improvements as projects
in the Eastern Territories Development Impact Fee system; and
WHEREAS, Tentative Map
required developer to submit
regarding public use of the Golf
of any final map; and
Condition of Approval NO. 80
an agreement to Chula vista
Course prior to the recordation
WHEREAS, the developer has executed an agreement to
satisfy this requirement.
the City
Agreement
EastLake
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
of Chula Vista does hereby approve the Supplemental
with EastLake Development company, the developer of
Greens Phase lD, Units 25 and 40 needed to satisfy
lie-I / UB-A:!~~
Tentative Map Conditions of Approval No. 30, 3l(b), 3l(c) and 80,
a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk.
rm by
J
Presented by
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
8934a
'ty Attorney
)I B-~5!
Recording Requested by:
CITY CLERK
When Recorded, Mail to:
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, Ca. 91910
No transfer tax is due as this
is a conveyance to a public
agency of less than a fee
interest for which no cash
consideration has been paid or
received.
Declarant
SUPPLEMENTAL SUBDIVISION IMPROVEMENT AGREEMENT
CHULA VISTA TRACT 88-3
EastLake Greens Phase 10, units 25 & 40
Regarding Condition Nos. 30, 31 (b), 31(c) and 80
This Agreement is made this 18th day of June, 1991, by and
between THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, California ("Chula Vista" or
"Grantee" for recording purposes only) and WESTERN SALT COMPANY, a
California Corporation, and EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a
California General Partnership (both of which entities are herein
referred to as "EastLake" or "Grantor" for recording purposes
only), and is made with reference to the following facts:
R E C I TAL S
A. This Agreement concerns and affects the Property legally
described as Lot 1 (part of unit 40, Tentative Map), Lot 2 (part of
Unit 40, Tentative Map) and Lot 3 (Unit 25, Tentative Map) of
Subdivision Map No. , filed in the County Recorder's Office
of the County of San Diego, on June ,1991, File No.
("property"), and is commonly known as the real property which is
the subject matter of the EastLake Greens Phase 10, units 25 and 40
Tentative Map. 1
1. Filing instructions to the Title Company should include
insertion of info to complete this section.
ssia-EL2.wp
June 11, 1991
SSIA re Phase 10, units 25 & 40
Page 1
1\ 8 - 46,,,
B. EastLake is the owner of the Property; and,
c. EastLake has applied for and obtained a tentative map
("Tentative Map") and has thereby obtained city approval to sub-
divide a parcel of land of which the Property is a part, subject to
certain requirements and conditions, as contained in Resolution No.
15200, approved on July 25, 1989; and,
D. EastLake has prepared and has submitted to the city the
Final Map for Chula vista Tract 88-3, Phase ID, units 25 and 40.
E. City has adopted City-wide "thresholds", as established by
city Resolution No. 13346, as same may be, from time to time,
amended by the City ("Quality of Life Thresholds" or "Thresholds").
These Thresholds establish performance and "quality of life"
standards for a variety of services and impacts which must be in
existence or met by the Project as a condition of permitting the
Project to be built. The Thresholds were incorporated as
conditions of Project approvals by city.
F. In addition to the Thresholds, and as a mechanism to
insure compliance therewith, the City has adopted the Eastern Chula
vista Transportation Phasing Plan ("Phasing Plan"). The Phasing
Plan provides that certain transportation facilities have to be in
existence or provided by the Project as conditions of permitting
the Project to be built.
G. The Thresholds and the Phasing Plan establish standards
and levels of service for various identified public facilities and
resources. These standards and levels of service are enforced
through the withholding of building permits when the public
facility or resource drops below a specified threshold.
H. One of the conditions of approval of the Tentative Map for
Chula Vista Tract 88-3 requires EastLake to enter into an agreement
whereby the EastLake promises that the city may withhold building
permits for any units in the subject subdivision if traffic on Otay
Lakes Road, Telegraph Canyon Road, EastLake Parkway, or East "H"
street exceed the levels of service identified in the City I S
adopted Thresholds. (Condition 30)
I. One of the conditions of approval of the Tentative Map for
Chula vista Tract 88-3 requires EastLake to enter into an agreement
whereby EastLake promises to not protest formation of a district
for the maintenance of landscaped medians and parkways along
streets within and adjacent to the subject property. (Condition
No. 31(b))
J. One of the conditions of approval of the Tentative Map for
ssia-EL2.wp
June 11, 1991
SSIA re Phase ID, units 25 & 40
Page 2
H6-5??
Chula vista Tract 88-3 requires EastLake to enter into an agreement
whereby EastLake promises to not protest formation of an assessment
district for the construction of street improvements to connect
Orange Avenue and Palomar street to existing improvements to the
west of the subject property and to not protest inclusion of the
subject improvements as projects in the Eastern Territories
Development Impact Fee system. (Condition No. 31(c))
K. One of the conditions of approval of the Tentative Map for
Chula vista Tract 88-3 requires EastLake to submit an agreement to
Chula vista regarding public use of the Golf Course prior the
recordation of any final map (Condition 80); and,
NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
I. Aareement Aoolicable to Subseauent Owners.
A. Aareement Bindinq Uoon Successors. This Agreement shall
be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the successors, assigns
and interests of the Parties as to any or all of the Property until
released by the mutual consent of the parties.
B. Aqreement Runs with the Land. The burden of the covenants
contained in this Agreement ("Burden") is for the benefit of the
land owned by the city adj acent to the Property. The Burden
touches and concerns the Property. It is the intent of the
parties, and the parties agree, that this covenant shall be binding
upon, and run with, the ownership of the land which it burdens.
II. Buildinq Permits Not to Issue While Thresholds Deficient
(Condition 301.
A. EastLake hereby grants to the City the right to withhold
building permits for any improvements on the subject Property at
such time as anyone of the following occur:
1. The public facilities monitoring program as provided
for in the Eastlake II Public Facilities Financing Plan
("PFFP") for the Project indicates that required
facilities as identified in the PFFP or any revisions
thereto have not been provided, as determined by the City
Engineer and Director of Planning.
2. Traffic volumes, levels of service, utilities and/or
services exceed the adopted City threshold standards,
including, but not limited to, those for East "H" Street,
Otay Lakes Road, Telegraph Canyon Road, or EastLake
Parkway.
ssia-EL2.wp
June 11, 1991
SSIA re Phase 10, Units 25 & 40
Page 3
l\ B - ..P 6'i"
3. Regional development threshold limits set by the
Phasing Plan have been reached.
The foregoing three conditions shall herein be referred to as
"Conditions for withholding of Building Permits."
B. EastLake hereby agrees to not "pull", and City will not
issue, building permits, aHa te Het oonstruet any further
FeaiEiclltial st.raetl;1l'ca 611 the fZJli19j ~et rreperty er any pertieR
thereaf if anyone of the Conditions for Withholding of Building
Permits occur, e)[eep~ fer atr\7letl:lrca fer ....."fiiel=1 Bl;1ilEiill~ pcrmi to
Ra~e heaR iSBHca whiek are uRBcr eeRstI'l;1etien at the time tHat a
Gsftsitien fer WithhelEiiR~ af BailEiiR! Permits ariscs.2
2. The stricken language was originally proposed by the City
Attorney.
The
Approval
approval
paragraph, as stricken,
of the agreement as marked
of the EastLake version.
is acceptable to EastLake.
for deletions will constitute
The City Attorney is willing, for this Final Map only, to
approve the EastLake version. Public Works concurs. Planning is
still evaluating.
This is a relatively small final map territory, which is
planned for 40 units (and which is the subject matter of a density
change request to 70 units). The city Attorney I s recommendation in
this limited instance only is based on the fact that (1) the City
Attorney's proposed agreement is a relatively new concept and
something of a surprise to EastLake (Baldwin concurred in the City
Attorney's language on a recent Salt Creek/FNP Final Map), and (2)
EastLake contends that they have a pending sale of the golf course.
A proposed alternative ("Estimation Entitlement Language") for
future agreements could be worded as follows, which similarly
protects the City to a level satisfactory to the city Attorney.
"EastLake hereby agrees to not "pull", and City will not
issue, building permits if anyone of the Conditions for
Withholding of Building Permits occur, or are estimated by the
City, in its judgement, reasonably exercised, using industry-
approved planning projection standards, to occur as a result
of development and occupancy of the Property or of other
property for which final maps have been approved."
EastLake has agreed to support further workshops and
discussions on this issue.
ssia-EL2.wp
June 11, 1991
SSIA re Phase lD, units 25 & 40
Page 4
He -.~
C. EastLake further waives any objection to the authority of
the City to exercise its right herein granted to withhold building
permits, and acknowledges the authority of the City to exercise the
right herein granted. EastLake furthermore acknowledges that the
exclusive remedy to seek redress for the imposition of any
conditions which they deem to be improper or in excess of the
authority of the City to impose is by administrative mandamus.
D. city agrees that the execution of this Agreement fulfills
EastLake's obligations relating to Conditions of Approval No. 30 of
the Tentative Map as it applies to Property. Even though
Transportation Facilites Nos. 6 (South Greensview Drive) and 10
(Hunte Parkway between Clubhouse Drive and South Greensview Drive),
as idenitified in Condition No. 3 of Tentative Map Resolution No.
15200 have not been completed as required to prosecute any part of
Phase 1D to final map, since this subdivision is not immediately
going to result in residential lots without further division, the
parties agree that EastLake's obligation to complete this condition
is hereby deferred until the further division of the Property or
any remaining portion of the Tentative Map.
III. Cost of Landscape Maintenance (Condition 31b).
A. EastLake hereby agrees to not protest the formation of a
landscape maintenance district for the maintenance of medians and
parkways along streets within and adjacent to the subject Property
and to not oppose the inclusion of the Property within said
landscape maintenance district. This agreement to not protest the
inclusion of these public improvements shall not be deemed a waiver
of the right to challenge the amount of any additional assessment
which may be imposed due to the addition of these new improvements
and shall not interfere with the right of any person to vote in a
secret ballot election.
B. EastLake hereby agrees to pay to the City all costs
incurred by the city, inCluding staff time plus overhead and
consultant costs, in the formation of the landscape maintenance
district. EastLake further agrees to deposit in advance such sums
as the City shall require to prosecute the formation of said
district, and agrees to execute all documents necessary to achieve
the formation of said district as the city shall require.
C. city agrees that the execution of this Agreement fulfills
EastLake's obligation to Condition 31b of Chula vista Tract 88-3 as
it applies to property.
ssia-EL2.wp
June 11, 1991
SSIA re Phase 1D, Units 25 & 40
page 5
1\ a-~ '0
IV. Formation of Assessment District (Condition 31cl.
A. EastLake hereby promises to not protest formation of an
assessment district which includes the Property for the
construction of street improvements to connect Orange Avenue and
Palomar street to existing improvements to the west of the subject
property and to not protest inclusion of the subject improvements
as projects in the Eastern Territories Development Impact Fee
system.
B. City agrees that the execution of this Agreement fulfills
EastLake's obligation regarding Condition 31c of the Tentative Map
as it applies to Property.
V. Includina Unit 40 in Golf Course Aareement Leaal (Condition
~.
A. The Parties agree that the agreement between themselves,
entitled "supplemental Subdivision Improvement Agreement Regarding
Condition No. 80.", dated January 22, 1991 for the purposes of
reference, is hereby amended in the following respects only, and as
amended, continues to remain in full force and effect: Exhibit A,
entitled "Legal Description of golf Course Lots", shall now read as
follows:
"Lots 6, 9, 12 and 17 in the City of Chula Vista, County of
San Diego, state of California according to map thereof No.
12545 filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego
County January 26, 1990; and,
Lot 1 & 2 in the city of Chula Vista, County of San Diego~
state of California according to map thereof No.
filed in the office of the County Recorder of San Diego county
4
B. City agrees that the execution of this Agreement fulfills
EastLake's obligation regarding Condition 80 of the Tentative Map,
as it applies to this Property.
VI. Gradina Indemnities.
A. EastLake hereby agrees to indemnify, defend, and hold the
City harmless from any liability due to erosion, siltation or
increased flow of drainage resulting from the construction of the
3. Title Company to insert info on recording.
4. Title Company to add date of recording.
ssia-EL2.wp
June 11, 1991
SSIA re Phase 10, Units 25 & 40
Page 6
l\8-~~1
improvements associated with the final maps for the subject
Property.
VII. Miscellaneous.
3. Notices. Unless otherwise provided in this Agreement or
by law, any and all notices required or permitted by this Agreement
or by law to be served on or delivered to either party shall be in
writing and shall be deemed duly served, delivered, and received
when personally delivered to the party to whom it is directed, or
in lieu thereof, when three (3) business days have elapsed
following deposit in the u.s. mail, certified or registered mail,
return receipt requested, first-class postage prepaid, addressed to
the address indicated in this Agreement. A party may change such
address for the purpose of this paragraph by giving written notice
of such change to the other party. Facsimile transmission shall
constitute personal delivery.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
276 4th Ave.
Chula Vista, CA 92010
Attn: Engineering Department
EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
900 Lane Avenue, suite 100
Chula Vista, Ca. 92013
A party may change such address for the purpose of this
paragraph by giving written notice of such change to the other
party ~n the manner provided in this paragraph. Facsimile
transmission shall constitute personal delivery.
4. captions. captions in this Agreement are inserted for
convenience of reference and do not define, describe or limit the
scope or intent of this Agreement or any of its terms.
5. Entire Aqreement. This Agreement contains the entire
agreement between the parties regarding the subject matter hereof.
Any prior oral or written representations, agreements,
understandings, and/or statements shall be of no force and effect.
This Agreement is not intended to supercede or amend any other
agreement between the parties unless expressly noted. This
includes, but is not limited to the "Development Agreement by and
between EastLake Development Company, Developer, and City of CHula
Vista, City".
6. Preparation of Aqreement. No inference,
presumption shall be drawn from the fact that a
attorney prepared and/or drafted this Agreement.
assumption or
party or his
It shall be
ssia-EL2.wp
June 11, 1991
SSIA re Phase 1D, units 25 & 40
Page 7
1 \S3 ~I ~-t
conclusively presumed that both parties participated equally in the
preparation and/or drafting this Agreement.
7. Recitals: Exhibits. Any recitals set forth above are
incorporated by reference into this Agreement.
8. Attornevs' Fees. In the event of any dispute arising out
of this Agreement, the prevailing party in any action shall be
entitled to reasonable attorneys' fees in addition to any other
costs, damages, or remedies.
SSia-EL2.wp
June 11, 1991
SSIA re Phase 1D, units 25 & 40
Page 8
l\B-~(d
Signature Page to
Supplemental Subdivision Improvement Agreement
EastLake Greens Phase 1D, units 25 & 40
Regarding Condition Nos. 30, 31(b) and 31 (c)
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this
Agreement to be effective as of the day and year first hereinabove
set forth.
Dated:
, 1991
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
By:
Leonard M. Moore,
its Mayor Pro Tem
Attest:
Beverly Authelet, city Clerk
Approved as to Form:
Bruce M. Boogaard, city Attorney
Dated:
, 1991
EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, a
California general partnership
comprised of corporations,
By: Daniel V. Inc., a California
corporation, General Partner
By:
Robert Santos,
President
its
Vice
By: Daniel V, Inc., a California
corporation, General Partner
By:
Robert Santos,
President
its
Vice
Dated:
, 1991 WESTERN SALT COMPANY, a California
Corporation
By:
Henry F. Hunt, President
ssia-EL2.wp
June 11, 1991
SSIA re Phase ID, units 25 & 40
Page 9
"B-1JZ~lf
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
SUBMITTED BY:
Item~
Meeting Date 6/18/91
Resolution \lc\cr3 Approving first amendment to the
agreement with Wi 11 dan Associ ates for assessment engi neeri ng
services rendered for the Otay Valley Road Assessment District
90-2, and authorizing the Mayor to sign said amendment
Director of Publ ic work~ ryrJ
City Manager f (4j5ths Vote: Yes_No--X.J
,;
On May 22, 1990, by Resolution 15627, Council approved an agreement with
Wi 11 dan Associ ates for consult i ng servi ces as assessment engi neer for Otay
Va 11 ey Road Assessment Di stri ct 90-2 and Otay Ri 0 Busi ness Park Assessment
District 89-3. This item is to consider approval of the first amendment to
the contract for a proposed expanded scope of work and includes an increase in
the contract amount. Adequate funds have already been appropri ated by the
Redevelopment Agency for this CIP project which will also cover the proposed
increase in compensation for the additional work (996-9960-STI23)
ITEM TITLE:
REVIEWED BY:
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that Council approve the reso 1 ut i on and
authorize the Mayor to execute said amendment.
DISCUSSION:
Council approved an agreement with Willdan Associates on May 22, 1990 to
provide consulting services which included the following scope of work:
1. Analyze various methods of financing the improvement of Otay Valley Road
Phase I (I-80S to Nirvana Avenue), the improvement of Otay Valley Road -
Phase II (Nirvana Avenue to the City boundary), and the publ ic
improvements associated with the Otay Rio Business Park development.
This is a limited scope of work used to complete the Feasibility
Financing Plan.
2. Determine what offsite street improvements, if any, the developer of the
Otay Rio Business Park is required to construct to satisfy conditions
associated with approval of their tentative map.
3. Perform assessment engi neeri ng servi ces associ ated wi th Otay Vall ey Road
Phase I and Otay Ri 0 Busi ness Park Phases I and I I. Otay Valley Road -
Phase II was not included under this section.
Wi 11 dan Associ ates are the assessment engi neers for both Otay Valley Road
Assessment Di stri ct and Otay Ri 0 Bus i ness Park. Task 2 of thi s contract
indicated that Otay Rio would need a minimum four lanes to handle the traffic
for the buil d-out of Otay Ri o. In that regard, staff needs to i ncl ude the
assessment work to build Phase II shortly following Phase I but reduce the
scope of improvements in Phase II to allow Baldwin (Otay Ranch) to participate
later by installing their share of improvements when they develop. This
alternative will provide a facil ity that will adequately serve Otay Valley
I~-I
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date 6/18/91
Redevelopment Area and Otay Rio Business Park and will equitably spread the
costs to the present and future users, and wi 11 defer Bal dwi n' s contri but i on
until they need the facility. However, as work has progressed on this
project, staff recogni zed the need to i ncl ude assessment engi neeri ng
associated with Otay Valley Road Phase II improvements (Nirvana to east City
boundary) in the scope of work.
Staff recommends the addition of Otay Valley Road - Phase II items to the
exi st i ng contract under the section associ ated wi th Assessment Engi neeri ng.
Tasks to be added to their contract will include the following:
1. Identify and analyze Otay Valley Road - Phase II improvements to include
analysis of Otay Ranch's future financial responsibilities and Otay Rio
Business Park's obligations for Phase II and consider other applicable
constraints.
2. Receive, review and analyze Otay Valley Road - Phase II cost estimates.
3. Modify assessment methodology to include Otay Valley Road - Phase II
improvements.
4. Modify the draft Engineer's Report to include Otay Valley Road - Phase II
improvements.
5. Attend meetings to discuss Otay Valley Road Phase II improvements, cost
estimates, and spread methodology.
By adding the analysi s of Phase II improvements to the contract, staff can
better determine what ultimate financial participation is required of Otay Rio
Business Park and Otay Valley Road Redevelopment Area. Otay Rio Business
Park, as a condition of their tentative map, is required to improve Otay
Valley Road - Phase II prior to build-out of their industrial park and
therefore staff feels it is important to determine the extent of that
financial responsibility now. Staff also needs to know this prior to
proceeding with the assessment district for Otay Rio Business Park to ensure
that the 3:1 value-to-lien ratio is met. Staff cannot determine what
additional debt can be placed by the proposed Otay Rio Business Park
assessment di stri ct wi thout fi rst determi ni ng the debt to be pl aced by the
improvement of Otay Valley Road Phases I and I I. Staff also feels that the
Redevelopment Area property owners would want to know the extent of their
financial participation of both Phases I and II at the time a district is
formed.
Staff recommends that Phase 1 and 2 be included in one assessment district,
not two separate districts as originally envisioned. By doing this,
proceedings required to form the district need to be done only once which
staff feels will simplify the process. It is anticipated that Phase II
construction would lag behind Phase I construction by about eight months.
1;2. - A
Page 3, Item
Meeting Date 6/18/91
Under Assessment Enoi neeri no Wi 11 dan Associ ates' ori gi na 1 contract for Otay
Valley Road - Phase I was for $34,000. Their entire contract is for $175,000,
which includes compensation for work performed on one other assessment
district, Otay Rio 8usiness Park. To perform the additional work to include
Phase II, Wi11dan Associates requests payment of an additional $14,500 for a
total of $48,500 to include Phase II in that section of the contract
associated with Assessment Enoineerino for Otay Valley Road. Staff, including
Community Development, recommends approval of the amendment modifying the
scope of work and a corresponding adjustment in compensation.
FISCAL IMPACT: An additional $14,500 will be expended from Account No.
996-9960-ST123 which is the CIP for the Otay Valley Road Widening Project.
The contingency included in the CIP will cover the additional expenditure.
DDS:kj/AY081
WPC 5606E
'~-3//~ "'Z3
~
.
ITEM TITLE:
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
. .
A ("v
/,-<".I'.,~ I ,
. /~~/ &,1
I1Y-Otllil
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
-
Item ~.::t... b/ c.
Meeting Date 5/22/90
Resolution /5627 Approving agreements with Thomas O.
Meade, Wi11dan Associates, Brown and Harpe, and Kadie-Jensen
. and Johnson for Special Assessment Services associated with
Otay Valley Road (I-80S to Eastern City limits) and Otay Rio
Business.park public. improvements
Resolution /5t::>26 Approving .a Reimbursement Agreement
between the City of Chu1 a Vi s ta and the Chill i ngworth
Corporation for all initial consulting and administrative
costs and expenses for Otay Rio Business Park public
improvements
Resol uti on /5 b2. 9 Appropri ati ng
Road Phase I I (Ni rvana Avenue to
Feasibility/Financing Stu~~~~
Director of Public Works~ y,v (,"'j.
Di rector of Communi ty Development -
funds for
Eastern
Otay
City
Valley
limits)
City Manager
(4/5ths Vote: Yes2-No_)
The Redevelopment Agency and the developer of Otay Rio Business Park are
attempting to finance the public improvement of Otay Valley Road from I-80S to
the eastern City limits and public improvements within the business park
through the assessment process. Therefore, the City needs to hire an
assessment team, enter into an reimbursement agreement with Chillingworth
Corporation and appropriate the funds to hire the assessment team.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the resolutions and authorize the
Mayor to execute said agreements and authorize the appropriation of $11 ,250
from the General Fund.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
On May 15, 1990, the Redevelopment Agency recommended the hiring of the
Special Assessment team of Thomas O. Meade, Willdan Associates, Brown and
Harpe, and Kadie-Jensen and Johnson, and transferred the funds to the City to
pay for the services required to set up a district to finance the publ ic
improvements from I-80S to Nirvana Avenue. The developer of Otay Rio Business
Park (Chillingworth Corporation) has also requested the City look into the
feasibility of establishing a special district to finance the public
improvements associated with this subdivision. Staff recommends that the same
team be hired to perform the feasibil ity stUdy and assessment proceedings for
both projects.
'~-1
.
..
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date 5/22/90
Chillingworth is proposing to advance all funds associated with their
project. Once the special assessment district is fonned and the bonds sold,
the City will need to reimburse Chill ingworth for the monies advanced. (The
Redevelopment Agency may also be reimbursed from the sale of bonds.) The
City. therefor. needs to enter into a reimbursement agreement with the
Chillingworth Corporation. Said agreement is now before Council for approval.
The total cash necessary to pay for these services has been either
appropri ated by the Re'deve 1 opment Agency or advanced by the Ch ill i ng~lOrth
Corporation with the exception of $11,250 which is the City's portion of the
cost needed to perform the feasibil ity study for' Phase II (Nirvana Avenue to
the Eastern City Limits). The funds are proposed to be appropriated from the
General Fund and may be reimbursed shoul d the project be incl uded in the
transportation DIF program.
FISCAL IMPACT: All costs associated with Otay Rio Business Park will be
paid by the Chill ingworth Corporation. The Redevelopment Agency has already
appropriated the funds needed for Otay Lakes Road Phase I (996-9960-ST123).
However, additional funds in the amount of $11 ,250 need to be" appropriated
from the unappropriated balance of the General Fund as a loan to the Otay
Vall ey Project.
WPC 4998E
.
lA-S
J
:J
RESOLUTION NO. 15627
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
APPROV I NG AGREEMENTS 101 lTH THOMAS O. MEAOE, WI LLDAN
ASSOCIATES, BROWN AND HARPE, AND KADIE-JENSEN AND JOHNSON
FOR SPECIAL ASSESSMENT SERVICES ASSOCIATED WITH OTAY
VALLEY ROAD (1-805 TO EASTERN CITY LIMITS) AND OTAY RIO
BUSINESS PARK PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
The City Council of the City of Chula. Vista does hereby resolve as
follows:
WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency and the developer of Otay Rio Business
Park are attempting to finance the public improvement of Otay Valley Road from
1-805 to the eastern City 1 imits and publ ic improvements within the business
park through the assessment process, and
WHEREAS, therefore, the City needs to hire an assessment team, enter into
an reimbursement agreement with Chillingworth Corporation and appropriate the
funds to hire the assessment team.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista does hereby approve agreements with Thomas O. Meade, Willdan Associates,
Brown and Harpe, and Kadie-Jensen and Johnson for Special Assessment Services
associated with Otay Valley Road (1-805 to Eastern City limits) and Otay Rio
Business Park pub I ic improvements, copies of which are on file in the office
of the City Clerk.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of Chula Vista be, and
he is hereby authorized and di rected to execute said agreements for and on
behalf of the City of Chula Vista.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
~ t;t -~
00;: . lpplt ~
Di ector of Public Works
IJ)tt,ci i~ )-;~
U. Rlchard RUdOlf)
Ass i stant Ci ty Attorney /
.
l~-~
"..,,"~
11".'. .j,.
.
.
,
AGREEMENT FOR SERVICES
THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this~ day of , 1990, by and
between the CITY OF CHULA VISTA, a municipal corporati (hereinafter referred
to as "City"), and WILLDAN ASSOCIATES (hereinafter referred to as "Engineer").
WITNESSETH:
WHEREAS: City is desirous of considering various methods of financing, and
the feasibility thereof. for the improvement of Otay Valley Road - Phase I (I-80S to
Nirvana Ave.), Otay Valley Road - Phase II O"hrvana Avenue to future intersection of
Paseo Ranchero), and the public improvements associated with the Otay Rio Business
Park development, including but not limited to the Municipal Improvement Act of
1913, the Melio-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, Development Impact Fees,
or developer exactions, and
WHEREAS, City is desirous of implementing the financing of the improvement
of Otay Valley Road - Phase I, Otay Valley Road - Phase II and the public improve-
ments associated with the Otay Rio Business Park, and
WHEREAS, City is desirous of determinjng what off-site street improvements,
if any, the developer of the Otay Rio Business Park may be required to construct in
order to satisfy conditions contained in City Resolution No. 15310, and
WHEREAS, City is desirous of retaining Engineer for the preparation of an
overall feasibility and financlJ1g plan. as well as to perform the assessment engineering
functions in the Otay Rio BuslJ1ess Park Phase I (AD 89-3A) and Phase II (AD89-3B)
with financing proceedings to be conducted pursuant to one or more of the provisions
provided for such financing by the Streets and Highways Code of the State of
Califorrua, and
WHEREAS, Engineer is experienced and familiar with all aspects of infrastruc-
ture feasibility analysis and assessment engineering, and is trained and staffed for
municipal consulting, and is wIlling and capable of performing functions.related to said
Assessment Districts that are not ~rformed by City.
NOW, THEREFORE. IT IS HEREBY MUTUALLY AGREED by and
between the parties hereto as follows:
1
(/01'0-10
36231.CON :js
(( ItJ~/'7
}'--7
.,
. .
SCOPE OF SERVICES
SECTION 1
Under tbe direction of the City Manager or his designated representative, Engineer
shall perform the following services:
A. FINANCING AND FEASIBILITY PLANS
1. Otay Valley Road - Phase I (1-805 to Nirvana Avenue)
a. Collect available land use information, tentative maps, conditions
of approval, public improvement plans and estimates, and existing
improvement data.
b. Collect relevant Redevelopment District data.
c. In conjunction with the design engineer, analyze cost estimates for
each proposed facility, as well as estimates for financing costs.
d. In conjunction with the financial consultant and City staff, analyze
potential participation methods by the City and Redevelopment
Agency in the cost of the proposed improvements.
e. Explore the viability of including some or all of the improvements
in the Eastern Territories Transportation Development Impact
Fee.
f. Prepare a map for each proposed facility or type of facility which
shows its utilization or benefit areas.
g. Develop a preliminary spread methodology or allocation of
remaining costs to each property on the basis of benefit received
by that property for the proposed improvements.
h. Provide a preliJ;l1inary assessment for each parcel or similar group
of parcels.
i. Provide above information to financial consultant for the purpose
of preparing a preliminary value 10 lien analysis.
2
36231.CON :js
I:J - i'
I
\
"
,""
j. Prepare a feasibility and financing plan which incorporates the
above information in a recommended procedure to finance the
proposed improvements in a fair and equitable manner.
k. Meet with property owners and City staff throughout the prepara-
tion of the plan.
2. Otay Valley Road. Phase II (Nirvana Avenue to future Paseo Ranchero)
a. Collect available land use information, tentative maps, conditions
of approval, public improvement plans and cost estimates, and
existing improvements data.
b. Estimate vehicle trip capacity of existing improvements. Evaluate
trip capacity estImates of eXisting two lane section and recommend
engineering changes to II1crease the capacity, if required.
c. In concert with the Otay Rio Business Park developer and City
staff, determine what improvements, if any, would be required to
meet acceptance standards such as those contained in the Highway
Capacity Manual and ASHTO Guide.
d. Explore the viability of including some or all of the ultimate
improvements in the Eastern Territories Transportation Develop-
ment Impact Fee.
e. Prepare a feasibility and financing plan which incorporates the
above information in a recommended procedure to finance the
proposed improvements in a fair and equitable manner.
f. Meet with property owners. county personnel, and City staff
throughout the preparation of the plan.
3. Otay Rio Business Park (Phases I and II)
.
a. Collect available land use information, tentative maps, conditions
of approval, various public facilities studies, preliminary or final
engineering plans, and cost estimates for the subject property, as
well as similar available information for surrounding properties
that may be affected or included.
3
36231.CON:js
I~-q
b. Provide a description of each improvement to be included in the
financing plan. Descriptions are to be based on final or prelimi-
nary engineering plans provided by the developer and shall be of
sufficient detail to allow preliminary cost estimates to be per-
formed.
c. In conjunction with developer's design engineer, analyze cost
estimates for each proposed facility, as well as estimates for
iinancing costs.
d. Prepare a map for each proposed facility or type of facility which
shows its utilization or benefit areas.
e. Develop a preliminary spread methodology or allocation of costs
to each property on the basis of benefit received by that property
for the proposed improvements, including those improvements in
Al and A2 above which have been determined to benefit or be
the responsibility of the Otay Rio Business Park.
f. Provide a preliminary assessment for each parcel or similar group
of anticipated future parcels.
g. Provide above information to financial consultant for the purpose
of preparing a preliminary value to lien analysis.
h. Prepare a feasibility and financing plan which incorporates the
above information in a manner which will enable the property
owner, as well as the City to assess the feasibility of utilizing public
financing.
1. Meet with the property owners, their engineers, other consultants,
and the City, staff throughout the preparation of the preliminary
report and present the completed report to the developers and
City staff for review.
B. ASSESSMENT ENGINEERING
1. Otay Valley Road - Phase I (construction by City of Chula Vista)
4
36231.CON:js
1~-lb
..
.'
a. In consultation with City staff, property owners, and other
consultants, using the feasibility report as a guide, prepare a
boundary map for the proposed assessment district;
b. In consultation with City staff owners, and other consultants, using
the feasibility report as a guide, determine the improvements to be
financed by the assessment process;
c. ,Provide legal descriptions for each parcel within the boundaries of
the proposed Assessment District consistent with the Assessment
District Acts to be used;
d. Obtain the proper addresses of owners and prepare mailing list for
required mailings. The mailing list shall be alphabetical and cross-
indexed to assessor's parcel numbers which shall list parcels
sequentially;
e. Verify the quantities and cost estimate provided by the design
engineer for the facilities to be constructed with the funds received
through the assessment process;
f. Finalize the assessment methodology to be used in accordance
wIth the applicable provisions of state law;
g. Apportion the costs of the facilities in the form of special assess-
ments to be levied upon the parcels of land within the District
using the assessment methodology determined above;
h. Meet and consult with the property owners, as necessary, during
the assessment spread process to ensure that those persons have
a clear understanding of the method of assessment spread prior to
public hearings;
i. Prepare a preliminary engineer's report to include assessments
upon and against the parcels in the District for the total amount
of estimated costs and expenses of such work in proportion to the
estimated benefits to be received for each of the parcels within the
District;
J. Prepare the assessment diagrams, assessment roll warrants, and
notices for mailing;
k. Prepare the notices of public hearing;
5
36231.CON :js
I~ -It
1. Contract for printing of the improvement notices and posting of
the improvement notices throughout the District as required by
law;
m. Answer property owners questions before, during and after the
public hearing;
n. Attend all public hearings required by law for establishment of the
assessment district;
o. Upon completion of the pubItc hearings on the assessment spread
make such revisions to the spread as are ordered by the City
Council;
p. Based on construction bids received, the City Council direction,
prepare and publish a final engineer's report of the assessments
and assist in filing and recording of the engineer's report as
required by the Assessment District Proceedings Law;
q. Upon confirmation of assessments, prepare and mail notice of
assessments as required to all assessed property owners.
2. Otay Rio Business Park Phases I and II
It is anticipated that Phases 1 and 2 will be processed separately and at
separate times as Assessment District 89-3A (Phase 1) and Assessment
District 89-3B (Phase 2). If and when an assessment district proceeding
is necessary for this project, the scope of work for Phase II would be the
same as Phase I.
a. In consultation with City staff, property owners, and other
consultants,. using the feasibility report as a guide, prepare a
boundary map for the proposed assessment district;
b. In consultation with City staff, property owners, and other
consultants, using the feasibility report as a guide, determine the
improvements to be financed by the assessment process;
c. Provide legal descriptions for each parcel within the boundaries of
the proposed Assessment District consistent with the Assessment
District Acts to be used;
6
,~ -I~
36231.CON:js
. .
d. Obtain the proper addresses of owners and prepare mailing list for
required mailings. The mailing list shall be alphabetical and cross-
indexed to assessor's parcel numbers which shall list parcels
sequentially;
e. Verify the quantities and cost estimate provided by the developer
for the facilities to be constructed with the funds received through
the assessment process;
f. Determine the assessment methodology to be used in accordance
with the applicable provisions of State law;
g. Apportion the costs of the facilities in the form of special assess-
ments to be levied upon the parcels of land within the District
using the assessment methodology determined above;
h. Meet and consult with the property owners, as necessary, during
the assessment spread process to ensure that those persons have
a clear understanding of the method of assessment spread prior to
pu blic hearings;
i. Prepare a preliminary engineer's report to include assessments
upon and against the parcels in the District for the total amount
of estimated costs and expenses of such work in proportion to the
estimated benefits to be received for each of the parcels within the
District;
J. Prepare the assessment diagrams, assessment roll warrants, and
notices for mailing;
k. Prepare the notices of public hearing;
I. Contract for printing of the improvement notices and posting of
the Improvement notices throughout the District as required by
law;
.
m. Answer property owners questions before, during and after the
public assessment district;
n. Attend all public hearings required by law for establishment of the
assessment district;
7
36231.CON :js
1~ - /3
o. Upon completion of the public hearings on the assessment spread
make such revisions to the spread as are ordered by the City
Council;
p. Based on construction bids received, the City Council direction,
prepare and publish a final engineer's report of the assessments
and assist in filing and recording of the engineer's report as
required by the Assessment District Proceedings Law;
q. 'Upon confirmation of assessments, prepare and mail notice of
assessments as required to an assessed property owners.
3. Otay Rio Business Park Acquisition Services
It is probable that the procedure used to construct the proposed
improvements would also result in an acquisition type district. If so, the
improvements would be constructed using private funding and acquired
by the City using the 1913 Act proceedings and 1915 Act bonds.
Following is a Scope of Work for the engineering items necessary in such
proceedings.
a. Prepare a list of quantities and unit prices based on bids received
by the private party for the works of improvement. .
b. Review all agreements between the City and the property owners
including the acquisition agreement.
c. Verify the final improvement quantities and associated costs,
including incidental expenses, which will be the subject of acquisi-
tion and provide a certification to the City.
SCHEDULE OF WORK
SECTION 2
The amount of time to complete the actions and tasks is estimated to be about two
years. The general services provided under this Agreement shall be continuing until
completion of the project or termination of this Agreement. The following is a
schedule of work to be completed.
8
36231.CON:js
l;;l-/~
1. Section 1-A-I, Otay Valley Road - Phase I, Financing/Feasibility Plan.
Commence April, 1990 - complete June, 1990.
2. Section 1-A-2, Otay Valley Road - Phase II, Financing/Feasibility Plan.
Commence April, 1990 - complete June, 1990.
3. Section 1-A-3, Otay Rio Business Park, Financing/Feasibility Plan.
Commence April, 1990 - complete June, 1990.
4. Section 1-B-1, Otay Valley Road - Phase I assessment district proceed-
ings. Commence July 1990, - complete February, 1991.
5. Section 1-B-2, Otay Rio Business Park - Phase I assessment district
proceedings. Commence July, 1990 - complete February, 1991.
6. Section 1-B-2, Otay Rio Business Park - Phase II assessment district
proceedings. Commence December. 1990 - complete March, 1992.
FEE FOR SERVICES
SECI10N 3
Engineer shall perform the assessment engineering and related services as set forth in
Section 1 as follows:
A. For services performed under Section 1-A-1, the lump sum fee of $24,000,
payable in monthly progress payments based on percentage of the work
completed.
B. For services performed under Section 1-A-2, the lump sum fee of $18,000,
payable in monthly progress payments based on percentage of the work
completed.
C. For services performed under Section 1-A-3, covering both Phases 1 and 2, the
lump sum fee of $18.000, payable in monthly progress payments based on
percentage of the work completed.
D. For services performed under Section 1-B-1 for Phase 1 only, the lump sum fee
of $34,000, payable in monthly progress payments based on percentage of the
work completed.
9
36231.CON:js
1;2 -/~
.
, fff'.'"
.
E. For services performed under Section ]-B-2 for Phase 1 only, the lump sum fee
of $34,000, payable in monthly progress payments based on percentage of the
work completed. This fee shall be increased 5 percent on each July 1st unless
the subject work has commenced, In which case the fee shall be the fee
established on the previous July ]st or, if sooner, the original fee. The fee,
through 1993, shall not exceed $40,800.
F. For services performed under Section ]-B-2 for Phase 2 only, the lump sum fee
of $34,000, payable in month Iv progress payments based on percentage of the
work completed. This fee shall be increased 5 percent on each July 1st unless
the subject work has commenced, in which case the fee shall be the fee
established on the previous July ]st or, if sooner, the original fee. The fee,
through 1993, shall not exceed $40,800.
G. For services performed under Section ]-8-3 for Phase 1 and 2, the lump sum fee
of $5,000 per phase payable at the completion of the project from the bond sale
proceeds. This fee shall be increased 5 percent on each July 1st unless the
subject work has commenced, in which case the fee shall be the fee established
on the previous July ]st or, if sooner, the original fee. The fee through 1993
shall not exceed $6,000.
The cost of printing, reproduction, posting, publication, noticing, advertising, mailing
and postage, where provided by Engineer, shall be reimbursed to Engineer at his direct
cost, said amounts not to exceed $3,000, based on current hourly rates (see Exhibit A
for hourly rates). This fee shall be increased 5 percent on each July 1st unless the
subject work has commenced, in which case the fee shall be the fee established on the
previous July 1st or, if sooner, the original fee. The fee through 1993 shall not exceed
$3,600.
The total fees for services performed pursuant to this agreement, including reimburs-
able expenses, shall not e.xceed $175.000. Payment for fees beyond the current fiscal
year are contingent upon appropnatJon by the City Council for that fiscal year.
SERVICES BY CITY
SECTION 4
City agrees to furnish to Engineer, in a timely manner, such maps, records and other
documents and proceedings, or certified copies thereof, as are available and may be
reasonably required by Engineer in the performance of these services.
10
36231.CON:js
I~ - I'"
.
.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
SECTION 5
Engineer presently has and shall acquire no interest whatsoever in the subject matter
of this Agreement, direct or indirect, which would constitute a conflict of interest or
give the appearance of such conflict No person having any such conflict of interest
shall be employed or retained by Engineer under this Agreement.
TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT FOR CAUSE
SECTION 6
If, through any cause, Engineer shall fail to fulfill in a timely and proper manner his
obligations under this Agreement, or if Engineer shall violate any of the covenants,
agreements, or stipulations of the Agreement, City shall have the right to terminate this
Agreement by giving Written notice to Engineer of such termination and specifying the
effective date thereof, at least five (5) days before the effective date of such
termination, In that event, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys,
drawings, maps, reports, and other materials prepared by Engineer shall, at the option
of City, become the property of City and Engineer shall be entitled to receive just and
equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed on such documents and
other materials up to the effective date of notice of termination, not to exceed the
amounts payable under Section 3, hereinabove.
The use by City of any unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps,
reports or other materials shall be at City's sole risk and City shall hold harmless and
indemnify Engineer from any suit, loss, cost of defense, or liability resulting therefrom,
TERMINATION FOR CONVENIENCE OF CITY
SECTION 7
City may terminate the Agreement at any time and for any reason by giving written
notice to Engineer of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof, at
least thirty (30) days before the effel.tlve date of such termination. In that event, all
finished and unfinished documents and other materials described in Section 6,
hereinabove, shall, at the option of the City, become City's sole and exclusive property.
11
36231.CON:js
'" - f7
. .
. .
If the Agreement is terminated by the City as provided in this paragraph, Engineer
shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any satisfactory work
completed on such documents and other materials to the effective date of such
termination. Engineer hereby expressly waives any and all claims for damages or
compensation arising under this Agreement except as set forth in Section 3,
hereinabove, in the event of such termination. The use by City of any unfinished
documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, reports or other materials shall be
at City's sole risk and City shall hold harmless and indemnify Engineer from any suit,
loss, cost of defense, or liability resulting therefrom.
ASSIGNABILITY
SECTION 8
Engineer shall not assign any interest in this Agreement, and shall not transfer any
interest in the same (whether by assignment or novation), without prior written consent
of City; provided, however, that claims for money due or to become due to Engineer
from City under this Agreement may be assigned to a bank, trust company, or other
financial institution without such approval. Notice of such assignment or transfer shall
be furnished promptly to City. Any assignment requiring approval may not be further
assigned without City approval.
OWNERSHIP. PUBLICATION. REPRODUCTION AND USE OF MATERIAL
SECTION 9
All reports, studies, information, data, stallsllcs, forms, designs, plans, procedures,
systems, and any other materials or properties produced under this Agreement
(collectively "instruments of service") shall be the sole and exclusive property of the
City. No such materials or properties produced in whole or in part under this
Agreement shall be subject to private use, copyrights, or patent right by Engineer in
the United States or in any country without the express written consent of the City.
City shall have unrestricted authoritv to publish, disclose (as may be limited by the
provisions of the Public Records Act), distribute, and otherwise, use, copyright or
patent, in whole or in part, any such reports, studies, data, statistics, forms or other
materials or properties produced under this Agreement. Any reuse of any such
instruments of service on any other project without the prior written consent of
Engineer shall be at City's sole risk and City shall hold harmless and indemnify
Engineer from any suit, loss, cost of defense, or liability resulting therefrom.
12
36231.CON:js
I~ - r1'
INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
SECTION 10
City is interested only in the results obtained, and Engineer shall perform as an
independent contractor with sole control of the manner and means of performing the
services required under the Agreement. City maintains the right only to reject or
accept Engineer's final work product as each phase of this Agreement is completed.
Engineer and any 9f Engineer's agents, employees, or representatives are, for all
purposes under this Agreement, an independent contractor, and shall not be deemed
to be an employee of City, and none of them shall'be entitled to any benefits to which
City employees are entitled, including, hut not limited to, overtime, retirement benefits,
worker's compensation benefits, injury leave, or other leave benefits.
CHANGES
SECTION 11
City may, from time to time, require changes in the scope of services by Engineer to
be performed under this Agreement. Such changes, including any increase or decrease
in the amount of Engineer's compensation, which are mutually agreed upon by City
and Engineer, shall be effective only when executed in writing by both parties as
amendments to this agreement.
INSURANCE
SECTION 12
Engineer shall maintain, during the term of this Agreement, the following insurance
with companies and on terms satisfactory to City.
A. Worker's Compensation and Employer's Liability Insurance as prescribed by
applicable law.
.
B. Comprehensive General Liability Insurance (bodily injury and property damage)
in the amount of $1,000,000 occurrence and annual aggregate.
C. Automobile hodily Injury and property damage liability insurance, the limits of
which shall not be less than $1 ,(JOO,OOO per occurrence.
D. City shall be named as an additional insured on each of the above policies.
13
36231. CO N :js
,,- J9
. .
.'
.
.
E. Design professional liability insurance covering negligent act, errors, or
omissions of Engineer, the limits of which shall not be less than One Million
Dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit per occurrence and aggregate.
F. Before commencing work hereunder, Engineer shall provide City with
certificates or other documentary evidence of the above insurance.
INDEMNIFICATION
SECTION 13
Engineer agrees to save, keep, and hold harmless the City of Chula Vista from all
damages, costs. or expenses in law and equity including costs of suit and expenses for
legal services that may at any time arise or be set up because of damage to property
or injury to persons receIved or suffered by reason of the operation of Engineer which
may be occasioned by any negligent error, act or omission or intentional tortious
conduct by Engineer, his agents, subcontractors, employees, or servants in connection
with his services under this agreement.
No suit shall be brought arising out of this agreement, against the City, unless a claim
has first been presented in writing and filed with the City of Chula Vista and acted
upon by the City of Chula Vista in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter
1.34 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, the provisions of which are incorporated by
this reference as if fully set forth herein.
.
14
36231.CON:js
I' - !}.c)
,/
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Engineer have executed this Agreement on
this _ day of , 1990,
THE CITY OF CHUlA VISTA
~l~
Mayor of e 'ty of Chula Vista
ATTEST
Approved as to form by:
\'ivC'l ( Ul, /\
/f4)f- City Attorney
.
I) - ~ (
WILLDAN ASSOCIATES
15
3623 LCON:js
RESOLUTION NO. It! l('3
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
AGREEMENT WITH WILLDAN ASSOCIATES FOR
ASSESSMENT ENGINEERING SERVICES RENDERED FOR
THE OTAY VALLEY ROAD ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 90-2,
AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN SAID
AMENDMENT
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
approved
services
District
89-3; and
WHEREAS, on May 22,1990, by Resolution 15627, council
an agreement with willdan Associates for consulting
as assessment engineer for otay Valley Road Assessment
90-2 and otay Rio Business Park Assessment District
WHEREAS, staff recommends approval of the first
amendment to the contract for a proposed expanded scope of work
and includes an increase in the contract amount; and
WHEREAS, adequate funds have already been appropr ia ted
by the Redevelopment Agency for this CIP project which will also
cover the proposed increase in compensation for the additional
work (996-9960-ST123)
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula Vista does hereby approve the First Amendment
to the Agreement with willdan Associates for Assessment
Engineering Services rendered for the otay Valley Road Assessment
District 90-2, a copy of which is on file in the office of the
City Clerk.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor
Chula Vista is hereby authorized and directed
Amendment for and on behalf of the City of Chula
of the Ci ty of
to execute said
vista.
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public works
8937a
Presented by
JA-:J.lf
FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT
OTAY VALLEY ROAD
This First Amendment to Agreement is entered into this _ day of June, 1991, by
and between the City of Chula Vista (hereinafter referred to as "CITY"), and Willdan
Associates (hereinafter referred to as "ENGINEER").
WITNESSETH
WHEREAS, on May 22, 1990, pursuant to Resolution No. 15627, CITY and ENGINEER
entered into an Agreement for consulting services involving the improvement of Otay
Valley Road and the public improvements associated with the Otay Rio Business Park;
and
WHEREAS, CITY has requested ENGINEER to perform additional tasks and gather
additional information relative to completion of the Scope of Services and such
additions will require an amendment to the Scope of Services; and
WHEREAS, CITY is desirous of having ENGINEER complete the additional tasks within
the Scope of Services of this amended Agreement which are necessary to accomplish
the Otay Valley Road Assessment District.
Now, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY MUTUALLY AGREED by and between the parties
hereto that the original Agreement is hereby amended as follows:
SCOPE OF SERVICES
SECTION 1
Section 1 of the original Agreement is amended to increase ENGINEER'S responsibili-
ties by adding Otay Valley Road Phase II to the work being undertaken. Subsection
B. Assessment Engineering: Subdivision 1 is amended to read:
"1. Otay Valley Road - Phases I and II".
SF2\Conrract\36231. Con \5-30-91
" - ~6
FEE FOR SERVICES
SECfION 2
Section 2 Schedule of Work is amended to add estimated time for completion of
assessment district proceedings regarding Otay Valley Road Phase II. Subdivision 4
is amended to read:
"4. Section 1-B-1, Otay Valley Road - Phases I and II assessment
district proceedings. Commence July 1990 - complete December
1991".
SECfION 3
Section 3 of the original agreement is amended to add a lump sum fee of $14,500 for
the addition of Phase II as identified in Subsection B.1. Section 3D of the original
agreement is amended to read:
"For services performed under Section 1-B-1 for Phases I and II, the lump
sum fee of $48,500, payable in monthly progress payments based on
percentage of the work completed."
SECfION 4
All other provisions of the original Agreement dated May 22, 1990, shall remain in full
force and effect except the additions or deletions set forth above.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CITY and ENGINEER have executed this Agreement on this
day of June, 1991.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
WILLDAN AsSOCIATES
Mayor
d~," om >>
SF2IConrract\36231. Con \5-30-91
1:z-:tG.
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item I ~
Meeting Date___ ~
ITEM TITLE: Resol ution ,I."f Approving "Fourth Amendment to the
Agreement between the City of Chul a Vi sta, the City of San
Diego, and the Spring Valley Sanitation District of the County
of San Diego, for the Use Of.D~ict's Outfall Sewer."
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public WOrk~(~
REVIEWED BY: City Managerf~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No...!....)
On August 7, 1990, the City Council approved the installation of seven sewage
flow meters at City connections to the Spring Valley Sanitation District sewer
1 i nes. Our exi st i ng agreement for the use of the Di stri ct' s outfall sewer
must be revised to include necessary provisions for the operation and
ma i ntenance of these sewage meteri ng stat ions and to cl arify the method of
determining service charges for metered and unmetered sewage flows discharged
by Chula Vista into District lines.
RECOMMENDATION: That council adopt the resolution as stated in the title
hereto.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable
DISCUSSION:
On March 9th, 1964, by contract 2624-2125-R of the County of San Diego (as
previously approved by Chula Vista City Council Resolution No. 3262), the City
of Chula Vista (City) entered into an agreement with the City of San Diego and
the Spring Valley Sanitation District of the County of San Diego, for the use
of the District's Spring Valley Outfall Sewer. This agreement was
subsequently revi sed three times. The fi rst amendment, revi si ng Sect ion 12,
"SERVICE CHARGE," was executed on 2/16/71, to increase the sewer service
charge payable to Spring Valley for the maintenance and operation of the San
Diego Metropol itan Sewer System. Amendment two was executed on 4/24/79 and
revi sed Sect i on 12 again on the method of ca 1 cul at i ng charges payabl e to
Spring Valley. The third amendment was executed on 7/17/79 to extend the life
of the contract until March 9, 1994.
The City is currently discharging sewage into the Spring Valley Outfall Sewer
at 11 different locations. On August 7, 1990, by Resolution 15754, the City
Counci 1 approved a contract with Ameri can Di gita 1 Systems (ADS) Servi ce for
the installation of sewage flow meters at seven of the eleven locations. The
flow to be metered at these sites represents approximately 90% of the total
sewage discharged into the District's system.
The i nsta 11 at i on of the sewage flow meters by Chul a Vi sta wi 11 requi re that
the current agreement with Spring Valley be revised to include provisions for
the operation and maintenance of the metering stations. The original contract
specified that Spring Valley would be responsible for the operation and
13-1
j
Page 2, Item_., r~
Meeting Date___' ____
maintenance of any metering station, and for rendering reports of the metered
flow to Chula Vista. However, since Chula Vista is installing the meters, it
is desirable for the City to retain control of the metering stations, and
contract directly with ADS services for operation and maintenance of the
meters. Flow data information will be made available to the District through
direct monitoring, and to the District and the City of San Diego through
quarterly reports provided by the City of Chula Vista. These conditions were
revised in Section 8.
Sections 12 and 13(a)(3) of the agreement were revised to define the method of
determi ni ng servi ce charges for metered and unmetered sewage flows, and to
introduce the term "equivalent dwelling unit" respectively. Section 22, on
Indemnity and Insurance, was revised to reflect the current Chula Vista
insurance provisions.
Metered sewage flows will be billed on the basis of 110 percent of the amount
San Diego charges Spring Valley per million gallons discharged.
The installation of the sewage flow meters is nearing completion. Staff
expects to start collecting data from these sites in July 1991. Chula Vista
will need to enter into a maintenance agreement with ADS services at that time.
The Ci ty of San Di ego, the Spri ng Valley Sani tat ion Di stri ct and the City
Attorney have revi ewed the proposed agreement, and thei r comments have been
incorporated in the amendment. The other agencies will take our signed
agreement to their respective legislative bodies for approval, first to San
Diego, then to Spring Valley.
FISCAL IMPACT: Measurements performed by the Ci ty in 1987 in ten 1 ocat ions
indicated that billed flows may be 15-20% too high. For Fiscal Year 1988-89,
the City paid Spring Valley a total of $373,428.56. Since approximately 90%
of the total discharged flow will be metered, a minimum of $50,000 should be
saved by using flow meters. Additional savings can be expected due to
increasing Metro System charges and reduced sewage flows resulting from water
conservation.
WPC 5619E
)" -1./13 -/0
I~I q t(
RESOLUT ION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING FOURTH AMENDMENT TO THE
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, THE
CITY OF SAN DIEGO, AND THE SPRING VALLEY
SANITATION DISTRICT OF THE COUNTY OF SAN
DIEGO, FOR THE USE OF DISTRICT'S OUTFALL
SEWER, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE
SAID AGREEMENT
The City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, on August 7, 1990, the City Council approved
the installation of seven sewage flow meters at City connections
to the Spring Valley Sanitation District sewer lines; and
WHEREAS, the existing agreement for the use of the
District's outfall sewer must be revised to include necessary
provisions for the operation and maintenance of these sewage
metering stations and to clarify the method of determining
service charges for metered and unmetered sewage flows discharged
by Chula Vista into District lines.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula vista does hereby approve the Fourth Amendment
to the Agreement between the City of Chula Vista, the City of San
Diego, and the Spring Valley Sanitation District of the County of
San Diego, for the Use of Dis tr ict 's Outfall Sewer, a copy of
which is on file in the office of the City Clerk.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of
Chula Vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said
Agreement for and on behalf of the City of Chula Vista.
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
/
~uce
I~
Presented by
8917a
I'~ -II
k)y>,{
(C" l.
:_"-1
I",
From the Office of the City Attorney
City of Chula vista
Memorandum
Date:
June 15, 1991
From:
Bruce M. Boogaard, City Attorney
To:
Honorable Mayor and Councilmembers
Re:
Spring Valley Sanitation District/Chula Vista/San Diego
Agreement, Fourth Amendment
Recommendation:
Approve and authorize execution of the attached
agreement in lieu of the one in your Council Agenda
Package.
Reason:
Since the last time the agreements were thoroughly looked at
by the Spring Valley Sanitation District, the District has become
"self-insured" (perhaps a eupheJllism for 'uninsured').
Accordingly, they proposed deletion of their duty to carry
insurance.
As a trade-off, the District has no objection to deleting
our duty to carry insurance.
The attached agreement differs from the one in the Council
Notebook by virtue of the fact that both parties duty to carry
insurance is deleted.
(
The Risk Manager has advised that no cases in recent history
(5 years) have involved risks associated the use of the Spring
Valley sewer system by Chula vista.
svsdl.wp
June 15, 1991
Fourth Amendment to Spring Valley Sewage Agreement
Page 9
1"3 ~ 1'-
FOURTH AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, THE CITY OF
SAN DIEGO AND THE SPRING VALLEY SANITATION
DISTRICT OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO FOR
THE USE OF DISTRICT'S OUTFALL SEWER
THIS AGREEMENT FOR A FOURTH AMENDMENT modifying section 8
"Metering", Section 12 "Service Charge", section 13 "Charge Against
Capacity Rights," and section 22 "Indemnity - Insurance" of the
County of San Diego Contract 2624-2125-R is made and entered into
this 18th day of June, 1991, by and between the City of Chula
Vista, a Municipal Corporation, the City of San Diego, a Municipal
Corporation; and the Spring Valley Sanitation District, a County
Sanitation District.
WITNESSETH:
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
The purpose of this agreement is to revise the basic contract
between Chula vista and the Spring Valley Sanitation District to
include necessary provisions for the operation and maintenance of
sewage metering stations installed by the City of Chula vista and
to clarify the method of determining the service charge for metered
and unmetered sewage flows discharged by Chula vista into Spring
Valley Sanitation District lines. However, except as amended
specifically herein, the provisions of this agreement and its
amendments thereto shall be and remain unaffected by the provisions
of this Fourth Amendment. In accordance with the above stated
purpose, sections 8, 12, 13 and 22 of Contract 2624-2125-R are
amended in the following particulars:
1. section 8, Metering, is hereby amended to read as
follows:
"If at any time during the term of this agreement the
daily flow of sewage into District's outfall sewer from
Chula vista's sewer lines increases to a point where it
is deemed necessary or desirable by the District to
measure all or a portion of such flow, the District shall
make written demand on Chula vista that Chula vista
install any and all such meters as the District deems
necessary or desirable.
within 365 days after receipt of such demand, Chula vista
shall, at its sole expense, install such meters at the
locations specified by the District. Said meters and
installation shall be respectively of a type and
installed in a manner approved by District's Engineer.
svsdl.wp
June 15, 1991
Fourth Amendment to Spring Valley Sewage Agreement
Page 1
/3 -13
At its own discretion and upon approval by the District
Chula vista may install meters in lines maintained by the
District or the City of Chula vista to measure all or any
portion of the sewage discharged into District's outfall
sewer from Chula Vista's connections to said sewer.
Such meters as are installed will be operated and
maintained by the City of Chula vista and be in good
working condition for the duration of this agreement.
Flow data information obtained from such meters will be
made available to the District through direct monitoring
and to the District and the City of San Diego through
quarterly reports provided by the City of Chula vista."
2. section 12, Service Charge, is hereby amended to read as
follows:
"(a) Unmetered Connection. Chula vista shall pay to the
District a monthly service charge ("Monthly Service
Charge"). Such Monthly Service Charge shall be calcu-
lated by the District as follows: 110% of the rate which
the City of San Diego charges the District for sewage
discharge into the Metropolitan System ("Metro Rate")
times the number of Equivalent Dwelling units ("EDU's)
within the corporate boundaries of Chula vista connected
to sewer lines which empty into the unmetered connections
of the District's outfall (CVEDU's) times 265 gallons per
CVEDU, and represented mathematically by the following
equation:
Monthly
110% * Metro Rate * No of CVEDU's * 265 Gallons/CVEDU = Service
Charge
This Monthly Service Charge shall be applicable to all
family units, commercial, industrial and any other type
of users within the City of Chula vista that are served
by a sewer system connected to the District's outfall
sewer. The service charge shall be based on a flow of
265 gallons per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (herein after
referred to as "EDU") or the flow rate determined in
accordance with subparagraph (f) below and computed as
follows:
1) The term "family unit" as used in this
agreement shall mean a single family dwelling
unit or each single family dwelling unit in a
duplex, multiple dwelling or apartment house.
svsdl.wp
June 15, 1991
Fourth Amendment to Spring Valley Sewage Agreement
Page 2
Ii -11
svsdl.wp
June 15, 1991
The number of EDU's for each category of
"family unit" shall be assigned by Chula vista
and approved by District. Where a hotel,
motel, trailer court, commercial or industrial
establishment or other type of enterprise or
operation which normally generates a larger
volume of sewage than a single family dwelling
is being served by District's outfall sewer;
Chula Vista, with approval of the District,
shall assign to each such establishment,
enterprise or operation a number of EDUs in
proportion to the estimated amount of sewage
generated. Said number of EDUs so assigned
shall be used in computing the amount of
sewage discharged into the District's outfall
sewer. Said assignment shall be made for each
such establishment, enterprise or operation
being served by District's outfall sewer on
the date when sewage is first discharged from
Chula vista's sewers into District's outfall
sewer under the terms of this agreement.
Thereafter, upon the connection of any such
establishment, enterprise or operation to a
sewer line being served by District's outfall
sewer, or upon the change in use of any
property within Chula vista which is served by
District's outfall sewer, which changes in use
would affect the volume of sewage generated by
such property, Chula vista shall report to the
District and the City of San Diego the date of
such connection or change in use and assign an
appropriate number of Equivalent Dwelling
units to such property with approval of the
District's Engineer.
2) Chula vista shall report to the District and
the City of San Diego quarterly the number of
Equivalent Dwelling units within Chula vista
being served by District's outfall sewer for
all unmetered connections to said outfall
sewer.
3) The service charge for each month shall be
based upon the number of Equivalent Dwelling
units being served at the commencement of the
quarter within which such month falls, for all
unmetered connections.
Fourth Amendment to Spring Valley Sewage Agreement
Page 3
)3 -1-'
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
svsd1.wp
June 15, 1991
Metered Connections. At such time as and to the
extent that meters are installed pursuant to
section 8 of this agreement, the provisions of
subparagraph (a) shall be superseded by this
subparagraph (b) as to such metered connections and
Chula vista shall pay to District, in lieu of the
amounts determined by said subparagraph (a), a
service charge per million gallons of sewage
received by the District I s outfall sewer through
Chula vista's metered connections to said outfall
sewer which amounts shall include a proportionate
share of the infiltration allocable to Chula vista
in accordance with section 10 of this agreement.
said charge shall be 110% of the amount the city of
San Diego charges the Spring Valley Sanitation
District per million gallons of sewage discharged
by the District into the Metropolitan System under
the aforesaid Sewage Disposal Agreement of 1960.
District shall invoice Chula vista quarterly for
the amount of sewage discharged into District I s
outfall sewer. Chula vista shall report this
quantity to the City of San Diego.
It is understood by the parties hereto that the
service charge rate of 110% of the maintenance and
operation costs ("M & Oil) of the Metropolitan
Sewerage System shall be based on the latest
estimate of such costs as provided by the city of
San Diego; provided, however, that the amount of
the last installment of the fiscal year shall be
subject to adjustment to reflect actual Metro M & 0
costs for that fiscal year. In case of underpay-
ment the balance shall be due and payable within
thirty (30) days following receipt of notice of
actual Metro M & 0 costs from the City of San
Diego.
Service charges computed by the District in
accordance with either subparagraph (a) or (b) or
both, shall be paid quarterly by Chula Vista to the
District within thirty (30) days after presentation
of a bill for said charges by District.
It is understood by the parties hereto that the
service charge computed pursuant to either
subparagraphs (a) or (b) is to cover (1) the
District's prorated share of the maintenance and
operations cost of the San Diego Metropolitan
Sewerage System which the District must pay to the
Fourth Amendment to Spring Valley Sewage Agreement
Page 4
13 -If.,
city of San Diego under the terms of the
aforementioned "Sewage Disposal Agreement of 1960"
between the District and the City of San Diego,
plus (2) a share of the District's costs in
maintaining and operating the District's outfall
sewer. The service charge as computed in
subparagraphs (a) or (b) will automatically adjust
for any increase or decrease in the Metropolitan
Sewerage System charges. However, the service
charge rate may be increased or decreased from time
to time by the District in direct proportion to any
increase or decrease in the cost to the District in
maintaining said outfall sewer by amending County
of San Diego Contract No. 2624-2125-R. A copy of
the District's Annual Audit Report shall be
furnished to Chula vista upon request.
(f) To the extent that flow meters are installed
pursuant to section 8 of this agreement, the unit
flow of 265 gallons per day per equivalent dwelling
unit mentioned in subparagraph (a) shall be
reviewed after two years of data compilation. At
the end of this period, if requested by the city of
Chula Vista, the District and the City shall
establish a new average flow rate based on actual
metered flow which shall be used and reviewed
annually thereafter in computing the monthly
service charge for unmetered connections."
3. section 13 (a)(3) shall be amended to read as follows:
"That portion of said sewage not measured by meters shall
be determined by the Equivalent Dwelling unit system as
specified in section 12 of this agreement. The average
number of Equivalent Dwelling units served daily under
the terms of this agreement shall be multiplied by 265
gallons or the flow rate determined in accordance with
subparagraph 12 (f) above. Said average shall be
computed by averaging the number of Equivalent Dwelling
units being served by the District's outfall sewer, as
reported quarterly during the fiscal year (as specified
in said "Sewage Disposal Agreement of 1960") by Chula
vista pursuant to section 12 of this agreement."
4. section 22. Indemnity - Insurance is hereby amended to
read as follows: -
"Chula vista Indemnitv. To the extent it may legally do
so, Chula vista shall defend and save and hold free and
harmless the District and its agents, officers and
employees from any claims, liabilities, penalties or
svsd1.wp
June 15, 1991
Fourth Amendment to Spring Valley Sewage Agreement
Page 5
1'3 -/7
fines for injury or damage to any person or property or
for the death of any person arising from or out of any
act or omission of Chula Vista, its agents, officers,
employees or contractors, arising from or out of any
defects in the installation, construction, operation,
maintenance, repair, replacement and/ or reconstruction of
said sewer connections and/or appurtenances, including
sewage flow meters installed according to section 8 of
this Agreement. P\i:FS\iaflt they-eta Ch\ila Vista ahall
maintain, thre~~hea~ the duration af ~hia ~~reemeftt, a
MemeraHsum af IBSUraftee fer publie liaeility eevcra~e te
preteet against leaa fram liasility i.peaed BY la~ for
damaEjes eft aeeeuRt. af 13eElily ifljary, inoludiflEJ deat.h
resulting t.herefrem, suffered ay alleged te 13e sufferea
sy any parseR ey peraeflB t...ftat.aee".~cr resalt.iftEj direetly ey
iRdiree~ly fram aft} aet af aetiviticc af Chula ~iDta er
afty peresR sat.iRE} fer Cauls ~iota er unaer Chuls vieta's
seRtrel ey dircotieR, ana alae t.e proteot against. any
less fram liabilit.y impeacEl sy 18\_. fer aamages te any
preperty of any pcraen eauoea direotly or indireetly by
or fram set.e er aotivities af Ch~la ~ista sr aRY ~ersen
ae~iR~ fer Ch~la vista sr ~Racr Chula vista's ean'tral er
dircetien. Eueh ~aslic liability ana ~ro~crty dama~c
iRS\iraRee shall BC maiRtaineEi iR t.he amsaRt. sf Sl, G99, 99G
esmBinca aiR~le limi~_ Eaid iReurancc ohall Be in ferm
sat.isfaetery ta t.he CeaRt.y Ca~Rsel af Ean Die~a CauRty_
'Fhe MemeranEl\:lm af InSaraRCt1 ElRal1 ha9:c a Ron
canecllat.ieR wit.heat teR (19) day Re'tiee t.a [)ist.riet.
claaac aRd shall ~ra~idc ~Ra~ espics af all eaReclla'tien
na'tieca shall Be sent. 1:6 [)iot.rie't. If Ohala ~iat.a daeo
Rat ]tCC~ a~eh Uemsranaam af IRs\;lraRoe in full force and
effee~, Diotrie't JB.a~i t.a]te e~'t t.he neeessar~i inourancc €lRd
pay ~hc premiam, ana each amounto 00 paid BY the [)iatriet
shall Be addcEl ta t.he maRthll aer.iee ehar~e aRB se paid
sy ~BC city iR aeeeraaRee \lith Eeet.ien 12 af t.hic
A~reem~nt as amended here t.s ana Be paid as Daeh sy Chula
'l."ieta en t.he l\el!~ as}- apan which rent secomes due.
District Indemnitv. To the extent it may legally do so,
District shall defend and save and hold free and harmless
Chula vista and its agents, officers and employees from
any claims, liabilities, penalties or fines for injury to
or damage to any person or property or for the death of
any person arising from or out of any act or omission of
District, its agents, officers, employees or contractors,
arising from or out of any defects in the installation,
construction, operation, maintenance, repair, replacement
and/or reconstruction of said sewer connections and/or
svsdl.wp
June 15, 1991
Fourth Amendment to Spring Valley Sewage Agreement
Page 6
13 -/~
appurtenances.
I"l:lrSliaR:E 'Eheret.e J;'Jia'trie"t BRall t.a]te 91:lt. aRa maiRtain
pllBlic liaeili"ty iliSl:1.raRee ......it-h all iRsarallee earrier
aatasrizea te ae sQaineaa iR the ~tate sf Califernia te
pr8~eet a~aiftat leas frem liasility impesea BY la~ fer
Elalllalje.a ell aeeeuftt. af 13eElily injury I iRelaEling death
reaal~iRIJ 'therefrem, safferea eE" allc~cd to Be suffered
By allY parseR eE' parseRS Yhatoeever re.s\il tiRIj dire.etl~i er
iftsireetly frem any aet BE' aeti~itica af District SE' aftY
perseR aet.ifuJ fer Diotriot af l:lfuie:r Distriet.. s aentrel eE'
ElireetisR, aRa alee t.e preteet. afJaiRot. aR~f leso fram
liabilit.y impeaed BY law fer damaljca te anyprepcrty af
afty peraeft eaasea diree~ly eE' indireotly BY BE" fram aeta
sf ae'ti7it.it:s af Diatriet. eE" allY perseft aet.ift'!J fer
Bis~rie~ ey ~Rdcr Diat.Fiet.'s eaRt.rel SF direet.ieR. Eaea
puslie liasili~y aRe preperty eama'!J6 i~DuFaRee shall S~
.aiR~aiftee iR fall ferae aRa cffee~ aarin'!J ~he eR~ire
~crm af t.his a'!Jrccmcftt ift the amounts af Rat lcas than
$$99,999 fer Bfte persaft iftjurea ift efts aeeiseRt. afts ftat.
less taaft $1,OeQ,9ge far mere than eRe peYSeR iRjures iR
eRe aeeieeRt aRa iR the amauftt ef fte~ lesa taaR $2Se,eee
with respeet te afty pFsperty asma'!Je aferesaia. Eaiel
iRsaraRee sRall Be iR ferm eatiafaotery to tRe City
At.t.erftey af 'thc city af Chuls vista.
Thc insuranee palieiea shall Ba7e a fteft eaftsellat.isft
wit.keat ten (19) day nstiee t.e Diatriet elauss afts shall
previse ~fta~ espies af all eaReellatieR Retiees saall so
aeRt. t.e Chula "."ista. If Oiotriet seeEl fte-e. l[eep such
iftSUraRee in full ferae aftB effeet, Caula vista may take
e~t t.he fteeessar~l illouraRee alld pal- the premium, aPiel sueh
a_eaRta 08 pais BY Caals vista saall Be aeauetcd fram the
acr?iee eharqeo payable ~e the Diotriot iR aaeerdanec
9.l\,.i t.a Eeetian 12 af this }..'!Jrssmsftt, aa amcRaeel herete. n
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment
to be executed by their respective officials.
svsdl.wp
June 15, 1991
Fourth Amendment to Spring Valley Sewage Agreement
Page 7
/3-/7
Signature Page to
Fourth Amendment to Agreement between the city of Chula Vista; the
city of San Diego, and the Spring Valley Sanitation District of the
County of San Diego for the use of District's outfall sewer to
modify section 8 "Metering" and section 12 "Service Charge"
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, city of Chula Vista, City of San Diego and
Spring Valley Sanitation District have executed this Agreement this
day of , 1990.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
BY:
Tim Nader
Mayor
Attest:
Beverly Authelet,
City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Bruce M. Boogaard,
City Attorney
City of San Diego
by:
Spring Valley Sanitation District
by:
svsd1 . wp
June 15, 1991
Fourth Amendment to Spring Valley Sewage Agreement
Page 8
} 3 - :22>
~~I?-
~
.......~~~
......""""--"'--
-.::...",-- ~
." \
,
CllY OF
CHULA VISTA
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
DATE:
October 24, 1991
FROM:
The Honorable Mayor and City coun~
John Goss, City Manager
Bruce M. Boogaard, city Attorney
Clerical Correction to Fourth Amendment to the
Spring Valley Sanitation Agreement
TO:
SUBJECT:
As a result of a question raised by the county of San Diego with
regard to the Fourth Amendment to the Agreement between the city of
Chula vista, city of San Diego and the Spring Valley Sanitation
District of the County of San Diego for the Use of District's
Outfall Sewer, it is appropriate to make a clerical correction in
the monthly formula rate language by which City is charged for
sewer access through Spring Valley to Metro to reflect that which
was actually intended by staff and Council, to-wit: 110% of the
Metro Rate, in dollars per million gallons, times the 265 gallons
per EDU per day times the number of days per month times the number
of Chula vista equivalent dwelling units attached to the sewer
line.
We concur with the clerical correction of the proper rate and
without any further request by a Councilmember, will make the
change clerically without further ado by the City Council.
BMB:lgk
cc: Elizabeth Chopp
~ii'1 ~Ie"'/<...
13 - c9..1
276 FOURTH AVE/CHULA VISTA. CALIFORNIA 91910/(619) 691-5037
FOURTH AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, THE CITY OF
SAN DIEGO AND THE SPRING VALLEY SANITATION
DISTRICT OF THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO FOR
THE USE OF DISTRICT'S OUTFALL SEWER
THIS AGREEMENT FOR A FOURTH AMENDMENT modifying section 8
"Metering", Section 12 "Service Charge", Section 13 "Charge Against
Capacity Rights," and Section 22 "Indemnity - Insurance" of the
County of San Diego Contract 2624-2125-R is made and entered into
this 18th day of June. 1991. by and between the City of Chula
Vista, a Municipal Corporation, the City of San Diego, a Municipal
Corporation; and the Spring Valley Sanitation District, a County
Sanitation District.
WITNESSETH:
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
The purpose of this agreement is to revise the basic contract
between Chula Vista and the Spring Valley Sanitation District to
include necessary provisions for the operation and maintenance of
sewage metering stations installed by the City of Chula Vista and
to clarify the method of determining the service charge for metered
and unmetered sewage flows discharged by Chula Vista into Spring
Valley Sanitation District lines. In accordance with the above
stated purpose, Sections 8, 12, 13 and 22 of Contract 2624-2125-R
are amended in the following particulars:
1. Section 8. Meterinq, is hereby amended to read as
follows:
"If at any time during the term of this agreement the
daily flow of sewage into District's outfall sewer from
Chula vista's sewer lines increases to a point where it
is deemed necessary or desirable by the District to
measure all or a portion of such flow, the District shall
make written demand on Chula Vista that Chula Vista
install any and all such meters as the District deems
necessary or desirable.
Within 365 days after receipt of such demand, Chula vista
shall, at its sole expense, install such meters at the
locations specified by the District. Said meters and
installation shall be respectively of a type and
installed in a manner approved by District's Engineer.
At its own discretion and upon approval by the District
svsd1.wp
June 10, 1991
Fourth Amendment to Spring Valley Sewage Agreement
Page 1
-/3 i /3-02:2.
Chula Vista may install meters in lines maintained by the
District or the City of Chula Vista to measure all or any
portion of the sewage discharged into District's outfall
sewer from Chula Vista's connections to said sewer.
Such meters as are installed will be operated and
maintained by the City of Chula vista and be in good
working condition for the duration of this agreement.
Flow data information obtained from such meters will be
made available to the District through direct monitoring
and to the District and the City of San Diego through
quarterly reports provided by the city of Chula Vista."
2. Section 12. Service Charae, is hereby amended to read as
follows:
"(a) Unmetered Connection. Chula Vista shall pay to the
District a monthly service charge ("Monthlv Service
Charae") based on the followina formula~ at a rate af
110% of the allla1:lftt rate which the City of San Diego
charges the District for sewage discharge into the
Metropolitan System ("Metro Rate". currentlY set at $560
oer million aallonsl times the number of Eauivalent
Dwellina units ("EDU'sl within the coroorate boundaries
of Chula Vista connected to sewer lines which emoty into
the unmetered connections of the District's outfall
(CVEDU'sl times 265 aallons oer CVEDU. and reoresented
mathematically bY the followina eauation:
MonthlY
110% * Metro Rate * No of CVEDU's * 265 Gallons/CVEDU = Service
Charae
This Monthlv Service ~harge shall be applicable to all
family units, commercial, industrial and any other type
of users within the City of Chula Vista that are served
by a sewer system connected to the District's outfall
sewer. The service charge shall be based on a flow of
265 gallons per Equivalent Dwelling Unit (herein after
referred to as "EDU") or the flow rate determined in
accordance with subparagraph (f) below and computed as
, follows:
1) The term "family unit" as used in this
agreement shall mean a single family dwelling
unit or each single family dwelling unit in a
duplex, multiple dwelling or apartment house.
The number of EDU' S for each category of
svsd1.wp
June 10, 1991
Fourth Amendment to Spring Valley Sewage Agreement
Page 2
~ 15-~3
"family unit" shall be assigned by Chula Vista
and approved by District. Where a hotel,
motel, trailer court, commercial or industrial
establishment or other type of enterprise or
operation which normally generates a larger
volume of sewage than a single family dwelling
is being served by District's outfall sewer;
Chula Vista, with approval of the District,
shall assign to each such establishment,
enterprise or operation a number of EDUs in
proportion to the estimated amount of sewage
generated. Said number of EDUs so assigned
shall be used in computing the amount of
sewage discharged into the District's outfall
sewer. Said assignment shall be made for each
such establishment, enterprise or operation
being served by District's outfall sewer on
the date when sewage is first discharged from
Chula vista's sewers into District's outfall
sewer under the terms of this agreement.
Thereafter, upon the connection of any such
establishment, enterprise or operation to a
sewer line being served by District's outfall
sewer, or upon the change in use of any
property within Chula vista which is served by
District's outfall sewer, which changes in use
would affect the volume of sewage generated by
such property, Chula Vista shall report to the
District and the City of San Diego the date of
such connection or change in use and assign an
appropriate number of Equivalent Dwelling
units to such property with approval of the
District's Engineer.
2) Chula Vista shall report to the District and
the City of San Diego quarterly the number of
Equivalent Dwelling Units within Chula vista
being served by District's outfall sewer for
all unmetered connections to said outfall
sewer.
3) The service charge for each month shall be
based upon the number of Equivalent Dwelling
Units being served at the commencement of the
quarter within which such month falls, for all
unmetered connections.
(b) Metered Connections. At such time as and to the
svsd1.wp
June 10, 1991
Fourth Amendment to Spring Valley Sewage Agreement
Page 3
+35
13- J Lf
(c)
(d)
(e)
svsd1.wp
June 10, 1991
extent that meters are installed pursuant to
section 8 of this agreement, the provisions of
subparagraph (a) shall be superseded by this
subparagraph (b) as to such metered connections and
Chula Vista shall pay to District, in lieu of the
amounts determined by said subparagraph (a), a
service charge per million gallons of sewage
received by the District's outfall sewer through
Chula Vista's metered connections to said outfall
sewer which amounts shall include a proportionate
share of the infiltration allocable to Chula Vista
in accordance with Section 10. of this agreement.
Said charge shall be 110% of the amount the City of
San Diego charges the Spring Valley Sanitation
District per million gallons of sewage discharged
by the District into the Metropolitan System under
the aforesaid Sewage Disposal Agreement of 1960.
District shall invoice Chula Vista quarterly for
the amount of sewage discharged into District I s
outfall sewer. Chula vista shall report this
quantity to the City of San Diego.
It is understood by the parties hereto that the
service charge rate of 110% of the maintenance and
operation costs (11M & 0") of the Metropolitan
Sewerage System shall be based on the latest
estimate of such costs as provided by the City of
San Diego; provided, however, that the amount of
the last installment of the fiscal year shall be
subject to adjustment to reflect actual Metro M & 0
costs for that fiscal year. In case of underpay-
ment the balance shall be due and payable within
thirty (30) days following receipt of notice of
actual Metro M & 0 costs from the City of San
Diego.
Service charges computed by the District in
accordance with either subparagraph (a) or (b) or
both, shall be paid quarterly by Chula Vista to the
District within thirty (30) days after presentation
of a bill for said charges by District.
It is understood by the parties hereto that the
service charge computed pursuant to ei ther
subparagraphs (a) or (b) is to cover (1) the
District's prorated share of the maintenance and
operations cost of the San Diego Metropolitan
Sewerage System which the District must pay to the
City of San Diego under the terms of the
Fourth Amendment to Spring Valley Sewage Agreement
Page 4
-t3-+ 13'-~
aforementioned "Sewage Disposal Agreement of 1960"
between the District and the city of San Diego,
plus (2) a share of the District's costs in
maintaining and operating the District's outfall
sewer. The service charge as computed in
subparagraphs (a) or (b) will automatically adjust
for any increase or decrease in the Metropolitan
Sewerage System charges. However, the service
charge rate may be increased or decreased from time
to time by the District in direct proportion to any
increase or decrease in the cost to the District in
maintaining said outfall sewer by amending County
of San Diego Contract No. 2624-2125-R. A copy of
the District's Annual Audit Report shall be
furnished to Chula Vista upon request.
(f) To the extent that flow meters are installed
pursuant to section 8 of this agreement, the unit
flow of 265 gallons per day per equivalent dwelling
unit mentioned in subparagraph (a) shall be
reviewed after two years of data compilation. At
the end of this period, if requested by the City,
the District and the City shall establish a new
average flow rate based on actual metered flow
which shall be used and reviewed annually
thereafter in computing the monthly service charge
for unmetered connections."
3. section 13 (a) (3) shall be amended to read as follows:
"That portion of said sewage not measured by meters shall
be determined by the Equivalent Dwelling unit system as
specified in section 12 of this agreement. The average
number of Equivalent Dwelling Units served daily under
the terms of this agreement shall be multiplied by 265
gallons or the flow rate determined in accordance with
subparagraph 12 (f) above. Said average shall be
computed by averaging the number of Equivalent Dwelling
units being served by the District's outfall sewer, as
reported quarterly during the fiscal year (as specified
in said "Sewage Disposal Agreement of 1960") by Chula
vista pursuant to section 12 of this agreement."
4. Section 22. Indemnitv - Insurance is hereby amended to
read as follows:
"To the extent it may legally do so, Chula vista shall
defend and save and hold free and harmless the District
and its agents, officers and employees from any claims,
liabilities, penalties or fines for injury or damage to
any person or property or for the death of any person
svsd1. wp
June 10, 1991
Fourth Amendment to Spring Valley Sewage Agreement
Page 5
'13-7 I~-Ol(..
arising from or out of any act or omission of Chula
Vista, its agents, officers, employees or contractors,
arising from or out of any defects in the installation,
construction, operation, maintenance, repair, replacement
and/or reconstruction of said sewer connections and/or
appurtenances, including sewage flow meters installed
according to Section 8 of this Agreement. Pursuant
thereto Chula Vista shall maintain, throughout the
duration of this Agreement, a Memorandum of Insurance for
public liability coverage to protect against loss from
liability imposed by law for damages on account of bodily
injury, including death resulting therefrom, suffered or
alleged to be suffered by any person or persons
whatsoever resulting directly or indirectly from any act
of activities of Chula Vista or any person acting for
Chula Vista or under Chula Vista's control or direction,
and also to protect against any loss from liability
imposed by law for damages to any property of any person
caused directly or indirectly by or from acts or
activities of Chula Vista or any person acting for Chula
Vista or under Chula vista's control or direction. Such
public liability and property damage insurance shall be
maintained in the amount of $1,000,000 combined single
limit. Said insurance shall be in form satisfactory to
the County Counsel of San Diego County.
The Memorandum of Insurance shall have a non-
cancellation-without-ten (10) day-notice-to-District
clause and shall provide that copies of all cancellation
notices shall be sent to District. If Chula vista does
not keep such Memorandum of Insurance in full force and
effect, District may take out the necessary insurance and
pay the premium, and such amounts so paid by the District
shall be added to the monthly service charge and be paid
by the city in accordance with Section 12 of this
Agreement as amended here to and be paid as such by Chula
Vista on the next day upon which rent becomes due.
To the extent it may legally do so, District shall defend
and save and hold free and harmless Chula vista and its
agents, officers and employees from any claims,
liabilities, penalties or fines for injury to or damage
to any person or property or for the death of any person
arising from or out of any act or omission of District,
its agents, officers, employees or contractors, arising
from or out of any defects in the installation,
construction, operation, maintenance, repair, replacement
and/or reconstruction of said sewer connections and/or
appurtenances.
svsd1.wp
June 10, 1991
Fourth Amendment to Spring Valley Sewage Agreement
Page 6
+3 ~ 1~-~7
Pursuant thereto District shall take out and maintain
public liability insurance with an insurance carrier
authorized to do business in the State of California to
protect against loss from liability imposed by law for
damages on account of bodily injury, including death
resulting therefrom, suffered or alleged to be suffered
by any person or persons whatsoever resulting directly or
indirectly from any act or activities of District or any
person acting for District of under District's control or
direction, and also to protect against any loss from
liability imposed by law for damages to any property of
any person caused directly or indirectly by or from acts
of activities of District or any person acting for
District or under District's control or direction. Such
public liability and property damage insurance shall be
maintained in full force and effect during the entire
term of this agreement in the amounts of not less than
$500,000 for one person injured in one accident and not
less than $1,000,000 for more than one person injured in
one accident and in the amount of not less than $250,000
with respect to any property damage aforesaid. Said
insurance shall be in form satisfactory to the city
Attorney of the City of Chula Vista.
The insurance policies shall have a non-cancellation-
without-ten (10) day-notice-to-District clause and shall
provide that copies of all cancellation notices shall be
sent to Chula vista. If District does not keep such
insurance in full force and effect, Chula vista may take
out the necessary insurance and pay the premium, and such
amounts so paid by Chula Vista shall be deducted from the
service charges payable to the District in accordance
with Section 12 of this Agreement, as amended hereto."
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment
to be executed by their respective officials.
svsd1. wp
June 10, 1991
Fourth Amendment to Spring Valley Sewage Agreement
Page 7
~ 13-tJ~
-'-
Signature Page to
Fourth Amendment to Agreement between the City of Chula Vista; the
City of San Diego, and the Spring Valley Sanitation District of the
County of San Diego for the use of District's outfall sewer to
modify section 8 "Metering" and Section 12 "Service Charge"
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City of Chula Vista, City of San Diego and
Spring Valley Sanitation District have executed this Agreement this
day of , 1990.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
BY:
Tim Nader
Mayor
Attest:
/
City of San Diego
by:
Spring Valley Sanitation District
by:
svsd1.wp
June 10, 1991
Fourth Amendment to Spring Valley Sewage Agreement
Page 8
r3
Ii) )~-:29
f
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
ItemJ1--
Meeting Date 6/18/91
ITEM TITLE: Resolution I(,'J.O'/J Accepting bids and awarding contract
for "Widening of Telegraph Canyon Road/Otay Lakes Road from
Apache Dri ve to Rutgers Avenue and Channel Improvements" in
the City of Chula Vista, CA
SUBMITTED BY: Di rector of Publ ic work;Jf ~
REVIEWED BY: City Manager r (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No-1L)
At 2:00 p.m. on June 12, 1991, in Conference Rooms 2 and 3 in the Public
Services Building, the Director of Public Works received sealed bids for
"Widening of Telegraph Canyon Road/Otay lakes Road from Apache Drive to
Rutgers Avenue and Channel Improvements" in the City of Chula Vista, CA. A
general description of the work to be done is as follows: clearing of site,
preparation of subgrade, grading, placing of asphalt concrete on imported base
material or recycled AC material, the construction of PCC curb, gutter,
sidewalk and pedestrian ramps, crib walls, irrigation system, and landscaping,
pavement markers, traffic signals and safety lighting systems, traffic
interconnect conduit, construction of underground and open channel drainage
improvements, water and sewer hcil ities, and underground util ities (gas and
electric).
RECOMMENDATION: That Council accept bids and award contract to Erreca's
Inc. in the amount of $4,697,582 (Base Bid #1: $4,095,609 plus Base Bid #2
$661,973 minus deductive alternate $60,000).
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
Bids were received from five contractors as follows:
Contractor Base Bid #1 Base Bid #2 Deductive Grand Total
Erreca's Inc. - $4,095,609.00 $661,973.00 $ 60,000.00 $4,697,582.00
Spring Valley
Southland Paving, $4,109,057.73 0 0 $4,109,057.73*
Inc., - Escondido
Cass Construction $4,221,008.54 $778,863.25 $ 19,300.00 $4,980,571.79
Inc., - El Cajon
Commercial $4,392,697.25 $697,994.00 0 $5,090,691. 25
Contractors, Inc. -
Drainage Construction $5,229,139.42 $999,449.80 $155,000.00 $6,073,589.22
Co., Inc. -
The contract i ncl uded two base bids. Base Bi d #1 i ncl uded all of the work
required to be done by the City of Chula Vista as part of constructing
Telegraph Canyon Road and Otay Lakes Road. Base Bid #2 included work desired
IJ../- /
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date 6/18/91
to be accomplished by Otay Water District. The City also included a deductive
item in the bi d. The deduct i ve item was for 1 oweri ng the combi ned cost of
Base Bid #1 and #2 if the contractor was awarded both bids. Listed above is a
summary of the bid results. One contractor, Southland Paving Inc., only bid
on Base Bid #1. However, they were not the low bidder for that item.
The low bidder for both Base Bid #1 and Base Bid #2 was Erreca's Inc. Their
combined low bid of $4,697,582, is below the Engineer's estimate of
$6,402,697.15 by $1,705,115.15 or 26.6%. We have reviewed the low bid and
find it to be excellent and recommend awarding the contract to Erreca's Inc.
At the time this A-113 was being prepared, staff was working with Otay Water
District in obtaining their approval to award the contract. The City Council
approved an agreement with Otay Water District on 2/5/91 by Resolution No.
16043 which stipulates that Otay Water District must approve the award of the
contract. Lyman Chri stopher, Fi nance Di rector, is work; ng with Otay Water
Di stri ct in sett i ng up an escrow account for fundi ng thei r port i on of the
work. In addit ion, the City is pursui ng authori zat i on from Ca lTrans to award
the contract at tonight's meeting. The financial statement presumes that Otay
Water District will be depositing funds in an escrow account for use in the
construction of their water facilities.
The Director of Public Works will be making an oral presentation at the
meeting giving the precise status of this project. This project is el igible
for partial reimbursement of the project costs from SB 300 funds which the
City has app 1 i ed for under Cycle 1 of the program. The program is current 1 y
reimbursing 25% of the eligible projects costs which amounts to approximately
$318,000. For this project to qual ify for the Cycle 1 funds, the contract
must be awarded prior to June 30, 1991.
FINANCIAL STATEMENT:
Funds Reauired for Construction
a. Contract Amount
b. Water Facilities (meters)
c. Staff Expenses (10%)
d. Contingencies (approx. 5%)
Total Funds for Construction
$4,697,582.00
155,000.00
469,758.20
234.879.80
$5,557,220.00
Funds Available for Construction
a. Funds in Escrow Account with Otay Water District $ 761,269.00
b. FAU Funds 1,455,476.00
c. Defense Access Funds 1,431,000.00
d. Otay Lakes Road - Rutgers to Apache (DIF account 1,855,200.00
for construction)
e. Otay Lakes Road - Rutgers to Apache (DIF account 854.800.00
for contingencies)
Total Funds Available for Construction $6,357,744.96
FISCAL IMPACT: Rout i ne City ma i ntenance upon comp 1 et i on of the roadway and
drainage facilities.
WPC 5651 E
Iq-~
!H.MQRAti!!!lM
TO:
John Goss, City Manager
Bruce Boogaard, City Attorney
Lyman Christopher, Director of Finance
Beverly Authelet, City Clerk
Roberto Saucedo, Senior Civil Engineer
DATE: June 13, 1991
Fil e AN-012
FROM: John lippitt, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: Reso 1 ut ion - Accept i ng bids and awardi ng contract for "Wi deni ng of
Telegraph Canyon Road/Otay lakes Road from Apache Drive to Rutgers
Avenue and Channel Improvements" in the City of Chula Vista, CA
Funds Reouired for Construction
a. Contract Amount
b. Water Facilities (meters)
c. Staff Expenses (10%)
d. Contingencies (approx. 5%)
Total Funds for Construction
$4,697,582.00
155,000.00
469,758.20
234.879.80
$5,557,220.00
Funds Available for Construction
a. Funds in Escrow Account with Otay Water District
b. FAU Funds - Account #251-2510-ST131B
c. Defense Access Funds - Account #252-2520-ST1318
d. Otay lakes Road - Rutgers to Apache (DIF account
for construction) - Account #621-6210-5523-ST131B
e. Otay lakes Road - Rutgers to Apache (DIF account
for contingencies) - Account #621-6210-5399-ST131B
Total Funds Available for Construction
$ 761,269.00
1,455,476.00
1,431,000.00
1,855,200.00
854,800.00
$6,357,744.96
WPC 5652E
Ilf-3
\'i~~l~~'tHECITY OF (:HUL-1'VI5i:.tPARrY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT'
;~., . : ~ "; " _,' ,c.",~. J ," ", _"
'.. Stnteme~t of disclosure of certain ownership interests, payments, or campaign contribution~; orl
which will require discrc:tionary action on the part of the City Council, Planning Commission, a
{1~.'!l:~.~~T~:fu::~o~:i~~Iin~::::t~o:!!s;.:e:':i~:~:i:~: interest t.2. " ..;; -'f.
subcontrnctor1 material supplier,
.Ef(~B'ChS INC-
,
Xl 'J:~
:'i':;':':'4t:t)":;',:':l~,_:';' " - . ", . ;.', '-,~.;\ '. ' '!.~i
~~'il"!!-;~"'" ,... . '.. .. .' . .... .. .,.
";~!ilJ~'1 '~ny:;p' e'~s~h; iJe~tifiecf p~rsua~; to (1) abot 1sa corpor~lion o:t~it~~J~~:j\i&the n
- " I
individunls owning more than 10% of the sha;~s in. th~ corporation or owning any p
'. interest in the partnership. .:"i; , ..'
,
/!!If!I<.I.ii04.s luG. - C / {'Vf t-H Iii7U5 04
S'ece>n- 67tA800'l O!.JhetJoAofIV' ~/4""6\K-
,
", ",1
:;'I;i:'k>/~"i',~:" ,,\: ,_", ..' .',
.~~;~~...dt'c''ii..'F''.'''''''i;I.:: ,-'.1".;.., .... . .! ...; .'';i:!~..\. .....:t'.
~}.'J:;.Z-:tt:'" . .,;' . -'i'i'" . ....' ..... -.' . ".~., 1" ;," ~ ::'. . "f-";-~d,
3." If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is non-profit organization or a trust, list' _,
of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or ,as trustee.' or bell '
, \lstor of t~e trllst.}! f,j ,,;;,1,, '
i, :~ i\;H~Alt:;~ " . -,-Ij . J
t:'l:.X.'~" '.:.~" ,,'f' ir""':':!:.
~" '.. ~ :: ~. ',~' ~:;,
.
...~...:.....
,',..', :',.
. " , ~ .... . ,~'. ,.. t,. "::"":9tl't,::t".{ctH>!1ii!.*Ir'ri( ,
ave you and/or' your officers or agents, in the aggregate, contributed'I~.e 'than'.'.~l.,
Councilmember in the current or preceding election period? Yes _ No' ,If yes,: st'
;,0 'ouncilmember(s):" '. -".""
. ' :::-;~J:1+~
';{ " t. "i ,': . {..t:~i' :;, 'i',; "" ," ."~'l!iJ' ~', > ,1
:,;_ ~.t;("/'~' ': ,- . : ~ -,.., . ~'t'Y,rrltL~ :, ~;'~K:I~'\f'f',~- '. :;~ ,'",
,". .~ lS'dcnncd as: "AII.vindi,'idllnl,jirm, co.p(/rl1l~,.sltip,joilll "~III/I"~. (lSsoc/mioll. SOCi(//~/lIh,f"(I/~fllnlorg(llliznliolj':f
,':#(1/(', II'lISr, r~ceircr, s)'1ldicme, ,IIis and aIJ)' o,her COlllll)'. cif)' mid COltlln)', city, II/wlicipnlif)', district or olllcrpo!iric(l/ SII
(ll' 1111,\" orlu!r group or combillnrion f1Cfillg (IS n IIIlit,. \. '. ' _,(I /}'1','
r,'l.j',.}
'_,:~ ~,~~f ~~' n ~{;~i
inAic: .~l\"
(:\OTE::AI13Ch ,,~dilion~1 p:lgCS 3S ncccSs3l')')
'o:l\d"f (,-/;1- tl
,< ....'t?
~d;;iA~; .<,
~~;.H~",.,::\
,-';
lSCLOSt::.TX11
'1>";- ;;;':;:1!1:n'c1:H:
)4ft:
~
RESOLUTION NO.J~ ~.t
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR "WIDENING OF
TELEGRAPH CANYON ROAD/GrAY LAKES ROAD FROM APACHE DRIVE ro
RUTGERS AVENUE AND CHANNEL IMPROVEMENTS" IN THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA
follows:
The City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby resolve as
WHEREAS, the following five bids were received and opened at 2:00
p.m. on the 12th day of June, 1991, in Conference Rooms 2 and 3 in the Public
Services Building of the City of Chula Vista for widening of Telegraph Canyon
Road/Otay Lakes Road from Apache Drive to Rutgers Avenue and channel
improvements:
Contractor Base Bid #l Base Bid #2 Deductive ' Gr and TOtal
Erreca's Inc. - $4,095,609.00 $661,973.00 $ 60,000.00 $4,697,582.00
Spring valley
Southland paving, $4,109,057.73 0 0 $4,109,057.73
Inc., - Escondido
Cass Construction $4,221,008.54 $778,863.25 $ 19,300.00 $4,980,571.79
Inc., - El Cajon
Commercial $4,392,697.25 $697,994.00 0 $5,090,691.25
Contractors, Inc. -
Drainage Construction $5,229,139.42 $999,449.80 $155,000.00 $6,073,589.22
Co., Inc. -
WHEREAS, the contract included two base bids, Base Bid #l included
all of the work required to be done by the City of Chula vista as part of
constructing Telegraph Canyon Road and Otay Lakes Road and Base Bid #2
included work desired to be accomplished by Otay Water District; and
WHEREAS, the City also included a deductive item in the bid for
lowering the combined cost of Base Bid #1 and #2 if the contractor was awarded
both bids; and
WHEREAS, the low bidder for both Base Bid #l and Base Bid #2 was
Erreca's Inc. with a combined low bid of $4,697,582, which is below the
Engineer's estimate of $6,402,697.15 by $1,705,115.15 or 26.6%; and
WHEREAS, Engineering staff has reviewed the low bid and finds it to
be excellent and recommend awarding e contract to Erreca' s Inc., who has
assured the City that they are a licensed contractor in the State of
California and can produce an acceptable performance bond.
/41 V -~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Chula vista has reviewed the design and bid specifications for the
construction of said project and does hereby approve same.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista does hereby accept said five bids, and does hereby award the contract
for said widening of Telegraph Canyon Road/Otay Lakes Road to Erreca's Inc. in
the amount of $4,697,582 to be completed in accordance with the specifications
as approved by the Director of Public Works of the City of Chula Vista.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of Chula vista be,
and he is hereby authorized and directed to execute said contract for and on
behalf of the City of Chula Vista.
Presented by
as to
~
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
8971a
Attorney
-2- )"1 -/::;
-#F!
M [ M Q B 8 ~ ~ G ~
TO:
John Goss, City Manager
Bruce Boogaard, (;\y Attorney
0'man Christopher, Director of fin;rnce
\/,Beverly Authelet, City Clerk
Roberto Saucedo, Senior Civil Engineer
DATE: June 13, 1991
File AN-012
FROM: John Lippitt, Director of Public Work~
SUBJECT: Resolut ior. - Acr. rpt ing b'ds anO'Well :'ing contract for "Widening of
Telegrap~ (any'" FCJa'j/lJlay lake, qc'" from Apache Drive to Rutgers
Avenue and Channel Improvements" 1- I",; City of Chula Vista, CA
Funds Reauired for Construction
a,
b,
c,
d,
Contract Amount
Water Factl ities (meto,,)
Staff Expenses (10%)
Contingencies (approx 5%)
Total Funds for Construct ion
$4,697,582,00
155,000,00
469,758,20
234,879,80
$5,557,220,00
Funds Available for_CQilltr~ct, i90
a,
b,
c,
d,
Funds in Escrow Account with Otay Water
FAU Funds - Account #251-2510-ST131B
Defense Access Funds Account #252-252
Otay Lakes Road - Rutgers to Apache (Dr
for construction) Account #62].6210,
Otay Lakes Road RU'qp,s to Apacoe ( r
for contingenc1es) ,I" ount #62162]
Di strict
$ 761,269.00
1,455,476.00
],431,000.00
1,855,200.00
854,800.00
e,
-STl31B
ac' ount
23-',T]31B
31' oun t
l~. ST]3]B
Total Funds Available for Construction
$6,357,744.96
WPC 5652E
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
SUBMITTED BY:
Item----6-
Meeting Date ,61~8/91
Resol ut i on ,e, ~ II '> Affi rmi ng the Tri a 1 Traffi c Regul at i on
- Parking p'rohibition for vehicles over 6 feet in height on
East Flower Street
Director of Public WOrk~'(~
City Manager d'~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes___No~)
On October 25, 1990, a trial traffic regulation establishing a parking
prohibition for vehicles over 6 feet in height on East Flower Street was
implemented pursuant to the provisions of Section 10.12.030 of the Chula Vista
Municipal Code. Signs prohibiting parking for these vehicles were installed
on October 29, 1990.
ITEM TITLE:
REVIEWED BY:
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the resolution to make the
trial traffic regulation permanent.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: The Safety Commission, at their meeting
of May 9, 1991, voted 6-0 to recommend that the City Council make this trial
traffic regulation permanent.
DISCUSSION:
Pursuant to the provlslons of Section 10.12.030 of the Chula Vista Municipal
Code, adopted by Ordinance No. 1625 on May 27, 1975, the City Engineer on
October 25, 1990, determined that in the interest of minimizing traffic
hazards and congestion and for the promotion of public safety, a trial traffic
regulation be established:
The parking prohibition of vehicles which are six feet or more in height
(including any load thereon) on the west side of East Flower Street between
the first and second northerly driveways to the Eucalyptus Grove apartment
complex as per the Cal ifornia Vehicle Codes Section No. 22507 (see attached
map) .
Said regulations became effective upon the posting of the signs on October 29,
1990, and has run for a trial period of almost eight (8) months from the date
of such posting. A review of said installation needs to be made to determine
if the prohi bit i on shoul d be made permanent. Section 10.12.030 of the Chul a
Vista Municipal Code only allows a trial traffic regulation to exist for eight
months, at which time either a resolution affirming the trial traffic
regulation must be adopted or the trial traffic regulation ceases to be
effective.
15-1
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date 6/18/91
The purpose of this six-foot vehicle height parking restriction is to prevent
1 arge vehi cl es such as vans, trucks, and campers from parki ng in a manner
which may affect visibility of motorists exiting the Eucalyptus Grove
apartment complex northerly (second) driveway from seeing oncoming cross
traffic.
At the Safety Commi ss i on meet i ng of May 9, 1991, the Safety Commi ssi on voted
6-0 to concur with staff and recommend that the City Council adopt the
resolution to make the trial traffic regulation permanent.
A review of the traffic conditions by staff and the Pol ice Department show
that this trial traffic regulation is operating effectively. Therefore, staff
recommends that the trial traffic regulation be made permanent.
WPC 5602E
Attachment: Area Plat
Trial Traffic Regulation
Draft Safety Commission Minutes dated 5/9/91 (excerpt)
/1- J...
'-...~\ ""-4,.
.....;.-l,' "!"~ 10
....~o ""i\I..q
.;~..(\ ..... ~o(
"",,\ ..-....
So 1J'l'i 0..,-
'",
~~
\,.'~\.z
~Y...\
~"'.'~ <90s
'-\~
--:... ';.:
-~ \L
toO. .rf\ 5 ",",CQIII I
~~ \;11 VA. '!>(.c ,,0 to. '1.,'- tV
"'"~\'" / ~ ;26,0
'--\ ~..,.- -5.11 Q ("'t'"C 111
~"~!<<~~,P ~'-
,.,.,?Af'IO _v.\ f~"
AI' ,,1 ~ .. ." la" .... .......1-
.. .~ ".~.;...
.........~ ~.\..
..1:, ..:...:.~, .6' ~r=':'"
.... ....,......J
~ ". @)'
",~'L. ~. / .":.."9'C \..... .
1I1r-,h . ,11 ..> "". ~.I, -.. IJ!
,,, ~ .r"'p J " '. ('II,'
Q r~,,'~~ ~ \.. 7~: r"' ~..: .....,/'~.~
QY \ ,....,..~' )' ';'~~:~'"
SHT 2 t If) ,.'P. ~ ~.. :~.:J I ,,.., ,
. ~'} @"./ ' . " "
~r"DI-.t'l.".'o.a...c..,.. e\'. . '.
.... "' .t~. '. . .. Hwt'''/'' .
0511"<:'-- " of "" ""1 l~:"" Ill' .... j
.'7~"1 f_~ '~;"t'~:'1"''''I'-'.'Ji,t.~-t~j-;~'T....:',.~
RD. lI'. .~~';-[B~J:.:/l~.~~:L't'-7.- ~ :-~~::: ..-
RS1299: ,.._~ ._..._~~~~...,,.
(rI07) 1\,,~BONrTA GLIi:"J D~. -:- "
" .
~BONITA
" , r
' ,
AREA PLAT FOR EUCALYPTUS GROVE,
APARTMENT COMPLEX
@
13.21 AC
,
\)
,'0
0,
~
Q SEG 110 <I,
(......
~~
O'~
~"
~~
~
~~
11t~
-t/, e--9S~ O~
SD "1~
,~'<90 e-
.' S
!
II,
.'
"',
~
@
b'e,0-1'
Slot J a
Pr'f~
GJ
SHT I
~
"
@
1M I1ItGO [OIftHf ~
ASSUSOIB "~P l' 'Or
lOOk ~10PAC[ 02 . ~.
MAPPlO 'OR ASSUSMUtT 'UIt'OS~S ONl'f
. . ," '~l.'
Em
, .
SHT I,
110
/
TI TlE:
Date:
/1ID
/O/~3l?o
~
E;)
POR 10
~
9
CITY 2~/38
87._"c' 4'~
CHULA
....,.
4 ,- ~
"
.....
",
\',\r'
,'"
",
'. :..':.1'
"
ltiEQRMAIIQti IIEM
DATE:
TO:
VIA:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
October 25, 1990
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
John Goss, City Manager ....~
John Lippitt, Director of Public Work~ qrv
Establishing Trial Traffic Regulation
Pursuant to the provi s ions of Sect ion 10.12.030 of the Chul a Vi sta Muni c i pa 1
Code, adopted by Ordinance No. 1625 on May 27, 1975, the City Engineer has
determined that in the interest of minimizing traffic hazards and congestion
and for the promotion of public safety, there is hereby established:
The parking prohibition of vehicles which are six feet or more in height
(including any load thereon) on the west side of East Flower Street between
the first and second northerly driveways to the Eucalyptus Grove apartment
complex as per the California Vehicle Codes Section No. 22507 (see attached
map) .
Said regulations become effective upon the posting of the signs and shall run
for a trial period of eight (8) months from the date of such posting, at which
time a review of said installation will be made to determine if the
prohibition should be made permanent.
The purpose of this six-foot vehicle height parking restriction is to prevent
large vehicles such as vans, trucks, and campers from parking in a manner
which may affect visibility of motorists exiting the Eucalyptus Grove
apartment complex northerly (second) driveway from seeing oncoming cross
traffic.
WPC 5273E
l
1,- f /IS-b
IDe;
Safety Commi<<<<ion Meeting
May 9, 1991
Minutes
condition of some of the vehicles sold at the car auction, some of the vehicles are not
driveable. Owners of these vehicles attempt repairs anywhere they can, usually affecting
the reserved parking spaces for the Irongate Business Park. Several City departments
have tried to resolve the congestion which occurs on auction days. The Building and
Housing Department has sent Code Enforcement Officers to enforce City ordinances.
The Chula Vista Police Department has cited illegally parked cars.
Staff Recommendation: That City staff continue to monitor traffic conditions in the are
and city illegally parked vehicles.
Mike Vogt, 3648 Main Street #200, Chula VISta, CA 91911
Mr. Vogt is a business owner adjacent to the auto action. Mr. Vogt explained many of
the problems that occur on auction days. These include people parking vehicles in his
reserved spaces to repair cars. There is no provision by Mission City Auto Action for
refuge disposal or restroom facilities. There is much trash left on the lot and Mr. Vogt's
property is used by some people as a toilet. Mr. V ogt also stated that there is a great
concern with people parking on the south side of Main Street and running across the
street to the Auto Action.
Motion by Thomas to prepare a letter to the City Council requesting immediate action
to stop the auctions. Second by Matacia.
Motion by Thomas to notify Mission City Auto Action that they are in violation of
zoning ordinances. Second by Matacia. MSUC 6-0.
The Commission encouraged Mr. Vogt to attend a City Council Meeting and again stress
the urgency of this matter.
8. STATUS REPORT ON SHELL OIL COMPANY
Staff mentioned that a report will be going to the City Council later this month to
approve the street improvement project for Bonita Glen Drive.
9. TRIAL TRAFFIC REGULATION:
(a) Parking prohibited during certain hours on "J" Street and Corte Maria Avenue
Staff reported back on the signs posted prohibiting cars from parking on "J" Street and
Corte Maria Avenue during certain hours. Signs were posted on Thursday, November
1, 1990 and a review of the traffic conditions show that they are operating effectively.
Staff Recommendation: That the safety Commission recommend to City Council that the
Trial Traffic Regulation be made permanent.
-3-
I, --5
Safety Commi""ion Meeting
May 9, 1991
Minutes
(b) All-way stop at the intersection of Avenida YsidoralCalle Santiago/Rain Forest Road
Staff reported back on the all-way stop sign at the intersection of Avenida Ysidora/Calle
Santiago/Rain Forest Road. Signs were posted on Thursday, October 25, 1990 and a
review of the traffic conditions show that they are operating effectively. There have been
no reported accidents at this intersection since the all-way stop was installed.
Staff Recommendation: That the safety Commission recommend to City Council that the
Trial Traffic Regulation be made permanent.
(c) Parking prohibition for vehicles over 6 feet in height on East Flower Street
Staff reported back on the prohibition of parking for vehicles over 6 feet in height on
East Flower Street. The purpose of this six-foot vehicle height parking restriction was
to prevent large vehicles from parking in a manner which may affect visibility of
motorists exiting from the Eucalyptus Grove apartment complex from seeing oncoming
traffic. Signs were posted on Monday October 29, 1990 and a review of the traffic
conditions show that they are operating effectively.
Staff Recommendation: That the safety Commission recommend to City Council that the
Trial Traffic Regulation be made permanent.
Motion by Thomas to accept staff recommendations. Matacia second. MSUC 6-0.
10. STAFF INFORMATIONAL REPORT: C.I.P. STATUS REPORT FY90-91
Staff mentioned that the contractor has started work on the signal modifications for
Broadway and "I" Streets and the flashing red beacon for southbound Hilltop Drive at
E. Rienstra Street.
11. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS-
Tadeusz Pieknik, 72 F Street, Chula Vista, CA 91910
Mr. Pieknik is the owner of a property at 616 3rd Avenue, which is a Preschool/Day Care
Center. Mr. Pieknik informed the Commission that he did not receive any notice of the
intention of the Safety Commission or of this meeting. Mr. Pieknik stated that if the city
went ahead with plans to prohibit on street parking in the 600 block of Third Avenue, then
the patrons to his business would not have any place to park and walk their children into the
center. The location is equipped only with a small one-car driveway. He wanted to know
how the parents would drop off their children with no parking.
Staff informed the Commission that all businesses on Third A venue received notification of
these proceedings. The letters were addressed to "Occupant/Resident/Tenant." Mr. Pieknik
indicated that he was the owner of the property and rented to another party. The
Commission informed Mr. Pieknik that the matter has already been acted upon and it would
be up to him to go the City Council before any official action was taken.
-4-
I~-~
RESOLUT ION NO. -' f.t jo 3
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AFFIRMING THE TRIAL TRAFFIC
REGULATION - PARKING PROHIBITION FOR VEHICLES
OVER 6 FEET IN HEIGHT ON EAST FLOWER STREET
The City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, on October 25, 1990, a trial traffic regulation
establishing a parking prohibition for vehicles over 6 feet in
height on East Flower Street was implemented pursuant to the
provisions of Section 10.12.030 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code
and signs prohibiting parking for these vehicles were installed
on October 29, 1990; and
WHEREAS, the Safety Commission, at their meeting of May
9, 1991, voted 6-0 to recommend that the City Council make this
trial traffic regulation permanent.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the Ci ty of Chula Vista does hereby affirm the tr ial traffic
regulation establishing a parking prohibition for vehicles over 6
feet in height on East Flower Street, in such locations as may be
marked with signage by the Public Works Director.
Presented by
App05 ed
o form
/1\
rd, City Attorney
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
8935a
Bruce M.
(
){-7
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
ITEM TITlE:
Item J (p
Meeting Date 6/18/91
Resol ution /'~O 't Accepting bids and awarding contract
for tree trimming services for Fiscal Year 1990-91 in the City
of Chula Vista, californi.aa .. ~
Director of Public Works~
City Manage~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes___No-x-)
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
At 2:00 p.m. on May 22, 1991, in the Public Services Building, the Director of
Public Works received sealed bids for "Tree Trimming Services for Fiscal Year
1990-91 in the City of Chula Vista, California". Funds for this project were
budgeted in FY 1990-91. The work to be done consists of trimming broadleaf,
eucalyptus, cocus palm, and date palm trees located on various streets in the
City of Chula Vista, California.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council:
1. Accept bids and award contract to Tip Top Tree Service, Inc., in the
amount of $77,658.
2. Authorize Director of Publ ic Works to execute change order with Tip Top
Tree Service, Inc. to include an additional 1016 broadleaf trees which
require trimming.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
Bids were received from four contractors as follows:
Contractor
Bid Amount
1. Tip Top Tree Service, Inc., Lancaster, CA
2. Atlas Environmental, San Diego, CA
3. Westcoast Arborists, Buena Park, CA
4. Golden Bear Arborists, Inc., Monrovia, CA
$77,658.00
83,903.00
88,452.00
91,478.00
The low bid by Tip Top Tree Service, Inc. is below the engineer's estimate of
$118,130 by $40,472 or 34 percent. We have reviewed the low bid and recommend
awarding the contract to Tip Top Tree Service, Inc. Staff has contacted the
City of Lancaster, City of Palmdale and Southern California Edison, agencies
which have contracted with Tip Top Tree Service Inc. All say that the
contractor does a very good job and is easy to work with.
This project was budgeted for tree trimming services based upon a fixed amount
of budgeted funds in the Public Works Operations Special Contractual Services
Account. At the time the budget was approved by the City Council, specific
trees to be trimmed were not identified. A list of trees and their location
was prepared and staff bid the project on the basis of this list.
I' -)
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date 6/18/91
A number of years ago, the Public Works Department developed an inventory of
street trees and implemented a cyclical trimming schedule. The last two
years, the number of trees trimmed has not kept up with the planned trimming
cycle because of a lack of available funds. This bid, which was considerably
lower than the estimate, will allow us to add more trees to the contract so
that we more nearly keep with the planned trimming cycle.
Because of thi s excell ent bi d, staff is request i ng Council authori zat i on for
the Director of Publ ic Works to execute a change order with Tip Top Tree
Service, Inc., such that we utilize all the funds currently budgeted for tree
trimming. We plan to utilize available funds to trim an additional 1016
broadleaf trees.
Attached is a copy of the Contractor's Disclosure statement.
FINANCIAL STATEMENT:
Funds Reauired for Tree Trimmina
Contract Amount
Staff (design and inspection)
Contract Change Order, 1016 Broadleaf Trees
Total Funds for Tree Trimming
Funds Available in Soecial Contractual Services Account
Tree Trimming Citywide
$ 77,658.00
5,028.00
34.544.00
$117,230.00
$117,230.00
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
WPC 5628E
File: JY-059
), - J...
!H.MQRAtfU!!.M
DATE: May 28, 1991
TO: John Goss, City Manager
Bruce Boogaard, City Attorney
Lyman Christopher, Director of Finance
Beverly Authelet, City Clerk
Roberto Saucedo, Senior Civil Engineer
Harlan Wilson, Street Maintenance Superintendent
FROM: John Lippitt, Director of Public Works
SUBJECT: Resolution - Accepting bids and awarding contract for "tree
trimmi ng servi ces for Fi sca 1 Year 1990-91 in the City of Chula
Vista, Cal ifornia".
Funds Reauired for Tree Trimmina
Contract Amount
Staff (design and inspection)
Contingencies (contract change order, 1016 Broadleaf Trees)
Total Funds for Tree Trimming
$ 77,658.00
5,028.00
34.544.00
$117,230.00
Funds Available For Tree Trimmina Citv-wide
Account 100-1450-5203 - Special Contract ural Services
$117,230.00
WPC 5629E
Fil e: DY -059
), -3/1'-1-
THE CITY OF CHUIA VISTA PARTY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
l)t~ment of disclosure of certain ownership interests, payments, or campaign contributions, on all matters
,ilich will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council, Planning Commission, and all other
official bodies. The foIlowing information must be disclosed:
1. list the names of all persons having a financial interest in the contract, i.e., contractor,
subcontractor, material supplier.
Tip Top Tree Service, Inc.
2. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all
individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership
interest in the partnership.
James P. Lewandowski
3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is non-profit organization or a trust, list the names
of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or
trustor of the trust.
None
4. Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of the City staff,
Boards, Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months? Yes
No~ If yes, please indicate person(s):
5. Please identify each and every person, including any agents, employees, consultants or independent
contractors who you have assigned to represent you before the City in this matter.
Michael Jones
Raymond Lewandowski
6. Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggregate, contributed more than $1,000 to a
Councilmember in the current or preceding election period? Yes _ NoX~ If yes, state which
Councilmember( s):
Person Is defIned as: "Any individual,Jiml, co-pannersllip, joinl \'enrure, association, social club,fraternal organizalion, corporation,
estate, f1Ust, receiver, syndicate, tllis and any OIlier counly, cily and counny, cilY, municipality, district or otller political subdivision,
or any other group or combination acting as a unil."
(NOTE: Attach additional pages as necessary)
Date: 5/21/91
(A.113\A:DISCLOSE. TXT]
James P. Lewandowski
Print or type name of contractor/applicant
[Revised: I1l3Om]
,...~..-
~
RESOLUTION NO.~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING
CONTRACT FOR TREE TRIMMING SERVICES FOR FISCAL
YEAR 1990-91 IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA,
CALIFORNIA
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the following four
opened at 2:00 p.m. on the 22nd day of
Services Building of the Ci ty of Chula
services for Fiscal Year 1990-91:
bids were
May, 1991,
vista for
received and
in the Public
tree tr imming
Contractor
Bid Amount
1.
2.
3 .
4 .
Tip Top Tree Service, Inc., Lancaster, CA
Atlas Environmental, San Diego, CA
Westcoast Arborists, Buena Park, CA
Golden Bear Arborists, Inc., MonrOVia, CA
$77,658.00
83,903.00
88,452.00
91,478.00
and
WHEREAS, it has been recommended that said contract be
awarded to Tip Top Tree Service, Inc., who has assured the City
that he is a licensed contractor in the State of California and
can produce an acceptable performance bond.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula Vista does hereby accept said four bids, and
does hereby award the contract for said tree trimming to Tip TOp
Tree Service, Inc. in the amount of $77,658.00 to be completed in
accordance with the specifications as approved by the Director of
Public Works of the City of Chula Vista.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the Ci ty of
Chula Vista be, and he is hereby authorized and directed to
execute said contract for and on behalf of the City of Chula
Vis ta .
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Director of Public
is authorized to execute a change order with Tip Top
Service, Inc. to include an additional 1016 broadleaf
require trimming.
Works
Tree
which
Presented by
fO~
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
8960a
Bruce M. Boog ar , City Attorney
1~-5
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
ITEM TITLE:
Item-!'l-
Meeting Date 6/18/91
Resolution \l.~~ Accepting bids and awarding contract
for parking rot addition, Otay Community Center, 1571 Albany
Avenue in the City of Chula V~j~ California
Director of Public WorkS~~
Director of Community De~opment
City Managert~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No_>
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
At 2:00 p.m. on May 22, 1991 in the Public Services Building, the Director of
Public Works received sealed bids for parking lot addition, Otay Community
Center, 1571 Albany Avenue in the City of Chula Vista, California. Funds for
this project were budgeted in FY 1988-89.
The project involves removal and disposal of existing improvements, excavation
and grading, asphalt concrete paving, processed miscellaneous base, installing
curb and gutter, P.C.C. swale, sidewalk, landscaping and automatic irrigation
system and other miscellaneous work shown on the plans.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council accept bids and award contract to Frank & Son
Paving, Inc. in the amount of $25,086.52.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
MAAC Project recei ved and ut il i zed fundi ng from the Cali forni a Department of
Aging to expand the existing building at the Otay Community Center. In order
to maintain the appropriate parking allowance, the City has required the
construction of 12 additional parking spaces.
MAAC project failed to build the additional parking spaces in a timely manner,
so the City took over responsibil ity for the design and construction. The
parking lot will be built on property owned by the Chula Vista Elementary
school district. When it is completed, the project will be formally accepted
by the School District and at that time an agreement will be signed by the
School district which will hold the City harmless in the event of legal
claims. The School District will be responsible for maintenance of the
parking lot and landscaping.
Bids were received from contractors as follows:
1. Frank and Son Paving, Inc., Chula Vista
2. 0 & B Matthews Construction, Inc. San Diego
3. Caves Construction, San Diego
4. Southland Paving, Inc., Escondido
5. Sim J. Harris, San Diego
6. MAAC Project, National City
$25,086.52
25,816.00
27,041. 00
27,998.00
30,481. 00
45,599.37
17- (
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date 6/18/91
The low bid by Frank and Son Paving is below the engineer's estimate of
$27,285.70 by $2,199.18 or eight percent (8%). We have reviewed the low bid
and recommend awarding the contract to Frank and Son Paving. Attached is a
copy of the contractor's disclosure statement.
FINANCIAL STATEMENT:
TOTAL FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION
$25,086.52
3,762.98
5.568.40
$34,417.90
Funds required for construction contract
Contingency (approximately 15 percent)
Staff cost (approximately 22 percent)
Funds available for construction
A. Community Development Block Grant
FY 88-89 - 641-6410-PRI44
B. Community Development Block Grant
FY 89-90 - 644-6440-PRI44
C. Urban County CDBG Funds
643-6430-PRI44
TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION
$11,105.57
6,215.33
17 ,097 .00
$34,417.90
FISCAL IMPACT: COBG funds in the amount of $34,417.90 are available for
construct i on of the parki ng lot. The County funds of $17,097 wi 11 be spent
first.
WPC 5635E
17-~ )\~":3
5.
THE C/1Y OF CHUU VISTA PAR1Y DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Statement of disclosure of certain ownership interests, payments, or campaign contributions, on all matters
which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council, Planning Commission, and all other
official bodies. The following information must be disclosed:
1.
List the names of all persons having
subcontractor, materi.l!.! supplier.
.3ra.Yl K 4 ~.pad1a:::zfi<t.,
:::L11 d l/.:;In ttt../ A~ <;p ,,-6.
a financial interest in the contract, i.e., contractor,
/J!?ibC Ltl11.ds~.
2.
If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all
individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership
interest in the partnership.
Ira.si:sf'V ,4.. Vtl.i'>'fLo(~()
:lr~ K '\. l~a5q~
\(l.IA- -r. 1/ oSq
3.
If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is non-profit organization or a trust, list the names
of any person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or
trustor of the trust.
NJA-
4.
Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of the City staff,
BO~~, Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months? Yes_
No If yes, please indicate person(s):
Please identity each and every person, including any agents, employees, consultants or independent
contractors who you have. assigned to represent you before the City in this matter.
,N/~
6. Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggregate, contributed more than $1,000 to a
Councilmember in the current or preceding election period'? Yes _ No ~ If yes, state which
Councilmember(s):
Person is defined as: "Any indil'idllal. firm, co-partnersllip, jolm w:11fure, association, social club, fraternal organizll/ion, corporation,
(,Slate, mist, receiver, :'J'fldicotl'. tlli.'i and any olher cOllllly, city and COltlltl)'. cit)', municipality, district or other polilical subdil'isiol1,
vr mry orlier group or combination acting as a wIil."
Date:
(NOTE: Allach additional pagcs as necessary)
-7
/
-5 -22 -4/
nt
rrAAJK !VA.SQ1JeZ-
Print or type name of conh'dctor/applicant
Illovi,od: 1I130fJOI
1,\~1 U\ADISCLOSLTXTJ
17-3
!HMQRAff!!!lM
DATE: June 5, 1991
File: JO-050
TO: John Goss, City Manager
Bruce Boogaard, City Attorney
Lyman Christopher, Director of Finance
Beverly Authelet, City Clerk
Roberto Saucedo, Senior Civil Engineer
FROM: John Lippitt, Director of Public Works
Christopher Salomone, Director of
Community Development
SUBJECT: Reso 1 ut ion - Accept i ng bi ds and awardi ng contract for parki ng lot
addition, Otay Community Center in the City of Chula Vista,
Cal iforni a
Funds Required for Construction
Construction Contract
Contingency - approximately 15 percent
Staff Cost - approximately 22 percent
$25,086.52
3,762.98
5.568.40
$34,417.90
TOTAL FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION
Funds Available for Construction
A. Community Development Block Grant
64I-64IO-PR144
B. Community Development Block Grant
644-6440-PR144
C. Urban County CDBG Funds
643-6430-PR144
TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION
$11,105.57
6,215.33
17.097.00
$34,417.90
WPC 5636E
1/- r-
RESOLUTION NO..J ";Zl)~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING
CONTRACT FOR PARKING LOT ADDITION, OTAY
COMMUNITY CENTER, 1571 ALBANY AVENUE IN THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the following six bids were received and opened
at 2:00 p.m. on the 22nd day of May, 1991, in the Public Services
Building of the City of Chula Vista for parking lot addition,
Otay Communi ty Center, 1571 Albany Avenue in the Ci ty of Chula
Vista:
1.
2 .
3 .
4 .
5 .
6 .
Frank and Son paving, Inc., Chula vista
o & B Matthews Construction, Inc. San Diego
Caves Construction, San Diego
Southland Paving, Inc., Escondido
Sim J. Harris, San Diego
MAAC Project, National City
$25,086.52
25,816.00
27,041.00
27,998.00
30,481.00
45,599.37
,
and
WHEREAS, it has been recommended that said contract be
awarded to Frank and Son Paving, Inc. who has assured the City
that he is a licensed contractor in the State of California and
can produce an acceptable performance bond.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula vista has reviewed the specifications for the
construction of said project and does hereby approve same.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City
of Chula Vista does hereby accept said six bids, and does hereby
award the contract for said parking lot addition to Frank and
Son paving, Inc. in the amount of $25,086.52 to be completed in
accordance with the specifications as approved by the Director of
Public Works of the City of Chula Vista.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of
Chula Vista be, and he is hereby authorized and directed to
execute said contract for and on behalf of the City of Chula
Vista.
Presented by
ved a9/ 0 form by
I
~ I
It Bruce M.
y Attorney
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
8956a
/7-5
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item~
Meeting Date 6/18/91
Resolution \~ ordering the summary vacation of sewer easement in
Weatherstone South, Units No.2 & 3
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public wor~ ~
REVIEWED BY: City Manager9~ 4/5 Vote: Yes_NoX
When Weatherstone South, Units No.2 and 3, subdivisions were developed in 1965, the sewer
main in the area was replaced by a main in Willowcrest Drive right-of-way (see Exhibit UAU).
Once the work was complete, the old easement containing the abandoned sewer main was never
vacated. The City is now initiating that vacation.
ITEM TITLE:
RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the subject resolution and direct the City Clerk
to forward it to the County for recordation.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
In 1961, when Halecrest Elementary School was built, in order to serve it with sewer, a main
was extended from Floyd Avenue to the school site (see Exhibit UAU). The alignment of the
sewer followed a path that was to be a future, dedicated street (Millan Street). After the main
was constructed, the intended street pattern was changed. The proposed Millan Street alignment
was scrapped and Willowcrest Drive and Berland Way were created by Weatherstone South,
Units 2 and 3.
The sewer main for those new subdivisions was built within the Willowcrest Drive right-of-way
and the old sewer was abandoned. The vacation of the easement for the abandoned main was
overlooked and still shows on the title reports for the properties on which it is located. One of
the affected property owners brought this to staffs attention recently.
Since this is a summary vacation, there is no associated public hearing required. However,
letters were sent by this department to all affected property owners requesting any
comments/objections they may have. There were no responses to our letter
There are no other utilities in the easement, so no easement reservations are necessary.
Section 8333 (c) of the Streets and Highways Code states that the Council may vacate a public
utility easement if the easement has been superseded by the relocation of the facilities and there
are no other public facilities in the easement.
1'8-1
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date 6/18/91
The following properties are affected:
Address
A.P.N.
447 Berland Way
639-620-05-00
446 Willowcrest Drive
639-600-01-00
448 Willowcrest Drive
639-600-02-00
450 Willowcrest Drive
639-600-03-00
452 Willowcrest Drive
639-600-04-00
In accordance with Subsection 8335 of the California Streets and Highways Code, the resolution
ordering the summary vacation must state all of the following:
1. That the vacation is made under Chapter 4 of the Streets and Highways Code;
2. The name or other designation of the easement and a precise description of the
portion vacated. (See Exhibit "B", attached.)
3. The facts under which the summary vacation is made.
4. That from and after the date the resolution is recorded, the easement vacated no
longer constitutes an easement.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
JWH/PV -04 7. A 13
1<(' ~
RESOLUTION NO.~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ORDERING THE SUMMARY VACATION OF
SEWER EASEMENT IN WEATHERSTONE SOUTH, UNITS
NO. 2 AND 3
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, when Weatherstone South Units No.
Subdivision was developed in 1965, the sewer main in the
replaced by a main in Willowcrest Drive right-of-way; and
2 and 3
area was
WHEREAS, once the work was complete, the old easemen t
containing the abandoned sewer main was never vacated and the
City is now initiating that vacation; and
WHEREAS, Section 8333(c) of the Streets and Highways
Code states that the Council may vacate a public utility easement
if the easement has been superseded by the relocation of the
facilities and there are no other public facilities in the
easement.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula Vista, under its authority pursuant to Chapter
4 of Part 3 of the California Streets and Highways Code and
specifically Section 8333, does hereby order the summary vacation
of a sewer easement in weathers tone south, Units No. 2 and 3,
more precisely described in Exhibits A and B, attached hereto and
incorporated herein by reference as if set forth in full.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that
directed to record this resolution and
its recordation, the sewer easement
public service easement.
the City Clerk is hereby
from and after the date of
no longer constitutes a
Presented by
form by
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
8965a
Bruce M. Boogaar , City Attorney
I<t" -,3
...
...
'"
...
I:\(
. ....
. 't
~
-~ ~
~!\I
<;:\~
~ '<\.
~~
~\.r
~)\
.,).
FILE NO.
DATE: 6 -6 -91 ..
J/4c.4 noN' OF SEWEZ
EAS6M€^-,T IN' !</EATJ./EIZSTO!./!; EXHIBIT "A"
SOUTH NITS
DWN BY:
)<d' - ~
EXHIBIT "B"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION FOR
SEWER EASEMENT VACATION IN
WEA THERSTONE SOUTH, UNITS 2 & 3
In the City of Chula Vista, those portions of a ten-foot-wide sewer easement granted to the City
of Chula Vista by deed recorded in the office of the Recorder of San Diego County, State of
California, on June 26,1961, File No. 108872, Series 2, Book 1961 of Official Records, said
portions lying within Lot No. 81 of Weatherstone South, Unit No.3, Subdivision according to
Map thereof No. 5629, recorded in the office of said County Recorder on September 30, 1965,
and Lots Numbered 47, 48, 49 and 50 of Weatherstone South, Unit No.2, Subdivision
according to Map thereof No. 5560, reorded in the office of said County Recorder on May 16,
1965.
l~-.5
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item----11-
Meeting Date 6/18/91
ITEM TITLE: Resolution 1(,~o7 Accepting bids and awarding contract
for asphaltic concrete
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Finance~
REVIEWED BY: City Manager 8~t (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No....!..J
Bids were received and opened at 11:00 a.m. on June 7, 1991 in the Office of
the Purchasing Agent for furnishing asphaltic concrete to the City for use
during the period July 1, 1991 through December 31, 1991. Bids were requested
for a six-month period due to fluctuating material costs.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council accept the bids and award the contract to
Industrial Asphalt.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
Bids were requested for the following:
ITEM
1
2
3
MATERIAL
ESTIMATED
USAGE
Type III-F-AR-4000 asphaltic concrete (sheet asphalt)
Type III-D-AR-4000 asphaltic concrete (3/8" max. aggregate)
Type III-D-SC-800 asphaltic concrete (cold mix)
1,580 Tons
3,000 Tons
420 Tons
Four vendors were mailed bid proposal forms with the following bids received:
PRICE PER TON
BIDDER ITEM 1 ITEM 2 ITEM 3
Industrial Asphalt,
San Diego 25.00 20.00 22.50
Sim J. Harris Co.,
San Diego 24.85 20.25 25.00
lakeside Asphalt,
lakeside 24.15 21. 49 22.00
Calif. Commercial Asphalt,
San Diego 26.50 22.00 22.50
TOTAL BID BASED
ON EST. USAGE
$108,950.
110,513.
111,867.
118,580.
The bid specifications called for pick up of the material at the vendor's
plant. This way, the job site could be prepared while trucks were on route to
pick up hot material and application made on their return.
1ft -I
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date 6/18/91
The bid of Industrial Asphalt meets specifications and is acceptable to the
Director of Public Works. The FY 90-91 unit prices were as follows:
ITEM 1
26.80
ITEM 2
22.40
ITEM 3
25.65
FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are provided for in the Gas Tax Fund.
WPC 0289U
11-~
RESOLUTION NO.~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ACCEPl'ING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR ASPHALTIC
CONCRETE
The City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby resolve as
follows:
WHEREAS, bids were received and opened at 11:00 a.m. on the 7th day of
June, 1991, in the Office of the purchasing Agent of the City of Chula vista
for furnishing asphaltic concrete to the City for use during the period July
1, 1991 through December 31, 1991 as follows:
ITEM
MATERIAL
ESTIMATED
USAGE
1
2
3
Type
Type
Type
III-F-AR-4000
III-D-AR-4000
III-D-SC-800
asphaltic concrete
asphaltic concrete
asphaltic concrete
(sheet asphalt)
(3/8" max. aggregate)
(cold mix)
1,580
3,000
420
Tons
Tons
Tons
WHEREAS, the following four bids were received:
PRICE PER TON TOTAL BID BASED
BIDDER ITEM 1 ITEM 2 ITEM 3 ON EST. USAGE
Industrial Asphalt,
San Diego 25.00 20.00 25.50 $108,950.
Sim J. Harr is Co.,
San Diego 24.85 20.25 25.00 110,513.
Lakeside Asphalt,
Lakeside 24.15 21.49 22.00 111,867.
Calif. Commercial Asphalt,
San Diego 26.50 22.00 22.50 118,580.
WHEREAS, the bid specifications called for pick up of the material at
the vendor's plant so that the job site could be prepared while trucks were on
route to pick up hot material and application made on their return; and
WHEREAS, it has been recommended that said contract be awarded to the
low bidder, Industrial Asphalt, who has assured the City that he is a licensed
contractor in the State of California and can produce an acceptable
performance bond.
row, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Chula vista does hereby accept said four bids, and does hereby award the
contract for said asphaltic concrete to Industrial Asphalt to be completed in
accordance with the specifications as approved by the Director of Public Works
of the City of Chula Vista.
If-.3
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Purchasing Agent of the City of Chula
Vista be, and he is hereby authorized and directed to execute said contract
for and on behalf of the City of Chula vista.
Presented by
Lyman Christopher, Director of
Finance
8966a
l'l-f
as to
Boogaard,
~
bYJ
y Attorney
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item ell>
Meeting Date 6/18/91
ITEM TITlE: Resolution lu:lD~ Accepting bids and awarding contract
for asphaltic emulsions
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Finance~;0
REVIEWED BY: City Manager~~ {4/Sths Vote: Yes_No..!....>
Bids were received and opened at 10:00 a.m. on June 7, 1991, in the Office of
the Purchasing Agent for furnishing RS-2 asphaltic emulsions with latex to the
City for the period July 1, 1991 through September 30, 1991. The emulsion is
required to be delivered to the work site and spread by the vendor.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council accept the bids and award the contract to Sim
J. Harris Company.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
Three vendors were mailed bid proposal forms. The following bids were
received:
BIDDER
PRICE
PER TON
$174.00
$196.81
ADDITIONAL
CHARGE PER TON
FOR SHORT LOADS
-0-
$40.00
COST PER HOUR IF
SPREAD TIME OVER 6 HRS
$80.00
$80.00
Sim J. Harris Co.
San Diego
Western Emulsion
Escondido
The material will be used for the street chip seal ing program which will be
completed by the end of September. The estimated usage is 300 tons with a
total cost of $55,854 including sales tax.
The bid of Sim J. Harris Company is low, meets specifications and it is the
recommendation of the Director of Public Works that the contract be awarded to
this company.
FY 90-91 unit price was $150.05 per ton, $25 per ton for short load and $75
hourly spread time over 6 hours.
FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are provided for in the Gas Tax Fund.
JE:fp
WPC 0243U
cQo-1
RESOLUTION NO. I(,~o~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING
CONTRACT FOR ASPHALTIC EMULSIONS
The City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the following two bids were received and opened
at 10:00 a.m. on the 7th day of June, 1991, in the Office of the
purchasing Agent of the City of Chula vista for furnishing
approximately 300 tons of RS-2 asphaltic emulsions with latex to
the City for the period July 1 through September 30, 1991:
BIDDER
PRICE
PER TON
ADDITIONAL
CHARGE PER TON
FOR SHORT LOADS
COST PER HOUR IF
SPREAD TIME OVER 6 HRS
Sim J. Harris Co.
San Diego
Western Emulsion
Escondido
$174.00
$196.81
-0-
$80.00
$80.00
$40.00
WHEREAS, it has been recommended that said contract be
awarded to Sim J. Harris Co. who has assured the City that he is
a licensed vendor in the State of California and can produce an
acceptable performance bond.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula Vista does hereby accept said two bids, and
does hereby award the contract for said asphaltic emulsions to
Sim J. Harris Co. to be completed in accordance with the
specifications as approved by the Director of Public Works of the
City of Chula vista.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the purchasing Agent of the
City of Chula vista be, and he is hereby authorized and directed
to execute said contract for and on behalf of the City of Chula
Vista.
Lyman Chr1stopher, Director of
Finance
8958a
Presented by
, C1t Attorney
r)O"':(
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
ITEM TITLE:
Item---e2.L-
Meeting Date 6/18/91
bids and awarding contract
Resolution \\1').01 Accepting
for screening (stone chips)
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Finance ;!~
REVIEWED BY: City Manager ~bfP<
Bids were received and opened at 3:00 p.m. on
the Purchasi ng Agent for furni shi ng screeni ngs
the period July 1 through December 31, 1991.
(4/5ths Vote: Yes__No-X-)
June 7, 1991 in the Office of
(stone chips) to the City for
REClM4ENDATION: That Council accept the bids and award the contract to Sim
J. Harris Company.
BOARDS/ClM4ISSIONS REClM4ENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
Four vendors were mailed bid proposal forms with two submitting the following
bids:
BIDDER
PRICE PER TON
$17.75
$20.25
TOTAL BID BASED
ON EST. USAGE
$71,000
$Bl,OOO
Sim J. Harris Co., San Diego
David Martin Supplies, Lakeside
The bid of Sim J. Harris Company meets specifications and it is the
recommendation of the director of Public Works that the contract be awarded to
thi s company. The estimated usage is 4,000 tons and deli very wi 11 be to the
City Yard. The FY 90-91 price per ton was $16.95.
FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are provided for in the Gas Tax Fund.
WPC 0288U
~/-I
RESOLUTION NO.~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING
CONTRACT FOR SCREENINGS (STONE CHIPS)
The City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the following two bids were received and opened
at 3:00 p.m. on the 7th day of June, 1991, in the Office of the
purchasing Agent of the City of Chula Vista for furnishing
screenings (stone chips) to the City for the period July 1
through December 31, 1991 with an estimated usage of 4,000 tons
delivered to the City yard:
BIDDER
PRICE PER TON
TOTAL BID BASED
ON EST. USAGE
Sim J. Harris Co., San Diego
David Martin supplies, Lakeside
$17.75
$20.25
$71,000
$81,000
WHEREAS, it has been recommended that said contract be
awarded to sim J. Harris Co. who has assured the City that he is
a licensed vendor in the State of California and can produce an
acceptable performance bond.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula Vista does hereby accept said two bids, and
does hereby award the contract for said screenings (stone chips)
to Sim J. Harr is Co. to be completed in accordance with the
specifications as approved by the Director of Public Works of the
City of Chula Vista.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the purchasing Agent of the
City of Chula Vista be, and he is hereby authorized and directed
to execute said contract for and on behalf of the City of Chula
Vista.
Lyman Christopher, Director of
Finance
8957a
AP1jved as t
f~ '""
(
Attorney
Presented by
form by
J./- ~
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
ITEM TITLE:
Item~
Meeting Date 6/18/91
Resolution J(,~'O Approving Contract for Services of
Contract Pllnner for Ea~:~ Projects and Waiving Bidding Procedure
Director of Planning ~
1
City Managery\ (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No_!.J
</
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
The Eastlake Development Company will be filing two applications for projects
involving the EastLake Village Center and Eastlake Greens. The first project
i nvol ves proposed changes to the Eastlake I Pl an to accommodate a Kaiser
Permanente hospital complex. A related project involves a community shopping
center on the south side of Otay Lakes Road. The second application is within
the EastLake Greens development and involves a supplemental density request
for 152 dwelling units on four parcels.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the attached resolution approving a
contract with Bud Gray and Associates to perform contract planning services on
the EastLake Vi 11 age Center and EastLake Greens projects, and authori ze the
Mayor to execute the contract on behalf of the City Council.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
The first application which will be filed by Eastlake Development Company
involves an amendment to the EastLake I Village Center Plan (located north of
Otay Lakes Road, east of EastLake Parkway) that seeks approval of the proposed
Kaiser Permanente Hospital project. This proposed change will necessitate
evaluating the various commercial, residential, open space and office land use
changes plus assessing the environmental impacts, fiscal impacts as well as
traffi c patterns, volumes, access poi nts, and the archi tectura 1 el ements of
the proposed project. The Kaiser project contains three phases with a seven
story medical office building, two six story hospital buildings plus parking
structures for 5,500 cars. Since the Village Center is in the center of the
overall EastLake Plan, these land use changes will need to be analyzed from an
environmental, transportation, fiscal, architectural and land use
perspective. A Sectional Planning Area plan amendment, Conditional Use
Permit, Precise Plan and Supplemental EIR will need to be processed by the
City. Staff will also review the General Development Plan and the Eastlake I
Public Facilities Financing Plan for compliance with the Growth Management
Program.
A related project in this same area involves a community shopping center
proposed south of Otay lakes Road (within EastLake Greens) which 1S
functionally related to the EastLake I Village center project in terms of
pedestrian and auto accessibil ity as well as scenic highway treatment along
Otay Lakes Road. This site is proposed to contain a total of 152,000 square
feet of floor area with a grocery store and related neighborhood shopping such
as drugstore, cleaners, etc. The precise plan for this site, although less
compl i cated, is closely related to the Eastlake I Vi 11 age Center with access
~
~~-l
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date 6/18/91
(pedestrian and auto) and design issues to be addressed. The project is
subject to Design Review Committee (DRC) approval of the architecture and site
planning for the center. It is anticipated that this project will be able to
move forward to ORC as soon as the traffic and scenic highway studies are
completed.
The second application filed by the EastLake Development Company involves
considerat i on of the suppl emental density request for four parcel s withi n
EastLake Greens (152 extra units). In July 1989, Council approved the
EastLake Greens SPA plan for 2,774 dwelling units. An interim zoning
designation of 4.5 dwelling units per acre was placed on five parcels within
the Greens project. Condit ion No. 77 on the EastLake Greens Tentat i ve Map
documented the interim zoning designation and indicated the SPA Plan and
Tentat i ve Map woul d be returned to the Pl anni ng Commi ss i on and Ci ty Council
for further consideration after the General Plan Committee concluded its
revi ew of the Land Use El ement pol i ci es. These pol i ci es recommended by the
General Plan Committee have been adopted as part of the General Plan Land Use
El ement. The EastLake Golf Course Use Agreement, dated January 22, 1991,
indicated that the City would consider the EastLake Greens supplemental
density appl ication in the context of the approval of the publ ic use (10
years) of the golf course.
A future project related to the second appl ication involves a fifth parcel
(R-26, 13.3 acres) (located between future SR 125 and EastLake Parkway) within
EastLake Greens which was also designated at 4.5 dwelling units per acre with
the approval of the EastLake Greens SPA Plan in July, 1989. This parcel will
be re-planned in conjunction with the 160 acre parcel to the south which is
currently owned by the Baldwin Company. EastLake and Baldwin are in escrow to
swap these two parcel s of land. EastLake has requested deferri ng
reconsideration of Parcel R-26 until they prepare a more comprehensive land
use plan for both R-26 and the 160 acres to the south.
The work program for the two app 1 i cat ions fil ed by EastLake wi 11 be prepared
once more detailed information is available. At a minimum, the following
plans, studies, permits, etc. will need to be evaluated and/or processed:
Aoolication No.1
A. Kaiser Hospital/Village Center Plan
1. EastLake I GDP/SPA Plan Amendment/PFFP
2. EastLake Planned Community Regulations Amendment
3. Supplemental E.I.R./Traffic Study/Fiscal Review
4. EastLake I Village Center Precise Plan/Design Review
5. Tentative Subdivision Map/Parcel Map
B. Community Shopping Center
1. Community Shopping Center Precise Plan/Landscape Plan
2. Traffic Thresholds/Access/Pedestrian Access
3. CEQA Requirements
J'- -,
Page 3, Item
Meeting Date 6/18/91
Aoolication No. 2 - EastLake Greens Suoolemental Densitv Reouest
(Four Parcels):
1. EastLake II General Development Plan Amendment
2. EastLake Greens SPA Plan/PFFP Amendment
3. EastLake Greens Planned Community District Regulations
Amendment
4. CEQA Requirements
5. Design Review
The EastLake Development Company and Kai ser Permanente have i ndi cated thei r
desire to move forward as quickly as possible to obtain City Council
consideration of these proposals. Therefore, staff is proposing the use of a
contract pl anner to serve as project manager and to conduct the analysi sand
evaluation work related to the Planning Department's review as well as
coordinating other City department inputs to the planning process.
Staff is recommending that Bud Gray and Associates be retained to perform
contract planning services on this project. Mr. Gray has performed in this
capacity in the review of several other EastLake plans, including EastLake I,
EastLake Greens, and EastLake II I/Olympi c Trai ni ng Center. Gi ven Mr. Gray's
extensive knowledge and experience on this project, and the desirability of
initiating these reviews as soon as possible, staff recommends that
competitive bidding requirements on this contract be waived, pursuant to
Section 2.56.070 of the Municipal Code. The consultant would be compensated
on an hourly basis, in an amount not to exceed $60,000.
Staff would also plan to hire an environmental consulting firm to prepare the
environmental reports plus an architect to assist staff in evaluating the
design and site plan of the Kaiser Hospital project. A traffic analysis and
fiscal impact analysis would be included as part of the process.
FISCAL IMPACT: None. The appl icant will pay all City costs on a full cost
recovery bas is.
WPC 9408P
cR~-3
AGREEMENT WITH
BUD GRAY AND ASSOCIATES
FOR CONTRACT PlANNING SERVICES
WITH REGARD TO THE
EASTlAKE I VILLAGE CENTER
AND EASTLAKE GREENS PROJECTS
This Agreement is made this 18th day of June 1991, for the purposes
of reference only, and effective as of the date last executed between the
parties, between the City of Chula Vista ("City") herein, a municipal
corporation of the State of California, Bud Gray, an individual doing business
as Bud Gray and Associates, a professional planning consulting ("Consultant");
and the EastLake Development Company, ("Applicant"), a California limited
Partnership, (an applicant for various discretionary approvals in conjunction
with the EastLake I Village Center and EastLake Greens Projects) and is made
with reference to the following facts:
RECITALS
Whereas, the property whi ch is the subject of thi s Consultant's
analysis as required in this Agreement is a 91.4! acre parcel generally
located northerly of Otay Lakes Road, westerly of the upper Otay Reservoir,
withi n the EastLake I Vi 11 age Center and four parcel s contai ni ng 27.4 acres
located wi thi n the EastLake Greens project as shown on the map attached and
hereto as Exhibit A ("Subject Site"); and,
Whereas, Appl icant has made appl ications ("Appl ications") to City
for vari ous pl anni ng and devel opment approval s necessary to develop the 91. 4
acre site with a 32 acre Kaiser Hospital complex; a community shopping center;
and the 27.4 acre parcels with an additional 152 dwelling units; ("Project");
and,
Whereas, it is appropri ate that the App 1 i cant bears the cost of
consultant's services;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City, Consultant, and
Applicant do hereby mutually agree as follows:
1. Consultant's Duties
a. General Duties
The Consultant's obligation is to provide any and all
project management and pl anning consultant services as same may be requested
of Consultant by the City, by and through its City Manager, or his designee
relative to the Project.
b. Scope of Work Duties
The Consultant's duties i ncl ude but are not 1 imited to
providing those services set forth in the Scope of Work, attached hereto as
Exhibit A and to prepare any related documents for use by the City in
connection with their study ("Work Product"). In the process of providing
Services, Consultant shall help to coordinate and expedite, subject to the
JJ:-1
concurrence of the City's Representative, the various departments of the City
and other governmental agencies as may be necessary in order to accomplish the
required review of Applications in an expeditious manner avoiding unnecessary
delays and duplications of work.
c. Standard of Care
Consultant in performing any services under this
Agreement, whether Defined Services or Additional Services, shall be performed
in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised
by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions and
in similar locations.
d. Additional Special Assignments.
In addition to the foregoing obligations of Consultant,
Consultant shall negotiate, subject to the review and approval of City's
Representative, with Appl icant a schedule for the preparation and processing
of Applications, setting forth therein expected hearing dates.
e. Insurance
Consultant represents that it and its agents, staff and
consultants employed by it are protected by worker's compensation insurance
and the Consultant has the coverage under public liability and property damage
insurance pol icies which this Agreement requires to be demonstrated in the
form of a Certificate of Insurance.
Consultant will provide, prior to the commencement of the
services required under this agreement the following Certificates of Insurance
to the City prior to beginning work:
Statutory Worker's Compensat i on coverage pl us $1,000,000
Employees liability coverage.
General and Automobile Liability coverage to $1,000,000
combined single limit which names City as an additional insured, and which is
primary to any policy which the City may otherwise carry ("primary coverage"),
and which treats the employees of the City in the same manner as members of
the general publ ic ("cross-l iabil ity coverage").
All policies shall be issued by a carrier that has a
Best's Rating of "A, Class V", or better, or shall meet the approval of the
City's Risk Manager.
All pol icies shall provide that same may not be cancelled
without at least thirty (30) days written notice to the City.
All of the obligations of Consultant herein in this Section 1
contained shall be referred to as "Services".
-2-
~A-5
2. Term.
The Consultant shall commence the prOVl s 1 on of Servi ces
effective when last signed by all parties hereto, and unless otherwise sooner
terminated by the terms of this agreement, shall remain obl igated to provide
said Services until July 1, 1992, or when the amount of the Required Deposit
is exhausted, whichever is later ("Term").
3. City's Representative for Administration of Agreement.
In the absence of further designation, the Director of Planning
is hereby designated as the City Manager's designee (City's Representative").
4.
Reporting Responsibility of Consultant.
Consultant shall work for, be responsible to, and report solely
by and through City's Representative. Consultant does not work
responsible to, and shall not be required to report to, the
to the City,
for, is not
Applicant.
Applicant's Duty and Responsibility.
a. Duty to Pay for Consultant.
Applicant shall be solely responsible to City for all of
the costs of Consultant which Ci ty is or may become obl igated to pay to
Consultant by the terms of this Agreement as same may be, from time-to-time
amended, and Applicant shall promptly pay same plus 7% of same to City at or
prior to the time City is obligated to pay some to Consultant.
5.
In regard to that duty, and as a mechanism for
implementing same, Applicant shall periodically deposit with City a sum
determi ned by the Di rector of Pl anni ng; and hereby authori zes Ci ty to draw
upon said deposit in order to meet Applicant's payment obligations under this
agreement.
b. In addition to any other remedies which City may have for
breach of th is Agreement, breach of th is Agreement, breach of th is Agreement
by Applicant in any manner, including but not limited to the failure of
App 1 i cant for any reason to depos it funds on demand shall be grounds for the
refusal of City and/or Consultant, and City and/or Consultant is hereby
authorized to refuse, to continue processing the EastLake I Village Center and
EastLake Greens projects.
c. Duty of Cooperation.
