The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRDA Packet 1998/08/04 Tuesday, August 4, 1998 Council Chambers 4:00 p.m. Public Services Building (immediately following the City Council meeting) Joint Meeting of the Redevelopment Agencv /Citv Council of the City of Chula Vista CALL TO ORDER 1. ROLL CALL: Agency/Council Members Moot -' Padilla -' Rindone -' Salas -' and Chair/Mayor Horton- CONSENT CALENDAR (Item 2) (Will be voted on immediately following the Council Consent Calendar during the City Council meeting) The staff recommendations regarding the following item listed under the Consent Calendar will be enacted by the Agency by one motion without discussion unless an Agency member, a member of the public or City staff requests that the item be pulled for discussion. If you wish to speak on one of these items, please fill out a "Request to Speak Form" available in the lobby and submit it to the Secretary of the Redevelopment Agency or the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be discussed after Action Items. Items pulled by the public will be the first items of business. 2. RESOLUTION 1594: APPROVING OWNER/TENANT PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT WITH MR. JOHN C. MaBEE AND CSK AUTO, INC, FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A COMMERCIAL BUILDING AT 1396 THIRD AVENUE LOCATED WITHIN THE SOUTHWEST REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA--CSK Auto, Inc., doing business as Kragen Auto Parts, is proposing to construct a 7,000 sq. ft. commercial building at 1396 Third Avenue within the boundaries of the Southwest Redevelopment Project Area. The building will be used as an auto parts and accessories store. The project includes the removal of an existing building and the construction of a trash enclosure and landscape areas. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Community Development Director) . . . END OF CONSENT CALENDAR' . . ACTION ITEMS The items listed in this section of the agenda are expected to elicit substantial discussions and deliberations by the Agency, staff, or members of the general public. The items will be considered individually by the Agency and staffrecommendations may in certain cases be presented in the alternative. Those who wish to speak, please fill out a "Request to Speak" form available in the lobby and submit it to the Secretary to the Redevelopment Agency or the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Agenda -2- August 4, 1998 3. COUNCIL APPROVING THE DOWNTOWN HOLIDAY LIGHTING PROGRAM RESOLUTION 19120 CONCEPT AND DIRECTING STAFF TO DEVELOP A DETAILED AGENCY PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN AND AN AMENDMENT TO THE RESOLUTION 1595 TOWN CENTRE I FINE ARTS POLICY TO INCLUDE THE DOWNTOWN HOLIDAY LIGHTING PROGRAM--Due to the discontinuation of holiday lights and displays on Candy Cane Lane, Council directed staff to look at other possibilities to continue the holiday lighting tradition on Third Ayenue in the Downtown area. A task force was formed and a holiday lighting program was approved by consensus of the task force. Staff recommends approval of the resolutions. (Community Development Director) ITEMS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR This is the time the Redevelopment Agency will discuss items which have been removed from the Consent Calendar, Agenda items pulled at the request of the public will be considered prior to those pulled by Agency Members. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS This is an opportunity for the general public to address the Redevelopment Agency on any subject matter within the Agency's jurisdiction that is not an item on this agenda. (State law, however, generally prohibits the Redevelopment Agency from taking action on any issues not included on the posted agenda.) If you wish to address the Agency on such a subject, please complete the "Request to Speak Under Oral Communications Form" available in the lobby and submit it to the Secretary to the Redevelopment Agency or City Clerk prior to the meeting, Those who wish to speak, please give your name and address for record purposes andfollow up action, OTHER BUSINESS 4. DIRECTOR/CITY MANAGER'S REPORT(S) 5. CHAIRIMAYOR'S REPORTfS) 6. AGENCY/COUNCIL MEMBER COMMENTS ADJOURNMENT The meeting will adjouru to a closed session and thence to the Regular Redevelopment Agency Meeting on September I, 1998 at 4:00 p.m., immediately following the City Council meeting, in the City Council Chambers. ********** Agenda -3- August 4, 1998 CLOSED SESSION Unless Agency Counsel, the Executive Director, or the Redevelopment Agency states otherwise at this time, the Agency will discuss and deliberate on the following item(s) of business which are permitted by law to be the subject of a closed session discussion, and which the Agency is advised should be discussed in closed session to best protect the interests of the City, The Agency is required by law to return to open session, issue any reports of.!'i!l9J. action taken in closed session, and the votes taken. However, due to the typical length of time taken up by closed sessions, the videotaping will be terminated at this point in order to save costs so that the Agency's return from closed session, reports of.ti!l!!1 action taken, and adjournment will not be videotaped. Nevertheless, the report of final action taken will be recorded in the minutes which will be available in the Office of the Secretary to the Redevelopment Agency and the City Clerk's Office. 7. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING ANTICIPATED LITIGATION - Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956,9(c), Initiation of Litigation One case. 8. CONFERENCE WITH REAL PROPERTY NEGOTIATOR - Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956,8 Property: 340-368 Bay Boulevard (5 parcels totaling 3.65 acres): 567-022-35 340 Bay Boulevard 1.02 acres 567-022-17 350 Bay Boulevard 0.65 acres 567-022-31 360 Bay Boulevard 0.73 acres 567-022-33 364 Bay Boulevard 0.63 acres 567-022-28 368 Bay Boulevard 0.62 acres Negotiating Parties: Redevelopment Agency (Chris Salomone); San Diego Unified Port District; B.F. Goodrich Under Negotiations: Purchase/lease terms and conditions -.- - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA STATEMENT Item ~ Meeting Date DBID4/9B ITEM TITLE: RESOLUTION /$94 APPROVING OWNER/TENANT PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT WITH MR. JOHN C. MaBEE AND CSK AUTO, INC. FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A COMMERCIAL BUILDING AT 1396 THIRD AVENUE LOCATED WITHIN THE SOUTHWEST REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA SUBMITTED BY: Community Development Director (~ I REVIEWED BY: Ee,.;e D;'~t"DIz tc) ~ (4/Sths Vote: Yes- NoL) BACKGROUND: CSK Auto, Inc., doing business as Kragen Auto Parts, is proposing to construct a 7,000 sq. ft. commercial building at 1396 Third Avenue within the boundaries of the Southwest Redevelopment Project Area, Mr. John C, MaBee has a long-term ground lease on the property and will lease part of the parcel to CSK Auto, Inc. for the construction of the building, The building will be used as an auto parts and accessories store. The project includes the removal of an existing building which was last used as the Adobe Rose Restaurant. and which has been vacant for at least two years. The project also includes the construction of a trash enclosure and landscape areas. The proposed land use is allowed under the General Plan, Montgomery Specific Plan, Southwest Redevelopment Plan and Zoning Ordinance. The City's Environmental Review Coordinator reviewed the project and determined that it is Class 1(e)(2) Categorical Exception pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. Since the project is within the Southwest Redevelopment Project Area, the Owner/Tenant Participation Agreement (which includes the design plans and conditions of approval) is being presented to the Redevelopment Agency for its consideration, RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency adopt the resolution approving the Owner/Tenant Participation Agreement for the development of a commercial building at 1396 Third Avenue subject to the conditions in Exhibit B of the agreement. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: The Design Review Committee reviewed the project plans on May 1 B, 199B, but could not forward a recommendation to the Agency because they had no quorum at that meeting. At its meeting of June 2, 199B the committee reviewed the revised plans and recommended approval of the project as described in Exhibit A and subject to conditions listed in Exhibit B of the Owner/Tenant Participation Agreement (see Minutes, Attachment A). óL - ( --- -- Page 2. Item ~ Meeting Date 08104/98 DISCUSSION: Site Characteristics The site for the proposed building is located at the northwest corner of Third Avenue and Ouintard Street (see Locator Map attached to OPAl, The proposed building pad is located at the south end of the neighborhood strip center formerly known as the Big Bear Shopping Center which includes several buildings located on five different parcels. Currently, this shopping center contains a fitness center, a drug store, an ethnic supermarket. other smaller shops, and a gas station. The pad for the proposed building is located at the southern most section of the shopping center next to Ouintard Street. The site for the project is in an commercial area and is surrounded by a variety of retail and service. oriented uses. Proiect Prooosal The proposal involves the demolition of the existing structure and the construction of a 7,OOO-square foot commercial building that will be occupied by a Kragen Auto Parts store. The project also includes the installation of new and increased landscape material, a new trash enclosure, and reconstruction of parking spaces on the north side of the proposed building. land Use Desianations Existina Uses General Plan Zonina Desionations Subject Site Vacant Bldg.. Retail Comm. CC-P North Parcel Shopping Ctr. Retail Comm. CC-P South Parcel Restaurant/Retail Retail Comm, CC-P East Parcel County/vacant bldgs. Retail Comm. CC West Parcel Shopping Ctr./Res. Retail Comm./Res. CC-P/Rl Land Use Comoatibilitv As shown in the previous table, the subject property has General Plan and zoning designations for Retail commercial uses, which allow the construction of commercial buildings such as the one being proposed. The project is consistent with the General Plan, the Montgomery Specific Plan, the Southwest Redevelopment Plan, and the Zoning Ordinance. c;2-ô) -- Page 3, Item .1. Meeting Date 08104/98 Parkina The proposal includes the reconstruction of ten parking spaces located on the north side immediately in front of the proposed building. Additional parking spaces are available in the shopping center parking lot. This parking is shared by the adjacent retail establishments, but is sufficient for the proposed and the exiting uses. LandscaDina The proposed landscaping for the project has been reviewed by the City's Landscape Planner, who found it to be adequate and in compliance with the City's Landscape Manual. One of the conditions of approval contained in Exhibit B of the Owner/Tenant Participation Agreement requires that the final landscape plan, prepared by a registered landscape architect, be submitted with the building permit application for final review and approval by the City's Landscape Planner. Reauired Street ImDrovements Due to the additional traffic generated by the project and for the purpose of preventing left-turn maneuvers into and out of the auto part store, the applicant will be required to install a median on Third Avenue, north of its intersection with Ouintard Street. Conclusion It is staff's opinion that the construction of the proposed building will be a positive improvement to this section of Third Avenue. The development of the project will contribute to the elimination of blighting influences by providing a new building and removing a dilapidated vacant building, and putting this portion of the parcel to a higher and better use, which furthers the goals and objectives of the Southwest Redevelopment Plan. FISCAL IMPACT: The project (including the building and site improvements) has an estimated valuation of $443,000. This will generate an annual tax. increment revenue of approximately $4,430, of which $1,725 will be allocated to the Southwest Redevelopment Project Area fund. Attachment A . DRC Minutes of May 18 and June 1, 1998 Attachment B - Owner/Tenant Participation Agreement with the following: Locator Map Exhibit A . Design Plans Exhibit B . Design Review and Agency Conditions of Approval IM1TI H:\HOME\COMMOEv\STAFF.REP\O8.04.98\third [July 28, 1998 12:00pmJI ,;2-3 --- .