HomeMy WebLinkAboutrda min 1990/12/04 MINtJ]~S OF AN ADJOURNED MEETING OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
Tuesday, December 4, 1990 City Council Chambers
7:40 p.m. Public Services Building
CALL TO ORDER
1. ROLL CALL:
PRESENT: Members Malcolm, Moore, Nader, Rindone, and Chairman McCandliss
ALSO PRESENT: John D. Goss, Director; Bruce M. Boogaard, Agency Attorney;, and Beverly A.
Authelet, City Clerk
2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
MSUC (Malcolm/Moore) to approve the minutes of October 9, November I and 15, 1991 as presented.
3. RESOLUTION 1140 ADOPTING A CONFLICT OF INTEREST CODE
MSUC (Nader/Malcolm) to continue Resolution 1140 in order to obtain employee input and to be brought
back to the Agency in conjunction with the Resolution for Council approval.
4. REPORT APPEAL OF DESIGN REVIE3fi/ COMMIFtI~E REQUIREMENT FOR THE
SUDBERRY PROPERTIES INCORPORATED INDUSTRIAL BDILDING PROJECT LOCATED AT 1675
BRANDYWINE AVENUE
Director Goss stated staff recommendation was to consider the appeal of the Design Review Committee and
support their recommendation. They have reviewed the project twice and he did not see a reason why that
should be reversed.
~Member Malcolm stated many of the changes had been made in the field with staff informed during the
construction phase. He questioned whether the design feature (window) could be seen from Brandywine
Avenue.
Luis Hernandez, Assistant Planner, responded that the applicant had worked with the staff to get this item
resolved. They had been advised prior to the construction permit that this item had not been approved.
Larry l~doha, Ware Malcolmb Architectural Planning, representing Sudberry Properties Incorporated, gave
an overview of the project. There is no visibility of the building from the street and therefore those features
would not be predominant.
MS (Nader/Nader) to grant the appeal of the Design Review Committee requirement for the Sudberry
Properties Incorporated induswial building project located at 1675 Brandywine Avenue.
Member Rindone felt that in support of the motion it was critical to let the Design Review Committee that
there was an alternative option as presented tonight.
VOTE ON MOTION: approved 4-1-0 with Member Moore voting no.
Minutes Page 2 December 4, 1990
MSUC (McCandliss/Nader) to send a follow-up letter to the Design Review Gomm~ttee explaining the
position the Agency took and asking for any additional comments they would like to offer.
5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - None.
6. DIRECTOR'S REPORT - None.
7. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT - None.
8. MEMBER'S COMMENTS
a. Member Nader:
It should be stressed to the Boards and Commissions that whenever an item comes before the Agency or
Council, a member of the Board or Commission should be present.
ADJOURNMENT OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AT 8:00 P.M. to the regularly scheduled meeting of
Thursday, December 20th at 4:00 p.m.
Respectfully submitted,
BEVERLY/L AUTHELET, CMC, City Clerk
by:
Vicki C. Soderquist, Deputy City Clerk