In addition to the aforementioned duties, Applicant shall
provi de project i nformat i on as may be otherwi se requi red by Consultant to
fully and adequately provide the Services.
-3-
0.,... t:,
6. Duties of the City:
a. Consultation and Cooperation.
Ci ty shall regularly confer with the Consultant for the
purpose of reviewing the progress of the del ivery of Services and to provide
direction and guidance to the Consultant.
b. Compensation.
The compensation to be paid by City to Consultant for
Services shall be on a time and materials basis at the hourly billing rate of
$100 per hour for each productive hour worked; however, Consultant agrees to
perform all of the Services and deliver all of the Work Product herein
requ ired, and in the manner of the deta 11 ed scope of work set forth in the
attached Exhibit A, for not-to-exceed SIXTY THOUSAND DOLLARS ($60,000).
c. Compensation for Consultant Services shall be paid on
monthly basis 30 days after receipt of Consultant's due and proper billing.
d. City may from time to time reduce the Scope of Work by the
Consultant to be performed under this Agreement. City and Consultant agree to
meet in good faith and confer for the purpose of negotiating a corresponding
reduction in the Maximum Fee associated with said reduction.
7. Financial Interest of Consultant:
Consultant warrants and represents that neither he, nor hi s
immediate family members, nor his employees or agents ("Consultant
Associates") presently have any interest, directly or indirectly, whatsoever
in Applicant, or any partner or partnership of Applicant, or shareholder of
Applicant, or in any person, firm or entity doing business with Applicant, or
with any partner or partnership of Applicant, or in the property which is the
subject matter of the Project, or in any property within ten (10) radial miles
from the exteri or boundari es of the property whi ch is the subject matter of
the Project, or ("Prohibited Interest"), except as noted in Exhibit B.
Consultant further warrants and represents that nei ther
Consultant nor Consultant Associates are or have been, employed by Applicant,
and that no promise of future employment, remuneration, consideration,
gratui ty or other award or gain has been made to Consultant or Consultant
Associ ates. Consultant promi ses to advi se City of any such promi se that may
be made during the Term of this Agreement, or for 12 months thereafter.
Consultant agrees that neither Consultant nor his immediate
family members, nor his employees or agents, shall acquire any such Prohibited
Interest within the Term of this Agreement, or for 12 months after the
expiration of this Agreement.
-4-
A'-'- "1
Consultant may not conduct or solicit any business for any
party to this Agreement, or for any third party which may be in conflict with
Consultant's responsibilities under this Agreement.
8. Hold Harmless
Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City,
its elected and appointed officers and employees, from and against all claims
for damages, liability, cost and expense (including without limitation
attorneys' fees) ari sing out of the conduct of the Consultant, or any agency
or employees, subcontractors, or others in connect i on with the execution of
the work covered by this Agreement, except only for those claims arising from
the sole negligence or sole willful conduct of the City, its officers, or
employees. Consultant's indemnification shall include any and all costs,
expenses, attorneys' fees and 1 iabil ity incurred by the City, its officers,
agents, or employees in defending against such claims, whether the same
proceed to judgement or not. Further, Consultant at its own expense shall,
upon written request by the City, defend any such suit or action brought
agai nst the City, its offi cers, agents or employees. Consultant's
indemnification of City shall not be limited by any prior or subsequent
declaration by Consultant.
9. Termination of Agreement for Cause:
If, through any cause within Consultant's control, Consultant
shall fail to fulfill in a timely manner and proper manner its obligations
under thi s Agreement, or if Consultant shall vi olate any of the covenants,
agreements or st i pulat ions of thi s Agreement, City shall have the right to
terminate this Agreement by giving written notice to Consultant of such
termination and specifying the effective date thereof at least five (5) days
before the effective date of such termination. In that event, all finished or
unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, reports and
other materials prepared by Consultant shall, at the option of the City,
become the property of the City, and Consultant shall be entitled to receive
just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed on such
documents and other materials up to the effective date of Notice of
Termination, not to exceed the amounts payable hereunder, less any damages to
which the City may have been put by the breach, default or violation of
Consultant.
10. Termination of Agreement of Convenience of City:
City may terminate this Agreement at any time and for any
reason for giving specific written notice to Consultant of such termination
and specifying the effective date thereof, at least thirty (30) days before
the effective date of such termination. In that event, all finished and
unfi ni shed documents and other materi a 1 s descri bed in herei nabove shall, at
the option of the City, become City's sole and exclusive property. If the
Agreement is termi nated by Ci ty as provided in thi s paragraph, Consultant
shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any
satisfactory work completed on such documents and other materials to the
-5-
Jl" -9'
effect i ve date of such termi nat ion. Consultant hereby expressly wai ves any
and all claims for damages or compensation arising under this Agreement except
as set forth herein.
11. Termination of Agreement for Withdrawal of Project:
Applicant shall have the right to terminate this Agreement for
withdrawal of Applications, by giving written notice to Consultant and City of
such termination and specifying the effective date hereof at least thirty (30)
days before the effective date of such termination. In that event, all
finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, and surveys, drawings, maps,
reports and other materials prepared by Consultant shall, at the option of the
City, become the property of the City, and Consultant shall be ent i tl ed to
receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed
on such documents and other materi a 1 s up to the effective date of Notice of
Termination, not to exceed the amounts payable hereunder.
12. Assignability:
The services of Consultant are personal to the City and
Applicant, and Consultant shall not assign any interest in this Agreement, and
shall not transfer any interest in the same (whether by assignment or
novation), without prior written consent of City and Appl icant except as
outlined in the attached scope of work.
13. Ownership, Publication, Reproduction and Use of Material:
All reports, studies, information, data, statistics, forms,
design, plans, procedures, systems and any other materials or properties
produced under this Agreement shall be the sole and exclusive property of
City. No such materials or properties produced in whole or in part under this
Agreement shall be subject to private use, copyrights or patent rights by
Consultant in the United States or in any other country without the express
consent of City. City shall have the unrestricted authority to publish,
disclose as may be limited by the provisions of the Public Records Act,
distribute, and otherwise use, copyright or patent, in whole or in part, any
such reports, studi es, data, statistics, forms or other materi a 1 s or
propert i es produced under thi s Agreement. City shall provide a copy of all
such documents herein referenced to the Applicant.
14. Independent Contractor:
City is interested only in the results obtained and Consultant
shall perform as an independent contractor with sole control of the manner and
means of performing the services required under this Agreement. City
maintains the right only to reject or accept Consultant's work Products.
Consultant and any of the Consultant's agents, employees or representatives
are, for all purposes under this Agreement, an independent contractor and
shall not be deemed to be an employee of City, and none of them shall be
entitled to any benefits to which City employees are entitled including but
not limited to, overtime, retirement benefits, workers compensation benefits,
injury leave or other leave benefits.
-6-
Jl-9
15. Responsible Charge:
Consultant shall assign a project manager to project for the
duration of the project. No substitution for this position shall be allowed
without written approval from the City. The project manager for this project
shall be Bud Gray.
16. Administrative Claims Requirements and Procedures
No suit or arbitration shall be brought arising out of this
agreement, against the City unless a claim has first been presented in writing
and fi 1 ed wi th the Ci ty of Chul a Vi sta and acted upon by the Ci ty of Chul a
Vista in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 1.34 of the Chula
Vista Municipal Code, as same may from time to time be amended, the provisions
of which are incorporated by this reference as if fully set forth herein, and
such policies and procedures used by the City in the implementation of same.
Upon request by City, Consultant shall meet and confer in good
fa ith wi th city for the purpose of reso 1 vi ng any dispute over the terms of
this Agreement.
17. Attorney's Fees:
Should that dispute result in litigation, it is agreed that the
prevailing party shall be entitled to recover all reasonable costs incurred in
the defense of the claim, including costs and attorney's fees.
18. Statement of Costs:
In the event that Consultant prepares a report or document, or
part ici pates in the preparat i on of report or document as a result of the
scope-of-work required by Consultant, Consultant shall include, or cause the
inclusion, in said report or document a statement of the numbers and cost in
doll ar amounts of all contracts and subcontracts relating to the preparat i on
of the report or document.
WPC 9410P
-7-
J.J - II)
SIGNATURE PAGE TO
AGREEMENT WITH BUD GRAY AND ASSOCIATES
FOR PlANNING CONSULTANT SERVICES
WITH REGARD TO THE
EASTlAKE I VILLAGE CENTER PROJECT
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City, Appl i cant, and Consultant have executed
this Contract for Planning Services Agreement this 18th day of June 1991.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
BUD GRAY & ASSOCIATES
BY:
BY:
Tim Nader, Mayor
City of Chula Vista
Bud Gray, President
ATTEST:
EAST LAKE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
BY:
BY:
Beverly Authelet
City Clerk
Kent Aden, Vice President
of Community Development
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Bruce M. Boogaard
Applicant City Attorney
Exhibit A: Detailed Scope of Work
Exhibit B: Disclosure
WPC 9410P
-8-
JJ..- II
EXHIBIT A
A. SCOPE OF WORK
Critical review, evaluation, analysis, and report with respect to the
Applicant's request including, but not limited to the following:
1. EastLake I Village Center Project:
a. Review and report on prior City Council actions regarding
EastLake I GDP/SPA Plan, Public Facilities Financing Plan,
Planned Community District Regulations and Design Guidelines
for the Village Center.
b. Review and report on Growth Management Program and
Implementation Ordinance requirements.
c. Review and report on approved tentative subdivision map
conditions applied to EastLake I and EastLake Greens with
respect to the Village Center.
d. Revi ews, eva 1 uat i on, staff reports, and project management as
may be requested by the Director of Planning which the City
must carry out in order to approve, deny or conditionally
approve Appl icant' s appl ication for a GDP/SPA Plan Amendment,
Public Facilities Financing Plan Amendment, Precise Plan,
Conditional Use Permit, Supplemental EIR, Growth Management
Compliance, and other entitlements.
2. EastLake Greens Supplemental Density Project:
a. Review and report on prior City Council actions regarding
EastLake II General Development Plan, and EastLake Greens SPA
Plan, Planned Community District Regulations and Design
Guidelines.
b. Review and report on EastLake Greens Publ ic Facil ities Finance
Plan and Development Agreement.
c. Review and report on approved tentative subdivision map
conditions appl ied to EastLake Greens with respect to subject
four parcels.
d. Revi ews, eva 1 uat i on, and staff reports as may be requested by
the Director of Planning which the City must consider in order
to approve, deny, or conditionally approve Applicant's
appl ication for an EastLake II General Development Plan
Amendment, EastLake Greens, SPA Plan Amendment, Planned
Community District Regulations Amendment and other entitlements.
Consultant shall perform the scope of work described hereinabove and in
doing so shall review, analyze, critique, and make recommendations
regarding the various discretionary approvals to the Director of
Planning, or his designee, sought by the Applicant.
WPC 9410P
-9-
JJ. )"
EXHIBIT A
General
Development
Plan
,....
RESIDENTIAL
101M
1MO USE ACl'lES OO/"C lHTS
c:::IJ Low 24;.. 0-3 '"
~ LOW/~ 3"9.3 ,... 1833
E;j-.n 238.6 ..." 19150
.... .......","'" 1205 11-18 1e80
~"'" 8a! 1&-27 . 1672
Sl,b-TOlal 10257 1634
NON-RESIDENTIAL
L.N() l.IiIE ACRES
I c~ i ~.- -, ~:::
_ M'rr'iiatr.tlve
~ ~::"~.c~ 132"
r-o---l 0I:>en be. 1830
I PO i Pl..t::k/QuaIi-P'l.i:*:: 103:3
~ Pnl l RIcr-*'" 298..
~ MajorCi'<:Ulltion 211.15
....local 818.2
~ F\AA lit:wI 74.2
FU ..-..............
1..7"
Ptoject TatIY
2099.1 Ie
1834 au
. c...a"'.,. CI\YfC" '.1.
.
~ fASTLAKE
A PlANNED COMMUNITY BY EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT Co.
m Cinti
U & ~..=lles
~,..~
O.I.J/2~lnl ~ H-:
JJ.. 13
EXHIBIT B
PROPERTY OWNED:
1. Personal residence at 5647 Dorothy Way, San Diego, CA 92115
2. Two-bedroom condominium located at 1260-C Cleveland Street, #127, San
Diego, CA 92103
WPC 9410P
-10-
oJ; -/L{
RESOLUTION NO.~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING CONTRACT FOR SERVICES OF
BUD GRAY AS CONTRAcr PLANNER FOR EASTLAKE I AND
EASTLAKE GREENS VILLAGE CENTER AND EASTLAKE
GREENS RESIDENTIAL PROJEcrS, WAIVING BID
REQUIREMENTS, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR ro
EXECUTE SAID O)NTRAcr
The City Council of the city of Chula Vista does hereby resolve as
follows:
WHEREAS, the Eastlake Development Company has filed application with
the City of Chula vista for certain discretionary permit approvals for the
Eastlake I and Eastlake Greens Village Center involving a regional Kaiser
Permanente Hospital complex, community shopping center and a supplemental
density request for 152 dwelling units on four parcels within the Eastlake
Greens development; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Department staff availability due to other
workload requirements is not sufficient to process said application in a
timely manner; and
WHEREAS, the critical evaluation of the requested discretionary
planning permits will require extensive background knowledge of these large
scale projects as well as the City of Chula Vista's General Plan, zoning and
Growth Management policies; and
WHEREAS, the City has previously retained Mr. Gray to provide
planning services in the evaluation and processing of the Eastlake I, II and
III plans as well as project Coordinator for the General Plan Update and the
Growth Management Program; and
WHEREAS, due to the combination of Mr. Gray's knowledge of the
Eastlake development as well as his extensive experience in working with the
City of Chula Vista's General Plan and the Growth Management Program and the
applicant's expressed desire for "fast tracking" said project, the Council
hereby finds and declares that competitive bidding is impractical for purposes
of selecting a contract planner for this particular project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Chula Vista does hereby approve the contract between the City of Chula Vista
and Bud Gray, for his services as a contract planner in the Planning
Department, known as document number , a copy of which is on file
in the office of the City Clerk.
Presented by
of Chula vista is
and on behalf of
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor
hereby authorized and directed to execute said
the City.
M~~ o<mb
Robert A. Leiter
Director of Planning
WPC 9420P
Bruce M. Boogaa
City Attorney
~p. - I.S
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item~
Meeting Date 6/18/91
ITEM TITLE: Resolution \\a"\ \ Authorizing the Mayor to execute a
contract for fireworks display and entering into
Indemnification Agreements
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Parks and Recreatio~
REVIEWED BY: City Manager9h& (4/Sths Vote: Yes_No_.!.J
Planning is being finalized for the annual Fourth of July Fireworks Display to
be held in the Chula Vista bayfront. The event has been highly successful
duri ng the past several years, and is expected to draw an even 1 arger crowd
this summer.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the resol ut ion authori zi ng the Mayor to
execute a contract with San Diego Fireworks, Inc. (Attachment A) for the 1991
fireworks display and to enter into an Indemnification Agreement with Rohr
Industries (Attachment B) (for the use of their parking facil ities), and with
the San Diego Unified Port District (Attachment C).
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
The Fourth of July Fireworks display will be held on the bayfront on Thursday,
July 4, 1991. The show is scheduled to begin promptly at 9:00 p.m., and will
last approximately 20-25 minutes. San Diego Fireworks, Inc. has been selected
to do the display. San Diego Fireworks has provided the City with impressive
shows for the Fourth of July event as well as the Symphony Pops Concert finale
for the past four years. The company has done hundreds of displays within the
county, and has a sol id performance record both locally and nationwide since
1946. The fireworks will be launched from a barge anchored in the bay,
s imi lar to the arrangement duri ng 1 ast year's show. San Di ego Fi reworks has
made arrangements with KKLQ FM-106 radio to provide a musical simulcast during
the fireworks display. The station will be providing free pre-event
publicity, and is donating $3,500 worth of additional fireworks for the
display.
The San Di ego Unifi ed Port Di stri ct has been contacted concerni ng the event.
The City is bei ng asked to provi de the Port with a Cert ifi cate of Insurance
naming the Port District as an additional insured. In addition, the Port
District Activity Permit contains an indemnification agreement. The City's
Ri sk Manager has been informed about thi s requi rement. It shoul d be noted
that the Port District permit gives the Port Authority right to 24-hour
cancellation which, if exercised, would terminate the fireworks display and
could result in the loss of the contract fees.
~-I
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date 6/18/91
The Department has requested permi ssi on from Rohr Industri es to use thei r
parking lot. Their response to this request has been positive with the
condition that the City provide them with a Certificate of Insurance and an
Indemnification Agreement.
The Pol ice Department, Traffic Engineering, and the Transit Department are
coordinating plans to help relieve the anticipated traffic congestion that has
occurred in the past. Traffic in the general area will be controlled by
police officers, especially at all intersections. Free shuttle bus service
will be available to and from the area from the "H" Street trolley station,
The Bayfront Trolley station and the Palomar trolley station. All pick-up
points will be from regular City Transit bus stops.
Traffic control in the area following the event will be handled by the Police
Department. The temporary al ignment of Marina Parkway between "G" and "F"
Streets will be designated one way, with all traffic flowing north. Marina
Parkway from "G" Street south to "J" Street will be designated one way with
all traffi c fl owi ng south. One 1 ane wi 11 be des i gnated for two-way traffi c
for the excl usi ve use of the shuttl e busses and fi re and pol ice vehi cl es.
This lane will be closely barricaded and patrolled. This same traffic pattern
will be used on "J" Street between Marina Parkway and the Interstate 5
intersection, with all traffic running east. In addition, Bay Boulevard will
be closed between "H" and "J" Street to further facil itate shuttle bus
service. Traffic control officers will be on duty at all intersections in the
area until traffic out of the bayfront area has subsided. In order to provide
sufficient traffic and crowd control, the Pol ice Department will be paying
reserve and regular duty officers for their services at the event. An
estimate of required funds is included in the budget.
A centralized command post will be established so that Police, Fire, Parks and
Recreation staff, and other personnel involved with the event will know where
contact can be made in the event of any unforeseen problems or emergencies.
The command post will be establ ished just east of the intersection of "J"
Street and Marina Parkway in the vacant lot.
The cost of the 1991 Fourth of July Fireworks will be approximately $21,700.
A tentative budget has been prepared as follows:
1. Fireworks Contract (San Diego Fireworks, Inc.)
2. Rental of Barge and Tug Boat Service
3. Rental of Barricades
4. Rental of Portable Toilets
5. Additional Trash Receptacles
6. Shuttle Bus Service (Chula Vista Transit)
7. Police Reserves
8. Parks & Recreation Staff
9. Miscellaneous Expenses
$ 16,500
1,800
340
1,150
300
700
6,000
400
100
TOTAL
$ 27,290
FISCAL IMPACT: $27,290 has been
for this year's Fireworks Display.
sufficient to pay for this event.
budgeted in the non-departmental account
It is anticipated that this amount will be
WPC 1500R
~-J.
@
FIREWORKS DISPLAY AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this 18th day of June,
1991, by and between the City of Chula Vista, a California
Municipal Corporation, hereinafter called "City", and San
Diego Fireworks, Inc., a California Corporation, hereinafter
called "Contractor", is made with reference to the following
facts:
WIT N E SSE T H:
WHEREAS, City desires to provide a fireworks display
for its residents on July 4, 1991, and Contractor desires to
furnish the fireworks display to said City;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED BETWEEN THE PARTIES HERETO
AS FOLLOWS:
1. SCOPE OF WORK.
Contractor agrees to furnish to City, on July 4,
1991, in the San Diego Bay, on a barge off the Chula Vista
Marina in accordance with the terms and conditions herein-
after set forth, one (1) Fireworks Display as set forth in
Program "An, attached hereto as Exhibit "A",' incorporated
herein and made a part hereof as though set forth in full,
including the services of one (1) licensed pyrotechnician to
take charge of and fire the Display with sufficient helpers.
1.1 City'S Duty to Provide Suitable Site.
City shall furnish and provide at their own expense a
suitable site and location. Suitability of any proposed
site is to be determined solely by Contractor. If City
proposes a site on water, City shall furnish and provide, at
their own expense, suitable floats or scows, including
provisions for towing and handling of same. The operations
of Contractor are considered complete with the crew and
equipment of Contractor depart the site.
2. Cancellation by Contractor. In the event Contractor
reasonably determines the weather conditions unfavorable on
the date set for the display, City shall pay Contractor ten
percent (lot) of the contract price as a restocking fee and
costs incurred by Contractor for technician fees, custom set
piece and logo designZ, permit and insurance.
july491A.wp
June 12, 1991
1991 July 4th Display Contract
Page 1
cQ3- 3
3. Cancellation by City. Should city decide to cancel the
display, notice shall be given to Contractor no later than
nine o'clock A.M. on the day of the display. City shall pay
Contractor ten percent (10%) of the contract price as a
restocking fee and all costs incurred by Contractor
including, but not limited to, technician fees, custom set
piece and logo design, permit and insurance.
4. Postponement. In the event of cancellation by Contrac-
tor as provided in Paragraph 2 herein, or cancellation by
City as provided in paragraph 3 herein, City shall not be
liable and responsible to pay Contractor ten percent (10%)
of the contract price as a restocking fee and all costs
incurred by Contractor provided the parties agree to another
date for the display prior to 9:00 A.M. on the day of the
display. City shall be liable only for the expenses
incurred by Contractor due to the postponement if the
parties have agreed upon a postponement date, or the City
has tendered a reasonable postponement date.
S. ASSUMPTION OF RISK FOR WEATHER RUINING EXHIBITS.
City agrees to assume the risk of damage to the Exhibit
by weather or other causes beyond the control of Contractor,
which may affect or damage such portion of the exhibits as
must be placed in position and exposed a necessary time
before the scheduled commencement of the Display. By
assuming said risk, City agrees to pay for Contractor's cost
of said destroyed or ruined exhibits, unless the City is
otherwise obligated to pay the Contractor the compensation
required by this agreement.
6. DISPLAY PROTECTION.
City shall provide adequate police or security service
to prevent the public from entering the areas designated
solely by the Contractor for the firing of the display and
fallout. Any vehicles or personal property within these
areas shall be removed at the expense of City. Any damage
to personal property and injuries or death to persons
remaining within these areas shall be the sole
responsibility and liability of City. City shall indemnify,
defend and hold harmless Contractor against such claims as
provided in paragraph eight (8) herein. City shall also be
responsible and liable for any damage or theft of equipment
or materials of Contractor caused by the public.
7. INSURANCE.
july491A.wp
June 12, 1991
1991 July 4th Display Contract
Page 2
J3-1-
Contractor, shall, throughout the duration of this
Agreement, maintain the following insurance coverage:
7.1 Commercial General Liability Insurance including
Business automobile liability insurance in the amount of
$1,000,000, combined single limit, which names the city of
Chula Vista as additional insured and is primary to any
insurance policy carried by the City.
7.2 Errors and omissions insurance in the amount of
$250,000.
3. statutory Worker's Compensation Insurance and
Employer's Liability Insurance in the amount of $1,000,000.
All policies shall be issued by a carrier that has a
Best's Rating of "A", Class "V", or better or shall meet
with the approval of the City'S Risk Manager.
Contractor will provide, prior to commencement of the
services required under this Agreement, certificates of
insurance for the coverage required in this section, and,
for Commercial General Liability Insurance, a policy
endorsement for the City as additional insured; a policy
endorsement stating the Contractor's insurance is primary
and a policy endorsement stating that the limits of
insurance apply separately to each project away from
premises owned or rented by the Contractor. Certificates of
insurance must also state that each policy may not be
canceled without at least thirty (30) days written notice to
the City.
The provisions of this section are intended to be of
benefit only to the City, and not for the advantage or
benefit of any third party. The City shall have the sole
right to insist upon or waive their performance without
liability to any third party.
8. tHOLD HARMLESS.
8.1 City's Indemnity. city shall indemnify, defend
and hold Contractor harmless and the property of Contractor
from and against any and all claims, losses, damages, suits,
injuries and liabilities arising from the death or injury to
any person or from damage to or destruction of any property,
which arises out of, or is caused by an act, omission,
negligence or misconduct on the part of City or any of
City'S officers, agents, servants, employees, contractors,
guests, invitees or licensees. The provisions of this
july491A.wp
June 12, 1991
1991 July 4th Display Contract
Page 3
)3-5
. .
.ection shall not apply to any claim or liability arlslng by
reason of the sole negligence, gross negligence or willful
aisconduct of City.
8.2. Contractor's Indemnity. Contractor shall
indemnify, defend and hold harmless Contractor and the
property of Contractor from and against any and all claims,
losses, damages, suits, injuries and liabilities arising
from the death or injury to any person or from damage to or
destruction of any property, which arises out of or is
caused by an act, omission, negligence or misconduct on the
part of Contractor or any of Contractor's officers, agents,
servants, employees, contractors, guests, invitees or
licensees. The provisions of this section shall not apply
to any claim or liability arising by reason of the sole
negligence, gross negligence or willful misconduct of city.
9. COMPENSATION.
City agrees to pay Contractor the sum of Sixteen
Thousand Five Hundred ($16,500.00) Dollars according to the
following terms and conditions, due and payable as follows:
Fifty (50%) percent deposit upon execution of this agree-
ment, and the balance due ten (10) days after date of
Display, plus one (1%) percent service charge on accounts
over thirty (30) days past due.
10. ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS.'
This contract shall be governed by the laws of the
State of California. Should any legal action be brought to
enforce or interpret the terms or provisions of this
agreement, any court of competent jurisdiction located in
the County of San Diego, California shall be proper venue
for an action. If any legal action is brought to enforce or
interpret the terms or provisions of this agreement, the
prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's
fees and costs in addition to any other relief to which they
may be entitled.
11. PARTIES INDEPENDENCE.
It is further agreed that nothing in this Agreement
shall be construed as forming a partnership, the Parties
hereto being severally responsible for their own separate
debts and obligations, and neither Party shall be held
1. This is the clause in their standard agreement.
july491A.wp
June 12, 1991
1991 July 4th Display Contract
Page 4
.l3-~
responsible for any agreements not stipulated in this
Agreement.
12. NOTICE TO PARTIES.
Any Notice to Parties required under this Agreement to
be given to either party may be given by deposition in the
United States mail, postage prepaid, first class, a notice
addressed to the following:
City:
City of Chula Vista
Attn: Beverly Authelet, City Clerk
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, California 91910
Contractor:
San Diego Fireworks, Inc.
P.O. Box 203186
San Diego, CA 92120
13. SUCCESSORS.
The terms, conditions and payments of this Agreement
shall be binding upon the Parties themselves and on their
heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns.
14. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
All terms of this Agreement are in writing and may only
be modified by written Agreement of the Parties hereto.
Both Parties acknowledge they have received a copy of said
written Agreement and agree to be bound by said terms of
written agreement only.
july491A.wp
June 12, 1991
1991 July 4th Display Contract
Page 5
~-7
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Parties hereto, by and through
their duly authorized agents, have set their hands and seals
as of the day and year first above written.
City of Chula Vista,
A Municipal Corporation.
by:
its Mayor
ATTEST:
Beverly Authelet, City Clerk
(SEAL)
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
BRUCE M. BOOGAARD,
City Attorney
San Diego Fireworks, Inc.,
a California Corporation
By
Ron Dixon, President
july491A.wp
June 12, 1991
1991 July 4th Display Contract
Page 6
J23 - <8'
E l' ~ \ a \ ,.- "A."
t.
BILL OF MATERIALS
PREPARED FOR
City of Chula Vista
July 4,1991
Program A
AERIAL FIREWORKS DISPLAY:
40 3- Assorted Brilliant Color Aerial Shells
30 3- Assorted Fancy Pattern and Multiple Color Aerial Shells
25 3- Assorted Oriental Floral Pattern Aerial Shells
20 3- Assorted Special Effects Aerial Shells
15 3- Assorted Deluxe Special Effect Aerial Shells
30 4- Assorted Brilliant Color Aerial Shells
25 4- Assorted Fancy Pattern and Multiple Color Aerial Shells
20 4- Assorted Oriental Floral Pattern Aerial Shells
15 4- Assorted Special Effects Aerial Shells
10 4- Assorted Deluxe Special Effect Aerial Shells
20 5- Assorted Brilliant Color Aerial Shells
15 5- Assorted Fancy Pattern and Multiple Color Aerial Shells
15 5- Assorted Oriental Floral Pattern Aerial Shells
7 5- Assorted Special Effects Aerial Shells
5 5- Assorted Deluxe Special Effect Aerial Shells
f 12 6- Assorted Brilliant Color Aerial Shells
t
. 10 6- Assorted Fancy Pattern and Multiple Color Aerial Shells
I 8 6- Assorted Oriental Floral Pattern Aerial Shells
5 6- Assorted Special Effects Aerial Shells
Page 1
~3-9
BILL OF MATERIALS .-
f " PREPARED FOR
City of Chula Vista
July 4, 1991
Program A
5 T Special Pattem Aerial Shells
6 8" Assorted Brilliant Color Aerial Shells
5 8" Assorted Fancy Pattem and Multiple Color Aerial Shells
4 8" Assorted Oriental Floral Pattem Aerial Shells
3 8" Assorted Special Effects Aerial Shells
2 10" Assorted Fancy Pattern and Multiple Color Aerial Shells
2 10" Assorted Oriental Floral Pattem Aerial Shells
2 10" Assorted Special Effects Aerial Shells
1 12" Fancy Pattem and Multiple Color Aerial Shell
1 12" Oriental Floral Pattem Aerial Shell
1 12" Special Effects Aerial Shell
GRAND AERIAL FINALE:
100 2.5" Brilliant Color Aerial Finale Shells
100 3" Aerial Titanium Flash Salutes
100 3" Assorted Brilliant Color Aerial Finale Shells
40 4" Assorted Brilliant Color Aerial Finale Shells
, 1 10" Nishiki Kamuro Crown Chrysanthemum
t Total Price of Display: $16,500.00
Total Shells in Program: 700
Page 2
~'-ID
I
.~
BILL OF MATERIALS
ADDITIONAL FIREWORKS PROVIDED BY
KKLQ-Q106FM
July 4, 1991
Program A
FIREWORKS RADIO NETWORK
AERIAL FIREWORKS DISPLAY:
20 4" Assorted Brilliant Color Aerial Shells
16 4" Assorted Fancy Pattern and Multiple Color Aerial Shells
12 4" Assorted Oriental Floral Pattem Aerial Shells
10 4" Assorted Special Effects Aerial Shells
10 5" Assorted Brilliant Color Aerial Shells
8 5" Assorted Fancy Pattern and Multiple Color Aerial Shells
6 5" Assorted Oriental Floral Pattem Aerial Shells
4 5" Assorted Special Effects Aerial Shells
5 6" Assorted Brilliant Color Aerial Shells
4 6" Assorted Fancy Pattern and Multiple Color Aerial Shells
3 6" Assorted Oriental Floral Pattern Aerial Shells
1 8" Brilliant Color Aerial Shell
1 8" Fancy Pattem and Multiple Color Aerial Shell
1 8" Oriental Floral Pattem Aerial Shell
.
LOW LEVEL AND GROUND EFFECTS:
i
1 Each
8' X 8' Rreworks Radio Network Sponsors' Logo in fire.
Bouquets of Brilliant Color Pearl Roman Candles
Bouquets of Flashing Thunder Roman Candles
2 Each
2 Each
Page 1
J3-11
.
1
"
BILL OF MATERIALS
ADDITIONAL FIREWORKS PROVIDED BY
KKLQ-Q106FM
July 4, 1991
Program A
FIREWORKS RADIO NElWORK
> >
PROFESSIONAL SERVICES PROVIDED:
- Choreographic services to match the combined Bills of Materials to the
sound track provided.
- Firing Cue Communications system to facilitate synchronization
of the bursts to the posts of the sound track.
- Multi-track broadcast quality patriotic themed sound track.
- Promotional posters provided acknowledging the event and sponsors.
- Promotional .On-Air" spots promoting the Fireworks Radio Network.
- Technical Support to the firing cue communications syslem.
- Membership in the Nations largest Independence Day Celebration.
Price of your Program: $16.500.00
Value of Sponsorship: $3.500.00
Total Program Value: $20,000.00
Shells In Your Program: 700
Shells in Sponsorship: 101
Total Shells in your show: 801
. Total Devices in Display: 5
.
.
>
Page 2
d.3 -)~
@
INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT
The City of Chula Vista agrees to indemnify and hold harmless Rohr Industries
from any liability arising from its use of property at the parking lot. leased
by Rohr Industries, located at Tidelands Avenue and "G" Street, in order
to allow for the July 4, 1991, fireworks display. The City of Chula Vista
also agrees to defend Rohr Industries in any litigation arising from this
activity.
Date:
Tim Nader
Mayor of the City of Chula Vista
;13-) :3
.,
.
(
(
l
..
@
fCO.
DATE June 18. 1991
SAN DIEGO UNIFIED PORT DISTRICT
TIDELAND ACTIVITY PERMIT
PERMITTEE:
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
USE OR ACTIVITY:
FOURTH OF JULY FIREWORKS SHOW
LOCATION FOR WHICH PERMIT ISSUED:
BAYFRONT BETWEEN "G" AND "J" STS
EFFECTIVE DATES (No IIIore than JO days): July 4. 1991
SECURITY DEPOSIT: S -0-
THIS PERMIT FOR TIDELAND USE IS ISSUED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING
TERMS AND CONDITIONS:
1. Permittee shall comply with all apolicable laws, rules
and regulations of the District and other governmental entities.
2. Permittee shall keep the property and all equipment used
in connection with this permit in a clean, safe and sanitary manner
and in good reoair at all times. Allor any portion of the security
depoSit shall be available unconditionally to the District for the
purpose of cleaning or repairing damages to the property upon ter-
mination of this permit.
3. This permit may be cancelled by either party by the giving
of twenty-four (24) hours notice in writing to the other party.
Such cancellation shall be without liability of any nature.
4. .This permit shall not be transferred or assigned.
5. P~rmittee shall defend, indemnify, and hol~ harmless
District, its officers and employees agai~st all causes of action,
for Judicial relief of any kind, for damage to proper~y of any kind
whatsoever,_ and to whomever belonging, inClUding Permittee, or in-
Jury to Or death of any person or persons, including employees of
Permittee, resultin9 directly or indirectly from activities in c~n-
nection with the issuance and performance of this permit or arislng
from the use of the property, facilities or services of District.
its Officers or employees.
. ;23 -1'1
.......
- .
,
(
(
l
. '" . ;. .",.
5. Pe~ittee shall maintain comprehensive public liability
(covering operations, prOducts and completed operations) and blanket
contractual coverage insurance throughout the term of this permit.
The policies shall, as a minimum. provide the following forms of
coverage: 0 0 1 lOOt
$ 1 million comb10ed SlOg e 1m1
~ Personll Injury aA~ 8e~ily Injwry:
0"1 PerlOA $
ORe Occur"'AC' S g,e.a A.6o\JE..
(8) Pro"eroty Dlluge $
Certificates of such insurance, in a form satisfactory to the District,
shall be filed with District's Community and ~overnment Affairs De-
part.ent. Insurance certificates. filed pursuant to this permit shall
contain a non-cancellation-without-notice clause and shall provide
that copies of cancellation notices shall be sent to the District.
7. The rights and privileges extended by this permit are non-
exclusive.
8. Permittee shall not engage in any activity on property of
the District other than the activity for which this permit is e~pressly
issuea.
9. Permittee shall be subject to and comply with any speCial
~onditions attached hereto.
10. Permittee shall comoly with all reauirements and directives
of the Port Directo~ of District.
11. In the event of failure of Permittee to comply with any
provision of this permit. this permit may. at the discretion of the
Port Director, be terminated immediately.
SAN DIEGO UNIFIED PORT DISTRICT
By
Permittee hereby accepts this permit and agrees to comply with all the
terms and conditions thereof.
APPROVED as to form:
JOSEPH D. PATELLO
Port Attorney
Per~ttee's signature
Address: Citv of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Ave
Chula Vista, CA 91910
~3-J!5 .
RESOLUTION NO.~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE A
CONTRACT FOR FIREWORKS DISPLAY AND ENTERING
INTO INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENTS
The City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, planning is being finalized for the annual
Fourth of July Fireworks Display to be held at the Chula Vista
Bayfront and it is necessary to enter into agreements for the
event.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula vista does hereby authorize the Mayor to
execute a contract with San Diego Fireworks for the 1991
fireworks display and to enter into an Indemnification Agreement
with Rohr Industries for the use of their parking facilities and
with the San Diego Unified Port District, copies of which are on
file in the office of the City Clerk.
d as
by
~
Presented by
Jess Valenzuela, Director of
Parks and Recreation
8964a
y Attorney
c93-1(,
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
ITEM
~~
MEETING DATE
June 18. 1991
ITEM TITLE:
RESOLUTION ,"t\9.. finding that the salaries of the Mid-
Management, Executive and Unrepresented groups are unfixed and
uncertain as of June 28. 1991.
SUBMITTED BY: DIRECTOR OF PERSONNELC0
REVIEWED BY: CITY MANAGERtr~ (4/Sth Vote: Yes___ NO___)
The consulting firm of Ralph Anderson & Associates is in the process of
completing the Mid-Management salary survey started earlier this year.
Additionally, Personnel Department staff is in the process of conducting
Executi ve and Unrepresented salary surveys. Whi 1 e the IAFF, POA and CVEA
bargai ni ng units will recei ve salary increases effective June 28, 1991. it is
clear that recommendations will not be formulated for the other groups by that
date. Therefore. it is recommended that those salaries remain unfixed and
uncertain until such time as the City Manager makes formal recommendations as to
the appropriate salary increases.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the resolution finding that the salaries of
the Mid-Management, Executive and Unrepresented groups are unfixed and uncertain
as of June 28. 1991.
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATIONS: N/A
DISCUSSION: Earlier this year the City contracted with the consulting firm of
Ralph Anderson & Associates to conduct a detailed salary survey and internal
a 1 i gnment study for the cl assifi cat ions in the Mi d-Management group. Thi s
process has been lengthy and involved. however remains relatively on schedule.
At the same time. the Personnel Department staff has been conducti ng salary
surveys for Executive Management and Unrepresented classifications and
anticipates completion of that study at the same time (probably mid-July).
While those associations who have three-year contracts (CVEA, IAFF, and POA) are
provided increases effective June 28. 1991. the California constitution prohibits
retroactive pay for services already performed; thus complicating our ability to
provide retro-active increases for the Mid-Management, Executive and
Unrepresented groups. However, since we are in the process of these salary
studies. it is possible to find that the salaries in question become unfixed and
uncertain as of June 28. 1991 and remain so until salaries are set by the City
Manager.
FISCAL IMPACT:
No fiscal impact.
A:\(A113)\MIDEXEC.SAI.
~4 -)
J
RESOLUTION NO.~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA FINDING THAT THE SALARIES OF THE
MID-MANAGEMENT, EXECUTIVE AND UNREPRESENTED
GROUPS ARE UNFIXED AND UNCERTAIN AS OF JUNE
28, 1991
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the consulting firm of Ralph Anderson &
Associates is in the process of completing the Mid-Management
salary survey started and Personnel Department staff is in the
process of conducting Executive and unrepresented salary surveys;
and
WHEREAS, while those associations who have three-year
contracts (CVEA, lAFF, and POA) are provided increases effective
June 28, 1991, the California Constitution prohibits retroactive
pay for services already performed; thus complicating the City
ability to provide retro-active increases for the Mid-Management,
Executive and unrepresented groups; and
WHEREAS, since the City is in the process of these
salary studies, it is possible to find that the salar ies in
question become unfixed and uncertain as of June 28, 1991 and
remain so until salaries are set by the City Manager, or the City
Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula Vista does hereby grant an increase effective
June 28, 1991 in the salaries of the Mid-Management, Executive
and Unrepresented groups in an amount to be determined by the
City at a later time, and accordingly finds that the salaries of
the Mid-Management, Executive and unrepresented groups are
unfixed and uncertain as of June 28, 1991.
orm by
Presented by
as
;l
Candy Boshell, Director of
Personnel
8959a
Bruce M.
torney
~v-~
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
Meeting Date
JS
6/18/91
ITEM TITLE: Report: Application for Rental
Rehabilitation Program funds for FY 1991-1992
Resolution \~~\~ Approving Rental
Rehabilitation Program description and
related documents, and authorizing submittal
to HUD
SUBMITTED BY: Community Development Director 0? .
REVIEWED BY: City Manage~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes___No_X_)
The city is participating in the U. S. Department of Housing
and Urban Development Rental Rehabilitation Program for FY
1990-1991, having been allocated $68,000. Our allocation
for FY 1991-1992 is $37,000. This allocation of funds is in
addition to other funds that the City receives from the
federal government. In order to receive these funds we must
submit an application to HUD.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the resolution approving
the Rental Rehabilitation Program and documents for FY 1991-
1992, and authorizing the submittal to HUD.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
The Rental Rehabilitation Program (RRP) which was created by
the 1983 Housing and Urban-Rural Recovery Act is designed to
improve the supply of rental housing units affordable to
lower-income families. The RRP uses a dual approach.
First, it provides grants to localities for rehabilitation
assistance to private property owners of substandard multi-
family units occupied by lower-income families, and it also
provides rental subsidies through the local housing
authority to the low-income tenants of the rehabilitated
units to assure housing affordability. The provision of the
rental subsidies to the units' tenants avoids those frequent
circumstances where the debt service incurred by property
owners is passed on to the tenants to the degree that the
tenant's rents are no longer affordable.
The creation of the RRP reflects the federal emphasis on
improving and preserving the nation's existing housing stock
~-I
rather than underwriting new housing construction. The
program also responds to the Federal trend towards local
determination. After establishing basic benefit and
management requirements, the enabling act allows broad
opportunities for local program design and flexibility.
Our allocation for this year is $37,000. Last year we
received $68,000. The amount of funds allocated to each
jurisdiction is based on a formula which considers the
following local factors: the number of low-income rental
households; the number of rental units built to 1940; and
the number of rental units with overcrowding, high rent
costs, incomplete kitchen facilities, or incomplete
plumbing. The City is receiving a significant reduction in
funding because the amount of authorized funding for the RRP
in Fiscal Year 1991 was less than in Fiscal Year 1990.
The attached program description which has previously been
approved by Council has been updated to incorporate
information on our recent housing rehabilitation activities
and qualifications.
FISCAL IMPACT:
the recommended
by HUD.
No general fund monies would be involved in
action. Program expenses would be provided
J5..,2.
1
RENTAL REHABILITATION PROGRAM
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION
The City of Chula vista will encourage and assist in the
rehabilitation of residential rental units in Chula vista
under the Rental Rehabilitation Program authorized by the U.
S. community Development and Urban-Rural Recovery Act of
1983. Grant and rental subsidy resources available from HUD
will be used to increase the stock of standard rental
housing in the City and to assure the affordability of such
housing to lower income families. The program has been
designed to maximize both improvement assistance to
substandard rental units which will house larger families
and affordability to very low-income households.
I. PROGRAM ACTIVITIES
In FY 1991-1992, the city of Chula vista will encourage and
assist in the rehabilitation of approximately 5 rental
dwelling units. The program will be pursued by the City's
existing staff responsible for the City's Community Housing
Improvement Program (CHIP) which is funded by the City of
Chula vista Redevelopment Agency's Low and Moderate Income
Housing Fund. Rental projects in the targeted neighborhoods
will be identified for assistance consideration, using the
Housing Rehabilitation Specialist/Code Enforcement Officer
and the Housing Rehabilitation Administrator. Projects
evidencing substandard conditions and predominant occupancy
by lower income tenants will be encouraged to apply for
program assistance. Proposed projects will be evaluated by
the Loan Committee of the existing CHIP Rehabilitation
Program for satisfaction of program goals. Approved
projects will be referred to a City-selected lender or loan
processor, for both market rate private rehabilitation loans
and program loans. Program loans will be in the form of
ten-year, 0% interest deferred loans, forgiven in full at
term, provided the owner does not discriminate or convert
the property to condominiums during the term of the loan.
Maximum assistance will be 50% of the per unit
rehabilitation cost, to a maximum of $6500 per unit for one
bedroom units, $7500 per unit for two bedroom units, and
$8500 per unit for units with three or more bedroom units.
Program loans and attendant prohibitions will be secured by
a lien on the subject property. Affected eligible tenants
will receive a preference for section 8 Existing rental
subsidies from the San Diego County Housing Authority.
Affected lower income tenants not suitably housed in
rehabilitated units will receive technical and financial
relocation assistance from program funds.
~-3
2
Two staff members will be working on the Rental
Rehabilitation Program, Tony ciotti and Roger Jones. Mr.
Ciotti has been the City's Housing Rehabilitation
Coordinator for 13 years, and he has been certified by NAHRO
as a Rehabilitation Finance Specialist. He has primary
responsibility for the administration and execution of the
program. Roger Jones is the City's Housing Rehabilitation
Specialist, and he is certified by NAHRO as a Rehabilitation
Construction Specialist. He conducts the initial
inspections to determine Code violations and items in need
of rehabilitation.
II. NEIGHBORHOOD SELECTION
The Rental Rehabilitation Program will be operated in the
CHIP target neighborhoods. These neighborhoods are among
the lowest income neighborhoods in the city, with 1980
Census data indicating that the median income in the Census
Tracts these neighborhoods comprise is below 80% of the area
median income. These neighborhoods are a mix of single-
family and multifamily units, with the great majority of
rental rates being below prevailing market rates in Chula
vista and below the current section 8 Existing Fair Market
Rents. Capital Improvement activities and redevelopment of
the surrounding commercial areas promise to revitalize these
declining neighborhoods, but the modest nature of the
housing stock and the scope of the revitalization activities
will not result in gentrification of the neighborhoods.
Rent levels will rise over the next five years, but not at
as great a rate as rents in the market area.
Selection of the neighborhoods is based on 1980 Census data,
A Housinq Studv of the citv of Chula Vista, dated May 1984,
and field observation.
III. LOWER INCOME BENEFIT
A minimum of 70% of the rental rehabilitation grant will be
used to assist lower income families. One-hundred percent
lower income benefit will be striven for, but achieving that
level is unlikely. No neighborhoods in Chula Vista are so
significantly lower income, and no rental projects are so
significantly substandard, that more than 70% low income
occupancy of a rental project would likely be encountered.
If 100% lower income occupancy were necessary, significant
numbers of non-lower income families would have to be
displaced by the property owner/applicant, which the city
feels is an unacceptable circumstance. Given the
characteristics of the Chula Vista neighborhoods and the
displacement which would result, no practical program design
exists which would achieve 100% low income benefit level.
Through the public hearing process to consider the program
description, the public has been consulted regarding the
inability to achieve a 100% lower income benefit level.
J~-~
3
IV. USE OF RENTAL REHABILITATION GRANTS FOR HOUSING FOR
FAMILIES
A minimum of 70% of the units assisted under the program
will be two-bedroom or larger. First priority for
assistance will go to three bedroom units. As apartment
projects in Chula vista seldom contain three bedroom units,
outreach will be concentrated on rental duplexes. All
assistance given under the program will be approved by the
City's CHIP Loan Committee, using as one of their criteria
for project selection the goal of a minimum of 70% total
program assistance to units of two bedrooms or larger and
highest priority to three-bedroom units.
V. USE OF RENTAL REHABILITATION GRANTS FOR UNITS IN
SUBSTANDARD CONDITION THAT ARE OCCUPIED BY VERY LOW-INCOME
FAMILIES
Priority will be given to projects with substandard units
occupied by very low-income families. All assistance given
under the program will be approved by the City'S CHIP Loan
Committee, using as one of their criteria for project
selection the priority to projects with substandard units
occupied by very low-income families.
VI. SELECTION OF PROPOSALS
Proposals will be selected by the CHIP Loan Committee based
on the following criteria:
a. Correction of substandard units, especially those
occupied by very low income families.
b. predominance of assistance to large families in
lower-income categories, with a minimum of 70% of
all units assisted being two bedrooms or larger,
and with highest priority going to three-bedroom
units.
c. Maximum stimulation of private investment.
d. Minimization of displacement of tenants.
The Loan Committee will also evaluate the pro forma and loan
processing information in order to select financially
feasible projects with maximum program benefit. Operating
income and replacement reserve levels will be considered.
The Loan Committee will consider the distribution of Section
8 Existing Vouchers to a project or the provision of
financial relocation assistance in their evaluation of
program benefit. Relocation expenses paid to project unit
~~5
4
displacees will be deducted from the per unit maximum
assistance levels.
VII. FINANCIAL FEASIBILITY
The Rental Rehabilitation Program will be financially
feasible. Private funds will be available through private
lending institutions, with lending services for both program
deferred loans and private loans obtained from the Bank of
America.
VIII. NEIGHBORHOOD PRESERVATION
Neighborhood preservation is currently under way in the
target neighborhood, using the City of Chula Vista
Redevelopment Agency Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund
and program income from rehabilitation loans made in the
past years using CDBG funds for housing rehabilitation,
Block Grant-funded Capital Improvement Projects, and Block
Grant-funded social service activities. Additional property
improvement under the program will further enhance
neighborhood preservation in target areas.
IX. SCHEDULE FOR COMMITTING RENTAL REHABILITATION GRANT
AMOUNTS
Specific projects have not yet been selected for the
program, but as the City operates an existing multifamily
rehabilitation program using Redevelopment Agency and CDBG
program income funds as previously mentioned. Therefore,
projects suitable for this program can be easily identified.
All staff and mechanisms for processing and approving loans
are in place.
Our best local estimate is that the average subsidy per unit
will be $7500. Therefore, the program would rehabilitate
approximately 5 units in 12 months. As it would be most
advantageous for the Loan Committee to evaluate a number of
project proposals simultaneously, project proposals will be
batched for consideration. The total grant amount should be
committed by May 31, 1992. .
X. NEED FOR RENTAL HOUSING ASSISTANCE
Not applicable.
XI. NON-DISCRIMINATION AND EQUAL OPPORTUNITY
Affirmative marketing and fair housing principles will be
pursued by the program. The program will not participate in
unit marketing, but property owners will be counseled in
affirmative marketing principles and monitored for
compliance.
~~-b
5
The city will provide fair housing counseling to owners of
assisted units and to perspective tenants. The following
steps will be taken:
a. written material on Federal Fair Housing Laws will
be distributed to owners and tenants. All
advertisements or public announcements regarding
the program will include the Equal Housing
Opportunity logo.
b. Each unit assisted through the Rental
Rehabilitation Program will be marketed in a manner
to affirmatively further fair housing, including
but not limited to the following:
1) Listing available units with the Section 8
Existing Marketing Section of the Housing
Authority
2) Attempting to fill vacant units with families
who are active certificate holders through the
Section 8 program, or who are applicants on the
waiting list for Section 8 certificates or
vouchers.
3) Using the Equal Housing Opportunity logo in any
newspaper advertisement or written
communication to community groups,
organizations, agencies, or other community
contacts.
Owners will utilize various community contacts to advertise
unit availability to those persons in the housing market
area least likely to apply for the unit. Applications will
be solicited from such individuals.
The City will gather and maintain records to demonstrate
compliance as follows:
a. Copies of all written material regarding vacant
units for rent will be kept by the property owner
and by the city. Records will be kept of
applications received in response to available
vacancies.
b. The City will periodically review affirmative
marketing efforts by owners to ensure compliance
with Equal Housing opportunity provisions. When an
owner has failed to follow affirmative marketing
requirements, appropriate actions, available under
program regulations and/or applicable laws, will be
taken to enforce conformity. In cases where
housing discrimination is established to have
occurred, such established housing descrimination
J{-?
6
shall be a condition of default on program deferred
loans.
Owners will be encouraged to comply with provisions of
affirmative marketing of the units for no less than seven
years after the completion date of rehabilitation of all
units in the project.
XII. GRANTEE ORGANIZATION STRUCTURE
The Rental Rehabilitation Program contact person for the
city of Chula vista is: David Gustafson, Assistant Director
of Community Development, city of Chula vista 276 Fourth
Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910.
XIII. PUBLIC HOUSING AUTHORITY PARTICIPATION
The Housing Authority of the County of San Diego operates
the section 8 Existing Vouchers Program for the City of
Chula vista. Eligible tenants in rehabilitation units
receive preference for section 8 certificates from the
Housing Authority.
The Authority's section 8 Existing contact person is:
Josephine Silva, Chief, Housing Programs, Housing Authority
of the County of San Diego, 7917 Ostrow Street, San Diego,
CA 92111-3694, at (619) 694-4803.
XIV. CERTIFICATIONS
The necessary certifications are attached. They were
approved by City Council Resolution for FY 1991-1992 on June
18, 1991.
xv. RECENT REHABILITATION ACTIVITIES
The City offers loans and grants for the rehabilitation of
rental units, owner occupied single family dwellings, and
mobilehomes. The following chart illustrates the number of
units rehabilitated and the amount of funds spent over the
past 6 fiscal years.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
HOUSING REHABILITATION
FISCAL YEARS 1985-1991
FY 1985-86
No. of Single Family Dwellings
No. of Mobilehomes
Total Funds Spent
27
24
$399,422.00
~~~
FY 1986-87
No. of Single Family Dwellings 24
No. of Mobilehomes 31
Total Funds Spent $591,129.00
FY 1987-88
No. of Single Family Dwellings 34
No. of Mobilehomes 13
Total Funds Spent $980,508.65
FY 1988-89
No. of Single Family Dwellings 21
No. of Mobilehomes 15
Total Funds Spent $569,346.77
FY 1989-90
No. of Single Family Dwellings 22
No. of Mobilehomes 12
Total Funds Spent $824,520.14
FY 1990-91
No. of single Family Dwellings 14
No. of Mobilehomes 37
Total Funds Spent $501,334.96
tP.! - 7
7
RENTAL REHABILITATION PROGRAM TENANT ASSISTANCE POLICY
I. INTENT
The Chula vista Rental Rehabilitation Program will seek
to minimize the permanent displacement of residential
rental tenants as a result of program activities. In
cases where permanent displacement of low income
families (less than 80% of median income) is
unavoidable, financial and technical relocation
assistance will be provided to those families. Very
low-income families (less than 50% of median income)
will not be permanently displaced in favor of non very
low-income families. Cost and assistance needs
resulting from temporary displacement of tenants during
property improvement will be the responsibility of the
property owner and will not be paid from program funds.
The Rental Rehabilitation Program will be administered
so as to not cause the displacement of persons because
of their particular race, color, religion, sex, age,
handicap, or natural origin.
II. DEFINITIONS OF DISPLACEMENT
A. Non low-income families moving from a unit
undergoing rehabilitation under the program will
not be considered displacees under the Tenant
Assistance Program:
B. Low-income and very low-income families will be
considered displacees if their displacement is a
direct result of program activity and not an action
for cause.
C. Examples: of program related displacement include,
but are not limited to, unit underutilization, unit
overcrowding, housing cost overpayment (family
paying more than 30% of monthly gross income for
housing expenses), or tenant ineligibility to
section 8. Existing rental subsidy assistance as a
result of unit rent exceeding section 8 Fair Market
Rent. No tenant will be considered displaced if
the tenant has been offered a decent, safe, and
sanitary dwelling unit in the project at an
affordable rent. Qualification as displacees will
be solely determined by the City.
III. A. Displacees will receive either section 8 rental
subsidy assistance, or relocation assistance under
the provisions for permanent displacement of the
U. S. Uniform Relocation Assistance and Property
efl{ -/0
Acquisition Act of 1970, at the option of the
city. provisions of the Act include technical
assistance, moving allowances, and rental
differential payments. Displacees receiving
section 8 certificates will also be eligible for
technical assistance and moving allowances.
B. Technical assistance will include information and
counseling to familiarize Displacees with
opportunities to select appropriate replacement
housing within the full range of available
housing, with individual rights under the federal
Fair Housing Law, and with methods for searching
for suitable replacement housing.
C. No displacees will be discriminated against in the
provision of information, counseling, referrals,
or other relocation services.
,U -II/ ~S -15
APPLICATION FOR 2. DATe aU8WlTTEO Appl'icant Identifier
FEDERAL ASSISTANCE 6/21/91
1. lYPl Of' aUBMI.SION: 1. DATE RECEIVED IV STATE Stele Application Identifier
8]P/lcatfon Preapp/fcatlon
Construction o Construction
.. DATE RECaVED BY FEDERAL AGEHCY Federal Identifier
o Non-COnstruction 0 Non-COnstrucllon
I. APPLICANT INP'ORMAnON
leg" Name: City of Oroanlzl!Itional Unit:
Chula Vista Community Development Department
Addr.ss (give city, county, stare, .nd zip code): Name and telephone number 01 the person to be contacted on metiers in....olving
Fourth Avenue this application (give are. codtJ)
276 Alisa Duffey Rogers
Chula Vista, CA 91910 (619) 691-5047
County of San Diego
t. ("'PLOVER IDfNnfl'ICAnON HUMBER (EINI: 7. TYPE OF APPllCAP{T: (enter approprilJle letr6r in boK) I!D
GEJ - rOO T 4 T9 8 T 811 I A. State H. Independent School Dirt
B. County I. Stale Controlled Institution of HiQher LearniOlJ
.. TYPe Of' APPLICAOON: C. Municipal J. Private University
D. Township K India" Tribe
0 New ~ Continuation o Revision E. Interstate L. Individual
0 0 F. Intermunictpal M. Profit Organization
If Rtlviaion, enter Ippropriate 5eUer(s} In oo.(es}: G. Special District N. Other (Specify):
A. Incr.... Award 8. Decrease Award C. Increase Duretion
O. Deer.a.. Duration Ot..... (._ity), t. NAME OF FEDERAL AGENCY:
HUD
10. CATALOQ OP PEDERAL DOMUl1C I 1 I 4 1.12 h 10 11. DESCRIPTIVE TIT\.E OF APPLICANTS PROJECT:
ASSIIITAHCII HUMIER:
TITlE: Rental Rehabil itati on Program Rental Rehabil itation Program
Program objective is to increase the supply
12. .."EAS AJlPECTlO IV PROJECT (cW.., countl.s, slat.s, etc.): of private ma rket rental housing for
City of Chula Vista low income tenants and rent assistance,
County of San Diego especially for large famil i es.
u. '''OPOSED PROJeCT: ,.. CONQRESSIONAL DISTRICTS OP:
Slart Oat. Ending Date a. Applicant ~ b. Project
91/10/1 92/10/1 44 44.45
15. ESTIMATI!D PUNDINQ: . 11. IS APPLICATION SUBJECT TO REVIEW BY STATE exECUTIVE ORDER 12372 PROCE$S'
.. Fed.ral . .00 a. YES. THIS PREAPPl1CATlON.'APPllCAT1ON WAS MADE AVAILABLE TO niE
37,000 STATE EXECUTIVE ORDER 12372 PROCESS FOR REVIEW ON:
b. Applicant . .00
DATE
c. Stat. S .00 l.!I
b NO. PROGRAM IS NOT COVERED BY E.O. 12372
d. locel . .00
0 OR PROGRAM HAS NOT BEEN SELECTED BY STATE FOR REVIEW
e Other . .00
f. Program Incoma . .00 17. IS THE APPLICANT DELINQUENT ON ANY FEDERAL DEBn
o TOTAL . .00 DYe. II .Yes.. attach an explllnation. [!j No
37,000
11. TO THE lEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE AND 8ELI~F. ALL DATA IN THIS APPUCATION.'PREAPPlICATION ARE TRUE AND CORRECT, 1l4E DOCUMENT HAS BEEN DULY
AUTHORlll!D BV THE QOVERNINQ BODY OF THE APPLICANT AND THE APPLICANT WILL COMPLY WITH TttE ATTACHED ASSURANCES IF THE ASSISTANCE 1$ AWARDED
._ Typed Name of Aulhorized Representlltive lb. Tit.le t T ele)hone number
Tim Nader Mayor 619 691-5047
d Signature 0' Authorized Representative e_ Date Sloned
~ - IJ..
"l'revlous""""Emrons"""'NQfUiiI)fe ~tandard ~o'm 424 IAEV -1.88;
.......... ...........-.... ...... ---- "'-'-
Prescr,bed bv OMS C."c....la. A. I 02
.
CERTIFICATIONS
The grantee shall certify that:
(1) The submission of this Program Description is authorized under State and
local law (as applicable). and the grantee possesses the legal authority
to carry out the Rental Rehabilitation Program described herein. in
accordance with 24 CFR Part 511;
(2) The grantee's Rental Rehabilitation Program was developed after
consultation with the public and its description of program
activities in the "Program Activities" section of this Program Description
has been made available to the public, in accordance with Part 511.73(c);
(3) ~ (Check if this paragraph is applicable.)
The grantee's lower income benefit standard is hereby reduced to 70 percent
as provided by 24 CFR 511.10 (a)(2). The discussion of lower income
benefit in this Program Description contains a specific explanation of the
reasons why this reduced benefit standard is necessary, which explanation
complies with 24 CFR 511.10 (a)(2).
(4) The grantee will comply with the acquisition and relocation requirements
of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies
Act of 1970, and a written Tenant Assistance Policy conforming to the
requirements of Part 511.14(a)(4) has been adopted;
(5) The grantee will conduct and administer its Rental Rehabilitation Program,
and, if applicable, ensure that State recipients conduct and administer
their Rental Rehabilitation Pro9rams in accordance with the requirements
in accordance with Subpart H - Grant Administration;
(6) The grantee will comply with the Drug-Free Workplace requirements in
accordance with 24 CFR 511.16(f); and
(7) Comply with the Certification regarding Lobbying (enclosed).
Certifying Officer
Date
J{-/3
I
J
;
,
,
!
PLACE OF PERFORMANCE
FOR CERTIFICATION REGARDING DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE REQUIREMENT
Name of Grantee: _iit[~J_~Q~~_~is~~________________________
Grant Program Name: _Y~D1~L~~b~~Uj1~u~D_~~o~r~~____________
Grant Number:
__~XJ_~~~~_Q~t~______________________________
Date:
6/7/91
The grantee shall insert in the space provided below
the site(s) expected to be used for performance of work
under the grant covered by the certification:
Place of Performance (include street address, city,
county, state, zip code for each site);
276 Fourth Avenue. Chula Vista.
San Diego County. CA 91910
20
~~-/Y
CERTIFICATION REGARDING LOBBYING
The undersigned certifies, to the best of his or her
knowledge and belief, that:
(1) No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will
be paid, by or on behalf of the undersigned, to any person
for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or
employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or
employee of Congress: or an employee of a Member of
Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal
contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of
any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative,
agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal,
amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant,
loan, or cooperative agreement.
(2) If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds
have been paid or will be paid to any person for
influencing or attempting to influence an officer or
employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or
employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of
Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant,
loan, or cooperative agreement, the undersigned shall
complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "Disclosure Form to
Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions.
(3) The undersigned shall require that the language of
this certification be included in the award documents for
all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts,
subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and
cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall
certify and disclose accordingly.
This certification is a material representation of
fact upon which reliance was placed when this transaction
was made or entered into. Submission of this certification
is a prerequisite for making or entering into this
transaction imposed by section 1352, title 31, U.S. Code.
Any person who fails to file the required certification
shall be subject to a civil penalty of not less that
$10,000 and not more than $100,000 for each such failure.
21
~{-~
RESOLUTION NO.~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
APPROVING A RENTAL REHABILITATION PROGRAM DESCRIPTION AND
RELATED DOCUMENTS AND AUTHORIZING SUBMITTAL TO THE U. S.
DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
The City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the City has been informed by the U. S.
Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) that funds
are available for the implementation of the HUD Rental
Rehabilitation Program, which program is aimed at
improvement of substandard rental units occupied by lower
income families; and,
WHEREAS, the formula allocation for the City is
$37,000.
WHEREAS, the City of Chula vista is desirous of
providing assistance for improvement of substandard rental
units occupied by lower income families; and,
WHEREAS, eligibility and application for the available
HUD funds require that a local Rental Rehabilitation Program
be designed with public input; and,
WHEREAS, a local Rental Rehabilitation Program has been
designed and a public hearing has previously been conducted
to consider that design; and,
WHEREAS, submittal documents, including a narrative
Program Description, Certifications, and a Tenant
Application Policy have been prepared and attached as
Exhibits A, B, and C, respectively, and are incorporated
herein as though fully set forth.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City council of
the city of Chula vista hereby approves the Rental
Rehabilitation Program description and related documents,
authorizes the Mayor to sign said documents as necessary,
and authorizes the city Manager to submit said documents to
HUD.
.R~.. Ip
form bt)
f-(vJ!{
d
Presented by
0L
Chrls Salomone
Community Development Director
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item~
Meeting Date 6/18/91
ITEM TITLE: a) Resolution \1J~\'t Approving the Engineer's reports for
the FY 1991-92 spread of assessments for City Open Space
Maintenance Districts I-H, 14, 15, 17, 18, 20, EastLake
Maintenance District No.1, Bay Boulevard and Town Centre,
declaring the intention to levy and collect assessments and
setting July 9, 1991 at 6:00 p.m. as the date and time for the
public hearing
Report to propose modification of Municipal Code, Section
17.07.030 to provide an additional contingency reserve
Director of Public Works~~
Director of Parks and Recreation
b)
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY: City Manager g6~' (4/5ths Vote: Yes___No~)
On April 16, 1991, City Council adopted Resolution No. 16133 directing the
City Engineer to prepare and file reports of assessments for all existing City
Open Space Mai ntenance Di stri cts. These reports have been prepared and the
above resolution approves them and sets the date for a publ ic hearing to
consider the spreading of assessments.
The report considers modification of the 1972 Act to allow the reserve to be
increased up to an additional 50% of the estimated yearly cost.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the resolution.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
Pursuant to Article 4, Chapter 1, Part 2 of Division 15 of the California
Streets and Hi ghways Code, al so known as "Landscapi ng and Light i ng Act of
1972," the City Engineer has prepared and filed the annual reports for all
existing Open Space Maintenance Districts in the City.
These reports were prepared by the City Engineer or under his direction and
are presented to Council for approval in order to proceed with the Publ ic
Hearing set for July 9, in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of
1972. The reports cover the following districts:
1. Open Space District Nos. 1 through 11, 14, 15, 17, and 18
2. Rancho del Rey Open Space District No. 20
3. EastLake Maintenance District No. 1
4. Bay Boulevard and Town Centre I Landscaping Districts
J~-I
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date 6/18/91
The Parks and Recreat i on Department conducted an i nforma 1 meet i ng for all
property owners withi n each di stri ct on Saturday, June 8. At that meeting,
staff expl ained the proposed budget and annual assessment. Several questions
and objections regarding the budget, assessments and procedures were raised at
that meeting.
The proposed assessments for Fiscal Year 1991-92 are as follows:
Table 1
FY 91-92 FY 90-91 % Increase
OSD Assessment/EDU Assessment/EDU or Decrease
1 $ 54.87 $ 47.52 +15%
2 35.90 30.58 +17%
3 357.66 383.40 -7%
4 213.80 270.74 -21%
5 260.74 344.02 -24%
6 136.44 121.56 +12%
7 98.36 (2) 106.20 -7%
8 456.02 450.92 +1%
9 96.72 81.82 +18%
10 131.48 62.22 +111%
11 86.18 40.12 +115%
14 369.38 361. 88 +2%
15 229.20 209.56 +9%
17 189.14 New
18 380.44 187.38 +103%
20 140.58 (2) 296.41 -53%
EastLake Ma i nt. Dist. 8.72 6.33 +38%
Bay Blvd. 1189.00 (1),(2) 1,339.20 -11%
Town Centre 51. 98 (I) 43.40 +20%
(I) Per benefit unit
(2) As proposed, reserve exceeds 50%
Open Space Districts 1, 2, 6, 8, 9, 14, 15 and Town Centre had low to moderate
increases in thei r assessments due to increased contract costs, increased
reserve requirements in accordance with Section 17.07.030 of the Code or as a
result of a lower previous year's rates. The lower rate is a result of
adjust i ng the assessment to reduce the estimated reserve to the current 50%
requi rement. The percent change is especi ally apparent where the previ ous
year's balance was at 75-80% of the estimated cost and the current year
contract costs increase. This was the case in District 18 and to a lesser
extent in Districts 2, 6, 9, 10, 11, 15, and Town Centre.
Di stri ct 10 had a very 1 arge increase due to the ant i ci pated i ncl us i on of
additional open space associated with Ladera Villas. This open space has a
high estimated cost for maintenance.
J./p - r:J.
Page 3, Item
Meeting Date 6/18/91
Di stri ct 11 increase can be attri buted to a reduction in assessed properties
as a result of a re-subdivision of a condominium. There was a reduction of 40
units in that district as a result of the re-mapping. District II's contract
costs also increased.
Districts 3, 4, 5, and 7 had decreases in supplemental improvements or utility
costs which resulted in this year's assessments being lower than last year's.
It is proposed for District 7, 20, and Bay Boulevard that the fund balance in
excess of 50% reserve be 1 eft in the account to be used in future years as
needed and help level the assessment. Should Council elect not to modify the
ordi nance to allow more than 50% reserve, the assessments woul d be reduced.
Staff has anticipated the following year's costs and levied assessments this
year which should be close to following years.
District 20 had a substantial decrease in the assessment over last year. This
occurred because the actual mai ntenance contract came in substantially lower
than what was estimated by the developer's landscape architect.
Staff recommends modifying the City Code, Chapter 17.07.030 which deals with
the Reserve Operating Fund for Open Space Districts. Our current Code allows
the City to maintain an additional contingency reserve of 50% of the next
year's operating budget to provide necessary cash flow for operations for the
first six months of each fiscal year. Staff recommends modification of this
provision to allow the City to maintain a reserve not to exceed 100% to
provide cash flow or a reserve balance which can be used in the future years.
Under the current Code, the City is required to return any excess fund balance
above the 50% reserve. Thi s results in a lower assessment than what woul d
occur if the balance at the end of the year is at or 1 ess than 50% result i ng
in assessments fl uctuat i ng year after year. A reserve balance coul d be used
to help reduce the impact of additional improvements or to help balance the
"peak and valley" effect that has been typical of our assessments.
Staff at the July 9, 1991 meeting wi 11 present the ordi nance as an urgency
ordinance. The Engineer's reports for Open Space District Nos. 7, 20, and Bay
Boul evard will need to be revi sed if the emergency ordi nance modifi cat ion is
not adopted in order to return all amounts in excess of the current 50%
1 imitation.
FISCAL IMPACT: None.
DOS/File: OS-DOl
WPC 5647E
:2' -.3
RESOLUTION NO.~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE ENGINEER'S REPORTS
FOR THE FY 1991-92 SPREAD OF ASSESSMENTS FOR
CITY OPEN SPACE MAINTENANCE DISTRICTS 1-11,
14, 15, 17, 18, 20, EASTLAKE MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO.1, BAY BOULEVARD AND TOWN CENTRE,
DECLARING THE INTENTION TO LEVY AND COLLECT
ASSESSMENTS AND SETTING JULY 9, 1991 AT 6: 00
p.m. AS THE DATE AND TIME FOR THE PUBLIC
HEARING
The City Council of the City of chula vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
Division
known as
Engineer
existing
WHEREAS, pursuant to Article 4, Chapter 1, Part
15 of the California Streets and Highways Code,
"Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972," the
has prepared and filed the annual reports for
Open Space Maintenance Districts in the City; and
2 of
also
City
all
WHEREAS, these reports were prepared by the Ci ty
Engineer or under his direction and are presented to Council for
approval in order to proceed with the Public Hearing set for July
9, in accordance with the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972.
The reports cover the following districts:
1. Open Space District Nos. 1 through 11, 14, 15, 17, and 18
2. Rancho del Rey Open Space District NO. 20
3. EastLake Maintenance District No.1
4. Bay Boulevard and Town Centre I Landscaping Districts
WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Department conducted
an informal meeting for all property owners within each district
on Saturday, June 8 at which time staff explained the proposed
budget and annual assessment; and
WHEREAS, the proposed assessments for Fiscal Year
1991-92 are as follows:
Table 1
OSD
FY 91-92
Assessment/EDU
FY 90-91% Increase
Assessment/EDU or Decrease
1
2
3
4
5
$ 54.87
35.90
357.66
213.80
260.74
$ 47.52
30.58
383.40
270.74
344.02
+15%
+17%
-7%
-21%
-24%
ttJ., -1-
-1-
6 136.44 121.56 +12%
7 98.36 (2 ) 106.20 -7%
8 456.02 450.92 +1%
9 96.72 81.82 +18%
10 131.48 62.22 +111%
11 86.18 40.12 +39%
14 369.38 361.88 +2%
15 229.20 209.56 +9%
17 189.14 New
18 380.44 187.38 +103%
20 140.58 (2 ) 296.41 -53%
EastLake Maint. Dist. 8.72 6.33 +38%
Bay Blvd. 1189.00 (1) , (2) 1,339.20 -11%
Town Centre 51.98 (1) 43.40 +20%
(1) Per benefit unit
(2 ) As proposed, reserve exceeds 50%
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chu1a Vista does hereby approve the Engineer's
reports for the FY 1991-92 spread of assessments for City Open
Space Maintenance Distr icts 1-11, 14, 15, 17, 18, 20, EastLake
Maintenance District No.1, Bay Boulevard and Town centre,
declare its intention to levy and collect assessments.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby
set July 9, 1991 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, City of
Chu1a Vista, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chu1a Vista, California as the
date and time for the public hearings on said assessments.
as t
orm by
Presented by
~
~
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
8962a
Boogaard C ty Attorney
~'-s
-2-
~'1f''''ars RtpJ# fDr
'RAntJaD ~( R~
Ope>> sfJ4'L Marn~
Di r-m'l:f 2()
,'" 1- 1'1'12-
Rutew'A-{
JS5lJEROME\04176.RPlVune 13,1991
ENGINEER'S REPORT
01' -J,
RENEWAL
RANCHO DEL REY OPEN SPACE
MAINTENANCE DISTRlCT No. 20
FISCAL YEAR 1991-1992
City of Chu1a Vista
Prepared by:
Willdan Associates
6363 Greenwich Drive, Suite 250
San Diego, CA 92122-3939
(619) 457-1199
IN:04176:js
TABLE OF CONTENTS
~
Report Pursuant to "Landscaping & Lighting Act of 1972" and the Chula Vista
Municipal Code, Chapter 17.07 and 17.08 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 3
Boundaries of District and Diagram ............................. 4
Maintenance Items . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 13
Cost Estimate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ., 16
Method of Apportionment ................................... 17
Description of Zones ...................................... 20
Exhibit A * - Resolution Ordering Report Preparation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 26
Exhibit B* - Assessment Roll ................................ 27
*Exhibits A & B are on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista
JS5VEROME\04176.RP1VlIne 13,1991
.:2 ~ -.::r
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
RANCHO DEL REY OPEN SPACE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
FISCAL YEAR 1991-1992
REPORT PuRSUANT TO "LANDSCAPING & LIGHTING ACT OF 1972"
AND THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE. CHAPTER 17.07 AND 17.08
Pursuant to Resolution of the City Council (dated , 1991),
submitted herewith is the "Report", consisting of the following documents, pursuant to the
provisions of Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of
California, being the "Landscape & Lighting Act of 1972", commencing with Section
22500 and the Chula Vista Municipal Code, Chapter 17.07 and 17.08. This "Report" is
applicable for the ensuing twelve month period, being the fiscal year commencing July I,
1991 to June 30, 1992, and contains:
I. A DIAGRAM of the Open Space Maintenance District. Said Diagram shows the
exterior boundaries of the District, the boundaries of the zones within the District and
identifies each parcel by a distinctive number. The property lines and dimensions of
each lot or parcel by a distinctive number. The property lines and dimensions of
each lot or parcel of land within the District is shown in detail on the County of San
Diego Assessor's maps, on file in the County Assessor's Office, 1600 Pacific
Highway, Room 103, San Diego, California.
2. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS of the improvements to be maintained and/or improved
for the fiscal year and subsequent fiscal years as applicable. The plans and
specifications show and describe the existing improvements, and are sufficient in
showing and describing the general nature, location and extent of the improvements.
3. AN ESTIMATE OF THE COSTS of the improvements to be maintained and/or
constructed for the mentioned fiscal year.
4. AN ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE showing the proportionate amount of the assessment to
be charged in proportion to the benefits to be received by each lot or parcel as shown
on the above referenced Diagram.
All lots and parcels of land known as public' property, as defined under Section 22663
of said "Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972", have been omitted and are exempt
from any assessment under these proceedings.
Executed this
day of
, 1991, at Chula Vista, California.
CITY ENGINEER
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
JS5LTEROMEI04176.RPnIune 13, 1991
I
~, -g
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Final approval, confirmation and levy of the annual assessment and all matters in the
Engineer's "Report" was made on the day of , 1991, by
adoption of Resolution No. by the City Council.
CiTY CLERK
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
JS5tJEROMEI04J76.RPTVune 13. 1991
2
;J~-e:;
INTRODUCTION
Pursuant to the order to the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, this report is prepared
in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter I, Landscape & Lighting Act
of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California,
and the Chula Vista Municipal Code, Chapter 17.07 and 17.08.
This report presents the engineering analysis for the 1991-1992 Fiscal Year for the district
known as:
Rancho Del Rey Open Space Maintenance District
City of Chula Vista, California
(hereinafter referred to as "District").
This District by direct benefit assessments, provides funding for the maintenance of
landscaped street medians, landscaped parkways and supplemental street lighting within
public rights-of-way or dedicated maintenance easements, slope maintenance and channel
(f100dway) maintenance in the Rancho Del Rey development.
Section 22573, Landscape & Lighting Act of 1972, requires assessments to be levied
according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. The section states:
"The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may
be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net
amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated
benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements. "
The 1972 Act also provides for the classification of various areas within an assessment
district into different zones where,
".. .by reason of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improve-
ments, the various areas will receive differing degrees of benefit from the
improvements. A zone shall consist of all territory which will receive
substantially the same degree of benefit from the improvements. An assessment
district may consist of contiguous or noncontiguous areas. "
As the assessments are levied on the basis of benefit, they are considered a user's fee, not
a tax, and therefore are not governed by Article XIIlA. Properties owned by public
agencies, such as a city, county, or state, or the federal government, are not assessable
without the approval of the particular agency and, normally, are not assessed.
JS5VEROME\04176.RPTVune 13,1991
3
J (, - /0
BOUNDARIES OF DISTRICT AND DIAGRAM
The boundary of the District is completely within the city limits of the City of Chula Vista
and is shown on the Assessment Diagram (on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City
of Chula Vista and referred to as Exhibit A). A reduced copy of Exhibit A is included in
this report. The boundary includes the areas commonly known as Rancho Del Rey SPA
I, SPA II, and SPA Ill. As permitted in the Landscape and Lighting Act of 1972 (Section
22571), the details of the individual parcels and lots (i.e. their lines, dimensions, and
bearings) are shown on the County Assessor's Maps for these properties, on file in the San
Diego County Assessor's Office, 1600 Pacific Highway, Room 103, San Diego, California.
JS5\JEROMEI04176.RPTVune 13. 1991
4
J' -II
Diagram - Eastlake Maintenance District No. 1
Refer to Exhibit A for a reduced copy of the Assessment. Full size diagram is on file in
the office of the City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista.
JS5\JEROMEI04176.RP1\June 13,1991
5
;), -/~
RANCHO DEL REY OPEN SPACE"
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 20
ZONE 1
DESILTlNG BASIN
:J. ~ - 1.3
RANCHO DEL REY OPEN SPACE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 20
r
.'--''''-'' ,-
. ,rJ ..-......
~\
ZONE 2
RICE CANYON LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE
;;, -1'1
RANCHO DEL REY OPEN SPACE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 20
,
('
~
l.
c-
,rJ~ '-...--.,:--
ZONE 3
EAST "H" STREET
;J ~ -/5
RANCHO DEL REY OPEN SPACE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 20
,
('
~
. ~
~
. /-1.-....----...........:-
ZONE 4
SPA !-PHASE I
EMPLOYMENT PARK
:2 ~ -Ih
RANCHO DEL REY OPEN SPACE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 20
,
('
~
,
"Jr'
~
~
'--'--
.,-_J -..:
',\
ZONE 5
SPA I,PHASES 2-6
RESIDENl1AL
~lI-l?-
RANCHO DEL REV OPEN SPACE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 20
ZONE 6
SPA II
~f6 - Ig
RANCHO DEL REY OPEN SPACE
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 20
.
('
~
,.
.~.
ZONE 7
SPA 11/
C2 ~ -I'
MAINTENANCE ITEMS
I. Definitions
A. "Maintain" or "maintenance" means the furnishing of services and materials for
the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improve-
ment, including:
I. Repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement.
2. Providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping,
including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or
treating for disease or injury.
3. The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste.
4. Providing administration for the maintenance of improvements.
5. Maintenance will be provided as set forth by area description below and
as noted on the approved Landscape Plans for the Rancho Del Rey
planned community:
.. Area No. I - Areas containing permanent irrigation systems planted
in ground cover, shrubs and trees shall be kept weed free as
required by City Parks and Recreation Director. Any area not fully
covered with planned ground covers are to be replanted and grown
to fully cover area during the normal growing season.
.. Area No. 2 - Lawn area with automatic irrigation systems.
Weeding shall be as necessary to create a well manicured appear-
ance.
.. Area No.3 - Areas containing permanent irrigation systems initially
planted with hydroseed mix and shrubs and trees shall be kept weed
free as required by Parks and Recreation Director. The intent is to
maintain healthy vegetation for hill holding.
.. Area No. 4 - Areas containing permanent or temporary irrigation
systems in natural open space lands and slopes with indigenous
plant growth. Weed abatement in these areas as directed by Parks
and Recreation Director, not to exceed two times per year, may
consist of cutting back to 6" high.
.. Area No.5 - Two times per year, areas of non-irrigated open space
shall be cleaned of debris including but not limited to the follow-
JS5VEROMEI04176.RPTVune 13, 1991
13
;2(, -~O
ing: bottles, cans, paper, cardboard, or metallic items and noxious
plant materials such as tumbleweeds.
II. Description of Items for Maintenance
The facilities and items of maintenance included within the District by rone
designation are as follows:
Zone I. Maintain the drainage system within Rice Canyon including the mainte-
nance of the drop structures and desilting basin.
Zone 2. Maintain landscaping, and irrigation system areas associated with the Rice
Canyon Open Space area as noted. Area 4 and 5 category maintenance
will be provided to the canyon area to continue the natural landscape
scheme. The parking area, so noted on the approved landscape plans,
will be maintained to area 1 and 2 categories.
Zone 3. Maintain landscaping and irrigation system improvements in the designat-
ed public street areas of East "H" Street generally fronting the Rancho
Del Rey subdivision.
Zone 4. Maintain landscaping and irrigation system improvements in designated
open space easements adjacent to streets in the Rancho Del Rey Business
Park, SPA I, Phase I. Area 1, 3, and 5 category maintenance, monu-
mentation maintenance and replacement cost will be provided.
Zone 5. SPA 1, Phases 2 - 6 landscape improvements, as noted on the approved
landscape plans, will be maintained to Area 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 categories.
Walls and fencing will also be maintained. Open space easements and
within the public right-of-way of Otay Lakes Road will also be main-
tained as per approved plans.
Zone 6. SPA II landscape improvements are to be incorporated into the mainte-
nance District at such time when the improvements are installed and
maintenance is turned over to the City of Chula Vista.
Zone 7. SPA III and those portions of SPA I south of East "H" Street landscape
improvements, are to be incorporated into the maintenance District at
such time when the improvements are installed and maintenance is turned
over to the City of Chula Vista. Included within the SPA III improve-
ments will be the maintenance of the open space easements and areas
within the public right-of-way of Telegraph Canyon Road, which abut
SPA III.
JS5VEROME\04176.RPTVune 13, 1991
14
~ ~ -ill
SUBDIVISION OF ZONES
As part of this district, zones have been established for properties to be
developed after the adoption of this report. The City of Chula Vista, at
its option, will subdivide existing zones or consolidate existing zones
based on the benefit of those facilities established after the adoption of
this district.
COMMUNITY AND NEIGHBORHOOD PARKS
The 20 acre portion of the Community Park in natural states and slopes
shall be maintained by the District. The remaining 14 acre portion of the
community park used as an active recreational area shall be maintained
at the expense of the City.
JS5VEROMEI04176.RPT\June 13,1991
15
~" -~;l.
COST ESTIMATE
The total estimated budget necessary for the maintenance of SPA I, Phases 1-4, Rice
Canyon Desilting Basin and Landscaping and East "H" Street for the 1991-1992 fiscal year
is as follows:
Item
Zone I
Zone 2
Zone 3
Zone 4
Zone 6
Zone 7
Cost Per Year
Desilting Basin
Rice Canyon
East "R" Street
SPA I, Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
Phase 4
Phase 5
Phase 6
$ 33,847
o
21,684
92,050
52,200
101,367
54,449
o
o
o
o
1990-1991 Maintenance Total: $355,597
SPA II
SPA III
JS5VEROMEI04176.RPToJune 13,1991
16
~~-:B
METHOD OF ApPORTIONMENT
A. Benefit Charge Formula. Zone I Rice Canyon Desiltine Drainage Basin
Zone 1, the Rice Canyon Desilting Drainage Basin benefits properties differently and
as such is to be spread to those properties draining into the basin based on a runoff
coefficient which is in turn converted to an EDU factor.
Runoff Coefficients and EDU's for Drainaee
Land Use
Single Family Detached
Runoff
Density
0-2
2-4
4-6
6-8
8-10
10-12
12-20
20+
Single Family Attached
Multi-Family
Employment Park
Commercial
Church/School
Coefficient
.6
.6
.6
.6
.6
.7
.7
.8
.9
.8
.7
EDU
1.00
.33
.20
.14
.11
.10
.07
.05
1. SO/acre
1. 33/acre
1.17/acre
Source:
Final Engineer's Report, City of Chula Vista Assessment District 87-1,
East "R" Street
EDU's associated with drainage are applied to those parcels which drain into the Rice
Canyon area, both south and north of "R" Street. The total number of EDU's are
then summed and the total cost is apportioned back to the participating properties.
B. Benefit Charl;e Formula. Zone 2 Rice Canyon Landscape Maintenance
Rice Canyon also provides an open space and recreation amenity to the residents and
occupants of the employment park. As such, and EDU factor based on recreational
use is established below and uses as a base a standard population factor for a
residential household of 2.67. This factor is then related to the population per acre
of non-residential land uses based on numbers derived from San Diego Traffic
Generators, July 1988, SANDAG/CALTRANS. The factors and associated land uses
are presented below.
JS5VEROMEI04176.RPTVune 13. 1991
17
~t, -~lf
Recreation Population Factor
Land Use
Residential
Commercial
Business Park
PODulation
2. 67/DU
IS/acre
40/ acre
EDU Factor
I
5.62
14.99
EDU's associated with recreation are applied to those parcels which benefit from the
recreation value of Rice Canyon, properties north of "H" Street. The total number
of EDU's are then summed and the total cost is apportioned back to the participating
properties.
C. Benefit Char~e Formula. Zones 3-5 SPA I. Phases 1-6
The amount of the estimated assessment on each lot or parcel of land in the District
is in proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel of
land from the use of the road network in and around the Rancho Del Rey develop-
ment. One method of apportioning the costs of the landscape maintenance is to
calculate the estimated traffic generated by a parcel of property within the district.
A standard established within San Diego County is the average daily traffic (ADT)
generation factors published by SANDAG. An ADT factor has been assigned to each
land use type and these factors are used to estimate the traffic generated by that land
use type. To compare traffic generation across different land types, ADT's are
converted to Equivalent Dwelling Unit (EDU) Benefit Factors with a single family
detached unit having a base EDU of I. All other land uses are factored upon the
base factor of 1 as noted below. An ADT factor was used to spread the cost of
Zones 3-7.
ADT factors used to calculate benefit units are as follows:
Land Use
Single Family Detached
Single Family Attached
Multi-Family
Employment Park
Commercial
Church
Density
0-10
10-20
20+
Benefit
(EDm Factor*
1.0
0.8
0.6
30.0 per acre
40.0 per acre
4.0 per acre
*Source: Rancho Del Rey SPA Plan
JS5lJEROMEI04176.RPnIune 13, 1991
18
~ (, -.;)~
D. Benefit Charge Formula. Zones 6 & 7 SPA II & SPA III
A benefit charge formula for Zones 6 & 7 will be established at such time costs for
facilities within these two zones are established, subject to any charges associated
with the geographic configuration of the zones.
JS5VEROME\04176.RPTVune 13,1991
19
;; (p -~"
DESCRWfION OF ZONES
The District contains seven zones with the following designations:
Desilting Basin
Rice Canyon
East "H" Street
SPA 1, Phase 1
SPA 1, Phases 2 - 6
SPA II
SPA III
Zone 1
Zone 2
Zone 3
Zone 4
Zone 5
Zone 6
Zone 7
SPA I has been planned and the phases listed will apply as the designated zones for that
area. SPA II and SPA III have yet to have the areas mapped>for final designation. These
areas, SPA II and SPA III, will be subdivided accordingly in subsequent years of the
District and zones will be designated at that time.
Table one, which follows, outlines the cost by zone for the fiscal year 1991-1992, and also
presents the cost per EDD for each zone. These costs are then multiplied by the number
of EDD's participating in each zone (Table 2) to obtain the total cost allocated to each
parcel by zone (Table 3).
lS5lJEROME104176.RPTLhme 13, 1991
20
~ ~ -~ T-
lS5VEROMEI04176.RP11June 13, 1991
Tab]e ]
Maintenance Cost and EDU's
2]
;? ~ -d f/
RANCHO DEL REV LANDSCAPE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
RESIDENTIAL
MAINTENANCE COST BY ZONE COST PER EDU COST PER UNIT TYPE
SFD 0-2 SFO 2-4 SFD 4-6 SFO 6-8 SFO 8-10 SFA 10-12 SFA 12-20 .MF20+
Zone 1 DESIL TING BASIN $33,847 $30.93 $30.93 $10.21 $6.19 $4.33 $3.40 $3.09 $2.16 $1.55
Zone 2 RICE CANYON 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 SO.OO SO.OO $0.00 SO.OO $0.00 SO.OO
Zone 3 EAST ~ W STREET 21,684 $3.22 $3.22 S3.22 $3.22 S3.22 $3.22 $2.58 $2.58 $1.93
1" Zone 4 SPA I, PHASE 1 92,050 $36.37 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
Zone 5 SPA I, RESIDENTIAL
~ PHASE 2 52,200
I PHASE 3 101,367
L PHASE 4 54,449
PHASE 5 0
-..&\ PHASE 6 0
TOTAL SPA I, RESIDENTIAL 208,016 $106.43 $106.43 $106.43 $106.43 $106.43 $106.43 $85.14 S85.14 $63.86
Zone 6 SPAll 0 $0.00
Zone 7 SPA II 0 SO.OO
TOTAL MAINTENANCE COST $355,597
JS5VEROME\04176.RPnJune 13, 1991
Table 2
Participating EDU's by Zone
23
d' -30
CL
~
,
~
PARTICIPATING EDU'S BY ZONE
Zone 1 Zone 2 Zone 4 ------- -------- Zone 5 ------ ------ Zone 6 Zone 7
DESILTIN RICE SPA I SPA I SPA I SPA I SPA I SPA I SPA II SPA III
BASIN CANYON PHASE 1 PHASE 2 PHASE 3 PHASE 4 HASE HASE 6
-------- -------- -------- ------- -------- ------- ------ ------ ------ -----
1094.4 5271.6 2530.6 728.0 410.0 189.0 319.5 308.0 839.0 1413.0
Table 3
1991 - 1992 Cost per Parcel by Zone
(on file, Office of the City Engineer)
JS5VEROMEI04176.RPTLlune 13, 1991
25
~'-3~
Exhibit A - Resolution Ordering Report Preparation
(on file, Office of the City Engineer)
JS5IJEROME\04176.RP71Iune 13. 199]
26
~ (p - 33
En9inurs Repor4- toy
e()Sl-~
Op!n ~ Marnfe~~
])frlrt::J-
/qq /-/'1&12-
f<eNwILL
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
EASTLAKE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT No. I
FISCAL YEAR 1991-1992
RENEWAL
Prepared by:
WILLDAN ASSOCIATES
6363 Greenwich Drive, Suite 250
San Diego, CA. 92122
(619) 457-1199
IN:04177:js
JS5'JEROMEI04177.RP1Vune J3, 1991
~~-3~
Table of Contents
~
Report Pursuant to "Landscaping & Lighting Act of 1972"
.............. .
1
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 3
Boundaries of District and Diagram ............................. 4
Maintenance Items (plans & Specifications ......................... 6
Estimate of Cost . . . . . . . .
................................ .
9
Method of Apportionment ..
................ ....
. . . . . . .. 10
Assessment Schedule .....
. . . . . . .. 11
Exhibit A * - Assessment Diagram ....
......... .... .
. . . . . . .. 12
Exhibit B* - Assessment Roll ....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 13
Sorted by Assessor Parcel Number .......................... 13
*Exhibits A and B are on file in the Office of the City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista
JS5IJEROMEI04177.RPTV14ne 13, 1991
)"-3.5
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
EASTLAKE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.1
FISCAL YEAR 1991 - 1992
REpORT PURSUANT TO "LANDSCAPING & LIGHTING ACT OF 1972"
Pursuant to Resolution of the City Council (dated ,
1991), submitted herewith is the "Report", consisting of the following documents, pursuant
to the provisions of Division 15, Part 2 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of
California, being the "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", commencing with Section
22500. This "Report" is applicable for the ensuing twelve month period, being the ~
year commencing July I, 1991 to June 30, 1992, and contains:
1. A DIAGRAM of the Maintenance District. Said Diagram shows the exterior
boundaries of the District, the boundaries of the zones within the District and
identifies each parcel by a distinctive number. The property lines and dimensions of
each lot or parcel of land within the District is shown in detail on the County of San
Diego Assessor's maps, on file in the County Assessor's Office, 1600 Pacific
Highway, Room 103, San Diego, California.
2. PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS of the improvements to be maintained and! or improved
for the fiscal year. The plans and specifications show and describe the existing
improvements, and are sufficient in showing and describing the general nature,
location and extent of the improvements.
3. AN ESTIMATE OF THE COSTS of the improvements to be maintained and! or
constructed for the mentioned fiscal year.
4. AN ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE showing the proportionate amount of the assessment to
be charged in proportion to the benefits to be received by each lot or parcel as shown
on the above-referenced Diagram.
All lots and parcels of land known as public property, as defined under Section 22663
of said "Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972", have been omitted and are exempt
from any assessment under these proceedings.
Executed this
day of
, 1991, at Chula Vista, California.
CITY ENGINEER
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
JSmEROMEI04177.RP7Vune 13, 1991
1
;J~-3f,
Final approval, confirmation and levy of the annual assessment and all matters in the
Engineer's "Report" was made on the _ day of , 1991, by adoption
of Resolution No. by the City Council.
CITY CLERK
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
lS5VEROMEI04177.RPTVune 13, 1991
2
J,-3r
INTRODUCTION
Pursuant to the order to the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, this report is prepared
in compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Landscaping and Lighting Act
of 1972, Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California.
This report presents the engineering analysis for the 1991-1992 Fiscal Year for the district
known as:
EastLake Maintenance District No. 1
City of Chula Vista, California
(hereinafter referred to as "District").
This District by direct benefit assessments, provides funding for the maintenance of
landscaped street medians, landscaped parkways and supplemental street lighting within
public right-of-ways or dedicated maintenance easements in the EastLake development.
Section 22573, Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972, requires assessments to be levied
according to benefit rather than according to assessed value. The section states:
"The net amount to be assessed upon lands within an assessment district may
be apportioned by any formula or method which fairly distributes the net
amount among all assessable lots or parcels in proportion to the estimated
benefits to be received by each such lot or parcel from the improvements.
The 1972 Act also provides for the classification of various areas within an assessment
district into different zones where,
".. .by reason of variations in the nature, location, and extent of the improve-
ments, the various areas will receive differing degrees of benefit from the
improvements. A zone shall consist of all territory which will receive
substantially the same degree of benefit from the improvements. An assessment
district may consist of contiguous or noncontiguous areas."
As the assessments are levied on the basis of benefit, they are considered a user's fee, not
a tax, and, therefore, are not governed by Article XIIlA.
Properties owned by public agencies, such as a city, county, state, or the federal
government, are not assessable without the approval of the particular agency and, normally,
are not assessed.
JS5'JEROMEI04177.RPT\June 13, 1991
3
;)"-31
BOUNDARIES OF DISTRICT AND DIAGRAM
The boundary of the District is completely within the city limits of the City of Chula Vista
and is shown on the Assessment Diagram (on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City
of Chula Vista and referred to as Exhibit A). The boundary includes the areas commonly
known as EastLake Hills, Shores, Village Center and Business Center, as well as the
EastLake Greens and the U.S. Olympic Training Center. As permitted in the Landscape
and Lighting Act of 1972 (Section 22571), the details of the individual parcels and lots (i.e.
their lines, dimensions, and bearings) are shown on the County Assessor's Maps for these
properties, on file in the San Diego County Assessor's Office, 1600 Pacific Highway,
Room 103, San Diego, California.
JS5\JEROME\04177.RP1Vune 13, 1991
4
,,;)t, - 3'
DIAGRAM
EastLake Maintenance District No. I
Full size diagram is on file in the office of
the City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista
JS5VEROME104177.RPnJune 13, 1991
5
;J ~ - ~O
MAINTENANCE ITEMS (PLANS & SPECIFICATIONS
I. Definitions
A. "Maintain" or "maintenance" means the furnishing of services and materials for
the ordinary and usual maintenance, operation, and servicing of any improve-
ment, including:
1. Repair, removal, or replacement of all or any part of any improvement.
2. Providing for the life, growth, health, and beauty of landscaping,
including cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, or
treating for disease or injury.
3. The removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris, and other solid waste.
4. Providing administration for the maintenance of improvements.
B. "Improvement" means one or any combination of the following:
1. The installation or planting of landscaping.
2. The installation or construction of statuary, fountains, and other ornamen-
tal structures and facilities.
3. The installation or construction of supplemental public lighting facilities.
4. The installation or construction of any facilities which are appurtenant to
any of the foregoing or which are necessary or convenient for the
maintenance or servicing thereof, including grading, clearing, removal of
debris, the installation or construction of curbs, gutters, walls, sidewalks,
or paving, or water, irrigation, drainage, or electrical facilities.
5. The maintenance or servicing, or both, of any of the foregoing.
II. Description of Items
The facilities and items of maintenance included within the District are as follows:
A. Maintain landscaping and irrigation system improvements in designated public
street median areas. Designated streets where median maintenance will be
required include:
. Otay Lakes Road
. EastLake Parkway
. East "H" Street
. EastLake Drive
. Hunte Parkway
Rutgers Ave. east to 500 feet east of Salt
Creek
SR-125 to Orange Avenue
5,000 feet southwest of SR-125 to 3,000
feet northeast of SR -125
EastLake I Hills and Shores
Otay Lakes Road to Orange Avenue
JS5'JEROMEI04177.RP11June 13. 1991
6
Jf, - tf/
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Orange Avenue
Eastlake Parkway
Clubhouse Drive
Greengate Drive
Greenview Drive
Masters Ridge Road"
Silverado
Golfcrest Drive
Eastlake Parkway to Wueste Road
within "Greens" SPA Boundary
within "Greens" SPA Boundary
within "Greens" SPA Boundary
within "Greens" SPA Boundary
within "Greens" SPA Boundary
within "Greens" SPA Boundary
within "Greens" SPA Boundary
1. Maintain landscaping including grass, ground cover, shrubs, trees, and
other ornamental vegetation improvements in designated public street
median areas.
2. Maintain irrigation water supply and sprinkler system improvements in
designated public street median areas. Maintenance to include necessary
repairs to the water supply and sprinkler system.
B. Maintain landscaping and irrigation system improvements in designated
maintenance easements adjacent to streets. Designated streets where there may
be maintenance easements include:
.
SR-125 Corridor
5,000 feet south of Otay Lakes Road to
1,800 feet north of East "H" Street. This
maintenance easement is temporary and in-
cludes the area set aside for the SR-125
right-of-way until such time that Caltrans
accepts maintenance on this area
5,000 feet southwest of SR-125 to 3,000
feet northeast of SR-125
SR-125 to Otay Lakes Road
Rutgers Road east EastLake Parkway to
3,200 feet east of Lane Avenue
EastLake Parkway to 500 feet west of Lane
Avenue
Otay Lakes Road to 350 feet north of
Boswell Road
EastLake Parkway to 500 feet north of
Boswell Road
East "H" Street to 600 feet east of Lane
Avenue
Hillside Drive to Lakeshore Drive and
Lakeshore Drive to SR-125
EastLake Hills
EastLake Shores
Otay Lakes Road to Orange Avenue
Eastlake Parkway to Wueste Road
within "Greens" SPA Boundary
within "Greens" SPA Boundary
within "Greens" SPA Boundary
. East "H" Street
. EastLake Parkway
. Otay Lakes Road
. Fenton Street
. Lane Avenue
. Miller Drive
. Boswell Road
. EastLake Drive
. Hillside Drive
. Lakeshore Drive
. Hunte Parkway
. Orange Avenue
. Eastlake Parkway
. Greengate Drive
. Greenview Drive
"
Does not include irrigation.
JS5VEROMEI04177.RP1Vune 13.1991
7
i)(, - '1~
.
.
.
.
.
Clubhouse Drive
Masters Ridge Road
Golfcrest Road
Silverado
Golf Course
within "Greens" SPA Boundary
within "Greens" SPA Boundary
within "Greens" SPA Boundary
within "Greens" SPA Boundary
within "Greens" SPA Boundary Vista Drive
1. Maintain landscaping including grass, ground cover, shrubs, trees, and
other ornamental vegetation in maintenance easements adjacent to
designated streets.
2. Maintain irrigation water supply and sprinkler system improvements in
maintenance easements. Maintenance to include necessary repairs to the
water supply and sprinkler system.
C. Maintain supplemental lighting improvements and provide for additional costs
associated with operating supplemental lighting. Maintenance will include
necessary repair and replacement of fixtures, luminaries, bulbs, and appurte-
nances. Designated streets where there may be supplemental lighting include:
.
East "H" Street
5,000 feet southwest of SR-125 to 3,000
feet northeast of SR-125
SR-125 to Orange Avenue
Rutgers Road east to 3,200 feet east of
Lane Avenue
Otay Lakes Road to Orange Avenue
Eastlake Parkway to Wueste Road
within "Greens" SPA Boundary
within "Greens" SPA Boundary
within "Greens" SPA Boundary
within "Greens" SPA Boundary
within "Greens" SPA Boundary
within "Greens" SPA Boundary
within "Greens" SPA Boundary
within "Greens" SPA Boundary Vista Drive
D. Maintain proposed open space lots. Maintenance will conform to approved
landscape plans for subject area. Area will include:
. dedicated open space lots owned in fee by the City of Chu1a Vista,
including slopes adjacent to SR 125, the community park site and High
School Site, all within the "Greens" SPA Boundary.
.
.
EastLake Parkway
Otay Lakes Road
Hunte Parkway
Orange Avenue
Eastlake Parkway
Greengate Drive
Greenview Drive
Clubhouse Drive
Masters Ridge Road
Golfcrest Road
Silverado
Golf Course
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
JS5IJEROMEI04177.RPT1June 13.1991
8
d~-~3
EsTIMATE OF COST
Eastlake Maintenance District No.1
Contractual Services
City Staff Services
Utilities
Landscape Supplies
Professional Services
Supplemental Improvements
Additional Medians
Total Estimated Cost
Reserve Requirement (50%)
TOTAL
LESS Balance Available from
Previous Fiscal Year
NET ASSESSMENT
JS5'JEROMEI04177.RPIVune 14.1991
35,360
6,750
20,480
500
8,600
650
20.870
93,210
46.605
139,815
(59.432)
80,383
9
:J('-~~
METHOD OF ApPORTIONMENT
Benefit Charge Formula
The amount of the estimated assessment on each lot or parcel of land in the District is in
proportion to the estimated benefit to be received by each such lot or parcel of land from
the use of the streets and their appurtenances, such as supplemental street lights. The use
or benefit of a street is determined by the use of the land served by such streets. Each lot
or parcel of land in the District was determined to have a specific actual land use in
accordance with the Sectional Planning Area (SPA) Plan covering such parcel. Each type
of actual land use was assigned a trip generation factor derived from trip generation rates
by land use as they relate to a single family residential land use. The trip generation rates
by land use were developed by SANDAG and are contained in the "Brief Guide of
Vehicular Traffic Generation Rates for the San Diego Region" manual.
The land use factor is multiplied by the number of dwelling units if the land use is
residential, or the number of acres for other land uses. The product of this multiplication
is the number of benefit units for each lot or parcel of land to be assessed. The sum of all
the benefit units for each of the lots or parcels of land to be assessed in each zone is
divided into the total amounts to be generated by assessments to arrive at the amount of
each benefit unit. The amount of the benefit unit is then multiplied by the number of
benefit units for each of the lots and parcels of land to establish the benefit charge for a
particular lot or parcel of land.
Description of Zones
The District contains two zones with the following designations: Zone A contains the
property within the approved EastLake I SPA known as EastLake Business Center,
EastLake Village Center, EastLake Hills, and EastLake Shores. Final maps have been filed
on these properties. All the assessments for this fiscal year are being spread among the
parcels in Zone A.
Zone B contains the land within the District commonly referred to as the "Greens". No
assessments will be levied in Zone B until such time as a supplemental SPA plan and
subsequent Tentative and Final Maps are approved and improvements are constructed.
Zone C contains the land within the District Commonly referred to as the "U.S. Olympic
Training Center." No assessments will be levied in Zone C until such time as a supplemen-
tal SPA Plan and subsequent Tentative and Final Maps are approved and improvements are
constructed.
JS5VEROMEI04177.RP1Vune 13, 1991
10
J(, - tiS
ASSESSMENT SCHEDULE
The assessments are to be spread in accordance with the benefit charge formula described
above. The individual 1991-1992 assessments, tabulated by assessor's parcel number, are
shown on an Assessment Roll on file in the office of the City Clerk of the City of Chula
Vista, are made a part of this report by reference, and are designated Exhibit B.
Summary of Assessments
A summary of the assessments to be paid by individual parcels is shown below. The
assessments vary according to traffic generation rates which, in turn, vary according to land
use and densi ty .
I Land Use I Assessment I
Low Density - Residential $7.511dwelling unit
Medium Density - Residential 6.01ldwelling unit
Employment Park 150.23/acre
Commercial 375.57/acre
JS5VEROMEI04177.RP1Vune 14. 1991
11
Jr,-l.//tI
EXHIBIT A - ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM
JS5'JEROMEI04177.RPTVune 13.1991
12
~,- '1r
EAST LAKE
~DED DIAGRAM
MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
NO. I
CITY
COUNTY OF SAN
OF CHULA
DIEGO, STATE
VISTA
OF CALIFQRNIA
,
,
I
~,'"
',',',
,
,
"
-
o
.00
\'"
"
"
"
~;.. ...". ','
~", ,
000
-
--070-01
',;liI'
-.0-,',,,,
AN ....EllMENT WM LI!VIED .., THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF CHULA YIlT,., STATE '" CALlPOIINlA, ON PARCELS OF
LAND IHOWN ON THII AllIENDB .......tMENT DIAQIIIAII MAP.
a.uo ""E''''fMT WAI LEVIED ON THE _ DAY OF _.
1110. .....0 AMENDED A......,.,. DIAQIIIAII AND THE AAESS-
IIENT ROLL WERE IIIECORDED IN THE OfFICE OF THE CITY
ENGIH&fI OF THE CITY OF CHULA VlITA ON THE DAY OF
_.1810. .....EIICE..IIADE TO THE AUESSIIENT ROLL
tlECOfIDID IN ,... OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER FOR THE
EXACT AIIOUNT OF EACH ....'n.MENl-LIYIED AGAINST EACH
'AIICEL OF LAND _ ON THIS AMENDED _ENT
DIAGRAM. - .
R!FPINCE IS HERBY MADE TO THE COUNTY OF
IAN DIEGO. ASlEIIOfIIlAJtC!L IIAPI POll DETAILED
DlMENltONS OF INOMDUAL ,.,UlCB.I.
CITY CLPK. CITY OF CHULA. vtaTA
,
LEGEND
RECOIIDED .. THE OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER OF THE CITY
"Of CHULA. YllTA TMII_ DAY OF , 1110.
~ ZONE A
em_
em Of CItlILA YlITA
--- ...~ DtSTRICT IIClC.ICWtY
~ ASSESSMENT NO
...... It THE OPPICE OF THE CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF
CNULA YllTA THII _ DAY OF 1110.
In-4"-1I
ASSESSOR'I PARCEL NO.
STREET MEDIAN LANJ5CAPE IMWTENANCE
em CLBlK. CITY OF CHUlA YllTA
--- -- STREET LNOICAPE: . TREE MAlfTENAHCE
OOUD'" DAY OF 1110 AT _ O'CLOCK IN
11tE QPfICe Of,. CJOUIm' M10rr0R OF THE THE COUNTY Of
SAIl DIeGO. STATE OF e.t.uFOFlNIA.
- --- SUPPLEMENTAL STREET UiHTlNG MAIfT'ENAf<<:E:
COUOITY AUDITOII OF ..... DI&IIO COUNTY
EASTlAKE ..AINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I
SHEET 1<<>, I OF I
~(,-
AMENDED DIAGRAM
EAST LAKE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
I I~~~ -=-:~~
~ .... 10.
\~'- '. ~, ....
~\\ (\ ~
~~ 1 \ /-= ~- ,....) /.~
~\\ \\ ) ) /:// ~"-"" .#~
'\ I ~~A \\J I .---;;:/ '\~ ~/
\ I I / \:::::'--.1;::/ ~,,/f/'/
\\1 V (? If )//
Ilj I \ \ II Ii!
I I \ II ~!
I \ 1 \~\ I \ ZONE B I
! iL Jl II
/1; \'=-1i=::~~ \11
II '\ ----' XII
I I ;1 ,,-- //----\~
I ill j; I \ --~~~/ \\
Ii I /! I I \\
I II \ \ ~
I II \ \ ~
I II \\ ",,~
_L II \" "\"
I I - '\ '\ /I-~
'\,'\ ;'/ ~
\" l/ \\
"~~ /// J~
~ . .// ~
,----------./ ......-::
----_.-/' /./""----
~//
~~~/
__ -o;;.MGE~ ~I~_--
---
--- ~
REFERENCE IS HEREBY MADE TO THE COUNTY OF
SAN DIEGO, ASSESSOR PARCEL MAPS FOR DETAILED
DIMENSIONS OF INDIVIDUAL PARCELS.
....
EASTlAKE MAINTENANCE DtSTRICT NO. I
SHEET NO,2 OF 3
~(,-'f'
AMENDED DIAGRAM
EAST LAKE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. I
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
q,~
~"
.......#
-- --"t
(/
I
,---//
(
I
I
\
,
\ ... H'
\ ;;/
"{II
\~
')
I
,/
...---;.. /,
( .>-.-----"
).
i
'l /f
- (,
----{
. ...
...
ZONE
c
REFERENCE IS HEREBY MADE TO THE COUNTY OF
SAN DIEGO, ASSESSOR PARCEL MAPS FOR DETAILED
DIMENSIONS OF INDIVIDUAL PARCELS.
-so
EASTLAKE MAINTENANCE [MSTRler NO. I
SHEET NO.3 OF 3
EXHIBIT B - ASSESSMENT ROLL
Sorted by Assessor Parcel Number
(on file in the Office of the City Clerk)
JS5IJEROMEI04177.RPTVune 13,1991
13
:J 11-5/
~ :I.'
ENGINEER'S REPORT
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
for
BAY BOULEVARD & TOWNE CENTER 1
LANDSCAPING DISTRICTS
FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 (RENEWAL)
Prepared by: Engineering Division
Department of Public Works
City of Chula Vista
~ (, -5 ~
ENGINEER'S REPORT
BAY BOULEVARD AND TOWN CENTRE 1
LANDSCAPING DISTRICTS
(Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972)
The City Engineer, Engineer of Work for Bay Boulevard and Town Centre 1
Light and Landscaping Maintenance Districts, City of Chula Vista, San Diego County,
California, makes this report, as directed by the City Council, Resolution 16133, dated
April 16, 1991, pursuant to Section 22585 of the Streets and Highways Code
(Landscaping and lighting Act of 1972).
The improvements which are the subject of this report are briefly described as
follows:
This report consists of six parts, as follows:
PART A Plans and specifications for the improvements are filed with the City
Clerk. Although separately bound, the plans and specifications are a part
of this report and are included in it by reference.
An estimate of the cost of improvement and net assessment.
An assessment of the estimated cost of the improvement on each
benefitted parcel of land within the assessment districts.
A statement of the method by which the undersigned has determined the
amount proposed to be assessed against each parcel.
A list of names and addresses of the owners of real property within
these assessment districts, as shown on the last equalized assessment
roll for taxes, or as known to the Clerk. The list is keyed to Exhibit C by
PART B
PART C
PART D
PART E
PART F
The renovation, improvement, maintenance,
and furnishing of electric current for the street
lights and appliances and for the landscaping
renovation and maintenance.
assessment number.
A diagram showing all of the parcels of real property within these
assessment districts. The diagram is keyed to Part C by assessment
number.
~lI-S.3
ENGINEER'S REPORT
BAY BOULEVARD AND TOWN CENTRE 1
LANDSCAPING DISTRICTS
(Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972)
The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed report as directed by the City
Council.
DATED:
, 1991
[Engineer of Work]
By:
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment
and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on the day of
, 1991.
City Clerk, City of Chula Vista
San Diego County, California
By:
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment
and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was approved and confirmed by the City
Council of the City of Chula Vista, California, on the day of
1991, Resolution No.
City Clerk, City of Chula Vista
San Diego County, California
By:
~ (, -5'1-
PART A
Plans and specifications for the improvement are numbered 82-1 to 82-7 dated Julv 2.1982
for Bav Boulevard Landscaping District and 78-254 to 306 dated December 8. 1978 for
Town Centre 1 Landscapinl! District. These plans and specifications have been filed
separately with the Street Superintendent of the legislative body and are incorporated in this
Report by reference.
;2 16 -55
PART B--ESTIMATE OF COST AND NET ASSESSMENT
BAY BOULEVARD LANDSCAPING DISTRICT
CONTRACI'UAL SERVICES
$ 0
8250
1870
850
230
180
410
100
------
$ 11890
8147
CITY STAFF SERVICES
UTILITIES
LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES
MATERIALS TO MAINTAIN BLDGS, STRUCTURE, GRDS
ADVERTISING
TRASH COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL
BACKFWW CERTIF
ESTIMATED MAINTENANCE COST
RESERVE REQUIREMENT (EXCEEDS 50%)
LESS BALANCE AVAILABLE FROM
PREVIOUS FISCAL YEAR
8147
NET ASSESSl1ENT
$ 11890
:l"-5b
PART B--ESTIMATE OF COST AND NET ASSESSMENT
TOWN CENTRE 1 LANDSCAPING DISTRICT
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
CITY STAFF SERVICES
UTILITIES
LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES
MATERIALS TO MAINTAIN BLDGS, STRUCTURE, GRDS
ADVERTISING
OTHER COMMODITIES
BACKFLOW CERTIF
ESTIMATED MAINTENANCE COST
RESERVE REQUIREMENT (50%)
LESS BALANCE AVAILABLE FROM
PREVIOUS FISCAL YEAR
NET ASSESSMENT
:J (, -5 =1-
$ 10000
31970
6860
1100
2000
180
250
100
$ 52460
26230
26718
$ 51972
PART C: ASSESSMENT ROLL
BAY BOULEVARD LANDSCAPING DISTRICT
1991/92 ASSESSMENT PER UNIT =
1,189.00
ASSESSOR PARCEL # BENEFIT UNIT 91/92 ASSESSMENT
567-021-36 3.50 4,161.50
567-021-37 2.70 3,210.30
567-021-38 2.70 3,210.30
567-021-29 1.10 1,307.90
10.00 11,890.00
,2(, -s 8
TOWNE CENTRE 1 LANDSCAPING DISTRICT
1991/92 ASSESSMENT PER UNIT = 51.98
568-044-12
568-044-13
568-044-14
568-044-15
568-044-16
568-044-17
568-044-18
568-044-19
568-044-20
568-044-21
568-044-22
568-044-23
568-071-01
568-071-02
568-071-03
568-071-04
568-071-05
568-071-12
568-071-13
568-071-14
568-071-15
568-071-16
568-071-17
568-152-06
568-152-07
568-152-08
568-152-09
568-152-10
568-152-11
568-152-13
568-152-16
568-152-17
568-152-18
568-152-19
568-152-20
568-152-21
568-161-03
568-161-04
568-161-05
568-161-06
568-161-07
568-161-08
568-161-09
568-161-10
568-161-11
568-161-12
568-161-13
568-161-26
568-161-27
568-161-28
12.30
11. 40
10.20
13.40
10.90
7.00
26.10
10.80
14.10
11. 30
15.20
18.20
25.90
14.80
11. 20
7.00
23.90
10.80
15.20
10.60
16.30
18.30
12.60
8.80
8.10
14.50
13.00
7.10
7.70
11. 80
15.00
16.80
15.00
18.70
13.10
17.60
10.80
15.20
5.70
8.30
6.60
12.80
7.40
11. 90
12.90
12.60
7.30
19.10
6.70
12.60
639.36
592.58
530.20
696.54
566.58
363.86
1,356.68
561.38
732.92
587.38
790.10
946.04
1,346.28
769.30
582.18
363.86
1,242.32
561.38
790.10
551. 00
847.28
951. 24
654.96
457.42
421. 04
753.72
675.74
369.06
400.26
613.36
779.70
873.26
779.70
972.04
680.94
914.86
561. 38
790.10
296.30
431.44
343.08
665.34
384.66
618.56
670.54
654.96
379.46
992.82
348.28
654.96
:J t, -5'9
168-161-35 16.10 836.88
568-270-20 22.70 1.179.96
568-270-21 42.10 2.188.36
568-270-22 31.10 1,616.58
568-270-23 15.20 790.10
568-270-27 15.00 779.70
568-333-01 21.10 1.096.78
568-333-02 3.90 202.72
568-333-03 3.90 202.72
568-333-04 7.80 405.44
568-333-05 3.90 202.72
568-333-06 .3.90 202.72
568-333-07 3.90 202.72
568-333-08 5.00 259.90
568-334-01 15.50 805.70
568-334-02 3.90 202.72
568-334-03 3.90 202.72
568-334-04 15.50 805.70
568-350-19 15.50 805.70
568-350-20 3.90 202.72
568-350-21 7.80 405.44
568-350-23 3.10 161.14
568-350-25 8.60 447.04
568-350-39 5.70 296.30
568-350-40 5.70 296.30
568-351-01 7.80 405.44
568-351-02 4.40 228.72
568-351-03 6.30 327.48
568-270-30 11.00 571. 78
568-300-46 41. 20 2,141.58
1.000.00 51,980.29
;; , - 60
PART D -. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT
The manner in which the City Engineer has apportioned the annual assessment to each
parcel in the Landscaping District is consitent with the method of spread initially established
by the Assessment Engineer, Patrick N. Rossetti.
~ , - /,/
PART E -- PROPERTY OWNER'S LIST
. The property owner's list is made a part of this report by reference and
is filed in the Office of the City Treasurer.
/
;J ~ - (,,J
PART F u ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM (Attached)
;) (, - ~J
I
,
l) I~+r.i ,-t- I
BoU."dAr,
.
.
(
c
....
-/I
I
."e"
ANrll~/.IY'S .
I .eGS7AUI!ANr
@
I ~ ~'7'()21.29) .
~ --
I ~ ""AVS INN
"-J M() raR
,ItJOGc
:f:!: (~t:7'()21.38)
).. (2)
'i'oq;; -_
, I EL T()~I fa
II CQ ,.f'eST"~U./I?ANr
i I
Ii : (?67'()21'.37)
Ii CD
ll.
iii I
ij
/1
Ii
'I
II'
il
1/ ";::;"
II
'-<./
"
"(
r....
VJ
~
IlJ
~I
I
I
~ .
)..
"'t
~
~
~
~
It
Il)
I
DRAWN BY TJTL~
- - - - ?_A.o.:. -- SAY eOULEVARD
0:'.(
- - .O'!-)9_ 89_ _ LIGHTING a LANDSCAPING DISTRICT
~f,-
~
-
~(
-
-
Tf
f
/I ST,
~
-
-
I
I
I
-
-
sr.
Jl
~
II
.'. -.- . -..'-.,.......
. :
--_._..-..~-.. .
.-F "
--sl '"
"-l I\j
. I
~ ~
III CIj
----@ -,(~F---
ASseSSORS
BOOK
N~ 5G8
G I T Y
PARK
(;2)
" ~ "
OWN BY: '/WI-I
.-....._. -'.~ ..
. .-- . - ...~ n. .___......
-s T ,C?C.C
~
.
~
"'.--..
l\j
'D', ~+ric.:f.---
Bo~_,:, d a.r'L
--e--
--~._._-
-'--
I
r.__..
'I( '" ....
"--'---
. _n . _._ ._u _~. _ .'_._
270-20
o "n --.
333-0/ e
.- 33 -02 ~
3 -03
3.3.3-04
333-0$
333-0~
333.07
33.3. OIJ
-- -
..-., ._---..
- -- __"_d.
270-22
.
----... ..---
---@-- 270. 23
PA I<! ~
WA Y'
STReET
@
~
.. '-,......-.
-
CcN cR Si.
@
~
394,04 @
.
4J
~
~
Cl\
"l
,
~
....
~~
~'&I
....
3$0-25
,3S'0 - 2 (
3.50- 20
,350-/9
~
~
.....
~
"
-
334 - 0
334-0.
- ----.. 3"S1':.-o-r-
-- ,. ..,--- --- -~51 =-OZ
35/-03
3
@
30"..%
'0
~.
350-23
o
@
~
~
- SHT 2 OF" 2
..--J FilE NO JO-009
DATE:
iOJ'/N C,:;;v;r;;.= NE I 51;;'=~T UCi-ITlNC 1/
/ '~c:./'.,....~ .....,.~.-^/..IC,.... r;/5~r;/C~
L. ~ 1 \.: i-/ ..= c.. .- 1-' !: i .. ,. 1"1 1 I '-./ ,. .:: /' .-, 1 V ...: '../ I /""'\ I
;Jf,-{"S
, I I .. .
,
"E" - - .? e. IE. 7
--
@ 044,2.:1 07/-01 @
" . ... . . b i &'h-, c.t
. .
@ Cl44.22 07/-02 e f>C&.l~ do. ry
@) 044 '21 071-03 ~
ASSESSORS
800K 0 044'20 .071 -04- /6
NR 568 @) 044-/9 07/-05 @
0 044-18 lU 071-12 @
~ 044 -17 ~ 071-13 @
044-/~ ~ 071-14 @
CV I'd
044-15 ~ 071-15 @
0
044'14 ~ @ ..
07/-16
0 044'13
0) 044-12 071-17 0
-.
OA VIOS 0 It .sI- Re E 7"
-
@ 152 -21 1~/-26 ~
/tDl-03
~ @ 152-2.L) 161-04 ([t!
:s ~ ~ 152-19 161-0.5 ;-
""
Q) 1~/-06 ~
~ ~ @ 152 - l(j 1~/-07 ~
:::l
~ 1~/-08 ~3'
~ @ /52 -17
~ Q IIE/-09 @
~ V) @ 152 -13 C{ I~ I - 10 e
....
::: " @
Q ~ 152 - 16 :t 161 - II
If)
If) ~ "- ~ 0
q; /52 - II 1~/-12 / . '"
. ~ 152 - 10 ~
0 " @ I~I - 13 \: . /
/52- 09 I~/- 27
~ /.52-08 I~ I' 28 (@
152. 07 161- .35 @
/52. 06
-;;:~ I I
-- S T E E E 7" Si-iT r OF 2
! , ! FILE NO.JO-OO9
OWN BY: '/Wfi TOWN CENTER N~ I 51REf"T L/CHT/AlG 4
/' nc:c~r"'~ 1~/~'INT=N,..1NC.5 DISTRICT
DATE: _,....IV.;.../~ ,....,.-=
.:2~-bb
(
~~"
ENGINEER'S REPORT
LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
for
OPEN SPACE DISTRICTS NO.1
THROUGH 11, 14, 15, 17, AND 18
FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 (RENEWAL)
Prepared by: Engineering Division
Department of Public Works
City of Chula Vista
~~-(P1-
ENGINEER'S REPORT
OPEN SPACE DISTRICTS NO.1 THROUGH 11, 14, 15, 17, AND 18
(Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972)
The City Engineer, Engineer of Work for Open Space Districts 1 through 11, 14,
15, 17, and 18, City of Chula Vista, San Diego County, California, makes this report,
as directed by the City Council, Resolution 16133, dated April 16, 1991, pursuant to
Section 22585 of the Streets and Highways Code (Landscaping and Lighting Act of
1972).
The improvements which are the subject of this report are briefly described as
follows:
The renovation, improvement, maintenance,
and furnishing of electric current for the street
lights and appliances and for the landscaping
renovation and maintenance.
This report consists of six parts, as follows:
PART A Plans and specifications for the improvements are filed with the City
Clerk. Although separately bound, the plans and specifications are a part
of this report and are included in it by reference.
An estimate of the cost of improvement and net assessment.
PART B
PART C
PART D
PART E
PART F
An assessment of the estimated cost of the improvement on each
benefitted parcel of land within the assessment districts.
A statement of the method by which the undersigned has determined the
amount proposed to be assessed against each parcel.
A list of names and addresses of the owners of real property within
these assessment districts, as shown on the last equalized assessment
roll for taxes, or as known to the Clerk. The list is keyed to Exhibit C by
assessment number.
A diagram showing all of the parcels of real property within these
assessment districts. The diagram is keyed to Part C by assessment
number.
J(,-ltJg
ENGINEER'S REPORT
OPEN SPACE DISTRICTS NO.1 THROUGH 11. 14. 15. 17. AND 18
(Pursuant to the Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972)
The undersigned respectfully submits the enclosed report as directed by the City
Council.
DATED:
, 1991
[Engineer of Work]
By:
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment
and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was filed with me on the day of
, 1991.
City Clerk, City of Chula Vista
San Diego County, California
By:
I HEREBY CERTIFY that the enclosed Engineer's Report, together with Assessment
and Assessment Diagram thereto attached, was approved and confirmed by the City
Council of the City of Chula Vista, California, on the day of
1991, Resolution No.
City Clerk, City of Chula Vista
San Diego County, California
By:
.)'-(p~
PART A
Plans and specifications for the improvement of Open Space Districts 1 through 11,
14, 15, 17, and 18 have been filed separately with the Street Superintendent of the
legislative body and are incorporated in this Report by reference.
:2 ~ - TO
PART B--ESTIMATE OF COST AND NET ASSESSMENT
OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NO. 1
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
CITY STAFF SERVICES
$26630
4570
UTILITIES
11370
LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES
SERVICE TO MAINTAIN BLDGS, STRUCTURE, GRDS
MATERIALS TO MAINTAIN BLDGS, STRUCTURE, GRDS
760
280
930
ESTIMATED MAINTENANCE COST
$44540
RESERVE REQUIREMENT (50%)
LESS BALANCE AVAILABLE FROM
PREVIOUS FISCAL YEAR
22270
23157
NET ASSESSMENT
$43653
.;}(,-rl
PART B--ESTIMATE OF COST AND NET ASSESSMENT
OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NO. 2
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
CITY STAFF SERVICES
$ 7170
1770
UTILITIES
1700
LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES
SERVICE TO MAINTAIN BLDGS, STRUCTURE, GRDS
MATERIALS TO MAINTAIN BLDGS, STRUCTURE, GRDS
340
40
380
ESTIMATED MAINTENANCE COST
$11400
RESERVE REQUIREMENT (50%)
LESS BALANCE AVAILABLE FROM
PREVIOUS FISCAL YEAR
5700
8161
NET ASSESSMENT
$ 8939
~ (,-;;t
PART B--ESTIMATE OF COST AND NET ASSESSMENT
OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NO. 3
<X>NTRACTUAL SERVICES
CITY STAFF SERVICES
UTILITIES
LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES
SERVICE TO MAINTAIN BLDGS, STRUCTURE, GRDS
MATERIALS TO MAINTAIN BLDGS, STRUCTURE, GRDS
$26060
4650
10190
210
400
1480
ESTIMATED MAINTENANCE COST
$42990
RESERVE REQUIREMENT (40%)
LESS BALANCE AVAILABLE FROM
PREVIOUS FISCAL YEAR
17196
14764
NET ASSESSMENT
$45422
JftJ-T3
PART B--ESTIMATE OF.COST AND NET ASSESSMENT
OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NO. 4
CONTRACTUAL SERVI CES
CITY STAFF SERVICES
UTILITIES
LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES
SERVICE TO MAINTAIN BLDGS. STRUCTURE, GRDS
MATERIALS TO MAINTAIN BLDGS. STRUCTURE, GRDS
ESTIMATED MAINTENANCE COST
RESERVE REQUIREMENT (50%)
LESS BALANCE AVAILABLE FROM
PREVIOUS FISCAL YEAR
NET ASSESSMENT
:;iI-T~
$28420
5770
10850
1100
600
1740
$48480
24240
28252
$44468
PART B--ESTH1ATE OF COST AND NET ASSESSMENT
OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NO. 5
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
CITY STAFF SERVICES
UTILITIES
LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES
SERVICE TO MAINTAIN BLDGS, STRUCTURE, GRDS
MATERIALS TO MAINTAIN BLDGS, STRUCTURE, GRDS
ESTIMATED MAINTENANCE COST
RESERVE REQUIREMENT (50%)
LESS BALANCE AVAILABLE FROM
PREVIOUS FISCAL YEAR
NET ASSESSMENT
>-
~,-:rs
$20370
4430
7520
950
120
1020
$34410
17205
19806
$31809
PART B--ESTIMATE OF COST AND NET ASSESSMENT
OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NO. 6
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
CITY STAFF SERVICES
UTILITIES
LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES
SERVICE TO MAINTAIN BLDGS, STRUCTURE, GRDS
MATERIALS TO MAINTAIN BLDGS, STRUCTURE, GRDS
ESTIMATED MAINTENANCE COST
RESERVE REQUIREMENT (50%)
LESS BALANCE AVAILABLE FROM
PREVIOUS FISCAL YEAR
NET ASSESSMENT
;;(,-7("
$12250
2650
5600
310
120
780
$21710
10855
10461
T-----
$22104
PART B--ESTIMATE OF COST AND NET ASSESSMENT
OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NO. 7
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
$ 4460
1760
3220
230
200
CITY STAFF SERVICES
UTILITIES
.
LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES
SERVICE TO MAINTAIN BLDGS, STRUCTURE, GRDS
MATERIALS TO MAINTAIN BLDGS, STRUCTURE, GRDS
360
ESTIMATED MAINTENANCE COST
$10230
RESERVE REQUIREMENT (EXCEEDS 50%)
LESS BALANCE AVAILABLE FROM
7877
PREVIOUS FISCAL YEAR
7877
NET ASSESSMENT
$10230
~h-Tr
PART B--ESTIMATE OF COST AND NET ASSESSMENT
OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NO. 8
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
$29540
CITY STAFF SERVICES
UTILITIES
LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES
4810
SERVICE TO MAINTAIN BLDGS, STRUCTURE, GRDS
9520
420
320
MATERIALS TO MAINTAIN BLDGS, STRUCTURE, GRDS
350
ESTIMATED MAINTENANCE COST
$44960
RESERVE REQUIREMENT (50%)
22480
LESS BALANCE AVAILABLE FROM
PREVIOUS FISCAL YEAR
17278
NET ASSESSMENT
$50162
J(,-r1
PART B--ESTIMATE OF COST AND NET ASSESSMENT
OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NO. 9
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
CITY STAFF SERVICES
UTILITIES
LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES
$22270
6860
18850
1010
SERVICE TO MAINTAIN BLDGS. STRUCTURE. GRDS
MATERIALS TO MAINTAIN BLDGS. STRUCTURE. GRDS
TRASH COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL
320
4290
1260
ESTIMATED MAINTENANCE COST
$54860
RESERVE REQUIREMENT (50%)
27430
LESS BALANCE AVAILABLE FROM
PREVIOUS FISCAL YEAR
45149
NET ASSESSMENT
$37141
~f.-~9
PART B--ESTIMATE OF COST AND NET ASSESSMENT
OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NO. 10
CONTRACTUAL SERVI CES
CITY STAFF SERVICES
$28390
5680
UTILITIES
11740
LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES
740
SERVICE TO MAINTAIN BLDGS, STRUCTURE, GRDS
200
MATERIALS TO MAINTAIN BLDGS, STRUCTURE, GRDS
820
LADERA VILLAS
26500
ESTIMATED MAINTENANCE COST
$74070
~ESRRVE REQUIREMENT (50%)
LESS BALANCE AVAILABLE FROM
PREVIOUS FISCAL YEAR
37035
28232
NET ASSESSMENT
$82873
~ (, -80
PART B--ESTIMATE OF COST AND NET ASSESSMENT
OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NO. 11
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
CITY STAFF SERVICES
UTILITIES
LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES
SERVICE TO MAINTAIN BLDGS, STRUCTURE, GRDS
MATERIALS TO MAINTAIN BLDGS, STRUCTURE, GRDS
$ 73460
8880
17890
310
360
2550
ESTIMATED MAINTENANCE COST
$103450
RESERVE REQUIREMENT (50%)
LESS BAlJl~CE AVAILABLE FROM
51725
PREVIOUS FISCAL YEAR
41242
NET ASSESSMENT
$113933
~~ -8/
PART B--ESTIMATE OF COST AND NET ASSESSMENT
OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NO. 14
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
CITY STAFF SERVICES
$178410
39750
UTILITIES
89960
LAl;DSCAPE SUPPLIES
SERVICE TO MAINTAIN BLDGS, STRUCTURE, GRDS
MATERIALS TO MAINTAIN BLDGS, STRUCTURE, GRDS
3180
1240
6760
ESTIMATED MAINTENANCE COST
$319300
RESERVE REQUIREMENT (30%)
95790
LESS Eft.LANCE AVAILABLE FROM
PREVIOUS FISCAL YEAR
94382
NET ASSESSMENT
$320708
J(,-f;Z
PART B--ESTIMATE OF ODST AND NET ASSESSMENT
OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NO. 15
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
CITY STAFF SERVICES
UTILITIES
IANDSCAPE SUPPLIES
SERVICE TO MAINTAIN BLDGS, STRUCTURE, GRDS
MATERIALS TO MAINTAIN BLDGS, STRUCTURE, GRDS
ESTIMATED MAINTENANCE COST
RESERVE REQUIREMENT (30%)
LESS BAIANCE AVAIlABLE FROM
PREVIOUS FISCAL YEAR
NET ASSESSMENT
;) " -1..3
$ 7380
1940
3490
200
120
240
$ 1'3370
4011
4317
$ 13064
PART B--ESTIMATE OF COST AND NET ASSESSMENT
OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NO. 17
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
CITY STAFF SERVICES
UTILITIES
LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES
SERVICE TO MAINTAIN BLOOS, STRUCTURE, GRDS
MATERIALS TO MAINTAIN BLOOS, STRUCTURE, GRDS
ESTIMATED MAINTENANCE COST
RESERVE REQUIREMENT (50%)
LESS BALANCE AVAILABLE FROM
PREVIOUS FISCAL YEAR
NET ASSESSMENT
;}(,-'~
$ 5800
2900
o
$ 8700
PART B--ESTIMATE OF COST AND NET ASSESSMENT
OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NO. 18
CONTRACTUAL SERVICES
CITY STAFF SERVICES
UTILITIES
LANDSCAPE SUPPLIES
MATERIALS TO MAINTAIN BLDGS, STRUCTURE, GRDS
ESTIMATED MAINTENANCE COST
RESERVE REQUIREMENT (30%)
LESS BALANCE AVAILABLE FROM
PREVIOUS FISCAL YEAR
NET ASSESSMENT
;}{,-'is
$ 75730
13380
48580
990
1980
$140660
42198
35417
$147441
PART C: ASSESSMENT ROLL
OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NO. 1
1991/92 ASSESSMENT PER UNIT = 54.88
ASSESSMENT # ASSESSOR PARCEL # BENEFIT UNIT 91/92 ASSESSMENT
C 640-060-11 7.70 422.58
D 640-090-04 34.00 1,865.92
I 641-030-12 1.00 54.88
J 641-040-01 2.45 134.46
B 642-010-38 3.67 201. 41
E 642-040-01 10.00 548.80
G 642-040-02 10.00 548.80
H-1 642-040-12 16.35 897.30
H-2 642-040-13 45.50 2,497.04
L -I 642-040-15 10.00 548.80
M 642-050-26 1.39 76.28
L-2A 642-050-22 6.67 366.06
L-2B 642-251-01 TO 32 32.00 1,756.16
642-252-01 TO 20 20.00 1,097.60
642-253-01 TO 44 44.00 2,414.72
642-261-01 TO 17 17.00 932.96
642-262-01 TO 36 36.00 1,975.68
642-271-01 TO 38 38.00 2,085.44
642-272-~1 TO 53 53.00 2,908.64
642-291-01 TO 28 26.00 1,536.64
642-304-01 TO 17 17.00 932.96
642-305-01 TO 13 13.00 713.44
642-306-01 TO 38 38.00 2,085.44
642-306-40 TO 46 7.00 384.16
642-306-50 1.00 54.88
642-311-01 TO 21 21.00 1,152.48
642-312-01 TO 07 7.00 384.16
642-313-01 TO 11 11. 00 603.68
642-314-01 TO 24 24.00 1,317.12
642-315-01 TO 07 7.00 384.16
642-320-01 TO 55 55.00 3,018.40
642-330-04-01-38 38.00 2,085.44
642-340-01 TO 36 36.00 1,975.68
642-342-01 TO 47 47.00 2,579.36
N-I .If 642-050-16 2.79 153.12
642-400-01 TO 39 39.00 2,140.32
642-401-01 TO 15 15.00 823.20
795.52 43,658.16
*INVOICE DIRECTLY TO PACIFIC BELL
1090 APACHE DRIVE
~ , -it.
PART C: ASSESSMENT ROLL
OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NO. 2
1991/92 ASSESSMENT PER UNIT = 35.90
624-020-64 TO 77 14.00 502.60
624-340-50 TO 62 13.00 466.70
624-341-01 TO 11 11. 00 394.90
624-381-01 TO 09 9.00 323.10
624-383-01 TO 28 28.00 1,005.20
624-385-01 TO 17 17.00 610.30
624-385-20 TO 50 31.00 1,112.90
624-390-01 TO 38 38.00 1,364.20
624-392-01 TO 04 4.00 143.60
624-393-01 TO 16 16.00 574.40
624-394-01 TO 15 15.00 538.50
624-401-01 TO 28 28.00 1,005.20
624-402-01 TO 22 22.00 789.80
624-403-01 TO 03 3.00 107.70
249.00 8,939.10
~~-gr
PART C: ASSESSMENT ROLL
OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NO. 3
1991/92 ASSESSMENT PER UNIT =
357.66
ASSESSOR PARCEL # BENEFIT utlIT 91/92 ASSESSMENT
593-261-01 TO 31 31.00 11,087.46
593-271-01 TO 38 .38.00 13,591. 08
593-271-40 TO 52 13.00 4,649.58
593-272-07 TO 21 15.00 5,364.90
593-272-23 1.00 357.66
593-262-01 TO 09 9.00 3,218.94
593-262-11 TO 24 14.00 5,007.24
293-262-29 1.00 357.66
593-272-01 TO 03 3.00 1,072.98
593-272-05 1.00 357.66
593-272-26 1.00 357.66
127.00 45,422.82
~ f.I -ae
PART C: ASSESSMENT ROLL
OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NO. 4
1991/92 ASSESSMENT PER UNIT =
213.80
ASSESSOR PARCEL # BENEFIT UNIT 91/92 ASSESSMENT
593-291-01 TO 07
593-291-11 TO 19
593-291-22
593-291-25 TO 27
593-291-32 TO 33
593-292-01 TO 28
593-292-30 TO 40
593-292-43
593-330-01 TO 13
593-340-01 TO 22
594-221-01 TO 25
594-221-27 TO 48
594-222-01 TO 25
594-280-01 TO 30
594-280-32 TO 40
;;~ .g,
7.00
9.00
1.00
3.00
2.00
28.00
11. 00
1.00
13.00
22.00
25.00
22.00
25.00
30.00
9.00
1,496.60
1,924.20
213.80
641.40
427.60
5,986.40
2,351. 80
213.80
2,779.40
4,703.60
5,345.00
4,703.60
5,345.00
6,414.00
1,924.20
208.00
44,470.40
PART C: ASSESSMENT ROLL
OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NO. 5
1991-92 ASSESSMENT PER UNIT
640-101-02 TO 25
640-102-01 TC 20
640-103-01 TO 14
640-104-01 TC 12
640-110-01 TC 43
640-211-16 TC 24
24.00
20.00
14.00
12.00
43.00
9.00
122.00
260.74
6,257.76
5,214.80
3,650.36
3,128.88
11,211.82
2,346.66
31,810.28
;) ~ - t!fO
PART C: ASSESSMENT ROLL
OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NO. 6
1991-92 ASSESSMENT PER UNIT
639-701-01 TO 59
639-702-01 TO 52
639-710-01 TO 51
59.00
52.00
51.00
162.00
.J1,-9/
136.44
8,049.96
7,094.88
6,958.44
22,103.28
PART C: ASSESSMENT ROLL
OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NO. 7
1991-92 ASSESSMENT PER UNIT
620-651-01 TO 02
620-651-05 TO 32
620-652-01 TO 07
620-652-12 TO 50
620-660-01 TO 18
620-660-20 TO 29
2.00
28.00
7:00
39.00
18.00
10.00
104.00
;J~-";)
98.36
196.72
2.754.08
688.52
3.836.04
1.770.48
983.60
10.229.44
PART C: ASSESSMENT ROLL
OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NO. 8
1991-92 ASSESSMENT PER UNIT
593-301-01 TO 24
593-302-01 TO 29
593-311-01 TO 25
593-312-01 TO 32
24.00
29.00
25.00
32.00
110.00
~ , - 93
456.02
10,944.48
13,224.58
11,400.50
14,592.64
50,162.20
PART C: ASSESSMENT ROLL
OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NO. 9
1991-92 ASSESSMENT PER UNIT
640-141-01 TO 24
640-142-01 TO 07
640-142-09 TO 28
640-151-01 TO 45
640-152-01 TO 56
640-161-01 TO 44
640-162-01 TO 52
640-171-01 TO 45
640-172-01 TO 48
640-180-01 TO 43
24.00
7.00
20'.00
45.00
56.00
44.00
52.00
45.00
48.00
43.00
384.00
2 , - 9ttf
96.72
2,321.28
677 .04
1,934.40
4,352.40
5,416.32
4,255.68
5,029.44
4,352.40
4,642.56
4,158.96
37,140.48
PART C: ASSESSMENT ROLL
OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NO. 10
1991/92 ASSESSMENT PER UNIT = 131.48
640-050-18 2.61 343.16
640-050-19 4.76 625.84
640-191-01 to 20 20.00 2,629.60
640-192-01 to 34 34.00 4,470.32
640-193-01 to 34 34.00 4,470.32
640-194-01 to 30 30.00 3,944.40
640-195-01 to 19 19.00 2,498.12
640-196-01 to 23 23.00 3,024.04
640-197-01 to 34 34.00 4,470.32
640-198-01 to 26 26.00 3,418.48
640-200-01 to 76 7<'.00 9,992.48
640-211-03 to 13 11. 00 1,446.28
640-211-25 to 26 2.00 262.96
640-212-01 to 14 14.00 1,840.72
640-213-01 to 21 21. 00 2,761. 08
640-221-01 to 25 25.00 3,287.00
640-222-01 to 35 35.00 4,601.80
640-231-01 to 39 39.00 5,127.72
640-232-01 to 06 6.00 788.88
640-232-10 to 28 19.00 2,498.12
640-232-31 to 50 20.00 2,629.60
640-:&32-53 1.00 131.48
640-232-56 to 57 2.00 262.96
640-233-01 to 46 46.00 6,048.08
640-234-01 to 46 46.00 6,048.08
640-234-48 1.00 131. 48
640-234-52 to 61 10.00 1,314.80
640-300-01 to 29 29.00 3,812.92
630.37 82,881.05
J (, - 95
PART C: ASSESSMENT ROLL
OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NO. 11
1991/92 ASSESSMENT PER UNIT = 86.18
ASSESSOR PARCEL # BENEFIT UNIT 91/92 ASSESSMENT
592-161-01 to 34
592-162-01
592-162-04 to 26
592-162-28 to 42
592-162-44 to 46
592-171-01 to 60
592-172-01 to 39
592-172-41 to 62
592-172-65 to 66
592-181-01 to 38
592-182-01 to 47
592-183-01 to 36
592-191-20-01-48
592-191-21-01-52
592-192-03
592-192-22
592-192-23
592-200-01
592-2GO-02
592-200-03
592-231-01 to 40
592-230-01 to 45
592-210-01 to 17
592-210-19 to 89
592-211-01 to 36
* 592-220-01 to 09
* 592-221-01 to 04
592-200-04
592-200-05
592-200-06
592-200-07
592-200-08
592-200-09
592-200-10
592-200-11
592-200-12
592-200-13
592-200-14
592-200-15
592-200-16
592-200-17
592-200-18
34.00
1.00
23.00
15.00
3.00
60.00
39.00
22.00
2.00
38.00
47.00
36.00
48.00
52.00
30.00
86.00
88.00
70.89
23.72
23.04
40.00
45.00
17.00
71. 00
36.00
160.00
70.00
6.63
31.11
2.64
6.80
21.17
6.80
2.13
7.40
7.14
8.33
11. 73
5.86
8.42
6.72
8.50
1,322.03
* 230 UNITS TOTAL
PRORATED BY NUMBER OF LOTS
NO SUB ID AVAILABLE AS OF 6/13/91
~ ~ -91P
2,930.12
86.18
1,982.14
1,292.70
258.54
5,170.80
3,361.02
1,895.96
172.36
3,274.84
4,050.46
3,102.48
4,136.64
4,481.36
2,585.40
7,411.48
7,583.84
6,109.30
2,044.20
1,985.60
3,447.20
3,878.10
1,465.06
6,118.78
3,102.48
13,788.80
6,032.60
571. 38
2,681.06
227.52
586.02
1,824.44
586.02
183.56
637.74
615.34
717.88
1,010.90
505.02
725.64
579.14
732.54
113,932.65
PART C: ASSESSMENT ROLL
OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NO. 14
1991/92 ASSESSMENT PER UNIT =
369.38
ASSESSOR PARCEL # BENEFIT UNIT 91/92 ASSESSMENT
594-070-04 to 59
594-071-01 to 64
594-071-67
594-110-13
594-110-14
594-321-01 to 63
594-322-01 to 70
594-323-01 to 66
594-341-01 to 55
594-342-01 to 50
594-343-01 to 25
594-351-01 to 10
594-351-12 to 16
594-351-18
594-351-22 to 23
594-352-01 to 19
594-361-01 to 20
594-361-22 to 30
594-361-32
594-362-01 to 42
594-371-01 to 27
594-372-01 to 46
594-381-01 to 29
594-382-01 to 42
594-383-01 to 22
594-384-01 to 41
594-391-01 to 34
594-392-01 to 34
594-393-01 to 28
56.00
64.00
1.00
5.32
0.90
63.00
70.00
66.00
55.00
50.00
25.00
10.00
5.00
1.00
2.00
19.00
20.00
9.00
Leo
42.00
27.00
46.00
29.00
42.00
22.00
41. 00
34.00
34.00
28.00
868.22
Page 1
~,,-~:t-
20,685.28
23,640.32
369.38
1,965.10
332.44
23,270.94
25,856.60
24,379.08
20,315.90
18,469.00
9,234.50
3,693.80
1,846.90
369.38
738.76
7,018.22
7,387.60
3,324.42
369.38
15,513.96
9,973.26
16,991.48
10,712.02
15,513.96
8,126.36
15,144.58
12,558.92
12,558.92
10,342.64
320,703.10
PART C: ASSESSMENT ROLL
OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NO. 15
1991/92 ASSESSMENT PER UNIT =
594-311-01 to 17
594-311-22 to 39
594-311-43 to 46
594-312-01 to 18
;1(, - 'jfl
229.20
17.00
18.00
4.00
18.00
3,896.40
4,125.60
916.80
4,125.60
57.00
13,064.40
PART C: ASSESSMENT ROLL
OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NO. 17
1991/92 ASSESSMENT PER UNIT =
640-240-01
640-240-04 to 46
640-240-48 to 49
~ ~ - 9'J
189.14
1.00
43.00
2.00
189.14
8,133.02
378.28
46.00
8,700.44
PART C: ASSESSMENT ROLL
OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NO. 18
1991/92 ASSESSMENT PER UNIT = 380.44
640-070-39 100.00 38,044.00
640-070-40 2.55 970.12
640-251-01 to 53 53.00 20,163.32
640-252-01 to 40 40.00 15,217.60
640-252-44 to 59 16.00 6,087.04
640-260-01 to 29 29.00 11,032.76
640-260-31 to 71 41. 00 15,598.04
640-260-74 1.00 380.44
640-271-01 to 56 56.00 21,304.64
640-272-01 to 49 49.00 18,641.56
387.55 147,439.52
.;; {, -/0 ()
PART D -- METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF ASSESSMENT
The manner in which the City Engineer has apportioned the annual assessment to each
parcel in the Open Space Districts is consistent with the method of spread initially
established by the Assessment Engineer.
.;)(,-101
PART E -- PROPERlY OWNER'S LIST
· The property owner's list is made a part of this report by reference and
is fIled in the Office of the City Treasurer.
~'-I()-
PART F -- ASSESSMENT DIAGRAM (Attached)
:J (, -10.3
OPEN
OF THE
SPACE DISTRICT
CITY OF CHULA
DE SC"IPT ION
,_,..._..._1..._ IO.~.'....................
_.J.. ._......_..... _ c"," ,....._ ........
_...... <..-.. 't'" ____._.... _. ,......_.
.. .-...,-...........-......-<---...
._......_.......-...._,..'.~._..-...
-....- .., .....~ ...... -. -.....
~-~"'::."..~-
~:f:~:f:~:~
~l.O
, """'"0'''''0'''
-~
~.:!.~ ~I-,",,,,~~~~!'l:!!~
-
. ,
NO. I
VISTA
.......---
'-'--7---- ..,.
'0'
-_.. .:
----
---f--
/
/
/
/
/
, 'c'
..
t<#!".....
-..-.-..-.........-.....-..-
,...._.._.--...--"..--..
,_,,_ ....._.. . It. ...... __...,...~...._
-.....-...-...,-........,.-....-.
- "-'''- ..... ......,- "-'''' -,.-
_ Mh ~......."....__"......_...
~ ....._.. - roo-... ,.." ,._ _. _'''_
_I _'... _'"', _ _II ....___
........,.._,,_0.-..___.. "'_"_
..-......_......,.....
,'; r;'1'.':'" - r :.:' .1. t.::_,
/'
(
'- - .". ..-.. ,..-... -_. ."
.......-.'....._1_.............
/
'-- !
'..,' 'J--,
~ M;-"'j
-.--C.,
..... '----.
/
/
I
"
,Ii
',. ~.t'
.\' .,.'
.-....
...
..-
_.........._......._...._......n'
..-... ..... ..__..~.. - -- ''-.-''
~- _...~-.....,_.. ---_.-
.......-. -....--....-.,..,..-
- --, - .-...- ............--
... - ...- ............-""'.-..-
--............ -....-......-...-
--........-.
','
-,-
'11_1'
--..
-..........-....---
....- .....-..-- --.-.,..
:"..':'':''';.:'~...'':'"::;.,.-:::=::;",....';.=
- ". ....-............-.... "-,,,~, .......
_.... ._. '_"_~"""_"'O"
...-............. -
-... -..............-.---" '"
"_n' _.. ...._.. _ _ ,.."..... to.
..,..........."...---..-........."..
,,_ _...._.._ ........, _..t_,_
"'--'- ........-..,........,-,....--.
......-....
/
t~
~~':~::'. .~;.
~"'. ,"
':. ~}~
'11,"
--.
-..---.,..-
....-........
__t:l:.lI.
~ 6"-..0.._4/.....,...0'
"_"W~_ w.' '.'_'
.-.-.........".....
_..---..... =:::::..
tUtl
":"'~....
........
....._..,
", ..
~_::-M~
....-.::0.-
..... ..-.....--..-.
13-129
.-,
..... ........
_-"."'_'I_'~!L..
00....
......-.
.........n._1t
NO. I
VISTA
..... I........ "_' I.......... 01
....----
---0(1...
.......-.--
,
., .
." I
I I
~__~I
-n
''1
~ "
cAse
OPEN SPACE
OF THE CITY
DISTRICT NO.
OF CHULA
II
VISTA
~;.::.;;.....? :
:,~_:J#'~;.7 :"t.;,.~"~.o::;'-#~'~ E:~:/qp~:1~;,..;~'r,";.~ ~~.: i#:.-"-..'Jr~
~'U$ P.Ii',-,il.\' "'cce~$
.--.;\
(\ -. - ~'fY.~'\
\~\ . \: ..
\. "
.f::"''-''=-''-
. ", /I.~ \,~.
- / ':'-;:"YX2y,..
r.lJ', ...." I-;!
I" .- ., J '.
. >;..
-, V.....y" -. /.
.r" -.. /-.,
:. ..(: -:~~..
--::'-'-/~p;:
~.. i /V;. .';,....-... .
; :' j:\'o _, - ,"
--kJ' J~'
..,~
- ~\
u,/Y/r . \ \ ..
'-', ./11"-' ,Y "
. I . 1,.1
c,
0; ~ <#
,.~;..,..
.. ~~ I
'l "
. ..
(~!
'~'\~I.' ~~
;;1.1 ..
