Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRDA Packet 1994/02/15 Tuesday, February 15, l.994 6:00 p.m. [Immediately eoDowing City Coonell meeting.] Council Chambers Public Servi.... Building .................................................................................................................................................................................................................................... . . . . . . . . COMPLIANCE WITH AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT The City of Chu/a Vista, in complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), request individuals who may need special accommodation to access, attend, and/or participate in a City meeting, activity, or service contact the Secretary to the Redevelopment Agency at (619) 691-5047 for specific information on existing resources/or programs that may be available for such accommodation. Please call at least forty-eight hours in advance for meetings and five days in advance for scheduled services and activities. California Relay Service is available for the hearing impaired. ..............,....,................mmm..mmmmm....."mmm................,.....,.............,..,...............mmmmmmmm............m...........m.....m..m...........m...........m. CALL TO ORDER Members Horton Chairman Nader . Fox . Moore . Rindone , and 1. ROLL CALL: 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: February 1, 1994 CONSENT CALENDAR (Items 3 through 4) 3. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: None Submitted. 4. REPORT STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING THE PREPARATION AND PROCESSING OF A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FOR THE LOWER SWEETWATER VALLEY AREA AND REPORT ON NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING--On 12114/93 Council directed staff to conduct a neighborhood meeting for the purpose of discussing a number of proposals involving the Lower Sweetwater Valley Area. Staff held the meeting and the City is now considering preparation and processing of a General Plan Amendment for the Lower Sweetwater Valley Area to best accomplish the goals and objectives of the City's General Plan. Staff recommends that the Agency direct staff to prepare a draft General Plan Amendment for the Lower Swee1water Valley Area. (Community Development Director) * * END OF CONSENT CALENDAR * * PUBLIC HEARINGS Thefollowing items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. Jfyou wish to speak to any item, please fill out the "Request to Speak Form" and submit it to the City Clerk or Secrelary to the Redevelopment Agency prior to the meeting. (Complete the green form to speak in favor of the slaff recommendation; complete the pinkform to speak in opposition to the staff recommendation.) Comments are limited to five minutes per individual. AGENDA -2- FEBRUARY 15, 1994 5.A AGENCY PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A REQUEST FROM ENERGY AUTO RECYCLING FOR THE PURPOSE OF ESTABLISHING A BUSINESS FOR THE AUTO STORAGE, WRECKING AND DISMANTLING AT 793-A ENERGY WAY, ClIULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA; PARCEL BEING LOCATED IN THE OT A Y VALLEY ROAD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (SUPO-93-03)--The land uses on the subject parcels were authorized by Conditional Use Permit #PCC- 73-27 in 1973 as part of the Otay Industrial Park and expired in 1986. Under the Otay Valley Road Redevelopment Plan, formed iu 1983, the land uses allowed for this area is Limited Industrial/Research. In order to continue the existiug land uses, these being the storage, maintenance and repair of heavy equipment, the impounding, storage and dismantling, and wreckiug of automobiles, a Special Permit is required under the Redevelopment Plan. Staff recommends approval of the resolntions. The DubUc hearinl! was oDened and continued from the meetinl! of Februarv 1. i994 to this meetinl! (Februarv 15. 1994). (Commuuity Development Director) AGENCY RESOLUTION 1372 MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS AND APPROVING SPECIAL PERMIT TO ENERGY AUTO RECYCLING FOR CERTAIN AUTO WRECKING USES AT 783-A ENERGY WAY, CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA; PARCEL BEING LOCATED WITHIN THE OTAY VALLEY ROAD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA B.AGENCY PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A REQUEST FROM TOWN AUTO RECYCLING FOR THE PURPOSE OF ESTABLISHING A BUSINESS FOR AUTO STORAGE, WRECKING AND DISMANTLING AT 793-B ENERGY WAY, CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA; PARCEL BEING LOCATED IN THE OTAYVALLEY ROAD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (SUPO-93-04) RESOLUTION 1373 MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS AND APPROVING SPECIAL PERMIT TO TOWN AUTO RECYCLING FOR CERTAIN DESIGNATED AUTO WRECKING USES AT 793-B ENERGY WAY, CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA; PARCEL BEING LOCATED WITHIN THE OTA Y VALLEY ROAD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA C.AGENCY PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A REQUEST FROM ALL-Z AUTO RECYCLING FOR THE PURPOSE OF ESTABLISHING A BUSINESS FOR AUTO STORAGE, WRECKING AND DISMANTLING AT 793-C ENERGY WAY, CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA; PARCEL BEING LOCATED IN THE OT A YV ALLEY ROAD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (SUPO-93-05) RESOLUTION 1374 MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS AND APPROVING SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALL-Z AUTO WRECKING FOR CERTAIN DESIGNATED AUTO WRECKING USES AT 793-C ENERGY WAY, CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA; PARCEL BEING LOCATED WITHIN THE OTA Y VALLEY ROAD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA D.AGENCY PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A REQUEST FROM JAY JUSTUS FOR THE PURPOSE OF ESTABLISHING A BUSINESS FOR AUTO STORAGE, WRECKING AND DISMANTLING AT 891 ENERGY WAY, CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA; PARCEL BEING LOCATED IN THE OTAY VALLEY ROAD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (SUPO-93-06) AGENDA -3- FEBRUARY 15, 1994 RESOLUTION 1375 MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS AND APPROVING SPECIAL PERMIT TO JAY JUSTUS FOR THE PURPOSE OF ESTABLISHING A BUSINESS FOR CERTAIN DESIGNATED AUTO WRECKING USES AT 891 ENERGY WAY, CIUlLA VISTA, CALIFORNIA; PARCEL BEING LOCATED WITHIN THE OTA Y VALLEY ROAD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA ORAL COMMUNICATIONS This is an opportunity for the general public to oddress the Redevelopment Agency on any subject mntter within the Agency's jurisdiction that is not an item on this agenda. (State law, however, generally prohibits the Agency from deliberating or taking action on any issues not included on the posted agenda.) /fyou wish to address the Agency on such a subject, please complete the yellow "Request to Speak Under Oral Communications Form" and submit it to the City Clerk or Secretary to the Redevelopment Agency prior to the meeting. Those who wish to speak, please give your name and oddress for record purposes and follow up action. Your time is limited to three minutes per speaker. ACTION ITEMS The items listed in this section of the agenda are expected to elicit substantial discussions and deliberations by the Agency, staff, or members of the general public. The items will be considered individually by the Agency and staff recommendations mny in certain cases be presented in the alternative. Those who wish to speak, please fill out a "Request to Speak Form" and submit it to the City Clerk or the Secretary to the Redevelopment Agency prior to the meeting. Public comments are limited to five minutes. None submitted. ITEMS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR This is the time the Redevelopment Agency will discuss item, which have been removed from the Consent Calendar. Agenda items pulled at the request of the public will be considered prior to those pulled by Agency members. Public comments are limited to five minutes per individual. OTHER BUSINESS 6. EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR'S REPORT Schedule of Meetings. 7. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT 8. MEMBERS' COMMENTS * * * * * * * The meeting adjourned at: p.m. to the Regular Meeting of the Redevelopment Agency on Tuesday, March 1, 1994 at 4:00 p.m., immediately following the City Council meeting, Council Chambers, Public Services Building. le:1 WP51 IAGENCY\AGENDASI02-15-94. AGD] This ,age intentionally left blank. MINUTES OF A JOINT MEETING OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY/ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA Tuesday, February 1, 1994 5:45 p.m. Ci1y Council Chambers Public Services Building CALL TO ORDER 1. ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Agency/Council Members Horton, Fox, Moore, Rindone, and Chairman/Mayor Nader ALSO PRESENT: John D. Goss, Director/City Manager; Bruce M. Boogaard, Agency/City Attorney; and Berlin Bosworth, Secretary to the Agency 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: January 25, 1994 MSUC (Fox/Moore) to approve the minutes of January 25, 1994 as presented. CONSENT CALENDAR (Item pulled: 4) 3. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: None Submitted. 