The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutRDA Packet 2000/07/11 ~{ft.. -f!- - ..;;::: CIlY OF CHULA VISTA TUDDAY, JULY ", 2000 COUNCIL CHAMB." 6:00 P.M. PUBLIC SIRVlCD BUILDING (I_EDIATELY fOLLOWING THE CITY COUNCIL MiniNG) ADJOURNED MEETING OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL Agency Members Davis, Moot, Padilla, Salas, and Chair Horton CONSENT ITEMS (Item 1) The staff recommendations regarding the fallowing item(s) listed under the Consent Calendar will be enacted by the Agency by one motion without discussion unless an Agency member, a member of the public or City staff requests that the item be pulled for discussion. If you wish to speak an one of these items, please fill aut a "Request to Speak Farm" available in the lobby and submit it to the Secretary of the Redevelopment Agency or the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be discussed after Action Items. Items pulled by the public will be the first items of business. 1. AGENCY APPROVING THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE FORMER SDG&E SERVICE RESOLUTION CENTER INTO THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA'S PRIMARY PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS FACILITY AND CORPORATION YARD BY EXPANDING/ REMODELING EXISTING STRUCTURES AND CONSTRUCTING A NEW MAINTENANCE BUILDING; AND ADOPTING NEGATIVE DECLARATION IS-00-52 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY'S PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS FACILITY AND CORPORATION YARD LOCATED AT 1800 MAXWELL ROAD, WITHIN THE OTAY VALLEY ROAD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA-The existing Public Works facility consists of six acres and is located on Woodlawn, just north of F Street. The facility is not large enough to accommodate the expanding Public Works Operations. The City purchased the SDG&E service center located at 1800 Maxwell Road in March 1999. The property is 25 acres and has several existing structures, including a 31,000 sq. ft. administration building. Public works Operations requires all the existing space and more. The facility requires expansion and new construction to fully accommodate the expanding services to meet the demands of the growing City. (Community Development Director) Staff Recommendation: Agency adopt the resolution. - AGINDA -2- JULY ", 2000 ORAL COMMUNICATIONS This is an opportunity for the general public to address the Redevelopment Agency on any subject matter within the Agency's jurisdiction that is not an item an this agenda. (State law, however, generally prohibits the Redevelopment Agency from taking action on any issues not included an the pasted agenda.) If you wish to address the Agency an such a subject, please complete the "Request to Speak Under Oral Communications Form" available in the lobby and submit it to the Secretary to the Redevelopment Agency or City Clerk prior to the meeting. Those who wish to speak, please give your name and address for record purposes and fallow up action. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES The fallowing items have been advertised and/or pasted as public hearings as required by law. If you wish to speak to any item, please fill aut the "Request to Speak Farm" available in the lobby and submit it to the Redevelopment Agency or the City Clerk prior to the meeting. 2. PUBLIC CONSIDERATION OF GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR THE HEARING DEVELOPMENT OF A GAS STATION WITH ASSOCIATED FAST FOOD RESTAURANT, CAR WASH, AND FOOD MART LOCATED AT 3733 MAIN STREET WITHIN THE SOUTHWEST REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA- Worldwide Petroleum Company is proposing to develop the vacant parcel at the southeast corner of Main and Mace Streets with a service station, car wash, convenience store and fast food establishment. A variety of landscape moterials will be installed throughout the site and all missing street improvements around the facility will be installed as part of the project. [Community Development Director] a. AGENCY GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SUP-00-05, TO WORLDWIDE RESOLUTION PETROLEUM COMPANY TO CONSTRUCT A GAS STATION WITH ASSOCIATED FAST FOOD RESTAURANT, CAR WASH, AND FOOD MART LOCATED AT 3733 MAIN STREET b. AGENCY ADOPTING NEGATIVE DECLARATION IS 00-14 AND APPROVING AN RESOLUTION OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT WITH WORLDWIDE PETROLEUM COMPANY FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A GAS STATION WITH ASSOCIATED FAST FOOD RESTAURANT, CAR WASH, AND FOOD MART LOCATED AT 3733 MAIN STREET, WITHIN THE SOUTHWEST REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Agency adopt the resolutions. OTHER BUSINESS 3. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS) 4. CHAIR'S REPORT(S) 5. AGENCY COMMENTS - .. AGENDA .3. JULY 11,2000 ADJOURNMENT The meeting will adiourn to a Closed Session and thence to a regular meeting of Redevelopment Agency on July 18, 2000 at 6:00 p.m., immediately following the City Council meeting, in the City Council Chambers. CLOSED SESSION Unless Agency Counsel, the Executive Director, or the Redevelopment Agency states othervvise at this time, the Agency will discuss and deliberate on the following item(s) of business which are permiHed by law to be the subject of a closed session discussion, and which the Agency is advised should be discussed in closed session to best protect the interests of the City. The Agency is required by law to return to open session, issue any reports of final action taken in closed session, and the votes taken. However, due to the typical length of time taken up by closed sessions, the videotaping will be terminated at this point in order to save costs so that the Agency's return from closed session, reparts of final action taken, and adjournment will not be videotaped. Nevertheless, the report of final action taken will be recorded in the minutes which will be available in the Office of the Secretary to the Redevelopment Agency and the City Clerk's Office. 6. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING EXISTING LITIGATION -- Pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a) a. Agency vs. Shinohara [Case No. GISO02460] - - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA STATEMENT ITEM NO.: I MEETING DATE: 07 III /00 ITEM TITLE: AGENCY RESOLUTION APPROVING THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE FORMER SDG&E SERVICE CENTER INTO THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA'S PRIMARY PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS FACILITY AND CORPORATION YARD BY EXPANDING/REMODELING EXISTING STRUCTURES AND CONSTRUCTING A NEW MAINTENANCE BUILDING; AND ADOPTING NEGATIVE DECLARATION IS-00-52 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY'S PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS FACILITY AND CORPORATION YARD LOCATED AT 1800 MAXWELL ROAD, WITHIN THE OTAY VALLEY ROAD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA SUBMITTED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR t.C;, REVIEWED BY: EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR & f í)(V' 4/5THS VOTE: YESD NO0 BACKGROUND The City of Chula Vista has recognized a need for a new Public Works facility and Corporation Yard for many years. The existing Public Works facility consists of six acres and is located on Woodlawn, just north of F Street. The facility is not large enough to accommodate the expanding Public Works Operations. The City purchased the SDG&E Service center located at 1800 Maxwell Road in March 1999. The property is 25 acres and has several existing structures, including a 31,000 square foot administration building. Public Works Operations requires all the existing space and more. The facility requires expansion and new construction to fully accommodate the expanding services to meet the demands of the growing City. The proposed improvements include a 10,415 square foot addition to the administration building and a 14,195 square foot addition to the shop building; and the new construction of a 46,540 square foot maintenance building, a 5,370 square foot wash building and a 1,312 square foot fuel facility (see Exhibit 1). The use is allowed by right under the General Plan, Otay Valley Road Implementation Plan, and Zoning Ordinance. However, design review is required, as well as Redevelopment Agency approval. The City's Planning Department reviewed the proposed project pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Ad and determined that it would have no significant impacts and recommended adoption of Negative Declaration IS-00.52 (see Exhibit 2). /- / - - PAGE 2, ITEM NO.: I MEETING DATE: 07/11/00 RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency approving the development of the project, and adopting the Negative Declaration. BOARDSICOMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION The Design Review Committee reviewed the proposed proiect at its meeting of June 26,200. At that meeting, Committee members stated that the project was well designed and would be an asset to the area in which it will be located. The DRC recommended approval of the project, as presented, to the Redevelopment Agency. See Exhibit 3 for the DRC report and conditions of approval. DISCUSSION Site Characteristics The project site is located at 1800 Maxwell Road in the Otay Valley Road Redevelopment Project Area. The property is zoned light industrial, per the Otay Valley Road Implementation Plan, and is approximately 25 acres. The site had been developed for the SDG&E South Service Center. There are three buildings on the site totaling approximately 54,000 feet. Surrounding uses include industrial development and the County Landfill. Proposed Proiect The project involves the redevelopment and expansion of the existing SDG&E South Service Center, in order to accommodate the City's Public Works facility and Corporation Yard. The project consists of expansion of the existing administration building and shops building, and new construction of a maintenance building, wash building and fuel facility. The project plans call for the addition of 10,415 square feet of new floor area to the existing administration building. The floor area would be added at the northwestern and southern portions of the existing 31,040 square foot structure. The addition would result in the structure being setback approximately 10 feet from Maxwell Road, a variance will be required for this encroachment through the Planning and Building Department (the required setback is 25 feet). A new 46,540 square foot maintenance facility will be constructed on the west side of the property. The facility will accommodate vehicle repair and maintenance for City vehicles and transit buses. In addition, the existing 14,195 square foot shop building will be expanded to 16,800 square feet; and a new 5,370 square foot wash building and 1,313 square foot fuel island will be constructed. /-:L. - ~ PAGE 3, ITEM NO.: I MEETING DATE: 07/11/00 Land Use and Zonina Desianations The General Plan land Use Designation for the subject site and the surrounding properties is General Industrial; the zoning, per the Otay Valley Road Redevelopment Plan is limited Industrial (IL). The use is allowed, however Design Review and Redevelopment Agency approval is required for the expansion and new construction. The proposed expansion/redevelopment meets all development standards in the Otay Valley Road Implementation Plan, with the exception of the front yard setback. The Otay Valley Road Implementation Plan requires a 25 foot setback. A variance will be required prior to the issuance of the building permit. The encroachment should not adversely impact the streetscape due to the sloping topography and placement of screening vegetation. Site Plan and Parkina Vehicular access to the site would be taken via two existing driveways located on Maxwell Road. Existing roadways and parking areas on the property would be utilized for the Public Works facility. A new guest parking area would be created adjacent to the administrative building. A total of 550 parking spaces would be provided on the site, 257 of which will be available to City staff. The remaining spaces would be utilized for storage of City vehicles. The Planning Department has determined that the project meets City off-street parking requirements, and City Parking lot standards. Landscapina The proposed landscape plan calls for the placement of Brisbane Box trees along the southern and eastern boundaries of the property. Eucalyptus trees are prosposed on the northern slope of the property. Most of the existing landscape will be replaced with new material. The plan was created in conjunction with the City landscaping staff and is in conformance with the City Landscape Manual. Architecture The project is well designed. The proposed improvements are compatible with the existing structures and greatly enhance the existing facility. The architectural styling is attractive and provides a contemporary look to the facility that was built in the 1980's. Building materials consists of concrete block and corrugated metal. Emphasis has been given to the Administration Building in the form of a metal entryway structure and significant landscaping. The building elevations, as seen in Exhibit 1, depict a high quality design. Conditions of Approval The Planning and Building Department and Engineering Department have conditions of approval which are attached (see Exhibit 3). they include: I-..!J - - PAGE 4, ITEM NO.: I MEETING DATE: 07/11/00 0 Construct the project as submitted; 0 Comply with all requirements of the Building Division; 0 Apply graffiHi resistant treatment to wall and building surfaces; and 0 Process grading plans and obtain a grading permit. CONCLUSION The proposed project is consistent with the goals of the Otay Valley Road Redevelopment Area, and complies with City land use policies. The facility should have minimal impact on the surrounding land uses. The use of the facility by the City is merely a resumption of its prior operation. The expansion is necessary to accommodate the needs of the growing community. Staff believes that the planned improvements will result in a high quality industrial development that will greatly benefit the City and recommends approval of the project and adoption of the Negative Declaration. FISCAL IMPACT The proposed improvements and expansion to the facility at 1800 Maxwell Road is estimated to be between $22 million and $25 million. This action does not have a fiscal impact. ATTACHMENTS 1. Project Plans 2. Negative Declaration IS-00-52 3. Design Review Committee Report for 6/26/2000 with Conditions of Approval Ho\HOME\COMMDEV\STAFF.REP\O7.11-00\Corpymd.doc 1-4 - - RESOLUTION - RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE FORMER SDG&E SERVICE CENTER INTO THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA'S PRIMARY PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS FACILITY AND CORPORATION YARD BY EXPANDING/REMODELING EXISTING STRUCTURES AND CONSTRUCTING A NEW MAINTENANCE BUILDING; AND ADOPTING NEGATIVE DECLARATION IS- 00-52 FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE CITY'S PUBLIC WORKS OPERATIONS FACILITY AND CORPORATION YARD LOCATED AT 1800 MAXWELL ROAD, WITHIN THE OTAY VALLEY ROAD REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista has presented development plans for the redevelopment and new construction af the City's new corparatian yard at 1800 Maxwell Road ["Praject"]; and WHEREAS, the site for the prapased Project is lacated at 1800 Maxwell Raad on a 25 acre parcel within the Otay Valley Raad Redevelapment Praject Area under the jurisdiction and cantrol of the Redevelapment Agency of the City of Chula Vista; and, WHEREAS, the City's Cammunity Development Department Planning and Environmental Manager reviewed the proposed Praject and issued Negative Declaratian IS-00-52 far the project in accardance with CEQA; and, WHEREAS, after a public hearing, the Design Review Committee reviewed and recammended that the Redevelapment Agency apprave the proposed Project subject to the conditions listed in Exhibit B hereof. NOW, THEREFORE, THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA does hereby find, order, determine and resolve as fallows: 1. The proposed project will nat have a significant impact on the environment; accardingly Negative declaratian IS-00-52 was prepared and is hereby adapted in accardance with CEQA. 2. The prapased project is allowed under the General Plan and is cansistent with the Otay Valley Road Redevelopment Plan and shall implement the purpose thereof; the praject shall assist with the eliminatian of blight in the Project Area. 3. The Redevelapment Agency of the City af Chula Vista hereby approves the develapment of the farmer SDG&E service center inta the City af Chula Vista's primary public works aperatians facility and corporation yard in the form presented in accardance with plans attached thereto as Exhibit A and subject ta canditians listed in Exhibits B. Presented by: Appraved as ta form by: ~, ~~ Chris Salamone Cammunity Development Director H:\HOME\COMMDEVlRESOS\Corp Yard. DOC I-ta- - ~ --- ~- , ~, :' .;- . - - - 'i!