" l~: ,.,
'" i: ~ "
;: i~l2...
s'
" :; \
r.;~
,
~
,
.' '"
.ol.~'t-,., ~
N' ~ ~
zn ~
.
Il~
"
"
"
..
"
,
f.....
., ! ~
CI-/
m
r--;;
.u'i
I ~
,
i
H
'.
"E4_
H
,j" " "~,,,.,4:_
"
I QY"'
~,r
I'
.: ,t..~'
>....
LEGENO
_.._D,.lrlcl 6
:()pen Spl
,. A~H.'/f't~,.,
!SutJCn"'$'O,
4r,J$ "01
",'
AP"1I0v~D lit" rN~ &.vv,," VISTA c::..y
l."Qt/N'Cll .YRE$OI.uTICNN~...:!S!.&.-OA.EO ~..'. .-.J
olIVO "IL#/? A,. T~E COVNry I1ECCIOEfiI ;;'1l,
&JeT ~~. '~7' '/~r. 'Af(1f _""" '7.1 ':y,'~"$
D4411~..Jt" &NULA VISTA ADD4D 1'0 QtSTJ1/cr
.Y 1145DLVTII1A/ NO. 716/ DATED 4-23'U
/./2 ,ot::4~
".
.l/
J
'." ..,y
..
r ;
..
"
""
.
"j.-c
,.f ,"" _. ~___
. .-; - \
,. -~'I.- .
-- ... ~ - ~.
___ '. i
, ,...
, .'
. ,
,,-\
I
--
,
,.
t"
-'---
".;.. .
=Yl :i
I ..:.':.. .-- ~:;-..t
I '-'"
<
.VlI.II'.::rIlIClT}('!',
.'1."11',':,1'). on
0'1..."1: !1l'.\(' ~.'I""::I:\'l;(1 ,\!a~1 D1.~"Illl'fIfl\."
n~:l1':'I(l-:
:;:;:;:~:~:~:~:;:
N~J~t:: .
.-"". ...'"
~~.
N.\.v,
~.,.v.
.\,..".. "~Il:d",n., to"""",,,, '1T...:<1"" ","'lOr.' :,;,,,,,.~
I" 1'1'~,..1 ""'",, "hl"lI,,", :O"'! ,,,.~ ~-t>.,J I 10' k.'" ....;
/".':o~ """1...11,, "11'. P.'~k, "..I ~"."'..'(I"" I."....'..~
"."..1.. :"', ""'''"~,r,d:o,,, 1'1:.." ."".....1.. "trJ "1"."_..
..".."'.....(.."..i'"....I"hj'~.'"I:l""".:, .\1\'.:"'...
.." 1:;1 It. "",.....1 .\'h l'la"....1 ~.''''U>U ",...,.,... "", .'
1....."I'..""I;III<lL.,.,"''' ,,, 1,,111 ,,,,..,.,,..,,..11:"",:11.
...",.11 L"'''.''''' ........"'. t....Il,,:. "".,11 I., ~'" """_".,r'
''''''''''''':0."11'''''''1<.,,,.1,,,,,,.,,.....,..,. .\111....".":
1" "".., "",:i "'~'h' ,,, \1;1'" """.
1,,,," .or,,, ""'I' :"a.u",,' 'IT''-';:'','' ,......,....... ,\::
1"""'''''''''' ,,' ~,,',..>r. :i :I,~'h' l(. O=>.. :IT'<....
"........ "",,,",,.,, ,.....,""..,1 .IT,;I""" ""...1'.... 'nnl:dl~
..lall''''"''I'I'I<h,.....!..";,,,,I..lrnll''''''liIT'',",,,,"I.,ll
1. ~';'I ~..., .,.... ,.. ...."",.,,) m' I'.,"k.. "",-, I:..,....., ,..,
11""""T, 1.,,<1.. ;,",. ,,,,,..,,,,.,.,,1 ":"~I~ I...,l~ 11"'. ".
"'MI "T:.........) ..., ..."'''",''",....' ~1I" "rt,.'~,,1 h''tl''......t:!.d
~,,~. Th" """" ,.. h' ""Tt"", h< ..Jlh,. '.'':'',a'','",
"'T 1\111 hd,;'T.... I"'"q.."",~ ,,; ~,,'lll'" 2,.n ",...
...( :I:";'. ,,, 'I".. aT"~.
.\T"" "'''1'''~',,~ ,,,..,...,,,,,..,, "T t,.......T:'T'. ,~..,;:", ,,'n
......."r.. ;~ """,Tal,...., "';",,"" I:m" :,,1lI ",[,0.0. .It!.
'T""::....." ;,1.,1\\ '.....IIC. ~,..tI .",.'.r....1 ,n ,p._
.''''',''' ." ,I."."", I" 1'.,~~~ .."'I P.,'r,,,, ,,'r, :',r" , 'r
"." ,., ,.",.....:: (1...... .... ''''''. ..,,,. ""''''''' ,,' n:",,,,,
I... ~ (..;, ,,,.... ''''''' '~l"ft' .,' r.", "'ft ...:<' ".
,."","!,.".,."..",.,., .
\r, ,<, p' c ',.,.''''''''.,',,: ~"':LC,.1 0',." "'''''1'.. .'..;: I.
,-I",..",' ,!oi,,"" '~"I,'"'ft., ,.", r . :,.."""
"': ""',,... )~., ;'-. ','''''. ;"," ". ,'..!,\!.."'fri ". ~. ,.,: :,"
ll.r"':.'''"'''"'''",'''...''rT,"I..,..r."..t",-''j,,,,,,,,,
". "or.: "', ,t. r.,.,., , '" ;"r" . ' ~',.I.,.." ~- ~ ~ <>
"",."".
r....-....
.
,.. :.-
t
L
,
--"7
--
-
--
--
--
---
-
.....~..s
~ ~~~
i l'i!l;lil ' i:W11 giil~ HHi
I' !1~1"'" !, '''';;1 Hi'" ";"
11!llWIJ It !!lml. WH I:.jj
11.1.,,,.,, ,. !"'Hi .q'i!; ".,
"I illii!Jm 11 WWH Ill!11! i ;j
I tfl,ihf_,., I~ 'Php. ~:,IHU.i ~ o.
I IE.. ~.. : J l ~i...~.. <~.
~. I iJ!..u.~ -
"if!
.. .
~' 1.1 ~::::: ~ Ii'
f.;1 ~..... , .
~::::
I! v::,: ;
~: -
,
.
4'
~
,.
.t
,
~
, I, I
" . !'Ii
. . I:~, ,
; I i.' !
! il !~! I,
i\ 1111iR.,
n ,'I.,
;! l~ lIim
I"
~!
, I
.
HI
ill
I ~:
'.
I
-I
II
I
III
5
~~
']:~
!7
~
Cl
iJ
It"
f
I
. Ia>
Ii
.
..
,i
w.
.,'
~.l
!
"..!., -.:' '<
,llli;jlji . .,:.
_# lii!l!!!!!!,'
.1:3 ':11
y#~ g~}
~...~,.....
~
-/0 r
I.
.. :.. to
, .--.
~ ;:t 1 .
.. .
I .
: i
.
. c
i..t;
Id>
...
i.. ~
c~'"
. "
.
-"
> 15 I!;
~~....
I to
w u
;E~
: ~
w
~i
1~!
i1'
i.1
i:.j f
'I~ I
I I
I l
~ ~ ! I
i ~ I
. . ,
'! I
,
: i:~
~ ; I
, ,
1 j
l ~
.
; I .
i ~ }
=! E
'i
,I
~
; Clo.
. ~.
~ i ~ . ~
lo. ! ~ t I:>
lito.. ":'11
, .
: i
.
. ..
i.;
i~>
, ..
i... 5
!,!,.
4j!:U
=8,,-
.. 0
.~..
-'1-
r..u
v
.~~
oel-
.. ~
~
v
~ 0 I
~ ,I
~. ~.
i:
.:1'
.. ....
. H~
l: I
~ !
n
i
.. . ;
\ II
,;.. !
~ ~ !
E !~!
-- -.
-'-!: --
....~
;;~ -/0 I
I
I
-.:
\I!II '. .
:i ~)
.
:-'1.II'f'~
.......
!,;1!~1
. 'f~l!
~,: ~I
, . JI,;.
".".,
.1.11,
mil
113}'
.st.. I
l:ia I
#HiJ
rll
~~ooff"
'l'~ y
..,-
~~
,(\9
~
~
(E)
.
"" t
"G>
0 ",,'
0 ;r. o .
'" ~
~
'co @ '\.
\ " -,~
"' 2
.. ... @'l
't/; ~ <f
O'
i, ~ o'
'"
..
(;)
c. ..~
~ u_ 0
."-l - t
(1)
,
to, . ,/:.~,
:1" ..: ,n' ~^
q / "/W''', ,A c'-~
."C / . St_.. ~ ~
,.1. . ~ ~".",v:., "" , '
~20 ~~ / V
'tI: j!" ~Al?}l4"
"",g ..,0 /
~o;//
./
, /
,
.ll
. '
H.,s
... i-
III .
'" (&)-
.- ..t;
o .-
m f
..@
~ i~
.... tlr\.
".~.
""
~"'Ir
. J"; /- I&Z
I. (f: Zf It or 167
""'16t IE' W fA'?
_. ??I."t 'Z i
_, 01 ~ i, Z
n-.s 01-8
-,
In) J. I.\!N 010 )C1C
, S3DNVH:>
'0f 6I.-~{-~
I
~
.N-~6F
;), (, '-/0 ,
.~~-.
.
I
"
I
I
.
'i
~
!5
I
III
!oJ
,~
t-
III
!oJ
III
'"
o
~
~
Z
o
II)
b
..
...
Cl
II.
~
"
@.
1
. .
..
~
~
- .
.
r
..
:: ~
i !I
'. (
. !
I i
<< !
P
u ~
f
t
(.
,'-'
f
!;r~ :=:
I _'4.~' IMIW.. fOIt AI$(.5.1I1' f'VllfIO$lS ...,
'''~'__'',,, .J.
I,;'
.~~~>) .' .
I . _
,
'~.
,..i1~~
i' ,
t' "
.~
1!',
',,{
<.'
<.,
)
...:t tJ
-, ~
,
,
"-
"-
'<\~
\..
'.
: '-!
,.
".'. . 'q
'j.'\ ..'
,
. .,'.
.
" '.~,;'\, . l:,"...;' ,,:.;..
;;93~33:..~, '''';'''
.', . '.
. '''',h-'Z\.,'(,J,
,. -;. ,f ~ 100. ,~'~~
@:.' i:~':,I:,<:1;'
~ ~~" . ::.. .'..\
I . ~ '. l,
-~ O~~
;> ~.i I'~
. f~' t~'9 ,...
, '",~_.. fl "'~
. \1'~ ,,,. ....,.o~.
S' ___. ,-
. ~~
'.'
..
" . ,~,; ..;~ ..
"
,.
'.
@
I~
"
,.
.:' ,
~
. - em .....
',.~
..
'.1:
..-
~
SHT I
:.' 1
, .
'.1
'''1
",.
': j :
. ~ 1', j
. ,', '..
@
, .
"
'",. ., "."
o
I, .~ } ;.'~':~':"'~:1'
MESITA , . ,t \t.:":"~;.,::;.:t',!
'. .' .". J I:,!~'~..;':~:,;..:J'
MAP 88. 33 - BONITA RIDGE ESTAT. ES WIT NO. ~."- ..... ,.;!',,:: ,;' :'i(:
MAP 166 (M815) -.RANCHO DE LA ~1t>N-.~ ....~.~ ::\"";j'-,
- .'. '. . " i ;,-': .:;?d~i;;\/;~~'r:'-';
t ..oJ ,--", ." .' ,,' ~~''':;.JF..:t.Lt.......''''
, ... ~..._, _.....~ -_. .. ,
~',..u. PROJECT
, ,
'\~ '....
~r"c'~"
~,
'.
JUI'-!.;: _
.....-;rr
.
~,
'I~
.
,
OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NO.5
OF THE city OF CHULA VISTA
DESCRIPTIDIl
A PORTION OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF QUARTER SECTION 70 AND
Tit( ~IOP:TH'IIEST QUARTEf( OF QU",RTtIi SECTH1.l 69 (If THE RA:JCHO DE LA IIACIO:j. IX THE CITY OF CHliLA VISTA. COC;lTY
Of SAN DIEGO. STATE Of CILlFCRr.IA. ACC~P;:11I6 TO W THE"" 110, 166 llAlE BY I1lRRILL t1!l FILE III THE OfTICE
Of THE C'JiJITY RECORllER OF SAIO SAI, DIEGO cOIIm.
~
I
I>'"vr
---
-...........--
-...-........
",
,tDT Y
,
/
..
..
H
--
OJ
..
..
M1
..
..
"...-LDr aN
DAv",
,_LDr -,-
i
,,_LgT ...
I
,-tOT .1"
LOT A" 11 202 Ac
LOT e - I "60Ae:
Total-12.662 Ac
".,)"\ "I'.U' ""\1'_-:1:.\\11 .\'!: \ :" 'T1:l1"rJ'r.~
I:~_\ '1'1.
1.:~_\ :"!:;-:-ll !n,-]~;
':,,!,~ ". ,,(":''".-l'-';
:;:::::::::::::::
.:...............
I.., .,~ '-',r1.,:n",,- .. """~ "' ""'I,~,t ,'.' "'~l<"" pl""',d
. . .:" "lroJ 1-' ,,'pl' _ ~',,~,I... .''''~ ,,'.... ..!'i,: I t.. "'1" ." 1.1
"'. .,_ ,...",;,...1 ,,, ell' I"rl.~ ;,,~I 1<,,'r",'I"~\ !1o""'I,,r.
.". ;,~. '-""''''''''0<1 ,,~ ,'Loll! Nll.TJ;,1~:UIll L:r-.,~_
..', ,,,,,.:~t'f1t ~"I' ....",',; ''''''<i J"1~nl ,It, .\n,- "n"
"". :.:: I' ,,~.,....,I ""h ":.",,,.,, ......."'<l ,.."...~ an' I"
1..,....'l;:;'..i ",>.! c'''''''' 1" ":Ii, ..,,,...,,r"..lIu"'~tllo'
""'-.,1 ~"".'.,,,,, "'.,,,'n. :'",1"", ><l~dl to. a~ ...,',_,n
." .'n"'" ~", IT ..,,,,"',,....1 "~.,,r:,...... .\111"",'j.,,_
:r <','T ,.... 2 :",:,h '" l~.,~ an...
i..:.>,;,~:~.~;.,,"t
}~~D "';.~,~:
; ."." ......" ~.,'!' .",\Or."';'- "Tl"~" 1'11'1 ""~"",,,. ,Ul
.~,,' ,.j,...,. ,.' '"., '''" :! "l'rl\' 1(. Ih'~ ,....".
VICINITY MAP
ilia 5t:A..~
~
'~';';;,:~:~~i:'\,,~:;;,.;:.;-:;t~~~ ;:;:;;'~:;.;::.. -:~:i'~. ::~ t ~~:;
.;'''1 ...'<1 ~ ". ,. :.. ...,-"",,\ ,~. J~'r"" "".1 ro. .:"::11'"''
,.",~. :';",1. "". "'"~l'" nd J":"n'" I" ,1.1 r It...,.,.
'''~! .,r.,,...-l,, t .....~'~I.....I ."l'. ',rl:!j",,1 1I',",___O'!,d
..,'x. T1~' In" '" I.. 1" ",,,nu,,, "',dlm' ,.......'''11...
'p,,',;!1 1..1.;",,-,. "","'I~I",,,..,I1'<..th...2'IO~...
..'!":'!'1\.1"'1"."....,'..
.
\,..."'~ "'Ilt:O;""1lI !......",...., "" If""","''''' 1""":':11'''''
,,~,,~ In r.;:~"n\ "!'''' ",..".,- "1'.1.. :"... ~I",._ ~"11
"',!,,,.,, '''~ ":.,e.l '.......lh. ~......I "10.>,,.,...,,, ,r \ I" ....'
.". _,. ,,~ ,1\,,,',,'<1 I". l~,,,k' ~nd ~"''''''lkn l'ie<<''',,,
,",'I I.' ".'l<"~'; '2 t,..... ,.... ""'r. !"':l\" .....'''l n' <'\'tll....
",'~ ,,, (\ > I,'~.. '...."-,~""'~,,~ ,~,,'l1nr. :,>.10 ",
, ...,;, u' ,.,,~ ,,"'J
N.\.C.
11'.'''' ,,' ......'~lL...,RI "',II'''.!! '~.11 .......r.. ~!:.'l111.'
":'''''[1." ,~"r'" ,,,0'1,1(1\,,.' 1>;1 ...., !""11<<1 ,,, l""
. :;.....,~,.: l~,'.:'.... l'''"... "",,,". ,'a","""m ,.,. ...t..l1k
,;,...:<00 ""<I'''''' phnl ml....':>1 ..",11 3~ t"I......<I
L' "'"'.LI "'<i. ''T>~.,,,,,,,,... "f ,,",,: ,.., :.:t;> do' ..'~ .."',;,
AI. 11 -eJ.
OIRfeTOfIOf MLlC WORKS
~ ~a?J
OIRfCTOfIOf PARKS. RECREATION
~(,,-III
.
J'. PO-7S'
,",TE
8- 2o-~
:lATE
OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NO. VI OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
NlLl'''''' Jll!f1lM
NIt;N.$rNlJtll.
STI1UT
~
.
.
) ..
,. ~
l' ...
~
~
III
~
l!
~
,
.......
"
QJ
lEBEND
--- DISTRICT BDUNDARY
OK. "Ad TO I( MArNTAINED
In AS5ESSMlNT 'tUWMAS
i
If]
~
.
.\'0_\ 1I'~.TIII{",rrllr;
!~\..2!..__ (111
:~:;:~:;:~:;:~:~:
.
~'Pi~r~~}]
~.
APPROVAL
APPAMO I., TNt (HUlA VISTA CITY COUNCIL BY
RESOlUTION NO. 7984 .DATED: 12-Z'-7~
AND rUD AT r.... COUNTY R[CORDER ON JAN. ~.
197~ . F1UjPA6E NO. 110 -003/95
t-l.I.c.
DIA{t:~ ~Y;OAkS
~""-l .71/ f~..J
DIRECTOR or PARMS C RECRUTW)N
i"r'~
['HI) :,~",,;:' .
~~'-\l't212!"~'~~.....:~~l.!!ZllIl"'I'~
I"R~:lI'fIO';
.\I"'~ ....':oh'h.' '_ftl,,,,.1I Inh~l'"'' ~~~"_l'l~nl..l
III ~"~".l ""',"r. >J....~... "",I 'n~... ,,",II h. 10"1 ...d
h.... ,,~ "'"'\lHI I.. flu' I~,,'''''' "nil .....n ," I.... lhn"'''t.
"...... "'~. ".'''I...nd a"',.,,,", ."..rl""'"I1lll-'''''''''''
....1 ....~I...l'..1 .'llb '<;1:01'11....... "."~ll"':. ,\01.' "n"
It,,' lilli,' .....,...... _I.I! I......".. .,........ ,,~.,"" II..... It.
I.. "'1,1,,,...., 1I11d ~....." It, 'Ul to- ,.....,. "...." d"rln;' II..
","",I .:n"I..: ..",..... t,..lI";' >J,,11 b,~" "'..'....."n
I" r"'''''''' ",dl ...'''101'....... "l~.,'r.'...... III 1'""t~I'...
'n .......1'.. ::! "I"I~' I.. ,hi.. :t,.,o,.
"... ....., "llh :""J...l<- IrTl~~.. i... ..~..,._. ,\11
1.....I..I._.'r~...1I"1l2101"1'.... thlllll....".
.\...".. ,...",t",... ''''IT"...." hTb, h... ....~""' I"to lal h
..1""''''.lIhm.''"-..I..", ",..I ~........",.I ,....... -.l,,1l
1.- lot,,, ....1\ .......... ...."'h.<I I... ,~..""" "..1"'.-,.,,,,...,
m.......... t....... ",..........'..."01 1"'"'''' I,'ld tl...,,,.
,,,.,,:10'........1 ""1 .......t""". "lIh""kl....1 .............<10..
'",.. Tho, I"'.." I.. ,....01",,,,,, h."lth! ....''tn'h,.
'n.. 10111 ..,ltli...... .........1..1."'.. ,,' So,'lI,..., In It..,.
...'''1''1'...'101..''......
I...".. ...""'nl.... 1...,..,'....1 ,... "......".,.- lrri"""10..
......,._ '1I11"'"ml.,."""...., I,,,..,,,,,,, ~..,.....,.II
IIIllh..........I"nl,.....'h. ..../,,1.........1'''.1.....
"n,,'" ....di....,I<.. I,,' .._"..... ,,"" P....n'" I.... "j....'.....
.... I.. ........,,:1 1'....... ...,. ,n'...~" ..",~I~,.., <'11111.....
I,.'k ,,,IT' "kh. ,,...'j...._,,r!',..tl....:o.llI.h
"'1111"1""'1"1..,,..,,.
,\...".. "r ...,-I....I'~.I." """,,,.1 .,.." ""...,. 'Inll 10'
"~,,,...h.j .~b"", .......11... 10" ,.'. ,.......... ,.> II.'
'..11,.',10." .t".I.",. ""''''. '''1''''. .."n....n..... ...,.,,111<
I,.,~ ~..I.."'I.."...,l:Inl...I....bl _'ha.. I...flh......
n~ n.~'I..... 1'1...-,..1._ ,,' s.~, II.. ::-10'" ,.'. ~"'"
'..lhj~ ".....
-
",,-
sc..,. 1~.600'
OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NO.7
OF .THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
HSCIlIPTIOll
111"'.1'01"'" Df OUUfU Sltflllll II 0' '..tIlO Dl U 'lit till III '"I tIn I' tIIUU "SlI 'lilt ""flllll III" SlICI.. is
wmlllt ."1lI0 'HI ASFllU 111'"1 OfFltl OF fill tlIl1l""Cll'DlIOF S" 11111I tllUll" IlSGI(IIICUIII'" III
11'110 IMOa IllIa llllITIl" .., 110 M05 " Till tin af tllUll tiS" COUIIn OF SIM 11110 STITI OF tlLIJOtIIlI'
'CCOIOIII' TO '"l "'5 '"EllfF "LIa III '"I OffiCI af 'Ill COUll" 'ICOIOIIO' SlllllEIlICOUIIn SUfflf ClLI'OllllII llCEPT
LIT U IS SMnl III lIlIlTlI I~ OF SlID"" lID '''01 IS ltEctlDII III SIlO CCIUIln
~
"
<-
7
l'>
~
10
II
If
,~
:1
.
>
.
2
.
>
.
.
~
-~"T"'IW
4A~
if,
,VI
'~~_I r'~~:';'lllCnlrr~
,:;;:\....... lTH
(~n ~l'.\l' '~\I:'-:1::I':Q....\'U.\ 1~.~'CTln'!'r'l\<;
',)...~J'''rlfl'i
VICINlry MAP
-......
:;:;:;:~:;:;:~:~:
}.l.l;iQ.
""""t"W'!;
~~~
tJ.I.C.
~.I.C.
.1," ,'~ . "nl" ,,,,,,.; h ""n"'''' 'rr,:c,l l"n ~,~""", pl."",..!
,n C:'"''''''' I.......r, ~,,',J,... "",I n.".... ~I.dl I.' "'1" ."..!
:"" ,,- c,.",,,.,,, hI C,,' I'".~, ,,'wI I~,'''''", ,,," 1l,""'lUr.
~'.d~ ,,", "~'~".'T'" ,'~ !'i,"" t"".r,.d~ ,".I "r:'~......
".t ,,,,,,,~,,,,, .,,11 '~''''''l,I.,1 "Lon, ",: .Im' .'......
".., It<' I"~ "',,,'r." ".'h pL..m..' "r,,,,..J "...,.,.~ "t<' ",
I.. T'"''''""" .".1 ""'O,, ,,' ",I', '''''.r .,c,." ,Inri'" Ih.
<','r,>! ,""".,,,., ......'...'n. ~.",I'n:' ......'11 I..:o~ ",,"~...'n'
..11 "'''''''''T..t "'~'''r......... .\1] pn1\"~"_
'n ~..,' .'", ~ ....,'11 ,.. 'r.l~ a"""
I""" ..r." ~'J Ir ;""'''''':'' ,rrlc'", "", ~,...t'..... ,\11
,,,..hl'.n~ ,,' ~"'l""':! ",~\II' \<. Ih'.. ~r.".
I... " ".nl"''':'',' 'W'...,,,,ll ,r,.,,,' ,,~, .."~"",,, '"'' la) h
I _I.';::: ~' ; ;'::: !,\;~'~ ':;',' ~, ~ ,',~ r:';:\ .~I1~::::;;,,":,~~,l r:: :';"'" ~I,~~\ 1~
'",....".t. ....<I~ ".... ".11"'''. r,,1 ,'I:on'~ "',101 I lo.",.~
.,,~ .'T.,~...."') "., ,'''n",~'"" """ T"'In.,1 hd,"_""<!
-'''. ~'r,' ,n""1 ,. ", '_"nl:l'" ~,' ::1"" ""J'"' "'r1
"'r "'II I.d,:,,,,,. ]....', ,..,,,"~ ..I !""'l,'n :! .n ...~
""";1'I)l"""..:or,a,
\r",.. "'n\;"I1'I1~ fit "",n,,,, nr l'rn'T:Or>' Irr'~;.' 'ton
,. ~'.r:-- '11 """..11 ,,,. n "'''' ,. 1::t.oI~ .,"'1 ~I,.,"_ ",'h
',..Ile.....,..,'.'..' ,......\1,. t...l::'''''r>'II' '., II'.....
", ,'~ ". <]'''''',,1 ,~ I'.,r~... and ~"...."{,..,, P,r'. l""
,., . """. ~ I'...... ,..,. "'-.IC. "".". ,.....~,..t ,.' ,."" I...,
. 1" r. ,,,.~, ,....'" ~ " "''' "f ""., ,.." :!_ ~ 0 <: .
c. . ;" ". to. ,.,,~ """.'
b J ,~~ . () 4?.../. ~./
DIR[iTOR Of PuIl[!( 'DRKS
... . -: /t)- /9- 7&,
.. ~~TE
~
.
L.~-,~
DIRECTOR OF PARKS &' RECREo.TlON
"~:"/'f-7'
:>ATE
". .,~ ,.' "'n_,,.r"_~I,,1 n'",r." ,.,.." _,,",' _, ,!' I.
.:>to ,., 'I' ",..~ ,,,. ";01,,,,. '__;t ..." : ," :"" .
.... :"';~:.:; ~",,~",:,~'" "n1 -..I, T ""
"..",..,1. ,.,.." ,~; ,,~, I .'" .
'.,t....
....I..;,'.n
,..... .,~ ,
,,,_",'.1
;';.
",,1
~ (, - 1/..3
_... ...,............._-
J J, I
. I" i'l 11,-', I tll" ' hil '
I!;'!;I:I;! 'j' !l!l!j'!lj II/Jill!)i1l
II,!,!;!!!! J,l ~il.'.ili _Ill lit: Illill:
!'I[lll-'-,'I' 1'[ '!Iihh. 'I' I'i" , I' '
. Hq' . r= 11.._- .:'...
'","ijlll! II =,'!:" 1.'!,:!!li Illtllll 11,1,"
f ;j.,:.. f-!. - I ~ i ... (;!il' - -" J. I" I' ..
l!,i~'~dJt~ ~~~,: ~~::~~:i .!~ !fI,'.s ;!l~i
i'!tj!~~!t!t i~;~ i~!I':I;t(':i!1 1!li1:i :ii.IJ
'..I'I-,--!-', ,- 1'111"1-111
U,~.i.H~u ~h!' hl~ll!iiJ U .. I I .1
Q) j!
In
i :>
~ ~
u 5
~ 0
In 10.
is 0
.... >-
u ~
if (j
In ....
Z ~
....
a.. 10.
o 0
...
.
*
"
""
I
I
I
s::::
'.':.::
~$~
~-:~
"
j I j
!II
I
~
!!I
...
or.
a.1
t.~.
!~;
:~I
tri
hie
0..
E~5 .....
...z Z
:i'~ ':J
. .
ji=
.a.
~:~
.~.
~,~
fa.
..~
afa
:11
i~!
i~~u
:= ,
;j 5
n: ;;:
i
""'I
~
z
iii
o
II:
H:',~, .
uil! ,
0..81:. I
o
:z:
<J
Z
C
II:
~
........ -
::::: J
;s~~s;
...............
~
~
;;
~
.
0
. !
I .
; .
.
. I .
. a i
o . j
! .
. . I
I ~ o .
. . . . i
a a
. . = ~
. 0 I!i .
I 5 i
'gj @i I
:J (p -II ~
. :
';
t r:::
d
~ rk
I
J ,1
'.
51 j
d~
I! .
s:! I.
a. .:
= I
; !I
iili!
!I"i
~~ =-
p;
~Ji
-
--
Ir
/
.iNLMZ
,.z
CITY OF CHULA' VISTA OPEN SPACE DlSTRtCT No. 9
ASSESSMENT ~AGRAM
LOT"
LDUI
leT C
LDTD
/DTS
<,"H
~rl
iL&tIJ lU5CAJPT,f,aN
AMToOWI' DT tiJtAtIII7W.II ~ llP:f
. .. _ or ArMcMt &III LIt MlIt"IDN, ,IN
_~17Y tlilTCMIItJ .-r.(C1::IiM'J'J'tIIr.."tIWItSD.
=-..J_~~~~#,~
~tJlTSM~tIlIf,W7Y."""H.IH'.
,
...
'"
~
~
~), .
~.
'S~
.(~,
/N$T#KT I(JUNiII',w
(JM"N$II1KF0iE
Ml#lNMI/IIED \
{",,__r N<MNH \
<<IT AIlIMNjg
\
\
\
\
\
I
I
I s ~
I i I
Ii'
I ,"
I I;
'~AC'
!So, AC
f~6? .tIC
OU AC
,. 70 AC'
O"AC
I.StJAC
---
--
----.......---
..__.__.__u..__
_"_.("'___._01.__
____.IM......'.__
----....-.-........ --
_'..11._....___....
oo_....___..u.___....
--..-. -,..-.,....-.
.._.....11__. &ll__
.-.-.-......-.
__..._.........__. All
_ef...._._........_
_____ ,......___ .......11.
_...._____._. -.0,
..---..-.......--....-.-
__. ____.,....'.....11_..
--,----............-
_. - ,.... I... __... -..... _.._
... .,n ........ __.1.......'0_
--,..--.
-_.._-_.~...._.-
_....___.__u_....
-.~_.. -....-....-
_... ...-t.... _ _ __'_ ~,......
-._1.___....-....,-....
....... ..... _'._.'~'_H"_
--.....-.
_.. _,......... .....1_ _ _II.
._.1 _,. ..,....., _ I..... ...o.
"II...., ......, _ _. _"-..1'"
.- --- -.--.., -.. -'-
__....., -._.,_._3.'~.__"
.....-.
,.-- "',.~
AIfIWO",." 6" T~ ~ """4
c.YrI'~... IY ~8TION "w.
....... ~/}~
AND Tll ED A7 C'OUII/," MC'ORDtl"1t ON
ocrDMlla /!" ",,/IIIilFNa77-44?Z&S
TOT"<
M. 41 AC
ll7ti~~
i's.:;'-...:~!
..~
W.I.C.
I
I
I
-
~: rJ <?'Z"'~ _ /'-/1-7T
/JI1t<<1t:m '" PU61N:' WClt1J6 &UTI
,f;... ,_ w&.LR
4""<<TOA '" MIfItS ~ A.f(:1f'ATIQN
-
'D-'~'17
"'''
lIS
.
.'
,
~
t
elk
/
SHEET
OF 3
OPEN SPACE DISTRICT NO. 10
OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
(PHASE t)
Abosec
I
,
O~es:sp( .:;;
1-,,-- k.
DESCRIPTION
AI\IlIIlII(JJ,[ I6T iRf(J _lEIJIOII{l. iI1IIIfAST IJJlI1ER (J tb1IIEJ> lEIJJ(/l fil. MCllE rorrofAST QlAAlEJI'1!
URJlJl mllJt 6lllJ nt: IWIHlIE LA "'ICR. IN 'DE. CITY (f QUA VlSfA. m..MY (f 5M DlUlI, STAlE (f :;;.uFA;lA.
IllIRIIIG rolfi' 1IfIllI' 1II.li6IWt:IlYIUllIlL. iIlFIl.E IR 11t'tlflC[ (J 11( aum;((llllR(J lAID IA:IDIEJl) .:u.n.
-----=,,~
~ llP>1tr ~U!'~ro:A.'<<T A1FA. DE:S::!l.~I'!~
.w.A~cn1l'f,;
,.,....:1:) t'7'Ir
W. ..-t":a'
"0" 00 00
0:':';... ..
. ~(\f{,~
,~~ J*1~~ ..
~
. .....
.
!'!:'\!"TtT'M~:
u.- COlIlt.jro.1...~t llTiJ:lIt101l~
"IMtfdj.l:n>WltI<:m......IN'utIt<Il"ll~
..ml1t....kf':'I\.wt;'n1f~M""""Ift'd~C1t,
T~lit.. .ncll..,.,....,.U(J:I "l1l"t'Clor. t..""'.,.
,,-(*"""d ar ..1....,' ..1m.b...:l ~
Nit c'eno"'.atl'lll ..'nt, ~ll""'" ~1allU..
NW lItUl .m 11,1111' t'O''fI'T'I:Il nth 1.1__ ~
cn\'l!TS.n.l~hc.l"t'nlaJlledUlll~torl,lll'
n~ a"-. Wrinr. tir _1 ~__,
~1Ill:_11bl'1l..~.tO~w.
we'll ""Illcuncl .~.....-. Ul """,1.1_ b
SlletlU121lf"_-1~'tt.tll1s_.
lawIl"""...t!lc...._Uc1\'Tt::::.t1all..,.!_.
t..-'1Ir..-h:I.:t.....Morr_........t"~t....ll
"""1",,",,1 a"'~"'(""". III P"VI'1aoi~ or s.cu..
:: 1aP'1" to 1~~", ,.,...,..
"'""'.. nent&l"t".., ~~. ir'Tl:'".l.~'t>:I~_
lJItt1".ll:.,t"~nl.-:ttl....~.,..1.'fUlll~
"""'t~,.....11bt<kt'I'T.......,.......M"""'u-.t
ho.,.....,...~.; _......n.... fI1....~.."r, ___
~I~ " ..~h /"'.ICII flCJOVN L~ rru-)
110' C"'It"',oot.... ..lth ,."..lrln:.l hm".-...lIlWl. '""
~I\t...n t.. tll ",!~l\In _It"" \_~lItlal for
~111~1l!1.".. ~IIIClll'lo.~tlon2-10
"F'J'l1>tllt""alll'.d~llIdlll1...._1IlIt
'o~"...-ct>cn.
..,....eo:1IUUltl!:!~('I't~~Uar.
ryr._ >11 UNI'III -"'..... 1... """ .l~
""h ""'1_ "lllllt ~h. l"'l'd .bn_, a
,,-- .,... .. dlZ'KHd Illr h,rU .... ~'lca
D1.ncUIrIlllt ~~ 2t"'.,..r,,,
_1ftotcutt_e.dIto"'b_.~
of $let. 2-10 do IIOC ..b ~ tau _.
~tlltlN'U'rr-.r......lI:_1n'1llat..c..-
~ ..,..:ro:l to. c1__ IIf _nil 1~1"'1'" bolt
IICt hlllatod ~1I ,.. flln~: bo,U_. _.
.....,.. ~ or ...,.111<. n_ """ *-1_
~l;u\t ",'r~l&;" _" .. ~1"""', "'-'1Sl_
ot 5cUClft 2-10 do...t apply tD IhU_.
-
-
-
IDIC
JDl'F
lUTM.
10.19& .-:rES
S.517.-:JfS
16.313 .-:rES
"A"
II
~
1"'~~' .~'''-;J.::r~
~1~_,,~ ';
~._' (a,,,, .......~
-"I'll. /"
-".//
;;
I
I
VICiNlTr MAP
.... S~"'~
~~ ~./.
DI <l! (J I\IlIC \IRS
/- ~"",-7.,
.A1[
..c...- ~
DIIlCTt)lCfMSII'f(i(AT!lJl
,- ::tGo -71'
:..~
......... ,"'I.'~
:::::::::::::~:::
\)
~
I
-
.......
~
,'...- ~.-;:
~ST
OISTRICT
BOUNOARY
~" .."
I'.OO~
"---1
it>>1J~~~Ji~~~~~;'
,j.:;,=,"?~..l"~ r ',~ ~"";"W~.>,
.:~~~(:f~(:.~~2;~~:;!f}}4
"..........\;~,:".:..,<..~.~ \..J.
.~j.'",~" ~'~":1 :"'j.!' '. .I1:!;' "
....f. il{'O<~I'" ..' .,,,t'
$...,...,yI.~.''i.-....:7..~l;;:
;{:~~i?~t~~~~;:r'
';l~"~h' :!l'..~~',.'t<>l' .tli";"r.
1;:.~:-~tA-.~.. .,~~.. ;"''.\,'l:~,!
.. ..f..OJ . ",~ 81" .~ ',...:'\.,'.
/\
It'
J:
, ,
'"
~
<"*-
".L
. .
OPEN SPACE
MAINTENANCE
NQ II OF
CITY OF CHUlA
VISTA
OnCRIPTIOH
..."'....-,......._c_........OC'
-......-....-...-..- .........oo
.._.....c.........c_c.................
-........-..,,-......."'............
_"r.._...<..,....."'."......,...~..
..._,..."OO.....G...,...........;..,...".
_.. ... .... M" ,'..... '..", '."". ".. ~'"''''''
...,...........,,,,,,."',...'.,.-..,.......
.... '~'" .... ......... ........... ......... """.
'''' ..~ ,.... .""". '1'.,.,' ...' '~I", 'U'. ...."".
_'M ........'.... ....'..'. ....~<< .~". "~H
.......1".......0.............<.*........
...............,.........:..........."...,.
............" f"..., '.. .~, .. '''0 ',""" f, ...
................-...".,............
........, '...... ....... ...~<..... ....... '1'"
......._.......O...~...,...'u.C... '"
..... ... .... ...... .....~ '''''''- ..... ....',
...,.......-.-.....-
"'1E1SOltS.>>~*I...tJ,1Mll
_ItOVIOOlU_III',""
"'.I.~utlCllllI'"
UGENO
~
rrrm
r::::=J
~
E==.3
L....C....O.llltI.AtI.
...tu.." U....C...ID
..tu.."
~~~~~~Il':: :~lIrho.~':.\~'
"".Ic:T SOUflDAU
Cl""''''IIlOt~
a__..IOOll....~
UK..... ..... 1OOll........-:1I
......... .... eOOI "'liCIt. ..,...
..... WIff"ITtflflI.,.,. LOT_.
~
e
(!)
...,..
.un
.....I.....~
;_,!:t.."...,....
........,~
" 4.L
Pc...........
.... EV-1It
CUT o. eHUlA ""'A .11.111....... DlMI""'" ...... ...
OPEN SPACE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. II 83-54
(6 THE CITY OF' CHULA VISTA ._
01...._
".,,-
-
"- .,....... ~..... '7';,'_-:1;01
~n.-~',N; ~ :~';.:.~
.......-.
".It.,
APPROVAL
APPROV[D BY TH[ CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCil BY
"(SOLUTION 1010.12329 DAT[D JAN. 14,1986
DESCRIPTION:
ALL OF THE lANDS lYING WITHIN !'HULA VISTA TRACT
NO. 81-" MAP NO 1120S R[conOED APRIL' 22, rtltS.
ASSESSORS MAP 8001( S94. PAGE 14 10CTOBER 14. "'"
_A.t. ~':~:;'l.::""'"
..:~ ;;:~'..:!'!:::~~._U3.'.!L~~
If''''''.....'''
:::::::::::::~:~:
:~~t.~;);~
~'i~
--.,,-~~
. not i~' Hisrmact
....",'.O..."O.D
-... -----
'-<-~"-~-"-'-
~(
")~
...- ~~'"'''' ...-. ,......"..--
..,......,........,-.--.-
_11....."'_......_,_......
.....-........."..........,...._-
"-'.....d...'..'........"'.........--.
........",...,............"-....,,..
.......""'."".._~...,_.~,...
:~~::::.~:~~=-::=:;.::~:'
-,,-,_..........~. ,,,_,,,.-10
.....,...~..,..........-
,_ ._.... ""_lI' ........,... __.
.....1.......,......_.......,..a.......~~_lI
;-::;~:~::,:'::; '"-''''-''''-1'''
..--.............-.........."..........
...".I1..,_......__~.. __
-.......-"........---........
..____,_1><__. _...
----.,....'''..........--,
-.....,..-...........,..,-.........
,..-,............-............-..;..
.",''',.,.. .......~"-..._._t.-1l
....,.....____....'a_.......
..--....-
--....--.-.......-
.....-...........- -,--.....-
.".,......-.......-...--,-....
.-..--........,.....---.....
:=::~..;"-:..::.,:-;::. ~.:.'::" .:;....".:,.=-
..-.......1/...._....."'...._.
-.......--...-..-.......--
___ _II'" .1_ G' ........ '"<1_....
.." '_I""~ _ '0"-'" _.... _
_.n""'-__o.I.1<._..._.....
.',,, -....,~..-.. ......-.--
... ._,,,,, ~-1l...... _'~""""_
OPEN SPACE
DISTRICT
MAINTENANCE
NO 14
A\so 5~c.
~"'-co:o~ "s -b k
E A S T L A It E
\
,
..'
N
-1i-
;'
I
I
--
...--;;.;~;...;,.._.....
.... 0'-015
lUll
~~.
0'''''. ..~
~.~':;r~
"'....:l"........
::l~~
.".,.......
0""._
"~'.-----
"~""-
(1fT 0' (HUlA YIITA ..IG'..IU................t!
-~"'!
.,~.. ,...~..~ u;,~~: I....'...'~. 0'
-~.<''''-
BONITA lONG CANYON. UNITS I" 2
010-"
...~, , .....
.
I
.......
"
~
.,.
....~
'"'~ 'hT ',,,.......,,,.1': ft"~mctll'fltNl
~
:::::::~:;:~:~:~:
:llt.~}~{
~~~
;0\ \,F;~ct
\'kll,jIIVI,'AP
-"'-""..,.,..-,..........--
.'.........-_.__._
_""__'_"~'_"C'"
..-.........."...."''''''.''''.-....
n...,_...h.'.....,-..,,__
"""""""",.",-""-.'''',.
...'._......,h'_......,__
......... ....,... ....1..'....... "".~,~ '"lJ,
_._.....'..'.._1_.._.....
_...,_ll.........-....,...,.......
-11_'......_.011_...'--..
"""......"""....,........
'-.... .... _It, ,........___
-".._"....---............"
_,......_............OU_.O'-oI...._
.-"...........
-.............-,..........--
1."""'.,.........._...__
_..-.,_11...__...-..........
.......___"...DI......... _....
.....,-.-. ,..... ,,--_.
--,......".""""...,-_.....
...................-"...-.......-
.Ill ...,.... _._.. _......"
.....,..........--......-....-
...----
_"-"'.__'__.Ica
--..-....,--.--.-
..."'''_.1_,,-.. _...._,..
.-..................----....
l>t....._......_..__.-.._
_,......."...'-<:0....'.... -.._
.........I-U.........'........_.
-.........-. -...-..........-
_._"'...1_............'.........
_l_...'n...^"..... _"........
___.._o.ll.J.<._..._._
.,.... ......,.----. _.,-
"'...."_1_11......._........._.
{,I"lmCl BOlJtlDARV.....
r;.
-,
BONlT A lONG CANYON UNIT 4
.
OPEN SPACE MAINTENANCE
DISTRICT NO, 15 OF
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
r
.1
!
.,
"
.
o
',,;/ "
;,"" .
"P:- .
jP .
.. y ..
" "
"M"__"''''''''~'' 1 ..
'" ,
" .I .
. ~ . !'
DISTRICT BOUNDARY_
MAP 9494 BONITA lONG CANYON UNIT 1
" ..
~ .
"
-
. " .
,
u ,
C .. I
" " i
., . ".11III ,"I-IIOT ,,' ,
....TOf" COIIT..CT? I
,'--- n ~
.. ..
"
. .. . I
,.'"
p'" ,"
.. o co? ,. ENCANfAOA 0
.. I
.. 1
.. . n n .. .. .. .. Sc..,~,..
~-
;;~:'~:~'.: --
~~;::;;--
--
---
:
'ft~l:::~:~ f
f"',"j'J
~ ,I?I:JY'
..--.... ..--.--
. .......
. .. ..:~;:::~
(~1 '~--.._.-
"
"-0
DISTRICT BOUNDARY
BONITA VISTA HIGH SCHOOl
APPfItMD
BY ~4' ">- ~/-
.
'UII
_o~,~..~ ...
WO MJ 0<;0'{,
City O' CMUlA ViStA lWG'WlU'MGDlil'll....IW'
.....1!J..
0'.:0:"-"__
s.o._'''.~
.n....~
"." ~ ,",;..,
.....".,.
""~
"n. ...,.,..
W...::.............Of
~ ~------
.
.,
BONITA HACIENDAS OPEN SPACE MAP
=..
".11..
...,..<...,....-...
.'.,.......
.....'..
.... JO'''O ..-so.
lJ
('
~
'"
~
IliJi\L I
!L:'!W!~ IIWI
:::"",,:_"_"00
~.......'*;~ ,::,~::,: ....:~::' 0" U - tJ
._.........<,..10........,.;.......... ....-
._ .__..;;.:.....,.:':.:;0... :~r.":.I.......
:: :i:! ~:::. t~"... :::-.';;'" .... -.'::.'1
~":~'. ~:;~. ~;.:- -:":~1':' ..:.~ ~~~.::: ....... ...
~:...~.~\.~~ :- '::;~~~\..;~~.::.:..::.:-:. 'i~r'
::.::.:-:.;1:111. ..:.:~:':::,::;'i. ''t''::'.r~'::' 0::.,,;;
:'''u,,~ 10 .." ,.:':""r :":.'!.". ....::...a .-.......
g~~::.~T~~.;~;.i:::.:;.;;,~..:;~.::..~~:.t:~\J;'
':':;..';'"....~~:~.::~ '.....'.1 '...., ~.!j,T .r.i: ;';~.-..
.... ::..::"" ..~-:; ~.........,::. ~"::.":."-":': :"~l
:-:::../IOooOO(.l..:.OI..'I!"r......I't:.,c,u..,..."'.:.:.......-
_~ .=....~':. ~~~,~~'.._=c:..~:.....'..-:-
-, ",:.::::.:" -:..-:-::
~ \""'/''';
----~\\-_._' ~
l. '. r.
" ......,...11)1. )-
~ _. AIIlll"1~' ,
ILIlcil..;;t..,;a;,D.
YlaNITY
. ool<.._M ll.P
_'~I~I~_,,!_~ -_.
-----
.!.'ii.
h
~
.~_:~..!L.
ATTACHMENT. A
..-....
OPI';N SIJM:" .
1)11;.."1' L MAIN'I'I'
'I'll 1 ,J weT N 'JNANC'ft'
'" CI'l'Y' 0 O. 17 0[" -..
[.' CU' I
> ULA VISTA
HAUCIIO UI::
MAP I.A 'IAL1ON
Nu. 166
UJ~IHI(;r u
. OtJNOAtt (
~
~L~
,-. IOU'
.
__~I ~
:-M".::-. j.,t
-"'..~ .-)'
CIIIIIA VIS ::..
NO 8u.~~ rA TRACT '--~u
MAP UUlT 0
NO. 10989
J
"
,
.,.....
"".'y;
JAt,lUA.ttU
4400 PALM T,!I5OH" A
LA "[:>1.., CA.AVl.-, SUlf[ eSSOC
_h T"~~!J'I:):l1l41
_ h!':1't!~" ~~?..:..044!)
-e!..~T-:"~ !L-:r.::a.:.Mi!&. -
____ __. .............._~l.:. -
," --..-
_ '1m
~
U_--I!L!ie!...,..-
--
..
-
..
-..
["'""
....:-1
BOUNDARY
APPROVAL
LtJiEt:lU
T
.,
,.
LAN05CAP<O
AHD NO' IIIttCA.TtD
OISlJlIItf IOUNOAIIY
.
36
._AIlIllOGt
. un NUWKlt
WtlO'4D IY tHE
IY Ilt5Cl.UT\ON NO. CHuLA "Sf A at( CCUfCL
_DA.TtD
.........,.,
..
---..---
CiTYClf
CHUlA ,"STA
OPk:N SPACE
. IIAINTENANCE
_....IloI"
DISTHICT NO. 17
.
...... "-III
.- ..
......
I' .'
oA"".o,D.
1~lu~~ ~
I , !! Hil. Ip ~'J -> ~
. . I I ~ ~ ~, 1 Ii - I. I I": I I a::
III11 J 5.' ~ I ! i ' ' ,~I ,... ~
I R I ~ F i I I' I ~ "w ''''':. I~ ~, ~ CiS
~ I I i S5I; ~HI. L ~"~' ~.Afl
I
f
I
I
I
I
r
j,
4
,
~d!! ;
tl" .
111-..J (~I :
i~W '
__. i~ c illl
1<0 bill
ta :J: f,
. >0 I
g<z I
.s<t I
loa: g
't::
.
1\
I u
"
,
"'
I .
!L
'. ,
.'
"f
r
,
~ :~
I ,
~
\"
...'\.
.... '';. . ..-. '
1\ . A.V ,',
J,', ~~'i.
\ ",........ ~.":"
..~.'.~.;"~.
. i " "..' .
'.' . .". f
.' . ".' "
.. .
I!
1.1
I !
"
1,1
I
. I
.
J'
,E
***AGENDA ITEM NO.J./J\***
Date:
Chula Vista City Council & City Manager
Mrs. Phyllis Altomare, Resident,
Open Space Maintenance (Special Assessment) District 18
Recommended Action for and Specific Objections to Agenda Item No.
26B., regarding the improper assessment of Open Space Special
~~~~~ment District No. 18 and the City's improper, illegal budgeting
practices and assessment determinations of Open Space Special Districts
in general.
June 18, 1991, Chula Vista City Council Public Hearing on FY 1991-92
Budget Adoption (Agenda Item No. 26B., Regular Meeting of City Council,
June 18, 1991).
To:
From:
Re:
REQUESTED
ACTION
(1) Disapprove or Reject Resolution 16214 (Engineer's Reports for FY
1991-92 on Open Space Maintenace Districts) in its entirety or at least to
the extent sufficient to Declare that the Report's Proposed FY 1991-92
Assessments for Open Space Maintenance (Special Assemssment) District No.
18 and all Assessments for Open Space Maintenance Districts 1-11, 14, 15,
17, 18, Eastlake Maintenance District No.1 and Bay Boulevard & Town Centre
are improper, illegal and void for the reasons stated below. (2) Direct
the City Attorney to investigate the matter and to then instruct the City's
Engineers and Department of Parks and Recreation on how to reform and simplify
their methods for determining these special assessments in accordance with
the law; further direct the City Attorney to assign all duties concerning
the management of the Open Space Maintenace Districts to either the City
Engineer's Office or to the Department of Parks and Recreation, if feasible.
(3) Refuse the City Engineer's recommendation to set a July 9, 1991 Public
Hearing as described in Resolution 16214 of Agenda No. 26B. of tonight's
meeting and instead (4) Direct the City Attorney, pursuant to the Brown Act,
to notice and convene a public hearing on July 9, 1991 or soon thereafter
in which the City Attorney, in conjunction with the Department of Parks and
Recreation, shall present the reformed and legally rectified special
assessments for public review and scrutiny; stipulate and Direct also that
at this July 9, 1991 meeting, the Department shall also be directed to submit
to the public for review and approval a rectified system or set of procedures
by which the Department shall hereinafter manage and administer the Special
Assessment Districts, especially with regard to the bookkeeping, budgeting
fl.}'! j ~ :5
processes (assessments determinations) and public disclosure duties involved
in the Department's management of these Special Assessment Districts. (5)
Direct either the City Engineer and/or the Department of Parks and Recreation
to prepare reports reformed in accordance with the directives and proceedings
set forth in actions (1)-(4) above and to submit such reports in place of
the Engineer's Report presented here tonight in Resolution 16214 of Agenda
No. 26B. (6) For the purpose of approving the reformed reports described
in action (5) immediately above, schedule a meeting agenda topic at an
upcoming Regular or Special Meeting of the City of Chula Vista City Council
for the purposes of (i) adopting or approving the said reformed reports and
(ii) setting a public hearing date declaring the intention to levy and collect
the legally rectified special assessments appearing in the reformed reports.
STATEMENT OF REASONS
1. The Special Assessments contained in the Engineer's Reports for FY
1991-92 for City Open Space Maintenance Districts (Resolution 16214, Agenda
Item No. 26B., June 18, 1991 City of Chula Vista City Council Regular Meeting)
are done improperly, and if approved, would be deemed improper, illegal and
void on their face. The Special Assessments are improperly calculated because
assessments paid into a special district are by law to be restricted in their
use, application and allocation to the sole maintenance, purpose and function
for which the special assessment district was created. However, the Special
Assessments under criticism here were calculated in a capricious and
irresponsible or unreasonable manner such that overcharging for services
rendered is occurring and because special assessment revenues are being
applied towards offsetting costs occurring in other special districts and
in areas of the city government not related to the special district being
so charged or assessed. The formulas being used to make the assessments
are arbitrary and are not simply tied to the actual utility bills covering
the costs involved in maintaining a specific Open Space Maintenance District.
Such practices are prima facie illegal and are therefore void.
2. In aJdition to the substantive complaint raised in 1. above, the
assessments are illegal and void because my due process (~rocedural) rights
were vi;l~led as well. Due process rights guaranteed by State Statutory
Law were violated by City officials in preparing and attel pting to implement
J~5€ si 5
the FY 1991-92 Budget Estimates and Assessments in question. Chu1a Vista
Park & Recreation Officials violated the Brown Act (Open Meetings Act for
Local Gov't units) because they gave insufficient notice on budget hearings
and because they gave no real and no meaningful opportunity for discussion
and public comment or public input under Cal. Gov. Code 99 54954.2 & 54954.3
of the Brown Act. The meeting was a sham.
J:~ Cf
June 18, 1991
MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL:
RE: OPPOSITION TO RESOLUTION RE. OPEN SPACE ASSESSMENT DISTRICT 14
I am unable to attend tonight's Council meeting and request that this
statement be made part of the record on the Council item referenced
above.
As a resident of Bonita Long Canyon, I strongly oppose adoption of the
resolution approving the engineer's report for FY 1991-92 for Open
Space District 14 (050 14) for the following reasons:
1. The public hearing, set for July 9, is for the stated purpose
of considering the spreading of assessments. Adoption of this
resolution, by title, approves the report containing the
spread of assessments. This preempts the public's right to
input prior to the decision.
2. When the Council approved formation of this District on Dec.
17, 1985, and Jan. 14, 1986, it was stated that "Assessments
to property owners are proposed to be adjusted with the
addition of each new unit in accordance with the benefits
received." Assessments in OSD 14 do not follow this formula;
they are not based on benefit received, but are equal for all
units. Thus, homes on the canyon, receiving benefits, both
aesthetic and financial from proximity to the canyon, pay the
same as a home on the edge of the development. Spreads for
subsequent Districts were calculated equitably, based on
benefit, as prescribed by law and upheld by the courts.
3. Although the increase for OSD 14 is only 2% this year, past
years' increases range from 30% - 131%. $370/year is too
high, an undue burden on homeowners, out of proportion for
maintaining 277 acres of "natural" open space, and represents
up to an additional 30% on individual tax bills.
4. It is not clear that the 1972 Act permits collection of a
reserve in excess of 50%. Modifying the City Code to permit
this collection does not supercede State law.
Based on the above, I ask that the Council delay action on this item
until the public has the opportunity to be heard. I believe the
assessment spread should be reviewed and calculated based on benefit
received, and the reserve fund should conform to the 1972 Act. I
request notification of any future public hearings, meetings,
opportunities to present comments, etc., on this item.
Sincerely,
\Z.l~~
K. L. Shurson
739 Baylor Avenue
Bonita, CA 91902
.p,dr.ct
-:115
if 7
flcyes
/~, 0(;;<.
t/~Jd~
IJ. 1).
ASSf'55me..J:.t """TOt-oj
91-'1~ l.lHi Bud(Jet
JJ,sfy,'cf-
AssesSn?ent-
J.00, 73
3t/)t/JO
(
3/) 809.
, 381/
S'oG
tfc-,g) 9Co, -+ !J00 ,-,-"",'is
35',J..j8
;;?00 -
130 -
1/
/3(, :::: Id't
7 b == #-ro
-11'.
96,7:1. 5'1) 80{} 37. IIf I,
11'08) 950,
== ./1100,,20 /Wv'-..-f
~~
~ #.r
r 717
UA-tiis
tAM/Is,
.
~
."
.
meN SPACE DISTRICT NO. 5:
OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
HSOIPT"n
A PORTlO~ O~ THE SCUTHWEST CC.1RTER C' ?U.1RTER SECTION 70 "NO
1M[ :xIP"HVLSf ~.fE~ . IJI.:"Rfi.li srew" tt CF 714'[ F!';(iIO t[ L\ n:.cl~l. I:: :hE elfY ~ (AiU 'liST". c~.:;"
tJI SAIl D,[rA. s"'r~ t'F C"LlfC~I&. :Ct";r~ 10 :>> "'('(a r1.I. JU :t1'X " !1:I!~ILL. ''": FlU II: '14'[ rrFl([
OF flo( C':UP:JY 1((011;:(1 !IF SAID s:.., DUGO CCU'Jty.
~
- &.il1l1D D#NrJ
l
....7 ~._'
--;...~.=
... .....-
\:;"\,n."
c., to.::tI'I,",1m
"u
:~:~:~;~:~:~:~:~:
,
f}~}~:!.~~
,
tt'I~~'
':'" .
~. .~ " .,....
J-.l.J.c.
,
-:~:~O;::?l'
.._.J'~ii
,LOT-#"'
,
,
,
, -,
7:>-:;;-,
~
.
~
_-tOT ~H
~
-- - ,...
(......_~-C-
LOT. - If.lal Ac
1.0T .... t 460,;,c
To'al-,1.662 ACo
'In ~'V'- '":11":!'1~;\"!r \"': 1 f'!"I'TrrI!:~
!t.,..",,:"r'1':'
---";~"'~~tJ"'RO./ECT
.~~ -p-'
~~.~ .
....v~~
,.....,.. - ~
~.I'r..-
.
t~
'/':
,
~
~_n"l.....~ ,...._.. ............... _........,._....~
..................o.flro.........,',........lI. ..,......
,...- - ..-...., I.. ru, ,__.. _. ~...."!,,. :...........
..... ..... ..-'......1 _ "1_. ...... ....1.. _ ..___
e.. ..-....., .1111 .'-'......_.1 "'_'111':. .1M' ._..
.,,:,..~.............."I':-..'"..._..........:- ...
... ,.,.....".."....., --... ",'10 ............. ....r.;- ....
......., ...,....... .......... :..."IIr'.....II... _ ..n_""
.....,...tt." -..11 ",.............,......... ...11......"_
.. ........ ,........' ,.........ft..
'_..... ..... -.......... .....,.,..... ............ III.
'''.'''.-''f'''''''.;''''1''~ 'h'...........
vlc.~'IIry !.lAP
""-.........1_............., ,......................"...,.,
.1.........""......_......._..:r.._...........,....1I
I. ...., ..... !....... ....11...11.. "..1.. ...,...........
:.,......... ...-"'"..._...,...1.:_....-.,"..........
~. ..,.;;;;~:-.: ~:''";:'::~~t::~'~ :;;::.:,:~ ~::~n"
.......!I....hoi.,...:.t....._.............2.......
... ~.," ...............
;..- .....""...... --..... ,.......... 11'1'" .t_
......-...........,.1..._......-...-..,..........
""".:0" ....'.. ......,. :..... .............. ... ....~.
....................... I.,....._I~.........:.......
.... ...."....:............,. ......_.... ..I..,,,,,,,
I......... ....... .-......._.."...,.....:.;1'..
....,.-....-.............
""..........-'"..."................._....11...
..'":"~::,..~:::~.:.~ :.:~:....: .'/':_:.':~~:~ ;'~"'hl'
.,.....-.......,uorl...'........UI........",...._..
... ..... .'....1. ..... ......... . ' ... ~ ,.... .;.' , ,t. " . . ,-,:.
11,..,...
..~ <:c....~
,",
tV, (1 ~,J.,.__
illl(U~it" ;"';Ut .~IIS
/-~I!I~"'r
:..:1
?.....~ ~..:'!,..
:JIClUCI (I ","&S I ';:i(';(~II~lI
8- ~O.~
;&:(
.. .......
Gu...h d"YIJ..h_ 1'170 3 4 l./
3 '-f fl /~"l..
~
(:zr ~ I d. 0 C, '6 ~
1v......J ~yy'-<1 - tPS'8o " '6,S
, ~
" 7JL/7).
f./ J 0 g:o J~,1 to~ 1-f/9(p8
J/, R acre.5
OPEN SPACE DISTRICT 5 GW ( '-?). 1;).'- /RR-
EDU 122
FY1991-92 FY1990-91 FY1989-90 FY1988-89 FY1987-8
INDIV ASSESSMENT $260.73 $344.02 '--~ $262.36 $215.29 $158.00
DISTRICT ASSESSMENT $31,809 $41,970 $32,008 $26,265 $19,276
TOTAL BUDGET $34,410 $38,260 $32,350 $26,380 $21,660
Contract Services $20,370 $19,27.0 $16,540 $16,430 $14,770
Utilities $7,520 $1],,200 $9,490 $6,920 $4,430
Materials $1,020 $1,020 $1,020 $550 $550
Landscape Supplies $950 $950 $950 $900 $600
City Staff Services $3,790 $3,790 $4,230 $1,580 $1,310
Backflow Certif $120 $120
SUPPLEMENTALS-ENGR STF SER
/~?-
.2.2-
-t.Lf't
)., I.{ 'I
C~ G g ~~
:/,'O:L
:zt,.cJ
:t.,7..
$640
---
L[ I 'I'D
3!2~O_
3 7 ( 6
) , .
$1,910
$120
3 ~)"2b c
!)o5'd ~
&L
/ l' Ii' CJ CO ~'Y'f So <.M.'-(. hi
'k J /)~ /feg-a';
~ 0 I
--;::::::: -------
-
I
I
,
I.
. "
I-
V-
,
~~
. "'"
. ,} -
":'\ I ~
.I ~
b - -'~ .
r
Ell. ;:
CHlJU
).
-t>
.
~...
VISTA CPEN
ASSESSMENT
SPACE DISTRICr ,0, 9
DIAGRAM
-""
/r~.' ~'5rIl''''''''''''.J
"tJ."H)",& ~ qv~'Tr" S'C'II(I~ ~
"'JlW...tN'~~NI"_C'N1"'."" '.
"., C''''' " ("JI/1r1 rt:ICof. t'laV4"/'T IN $.1M ".,~
sr"'IF fII' e.l1I'~"'~JI. Kt'tJtIf",M!I ~ M"'"
n.'II",.. ~ '"111 "" ,,,,, c;,r.c, 0' O:I/JIIII'?
~I DtI s... ~DN/IIf". MIl, N. I....
,
.
/
~
~
~)f"
pp.
. ~
~\l;
\J
,
-.tJ
I
m
;;
'.
.J.(!lfMl
Mr
I>>PIKT ~IJ'
~"'SIIC""m<< \'
,MiMVUINCII. \
("'5I~_'''' \
Ulr MllMN"
\
\
~
,t>r .. . ,"'....
"'To . .", .It:
Icrc . U 67 .AC
",n' . OUAC
"'" . 4_:ltt.<<-
",,,, . OJO""C'
",Yo 1.$11 At::
I'DT.;II M.4I.At"
---
.
IJ.I.C.
~~
--------
~--._--_..._-
--_.C______
=--=--===--::..-::..--:.-== .#
-.....-.....----.
-----......----
--_. --...--
--.-'-- -- .......
---'----
....-..--- ..
-..--.----
-------
-.....------ -.
----------.-
-_. ----......-
--.---......--
_. --......--.----
-"'1"",-. _____
-----
------
-...--------
-..-- --.-..-
-..----------
---..--- --..--
-... .- --..--....
-----
-..--------
-..------.----
--- -'- - - ----
=--=:==:-':':-":."":":.
---
.~-.....~.
~ II' ,.." C"IMI,..,
.y.... ."....,.. #, I'MI"..",. ....
..A_ ~#_...._
tII#II~ 1",,, .IF ,.."....,... "'CDA~" ".,
.'__d .... ,,.,,..,.. ~,_....,
-
.
"
)1
~I ",' -a
'" I
, I\)
IU 11 -:?-. _
IItll,(".'fl;W . "".'C' W(JA".
r'!-. - ~ ,~"'r-7~
"'~K.~eA ~.""d #- A....~A'tII..1OM _T.
IiiiI
;;'..:'l
OPEN SPACE DISTRICT 9
EDU 384 384
- FY1991-92 FYl990-91 FYl989-90 FYl988-89 FYl987-8
INDIV ASSESSMENT $96.72 $81.82 $44.54 $114.41 $182.00
DISTRICT ASSESSMENT $37,141 $31,419 $17,103 $43,933 $69,888
TOTAL BUDGET $54,860 $60,110 $56,760 $63,050 $79,300
Contract Services $22,270 $21,250 $20,420 $21,120 $22,450
Utilities $18,850 $25,200 $22,580 $33,490 $50,200
Materials $4,290 $4,290 $4,290 $1,780 $880
Landscape Supplies $1,010 $1,010 $1,010 $950 $950
City Staff Services $6,220 $6,220 $7,290 $4,960 $4,070
Backflow Certif $320 $320
Trash Collect/Dispsl $1,260 $1,130 $850. $750 $750
SUPPLEMENTAL-ENGR STP SER
$640
$690
$1,170
ITEM TITLE:
SUBMITTED BY:
(REVISED TITLES AS SHOWN ON AGENDA)
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item dl
Meeting Date 6/18/91
*
Public Hearing: City Initiated Proposal to Amend General Plan and
Zoning Reclassification to Resolve Inconsistencies
Resolution I ~ R 1:5 Approving an Amendment to the Chula Vista
General Plan for Subarea 2 of Part III of Special Study Area B-1 in
Central Chula Vista to change the land use designation from "high" to a
designation of "Professional and Administrative Commercial"
Ordinance i. "i L -< Rezoning certain territory known as Subarea
2 of Part III, wiihin'Study Area B, and generally located within the
Central Chula Vista Community, east of Fourth Avenue between "E" and
Davidson Streets, to require a precise plan for the development of parcels
within the area depicted on Exhibit A attached hereto
Director of Planning /;ltJ
*
REVIEWED BY: City Manager
(4/5ths Vote: Yes_No X)
BACKGROUND:
On June 11, 1991, the City Council held a public hearing on the above referenced General Plan
Amendment and Zoning Proposals. Due to a potential conflict of interest on the part of
Councilman Rindone relative to "Part III-Subarea 2" (an area east of Fourth Avenue between
"E" Street and Davidson Street) the public hearing relative to this subarea was continued to the
meeting of June 18. Attached is the original Council Agenda Statement on this item. It was
recommended by staff and the Planning Commission that the General Plan designation for this
subarea be changed from "High Density Residential" to "Professional and Administrative
Commercial," and that the zoning be changed from C-O (Commercial Office) to C-O-P
(Commercial Office-Precise Plan required).
* Staff report is the same as the one in the Agenda packet. Titles
are changed to reflect the actual title on the Resolution and Ordinance.
~ ~<&-I
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date 6/18/91
RECOMMENDATION:
As pertains to "Part III-Subarea 2" of the Central Chula Vista Zoning Consistency Study area:
1. Based on the Initial Study and comments on the Initial Study and Negative Declaration,
find that the proposed rezonings and General Plan amendments will have no significant
environmental impacts and adopt the Negative Declaration issued on IS-91-13 for the
General Plan/Zoning Consistency Study.
2. Adopt a resolution to change the General Plan as described on the attached Exhibits A,
B, C, and D and Table 1.
3. Adopt an ordinance to change the zones as described on the attached Exhibits A, B, C,
and D and Table I subject to the following conditions:
(a) The City of Chula Vista shall enforce any appropriate legal mechanism sponsored
by the Chula Vista School District and the Sweetwater Union High School
District to mitigate impacts on school facilities.
(b) All existing nonconforming uses created as a result of this action shall be allowed
to be reconstructed in the vent of destruction of greater than 60% of the
property's improvements upon review and approval of the Planning Commission.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: See attached Council Agenda Statement,
dated 6/11/91.
DISCUSSION: See attached Council Agenda Statement, dated 6/11/91.
FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable.
(Al13-GPA91-1.2)
~~ &-~--:<
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item J&
Meeting Date 6/18/91
ITEM TITLE:
City Initiated Proposal to Amend General Plan and Zoning
Reclassification to Resolve Inconsistencies
Public Hearing: GPA-91-IIPCZ-91-C - City-initiated proposal to amend
the General Plan and rezone certain territory, generally bounded by E
Street, H Street, Second Avenue and Third Avenue, plus an additional
area east of Fourth Avenue between "E" and Davidson Streets, to resolve
general planlzoning inconsistencies within the Central Chula Vista
community. The precise territorial limits, proposed rezonings, and
proposed general plan amendments are depicted on attached Exhibits
A,B,C, and D and Table 1.
Resolution 1"1)6 Approving an Amendment to the Chula Vista
General Plan
SUBMITTED BY:
Ordinance JfI,5 Changing the zones as described in Exhibits
A, B, C, and D and Table I, subject to conditions 'a' and 'b'
Director of Planning ;~I!
City Manage~~' (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No.X">
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND:
On June 11, 1991, the City Council held a public hearing on the above referenced General Plan
Amendment and Zoning Proposals. Due to a potential conflict of interest on the part of
Councilman Rindone relative to "Part III-Subarea 2" (an area east of Fourth Avenue between
"E" Street and Davidson Street) the public hearing relative to this subarea was continued to the
meeting of June 18. Attached is the original Council Agenda Statement on this item. It was
recommended by staff and the Planning Commission that the General Plan designation for this
subarea be changed from "High Density Residential" to "Professional and Administrative
Commercial," and that the zoning be changed from C-O (Commercial Office) to C-O-P
(Commercial Office-Precise Plan required).
~B-I
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date 6/18/91
RECOMMENDATION:
As pertains to "Part III-Subarea 2" of the Central Chula Vista Zoning Consistency Study area:
I. Based on the Initial Study and comments on the Initial Study and Negative Declaration,
find that the proposed rezonings and General Plan amendments will have no significant
environmental impacts and adopt the Negative Declaration issued on IS-91-13 for the
General Plan/Zoning Consistency Study.
2. Adopt a resolution to change the General Plan as described on the attached Exhibits A,
B, C, and D and Table 1.
3. Adopt an ordinance to change the zones as described on the attached Exhibits A, B, C,
and D and Table I subject to the following conditions:
(a) The City of Chula Vista shall enforce any appropriate legal mechanism sponsored
by the Chula Vista School District and the Sweetwater Union High School
District to mitigate impacts on school facilities.
(b) All existing nonconforming uses created as a result of this action shall be allowed
to be reconstructed in the vent of destruction of greater than 60 % of the
property's improvements upon review and approval of the Planning Commission.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: See attached Council Agenda Statement,
dated 6/11191.
DISCUSSION: See attached Council Agenda Statement, dated 6/11/91.
FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable.
(All3-0PA91-1.2)
J,8 - ~
ORDINANCE NO. ~\f"~
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA REZONING CERTAIN
TERRITORY KNOWN AS SUBAREA 2 OF PART III, WITHIN STUDY
AREA B, AND GENERALLY LOCATED WITHIN THE CENTRAL CHULA
VISTA COMMUNITY, EAST OF FOURTH AVENUE BETWEEN "E" AND
DAVIDSON STREETS, TO REQUIRE A PRECISE PLAN FOR THE
DEVELOPMENT OF PARCELS WITHIN THE AREA DEPICTED ON
EXHIBIT A ATTACHED HERETO
WHEREAS, the Council has studied the feasibility and propriety
of replanning and rezoning an area referred to as the General
plan/Zoning Consistency Study Special Study Area B-1 in Central
Chula vista which is generally bounded by "E" Street on the north,
"H" Street on the south, Second Avenue on the east, and Third
Avenue on the west and, in addition, includes a small area located
east of Fourth Avenue between "E" and Davidson streets, and, in
addition, includes a small area located east of Fourth Avenue
between "E" and Davidson streets, inclusive ("Study Area"); and
WHEREAS, said Study Area includes approximately 50 acres and
219 lots and was divided into three subareas to facilitate analysis
and working with the community; Part I generally includes the
southern area located between "H" and "G" Streets, Part II includes
the central area located between "G" and "F" Streets; and Part III
includes an area located between "F" and "E" Streets, referred to
as Subarea 1, as well as the small area adjacent to Fourth Avenue
which area is represented in the map attached hereto as Exhibit A
as Subarea 2 ("Subarea 2"), and which area is the subject matter of
this ordinance; and
WHEREAS, the city council bifurcated Subarea 2 from the
remainder of the other Parts and areas in the Study Area,
introduced an ordinance rezoning the other areas at their city
council meeting of June 11, 1991, and deferred consideration of
Subarea 2 of Part III at that time; and
WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator conducted an
Initial Study, IS-91-13, of potential environmental impacts
associated with the implementation of the proposed rezonings and
General Plan amendments and based on the Initial Study and comments
thereon, the Coordinator has concluded that this reclassification
contemplated by this ordinance would cause no significant
environmental impacts as per the Negative Declaration issued on IS-
91-13; and,
WHEREAS, on April 10, 1991, the Planning commission recom-
mended approval by a vote of 6-0-1 (Commissioner Martin abstained)
of the revisions to the Land Use and Land Use Diagram of the Land
Use Element of the General Plan provided for in council Resolution
No. ' and of the rezoning of said Study Area in the
manner herein provided; and,
cJi ,3
WHEREAS, at the Council Meetings at which this Ordinance was
introduced, the City Council adopted Resolution No.
amending the General Plan to permit increased planning densities in
the manner therein provided ("General Plan Amendment"); and,
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the reduction in
densities permitted by this rezoning is consistent with the
increased densities permitted by the General Plan Amendment; and,
Now, therefore, the City Council of the city of Chula vista
does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1. Rezoning.
Subarea 2 is hereby rezoned so that Subarea 2, which is
designated and described on Exhibit A (attached hereto), shall be
changed from the zoning designation of c-o to the zoning
designation of C-O-P.
SECTION 2. Special Development Standard Requirements for Zone
with "P"-modifier relating to Destruction of Pre-existing, Non-
Conforming Use.
For Subarea 2, as part of the development that the City will
incorporate into any precise plans for the development or use of
property within said subareas, one such development standard shall
be that, notwithstanding section 19.64.150 of the Chula vista
Municipal Code, all existing uses within the Study Area which are
made non-conforming as a result of this action shall be allowed to
be reconstructed in the event of destruction even if the degree of
destruction is greater than 60% of the property's improvements,
subject to review and approval of the Planning commission. The
Council finds that this mandatory development standard is necessary
to accomplish the Council's objective in this particular case, to
wit: to stabilize the existing neighborhood from further increases
in density.
SECTION 3. School Impact Fees Policy.
As a matter of policy, the City of Chula vista shall enforce
such legal mechanisms sponsored by the Chula vista School District
and the Sweetwater Union High School District as may be approved by
the city to mitigate impacts on school facilities.
SECTION 4: This ordinance shall take effect and be in full
force on the thirtieth day from and after its adoption.
~'i-'I
Presented by
Robert A. Leiter, Director of
Planning
studyb13 . wp
J
J
d, City Attorney
1. Insert Council Reso No. on General Plan Amendments.
d(~~
RESOLUTION NO.~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA AMENDING THE CHULA VISTA GENERAL PLAN FOR
SUBAREA 2 OF PART III OF SPECIAL STUDY AREA B-1 IN
CENTRAL CHULA VISTA TO CHANGE THE LAND USE
DESIGNATION FROM "HIGH" TO A DESIGNATION OF
"PROFESSIONAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE COMMERCIAL".
The City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, this item involves amending the General Plan for a
part of the area ("Study Area") referred to as the General
Plan/Zoning Consistency Study Special Study Area B-1 in Central
Chula vista which is generally bounded by "E" Street on the north,
"H" Street on the south, Second Avenue on the east, and Third
Avenue on the west and, in addition, includes a small area located
east of Fourth Avenue between "E" and Davidson Streets; and
WHEREAS, said Study Area includes approximately 50 acres and
219 lots and was divided into three subareas to facilitate analysis
and working with the community; Part I generally includes the
southern area located between "H" and "G" Streets; Part II
generally includes the central area located between "G" and "F"
Streets; and Part III which generally includes the northern area
located between "F" and "E" Streets, as well as the small area
adjacent to Fourth Avenue, which area is represented in the map
attached hereto as Exhibit A as Subarea 2 ("Subarea 2"), which is
the subject matter of this resolution; and,
WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator conducted an
Initial Study, IS-91-13, of potential environmental impacts
associated with the implementation of the proposed rezonings and
General Plan amendments and based on the Initial Study and comments
thereon, the Coordinator has concluded that this reclassification
and redesignation would cause no significant environmental impacts
as per the Negative Declaration issued on IS-91-13; and
WHEREAS, on April 10, 1991, the Planning commission
recommended approval by a vote of 6-0-1 (Commissioner Martin
abstained) of the revisions to the Land Use and Land Use Diagram of
the Land Use Element of the General Plan herein provided for;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city Council of the
city of Chula vista does hereby amend the Land Use Designations,
and the corresponding sections of the Land Use Diagram, for the
Land Use Element of the General Plan as set forth below:
1. For that portion of Part 3 as shown on Exhibit A as
June 12, 1991
studyb14.wp
General Plan Amendment, Part III, Subarea 2
Page 1
/15J .~
"Subarea 2", from a Land Use Designation of "High" to a designation
of "Professional and Administrative commercial".
Presented by
Approved as to form by
/! Ih
/....
/ , ' :.u... .
City Attorney
Robert A. Leiter, Director of
Planning
Bruce M. Boogaar
STUDYBl4.WP
June 10, 1991
atudyb14.wp
General Plan Amendment, Part III, Subarea 2
Page 2
/)~'7 /~8-~
For Exhibits and Attachments, see Item No.8
of this Agenda.
62. ) -~
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Meeting
Item4-
Date 6/18/91
ITEM TITLE: a) Public Hearing to Consider Establishing
Fees for Security Alarm Permits Increasing
Fees for False Alarms and Establishing Late
Fee ,/
llfffD~
b) Resolution Amending Master Fee Schedule
c) ordinancJL~lnding Chapter 9.06 of the
Municipal Code Relating to Regulation
of security Alarm Permits
SUBMITTED BY: Chief o~~ice
REVIEWED BY: City Manage1 (4/sths Vote: YeS_No x )
Currently, the Police Department is responding to 550 security
alarms every month. This is very time-consuming for patrol
officers and for the office staff who must monitor these alarms and
apply the provisions of the Alarm Ordinance 9.06 CVMC. Staff plans
to alleviate this problem with changes in the Alarm Ordinance and
contracting with an alarm tracking company to monitor the Alarm
Ordinance.
RECOMMENDATION:
1) Conduct a Public Hearing pursuant to Government Code
section 66018 to hear testimony regarding the proposed
fees
2) Adopt the Resolution Amending the Master Fee Schedule,
effective the same date the Ordinance Amendment becomes
effective
3) Place Ordinance on First Reading
4) That Council agree in concept to entering into an
agreement with Enforcement Technology, Inc. and staff
return with the formal agreement at a later Council
meeting
DISCUSSION:
When the Security Alarm Ordinance was adopted in 1981 we were
averaging 150 alarms each month. In 1991 the monthly average has
climbed to 550 and this coupled with a false alarm rate of 99.5%
dl9-1
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date 6/18/91
results in a significant drain on the time of patrol officers.
staff has determined that on the average, an officer spends 16.5
minutes on each alarm. Based on an hourly rate of $26.00, (salary
plus fringe benefits), the annual cost is $47,190 (16.5 minutes X
550 calls per month X 12 months = 108,900 minutes ~ 60 = 1,815
hours X $26.00). This does not account for the fact that two
officers are sent on many alarms; the time it takes to process the
call in the Communications Center; and the staff time to monitor
the alarm ordinance.
The current ordinance is designed to discourage false alarms by
creating a penalty/fine system after a given number of false alarms
has occurred. Traditionally, the Alarm Ordinance has been
monitored by the two employees assigned to the Crime Prevention
unit. The rapid escalation in alarm responses has created a
significant work load increase for the unit. currently, the unit
is spending almost 50% of their time monitoring the Alarm
Ordinance. Even with this significant allotment of time the
billing process for false alarms is two to four months delayed.
To reduce the staff time and the number of false alarms, staff is
recommending the following changes:
1) Require an initial fee of $10 for an alarm
permit and a two year renewal fee of $2. The
current Ordinance does not require any fee for
an alarm permit. staff reviewed the alarm
ordinances in fourteen jurisdictions in San
Diego County and twelve of them required a
fee. The average fee is $18.00. This initial
fee pays for the staff time involved in
placing the new alarm permit in the system.
Staff is also recommending a nominal fee of
$2. to renew the alarm permit bi-annually.
In the current ordinance the alarm permit does
not have to be renewed. This renewal will
provide the department with an opportunity to
obtain updated information on the permit
especially as it applies to the name, address
and phone number of the person who can respond
to emergencies such as alarm activations. If
this change is approved, all the 2,750
current alarm permit holders would be required
to pay the $2. renewal fee at this time and
new permits would require a fee of $10.
2) The false alarm fining system would be
increased and simplified.
J f-J.
Page 3, Item
Meeting Date 6/18/91
The current ordinance reads as follows:
B. 1. a and b.
CVMC 9.06.130
"a. More than two in any thirty-day period, or
more than three within any ninety-day period; or
more than four within any one-hundred-eighty-day
period; or more than six in anyone-year period
shall result in a penalty assessment to twenty-five
dollars;
b. Each additional alarm after the twenty-five
dollar penalty assessment for any given time period
shall result in a penalty assessment of fifty
dollars."
This system has proven to be very confusing for the public and
complicated for the staff to administer. The fines have not
changed since 1981 and they need to be increased to send a stronger
message to decrease false alarms. The new language, which would be
included in the Master Fee Schedule would be as follows:
"The first two (2) false alarms within a twelve (12)
month period shall be considered accidental and no fee
shall be charged. The alarm permit applicant shall be
notified in writing after the occurrence of the second
false alarm, notifying him/her that any further false
alarms will result in penalty assessments.
For false alarms exceeding the initial two (2) false
alarms within a twelve (12) month period:
Third (3rd) false alarm - Twenty-Five Dollars
($25.00) .
Fourth (4th), Fifth (5th) and Sixth 6th) false
alarms - Fifty Dollars ($50.00).
All additional false alarms
Dollars ($100.00) each."
One Hundred
3) Whenever an alarm activation is called into
the police communications center by the alarm
monitoring company, they will provide the
police dispatcher with the alarm permit
number. This will allow the department
&19 -3
Page 4, Item
Meeting Date 6/18/91
to initiate activity to monitor that permit
number and also insure that all monitored
alarms have obtained permits from the city as
required by the Ordinance.
4) All fees due to violations of the false alarm
sections in the ordinance would be due and
payable within 30 days of the billing date
(CVMC 9.06.2130C); a late fee of fifteen
(15%) of the false alarm Assessment shall be
added to the unpaid balance of any assessments
required by this section not paid within
thirty days of the billing date (CVMC
9.06.1300); and the amount of any penalty
assessment fee and late fee assessed pursuant
to this section shall be deemed a debt to the
City, and an action may be commenced by the
issuing officer in the name of the city in any
court of competent jurisdiction in the amount
of the delinquent debt. Payment of any
penalty assessment fees and late charges shall
not prohibit criminal prosecution for the
violation of any provisions of this Chapter
(CVMC 9.06.130E).
These three new sections will
payments and further the goal of
false alarms and compensating the
staff services rendered.
expedite
reducing
City for
5) That the City enter into an agreement with an
alarm tracking company to monitor the security
Alarm Ordinance. contracting with an Alarm
Tracking Service would have the following
advantages:
a) Eliminate the significant staff
hours now being performed by the
Crime Prevention Unit in monitoring
the Security Alarm Ordinance.
b) Eliminate staff hours performed by
Finance staff in billing for false
alarm violation.
P9- 1-
Page 5, Item
Meeting Date 6/18/91
c) Decrease false alarms by providing a
more efficient monitoring of the
system.
d) Generate revenue to pay for staff
costs in monitoring the program.
staff has located three companies that provide
alarm tracking services in San Diego and
Orange Counties. They are Western Alarm
Tracking (WAT) located in Fountain Valley, and
Enforcement Technology, Inc. (ETEC) in Tustin,
and Alarm Management Services (AMS) of San
Diego.
Staff has received offers from each company. WAT charges 40% of
the money collected, AMS charges 33% of the money collected and
ETEC charges a specified fee for each transaction they perform.
Staff has analyzed these three proposals utilizing alarm experience
during 1990 which included the following factors:
Number of false alarm activations 6,530
Number of false alarm fines due 314
Number of false alarm payments received 208
Total fine payments received $25,650.
EXAMPLES OF COSTS
Currently, there are approximately 2,800 permits on file. Last
calendar year, there were approximately 6,530 false alarm
activations. There were 314 false alarm fines mailed to residents
and businesses. only 208 fine payments were received.
The following are examples of fees accrued from the past years
transactions, using all three possible vendors. These examples do
not include the proposed permit fee.
J9-5
Page 6, Item
Meeting Date 6/18/81
ETEC
6,530 false alarm activations @ $.35 each = $2,285.00
314 false alarm fines @ $.95 each = $298.30
208 payments processed @ $.20 = $41.60
Total dollar amount collected and deposited: $25,650.00 collected
for city
city Makes
Service Payment
Profit
$25,650.00
- 3.600.00
$22,050.00
($300
minimum monthly service
charge - not to exceed
$9,000 annually)
WAT
No fee for false alarm data recording, no fee for alarm fines, and
no fee for payment processing
40% of amount collected for payment of services
Percentage paid = $10,260.00
city Makes
Service Payment
Profit
$25,650.00
-10.260.00
$15,390.00
AMS
No fee for false alarm data recording, no fee for alarm fines, and
no fee for payment processing
33% of amount collected for payment of services
Percentage Paid = $8,464.50
city Makes
Service Payment
Profit
$25,650.00
- 8.464.50
$17,185.50
c9cr-h
Page 7, Item
Meeting Date 6/18/91
If the Council approves the new fee schedule of $10 for new alarm
permits, ETEC will charge $2.50 for including the new permit in the
system and WAT will charge $4. and AMS will charge $3.30.
staff concludes that it would be more profitable to enter into a
service agreement with ETEC.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The $2.00 renewal fee applied to the current number of permits will
yield $5,500 ($2.00 X 2,750). Staff estimates the number of new
permits in a twelve month period would yield $300 ($7.50 X 400).
The funds collected via false alarm fees includes several variables
which do not allow for a specific fiscal estimate.
ALARMl13
$-7
RESOLUTION NO.~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE MASTER FEE SCHEDULE
TO ESTABLISH THE SECURITY ALARM SYSTEM FEES
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the Ci ty of Chula Vista provides response to
security alarm systems; and
WHEREAS, rules
service have previously
these services; and
and regulations,
been established
fees,
for
and charges
the operation
for
of
WHEREAS, it has been necessary to revise these rules,
regulations, fees and charges from time to time; and
WHEREAS, the false alarm assessment fee schedule was
last revised by the City Council of Chula Vista on July 28, 1982;
and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to initiate a permit fee for
the alarm user's application to recoup the costs of administering
the ordinance; and
WHEREAS, a system of graduated fees for successive false
alarms in a twelve (12) month period would serve as an incentive
for proper installation, maintenance, monitoring and use of such
systems, thereby minimizing demands on law enforcement (and/or
fire) services.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula Vista does hereby amend the Master Fee Schedule
by adding new sections thereto to read as follows:
Sec. 9.06.050 Alarm User Permit - Fee
A non-refundable fee shall accompany each application
for an alarm user permit as follows:
A. A fee of ten dollar s ($10.00) for both bus iness
and residential applications.
B. A two dollar ($2.00) renewal fee will be
required every twenty-four (24) months.
Sec. 9.06.130 False Alarm Fee Assessment
When any
notices are
results in
emergency alarms, messages, signals, or
received by the Communications Center which
a police response and in which the alarm
-a=l~
&<f-~
proves to be a false alarm, the owner and/or occ~pier of
the property shall pay a false alarm assessment to the
city as follows:
A. The first two (2) false alarms within a twelve (12)
month period shall be considered accidental and no
fee shall be charged. The alarm permi t appl ican t
shall be notified in writing by the Crime Prevention
Unit after the occurrence of the second false alarm,
notifying him/her that any further false alarms will
result in penalty assessments.
B. For false alarms exceeding the initial two (2) false
alarms within a twelve (12) month period:
1. Third (3rd) false alarm
($25.00).
Twenty-Five Dollars
2. Fourth (4th), Fifth (5th) and Sixth (6th) false
alarms - Fifty Dollars ($50.00).
3. All additional false alarms
Dollars ($100.00) each.
One Hundred
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the changes in these fees
shall be effective on the same date Ordinance No. 2457 becomes
effective June 20, 1991.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
william J. winters, Chief of
Police
8541a
'\ n
, C-}lJ 1.---'/ ';"'/
D. Richard Rudol ,~Assistant
city Attorney _,
~ l;Fj-Cf
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item 3d
Meeting Date 6/18/91
Publ ic Hearing: Consideration of the adoption of the budget
for Fiscal Year 1991-92 which includes establ ishing an
appropriations limit for Fiscal Year ended 6/30/92
Reso 1 ut i on \\a ~\1 Adopt i ng an appropri at ions 1 i mi t for
fiscal year ending June 30, 1992
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Finance .t~
REVIEWED BY: City Manager J+ (4/5ths Vote: Yes_Noll
Government Code Section 7910 requires each local government to establish its
Gann (Article XIIIB of the Cal ifornia Constitution) appropriations 1 imit by
resolution each year at a regularly scheduled meeting or noticed special
meeting.
ITEM TITLE:
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution establishing an
appropriations limit of $49,635,708 for the 1991-92 fiscal year.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
Article XIIIB of the California Constitution specifies that appropriations
fi nanced from "Proceeds of Taxes" may increase annually by the change in
population of the city and the change in the U.S. Consumer Price Index or
Ca 1 i forni a per capi ta personal income, wh i chever is 1 ess. For 1991-92, the
lesser increase is California per capita personal income at 4.14%.
"Proceeds of Taxes" i ncl udes such revenues as property taxes, sales and use
taxes, utility users taxes, transient occupancy taxes, and state subventions.
Revenues from other sources 1 i ke fees/charges and federal grants are
considered "Non-Proceeds of Taxes" and not subject to limit.
The State Department of Fi nance is charged with provi di ng the data necessary
for local jurisdictions to establish their appropriation limit. Based on this
data, the 1991-92 appropriation limit has been calculated as follows:
Fiscal Year 1990-91 Appropriation Limit
Increase in the California per capita
personal income
Increase by the Population Change in Chula
Vista from January 1, 1990 to January 1, 1991
$46,135,401
x 1.0414 (4.14%)
FISCAL YEAR 1991-92 APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
x 1.0331 (3.31%)
$49,635,708
FISCAL IMPACT: The "Proceeds of Taxes" subject to the appropriations 1 imit
are estimated to be $32,921,310 for FY 1991-92. Chula Vista has an
appropriation "gap" of $16,714,398.
WPC 0626G
30-1
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
Meeting Date 6/18/91
ITEM TITLE:
Public Hearing: Consideration of the adoption
of the budget for FY 1991-92 which includes
establishing an appropriations limit for fiscal
year ending 6/30/92
Resolution Approving the budget for FY
1991-92 and appropriating necessary funds
SUBMITTED BY: City ManagerfJ (4/Sths Vote: Yes_No X)
The City Council has reviewed the proposed FY 1991-92 Operating and
Capital budgets through a series of budget review workshops. In
accordance with the City Charter, a public hearing is now required
to consider the general City budget.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council accept public testimony and adopt the
proposed budget as amended during the review sessions and as may be
further amended as a result of the public hearing.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION: The proposed FY 1991-92 budget presented to Council
represents a base line from which further adjustments (cuts) will
be made if the State significantly reduces City revenues. Once the
State budget is adopted and its effect on Chula Vista is known,
staff will return to Council with a recommendation.
During the Budget review sessions Council approved the following
adjustments to the proposed budget:
PREVIOUSLY APPROVED BY COUNCIL
General Fund IOn-Goina Operations}
Department
Adiustment Item
1400
PUBLIC WORKS
$ 6,300 Fuel Tank Containment Boxes at
Fire Station * 2
1500
PARKS & REC
($33,950) Reduced funding level for Senior
Information and Referral Center
Sub-Total On-Going
Operations
($27,650)
30.. ~
Page 2 ,Item
Meeting Date 6/18/91
General Fund (Special)
720
NON-DEPART.
$100,000 Employee Computer Loan program
advance. To be reimbursed
with interest.
Sub-Total Special
Adjustments
$100,000
Other Funds
Department
Adiustment Item
585
OPEN SPACE
$20,870 EastLake Maintenance District
expansion to include EastLake
Medians
567
OPEN SPACE
$ 7,110 Landscape Maintenance District
for Bel Air Ridge
Sub-Total Other Funds
Adjustments
$27,980
TOTAL PREVIOUSLY
APPROVED ADJUSTMENTS
$100,330
RECOMMENDED FOR APPROVAL JUNE 18. 1991
Additional changes recommended for approval on June 18, 1991:
General Fund (On-Goinq Operations)
Department
Adiustment
Item
1400
PUBLIC WORKS
$ 5,510 Adjustment for FY92 asphalt
and chip bid to be awarded
6/18/91
1500 PARKS & REC ($17,430) Rohr Pool closure
Sub-Total 6/18 On-Going
Operations ($11,920)
OTHER FUNDS
Department Adiustment Item
568 OPEN SPACE ($17,590) Water conservation (Dist. 18)
705 EQUIP REPLCMNT $20,000 City vehicle replacement
700 CENTRAL GARAGE ($25,410) Correction of input errors
Sub-Total 6/18
Other Funds ($23,000)
~-3
Other Funds
($23,000)
Page 3, Item
Meeting Date 6/18/91
TOTAL 6/18 ADJUSTMENTS
($34,920)
SUMMARY OF ADJUSTMENTS
Total General Fund (On-Going Operations)
Total General Fund (Special)
Total Other Funds
($ 39,570)
$100,000
$ 4,980
$ 65,410
GRAND TOTAL ALL ADJUSTMENTS
The above does not include changes made to the Redevelopment Agency
or SCOOT budget as these are not part of the City's operating
budget. Changes to the Redevelopment Agency budget will be
considered at an upcoming Agency meeting.
Authorization for Minor Intrafund Project Transfers
Included, for the first time, as part of the resolution approving
the Budget is authorization for the City Manager and Finance
Director to approve minor intra fund capital improvement project
transfers. This authorization is limited to the lesser of $20,000
or 10% of the original appropriation for the capital improvement
project.
This is being proposed in response to concerns about the length of
the Council agenda and the on-going effort to keep relatively minor
and routine matters, which can easily be handled by staff, off of
the agenda.
FISCAL IMPACT: The adopted budget will be $89,375,259 and includes
$68,232,353 for operations and $21,142,906 for capital projects.
If the special restricted budgets such as the Redevelopment Agency,
Industrial Development Authority and SCOOT were included, the All
Funds Operating Budget would be $73,802,349.
fy92budr
30-1
RESOLUTION NO ~~~\~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE ADOPTION OF THE FINAL
BUDGET OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA FOR THE FISCAL
YEAR BEGINNING JULY 1, 1991 AND ENDING JUNE 30,
1992
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, pursuant to the provisions of the Charter of the
City of Chula Vista, Sections 1004 and 1005, the City Council is
required to adopt a budget for the fiscal year beginning July 1,
1991 and ending June 30, 1992, and
WHEREAS, the City Manager has prepared and filed with the
City Clerk his proposed budget, and
WHEREAS, due notice has been given by the City Clerk, as
required by law, that said proposed budget is on file and open to
anyone interested, and
WHEREAS, a hearing has been held on said proposed budget
as required by law, and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Chula vista that there is hereby appropriated out of the
treasury of the City of Chula Vista for municipal purposes and for
use by the various departments, the amounts shown in Exhibit "A",
attached hereto and incorporated herein by reference as if set
forth fully and all appropriations contained in this resolution are
within the legal spending limitations authorized by law.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the appropriations attached
are approved as the budget for the 1991-92 fiscal year and that the
City Manager and the Director of Finance be authorized to transfer
appropriations within control accounts for all services and to
transfer appropriations between control accounts for Employee
Services only.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Manager and Director
of Finance are hereby authorized to approve minor intrafund project
transfers as long as such a transfer does not jeopardize the
completion of an approved project, and the accumulated total
transfers are less than 10% of the total original appropriation of
the project to which the funds are tranferred, or $20,000,
whichever is lesser.
3t>A - j
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that all proceeds of tax revenues
received in excess of the budget estimate are hereby appropriated
up to the legal spending limit to the reserve for contingency
account of the applicable fund.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Director of Finance may,
from time to time, invest temporarily idle funds from anyone fund
in legal investments provided by law for charter cities.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the inter fund transfers
described on Exhibit B, attached hereto and made a part hereof, are
hereby authorized; and any such inter fund transfers described
thereon as loans shall bear 9% per annum which the city Council
finds and determines is the current prime interest rate.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that revenues received from
Developer Deposit Funds for projects for which consultants rather
than City officers or employees are engaged are hereby continuously
appropriated to the Developer Deposit Fund.
Presented by
orney
John D. Goss, City Manager
-2-
o 120a
30A-"2.
INCLUDING ALL PROPOSED CHANGES
--------OPERATING BUDGETS----------
PREPARED: 26-JUN-91
MGR. REC. COUNCIL APPRVD
1991-92 1991-92
CONTROL ACCOUNTS DEPARTMENT / ACTIVITY APPROPRIATION APPROPRIATION $$ CHANGE
-------------------- -------------------------- --------------- --------------- -----------
100-0105 CITY COUNCIL $282,180 $282,180
100-0111 THRU 0128 BOARDS & COMMISSIONS $62,770 $62,770
100-0130 THRU 0141 COMMUNITY PROMOTIONS $21,250 $21,250
100-0150 CITY ATTORNEY $614,850 $614,850
100-0160 THRU 0170 CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS $255,910 $255,910
100-0210 ADMINISTRATION $923,160 $923,160
~ 100-0212 THRU 0215 MANAGEMENT SERVICES $1,277,690 $1,277,690
~ 100-0250 THRU 0255 PERSONNEL/VOLUNTEERS $866,485 $866,485
:. 100-0260 THRU 0261 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT $1,039,730 $1,039,730
100-0420 THRU 0440 FINANCE/PURCHASING $1,321,470 $1,321,470
, 100-0621 THRU 0623 PLANNING $1,449,950 $1,449,950
~
100-0700 INSURANCE $878,830 $878,830
100-0730 NON-DEPARTMENTAL $290,140 $390,140 $100,000
100-0800 OTAY RANCH PROJECT $185,910 $185,910
100-1011 THRU 1100 POLICE $14,733,080 $14,683,080 ($50,000)
100-1211 THRU 1250 FIRE $6,247,320 $6,247,320
100-1301 THRU 1340 BUILDING & HOUSING $1,285,250 $1,285,250
100-1401 THRU 1471 PUBLIC WORKS/ENG $10,305,310 $10,442,120 $136,810
100-1511 THRU 1538 PARKS & RECREATION $4,316,310 $4,264,930 ($51,380)
100-1611 THRU 1695 LIBRARY $2,866,424 $2,866,424
-------------- -------------- -----------
TOTAL GENERAL FUND--OPERATING BUDGETS $49,224,019 $49,359,449 $135,430
--------------- --------------- -----------
--------------- --------------- -----------
--------SPECIAL REVENUE----------
MGR. REC. COUNCIL APPRVD
1991-92 1991-92
CONTROL ACCOUNTS DEPARTMENT / ACTIVITY APPROPRIATION APPROPRIATION $$ CHANGE
-------------------- -------------------------- --------------- --------------- -----------
216-2161 CLSA - LITERACY GRANT $27,200 $27,200
219-2190 THRU 2192 CRIMINAL JUSTICE GRANTS $124,430 $124,430
220-2220 THRU 222-2220 SEWER CAPITAL FUNDS $2,000 $2,000
223-2230 MONTGOMERY SEWER MAINT $640,600 $640,600
225-2250 SEWER SERVICE FUND $2,863,160 $2,863,160
230-2300 PARKING METER FUND $259,930 $259,930
235-2350 TRANSIT SERVICE FUND $189,940 $189,940
236-2360 TRANSIT, ELDERLY/HAND I $284,960 $284,960
237-2370 TRANSIT, BAYFRNT TRLY $44,350 $44,350
~ 250-2503 THRU 2504 GAS TAX FUNDS $1,765,204 $1,765,204
3000;3001;3050;3100; DEBT SERVICE FUNDS $7,522,630 $7,522,630
~ 5430;5450;5470;9800
415-4150 NATURE INTERPRETIVE CNTR $416,400 $416,400
. 416-4160 BCT BOOKSTORE $76,900 $76,900
...t 551-5510 THRU 5680 OPEN SPACE DISTRICTS $1,259,380 $1,248,900 ($10,480)
575-5750 TOWN CENTRE LNDSCP DIST I $52,460 $52,460
580-5800 BAY BLVD LNDSCP DIST $11,890 $11,890
585-5850 EASTLAKE MAINTENANCE DIST $72,340 $93,210 $20,870
621-6210 THRU 6219 TRANSPORTATION DIF $361,080 $361,080
622-6220 EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT RESERVE $12,000 $12,000
646-6461 COMMNTY DEVLP BLK GRNT FND $648,424 $648,424
700-7000* CENTRAL GARAGE FUND $1,214,270 $1,188,860 ($25,410)
705-7050* EQUIPMENT RPLCMNT FUND $830,000 $850,000 $20,000
800-8010 THRU 8100 PUBLIC FACILITIES DIF $263,376 $263,376
TOTAL OTHER FUNDS--OPERATING BUDGETS
$18,942,924
$68,166,943
$18,947,904
$68,307,353
$4,980
$140,410
GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS--OPERATING BUDGETS
--------------- --------------- -----------
--------------- --------------- -----------
* AMOUNT APPROPRIATED IN OTHER FUNDS AND SHOWN HERE FOR DISPLAY PURPOSES ONLY
\tJ
~
~
,
~
CONTROL ACCOUNTS
215-2150
216-2162
250-2501
251-2511
XXX-XXXX*
600-6001
600-6002
600-6003
600-6004
600-6005
600-6006
600-6007
600-6008
602-6020
603-6030
604-6040
605-6050
621-6210
800-8010 THRU 8100
644-6440
252-2520
DEPARTMENT / ACTIVTY
GOLF COURSE REVENUE FUND
CLSA - CAPITAL
GAS TAX FUNDS
FEDERAL AID TO URBAN
OTAY VALLEY ROAD ASSESSMENT
GENERAL FUND
SPECIAL CAPITAL OUTLAY
RESIDTL CONST TAX FND
PRKLND ACQ & DVLPMNT FND
TRAFFIC SIGNAL FND
SEWER INCOME FUND
SPECIAL SEWER FUND
TRUNK SEWER CAPTL RESERVE
TDA FUNDS (SCOOT)
TRANSPORTATION SALES TAX
CHARTER POINT DEPOSIT
LIBRARY CONSTRUCTION FUND
TRANSPORTATION DIF
PUBLIC FACILITIES DIF
CDBG (NEW ENTITLEMENT)
DEFENSE ACCESS FUNDS
GRAND TOTAL--CAPITAL BUDGETS
GRAND TOTAL OPERATING AND
CAPITAL BUDGETS
--------CAPITAL BUDGETS----------
MGR. REC.
1991-92
APPROPRIATION
$108,750
$0
$1,229,100
$255,500
$10,407,178
$0
$23,598
$524,177
$174,500
$66,059
$0
$303,400
$694,200
$370,000
$2,243,300
$558,000
$314,000
$101,250
$2,634,144
$739,550
$396,200
$21,142,906
COUNCIL APPRVD
1991-92
APPROPRIATION
$108,750
$0
$1,229,100
$255,500
$10,407,178
$0
$23,598
$524,177
$174,500
$73,189
$0
$320,520
$694,200
$300,000
$2,243,300
$558,000
$314,000
$105,380
$2,680,864
$739,550
$396,200
$21,148,006
$$ CHANGE
$7,130
$17,120
($70,000)
$4,130
$46,720
$5,100
$89,309,849 $89,455,359 $145,510
--------------- --------------- -----------
--------------- --------------- -----------
* Fund to be established at time of issuance of assessment district bonds.
05/10/91 CITY OF CHULA VISTA OTHER FINANCING SOURCES & USES FY 1991-92
REF AMWNT TO FROM PURPOSE BASIS SCHEDULE REF' REF'
c:z==s.====...s.._====_=:.....:======.===_:====================....._._=_====_========================_====_z=======================z===================================
115,ODD GENERAL FUND CA. LIBRARY SERVICES LIBRARY SERVICE SUPPORT BIll/ACT 12/91 ;SOX - 6/92 Bal/Act 100-270 216
80,000 GENERAL FUND PUBLIC LIBRARY FUND LIBRARY SERVICE SUPPORT BIll/ACT 12/91 ;sax - 6/92 BaL/Act 100-270 217
406,ODD GENERAL FUND TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND TRAFFIC CONTROl SUPPORT BIll/ACT 12/91 ;SOX - 6/92 BaL/Act 100-270 210
351,760 GENERAL FUND MONTGOMERY SEWER FUND SEWER SERVICE SUPPORT BUDGET 12/91 ;SOX - 6/92 Balance 100-270 223
1,486,570 GENERAL FUND SEWER SERVICE FUND SEWER SERVICE SUPPORT BUDGET 12/91 ;SOX - 6/92 BaLance 100-270 225
50,000 GENERAL FUND WORKERS COMPENSATION OPERATING SUPPORT BIll/ACT 12/91 ;SOX - 6/92 Bal/Act 100-270 430
46, ODD GENERAL FUND UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE OPERATING SUPPORT BIll/ACT 12/91 ;SOX - 6/92 Bal/Act 100-270 432
400,000 GENERAL FUND ASSET SEIZURE FUND POLICE SUPPORT BUD/ACT 12/91 Actual < 50X - 6/92 Bal. 100-270 218
103,000 GENERAL FUND PUBLIC LIAB. TRUST FUND OPERATING SUPPORT BIll/ACT 12/91 asox - 6/92 Bal/Act 100-270 431
67,627 GENERAL FUND CORP YARD RELOCATION DIF CREDIT (ROLLING STOCK) BIllGET 12/91 Full 8IIIOUI1t 100-270 804
404,740 GENERAL FUND GOLF COURSE LOAN REPAYMENT BUDGET 12/91 Full Amount 100-271 215
400, ODD GENERAL FUND OTAY VALLEY FUND LOAN REPAYMENT BUDGET 12/91 Full Amount 100-271 994
556,145 GENERAL FUND SEWER SERVICE FUND PUBLIC LIABILITY REIMB BUDGET 12/91 Full Amcult 100-270 225
70,330 GENERAL FUND BAYFRONT/TC PROJ PUBLIC LIABILITY REIMB BUDGET 12/91 Full Amcult 100-270 99D
........-----
4,537,172
~ <357,000) DEBT SERVICE FUND 300 GENERAL FUND 1987 CERT. OF PART. ACTUAL 12/91 PlY Sales Tax Inc. 100-270 300
(222,502) BAYFRONT CONSERVANCY GENERAL FUND BCT SUPPORT - LOAN BUDGET 7/91 Full Ano>unt-------> L~ 100-271 415
~ <33,640) PARKING METER FUND GENERAL FUND PARKING CONTROl BUDGET 7191 Full Ano>unt 100-270 230
-_.----------
, 1 3,924,030
1'2 (406,000) GENERAL FUND TRAFFIC SAFETY FUND TRAFFIC CONTROL SUPPORT BIll/ACT 12/91 ;SOX - 6192 Bal/Act 210-270 100
(54,110) BOND INTEREST & REDEMPT GOLF CWRSE DEBT SERVICE BIllGET 7/91 Full -.nt . 6/92 AJE 215-270 305
(404,740) GENERAL FUND GOLF CWRSE FINAL LOAN REPAYMENT BIllGET 12/91 Full Amount 215-271 100
-.-----.---
3 (458,850)
4 (115,000) GENERAL fUND CA. LIBRARY SERVICES LIBRARY SERVICE SUPPORT BIll/ACT 12/91 ;SOX - 6192 Bal/Act 216-270 100
5 (80,000) GENERAL FUND PUBLIC LIBRARY FUND LIBRARY SERVICE SUPPORT BIll/ACT 12/91 ;SOX . 6192 Bal/Act 217-270 100
6 (400,000) GENERAL FUND ASSET SEIZURE FUND POLICE SUPPORT BIll/ACT 12/91 Actual < 50X - 6192 Bal. 218-270 100
7 (351,760) GENERAL fUND MONTGOMERY SEWER fUND SEWER SERVICE SUPPORT BIllGET 12191 ;SOX - 6/92 Balance 223-270 100
(1,486,570) GENERAL FUND SEWER SERVICE fUND SEWER SERVICE SUPPORT BIllGET 12/91 ;SOX . 6/92 Balance 225.270 100
(556,145) GENERAL fUND SEWER SERVICE fUND PUBLIC LIABILITY REIMB BIllGET 12191 - Full Amcult 225-270 100
..................--
8 (2,042,715 )
9 33,640 PARKING METER FUND GENERAL fUND PARKING CONTROl BIllGET 7/91 full -"t 230-270 100 ["Tl
><
:c
~
co
~
-1
co
05/10/91
CITY OF CHULA VISTA OTHER FIHANCING SOURCES & USES FY 1991-92
REF
AMOUNY
TO
FRON
PURPOSE
&ASIS
SCHEDULE
REF'
REF'
s==s.a.=z=====_===._.=...=....._.:======._.=====================================================_=:================...=z=...zz==_..:......_===:=:_...=================._
453,020 DEBT SERVICE FUND 300 &AYFRONT/TC PROJECT 19B7 CERT. OF PART(PRKG FAC) BUDGET 12/91 Full Amount 300-270 990
357,000 DEBT SERVICE FUNO 300 GENERAL FUNO 19B7 CERT. OF PART. ACTUAL 12/91 P/Y Soles To. Inc 300-270 100
450,000 OEBT SERVICE FUNO 300 TOWN CENTER II PROJ. 19B7 CERT. OF PART. ACTUAL 12/91 P. To. Inc. - 6/92 Bol. 300-270 992
~........_.._-
10 1,260,020
11 54,110 BONO INTEREST & REOEMPT GOLF COURSE OEBT SERVICE BUDGET 7/91 Full AlM>unt . 6/92 AJE 305-270 215
12 (50,000) GENERAL FUND WORKERS CONPENSATION OPERATING SUPPORT BUD/ACT 12191 asox - 6/92 Bol/Act 430-270 100
13 (103,000) GENERAL FUNO PUBLIC LIAB. TRUST FUND OPERATING SUPPORT BUD/ACT 12191 asox - 6/92 Bol/Act 431-270 100
14 (46,000) GENERAL FUND UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE OPERATING SUPPORT BUD/ACT 12191 asox - 6/92 Bel/Act 432-270 100
15 (67,627> GENERAL FUND CORP YARO RELOCATION DIF CREDIT BUDGET 12191 - Full 8IllOUI1t 804-270 100
222,502 &AYFRONT CONSERVANCY GENERAL FUNO BCT SUPPORT . LOAN BUDGET 07/91 Full Amount----Loen 415-271 100
~ 16 ___u;~:~~- BAY FRONT CONSERVANCY BAYFRONT/TC PROJECT BCT SUPPORT - LOAN BUDGET 07/91 Full Amount----Loon 415-271 990
~ DEBT SERVICE FUND 980 &AYFRONT/TC PROJECT 1986 TAX ALLOCATION BONOS BUD/ACT 10/91 asox - 04/92 AJE Aet/Exp 980-270 990
17 3,ln,600
,
~ (168,730) BKrFRONT CONSERVANCY &AYFRONT/TC PROJECT BCT SUPPORT . LOAN BUDGET 07/91 Full _t-u-Loon 990-271 415
(453,020) OEBT SERVICE FUND 300 &AYFRONT/TC PROJECT 1987 CERT OF PART (PRKG FAC) BUDGET 12191 Full _t 990-270 300
(3,ln,600) DEBT SERVICE FUND 980 &AYFRONT/TC PROJECT 1986 TAX ALLOCATION BONDS BUD/ACT 10/91 asox . 04/92 AJE Act/Exp 990-270 980
(70,330) GENERAL FUND &AYFRONT/TC PROJ PUBLIC LIABILITY REINB BUDGET 12191 - Full Amount 990-270 100
......................-
lB (3,864,680)
19 (450,000) DEBT SERVICE FUND 300 TOWN CENTER II PROJ 19B7 CERT OF PARTICIPATION ACTUAL 12/91 P.To. Inc.-06/92 Bolene. 992-270 300
20 (400,000) GENERAL FUND OTAY VALLET FUND LOAN REPAYMENT BUDGET 12191 . Full _t 994-271 100
0
RESOLUTION NO.~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ADOPTING AN APPROPRIATION LIMIT FOR
THE FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 1992
The Ci ty Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the Gann Initiative or Proposition 4, hereby
referred to as Article XIIIB of the Constitution of the State of
California, was passed by the people, and
WHEREAS, Article XIIIB mandated an
on various units of government, including
Vista, and
appropr ia tions
the City of
limit
Chula
WHEREAS, that limit has been calculated by the Finance
Department of the City of Chula Vista using data provided by the
State Department of Finance, and
WHEREAS, the City Counci 1 of the City of Chula vis ta
desires to formally adopt that appropriations limit for the City.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Chula Vista that in accordance with Article XIIIB of the
Constitution of the State of California the appropriations limit
for the City of Chula Vista for the fiscal year ending June 30,
1992 is $49,635,708.
0065a
Bruce M.
Attorney
Presented by
Lyman Christopher, Director
of Finance
3a8 - i
m
PAI\C!I() !)U, QC)'
nn Il\)\.. )V]].) ,Wt
~\lll)'j\L lilY
RECEIVED
(.',\ l)'ll'l')()-bhFi
(h I q) 477 4117
'91 JJN 18 P 1 :1 4
June 18, 1991
Ct'lY IY '''', ;. "'j ,j1'
. 1;....1 \.~., "jLF_. "i '_) 1"-,
CITY Ct', ";)".~, n",c,\"t"
..Lj,,\ ,_, '..'1 . J_
The Honorable Tim Nader and City Council Members
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Re: SPA III - Tentative Tract Map No. 90-2
(Hearing of June 18, 1991)
Dear Mayor Nader and City Council Members:
The Rancho del Rey Partnership respectfully requests that Agenda Item No. 31
be continued to the July 9, 1991 City Council meeting. The purpose of this
request is to allow Rancho del Rey further time to review staff recommendations.
Thank you for your consideration.
Sincerely,
RANCHO DEL REY PARTNERSHIP
~ 6~~e~~4- ~
Kenneth Baumgartner
Executive Vice President
KBjdlp
cc: Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk
Bob Leiter, Planning Director
COUNCIL BUDGET DECISIONS
General Fund
Previous Iv approved by Council
Public Works (1400)
$ 6,300
Fire Stn 2 Tank
Parks & Rec (1500) ($ 33,950) Senior Info
Ron-Departmental (720) $100,000 Computer Loan program advance,
to be reimbursed with interest
RecODDDended for ADproval
Public Works (1400 ) $ 5,510
Parks & Rec (1500) ($ 17,430)
Public Works (1400 ) $ 50,000
Police (1000) ($ 50,000)
Asphalt/Chip Bid adjustment,
see items 20 & 21 on Agenda
Rohr Pool closure
Graffiti Program
Consolidation of Graffiti
Program in Public Works
Previous Iv approved bv Council
Special and Other Funds
Open Space (585)
Open Space (567)
$ 20,870
$ 7,110
RecODDDended for approval
Open Space (568)
Eastlake Mtce
Bel Air Ridge
($ 17,590) Water Conservation
Equip Replacement (705) $ 20,000
Central Garage (700)
Public Works
(1400/Gas Tax)
Vehicle Replacement
($ 25,410) Input Correction
$ 75,000 Graffiti Program
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
MEMORANDUM
DATE: June 18, 1991
TO: Honorable Mayor and City Council
VIA: John D. Goss, City Manager~
FROM: Dawn C. Herring, Budget Manager~
SUBJECT: Supplemental Budget Report - Action Summary
-----------------------------------------------------------------
-----------------------------------------------------------------
A total of 27 Supplemental Budget Reports have been submitted to
Council during the FY 1991-92 Budget Review Process. Many of these
reports were presented to you for your information only and require
no action. However, several reports were presented requesting
specific action to amend the proposed budget. The following is a
summary of the reports submitted and the action taken or action to
be taken at tonight's meeting.
10
11
1
Budget Graphics
2
Cost of expanding Tiny Tot
Program
3
Development of Park Utilization
Program
4
State Budget: Status of Funding
Cuts
5
Activity in Crime Suppression
6
Status Report of establishment
of City Architect
Effectiveness of Quarterly
Mailings
Employee Loans for Computer
purchase program
7
8
9
Graffiti and Gang Program
Equipment Replacement Budget
Consultant Contracts included
in FY 1991-92 budget
Info
Info
Info
Info
Info
Info
Info
Action
Info
Info
Info
No action needed
No action needed
No action needed
No action needed
No action needed
No action needed
No action needed
Tentatively
aPPLuv.,u $100,000
No action needed
No action needed
No action needed
12
13
14
15
16
17
19
20
21
22
23
24
Open Space Assessment Districts
Police Budget Referrals
Mandatory Social Security
Drainage Improvements North
of East Naples
Planning for Community Pride
Faire
Funding for Sr. Info and
Referral Center
18
Recommendations for Short
and Long term revenue
enhancements
Page 2
Meeting Date 6/18/92
Action
Info
Info
Info
Info
Action
Info
Action
Info
Action
Action
Action
Info
Tentatively
approved $27,980
No action needed
No action needed
No action needed
No action needed
Tentatively
reduced funding
by $33,950
No action at this
time
Tentatively
approved $50,000*
No action needed
Tentatively
agreed to file
report
Tentatively
approved $6,300
Tentatively
agreed to no
direct funding
for FY 1991-92
No action needed
* Town Manager will be addressed during the Agency Budget Review in
mid July
Town Manager Position
MTDB Right of Way
Beautification Master
Plan
Potential Approaches to
Council Staffing
Containment Boxes at Fire
Station #2
ADAPT Funding request
Budget Referral Photo
Radar
Page 3
Meeting Date 6/18/92
25 Report on Graffiti Action Reconunend
Control approval of
$125.000 total
budaet. $50.000
to be transferred
from the Police
Department and
$75.000 from Gas
Tax.
26 Child Care Licensing Info No action needed
27 Open Space Budget Info No action needed
Concerns
INCLUDING ALL PROPOSED CHANGES
--------OPERATING BUDGETS----------
PREPARED: 18-JUN-91
MGR. REC. COUNCIL APPRVD
1991-92 1991-92
CONTROL ACCOUNTS DEPARTMENT / ACTIVITY APPROPRIATION APPROPRIATION $$ CHANGE
-------------------- -------------------------- --------------- --------------- -----------
100-0105 CITY COUNCIL $282,180 $282,180
100-0111 THRU 0128 BOARDS & COMMISSIONS $62,770 $62,770
100-0130 THRU 0141 COMMUNITY PROMOTIONS $21,250 $21,250
100-0150 CITY ATTORNEY $614,850 $614,850
100-0160 THRU 0170 CITY CLERK/ELECTIONS $255,910 $255,910
100-0210 ADMINISTRATION $923,160 $923,160
100-0212 THRU 0215 MANAGEMENT SERVICES $1,277,690 $1,277,690
100-0250 THRU 0255 PERSONNEL/VOLUNTEERS $866,485 $866,485
100-0260 THRU 0261 COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT $1,039,730 $1,039,730
100-0420 THRU 0440 FINANCE/PURCHASING $1,321,470 $1,321,470
100-0621 THRU 0623 PLANNING $1,449,950 $1,449,950
100-0700 INSURANCE $878,830 $878,830
100-0730 NON-DEPARTMENTAL $290,140 $390,140 $100,000
100-0800 OTAY RANCH PROJECT $185,910 $185,910
100-1011 THRU 1100 POLICE $14,733,080 $14,683,080 ($50,000)
100-1211 THRU 1250 FIRE $6,247,320 $6,247,320
100-1301 THRU 1340 BUILDING & HOUSING $1,285,250 $1,285,250
100-1401 THRU 1471 PUBLIC WORKS/ENG $10,305,310 $10,442,120 $136,810
100-1511 THRU 1538 PARKS & RECREATION $4,316,310 $4,264,930 ($51,380)
100-1611 THRU 1695 LIBRARY $2,866,424 $2,866,424
-------------- -------------- -----------
TOTAL GENERAL FUND--OPERATING BUDGETS $49,224,019 $49,359,449 $135,430
--------------- --------------- -----------
--------------- --------------- -----------
CONTROL ACCOUNTS
216-2161
219-2190 THRU 2192
220-2220 THRU 222-2220
223-2230
225-2250
230-2300
235-2350
236-2360
237-2370
250-2503 THRU 2504
3000;3001;3050;3100;
5430;5450;5470;9800
415-4150
416-4160
551-5510 THRU 5680
575-5750
580-5800
585-5850
621-6210 THRU 6219
622-6220
646-6461
700-7000*
705-7050*
800-8010 THRU 8100
DEPARTMENT / ACTIVITY
CLSA - LITERACY GRANT
CRIMINAL JUSTICE GRANTS
SEWER CAPITAL FUNDS
MONTGOMERY SEWER MAINT
SEWER SERVICE FUND
PARKING METER FUND
TRANSIT SERVICE FUND
TRANSIT, ELDERLY/HANDI
TRANSIT, BAYFRNT TRLY
GAS TAX FUNDS
DEBT SERVICE FUNDS
NATURE INTERPRETIVE CNTR
BCT BOOKSTORE
OPEN SPACE DISTRICTS
TOWN CENTRE LNDSCP DIST I
BAY BLVD LNDSCP DIST
EASTLAKE MAINTENANCE DIST
TRANSPORTATION DIF
EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT RESERVE
COMMNTY DEVLP BLK GRNT FND
CENTRAL GARAGE FUND
EQUIPMENT RPLCMNT FUND
PUBLIC FACILITIES DIF
TOTAL OTHER FUNDS--OPERATING BUDGETS
GRAND TOTAL ALL FUNDS--OPERATING BUDGETS
--------SPECIAL REVENUE----------
MGR. REC.
1991-92
APPROPRIATION
$27,200
$124,430
$2,000
$640,600
$2,863,160
$259,930
$189,940
$284,960
$44,350
$1,765,204
$7,522,630
$416,400
$76,900
$1,259,380
$52,460
$11,890
$72,340
$361,080
$12,000
$648,424
$1,214,270
$830,000
$263,376
$18,942,924
$68,166,943
COUNCIL APPRVD
1991-92
APPROPRIATION
$27,200
$124,430
$2,000
$640,600
$2,863,160
$259,930
$189,940
$284,960
$44,350
$1,765,204
$7,522,630
$416,400
$76,900
$1,248,900
$52,460
$11,890
$93,210
$361,080
$12,000
$648,424
$1,188,860
$850,000
$263,376
$18,947,904
$68,307,353
$$ CHANGE
($10,480)
$20,870
($25,410)
$20,000
$4,980
$140,410
--------------- --------------- -----------
--------------- --------------- -----------
* AMOUNT APPROPRIATED IN OTHER FUNDS AND SHOWN HERE FOR DISPLAY PURPOSES ONLY
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
Meeting Date
3:1
6/18/91
ITEM TITLE:
Public Hearing:
a) Consideration of Water Conservation Plan and
Air Quality Improvement Plan for Rancho del
Rey SPAs II and III;
b) Consideration of Rancho del Rey sectional
Planning Area III Design Guidelines
c)
PCS-90-02: Request to subdivide 404.9 acres
known as Rancho del Rey sectional Planning
Area III, Chula vista Tract No. 90-02 located
between East "H" Street and Telegraph Canyon
Road, immediately south of Rancho del Rey SPA
I; Rancho del Rey Partnership
Resolution
Recertifying that the Final EIR-89-l0 for
Rancho del Rey SPA III has been prepared
in compliance with CEQA, the State CEQA
Guidelines and the environmental review
procedure of the city of Chula vista
Approving the Water Conservation Plan for
Rancho del Rey SPAs II and III with
amendments per Attachment 1
Resolution
Resolution
Approving the Air Quality Improvement
Plan for Rancho del Rey SPAs II and III
Resolution
Approving the Design Guidelines for
Rancho del Rey SPA III
Resolution
Approving the tentative subdivision map
for Rancho del Rey SPA III
Resolution
Amending the CEQA Findings for EIR-89-l0,
Rancho del Rey SPA III
Resolution
Amending the Mitigation
Program for EIR-89-l0, Rancho
III
Director of Planning pt
City Manager g (4/sths Vote: Yes _ No -1L)
Monitoring
del Rey SPA
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
3/-1
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date 6/18/91
The applicant, Rancho del Rey Partnership, has submitted a
tentative map for the Sectional Planning Area (SPA) III Plan to
subdivide approximately 405 acres into residential lots, open space
areas, a school lot, a park, and a community purpose facility lot.
The project is bounded on the north by East "H" Street and Rancho
del Rey SPA I, on the south by Telegraph Canyon Road, on the west
generally by Paseo Ladera and existing development, and on the east
generally by Buena vista Way (Exhibit 1 attached).
Included for your consideration are the Air Quality Improvement and
Water Conservation Plans prepared for Rancho del Rey SPAs II and
III as directed by city Council, the tentative maps for the three
phases of SPA III, and the Design Guidelines. The Design
Guidelines were presented for informational purposes at the time of
SPA Plan review and are presented at this time for adoption.
Rancho del Rey SPA III is the final sectional Planning Area for the
EI Rancho del Rey Specific Plan. The SPA I plan was approved in
1987 and is now under construction. The SPA II plan was approved
in 1989 and is also under construction. Rancho del Rey SPA III was
approved in January, 1991.
Your Council previously certified EIR-89-10 and the associated
mitigation monitoring program in its consideration of the sectional
Planning Area Plan for Rancho del Rey SPA III. Additional
mitigation measures are proposed with the air and water plans.
Therefore, amendments to the CEQA Findings and the Mitigation
Monitoring Program are required. A more complete discussion of
these environmental documents is contained in the Discussion
section below.
RECOMMENDATION
1. Recertify that the Final EIR-89-10 for Rancho del Rey SPA III
has been prepared in compliance with CEQA, the State CEQA
Guidelines and the environmental review procedure of the city
of Chula Vista;
2. Adopt a resolution approving the Water Conservation Plan for
Rancho del Rey SPAs II and III with the following amendments:
Amendment No. 1 Table 1-2 on page 3; Amendment No. 2
Pages 31 and 32 (Amendments are contained in Attachment 1 to
this report);
3. Adopt a resolution approving the Air Quality Improvement Plan
for Rancho del Rey SPAs II and III;
4. Adopt a resolution approving the Design Guidelines prepared
for Rancho del Rey SPA III;
3/- ~
Page 3, Item
Meeting Date 6/18/91
5. Based on the Findings and Conditions in the attached draft
city council Resolution, approve the tentative subdivision map
for Rancho del Rey SPA III;
6. Adopt a resolution amending the CEQA Findings for EIR-89-10,
Rancho del Rey SPA III; and
7. Adopt a resolution amending the Mitigation Monitoring Program
for EIR-89-10, Rancho del Rey SPA III.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATIONS
On March 31, 1991, the Parks & Recreation Commission approved the
concept park plan.
On May 6, 1991, the Resource Conservation commission reviewed the
tentative map and had no comment.
On May 8, 1991, and on May 22, 1991, the city Planning commission,
held public hearings to consider the air and water plans, the
design guidelines and the tentative map. On May 22nd the
commission unanimously recertified EIR-89-10, and recommended
approval of the design guidelines and provisional approval of the
tentative map for Rancho del Rey SPA III. While the Commission
reviewed and considered both the Air Quality Improvement Plan and
the Water conservation Plan, no action was taken. The provisional
tentative map approval is based on both the air and water plans,
and the subsequently amended CEQA Findings and Mitigation
Monitoring Program, being approved by the City Council.
DISCUSSION
Rancho del Rev Sectional Plannino Area (SPA) III Plan
The Rancho del Rey SPA III Plan is included as Exhibit 2 attached.
The plan is intended to show the general location of all proposed
uses and the general circulation system. It details that within
the 405 acres of SPA III, there are proposed a maximum of 1,380
dwelling units (314 single family conventional units at 2-4 and 4-6
dwelling units per acre; 250 single family cottage units at 4-6 and
6-8 dwelling units per acre; 228 townhouse units at 8-12 dwelling
units per acre; and 588 specialty housing units at 4-6, 6-8 and 8-
12 dwelling units per acre). Also included in the plan is a 26.1
acre junior high school site, a 10.8 acre park site, a 1.9 acre
community purpose facility site and 148.3 acres of open space.
This SPA plan was approved with conditions at the city Council
hearing of January 15, 1991. (A more complete analysis of the
subdivision lot designations is found in Section D. ANALYSIS,
following this Discussion section.)
3/- '3
Paqe 4, :Item
Meetinq Date 6/18/91
Subdivision Structure and Desiqn
Rancho del Rey SPA III is planned to be a residential community
with a diversity of housing types which will become available to
families and individuals with various income levels and housing
needs. Eighty-six acres of Specialty Housing is located in the
northern portion of the plan, immediately south of East "H" Street.
A variety of housing types will be included in the development of
this area as a retirement community. Precise plan approval will
further detail specific requirements and provisions for this lot.
The single family units in SPA III are generally located in the
center of the plan and have been designed to relate to existing
adjacent single family units. The area located in the southeastern
portion of the plan will interface with existing multi family
development to the east and with the park and open space systems to
the south and west. The open space system in Rancho del Rey SPA
III includes over 148 acres consisting mostly of canyon and slopes
covered in coastal sage scrub. Trail and pedestrian path systems
will be provided along East "H" Street, in the south leg of Rice
Canyon, along Paseo Ranchero and in the open space areas north of
Telegraph Canyon Road. These trails and pedestrian paths result in
an added recreational benefit for the area.
Gradinq
The EI Rancho del Rey Specific Plan set the limit for developable
areas and open space areas. In addition, the Specific Plan
included a series of findings acknowledging that development of the
project site under the adopted Specific Plan would require
substantial landform alteration. At the time of SPA Plan approval,
alternative grading concepts that alleviated amounts of grading in
open space areas and reduced heights of cut and fill slopes were
presented and made part of project approval.
Development areas are located on the higher elevations or plateaus,
while the canyons and slopes remain primarily in open space with
some recreational uses such as trails. The Rancho del Rey SPA III
Plan calls for a balanced cut and fill grading program of
approximately 4.0 million cubic yards. Typical cuts and fills will
range between 10 and 20 feet. Many slopes will be retained in a
natural state in the open space areas. Those graded slopes that
encroach the open space areas will be revegetated with native
species.
Grading shown on the tentative maps is consistent with the
alternative grading concept plan and maintains the areas set for
development and open space by the Specific Plan. A condition is
recommended for tentative map approval that requires grading
proposals to be reviewed by the City Engineer for consideration of
balanced cut and fill, utilization of appropriate soil types,
3/- Y
Page 5, Item
Meeting Date 6/18/91
effective landscaping and revegetation where applicable. Grading
is to occur in separate phases unless a single phase operation is
approved with the grading plan.
An area of potential concern is the grading and drainage occurring
on lots 71, 72 and 89 of Phase 2, unit 1. In these areas, the
subdivision must meet and interface with existing development and
grading will need to be accommodated on site. In order to provide
the largest possible pad area and avoid a difficult terrain
situation of open drainage channels on residential lots, staff
prefers that the grading and drainage plans detailing these lots
provide for spot drainage interceptors to catch the water and carry
it underground. This may require retaining walls and further grade
analysis. A recommended condition of approval requires that no
negative grading or drainage impacts occur to the off site
properties adjacent to these lots.
Circulation
Access to the subdivision is provided by Paseo Ranchero from either
East "H" street to the north, Telegraph Canyon Road to the south,
or via East "J" street from the west. The EI Rancho del Rey
Specific Plan designates Telegraph Canyon Road and East "H" Street
as prime arterials, Paseo Ranchero as a 4 lane collector and East
"J" street as a 2 lane residential collector.
The proposed tentative map and improvements for these streets are
consistent with the SPA Plan, Specific Plan, and General Plan
designations. Conditions of SPA approval and the Public Facilities
Financing Plan (PFFP) require development of SPA III to be
consistent with any adopted Eastern Chula vista Transportation
Phasing Plan. This is also made a condition of tentative map
approval. The PFFP also requires completion of East "J" Street to
connect with existing improvements to the west.
An item of concern raised at the City Council hearing on the SPA
regarded the level of service at the intersection of Pas eo del Rey
and East "H" street. It was determined that a right turn lane
would be required should conditions warrant the addition. However,
given the open space canyon slope that is located immediately
adjacent to the right-of-way and the substandard street width
already established, there may be substantial impact associated
with the addition of the turn lane. A condition of tentative map
approval provides that the developer enter into an agreement to
provide a right turn lane at the intersection of Paseo del Rey and
East "H" Street, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, should
it be determined to be necessary.
~/-S
Page 6, :Item
Meeting Date 6/18/91
The Metropolitan Transit and Development Board (MTDB) has provided
comment on the transit alternatives provided by Rancho del Rey SPA
III (Attachment 2). While the design of the project creates
neighborhoods and is sensitive to natural topography, the
circuitous streets and cul-de-sacs are not as easily adapted to
transit operation as much as the traditional interconnecting grid
system of streets. MTDB recommendations and recommendations from
the Air Quality Improvement Plan include pedestrian pathways
through ends of cul-de-sacs that would connect to adjacent streets,
adequate public rights-of-way at intersections along major
arterials for future bus stops, and park and ride facilities where
feasible to encourage car pooling. These have been incorporated
into the conditions of approval.
Low and Moderate Income Housinq
The Housing Element requires that subdivisions of over 50 dwelling
units provide 5% of the total project unit count as affordable
units for low-income families and 5% of the total project unit
count for moderate-income families. In August, 1990, the city
council approved an agreement concerning this requirement and how
it will be met in the Rancho del Rey specific Plan area. The
agreement states that Rancho del Rey has satisfied in full the
moderate income housing requirement of 322 units by the
construction of multi-family units in the Rancho del Rey specific
Plan area. The goal for low income units has been partially met.
The agreement also states that the additional 23 (minimum) low
income units will be provided in SPA III if a reasonable area for
such units is available. If no such site is available in SPA III,
it was agreed that an alternate site within the City may be
approved. A condition has been placed on tentative map approval
that prior to first final map approval, the applicant shall present
a schedule demonstrating how compliance with the low income housing
requirement will be met.
Specialtv Housinq Area
The specialty Housing Area, shown on the tentative map as Phase 1,
will be developed as a retirement community, creating a village
atmosphere for residents in a variety of housing types. The
precise design of the development is unknown at this time.
However, the conceptual grading plan, made a part of SPA Plan
approval, provides the basic footprint of the pad and slope areas
and the circulation. The Design Guidelines discuss the desired
concepts to be used in developing the site. SPA Plan approval and
recommended tentative map conditions of approval require the
adoption of a Precise Plan prior to development of the parcel.
Another recommended condition requires an agreement be entered into
by the developer that the parcel be developed specifically for
senior housing.
~/-~
.page 7, Item
Meeting Date 6/18/91
At the meeting of January 15, 1991, council expressed concern that
there be guarantees in place regarding the development of this land
for senior use. specific details of financial arrangements are
more properly handled in a development agreement, which is
currently being prepared by the developer and staff. The
requirement for Precise Plan approval will provide the City
adequate review of the density, circulation, open space and
interface of the retirement community with the surrounding areas.
In addition, a condition has been included that requires an
agreement be entered into by the developer and the city, prior to
recordation of final map, that the parcel will be developed
specifically for senior housing.
Communitv Purpose Facilities
The Community Purpose Facility Task Force was created by the city
council to study the need for community facilities in the City of
Chula vista. The Task Force has made specific recommendations to
the City council for a minimum acreage requirement of 1.39 acres of
Community Purpose Facility land per 1,000 persons. This minimum
acreage requirement was recently adopted as a City standard.
An analysis of the projected population for SPAs I, II and III
combined, based on unit types, yields that 16.12 acres of community
purpose facility land is required. Actual acreage provided within
the boundaries of SPAs I, II and III, including the 1.1 net acre
site proposed in SPA III, totals 11.2 acres. The deficit of
approximately 4.92 acres may be made up by considering an out
parcel immediately adjacent to SPA III at the southeast corner of
Pas eo Ranchero and East "H" Street. This property, owned by the
Rancho del Rey Partnership, is currently in negotiations for sale
to a church community. Condi tions of tentative map approval
include the requirement that compliance with the Community Purpose
Facility Ordinance be demonstrated prior to first final map
approval. The applicant is proceeding with a SPA amendment and
appropriate rezoning to designate the 4.92 acres for Community
Purpose land use.
Park Dedication
The Tentative Maps for Rancho del Rey SPA III provide for a 10.80
acre (gross) neighborhood park located on the south side of East
"J" Street adjacent to the junior high school. This is consistent
with the approved SPA Plan for the project. The Park Land
Dedication Ordinance (PLDO) requires 12.5 acres of park land based
on projected population and current PLDO application. After
sUbtracting the area with slopes greater than 5:1, the net useable
acreage of the neighborhood park is 10.25. In addi tion to
requiring fees and/or additional improvements to make up the
shortage of park land, joint use of recreational facilities located
'3/-7
Page 8, Item
Meeting Date 6/18/91
on the park and school grounds will serve the recreational needs of
the community. The design of both the park and school have taken
joint use of facilities into consideration. Facilities located on
the school grounds to be available for public use include tennis
courts, basketball courts, hard courts and ball fields. Facilities
on the park property include tot lots, a par course, soccer fields
and picnic areas. The park plan was approved by the Parks
commission on March 21st. In addition to the 10 acre park, SPA III
incorporates the trail system previously described.
Water Conservation Plan and Air Qualitv Improvement Plan
The city council directed that a Water Conservation Plan and Air
Quality Improvement Plan be prepared for Rancho del Rey SPAs II and
III pursuant to the General Plan and the Growth Management
policies.
Water
The purpose of the Water Conservation Plan is to respond to the
long term need to conserve water in new development. The
conservation plan is intended to be implemented over the life of
the project and to establish standards for future residents. Since
the immediate water crisis has eased, the two water districts
serving the Chula vista area have adopted less stringent water
cutbacks than what was anticipated at the time of SPA Plan
approval.
The Water Conservation Plan prepared for SPAs II and III and
included with this report, states that with water conservation
measures implemented on-site, projected water use for all areas of
SPAs II and III, including the park and school, is 400,000 gallons
of water per day. The water conservation measures outlined in the
Water Conservation Plan for SPAs II and III include on-site
measures (efficient fixtures and devices in the units, efficient
landscaping and irrigation, public awareness and education
programs) and a commitment to participate in any off-site
mitigation program adopted by the city. Such a program would be
designed to require new development to off-set all or a portion of
their new water demand by funding or providing new water
conservation improvements in older areas where efficient plumbing
or irrigation fixtures were not installed. Fees collected could
also be spent on studying or acquiring new or improved sources of
water (e. g., expanded water reclamation, desalinization, etc.).
The applicant shall comply with a City-approved water use offset
policy. Said policy may require one or more of the following:
1. Compliance with a regional water use offset program, to be
administered by the San Diego County Water Authority.
3( - fr
Page 9, Item
Meeting Date 6/18/91
2. Compliance with a locally administered water use offset
program;
3. Implementation of specific water use offset measures for this
project, if neither a regional or locally-administered water
use offset program is in place prior to issuance of building
permits for any portion of this project.
In the event that a City-approved water offset policy is not in
effect at the time building permits are issued, the requirements of
this plan shall be met through implementation of specific water
offset measures for this project, with the level of offsets and
specific measures to be approved by the City.
At their hearing on May 22, 1991, the Planning Commission expressed
concern that this project be held to a water policy enacted on a
regional or City-wide basis. Since Chula vista is acting as a
forerunner in the water conservation program, they expressed the
desire that the City work with the water districts operating in the
city as well as with other jurisdictions to encourage a County-wide
program.
Air Qualitv
As discussed in the Air Quality Improvement Plan included with this
report, the most significant air quality improvement measures are
those policies and regulations established at the broadest
geographic level, i. e. State or Federal. However, measures
implemented on a City or project level can have a positive impact.
The Air Quality Improvement Plan prepared for Rancho del Rey SPAs
II and III includes mitigation measures suggested by the developer
and those recommended by the consultant reviewing the plan,
Stevens/Garland and Associates. These include pedestrian and
bicycle paths, jobs/housing balance, access to regional travel
systems, access to transit, educational programs to increase
awareness, and the provision of park-n-ride facilities.
Local and regional air quality regulations including the Air
Pollution Control District program are being drafted that will
supersede existing standards. SPA III is being reviewed in advance
of these programs. In addition, it is an in-fill project, being
surrounded by existing and approved development. The circulation
network and land use plan, which relate to existing topography and
surrounding land uses, were previously approved by the SPA. For
these reasons, a major re-design of the project to incorporate a
more transit oriented design is not feasible. However, the Air
Quality Improvement Plan recommended several improvement measures
with the project including a park-n-ride facility to help limit
individual car trips by encouraging car pooling and bus ridership.
In addition, SPA III will be subject to on-going monitoring
31-1
Page 10, Item
Meeting Date 6/18/91
programs inherent in the city's Transportation Phasing Plan and
Growth Management Program.
The Chula vista Transit study, recently adopted in concept by the
city council, has identified the need for a park-n-ride facility
near the intersection of East "H" street and Paseo Ranchero. The
location of a facility near this intersection would accommodate
population generated by the Rancho del Rey development. One factor
in siting a successful park-n-ride facility is maintaining a sense
of security and ease of access. In addition, establishing the
facility early on, with initial development, allows the facility to
become a part of the community and helps establish car pooling
habits at the outset. possible alternatives near this intersection
include the future library site, the church anticipated at the
southeast corner of Paseo Ranchero and East H street, and the
pilgrim Lutheran Church to the northeast. The Transit Coordinator
will be meeting with the applicant to determine the exact location
and design. The developer is being required to agree to improve a
park-n-ride facility to the satisfaction of the city Transit
Coordinator. In the future, park-n-ride facilities may be more
adequately addressed in the Public Facilities Financing Plan stage
of a development.
Desiqn Guidelines
The Design Guidelines are an integral part of the Rancho del Rey
SPA III Plan and development. They are intended to establish
minimum standards for the design and architectural character of
project. They are provided to ensure that the quality and
fundamental concepts established at the master planning stage are
maintained in the final phase of detailed planning and design.
The Design Guidelines were considered in their draft form to
evaluate the plan layout, lot configuration and open space
treatments found in the tentative map. The majority of the Design
Guidelines encompasses landscape design. Landscape zones are
proposed which promote drought tolerant/naturalized landscaping as
the predominant landscape theme. Other features of the landscape
design program include slope erosion control, natural open space
enhancement, irrigation standards, fuel modification landscaping,
landscaping and the interface between residential areas and public
areas. Revision sheets for the revised Design Guidelines have been
included with this report and would replace those presently in your
SPA III binder.
ReCvclinq Facilities
Concern has
opportunities
Currently, the
been expressed that provisions for recycling
be addressed with the approval of subdivisions.
City Conservation coordinator is working on programs
"31-/0
Page 11, Item
Meeting Date 6/18/91
for recycling but has not implemented specific requirements.
Laidlaw .Waste system, the waste collector for the City, provides
residential curbside pick up of recycled materials when the units
become occupied and service established. The applicant's Product
Development Committee is considering areas for recycling bin
storage within the single family units to further encourage the
program. provisions for recycling in the multi-unit areas will
also be pursued with the assistance of the city Conservation
Coordinator and addressed with Precise Plan review.
Environmental
A. Recertify the Final EIR-89-10
The city Attorney determined that the "tentative subdivision
map" for the above cited project is considered a "project"
under the California Environmental Quality Act and as such,
environmental review is required. As the Final Supplemental
Environmental Impact Report EIR-89-10 for Rancho del Rey SPA
III was certified by the Planning Commission at its meeting on
November 14, 1990, and was certified by council on January 15,
1991, and as the tentative map and SPA Plan for RDR III are
basically considered identical, the City Attorney has
determined that the recertification of EIR-89-10 should occur
prior to the tentative subdivision map being adopted.
For your information, the executive summary of EIR-89-10 which
you reviewed and certified is attached.
B. Amended CEQA Findings for EIR-89-10
subsequent to Council's adoption of the CEQA findings for EIR-
89-10 on Rancho del Rey SPA III, and in accordance with
Council's conditional approval of the RDR SPA III Plan, the
applicant submitted and the city reviewed studies of ways to
reduce net water usage of the proposed project and suggested
methods to improve air quality within the project. Based on
these studies, the CEQA findings have been modified, and the
revised findings are attached.
Air Quality was previously considered a significant impact at
a cumulative level and is still significant at the cumulative
level. Water use was previously considered insignificant at
a project level and at a cumulative level. Water is still
considered an insignificant impact at a project level and
significant at a cumulative level.
3/-1/
Page 12, Item
Meeting Date 6/18/91
c. Amended Mitigation Monitoring Program
A mitigation monitoring program for EIR-89-10, Rancho del Rey
SPA III, was adppted by the City Planning commission on
November 14, 1990, and by the City Council on January 15,
1991. Amendments have been made to the monitoring program.
Water use has been reduced and additional measures have been
added to further mitigate negative impacts to air quality.
In order to assure that these
the mitigation monitoring
accordingly.
items are in fact implemented,
program has been amended
ANALYSIS
The proposal is consistent with the Chula vista General Plan and
the adopted El Rancho del Rey Specific Plan and Rancho del Rey
sectional Planning Area III Plan. In addition, SPA III is in
compliance with the Chula Vista Growth Management Program as it is
included in the Development Phasing Forecast, (or the 5 to 7 year
program), and can be approved pursuant to the adoption of air
quality improvement and water conservation plans. The Rancho del
Rey SPA III Plan is included as Exhibit 2 attached. The plan is
intended to show the general location of all proposed uses and the
general circulation system. The actual tentative maps detail that
within the 405 acres of SPA III, there are proposed a maximum of
1,380 dwelling units (289 single family conventional units at 2-4
and 4-6 dwelling units per acre; 242 single family cottage units at
4-6 and 6-8 dwelling units per acre; town house units at 8-12
dwelling units per acre; and specialty housing units at 4-6, 6-8
and 8-12 dwelling units per acre). Also included in the
development is a 26.1 acre junior high school site, a 10.8 acre
park site, a 1.9 acre community purpose facility site and 148.3
acres of open space. This SPA plan was approved with conditions at
the city Council hearing of January 15, 1991.
According to the Chula vista Municipal Code, the purpose of the SPA
Plan in a PC Planned community zone is to provide for the orderly
pre-planning of large tracts of land containing a variety of land
uses which are under unified ownership or development control. The
Rancho del Rey SPA III site utilization Plan contains seven
residential planning areas divided into three development phases:
the specialty housing area is in phase one, the area west of Paseo
Ranchero is in phase two and the area east of Paseo Ranchero is in
phase three. The tentative map submitted for SPA III is consistent
with these development areas and phases. A lot summary of the
tentative map is as follows:
fI-I"-
Phase
unit SPA III Lot
Desig. No.
1
R-7
1-3
A-D
2
1
R-3
1-135
A-B
1-85
A
1-10
1
1-21
A-B
2
R-4
3
R-1
CF-1
R-1
4
3
1
R-2
1-144
A-B
1-157
A-B
1
A-B
1
1
A
2
R-5
3
R-6
4
S-1
P-1
Page 13, Item
Meeting Date 6/18/91
Area (AC) No. Proposed Use
Gross/Net Lots
90.6 / - 3
67.3 / - 4
30.5 / - 135
8.3 / - 2
13.9 / - 85
0.4 / - 1
2.8 / - 10
1.7/1.11
5.3 / - 21
40.9 / - 2
29.1 / - 144
8.9 / - 2
21.8 / - 157
1.1 / - 2
18.3/16.6 1
15.7 / - 2
26.1/23.4 1
11.3/10.0 1
1.2 / - 2
Multi-family res.
Open Space
sngl family res.
Open space
Sngl family res.
open Space
Sngl family res.
Community Fac.
sngl family res.
Open Space
Sngl family res.
Open Space
Sngle family res.
open space
MUlti-family res.
Open Space
Junior High
Park
Open Space
The Planning Department has concluded that the proposed map is
consistent with the EI Rancho del Rey SPA III plan and, therefore,
we are recommending approval subject to the conditions and findings
listed herein.
FISCAL IMPACT: Not applicable.
(RDR3CC.RPT)
31-13
.' /
,,/'
,
,',
,'. ,,-
, .
-,:
,
',1
.~ ,~ I
'",- "'1
!.
SPA BOUNDARIES
'.
,
\";:
:\
,.\
,
"
.'-,
",
'(.
'('
,\.
"
.~
,~;
OTIIY LI\ 1\
-.. I.... ~ ROAD
\
,.,-
(j
-
.'
~'.
,\
..\
I
\
,
i
.'
."-
~~ . ,'-
.. .
'1l1t.eGIlI\ . .- . - "
PllCot '.
IVyON "
",O<'\l)
o.
,
.
1~J!9d!2~r~yB!;y
:.l1;!4/lili
~~~~
.',.'--
!-.- r......
~ iI 4.......
I' ......
. U . ....,..
,,;0 n."'......,
__1-
~-~'!!~~
U' _o~__
. .~
. .-
oruo :II"'~l
--,-
,~~
===~,.,...
==-= ~_.
_~~l
--ft~~ o.Ul":lOtl
- .- -
~~- ~ ~-
OUt .. ...
,"4 .. ,W
UI' .. 'U'
... .. ...
... ... ...
... ... '"
'H' ...... .ou
.....1
... I
...
:::: I I
-;;;~T ;0U-
~.. -....--.--...
I ==-::.:=-:.: :::::.:.:.-:-..::.::
-.. ::~~' :'..:-=.: ::=.-:.:-=-~.:.-.=: ..--
.,........................
11J1
t:XHIBIT 1
anti
& A:su.~
L~'" !., ""
C
a3
J:
-
-
-
co
Q)
~
<(
C)
c
.-
c
c
co
a:
o
.-
't::
'0
Q)
0-
en
~; ;:- ~~/ ~~'.;~:''''''' \
""":.;'.... -........-.....,;......,;; ~\.,u$.\..\.\'" 2 \
...' '<.n~:-_.~,.^;...;c/':':uJ~' '.
C.'~./'h-.'.'.:o...'_.,.<tj.";.. _' /^ ,
"1',"') "- ''''" ~'.. '..... t" , " '. "
,"'... "'r'I'I!~~....., -'v.. _ '"_., '"...
'<'--:'''<-'''''.J('f",,<,.;~:v.._ 7-;:.I.~, . ...
'T~'-JI'.~~/"<""',....f C^' \ ~~
..' ---. ~/"''-'''' :=- "- en
,..':.....~."\c:::~,.-:;-:.,._ ""~\~:o;..".,.r ...-"~----- 0
\-., I."i''''' '.~_ v 0 , \
';'co<.\\,~\;/ : \~DV , VV '\'''- "
'.--,~,~~~ " ; '"
""';~, .--. ., , ,
;'~~~1~~('h~;/ ~, ,
-;;~'''-;'Jc{n~J-J;: r.no u.
.....( .... '-I' -, \
\~r. n....... '(/J
\ .i ~("~"~ \~
C;t:..\ I 'r",. ~\
-.. "t::...:',I,...-"!c.-;'\c.-: u:.
'\~""J.r,:~1 .......,t.....(/) \
\ . ..t.~...~ \.- t.1-w.....
\ \ ~~'l'"-)....,\.......:;t~~>". ~
\\ \ ',1 ,i: c.:.. '_.
.. ....._~~
\ ....:-.- '~-=-
) '?tv
//"\ \
\\
\ ,
\\
'...... \ \
~,~\
\ ,
\\\
~\ ,
\~. ;;f.
il "V)
\-}; . .
J't
==11
I,
[' (jj
!\
, I:
''--I
i"-l
I I'
!j"
I:
I
I
-_-.J
1 '1 r--7
II I: :
(~) /! /
I' .
/1 /
/ l ,
lien .
I, oj.
I , ,
::1 / i
I: ,
'I I
..
~ ~
<<
:;
'i
~ ~
..
i i
'<
; !
~ :
<:
00
:!
".
h
=:
:i t ~
:iil
~: '!
; " a
. . .
-: ~ ;
o _.g
i ~ ~
~ ~ ~
s. ; :
~ - j
: ~ 1
~ ! ~
c i <i:
e...l.,
~ -; :;
: ~ ~ ~ i
.;: uu
J:
en
en
o
,
j
,
,
en )
0,
,
/
,
,
/
,
,
/
,
,
/
. ,
I '~.
l....~,j/
I
. ,I
-'I
0:
,
.
"
"
.
, ~
. ~
0
. ~
~ ~
o
~
N
. "
UII
~:I
oil
~
~
~
~ : I ~
I
~ ~I
.
.