4.A AGENCY RESOLUTION 1388 AUTHORIZING STAFF TO TAKE ALL NECESSARY STEPS TO (1) COMPLY WITH THE TERMS OF THE SEMI-EXCLUSIVE NEGOTIATING AND COVENANTS AGREEMENT WITH NATIONAL A VENUE ASSOCIATES AND GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FOR THE POSSIBLE DEVELOPMENT OF A COMMUNITY SHOPPING CENTER PROJECT AT THE NORTHWEST QUADRANT OF FIFfH A VENUE AND C STREET; AND (2) PRESENT THE PROJECT, PROPOSED ALTERNATIVE PROJECTS, AND ALL MATTERS RELATED THERETO TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR CONSIDERATION--The Agency approved a Semi-Exclusive Negotiating and Covenants Agreement with National Avenue Associates and Gatlin Development Company on 12/14/93 so as to preserve the Agency's ability to financially assist, if necessary, a commercial development project at the site and to bind 1he developer to apply for and pursue the entitlements necessary for the project and negotiate a Development Agreement with the Agency. The attached resolutions ("Omnibus Resolutions") are necessary in order to comply with the terms of the Semi-Exclusive Negotiating and Covenants Agreement and expedi1iously evaluate and present the project and any other alterative project(s) that may be proposed to the Council and Agency for consideration. Staff recommends approval of the resolutions. (Community Development Director) Pulled from the Consent Calendar. B. COUNCIL RESOLUTION 17381 AUTHORIZING STAFF TO TAKE ALL NECESSARY STEPS TO (I) COMPLY WITH THE TERMS OF THE SEMI-EXCLUSIVE NEGOTIATING AND COVENANTS AGREEMENT WITH NATIONAL A VENUE ASSOCIATES AND GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY FOR THE POSSIBLE DEVELOPMENT OF A COMMUNITY SHOPPING CENTER PROJECT AT THE NORTHWEST QUADRANT OF FIFfH A VENUE AND C STREET; AND (2) PRESENT THE PROJECT, PROPOSED ALTERNATIVE PROJECTS, AND ALL MATTERS RELATED THERETO TO THE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL FOR CONSIDERATION Chairman/Mayor Nader stated in reviewing the agreement adopted last December it appeared to him that some of the provisions of that agreement were different than what he had understood 1hem to be at 1he time Council voted. He was somewhat concerned about that because he voted for the agreement only because Council had been told that ). -/ Minutes February I, 1994 Page 2 they had to do so right1hen in order to preserve certain options under State law that would otherwise expire January 1st. That vote was not a commitmen1 to any particular project, it was certainly not a commitment to a public subsidy of the project. In his view the determination of those issues was still in suspension. His concern with the resolution was not with actual terms, but with how it may be interpreted by staff. He would feel more comfortable if staff could tell him that adoption of the resolution would not result in an exclusive focus on one possible project to the exclusion of any other projects that could be legally or economically viable. Agency/City Attorney Boogaard stated the Agency/Council authorized the signature of a semi-exclusive agreement. In that regard, the City for six months would be precluded from negotiating with anyone but owner participants on the site. He questioned if it was staffs understanding that it was one year semi-exclusive. Lyle Haynes, Principal Community Development Specialist, responded that it was for six months and they had the ability to apply for an extension of six months. Agency/City Attorney Boogaard stated it was six and six and it was not mandatory that the extension ,be granted. Chairman/Mayor Nader stated it was his understanding that other proposals could still be discussed if they involved any of the property owners or developers that were parties to the agreement. Chris Salomone, Director of Conununity Development, responded that was correct. Chairman/Mayor Nader questioned whether it was staffs intent to still be open to such possibilities if the resolution was passed. Mr. Salomone responded that staff would consider any owner participation proposal. Chairman/Mayor Nader stated with that understanding he would support the resolutions. RESOLUTIONS 1388 AND 17381 OFFERED BY CHAIRMAN/MAYOR NADER, reading of the text was waived. Agency/City Attorney Boogaard emphasized that the resolution obligated the Agency/City to consider all owner participants that wanted to propose a plan. VOTE ON RESOLUTIONS 1388 AND 17381: approved unanimously. MSUC (Nader/Moore) to direct staff to provide a report to the Council by June as to any potential projects that may have been advanced to staff as possibilities. · · END OF CONSENT CALENDAR · · PUBLIC HEARINGS 5.A AGENCY PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A REQUEST FROM ENERGY AUTO RECYCLING FOR THE PURPOSE OF ESTABLISHING A BUSINESS FOR THE AUTO STORAGE, WRECKING AND DISMANTLING AT 793-A ENERGY WAY, CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA; PARCEL BEING LOCATED IN THE OT A Y V ALLEY ROAD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (SUPO-93-03)--The land uses on the subject parcels were authorized by Conditional Use Permit #PCC-73-27 in 1973 as part of the Otay Industrial Park and expired in 1986. Under the Otay Valley Road Redevelopment Plan, formed in 1983, the land uses allowed for this area is Limited Industrial/Research. In order 10 continue the existing land uses, 1hese being the storage, maintenance and repair of heavy equipment, the impounding, storage and dismantling, and wrecking of automobiles, J~2 Minutes February 1, 1994 Page 3 a Special Permit is required under the Redevelopment Plan. Staff recommends the public hearing be continued to the meeting of February IS, 1994 at 6:00 p.m. (Community Development Director) AGENCY RESOLUTION 1372 MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS AND APPROVING SPECIAL PERMIT TO ENERGY AUTO RECYCLING FOR CERTAIN AUTO WRECKING USES AT 783-A ENERGY WAY, CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA; PARCEL BEING LOCATED WITHIN THE OTAY VALLEY ROAD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA B. AGENCY PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A REQUEST FROM TOWN AUTO RECYCLING FOR THE PURPOSE OF ESTABLISHING A BUSINESS FOR AUTO STORAGE, WRECKING AND DISMANTLING AT 793-B ENERGY WAY, CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA; PARCEL BEING LOCATED IN THE OTAY VALLEY ROAD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (SUPO-93-04) RESOLUTION 1373 MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS AND APPROVING SPECIAL PERMIT TO TOWN AUTO RECYCLING FOR CERTAIN DESIGNATED AUTO WRECKING USES AT 793-B ENERGY WAY, CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA; PARCEL BEING LOCATED WITHIN THE OTAY V ALLEY ROAD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA C. AGENCY PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A REQUEST FROM ALL-Z AUTO RECYCLING FOR THE PURPOSE OF ESTABLISHING A BUSINESS FOR AUTO STORAGE, WRECKING AND DISMANTLING AT 793-C ENERGY WAY, CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA; PARCEL BEING LOCATED IN THE OT A Y V ALLEY ROAD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (SUPO-93-05) RESOLUTION 1374 MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS AND APPROVING SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALL-Z AUTO WRECKING FOR CERTAIN DESIGNATED AUTO WRECKING USES AT 793-C ENERGY WAY, CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA; PARCEL BEING LOCATED WITHIN THE OTAY V ALLEY ROAD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA D. AGENCY PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A REQUEST FROM JAY JUSTUS FOR THE PURPOSE OF ESTABLISHING A BUSINESS FOR AUTO STORAGE, WRECKING AND DISMANTLING AT 891 ENERGY WAY, CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA; PARCEL BEING LOCATED IN THE OTAY VALLEY ROAD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (SUPO-93-06) RESOLUTION 1375 MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS AND APPROVING SPECIAL PERMIT TO JAY JUSTUS FOR THE PURPOSE OF ESTABLISHING A BUSINESS FOR CERTAIN DESIGNATED AUTO WRECKING USES AT 891 ENERGY WAY, CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA; PARCEL BEING LOCATED WITHIN THE OT A Y V ALLEY ROAD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA MSUC (Nader/Fox) to continue the public hearing to the meeting of 2/15/94 as recommended by staff. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None ACTION ITEMS None Submitted. ,2--3 Minutes February 1, 1994 Page 4 ITEMS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR Item pulled: 4. The minutes will reflect the published agenda order. OTHER BUSINESS 6. DIRECTOR/CITY MANAGER'S REPORT 6a. Director/City Manager Goss stated tbe report requested by Councilmember Fox on the Broadway advertising proposals would be before Council on 2/8/94. 7. CHAIRMAN/MAYOR'S REPORT - None 8. AGENCY/COUNCIL MEMBERS' COMMENTS Allencv/Council Member Moore 8a. Agency/Council Member Moore ques1ioned wbether there was a policy for the Agency/Council to receive quarterly reports on major projects. Director/City Manager Goss responded there was no quarterly report on major projects. As events happened, staff sent informational items tothe Agency/Council on major projects. ADJOURNMENT ADJOURNMENT AT 5:58 P.M. to the Regular Meeting of the Redevelopment Agency on Tuesday, February 15, 1994 at 6:00 p.m., immediately following the City Council meeting, Council Chambers, Public Services Building. by: Respectfully submitted, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, CMC. City Clerk " \,.., ~) ~2\(; ~ C.. t t., "v~ Vicki C. Soderquist. Deputy' lerk " ) J--1 ITEM TITLE: SUBMITTED BY: REVIEWED BY: REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA STATEMENT Item 1/ Meeting Date 02-15-94 REPORT - STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING THE PREPARATION AND PROCESSING OF A GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT FOR THE LOWER SWEETWATER V ALLEY AREA. REPORT ON NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING. Community Devel'!p1J].ent Director c...~. Planning DirectorVli\.> ..r Parks and Recreation Dir.f,ollrv City Manager,J~ 1%0 ~ J (4/5ths V ote: Yes _ No Xl Council Referral Number: BACKGROUND: The City has been considering the preparation and processing of a General Plan amendment for the Lower Sweetwater Valley Area in order to identify the most appropriate land uses necessary to best accomplish the goals and objectives of the City General Plan. The need to undertake such a process has been generated by recent interest in development of the subject area. Current development proposals include a Desalination facility, a Senior Housing project, a Recreation/Fun Center Sports Complex and a Veterans Home facility. On December 14, 1993 Council directed staff to conduct a neighborhood meeting for the purpose of discussing the proposed process and to introduce the development proposals to the neighborhood residents (see attached minutes). A Town Meeting was held on January 27, 1994 at Rosebank Elementary School. All property owners (totalling approximately 800) within 1,000 feet of the subject site were notified and the meeting was attended by approximately 80 people. RECOMMENDATION: That the Agency direct staff to prepare a draft General Plan amendment for the Lower Sweetwater Valley area, and return to City Council prior to preparing an Environmental Impact report. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: The draft GPA will be presented to the Parks and Recreation Commission, the Housing Advisory Commission, the Planning Commission, the Resource Conservation Commission, and the Veterans Advisory Committee for their review. DISCUSSION: CHRONOLOGY OF EVENTS On March 23, 1993 the Agency adopted a resolution which conceptually approved the donation of fourteen acres of land located in the Lower Sweetwater Valley area to the State of California, subject to environmental review required by law, to be used in conjunction with six acres of land donated by Income Property Group for the purpose of building a Veterans Home facility. The 1.J ~I Page 2, Item Meeting Date 02-15-94 4 City Council also added an addendum to the resolution which called for all parties to jointly develop a plan for the proposed Veterans Home facility that contains a major active recreational element for both public and facility use which would complement the Veterans Home project. On May 4, 1993 Council conceptually approved the waiver of certain fees and the funding of an access road associated with the building of a Veterans Home/Recreational Facility in the Lower Sweetwater Valley provided that the site was selected by the State. On September 7, 1993 a request for consideration of a Family Recreation and Fun Center proposal was presented to the Agency by Pacific Malibu Development Corporation/Warner Properties (PMDClWarner). The Agency directed staff to analyze the proposal and return with a report and recommendation. Staff was also directed to begin to evaluate and determine the feasibility of an alternative site for a Veterans Home facility since the Recreation/Fun Center proposal could involve Agency owned land which was previously offered to the State for development of a Veterans Home facility. REPORT ON NEIGHBORHOOD MEETING At the neighborhood meeting, staff provided background and information related to the area and identified previous issues and concerns raised by the residents. This introduction which included details regarding the Veterans Home Proposal was followed by presentations by the Sweetwater Authority which is proposing a water desalination facility, lPG/South Bay LTD which is proposing a 400 unit multi level care Senior Housing project and Pacific Malibu Development CorporationlWarner Properties which is proposing a Family Recreation/Fun Center Sports Complex. Additionally, staff provided a preliminary outline of process milestones and estimated timetable to process a General Plan Amendment/Rezone of the study area if Agency so directs. The following is a list of the major comments and concerns expressed at the meeting: · Most residents at the meeting would prefer that the area remain as open space. . Access to site should be limited only to Second Avenue. . Noise impacts to residents above site expected to increase. · The environmental issues discussed with previous proposals have not gone away (e.g. noise, access, soil condition, biological). . The Family Fun Center proposal is not compatible with surrounding residential uses. . There is a need for parks and recreational facilities in the area. . Need to address visual impacts on property owners on the bluff above site. . Proposals did not address Greenbelt designation of area. · Concern over security problems that the Recreation/Fun Center will create. · Traffic noise, and air quality impacts make the site a poor choice for a Veteran Home. . City should consider repaying Agency housing funds and create a park. 4~,L Page 3, Item Meeting Date 02-15-94 t PROPOSED PROCESS Based on the factors discussed above, staff is proposing the preparation of a draft General Plan Amendment that would layout the proposed land uses for the Lower Sweetwater study area as well as alternatives that should be considered in the preparation of an ErR for this area. Amongst the alternatives considered will be use of the property for a Veterans's Home, Family Fun Center, Senior Housing, and a park for all or portions of the property. The analysis and alternatives to be considered in the EIR would then be presented and discussed at an additional public forum to get neighborhood input and before affected boards and commissions before being presented in a report to the Agency. With direction from the Agency, staff will then proceed with the environmental analysis and subsequent General Plan Amendment and Rezoning hearings. A schedule has been attached which outlines this process (see Exhibit A). FISCAL IMPACT: The initial phase of preparing the draft General Plan Amendment will result in costs which will be borne by the Agency/General Fund. If the Recreation/Fun Center, the Senior Housing Project, the Veterans Home facility or the Sweetwater Authority facility become viable projects, it is expected that the project proponents would participate financially in the processing of the GPA and discretionary approvals, as well as the environmental documents. The process would also include negotiation of financial deal points contained in the applicant's proposal. [AG\B:\LOWERSWE.113] DISK#lA 4-:3 This Jage intentionally left blank. J./,J./ ," -I-. ~, --- ~ \ '~;, '~ ...11." ..'''. . ... ,..... ...... ROUTE '5il r ~....--1j,... ~~.l~~- 2 r-~--l -: -: 1~ ... _:. ~ r--- R3 --. . AREAS WITH SPECIFIC LAND USE PROPOSAL rn. CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT (!) APPLICANT: PROJECT DESCRIPTION: LOWER SWEETWATER ADDRESS: DRAFT GENERAL PLAN SCALE: FILE NUMBER: 1" 5 AMENDMENT NORTH NO SCALE This Jage intentionally left blank. t/~~ Exhibit A LOWER SWEETWATER GPA PLANNING PROCESS ::;i::~;~:~:~:f,::::~:~:::n:~:~~~~:~:~~:~~~:nM~:~*~:~:~~*~f,:::~:::~~*~:~:l~:::l:*::::::~!:~~:*~*:n~:f::n:m:i.m:i:~~:i:m;mmmW;i;~:1;f:~;f:~;f::f,1::::1:m*~:*lm:::*:::*l:*:::*@::::l!:::l::!%:f:~:m:~;!:~;j::f,;f::::::;m:i:l::i:!i::n:n:l!~~l!:::!:::i::i!:f:!:::r:::i:~:i::;i:m;i;m:i:~:f:::!:::::mf:m::,l= MILESTONE MONTHS PHASE I lPrenaration of Draft GPA) 3-5 City Council Direction to Begin GPA Begin Preparation of Analysis Fonnulation of Alternatives Prepare Analysis of Alternatives Selection of Preferred Alternative Public Forum (Discussion of Analysis and Preferred Alternative) Present Draft GPA to City Council PHASE II 1Pr0cessinl! of Draft General Plan Amendment and Rezone) 6-8 Environmental Impact Report (EIR) EIR Kick-off Meeting Draft EIR Issued (45-day Review Begins) Resource Conservation Commission Planning Commission (45-day Review Ends) Final EIR Submitted Planning Commission Public Hearing* City Council Public Hearing** Total 9-13 months Notes: . Public meeting to review project (GPA & Rezone!. ". Certification of E1R and action on GPA & Rezone. 4,7 This yage intentionally left blank. 4-; Minutes December 14, 1993 Page 4 has been prepared with the tenant to govern his tenancy during the remainder of the 12 months. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Continued from the meeting of November 23, 1993) (Community Development Director) B. COUNCIL RESOLUTION 17299 APPROVING THE LEASE OF REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY- OWNED PROPERTY (APN 622~41-20), TO AUGUSTINE REVES AND FINDING THAT CONSIDERATION IS NOT LESS THAN FAm MARKET VALUE C. AGENCY RESOLUTION 1366 APPROVING THE LEASE OF REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY- OWNED PROPERTY (APN 622-041-20) TO AUGUSTINE REVES, FINDING THAT CONSIDERATION IS NOT LESS THAN FAm MARKET VALUE, AND AUTHORIZING CHAIRMAN TO SIGN LEASE Chris Salomone, Director of Community Development, informed the Agency/Council that the lease was not signed by the tenant on the property and requested the item be pulled. Chainnan/Mayor Nader stated the item would be tabled indefinitely. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None ACTION ITEMS IO.A. REPORT STAFF ANALYSIS AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING THE CIillLA VlSfA FAMILY RECREATION AND FUN CENTER PROPOSAL--On 9nt93 a request for consideration of a Family Recreation and Fun Center proposal was presented to the Agency. The Agency directed staff to analyze the proposal and return with a report and recommendation. Staff was also directed to begin to evaluate and determine the'feasibility of an al1emative site for a Veterans Home facility since the Recreation/ Fun Center proposal could involve AgencY-<lwned land which was previously offered to the State for development of a Veterans Home facility. Staff recommends that the Agency accept the report and provide staff further direction. (Community Development Director) B. REPORT PROJECf STATUS ON AN ALTERNATIVE SITE FOR THE VETERANS HOME Chris Salomone, Director of Cominunity Development, clarified that the staff recommendation was that a public forum be held in the neighborhood to assess the neighbors interests and concerns eor not only the Family Fun Center. but the balance of the properties in the lower Sweetwater area and the Veteran's Home proposal. Staff would come back to Council following that forum. Staff would also begin drafting a general plan amendment appropriate for all the land uses in the area. Cbairman Nader questioned if Mr. Salomone was saying that they would start preparing the GPA on those properties that were not the City-owned Sweetwater parcel and would not be involved in the consideration whether it would be a Veteran's Home versus Fun Center, etc. Mr. Salomone responded that they wanted to look at the whole valley as an area, begin the wode, and not wait until the public forum to begin some of the preliminary analysis. Once the public fOlUm was held, staff would come back to the Agency with the results of the folUm. In the mean time, staff was negotiating with the school district On the alternate site for the Veteran's