¿ i j,,'i j: j I I 1- (. -~-. _.~.._-- -.. ._-- - EXHIBIT B CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Planning and Building Department Conditions: 1. Prior to occupancy of the new structure, all landscaping and hardscape improvements shall be installed in accordance with the approved landscape plan and the comments of the City Landscape Planner. 2. Construct the project as submitted, unless othemise modified herein. 3. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall comply with all requirements af the Building Division. a. Submit architectural plans that are stamped and signed by a licensed architect. b. Structural plans and calculatians must be stamped and signed by a Califamia Registered Civil/Structural Engineer. c. Project shall comply with 1997 UBC and 1996 NEC. d. Project shall comply with 1998 handicapped accessibility requirements. e. Plans shall indicate type of occupancy. 4. A graffiti resistant treatment shall be specified for all wall and building surfaces. This shall be noted for any building and wall plans and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. Additionally, the project shall conform with Sections 9.20.055 and 9.20.035 of the CVMC regarding graffiti control. 5. The manument sign to be located at the entrance to the site shall conform with applicable setback and area regulations. Prior to the placement of signs on site, a sign permit shall be obtained. 6. Prior to the issuance of building permits the applicant shall obtain a variance from the front yard setback requirements of Otay Valley Road Redevelopment Area. Engineering Department Conditions: 7. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall process grading plans for the site and obtain a grading permit. 8. The project plans shall depict a vehicle maintenance area. 9. The applicant shall consolidate the nine existing parcels into one parcel. /- 7 - "T Fire Department Conditions: 10. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, all new water supply piping for fire hydrants of fire suppression systems to be tested by Fire Department. II. Prior to the issuance of a building pennit, the Fire Department shall review and approve plans for the automatic fire suppression system. 12. Plans shall specify that fire sprinkler building with more than 100 heads shall be monitored by a central station. 13. Prior to the issuance of building pennits, the applicant shall submit plans and State Fire Marshal Listings for fire alann system components. 14. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, fire extinguishers shall be placed in all buildings. Placement and number of fire extinguishers shall be subject to the approval of the Fire Department. Police Department Conditions: 15. The applicant shall comply with all recommendatians of the City of Chula Vista Crime Prevention Unit as shown in Attachment "A." Attachment "A" - Department comments H: HOME :lplann ;ng/stevex pi drcOO6 5 1- f( - "T . ... , II /_10 - . "T - "T I-I::J- - - - ~ ATTACHMENT 2 Negative Declaration PROJECT NAME: City of Chula Vista Public Works Operatians & Corparation Yard PROJECT LOCATION: 1800 Maxwell Raad PROJECT APPLICANT: City of Chula Vista CASE NO: 1S-00-52 DATE: June 9, 2000 A. Proiect Settin~ The site consists af an approximately 25-acre lot located at 1800 Maxwell Road in the City ofChula Vista (Figure I). The area is generally located in the Otay River Valley, north afMain Street, west of Maxwell Drive, and east of Interstate 805. The project site is currently develaped with three buildings and paved parking areas. The existing improvements are associated with the previous use of the site as the San Diego Gas & Electric (SDG&E) South Bay Service Center, A large administrative building is located in the southeast comer, a maintenance building is in the central portion and a third Structure is in the north central portion of the site. The western portian of the lot was previously used as the SDG&E storage yard. The improved portion of the site slopes naturally to the southern property line. From the northern boundary of the improved portian of the site a natural slape ascends to the property line. Fill slopes descend ftom the west and south property lines approximately 25 feet at a 2: I ratio. The slopes are covered with scattered grasses and brush. The lat is bounded by Maxwell Road ta the east, developed industrial parcels to the south, vacant industrial parcels (fanner animal rendering plant) to the west, and a vacant hillside and the Otay Landfill to the north. Access to the site is via Main Street to Maxwell Road. B. Project Description Discretionary permits associated with the existing facilities were granted in 1986 under Precise Plan 86-3 (p.86-3). A negative declaration was adopted by the Redevelopment Agency (1S-86-19). Discretionary pennits associated with the proposed project include Design Review and Redevelopment Agency approval. The City of Chula Vista recently purchased the fonner South Bay Service Center ftom SDG&E. The SDG&E Service Center included an equipment storage yard; truck parking areas; an 8,100 square foot maintenance building; a 14,000 square foot warehouse; and a 25,000 square foat administration building with related off-street parking. The City proposes to improve the existing facility and relacate the Public Works Operations and I 1-/4 - - Corporation Yard, including Chula Vista Transit operations, currently located at 707 F Street to the subject site. The majarity of the proposed improvement would be located on the existing paved portion of the lot. Several retaining walls will be constructed along the northern natural slope to provide additional building pads. Proposed improvements consists of: 1) adding approximately 10,415 square feet to the existing administration building to provide additional office space; 2) renovating the existing warehause and adding approximately 16,975 square feet for "shops" operations; 3) adding a 5,370 square foot wash building north of the existing warehouse; and 4) adding a 46,540 square foot automotive maintenance building at the northwest portion of the lot. The proposal alsa includes a fueling facility for City vehicles and buses; a campressed natural gas (CNG) fueling facility for City and public use; and a Regional Household Hazardous Waste callection facility for "Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators" and residents of Chula Vista, Coronada, Imperial Beach, and National City. These proposed uses are discussed in mare detail below. Public Works & Corporation Yard The proposed Public Warks Operations and Corporation Yard facility would house the Public Works Department's Administrative offices and the Sewer, Streets, Traffic, Vehicle Maintenance, and Building Maintenance functions. Additionally, other City functions such as Engineering and Building Inspection (Canstruction Inspectian, Surveys, Parks Maintenance, and Central Stores) will be relocated to the new facility. An estimated 306 City employees are anticipated. Vehicle maintenance will be conducted in the proposed maintenance building. No vehicle maintenance will be conducted outdoors. City vehicles will use the proposed on- site fueling facilities. Compressed Natural Gas Fueling Facility The facility is located at the secondary entrance and is fenced off from the remainder of the site with an existing security gate. The CNG facility will be utilized for City vehicles and by any member of the public with a credit card. The facility includes ane fuel pump. It is estimated that approximately 50 non-city vehicles will utilize the CNG facility. Chula Vista Transit Chula Vista Transit currently operates 33 public buses from its current location. By this November 6 buses will be added to the existing fleet. The City anticipates adding 16 buses over the next five years, for a maximum of 55 buses. Approximately 169 transit employees are anticipated. All new and replacement buses will be CNG buses. The City is in the process of acquiring a contiguous 7.acre property to the west of said site to accommodate the expanded fleet of buses. Buses will depart from the site 5:00 AM and return '\t II :30 PM. Maintenance of the buses will occur during the non-operating hours in the proposed maintenance building. 2 /-/~ - - Regional Household Hazardous Waste (RHHW) The RHHW facility will be located in the northwest portion of the site. Access will be via the secondary entrance to the site along the narthern internal driveway. The entire area will be fenced off. Signage notifYing and discauraging persons ftom dropping materials off after hours will be pasted in the immediate vicinity. The facility will also be equipped with security camera(s) to record any improper disposal. The facility will have a trailer affice/education building to house employees. The packing and storage area will have two l6'xI0' modular double wall storage lockers and at least one 8'x8' storage lacker. Each of the storage lockers is rated far two hours with containment/sump areas in the floor. Each of the large lackers has an interior wall that divides the container into two separate compartments and shelves on the exterior walls. The locker will be used far low grade and nan-flammable materials. The secand locker has an autamatic chemical suppression system designed to hold items that should be isolated and items that are typically stored outside at similar facilities. The facility will also have at least one above ground storage tank for used oil and filter collection. The facility will be designed and pennitted to accept hazardous waste ftom residents and "Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators." The amount of material a resident can transport is limited by the CA Department of Transportation to approximately 150 lbs. per vehicle. The facility will be open on Saturdays ftom 10:00 AM to 3:00 PM. Hours may be expanded ftom 9:00 AM to 5:00 PM if demand requires. Depending on demand the facility may be open one or two weekdays per month or quarter to service the overflow of residents such as Wednesday and Friday aftemaons from about 2:00 to 6:00 PM. Participation on weekdays will be limited to appointment only Approximately 90% af the material dropped afby the public will be latex paint and used motar oil. Both are declassified materials and not cansidered hazardaus for the purposes afhousehold hazardous waste collection. The remaining materials to be collected at the facility will include hypodennic needles, solvents, oil based architectural coatings, fluorescent light tubes, dry batteries, partially full aerosol cans, etc. (list on file in the Planning Division). The facility will not treat or dispose afhousehald hazardaus waste on-site. Some materials will be combined into a comman container. The intent is to reduce bulk and the amount of required packaging without effecting the potential reuse or recycling of the material. The materials will be categorized, bulked, packed and shipped by licensed contractor. Container trucks will transport materials ftom the site as ftequentIy as 90-120 days. State law requires the removal of materials at least annually. A contractor licensed by the State Department of Toxic Substance control and the County Department ofEnviranmental Health will do the callection, packing and transportation of materials. Materials will be removed approximately every 90 to 120 days. Household hazardous waste will be removed approximately ever 80 to 90 days in small moving van or large commercial truck. A medical waste vehicle will haul away small amounts of medical waste every 75 to 90 days. 3 /-1' - - C. Compatibility with Zonin¡¡ General Plan and Sectional P]annin¡¡ Area Plan The proposed use is permitted under the current Zoning and General Plan designations. The subject property is zoned IP- General Industrial ZonelPrecise Plan and designated IL-Light Industrial on the City's General Plan. The project is also located in Otay Valley Road Redevelopment Area and conforms to the development regulations. No mitigation is required. D. Identification of Environmental Effects An Initial Study canducted by the City af Chula Vista (including an attached Environmental Checklist form) determined that the proposed project will nat have a significant environmental effect, and the preparation of an Environmental hnpact Report will not be required. The Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with Sectian 15070 of the State CEQA Guidelines. 1. Geophysical A Geotechnical Investigation prepared by GEOCON, Incorporated (December 1999) for the subject site has been submitted. The Geotechnical Investigation indicates that the site is suitable for the proposed development, provided the recommendations presented in the Geotechnical Investigation are followed. As a standard requirement the Geotechnical Investigation shall be submitted to the Engineering Division with the grading plan submittal and to the Bnilding Division with the building plans submittal. 2. Transportation and Circulation The Engineering Department has determined that the proposed project does not result in a significant increase in vehicle trips or traffic congestion. The primary access roads to the project are Maxwell Road and Main Street (formerly Otay Valley Road). The estimated number of one-way auto trips to be generated by the project is 1,176 average daily traffic, The average daily traffic volumes on the Maxwell Road before and after are 1,500 and 2,676 average daily trips respectively. The average daily traffic volumes on Main Street are 18,600 and 19,776 average daily trips respectively. The City Engineering Division has determined that these traffic volumes do not represent a significant increase in vehicle trips or traffic generation as measured by the City's adopted Traffic Threshold Standards. The primary access roads are adequate to serve the proposed project. 