-:1)(1)'
~W.
o ~"
:r (,J~
0.,
I
~
1
, N
" . =i:
~ ~ ~ !. ~
~
0 "
"
~
~
.
~
I
U I
~ ,
-w
U~
w_
~ -,
~Q'
ZU
s.u
~;Jl
0<,
Q.
<~
'f
.
"
1
e
:0
..
.
'l'
:
"-
'N
3 "-
~ ..
~ :4
j j
. t
.
.
.
. .
~ ~
~
.
.:t
;; ,
. . . .
. ~ ~ 5
u ~ ~
"
j
.
~
;;
.
~
j
I
.
a:
z"
I~~:
'31-b~~
;;
,
.
.
~
,
.
u
C.
~
"
;
i
~ .
~
. u
.
I .:t
;; . !
.
. ~ .3
. ~
e
.
.
,
.
~
.
.
~
.
~
e
.
.
..
~
;;
U
C.
~
"
!>
;;
u
"..
~s
e.
0,
".
e"
.
.
f"
~j~
U.. ~
N
I-
iD
:E
X
w
r1
~
~
,
eU
~ ~&:
lai
~
~j
a~
~- .
RESOLUTION NO. IltRI~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA RECERTIFYING THAT THE FINAL
EIR-89-l0 FOR RANCHO DEL REY SPA III HAS BEEN
PREPARED IN COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA ,THE STATE
CEQA GUIDELINES AND THE ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
PROCEDURE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, Rancho del Rey SPA III is the final Sectional
Planning Area for the El Rancho del Rey Specific Plan which was
approved in January, 1991; and
WHEREAS, on May 22, 1991, the planning Commission
unanimously recertified EIR-89-l0 and recommended approval of the
design guidelines and provisional approval of the tentative map
for Rancho del Rey SPA III.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula Vista does hereby recertify that the Final
EIR-89-l0 for Rancho del Rey SPA III has been prepared in
compliance wi th CEQA, the state CEQA Guidelines and the
environmental review procedures of the City of Chula Vista.
Robert A. Leiter, Director of
Planning
8968a
Bruce M. Boo aa d, Cl Y Attorney
Presented by
3/-ICt
RESOLUTION NO.~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE WATER CONSERVATION
PLAN FOR RANCHO DEL REY SECTIONAL PLANNING
AREAS (SPA) II AND III
WHEREAS, a duly verified Water Conservation Plan was filed
with the Planning Department of the City of Chula vista on January
8, 1991 by Rancho del Rey Partnership, and
WHEREAS, said Plan reviewed the proposed water usage of the
project and conservation measures to mitigate the water use impacts
associated with the development, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an advertised public
hearing on associated tentative subdivision map PCS-90-02 on May 8,
1991, and continued to May 22, 1991, and
WHEREAS, the city Council set the time and place for a hearing
on associated tentative subdivision map (PCS-90-02) and notice of
said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its
publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and
its mailing to property owners within 300 feet of the exterior
boundaries of the property at least ten days prior to the hearing,
and
WHEREAS, the hearing was held
advertised, namely 7: 00 p.m., June
Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before
hearing was thereafter closed, and
at the time and place as
18, 1991, in the Council
the City Council and said
WHEREAS, the City council found that the Water Conservation
Plan is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section 15262 of the State
CEQA Guidelines.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL finds as
follows:
1.
The Water Conservation Plan as modified to
attached amendments is in compliance with
Management Program adopted April 23, 1991; and
contain the
the Growth
2.
The Water Conservation Plan as modified to contain
attached amendments is in compliance with Ordinance 2248,
Growth Management Implementation Ordinance adopted April
1991; and
the
the
23,
3. The Water Conservation Plan as modified to contain the
attached amendments is in compliance with Condition No. 20 on
Rancho del Rey Sectional Planning Area Plan III (Council
Resolution No. 15993, dated March 5, 1991).
3/- 17
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE Water Conservation Plan, as
modified, for Rancho del Rey SPAs II and III is approved.
That a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the owners of
the property.
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA,
CALIFORNIA, this 18th day of June, 1991, by the following vote, to-
wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
Robert A. Leiter
Director of Planning
form b
Presented by
Bruce M. Boog
City Attorney
2
5/-;<6
AMENDMENT NO. 1
Table 1-2, page 3
Rancho del Rey SPA II and SPA III
Water Conservation Measures
On-site Measures
(This section remains the same.)
Off-site Measures
Full Ilartieipation in a City aIlflrO"leel .;ater eonDervationjlllitiqation
proqralll desiqneel to eff Det additional vater elemand aDDociated '.litR
Rffi; cORstruetion tRreliqh the retro fit of elder, leDD efficieRt
\/ateL fil1tureD eff site, aRd/or fURdiRq fOL RC\l DUIlplies er DoureeD
of \mter. The applicant shall complv with a citv-approved water
use offset policv. Said policv mav reauire one or more of the
followina:
~ compliance with a reaional water use offset proaram. to be
administered bv the San Dieao Countv Water Authoritv.
~ Compliance with a locallv administered water use offset
proaram (such proaram mav be administered bv the citv. water
district. or a combination of both):
~ Implementation of specific water use offset measures for this
proiect. if neither a reaional or local lv-administered water
use offset proaram is in place prior to issuance of buildina
permits for anv portion of this proiect.
In the event that a Citv-approved water offset policv is not in
effect at the time buildina permits are issued. the reauirements of
this plan shall be met throuah implementation of specific water
offset measures for this proiect. with the level of offsets and
specific measures to be approved bv the citv.
3
'3/-1':;
AMENDMENT NO. 2
Page 31, continuing onto page 32:
D. Offsite Mitigation Measures
Because of the crisis created by the multi-year drought in
California and the extreme short term water rationing/use
restrictions adopted to respond to the situation, new attention is
being given to formulating new policies which will conserve water
and allow for long term growth.
As noted in the preceding sections, although the SPA II and SPA III
projects implement a variety of water conserving practices, the
construction and occupation of these projects will result in an
increased demand for water. The drought has demonstrated that
water is a finite resource and that current supplies cannot
reliably support current demands and continued growth. However,
growth is a major component of both the State's, and especially,
the local San Diego area economy. In order to accommodate growth,
while long term water supplies are evaluated and implemented, new
programs to more efficiently use the available water are being
proposed.
An initial area of focus is the retro-fit of plumbing fixtures and
landscape irrigation in existing development. According to
statistics compiled by the Construction Industry Federation (CIF) ,
retro-fitting the shower and toilet fixtures in approximately 2.8
older homes would save the amount of interior-use water required by
one new home (additional older homes would be required to off-set
outdoor water use at the new home). Thus a mitigation program
which collected fees to complete such conversions, or directly
required equivalent conversions, could allow a limited amount of
new development to occur without creating a net increase in water
demand. Comparable water savings could also be achieved by retro-
fitting irrigation systems of schools, parks, golf courses, etc.,
where significant conservation of irrigation water could be
achieved. This type of water consumption off-set program has been
conceptually approved by the San Diego County Water Authority.
Additional studies to determine the exact specifications, scope and
implementation process are now under way. In order to avoid
conflicting regulations and to maximize fairness, such a program
would need to implemented on a wide basis, preferably county-wide.
The City and local water district would provide input in the
4
3/- :?o
would need to implemented on a wide basis, preferably county-wide.
The city and local water district would provide input in the
establishment of the large scale program and would probably provide
local implementation.
As indicated earlier, the approval of the Rancho del Rey SPA III
Plan was conditioned to require a Water Conservation Plan which
reduced any impacts to the local water supply to an "insignificant"
level, as determined by the city Council. This is the first and,
so far, the only project to be so conditioned. ~t the time the
oOflditien \lac draftee, it ~:as iRtcYllyctCa. to rcftuirc a zcre net
iRerc~sc or ee~lctc \:atcr eeRoa~tiefl eff cct,bceauac He program,
adopteel pelicy 01" citl"\:ielc criteria euioteel to Be uoeel ao a
Dtand:lra. IIe\:c~,;E;.r, ae1di tianal Jlroj ceto rCEIucot ap13ro"'lalo and/ sr :l
broael Based miti~atieR/oonservatieR pro~ram io eleveleped,
"iRtJi~Rificant" i!) elrpecteel te Be aefiReel ao filII implemeRtation of
on oite eeRocr~atieR mcazurCD ana full participatioR in :lR eff oite
miti~atioR pr8~ram eRelorseel BY the city. The 8rA II aRd erA III
project!) .;ill fally comply .:ith the reqllirellleRts of a City approved
aRel/or sponsoreel .:ater c8RservatioRjmitigatioR program. To meet
this reauirement. the applicant shall complY with a city-approved
water use offset policy. Said policy may reauire one or more of
the followina:
~ Compliance with a reaional water use offset proaram. to be
administered bv the San Dieao County Water Authoritv.
~ Compliance with a local Iv administered water use offset
proaram (such proaram may be administered bv the city. water
district. or a combination of both):
~ Implementation of specific water use offset measures for this
proiect. if neither a reaional or locally-administered water
use offset proaram is in place prior to issuance of buildina
permits for anY portion of this proiect.
In the event that a City-approved water offset policy is not in
effect at the time buildina permits are issued. the reauirements of
this plan shall be met throuah implementation of specific water
offset measures for this proiect. with the level of offsets and
specific measures to be approved bY the city.
5
'3/- ~I
RESOLUTION NO. ~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE AIR QUALITY
IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR RANCHO DEL REY SECTIONAL
PLANNING AREAS (SPA) II AND III
WHEREAS, a duly verified Air Quality Improvement Plan was
filed with the Planning Department of the City of Chula vista on
January 28, 1991 by Rancho del Rey Partnership, and
WHEREAS, said Plan reviewed the impacts to air quality
anticipated by the project and measures to mitigate the impacts
associated with the development, and
WHEREAS, the Planning commission held an advertised public
hearing on associated tentative subdivision map PCS-90-02 on May 8,
1991 and continued to May 22, 1991, and
WHEREAS, the City Council set the time and place for a hearing
on associated tentative subdivision map (PCS-90-02) and notice of
said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its
publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and
its mailing to property owners within 300 feet of the exterior
boundaries of the property at least ten days prior to the hearing,
and
WHEREAS, the hearing was held
advertised, namely 7:00 p.m., June
Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before
hearing was thereafter closed, and
at the time and place as
18, 1991, in the Council
the city Council and said
WHEREAS, the City Council found that the Air
Improvement Plan is exempt from CEQA pursuant to Section
the State CEQA Guidelines.
Quality
15262 of
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL finds as
follows:
1. The Air Quality Improvement Plan as submitted is in compliance
wi th the Growth Management Program adopted Apr i I 23, 1991; and
2. The Air Quality Improvement Plan as submitted is in compliance
with Ordinance 2248, the Growth Management Implementation
Ordinance adopted April 23, 1991.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE Air Quality Improvement Plan
for Rancho del Rey SPAs II and III is approved.
That a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the owners of
the property.
1
"3/- ~t
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA,
CALIFORNIA, this 18th day of June, 1991, by the following vote, to-
wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
Presented by
Robert A. Leiter
Director of Planning
2
1/-.23
RESOLUTION NO.~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR
RANCHO DEL REY SPA III
The City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the Design Guidelines are an integral part of
the Rancho del Rey SPA III Plan and development which are
intended to establish minimum standards for the design and
architectural character of the project; and
quali ty
planning
planning
WHEREAS, said Guidelines are provided to ensure that the
and fundamental concepts established at the master
stage are maintained in the final phase of detailed
and design; and
WHEREAS, the Design Guidelines were considered in their
draft form to evaluate the plan layout, lot configuration and
open space treatments found in the tentative map; and
WHEREAS, the majority of the Design Guidelines encompass
landscape design with landscape zones proposed which promote
drought tolerant/naturalized landscaping as the predominant
landscape theme as well as slope erosion control, natural open
space enhancement, irrigation standards, fuel modification
landscaping, landscaping and the interface between residential
areas and public areas; and
WHEREAS,
the El Rancho del
Plan; and
the Design Guidelines are in conformance with
Rey Specific Plan and the Chula vista General
WHEREAS, the Design Guidelines will promote the orderly
development of the involved sectional planning area and ensure a
consistent quality of development in keeping with the fundamental
concepts established for the approved SPA.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula vista does hereby approve the Design Guidelines
for Rancho del Rey SPA III and does hereby impose them, among
others, as conditions of development.
Presented by
d, City Attorney
Robert A. Leiter, Director of
planning
8973a
3/- ~1I
RESOLUTION NO. ~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE TENTATIVE
SUBDIVISION MAP FOR RANCHO DEL REY SECTIONAL
PLANNING AREA (SPA) III, CHULA VISTA
TRACT 90-02
WHEREAS, a duly verified application for a tentative
subdivision map was filed with the Planning Department of the City
of Chula vista on November 8, 1989 by Rancho del Rey Partnership,
and
WHEREAS, said application requested the subdivision of
approximately 405 acres into residential lots, open space areas, a
school lot, park and community purpose facility lot, and
WHEREAS, the Planning commission held an advertised public
hearing on said project on May 8, 1991, and continued to May 22,
1991, and
WHEREAS, the City Council set the time and place for a hearing
on said tentative subdivision map application and notice of said
hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in
a newspaper of general circulation in the city and its mailing to
property owners within 300 feet of the exterior boundaries of the
property at least ten days prior to the hearing, and
WHEREAS, the hearing was held
advertised, namely 7:00 p.m., June
Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before
hearing was thereafter closed, and
at the time and place as
18, 1991, in the Council
the city Council and said
WHEREAS, the city Council recertified EIR-89-10, with
Statement of Overriding considerations, and associated Mitigation
Monitoring Program for Rancho del Rey SPA III.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE CITY COUNCIL finds as
follows:
Pursuant to section 66473.5 of the Subdivision Map Act, the
tentative subdivision map for Rancho del Rey sectional Planning
Area (SPA) III, Chula vista Tract no. 90-02, is found to be in
conformance with the various elements of the city's General Plan
based on the following:
1. The site is physically suitable for residential
development and the proposal conforms to all standards
established by the City for such projects.
1
'3/- 4'$
2. The design of the subdivision will not affect the
existing improvements -- streets, sewers, etc. -- which
have been designed to avoid any serious problems.
3. The project is in substantial conformance with the Chula
vista General Plan Element as follows:
a. Land Use - The project is consistent with the
General Plan, EI Rancho del Rey Specific Plan and
the SPA III Plan which designates the property PC -
Planned Community, with a variety of land uses and
residential densities.
b. Circulation - All of the on-site and off-site
public streets required to serve the subdivision
are consistent with the circulation element of
Chula vista General Plan and the circulation
proposed within the El Rancho del Rey Specific
Plan. Those facilities will either be constructed
or in-lieu fees paid in accordance with the Rancho
del Rey SPA III Public Facilities Financing Plan.
c. Housing - A low and moderate housing program with
an established goal of 5% low and 5% moderate will
be implemented subject to the approval of the
City's Housing Coordinator. Computation of the
satisfaction of this condition will include the
entire El Rancho del Rey Specific Planning Area.
d. Conservation and Open Space - The project provides
148.3 acres of open space, 36% of the total 404.9
acres. Grading has been limited on hillsides and
grading plan approval will require the revegetation
of slopes in natural vegetation. Approval of EIR-
89-10 included the adoption of a mitigation
monitoring program outlining the mitigation
measures required for project impacts on geology,
soils, biology, air, water, cultural resources,
land form, transportation and utility sources.
e. Parks and Recreation The project will be
responsible for the improvement of the 10 acre net
neighborhood park and payment of PAD fees or
additional improvements as approved by the Director
Parks and Recreation. In addition, a trail system
will be implemented through the south leg of Rice
canyon, connecting with other open space areas.
f. Seismic Safety - The Rancho del Rey site is crossed
by the La Nacion Fault Zone which has one prominent
fault, running north to south, with other potential
traces. The mitigation monitoring program adopted
2
'31-~6
with EIR-89-10 provides for measures to be taken to
mitigate the impacts of development in association
with the fault zone.
g. Safety - The site will be wi thin the threshold
response times for fire and police services. The
project will increase the need for additional
personnel, however, the City is planning to meet
that need with additional revenues provided by this
project.
h. Public Facilities Element This project is
obligated in the conditions of approval to provide
all on-site and off-site facilities necessary to
serve this project. In addition to that, there are
other regional facilities which this project (
together with SPAs I and II) is contributing to,
including a public library site, fire station site,
and fire training facility site. The subdivision
is also contributing to the otay Water District's
improvement requirements to provide terminal water
storage for this project as well as other major
projects in the eastern territories.
h. Noise - The units will be required to meet the
standards of the UBC with regard to acceptable
interior noise levels.
i. Scenic Highway - The project does not affect this
element of the General Plan.
j. Bicycle Routes - Bicycle paths are provided along
Telegraph Canyon Road, East "H" Street and Paseo
Ranchero Road as shown in the Circulation Element.
k. Public Buildings - No public buildings are planned
for the site. The project shall be subject to RCT
and DIF fees.
4. Pursuant to section 66412.2 of the Subdivision Map Act,
the Council certifies that it has considered the effect
of this approval on the housing needs of the region and
has balanced those needs against the public service needs
of the residents of the City and the available fiscal and
environmental resources. The development will provide
for a variety of housing types from single family
detached homes to attached single family and senior
housing. In addition, the addressment to providing a
percentage of low and moderate priced housing is in
keeping with regional goals.
3
31 - i'f; ).1
5. The configuration, orientation and topography of the site
partially allows for the optimum siting of lots for
passive or natural heating and cooling opportunities.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP for
Rancho del Rey SPA III, Chula vista Tract 90-02, is approved
subject to the following conditions:
General/Preliminarv
1. The Public Facilities Financing Plan shall be followed with
improvements installed in accordance with said plan or as required
to meet threshold standards adopted by the city of Chula vista.
In addition, the sequence in which improvements are constructed
shall correspond to any future East Chula vista Transportation
Phasing Plan adopted by the city. The City Engineer and Planning
Director may at their discretion, modify the sequence of
improvement construction should conditions change to warrant such
a revision.
2. All mitigation necessary to avoid significant effects itemized in
the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Environmental Impact Report
EIR-89-10 as required prior to Final Map approval, are hereby
incorporated as conditions of approval. The Director of Planning
may modify the sequence of mitigation at his discretion should
changes warrant such a revision.
3. The developer shall comply with the community Purpose Facility
Ordinance. The areas proposed to show compliance with said
ordinance shall be provided prior to approval of the first final
map. Areas of consideration for qualification must be within the
areas of SPAs I, II or III. Amendment to the El Rancho del Rey
Specific Plan and sectional Plan Areas may be necessary to
accomplish compliance.
4. Prior to final map approval for Phase 1, a Precise Plan shall be
approved by the city council detailing the development of the
Specialty Housing project. The precise plan shall include but is
not limited to: detailing the density of the various portions of
the project; identifying the amount of recreational and open space
facilities; detailing the financial arrangements available to
proposed tenants; identifying the age limits and any income
requirements of tenants; and showing the percent of the project
for sale or rent.
Streets. Riqhts-of-Wav and Improvements
5. Prior to any final map approval for Phase 2 or 3 or any unit
thereof, the developer shall obtain all necessary right-of-way
4
3/-~9
for the construction of the unimproved off site portion of
East "J" street west of Paseo Ladera, from River Ash Drive to
Red Oak Place.
6. The developer shall construct the unimproved off site portion
of East IIJII street west of Pas eo Ladera, from River Ash Drive
to Red Oak Place, to a Class II Collector standard, except
that the 5 foot sidewalk may be asphalt concrete instead of
portland cement concrete. The construction of these
improvements shall be guaranteed prior to final map approval
for Phases 2 or 3 or any unit thereof. The subdivider may
request the formation of a reimbursement district for these
off-site improvements in accordance with section 15.50 of the
Municipal Code.
7. The developer shall request the vacation of that portion of
paseo Marguerita as necessary to accomplish the design as
shown on the tentative map. said vacation shall be
accomplished prior to the approval of the final map for Phase
2, unit 3.
8. The off site portion of East "J" street adj acent to Buena
vista Way shall be granted in fee to the City for Open Space,
public utilities and other public uses. The grant of this
property shall be completed prior to approval of a final map
for Phase 3, unit 3. The developer shall enter into an
agreement to not oppose the inclusion of this property in Open
Space District # 20 (zone 7) prior to approval of any final
map for Rancho del Rey SPA III. The developer shall be
responsible for the costs associated with annexing this
property to Open Space District # 20.
9. The developer shall be responsible for the construction of off
site improvements at the westerly end of Paseo del Norte in
the Casa del Rey subdivision. The construction of these
improvements shall be guaranteed prior to approval of the
final map for Phase 2, Unit 2. A cash deposit was previously
deposited with the city to pay the cost of this work. The
amount deposited is available to the developer for
construction of these improvements.
10. Prior to final map approval for Phase 1, the developer shall
dedicate additional right-of-way along the frontage of the
property on East "H" street to provide a 20 foot parkway
(existing curbline to property line).
11. The developer shall be responsible for construction of a
sidewalk/recreational pathway along the entire frontage of
subject property on East "H" Street from Paseo Ranchero
westerly to Paseo del Rey to the satisfaction of the city
Engineer, Director of Planning and the Director of Parks and
5
3/-~9
Recreation. The construction of these improvements shall be
guaranteed prior to final map approval for Phase 1.
12. The developer shall be responsible for construction of an
expanded 8 to 10 foot wide sidewalk/recreational pathway along
the western side of paseo Ranchero, to connect the trail
systems in the south leg of Rice canyon and in the Telegraph
Canyon Road open space area. These improvements shall be
installed in conjunction with the construction phases of Pas eo
Ranchero specified in the Public Facilities Financing Plan.
13. The developer shall be responsible for the construction of
wider sidewalks at transit stops, subject to the approval of
the city Engineer.
14. The final design of Paseo Ranchero shall include eight foot
wide landscape easement buffers as requi:5'ed by the street
Design Standards or be adjoined by an open space lot at least
eight feet wide with slopes no greater than 5:1, except in the
following areas where the final design shall be subject to the
approval of the Planning Director, Landscape Architect and
city Engineer:
a. Adjacent to the lots fronting on Cabo Calabazo, Calle
Candelero and Punto Miraleste where a special slope and
retaining wall design will be implemented;
b. Along the Junior High School site;
c. Along the existing Ladera Villas and Mission Verde
subdivisions where existing conditions shall remain; and
d. Adjacent to the out-parcel owned by the Chula vista
School District.
15. The final design of East "J" Street shall include 5.5 foot
wide landscape easement buffers as required by the Street
Design Standards or be adjoined by an open space lot at least
5.5 feet wide with 5: 1 maximum side slopes, except in the
following locations where the final design shall be subject to
the approval of the Planning Director, Landscape Architect and
City Engineer:
a. Along the park site;
b. Along the two corner lots at the intersection of East "J"
Street and Camino Miel (lots 82 and 97 of Phase 2, Unit
1) and the southeast corner lot of East "J" Street and
Cabo Capote (lot 85 of Phase 2, Unit 2);
c. Adjacent to the out-parcel owned by the Chula vista
School District; and
6
"31 -III
d. Along the existing Bel Aire Ridge subdivision where
existing conditions shall remain.
16. All retaining walls which interface with the public street
system shall be constructed to match the Ranch Rancho del Rey
SPA III Design Guideline standards for exterior walls.
17. The developer shall be responsible for construction of full
street improvements for all public and private streets shown
on the Tentative Map within the subdivision boundary; and for
the construction of off-site improvements to construct Paseo
Ranchero, East "J" Street and Paseo Ladera as shown on the
Tentative Map, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Said improvements shall include, but not be limited to,
asphalt concrete pavement, base, concrete curb, gutter and
sidewalk, sewer and water utilities, drainage facilities,
street lights, signs, fire hydrants and transitions to
existing improvements. Street intersection spacing as shown
on the tentative map is hereby approved.
18. All the streets shown on the Tentative Map within the
subdivision boundary, except private streets, shall be
dedicated for public use. Design of said streets shall meet
all City standards.
19. A temporary turnaround conforming to city standards shall be
provided at the end of streets having a length greater than
150 feet, measured from the center line of the nearest
intersecting street to the center of the cul-de-sac, except as
approved by the city Engineer.
20. Cul-de-sacs and knuckles shall be designed and built in
accordance with City standards unless otherwise approved by
the City Engineer.
Lot Confiquration
21. Frontage on all lots shall be a minimum of 35 feet at the
right-Of-way line except as approved by the City Engineer.
This condition does not apply to flag lots, as defined in the
Municipal Code.
22. Lot lines shall be located at the top of slopes except as
approved by the city Engineer. When adjacent to open space
lots, property lines shall be located a minimum 2.5 feet from
the top of slope.
23. The preparation of final maps and plans for the locations
listed below shall be carried out in accordance with the
7
31 - 3/;
~.
following criteria unless otherwise approved by the City
Engineer and Director of Planning:
a. Provide a minimum 50 feet from the corner of Pas eo
Ranchero and East "J" street to lots 6 and 7, Phase 3,
unit 2, to provide additional buffer and transition area
at the corner.
b. Provide a pedestrian throughway between lots 130 and 131,
Phase 3, unit 2, from Camino Calabazo to east "J" street
across from the school and park sites.
c. Lot 128 of Phase 2, unit I, shall be widened to a minimum
50 foot width to accommodate a combined slope and maximum
5 foot retaining wall. This is to avoid a "tunnel"
effect created at side lot lines.
d.
Lots 3 and 5, Phase 2, unit 3 shall
foot high retaining walls, and/or
retaining walls and crib walls.
utilize maximum 5
a combination of
e. Provide a different name for each of the portions of
Palazzo Court located to the east and west of East "J"
street and the portions of Dorado Way located to the east
and west of Camino Miel.
street Trees/Open Space
24. The developer shall grant to the City street tree planting and
maintenance easements along all public streets as shown on the
Tentative Map. The width of said easements shall be as
outlined in the city's street Design Standards POlicy.
25. The developer shall be responsible for street trees in
accordance with Section 18.28.10 of the Chula vista Municipal
Code. The use of cones shall be included where necessary to
reduce the impact of root systems disrupting adjacent
sidewalks and rights-of-way.
26. All open space lots adjacent to public rights-of-way shall
maintain a width so as to provide 10 feet of landscaping
treatment behind the back of sidewalk.
27. Maintenance of all facilities and improvements within open
space areas covered by home owners associations shall be
covered by CC&Rs to be submitted and approved by the Planning
Department prior to approval of the associated final map.
28. Prior to the approval of any final map, the developer shall
request in writing that maintenance of all facilities and
improvements within the open space area associated with such
8
3/ - ~J-
map shall be the responsibility of the Rancho del Rey Open
Space Maintenance District.
29. Prior to approval of the first final map, a comprehensive
landscape plan shall be submitted for review and approval of
the City Landscape Architect and Director of Parks and
Recreation. Prior to approval of each final map,
comprehensive, detailed landscape and irrigation plans,
erosion control plans and detailed water management guidelines
for all landscape irrigation shall be submitted in accordance
with the Chula vista Landscape Manual for the associated
landscaping in that final map. These detailed landscape and
irrigation plans shall be for the review and approval of the
City Landscape Architect and Director of Parks and Recreation.
The landscaping format within the project shall be to
emphasize native, drought tolerant plant material. Exceptions
can be made for areas where reclaimed water is exclusively
used. The comprehensive landscape plans shall address:
a. Slope enhancement and landscape treatment for the slope
in Open Space Lot A, Phase 3, unit 3, beneath the Junior
High School lot. The plan shall address and provide for
mature size plant material, boulder work-and/or buttress
work on the slope.
b.
A naturalized revegetation program for areas
in open space lots, which may include
irrigation.
of grading
temporary
c. The disturbed "native" areas within Telegraph Canyon Road
open space corridor. This area shall include tree
groupings or tree groves. These plantings shall be
treated as random plantings and shall be identified in at
least six areas along the corridor with each location
providing plantings of 50 to 100 trees. The exact number
of trees and locations are to be approved by the Planning
Department and Department of Parks and Recreation. The
intent of these grove areas is to provide a consistency
with existing grove areas in the open space corridor west
of the Rancho del Rey SPA III area.
30. Prior to approval of the first final map, details showing the
location and design of the trail system and a sign program
shall be submitted to and approved by the Directors of
Planning and Parks and Recreation. The trail system in the
open space lots shall be a minimum 6 feet wide within an 8
foot horizontal clear space and a 10 foot vertical clear
space. The associated sign program shall identify the trail
network in the open space areas and connecting along Paseo
Ranchero, to the satisfaction of the Directors of Planning and
Parks and Recreation.
9
3/-31
31. Prior final map approval for Phase 3, unit 3 and Phase 4, unit
2 as shown on the Tentative Map, cross sections shall be
submitted to and approved by the Director of Planning and City
Engineer illustrating the interface where the trail is located
adjacent to the drainage ditch along Telegraph Canyon Road.
The fencing of the drainage channel shall be aesthetically
pleasing incorporating the use of plantings, equestrian type
fencing and vinyl clad fencing. These cross sections and
decorative fencing program may be included with the
comprehensive landscape plan. Fence gates shall be provided
at locations approved by the City Engineer to allow
maintenance of the drainage channel.
Parks
32. The developer shall be obligated for 12.5 acres of parkland as
described in the approved SPA Plan, including land, and/or
fees, and/or additional improvements, in accordance with the
Parkland Dedication Ordinance. The actual final acreage will
relate to the number of units approved with the final maps.
33. The park located in Phase 3, unit 4 shall be a minimum 10 net
useable acres. Design and development of the park shall be
subject to the approval of the city's Director of Parks and
Recreation and shall conform with the park master plan to be
adopted by the city Council.
34. An adequate buffer and separation of 50 feet shall be provided
between the residential lots at the eastern end of Palazzo
Court and the existing park facilities, to the satisfaction of
the Director of Parks and Recreation. Solution may include
but is not limited to relocating an existing tennis court or
lot redesign.
35. A minimum 20 foot wide access corridor shall be maintained at
the end of Paseo Palazzo where the cul-de-sac abuts the
existing park. Said area shall be made part of the park.
Detail and design of the access shall be submitted to and
approved by the Departments of Planning and Parks and
Recreation prior to final map approval for Phase 3, unit 1.
Gradinq/Drainaqe
36. An erosion and sedimentation control plan shall be prepared as
part of the grading plans.
37. Specific methods of handling storm drainage are subject to
detailed approval by the city Engineer at the time of
submission of improvement and grading plans. Design shall be
accomplished on the basis of the requirements of the
Subdivision Manual and the Grading Ordinance (No. 1797 as
amended). The developer shall submit calculations to
10
~) - "5/f
demonstrate compliance with all drainage requirements of the
Subdivision Manual.
38. Grading proposals shall be reviewed and approved by the City
Engineer and Director of Planning for consideration of
balanced cut and fill, utilization of appropriate soil types,
effective landscaping and revegetation where applicable.
Grading shall occur in separate phases unless a single phase
operation is approved with the grading plan.
39. A letter of permission for grading shall be obtained from
SDG&E prior to any grading within or adjacent to an SDG&E
easement or which would affect access thereto.
40. The developer shall make a reasonable effort to obtain
permission to grade the slopes along Buena vista Way at the
former intersection of East IlJIl Street. If permission to
grade said slope is not reasonably attainable as determined by
the city Engineer, the regrading of these slopes shall not be
required. The provisions of this condition shall be complied
with prior to approval of the final map for Phase 3, unit 3.
41. Prior to approval of any final map for single family
residential use, the developer shall submit a list of proposed
lots indicating whether the structure will be located on fill,
cut or a transition between two situations.
42. Lots shall be so graded as to drain to the street or an
approved drainage system. Drainage shall not be permitted to
flow over slopes. Lots 71, 72 and 89 of Phase 2 Unit 1 shall
be designed so that there will be no negative grading or
drainage impacts to the adjacent off-site properties.
43. Graded access shall be provided to all public storm drain
structures including inlet and outlet structures. Paved
access shall be provided to drainage structures located in the
rear yard of any residential lot or as approved by the city
Engineer.
44. The use of boulders in minor drainage basins and energy
dissipators in the canyon and open space areas in the manner
approved by the City Engineer and Planning Director, is
encouraged to allow water to be captured and to allow trees to
grow naturally.
Sewer
45. The developer shall be responsible for performing sewage flow
metering to monitor three segments of main identified in the
Rick Engineering report dated September 5, 1990 as sections
QR, X1X2 and KL. Metering shall be accomplished at the
locations determined by the city Engineer. Metering shall be
11
3/-3$
accomplished prior to the issuance of any building permit for
SPA III and be repeated at intervals directed by the city
Engineer. Should any of these segments have metered flows
which fill more than 80% of the pipe diameter, the applicant
shall construct parallel facilities as determined by the city
Engineer. The developer shall enter into an agreement with
the City prior to first final map approval providing for all
items indicated above.
46. An improved access road with a minimum width of 12 feet shall
be provided to all sanitary sewer manholes. The roadway shall
be designed for an H-20 wheel load or other loading as
approved by the City Engineer.
47. The developer shall obtain permission from the city to deposit
sewage in a foreign basin. The developer shall enter into an
agreement with the City relative to the diversion of sewage
prior to final map approval for any phase or unit thereof
proposing said diversion.
48. The developer shall be responsible for the removal of the
existing sewer pump stations (Mission Verde and Candlewood).
Prior to approval of any final map entailing said removal, the
owner and the city shall enter into an agreement to establish
the scope of work and the amount to be reimbursed by the City
to the subdivider for performing said work. The developer may
also request the formation of a special sewer service area to
provide for the cost of connection of the area currently being
served by the Candlewood pump station to the permanent gravity
sewer system.
Unless otherwise approved by the city Engineer, the scope of
work at both sites shall be limited to the removal and
disposal of equipment, grading, landscaping and construction
of new sewerlines and manholes required for connection to the
proposed Rancho del Rey sewer system. Any upsizing of Rancho
del Rey Sewer lines due solely to the flow generated by the
Mission Verde and Candlewood areas shall also be included.
Reclaimed Water
49. Prior to approval of the associated final map, the developer
shall provide on-site infrastructure to accept and to use
reclaimed water when it is available, along Paseo Ranchero
from Telegraph Canyon Road to East "H" Street and along East
"J" Street from Paseo Ranchero to the park site, per the
adopted Public Facilities Financing Plan.
50. Any costs incurred from retrofitting the reclaimed water
system, when reclaimed water becomes available, shall be paid
by the developer. Monies for this shall be held by the City,
through a deposit set up by the developer. The amount shall
12
3/-36
be determined by the developer, approved by the City and in
place prior to approval of each associated final map.
Fire
51.
Fire hydrants will be required per
standards. Hydrant spacing is 500 feet
300 feet for mUlti-family dwellings.
the Fire Department
for single family and
52. Maximum hydrant pressure shall not exceed 150 psi.
53. Fire hydrants and roadway access (per City Fire Marshall
approval) shall be installed, tested and operational prior to
any combustible materials placed on-site.
Aqreements/Covenants
54. Prior to final map approval for Phase 1, unit 1, the developer
shall enter into an agreement with the City to guarantee the
development of the parcel specifically for senior housing.
55. Prior to the approval of the first final map, the developer
shall enter into an agreement to provide a right turn lane at
the intersection of Pas eo del Rey and East "H" street, to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer, if the threshold standards
for this intersection as expressed in the then current Growth
Management Ordinance are exceeded at any time during the
development of this project.
56. Prior to approval of the first final map, the developer shall
enter into an agreement to provide a park-n-ride facility near
the intersection of East "H" street and Paseo Ranchero to
include 50 parking spaces, 10 bicycle lockers, lighting, trash
receptacles and circulation striping to the satisfaction of
the City Transit Coordinator. In addition, a transit stop, to
include a bench, shelter and trash receptacle, shall be
provided on the north side of East "H" street. A plan of said
improvements and the timing thereof shall be submitted and
approved by the City Transit Coordinator.
57. Prior to approval of each final map, copies of proposed CC&Rs
for the subdivision shall be submitted to and approved by the
city Planning Department.
58. Prior to approval of the first final map, the developer shall
provide a schedule, subject to the approval of the Planning
Director and city Housing Coordinator, for the development of
low income housing as defined in the agreement executed
between the city and Rancho del Rey Partnership per city
Council Resolution No. 15751 dated August 7, 1990.
13
~/-~17
59. Prior to the approval of any final map for the subject
subdivision or any unit thereof, the developer shall obtain
all off-site right-of-way necessary for the installation of
required improvements for that unit. The developer shall also
provide easements for all on-site and off-site public storm
drains, sewers and other public utilities prior to approval of
the final map. Easements shall be a minimum width of 6 feet
greater than pipe size, but in no case less than 10 feet.
60. The developer shall notify the city at least 60 days prior to
consideration of the final map by city if off-site right-of-
way cannot be obtained as required by the Conditions of
approval. (Only off-site right-of-way or easements affected
by Section 66462.5 of the Subdivision Map Act are covered by
this condition.
After said notification, the developer shall:
a. Pay the full cost of acquiring off-site right-of-way or
easements required by the Conditions of Approval of the
tentative Map.
b. Deposit with the city the estimated cost of acquiring
said right-of-way or easements. Said estimate to be
approved by the City Engineer.
c. Have all easements and/or right-of-way documents and
plats prepared and appraisals complete which are
necessary to commence condemnation proceedings.
d. If the developer so requests, the city may use its powers
to acquire right-of-way, easements or licenses needed for
off-site improvements or work related to the Tentative
Map. The developers shall pay all costs, both direct and
indirect incurred in said acquisition.
The requirements of a, b, and c above shall be accomplished
prior to the approval of the Final Map.
All off-site requirements which fall under the purview of
section 66462.5 of the State Subdivision Map Act will be
waived in accordance with that section of the Act if the City
does not comply with the 120 day limitation specified in that
section.
61. Prior to approval of each final map, the developer shall enter
into an agreement with the city to include the subdivisions in
the Mello Roos public facilities district or an acceptable
alternative financing program, subject to the approval of both
the Chula vista Elementary and Sweetwater High School
Districts.
14
3/-~
62. Prior to approval of each final map, the developer shall enter
into an agreement with the City wherein he agrees to comply
with that version of the Growth Management Ordinance in effect
at the time a building permit is issued. Such compliance
includes but is not limited to the then current East Chula
vista Transportation Phasing Plan and the adopted Air Quality
Improvement Plan and Water Conservation Plan for Rancho del
Rey SPA III.
63. Prior to final map approval for any phase or unit thereof, the
developer shall enter into an agreement with the City whereby:
a. The developer agrees that the City may withhold building
permits for any units in the subject subdivision if any
one of the following occurs:
1. Regional development threshold limits set by the
then current adopted East Chula vista
Transportation Phasing Plan have been reached.
2. Traffic volumes, level of service, public utilities
and/or services exceed the threshold standards in
the then effective Growth Management Ordinance.
b. The developer agrees that the city may withhold occupancy
permits for any of the phases of development identified
in the Public Facilities Financing Plan (PFFP) for Rancho
del Rey SPA III if the required public facilities, as
identified in the PFFP or as amended by the Annual
Monitoring Program have not been completed.
64. Prior to approval of each final map, the developer shall agree
to not protest the formation of a district for the maintenance
of landscaped medians and parkways along streets within and
adjacent to the subject property.
65. Prior to approval of each final map, the developer shall enter
into an agreement with the City wherein he holds the City
harmless for any liability for erosion, siltation or increased
flow of drainage resulting from this project.
66. The developer shall enter into an agreement with the City
whereby the developer agrees to participate in the monitoring
of existing and future sewage flows in the Telegraph Canyon
Trunk Sewer and the financing of the preparation of the Basin
Plan and, pursuant to any adopted Basin Plan, agree to
participate in the financing of improvements set forth
therein, in an equitable manner. Said agreement shall be
executed by the developer prior to final map approval for any
phase or unit proposing to discharge sewage into the Telegraph
Canyon Trunk Sewer.
15
~)-3'
67. The developer shall permit all franchised cable television
companies ("Cable Company") equal opportunity to place conduit
to and provide cable television service for each lot within
the subdivision. The developer shall enter into an agreement
with all participating Cable Companies which shall provide, in
part, that upon receiving written notice from the city that
said Cable Company is in violation of the terms and conditions
of the franchise granted to said Cable company, or any other
terms and conditions regulating said Cable Company in the City
of Chula vista, as same may from time to time be amended,
developer shall suspend Cable Company's access to said conduit
until city otherwise notifies developer. Said agreement shall
be approved by the City Attorney prior to final map approval.
Fees/Pavments
68. The subject property is within the boundaries of Open Space
District #20 (Zone 7), Open space District #10 (Phase II) and
Assessment District #87-1. Prior to final map approval or
other grant of approval for any phase or unit thereof, the
developer shall pay all costs associated with:
a) detachment of subject property from Open Space District
#10 (Phase II); and
b) reapportionment of assessments for Open Space District
#20 (Zone 7) and Assessment District #87-1 as a result of
subdivision of lands within the project boundary.
69. The developer shall pay:
a. Spring Valley Sewer Trunk connection fees ($130jacre)
prior to final map approval for any phase or unit thereof
contributing flow to the spring Valley Trunk Sewer.
b. Telegraph Canyon drainage fees in accordance with
Ordinance 2384.
70. PAD fees shall be waived or modified as provided in the
adopted Public Facilities Financing Plan for Rancho del Rey.
RCT fees and DIF fees shall be paid in accordance with the
applicable regulations. PAD fees shall be guaranteed until
such time as the city waives said fees.
Miscellaneous
71.
The boundary of
California System
the subdivision shall
Zone VI (1983).
be
tied
to
the
72. Prior to final map approval for any unit, the developer shall
submit a copy of said final map in a digital format such as
16
3/-~1f1)
--'-
(DXF) graphic file. This Computer Aided Design (CAD) copy of
the final map shall be based on accurate coordinate geometry
calculations and shall be submitted on 5 1/2 HD floppy disk
prior to recordation of the final map.
73. The developer may file a master final map which provides for
the sale of super block lots corresponding to the units and
phasing or combination of units and phasing thereof, shown on
the tentative map.
If said super block lots do not show individual lots depicted
on the approved tentative map, a subsequent final map shall be
filed for any lot which will be further subdivided.
The city Engineer may condition approval of such a final map
to require necessary plans to provide infrastructure necessary
top meet city threshold policies and to conform to the
approved Public Facilities Financing Plan. All super block
lots created shall have access to a dedicated pUblic street.
Bonds in the amounts determined by the City Engineer shall be
posted prior to approval of a master final map. Said master
final map shall not be considered the first final map as
indicated in other conditions of approval unless said map
contains single or multiple family lots shown on the tentative
map.
Code Requirements
74. The developer shall comply with all relevant Federal, State
and Local regulations, including the Clean Water Act. The
developer shall be responsible for providing all required
testing and documentation to demonstrate said compliance as
required by the City Engineer.
75. The developer shall comply with all applicable sections of the
Chula vista Municipal Code as they exist at the time of
issuance of the building permit. Preparation of the final map
and all plans shall be in accordance with the provisions of
the Subdivision Map Act and the City of Chula vista
Subdivision Map Act and the city of Chula vista Subdivision
Ordinances and Subdivision Manual.
76. Applicant shall comply with, remain in compliance with, and
implement, the terms, conditions and prOV1S10nS of the
Sectional Planning Area Plan, and such Water Conservation
Plan, the Air Quality Plan and the Public Facilities Financing
Plan approved by the Council ("Plans") as are applicable to
the property which is the subject matter of this Tentative
Map, prior to approval of the Final Map, or shall have entered
into an agreement with the city, providing the city with such
security and or assurance (including recordation of covenants
17
-g 1- JftJ'I1
(including recordation of covenants running with the land) and
implementation procedures as the city may require, assuring that,
after approval of the Final Map, the Applicant shall continue to
comply with, remain in compliance with, and implement such
Plans.
That a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the owners of the
property.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA,
CALIFORNIA, this 18th day of June, 1991, by the following vote, to-
wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTENTIONS:
Presented by
Approved as to form by
Robert A. Leiter
Director of Planning
Bruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
(RDR3TMCC.RES)
18
3/- ttt.
RESOLUTION NO.~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE CEQA FINDINGS FOR
EIR-89-10, RANCHO DEL REY SPA III
The City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, subsequent to the city Council's adoption of
the CEQA Findings for EIR-89-10 on Rancho del Rey SPA III, and in
accordance with Council's conditional approval of the RDR SPA III
Plan, new studies were required to evaluate ways to reduce net
water waste and improve air quality within the project; and
WHEREAS, the Water and Air Plans specify measures to be
incorporated into the project that provide for better water and
air quality.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula Vista does hereby amend the CEQA Findings for
EIR-89-10, Rancho del Rey SPA III, to include the Water and Air
Plans.
Presented by
~to
ity Attorney
Robert A. Leiter, Director of
Planning
8969a
~ J- lfj
RESOLUTION NO.~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE MITIGATION MONITORING
PROGRAM FOR EIR-89-10, RANCHO DEL REY SPA III
The City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, a Mitigation Monitoring Program for EIR-89-10,
Rancho del Rey SPA III, was adopted by the City Planning
Commission on November 14, 1990 and by the City Council on
January 15, 1991; and
WHEREAS, amendments have been made to the Monitoring
Program since water use has been reduced and additional measures
have been added to further mitigate negative impacts to water
quality; and
WHEREAS,
implemen ted, the
accordingly.
in order to assure that these are
Mi tiga tion Moni tor ing Program has been
in fact
amended
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula Vista does hereby amend the Mitigation
Monitoring Program for EIR-89-10, Rancho del Rey SPA III.
Robert A. Leiter, Director of
Planning
8970a
J
o fO':O
Presented by
, Clty Attorney
31-~~1'
S." .',.:.l...
..;'''':'1'h"
'~f'=-/ :",.,E~
:.J;:-:~$ 7.';.Lj
DATED
CASE !,~
I," 'In
v: -~ - i.
.
~- ..-, , .'"
- '::':': :::c'=:'~ TI]
P.02
6915171
G/I,h
'~,
(,
~ ..,_:.~ - N C
_~::E CITY OF
C~'H
\/Y:.:;TA
, ,
.......
'_"A,Llf':"'it-fN rft.
;;',."'.3,, TIiAT A PUB'.l'; HEA.;.!;'"G wILl. BE HELD BY THE
,": - ct,'f'''' ,~f :r:J..~~ ,i.st;'1; california, fot' the
! ;
~ J/? L'0t
'/"",':J.'ta
,.-,....." ,0,.1' --, ....,:,~,'f.,.,~"'~., ~,..t.""';'''~~l'on ma',
;. ~~.,~,; .....'- ,;"" {., ,,~-.:; '- '.J. '"C ~'~ ... ,""-:1..,\.....1. ~ ..l.-.::t. ,.t-'
:r.. d::..-;t t,'\.l.-;,;t::" a ,'-'J.'::' <:"','H-rr~"'ti.L~nl.ty dE):s~gn
:!:,'i!r~r::',t:,,:, d~,-,~ ?~. ~)~; r T,I pro,; e.ct,
.,'). ,';tw'>?!':?7: i:<,i;;~::' ... ~3t,.t"e{:~t ::tnd
r
.,.}- ;~;
.~
r. -2: ~
.2:,,');'1' '.
;-,'.':'t;::
;;'~ f', :::'; (~.:.;: l';; ;
'-,":>',...,. ':-:... 403 acres
~'j ,.,\. inq area for
~-.e ighbcrhOQd
~;<, f<.:.c';~lity
,;;..' i. ~. ~::. ,.~ rt',' p,:-:! rt
~ f,,~~Ji0B ietails
~,':. _:~~ tentati.ve:
,_ ~ "0 :.
~y l::-:,:j;
...: >::-~.-t:l'~I.)'m~
j,(-r-" e l,;,:,pillcn t
~!;, / -2,;..<
::;hQ.:"l, ,':i <::~,~~':,:~1!',.,
-..':'. ;
""':5.
""";:;, ....
~. - .
.. ",
J.- i~+.'_~ ,;; ~.t;...' ': ~ ': r.~!; 11. r
.,,;,:'c~e .'l::'() f thf" -:,<,:;",-,:2;~'
,:1..
::GD":'-:; ;, :1~~~; 'C"
-
i. ,:.::::i0n r:.G~~
.,
':1.,,,
~ .,io"
''< .~ i ,_ '
:.: \~. r<' :.A.;\~t-; L'1:". ~-j i;i !:' <:,4 , ";
C t f i. ::>.,;;... t ne
'~,,~ ~'-'i.;:r-:-:,h A,' ':':
;',.,-
'-,' ~l...:,b;,j t.c~d
',:::; t LIf; ::-aCi2 . ",,-... ....~'
100 r,~ the he~~lnq !.t~.;
:.'f
t': ,~~
". '. ... ~ ,
'..,.-- ',1
:,:",,-;:...
i.:,'~n';G th~~ <:'~'. ty L'~'~;
{:::';'~'': '. ';':'71 Clj) thl.~;;
,
. .
.~ ~ C::):.J-;:'t, ;~:::,t ... ...tsd t~-, ~',;-, ~s.tt-;
or .scm~,'~or:'~ ellC,(' ,:~',is~~ ~.~ ~":~ ;,?pu.b.li{~' [)Harl.\l'..j
~.ce!, 01' in ';"'t:"_-:. tT:,'??'; {::C::;I:' r ,s.;~:,;::,.).:.l-~ '-ICt~ d~liveredtc:
L prior" to ttle pc.b2. j,.;__: h~;:L~,i.'n
'-i_ v~~"NC WILL BE HELD BY r}Ui
~,:1':~l, at~ 6:00 p~m. in th",>
E-ul1,::1..nl.': 276 Fourth Ave:nls,
~~ bc GG3rd rnDY appear~
(:j' '7'1 COfJNCI L '~Tuesday !
':::. ,~,(E.:i 1 C1~a.r!lCi~~:t:s t Pub 1 i (;
d.C 'Aj"r>i(.'h time any pe~so~;.
",-. >-'i.~ ~." ". p"
~~',~)' ~ .;.S<";ji-
C:\ ..\ "(,'
p~,::S ~~i .'J- D 2
3/-'1'"
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
, _ (';_~ xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
", xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
c.' _
C5J.': ,J xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
, _1 xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
0'; k xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
C. # ') xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
""~ -~ xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
~ ~ xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
o.
""'-"- 6400501900
CENTERRE BANK OF KANSAS CITY T
R
C/O LA PETITE ACADEMY
P 0 80X 26610
KANSAS CITY MO 64196
6400502700
OTAY MUNICIPAL .ATER DISTRICT
UNKNO~N ADDRESS
'"-:
6401910200
BERMUDEZ CARLOS M/~ARIA G ~ C
C/O INTERNATIONAL REAL ESTATE
579 TELEGRAPH CYN RD
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
6401910600
REINHOLTZ JAMES F/BONNIE J
I I _ , ~..l!!!"" ".. I -.
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX ~
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX .,
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx l
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx .1
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
640C502000
CITY OF CHULA
C/O CITY R
270 F AVE
C VISTA CA 91910
..
I
6400301500
PARDEE CONSTRUCTION CO
108BO .ILSHIRE eLVD #1400
LOS ANGELES CA 90024
.
.
0401910300
EMPIZO MAXI~INO V/SHIRLEY M
I .._~V' _ _ . ..
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
.
.
0401910700
D~RRANT iARALD K
L I _ _ . n
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
.
.
0401911100
ELENA VILLANI SEBASTIAN
i - , ,,__
CHULA VISTA CA 92012
(' () r ')( ~tSlmO~~BLO Z1SANDOVAL
C.'OA
, () C' III no__ ..-
" , CHULA VISTA CA 92010
o.ro
, Of: II
c. ~ (16401911400
C. 0 C: .. EY~UYA ROY j'~A L
0.,,'-1 CHULI VISTA CA 92010
'OE:.._
6401911800
ANCIRA OSiAR M
t 11. _ .....~""
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
31 - "IS
.
.
6401911500
SHAHTOUT EMILE/HALA
~_. .-- --' ~.....
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
.
.
6401911900
TALAVERA CHRISTOPHER C/GAIL Y
..
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
.
.
(' ~ r.. -:r
c., _1 .
~n J
c., ....J
on k.
c.."
~(~ ~
o. (,.
~
.
LABL 00101 PCS-90-02
RES: SFO;"RANCHO DEL REY SPA]
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
.
6400500800
eENNETT S~SA~ M
, _ _".' v
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
. t~
CITY LA VISTA
C/O CITY M
. 276 FOURTH AVE
CHULA VISTA CA 91910
.
",;:
.
. 6401910400
<ELLEY THOMAS C/CAROLE A
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
.
.
(' ~ r ,-.,c
c.'- 0 .
c o t: .
i~.~ (}
r 0.: . .
,.
o-.~ n
- ~ .: )I
-
a. JL.l .
..
.
~.
6401910800
HENOR~~ ROBERT
. . ~. ...-
CHULA VISTA CA
ClOIANA 0
920~
6401911200
~X/AIOA G S
~
6401911600
FUTRELL DONALD </CONNIE L
.l.
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
31-L/fo
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
6400501800
EVANGELICAL FREE CHURCH OF C'
LA VISTA
795 EAST J ST
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
640050260C
RANCHO DEL REY PARTNERSHIF
C/O MC MILLIN DEVELOPMENT
2727 HOOVER AVE
NATIONAL CITY CA 92050
6401910100
YU LOYDA M
-
bONITA CA 92002
6401910500
DE TOCA A_AOOR/TERESA G
C/O INTERNATleNAL REALTY SER\
579 TELEGRAPH CANYON RO
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
6401910900
PASCUA JOSE FINO C FAMILY TRU~
. -
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
6401911300
MITTER DEB <
---
CHULA VISTA CA 92012
6401911700
fRAT CnRTER
CHULA VISTA
H/MARY R
CA 92010
,i
XXXXXXX xx x XXXXXXXX XXXX xx xx xx Xl X XX X XX XX XX X XX xx XX XX XX XX XX X XXx) 'XXX XX XX XX XXX XX X XX XX XX X X X X X XXx) XX XX XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X XX XX XX XX "".
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX! XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXI XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX) XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXI
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX' XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX) XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX) XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXI
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXI XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX) XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX) XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXI ..
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXI XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXI XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX) XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXI
.,
.,
6243200200 6243200300
p tOH~SON ROBERT E/JOYCE .~SHER WA~TER ~/NAO~I E
.. - -.
CHULA VISTA CA 92011 CHULA VISTA CA 92011
6243300200 6243300300
DELGADO HANUEL JR/ROHANA R VALDEZ GERARDO/OFELIA L
I. .
CHULA VISTA CA 92011 CHULA VISTA CA 92011
a.,
- 6243300100
, CHRISTIAN VIRGINIA II
~ CHULA VISTA CA 92011
,..
-,
6243300600
HARNS RAYIIOND E/~ARY H
CHULA VISTA CA 92011
6243300700
ADAIIS SUE G TRUST OF 1990
CHULA VISTA CA 92011
6243300500
~ORIARITY ROBERT J/GALEL
. -. - ..-
CHULA VISTA CA 92011
"
,
6243300900
~SHA
LE~ON GROVE CA 92045
6243301000
~AN
~92011
6243301100
COLLINS CHARLES F/IIARIA E
I t,,,
CHULA VISTA CA 92011
TRS
'l
'.
6243301300
HUNNICUTT ETTA C EST OF
C/O ~ARTHA TAUN
..n _
AUBURN CA 95603
6243301400
ELSEY JOHN N
. -, T ._ ... _.
CHULA VISTA CA 92011
6243301500
COATES THO~AS WI SANDRA S
CHULA VISTA CA 92011
'l
1
6243301700
JONES RONALD ~DORIS
1 J If
CHULA VISTA CA 92011
6243301BOO
HARQUEZ JOSE H/EVA A
IJll .
CHULA VISTA CA 92011
6243301900
HAZLEY SHARRON R
. --- . -'
CHULA VISTA CA 92011
")
lit
6243302100
LARSON LEONARD D/WIL~A L
rr .-W~ --
CHULA VI A CA 92011
6243302200
LANE STANLEY W/CYNTHIA RIDVAI
.
CHULA VISTA CA 92011
6243302300
CABRAL FERNANDO JR/HARY L
.-
CHULA VISTA CA 92011
"
6243200400
~L~ HARVI~l~/GENEVIEVE C
CHULA VISTA CA 92011
6243300400
ROSS JAHES III WILLA 0
CHULA VISTA CA 92011
6243300800
~HACKER HOWARD A LIANNE C
CHULA VISTA l~92011
6243301200
~ASE TOKUKO
CHULA VISTA
S
CA 92011
6243301600
WILSON IIAUREEN F
~92011
6243302000
DUNHAII BARBARA J
CHULA VISTA CA 92011
6243302400
~F
CHULA VISTA CA 92011
,..
....
",.
r~~
..
p
,.
~"'-.
I 6401912000
PEGE THOMAS J/CAROl J
. ~10
. 6401920200 6401920300
KONTOS ~ONA7D A BUNCE THOMAS ~/PENNY V
CHUlA VISTA CA 92010 ~
.
,~.~,-;-- . 6401920600 6401920700
C.. ( XAVIER JOY~UCY ~n~A~~EOERICK Y/FU~I N
() (; . CAllSBAO CA 92008 CHUlA VISTA CA 920lo
C., C. .
00 }.l
C. ~ (
~(~ ~ . 6401921000 6401921100
o. ~SIEH JIANN-S~ FELIX JOSEPH P
~O
~ . CHUlA VISTA CA-92010
I 6401921400 6401921500
BRANSFORD R/DINAH S ~fRTINEI JOSEPH P/ESTELA S
HULA VISTA CA 92010 CHUlA VISTA CA 92010
I
I 6401921 SOO 6401921900
PINPIN EOElBERTO T/lUANA M ~~~ FOT,W.WA
~ULA VISTA CA 92010 CHUlA VISTA CA 92010
- ,
C 6401922200 6401922300
BAUTISTA-aQlANDO/MARY A ~KATHlEEN E
. ~A VISTA CA Y<Ul0 CHUlA VISTA CA 9 010
. 6401922600 6401922700
2RKINSJYRON H/BARBARA J CHAMBERLAIN KATHRYN l
C' ~ r I""\lf . CHUlA VISTA CA 92010 ~010
C.- 0
COt! .
(J. r () . 6401923000 6401923100
C O.~ III LEO RICHARD ~O
G-.~ (1 ~ VISTA CA 92010
C O,~ . .
Q. .JL,.;'
-...r:: . 6401923400 6401930100
~TRICIA R ~
. CHUlA VISTA CA ~2010 CHUlA VISTA C 10
. 6401930400 6401930500
~ DU ~ETI..RICHARO G
CHULA VISTA CA 920 0 CHUlA VISTA CA 92~10
.
, 6401930800 6401930900
~UlA ROOOlFO lEONAROO A/CORAION l
UlA VISTA CA 92010 ~
. ~,~,-~-'_.~"-
.31-4/~
6401920400
TARANTINO FRANK A/LOREN R
iHULA VISTA CA 920fo
6401920800
, _ RIVER~IMANUEI/~A
~f';.~ CHULA VISTA CA 92010
C. ,:t'
ooe..
o.{~
0(;<\ 6401921200
c.:: CAVANAWii 1 PATRICk/MOLLY A
o e ( CHULA VISTA CA 92010
a. ..
>4-
6401921600
8ERESkY MiCHAEL T/CHRISTINE
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
6401922000
SARINAS RENATO C/ALITA T
CMULA VISTA CA 92010
6401922400
LEE GREGORY
CHULA VISTA
A/DAWN M
CA 92010
-.
640H22800
LAWSON LESLEY
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
" 0 one
:)e<ll' 6401923200
: 0 c;';t II VARGAS JOSE DE J/MELlNDA A
J.C 11. CMULA VISTA CA 92011)
. oc-:u:a
,:ec ):{'
, 0 COJ;( 11
. e;" 6401930200
u ~ GUERRA GUADALUPE R
---
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
6401930600
GOMEZ JOE A/FELISI~A P
I
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
6401931000
RUIZ ADRIAN
CHULA VISTA
M/CAROL A
-~
CA 92
3/- ~9
6401920100
RUSSO VINCENT M/GAILANNE
C~ULA VISTA CA 920"0
.
.
6401920500
~
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
.
.
6401920900
eERDICHE~r Jrfioeo
II _I. __
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
.
.
6401921300
BARRAGAN RICHARD/MARGARITA
-
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
e
.
6401921700
REED WAYNE P/YVONNE E
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
.
.
6401922100
COLeERT LARRY/CHRISTINA k
17 -'~~ .
CHULA V S A CA 92010
.
.
64U1922500
SCPUGGi ROBERT
--
CHULA VISTA. C A
.
A/DEeORAH S
92010
.
6401922900
OCHOA LUIS A/MARGARITA ~
~ A, ~
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
.
.
6401923300
CROSTHWAITE DAVID/NATALIE
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
.
.
6401930300
WOLF PAUL D/SUSAN
~HULA VPr+A CA 92010
.
.
6401930700
~
~
.
.
6401931100
SANSERINO RICHARD A/STELLA
RS
CHULA ViSTA-CA 9201d
M T ·
.
~~-'l
lit 6401931200 6401931300
LUDI DARWIN B/PATRICIA A ~AMLYN Y
--I .. ~
CHULA VISTA CA 92 CHULA VISTA CA 92010
C.
() 6401931600 640193170C
WUNSCH JOHN J/FE P ~IAA
- - CA 920-/0
CHULA VISTA CHULA VISTA CA 92010
0
. ~ r;r.( . 6401932000 6401932100
ce.. . ~URA L JANKIE~if JQ~EPH J{HOLLY V
aocI . CHULA VISTA CA 9201 CHULA VISTA CA 92010
Oe(l:t.
o () ( J)
G e ~a. . 6401932400 6401932500
al:ClI ~W'. mWEL S/VIRGINIA K SCOTT CHAOLES T/V!CKI L
oe )t: CA 9-%-10
. CHULA VISTA CHULA VISTA CA 92 10
...&....-
. 6401932800 6401932.900
CALVO MARTIN V/MARTHA ITO SHIGEMASA/KIY~E
. CHULA VISTA CA 92010 CHULA VISTA CA 92010
. 6401933200 6401933300
KING RONALD L/LINDA D WHITLEDGE JIM 0
. CHULA VISTA CA 92010 ~010
. 6401940100 6401940200
~SUNNY G ~M
. CHULA VISTA CA 92010 CHULA VISTA CA 2010
. 6401940500 6401940600
BARRAGAN DANIEL/VICTORIA ~LE
.
CHULA VISTA CA 92010 UL S 0
(' 0 Of)(' .
':J e OtJ
c a 1;'3 !I: . 6401940900 6401941000
JeCIJ HILL ~ARRY G/OLIVIA E ~CAROL R
C 0 1 :::Col: I - -~
,Jec..t) CHULA VISTA CA 92 ro CHULA VISTA CA 92010
'. a I:L( il .
oeu'U
9 6401941300 6401941400
GARCIA ARTHUR/ELIZABETH A ~NET P
111 I I r --
CHULA VISTA CA 92010 CHULA VISTA CA 92 10
.)
,I 6401941700 6401941800
ROBINSON JAMES M/ESTER A RENTZ LEONARD/KAREN M
CHULA VISTA CA 92010 ~H~LA VISTA CA 92010
.1
6401942100 6401942200
HOUCK DEWARD J/REBECCA E STONE CARVIN/MARILYN V
'" - ~
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
3/- 50
1
6401931400
WITTREICH JOHN
., of
CHULA VISTA CA
l/CLARICE M
2010
6401931800
EMERSON JI~MI-l O/JO C
CHULA VISTA CA 920f!
6401932200
~ROL M
~ r:.l!"'JI CHULA VISTA CA 92010
c: . (lJC
<> ( 1.'tl!J
l:. ~:1,' 6401932600
o (d/f MARTINEZ VIN~JR/NORA E
C. f;J. MLA VISTA CA 92010
<> ( .,( If
o.l.~
..0.-
6401933000
t?NG MELVYtl I/Y~NOA ~
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
6401933400
ORUMHELLER JOHN O/LUCILLE M
~010
6401940300
HARTWELL A~NE
~
'.,
6401940700
BONELLI GARRY J/MARTHA J
~O
r-.r.~
'.C R 16401941100
~O.:,( If LATSKr THR~AS I
;.ClfJCHULA VISTA CA 92010
0''1111
:.c"1
,0':;1 B; 6401941500
U.lJU STROVERi P~UL J II/ANDREA S
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
6401941900
HUNTING DA~~H
CHULA VISTA CA
B
92010
6401942300
APPEL ALEJANDRO M/MARIA G
~LLA VI~.A lA ~~~te'
3/-5/
6401931500
rENNIS TARRY O/LYNN L
CHULA VISTA CA 920fo
(
<<
6401931900
RIDS ANDRES H/SANDRA G
~o
.
.
6401932300
~RIAI
~10
.
.
6401932700
BEAROSLEY Re~~R/JOYCE 0
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
.
.
6401933100
~L
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
.
.
64
RANCHO REY PARTNERSHIP
C/O Me MILL OEVELOPMENT
2727 HoeVER AV,
NATIONAL CITY CA
.
.
6401940400
~
~O
.
.
6401940800
~BORAH A
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
.
.
6401941200
~RMA M
~010
.
.
6401941600
DISO MAlLIl..Q.. M/ ELISA L
tHULA VISTA CA 92010
.
.
6401942000
~NNA S
~
.
.
6401942400
REJON J GONZALO
LL ~
CHULA VISTA CA 9201
.
.
_.'---~1
<< 6401942500 6401942600
lINEN CHARLES J IROBINSON-lINEr< YEt MICHAEL l/KYlE A
NAHY CA 9. ~
. CHULA VISTA
. 6401942900 6401943000
~AS ON ~&iId 92010 ~IA C
. CHULA VISTA CA CHULA VISTA CA 92010
c~t':.~ . 6401950300 6401950400
~ZENAIDA R ~A
ae ,,(1 CHULA VI TA CA 92010 HUL S CA 10
<>. ; s .
c. ~ (J
00 }'I
ce~l" . 6401950700 6401950'00
o (~ II: BYRNE ~A~ES D/KATHERINE L ADAMS VICTOR L/SUSAN E
oe (1 Mo ISTACA 92010 ~010
~ .
. 6401951100 6401951200
VAN BRUNT CHARLES J/DOROTHEA TIETZ ~RIEDRICH K/ELEANOR G
. ~010 ~10
. 6401951500 6401951600
~BORGHILD EVANS FRANCIS E/FAYE S
& CA 92010 ~
. 6401951900 6401952000
FERRER FE~ANO M/MARITA M ~
&uLA 0\5 A CA 9d N DIEGO CA 92101
.
. 6401960300 6401960400
GUARNES JOHN P TAKAHASHI MUT
. MeA VISTA CA no!!' CHULA
(' C) ~ ('")('
G .':11
c Ot!(lI . 6401960700 6401960800
o.~ 11 HERNANDEZ CESARIO L/ADELAIDA c~
01:01 ~ ULA VISTA CA 92010
C-." ,.1 .
COI:~jJ
(). "I,.)
..,. . 6401961100 6401961200
~YE ~E RICHARD F/ELISA B
CHUlA VISTA CA 92010 CHULA VISTA CA 92010
.
. 6401961500 6401961600
~PHIE A ~
CHULA VISTA CA 10 CHULA VISTA CA 92010
.
.
6401961900
~L/EMILY S
~O
6401962000
CHAVEZ RAMON/CARMEN
~A VISTA CA 9~~10
~
3/-52.
6401942700
GARDINIER JO ANN
~10
6401950100
~HA
~10
6401950500
~IAS
~10
. ,.,riA
C.,.
C 1:, '" 6401950900
(... (;J. ~R N HIRLEY M
:0';( )l
(.r~ HL 010
C'~( l
C.lX
4- 6401951300
~L
6401951700
~E
~
6401960100
~G
~
RENEE
6401960500
PAYNE RULON K/CATHERINE A
~
Of'.n 6401960900
I.I..~
. C~~.i CHULA VISTA CA 92010
I:>I"IJ
. ., A
Co I.... 1 6401961300
\,0., A. BURKS RICHARD SIJEANNETTE
L
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
6401961700
WHEATFALL ARTHUR C/LINOA K
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
6401962100
GERKEN GARY B
C RED CARPET
CHUL
3/- 52.
6401;>42800
HORWATH ROBERT PI BEVERLEY K
~O
.
.
6401950200
~FORO jE1NNETTE M
C A VISTA CA 9~0
.
.
6401950600
GEORGE JAMES J
~O
.
.
6401951000
Iil1ILO C~~~r:jl'JILL A
CHULA V 10
.
.
6401951400
~
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
.
.
64019S1800
~A
~
.
.
6401960200
~AM
~
.
.
6401960600
CROW BYRON W
~
.
.
6401961000
STAFFORD MARSHALL L/ECHO H
~
.
.
6401961400
BLAIR JAMES F/NEWTON-BLAIR
ERANZA E
C~UL~ V1STA CA 92010
ESP ·
.
6401961800
~ARA A
~O
.
.
6401962200
~
~O
.
.
""~~"'-"""'-"-"""~.,...:;:::;;,..""....",..."."",
~'W
:;",~7>.'.;.
..,
'~!l"
- '~"E-'
l~ ~ r;-. .
0., ',(
Oil 11
CO~~ ..~ - ·
c.:-
oe - .
a. -,-
-=-.
C'~r(")( .
o e- J.J
C Of!ClI
ce~t) .
C 01:01
Ce'1'1
:"0(;(..
Oe",L)
~
1
6401962300
~AG
~O
.
.
6401970400
~ANA
~010
.
6401970800
~/PATTY A
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
6401971200
~AS
~
.
6401971600
MICHEL JOSEPH B/KAREN M
~
.
.
6401972000
MURPHY JAMES SILE IE A
HUL CA 2010
.
.
6401972400
~R
~
.
.
6401972800
BANGS ROBERT R JR/ELIZABETH A
TRUST 07-05-90
~
6401973200
~
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
.
6401980100
~
~O
.
.
6401980500
~ELL B
~
.
~
6401980900
STRIBLING DAVID MIJEAN K
~CLA VISTA tA J~~
..
,
3/-53
6401970100
~
~
6401970500
~
6401970900
~LJ
~
6401971300
~
6401971700
~YD
6401972100
~AREN G
~O
6401972500
~R
6401972900
~
6401973300
~INO I/MOhINA J
~A 92010
64019B0200
~RYL
6401980600
~IWARD
~10
ERIN
6401981000
~ER
~10
GIHSUEH
6401970200
OTTf rATI' Y HII" \2-06-90
CHULA VISTA CA 919T0
6401970600
~JR/DeBORAH
~10
6401971000
.-c>>r.~~RA G
c.,-<.]~
00 ..
c. ~ L:
s> (; ~ 6401971400
C.:- <'!~S JOSE A/OLGA P
oe '8
o. OC
....-.;;.;....
6401971800
~ENCE R
~
6401972200
~
~10
",
6401972600
~
6401973000
~VICKI L
(' c>> ~. l)(
C.(J]
- 0 C' (]( 6401973400
". '. ~T 09-06-90
~.~ ll-
C ot:(JiCHULA VISTA CA 92010
C -. . lJ 1
~. at:(]1
c;. 'JLl 6401980300
.,.~
6401980700
~HARON L
~10
64019E1100
~
,31-5tf
6401970300
SABLAN JOSEPH P/KATHLEEN M
~O'O
.-
6401970700 {
s ~ D/ANGELINE C
~2010
~
"
6401971100
~A~
~
(
t
6401971500
~HG
~
<<
<<
6401971900
~
~92bl0
<<
<<
6401972300
JARRETT DAVID
A V A C A
<<
MA. ReEN L
2 10
<<
6401972700
~
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
<<
.
6401973100
~V
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
.
.
6
RANCHO REY PARTNERSHIP
C/O ~C"I N
2727 HOOVE R
NATIONAL CITY
.
.
6401980400
SELDEN WAYNE R/LYNN M
CHULA V~TA CA 9201~
.
.
6401980800
~EK
.
.
6401981200
~CQUELINE L
~10
.
.
.
. ~ r;-J6
c..c
. ~o 9 .
e.( C-
oo }4
e.~(.
~e :n
o. .c .
C' ~ t' C)<'
ee'll
c ~4:C" .
c.:'" ~j
04:C)1
ee' J' 1 .
CO(;(li
o e ~L:
.
~
i
6401981300
ANDERSON MICHAEL J/CHESTA T
~
I
c
6401981700
eOW~~N~,pf.;\ H ~~!iATHLEEN M
CHU A
.
6401982100
~OYCE
~O
6401982500
WHITE CARLfMADONNA F TRS
CHULA VIS~ CA 920~
. 6402110400
~L
CHULA VISTA CA 9 10
.
. 6402110800
~CECILIA
HULA VISTA CA 010
.
. /:402120200
~RITA E
HULA VI CA 10
.
. 6402120600
~GLADYS S
HULA VISTA CA 92010
.
6402121300
cARBIERI R08ERT L JRfMARY A
~ VISTA CA~2010
,
6402130300
GENERATION SKIPPING TAX EXEMPl
TRUST
CfO UNION BANK
POBOX109
SAN DIEGO CA 92112
.
.
.
6402210400
HALL W~AM AfISABFL K
~NlT A CA ~2on2
.
31-S~
6401981400
~UST 11-09-84
~2010
6401981800
~IANNE C
~O
6401982200
~VfROCIO C
~2010
6401982600
MC CLENDON GARY Of PATRICIA A
~LA VISTA CA 928~
6402110500
~D a/DEBRA A
~010
6 111400
CITY CHULA VISTA
ClO CIT NAGER
276 FOURTH
CHULA VISTA CA
6402120300
RADFORD MICHAEL JfSUSAN G
~010
6402120700
~10
6402121400
THACKER JAMES A/SNYDER ROSEM,
Y T -
~ULA VISTA CA 92010
6402130400
~DELAIDA M
.~ 92010
6402210100
~fCINDI J
~2010
6402210500
~NAD
~10
6401981500
~C
~O
6401981900
LOREN MARl ETA R TRUST
~
6401982300
~MMA R
..'~r..,r~O
0., ,;:.1
C) (; ~
c.{ c,
a (; a 6.. 700
,~.. .'CITY 0 ULA VISTA
~ ,...: C/O CITY ER
() (~ ~ 276 FOURTH AV.
a. C CHULA VISTA CA 9
~
6402110600
~ICHELE A
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
6402120400
~/PATRICIA A
~010
6402121100
~
~
C' 0 t ('")(
G . " 't 1 6402130100
C C)(leX ~R/JACQUELlNE
:J. ~ t) CHULA VISTA CA 92010
co(:ex
c. ~ .)
c 0(: or
O.f1~E C
~CA 92010
6402210200
~WT
~ 92010
6402210600
~
~010
3/-$1.
6401981600
~L
~
~
6401982000
~VNiAS.~D I/VICKI L
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
1
t
6401982400
~
.
92143
.
6
RAN Rev PARTNERSHIP
C 10 MC M
2727 HoaVER
NATIONAL CITY
.
.
6402110700 .
HORTON WILLIE J JRISYKES-HORTO
N V<NORlA
1 I. _
CHULA VISTA CA 92010 .
6402120100 .
~M/WANOA J
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
.
6402120500
~TA tit.PH ~ iRIGRACE L
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
.
.
6402121200
~ E/SYLVIA G
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
.
.
6402130200
L.~
CHULA VISTA CA
J/MARY J
92010
.
.
6402130600
iffSENJVICKI L
CHULA VISTA CA
.
92010
.
6402210300
JO YONG IL/MYONG JA
~92010
.
.
6402211100
MERZA ER~IE R/CAMILLE M
~CA 92010
.
.
6402211600
~ORA J
~10
6402212400
~OR
~CA
J R/MARY H
92010
6402310800
TROTTER ALFRED DIll/wANDA J
()r,rJll~2010
C..... ~
all:{ B
d.ltC
00) ;( 0402311200
C.C::J.~A
a(~;{'n~O
O.Oc
-""--
t402311600
KINSMAN RAYMOND TR
~HULA V,.[. y]iho
6402312300
CUNNINGHAM AGUSTIN/MARIA
~2010
6402312700
~C/MARINA L
~010
6402313100
~IS AMELIA
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
r, 0 r"Ot
:; e C J( J 6402313500
o <<:;l 11 LOPEZ CRUZ/VERA
)eC"]~O
0<<:[( .
.oec 'K 1
0<<:"'.
U el.JL,; 6402313900
~RION I
~O
6402320400
JjATES JAMES
CHULA VISTA
./CATHERINE A
CA 9<~0
6402321100
PETERSON BRIAN
CHULA VISTA CA
LlJEANNE M
~910
3/-5 r
6402211700
EGU.. DANljl A/CECILIA P
CHULA VISTA CA 92~
.
.
6402310500
~~ERLINOA F
~O
.
.
6402310900
HUM8ARGER JEFFREY A/STAUB9E-HU
M8ARG~H
PI!' _n
HULA VISTA CA 92010
C'
.
6402311300
CAMe EROS ALFONSO/ISABELA T
~92010
.
.
6402312000
~
~O
.
.
6402312400
~M
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
.
.
6402312800
~R
~10
.
.
6402313200
~MARY S
~10
.
.
6402313600
~
.
.
6402320100
~TINE A
~O
.
.
6402320500
~M
.
.
6402321200
~A
.
.
--'-',
I 6402211200 6402211500
BULL THOMAS S/JOY A ~/MEGAN
~CA 92010 CHULA VISTA CA 92010
I
. 6402211800 6402211900
~/SUSAN C TORRE WILLIAM V/SINCLAIR ItERE
C STA CA 92010 ~
. CHULA VISTA CA 92010
CI r; -_ . 6402~10600 6402310700
~A MARIE MANGARIN MARIA T
ee- l CHULA V~ CA 92010
aD D . CHULA VISTA CA 92010
c.{ L
00 XI
ce:" l . 6402311000 6402311100
a (~ 'It ~RDIE K ~W/SUEN
oe (
. A CA 0 CHULA VISTA CA 92010
~
. 6402311400 6402311500
~ESA M ~
. 92010 CHULA VISTA CA 92010
. 6402312100 6402312200
~CAROL I ~RNE L TRS
. CH 0 CHULA VISTA CA 92010
'"-:::
. 6402312500 6402312600
~RESA S RUSZAT MARK
. 10 CHULA VISTA CA 92110
. 6402312900 6402313000
~ A/TERRI A f~FTIN fhSE-i':ii M
A CA 92010 CHULA V A A 10
r CI r- f'")( .
ce'- tJ
c a <<: r. . 6402313300 6402313400
c.~." , ~ ~CHENG
( 0 <<:-:a: CA 0 _ LA IS A CA 92010
c-.' r: .
'_ 0 <<: -jt
oeJL.:
-~ . 6402313700 6402313800 ,
~:ARGIE f ~
C U 0
.
. 6402320200 6402320300
~ RAUSCH DAVID L/SANDRA f
9 10 ~2010
.
.. 6402320600 6402321000
~ J SULLIVAN CURT D/CYNTHIA M
~10
f
3/-5'
. 6402321300 6402321400
rOMINQ HIROYUKI/KUNIKO KIMBROUGH JOHN W SR
~ ~10
.
. 6402321700 6402321800
~ORA G CASTANHO JOSEPH/THEA C
A A 92010 mLA VISTA CA 920"10
.
-, CI f: .~ . 6402322100 6402322200
~ iNiARNACION JAIM~ D/MARLINDA
0.,-<.1 CA 92or!'
~(; B ULA VISTA CA 92 CHULA VISTA
0.' C .
au )'f
C.::'~ . 6402400400 6402400500
. a (~ MENG JACK H/WE~DY C y<RGAS MARIA E
a.I ~2010 CHULA VISlA CA~2010
~ .
. 6402400800 6402400900
~ ~TZ ALFRED J/TERRIE M
STA C CHULA VISTA c! ~2010
.
. 6402401200 6402401300
~ADALUPE R aCf'.lG R ABE A/GLORIA L
A VISTA CA 92010 CHULA VISTA CA 92 0
t
-
. 6402401600 6402401700
~EMIKO ~NIO D
CHUL 010 CHULA VISTA CA 92010
J
. 6402402000 6402402100
~TERESA A ~TA S
VISTA CA 92010 CHULA VISTA CA 92010
(' CI r: Of .
C.'.J
COC;()I 6f 6402402400 6402402500
(~.:-. ~,y SABINO A/NORMA P iailAN GERRY F/MARIA M
': oeO-.
c.....' . LA VIrrI ~9201 0 CHULA VISTA CA 92010
'.O<<:<'B
O. JL
-r:" !S 6402402800 6402402900
~ ~
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
,
. 6402403200 6402403300
GILDEA PAUL F/ MARY P MAG ALONG HENRY MERLINDA C
!m-LA VISTA CA 92010 CHULA VISTA CA 92010
J
, 6402403600 6402403700
~NC MICLAT REY M/ROSAFIO S
CHULA VISTA CA 92010 CHULA VISTA CA 92010
-...,.,..
3/- 5'7
(' 0 r.or
O. ell) 6402402600
C 0 el:l Tl ~HARYN M
:J.C 1I )~2010
C 0 e:U-:II
c.Oll
, oe:l(lI
u. L!L1 6402403000
,~
~
6402403400
~/BARBARA A
~2010
6402403800
BALUYOT AMADO I/ROSALINDA
~10
3/-'0
.
6402402700 .
~ VICENTA T
~O
.
6402403100 .
SEVILLA FRANCISCO J/LOURDES
~2010
6402403500
HERCE ROLANDO G/LORNA E
~O
.
.
.
6402403900 .
~ISCO P/SONIA D
~92010
.
-1
c ~ r;-:. .
c., ~
~o I
e.' {, .
00 J:
c. ~ (
~(~ I .
a. ,~
-=-.
.
.
.
",;: .
-"...
.
.
.
" 0 t:' (")( .
c.'- I'
e ~e: ~ll
'3.~ t .
C 0 e: ~.
0.' ..'
cae:',.
o. ~L
~
-
6402404000
DELACALZADA DAVID D/IRMA
~ 92010
1
.
6402404400
~OURDES B
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
.
6402404100
RAM HRISTOPHER D/TERESA G
CHULA V A 9 0
6402404500
~U/MARGARITA
~ 92011
6402404800
VILLANUEVA ANASTACIO
S
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
6402404900
L/EUGENI'~CO N/ROSITA N
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
6402800523
~YNA
~10
6402800527
JOHNSON TYLER DEAN/JANET ELAlt
E
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
6402800531
~
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
6402800551
~LINDA C
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
6402800555
MC MAHON MAURICE R/LOUISE M
CHULA VISTA CA 920~0
6402800559
JIMENEZ LUPE M
SA VI~ CA 92"'0
. 6402800563
~
~O
.
.
.
. 6402800904
..BEASLEY HAROLD
CHULA Vlf'rA CA
R/CAROL A
92010
~.
3/- ("
6402800524
HUjTO~ ~FREY
CHULA VISTA CA
C/CHERI R
92010
6402800528
SCHRECKENGOST ROBERT L/CHRIST
~A M
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
6402800532
~INDA R
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
6402800552
~/CAROLYN
~2010
6402600556
ARENDA~H FRANK
IJ.\.
CHULA VISTA CA
J/MILDRED A
nb10
6402800560
~A
~10
6402800564
~
~O
LTt
6402800901
~/BARBARA L
~2010
6402800905
~~~ :A 92010
6402404200 6402404300 I
MANUEL ~O SiFE E ~ A/ERLINDA T
~H~LA VISTA CA 2010 (HUL V S 92010
t
6402404600 2404700 t
~ F CHULA VISTA
C/O C MANAGER
ISTA CA 92 10 276 FOUR AVE
CHULA VISTA <<
6402800200 6402800522 <<
VILLA PALMER A ~/LOURDES D
'COl.'=: ~ SAN DIEGO CA 92120 010
.
CJOUl
CO~; iY~ 6402800525 6402800526 .
~
C..f\c~
CJ (~(,' HULA VISTA CA 97010 CHULA 10
o. .., .
.&.-
6402800529 6402800530 .
~IAJ NAREAU JOAN G
HULA VISTA CA 91910 ~Tl CLJU02
.
6402800549 6402800550 .
~ TRUJILLO ALICIA
CHULA VISTA CA 92010 CHULA VISTA CA 97010
.
, 6402800553 6407800554 .
~ SHAW SCOTT H/CATHY G
(HULA VISTA CA 92010 ~ULA JVY'I ~~-J2010
" .
6402800557 6402800558 .
~SUELO A SCHLE~NijR FRANCIS DIMARION R
- -
10 BONITA CA 92062
.
f"'~O ~ 6402800561
,l-'.C.l~UG PH RI ANN
_ o<<~ 11
<}.C}I)CULAVISTA 900
onlJl
,;.Cj(;
. 0 <<:i( Jl 6402800565
U.LJL: ~/CORNELL S
. ~10
6402800562
~ANE
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
.
.
.
.
6402800902
LOPEZ LUIS A
~10
6402800903
~LORIA C
~010
.
.
6402800906
~MARSHA S
~2010
6402800907
SMITH JOSEPHINE H TPUST
90
~010
04-04- .
.
.31-~~
1
"-;:..
(' ~ r;'-/I .
ce..
aocll
eel:!:, .
a <<; c~'
c.::"
a(~(l.
oe J-
-'L.-"
('~r-0( t'I
C.CJl
( ant 'e
'3 . r It ..
o . ::r ~.
C'.C:::I ..
c 0':<'1<< A
o . U1..
6402800908
~
~-92010
.
.
.
t402800912
AUTHELET BEVERLY A
~10
.
6402800916
~ III/KATHY L
~92010
6402800920
~ACQUELINE L
~010
t
6402800947
~
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
.
t
6402
RANCHO DEL PARTNERSHIP
C/O MC MILLIN - OPMENT
2727 HOOVER AVE
NATIONAL CITY CA 92050
)
)
6402920400
RANCHO DEL REY PTNRSP
~ARESE
NATIONAL CITY CA 92050
.)
)
2920900
RD SINESS CENTER LTD
C/O MILLIN COMMERCIAL IND t
2727 HOO AVE
NATIONAL CI 92050
"'"
6402931600
~
90232
6410201900
~
~
6422910700
~ARSHA E
~910
31 - (,3
6402800909
REFKIN CHARLES 8
~2010
6402800913
CHUPPE GEORGE II/TERI L
CHULA VISTA CA ~2010
6402800917
~ MARY F
CHULA VIS TA CA
92010
6402800921
~
~2010
6402800948
ATIENZA MILAGROS 8
~LLA VISTA CA 9<010
040
RDR BU ESS eE~TER LTD
C/o Me MI
2727 HOOVER A
NATIONAL CITY
IND
20500
RANC EL REY PARTNERSHIP
c/o MC N OEVELOPM~NT
2727 HOOV ER
NATIONAL CITY CA
6 21 000
RANC EL REY PARTNERSHIP
C/O MC N DEVELOPMENT
2727 HOOVER
NATIONAL CITY CA 92
6423110100
~CA
~
...._'--~
,
6402800911
RIvERA CA~LOS AIMYRNA Y
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
.
.
6402800914
STONE WI AM/MARY
L VISTA CA 2010
6402800915
~LAUDIA
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
.
.
6402800918
~L
~t';""'~~2010
C.' .1
Q()~~ (~l';
() {; ( . 6402800945
C...L03 A RIA
~(){~( '~10
o. .'
6402800919
~USAN K
~2010
.
.
6402800946
~RA
~92050
.
.
.00--
/:4 0200
ROO 8 'SS CENTER LTO
C/O MC MIL OMMERCIAL INO 0
2727 HOOVER Av
NATIO'AL CITY CA 9
.
.
02920300 .
R BUSINESS CENTER LTO
INO 0 CIO MILLIN CCMMERCIAL INO 0
2727 H ER AVE
NATIONAL CA 92050 .
640 0700 .
RANCHO L REY PARTNERSHIP
CIO MC M N
2727 HOCVER
NATIONAL CITY tl
6 2921200
ROR USINESS CENTER LTO
CIO MILLIN COMMERCIAL
2727 HO PAVE
NATIONAL CI 2050
tl
64
ROR INESS CENTER LTO
INO 0 C/O MC LLIN COMMERCIAL INO 0
2727 HOOV
NATIONAL CI
tl
r-~~
~.( Jt 16402931200
'()t':f 11 CMASE INTERNATIONAL LTO
, '.c' '112712 TRANSPORTATION AVE
..' ~ NATIONAL CITY CA 92050
o 0.01
}.Oll
o t:4 if
U.Ll1..l ~OR SINESS
C/o M LIN
2727 HOOV
NATIONAL CITY
PTNSHP
#STE F
tl
INO 0
tl
CENTER LTO
COMMERCIAL
C 50
INO
6410201200
~
O~
tl
tl
/:422910200
~
~
6422910400
~INEE
~010
tl
tl
L/LI NOA
6423110300
TYLEE JAMES G/JCLENE 0
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
tl
tl
31-~'I
-------"1
()f:.1I
c.' t
()n .Ii
c.' {.
OO:}"
C.:".l .
CJ(~()I
o. ,
.L.-.
.)
(' () r-0<
c.cn
: O(::1J ~
-=: .(ll.
C (:;J -j
~.(~ )
a (:1( Ii
().u~
.
6423110400
SPEZZANO JAMES A
CHUlA VISTA CA 92010
.
.
6423110800
SIRLES CARL P SR/JOYCE l
~
.
. 6423142200
~BETH 0
~
.
6423150200
~
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
.
6423200500
~TTY J
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
.
.
.
6423201200
~DO
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
JI ANITA
.
6423201600
D~NN RC.ERT ~~
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
6423202000
MAHONEY RAYMOND W/LILLIAN T
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
6423202900
ACUN~CHARD/CATHERINE A
CHULA VISTA CA 92~0
:[',1
64 910700
RAN DEL REY PARTNERSHIP
C/O MC LIN DEVELOPMENT
2727 HOOVe VE
NATIONAL CIT 92050
31 - ,.5
6423110500
AASEN ROY V/SUE M
CAMARILLO CA 9301~
; 6423140100
.~
~
6423142300
~
~
6423150300
SNYDER WILLIA. W REVOCABLE TF
~
6423200600
JACOBS K~S i H/JOYCE A
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
6423201300
MENDIVIL GEORGE H/LETHA C
~[A VISTA CA 92010
6423201700
~
~
6423202100
MC GILL KEVIN J/JANE H
C~ULA VIStA CA 920/0
6423203000
~
~O
NO 1 L TO PARTHR
64 10BOO
RANC EL REY PARTNERSHIP
C/O MC N DEVELOPMENT
2727 HOOVER
NATIONAL CITY CA 0
"1
6423110600
~
~
6423140200
~RIAE
~O
6423142400
"'~r.-r~
'c.~,_1~
CO~: J
Q (; ): 6423150400
c. ~ -::J ~ 04-02-90
0(: "l~o
0..:) .
~
6423200700
~IKAH
~10
6423201400
~
6423201800
~
~10
6423202700
~ARY T
~O
C' 0 t I"'t(
C e ,"C) 6423203100
CO.: Il~A
oer (J~o
CO.: .'
c::'e~ n
r_ 0.: .-
oeJ~l ~AN EL REY PARTNERSHIP
.~. ClO MC N DEVELOPMENT
2727 HOOVER :
NATIONAL CITY CA
31-" (.
6423110700
~~ER CHARLES F/M ELISAEETH
~A VISTA CA J<O~
6423140300
GUTIERRE2 GEORGE R/ROSA L
CHULA VISTA CA 9~O't
~
..
6423150100
NILSSEN LILLIAN
CHULA VISTA CA 92~1~
~
1
6423200400
~ANDRY~/PATRICIA A
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
1
\2
6423201100
DAVIS EAR
HULA VISTA
t
JR/LINDA D
CA 91910
.
6423201500
ACUNA ELEAIAR/YOh~NOA
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
.
.
6423201900
MANNING JOHN ~NIA A
lJ
CHULA VISTA CA 92
.
.
6423202800
YESENSKY DOUGLAS A/MARILYN
CHULA VISTA CA 92010
.
.
6
RAN REY PARTNERSHIP
C/O MC IN D.EVELOPMENT
2727 HoeVER
NATIONAL CITY
.
.
64 910600
RANC REY PARTNERSHIP
C/O MC LIN DEVELOPMENT
2727 HOOVE
NATIONAL CITY C
.
.
.
.
.
.
/ 1.-- (~
/ -! ~ - ,
V..". \.../) -
,,/1-',
::...-" f ~--'
" I'
Rl='r;FWI":" D
~ ---....-'-
'91 JJN 10 P3:13
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
BY THE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
Ci"!'"V,
'II!
CITY
,,-. .~
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL will hold a pub1 ic
hearing to consider the following:
PCS-90-02: Consideration of a tentative subdivision map known as
Chula Vista Tract 90-02, and community design guidelines, for the
Rancho del Rey SPA III project, located east of I-80S, between
East "H" Street and Tel egraph Canyon Road. The map consi sts of
405 acres creating single family lots, a spcecialty housing area
for seniors, a townhome development area, a neighborhood park, a
junior high school, a community purpose facil ity lot. and open
space lots. The design guidelines are part of the Rancho del Rey
Sectional Plan and provide details for the development of the
area covered by the tentative map. A1 so being considered is a
Water Conservation Plan and an Air Quality Improvement Plan for
Rancho del Rey SPAs II and III.
Copies of the related documents are on file in the Office of the Planning
Department. 276 Fourth Avenue. Any petitions to be submitted to the City
Council must be received by the Office of the City Clerk no later than noon of
the hearing date.
If you wish to challenge the City's action on this tentative .subdivision map
in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else
raised at the public hearing described in this notice. or in written
correspondence delivered to the City Clerk's Office at or prior to the public
hearing.
SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL on Tuesday. June 18, 1991
at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. Public Services Building, 276 Fourth
Avenue, at which time any person desiring to be heard may appear.
DATED:
June 4, 1991
Beverly A. Authe1et
Ci ty Cl erk
) ,
i j!j/>';'J;.;(
ii' '1\--: -(, \
'., ,'\. -1( )
(. ~,"":':' ! "I ..........- ,C_
, '"J'
WRITTIN COMMUNICATION
( S
31-' 1-
Allan C. Olson
-
Chuta Vista. CA 91910-6748
-CDfi~L~A\~-~\~-~~, .~-~-~i1~~'-1-~C~~~B~~~~L~ HOtv\l="~.. O\'~
(;-",C:0L\ ;-,,~"'t0lA.bUlLT_U\J 15.65_____
~, T Efvilf2Q[s:6RY.,U::X.JSTRUc..LLOt,J AWb_M~T ER IALSm_
.3'TOR('\(~E Yi'-\.RD. FORD\:.LA\ R fs\DGE BO\v'\E:S.
.cX\SUJ,J.c:"__TEJ/1PORr\\<::(_ D\RT_, CDUSTR\.JCT\ON ..ROf\.t.J
.WAS bUH... -T-r':J_SCRV\ cs:~ XI \\'::Sc . BOh/1E'5. _THIS D\ r:T
ROAt) \/vAS 'SPR.\UfCU: ueVEX?x-DE'",''C_..IO_ I-':E ['J--' T\-I[~
';::'US"-I I/(j\)) r ] .
FIJrt/.", /j'r-r:'..,..."" )1, pr-.cr:(J I (.'<:C7(
._.,., . ., .....__.. '. , _ '-' j t- > -J~ ~ . l-. ~ ;....; .__~., _
___ \;\Jf''Sm'v'J f'\~ ',\',2l..-- C LEL:,J 0 Fu_{=>.L1 b,tPJ_B~<':'OU Gf\:--l'
, u_ G~'UOW1\1--B..'C- TR\)(J-(S__..i:'':..Ll~LC0RS.....USlJ,:lG__ c.:;c;-(,)s-rr\l. RD-
___~JNJ:::t83_,,_V\ LLP:.__t?8.LM elSa_CONSuLS 111")(1 OET::J _SEPCr'J','r;r
., ___UJJITS_ WL.\S_BUl LT~__\hJSTU\.\)_OF_COMJfJG_.1 N ON ..,Pf:\SCO
__C:NTR('\\:)AVI~\mf'c'LL_J.:JA.\)LD_5TR[)=T5, ALL COtJS n:\)( 'I "r ;
1:;J!m:J)Y\\~O-\\V\c 1~.JOt''-.!.b\RT COtJ:JTF':\J'':'''~!',);J [<OAD G',
,.. _OUJz_J::l.OUSc, T\-\\ ':l tl--J C.C.U_DLL_tlEl\\LY_b_IJI'L.....J:':>UlL _DOze?':}.
_____t:r\c;' ItLr""LOJLE-RS,.. Cctv1CUl~__TR.IjG,_~."LUt-dE>ff_l-'-\ t.l ';:J . OT \- \ C (2
__.~ eJ\)ILDLi'l(.:.,__Mio\TC:.R\ l. Tr,",-uCfC ,_PUJS._BLl,.___U\ r \,/ )C)':2. (\ '- c' "
___lM__LIJfJ F'm' J)J s:\.i:=.Jl r )'._+f~__L':L L HC:._\.)\.JS:j=__\c:V.D\~ \ \or~!.:..!. [ \. /' _.
__\AJ!.\Fr0\Tu_I<J\lr)f .D Pf\-s(oL('\\:Jr\s:_~----".6/...b.\S._CO\)l" F:'cL:J__'! :!;.'
_u_MUu_At,m V..J\-\i'()__TU\ STJR.l E \) t\LL__C0--.'?-S (H..) r::)r .-=. ~:'
. ___I.....tc\t>J':: Kf:-\.nv\Ji'
k: \e t( [i') (', . ')-':._l:.L's::L____ \ T_Y\if\ .~, . U_ L-'~_
.._____~LVJl'-LC-, Ob.J.J\DJ.s-':.:L__KQLn_,l_ht -\ 1\ E Co U t---J'IJ..:.....\"._____
. .~J(':LJ?<:JQ-=.2\_2<J---S..LWGLL-..D~,MJ..LY HD \o'1.C_:::;_ -'"'I,' F' rz c
__mmn'i3LL\.L::I. /\ITWf _...1--:...t,:;T~_LND_C)E_eM~CL', ',,;:;'rK'{-\\) (,
\-JES~.CI.":' '~JTHC_'2'f'\'LC~Q.m': '.U_TS___WJ:::::\(:f-. '\ yy,--
u_____USE\)_L_j:_\J\'~S'LT HI ~'Jc.On"... ,',' f:'.._JtJ .__OV.E.IL_ D LIZ T _e 0 I' J ..'
.S:IRvcr\ O")'?O('\D.Pf'\ST.. O\..W l \C'JSC LTI-\'....
Dv"- .,-
.....)1 _
. . ."~)('.~' " n
'~.J (\ 1" I ",
~j, :.~)_. __J:'__OI:,l----",_
<':<')l,)_~__ \':
\--.JOT_GL ..
\ " ,! I~ " . I .
~-~ :, LJ ~
f'"\. ," ,., ,
.~_~~_( ~"'\ '_I
L_<_\\; . \:: ._~ ,
\V' \ " ,,' \ -1- '1' II , .. ) (,." . -\'".L\ J'.
.' ~ \ . -. . . - \. '. '.' ;
m,,'_' _" '..." . '_.~ __un .__ ,
\ , 'r' ,,3/-, , ., \ ,.! c, -'-'\-, C' \ '
_V\./\ _,...) ,~\~ ~ ~ : _ \ ~ '\. ..1,.._,,-,..._ I,.:' '~__ 1
;. / [ " ) \.J
,; "' ~ )
\' \,<"-,'-,,.,
..._0 __J.~<.J '.1'_ ,_L",
".' },'.
"1 'J; ,
r';",,_-t'. ,-OF:;
J0.'JbDR.\~D. QUI, Ttic DUS:r~-SFI.I',,)j;:.__-8~LELOI,JK.._
_-.CQ_\l~~(;:IL~VER'l'" TH';'J UL. THE'r':_L.QL2LC_LJ QI W~'S..\-LTt:l E
J2L~"""'L_~.L OF PI\SE:O_L[:o..DER...C"BE,Ct:\0SE:.CU= TJ:\ e:
J6/ATER. ~B.oIS'IA.GE__ .. __________
THEel TY(:;.Ll6lf-JEE.R1L)G__AUj;) ~" )l:...DJ.L.lG__Dea...R::r..t1.f"!:JTS
...NOw Sfc\Y_. T~',:S CO NSTg\JCT\.D.tI_R.Q~~_.w.Ll..L...NQT_:3C
__LJ5E.DAG,C\..\u,. ( I_YV0.10DE.e.1L __ ______n______
_lE_~ 0 ~_J:;"i;-.j yR,C_;2,'S J.. ~JT1-~LS .I:l..l R-T .... COr0STRU.GTJ Q.'J
_DQ~s..b\~..:JE. .TO BL~....15'CS' AG:,{\...'..'.LJT_5}:lou' ,) BE.
n _R.E:.LO_Cf~C: " . AS. _s\-\Q',j.J"lQ.w..._6.::rrf'~lC') s\-r'erc..1-L......l:I_.
_W1LL_.Jl::\"'-l'J. BE. ELk'_E.WOly.,t-I EQOM_Exi~TII\..IG ~()t)5J::.S
SO_Tbl.EbDST Wm~nL l3Dnir-:RA~_':c:\30\)Y. AL-:::'O
._......AT_TB LJ'.jg 1.0_ PRO Po SED. .E_~T(7"f\J'J( "': ___TD....II-\ \>_R...cL.~D.
______. _..l'{1utL_W.lLL UQ La N&E rz . t-:::L01.0.__.::2t'JTD._r:=?ASl"'o______
.. ___Lf\DE:.R-A. BECp.~sE (-\T THiS. ~';>QIi'jT__Tt\t=: P20?EK.T.'L
..___.E(::\S_T_ OF nP~SEO L../'~::;"E:r.:.L':L__nl ':;___\3'ELOW STREE T
nn.. _ _LEYJ==L_
.. _.__.____.I3.Ef':O~X'--.MoRL_DE_'1r I n P\""~.I...._1S... At : ()wE..D_.__
-------- E"~__<2S:_ \=>(\S\'=il-.L~'" DE'? :: r- '?A<.r::..L.'i?A10ct-\~~.::::> \VI US_I..
_n'al::. OPE fJE;:L_ U.E' ..8S._8uCo WS T R \ KIlQl'LRD I"':::L_ <:> \S:'...E~
.C 0\\1\ P lET 0 D M(.l.,U'J__ ARTE;.R...Y_u _u_
. .~ :1- ~~__________m
_ _.P......sL..c RO.e, c,J-4i'-:'1' ;,'~l..L_.ARE A~ \ t-,.),\) \ CfU E c, TH F ?ROP...D.SED_
__..Mc..Mu..UhL_MNCHQ_D...EL RE y bDleLOE1::'1.ElJTL_____
.. . ---u----7:f
31= ~n_
r.
PAGE ~oF3
-,-
I
I ~ : ^
~-<// ~~ WJ 1. A ~
n ~.,. ~t::!/ / iF' 'Y'J 1 J / ' / / V
~&#~ ~~~I ''I . /j
'! r- r71~~ / I
~wA..L )1 ~ r;r 1fln~ . _(
~~~~~~ :I#::::.w 0/' / "r-~3 / VI
~ ~~f'.... t::. ~Q; CONST. ~""'\) -/ ~ ct 'I'
~.c': ~. ' I... ILJ""
~ \,\' / L, - ~.r s :z a '---1
~~ ~>7" ',' ' ~~/ Q"- I T. V ILJ '~!' ,
>?\rL :-.' ~l I~ ~~~ ~~ /!
',~ ,. I: I l~ r- f-'v-K SITE of. j
I 'f - II II \ Hlrn IIJ'"'
"J :l:111 oj /j I I I 1 I Ll1JT} 1= &.
" 1111 .;J. I \ , l LlUJ}-l t::: II
, ',,- ~~ ~:-~ J:. lllWj - @
, ~~ 'L:Y \(1)
~
'"
/
L
\
')- ,
~1..E:.r-R
. ~ '" APH
i
f
.
_~ lV
CAN y-
OA..;
\ \
\',
\\
, \
, \
RD.
.
.
I
, .
. .
. .
.
,
3' ~ 'f'D
-
The attached is additional information
for
Item No. 31
3/- rl
'-
in "II'
, '1'1"1
~I ! ", '
,'141!.I'
'Iill'il'
i:i!';J'~
(li:!;:I',
"JI'li
,'illll'!!1
',i,' iii
il!I!I:I:1
...,
~_u_::t._'-~'
i!!11 ,
l;i_1 ' I
hi! I I !
\,,' I Ii II
i" ii, 'I' I'
, lil'I'!" ,1'11.1/1 i d
I. I~ ...'"
illl! L~ lU IliU
'I! I! !I!I !
Iii il'; 11'; 11'; II,;
I' "I! 'hil hill' !;Il
ti!li tlli! 1m! im! ill!
.":"
I
Ilimi
I~~;'~;';'~
I,mill
,liiiiii
,mllll
........
m!iln .
II II III III :! !\ I II .
" " I I "'II I,
, , 'I ,I ' I
1,'1 1,1 III III I',i !'! ili
, I ,II ,II "I ,I II' "
Iii hi hi h! lit I, Ii Iii
e III III III III l!lllllll i
I II ., iii II 'I' ,I
i~ ,; Ii :; ~I! i: ~i j! I
ilil! ill(i I!ll i; III 1 ii~1 ; !
1;\ 1IIIlllMlli
eeeee e e e
. eee e e' . e
15 '
II! ~~
S 'j
i i1i:iIl
!" I i
~ i ill
ct)..':...:i.'
en ::::'(
~mll,
~ II! lillI" ~] '111111'11' n l"'IIIIH '11'11111
'Iii I' III !!II'111"11 i I~! 11111'! '1'11'1, 'I 111!llill
Idllilllll"!11 illlll!"'i!'lll'I!1 'I'ill'
~111~ .lll' 11"l'lljliJ11 ill Ultllll 11!,1 III III'"
~l!~ I! ,Iiijl';ii~ ~llil!!: Ililili!ii'!! !'il!; ,:lllal!!l: ,
~illili~ Illl',I!lJI1!1 ;i~~i~ 'llllili!!'~1 'li1f: !!!i!illl!jll,
~I:;t.llll!:l.iljl lili1!lbUIi.ii!il:u;i lillill:irllibl
.:.;.t .. ':.0.: .t.. i ~ i ~ :i i . :; i i ~ ~ i Ii
H ' . I I I,
~' "'''l'~d - I Ii Ilhllllllhhl I
,. " ' i i i I Ii' h
I. . II J,LI _LIlLI -----
p~...., ,€: l it.... !......~l:.. J..a............ 1 .. :I~""
'II" ,.) " ~--;;-;--~1~-~-;--"l
," 1_' _:_~. _:_:.:_ ' --~---!.-- I
, III::' :n': , I
ri !, I - -,- ----,-..- ----m-- I
~ II ! ,', i (I:: :::::::; :::-, !:~!; :-;-;!~;-n I
~ I I . ;~ ;:;:::::ii ~:i:l~~~~.; i i ia~.; . 11
-, J Ii - ~i !i!-:E~! !!E:!::: ----iiI-I i
1101 ' ill i i I ili i i I it '1111 \1111111'
III '--1-- : - :=:=:= ===-:-:-:- I 1.11111 I
11 ,-I. '. - .. ..
,,- " . ., -~-'..-
, 'r~-----rJ
, -I ~ ~
. I'.'
i !M li '
III' "
!.it I! ,IJ,
3/-':f2
~
~~-\\
\
2:
I
I
I
I
I
li '
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I ~!
j ~I
. -..;... .
..
..
l_
i:
--
, Ii
, . I
-j I
l.-...~-....iiI
3/- ~.3
I!
I i
'" ,
:;: I II .
a .o;
II~ I ,
':i : 0
G 11
~ kl:1
Ii tdi !
~ '. i
.... :.
~I
I
I
I
I
I
C'<I.
I ,
01
ell
Q.O
z
it)
~~,
j::1-
ffi~
~c(
oJ
~
:J:
o
~1
....,. !
S1
-1:
>- 0$
o~ 01
~! 0 a!
~I .1
I.
l
~
~II
! : I
~ I.
,
N
I
o
Ql
Q"O
~Z
~l:;
~<I:
r;:l!:
~~
~!a
j:::>
,j
::l
:J:
o
""-~
"
3/- 1-'1
-'~ '?
(.
n
.: iI ;
! ~ ~ "
~ I CD
i
! III
!! "
~ 11
Il .i;:1 .
15 .!!: Ii t
Ii (11 ;
~ ~:.i I'
~I
. i
I
! ~; i
~ !
(>II
I I
~ I
Q.Ol
~~I
~gl
R<e
~...
~~
f..;j
::l
:I:
U
'. '.~_""'-o-
\,.~ ~ --~~ ~~
~t: ~ ~ \ ~~?'~~~-.>-~ ~~-:~IlI~
~ ~"- '\\.'"'\ \...i: ~ . '~~ ='_
'~> \\ '~",~-. ~i~"'~~~ , ..
\ /i\>i, ~) 'l "~ '~ \\\"'-9, ~
. ,....r""'4>~,,,. ;'c D ,~, '''''~
8 ~. <A.~,1 ('""/If \ l'" rl~\~ ~"\ (
I.~ '-~'''''J- - h~J''l. '~., -1\ ~ ,.A. A'l)., J',
I~,:~ ::";'Hi'~ Il 11~t11;fE. ',~ \"c;:.-- L_.::!o ~/'~X/ 'l
' -~,~ I ~'. ' " y, '/'/
It" . ~,~" "I' \ "e' T" --- .-.-=.;:..- J<.-... ~/~ /'
' , .. .L--- /: u//,
' -- 'h _i#<" . '! iH' :i'"../ ~~<.
ic" . "i'-~~I/~ j'/,-"--~><~/z-.:"~.:...
h '- '>l ~~. '''.'ifse. I f'~~~____ ., ~~21'C0;:.~>~
-'"I ''!!:.Jii . "" .' ~ ~'~
\ I >JIj. ~ is ' ~'-'-_
1;1i\ '\ !! /\jV..... l~ :::.I-J, ~, ~ ~~ ~/. "~)
1,) , !ll:.. ~_I ...#'~I \ i.. Sii ~
f/ /(. \ .-1'l\ - , '; "'-'I.IlL" , '1'. ,',_ //.
( I ~.~, u ''-1''''1.:'':'. , ,.., , h'~,: I,
I. X'.' , IIi: '; "':- ~:'i : ' . 't h '''?~./.~ ~ ~ ~( \~
~ ....~\... ..\ I i %,.:, , I .'iT 7." <';. \ t kJ\ ".'~
\\\\ \ ~ 'f ~. '-'~'K~'~'~
II ;, \ ,. ~" :,,^", '-'< '" ,.-:...;:
11, "1" I lJ~t, 'o.!/ !~. / 1. ,", ~~ \-f! .~. '. :'Z",'
! ( ::-:-;;" ,J!.. "'. "o>'"~ ". ......"-...
I , '1>" .... ~.n, ",' /,. '.. '<.
\ '" :''-'-' ; "., -- '" ~
' ',," t., ,,' '/ .. ;;. ,\ ~"C:~":
Ik'\~~':\~~~"~ ~ .~ <" ",,;>~~~,~ ".' \
Ii ~ ~"lm \ . ... ;~~r;~ \,.<:;.
" " " ,
'" ''-'' , , ' 'L""" ,t, 'c,"
". \' \~~~.""~ ...~'\'-;"'~:/; . ~ ~ - -i. " i Iii ::J.' g I
II \ \ "\1i" , K ~.m'l _ '" ' , !: \ (
, 1t'\('\I\~"-'/,. ~' ;,." ': . I iii'!li':
i j ..\.\t. 1 .~ ~ \ \ 2'{.....J ,.,'.. . . 'if..~. "\.', &'
IU' '''', - " ,', "11""\ d..
'j]", ,,~, .' ',,', '" 0
;o;;c. '''~ 'L~_ ',,,,, .. '''. '.', '\~L'\ r\.g
. ". I. . " .. >-<,
I,~'"d :jI (t;, '~i - .-; ~f~,\f-- 6 i
"~-;",m ., ~ .. "" -. ':'r -:;'L'l~\'f ~ .I
~) 'I"f'fjl' \)~'I; ~\I :1.n;..'~"ri2r.~..",:/.",.. i--C',01'{1'9.'".. ~Ilrl ~''J al
II/I' Rio! ~~c';:' -'. ""'~., I
' · - ~\ ""IJii,'(7;/-' '''', .' l.i~ ~ v/ <
hi . \'(/-/IJ{...I'\~_-.,- ."'&"'. ~~i,~ '. ',' .1
.' - . I\~\~ '". i~' ~ .. ~~ ~\~"u.j I .;;;.. .
~ ~\--:U' '," }n:~ . 1
>~\i ~. J"-i ,
---- ~-,\
3/- r5
'~' '~'(l\'. '
I.~,__~ " .~\\~\'("'. ~~~ 1,-,
~~:;J~\~ · ... ~ . ~,.' ~"l\(\ '~ J;, ,'-- . J
'I' "I""""" \\\'\ ~~~'{' , .
. .- "~ ,. ,
. \" ~. ~ ' "
;~, ". 1:~--.. .. l' '" ~. \ ~_\~~ :-.:~'"
~"o...;.,,*," ~'!.i. .'/, P' :7 "\ ).~~'~ "
I~..' ,~;;-x !i(:;~ -d7j\~ "~\ '~\ ~
'\ ~ '~~> '~fj ~ ' '. '\~0 ,~~~\ \ \11
, '~~~"\~".a-\:\' i,'-..;.~. · \~ Q, \
'~ \CY"'.ff1,';"'~~~"\..;' 0. . '. \~ ~l;:"
~-~C, .' ~: !io:. .'4:':."." ". n ".' \.' '~~ \'
~'~-' .' -"J~', ~', I' ~ ,
-",~ ' , ' " ~. .\ ..l;' I ' .' t., . \, \ \ \
l~'-Y ';', .' - ~,.,~ - "~. :'< '\ /I
~ ,". -[~Ij uk. ft ~ ' ~',.. ~~
~;~"-~'\"~V':f):';:' "'~'~_~~:.' .. \' ", !\.~,
'~~i ::=1.:;;/ ~ ", .. ~,,~, .. \
~ '. \
J' ,~;~. I, ,~:'~~~ ~ ,\ . 'I,,~:I i!" ,>, ,
f ~~ '?~..a.I\I..\I~III{~"'.,"" \, ,!,;., ,5' (,
~.. '';; I ~ ,"~ ~o--C-~~~'II\~ !\\\\n-\ , I i!1
,'I, ,T fl"_ _: >., ,~--t"" ., :::\:\\I\'c\'~ ~: . . I,' .~ '~\ '
'.' '. 0.,";':.. -!t,~.~ ~~\>.::-<.~ .._c' _0. ". ~n!\\" \. ' ~\'~..,. "',' ~l~t h\\\
. 'NJ,i':!6~,-.r,;'LE--::-; 8~~\ I~\"" ~v . ", ..I::'~\~\~l~
\ :k~>f~~",~:~l ,~~ '~\f,)~J'/ ....", r\\~,~~~~ \\,.\ e
. -~ \t- ~i1 ~~ ~i-<~;~~. "-'= " .~ jIJr./.', '/) . \ ~X"'\ ,~, ,
. .' ~ 9;'1 t';L,g,g .' . ~~'l . , _~ ;~ ' . I .
I ~"f'~-;' 1;.:::". - ~),. , .....! ", ..1:\ \~. \"'" .
' ~ ~ ,,'-. - '- . '-.: , '. .'&-J;-( ~.')1 ., \\~~\ .'
' ." ,I, ~'L r 1/; .=-- ~~ . ~'~_ ~ ;:;~: ,$?r~?* /.(,Ii.
' I ' II >- ,Y., lJ;>, ")(,f7:t". .
( :'~1'C/cPJl\' .... '. ~ '/i,~ / I .' t.-... I ~ i
I:' ,- ,~, ;.! -~ ,~ - ",. ;Jj ., ."IO,j> ,.\ 1 ~ .
: '\cf80~~, ~:' :. - "~'~ i;~ r,.. ,1"~. '. _, '~,
7 ,~;?!fI/%?t!/1~ '_~_' - '== _ _..L~- ~-;. ~. ,./, ~~
tt- --.r_ 'ti, ... .. ""'''' I H, ~. ~
fW " ' '?' ~.., "XI !"~ a.g
!IW'~I~tf--\'l.l!.,~'fJfif:~ it i it , i;i~. ~' .' 9i1(1 ' I \ l~:\\ -;f ~
H . ~ :J. 1\ 1( 0 ~
'~. '
"'~l!il ..;~ ~ " '.A71!.!'~!':./-"~ 1"1111'
~ i 15 ..I 0 'j. "\ , ~ 't' . I, ~ H \ 'I J I'\::
. ,;:.. ih ,~ if . - ~~.L 'r' me, . "....., " ' \ It'". I~ a
,.>".-~ "ill ,'; tlg'~-;-~~~' l,\<.~'~,,,,;:;,~' , \\1:' ~il\ .\, ~ ]<
:.v- 7"",;:,,,. 7i~ ", "", ' ~
~ .. D J.33HS 33S + ~ P.i" .: ~ ,c"",- tj,II" , ~' i-
,~
, -I,;: 1" I
. I .. I
.r' , ~ 1 ~I i ~.
'.,' ~i~;
I'TI!"'~
i ii:.
I!l m"1
!: ; I "
.' b :" t
'~ lm.r
' ~'.I
I
. : I
~ ~, I
i I!
ell I
61
. Ol
Q.O
~z I'
::e l; Ii
~~I
i=: < I
i!,...
~~ I
~:s
:;,
:c
o
....
3/-1~
.;, ",c,. - ... I. i I
" "f~'~' .... -=~,..,..\\, ,,> , ,. '; !~i.I~' ,
, !,' ,"m, . ,~ - '" .....;co '"',"
:,~, nC_ '_if' ...,..... , . \ II ' i -
'I" \\\,!- J i ~7:i.:i;:_'f':'.l --,,;4Y Yf~kl\ ~ \'V-1i'il,';), .' ,',
I, r I,', ,\ :l W,.j.:TI ;.;;*fQ;4~-- 'fR, ,i\ ~: ('.!JJ. ,; g ,1:!4i I
. 'I' . ' .; ,,,y~<: .,,:' \l "", I f" I
" ,,~. "'cV.y,, '" " "
. .. ""'". ' ".~'_"_ , Ii I
'Iii' "",' '"' ,,"" ",,' I ~ : 'I
~.' : i:,,, -'t,,, ." , . ..~~'-' ~~'~c\;~;:, " ~ ~ii '1
" ' , ii,' . ~ ' ' ' ftj - flltl~ '" ... " .1
;:;,!!, ": - ~;.J ",: · . ,d'J"':'~'~~\~'~~~' \ ~ I'
!&)liff~;, ,\ ,p.!' l!l! I ~ ~_~~'" ',- "~\~~ ~~,
*',~ . -,.." .-
, ')' ." " .. . -l,. " ,"'$> " ~~
,'W' .~,,,~ · " ' ", ',-'" ,. I.
""'1'i ",.'" !- j , ' . "t,,' H ~ I
I~U!I ~ ," :J; \ . \1 ,,) ,L'.
'c~l ~ _,. . >'" ."," !. .: 1;1.
iidi : '" ';.,.. -" · · ' ' . ' ' '
W~ >' ""V" .. ..r.u. . I
:r. " 7 ~ ... . '. ~ ' ~ ~ >.'
,," ..(, 1.' ,. _' · >'~'~--"""- J N I',i
",' , ,. , ',' ,. rm "," \". , "
~ .' 0 "
_ [0>-' I
_ ' ~ _, ," "I m "
,,,:, ~ ,,,. ' .' , "'" ,. Uj ~" J _ '- ::&i~ ~d~ 1,111
",,,~~ . -. --- ,- ..
llHr, , " . - ,," ""'I' - ffl'
'.C ,'I"" 1.' " , -, n:;" .:RJ ~~, . !:!~ I'
\ I' 11'\1'" _~ _ _,' /1 ,. ; ~,,~, J ~'!' ~~ II
! ... i.-If " 'I,' ~ II)
, . ...' " - ~ "'" ,.
I ..;'" . ,\ .\ <!J):1'", ,lNl'" l ,l, . ~:;:'
7 ~' I .~ ,'. .. III [,!\' .' ]!M' "
;jJi,!l. -:. 'I!:" ~\" -,>.1. ~ ~ " . · " , · ·
i1 /" . ~1 :0. 1%:l .. . ' ',' u' ,/
I' ~ ., 'I '" ,- ~0Il n<"'.' 0
'J :~Mtfk,'{pl~jj ~" ~. ;,~~,..-<<~ .'~ ~'t II
i Illwt~'~'k ~@ZPi';...J;l~>;f '.." ..',;""' !:iU
I! ,,:" I", .\ :: ~,<:~ _..'1 'I"~ ...,:", ,,'I' Iii I ~ I
'" ,'> ... .<<" -~. . ,', ,...:!"
I~ i\'>- _ .w.,p ~. oJ" -,' ,,_:, r~ " ' ~~ I
I @ ,(~ --:-'.:;::', Ii'\-li: · .-@, . ~ '- , ~II. 0: ': C'i j
! J. . lD~ '" "I ..,., '. "' .-'" . ;\ill- O'
~. Mti~ ---=Ilfi,.o.., ~", ,'.I, ~ It ~lE ~
~), .., 1{} f/!1\.. ~ --'"' -Q ." . . ' I "U II
. rn~ ~'- ;:"',~'rc_-""'f".,.~~_~~11
, I \1 jl\},( ;- 1.1 t ::=,-j7 r ' ~ .- Ci/~
, ,," '_ !e.., '" ''ii:~ . I i
_ u .... " ''\ p.
3/- ~r
-
.~
,.'
,-, '
.. i .~~:; .: ,:'.
c. ~. L .r
~-
~
1
.
\
, J' i;
ii a . ~
,.... ~ I;~~ I
. i --,-- :
. i I!f
a ii II
5 .!lq. .
~ fl!! I
~I
l
.
l
.
.
N'
I I
gl
Q,ol
i ~z
. ~l3
~ ~c(l
i::(!:1
~~I
~~
~j
.::l
:c
0
gj
&
~i
, ~j
,
a~
III
..
3/- y. i
;......,.'...,..:,.
, "'!:o<.""
,;,g,:I-
.
I
I
,', '1;;~" ".: ';':'9l""'r' ii, ,,'
. ~ ol:;.. . __,. .'f' ~
. '
",,:, . '-'" .
.-
,,"';'~
:rS,.t::p!:_~ \ ~.
~1
~, cl
~j
Of
" OJI
\n al
\~11 .1;
~ ...,.". 1
,~~~~~~/~1
,'t*,;-Z,Wy)"!!. \it.ll
. .
}\ .
';,',
...
. i~'I'
: 'P'
""': T - :.
-" II< ".1
,,' It I "
, L.~'C~!. !
,C '. .
,I
"!
'-
- - I . - . ~-.-- --.
~. lle\\ Illhllil~[
~ ~ I I
en g I
>'0 II 1'111
W ~z I dill jlllll
N-:it ~lllIplllllllllllllil
.... W ct' ~ 11.111111111111 I
...I > ~
W i=;;'~
C ~I-
z!!!
O~;
:I: ;:)
() ,n ~-I
z
<C
a:
...,
;i" "11'
. ;llil'~ I -
. - ....
~:,4~!'I'
~hl{'I'
i:il'~I'i
lli;l;ll',
"JI'li
',illl,',!11
~,,: Ii!
':1111'1;1
I;, ... II
:.-u....-.-...
dl
:lll' I !
iiI. ,-!I! !! I!
, lIii,';ll,!!!!.!!!!
IIII( I,I! Ilidiii!
1l!.1! ! I ! I I!
III! !ll! -!Ii! iii! I-!Id
Mllb!! 1m! Iud ili!
r~-c--I- fj
11,1
i !M Ii
! 'III ",
Ill. '.-,
i .1
'III
II
, -.
,.
98&8.'.8
iI ll,11 1,1 :' !! I II .
~I ~I ': ': ~I III :;
1I'II'I!Il!11 Iii,'! ;Ii
, I 'II 'II 'II 'I !I' 'I
Iii hi III III Iii !; I Iii
e iZl ~ I1n ~ iZl iZl,iZl i
I II ',Ill II 'j I ,I
i~ ,~ l~:; ~I!i: ~i j! I
I'j I'! I'j Iii Iii I'j II i~ '
I II "I I II 'I
1,1 lid I!h J.! I Ii
eeeee e e e
..
15 : .
I. J ,
ia"'1 llillii
...11 ......
~ lu..1 II"""
l!. ,;Illili.
~ ~ ~ _ liifiiii
o ~ ~~ , illllll
:l ~~~~~' Ii
D lillll .11111111.
~ I!! II II~' II"'! '1lllliS!ij 1I11'I':I~ 11111 : II '!II,II
'I'i, I!I, .1\'111'11 I ",!I'I,I ',!, i!l'll
; Iii li!i il'lll i!illll '11& Ii
1\1'li~ ~~ I!I!! I !!:;~ il~;~JI!II',1 !I!!!I'I'" !llI!:I,l! II:!!! i
t\ ~ II I'll' ". 111'~th 11'1'1111 ,I'lil ~!l,l
i g !'liill',IlI',i,I,lilj'llll! j"'lh' I,'
:!"!,- ..I'll Ijh ! d'11~,:11 iI""IIi'! : ,Iii I I :
~111 u; Illlllll~1 !'il~!'lill l!i!l!i~I!!'lllillllli.! Ii" I'll
I . I ..... ' .. ,d," I 's! 1'1 I
~11;(.II,I!i ,Idl lill1.lbl.!ll.llIll.lldllll!.lIllillllllnlll I
.,..; .. ol~ ol....:I i.:i ~ its ii ~ ili
,I I I,
I h 11111111 I,hhll .
II hhLh hllidu ----~-
i. ~~ !!~'~I~'" I..S............ . . ........
, 1'--;-;---;';" . l
" . .;. . ..... <I Ii
I. 1 - --- ------- ------
III'" ...... , 1
. n ~. I - -~-~-: :-:,:,.: ----.,'~ ·
~ I'. .' 3: 1-" :: :::::::; :::-' ::~!: :-;-~!:.;-n I
~ I I ;~ ;:;::::li ~:::;i2~2:: i _ j2;.: i.
II J i,- ~ EEEj jjjEE: ----n( i
I. ( , :11" Ili' · II Il 11111 llilll II
II --,- -- -------- ------- I, ,
._ 151,'"_ : :-:-:--:-- :--=--=--=--ij'llu" h
3/- gO
I i
c..i ,
~ I, i
a "\
I Iii I
~. 'e
i i if
· ,,~~ .1
Ii a;11 I
." i'li .
~ <t'j ,; I
~I
. . - - - - --:\,
~ '..;... ' \
.., \
' \
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
, \
'~ \
\
\
'. \
~ \
- - .....\
\
-
z
I
I
I
I
CII.
I ,
01
~I
Q"OI
~~
co'
~~,
j::1-
ffi~
~<(
...I
;:)
is
gj
~~
CSj
o~
o~ 01
a!
.1
li '
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
'---
I.
i:
,f -, I i~'
, l !
", I
,I,
o .
oJ I
l-....___
:f.E:: l~! 0
,t: 0 ~I
.. " .
[-, '''~I
....~
...
3/- i I
.
:
f
. I
I
I.
N
I
0
Ol
a.O
~Z
~13
1;' ~<C
, !::l!:
~~
~s:
,j
::I
%
0
'-...~
"
\- !
kr \
, 1
~l
~ I,
r I
I'~ ! I
tl
3/-S2..
.
;. ". ~ -~.,.
\ ~-~ ---~ ~~~
~b~:~ ~'~. \ ~~\~Pd' ~~~~'~~~~-~A
'f.4~ " :tir~\ --, "\00 ,'l,,,,"\:, " ':~~
\ '>.~ ' Br~( f;i ~>>'" ...,,,,
t-l~ v. '~:3."-' ~%~~;::--1..'~'~rmD ~:1 ,\.~~\\\ ~."~~.' '.
:7, 'lit ""," <. . " ?=, I
nJ /. " /m.,X. . ">~,\ 'f/.-',j I
.::-..~~v]= :~1i ... [1' ,/:-.. -~1-;:- W!' "'1-8 ~/./j,
-=: ~ . ~e.1 ., \ a:lIj..:: ' '_'-- ~" //
'. i-~ _, 't, ___ .;/
.. -. ' .\'J'~7 ~. '., \;. . ~ _-:- "_, , /' _____ /. '
I1l "',""" ~ '/"., , ',_ ,.' _ ',<j ~ /
~~ " .~:.': .....~'1.J/~-;:~...:.
If. ,', ........ .:]:., ,.-'t~~5,~
:.}\ ~~.;' "0 ,': ;t 'i..;.~~~~j;: )
~ ," ,. · , .. I -,>Jf(, Lite """""_ ___.._. \ ~.." ~ .
(C.,.. · !4>L.-fJI"'" ,... " __ ,h{ ,
I,l,\ ~ 1)..' r J~' r-j-'fJ1 ".' "&~~..::%~.~.~. (\~
'\\ . '.' '~:.:'1 '~i ,l;;.: I l-;V\-. '--, / \:." \ . "\.... l~. 1\. '",,.;
\\\ '. ", I. .. ~ ' ", ~~'ic''-.'
1~\:f ,. ~:t "-' ~""", ~~~~" r~
.. .J..!J,: . ....... . ". _
· · ,"'* 'x" ~" '. ,.
:-; "A, - "" ~ J' . ri._\, _,
. \) "'~ , ",\" .
\ ' \1;' '\~~ (/~,i<... . : [I, .
" \\\~~ '\\~'\~.. '~'..- . ~1~\tl'~:~..
"l~\I1 ,', ~". "'V'1 J
I ~l ':. """-'&v lIIi,i " """c, ~I ,~ >-=l ~
I ~2fA~~, . -- ..' :~ "'3,lt', -" ." u 'M4l ~, " :: l'o,:l ~
I~_'~'t ~~~~'r't " '''~',' - ~ ':; __- a,
'-;e ~~ ~~."~ :; 'I!', ~I'>t\~.;: -" '~ I~.:,' -. o~
'..:~ -.L ~ i'fuJ'" ~~'1' ~ ';"''''J '. -.. - -C'~i~\~~I.\::? DB I
. ':':lo..";.1L1>- -\\j. -~ _ '~M' \, ') ,
--..'..... "ili= -!, I ,
'=~~':" -.. ,.-.- , · ' '~n ,-', 0
~I illl@illI:>':,~ ~-~r.)~~ ~~ ~l
' , I ~~I~\J1'~Rr,', "Ii.~/ tt
h!i \- <~. -( ,,-' . '},~ ')1"1., '~~1' ., ~~. ___ _.1
\;;' .. i . , . ~ _ .
!--:'i'i \ ' . i \' ~
~ '~\. Ii... " l ~
-~_,.'H - i' .crr-'.L:."',
----*1-
, - /' .
.~ '?
~,
3/-8.3
.\ ~ S
: ~ I ..
q OI,
~
~ ;
.~ Iii
i ,~pi ::
1; ,!!; I. !
5 i,1!1 .
~ ~;.l I.
~I
I
I
I I
! t ~
i I
N I
I I
~ i
0.01
~~l
~gl
~~
~Iii
~>
f.;j
:J
:J:
o
~
-
I
C)Q
~
f
- ~ ~" . ',_ ," ~~ ~L- _' -~-=~ ~,. ~;~'lff.f7)7,~/j' x".~\y\ -:'" E e;~"" -Jl>:'~
, ,.~~' ",. , , ' " - " ,CT' , ,,',",:-0 ' ," W';!" V\~:, ,'I::: J,~-'~
11Th-.I.;U lilh' _ ,,.;, \,',\ {.,<(:,."-" "". '. -1' b-_,'~ ~<:-.: v~"-'--'.:;,:_ ~o/"';$','~:': '4:~ ", -', 'ij\ {~Hfr;ft:(~""", ,);\, \.(~;:::;j , , ~; ~
'" .,,' -;>, -I'-( '. '/ '-- " ~....": h, " , II , A . ". /lPll.X ~~
: 1 ,;O-01lAHCHE'Ao ,. ~'i,-.;,~--.:c"~,,,<,-;;,,:',/J I('lJ'., ""'" \ ""1",", ',' 0/\:,"" ~:&u' -' /....- {(
tSEENOl!:NO.~. r , ~~\u:? rJ- .r'["F~.~""';;;:'"~\<-f"Y\ /'~P' . .' ~.:; ~y'(:K\,..' ~
: ","_HO._~>r,',,' .~:V, %8, "J~J,;:- \ ',~~~~0'J'1,J(p.'1r.~;r~~~))I1\\\'Sl i;.:' '" i", x~" '~~t~, ;'. ~
~ ;". '.' v, '~'" . -'~r;Yjfj 'IPJW'Z~~:::::::) A\ \~ ,;:.l-. . (\ ~~:;.~
- .t j'~ -ht . ....~- ~~" '..(~::1~. ,') . J..- .'"
,~ \ " CHULA VJS,':"~, ~ ' ,XO". ~ ~'ti"~j3' ~ ~s-:-~' !.~, -: ',\ ~~.g;"
J SCHOOLDlSTR.~~" .,,- '~" il"'1lii 1< ,\I~~'/I ';;''':/ -. '\~'T";'C~>(v /{6
. "\ , I ,- v '\ 'II\:: . c\ ',>, '0' ' , ~}M'~""" ':i?;;~
\1 x ~. \ ... '\\.'J'LC" yo -.~ . . 'Ii ...-
. ../-~.J" I .\', . 'i~ . \I,/I!.~, '-''''''''.,M> ";'''~ "'1 ""~"
.ft' "gy--- 1 "fi'\ -, :~ ~ I, "" \~~\ Ii.. _, \'1 ,.,:) \~W~ ~ ~'\' .~. 't,~~. '1. ,!, , ,~ " .~ .
,'- _ I ~ik' _ '_-4) ,,) \11\\\\": , " ~ ~~-,"I' I [1/ 11"
4" '"\"'I"\"I-Lr,_,' ,I \~)J II i'''' "j' ,." ~;;, </,~,
" .1 I I'!' ... ~'I ...\fo... Ill'i\,,:' ,--"""'''1/''; .'(/;,..,......., ~
, ""'"'I'" ,1[ ,,;;-, ;-'J)//, ",.~^~ ,,-,,,,,_"" - ,.,
~\$ ~:,: ',.'1' :!':' , ,~Z,'t "~j\;:i/~~v^'L''''-' . .'~.;/
- 1f17 .,_ ~ ' ,.; '_:,~\'..._.~\l'~~,. - ,.,., ,,~>-- ] ~ ~ " :, ~'7.'-:....~
.. :J~%t~i.:,;, ~~;,: /.;~~~c-.~_~' /< J;c~
'~ .~~~,., ' . -?de" -j'---, ~~;:'~ /",/ ,~~ ;/ ,-...
T\ .: 1.<;;:1","/"1. :/"~." ........" ,..," ,.,',,' ~ _.' .':" ,;;~/.;: ~(-::;:0 ".
~~,-=~- ~.-t,'/lt ,~-:"~_' -- \1\1... '1-.," AI:"'/ - _:-:/~ ; ~/. 'Y~'~'/~~~. r .-
:- ,; ~ ; "~~. .... "', .,it ~~ _ _' ~ _ . " ~~~/:/7~/___ .<j
i:..:,c:; ;:...-/. \, .~-:~; , ~ ~-"- ",'-;" .-:~; ,:-"~~/,_~~~/; ,,~..- ,
:;:;~.... 0; " .,'~ ',y, x~ -. .~~ A.....; __~-", . N
~~~ -~~'~ ,~-.'''i~~~" ~ _ >' . ~;? _J~;, - I~
?'~~ (" VI '... _ _...';,,,-;&::---~v ~ ~ =<~' ,
::.:t=l ' l"~ -~g~'':;;~~. ~ ,-;P ,'~-;;iio""'- rf.<"':'-f-"~,.1' .; ,
---:, ~ ~ --::'i; _:: . ::F!'.-- ....- -,,'
~~-::ii'--- ----, -......... --~-';- ~-~ ~i"J.------;'" '. '\-....~ '"
,~,:.o,;.;..-._._":~~---'-:'.J.' . ~!p-J./ ! r::::.:#- -" .-
:~ml(iii?~1'\\\I/Y ',; ~_..... " .' ., .......;.""CHULAVIIT......;."OO-.. '
I!IiI!nA~TrrHO om nli'V TENTAnVEMAP """'-"',...... ~Prqedn.um~)" ~_L.
1!!~~I7iIheRard-o~R.y~ CHULA VISTA TRACT NO. 90:-2 .:. rb,'('" =~~;;:":;;;''''~' ~_:.;.
~. 0
I
I
. . I
.' ~
"
J ,
, .
~
,
. ..~
,\ " ..
.~,.\
---
---....--.- -~:~,..
__,. ~M'1l.61I"
,
,
,
"'I' : r~\\ r~:
',~
,~'~
:r:;p:: i-
)~ '\ ~1.'1
,J(1~' : ,
Wff~ii ,I ~(
~if _ ~xx.' a-
~_~~~'s,:
~j" 'r/
:~V: " ~
:,1" r,O.! JJ( ; i':\' - b
", ,\7 '" " ,.
I~i j' f ," \,~ ,-
I~ (..' 't- "'~'# ~: .
2\,) 1, :/~ " ~B" "
-at -I" .. ~ .
,- -
~ ,.u" I ~" ," '\'"}IG.\." r-:
'~, ~ ' .., _ r, ,-
'x "'" ' ... ...
\ I~ ~
I, \l\II': ' ..,,~ - - - '
I ". ' .\ · .Iolr""" .
I' '~\ I . :..;-, ~'i 11 ~'~.. ~,
:, '~" -:~. 1.;; ., 1\ 'l"l V..:..; , J'
/r ~ii", ., ~ I\d ..j ~"i' ~ ..!<",,-,
~'r( ,,:II"'(~~' :l-~\il':''im' *' ~~ p.'"
I ' ,'''''it " ~\ "" ". ~\
,A' III 'j '" ~.';: .,,;., " ~,i1l ~
'I "'~ lX:C ~",. <Y ',.", ,'"'..'
,
. "
, , _-=;::<-4i* 'I t " ...'"l~
'// ,y ~c' ',' -.
11 ~///Y - 11;'0
, f~~~ _, _ -, (1--1=l,
) m ~ K~J ,~-
~ [I ~1! 7,
, I'
.
~ '\
..;; 'I,
",'
'"
b-'"
'fD' "
'. "", ~
'-- -I ",'" -
-','--f r' -. '
L---', - 1 .
" -'-I'
.
,
....
"
3/- is
.'.( I.
"
." '
..1):;;.:.,:-'
. J,q
~ I , I ~
I ,i I'~~ i
I, ----., ,
, ~ I,: I
5 ~"
, I!s illl "
" ~ . Ii i~ I- I"
\\ ~~Hli
',I. / ~,. I
: II. "
, , ' I I
~ I"W th ,~, ,
~: ,1\,( ~:!'
I .' 1 , I;
\'~ ,~ -J I I' ! . I
I . , I
\r- ~ .
.
.
N'
I I
gl
0..01
~z
~t;
~oct)
j:::1=1
i!~1
~~
j
.::1
::t:
U
~- -
\
.
\
3/-8b
gj
!
Sj
~j
a~
III
.
~",' \\{\'~I\lt~~ 'k ~,' ,~,S\\r!l!~," ~~':.\~\~\'~:' ~,lil~d
1\, V\~ \ . v.......~ "'. r~" ~"" . ~ fI I
~i~ I " ~ 'K .('I~'" ;\~;,~. ,.~~;, i 'J0.~N~\ \\~;r~': lii.~'
. \ IUJ;.; .l\~ \. n. .' ~ ~ ..1Jl'.\"'t!..k ;'11
~'~~ff~:.,. \, '1\\olL'~ ~. ~ ~l:) > "Ii J:~i{ " \ \/iN ,I, ~"; FI' "'i
l;.~~l ,I }.1 . -il.6r;;l; '. if !)' ~^ 'J..;r........ ",~~: I
,:;!~~~ I \., ~lf,I:./(*I--~j .' " . '::.:.: ~ . ~il'~'I~\)~i:. H~
..,."l \. \ ". ;iJVl/~' ~~ ' ..r'\ I}. ~ . "'.1!r~"C1~~; ii1ll
~~ \ ,~"(jl~?f~/~ F~T;' \'''.~f' t'1~~~l~'V~\~~!11 i
l~'~ I' ::" ~~~;~L' (I,!u.~j';': "Ii-Ui .............~', I. '.' ,1
, f-~d:----/. ". '" ....j .
r I i;J J<.. .:~' ".. ~I , ,. I ..:'--. . . .... /-:
I 'II.: "'~~I;;:-' .;. i' '1.---,' ,'......... I"
~ I \\ :\~ ~~;il~\) ,,: . ~./':,; :;~ ~ 1 . ~.I I I
~ t'~I~' \ ;~\,);, ',' . Ii 'I /~)' ~f!Jj ~ 7
I I!\ i 'I/L~I . 1 ~%. / ~ ?!fl' r), y. N
I II:' ,t t'i' ;,r ~ / "I . ~ThI/11II ,,, y.1o' /. 6
I I . ',," -I '~::l\\\i 1\1 ~, - i ,I '. ' ~ ~ 10' 10 ~ Ol I
I.' III' I~P~\~\~" ',\,\~,' " . t:;t y'y. y.1f- ~~.~ ~ i Is
_ . I I in)))' '1It/" ..~.!'}j' ~~. If 10' ,t.<~, ~... ~
I I '~' I 1 111\.lll 'I/!J. : 1''\ 1 \ I' ~.~ .. *..r-, .!u ~ ~
I I ." ,:" \&: 11'1' . 'I~Z ,I I' ~lL:l l ~~/1<v.'''' ~ 1= II
I ,f':;~,m: }~' , I, ~l1J,\ .~ ~l~; ~~ I
f' ',j,r. Y4 I ~I,~ I \..y ~~ f,.~0';;: !Q
I 1"./ . V, I '!\. .y ~ .J if 1.1' " !li >
l~ fl" i:b:?i . ':'~" I W I ~'? -4 ;j>- j.~ ~ C
I I ,'/ " (\I(((I/~ ,~~.~ / ;."'" q '-.,., 5
,I . I . ,;!II(, I irfl./f I,. i ~I' 'lit- ' :z:
~I 11 . , ' II 'fi/,!(, r 77if!. 1 c': .. i( t;- '- 0
1 ~ l'ti./' ~ ~.J)M 1/' ~~I// J 11 ~~l ~
I 111 ,j" i,~,,, I} /1 "'.... L -r--JC, gj
: 'I i, / ': I ~I i'~ r;... 'Do~" 1'1,1 fll
. ~l : 1\ ill ',' ~: 1/ i /1" l ~ I I '----l
'I \c:' I' - , I~S )) I! -/..I~1f TN-~
~'1 ,v~ '; )I~,~" I ~-~~ !f1.f ~, ~
~.': 'll'';.JI~~~f<, ;~:j~,..:JJ~ ~~. ~m < I d~
,I Y!1/!' "J ..Jir!r , o(!.. / t?~~ OJ
:,. /. r ;'/jl 9~)" '" II(, n~il,' .t .
ri1i!-:J:2'1/ I 'jT/:, ~ \ - 7?' 11. 0$
1 , ~.,~J.:'lffir' '!;~ ~/1;, '.' . ~J~~ 1 ' . " ~J I
f'flNJ Wf:>/~ Ap, J";YPt~-. - , ' U
.' I'll I ~~//" . .. .,' ~ . ..'1 '
~
, ".. ~ '
,,:~ _,~~~ ~:~~#:, l ~/~' r %~..\"\ : -<I,
,,_' I, Ji . , ~,- '.~,. . . .' '-~. ";.".f " ~ z" ItI
.' . ~.." ~ 'I..... /I' g:.?, kl~~~,1 1
'''C ',":'" " ,."*,.,,,,',:',~;):"I:'1i',:~:d'
'., ,;i"l.i":.:".;.n\ld:,~.t':,' .,.. .~,
~"'il.",t+o-,(\~...~r,_-''''';;~'-o.'r.' T....~. -r,:'.:." ~ ' .... ,. -,. ~,
-# 3;
RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES
Rancho del Rey SPA III
SUBMITTAL DRAFT
August 10, 1990
Revised 10/26/90
12/18/90
3/4/91
Prepared for:
Rancho del Rey Partnership
2727 Hoover Avenue
National City, CA 92050
Prepared by:
Cinti & Associates
1133 Columbia street #201
San Diego, CA 92101
(619) 239-1815
3,...ft
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Paqe
INTRODUCTION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 1-1
Purpose
Organization
Project History
Relevant Planning Documents
Design Influences
Community Concept
DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS.................................... 11-1
Introduction and Summary
Master Developer Review Process
City of Chula Vista Design Review Process
COMMUNITY DESIGN GUIDELINES.............................. III-1
Introduction
Circulation
Grading
Entries
Fencing
Edges
Streets capes
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES........................... IV-1
Introduction
Architecture
Signing
Lighting
Parking
LANDSCAPE DESIGN......................................... V-1
Introduction
Landscape Concept
Landscape Zones
Slope Erosion Control
Natural Open Space Enhancement
Plant Materials by Zone
Fuel Modification Landscaping
Streets cape Landscaping
Landscape Standards
Irrigation Standards
Maintenance Standards
Landscape Design Criteria Checklist
(08/10/90)
i
~/- r 9
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(Continued)
Paqe
SITE PLANNING CRITERIA................................... VI-1
Product Development
Site Development Standards
Design Issues by Parcel
(08/10/90)
ii
3/- '0
I. INTRODUCTION
(08/10/90)
1-'
3/- CJ I
Purpose
This document is q manual to guide the design of site plans,
architecture, and landscape architecture within Sectional Plan-
ning Area III (SPA III) of the Rancho del Rey Planned
Community. It illustrates the master developer's philosophy and
commitment to a high quality, planned development program.
These guidelines address the design issues relevant to develop-
ment within SPA III. Separate manuals have been prepared for
areas within SPAs I and II. The applicable area is depicted
below.
SPA III
Design Guidelines
Area
(02/02/90)
1-2
3/-92-
This manual is being provided to ensure that the quality and
fundamental concepts established at the master planning stage
are maintained in the final phase of detailed planning and
design. This manual includes design concepts to guide specific
areas of consideration, but more importantly it establishes a
design context within which each element is important to the suc-
cess of the entire program. Just as the entire community can be
impacted by a substandard project, carefully crafted design
themes and standards can be compromised by inattention to one
element of the overall design program. The purpose of this
manual is to ensure that all development within Rancho del Rey
SPA III will maintain a high standard of design through
consistency with these published standards, which are in turn
consistent with those of the previous SPAs. All designers are
expected to refer to and implement the guidelines herein for
development projects within Rancho del Rey SPA III.
While it is the intention of the master developer to allow as
much freedom as possible for creative design expression at the
parcel and individual project levels, it is sometimes mandatory
to precisely control the design of areas critical to the success
of the overall community; locations where only a limited number
of solutions are acceptable.
Orqanization
This document is organized in six chapters. This introductory
chapter is intended to provide the necessary background informa-
tion needed to understand the project and the purpose of these
guidelines. The second chapter outlines the design review pro-
cesses of both the master developer and the City of Chula
Vista. The third chapter is devoted to community design issues
which were carefully considered during the SPA Plan process and
are now expected to be carried through in subsequent detailed
design. The fourth chapter addresses issues which are more gen-
eral and did not directly influence the SPA Plan design. The
fifth section addresses landscape design issues. The final chap-
ter includes some site planning criteria and provides a parcel-
by-parcel discussion of critical design issues and references
solutions.
Proiect History
SPA III is the final development phase within the amendment area
of the comprehensive update of the EI Rancho del Rey Specific
Plan in 1985. Earlier planning efforts for the overall project
include the Rancho Bonita Plan adopted in 1970 and a major
amendment to that plan in 1978 which created the first specific
plan for the area. The specific plan area includes the recently
developed Terra Nova area directly to the west of SPA I and that
along East "J" Street, east of Paseo Ranchero. These areas,
although constructed under previous SPA Plans, are important
because they have established design factors which must be cons i-
(02/02/90)
1-3
3/- 93
dered in the overall community design and theme. Current and
planned construction within SPAs I and II will establish numer-
ous precedents for the "community aesthetic" of Rancho del Rey.
The established standards and guidelines for these areas are
reflected in this SPA III document.
Relevant Planninq Documents
This Design Manual is the latest in a series of documents which
have, in increasing detail, established the development and
design standards for the Rancho del Rey Planned Community. The
most general standards are contained in the El Rancho del Rey
Specific Plan which is incorporated in the City's General Plan
for the property. The Specific Plan allocates land uses and
intensities throughout the planning area and establishes general
regulations and guidelines for development, as well as preserva-
tion and conservation of open space and other on-site resources.
The second level of planning is achieved through the plans pre-
pared for each of the three SPAs which comprise the then undevel-
oped portion of the specific plan area. SPA I was the first of
these areas to be planned and is now under construction. It
encompasses the majority of the property north of East "H"
Street. The remainder of that area, directly adjacent to Terra
Nova, has been planned as SPA II. The area to the south, be-
tween East "H" Street and Telegraph Canyon Road, is SPA III. It
is the final planning phase of the project and the subject of
these guidelines.
The SPA Plan and companion Planned Community (PC) District
Regulations expand upon the provisions of the Specific Plan and
provide more detailed design specifications and regulations.
The focus of the SPA Plan is the delineation of community level
facilities (e.g., collector roads, neighborhood parks, trail and
open space system, etc.) while also providing some site specific
information such as basic grading design, lotting and interior
street layouts. The PC Regulations provide the use and devel-
opment standards which are applied to individual lots. These
regulations should be reviewed during the design process for
height, bulk, and setback standards.
Desiqn Influences
The primary influences which affected the design of the SPA III
Plan were the adopted El Rancho del Rey Specific Plan, existing
improvements, and the landform characteristics of the site, as
depicted in Exhibit 1. The topography of the site consists pri-
marily of east-west trending ridges and intervening valleys.
The primary topographic feature of the SPA III site is the cen-
tral ridge which separates the southern leg of the Rice Canyon
Open Space Preserve and Telegraph Canyon. Rice Canyon contains
sensitive biological resources which are to be respected during
the development process. The development plan places develop-
(02/23/90)
1-4
31-'1
Ul
-
I
~~
~
'---l
('" ,
----
~
--
Design Influences
-
~ Connects 10 Proposed
Y SPA I Pedestrian lrail
o Proposed SPA 1 Employment Park
Side S1opes-retaln
as Open Space
Ridge Plateau
Development A,aa
View Opportunltias
Use major circulation
elaments to link
neighborhoods
J:::;J Q Scenic Highway
tit
~
~...
.... .-'.....,......:.
.....'::...:....
~
r-il
LSlJ
-
QUa"'.,. HIls
ElernlIfUrySctlool
-
Actlvny Node
I.
\-
~rnb
r..l
t.
\\
",
,
Pedestrian Unkages
,-"",0;;;:,
" o,;;:~:!'ot.
"
II '" --
I,' i-
y..J
Rice Canyon Open
Space Preserve
Adjacent Land Use
Water Tank
~
.R@Q!<;lQ~B1!
7123190[!]
n....n
em
&-
16191 2:l'. l'lS
I=vhlhlt 1
ment areas on higher elevations while maintaining the canyon in
natural open space with some recreational uses, as was done with
the northern and central legs of Rice Canyon in SPAs I and II.
As illustrated in Exhibit 1, Design Influences, the preserved
side slopes are intended to provide a natural open space back-
drop for development. Graded slope areas are to be planted with
naturalized species to also contribute to this effect. The
location of the development areas provides numerous view oppor-
tunities, but will also necessitate screening and other design
features to maintain a high aesthetic quality throughout the
community and as viewed from off-site. A primary design con-
sideration is the integration of development into the natural
setting while preserving the natural ambiance of the canyon
area. Another primary consideration is the integration of SPA
III with the existing development which adjoins most edges of
the project. Projects within SPA III will need to balance the
"Rancho del Rey aesthetic" with the existing designs and pat-
terns of development on adjacent property.
Community Concept
The Rancho del Rey Planned Community includes a diversity of
residential products, together with employment and support land
uses in a well planned arrangement, (see Exhibit 2, Site
Utilization Plan). The predominant residential product in the
overall project is the single family detached (SFD) home which
is sited on a variety of lot sizes. Within SPA III, SFD pro-
ducts are proposed in the western and central portions of the
site. A single townhouse site is designated at the southeastern
corner of the project, south of East "J" Street. The residen-
tial parcel at the northern edge, along East "H" Street, is
designated for Specialty Housing. This will most likely be a
retirement housing project which may include two or more product
types, attached and/or detached.
To the south of the Specialty Housing site is the southern leg
of Rice Canyon, designated for open space. The other major
on-site open space area is on the southern edge of the project,
an open space buffer along Telegraph Canyon Road. These areas
continue the pattern of using open space as both an amenity and
the setting for the Rancho del Rey Community which was establish-
ed by the Specific Plan and implemented in SPAs I and II. The
major proposed public use within the project is a junior high
school site located at the southeast corner oj Paseo Ranchero
and East "J" Street. A large neighbor hood park site is provid-
ed between the junior high school and townhouse residential
sites. A small community facility site is located along Paseo
Ladera, on the western edge of the project. The arrangement of
these public uses necessitates an amendment to the EI Rancho del
Rey Specific Plan which will be accomplished concurrent with SPA
Plan adoption.
The major circulation routes through the project are Paseo
Ranchero and East "J" Street. Paseo Ranchero and an off-street
(10/26/90)
1-6
3/- 'If,
~
~
a. -' rf' ~'._~'-= r
~~!\,:jr' ~ //'
Z ~,-".--,\:.,. .
~ \~;\,.> I
',,:.Y\',\'
\\~:~ \. ',' "\.
N ,,,~,,,.
/, -......
,
~
w
~
.' '
,.'
\\ . \
\\ ,,';,'-
I/~~
\'.
\
\
~.\
~. ..
"
t
" ~ . . . ~
- " .
" .
t
0 ~ - ~ 0 : ;
. .
