Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutRDA Packet 1995/02/07 Tuesday, February 7, 1995 Council Chambers 4:00 p.m. Public Services Building Ommediately following the City Council meeting) Regular Meeting of the Redevelonment Agency of the City of Chula Vista CALL TO ORDER 1. ROLL CALL: Members Fox -' Moot -' Padilla -, Rindone -, and Chairman Horton - 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: January 24, 1995 CONSENT CALENDAR None Submitted. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES The following ilems have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. If you wish to speak to any ilem, please fill out the "Request to Speak Form" available in the lobby and submiJ il to the Secretary of the Redevelopment Agency or the City Clerk prior to the meeting. (Complete the green form to speak in favor of the staff recommendation; complete the pinkform to speak in opposition to the staff recommendation.) Comments are limiled to five minutes per individual. 3. PUBLIC HEARING EXTENSION OF LEASE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 818 BROADWAY TO SOUTH BAY CHEVROLET COMPANY, INC., AND MR. EDUARDO MARTORELL, WITHOUT PUBLIC BIDDING PURSUANT TO SECTION 33431 OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT LAW --The Agency acquired the leasehold interest in the property as part of the acquisition of the dealership's properties for the Auto Park project. South Bay Chevrolet has decided to continue to sell used cars at the site and requests reconveyance of the lease and leasehold interests. Continued from the meeting ofJanuarv 17. 1995. Staff reœmmends continuin!! this item to a date and time certain. that bein!! Tuesday. Febmarv 21. 1995 at 6:00 V.m.. immediately followin!! the City Council meetin!!. (Community Development Director) RESOLUTION 1445 AUTHORIZING THE EXTENSION OF LEASE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 818 BROADWAY TO SOUTH BAY CHEVROLET COMPANY, INC., AND MR. EDUARDO MARTORELL, AND AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN TO EXECUTE SAME "\ declare under renelty cf perjury that I am ~~~:;~~~~Z~~;:~~;';~'~:.~.è~'>,'i::,~:~:~~":~el post U~'~~'j7~1;5'~~~:'::q2'.;i r~~ ~ -. Agenda -2- February 7, 1995 ORAL COMMUNlCA TIONS This is an opportunity for the general public to address the Redevelopment Agency on any subject matter wilhin the Agency's jurisdiction that is not an ilem on this agenda. (State law, however, generally prohibils the Redevelopment Agency from taking action on any issues not included on the posted agenda.) If you wish to address the Council on such a subject, please complete the yellow "Request lo Speak Under Oral Communications Form" available in the lobby and submit it to the Secretary to the Redevelopment Agency or City Cterk prior to the meeting. Those who wish to speak, please give your name and address for record purposes and follow up action. Your time is limiled to three minutes per speaker. ACTION ITEMS The ilems listed in this section of the ågenda are expected to elicil substantial discussions and deliberations by the Agency, staff, or members of the general public. The ilems will be considered individually by the Agency and staff recommendations may in certain cases be presented in the alternative. Those who wish to speak, please fill out a "Request to Speak" form available in the lobby and submil il to the Secretary to the Redevelopment Agency or the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Public comments are limiled to five minutes. 4. REPORT APPEAL OF DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE REQUIREMENTS FOR SOUTH BAY CHEVROLET--The auto dealer wishes to appeal the need to install certain paving improvements as approved by the Design Review Committee. It is recommended that the Agency Board approve the report subject to conditions as outlined by staff. Continued from the meeting of Januarv 24 1995. (Community Development DirectorlDirector of Planning) OTHER BUSINESS 5. DIRECTOR'S REPORTfS) 6. CHAIRMAN'S REPORTtS) 7. MEMBER COMMENTS ADJOURNMENT The meeting will adjourn to a Special Redevelopment Agency Meeting on February 14, 1995 at 6:00 p.m., immediately following the City Council meeting, in the City Council Chambers. ****** COMPLIANCE WITH THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT The City of Chula Vista, in complying with the Americans With Disabilities Act (ADA), request individuals who require special accommodations to access, attend, and/or participate in a City meeting, activity, or service request such accommodation at least forty-eÏght hours in advance for meetings and five days for scheduled services and