3. Hazards The proposed fueling and Household Hazardous Waste facilities are subject to compliance with all applicable standard required permitting processes administered by local, state and federal agencies. Compliance with established standard procedures would ensure that people would not be expased to accidental health hazards related ta these proposed uses. The Fire Department has participated in the approach and selection of fire suppression options on the storage equipment for the Household Hazardous Waste Facility to minimize potential flIe hazards. 4 1-/1 - - The packing and storage area will have two 16' x 10' modular double wall storage lockers and at least one 8' x 8' storage locker. Each of the storage lockers is rated for two hours with containment/sump areas in the floor. Each of the large lockers has an interior wall that divides the container into two separate compartments and shelves on the exterior walls. One of the larger lockers has interior sprinklers and an exterior water connection for water. That locker will be used for low grade and non-flammable materials. The second locker has an autamatic chemical fire suppressian system. That locker will be used for highly flammable and combustible materials. The smaller lockers are designed to hold items that should be isolated and that are typically stored outside at similar facilities. The facility will also have a least one above graund tank for used oil and oil [liter collection. The facility will be operated by a contractor licensed by the State Department of Toxic Substance Control. The connty Department of Environmental Health will perform the collection, packing, and transportation of materials. Additionally, the City of Chula Vista will have 3 to 4 employees to oversee the operation. The Environmental Resource Manager, the Temporary Expert Professional, and two used oil recycling interns will be trained in a forty hour hazardous waste safety class. Staff is qualified and trained to enter the packing and storage areas to inspect the contractor's performance and address any material that may be dropped off at the facility during non operating hours. The Household Hazardous Waste operation will be fenced off and a secondary fence inside the area will separate the packing and storage areas from other uses on the site. The fencing will include signs that notify and discourage the dropping off of materials after hours. The facility will be equipped with a video camera(s) to record any improper disposal. E. Mitigatian Necessæy to Avoid Significant Effect& No mitigatian measures are required to reduce potential environmental impacts identified in the Initial Study to a level below significance. F. Summæy of Public Comments A Natice of Initial Study was circulated to property owners within 500-faot radius of the subject property on May 31,2000. No public comments were received at the end of the public comment period, which ended June 9, 2000. Consultation 1. Individuals and Organizations City af Chula Vista: Michael Meacham, Conservatian Coordinator Steve Power, Planning Frank Rivera, Engineering Muna Cuthbert, Engineering 5 1-1'1 - - Dave Byers, Public Works Cliff Swanson, Engineering Andy TrujiIJo, CV Transit Ralph Leyva, Traffic Engineering Doug Perry, Fire Marshall Richard Preuss, Police Crime Prevention Applicant's Agent: Dave Byers. Deputy Director Public Works/Operations Patrick McKelvey, RNL Design 2. Documents ChuJa Vista General Plan (1989) Title 19, Chula Vista Municipal Code Otay Valley Road Redevelopment Area Plan (May 1985) 3. Initial Study This environmental detennination is based on the attached Initial Study, any camments received on the Initial Study and any comments received during the public review period far this Negative Declaration. The report reflects the independent judgement of the City ofChuJa Vista. Further infonnation regarding the environmental review afthis project is available tram the Chula Vista Planning and Building Department, 276 Fourth Avenue, ChuJa Vista, CA 91910. ~~jJ "W( )<) Date:~.u. 9, ,:;otJo Environment Review Caordinator (H:\homelplanningledalia IIschccklist\JS-OO- 52ND.doc) 6 1-/9 - - Case No.IS-O0-5Z ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1. Name of Proponent: City of Chula Vista 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Chula Vista 276 Faurth A venue Chula Vista, CA 91910 3. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: City of Chula Vista Same as Above 4. Name of Proposal: Public Works Operations Facility & Corporatian Yard 5. Date of Checklist: June 9, 2000 - "-tiaDy Iy Loa..... -- - -- No Impa" ..u""" Im- Impa" ........ d I. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or 0 0 0 II!I zoning? b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or 0 0 0 II!I policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? c) Affect agricultural resources or operations 0 0 0 II!I (e.g., impacts to sails or farmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of 0 0 0 II!I an established community (including a low- income or minority community)? Comments: The propased project consists of the expansion of an existing 53,700 square foot building (the former SDG&E South Service Center) for use as the City af Chula Vista Public Works Operations Facility and Corporatian Yard. The proposal includes the addition of 3 buildings totaling 125.850 square feet. The Proposed use is permitted under the current Zoning and General Plan designations. The subject property is zoned IP- General Industrial Zone/Precise Plan and designated IL-Light Industrial on the City's General Plan. The project is also located in atay Valley Raad Redevelopment Area and conforms to the develapment regulations. No mitigation is required. 1-.2.0 pagel - ..- .......... --, 1, r......... ........... - SJgn;t;cmt No Impact otU"'" Im- Impact MitIgate d II. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local 0 0 0 ¡ population projections? b) Induce substantial growth in an area either 0 0 0 ¡ directly ar indirectly (e.g.. through projects in an. undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable 0 0 0 ¡ hausing? Comments: The redevelopment and expansion of the existing quasi-public facility does not result in additional population or the displacement of existing housing. ill. GEOPHYSICAL. Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Unstable earth conditians or changes in 0 0 ¡ 0 geolagic substructures? b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or ¡ 0 0 0 overcovering of the soil? c) Change in tapography or ground surface relief 0 0 ¡ 0 features? d) The destruction, covering or modification of 0 0 ¡ 0 any unique geologic or physical features? e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, 0 0 ¡ 0 either on or aff the site? f) Changes in depositian or erosian of beach 0 0 0 ¡ sands, ar changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modify the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay inlet or lake? g) Exposure of people or property to geologic 0 0 ¡ 0 hazards such as earthquakes, landslides. mud slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? Comments: A Geotechnical Investigation prepared by GEOCON, Incorparated (December 1999) for the subject site has been submitted. The Geotechnical Investigatian indicates that the site is suitable for the proposed development, provided the recommendations presented in the Geotechnical Investigation are followed. As a standard requirement the Geotechnical Investigation shall be submitted to the Engineering Division with the grading plan submittal and to the Building Division with the building plans submittal. / -.2.1 page2 - .. p- _ny Jy ""'.... SigaJ/kaa, - _am' N. ""- otU,"", Im- Im- -.. d Development of the propased project will not expase people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death. Na active faults are known to exist on the project site. The active Rose Canyon Faults lies approximately 10 miles west of the site. The other clasest knawn active faults within 62 nùles (100 Kilameters) afthe site are the Coronado Bank. 16 nùles; Elsinore, 43 nùles; Newpon-Inglewood, 45 miles; and the Earthquake Valley, 47 miles. The site cauld be subjected ta moderate to severe ground shaking in the event of an earthquake along any of the faults. However, the site is not cansidered to possess any greater risk than that of the surrounding developments. The seismic design of the Structures will be performed in accordance with the Uniform Building Code (UBC) guidelines. No landslides were encountered during the site investigation, and none are known to exist on the property or at a location that would impact the proposed development. Soil liquefaction occurs within relatively loose, cohesionless sands located below the water table that are subjected ta ground acceleratians from earthquakes. Due to the relatively great depth to groundwater, cohesive nature af the fill soils and dense nature of the formatianal materials at the site, the potential far liquefaction occurring at the site is conside~ low. The site is not located near the ocean or any other large bodies af water, so there is nat risk of tsunamis or seiches affecting the site. The proposal will not result in substantial soil erosion or the lass af topsoil. A majority of the project site has been graded and developed. The propasal requires additional grading to accommodate the proposed uses an the narth portion of the parcel. Grading shall be performed in accordance with the Recammended Grading Specifications in the Geatechnical Investigation. As a standard condition af approval the Geotechnical Investigatian shall be submitted to the Engineering Division with grading plan submittal. No mitigatian is required. IV. WATER. Would the proposal resu/J in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, 0 0 181 0 ar the rate and amount of surface runoff? b) Expasure of people or property to water 0 0 0 181 related hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? c) Discharge into surface waters or ather 0 0 0 181 alteration of surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? d) Changes in the amount af surface water in any 0 0 0 181 water body? e) Changes in currents, or the course of direction 0 0 0 181 of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? 1- ,;J.:l.... page; - - - PoteotiaDy Iy .......... ........,... S_ "'-"'t No Im- .tU""" Im- Impact Mitigate d t) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either 0 0 0 I!II through direct additions or withdrawals, ar through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? g) Altered direction or rate of flow of 0 0 0 I!II groundwater? h) Impacts to groundwater quality? 0 0 0 I!II i) Alteratians to the course or flow of flood 0 0 0 I!II waters? j) Substantial reduction in the amaunt of water 0 0 0 181 otherwise available for public water supplies? Comments: The site is currently developed with the fonner SDG&E Service Center. The proposed addition to the Administration and Shops building as well as the newly proposed maintenance building and wash building will be located on the portion of the site which is presently paved. Grading will occur at the northern boundary af the developed portion of the parcel in order to accommodate some bus parking, the new fuel building, the compressed natural gas fueling facility, and the Hausehald Hazardous Waste Recycling Facility. The new pad areas will result in the addition of an insignificant amount of surface runoff. As a standard candition af approval the an-site drainage facilities are required to include pollution preventian devices and fùtration systems in order to prevent contaminatian of soils and groundwater from undergraund fuel tanks and the wash facility. As a standard permitting procedure, the applicant will be required to obtain a permit from the Caunty of San Diego Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Divisian far underground fuel storage tank installation. This established process includes review and approval by the City ofChula Vista's Fire Department and Building Division. No adverse impacts to water resources are noted. No mitigatian is required. V. AIR QUALITY. Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard ar contribute to 0 0 0 I!II an existing or projected air quality violation? b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? 0 0 0 181 c) Alter air movement. maisture, or temperature, 0 0 0 I!II or cause any change in climate, either locally or regionally? d) Create objectionable odors? 0 0 0 I!II e) Create a substantial increase in stationary or 0 0 0 I!II non-stationary sources of air emissions or the deterioration of ambient air quality? 1- 2.3 po." - ~ ........, """"",,"y Iy Lao !haD SIgaffiomt s;p¡oo, SJgmtka.. No 1m""" DIU",,", 1m.." 1m.." _Ie d Comments: The proposed project will be subject to standard requirements regarding the installation af fuel vapor recovery systems aimed at reducing contaminants released to the air. The project is subject to compliance with all standard requirements as part af the pennitting process involving the San Diego County Department of Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Division, the Air Pollution Control District (APCD), and the City of Chula Vista Fire Department. VI. TRANSPORTATION/CmCULATION. Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? 0 0 l1'li 0 b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., 0 0 0 l1'li sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., fann equipment)? c) Inadequate emergency access or access to 0 0 0 l1'li nearby uses? d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? 0 0 0 l1'li e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or 0 0 0 l1'li bicyclists? f) Canflicts with adopted policies supporting 0 0 0 l1'li alternative transportatian (e.g. bus turnouts. bicycle racks)? g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? 0 0 0 l1'li h) A "large project" under the Cangestion 0 0 0 l1'li Management Program? (An equivalent of 2400 or more average daily vehicle trips or 200 ar more peak-hour vehicle trips.) Comments: The proposed praject does not result in a significant increase in vehicle trips or traffic congestion. The primary access roads to the project are Maxwell Road and Main Street (fonnerly Otay Valley Road). The estimated number of one-way auto trips ta be generated by the project is 1,176 average daily traffic, The average daily traffic volumes on the Maxwell Raad before and after are 1,500 and 2.676 respectively. The average daily traffic volumes on Main Street are 18.600 and 19,776 respectively. The City Engineering Division has determined that these traffic volumes do not represent a significant increase in vehicle trips or traffic generation as measured by the City's adopted Traffic Threshold Standards. The primary access roads are adequate ta serve the proposed project. The proposed project is nat considered a "large project" under the Cangestion Management Program. According to the City's Engineering Division, the proposal results in 1,176 average daily vehicle trips and 153/155 peak-hour vehicle trips. Proposed parking for the site is 44 bus and 550 auto spaces. It is estimated that approximately 3% Public Works and 169 Transit employees will occupy the site (total of 475). Due to the nature of the aperation it is anticipated that 350 employees will be at the site at the start af the day and 200 employees will remain at the site during the remainder of the day. Public Works crews leave the site 1-.2.-1 ...,5 - - --ÖOl -tIaU.v Iy ......... Sigatlkut - Sigatlkut No Im- otU"" Im- Impo" Mldgale d between 7:00 and 8:00 AM and return between 3:00 and 4:00 PM leaving the majority of the parking lat available. The Chula Vista Transit currently operates 33 buses and expects to operate 39 buses by November of 2000. The site plan provides a total of 44 bus parking spaces. Parking provided meets the requirements of the Municipal Code and no cmitigation is required. Vll. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, sensitive species, species of 0 0 0 181 concern or species that are candidates for listing? b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage 0 0 0 181 trees)? c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g, 0 0 0 181 oak forest. coastal habitat, etc.)? d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh. riparian and 0 0 0 181 vernal paol)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration carridars? 0 0 0 181 t) Affect regional habitat preservation planning 0 0 0 181 efforts? Comments: The subject site is currently developed. No sensitive plants ar animal species are known to occur on-site. No impacts ta bialagical resaurces are noted. No mitigation is required. VllI. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Canflict with adopted energy conservatian 0 0 0 181 plans? b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and 0 0 0 181 inefficient manner? c) If the site is designated far mineral resource 0 0 0 181 protection, will this project impact this protection? Comments: The proposal does not conflict with adopted energy conservation plans and does not result in the use of non. renewable resources in a wasteful and inefficient manner. The proposal includes a Compressed Natural Gas (CNG) fueling facility that provides "alternative clean fuel" for City vehicles and buses and for public CNG vehicles. l-:z.r pagc6 - - """'.., """'- '" Loa.... - - - No Impact otU""" Im- Im- ........ d IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of 0 0 ¡¡¡ 0 hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: petroleum products, pesticides, chenùcmsorrndrntia~? b) Possible interference with an emergency 0 0 0 I!II response plan or emergency evacuation plan? c) The creation of any health hazard or potentim 0 0 0 I!II hemth hazard? d) Exposure of people to existing sources of 0 0 0 ¡¡¡ patential health hazards? e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable 0 0 ¡¡¡ 0 brush, grass, or trees? Comments: The proposed fueling and Household Hazardous Waste facilities are subject ta compliance with all applicable standard required pennitting processes administered by locm, state and federal agencies. Compliance with established standard procedures would ensure that people }Vould nat be exposed to accidental health hazards related to these propased uses. X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? 0 0 0 I!II b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 0 0 0 ¡¡¡ Comments: Previous Use --SDG&E Service Center A naise analysis by San Diego Acoustics was prepared in 1985 as part of the approvm for the SDG&E Service Center. The noise analysis found that the SDG&E service center did not result in significant noise impacts to the nearest residence on Cherry Paint Drive in the Robinhood Point Subdivision (100 feet northeast of the northern property baundary). The primary saurce of noise from the previous use resulted fram the use of compressed air drivers for assembly and disassembly. Tire maintenance was conducted in the parking areas using air guus to remove wheel lugs. This service occurred between 5:00 and 7:00 PM. Another source of noise, which occurred between 4:00 and 9:00 PM, was the fueling of vehicles. A "tanker" drove within the parking area and pumped fuel into each vehicle as needed. Proposed Use--Public Warks Operations Facility and Corporatian Yard The proposed uses on the site will not result in a significant increase in noise levels. The proposed maintenance of City vehicles and buses, carpentry associated with coustruction and repair, and the washing of City buses and vehicles will be perfonned indoors. The noise associated with the compressed natural gas fueling facility and the Regionm Household Hazardous Waste facility are not considered significant due to the hours of operation. Additionally, the eastern area of the site is /--.2.(, poge7 - ~ -. ---y " ""'tIoan -., SigDUka SignIfi""" No 1m""" Dt"""" Impact Im- """t< d dominated by the noise from refuse trucks traveling Maxwell Road to and from the landfill. XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have an effect upon, or result in a need for new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protectian? 0 0 0 1111 b) Police protection? 0 0 0 Iii c) Schools? 0 0 0 1111 d) Maintenance of public facilities, including 0 0 0 1111 roads? e) Other governmental services? 0 0 0 1111 Comments: The project will not result in the need for new governmental services. No adverse impacts are noted. Fire and police protection can be adequately provided. No mitigation is required. XII. Thresholds. Will the proposal adversely impact 0 0 0 1111 the City's Threshold Standards? As described below, the proposed project daes not adversely impact any of the seen Threshold Standards. a) Fire/EMS 0 0 0 1111 The Threshold Standards requires that fire and medical units must be able to respand to calls within 7 minutes or less in 85 % of the cases and within 5 minutes or less in 75 % of the cases. The City of Chula Vista has indicated that this threshold standard will be met. The propased project complies with this Threshald Standard. Comments: The City of Chula Vista Fire Department indicates that adequate fire and service protection can be provided to the proposed project. Fire Station #3 is located approximately 3 miles from the subject site" No mitigatian is required. b) Police 0 0 0 1111 The Threshold Standards require that police units must respond to 84 % of Priority I calls within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority I calls of 4.5 minutes or less. Police units must respond to 62.10% of Priority 2 calls within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priarity 2 calls of 7 minutes or less. The propased project complies with this Threshold Standard. Comments: The Police Department indicates that the current levels of police service can continue to be provided to the proposed project No mitigation will be required. c) Traffic 0 0 0 1111 1-;1.1 pageS - - - _ny Iy ""'than _.t - -.. N. 1m.." RtU"",", - 1m.." _Ie d 1. City-wide: Maintain LOS "C" or better as measured by observed average travel speed on all signalized arterial segments except that during peak hours a LOS af "D" can occur for no more than .any two hours of the day. 2. West of 1-805: Those signalized intersections which do not meet the standard above may continue to operate at their current 1991 LOS. but shall not worsen. The proposed project complies with this Threshold Standard. Comments: The Engineering Divisian has indicated that the propasal the average traffic volumes associated with the proposed project do not exceed the City's Level-of-Service (LOS) "C" design Average Daily Traffic volumes. d) Parks/Recreation 0 0 0 ¡¡;¡ The Threshold Standard for Parks and Recreation is 3 acres/l ,000 population east of 1- 805. Comments: No adverse impacts to parks or recreatianal opportunities are noted. No additional parkland or recreational facilities will be required as a result af this development since the project does not result in an increase in population. e) Drainage 0 0 0 ¡¡;¡ The Threshald Standards require that storm water flows and volumes not exceed City Engineering Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary improvements consistent with the Drainage Master Planes) and City Engineering Standards. The propased project complies with this Threshold Standard. Comments: The Engineering Division has indicated that the storm water flows and volumes from the proposed project do not exceed City Engineering Standards. The existing on and off site draipage systems are adequate to serve the proposed praject. f) Sewer 0 0 0 ¡¡;¡ The Threshold Standards require that sewage flows and volumes not exceed City Engineering Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary improvements consistent with Sewer Master Planes) and City Engineering Standards. The propased project complies with this Threshold Standard. Comments: The Engineering Divisian has indicated that the sewage flows and volumes fram the Proposed projects do not exceed City Engineering. The existing 8"sewer main along Research Court is adequate to serve the proposed project. g) Water 0 0 0 ¡¡;¡ The Threshold Standards require that adequate storage, treatment, and transmission facilities are constructed concurrently with planned growth and that water quality standards are not jeopardized during growth and construction. The proposed project complies with this Threshold Standard. I-:Lr p0ge9 - - l'ÐteotiaI - Jy ""'.... -, SigDHka s;g.Jfiamt No ""- otUm.. Im- Impart -- d Applicants may also be required to participate in whatever water conservation or fee off- set program the City of Chula Vista has in effect at the time of building permit issuance. Comments: No additional water service is anticipated as a result of the proposed facilities; however, the City is will provide a "will serve" letter priar to the issuance of building permits. xm. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the proposal result in a need for new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? 0 0 0 III b) Communications systems? 0 0 0 III c) Local or regional water treatment or 0 0 0 III distribution facilities? d) Sewer or septic tanks? 0 0 0 III e) Storm water drainage? 0 0 0 III f) Solid waste disposal? 0 0 0 III Comments: No additional utilities or services are anticipated as a result of the improvements to the existing facility. XIV. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal: a) Obstruct any scenic vista or view open to the 0 0 0 III public or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public view? b) Cause the destruction or modification of a 0 0 0 III scenic route? c) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? 0 0 0 III d) Create added light or glare sources that could 0 0 0 III increase the level of sky glow in an area or cause this project to fail to comply with Section 19.66.100 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, Title 19? e) Reduce an additional amount of spill light? 0 0 0 III Comments: Approval of the project design and landscaping is subject ta a discretionary Design Review process. This process will ensure that the project design is consistent with the goals and objectives of the Otay Valley Road Redevelopment Project area Implementation Plan/Design Manual 1- :z.., pag,'O - - ......... -!laDy Iy ""'.... 5;gnüIoqt - SIgnitkaDt N. Im- alU",,", Im- Impo" Mffigale d Addendum. No mitigation will be required. XV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal: a) Will the proposal result in the alteration of or 0 0 0 iii the destruction or a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? b) Will the proposal result in adverse physical or 0 0 0 iii aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? c) Does the propasal have the potential to cause a 0 0 0 iii physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? d) Will the proposal restrict existing religious or 0 0 0 iii sacred uses within the potential impact area? e) Is the area identified on the City's General Plan 0 0 0 iii EIR as an area of high potential for archeological resources? Comments: There are no identified cultural resources within the project area. XVI. PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Will the 0 0 0 iii proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of paleontological resources? Comments: There are no identified paleontological resources within the project area. XVII. RECREATION. Would the proposal: a) Increase the demand far neighborhood or 0 0 0 iii regianal parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? 0 0 0 iii c) Interfere with recreation parks & recreation 0 0 0 iii plans or programs? Comments: There are no recreational facilities that will be adversely affected by the proposed project. xvIll. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF I-3D po.elI - - PoteatioJ """'tiaJIy /y ""'.... ............ - _. No Im- atU..... '"'- Im- Mitigate d SIGNIFICANCE: See Negative Declarationfor mandatory findings of significance. If an ElR is needed, this section should be completed. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade 0 0 0 III the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species. cause a fish ar wildlife papulation to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the majar periods or California history or prehistory? Comments: The site is presently developed except far the sloped area at the northern portion of the lot. The subject property is located outside of the "Sensitive hnpact Boundary" designated on the Otay Valley Road Redevelopment Project Area hnplementation Plan/Design Manual Addendum. b) Does the project have the potential to achieve 0 0 0 III short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental gaals? Comments: The scope and nature of the project daes not result in the curtailment of any long-term environmental goals. c) Does the project have impacts that are 0 0 0 III individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively cansiderable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) Comments: There are no incremental impacts associated with the project. d) Does the project have environmental effect 0 0 0 III which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: No adverse effects to human beings are anticipated from the propased improvements and operation of the proposed public facility. The Proposed fueling and Household Hazardous Waste facilities are subject to compliance with all applicable standard required pennitting processes administered by local, state and federal agencies. Compliance with established standard procedures will ensure that people will nat be exposed to accidental health hazards related to these proposed uses. 1-,31 pagel2 - - XIX. PROJECT REVISIONS OR MITIGATION MEASURES: The foIlowing project revisions or mitigation measures have been incorporated into the project and will be implemented during the design, construction ar operatian of the project: None XX. AGREEMENT TO IMPLEMENT MITIGATION MEASURES By signillg the line(s) provided below, the Applicant(s) and/or Operator(s) stipulate that they have each read, understood and have their respective company's authority to and do agree to the mitigation measures contained herein, and will implement same to the satisfaction af the Environmental Review Coardinator. Failure to sign the line(s) provided belaw prior to posting of this [Mitigated] Negative Declaration with the County Clerk shaIl indicate the Applicants' and/or Operator's desire that the Project be held in abeyance without approval and that Applicant(s) and/ar Operator(s) shall apply for an Environmental Impact Report. N/A Printed Name and Title of Authorized Representative of [Praperty Owner's Name] N/A Signature of Authorized Representative of Date [property Owner's Name] N/A Printed Name and Title af [Operator if different from Property Owner] N/A Signature af Autharized Representative of Date [Operator if different from Property Owner] XXI. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, invalving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "PotentiaIly Significant Unless Mitigated," as indicated by the checklist on the faIlowing pages. 0 Land Use and Planning 181 TransportatiOn/Circulation 0 Public Services 0 Population and Housing 0 Biological Resources 0 Utilities and Service Systems 181 Geophysical 0 Energy and Mineral Resources 0 Aesthetics 1-.3 4- pag') - .. 