~ " 0 . 0 0 .
" . " . . .
" . ~
o~1
5
EJ
.
i
,
trail system provide connections between SPA III and the major
public facilities located to the north in SPA I. The realign-
ment of East "J" Street so that it does not connect to Buena
Vista Way, east of Paseo Ranchero, also requires a General/
Specific Plan Amendment which has been incorporated with SPA
Plan approval.
(10/26/90)
1-8
31-'1Q
II. DESIGN REVIEW PROCESS
(08/10/90)
0-1
3/ - '19
Introduction and Snmm..ry
The design review process includes two integrated procedures:
design review and approval by the master developer and review
and approval by the City of Chula Vista. Essentially the pro-
cess requires the builder to formulate the design for his parcel
and review it with the master developer prior to formal applica-
tion and review of final designs by the City. The City of Chula
Vista requires Site Plan and Architectural Review, as well as
Landscape Review. The overall process is sketched below.
~~
DESIGN REVIEW
PROCESS CHART
~ fleJIlGi' .f
~'crTr
M:~
~I'E-VW
~.
~~trJlt
trNrt-.~
~
VF
~ e{rr~
~
. . .
(02/02/90)
1-2
3/- 100
Master Developer Review Process
The review requirements of the master developer are intended to
ensure that the builder's intended product and designs meet the
standards and criteria for the entire planned community. The
items to be included in the builder's design submittal package
are listed below.
Preliminary Architectural Plans
Schematic floor plans (1/4" scale min. with room dimensions)
Schematic unit elevations (1/4" scale min. - front, rear,
and exposed sides with color and material callouts)
Typical schematic street elevations (1/8" scale min.)
Color and materials sample board
Preliminary Site and Landscape Plans
Preliminary site plan with tabulation of units, parking, and
view analysis (1"=40' or 1"=20' scale, depending on parcel
size)
Conceptual grading plan with cross sections
Conceptual landscape plan with plant materials list and
sizes (1"=20' scale)
Cost estimates and references, as required
Following acceptance of the builders schematic design, a con-
tinuing exchange of information will be expected as the design
is finalized and the City's review process begins. Final, ap-
proved plans shall be provided to the master developer for his
records.
City of Chula Vista Desiqn Review Process
The requirements of the City are fairly typical but each builder
and/or his consultants should contact the City for current, spe-
cific requirements. The design review process with the Master
Developer should be complete prior to formal review by the City.
The standards and requirements for Site Plan and Architectural
Approval shall be as provided for in the Rancho del Rey Planned
Community District Regulations. Single family detached resident-
ial areas with lots 5,000 s.f. or larger in any residential dis-
trict may use the tentative tract map with typical building
elevations and typical building locations on lots as a substi-
tute for elevations and siting of all buildings. Specific re-
quirements for application and review procedures are published
in the City's Zoning Ordinance.
(02/23/90)
11-3
3/-/0/
The City has also published a "Landscape Manual" which describes
the landscape review process and provides some guidelines for
landscape design from the City's perspective. The Manual also
includes specific standards for landscape and irrigation improve-
ments.
(02/02/90)
1-4
3/ - 10 2..
III. COMMUNITY DESIGN GUIDELINES
(08/10/90)
11-1
31-/03
Introduction
The character of the Rancho del Rey Community at the broadest
level is established by the El Rancho del Rey Specific Plan and
SPA Plans. During the preparation of these plans, numerous com-
munity design features were established or considered. As indi-
vidual parcels are developed, attention to these established cri-
teria is necessary to successfully execute the intended design.
This section is intended to describe and promote the design fea-
tures of the SPA Plan and to provide guidance for consistent
detailed design. Several SPA Plan Exhibits which address these
design issues have been reproduced herein for reference. The
following chapter, General Development Guidelines, addresses
those design issues (e.g., architecture, lighting, parking,
etc.) which were not intregral to the previous plans.
Circulation
The circulation network provides both a physical and visual con-
nection between residential neighborhoods. The overall street
circulation plan is indicated in Exhibit 3 on the following
page. The exhibit also illustrates typical road sections. In
addition, a comprehensive system trails for pedestrian and
bicyclist use has been included throughout the community. The
SPA III trail system includes a hiking trail which extends the
length of the southern leg of the Rice Canyon OPen Space Pre-
serve and connects to a regional network through SPA I. Access
to the trail system will be site planning issue for some
parcels.
Special landscape designs and treatments have been established
for community entries, parcel entries and streetscapes. These
are discussed in the Landscape Design section of these Guide-
lines and should be referenced for further information.
(02/23/90)
W-2
~-/o1
I
'-
--
A P..eo Ranchero 'NorUI .1
'e'I.,ph Cln,o" R..d)
~~
" ,.
it , "i'
I B P..eo Renchero Clout.. of
E..I H en..d
~,
"
,J~'
j;J-lL~~=~
......._--;;.:;.-:...,_..........
".,."-._". h..
o e:.:~~n:,~::, ~'Ie~:::r
~'~'Lr ~
E Pa..o Ranchero CThI--"
Soulll Riel CIl't)lon)
'i:a
"j\ ", '11
~~'II:
".,.- __._0- ._...........-
._10-._....-.
F P...o Aenchero (Nor'''' ,,-
.,UI..lofIV.,cIe)
~
"I~ Jl
G Pa.eo Ranchero (lDul. 01
Ea'l J a.,..t)
~
It . ~i
H Ea.' J Sir..' (htl 01
P...oAane.....o)
.~
~.
I e..t J Str..t 18.'__ C...
01' A., end 8,1 A... RMtge)
E--!t~ ..__.......\
, ~-.l..-- ..
E--t=E./ _____- . )
-----y ./\ \ I\./' ':-.
'B"."~ .--/ 7.
Rldg. .
: 8utHtIvlelo, ~.... F F H;'
~ ..j \M~:~~O: 0 J;.,..e~\
.. I Sub~Iyj.lon D ,.,. .".,- ~ \
J V ~.,...... H \
A"~ " \\
L I r-- K 0
,..rv-_.J G
.
.
eu. H St,...
----.
---
-.---
--
'0'
~lc
....."'"'_.._._r_..
.........-.-....-.
J E... J Str..t e., ... Air
RIcl~ Ea" of P,... Lldora) .
~ J
.......-..-..
.'. 'r .--........ 0
1\. . II ;;;--'-'..':'
* ,'<- -. '7
K e"l J Sir;;'... .....Ion V'r'" ,
W"I 01""'0 R_hero) (.1 C...
0.1 R.,W." 01 P...o R.ncllero)
Jt:~_..
..1._._-_101......
L Pa.eo L,der, (Soutll
01 E..t J 8t"..)
.~~Q~Rey~
Circulation
Plan
C4lndlawoocl
Subdivision
ea., Del Rey
Subdl"llIlon
--\
.
.
.--.,
_.--' A
.--
"
.
.
NCJre ~ na i'IIICMI.......
.d........-.npqKt.
.0'
c."(\~
Prime Arterial
,..9'(\
~.\.9
---
ClBSS I Collect...
Clsss II Collect...
as.. I CoIecl...
m'l9O[!J
n...n
Ci1Ii
& ....-
1....m....5
Exhibit 3
Trails
The interconnecting trail system provided in SPA III is
graphically shown in Exhibit 4 on the following page.
Trails in open space areas such as the southern leg of Rice
Canyon are to be aligned and constructed to minimize adverse
impacts to sensitive biological resources. Trails should
follow utility access roads and existing paths whenever
feasible to minimize disturbance of natural vegetation.
The SPA III trail system will provide a connection between
the existing residential development west of the project
site and the school and park amenities at the northeastern
edge. Schools and parks, including the on-site junior high
school and neighborhood park are expected to be the primary
destinations of trail users and are indicated on the Trails
exhibit. In addition to pedestrian and hiking trails, a
bicycle trail (bike lane) connection is provided between the
existing bicycle routes on Telegraph Canyon Road and East
"R" Street. The SPA III trail system will connect to the
system within the Sunbow community, south of Telegraph
Canyon Road, via Paseo Ladera. These routes will encourage
non-vehicular circulation within the community. Final
location of the trail system is subject to review by the
City Parks and recreation Department.
A sketch on a following page illustrates the trail crossing
at Paseo Ranchero. The sketch also includes a section which
describes the grading adjacent to the roadway. At the can-
yon crossing, the streetscape will be comprised primarily of
views down and across either side of the canyon. Some of
the landscaping installed on the down slopes adjacent to the
roadway will also be visible.
Access from the SPA III neighborhood park to the trail
paralleling Telegraph Canyon Road will also be provided. A
sketch conceptually illustrating the access route is
provided. Recontouring of the slopes facing Buena Vista
Way, to improve the appearance and reduce maintenance of the
slope, are also illustrated.
(03/04/91 )
111-4
.31-/0 "
..
, .
~......~.!.t...~
.. ~I~S~~,,~:L.
,~~'t1.l1"'~~-';'>~',':.~ -..
\: \" .1.",\\ ."~t""''''iS..
.\ ,':~,~;I:\~t\'r:W\~'~l..~"'~.~"
' "~~';1t~V{{?,\\.~~:t,~~~..
"" ~"'\'<\' ,...,'~",'..,,:~,., -.
"'--<.,tW.\'.~:\~~~'1:i1 . ... .
~~'N.s:.\\~~~"i<\.\\:. .~.... .
. <o.l~tH~rr:;),:~~{~~~~~{ "
...~..::.:0~~~'.,
'~i~J
~oooocc..J Hiking Trail
B Pedestrian Trail
~......[ Existing Bicycle Trail
Proposed Bicycle Trail
Recreation /Open Space /Trails
....
...
.-! :
r;?- ..
v~ ....
1f' Connect. to P<opooed p'~~led ....~.~...
SPA I Hiking Trail --..~'tf5-:>v-
.._~~
, ~ ......~"V~ ! I \
. ."" M 8TMU ........... j I I
.........................................!~-~
Land Use
" ,
"
"
"
II
I,
l' \---
II "
)1 \.1\
.,.'" ~ "\ I ....
--; --' ~ ...
.,."'~"'1' \ *:,. .
t........... \ @ \ Rellldentlal .!.!-e .
\--- \ . '..'" ..
. " <\<;., .~~"'.f, '>; ..-
..':t!..<{'..trc .-
\ -1-~i\'..i'~
~~ !-< ..-
)\1': .- ,f-tF
".- r.'"
, ..
,..- ....-tf'
'-._ ........0
..
..
..
....
....
.....
.....
...
.. "'. ....::........-.....
.).. .................... -
.. I
.....
Residential
.'\~.A"'h,~\ 'I "'\.,'
'~r,.'I; ~i;:V., t~_~ t\ ~
,.C;'I<:',~....,h;.
;!k.;H',~4'~,bt;.,i
Open Space
147.6
@
Neighborhood Park
10.0
Total
157.6 ac
:
Community
Facllllles
/.
.
.~~Q~Rey~
7/23/90~
REV 3/4/D1
rt..J1
Ci1Il
&-
,,,"231.1'1$
Exhibit 4 :
(
d
PASEO RANCHERO
at RICE CANYON
~ fZb!~. ~
W65r eIOT
]M/t-
~;U7
WV~i/ffA/T
ffM
qwroA/71WL-
---
.........-........-------
....J
111-6
.3/-/og
-
.~
t=
c:
~
c:
~
o
..c
0-
~
0)
CD
-
~
- ~r
3{-&a/o9
~
~~I;
5
EJ
Gradinq
Attention to detail in the execution of grading is important at
both the mass grading and detail grading levels. The EI Rancho
del Rey Specific Plan included design standards for grading.
The most relevant portion is repeated below. The Alternative
Grading Concept (Exhibit 5) is responsive to these policies as
well as those of the General Plan Land Use Element. Final
design should reflect the approved conceptual design. The
requirements of the Chula Vista Grading Ordinance and other city
policies, which are not superseded by those herein, shall also
be incorporated in grading plans for development within the SPA.
Grading Standard
The design intention of the specific plan is that graded
areas be contoured to blend with natural landforms. Round-
ing both vertical and horizontal intersections of graded
planes, obscuring slope drainage structures by massing a
variety of plant materials, incorporating variable slope
ratios for larger slope banks, use of landscape planting to
control erosion and obscure man-made banks, architectural
solutions to topographic changes, and other similar tech-
niques should be used. Slope banks with rigid angular
characteristics shall not be permitted.
Slope Banks - General
The following guidelines are summarized from the SPA III
Plan. Specific standards will be implemented through the
tentative tract map process.
Slope banks should be constructed at 2:1 or less
(unless otherwise approved).
Erosion potential on all slopes should be reduced
through the use of small berms at the top of the slope,
drainage improvements, and/or the use of appropriate
vegetation (see Landscape Design).
Provision should be made for adequate maintenance of
graded slopes and landscaping.
Streetscape Slopes
The City's Street Design Standards Policy establishes stan-
dards for the grading of slopes adjacent to the right-of-way
of major streets. These generalized standards are applied
unless more precise designs are submitted and approved in
conjunction with the project planning process. Considerable
attention has been given to streetscape appearance in the
design of SPA III and generalized design concept is included
in this chapter (see Streetscapes). A more detailed evalua-
tion of landscaping and slope design, utilizing the design
criteria and concept presented in these Guidelines, shall
(03/04/91 )
111-7
31-110
occur with tentative subdivision map review. The approval
of the SPA Plan and Design Guidelines shall constitute a
more precise discretionary action by the Director of
Planning and the City Council with regard to landscaping and
slopes, superseding the general policy.
Re-grading of the area along Buena Vista Way, in the
vicinity of the planned East "J" street intersection, will
be completed to establish final slope conditions. Permanent
landscaping, irrigation, curb and gutter improvements will
also be constructed.
An Alternative Grading Concept prepared as a component of the
SPA III Plan will implement the grading design standards noted
above (see Exhibit 5). The tentative subdivision map shall also
be consistent with the grading standards herein and the
Alternative Grading Concept. Subsequent detailed planning is
not expected to involve major grading but rather focus on small
refinements on a parcel-by-parcel basis. The critical issues at
that level will be landscape treatments, erosion control, etc.
The Landscape Design section should be referenced for guidance.
(12/18/90)
111-8
8/-/11
ALTERNATIVE
GRADING CONCEPT
~
"
,
......
"
f'J
""""""'"
SLOPE!ll.Pro~_41
SlOF'ESOf FlAlTEll ",$U.l.ATf'
NAll.RALlN<<lf'ORM_EH-tANCf:
EAST 14' STREET YEWStED
~_J1.~*C:
-....., \..... '.-
~ '-:r" ,.>\......,..:.--' \ ,
/.aII .,/-:\1_ ~.~ -r;"f"."')' ~-.
,,"~4 ..".,i,....<... \\\,\.\-.,,1\-,
r'-~-' / '''-Ir~'.d'.- ~~~:.~ )/1, '.
,"'._ .,\ ,,- ----, II" :,.
.." l' "--"\ . ,'-- .
~-- ,. ,._-;_.\'.\. ') '~i,:~\"
-.' ~', ""..' .~:.~~:, '1
--1
It
-,
._'J
,-
-',
~~::-'::_-~-
<~:::,..r}'''''_7___
,-,
u,
AEDUCE!>2'ttGHCNfl'ON
FUSl..OPElOU..CAN'lON
_ 22' _ PlIlUC TAAL
CONlOlR SlOPES 10
IIlEN),,*,NATLflAl
""""""" ..... ....
~...~~
_ NA1t.IW.. aoPES
OEHT1YlHlI.I.m~EOOES'"
M.Eft)_NAJl,IW.lAHDf(lAMS
.. a..osElY .. f'OSS8L
"""""''''''''''
U!lE \Il.lWa.l GlWlEHt aOPE
ol2S;I...GAEATEA
"!_-------:".
~
~
, /-'
-
-r.-- "
--
.~QQ~~~
[IJr\)1
Ci1li
.-
15"123'. '&I~
Exhibit 5
~
'"
I ~
.....
.....
lJJ
ALTERNATIVE GRADING PLAN
SPECIALTY HOUSING EAST
~'--
RAISE EXISTING DEPRESSION to CREATE ~" ee~ (
LANDSCAPED BACKDROP and VISUAL ~""\""\" S\t. .
CONT1NUlTY along EAST "H" STREE~.,---- E.as\.;.:.....-- , \\
-----' ~ 1
"'-::::"' -.--'----- , 'I
CREATE INTERNAL ) } j
'CONTOURED TERRACING. L~
'Cr]
lfil 9
KU "" '" """ II i~,
and GENTLY CONTOUR ,/ cf',~/ r"~.
into NATURAL. / I I 1\
/ / (J
-'._to
'-.- - --'J...---r.=-
-L..-C::r_..>-/
PULL BACK INTERNAL CIRCULATION
to REDUCE CANYON FILL.
-<'"
'<:.:;,---
---
..
~
-",
REDUCE CANYON
FILL from 65' to IS',
/'
CREATE ACCESS to CANYON
FLOOR and GENTLY CONTOI
TRANSITIONAL SLOPES,
REDUCE CANYON SLOPE
FROM 90' to 26' in CANYON
and 25' above PUBLIC TRAIL.
r
.~QQ~B!Y
cr.i
..-
10/30/90 l~
~
......
I ..
U,
...... r:T
"
~
--~~
~! "If'Street
CREATE FI.U lENGTH
PUBLIC TRAIL along
CANYON RIM. USE 3: 1
CONTOURING to
TRANSITION to NATURAL.
ALTERNATIVE GRADING PLAN
SPECIALTY HOUSING WEST
RECONTOUR SLOPES UP TO RESERVOIl
with 4:1 SLOPES Of flATTER to 5IU.ATE
CONTOUR SLOPES
.
.
REOUCE 52' HIGH CANYON
FLl SLOPE TO 32' in CANYON
and 22' above PUBLIC TRAIL.
~
CONTOUR TRANSITION SLOPE
to NATURAL. CANYON SLOPE
REDUCED from 61' to 40'
in CANYON with 21' above
PUBLIC TRAIL.
.~QQ~~
en
.-
10/30/90 .....nt.,'"
ALTERNATIVE GRADING PLAN
TELEGRAPH CANYON ROAD
TRANSITION SLOPES from 2:1 or
FLATTER and RADIATE FILL SLOPES
10 EMULATE Ihe NATURAL SLOPES.
UJ =
T'
co
o
-
,
.......
U
GENTLY UNDUlATE PAD EDGES
10 BLEND wilh NAtuRAL LANDFORMS
as CLOSELY as POSSIBLE.
REMOVE EXISTING 2: 1 SLOPES
ADJACENT 10 TELEGRAPH CANYON ROAD
and RECONTOUR SLOPES 10 NATURAL.
..
-"
USE VARIABLE GRADIENT
SLOPE of 2.5: 1 or GREATER.
.~QQ~~
em
.-
10/30/90 "fltm..."
Entries
Entries serve two primary purposes. The first is informational;
they identify the community or neighborhood. To this end, entry
graphics must be clearly readable to the motorists and not so
overly sculpted and landscaped that their basic message becomes
obscured.
The second purpose is to provide unifying design accents through-
out the community. If each project or neighborhood attempted to
compete for attention via their entries, the overall unity of
the community would be decreased. Therefore, there will be a
common design treatment for all entries to reinforce the overall
sense of community.
Entry monumentation will be provided by both the master develop-
er and individual builders. There are three primary types of
entries: major entries, minor entries, and gated entries. The
approximate location of these entries is depicted on Exhibit 6,
Community Signage.
(02/02/90)
10-10
.a/-III-
Q)
@'
c:
.Q>
C/)
>a
~
E
~
o
()
i.n....)... ,_ O' ..; y::;' '.;,"~\~~\
.' _.-rr;- .'''1 "-
I (:.('\j-~ 'SiL' ",,-:,,: " '
.' \""(<"'~-::"""\. ''<C/ ~ '1<0 \. ~ '
\ . . ,'.:,) r.~ '.... .~~, ',,-
. ,)P!:~i i.~' ,--.':~~C' "\' ".
t+-'rr'''''' c?' -~ "-
\r~ .-.,' I 1'.' ,xffic" ., ~"
:,';:;Jl? ...,"-) . u-.~ ~.\ ~ . . '" .""
v"'L4 .v/"-':) '\ ,~ \ '*' f\
I .., . ;,.)~.,<:..."\. " . " I ,. \
, V~(\~..~~~t.F;'J.:;f" .:,,,\"~i, \
~~~~">;'(~~' \ \, \\\ \
.~~.".\\,_n" ,,)~,< \
. .,....r..~""''''''' .'1 If ,,,), >, \ .I~""":'
..~~__ _. ,;..>-....'-~~. ':'~, \ ._ \ 1--:;:-":::)"', --l_~' \
-.:"tW" ",,,'.- v\.,,-~
; ~~_ _' .~~~"",.:;1"~ \ \
''''j "\\'1\ ',. .'~ ,~.\. "
, " P ~ft7~;- \~\ .\.
I .'. '. 'iJf 'rJ._ .1.\ \
:.. [(0 ~.i:f~~;;\ \,," \
" \ ' '"" " '. ',.,' ", ,1\ ,'"
~~. . .~,:...., >,.UJC'i .\-I;'w.......,o<i 1:~ . '-""~' \ > \
, "/ f --..\,..:.-u'-~ '"It ,
. , ~,14":::'T'_r7>;:::!'!"" \
"" (\ ,,, .' '"t1/}.i' '
" " "",,';".''',' . '. \,ZJrs''',.''' \ \
".. "-,, ,-}I ,- .~/_,.::-. \...
I. ~;j\ ",,,-:. '",')1)' ". ~ 1,\
\\ <, ~,i:"'!~ (:'..' .... .~/(.'~~. \ ". \,\
1'1 ~.'.jl..il/;' ,- ~_'.~'-0',r'~%';' · \
,\ "".," , ~":Y",. . --'I
\\"'i~.....:t:..'lt~~ "I ,r--,/w,..:: .:-'S . ,J:,,,,-;e-' -\
,-~:, /<.O...'."i.' ."..... ' ,~,". .~ "l"~~.. '
" /4)t{.:., ..... i-.... "'~ _,.t. '/0":>' I
.J' '.....' ""- " .., I
=..._: :.. "....1 -~. "I
Jr"'.;; .'.'. t.... ~"" I
. ."."/' ."
___, ., '",j ~. . I
r' ',' i --, I
y----..J ____J, i
,"'~~'/ '
-' j }~(t\'<,
!/, /:~;.~ /
~ _)('I:III:{'
, .
./ /
Jk17~;
nlLI
\::( -'"
. y
~l':,,:,;',/
I . 7
/1' ,r
. ",\\\'.
II, "';j/
I L \.-..
I \
J
i,
\,
.,
",
\
;;
>
~
j j j
I ,. i
. j I
~ ~ ~
~0@]
~1- /lr
~
.
" ~
. ..
.. u
. .
u .
o ..
; .
D :;
o ..
.. .
" "
. .
. ~
o .
a. =
o D
. .
~ ..
.
~ .
. ..
o
. -
c .
au
;; .
~
c .
. c
E .
. ~
c 0
o
~ c
.
c
. ..
.. ~
0.':
Z .
1<<<:
O. ~ ~;g
.-
""~~
"
W
5
EJ
~
M
"'
~i
~&
~j
@t
aj
.
Major Entries
Major entries are those which provide access to the entire
community. They consist of special monumentation and land-
scape planting, as illustrated below.
These entries should be designed to create a portal and
convey a sense of arrival. They will inform the motorist
that this is the entrance to the Rancho del Rey Community.
They will include design features that are consistent with
community fencing materials and may include a mock guard
house element. Entry design should flow with the terrain
and appear to be an extension of adjacent land forms.
-----..---
---..-...---
Minor Entries
These are the entries to the individual parcels in Rancho
del Rey. They are to be designed as an enhanced extension
of the community fencing detail. These should be limited to
the one or two major entry points into a parcel and will
provide visitors with the project name identification. The
master developer will provide individual builders with proto-
typical details of these entry treatments to insure conti-
nuity.
(02/02/90)
"'-12
31--/1 V
Gate Guarded Entry
There is a single neighborhood, identified as Parcels R-7 on
the Site Utilization Plan, which may be developed as a gated
neighborhood, due to its specialized housing character.
Even though this will be an exclusive neighborhood, it is
intended that the entries will conform to the community-wide
entry theme, should the gate guarded concept be implemented.
GATE GUARDED ENTRY MONUMENT
Fencinq
One of the most dominant visual elements of a community is its
fencing. It is essential for this element to be aesthetically
pleasing and provide continuity in design to unify the various
architectural styles within individual neighborhoods into a
single community theme.
Fences and walls can serve many functions including security,
identity, enclosure, privacy, etc. However care must be exer-
cised in the design of fencing in order to avoid long, boring or
awkward sections of fencing. It is intended that the available
fencing types be combined to attract interest and provide
variety. Using a combination of open and solid styles, changing
angles and directions is encouraged. Long straight runs of a
single fence style is monotonous and inappropriate. Section
VI.3 of the SPA III Plan provides additional fencing design and
placement guidelines.
(08/10/90)
111-13
.3/-IIt;
Below are the elevations of the Rancho del Rey fencing program.
These are to be used for all fencing indicted on the Fencing
Plan, Exhibit 7, on the preceding page. Fencing for townhome and
multi-family projects are not specified on the fencing plan,
because the placement of such fences will be a design detail of
each individual site plan in these areas. However, any fencing
proposed in these attached residential neighborhoods shall use
the same fencing style as indicated for the single family detach-
ed areas. Pilasters with the spherical cap shown in the sketches
should be used occasionally for design continuity along long
fence runs and at fencing "end points" (e.g., all entries, and
where substantial changes in direction or elevation occur). A
flat cap (no sphere) shall be used at other pilaster locations.
Pilasters should be provided at each property line intersection
or at a maximum spacing of 50 feet.
.,'
SOUND W ALL(Noise)1
V" SOLID WALL
,
:~
"
CONCRETE IILOCK
W, STUCCO fN8H
CONeReTI IILOCK PLAITER
WI STUCCO ,..eH TYI'tCAL
~
1..__
CONCRne: kOOK
WI lTUCCO Ale"
l:-
-
: ~ LOW FENCE
~.~
OPEN-THEME
VIEW FENCE
L.OW WALL
WROUGHT -.oN 'IENCE
:~
"
SOLID FENCE
V" with PILASTERS
. '.
STUCCO '''.M
~bP*IIlII~
(02/02/90)
111-14
.31 -I !LO
c
ro
([
0)
c
"0
c
~
\
"-
'\ ,..~t'
.' /,..
!\ ::J. .
',x/.,
I
'-j
.1 *
!
OJ
~
~
E
~
~
I-
:!!
"0
en
OJ
~
~
E
~
~
l-
e
~
8
~
">
~
e
~
0.
J!!
;;
'" .
D ~
." -"
~~
.! '0
:g~
-;; ~
~ -
~ Ii
D 0
O~
- ~
0> 0>
e e
O"U
e e
~ ~
LLLL
[DIG
g-'fi-/2./
~~I
5
EJ~
!!!
~
Ii;;;
fJ:>
,w
, ~
~j
~~
~j
8i
a~
.
COORDINATING FENCE HEIGHTS
~ If 11t~
p:7 711ft)
tY 1ffJr;
lAW fi4i'{T fIfD
FEWce
'ff{Gl~~r
.su::r IJOJltY
~
~
111-16
3/-/22..
Edqes
The interfaces between uses, or "edges", are extremely important
in'creating an overall harmony in community design. Site plan-
ning and landscape design should not terminate at the boundary
of an individual parcel, but should make a design connection
with the adjacent use. Four common edge conditions are discus-
sed and sketched below as examples of how to appropriately
respond to typical situations.
Canyon Interface
A major feature of the Rancho del Rey community is the large
open space areas which surround the development areas.
These are primarily canyon and slope areas located at lower
elevations from the development parcels. A critical element
of the overall community design is the interface between
these open canyon areas and the developed ridges. Grading
in these areas should simulate natural contours, to the
extent practicable. The site plans and architectural design
for residential projects should take advantage of the view
opportunities into and across the canyons. Designs should
also avoid the "hard brown edge" described in the Easements
section. A logical progression from the urbanized and mani-
cured landscape of the developed areas to the open and
natural vegetation of the canyons will be provided (see also
"Landscape Design"). Appropriate barriers and/or buffers
should be incorporated at the edge of the neighborhood parks
and where necessary. The following sketches illustrate
these canyon interface concepts.
,,~ fIwtv ~-
--<
~
(10/26/90)
111-17
3/- /23
ALTERNATIVE SENSITIVE EDGE TREATMENTS
~ ~ rllt6
a/'l7lIJ(/(}tl~ 7W~
676/0/ /f01'1e6
~~7'JH
fft~
.'
11I-18
tl:J 7/f/5
/;vajV"IJ/Y'<7e. sr/.fGtG
s~H ~elv-r-::;
fttfP.~v~
~
/
.
I
.sl- /2. r
VIEW PRESERVATION
VIeW afCllllXfl- (iy'
UJT ~p;;.
,,~V~
~" HN
~C:;~
--
V~ OW'fC-
) ) >
.~
~
PARK INTERFACE
111-19
3/-/25
School/Park Interfaces
Although schools and parks are generally considered to be
compatible with residential uses, some level of conflict is
unavoidable and a buffer must be provided. Whenever pos-
sible the buffer should include a change in elevation, plac-
ing the residential units higher. A difference of only
three or four feet is a significant improvement. Dense
planting of the slope and fencing should also be provided to
create a physical and visual separation. If sufficient
slope height is provided, an open fence could be used to
allow views from the residential lots across the open park
area. These features should provide an aesthetically pleas-
ing perimeter to the school or park while minimizing the
intrusion of noise and distractions to the adjacent home
sites.
BOGlE Easement
A major SDG&E easement runs through the western portion of
the community. This corridor divides the R-8 development
parcels and presents both an opportunity and a constraint.
The opportunity arises from the open space characteristics
of the feature which also incorporates the trail network.
The constraint lies in the limitations on the type of land-
scaping that can occur consistent with SDG&E restrictions.
Nonetheless, a fundamental design concept is that the
easement interface should not become a hard brown edge;
landscaping on the adjacent parcels should be blended into
the easement area to create a soft edge. See the Landscape
Design section for addition information.
(08/10/90)
111-20
31-/-(,.
EASEMENT LANDSCAPING at STREETS
(iiF
~c:rrl/./$
~~
~
~
111-21
31-/~1-
Scenic Corridors
Two off-site scenic corridors will be affected by develop-
ment within SPA III. These are the Telegraph Canyon Road
and East "R" Street corridors. Views from these streets to
residential development areas will mainly comprise rear unit
elevations and rooflines, rear yard fencing, and some graded
slope areas. In such visible areas, attention will need to
be given to the aesthetics of the rear exposure, as well as
the front. Additional rear elevation detailing, variable
lot depths or rear yard setbacks, and special slope land-
scaping should be considered as potential design solutions.
The canyon interface discussion and the landscape design
section of these Guidelines should be referenced for addi-
tional guidance. Additional discussion of this issue is
included in the SPA III Plan in Section VI.7.
The detailed guidelines for Parcel R-7 include design
criteria for the special setback area along a portion of
East "R" Street which borders on that development parcel.
Special attention should also be given to the graded slope
at the corner of Paseo Ranchero and Telegraph Canyon Road.
This area, adjacent to the junior high school site, is
visible, both as a project entry and a component of the
Telegraph Canyon Road scenic corridor. Design efforts
should be directed toward achieving a rustic/natural
character while maintaining site area for the school. The
incorporation of boulders or other techniques to retain the
slope, or provide opportunities for special landscaping to
"naturalize" the slope appearance should be considered.
(12/18/90)
111-22
31-/~ V
streetscapes
As noted earlier, considerable attention has been devoted to the
design of the major road streets capes within SPA III. A wide
variety of visual experiences are evident in the sketch on the
following page. Along East "H" Street, large areas of natural
open space contrast with residential development areas within
Parcel R-7 and the Employment Park on the north side of the
street. Canyon views are available at the intersection with
Paseo del Rey. The 80 foot special landscape setback is also
noted. Areas where development area landscaping will transition
to natural landscaping are indicated. Where slopes are adjacent
to the roadway, in the eastern portion of Parcel R-7, variable
slope ratios are to be utilized and the height of the slopes
should be limited. Detailed sketches describing the East "H"
Street streetscape are included in the design criteria for
Parcel R-7 (see Chapter VI).
Natural open space is the primary streetscape where the project
adjoins Telegraph Canyon Road. A flood control channel (not a
part of this project) will be visible along the northern side of
the road.
Only minor slopes will
largest will be slopes
school and park sites.
these facilities.
be visible along East "J" Street. The
down from the road to the junior high
This will allow views over and into
Traveling along Paseo Ranchero, from north to south, undulating
slopes of limited height will be visible on either side of the
street. The view will open up as the road tends down and
crosses Rice Canyon. Views to either side down and across the
canyon will constitute an expansive streetscape. South of East
"J" Street higher landscaped slopes associated with the Ladera
Villas project and the junior high school site will frame long
range views across Telegraph Canyon to Otay Ranch. These slopes
are created because Paseo Ranchero must descend quickly from the
development area and East "J" Street to connect with Telegraph
Canyon Road.
The following graphics describe the intended streetscape
design. The landscape guidelines in Chapter V should also be
referenced for plant materials and landscape design criteria.
(03/04/91 )
111-23
31-/~9
....-.
ffi <( j II ! II
.
<( & -
~ j \t
5 li /t
1 ( I -
, I~ tll
I \1 'V -
..
lIt II.
~ i It 51 ~
j I ~
Ii .. ~
<:J
W , I ;;;
~di ~
W
a: ~
~
~l!ill
I ~>>r.;!I
.l!!!J
<l1! ~I
~!(
\ I i
-hI U
I~
L
t-~
~=
w~
L.- :- ---::---._~------::~ L~.... ~ __ ~~ifO
,~...""."""~"",,x"'."J'J,ujJ""-- --I' ~tr!l.....!f/' ""'WJ",,~_~.'fR'
_llld"""'''"':''PV- 'Vf 1'1'
.~ ". - ~ J,....IfJf>f/ ~~j C
~ t:;rre .' ~,=o :ffJ
~
-
I =
,;;;
bJ'"
"'"
~ Conwnunily
Theme Fencng
VarJable Slope
liansilion Area
..P"
Communly 1.
Monumeo'
LocallOfl
MQANCIIO DEL QEY
- .. ... . . A Pl,mned CClCY\munity by the Rancho Del Rey PartnershIp
STREETSCAPE
Paseo Ranchero
I
I
~
7B
PFO
I ---.
~'- Plan Detail
SPECIAlJY HOUSING
.-.-.A.. '7~ ..
Variable Slope
TrallSltion Area
dSltJ'?i;"'t/" i, .f/'
, ,"'" "40/'-01,jf}"'T/['%<;'i;n
1.f",.'o,_.r"",W.",,'-""''''-'"''''''"''~ .... """ .._" ih.. y, ..
"",,"'''.'','-'_.,
Ill<
Paseo Ranchero
r
SFD
i
SFD Commt.nly
Theme Feoc.-.g
(3Cinti
.~
'6'~'?19 '8'<'
~
/ /'-~ E
~~(
. -'Iv //~ .J
/, r 'Z"" r---
1/ '~,
'-.-/f SFD" "
) ./1#/ "-\ SFD
" L,/1 " '
~/j/ \~ ) ~ III
/ff ~ //-.-~~_ '___Jil
'/I)"'~ 11.~r=t-~~1
...' .' f-I- cd.tt1tWfl'/ I
i' / W?trr \ I
'.i ........../
". "K:'~ Plan Detail /)
Extra Setback Area
for Garages
Taking Access
along "J" Street .
/ Extra Setback Area
. SFD for Garages Taking
I~l~ . t . C"7~ =-"=
~~~=d1.__~l___ ~
QIr
j - I _ i I~
Il'~~1!9~RQ~~eYB!Y
STREETSCAPE
East "J" Street/
Paseo Ladera
'.
'- ". \\
'i. 0 ~VariatMe s;~WNHO~~~
{'. QI' " Transition Area
/ ~:;~ing ~a,-r
-
,
--
~~
0>
IV
.
PARK SITE
.k.1ig1
School Site
!
"-.Plan Detail
COlTVnunity
Theme Fencing
/
~
SFD
~ n.JLn~":
12/17/90
----
----
.
STREETSCAPE
SECTIONS
Paseo Ranchero
exist!ng
sectIOn
5.5'
Sidewalk
.8'
5:1
Slope
* 2:1
Slope SFD
(
98' ROW.
I
,
+-
* Slope varies along Paseo Ranchero
adjacent to Mission Verde SWdivision.
Refer to the "Premiminary Detailed
Graoll1g Plan" for precise sk>pes.
Section C-C
SFD
W
5:1 5.5'
Slope Sidewalk
2:1 I
Slope ,
-+
94' ROW.
5.5'
Sidewalk
2:1
Slope SFD
5.5'
5: 1 Slope
Section B-B
Specialty
Housing
2:1
Slope
5.5'
Sidewalk
Slope varies I
from '
5:1102:1 SFD
I
-+
98' ROW.
I
+-
Section A-A
U~l!g~Q~~eyB!!
3j'-;7/.33
ri~ r--i.f
..I W~ I~
Cinti
& A!s::ae;
~'9' 219 '8'~
5.5'
5: 1 Slope
60' R.Ow.
~
.~1!9heQ~~eY~
.3l~8 /.3 ~
STREETSCAPE
SECTIONS
====
SFD
60' R.OW.
2:1
Slope
Section E-E
Paseo Ladera
Jr. High
School Site
Section D-D
East "J" Street
r1" r--1!
.,1 Wot I~
anti
&~
'619' 239. '8'~
TELEGRAPH CANYON RuAD
Drainage Channell
wail System Interface
'" ..
- '"
I CD
ffl1CB ~
&<c: I
~Q)
~~
c: ~ Telegraph
j UJ Canyon Road
""
III
CIlj!::
CIl__
(1)'0
0<0
Open Space ::t. ~ Drainage Channel
Drainage Channel
1QhNOBIO DIlL m
rlJ1
Ci1li
.-
rntZll-""
(08/10/90)
IV. GENERAL DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES
IV-1
.3/-/3iD
Introduction
The design issues discussed in this section are those which were
not directly addressed in the SPA III Plan, beyond the esbablish-
ment of regulations. Design solutions in these areas will be
much more the product of the creativity of each parcel's desig-
ner rather than conformance to the pre-established community
standard. The design review process of the master developer and
the City of Chula Vista will be used on a parcel-by-parcel basis
to evaluate and approve the design programs of individual
builders. Chapter VI of the SPA III Plan should be referenced
for an overview of general development issues.
Architecture
While the landscaping, fencing, and signing will have a common
design throughout the entire community, a variety of architect-
ural styles are envisioned for structures within the community.
Although various architectural styles are intended to coexist in
the overall community, they should not be mixed within a single
project. Each parcel on the Site Utilization Plan shall have
internal consistency. And, of particular importance, archi-
tecture should not be a hybrid style, such as "Spanish Cape
Cod".
THIS
(JO
(02/02/90)
NOT THIS
fffll;&:~ ~m;CT{}trt-
IV-2
3t-13=;-
THIS NOT THIS
]/[
'.
f)t7
~~riv;w-
5,;rJ:$
..
m
..
.
00 V~Y GU3l/A71,?/f$
. .
o
;AfPIf) ~~ ~
. .
. '.
. .."
t1PAlT tlse. ~ jPI~
~ ~ ~~c.-7IdIY
~-G FI/I/5I1t!!!i(/ I"'~P(/c-r.
.
fa
f4
O,?/vT hGT Et6~/Vs
~11e. 11t7(Vt7TC'/YO()S;
IV-3
3/- /3 ~
THIS
o
DO
a; j'rUGfY WI/IIOOU/5
f}tJ /t:rJ ~ ;.
~ et-tM/'r~
. .
NOT THIS
o
~~~
!~'cep W/lVWW5
~ j/
m 0
ill l~jp. OJ
1ft
c:::- o
I?PIf'T
00 ~~ NC(1/7l3CTlI1Y'rt- [JI/I'T
~::::---#~ S7J'~ IY-4
$/-/3'
Siqning
In the SPA Plan, the distinction is made between permanent and
temporary signs. Some aspects of permanent community signing
have been previously discussed under "Entries" in this manual.
The illustrations below provide some common sense guidance in
the design of temporary signs. Within the SPA III Plan, Chapter
XI - Comprehensive Sign Regulations should be consulted for
specific sign restrictions (e.g., sizes, permit requirements,
prohibitions, etc.).
THIS
a/lSl9!PVr ~~
a~/'rIT ~
~
f-'
+
~/~N~7!a ~
NOT THIS
~spWT 5~
~~
1C
/MPf'".-.o!tl-Q"\7lS- ~
IV-S
31-/~()
Liqhtinq
The design issue of "lighting" includes street lighting, as well
as, building and landscape accent lighting, and sign illumina-
tion. Three basic principals should be considered in the pro-
vision of lighting:
street lights should provide a safe and desirable level of
illumination for both motorists and pedestrians without
intruding into residential areas.
Lighting fixtures should relate to the human scale
especially in pedestrian areas.
Lighting and lighting fixtures should complement the design
and character of the environment in which they are placed.
All street lighting shall conform to City standards or an
approved theme lighting program, and shall be approved by the
City Engineer.
Lighting for community facilities and recreation areas shall be
considered as an element of Site Plan Review. Any such lighting
which will illuminate a residential area past the hour of 10:00
p.m. shall be clearly identified on the site plan per the
provisions of the SPA ill Plan (see Chapter VI).
Illuminated entries should direct lighting low to the ground and
be limited to only the immediate vicinity of the entry. Lig~ted
entries should not be distracting, create visual hot spots, or
glare etc. Suggested entry sign illumination techniques are
illustrated below.
j$~11
~
$l/~
~tl4W"'
/J.U'tIf/,I'ffll'IV
(02/02/90)
IV-6
31 -/~ I
~
. .........,
t~
r/~Ke.
STREET LIGHTING FIXTURE
IV-7
31 - / l/ 2.
Parkinq
The amount of parking required within each residential district
is specified in the Rancho del Rey Planned Community District
Regulations (see chart in Product Development section of these
Guidelines). Basic guidelines for the design of parking areas
are provided in Section VI.6 of the SPA III Plan. Additional
zoning requirements for sizing and spacing are published in the
Chula Visa Zoning Ordinance.
Sinqle FaJrlly
In single family districts, supplemental parking (beyond
that provided in garages) will be provided either by drive-
way spaces (between back of sidewalk and garage face) or
on-street parking. No special design criteria are required
for these areas. Required dimensions for these parking
spaces are provided in the SPA III PC District Regulations,
Chapter XII.
Multi-Family
Beyond providing the number of spaces required, the design
of common parking areas for attached and multi-family
neighborhoods is an important element in site planning.
Following are a series of illustrations to guide the design
of these parking areas, with particular attention to open
parking details.
ENHANCE PAVING at ENTRIES
~~
USE of BARRIER to SCREEN PARKING
-- ~ Wr""19
tV , r-;r
H~ ~
~6~
jr IV~-{ -f'
o
(08/10/90)
VISlI'V-
~-/~W""'I
1I'P/4( sJriW!i ""...
IV-a
3/-11/3
~ /~"'.~ W8lS
~ ~ if1'1 ~ qw-t"t?6
",.. ~fl JJ:{:ZL iU-
V77W~.h. ~ VI' ~
~~ ~'f 1'/'VYc.f,N6 t.-P~
IJ. .,SfS'
t. , I
I/YWtIe
gF
BREAK-UP of INTERIOR PARKING AREAS
PARKING PLANTERS
IV-9
31 - l'f~
LANDSCAPE SCREENING
o
IV -'r\ p.oe.. ~
IV-l0
~/-1"I.5
V. LANDSCAPE DESIGN
(08/10/90)
V-l
.3/-1'1 b
Introduction
The purpose of the landscape component is to visually reinforce
the patterns established by the Land Use Plan, and communicate
the overall landscape concept of the Rancho Del Rey community.
Since various groups will be responsible for the provision of
landscape improvements, this chapter will serve as a guide to
assure that the individual projects will be compatible within
the comprehensive landscape plan for the overall community.
Trees will be the dominant thematic element used to create a
logical sense of order, continuity and contrast throughout the
community. Trees will be pre-selected to provide the necessary
guidance to the various parties responsible for implementing and
administering the landscape program.
Trees and other plant materials will be selected from a suggest-
ed list of approved materials which is to be coordinated and
approved by the City Landscape Architect. The Plant Material
Matrix found later in this chapter includes all recommended
landscape materials for the SPA III project. The selected
materials reflect the sensitivity of the landscape concept to
the need to conserve water. In addition to the plant material
selections and other guidelines included herein, a landscape
water management and monitoring program will be prepared and
implemented for water conservation.
(02/02/90)
V-2
31 -/Yr
Landscape Concept
The general components of the landscape concept are as follows:
Parcel or Specific District (theme trees)
Each neighborhood may have a distinctive architectural
theme. Selected landscape elements, including trees, should
reflect that theme.
Streets (dominant, support street trees)
Landscaping of streets ~ill provide continuity throughout
the community and create the appropriate link with adjacent
areas. East "H" Street, East "J" Street, Telegraph Canyon
Road and Paseo Ranchero will continue existing tree patterns
established by the City of Chula Vista. Streets within indi-
vidual neighborhoods will reflect the neighborhood design
character.
Special materials within a landscape buffer will be
installed in masses with earthen berms along East "H" Street
to reinforce the established streetscape pattern within the
Employment Park across the street. Special attention will
also be paid to the graded area near the water tank.
Landmarks (theme trees)
Each major
character.
sites.
and minor landmark may have its own distinct
Landmarks in SPA III include the school and park
Entries (accent trees)
Entries are in three categories (see Entries in Chapter 4,
herein) :
Major Entry (community entry)
Minor Entry (neighborhood entry)
Gated Entry (special entry)
Accent trees will be used to contrast with designated street
trees. Major entry accent trees will be pre-selected; how-
ever, the minor and gate guarded entry trees will be selec-
ted by the builder subject to approval by Master Developer
and the City of Chula Vista.
Arterial Accent Planting
Flowering accent tress will be used at these major and minor
focal points to provide distinctive contrast.
(12/18/90)
V-3
1;/-/'13
Landscape Zones
Landscaping within Rancho Del Rey SPA III has been planned to
create a well balanced landscape statement. Landscape zones
have been identified so that this balance may be established and
maintained as the community matures. Landscape zones are dis-
tinguished by their water and maintenance requirements. These
zones are as follows:
Manicured and Ornamental Landscape
Manicured landscape is characterized as areas of high visual
impact requiring the greatest amount of care and water.
Community and neighborhood entries, and accent planting
areas fall within this category. These areas are kept to a
minimum to conserve water and energy.
Ornamental landscape requires routine maintenance and water;
however, of a less intensive degree. Limited lawn and
groundcover/shrub beds are in this zone, however seasonal
flower color or plants of a highly sensitive nature are not
included here. This is intended for parkways, parks,
schools and other areas where a good foundation of ornamen-
tal planting is required. Enhanced slopes will also include
this type of landscaping.
Drought Tolerant/Naturalized Landscape
This zone is used in low intensity use areas, and where a
natural appearance is more appropriate. Trees, shrubs and
groundcover in this area will require much less maintenance
and water. In many areas, the landscape will be allowed to
naturalize. This zone includes planting at transitions into
native areas. It will also include fire retardant landscape
and major slope areas.
Fire Retardant Landscape
Landscape zones between Native/Naturalized landscape
(seasonally dry vegetation areas) and improved properties
shall utilize fire retardant and low fuel plant materials.
This will help protect the properties in the event of brush
fire. The location and extent of this zone will be deter-
mined in conjunction with the approval of parcel-level
landscape plans.
Native Landscape (Pristine Native Community)
The native landscape zone (natural open space) is an area
where existing vegetation will remain with little modifica-
tion. This zone generally includes native canyons and
slopes.
(12/18/90)
V-4
.3/- 14/'7
~<?
=-~ ~~~
,,-""i;.~b.. ~~~\
~~ ..!!!::~~ D
'---. '~~ ~~ .~. !l1
~ ___ ~;;~ _ "';".'1 H 8"a.1 ,...., ~:=:!
~'___ -_--------~_rl.. 'f
.... ~~, ~~......-~,. "..,,~-r.~~~ / / If' ,
-"J ~ .<:::...,"'.....""~"- "". ....,~ fCA C!" / "'''" ' ...;;;:-,;;......?\
-.............. ~ . / / I .-~~--. d~ \
--__ ~..'V'--/ './ ,,\""/J !
-'--'______y..~, '" l(~ C//\ '-~Ii \_l
~~~:,~~::'::.~^::.::;::'::.. :' \ \"--\\,~. ..... ...... \ II \ '-
.hllllltln4 with IdOl pl.nllngl l- \ .'1':1:,. ~ ~ '
and r,lnforclch.rIClllf and . ~.... , ,. ':-'~" .....:.::"(\
'n.. ,..."..... ..... ... . '.?" . .'/"'-"""
tJ;.;' \] .P .. \..., .' r... .... };~ltt . 'i~/
"ATlRAL OPEN SPACE .! .~: tFfI.::~..J ~ ' ' ,::~::.~:/"';:>.j ."
r!,~._J-- \~\~, .~~~.~/y
, ".---- ,
, \\:f:' . /
f:!-. .:.. .. /
/' "'1 .____ .____ .----.- ~.......;
I .0\ ( ..~......
\ . ".....01";
(. ___-L-J,:=:;.:':-;;'OO
Uv
-
<
u.
,
.....
~~~............
...............
...............
rn.
"'dI
............. .....
.....................
.....................
.....................
.... ....... ....
C::2
PARK Pt..ANTINO
HIglrilr.nclllng............1&tlll
R~.If_.plIo"'edln
_.... and orin. 10 pro.,loe
.-oe, .....lIlIo.IIIO.,I....1
.c:c....T..III...dgr_dcov...
10pro.,1cIe ..,_'.c:..
ARTERIAL ACCENT Pt.ANTINO
FIo..rlngl,... and .ccen' .....uD.
ot groundc:O...... an ....tr, poIn'.
ENHANCED 8LOf>E PLANTING
V...Ilc:a1 ......._ Ir..' In random
p.n.rn, .I'"IIo....InlI.....uba and
apr..llllnegroundcO".....
NATURALIZED PLANTING
N.II". ..-cIna,...IIl.d ."...gr..n
lIhrub. 10 1I6encl1ll,truDed .,... ot
~..llbnal...loP8l'Iapac..
FLEL MODIFICATION ZONE
AC:IU.lloc:.llon 10b.d.l.rmln.d
'allowing plolllngol building.
.,.p.r' 01 III. plec:i.. pl.n
'lIbmiU,I. PI.n,......I.I. .11,11
c:on.let 01 10.-111.1 .hrllb. .nd
Qfoundco""',
o
o
---
---
~
&
ARTERIAL PLANTING
PI.n, m.tarl.I.lnconllnull,
.llh ,>lI.lIng III.m. .nd Cll,
L.nd.c.p. Arc:III'.cl', .t.nd.rd..
EAST oW 8TREET BUFFER
Lo. ..ergr.,n .Mllb. In III..... In
C:oMln.llon .1111 ..,," b.rm.. Pt.nl
met.rl.l. In c:ontlnull, .1111 SPA I
Employmenl P..... .C:leen1n8 10
..Intotc. ..I.llngl"''''''.
RESERVOIR SCREENING
F."....bol....I.Ung....gr..n
I.... .nd 10. ,,,"gr..n 'MilO' In
m..... 10 .c:r..n ..1.. ......'IoIr.
.~<;lQ~ReyB11
General Landscape Plan
7123190~
rt.J1
Cinli
& ........
(llUt)2U.18'S
Exhibit 8
Sensitive Plant Species Preservation
The SPA III project includes a mitigation program to offset
impacts to sensitive plant species which are found on the
undeveloped site. Impacts to populations of San Diego
barrel cactus and snake cholla are to be mitigated through a
transplantation program. Cacti from impacted areas are to
be relocated to permanent natural open space areas. This
work shall be conducted under the supervision of qualified
experts. A monitoring program will also be implemented to
gage the success of the transplant program.
The General Landscape Plan, Exhibit 8, illustrates the general
location of each element described above. Each individual
parcel should also be studied as detailed planning progresses.
It can be assumed however, that these areas will generally
consist of a balance of lush, ornamental and drought tolerant/
naturalized zones. Refer to Plant Materials Matrix for examples
of approved plants. Additionally, a landscape water management
and monitoring program will be implemented for water conserva-
tion.
(02/02/90)
V-6
31-/~1
Slope Erosion Control
All slope erosion control planting shall conform to the require-
ments of the "City of Chula Vista Landscape Manual" and the
City Landscape Architect.
The general intent of the slope erosion control program is to
protect newly created slopes or denuded areas from erosion or
unsightliness. Dust abatement is also a concern.
All areas of the site on which new grades have been created or
vegetation has been disturbed will be planted. One of two types
of planting will be required.
Type I plantings are those which require ongoing irrigation to
supplement natural rainfall. Generally, all areas adjacent to
street right-of-ways will be Type I plantings. The City
Landscape Architect may designate any other areas as Type 1 to
maintain the aesthetic quality of the community. Fire resistant
strips which are necessary between structures and natural open
space will be included in Type I planting.
Type II plantings are defined as areas which, once
will survive and grow with only natural rainfall.
Type II planting could be hydro-seeded with native
which is then irrigated until established.
established,
For example,
vegetation
(12/18/90)
V-7
.J I-/~ ~
TYPICAL PERMANENT SLOPE LANDSCAPING
~ ..s'#UU' f!e;.
~.
~
~1!6 Sfll#f
~~
~p;JYeS.
SECTION
f!!{F:f
efl-~
f#"fn~
~()e €ftIl.U/!!G ~ -
tI,q~~l'e~PV<-
. ~/~~~
.
-
-
PLAN VIEW
v-a
~'''15.3
Natural ~ Space Enhancement
The Rancho Del Rey SPA III Plan provides for the preservation
and enhancement of significant areas of open space. The major
areas are the southern leg of Rice Canyons, buffer along
Telegraph Canyon Road, and the SDG&E Easement. These areas
provide several unique opportunities:
_ Preservation of unique natural resources and wildlife
habitats.
Nature Study experience.
- Drainage basins for runoff.
- Less pollution, more oxygen in the atmosphere.
- View corridors.
Uses
The following are appropriate uses within the Open Space
areas:
Rice Canyon
Sensitive plant and wildlife habitat preservation
Nature study
Trail systems
SDG&E Easement
Improved park & recreation facilities
Parking
T,rail systems
Picnic areas
Nature study
Other day use activities
Teleqraph Canyon Open Space Buffer
Sensitive plant and wildlife habitat preservation
(02/02/90)
V-9
3/- /5 'I
Landscaping
The general intent of the landscaping program will be to
preserve and enhance the natural character while providing
fire protection zones between native areas and structures.
Transition zones will also be created to provide visual
blending with adjacent areas.
Landscape Zones
The canyon and SDG&E Easement areas consist of various
landscape zones to create the appropriate relationship
between man-made areas and natural habitats. These
areas are as follows:
Fuel Modification Zone
This zone exists between all structures and the
native vegetation of the canyon. Prototypically,
it may consist of the rear yard ornamental plant-
ing, brush clearance/thinning, and fire retardant
planting to create a 40 foot wide setback from
native planting. Fire retardant plant materials
and irrigation systems shall be utilized.
Naturalized Zone
This zone exists in disturbed areas (not included
in the fuel modification zone or other designated
zones). The purpose of this zone is to provide
landscaping and maintenance of disturbed areas.
Once established, this area shall be allowed to
naturalize.
Sensitive Plant Zone
This zone has been identified by the biologist as
a significant native plant community which is
sensitive to the impact of development or is a
site for the transplantation of sensitive plant
species. An effort has been made to route trails
away from these zones.
Native Zone
This zone consists of native (existing) plant
materials that are not disturbed by construction
activities or cleared for fire retardant
purposes. Native trees may be introduced to
enhance the trail system and define use areas.
Irrigation is provided by natural rainfall only.
Periodic cleanup and clearing of seasonal growth
in limited areas may be required.
(12/18/90)
V-l0
gl-ISS
SDG&E Easement
Landscaping within the SDG&E Easement shall con-
form to agency restrictions. The actual zones may'
vary among fuel modification, naturalized, native
and ornamental areas, based on the adjacent areas.
(12/18/90)
V-ll
3/-/5feJ
Plant Materials ~ Zone
(suggested)
Fuel Modification Zones
Trees, Shrubs
Callistemon (Bottlebrush)
Heteromeles arbutifolia (Toyon)
Nerium oleander - dwarf varieties (Oleander)
Perennials, Vines
Artemisia - low growing types (California Sagebrush)
Baccaris pilularis (Prostrate Coyote Bush)
Ice Plant - various types (no Carpotrotus edulis)
Myoporum parvifolium (Myoporum)
Trifolium fragiferum - O'Connor's varieties
(O'Connor's Legume)
Vinca species (Periwinkle)
Naturalized Zones
Artemisia (California Sagebrush)
Cistus crispus (Rockrose)
Eriophyllum species (Yarrow)
Eschscholzia californica (California Poppy)
Heteromeles arbutifolia (Toyon)
Mimulus species (Monkey Flower)
Penstemon species (penstemon)
Rhus - Evergreen types
Schinus molle (California Pepper)
Trichostema lanatum (Woolly Blue Curls)
Zauschneria species (California Fuchsia)
Native Zones - Introduction of Trees
Platanus racemosa (California Sycamore)
Populus fremonti (Poplar)
Quercus agrifolia (Coast Live Oak)
Ornamental Zones
.See Plant Matrix (General Landscape Plan)
(12/18/90)
V-12
3/-/59-
PLAJI'r MATERIALS MAnIX
KEY: MAN a Manicured
ORN a Ornamental
DTN a Drought TOlerant/Naturalized
FM = Fuel Modification
NAT = Native
~ ORN DTN FM NAT
TREES
Albizzia julibrissin *
Arecastrum romanzoffianum * *
Bauhinia variegata * *
Brachychiton acerifolia *
Cupaniopsis anacardiodies * *
Erythrina coralloidies *
Eucalyptus species * *
Ficus rubiqinosa *
Jacaranda acutifolia *
Koelreuteria bipinnata * *
Leptospermum laevigatum *
Liquidambar styraciflua *
Magnolia grandiflora *
Melaleuca leucadendra *
Pinus canariensis * * *
pinus species * * .
Platanus acerifolia/racemosa * .
Populus species * *
prunus cerasifera * .
pyrus bradfordii * .
Pyrus kawakamii * *
Quercus agrifolia *
Schinus molle .
SHRUBS
Acacia redo lens .
Agapanthus africanus . *
Arcotostaphylos species * .
Artemisia (low growing) * .
Buxus sempevirens * *
Callistemon citrinus . *
Camellia species .
Ceanothus species . . .
Cistus species *
Coprosma kirkii * *
cotoneaster species * *
Dodonaea viscosa *
Elaeagnus * *
Escallonia * * .
Eugenia uniflora * *
Feijoa sellowiana .
Hemerocallis hybrids .
Hetermoles arbutifolia * .
Hibiscus rosa-sinensis *
Juniperus species . *
Lantana sellowiana * .
(10/26/90)
V-13
~/"ISg
PlaD~ Ma~erial. Ma~rix (coD~'d)
KEY: MAN - Manicured
ORN - Ornamen~al
DTN - Drought Tolerant/Naturalized
FM - Fuel Modification
NAT - Native
MAN ORN DTN n1 NAT
SHRUBS (cont'd)
Moraea bicolor . .
Nandina domestica .
Nerium oleander . . .
Photina species . .
Pittosporum tobira .
Plumbago auriculata .
Podocarpus species . .
Pyracantha species .
Raphiolepis indica .
Rhamnus alaternus . . .
Rhus integrifolia . . .
Rosmarinus officinalis . . .
Tecoma capensis .
Viburnum species .
Xylosma senticosa . .
VINES
Bougainvillea species .
Cissus antarctica .
Ficus repens . .
Hibbertia scandens .
Parthenocissus tricuspidata .
Trachelospermum jasminoides .
wisteria .
GROUND COVERS
Arctotheca calendula . .
Asparagus sprengeri . .
Baccharis pilularis "Twin Peaks" . . . .
Cerastium tomentosum .
Fragaria chiloensis .
Gazania species . . . .
Hedera helix .
Myoporum parvifolium .
Ophiopogon japonicum . .
Pelargonium peltatum . .
Potent ilIa verna .
Rosmarinus officinalis "Prostrata" . .
Santolina virens .
Verbena hybrids .
Vinca major and minor .
NOTE: This is a recommended list for selection of plant materials; other
materials may be used subject to approval.
(10/26/90)
V-14
3/-/5'1
~ Modification Landscapinq
A fuel modification zone must be established between natural
open spaces and building development. This zone will consist of
an area cleared of natural brush and modified by the addition of
fire retardant materials (see list under "Natural Open Space
Enhancement"), and an automatic irrigation system. The minimum
width of this zone shall be established by the City of Chula
Vista Fire Marshal. Plants should vary in height and be planted
in random patterns to avoid a hard edge appearance.
~l;!!tJj/~)
~ f"~ ~S
lJ'J ~
. ~
W~\,.
FUEL MODIFICATION ZONE
(10/26/90)
V-IS
31-/tpO
streets cape Landscapinq
The streetscape, or street scene, is comprised of the buildings,
structures, street scale, adj~cent view/vistas, signage, land-
scaping and street furnishings. Building massing, articulation
of structures, setbacks and the arrangements of street furnish-
ings are discussed in other sections of these guidelines.
The following sketches illustrate important landscape treatments
of the streetscape.
(02/02/90)
V.16
31-/~1
TYPICAL STREET TREE PATTERNS
f)1)1f/tf1l[J~)
SINGLE F AMIL Y RESIDENTIAL
~ ~~9 PVe:.f. ~ c."tVRe~1'I
V-17
31-/~;;>
LANDSCAPED PARKWAYS
PARKWAY with MEANDERING WALK
(Meandering Walk along Artf3rials in selected locations)
(
-
<
PARKWAY with MONOLITHIC WALK
V-18
3/-1~3
LANDSCAPED P ARKW A YS
t~.
~+'~
f), ~~ {
I' ,,.
tp'&
PARKWAY with TRAFFIC GUARD
V-19
31-lfI~
MEANDERING SIDEWALKS
~""~~A ~
l'
~~
I!t!t!!:~ ill,","
6/lfF/C(#i;IIT fCRIf ~
~
~
V-20
,AWltJ !-EI'eTIV.s
f'Lr77F#WG WIv 7T4'fT
~1'I~,..v6 ~
~
':J~ 7~f,.~wcrtY
MT~
(;;J,i~~~~"~
. . ...
. '" 4: .
~r~c~
a~- ...._60 ,I,r
~- ~
.E I - /(",5
Landscape Standards
All landscape installation shall conform to the City of Chula
Vista Landscape Manual.
streetscape and common area landscape shall be planted to the
following minimum standards:
Ground covers shall be used to cover the entire
planting area (flatted material at the appropriate
spacing or hydroseed with City and Master Developer
approval) .
Spreading shrubs shall be used to eventually cover a
minimum of fifty (50%) percent of the area at mature
growth. Shrub and ground covers shall be selected from
the Plant Material Matrix.
Tree plantings shall consist of the designated
dominant, accent, and parcel trees.
A minimum of four (4) trees per 100 linear feet of
street frontage will be required. Spacing shall be 40
foot maximum. All trees will be staked in accordance
with the City Standard detail. Type, size, location,
and installation of trees in the City right-of-way
require City approval.
'II f~, ~-
f7J(/1'-- ~ 11/;fJ/;o/rJ;f/.
(02/02/90)
V-21
~'-I""
Irriqation Standards
All irrigation systems shall conform to the City of
Chula Vista Landscape Manual.
Irrigation systems shall be designed so that separate
areas of maintenance responsibility (i.e., private
association vs. Open Space Maintenance District) are
metered and controlled independently.
Open Space Maintenance District irrigation shall be
coordinated with the City of Chula Vista Open Space
Coordinator (Parks & Recreation Dept.). Systems in
these areas must conform to standard equipment and
installation techniques.
Equipment shall be located and installed to minimize
negative visual impact. Low precipitation sprinkler
heads should be utilized for optimum coverage and
maximum water conservation.
All Open Space Maintenance Areas shall be fully irri-
gated with an automatic irrigation system, as required
by the City Landscape Architect and/or Parks and
Recreation Department Landscape Architect.
Maintenance Standards
All landscape maintenance shall conform to the City of Chula
Vista Landscape Manual, community requirements and project
CC&R's.
Maintenance is divided into the following categories of responsi-
bility:
Individual Property Ownership
Private Homeowner's Association
Master Developer Open Space Maintenance District
Open Space Maintenance District - Administered by the
City of Chula Vista
Areas proposed for inclusion in public Open Space Districts are
indicated in the exhibit on the following page.
In general, the overall appearance of the landscape shall be
neat, healthy and free of weeds and debris. All new construc-
tion of multi-family, Planned Unit Development and unclassified
uses shall be landscaped in accordance with a City approved
Landscape Plan, and subject to City inspection for adequate
maintenance levels.
(03/04/91 )
V-22
31 -/~r
Q)
()
c
co
c
.$
.c
ffi
~
Q)
~
S-
c
Q)
Q.
o
.' r.
" ~,'
,.
'f
11\ .
.~
"
\ ,
..,'
. ...
\
+"
u
.>=
+"
CIl
is
Q)
u
c:
co
c:
Q)
+"
.~
co
~
Q)
U
co
a.
C/)
c:
Q)
a.
o
o
- .
Ul
UlQ.
0'"
';:: E
-
Ul-
.- '"'
0'"
~
(fj-
, >-
0.0
-"'0
o Q)
_J::
c: Ul
Q):=
_.0
)( ."
Q)-
_ Ul
." Q)
.~ Q)
u...Q
W
I-
o
Z
V-23
~/-/~g
~H
(5~ ~
r=
~~
EJ
o
0>
-
en
-
-
o
-
~i
I--;;;r~
~i
@j
aJ
=1
Landscape Desiqn Criteria Checklist
The landscape development of each specific parcel must be com-
patible with the overall comprehensive landscaping effort. The
following checklist is provided for the convenience of the
parcel developer and those responsible for reviewing the imple-
menting a specific portion of work. All landscape design shall
conform to appropriate landscape and irrigation standards, and
the maintenance requirements contained herein, and shall be
approved by the City Landscape Architect.
The following components of the landscape designs prepared for
each development project (parcel) should be reviewed for con-
sistency with these guidelines:
1. Entries
a. Entry Monument
Refer to "Entries" section to determine location
and type. Parcel R-7 is potential gate guarded
neighborhood.
b. Signage
Refer to "Signage" section in the development regu-
lations. Signage must be approved by the city of
Chula Vista and the Master Developer.
c. Plant Materials
Flowering accent trees and permanent, easily main-
tained flowering shrubs and ground covers are en-
couraged, subject to approval. Seasonal flower
color and high maintenance plant materials are
discouraged.
2. Walls and Fencing
a. Periphery Fencing
Refer to wall/fence exhibit for type and location.
b. Interior Fencing
Should be compatible with project architecture and
located to provide free access to service meters.
It should also screen any undesirable views (e.g.,
trash storage)
c. Fencing heights and types should be coordinated to
present a compatible appearance.
(12/18/90)
V-24
31 - I h9
3. Interfaces
Refer to the "Edges" section for the type of
treatment. The following types of interfaces should be
recognized:
a. Canyon/open Space Interface
Parcels R-1, R-2, R-3, R-6 & R-7. Conform to
"Fire suppression/Fuel Modification" requirements.
b. Park or School Interface
Parcel R-6.
c. SDG&E Interface
Parcel R-7.
d. East "H" Street Landscaped Buffer
Parcel R-7.
4. Periphery Landscape
a. Periphery landscaping shall conform to the General
Landscape Plan.
b. Adherence to the streetscape techniques contained
herein will also be required.
5. Interior Landscape
a. There are two categories for interior landscape:
Developer installed - subject to Master
Developer and City approval.
Individual installed - Not subject to Master
Developer and City approval, except for pos-
sible encroachment into open space.
b. Developer installed landscape will include:
Slope erosion planting with manual irrigation
system. Systems to be connected to indivi-
dual house meter.
Street trees installed in the street tree
easement. Exact type, location and staking
of tree subject to approval by City.
(12/18/90)
V-25
3 1- I rO
VI. ~ PLANNING CRITERIA
(08/10/90)
VI-l
31-lrl
Product Development
The Rancho del Rey SPA III Plan includes certain minimum resi-
dential property development standards. These have been repro-
duced below for reference. It should be understood however,
that adherence to these minimum standards will not automatically
create a project that will be acceptable to the City. The adop-
ted standards are intended to provide flexibility for creative
and efficient site planning, and innovative architectural solu-
tions. They are not intended to be used to create substandard
developments.
RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
Land Use District
~ ~p- RC RSP
1.
Lot area (in net OOO's s.f.)
minimum
minimum average
2.
Lot width (in feet)
minimum
minimum average
3.
Lot depth (in feet)
4.
Lot coverage (percentage)
5.
Floor Area Ratio.
6. Front yard setback (from
Public Street ROW)
al To direct entry garage**
b) To side entry garage**
c) To main residence
7. Side yard setback
a)
To adjacent residential lot
(min. total/min. one side)
Distance between detached
residential units
To adjacent street
(corner lot)
1
yard setback
10/5
bl
c)
8.
9.
Rear
Building height, feet (maximum)2
12-1/2 story maximum in RS & RP)
accessory bldg., maximum
5.0
6.0
50
50
90
45
.55
15
10
15
10
10
15
28
15 15
3.5
4.0
Sp
Sp
40
45
Sp
Sp
90*
Sp
Sp
50
.60
Sp
Sp
Sp
Sp
15
10
10
Sp
Sp
Sp
Sp
Sp
Sp
10/3
Sp
Sp
10
Sp
Sp
10
Sp
Sp
15*
Sp
Sp
28
Sp
Sp
10.
Parking spaces per unit
2 21.5sp
(gar.) (gar.) 1 bdrm
+1 guest unit
15
ppJ
*May be modified with Site Plan approval
**Lots fronting on East "J" Street, west of Paseo
Ranchero: 28' direct entry, 23' side entry
garage in RS & RP districts
1 . f
Except10n or one story structures per
19.26.150 CVMC
2
May be increased to 35 feet with Site Plan approval
3
As required for uses approved in Precise Plan
(12/18/90)
VI-2
3/-IT';;
2.0 sp
2 bdrm
unit
2.5 sp
3+ bdrm
unit
.",rr\:~)-~\
"'.0', \\".v..;...-'~\:
1.t\\::'..:,1., -r~~r;;\~\."-:.
~__t-:- I{r'~, _ \~'~nQ'
~.,1~~lf..?> i)\~~~\ ~~f~'t 1 r-;'
.....'~.......- ~ ll~ "'"'''\ ~-'"........ "
....~~.,.<<,j,"'")~..,-(' ,I' \ .-.:r-;j'-" {..~
~........<..."'l,;'1\.~Jr'r'.....~.:.~ ,)'-t- C.\t:.
J~ ........-Y"...-.......................,Ji"I'.'.-(T'1.... ----7 <it"
-1v->-v--<",- ..)............- ....'.. lrJ.1'- ~
...r:,....,~'ttt1 _ ;]It",'l'A t1o;--r.:."\
I""'_',V..... t-\......~"..l" .-.-- ~'<..",X.....
~.... ('\"1 ..."'- """"''''''',\ ;,).. ~ E""
,r"'\...,~,~'r"( ~~~H/ \... _ _ --."'_<;..~;/'~~'<..;"
\~' >'::1 ...,:: ,,~(, '
I \).~(liJ "~""\ft1' ~,''',?<<, J'-.\"......
o I .,,11 ~.. / '\'~/......,,/....O\:..
\. RS~...;---_...... ,'r<-~~'7-].r.:..
-- ........./ , "'~Yf. "Yt: :'\ \
05-1/ R5 R5 \ ';,$~~\'{/l\
_, ....-_......"'""\ !Ii /t'\,,\y <'~/}
- , '- _",--.;:f" 'v-;:'~'1 ,
/ -r '.. V \";,"-'
..... ,.. y"l
-- RP I " >> ,"
;;~V'(i;~
^ '
rr"':';,,\:"~
.('){',,'
<>
J'
c.. 05-1
........................
----
....................
----
--
,~
'-~
-'I
11
Ii
lr
/
/ /
'K -/ /
(0,05-2/
~:i~ /"/
// J .------....
---- ,/ /' --.;" --
...._J.._/ ---
H URU'
EH'
R5P
R5P
~ Residential Land Use District
i- \;:IRS
t> L-..::.--J Residential Single Family District
~ 0 Residential P1amed Concept District
~ 0 Residentiel Condominium District
G Residential Speciality District
Special Purpose District
B Open Space-l District B
a Open Space-2 District
R5
RP 1:." '"' ~
" t,:",,,,,')~~1'"
~RS""''''' ..'I'rm-.;r~;~~\,y:~y~
, l....~ 1..")< ;..")
_ JLl\I.1~;,:.,.<T~t...:>)\~t_".~.:.
,- -_,.....-r" q~~fI~ >_.,"'-....l,~...
~ 05-3 \1 ~~r 1.-') 11"', ('(:);1,~~~...1\--1
1[:.1;"lll\I~,qt1\\\ I."'\"}~~~"
._.;;;~..T\\\\\\\\\rl,\H}~\;,\\\>'\~-~ ..
___ H\-~\H-\,l-....L"j\f: "'~~ ....,;,.-~..
/." l \ I,' I;',\'(T,.,....... ~ t"; -""'....
I R5 :"-1"\1'0'"~' .,~
I ,/7"," .....- 05-1
'_..I, ('
. .
.
Open Space-3 District
~l...lG"~'"
05 1
.R@2!QQ~ReyB11'
Land
Use
Districts
05-2
^
\
10126/90
['J
~ iB.
: ~ ! '~'9'1l9'6'~
Exhibit 20
Ci1ti
.-
HOUSING TYPE: SFD-Conventional
EXAMPLE LOT SIZE: 50'x 100'
!70' 1Yf'/Ct'V-
~It'
~
~
,
~
"-I
~
,~~.,
~~
T'rfJ~ BfJ(UJI/'Ie
,qwa..ot'.e
.=;rO Q;fVqw~,
/--OT 51U!3- 91"(00
y----:=- ---- -" - --,
Im~1
, . ~ ~ I
,: 7.! Sr ~
,I I
I -, I
rr-;. ,/ ~_~--_I,
L - \ __oJ AII1lV
"", I ."1".....
I
I
\
I
\
\
\ .
I
\
I
I
VI-3
f)f/'.Ie
~t{
1#
a:w
~
,
,
J
-J
~~~
/-or ~~~PW'1f/rf
~~A$
3/-lr'l
HOUSING TYPE: SFD-Cottage
EXAMPLE LOT SIZE: 44'x95'
/'fL'fJ'/7lVl{ I () ,
.::t31/'fYWO/,/
--l
I
\
I
r1
1~
I~
+----4 ,~
I ~
I I
_J
"If 1Y11tN-
-- -~
I
I
~'~'.~.
~~
,~
~~
7ff/0- ~()/UJ/AG
/qW~
~ s7W'/ffj.15'
VI-4
lC-~----~--'-:r
I I "
., ' ',,-- /,
......-...-..... ....
l /
-... /(~'A
F;Wt1'
{<ff
'jJtP
f)t'{'VB-
€/"f~
\ ~ti% ~
UTT W/J7Tft5 ~ ON~ptVff
~ O.G5~ fr'
.~iJIjf~
3'-/"r5
HOUSING TYPE: SFD-Cottage
EXAMPLE LOT SIZE: 40'x90'
~'7Y/'/~
sif~tf
--, -...........
~-l
I
- I ..............
. 't
~~. ~
,~ . ~
.~ ~~ ~ ~
7Yf/~ f!}()/tOlNG
P;wew~
lfO ClJT}A€e., ,
J.4T ~ -fOX1tJ
VI-S
31-1"1-'
f'=:'-- -;="-~)
,I ~ \
,I
I . ....-, 'I
I / , I
I . \ '
\... _ _ J fJj;Ie \. _ '" 'J
~
NT
~.
--
~f'1JN FUt7jl-.
JAlT WI{)71iS~~
A%!1':ta Je t7~ . i:';Y:
f} .:7{'/'fCe
HOUSING TYPE: SFD-Cottage
g4l~~
r -- -----
(._~----~- 1
. 'S d J
__ I . ,-:---_...-- "'"
, ~:::::.:.:::::::::::::::~:::~:::::::::::::::::t, t I,' I '/I
5 I~t:~:~r""'" ........................ ..................................... G \ f7Y'1/v I
~~~~~jjIjjjjj~~~jjjjjj~~~~~j~jjjjjjjj~~~~jjIjj~jjjjjj~jjjjjIj~~jjjjjjjjt { I \ :
:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.::.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.::.:.:.:.:.:, I ,_-.... ./
~~, - 5~!
~~ ~
~
W/~~!HJ1/'8
sr=O ~
~!~ FH~
I'~
~.",,~eu;r
~Mi11 tw5 t'#-
.~ WG~~
~~~.
VI-6
3/-lrr-
Site Development Standards
Numerous site development criteria are included in Section VI.8
of the SPA III Plan. The following are presented as supplements
to those basic guidelines.
Single Family Products
On the following pages a series of lot/building schematics
are presented to provide additional guidance in the design
of single family housing types. The attached townhouse and
specialty developments follow. It should be stressed that
the schematics and building envelopes that follow are proto-
typical lotting concepts and are not intended to constrain
more creative solutions to spatial relationships. Special
attention is also given to the issues of streetscape quality
and corner lot situations in small lot areas. The open
cul-de-sac site planning technique is also illustrated.
Yard Restrictions
Careful attention to maintaining continuity of design during
initial construction can be negated by subsequent individual
homeowner improvements. Enclosed additions, patio struc-
tures, decks, storage sheds, fencing and other similar home-
owner improvements are of particular concern. Yet, restric-
tions such as setbacks, coverage, materials, etc. must
relate to the particular type of lot and residence
involved. In order to both control these homeowner improve-
ments and, at the same time, relate the restrictions to the
particular characteristics of the housing type involved, a
"Homeowner Improvements Guide" shall be a required component
of the mandated Site Plan Review. This supplement will
detail for each housing type, the specific restrictions on
the size and location of balconies, covered patios, enclosed
additions, or storage buildings. In addition, specific
guidance and restrictions shall be provided for materials,
colors and design characteristics. This supplement shall be
officially adopted as a component of the Site Plan Review
approval. And to insure continued conformance, it will also
become a component of the recorded CC&R's given to each new
home purchaser.
(08/10/90)
VI-7
a I-Ir~
r--rr r-
I I I I I I
I I I I I I
~ ~~J.w I ~' L~'
.
~-
/~~
\ \
\
~"'"
STREETSCAPES
-r ---rr--
I I I : 1 I
I I I I
;;,'_1-t5' I
.14-1' 1'7' 5/'
--
VARY LOT WIDTHS
"ARY' FRONT YARD SETBACKS
.. e.
. .
VI-8
PARKWAY FURNITURE
.3/-1-,.9
CORNER LOT TREATMENT with SMALL LOTS
1 .
I
I 1 iIItroHE
~_.L
(,(jp et~ tJ!7fl
--
r I~
I I.ME6~
. ~
~-
~~~~LW
r'w~
~terNP ~
I
~1 :
/0,1.. /5
/6'
/I,~T \
;crw:/r'~;ze. '5ft
VI-9
,3/-/ra
~~~.
OPEN CUL DE SAC
(with Open Space Access)
/f~
W'~fiF
PRESERVE DESIRABLE VIEW
VI-l0
BLOCK UNDESIRABLE VIEW
31 -I <j I
Open Space Fencing
(without Open Space Access)
DWjW ~ t)fff::l?
CtiVr()Jl/tJ{/S / ~ F/..IfT
VIew ffiU::I~ -1 fftrt
---== . .... . .....,..~
..---:::: .......- ""..,. '::f$/;:~:::::::' ::::.:.:::::~:;:/ . ~~ --...;.
---...... .",.,. ~ -.....;
--;;,- -....- ........ ~
14/}J. IP{ ,
UW!JMIIJ6 @NO-
~ $f
rew:-e
-------- "
. --------
VI.l0a
al-18~
!If.flto fer'
t~~
Open Space Fencing
..
..
tf4
fIrAP/fd tJ6l tet
~f8J~
V/BJ.J ft;if,Ce "- ."
ft. I fZ,k{ Iftrt "::J
* WAtL- \
.. .
t~Mr
Rear and Sideyard Fencing
!1JN. 10 I U4tI1/Jtf:IrfI;fJS tre4
~~<;ft}l~
j1/1!i !W/)
f ffr$t:nC-
@
4
!!Jr~ ca.te.~
VI-10b
Cul-De-Sac Fencing
3/-/fl3
Attached Products
Site plans for attached products should consider the follow-
ing issues: indoor and outdoor privacy, solar access, build-
ing appearance, and overall project design appeal. Build-
ings should be oriented to create courtyards and open space
areas, thus increasing the aesthetic appeal of the site.
Building architecture should incorporate a variety of units,
building sizes and heights, and color accents. Building
facades should include relief to avoid a monotonous appear-
ance. Stairwells should be covered and integrated into the
overall building design, and private spaces such as patios
or balconies are encouraged for each unit. Another design
consideration is the need to buffer group parking areas from
the street and adjacent properties. A few of these design
concepts are illustrated below and on the following pages.
w 711~
... . -..'
, .
-.. .....:".
.... ."
.... ".. .~.
."... ........
w~. ./111(5. !!tJ~
~!VI1', y~y .se~
frY" //f7E!Il-ES"r
(10/26/90)
!lr;f 7fl1f;
.0
'.
11J;:~1'<5
'VI; 6~.
.'
. ."
. .
tll((!5fj;J-~
~~~. ~
I1INI77J~r
MUL TI-F AMIL Y SITE DESIGN
VI-12
.3 I - I' If
tVIlG>l'~
,..- c;r;;c-ve .5~~ ~
ViSQ;'\"- 6. --.....
7111:;; IVIT 71fI'G
ti&1\fl~#:fii;ff$
",I>". ..vg:!~~fidjW
;!41i.'llij~~- I ~\'!S= 'W'
~ ~e ~tJSr?6 ~
~ "'-' /'fP/y077?I'i?V,5
G~
MULTI-FAMILY
STREET ORIENTATION
VI-12
3/-185
/II /ilGlCI'- ~ ~B::;J'3 ~ 7fJ::I<. II~ t?flN1e
;,M. P~IV6J ~ .1'Vt:1V/Pt1/'t=- t//YI!2 ~ ~
7VfW!iiiP ~ tl~ IW 4(, Yl'r'Ve:rr VI JV/"tf'$ rf?
/'dIlltJ /k I1ll1fJ71I1Y ,c ~ ~'^ afV/I~~'
GQ
6b
I
S
'1 i'ltlbT!J:/1/H' ~ /t-r:f1~CI. ~(/Sf/rt9. If:" / IS;' #A ~. ~
r /i<o?~ ~ II/Itr('fi;;; d/V/'I IPIfi!rV7TTY ~ ~
~J~~n~~ ~$'AI9~~'g;~
/JUIIPTIV&' flj<;'fS ft ~M"\7P 1'I.AS..5~. 7JtIS W/~ /'t6~
~j<<-QY~ V/f'Ver( ~ ~ b~~e.
MUL Tt-F AMIL Y SITE DESIGN
VI-13
31-1'i~
Desiqn Issues ~ Parcel
The product descriptions, lot and pad sizes, and parcel plan
features described in this section are those envisioned at the
the of SPA III Plan preparation. These designs and specifica-
tions are subject to change and refinement in conjunction with
the tentative tract map approval, and are subject to such ap-
proval. Any alternative parcel plans which are prepared should
respond to the listed planning and design criteria, implementing
the techniques and solutions described in the previous sections
of this text. All parcel plans shall conform to the development
standards and other provisions of the Rancho del Rey SPA III PC
District regulations adopted by the City of Chula Vista.
Single Family Detached
Single Family Detached is the primary housing type in the
development of SPA III. The following are guidelines for
site planning each of the single family detached parcels
designated for single family detached products (key maps are
provided to identify the location of each parcel).
(12/18/90)
VI.14
3/-/rr
Parcel R-1: This "parcel" consists of three in-fill areas
at the end of Paseo Margarita, Paseo Cresta, and along Paseo
Entrada. The most important design issue regarding ~his
parcel is the integration of new development with the exist-
ing homes on adjacent lots. The architectural design and
scale of the new homes should compliment the established
neighborhood character. Grading to create lots should also
blend with the contours of existing development. The street
interface of the several flag lots proposed at the end of
Paseo Margarita should also receive special attention.
Where lots back to Paseo Ladera, the rear fencing and street
landscaping should be consistent with community themes.
Parcel R-1
Design Criteria Summary
Product: CONVENTIONAL SFD
~,-;"->
-,
. ,
i:~ -- .""
, -
~--;
- \_~~-
Minimum Pad Size: 6,000 sf
Average Lot Size: 9,120 sf
Special Desiqn Issues
Grading: adjacent to Telegraph Canyon buffer, adjacent to paseo
Ladera
Entry: Existing adjacent neighborhood
Fencing: Telegraph Canyon Road views; integration with eXisting
neighborhood fences
Edges: Telegraph Canyon Road, Paseo Ladera; community facility
parcel (CF-1); existing neighborhood
Landscaping:
open space edges; community facility edge
(10/26/90)
VI-15
3/- IB 8
Parcel R-2: This conventional SFD parcel is located in the
northeastern portion of the site, adjacent to open space, an
existing elementary school and neighborhood park/greenbelt.
Pedestrian access through this parcel via East "J" street to
the elementary sChool/park area is an important design
criterion. The primary access to the parcel is from Paseo
Ranchero and from the eastern end of East "J" street. A
small portion of the parcel adjoins the SFA site (parcel
R-6). This edge should recieve special edge treatment for
buffering. This parcel also includes several lots on Calle
Candelero, adjacent to an existing residential neighbor-
hood. The integration design issues discussed for Parcel
R-1 are relevant for these lots.
Parcel R-2
Design Criteria Summary
Average Lot Size: 7,430 sf
Product: TRADITIONAL SFD
Minimum Pad Size: 5,000 sf
Special Desiqn Issues
Grading: Slopes adjoining open space
Entry: Located on major community entry road; transistion of
East "J" Street from collector to residential street
Fencing: Open space views
Edges: Open space; existing school/park and residential
neighborhood; townhouse edge
Landscaping:
Interface with natural open space; Paseo Ranchero
streetscape
(10/26/90)
VI-16
3/-/i'
Parcel R-3: This parcel is located on the central plateau,
north of East "J" street and overlooks the south leg of Rice
Canyon. It is planned for traditional single family detach-
ed products on conventional sized lots. The important
design areas in this parcel are the edges, one abutting the
canyon rim, one facing East "J" Street, and two adjoining
existing development.
Most lots adjacent to the Villa Palmera project, at the
southwestern edge of the parcel, will have down slopes in
their rear yards creating a buffer to separate the two pro-
jects. Where a grade differential does not exist, adequate
fencing and landscaping will need to be provided. At the
western parcel boundary, SPA III homes will share a collec-
tor street with existing homes. The issue of complimentary
design and scale become important at this location. Along
the southern edge, additional lot depth is required for
those lots on East "J" Street because of the City's setback
standard for homes fronting on collector streets. The lot
pattern along the canyon rim has been designed to maximize
the view potential of these home sites. Repetitive roof
styles which would be noticeable from within or across the
canyon should be avoided. Landscaping on the adjacent
slopes should obscure these homes as viewed from the canyon
trail without blocking the views from the homes themselves.
Parcel R-3
Design Criteria Summary
~~
Product: TRADITIONAL SFD
Minimum Pad Size: 5,000 sf
Average Lot Size: 7,200 sf
~..:--~--
Special Desiqn Issues
Grading: Canyon slopes; existing adjacent development
Entry: none
Fencing: Canyon views; compliment existing development
Edges: Canyon; existing development
Landscaping:
Canyon interface; existing development
(10/26/90)
VI-17
31-/90
Parcel R-4: This parcel is located south of East "J" Street
and east of existing Paseo Ladera. This site is above the
existing development to the southeast so design coordination
with existing development is limited to that north of East
"J" Street. The views from East "J" street and Paseo Ladera
to rear elevations, perimeter fencing and landscaping will
be the most important edge considerations.
Access to the parcel from East "J" Street is to be provided
by two entries. The location of these entries must be coor-
dinated with those to parcels north of East "J" Street to
provide adequate intersection spacing.
Parcel R-4
Design Criteria Summary
Product: SFO (Home size 1,300 - 1,700 sf)
Minimum Pad Size: 3,520 sf
Special Oesiqn Issues
Average Lot Size: 5,640 sf
Grading: Slopes adjacent to Paseo Ladera
Entry: Intersection spacing
Fencing: Perimeter fencing; views to the south
Edges: East "J" Street; Paseo Ladera
Landscaping: East "J" Street & Paseo Ladera perimeter
(10/26/90)
VI-18
3/- /9 I
Parcel R-5: This parcel is located in the middle of the
central ridge and lies between Parcel R-2 and East "J"
street. All property adjacent to this parcel is within the
SPA III so coordination with existing development is not an
issue here. The primary design issue for this parcel is the
appearance of the project perimeter along East "J" street
and Paseo Ranchero. A second issue is the alignment/spacing
of entries with those of the school, park and single-family
attached project across East "J" Street.
Parcel R-5
Design Criteria Summary
Product: SFD (Home size 1,550
2,000 sf)
Minimum Pad Size: 3,600 sf
Special Desiqn Issues
Average Lot Size: 4,360 sf
Grading: none
Entry: Spacing with entries to S-1/P-1 and R-6
Fencing: Perimeter fence along Paseo Ranchero and East "J"
Street
Edges: Paseo Ranchero and East "J" Street
Landscaping: Edge conditions
(10/26/90)
VI-19
31-19~
Single Family Attached
In attached product areas, site design, landscaping and
grading should create housing clusters to establish "neigh-
borhoods" within the larger housing project. Neighborhood
clusters should be limited to approximately 100 dwelling
units. Satellite recreational/social centers, which compli-
ment the primary project amenity, should be provided within
each cluster. Greenbelt pedestrian circulation routes
should provide a framework for housing clusters, connecting
to local recreation areas and community-wide paths.
Parcel R-6: This parcel is located on the south side of
East "Jlr""""5treet, adjacent to the neighborhood park site.
Due to this location, a primary design issue is establishing
a buffer between the residential and educational/recreation-
al uses while also providing a visual integration of the two
uses. It will be important to clearly define public vs.
private open space areas and to prevent students from other
areas using the SFA project as a "short-cut" to the school/
park. Where feasible, an elevation change should be provid-
ed, along with appropriate fencing and landscaping to buffer
the two uses. Alternatively, an interior street could be
used to separate the two uses. Similar or complimentary
plant materials should be used to unify the visual character
of the area. Interesting forms and detailing should be
evident in the building elevations which face the park or
public open space areas, as well as those visible from
public streets. See the accompanying sketch which illus-
trates the desired park edge treatment.
The southern edge of the parcel is within the Telegraph
Canyon Road view corridor. This is a designated scenic
highway and the edge of residential development should be
sensitive to views from the roadway. Grading and landscape
design in this area should be responsive to scenic highway
design criteria; graded contours blending with natural
slopes and planted with native/naturalized landscaping to
maintain the natural character of the Telegraph Canyon Road
corridor. The perimeter treatment along the northern edge,
adjacent to East "J" street, should also receive special
landscape and/or fencing design consideration.
Parcel entries from East "J" Street should be coordinated
with the school site and Parcels R-2 and R-5 to assure
proper intersection spacing.
Because of the residential units within this parcel are
attached, an effort should be made to maximize the quality
of common open space during the site planning process. The
site plan should incorporate internal elevation changes and
landscaping to create smaller clusters of units within the
project.
(12/18/90)
VI-20
~/-I'~
fIJ:Y
MJRff"lfl7<fU
.
.
,
.
,
.
.
~ .
~.:
~.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
~ '0.
.
r-
VlH
C Townhouse
oncept Plan
" I
~'
.
.
.
.
.~1!9heQEL m
Del Rey Part
_ VI-21 nership
3/-1'i1/
TOWNHOME/PARK EDGE
";';:::;:::;:;:;::'"
.............
................
....:.:;::;:::;:::::.:.;....
'Jew WAtt, ~";V
/JJfTl! /~~
"p'f<6f ~~.
NOTE: Final design should meet the following objectives: 1) minimize park activity
nuisances to residents (noise, stray balls, etc.); 2) minimize visual perception of
residential structures and parking by park users; and, 3) provide security to private
residences adjoining public park property.
VI-22
31 -1'1.5
Parcel R-6
Design Criteria Summary
=-~J:. ~rO-
Product: TOWNHOMES "'
--
Minimum Pad Size: N/A
Average Lot Size: N/A
Special Desiqn Issues
Grading: Park site interface; Telegraph Canyon edge
Entry: Alignment with adjacent entries
Fencing: Views to Telegraph Canyon Road; Park site separation
Edges: Telegraph Canyon; East "J" Street; Park site
Landscaping: Edge conditions
(10/26/90)
VI-23
3/-/''''
Specialty Residential
Parcel R-7: This parcel is the proposed site of a seniors
oriented community which would include a combination of
single family attached and detached products, along with
multi-family or stacked housing products with densities
comparable to other projects within Rancho del Rey. Single
family products could include innovative zero-lot line,
Z-lot, or other clustered designs to maximize common open
space areas. Lower densities should be planned toward Paseo
Ranchero with-higher densities west of the SDG&E easement.
The location, distribution and amount of each product type
will be determined during the precise plan process which is
required prior to any development of this parcel.
This parcel has a visually prominent location along the
south side of East "H" street, a designated scenic highway,
and along the edge of the south leg of Rice Canyon. A
special landscape setback which averages 80 feet in width
(measured from the southern curb line of East "H" street) is
required by the EI Rancho del Rey Specific Plan for that
portion of the residential parcel across from the Employment
Park on the north side of East "H" Street (portion of R-7
west of SDG&E easement). The greenbelt/trail should also
extend to Paseo Ranchero but is not required to have the
minimum dimensions specified for the area across from the
Employment Park. The exhibits on the following pages
illustrate the setback requirement and conceptual design for
the area. The berm along East "H" Street should screen the
first floor of buildings within the Specialty Housing area,
at its highest point. All visible development, entries,
fencing, building elevations, and landscaping along the
entire East "H" Street frontage should receive special
design attention. Along the canyon edge, these same design
elements will define the development edge which will be
highly visible from the existing residential areas on the
south side of the canyon. Site planning along the canyon
edge should extend canyon views into the development area
through the use of the open cul-de-sac or parking area
technique where appropriate (see sketch).
Public utility facilities, an SDG&E powerline and water
district reservoir, are located within the parcel. On-site
grading will need to maintain these facilities and adjacent
landscaping will need to transition to the naturalized
vegetation within the open space parcels. The design
concept for adjacent areas should attempt to integrate these
areas into the overall plan rather than exclude or block
from view with massive forms which have an artificial
appearance. Public trail access from East "H" Street to
Rice Canyon will be provided via the SDG&E easement or
vicinity. The alignment of the trail, together with
consideration of accessory or incidental uses of the
privately maintained open space area which are compatible
with utility and trail uses, will be determined in
(03/04/91)
VI-24
3/-/t1-r-
Specialty Housing Concept Plan
Parcel R-7
<
..
I\)
~'"
-
,
-
...a
00
'/I'tfl'tliT
~
::::.... ....
;tWo'-
~r"'#r
~ttm'
~~.
~~~~
.~<2r!2~""'~
Ci1ti
& As&x;aes
1""lI,' I', II:II~
CANYON EDGE
Parcel R-7
/~OMp ::'JI;fJ6t...e
tJT~Y ~e7IT6 /11 .
'NfRfG:5 ~N'6 CWJttJAl
~
~<f~
OI'rU/JP ~
/V,tIJW -/11/
f{)f!il~
wewAlG ,-1t7Q;S
~~
fJrtUr,iJ If.
/Pfrlo-f
~~~
VI-26
3 I - 19'
..
a.
Q)
(.)
c:
8
"-
~
-
::J
co
Q)
~
C,)
(J)
1:J
c:
as
...J
\ 1\
, \~
_,J '
-l
\ i
\
\
If \
~~ .
I ~I; ~
I u..,.....a
. --
I 00' ~
. w
i
.
j 00<
.
i 0
/ EJ
/ ~
.
i
i
i
i
.
i
/
/
/
/
i
i
.
~ i
. .
If-' ~' i
Iff :
I~" /
J'~ /
~ : : /
_ w /
-l/ r~;;/
.
.
VI-27 /
_J
-'I
~~~
.'Q~
Sj
si
@J
al
[Ii
'3 ,- 200
at7T
/I!lP~
, ,.
~:
~k, PrO.
{::()cC6 L'(.V / ..-r-.
I'm~ A"t!7't
~r
/f?C-f5tW7V
~
:5
'"
<Xl
.........
...........
.............
...............
................
..................
........
..........
...........
............
.............
.............
.<:;:: :-I.:;:;::
~
-
.
tI
o
"
'f1
&"Or "1/'
f:1Jreer
~
/1U:iAb {}tfJ
.~QQ~E!rr
East H Street Buffer
Conceptual Features
~
<'IWkJIriI<..
~
teffl
fJJT
ill:!
~1fj
?tWt~ .
.
Ci1li
.-
Ifol9' 1l!l 'e'~
" \ 1 ... ... 8f
<Do.
"'-. <D<D
~ .;:U 5
(/)c
0
::co
'\ ~--
... ~ EJ
en <D
co.....
w.....
::s
en
I ..r
.J ~~~
I
~[~
I J~
I
!~
~!
~
;.,
~
J d~
/ o~
~
~ ~
/ . &
/~ ~i
!i-
II
aJ
/
// ~
~
~
. [I
VI-29 I
.3 ~t-; ~-().O)
EAST H STREET
Expanded Parkway
/l!1'If:
'7r"_~'____
.f,tUfI6~";'-4f:/
.-.....,.,.,.,..
tl!<Ml' "",...
,.'
~
..'
~
-, ,
'~erf~"'''':t''MlT~
.~~.t.:1-1:'
.~~linf!!f'.
~
-"'"
,.' tJVrOfO
II'f'I'*'i(
lMT
if"~
u'
~
ni:l T.\1TrrtrmO DiIW1T IQIW r; ...~cm
~)I,!'\lUJ.JJ; UW ~JJ. J/7 -o)(j.3~ It~
conjunction with Precise Plan approval. Dedication of the
trail as an open space lot through the private area shall
occur with subdivision mapping to implement the approved
Precise Plan.
Within the parcel, as the locations for each distinctive
product type are established, grading, landscaping and other
buffering techniques should be implemented to separate less
compatible densities.
A connector road which extends between the two primary
access points (East "R" street and Paseo Ranchero) should be
provided to function as a circulation spine for the project,
provide guest parking and link housing clusters (see Concept
Plan sketch). Internal circulation and parking areas should
be planned to avoid confusion and congestion. Direction and
information signs should be designed to be functional and to
blend with the architectural character of the development.
Circulation for oversized emergency and service vehicles is
also an important design criteria.
Parcel R-7
,""--.-~-
\_---::.~-
Design Criteria Summary
Product: SPECIALTY NEIGHBORHOOD (mixed products)
Minimum Pad Size: N/A
Average Lot Size: N/A
Special Desiqn Issues
Grading: Slopes along Rice Canyon; adjacent to SDG&E easement
and water tank
Entry: Align with Employment Park on East "R" Street
Fencing: Perimeter along East "H" ~treet and Paseo Ranchero;
canyon views
Edges: All
Landscaping: Treatment along scenic corridors, entry, and
employment park; integration/transition to
natural and naturalized open space
(03/04/91 )
VI-31
31-~otf
The attached is additional information
for
Item No. 31
~ [- JOS
RESOLUTION EIR-89-10(a)
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION
RECERTIFYING THE FINAL EIR-89-10 FOR RANCHO DEL REY SPA
III.
WHEREAS; the Planning Commission at its meeting of November 14, 1990,
voted to recommend certification of EIR 89-10, Rancho del Rey SPA III and
WHEREAS; the Planning Corrvnission approved tentative subdivision map PCS
90-02, Request to subdi vide 404.9 acres known as Rancho del Rey SPA I II, at
its meeting of May 22, 1991 and
WHEREAS; it was determined that the EIR 89-10 should be recertified prior
to the approval of the PCS 90-02,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE it resolved that the Planning Commission recertifies
EIR 89-10 has been prepared and in compliance with CEQA, the state CEQA
Guidelines and the environmental review procedure of the City of Chula Vista.
PASSES AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA,
CALIFORNIA, this twelfth day of June, 1991 by the following votes, to witness:
AYES:
Commissioners Carson, Tugenberg, Grasser-Horton, Martin,
Decker, Full er
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSENTIONS: None
S&:{:~~J~~
ATTEST:
~~u 7>. 1I'.l~ r
Na cy Ri Jl ey, Secret ry
WPC 9428P
~I'JO(P
/'
~
~-
Resolution PCM-90-6-(C)
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL
APPROVE THE DESIGN GUIDELINES FOR RANCHO DEL
REY SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA (SPA) III
WHEREAS, a duly verified application for a Sectional
Area Plan including Design Guidelines was filed with the
Department of the city of Chula Vista by Rancho
Partnership, and
WHEREAS, said Design Guidelines constitute a manual to guide
the design of site plans, architecture, and landscape architecture
within sectional Planning Area III (SPA III) of the Rancho del Rey
Planned community, and
planning
Planning
del Rey
WHEREAS, the planning Commission set the time and place for a
hearing on said Design Guidelines and notice of said hearing,
together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a
newspaper of general circulation in the city and its mailing to
property owners within 300 feet of the exterior boundaries of the
property at least ten days prior to the hearing, and
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as
advertised, namely 7:00 p.m., May 8. 1991, and continued to 7:00
p.m., May 22, 1991, in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue,
before the Planning Commission and said hearing was thereafter
closed, and
WHEREAS, the commission found that the Design Guidelines are
not a project under CEQA.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION
finds as follows:
1. The Design Guidelines for Rancho del Rey SPA III are in
conformance with the EI Rancho del Rey Specific Plan and the
Chula vista General Plan: and
2. The Design Guidelines for Rancho del Rey SPA III will promote
the orderly development of the involved sectional planning
area and ensure a consistent quality of development in keeping
with the fundamental concepts established for the approved
SPA.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION recommends
that the city council approve the Design Guidelines for Rancho del
Rey SPA III.
That a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the owners of
the property and the city council.
3'- Jo=1-"
PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA,
CALIFORNIA, this 22nd day of May, 1991, by the following vote, to-
wit:
AYES:
Commissioners Carson, Tugenberg, Grasser Horton, Martin, Decker,
and Fuller
None
NOES:
ABSENT: None
ABSTENTIONS: None
)/-.11 /1 0
,.?;-1l' (jif'~ Jhn. "'--'
Sh ,ley Grasser Horton
ATTEST:
~~2~)
Nancy Ri ley, See etary
-01" J,6<6
RESOLUTION NO. PCS-90-02
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHUIA VISTA PIANNING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL
APPROVE THE TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR
RANCHO DEL REY SECTIONAL PIANNING AREA (SPA)
III, CHUIA VISTA TRACT 90-02
WHEREAS, a duly verified application for a tentative
subdivision map was filed with the Planning Department of the City
of Chula vista on November 8, 1989 by Rancho del Rey PartnerShip,
and
WHEREAS, said application requested the subdivision of
approximately 405 acres into residential lots, open space areas, a
school lot, park and community purpose facility lot, and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission set the time and place for a
hearing on said tentative subdivision map application and notice of
said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its
publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and
its mailing to property owners within 300 feet of the exterior
boundaries of the property at least ten days prior to the hearing,
and
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as
advertised, namely 7:00 p.m., May 8, 1991, and continued to 7:00
p.m., May 22, in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before
the Planning Commission and said hearing was thereafter closed, and
WHEREAS, the Commission recertified EIR-89-10, with Statement
of Overriding Considerations, and associated Mitigation Monitoring
Program for Rancho del Rey SPA III. .
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE PIANNING COMMISSION
finds as follows:
Pursuant to Section 66473.5 of the Subdivision Map Act, the
tentative subdivision map for Rancho del Rey Sectional Planning
Area (SPA) III, Chula Vista Tract no. 90-02, is found to be in
conformance with the various elements of the City's General Plan
based on the following:
1. The site is physically suitable for residential
development and the proposal conforms to all standards
established by the city for such projects.
2. The design of the subdivision will not affect the
existing improvements -- streets, sewers, etc. -- which
have been designed to avoid any serious problems.
3. The project is in substantial conformance with the Chula
Vista General Plan Element as follows:
d/-;Jo1
a. Land Use - The proj ect is consistent with the
General Plan, El Rancho del Rey specific Plan and
the SPA III Plan which designates the property PC -
Planned community, with a variety of land uses and
residential densities.
b. Circulation - All of the on-site and off-site
public streets required to serve the subdivision
are consistent with the circulation element of
Chula vista General Plan and the circulation
proposed within the El Rancho del Rey Specific
Plan. Those facilities will either be constructed
or in-lieu fees paid in accordance with the Rancho
del Rey SPA III Public Facilities Financing Plan.
c. Housing - A low and moderate housing program with
an established goal of 5% low and 5% moderate will
be implemented subj ect to the approval of the
ci ty' s Housing Coordinator. Computation of the
satisfaction of this condition will include the
entire E1 Rancho del Rey Specific Planning Area.
d. Conservation and Open Space - The project provides
148.3 acres of open space, 36% of the total 404.9
acres. Grading has been limited on hillsides and
grading plan approval will require the revegetation
of slopes in natural vegetation. Approval of EIR-
89-10 included the adoption of a mitigation
monitoring program outlining the mitigation
measures required for project impacts on geology,
soils, biology, air, water, cultural resources,
land form, transportation and utility sources.
e. Parks and Recreation The project will be
responsible for the improvement of the 10 acre net
neighborhood park and payment of PAD fees or
additional improvements as approved by the Director
Parks and Recreation. In addition, a trail system
will be implemented through the south leg of Rice
Canyon, connecting with other open space areas.
f. Seismic Safety - The Rancho del Rey site is crossed
by the La Nacion Fault Zone which has one prominent
fault, running north to south, with other potential
traces. The mitigation monitoring program adopted
with EIR-89-10 provides for measures to be taken to
mitigate the impacts of development in association
with the fault zone.
g. Safety - The site will be within the threshold
response times for fire and police services. The
project will increase the need for additional
personnel, however, the city is planning to meet
31-~ /0
that need with additional revenues provided by this
project.
h. Public Facilities Element This project is
obligated in the conditions of approval to provide
all on-site and off-site facilities necessary to
serve this project. In addition to that, there are
other regional facilities which this project (
together with SPAs I and II) is contributing to,
including a public library site, fire station site,
and fire training facility site. The subdivision
is also contributing to the Otay Water District's
improvement requirements to provide terminal water
storage for this project as well as other major
projects in the eastern territories.
h. Noise - The units will be required to meet the
standards of the UBC with regard to acceptable
interior noise levels.
i. Scenic Highway - The project does not affect this
element of the General Plan.
j. Bicycle Routes - Bicycle paths are provided along
Telegraph Canyon Road, East "H" Street and paseo
Ranchero Road as shown in the circulation Element.
k. Public Buildings - No public buildings are planned
for the site. The project shall be subject to RCT
and DIF fees.
4. Pursuant to Section 66412.2 of the Subdivision Map Act,
the Commission certifies that it has considered the
effect of this approval on the housing needs of the
region and has balanced those needs against the public
service needs of the residents of the City and the
available fiscal and environmental resources. The
development will provide for a variety of housing types
from single family detached homes to attached single
family and senior housing. In addition, the addressment
to providing a percentage of low and moderate priced
housing is in keeping with regional goals.
5. The configuration, orientation and topography of the site
partially allows for the optimum siting of lots for
passive or natural heating and cooling opportunities.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION recommends
that the city Council approve the tentative subdivision map for
Rancho del Rey SPA III, Chula vista Tract 90-02 subject to the
following conditions:
31-~11
General/Preliminarv
1. The Public Facilities Financing Plan shall be followed with
improvements installed in accordance with said plan or as required
to meet threshold standards adopted by the City'of Chula vista.
In addition, the sequence in which improvements are constructed
shall correspond to any future East Chula vista Transportation
Phasing Plan adopted by the city. The city Engineer and Planning
Director may at their discretion, modify the sequence of
improvement construction should conditions change to warrant such
a revision.
2. All mitigation necessary to avoid significant effects itemized in
the Mitigation Monitoring Program for Environmental Impact Report
EIR-89-10 as required prior to Final Map approval, are hereby
incorporated as conditions of approval. The Director of Planning
may modify the sequence of mitigation at his discretion should
changes warrant such a revision.
3. The developer shall comply with the Community Purpose Facility
Ordinance. The areas proposed to show compliance with said
ordinance shall be provided prior to approval of the first final
map. Areas of consideration for qualification must be within the
areas of SPAs I, II or III. Amendment to the El Rancho del Rey
Specific Plan and Sectional Plan Areas may be necessary to
accomplish compliance.
4. Prior to final map approval for Phase 1, a Precise Plan shall be
approved by the city Council detailing the development of the
Specialty Housing project. The precise plan shall include but is
not limited to: detailing the density of the various portions of
the project; identifying the amount of recreational and open space
facilities; detailing the financial arrangements available to
proposed tenants; identifying the age limits and any income
requirements of tenants; and showing the percent of the project
for sale or rent.
Streets. Riqhts-of-Wav and ImDrovements
5. Prior to any final map approval for Phase 2 or 3 or any unit
thereof, the developer shall obtain all necessary right-of-way
for the construction of the unimproved off site portion of
East "J" Street west of Paseo Ladera, from River Ash Drive to
Red Oak Place.
6. The developer shall construct the unimproved off site portion
of East "J" Street west of paseo Ladera, from River Ash Drive
to Red Oak Place, to a Class II Collector Standard, except
that the 5 foot sidewalk may be asphalt concrete instead of
portland cement concrete. The construction of these
improvements shall be guaranteed prior to final map approval
for Phases 2 or 3 or any unit thereof. The subdivider may
request the formation of a reimbursement district for these
off-site improvements in accordance with section 15.50 of the
Municipal Code.
7. The developer shall request the vacation of that portion of
paseo Marguerita as necessary to accomplish the design as
3/- ,;J10l
shown on the tentative map.
accomplished prior to the approval
2, unit 3.
Said vacation shall be
of the final map for Phase
8. The off site portion of East "J" Street adjacent to Buena
vista Way shall be granted in fee to the City for Open Space,
public utilities and other public uses. The grant of this
property shall be completed prior to approval of a final map
for Phase 3, Unit 3. The developer shall enter into an
agreement to not oppose the inclusion of this property in Open
Space District # 20 (Zone 7) prior to approval of any final
map for Rancho del Rey SPA III. The developer shall be
responsible for the costs associated with annexing this
property to Open Space District # 20.
9. The developer shall be responsible for the construction of off
site improvements at the westerly end of paseo del Norte in
the Casa del Rey subdivision. The construction of these
improvements shall be guaranteed prior to approval of the
final map for Phase 2, unit 2. A cash deposit was previously
deposited with the City to pay the cost of this work. The
amount deposited is available to the developer for
construction of these improvements.
10. Prior to final map approval for Phase 1, the developer shall
dedicate additional right-of-way along the frontage of the
property on East "H" Street to provide a 20 foot parkway
(existing curbline to property line).
11. The developer shall be responsible for construction of a
sidewalk/recreational pathway along the entire frontage of
subj ect property on East "H" Street from Paseo Ranchero
westerly to Paseo del Rey to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer, Director of Planning and the Director of Parks and
Recreation. The construction of these improvements shall be
guaranteed prior to final map approval for Phase 1.
12. The developer shall be responsible for construction of an
expanded 8 to 10 foot wide sidewalk/recreational pathway along
the western side of Paseo Ranchero, to connect the trail
systems in the south leg of Rice Canyon and in the Telegraph
Canyon Road open space area. These improvements shall be
installed in conjunction with the construction phases of paseo
Ranchero specified in the Public Facilities Financing Plan.
13. The developer shall be responsible for the construction of
wider sidewalks at transit stops, subject to the approval of
the city Engineer.
14. The final design of paseo Ranchero shall include eight foot
wide landscape easement buffers as required by the Street
Design Standards or be adjoined by an open space lot at least
eight feet wide with slopes no greater than 5:1, except in the
following areas where the final design shall be subject to the
31 - ~/3
approval of the Planning Director, Landscape Architect and
City Engineer:
a. Adjacent to the lots fronting on Cabo Calabazo, Calle
Candelero and Punto Miraleste where a special slope and
retaining wall design will be implemented:
b. Along the Junior High School site:
c. Along the existing Ladera Villas and Mission Verde
subdivisions where existing conditions shall remain: and
d. Adjacent to the out-parcel owned by the Chula Vista
School District.
15. The final design of East "J" Street shall include 5.5 foot
wide landscape easement buffers as required by the Street
Design Standards or be adjoined by an open space lot at least
5. 5 feet wide with 5: 1 maximum side slopes, except in the
following locations where the final design shall be subject to
the approval of the Planning Director, Landscape Architect and
city Engineer:
a. Along the park site:
b. Along the two corner lots at the intersection of East "J"
Street and Camino Hiel (lots 82 and 97 of Phase 2, unit
1) and the southeast corner lot of East "J" Street and
Cabo Capote (lot 85 of Phase 2, unit 2):
c. Adjacent to the out-parcel owned by the Chula vista
School District: and
d. Along the existing Bel Aire Ridge subdivision where
existing conditions shall remain.
16. All retaining walls which interface with the public street
system shall be constructed to match the Ranch Rancho del Rey
SPA III Design Guideline standards for exterior walls.
17. The developer shall be responsible for construction of full
street improvements for all public and private streets shown
on the Tentative Hap within the subdivision boundary: and for
the construction of off-site improvements to construct Paseo
Ranchero, East "J" Street and paseo Ladera as shown on the
Tentative Hap, to the satisfaction of the city Engineer.
Said improvements shall include, but not be limited to,
asphalt concrete pavement, base, concrete curb, gutter and
sidewalk, sewer and water utilities, drainage facilities,
street lights, signs, fire hydrants and transitions to
existing improvements. Street intersection spacing as shown
on the tentative map is hereby approved.
.31-,;UY
18. All the streets shown on the Tentative Map within the
subdivision boundary, except private streets, shall be
dedicated for public use. Design of said streets shall meet
all city standards.
19. A temporary turnaround conforming to City standards shall be
provided at the end of streets having a length greater than
150 feet, measured from the center line of the nearest
intersecting street to the center of the cul-de-sac, except as
approved by the city Engineer.
20. CUl-de-sacs and knuckles shall be designed and built in
accordance with City standards unless otherwise approved by
the City Engineer.
Lot Confiauration
21. Frontage on all lots shall be a minimum of 35 feet at the
right-of-way line except as approved by the city Engineer.
This condition does not apply to flag lots, as defined in the
Municipal Code.
22. Lot lines shall be located at the top of slopes except as
approved by the city Engineer. When adjacent to open space
lots, property lines shall be located a minimum 2.5 feet from
the top of slope.
23. The preparation of final maps and plans for the locations
listed below shall be carried out in accordance with the
following criteria unless otherwise approved by the City
Engineer and Director of Planning:
a. Provide a minimum 50 feet from the corner of paseo
Ranchero and East "J" street to lots 6 and 7, Phase 3,
Unit 2, to provide additional buffer and transition area
at the corner.
b. Provide a pedestrian throughway between lots 130 and 131,
Phase 3, Unit 2, from Camino Calabazo to east "J" street
across from the school and park sites.
c. Lot 128 of Phase 2, Unit 1, shall be widened to a minimum
50 foot width to accommodate a combined slope and maximum
5 foot retaining wall. This is to avoid a "tunnel"
effect created at side lot lines.
d. Lots 3 and 5, Phase 2, Unit 3 shall utilize maximum 5
foot high retaining walls, and/or a combination of
retaining walls and crib walls.
e. Provide a different name for each of the portions of
Palazzo Court located to the east and west of East nJ"
street and the portions of Dorado Way located to the east
and west of camino Miel.
J I - ~/S
street Trees/Ocen Scace
24. The developer shall grant to the city street tree planting and
maintenance easements along all public streets as shown on the
Tentative Map. The width of said easements shall be as
outlined in the City's street Design Standards Policy.
25. The developer shall be responsible for street trees in
accordance with Section 18.28.10 of the Chula vista Municipal
Code. The use of cones shall be included where necessary to
reduce the impact of root systems disrupting adjacent
sidewalks and rights-of-way.
26. All open space lots adjacent to public rights-of-way shall
maintain a width so as to provide 10 feet of landscaping
treatment behind the back of sidewalk.
27. Maintenance of all facilities and improvements within open
space areas covered by home owners associations shall be
covered by CC&Rs to be submitted and approved by the Planning
Department prior to approval of the associated final map.
28. Prior to the approval of any final map, the developer shall
request in writing that maintenance of all facilities and
improvements within the open space area associated with such
map shall be the responsibility of the Rancho del Rey Open
Space Maintenance District.
29. Prior to approval of the first final map, a comprehensive
landscape plan shall be submitted for review and approval of
the City Landscape Architect and Director of Parks and
Recreation. Prior to approval of each final map,
comprehensive, detailed landscape and irrigation plans,
erosion control plans and detailed water management guidelines
for all landscape irrigation shall be submitted in accordance
with the Chula vista Landscape Manual for the associated
landscaping in that final map. These detailed landscape and
irrigation plans shall be for the review and approval of the
City Landscape Architect and Director of Parks and Recreation.
The landscaping format within the project shall be to
emphasize native, drought tolerant plant material. Exceptions
can be made for areas where reclaimed water is exclusively
used. The comprehensive landscape plans shall address:
a. Slope enhancement and landscape treatment for the slope
in Open Space Lot A, Phase 3, Unit 3, beneath the Junior
High School lot. The plan shall address and provide for
mature size plant material, boulder work and/or buttress
work on the slope.
b.
A naturalized revegetation program for areas
in open space lots, which may include
irrigation.
of grading
temporary
31 - cJ/(,
c. The disturbed "native" areas within Telegraph Canyon Road
open space corridor. This area shall include tree
groupings or tree groves. These plantings shall be
treated as random plantings and shall be identified in at
least six areas along the corridor with each location
providing plantings of 50 to 100 trees. The exact number
of trees and locations are to be approved by the Planning
Department and Department of Parks and Recreation. The
intent of these grove areas is to provide a consistency
with existing grove areas in the open space corridor west
of the Rancho del Rey SPA III area.
30. Prior to approval of the first final map, details showing the
location and design of the trail system and a sign program
shall be submitted to and approved by the Directors of
Planning and Parks and Recreation. The trail system in the
open space lots shall be a minimum 6 feet wide within an 8
foot horizontal clear space and a 10 foot vertical clear
space. The associated sign program shall identify the trail
network in the open space areas and connecting along Paseo
Ranchero, to the satisfaction of the Directors of Planning and
Parks and Recreation.
31. Prior final map approval for Phase 3, Unit 3 and Phase 4, Unit
2 as shown on the Tentative Map, cross sections shall be
submitted to and approved by the Director of Planning and City
Engineer illustrating the interface where the trail is located
adjacent to the drainage ditch along Telegraph Canyon Road.
The fencing of the drainage channel shall be aesthetically
pleasing incorporating the use of plantings, equestrian type
fencing and vinyl clad fencing. These cross sections and
decorative fencing program may be included with the
comprehensive landscape plan. Fence gates shall be provided
at locations approved by the city Engineer to allow
maintenance of the drainage channel.
Parks
32. The developer shall be obligated for 12.5 acres of parkland as
described in the approved SPA Plan, including land, and/or
fees, and/or additional improvements, in accordance with the
Parkland Dedication Ordinance. The actual final acreage will
relate to the number of units approved with the final maps.
33. The park located in Phase 3, Unit 4 shall be a minimum 10 net
useable acres. Design and development of the park shall be
subject to the approval of the City'S Director of Parks and
Recreation and shall conform with the park master plan to be
adopted by the City Council.
34. An adequate buffer and separation of 50 feet shall be provided
between the residential lots at the eastern end of Palazzo
Court and the existing park facilities, to the satisfaction of
the Director of Parks and Recreation. Solution may include
31-~1 r
but is not limited to relocating an existing tennis court or
lot redesign.
35. A minimum 20 foot wide access corridor shall be maintained at
the end of Paseo Palazzo where the cul-de-sac abuts the
existing park. Said area shall be made part of the park.
Detail and design of the access shall be submitted to and
approved by the Departments of Planning and Parks and
Recreation prior to final map approval for Phase 3, unit 1.
Gradina/Drainaae
36. An erosion and sedimentation control plan shall be prepared as
part of the grading plans.
37. Specific methods of handling storm drainage are subject to
detailed approval by the City Engineer at the time of
submission of improvement and grading plans. Design shall be
accomplished on the basis of the requirements of the
Subdivision Manual and the Grading Ordinance (No. 1797 as
amended). The developer shall submit calculations to
demonstrate compliance with all drainage requirements of the
Subdivision Manual.
38. Grading proposals shall be reviewed and approved by the city
Engineer and Director of Planning for consideration of
balanced cut and fill, utilization of appropriate soil types,
effective landscaping and revegetation where applicable.
Grading shall occur in separate phases unless a single phase
operation is approved with the grading plan.
39. A letter of permission for grading shall be obtained from
SDG&E prior to any grading within or adjacent to an SDG&E
easement or which would affect access thereto.
40. The developer shall make a reasonable effort to obtain
permission to grade the slopes along Buena vista Way at the
former intersection of East "J" Street. If permission to
grade said slope is not reasonably attainable as determined by
the city Engineer, the regrading of these slopes shall not be
required. The provisions of this condition shall be complied
with prior to approval of the final map for Phase 3, Unit 3.
41. Prior to approval of any final map for single family
residential use, the developer shall submit a list of proposed
lots indicating whether the structure will be located on fill,
cut or a transition between two situations.
42. Lots shall be so graded as to drain to the street or an
approved drainage system. Drainage shall not be permitted to
flow over slopes. Lots 71, 72 and 89 of Phase 2 Unit 1 shall
be designed so that there will be no negative grading or
drainage impacts to the adjacent off-site properties.
.J 1- ~I Y
43. Graded access shall be provided to all public storm drain
structures including inlet and outlet structures. Paved
access shall be provided to drainage structures located in the
rear yard of any residential lot or as approved by the city
Engineer.
44. The use of boulders in minor drainage basins and energy
dissipators in the canyon and open space areas in the manner
approved by the City Engineer and Planning Director, is
encouraged to allow water to be captured and to allow trees to
grow naturally.
Sewer
45. The developer shall be responsible for performing sewage flow
metering to monitor three segments of main identified in the
Rick Engineering report dated September 5, 1990 as sections
QR, XlX2 and KL. Metering shall be accomplished at the
locations determined by the city Engineer. Metering shall be
accomplished prior to the issuance of any building permit for
SPA III and be repeated at intervals directed by the city
Engineer. Should any of these segments have metered flows
which fill more than 80% of the pipe diameter, the applicant
shall construct parallel facilities as determined by the City
Engineer. The developer shall enter into an agreement with
the City prior to first final map approval providing for all
items indicated above.
46. An improved access road with a minimum width of 12 feet shall
be provided to all sanitary sewer manholes. The roadway shall
be designed for an H-20 wheel load or other loading as
approved by the City Engineer.
47. The developer shall obtain permission from the city to deposit
sewage in a foreign basin. The developer shall enter into an
agreement with the city relative to the diversion of sewage
prior to final map approval for any phase or unit thereof
proposing said diversion.
48. The developer shall be responsible for the removal of the
existing sewer pump stations (Mission Verde and Candlewood).
Prior to approval of any final map entailing said removal, the
owner and the City shall enter into an agreement to establish
the scope of work and the amount to be reimbursed by the City
to the subdivider for performing said work. The developer may
also request the formation of a special sewer service area to
provide for the cost of connection of the area currently being
served by the Candlewood pump station to the permanent gravity
sewer system.
Unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer, the scope of
work at both sites shall be limited to the removal and
disposal of equipment, grading, landscaping and construction
of new sewerlines and manholes required for connection to the
3/-01'"
proposed Rancho del Rey sewer system. Any upsizing of Rancho
del Rey Sewer lines due solely to the flow generated by the
Mission Verde and Candlewood areas shall also be included.
Reclaimed Water
49. Prior to approval of the associated final map, the developer
shall provide on-site infrastructure to accept and to use
reclaimed water when it is available, along Paseo Ranchero
from Telegraph Canyon Road to East "H" street and along East
"J" street from paseo Ranchero to the park site, per the
adopted Public Facilities Financing Plan.
50. Any costs incurred from retrofitting the reclaimed water
system, when reclaimed water becomes available, shall be paid
by the developer. Monies for this shall be held by the City,
through a deposit set up by the developer. The amount shall
be determined by the developer, approved by the city and in
place prior to approval of each associated final map.
Fire
51. Fire hydrants will be required per the Fire Department
standards. Hydrant spacing is 500 feet for single family and
300 feet for mUlti-family dwellings.
52. Maximum hydrant pressure shall not exceed 150 psi.
53. Fire hydrants and roadway access (per city Fire Marshall
approval) shall be installed, tested and operational prior to
any combustible materials placed on-site.
Aareements/Covenants
54. Prior to final map approval for Phase 1, Unit 1, the developer
shall enter into an agreement with the City to guarantee the
development of the parcel specifically for senior housing.
55. Prior to the approval of the first final map, the developer
shall enter into an agreement to provide a right turn lane at
the intersection of paseo del Rey and East "H" street, to the
satisfaction of the city Engineer, if the threshold standards
for this intersection as expressed in the then current Growth
Management Ordinance are exceeded at any time during the
development of this project.
56. Prior to approval of the first final map, the developer shall
enter into an agreement to provide a park-n-ride facility near
the intersection of East "H" street and paseo Ranchero to
include 50 parking spaces, 10 bicycle lockers, lighting, trash
receptacles and circulation striping to the satisfaction of
the city Transit Coordinator. In addition, a transit stop, to
include a bencn, shelter and trash receptacle, shall be
provided on the north side of East "H" street. A plan of said
a J - d~ 0
improvements and the timing thereof shall be submitted and
approved by the City Transit Coordinator.
57.
Prior to approval of each final map, copies of
CC&Rs for the subdivision shall be submitted
approved by the City Planning Department.
proposed
to and
58. Prior to approval of the first final map, the developer
shall provide a schedule, subject to the approval of the
Planning Director and City Housing Coordinator, for the
development of low income housing as defined in the
agreement executed between the city and Rancho del Rey
Partnership per City Council Resolution No. 15751 dated
August 7, 1990.
59. Prior to the approval of any final map for the subject
subdivision or any unit thereof, the developer shall
obtain all off-site right-of-way necessary for the
installation of required improvements for that unit. The
developer shall also provide easements for all on-site and
off-site public storm drains, sewers and other public
utilities prior to approval of the final map. Easements
shall be a minimum width of 6 feet greater than pipe size,
but in no case less than 10 feet.
60. The developer shall notify the City at least 60 days prior
to consideration of the final map by City if off-site
right-of-way cannot be obtained as required by the
Conditions of approval. (Only off-site right-of-way or
easements affected by section 66462..5 of the Subdivision
Map Act are covered by this condition.)
After said notification, the developer shall:
a. Pay the full cost of acquiring off-site right-of-way
or easements required by the Conditions of Approval
of the tentative Map.
b. Deposit with the City the estimated cost of acquiring
said right-of-way or easements. Said estimate to be
approved by the City Engineer.
c. Have all easements and/or right-of-way documents and
plats prepared and appraisals complete which are
necessary to commence condemnation proceedings.
d. If the developer so requests, the City may use its
powers to acquire right-of-way, easements or licenses
needed for off-site improvements or work related to
the Tentative Map. The developers shall pay all
costs, both direct and indirect incurred in said
acquisition.
The requirements of a, b, and c above shall be
accomplished prior to the approval of the Final Map.
.3 J - ~~ /
All off-site requirements which fall under the purview of
section 66462.5 of the State Subdivision Map Act will be
waived in accordance with that section of the Act if the City
does not comply with the 120 day limitation specified in that
section.
61. Prior to approval of each final map, the developer shall enter
into an agreement with the City to include the subdivisions in
the Mello Roos public facilities district or an acceptable
alternative financing program, subject to the approval of both
the Chula Vista Elementary and Sweetwater High School
Districts.
62. Prior to approval of each final map, the developer shall enter
into an agreement with the City wherein he agrees to comply
with that version of the Growth Management Ordinance in effect
at the time a building permit is issued. Such compliance
includes but is not limited to the then current East Chula
vista Transportation Phasing Plan.
63. Prior to final map approval for any phase or unit thereof, the
developer shall enter into an agreement with the City whereby:
a. The developer agrees that the City may withhold building
permits for any units in the subject subdivision if any
one of the following occurs:
1. Regional development threshold limits set by the
then current adopted East Chula vista
Transportation Phasing Plan have been reached.
2. Traffic volumes, level of service, public utilities
and/or services exceed the threshold standards in
the then effective Growth Management Ordinance.
b. The developer agrees that the City may withhold occupancy
permits for any of the phases of development identified
in the Public Facilities Financing Plan (PFFP) for Rancho
del Rey SPA III if the required public facilities, as
identified in the PFFP or as amended by the Annual
Monitoring Program have not been completed.
64. Prior to approval of each final map, the developer shall agree
to not protest the formation of a district for the maintenance
of landscaped medians and parkways along streets within and
adjacent to the subject property.
65. Prior to approval of each final map, the developer shall enter
into an agreement with the city wherein he holds the City
harmless for any liability for erosion, siltation or increased
flow of drainage resulting from this project.
31-';)c.)~
66. The developer shall enter into an agreement with the City
whereby the developer agrees to participate in the monitoring
of existing and future sewage flows in the Telegraph Canyon
Trunk Sewer and the financing of the preparation of the Basin
Plan and, pursuant to any adopted Basin Plan, agree to
participate in the financing of improvements set forth
therein, in an equitable manner. Said agreement shall be
executed by the developer prior to final map approval for any
phase or unit proposing to discharge sewage into the Telegraph
Canyon Trunk Sewer.
67. The developer shall permit all franchised cable television
companies ("Cable Company") equal opportunity to place conduit
to and provide cable television service for each lot within
the subdivision. The developer shall enter into an agreement
with all participating Cable Companies which shall provide, in
part, that upon receiving written notice from the City that
said Cable Company is in violation of the terms and conditions
of the franchise granted to said Cable Company, or any other
terms and conditions regulating said Cable company in the City
of Chula Vista, as same may from time to time be amended,
developer shall suspend Cable company's access to said conduit
until city otherwise notifies developer. Said agreement shall
be approved by the City Attorney prior to final map approval.
Fees/Pavments
68. The subject property is within the boundaries of Open Space
District #20 (Zone 7), Open Space District #10 (Phase II) and
Assessment District #87-1. Prior to final map approval or
other grant of approval for any phase or unit thereof, the
developer shall pay all costs associated with:
a) detachment of subject property from Open Space District
#10 (Phase II); and
b) reapportionment of assessments for open space District
#20 (Zone 7) and Assessment District #87-1 as a result of
subdivision of lands within the project boundary.
69. The developer shall pay:
a. spring Valley Sewer Trunk connection fees ($130/acre)
prior to final map approval for any phase or unit thereof
contributing flow to the spring Valley Trunk Sewer.
b. Telegraph Canyon drainage fees in accordance with
Ordinance 2384.
70. PAD fees shall be waived or modified as provided in the
adopted Public Facilities Financing Plan for Rancho del Rey.
RCT fees and DIF fees shall be paid in accordance with the
31-~;).3
applicable regulations. PAD fees shall be guaranteed until
such time as the city waives said fees.
Miscellaneous
71.
The boundary of
California System
the subdivision shall
Zone VI (1983).
be
tied
to
the
72. Prior to final map approval for any unit, the developer shall
submit a copy of said final map in a digital format such as
(DXF) graphic file. This Computer Aided Design (CAD) copy of
the final map shall be based on accurate coordinate geometry
calculations and shall be submitted on 5 1/2 HD floppy disk
prior to recordation of the final map.
73. The developer may file a master final map which provides for
the sale of super block lots corresponding to the units and
phasing or combination of units and phasing thereof, shown on
the tentative map.
If said super block lots do not show individual lots depicted
on the approved tentative map, a subsequent final map shall be
filed for any lot which will be further subdivided.
The City Engineer may condition approval of such a final map
to require necessary plans to provide infrastructure necessary
top meet City threshold policies and to conform to the
approved Public Facilities Financing Plan. All super block
lots created shall have access to a dedicated public street.
Bonds in the amounts determined by the city Engineer shall be
posted prior to approval of a master final map. Said master
final map shall not be considered the first final map as
indicated in other conditions of approval unless said map
contains single or multiple family lots shown on the tentative
map.
Code Reauirements
74. The developer shall comply with all relevant Federal, State
and Local regulations, including the Clean Water Act. The
developer shall be responsible for providing all required
testing and documentation to demonstrate said compliance as
required by the City Engineer.
75. The developer shall comply with all applicable sections of the
Chula vista Municipal Code as they exist at the time of
issuance of the building permit. Preparation of the final map
and all plans shall be in accordance with the provisions of
the Subdivision Map Act and the City of Chula vista
Subdivision Map Act and the City of Chula Vista Subdivision
Ordinances and Subdivision Manual.
,31 - ~d. If
.'
That a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the owners of
the property and the City Council.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA,
CALIFORNIA, this 22nd day of May, 1991, by the following vote, to-
wit:
NOES:
Commissioners Carson, Tugenberg, Grasser Horton, Martin, Decker,
and Fuller
None
AYES:
ABSENT: None
ABSTENTIONS: None
&ht~/b;?Md/J~~
Shirl rasser Horton
ATTEST:
~-'~ ?fc;OJ~~
Nancy Ri ey, S cret ry
3 I - 0)~5
RESOLUTION EIR-89-10 (f)
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING COMMISSION
AMENDING THE MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM FOR EIR 89-10,
RANCHO DEL REY SPA III
WHEREAS; the Planning Commission at its meeting of November 14, 1990,
voted 5-0 to recommend adoption of the Mitigation Monitoring Program for EIR
89-10, Rancho del Rey SPA III, and
WHEREAS; subsequent to its adoption, additional water conservation
measures and further mitigation of negative impacts to air quality were
required as well as new information regarding gnatcatcher mitigation and
vernal pool mitigation became available and the adopted Mitigation Monitoring
Program required correction and
WHEREAS; this new information was incorporated into an amended
Mitigation Monitoring Program which was presented to the Planing Commission at
its meeting of June 12, 1991,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION amends the
motion of November 14, 1990 to adopt the amended Mitigation Monitoring Program
for EIR 89-10.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
this twelfth day of June, 1991 by the following note, to-wit:
AYES:
Commissioners Carson, Tugenberg, Grasser-Horton, Martin,
Decker, Full er
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTENTIONS: None
ATTEST:
~."1 'K. ~ t~~
Nancy Ri ley, Slcreta y
WPC 9429P
.31 -01~ (.
U~~~~r"'rL~M !\ I! r:A. I'!l","~ ~":"'r
~'~;~,J~ 'ii:Ji,j -~L.u...-..:....:2 J\.t~LJU~u:",'
EXCERPT FROM PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF 6/12/91
ITEM 1:
CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO MITIGATION
MONITORING PROGRAM FOR EIR-89-10, RANCHO DEL REY SPA III
Associate Planner Reid stated that the Mitigation Monitoring
Program for Rancho del Rey SPA III was adopted at the same time of
the certification of the Final Supplemental EIR on November 14,
1990, by the Planning commission and in January 1991 by Council.
The changes included in the proposed Amended Mitigation Monitoring
Program included removal of all references to a specific EIR
consultant, correction of sections inconsistent with the EIR, and
more specific language regarding mitigation for gnatcatcher
habitat. Additionally, the Commission had received before the
meeting language including lerner pool litigation and monitoring to
be added.
Staff recommended that the Planning commission adopt the Amended
Mitigation Monitoring Program and recommend that Council adopt the
Mitigation Monitoring Program for Rancho del Rey SPA III.
Commissioner Tugenberg suggested that with the City moving east,
the city should possibly obtain an additional monitoring station
for air quality.
MSUC (Fuller/Decker) 7-0 that the Planning commission adopt the
Amended Mitigation Monitoring Program for the Rancho del Rey SPA
III and recommend that the Council adopt the Amended Mitigation
Monitoring Program.
.3 I - ';>;;J. -=J-
U"'~~, )'"";~~4"'l~ /'\!!
L,~ ~ ",~" __'" ,
U _., .... iiI .. ........-.l..,_._~
f./\ r'lri'-. "n (3yr-"l""""
-> ..,.:<<': r: ti '
'"i''''''' ",I(J !Ii L.~'
PC Minutes
-4-
May 22, 1991
EXCERPT FROM PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES OF 5/22/91
ITEM 2:
PUBLIC HEARING: A) RECERTIFICATION OF EIR-89-1O, RANCHO DEL
REY SPA III
B) CONSIDERATION OF WATER CONSERVATION PLAN FOR
RANCHO DEL REY SPAs II AND III;
C) CONSIDERATION OF AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN FOR
RANCHO DEL REY SPAs II AND III;
D) PCS-90-02; REQUEST TO SUBDIVIDE 404.9 ACRES KNOWN AS
RANCHO DEL REY SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA III, CHULA VISTA
TRACT NO. 90-02 LOCATED BETWEEN EAST 'H' STREET AND
TELEGRAPH CANYON ROAD, IMMEDIATELY SOUTH OF RANCHO DEL
REY SPA I, RANCHO DEL REY PARTNERSHIP
E) CONSIDERATION OF RANCHO DEL REY SECTIONAL PLANNING
AREA III DESIGN GUIDELINES;
F) CONSIDERATION OF AMENDED MITIGATION MONITORING
PROGRAM FOR EIR-89-1O, RANCHO DEL REY SPA III;
G) CONSIDERATION OF AMENDED CEQA FINDINGS FOR EIR-89-1O,
RANCHO DEL REY SPA III.
Associate Planner Barbara Reid stated the Final Supplemental EIR was certified by the Planning
Commission in November 1990 and by Council in January 1991. Since the recertification of
EIR-89-10 should occur prior to the tentative subdivision map being adopted, staff recommended
that the Commission recertify the EIR. Staff also recommended that items 'f and 'g' (the
Amended Mitigation Monitoring Program and the Amended CEQA Findings) be continued to
correct inconsistencies in the Amended Mitigation Monitoring Program, to incorporate a staff
meeting with developers which had been held and to be assured that the EIR consultant agreed
with those changes, to incorporate more specific language from a recommendation from the
U. S. Fish & Wildlife regarding the gnatcatcher protection, and ascertain that the CEQA
Findings as a result of these amendments reflect those. Ms. Reid noted that a letter had been
received from a resident west of the proposed project who was opposed to development in the
area; it was the Planning Department's opinion that it had been dealt with at the time of SPA
Plan approval.
Planning Consultant May discussed briefly a memo which had been given to the Commission
regarding the air and water plans, the tentative map, and the design guidelines. She stated the
..31 -<<~ t
PC Minutes
-5-
May 22, 1991
applicant had submitted to the Commission a letter stating their opposition to any amendments
to the water conservation plan. Ms. May noted that City Council had directed the zero net
increase in water use. She also said that an outcome of the air quality improvement plan
prepared for SPAs II and III was the suggestion of the park and ride facility to help limit
individual car trips and to encourage carpooling and bus ridership. The Transit Coordinator had
identified the need for a facility near the intersection of East "H" Street and Paseo Ranchero.
The developer is being required to provide the improvements for that facility. Ms. May stated
the applicant was opposed to the park and ride. Staff had discussed this further with the
applicant and recommended that condition no. 5 be moved to the agreement section beginning
with Condition no. 55 and be modified to require the applicant to enter into an agreement to
provide the facility. The precise language would be approved by the Transit Coordinator.
Staff recommendation was that the Commission take action on items 'a' through 'e' and
provisionally approve the project, pending the final action on items or and 'g', the Mitigation
Monitoring Program and the Modified CEQA Findings which would be brought back to the
Commission at a later date.
Commissioner Casillas asked for clarification of the impact of the policy statement on water
conservation going to the City Council, and why it was going to them after the Commission met
on the project currently before them.
Assistant Planning Director Lee answered that from staff s perspective and in fairness to the
applicant, this was the first project which had been required to come forward with an air and
water plan. In terms of timing, staff felt it was important. A memo had been provided to
Council advising them of staffs intent to move forward with a proposed outline of a program
for water policy that would be before Council on June 11. The Commission's recommendation
on this particular water program could be as definitive as the Commission wished. Staff
suggested consideration as a condition for the zero net increase. While this project could be
held until the Council moved ahead with their policy, staff didn't feel that would be equitable.
Commissioner Casillas felt the City would want to develop a good policy statement that applied
to everyone as to how to handle the water conservation. Ultimately, the policy statement may
come up with information that may not be valid as to a particular applicant.
Assistant Planning Director Lee concurred. He said that including the condition allowing the
project to proceed with the zero net increase would allow the applicant to proceed, and if the
Council wanted to soften that posture, they would have the opportunity to do so, or to qualify
their approval for the applicant to come back to have another opportunity to comply with an
overall City policy.
Commissioner Fuller asked if the staff s recommendation on the water policy had any input from
the County Water Authority as to a broader perspective of how our City's pian would tie into
a regional policy.
a I - 01~'
PC Minutes
-6-
May 22, 1991
Contract Planner Gray responded that there had not been the opportunity by City staff to explore
that with the County Water Authority at this point. The objective would be to coordinate any
kind of water policy that the Council may wish to pursue in Chula Vista with the County Water
Authority, Otay Water District, and Sweetwater. The Interagency Water Task Force had been
established with membership including the City, Sweetwater and Otay to provide that kind of
thrust and coordination on the water issue.
Commissioner Fuller suggested that staff use that approach in the presentation to Council. She
felt if the zero net increase and water policy were to be imposed on developers in our area, the
same restrictions should be imposed on other developers throughout the County.
Commissioner Decker asked if the policy hadn't fully evolved at the Council, how could we ask
the applicant to abide by it.
Assistant Director Lee said it was the Commission's choice. The applicant had presented a
water conservation program, and staff was making a recommendation that the zero net be
applied. It had been requested by Council, but the Commission was not required to take action
on the plan.
Commissioner Tugenberg asked about the equation for retrofitting.
Planning Consultant Gray answered that the technique was to reduce everything to gallons saved.
Parks and Recreation could calculate how many gallons of water could be saved by particular
sprinkler heads, moisture sensing type of irrigation system, etc.
Commissioner Tugenberg was concerned with the sites selected for the park and ride, and why
East "H" Street and Paseo Ranchero was chosen over the other suggested sites.
Transit Coordinator Gustafson said the primary reason Paseo Ranchero was one of the areas
chosen was because that location and the location to the west at Terra Nova Drive were two
major access points from Rancho del Rey to East "H" Street which would be a major corridor
for transit service. He explained why some of the other sites were not suitable.
Commissioner Tugenberg asked if there was consultation with the applicant. Assistant Planning
Director Lee answered that there had been consultation, but he thought the applicant was looking
at other options. Discussion followed regarding the potential sites which could be used, and the
security offered by them.
Commissioner Casillas felt Condition 57 was ambiguous.
Commissioner Carson asked if there would be some kind of adjustment to the developer if they
developed one place, and had to redevelop another place.
3/- ~ 30
PC Minutes
-7-
May 22, 1991
Assistant Planning Director Lee answered there would be. The applicant would not be required
to develop two sites.
Commissioner Martin commented about the church area being designated. He thought one of
the things Council wanted to do everything they could to have a multi-use parking area.
Commissioner Tugenberg suggested the Pilgrim Lutheran Church as a candidate for the park and
ride facility.
Transit Coordinator Gustafson said they were flexible. If an arrangement could be worked out
with the Church, it would make an ideal candidate because the parking lots are normally not
utilized during the week.
This being the time and the place as advertised, the public hearing was opened.
Craig Fukuyama, 2727 Hoover A venue, National City, representing Rancho del Rey Partnership,
objected to Conditions 5 and 57 dealing with the park and ride facility. They did not object to
their fair share obligation to meeting the needs of the park and ride facility, is committed to its
air quality plan, and felt it was a good idea to secure with the air quality provisions moving
forward through the County system that it would be a good idea. They objected to a finite
location being established and further study was necessary to arrive at an area that could be more
optimally located to serve a larger area. A development impact fee may be the way to equitably
share and spread costs for these types of facilities.
In addition, the applicant was opposed to the timing. They also objected to Condition 57, and
the zero net increase. He requested a workshop allowing the CIF and developers to participate
in a forum to discuss what the County is doing, and what other water solutions might be
available to help the City Council arrive at a water policy. He believed any commitment that
sought a zero net increase in their project in absence of that policy was inequitable. He
requested that the discussion of the water conservation plan, mitigation monitoring, and air
quality plan be deferred until Council policy is prepared and committed to. He asked for
approval of the tentative map, recertification of the EIR, and approval of the Design Guidelines.
Commissioner Fuller asked Mr. Fukuyama what his position was regarding the zero net policy.
Mr. Fukuyama answered they would prefer not to have the zero net increase applied to their
project, independent of a City-wide policy that would enact that.
Commissioner Casillas asked what impact the rebate program might have. Would it be
encouraged more in certain parts of the City.
Mr. Fukuyama thought it would. He read a letter from the Construction Industry Federation
as their statement of what was ongoing.
31-0l31
PC Minutes
-8-
May 22, 1991
No one else wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed.
Commissioner Decker asked that the air quality improvement plan be revisited after an
agreement had been reached between the applicant and staff.
MS (Tugenberg/Carson) to continue the item until such time as the City Council defmes its
policy regarding the zero water increment.
Commissioner Decker asked him to clarify. Commissioner Tugenberg said it would be item 2
in its entirety.
Commissioner Decker asked why the need to exclude 2a and 2d and 2e since they seem to be
rather straight forward and have nothing to do with water policy or agreement to set up a ride
and share facility.
Discussion ensued as to whether to delay the whole project or just the air and water conservation
plan.
Commissioner Tugenberg felt condition 57 was inequitable.
Assistant Planning Director Lee suggested modifying condition 5 as suggested by Planning
Consultant May that prior to the first final map an agreement be reached with the applicant;
condition 57 could be excluded. The final agreement could be brought back for ratification by
the Planning Commission.
Commission Carson said that if Mr. Lee's wording for condition 5 that there be an agreement
reached before the final map was accepted, condition 57 would be deleted. She could go along
with that. The whole thing could go ahead and be processed.
Commissioner Tugenberg withdrew his motion and Commissioner Carson withdrew her second.
AMENDED MOTION
MS (Tugenberg/Casillas) 7-0 that the Planning Commission accept item 2(a),(b), (c), (d) with
the deletion of condition 57 and the rewording of condition 5, and (e) contingent upon the
Planning Commission's subsequent approval of (f) and (g).
Assistant Planning Director Lee asked if there was a particular statement or direction the
Planning Commission wished staff to carry forward to the City Council when the map moved
forward, or if they desired to have those plans brought back before the Commission after the
Council had adopted a policy.
31 - .;J..3 ~
PC Minutes
-9-
May 22, 1991
The Commissioners asked that the plans be brought back; Commissioner Tugenberg said he
would like to see the Council make every effort possible to expand this program into a
countywide or regional program; Commissioner Carson said she believed in zero net increase.
Commissioner Decker said he would like some workshops opened regarding air and water.
Commissioner Tugenberg was concerned that if the credit for off-site retrofit is to be only in the
General Plan area, there may be a time that the City would run out of retrofit in order to
accommodate the new housing.
Assistant Planning Director Lee concurred that it was a real issue.
Commissioner Casillas asked if it was conceivable to develop a plan that gave credit for saving
water outside the City limits; could there be a program where someone outside the City could
sell their credits to the City--similar to a tax credit.
Mr. Lee agreed it could possibly be done, and had been done between districts.
Commissioner Decker requested that the Commission revisit the Air Quality Improvement Plan
as soon as there was some kind of reasonable agreement between the applicant and staff.
Ed Elliott, Executive Vice President of Development Engineering for McMillin, said he was
currently serving on several committees involving the issue. The Governor's plan was to study
water marketing; find the sources; move them around the state through their system; and develop
a credit system. He went on to explain some of the other issues.
3/- .;) .33
EXCERPT FROM MINUTES OF PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION
MEETING OF 3/21/91
b. Ranoho del Rev SPA III
Jack Nakawatase of ONA, Inc. presented the Rancho del Rey SPA
III Park Plan.
Commissioner Willett expressed concern about the lack of
parkinq on the south side of the park near the ballfields. In
addition, he was concerned about the traffic flow throuqh the
school/park area and lack of an emerqency access to the field
area.
Chair Sandoval-Fernandez feels that we should encouraqe the
ball players to walk by placinq a bicycle rack near the fields
rather than have the parkinq lot be a focal point of the area.
Commissioner Lind feels that the lack of a road around the
field area could hamper the access of emerqency vehicles
durinq ballqames.
Motion to accept the concept plan as presented but recommend
that consideration be qiven to puttinq another road through
the park.
The Commissioners discussed the pros and cons of having
parkinq in the field area. In addition, they questioned why
the fields were not beinq liqhted.
Director Valenzuela stated that the plan would come back to
the Commission at the various staqes of development and the
issue of liqhtinq could be addressed at some future date.
MSC WILLETT/LIND 4-0
..il -..,)3 JI
.
I.
,
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ,
This document is a Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) which
addresses the proposed Rancho del Rey Sectional Planning Area (SPA) III project.
This SEIR should be read in conjunction with the previously prepared Final EIR
(EIR-83-2). The project applicant, Rancho del Rey Partnership, is proposing
development of the third phase (SPA III) of the El Rancho del Rey Specific Plan.
The first and second phase of the project, SPA I and SPA II, are currently under
construction.
The El Rancho del Rey Specific Plan ,area encompasses approximately 2,450 acres
located east of Interstate 805, south and west of Otay Lakes Road, and north of
Telegraph Canyon Road in the City of Chula Vista. SPA III consists of a detailed
plan for residential development, com~unity facilities, and park and open space
uses on approximately 405 acres located southeast of East H Street and north of
Telegraph Canyon Road. The SPA III Plan is in conformance with the overall
specific plan. Included within the provisions of the El Rancho del Rey Specific
Plan is a mechanism to transfer density from one category to another as a part of
the SPA Plan approval process. The density transfer will involve the transfer of
171 residential units within the SPA III project area. The approval of SPA III will
include the SPA III Plan, a tentative map, a Public Facilities Financing Plan,
Design Guidelines, a Development Agreement, and a Specific Plan Amendment for
density transfers and park acreage additions. The elimination of the East J Street
link connecting Paseo Ranchero and Buena Vista will require a Specific Plan and
General Plan Amendment.
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Rancho del Rey SPA III Plan proposes the construction of 1,380 single-family
dwelling units (DU) ranging in density from from 3.8 to 10.6 DUlac on eight
residential parcels on approximately 206 acres. Included among the planned
dwelling units are 583 DUs of specialty housing on approximately 85 acres for a
small retirement community which will be composed of detached and attached
housing. In addition, a junior high school site totalling 24.7 acres, a neighborhood
S-l 3/-.;3$
park totalling 10.0 acres, eight open space areas totalling 147.6 acres, and major
circulation routes totalling 1.3.7 acres are proposed.
The environmental analysis performed for the proposed project includes the
following issues: geology/soils, drainage/groundwater/water quality, land-
form/aesthetics, air quality, biology, cultural resources, transportation/access,
land use/general plan!zoning, community social factors, community tax structure,
parks/recreation/open space and public services. The EIR includes an analysis of
project conformance with the City's Threshold Policy standards for fire, police,
sewer, water, parks/recreation and drainage. All of the threshold standards are
met.
ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
Geology/Soils
Development of the proposed project will involve grading of ridge-tops and filling
of canyons and side slopes. Soils such as the San Diego Formation are susceptible
to erosion. Although the La Nacion Fault traces cross the western portion of the
site, they are not considered active. Most of the required excavations can be made
by conventional heavy grading equipment. The geotechnical report identifies
detailed grading and earthwork recommendations. The geotechnical consultant
would monitor grading to confirm that field conditions are consistent with the
conditions predicted by the preliminary investigations.
Drainage/Groundwater/Water Quality
The proposed project will result in additional impervious surface are,! which will
increase surface water runoff rates. Development of the site will result in a
change in the type and amount of contaminants contained in surface runoff. This
represents a cumulative impact to local water quality. Existing drainage facilities
are sufficient to handle runoff from the project and no mitigation or monitoring is
necessary. Potential impacts to groundwater/water quality would be reduced to
below a level of significance through adherence to the regulations of the National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit for storm water discharge.
S-2 JI -.)3.1.
Landform/ Aesthetics
Development of SPA III would significantly alter landforms on-site and" create
manufactured slopes of approximately 50 feet. These are considered significant
landform and visual impacts. Grading would primarily be confined to the ridge-top
areas, with the major canyon areas retained as open space. The degree of visual
alteration is consistent with what was anticipated when the specific plan was
approved. Grading associated with the project will be in conformance with the
general grading slope bank standards set forth in the SPA III Plan. Implementation
of the community design guidelines would partially reduce significant impacts.
They include landscaping, fencing design, community signing, lighting, and parking
design/street furniture.
Air Quality
The development of the proposed project would result in increased traffic on new
and existing roadways as well as additional air emissions and would result in
cumulative impacts to the San Diego Air Basin. The project will be in conformance
with the forthcoming State Implementation Plan (SIP) which is based on Series VII
population projections. Short-term emissions from construction activities would
generate dust and diesel emissions resulting in short-term emissions impacts.