activities. Please contact the Secretary to the Redevelopment Agency for specific infonnationat 619.691.5047 or Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf (TDD) at 619.585.5647. California Relay Service is also available for the hearing impaired. [c: I WP51 IAGENCYIAGENDASI02-{}7 -95. AGD I -- -. MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETiNG OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA Tuesday, January 24, 1995 Council Chambers 9:45 p.m. Public Services Building CALL TO ORDER 1. ROLL CALL: PRESENT: Members Fox, Moot, Rindone, and Chair Horton ABSENT: Member Padilla (excused) ALSO PRESENT: John D. Goss, Director; Bruce M. Boogaard, Agency Attorney, and Vicki C. Soderquist, Deputy City Clerk 2. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: January 17, 1995 MSC (MootlHorton) to approve the minutes of January 17, 1995 as presented. Approved 4-0-1 with Padilla absent. BUSINESS 3. REPORT APPEAL OF DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE REQUIREMENTS FOR SOUTH BAY CHEVROLET - The auto dealer wishes to appeal the need to install certain paving improvement as approved by the Design Review Committee. Staff recommends the Agency continue the item to the February 7, 1995 meeting in order to allow staff additional time for negotiations. (Community Development Director) MSC (Horton/Fox) to continue the report to the meeting of 2/7/95. Approved 4-0-1 with Padilla absent. 4. REPORT FISCAL YEAR 1995-95 MID-YEAR AGENCY BUDGET REVIEW - At the time the Agency approved the FY 1994-95 budget, Members requested a mid-year report be compiled for Agency review and discussion. Staff recommends the Agency continue the item to the meeting of February 7, 1995. (Community Development Director) Member Rindone questioned if the Agency could anticipate receiving the mid-year report at the 217/95 meeting. Mr. Goss replied that it would have been on the agenda but he did not feel it was adequately prepared. He anticipated that it would be ready for the 217/95 meeting if the revisions were done properly. Member Rindone questioned if an additional week would be beneficial to staff. Mr. Goss stated the 117/95 meeting was lengthy and in order to fully discuss it the Agency may want to contioue it to the 2/14/95 meeting. MSC (RindonelHorton) to call a special Agency meeting on 2/14/95 focusing only on the budget item. Approved 4-0-1 with Padilla absent. 02-/ -. Minutes January 24, 1995 Page 2 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS None OTHER BUSINESS 5. DIRECTOR'S REPORT(s) - None 6. CHAIRMAN'S REPORT(s) - None 7. MEMBER COMMENTS - None CLOSED SESSION The Agency met in closed session at 9:50 p.m. and reconvened at 10:21 p.m. 8. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING: 1. Existing litigation pursuant to Govemmeot Code Section 54956.9 . Wally Bozek; Henry Gonzales v. Redevelopment Ageocy of the City of Cbula Vista and Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. regarding cballenge to Redeyelopment Agency's providing subsidy to Wal-Mart Project; alleged violation of AB 1290 9. REPORT OF ACTIONS TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION - No reportable actions were taken. ADIOURNMENT ADJOURNMENT AT 10:22 P.M. to the Regular Redeyelopment Agency Meeting on February 7, 1995 at 4:00 p.m., immediately following the City Council meeting, in the City Council Chambers. Respectfully submitted, BEVERLY A. AUTHELET, CMC, City Clerk by: 02-¿ --. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA STATEMENT Item Meeting Date 02/07/95 ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: EXTENSION OF LEASE FOR PROPERTY LOCATED AT 818 BROADWAY TO SOUTH BAY CHEVROLET CO., INC., AND MR. EDUARDO MARTORELL WITHOUT PUBLIC BIDDING PURSUANT TO SECTION 33431 OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT LAW RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends this item be continued to a date and time certain, that being Tuesday, February 21,1995 at 6:00 p.m., immediately following the City Council meeting. 3 -I . - -- ~ þafj~ Clank! 3-;2... - - -. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA STATEMENT 'temL Meeting Date 02/07/95 ITEM TITLE: Appeal of Design Review Committee Requirements for South Bay Chevrolet SUBMITTED BY: Community Developmrirector {~ ' Planning Director ~ ~ REVIEWED BY: Executive Directo~C4 ~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes - No 10 BACKGROUND: South Bay Chevrolet opened at thei e:-:uto Park location in mid-October. At that time, certain paving improvements as approved by the Design Review Committee and the Agency were not installed. Consequently, South Bay received a temporary (90 day) Certificate of Occupancy and posted a $10,000 letter of credit to guarantee that the improvements would be completed. However, the dealer now wishes to appeal the need to install the improvements to the Agency. The appeal was considered by the Agency on January 17, 1995 and continued for further discussion to tonight's meeting. RECOMMENDATION: That the Agency hear the appeal from South Bay Chevrolet and support the recommendation of the Design Review Committee. Should the Agency wish to consider alternatives, two additional recommendations are provided pursuant to the direction of the Agency at the meeting of January 17, 1995, to consider punitive measures to be applied for deviating from DRC approved plans. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: A special meeting of the Design Review Committee was called on October 3, 1994 to review and consider plan deviations requested by South Bay Chevrolet. At that meeting, the DRC approved the following deviations: 1. Auto display pads may remain as installed; Le., grey concrete with rock salt finish and uniform scoring, rather than previously approved multi-color concrete with swirl pattern and geometric scoring; 2. Southerly perimeter wall may remain as installed; i.e., enhanced split-faced block facing to the interior of the dealership rather than south toward Otay Valley Regional Park as previously approved, provided the southerly surface is painted to match the building and adequate landscaping is provided to screen the wall and satisfy pertinent EIR requirements; 3. The vast majority of the paving fronting the showroom may remain as installed; Le., rock salt with scoring rather than exposed aggregate with scoring as previously approved, except for the pedestrian entry areas which shall be defined with enhanced paving subject to review and approval of staff; 4. The driveway entrance shall be enhanced with colored Bomanite per the approved plans, rather than the scored rock salt finish which has been installed. DISCUSSION: Pursuant to the request for a Certificate of Occupancy for South Bay Chevrolet, a final inspection of improvements was made by Planning staff. It was determined that there were several -'-1-/ ..- Page 2, Item 1... Meeting Date 02/07/95 deviations from the approved ORC and building plans which had not been reviewed or approved. Those deviations included failure to landscape slopes, treatment of the perimeter wall adjacent to Otay River Valley and hardscape improvements at driveway and building entrances and on display pads. The wall will be painted by the owners. The City has received funds from the surety company which bonded the original site grading work which included but never completed the slope landscaping. These funds will allow the City to have this work completed shortly under a separate contract. The Bomanite at the driveway entry and the enhanced hardscape pedestrian entrances have not been installed. In order to open on time, South Bay Chevrolet provided a $10,000 letter of credit to receive a 90 day temporary Certificate of Occupancy which expired in mid-January. They were to have completed the improvements by that time. They have chosen, instead, to protest the need for the Bomanite and enhanced pedestrian entrance to the Agency and to request a permanent Certificate of Occupancy and return of their Letter of Credit. The owners do not see the need or value in the proposed hardscape improvements which are estimated to cost approximately $3,750 (excluding removal of existing pavement), and claim that construction will disrupt business at the dealership. The owners have installed saw cut, salt finish concrete at the driveway and pedestrian entrances to the dealership. This treatment does not provide the color accent and texture recommended by the ORC for these areas, but is considered an enhancement over standard concrete. Installation of Bomanite would require removal of approximately 750 square feet of the concrete treatment which would add cost and temporarily disrupt operations. This action was recommended as a compromise by the ORC and is supported by staff. If the Agency wishes to consider alternatives to the ORC recommendation, two additional recommendations are provided below. To not require either further improvement of the property or a "punitive" payment is not recommended by staff since it would effectively reward the owners for ignoring the City's planning and design review process, and perhaps encourage others to do so. Therefore, the Agency could consider the following as alternatives to the installation of Bomanite: Alternative 1: Pavment for Public Improvements