HomeMy WebLinkAbout1991/06/18 Item 36A
___~D CNTY BRD OF SUPRVRS TEL No 619 5
. - 57-4025
Jun 10,91 17:40 NO.031 P
.01
(l:ll1\~~p~~~~',;'~~ll ~trgo
iOU~I~~~,fl, l:rfllt.6l1fJ3
"ij1.:"i~J~:t'~~I(~ '
~ ~:'l:f!.~ .~
1 .~,\JII ~ ,\. . I-" ,-
, ~llf( 2=1, e"III~(.),; ~rU~~~~~
.. "'1, ,.-.1 _II' i r ,~~
t'iNt-t1f.l\,~"--'.' ,'~ I"~' "?<,.- "',
",,1"'" 01->-:' I ~"'..
l:;.~~.,.~'<", ,. ': ' 'il
.~~~~ .i." - ~. ._-~, '"
@I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~\
lUU JUN \ I \99\ I~
~cGl,onol &:.;:rdl.
,~
:";.
.:
NOlic;I"I:;1 t.. SIClte 8oordl~
N::.llonol AuotiQl1on Qf
countieS
CO~lnly Supc.....i!Ofi Anocic1ion
Qf Colifotl'liel
Sou:hlrn CQllfoll,ia HQ;=rdou'5
WOIII MOM:Jgcl"l'Ient "\,lltlerlTy
South.rn Colifcu'lio Regional
A~,e(.iOlion of COIo.m'il!1
lEON L. WilLIAMS
SUPERVISOR
FOURTH DISTRICT
FAX COVER SHEET
Fax number: 557-4025
Me~rc.poliIOr'1 T~oruil
t:"\/'I!~op.,...~:*:l Boord
Son ClieGlo Regional Water
Rl!c1om:)! ion Agency
Ci:y!COllnfy $lcif"lveltm~nl
to~1r. Fc~ce
i/:&iliC!'I:>t TCllr. Force Cll"l
The HO!'l"\e:DU,
Date
It> I \e /9J
To MA'Ic'e... r~D\ eM UOCQ ~
Fax Number G::,<:J \ - ~1..\
From ~...IO\(\S~ L9 rn-\ "'-I'LL\ A M$
,\
','
Number of pages following cover sheet r.f'
Comments:
"If w~ dte/Y ./II}! Chvl/t to-~ ;{o/ m ~l)9c, UJ~of &...
loG'c.n( C~rUru. ~ HeH~1 See/AI" S!/J writ /?~ ~<W(
a. ~ q?J- f/4"I'<',r"ff- 73<11- ('/9 AI ,w" De ec<,cRo! t1f~;"';
t:((c. C c:. viii U.'s!A S'u:l< fiJ ~l'l'q~/ /ya~ }1(4., S'/A-' MG' ~~
v:
1J1,J(/ S'~#_S'pe;)1c ~ 8~c/ IY/',*M;~7 ~ "vt'd-, '01f'<f r
H~e.~ f7?,dRj ~i \J (jI.k /me/' ldV'AIC/1 /?(;~.;(-( SMd /J;..,(~
M ~~ C~'(J/U~Nre.. q')./ .a.1Ck(}<';&.A'r~ /2W,1"6 f~}~r ..<1",~
.d'".,' 4"~
1600 PACIFIC HIGHWAa hit r:..~/' CAliFORNIA 92101 . (619) 531-5544
...;,'r
...:".
vU \....I~ I I J..JI'-..v WI
vVII'VI'....., 'l....l....I~U.'-;...~-'-',
....'-'....-'
Nallonol . STate aootds.~
National Auocla1ion of
Covn'icl
County Supervllor5 Auoclotlof"l
of Californlo
Sootht,n California Hazardous
WaSte ManoVC'l'nIlnl Avthoritv
$cutn"" Caflfomia hglonnl
AlsCJCiOlion of Counties
TO:
From:
Date:
Subject:
" nUrgn
Reg:onol B::'olch
MetropohTon T(on,;1
OE!velopmtl"ll Boate!
