HomeMy WebLinkAboutrda min 1990/08/08 SPECIAL I~mRTING OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGKNCY
OF THE ~dl'lY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
Tuesday, August 8, 1990 Council Chambers
10:35 p.m. Public Services Building
CALL TO ORDER
1. ROLL GALL:
PRESENT: Members Malcolm, Moore, Nader, and Chairman Cox
ABSENT: Member McCandliss
ALSO PRESENT: John D. Goss, Director; Bruce M. Boogaard, Agency Attorney; and Beverly
Authelet, City Clerk
BUSINESS
2. RESOLL1TION 1110 GRANTING AL1THORITY TO STAFF TO UNDERTAKE STUDIES FOR THE
PURPOSE OF SELECTING A SITE IN THE CITY FOR THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A HIGH RETAIL SAt.K~ TAX
GENERATING LAND USE SUCH AS AN AUerO PARK, OTHER THAN EAST 'IF' STREET, PREPARING
NECESSARY PLANS AND AG~, AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS THER~OR (4/S'S VOTE
Member Nader stated due to the location of his home to one of the existing sites, he would normally abstain
from voting. Because the Resolution would take a 4/S's vote, he would vote if the Agency Attorney '
determined he should under the Rule of Necessity.
Agency Attorney Boogaard responded the Rule of Neressity would be operative.
RESOLUTION 1110 OFFERED BY CHAIRMAN COX, reading of the text was waived, passed and approved
4-0-1 with Member MeCandliss absent.
3. RESOLUTION 1111 APPROPRIATING FUNDS AND APPROVING AG~ TO NEGOTIATE
FOR RIGHT OF ~SAL WITH GITY OF CHULA VISTA FOR THE CORPORATION YARD PROPERTY (4/5'S
VOTE REQUIRF~)
RESOLUTION 1111 OI'i"P2RED BY MEMBER MOORE, reading of the text was waived.
Agency Attorney Boogaard stated the item had been continued on the City Council agenda and questioned
whether it should be continued from the Agency agenda.
Director Goss responded that the Council item was pulled due to the terms of the bid, but any possible
changes ro the agreement would be the possible lowering of figures.
Agency Attorney Boogaard responded that the Agency could take action on the Resolution.
VOTE ON RESOLUTION 1111: approved 4-0-1 with Member McCandliss absent.
MINUTES -2- August 21, 1990
4. ~ AGRRRMENT REGARDING THE CHANNEL WORK PORTION OF THE CONSTRUCTION
OF PHASE I IMPROVEMENTS OF MEMORIAL PARK
Agency Attorney Boogaard stated the Agency needed to authorize a settlement agreement to an aspect of
a construction project in Memorial Park. The item came to his attention this mon~ing and staff had been
able to reach terms to recommend for approval to settle the construction dispute. The urgency of the matter
is that if it is delayed until the next Agency meeting, there were substantial costs that could be incurred and
losses to be borne by the Agency or contractor that could be avoided ff acted upon immediately.
MSC (Cox/Moore) to add the settlement agreement to the Redevelopment Agency agenda, approved ~0~1
with Member McCandliss absent.
Agency Attorney Boogaard advised the Agency that in the Memorial Park project, 180 feet of concrete, which
is to appear as natural riverbed, had been laid and is not satisfactory to the Parks Department and does not
meet the intent of what they felt the bid specifications provided for. The agreement creates a program to
test the contractors ability to comply with what the City feels is aesthetically required, by taking an
additional S6 feet and pouring concrete pursuant to more speriflc design criteria. If the second 56 feet is
acceptable, then the City will permit the contractor to develop in increments, thereafter, the rest of the 800
feet of concrete in the drainage channel. If it is not acceptable, the contractor is required to remove the 56
feet, and the City reserves all it's rights to claim damages or violations on each side, both by the Agency and
the contractor. It is hoped that this will avoid a major problem in having to terminate and rebid the job
which would result in further costs, He requested a minute resolution approving the agreement and
authorizing the Chairman to execute the agreement.
MSC (Malcolm/Cox) to approve the settlement agreement and authorize the Chairman to execute, approved
4-0-1 with Member McCandliss absent.
Agency Attorney Boogaard requested that if there were minor changes to the agreement, that he be given
the authority to make non-substantial changes to the agreement in order to accomplish the objectives.
MSC (Cox/Nader) to authorize the Chairman to approve any non-substantial changes in the agreement as
recommended by the Agency Attorney, approved 4-0-1 with Member MeCandliss absent.
S. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
Paul L. Greene, expressed concern over past legal action taken by the City of Chula Vista against him and
requested a meeting in Closed Session to discuss this matter.
6. DIRECTOR'S REPORT(S) - None
7. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT(S) - None
8. MEMBER'S COMMENTS - None
MINUTES -3- August 21, 1990
The Redevelopment Agency met in a closed session at 10:45 p.m. discuss:
The potential acquisition of property pursuant to Government Gode Section 54956.8 ~ 221 Third
Avenue (Jacob and Herbert Wenig, owners)
ADJOURNMENT AT 11:10 P.M. to the Redevelopment Agency/Planning Commission scheduled for Thursday,
August 30, 1990 at 7:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers.
Respectfully submitted,
BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, GMC, Gity Clerk
Vicki C. Soderquist, Deputy Cii~lerk