0 Water ~ Hazards 0 Cultural Resources 0 Air Quality 0 Noise 0 Recreatian 0 Mandatory Findings of Significance XXII. DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation: I frod that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the ~ environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the 0 environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the praject. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I frod that the proposed project MA Y have a significant effect on the environment, and 0 an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the propased project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment. but 0 at least one effect: 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impacts" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the 0 enviranment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all patentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions ar mitigation measures that are imposed Upon the proposed project. An addendum has been prepared to provide a record of this determination. Ú/r¡ IJ() Dale 1- 3.3 page!4 - - ATTACHMENT 3 DESIGN REVIEW COMMITTEE Summary Staff Report CASE NO. DRC-OO-65 MEETING DATE: June 26, 2000 AGENDA NO. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: Consideration of approval of the development of the fonner SDG&E South Service Center into the City of Chula Vista's primary public works operations facility and corporation yard, by expanding/remodeling existing structures and constructing a maintenance building. NAME AND LOCATION: City ofChula Vista Public Works and Corporation Yard APPLICANT: City of Chula Vista OWNER: City of Chula Vista ASSESSOR PARCEL NUMBER: 644-230-11 through 19 SPA PLAN DESIGNATION: Otay Valley Road Redevelopment Area ZONE: Limited Industrial (IP) STAFF CONTACT: Steve Power AICP, Associate Planner ENVIRONMENTAL STATUS: Negative Declaration RECOMMENDATION: Review the project and recommend that the Redevelopment Agency canditionally approve the project as submitted. BACKGROUND: The project site is located at 1800 Maxwell Road in the Industrial Zone. The project site consists of 9 parcels that total approximately 25 acres in size. The project site is developed and accommodates the SDG&E South Service Center. There are presently three buildings on the site that total approximately 54,000 square-feet in area. Surrounding uses consist of industrial development and the County Landfill. Vehicular access to the site is presently taken from Maxwell Road. 1- 3</ - "T DRC-00-65 -2- June 26. 2000 The project site is located in the Otay Valley Road Redevelopment Area. The overall goal of the Redevelopment Area is the "elimination of blight in the Otay Valley Road Area and the furtherance of the area's orderly growth, conservation, amenity and economic development." The City Redevelopment Agency will be reviewing the project after the DRC completes its review. According to the Zoning Code, the purpose of the Industrial Zone is "... to encourage sound industrial development by providing and protecting an environment exclusively for such development, subject to regulations necessary to insure the purity of airs and waters in Chula Vista and San Diego County, and the protection of nearby residential, commercial and industrial uses of the land from hazards and noise or other disturbances." ANALYSIS: Project Descriotion: The project involves the redevelopment and expansion of the existing SDG&E South Service Center, in order to utilize the site as the City's primary Public Work's facility. The project involves the expansion of the existing administrative building at the southeast of the site, the constructian of a new maintenance building, the expansion of an existing shops building, as well as the construction of a new wash building and fuel facility. The project plans call for the addition of 10,415 square-feet of new floor area to the existing administrative building. The floor area would be added at the northwestern and sauthern portions of the existing 31,040 square-foot structure. Floor area to be constructed would consist of administrative offices. An entryway canopy structure would be constructed at the northern elevation of the building. The addition would result in the structure maintaining an approximately 10 foot setback off of Maxwell Road. Because the provisions of the Otay Valley Redevelopment Plan call for a 25 foot setback off of Maxwell Road, the City will be processing a variance application along with this development submittal (please refer to Condition No. 6). The proposed setback encroachment should not adversely impact the streetscape environment along Maxwell Road, due to the sloping topography of the site and placement of screening vegetation along the eastern and southern elevations of the property. The project plans also call for the construction of a 46,540 square-foot maintenance facility located at the west of the project site. The maintenance facility would accommodate vehicle repair bays and serve as the transit center for the City. A second story mezzanine would be situated above the center portion of the building. The proposed structure would be "L" shaped and maintain a maximum height of 37 feet above grade. The repair bays would be accessed via role-up doors oriented toward a parking area located toward the south of the site. The plans also call for the expansion ofthe existing 14,195 square-foot shops building by 16,800 square-feet. The total area of the shops building would be 30,995 square-feet. Also proposed is a new 5,370 square-foot wash building, as well as a 1,312 square-foot 1- .3S- - "T DRC-00-65 -3- June 26. 2000 fuel facility. An existing vehicle maintenance building would be converted into a central receiving building but would not be expanded. Site Plan and Parkin!!:: Vehicular access to the site would be taken via two existing driveways located on Maxwell Road. Existing roadways and parking areas on the property would be utilized for the Public Works facility. A new guest parking area would be created adjacent to the administrative building located at the southwest of the site. New parking areas would also be created toward the west of the site near the new maintenance building. A total of 550 parking spaces would be provided on the site, 257 of which would be available for City staff. The remaining parking spaces would be utilized for the storage of City vehicles. The Planning Department has determined that the project meets City off-street parking requirements. The parking lot layout has been determined by staff to be in conformance with City parking lot standards with regard to such issues as minimum driving lane widths and stall sizes. Other notable elements of the project site plan include a recycling area located at the northeast of the site, retaining walls at the north of the site, and a material storage area at the southwest of the property. Minor grading would occur at the north of the site in order to provide room for planned improvements. LandscaDin!!:: A landscape plan has been prepared for the site. The proposed landscape plan calls for the placement of Tristania Conferta (Brisbane Box) trees along the southern and eastern boundaries of the property. Eucalyptus trees would also be incorporated into the landscape plan, and would be placed on the northern slope of the property. Most existing landscaping on the site would be removed and replaced with new landscape materials. The landscape plan for the site was created in canjunction with the City landscaping staff and is in conformance with the City Landscape Manual. Zonin!!:: The following table demonstrates the project's conformance with the development standards of the Industrial Zone. STANDARDS REQUIRED PROPOSED Front yard setback 25 feet 10 feet * Side yard setback 20 feet 41 feet Rear yard setback 25 feet 49 feet Floor Area Ratio ilia ilia Lot coverage 45% 16.5% Height 50 feet 37 feet Parking 225 required spaces 550 *V ariance required 1- ~f. - - DRC-00-6S -4- June 26. 2000 Sie:nae:e The plans call for a monument sign to be placed at the entrance to the site. The proposed monument sign would measure approximately 7 feet in height and would consist of corrugated metal (maroon in color) on a COncrete block base. The provisions of the Otay Valley Road Redevelopment Area require that monument signs maintain a minimum setback of 10 feet from the property line. The sign provisions also state that monument signs shall not exceed 50 square-feet in area. Condition No.5 of approval requires that the monument sign meet setback and sign area requirements. Building identification signs consisting of individual metal letters would be utilized thraughout the center. The building elevation drawings show proposed signage. A sign permit will be required for all signs on the site. Architecture: Building materials for all new structures and proposed additions would consist of a combination of concrete block and corrugated or "ribbed" metal. Concrete block would match the materials of the existing structures on site, and would consist of a combination of smooth and split face blocks. The corrugated or "ribbed" metal paneling would maintain a maroon color that would be similar to that of the official City of Chula Vista logo. The canopy structure called out for the entryway to the Administrative Building would consist of a light blue metal frame with translucent roofing material. The materials and colors for all improvements on the site would be tied together architecturally and would create a unified design theme. A materials board, as well as colored renderings will be available at the DRC meeting af June 26, 2000 for the Committee's review. PROJECT CONFORMANCE WITH DESIGN GUIDELINES: The City of Chula Vista Design Guidelines address industrial development and are "intended to encourage projecfs which respecf the character and scale of adjoining development, wifh particular attention to sites in older, mixed use areas, and sites which adjoin residential neighborhoods or to the uses which may be particularly sensifive to fhe scale and impacts of industrial development. "The Design Guidelines also are intended to "Promofe a functional and attracfive arrangement of buildings, open spaces, parking, circulation and loading areas which are sensifive fa the physical characteristics and constrainfs of the sife, and which provide efficient and pleasant places fa work. " The project appears to be well conceived and well planned. The proposed improvements are campatible with structures on site and will significantly enhance the existing facility. The arrangement of new and expanded structures creates an attractive and functional City facility that is sensitive to the physical characteristics of the surrounding area. The architectural styling is interesting and provides a contemporary look to the existing facility which was built in the 1980's. The Design Guidelines also state "The main elements of sound industrial sife design include: controlled site access, service areas located af fhe sides and rear of buildings, 1-~7 - , DRC-00-65 - 5 - June 26. 2000 convenient access" visitor parking and on-site circulation; screening of outdoor storage; work area and equipment; emphasis on the main building entry and landscaping, and; landscaped outdoor space. " The project site is consistent with the above criteria in that access to the site is limited to two driveways, both of which are located off of Maxwell Road. Service areas are located toward the back of the site and would not be visible from the public right-of-way. Site access is conveniently located off of Maxwell Road, and ample visitor parking has been provided at the front of the property. Emphasis has been given to the main building (administrative building) entryway in the form of a metal entryway canopy structure and significant landscaping. A comprehensive landscaping plan has been created for the site. Landscaping will serve to enhance building entryways, as well as screen outdoor work areas. The Design Guidelines further state that "High quality, innovative and imaginative architecture is encouraged. The focus is expected to be on the development of a high quality industrial environment. " The building elevation drawings depict a high quality and imaginative design. The building forms and materials serve to create an architectural theme that is interesting, and suggests an industrial type use. The planned improvements will result in a high quality industrial environment the will be of great benefit to the City. CONCLUSION: The existing SDG&E South Service Center is an ideal site for the City Public Works Operations Facility and Corporation Yard. Most of the existing structures and facilities on the site will be readily utilized. A facility of this size (25 acres) is needed by the City in order to accommodate a Public Works operation that has expanded in order to meet the demands of a growing city. The existing Public Works facility located at the northeast corner of "F" Street and Woodlawn Avenue is not large enough to accommodate the expanding Public Works operation. The facility should have minimal impact upon surrounding land uses since the site is relatively isolated and is surrounded by industrial type uses. The use of this existing facility by the City would merely constitute a resumption of its priar operation. The project is in conformance with the City Design Review Guidelines and Landscape Manual. The City is currently on track to complete planned improvements and begin utilizing the facility within the next 12 months. The City is fast tracking this project in order to meet the increased demand placed upon the Public Works operation by the growth of the City. I-.ßf' - .., DRC-00-65 - 6 - June 26. 2000 CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL: Planning and Building Department Conditions: 1. Prior to occupancy of the new structure, all landscaping and hardscape improvements shall be installed in accordance with the approved landscape plan and the comments of the City Landscape Planner. 2. Construct the project as submitted, unless otherwise modified herein. 3. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Building Division. a. Submit architectural plans that are stamped and signed by a licensed architect. b. Structural plans and calculations must be stamped and signed by a California Registered Civil/Structural Engineer. c. Project shall comply with 1997 UBC and 1996 NEC. d. Project shall comply with 1998 handicapped accessibility requirements. e. Plans shall indicate type of occupancy. 4. A graffiti resistant treatment shall be specified for all wall and building surfaces. This shall be noted for any building and wall plans and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. Additionally, the project shall conform with Sections 9.20.055 and 9.20.035 of the CVMC regarding graffiti control. 5. The monument sign to be located at the entrance to the site shall conform with applicable setback and area regulations. Prior to the placement of signs on site, a sign permit shall be obtained. 6. Prior to the issuance of building permits the applicant shall obtain a variance from the front yard setback requirements of Otay Valley Road Redevelopment Area. Engineering Department Conditions: 7. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall process grading plans for the site and obtain a grading permit. 8. The project plans shall depict a vehicle maintenance area. 9. The applicant shall consolidate the nine existing parcels into one parcel. /- .3, - - DRC-00-65 - 7 - June 26. 