51;m Diego ll:egiol"lOl WOlor
R.c.IClmolion Agentv
City/County ReinvestmenT
losk Force
Regional Task Force on
The Hom.I!!!U
LEON L. WILLIAMS
SUPERVISOR
FOURTH DISTRICT
SANDAG Board Memb~/'
Leon L. Williams C"Y"'.
June 10, 1991
creation of a san Diego county Regional Airport
Authority Exploration Committee
The issue of wheth stablish a San iego County Regional
Airport Authorit E oration committee w 1 be before the Board
of supervisors n esday, June 11, 1991. The intent of this
proposal is to c eate a committee which wi 1 represent the entire
County of San lego and make recommendatio 13 on the most
appropriate or ani~ational structure an financing mechanism for
the ultimate es blishment of a Reg' al Airport Authority. This
issue is being b ught forward his time to ensure that the
region as a whole is . 1n resolving its complexities.
Please find attached a six page agenda item entitled "san
County Regional Airport Authority Exploration Committee."
have any questions regarding the letter please contact me
5544.
Diego
If you
at 531-
1600 PACIFIC HIGHWAY' SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92101 . (619) 531.5544
3~A-~
~
SD CNTY BRD OF SUPRVRS TEL No.619-557-4025
Jun 10,91 17:40 No.031 P.03
7j
'--
DATB:
June 11, l!l91
S tJBJBC'l' :
Board of supervi~ors
San Diego county Regional. Airport Authority
Exploration Committee
TO:
SUMMARY I
I8SUE..;
Shoul.d the County, as the regional government representing all
eiqhteen oities and the unincorporated area, establish a seven
member San Diego County Regional Airport Authority Exploration
Co 'ttee to identif an end the m a ro riate
anizatlona s ruc ure for a San D1ego Count Re al
Air art Authorit wh ch wou charge 1071 . t e respon-
~ llity tn p~ouide for the region's integra ed air transport
needs? _ . . (J" . ^'_.. ?
VJI\.<llh1 U'f} ~ /'Il.rrW ..
RBCOMMENDATIOIHSI;
SUPBRVISOR WILLIAMS:
1)
Approve the establishment of a San Diego County Regional
Airport Authority Exploration Co~ittee to determine the
most appropriate organizational structure and financing
mechanism for the establ.ishment of a San Diego county
Regional Airport Authority, and to identify and make
recommendations on other issues surrounding the creation
Of such an authority.
\......-.
2) Authorize the Chairman of the Board of Supervisors to
invite the other agencies in San Diego County which are
involved in the operation or pl.anning of airports (these
include the Unified Port District, the city of San Diego,
the city cif Oceanside and san Diego Association of
Gov.rn~ents) to participate in the establishment of such
a committee.
3) Direct the CAO to investigate staffing needs and evaluate
appropriate funding sources, inclUding the availability
of Airport Enterprise Funds, necessary to establ.ish a San
Diego County Regional Airport Authority Exploration
committee. Approve in concept the County's commitment
to fund up to $100,000 to support the staffing, opera-
tions and necessary consultant services for the San Diego
County Regional Airport Authority Exploration committee.
L,
JUN 1 , \99\
3 (,Ft-.3
7"3
,UBJECT: San Diego County Regional Airport Authority Exploration
Committee
'--
ADVISORY STATEMENT
No advisory statements or recommendations have been received
relative to this action.
I'I8CAL IMPACT
By approving these recommendations. the Board is approving in
concept the expenditure of up to $100,000 towards the
staffing, operations and necessary consultant services for the
San Diego County Regional Airport Authority Exploration
committee. No expenditures will be made before staff returns
to the Board during budget deliberations with final recommen-
dations.
B"CltOROUNDz
THE HEBD ~OR BXpANDED AIR TRANSPORT P"CILITIES
~-,
Although san Diego International Airport-Lindbergh Field is
centrally located and generates an operating profit, the san
Diego region needs to expand its air transport facilities for
many reasons. predictions are that in a short time, auto
traffic coincident to Lindbergh Field will become so severe
that getting to and from the airport may take longer than many
flights. Additionally, air traffic operations are becoming
increasingly congested. In 1989, there were mOre than 200,000
take-offs and landings at Lindbergh Field and that number is
expected to grow 2\ annually. The passenger load is projected
to increase 460,000 annually, and by 1999 the' average take-
off delay for an afternoon departure will be 14 minutes.