Home with the clear understanding that until that issue was cleared up, the Veteran's ~ f-1 Minutes December 14, 1993 Page 5 Home site was preserved in the lower Sweetwater Valley. It was a matter of expediting the whole process and beginning some of the preliminary work. Chairman Nader questioned if it would be explained clearly at the forum to the residents that the Sweetwater parcel owned by the City was purchased with low/income housing funds and either must be used eor that purpose or the Agency would have to find some way to reimburse that fund. Mr. Salomone responded that was correct. Agency Member Moore questioned iethe Agency owed the Veterans Home Commission some degree of obligation to withhold any change in land use for X months until there was a decision made. Chairman Nader stated it was his understanding the City had made an offer which the Veterans Commission could accept, but they had not done so and until it was accepted the City. could withdraw the ofeer at any time. Agency Member Moore eelt there should be correspondence to the Commission stating the two sites were available and that a decision had to be made by a certain date or the site or sites would be withdrawn. Mr. Salomone stated the decision by the Governor was due to be made in June. The final recommendation from the Commission was due at the end of April or the first oe May and he felt that was a constraint the City needed to deal with. A time period had not been indicated by the City. Chairman Nader stated a resolution had been passed making the site available, but no time frame had been set. Mr. Salomone stated Council acted on a motion that staff had taken to the Veterans Home Committee which was to conceptually approve the donation of the land and to the huilding of the access road. By virtue oe that proposal the City received the number two position in the State. It was subsequent to that action that staff showed them the medical center site. Chairman Nader stated he was not comfortable with starting to process a general plan amendment with as much uncertainty as there was regarding issues such as whether there was another site available, lack of neighborhood input, etc. MSUC (NaderlHorton) 1) to accept the portion oe the staff recommendation that called for a neighborhood forum to be held to coiled input; 2) the Veterans Advisory Task Force as well as any other interested be notified of that forum and be kept abreast of what was being done; and 3) and that at the forum the legal status oe the Sweetwater site, in tenns of its purchase with low/income housing funds, be dearly explained from the outset SO that everyone understood the range of options the City was dealing with. ITEMS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR The minutes will reflect the published agenda order. Items pulled: none. OTHER BUSINESS 11. DIRECTOR/CITY MANAGER'S REPORT None 12. CHAmMAN/MA YOR'S REPORT None 13. AGENCY/COUNCIL MEMBERS' COMMENTS None ~: ;f ,.. It) . ~ . ,-. Minutes December 14, 1993 Page 6 ADJOURNMENT ADJOURNMENT AT 12:05 A.M. to a Regular Meeting of the Redevelopment Agency on Tuesday, January 4, 1994 at 4:00 p.m., immediately follo....;"g the City Council meeting, Council Chambers, Public Services Building. Respectfully submitted, BEVERLY A. AUTIfELET. CMC, City Clerk by: 4-/1 ~ . This Jage intentionally left blank. i-/b REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA STATEMENT Item .54., b,~,.:L Meeting Date 02/15/94 ITEM TITLE: [A] PUBLIC HEARING: RESOLUTION 1372 [B] PUBLIC HEARING: RESOLUTION 1373 [C] PUBLIC HEARING: RESOLUTION 1374 [D] PUBLIC HEARING: TO CONSIDER A REQUEST FROM ENERGY AUTO RECYCLING FOR THE PURPOSE OF ESTABLISHING A BUSINESS FOR THE AUTO STORAGE, WRECKING AND DISMANTLING AT 793-A ENERGY WAY, CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA; PARCEL BEING LOCATED IN THE OTAY VALLEY ROAD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (SUPO- 93-03) Making Certain Findings and Approving Special Permit to Energy Auto Recycling for certain auto wrecking uses at 783-A Energy Way, Chula Vista, California; parcel being located within the Otay Valley Road Redevelopment Project Area TO CONSIDER A REQUEST FROM TOWN AUTO RECYCLING FOR THE PURPOSE OF ESTABLISHING A BUSINESS FOR AUTO STORAGE, WRECKING AND DISMANTLING AT 793-B ENERGY WAY, CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA; PARCEL BEING LOCATED IN THE OTAY VALLEY ROAD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (SUPO-93-04) Making Certain Findings and Approving Special Permit to Town Auto Recycling for certain designated auto wrecking uses at 793-B Energy Way, Chula Vista, California; parcel being located within the Otay Valley Road Redevelopment Project Area TO CONSIDER A REQUEST FROM ALL-Z AUTO RECYCLING FOR THE PURPOSE OF ESTABLISHING A BUSINESS FOR AUTO STORAGE, WRECKING AND DISMANTLING AT 793-C ENERGY WAY, CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA; PARCEL BEING LOCATED IN THE OTAY VALLEY ROAD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (SUPO- 93-05) Making Certain Findings and Approving Special Permit to AII-Z Auto Wrecking for certain designated auto wrecking uses at 793-C Energy Way, Chula Vista, California; parcel being located within the Otay Valley Road Redevelopment Project Area TO CONSIDER A REQUEST FROM JAY JUSTUS FOR THE PURPOSE OF ESTABLISHING A BUSINESS FOR AUTO STORAGE, WRECKING AND DISMANTLING AT 891 ENERGY WAY, CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA; PARCEL BEING LOCATED IN THE OTAY VALLEY ROAD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA (SUPO- 93-06) ,5'-1 Page 2, Item 54.,b, ~IJ. Meeting Date 02/15/94 RESOLUTION 1375 Making Certain Findings and Approving Special Permit to Jay Justus for the purpose of establishing a business for certain designated auto wrecking uses at 891 Energy Way, Chula Vista, Calieornia; parcel being located within the Otay Valley Road Redevelopment Project Area SUBMITTED BY: Community Development Director City Attorney n REVIEWED BY: Executive DirectorJ~ ~~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes _ No X) BACKGROUND: The land uses on the subject parcels were authorized by Conditional Use Permit #PCC-73-27 in 1973 as part of the Otay Industrial Park (See Exhibit I). The Conditional Use Permits expired in 1986. The Otay Valley Road Redevelopment Plan was formed in 1983. Under the Otay Valley Road Redevelopment Plan, the land uses allowed for this area is Limited Industrial/Research. In order to continue the existing land uses, these being the storage, maintenance and repair of heavy equipment, the impounding, storage and dismantling, and wrecking of automobiles, a Special Permit is required under the Redevelopment Plan. RECOMMENDATION: That the Redevelopment Agency hold the public hearings, hear public comments, and adopt the resolutions. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: The Otay Valley Road Project Area Committee held a public hearing on November 8, 1993 recommending approval of SUPO-93-03, 04, 05, and 06 per staff's recommendation. Minutes to the meeting are Attachment "A". DISCUSSION: The proposals for the four lots in question calls for the continuance of the above described land uses all located on Energy Way in the Otay Valley Road Redevelopment Area. The proposals all include the following: 1. Existing landscaping will be improved to City standards as well as the existing irrigation system. 2. New landscaping (planting) will be added, as required. 3. Off-street parking spaces will be provided, as required. 4. Fencing and other appropriate measures to ameliorate adverse visual impacts will be added. The Otay Valley Road Implementation Plan/Design Manual Addendum restricts outdoor storage areas to 20 percent of the building area and requires landscaping of 20 percent of the site. The subject proposals could meet these requirements if the operations were enclosed in an industrial 's-L Page 3, Item Sa.JG.Jd.. . Meeting Date 02/15/94 building. However, this is considered impractical and financially unrealistic by the business operators. The proposed uses would be allowable with a Special Permit allowing deviation from these restrictions. The Agency has been trying to discourage new auto dismantling operations in order to upgrade the area. Presently, there are auto dismantlers only on Energy Way, which is out of view from Otay Valley Road. Because of difficulty in finding new sites in Chula Vista, the City and County of San Diego, it is unlikely that auto dismantlers in the area will leave in the near future. Special Permits were approved last year for Honda Club, Inc., FJ Willert Auto Wrecking, Ecology Auto Wrecking, and A to Z Auto Wrecking, at the eastern end of Energy Way for auto dismantling for a period of 13 years. This year similar approvals were granted for Kit's Auto Recycling, Any Auto Wrecking, South Bay Auto Wreckers, and County Auto Pool which are all located on Energy Way. The Special Permits for Energy Auto Recycling, Town Auto Recycling, All-Z Auto Wrecking, and Jay Justus are conditioned on the following: 1. This Special Land Use Permit is approved for a period of 12 years from the date of approval by the Redevelopment Agency. The permit may be extended by the Zoning Administrator provided a written request for extension is received and approved prior to the expiration of the 12 year approval period. (All of permits so far approved in this area for this land use are scheduled to expire during the year 2006) The Zoning Administrator's decision may be appealed to the Redevelopment Agency. Factors to be reviewed by the Zoning Administrator in considering a request for extension include but are not limited to: I) the degree to which surrounding auto dismantlers have or have not been supplanted by alternate land uses; 2) the economic feasibility of redeveloping the site with alternate land uses; and 3) the quality of site and landscape maintenance. 2. In the event new buildings or exterior alterations to existing buildings are proposed, the applicant shall submit an application to the Planning Department for consideration by the Design Review Committee. The project shall comply with the requirements of the Design Review Committee. 3. Plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval indicating landscape planting/irrigation. fencing, parking and other appropriate screening measures to ameliorate adverse visual impacts. The plans shall be prepared by a Registered Landscape Architect, and shall be implemented within 90 days of the approval of this permit. 4. Applicant shall notify the Planning Department within 24 hours in the event the Fire Department and/or the County Hazardous Materials Division are called to the site due to an occurrence requiring their attention. Based on the nature of the occurrence, the City may schedule the use permit for review and/or revocation. .5-.3 Page 4, Item 54-lb. "do Meeting Date 02/15/94 5. Prior to occupying subject site, applicant shall submit proof that a State Water Resources Control Board approved monitoring program is in effect and being implemented, and that a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is in effect. In the event such proof is not submitted prior to site occupancy, or if the monitoring program lapses, the City may schedule the use permit for review and/or revocation. 6. Applicant shall implement the Precise Plan Guidelines for the Otay Industrial Park as they now exist or may be modified in the future. 7. This special land use permit shall become void and ineffective if not utilized within one year from the effective date thereof, in accordance with Section 19.14.260 of the Municipal Code. Failure to comply with any condition of approval shall cause this permit to be reviewed by the City/Agency for additional conditions or revocation. Side issues to the text amendment to allow auctions in the IP Zone (PCA-93-01) were paving, storm water runoff and environmental monitoring. At present, Planning staff is working on a modification to the Precise Plan Guidelines for the Otay Industrial Park that will address paving, among other issues. Any modification to the precise plan guidelines will be retroactively applicable to the subject application. At present the paving standards are applied to temporary, semi-permanent or permanent uses (see Attachment B). Because of strict self-imposed and State monitoring programs for storm water runoff, the auto wrecking businesses are among the most monitored industries in the State. Staff is satisfied that paving will not be necessary to ensure that storm water does not carry hazardous substances into the City's area of jurisdiction. To ensure that the City is not put at risk of cleaning up spillage from the Energy Way area, two conditions of approval have been added requiring auto wrecking businesses to submit proof within 30 days that they are participating in the State monitoring program. If such proof is not submitted, the applicant faces revocation of the use permit. In addition, if there is a spillage of hazardous/toxic substances on any site along Energy Way that would require a response by the Fire Department and/or the County Hazardous Materials Division, the Planning Department must be notified for review of the circumstances to see if there are ground for modification of the use permit or its revocation. The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposals and determined a Class I exemption from environmental review because they all involve the continuation of the same land uses. The owners and business operators are amenable to the proposed conditions and requirements for a Special Permit. Staff therefore recommends that the Agency approve the Special Permits. $-'1 Page 5, Item 5A,b. tlJ... Meeting Date 02115/94 FISCAL IMPACT: The tax increment accruing from redevelopment of the site will be negligible since this will be a continuation of existing land uses with only site landscaping and parking improvements. A number of jobs will be retained in the City by the continuation of these businesses. Attachments; Exhibit 1 - Site Plan A. Otay Valley Road Project Area Committee Minutes B. Paving Standards for Private Vehicular Areas IC :IWPS1 IAGENCYIRA4SIRECYCLR3.RA4] 5-5 This yage intentionally left blank. 5-6 Cf) ~ 10 0 0 0 ~ I I I Cf) Cf) Cf) <0 0 0 I I I 00 0 A. A. A. " :>> :>> :>> ~ en en en ( ~ ~ 2 . 1 .$~. ~ ('; ~7J~ 0: . W Z W 5~': . I ~- ,. "" . . , . . ~ . ~ " - ;:: ,~ , <. -. ""5, '. ;i , . " ~ ~- ~ ~'-" ... ..~~ , -. ~ Co. T'..,' '" oQ,----- ~ ~._~- ~ J; , . . ~ ~ - oil.. . ;i ~ " . ~; (; , 0: ~: ~ w ..~ ,.,,, ._ . .$Z . ~fO\g'-'''''''' ...... ~ .l~ ~ :"'~O<( ~:~ .... '; <lh - ~ ~ ......... ,....'..... .. ..~ .. ,- ." ......... .~.. E a: : 0 . (;)~ .' ~ I ,., ;,.. . " . ". I . , ...; u @ @.:! ~@~ <I. '.. c. ~ ll. fj" F" ~ i'.sr,r?r A o . . @: to 0 , ~ 8~ . UW' !!! . . " ~ G; I"i.~ '" o . G~ . ,- ;;;'- , . .. . , . . " o l\I .. .. iij ~ r.:-.. ~ '-=ll\l '" .. l\I l\I , . ::;0:'" M ~~ l\I . "'.~c.&r.c SO m 0~ ~ M , ~l ;u 16. a~ "t-"Z . ~... ,...'I"j!'t -:r.i"\ "~I ~~ -:,\:....., ... . . " ~I;;'\ "" ," (\,j ~\W ~ ~.'- ......... -::~ 4:1 ~ _ @'w z. -1-0'--' 4: i . <I; ~ -I >'-..- U 4: ':l ~~'.... ::::- z ......'... '" 0 .t Z : ~ ~ C?I~ . N '" , .5~1 EXHIBIT I o 0: This Jage intentionally left blank. s~J Minutes OTAY VALLEY ROAD PROJECT AREA COMMITTEE Monday, November 8, 1993 9;00 a.m. Conference Rooms 2&3 Public Services Building 1. ROLL CALL PRESENT: Chairman Casillas, Members Hall, Palumbo, McMahon ALSO: Redevelopment Coordinator Kassman; Associate Planner Miller; Jay Justice, business operator; Bill Martinez, consultant; John McCormick, property owner 2. APPROVALOF MINUTES from the meetings of October II, and 25,1993 MSUC (HaIVPalumbo) to approve the minutes as submitted. Staff handed out additional corrections to the minutes that were submitted by Landscape Planner Garry Williams. The Committee made the following changes to the minutes, subject to Mr. Williams' request: . Strike out the last sentence in the third paragraph under item 3, page 1. . Strike out the first two sentences in the fifth paragraph under item 3, page 1. · Paragraph six, under item 3 page 1, strike out the word, "problems" in the first sentence; strike out the second and third sentences. MSUC (HaIVPalumbo) to approye the minutes as revised. 3. Applications for a special Land Use Permit for the continuation of auto storage, recycling and dismantling business Staff gave a brief presentation and handed out a locator map indicating where the business is applying for the special permit for the continuation of auto dismantling activities and related activities were located. Of the four building requests, three were located at 793 Energy Way. These include: SUPO-93-03: 793-A Energy Way, Energy Auto Recycling SUPO-93-04: 793.-B Energy Way, Town Auto Recycling SUPO-93-Q5: 793-C Energy Way, All-Z Auto Wrecking The fourth applicant, (SUPO-93-06) is located at 891 Energy Way. Chairman Casillas asked when the Committee recommends a special permit, when does it go to the Redevelopment Agency? Mr. Miller responded that it will go on December 7. This has already been advertised as a public hearing. Chairman Casillas indicated that the Committee should recommend that there are no objections to continuation of the businesses. Mr. miller indicated that the conditions attached to the permits were basically the same as they were for the 05'-'1 Otay Valley Road PAC, Minutes 2 November 08', 1993 first group of special permits for auto recycling that the committee recommended approval for. The one exception is the addition of a requirement that the permits be recorded in the office of the County Recorder. This will help avoid confusion as to when the permits expire as occurred the last time. Member Hall questioned what the status of the Onager application was. Staff.indicated that it had been approved by the Redevelopment Agency including approval of the right to continue auto repair on site. However, the permits had not been mailed out as yet. MSC (Casillas/Palumbo) to recommend approval of Special Permits to the Redevelopment Agency for permits SUPO-93-03, SUPO-93-04, 05 and 06, as presented by staff (3-1-0, Hall voted no). 4. ORAL COMMENTS a. Mr. McCormick, property owner in the area asked how many more outstanding special permits there were. Staff responded that there were approximately four. Three in the original group of businesses which required removal of special permits and one new application for 791 Energy Way. Chairman Casillas asked what the hold up was for approval of special permits. Mr. Miller responded that staff has not received good site plans for some of the proposals. Some of the site plans submitted did not have enough information on them for review. Staff also indicated that the auto and general auctioning which Mr. McCormick had asked to be included in the zoning text change, had been recommended for approval by the Planning Commission. However, there are still three outstanding issues which will be reviewed later in the day. These include number of parking spaces, paving and sound measurement (however, the latter is no longer an issue). 5. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT - None 6. MEMBERS' COMMENTS a. Member Hall indicated that he would like to have a report on the status of the Onager application for a continuation of his business including auto repair. Mr. Hall indicated that he would also like to see the status of the other original applications for special permit. b. Member Palumbo asked about the status of the Otay Valley Road Widening Project. Staff indicated that negotiations were still underway with the contractor. However, staff had learned that if they redid the project, they would not lose the State grant funding. It is hoped that at the end of this week some determination can be made as to whether staff S -/" Otay Valley Road PAC, Minutes 3 November 08 , 1993 can negotiate a suitable change order with the contractor or whether the project will have to be rebid. c. Member Palumbo, in discussing the reconstruction of the bridge which was washed out in the winter rains of 1993-93, indicated that the reconstruction of the bridge to less than ultimate standards is a testimonial to government bureaucracy. Phase..l of the bridge construction cannot be built to its ultimate width (nor can it be a permanent facility) because of the necessity of using government funds available through FEMA. d. Member McMahon asked what the status of the vacant property at 1815 Nirvana Avenue was. There is a lot of junk strewn on the property and the fence partially down. Staff indicated that they will check into the status and ask code enforcement to inspect the property. 