HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007/03/06 Item 5
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA STATEMENT
~'Yf:. CITY OF
~~ CHUlA VISTA
03/06/07 Item ~
ITEM TITLE:
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA,
APPROPRIATING FUNDS FROM THE TRAFFIC
SIGNAL FUND FOR COSTS INVOLVED WITH
INSTALLATION OF A TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT MAIN
STREET AND AUTO PARK PLACE
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
~
CITY ENGINEER c:,. I ;({
INTERIM CITY MANAGER 'JI
4/5THS VOTE: YES X NO
BACKGROUND
In 2003, the City of Chula Vista approved a development including an auto park and
other auto related businesses by Mr. Hooper Knowlton on the north side of Main Street at
Auto Park Place (Auto Park North). In 2004, the City approved an auto park
development by Sunroad Enterprises on the south side of Main Street directly across
from Auto Park North (Auto Park East). As a result of these developments, a new traffic
signal was needed at the intersection of Main Street and Auto Park Place. Tonight, City
Council will consider the appropriation of funds from the City's Traffic Signal Fund for
the City's share of signalizing the four-legged intersection. Total project cost was
initially paid by Sunroad Enterprises with an understanding that reimbursements would
follow from the City and the developer of Auto Park North upon project completion.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW: The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed
the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act
(CEQA) and has determined that the activity, appropriation of funds, is not a "Project" as
defined under Section l5378(b)(5) of the State CEQA Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to
Section l5060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines the activity is not subject to CEQA.
Thus, no environmental review is necessary.
RECOMMENDATION
That Council approve the Resolution:
5-1
03/06/07, Item~
Page 2 of3
1. Appropriating funds in the amount of $54,183.32 from the Traffic Signal Fund to
reimburse the developer (Sunroad Enterprises) for the cost of installing a traffic signal at
Main Street and Auto Park Place.
BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
Not applicable.
DISCUSSION
In August 2003, the City conditionally approved Tentative Parcel Map 03-03 for Auto
Park North located on the north side of Main Street east of Brandywine Avenue. The
developer, Mr. Hooper Knowlton, was required to install many public street
improvements including traffic signals at the two intersections (Auto Park Place and Auto
Park Avenue) along the project frontage at Main Street. Mr. Knowlton entered into a
Parcel Map Improvement Agreement to install these public improvements within two
years of the date ofthe agreement (by August 26,2005).
In August 2004, the City conditionally approved Tentative Parcel Map 01-08 for Auto
Park East located on the south side of Main Street opposite Auto Park North. The
developer, Mr. Fred Borst, was also required to install traffic signals (along with other
improvements to Main Street) at Auto Park Place and Auto Park A venue in the event that
these traffic signals were not operational at the time the developer wished to obtain
building permits. Mr. Borst did not enter into a Parcel Map Improvement Agreement nor
did he apply for a final parcel map, but he sold one of his existing parcels to Sunroad
Enterprises who then obtained approval from the City in May 2005 to build the Toyota
dealership within Auto Park East. The Tentative Parcel Map approved with Mr. Borst
has since expired. However, as part of the Toyota dealership approval, Sunroad
Enterprises was required to construct its associated public street improvements along the
Main Street frontage together with the traffic signal at Auto Park Place ifMr. Knowlton
did not install the signal in time for Toyota dealership building permits.
Although Mr. Knowlton's Parcel Map Improvement Agreement and associated bonds
guaranteed the construction of public improvements including the traffic signal at Auto
Park Place, the work was not completed within the required two-year construction period.
On September 21, 2005, the City sent a default letter to Mr. Knowlton stating that all the
public improvements must be completed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer or the
City would proceed to make demand upon his bonds. By mid-December 2005, there was
little activity at the Auto Park North job site and the City sent a second default letter to
Mr. Knowlton. This time the City requested that Mr. Knowlton enter into an Amendment
to the original Parcel Map Improvement Agreement together with submitting new
construction bonds and a cash deposit of $115,000 for half of the traffic signal at Auto
Park Place.