There is concern that Lindbergh Field's inadequate size will
adversely affect the economic health of the San Diego region
and its ability to compete within the emerging Pacific Rim
market. Economists have estimated that without additional air
carrier capacity there will be a loss of "economic oppor-
tunity" in the range of $33 to $55 billion between now and the
year 2050.
2
L
3(, A - 'I
...'....~e~... .....
' .....>i-,-..., ''''.'.
....-,.._".,'...._..
.
SD CNTY BRD OF SUPRVRS TEL No.619-557-4025
~.
Jun 10,91 17:40 No.U61 ~.U~
"-.--
'--
L
73
SUBJECT: S~n Diego County Regional Airport Authority E~ploration
Committe"
THE SITING OF ~ NEW AIRPORT
The 8earc~ for a new airport to replace Lindbergh Field has
been a recurring issue for the region since World War II. In
the event that a new airport is sited in the region, there
needs to be an authority in place which can acquire, plan for,
build, finance, operate, m~intain and administer the new
facility.
INTBR-AGBNCY COOPZBATION
Presently, there are four agencies which operate airports in
the County of San Diego and one that serves as the primary
transportation planning aqency:
1) The County of San Diego operates McClell~n-palomar Field,
Gillespie Field, Ramona Airport, Borrego Valley Airport,
Agua Caliente Springs Airstrip, Ocotillo Wells Airport,
Jacumba Airport and Fallbrook Community Airpark.
2) The Unified Port District operates Lindbergh Field.
3) The city of San Diego operates Brown Field and Montgomery
Field.
4)
The City of oceaside operates Oceanside Municipal
Airport .
5) SANDAG is designated by the State of california on behalf
of the Federal Department of Transportation as the
"Metropolitan Planning Organi<!:ation" and serves as the
regional transportation planning agency in San Diego
County. SANOAG has taken a lead role in studying where
a new international airport should be sited.
. Clearly, these agencies, as the airport operators and planners
in the region, all have a vested interest in airport develop-
ment in the region and should be invited to participate in a
San Diego county Regional Airport Authority Exploration
Committee to determine the organi<!:ational structure most
suitable for a San Diego San Diego County Regional Airport
Authority.
working together, these agencies should examine the issues
surrounding the creation of such an authority in order to form
a mutually beneficial agreement which will serve the best
interests of all citizens in the County of San Diego. The
Committee would be charged with identifying and recommending
the moat appropriate organizational strUcture for a San Diego
county Regional Airport Authority with" responsibility to
provide for the region's in~egrated air transport needs.
3,A-~
..
~i.! LI\l1 f bKU Ur ~UrKVK~ I t.L I'~O. 01 '=,-~:.> (-4U,i:.>
..Juri lU..:ll 11 . '-tV I~U .0""... I.VV
I,)
;
L
,,-.
~/
SUBJECT: san Diego County Regional Airport Authority Exploration
committee
:It is in the best interest of San Diego County and its
residents for the County to continue its active participation
in airport issues:
.
The County serves as the only regional government, with
its elected officials representing citizens of all 18
cities and the unincorporated area.
SANDAG has recognized the County's planning and land use
responsibilities in airport siting.
The County has shared responsibilities tor coordinating
and/or providing road/rail access to and from the
proposed airports.
The County owns and operates eight airports in the region
and has extensive experience in airport management.
.
.
.
.
The County is the state appointed responsible agency for
issues relating to noise problems surrounding airports
and has the authority to designate "noise problem"
airports County-wide.
There is precedence for County participation in incor-
porated area-based public agencies, including:
-f-
Metropolitan Transit Development Board, regional
surface transportation authority.
2) Metropolitan Waste Water Authority.
1)
3) Regional air pollution control.