8. STAFF COMMENTS - None Adjournment at 9:40 a.m. to the next regularly scheduled meeting of November 22, 1993, at 9;00 a.m. in Conference Rooms 2&3. fl4 I/~ / [/11!.'~- ;Fred K~man, Recording Secretary [I J.{J8-93.M1N] 5-// This Jage intentionally left blank. 5-/~ PAVEMENT STANDARDS FOR PRIVATE VEHICULAR AREAS Areas upon pri vate property whi ch are requi red to be paved per the vari ous City regulations, or pursuant to conditional approval of the Planning Commission shall be paved in accord with the requirements contained herein and wi th the standard specifi cati ons of the City. Such requirements shall apply to all areas to be paved for the movement, parking or storage of vehicl es except as specifically noted. 1. TEMPORARY USE (maximum of one year). Temporary pavement shall consist of two (2) inches of compacted decomposed granite, the top one inch of which has been treated with SC-250 asphalt road oil to form a water-resistant and dust free wearing surface. Penetrants shall be applied at such rates or a sufficient number of times to produce the specified wearing surface. A weed killer shall be applied in accord with the manufacturers instructions to the entire area to be paved. 2. SEMI-PERMANENT USE (maximum of five years). Semi-permanent pavement shall consist of two inches of asphalt concrete pavement with seal coat placed upon native soil. Asphalt concrete shall be Type "B" per Section 8 of the Standard Specifications except that it shall be permissible to use 40-50 penetration grade asphalt binder as an alternate to 60-70 penetration asphalt binder. A Type "A" seal coat per Subsection 8-08 of the Standard Specifications shall be applied to the entire paved surface. Native soil to receive pavement shall be graded and compacted prior to installation of paving material. A weed killer shall be applied in accord with the manufacturers instructions to the entire prepared native base. 3. PERMANENT USE. Permanent pavement shall consist of a minimum of two inches of asphalt concrete pavement with seal coat, as described under "Semi-Permanent Use" above, applied over a four inch aggregate base (Class 2A) per Section 7 of the Standard Specifications. Native subgrade shall be graded and compacted prior to application of the structural section. Permanent areas for the storage only of passenger type vehicles may be paved as specified under semi-permanent use. This reduction shall apply only to the specific storage areas and does not include areas designated for parking or movement of vehicles. 4. DRIVEWAYS FOR ALL SINGLE-FAMILY, ATTACHED AND DUPLEX RESIDENCES. Driveways for all single-family, single-family attached, and duplex residences shall be paved with a minimum of four inches (4") of concrete of a five sack mix. The Director of Planning may authorize the use of other "permanent pavement", as specified above, when it can be determined that concrete paving would be unnecessary or impractical. Guidelines for such variance would be: S -/.1 ,. a. In an area where asphalt drives are used exclusively or predomi nant1y. b. Where lots are large or unusually deep setbacks prevail, the cost of using concrete may be unreasonable. Driveways with sufficient slope than 12%. (Resolution PCM-72-9, 7/18/72) GENERAL CONDITIONS C. to permit good run-off, but less , In all instances, pavement grades shall be designed and constructed so as to prevent ponding of water upon or adjacent to the paved surface. Pavement shall be maintained in serviceable condition at all times. Patching, seal ing and/or repenetration shall be undertaken as necessary to maintain a usab1 e surface. . Materials and construction methods shall be adequate to accomplish the intended life and purpose of the specified class of pavement. The City Engineer shall have the authority to deny final inspection and utility approval for any property upon which such materials and methods are inadequate. These specifications establish minimum acceptable standards. Higher quality materials as approved by the City Engineer may be substituted in all cases. DESIGN FOR UNUSUAL CIRCm~STANCES Special design efforts are justified in all cases where: 1. Native soil is expansive, poorly drained or has a high clay content. 2. Traffic vol umes are high. 3. Unusually heavy vehicles are expected to utilize the pavement. Relative to the paving of multiple, commercial and/or industrial properties, the City Engineer may require the submission of a pavement design to accommodate any unusual circumstances. Upon approval of the design by the City Engineer, such design shall supersede the blanket requirements contained herei n. WPC 3529P .5 - /'1 RESOLUTION 1372 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS AND APPROVING SPECIAL PERMIT TO ENERGY AUTO RECYCLING FOR CERTAIN DESIGNATED AUTO WRECKING USES AT 793-A ENERGY WAY, CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA; PARCEL BEING LOCATED WITHIN THE OTAY VALLEY ROAD PROJECT AREA WHEREAS, the property which is the subject matter of this Special Permit is commonly known as 793-A Energy Way, Chula Vista, California, (Assessor's Parcel No. 644- 181-16), and, WHEREAS, Energy Auto Recycling ("Applicant") with respect to the special permit herein granted is the owner of the property located at 793-A Energy Way, and, WHEREAS, Applicant had been issued certain conditional use permits in 1973 and said permit expired in 1986; and, WHEREAS, Applicant has requested to continue operating their prospective businesses within the Otay Valley Road Redevelopment Project Area; and WHEREAS, a Special Permit is required for the uses being requested by the Applicant under the Otay Valley Road Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS, the Otay Valley Road Project Area Committee noticed and held a public hearing on November 8, 1993 to consider the use of the following land uses and made the recommendation to the Agency for approval of the Special Permit to Energy Auto Recycling on certain terms and conditions; and. WHEREAS, the Agency noticed and held a public hearing on Tuesday, December 7, 1993, and that all protests, if any, to the approval of a Special Permit in the manner herein contemplated, were made and received at said public hearing, and no convincing objections to the proposed transaction were found to exist. WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator reviewed the proposal and determined a Class 1 exemption from environmental review because of the continuation of same land uses. NOW, THEREFORE, THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA does hereby find, order, detennine and resolve as follows: Section 1. The Agency hereby makes the following findings under the Otay Valley Road Redevelopment Project Area Implementation Plan/Design Manual Addendum: .5'-/5 RESOLUTION 1372 Page 2 a. The proposed project does not constitute a substantial detriment to the Project Area or adjacent areas in that it is compatible with surrounding uses. b. The proposed project generally promotes the orderly physical and economic development of the Project Area in that its continuance contributes to the local economy by providing a needed service. c. The proposed project is generally consistent with the townscape/planning and urban design objectives of the Implementation Plan/Design Manual Addendum, and contributes to the amenity of the Project Area in that the project must implement any requirement related to landscaping, exterior structural alterations, etc. Section 2. The Agency hereby grants Energy Auto Recycling a Special Permit covering the property located at 793-A Energy Way, Chula Vista, California, for the use 1) auto-dismantling and sales of auto parts uses, and (2) scrap metal collection, compaction, cutting, shredding in preparation for the scrap market; and other related uses, for a term of 12 years on the following conditions: I. This Special Land Use Permit is approved for a period of 12 years from the date of approval by the Redevelopment Agency. The permit may be extended by the Zoning Administrator provided a written request for extension is received and approved prior to the expiration of the 12 year approval period. The Zoning Administrator's decision may be appealed to the Redevelopment Agency. Factors to be reviewed by the Zoning Administrator in considering a request for extension include but are not limited to: I) the degree to which surrounding auto dismantlers have or have not been supplanted by alternate land uses; 2) the economic feasibility of redeveloping the site with alternate land uses; and 3) the quality of site and landscape maintenance. 2. In the event new buildings or exterior alterations to existing buildings are proposed, the applicant shall submit an application to the Planning Department for consideration by the Design Review Committee. The project shall comply with the requirements of the Design Review Committee. 3. Plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval indicating landscape planting/irrigation, fencing, parking and other appropriate screening measures to ameliorate adverse visual impacts. The plans shall be prepared by a Registered Landscape Architect, and shall be implemented within 90 days of the approval of this permit. S-/b Presented by: ~ RESOLUTION 1372 Page 3 4. This special land use permit shall become void and ineffective if not utilized within one year form the effective date thereof, in accordance with Section 19.14.260 of the Municipal Code. Failure to comply with any condition of approval shall cause this permit to be reviewed by the City/Agency for additional conditions or revocation. 