Emissions from residential activitiy and from the Junior High school site including
the use of paint, industrial strength cleaners, fumigation, barbecues and gasoline
powered lawnmowers are not considered significant on a project level, but would
have cumulative impacts to regional air quality. To reduce potential impacts to air
quality the use of mass transit and bicycles within the project would be facilitated,
and recommended actions to prevent the development of pollution "hot spots" at
intersections would be implemented.
Biology
Implementation of Rancho del Rey SPA III as proposed would result in significant
impacts to coastal sage scrub (on a local and regional basis), vernal pools,
C~lifornia gnatcatchers, cactus wren, and snake cholla. Impacts to the coastal
sage scrub community would also include losses of sensitive plants such as the San
Diego barrel cactus and ashy-spike moss. In addition to the California gnatcatcher
S-3
.31- ~3T
and cactus wren, impacts to the orange-throated whip-tail,the coast cholla, and
the San Diego horned lizard may result. With implementation of the proposed
mitigation and monitoring measures, significant impacts to biology would not be
reduced to below a level of significance.
Cultural Resources
Two archaeological sites located on the SPA 1II property have been identified as
significant cultural resource sites and contain evidence which can address the
question of the presence of early man in San Diego. The development of the
proposed project would significantly impact these sites. The implementation of an
extensive mitigation and monitoring program would reduce impacts to the sites to
below a level of significance. The mitigation program has been completed and
approved by the City. All impacts have been reduced to a level below significance.
Transportation
The proposed project is expected to generate 11,405 ADT. All intersections
relevant to the project will operate at LOS C or better in the morning and
afternoon peak hours under buildout conditions with the exception of the East H
Street/Paseo del Rey intersection. This intersection will operate at a LOS D
during the afternoon peak period but not for greater than two hours and thus would
be within the limits of the City of Chula Vista's Threshold Policies for traffic.
Potentially significant impacts would be mitigated to below a level of significance
with implementation of the proposed mitigation.
Land Use
The Rancho del Rey SPA 1lI Plan as proposed, is in conformance with the land use
policies and plans of the City of Chula Vista, the EI Rancho del Rey Specific Plan,
and with existing and proposed land uses in the vicinity of the project site.
Development of SPA 1II would not result in significant land use impacts and
mitigation/monitoring is not necessary.
S-4
$/-:>.38
Community Social Factors
No potential adverse impacts regarding community social factors are associated
with the development of the proposed plan. Impacts to population, housing, and
employment are consistent with the EI Rancho del Rey Specific Plan. No
significant impacts would be associated with the proposed project; no mitigation or
monitoring measures are necessary.
Community Tax Structure
Implementation of the proposed Rancho del Rey SPA 1Il would result in a net fiscal
benefit of approximately $64,800 annually to the City of Chula Vista; therefore no
adverse impacts would result to the community tax structure. No mitigation or
monitoring measures are required.
Parks, Recreation and Open Space
As part of the proposed project, a 10.0-acre neighborhood park would be developed
on-site. A large portion of the site (36%) would be dedicated as open space.
Although the park does not meet the required acreage as set forth in the City's
parkland ordinance, upon meeting the conditions established by the City, the
project would not significantly impact Parks, Recreation and Open Space. As a
condition of approval of the tentative map, City' staff would ensure that conditions
for the 10.0-acre park have been implemented.
Public Services
The 1989 Water Allocation Report distributed by OWO limits the number of new
dwelling units that can receive water in one year. The receipt by the City of Chula
Vista of a service letter from the OWO regarding the proposed project would allow
the project to meet the Threshold Standards related to water, and potential
impacts would be reduced to below a level of significance. Oue to the regional
shortage of water, the project proponents would work with the City of Chula Vista
to develop a project level water conservation program to reduce water consump-
tion. The development of on-site sewage facilities consistent with the 1986 sewer
study would provide adequate infrastructure to accommodate project flows. The
5-5
.f I - _ ~ 39
City of Chula Vista has a surplus of contract capacity in the METRO sewage
system and no significant impacts are anticiapted. SDG&E would provide utility
services to the project site and there would be no impacts associated with the
provision of utilities. The proposed project would be served by the Chula Vista
Police Department. Development of the project would significantly impact police
protection from the development of the proposed project; however, the addition of
4.6 police personnel would reduce impacts to below a level of significance.
Emergency fire and medical protection would be supplied in compliance with the
Threshold Policy and no significant impacts are anticipated. Both the Sweetwater
Union High School District and the Chula Vista City School District are involved in
the planning and construction of new facilities which would provide adequate
facilities for the additional students generated by the project. Project related
impacts to schools would be mitigated through the phased implementation of
additional facilities in eastern Chula Vista. The two MeIJos Roos Community
Facilities Districts, (Sweetwater Union High School District Community Facilities
District No. 3 and the Chula Vista City Schools Facilities District No.3) will
provide tax moneys directly to the school districts for implementation of their
long-range development plans.
S-6
3/ - .J 410
Table 5-1
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES SUMMAR Y
Issue
Monitoring
Impact
Mitigation
Geology/Soils
Drainage/
Groundwater/
Water Quality
Landform/
Aesthetics
Air Quali ty
Potential impact
from proximity to
La Nacion Fault
zone.
Potential impacts to
groundwater/water
quality from runoff.
Significant alteration
of on-site landforms.
Significant impacts
to landform and visual
quality.
Cumulative impacts
to regional air
quality
Adherence to Uni-
form Building Code
would reduce impacts
to below a level of
significance.
Adherence to NPDES
permit regulation
for stormwater
discharge would
reduce impacts to
below a level of
significance.
Grading would con-
form with standards
established in
SPA 111 Plan.
Implementation of
community design
lines would par-
tially reduce level
of impacts to land-
form and visual
quality.
Adherence to SIP
regarding local
participation in
air emission re-
duction measures,
encourage use of
alternate transpor-
tation, and accom-
modate mass transit
vehicles in front of
retirement community
would partially re-
duce cumulative
impacts.
S-7
3/-OJ"/
Prior to building
permit issuance,
geotechnical recom-
mendations would be
made a condition of
the tentative map.
Prior to issuance of
the occupancy permit,
the City would ensure
that the project is in
'. conformance with
NPDES regulations.
Prior to or as a con-
dition of tentative
map approval, grading
plans would be inspec-
ted by Planning and
Building departments
to ensure that grading
standards have been
adhered to.
Prior to or as a con-
dition of approval
of the tentative map,
City staff would
ensure that recom-
mended mitigation
measures have
been implemented.
Table 5-1 (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES SUMMAR Y
Issue Impact Mitigation Monitoring
Biology Si-gnificant impacts Quali fied biologis t Prior to or as a con-
to coastal sage to monitor en- dition of the grading
scrub, California croachment of open permit, tentative and
gnat catchers, cactus fill slopes. Re- final map approval,
wren and snake vegetation of the City Planning De-
cholla. coastal sage scrub partment would ensure
nati ve species on that recommended
manufactured s mitigation measures
slopes. Trans- have been imple-
plant program for mented.
cactus. Monitoring
program for Calif-
ornia gnatcatchers.
Acquisition of land
for a preservation
of gnatcatcher and
vernal pool habitat.
Cultural Significant Implementation of Prior to or as a con-
Resources impacts to two extensive recovery dition of tentative
resource si tes. program would reduce map approval, City
impacts to below a staff would ensure
level of sig- that recommended
nificance. mitigation measures
have been
implemented.
Transportation Potentially signi- Mitigation Annual monitoring
ficant impacts of measures proposed program as directed
the proposed project for buildout include by City Transpor-
would be mitigated signalization, re- tation Department.
to below a level of configuration to Other site specific
significance with provide dual lanes, measures will be
implementation of construction of new made conditions of
the proposed miti- road segments, and of Tentative Map and
gation. placement of stop Public Facili ties
signs. Finance Plan.
Land Use None None None
Community None None None
Social Factors
S-8
31 -';;l/~
Table 5-1 (Continued)
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSEQUENCES SUMMAR Y
Issue
Impact
Mitigation
Monitoring
Community
Tax Structure
Parks!
Recreation!
Open Space
Public
Services
None
Potential impacts due
to net deficiency of
of 2.6 acres of
parkland.
Potential impacts
to water, fire pre-
vention, police and
schools.
None
None
Addition of amenities Prior to or as a con-
in proposed park and dition of approval of
utilization of ad- the tentative map.
jacent junior high City staff would en-
school site would re- sure that conditions
duce impacts to parks. for the IO.O-acre park
Park would also meet have been imple-
conditions estab- mented.
lished by the City.
Would reduce impacts
to below a level of
significance.
The receipt of a
service letter
from the OWD would
reduce potential
impacts to water to
below a level of
significance. The
addition of another
Fire Inspector would
reduce impacts to
fire p,revention to
below a level of
significance. The
addition of 4.6
police personnel
would reduce impacts
to police to below
a level of sig-
nificance.
S-9
Prior to building
permit issuance
City staff would
ensure that the
project proponent
has received a
water service
availability letter,
has entered an agree-
ment with the City of
Chula Vista to provide
an additional Fire
Inspector and 4.6
pollee personnel, and
entered into the
Mello Roos for school
facilities.
~ I - ~ '13
Table S-2
SUMMARY OF ALTERNATIVES
ISSUE
ALTERNATIVE DESIGN 2
NO PROJECT/EXlSTING SPECIFIC PLAN
ALTERNATIVE DESIGN I
.Projecl Description
Geo!ogy/SOils
/. DrainolfiOrouncI-
"'waler/Walcr Quality
'"
,
iJ
-t Landform
~ Allcl>liool
" Aesthetics
DeYcJopmcnt would be based upon the existing General Develop-
ment Plan for Rancho del Rey SPA Ill. Jncludes a maximum
potential development of 1,380 du's consisting of single (..mily-
conventional (2-4 DU/ac), single family and specially housing (4-6
DUlac) and IOwnhouses (6-8 DUlac). This allernative also includes
a 23.0 aae school site and a 2.0 acre p:ut. A density trnnsfer 0( 9S
residential units as proposed in the SPA III plan would nol occur.
East J Street would be extended 10 its (uD General Plan length wilh
Ihis aIlemalive.
Impocts 10 G<oIogy/SO~s would be lhe same :IS lhe proposed
project. The si'" cuuld be suhject 10 rnodeI1Itc-lo-severe ground-
sh:1kin1 in the Cvetll of a map carlhquake on lhe Coron.-.do Banks.
Rose Canyon. or Elsinore Faull$.
Polenlial impacU 10 Drainago,oUroundwaler/Wa... QuaIity would
be similar' 10 the proposed project. This Waler Quality allcmative
wiD create large areas of impervious ground slBface with lhe over-
all errect of facilitaling water runoff durina rainy periods. An
increase in urban pollutants would resulL No signifanl impacts 10
Drainago,oUroandwaler/Wa... Qua1ity would occur.
Dwelling units ningc from 7so..1.380 uniu with density opportuni-
lies rnnging from 3-11 du'S/:K: on approximately 160 dcvctop.,blc
acres. Allowable uses within this design include single family
dweUing~ventional, cottages, lownhouses. specialty housing,
open space, school., and parts. Developmenl in Areas A and E
would be eliminated, leaving Ihcse areas in nalW'31 open space. Easl
J Street would not be CJllended 10 ils full General Plan lenglh and
would be designed as :l cul-ctc.sae SUt:et. This allemalive would
reduce imp:tC1s 10 biological and cultural rcsoorces,landfonn alter-
ation, and part/rtaeation and open space.
Potential a>nsIrainls ....cialcd with geologie and soils resoun:es
would be somewhal reduced with the climinalion or grading in
AJeas A and E. PoIenlially significant impac:1s from lround sh.1king
would -be reduced with Area A left in open space. . POIenli:J1
surficial erosion and instabilily would not resull in An:::I A with
inc:orponlion of lhis allernative. A ICO"lcchnical analysis would be
_ired 10 detennine appropriate mi6gation m........
Land ~ with Ihis a1temali.. would resuII in .. increase
.in waler impervious surfaces and poIenIiaI impacls "10 on-SilC waler
quality and quanlily may f'CSUIL Eliminalioo of development in
Area. A and E would reduce lhe amount of urban pollutanlS and
impervious _ surfaces associated.
Impocts to I....form IIIClllliooVaeslhe would be essen6ally the Impocts 10 Iandfomo alleration would be reduced AII....ion ..ilb a
..... u tbe.--.l projec~ wilb lhe exception or addi60nal grad- fewer number of building pads tequired overalL Elimination of
ins required. (or the extension of East J SIreet wilh Ihis a1lema1ive. development in __ A and E would miuce impacls 10 visu.,.
quality. ImpaelS 10 landform aesthetics are considered adverse bul
substantially reduced from lhe JlfOIlOS'd project wi1h lhis aller-
native.
. No ProjedJNo r;>evdopmenl Allemltive was DOl summarized in Ibis lable
Dwelline units ranee from 894-1380 units wilh density oppoduni-
ties ranging from 3-11 du's/ac 00 IJIIlI'Olimalley 200 developoble
areas. Developmenl in Area A would be diminaleel, leavinllhis
.... in ..,uta! open space. Area Eo originaUy JllUIX*<I as open
space in tho proposed project, would have Optimal developable
uses ineludinl single f:mily dweUinl-convenlional. COllages.
lownhouses and special'y. East J Stseel would ... be extended 10
ilS (ull General Plan length and wooW be desilncd as :I cuI.-de-sac
sIrcet. This allemalive wooW reduce impcu to bioIo&icaI raoun:-
es. lanctrorm aher.Uion, Md parb'recn:ation and open space.
Pocential consIrainls associated wilh geoIoeic and soils resourc:a IS
i_ir...s in the proposed project would be some..... reduced with
Ihe elimination of cmdin& in Arta A. Adoption of Ihis allcmalive
would reduce poICRlially siJflirrcanl imp;ICIS due 10 ground sh....dlll
in An:a A. PoIential surfkial erosion and insWriJily would nor
resull in Area A. Slope fail.... mayoceur in Area D if developed.
A geoIec!tnical analysis woo!d be rflquUedeo determine Ippt"OpriIlc
miligalion measures.
f
I
Land development with this altemalive would result in an incrasc
in the impervious smfx:es. and potential impaclS 10 on-silC walct
qtJ."llily and quantity may result Elimination of developmenc in
Area A would reduce Ihe ImOURI of'urban pollutants and impervi-
ous surfaces mociated.
Impacts to landforin alteration would be reduced wilh . fewer
number of buildin& pads n:quired overall. Elimiruuion of develop-
menl in Area A would Ieduce imp.:1s 10 visual quality. Impacts 10
Iand(Of1l1/aesthelies are considered adverse. bul subslanlio1lJy
_ from lhe JlfOIlOS'd project wich Ibis al......ive.
SolO
f
--"I
",,~>....,..j
H''''
'j.,. ...,
Table S.2
SUMMARY OF ALTERNATIVES (Continued)
-
ISSUE
ALTERNATIVE DESIGN 2
NO PROJECTIEXlSTINO SPECIFIC PLAN
ALTERNATIVE DESIGN I
. Air Qualily
BiololY
CullwaJ Resoun:es
<u
......
, T..........1ion
tJ
~
ImpadJ to air quaJ~y woold be Ihe _ as Ihe proposed project.
The development of this alternative would resuh in incre..,sed lraCfic
on new and aistinl roadways and additional air emissions, and
would result in cumulativa impacts to regional_ quality.
ImpadJ to bioIoaY woold be amiIII' to the proposed project.
ImpadJ to ~ .... scrub. CaliComia paIClltchen. _us W1<IlS
and snake cholla IIJ'C considered signiflCalll and unmiligable.
ImpadJ to cui.... resources woold be similar to lhose 01 lhe
proposed project. This allemative would have significanl impacls
on two archaeological sileS. Miligation measures of a similar
magnitude IS identifJCd in the proposed project would be required. .
This altema1ive would result in ami.. tramc: impoclS 10 lhe
proposed project. Adoption of Ihis allernative would resull in the
full extensiOn of East J Sueet 10 Buena Vista Way according 10 (he
General Plan No sianirlcanl impacts 10 tnJn.~"lion would re.'lult
wilh adoption of this allernative..provided thai milipion measures
as discussed Cor the proposed project '"" implemcn'ed.
Decreased tnarrlC volumes would decrease project emissions:' Dccn:ased traffic volumes would decrease projected emissions;
however, cumulative imp3ds 10 regional air qualily woukl n:sull. however. cumubtive impacts 10 recionallir qu:alily would result.
This aloemati.. _lei ....h in ....... IIllOUnts 01.......... open
space with the climination of development in areas A and E.
Approximat~ly seven California gnalcalcher habilals would be
preserved. as well JS IfC'Ier than SO" of lhc Diepn coaslal sage
scrub oo-site. nis alternative is considered the biolOCic.lIly
preferred allernative and would result in a significant reduction of
impacts to biology, if mitigation measures similar 10 the proposed
project are implemented.
AcIoptioo of this aUem:uive would re:suk in rdluced impaclSlo
archacologic:al sile SUi 96C:t1J61. Impacts to cullural resources arc
"considered signifant wilh &his alternative. Implementation of lhe
proposed miligation would reduce potential impacts to below a
level of signifICanCe.
Adoption of &his alternative would result in I pou:nliaUy lower
number of ADTs Ihan the proposed projecl. East J Slrecl would
not be developed 10 its fulllenglh per lhe Cirt:ulal.ion Elemenl 01
lhe Genernl Plan. Impacts 10 lhe regional circularioo network would
be similar. Miligalion measures of a similar magnitude as idcnlified
in the projJOScd project _lei be I<quiled.
This aI......he _....11 i. area'" IIIIOUIIlS or...- open
sp:x:e wilh the diminalion 01 cIe-Idopment in ...... A. Appro.i.
maldy fi.. Cal[omia InaltalCher habi.... woolel be ......-1. ..
weD as approximately 40% of the Diegan ooastaI sage scrub 00-
sile. Portions of cxlUS wmt habitat and snake cholla would be
preserved with &his altemalive.This altemalive is cons~ lhe
biologically prefened 1I11emo11ive. Adoption orthis alternative would
result in .impacts that 1ft considered signiflcanl. and partially
mitipble. if mitipion rncuwes similar 10 those discussed in lhe
proposed project.. implemented.
AdopIion cllhis ........i.. _ ....... in simk impaclS 10
sll"irlCllll cuhural .- as lhose idenlirocd Cor lhe. proposed
project; Impacts 10 cullural. resources with this ~temalive are
repded as sll"iroc...lmplcmcnlation 0I1he JlfDPlS'd mitiplion
identirlCd widt lhe proposed project woold reduce Impacts 10 lhe
sites 10 below :II 1eYd of signifance.
Adoption or IIUs _.. would ....h in . "","'Iially -
number 01 ADTs ..... the proposed project. Eas11 Stn:e, would
not be .....Ioped 10 tis Culllenlth per lhe Cueal";... Elemcnl of
lhe General Plan. Imp;ICIS to lhe rqional circulation network' would
be sUnilar. Miliplion mea5UR:1 of a similar magnilude as idenlified
in the proposed projc<t _Id be I<quiled.
S-1I
;1
ISSUE
Land U~I
PIanIZoninJ
Communily Social
Factors
~
-
I
Community Tax
Slructure
tJ
-t.
I'
NO PROJECTIEXISTINO SPECIFIC PLAN
L.'Uld Use is in confonn:mce with the S"p(:ciftc Plan~ No imp.lelS
to boo use would result with the adoption of Ihis allem..1Iivc.
Adoption of this. alternative would result in similar impacts to
the proposed project. No signifICant impacCs 10 c:ommunit)' soci."
(actors would result with this alternative.
ImpadS 10 community tax structure would be similar 10 ahose
of (he proposed project. As a result. this alternative wold h:ave :m
overall positive rlSCal impact on the at)' of Chuta Vista. No
3dvene impaclllo community lax struCture would result with Ihis
alternative.
,..,'.
Table S-2
SUMMARY OF ALTERNATIVES (Continued)
ALTERNATIVE DESIGN I
Development of Ihis alternative would be consislent with surround~
in, land uses and with Use current General Plan on a plan~I01llan
level. On a plan-Io-ground level. this allcm:llive, would reduce
intrusion inlo steep slopes and reduce the destruction or sensitive
biological n:soun:es in Areas A and E. Adoption of Ihis akemative
would not be in conformance with &he adopted Rancho del Rey
SpecifIC Plan. Imp3CtS 10 land use would DOl be considered si&riifi-
cant wilh implementation of this design alternative.
This allemative would generate fewer or an equal amount of people
based on density opportunities. PqNlaaion generaled with this
altc:mative would not exceed growth CJCpectation as oullined in the
ERDR Spceirlc Plan Amendment; therefore. no adverse population
impacts are anticipated. Implementalion of Ihis allem:uive woukl
anow for Ihe devclopmenr. of up 10 1,380 units on' approxim:llely
160 acres. DeveIopmenI or lhis allemative as proposed would nol
be consislent with lhe adopIed plan. No employmenl opportunilies
would be generaled by lite allemative. No significan~ impacls 10
community social radars would result with this allemative.
Jmplementaiion !llhis alternative would result in afewcr Of equal
number of residential units being consIRlCted. It is unknown what
lhe impact would be to t~ Cily of Chub Vista.
"''''-'' ., .....-.......,.
~
ALlERNATIVE DESIGN 2
DevdopmellI ollila lI......i.. wouId be _ wilh surmnl-
inl land .... and wilh lhe tunall GcncraIPIan on . pIan-lo-pIan
JeveI, On. pian.........., Ieod. this .hemal;", wouIcl mluce
intrusion inlO sleep slopes :and redoce Ihc destruction of SCftSilive
biological n:sources. Adoption of this ahemelivc would not be in
conformance willi the lIlIoplcd ERDR Specific Plan. Impacts 10 land
use would not be considered sianirlClnl with implementation of I":
desiln 01..........
This a1tc:mative would aeneratc fewer or an equal amount of peupIe
basIClI on densily opportunities dcpendiftl on finlll ~iln. As .
resull. population lenerated wilh this allcmative would nul CM:CCd
IfOwIh cxpedalions as oullined in the ERDR SpccirK: Plan
Amendment No adverse populalion impacLS an: anticiJDlcd. Wilh
respc:cl1O housin.. implemenlation of Ihis allemalive would lllow
lor the c1cvdopmcnl of up 10 IJ80 unill on _imaleIy 2lD
acres. Ocvclopmcnl of Ihis allemative as proposed would not be
consisIcnl wilh lhe lIlIopl<d plan. No employmcnl _un.a
would be lener:ded by lite altemalive. No silniracanl "impaas to
community social faclors would result wilh Ihis a1lCm11ivc..
ImplemenlStion ollila 01_ _IcI....I' in .1_.,. cquaI
number of residenlial units beiD. conslNCled. II is unknown what
lhe impact wouIcI be 10 IIle City of Quia ViSII.
SoU
.~\ ..-
Tabl. S-2
SUMMARY OF ALTERNATIVES (Continued)
ISSUE
NO PR01ECTIEXISTlNG SPECIFIC PLAN
ALTERNATIVE DESIGN 2
ALTERNATIVE DESIGN I
Services and Uti6.ies ImpoclS 10 services and olilities would be .imilar '0 Ihose of ,he
proposecI project and .. summarized as lollows:
Water: If waler facltilies are conscructed in occonbnce with
spccifalions included. in lite water master plan. adequate infra-
structure would exist to serve the projccl. No signiracanl impacls 10
~terllelftticipaled.
Sewer. No"vase UnpKu relaled.1O ...geapacity are 3rnicipat-
ed, proricIed that or..sile infrastruClure and off-sile impro\'Cmenls
outlined in the 1986 sewer study a'e implemented.
U,i1i.ies: SDG&E would be able 10 provide &IS ond electrici.y lor
this alternative. No imp3CtS to utilities would resull' .
Police: No .ianilican. impoclS 10 police _Id I...II.. provided 'ha' .
threshold policy standards .. met lor ..gmenting police ...Il.
w
......
r
L
-t
1
Fire: Eventual constrocllon of . rue aalion within lhe ERDR
planning would allow for adequate service for Ihis allern:uive.
School: Capacl.y 10 service an ........ in elementary Md high
. school SIudenIs is noI available. The capacity 10 salisJy fUlure
demands is not adequate. New schools in the planning and
c:onsuuction phases _Id salisly I..... cIemands. No ad.....
impoclS 10 school. are anticipated.
Water. Adoption of this altcmalive would result in water dem.-md
of 60-100% of that estimated for the proposed projcct No signifi-
cant impactS would result 10 waler if walcr facilities arc constructed
. in accordance wilh lhe spccif.cations included with lhe waler
maslC:r plan.
Sewer: Adoption of this allcmalivc would result in a rtduction or
equal sewer demand as the proposed projc:cL h is anlicipated that
on-site infraslrUClUre and designed off.site improvcmenls would
provide an adequate sewer system 10 ac:commodatc Oows associaled
willa this alternative.
~ AdopIim of lhis allernative would result in Wlter demand
of 6O-100lJ, of lhat esIimated for the pnJpOSCCI project. No $lInin..
CIIlt impaclS would result 10 water if wier fxililies are construcIed
in accord:\nce wilh lhe spec:iflCalions included wi'" lhe WIler
_plan.
I
;j
il
.,
I
.Sc.wa. AdopIion ci Chis IIlCmIIive would raull in . reclucliol'l 0.
. equaI sewer demand as .he proposecI projocl I' is lIlIkipaled "'"
c....,ite infrasuucture lAd desilned oCr-sile improvemcms would
provide an adcquale sewer system 10 acc:ommodalC flows associaIed
wilb this allemabve.
I
I
,I
~l
I
',1
i
i
Ulililies: It is anticipated that SOO&.E would be able 10 savice lhis ~: II is "'licipaled IhaI SOGAe would be able 10 Jef'Yice II..
design and no impacts lo utililies would result. ~In and no impaclS.1O ulililies would result
Police: Developmenl of this allernative would involve Ihc addition
of up 10 approx.im:llcly 3.600 persons to Ihe sector. As a resulc. it
is anticipaled Ihat this design allemati...e would require additional
police SI.,rr al buildoul. This number would depend on the number
of additional persons lenernled (rom this altemalive.
Fire: Evenlual construcdon of a rue SUlIion within the ERDR
planning would allow for adequate service for this allcmlltive.
School: Capoci'y 10 ....ice an ........ in eIementary ond high
school studcnlS is not available. 1be capacily 10 addy (ulure
demands is not adequate. New schools in the planninl and
conslruclioo pi-. would salisfy I..... demonds. No ad.....
impoclS 10 schools are Ift'icipaled.
Police: DevdopmenI of Ihis allemalive would involve the addiliol
of up 10 l'Ipflf'OIimalcly 3.600 perJORS 10 lhe seclOl'. As a result. it
is anlicipalcd lhallhis dcsiln allemalive would rcquin:.addilioo:ll
police scaff II. buildouL This number would depend un the number
. of addilionaJ persons aencra1cd from this Ikern....iw;.
Fire: EYCntual consIIUdion of a rue SlDlioI wilhm lite EROR
pL'W1ing would .lIow for adcquaIe savice for Ihis allcmative.
School: eapachy 10 _ 1ft increase in dcmCnlary lIlId .iJll
school sludenlS is ;milablc. The capacity 110 satisfy rUlute cIe:nt3'Mb
is not adcquaIc. New schools in lhe plaRnin, and c;onslnlClton
pIwcs would salisly I.".. demands. No adverse ;mpacu 10
schools are anlicipalcd.
SoU
.
::,
."
\J
J
..~ ~."
.. -,..........---.........................,.....-...., .....
Table S-2
SUMMARY OF ALTERNATIVES (Continued)
ISSUE
ALn:RNAllVE DESIGN 2
NO PROJECT/EXISTJNG SPECIFIC PLAN
ALn:RNAllVE DESIGN I
Parks. Rccn::uion
and Open Spocc
~
-
,
2J
..t
~
Imp:ICIS to parks. recreation and open space would be simiL'tr 10
(hose of the proposed project. SignifICant impaas to p.vks. recre-
aLion and open space would result with (he proposed two acres 0(
parkbtd. SignirJCanl imp.1Cts would be mitigated 10 a level below
significance with miligation proposed in conformance with the City
of O1u1a Vista's porkI:md cIedicalion ordinance.
Adopcion of Ihe aI.....a.. design would "",,,,,;,Uy dr.a<asc 'h.
number of rcsidenlS in this area and cause a com:sponding decrease
in the demand for m:rearionat facilities. The allemative design
would base acr<:Ise of por\dllnd requhed on a senernled poiJullllion
usinS Ihe City Tho:shoId Standards of 3 ..... of pnrIdand per 1.000
population. This al.....a.. would poIClllially resul, in less pari<
space Ihan Ihe JlIllIlOS'd projecl.. .
This a1......i.. would also ........ _ima"ly 2SO aclOS .of
open space or approximatdy 60 percent of the sile. an increase. of
approximately Joo acres over the proposed project. No significant
impacts to parks. reaealion and open space would result with this
alternative.
,.'
,.
AdopIion of Ihe a11em:1d.. design would "",,,,,;,Uy dccn:ase .he
number of residents in this area and cause a co..espo.:WSing decrease
in the demand for nxreaaional facilities. The allem.'llivc dcsian
would base acreage of partIand required on I generated papulal ion
usins the Ci'y llneshold StllldanI of 3 aa<s of porkIand per 1.000
populalion. This aJlemauve would potentially result in less pmt
space Ihan Ihe plUIlOSed projecl.
'i
r
,
~
"j
This alternative would also preserve lppfOJ.inwcly 210 acres rI
open Sp:K:e or approximalely SO percent or lhe silt. .. iACfeo'UC or
Ipproximalely 60 ICreS over lhe proposed project No siCllilic:lnl
impacls to parts, rem:alion InlI open space woukl result with lhi$
allernative.
1
.~
,
I
"
i
i
'i
'l
"
:.1
1
,
5-14
,.~:j
..'
ISSUE
Project IJescriplim
Geolo&y/Sou.
tv
'"
I
lJ
~
.J)
Table S-3
SUMMARY OF OFF-SITE ALTERNATIVES
CTTAY RANCH ALTERNATIVE SITE
Under Ibis .1I.....i.. scenario. devdopmenl of dle proposed project
sile would occur on this sile instead of the proposed Otay Ranch
projecL No ooncq>Iual plans have been develOped lor Ibi. a1temalive
sileo but it would consist of similar componenlS found in the proposed
Rancho del Rey project such as 1,380 single.family dwelling units.
IncludinS specially housins. . junior hip school sile,. neishbodlood
part, open space ..... lIIld major c_ roo....
Be:ause of the dose proximity of the proposed alternative sile.
geologic conditions &reroughly the same. Severe JIOUndshalcing may
occur on-silc in the event of I major earthquake from known active
faullS in the San Diego area. II is Mlicipated that strong around.
shakinS could cause landslides 10 occur m dle property. plIdicularly
where slopes are Sleep such as Poggi Can)'Cll. and where aUuvium is
located. Many of the major sOil unilS present 00 the western portion
of lhe proper1y cootain expansive clays. which could pose potential
sooted1nical problems lor dle desisn lIIld construc600 of ooildinas.
roodwsys. lIIld pI_colS. . In lddi6on, the Olay lIIld S.....WSIer
Formations idcnlified on-site contain beds of expansive clays. such as
benlonite. which would likewise present such ,..oolems. due 10 lheir
moderale 10 severe expansive properties. A signirlcanl part oltlle
area 00 dle western por6oo of dle Qlay IlIncho property conlains
formalions with these ctunclenslics. In addition. grading during
development could decrease the stability of existing slopes. An on-
sile specific gCOlechnica1 investigation would, however, have 10 be
conducted to delennine specifIC geologic hazards 10 lhe proposed
projecl. Due 10 lhe potential for groundshaking. landslides. and
ex.pansive soils on the altemalive site associaled with active (aullS in
Ihe San Diego area. potentially signifacanl impaclS lO geology could
resulL
CTTAY MESA ALTERNATIVE SITE
Under Ibis a11emll6ve scenario. dcvdopmenl of lhe proposed project
sile would OCt_ on this site instead of Ihe proposed Olay Mesa
projecL No conceplual plans have been developed lor Ihis .llemll-
live sile, but il would consist of similar componenlS found in the
JllOIlO""! Rancho del Rey project such IS I J80 sinSIc-I...Uy
dwelling units. including specially housing, ajunior high school sire.
. neishborhood part. open space .....lIIld major cin:u1a6oo roo....
BISCd on surroundinS proposed projeclS' sooteclutiClI inves6p1ions.
it is anticipaled that potenlial geologic hazards such IS ancient
landslides (associaled willi benlonitic clay layers) and faullS cold
u.isl on the projccl sile. Potenlial landslide localities lSSOCialed
with the Olay formation are also anticipaled 10 u.ist on-site, 15 well
as exJXlnsive soils associated with bentonitic clays. This site would
be influenced by several fault sysIems in the region including Ihe
Rose Canym Faull Zone. dle Coroondo Banks Faull Zone. lIIld the
San Miguel Faull Zone. A northeast-SOUIhwesl trendinS fault
probably Ida"" '0 ,he 1.1 NlCion is 1000'ed 10 the eIS.lIIld should
be considered poIentia11y active. Alluvial malerials located. in
ravines and canyons may be subject 10 Iandsliding in associaliod
with potential earthquakes. Potential impaclS 10 JCOIogy are
considered signiflC8nL AJ a result. a site-specifIC geotechnical
investigation should be conducted 10 delennine geotechnical
constraints and provide miligation recommendations as necessary.
w
,.
1
.~
l
I
'1
j
I
I
I
EASJ1.AKE VISTAS AND WOODS
Under Ihis a1_ivc JCcnario. deodopmcnl of the proposed
projecl site would occur 00 Ibis sile insJead of \he proposed
Ess1Iate Villas snd Woods projecL No conceplUlI plans have
been developed lor Ibis a1lemalive .~.. buJ il _Id cmsiSl of
simillr oompmenlS lound in \he Il"'P"*d Rlncho del Rey
project such IS 1,3lIO sinslc-l...Uy dwdtins ...ig. incIudinS
specillly housina. . junior hip school .ile, . neiShbodlood
part. open spoce ..... and IOIjar cin:ulalioo routes.
The _ cttnowft flUlt ...... 00 1he .k, snd ,lie low
seismic history of \he Chula Villa .... indicale IIun flUlt
displscement ....Id not pose . Ib.... to fu.... de..IopmenL
There is I possibililY that fulure ~ 8Ctivily in the San
Dieso rqion could produce modenole 10......,__S
00 dle project sile. This is . _ eWlinS ,lwouShoul
Southern Calilornia. In addi6on, .......lUCicnt landstides and
possible landslide I..'.... have been identified m the si.e by
Leishlm snd Associ.... (1919). Thm: is the potential lor dle
occ........ of liquef...,1e soils in localized ..... 01 alluvial
deposilS on-site in combination wilh perched poundwalU
dlling the Jliny DSOO. PoIentu.lly signifanl ceotolY
impsclS could .....11 wilb constnJCIion of the proposod project
mo this sile. A sile specirtc p:oIeChnicaJ study would be
conducted to determine these impacts if this a1lemalive is
lIdopled.
5011
ISSUE
BioIotly
Cullln) Resources
Tl1nsportalion
""
"-
I
&
~
Land US</Ocneral
Plan/loning
OTAV RANCH ALreRNATIVE SITE
Based on the biological resources mapped in the preliminary OIay
Ranch program EIR, development of Ihe proposed project on Ihis sice
would result in impacls 10 agricultural land. maritime succulent scrub,
Diegan coastal sage SCf1Ib. and native grassland (RECON, 1989). No
scnsilivc plants were mapped within lhe boundaries of this alternative
sile. Ir this alternative site were selected. a thorough biological survey
would be necessary 10 determine potential impacts. Based on
preliminary biological n:source information it is anlicipaled that
adoption of this alternative would result in fewer biological resource
impacts.
There are no known cultural resources on this site: therebe, no
impacts lo cultural resources would occur (Reid. pers. comm.. 1990).
Impacts 10 cullural resoun:es ror lhe proposed projecl were reduced 10
below a level or sisnirlcance.
Development of this area would create traCrac volumes grealer than
.hose planned for Ihe Qtay Ranch project and lhose planned by Ihe
General Plan. As a resull, an on.sile specifIC traffIC study would have
10 be conducted 10 detennine poIential signiflCanCC of the impacts and
required mitigation. The East Chuta Vista Transportation Phasing
Plan would be used u Ihe basis for determining ttafflc impacts. II is
anticipated Ihat lhese impacls could be mitigaled lo below a level or
significance.
This allemalive sile is located within proposed developmena areas of
the Easlem Terrilories of OIula Vista. Developmenl of Ihis allerna-
live sile wilh lhe proposed project woukl be partially in conformance
wilh the proposed low-medium density (3-6 du/ac) and open space
residential land uses; however. it would be considered a more
inlensive use Ihan bolh Ihe proposed Olay Rancho projecl and @eneral
plan deSi@n.'llion. Devclopmenl or lhe proposed project on this sile
Table S.]
SUMMARY OF OFF-Sire ALTERNATIVES
(Con.inucd)
OTAY MESA ALreRNATlVE SITE
The olHitc biological resources are not known at this time;
however. based on existing topography and the presence of inlennit.
tenl Slreams on the allcrnalive site. il is anlicipated IhaI Diegan
coastal sage scrub and low quality riparian vegetation may exist on.
site. Slopes wilh I northern exposure may support chaparral. U
this a1lernative sile were selected. a thorough biological suney
would be necessary 10 dclermine poIential impacls. The site may be
subject 10 applicable portions of the City of San Diego's Resource
ProIec1ion Ordinance penaining 10 biological issues.
The on-site cullUr3l resources are nol: known II this time. U this
alternalive wen: selected. a thorough archaeological invesrigation
would be necessary 10 locale sites and detennine poIential impaces.
Developmen' of Ibis aUcmative silO wilh the proposed project would
create comparable lramc volumes as (he proposed General Plan
uses. A sirc specifIC traffIC study would be conducted 10 determine
poICRlially signiflCal1t lrafflc impacls if this alternative sile is
selected.
Developmenl 01' thas alternative sile would be in substantial
confonnance wilh the General Plan's proposed residential, park and
school uses; however. il is anticipaled lhal placemenl 01 residenlial
uses on the aIlemalive site would require processing of I SpecifIC
Plan Amendment Allhough the surrounding area is for lhe tnOSl
pari prescnlly undeveloped. this area is planned for rUlure develop-
ment. A portion or the sile depending on sile design may be subjccl
EAS11.AKE VISTAS AND WOODS
The allernative sile is primarily composed of I,ricullur:ll uses
(ERCE). Impacts 10 biollllY _Id ... he ..liei"",cd to he
signifICant.
Cullural re!IOUI'teS were discovered on-sile durin, Ihe envi.
ronmental review conducled ror the EaslIake Vistas and Wood
project. AJ I resull. potentially lianie-cant impactS 10 cullural
.-.- coold ....11 w~h placemenl of lhe proposed project
on Ihis siIe. If !his a1tem11live is seIecIecI. I lhorougb ..
chacololical invesliption 10 locale sites Ind determine
poIen.ial impocu _Id be n<<essary.
1
I'
I~
:11
:1
I
,
II is estimaled IhaI cJemopment of residenIiaI .... as proposed
would raull in higher Ieneral.ioo raIcs of tralftc 10 IIlaI of the
Easdake VislaS and Woods racilily. The Eas\ OIula Visll
Transpof18lioo Phasinl Plan (ECVTPP) _Id be used as lhe
basis for delermining lIaale impacls. II is anlicipaled ahalthe
...mc volumes lenctllIcd wilh Rancho del Rey SPA 111 on Ihis
site would crt3Ie signmcMltraffic impaCls that would require
circulation i~ls as mili,llion measuru.
~
This rcsidettlial projccl as proposed _Id ... be in rou
conformance wilh land uses prescribed by lhe: Eaulake Planned
Community ror lhe Easllake VislU and Woods. As I resull.
. General Plan Amcndmcnl would have 10 be submilled and
liven discrCItonary npproval before imp&cmenlalion. Pre.
scribed rcsidenltal. !IChooI and part UliCS i5 considcn:d more
land usc ialcnsivc III.m thc Ea.~lakc Vi.'ltlS and Woods pn>>p-
1:
S-l'
r
,
'.. ,,10, .. ......, ~.... '.
..'.........,..... ......_.'~-."._-.,."...,......... . ......."..........-
Table S-3
SUMMARY OF OFF-Snc ALTERNATIVES
(Continued)
-
ISSUE
EASTLAKE VISTAS AND WOODS
II
~
!~
I
1
1
1
I
1
i
l
OTAY RANCH ALTERNATIVE snc
OTAY MESA ALTERNATIVE snc
Drainage/Ground-
waf.er{Water Quality
Landform Aller-
llion/Aesthetics
(.u
Air Qualily
"
,
~
......
As in the proposed project, devclopment of Ihe alternative site would
involve covering of surface soils during grading for building pads and
roads and would creale large areas of impcrvioos ground surface wilh
the 0VCJ311 dfect of facilitating water runoff during rainy periods.
Development of lhe site willi urban uses would resuU in a change in
the type and amount of contaminants contained in surface runorr. but
would not result in greater impacts to waler qualily Ihan the proposed
projecl Development of the sile would not significandy impact
dminage or groundwater/Wiler quality.
Development of lhe proposed project at Ihis alternative sile would
result in alleralion of the existing landform for the constnJClion of
roads and housing pads. II is anticipated that changes 10 landform
would not be as great as landform alteration on die proposed Rancho
del Rey site because (he existing topography on the OIay Ranch
altemalive is relatively level. TItc impacls would probably be below
a level of significance.
Adoption of Ihis allemative would allow developmenl of residences
lhal would generate aUlomobile Irips and resull in increased vehicular
emissions (loog-Ierm air quality impacls). Short-Ierm emissions from
conslruclion activilies would lenerale dusl and diesel emissions
resulling in short..enn emissions impacts. Stenuse lhe density
prescribed by lhe developmenl of lhe R.1flCho del Rey projccl is higher
lhan thai projcclcd in the General Plan for Ihe 0I3Y Ranch projecl in
Ihis 500-acre ponion, it is expected lhalthis allcnmlive sile would be
expecled to gcnerate more vehicle emissions. TItis would result in
significanl cumulnlivc air imp..1Cls to lhe San Diego Air Basin.
The sile conWns unnamed inlermiltenl slreams which drain south 10
north in lite northern half of lhe allernative sile. Buildout of too
proposed residential projecl onlo this sile would resull in increased
impervious surfaces which would drain into lhe local drainage
syslem. In .rdilion, additional urban pollulanls associated with
traffic and project buildoul would conlribule 10 runoff. A hydrologi-
cal analysis would need 10 be eooducled pior 10 developmenl to
determine silnificance of poIenlial impaclS and needed infraslrUc-
lure.
Developmenl of the proposed projecl allhis IllCmIlive sile would
resull in alleralion of lhe exisling landform for Ihe construc:lioo of
roads and housing pads. The alternative site is fairly hilly. bul wilh
nal portions which should be considered for the majorily of
proposed development Incorpontling sensitive design fealures
would probably result in impacts 10 landform lhal are below a level
of signirlCallCe. Because the surrounding land is primarily vacant.
Ihc ehange in visual qualily would be dnmllic and is considered
poIenlwly signirlC8l1t
Adoption of this allCmalive would allow developmenl or residences,
schools, and parks and would gener.lIe aulomobile lrips lhal would.
in lurn, gencrale emissions. Proposed land uses of lhe proposed
projecl onlo Ihis site are companble and, as a resull, il is anlicipaled
Ihal the proposed projecl would DOl generate sianirlcaI1lly grealer
vehicular emissioos Ihan lhe General Plan proposed land uses.
Deveklpmcnl of lhe proposed projecl on Ihis sile would rosull in
adverse cumulalive air qua lily impacts 10 the San Diego Air Basin.
The sile COIIlains the south-Oowing Salt Cn:et which drains a
major portion of the site. Buildoul of (he site would resuk in
increascll impervious surface which would increase url8n
runoff inlo lhe creek; 1$ . resull. addilional urban pollulants
could eventually enler lhe lower Olay Reservoir and me San
Diego Bay with litis runoff. II may be feasible 10 Iller lhe
drainage pallem 10 divert the runoff away from OIay Lales
into defenlion racililies, thereby minimizing impaccs 10 the
resenoir.
Developmen' of II1e pnlf'CJS<llI project II lIti, .......dve site
would resull in aItemlion of the exiscina landform for the
oonstruction of roads and housina pads. Topognphy of litis
allemalivc area is fairly hilly and may resuh in sisnirllClRl
impacts to landform if sensitive desiln of cluslerinl is not
implemented. LocaJ scclions ofTelearaph Canyon Road, OIay
Lakes Road and East H S_ (ProcIor VlUey Road) have
been designaled Scenic Roadways and visual impacts mly
result if proposed residenlial uses are noI sensilively hx:aled.
II is expected that increased landform allenltion would result
in this alternative area because of lhe more inaensive residential
land uses than lhose pnlf'CJS<llI in .his .....
Adoption or litis altemacive would lllow deveIopmenI or
residences and schools, resullina in I IreIICt number of
residential unils 10 be developed. A areater level of vehicular
emissions would result. Construction on lhis allemalive site
would resull in cumulalive si,nilicanl impacts 10 air"qualily.
1
I
5-.1
ISSUE
OTAY RANCH AL11!RNAl1VE Sill!
Table S-3
SUMMARY OF OFF-SITE AL11!RNAl1VES
(Con.inucd)
OTAY MESA AL11!RNAl1VE SITE
i
I.'
EASTLAKE VISTAS AND WOODS
.'
Land UseJOeneral
PIan/Zooing (conl)
Community Social
F1cton
Parts, R<CJUIion and
Open Space
Service IlId Utilities
~
.......
I
t..
<,.
f'J
would require I General Plan Amendment and cluslering of develop..
ment in accordance with proposed General Plan open space areas.
Incorpooltion allhis cluslering would avoid potentially signifICant
impaclS 10 land use.
Adoption of this ahemative would result in the genemion or a pealer
nwnber cl people than tl1aI proposed for Ihis ponion of Olay Ranch.
However. the greater population. housing. and employment require-
ments induced would not be signiflC8Dlly grealer and as I resull.
would not resull in adwne impacts to commooily social factors.
Adoption of Ihit 1I.....u.. ....Id requi.. !he _tion of a 12.3-
acre part. on-site. Under the City of Chula Vista parkland dedication
ordilllllCe, .hr<e acr<s of parkland per 1.000 people is r<quin:<!. Open
space acreages would need 10 be designated I. the project design
stage.. It is anlicipaled that no impacts to Parts.. Recreation and Open
Space would occur provided (hat surficienl parkland is dedicaled. This
alternative assumes the retention of Poggi Canyon IS a natural. open
space 00lrid0r.
The lltematiw: silo is IocaIed in a su_iaUy deodoped .... and
would have access 10 all infrastruCture requirements. The addiLional
population genented by the project ....Id place a gI<IIer demand on
all utilities and services than wilh land uses proposed roc Olay Ranch;
however. the increase would not be substantially grealer 10 create
signirlcant impacts. An increase in JX>lice staff would be required as
well as tal mooies provided 10 Ihc school districts for implementation
of this Ions-range development plan to avoid potenlial impacls 10
police and schools.
10 potentially signifICant noise impaclS from Brown Field lo
residential and park uses (i.e.. noise wings above 6OdB). No oIher
land use impacls are expected.
It it anlic:ipllled tl1aI populadon, housing. and employmen' r<qninl.
menU JenClIIcd from Ihc proposed project onto Ibis sire would
resuU in similar volumes. AJ a result. no impacts 10 mmmunity
social fJDn would resolL
Adoption cllhit lI......i-Ie ....Id r<quino !he -.ction cl a
123-",", pari: on.si.e. Undc<!he City of Omla Vi". parkland
dedicalion ordinance three acres of partlMd per .1.(1)) people is
required. II is anticipated that no impacts to Parks, Recrealion and
Open Space would occur prorided tl1aI sufficient parI:Iand dedication
is provided.
The lllOmaIi-Ie siIe is Iocatcd in a subslanlillly developed .... and
would hale ICCe5S to all infrastructure requirements. The additional
population gmerat<d by the project would place a aimilar demand
on all ulilities and services as land uses proposed by the General
Plan for Ihis area. An increase in police S1aff would be requirtd as
well as laX monics provided 10 the school distticls for implemcnla.
lion of this 1onl-l'll11C development plan 10 avoid potenlial impacts
10 police and schools.
osaI, but ... dramalically ... As a .....~ no signirlcant
impacb to land use would ....11.
Wilh i_'ion of 0- uses CIl 'lhis sI... im..... In
populalion, housing and employment ..........- -.Jd be
greater .han Ibose of EaslIake VisIas and Woods bu. would ...
result in signifanl implCtS 10 community social r.:lOI1.
i
I
';1
;)
AdopIion of Ihis a1ternatiYe would noquile!he __ cl
. a 12.3-ac1e park CIl-Site. Under the Cily cl Olula Vista
parkland dedication ....inanee Ilu<e acr<s cl parkland per 1,000
people is n:quin:d. h it anlieipalCd tl1aI no impaclJ '0 Parts,
Rec....iun and Open SJIICC would occur proYided lhaI
sufficien' paRland dedication is provided.
\
,i
.~
il
,
.,
,
II it anticipokd lhaI consInlCIion cl.he raidenliaI uses ... !he
altcmalllvc site would resuh in increased demands for water,
sewer, fire, school JnCI pJlice services. It is anlicipaced that no
sipirlCMl impaclS 10 water woold resuh it cmstruction of
poposed ClCililies coincides with lhe ..licipaled IfOWl.h. II is
an.icipaled lhaI!he proposed projec' would .....'In signir_.
sewage il1lJ*lS due to lack or uistinl capacity. Consuuction
or additional sewlae flCilities and provision of. U'eltmenI
c."pacity would miliplc projcc:t.spccirlC impaclS 10 below .
level of signirocanc:e. At buildoul 01 !he project site.oddi,;.....
police <tall may be requil<d to serve !he population g-
by the proposed projecl Cumula.ive impaclS 10 schools may
....U ond can be mi.igal<d by provision and/Ot fundin, cl
approfII'iac Cacililics.
!
I'll
,
1
I
:1
,I
5-1.
I,
I
" .......... ,..".#.
",...,. ..-... '...'...........
AMENDED
RANCHO DEL REY SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA
(SPA) m PLAN (EIR-89-10)
CANDIDATE CEQA FINDINGS
IN ACCORDANCE WITH SECTION 21081 OF
THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT
AND SECTION 15091 OF TITLE 14
OF THE CALIFORNIA ADMINISTRATIVE CODE
.31 - dS.3
.
1. BACKGROUND
It is the policy of the State of California and the City of Chula Vista that the City shall not
. approve a project if it would result in a significant environmental impact if it is feasible to avoid
or substantially lessen the effect. Only when there are specific economic, social, or technical
reasons, which make it infeasible to mitigate an impact, can a project with significant impacts
be approved.
Therefore, when an EIR identifying one or more potentially signjficant environmental impacts
has been completed, one of the following findings must be made:
1. Changes or alternatives which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental
effects as identified in the fmal EIR have been required in or incorporated into the
project, or
2. Such changes or alternatives are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another
public agency and not the agency making the fmding. Such changes have been adopted
by such other agency or can and should be adopted by such other agency, or
3. Specific economic, social, or other considerations make infeasible the mitigation measures
or project alternatives identified in the final EIR.
The following findings are made relative to the conclusions of the fmal Environmental Impact
Report (EIR) for the proposed Rancho Del Rey Sectional Planning Area (SPA) ill Plan (EIR-89-
10) based on the EIR text, and all documents. maps, and illustrations included in the public
record.
-1-
.]'-015~
2. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The proposed project involves a SPA Plan and tentativ~ map for approximately 405 acres. The
plan for the SPA m area is consistent with the Specific Plan although minor land use changes
have been made during the detailed planning process. The Rancho del Rey Spa ill Plan proposes
the construction of 1,380 single-family dwelling units (DU) from 3.8 to 10.6 DU/acre on eight
residential parcels comprised of approximately 206 acres. Included among the planned dwelling
units are 583 DUs of specialty housing on approximately 85 acres for a small retirement
community which will be composed of detached and attached housing. In addition, the project
proposes to provide a junior high school site totalling about 25 acres, a neighborhood park
estimated at 10 acres, a community facility consisting of approximately two acres, eight open
space areas totalling about 148 acres, and major circulation routes totalling about 14 acres.
Included with the provision of the EI Rancho del Rey Specific Plan is a mechanism to transfer
density from one category to another as a part of the SPA Plan approval process. The density
transfer will involve the transfer of 171 residential units within the SPA ill project area. The
approval of SPA ill will include the SPA ill Plan, a tentative map, a Public Facilities Financing
Plan, Design Guidelines, a Development Agreement, and a Specific Plan Amendment for density
transfers and park acreage additions. The elimination of the East J Street link connecting Paseo
Ranchero and Buena Vista will require a Specific Plan and General Plan Amendment.
The proposed project would be developed in three phases. The first phase would involve
development of the proposed retirement community. The second phase would involve the
development of the area west of Paseo Ranchero. The third and final phase would involve the
development of the area on the east of Paseo Ranchero which would include the junior high
school site and the neighborhood park.
-2-
31- .,55
3. INSIGNIFICANT IMPACTS
The final EIR for the Rancho del Rey SPA ill Plan concluded that the project would not have
significant adverse impacts in the following areas (numbers refer to the section of the EIR where
the issue is discussed):
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Orainage/Groundwater/Water Quality
Land Use/General Plan/Zoning
Community Social Factors
Community Tax Structure
Parks, Recreation and Open Space
Services and Utilities
Sewer
Utilities
Police Protection
Fire Protection
Schools
(4.2)
(4.8)
(4.9)
(4.10)
(4.11)
(4.12)
-3.
3/- ~s(.
4. IMPACTS FOUND TO BE MITIGABLE TO INSIGNIFICANT LEVELS
1. GEOLOGY/SOILS (4.1)
Development of the proposed project would involve mass grading for installation of utility
facilities and creation of streets and building pads. Detailed grading and earthwork
mitigation measures for project impacts associated with geologic units: seismicity,
earthwork, slope stability, foundation stability, drainage, shrinking and bulking,
compaction, expansion, and erosion and seepage, would be implemented prior to and
during construction.
Findings
A. Changes or other measures which mitigate the significant environmental effect have been
included in the project or are otherwise being implemented. These measures will be
incorporated as conditions of approval for final grading plans, foundation plans, and the
tentative map.
1) All fill would consist of approved earth material. The geotechnical consultant
would be contracted for evaluation of all fill at least two working days before
importation.
2) The height, slope ratio, and compaction of all cut-and-fill slopes would conform
to specifications identified by the geotechnical consultant, as appropriate. Fill
slopes not conforming to the assumptions stated in the geotechnical recommen-
dations would be individually studied prior completion of grading. Cut slopes
would be evaluated by the geotechnical consultant during grading. Grading would
be done in accordance with Chula Vista Grading Ordinance Number 1797 as
amended by ordinances 1877 and 2128.
3) Stabilization fills would be used in areas deemed appropriate by the geotechnical
consultant. The types and specifications of stabilization fills would be determined
during excavation by the geotechnical consultant.
4) Subdrains would be installed at the base of fills placed in canyons and draws or
over areas of actual or potential seepage. Specific locations would be determined
by the geotechnical consultant during excavation.
5) To reduce impacts from ground shaking during a major earthquake, the project
proponent would adhere to the Uniform Building Code and the Recommended
Lateral Force Requirements of the Structural Engineer's Association of California.
-4-
.3/- ~5 r
--
6) Foundations, slabs, footings, and retaining walls would be designed in accordance
with specifications identified by the geotechnical consultant, based on the type of
s.oiIs encountered and pertinent structural considerations.
7) Final grading plans and foundation plans for the project site would be reviewed
and approved by the geotechnical consultant and the City prior to construction.
8) Highly expansive soils used as fill or settlement sensitive improvements, loose
topsoil/colluvium, landslide debris, alluvial deposits, end-dump fills and
undocumented fills not removed by planned grading operations would be removed
to fIrm natural ground. The exposed natural ground would be scarified and
properly compacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction prior to placing
additional fill and/or structures.
9) The outer portion of fill slopes would be composed of compacted granular soil fill
to reduce the potential for soil erosion.
10) The site would be brought to final subgrade elevations with structural fill
compacted layers. Lifts of fill would be no thicker than will allow for adequate
bonding and compaction. Variable lift thicknesses would not exceed 6 to 8
inches.
11) Periodic on-site observations would be made by the soil engineer or engineering
geologist during grading and/or construction to monitor for the presence of
groundwater. Grading operations on the site would be scheduled to place oversize
rock and expansive soils in the deeper canyon fills and to utilize granular
materials having a low expansive potential to cap building pads and fill slopes.
12) A detailed grading and drainage plan would be prepared in accordance with the
City of Chula Vista Municipal Code, Subdivision Manual, applicable ordinances,
policies, and adopted standards. The plan would be reviewed and approved before
a permit is issued by the Engineering Division prior to start of any grading work
and/or installation of any drainage structure.
B. All significant effects that can be feasibly avoided will be eliminated or substantially
lessened by virtue of mitigation measures identified in the final EIR and incorporated into
the project as set forth above.
2. AIR QUALITY (4.4)
Development of the proposed project under the proposed Specific Plan would result in
significant cumulative regional impacts to air quality. The proposed project is expected
to generate approximately 11,405 ADT.
-5-
. 31-~5f
Findine-s
A. Changes or other measures which mitigate this significant environmental effect have been
included in the project or are otherwise being implemented as follows. These measures
will be incorporated as conditions of approval for the tentative map.
1) The developer shall provide a park-n-ride facility at the intersection of East H
Street and Paseo Ranchero to include 50 parking spaces, 10 bicycle lockers,
lighting, trash receptacles and circulation striping to the satisfaction of the City
Transit Coordinator. In addition, a transit stop, to include a bench, shelter and
trash receptacle, shall be provided on the north side of East H Street. A plan of
said improvements shall be submitted and approved by the City Transit
Coordinator and improvements shall be accomplished prior to approval of the first
final map.
2) The developer shall be responsible for the construction of wider sidewalks at
transit stops, subject to the approval of the City Engineer.
3) The developer shall provide a pedestrian throughway between lots 130 and 131,
Phase 3, Unit 2, from Camino Calabazo to East J Street across from the school
and park sites.
4) A minimum 20 foot wide access corridor shall be maintained at the end of Paseo
Palazzo where the cul-de-sac abuts the existing park. Said area shall be made
part of the park. Detail and design of the access shall be submitted to and
approved by the Departments of Planning and Parks and Recreation prior to final
map approval for Phase 3, Unit 1.
5) Prior to approval of each final map, the developer shall enter into an agreement
with the City wherein he agrees to comply with that version of the Growth
Management Ordinance in effect at the time a building permit is issued. Such
compliance includes but is not limited to the then current East Chula Vista
Transportation Phasing Plan and the adopted Air Quality Improvement Plan and
Water Conservation Plan for Rancho del Rey SPA m.
-6-
a /- 0;5''7
B. All significant effects that can be feasibly avoided will be eliminated or substantially
lessened by virtue of mitigation measures identified in the final EIR and incorporated into
the project as set forth above.
3. CULTURAL RESOURCES (4.6)
Development of the project under the proposed Specific Plan would require extensive
grading of the project area and would impact the identified cultural resources.
Findings
A. The two archaeological sites SDi-9601961 and Sdi-9893, located on the SPA III property
area have been identified as significant cultural resources. Site SDi-9601961 contains
evidence which can address the question of the presence of early man in San Diego. Site
SDi-9893 consists of surface and subsurface lithic scatter with the potential to yield
important information regarding resource exploitation patterns in southern San Diego
County. .
B. The following mitigation program has been completed and significant effects have been
mitigated. The program included:
SDi-960/961
1) The examination of existing surface collections.
2) A detailed grid-controlled surface collection of any artifacts remaining on the
surface site. Broken cobbles were also collected to evaluate whether or not they
are of human manufacture.
3) Surface disturbance was be recorded. Mapping and photographic documentation
were completed.
4) Mirna mounds were investigated to see whether the artifacts or broken bones were
incorporated into the mounds, were found on the surface under the mounds, or
were absent from the mounds.
5) The site was examined by a qualified geomorphologist to analyze the mima
mounds, their site setting, age, and stratigraphic integrity.
6) All material collected was washed, cataloged, and analyzed.
-7-
J/-.:>4.0
:
7) A report was prepared detailing the investigation and was submitted to the City
of Chula Vista, San Diego State University Clearinghouse, and the Museum of
Man.
SDi-9893
1) The site was analyzed through the excavation of 25 lxI-meter test units. These
units were analyzed to determine how much of the site would be excavated. A
total of 150 meters of backhoe trenches were excavated to search for potential
hearth features.
2) A report was prepared detailing the investigation and was submitted to the City
of Chula Vista, San Diego State University Clearinghouse, and the Museum of
Man.
C. The mitigation program has been completed and approved by the City. All significant
effects that can feasibly be avoided have been eliminated by virtue of completion of the
mitigation program as set forth above.
4. TRANSPORTATION (3.7)
Development of the proposed traffic under the proposed Specific Plan would result in
impacts on the roadway network in the vicinity of the project. The proposed project is
expected to generate approximately 11,405 ADT.
Findin gS
A. Changes or other measures which mitigate this significant environmental effect have been
included in the project or are otherwise being implemented as follows. These measures
will be incorporated as conditions of approval for the final map of each phase of project
development.
1) Signalize intersection of Telegraph Canyon Road and Paseo Ladera (Phase 1).
2) Open up the south leg at the intersection of East H Street/East Business Park Road
where Phase 1 traffic is assumed to enter and exit (Phase 2).
3) Construct Paseo Ranchero between H Street and Telegraph Canyon Road (Phase
2).
4) Extend J Street to provide a through two-lane road between Paseo del Rey and
Paseo Ranchero (Phase 2).
-8-
31-;;),,1
5) Place stop sign controls on Paseo Ladera at East J Street, East J Street at Paseo
Ranchero, and Paseo Ranchero at Telegraph Canyon Road (Phase 2). (The
intersection of Telegraph Canyon Road/Paseo Ranchero operates at LOS E for left
turns out of Paseo Ranchero; however, low traffic volumes on the minor street do
not meet signal warrants.)
6) Signalize the intersection of Telegraph Canyon Road and Paseo Ranchero.
7) East H StreetlHidden Vista Drive
There are a number of mitigation measures to bring the level of service at this
intersection to an acceptable LOS C.
a) Widen East H Street to four travel lanes in each direction;
b) Widen East H Street to four travel lanes in each direction and signalize the
Home Depot driveway; or
c) Widen north approach to provide three left tuni lanes.
When SR-125 is in place, it is possible that none of the above noted mitigation
measures for this intersection would be necessary. Yearly monitoring at the
intersection would provide guidance as to when and what type of mitigation
measures are best.
B. All significant effects that can be feasibly avoided will be eliminated or substantially
lessened by virtue of mitigation measures identified in the [mal EIR and incorporated into
the project as set forth above.
5. SERVICE AND UTILITIES - WATER (4.12)
Development of the proposed project under the proposed Specific Plan would result in
an increased demand for potable water. Development of the residential component of the
project would result in a demand for 420,000 gallons per day and 100,000 gallons per day
schooVpark/landscape areas of the development.
Findings
A. Changes or other measures which would mitigate the significant environmental effect
have been included in the project or are otherwise being implemented. These measures
will be incorporated as conditions of approval for the tentative map for the project.
-9-
J /-01 '-~
-
1) The applicant shall establish a water use offset program for Rancho del Rey SPA
IT and ill. This program shall be designed to fully offset the projected water
consumption of the project, after conservation measures are taken into account
(see Table 1-1). This requirement may be met by one or both of the following
means:
a.) The applicant shall participate in specific water conservation projects such
as C.I.M.I.S., new water wells, park and open space irrigation system
retrofitting or other such projects in combination with water conservation
offset fees to the satisfaction of the Director of Parks and Recreation; or
b.) Participate in a water conservation program by paying a water conservation
offset fee of $5.00 (to be adjusted annually) for each gallon of water used
by the project.
The applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City which establishes a
specific program in accordance with the requirements set forth above.
As an alternative to the above measures, the City Council may authorize the
applicant to participate in any other Citywide or regional water conservation
program adopted by the City Council with the overall level of water offsets to be
left to the sole discretion of the City Council.
2) Prior to approval of the associated fmal map, the developer shall provide onsite
infrastructure to accept and to use reclaimed water when it is available, along
Paseo Ranchero from Telegraph Canyon Road to East H Street and along East J
Street from Paseo Ranchero to the park site, per the adopted Public Facilities
Financing Plan.
3) Any costs incurred from retrofitting the reclaimed water system, when reclaimed
water becomes available, shall be paid by the developer. Monies for this shall be
held by the City, through a deposit set up by the developer. The amount shall be
determined by the developer, approved by the City and in place prior to approval
of each associated final map.
B. All significant effects that can be feasibly avoided will be eliminated or substantially
lessened by virtue of mitigation measures identified in the final ElR and incorporated into
the project as set forth above.
-10-
3'- a <<.3
S. IMPACTS FOUND INFEASmLE TO MITIGATE TO AN INSIGNIFICANT
LEVEL
1. LANDFORM ALTERATION/AESTHETICS (4.3)
Development of the project under the proposed Specific Plan would require substantial
landform alteration. The site would be modified from a vacant area of canyons and
ridges to a planned residential community. While the SPA II Plan is consistent with the
adopted specific plan in terms of landform and visual character, the project would result
in significant landfonn/aesthetic impacts including manufactured slopes up to 50-feet
Findings
A. Changes or other measures which mitigate this significant environmental effect have been
incorporated in the project or are otherwise being implemented, in that:
I) The project would adhere to the community design guidelines of the ERDR
Specific Plan. These guidelines include: buildings of a low-profile with a variety
of sizes, shapes, colors, and materials.
2) The final grading plan would be in conformance with general grading standards
and slope bank standards set forth by the City's Engineering Department and the
SPA ill Plan.
3) An overall landscape plan providing a comprehensive framework for individual
landscape plans would be prepared. Planting would conform to the applicable
City of Chula Vista standards for landscape planting.
4) As a condition of the tentative map, the City Engineering Department would
approve the grading plan to determine that it is in conformance with the ERDR
and SPA ill plans and the City's design guidelines. The final grading plan would
be reviewed by the City Planning Department prior to issuance of a grading
permit to verify that the design standards have been incorporated into the grading
plans.
5) Prior to issuance of the grading permit, a final landscape plan prepared by a
licensed landscape architect would be submitted to and approved by the City
Planning Department The landscape plan would show appropriate landscaping
of all slope areas and public rights-of-way. Landscaping within each phase would
be installed prior to occupancy of the first building with the corresponding phase
and 100 percent coverage would be achieved for groundcover within nine months
of planting.
-11-
al-;)~Co/
6) A temporary landscape and erosion control plan which would be approved by the
City Planning Department would be prepared by a licensed landscape architect
prior to issuance of a rough grading permit The plan would provide for
temporary landscaping on all disturbed areas not proposed to be landscaped in
accordance with the approved final landscape plans.
B. Potential mitigation measures or project alternatives which would eliminate or
substantially lessen the environmental effects and were not incorporated into the project
were found infeasible, based on economic, social, and other considerations as set forth in
the final EIR and listed below.
1) Development of the project in an economically feasible manner would require
significant landform alteration because of the hilly nature of the subject property.
To reduce the landform and visual impacts would preclude development of the
proposed project according to the goals in the EI Rancho del Rey Specific Plan
and the City of Chula Vista General Plan.
2) Development of the site in a way which would substantially reduce the landform
alteration/aesthetic impacts would preclude the use of the site to meet current and
project needs for housing, employment, and recreational opponunities.
3) Development of the site in a way which would substantially reduce the landform
alteration/aesthetic impacts would preclude the use of the site to meet current and
project needs for housing for senior citizens.
4) The reduction of landform alteration and visual impacts on the project site would
preclude the project applicant from achieving the goals of developing the project.
C. All significant landform alteration/aesthetic environmental effects that can feasibly be
avoided have been eliminated or substantially lessened by virtue of project changes and
mitigation measures identified in the final EIR and incorporated in the project as set forth
above. There remain some significant landform alteration/aesthetic impacts.
D. The remaining unavoidable significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level
when balanced against facts set forth above and in the Statement of Overriding
Considerations.
2. BIOLOGY (4.5)
A prior investigation of the biological resources on the Rancho del Rey SPA m site
prepared in conjunction with the EI Rancho del Rey Specific Plan EIR identified
significant unmitigable impacts to biological resources related to development to the
-12-
61-0)1,5
proposed project On the basis of those findings, a subsequent biological report (RECON,
1989) was prepared and reviewed for adequacy by ERCE (1989). In response to the
review, RECON performed a field survey and updated the original report (February 1990).
The SPA ill Plan incorporated measures designed to reduce identified impacts which
include preservation of approximately 40 percent of the Diegan coastal sage scrub habitat
occupied by the California gnatcatcher.
Findings
A. Changes or other measures which mitigate this significant environmental effect have been
included in the project or are otherwise being implemented, in that:
1) Natural open space is consolidated in the Rice Canyon.
2) The SPA m Plan will preserve approximately 40 percent of the Diegan coastal
sage scrub occupied by the California gnatcatcher.
3) A landscape plan to restore natural habitat in disturbed areas is being developed.
4) A revegetation plan to replant cacti in the Diegan coastal sage scrub to recreate
habitat for the cactus wren.
5) Acquisition of land with Diegan coastal sage scrub occupied by California
gnatcatchers.
6) Acquisition of 0.4 acres of land with vernal pools.
B. Potential mitigation measures or project alternative which would eliminate or substantially
lessen the environmental effects and were not incorporated into the project were found
infeasible, based on economic, social, and other considerations as set forth in the final
EIR and listed below.
1) Development of the proposed project in a economically feasible manner would
involve some loss of biological habitat. The preservation of all, or even a
substantial portion, of the biological resources on the project site would not allow
development to occur according to the goals expressed in the El Rancho del Rey
Specific Plan or the City of Chula Vista General Plan.
2) Development of the site in a way which should provide substantially more open
space could result in inefficient infrastructural design and would not respond to
the current and forecasted housing market needs.
-13-
3'-d~"
3) The preservation of the biological resources on the project site would preclude the
use of the site to meet current and project needs for housing, employment, and
recreational opportunities.
4) The preservation of the biological resources on the project site would preclude the
project applicant from achieving the goals of developing the project.
5) The preservation of the biological resources on the project site would preclude the
City of Chula Vista from benefiting from the projected increase in net revenues
which would accrue to the City from the development of the Rancho del Rey SPA
ill project. '
C. All significant environmental effects that can feasibly be avoided have been eliminated
by virtue of project changes and mitigation measures identified in the fmal EIR and
incorporated into the project as set forth above. There remain some significant biological
impacts.
D. The remaining unavoidable significant effects have been reduced to an acceptable level
when balanced against facts set forth above and in the Statement of Overriding
Considerations.
-14-
31-~"r
,.
AMENDED
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
CITY OFCHULA VISTA
RANCHO DEL REY SPA m
PROGRAM DESCRIPTION AND GENERAL GUIDELINES
This mitigation monitoring program is based on the mitigation and monitorina propam prepared
for the City of Qlula Vista for the Rancho del Rey SPA m Bnvironmentallmpact ~ (EIR)
and certified by the City Council in January 1991. This comprehensive monitoring program is
presented in two pares, the first of which addresses mitigation measures to be monitored by the
City of Chula Vista and the second of which addresses monitorina to be provided by the City's
environmental consult&nL The program will serve a dual purpose of verifying implementation
of the mitigation measures for the proposed project and of generating Information on the
effectiveness of the mitigation measures to guide future mitigation prosrams. The program
includes specific monitoring activities, a reportina system, and criteria for eValuating the success
of the mitigation measures.
The monitoring program for Rancho del Rey SPA m addresses impacts for the following issues:
o Geology and Soils
o Drainage/Oroundwater/Water Quality
o Landform Alteration/Aesthetics
o Air Quality
o Biology
o Cultural Resources
o Transportation
o Parks, Recreation, and Open Space
o Services and Utilities
A monitoring team has been assembled. Management of the team is the responsibility of the City
of Chula Vista. Monitoring activities will be accomplished by City staff and by environmental
consultants to the City.
PROGRAM PROCEDURAL GUIDELINES
Prior to any con5tr\1ction activities. meetings should take place between &l1 the parties involved
to initiate the monitorlna program and to establish the responsibility and authority of the
participants.
3/-;Jl,g
210'/200-' 3!')tid
ILI5169 01
WOi!l.::l 017: II 16. 5 Nnr
It is important that III effective reporting sySlem be Cltablished prior to any monitoring efforts,
It is necasary that all the parties involved have a clear understanding of the mitigation
monitoring measures as adopted and that these mitigation measures be dislributed to the
participants of the monitoring effon. Those whO would. have a complete list of III the mitigation
measures Idopted by the City would include appropriate City ,taff, the City', environmentAl
coDlUltant. the project applicant. the applicant', consultants. and the consttuction crew aupc:rvisor,
The City will diltribute to each monitor a specific list of mitigation measures that pertain to their
11lC)ft1toring tasks and the appropriate time frame that these mitigation measures are anticipated
to be implemented.
The following text includes a lummary of the project Impacts, The next section of the text
foc\llel on the monitoring responsibilities of the City of O1ula Vista staff. followed by a section
describina the propm for which the City's environmental consultant is responsible, The
mitigation and monitoring program included in the EnvironmentAl Impact Report is included as
Attachment A of this document.
MOMrrO~GBYCITYSTAW
Please note that the following section derives from the EnvironmentAl Impact Report prepared
for the Rancho del Rey SPA m project.
GEOLOGY AND SOILS
Mitigation Measures
1. All fill would consist of approved earth material. The geotechnical consultant would be
contacted for evaluation of imported fill at least two worldng days prior to importation.
2. The height, slope ratio. and compaction of all cut-and.fill slopes would conform to
specif'lCations identified by the geotechnical consultant. as appropriate, rill slopes not
conforming to the assumptions stated in the geotechnical recommendations would be
individually studied prior to completion of grading, Cut slopes would be evaluated by
the geotechnical consultant during grading. Grading would be done In accordance with
Chula Vista Grading Ordinance number 1797 IS amended by ordinances 1877 and 2128.
3. Stllhili 7tlrion fills should be utilized in areas deemed appropriate by the geotechnical
consultant. The types and specifications of stabilization fills would be determined during
excavation by the geotechnical consultant.
2
21 <l/C<l<l'39t:1d
1,(15169 01
3/- :11p9
WO~.:l lv:l1 16,5 Nnr
4. Subdrains would be installed at the base of fills placed in canyons and chaws or over
IlClIS of actual or potenua! seepage. Specific locations would be determined in the field
durinl Jl'ldi1lJ. with installltion bcinl reviewed by the poloJical consultant prior to
pJacement of fill.
5. To reduce irnplCts from sroundshaking during a major earthquake. the project proponent
would adhere to the Unifonn Buildl.n& Code and the Recommended Lateral Force
Req~ts of the Structural Engineer's Association of California.
6. FOUDdatlons. slabs, footings. and retaining walls would be dcsianed in ICCOfdance with
lpeCificatIons Identified by the geotechnical consultant, based on the type of lOlls
encountered and pertinent strUCtural considerations.
7. Final grading plans and foundations plans for the project lite would be reviewed and
approved by the ICOtechnical consultant and the City prior to constrUCtion.
8. Hilhly expansive soils used IS fill would be p1&ced a minimum of 3 feet below finish
grade and IS feet inside of fill slopes. Bentonite. if used as fill, would be placed a
minimum of 10 feet below fmish JI'Bde and IS feet inside of fill slopes.
9. In &reIS that receive fill or settlement sensitive improvements. loose topsoiVcolluvium.
landslide debris, aIluvW deposits. end-dump fills. and undocumented fills not removed
by planned grading operations would be removed to linn natural sround. The exposed
JIAtUrIl ground would be scarified and properly compacted to It kISt 90 percent relative
compaction prior to placing additional fill and/or strUCtUreS.
10. The outer portion of fill slopes would be composed of compacted granular lOil fill to
reduce the potential surfiCial erosion.
11. The site would be brought to final subgradc elevations with structUr8l fill compacted in
layers. Ufts of fill would be no thicker than will allow for adequate bonding and
compaction. Variable lift thicknesses would not exceed 6 to 8 inches.
12. Periodic on-site observations would be made by the soil eniiDccr or enJineering geologist
during grading and/or construction to monitor for the presence of Il'oundwater. Grading
operarions on the site would be scheduled to place oversize rock and expansive soils in
the do:eper canyon fills and to utilize: granular m&teri&ls hiving I low explll5ion potential
to cap building pads and fill slopes.
MonItoring Agenc)'
The City of Olula Viats Engineering Department would be leSpOnsibk for verifying irnplcmenta-
Ion of the mitigation measures associated with the potential geology and soils impacts.
3
210/1'00'38I:1d
11.15169 0.1.
31 - ~ 'TtJ
WO~:1 21': 11 16. 5 Nnr
DRAlNAGElGROUNDWATER/WATER QUALITY
Mitlption MllIIlIUl'CS
1. Adherence to regulations resardin, stonnwatcr disc:harie set forth in the National
Pollutant Discharge Blimination System (NPDES).
MoaltorlDl Apncy
The City of Quia Vista Engineering Department would be responsible for verlfyinJ implementa-
tion of the mitilat10n measures associated with the potential groundwater/wate:l' quality impacts.
LANDFORM ALTERATION/AESTHETICS
Mitigation Measures
1. Implementation of the community design guIdelines detailed in the SPA m plan.
2. Preparation of an overall landscape scheme (refer to p. 4-18 of the EIR) providing a
comprehensive framework for individual landscape plans. Planting would confonn to the
applicable City of Chula Vista standards for landscape planting. If a l'Ou,h aradin,
permit is requested, an erosion control plan would also be DeCC&SlII)' (scc p. 4-19 of the
BlR). The plan would provide for installation of temporary landscaping on all disturbed
areas not proposed to be landscaped in accordance with approved final landscape plans.
This plan must be prepared by a licensed landscape architect.
Monltorln& A&ency
The City of OIula Vista Planning Department and Engineering Depanment would be responsible
for verifying the Implementation of the mitigation measures associated with the landfonn
alteration/aesthetic impacts.
AIR QUALITY
Mitigation Measures
1. Adherence to recommendations made by the 1982 SIP and the forthcoming San Diego
Air Quality Plan regarding local participation in air emission miuction measures.
2. The project proponent would facilitate the use of alternative transportation modes by
promoting public transit usage and carpooling by project residents through provision of
4
210/S00'3Eltld
lLIS169 01
3/- ~rl
WO~.::l 21': II 16, 5 Nnr
park-aDd-ride lots and bicycle facUities. including bicycle lanes and IeCU!'e storage
facilities at all publlc facilities within the project IJ'eL
3. The project proponent would provide mass uanslt lCCommodations for convenience of
CIIa&omm (bus shelters) llJld vehicles (bus turnouts) ineluding a transit stop in front of the
redrement eonununity on East H Street.
4. To avoid C!Qtion of air pollution Mhot spotsM at intersections, mitigation measures
reeommended in the Transportation Section would be implemented to zeduce potentially
al",lflt''lnt impacts to air quality.
MonItoriDa Apney
The City of ChuIa Vista Planning llJld Engineering departments would be raponsible for
verifying the implementation of the mitigation measures associated with the air quality impacts.
CULTURAL RESOURCES
MitiptioD Measures .
Mitiption measures for cultural resources have been completed; no additional mitigation or
monitoring is necessary.
TRANSPORTATION
MittptiOD Measures
1. Bxisting + Cumulative Mitigation Measures
L Prior to occupancy of any units of SPA m. subject to meeting traffic warrants,
signalize Telegraph Canyon Road and Pasco LaderL
2. Existing + Cumulative + Phase 1 of SPA m Mitigation Measures
L Open up the south leg of the East H Stree!/East Business Park Road intersection
where Phase 1 traffic is assumed to enter and exit
3. Existing + Cumulative + Phase 1 + Phase 2 of SPA m Mitigation Measures
L Construct Pasco Ranchero between H Street and Telegraph Canyon Road.
,
3'- d T~
WO~,j CI>: II 16.5 Nnr
<: I (:l/se~'~~I;I;:l
1l.15169 01
b. Extend 1 Street to provide a through two-lane road between ~ del Rey and
Paseo ~hcro.
c. Place stop sign controls on Paseo Ladera 11 East 1 SU'CCt. Bast 1 Street at Pueo
Ranchero. and Paseo Ranchero at Tc1epaph Canyon Road.
4. Existin& + Cumulative + Phases 1.2. and 3 of SPA m Mitlption Measures
L S1analize Telepaph Canyon Road and Pasco Ranchero.
5. Compliance with ECVTPP for c:um:nt and future updates to maintain ICCeJltab1c levels
of service on all affected intersections and roadway scamcnts.
Monltorln& Alene)'
The City of CluIa Vista Planning Department and the City Traffic Engineer would be respon&lble
for verifyini implementation of the mitigation measures associated with transponation impacts.
PARKS. RECREATION, AND OPEN SPACE
Mitiaation Measures
1. The project proponent would provide a detailed concept plan for the park acceptable to
City staff and the Parks and Recreation Commission.
2. Slopes within the park would be 4; 1 or less. If slopes are pater than this ratio. the
project proponent would be required to provide additional parkland.
3. The project proponent would enter unto an agreement with the Sweetwater Union High
School District and the City of Chula Vista to insure public access to the proposed junior
high school's recreational amenities which would include soccer fields. basketball courts.
and teDDis couns.
4. The proponent wouId provide funding for the difference in cost between facilities built
to school standards and facilities built to City standards.
5. School recreational facilities available to the public would be consl1'UCtcd to City of CluIa
VisU. standards and desiJlled in consultation with City staff.
6
2t0/<.00'3~tOd
l<.t5:169 01
31'" ~=1-3
WO~j;:I \7\7:11 16.5: Nnr
6. To insure Idcquate interface between the adjacent townhomcs. the pllJ'k, and the school.
the park would be designed so that it would not be Isolated with only backs of buildings
flCinJ onto the park.
7. The park would be deslJOed to provide adequate visibility into the pllJ'k from But 1
Street.
8. Access to .the school parking lot for overflow parkina would be provided.
MonltoriDI Apncy
Tbc City of Qula Vista Planning Department and Parks and R~on Depanmcnt would be
I'IlIlponsible for verifying implementation of the mitigation meuum associated with the park
impacta.
SERVICES AND maITIES
MitlptioD Meuures
Water.
Sewer .. 1.
.
2-
f911ce - 1.
ll!:!- 1.
~ 1.
MonItoriD& Alency
1.
The applicant shall meet whatever policy regarding water
conservation is adopted by City Council.
Development of on-site sewaae facilities consistent with the 1986 sewer
study to accommodate project flows.
Compliance with City Enpeerlng Standards for sewage facilities.
Addition of 4.6 police personnel.
Addition of one Fire Inspector.
Applicant participation in the Mello Roos ColJU!lunity Facilities District is
required. Specifically the project is located within two Mello Roos
Districts. Sweetwater U~on High School District CPO *3 and Chula Vista
City Schools CFD 4113.
The City of Chula Vista Planning Department and Engineerini Department would be responsible
for verifying implementation of the .mitigation measures associated withimpaets to water, sewer,
police protection. fire protection, and schools.
210/S00'391:ld
7
ILI5169 01
3/- ;; '-1'/
wo~=' \:>1>: II 16, 5 Nnr
MONITORING BY THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANT
Monitmina will be pcrfonncd by both general environmental monitors and environmental
apeclalists. The primary role of the environmental specialists servina as consultants to the City
is to provide expenise wbeI1 environmentally sensitive issues occur IDd to provide direction for
mitiption.
In addition to the list of mitiption measures provided, each monitor will have compliance report
forma with each mitiaation measure written on top of the fonn. The monitors will complete the
npoIt form IDd flle It with the City followlna each monltorinl actlvit)'. The conclUlions of these
forma will be compiled into an interim and final comprehensive construetion report to be
submitted to the City of Clula Vista. This report will describe the major accomplishments of
the monitorinl prosram. summarize problems encountered in achievina the aoats of the proaram.
evaluate solutions developed to overcome problems. and provide a list of future monitorina
programs. In addition. each monitor will be required to f1ll out and submit a log report. The 101
report is.used to record and account for the monitoring activitie& of the monitor. Weeklyhnonthly
status reports will be generated from the daily logs and compliance reports and will include
supplemental material (1.e.. photographs, memoranda, telephone logs. and letters),
The Mitiption Monitorinl Coordinator (MMC) will provide monitoring services for biological
resources with the exception of the impacts associated with the vernal pools which will be
monitored by the Vernal Pool Mitigation Monitoring Consultant (VPMMC),
BIOLOGY
DlEGAN COASTAL SAGE SCRUB AND CALIFORNIA GNATCATCHERS
M!!i2atlon - Monitor Jrading to reduce impacts to coastal sage scrub habitat. The app~cant
shall define and the MMC shall verify the Diepn coastal sage scrub lIJCas to be
retained on the final grading plans prior to any clearinl. dlstlU'binl. or grading
activities onsite in areas containing coastai sage sc;rub. All those lIJCas to be
retained shall be flagged by the applicant and reviewed by the MMC to prevent
encroachment. A field map will clearly identify the Diegan sage scrub mitigation
activity locations.
MonltorinR _ The MMC will review the flagging with the constrUction supervisor. The MMC
will inspect the Diegan scrub areas prior to grading to ensure the flag markers lIJC
visible and that the areas have not been encroached uPon. The MMC willlnspect
the area during grading once cvt:ry 1-2 weeks and after grading is completed to
determine whether or not encroachment has occurred.
JleDOrtln2 _ The MMC will provide the City with a report when the aradlna is completed.
8
21121/6121121'3Eltld
lLl~169 01
.3 / - J =1-5
WO~.:l ~\:>:11 16. ~ Nnr
.
Rancho del Rey developers will identify a site with coastal saae ICl'IIb habitat
offaite. and the U.S. Fish and Wildlife ServIee (USPWS) and the California
Department of Fish and Game (COPo) will de1elmine whether or Dot the site is
IICceptable as off site mitigation. The USFWS and the CDFO will ensure that the
CIlifomia lfIatcatcher populauon dcnsilies meet the requbed density per acre or
otherwise meet the criteria speclfled in Comment f90 and Responae to Comment
f90 in the CertIfIed BIR.89.10 that states, the applicant Ihall "acquire and
preserve an off.site area of coastal saae scrub habitat ~wledgcd by the U.S.
FlIh and WildUfe Service and the City of Clula Vista to equal or to exceed the
conservation aoals" of the other options stated In the EIR..
The developer would dedicate the mitiption site to the City of Clula Vista or any
other appropriate entity approved by the City of Qula Vista. On an interim basis,
protection of any resources may be carried out through the imposition of a
conservation easement.
1dWIIllm1-
.
Mm1l!m:In&' The City of Qula Vista Planning Department in consultation with the U.S. Pish
and Wildlife Service and the California Department of Fish and Game would
approve the mitigation site.
JleDOrtln2 - The MMC would verify that conditions have been met.
1dltlntlon. Areas to be preserved in native open space would be staked by a representative
of the Rancho del Rey survey team and checked by the MMC.
MsmlWiD1- The MMC would inspect to ensure that no grading IICtivity occurs in the specialty
housing area until after the gnatcatcher mitilation site has been approved and
acquired. Prior to grading, the MMC would inspect t1a&ged areas to ensure that
markers are visible and that there is no siJll of encroachment. The MMC would
again inspecl after the grading is completed to determine whether or not
encroachment has occurred.
ReDOrUnl! - The MMC will provide the City with a report indicating when the grading for the
apecialty housing may begin and. again, at the conclusion of gradina IICtivities.
CONSTRUCTION STAGING AND SEWER LATERAL CORRIDORS
Mltlntlon. The applicant and the construction supervisor will examine the proposed
construCtion staging areas to determine whether or not these areas will impact
sensitive biological resources.
9
210/010'39t:1d
1<'15169 01
31-cJ=f h
WO~,:j 91>: II 16, 5 Nnr
Mgpltoriu. The MMC will inspect all staging areas to determine whedler or not encroachment
!nil) eensitive biological resource areas has occum:d. Paiodic !nspecdons will be
conducted to ensure that the stalinl cea does not expand into ICnSitive ceas.
Jl,eDOrtin,. A Iwnmary of the findinp relardinl construCtion stalinl U'CU will be iDcludcd
in the annual report throulhout the construction period.
ldIliDlIm - The applicant will stalee proposed lOwei' corridor and the MMC will review the
ltaking for the lOwer installation corridorl prior to deslan fi1\,t;'Jltlon. These
conidors will be adjusted to avoid ICnsitive biological resourt:CS. Sewer laterals
will alIobe positioned to minimize impacts to biolopcal resourceS.
MlmI&5IdDl- The MMC will inspect the flailed corridor just prior to Jl'ldinl to determine that
the corridor is poSitioned in a manner as to avoid sensitive bioloaiea1 resources.
ReDOrtlnv - The MMC will provide the City with a report indicating that the lOwer laterals
have been implemented according to the specifICations of the monitoring biologist
Mltleation - The applicant would monitor and the MMC verify the cxistinl population of
California anatcatchers on the SPA m site to detennine the effect of development
on the anatcatchcr. The open space ceas of SPAs I and n would be included in
the study area.
Monltorine - The MMC would survey the area throughout the matina and nestinl period from
early spring through late summer. The surveys will be population counts. of the
California gnatcatcher and will determine approximate territorial boundaries of
each pair. The surveys will be specif'1C to the California gna.u:atcher. but will be
general in approach, No banding, netting, or trapping is proposed. Detailed field
notes will be completed and reasonable assumptions will be made as to whether
or not the same individuals are present before and after construction. No detailed
Ye,etation analysis. including ttansects or quadrants, are proposed as part of this
task. A pneral veaetation description will be conducted.
Jl,eDOrtlfll - The MMC will provide the City of Chula Vista with reports indicaUnI the effects
of development on the anatcatcher population. The report will include the number
of birds and their territories. These reportS will be included in the annual report
for a period of five yea:5 after completion of the project to assess the recovery of
the California anatcatcher population. The infonnation ptbcred in this study will
be Ihared with the resource aaeocies to help develop a reponal set of JUidc1ines
for California anatcatcher mitiaation plans.
10
2t0/1t0'3!:>t:ld
lL15169 OJ.
1>' - J=1:f
1oJ0~.::l 91" 11 16. 5 Nnr
REVEGET ATJON
Jofitill1ltion _ Thc MMC will revicw McMillin's revcJctation program. This revclctation plan
will be submitted to the CI1y of Chuia Vista Planninl Department for final
approval. In Iddition, the MMC will review all ereas revegewed in open space
areas and arus impacted by sewer laterals with coastal saJe sc:rub species native
to the site. RDR will design and incorporate a ttansplant proJl'llT1 for snake chelIa
and San Diego barrel cacti which wilJ be reviewed by the MMC. The golden-
apincd cercus cactus clump will remain in open space.
MmI1lm:IDl- The moegetation plan will be monitored by the MMC for a period of five yem
to ensure the success of the revegetation project. The MMC will conduct field
visits quarterly the first year, twice the second year, and once per year for the
followlnl three years.
lleDOrtfnr.' The MMC will provide the City with reports documenting the a:eas which have
been reveletated and monitorinl the Jl'owth of the reveletated areas. These
reports will continue for a period of five years after starting the revegetation
efforts.
ITEMS TO BE PROVIDED BY THE APPLICANT
The MMC will require copies of the following documents which wUI used in the evaluation of
the bioloaica1 resources mitigation monitoring program:
o RDR SPA DI master grading plan
o RDR SPA m erosion and sedimentation plan
o RDR SPA m water manaaement ~deline/plan
o RDR SPA m landscape and irrigation plan
o RDR SPA m reveletation plan
o RDR SPA m plan for access to open space arus for mainteJlancc and fire
protection
o RDR SPA m map of open space trail system and adjacent landscaping
o RDR SPA m tentative maps
11
211!1/21I!1'39l;jd
1'-11;;169 0.1.
3 I - ~ =1K
WOi!l.:l '-I': 11 16. 1;; Nnr
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
RANCHERO DEL REY SPA m
MITIGATION
Prior to issuance of a grading permit the Planning Department of the City of Chula Vista would
ensure that the project proponent acquires and preserves 0.4 acres of vernal pool-associated lands.
The vernal pool acquisition is not required to be in the City of Chula Vista. This mitigation area
is equivalent to twice the vernal pool area (0.2 acres) lost as a result of grading on the proposed
project area. The proposed vernal pool mitigation site would be acceptable to the City of Chula
Vista in consultation with USFWS. The criteria for determining the acceptability of the
mitigation site will be (I) the presence of vernal pool habitat, and (2) its long-term conservation
potential.
The acquired vernal pool mitigation area would be an area recognized by the USFWS as an area
supporting pool habitat. It would be a vernal pool area that is currently in private ownership and
not protected by a conservation easement. The mitigation site can have existing vernal pools
occurring on it, or it may be an area that is historically known to support vernal pools and that
could be restored. If an area requiring restoration is chosen as the site, a vernal pool restoration
plan which is acceptable to the City of Chula Vista in consultation with the USFWS would be
prepared and implemented. The site would be adjacent to or connected by an appropriate
landscape corridor to a larger area or interconnected set of patches of preserved vernal pool
habitat that are currently in designated open space.
A spring survey would be conducted to ensure that no additional vernal pools would be affected.
If additional vernal pools are identified, additional acquisition of mitigation area would be
required in the ratio of 2: 1.
A-I
3 I - ~ 1-7'
MONITORING
The City of Chula Vista Planning Department would be responsible for verifying the acquisition
and preservation.
REPORTING
A summary report of the spring survey, final requirements for mitigation, and the acquisition site
will be placed on file with the City of Chula Vista and submitted to U.S. Fish and Wildlife
Service.
MITIGATION
No grading or activities which would adversely affect the habitat in the vernal pool area would
occur prior to accomplishing the offsite acquisition. Immediately upon acquisition of a suitable
vernal pool mitigation area, the acquired site would be fenced with a six-foot chain-link fence
to protect the area. The applicant would be required to secure a conditioned Nationwide pennit,
to be issued by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (Section 404 of the Clean Water Acct), that
contains the conditions outlined in this section concerning vernal pools. This Corps permit would
be applied for and received to grading.
MONITORING
The City of Chula Vista Planning Department would confirm that acquisition of the vernal pool
mitigation site and USACOE pennit process had been completed. The MMC would verify the
fencing.
A-2
31-.Jt{O
REPORTING
The MMC will provide the City of Chula Vista with a report documenting the fencing.
MITIGATION
The project proponent would make an irrevocable offer to dedicate the offsite
acquisition/mitigation site to the City of Chula Vista. County of San Diego. or other appropriate
open space holder at the time of issuance of the grading permit. Interim responsibility for the
preservation of the site would remain with the project applicant until an acceptable dedication
of the land has occurred.
MONITORING
The City of Chula Vista Planning Department will confirm the dedication offer.
REPORTING
A copy of applicable dedication offer documentation will be placed in project file.
MITIGATION
Prior to or as a condition of approval of the grading permit the applicant would secure a
Streambed Alteration Agreement as stated under Section 1601-1603 of the California Fish and
Game Code. for proposed access road (Paseo Ranchero) that would cross a major drainage on
the site.
A-3
3/-;)81
MONITORING
The City of Chula Vista Planning Department would review the Streambed Alteration Agreement.
REPORTING
A copy of the Streambed Alteration Agreement will be placed in the project file.
A-4
3/- ~ 9-
RANCHO DEL REY SPA III
MITIGATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM
Task
Geologv and Soils
Approve and evaluate fill mate-
rial at least two days prior to
fill importation.
Evaluate cut and fill slopes for
conformance with specifications
established by geotechnial re-
port
Analysis and evaluation of
appropriate location of stabiliza-
tion fills.
Install subdrains at the base of
fills in canyons and draws or
over areas of potential seepage.
Determine locations during
grading.
Conduct grading in accordance
with City of Chula Vista Grad-
ing Regulations.
Adhere to uniform building
code for construction.
Design foundations, slabs. foot-
ings, and retaining walls in
accordance with specifications
identified by geotechnical re-
port.
Review and approve fmal grad-
ing and foundation plans for the
project site.
Time Frame
Prior to issuance of
Grading Permit
Tentative Map
Grading Permit
Grading Permit
Grading Permit
Grading Permit
Grading Permit. and
Building Permit
Grading Permit and
Building Permit
Place bentonitic clays used as Grading Permit
fill material a minimum of 10
feet below fmished grade and
15 feet ulSide fill slopes.
Place expansive soils correctly. Grading Permit
Move fill not removed by Grading Pern,it
plaIUled grading operations to
fum natural ground.
Responsible for
Task
Applicant/Geotech-
nical Consultant
Applicant/Geotech-
nical Consultant
Applicant/Geotech-
nical Consu Itant
Applicant/Geotech-
nical Consultant
Applicant/Geotech-
nical Consultant
Applicant/Geotech-
nical Consultant
Applicant/Geotech-
nical Consultant
Applicant/Geotech-
nical Consultant
Applicant/Geotech-
nical Consultant
A pplicant/Geotech-
nieal Consultant
Applicant/Geotech-
nical Consultant
31-~i3
Responsible for
Verification
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Engineering
Chula Vista Depart.
roenl of Engineering
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Engineering
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Engineering
Chula Vista Depa11-
ment of Engineering
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Engineering
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Engineering
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Engineering
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Engineering
Chula Vista Depart.
ment of Engineering
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Engineering
Dale of
Completion
Mitigulion
Compldc.Dall'J
and Vcrili,-.d
RANCHO DEL REY SPA ill
MITIGATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM
(Continued)
Task
Time Frame
Geology and Soils (Continued)
Insure that temporary slopes Grading Permit
meet the minimum requirements
of applicable Health and Safety
Codes.
insure that outer portion of fill Grading Permit
slopes are composed of com-
pacted granual soil fill.
Bring site to final subgrade Grading Permit
elevation<; with structural fill
compacted in layers.
Monitor for presence of Grading Pe.rmit
groundwater.
Design for the removal of allu- Grading Permit
vial/colluvial deposits in the
canyons adjacent to the pro-
posed toes of fill slopes.
Undercut portion of transition Grading Permit
settlements a minimum of three
feet and replace by low expan-
sive granual soils.
Grade site to allow soils within Grading Permit
tilTee feet of finish grade to
possess an expansion index of
less than 50.
Include the design and construc- Grading Permit
lion recommendations on the
fmal grading and foundation
plans.
Review fmal grading plans. Grading Permit
:Monitor on-site grading to Grading Permit
confirm soil conditions as antic-
ipated.
During Construction
Provide testing and observation
report to verify that design and
construction recommendations
are completed according to
grading plans.
Responsible for
Task
Applicant/Geotech-
nical Consultant
Applicant/Geotech-
nical Consultant
A ppl icant/Geotech-
nical Consultant
Applicant/Geotech-
nical Consultant
Applicant/Geotech-
nical Consultant
Applicant/Geotech-
nical Consultant
A P pi icant/Geotech-
nical Consultant
Applicant/Geotech-
nical Consultant
Applicant/Geotech-
nical Consultant
Applicant/Geotech-
nical Consultant
A ppl i cant/Geotech-
nical Consultant
3/- ~ tlli
Responsible for
Verification
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Engineering
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Engineering
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Engineering
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Engineering
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Engineering
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Engineering
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Engineering
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Engineering
ChuJa Vista Depart-
ment of Engineering
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Engineering
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Engineering
Dale of
Completion
Mitig,ilioll
Complete.Dillcd
and Verillcd
RANCHO DEL REY SPA ill
MITIGATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM
(Continued)
Task
Time Frame
Drainage/Groundwater!
Water Ouality
Insure that project is in con- Occupancy Permit
formance with NPDES regula-
tions regarding storm water
discharge.
Landform Alteration!
Aesthetics
Implement community design Final Map
guidelines detailed in SPA ill
plan.
Implement grading standards Tentative Map
outlined in the ERDR and SPA
III plan and the City's design
guidelines.
Review and approve the Final Final Map
Map for consistency with adopt-
ed grading and design guide-
lines.
Review fInal grading plans to Grading Permit
confirm that the design stan-
dards have been included in the
grading plan.
Submit fmal landscape plan Grading Permit
prepared by a licensed land-
scape architect for approval.
Air Quality
Provide bicycle facilities, in. Tentative Map
eluding bicycle lanes and secure
storage facilities at all public
facilities within the project area.
Provide mass transit accom-
modations including bus shelter Tentative Map
and bus turnouts and a transit
stop in front of the retirement
conUTIunity on East H Street.
Responsible for
Task
Applicant
Applicant
Applicant
Applicant
Applicant
Applicant
Applicant
Applicant
3/-"JBS
Responsible for
Verification
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Engineering
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Planning
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Engineering
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Engineering
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Planning
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Planning
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Planning
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Planning
Date of
Completion
Miligaliull
Compll..:lc.D<lll.:d
anJ Vl..:rifil.'d
RANCHO DEL REY SPA ill
MITIGATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM
(Continued)
Task
Air Ouality (Continued)
Time Frame
Implement mitigation measures Tentative Map
to reduce potential for air pollu-
tion "hot spots" at intersections.
Adhere to recommendation Tentative Map
made by the 1982 SIP regarding
local participation in air emis-
sion reduction measures and the ".
forthcoming San Diego Air
Quality Plan.
Bioloev
Monitor grading to reduce im-
pacts to coastal sage scrub
habitat.
Hand clear fire buffers that
encroach into open space areas.
Revegetate open space areas
and areas impacted by sewer
laterals with coastal sage scrub
species native to the site.
Insure that biologist has been
retained to devise revegetation
program and that a five-year
revegetation program has been
designed that is acceptable to
City staff.
Position sewer laterals to cause
minimum impacts to biological
resources.
Locate staging areas for con-
struction to minimize impacls to
sensitive biological resources.
Slake sewer installation cor-
ridors prior to design finaliza-
tion. Adjust corridors ifreques-
led by monitoring biologist
Grading Permi t
Grading Permit
Prior to issuance of
Building Permit
Grading Permit
Grading Permit
Grading Permit
Grading Permit
Responsible for
Task
Applicant
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Planning
Applicant/Biological
Consultant
Applicant
Appl icant/Biological
Consultant
Applicant
A ppl icantlB io logical
Consultant
A ppl icantlBio logical
Consultant
ApplicantlB iological
Consultant
31-~'i~
Responsible for
Verification
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Planning
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Planning
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Planning
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Planning
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Planning
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Planning
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Planning
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Planning
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Planning
Date of
Completion
MiligallOJl
Complclc.Dnll'd
and Vcritil'd
RANCHO DEL REY SPA ill
MITIGATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM
(Continued)
Task
Biologv (Continued)
Design and implement moni-
toring program to determine the
effecl of lbe SPA ill develop-
ment on the population of Cali-
fornia gnatcatchers.
Design and incorporate project-
wide revegetation plan that
includes a transplant program
for cacti and a five year mau1te-
Dance and monitoring plan.
Acquire and preserve an area of
coastal sage scrub habitat to
reduce impacts to the California
gnatcatcher according to condi-
tions established in the SPA ill
EIR.
Evaluate mitigation site for use
by California gnatcatcher.
Approve gnatcatcher mitigation
site. ..
Insure that gnatcatcher mitiga-
tion site is within, adjacent to or
connected by an appropriate
landscape canidar to a larger
area or interconnected set of
patches of habitat lbat are cur-
rently in public ownership or
designated open space or rea-
sonably expected to remain in a
natural stale. The habitat would
be 800-1,000 acres.
Prohibit grading activities which
would adversely affect the habi-
tat of the specialty housing area.
Dedicate off-site acquisition!
mitigation site to the responsible
public agency.
Time Frame
Final Map
Final Map
Tentative Map
Tentative Map
Tentative Map
Tentative Map
Prior to issuance of
Grading Permit
Grading Penni t
Responsible for
Task
Applicant/Biological
Consultant
Applicant/Biological
Consultant
Applicant/Biological
Consultant
A ppl ic an t/B io logical
Consultant
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of PI arming,
USFWS, CDFG
Applicant/B iological
Consultant
A ppl icant/B i 0 logical
Consultant
Applicant
~/- ~i?-
Responsible far
Verification
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Planning
ChuIa Vista Depart-
ment of Planning
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Planning
ChuIa Vista Depart-
ment of Planning
Chuta Vista Depart-
ment of Planning
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Planning
Chula Vista DepaTl-
ment of Plarming
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Planning
Date of
Completion
Miligl'llian
CamplCIl.:.Dall.:d
and Vcrifil:d
RANCHO DEL REY SPA III
MITIGATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM
(Continued)
Task
Biolo~v (Continued)
Time Frame
Responsible for
Task
Responsible for
Verification
Applicant
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Planning
Record a conservation easement Grading Permit
with an agency of appropriate
jurisdiction oyer the off-site
mitigation area if ownership of
the mitigation site does not
transfer prior to issuance of a
grading permit-
Implement gnatcatcher mitiga-
tion program.
Acquire and preserve 0.4 acres
of vernal pool associated lands
that is acceptable to the City of
Chula Vista and the USFWS.
Prepare and implement vernal
pool restoration plan if miti-
gation site requires restoration.
Prohibit grading in RDR SPA
III vernal pool area prior to
accomplishing the off-site ac-
quisition.
Fence off vernal pool mitigation
site with a six-fOOl chain-link
fence inunediately upon acquisi-
tion of the site.
Secure a U.S. Army Corps
Nationwide permit.
Dedicate the off-site acqUisI-
tion/mitigation vernal pool site
to the appropriate public agen-
cy.
Conduct spring survey and
implement vernal pool mitiga-
tion program.
Secure a Streambed Alteration
Agreement as stated under Sec-
tion 1602-1603 of the California
Fish and Game Code, for pro-
posed access road (Paseo Ran-
chero).
Chula Vista Depart-
Applicant ment of Planning
Tentative Map
Chula Vista Depart -
Applicant ment of Planning
Grading Permit
Chula Vista Depart.
A ppl icant/B i 0 logical ment of Planning
Grading Permit Consultant
Chula Vista Depart-
Applicant ment of Planning
Grading Permit
Chula Vista Depart-
Applicant ment of Planning
Grading Permit
Chula Vista Depan-
Applicant/Biological ment of Planning
Grading Permit Consultant
Chula Vista Depart-
Applicant ment of Planning
Grading Permit
Chula Vista Depart-
A ppl icant/B i 0 log ical ment of PlannIng
Grading Permit Consultant
Chula Vista Depart-
A ppl icant/B io I 0 gica I ment of Planning
Grading Permit Consultant
3/-~'iV
Dale of
Complelion
Mjligaliull
Complt::lc.Dult:J
ilnd Verili~d
RANCHO DEL REY SPA III
MITIGATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM
(Continued)
Task
Responsible for
Task
Time Frame
Cultural Resources
Examine existing surface collec- Tentative Map
tion for Site SDi-960/ 961.
Applicant/Cultural
Resource Consultant
Perform a detailed grid-con- Tentative Map
trolled surface collection to
collect any artifacts remaining
on the surface site and collect
broken cobbles to evaluate
whether or not they are of hu-
man manufacture for Site SDi-
960/961.
Applicant/Cultural
Resource Consultant
Record surface disturbance and Tentative Map
document with mapping and
photographs for Site SDi-
960/961.
Applicant/Cultural
Resource Consultant
Investigate mirna mounds of Tentative Map
Site SDi-960/961 to see whether
the artifacts or broken cobbles
are incorporated into the
mounds, are found on the sur.
faces under the mounds, or are
absent from the mounds.
Appl icant/Cultural
Resource Consultant
Retain qualified geomorpholo- Tentativ~ Map
gist to examine Site SDi960/
961 to analyze the site setting,
age, and stratigraphic integrity
of the mima mounds.
Applicant/Cultural
Resource Consultant
Wash, catalogue, and analyze Tentative Map
collected material from Site
SDi-960/961.
Appl ic ant/Cultural
Resource Consultant
Analyze site SDi-9893 through Tentative Map
the excavation of 25 1x 1 meter
test units to determine how
much of the site would be exca-
vated, and excavate a total of
150 meters of backhoe trenches
to search for potential hearth
features.
Applicant/Cultural
Resource Consultant
31-~~"
Responsible for
Verification
Chula Vista Depart.
ment of Planning
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Planning
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Planning
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Plaruling
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Planning
Chula Vista Depan-
ment of Planning
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Planning
Dale of
Complelion
Mitig~lIiOJl
Comph.=lc.l.)al....,:
and Verifi....J
RANCHO DEL REY SPA ill
MITIGATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM
(Continued)
Task
Time Frame
Cultural Resources (Continued)
Prepare reports detailing the Tentative Map
investigations of both sites and
submit to the City of Cbula
Vista, SDSU Clearing-house,
and The Museum of Man.
Transportation
Signalize Telegraph Canyon Final Map, Phase I
Road and Paseo Ladera.
Open south leg of East H Final Map, Phase I
Street!East Business Park Road
intersection where Phase I traf-
fic is assumed to enter and exit.
Construct Paseo Ranchero be- Final Map, Phase 2
tween H Street and Telegraph
Canyon Road.
Extend ] Street to provide a Final Map, Phase 2
through two-lane road between
Paseo del Rey and Paseo Ran-
chero.
Place stop sign controls on Final Map, Phase 2
Paseo Ladera at East ] Street,
East J Street at Paseo Ranchero,
and Paseo Ranchero at Tele-
graph Canyon Road.
Signalize Telegraph Canyon and Final Map, Phase 3
Paseo Ranchero.
Complaince with ECVTPP for Final Map, all phases
current and future updates to
maintain acceptable levels of
service on all affected intersec-
tions and roadway segments.
Responsible for
Task
Applicant/Cultural
Resource Consultant
Applicant
Applicant
Applicant
Applicant
Applicant
Applicant
Applicant
3/-.2'0
Responsible for
Verification
Chuta Vista Depart.
ment of Plaruling
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Planning
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Planning
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Planning
Chula Vista DepaTl-
ment Planning
Chula Vista DepaTl.
ment of Planning
Chula Vista Depart-
ment Planning
Chula Vista Depart.
ment Planning/City
Traffic Engineer
Date of
Complelion
Mitigation
COlllpkll',Oalnl
and V~rilil.'J
RANCHO DEL REY SPA III
MITIGATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM
(Continued)
Task
Responsible for
Task
Responsible for
Verification
Time Frame
Parks. Recreation and Open
Space
Provide a detailed concept plan Tentative Map
for proposed park.
Applicant
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Parks and
Recreation and Parks
and Recreation Com-
mission
Design 4:1 slopes or less for Tentative Map
park.
Applicant
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Parks and
Recreation
Enter in an agreement with the Tentative Map
Sweetwater Union High School
District and the City of Chula
Vista to insure public access to
the recreational amenities of the
proposed junior high school
which would include soccer
fields, basketball courts, and
tennis courts.
Applicant
Chula Vista Depart-
mem of Parks and
Recreation
Provide funding for the differ- Tentative Map Applicant Chula Vista Depart-
coce in cost between facilities ment of Parks and
built to school standards and Recreation
facilities built to City standards.
Design and construct recrea- Tentative Map Applicant Chula Vista Depart-
lional facilities to City of Chula ment of Parks and
Vista standards and in consul- Recreation
tation with City staff.
Design park so that it would not Tentative Map Applicant Chula Vista Depart-
be isolated with only backs of ment of Parks and
buildings facing onto the park. Recreation
Design park to provide adequate Tentative Map Applicant Chula Vista Depart-
visibility from East I Street ment of Parks and
Recreation
Provide access to the school Tentative Map Applicant
parking lot for overflow parking Chula Vista Deparl-
from park, ment of Parks and
Recreation
3/- ~91
Dale of
Completion
Miligilliull
CUll1pll..:lc.l);IIl.'~!
;lIld Vcrifil..:d
RANCHO DEL REY SPA III
MITIGATION AND MONITORING PROGRAM
(Continued)
Task
Time Frame
Services and Utilities
Provide a water service letter Building Pennit
from the Otay Water District
which includes a construction
schedule of reservoir, mains,
and hydrants to be included on
the project.
Design and implement a pro- Building Permit
jecl-wide water conseIVation
program through the use of
infrastructure that minimizes
water use.
Review project-related projected Building Permit
sewage flows and volumes for
compliance with Ciry Engin-
eering Standards.
Hire 4.6 additional police per- Occupancy Pennit
sonne!.
Hire one Fire Inspector. Building Permit
Participate in Mello RODS Com- Tentative Map
munity Facilities Districts estab-
lished by the Chula Vista City
School District and the Sweet-
water Union High
Responsible for
Task
Applicant
Applicant
Applicant
City of Chula Vista
Police Department
Chula Vista Fire Pre-
vention Bureau
Applicant
Responsible for
Verification
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Engineering
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Engineering
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Engineering
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Planning
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Planning
Chula Vista Depart-
ment of Planning
31- ~9~
Date of
Completion
Mitigation
CompJ~tl.:.Uall'll
and Verilil.:d
" ,
.~
RANCHO DEL REY SPA II and SPA III
AIR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN
SUBMITTAL DRAFT
January 28, 1991
Revision #1 (4/25/91)
Prepared for:
Rancho del Rey Partnership
2727 Hoover Avenue
National City, CA 92050
Prepared by;
CINTI & ASSOCIATES
1133 Columbia street #201
San Diego, CA 92101
(619) 239-1815
31- ~f'3
"
Table of Contents
Paqe
I.. EXECtJTIVE SUMJ.1ARY.................................................................. 1
II.. INTRODUC'rION.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 3
A. Purpose
B. Planning Context
C. Goals
D. Approach
E. Roles and Responsibilities
III. AIR QUALITY LEGISLATION AND PLANS................. 8
A. Background
B. Air Quality Plan Requirements
C. Transportation Control Measures
D. Indirect Source Regulations
E. Other Planning Programs Affecting Air Quality
IV. AIR QUALITY IMPACTS............................... 15
A. Existing Climate/Air Quality Conditions
B. Project Air Quality Impacts
V. AIR QUALITY MITIGATION MEASURES................... 24
VI. MONITORING/CONCLUSIONS............................ 26
VII. REFERENCES............................................................................... 27
i
3/- ~,.y
"
X. EXECUTXVE SUMMARY
The purpose of this Air Quality Improvement Plan is to respond to
the Growth Management Policies of the City of Chula Vista. The
most significant air quality improvement measures are those
policies and regulations established at the broadest geographic
level, ie. state and Federal. However, there are measures that can
be applied on a City or project level which can have a positive
impact. This report presents an overview of these issues, and
offers the following improvement measures which are to be imple-
mented at the local level.
1. Pedestrian and Bicvcle Paths: The Specific Plan, and
subsequent SPA Plans, adopted by the City have emphasized the
use of an extensive trail system, connecting activity centers,
to enable non-vehicular travel. There has also been a
suggestion that programs to encourage pedestrian and bicycle
travel could be applied, such as reduced parking availability
at retail centers. These concepts would require City-wide
debate to fully appreciate competing goals, and are not
applicable at the project level.
2. Jobs/Housinq Balance: The Specific Plan adopted by the City
has included job opportunities within this community. While
intensification of the Business Center could meet some local
opposition, the implementation of this employment base should
be encouraged to facilitate local employment opportunities.
3. Access To Reqional Svstems: The LOS requirements applied to
Rancho del Rey will encourage free-flow travel, which reduces
air emissions. However, there are those who argue that
transit use is actually enhanced by congestion. These
competing approaches to air quality improvements needs to be
reviewed as City-wide policy to determine the appropriate
balance.
4. Transit Access: The project circulation will improve routes
for transit, especially by connecting Telegraph canyon Road
to East "H" Street via Pas eo Ranchero. Transit stops can be
incorporated where desired at key intersections without
significant plan modification. The Specialty Housing Area,
envisioned for senior housing, is especially well suited for
transit stops and includes an extensive trail access system.
5. Educational Proqrams: The developer will participate in an
educational program for residents of Rancho del Rey. This
program could also be coordinated as part of a larger city-
wide program to inform residents of the services and alterna-
tive transportation options available to them.
(04/25/91)
1
3/- ;;'5
..
6. Park-and-Ride Facilities: The potential for providing a Park-
and-Ride facility in proximity to the project exists. Cal
trans currently has a site in Terra Nova. However, the vacant
city owned parcels, at Terra Nova at East "HI! street and Paseo
Ranchero at East "H" Street, are in the preferable A.M. west
bound location. Such a Park-and-Ride facility could also
provide a staging area for carpools, vanpools, and transit
vehicles.
7. Local and Reaional Air Qualitv Reaulations: A new Air Quality
Plan will supersede the 1982 SIP. This plan, which is
projected for adoption prior to the implementation of SPA III
development, will include increased standards and regulatory
measures to mitigate this as well as other anticipated growth
in the San Diego Air Basin. Rancho del Rey will be subject
to compliance with these regulations and mitigation measures
as they evolve.
8. Develooment Monitorina: The Design Review process provides
a point for monitoring the inclusion of on-site transit stops
and trail linkages. In addition, this development will be
subject to the ongoing monitoring programs inherent in the
City's Transportation Phasing Plan and Growth Management
Program.
These local mitigation measures might have a minimal impact on Air
Quality in quantifiable terms, but their enhancement of future
transit options and public awareness should have a greater long
term public benefit.
(04/25/91)
2
3/- ~'"
"
:I:I. :IJlTRODUCT:ION
A. Purpose
The purpose of this Air Quality Improvement Plan for the
Rancho del Rey SPA II and SPA III projects is to respond to
the Growth Management Policies of the City of Chula Vista.
As described below, these policies are the culmination of a
long term, comprehensive planning process.
The City of Chula Vista has looked comprehensively at issues
dealing with development and the additional impacts it places
on public facilities and services. The approval of the
Threshold Ordinance and the General Plan update were the first
steps in the overall process of addressing growth related
issues. The second step in this process was the development
and adoption of the Growth Management Element which set the
stage for the creation of the Growth Management Program.
The Growth Management Program is the final component in the
ci ty' s effort to create a comprehensive system to manage
future growth. This program implements the Growth Management
Element of the General Plan and establishes an orderly process
to carry out the development policies of the City. It directs
and coordinates future growth patterns and rates to guarantee
the timely provision of public facilities and services. The
primary area of focus of the Growth Management Program is east
of 1-805 where most of the remaining vacant land is located,
including the project sites.
B. Planning Context
The planning context for this air quality plan ranges from
state-wide and regional considerations to local planning
requirements. SANDAG'S draft Quality of Life Standards and
Objectives, prepared by the Regional Growth Management
Technical Committee, consist of eight factors including air
quality and water, sewage disposal, sensitive lands protec-
tion, solid waste management, toxic and hazardous waste
management, transportation system management, and housing.
These regional standards and objectives are based on State
and Federal law and at a minimum, must be carried out on a
regional level by agencies such as APCD, Regional Water
Quality Control Board, County Water Authority, etc. The
strategies to be included in the Regional Growth Management
Strategy are of necessity long term in nature and will involve
every city and special district in this county.
At the local level, cities and special districts must carry
out their fair-share responsibilities within a day-to-day
(04/25/91)
3
3,-0l'fr
decision making framework to ensure attainment of the regional
standards and objectives. Many of the regional standards and
objectives that will involve Chula vista and other cities are
the provisions of the California Clean Air Act and the San
Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) water availability
standards addressing supply, storage, conservation and
reclamation. Chula vista is actively participating, through
the growth management program and other efforts, in the
regional endeavor to establish effective long term regional
strategies to implement the air quality and water standards
and objectives.
The SANDAG Quality of Life Standards and Objectives regard-
ing air quality, transportation system management (TSM) and
transportation demand management (TDM) incorporate Federal
and State Air Quality Standards. The California Air Resour-
ces Board (ARB) has classified the San Diego region as having
a severe air pollution problem because the region will not
comply with State standards until some time after 1997.
According to the San Diego Air Pollution Control District
(APCD), the major sources of air pollutants in the region are
motor vehicles and pollution blown in from Los Angeles. Given
this situation, local air quality improvement efforts are
focused on transportation issues. To address air quality
problems related to transportation, level of service standards
for arterials, highways and transit are being developed, as
are goals for reducing solo auto trips.
Actions necessary to achieve state and federal clean air
standards, and TSM and TDM objectives include:
· reducing solo auto trips by carpooling and using transit
· promoting telecommuting and staggered work schedules
· improving transit service
· building additional high occupancy vehicle lanes
· coordinating traffic signals and implementing other
circulation system improvements
· reducing trip lengths through jobs/housing balance, mixed
use development and focusing development near transit
stations
The regional plans required by State law are now being
prepared by SANDAG and the APCD. Although the areas of focus
are well known, specific guidelines and standards are not
currently available. Thus a direct comparison or evaluation
of the measures included in this plan with the regional
standards cannot be made at this time. However, because of
the residential nature of these projects and the transporta-
tion focus of the specific measures expected to be adopted in
the regional plan, project level consistency is very likely
(04/25/91)
4
3 /- ~'1g
.'
(i.e., specific requirements for residential projects are
expected to be minimal). The following chapter will more
fully detail the basis for this conclusion.
At the local level, within Chula Vista, there is no local air
quality plan. However, the City Council is in the process of
implementing the Growth Management Program which requires Air
Quality Improvement Plans for major development projects (50
residential units or commercial/industrial projects with
equivalent air quality impacts). Because no local plan exists
or is in preparation, project compliance will need to be
measured against the requirements of the regional plan.
This report for the Rancho del Rey SPA II and SPA III projects
has been prepared to meet that policy requirement, in
anticipation of the adoption of the proposed Growth Management
Policy by the Chula vista City Council.
At the present time, no guidelines for such plans have been
adopted. As the initial project report, this plan is the
first effort to implement the proposed policy and may serve
as an example/guideline for future project reports. It also
represents the first effort to implement the proposed growth
management policies of the City of Chula vista.
C. Goals
The following are goals of the SPA II and SPA III Air Quality
Improvement Plan:
1. To minimize air quality impacts during and after
construction of the SPA II and SPA III projects.
2. To comply with the air quality standards and policies of
the city of Chula vista and San Diego County APCD.
3. To create a framework for the design and implementation
of air quality mitigation measures in these residential
development projects.
4. To be economically efficient and cost effective.
D. Approach
~he approach to air quality mitigation outlined in this plan
1S focused on the strategies and measures available to
residential development projects. As will be described in
the next chapter, few transportation/air quality improvements
measures in the State and regional plans are addressed to
these projects. The majority address transportation system
efficiency, alternative transportation modes, heavy vehicle
(04/25/91)
5
31-.J.'1~
.'
restrictions, and increased vehicle occupancy. None of these
are directly influenced or effected by residential develop-
ment. Some measures are available however, and these are
described and incorporated into the project as appropriate.
These include integration of land uses, construction of
facilities to support pUblic transportation, and the provision
of private group transportation where feasible. Efforts to
educate and increase awareness of the need to minimize air
quality impacts and the opportunities to do so, will be
directed toward future residents. The roles and responsibili-
ties of all affected parties are described in the following
section.
B. Roles and Responsibilities
In order for this plan to be effective, it is necessary to
clearly assign appropriate roles and responsibilities to all
of the participants in the development and occupancy phases
of the SPA II and SPA III projects. There are three primary
groups involved: developer/builders; government/service
agencies; and future residents. Each has an important role
to play, as described below.
1. Developer/Builders
The community developer, the Rancho del Rey Partnership, is
providing the basic planning, design, and management of this
program. community level transportation facilities, vehicu-
lar and non-vehicular, will be implemented by the master
developer.
Individual builders will construct homes according to the
standards set by the master developer (and the City) and will
be responsible for energy planning and management within their
own project. Builders will also be the primary communicators
with homebuyers. In this role, they will be responsible for
identifying the energy conservation features incorporated in
the project, and educating homebuyers regarding a continuing
conservation effort.
2. Propertv Owners/Residents
The long term success of the air quality mitigation effort
rests with residents who choose their own modes of transporta-
tion, driving habits and lifestyles. In the aggregate,
choices by residents affect the air quality in the region more
than any effort by the city or developer.
Generally, commercial and industrial are the land uses which
have significant opportunities to incorporate air quality/
transportation mitigation measures because of the concentrated
(04/25/91)
6
3/-3DO
number of automobile trips associated with them. The decision
to utilize public transit or non-vehicular transportation will
rest with future residents, influenced by the availability
and convenience of such facilities.
3. Government/Service Aqencies
The city of Chula Vista will review project plans and monitor
this plan. Because of its development approval role, the City
can effectively enforce transportation phasing and other
standards for new construction. Some local public transporta-
tion systems are operated under authority of the City, in
cooperation with regional operators. The City can also be a
source of on-going education and air quality awareness through
citizen communication programs.
The San Diego APCD will adopt regional air quality plans which
will implement measures to meet State and Federal standards.
Although these plans will focus primarily on transportation
issues, land use and indirect source guidelines will also be
included. State law prohibits the intrusion of the APCD on
the land use decision authority of the city, so it will be up
to the city to implement any such guidelines.
To a certain extent, the local school districts also have a
role to play based on the transportation they offer to
students. Bussing of students to school facilities, instead
of parent auto trips, can have beneficial effects in the same
way that using public transit for employment commuting reduces
total trips, improving air quality and traffic congestion.
(04/25/91)
7
3/-301
XXX. AXR QUALXTY LEGXSLATXON AND PLANS
A. Backqround
Based on air quality data from the regional air quality
monitoring network, the California Air Resources Board
classified San Diego county as a non-attainment area for the
State Ozone (03) and inhaleable particulate matter (PMIO) air
quality standards. In addition, the western portion of the
county was classified non-attainment for the State Nitrogen
Dioxide (NO;!) and Carbon Monoxide (CO) standards. The eastern
portion of the County is classified attainment for these
standards.
Ozone is the principal pollutant of concern in San Diego
County. Despite considerable reductions in ozone levels
during the past ten years, in 1988 San Diego County exceeded
the federal standard on 45 days and the state standard on 160
days. Pollution transported from the greater Los Angeles area
was responsible for two-thirds of the days over federal
standards and one-half the days over state standards. By
comparison, the state nitrogen dioxide standard was violated
in downtown San Diego on only one day each in 1988 and 1987.
In Escondido, there was also one violation in each of these
years.
Because violations of the CO and NO;! standards are marginal
compared to the significant 03 problem, the principal focus of
the regional air quality effort will directed toward reducing
reactive organic gases and oxides of nitrogen, which are ozone
precursors.
The ARB motor vehicle pollution control program will continue
to provide significant reactive hydrocarbon, oxides of
nitrogen, and CO reductions from motor vehicles. Transporta-
tion control measures will also reduce these emissions. Since
80% of the region's CO and 50% of the NO;! pollution is from
on-road motor vehicles, this combination of measures will
substantially contribute to attaining and maintaining these
two standards. While transportation control measures and
motor vehicle emission controls will be major elements in the
CO and NO;! control program, additional stationary source
control measures may be necessary to control oxides of
nitrogen.
B. Air Quality Plan Requirements
1. Involved Aqencies
The four agencies involved in the air quality planning process
are the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), which is
(04/25/91)
8
31-.30~
responsible for the administration of the federal Clean Air
Act; the state Air Resources Board (ARB), which is responsible
for the implementation of the California Clean Air Act of
1988; the San Diego County Air Pollution Control District
(APCD), which is responsible for the development of the Air
Quality Plan mandated by the State Clean Air Act and for
regulating the emissions in the region; and SANDAG, which is
responsible for the preparation of the transportation control
measures component of the Air Quality Plan. The Plan is to
be consistent with the traffic congestion management and
regional growth management plans also being prepared by
SANDAG. Within this context of a long term strategy to be
carried out by the state and the APCD, Chula vista can also
do its fair share, although it does not have a formal role in
formulating the plan. state law does provide for the
delegation of administration of APCD Regulations to local
agencies if the following conditions are met:
· Measures adopted and implemented are as stringent as the
District's measures.
· The local agencies submitting an implementation plan have
sufficient resources and the District approves the plan.
· The District adopts procedures to audit local agency
performance to insure compliance. The District can
revoke the delegation for inadequate performance.
Any land use provisions of the adopted plan will ultimately
be the responsibility of the City as state law prohibits the
APCD from intruding in this area.
2. Air Qualitv Standards
Attainment of air quality standards is based on federal and
state law which establishes such standards, with the state
standards more strict than federal standards (see Table 1).
Given this situation, compliance with state law will generally
lead to conformance with federal law.
The California Clean Air Act of 1988 requires that each air
district develop and submit a plan by July 1991 Showing how
the district will achieve the mandated standards. In their
plans, the districts must consider all emission sources,
independent of transport into the air basin. Each district
not in attainment of the standards by 1994 must reduce non-
attainment pollutants or their precursors by an average of 5%
per year, beginning from the 1987 levels. The plan must also
demonstrate that improved air quality will be maintained after
attainment; thus, the plan must have provisions for continued
air quality improvement to accommodate growth. The plan must
(04/25/91)
9
31-,303
TABLE 1
AMBIENT AIR QUALITY STANDARDS
Pollutant Averaging California National
Time Standards Standards
Ozone 1 Hour 0.09 ppm 0.12 ppm
Carbon 8 Hour 9.0 ppm 9ppm
Monoxide 1 Hour 20 ppm 35 ppm
Annual 100~g/m3
Nitrogen Average -
Dioxide 1 Hour 0.25 ppm -
Annual 80 ~g/m3
-
Sulfur Average
Dioxide 24 Hour 0.05 ppm 0.14 ppm
1 Hour 0.25 ppm -
Suspended Annual Mean 30 ~g/m3 50 ~g/m3
Particulate
Ma tter
(PM 10) 24 Hour 5Ollg/m3 15Ollg/m3
Sulfates 24 Hour 25llg/m3 -
30 Day Average 1.5Ilg/m3 -
Lead Calendar - 1.51lg/m3
Quarter
Hldro~en 1 Hour 0.03 PPII1 -
ulfi e
Vinyl Chloride 24 Hour 0.010 ppm -
(chloroethene)
Visibility Visibility of 10 -
Reducing 1 Observation miles when
humidity is
.
Particles <70%.
(04/25/91)
10
.3 I - 301/
contain transportation control measures, transportation system
measures, and direct source regulations.
3. Mandated Measures
Because the San Diego region is classified "severe", specific
controls are required by state law. These are: the best
available retrofit control technology for existing sources;
a permitting program that mitigates emission increases from
all new and modified sources; reasonably available transporta-
tion control measures; indirect and area source control
measures; and, specifically, transportation control measures
to hold vehicle emissions constant after 1997 and achieve an
average commute-time ridership of 1.5 persons per vehicle by
1999, and measures to achieve use of a significant number of
low-emission vehicles by fleet-operators.
If the region cannot meet the 5% annual reduction standard,
then the next best level of reduction is to be achieved. The
Act authorizes the ARB to adjust the emission reduction target
for individual areas, if two legal conditions are met. First,
the Plan must include all feasible measures and the region
must be expeditiously implementing the Plan. Based on the
currently available data, the APCD believes that the 5% annual
reduction will not be met and thus the "all feasible measures"
standard will be applied.
C. Transportation Control Measures
In November 1990, the APCD Board adopted criteria for
developing a transportation control measures (TCM) plan. The
plan is being prepared by SANDAG according to the criteria of
APeD, and, once completed (first draft due in March 1991), the
plan will be implemented through district regulations and
transportation system improvements.
The TCM criteria addressed six major areas: transportation
demand management (reduction in number vehicle trips & heavy
duty vehicle restrictions); alternative transportation mode
capacity expansion (public transit, park and ride, high
occupancy vehicle facilities & bicycle/pedestrian facilities);
transportation system management (traffic signals & incident
management); land use (jobs/housing balance, mixed use
development & focused development); market based incentives
(fees & taxes); and, driving restrictions.
Regulations which will be proposed to meet these criteria
could include:
1. Ride sharing and van pool programs.
(04/25/91) 11
3/-,305
2. Employer subsidized transit ticket passes.
3. Flexible work schedules to accommodate ride sharing and .
transit.
4. Telecommuting and teleconferencing.
5. Parking incentives to support ride sharing.
6. Trip management education.
7. Limiting heavy duty truck traffic during peak commute
periods and reducing the number of trips through better
fleet management.
8. Measures to reduce trips to large facilities.
In addition, the Air Quality Plan will contain transportation
system measures to attempt to reduce motor vehicle pollution
utilizing some of the following measures:
1. Adding more high occupancy vehicle by pass ramps and
lanes.
2. Improving transit services.
3. Special bridge toll rates for drivers who ride share.
4. Increase bus fleets and upgrading of vehicles.
5. Development of long range policies supporting vehicle
trip reduction.
D. Indirect Source Regulations
A residential development is considered an indirect source in
that it generates/attracts motor vehicle trips, although the
homes themselves do not directly impact air quality. Because
all feasible measures will be required, indirect source
measures will be included in the Plan. The focus of these
provisions will be to reduce motor vehicle-related emissions,
although measures addressing aspects of development such as
improved energy conservation could be included. Key elements
for indirect source regulation would include the following:
1. New source review and approval prior to construction.
2. Determine if the project is consistent with the APeD Air
Quality Plan.
(04/25/91) 12
3/- 30 h
3. Analysis of the location, distance, time of day, vehicle
occupancy and mode split.
4. Assess the quantity of air pollution which could result
from the project.
5. Require the best available design to reduce trips,
maintain or improve traffic flow, reduce vehicle miles
traveled and implement appropriate transportation control
measures.
6. Define the means for monitoring results.
7. Issue a permit specifying air quality construction and
operating requirements to provide a basis for determining
on going compliance.
8. Incorporate energy conservation measures/opportunities
in new construction.
E. other Planning Programs Affecting Air Quality
As noted earlier, other planning programs are currently
underway which should be coordinated with the Air Quality
Plan. Currently, the city of Chula vista is participating in
the regional effort to implement the transportation demand
ordinance. City staff is evaluating the model transportation
demand ordinance prepared by SANDAG. The near term focus of
the regional transportation demand program will be on the
largest components of the principal traffic stream including
employment travel, college and university student travel, and
goods movement. The objectives for each of the larger traffic
components are as follows:
1. The objectives of the freeway traffic element policies
and programs shall lead to the achievement of a 1.4
average vehicle occupancy rate for all area freeways
during the principal travel period by the year 2000 and
a 1.5 average vehicle occupancy rate by the year 2010.
2. The objectives of the employment traffic element policies
and programs shall lead to the achievement of a 50% drive
alone ratio for region wide employment traffic during the
principal travel period by the year 2000 and 40% drive
along ratio by the year 2010.
3. The objectives of the college and university traffic
element policies and programs shall lead to the achieve-
ment of a 50% student drive along ratio by the year 2000;
and a 40% student drive along ratio by the year 2010.
(04/25/91) 13
at ~ 30 r
4. The objective of the goods movement traffic element
policies and programs shall lead to the achievement of
a 25% reduction in goods movement traffic during the
principle travel period by the year 2000; and a 35%
reduction by the 2010.
violation of the transportation demand management ordinance
as currently proposed may constitute a violation of the
Regional Air Quality Plan.
The basic requirements of the transportation demand management
ordinance will be to require employers to prepare plans to
carry out the objectives of the program and to file annual
reports showing the degree of compliance with said standards.
In addition, each college and university will develop,
implement and promote student commute alternatives in order
to achieve the regional college university student drive along
targets.
Finally, with respect to the goods movement/trucking traffic
element, each business providing goods movement/traffic
trucking services shall develop, implement and promote a non-
peak period delivery program as well as other measures to
further reduce truck traffic during the principal travel
period which is to defined as between 6:30 a.m. to 8:30 a.m.
through 1995 after which time it shall be 6:00 a.m. to 9:00
a.m.
(04/25/91)
14
3/- ~o 8
:IV. A:IR QOAL:ITY :IMPACTS
This chapter discusses the Air Quality Impacts associated with the
Rancho del Rey SPA II and SPA III projects. This type of analysis
is typically included in the Environmental Impact Report (EIR)
prepared for each project. This discussion is based on information
provided in the Supplemental EIR for SPA III prepared by P&D
Technologies and is also applicable to SPA II. The Air Quality
topic was not required to be addressed in the Supplemental EIR for
SPA II. This indicates that the Initial Study for SPA II, prepared
by the City, determined that no significant air quality impacts
would be associated with the project.
A. Existing Climate/Air Quality Conditions
The climate of the Chula vista area, as with all of Southern
California, is controlled largely by the strength and position
of the subtropical high pressure cell over the Pacific Ocean.
It maintains moderate temperatures and lower humidities, and
limits precipitation to a few storms during the winter "wet"
season. Temperatures are normally mild with rare extremes
above 100 degrees Fahrenheit (F) or below freezing. The
annual mean temperature is 62 degrees F.
winds in the City of Chula Vista are almost always driven by
the dominant land/sea breeze circulation system. Regional
wind patterns are dominated by daytime on-shore sea breezes
up to 20 miles per hour with an average of 7 miles per hour.
At night, the wind generally slows and reverses direction,
traveling towards the sea. Wind direction is altered by local
canyons, with winds tending to flow parallel to the canyons.
Chula vista is dominated by the coastal type climate with a
significant amount of oceanic influence on relative humidity.
The relative humidity ranges from 40 percent to 80 percent in
the winter and 30 to 60 percent in the summer. There is an
average of 250 clear (not overcast) days a year.
The on-shore flow of air provides the driving mechanism for
both air pollution transport and dispersion. The winds
described above control the horizontal transport in the
region. The interior valleys of San Diego County also have
numerous temperature inversions that control the vertical
extent through which pollutants can be mixed. When the on-
shore flow of cool, marine air undercuts a large dome of warm,
sinking air within the oceanic high pressure area, it forms
a marine/subsidence inversion. These inversions allow for
good local mixing, but act like a giant lid over the larger
area. As air moves inland, sources add pollution from below
without any dilution from above. The boundary between the
cool air near the surface and the warm air aloft is a zone
(04/25/91)
15
.3 I - 309
v
where air pollutants become concentrated. As the air moves
inland and meets elevated terrain, inland foothill communities
such as Alpine are exposed to many of the trapped pollutants
within this most polluted part of the inversion layer.
A second inversion type forms when cool air drifts into lower
valleys at night and pools on the valley floor. These
radiation inversions are strongest in winter when nights are
longest and air is coldest. They may lead to stagnation of
ground-level pollution sources such as automobile exhaust near
freeways or major parking facilities.
The proposed project is located in the San Diego Air Basin
and, jurisdictionally, is the responsibility of the San Diego
Air Pollution Control District (SOAPCO) and the California Air
Resources Board (ARB). The SOAPCD sets and enforces regula-
tions for stationary sources in the basin. The ARB is charged
with controlling motor vehicle emissions.
The SDAPCD, in coordination with the San Diego Association of
Governments (SANOAG), has developed and updated the "1982
State Implementation Plan Revision for the San Diego Air
Basin" (SIP). The 1982 plan had the goal of aChieving
healthful levels of air quality by 1987, mandated by state and
federal laws; however, with the passage in time of the 1987
attainment deadline, a call for a new post-1987 SIP has been
issued by the Environmental Protection Agency. Included in
the SIP plan are new stationary and mobile source controls;
carpooling, vanpooling, and other ride-sharing programs; and
energy conservation measures. The air plan is designed to
accommodate a moderate amount of new development and growth
throughout the basin. This air quality planning document is
based on SANOAG's adopted Series V regional growth forecasts.
The document is being revised using the Series VII regional
growth forecasts and to meet the requirements of the State
Clean Air Act, as described in the previous chapter.
To assess the air quality impact of the proposed project, that
impact, together with the baseline air quality levels, must
be compared to the Ambient Air Quality Standards (AAQS).
These standards are the levels of air quality considered safe,
to protect the public health and welfare.
The Clean Air Act Amendment of 1970 first established national
AAQS. States retained the option to adopt more stringent
standards or to include other pollution categories. Because
California already had standards in existence prior to 1970
and because of unique meteorological problems in California,
there is considerable diversity between state and federal
clean air standards. The standards currently in effect in
California are shown in Table 1.
(04/25/91)
16
.31-~/O
I
Air quality at any site is dependent on the regional air
quality and local pollutant sources. Regional air quality is
determined by the release of pollutants throughout the air
basin. Within the San Diego Air Basin, it has been calculated
that mobile sources are the major source of regional emissions
and are responsible for approximately 73 percent of the smog
emissions in San Diego County ("Climate and Smog in San Diego
County", SDAPCD).
The air monitoring station closest to the project sites,
operated by the SDAPCD, is on H Street in Chula Vista. The
data collected at this station is considered to be representa-
tive of the air quality experienced in the vicinity of the
projects. Air quality data for 1983 through 1988 for the
Chula vista station is provided in Table 2.
The air quality data indicate that ozone is the air pollutant
of primary concern in the project area. Ozone is a secondary
pollutant; it is not directly emitted. Ozone is the result
of the chemical reactions of other pollutants, most important-
ly hydrocarbons and nitrogen dioxide, in the presence of
bright sunlight. Pollutants emitted from morning rush hour
traffic react to produce the oxidant concentrations experien-
ced in Chula Vista. Ozone is the primary component of the
photochemical oxidants and it takes several hours for the
photochemical process to yield ozone levels which exceed the
standard. All areas of the San Diego County Air Basin
contribute to the ozone levels experienced at Chula Vista,
with the more significant areas being those directly upwind.
The ozone levels at Chula vista have not significantly
increased or decreased over the last six years. On occasion
the wind and weather patterns are such that oxidants produced
in Los Angeles County are blown southward contributing to the
smog level readings in San Diego County.
Particulate matter (PMIO) refers to suspended particulates
which are respirable. PM10 levels in the area are due to
natural sources, grading operations, and motor vehicles. The
federal standards for particulates have not been exceeded at
the Chula vista station since before 1982.
The carbon monoxide standards have not been exceeded over the
past several years, although no clear trend in maximum carbon
monoxide concentrations is evident. Carbon monoxide is
generally considered to be a local pollutant. That is, carbon
monoxide is directly emitted from several sources (most
notably motor vehicles), and the highest concentrations
experienced are directly adjacent to the source.
(04/25/91)
17
3/- .311
~
Table 2
Air Quality Levels Measured at Chula vista
Ambient Air Monitoring station 1983-88
Max. Days Fed. Std.
Pollutant CA Std. Fed. Std. Year Level Exceeded
Ozone 0.1 ppm* 0.12 ppm 1983 0.21 6
for 1 hr. for 1 hr. 1984 0.15 4
1985 0.20 4
1986 0.14 2
1987 0.16 2
1988 0.22 4
Suspended 50 "g/m3 150 "g/m3 1983 103 0
Particulate for 24 hr for 24 hr 1984 88 0
1985 96 0
1986 119 0
1987 100 0
1988 109 0
CO 9 ppm 9 ppm 1983 9 0
for 8 hr for 8 hr 1984 7 0
1985 7 0
1986 7 0
1987 7 0
1988 8 0
N02 0.25 ppm 0.05 ppm 1983 .18 0
for 1 hr annual avg. 1984 .20 0
1985 .16 0
1986 .14 0
1987 .15 0
1988 .21 0
*ppm = parts per million
Source: P&D Technologies (1990)
(04/25/91)
18
3 I - 3/2
A
Lead and sulfur oxide levels are also well below state and
federal standards. Sulfur oxide levels are not exceeded
anywhere in the San Diego Air Basin, primarily because of the
lack of major industrial sources. Due to the introduction and
increased usage of unleaded gasoline, lead concentrations are
now well below the federal and state standards throughout the
basin.
B. Project Air Quality Xmpacts
The development of the SPA II Project would generate approxi-
mately 5,670 daily automobile trips while the SPA III project
would generate approximately 11,405 daily trips. These trips
would result in increased air emissions on new and existing
roadways. Institutional facilities such as schools could also
increase project related emissions. Short-term emissions from
construction activities would generate dust and diesel
emissions resulting in short-term emissions impacts.
1. Construction Impacts
Soil disturbance to prepare the project site would generate
fugitive dust during the construction phase. Soil dust is
typically chemically inert and much of the dust is comprised
of large particles that are readily filtered by human
breathing passages and also settle out on nearby surfaces.
It comprises more of a potential soiling nuisance than an
adverse air quality impact.
Construction activities for large development projects are
estimated by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency to add
1. 2 tons of fugi ti ve dust per acre of soil per month of
activity. If water or other soil stabilizers are used to
control dust, the emissions can be reduced by up to 50
percent. However, fugitive dust control using water must be
balanced against the need to conserve water resources.
CUrrently, water conservation has taken priority. While there
would be project related dust emission levels during construc-
tion, the air quality impact would be minimal.
In addition to fugitive dust, construction activities would
also cause combustion emissions to be released from on-site
construction equipment and from off-site vehicles hauling
materials. Heavy duty equipment emissions are difficult to
quantify because of day-to-day variability in construction
activities and equipment used. Typical emission rates for a
diesel powered scraper are provided in Table 3, and were
obtained from the San Dieqo Air Qualitv Manaqement Division
Air Qualitv Handbook (April 1987). A diesel powered scraper
is the most common equipment used for grading operations.
(04/25/91)
19
31 - 3/~
.'
Table 3
Emission Rates for Grading scraper
POLLUTANT
EMISSION RATE (Grams/8 Hr.l
Carbon monoxide
Nitrogen oxides
Hydrocarbons
Sulfur oxides
Particulates
5,280
22,560
2,272
1,680
1,472
The emission rates above are provided in grams per 8-hour day.
To provide a regional perspective of construction emissions
generated by projects, the projected emissions for San Diego
County (Year 2000) have been provided for comparison. These
emissions are based on construction of planned land uses and
regional transportation facilities consistent with the input
data for the forthcoming Air Quality Plan, and are given in
units of tons/day (Table 4). [909,091 grams = 1 ton)
2. Mobile Source Impacts
Impacts to air quality result primarily from automobile
emissions. The proposed project would result in an increase
in air emissions. If future development has been anticipated
in the 1982 SIP then air quality impacts are considered
mitigated by adherence to the measures as outlined in the SIP.
The proposed projects are consistent with SANDAG Series VII
projections, while the 1982 SIP is based on Series V projec-
tions. Typically, Series VII projections are higher than
Series V. Adherence to the policies and measures in the 1982
SIP may result in some residual impacts as not all growth has
been anticipated. However, the air quality planning process
now underway utilizes the Series VII projections and will
result in a new Air Quality Plan that will supersede the 1982
SIP. with adoption of the new plan, the projects will be in
conformance with the regional air quality plan. This plan
will include increased standards and regulatory measures based
on the anticipated growth. Because the new plan includes the
projects in its baseline information, project impacts would
no longer be considered significant.
Although not included in the EIR analysis, project air quality
impacts can be estimated. Emissions associated with the SPA
II and SPA III are presented in Table 5. The figures can be
compared with the regional daily totals provided in Table 4
earlier. The calculation is utilizes per dwelling unit
factors from Guidelines for the Preparation of Air Oualitv
(04/25/91)
20
31,gJY
"
Table ..
San Oi.qo Air Basin Emission Inventory SUDIIIlary
(tons/day)
(Preliminary Data)
SOURCES 1987 2000
Reactive Orqanic Gases (ROG)
Solvent Use 73.81 (27%) 106.63 (43%)
Other stationary Sources 27.54 (10%) 36.23 (15%)
Lt. Duty Passenger Vehicles 107.10 (39%) 49.38 (20%)
Other On-road Vehicles 47.98 (18%) 29.86 (12%)
Other Mobile Sources 18.07 ( 6%) 24.70 (10%)
Total ROG 274.50 246.80
Oxides of Nitroqen NOx
All Stationary Sources 36.47 (15%) 55.97 (22%)
Lt. Duty Passenger Vehicles 76.52 (31%) 41.49 (16%)
Other On-road Vehicles 65.50 (26%) 64.92 (25%)
Ships 51. 98 (21%) 71.42 (28%)
Other Mobile Sources 18.08 (7%) 24.15 (9%)
TOTAL NO" 248.55 257.94
Carbon Monoxide (CO)
Fuel Combustion 46.03 (3%) 60.25 (6%)
Other Stationary Sources 10.52 (1%) 13.22 (1%)
Lt. Duty Passenger Vehicles 870.33 (61%) 519.66 (51%)
Other On-road Vehicles 402.64 (28%) 290.94 (29%)
Other Mobile Sources 97.08 (7%) 134.29 (9%)
TOTAL CO 1,426.60 1,018.37
Nitroqen Dioxide CN021
Fuel Combustion 42.16 (17%) 63.55 (25%)
Other Stationary Sources 1. 50 (1%) 2.00 (1%)
Lt. Duty Passenger Vehicles 70.63 (29%) 38.43 (15%)
Other On-road Vehicles 57.30 (24%) 56.11 (22%)
Ships 52.83 (22%) 72.59 (28%)
Other Mobile Sources 17.59 (7%) 23.47 (9%)
Total N02 242.01 256.15
(04/25/91)
21
3 I - 3/05
.'
.
Impact Analvses (October 1989) adopted by the Ventura County
APeD.
Ta!:lle 5
Estimated Project Emissions
(Year 2000)
Residential Units
Emission Rate
(lbs./day)*
ROC* * NO
x
Emissions
NO
x
Project
ROC**
SPA II
567 du SFD
0.180
0.188
102 lbs. 107 lbs.
SPA III
792 du SFD 0.180
588 du Retirement 0.094
0.188
0.066
143 lbs. 149 lbs.
55 lbs. 39 lbs.
300 lbs. 295 lbs.
TOTALS
*Emissions from vehicular and non-vehicular sources associated with
residential land uses.
**Reactive Qrganic ~ompounds
Localized air quality impacts can also result from vehicle
emissions. The volume of carbon monoxide released when a
large volume of slow moving vehicles are contained in one
small area can create air pollution "hot spots". Often such
"hot spots" can occur when intersection congestion is LOS D
or below. If traffic on East "H" Street deteriorates to these
levels, potentially significant "hot spots" could result.
3. On-Site Impacts
Emissions from residential activity including painting,
household cleaning, fumigation, gasoline powered lawnmowers,
chemicals associated with swimming pools, wood burning
fireplaces and barbecues, while not considered significant,
would have a cumulative impact on regional air quality.
Emissions from the Junior High School site including the use
of gasoline powered lawnmowers, chemicals associated with
maintenance activities and classroom activities are not
considered significant on a project level, but could have
cumulative impacts on regional air quality. Within the South
Coast Air Basin (Los Angeles area), regulations to prohibit
or restrict these types of air impacts are being adopted. If
similar regulations are adopted in the San Diego region, the
(04/25/91)
22
3/-3JI.
.
.
SOAPeD (or its designee) will enforce compliance, including
the subject projects.
(04/25/91)
23
31-3/?-
.
.
V. AXR QUALXTY MXTXGATXON MEASURES
The primary route to air quality mitigation and reduction of
project impacts to an insignificant level is conformance to the
adopted regional air quality plan. As discussed, the new Air
Quality Plan is now being prepared but specifics are unknown at
this time. To decrease project level emissions, the City of Chula
Vista will adhere to recommendations made by the 1982 SIP and the
forthcoming San Diego Air Quality Plan regarding local participa-
tion in air emission reduction measures.
As is evident from the preceding discussion, the focus of local
air quality improvement measures are local sources (industrial
uses) and transportation behavior. The SPA II and SPA III
projects, as residential developments, are not direct sources.
Thus the project approach is to provide alternative transportation
routes, and in some cases facilities, and encourage and/or educate
residents to use them. Measures currently incorporated in the
project to decrease project-related emissions include:
· The project facilitates the use of alternative transportation
modes by promoting non-vehicular transit usage by project
residents by providing bicycle and pedestrian trails connect-
ing to all local activity centers (e.g., schools, parks,
etc.). All levels of schools (elementary to community
college) are within or adjacent to the Rancho del Rey
Community. A city library, a YMCA, two day care/church
facilities, and a full range of public parks are included
wi thin the community to minimize travel distance and encourage
non-vehicular modes. Community commercial centers are located
within walking distance to the east and west of Rancho del Rey
on East "H" street.
· The land use plan for Rancho del Rey also includes a signifi-
cant business center to potentially reduce commute distances
and maintain an appropriate jobs/housing balance.
· The location of the development projects is in close proximity
to existing major transportation facilities: East "H" street
and 1-805. Both are essentially in-fill projects, utilizing
land which can be most efficiently served by existing
infrastructure, including public and private transportation
(as opposed to "fringe" development which requires extensions
of facilities and does not have support services/land uses in
place).
· The project area is bisected by East "H" Street which is
expected to become a significant public transit corridor. The
business center and other uses fronting this corridor will
make provision for transit stops (bus turnouts, shelters,
etc.) The seniors project may also provide a private transit
(04/25/91)
24
31 - at 'I
.
.
service (mini-bus, etc.) for the convenience of residents of
the retirement community.
· To avoid creation of air pollution "hot spots" at intersec-
tions, transportation phasing measures included in the Growth
Management Plan will be implemented to reduce potentially
significant impacts to air quality. Maintaining the LOS to
C or better will minimize the number of idling cars that are
releasing carbon monoxide into the air. The projects will be
required to comply with the threshold standards adopted by
the City which will maintain acceptable traffic flow. Fee
contributions by the projects will also help fund transporta-
tion system management improvements (signal synchronization,
etc.) planned by the City and funded through development
impact fees.
· To minimize air quality impacts from energy generation plants,
the project will incorporate energy conservation measures as
required by the State. Measures associated with reducing
energy for hot water heating will also contribute to water
conservation efforts.
· As a component of the project water conservation program, an
on-going program of homeowner education/assistance will be
provided by the master developer (or designee). This program
can be expanded to include air quality issues; to provide
education and information to new homeowners who may be
receptive to changing their habits in conjunction with their
move to a new environment.
· In addition, should new or more definitive measures be adopted
for residential development projects, either as a component
of the new regional Air Quality Plan or local regulations,
these measures will be incorporated into the projects.