2000 Fire Department Conditions: 10. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy. all new water supply piping for fire hydrants of fire suppression systems to be tested by Fire Department. 11. Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the Fire Department shall review and approve plans for the automatic fire suppression system. 12. Plans shall specify that fire sprinkler building with more than 100 heads shall be monitored by a central station. 13. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit plans and State Fire Marshal Listings for fire alarm system components. 14. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, fire extinguishers shall be placed in all buildings. Placement and number of fire extinguishers shall be subject to the approval of the Fire Department. Police Department Conditions: IS. The applicant shall comply with all recommendations of the City of Chula Vista Crime Prevention Unit as shown in Attachment "A." Attachment "A" - Department comments H,HOME)planning/stevexp/drcOO65 /-40 - ~ REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AGENDA STATEMENT ITEM NO.: .,. MEETING DATE: 07 /11 /00 ITEM TITLE: PUBLIC HEARING: TO CONSIDER GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A GAS STATION WITH ASSOCIATED FAST FOOD RESTAURANT, CAR WASH, AND FOOD MART LOCATED AT 3733 MAIN STREET WITHIN THE SOUTHWEST REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA IJ.. AGENCY RESOLUTION GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SUP-00-05, TO WORLDWIDE PETROLEUM COMPANY TO CONSTRUCT A GAS STATION WITH ASSOCIATED FAST FOOD RESTAURANT, CAR WASH, AND FOOD MART LOCATED AT 3733 MAIN STREET J>. AGENCY RESOLUTION ADOPTING NEGATIVE DECLARATION IS 00-14 AND APPROVING AN OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT WITH WORLDWIDE PETROLEUM COMPANY FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A GAS STATION WITH ASSOCIATED FAST FOOD RESTAURANT, CAR WASH, AND FOOD MART LOCATED AT 3733 MAIN STREET, WITHIN THE SOUTHWEST REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA SUBMITTED BY: COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR C- t;' , REVIEWED BY: EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (a If: \/ \' 4/STHS VOTE: YES DNO0 BACKGROUND The Worldwide Petroleum Company is proposing to develop the vacant parcel at the southeast corner of Main and Mace Streets with a service station, a car wash, a convenience store, and a fast food establishment. A variety of landscape materials will be installed throughout the site. In addition, all missing street improvements around the facility will be installed as part of the project. The proposed project also includes a 30-foot free-standing (pole) sign to be located along the Main Street frontage close to the intersection with Mace Street. This element of the project is further discussed below. The proposed use is allowed under the General Plan, Southwest Redevelopment Plan, and Zoning Ordinance through the issuance of a Special Use Permit to be considered by the Agency during a noticed public hearing. The Applicant is entering into an Owner Participation Agreement (OPA) with the Redevelopment Agency for the development of the proposed proiect. The Community Development Department's Planning and Environmental Manager reviewed the proposed project pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and determined that it would have no significant impacts and recommended adoption of Mitigated Negative Declaration IS.OO- 14. ~-I - - PAGE 2, ITEM NO.: ;;. MEETING DATE: 07 /11 100 Since the proposed project is within the Southwest Redevelopment Project Area, the Special Use Permit, the environmental document, and the Owner Participation Agreement (which includes the design plans and a list of conditions) are being presented to the Redevelopment Agency for consideration and approval. RECOMMENDATION It is recommended that the Redevelopment Agency hold the required public hearing, take public testimony, if any, and approve the resolutions granting the Special Use Permit, adopting the Mitigated Negative Declaration, and approving the Owner Participation Agreement approving the proposed project without a pole sign. BOARDSICOMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION The Resource Conservation Commission (RCC) reviewed the draft Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project (lS-00-14) at its meeting of April 17, 2000. RCC members recommended that Phase 2 soils testing needs to be performed J2.IiQr to consideration of the MND by the Redevelopment Agency. The results of the Phase 2 study indicated that no further testing was required and this was confirmed by the San Diego County Department of Environmental Health Site Assessment Management. No adverse noise impacts associated with the car wash proposed for the eastern portion of the site was noted due to the industrial nature of the surrounding area and the proposed hours of operation of the car wash and the proposed facility design. The Design Review Commi"ee reviewed the proposed project at its meeting of May 1, 2000. At that meeting, Committee members stated that the project was well designed and would be an asset to the area, and recommended approval of the project to the Redevelopment Agency. DRC members, however, raised objections regarding the proposed pylon (pole) sign. Committee members stated that the City Design Guidelines specifically discourage pole signs and that a monument-type sign should be used in place of a pole sign. The DRC recommended that the Redevelopment Agency not approve the proposed pole sign. The Planning Commission held a public hearing to consider the Special Use Permit for this project at its meeting of May 24, 2000 and recommended approval subject to the conditions listed in the SUP resolution as well as in Exhibit B of the OPA.. DISCUSSION Site Characteristics The project site is located at 3733 Main Street (southeast corner of Main and Mace Streets) within the Montgomery Specific Plan area and the Southwest Redevelopment Project Area (see locator map attached to the OPA as Exhibit C). The site consists of a 67,700 square-foot relatively 02-;1... - "T PAGE 3, ITEM NO.: J- MEETING DATE: 07/11/00 leveled vacant parcel. Surrounding uses consist of heavy commercial/light industrial to the west, east and north of the site, and a residential structure located to the immediate south of the parcel. This residential structure is on a parcel that is also zoned Limited Industrial, which makes the residence a non.conforming use. In addition to being vacant, the site currently does not have any street improvements along Main and Mace Streets. Proposed Project The applicant is proposing to construct a new gas station, with an associated food mart/fast food restaurant, and a self-service car wash (see copy of plans attached to the OPA as Exhibit A). The proposed gas station portion of the project would consist of two separate filling areas covered by canopies. The main service area would be located toward the north of the site and would consist of eight pump islands with a capacity to serve sixteen vehicles at one time. A second dispensing area for commercial trucks (dispensing diesel fuel) would be situated toward the west of the site and would consist of three pump islands (six pumps). A 5,433 square-foot convenience store building is proposed to be constructed at the south of the site. This structure consists of a food mart and drive through fast food restaurant. A drive-through lane is situated along the southern property line of the site, and is accessed via Mace Street. A menu/speaker board is situated at the southwest of the site. A block wall, ranging in height from 6 feet to 9 feet, will be placed along the southern property line in order to separate the proposed use from the adjacent residential unit and to reduce the level of noise generated by vehicles and customers using the drive-thru lane and the speaker board. A noise study completed as a part of the environmental review of the project determined that there would not be any adverse noise impacts associated with the operation of this facility. The proposed food mart will include the sale of beer and wine for off-site consumption. The Police Department has reviewed the proposal and has incorporated several conditions related to the sale of these items, which will make the business operation consistent with City regulations and guidelines. One of these conditions is that the sale of alcoholic beverages will be permitted during the hours of 8 a.m. and 1 a.m. only. The plans also call for the construction of a 1,248-square foot car wash to be located on the eastern portion the site, next to Main Street. The proposed car wash would be situated immediately adjacent to the existing self-storage facility located on the adjoining parcel to the east of the development site. The car wash will be open between the hours of 7 a.m. and 9 p.m.; the food mart will be open from 5 a.m. to 12 mid-night; and the gas pumps will remain open the 24 hours. Land Use and ZoninQ DesiQnations The General Plan land Use Designation for the subject site and the surrounding properties is Research and limited Manufacturing; the zoning is limited Industrial with a Precise Plan (Il-P). Service stations such as the one being proposed are considered Unclassified Uses, which may be permitted in the Il zone through the issuance of a Special Use Permit. As proposed and with the c2'~ - - PAGE 4, ITEM NO.: "- MEETING DATE: 07/11/00 conditions imposed, the service station and its accessory uses is consistent with the Limited Industrial zoning designation. The required findings for the Special Use Permit have been made and are outlined in the Agency resolution approving the Special Use Permit. Site Plan and Parking: The site for the proposed project has access from Mace and Main Streets. Two driveways will be constructed along each of these streets. Access and internal circulation have been reviewed by the City's Traffic Engineer and have been found adequate in terms of driveway width and back up space for vehicles and customers to circulate well. The proposed project provides a total of 32 parking spaces on site. City regulations require one parking space for every two hundred square feet of the food mart /fast food restaurant building, plus three parking spaces for the car wash for a total of thirty parking spaces required. Thus, the proposed project is in conformance with the City's parking requirement. After reviewing the proposed plans, staff has determined that the parking lot layout is in conformance with City parking lot standards related to minimum driving lane widths and stall sizes. The proposed site plan includes a trash enclosure to be located at the southeastern corner of the property and an air and water reel at the northwest of the site. The plans also call for the construction of curb, gutter, and sidewalk along both Mace and Main Streets. Landscapina The proposed landscape plan calls for the placement of fifteen-foot wide planter areas along Main Street and ten foot wide planters along Mace Street. Street trees will be placed along both street frontages. A three.foot-wide planter area is to be maintained along the southern property line. Staff has included a condition of approval calling for the planting of vines on the wall along the southern property line to decorate the wall and soften the appearance of its hard surface. The proposed trash enclosure called out at the southeast of the site would be surrounded by a planter area that would range in width from approximately 3 feet to 20 feet. The City Landscape Planner has reviewed the proposed landscaping plan and found it to meet City landscaping requirements. Sianaae As indicated previously, the proposed project includes the use and enhancement of an existing pole sign to be used to identify the gas station and the other uses on site. The Design Review Committee and the Planning Commission recommended against the pole sign based on the guidelines of the City's Design Manual. However, Section 19.44.060A2c and d (Sign Regulations of the I-L zone) of the Chula Vista Municipal Code states, "Freestanding (pole): Each lot shall be allowed one freestanding sign subject to the following: Maximum height, thirty five feet, Minimum ground clearance, eight feet", while 19.44.050E states, "The design review committee may reduce sign areas below those authorized above based on the sign guidelines and criteria cJ -el - "T PAGE 5, ITEM NO.: J- MEETING DATE: 07/11/00 contained in the design manuaL" Chula Vista Municipal Code Section 19.60.360C Service Station Price Signs states, "Price signs may be displayed on the main body of a pole sign...". The Applicant has forwarded a letter requesting that the Agency consider approval of the pole sign (see letter, Attachment 4). The applicant is relying on these sections of the code, which state pole signs are allowed and imply that the purview of the Design Review Committee is limited to area considerations, not height, to allow construction of their proposed signage, as well as additional data provided in the Applicant's letter, which speaks to existing conditions. It is important to note that the Design Review Committee and the Planning Commission have recommended against the pole sign based on the recommendation within the Design Manual that pole signs are strongly discouraged and the information provided in their respective staff reports. Conditions of Approval The Agency resolution for the Special Use Permit contains a list of thirty-three conditions, which are intended to address specific requirements from the different City departments. The Applicant has reviewed and agreed to all of the conditions imposed, except condition # 29, which speaks to the pole sign. In addition to those conditions listed, the Planning Commission included in its recommendation a list of statements conditioning the project. These statements are listed as items 25 thru 33. Most of these items will be dealt with during the entitlement process. Item #29 is related to the pole sign, which was discussed above. Item # 25 deals with the Commission's request for the Traffic Engineer to look into the installation of medians and traffic control at the intersection. Some of the Commissioners considered that additional safety measures were needed to protect pedestrians (especially children) trying to cross the intersection. They felt that the number of pedestrians will increase in the area due to the opening of the Otay Recreation Center and the proposed service station. The Traffic Engineer looked into this request and determined that no median or additional traffic controls were necessary. The typical median installed at an intersection is only four feet wide in order to permit the necessary left turn lane. Such a narrow median would not be desirable for the following reasons: 1. The intersection of Main and Mace is not a major intersection where medians are normally needed; 2. Narrow medians of this type are not useful for pedestrian safety; and 3. Narrow medians of this type should not be used as refuge for pedestrians crossing the street. CONCLUSION Staff conclusion is that the proposed project will represent an asset for the area. The project is designed with an appealing architecture, landscaping, and other amenities. The project will also provide a needed service for the increasing number of automobile and trucks that serve this industrial corridor of the City. It is staff's opinion that the construction of the proposed building ~-S- - ~ PAGE 6, ITEM NO.: ~ MEETING