The full value of the Bomanite treatment, excluding pavement removal, is $3,750. The differential cost savings by installing saw cut, salt finish concrete instead of Bomanite has been estimated by the City's Landscape Architect at $.75/square foot, or a total of $562.50 for the 750 square foot of pavement recommended for treatment. Therefore, the owners could be required to pay the incremental value of $562.50 up to the full value of $3,750 into a fund which could be earmarked for improvements to the future trail head at the end of Bfandywine Avenue or other alternative public improvements in the immediate area. Alternative 2: Alternate Private Improvements The Agency could alternatively require the property owner to invest from $562.50 to $3,750 in alternative on-site improvements. One area requiring improvement is the southwest corner of the dealership property which was originally to serve as an easement for construction of a service road traversing the slope to the proposed regional park below. The service road has been installed and did not require use of the easement area which comprises approximately 700 square feet and is only marginally landscaped. The cost of full landscaping and irrigation of this 'f-oÛ - -- Page 3, Item L Meeting Date 02/07/95 area is estimated at $500-$600. FISCAL IMPACT: The dealer has indicated that the southerly perimeter wall will be painted. The hardscape improvements recommended by the ORC, including the removal of existing concrete, have been estimated to cost $5,000. The Agency could require from $562.50 (incremental value) to $3,750 (full value) to be placed in a fund for public improvements, or to be invested in alternative on-site improvements. [m:'oharedlplanning'obchev.ca4) 4-3 - CJhi~ þatJE- Clank! .tj-1 ~~f?. ~=~~ ellY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT October 5, 1994 ! Dave OrdwaylTravis Reneau 580 Auto Park Drive Chula Vista, CA 91911 SUBJECT: DRC-93-23; (SOUTH BAY CHEVROLET) I Dear Mr. Ordway and Mr. Reneau: The Design Review Committee, at their October 3, 1994 special meeting, considered the proposed amendments to the previously approved development plans for parcel #4 of the Chula Vista Auto Center site. The Committee approved the design modifications for the South Bay Chevrolet project subject to the following conditions: 1. :Bomanite shall be installed at the main driveway entrance to the South Bay Chevrolet site. 2. The pedestrian access areas alljacent to the showroom shall be defined by an enhanced har~cape treatment. Specific design solutions shall be submItted to staff for review and approval. 3. The southerly perimeter wall. shall be painted and adequate planting materials shall be provided on the slope alljacent to it to screen said waIl to satisfy pertinent Em requirements. Failure to use the subject development permit within one year from the date of this letter sllall cause the permit to become null and avoid unless a writtçn request for an expansion Is received and granted prior to the expiration date. . H you have further questions, please contact me at 476-5331. ;¡;~~ Am oIre Acting Associate Planner cc: George Avanesian, 4OO,Oyster Point Blvd. #207, South San Francisco, CA 94080 Fred Kassman, Redevelopment Coordinator '-1-5 - .'\jaoœIdn>93-23 276 FOURTH AVE/CHULA VtSTA. CALIFORNIA 91910/(619) 691-5101 .-. -- C1Id~ þ~g {;lank! 1-¿ I ~ ¿. 'I I /' \ Y'\, /'\ /fi} ".'/ / a. ::J u ~ /.......--g .- --, ' . J~ ': \' '. - ~ . .: . ~.. -.:J"" ,r- . '9 - '" " '~.(,~ ~!.î. ~.ò .' î~:--' . ~:-. ~~ç" . . 1') ;,¡ '. -' \. \j "'!i ~~ '< \ ':J.j ~ 4,.} \ 'c>'--~~~' ~ . \(f'-{¡} '" Ò. . . t . -..' ;'3-' . . . t\~ Ò ~ : . +' i'lAe. ~ . 0? . '. ~. cI!' .'fÞ ':-, ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ , .J <r (t. . ': w r--' (! .' ;/-7 , . .' ".". I ' \ -. (i>f -=--=- ":::- <1:' ~~ FJ~ Clank! ~~¡ :,/ 2. DRC-93-23 South Bav Chevrolet f(., q¥ DRC-94-01 Fuller Ford/Honda Auto Park Drive 11' Site & Architectural Design Modifications.