Because air quality is an issue which can be effectively
addressed only on a regional (air basin) basis, the most
effective approach will be for each and every project to
implement the Air Quality Plan. The Master Developer of SPA
II and SPA III is committed to implementing this Plan in both
projects and expects such provisions to be fully implemented
and/or enforced by the city of Chula Vista.
(04/25/91)
25
3/- ~/'
.. .
VI. MONITORING/CONCLUSION
A. Monitorinq
To assure compliance with project mitigation measures, City
staff will require compliance with the forthcoming San Diego
Air Quality Plan. The City General Plan also includes
policies encouraging adherence to these measures. Prior to
or as a condition of approval of the tentative map, the
project design plan would be reviewed by the City Planning
Department to insure that there are adequate bicycle faciliti-
es on-site, and that area(s) to accommodate mass transit
vehicles are reserved.
Transportation control systems and development/transportation
improvement phasing is also controlled by the City of Chula
Vista through the forthcoming Growth Management Plan. These
measures will address the potential impacts associated with
congested traffic on East "H" Street. The mitigation measures
included in the Transportation Phasing Plan will be imple-
mented before issuance of the occupancy permit per the Public
Facilities Finance Plan.
B. Conclusion/Analysis of Significance
Development of the projects will result in increased traffic
on new and existing roadways and additional air emissions.
Fugitive dust released from construction a short-term nuisance
and would not constitute a significant impact. The develop-
ment of the proposed project is consistent with SANDAG Series
VII projections and not the Series V projections associated
with the 1982 SIP which is considered a significant impact.
The SIP revision, which are currently being initiated using
Series VII projections and which is due by July 1, 1991, will
be completed and adopted prior to build-out. Both projects
will be in compliance with the provisions of the new Air
Quality Plan and impacts are expected to be minimized.
Compliance with the air quality plan would define project
impacts as less than significant.
(04/25/91)
26
.3/- 3:J0
I
\ ... .
VII. RBFERENCES
California Air Resources Board; Answers to Commonly Asked Oues-
tions About the California Clean Air Act's Attainment Plannina
Reauirements (CCAA Guidance Paper #11; August 1989.
California Air Resources Board; California Clean Air Act Trans-
portation Reauirements Guidance (CCAA Guidance Paper #21;
February 1990.
California Air Resources Board; Executive Summarv - California
Clean Air Act Guidance on the Development of Indirect Source
Control proarams; July 1990.
cinti & Associates; Draft SPA Plan Rancho del Rey SPA II;
November 1988.
cinti & Associates; Draft SPA Plan Rancho del Rey SPA III; August
1990.
P&D Technologies; Final Supplemental EIR Rancho del Rey SPA III;
November 1990.
SANDAG; 1991 Air Ouality Plan Development Process (Aaenda Report
R-741; September 28, 1990.
SANDAG; Air Ouality/Transportation Control Measure criteria
(Aaenda Report R-921; November 16, 1990.
SANDAG; Reaional Ouality of Life Factors. Standards and Obiec-
tives (Aaenda Report RB-191; November 16, 1990.
San Diego County Air Pollution Control District; Memorandum:
Transportation Control Measure Criteria; November 21, 1990.
San Diego County Air Pollution Control District; California Clean
Air Act - Air Ouality Strateay Development Workplan; n/d.
Ventura County Air Pollution Control District; Guidelines for the
Preparation of Air Ouality Impact Analyses; October 24, 1989.
willdan Associates and Bud Gray; Draft Growth Manaaement Proaram
- city of Chula Vista; August 1990.
(04/25/91)
27
,j/-3;J/
I
i
.-
RANCHO DEL REY SPA II AND SPA III
WATER CONSERVATION PLAN
SUBMITTAL DRAFT
January 8, 1991
Revision #1 (02/08/91)
Revision #2 (03/25/91)
Prepared for:
Rancho del Rey Partnership
2727 Hoover Avenue
National City, CA 92050
Prepared by;
CINTI & ASSOCIATES
1133 Columbia Street #201
San Diego, CA 92101
(619) 239-1815
~/-.3~~
t
Table of Contents
~
I. EXECUTIVE S~Y....... ......................... .............. 1
II.. INTRODUCTION.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. 4
A. Purpose
B. Planning Context
C. Goals
D. Approach
E. Roles and Responsibilities
III. WATER SERVICE AND SUPPLy.......................... 11
A. Water Sources/Agencies
B. Rancho del Rey SPA II and SPA III Project
Facilities
IV. WATER CONSUMPTION................................. 19
A. Historical Water Use
B. Water Use in Rancho del Rey SPA II and SPA III
V. WATER CONSERVATION MEASURES....................... 22
A. Available On-Site Conservation Measures
B. Conservation Measures Implemented in Rancho
del Rey SPA II and SPA III
C. Projected Water Savings
D. Off-site Conservation Measures
VI. IMPLEMENTATION/MONITORING......................... 33
VII.. REFERENCES................................................................................ 34
APPENDIX - Landscape Water Conservation Outline........ A-I
(partial)
i
31 - 3~.3
.,
x. Executive Summary
The purpose of this Water Conservation Plan for the Rancho del Rey
SPA III project 1s to respond to the Growth Management Policies of
the City of Chula Vista. The water conservation measures presented
. in this plan are intended to respond to the long term need to
conserve water in new development; more stringent short-term,
emergency measures (e.g., water rationing, new meter moratorium,
etc.) responding to drought or water crisis situations are not
included. ~his plan is intended to be implemented over the life
of the project and to establish standards which will be acceptable
to future project residents regardless of water availability.
As detailed in the report, numerous features have been included in
the project and commitments made by the Master Developer to
minimize the use of water during the construction and habitation
of the Rancho del Rey SPA II and SPA III projects. The estimated
water consumption statistics, with and without conservation
measures are outlined in the table below.
Table 1-1
,
Rancho del Rey SPA II and SPA III
Water Consumption/Conservation Summary
Water Consumption Percent
wlo Conserv. wI Conserv. Savinas
Residential SPA II 0.22 MGD* 0.13 MGD 39%
Residential SPA III 0.42 MGD 0.24 MGD 44%
School/Park/Lands capel 0.10 MGD 0.03 MGD 70%
TOTALS 0.74 MGD 0.40 MGD 46%
Averages2
Per capita 140 gal/day 89 gal/day 37%
Per dwelling unit 378 gal/day 240 gal/day 37%
*MGD=million gallons/day
lSavings based on using reclaimed water for irrigation.
2Does not include reclaimed water savings.
(03/25/91)
1
31-3~'I
The water savings summarized above reflect the implementation of
several water conservation measures essentially within the project
boundary. These measures are summarized in Table 1-2. In
addition, the project is committed to fully participate in any off-
site mitigation program adopted by the city. Such a program would
be designed to require new development to off-set all or a portion
of their new water demand by funding or providing water conserva-
tion improvements in older developed areas where efficient plumbing
fixtures or irrigation systems were not installed. Fees collected
could also be spent on studying or acquiring new or improved
sources of water (e.g., expanded water reclamation, desalination,
etc.). Although such a program does not exist at the current time,
considerable work is being completed by several agencies including
the CWA, local water districts, and the city to formulate such a
plan and adoption of a region-wide program is anticipated.
The primary agency responsible for ensuring compliance with this
plan is the city of Chula vista. Requirements for compliance will
be .enforced through tentative map conditions and/or development
agreement provisions, or other appropriate agreements. The
previously approved Mitigation Monitoring Program adopted with
approval of the Rancho del Rey SPA III Plan will be expanded to
monitor compliance with the provisions of this Water Conservation
Plan. Various departments will review and approve plans for
development of these projects. In the course of that review, plans
will be checked for compliance with the provisions of this plan.
The otay Water District will also have a direct role as the water
provider, both potable and reclaimed, to these developments.
Implementation of reclaimed water use on publicly owned property
will be the responsibility of the City (for park and open space
areas) and the Sweetwater Union High School District (for the
junior high school site in SPA III).
(03/25/91)
2
31 - 3;)5
1
Table 1-2
,
Rancho del Rey SPA II and SPA III
Water Conservation Measures
On-Site Measures
Fixtures/Devices
Ultra-low Flow Toilet
Ultra-low Flow Shower Head
Faucet Aerator
Hot Water Pipe Insulation
Pressure Reducing Valves
Water Efficient Dishwasher
Water Efficient Clothes Washer (advise/assist)
outdoors/Landscaping
Efficient Builder Installed Irrigation
Low Water Use Builder Installed Landscaping
Installation of Reclaimed Water Mains
Water Conserving Practices during Grading/Construction
Public Education/Awareness Program
Homebuyer Information Packets
Water Conservation Coordinator
Public Information Seminars
Off-site Measures
Full participation in a City approved water conservation/
mitigation program designed to off-set additional water demand
associated with new construction through the retro-fit of
older, less efficient water fixtures off-site and/or funding
for new supplies or sources of water.
(03/25/91)
3
3/-3:>'"
.
II. Introduction
A. Purpose
The purpose of this Water Conservation Plan for the Rancho
del Rey SPA II and SPA III projects is to respond to the
Growth Management Policies of the City of Chula Vista. As
described below, these policies are the culmination of a long
term, comprehensive planning process. In addition, one of the
conditions of approval of the SPA III Plan is the preparation
and approval of a Water Conservation Plan which mitigates
water supply impacts to an insignificant level, as determined
by the City Council, prior to the approval of the tentative
map for SPA III. Approval of this plan will fulfill that SPA
Plan requirement.
The city of Chula Vista has looked comprehensively at issues
dealing with development and the additional impacts it places
on public facilities and services. The approval of the
Threshold Ordinance and the General Plan update were the first
steps in the overall process of addressing growth related
issues. The second step in this process was the development
and adoption of the Growth Management Element which set the
stage for the creation of the Growth Management Program.
The Growth Management Program is the final component in the
city's effort to create a comprehensive system to manage
future growth. This program implements the Growth Management
Element of the General Plan and establishes an orderly process
to carry out the development policies of the City. It directs
and coordinates future growth patterns and rates to guarantee
the timely provision of public facilities and services. The
primary area of focus of the Growth Management Program is east
of 1-805 where most of the remaining vacant land is located,
including the project site.
B. Planning Context
The planning context for this water conservation plan ranges
from state-wide and regional considerations to local, site
specific requirements. SANDAG'S draft Quality of Life
Standards and Objectives, prepared by the Regional Growth
Management Technical Committee, consist of eight factors
including air quality and water, sewage disposal, sensitive
lands protection, solid waste management, toxic and hazardous
waste management, transportation system management, and
housing. These regional standards and objectives are based
on State and Federal law and at a minimum, must be carried out
on a regional level by agencies such as APCD, Regional Water
Quality Control Board, County Water Authority, etc. The
strategies to be included in the Regional Growth Management
(03/25/91)
4
3/- 3~ .,..
Strategy are of necessity long term in nature and will involve
every city and special district in this county.
At the local level, cities and special districts must carry
out their fair-share responsibilities within a day-to-day
decision making framework to ensure attainment of the regional
standards and objectives. Many of the regional standards and
objectives that will involve Chula vista and other cities are
the provisions of the California Clean Air Act and the San
Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) water availability
standards addressing supply, storage, conservation and
reclamation. Chula Vista is actively participating, through
the growth management program and other efforts, in the
regional endeavor to establish effective long term regional
strategies to implement the air quality and water standards
and objectives.
The SANDAG Quality of Life Standards and Objectives regarding
water availability and conservation include four components:
supply, storage, conservation and reclamation. These four
components can be summarized as follows:
1. A sufficient supply of water should be available to serve
the residents, businesses and institutions in the San
Diego Region.
2.
Per
ed.
196
capita increases in water supply should be stabiliz-
Current daily per capita water use is approximately
gallons.
3. Discharge of effluent into the oceans and streams should
be reduced to achieve the reclamation of 100,000 acre
feet of water per year by 2010.
4. The County Water Authority recommends that its member
agencies be able to operate without water service from
the CWA's aqueducts for up to 10 consecutive days in the
event of an emergency.
In addition to water availability, the following standards
and objectives address water quality:
1. Inland service waters should meet the Federal and State
Standards and Objectives for water quality as regulated
by the Regional Water Control Board.
2. Ground water supply should meet the Federal and State's
standards and objectives for water quality as regulated
by the Regional Water Control Board.
3. Reclaimed water shall be treated to meet the objectives
of the State of California and the Regional Water Control
(03/25/91)
5
]1-.3;)~
-,
Board for discharge in receiving waters, i.e., inland
service waters or ground water to protect the existing
and potential beneficial uses, or for direct use for
landscape and agricultural irrigation.
At the local level, within Chula Vista, the City Council is
in the process of implementing the recommendations of the
Chula Vista Water Task Force. The consensus of the Task Force
was that Chula Vista must playa more active role in all water
related issues. To this end the Task Force has offered the
following recommendations:
1. Chula vista should immediately work to establish a Chula
Vista Interagency Water Commission (IAWC) to deal with
local water related issues.
2. Chula Vista should become more proactive in state and
regional water related issues.
3. Chula Vista should provide adequate support staff for
increased attention to water issues.
4. The City's General Plan, Land Use Plan, Growth Management
Program, and the Master Plans from all appropriate water
agencies should be integrated to reflect short term and
long term goals.
5.
The City should
manuals for the
related measures.
establish ordinances and guideline
implementation of conservation water
6. The City should adopt specific policies in regard to
water related issues. These policies would be the
primary guidance for the council representative to the
Interagency Water Commission, and for the staff water
person for all guidelines, manuals, and plans.
7. Chula Vista, through the Interagency Water Commission,
(IAWC) should work to establish a new water use and
conservation ethic in the IAWC planning area as a model
for all San Diego County.
Among the more significant recommendations of the Water Task
Force which will affect growth management in the future is
recommendation #5 regarding the preparation of a guideline
manual to set forth city policy in regard to water use,
conservation and reclamation for new developments.
In addition, recommendation #6 of the Water Task Force speaks
to the City taking a more active role in promoting conserva-
tion efforts in establishing guidelines for itself and all
(03/25/91)
6
.J1-3,J'
future developments within its jurisdiction to conserve water.
Examples of the conservation techniques suggested include:
1. Low flow toilets and low flow shower heads.
2. Require the insulation of hot water systems in all new
developments and/or upon resale of existing homes.
3. Require mandatory use of reclaimed water where the
appropriate water agency (otay Water District for SPA II
and SPA III) has stated that it either currently has or
will have the ability to develop such water.
4. Require each developer to prepare a water use/conserva-
tion report detailing the programs they propose to
implement to reduce water demand.
The Water Task Force report contains a list of numerous other
recommendations which will be incorporated into the water
conservation program in the future.
In order to implement some of the above, the Planning
Department staff has proposed and Interim Growth Management
Policy with respect to water conservation. In response to #4,
the proposed policy requires that a Water Conservation Plan
be prepared and adopted for all major development projects in
conjunction with SPA Plan approval. This report for the
Rancho del Rey SPA II and SPA III projects has been prepared
to meet that policy requirement, in anticipation of the
adoption of the proposed Growth Management Policy by the Chula
Vista City Council.
At the present time, no guidelines for such plans have been
adopted. As the initial project report, this plan is the
first effort to implement the proposed policy and may serve
as an example/guideline for future project reports. It also
represents the first effort to implement the proposed growth
management policies of the city of Chula Vista.
At the time this report is being prepared (March 1991),
California is facing the fifth year of drought and extreme
water rationing programs are about to go into effect. These
measures require significant changes in the way water is used
by all residents of California, both in homes and industry.
These measures may preclude or substantially restrict new
construction in the short term. Faced with this crisis
situation, long term plans are now being proposed and
formulated to change water policies at many levels of
government to place a greater emphasis on conservation.
It is not the purpose of this plan to incorporate the extreme
short-term measures, rather the plan is intended to represent
(03/25/91)
7
3/-.330
a commitment to the long-term perspective of using water
responsibly while providing for growth, including development
of the SPA II and SPA III projects. Because these long term
programs have yet to be developed, the documentation of
specific provisions, timing, and other requirements cannot be
detailed herein. Only general descriptions and commitments
to implement such plans can be made at this time.
c. Goals
The following are goals of the Rancho del Rey SPA II and SPA
III Water Conservation program:
1. To conserve water during and after construction of the
SPA II and SPA III projects.
2. To comply with the water conservation standards and
policies of the City of Chula Vista and Otay Water
District.
3. To create a comprehensive framework for the design,
implementation and maintenance of water conserving
measures, both indoor and outdoor.
4. To be economically efficient and cost effective.
D. Approach
The approach to water conservation outlined in this plan is
intended to be comprehensive and implemented throughout the
life of the development project. Water conservation during
construction and after occupancy are addressed, as well as
the installation of water conserving landscaping, appliances
and fixtures. Efforts to educate and increase awareness of
the need to conserve water and the opportunities to do so,
will be directed toward_future residents. Project participa-
tion in regional or city-wide water conservation/mitigation
programs to provide additional off-site mitigation is also
anticipated. The roles and responsibilities of all affected
parties are described in the following section.
E. Roles and Responsibilities
In order for this plan to be effective, it is necessary to
clearly assign appropriate roles and responsibilities to all
of the participants in the development and occupancy phases
of the SPA II and SPA III projects. There are three primary
groups involved: developer/builders; government/service
(03/25/91)
8
3/--3311
.'
agencies; and future residents. Each has an important role
to play, as described below.
1. Develooer/Builders
The community developer, the Rancho del Rey Partnership,
is providing the basic planning, design, and management
of this program. Community level facilities, landscaping
and construction standards will be implemented by the
master developer.
Individual builders will construct homes according to
the standards set by the master developer (and the City)
and will be responsible for water planning and management
within their own project. Builders will also be the
primary communicators with homebuyers. In this role, they
will be responsible for identifying the water conserva-
tion features incorporated in the project, and educating
homebuyers regarding a continuing conservation effort.
The builder/developer will also pay fees or make off-
site water conservation retro-fit improvements to comply
with any city-wide or regional water supply mitigation
or improvement program, if such a program is adopted.
2. Prooertv Owners/Residents
The long term success of the conservation effort rests
with property owners who are the long term water users
within the project. Private homeowners, associations,
and public agencies will be responsible for irrigation
and landscape materials on individual lots. Builders
will incorporate water conserving systems and materials
with initial construction but it will be the responsi-
bility of the property owner to maintain these installa-
tions and use water responsibly on a day-to-day basis.
Land uses which have significant irrigation requirements
(schools, parks, landscaped open space) should utilize
reclaimed water as it becomes available. The decision
to utilize reclaimed water will rest with property
owners, which are public agencies (school district and
city) .
3. Government/Service Aaencies
The City of Chula vista will review project plans and
assist in the monitoring of this plan. Because of its
development approval role, the City can effectively
enforce water conservation standards for new construc-
tion. The City can also be a source of on-going
(03/25/91)
9
3/- 3 3 ~
(03/25/91)
education and water awareness through citizen communica-
tion programs.
The city, through the Interagency Water Commission, will
also have a role in formulating and implementing a city-
wide or regional water conservation/mitigation program.
Such a program would require new development to reduce
water supply impacts through an off-site mitigation
program which would reduce water consumption in existing
development or develop new or alternative water sources
such as expanded reclamation or desalination facilities.
The otay Water District will provide domestic water
service, and potentially reclaimed water service. As
the water purveyor, the District may adopt its own
guidelines or standards for water conservation. The
District now has a water connection allocation program
in effect. The District will also monitor adherence to
policies or requirements of regional water agencies such
as the County Water Authority and the Regional Water
Quality Control Board.
As owners of property with significant irrigation needs,
the City and Sweetwater Union High School District will
have the opportunity to utilize reclaimed water when it
becomes available. In the interim, they have a responsi-
bility to use water conserving plant materials and
irrigation systems.
10
3/-.333
.'
xxx. ~TER SERVICE AND SUPPLY
This section describes the sources of domestic water for the Rancho
del Rey SPA II and SPA III projects, identifies the responsible
water agencies, and details current issues regarding the supply of
water to the project.
A. Water Sources/Agencies
Metropolitan Water District
The primary source of domestic water in Southern California
is the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California
(MWD) which serves 27 member agencies from Los Angeles to San
Diego. These agencies include incorporated cities and water
districts along the coast, encompassing over half the
population of California. The purpose of MWD is to provide
an adequate amount of water to each of its member agencies.
To do this, MWD utilizes the California aqueduct system to
convey water from the north and east to southern California.
San Diego County receives up to 95% of its water through this
system. Lake Skinner, the major water storage facility
serving San Diego County, has a SO/50 blend of Colorado River
water and State Water Project (Northern California) water.
Both these water sources are limited. Deliveries of Colorado
River water to the MWD are expected to decline as others
entitled to the water in the river increase their diversions.
Recent drought conditions have drawn attention to the
limitations of State Water Project flows. Given this
situation, increasing attention has been directed state-wide
toward conservation measures to more efficiently utilize this
limited resource.
On December 11, 1990, the MWD mandated water rationing for
member agencies. Delivery quotas for each district will be
established based on reductions which range from 5% for
residential consumption to 20% for agricultural uses for an
overall reduction of 7.8%, beginning February 1, 1991. Any
water delivered to the local water agencies in San Diego in
excess of their quota will cost $394 per ac/ft, 300% more than
water within the quota. For water savings in excess of the
quota, local districts will receive incentive rebates of $99
per ac/ft (1 ac/ft equals 326,000 gallons). It will be up to
each local agency to determine how to achieve water consump-
tion reductions within their district.
The required cutbacks are the second phase of a five-phase
plan to reduce water consumption by 10% in 1991. Phase I was
officially implemented on December 1, 1990 and was designed
to achieve voluntary reductions of 10% for residential and
industrial use and unspecified reductions in agricultural and
groundwater replenishment uses. If the current drought
(03/25/91)
11
31'" 33'1
continues and Phase II is ineffective, Phase III would be put
into effect. Reductions of 10% for residential and 30% for
agriculture would be required. If conditions continued to
deteriorate, mandatory reductions would increase to 15% and '.
40\, respectively, in Phase IV and 20\ and 50\ in Phase V.
San Diego county Water Authority
The San Diego County Water Authority (SDCWA) is the largest
member agency of MWD. In 1988-89, MWD delivered 28.1\ of its
water to SDCWA and MWD water constituted 90.1\ of all water
delivered by SDCWA. Twenty-four member agencies including
cities, water districts, irrigation districts, municipal water
districts, public utility districts, a federal agency, and a
county water district are served by the Authority. The
individual member agencies, in turn, directly or indirectly
supply over 95\ of the San Diego County population. About
half of the member agencies depend completely on supply from
SDCWA, while the other half has some local supply available
through treated surface and ground water. SDCWA purchases and
distributes treated water from various treatment plants owned
and operated by its member agencies.
SDCWA imports water from the Colorado River and the State
Water Project through MWD, their sole supplier of imported
water. Distribution of the water takes place through an
aqueduct system maintained and operated by the Authority.
Each member agency submits a daily request for water and is
responsible for having adequate storage facilities when extra
is ordered, and adequate reserves for those times when not
enough is ordered.
In response to the recent drought conditions, the SDCWA
requested that member agencies enact mandatory water conserva-
tion measures. In response all agencies except the largest,
the city of San Diego, did so. The city of San Diego enacted
a voluntary conservation campaign. Conservation efforts in
San Diego county have been successful in meeting initial
targets, including MWD requirements. No specific plans have
been adopted in response to the most recent MWD mandates, as
current conservation efforts exceed these targets.
otay Water District
The Otay Water District (OWD) is the local water agency which
delivers water to consumers in the Rancho del Rey project
area. The OWD has no local surface runoff water available
and relies completely on the SDCWA for water supply. There
appears to be little opportunity to develop alternative
sources (i.e., wells, runoff collection, etc.). OWD owns and
operates a local distribution system, but currently lacks
sufficient seasonal/emergency reservoir capacity.
(03/25/91)
12
3/-3'35
Because of this lack of storage capacity, the own has met peak
demands by increased deliveries from the SDCWA aqueduct during
peak demand periods. This approach has created potential
problems for the SDCWA and other member agencies.
Due to the lack of adequate water availability to meet
regional short-term peak demands in general, the water supply
to OWD has been limited by the SDCWA to 38 cubic feet per
second (cfs) during high peak demand. The two aqueducts
operated by the SDCWA to import water into the San Diego
region reach capacity during peak demand periods; the
infrastructure of the importation system itself is occasional-
ly not adequate to meet peak water demands. To address this
issue, the SDCWA is planning to construct an additional
aqueduct, tentatively to be completed by 1994.
The OWD receives excess water during non-peak periods to meet
the additional demand during peak periods; however, the
District does not have sufficient water storage facilities to
assure year round availability. The District is currently
negotiating with the Sweetwater Authority and the City of San
Diego to increase its storage ability to ensure adequate water
service during peak periods.
The Otay Water District has been experiencing these water
storage problem for some time. As a result, the district
developed and is implementing a water allocation program.
The otav Water District Report on Allocation of Water Reauests
Based on Water Availabilitv was adopted by the Board of
Directors on April 19, 1989 as Resolution No. 2742. Because
of the inability to store adequate water for an unlimited
amount of new development, the allocation system allots 1,900
Equivalent Dwelling Units (EDUs) of water service per year for
the service area. In the Chula Vista, this limit equates to
approximately 700 to 1,000 units per year. This program will
remain in effect until supply and terminal storage conditions
improve, additional sources of water supply are found, or the
SDCWA lifts the limitation of 38 cfs. At that time, the
yearly allotment of connections will be increased or the
allocation program will be eliminated. Necessary improvements
are not anticipated to be completed before 1994-5.
The OWD Water Allocation Program implements actions taken by
the District to allow issuance of water service connections
within the District until the construction of the new Pipeline
No. 4 is complete. The issuance of new water service is
subject to the District's present limited water storage and
water supply. These actions include the approval of guide-
lines which: 1) categorize various water requests; and, 2)
determine if a water service request qualifies for immediate
connection or, future connection based on an allocation of
(03/25/91)
13
3' - 33(,
water service to the anticipated Equivalent Dwelling Units
(EDUs) requests. The following categories are used in
determining the allocation of water service in the District: '
Cateaorv I - Water service requests that qualify for
immediate water connection with issuance of an approved
building permit.
Cateaorv II - Water service requests that qualify for
water service connection contingent upon completion of
conditions of an agreement with the District entered into
prior to adoption of the allocation program.
Cateaorv III - Land Development water service requests
that are allocated water service dependent on contribu-
tion to construction of major water facilities including,
but not limited to, terminal water reservoirs, major
water transmission mains, pump stations, etc., that
directly or indirectly support water service.
After the adoption of the allocation program, the Otay-Triad
Agreement was entered into. This agreement is between the
Otay Water District, EastLake Development Company, Rancho Del
Rey Partnership (developer of the SPA II and SPA III pro-
jects), and Rancho Del Sur Partnership. In essence, the Otay-
Triad Agreement allows EastLake, Rancho Del Rey, and Rancho
Del Sur to request more EDUs per quarter per development for
single family connections than would otherwise be possible.
Without the Otay-Triad Agreement, these developers would not
be able to request more than 200 EDUs per quarter per
development for single family connections. In exchange, the
developers have approved bond financing of terminal storage
faculties in lieu of paying a Reservoir Storage Fee to OWD.
This enables OWD to construct the necessary terminal storage
reservoirs at an earlier date than would have been possible
by collecting fees only.
The OWD also operates a small water reclamation plant (1.3
MGD) which is currently not operated to it's full potential
due to strict water quality regulations, high energy costs and
limited demand. A pipeline between the plant and the EastLake
project (located approximately 3 miles east of Rancho del Rey)
has been construct~d and is expected to supply irrigation
water to the golf course and other landscaped areas now being
developed. It is anticipated that the OWD will supply greater
volumes of reclaimed water in the future, either through
expansion of the existing plant or additional facilities.
(03/25/91)
14
3/-33?--
B. Rancho del Rey Project Facilities
Rancho del Rey SPA II and SPA III are the second and third '
phases of the Rancho del Rey Planned Community. The previous
phase, SPA I is now under construction north of East "H"
street and southwest of otay Lakes Road. SPA II comprises the
northwestern portion of the project site, north of East "H"
Street. SPA III is located south of East "H" Street and north
of Telegraph Canyon Road.
Existing water facilities owned and operated by the otay Water
District will connect to the proposed facilities depicted in
Exhibit A, Domestic Water Plan SPA II, which will complete the
looped water system north of East "H" Street. Facilities to
serve the SPA III project are depicted in Exhibit B. Also,
in anticipation of the increased availability of reclaimed
water in the future, reclaimed water mains and service lines
will be constructed as a part of the projects. The system
within SPA III is depicted in Exhibit C. The proposed main
in Paseo Ranchero will convey reclaimed water, when it is
available, to SPAs I and II where landscape irrigation systems
built to use reclaimed water are being installed in Rancho del
Rey Parkway to serve SPA II and the middle ridge of SPA I.
A connecting main in East "J" Street will supply irrigation
water for the park and school sites in SPA III.
(03/25/91)
15
31-.338
w
-
,
\t.l
UJ
...0
.--~;s\
.--- .."~",,,
-_.-- ~
.-..--.-..-.- -----\ /-------- \/
-.-..-. J '- /
-..- \ -
rr'~" -- "'----..J ( -.........-- -- /.<~..
~ --'''' \ i.
.---_.~ / .\ . (; ,.'
-'- . 1 ,_J ". "l624k . .': J, \
r' \. k~,.,if"". ......!""}!io~~~1 ,......'..\.\..
o j';; ___"","-. ""--__.J \
I ""~~ .." '-""" I-
. \. /~~~ ( ~ "., '. .Jl,
\ '- .'~'Y ( ),' .
~ ;,~/ . _____\--1 qOj\o8C.~..tO- .
....,7 /, . prilPosWSPA 1 '
~~(u------/ 'j ! '<pne..~tt~. weler/,
1-- .---;;..-'-'(---- \ J' /:ey.I'I'lt.::> if
I . , ~-\' / \ Ii i/ .!
I /'\': 16:>41 i-- \ / \ ~, . J I.., .. ('
Y~ ~~ \ \ . "'-.' /.
.\~ ))= ,_' ..J /,/// J /ri.. . (t,.,.,.::l
'/~f-- - -- I~' \
. //1/1'/ / '" / ..
conne~lon to ;1111 . ../ - /_~
exl.Unll1r II ..._..-...-u_.. ./..
wele, 1.ln II, ..-'- ---,_u_..-.,-.
olf.lIs. i . _/ N 1 .,./
\ ./:JiL/./
o ./ ~
\ ../., Comeclton 16 prOl1088d SPA 1 ..
r~ domestlc water syst~
i
\
i
.,."\
-~QQ~ReyB!r
Domestic
Water Ran
. SPA II
KEY: 12" (624)
1 't.. WeIer Pres.... Zone
""" llIometer
E:=3
m
PI oposed Water
Mahs
Pressure
Reducing Valve
SoIn:e: RIck Ellgi_'Ill Co.1988
~'
Cinti'
1000
& A<ro:des
"" tie 16191139 -1815 Ex,..;t .
"
c~.-
...........
..........
Domestic Water Plan
SPA III
............
'........... .........."
"...........,
'...........
'.
11" (824)
\ -
l
"
_.- I Cor'IMcllGn to
... - , ..latina 12. (110) IMfn
I .0' 111011 '\ .........\
..-----.:-. _'';:~I_.,.
e _-'"._ .
~,,' . \
~, ,:
"---. /'I -. ,~ ,---
.------, ,.,/ \ ~1'0".1- I .
Y ,; '1,0) ., . ~.... . .
. , ; .' J
2' ~ ....\ S;-:'^---
#0- " _~....
tIII\.... .
"~'-
KEY:
~2' (110)
't...-- Pressure Zone
- PIpe Diameter
,
~ e Exlsltlg 22-2 Reservoir
I Existing WeIer Main
a Proposed Water Main
COnMCtton to
IJl:lsUng 12. {JJ2rrlMln
ConnKtlon 10 ..
SlllsUng H'. [e2.(J NI"
,-,'\0'
__... .......,...... c__. ,_
.. Note: Pr...ur. Zone. Indtuted by [l2.q .r. cur"nUy
710 zone m.me which will be reduced to 8'. lone m11ln,
In the lulur. by O.w.O.
.-.,
-'
.-"
"
.
.
.
.
20. 624jO
_., h__ ........ ."1_.....1
..-.....--
.~QQllLRey~
mmo~ ~
Ci1II
.-
"lIInt.,."
Exhibit B
c=
~':""""
o:(f
en
'-
.m
~
"0
Q)
E
0(6
13
(E
_...-.
,,~"'1''f;~''':~~t.~~;:..
.~'C....", V.;U4,..,....... ~/..,. \..............
,.",. ...~......,>".......~",:""~.....:~ ....~~ ''''''~'''':'. \.
,,.d(..~~tMI? ~"I.,...~V....":l:.\...........~')..~,-:~..;Vr~'''' \.,
"....';;.~~i?...~"i..~.,(ly$.,..~(~'\~<:~').....::..!~.~~r!.:t~: A"
''f:\ti\C..Jf>,.,~7.'~'-,>;<-V'.v,tCl'.' ~..' .~,"\
~.~..\~~1\~"~1 "'~\;\\V ' Bi~\ 'p;.~) '\"
~~~0:'t\T( iv" ..- .~,;;/ (~ c
,~ '_...-<.. J'~ ~~. .2E
\.....r~:..;\-:\f: . \ :--- \ ",,' (04)
c...".\.'-\c;,~.\" )> -...;::~ '\ \,,\ .,;;;
\...... '-OJ\." . ~ ,- I -- '- ~ \" c >-
c:;..........-f"\r,.~.~....' "-' __ \ '\ '\. c. (f)
"';-"'J'~J\<Y'r;'~ ' -..::::::-X- \,' 0,,"
"'"' .....,,. -( r,"1r'" ,-/. ....A' '\ -
\'lji.t.LJ,,;.;.t; \ \ / ,\,... \ ~2
~\l~T...~ \\ I _/ '\ \.2'0
\ \\\\~\-~1T~no \\ ",. \) \t B
\\ . ,1\~~t ,'t' ,\ 0:> \
.. H1 - t...."... , ~
\ \ \1~~i\.~:\~~r:~" \ ,'t \
\ \ .."..,....,." ..~-\ \ \
I~ \\ \ '\
c: \. . 1\ ...~";;:.'.'
.2E,\ ) \ '\.... """,,,'s,..::-;..-;..J,\ \
o~ " .." 1~.J..~:..j:-_l'.( \
G> '" (). lllH' .....:... ,
c: >- , l\l!.~"~' .', ,
'" I"'" . ," \
5 G> \\ '-!;:j:~:~;',/ j \
u:!: " { ( j.,..""c:..~....,. \
e~ i.!I(:;.....";~:-.<,.
.2 0...... \. <\1j~"",~:~:;:" \.... 1.1
oro "\'" \ r' C\;:~-.).,t~ ::~-.C.l-,~:'. \il
- ""\\;" I" <j,. '<!7 ,0:::";:",:'::, ·
\i'\<"'j( ~~ XW~f~-' ;\
\'. (...... I . r-'r~' j.:~{~t'" '-" i I
it\..t)'-J , " : ~;;;:U.! I \ '" I I
\/'~ 'l'~ ~-~~ I
__J': I '",,- ~'" I
-I! I) ~'ll
: i J:
.. I: (J I
JL-' I :
II-I' / I
d I /
/' J ,
I / '
I/J I
, : :
--.-' l I/.f
1(', r::F
/1 I: .
IJ JI I'
(./ I,
I' ,
/1 i
/ l ,
1/ .
/.. I
:~/ :
7: I
't .
/!.J'
I ~.
II
3/- ~L/I
.,
.S;
Q;
c.
ii:
'C
.,
en
o
C.
o
~
Q.
rn
~II u
-
~
)(
w
5
EJ
~
!!
SJ
~~
Bj
8~
II
:IV. WATER CONSUMPTION
This section presents information on historical and projected water
use in the region. The anticipated water demand of the SPA II and
SPA III projects is also quantified.
A. Historical Water Use
The availability of imported water in California led to its
increased use for landscaping and agricultural. The cultiva-
tion of lush ornamental plants and lawns which are typical of
landscape in mid western and eastern states where water is
plentiful replaced the "drought tolerant" native California
vegetation. Agriculture was introduced in formerly arid and
semi-arid areas. As the population of California grew, so
also did urban water demand
In San Diego however, per capita water consumption has not
substantially increased. From 1970 to 1988, per capita
consumption ranged from 169 to 241 gallons per capita per day,
averaging approximately 200 gallons per capita per day, which
is also the current factor. This total is divided among land
uses in the following percentages: 45% residential, 32%
commercial/industrial, and 23% agricultural.
By the year 2000, the San Diego area population is expected
to grow by approximately 16%, with concurrent increases in
water demand. SDCWA is actively working to reduce water
consumption by 15%, primarily through controls on agricultural
uses. This goal should be easily achievable given the results
that were observed during the 1975-1977 drought when reduc-
tions of 25-90% were obtained through more efficient irriga-
tion and changes in maintenance practices. Because of the
on-going drought conditions, water conservation is being
promoted or required throughout the state, including San
Diego, as described in previous sections of this report.
B. Water Use in Rancho del Rey SPA II and SPA III
Table 4-2 shows the projected water use in Rancho del Rey SPA
II and SPA III, based on average use rates which do not
reflect significant conservation measures, categorized
according to land use and residential density based on the
population estimates given in Table 4-1. The primary unit of
measure for water quantity used for comparison in this report
is gallons per capita per day (gpcpd). This can be multiplied
by the estimated number of persons per dwelling unit (DU) to
obtain the gallons per day per dwelling unit. The number of
persons per dwelling unit varies with the type of residential
unit (apartment, condominium, single family detached, etc.),
as shown in Table 4-1.
(03/25/91)
19
3'-3Y~
.'
The total projected average water use, without conservation
measures, for the Rancho del Rey SPA II and SPA III projects
is 0.74 million gallons per day (MGD). The ability to use
reclaimed water to irrigate large areas in SPA II and SPA III
is being built into the project, and is addressed separately,
as it is not directly a part of the residential development.
Approximately 0.07 MGD (10%) of the total water need could be
satisfied by using reclaimed water. The focus of this report
is to describe conservation measures for reducing the
projected 0.67 MGD potable water use within the residential
development.
One additional benefit to decreased indoor water use is the
reduction in sewage volume generated. Although sewage is not
part of this plan, the reductions in volume due to water
conservation measures could have a significant cost savings
impact on related collection and treatment facilities.
Table 4-1
Rancho del Rey SPA II and SPA III Estimated Population
Proposed
Units
(DU)
Household
Size
Population
SPA II
Single Family Detached 567 3.0 1,701
SPA III
Single Family Detached 564 3.0 1,692
Attached Med. Density 522 2.5 1,305
Attached High Density ~ 1.:..Q 588
SPA III Subtotal 1,380 2.6 (avg. ) 3,585
TOTALS 1,947 2.7 (avg. ) 5,286
(03/25/91)
20
3'. ~L/3
Table 4-2
projected Water Use in Rancho del Rey SPA II and SPA III
Land Use Population Rate Use
(MGDI
Residential
SPA II - SFD 1,701 persons 130 gpcpd .22
SPA III - SFD 1,692 persons 130 gpcpd .22
Attached Low Density 1,305 persons 110 gpcpd .14
Attached High Density 588 persons 95 gpcpd .06
Sub-total 5,286 persons .64
Jr. High school: Potable 1,400 students 20 gpcpd .03
Irrigation 8.5 acres 3.0 ft/yr .02*
Public Park
SPA II 6.5 acres 3.0 ft/yr .02*
SPA III 10.0 acres 3.0 ft/yr .03*
Total Permanent Potable Use 0.67
Total Potential Reclaimed Use .07*
Total Water Use 0.74
Average per capita use 140 gal/day*~
gpapd= gallons per acre per day
gpcpd= gallons per capita per day
MGD= million gallons per day
*Areas with potential to be irrigated with reclaimed water.
**Per capita amount is well below regional average because project
does not include commercial, industrial or agricultural uses which
are included in regional per capita statistic.
(03/25/91)
21
.5/-3'1-'1
v. Water Conservation Measures
Three consecutive years of drought in watersheds supplying San
Diego County have lead to changing attitudes and governmental
policies regarding water. continued water shortfalls are projected
as growth continues in Southern California. Three possible
solutions are available: increase water supply from non-tradition-
al sources; conserve available water; or, increase production and
use of reclaimed water. The conservation approach is the focus of
this report, primarily because it is a cost effective approach
which can be directly implemented on a project-by-project basis.
Over the long-term, water conservation must become an integral
component of the Southern California way of life with or without
a drought condition in order to avoid drastic lifestyle altera-
tions. The potential impact of water conservation can be see in
Table 5-1.
A. Available On-site Conservation Measures
Several general approaches to water conservation are avail-
able: demand reduction; increased efficiency; increased
supply/reclaimed water use; and, improved water system
management. The measures included in this report are limited
to those which can be implemented in projects of the size and
type of Rancho del Rey SPA II and SPA III.
1. Public Information
Any voluntary or mandatory water conservation effort
requires cooperation of the public. Most consumers have
very little knowledge of the water system that serves
them. Historically, water has been inexpensive in
california; therefore, people have a tendency to assume
that there is an abundant supply and take it for granted.
The purpose of public education is to inform and convince
the consumer that a change in personal water habits is
essential and is in hiS/her own and the community's best
interest. Generally, long term results are best achieved
through educating children in water conservation.
2. Land Use
The per capita and per dwelling unit water use quantity
changes with the type of residential units, the value of
the residence, and the size of the lot. Table 5-1 shows
typical per capita use for a single family detached
residence in coastal Southern California. Interior per
capita use is similar to other types of residences; the
major difference in use is with outside use, which is
significantly lower for high density developments such
(03/25/91)
22
3/- 3l/5
Table 5-1
Residential Water Use in Southern California
Use wi
Conservation Potential
Typical Use Measures Water Savings
(gpcpd) (gpcpd) (gpcpd) %
Inside Use
Toilet 30.0 20.0 10.0 33
Bath/Shower 22.0 17.0 5.0 23
Laundry 10.0 8.5 1.5 15
Dishwashing 4.0 3.0 1.0 25
Faucet 3.0 2.5 0.5 17
Cooking 3.0 3.0 0.0 0
Total Inside 72.0 54.0 18.0 25%
outside Use
Landscape 53.0 28.0 25.0 47
Car Washing,
etc. 5.0 5.0 0 0
Total Outside 58.0 33.0 25.0 47%
TOTAL USE 130.0 87.0 43.0 33%
Total Savings:
Single Family Detached - 129 Gallons Per DU Per Day at 3.0
Capita Per DU
Attached Low Density - 108 Gallons Per DU Per Day at 2.5
Capita Per DU
Attached High Density - 86 Gallons Per DU Per Day at 2.0
Capita Per DU
NOTE: Total savings without consideration of reclamation
Source: Luke-Dudek Engineers
(03/25/91)
23
3/*'3t1e.
as apartments and condominiums. Table 5-1 also shows the
potential savings for each of the water use areas.
3. Mechanical Measures
Numerous mechanical devices to reduce household water
consumption are available, especially for interior use.
As Table 5-1 indicates, about half the water used in
California is used indoors.
The bathroom is where most inside water is used and
wasted daily. Conventional toilets use from 5 to 7
gallons per flush, as opposed to low-flush toilets, which
use from 3.3 to 1.5 gallons per flush. Since 1978,
California has required that all new toilets installed
use no more than 3.5 gallons per flush. Early on there
was some concern that low flow toilets would cause
clogging problems in sewer laterals, however, this has
not been the case.
Ultra low flush toilets, which have recently been
developed, use about 1.5 gallons per flush. This is a
reduction of about 57% from the low flush toilets used
in new homes, and a reduction of up to 70% from the older
toilets. since the toilet accounts for about 40% of the
indoor use, this presents a significant opportunity for
reduction.
Standard shower heads have a flow rate of about 4.5
gallons per minute (gpm). California requires that new
shower heads have a flow of no more than 2.75 gpm. The
most water conservative showerheads have a flow rate of
0.5 gpm using a blend of air and water to give the
illusion of a higher flow rate. In addition to saving
water, low flow showerheads save energy too by reducing
the amount of hot water used. Hot water use is the
second largest residential energy consumer; heating and
air conditioning the home is the greatest residential
use. Low flow faucets reduce flow rates from about 5 gpm
to between 2.75 gpm and 0.5 gpm; this can save one gallon
per person per day.
Low water-use appliances can also be large contributors
to water conservation. Certain models of dishwashers use
50% less water than others and can thus save between 7
and 9 gallons per load. Clothes washers use 41 to 74
gallons per load. Front loading washers are more
efficient than top loading, and various options can save
even more water. Water level controls and washers that
recycle rinse water save about 1. 5 gallons per person per
day. Table 5-2 shows potential water use reduction due
to water saving devices installed in an average home.
(03/25/91)
24
3/- 3 Yr
Table 5-2
summary of Typical Household water-saving Devices
Water Use Reduction
Device qpd percent
Toilet improvements 7.5-17.5 12-27
Faucet aerators 0- 0.5 0- 1
Shower flow limiting 0- 7.5 0-12
Pressure-reducing valves 0-16.0 0-20
Improved clothes washers 0- 8.0 O- S
Improved dishwashers 0- 8.0 0- 4
Hot water pipe insulation 0- 8.0 1- 4
Approximate Total 35.0 gpd 25%
From: Water Conservation strategies, AWWA, 1980.
4. Landscape
Approximately 50% of water used in California is for
landscapes. Typical landscape efficiencies are between
50% and 80%; therefor, savings of 20% - 50% are possible
through better watering techniques and maintenance.
Trickle/drip irrigation applies water exactly where it
is needed at an efficiency of 85% - 90%, and results in
a total water savings of more than 4% alone. Generally,
sprinklers are between 60 and 75% efficient. Watering
at night, or in the early morning, using automatic
sprinkler systems can save 20% of outside water. Daytime
irrigation is inefficient because much water is lost to
evaporation. Through the use of drought tolerant plants,
water consumption can be reduced by 40% to 60%.
Moisture sensors are another way to increase irrigation
efficiencies. Residential customers, on the average,
over water their landscaping by about 20% while parks and
recreational areas are over watered by nearly 80%.
Moisture sensors are not considered economical for
residential use, but would save millions of gallons of
water and thousands of dollars each year if used for
parks and recreational areas. Polymers and wetting
agents in the soil can also increase irrigation efficien-
cy.
(03/25/91)
25
31 - 3 t,L'i
B. Conservation Measures xmplemented in Rancho del Rey SPA XX and
SPA XXX
Implementing water conservation measures before a project is
constructed provides an opportunity to include measures which
might not otherwise be practical. Many of the measures
described here could be prohibitively expensive to retro-fit
to existing residences, but can be cost effective if included
with the initial construction. In addition, moving in to a
new home provides a major opportunity to change habits and
attitudes while adjusting to the new home/environment.
The potential water savings for each of the conservation
measures to be implemented in Rancho del Rey SPA II and SPA
III are shown in Table 5-3 in units of gallons per capita per
day (gpcpd), and can be multiplied by the number of people per
dwelling unit (DU) to determine the water savings for each
household. Water savings are relative to other newer homes
without water conservation devices; much higher water savings
can be shown if the proposed measures are compared to older
residential units.
1. Fixtures/Devices - Indoors
Ultra-Low Flow Toilet - The ultra low flow toilet uses
1.6 gallons per flush, compared to the current require-
ment of 3.5 gal/flush, or the older standard of 5 to 7
gal/flush. Tests have shown that the new 3 1/2 gallon
toilets actually use 4 to 4 1/2 gallons. Since the
toilet is the largest single inside use of water (40%),
large savings can be realized by using the ultra-low flow
toilets. Although the ultra-low flow toilets can cost
$50 more than a standard model, the savings more than
make up for the additional cost.
Ultra-Low Flow Shower Head - The ultra-low flow shower
head reduces the flow from the current standard of 3.5
to 2 gpm. Older shower heads flow from 3 to 5 gpm. The
ultra-low flow shower head saves about 5 gpcpd for a
minimal extra cost of approximately $3.00.
Faucet Aerator - Faucet aerators give the appearance and
feel of greater flow, so less water is used. Many new
homes already come with aerators, so the actual savings
is shown ranging from 0 to 0.5 gpcpd. Although the
savings is small, the additional cost is low, so their
use is economical. There is also potential savings in
energy through reduced use of hot water.
Hot Water Pipe Insulation - By insulating the hot water
pipes and separating the hot and cold lines to reduce
heat exchange, the time the faucet is allowed to flow
(03/25/91)
26
31- ~'/,
while waiting for the water to become hot is reduced.
The cost for insulating the pipes exceeds the value of
water saved, but the cost is relatively low, and it is
simple to do while the unit is under construction. The
potential energy savings with insulation can be signifi-
cant.
Pressure Reducina Valve - A pressure reducing valve at
the water hook-up for each residence can reduce the flow
rate by reducing the pressure in the lines. Normal
pressures for residential use range from 40 to 80 psi;
the optimum is a range of 50 to 60 psi allowing a normal
flow of 3 gpm. The amount of potential savings depends
on the line pressure available, and ranges from 0 to 3
gpcpd.
Water Efficient Dishwasher New water efficient
dishwashers can save as much as 6 gallons per cycle over
older models. Newer models tend to be more efficient,
so the actual amount of water saved will depend on the
type of dishwasher proposed. Since there is a relation-
ship between cost and water efficiency, more expensive
homes would probably already be planned for the most
efficient dishwashers.
Water Efficient Clothes Washers The relationship
between water efficiency and cost of the appliance for
the clothes washer is the same as with the dishwasher.
Since the clothes washer uses more water, the potential
savings is greater. The major difference with the
clothes washer is that it is normally supplied by the
owner, and would therefore be difficult to mandate the
use of more efficient and costly machines, especially
since the cost increase exceeds the value of the water
saved. Rancho del Rey will advise and assist homeowners
in their selection of an efficient machine.
2. Outdoors/Landscapinq
Efficient Irriaation Svstem - As much as 50% of total
water use is outside the home for a single family
detached residence with large turf areas. Most residen-
tial landscaping is over-watered, so the potential
savings with efficient, timed sprinklers and micro
irrigation systems is very large. Builder installed
xeriscaped front yards with efficient irrigation systems
are now provided in Rancho del Rey SPA I. All builder
installed irrigation in SPA II and SPA III will be water
efficient. Drip irrigation systems will be utilized
where appropriate. The installation of correspondingly
efficient systems by homeowners in rear yards will
require eduction programs and a project Water Conserva-
(03/25/91)
27
3/- 350
tion Coordinator to provide advice and assistance. A
water coordinator is now serving Rancho del Rey SPA I,
and will also serve SPA II and SPA III projects. A".
Homeowner's Guide to Drought Tolerant Landscape will be
distributed to all new home buyers to provide information
on irrigation systems and low water use landscaping.
Low Water Use Landscaoina - The largest potential for
reducing outside water use is to decrease the water
demand by using low-water use, drought-tolerant landscap-
ing. Turf areas require large amounts of water, so
restricting the area of turf will have a significant
impact. Builder installed front yards will have reduced
turf areas and utilize drought-tolerant plant materials.
A Homeowner's Guide to Drought Tolerant Landscape will
be distributed to all new home buyers to educate and
encourage similar homeowner installed landscape design
and materials.
3. Education
General Water Conservation - In addition to the physical
measures to reduce water consumption, a general water
conservation program will enforced to reduce waste.
Guidelines and educational materials will be distributed
to all new homeowners. Water waste may be monitored by
the local homeowners' associations, where available, or
the Water Conservation Coordinator.
McMillin Communities has sponsored and will continue to
sponsor weekend seminars on water conservation and
xeriscape options for homeowner landscaping.
4. Reclaimed Water
Water Reclamation - Water reclamation conserves large
amounts of potable water used for irrigation. The major
opportunities for irrigation with reclaimed water are the
neighborhood parks and the field area of the junior high
school. Reclaimed water mains will be installed to
deliver water to these sites when it becomes available.
The decision to utilize reclaimed water will lie with the
respective property owners, the City of Chula vista and
Sweetwater Union High School District. The use of
reclaimed water on these three sites could result in a
10% reduction in potable water use in the SPA II and SPA
III projects (see Table 4-2).
In SPA I (units 5 & 6) and SPA II, a reclaimed water main
has been installed in the loop road and landscape
irrigation systems approved for reclaimed water use have
been installed in the public open space areas. These
(03/25/91)
28
3' - ,SI
will be charged with potable water until reclai~ed water
is available (expected within 5-10 years). At that time,
a single disconnection/connection is all that will be
required to utilize reclaimed water for open space
irrigation. Similar installations will be made in SPA
III by the Master Developer, where appropriate. The City
and school district should consider such an approach for
the irrigated areas for which they are responsible.
5. Water Use Durinq Construction
Water conservation measures can also be implemented
during the construction/grading process. The three
primary uses are: dust abatement; soil compaction; and,
street washing. Grading and construction which is now
going on in SPAs I and II serves as an example of the
techniques which can be implemented in SPA III. Since
the imposition of Stage 2 water conservation requirements
by the Otay Water District, water conservation has been
incorporated in Rancho del Rey construction activities,
as appropriate. Water use has been limited to that
necessary for proper soil compaction; soiled streets have
been swept instead of washed. Reclaimed water could be
used for these grading activities, however it is not
currently available.
The use of native/naturalized plant materials on graded
slopes in open space will reduce the need for irrigation
in the future. The "Rancho del Rey Revegetation Method"
(modified Tyson method) is being utilized to re-vegetate
some graded areas. The method involves scraping and
saving native topsoil and then reinstalling it on top of
non-irrigated graded areas. With rainfall, the seeds of
the native plants in the top soil sprout and re-vegetate
the graded area with the same species that were original-
ly present, eventually re-establishing the same natural
habitat.
The use of dry grains to stabilize/landscape temporary
slopes is also being evaluated. This approach avoids
the use of water to irrigate temporary landscaping which
has traditionally been used in such areas.
c. Projected Water savings
As indicated in Table 5-3, a total water savings of 0.340 MGD
or approximately 46% is projected with full implementation of
the water conservation measures specified in this plan.
(03/25/91)
29
31 ... ~5 :l
Conservation
Heasure
Table 5-3
Rancho del Rey SPA II and SPA III
Water Conservation Measures
Function
Water Savings
Per For Project
Capita (HGD)
(gpcpd)
Per
Residence
(gpdjDU)
Inside
Ultra-low flow
Toilet I 1.6
9al/flush
Ultra-low flow
.hower head; 2 GPM
Faucet Aerator
Hot Water Pipe
Insulation
Water Hook-up
Pressure Reducing
Valve
Water Efficient
Dishwasher
Water Efficient
Clothes Washer
Outside
Efficient
Sprinklers & Drip
Irrigation
Low Water Use
Landscaping
General
COnservation
~a~er Reclamation
Reduced Flush
Volume
Reduced Shower
Flow Rate
Appearance and
Feel of Greater
Flow
Reduces Warm-Up
Time
Reduces Pressure
and Flow Rate
Reduced Water
Requirement
Reduced Water
Requirements
Increased
Irrigation
Efficiency
Low Water Demand
Reduce Waste
Replace Potable
Irrigation Water
10
0.053
27
14
1
5
8
3
4
27
41
8
PROJECT TOTALS
138
(03/25/91)
5
0.026
0-0.5
0.003
O-l
0.01l
0-1
0.016
0-1
0.005
0-1. 5
O.OOB
10
0.053
15
0.079
0-1
0.016
0.070
51
0.340
30
3/-3~.3
D. Off-site Mitigation Measures
Because of the crisis created by the mUlti-year drought in "
California and the extreme short-term water rationing/use
restrictions adopted to respond to the situation, new
attention is being given to formulating new policies which
will conserve water and allow for long-term growth.
As noted in the preceding sections, although the SPA II and
SPA III projects implement a variety of water conserving
practices, the construction and occupation of these projects
will result in an increased demand for water. The drought has
demonstrated that water is a finite resource and that current
supplies cannot reliably support current demands and continued
growth. However, growth is major component of both the
state's and, especially, the local San Diego area economy.
In order to accommodate growth, while long term water supply
options are evaluated and implemented, new programs to more
efficiently use the available water are being proposed.
An initial area of focus is the retro-fit of plumbing fixtures
and landscape irrigation in existing development. According
to statistics compiled by the Construction Industry Federation
(CIF) retro-fitting the shower and toilet fixtures in
approximately 2.8 older homes would save the amount of
interior-use water required by one new home (additional older
homes would be required to offset outdoor water use at the new
home) . Thus a mitigation program which collected fees to
complete such conversions, or directly required equivalent
conversions, could allow a limited amount of new development
to occur without creating a net increase in water demand.
Comparable water savings could also be achieved by retro-
fitting irrigation systems of schools, parks, golf courses,
etc., where significant conservation of irrigation water could
be achieved. This type of water consumption off-set program
has been conceptually approved by the San Diego County Water
Authority. Additional studies to determine the exact
specifications, scope and implementation process are now
underway. In order to avoid conflicting regulations and to
maximize fairness, such a program would need to be implemented
on a wide basis, preferably county-wide. The City and local
water district would provide input in the establishment of the
large scale program and would probably provide local implemen-
tation.
As indicated earlier, the approval of the Rancho del Rey SPA
III Plan was conditioned to require a Water Conservation Plan
which reduced any impacts to the local water supply to an
"insignificant" level, as determined by the City Council.
This is the first and, so far, the only project to be so
conditioned. At the time the condition was drafted, it was
interpreted to require a zero net increase or complete water
(03/25/91)
31
31-35'/
consumption off-set, because no program, adopted policy or
city-wide criteria existed to be used as a standard. However,
as additional projects request approvals and/or a broad based
mitigation/conservation program is developed, "insignificant"
is expected to be defined as full implementation of on-site
conservation measures and full participation in an off-site
mitigation program endorsed by the city. The SPA II and SPA
III projects will fully comply with the requirements of a
city-approved and/or sponsored water conservation/mitigation
program.
(03/25/91)
32
,31-,355
.. ,
VI. IMPLEMENTATION/MONITORING
Implementation of the Water Conservation Plan shall primarily be
the responsibility of the Master Developer. The Master Developer
will establish requirements and guidelines for merchant builders
and provide educational materials and guidance to new homeowners.
The Master Developer will also install drought tolerant landscap-
ing, approved by the City, in streets capes and open space areas.
The Master Developer will also require the inclusion of drought
tolerant plant materials and efficient irrigation systems in any
builder installed landscaping. Portions of an outline for
Landscape Water Conservation, to be implemented on a project-by-
project basis within the community, is provided in Appendix A.
This approach, prepared for SPA I (units 5 & 6) and SPA II, has
been approved by the City's Landscape Architect and will also be
implemented in SPA III.
A substantial responsibility will also rest with the City of Chula
Vista to ensure/enforce the provisions of this plan, specifically
the Planning, Building, and Park and Recreation Departments. The
Planning and Building Departments will review plan submittals to
ensure that water conservation measures are properly included. The
Parks and Recreation Department will approve planting and irriga-
tion plans for public parks and open space.
Mains and laterals for reclaimed water will be installed with the
maj or road and infrastructure improvements. The provision of
reclaimed water is the responsibility of the otay Water District,
which will also be responsible for enforcing water quality
regulations. The determination to use reclaimed water for
irrigation purposes rests with the City Parks and Recreation
Department for parks and open space areas, and the Sweetwater Union
High School District for the junior high school site.
In order to ensure that all provisions of this plan are met, the
Mitigation Monitoring Program for the SPA III project, utilized to
ensure the mitigation measures specified in the project EIR are
implemented, will also incorporate the provisions of this Water
Conservation Plan. This approach will allow for a formal deter-
mination by the City that each of the required measures are
implemented. Future discretionary or administrative actions with
regard to Rancho del Rey SPA II and SPA III (e.g., tentative map,
development agreement, building or grading permit, etc.) may be
utilized to address or ensure compliance with the prescribed water
conservation measures.
(03/25/91)
33
.31-.35"
VII. REFERENCES
ERC Environmental and Energy Services Co.; Draft Suoolemental EIR
EastLake III/Olvmoic Traininq Center. August 1989.
cinti & Associates; Draft SPA Plan Rancho del Rev SPA III.
August 1990.
Luke-Dudek civil Engineers; EastLake Planned Communitv Water
Conservation studv. September 1989.
Luke-Dudek civil Engineers; Water Conservation Recommendations
for EastLake Greens. November 1989.
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California; Final Draft
Reqional Urban Water Manaqement Plan. July 1990.
P&D Technologies; Final Suoolemental EIR Rancho del Rev SPA III
ElAn. November 1990.
"Water Rationing Plan Includes S.D. County"; Los Anqeles Times.
San Dieqo Count v Edition, page A-I, December 12, 1990.
willdan Associates and Bud Gray; Draft Growth Manaqement Proqram
- citv of Chula Vista. August 1990.
(03/25/91)
34
.3 I -.35 1-
. "0
APPENDIX A
A-l
.31-':>5 i
q ,
RANCHO DEL REY SPA II and SPA III
Landscape Water Conservation outline
REVIEW PROCESS AND PROCEDURE
A. The creation of the Rancho del Rey irrigation and
landscape will consist of the meshing of numerous
projects into a pre-established pattern. To monitor
this effort, routine review during the planning and
implementation states of a project is a necessity.
This review will occur as a normal part of the total
landscape planning effort.
In addition to this master developer review process and
procedure, the City of Chula vista requires review.
The following is recommended:
1. Prior to commencement of desian of a specific
pro;ect within Rancho del Rev a meeting should be
conducted with the Rancho del Rey partnership
(RDRP) to thoroughly understand:
a. The project's relationship to overall
landscaped water management program.
b. Specific processing procedures and submittal
requirements.
2. Durina the Schematic Desian Phase, closely adhere
to the principles of the program, General
Landscape Plan, the Design Manual, the City of
Chula vista Landscape Manual, and the Otay Water
District Water Conservation program. Indicate
which areas will be irrigated by future reclaimed
water.
3. The Schematic Desian must be approved by the
Rancho del Rey Design Review Committee.
4. Durina the Desian Development Phase, the project
manager should incorporate applicable Landscape
and Irrigation standards.
5. The final workina drawinas must be approved by the
RDRP and the City of Chula Vista.
A-2
~/-359
. ..
Two separate sets of landscape, planting and irrigation
plans may be required:
a. Slope erosion control plans required as part
of the Grading Permit process;
b. Project Landscape and Irrigation Plans.
B. The formats for landscape submittals are as follows
(may be subject to change; verify latest requirements):
1. Schematic Submittal
This plan should be at the same scale as the site
plan and should clearly illustrate the landscape
architectural design including type of landscape
and plant materials. The plan shall include a
legend indicating all plant materials and sizes
and irrigation materials. A water conservation
program should also be included.
2. Final Submittals
a. Slope erosion control plans.
Plan shall be on City of Chula Vista "0"
sheets and conform to all applicable City
requirements.
b. Final Project Irrigation and Landscape Plans.
NOTE:
As previously mentioned, this is one component of
the total landscape planning effort, therefore,
separate drawings for the purpose of indicating
the Water Management Program do not have to be
prepared. Schematic and final submittal plans
will be the customary irrigation and landscape
plans, unless these plans do not cover specified
requirements.
IRRIGATION
The irrigation for Rancho del Rey shall be controlled by an
automatic irrigation system. The project landscape archi-
tect, water manager and his staff shall be familiar with
optimum use of the system, so that monitoring and response
to climate conditions can be achieved in the most expedient
and efficient manner.
A-)
~/-3'-O
. ..
The following steps shall also be taken to insure efficient
water use and conservation:
A. Analysis
1. Review and confirm projected water quality and
effects on proposed plant list. Develop plant
palette. Emphasize drought tolerant plant
materials and xeriscape.
2. Develop "ET zones" for project based upon
marketing, low water goals and plant material
3. Meet with City to confirm design standard requests
in general.
4. Meet with RDRP to review desired product.
5. Review design standards for otay reclaimed water
irrigation approval. Also, adhere to the District
Water Conservation program.
6. Establish construction phasing and timing with
respect to available water.
7. Review RWQCB and Health Standards.
8. Establish water use plan (master plan), meters,
peaking, average use, etc. Review potential of
supplementing reservoir during peaking.
9. Establish time of use for irrigation. Note any
restrictions mandated by the Water District.
10. Formulate maximum flows, maximum reach and
limitations of current and proposed reclaimed
system.
11. Review Rancho del Rey needs, check with otay on
additional user needs promised.
12. Check future expansion needs.
13. Establish priority list of which areas receive
water first, etc., down to the cost priority.
14. Review and confirm most efficient mainline
distribution system to service irrigation needs
and goals.
A-4
31 - 31,1
. .. ,
B. Irrigation Installation
In order to appropriately conserve water, the following
general procedure will be followed:
1.
Permanent areas
planned will be
approved plans.
where immediate construction
irrigated in accordance with
Systems may include:
is
a. Low precipitation sprinkler heads
b. Moisture sensors
c. Check valves to prevent drainage out of low
heads.
d. Separation of different types of landscape
areas, elevations and climatic conditions and
exposures.
e. Common areas to be automated systems to
maximize conservation.
2. Temporary areas (to be altered by future
construction).
a. No irrigation to be installed.
b. straw punching.
c. Water shall be natural rainfall. (Landscaping
installed during rainy season).
3. Interior minor slopes landscape areas
a. May be treated in a temporary manner with no
irrigation, (non-irrigated hydroseed mix),
and straw punching.
b. Once construction occurs, the permanent
irrigation will be installed.
Subject to approval by City Landscape Architect.
4. Exterior slopes adjacent to native areas.
a. Initially no irrigation will be provided.
The "Rancho del Rey Revegetation Method" will
be used. Plant material establishment will
be monitored for 3 to 5 years. If satis-
factory results do not occur, the city may
A-5
3'-.3~~
. 1> J
require that a permanent irrigation system be
installed.
LANDSCAPING
Landscaping will be carefully planned to provide erosion
control and stabilization, energy and water conservation,
visual aesthetics and overall enhancement to the community.
This will be achieved through appropriate plant material
selection, soil analysis and amendment, and landscape
installation.
A. Plant Material Selection
Landscape areas have been classified based on their
intensity of maintenance and water requirements. These
classifications are generally described as follows:
1.
Native Areas - These are existing vegetated areas
undisturbed by construction operations. Natural
rainfall only is required for irrigation.
Periodic clean-up and grubbing of seasonal growth
may be required for fire brush management.
2.
Naturalized Areas - These are newly planted areas
adjacent to native areas. Temporary irrigation
may be provided. The "Rancho del Rey Revegetation
Method" will be used. During the rainy season,
supplemental trees and shrubs will be planted at
the ratio of 115 plants per 1,000 square feet (30%
shall be trees and 70% shrubs).
NOTE:
Plant material selections will be coordinated with
the City Landscape Architect.
B. Soil Analysis and Amendment
1. To assist in plant material designation, careful
analysis of the Rancho del Rey soils will be
completed by an independent soils laboratory.
2. Recommendations for soil amendment will also be
given by the laboratory.
3. Soils in the general area appear to possess these
characteristics:
a. Unbalanced nutrients
b. High in salt content
A-6
3 I - 3 {,3
. " ,
c. High clay content
4. The amendment program will:
a. Add organic matter and nutrients for healthy
plant growth, where required.
b. Chemically treat the soil to reduce salt
content, increase permeability, establish
correct pH and alleviate any harmful elements
such a boron.
c. May include amendment to improve the water
retention capabilities of the soil, i.e.,
"agricultural polymers.
MAINTENANCE
Once the irrigation and landscape are installed, proper
maintenance shall be the key to efficient water use.
A. Irrigation/Landscape
1. The irrigation system shall be systematically
adjusted and monitored to provide optimum moisture
without over-water or runoff.
2. Expertly trained personnel shall operate the
system to its maximum efficiency and benefit.
3. Routine field observations shall be made to review
irrigation operation and landscape conditions.
Adjustments, if. necessary, shall be made in an
expedient manner.
4. On a periodic basis, the irrigation and
landscaping shall be re-evaluated to determine how
efficiency and conservation can be improved.
5. Once drought tolerant landscape areas are
established, the frequency of watering shall be
reduced.
6. Temporary irrigation to be removed by Developer at
turnover to Open Space Maintenance District.
A-7
3/-311'1
- RESIDENTIAL DESIGN GUIDELINES
Rancho del Rey SPA III
SUBMITTAL DRAFT
August 10, 1990
Revised 10/26/90
12/18/90
3/4/91
Prepared for:
Rancho del Rey Partnership
2727 Hoover Avenue
National City, CA 92050
Prepared by:
Cinti & Associates
1133 Columbia Street #201
San Diego, CA 92101
(619) 239-1815
.J I - 31P.5
TABLE OF CONTENTS
(Continued)
Paqe
SITE PLANNING CRITERIA................................... VI-1
Product Development
Site Development Standards
Design Issues by Parcel
(08/10/90)
ii
:31-3~(,
Purpose
This document is q manual to guide the design of site plans,
architecture, and landscape architecture within Sectional Plan-
ning Area III (SPA III) of the Rancho del Rey Planned
Community. It illustrates the master developer's philosophy and
commitment to a high quality, planned development program.
These guidelines address the design issues relevant to develop-
ment within SPA III. Separate manuals have been prepared for
areas within SPAs I and II. The applicable area is depicted
below.
SPA III
Design Guidelines
Area
(02/02/90)
1-2 3 I - 3 ~ ~
dered in the overall community design and theme. Current and
planned construction within SPAs I and II will establish numer-
ous precedents for the "community aesthetic" of Rancho del Rey.
The established standards and guidelines for these areas are
reflected in this SPA III document.
Relevant Planninq Documents
This Design Manual is the latest in a series of documents which
have, in increasing detail, established the development and
design standards for the Rancho del Rey Planned Community. The
most general standards are contained in the EI Rancho del Rey
Specific Plan which is incorporated in the City's General Plan
for the property. The Specific Plan allocates land uses and
intensities throughout the planning area and establishes general
regulations and guidelines for development, as well as preserva-
tion and conservation of open space and other on-site resources.
The second level of planning is achieved through the plans pre-
pared for each of the three SPAs which comprise the then undevel-
oped portion of the specific plan area. SPA I was the first of
these areas to be planned and is now under construction. It
encompasses the majority of the property north of East "R"
Street. The remainder of that area, directly adjacent to Terra
Nova, has been planned as SPA II. The area to the south, be-
tween East "H" Street and Telegraph Canyon Road, is SPA III. It
is the final planning phase of the project and the subject of
these guidelines.
The SPA Plan and companion Planned Community (PC) District
Regulations expand upon the provisions of the Specific Plan and
provide more detailed design specifications and regulations.
The focus of the SPA Plan is the delineation of community level
facilities (e.g., collector roads, neighborhood parks, trail and
open space system, etc.) while also providing some site specific
information such as basic grading design, lotting and interior
street layouts. The PC Regulations provide the use and devel-
opment standards which are applied to individual lots. These
regulations should be reviewed during the design process for
height, bulk, and setback standards.
Desiqn Influences
The primary influences which affected the design of the SPA III
Plan were the adopted EI Rancho del Rey Specific Plan, existing
improvements, and the landform characteristics of the site, as
depicted in Exhibit 1. The topography of the site consists pri-
marily of east-west trending ridges and intervening valleys.
The primary topographic feature of the SPA III site is the cen-
tral ridge which separates the southern leg of the Rice Canyon
Open Space Preserve and Telegraph Canyon. Rice Canyon contains
sensitive biological resources which are to be respected during
the development process. The development plan places develop-
(02/23/90)
1-4 31:1" 8
ment areas on higher elevations while maintaining the canyon in
natural open space with some recreational uses, as was done with
the northern and central legs of Rice Canyon in SPAs I and II.
As illustrated in Exhibit 1, Design Influences, the preserved
side slopes are intended to provide a natural open space back-
drop for development. Graded slope areas are to be planted with
naturalized species to also contribute to this effect. The
location of the development areas provides numerous view oppor-
tunities, but will also necessitate screening and other design
features to maintain a high aesthetic quality throughout the
community and as viewed from off-site. A primary design con-
sideration is the integration of development into the natural
setting while preserving the natural ambiance of the canyon
area. Another primary consideration is the integration of SPA
III with the existing development which adjoins most edges of
the project. Projects within SPA III will need to balance the
"Rancho del Rey aesthetic" with the existing designs and pat-
terns of development on adjacent property.
Community Concept
The Rancho del Rey Planned Community includes a diversity of
residential products, together with employment and support land
uses in a well planned arrangement, (see Exhibit 2, Site
Utilization Plan). The predominant residential product in the
overall project is the single family detached (SFD) home which
is sited on a variety of lot sizes. Within SPA III, SFD pro-
ducts are proposed in the western and central portions of the
site. A single townhouse site is designated at the southeastern
corner of the project, south of East "J" Street. The residen-
tial parcel at the northern edge, along East "H" Street, is
designated for Specialty Housing. This will most likely be a
retirement housing project which may include two or more product
types, attached and/or detached.
To the south of the Specialty Housing site is the southern leg
of Rice Canyon, designated for open space. The other major
on-site open space area is on the southern edge of the project,
an open space buffer along Telegraph Canyon Road. These areas
continue the pattern of using open space as both an amenity and
the setting for the Rancho del Rey Community which was establish-
ed by the Specific Plan and implemented in SPAs I and II. The
major proposed public use within the project is a junior high
school site located at the southeast corner oJ Paseo Ranchero
and East "J" Street. A large neighbor hood park site is provid-
ed between the junior high school and townhouse residential
sites. A small community facility site is located along Paseo
Ladera, on the western edge of the project. The arrangement of
these public uses necessitates an amendment to the EI Rancho del
Rey Specific Plan which will be accomplished concurrent with SPA
Plan adoption.
The major circulation routes through the project are Paseo
Ranchero and East "J" Street. Paseo Ranchero and an off-street
(10/26/90)
1-6
JI- 310'
trail system provide connections between SPA III and the major
public facilities located to the north in SPA I. The realign-
ment of East "J" Street so that it does not connect to Buena
Vista Way, east of Paseo Ranchero, also requires a General/
Specific Plan Amendment which has been incorporated with SPA
Plan approval.
(10/26/90)
'-8
3'.... 3 TO
:l:ntroduction and SUllllllarv
The design review process includes two integrated procedures:
design review and approval by the master developer and review
and approval by the City of Chula Vista. Essentially the pro-
cess requires the builder to formulate the design for his parcel
and review it with the master developer prior to formal applica-
tion and review of final designs by the City. The City of Chula
Vista requires Site Plan and Architectural Review, as well as
Landscape Review. The overall process is sketched below.
~~
DESIGN REVIEW
PROCESS CHART
~ /Y!!:tI1Ei' ,f
~~
~q-vr
~~av
~.
~~dl:t
~.~
~
~
~ elrr~
~
. . .
(02/02/90)
1-2
3/- .3 1-1
The City has also published a "Landscape Manual" which describes
the landscape review process and provides some guidelines for
landscape design from the City's perspective. The Manual also
includes specific standards for landscape and irrigation improve-
ments.
(02/02/90)
1-4 3/- 3r~
Introduction
The character of the Rancho del Rey Community at the broadest
level is established by the EI Rancho del Rey Specific Plan and
SPA Plans. During the preparation of these plans, numerous com-
munity design features were established or considered. As indi-
vidual parcels are developed, attention to these established cri-
teria is necessary to successfully execute the intended design.
This section is intended to describe and promote the design fea-
tures of the SPA Plan and to provide guidance for consistent
detailed design. Several SPA Plan Exhibits which address these
design issues have been reproduced herein for reference. The
following chapter, General Development Guidelines, addresses
those design issues (e.g., architecture, lighting, parking,
etc.) which were not intregral to the previous plans.
Circulation
The circulation network provides both a physical and visual con-
nection between residential neighborhoods. The overall street
circulation plan is indicated in Exhibit 3 on the following
page. The exhibit also illustrates typical road sections. In
addition, a comprehensive system trails for pedestrian and
bicyclist use has been included throughout the community. The
SPA III trail system includes a hiking trail which extends the
length of the southern leg of the Rice Canyon OPen Space Pre-
serve and connects to a regional network through SPA I. Access
to the trail system will be site planning issue for some
parcels.
Special landscape designs and treatments have been established
for community entries, parcel entries and streetscapes. These
are discussed in the Landscape Design section of these Guide-
lines and should be referenced for further information.
(02/23/90)
11-2
3/-31-3
Trails
The interconnecting trail system provided in SPA III is
graphically shown in Exhibit 4 on the following page.
Trails in open space areas such as the southern leg of Rice
Canyon are to be aligned and constructed to minimize adverse
impacts to sensitive biological resources. Trails should
follow utility access roads and existing paths whenever
feasible to minimize disturbance of natural vegetation.
The SPA III trail system will provide a connection between
the existing residential development west of the project
site and the school and park amenities at the northeastern
edge. Schools and parks, including the on-site junior high
school and neighborhood park are expected to be the primary
destinations of trail users and are indicated on the Trails
exhibit. In addition to pedestrian and hiking trails, a
bicycle trail (bike lane) connection is provided between the
existing bicycle routes on Telegraph Canyon Road and East
"R" Street. The SPA III trail system will connect to the
system within the Sunbow community, south of Telegraph
Canyon Road, via Paseo Ladera. These routes will encourage
non-vehicular circulation within the community. Final
location of the trail system is subject to review by the
City Parks and recreation Department.
A sketch on a following page illustrates the trail crossing
at Paseo Ranchero. The sketch also includes a section which
describes the grading adjacent to the roadway. At the can-
yon crossing, the streetscape will be comprised primarily of
views down and across either side of the canyon. Some of
the landscaping installed on the down slopes adjacent to the
roadway will also be visible.
Access from the SPA III neighborhood park to the trail
paralleling Telegraph Canyon Road will also be provided. A
sketch conceptually illustrating the access route is
provided. Recontouring of the slopes facing Buena Vista
Way, to improve the appearance and reduce maintenance of the
slope, are also illustrated.
(03/04/91 )
11I-4 31 - 3T'I
d
PASEO RANCHERO
at RICE. CANYON
~ fl-.t:~. ~
~ ~
qwr~tV Jn4dL.
f)fiVl!fZIffI!j'#T
~
..r...--.......--------
.-
1-6 31 - 3 ':I-~
Gradinq
Attention to detail in the execution of grading is important at
both the mass grading and detail grading levels. The EI Rancho
del Rey Specific Plan included design standards for grading.
The most relevant portion is repeated below. The Alternative
Grading Concept (Exhibit 5) is responsive to these policies as
well as those of the General Plan Land Use Element. Final
design should reflect the approved conceptual design. The
requirements of the Chula Vista Grading Ordinance and other city
policies, which are not superseded by those herein, shall also
be incorporated in grading plans for development within the SPA.
Grading Standard
The design intention of the specific plan is that graded
areas be contoured to blend with natural landforms. Round-
ing both vertical and horizontal intersections of graded
planes, obscuring slope drainage structures by massing a
variety of plant materials, incorporating variable slope
ratios for larger slope banks, use of landscape planting to
control erosion and obscure man-made banks, architectural
solutions to topographic changes, and other similar tech-
niques should be used. Slope banks with rigid angular
characteristics shall not be permitted.
Slope Banks - General
The following guidelines are summarized from the SPA III
Plan. Specific standards will be implemented through the
tentative tract map process.
Slope banks should be constructed at 2:1 or less
(unless otherwise approved).
Erosion potential on all slopes should be reduced
through the use of small berms at the top of the slope,
drainage improvements, and/or the use of appropriate
vegetation (see Landscape Design).
Provision should be made for adequate maintenance of
graded slopes and landscaping.
Streetscape Slopes
The City's Street Design Standards Policy establishes stan-
dards for the grading of slopes adjacent to the right-of-way
of major streets. These generalized standards are applied
unless more precise designs are submitted and approved in
conjunction with the project planning process. Considerable
attention has been given to streetscape appearance in the
design of SPA III and generalized design concept is included
in this chapter (see Streetscapes). A more detailed evalua-
tion of landscaping and slope design, utilizing the design
criteria and concept presented in these Guidelines, shall
(03/04/91 )
:!"'I - 3=1- ~
WI-
>a.
-w
t;;:o
ZZ
a:O
Wo
!::iC)
<z
C
<
a:
C)
;h~ II.
!i~ ~I!
I<~i k
.-- ~' , ~.I U! ! 5
.~~~.~.. ... . . ,;. :; ,I !I
,'.:O:r":(0.'.I ~ ..- '>'-. \ ' ' " '~ I!
~<","\O,",,' i '_,';" .~
\\_J.....~.. '.-']' - I ~ _, . 'll
'r,,:--- \- . \ \ \\. __ \
. :'--.:'~.: " , . ~\ Ii \\ --' '.
~~ ' - ~
/ '" \ \ r \';- \.
\. \' ,'~ ;,. \\_- !!I! '\ -di~)
\~ -' :,', \ . 1~~~ ~ --d....':;:?
\~..-2....:..~~~, ,l... !~.;:::""",,,-\\ .
// I~, i i~ 1:' \~~~!\ i ;.-,
\ I.~ j :ai...,4: ., +\ /-~ I~ _ ~4.
\.' ~ . t,f1-" - ~ ~a~!~~~ r- r
, ~ \ ~" Itl".J5~ai ~~~.~ai !,-:.
~\ -," I f!f-' i~l~! ~5:1! '~c_-::,
I", '8 ,i,~.-<\.:, ,;.. ,\ '=-C~, II
G e!_ ". · ,I ~'~I,,',"'" 'I l" . " ~ ' ',__:, ',' \
B ~ ~ "dPiiV:f:i ' I'~ ~~' ',Il ";/~.,,, \
18 ~ ~~ ~ ~J I I " r-:-:. \ .
II;~ .< ~ tI:~"'{~) 'f. ,: " L:( '\ \ I'
-'1" ,rJr__ 1" I
! d! ,,'\'\' I, '-. .~ t' ""~~__,; ....-/". 1
a '~%/;i- ,'-. ;~ i~~ ~~ ,.., :
~ /.';~ ' " '-. !!~! ~~ ,
'I ' :~\. ~'" ~i ~~.. ,II
..~ , O' ~.
I=i,. !;tCl_';;~ ~ fj~
I i~t /: "" " !!!=~i U
~.': as.Hl
B ~,. ~.~ i
X !
:" ~~i
c ~~w
j i~~
~,/ ;." 3di~
-- Ii ~
~ ,
i-a
dl
~i
~
- i -
..
'"
13ii
'~~
~ .
. .
l'.~ '
;Iii~';-
,
10-9
3/' 3 -=1-:r-
~I ~
0.,1 )I
u-
S,
EJ
~1
~~
Bi
8i
a~
[II
ALTERNATIVE GRADING PLAN
SPECIALTY HOUSING WEST
-
I E
\-..~
.....
oq
CREATE FllllENGTH
PUBlIC TRAL along
CANYON RIM. USE 3: 1
CONTOURING to
TRANSITION 10 NATURAl.
CONTOUR SlOPES
--..~
Easl 'H" 81
-- reel
.
.
~
REDUCE 52' IIGH CANYON
FLL Sl.OPE TO 32' in CANYON
and 22' above PUBLIC TRAIL.
CONTOUR TRANSITION SlOPE
10 NATURAl. CANYON SLOPE
REDUCED from 61' 10 40'
in CANYON with 21' above
PUBLIC TRAIL.
.~QQ~R2yBQ'
Ci1ti
--
10/30/90 It...nt.."
Entries
Entries serve two primary purposes. The first is informational;
they identify the community or neighborhood. To this end, entry
graphics must be clearly readable to the motorists and not so
overly sculpted and landscaped that their basic message becomes
obscured.
The second purpose is to provide unifying design accents through-
out the community. If each project or neighborhood attempted to
compete for attention via their entries, the overall unity of
the community would be decreased. Therefore, there will be a
common design treatment for all entries to reinforce the overall
sense of community.
Entry monumentation will be provided by both the master develop-
er and individual builders. There are three primary types of
entries: major entries, minor entries, and gated entries. The
approximate location of these entries is depicted on Exhibit 6,
Community Signage.
(02/02/90)
3/-39-9
1-10
Major Entries
Major entries are those which provide access to the entire
community. They consist of special monumentation and land-
scape planting, as illustrated below.
These entries should be designed to create a portal and
convey a sense of arrival. They will inform the motorist
that this is the entrance to the Rancho del Rey Community.
They will include design features that are consistent with
community fencing materials and may include a mock guard
house element. Entry design should flow with the terrain
and appear to be an extension of adjacent land forms.
---------
-----..---
Minor Entries
These are the entries to the individual parcels in Rancho
del Rey. They are to be designed as an enhanced extension
of the community fencing detail. These should be limited to
the one or two major entry points into a parcel and will
provide visitors with the project name identification. The
master developer will provide individual builders with proto-
typical details of these entry treatments to insure conti-
nuity.
(02/02/90)
3 I - 3i 0
1-12
Below are the elevations of the Rancho del Rey fencing program.
These are to be used for all fencing indicted on the Fencing
Plan, Exhibit 7, on the preceding page. Fencing for townhome and
multi-family projects are not specified on the fencing plan,
because the placement of such fences will be a design detail of
each individual site plan in these areas. However, any fencing
proposed in these attached residential neighborhoods shall use
the same fencing style as indicated for the single family detach-
ed areas. Pilasters with the spherical cap shown in the sketches
should be used occasionally for design continuity along long
fence runs and at fencing "end points" (e.g., all entries, and
where substantial changes in direction or elevation occur). A
flat cap (no sphere) shall be used at other pilaster locations.
Pilasters should be provided at each property line intersection
or at a maximum spacing of 50 feet.
.
:r-
"
CONCfliETE alOCK
WI lTUCCO ,...104
SOUND WALL(Noise)1
V" SOLID WALL
CONCMTI' ..OCI( ......TP
WI lTUCCO '...H T"r~tC"L
r1I
f... _
CONCIIIETI! kOCK
WI lTUCCO ......
l'"
~
<.~ LOW FENCE
.",.};
OPEN-THEME
VIEW FENCE
LOW WAU.
.
.t
"
" .
SOLID FENCE
V" with PILASTERS
".'.
.TUCCO,........
~ .............
(02/02/90)
3 I -;it; I
111-14
COORDINATING FENCE HEIGHTS
~ ~ 1It~
JAW f7'4.WT fltco
FEWce .f{IG,~wr
~ pOJfIY
~
f)!'/ 71ft)
'#P~
~
(Y 11f/rJ
31-a8~
111-16
ALTERNATIVE SENSITIVE EDGE TREATMENTS
~ ". 1'1lt6
a;V7l/V(/otl~ 7W~
6~1o/ /fOt'fe5
~~70H
fT'r~
P, 11/15
//VC4N~/Y'<7e 5(/lGt-G:
s~N ~E3IJT~
~~V~
/PJ?I71~fYAt-
~
.
I
3/- 3V.3
111-18
School/Park Interfaces
Although schools and parks are generally considered to be
compatible with residential uses, some level of conflict is
unavoidable and a buffer must be provided. Whenever pos-
sible the buffer should include a change in elevation, plac-
ing the residential units higher. A difference of only
three or four feet is a significant improvement. Dense
planting of the slope and fencing should also be provided to
create a physical and visual separation. If sufficient
slope height is provided, an open fence could be used to
allow views from the residential lots across the open park
area. These features should provide an aesthetically pleas-
ing perimeter to the school or park while minimizing the
intrusion of noise and distractions to the adjacent home
sites.
SDG&E Easement
A major SDG&E easement runs through the western portion of
the community. This corridor divides the R-8 development
parcels and presents both an opportunity and a constraint.
The opportunity arises from the open space characteristics
of the feature which also incorporates the trail network.
The constraint lies in the limitations on the type of land-
scaping that can occur consistent with SDG&E restrictions.
Nonetheless, a fundamental design concept is that the
easement interface should not become a hard brown edge;
landscaping on the adjacent parcels should be blended into
the easement area to create a soft edge. See the Landscape
Design section for addition information.
(08/10/90)
3/-3B'I-
UI-20
~
Scenic Corridors
Two off-site scenic corridors will be affected by develop-
ment within SPA III. These are the Telegraph Canyon Road
and East "H" Street corridors. Views from these streets to
residential development areas will mainly comprise rear unit
elevations and rooflines, rear yard fencing, and some graded
slope areas. In such visible areas, attention will need to
be given to the aesthetics of the rear exposure, as well as
the front. Additional rear elevation detailing, variable
lot depths or rear yard setbacks, and special slope land-
scaping should be considered as potential design solutions.
The canyon interface discussion and the landscape design
section of these Guidelines should be referenced for addi-
tional guidance. Additional discussion of this issue is
included in the SPA III Plan in Section VI.7.
The detailed guidelines for Parcel R-7 include design
criteria for the special setback area along a portion of
East "H" Street which borders on that development parcel.
Special attention should also be given to the graded slope
at the corner of Paseo Ranchero and Telegraph Canyon Road.
This area, adjacent to the junior high school site, is
visible, both as a project entry and a component of the
Telegraph Canyon Road scenic corridor. Design efforts
should be directed toward achieving a rustic/natural
character while maintaining site area for the school. The
incorporation of boulders or other techniques to retain the
slope, or provide opportunities for special landscaping to
"naturalize" the slope appearance should be considered.
(12/18/90)
3/- ''8.5
111-22
m..
< j I I I II
.
< I
i ~ I
it J \ t
, \1
( I -
, t~ I \1 L( -
I
ffi t 11 I
) I i I, ~J i
i .1
\,
.
~* I
W "" ~
~
~l!ill
tb'[]
I .D~
1]! !'
~!(
@
~
,~ E
D.7\r:.~E
"~~~
II ,\",,- ,r._.J
Ii '~,
/ ',fill " "
)"",{!f) SFD "'\ ' SFD
, .t/I " "-
/:l~~ /;::~ I 11111
/ fJ /'. ~-' ~~_---.i JI~
/}~' -'r'-~ ,..-r_
"I /1 I'~--'l
/ . Cb\It1tIVITY I I
i/ / fjA(:(tll1' \ I
\'..~;; )
~ . . -'"' Plan Detail/
, Extra Setback Area .
I. . lor Garages
"U Taking Access
~ along" J" Streel _
~ / Extra Setback Area
1i ; SFD Acce~': ~rag"~~ ~kong
li~j -- r- -.-1_ a/reel
~:~=-~ .-L~
.~ ~~'~~1LF-
1--..1 I ISFD, I J
I ~-I.l I.
STREETSCAPE
East "J" Street/
Paseo Ladera
-.
~'> \\
SFD
(
\. Plan Detail
Communily
Theme Fencing
Variable Slope / SFD
\_ ~U;.
~_. . '" 0 ~. TOWNHOUSE
~f--. yariable Slope SITE
PARK SITE iii' i Transition Area -
Park ~ ~
ParkInQ Area.' r
~
111~SJ19~RQ~~eyBE
riM n n r-1 Gint"
U IU U !~,~~~
12111190
..
Q.
-0
SFD Ncn
55' -1
5:1 Slope
60' R.Ow.
~
11~l!9~Q~~eyB!!
,3/IIf!"ldt8'
STREETSCAPE
SECTIONS
=<=e";i;~
section
SFD
60' R.O.w.
2:1
Slope
Section E-E
Paseo Ladera
Jr. High
School Site
Section D-D
East "J" Street
.rtrlI
anti
&~
'61Q. 139 'e'~
(08/10/90)
IV. GENERAL DEVELOPMENT GUIDELINES
IV-,
31-~gCj
pp
THIS NOT THIS
] /[
-.
~ ~%-rit11-~-
OtJ ~y GUiiI/,A71~/Y$
. .
o
/tfP/P ~~ ~
PtJA'T 1/$ ~ f'1~
~ ~ Q~v71i7IY
~<S FI/I~ I"/~ii/7(/c-r.
.
1iI
fa
OPIYT hG-T a.e~/Vs
/!!eCtJ1f!3- I1P(V ~ TP;VOtl!7
IV-3
3 I - 3 '0
S!qn!nq
In the SPA Plan, the distinction is made between permanent and
temporary signs. Some aspects of permanent community signing
have been previously discussed under "Entries" in this manual.
The illustrations below provide some common sense guidance in
the design of temporary signs. Within the SPA III Plan, Chapter
XI - Comprehensive Sign Regulations should be consulted for
specific sign restrictions (e.g., sizes, permit requirements,
prohibitions, etc.).
THIS
C4~ ~~
~~
'I'
+-
..
1Y/~Nlf7E= ~
NOT THIS
~spwr ~~
~~
1;:
//0.Pf'I'-4'~Q"\-re- ~
1V-5
3/-391
~~ ~
!Iffi
tf/P%-~Ke
,.
~
STREET LIGHTING FIXTURE
IV.7
31-39~
3/- ~~ .3
"f9&~"'r~
No- ~fl .JJ::{:Zt.. IzL.
V77W~.~ ~ VI' (/u.
~~,'f t'/'VY'IIIG tA'75
"',f'tNfJ'
//yw/J'!!?
;%IF
BREAK-UP of INTERIOR PARKING AREAS
PARKING PLANTERS
IV-9
-3/-- ?l1~
v. LANDSCAPE DESIGN
(08/10/90)
V-l
'3/- 3'.5
Landscape Concept
The general components of the landscape concept are as follows:
Parcel or Specific District (theme trees)
Each neighborhood may have a distinctive architectural
theme. Selected landscape elements, including trees, should
reflect that theme.
Streets (dominant, support street trees)
Landscaping of streets ~ill provide continuity throughout
the community and create the appropriate link with adjacent
areas. East "H" Street, East "J" Street, Telegraph Canyon
Road and Paseo Ranchero will continue existing tree patterns
established by the City of Chula Vista. streets within indi-
vidual neighborhoods will reflect the neighborhood design
character.
Special materials within a landscape buffer will be
installed in masses with earthen berms along East "H" Street
to reinforce the established streetscape pattern within the
Employment Park across the street. Special attention will
also be paid to the graded area near the water tank.
Landmarks (theme trees)
Each major
character.
sites.
and minor landmark may have its own distinct
Landmarks in SPA III include the school and park
Entries (accent trees)
Entries are in three categories (see Entries in Chapter 4,
herein) :
Major Entry (community entry)
Minor Entry (neighborhood entry)
Gated Entry (special entry)
Accent trees will be used to contrast with designated street
trees. Major entry accent trees will be pre-selected; how-
ever, the minor and gate guarded entry trees will be selec-
ted by the builder subject to approval by Master Developer
and the City of Chula Vista.
Arterial Accent Planting
Flowering accent tress will be used at these major and minor
focal points to provide distinctive contrast.
(12/18/90)
V-3
31"?>'C,
w
<
u.
-
\
\)ol
..a
~
~
~
fA
'<.!J
............. .....
.....................
.....................
.....................
.... ...... ....
~
pARK PLAN1lNGI
Hlgft-brancNng ......... aM
CMeIOuaue t,... ..........1Il
_...........,I.t."'O"~
.....................11......
.ec.... ,... ......----
10"'..........'_'_.
ARTERIAl. ACCENT ....."NTIHG
fktweringl'........acc...."..
or .ound<:o..... I' an...." poinI.
ENHANCED ILOPE PLANTING
V.,Ue..........."......,......
PIIItI'nt1 w1ll1llow..................
...........-*0".....
HA1lMALlZEO PLANTiNG
...1....~...I......Ud......._
lIhr...to~cII.IrIlbecl......Of
~. willi Mlural OC*I ...~.
FUEL MOOtFCA TION ZONE
Acl.... toc.IIofIIOb.d.'....ln.d
lollowlng plolUnllo, bundlng,
I' Ipe,1 01 11'.. IUlel,. pll"
,1Ib"llt,1. Pill'll ....'..1... 1",11
con,ll' ollow-h.I' ,hlub' lno
",ounde..."'.
D
D
---
---
~
(!!It
ARTERIAL PLANTINO
Pllnl ""t..I,I, In conlhwllr
wl'h "'IUnll'''''''' Ind CIl,
t......c... ",c:llltlcl', II,nd,rlll.
EAST oW STREET BUfFER
Low ........n ,twubl In "'.....'"
cOtoObln,lIOfl wl'" ..,111 bl'..... Plant
1111,.,1.1. In contlnulllf wllh SPA I
EMploymen, P.r. IC,.entng 10
r.lntOfc...IIUnglhefn..
RESERVOIR 8CREENlHCJ
F..'.... bolh ....11ng ....,.....
"... .ndlow ...r...n .tv"b.ln
........10 Icr.en w.l... .......olr.
.~QQ~Bm'
General Landscape Plan
--;-\
--~;;, .
...r:. {J'" , \
.... - (f~ \
'<,/1 \
/\
\ :
, \---
.
\
~?
=~~ ~?~
" ~~ ~.,.~~\
. ,~~ f#l!!.p II
-..-.... ~~__ E... " ".... _~~~~ Ih
~'''-'''' ~~~==..=====ara~,~~'''~. ",:r: I.
-- . ~~" ~~=-'l..~~((~ cP' "'... .
--...... I " ...l /
.-....1 ~ . /'f
\;> . .'
-......-.... .. ~, / /J
..-..... V'\7<:;:?_/ '
.-......----..--.y ~ ,,,III''}/J \,/
--. \ "bl ~
DEVELOPMENT AREA Pl.AHTlHO ..,
. .,---
".nllllO' wllNn ....Iopllt .,... '\' l
.h." b11fN1 willi .." pl.ntlno' l- \1 n
... ".'M" ".,,,.., ... '" .~_.i . 't' <J..
....01 In.l.lOU.I.III. , p
tJ~ '," 0 ~~L' \.... .. (?J,\' /
NATUAALOPEN IPACE .. fl- i"~_r::::Jj ,4
-1,;' ;;;r--...J "\\ ','
/1,. 11 r-..-1 \ \. "'::'. ./
( ,r- ~\~\\' .--.~
Jd.. ~~,~. //
/' .,,) .' __ __..--. -l~~
I " ~\ \' ..~;
\ " c..n'lol"
1...1 _J;::::O:-'"
.......---...
.,,,,""
\
\
I
\
\
"
1\
7123/90~ iuI
Ci1Ii
.~
1619'
.......-
Slope Erosion Control
All slope erosion control planting shall conform to the'require-
ments of the "City of Chula Vista Landscape Manual" and the
City Landscape Architect.
The general intent of the slope erosion control program is to
protect newly created slopes or denuded areas from erosion or
unsightliness. Dust abatement is also a concern.
All areas of the site on which new grades have been created or
vegetation has been disturbed will be planted. One of two types
of planting will be required.
Type I plantings are those which require ongoing irrigation to
supplement natural rainfall. Generally, all areas adjacent to
street right-of-ways will be Type I plantings. The City
Landscape Architect may designate any other areas as Type 1 to
maintain the aesthetic quality of the community. Fire resistant
strips which are necessary between structures and natural open
space will be included in Type I planting.
Type II plantings are defined as areas which, once
will survive and grow with only natural rainfall.
Type II planting could be hydro-seeded with native
which is then irrigated until established.
establi shed,
For example,
vegetation
(12/18/90)
V-7
3'" ?/If{
Natural ~ Space Enhancement
The Rancho Del Rey SPA III Plan provides for the preservation
and enhancement of significant areas of open space. The major
areas are the southern leg of Rice Canyons, buffer along
Telegraph Canyon Road, and the SDG&E Easement. These areas
provide several unique opportunities:
- Preservation of unique natural resources and wildlife
habitats.
Nature Study experience.
- Drainage basins for runoff.
- Less pollution, more oxygen in the atmosphere.
- View corridors.
Uses
The following are appropriate uses within the Open Space
areas:
Rice Canyon
Sensitive plant and wildlife habitat preservation
Nature study
Trail systems
SDG&E Easement
Improved park & recreation facilities
Parking
Trail systems
Picnic areas
Nature study
Other day use activities
Teleqraph Canyon Open Space Buffer
Sensitive plant and wildlife habitat preservation
(02/02/90)
V-9
3/- 3'"
(12/18/90)
SDG&E Easement
Landscaping within the SDG&E Easement shall con-
form to agency restrictions. The actual zones may.
vary among fuel modification, naturalized, native
and ornamental areas, based on the adjacent areas.
V-ll
3/-1/00
PLlUlT MATERIALS MAnn
KEY: MAN - Manicured
ORN - Ornamental
DTN - Drought TOlerant/Naturalized
FM - Fuel Modification
NAT - Native
/Wi ORN DTN FM NAT
TREES
Albizzia julibriBsin 0
Arecastrum romanzoffianum 0 0
Bauhinia variegata 0 0
Brachychiton acerifolia 0
eupaniopsie anacardiodieB 0 0
Erythrina coralloidieB 0
Eucalyptus species 0 .
Ficus rubiginosa 0
Jacaranda acutifolia 0
Koelreuteria bipinnata 0 0
LeptoBpermum laevigatum 0
Liquidambar Btyraciflua 0
Magnolia grandiflora 0
Melaleuca leucadendra 0
Pinus canariensis 0 0 0
Pinu8 species 0 . 0
PlatanuB acerifolia/racemosa 0 0
PopuluB species 0 0
Prunus ceraaifera 0 0
pyrus bradfordii 0 0
PyruB kawakamii 0 0
Quercus agrifolia 0
SchinuB molle 0
SHRUBS
Acacia redolenB .
AgapanthuB africanuB 0 0
ArcotoBtaphyloB species . .
Artemisia (low growing) . .
BUXUB sempevirens . .
CalliBternon citrinus . .
Camellia specieB 0
Ceanothus species . . .
Cistus species .
Coprosma kirkii 0 0
Cotoneaster species . .
Dodonaea viscosa .
Elaeagnus . .
Eacallonia 0 . .
Eugenia uniflora 0 .
Feijoa sellowiana 0
Hemerocallis hybrids .
Hetermoles arbutifolia . .
Hibiscus rOBa-sinenBis 0
Juniperus specieB 0 0
Lantana sellowiana . .
(10/26/90)
V.13
3' ..i/ol
~ Modification Landscapinq
A fuel modification zone must be established between natural
open spaces and building development. This zone will consist of
an area cleared of natural brush and modified by the addition of
fire retardant materials (see list under "Natural Open Space
Enhancement"), and an automatic irrigation system. The minimum
width of this zone shall be established by the City of Chula
Vista Fire Marshal. Plants should vary in height and be planted
in random patterns to avoid a hard edge appearance.
(~!ifi;fJfti'/~1/I)
~ ,P~~:S
~ ~
, ~JXf
W~
~.
FUEL MODIFICATION ZONE
(10/26/90)
V-15
a'- '1o~
TYPICAL STREET TREE PATTERNS
SINGLE F AMll Y RESIDENTIAL
~ 1'~9 PIe:. f. #IT c."tVA'e~;V
V-17
3/- qo3
~m.
~+'~
LANDSCAPED P ARKW A YS
. .
1~J~{
/' ,,.
tFf~
PARKWAY with TRAFFIC GUARD
V-19
3'-'1 fJ'!
Landscape Standards
All landscape installation shall conform to the City of Chula
Vista Landscape Manual.
Streetscape and common area landscape shall be planted to the
following minimum standards:
Ground covers shall be used to cover the entire
planting area (flatted material at the appropriate
spacing or hydroseed with City and Master Developer
approval).
Spreading shrubs shall be used to eventually cover a
minimum of fifty (50%) percent of the area at mature
growth. Shrub and ground covers shall be selected from
the Plant Material Matrix.
Tree plantings shall consist of the designated
dominant, accent, and parcel trees.
A minimum of four (4) trees per 100 linear feet of
street frontage will be required. Spacing shall be 40
foot maximum. All trees will be staked in accordance
with the City Standard detail. Type, size, location,
and installation of trees in the City right-of-way
require City approval.
'II f~1 ~
~(/~ ~ }fj#/~CI#
(02/02/90)
V-21 3/-1./05
Open
Space
Maintenance
-' .r,~.~'~,
~....:.... I
--_I
--;u-- ....,
, .
v'
,-",.
--
"I
I
.....
It.J
<
'"
'"
, ~
! ."
. J'
",.
"
-
,
~
~
Open Space Maintenance District
NOTE: Final extent of O.S. Districts to
be established by tract maps.
.~QQ~kB!Y
r1l~~
10/18/90 ~j I...... I
Ci1ti
.-
''''~I I J<I '6'~
3. Interfaces
Refer to the "Edges" section for the type of
treatment. The following types of interfaces should be
recognized:
a. Canyon/Open Space Interface
Parcels R-1, R-2, R-3, R-6 & R-7. Conform to
"Fire Suppression/Fuel Modification" requirements.
b. Park or School Interface
Parcel R-6.
c. SDG&E Interface
Parcel R-7.
d. East "H" Street Landscaped Buffer
Parcel R-7.
4. Periphery Landscape
a. Periphery landscaping shall conform to the General
Landscape Plan.
b. Adherence to the streetscape techniques contained
herein will also be required.
5. Interior Landscape
a. There are two categories for interior landscape:
Developer installed - subject to Master
Developer and City approval.
Individual installed - Not subject to Master
Developer and City approval, except for pos-
sible encroachment into open space.
b. Developer installed landscape will include:
Slope erosion planting with manual irrigation
system. Systems to be connected to indivi-
dual house meter.
Street trees installed in the street tree
easement. Exact type, location and staking
of tree subject to approval by City.
(12/18/90)
V-25
?J /- 1./0 1-
Product Deve10pment
The Rancho del Rey SPA III Plan includes certain minimum resi-
dential property development standards. These have been repro-
duced below for reference. It should be understood however,
that adherence to these minimum standards will not automatically
create a project that will be acceptable to the City. The adop-
ted standards are intended to provide flexibility for creative
and efficient site planning, and innovative architectural solu-
tions. They are not intended to be used to create substandard
developments.
RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS
1.
Lot area (in net oOO's s.f.)
minimum
minimum average
2.
Lot width (in feet)
minimum
minimum average
3.
Lot depth (in feet)
4.
Lot coverage (percentage)
5.
Floor Area Ratio.
6~ Front yard setback (from
Public Street ROW)
a) To direct entry garage*.
b) To side entry garage..
c) To main residence
7. Side yard setback
8.
al To adjacent residential lot
(min. total/min. one side)
b) Distance between detached
residential units
c) To adjacent street
(corner lot)
Rear yard setback'
Building height, feet (maximum)2
(2-1/2 story maximum in RS & RP)
accessory bldg., maximum
9.
Land Use District
RS --'RP- RC RSP
'0/5
5.0
6.0
50
50
90
45
.55
15
10
15
10
10
15
28
15
3.5
4.0
SP
SP
40
45
SP
SP
90'
SP
SP
50
SP
SP
.60
SP
SP
15
10
, 0
SP
SP
SP
SP
SP
SP
10/3 SP
SP
, 0 SP
SP
10 SP
SP
15'
SP
SP
28
SP
SP
15
15
10. Parking spaces per unit
2 2 1.5 5P pp3
(gar.) (gar.) 1 bdrm
., guest unit
.May be modified with Site Plan approval
..Lots fronting on East "J" Street, west of Paseo
Ranchero: 28' direct entry, 23' side entry
garage in RS & RP districts
1 . f
Exception or one stacy structures per
19.26.150 CVMC
2Mdy be increased to 35 feet with Site Plan approval
JAs required for uses approved in Precise Plan
(12/18/90)
VI-2
31- 40~
2.0 5P
2 bdrm
unit
2.5 sp
3... bdrm
unit
HOUSING TYPE: SFD-Conventional
. EXAMPLE LOT SIZE: 50'x 1 QQ'
GO' 7Y/'I~
~It'
~
~
,
~
"-I
...................~
~
,~it.\
~~
TIfJ~ (5tJ(UJ//'Ia
,;q\VEl-OI'F
!!!rO Q;YVqvzTON'i--,
HT 5(U3- 91100
r.---~---~--)
I: frlr I
.1 I
I --, I
r' ,/ ~_,---_I.
L - \ __... AlIl'u
"" , "'<r-
I
I
\
I
\
I
\ .
I
\
I
I
VI-3
{)fM?;
~q'
'1fIj;?
aw
~
I
.
J
-J
~~~~
J-or wmle an:/.. nw~/tf
hZfWd;f6 ~/~t? / r
~~~~
3/-l./r/i
HOUSING TYPE: SFD-Cottage
EXAMPLE LOT SIZE: 40'x90'
~ '7Yt"7~
--
sIr~tf
.~~........... ...
I~' ~-=""""J ,
- I" ............................
.. 't
~~.
,~ .
~
..~ t~
~
~I
I
7Y!/~ 8fl/tO/I./G
p;WCU7~
6rO CDTJiA6e, ,
ur ~ . "fQ;<1P
VI-S
r<:..~- :;-.:;~~1
I ~ I
I' ~~ (
,I
I . ...-... ':
I I' , ,
I ., ,
\,...-.1 /J/,Ae ,-_""...J
I
I
~.
--
~f~ FUDj'--.
j...(JT fl/1tT/1iS.-J- ti'lI~
~dh ff~ ~~
fj 6;rr:e
3,-1110
Site DeveloPlllent Standards
Numerous site development criteria are included in Section VI.8
of the SPA III Plan. The following are presented as supplements
to those basic guidelines.
Single Family Products
On the following pages a series of lot/building schematics
are presented to provide additional guidance in the design
of single family housing types. The attached townhouse and
specialty developments follow. It should be stressed that
the schematics and building envelopes that follow are proto-
typical lotting concepts and are not intended to constrain
more creative solutions to spatial relationships. Special
attention is also given to the issues of streetscape quality
and corner lot situations in small lot areas. The open
cul-de-sac site planning technique is also illustrated.
Yard Restrictions
Careful attention to maintaining continuity of design during
initial construction can be negated by subsequent individual
homeowner improvements. Enclosed additions, patio struc-
tures, decks, storage sheds, fencing and other similar home-
owner improvements are of particular concern. Yet, restric-
tions such as setbacks, coverage, materials, etc. must
relate to the particular type of lot and residence
involved. In order to both control these homeowner improve-
ments and, at the same time, relate the restrictions to the
particular characteristics of the housing type involved, a
"Homeowner Improvements Guide" shall be a required component
of the mandated Site Plan Review. This supplement will
detail for each housing type, the specific restrictions on
the size and location of balconies, covered patios, enclosed
additions, or storage buildings. In addition, specific
guidance and restrictions shall be provided for materials,
colors and design characteristics. This supplement shall be
officially adopted as a component of the Site Plan Review
approval. And to insure continued conformance, it will also
become a component of the recorded CC&R's given to each new
home purchaser.
(08/10/90)
VI-7
31 - ~ II
CORNER LOT TREATMENT with SMALL LOTS
I .
I
(,(Jp t:i~ tJ!7fl
--
7w~~ fftEl{tW{
r I~
I I ./JI/lE 6~
I ~
~-
rbV~
~tV'P~
'"1/f-! .1 '
/0 '. /5
Jf/;r
/~'
r
/I'~
#:'Zf:P ~AS
VI-9
31 - i.//~
Open Space Fencing
(without Open Space Access)
OWjW {/liiJ 6~
C4Vr!)J/ltJ{)S \ / ~ rz-;rr
V/f]lIJ ~~ -1 tVm
---=: ." . ...........
--=: .......-"""'- .:%;;:~:;:::::::. :;':':'~::::~:i:~;~: .~" "'"'
---........ ."... -.; -...;
~........ .........~
14/}J. I~( .
VrtJ/)():ffI;fJ6 EiHO-
~~ ~~
er~ ~,( II- fiii1p.
fl:nICe
-----"
. ---------
VI-lOa
,'-'-/13
Attached Products
Site plans for attached products should consider the follow-
ing issues: indoor and outdoor privacy, solar access, build-
ing appearance, and overall project design appeal. Build-
ings should be oriented to create courtyards and open space
areas, thus increasing the aesthetic appeal of the site.
Building architecture should incorporate a variety of units,
building sizes and heights, and color accents. Building
facades should include relief to avoid a monotonous appear-
ance. Stairwells should be covered and integrated into the
overall building design, and private spaces such as patios
or balconies are encouraged for each unit. Another design
consideration is the need to buffer group parking areas from
the street and adjacent properties. A few of these design
concepts are illustrated below and on the following pages.
w 111~
, . .....
, .
....... ..
..... .......
." \ .........
W~. .f!II~ I!IJ~
~!VI'1'. y~y .se~
f"" /~
(10/26/90)
/l0i 71t/6
."
~'K~
VI; 6~,
.'
. ."
" .
~lJ(~
~7"D~r
MULTI-FAMILY SITE DESIGN
VI.12
3/-41'1
//'1 ~'ICt'- ~ ~a;/,g. ~ 7rJ:::t<. t/~ ~Ie
~ ~IV& ~ .11/t:rV4?P~ tI/'Il75 ~ ~
7IIfVEii? ~ (l~ IW .t.. Y,Pr'Verf 6f 1//tfS rb
?V~/tJ Ik- J1ll1071/1'1 If ~ m;<- ~a~.
&2
~~~tttt~tt
.. .
..........
.........
..........
...........
6b
I
. I
I
I
S
IN 11//"fjJ!'j1'Jf ~ Am.~Q IfPIISf;U9;-; /H~. ~
i' ~'" ~ a-vtr(~ tJlVh /a::;vTTTY :- ~
~. ~~~fft'~ ~$'~~ 7U'1J'G;"%-1 /6"9
tJP/lPI/'/& .R'IWS II 6e7'~7,!:: 1I,AS..5~. 71fIs WIIV /'f?6t'
~y~ VIo/VerY fb ~ 6~~e.
MUL Tt-FAMIL Y SITE DESIGN
VI-13
3t-1I1.5
Parcel R-1: This "parcel" consists of three in-fill areas
at the end of paseo Margarita, paseo Cresta, and along Paseo
Entrada. The most important design issue regarding ~his
parcel is the integration of new development with the exist-
ing homes on adjacent lots. The architectural design and
scale of the new homes should compliment the established
neighborhood character. Grading to create lots should also
blend with the contours of existing development. The street
interface of the several flag lots proposed at the end of
Paseo Margarita should also receive special attention.
Where lots back to Paseo Ladera, the rear fencing and street
landscaping should be consistent with community themes.
Parcel R-l
Design criteria Summary
Minimum Pad Size: 6,000 sf
.
&r'.i..;,.
-. -
~ ~ ...- \ vI"
. .
~--;
-' \ '":.--::-
--_\-.....~..~
,.-
r
Product: CONVENTIONAL SFD
Average Lot Size: 9,120 sf
Special Desiqn Issues
Grading: adjacent to Telegraph Canyon buffer, adjacent to Paseo
Ladera
Entry: Existing adjacent neighborhood
Fencing: Telegraph Canyon Road views; integration with existing
neighborhood fences
Edges: Telegraph Canyon Road, paseo Ladera; community facility
parcel (CF-1); existing neighborhood
Landscaping:
open space edges; community facility edge
(10/26/90)
VI-1S
31 - '11~
Parcel R-3: This parcel is located on the central plateau,
north of East "J" street and overlooks the south leg. of Rice
Canyon. It is planned for traditional single family detach-
ed products on conventional sized lots. The important
design areas in this parcel are the edges, one abutting the
canyon rim, one facing East "J" street, and two adjoining
existing development.
Most lots adjacent to the Villa Palmera project, at the
southwestern edge of the parcel, will have down slopes in
their rear yards creating a buffer to separate the two pro-
jects. Where a grade differential does not exist, adequate
fencing and landscaping will need to be provided. At the
western parcel boundary, SPA III homes will share a collec-
tor street with existing homes. The issue of complimentary
design and scale become important at this location. Along
the southern edge, additional lot depth is required for
those lots on East "J" Street because of the City's setback
standard for homes fronting on collector streets. The lot
pattern along the canyon rim has been designed to maximize
the view potential of these home sites. Repetitive roof
styles which would be noticeable from within or across the
canyon should be avoided. Landscaping on the adjacent
slopes should obscure these homes as viewed from the canyon
trail without blocking the views from the homes themselves.
Parcel R-3
Design Criteria Summary
Product: TRADITIONAL SFD
,"
>
Minimum Pad Size: 5,000 sf
Average Lot Size: 7,200 sf
,19', .---:~~~
~-----
Special Desiqn Issues
Grading: Canyon slopes; existing adjacent development
Entry: none
Fencing: Canyon views; compliment existing development
Edges: Canyon; existing development
Landscaping:
Canyon interface; existing development
(10/26/90)
VI-17
31-1./1:r-
Parcel R-5: This parcel is located in the middle of the
central ridge and lies between Parcel R-2 and East "J"
Street. All property adjacent to this parcel is within the
SPA III so coordination with existing development is not an
issue here. The primary design issue for this parcel is the
appearance of the project perimeter along East "J" Street
and Paseo Ranchero. A second issue is the alignment/spacing
of entries with those of the school, park and single-family
attached project across East "J" Street.
Parcel R-5
Design Criteria Snmm"ry
Product: SFD (Home size 1,550 - 2,000 sf)
Minimum Pad Size: 3,600 sf
'--~ c ,
~~~:'._-"'---~---
~ . .' ~
..:.-
10l ______ --,
~-~-~_.:-~~~-
Average Lot Size: 4,360 sf
Special Desiqn Issues
Grading: none
Entry: Spacing with entries to S-1/P-1 and R-6
Fencing: Perimeter fence along Paseo Ranchero and East "J"
Street
Edges: Paseo Ranchero and East "J" Street
Landscaping: Edge conditions
(10/26/90)
VI-19
j/-I.{I ~
Townhous
Concept Pla~
.. /
~
:
~
z:rrrnu
.
.
;,
.
.
..
~ tllJTT ~
~~~,
~ q,r:f .
~M!" .
.
GI(fl; .
~.:
h'Y~ .
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
~ ...
.
.
.
r-
VI~
p
.~9~QEL m
Del Rey Part
_ VI-21 nership
. 3/-'-//9
Cinti
. """""'"
'1119' 239 :!~;
Parcel R-6
Design Criteria Summary
Product: TOWNHOMES
Minimum Pad Size: N/A
,~'-
"r .1
Special Desiqn Issues
Grading: Park site interface; Telegraph Canyon edge
~"::'.:;;:"
..~. --'~' .
, -
.t= __ _,',
r ':>'I, .....---._ _ . /
L_~_,;--"",,~_~,'-~~
Average Lot Size: N/A
Entry: Alignment with adjacent entries
Fencing: Views to Telegraph Canyon Road; Park site separation
Edges: Telegraph Canyon; East "J" Street; Park site
Landscaping: Edge conditions
(10/26/90) VI-23
3 , -l/JO
Specialty Housing Concept Plan
Parcel R-7
:5
N
U1
W
-
,
~
tJ
-
,AWo<-
IIMJ&r "',.,..
W~.
:? OWFr 7l'8:1
~
tiN/'- twI"- ~
~""I1"""_
~_W>....
t>!i'-r~.
.~S1!9~Q~~~!?!!
Cinti
&"'~
110"",' '" 'HI~
...
a.
Q)
o
c:
o
()
to...
J!2
.....
:J
CO
Q)
a.
CO
o
en
"C
c:
CO
...J
If .
..."(~ -
~~ .
I ~J ~ ~
I 0., ",.CI
, --
I 00' ~
, w
i
,
i 00'
I 0
/ EJ
/ ~
i
/
/
i
/
i
.
i
I
.
\' /
i
I .1
I j
flu /
i!! i
I~ :
_Ji . / /
-ll r~;;/
.
VI-27 /
3/-q~~
\ \
__J ' ~~~
-l ~~
. M ~
\ j
I
__J
-I
SJ
si
@j
aJ
.
'-0
Q)O)
..... to-
.....2
~ctl
CDtf
+-' -
C1>~
~o..
+-'0)
00(,)
c:
J:o
U
+-'
en
ctS
W
..
~
~
~
It a .
~ .
tl
~
gDl
.\})..~
~
" Il~
VI-28 3/- 1./-:J.3
~J ;
~
il
gj
~ a
Sj
:.,.
...
~
-~
~
"t- @j
~~ a~
.
EAST H STREET
Expanded Parkway
1l!P'1i:
.tr<'_f____
.~~,.:I-.I:I
.~--
~-
'Iff!:!!:.
<D'
~
-.
..",......,.. of'... ~~
.tt:<<~":'-"f:,
.~.,.".~
IJ',"""""
~
,,~
..'
~
31- 4~ L/
mNOffiO DJft m VI-3D
rL!1'l 1Ih. Ci1ti
811 ~
'..'nf."'1
ITEM TITLE:
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item~
Meeting Date 6/18/91
Public Hearing: Consideration of establishment of industrial
wastewater discharge permit fees
Ordinance ~'1~" Adding Chapters 3.14 and 3.20, amending
Section 3.16.010, repealing Chapter 3.20, Title 13 and
Chapters 13.04 through 13.44 of Title 13, adding a new Title
13 and new Chapters 13.02 through 13.14 therein, adding a new
Titl e 14 and renumberi ng Chapters 13.48 through 13.68 to the
Chula Vista Municipal Code relating to sewers and watercourses
Resolution }("a6 Approving amending the Master Fee
Schedul e to make techni ca 1 reorgani zat i ona 1 changes and
establish new industrial wastewater discharge permit fees
Work~ r;r/
(4/5ths Vote: Yes~No___)
Director of Public
/'
Ci ty Managedl
EPA regulations mandate the inclusion of certain industrial waste and other
provi s i on 's in the City Code. A revi ew of vari ous code chapters re 1 at i ng to
wastewater and the design, construction, use, permitting and funding of
wastewater facilities showed the current code to be faulted in many respects.
Consequent ly it was determi ned that the code shoul d be revi sed not only to
accommodate EPA mandated revisions but so as to upgrade the remaining portions
of the code relating to sewage and public sewage facilities.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council:
1. Conduct the public hearing.
2. Place the Ordinance on first reading.
3. Adopt the resolution.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
1. Background
The Federal Government in adopting the Federal Water Pollution Control
Act mandates that sewage agencies:
A. Establish a pretreatment program for industries;
B. Monitor industrial wastes;
C. Establ i sh fees to recover the cost of admi ni steri ng the
industrial waste program;
D. Establ ish equitable charges for the treatment of sewage based on
the quantity and quality of waste generated; and
E. Pass enabling ordinances.
3~
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date 6/18/91
Because of the involvement of Federal grants the Metropolitan Sewage
System and all of its participating agencies, including Chula Vista,
became subject to the Water Pollution Control Act mandate.
The EPA, acting through the State Water Resources Control Board,
established a July 1, 1991 deadline for enactment of certain provisions
related to sewers and industrial wastes in the City Codes of the
various Metro agencies.
Staff undertook modification of the Chula Vista Code so as to conform
with the Federal requirement. Preliminary review of existing Code
provisions disclosed that such a modification would be, at best, a
band-a id approach. Current wastewater rel ated Code provi si ons are in
large measure inadequate, poorly organized, archaic and ambiguous.
Consequently, it was determi ned that the Ci ty woul d be best served
through the preparation of totally revised Code provisions relating to
wastewater and wastewater facilities.
Staff requested, and received, an extension of time so as to be able to
incorporate the mandated provi s ions into a total reorgani zat i on and
upgrade of all current sewer-related Code provisions. The Board
representative agreed to the need for extensive revision and
subsequently modified the deadl ine requirement to submi ssion of the
proposed Sewer Ordinance to City Council instead of enactment.
All Metro Sewerage System part i ci pants are subject to the same bas i c
requirement and deadl ine. The "incentive" provided by EPA includes the
threatened withdrawal of $19,000,000 in grants previously provided to
the Metro System.
The proposed ordi nance was prepared with the fo 11 owi ng objectives in
mind:
A. compl iance with the Federal Water Pollution Control Act and the
Federal Clean Water Act.
B. Elimination of ambiguous terms and phrases.
C. Standardization of terminology.
D. Consolidation and organization of wastewater related provlslons.
E. Purgi ng of wastewater hcil i ty construction specifi cat ions and
details from the Code.
F. Clarification of responsibilities.
G. Clarification and reinforcement of enforcement provlslons.
H. Expansi on of app 1 i cabil ity of plan revi ew, permit and inspect ion
activities to all public wastewater facilities and private
pretreatment facilities.
I. Establishment of a new Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit and
Fees.
~.2
Page 3, Item
Meeting Date 6/18/91
2. Discussion of Modifications and Additions Made.
A. Industrial Wastewater Provisions
The current code includes some very basic and inadequate
provisions relating to industrial wastes. The proposed ordinance
will create a viable system of permits, fees, management,
reports, pretreatment and enforcement which is both in conformity
with Federa ljState regul at ions, and compat i bl e with Metro System
practices.
The City of San Diego Industrial Waste Program staff has for many
years performed most of the work i nvol ved in i ndustri al waste
permit issuance and compliance for the City of Chula Vista. This
practice has resulted from the fact that San Diego has the
personnel, technical expertise, equipment and laboratory
facil it i es to accompl i sh the task. Chula Vi sta' s costs for such
services have been paid from the Sewer Service Revenue Fund. It
is probable that Chula Vista will continue to utilize San Diego's
staff for these purposes rather than contracting with a private
1 aboratory or creating its own staff and facil it i es. Whatever
course of action is chosen it is necessary that the costs
associ ated wi th Industri a 1 Wastewater Di scharge Permi t issuance
and compliance be assessed primarily against the generators of
i ndustri a 1 wastewater. The proposed ordi nance establ i shes these
fees and formalizes the process and conditions of permit issuance.
The Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit fee to be paid by
industrial dischargers will reflect both the volume and type of
discharge (permit category) involved. The ordinance defines
three permi t categori es to whi ch all i ndustri a 1 di schargers wi 11
be assigned. Following is a copy of the fee schedule proposed:
Flow (Average Daily
Industrial Wastewater
Flow in Gallons oer Dav
Permit Fee (Annual)
Permit Category
1 Z ~
More than 100,000
50,001 to 100,000
25,001 to 50,000
10,001 to 25,000
100 to 10,000
Less than 100
$2,000
1,500
1,250
650
500
25
$1 ,200
1,000
600
500
275
25
$1,000
600
500
300
200
25
Some industrial wastewater discharges are of such strength or
character as to be unacceptable without pretreatment. The ordinance
authori zes the Di rector of Publ i c Works to requi re construct i on of
facil ities to pretreat such wastewater prior to discharge to the
public sewer.
~-3
Page 4, Item
Meeting Date 6/18/91
Food establishments have in the past proven to be a major source of
grease which has a deleterious effect on the publ ic sewer system.
This ordinance imposes a requirement that grease traps be installed
at food establishments.
The proposed ordinance incorporates an enumeration of prohibited
di scharges whi ch is s i gni fi cantly more detail ed and comprehensi ve
than that i ncl uded in the current Ci ty Code. The new 1 i st i ng is
additionally in conformity with Metro System prohibitions.
B. General Modifications
1. The current code include definitions scattered in several of
the pertinent chapters. Terminology used in the text is
sometimes not consistent with the definitions provided and
sometimes not consistent with modern usage.
The proposed ordinance includes a single modernized list of
definitions and utilizes those definitions in a consistent
manner.
2. The current code i ncl udes extens i ve and archaic sewer
construction specifications and design criteria. Such details
are most appropriately included in the various specifications,
standard drawings and manual s adopted by the City to govern
public works design and construction or are provide for in the
Uniform Plumbing and Building Codes which are applicable in
Chula Vi sta. The proposed ordi nance has been purged of all
such details and simply includes formal reference to those
documents where such details are available.
3. The current code sometimes assigns responsibility and authority
to the City Clerk, City Manager, City Finance Director, City
Engineer and/or the Director of Publ ic Works. In some
instances the delegation of responsibility and authority is not
clearly defined. The proposed ordinance is substantially more
specific in delegating tasks to the City Manager, Director of
Finance, and the Director of Public Works.
4. Current code enforcement provisions relating to wastewater
and/or wastewater facil ities are scattered and confusing, or
simply absent. The proposed ordinance consolidates
administrative enforcement, including notice, hearing and
appeal procedures, and judicial enforcement into a single
chapter in such manner as to more clearly define their
appl icabil ity, and provide appropriate "due process".
5. The current City Code sewer permit provi s ions are generally
applicable to only the construction of sewer laterals and
connections. The proposed ordinance clarifies and expands that
permit authority to cover all wastewater facil ity construction
within the public right-of-way.
3k-1
Page 5, Item
Meeting Date 6/18/91
6. The total package of provisions relating to wastewater and
wastewater facilities has been reorganized in the proposed
ordinance. All matters pertaining to sewer related funds and
permitted uses for those funds will be found in Title 3. All
matters, other than funds, relating to wastewater and
wastewater facil ities will be found in new Title 13, entitled
IISewers."
Proposed Title 13 contains seven chapters:
13.02
13.04
13.06
13.08
13.10
13.12
13.14
Purpose, Scope and Policy
Defi nit ions
General Provisions
Permits, Plans, Construction, Inspection, and Use
of Wastewater Facilities
Industrial Wastewater
Unlawful Discharges to the Wastewater System
Fees
The organi zat i on and content of the proposed ordi nance is
generally similar to and compatible with the City of San
Di ego ordi nance in regard to i ndustri a 1 wastewater matters
in order to facilitate coordination of industrial
wastewater di scharge permit issuance and enforcement. The
imposition of new fees in Chapter 13.10 requires their
consideration in a public hearing.
7. Existing Chapter 13.04 relating to fire hydrants is
repealed because its provisions are obsolete, being covered
by the Uniform Fire Code. A new Title 14 is created and
the existing chapters in Title 13 relating to Watercourses
(including Storm Drains) are move to that new Title.
FISCAL IMPACT: The City was billed a total of $22,741.99 by the City of San
Diego for Industrial Waste Program services in Fiscal Year 89-90. Those
charges are expected to increase significantly in the near term. In the past
such costs have been paid from the Sewer Servi ce Revenue Fund and not the
i ndi vidua 1 permittee. Impos it i on of i ndustri a 1 wastewater permi t fees and
enforcement charges as set forth in the proposed ordi nance wi 11 generate
additional income to offset those charges by the City of San Diego. Further,
these fees and charges wi 11 more equitably di stri bute the costs associ ated
with industrial wastewater generation.
WPC 5644E
~-5
SECTION III. That section 3.16.010 of the Chula vista Municipal
Code is amended to read:
Section 3.16.010 DiapasitiaR af maReys ESTABLISHMENT OF
SEWER INCOME FUND - USES
All revenue derived from Public Sewer Connection Fees under
sections 13.14.03013.1g.179 through 13.14.08013.1g.299 shall be
deposited into the fund designated as the "Sewer Income Fund" and
which may be used only for the acquisition, construction,
reconstruction, maintenance and operation of sanitation or
sewerage facilities; except that such fund may be used, in the
discretion of the City Council, for, pursuant to a written
contract, the reimbursement of subdividers as reauireda~thsriBea
by sections 66486115'3 and 66487115" of the GovernmentB~siReas
aRa PrafeasisRs Code af the atate or, pursuant to a written
contract, to reimburse any person who has constructed sewer
facilities, to the extent, as determined by the City Council,
that such sewer facilities have benefited other properties, or to
reimburse the City for any expenses incurred in connection with
the construction and installation of any sewer facility,
including but not limited to the cost of engineering work and all
costs in connection with the acquisition of rights-of-way.
SECTION IV. That Chapter 3.20 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code
is repealed and a new Chapter 3.20 entitled "Sewer Service
Revenue Fund" is added.
SECTION V. That former Section 3.20.010 of the Chula vista
Municipal Code is amended to read:
section 3.20.010 Ea~aeli6hea DiDposi~ieR af reveR~e
E)[peRdit~reB permitted ESTABLISHMENT OF SEWER SERVICE REVENUE
FUND - USES.
A. There is established a fund designated as the "Sewer
Service Revenue Fund".
B. Except for the amounts deposited in the Seweraae
Facilities Replacement Fund pursuant to section 3.18.010 aAII
revenue derived from sewer service charges set forth in ~
ehapter section 13.14.110 shall be deposited into such Sewer
Service Revenue Fund.
C. Nothing herein shall be construed as superseding or
conflicting with the existing ~sewer I~income E~und.
D. The fund shall be used solely for the following
purposes unless the City Council shall by four-fifths vote
appropriate such funds for another purpose provided such purpose
shall be for the construction, maintenance or operation of sewers
or incidental thereto, including any charge for its collection:
j.{-7
6/7/91 -- 2 -- Final
1. paying the cost of maintenance and operation of
the sewer system of the City;
2. Paying all or any part of the cost and expense of
extending, constructing, reconstructing or
improving the sewer system of the City or any part
thereof;
3. Reimbursing persons who have constructed sewer
facilities and who have entered into a
reimbursement agreement with the City;
4. Paying for the San Diego metropolitan sewer annual
capacity charge;
5. Paying for the San Diego metropolitan sewer annual
maintenance and operation charge and periodic
industrial waste program charges.
6. Any purpose authorized for Sewer Income Fund
utilization el!eellt maifrte.Raflee alia e~erat.iefl
pl::lrpeseo.
SECTION VI. That Title 13 and Chapters 13.04, 13.08, 13.12,
13.14, 13.16, 13.20, 13.24, 13.28, 13.32, 13.40, and 13.44 of the
Chula vista Municipal Code are repealed.
SECTION VII. That a new Title 13 entitled "SEWERS" is added to
the Chula vista Municipal Code to read as follows:
TITLE 13 SEWERS
CHAPTER 13.02
PURPOSE, SCOPE AND POLICY
section 13.02.010
PURPOSE
The purpose of this Title is to provide for the maximum
beneficial public use of the City'S Wastewater System or
Facilities through adequate regulation of sewer construction,
sewer use and industrial wastewater discharge, to provide for
equitable distribution of the City'S costs, and to provide
procedures for complying with wastewater discharge requirements
placed upon the City through interagency agreement or by other
State or Federal regulatory bodies.
section 13.02.020
SCOPE
31.-~
6/7/91 -- 3 -- Final
This Title shall be interpreted in accordance with the
definitions set forth herein and the provisions of this ordinance
shall apply to the direct or indirect discharge of all waste into
the City's wastewater system.
This Title, among other things, provides for the regulation
of sewer construction in areas within the city's boundaries, the
quantity and quality of discharged wastes, the degree of waste
pretreatment required, the setting of waste discharge fees to
provide for equitable distribution of costs, the approval of
plans for sewer construction, the issuance of Permits for
Industrial Wastewater Discharge and of other miscellaneous
permits, and the establishment of penalties for violation of this
Title.
section 13.02.030
LIQUID WASTE DISPOSAL POLICY
The City builds and operates and/or contracts for public
sewers and wastewater facilities collectively known as the City's
wastewater system, which serves homes, industries and commercial
establishments. The following policies apply to wastewater
discharges within the City's boundaries and to other discharges
that are tributary to the City's wastewater facilities.
Generally, wastewater originating within the City's
boundaries will be removed by the City's wastewater system unless
the wastewater will (1) damage structures, (2) create nuisances
(such as odors, etc.), (3) endanger public health, (4) impose
unreasonable collection, treatment or disposal costs on the City,
(5) interfere with wastewater treatment processes, (6) fail to
meet quality requirements set by regulatory government agencies
or interagency agreements, or (7) detrimentally affect the local
environment.
The City in its General Plan adopted in July 1989, has
endorsed the concept of wastewater renovation and reuse in order
to conserve water to provide an alternate source of water supply
and to reduce the overall costs of wastewater treatment and
disposal. The renovation of wastewater through secondary and/or
tertiary wastewater treatment processes will necessitate the
imposition of stringent quality requirements on industrial
wastewater discharges.
To comply with the Federal Water Pollution Control Act and the
Federal Clean Water Act and to permit the City to meet
increasingly higher standards, provisions are made in this Title
for the regulation of industrial wastewater discharges. This
Title establishes quantity and quality limitations on industrial
wastewater discharges. provisions are also made for cost
recovery from industrial wastewater dischargers where the
discharges impose inequitable collection, treatment or disposal
costs on the City.
3"- - r
6/7/91 -- 4 -- Final
The city does prefer and encourage industrial wastewater
dischargers to reach beyond simple compliance with limitations
set upon their discharges, and to incorporate recovery and reuse
provisions into their procedures to the maximum extent feasible.
Optimum use of the city's wastewater facilities may require that
certain industrial wastewaters be discharged during periods of
low flow in the city's wastewater system.
CHAPTER 13.04
DEFINITIONS
section 13.04.010
DEFINITIONS
Unless otherwise defined herein, terms relating to water and
wastewater shall be as adopted in the latest edition of Standard
Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater. published by
the American Public Health Association, the American Water Works
Association and the Water Pollution control Federation.
The meaning of other various terms as used in this ordinance
shall be as follows:
A. "Agent" shall mean any person duly authorized by the
city to perform specific work upon sewerage facilities
under permit or under contract.
B. "Applicant" shall mean a person, partnership, entity,
firm, association, corporation, or public agency
applying for connection to a public sewer, approval of
plans to construct or to modify wastewater facilities,
or for a Permit for Industrial Wastewater Discharge.
c. "Building" shall mean a structure containing one or
more fixtures and separated from any other structure.
D. "Building Sewer" shall mean a privately maintained
sewer .which extends across private property from a
building to a sewer lateral, public sewer, or private
sewer.
E. "City Manager" shall mean the City Manager of the city
of Chula Vista.
-F. "Director" shall mean the Director of Public Works or
designee.
G. "DisCharger" shall mean any person who discharges or
causes a discharge of wastewater directly or indirectly
into the City's Wastewater System or Facilities.
"3.t.. -10
6/7/91 -- 5 -- Final
H. "Domestic Wastewater" shall mean the liquid and
waterborne wastes derived from the ordinary living
processes in a dwelling unit, said wastes being of such
character as to permit satisfactory disposal, without
special treatment, into a public sewer.
H. "Fixture" shall mean any plumbing or wastewater outlet
requiring a trap or vent.
I. "Food Establishment" shall mean a food establishment as
defined in Health and Safety Code section 27520, as it
may be amended from time to time.
J. "Grease Pretreatment Device" shall mean a device
conforming to the Uniform Plumbing Code requirements
for grease interceptors and/or grease traps approved by
the Director and the Director of Building and Housing
and designed to remove grease from wastewater before it
enters the Building Sewer.
K. "Industrial Wastewater" shall mean all wastewater,
including all wastewater from any producing,
manufacturing, processing, institutional, commercial,
service, agricultural, or other operation, including
food establishments, which are required to be
controlled by Federal, State of California or local
regulations or which interfere with the operation and
maintenance of the Wastewater System or Facilities.
These exclude domestic wastewater, but may also include
wastes of human origin similar to domestic wastewater.
L. "Mass Emission Rate" shall mean the weight of a
specific material discharged to the public sewer during
a given time interval.
M. "Parcel" shall mean a piece of land as described or
shown upon current records of the County Recorder of
San Diego county.
N. "Person" shall mean any individual, partnership,
entity, firm, association, corporation or public agency
including the State of California and the United States
of America.
o. "Public Sewer" shall mean a sewer owned and operated by
the City which is tributary to treatment or reclamation
facilities operated or utilized by the city of Chula
vista.
P. "Private Sewer" shall mean a privately maintained sewer
constructed from its connection with a public sewer
across public and/or private property to provide sewer
service to two or more individual parcels of record,
3.1. -1/
6/7/91 -- 6 -- Final
and for which a written agreement pursuant to section
13.08.090 has been filed with the Director.
Q. "Sewage" shall have the same meaning as "Wastewater".
R. "Sewer Connection" shall mean the'physical facilities
involved and/or the act of construction of a viable
juncture between a building sewer or private sewer, and
sewer lateral or the public sewer system.
S. "Sewer Lateral" shall mean a four or six inch diameter
privately maintained sewer constructed from its
connection with a public sewer across public property
to the boundary of such public property so as to
provide sewer service to buildings or structures
situated upon an individual parcel of record.
T. "Sewer Service" shall mean the service and benefits
derived through utilization of the public sewer system.
U. "Standard Methods" shall mean procedures described in
the current edition of Standard Methods for the
Examination of Water and Wastewater. as published by
the American Public Health Association, the American
Water Works Association and the Water Pollution Control
Federation.
V. "Suspended Solids" shall mean any insoluble material
contained as a component of wastewater and capable of
separation from the liquid portion of said wastewater
by laboratory filtration as determined by the
appropriate testing procedure and Standard Methods.
W. "Treatment Facilities" shall mean facilities owned or
utilized by the City in the treatment of wastewater or
for the reclamation of wastewater.
X. "Waste" shall mean any and all waste substances,
liquid, solid, gaseous, or radioactive, associated with
human habitation, or of human or animal origin, or from
any producing, manufacturing, processing,
institutional, commercial, service, agricultural, food
preparation or other operation.
Y. "Wastewater" shall mean waste and water, whether
treated or untreated, discharged directly or indirectly
into or permitted to enter a public sewer. "Wastewater"
includes both Domestic and Industrial wastewater.
Z. "Wastewater Constituents and Characteristics" shall
mean the individual chemical, physical, bacteriological
or radiological parameters, including volume, flow
rate and such other parameters that define, classify or
measure the quality and quantity of wastewater.
3:1.. -)~
6/7/91 -- 7 -- Final
AA. "Wastewater system or Facilities" shall mean any and
all public facilities used by the City for collecting,
conveying, pumping, treating, disposing and reclaiming
wastewater.
CHAPTER 13.06
GENERAL PROVISIONS
section 13.06.010
ADMINISTRATION
The Director of Public Works (Director) shall administer,
implement and enforce the provisions of this Title. Any powers
granted to or duties imposed upon the Director may be delegated
by the Director to persons in the employ of the City, or pursuant
to contract.
The Director shall make and enforce regulations necessary to
the administration of this ordinance and may recommend that the
Council amend such regulations from time to time as conditions
require. These regulations shall be consistent with the general
policy established herein by the City Council and shall be
subject to prior review and approval by the city Council.
section 13.06.020
TIME LIMITS
Any time limit provided in any written notice or in any
provision of this Title may be extended only by a written
directive of the Director.
section 13.06.030
INSPECTION AND SAMPLING, GENERAL
A. The Director may cause inspection and sampling of every
facility involved directly or indirectly with the discharge of
wastewater to the city's wastewater system as deemed necessary.
These facilities shall include, but not be limited to, sewer
laterals, sewer connections, private sewers, public sewers,
wastewater pumping stations, pollution control plants, all
industrial processes, food establishment facilities or other
facilities which may discharge grease and oil at levels which
cause blockages to the sewer, industrial wastewater generation,
facilities, conveyance and pretreatment facilities, and all
similar wastewater facilities. Inspections may be made to
determine that such facilities are constructed, maintained and
operated properly and are adequate to meet the provisions of this
chapter.
B. Owners, users and operators of all facilities directly
or indirectly connected to the City's wastewater system, whether
under construction or completed shall give access to authorized
personnel or representatives of the City at all reasonable times
including those occasioned by emergency conditions. Any
s~-13
6/7/91 -- 8 -- Final
permanent or temporary obstruction to easy access to the
wastewater facility to be inspected shall promptly be removed by
the facility, owner, user or operator at the written or verbal
request of the Director and shall not be replaced.
No person shall interfere with, delay, resist or refuse
entrance to an authorized City inspector attempting to inspect
any wastewater generation, conveyance or treatment facility
connected directly or indirectly to the city's wastewater system,
and the provisions of Chapter 1.16 of this Code shall not apply.
C. The City, through its representatives or inspectors,
shall have the right to inspect and copy pertinent records
relating to a permittee's wastewater discharge or pretreatment
operations including inventories, chemical usage, materials,
sources, hazardous materials manifests and disposal records,
treatment and operations log books and materials invoices.
D. The Director shall provide adequate identification for
all inspectors and other authorized personnel, and those persons
shall identify themselves when entering any property for
inspection purposes or when inspecting the work of any
contractor.
section 13.06.040
RECORDING OF RECEIPT OF MONIES
The Director shall keep a permanent and accurate account of
all fees, costs, charges, and civil penalties received under this
Title, giving the names and addresses of the persons on whose
account such monies were paid, the date and amount thereof and
the purpose for which paid.
section 13.06.050
ESTIMATED QUANTITIES AND VALUES
Unless otherwise provided herein, whenever the fees and
charges required by this Title are based on estimated values or
estimated quantities, the Director shall make such determinations
in accordance with established estimating practices.
section 13.06.060
INTERFERENCE WITH CITY'S WASTEWATER SYSTEM OR
FACILITIES
It is unlawful for any person to willfully enter, break,
destroy, uncover, open, restrict flow, bury, deface or tamper
with any sewer or any structure, equipment or appurtenance which
is part of the city's Wastewater System or Facilities.
section 13.06.070
FALSIFYING INFORMATION
It is unlawful for any person to knowingly make any false
statement, representation, record, report, plan or other document
filed with the Director or to falsify, tamper with or knowingly
render inaccurate any monitoring device or method required under
this Title.
3;. -'If
6/7/91 -- 9 -- Final
section 13.06.080
DISCHARGE AS A PUBLIC NUISANCE
Discharge of wastewater in any manner in violation of this
Title or in violation of any order issued by the Director as
authorized by this Title, is hereby declared unlawful and a
public nuisance and shall be corrected or abated as directed by
the Director.
section 13.06.090
COSTS OF DAMAGE OR CLEANUP
Any person who violates any of the provisions of this Title
or who otherwise causes a deposit, obstruction, damage or any
other impairment to the City's wastewater system or facilities is
liable to the city for all damages, losses or expenses of cleanup
or repair occasioned the City by reason of such violation or
discharge. Additionally, this Title is intended to create a
private cause of action in any person, suffering damages, losses
or expenses as a result of such violation.
section 13.06.100
ADMINISTRATIVE ENFORCEMENT
A. Termination of Service
When deemed necessary for the preservation of public
health or safety or for the protection of public or private
property, the Director may notify any person or persons using the
wastewater system in a manner or way to endanger the public
health or safety, or public or private property, in writing of
intention to suspend sewer service. In case of emergency, the
Director may act immediately to suspend sewer service without
notice or warning to said person or persons. In suspending
service the Director may sever all pertinent connections to the
public sewer.
If service is so suspended, the Director shall keep an
account of the cost of suspension and remedy of the emergency
situation, and bill the property owner and/or other person
responsible therefor. The Director shall give the affected
person(s) notice of and opportunity for hearing on the need for
and the cost of emergency action as soon as practicable after
taking such action.
B. Revocation of Permit
The Director may revoke any Industrial Wastewater
Discharge Permit and terminate if a violation of any provision of
this. Title is found to exist or if a discharge of wastewater
causes or threatens to cause a condition of contamination,
pollution or nuisance. Such revocation shall be carried out
pursuant to Section 13.06.110. This provision is cumulative of
other statutes or rules authorizing termination of service for
delinquency in payment and other civil, criminal or
administrative enforcement actions provided for in this Title.
3~~
6/7/91 -- 10 -- Final
C. civil Penalties
Any person who violates any prov~s~on of this Title or
permit condition or who discharges wastewater which adversely
affects the wastewater system or facilities, or who violates any
cease and desist order or prohibition issued by the Director, or
national pretreatment standard shall be liable civilly for a
penalty not to exceed $1,000 for each day in which such violation
occurs, not to exceed $100,000 in total. Imposition of such civil
penalties shall be pursuant to the procedures set forth in
section 13.06.110.
D. Recalculation of Sewer Service Charges
1. When the Director determines that the permittee
is discharging a flow rate, or a quantity of flow, chemical
oxygen demand, suspended solids or other constituent in excess of
that authorized by the permit or in excess of the quantities
reported to the Director by the permittee, the Director shall
recalculate the sewer service charge. The Director may further
institute proceedings to revoke the permit, or upon application
may issue an amended permit.
2. The data obtained in samplings or any other
relevant information obtained by the Director or presented by the
permittee, shall be used by the Director as the quantity
parameters used to determined a correct sewer service charge.
When the Director makes a determination pursuant to subdivision D
l,above, in the absence of other evidence, the Director shall
presume that the permittee/discharger was discharging at the
determined parameter values over the preceding three (3) years or
since the Director's previous verification of quantity
parameters, whichever period is shorter.
The permittee shall be assessed for all delinquent
sewer service charges together with penalty and interest. Before
these charges shall be assessed, at least two additional 24-hour
samples and flow measurements shall be obtained by the Director,
with all costs of sampling and analyses to be paid by the
permittee. Imposition of said delinquent charges, penalties and
interest shall be pursuant to the procedures set forth in section
13.06.110.
Section 13.06.110
PROCEDURES
ADMINISTRATIVE NOTICE, HEARING AND APPEAL
-A. Unless otherwise provided herein, any notice required
to be given by the Director under this Title shall be in writing
and served in person or by registered or certified mail. If
served by mail, the notice shall be sent to the last address
known to the Director. Where the address is unknown, service may
be made upon the owner of record of the property involved. Such
notice shall be deemed to have been given at the time of deposit,
postage prepaid, in a facility regularly serviced by the United
3~ -/ /p
6/7/91 -- 11 -- Final
states Postal Service whether or not the registered or certified
mail is accepted.
B. Except for emergency suspension of sewer service (as
provided in Section 13.06.100 A), when the Director determines
that a violation of one or more provisions of this Title exists
or has occurred any violator(s) or property owner(s) of record
may be served by the Director with a written Notice and Order.
The Notice and Order shall state the Municipal Code Section
violated, describe how violated, the location and date(s) of the
violation(s), and describe the corrective action required. The
Notice and Order shall require immediate corrective action by the
violator(s) or property owner(s) and explain which methodes) of
administrative enforcement are being utilized by the Director:
suspension of sewer service; revocation of permit; civil
penalties; and/or recalculation of sewer service charges. The
Notice and Order shall also explain the consequences of failure
to comply, including that civil penalties begin to immediately
accrue if compliance is not achieved within ten (10) days from
the date the Notice and Order is issued. The Notice and Order
shall identify all hearing rights. The Director may propose any
enforcement action reasonably necessary to abate the violation.
C. If the violation(s) is not corrected within ten (10)
days from the date the Notice and Order is issued, the Director
shall request the city Manager to appoint a Hearing Officer and
fix a date, time, and place for hearing. The Director shall give
written notice thereof to the violator(s) or owner(s) of record,
at least ten (10) days prior to the date for hearing.
1. The Hearing Officer shall consider any written or
oral evidence presented to determine whether the violation(s)
exists, service should be terminated, the permit should be
revoked, suspended, or modified, civil penalties should be
imposed, and/or sewer service charges should be imposed,
consistent with rules and procedures for the conduct of hearings
and rendering of decisions established and promulgated by the
City Manager.
2. In determining whether action regarding a permit
should be taken, or the amount of a civil penalty to be imposed,
the Hearing Officer may consider any of the following factors:
a. Duration of the violation(s)
b. Frequency or recurrence
c. Seriousness
d. History
e. Violator's conduct after issuance of the Notice
and Order
~~
6/7/91 -- 12 -- Final
f. Good faith effort to comply
g. Economic impact of the penalty on the
violator(s)
h. Impact of the violation on the community
i. Any other factor which justice may require.
3. If the violator(s) or owner(s) of record fail to
attend the hearing, it shall constitute a waiver of the right to
a hearing and adjudication of all or any portion of the Notice
and Order.
4. The Hearing Officer shall render a written decision
within ten(IO) days of the close of the hearing, including
findings of fact and conclusions of law, identifying the time
frame involved and the factors considered in assessing civil
penalties, if any, or recalculation of sewer service charges, as
appropriate. The decision shall be effective immediately unless
otherwise stated in the decision. The Hearing Officer shall
cause the decision to be served on the Director and all
participating violators or owners of record.
5. If the persons assessed recalculated sewer service
charges or civil penalties fail to pay them within the time
specified in the Hearing Officer's decision, the unpaid amount
constitutes either a personal obligation of the person assessed
or a lien upon the real property on which the violation occurred,
in the discretion of the Director. If the violation(s) is not
corrected as directed the recalculation/civil penalty continues
to accrue on a daily basis. civil penalties may not exceed
$100,000 in the aggregate. When the violation is subsequently
corrected, the Director shall notify the violator(s) and/or
owner(s) of record of the outstanding recalculated sewer service
charges and/civil penalties, and provide an opportunity for
hearing if the amount(s) is disputed within ten (10) days from
such notice.
6. The Director shall take all appropriate legal steps
to collect these obligations, including referral to the City
Attorney for commencement of a civil action to recover said
funds. If collected as a lien, the Director shall cause a notice
of lien to be filed with the County Recorder, inform the County
Auditor and County Recorder of the amount of the obligation, a
description of the real property upon which the lien is to be
recovered, and the name of the agency to which the obligation is
to be paid. Upon payment in full, the Director shall file a
release of lien with the County Recorder.
section 13.06.120
JUDICIAL ENFORCEMENT
A. Criminal Penalties
30t -I t{
6/7/91 -- 13 -- Final
Notwithstanding Section 1.20.010, any person who
violates any provision of this Title or permit condition or who
discharges wastewater which adversely affects the wastewater
system or facilities or who violates any cease and desist order,
prohibition or national pretreatment standard shall be punished,
upon conviction, by a fine of not to exceed $10,000 for each day
in which such violation occurs, or for imprisonment in the County
Jail for not more than one {ll year or both.
B. Injunction/Abatement of Public Nuisance
Whenever a discharge of wastewater is in violation of
the provisions of this Title or otherwise causes or threatens to
cause a condition of contamination, pollution or nuisance, the
Director may also cause the City to seek a petition to the
Superior Court for the issuance of a preliminary or permanent
injunction or both, or an action to abate a public nuisance, as
may be appropriate in restraining the continuances of such
discharge.
C. other civil Action
Whenever a Notice and Order or Hearing Officer's
decision is not complied with, the City Attorney may, at the
request of the Director, initiate any appropriate civil action in
a court of competent jurisdiction to enforce such Notice and
Order or decision, including the recovery of any unpaid sewer
service charges or civil penalties provided for therein.
3).-1';
6/7/91 -- 14 -- Final
CHAPTER 13.08
PERMITS, PLANS, CONSTRUCTION, INSPECTION AND
USE OF WASTEWATER FACILITIES
Section 13.08.010
DIRECTOR - DUTIES
The Director shall issue permits, review plans, inspect and
make permanent record of:
A. All wastewater facility construction, repairs, sewer
connections and disconnections within public right-of-way.
B. All industrial wastewater pretreatment facility
construction and repairs upon private property.