- -- RESOLUTION ..L§j4 RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING OWNER/TENANT PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT WITH MR, JOHN C. MaBEE AND CSK AUTO INC. FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A COMMERCIAL BUILDING AT 1396 THIRD AVENUE LOCATED WITHIN THE SOUTHWEST REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA WHEREAS, Mr. John MaBee is the ground lease holder of the property located at 1396 Third Avenue; and WHEREAS, CSK Auto, Inc. has entered into an agreement with Mr. John MaBee to lease said property and construct the proposed building for an auto parts store; and WHEREAS, CSK Auto Inc. has presented development plans for the development of the auto parts store building ("Project"); and WHEREAS, the site for the proposed Project is located within the Southwest Redevelopment Project Area under the jurisdiction and control of the Chula Vista Redevelopment Agency; and, WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator reviewed the proposed Project and determined that the proposed project is a Class 1(e)(2) Categorical Exemption pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act; and, WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee reviewed and recommended that the Redevelopment Agency approve the proposed Project subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit B of the OwnerfTenant Participation Agreement; and, WHEREAS, the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista has been presented an OwnerfTenant Participation Agreement, said agreement being on file in the Office of the Secretary to the Redevelopment Agency and known as document RACO 98-05, approving the development of a commercial building at 1396 Third Avenue, depicted in Exhibit A and subject to conditions listed in Exhibits B of said agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA does hereby find, order, determine and resolve as follows: 1. The proposed project is categorically exempt from environmental review pursuant to CEQA. 2. The proposed project is consistent with the Southwest Redevelopment Plan and Implementation PLan and shall implement the purposes thereof by assisting with the elimination of blight within the Project Area. 3. The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista hereby approves the OwnerfTenant Participation Agreement with Mr. John C. MaBee and CSK Auto, Inc. for the development of a commercial building at 1396 Third Avenue, in the form presented in accordance with plans attached thereto as Exhibit A and subject to conditions listed in Exhibit B of said agreement. Qì.-4 4. The Chairman of the Redevelopment Agency is hereby authorized to execute the subject OwnerfTenant Participation Agreement between the Redevelopment Agency and Mr. John C. MaBee and CSK Auto, Inc. 5. The Secretary of the Redevelopment Agency is authorized and directed to record said OwnerfTenant Participation Agreement in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego. California. Presented by: Approved as to form by: Ch'~~ <)~ ~ (;r Community Development Director {MZT)H,IHOMEICOMMDEVIRESOSI06-23-B81 1396THRD. RES ,;;-S' --. 1 -- ATTACHMENT A I MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF T~ JUN I 6 1998 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE ! ! Mondav, Mav 18, 1998 Conference Rooms 2 and 3 4;30 p.m. A. ROLL CALL MEMBERS PRESENT: Members, Spethman, Araiza, Morlon MEMBERS ABSENT: Chair Rodriguez, and Member Aguilar MSC (Spethmanl Araiza) (3-0) excused absence STAFF PRESENT: Ken Lee, Assistant Planning Director Martin Miller, Acting Senior Planner Beverly Blessent, Associate Planner Rick Rosaler, Principal Planer B. INTRODUCTORY REMARKS Acting Chair, Michael Spethman, made an opening statement explaining the Design Review process and the committee's responsibilities. He asked that all speakers sign in and identify themselves verbally for the tape. C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES MSC (SpethmaniAraiza) (3-0-2) to approve minutes for the meeting of April 20, 1998. MSC (SpethmaniMorlon) (3-0-2) to approve minutes for the meeting of May 12, 1998. ;J.-b -.. 'f Design Review Committee 2 May 18, 1998 D. PRESENTATION OF PROJECTS 1. DRC-98-23 Coors Amphitheater Otav Vallev Road Proposed silm packa!!e Staff Presentation Acting Senior Planner Martin Miller gave a brief review of the revisions to the proposed signs for Amphitheater. He made note that the monument sign originally proposed for the slope below the "twilight wall" has been deleted from the program. Mr. Miller pointed out that the monument sign at the southwest comer of Otay Rio Road and Otay Valley Road is larger than originally proposed and will be the main sign into the amphitheater. He than turned the presentation over to Krysen Hernandez. Applicant's Presentation Krysen Hernandez confJm1ed that sign previously proposed to be located on the berm has been deleted from the program, and that the sign at Otay Rio and Otay Valley Roads will be the primary monument sign. She briefed the Committee on sign colors/materials, the illuminated staged wave effect, and the west and east elevation signage. Member Spethman questioned the wave effect on the west gate signage. Ms. Hernandez explained that the signage there is not illuminated, it is a painted sign. Committee Discussion/Concerns All members concurred that the revised proposal was an improvement. No other comments were made. MSC (Spethman/Morlon) (3-0-2) to approve DRC-98-23 as submitted. ó2.-7 Design Review Committee 3 May 18, 1998 2. DRC-98-44 Olav Ranch SPA One Village Five Core Design guidelines and Master Precise Plan Staff's Presentation Beverly Blessent, Associate Planner, presented the proposal pointing out the projects location. She reviewed the site characteristics and explained what the design guidelines are use for. Ms. Blessent referred to the report for staff recommendations. Assistant Planning Director Mr. Ken Lee and Principal Planner Mr. Rick Rosaler gave a brief history of the Otay Ranch project and its precise plan. Member Michael Spethman asked if the Planning Commission has looked at the density for the project. Staff indicated that they had. Committeè Discussion/Concerns Member Spethman asked Craig Fukuyama, of The McMillin Company, if he had any objections to staff recommendations. He voiced no concerns, and said he was pleased with the "early California/Santa Barbara look. Member Spethman questioned what he thought was going to be a greenbelt around the project. Mr. Gary Cinti, of Cinti Land Planning, addressed the issue and pointed out the park sites and the linked pedestrian trails/walkways throughout the project. Mr. Ken Lee noted that pedestrian bridges are being proposed to connect the villages. Member Peter Morlon asked what nature of developments are being proposed. Mr. RicK Rosaler reviewed the overall plan. Member Araiza requested that the Design Review members receive a copy of the Village Design Plan. (MSC) (SpethmaniAraiza) (3-0-2) to approve DRC-98--44 with staff's recommendations. 02 - g Design Review Committee 4 May 18, 1998 3. DRC-98-35 Kragen Auto Parts 1340 Third Avenue Construct a new 7.000 s.f. building with associated site improvements Staff Presentation Mr. Martin Miller, Acting Senior Planner, reviewed the proposed project which entails demolishing an existing vacant restaurant building. He stated that the architectural style is very similar to that currently in existence in Rancho del Rey and Eastlake which reflects a Spanish/Mediterranean look. Mr. Miller referred to the report for staff recommendations and pointed out that the Engineering Dept. is requiring a seven foot dedication of right-of-way along Third Avenue. He handed out a material and color sample board to the Committee, and indicated that this project would have to be reviewed and approved by the Redevelopment Agency. Mr. Ken Lee, Assistant Planning Director, noted that the applicant is requesting to keep the existing freestanding sign. Staff recommends that this come back for DRC approval. Applicant's Presentation Tom McFall, the Construction Manager, confirmed that they will come back for DRC approval on the freestanding sign, and voiced no concerns with staff recommendations. Committee Discussion/Concerns Member Spethman expressed concern with the projects compatibility with the existing center. Staff addressed the issue, and indicated that though the building does not match the existing center's architecture, it was felt that it was an enhancement to the site and would set precedence for the center. Member Spethman stated that the proposed landscape solution for the project was good. Member Morlon questioned how the roof equipment would be screened. The applicant assured that all roof equipment would be screened by the height of the parapet. Member Araiza expressed dissatisfaction with the buildings architectural style. Discussion followed on the subject. MSC (Spethman/Morlon) (2-1-2) for DRC-98-35. This constitutes a no recommendation vote. The applicant had a choice to go forward to the Redevelopment Agency with a no recommendation from DRC, or to come back to DRC. The applicant requested to return to DRC with some revisions to the architectural design. ~- ~ --. l ' - Design Review Committee 5 May 18, 1998 E. STAFF COMMENTS Mr. Ken Lee, Assistant Planning Director, gave an update on the H & S Building that was approved by DRC and appealed by the neighboring property owner. He stated that the Planning Commission upheld the Committee's decision. L MEMBERS COMMENTS None G. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at 6:07 p.m. vp( ~~ (t~ Maureen Casper, Recorder H:\bomelplanning\moI5-l8-98.min ~-IO --- - .. - MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE Monday June 1. 1998 Conference Rooms 2 and 3 4:30 p.m. A, ROLL CALL MEMBERS PRESENT: Members, Spethman, Aguilar, Araiza, Morlan MEMBERS ABSENT: Chair Rodriguez, excused STAFF PRESENT: Martin Miller, Acting Senior Planner Jeff Steichen, Acting Associate Planner B. INTRODUCTORY REMARKS Acting Chair, Michael Spethman, made an opening statement explaining the Design Review process and the co=ittee's responsibilities. He asked that all speakers sign in and identify themselves verbally for the tape, C. APPROVAL OF MINUTES None D. PRESENTATION OF PROJECTS 1. DRC-98-28 Henrv's Market¡>lace 690 Third Avenue Relocation of Henrv's Market¡>lace into the old Luckv Store Buildin¡! Staff Presentation Acting Associate Planner Jeff Steichen presented the proposed project which he indicated was being brought back to the Co=ittee after being reviewed at the April 28, 1998 meeting. He reviewed the three items that were to be considered by the Co=ittee ~-II Design Review Committee 2 June 1, 1998 which are as follows: 1) an architectural solution for the south elevation of the building; 2) a design that is more user friendly for pedestrian travel and; 3) overall enhanced landscaping. Mr. Steichen stated that staff is satisfied with the solutions submitted by the applicant, and recommends approval. Committee Discussion/Concerns During discussions it was asked by Committee member Araiza, for the applicant to clarify the proposed landscaping for the project. Mr. John Zeibarth, project architect, stated that he feels that sufficient landscaping has been proposed, which includes the addition of three trees in the parking area and seven additional trees along "J" Street as well as additional plant material in the planter areas. Member Araiza noted his dis- satisfaction with the landscaping along Third Avenue. Discussion followed on the issue. Committee members and the applicant reviewed the screening of mechanical equipment, the trellis materials, and the material and colors for the ATM Kiosk. Member Spethrnan asked the applicant if there was a lighting plan for the south elevation. Mr. Zeibarth indicated there was not, but that it is feasible if so desired. MSC (Spethrnan/Morlon) (3-1-1) to approve the revisions that meet conditions I, J, and L of the approval letter dated April 23, 1998, and with an added condition M requiring the applicant to come up with a security lighting solution (attached or detached) along the south elevation, subject to review and approval by the Zoning Administrator. 2. DRC-98-35 Kragen Auto Parts 1340 Third Avenue Construct a new 7 000 s.f. building with associated site improvements Staff Presentation Acting Senior Planner, Martin Miller, reviewed the previous vote on the project which was a 2-1-2, which constitutes a vote of no decision/recommendation since a quorum (3) of the members must vote one way or the other for a decision or recommendation. He indicated that the previous conditions of approval have not changed since the last submittal. Mr. Miller made mention to the Committee the changes in the proposal which include: color and tile, architecture, and signage. ~ -Id- Design Review Committee 3 June I, 1998 Applicant's Presentation Tom McFall, the Construction Manager, voiced no concerns with staffreco=endations. Committee Discussion/Concerns During discussion, member Araiza stated that he would like to see the split face block at the base of the building be widen, He also expressed concern with the arches around the building. He felt that it would balance the architecture if all the arches were the same width. Discussion followed regarding the issue. MSC (Spethman/Morlon) (4-0) to approve DRC-98-35 with the conditions listed in the staff report with the following changes and/or additions: conds. 1-7 as is, added condo 8 to include that the split face block at the base of the building to be at least 3' in height at the south and north elevations; added condo 9 - to include an anti-graffiti solution for the entire building; condo 10 - the entry canopy to be in proportion with the other canopies around the building- 3. DRC-98-38 Fire Station No.4 3855 Paseo Ranchero Construct a 4 000 s.f. fire station and a 1. 740 s_f. trainine: classroom facilitY along with Darkin" and associated site improvements Staff Presentation Martin Miller presented the project which consists of 2 facilities, a fife station and a classroom which will be used in conjunction with the training tower already on site. Mr. Miller reviewed the site plan and the architecture which reflects the same style throughout the Rancho del Rey Planned Co=unity. He stated that the signage is standard, the landscaping needs to be slightly enhanced, and that staff would like to see the flag pole moved. Member Aguilar expressed concern with the site plan, and the access to the future library. Jim Hardiman, Fire Chief, addressed the issue and stated that the library was a few years off from being built, and seeing that plans have not yet been submitted for review, they could not hold up the fire station project. ó1-13 Design Review Committee 4 June 1, 1998 Committee Discussion/Concerns During discussions the following were reviewed by the Co=ittee and the applicant: solution for the flag pole, the use of the counyard and courtyard furnishings, the location of the fitness area, landscaping, and the architecture of the fire station. Member Araiza stated that the training tower is a dominating building, and that the fire station should reflect a continuous design. Member Aguilar again expressed her concerns with the project in relation to the future library, and felt she could not approve the project due to the site design without having the architect of the library review the site plan. Member Spethman expressed no concerns with the proposed landscaping, but did indicate that he too would like to see an alternate design solution for the fITe station, and agrees with member Aguilar on the site plan issue. After discussions, it was decided that the Co=ittee would continue the project so that the applicant could address the concerns expressed by the members, including a revised architectural solution, and to have the site plan reviewed by the library's architect. MSC (Spethman/Araiza) (4-0-1) to continue DRC-98-38 indefmitely. E. STAFF COMMENTS Mr. Martin Miller gave an update on the H & S Building that was approved by DRC and appealed by the neighboring property owner. He stated that the Planning Co=ission upheld the Committee's decision, but the neighboring property owner has now fùed an appeal to the City Council. This is scheduled to be heard at the June 23rd meeting. F, MEMBERS COMMENTS None G, ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at 6: 12 p.m. . /J ~~'1 ~,¿:2b1 Maurden Casper, Recorder H:\home\planninglmo\6-1-98.min (r.I c2- , ATTACHMENT B Recording Requested By: CHULA VISTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 276 Fourth Avenue ChulaVista,CA 91910 When Recorded Mail To: CHULA VISTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Attn: Yolanda Garda (Space Above Th/s line For Recorder; APN: 619.280.61 GROUND LESSEE/TENANT PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT 11396 Third Avenue] Mr John C Mabee. landlord and CSK Auto Inc. Tenant THIS AGREEMENT is entered into by the REDEVElOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, a public body corporate and politic (hereinafter referred to as "AGENCY"), and Mr. John C. Mabee, an individual ("MABEE") and CSK Auto, Inc., an Arizona corporation (hereinafter referred to collectively as "DEVElOPER") ellective as of August 4, 1998. WHEREAS, MABEE is the Ground Lessee under that certain Ground Lease dated June 6, 1969 originally between MABEE and William Marvin Company, a limited partnership which was recorded in the Ollicial Records of San Diego County on September 1, 1970 as Recorder's File Number 157783; and WHEREAS, CSK Auto, Inc. has entered into an agreement with MABEE to lease a portion of the property at 1396 Third Avenue for the development an auto parts store; and, WHEREAS, the DEVElOPER desires to develop real property within the SOUTHWEST REDEVElOPMENT PROJECT AREA which is subject to the jurisdiction and control of the AGENCY; and, WHEREAS, the DEVElOPER has presented plans for development to the Design Review Committee for the construction of a 7,000 square foot building to be used as an auto parts retail store (the "Project"); and, WHEREAS, said plans for development have been recommended for approval by said committee; and, WHEREAS, the AGENCY has considered the Design Review Committee's recommendation and has approved the Project and design plans subject to certain terms and conditions; and, WHEREAS, the AGENCY desires that said Project be implemented and completed as soon as it is practicable in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, the AGENCY and the DEVElOPER agree as follows: The foregoing recitals are incorporated into this Agreement. 1. The property to be developed is described as Assessor's Parcel Numbers 619.280.61 located at 1396 Third Avenue, Chula Vista, CA., shown on locator map attached hereto and by this reference incorporated herein ("Property"l. 1 c.2-/ã 2. The DEVelOPER covenants and agrees by and solely for himself alone, his heirs, executors, administrators and assigns and all persons claiming under or through them the following: A. DEVelOPER shall develop property in accordance with the AGENCY approved development proposal attached hereto as Exhibit "A", which is on file with the AGENCY Secretary, as Document No. RACD. 98.05. 8. DEVELOPER shall obtain all necessary federallstate and local governmental permits and approvals and abide by all applicable federal, state and local laws, regulations, policies and approvals. DEVelOPER further agrees that this Agreement is contingent upon DEVelOPER securing said permits and approvals. DEVELOPER shall pay all applicable development impact and processing fees. C. DEVELOPER shall obtain building permits within one year from the date of this Agreement and shall actually develop the Property into the Project within one year from the date of issuance of the building permits. In the event DEVELOPER fails to meet these deadlines, approval of DEVELOPER's development proposals shall be void and this Agreement shall have no further force or effect. O. In all deeds granting or conveying an interest in the Property, the following language shall appear: "The grantee herein covenants by and for himselt his heirs, executors, administrators and assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation ot any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, national origin or ancestry in the sale, lease, sublease, transfe~ use, occupancy, tenure, or enjoyment of the premises herein conveyed, nor shall the grantee himself or any persons claiming under or through him establish or permit any such practice of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection, IDeation, number, use or occupancy of tenants, lessees, subtenant lessees, or vendees in the premises herein conveyed. The foregoing covenants shall run with the land." E. In all leases demising an interest in all or any part of the Property, the following language shall appear: "The lessee herein covenants by and for himselt his heirs, executors, administrators and assigns, and all persons claiming under or through him, and this lease is made and accepted upon and subject to the following conditions: That there shall be no discrimination against or segregation ot any person or group of persons, on account of race, color, creed, national origin, or ancestry, in the leasing, subleasing, transferring use, occupancy, tenure, or enjoyment of the premises herein leased, nor shall the lessee himself or any persons claiming under or through him, establish or permit any such practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection, location, number or use, or occupancy of tenants, lessees, sublessees, subtenants, or vendees in the premises herein leased." 