~ q, Staff Presentation Assistant Planner Amy Wolfe presented the two projects together. She reminded members that the South Bay Chevrolet and Fuller Ford/Honda auto dealerships had been previously considered and conditionally approved by the committee. Ms. Wolfe advised members that both sites are currently under construction, and both projects have filed applications requesting approval df site and architectural design modifications, including the paving/hardscape design and the southerly concrete wall design. Modification of the building concrete block wall fmish for the Fuller Ford/Honda site was also requested. Ms. Wolfe indicated that the requested paving modification bas already been implemented at the South Bay Chevrolet site, and that the southerly boundary concrete wall design and orientation m!XIifications requested have also been implemented; these were done without City approvals. Aoolicant Discussion Mr. George Avenessian, project architect for both sites, stated that money had not been an issue in implementing the project changes; the owner had simply decided that some of the design elements we're not practical. With respect to paving, Mr. Avenessian stated that the majority of the hardscape pads would be covered with cars, and that the textured and scored paving would at best look like patchin.g to a customer walking among the cars. Mr. Avenessian acknowledged that the bomonite at the entry would have been a visual improvement over the rock salt fmish, but added that the Owners did not intend to remove and re-do the hardscape. Chair Spethman stated that the hardscape had been a part of the fulf11lment of landscaping requirements, and asked what would be done to replace it. Mr. A venessian stated that he did not have the authority to agree to any changes, and indicated that the owners would appeal to the Redevelopment Agency if an acceptable solution was not arrived at here. In response to the issue of the wall, Mr. Avenessian stated that it did not make sense to orient the decorative ponions of the wall towards the open space where it would not be seen. He added that - 4~ 9 - - . the Environmental Impact Report had required the wall for sound rather than design. Principal Planner Steve Griffm reviewed the pertinent section of the EIR. acknowledging that the wording regarding wall design was somewhat subjective. , Committee Discussion Chair Spethman stated that the owner has chosen to ignore the Design Review Committee and its recommendations. Member Rodriguez asked what has been done design-wise to make up for the lost enhancements? He pointed out that thé entrance paving would not have been covered with cars. Project Manager Tony Collura stated that the rock salt fmish utilized at the entry would be easier to maintain than the approved bomonite. Ms. Wolfe noted that when the auto park was planned, the intent of the auto diSplay pads was to showcase cars but not necessarily to pack the pad areas with vehicles. She added that the hardscape originally approved had fulfilled landscaping requirements. She indicated that staff had suggested that the applicants provide alternate solutions to the modifications requested. Members asked about alternatives; Mr. Collura stated that an overlay 'for the entry paving would not work due to the traffic, and that Bomonite would also have stained and deteriorated. He added that the only solution he could see would be to blast the paving for texture and seal it. Member Way stated that the entrances needed to be enhanced, although he could see possibly backing off of the auto display areas. Chair Spethman stated that the entrance paving could be saweut, and bomoniteintroduced. Mr. Collura stated that the steel in. the . slab is elose to the surface; if it was. sawcut, the steel might be broken. He added that exposed aggregate could not have been used at the showroom entries due to wheelchair access requirements. Regarding the building block walls, he pointed out that they have already been graffitied and if the split face had faced outward, it would have to have been sandblasted. All members agreed that the entry driveways and showroom entries needed to be Ç.nhanced; various methods were discussed. Mr. Avenessian indicated that he could discuss the alternatives with the owners, but had no authority to approve them himself. Members stated that they wished to visit the site before making a fmal determination. Mr. Griffm explained that the owners were working within a tight timeframe. It was decided that members would visit the site in pairs, with a special meeting to be held for fmal consideration of the proposed modificati,ons. MSUC (Spethman!Way) (4-0) to continue both items to a special meeting on October 3, 1994 at 4:30 so that committee members may inspect the site. " -1-) ~ /ó ._._d- -.. .-- /. MINUTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING OF THE . DESIGN REVIEW COMMfITEE Mondav October 3. 