Mr. Knowlton responded to the second default letter by submitting a cash deposit of
$115,000 for half the estimated costs of the traffic signal but did not sign the Amended
Parcel Map Improvement Agreement nor post new bonds. Soon construction activity at
5-2
03/06/07, Item2
Page 3 of3
Mr. Knowlton's job site accelerated and therefore staff expected that the required public
improvements would be completed. Staff did not pursue the Amendment to the Parcel
Map Improvement Agreement.
Meanwhile, the Toyota dealership constructed their street improvements on the south side
of Main Street and when it became apparent Mr. Knowlton would not install the traffic
signal at Auto Park Place in time for the anticipated opening of the Toyota dealership,
Sumoad Enterprises proceeded with installing the signal with an estimated total project
cost of $230,000. The City agreed to contribute one-quarter of the cost with Sumoad
Enterprises also contributing one-quarter of the cost, leaving Mr. Knowlton responsible
for one-half of the cost to be covered by the $115,000 cash deposit provided in response
to the second default letter.
All work was completed and the signal was activated in late December 2006. Sumoad
Enterprises has submitted an invoice from their traffic signal contractor in the amount of
$216,733.29 and requested reimbursement from the Auto Park North developer and the
City per verbal agreement with the City Engineer in November 2005. With Sumoad
Enterprises paying $54,183.32 (25%), the remainder would be reimbursed; $108,366.64
(50%) from Mr. Knowlton's cash deposit and $54,183.32 (25%) from the City's Traffic
Signal Fund which is consistent with Council Policy 478-01 allowing use of these funds
when a significant benefit to the general public is identified. This project meets these
criteria. The difference between Mr. Knowlton's cash deposit of $115,000.00 and the
50% reimbursement amount is $6,633.36. This remainder amount will be transferred into
Mr. Knowlton's development account, which is in deficit by approximately $25,000.00.
DECISION MAKER CONFLICT
Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council and has found no property
holdings within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property, which is the subject of this
action.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no impact to the General Fund. Sumo ad Enterprises is contributing 25% of the
total cost, the City's 25% ($54,183.32) reimbursement to Sumo ad Enterprises will be
funded with available Traffic Signal funds and the remaining 50% ($108,366.64)
reimbursement will be funded by the Auto Park North developer's deposit account with
the remainder in that account ($6,633.36) will be transferred into that developer's other
account which is in deficit by approximately $25,000.
Prepared by: Silvester Evetovich, Principal Civil Engineer, Engineering Department
J: IEngineerlAG ENDA ICAS2007103-06-07ISunroadReimbursement.doc
5-3
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROPRIATING FUNDS FROM
THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL FUND FOR COSTS INVOLVED
WITH INST ALLA TION OF A TRAFFIC SIGNAL AT MAIN
STREET AND AUTO PARK PLACE.
WHEREAS, in 2003, the Chula Vista City Council approved a development including an
auto park and other auto related businesses by Mr. Hooper Knowlton on the north side of Main
Street at Auto Park Place (Auto Park North); and
WHEREAS, in 2004, the City approved an auto park development by Sunroad
Enterprises on the south side of Main Street directly across from Auto Park North (Auto Park
East); and
WHEREAS, as a result of these developments, a new traffic signal was needed at the
intersection of Main Street and Auto Park Place; and
WHEREAS, Sunroad Enterprises installed the traffic signal and paid the total cost for the
signal with an understanding that it would be partially reimbursed by the City and the developer
of Auto Park North upon project completion.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista
that it approves the appropriation of $54,183.32 to the Other Expenses Category of the Traffic
Signal fund from the available balance of the fund for the City's share of the installation of the
traffic signal at Main Street and Auto Park Place.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
~~~J ;U:~
Ann Moore
City Attorney
Scott Tulloch
City Engineer
H:\E:N(jINEER\RES()S\Resos20(J7\()3-0()~07\SLlllroadReil11bursel1lent Revised by EC.doc
5-4