3. The Property shall be developed subject to the conditions imposed by the Design Review Committee and the AGENCY as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. DEVelOPER acknowledges the validity of and agrees to accept such conditions. 4. DEVELOPER shall maintain the premises in FIRST CLASS CONDiTION. A. DUTY TO MAINTAIN FIRST CLASS CONDITION. Throughout the term of this Agreement, DEVELOPER shall, at DEVELOPER's sole cost and expense, maintain the Property which includes all improvements 2 02 -I ~ thereon in first class condition and repair, and in accordance with all applicable laws, permits, licenses and other governmental authorizations, rules, ordinances, orders, decrees and regulations now or hereafter enacted, issued or promulgated by lederal, state, county, municipal, and other governmental agencies, bodies and courts having or claiming jurisdiction and all their respective departments, bureaus, and officials. II the DEVELDPER lails to maintain the Property in a "Iirst class condition", the Redevelopment Agency 01 the City 01 Chula Vista or its agents shall have the right to go on the Property and perlorm the necessary maintenance and the cost of said maintenance shall become a lien against the Property. The Agency shall have the right to enlorce this lien either by loreclosing on the Property or by lorwarding the amount to be collected to the Tax Assessor who shall make it part 01 the tax bill. B. DEVelOPER shall promptly and diligently repair, restore, alter, add to, remove, and replace, as required, the Property and all improvements to maintain or comply as above, or to remedy all damage to or destruction 01 all or any part 01 the improvements. Any repair, restoration, alteration, addition, removal, maintenance, replacement and other act 01 compliance under this Paragraph (herealter collectively relerred to as "Restoration"l shall be completed by DEVelOPER whether or not lunds are available Irom insurance proceeds or subtenant contributions. The Restoration shall satisly the requirements 01 any sublease then in effect lor the Property or improvements with respect thereto or, il no sublease is then in effect, shall be repaired or restored in the building standard shell condition existing immediately prior to the date 01 such damage or destruction. C. In order to enlorce all above maintenance provisions, the parties agree that the Community Development Director is empowered to make reasonable determinations as to whether the Property is in a lirst class condition. II he determines it is not, he (11 will notily the DEVelOPER in writing and (21 extend a reasonable time to cure. II a cure or substantial progress to cure has not been made within that time, the Director is authorized to effectuate the cure by City lorces or otherwise, the cost 01 which will be promptly reimbursed by the DEVelOPER. In the event that there is a dispute over whether the Property is in a lirst class condition or over the amount 01 work and expense authorized by the Director to cure, the parties agree that the City Manager or his designee, shall resolve that dispute; provided however, DEVelOPER shall have the right to appeal this decision to the AGENCY BOARD by making a written request therefor within ten (101 days 01 being inlormed 01 such decision. All City action to cure shall be suspended pending the outcome 01 the appeal. In the event that the Director decides without dispute, or the City Manager decides in dispute, that the City has to cure and the amount 01 cure, then DEVelOPER has to reimburse the City within thirty (30) days 01 demand. If not reimbursed, it constitutes a lien and City is authorized to record said lien with the County Recorder, upon the Property. D. FIRST CLASS CONDITION DEFINED. First class condition and repair, means Restoration which is necessary to keep the Property an efficient and attractive condition, at least substantially equal in quality to the condition which exists when the Project has been completed in accordance with all applicable laws and conditions. 5. AGENCY and DEVelOPER agree that the covenants 01 the DEVelOPER expressed herein shall run with the land. DEVelOPER shall have the right, without prior approval 01 AGENCY, to assign its rights and delegate its duties under this Agreement. 6. AGENCY and DEVelOPER agree that the covenants 01 the DEVelOPER expressed herein are lor the express benelit 01 the AGENCY and lor all owners 01 real property within the boundaries 01 the SOUTHWEST REDEVelOPMENT PROJECT AREA as the same now exists or may be hereafter amended. AGENCY and DEVelOPER agree that the provisions 01 this Agreement may be specilically enlorced in any court 01 competent 3 c.2-I'í _.. jurisdiction by the AGENCY on its own behalf or on behalf of any owner of real property within the boundaries of the SOUTHWEST REDEVElOPMENT PROJECT AREA. 1. AGENCY and DEVElOPER agree that this Agreement may be recorded by the AGENCY in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, California. 9. DEVElOPER shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless AGENCY and the City of Chu!a Vista, and their respective Council members, officers, employees, agents and representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims and costs, including court costs and reasonable attorneys' fees (collectively, "liabilities") incurred by the AGENCY arising, directly or indirectly, from (al AGENCY's approval of this Agreement, ¡bl AGENCY's or City's approval or issuance of any other permit or action, whether discretionary or non.discretionary, in connection with the Project contemplated herein, and DEVElOPER's construction and operation of the Project permitted hereby. 10. In the event of any dispute between the parties with respect to the obligations under this AGREEMENT that results in litigation, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorney's fees and court costs from the non-prevailing party. 11. This Agreement may be executed in counterparts which together shall constitute one and the same instrument. 12. To the extent DEVElOPER is comprised of more than one person or entity, each such person or entity shall be jointly and generally liable hereunder. 13. Time is of the essence for each and every obligation hereunder. SIGNATURE PAGE FOLLOWS 4 oJ-!'? SIGNATURE PAGE IN WITNESS WHEREOF THE PARTIES HAVE ENTERED INTO THIS AGREEMENT EFFECTIVE AS OF THE'OATE FIRST WRITTHi~ ABOVE. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA "AGENCY" DATED: By: Shirley Horton, Chairman "DEVELOPER" DATED: I \ 1~V\'b By: J CSK AUTO, INC. an Arizona corporation, Tenant DATED: By: DATED: By: NOTARY: Please attach acknowledgment card. APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: John M. Kaheny, Agency Attorney 5 r;2.- 19 --- 1 CALIFORNIA ALL.PURPOSE ACKNOWLEDGMENT , State of califOrnia }' - OPTIONAL SECTION - CAPACITY CLAIMED BY SIGNER County of San Diego Tho<Jgn ...... ooos not -... me """"" :0 IBI in 'ne data below. """9 $0 may cr~'. On July 23, 1998before me, Sherri L, De Mink, ~otary Public ,~to """""" retyn¡ on me "",,"mem. OATE NAMe. flT\..e Of' Of'FlceR. e.G.. "ANe ooe. ."'TARV puallC' 119 INDIVIDUAL drsonallY appeared JOHN C, MABEE , 0 CORPClRATE OFFICER(S) .'A"«SI OF SIGNeRISI TTTt.:ìSI personally known to me. OR . 0 proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence 0 PARTNER(S) 0 liMITED to be the perSOn(~hose name~ ~ 0 GENERAL subscribed to the within instrument and ac- 0 ATTORNEY.IN-FACT knowiedged to me that(fiè/sl:!!!Zmiiy executed 0 TRUSTEE(S) the same in ~h~r ~uthorized 0 GUARDIAN/CONSERVATOR f capacity{i~, and that by . I~r 0 OTHER: SHERRI L DE MINK signature(~n the instrument the person~ NoB~~p~åe¿~~~IWð~N!A ¡;¡ or the entity upon behalf of which the ~:~~~?ï¿;,°J~~~s!:? person(,a')..acted, executed 1I1e instrument. AUGUST 16, 1999 J SIGNER IS REPRESENTING: WITNESS my hand and official seal, - Of' peASC:N(S) OR EHTTT'flleSI Oh ~J\~ 'j, \)~fu~~ Third & Quintard Center SIGNATURE Of' "'TAR' OPTIONAl. SECTlON THIS CERTIFICATE MUST 8E ATTACHED TO TITLE OR TYPE OF DOCUMENT Ground Lessee/Tenant Particioation Agre THE DOCUMENT DESCRIBED AT RIGHT: 19 Effective 7/28/98 NUMBER OF PAGES DATE OF DOCUMENT Tnouqn me daIa requested hoto 's not """J<rOd by law. SIGNER(S) OTHER THAN NAMED ABOVE CSK Auto Inc, n coo'" prevent fraudulent reanaaunom 01 tru. form. ~-;;l) - State of Arizona ) ) ss. County of Maricopa) This instrument was acknowledged before me on --'-k\h¡ \5 , 1998, by Lon B. Novatt, Senior Vice President-Real Estate & General Counsel and Kevin 1. Groman, Assistant Secretary, of CSK Auto, Inc., an Arizona corporation, on behalf of said corporation. ..~ 6V/~ al9"C Notary Pu tic My Commission Expires: On [; \L",\11<¿J . OFFICIAL SEAL I \ ESPERANZA RO3S Notary Public. Slate of Arizona MAF;ICOPACOUNTY MyComm. Exp. Aug.16, 1998 .:2 -.1.. I ~\ '% ~ JEROMES FURNITURE OUTLET PROJECT LOCATION 'i,í\\£.£.í r--- CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT LOCATOR Ä~~¿~'i.1T: Kragen Auto Parts PROJECT DESCRIPTION: C) DESIGN REVIEW PROJECT 1396 Third Avenue Request: Proposal to demolish exisUng restaurant and construct ADDRESS: a 7000 sq. ft. commercial building. SCALE: I FILE NUMBER: ~-';¿d- NORTH No Scale DRC-9B-35 h:\homelplanning\carlos~ocators\drc9835.cdr 4/22/98 š g¡ EXHIBIT A m ." !; \\, z '<';':------:¡;-3< \-:::7-:-,,\~ ,.'// ¡,f. i~: \i. .\ ~~ \ ..~\ \ \ \ \ \-,- ! \ \ @""'@@@@@",, @@G"'@@GJ@G@8@GJ - '" I' ¡"". ~ H¡jjpiIIWHI,'¡¡np¡ ~ ¡¡if! ","¡;", ~ !ili!m ~ l!ie!B~í!¡¡'P¡!~ ~ IIIII ~ IN!! ffi î i ! pi! I P , h ¡ II II !I II II n II ~ ! ¡IIi¡! "Ii I¡ H'ìl!,q,¡~ ¡ì'l!il ! ! 11 ¡ ¡ ~ !! Iii - 3 O~~X!l1 I!I: ~cu1~ ~ .'IDro,u:, ~ ,. -LJ' ¡ii, ~ _v KAAGE:"=.PARTS Itdiio¡!,u;l~~ ..... ¡ ,11 13..THRDAve,,"e "'~- .. CHLt.A V1STA. CAl.FORNIA ""~ Cô ." r 0 0 '" "0 r > Z 0--- -- @---- ~ ~ i~l= <rJ <rJ""" @ @O>@ @ @@ @@@@ 8@8<308<3080 0 ~'.. . . ¡:; !¡~!!I 11 ! UP,'! ! ! II ,: qH ii! ¡¡¡ !! II n ¡ PI ,¡¡II ~ llII! 1¡1. !i!i II!II! ~I-! ¡¡¡WI -< ¡¡II¡¡i¡'lilh"J'i'liT' ZII!I,.