1994 Conference Rooms 2 and 3 4:30 p.m A. ROLL CALL ! MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Spethman, Vice Chair Rodriguez, Member Way MEMBERS ABSENT: Member Duncanson and Kelly, with noûficaûon STAFF PRESENT: Principal Planner Steve Griffin . Acrlng Associate Planner Amy. Wolfe Redevelopment Coordinator Fre4 Kassman B. INTRODUCTORY REMARKS Chair Spethman made an opening statement explaining the design review process and the committee's responsibilities. He asked that all speakers sign in and identify themselves verbally for the record when speaking. C. PRESENTATION OF PROJECTS DRC~3-23. South BavChevrolet Discussion" Chair Spethman stated that all Design Review Committee members present had visited the South Bay Chevrolet and the Fuller FordlHonda site. He indicated that in his opinion a) bomanite should be installed at the main driveway entraDce to the South Bay Chevrolet site, b) the pedestrian access areas adjacent to the showroom. cntraDce area should be defined by using a saw-cut pattern and ûle pavers, c) the southerly perimeter wall should be painted and screened with landscaping materials. Project manager Tony Collura stated that the suggested design treatment for' the pedestrian access areas is not possible because saw-cutting the slab would affect its $trUCtU1'al integrity, and addiûona1landscapingcould not be provided and m~;nt~inM adjacent to the perimeter wall due to water consumption limitations. Redevelopment Coordinator Fre4 Kassman indicated that a water meter is in place for the irrigation of landscaping materials planted on the slope adjacent to the southerly property line of the project and that would. address any concerns expressed by the applicant in teImS of irrigation. ~-/I _. - _.- ! Member Rodriguez concurred with the Chair in that the pedestrian access areas adjacent to the showroom should be enhanced with a decorative hardscape treatment. Mr. Collura asked if the Committee could simply approve or deny the project proposal} as constructed. Principal Planner Steve Griffm indicated that the Committee tries to resolve design issues by providing some general direction and design suggestions which may be considered and/or refmed by the project architect. Member Way stated that he agreed with the Chair's recommendations. MSUC (SpethmanlWay) (3-0) to approve the proposéd amendments to DRC 93-23 subject to the following conditions; 1. Bomanite shall be installed at the main driveway entrance 'to the South Bay Chevrolet site. 2. The pedestrian access areas adjacent to the showroom shall be defmed by an enhanced hardscape treatment. Specific design solutions shall be submitted to . staff for review and approval. 3. . The southerly perimeter wall shall be painted and adequate planting materials shall' be provided on the slope adjacent to it to screen said wall and satisfy pertinent EIR requirements. "/+-/~ . ,_. -, NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista, California hereby gives notice, pursuant to Sections 33431 of the California Health and Safety Code that a public hearing will be held by the. Redevelopment Agency to consider the assignment of a lease and leasehold interest in the property located at 818 Broadway, Chula Vista, to South Bay Chevrolet, Co., Inc. The leasehold interest was acquired by the Redevelopment Agency as part of the acquisition of the South Bay Chevrolet dealership properties located at 801 Broadway. South Bay Chevrolet, Co., Inc. currently subleases this property from the Redevelopment Agency for the purpose of operating a used car sales business on the site. South Bay Chevrolet, Co., Inc., has requested an assignment of the lease and leasehold interest in order to continue to operate the business at this location. The assignment of lease and leasehold interest will occur without competitive bidding since this will be for the continuation of an exi¿ting business on the site. The current lease is considered to be at market value and thefe is, consequently, no bonus value or other consideration ascribed to the assignment. The current lease expires on June 30, 1997 with an option to renew for five years. The Redevelopment Agency does not anticipate that there will be any redevelopment on this site in the .near futufe. The PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD ON Tuesday, January 17, 1995 beginning at 6:00 p.m. following the City Council Meeting and will be lo'cated in Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, at which time any interested person may appear. Any questions regarding the proposed assignment of lease and leasehold interest may be direc~ed to the Department of Community Development, City of Chula Vista, 276 Fourth AvenUe, Chula Vista, CA 91910 (619) 691-5047. - , Any person wishing to comment on this matter may do so at the Public Hearing or in written correspondence to the Secretary to the Redevelopment Agency, c/o Department of Community Development at the address above prior to the Public Hearing. Dated December 22, 1.994 Chris Salomone Community Development Director -.