By actively participating in the airport issue through the
establishment of a San Diego County Regional Airport Ailthority
Exploration committee, the county would maintain a further
role as a charter member of the San Diego County Regional
Airport Authority.
4
a ~Il - b
"'.I...-' .....1 ~ I I .....Jl',.;,.; '-"
L
"--
L-
,-,''-',
73
SUBJECT: san Diego County Regional Airport Authority Exploration
COlDIllittee
SAN OIaGO COUNTY REGIONAL AIRPORT AUTHORITY EXPLORATION
COMMITTEB'S KAXB UP
The San Di8go County Regional Airport Authority Exploration
Committee would be made up of seven appointed citizen
representatives (not elected officials): two fro~ the County
of San Diego, two from the city of San Diego, one each from
the city of oceanside, the San Diego Unified port District and
the San Oieqo Association of Governments. The representa-
tives should ~e selected so that they bring a broad spectrum
of expertise to the committee necessary to developing
recommendations regarding the formation of'a San Diego County
Regional Airport Authority. Examples of desirable fields of
expertise include: finance, law, a~r transport, real estate,
lnterna~ional commerce and local business. The appropriate
staff support would be provided by the participating aqencles.
TtMBLINB
It is intended that each agency appoint its respective
representative(s) to the San Diego County Regional Airport
Authority Exploration committee by August 1, 1991. The
committee would then meet as often as determined necessary in
order to make their recommendations on the issues surrounding
creation of an Airport Authority by December 1, 1991.
Respectfully submitted,
LEON
Board of
5
3i11f - :r-
SD CNTY BRD OF SUPRVRS TEL NO.619-557-4025
L
L
L
Jun 10.91 17:40 No.031 P.OS
73
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
AGENDA ITEM
XNFORMATION SHEET
SUBJECT:
Airport Authority Exploration Committee
SUPV. DrST.: ~l
90UNTY COUNSBL APPROVAL: Form and Leqality
( )Standard Form ( )Ordinance
(x)Yes ( )N/A
( )Resolution
7lUDXTOR l\PPROV1L:
(x)N/A
( )Yes
4 VOTES: ()Yes
(X)No
I'INANC1:AL XANAGZMBNT RBVrB1U
( ) Yes
(x)No
CONTRACT UV1:B1f PANEL:
( ) Approved
(x)N/A
~ONTRACT NUMBBReS)I N/A
PRBVXOUS RELEVANT BOARD ACTION: 6/5/90 (.66 << 67) Board approved
appointment of Supervisor williams to serve as the County represen-
tative on SANDAG airport deleqation charged with entering into
discussions with the United States and Mexico governments to
determine the feasibility of a binational airport. 1/29/91 (#75)
supervisor Williams reappointed to airport delegation.
BOARD POLXCXBS APPL~CABLB: None
,
CITIZEN COMMITTEB STATEMENT: N/A
CONCURRENCBlS): None
CONTACT PERSON: Adrienne Brodeur, S30/531-5544, A-SOO
ORraINATING DEPARTMENT:
Fourth supervisorial District
DBPARTMENT AUTHORIZBD aBPRBSENTATZVE
MEETZNG DATE
6
3 (,A- - i
SUBJECf: AB 1040 (HAYS)
June 18, 1991
There is a proposal - AB 1040 (Hays) to limit salaries granted by local
agencies (counties, schools and cities). In concept, it would limit salary
increases to whatever the State gives its employees.
If local employee salaries are increased above that of the State, the State
would reduce any State appropriation to the local agency by that amount.
Currently there are no salary increases proposed by the State of California.
This proposal would not have an impact on merit increases or promotions.
Cities would be unable to make any changes to PERS - i. e. pick up employee
portion of PERS.
oppose.. und
Council Acontact Senate members
This is time sensitive, staff recommends
ASAP based on the following reasons:
1. As a Charter City, this violates our home rule authority to set
employee wages and benefits. This may be unconstitutional.
2. Violates existing MOU agreements with bargaining units which
would be detrimental to the meet and confer process.
This item is not on the agenda.