¡.;,'!<I¡¡¡-I!! ~ Inl!IiI¡¡!I!i!!¡¡!!!I!I!i!¡!~ ¡¡¡P!i ! ¡II!II Prll!!!I¡!!I!!!!¡ "II ¡1!i!¡d,I¡P¡I¡!I!!h! ¡I~ 1,1111 ! !!.!!!i!I!!i¡!!!! ,I e ¡II,!' -, . I' ¡, en "¡'. !I' ¡ I '¡ ¡H,!ii!I!!:!!i IhdPN!d!!!I! I!I: ~au10 ~ ¡¡;o.X!],Lc. ¡!! I ~ -- KRAGEN AUTO PARTS Itt¡'¡¡ec~~.~,:Ig,"J '., 13.. ~:'~ENUE """I::':; CHlH VlSTA. CALFORNIA .....- ë:; " 5ë -I c: :D m -0 r- > z r , I ~ m:"S¡ !! -I '¡II I ! II ;;¡ \:., !I > C,¡ 'I ~ Ii: I ~ !I: ¡ z ,I -I .' ~ WI ) !'~ ¡I ~ II'i 'I §¡ ,¡!¡!! ¡ K ' !¡ -I! î d I ~ ' ilí ~ , r- ¡¡II ~ 'í g ~n¡ , LJ . ! :D . . @--- !. ~ ~ 'lil"!II!li O~. ..'11"11 0----- m ~ ! "I ! I II ~ ~ ¡ii, U!l!i, ¡hi 1*, en {," \: I!! % / !iil ,I h ¡ ill ~ I i'!i ¡'I I\! III z ' ¡I¡I I I CO) ¡, I' i' I Ii , ! ~ ¡¡¡Ii II !¡ ~ ~ Iii! I 'I' g~lli¡' I' ~!~!&\ . ~ ¡'if ¡~ ~ ~ ~ r- - """88 e ¡¡¡ , ," ! I' IIIP"II'j CO) ¡I! Ii ¡ ,'mo. mmwlI i\j !I!¡I!!'I!¡'~ 'l!i.!I!!lm¡¡¡!m¡¡¡¡¡¡i, ~ \ 'i : ¡III !!J h. :'!l1 h '¡'Iii" II' ~ Illi!ÌiI¡!¡~ W!¡!!¡!!I!ì¡! Ii ;:;: !¡¡.'I!'¡.!~:!! ,,¡i¡¡i¡I¡'¡¡¡i¡ II en I I '¡oil >< !I Ii" , i I ili hi ~ ,I, '1' ¡ , il!!!1¡¡~ !!'¡i' i ! I! Ih¡ ~ .2... ¿S- III : I"eJ . -~ IffiÐ:H, Lc. i ¡ I' ~a..Hl° KRAGEN AUTO PARTS ~,w;I",!",;.~,:Ig,"J , ¡ e 13.. '::'~ENUE ~ -,:".': .. e><lA.A V1STA. CAU"CRNIA .."'~ ~ ~ ~ - m ~ Z m 0 m 0 > c m ~ m ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ m ~ m m < m < < > < > ~ ~ ~ ð ~ ~ ~ z ~ ~ ~ , , , ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ",-"""_ee"e",,,eeeEJeG::; 1¡;;¡¡;;¡SElSiO '" "".- , II III I' 'jW ! i' I !~ I ~ ! 'Illiti I !¡'iq¡I!iillí¡!¡'lli m¡!¡I¡¡¡I!i¡¡',¡ 11111:l11!1 ¡ j ¡. II ï I I'" , ~ ,~, . ~ -.1' 1\11 m ¡'Iii ¡'!WI¡I¡~ ¡'¡!!II!III¡n ~ ¡¡¡!lii!,¡¡ , , d"l. ,. ì ~ m !.,,' i i ¡¡-ii', !I Ii m "~!!Ii '" 'I ¡ s: II I il I I I ! ! ~¡ ¡ I I: in ! I ¡ ¡II' . . Ii! .! !' .1 ¡ Ii II . ¡ . ¡ ,i I¡ S \ II I: I I ¡ I Þ q ~-~, I!!: ~aufo ~ !fl"_~Lc. ¡! ¡ I ~ -~ KRAGEN AUTO PARTS hdilecJ;n..t.!:l~ '., 13.. 'ñ,~~ENUE "',~'::: C><Lt.A VlSTA, CALFCRNIA ."...... .,,-...--.."'" .._.."..,-",-,...- ...,..--"...".....".."",-".".._. .,.---...,."..,....."........... """"" ....._. ..... ,.........----....", """"",,-, ','."U,"',,'II',I¡!~,--I'cc",'ù~,"""""1111 "',:',',.:,""','¡,';,""'!,"','."'!",",,'!',','~,"I""¡",¡'.',<';¡","""',!',-'!,'" 1\-'-' ,.:" ,-,"-'-;" '¡;'¡¡'¡!'¡'J"",¡¡";",,,"¡""'¡¡\j'j'1,'!!'~!¡'¡Ii':"~ r~"""q;"¡';Ii~~!"" """'¡H-I>,'dì!j,,;;J""I":'¡'I,,,,¡¡¡-,',ì¡"Wji ,',,'iii'.!I"I'," ri~!¡¡;;:i¡j¡¡¡b¡¡íi¡1\qH¡¡¡,¡!¡¡¡d1qHH.¡¡¡¡U¡;,g~" 'iOH,¡P¡"",-¡""¡¡,,,P,,!.¡¡¡I',~-!,-,-,,!,~.,I~ ¡q¡¡;,',;,!!,¡¡¡¡',','¡;,:,i,¡, ¡I. ,¡j,¡~,¡ !¡,,','.¡!¡'¡,;¡,¡,~¡1¡!¡¡ ¡j¡,¡~','¡,r¡,H,:¡ ""j'nO""""'!; ",Ld!!'!'!'!';!!"'" ';',!",'<'n'Pf""H'~dj'" H¡'¡¡!d¡.q:q(q",i¡¡¡¡¡¡!j¡ ¡H!!¡!h¡¡¡'H,¡¡í¡I¡!ì¡11Uiu!!ni:!,11ï¡,,¡ì¡P¡ !";O,¡,¡ ¡ìb,,' Hi', j!¡î¡¡pI¡¡!!m¡¡PI!i¡!!i!!¡!¡I!¡¡¡n!¡:¡np,;i¡ ,¡J 1~,I¡'mm"'~ :;"¡'í"¡,!!¡¡ë,!""",!¡I,,,,,!¡I!¡¡!!""¡,,¡¡¡\~,!,;,I¡~¡í,, I ' ¡ '^ I "1' '.,' '" ,,' , " j" i I ¡ '¡'. '0 IJ'" ", n '¡, - " I' ! I' ,¡..""",.".,¡, 1¡;¡;,:",!¡:~q,¡¡,~'¡¡h;¡¡¡¡¡,.¡!I~',~¡,~~,,;,,',,' -, . "." , , , , " ,-., "" , ' ." ," ,,¡ - ¡... ¡ , . ,'. í"'"~i""J)~""""!1 h!"'¡"¡,""'!'¡¡" ¡i'I",!"'!"!" 'ii" iil!iWI!I!il::"';~::;lli'lilim!il!i!I!!'lilili¡iil¡1!Iiiil! ¡'¡',I' '" ,III 'II, ' "', !'I,' '" i ! ! ! ",' ,";' '," ï 'i' ¡" ',' " ! ¡! : 1" . '!I t¡: ~ : ¡ , : Ii: ,; HIE ¡ Ii! 'I! ¡! :1 ,I!!I,II]:: II' .' ;¡ ¡.¡ ¡ ¡ ¡ ! ! ';! .!I ¡ ! ! ¡.. ¡ ¡ i¡¡"(')Ui'þ......---lJ " " "I J, !cthi-"',",J;tiF,",l¡¡'¡-Œ,:'E'il \iE!,oB ~.;;-£' -:i& II 'I I I Iii" " -- -- 11 11-- --=-- miS n rr ..,:, ".. ()() "" n ij;ij; ~~ 00 xx B "" - - ---_. 'Dr <"'" ~ 0 x '" ! "8¡;~! I' ~f,'~~ ;;~~¡¡¡ "m>\J I~~~~ ,;;1m" r~~,. mQ~ , ¡~~ 1 "<" /THIRD AVE IAAlðATION,I",~, N ~",."',.',,,"-,.',',"" ,~,";C enD",' ANI:) NO~]~~<'" COd (~~} ~~I R eEl) " ucc "'" _c. 1 "" ""---"""" .--....-. -.. ,,- .'.-c..---...,.................-.....-. '-.... ._-.... "'----""',""." .,..--"... .""."""""".'.'-'-"-"'.""" !¡ ¡¡¡ !!: ! !J ¡ '" ',j,~ i' ; ~ ¡ ¿ ! '[' ¡ ¡ ~ !\>!~' .~"~ji ¡ ~ ( ~,.. / <."..,'...",-,>_,,'~e~~., '. .. "."...,.'.,','.'.'",'".",.,,"'.,",.'...1',...'\ " I/J ~. ~ .. ....~ ~ -:ivr:..l iCf /~¥\ '\ ,¡ II ¡ : "'i' I ! , : '¡: ill? ! ¡nil ì!!t!!¡ hI! Ii ' ..~, n' h . .,. .. , » ¡ I.' ~ ~ J ~ :r () " () G ¡ . ~ z ~ " o¡ () ". '.. ö ~ . ~', F (; II\~ Ii ~ ~ .~~. i , ~ '¡'¿:"1i\.. \ ' I II ,1,\' ~ /~",.\._, In:, II. ¡ ¡ I~.~~.~'ìl, 'I"'::' ¡! P !¡¡ ¡ " 1 . ¡¡ ¡ ¡¡¡ , ¡I, ¡,! ¡ ¡ï 'j; Ii¡ ¡ 'i ¡ ; ~ ¡ ¡ ! ¡! I.. ¡ ,,' ¡ þ ; : 1!, ,¡ " ¡ "¡ \J" ì ì¡ ¡ ¡ ~~^ ð~o ~" 1h c -e",; ¡¡¡~,'~ ~ ¡¡ § 1 o;! X. ~. m '~. ,.. ~ I, ~ " ' ~ rz$¥- I § ;¡ ~ I § ~ ~ "~"':-'.-" ~ 0 () '" .. .\ &. .,' c. ~ ~ -z ,~, F-: '-p-- <. ~ 0 C ~ ~ ~ 0 .. . Iii! ill ~::;:':,.,,'"',.., .."."", g L-2 jY;'¿;CP,f*".w"" DAVID REED "" , " 'A ; HEr "" IE .. '^" ...-,",...".....,._. ...-."....... """_"---".....".....",.. _,0-- ""..-...... ..-- ..".. """"""""--""-"""" I¡!! 1!I!Hlli Pili rm m !!!!i!1i ~ I II!! ! ¡¡ ¡¡¡ Ii' !l1!!Ii! 'jli!il!!!! ¡i¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡j!I¡!¡¡¡¡¡I~!!1 '¡I! ì ;~jW! -¡¡alp e¡lil¡!~ II!!il!I;!)¡!!i 111 ¡I'll I¡! ~¡ '!j'¡ ¡~!! ~j!¡I¡ ~ ¡ii' ¡ (t .,t" P!,;¡:, I)j ,,! ';1 ¡, ,; is;;, ¡!Iii!! ~ U'! Ii '¡ i 'ii II ï !~ j ¡¡I ¡II ¡I! ¡¡i! i!i Ii ¡ Ii ¡I! IIi ¡ II ¡I!! ¡I! ¡! ! !II ! ¡W ! I¡i;;!;';;;! ..; ;\!~,d¡ 2;¡:'i'i¡i'í'¡,¡,¡ !i~ii ¡!~ ¡! II ili! i~ ; ¡II!!II! I' 'j! ~.. "! I, ¡ ¡¡ "~, ¡¡ ¡ j ì ,d I-I ¡ ¡; ¡, ¡ i' Ýlil~ij Ii 111: Ii (i 1IIIil! IAAliSoATION ce."e-- $P8.:G.IJ-I~ATIONS G"~{'1" ~-" ",.. ".,,' I"~ - Ë~"~O&"""'€"HO" . . ". C'D" ., e;-~: L S ';è"£;'-- ----- .".:. 'd.'1 :~"o' 6 DAVID REED LANDS-C ARCHITeCTS 2",e"DeAI"",sue"'S'"DI'OOCALefO""'A"'D""""'-''DO ,. ..-- ",...,...-- ..-...,..." "'--"'.m...-. .....",......_...._m...'......................-:~--' -';':'~'¡.'--;:-~_"M'" ¡ 'I I Ii I ~_.2.. : 11 ¡ ¡ ¡ ì ¡ , ¡:I r ¡ , I ¡ , , , , ~ ¡ - , , , -I ! ! ¡ ! ¡ ! I ¡ ~ ¡ ¡ ¡ î ; ! ¡ ¡ .. ¡'!! ¡ ¡ I 1."" r "' -I " , ': ~ , ¡ " ~ i ; , ; ¡ ¡ ¡ RI"'" "RIm ~~~ rr~ ..0. ~~~ ~t ~~!t ~ç~ ~~~ ~ij¡" ~~,. t~ ~~ ~~ J:~ IPç> ~ ~ iiI ~ {:. HI R D AYE I"L.ANTINð I"L.AN L-4 .", .. ~ -- 0')- r ., " I) "" ,.. "'-"'.""'-",'." -....-......- '.""""--","'--"""'" '.. "M .-...-,......-..--. ..,,"co"- .........-_.... ..." ..--.'.."._...~_. "'" """'" \;!~":'rn¡;,..,.:,;,;:¡;¡",¡..,¡;:êi'r1::¡¡;'" ¡"PH ~ë~ g ¡pi ¡¡ ¡i ¡H¡ ¡:¡ :Ui ¡Ii I m¡¡;n! n¡¡ j L HI Hun : ~! ! ¡ ¡ m : ; :!;,111. ¡h¡¡! u¡¡¡.híip, ì,,¡:!i.' ¡q ;¡nnn¡pIiH ~!,!~..H ~~¡ ~.e ~ ¡d!¡!!i¡!!1¡;¡!!!¡ !!!jH¡¡¡n!¡ ¡¡¡¡WII; !'j¡ \H~!! 'i! é~ p I "., ,I¡.. ',¡P""""i"""'¡"'!J!""" ¡'""" ". Z 'li~q¡!¡¡¡lh¡¡¡'I;¡"~f¡H;¡¡,n¡Î!¡¡ ~¡g~¡!~; '~-I ¡¡,11;.'¡¡¡,¡!¡!!;¡!¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡'ni!n¡,¡¡¡~:¡'!~¡ P. B Z .. " "',' .. ,¡¡. -~ . ¡. ,¡¡, 'i ,¡,.., , ! '.. F'" .., .. @ IJ¡n¡.,¡î¡ii¡:.H.,:;'¡¡,¡¡!i'¡,,!¡,\! ,!~ I:.. '.~ l ~ Ii ., , ¡ ¡i ¡ ¡- 51 . .~, ¡.. ,,; !'" j , ¡ I, j : ; j ,~, ,! ¡ .. !,¡!I'!¡!'!ì¡j¡,.;!¡~,¡¡¡!j.!í"!¡.'.!P!:.,,'¡¡ z ¡ ,O¡ ¡ '1' ¡ ¡"~ ¡ ,. ¡ ~, 1" ," ¡ ,! j " , I ,1 ,-,.\ , i ,() ¡ idn¡ . ;H~ oil! ' f ~!p¡l!!q q¡ ~~~! ~¡ !-i ;!IP!¡¡¡n¡¡¡;¡'!;¡j¡ÌHP¡¡!n¡¡¡~ B ;~ ¡ ¡ ¡¡ ¡, ; ¡;oj ~ 'il i! ¡¡i'1;¡ ¡¡ ¡ i 3" ¡ ,¡ , '¡Hili¡:,!!!: !¡¡!!¡!i;¡d~¡i! ~¡ ~ : ¡I. . ¡ ;, ; ¡ :~ ¡ "N ¡ '.! 1,!; '0, õ, ' ~ !! ; I '! , , " ¡.', , ¡ "." ,.. \ ~ , ! ì' ¡; ~ ¡ !~ ¡ I¡'!, : q ¡ !; í . I ¡ ¡ ',,' ¡,' II ï I, ~"¡ @j 1,1 ' " T ~- "":, Ð, '" » ". @ ~ ;,'~¡ ~ (\r ~ . . (»> €'?:i\: !£ ¡<¡;II ~~".~ ;0 ~~ ;;w. ìi p~ ~!¡;¡ ~ ij~ ¡~, ~ i~ f¡¡ ~ j "' , U (\ ~ìmê~í! ,I"",~Q~~ < m",¡m "J¡"," 11 !';;~"I- ~ ¡ Ò~" : x ~ ~ ~ . " ~ ~ m ~ ç ~ g ~ to) P,! MW'," P¡,.ANTI¡'¡S NO"Æ$ """~, ANI:> DeTAI!.!> "U", L-:;; ¡ ~~:Xig£", .='c; - ø2 ~.3 I "'" ; .. 1/[[1) ANDSCAI'E AI,CIII S , '" c " , '" , """ ,'" 0 ,,' , , , , c , , '" 'I' _e..._.....,,-...--._e."'" '-'--"""""U_"""-""",,- -"e.-..' .e"'e""'-"---e'".,---""...'-" --,,'e".- e..,--. ¡I;!:! :1 ;¡¡i','¡¡¡;¡¡' jj;!!,:¡nlj¡¡ ;¡,;I ¡'¡leil1e ¡~ !¡,U¡I¡¡!¡'¡;¡i îjH¡î¡jn~¡¡¡ ~¡¡ ~7 ..", I ",¡¡!,,!, ""',.e1IW '-¡ 'I.r . ¡"'e' ¡i'" ""e\ ¡ìe' FeJ-e,,'h .e" 3" 1 ,,:> i W; il ¡I 1;1: ¡¡ 'hi;":!!~ '!! Ç6 ",,! ¡,\~,~:<§¡ liQ,1"5¡,! "Z~ >, .., 'j ¡,., '. ,-¡.-, " I", ., =':> ¡ ¡¡" " I"e ¡'ee'! ¡I 'e'* j' 'eie,:, 'i ¡;¡" ¡¡i I; ¡¡!i;¡ ¡¡ !¡) 11 jj Ii! ¡¡ m "Jee ¡ I' 'i,' ,¡ 'j' '1~' I'! '; ~ I:¡ ! ,~I;,I '1 !¡! !! I; ,i, ~¡ ~ ¡I! ¡ I¡ ill! 11 !¡¡ I¡ Ii ¡I I! @ ! 'e ¡ I ,," , 'I -e[ ~, ,! ¡I z ;! ¡ in! 1; I' ¡¡ I; ¡ ¡ ¡:~¡¡¡¡!;;!¡¡¡i~j¡î¡il¡¡¡¡¡m¡¡¡¡ mw¡,¡¡ 11!¡ I!:¡!¡¡¡¡¡¡¡îi!¡mm¡ ¡¡~e'~.ì,¡¡¡:;~",¡;,¡~¡¡t!¡¡!¡"!¡¡;¡¡¡¡d!ì:1 ¡;"ì i;¡~e¡¡;¡~,,;J!!¡e¡ìe¡~¡'e¡ ¡¡;¡¡¡¡:¡¡í:~¡¡':¡¡¡B¡!~¡";¡;li"L¡¡¡¡¡' ~¡, ;1;¡!d.¡)~1'¡¡ì¡¡¡~i¡ j!j!';I¡¡¡¡Jpi¡e¡:!I!!!¡I!j!!'d¡'I!¡'¡,¡le ¡¡I ¡¡¡¡el¡¡'e¡¡ì!¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡!¡ ~m!l¡u:¡¡q,!¡!¡:¡i!Ìì¡¡¡I; ¡q! :,¡ ¡¡;i¡¡:¡:¡!,I~ ¡¡p !¡H!!!î!¡!!!¡I!! !Im;¡!d ! !II¡! !: ¡ I¡I¡:! ¡!¡i! l!í ¡Ii! !;;; ¡'e;¡'e'e:m ì ¡¡¡ H: ¡!¡ .,I¡ j ; I:;;ee ¡ ;e ¡,Î¡!1¡ee ,~me :!; le'e:!! ..,' ""',en' g,. ,., .¡, ¡ , ,"e-' . , .. .", "," ,) "'I ¡¡!!¡¡!iUI!!¡iI¡¡j¡!i¡I¡lì¡¡¡!i !!¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡¡ì! ¡!i ¡~¡nr!l!j¡¡¡¡IP!¡ ¡¡III! II I'!!ii!!¡¡¡ I!I ¡!, Ó, 1" , J I ,¡ ~,' I . ! I; 'I ; j' """"",\e"'I"'I-'""'1'1""1,",e .e"le,.""",),.e"!"",.,-.",,,",- >"."¡,, ¡¡e;.,1:¡i'¡¡¡!eË~Hq¡¡He'1!¡j¡¡¡¡¡¡~!1 !:ej¡¡¡ ì'e;¡g!~~ Wîei!¡¡¡'¡emme',.:U!¡ ß!!!!¡e;e¡ . e'e""'i'il,i.,q¡j¡¡,,¡,¡,I¡lpI"'" '"'¡",iL,(",J."",""",,,,¡,! '¡'f¡ ¡e';e¡e:¡q¡¡'~e"-¡;~¡e'P¡¡'e¡¡';!eHe'¡"'e'e!1!¡jeee~ !i"¡¡ll!e¡!e¡;e'¡!!I~ìe'e'¡'e;1Ieje';-e!e'¡".'e¡!e¡e;e¡e~e,¡ee!;¡ I¡'.¡.¡'e:;.í ""'I"¡!,I",,,!"!O-"r"""' '¡-'-¡'¡" """i"¡"""¡""" "'" !í!¡!¡¡!¡¡!¡¡!¡¡!¡¡:¡¡~!'¡¡;¡!!!~h ibm¡'!!i!!¡ !¡!¡¡j!!:!j!¡'¡!~¡¡¡!ì ¡!;!¡; î:e'e¡!ei¡!.!e"¡;íeÌiî¡¡ie1iie¡¡¡IJ!¡eei!i'ie! ¡¡ele:e¡e¡¡¡!':~I¡¡!'¡e¡~"e¡ì'e:1¡¡eII!;! le;;e:e!'ee' I; ¡ji!!!!!!!!! ¡!Iml d!¡I¡¡! II ¡ill! ¡m! '¡¡¡¡I! m~¡ ¡¡j¡P¡ ¡¡!!il I' , I';'~¡ ,,;¡ 'I"~ I' ! ¡\I;>:! !\ H'! ;,," ¡,':'¡ '1" ,I".. ! ""I' ¡¡!:!I¡;!!!iI!W!!!!!¡¡i¡¡I! ¡!¡I! III!! ¡lli!!!ii¡ ¡¡!ili I¡ï!i! !¡ ¡ "¡¡ii )' 'I ¡'" ,! ! ¡¡-: ¡I' b ¡¡¡I' \,¡¡, ,1",1 ;;¡ i '~;í! ¡ "11) !! ¡ ¡! '¡í! ! ¡ II ¡ ¡1 ;1,; if ¡¡ . ~'~D¡ ¡¡"i: i¡! ¡; !~¡ ¡ ¡!'¡¡! !! !¡¡ " ¡', ' " i ' ,! ¡,' , ! ',! d¡ . el; II ¡¡ ¡¡ , I I-ANDeGAF-.. ""ÆC"' S;=ec,Ii"I(jATIC'NS g::~." :..¡,- T"" ; ,r:----=-;: L - 6 cce'H"'.""""fi ee c- ""'-'.....'"'-" 'C""'"~",~e;"'-' o:::;:':.:i.:t ':-,-;;,0' 6 DAVID "EFD LANDSCAPe ARCHlfECfS ", "",^ "'-'""" U DECO C^"'O",," "CO, "'" ," "" ." 1'- EXHIBIT B Conditions of Approval Ground lessee/Tenant Pårticipation Agreement Mr. Juhn Mabee and CSK Autu, Inc. 1396 Third Avenue Chula Vista, CA DESIGN REVIEW CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Construct the Project as submitted for Design Review Committee consideration, unless otherwise modified herein. 2. Submit a revised landscape plan at the time of submittal for building permits for review and approval by the landscape Planner. The final landscape plan shall be prepared by a registered landscape architect. 3. Revise proposed signs as follows: North and south elevations: Reduce both signs to a maximum of 100 sq. ft. in area. East and west elevation: Reduce both signs to a maximum of 70 sq. ft. in area. Obtain building permits from the Building and Housing Department and a sign permit from the Planning Department prior to installing any signs. 