DATE: 07/11/00 will be beneficial for the City, because it will put a vacant parcel to a higher and better use, bring new development to the area, and will contribute to the elimination of blighting influences, which further the goals and objectives of the Southwest Redevelopment Plan. FISCAL IMPACT The total estimated project valuation is $3,000,000. This will generate tax increment revenues of approximately $30,000, which will be distributed as follows: Twenty percent ($6,000) for the Housing Set-Aside fund; of the remaining $24,000, fifty three percent ($12,720) will be allocated to other taxing entities as part of the tax sharing pass thru agreements; the rest ($11,280) will accrue to the Southwest Redevelopment Project Area fund. The proposed project will generate approximately $28,000 in annual sales tax revenues for the City. ATTACHMENTS 1. Minutes of DRC of 05/01/00 2. Minutes of RCC of 04/17/00 3. Minutes of PC of OS/24/00 4. Letter requesting approval of pole sign 5. Negative Declaration IS-00-47 6. Owner Participation Agreement with the following: Exhibit A - Design Plans Exhibit B - Conditions of Approval Exhibit C - Locator Map H,\HOME\COMMDEV\STAFF.REP\7 /6/003,15 PM\Mo;n & Moce Project.doc r::¿-G. - "T RESOLUTION NO. - A RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA GRANTING A SPECIAL USE PERMIT, SUPS.00.05, TO WORLDWIDE PETROLEUM COMPANY, TO CONSTRUCT A GAS STATION WITH ASSOCIATED FAST FOOD RESTAURANT, CAR WASH, AND FOOD MART, LOCATED AT 3733 MAIN STREET. A. RECITALS 1. Project Site WHEREAS, the parcel which is the subject matter of this resolution is represented in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, and for the purpose of general description is located at 3733 Main Street, Chula Vista, 2. Project Applicant WHEREAS, on December 21,1999 a duly verified application for a special use permit (SUPS.OO. 05) was filed with the City of Chula Vista Planning Division by Worldwide Petroleum Company (Applicant); and, 3. Project Description; Application for Special Use Permit WHEREAS, Applicant requests permission to construct a gas station with associated fast food restaurant, car wash, and food mart (project); and, 4. Planning Commission Record on Application WHEREAS, the Planning Commission scheduled and advertised a public hearing on the Project for May 24, 2000, and WHEREAS, at the Planning Commission meeting of May 24, 2000, the Commission considered a motion to support staff's recommendation for approval of the project; and, 5. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission voted 7.0 to recommend approval of the project; and, 6. Redevelopment Agency Record of Application .2-; - - Resolution No. - Page #2 WHEREAS, a duly called and noticed public hearing on the Project was held before the Redevelopment Agency on July 11, 2000, to receive the recommendation of the Planning Commission, and to hear public testimony with regard to same. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Redevelopment Agency does hereby find, determine and resolve as follows: B. PLANNING COMMISSION RECORD The proceedjngs and all evidence on the Project introduced before the Planning Commission at their public hearing on this project held on May 24, 2000 and the minutes and resolution resulting therefrom, are hereby incorporated into the record of this proceeding. C. ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINA TIDN The Environmental Review Coordinator has prepared a Mitigated Negative Declaration for approval by the Redevelopment Agency pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. D. CERTIFICATIDN DF CDMPLIANCE WITH CEnA The Redevelopment Agency does hereby find that the environmental determination of the Environmental Review Coordinator was reached in accordance with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, the State EIR Guidelines, and the Environmental Review Procedures of the City of Chula Vista; and, after independent consideration of all oral and written testimony with respect to the project, does hereby adopt Mitigated Negative Declaration IS.OD.14 finding that the project will have no significant impact on the environment. E. SPECIAL USE PERMIT FINDINGS The Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista does hereby make the findings required by the Agency's rules and regulations for the issuance of special use permits, as herein below set forth, and sets forth, thereunder, the evidentiary basis that permits the stated finding to be made. 1. That the proposed use at the location is necessary or desirable to provide a service or facility which will contribute to the general well being of the neighborhood or the community. The proposed gas station with associated fast food restaurant, car wash, and food mart is desirable in that it will provide needed services to residents of Chula Vista in a conveniently located and easily accessible site. The project is well designed and the construction of public improvements associated with the project will serve to improve the right. of. way along both Mace Street and Main Street. 2. That such use will not under the circumstances of the particular case, be detrimental to the health. safety or general welfare of persons residing or working in the vicinity or injurious to property or improvements in the vicinity. ,;(-1 - "T - Resolution No. - Page #3 The proposed gas station and associated improvements will not be detrimental to persons or property in the vicinity of the project site. An environmental analysis was performed for the project site in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act. As a result of that envjronmental analysjs specific mitigatjon conditions have been placed upon the project. Said conditions are included in the Mitigated Negative Declaratjon for the project and are incorporated herein as conditions of approval for SUPS.OO.O5. 3. That the proposed use will comply with the regulations and conditions specified in the code for such use. Special Use Permit SUPS.OO.O5 requires the permittee to comply with all the applicable regulations and standards specified in the Municipal Code for such use. The conditioning of SUPS.OO.O5 is approximately proportional both in nature and extent to the impact created by the proposed development in that the conditions imposed are directly related to and are of a nature and scope related to the size and impact of the project. 4. That 1he granting Df this conditional use permit will not adversely affect 1he general plan Df the City Dr the adopted plan Df any government agency. The granting of SUPS.OO.O5 will not adversely affect the Chula Vista General Plan in that said project is conformance with the City Zoning Ordinance and General Plan. The site is in an area that is characterized by commercial and industrial uses, said uses conforming with the General Plan. F. TERMS OF GRANT OF PERMIT The Redevelopment Agency hereby grants Special Use Permit SUPS.OO.O5 subject to the following conditions whereby the applicant and/or property owner shall: Planning and Building Department Conditions: 1. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the project landscape and irrigation plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Landscape Planner. 2. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the new structures, all landscaping and hardscape improvements shall be installed in accordance with the approved landscape plan. 3. The final landscape plan shall provide for a landscape treatment (vines) for the wall to be located at the south of the site. Sajd plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Landscape Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. Construct the project as submitted, unless otherwise modified herein. 02-'1 . ~ Resolution No. - Page #4 5. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Building Division. Said requirements include but are not limited to: a. Submjt architectural plans that are stamped and signed by a licensed archjtect. b. Structural plans and calculations must be stamped and signed by a California Registered Civil/Structural Engineer. c. Project shall comply wjth 1997 UBC and 1996 NEC. d. Project shall comply with 1998 handicapped accessibility requirements. e. Plans shall indicate type of occupancy. 6. A graffiti resistant treatment shall be specified for and applied to all wall and building surfaces. This shall be noted for any building and wall plans and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. Additionally, the project shall conform with Sections 9.20.055 and 9.20.035 of the CVMC regarding graffiti control. 7. All mitigation measures outlined in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project (lS.00.14) shall be complied with to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Building in perpetuity. 8. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain a sign permit for all proposed signage. Public Works and Engineering Department Conditions: 9. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall dedicate two feet of right.of-way along Main Street. 10. A separate sewer connection shall be required for the car wash area drainage system. 11. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall install a 250 watt street light on Main Street, and a 150 watt street light on Mace Street. 12. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit improvement plans which specify and guarantee the completion of the following public improvements: A) Widen Main Street to 41 feet centerline to curb for the 53 foot half of the street right.of.way. B) Construct curb, gutter, and 8.foot.wide sidewalk along the entire Main street Frontage. C) Widen Mace Street to 26 feet centerline to curb for the 36 foot of the street right.of. way. D) Construct curb, gutter, and 5.foot.wide sidewalk along the entire Mace Street frontage. E) Construct driveway approaches per Chula Vista Construction Standard No.1. F) Construct pedestrjan ramp per ADA Standards as southeast corner of the jntersection of Main Street and Mace Street. .2 -10 - - Resolution No. - Page #5 13. Driveway approaches must meet all applicable City of Chula Vista standards and must be 8 feet minimum from the Point of Curb Return (PCR). 14. If the total on.site excavation exceeds the amount permitted without a grading permit as prescribed by the City of Chula Vista Grading Ordinance Number 1797 Section 15.04.150, applicant shall apply for and obtain a grading permit prior to the commencement of grading. 15. The applicant shall address all other comments noted in the attached Engineering Department Memorandum dated January 19, 2DDD and included as Exhibit "B" to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Fire Department Conditions: 16. Project plans shall be subject to the review and approval of the City of Chula Vista Fire Department. Police Department Conditions: 17. The applicant shall comply with all recommendations of the City of Chula Vista Crime Prevention Unit as shown in memorandum included in Exhibit "B: Conditions relating to the sale of alcohof. 18. No floor displays of beer are allowed. All alcohol must be displayed in the cooler area. 19. Locks shall be installed and maintained on cooler doors where alcohol will be displayed. The cooler doors shall be locked after 12 mid-night until 6 a.m. in the morning. 20. Wine shall not be sold in bottles or containers smaller than 750 milliliters. Wine.coolers shall not be sold in units of less than a four pack. 21. Alcohol sales shall be permitted only between the hours of 6 a.m. and 12 mid.night. Other Conditions 22. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Sweetwater Authority as described in Exhibit "B." 23. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the appljcant shall pay all required school fees. 24. This conditional use permit shall become void and ineffective if not utilized or extended within one year from the effective date thereof, in accordance with Section 19.14.260 of the Municipal Code. 02 .I( - - Resolution No. - Page #6 Planning Commission Conditions 25. That further consideration be given to the possibility of installjng a median on Main Street as well as enhanced traffic control for pedestrian crossing at the intersection of Mace and Main Streets. 26. That specification be given as to where the vacuums for the car wash will be located. 27. That enhanced measures for removing excess water on the vehicles exiting the car wash be provided. 28. That a condition be included specifying requirements for landscaping, signage and on.site maintenance. 29. That the signage conform to the sign ordinance and any redevelopment design guidelines and goals envisioned for that area. The signage should be consistent with other new developments which do not include pole signs. 30. That landscaping and street improvements be consistent with the long term objectives of the Montgomery Redevelopment Area Plan with respect to street landscape design and traffic control measures. 31. That a condition be included stating that the car wash will have a "striper" (air.blower). 32. That the hours of operation be clearly defined in the conditions of approval. 33. That prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for new structures all State, Federal and local permits will have been received as required by that particular law or regulation. Applicant/operator shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold harmless City and Redevelopment Agency, its Council members, officers, employees, agents and representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims and costs, including court costs and attorney's fees (collectively, liabilities) incurred by the City arising, directly or indirectly, from (a) City's approval and issuance of this Special Use Permit, (b) City's approval or issuance of any other permit or action, whether discretionary or non.discretionary, in connection with the use contemplated herein, and c) Applicant's installation and operation of the facility permitted hereby. Applicant/operator shall acknowledge their agreement to this provision by executing a copy of this Special Use Permit where indicated, below. Applicant's/operator's compliance with this provision is an express condition of this Special Use Permit and this provision shall be binding on any and all of Applicant's/operator's successors and assigns. 02-1)... - - Resolution No. - Page #7 G. EXECUTION AND RECORDATION OF RESOLUTION OF APPROVAL The property owner and the applicant shall execute this document by signjng the Ijnes provided below, said execution indicating that the property owner and applicant have each read, understood and agreed to the conditions contained herein. Upon execution, this document shall be recorded with the County Recorder's Office of the County of San Diego, and a signed, stamped copy returned to the Community Development Department. Failure to return a signed and stamped copy of this recorded document within ten days of recordation to the Community Development Department shall indicate the property owner/applicant's desire that the project, and the corresponding application for building permits and/or a business license, be held in abeyance without approval. Said document will also be on file in the Community Development Department's files and known as Document No. - Signature of Representative of Date Worldwide Petroleum Company H. INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION It is the intention of the City Council that its adoption of this Resolution is dependent upon the enforceability of each and every term, provision and condition herein stated; and that in the event that anyone or more terms, provisions or conditions are determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, this resolution and the permit shall be deemed to be automatically revoked and of no further force and effect ab initio. Presented by Approved as to form by Chris Salomone Director of Community Development .2. - 1.3 - "T EXHIBIT A ---" \ (\ ~\ I \ I ,\ \ lë) .