5. Prior to occupying subject site, or if the site is already occupied by the applicant, within 30 days of the approval of this permit, the applicant shall submit proof that a State Water Resources Control Board approved monitoring program is in effect and being implemented, and that a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is in effect. In the event such proof is not submitted within the specified time period, or if the monitoring program lapses, the City may schedule the use permit for review and/or revocation. 6. Applicant shall implement the Precise Plan Guidelines for the Otay Industrial Park as they now exist or may be modified in the future. 7. This special land use permit shall become void and ineffective if not utilized within one year form the effective date thereof, in accordance with Section 19.14.260 of the Municipal Code. Failure to comply with any condition of approval shall cause this permit to be reviewed by the City/Agency for additional conditions or revocation. A,/P?)d as;.rrm,.., y, r ~y~. ~... Bruce M. Boogaard Agency General Co nsel Chris Salomone, Executive Secretary and Community Development Director IC:I WP51 IAGENCYIRESOSIENERGY .RES] S-/7 This Jage intentionally left blank. S-Itf RESOLUTION 1373 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS AND APPROVING SPECIAL PERMIT TO TOWN AUTO RECYCLING FOR CERTAIN DESIGNATED AUTO WRECKING USES AT 793-B ENERGY WAY, CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA; PARCEL BEING LOCATED WITHIN THE OT A Y VALLEY ROAD PROJECT AREA WHEREAS, the property which is the subject matter of this Special Permit is commonly known as 793-B Energy Way, Chula Vista, California, (Assessor's Parcel Nos. 644- 181-16), and, WHEREAS, Town Auto Recycling ("Applicant") with respect to the special permit herein granted is the owner of the property located at 793-B Energy Way, and, WHEREAS, Applicant had been issued certain conditional use permits in 1973 and said permit expired in 1986; and, WHEREAS, Applicant has requested to continue operating their prospective businesses within the Otay Valley Road Redevelopment Project Area; and WHEREAS, a Special Permit is required for the uses being requested by the Applicant under the Otay Valley Road Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS, the Otay Valley Road Project Area Committee noticed and held a public hearing on November 8, 1993 to consider the use of the following land uses and made the recommendation to the Agency for approval of the Special Permit to Energy Auto Recycling on certain terms and conditions; and, WHEREAS, the Agency noticed and held a public hearing on Tuesday, December 7, 1993, and that all protests, if any, to the approval of a Special Permit in the manner herein contemplated, were made and received at said public hearing, and no convincing objections to the proposed transaction were found to exist. WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator reviewed the proposal and determined a Class I exemption from environmental review because of the continuation of same land uses. NOW, THEREFORE, THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA does hereby fmd, order, detennine and resolve as follows: Section I. The Agency hereby makes the following findings under the Otay Valley Road Redevelopment Project Area Implementation Plan/Design Manual Addendum; 5-rI RESOLUTION 1373 Page 2 a. The proposed project does not constitute a substantial detriment to the Project Area or adjacent areas in that it is compatible with surrounding uses. b. The proposed project generally promotes the orderly physical and economic development of the Project Area in that its continuance contributes to the local economy by providing a needed service. c. The proposed project is generally consistent with the townscape/planning and urban design objectives of the Implementation Plan/Design Manual Addendum, and contributes to the amenity of the Project Area in that the project must implement any requirement related to landscaping, exterior structural alterations, etc. Section 2. The Agency hereby grants Town Auto Recycling a Special Permit covering the property located at 793-B Energy Way, Chula Vista, California, for the use I) auto- dismantling and sales of auto parts uses, and (2) scrap metal collection, compaction, cutting, shredding in preparation for the scrap market; and other related uses, for a term of 12 years on the following conditions: I. This Special Land Use Permit is approved for a period of 12 years from the date of approval by the Redevelopment Agency. The permit may be extended by the Zoning Administrator provided a written request for extension is received and approved prior to the expiration of the 12 year approval period. The Zoning Administrator's decision may be appealed to the Redevelopment Agency. Factors to be reviewed by the Zoning Administrator in considering a request for extension include but are not limited to: 1) the degree to which surrounding auto dismantlers have or have not been supplanted by alternate land uses; 2) the economic feasibility of redeveloping the site with alternate land uses; and 3) the quality of site and landscape maintenance. 2. In the event new buildings or exterior alterations to existing buildings are proposed, the applicant shall submit an application to the Planning Department for consideration by the Design Review Committee. The project shall comply with the requirements of the Design Review Committee. 3. Plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval indicating landscape plantinglirrigation, fencing, parking and other appropriate screening measures to ameliorate adverse visual impacts. The plans shall be prepared by a Registered Landscape Architect, and shall be implemented within 90 days of the approval of this permit. 5-.2. 0 RESOLUTION 1373 Page 3 4. Applicant shall notify the Planning Department within 24 hours in the event the Fire Department and/or the County Hazardous Materials Division are called to the site due to an occurrence requiring their attention. Based on the nature of the occurrence, the City may schedule the use permit for review and/or revocation. 5. Prior to occupying subject site, or if the site is already occupied by the applicant, within 30 days of the approval of this permit, the applicant shall submit proof that a State Water Resources Control Board approved monitoring program is in effect and being implemented, and that a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is in effect. In the event such proof is not submitted within the specified time period, or if the monitoring program lapses, the City may schedule the use permit for review and/or revocation. 6. Applicant shall implement the Precise Plan Guidelines for the Otay Industrial Park as they now exist or may be modified in the future. 7. This special land use permit shall become void and ineffective if not utilized within one year form the effective date thereof, in accordance with Section 19.14.260 of the Municipal Code. Failure to comply with any condition of approval shall cause this permit to be reviewed by the City/Agency for additional conditions or revocation. Presented by: ~J~. ~~ Chris Salomone, Executive Secretary and Community Development Director Bruce M. Boogaard Agency General Counsel [C,IWP51IAGENCYIRESOSITOWNAUTO.RESJ 5-J...1 This Jage intentionally left blank. .s ~.2:L RESOLUTION 1374 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS AND APPROVING SPECIAL PERMIT TO ALL-Z AUTO WRECKING FOR CERTAIN DESIGNATED AUTO WRECKING USES AT 793-C ENERGY WAY, CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA; PARCEL BEING LOCATED WITHIN THE OT A Y VALLEY ROAD PROJECT AREA WHEREAS, the property which is the subject matter of this Special Permit is commonly known as 793-C Energy Way, Chula Vista, California, (Assessor's Parcel Nos. 644- 181-16), and, WHEREAS, All-Z Auto Wrecking ("Applicant") with respect to the special permit herein granted is the owner of the property located at 793-C Energy Way, and, WHEREAS, Applicant had been issued certain conditional use permits in 1973 and said permit expired in 1986; and, WHEREAS, Applicant has requested to continue operating their prospective businesses within the Otay Valley Road Redevelopment Project Area; and WHEREAS, a Special Permit is required for the uses being requested by the Applicant under the Otay Valley Road Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS, the Otay Valley Road Project Area Committee noticed and held a public hearing on November 8, 1993 to consider the use of the following land uses and made the recommendation to the Agency for approval of the Special Permit to All-Z Auto Wrecking on certain terms and conditions; and, WHEREAS, the Agency noticed and held a public hearing on Tuesday, December 7, 1993, and that all protests, if any, to the approval of a Special Permit in the manner herein contemplated, were made and received at said public hearing, and no convincing objections to the proposed transaction were found to exist. WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator reviewed the proposal and determined a Class 1 exemption from environmental review because of the continuation of same land uses. NOW, THEREFORE, THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA does hereby find, order, detennine and resolve as follows: Section 1. The Agency hereby makes the following findings under the Otay 5-.23 RESOLUTION 1374 Page 2 Valley Road Redevelopment Project Area Implementation Plan/Design Manual Addendum: a. The proposed project does not constitute a substantial detriment to the Project Area or adjacent areas in that it is compatible with surrounding uses. b. The proposed project generally promotes the orderly physical and economic development of the Project Area in that its continuance contributes to the local economy by providing a needed service. c. The proposed project is generally consistent with the townscape/planning and urban design objectives of the Implementation Plan/Design Manual Addendum, and contributes to the amenity of the Project Area in that the project must implement any requirement related to landscaping, exterior structural alterations, etc. Section 2. The Agency hereby grants All-Z Auto Wrecking a Special Permit covering the property located at 793-C Energy Way, Chula Vista, California, for the use 1) auto-dismantling and sales of auto parts uses, and (2) scrap metal collection, compaction, cutting, shredding in preparation for the scrap market; and other related uses, for a term of 12 years on the following conditions: 1. This Special Land Use Permit is approved for a period of 12 years from the date of approval by the Redevelopment Agency. The permit may be extended by the Zoning Administrator provided a written request for extension is received and approved prior to the expiration of the 12 year approval period. The Zoning Administrator's decision may be appealed to the Redevelopment Agency. Factors to be reviewed by the Zoning Administrator in considering a request for extension include but are not limited to: I) the degree to which surrounding auto dismantlers have or have not been supplanted by alternate land uses; 2) the economic feasibility of redeveloping the site with alternate land uses; and 3) the quality of site and landscape maintenance. 