4. Obtain construction permit for any work to be performed in the public right.of.way, which may include but not necessarily be limited to, the following: A. Replacement of damaged curb or other improvements. B. Installation of "pin.on" raised median, four feet wide by approximately 150 feet long, with decorative concrete finish to match the existing median to the north and "Keep Right" signs at either end. 5. Payment of Sewer, Traffic Signal and Development Impact Fees (to be calculated upon submittal of building permit). Fees will be on a pro rata basis, taking into consideration the former restaurant being replaced. 6. At time of submittal ior building permits, submit evidence of square footage of the restaurant and numberftypes of plumbing fixtures contained in the building to the Engineering Division. The OeveloperfTenantsfApplicants shall execute this document by signing the lines provided, said execution indicating that the property OeveloperfT enants/Applicants have each read, understood, and agreed to the conditions contained herein. Upon execution, this document shall be recorded, as part of the Ground lesseefTenant Participation Agreement to which it is attached and a part thereof, with the Clerk of the County of San Diego, and a signed, stamped copy returned to the Secretary to the Redevelopment Agency with a copy to the Community Development Department. Failure to sign this document shall indicate the property Oeveloper's'fTenants'fApplicants' desire that the project and the corresponding application for any and all City permits be held in abeyance without approval. SIGNATURE PAGE FOllOWS c:2-.33 --- - ..- -~.~~.~~- ~N" . . ~ - . '.' . < EXHIBIT B Condition:; of Appnlval . , @"""'" US...~ ,.....,........,- .;,. f. John Mail8e and CSK Aam. ¡~ -,,:. . 1396 Thin! AnnoB thai. Vim. CA SlWTURE PAGE ~ -UEVELDPER8 DATED: ~h", \ ,,~ ~~("-~ ~ IlIiIIL GROUND S and LANDLORD i r ~ ~ \ CSK ALITC,INC. an Arizona Cll'mDn. ierwn ... ',,-- 1/¡j/r j - DATED:, By: DATED; 1vlrl By: ~_ISI- ", ". ; .." 02-34 _u - -- JOINT REDEVELOPMENT AGENCYICOUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item .3 Meeting Date 08/04/98 ITEM TITLE: COUNCIL RESOLUTION /" f ~ AGENCY RESOLUTION 1'6-'$ APPROVING THE DOWNTOWN HOLIDAY LIGHTING PROGRAM CONCEPT AND DIRECTING STAFF TO DEVELOP A DETAILED PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN AND AN AMENDMENT TO THE TOWN CENTRE I FINE ARTS POLICY TO INCLUDE THE DOWNTOWN HOLIDAY LIGHTING PROGRAM SUBMITTED BY: Commo"", D~,.",,"t o;m."'á.9;¡' REVIEWED BY: Executive Direct°rvR ~ -? (4/Sths Vote: Yes- No--X..! COUICIL REFERRAL #3058 BACKGROUND: Because Christmas holiday lights and displays on Candy Cane Lane were discontinued, the City Council directed City staff to explore the possibility of continuing the holiday lighting tradition on Third Avenue in the Downtown. The idea was initially submitted to the Downtown businesses and several concerns were raised. As a result, Council directed staff to work with the Downtown Business Association to develop a viable holiday lighting display and program for the 1998 holiday season. A task force was formed and numerous alternative lighting projects and programs were discussed and evaluated. A final holiday lighting program was developed and approved by consensus of the task force which was subsequently approved by the Downtown Business Association. The program concept is being submitted to the Council and Agency for consideration which includes a recommendation to come back to Council with a detailed project implementation plan and an amendment to the Town Centre I Fine Arts policy to allow for the expenditure of Fine Arts funds for this project. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council and Redevelopment Agency adopt a resolution: 1) Approving the proposed Downtown Holiday Lighting Program concept; 2) Directing staff to return to the Council/Agency with a detailed program implementation plan; and, an amendment to the Town Centre I Fine Arts Policy to include the Holiday Lighting Program. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: In March of this year, the Downtown Holiday Lighting Task Force finalized a Holiday Lighting Program recommendation for consideration by the Downtown Business Association and the City Council/Redevelopment Agency (see attached Exhibit "A"). On March 17, 1998, the Downtown Business Association Board of Directors approved the proposed Downtown Holiday Lighting Program as presented and recommended that it be submitted to the City Council/Redevelopment Agency for consideration. ..3 -I Page 2. Item ..3 Meeting Date 08/04/98 DISCUSSION: In accordance with the City Council's direction, a task force was formed to develop a viable holiday lighting program in the Downtown for the 1998 holiday season. The task force was comprised of the President of the Downtown Business Association, the Town Manager, several Downtown Merchants, a Member of the City's Economic Development Commission, and City staff. T ask force members investigated the 1997 lighting displays at the City of Orange (publicly financed displays) and the City of Fresno (privately financed displays) as well as the display presented by Princess Resorts at Mission Bay. Several lighting options were investigated for the Downtown area such as pay.per.view displays along Third Avenue and/or in Memorial Park and a trolley ride circuit to view displays along Third Avenue. In addition, the task force considered the concerns voiced by the Downtown merchants regarding the possible closure of Third Avenue during the holiday shopping season, potential fees to drive through decorated Third Avenue, vehicle traffic patterns, and litter problems. After considerable discussion, investigation, and evaluation, the task force determined that the program should not result in the closure of Third Avenue to vehicle traffic during the holiday shopping season. Since the Downtown Business Association has indicated that they are attempting to expand evening business hours, especially during peak shopping times, the nightly street closure during the height of the holiday shopping season was viewed as anti. productive to the enhancement of Downtown retail business. In addition, as a philosophical matter, the task force concluded that fencing the park and charging to walk through holiday lighting displays was not in keeping with the holiday spirit and could be viewed as a negative for the Downtown. The holiday lighting program that was ultimately developed was determined to meet the expressed goals of the City Council/Agency, the Economic Development Commission, and the Downtown Business Association as outlined below: City Council: To capture Candy Cane Lane popularity and provide the Chula Vista community with a quality holiday event. Economic Development Commission: Enhance the image of the community and the Downtown area. Downtown Business Association: Expose the Downtown business area through a promotional event and increase business activity during the holiday season and evenings. The proposed lighting program is outlined in attached "Exhibit A" and described below. Proposed Holidav Lighting Program Concept The task force attempted to develop a program that not only would provide a festive environment and holiday viewing display but also an opportunity for the Downtown merchants and the community to participate in a holiday event. These elements may be combined and implemented at one time or can be phased and implemented on a multi.year program to defer costs. J-2.. Page 3. Item ~ Meeting Date 08/04/98 The first element of the proposed program entails a lighted entry to the Downtown from "E" Street. The lighting is anticipated to be fairly intensive to make a strong identification statement and to capture the attention of vehicle traffic along "E" Street. (If the proposed entry monuments Iproposed 1998.99 CIP project] are constructed at the E Street entryway to Third Avenue, the entryway holiday lighting display will be re.evaluated for conformity with the monuments.) The E Street entry will lead to the second element of the Program which includes significant lighted displays on at least ten buildings concentrated along Third Avenue between "E" and "F" Streets. On March 17, 1998, the Downtown Business Association Board of Directors committed to working with owners and merchants in 1998 to install decorative displays on at least ten individual buildings concentrating between E and F Streets. (At this time, five continuous storefronts have made a commitment to light their buildings and decorate their windows for the 1998 holiday season: King Jewelers, Narc Clock Co., Third Avenue Antiques, Roy's Jewelry and Loan, and Jon's Wide Shoe/lrving's Stride Rite. (Letters of commitment are attached as Exhibit B.) Two adjacent stores, Cesy's Children's Boutique and Pioneer Furniture, also are considering a commitment. In 1999, the DBA agrees to target additional concentration areas. Future enlistment of ten buildings per year is planned to incrementally achieve full participation by DBA members. Currently during the holiday season, non.lighted decorations are installed on the City.owned street lamp standards. The lighting program proposes an upgraded electrical system to increase amperage that will accommodate decorative lighting on the street lamps (both cobra. head safety lamps and decorative street lamps). In addition to display lighting on street lamps, it is proposed to add holiday banners to follow through on the Downtown banner program. Lighting and banners on street lamps along Third Avenue and "F" Street and those located in public parking lots are included in this portion of the program. The Program also entails a lighting and activity program for Memorial Park and the Memorial Park Bowl. A major lighting display is proposed at the fountain area. For example, the display could include two 8 ft. lighted tin solders standing guard at a lighted archway into the park with a lighted holiday tree over the fountain that would lead the way to Santa's Workshop. The workshop would be provided by the DBA and would be a portable facade on the DBA office area or a large metal storage shed set. up nearby and painted as Santa's Workshop. "Have your picture taken with Santa" would be provided on Saturdays, Sundays, and weeknights and DBA provided vendors would sell soft drinks, hot pretzels etc. This is expected to be a revenue generator for the Association and a draw to the Downtown commercial area. Events such as a community carol sing, community group holiday production, a holiday concert etc. are envisioned for the Memorial Bowl. It is anticipated that sponsorships could be solicited from community operated businesses to produce and support these events which would be planned and coordinated by the DBA. These productions not only will have the potential to attract large numbers of people to the Downtown within the festive, holiday atmosphere but will provide an opportunity for the community at large to participate in the holiday event. Expansion of the program to include the Third Avenue median (following