City staff was informed of this measure late this afternoon. Due to its time
sensitive nature, staff recommends Council authorize staff to proceed.
AS 1040 is addressed by the Legislative Program thus requires no Council
action.
~
--Ii!'"
~
1
RESOLUTION NO. 16227
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA FINDING THAT THE USE OF TAXES
ALLOCATED FROM THE SOUTHWEST REDEVELOPMENT
PROJECT AREA, AS AMENDED BY THE FIRST
AMENDMENT TO THE SOUTHWEST REDEVELOPMENT
PLAN, FOR THE PURPOSE OF HOUSING OUTSIDE OF
THE PROJECT AREA WILL BE BENEFIT TO THE
PROJECT
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Chula vista (the
City) has prepared a proposed First Amendment to the
Redevelopment Plan for the Southwest Redevelopment Project (the
Project) and Project Area (the Project Area), which would result
in the allocation of taxes from the Project Area, as amended by
the First Amendment to the Project, to the Agency for the
purposes of redevelopment: and
WHEREAS, section 33334.2 of the California Community
Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code sections 33000 et.
seq.) requires that not less than twenty percent (20%) of all
taxes so allocated to be used by the Agency for improving,
increasing, and preserving the city's supply of low and moderate
income housing: and
WHEREAS, section 33334.2(g) of the ~fAfornia Community
Redevelopment Law provides that the Agency ~ use such funds
outside of the Project Area if a finding is made by resolution of
the Agency and the City Council of the City of Chula vista that
such use will be of benefit to the Project Area before the
Redevelopment Plan is adopted.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. That the use of taxes allocated from the
Project Area, as amended by the proposed First Amendment, for the
purpose of improving, increasing and preserving the community's
supply of low and moderate income housing available at affordable
housing costs outside the project Area and within the city of
Chula vista will be of benefit to the Project.
Pre"~ted by ife! a
~L..~~~. I~
Chris Salomone
Community Development Director
Oh"'*o2O%<.' I q I
r
I
RESOLUTION NO. 16??R
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA CERTIFYING THE MITIGATED NEGATIVE
DECLARATION FOR THE FIRST AMENDMENT TO THE
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE SOUTHWEST
REDEVELOPMENT PLAN, CITY OF CHULA VISTA
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, the Chula vista Redevelopment Agency (the Agency)
has initiated a redevelopment program through the adoption of the
Redevelopment Plan for the Southwest Redevelopment Project Area
(the Project Area); and
WHEREAS, the Agency and the city Council of the City of
Chula vista (the City council) have consented to a joint public
hearing for consideration of the proposed First Amendment to the
Redevelopment Plan for the Southwest Redevelopment proj ect Area
(the First Amendment); and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to undertake an environmental
evaluation prior to adoption of the proposed First Amendment; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the California Environmental Quality
Act and State EIR Guidelines, a Mitigated Negative Declaration
has been prepared on the proposed First Amendment; and
WHEREAS, after expiration of the period for public review
and comment on the Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for
the proposed First Amendment; and
WHEREAS, prior to considering the First Amendment, the
Agency must determine whether the Mitigated Negative Declaration
has been prepared in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act and State EIR Guidelines; and
WHEREAS, the city Council has reviewed the Mitigated Negative
Declaration an all proceedings incident thereto:
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1.
The above recitals are all true and correct.
SECTION 2.
as follows:
a. q!8.e fhe Mitigated Negative Declaration has been
prepared and completed in the time, form and manner required by
the California Environmental Quality Act and State EIR
Guidelines; and
The City Council hereby finds and determines
chula\ccmilapp
-1-
~ Jq7-
b. That approval of the First Amendment should be
subject to such mitigation measures as may be set forth in the
Mitigated Negative Declaration; and
c. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been
reviewed and considered prior to consideration of the proposed
First Amendment.
SECTION 3. The City Council hereby approves the
Mitigated Negative Declaration subject to the finding specified
in SECTION 2 of this resolution.
c~ ~.~~
form by
Presented by
Chris Salomone
Community Development Director
Bruce Boog<1'ra
City Attorney
chula\ccmltapp
1C/9
-2-