Section 13.08.020
CONNECTIONS TO PUBLIC SEWERS - WASTEWATER
FACILITY CONSTRUCTION - PLANS AND PERMITS
REQUIRED
A. No person, other than employees of the City, shall
construct, connect or disconnect any public or private wastewater
facilities within the public right-of-way without first obtaining
approval of plans and a permit from the Director, unless such
work is performed under written contract or agreement with the
city. A permit shall not be assignable or transferable and shall
become void after sixty (60) days if work for which the permit is
issued has not commenced.
B. Application for permit must be made in writing to the
Director by the owner of the property to be sewered, or
authorized agent. The application shall be of such form and
content as required and provided by the Director.
C. The applicant shall submit to the City for approval,
construction plans and such specifications and other details as
required to describe fully the proposed wastewater facility. The
plans shall have been prepared under the supervision of and shall
be signed by an engineer of suitable training registered in the
State of California.
Section 13.08.030
CONFORMITY OF PLANS FOR WASTEWATER FACILITIES
TO CITY STANDARDS
Construction plans, specifications and details as necessary
to fully describe a proposed wastewater facility or wastewater
facility modification shall be in full conformity with the
following documents as adopted, and amended from time to time, by
the Chula vista City Council:
A. "Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction"
published by BNi Books
3.1-120
6/7/91 -- 15 -- Final
B. "Design standards - 1990 - Construction standards" by
Chu1a vista Department of Public Works
C. "City of Chula Vista Subdivision Manual"
D. "San Diego Area Regional Standard Drawings" by San
Diego County Department of Public Works
Copies of all such documents shall be available at the
Office of the Director.
section 13.08.040
INSPECTION, BACKFILLING AND TESTING OF
WASTEWATER FACILITIES
A. All construction or modification of wastewater
facilities, whether under permit, agreement with the City or city
contract, shall be inspected by City forces during construction
so as to assure full compliance with approved plans,
specifications and details in addition to adopted City standards
as referenced in section 13.08.030.
B. No person other than duly authorized employees of the
City shall backfill any trench or excavation made for the purpose
of constructing a wastewater facility until the pipe or structure
therein shall have been inspected by the Director and written
approval has been given in such form as may be determined by the
Director. The entire length of pipe shall be fully exposed for
inspection. At least twenty-four (24) hour notice shall be
provided in advance of such sewer inspection.
C. The Director may employ such tests as deemed necessary
in testing sewers and other wastewater facilities. The
Contractor shall furnish all tools, labor and assistance
necessary for such tests.
section 13.08.050
SEWER SERVICE REQUIRED
All buildings which contain any plumbing fixtures and for
which, in the opinion of the Director, service via the public
sewer system is reasonably feasible, must be connected to the
public sewer system.
section 13.08.060
SEWER CONNECTIONS AND SEWER LATERALS - WORK
TO BE DONE BY CITY
All sewer connections and all sewer lateral installations
within public right-of-way shall be done by the city or its
authorized agents.
section 13.08.070
LIMITATIONS ON POINT OF DISCHARGE
No person shall discharge any substance(s) directly into a
manhole or other opening in a public sewer other than through an
approved sewer connection.
3.2 -8./
6/7/91 -- 16 -- Final
section 13.08.080
LOCATION OF SEWER CONNECTION - AUTHORITY OF
DIRECTOR TO DESIGNATE
The Director shall have the authority to designate the
public sewer to which any building shall be connected,
considering all engineering factors and all outstanding financial
obligations, and the owner of any building may be required to
install pumps or ejectors to discharge part of or all sewage into
the public sewer designated by the Director.
Section 13.08.090
SEPARATE SEWER LATERAL REQUIRED AND ALLOWABLE
DEVIATIONS
Every building or parcel in need of sewer service shall be
served by a separate and individual sewer lateral. Deviations
from this requirement may be granted by the Director after plans
have been submitted to and approved by the Building and Housing
Department and the Public Worked Department Engineering Division
and it has been determined that the deviation will provide a
practical sewage disposal system and will not impose a financial
burden upon the City or relieve the property owner(s) from any
financial obligation in connection with the cost of public sewer
or other sewerage facilities designed to provide sewer service to
the subject building(s) or parcel(s). The Director may authorize
use of the same sewer lateral in any of the following
circumstances of deviation:
A. Where more than one building is situated upon the same
parcel, all of which are owned by the same person, and said
parcel may not legally be split or subdivided, or said owner
agrees in a written instrument suitable for recordation that all
of said parcel will be held under the same ownership as long as
independent sewer laterals are not provided;
B. Where public school districts, governmental agencies or
large commercial or industrial installations are involved;
C. Where two or more parcels are involved; provided that a
written agreement concerning use of the lateral and requiring
private responsibility for the future costs of maintenance and
repair of the lateral has been filed with the Director, fully
executed and in a form suitable for recordation.
Section 13.08.100
REUSE OF OLD SEWER LATERALS
-No new building or other structure shall be provided sewer
service via a previously used sewer lateral within public right-
of-way unless such used lateral has been inspected and approved
in writing by the Director.
~-~
6/7/91 -- 17 -- Final
section 13.08.110
OCCUPANCY OF PREMISES WITH UNAPPROVED SEWER
LATERAL
It is unlawful for any person to use or occupy any building
until the sewer lateral and building sewer serving such building
has been inspected and approved by the Director and the Director
of Building and Housing, or their duly authorized
representatives, and a Certificate of Occupancy or final
inspection approval has been issued.
?~-~
6/7/91 -- 18 -- Final
CHAPTER 13.10
INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER
section 13.10.010
REQUIRED
INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER DISCHARGE - PERMIT
No person shall discharge industrial wastewater into the
Wastewater System or Facilities without a permit (Permit for
Industrial Wastewater Discharge) issued therefor by the Director.
Section 13.10.020
PERMIT APPLICATION
A. Persons seeking an Industrial Wastewater Discharge
Permit shall complete and file with the Director an application
in the form prescribed by the Director and accompanied by the
applicable fees as set forth in the Master Fee Schedule as
modified from time to time by Resolution of the city Council.
The technical data submitted shall be projected or actual,
dependent upon applicable circumstance. The applicant may be
required to submit, in units and terms appropriate for
evaluation, the following information:
1. Name, address and Standard Industrial
Classification number of applicant;
2. Volume of wastewater to be discharged;
3. Wastewater constituents and characteristics
including but not necessarily limited to those
mentioned in Section 13.12.010 entitled
"Prohibited Discharges," all as determined by a
laboratory approved by the City;
4. Time and duration of discharge;
5. Average and 3D-minute peak wastewater flow rates,
including daily, monthly and seasonal variation if
any;
6. Description of activities, facilities and plant
processes on the premises including all materials
which are or could be discharged;
7. Plans or diagrams depicting location of on-site
sewer lines pumping stations and any reclamation
or pre-treatment facilities.
8. Time of food preparation operations (only required
for Food Establishments).
9. Description of food preparation, type, number of
meals served, cleanup procedures, dining room
~J.. - ,p, V
6/7/91 -- 19 -- Final
capacity, number of employees and number of
fixtures (only required Food Establishments).
10. Any other information as may be deemed by the
Director to be necessary to evaluate the permit
application.
B. The Director will review the data furnished by the
applicant and may require submission of additional information,
and may require approval by other concerned city departments.
After review and acceptance of the data furnished an on-site
inspection of the site and/or the industrial wastewater discharge
system or other systems or processes relating to the industrial
wastewater discharge may be required.
section 13.10.030
INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT -
ISSUANCE STANDARDS
An Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit shall be issued
only if the Director concludes from the information provided in
the application, any additional required information, and/or site
inspection, that the permitted discharge will not:
A. be in violation of Section 13.12.010.
B. damage the Wastewater System or Facilities.
C. impose unreasonable collection, treatment or disposal
costs on the City.
D. interfere with wastewater treatment or reclamation
processes.
E. be in violation of the Federal Water Pollution Control
Act, the Federal Clean Water Act and California
regulatory agencies requirements.
F. be in violation of the requirements of applicable
interagency agreements to which the City is signatory.
G. detrimentally affect the local environment.
Section 13.10.040
INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMITS -
APPROVAL - CONTENTS - DISPLAY
-A. The Director shall approve issuance- of an Industrial
Wastewater Discharge Permit when the application therefor is in
full conformity with Sections 13.10.020 and 13.10.030.
B. The Director may conditionally approve the permit. The
Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit may include quantity or
quality restrictions, submission of periodic reports, pre-
treatment of industrial wastewaters before discharge, restriction
3:l -o?5
6/7/91 -- 20 -- Final
of peak flow discharges, discharge of certain wastewaters only to
specified sewers of the City, relocation of point of discharge,
prohibition of discharge of certain wastewater components,
installation of monitoring and/or metering facilities,
restriction of discharge to certain hours of the day, payment of
additional charges to defray increased costs of the City created
by the wastewater discharge, repayment of costs incurred by the
city (relative to compliance tests, violations of the terms of
the permit, non-routine inspections and administrative
activities) and such other conditions as may be required to
effectuate the purpose of this Title.
C. The Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit shall
specify what discharges are permitted, any conditions imposed,
and that it is issued subject to all provisions of this Title and
all other regulations, user charges and fees established from
time to time by ordinance or resolution of the City Council, as
well as reimbursement of enforcement costs incurred by the city.
D. The permittee shall promptly post and continuously
display the Permit, or accurate and complete copies thereof, at
such bulletin board or other prominent place or places as to
assure its availability to persons associated with the industrial
wastewater discharge system or other systems or processes
relating to the permitted industrial wastewater discharge.
section 13.10.050
DURATION OF INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER DISCHARGE
PERMITS
A. Permits shall be issued for a specified time period,
not to exceed five (5) years. A permit may be issued for a
period less than a year or may be stated to expire on a specific
date.
B. Multi-year permits for all years other than the first
year shall be subject to submission of a renewal request and
payment of an annual permit fee thirty days prior to the annual
anniversary date of permit issuance. Single-year and the last
year of multi-year permits expire on the date specified and
therefore require submission of a new application for an
Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit and payment of the
appropriate permit fee at least thirty days prior to the permit
expiration date if the permit holder desires to continue
operations.
C. Any permit for which appropriate application or renewal
forms and annual permit fees (for multi-year permits) have not
been received by the expiration or anniversary date, as
appropriate, shall be considered expired or abandoned, and the
Director shall take appropriate enforcement action.
section 13.10.060
AMENDED PERMITS-FEE
~-~~
6/7/91 -- 21 -- Final
In addition to amended permits issued upon application of
the permit holder, any Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit
shall be subject to amendment by the Director at any time during
the life of the permit for any of the following reasons:
A. Existence of flows, concentrations or facilities not in
conformance with the permit.
B. Changes in state or Federal regulations.
C. Imposition of mass discharge limits.
D. Modifications to the list of prohibited discharges as
shown in section 13.12.010.
The Director shall issue an amended permit with such
conditions as appropriate. No fee shall be charged for issuance
of an amended permit pursuant to items B, C or D above. The fee
for an amended permit initiated by a permittee, or by the
Director necessitated by conditions described in item A above,
shall be in the amount set forth in the Master Fee Schedule and
paid by the holder of the permit. Any changes or new conditions
in a permit shall include a specified reasonable time schedule
for compliance.
section 13.10.070
TRANSFER OF AN INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER
DISCHARGE PERMIT OR CHANGED USE
Each Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit shall be issued
to a specific permittee for a specific location, specific use and
specific operation. Any sale, lease, transfer or assignment of
the premises or operation for which the permit was issued shall
require notice to the City and City approval which shall not be
unreasonably withheld. If the current operator, or, upon sale,
lease, transfer or assignment, the new operator, changes any
condition of operation, an amended permit shall first be applied
for and obtained.
Section 13.10.080
REVOCATION OF INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER DISCHARGE
PERMIT
A. The Director may revoke the permit of any permittee who
is found to be in violation of this chapter, or any applicable
local, State or Federal law or regulation, or who:
1. Fails to factually report the wastewater
constituents and characteristics of its discharge;
2. Fails to report significant changes in operations
or wastewater constituents and characteristics;
3. Refuses reasonable access to the permittee's
premises for the purpose of inspection or
monitoring;
~- "-7
6/7/91 -- 22 -- Final
4. Fails to pay for other than the first year of a
multi-year permit, appropriate charges, fees and
reimbursements within thirty (30) days prior to
the annual anniversary date of permit issuance.
5. Fails to pay compliance costs within thirty (30)
days following billing.
6. Causes or threatens to cause a condition of
contamination, pollution, or nuisance;
7. Fails to install grease pretreatment devices as
required by the permit (re food establishments).
8. Fails to fulfill reporting requirements or
pretreatment maintenance as required by the permit
(re food establishments).
9. violates any condition of the permit; or
10. Transmits false information relative to its
operations or discharge.
B. The Director shall give the permittee written notice of
intention to revoke the permit in accordance with the procedure
set forth in section 13.06.110.
section 13.10.090
MASS DISCHARGE LIMITS
The Director shall have the right to impose mass discharge
limits in lieu of, or in conjunction with concentration discharge
limits. Any such modifications shall be in writing and shall be
incorporated into amended Industrial Wastewater Discharge
Permits.
Section 13.10.100
PERMIT CONDITIONS, SUPPLEMENTAL REPORTS
The Director may at any time, with reasonable notice,
require submission of data and/or information in addition to that
required in the permit application or upon the permit. Such
supplemental report may include but not be limited to changes in
nature of process, volume, hourly rates of flow, mass emission
rate, production quantities, hours of operation or other
information which relates to the generation of waste, including
specified constituents and characteristics of the wastewater
discharge. Such report may also include the chemical
constituents and quantity of liquid or gaseous materials stored
on site even though they may not normally be discharged.
section 13.10.110
SUPPLEMENTAL SAMPLING AND MONITORING
REQUIREMENTS
3,? - ell i'
6/7/91 -- 23 -- Final
A. The Director may at any time with reasonable notice
require permittees to provide results of periodic measurements of
its discharge which include chemical analyses and/or flow. The
Director may require a sampling and/or a monitoring facility to
be furnished and operated at permittee's expense.
B. All permittees required to provide a monitoring
facility shall furnish and install at an appropriate location a
calibrated flume, weir, flow meter or similar device approved by
the Director suitable to measure flow rate and total volume. In
lieu of wastewater flow measurement and when deemed appropriate,
the Director may accept records of periodic water meter readings
and adjust the flow volume by suitable factors to determine peak
and average flow rates for the specific industrial wastewater
discharge.
c. The sampling and/or monitoring facility should normally
be situated on, the permittee's premises, but the Director may,
when such a location would be impractical or cause undue hardship
on the user, by encroachment permit separately applied for, allow
the facility to be constructed in the public street or sidewalk
area and located so that it will not be obstructed by landscaping
or parked vehicles.
D. Whether constructed on public or private property, the
sampling and monitoring facilities shall be provided in
accordance with the Director's requirements and shall be
completed within 90 days following written notification by the
Director unless a time extension is granted by the Director.
E. Those permittees required by the Director to make
periodic measurements of industrial wastewater flows and
constituents shall annually make the number of such periodic
measurements as required in the permit.
F. When required by the Director, permittees shall install
and maintain in proper order automatic flow-proportional sampling
equipment and/or automatic analysis and recording equipment.
G. Permittees shall allow the city or its representatives
ready access at all reasonable times to all parts of the premises
for purposes of sampling or in the performance of any of their
duties. The Director shall have the right to set up on the
permittee's property such devices as are necessary to conduct
sampling or metering operations. Where a permittee has security
measures in force, the permittee shall make the necessary
arrangements with their security guards so that upon presentation
of suitable identification, personnel of the city shall be
permitted to enter without delay.
H. All sampling, analysis and flow measurement procedures,
equipment, results and records shall be subject at any time to
inspection by the Director.
~-~7
6/7/91 -- 24 -- Final
section 13.10.120
COMPLIANCE COSTS
INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMIT
A. Persons discharging industrial wastewater to a pUblic
sewer without a Permit for Industrial Wastewater Discharge and
persons whose discharge is not in conformity with the conditions
of such a Permit shall pay for all actual costs incurred by the
city in order to bring them into compliance with this chapter
and/or conditions of the permit.
payment of compliance costs, if required, is in
addition to the annual Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit
fee. Compliance costs shall be paid within thirty (30) days
following billing. Non-payment of total charges within the
specified period will constitute grounds for revocation of a
permit and termination of sewer service in accordance with
Sections 13.06.100 and 13.10.070.
B. Costs will include but not be limited to those for the
following:
1. site inspection/investigation
2. Monitoring and sampling
3. Laboratory analyses
4. Hearings and other compliance meetings
5. Equipment and transportation
6. Management and overhead
7. Issuance of Notices of Violations and other
pertinent correspondence.
Section 13.10.130
PRE-TREATMENT, GENERAL
A. Permittees shall make wastewater acceptable under the
limitations established herein before discharging to any public
sewer. Any facilities required to pre-treat wastewater to a
level acceptable to the Director shall be provided and maintained
at the permittee's sole expense. Detailed plans, compliance
schedules and operating procedures shall be submitted to the
Director for review and shall be approved by the Director before
construction of the facility. The review of such plans and
operating procedures will in no way relieve the permittee from
the responsibility of modifying the facility as necessary to
produce an effluent acceptable under the provisions of this Title
and the Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit. Any subsequent
changes in the pre-treatment facilities or method of operation
shall be reported to and be approved by the Director. No
permittee shall increase the use of process water or, in any way,
~-~
6/7/91 -- 25 -- Final
attempt to dilute a discharge (except as allowed by Federal Pre-
treatment standards) as a partial or complete substitute for
adequate treatment to achieve compliance with any local, state or
Federal discharge standard.
B. The Director shall have the authority in negotiation
with any industrial permittee, to impose compliance schedules
relating to installation of specific pre-treatment equipment,
filing of reports and achievement of specific discharge
conditions including target parameter concentrations.
C. Pre-treated wastewater shall conform to categorical
pre-treatment standards promulgated by the U. s. Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA) under the authority of the Clean Water
Act, Sections 307(b) and (c).
section 13.10.140
PRETREATMENT-INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER FACILITIES
- APPROVAL OF PLANS AND ISSUANCE OF PERMITS
A. The applicant shall submit to the Director and to the
Director of Building and Housing for approval, such construction
plans and specifications and other details as required to fully
describe the proposed industrial wastewater pretreatment
facility. The plans shall have been prepared under the
supervision of and shall be signed by an engineer of suitable
training registered in the State of California.
B. The Director will approve plans for industrial
wastewater facilities construction, issue a Permit for Industrial
Wastewater Discharge or any other permit under this Code only if
it appears to the Director that the proposed industrial
wastewater facilities and the industrial wastewater discharge
conform to the requirements of this Title. The Director of
Building and Housing will approve plans for industrial wastewater
facilities construction, issue a building or any other permit
under this Code only if it appears to the Director of Building
and Housing that the proposed construction conforms to the
appropriate construction codes adopted by the city.
C.
approval
Title.
All required fees and charges shall be paid before
of plans or issuance of any permit required under this
D. The approval of plans or the issuance of a permit shall
not relieve the discharger of any duty imposed upon such
permittee by this Title.
Section 13.10.150
PRETREATMENT - GREASE - FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS
A. All Food Establishments shall install a Grease
Pretreatment Device in the waste line leading from the food
preparation area, or from sinks, drains, appliances and other
fixtures or equipment used in food preparation or cleanup to
where grease may be introduced into the sewerage system. Such
~-31
6/7/91 -- 26 -- Final
grease pretreatment devices shall be installed to remove grease
from wastewater and shall be maintained in efficient operating
condition by periodic removal of the accumulated grease. No such
collected grease shall be introduced into any drainage piping or
public sewer.
B. All Food Establishments shall also provide a collection
drum or container for the purpose of physically segregating oils,
greases and greasy solids. Food Establishments shall establish
procedures for personnel to practice maximum segregation of oils,
greases and greasy solids to the collection drum or container
prior to washing and other cleaning which goes into sewer. Food
Establishments shall properly remove and appropriately dispose of
the material captured from grease pretreatment devices on
wastewater lines and the collection drums for segregating oils,
greases and greasy solids.
section 13.10.160
MAINTENANCE REPORTS, FOOD ESTABLISHMENTS
Food Establishments shall keep records of grease
pretreatment device cleaning, maintenance and grease removal and
report on such maintenance to the Director at the times and in
the manner specified in their permits. The Director may also
require the permittee to provide periodic measurements of its
discharge, including chemical analysis of oil and grease content.
Section 13.10.170
PROTECTION FROM ACCIDENTAL DISCHARGE
A. Each permittee shall provide protection from accidental
discharges of materials prohibited by Section 13.12.010.
Permittees shall provide and maintain facilities to prevent
accidental prohibited discharge at the permittee'S own cost and
expense. Plans and specifications for such facilities shall be
subject to review and approved by the Director.
B. In the case of an accidental prohibited discharge, the
permittee shall:
1. Immediately notify both the Director and the city
of San Diego Water utilities Department Industrial
Waste Program (San Diego) of the incident. The
notification shall include: location of discharge,
type of waste, concentration and volume, and
corrective actions.
2. Within five (5) days following an accidental
discharge, submit to the Director and to San Diego
a detailed written report describing the cause of
the discharge and the measures to be taken by the
permittee to prevent similar future occurrences.
Such notification shall not relieve the permittee
of any expense, loss, damages or other liability
which may be incurred as a result of damage to any
wastewater systems, fish kills or any other damage
301- 3~
6/7/91 -- 27 -- Final
to persons or property; nor shall such
notification relieve the permittee of any fines,
civil penalties or other liability which may be
imposed by this Title or other applicable law.
3. Cause a notice to be permanently posted on the
permittee's bulletin board or other prominent
place prominently displaying for employees the
names and telephone numbers to call in the event
of an accidental prohibited discharge. Permittees
shall ensure that all employees who may cause,
allow or observe such an accidental discharge to
occur are properly trained regarding compliance
with the emergency notification procedures.
Section 13.10.180
LIMITATIONS ON THE USE OF GARBAGE GRINDERS
Matter from domestic, commercial, or industrial garbage
grinders shall not be discharged into the Wastewater System or
Facilities. However, matter generated by garbage grinders in the
preparation of food normally consumed on the premises is excepted
from this prohibition. Additionally, if the permittee has
obtained a permit for that specific use from the Director and
agrees to undertake whatever self-monitoring is required enable
the Director to equitably determine the sewer service charges
based on the waste constituents and characteristics, such matter
is also excepted. Such grinders must shred the waste to a degree
that all particles will be carried freely under the flow
condition normally prevailing in the public sewer. It is
unlawful to use a garbage grinder for grinding plastic, paper
products, inert materials or garden refuse.
Section 13.10.190
AVAILABILITY OF THE CITY'S WASTEWATER
FACILITIES
If wastewater facilities capacity is not available, the
Director may require the Industrial Wastewater Discharger
Permittee to restrict discharge until sufficient capacity can be
made available. When requested, the Director will advise persons
who desire to locate new facilities as to which areas within the
Wastewater System where industrial wastewater of the requestor's
proposed quantity and quality are expected to have sufficient
capacity. The Director may refuse sewer service to persons
locating facilities in areas where their proposed quantity or
quality of industrial wastewater is unacceptable for the
available Wastewater System or Facility.
section 13.10.200
RECORDS RETENTION
All permittees subject to this chapter of this Title shall
retain and preserve for not less than three (3) years, any
records, books, documents, memoranda, reports, correspondence and
any and all summaries thereof, relating to monitoring, sampling
and chemical analyses made by or on behalf of a permittee in
-g~- ~
6/7/91 -- 28 -- Final
connection with its discharge. All records which pertain to
matters which are the subject of administrative action or any
other enforcement or litigation activities brought by the city
shall be retained and preserved by the permittee until all
enforcement activities have concluded and all periods of
limitation with respect to any and all appeals have expired.
3~-3Y
6/7/91 -- 29 -- Final
CHAPTER 13.12
UNLAWFUL DISCHARGES TO THE WASTEWATER SYSTEM
Section 13.12.010
PROHIBITED DISCHARGES
A. Prohibited discharges shall include, but not be limited
to, those containing constituents enumerated in this Section.
Such prohibitions are applicable to all users of the wastewater
system. Any constituent not listed herein may be added by
regulation or other prohibition promulgated by the Director based
on results of technical determinations, the actions of regulatory
agencies, the projected impact of the constituent upon the
wastewater system, and the capacity of wastewater treatment
facilities to accommodate such constituent.
B. No person whether or not a permittee, shall discharge
or cause to be discharged directly or indirectly into a sewer
lateral or into the Wastewater System or Facilities, the
following:
1. Any gasoline, benzene, naphtha, solvent, fuel oil
or any liquid, solid or gas that would cause or
tend to ~ause flammable or explosive conditions to
result in the wastewater system.
2. Any matter containing toxic or poisonous solids,
liquids or gases in such quantities that, alone or
in combination with other substances, may create a
health hazard for humans, animals or the local
environment, interfere detrimentally with
wastewater treatment processes, cause a public
nuisance, or cause any hazardous condition to
occur in the wastewater system.
3. Any matter having a pH lower than 5.0 or greater
than 11.0 or having any corrosive or detrimental
characteristic that may cause injury to wastewater
treatment or maintenance personnel or may cause
damage to structures, equipment or other physical
facilities of the wastewater system.
4. Any solids or viscous substances or other matter
of such quality, size or quantity that they may
cause obstruction to flow in the sewer or be
detrimental to proper wastewater treatment plant
operations. These objectionable substances
include, but are not limited to, asphalt, dead
animals, offal, ashes, sand, mud, straw,
industrial process shavings, metal, glass, rags,
feathers, tar, wood, whole blood, paunch manure,
bones, hair and fleshings, entrails, fatty acids,
grease and oil, paper dishes, paper cups, milk
.3ot-3.5
6/7/91 -- 30 -- Final
containers, or other similar paper products,
either whole or ground.
5. Any rainwater, storm water, ground water, street
drainage, subsurface drainage, roof drainage, yard
drainage, water from yard fountains, ponds or lawn
sprays or any other uncontaminated water.
6. Any matter having a temperature higher than 150
degrees Fahrenheit (65 degrees Celsius), or at a
temperature which causes the influent to the waste
treatment plant to exceed 104 degrees Fahrenheit
(40 degrees Celsius).
7. Any matter containing more than 500 mg/1 of oil or
grease.
8. Any strongly odorous matter or matter tending to
create odors.
9. Any matter containing over 1.0 mg/1 of dissolved
sulfides.
10. Any matter with a pH high enough to cause alkaline
incrustations on sewer walls.
11. Any matter promoting or causing the promotion of
toxic gases.
12. Any matter requiring an excessive quantity of
chlorine or other chemical compound used for
disinfection purposes.
13. Any excessive amounts of deionized water, steam
condensate, distilled water or single pass cooling
water.
14. Any radioactive matter, except:
a. When the person is authorized to use
radioactive materials by the state Department
of Health or other governmental agency
empowered to regulate the use of radioactive
materials, and
b. When the matter is discharged in strict
conformity with current California Radiation
Control Regulations (California
Administrative Code, Title 17), and the
Nuclear Regulatory Commission regulations and
recommendations for safe disposal, and
~$
6/7/91 -- 31 -- Final
c. When the person is in compliance with all
rules and regulations of all other applicable
regulatory agencies
15. Any matter producing excessive discoloration of
the wastewater treatment plant effluent.
16. Any toxic materials including, but not limited to,
all heavy metals, cyanide, phenols, chlorinated
hydrocarbons and other organic compounds unless
limited to that concentration which complies with
all local, state and Federal discharge
limitations, and which does not interfere with the
operation of the wastewater facilities.
17. Any substance, liquid, gas or solid waste which
would cause a public nuisance or hazard to life,
or would be deleterious to the operation of
wastewater facilities or to the waters receiving
the discharge of the wastewater facilities.
18. Any cesspool or septic tank wastes.
~-v
6/7/91 -- 32 -- Final
CHAPTER 13.14
FEES
section 13.14.010
FEES - RECORD TO BE KEPT
The Director shall keep a permanent and accurate record of
the amount, source, parcel, and purpose for all payments received
under the provisions of this chapter.
section 13.14.020
FEES - SEWER CONSTRUCTION PERMIT FOR
INSTALLATIONS WITHIN PUBLIC RIGHT-OF-WAY
The applicant for a permit to construct a sewer lateral
within the public right-of-way shall pay to the City the fee as
presently designated or as may be amended in the future, in the
Master Fee Schedule.
section 13.14.030
CONNECTION TO PUBLIC SEWER - FEE
A. Any person applying for a permit to develop or modify
the use of any parcel shall provide sewer service capability to
that parcel at the property owner's expense. Where the owner
constructs, or contributes toward the costs of construction an
amount in excess of the amount commensurate with the benefits to
be received, as determined by the Director, the City may enter
into a Reimbursement Agreement with such person.
B. Any person desiring to connect, directly or indirectly,
any parcel or any building thereon to any public sewer which has
been constructed at no cost to the parcel to be connected, shall
pay a one-time Sewer Connection Fee to the city in the amount as
presently designated, or as may be amended in the future, in the
Master Fee Schedule adopted by the City Council pursuant to and
in accordance with the procedures set forth in Government Code
section 66016. All revenue derived from such fees shall be
deposited in the Sewer Income Fund. The amount of such fee
shall be determined by one of the following methods of
calculation:
1. General Front Footage
2. Other reasonable method as determined by Council
resolution
3. Reimbursement Agreement
section 13.14.040
PUBLIC SEWER CONNECTION FEE- METHODS OF
CALCULATION
The Director may issue a permit to make connection to the
public sewer system upon payment of all fees required by
u-~
6/7/91 -- 33 -- Final
ordinances and resolutions of the City including the sewer
connection fee calculated on the basis of either:
A. General Front Footage: In the absence of a valid
applicable Reimbursement Contract for repayment of costs involved
in constructing public sewer facilities, the payment of the fee
as set forth in the Master Fee Schedule per front foot of the
parcel sought to be connected. However, such front foot fee shall
not be imposed upon a person who constructed or paid for the
construction of the public sewer into which connection is
sought; or
B. Special Circumstances: Whenever the City Council, on
recommendation of the Director, determines that any public sewer
benefits property which does not front upon such sewer, or where
property does face upon a sewer, but where the shape of the
property is other than the usual rectangular shape or where it is
unusual in area, or where for any other reason the strict
adherence to the front foot charge provided in paragraph A of
this section would require a property owner to pay an amount not
commensurate with the benefits to be received, the City Council
may, by resolution, determine the amount of money which such
property or any unit portion thereof shall pay, in addition to
and prior to the payment of other permit and connection fees.
Such resolution shall take into consideration any contributions
made by a property owner toward the cost of the construction of
the sewer line in arriving at the amount of money to be paid by
such property owner.
Prior to the adoption of such resolution, the Director
may allow a property owner to make use of such sewer facilities
upon the owner guaranteeing to pay the amount to be provided in
such resolution, and upon the deposit of an amount of money
estimated by the Director to be adequate, as a guarantee of the
payment of the amount to be provided in the resolution; or
C. Reimbursement Agreement: The City may choose to enter
into Reimbursement Agreements with persons, whether subdividers
or not, who have constructed public sewer facilities with their
own money and which facilities benefitted property the owners of
which did not contribute to the construction of such facilities.
Any such property owner desiring to be connected to any such
public sewer facility, if such property or the owner thereof did
not contribute toward the cost of the construction, shall not be
permitted to connect without first paying the fee established in
the applicable Reimbursement Agreement on file in the Office of
the 6irector.
Section 13.14.050
PUBLIC SEWER CONNECTION FEE - REIMBURSEMENT
AGREEMENT - COLLECTION BY CITY
The city shall endeavor to collect the charges set forth in
the various Reimbursement Agreements on file in the Office of the
Director and cause the sum so collected, less city expense as set
~-~
6/7/91 -- 34 -- Final
forth in the contract, to be reimbursed as provided in this
chapter, but it shall not be liable for any failure to make such
collection or reimbursement, and such obligation to collect such
charges shall terminate six years from the date the sewer
facility is accepted as being completed by the City, except as
may be provided hereinafter in this Chapter.
Section 13.14.060
PUBLIC SEWER CONNECTION FEE - REIMBURSEMENT
AGREEMENT - OBLIGATION OF OWNER TO CLAIM
MONEY - FORFEIT WHEN
It shall be the obligation of the person, whether a
subdivider or not, to inquire of the City whether any such
amounts have been paid into the City by a property owner who did
not previously contribute toward the cost of the construction of
the sewer facilities. If any such money remains on deposit with
the City without being claimed by the party rightfully entitled
to it within one year it is deposited, such money shall be
forfeited to the city, and then it shall be transferred to the
Sewer Income Fund of the City.
section 13.14.070
PUBLIC SEWER CONNECTION FEE - REIMBURSEMENT
AGREEMENT - SEWER FACILITIES OF SPECIAL
IMPORTANCE - ADDITIONAL SPECIFICATIONS ON
CHARGES
If the City Council finds that a particular sewer facility
is of special public interest because of its major importance to
the City, it may, notwithstanding any other provision of this
article allow, by resolution, the following:
A. Time for reimbursement: That the right to
reimbursement for any subdivider, or for any individual, firm or
corporation, as contemplated in this chapter, may be extended up
to twenty years from the date of that the sewer facility is
accepted as being completed by the City;
B. Interest added to charge: That, up to seven percent
per year of the amount of the charge may be added thereto, but,
however, only for the period fixed pursuant to the preceding
paragraph and the person who is entitled to reimbursement as
contemplated in this chapter shall be entitled to receive such
charge and the interest paid thereon. Interest shall be computed
on a quarterly basis, and it shall be computed up to but not
including the quarter in which payment of such charge is paid.
section 13.14.080
PUBLIC SEWER CONNECTION FEE- REIMBURSEMENT
AGREEMENT- LIABILITY FOR FUTURE CHARGES NOT
RELIEVED
In the event that any parcel for which a Public Sewer
Reimbursement Agreement Fee has been paid receives additional
benefit from any public sewer in the collection system of the
City, the payment of such fee shall not relieve the parcel owner
~-#O
6/7/91 -- 35 -- Final
from payment for such additional benefit, nor shall the property
be relieved from the levy of a special assessment under any
special assessment statute of the state for such additional
benefit.
section 13.14.090
SEWER CAPACITY CHARGE
A. The owner or person making application for a permit to
develop or modify use of any residential, commercial, industrial
or other property which is projected by the Director to increase
the volume of flow in the City sewer system by at least one-half
of one equivalent dwelling unit of flow shall pay a Sewer
Capacity Charge. All revenue derived from such fees shall be
deposited in the Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve Fund. The amount of
such charge shall be the amount presently designated in the
Master Fee Schedule, or as amended by the City Council pursuant
to and in accordance with the procedures set forth in Government
Code section 66016.
B. One equivalent dwelling unit (EDU) of flow is defined
to be 265 gallons per day of sewage generation. The fee for
property involving a modification in use shall reflect only the
increase in sewage generation projected from that property. The
following rates of flow for various land uses shall be utilized
in determining the total fee due for any given property:
Land Use
EDUs of
Flow
1.0
0.75
1.0
1.0
.33
1.0
1.0
Single family residence
Apartment/Condominium living unit
Hospital bed
Mobile Home
Motel, hotel living unit
Church, theater, auditorium
Per each unit of seating capacity
(One unit being 110 persons or
any fraction thereof)
Restaurant
(2.67 plus seating allocation of
1.0 for each 10 seats or fraction
thereof)
Service station
Self service laundry - per washer
Other (see below)
2.67 +
variable
2.50
.75
In the case of commercial, industrial and other
developments not included above, the number of equivalent
dwelling units of flow shall be determined in each case by the
Director and shall be based upon the estimated volume of sewage
to be discharged into the city sewer system. The flow rate for
property involving a modification in land use shall reflect only
~~-If)
6/7/91 -- 36 -- Final
the increase in sewage generation project from that property
which exceeds .50 equivalent dwelling units of flow.
Section 13.14.100
SEWAGE PUMP STATION CHARGE - DISPOSITION OF
REVENUE - DETERMINATION OF CHARGES
A. The owner or occupant of any parcel of real property
connected to a sewage pump station which is a part of the
wastewater system of the City and situated within a Special Sewer
Service Rate Area established by the city Council shall pay a
sewage Pump Station Charge in the amount set forth in the
ordinance establishing such Area, or as amended by the City
council from time to time, as designated for administrative
convenience only in the Master Fee Schedule.
B. All revenue derived from sewage pump station charges
shall be deposited into the separate fund deemed appropriate by
the Director of Finance.
C. Sewage pump station charges shall be based upon actual
labor, material, equipment, energy and overhead costs experienced
by the City relative to each sewage pump station except for
first-year costs which shall be estimated by the Director.
Distribution of sewage lift station costs amoung benefitted
parcels shall be as specified in the ordinance establishing the
Area, as reflected for administrative convenience only in the
Master Fee Schedule.
Section 13.14.110
SEWER SERVICE CHARGES DESIGNATED - PAYMENT
REQUIRED - DOMESTIC PURPOSES DEFINED
A. In addition to other fees, assessments or charges
provided by the city Code or otherwise, the owner or occupant of
any parcel of real property which said parcel is connected to the
sewer system of the City and to water system maintained by the
Sweetwater Authority, the Otay Water District or the California -
American Water Company shall pay a Sewer Service Charge in the
amount presently designated in the Master Fee Schedule, or as
amended by the City Council pursuant to and in accordance with
the procedures set forth in Government Code section 66018.
B. All revenue derived from such charges shall be deposited
into the Sewer Income Fund.
-C. For the purpose of this section, real property shall be
deemed to be used for domestic purposes when such property is
used solely for single-family residences or the furnishing of
lodging by the operation of hotels, auto courts, apartment
houses, bungalow courts, housing units, roominghouses, motels,
trailer parks, or the rental of property for lodging purposes.
u-~
6/7/91 -- 37 -- Final
D. Sewer service charges to users in the Montgomery
Annexation Area shall be collected in the form of annual charges
via property tax bills prepared by the San Diego County Assessor
through the end of '91-'92 fiscal year. Montgomery Area charges
shall be comparable to those of the remainder of the city, after
credit for unused reserve monies, acquired by the City during the
Area annexation process, has been applied. Beginning July 1,
1992, sewer service charges for the Montgomery Annexation area
shall be billed and collected in the same manner as in the rest
of the City.
section 13.14.120 Reduced sewer service charges permitted when-
application-contents-refunds-fees
A. The Director of Finance shall have the authority to
certify eligibility for a reduced sewer service charge, in the
amount of seventy percent (70%) of the rate charged other
residential users, upon investigation, or upon application by the
occupant of a single family residence, apartment, condominium or
mobilehome when the occupant:
1. Meets the low income eligibility criteria set forth
in the Master Fee Schedule, or
2. Provides proof of payment of a mont~ly sewer charge
greater than the minimum sewer serV1ce charge as set
forth in the Master Fee Schedule.
B. The occupant of premises subject to a sewer charge may
request a reduced sewer service charge by filing a completed City
application form. The applicant shall furnish data regarding the
type of unit, number of people in the household and proof of
total annual income (gross) of the household. Application forms
may be obtained from the City'S Finance Department. Certification
of eligibility shall be annually established with the Director of
Finance.
C. Eligible occupants of single family homes subject to the
sewer service charge shall have the option of either requesting
an annual refund from the City or requesting the reduced sewer
charge be applied on the sewer billing as shown on the monthly or
bi-monthly water bills.
D. Residents of apartments, condominiums or mobilehomes who
are eligible for the reduced sewer service charge shall receive
the reduced sewer charge as an annual refund only.
E. Requests for annual refunds shall be made by eligible
households between August 1 and September 30 of each year for the
past fiscal year beginning in July and ending in June. The
applicant will be notified of eligibility status within thirty
(30) days of application and, if eligible, a refund shall be
forwarded within ninety (90) days of application.
~~
6/7/91 -- 38 -- Final
F. Residents of the incorporated Montgomery District will
not be eligible for either refunds or a reduced sewer service
charge at the present time; they will, however, be eligible for
the reduced sewer service charge once they are subject to the
full sewer service charge set by the Master Fee Schedule because
the special supplement fund is exhausted.
Section 13.14.130
SEWER SERVICE CHARGE VARIANCES PERMITTED WHEN
- APPLICATION - CONTENTS - FEES
A. The city Manager shall have the power to establish
rules and regulations for the granting of variances from the
established sewer service charges provided such rules and
regulations shall be approved by resolution of the city Council.
The city Manager shall have the power to grant variances from
established sewer service charge billing categories upon receipt
of a variance application as hereinafter provided from the owner
or occupant of any premises, and one or more of the following
situations exist:
1. Where a non-residential user's wastewater contains
a total suspended solids concentration
sufficiently low as to qualify for a different
sewer service charge strength category.
2. Where a substantial portion of the premises of an
industrial or commercial establishment is used for
industrial, commercial, recreational,
horticultural or agricultural purposes of such a
nature that the water supplied to such premises is
not substantially discharged into the sewer
system.
B. The owner or occupant of any premises subject to the
sewer service charge may apply in writing to the City Manager for
a reclassification of such premises (variance) under the
provisions of subparagraphs A 1 or 2, above; provided, however,
that no rebate upon such reclassification shall be allowed for a
period more than ninety (90) days preceding the filing of such
application. The applicant shall furnish substantial engineering
and factual data to support the applicant's contention that the
premises should be reclassified as provided in this section.
C. The owner or occupant of any premises requesting a
variance from the sewer service charges pursuant to the
provisions of this section and the rules and regulations approved
by resolution of the City council shall pay a fee as presently
designated, or as may in the future be amended, in the Master Fee
Schedule to cover the cost of investigation of said request;
provided, however, that no fee shall be charged for a request for
total exemption from the sewer service charge. In addition, a
special handling charge to cover the cost of billing and
~ -If'f
6/7/91 -- 39 -- Final
inspections to be paid per billing may be established in the
resolution granting the variance.
section 13.14.140
SEWER SERVICE CHARGE EXEMPTIONS PERMITTED
WHEN - APPLICATION - CONTENTS
A. The Director shall have the power to certify exemption
from payment of sewer service charges either upon investigation
or upon receipt of application from the owner or occupant of any
premises, provided one or more of the following situations
exists:
1. Where a fire service connection to the water
system is installed;
2. Where the premises are not connected to the
wastewater system of the citYi
3. When water is supplied to the premises through a
separate water meter measuring irrigation water
and that water is used entirely for irrigation
purposes.
B. The owner or occupant of any premises subject to the
sewer service charge may apply in writing to the Director for
exemption of such premises under the provisions of subsection Ai
provided, however, that no rebate upon such exemption shall be
allowed for a period more than ninety days preceding the filing
of such application. The applicant shall furnish substantial
evidence to support the applicant's contention that the premises
should be exempted as provided in this section.
C. No fee shall be charged for a request for exemption
from the sewer service charge.
section 13.14.150
PAYMENT OF SEWER SERVICE AND PUMP STATION
CHARGES - PENALTY FOR DELINQUENCY -
DISCONTINUANCE OF SERVICE - WHEN - UNLAWFUL
CONNECTION - BACKBILLING AND PENALTY
A. All sewer service and pump station operation and
maintenence charges , except those described in subsection F
hereinbelow, shall be computed upon a monthly or bi-monthly basis
as determined by the city or the serving water agency, and shall
be payable upon the billing of such charges to the owner or the
occupant.
B. The charges and the billing therefor may be combined
with other utility bills and separately designated.
C. If the sewer service and/or pump station charge for
users other than those described in subsection F, is not paid
~-~
6/7/91 -- 40 -- Final
before the close of business or postmarked before midnight of the
final date for payment as shown on the billing, a penalty of
twenty percent of the charge(s) shall be added thereto; provided,
however, that when the final day for payment falls on Saturday,
Sunday or a legal holiday, payment may be made without penalty on
the next regular business day.
D. In the event the owner or occupant of any premises
shall be delinquent in payment of the sewer service charge and
such delinquency continues for a period of five days after the
final date for payment of such charge, the City shall have the
right, forthwith and without notice, to discontinue sewer service
to such delinquent owner or occupant, and sewer service shall not
again be supplied to such person until all delinquent sewer
service charges plus the penalties thereon as herein provided
have been paid. The sewer service charge may be collected by
suit in any court of competent jurisdiction or any other manner.
E. In the event that any parcel or building is determined
by the Director to have been unlawfully connected to the public
wastewater system, the City shall have the right to terminate
sewer service to such parcel or building as provided in section
13.06.110. Sewer service shall not again be supplied to such
parcel or building until all delinquent sewer service charges
which have been accumulated during the current ownership of the
parcel or building, plus a penalty of 20% of the delinquent sewer
service charge, has been paid.
F. Sewer service charges for users in the Montgomery
Annexation Area shall be collected in the form of annual charges
via property tax bills prepared by the San Diego County Assessor
through the end of 1991-1992 fiscal year. Montgomery Area
charges shall be comparable to those of the remainder of the
city, after credit for unused reserve monies, acquired by the
city during the Area annexation process, has been applied.
Beginning July 1, 1992, sewer service charges for the Montgomery
Annexation area shall be billed and collected in the same manner
as in the rest of the city.
section 13.14.160
SEWER SERVICE DEPOSITS REQUIRED WHEN - AMOUNT
A. Guarantee deposits may be required from all applicants
for sewer service who are not the legal or equitable owners of
the property to be served, except applicants for domestic sewer
service.
"B. The city has the right to require deposits from the
owner or occupant of any premises who has allowed his bill for
sewer service charge to become delinquent or who does not have an
acceptable credit rating.
C. Deposits shall be equal to the estimated amount of
three months' sewer service charges, but in no event shall the
deposit be less than twenty-five dollars.
~-~
6/7/91 -- 41 -- Final
section 13.14.170
INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER DISCHARGE PERMITS -
FEES - COSTS INCLUDED IN FEES
A. Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit fees and annual
renewal fees shall be based on the wastewater constituants and
characteristics of the discharges to the wastewater System.
Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permit fees and annual renewal
fees shall be the amount designated in the Master Fee Schedule,
as amended by Council Resolution from time to time, pursuant to
and in accordance with the procedures set forth in Government
Code section 66018. All revenue derived from issuance or renewal
of Industrial Wastewater Discharge Permits shall be deposited
into the Sewer Service Revenue Fund.
B. The regular permit fee and annual renewal fee shall
include expenses incurred by the City for permit processing, data
evaluation, routine on-site inspections, monitoring, sampling or
chemical analysis whether performed by the City or other entity
acting in the City'S behalf. Costs relative to permit violations
are NOT included in the annual permit fee and will be billed
separately in accordance with the provisions stated on the
permit, and/or section 13.10.130.
SECTION VIII. That a new Title 14 entitled " WATERCOURSES " is
added to the Chu1a vista Municipal Code.
SECTION IX. That Chapters 13.48, 13.52, 13.56, 13.60, 13.64,
and 13.68 of the Chula vista Municipal Code are added to new
Title 14 and renumbered, respectively, Chapters 14.04, 14.06,
14.08, 14.10, 14.14 and 14.18.
SECTION X. Effective Date. This ordinance shall take effect
and be in full force on the thirtieth day from and after its
adoption.
Presented By
Approved as to form by
John P. Lippitt,
Director of Public Works
.Ad,:-0 t:ZS "/7!q,
D. Richard Rud f
Asst. City Attorney
5~ - ~7
6/7/91 -- 42 -- Final
RESOLUTION NO.~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE MASTER FEE SCHEDULE
TO MAKE TECHNICAL REORGANIZATIONAL CHANGES AND
ESTABLISH NEW INDUSTRIAL WASTEWATER DISCHARGE
PERMIT FEES
The City Council of the City of Chu1a Vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, on June 18, 1991, the City Council adopted
Ordinance No. making structural changes to Titles 3, 13 and
14 of the Chu1a vista Municipal Code relating to sewer fees; and
WHEREAS, as a result of said ordinance, all fees
by the City relating to sewers are now found in a new
13.14, necessitating reorganization and/or amendment
comparable sections in the Master Fee Schedule; and
imposed
Chapter
of the
WHEREAS, the new ordinance imposes new fees wi th
relation to industrial wastewater discharge permits necessitating
new provisions in the Master Fee Schedule for the imposition of
said fees.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chu1a Vista does hereby amend the amend the Master
Fee Schedule as follows:
1. Section 3.20.020 is renumbered to Section 13.14.110.
2. Section 3.20.022 is renumbered to Section 13.14.120..
3. Section 3.20.030 is renumbered to Section 13.14.130.
4. Section 13.14.020 is renumbered to Section 13.14.090.
5. Section 13.16.020 is renumbered to Section 13.14.020.
6. Section 13.16.170 is renumbered to Section 13.14~030.
7. Section 13.20.100 is repealed.
8. Section 13.20.110 is repealed.
9. Section 13.20.120 is repealed.
~ -(J~
-1-
10. section 13.20.130 is repealed.
11. A new Section 13.14.170 is added to read:
Sec. 13.14.170 Industrial wastewater Discharge Permit Fees.
The fee for an initial, annual renewal, or amended industrial
wastewater discharge permit required by Chula Vista Municipal Code
Section 13.14.170 and section 13.10.060 shall be determined as
follows:
The fee shall be based upon the permit category (Table "A") to which
the permitted industry is assigned, and the average daily volume of
industrial wastewater discharged to the public sewer system in the
amount set forth in Table "B".
TABLE A
Permit Category
Description
1
Industries which discharge wastewater from a
process subject to EPA categorical standards
set forth in 40 Code of Federal Regulations,
Section 403, Appendix C, as amended from time
to time. The industr ies currently subject to
EPA categorical standards are listed below in
Table 1, but are subject to change.
2
Industries that are not subject to EPA
categorical standards but which discharge
wastewater containing toxic pollutants
identified by EPA in 40 CFR, Section 403,
Appendix B. The current list of toxic
pollutants identified by EPA is set forth below
in Table 2, but is subject to change.
3
Industr ies not subject to EPA ca tegor ical
standards and which do not discharge wastewater
containing EPA identified toxic pollutants.
3.A. -If'T
-2-
TABLE B
Flow (Average Daily
Industrial Wastewater
Flow in Gallons Per Day
1
Permit Fee (Annual)
Permit category
2
3
More than 100,000
50,001 to 100,000
25,001 to 50,000
10,001 to 25,000
100 to 10,000
Less than 100
$2,000
1,500
1,250
650
500
25
$1,200
1,000
600
500
275
25
$1,000
600
500
300
200
25
TABLE 1
INDUSTRIAL CATEGORIES
Adhesives and Sealants Mfg.
Aluminum Forming
Asbestos Mfg.
Auto Repair
Battery Mfg.
Bottling Plants
Canneries
Car/Truck Washes
Cement Mfg.
Coal Mining
Coil Coating
Copper Forming
Electrical and Electronic
Products Mfg.
Electroplating
Explosives Mfg.
Feed Lots
Fertilizer Mfg.
Food processing Plants
Glass Mfg.
Gum and Wood Chemicals Mfg.
Hospitals
Ink Formulation
Inorganic Chemicals Mfg.
Iron and Steel Mfg.
Laboratories
Laundries
Leather Tanning and Finishing
Metal Finishing
Metal MOlding and Casting
Nonferrous Metals Forming
Ore Mining and Dressing
Organic Chemicals Mfg.
packing Houses
Paint Formulation
Petroleum Refining
Pesticides Mfg.
Pharmeceuticals Mfg.
Photoprocessing
plastics Molding and Forming
procelain Enameling
Printing and Publishing
procelain Enameling
Rendering
Rubber processing
Soaps and Detergents Mfg.
Steam Electric Power Generation
Tars and Asphalt Mfg.
Textile Mills
Timer Products Processing
Industries within these categories have been identified as potential
dischargers of either prohibited wastes or toxic pollutants. Table 2
lists the toxic pollutants identified by the .Environmental Protection
Agency- (EPA).
3~- 50
-3-
TABLE 2
LIST OF 65 TOXIC POLLUTANTS IDENTIFIED BY EPA
Acenaphthene
Acrolein
Acrylonitrile
Aldrin/Dieldrin
Antimony and compounds
Arsenic and compounds
Asbestos
Benzene
Benzidine
Beryllium and compounds
Cadmium and compounds
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlordane
Chlorinated benzenes
Chlorinated ethanes
Chloralkyl ethers
Chlorinated naphthalene
Chloroform
2-Chlorophenol
Chromium and compounds
Copper and compounds
Cyanides
DDT and metabolites
Dichlorobenzenes
Dichlorobenzidine
Dichloroethylenes
2,4-dichlorophenol
Dichloropropane &
Dichloropropene
2,4-dimethylphenol
Dinitrotoluene
Diphenylhydrazine
Endosulfan and metabolites
Endrin and metabolites
Ethybenzene
Fluoranthene
Haloethers
Halomethane
Heptachor andmetabolites
Hexachlorobutadiene
Hexachlorocyclopentadiene
Hexachlorocyclohexane
Isophorone
Lead and compounds
Mercury and compounds
Napththalene
Nickel and compounds
Nitrobenzene
Nitrophenols
Nitrosamines
pentachlorophenol
Phenol
Phthalate esters
POlychlorinated biphenyls (PCBS)
polynuclear aromatic
hydrocarbons
Selenium and compounds
Silver and compounds
2,3,7, 8-tetrachlorodibenzo-
p-dioxin (TCDD)
Tetrachloroethylene
Thallium and compounds
Toluene
Toxaphene
Trichloroethylene
Vinyl chloride
Zinc and compounds
12. Section 13.56.050 is renumbered to section 14.08.050 and amended
to read:
"The fee for a watercourse permit
X$j~gj~~~ 14.08.050 of the Municipal
that authorized for the grading permit
15.04.295 of the Muncipal Code."
as author ized in Section
Code shall be the same as
under sections 15.04.290 and
Presented by
Approved as to form by
John P. Lippitt, Director
of Public Works
8944a
J...w. .~ ~
D. R1chard Ru
City Attorney
~--fI
.
,''-
I
J..... James M Montqmncry
--
Consultil1D Engineers. Inc
City of Chula Vista
Wastewater Rate Plan and
Revenue Program
May 1991
Serving the World's
Environmental Needs
T c!. fj 1 e. 7~)ll ~) 1 ,11
tdX aw ,1/193741
;)!IJ Nn'n-I MacJi,;()I',Avc:IIIJ('
F'a";;:FI'?lkl. C.'llr1url"lld !Jl101
..111M James M. Montgomery
--- -- ,---
Consulting Engineers, Ine
May 13, l':J':Jl
..
Mr. John P. Lippitt
Director of Public Works
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, California 92010
Subject:
Transmittal of Wastewater Rate Plan and Revenue Program
Dear Mr. Lippitt:
James M. Montgomery, Consulting Engineers, Inc. (JMM) is pleased to submit the enclosed City
of Chula Vista Wastewater Rate Plan and Revenue Program, which will we understand will be
included in the package given to your City Council. Frank Peters of the State Water Resources
Control Board (SWRCB) has reviewed the final draft of this document and has given his verbal
approval of the findings.
The sewer service charges recommended in the report should enable the City to raise adequate
revenues to allow for the proper operation and maintenance of the Chula Vista Sewerage System,
meet current payment requirements to the City of San Diego for use of the Metropolitan
Sewerage (Metro) System, and ease future rate increases that will become necessary to finance
future Metro and San Diego Clean Water Program improvements. The recommended rate
structure complies with the fair and equitable guidelines required by the SWRCB. The
recommended sewer service charges for single family residences are consistent with your
projections of last year.
Should you have any questions or comments or should you require any assistance with
presentations before the City Council or the Montgomery Planning Commission, please call me.
Very truly yours,
H~~
James R. Leserman
Project Engineer
Table of Contents
Page
Introduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
Basic Methodology ......................................... 2
Montgomery Sanitation District Area . . . . . . . '. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
Spring Valley Sanitation District ................................ 3
Cost Allocations ........................................... 3
Non-Rate Revenues ......................................... 4
User Classes ............................................. 4
Low-Income Users. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Billings . . . . . . . . . .. ...................................... 5
Revenue Program Forms . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Rate Recommendations ...................................... 8
Appendix A - Cost Details .................................... A-I
Appendix B - Partial Water User and Consumption Summary. . . . . . . . . . . . B-1
-i-
Table
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
Table of Contents
List of Tables
Title
City of Chula Vista Cost Allocation Fiscal Year 1990-91 . . . . . . . . .
City of Chula Vista Cost Allocation Fiscal Year 1991-92 . . . . . . . . .
City of Chula Vista Cost Allocation Fiscal Year 1990-91 . . . . . . . . .
City of Chula Vista Cost Allocation Fiscal year 1991-92 . . . . . . . . .
Non-Rate Revenues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Non-Rate Revenue Allocation Fiscal Year 1991-92 . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proposed User Classifications and Assumed Pollutant Concentrations
Summary of Users and Wastewater Characteristics .............
Operation and Maintenance Costs and Debt Service ............
Capital Cost Allocation ................................
Reserve Fund Increases ................................
Unit Cost Detennination ...............................
Summary of Fund Costs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Total Revenue. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Proposed Sewer Service Charges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
-ll-
Page
No.
9
11
13
14
15
18
19
20
22
24
26
27
29
31
33
INTRODUCTION
The City of Chula Vista is responsible for the operation and maintenance of the local
collection system. Wastewater from the City of Chula Vista is discharged into the
interceptors of the Metropolitan Sewerage (Metro) System, and conveyed to the Metro
wastewater treatment facility at Point Lorna for treatment and disposal. The Metro
facilities are currently owned and operated by the City of San Diego. Chula Vista makes
various payments to the City of San Diego for the privilege of using the Metro system,
in accordance with the terms of a contract between the two cities.
Since the City of Chula Vista's treatment authority, the City of San Diego, has received
Clean Water Grant funding in the past, state and federal rules and regulations require that
a user charge program for Chula Vista must conform to certain limitations, as set forth
in Clean Water Grant Program Bulletin 54 C. The bulletin was published by the State
Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), the state authority and federal representative
on Clean Water Grant affairs.
These state and federal regulations require that Chula Vista set sewer user charges at a
level, which in combination with interest on operating funds and miscellaneous fees, are
sufficient to at least offset system operation and maintenance costs. The costs of
operating and maintaining the system must be allocated to user classes fairly and
equitably based on the quantity and strength of the wastewater generated by the users.
The City of Chula Vista's current user charge system is based solely on the allocation of
costs to flow. Therefore the actual or estimated strength of each user or class of users
must be considered in the determination of sewer service charges.
This report sets forth the information and procedures used to develop a user charge
program for Chula Vista. It is intended that the report become the basis for regular
updates of the user charge program to ensure continued financial stability of the District
and conformity with SWRCB guidelines. Incorporated into the report are Forms I
through 6, which correspond to the Revenue Program format recommended by the
SWRCB.
The Metro System provides wastewater treatment and disposal to Chula Vista under the
terms of a contract that, among other things, call for the payment of various charges,
based on either flow or capacity. Chula Vista is currently entitled to 19.2 million gallons
per day (mgd) of treatment capacity in the Metro System. The City estimates a current
wastewater flow of approximately 12.8 mgd.
-1-
City of Chula Vista
Wastewater Rate Plan and Revenue Program
BASIC METHODOLOGY
This revenue program addresses the revenue requirements of the City of Chula Vista
Wastewater System for the 1991-92 fiscal year, beginning July I, 1991.
The wastewater system serving the City of Chula Vista consists of two basic components:
the City of Chula Vista collection and conveyance system and the San Diego Metro
treatment and disposal system.
Cost, budgetary, and demographic information provided by the Cities of San Diego and
Chula Vista, and user data provided by the California American Water Company (as
reported by City staff), Otay Water District, and Sweetwater Authority constitute the
bases for the revenue program.
Information provided by the City of Chula Vista includes a printout of all land uses for
all parcels within the City, a list of large commercial users with wastewater generation
over 25,000 gallons per day, cost reports by fund and functional area, depreciation
schedules, and capital improvement programs. The City reports no bonded indebtedness
for the City of Chula Vista Sewerage System.
San Diego Metro cost information is derived from the "Wastewater Rate Study and
Financial Plan: Accelerated Projects at Point Lorna (March 30, 1990)", costs projection
tables produced by San Diego Clean Water Program staff, and conversations with San
Diego staff and consultants.
MONTGOMERY SANITATION DISTRICT AREA
In 1986 the Montgomery Sanitation District was annexed into the City of Chula Vista.
Along with other services in this formerly unincorporated area (Montgomery Area),
wastewater collection and conveyance services became the responsibility of the City of
Chula Vista. Since 1963 wastewater treatment and disposal services for the Montgomery
Area have been and continue to be provided by the City of San Diego Metro Program.
Since the annexation Chula Vista has maintained a distinction between the Montgomery
Area and the Pre-Annexation Chula Vista area. Each area has distinct funds from which
revenues are accrued and expenditures are made. It is assumed that the relative make-up
of the two areas in terms of proportion of types of commercial users is identical and
hence, the relative solids loadings are identical. The estimated strengths of the wastewater
generated by the two areas are similar so all common costs are divided between the two
areas in proportion to their respective flows. Within the next two or three years the City
intends to eliminate the distinction and treat both areas of the City as one. Until that
time, a separate revenue program must be performed for each portion, with separate unit
cost developments for each. Forms I through 6 refer to the Pre-Annexation portion of
the City while Forms 1M through 6M refer to the Montgomery Area.
-2-
City of Chula Vista
Wastewater Rate Plan and Revenue Program
SPRING VALLEY SANITATION DISTRICT
A portion of the flow (approximately 2.2 MOD) that is generated within the Pre-
Annexation Chula Vista area flows through the Spring Valley Sanitation District before
entering the Metro system. Spring Valley passes on the Metro costs to Chula Vista plus
a 10 percent surcharge for conveyance.
COST ALLOCATIONS
Detailed costs for Chula Vista's Wastewater Utility, as presented in City financial and
accounting documents, are summarized in Appendix A. The Metro costs are summarized
in Tables 1 and 2 for the 1990-91 and 1992 fiscal years, respectively. The costs
presented in Tables 1 and 2 reflect the estimates made by the City of San Diego rather
than the Chula Vista budgeted figures of Appendix A. The City of Chula Vista collection
and conveyance system costs are summarized by major fund group in Tables 3 and 4.
All costs are allocated to flow or suspended solids (SS). None are allocated at this time
to the other major strength parameter, biochemical oxygen (BOD) because the Metro
System currently has no secondary treatment and hence no costs related to BOD.
In accordance with the Point Lorna Revenue Program and as presented in Tables I and
2, Metro O&M costs are allocated 51.8 percent to flow and 48.2 percent to suspended
solids. Replacement, rehabilitation, and betterment costs are all allocated at 74.0 percent
to flow and 26.0 percent to suspended solids.
The line items in Tables 1 and 2 are those used by the City of San Diego with the
exception of the "Internal Debt Service to the Metro Sinking Fund," which represent
funds that Chula Vista is earmarking to partially offset anticipated additional payments
to the Metro system for Clean Water Program upgrade projects, commencing with the
1992-93 fiscal year.
The costs collected by the Spring Valley Sanitation District are included as part of the
Metro Operation and Maintenance Costs and Metro 1 Betterment costs for Pre-Annexation
Chula Vista.
As presented in Tables 3 and 4 all costs associated with the operation, maintenance, and
administration of the City of Chula Vista collection and conveyance system are entirely
allocable to flow. A unit cost for each of these parameters is developed based on total
wastewater flow and suspended solids loadings.
-3-
City of Chula Vista
Wastewater Rate Plan and Revenue Program
NON-RATE REVENUES
Historically, the primary sources of revenues for Chula Vista's sewer utility has been the
sewer service charges and Sewerage Facility Participation Fees. Investment Earnings and
miscellaneous fees account for other sources. The Sewer Service Charges are developed
as a result of this study. Sources of revenues other than sewer services charges are not
contingent upon the costs of operating and maintaining the system and are presented by
fund in Table 5. For purposes of providing a conservative estimate, it is assumed that
revenues for the 1991-92 fiscal year are identical to those of 1990-91 with the exception
of Sewerage Facility Participation Fees. The Sewerage Facility Participation Fee is
deposited in Fund 222, the Trunk Sewer Capacity Reserve Fund represents the amount
the City projects will be collected from new users to the system. The decrease from $2.1
million to approximately $1.1 million is anticipated because of a decline in the new
residential construction and the assumption of limitations on new water hook-ups due to
the severity of the drought afflicting California. The Non-Rate Revenues are allocated
based on the same parameters as the costs of Tables 1 through 4 and are presented in
Table 6.
According to SWRCB guidelines, Sewer Service Charges, interest on the Sewer Service
Revenue Funds, and miscellaneous fees related to the operation and maintenance of the
wastewater enterprise must be sufficient to at least cover operations and maintenance
expenses. Any remaining funds can be applied to capital projects. Sewer Participation
Fees and interest on non-operating funds can only be applied to capital projects.
USER CLASSES
As presented in Table 7, the proposed user classes include residential, low-strength
commercial (less than 200 mg/l SS), medium-strength commercial (200 through 499 mg/l
SS), high strength commercial (greater than 500 mg/l SS), and other categories, which
include high volume users (wastewater discharge greater than 25,000 gpd) and septage,
whose rates are determined individually. The pollutant concentrations for these classes
of users are taken from the SWRCB Revenue Program Guidelines. Any commercial
establishment that cannot reasonably be assigned to one of these categories is identified
as "Basic Commercial." For large users that sample wastewater discharge, the sampling
results are used in lieu of the SWRCB estimates.
The City of Chula Vista reports six high volume users within the City: Community
Hospital of Chula Vista, Prudential Overall Supply, Rohr Industries, Scripps Memorial
Hospital, Southwestern College, and Vista Hill Hospital.
When the Metro System begins to incur charges related to BOD, upon start-up of
secondary treatment facilities, the commercial categories will be redefined. The pollutant
concentrations are taken from the SWRCB Revenue Program Guidelines. Any
commercial establishment that cannot reasonably be assigned to one of these categories
-4-
City of Chula Vista
Wastewater Rate Plan and Revenue Program
is identified as "Basic Commercial", which falls within the "Low Strength" category. The
number of each type of commercial establishment within the City is listed in City of
Chula Vista Document CP403, "Land Use Inventory Detail Totals BJf RLUC/Assessor No.
Sequence."
LOW-INCOME USERS
The SWRCB allows charges to low-income single family users to be reduced if certain
conditions are met. The reduction must be based strictly on income and not age or
handicap status. The City must establish what the maximum income level that qualifies
and the percent reduction from regular single family users. Applicants seeking relief must
provide proof of annual income. The reduction in revenue must be absorbed by all other
users.
The City of Chula Vista reports 293 low-income households, all located in the Pre-
Annexation Area. The City maintains a 30 percent reduction below the regular single
family charge. No low income users for the Montgomery Area are shown because
residents were not previously eligible for the reduction. However, the recommended rates
below contain a low-income rate in case any are approved in the coming fiscal year.
BILLINGS
Sewer service charges for the Pre-Annexation Area are collected on the user's water bill
by either the Otay Water District or the Sweetwater Authority. The Montgomery Area
service charges have been and continue to be collected by the San Diego County Tax
Assessor on the property tax rolls. City staff is currently examining alternative means of
collecting service charges.
REVENUE PROGRAM FORMS
A description of the assumptions and methodqlogy behind the development of the forms
is presented in this section. Not all of the line items cited in the original forms prepared
by the SWRCB are present because Chula Vista is a subscribing agency to a grant
recipient and was not responsible for the construction or operation of the grant funded
projects. For reasons discussed above, no allocations are made to BOD.
SWRCB Form I--Summary of User and Wastewater Characteristics (Table 8)
For the Pre-Annexation Area, the numbers of single family residences (SFRs) and multi-
family units are reported by the Otay Water District, Sweetwater Authority, and the
California American Water Company.
-5-
City of Chula Vista
Wastewater Rate Plan and Revenue Program
None of the water purveyors distinguish among types of commercial accounts. The City's
land use report distinguishes among the types of commercial establishments. The relative
number of commercial users and their respective flows is estimated by applying the
percentage of all commercial accounts that each category represents to the number of
accounts and volume of flows in the commercial category reported by Otay and
Sweetwater. The percentages are as follows: Low-Strength Commercial 82.7 percent,
Medium Strength Commercial 9.3 percent, and High Strength Commercial 8.0 percent of
the almost 4,600 commercial establishments in Chula Vista. The determination of the
user class is derived from City planning documents, which describe the type of business
on each parcel of land within the City.
A flow of 220 gallons per day per Single Family Residence (SFR) is assumed. This flow
rate represents a reduction from past estimates, reflecting the community's water
conservation efforts and is consistent with the reduced flows recorded in the City's flow
monitoring reports and with other communities in San Diego County. It is assumed that
each apartment unit generates 75 percent of the wastewater as a SFR, or 165 gallons per
day. For each of the other categories, it is assumed that 90 percent of the average annual
water consumption (as reported for the most recent 12-month period by Otay and
Sweetwater) is discharged to the sewer system. The strength of residential wastewater
is assumed to be 200 mg/l each for BOD and suspended solids. The strength of the
commercial categories represent the flow-weighted average of the various categories
within each class presented in Table 7. The remainder of the form is self-evident, with
the indicated columns representing the product of preceding columns. The resulting
wastewater flow for the Pre-Annexation Area is 10041 MOD.
The same approach is employed for the Montgomery Area where an estimated 2.36 MOD
of wastewater is generated.
SWRCB Form 2--0perations and Maintenance Costs and Debt Service (Table 9)
This form summarizes elements of Tables 1 through 4. The payments to the Metro
System include only the operation and maintenance components of the Metro costs. The
capital component is presented in Table 10 (SWRCB Form 3).
The operating reserve line item in the "3. Other" category represents the anticipated
excess of revenues over expenditures of the various capital improvement funds budgeted
for the 1991-92 fiscal year. The reserve fund increases are detailed in Table 11.
SWRCB Form 3--Capital Costs Allocations (Table 10)
All of the capital improvements contemplated by the City of Chula Vista involve parallel
sewer construction and other projects related to capacity expansion. Replacement and
rehabilitation projects are not considered here, as they are part of operation and
-6-
City of Chula Vista
Wastewater Rate Plan and Revenue Program
maintenance. The Metro capital projects include payments Chula Vista will make to
Metro and the Internal Debt Service that Chula Vista contributes to its own funds for
future Metro capital improvement payments.
SWRCB Form 4..Unit Cost Determination (Table 12)
This form summarizes all the costs categories and breaks them down into unit costs per
million gallons per day (MOD) of wastewater flow or per pound per day (ppd) of
suspended solids. Capital Outlay and Debt Service are described above. The Capital
Outlay portion pertains strictly to collection and conveyance equipment and are allocated
solely to flow. The O&M costs are derived from Tables 2 and 4 and Table 9 (SWRCB
Form 2). The Non-Rate Revenue represents the sum of investment earnings,
miscellaneous income and sewer facility participation fees (connection fees). These
revenues must also be allocated to flow and suspended solids and be deducted from the
total costs to determine the revenue requirements, as presented in Table 6. The capacity
payments should be maintained in the Trunk Sewer Capacity Reserve Fund and applied
only towards expansion related projects, such as construction of parallel sewers or
payment towards additional capacity in the Metro System over and above what Chula
Vista currently utilizes. The Net Revenue Requirement represents the estimated amount
of funds that must be raised from users in the 1991-92 fiscal year. The unit costs will
be applied to the estimated flow and suspended loadings of each class to determine an
overall rate.
SWRCB Form 5--Summary of Fund Costs (Table 13)
The unit costs are taken directly from Item 7, Column 5 in Table 12 (SWRCB Form 4).
They are multiplied by the relevant wastewater flow or solids loading to yield a class total
and average rate per unit flow of wastewater generated. To translate these rates to a
charge per unit of water consumed, the rate must be multiplied by the proportion of water
consumed that is discharged to the sewer, which is estimated at 90 percent for both
commercial and multi-family establishments.
SWRCB Form 6.. Total Revenue (Table 14)
This form allocates the cost and revenue categories from Table 12 (SWRCB Form 4) to
the various user classes.
-7-
City of Chula Vista
Wastewater Rate Plan and Revenue Program
RATE RECOMMENDATIONS
Table 15 translates the rates from Table 13 (SWRCB Form 5) and Table 14 (SWRCB
Form 6) to the units that the City utilizes in the Sewer Service Charges. For the 1991-92
fiscal year, the City will continue to assess flat rates for single family residential units.
In the Montgomery Area, multi-family charges will also be assessed a flat rate. All other
users will receive variable charges based on the volume of water consumed. Single
Family Residence charges are stated in dollars per month for the Pre-Annexation Area
and dollars per year for the Montgomery Area because the Pre-Annexation Area Sewer
Service Charges are collected with the monthly or bi-monthly water bills, while the
Montgomery Area receipts are collected annually on the County Tax Rolls.
This model can very easily determine what the variable charge would be for single family
residences once a sewer discharge factor is estimated. For example, if it is assumed that
75 percent of the water consumed is discharged to the sewer, the average unit costs from
Table 13 (SWRCB Form 5) would be multiplied by 0.75, yielding a sewer charge in the
Pre-Annexation Area of $1.02 per hundred cubic feet (hcf) of water consumed for regular
customers and $O.72/HCF for low-income users. In the Montgomery Area, the charges
would be $O.92/hcf and $O.64/hcf for regular and low-income users, respectively.
The rates in Table 15 should be adopted by the City to ensure that sufficient revenues are
raised to operate and maintain the City's wastewater collection and conveyance system
and to make the payments to the City of San Diego for use of the Metro System. These
charges are largely consistent with projections made by City staff in July 1990 of single
family Sewer Service Charges for the 1991-92 fiscal year. These projections anticipated
a 16.5 percent increase from $10.41 to $12.13 per month for Pre-Annexation Chula Vista
and a 30.2 percent increase from $8.35 to $10.87 for the Montgomery Area. The
recommended increases in charges for multi-family and commercial/industrial users are
substantially higher. These proportionately higher charges are a result of applying the fair
and equitable guidelines of the SWRCB by allocating charges to both flow and strength.
-8-
Table 1
'CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COST ALLOCATION
fiscaL Year 1990-91
Assumed FLows (MGD)
Pre-Annex. Chula Vista
Montgomery Area
10.41
2.36
FLow
Altocation
Percentage Amount
Suspended Solids
Allocation
Percentage
Amount
Total
San OieQo Metro Costs
Pre-Annexation Chula Vista Area
Capital Projects
Fixed Capacity Charges
CUP Upgrade Costs
CUP Upgrade Costs Reduced by Debt Service
CWP Proposed Debt Service
CUP Front Funding Payback
Metro I Betterment Costs
Internal Debt Service to Metro Sinking Fund
Subtotal--Capital
o & M Expenses
Subtotal--Metro Casts (Pre-Annexation CV)
Montgomery Area
Capital Projects
74.0:1: 131,483 26.0% 46,197 177,679
74.0% 6,277,396 26.0% 2,205,572 8,482,967
74.0:1: 0 26.0% 0 0
74.0:1: 0 26.0:1: 0 0
74.0:1: (6,706,826) 26.0:1: (2,356,452) (9,063,278)
74.0:1: 320,701 26.0% 112,679 433,380
74.0:1: 782,180 26.0% 274,820 1,057,000
74.0% 804,934 26.0% 282,815 1,087,749
51.8:1: 1,083,692 48.2% 1,008,377 2,092,069
59.4:1: 1,888,626 40.6% 1,291,192 3,179,818
Fixed Capacity Charges 74.0% 29,837 26.0% 10,483 40,321
CUP Upgrade Costs 74.0% 1,424,524 26.0% 500,508 1,925,033
CUP Upgrade Costs Reduced by Debt Servi ce 74.0% 0 26.0% 0 0
C~P Proposed Debt Service 74.0% 0 26.0% 0 0
C~P Front Funding Payback 74.0% (1,521,974) 26.0% (534,748) (2,056,722 )
Metro I Betterment Costs 74.0:1: 71,270 26.0% 25,041 96,311
Internal Debt Service to Metro Sinking Fund 74.0% 133,200 26.0% 46,800 180,000
Subtotal--Capital 74.0% 136,857 26.0:1: 48,085 184,942
o & M Expenses 51.8:1: 239,535 48.2% 222,887 462,422
Subtota l- -Metro Costs (Montgomery Area) 58.1% 376,391 41.9% 270,972 647,364
04/12/91
-9-
Table 1
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COST ALLOCATION
Fiscal Ye.r 1990-91
~ Flows (MGO)
Pre.Annex. ChuLa Vista
Montgomery Area
10.41
2.36
Flow
ALlocation
Percentage Amount
Suspended Solids
Allocation
Percentage
Amount
Total
Combined Metro System Costs
Capital pr~jects
Fixed Capacity Charges
CYP Upgrade Costs
CYP Upgrade Costs Reduced by Debt Service
CYP Proposed Debt Service
CYP Front Funding Payback
Metro I Betterment Costs
Internal Debt Service to Metro Sinking Fund
Subtotal--Capital
o & M Expenses
Total--Metro Charges
74.0X 161,320 26.0X 56,6BO 21B,OOO
74.0X 7,701,920 26.0X 2,706, OBO 10,40B,OOO
74.0X 0 26.0X 0 0
74.0X 0 26.0X 0 0
74.0X (B,22B,BOO) 26.0X (2,B91,200)(11,120,OOO)
74.0X 391,971 26.0X 137,719 529,"690
74.0X 915,3BO 26.0X 321,620 1,237,000
6B.7X 1,318,182 31.3X 601,872 1,920,054
51.8X 1,323,226 4B.2X 1,231,265 2,554,491
59.0X 2,641,409 41.0X 1 ,B33, 136 4,474,545
04/12/91
-1()"
Table 2
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COST ALLOCATION
Fiscal Year 1991-92
~ Flows ~
Pre.Annex. Chula Vista 10.41
Montgomery Area 2.36
Flow
Allocation
Percentage Amount
Suspended Solids
Allocation
Percentage Amount
Total
i20 0 i eQO !itl!:2 f2lli
Pre-Annexation Chula Vista Area
Capital Projects
Fixed Capacity Charges
CUP Upgrade Costs
CUP Upgrade Costs Reduced by Debt Service
CUP Proposed Debt Service
CUP Front Funding Payback
Metro I Betterment Costs
InternaL Debt Service to Metro Sinking Fund
Subtotal..Capital
o & M Expenses
Subtotal--Metro Costs (Pre-Annexation CV)
Montgomery Area
Capital Projects
74.0X 131,483 26.0X 46,197 177,679
74.0X 4,307,567 26.0X 1,513,470 5,821,037
74.0X 0 26.0X 0 0
74.0X 0 26.0X 0 0
74.0X (4,848,577) 26.0X (1,703,554) (6,552,131)
74.0X 354,185 26.0X 124,443 478,628
74.0X 2,146,000 26.0X 754,000 2,900,000
74.0X 2,090,658 26.0X 734,556 2,825,214
51.8X 1,058,077 48.2X 984,543 2,042,620
64.n 3,148,736 35.3X 1,719,099 4,867,834
Fixed Capacity Charges 74.0X 29,837 26.0X 10,483 40,321
CUP Upgrade Costs 74.0X 977,513 26.0% 343,450 1,320,963
cup Upgrade Costs Reduced by Debt Service 74.0% 0 26.0% 0 0
CUP Proposed Debt Service 74.0% 0 26.0X 0 0
CUP Front Funding Payback 74.0% (1,100,283) 26.0% (386,586) (1,486,869)
Metro I Betterment Costs 74.0X 78,711 26.0% 27,655 106,366
Internal Debt Service to Metro Sinking Fund 74.0% 421,800 26.0X 148,200 570,000
Subtotal..Capital 74.0X 407,577 26.0% 143,203 550,780
o & M Expenses 51.8% 235,138 48.2X 218,796 453,934
Subtotal--Metro Costs (Montgomery Area) 64.0X 642,715 36.0% 361,999 1,004,714
04/12/91
-11.-
Table 2
CtTY OF CHUlA VISTA
COST ALLOCATION
Fiscal Year 1991.92
Assumed Flows iMllill
Pre-Annex. Chule Vista 10.41
Montgomery Area 2.36
Flow
ALLocation
Percentage Amount
Suspended Sol ids
Allocation
Percentage
Amount
TotaL
Combined Metro System Costs
Capital Projects
Fixed Capacity Charges
CYP Upgrade Costs
CWP Upgrade Costs Reduced-by Debt Service
CYP Proposed Oebt Service
CWP Front Funding Payback
Metro J Betterment Costs
Internal Debt Service to Metro Sinking Fund
Subtotal--Capital
o & M Expenses
Total--Metro Charges
74.0% 161,320 26.0% 56,680 218,000
74.0% 5,285,080 26.0% 1,856,920 7,142,000
74.0% 0 26.0% 0 0
74.0% 0 26.0% 0 0
74.0% (5,948,860) 26.0% (2,090;140) (8,039,000)
74.0% 432,896 26.0% 152,099 584,994
74.0% 2,567,800 26.0% 902,200 3,470,000
71. 7X 3,140,951 28.3% 1,239,758 4,380,709
51.8% , ,293,215 48.2% 1,203,339 2,496,555
64.5% 4,434,166 35.5% 2,443,097 6,877,263
04/12/91
-12-
Table 3
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COST ALLOCATION
Fiscal Year 1990-91
~ Flows ~
Pre-Annex. Chula Vista
Montgomery Area
10.41
2.36
Flew
Allocation
Percentage Amount
Suspended Solids
Allocation
Percentage Amount
TotaL
Citv of Chula Vista Collection System ~
Pre-Annexation Chula Vista Area
Capital Improvements
Sewer Income Fund
Special Sewer Fund
Trunk Sewer Fund
Subtotal Capital
OM&R
Sewer Service Revenue Fund
Sewer Facilities Replacement Fund
Subtotal OM&R
Subtotal Pre-Annexation Chula Vista Area
Montgomery Area
Montgomery Sewer Service Revenue Fund
Montgomery Sewer RepLacement Fund
SubtotaL Montgomery Area
Total City of Chula Vista Collection Costs
100.0%
100.0%
100.0%
o
73,400
627,300
700,700
100.0% 1,995,674
100.0% 454,146
100.0% 2,449,820
100.0% 3,150,520
100.0%
100.0%
452,908
65,854
100.0%
518,762
100.0% 3,669,282
-13-
0.0%
0.0%
0.0%
o
o
o
o
73,400
627,300
o
700,700
0.0%
0.0%
o 1,995,674
o 454,146
0.0%
o 2,449,820
0.0%
o 3,150,520
0.0%
0.0%
o
o
452,908
65,854
0.0%
o
518,762
0.0%
o 3,669,282
04/12/91
Table 4
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
COST ALLOCATION
Fiscal Year 1991-92
Assumed Flows .illQQl
Pre-Annex. Chula Vista
Montgomery Area
10.41
2.36
Flow
Allocation
Suspended Solids
Allocation
Percentage Amount Percentage
Amount
TotaL
City of Chute Vista Collection System ~
Pre-Annexation Chula Vista Area
Capital Improvements
Sewer Income Fund 100.0X 0 O.OX 0 0
Special Sewer Fund 100.0X 0 0.0% 0 0
Trunk Sewer Fund 100.0% 700,000 O.OX 0 700,000
SubtotaL Capital 700,000 0 700,000
OM&R
Sewer Service Revenue Fund 100.0% 1,804,003 0.0% 0 1,804,003
Sewer Faci l ities Replacement Fund 100.0% 572,706 0.0% 0 572,706
Subtotal OM&R 100.0% 2,376,709 0.0% 0 2,376,709
Subtotal Pre-Annexation Chula Vista Area 100.0% 3,076,709 0.0% 0 3,076,709
Montgomery Area
Montgomery Sewer Service Revenue Fund 100.0% 395,302 0.0% 0 395,302
Montgomery Sewer Replacement Fund 100.0% 65,854 0.0% 0 65,854
SubtotaL Montgomery Area 100.0% 461,155 0.0% 0 461,155
Total City of Chula Vista Collection Costs 100.0% 3,537,865 0.0% 0 3,537,865
04/12/91
-14.
Table 5
NON-RATE REVENUES
1990-91
Budgeted
1991-92
220 Sewer Income Fund
3501 Investment Earnings
3521 Sewer Repayment Fees
3771 Sewer Income Assessments
4022 Sewer Repayment Fee~Contractor
4023 Sewer Repayment Fee~Rice Canyon
Fund Total
221 Special Sewer Fund
3501 Investment Earnings
3813 Sale of Metro Capacity Rights
Fund TotaL
222 Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve Fund
3501 Investment Earnings
3762 Sewerage FaciLity Participation Fee
3853 Reimbursement Other Agency
47,000
5,000
o
10,000
20,000
82,000
49,000
110,400
159,400
359,000
2,100,000
o
47,000
5,000
o
10,000
20,000
82,000
49,000
1'0,400
159,400
359,000
1,110,000
o
223 Montgomery Sewer Service Revenue Fund
Fund Total 2,459,000 1,469,000
3501 Investment Earnings
3860 District Assessments
4098 Other Non-Revenue Receipts
Metro Rebates
Fund Total
-15-
74,000
o
o
328,362
402,362
72,000
o
o
o
72,000
04/12/91
Table 5
NON-RATE REVENUES
1990-91 1991-92
Budgeted
224 Montgomery Sewer Replacement Fund
3501 Investment Earnings 74,000 74,000
74,000 74,000
225 Sewer Service Revenue Fund
3501 Investment Earnings 312,000 310,000
3860 District Assessments 0 0
4096 P.Y. Revenue/Bank Racon Adj 0 0
4098 Other Non-Revenue Receipts 1,000 1,000
Metro Rebate 425,594 0
Fund Total 738,594 3'1,000
226 Sewer FaciLity Replacement Fund
3501 Investment Earnings 49,000 49,000
Fund Total 49,000 49,000
Total for All Funds 3,964,356 2,216,400
04/12/91
-16-
Table 5
NON-RATE REVENUES
1990-91
Budgeted
1991-92
SlITmary
200 Sewer Income Fund
221 Special Sewer Fund
222 Trunk Sewer CapitaL Reserve Fund
223 Montgomery Sewer Maintenance Fund
224 Montgomery Sewer Replacement/Expansio
225 Sewer Service Revenue Fund
226 Sewer Replacement Fund
82,000
159,400
2,459,000
402,362
74,000
738,594
49,000
82,000
159,400
1,469,000
72,000
74,000
311,000
49,000
3,964,356 2,216,400
-17.'
04/12/91
Table 6
NON-RATE REVENUE ALLOCATION
Fiscal Year 1991-92
Flow Suspended Solids
Allocatlon Allocation
Percentage Amount Percentage Amount Total
Pre-Annexation Area
Sewer Income Fund 100.0% 82,000 0.0% 0 82,000
Special Sewer Fund 100.0% 159,400 0.0% 0 159,400
Trunk Sewer Fund 100.0% 1,469,000 0.0% 0 1,469,000
Sewer Service Revenue Fund 80.8% 251,297 19.2% 59,703 311,000
Sewer Facilities Replacement Fund 80.8% 39,593 19.2% 9,407 49,000
96.7% 2,001,290 3.3% 69,110 2,070,400
Montgomery Area
Montgomery Sewer Service Fund 76.5% 55,074 23.5% 16,926 72,000
Montgomery Sewer Replacement 100.0% 74,000 0.0% 0 74,000
88.4% 129,074 11.6% 16,926 146,000
Total Non-Rate Revenue 96.1% 2,130,364 3.9% 86,036 2,216,400
05/09/91
-18-
Table 7
PROPOSED USER CLASSIFICATIONS AND
ASSUMED POLLUTANT CONCENTRATIONS
BOD
<ppml
SS
<ppm>
User Classification
Residential
200
200
Low-StrenQth Commercial
Basic Commercial
Car Wash
Department & Retail Stores
Hotels w/o Dining Facilities
Hospital & ConvaLescent
Laundromat
Professional Office
School & College
Soft Water Service
150
20
150
310
250
150
130
130
3
150
150
150
120
100
110
80
100
55
Medium-StrenQth Commercial
Bars w/o Dining Facilities
Commercial Laundry
Repair Shop & Service Station
Shopping Center
200
450
180
400
200
240
280
432
Hiqh-StrenQth Commercial
Auto Steam Cleaning
Bakery, Wholesale
Hotel with Dining Facilities
Industrial Laundry
MOf'tuaries
Restaurant
Supermarkets
1,150
1,000
500
670
800
1;000
800
1,250
600
600
680
800
600
800
Other
Sept age
5,400 12,000
-19-
Table 8
FORM 1
City of Chula Vista (Pre~Annexation Area)
Fiscal Year 1991-92
05/08/91
Summary of Users and ~astewater Characteristics
User Groups
ADWF BOO
MOD MO/L
DES I ON CAPACITY
DESIGN BOO
FLOW LBS/DAY
MOD (DxFx 8.34)
SS
LBS/DAY
(ExFx 8.34)
VOLUME
MO
(Cx365)
TOTAL ANNUAL
BOO
LBS
(CxDx3044)
CAPAC ITY
SS
LBS
(CxEx3044 )
WASTEWA1ER CHARAC1ERISTICS
Numer
of
Users
SS
MO/L
24,122 SingLe Family Residential 5.3068 200 200 5.3068 8,852 8,852 1,937 3,230,804 3,230,804
293 Low-Income Residential 0.0645 200 200 0.0645 108 108 24 39,243 39,243
16,642 Multi-Family Residential (Units) 2.7459 200 200 2.7459 4,580 4,580 1,002 1,671,722 1,671,722
2,853 low Strength Commercial 1. 4886 146 125 1. 4886 1,813 1,552 543 661,570 566,412
, 321 Medium Strength Commercial 0.1674 265 0.1674
'" 300 370 419 61 135,035 152,870
0
, 276 High Strength Commercial 0.1440 978 622 0.1440 1,175 747 53 428,693 272,645
1 Community HospitaL of CV 0.0481 250 100 0.0481 100 40 18 36,610 14,644
1 Prudential OveralL Supply 0.0265 3,575 1,430 0.0265 789 316 10 287,946 115,178
1 Rohr Industries 0.2482 440 142 0.2482 911 294 91 332,456 107,293
1 Scripps Memorial HospitaL 0.0271 250 100 0.0271 57 23 10 20,631 8,252
1 Southwestern College 0.1173 250 82 0.1173 245 80 43 89,249 29,274
1 Vista Hill Hospital 0.0226 250 100 0.0226 47 19 8 17,226 6,891
44,513 Total 10.4070 219 196 10.4070 19,045 17,029 3,799 6,951,185 6,215,228
05/08/91
FORM 1M
Table 8/-1
City of Chula Vista (Montgomery Area)
Fiscal Year 1991-92
04/11/91
Summary of Users and Yastewater Characteristics
WASTEWATER CHARACTERISTICS
User Groups
ADWF BOD
MGD MG/L
DESIGN CAPACITY
DESIGN BOD
FLOW LBS/OA Y
MGO (DxFx 8.34)
SS
LBS/OAY
(ExFx 8.34)
VOLUME
MG
(Cx365 )
TOTAL ANNUAL
BOD
LBS
<CxOx3044)
CAPAC ITY
SS
LBS
(CxEx3044)
Nunber
of
Users
SS
MG/L
3,756 Single Famlly Residential 0.83 200 200 0.83 1,378 1,378 302 503,064 503,064
3,305 MuLti-family Residential (Units) 0.55 200 200 0.55 910 910 199 331,994 331,994
1,031 low Strength Commercial 0.82 146 125 0.82 997 854 299 363,863 311,527
, 116 Medium Strength Commercial 0.09 265 300 0.09 203 230 34 74,269 84,078
'"
~ 100 High Strength Commercial 0.08 978 622 0.08 646 411 29 235,7Bl 149,955
,
8,308 Total
2.36
48
44
2.36
4,134
3,783
862 1,50B,971 1,380,617
Table 9
FORM 2
City of Chula Vista
(Pre-Annexation Area)
Operation and Maintenance Costs and Debt Service
04/12/91
COST CATEGORY CURRENT YEAR ESTIMATED COST
1990-91 1991-92
1_ TREATMENT FACILITIES (City of Chula Vista portion of San Diego Metro Costs)
2,092,069 2,042,620
2. COLLECTION SYSTEM
O&M 1,501,928 1,285,570
Replacement Costs 454,146 572,706
SUBTOTAL 1,956,074 1,858,276
3. OTHER
Administrative Support 493,746 518,433
Reserve Fund Increases 529,700 1,010,400
Other 0 0
SUBTOTAL 1,023,446 1,528,833
4. TOTAL O&M COSTS 5,071,589 5,429,730
5. DEBT SERVICE
PRINCIPAL & INTEREST 0 0
5,071,589 5,429,730
-22-
Table 9~1
fORM 2tl
City of Chula Vista
(Montgomery Area)
Operation and Maintenance Costs and Debt Service
04/12/91
COST CATEGORY
CURRENT YEAR
1990-91
ESTIMATED COST
1991-92
1_ TREATMENT fACILITIES (City of Chula Vista portion of San Diego Metro CostS)
462,422 453,934
2. COLLECTION SYSTEM
o&M 348,903 286,096
Replacement Costs 65,854 65,854
SUBTOTAL 414,757 351,950
3. OTHER
Administrative Support 104,005 109,205
Reserve Fund Increases 74,000 74,000
Other 0 0
- -
SUBTOTAL 178,005 183,205
4. TOTAL o&M COSTS 1,055,184 989,090
5. DEBT SERVICE
PRINCIPAL & INTEREST 0 0
1,055,184 989,090
-23-
Table 10
FORM 3
Capital Cost Allocation
City of Chula Vista (Pre-Annexation Area)
Fiscal Year 1991-92
TOTAL
COST FLOW BOD SS
$ % $ % $ % $
COSTS:
COLLECTION SYSTEM 700,000 100.0% 700,000 0.0% 0 0.0% 0
2 TREATMENT PLANT 2,825,214 74.0% 2,090,658 0 0 26.0% 734,556
3 OLTFALL/INTERCEPT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
7 SUBTOTAL - ALL COSTS 3,525,214 79.2% 2,790,658 0 0 20.8% 734,556
-24-
Table lOH
FORM VI
Capital Cost Allocation
City of Chula Vista (Montgomery Area)
Fiscal Year 1991-92
04/11/91
TOTAL
COST FLOW BOD SS
% $ % $ % $
COSTS:
1 COLLECTION SYSTEM 65,854 100.0% 65,854 0.0% 0 0.0% 0
2 TREATMENT PLANT 550,780 74.0% 407,577 0 0 26.0% 143,203
3 OUTFALL/INTERCEPT 0 0.0% 0 0 0 0 0
7 SUBTOTAL - ALL COSTS 616,634 76.8% 473,431 0 0 23.2% 143.203
-25-
Table 11
Reserve Fund Increases
1990-91
Budgeted
1991-92
Pre.Annexation Chula Vista
220 Sewer Income Fund
221 Special Sewer Fund
222 Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve Fund
225 Sewer Service Revenue Fund
226 Sewer Service RepLacement Fund
Subtotal..Pre-Annexation Chula Vista
Montgomery Area
223 Montgomery Sewer Service Fund
224 Montgomery Sewer Replacement/Expansion Fund
Subtotal.-Montgomery Area
8,600 82,000
159,400 159,400
361,700 769,000
0 0
0 0
529,700 1,010,400
o
74,000
o
74,000
74,000
74,000
-26-
04/12/91
Table 12
FORM 4 City of Chula Vista (Pre-Annexation Area)
Unit Cost Determination Fiscal Year 1991-92
04/11/91
Parameter Annual Cost Total Unit Costs
At Location At Located Quantities For Each
Cost Category Percentages to Each (MGD or ppd) Parameter
Parameter
1. CAPITAL OUTLAY
Flow 79.2X 2,790,658 10.41 $268,153 per MGO
BOD O.OX 0 19,045 0
SS 20.8X 734,556 17,029 43
3,525,214
2. OEBT SERVICE
FLow O.OX 0 10.41 $0 per MGD
BOO O.OX 0 19,045 0
SS O.OX 0 17,029 0 per ppd
0
3. O&M
Flow n.n 3,434,787 10.41 330,047 per MGD
BOD O.OX 0 19,045 0
SS 22.3X 984,543 17,029 57.8171 per ppd
4,419,330
4. RESERVE FUNDS
FLow 100.0X 1,010,400 10.41 97,089 per MGD
BOO 0 0 19,045 0
SS O.OX 0 17,029 0.0000 per ppd
1,010,400
5. TOTAL
Flow 80.8X 7,235,845 10.41 695,288 per MGD
BOD O.OX 0 19,045 0
SS 19.2X 1,719,099 17,029 100.9537 per ppd
8,954,944
6. NON-RATE REVENUE
Flow 96.n 2,001,290 10.41 192,303 per MGD
BOD O.OX 0 19,045 0
SS 3.3X 69,110 17,029 4.0585 per ppd
2,070,400
7. NET RATE REVENUE REQUIREMENT
Flow 76.0X 5,234,555 10.41 502,985 per MGO
BOO O.OX (0) 19,045 (0)
SS 24.0X 1,649,989 17,029 96.8953 per ppd
6,884,544
-27-
Table 12H
FORM 41\ City of Chula Vista (Montgomery Area)
Unit Cost Determination Fiscal Year 1991-92
04/11/91
Parameter Annual Cost Total Unit Costs
ALLocation Allocated Quantities For Each
Cost Category Percentages to Each (MGD or ppd) Parameter
Parameter
1. CAPITAL OUTLAY
FLow 76.8% 473,431 2.36 $200,467 per MGD
BOO 0.0% 0 4,134 0
SS 23.2% 143,203 3,783 38
616,634
2. DEBT SERVICE
Flow 0.0% 0 2.36 $0 per MGO
BOO 0.0% 0 4,134 0
SS 0.0% 0 3,783 0
0
3. O&M
Flow 74.2% 630,439 2.36 266,949 per MGD
BOO 0.0% 0 4,134 0
SS 25.8% 218,796 3,783 57.8422 per ppd
849,236
4. RESERVE FUNDS
Flow 100.0% 74,000 2.36 31,334 per MGO
BOO 0 0 4,134 0
SS 0.0% 0 3,783 0.0000 per ppd
74,000
5. TOTAL
Flow 76.5% 1,177,871 2.36 498,750 per MGO
BOO 0.0% 0 4,134 0
SS 23.5% 361,999 3,7B3 95.7002 per ppd
100.0% 1,539,870
6. NON-RATE REVENUE
FLow 88.4% 129,074 2.36 54,654 per MGD
BOO 0.0% 0 4,134 0
SS 11.6% 16,926 3,783 4.4747 per ppd
100.0% 146,000
7. NET RATE REVENUE REQUIREMENT
FLow 75.2% 1,048,797 2.36 444,096 per MGD
BOO 0.0% 0 4,134 0
SS 24.8% 345,073 3,783 91.2255 per ppd
100.0% 1,393,870
-28-
Table 13
FORM 5
City of Chula Vista (Pre-Annexation Area)
Summary of Fund Costs
05/08/91
N..wer
of
Users
User Group
FlOY BOO
Unit Cost= $502,985 Unit Cost
ss
o Unit Cost = S96.90
Total
Average Unit Cost:
(S/hcf)
MGD
S
PPO
S
PPD
S
S
24,122 Single Family Residential 5.3068 2,674,223 8,852 0 8,852 859,323 3,533,546 1.36
293 low Income Residential 0.0645 22, 756 108 0 108 7,312 30,068 0.96
,
16,642 Multi-Family ResidentiaL (Units) 2.7459 1,383,729 4,580 0 4,580 444,641 1,828,371 1.36
2,853 Low Strength Commercial 1.4886 750, 135 1,813 0 1,552 150,653 900,789 1.24
, 321 Medium Strength Commercial 0.1674 84,356 370 0 419 40,660 125,016 1.53
ll:l 276 High Strength Commercial 0.1440 72,564 1,175 0 747 72,518 145,082 2.06
,
1 Community Hospital of tV 0.0481 24,224 100 0 40 3,895 28,119 1.20
1 Prudential Overall Supply 0.0265 13,334 789 0 316 30,635 43,969 3.41
1 Rohr Industries 0.2482 125,083 911 0 294 28,537 153,621 1.27
1 Scripps Memorial Hospital 0.0271 13,651 57 0 23 2,195 15,846 1.20
1 Southwestern College 0.1173 59,099 245 0 80 7,786 66,885 1.17
1 Vista Hill Hospital 0.0226 11,398 47 0 19 1,833 13,231 1.20
10.4070 5,234,555 19,045 0 17,029 1,649,989 6,884,544 1.36
Table l3n
fORM 5"'1
City of Chula Vista (Montgomery Area)
Summary of Fund Costs
04/11/91
fLOII BOO SS
Number User Group Uni t Cost= S444,096 Unit Cost = o Unit Cost = S91.23 Total Average Uni t Cost:
of (S/het)
Users MGD S PPD S PPD S S
3,756 Single Family Residential 0.83 366,965 1,378 0 1,378 125,736 492,702 1.22
3,305 Multi-family Residential (Units) 0.55 242,177 910 0 910 82,979 325,156 1.22
1,031 Low Strength Commercial 0.82 363,595 997 0 854 77,863 441,458 1.10
116 Medium Strength Commercial 0.09 40,888 203 0 230 21,015 61,903 1.38
100 High Strength Commercial 0.08 35,172 646 0 411 37,480 72,652 1.88
'"
0
,
2.36 1,048,797
4,134
o
3,783
345,073 1,393,870
1.21
Table 14
FORM 6
City of Chula Vista (Pre~Annexation Area)
Fiscal Year 1991-92
05/09/91
Total Revenue
NUMBER
OF
USERS
USER GROUPS
METRO
RESERVE
TOTAL
EXPENDITURES
TOTAL
ANNUAL
REVENUE
REQU I REO
AVERAGE
ANNUAL
REVENUE
REQUIRED
AVERAGE
MONTHLY
REVENUE
REQU I REO
o&M
DEBT
SERVI CE
CAPITAL
OUTLAY
NON-RATE
REVENUE
24,122 SingLe Family Residential 2,267,515 0 1,808,249 516,192 4,591,956 ( 1,058,410) 3,533,546 146 12.21
293 Low Income Residential 19,295 0 15,387 4,392 39,075 (9,006) 30,068 103 8.55
16,642 Multi-Family ResidentiaL (Units) 1,173,285 0 935,646 267,094 2,376,026 (547,655) 1,828,371 110 9.16
2,853 Low Strength Commercial 582,115 0 466,983 144,795 1,193,893 (293,104) 900,789 316 26.31
321 Medium Strength Commercial 79,614 0 63,074 16,283 158,971 (33,954) 125,016 390 32.47
, 276 High Strength Commercial 90,886 0 70,970 14,007 175,863 (30,780) 145,082 526 43.80
'"
~ 1 Community Hospital of CV 18,220 0 14,649 4,676 37,544 (9,425) 28,119 28,119 2,343.29
,
1 Prudential Overall Supply 27,029 0 20,747 2,574 50,350 (6,381> 43,969 43,969 3,664.05
1 Rohr Industries 99,105 0 79,389 24,144 202,638 (49,017) 153,621 153,621 12,801.71
1 Scripps Memorial Hospital 10,267 0 8,255 2,635 21,157 (5,311> 15,846 15,846 1,320.51
1 Southwestern College 43,425 0 34,973 11,408 89,806 (22,921) 66,885 66,885 5,573.76
1 Vista Hill HospitaL 8,573 0 6,893 2,200 17,666 (4,435) 13,231 13,231 1,102.60
44,513 4,419,330 0 3,525,214 1,010,400 8,954,944 <2,070,400) 6,884,544
Table 14/\
FORM 6'"
City of Chula Vista (Montgomery Area)
fiscal Year 1991-92
04/11/91
Total Revenue
o&M
METRO
RESERVE
TOTAL
EXPEND ITURES
TOTAL
ANNUAL
REVENUE
REQUIRED
AVERAGE
ANNUAL
REVENUE
REQUIRED
AVERAGE
MONTHLY
REVENUE
REQUIRED
NUMBER
OF
USERS
USER GROUPS
DEBT
SERVICE
CAPITAL
OUTLAY
NON-RATE
REVENUE
3,756 Single Family Residential 300,3\0 0 217,829 25,892 544,031 (51,329) 492,702 \3\ 10.93
3,305 Multi-Family Residential ( 198,188 0 143,755 17,087 359,030 (33,875) 325,156 98 8.20
1,031 low Strength Commercial 267,929 0 196,44\ 25,654 490,024 (48,566) 44\,458 428 35.67
116 Medium Strength Commercial 37,903 0 27, \78 2,885 67,965 (6,063) 6\,903 534 44.48
, 100 High Strength Commercial 44,907 0 31,43\ 2,482 78,8\9 (6,167> 72,652 728 60.69
'"
'"
,
8,308
849,236
o
616,634
74,000 1,539,870
(146,000) 1,393,870
.
TABLE 15
PROPOSED SEWER SERVICE CHARGES
1991-92 FISCAL YEAR
Pre-Annexation
Chula Vista Montgomery Area
User Class $ $
Residential
Single Family 12.2l/month l3U8/year
Multiple Family 1.23/HCF 98.39/year
Low Income 8.50/month 91.83/year
Commercialllndustrial
Low Strength U2/HCF l.OO/HCF
Medium Strength l.38/HCF 1.25/HCF
High Strength 1. 86/HCF l.70/HCF
Note: HCF refers to hundred cubic feet of water consumed.
-33-
i.
I
JM\II James M. Montgomery
Consulting Engineers Inc.
-
Appendix A
APPENDIX A
COST DETAILS
1989-90 1990-91 1991-92
Actual Budgeted Projected
220 Sewer Income Fund
Depos i ts Refunded 0 2,500 0
221 Special Sewer Fund
Capital Outlay 17,355 0 0
222 Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve Fund
5410 Deposits Refunded 1,086 1,500 2,000
223 Montgomery Sewer Service Revenue Fund
5101 Salaries & Wages 0 0 0
5201 Professional Services 0 2,960 1,920
5202 Other Specialized Services * 2,568 30,940 45,934
5203 Special Contractual Services NA NA 18,300
5203 Metro Charges 531,055 948,500 434,714
5212 Printing and Binding 0 0 500
5252 Telephone & Telegraph 0 0 336
5420 Refund of Fees 1,533 0 2,000
535,156 982,400 503,704
* Fiscal 1991-92 Total includes $31,794 to Sweetwater Authority
and Otay Water District for billing and collection servies.
A-I
05/13/91
APPENDIX A
COST DETAilS
1989-90 1990-91 1991-92
ActuaL Budgeted Projected
Transfers to GeneraL Fund (labor and Materials)
1460 Sewer Maintenance
Adjusted labor 32,748 75,066 78,819
Overhead 66,489 104,005 109,205
Equipment Maintenance 9,059 16,408 17,228
Equipment Replacement Charges 11,657 12,385 13,004
MateriaLs 5,657 7,543 7,920
Dump Fees 3,505 4,515 4,741
129,115 219,922 230,918
1440 Street Maintenance 17,817 18,708 19,643
1420 Engineering Design/Construction 452 474 498
1421 Engineering Sewer 35,706 37,492 39,367
1422 Engineering land DeveLopment 3,241 3,403 3,573
1423 Sewer Design 5,554 5,831 6,123
1402 Sewer Administration 0 1,949 2,046
Insurance Transfers 0 131,229 24,144
62,770 199,086 95,393
Fund TotaL 597,926 1,401,408 830,016
224 Montgomery Sewer Replcmnt/Expnsn Fund 0 65,854 65,854
A-2
05/13/91
APPENDIX A
COST DETAILS
1989-90 1990-91 1991-92
Actual Budgeted Projected
225 Sewer Service Revenue Fund
5101 Salaries & Wages 0 0 0
5144 Salaries & Other Services 0 0 0
5201 Professional Services 0 8,280 4,440
5202 Other Specialized Services + 44,167 99,585 256,000
5203 Special Contract Services 1,980,571 4,260,605 10,650
5203 Metro Costs 0 0 1,967,834
5212 Printing and Binding 0 0 500
5223 Membership Dues 0 0 150
5224 Training-City Personnel 590 1,000 1,000
5252 Telephone & Telegraph 0 0 1,200
5266 Serv to Ma;n.Office Equip 17 210 210
5268 Serv to Main-Other Equip 17 2,150 2,500
5331 Books, Publications and Maps 0 0 150
5369 Construction Materials 0 0 0
5398 Other Commodities 422 800 4,828
5420 Refund of Fees 1,837 3,320 2,000
2,027,621 4,375,950 2,251,462
+ Fiscal 1991-92 Total includes $201,600 to Sweetwater Authority
and Otay Water District for billing and collection servies.
A-3
05/13/91
APPENDIX A
COST DETAilS
1989-90 1990-91 1991-92
Actual Budgeted Projected
225 Sewer Service Revenue Fund
5101 Salaries & Wages 0 0 0
5144 Salaries & Other Services 0 0 D
5201 Professional Services 0 8,280 4,440
5202 Other Specialized Services + 44,167 99,585 256,000
5203 SpeciaL Contract Services 1,980,571 4,260,605 10,650
5203 Metro Costs 0 0 1,967,834
5212 Printing and Binding 0 0 500
5223 Membership Dues 0 0 150
5224 Training~City Personnel 590 1,000 1,000
5252 Telephone & Telegraph 0 0 ',200
5266 Serv to Hain-Office Equip 17 210 210
5268 Serv to Main-Other Equip 17 2,150 2,500
5331 Books, Publications and Maps 0 0 150
5369 Construction Materials 0 0 0
5398 Other Commodities 422 800 4,828
5420 Refund of Fees 1,837 3,320 2,000
2,027,621 4,375,950 2,251,462
+ Fiscal 1991-92 Total includes $31,794 to Sweetwater Authority
and Otay Water District for billing and colLection servies.
A-3
05/13191
APPENDIX A
COST DETAILS
1989-90 1990-91 1991-92
Actual Budgeted Projected
Transfers to General Fund (Labor & Materials)
1460 Sewer Maintenance
Adjusted Labor 144,310 330,792 347,332
Overhead 292,994 458,313 481,229
Equipment Maintenance 39,922 72,303 75,918
Equipment Replacement Charges 51,367 54,575 57,304
Materials 24,928 33,237 34,899
Dump Fees 15,446 19,895 20,890
568,967 969,115 1,017,571
1461 Li ft Stat i on
Adjusted Labor 17,743 25,574 26,853
Overhead 36,025 35,433 37,205
Equipment Maintenance 4,909 5,590 5,869
Equipment Replacement Charges 6,316 4,219 4,430
Materials 3,065 2,570 2,698
D~ Fees 1,899 1,538 1,615
Utilities 12,340 12,350 13,585
82,296 87,274 92,255
1440 Street Maintenance 78,513 82,438 86,560
1420 Engineering Design/Construction 1,990 2,090 2,195
1421 Engineering Sewer 157,345 165,212 173,473
1422 Engineering Land Development 14,282 14,996 15,746
1423 Sewer Design 24,473 25,697 26,982
1402 Sewer Administration 8,591 8,591 9,021
Insurance Transfers 0 524,916 96,574
285,194 823,940 410,550
Capital Outlay 16,342 0 0
Fund Total 2,329,157 6,256,279 3,771,838
226 Sewer Facilities Replacement Fund
Sewer Replacement 209 163,950 268,000
Equipment Replacemnt NA 290,196 304,706
- -
209 454,146 572,706
TotaLs 2,928,169 7,661,687 4,603,854
A-4
APPENDIX A
COST DETAILS
1989-9D 199D-91 1991-92
Actual Budgeted Projected
Cacital Exoenditures
220 Sewer Income Fund
SW108 88/Sewer Manhole Step Rep 4,D3D D D
SW111 89/2nd & 3rd St Sewers 65,518 0 0
69,548 0 0
221 Special Sewer Fund
SW105 88/Sewer Rehab Phase II 0 0 0
SW113 89/TV Sewer Inspections V 125,789 0 0
SY902 TV Sewer Inspect Phases IV-VII 0 73,400 0
125,789 73,400 0
222 Trunk Sewer Capital Reserve Fund
OP1Q8 89/Master Facilities Plan 0 0 0
SY107 sa/Sewer Construction-G Street 0 0 0
SW109 88/System Upgrading-Met 154,690 250,000 0
SW200 90/Palm Cyn Basin Parallel 259,500 0 0
SW201 90/Spring Valley Outfall POCs 164,300 0 0
SW202 Parallel Sewer Const--lndustrial BL 0 206,400 0
SW203 Parallel Sewer Const.--Second Ave. 0 170,900 0
SW113 89/TV Sewer Inspections V 3,313 0 0
5109 as/Replace Sewage MTR-G 18,900 0 0
SI10 86/Sewer Meter Repl-G 18,900 0 0
SSF03 a7/Sewer Rehabilitation 0 0 0
Miscellaneous Projects 0 0 700,000
619,603 627,300 700,000
Total--Capital Projects 814,940 700,700 700,000
A-5
05/13/91
APPENDIX A
COST DETAILS
.
I
JNM James M. Montgomery
Consulting Engineers. Inc.
G
Appendix B
APPENDIX B
PARTIAL WATER USER AND
CONSUMPTION SUMMARY
APPENDIX B
PARTIAL YATER USER AND CONSUMPTION SUMMARY
Number of Average Flow
Units in MGD
Pre.Annexation Chula Vista
Dtay *
Domestic 9,109 73.42% 3.7 78.6%
PlIllp Station 126 1.02% 0.1 1.1%
Conmercial 461 3.72% 0.4 9.0%
Apartment/Condo 2,464 19.86% 0.5 9.9%
Chula Vista Woods 155 1.25% 0.0 1.1%
Low Income 15 0.12% 0.0 0.1%
Mission Verde 77 0.62% 0.0 0.2%
Total Dtay 12,407 100.00% 4.7 100.0%
Sweetwater +
Residential 14,856 84.69% 4.1 51.92%
Construction 8 0.04% 0.0 0.03%
Business 2,868 5.87% 1.1 14.03%
Industrial 22 0.03% 0.0 0.53%
Goverrvnent 85 0.56% 0.4 4.63%
Apartments 14,178 8.04% 2.0 24.58%
Agricultural 18 0.12% 0.0 0.09%
Landscape for Industry 3 0.02% 0.0 0.04%
Landscape for Goverrvnent 12 0.08% 0.0 0.39%
Landscape for Industrial 2 0.01% 0.0 0.06%
Landscape for Industrial 65 0.43% 0.3 3.29%
Landscape for Multi-Units 17 0.11% 0.1 0.66%
Residential with Fire Protection 3 0.02% 0.0 0.03%
Multi-Units with Fire Protection 0 0.00% 0.0 0.00%
Adjustments NA NA 0.0 -0.28%
Subtotal 32,137 100.00% 8.0 100.00%
Comb; ned
Single Family Residential 24,215 54.36% 7.9 62.33%
Multi-Family Residential 16,642 37.36% 2.4 19.14%
Comnercial 3,436 7.71% 2.0 15.42%
Other 251 0.56% 0.4 3.12%
44,544 100.00% 12.7 100.00%
. Otay User Data as of September 1990.
+ Sweetwater User Data as of July 1990.
B-! 05/13/91
APPENDIX B
PARTIAL YATER USER AND CONSUMPTION SUMMARY
Nl.ITIber of Average Flow
Units in MGD
MontQomerv Area #
Residential 3,072 39.46% 1.0 33.54%
Construction 0 0.00% 0.0 0.00%
Business 1,223 15.71% 1.1 37.47%
Industrial 5 0.06% 0.0 0.15%
Government 19 0.24% 0.0 1. 36%
Apartments 3,222 41. 38% 0.7 22.41%
Agricultural 1 0.01% 0.0 0.02%
Landscape for Industry 2 0.03% 0.0 0.04%
Landscape for Government 28 0.36% 0.1 2.34%
Landscape for Industrial 0 0.00% 0.0 0.00%
Landscape for Industrial 13 0.17% 0.1 1.84%
Landscape for Multi-Units 191 2.45% 0.0 0.74%
ResidentiaL with Fire Protection 7 0.09% 0.0 0.07%
MuLti-Units with Fire Protection 3 0.04% 0.0 0.01%
Adjustments NA NA 0.0 0.00%
-
SubtotaL 7,786 100.00% 3.0 100.00%
ChuLa Vista Totals
Single FamiLy Residential 27,294 52.16% 8.9 56.79%
Multi.FamiLy Residential 19,867 37.96% 3.1 19.77%
Comnercial 4,683 8.95% 3.1 19.97%
Other 486 0.93% 0.5 3.48%
TotaL 52,330 100.00% 15.7 100.00%
# Montgomery Area User Data as of February 1991.
B-2
05/13/91
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
SUBMITTED BY:
Item ~ '<
Meeting Date 6/i'879f
Resolution \~"t-i, Adopting a Modified Sewer Rate For Multi-Family
Lots With Multiple Water Meters
Director of Public W~rk~
City Manager 91 it
(4/5ths Vote: Yes_No_)
ITEM TITLE:
REVIEWED BY:
On June 4, 1991, Ms. Laura Smith addressed the City Council about her concerns on the costs
involved in connection with her sewer bills on rental property she owns. She indicated that
because of the fact that her units were all individually metered she was paying a substantially
higher monthly sewer bill than comparable multifamily properties with a single water meter.
In actuality, she has two meters serving three units on one lot and two meters serving four units
on the other lot. The City Council directed that this item be docketed for the June 18, 1991
meeting with an appropriate report and recommendations from staff.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the resolution enacting a modified
sewer rate for multi-family lots with multiple water meters according to alternative two.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: None.
DISCUSSION:
Ms. Laura Smith owns two separate lots at 244/246 'G' Street and 248/250 'G' Street with three
and four apartment units respectively on the lots. On the lot at 244/246 'G' Street, there are
two water meters to serve the three units and at 248/250 'G' Street there are two water meters
to serve the four units. The City's sewer rate structure for multiple family units is based on a
rate per hundred cubic feet of water used with a minimum billing equal to the single family flat
rate. Because of this, Ms. Smith's sewer bills have been higher than a comparable apartment
unit with one water meter. There has been no other available rate structure for this type of
situation and both staff and Sweetwater Authority have indicated in the past that she should
install a single meter to solve her problem. Ms. Smith indicated she uses these meters to help
control her tenants water use, thereby assisting in water conservation, and that she should not
be penalized for doing so.
Staff has reviewed her water bills and related information and has looked at available
alternatives. The first alternative is to enact a special rate for all multiple family lots with
multiple water meters whereby the sewer billing is based strictly on the usage rate of $1.23 per
one hundred cubic feet of water used with no minimum. This alternative applies the commercial
rate structure to such situations. In the attached tables alternative one has been calculated for
all of Ms. Smiths units since December, 1989 using the rate structure in effect at the time. In
the summary it can be seen that in approximately half of the billing periods Ms. Smith would
"33-1
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date 6/18/91
have paid less than a single family home for the apartments and in over half the periods would
have paid less than a comparable multiple family unit with a single meter. If we use variable
rates in the future with no minimum, this alternative could be considered for single family
homes. However, it would take a lengthy study to determine the financial impacts of this
alternative. Therefore, this alternative is not recommended.
Alternative two is to apply the multiple family rate to only one meter on the lot and the
commercial rate to all other meters. The property owner would be allowed, at the beginning
only, to select the meter to which the multiple family rate would apply. Under the multiple
family rate, the owner would pay based on water used at $1.23 per hundred cubic feet with a
minimum of the single family flat rate of $12.21 per month ($24.42 per bimonthly billing
period). Although in Ms. Smith's situation this would result in a higher bill than for comparable
multiple family units with a single meter, it would be considerably less than what she is
currently paying. On the attached table for this alternative, staff selected the most advantageous
situation to the property owner, based on past usage, in doing the calculations. This is staffs
recommended alternative.
Alternative three is to enact a special formula for all multiple family lots with multiple meters
such that the minimum billing is spread out proportionately on all meters. Such a formula would
take the form:
(Monthly minimum + no. of D. U.'s on lot) x no. of D.U.'s on meter = Meter minimum.
This alternative would create three minimum rates for Ms. Smith's meters and would have the
possibility of creating a substantial number more citywide depending on the number of multiple
family units with multiple meters within the City. Each special rate structure would have to be
hand calculated and given to the water district to include with the billings. Because of the
possibility of a large number of special rates, staff contacted Sweetwater Authority and Otay
Water District for their input. Otay Water indicated that it could be done, but with the need to
reprogram the computer to accept several codes, and with their backlog, it would be about a
year before it could be done. Sweetwater initially was not able to provide an immediate answer,
but they have indicated to staff in the past that they do not want to continue providing sewer
billing services. Subsequently, they did advise us that there was no way they could possibly
handle this type of change. Because of the potential for a large number of special rates which
must be individually calculated for each condition, and the potential problems with the water
districts, staff does not recommend this alternative.
The fourth alternative is to not change the rate structure. This would require Ms. Smith to
install a single meter to obtain a rate equivalent to other multiple family units. This could be
done with the property owner retaining the individual meters for monitoring purposes. Staff
does not recommend this alternative because, according to the property owner, it would not be
cost effective.
33-)
Page 3, Item
Meeting Date 6/18/91
SUMMARY:
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a modified sewer rate structure for multiple family
lots with multiple water meters such that one of the water meters has the regular multiple family
rate structure. This rate structure includes a rate per hundred cubic feet of water used with a
minimum billing equal to that of a single family residence. All other water meters would have
the rate per hundred cubic feet of water used and would not include a minimum billing applied.
Further, the property owner would be allowed to select the meter to which the multiple family
rate is applied, but only at the beginning of the modified rate structure. Such a rate structure
would be applied only upon request of the property owner because of the difficulty in staff
determining when it would apply without owner input. Attached is a summary of the billings
for the Smith properties under the different alternatives comparing them with a comparable
standard multiple family complex and a single family bill. This summary indicates that, taking
all of the complexities into account, the recommended alternative is the most equitable solution.
FISCAL IMPACT:
Staff does not have, nor can we determine, the precise number of lots or units that would be
affected by this modification. However, we believe the fiscal impact would be minimal on an
annual basis.
File: KR-001, KY-158
Attachment: Billing Summary Tables (3) NO'" S~JIINAJ41>
(WP51 ISW ANSONlSWR-RATE.MMO)
3 3-.3
~ I)
JI..J
/) "I/;-:;~
DelX-.e"
I~
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
Meeting Date 6/18/91
ITEM TITLE: Resolution Adopting a Modifif)d Sewer Rate For Multi-Family
Lots With MjJltiple Water Meters
SUBMITTED BY: Director of ~UbliC Works ~
REVIEWED BY: City Manage\~~& (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No~.J
\
\ .
On June 4, 1991, Ms. Laura Smith apdressed the City Council about her concerns on the costs
involved in connection with her sew~r bills.Am rental property she owns. She indicated that
because of the fact that .her units wer~ alllndivi~ually metered .she v:as pa~ing a substantially
hIgher monthly sewer bIll than compa\al'J1e multifamIly properties wIth a smgle water meter.
The City Council directed that thiS...~.te,T"be docketed for the June 18, 1991 meeting with an
appropnate report and recommendatIlins\rom staff.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Cit Council adopt the resolution enacting a modified
sewer rate for multi-family lots with multi e water meters according to alternative two.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECO
None.
DISCUSSION:
Ms. Laura Smith owns two separate lots at 244/24 'G' Street and 248/250 'G' Street with three
and four apartment unitS respectively on the lots. n the lot at 244/246 'G' Street, there are
two water meters to serve the three units and at 248~0 'G' Street there are two water meters
to serve the four units. The City's sewer rate structur~for multiple family units is based on a
rate per hundred cubic feet of water used with a minimu~ billing equal to the single family flat
rate. Because of this, Ms. Smith's sewer bills have been ~gher than a comparable apartment
unit with one water meter. There has been no other avaihib1e rate structure for this type of
situation and both staff and Sweetwater Authority have indicated in the past that she should
install a sil)tie meter to solve her problem. Ms. Smith indicated she uses these meters to help
control hili tenants water use, thereby assisting in water conservation, and that she should not
be pena)1'zed for doing so.
Staff has reviewed her water bills and related information and has looked at available
alternatives. The first alternative is to enact a special rate for all multiple family lots with
multiple water meters whereby the sewer billing is based strictly on the usage rate of $1.23 per
one hundred cubic feet of water used with no minimum. This alternative applies the commercial
rate structure to such situations. In the attached tables alternative one has been calculated for
all of Ms. Smiths units since December, 1989 using the rate structure in effect at the time. In
the summary it can be seen that in approximately half of the billing periods Ms. Smith would
have paid less than a single family home for the apartments and in over half the periods would
33-'1
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date 6/18/91
have paid less than a comparable multiple family unit with a single meter. If we use variable
rates in the future with no minimum, this alternative could be considered for single family
homes. However, it would take a lengthy study to determine the financial impacts of this
alternative. Therefore, this alternative is not recommended.
Alternative two is to apply the multiple family rate to only one meter on the lot and the
commercial rate to all other meters. The property owner would be allowed, at the beginning
only, to select the meter to which the multiple family rate would apply. Under the multiple
family rate, the owner would pay based on water used at $1.23 per hundred cubic feet with a
minimum of the single family flat rate of $12.21 per month ($24.42 per bimonthly billing
period). Although in Ms. Smith's situation this would result in a higher bill than for comparable
multiple family units with a single meter, it would be considerably less than what she is
currently paying. On the attached table for this alternative, staff selected the most advantageous
situation to the property owner, based on past usage, in doing the calculations. This is staffs
recommended alternative.
Alternative three is to enact a special formula for all multiple family lots with multiple meters
such that the minimum billing is spread out proportionately on all meters. Such a formula would
take the form:
(Monthly minimum + no. of D. Uo's on lot) x no. of D. Uo's on meter = Meter minimum.
This alternative would create three minimum rates for Ms. Smith's meters and would have the
possibility of creating a substantial number more citywide depending on the number of multiple
family units with multiple meters within the City. Each special rate structure would have to be
hand calculated and given to the water district to include with the billings. Because of the
possibility of a large number of special rates, staff contacted Sweetwater Authority and Otay
Water District for their input. Otay Water indicated that it could be done, but with the need to
reprogram the computer to accept several codes, and with their backlog, it would be about a
year before it could be done. Sweetwater was not able to provide an immediate answer, but they
have indicated to staff in the past that they do not want to continue providing sewer billing
services. This alternative, if requested of them, could exacerbate that situation. Because of the
potential for a large number of special rates which must be individually calculated for each
condition, and the potential problems with the water districts, staff does not recommend this
alternative.
The fourth alternative is to not change the rate structure. This would require Ms. Smith to
install a single meter to obtain a rate equivalent to other multiple family units. This could be
done with the property owner retaining the individual meters for monitoring purposes. Staff
does not recommend this alternative because, according to the property owner, it would not be
cost effective.
SUMMARY:
Staff recommends that the City Council adopt a modified sewer rate structure for multiple family
33-5
Page 3, Item
Meeting Date 6/18/91
lots with multiple water meters such that one of the water meters has the regular multiple family
rate structure. This rate structure includes a rate per hundred cubic feet of water used with a
minimum billing equal to that of a single family residence. All other water meters would have
the rate per hundred cubic feet of water used and would not include a minimum billing applied.
Further, the property owner would be allowed to select the meter to which the multiple family
rate is applied, but only at the beginning of the modified rate structure. Such a rate structure
would be applied only upon request of the property owner because of the difficulty in staff
determining when it would apply without owner input. Attached is a summary of the billings
for the Smith properties under the different alternatives comparing them with a comparable
standard multiple family complex and a single family bill. This summary indicates that, taking
all of the complexities into account, the recommended alternative is the most equitable solution.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The amount of the sewer billings would be minimally reduced under the recommended
alternative.
File: KR-001, KY-158
Attachment: Billing Summary Tables (3)
33-"
APN 568-420-58 : 244 & 246 "G" Street
ALTERNATIVE 1 SEWER SERVICE CHARGE CALCULATION
BilLING WATER USAGE (100 C.F.1 SEWER BilLING CALCULATION
PERIOD Acct.820 Acct.900 Total Rate($/HCF) Acct.820 Acct.900 Total
Dec. '89 9 4 13 $0.70 $6.30 $2.80 $9.10
Feb. '90 12 1 13 $0.70 $8.40 $0.70 $9.10
Apr. '90 12 15 27 $0.70 $8.40 $10.50 $18.90
Jun. '90 11 11 22 $0.70 $7.70 $7.70 $15.40
Aug. '90 9 14 23 $0.70 $6.30 $9.80 $16.10
Oct. '90 5 18 23 $0.84 $4.20 $15.12 $19.32
Dec. '90 6 15 21 $0.84 $5.04 $12.60 $17.64
Feb. '91 6 8 14 $0.84 $5.04 $6.72 $11.76
Apr. '91 4 3 7 $0.84 $3.36 $2.52 $5.88
APN 568-420-58 : 244 & 246 "G" Street
ALTERNATIVE 2 SEWER SERVICE CHARGE CALCULATION
BILLING WATER USAGE (100 C.F.) SEWER BilLING CALCULATION
PERIOD Acct.820 Acct.900 Total Acct. 820 Acct. 900 Total
..
Dec. '89 9 4 13 9..70=$6.30 $17.40 $23.70
Feb. '90 12 1 13 12..70=$8.40 $17.40 $25.80
Apr. '90 12 15 27 12. .70=$8.40 $17.40 $25.80
Jun. '90 11 11 22 11..70=$7.70 $17.40 $25.10
Aug. '90 9 14 23 9..70=$6.30 $17.40 $23.70
Oct. '90 5 18 23 5. .84=$4.20 $20.82 $25.02
Dec. '90 6 15 21 6. .84=$5.04 $20.82 $25.86
Feb. '91 6 8 14 6. .84=$5.04 $20.82 $25.86
Apr. '91 4 3 7 4. .84=$3.36 $20.82 $24.18
NOTES:
244 "G" Street - S.W.A. Account No. 645-0900-0 - 2 Dwelling Units
246 "G" Street - S.W.A. Account No. 645-0820-0 - 1 Dwelling Unit
Billed Bimonthly
Minimum Usage at $0.70/HCF = $17.40(bimonthly)/0.70=24.9 HCF
Minimum Usage at $0.84/HCF = $20.82(bimonthly)/0.84=24.8 HCF
.. Figures in this coiumn based on minimum S.F. Rate
'33-7
APN 568-420-59 : 248 & 250 "G" Street
AL TERNA TIVE 1 SEWER SERVICE CHARGE CALCULATION
BILLING WATER USAGE (100 C.F.l SEWER BILLING CALCULATION
PERIOD Accl.740 Accl. 780 Total Rate($/HCF) Accl.740 Accl. 780 Total
Dec. ' 89 4 4 8 $0.70 $2.80 $2.80 $5.60
Feb. '90 5 3 8 $0.70 $3.50 $2.10 $5.60
Apr. '90 5 16 21 $0.70 $3.50 $11.20 $14.70
Jun. '90 8 14 22 $0.70 $5.60 $9.80 $15.40
Aug. '90 9 16 25 $0.70 $6.30 $11.20 $17.50
Ocl. '90 9 21 30 $0.84 $7.56 $17.64 $25.20
Dec. '90 7 18 25 $0.84 $5.88 $15.12 $21.00
Feb. '91 9 12 21 $0.84 $7.56 $10.08 $17.64
Apr. '91 8 3 11 $0.84 $6.72 $2.52 $9.24
APN 568-420-59 : 248 & 250 "G" Street
ALTERNATIVE 2 SEWER SERVICE CHARGE CALCULATION
BILLING WATER USAGE (100 C.F.l SEWER BILLING CALCULATION
PERIOD Accl.740 Accl. 780 Total Accl. 740 Accl. 780 Total
..
Dec. '89 4 4 8 4..70=$2.80 $17.40 $20.20
Feb. '90 5 3 8 5..70=$3.50 $17.40 $20.90
Apr. '90 5 16 21 5..70=$3.50 $17.40 $20.90
Jun. '90 8 14 22 8..70=$5.60 $17.40 $23.00
Aug. '90 9 16 25 9..70=$6.30 $17.40 $23.70
Ocl. '90 9 21 30 9. .84=$7.56 $20.82 $28.38
Dec. '90 7 18 25 7* .84=$5.88 $20.82 $26.70
Feb. '91 9 12 21 9..84=$7.56 $20.82 $28.38
Apr. '91 8 3 11 8. .84=$6. 72 $20.82 $27.54
NOTES:
248 "G" Street - S.W.A. Account No. 645-0740-0 - 2 Dwelling Units
250 "G" Street - S.W.A. Account No. 645-0780-0 - 2 Dwelling Units
Billed Bimonthly
Minimum Usage at $0.70/HCF = $17.40(blmonthly)/0.70=24.9 HCF
Minimum Usage at $0.84/HCF = $20.82(bimonthly)/0.84=24.8 HCF
.. Figures in this column based on minimum S.F. Rate
33-~
SUMMARY FOR 248 & 250 "G" STREET
APN 568-420-59
-------~-----------------_._--~.__._-~_._---_._------~-------
-,~_._~--------~_._~.__._-_._-.~----~-'------_._-------
Combined Actual Comparable
Billing Water Sewer Multi Single
Period Use (HCR lli!l Familv (1) .E9!:nilY. AIt.1 AIt.2
Dec. '89 8 $34.80 $17.40 $17.40 $5.60 $20.20
Feb. '90 8 $34.80 $17.40 $17.40 $5.60 $20.90
Apr. '90 21 $34.80 $17.40 $17.40 $14.70 $20.90
Jun. '90 22 $34.80 $17.40 $17.40 $15.40 $23.00
Aug. '90 25 $34.80 $17.50 $17.40 $17.50 $23.70
Oct. '90 30 $41.64 $25.20 $20.82 $25.20 $28.38
Dec. '90 25 $41.64 $21.00 $20.82 $21.00 $26.70
Feb. '91 21 $41.64 $20.82 $20.82 $17.64 $28.38
Apr. '91 12 $41.64 $20.82 $20.82 $9.24 $27.54
NOTE (1) Comparable Multi Family with Single Water Meter
3.3- ?
RESOLUTION NO.~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ADOPTING A MODIFIED SEWER RATE FOR
MULTI-FAMILY LOTS WITH MULTIPLE WATER METERS
AND AMENDING THE MASTER FEE SCHEDULE
The City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, on June
City Council about her
connection with her sewer
4, 1991, Ms. Laura Smith addressed the
concerns on the costs involved in
bills on rental property she owns; and
WHEREAS, because of the fact tha t her uni ts were all
individually metered, she was paying a substantially higher
monthly sewer bill than comparable mUltifamily properties with a
single water meter; and
WHEREAS, the City Council directed that staff return
with an appropriate recommendation from staff; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends applying the multiple family
rate to only one meter on the lot and a rate per hundred cubic
feet with no minimum to all others and the property owner would
be allowed, at the beg inning only, to select the meter to which
the multiple family rate would apply; and
WHEREAS, under the multiple family rate, the owner would
pay based on water used at $1.23 per hundred cubic feet with a
minimum of the single family flat rate of $12.21 per month
($24.42 per bimonthly billing period) on one meter and on water
used at $1.23 per hundred cubic feet with no minimum on all
others.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula vista does hereby adopt a modified sewer rate
for mUlti-family lots with multiple water meters at the rate of
$1. 23 per hundred cubic feet with a minimum single family flat
rate of $12.21 per month on one meter and on water used at the
rate of $1.23 per hundred cubic feet with no minimum.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Master Fee Schedule
shall be amended to add the modified multiple amily sewer rate.
Presented by
form by
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
8963a
Attorney
'33-ld
___~D CNTY BRD OF SUPRVRS TEL No 619 5
. - 57-4025
Jun 10,91 17:40 NO.031 P
.01
(l:ll1\~~p~~~~',;'~~ll ~trgo
iOU~I~~~,fl, l:rfllt.6l1fJ3
"ij1.:"i~J~:t'~~I(~ '
~ ~:'l:f!.~ .~
1 .~,\JII ~ ,\. . I-" ,-
, ~llf( 2=1, e"III~(.),; ~rU~~~~~
.. "'1, ,.-.1 _II' i r ,~~
t'iNt-t1f.l\,~"--'.' ,'~ I"~' "?<,.- "',
",,1"'" 01->-:' I ~"'..
l:;.~~.,.~'<", ,. ': ' 'il
.~~~~ .i." - ~. ._-~, '"
@I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~\
lUU JUN \ I \99\ I~
~cGl,onol &:.;:rdl.
,~
:";.
.:
NOlic;I"I:;1 t.. SIClte 8oordl~
N::.llonol AuotiQl1on Qf
countieS
CO~lnly Supc.....i!Ofi Anocic1ion
Qf Colifotl'liel
Sou:hlrn CQllfoll,ia HQ;=rdou'5
WOIII MOM:Jgcl"l'Ient "\,lltlerlTy
South.rn Colifcu'lio Regional
A~,e(.iOlion of COIo.m'il!1
lEON L. WilLIAMS
SUPERVISOR
FOURTH DISTRICT
FAX COVER SHEET
Fax number: 557-4025
Me~rc.poliIOr'1 T~oruil
t:"\/'I!~op.,...~:*:l Boord
Son ClieGlo Regional Water
Rl!c1om:)! ion Agency
Ci:y!COllnfy $lcif"lveltm~nl
to~1r. Fc~ce
i/:&iliC!'I:>t TCllr. Force Cll"l
The HO!'l"\e:DU,
Date
It> I \e /9J
To MA'Ic'e... r~D\ eM UOCQ ~
Fax Number G::,<:J \ - ~1..\
From ~...IO\(\S~ L9 rn-\ "'-I'LL\ A M$
,\
','
Number of pages following cover sheet r.f'
Comments:
"If w~ dte/Y ./II}! Chvl/t to-~ ;{o/ m ~l)9c, UJ~of &...
loG'c.n( C~rUru. ~ HeH~1 See/AI" S!/J writ /?~ ~<W(
a. ~ q?J- f/4"I'<',r"ff- 73<11- ('/9 AI ,w" De ec<,cRo! t1f~;"';
t:((c. C c:. viii U.'s!A S'u:l< fiJ ~l'l'q~/ /ya~ }1(4., S'/A-' MG' ~~
v:
1J1,J(/ S'~#_S'pe;)1c ~ 8~c/ IY/',*M;~7 ~ "vt'd-, '01f'<f r
H~e.~ f7?,dRj ~i \J (jI.k /me/' ldV'AIC/1 /?(;~.;(-( SMd /J;..,(~
M ~~ C~'(J/U~Nre.. q')./ .a.1Ck(}<';&.A'r~ /2W,1"6 f~}~r ..<1",~
.d'".,' 4"~
1600 PACIFIC HIGHWAa hit r:..~/' CAliFORNIA 92101 . (619) 531-5544
...;,'r
...:".
vU \....I~ I I J..JI'-..v WI
vVII'VI'....., 'l....l....I~U.'-;...~-'-',
....'-'....-'
Nallonol . STate aootds.~
National Auocla1ion of
Covn'icl
County Supervllor5 Auoclotlof"l
of Californlo
Sootht,n California Hazardous
WaSte ManoVC'l'nIlnl Avthoritv
$cutn"" Caflfomia hglonnl
AlsCJCiOlion of Counties
TO:
From:
Date:
Subject:
" nUrgn
Reg:onol B::'olch
MetropohTon T(on,;1
OE!velopmtl"ll Boate!
51;m Diego ll:egiol"lOl WOlor
R.c.IClmolion Agentv
City/County ReinvestmenT
losk Force
Regional Task Force on
The Hom.I!!!U
LEON L. WILLIAMS
SUPERVISOR
FOURTH DISTRICT
SANDAG Board Memb~/'
Leon L. Williams C"Y"'.
June 10, 1991
creation of a san Diego county Regional Airport
Authority Exploration Committee
The issue of wheth stablish a San iego County Regional
Airport Authorit E oration committee w 1 be before the Board
of supervisors n esday, June 11, 1991. The intent of this
proposal is to c eate a committee which wi 1 represent the entire
County of San lego and make recommendatio 13 on the most
appropriate or ani~ational structure an financing mechanism for
the ultimate es blishment of a Reg' al Airport Authority. This
issue is being b ught forward his time to ensure that the
region as a whole is . 1n resolving its complexities.
Please find attached a six page agenda item entitled "san
County Regional Airport Authority Exploration Committee."
have any questions regarding the letter please contact me
5544.
Diego
If you
at 531-
1600 PACIFIC HIGHWAY' SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92101 . (619) 531.5544
3~A-~
~
SD CNTY BRD OF SUPRVRS TEL No.619-557-4025
Jun 10,91 17:40 No.031 P.03
7j
'--
DATB:
June 11, l!l91
S tJBJBC'l' :
Board of supervi~ors
San Diego county Regional. Airport Authority
Exploration Committee
TO:
SUMMARY I
I8SUE..;
Shoul.d the County, as the regional government representing all
eiqhteen oities and the unincorporated area, establish a seven
member San Diego County Regional Airport Authority Exploration
Co 'ttee to identif an end the m a ro riate
anizatlona s ruc ure for a San D1ego Count Re al
Air art Authorit wh ch wou charge 1071 . t e respon-
~ llity tn p~ouide for the region's integra ed air transport
needs? _ . . (J" . ^'_.. ?
VJI\.<llh1 U'f} ~ /'Il.rrW ..
RBCOMMENDATIOIHSI;
SUPBRVISOR WILLIAMS:
1)
Approve the establishment of a San Diego County Regional
Airport Authority Exploration Co~ittee to determine the
most appropriate organizational structure and financing
mechanism for the establ.ishment of a San Diego county
Regional Airport Authority, and to identify and make
recommendations on other issues surrounding the creation
Of such an authority.
\......-.
2) Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to
invite the other agencies in San Diego County which are
involved in the operation or pl.anning of airports (these
include the Unified Port District, the city of San Diego,
the city cif Oceanside and san Diego Association of
Gov.rn~ents) to participate in the establishment of such
a committee.
3) Direct the CAO to investigate staffing needs and evaluate
appropriate funding sources, inclUding the availability
of Airport Enterprise Funds, necessary to establ.ish a San
Diego County Regional Airport Authority Exploration
committee. Approve in concept the County's commitment
to fund up to $100,000 to support the staffing, opera-
tions and necessary consultant services for the San Diego
County Regional Airport Authority Exploration committee.
L,
JUN 1 , \99\
3 (,Ft-.3
7"3
,UBJECT: San Diego County Regional Airport Authority Exploration
Committee
'--
ADVISORY STATEMENT
No advisory statements or recommendations have been received
relative to this action.
I'I8CAL IMPACT
By approving these recommendations. the Board is approving in
concept the expenditure of up to $100,000 towards the
staffing, operations and necessary consultant services for the
San Diego County Regional Airport Authority Exploration
committee. No expenditures will be made before staff returns
to the Board during budget deliberations with final recommen-
dations.
B"CltOROUNDz
THE HEBD ~OR BXpANDED AIR TRANSPORT P"CILITIES
~-,
Although san Diego International Airport-Lindbergh Field is
centrally located and generates an operating profit, the san
Diego region needs to expand its air transport facilities for
many reasons. predictions are that in a short time, auto
traffic coincident to Lindbergh Field will become so severe
that getting to and from the airport may take longer than many
flights. Additionally, air traffic operations are becoming
increasingly congested. In 1989, there were mOre than 200,000
take-offs and landings at Lindbergh Field and that number is
expected to grow 2\ annually. The passenger load is projected
to increase 460,000 annually, and by 1999 the' average take-
off delay for an afternoon departure will be 14 minutes.
There is concern that Lindbergh Field's inadequate size will
adversely affect the economic health of the San Diego region
and its ability to compete within the emerging Pacific Rim
market. Economists have estimated that without additional air
carrier capacity there will be a loss of "economic oppor-
tunity" in the range of $33 to $55 billion between now and the
year 2050.
2
L
3(, A - 'I
...'....~e~... .....
' .....>i-,-..., ''''.'.
....-,.._".,'...._..
.
SD CNTY BRD OF SUPRVRS TEL No.619-557-4025
~.
Jun 10,91 17:40 No.U61 ~.U~
"-.--
'--
L
73
SUBJECT: S~n Diego County Regional Airport Authority E~ploration
Committe"
THE SITING OF ~ NEW AIRPORT
The 8earc~ for a new airport to replace Lindbergh Field has
been a recurring issue for the region since World War II. In
the event that a new airport is sited in the region, there
needs to be an authority in place which can acquire, plan for,
build, finance, operate, m~intain and administer the new
facility.
INTBR-AGBNCY COOPZBATION
Presently, there are four agencies which operate airports in
the County of San Diego and one that serves as the primary
transportation planning aqency:
1) The County of San Diego operates McClell~n-palomar Field,
Gillespie Field, Ramona Airport, Borrego Valley Airport,
Agua Caliente Springs Airstrip, Ocotillo Wells Airport,
Jacumba Airport and Fallbrook Community Airpark.
2) The Unified Port District operates Lindbergh Field.
3) The city of San Diego operates Brown Field and Montgomery
Field.
4)
The City of oceaside operates Oceanside Municipal
Airport .
5) SANDAG is designated by the State of california on behalf
of the Federal Department of Transportation as the
"Metropolitan Planning Organi<!:ation" and serves as the
regional transportation planning agency in San Diego
County. SANOAG has taken a lead role in studying where
a new international airport should be sited.
. Clearly, these agencies, as the airport operators and planners
in the region, all have a vested interest in airport develop-
ment in the region and should be invited to participate in a
San Diego county Regional Airport Authority Exploration
Committee to determine the organi<!:ational structure most
suitable for a San Diego San Diego County Regional Airport
Authority.
working together, these agencies should examine the issues
surrounding the creation of such an authority in order to form
a mutually beneficial agreement which will serve the best
interests of all citizens in the County of San Diego. The
Committee would be charged with identifying and recommending
the moat appropriate organizational strUcture for a San Diego
county Regional Airport Authority with" responsibility to
provide for the region's in~egrated air transport needs.
3,A-~
..
~i.! LI\l1 f bKU Ur ~UrKVK~ I t.L I'~O. 01 '=,-~:.> (-4U,i:.>
..Juri lU..:ll 11 . '-tV I~U .0""... I.VV
I,)
;
L
,,-.
~/
SUBJECT: san Diego County Regional Airport Authority Exploration
committee
:It is in the best interest of San Diego County and its
residents for the County to continue its active participation
in airport issues:
.
The County serves as the only regional government, with
its elected officials representing citizens of all 18
cities and the unincorporated area.
SANDAG has recognized the County's planning and land use
responsibilities in airport siting.
The County has shared responsibilities tor coordinating
and/or providing road/rail access to and from the
proposed airports.
The County owns and operates eight airports in the region
and has extensive experience in airport management.
.
.
.
.
The County is the state appointed responsible agency for
issues relating to noise problems surrounding airports
and has the authority to designate "noise problem"
airports County-wide.
There is precedence for County participation in incor-
porated area-based public agencies, including:
-f-
Metropolitan Transit Development Board, regional
surface transportation authority.
2) Metropolitan Waste Water Authority.
1)
3) Regional air pollution control.
By actively participating in the airport issue through the
establishment of a San Diego County Regional Airport Ailthority
Exploration committee, the county would maintain a further
role as a charter member of the San Diego County Regional
Airport Authority.
4
a ~Il - b
"'.I...-' .....1 ~ I I .....Jl',.;,.; '-"
L
"--
L-
,-,''-',
73
SUBJECT: san Diego County Regional Airport Authority Exploration
COlDIllittee
SAN OIaGO COUNTY REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY EXPLORATION
COMMITTEB'S KAXB UP
The San Di8go County Regional Airport Authority Exploration
Committee would be made up of seven appointed citizen
representatives (not elected officials): two fro~ the County
of San Diego, two from the city of San Diego, one each from
the city of oceanside, the San Diego Unified port District and
the San Oieqo Association of Governments. The representa-
tives should ~e selected so that they bring a broad spectrum
of expertise to the committee necessary to developing
recommendations regarding the formation of'a San Diego County
Regional Airport Authority. Examples of desirable fields of
expertise include: finance, law, a~r transport, real estate,
lnterna~ional commerce and local business. The appropriate
staff support would be provided by the participating aqencles.
TtMBLINB
It is intended that each agency appoint its respective
representative(s) to the San Diego County Regional Airport
Authority Exploration committee by August 1, 1991. The
committee would then meet as often as determined necessary in
order to make their recommendations on the issues surrounding
creation of an Airport Authority by December 1, 1991.
Respectfully submitted,
LEON
Board of
5
3i11f - :r-
SD CNTY BRD OF SUPRVRS TEL NO.619-557-4025
L
L
L
Jun 10.91 17:40 No.031 P.OS
73
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA ITEM
XNFORMATION SHEET
SUBJECT:
Airport Authority Exploration Committee
SUPV. DrST.: ~l
90UNTY COUNSBL APPROVAL: Form and Leqality
( )Standard Form ( )Ordinance
(x)Yes ( )N/A
( )Resolution
7lUDXTOR l\PPROV1L:
(x)N/A
( )Yes
4 VOTES: ()Yes
(X)No
I'INANC1:AL XANAGZMBNT RBVrB1U
( ) Yes
(x)No
CONTRACT UV1:B1f PANEL:
( ) Approved
(x)N/A
~ONTRACT NUMBBReS)I N/A
PRBVXOUS RELEVANT BOARD ACTION: 6/5/90 (.66 << 67) Board approved
appointment of Supervisor williams to serve as the County represen-
tative on SANDAG airport deleqation charged with entering into
discussions with the United States and Mexico governments to
determine the feasibility of a binational airport. 1/29/91 (#75)
supervisor Williams reappointed to airport delegation.
BOARD POLXCXBS APPL~CABLB: None
,
CITIZEN COMMITTEB STATEMENT: N/A
CONCURRENCBlS): None
CONTACT PERSON: Adrienne Brodeur, S30/531-5544, A-SOO
ORraINATING DEPARTMENT:
Fourth supervisorial District
DBPARTMENT AUTHORIZBD aBPRBSENTATZVE
MEETZNG DATE
6
3 (,A- - i
SUBJECf: AB 1040 (HAYS)
June 18, 1991
There is a proposal - AB 1040 (Hays) to limit salaries granted by local
agencies (counties, schools and cities). In concept, it would limit salary
increases to whatever the State gives its employees.
If local employee salaries are increased above that of the State, the State
would reduce any State appropriation to the local agency by that amount.
Currently there are no salary increases proposed by the State of California.
This proposal would not have an impact on merit increases or promotions.
Cities would be unable to make any changes to PERS - i. e. pick up employee
portion of PERS.
oppose.. und
Council Acontact Senate members
This is time sensitive, staff recommends
ASAP based on the following reasons:
1. As a Charter City, this violates our home rule authority to set
employee wages and benefits. This may be unconstitutional.
2. Violates existing MOU agreements with bargaining units which
would be detrimental to the meet and confer process.
This item is not on the agenda.
City staff was informed of this measure late this afternoon. Due to its time
sensitive nature, staff recommends Council authorize staff to proceed.
AS 1040 is addressed by the Legislative Program thus requires no Council
action.
~
--Ii!'"
~
1
RESOLUTION NO. 16227
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA FINDING THAT THE USE OF TAXES
ALLOCATED FROM THE SOUTHWEST REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECT AREA, AS AMENDED BY THE FIRST
AMENDMENT TO THE SOUTHWEST REDEVELOPMENT
PLAN, FOR THE PURPOSE OF HOUSING OUTSIDE OF
THE PROJECT AREA WILL BE BENEFIT TO THE
PROJECT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula vista (the
City) has prepared a proposed First Amendment to the
Redevelopment Plan for the Southwest Redevelopment Project (the
Project) and Project Area (the Project Area), which would result
in the allocation of taxes from the Project Area, as amended by
the First Amendment to the Project, to the Agency for the
purposes of redevelopment: and
WHEREAS, section 33334.2 of the California Community
Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code sections 33000 et.
seq.) requires that not less than twenty percent (20%) of all
taxes so allocated to be used by the Agency for improving,
increasing, and preserving the city's supply of low and moderate
income housing: and
WHEREAS, section 33334.2(g) of the ~fAfornia Community
Redevelopment Law provides that the Agency ~ use such funds
outside of the Project Area if a finding is made by resolution of
the Agency and the City Council of the City of Chula vista that
such use will be of benefit to the Project Area before the
Redevelopment Plan is adopted.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the use of taxes allocated from the
Project Area, as amended by the proposed First Amendment, for the
purpose of improving, increasing and preserving the community's
supply of low and moderate income housing available at affordable
housing costs outside the project Area and within the city of
Chula vista will be of benefit to the Project.
Pre"~ted by ife! a
~L..~~~. I~
Chris Salomone
Community Development Director
Oh"'*o2O%<.' I q I
r
I
RESOLUTION NO. 16??R
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA CERTIFYING THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION FOR THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE SOUTHWEST
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN, CITY OF CHULA VISTA
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, the Chula vista Redevelopment Agency (the Agency)
has initiated a redevelopment program through the adoption of the
Redevelopment Plan for the Southwest Redevelopment Project Area
(the Project Area); and
WHEREAS, the Agency and the city Council of the City of
Chula vista (the City council) have consented to a joint public
hearing for consideration of the proposed First Amendment to the
Redevelopment Plan for the Southwest Redevelopment proj ect Area
(the First Amendment); and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to undertake an environmental
evaluation prior to adoption of the proposed First Amendment; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality
Act and State EIR Guidelines, a Mitigated Negative Declaration
has been prepared on the proposed First Amendment; and
WHEREAS, after expiration of the period for public review
and comment on the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for
the proposed First Amendment; and
WHEREAS, prior to considering the First Amendment, the
Agency must determine whether the Mitigated Negative Declaration
has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act and State EIR Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, the city Council has reviewed the Mitigated Negative
Declaration an all proceedings incident thereto:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1.
The above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2.
as follows:
a. q!8.e fhe Mitigated Negative Declaration has been
prepared and completed in the time, form and manner required by
the California Environmental Quality Act and State EIR
Guidelines; and
The City Council hereby finds and determines
chula\ccmilapp
-1-
~ Jq7-
b. That approval of the First Amendment should be
subject to such mitigation measures as may be set forth in the
Mitigated Negative Declaration; and
c. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been
reviewed and considered prior to consideration of the proposed
First Amendment.
SECTION 3. The City Council hereby approves the
Mitigated Negative Declaration subject to the finding specified
in SECTION 2 of this resolution.
c~ ~.~~
form by
Presented by
Chris Salomone
Community Development Director
Bruce Boog<1'ra
City Attorney
chula\ccmltapp
1C/9
-2-