installation of two new street lamps) and street lamps along Parkway in future years is proposed. Cost estimates for Parkway would entail new light standards due to the age and state of the older street lamps as well as decorations. J-~ Page 4. Item ..3 Meeting Date 08104/98 Cost Estimates The cost to the City/Agency for the Downtown Holiday Lighting Program is estimated at $140,000 which would include the E Street entryways, Third Avenue/F Street and parking lot street lamps and banners, upgraded electrical circuits, and Memorial Park displays (staff and advertising costs are not included in the estimate). Future additions to include installation of holiday lighting and banners on the proposed Third Avenue median and Parkway street lamps would cost about $6,000. The cost for the future additions does not include the two separate capital improvement projects to install the actual street lamps which are estimated at $45,000 for new street lamps in the Third Avenue Median and $21,000 to $26,000 to replace street lamps on Memorial Park. Alternatives Alternative ideas that were explored included pay.per.view exhibits in Memorial Park with leased, purchased, donated, or sponsored displays and pay.per.view displays on Third Avenue. Installation of exhibits throughout Memorial Park was deemed infeasible primarily because expenses related to security and management (including labor, fencing, insurance, advertising, electric generators, etc.) were prohibitive at approximately $60,000 to $80,000 for a four week period. The other alternative involved the closure of Third Avenue to through traffic during the holiday season. The merchants, particularly the restaurant owners, were very concerned about the possible closure of the Avenue in the evenings for a three to four week period of time. Status of Candy Cane Lane In 1997, residents of Guava Avenue (Candy Cane lane) notified the City that the residents as a collective group were discontinuing outdoor holiday lighting displays for future holiday seasons. Agency staff contacted Mr. Mike Cadge, the Candy Cane Lane block captain, and discussed the potential to revive the holiday lighting tradition on Guava Avenue. Mr. Cadge indicated that neighborhood residents met last June to discuss re.initiating Candy Cane lane lighting for the 1998 holiday season. They voted not to decorate as a collective group again this year; however, the neighbors agreed to meet again in October or November and revisit the idea when it gets closer to the holidays. The Downtown Business Association would like to coordinate their lighting program with the tradition of Candy Cane Lane. The Association believes that the combined holiday lighting programs can only enhance good public relations in the City during the holidays and will attract an increased number of people from around the County to the City of Chula Vista to enjoy local restaurants and shopping opportunities during the holiday season. Staff will continue to coordinate with Candy Cane lane as this project proceeds in an effort to have both programs available for the holiday season. This process could include the assistance of City services or funds if requested by the residents. Fine Arts Policy The Fine Arts Fund has been recommended as the source of funding for the Downtown Holiday Lighting Program. (The City Council/Redevelopment Agency approved a FY 1998.99 Capital Improvement Program budget of $140,000 from the Fine Arts Fund for this project) The Town Centre I Design Manual and the Town Centre Fine Arts Policy set forth a criteria for "fine art". It is unclear if the proposed Downtown Holiday Lighting Program can be included within the "fine arts" criteria as currently set forth in those documents; therefore, the ..,¡ - c/ Page 5, Item ~ Meeting Date 08104/98 Attorney's office advises that an amendment to the Fine Arts Policy be made to allow the proposed program to be included in the criteria and policy prior to the expenditure of Fine Arts funds. Amendment to the policy will require review by the Town Centre Project Area Committee, the Design Review Committee, the Planning Commission, and the Redevelopment Agency. Recommended Action Staff is recommending that the Council/Agency approve the proposed Downtown Holiday Lighting Program concept and direct staff to prepare a detailed implementation plan to be submitted for Agency/Council consideration. The detailed implementation plan will consist of specific lighting display designs. recommended locations for placement of displays. costs for the complete lighting program. and a schedule for installation of displays and associated electrical work including a multi-year phasing plan if appropriate. The amendment to the Fine Arts Policy also will be submitted to the Agency with the recommended detailed implementation plan, FISCAL IMPACT: Funding for the Downtown Holiday Lighting Program is proposed to include Fine Arts funds for the City's portion of the program which includes Third AvenuelF Street and parking lot street lamp lighting and banners, "E" Street entryway lighting, and Memorial Park displays. Individual building displays will be contributed by Downtown property owners and merchants; Santa's workshop and vendors will be financed by the Downtown Business Association; and Memorial Bowl activities are planned to be funded by community and business sponsorships. A preliminary FY 98199 capital improvement program budget request for $140,000 from the Fine Arts Fund was approved for the Downtown Holiday Lighting Program (RO.228). The request was based on a preliminary concept and may need to be revised as staff proceeds with the project implementation plan and more refined estimates are determined. Additionally, the Fine Arts Fund will not be utilized for this purpose until staff returns with the appropriate policy amendment as recommended by the City Attorney's office. The current budget for 1998 is estimated to be $140,000 and reflects the following items: ELEMENTS OF THE PROPOSED DOWNTOWN HOLIDAY LIGHTING PROGRAM "E" STREET ENTRYWAY PHASE I $6,000 COMMERCIAL BUILDING LIGHTING DISPLAY No cost to the City THIRO AVENUE STREET LAMPS Banners $8,000 48.000 Third Avenue & "F" Street Lighting $10,000 Electrical Circuit Upgrade 30,000 PUBLIC PARKING LOTS Banners $10,000 60,000 Lights 50,000 MEMORIAL PARK PROGRAM Display at fountain $26,000 26.000 Santa's Workshop No Cost to the City Memorial Bowl Events No Cost to the City COST ESTIMATE FOR ALL ELEMENTS $140,000 J-S" Page 6, Item ..3 Meeting Date 08104198 Funds are available in the Fine Arts Fund for the proposed 1998 program; however, the current year program can be phased over several years to defer implementation costs. Ongoing costs would include annual installation and maintenance costs which is estimated to be approximately $4,000. The Downtown Business Association Board of Directors voted to include the installation/maintenance costs in their annual budget. Future years' costs would depend on the extent of improvements approved for installation. The following displays are envisioned for future years: ADDITIONAL ELEMENTS FOR FUTURE YEARS THIRD AVENUE MEDIAN Banners $600 2,600 Lights 2,000 PARKWAY STREET LAMPS Banners $2,000 6,000 Lights 4,000 Funding from the Fine Arts fund is recommended for the future years street lamp lighting and banners in the Third Avenue median and along Parkway adjacent to Memorial Park. (PB) H,IHOMEICOMMOEV\STAFF.RE~O7.14-9B\HOLYALTR [Julv 29,1998 111,45amJl ...3 -" AGENCY RESOLUTION NO. /~-,S' and COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. L91..M) JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE DOWNTOWN HOLIDAY LIGHTING PROGRAM CONCEPT AND DIRECTING STAFF TO DEVELOP A DETAILED PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION PLAN AND AMENDMENT TO THE TOWN CENTRE I FINE ARTS POLICY TO INCLUDE THE DOWNTOWN HOLIDAY LIGHTING PROGRAM WHEREAS, the holiday lights and displays on Candy Cane Lane have been discontinued and the City Council and Redevelopment Agency desires to capture Candy Cane Lane's popularity and provide the Chula Vista community with a quality holiday event; and WHEREAS, the City Council and Redevelopment Agency desires to explore the possibility of continuing the holiday lighting tradition on Third Avenue in the Downtown area; and WHEREAS, a task force was formed and numerous alternative holiday lighting projects and programs were evaluated and a Downtown Holiday Lighting Program was developed to meet the expressed desires of the City Council and Redevelopment Agency; and WHEREAS, the City Council and Redevelopment Agency has reviewed the proposed Downtown Holiday Lighting Program. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council and Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista does hereby: 1. Approving the proposed Downtown Holiday Lighting Program concept for the 1998 holiday season; and 2. Direct staff to develop a detailed project implementation plan and amendment to the Town Centre I Fine Arts Policy to include the Downtown Holiday Lighting Program. Presented by Approved as to form by ~~ ~~ ' Chris Salomone Director of Community Development [{POJ H,\HOMElCOMMDEV\RESOS\HOLYlIGH.RES {J"'V 24. 1995 {4,O5pm}J ~-1 -.. - EXHIBIT A DOWNTOWN HOLIDAY LIGHTING PROGRAM (TASK FORCE RECOMMENDATION) 1. E STREET ENTRYWAY . 1998 Phase I - Interim high intensity lighting until entryway monuments can be installed (City) . 2000 Phase II - Monument lighting (City) 2. THIRD AVENUE STREET LAMPS Lighting on street lamps + banners (City-CIP) (Requires street lamp electrical upgrade ($30,000)) 3. LIGHTING IN MEDIAN Lights + banners on street lamps (City-CIP) 4, LIGHTING IN PARK a) Santa's Workshop (DBA) . Semi-portable metal shed (painted as workshop) . Lock up at night . Locate at old shuffle board area . Vendors (i.e. popcorn, soda, pretzels) adjacent to workshop . Pictures with Santa on Saturdays, Sundays and weeknights b) Major exhibits at fountain (City) c) Decorate Bowl (main exhibit at fountain) d) Bowl Events to tie-in with park lighting - Friday or Thursday nights (Community based/DBNCity) . Carol sing with song books (DBA) . Community group production in Bowl ';>-8 . Living Christmas Tree . Sponsored productions (i.e. Universal Concert, etc.) . Vending booths (go thru DBA) 1 st - DBA merchants 2nd-Citywide 3rd - Other merchants outside City 5. COMMERCIAL BUILDING LIGHTING DISPLAYS Owners/Merchants displays on individual buildings (DBA) 1998 Phase 1 - Concentrate E to F for a minimum of ten (10) buildings, also work with other owners 1999 Phase 2 - Target additional concentration areas (DBA) 6, PARKWAY STREET lAMPS Lights + Banners (City) 7. PARKING - lOTS Lights + Banners (City) [h,\home\commdevlstaff.rep\O7-' 4-98\holy,ltre,,¡ .3-9 ~"' ~~~ ~"QQ ,- u" "U~Cd DH'iD EXHIBIT B !](Lng :JE.WE.[E.H gift.. fo't aft Ð,,"aÛon~ 1-2 ~ ~C¡8 27'Yz 'J¡;,.d <7!v<nu.< Chu.C" r¡I"ta, {la/V"",'", 92010 422-2711 ~~.M..t, 7~~ '5&-~- ~ ~ ¿ d- ~~~ ~~ v<--Y>-7 ~y-yz,¿- <--i; h ~ ~ 47~-, ~~;;~~L '-I~þL/- ~.~~~- .- ~~ L- -477 ~ dt~~ 07¿ ~~ cL-n.d- ~ ~~---- ~ ~ '7L~..o t!1~.~ -'I~~ .~~ ¥~ ~ m ð-nß15z. ~~ ~~ ¿~ -} ~rP~ . 