2. In the event new buildings or exterior alterations to existing buildings are proposed, the applicant shall submit an application to the Planning Department for consideration by the Design Review Committee. The project shall comply with the requirements of the Design Review Committee. 3. Plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval indicating landscape planting/irrigation, fencing, parking and other appropriate screening measures to ameliorate adverse visual impacts. The plans shall be prepared by a Registered Landscape Architect, and shall be implemented 5-21 RESOLUTION 1374 Page 3 within 90 days of the approval of this permit. 4. Applicant shall notify the Planning Department within 24 hours in the event the Fire Department and/or the County Hazardous Materials Division are called to the site due to an occurrence requiring their attention. Based on the nature of the occurrence, the City may schedule the use permit for review and/or revocation. 5. Prior to occupying subject site, or if the site is already occupied by the applicant, within 30 days of the approval of this permit, the applicant shall submit proof that a State Water Resources Control Board approved monitoring program is in effect and being implemented, and that a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is in effect. In the event such proof is not submitted within the specified time period, or if the monitoring program lapses, the City may schedule the use permit for review and/or revocation. 6. Applicant shall implement the Precise Plan Guidelines for the Otay Industrial Park as they now exist or may be modified in the future. 7. This special land use permit shall become void and ineffective if not utilized within one year form the effective date thereof, in accordance with Section 19.14.260 of the Municipal Code. Failure to comply with any condition of approval shall cause this permit to be reviewed by the City/Agency for additional conditions or revocation. Presented by: ;'= d ur ( Bruce M. Boogaard Agency General Counsel ~ COk~ Chris Salomone, Executive Secretary and Community Development Director [C:\ WP51 \AGENCYIRESOS\ALL-Z.RES] S-,J.,5 This yage intentionally left blank. .5 -,zt. RESOLUTION 1375 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS AND APPROVING SPECIAL PERMIT TO JAY JUSTUS FOR CERTAIN DESIGNATED AUTO WRECKING USES AT 891 ENERGY WAY, CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA; PARCEL BEING LOCATED WITHIN THE OTAY VALLEY ROAD PROJECT AREA WHEREAS, the property which is the subject matter of this Special Permit is commonly known as 891 Energy Way, Chula Vista, California, (Assessor's Parcel Nos. 644- 181-14), and, WHEREAS, Jay Justus ("Applicant") with respect to the special permit herein granted is the owner of the property located at 891 Energy Way, and, WHEREAS, Applicant had been issued certain conditional use permits in 1973 and said permit expired in 1986; and, WHEREAS, Applicant has requested to continue operating their prospective businesses within the Otay Valley Road Redevelopment Project Area; and WHEREAS, a Special Permit is required for the uses being requested by the Applicant under the Otay Valley Road Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS, the Otay Valley Road Project Area Committee noticed and held a public hearing on November 8, 1993 to consider the use of the following land uses and made the recommendation to the Agency for approval of the Special Permit to Energy Auto Recycling on certain terms and conditions; and, WHEREAS, the Agency noticed and held a public hearing on Tuesday, December 7, 1993, and that all protests, if any, to the approval of a Special Permit in the manner herein contemplated, were made and received at said public hearing, and no convincing objections to the proposed transaction were found to exist. WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator reviewed the proposal and determined a Class 1 exemption from environmental review because of the continuation of same land uses. NOW, THEREFORE, THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA does hereby fmd, order, detennine and resolve as follows: Section 1. The Agency hereby makes the following findings under the Otay Valley Road Redevelopment Project Area Implementation Plan/Design Manual Addendum: 5-.:1.7 RESOLUTION 1375 Page 2 a. The proposed project does not constitute a substantial detriment to the Project Area or adjacent areas in that it is compatible with surrounding uses. b. The proposed project generally promotes the orderly physical and economic development of the Project Area in that its continuance contributes to the local economy by providing a needed service. c. The proposed project is generally consistent with the townscape/planning and urban design objectives of the Implementation Plan/Design Manual Addendum, and contributes to the amenity of the Project Area in that the project must implement any requirement related to landscaping, exterior structural alterations, etc. Section 2. The Agency hereby grants Jay Justus a Special Permit covering the property located at 891 Energy Way, Chula Vista, California, for the use I) auto-dismantling and sales of auto parts uses, and (2) scrap metal collection, compaction, cutting, shredding in preparation for the scrap market; and other related uses, for a term of 12 years on the following conditions: 1. This Special Land Use Permit is approved for a period of 12 years from the date of approval by the Redevelopment Agency. The permit may be extended by the Zoning Administrator provided a written request for extension is received and approved prior to the expiration of the 12 year approval period. The Zoning Administrator's decision may be appealed to the Redevelopment Agency. Factors to be reviewed by the Zoning Administrator in considering a request for extension include but are not limited to: 1) the degree to which surrounding auto dismantlers have or have not been supplanted by alternate land uses; 2) the economic feasibility of redeveloping the site with alternate land uses; and 3) the quality of site and landscape maintenance. 2. In the event new buildings or exterior alterations to existing buildings are proposed, the applicant shall submit an application to the Planning Department for consideration by the Design Review Committee. The project shall comply with the requirements of the Design Review Committee. 3. Plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval indicating landscape planting/irrigation, fencing, parking and other appropriate screening measures to ameliorate adverse visual impacts. The plans shall be prepared by a Registered Landscape Architect, and shall be implemented within 90 days of the approval of this permit. s -.i.S RESOLUTION 1375 Page 3 4. Applicant shall notify the Planning Department within 24 hours in the event the Fire Department and/or the County Hazardous Materials Division are called to the site due to an occurrence requiring their attention. Based on the nature of the occurrence, the City may schedule the use permit for review and/or revocation. 5. Prior to occupying subject site, or if the site is already occupied by the applicant, within 30 days of the approval of this permit, the applicant shall submit proof that a State Water Resources Control Board approved monitoring program is in effect and being implemented, and that a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is in effect. In the event such proof is not submitted within the specified time period, or if the monitoring program lapses, the City may schedule the use permit for review and/or revocation. 6. Applicant shall implement the Precise Plan Guidelines for the Otay Industrial Park as they now exist or may be modified in the future. 7. This special land use permit shall become void and ineffective if not utilized within one year form the effective date thereof, in accordance with Section 19.14.260 of the Municipal Code. Failure to comply with any condition of approval shall cause this permit to be reviewed by the City/Agency for additional conditions or revocation. Presented by; &-~ ;;z:xr I . Bruce M. Boogaard Agency General Couns o Chris Salomone, Executive Secretary and Community Development Director IC:\ WP51IAGENCYIRESOSIJUSTUS.RES] 5-.2 9 This Jage intentionally left blank. S"-3o c~LUIhET . ~ JM!E[KI~~~. e CD A Division of Calumet Auto Wrecking. Inc. February 8, 1994 To: The Honorable Mayor and Council Members of the City of Chula Vista, California From: Jay E. Justus, Proprietor Calumet Auto Wrecking 891 Energy Way Chula Vista, CA 91911 Please accept this notice as my affirmation that the conditions set forth in the Redevelopment Agency Agenda Statement, prepared for the Public Hearing, Februaryl5,1994 (See Item D), meet with my approval. I am unable to attend the February 15, 1994 Council Meeting due to a prior commitment out of state, and respectfully request your pardon from the proceedings. I may be contacted by your staff upon my return, on February 21, 1994, should the need arise. 891 Energv Way 0 Chula V1sta. CA 919110 (619) 26t>-0501 1 (619) 421-1350 1 FAX (619) 421-9825/1-800-443-6092