'P~U/U r~ 7J1f! ~-ú- jl~ t1J:i..uJ ~~LÆUA ~ ~~ --A~~- .~ ~~~;;~~~: ~ - *~~/~ ~ 4J /.Lð-U¿tL- ..~ . e. O. V'~~--' '~ ~ t~: ~'::~<-7:' ð'7<-- àC- E;r-d 1M-- ß¿! A:4-"V h'L- cu¿ ']l:::Zt., /'" ., thLJ. ~~- ~ ~. 'B . ..ß-IO '-t.. -' ~ D'SS; _.. 1- - ~ z;~~, 1~, Post Office Box 8 ¡ 26 Huntington Beach, CA 92615-8126 800-375-XMAS (9627) 714-969-7010 714-969-9650 (FAX) roger@christmasevents.com June 4, 1998 Tom Money 355 Third Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Dear Mr. Money' Jack Blakely requested that I stop by your building at 355 Third Avenue, and develop a holiday lighting program for your consideration. After surveying the building, I recommend, as I have for four other property owners, that you place perimeter lighting across the Ace Paging/Allstate Insurance portion of the building that trOnlS on Third Avenue. I have enclosed a photo of another building with this lighting installed, so that you can see how the finished product would appear. A total of 45' of commercial grade, 16 gauge A WG wiring, would be sufficient to cover the building tront Your line would have ¡O-watt clear, 130 volt long-life lamps on 12" centers A 20' lead and weatherproof plug will be included for ease of installation. I have included the cost for a crew to install, remove and store this line. This cost includes the special plastic clips which keep each lamp perfectly stntight across your building Our light line has a ten season factory warranty, assuring you of many additional seasons of service In addition to the lighting, the placement of two 5' Sierra Pine Wreaths, one between each set of windows on the second level, would be a nice accent to the building. I have enclosed a photo of this wreath used on another building for your review. Each wreath weighs a total of 37 lbs., and is constructed tram 3/8" cold-rolled steel rod The trarrung is covered in 14" double branched Rocky Mountain Pine garlands, accented with clusters of three 2.5" red holly berries. The wreahs are illurrunated using clear lamps throughout A 3' steel-tramed, red vinyl covered bow completes the ornamentation. A six season warranty covers your wreaths in case of severe weather or defects in manufacture Pricing: 45' - Gilbert light lines as described =$ 79.15 2 - 5' Sierra Pine Wreaths, lighted and ornamented as described = 750.00 $829.15 tax 68.40 $ 897.55 Additional cost to install, remove and store these lights would be 237.75 $],128.30 J ..1 ( Your only ongoing costto re-use this program each year, would be that of the installation at $237.75' I have made a note to give you a follow-up call in the near future regarding this proposal. Please don't hesitate to contact my office in the interim should you have any questions. Sincerely, ttl t;lk'~ R er A. Harrington 0 President RAH/ss Enclosures cc: Jack Blakely J-/~ --- - ~ ..j-It./ ~Z)~~, 1~, Post OtTice Box 8126 Huntint,>ton Beach, CA 92615-8126 800-375-XivlAS (9627) 714-969-7010 714-969-9650 (FAX) rogçrgchristmase\ents. com June 4, 1998 Karen McMains 237 Elm Chula Vista, CA 91910 Dear Ms. McMains. Jack Blakely requested that 1 stop and survey your building at 279 Third Avenue, and come up with a holiday decorating program proposal for your consideration. The following proposal features both perimeter lighting and decor for the front of the Star News building, and includes the cost of installation, removal and storage All decor presented is manufactured in my California factory. The lighting has a ten (10) season warranty, and the decor has a six (6) season warranty' A total of 60' oflight lines would cover the entire building fTontage (both buildings). I have enclosed a photo of this lighting on another building for your review. We do not use boxed, 25' indoorloutdoor lights, like those purchased at K-Mart. Each line is manufactured fTom commercial grade, 16 gauge AWG dual stranded wire. Long-life, 3,000 hour, la-watt clear 130 volt lamps are placed on 12" centers Each line is terminated with a 20' lead and plug. The cost to install your lighting, includes the cost of the special plastic clips which are affixed to the parapet wall and keep each light perfectly straight on the building. Others simply charge you for these clips after the fact, when billing your installation' In addition to the perimeter lighting, we recommend centering a 5' Sierra Pine Wreath on the building. with a double draping of 14" Rocky Mountain Pine garlands cascading fTom each side of your wreath. I have enclosed a photo of a like decor for your review, although your garland drapes will be more dramatic with each drape consisting of 15' - 16' of garland to go either 12' or 13' with a 4' garland drop. One building measures 26', while the other measures 24' Your 5' Sierra Pine Wreath weighs 37Ibs., and is constructed fTom new 3/8" cold-rolled steel rod. The fTame is covered in luxurious 14" double-branched Rocky Mountain Pine garlands, ornamented with clusters of three 2.5" red holly berries. A 3' steel.fTamed, red vinyl covered bow completes the ornamentation on your wreath, which will be illuminated with clear lights throughout. A total of 62' of 14" Rocky Mountain Pine garlands will be used for the double drapes across each building. The garland will be lighted and ornamented the same as your wreath. J -IS- Pricing: 60' - Gilbert light lines as described = $ 95.15 I - 5' Sierra Pine Wreath, lighted and ornamented as described = 375.00 62' - 14/4-2 Rocky Mountain Pine garlands, lighted and oruamented as described = 512.50 $ 982.65 tax ...ÆJ)l $],06372 Additional cost to install, remove and store this entire program would be 249.70 $],313.42 As this is a purchase proposal, your only ongoing cost to re-use this dècor each year, would be the $249.70 installation costl I have made a note to give you a follow-up call regarding this proposal in the near future. Please don't hesitate to call my office in the interim should you have any questions. Sincerely, RZ H:~n:::U ~ President RAH/ss enclosures .j -I ~ --- - I- ~. ...3-11 ~ --~:~.'_"'/."""""""",.....",.,.., .".:~; ,O' . ., : ,"ô!iJ' ': ,"j -- ...~..'" - i "..,"'<1'.111[-" .. P;'~'JI '2'; Ii"" ,.".. ;-"'¡ '-"'rIÞ-II~"'I' " 1. . 'x. - ~-I,t~III' 'IM~~;¡)"!; ,-""'- ~~r\'~'!I.í ~~ ;~":í' -- '- . ';?t~ 'D~~, 11eC:, Post Office Box 8126 Huntington Beach, CA 92615-8126 800-375-XMAS (9627) 714-969-7010714-969-9650 (FAX) roger@christmase\ents.com June 3, 1998 King Jewelers Attention: Dave Rossi 271 1/2 Third Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Dear Mr. Rossi: Thank you for taking the time to discuss your holiday decorating needs recently The following is a holiday decorating proposal for the buildings located at #271 1/2, #271, and #269 Third Avenue. All three buildings will be illuminated along the ITont parapet wall with clear lights My factory will manufacture each line ITom commercial grade, 16 gauge A WG wire Lines will be made to fit each building, and have a 20' lead with weatherproof plug for ease of installation and safety. We use only IO-watt clear, 130 volt, 3,000 hour long-life lamps, placed on 12" centers. Cost includes the special clear plastic clips which are affixed to the building and keep each light perfectly straight I have included a photo of this lighting installed elsewhere for your review Note: We are the only company which provides commercial grade lines All others use cheap boxed light sets with indoorloutdoor wire, and throw the excess light line on the rool1 Also, we include the cost of the clips in ourinstallation price. Others bill you for these extra costs after the fact' In addition to the clear lighting, we recommend centering a 5' Sierra Pine Wreath on both the #269 and #271 building ITonts Each wreath is covered in luxurious Rocky Mountain Pine garlands, and illuminated throughout with clear lamps. Ornamentation includes clusters of three, 2.5" red holly berries and a 3' steeI-ITamed, red vinyl covered bow. Each wreath is manufactured using new 3/8" cold-rolled steel rod, and features our six season factory warranty against heavy weather and defects in manufacture' Each wreath weighs 37 lbs. On the #269 building, a 14' length of 14" double-branched Rocky Mountain Pine garlands will be draped from each side of your wreath. Each 10' span will have a 4' deep drape. Garlands will also be illuminated with clear lights and ornamented with red holly berry clusters. I have enclosed a photo of a like application for your review. ~ ./' -.. - FnclIIg: 55' - Gilbert light lines as described =$ 95.15 2 - 5' Sierra Pine Wreaths lighted and ornamented as described @ $375.00 = 750.00 28' - 14/4-2 Rocky Mountain Pine garlands lighted and ornamented as described = 245.00 $],090,]5 tax 8994 $1,18009 Additional cost to install, remove and store entire program 282.05 $1,462.14 After this year, your only ongoing cost to reinstall this program would the $282.05 installation cost' I have made a note to follow-up with you in the near future regarding this decorating proposaL Please don't hesitate to contact my office in the interim should you have any questions Sincerely, R~: H:n~ ic President RAH/ss enclosures J-.)JJ --- - -- '-' ~~ . ¡ r . - ==~< ' -""'-"-...",.,.,"'."'-- . ~.-.~ -¡;¡¡;;. ---<~. ';"""'""-'" -:;::::::::-- - ,. . - ...~..'" c,.~ . }i!r~'iii ;~i lip :~il ~-- -..- ,. - ,--::;-"_.,, ~'~.~ --.- ',.,-- ---- t ~ J -,,2~ ~7)~~, 1~, Post Ofiìce Box 8] 26 Huntington Beach, CA 92615-8126 800-375-XMAS (9627) 714-969-7010 714-969-9650 (FAX) roger@christmasevents.com June 4, ] 998 Eddie Chapman 317 Third Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Dear Mr. Chapman: Jack Blakely requested that I stop by your building at 3] 7 Third Avenue, and develop a holiday lighting program for your consideration After surveying the building, I find there is very little I can do, as the neon signage leaves no area for me to decorate! The only thing that I might recommend, as I have for four other property owners, is to outline the building frontage with perimeter lighting. I have enclosed a photo of another building with this lighting instaIIed, so that you can see how the finished product would appear. A total of25' of commercial grade, 16 gauge AWG wiring, would be sufficient to cover the building front. Your line would have 10-watt clear, 130 volt long-life lamps on 12" centers. A 20' lead and weatherproof plug will be included for ease ofinstaIIation. I have included the cost for a crew to instaII, remove and store this line. This cost includes the special plastic clips which keep each lamp perfectly straight across your building. Pricing: 25' - Gilbert light lines as described ~$47l5 tax ....J.M $5104 Additional cost to install, remove and store these lights would be 33.75 $84.79 The cost to re-install these lights each year would be otùy $33.75, and with a ten year factory wßITanty, you can be assured of many additional seasons of service from your light line! I have made a note to follow-up with you in the near future regarding this proposal. Please don't hesitate to contact my office in the interim should you have any questions. Sincerely, :Ø:: A :m~b k President J . -'.3 --- :è j~~ì;~~~n$~ '\~-~.?:"~ , .~'.!.{;-~ ,~-,; }:! -.