Ä~~~I~<;.k: All AMANI, President of WPC PRaJECT OESCRIPTlaN: SPECIAL USE PERMIT PRaJECT 3733 Main Street AOORESS: Request: Proposed 3,352 square foot 24 hour, food mart and a detached 1,248 foot self-serve car wash. SCALE: I FILE NUMBER: oJ-I" NORTH No Scale SUPS - 00-05 h:lhamelplanninglhectarllocatarslsupsOOOS.cdr 01/11/00 - - EXHIBIT B ME M 0 RAN DUM January 3.9,2000 .File# D6DD-3D-ZG-652 TO: St.eve Power, .Pla.."ming.Department:. V"-'.A: Clifford L. Swanson, Deputy Public Works Director/Cit,J 1 ~=='::Jeer V FROM= . Sohaib.Ai-Agha, Senior Civil'EngineerJl.¡~ Ralph JL Ley;.-a, :Senior CiVil'En9ín~~ .' S1J3.13CT= -1)c~ign'Review.Appli=tio..": 'for' 3733é:~~treet. (your: File No.DRC-DO-42) . -u- ?::.::::.=.:: ;'::rf:.s :ëìe;;=:::::e:-l:: ::.=..5 re-.-:.e",'e:: ::::e .5~j.ec:: :;::ropos.=.1. v,e ::0 ~D= p=Q9o.5e ::he incl~ion of ~.y condi::ions of approval of the Design R:view :for ;:he S1Jbject prop=....rty.. 30we,\TEr, we request that you prm-ïde the appliCa1!t ,,'it11 the following i1J£o=ma:tio!l: ~. -.. .~~_:~-tglJ~;1;~'~=~1::~~1 (::e ::~iët~ -~~:î:~~:~;::c~î~:; -. ._- - .. for.,::,"or=: 21-.i-?n-~1:=':::=-:) .:-- .. - -- - - ..- -. -~'...~- ::='"0='::':' ::.: =-~:: ::::=--=--e::::.:.::~ =",,5 b. Deyelopmen:: :Impact Fees. c. Traffic Sig-..al Fees .. - .. .- - 2. .~ 1:WO feet dedic.=.:::,oD of r=.g~::-of-",'.=.y =.lo:1g Mai!l S1:reet is req-..:ire5. 3. A s:?=~e se",'e= :::o=ectiO::l ..-='11 be =eq-ci=-:d for t~e car w=.sh ar:a ===.=.::a9= sys::=:7:. 4 - Two .street. lights a:!:'e required, 250 watt on Main Street and.:J.5D . _. watt . on' Mace -Street- 5. The EngÌDeerÏ1Jg Division will réguire the applica1!t to obtain a constrùction permit to perform any work in the City's right of way, which TIE.Y i:1cluD.=, b:::: is :lOt limi1:ed to: .. ¥Ô 02 -I S' -' ~. .. _. ;¡:.::e= ¡':si:: õO::==e:: ::::> .;:. Ce::::,:;=:':.::,:; -~ :::.:=::0 ::::= =0.. --"-- ~--~,- =:'S~::-::::-~sy. -. _::::E:::-..::::: ----, - "- - ---- E~::=",'~_': .. e:::~=,:; Ks=-:: õO::===:: :=:::::s::=. -. ;¡:.:::,:;:: !>Icce 5::=ee<: - ~ "=, Ce::::e=:':.::e :::::> :::.:=::0 ::::= - - n__- s~reer righr-ef-way b. C=sL-r¡¡ct:: cur.b; gu~ter .. five (5) foot sidewalk sl::J:"Jg e:¡ti':Œ~M<iiè:e~Street fr=tage. c. ConstrUct. d=iveway a?preaches per Chula Vis::a ConS:::::-c1:::::.e:: Srandaxd,NohJ.. ' e. CenSt:ruct Pedestrian :Ramp per'ADA St=dards at sou~heas~ co~er of the intersection of JII'.ab Street E..'1d Mace Stre&:::. -. ::>ri.-.reway approac.:.'1es mus:: be eight fee:: minimum from ¡:he PCR and - per ChulaVista Sra:ndards. 7. If tile to1:al on.,.siu exc:av=.tiDD. exceeds the requirements . presI:-.~-d .by' the - ðty oÍ 'Chiù~LVista Gi:-adiTIg Ordina..'1ce number 2797 Sec::ion25_~4.l5D, a gradL"g p~~it will be re~Jired. :-::e =.;:;::'i:=.::: ~E ::: ::.e s::','ise:: :::::s:: ::::,e== ::-.=.~' ;:,§ =§~..::=e",§::::s --.. -.. "C.::,e ::ime .::is/'::'€::' deyelopme.m: "Cakes place E.."16/0r a buildi:::;¡ pe=.i:: is applied for, d€p'>....nåi.:J:;¡ 1Jpon final plë::lS submi::ted for buildi"g pe~..its. '1';-".5 ::-e.sp=se .is based solely 0::1 the pl,,-,""1.5 thë:: were s:::r.itte::. fer 0= ::-e.,-iew. .....:-::- --._----- -=-,~"--..u_--- --, -- --..-.. -,"-- ._--- --- ---.. --'----'------' .._. 3:;;:' ::"e:.:=::, ::..--..,; :Æ;;=",",:::: ':;ame5- :?"-6=y~?=~::s S=:::::.::::: --.E-.i=,ZI<""~?= ...~,~.~"'- --,-- 'YI .. 82- I' ENGINEERING .;;;,~ DIVISJO,,"OFTHE ~ DEPARTME~T OF QUA.- PUBLIC WORKS DEVELOP MEr\ "T CHECK LIST FO~MVl\'ICIP AI:; CODE1ŒQ~S J'TOjectLocat;on: ~:n~~ n7AiN~";"5-r. FileNo. '7-bl - {¡;..c;7 DEDICATION BEQDIREME!\'TS ., .'=mrimg1O 1iJ::phms)'Dl1==:ady .suIm:ån::d2D1Ì:Emmmg~inr~'.1Z:iI::ms Dœ:d beJ""....-:iJ] k ID::iIIœd as =aäm af~ÐÍ:w>ár~.m~;1~~ Coœ.:]'ar:ñmiJe:r.~Dm~1ÎÙs1:Ï1: JÏsI. pJ= ~ P=an3Îsll:dJtt1Zi>oImm ÐÍ1Z 3ast~' ~ OR ;:¡ ~Dfënñl)::åj::2rirm.of~-",~ (B¡j::jrl:s::ripricm: 3-' dPd',;,.;;z;.:;",.. .::J"".." . """"{'~/, ~- -f'".."fï..JJI¿ L" ì'Ô;,,¡,._f . -. .-'-. "°'-": ::oæ I!) c..':}' z:s;::::riäD';'0:;::f=::riDg œ =i=::í=:a] "" m:: ~i= Í>~ g:=1 ~ ",us; ;,.... =.j""",à ¡'y C¡'y : ~~. :sigu::ã ¡,y <>WD::r( s), ....m,;a] sipœmri:s :nmari:z::rl znd a=:p¡=ã by m: ~'. C21J (6191 69 J -5(140 i or '1 ~~.àD=1Ctt~ :PIJBIJ:C IMP.ROv:E:ME!\"TnQllIREME!\'"IS : -"'--'-"---'-"----'_--0""_"- -- -.---.. n- o -" :~" . _ic.",,=....m,5=1rm12.:M.CJ4Dafm: Enm=":;smMnm::majÜ>ã:2!Dñ-fum::ij}'J)Ji::y',ND. 5é3-02.ifz.3uüdIDg ?:::::rniI.isissæ -- - iÌXcm:~-..mi.:~:ar=:Jimn1Z1ñ=DWd:mm=::rl:Ïn5=úm 1224.020afm: C:V.M.c. (S20.000pmsID=?=f -~~':;~~~:"': ~~¿;~~~:,~;'~~~~m ~~=::;;;~:~¿:;~O~:~y ;",p= ,r - Z~~:oci ~~:ci~~i~:"'~) ~:==~=WzL - --- :J~CC¿':}2"mg-=--=--~ .~~ñ;",,?=:;>5-- .. :J_t,Jj,,3'-"YP=~ ;:¡SI=ñ:zm ;:¡-~&i:=:m=;:¡ :J?~~ñ::iv=-....m,=D =siâ=2k :J 7C~~S)(2~ 5--~7fo:;:=;mtmnzriœ¡ !'\ates: :-J TJ):~""""';¡mus¡D-..issu:ãì'~=~DI~~=YD-..ñ=cmID:DD-sit:Í>";¡m,,!,. 3) 5--~ 6 far~~ ~ of1ñ:¡~"';'~1C~-pD1ilit::ÏIDfIII>V==. . .;:¡ It "J'I!=S 1ÏmI yomP"!i=unay =!IIÍI= œi}'" IIÌinar ÚJnsI!m::i!m P==iI (DO ~ jmprov=:¡ilims :n=:') and yo¡: = 10 snimrit m: ~ Dcms: -+ :ms;>=ian f='~ (Am01lIlI .is ó:::!::Imm:d Ì>zs:rl "PDD ~ vain: of wori;: 1D D: ÒDD:.) .oV:L. , oZ -I 7 J'lz¡uc I.>.D'ROY:EMI:.'\"T REQliD:.EME.'-rs (Conl'd): + Su¡"",=J a;. T:6: Con",,)?Jz:J ;0-. :;O"&=f', m-;:..' =~ Z??'!',...:. :Su~:;-~::: i=: " ::.:::." =:10: ;: ===c Co==:;;o::?:::::i: 1°?Tt""D::i:::r Io-. m'I:'" z:¡:: ===0:::5. ;:; =:=,'.) + Suh;ni;=m'j¡;m:== a:: ]C% ofm: =,.¿ :m::i:=='s =1:: D;m: wo:~;O ~= do::>:. 5:=-::;.' =:- ~= of m: foDo..~ iatms: SurcI)' bond iram z ~, ~. j,a1~ z:B::st:s ImÌI>g in at::Ord== ".,...¡, en:" "ojj:::!~ of =diI; us. Om=y; SOVÎIIp]>lSSÌlODk; =1ificu:: of dq>osit b2nk's =Tfficd cbc::k (N~ p::rsom!. ::ampan~' 0: pånjii:1ll:d:UIC :DØI8a:q,abldau:asb bonds). . ... A~;,;;.;:7:-~;~~~Ih=;;' "¿':Br:~j;m~~ Ccnifi::m:of1nsm== ...ui:I;,r Ci1)'of( I'Wa 1U11Mdm Dildilitmalirzsirred_wjfu Ih=fono..;"g>nimnmmJDbiliIy llinns 2S set fonh in "S¡r..ciDcaians for r - 'WàibÛJmDi~;;m.~{Cœ';"¡;'d.Y;î:fd':d1OJiS1hé~BDak.):' . BDðÏJ)' ÎI!.ÌttT\." SSDO..OOiJ .czciJ ~ 51.000.000::zcl¡ 0==== .')1,000,000 ~¡:xroåu= and::ompku:d DJ'=ri= ~,~ 5:!5D,ODO.czciJ= 5500,000 ~ l"øtc - . .A~SÙIgh:~~_:Wnh*,~mxmsin'1ÌJ::==nt ofS2.DOD,{}DD "iU ir.. =siã::r:d ~ m~mininmm"~=~'Ì>:~f~'~~)a!1;,:ãis=riOD oflh= CÎ1)' Eng;" ';o(]¡~ maz:m:;ili="iUin::ìnœ-';';:n=i m ÓDmajor.=aion m:r-..-=nsm=iOD of~ :ttt1pID"=,~ . w;,;-m..õ' 1ñ: =O:~~ =io. ;m':. s;:i.""V."21i:: 211= =bz];;: =OD=Ï:pzy;:,g. Tn= fallow:mg ;'=,,':Ïj :::.,"-'-:;; ~O:-1D ,=.~- of m: Cœ:.=::¡;",,?~ (NOI!:: ;~-..,;;:>j¡ms = "'a~ =:gujr:è if =io5 Dav: D= O""S;r.lO ~ 1iJ::ir.:JÙ1:imaI::lo::aritm andins:aJJ:d unñ::r-pœv1ansiÿ-~ pja=) Tho follow:mg i= = ID b: 5IIÌ>mttI:d ID : ~ ... ~~ D)'2~ om¡ ~fuc=":Í= andzppro.-al' ~ upOD wari:ioaè, tD: c;: - ~~~'31D-'I.:w::=i:s:fur:fu:st~",!,!:"~.,:1 w=1::sfCTanySJñ=qu==.;:wS.) -- ~ - ?;,;;-"~ ~;.,;¡;:- I-~~~UPOD ~ =diCT~' ofwoii:. (.'i2000:nriIriIm=)j -----~--~~ --.----::;: -:-:.~=---- - . - --'-- - - .- . - - -- -- - - --- -. G?~~-='J:"C'., ~Q~!<.::;:-",~: - --- . :J -SID::: ";';'-:;ili:ñs-",,;m,;;'-- iŒ ?i2im;¡"?5 =,=0.: Show:£= ~~gir'...;"g ?ro?õS=a~-o:-1i¡£ sir::. j: =y ~= :i.~: -- - - -z¡m: ~;;,;m~ .,..-=i.~,;;", 2 ¡;::z:fu!¡;p=ri': is~..:!. 11:';';'; is 1ñ: =. = "':X! i= focz:qui!--::l:S.) -- -- t( ñ"?P=iram~~~~2pañiDgp::=i¡=)'b::r-..",m-..::. Thofolla"'ingi==b:fujffibdm ODw"m:J>=i¡: ... A ¡;::zåjDg p1zn JIm>! b:~..,; D)' 2:r-..gi=r:d ""oj) =c;:iD= 3I1d 5IIÌ>mttI:d 10 1m!; ~:ïor =.;::w znd ~ ~ (~~ ~ ¡:ux=ssing 1Îm:: 31D 4 w=1::s:ïor:fu:st:r=ri..-w; appr~ :1 -..:::i:sfuc BIIY snÏ=z1=n=o:í......... + :~]Z:¡;¡ës",,?i:og~===zss=:fo:1Ìl;':"1Ò1= C":;'~:is=2p=-",-,-..j;j::;;-~ .:i:is:;,==y,,=o=-~z (619) 691-5j02. + 5mmõt.z. ~ å::¡>osit, Ammmt;s d::pcndcnulpon =:JpkriIy and = of proj=fnr:pJzn-clI::ci:: jn a::cnrñam:::,..;-. .". ---- - lÌ>::UIy'sFn11~1'rogIam(S2,OOO:mñrlmmn). ... -bnvifu:=:ÏIyin1Ì>:zmamm¡ of: .2:>"'%of~!:2IIñwnñ: =; 100% of1h:: csrim=d::om of "Ppwb;;ww1= (i:. J::Iaining....'Blis, tn1v:::ns, ÏnJ::!s SII1II:Im:s, r:I::.) as tì=mm::d by'fut o;:>¡>roY:d::ngin='s f:SIÍma:I:; 100% ofJaDås::a¡>ing an ~ fzciliD:s; ""d 100% ofhmis::ap::=rim::mma: foa p:::1od sw::ë 1m m: G=nng P::mri1. Tn:: S=:¡;' fo:!Ì>::s: it=> !m)' b::i:n 1ÌI:: == 1= zs =Ii 1m!i= """"'lio:iJ:J;=v= R::~ ~ ,,¡,ov=. '.: A,l..3 -2- ol-I'l' - .. GR.4.DL"G REQù"IRDn:."'TS (CODI'd" ~'OT£: ;~~':~:.~~:, =~-=: ~.,;:c:;,;= :::.;; ~;~~ =:,:~= ;~~;r~~;'i~':~=:~i:=;~~~. : s"Î>==<õ w "'= ~ DJ\-ma::'s 1m;=:ria:: 5== ~~ =.-;. "'"'" .. .., ""'- b ,.. a. D .'ID =-.hu...u.pam;:fm-yœ"-]>IIUpDS::d~:Iiu::iJm::s,,;m;,, iii: Cny'" =:rigitt of...'2~' ""diar = (Call far lÌ=i ENGII\'EERING l'EES A1'.PI.1CAm.'£ ON.BmI.J1ING P.IŒMIT: TJ>: fo]Jtncing;f;s:iDñir=d=~'ID~1m!Ícèumd_~m 1>=pa;dJltIil: 1ÍID:: of >ssuam:c of liI:.BlIilmng P=nit unå: 1il:2II!hariJ:J'afIil:Uty.ofÜlllJaY..ism~Masn::r=5œoànJeaod:DlÌl::r.:ii:l:sæui " . ":as2pprDV<:d1>y~ City CòImcil.-.PJom nDldJuzrtiœf=rJist~/lßINiMiiàø.q,~~ ;:;.Z 0'. ..,jDiI.n;SIIb)errZD~,,;øT".tl#Ût~_"'"'" Dnllœfiiml btù1t1in pbms... 5-=F<=: ,::K .".' '~i,-==,,'=;,,-, o:õ3['.OD;", S="o:::- '-~~-:;nOI1?= ~ S",,=g=~.F=: of'M."?O:¡>::r~.Da-~ r.mn (5=:~ ï for:aãäiIiamJ :infm:mm:iDD) X 5:1...,. m::w(=~h_~~~:ins:zliæioni--:iar m=J iÌmn=rin lDprop=:r :ïi:n=: ~in::ìr.53,D15.00?ñtsS86..00;p::r:iìxnof .:batp¡'¡d::D~m ov::r 35:f=; t'-in::ìrE_14B.DD:niDs589.8D=iDøt ofrlmm:aì>1:: i::œm ov::r 35 Ï-- T 2D:imD 1 D- m::;, ~ -== ~ .ADd S6.OO .; àov:: ;:;.. . "I"j;-:ixiJDDJri ~ (9j Ï=m ñ::pñ::~"óå S' ~,;:OO, ¡ili,s 536.00 P::¡ foD! DV= 35 f= lD .Do,,:: Î::,,-,: --- - - -- --'I"P:imD:mam-~'~msz::a¡;of=~ -. 4"JiW:it:a].-s3Jï.OD;-- -- . . .- ~ T§š~~-;;~~¿*~ ::; ~2~.=, ~ ~-;, Trrlñc Si"1J2"'=::. - -- -- -.. - -----_. / A MOS¡1J::Wpro5=prop=iim:fu: CiIY=snbi=lD2 T:>5: s.;",w.F=: i:;zs::¡j O"""'P::..~mp g::t>=DD!J ""<õ is :;2j~"',-6 / æS13.DDp:r<=ip. (5:::::fu:s::ñ::ñW:: D1l1:Ìp ~Îa::ID:>; ~~=5 & D.) :J Y=piam::2JJïœ ~ iii: ~i2::iliñ::s an ~ Th::"jp ~DI!:f=m will œ i:;zs::¡j D:D m:: PITf?o=3. DliD:mDnDl =- D Y omJilims .ca1lïœ~:fu:= aflil::åsñog:!àciJÏty. JZ1rip:gcm::¡añœ:iåclarwill.becaJI::aJaI!:d bastd an íb:: åfff=:z= -- "'-=:fu: =êstiniznd~ m:s {NO:Œ: ~Dmimãs"'¡¡¡.be givi:n ~ ~ D='= gcnr:¡m:s fewo:r1rips.) - 0- YomJilims.ca1l ïœ~~ of 2Il~= Tn= 1ripg::Dt:rañan fa::mr Will 1>= D=d ~ -me t:SIÎ!mI1::d in=se in 1rips (:if2Dy)-£mmíb::om1miiõmg'tDIiI::n::w. (No n:Ïnnãs"'¡¡¡ ~ givc:nfarJ= s]z::rl =.) ~ -- .3- ~-19 - - D,vtlo"mrnl lmnad Fee< !DIF"I - :.=;>m¡>as:::'~í:=ii:s"-nin::::r. er.-,E.z='==z:>::i! S:::;1=10:>:rF 1:> =D"=::r=:>S'.! :>:1.==°"= 0= = ::><:i;:i::ri-,:-C",'=a:J-St'Õ z:>.:::S::'I:Rou:=,~ ",fo1b,,~ ::i:::<::i::i:::i:r.1O:;';;= j", =::i:::; C:-:-; :~=;;:,,;, =~:>,,-::::,-, =-=05-d T,.,.,.., 0"""'.= ~ ~ 5~famiJ)" d::ó::d (per E)U) ..................... S 5,9">..D..OD ...,.... S E2D.D0 5iDgJe-famiJy~(IIupJI:=ß:.ûmdos) (=E>UJ ..... .4,738.00........... 66.00 MnJñ.fmiüIy(Apamm:zàs)~EDU).................... 3.5S200........... 492.00 G=ä:J~cPcrm:n:) :....................... 1.48,000.00........20.:500.00 ~';'~~iDüi'~~~~~~:::::::::::::~~:::::::. 8~::~ ::::::::.~~':~:~~. 5g:åRise Camm::.ciaI (==) """"""""""" 236,800.00 ... w 1>:: à=miDed GolfCom= cp<:r=) "." "".""" " . . . . .. ""'" 4]4.400.00 ... 10 i>: å..-t=1ÏD=d ,,'=;;;=zJC:::J>=\?==j ............................ 3&4.800.00 ... 1OÌ>=ri~ ~ Y D11Tp1'DJ>DSed pmj=:is SUÌ!Î= 10 ~ hiilir hciIñi.s D1F 10 =v::r ~.= of ~:ID= CiIy's i:acifuj",;: ~JTvœmr-;o;"', . .ImsL ~{p::rE>l:l ........:............... ........52.150.00 KOT~{==)................. ..........., JO.750.00 - '.=:::-;=P=:iF"-,=isj~"Ë1m O:"yJ'==il y~= 10"'.5 io:-?=ó=sr::izn3rièg=D]F:'::=: - ~l=d=~ZDùl ........................ ..... 5545.00 :ø: Yo:r;=pos:rlpm,i-iswiDriD =orJDOl""-ni1:Ì1dD1iDw:ingm.;",,~ or=Ï>zsin5 (D]F:i'=:m ;",~...;m~o -_. -n:-=ilinngP=Î!)-'-"_._~_..- -- u.- .--_u- ----- .-- - - ---.. T~.Qmy¡m~ÍJ==J...:.:.............. S4.579.0D - --. .--- - - . .7=.'.~"1'¡'("-""Y""'~o:,~=:,-C) :-'::::-::.:~...:-56D.O[J. -~. -. -i~r=~~~~~~;~,~;;~~~c-~-....... :~~:~; ~~.s~~-i!yjiDWS-(?-...EDL1-.. ".-'-'."" .-.. 2&4.00 - - -- Ò'DUI ::r:,!= ""'}. :f.ill ~ "" == riis:ri=! wID::b.i:z! zi:r=rì}' pzj¿ 1D= ::qui::-=d 2:>:rF. :rr. m= i:ri=riOD :r--g2I::ÜDf :D=vci~:im?=:'=,pi=zs==:::1Ì12:5=:ion-s=ñ'" (619) 691-5024~ :3505 OJ' (619) 691-5258. :"I DE: T6 ~ fur E Dz.s=:i solciy œ: 1D= pj= ~ m>rl å= DOl D==:Ss2:::iiy:in::iJ.uj: ill :ñmJ :r-~. 11 is ~ 2S , "2Y m 1nfœm yœ, 2S z œv-...iDJ=!DWD:x, I>Ï D.= g==:a1~";'~ m>rl .= yon = 1:IpC'" 1D == as yoarproj= ~'Thr:~:æid :i=SI:DD:Ii=ìh::rcinme DDÏy1imse È>pCSed 1>yD.= ;:,,~ Division.. Yon slma1å "PŽdact - - - 1D=D:;>anmi:m m"'BuiIóiDg ß:.Boasingim:iIñDlImlIÏml ~ aãåiIiœm1 f=. 'pJ2s.... do 1IDI il=sÏm:= Ie C2ll1iñs Ji=;panm::m fa: fuI1m:r:infonnarirm. ~S- .. 01--2.0 - - 'LffiC'll] ..R TIUJ> GF.""ER..TIO"'- T ...BI E IO"T-W... Y TRTP"\ 'D~ 70z5: 5,=: ?= z.-: '=:ci "" IÌr = 0=,,",- == = .=:::z:,=~ ,,",;, 5_L_"-=>_<,G-, .3;-.:.' c".~-{ c'- J -:'--,:".:" -:- GcnC:--=:I:), ;'0';; fC>T ,hc 5=, :Ju:g" Rt:gwr. ~:::: b=- :- =-- ;=-.. " ~=",,1:i or. oS 2:3 .ú~ ;>== "'?- ;=::="',:= :>=: ==:' Tn¡, G:m:miDD ú= åzy) raz10: 1.aDdlMr~ (J""-1:rÍD!: "/.-TY:::) SCrri::esœiau;,<. . '.~i~~~;.;;~':::::::::::::::::::: :::::::::::::::: ~:'i;':;:;:: ear:-~S13riaD d=s;gn :.. --- .. .. , .. .. , - .. .. .. .. , .. .. .. . . . .. 150 TIl'iIcling spaa- A1namarit: "-".....................................oo.... . . . .. 900 T/Day Dr 600laD-.. .s-~"oo.....oo....oo.."....oo................._.....,... JOO T!S!,,]] .l.mos:.b:(ê:zj=&=,--- ---'-.--.,-. "'-----.-. .,----_.,50 TfJOOú51'.or3úO:a...-"'torõú:s:,-,',=:s:zli Amo ~ =- .. ..'. .. -oo . .. . .. .. . . .. . .. oo . .. . .. . . .. .. .. .. .. . . . .. 20 TJI000 5.F. Dr 400.-2= Dr 20is:r:n'iœ s:ra1J ~¿Lamr - ,,<'3:lauk("":1k-intmJy) .""""""" """"OO""'" oo............. 150 TIJOOOS.F" Dr JOoo/a=: J3auk (-..DñJ:!ri-.1>p w:iDóa..-) """"""""""""oo.......... 2OD .'TJ.lDDD 5£ or.150Di= - --..s.nomg.:.t:hn ".. ......"...."....oo............."........... .60...TIJOOD£E""":8DD12= c:.mm:¡,.ør 5~ .. .. .. .. .. .. oo . .. .. oo .. . oo . . .. . .. . .. . oo . . . . . . . 9 TJJ ooo'si";DT 4o.2::r-- c:ñm::è:stŽlDa1 :". - -" """"'oo"oo...."....... . . . . . . . . . ..... . . . . .. (5= '$t;boo1s") Camm:::rcialœ::=.(:Iùs:oSlrip~)_...... .... ............. 40 -TIJDDDS.F.or400l.::r.... C==m.!-'<ÏILH.w,g = (3G-60=::s, lOOK-30m:: 51'.) . ... , .. - - -. 70 T/JOOO S:F. or 700,= :<~åsñ~ =«JOz:::--'. <lOOK S.:_ì :~:. ,-'JODD 5':- 0: 2~Dh=== C=zj~: ~--.. """OO"'oooo.. ......................... }SO T/JDO05.F.or100D.'a= Cœn-::oicm::=J:-..I OO"'OO"'OO""""""""""'OO'OO' 700 T/J 000 S:F. Dr 700 Dù:::œ:mJ:ÌlIÏ:> .. .. .. .. .. oo oo .. . oo .. .. . . . . . . .. . . .. .. .. . . . . .. 60 T/1 OOOS.F. Dr 800:,,= Dù:::œ:m= ".. -"... . "" .. .. -"".. .. .. .. """'" oo .. 60 T!JOOO5:F. Dr 600."'= --=-=-_.........-.-.....,~..-..:_.-'7..;.:.-......:. "T/J00OS1'.orl00,'a6-: ~~~~~~:~;:-:::::~::~-~::~::::: - :::~:::::::::: :-~~- ;;:~~::~~~=- Gzn5::z:=..........._.:....::.........- ""=-'--'-'----'--'.'~ 40 Tíl.Q¡JOS.F.or90:.=_- - Bos:pj:z2: - - --- - - --.-~. _nn -- --- - -- ---- - - . - - -- - _00---- ~: '-=-....~or2D'JDO:.5.:.D:2;'J-== ~.Dmn: """"""""""""""""--""""""'-'---~ I';;3:å .--- _0-- . -- --'_~-cb~--- - -~-- ~- -- ----- - ~'3nsin=-;o:ci: (Camm::-'...zJ in-i.".--,) . - . . . . . . . . . -. . . . . . . .. .. T'1DOO 5':. or 200,'.::;-, ~pzIi:(No~) '-'-"" .....:....oo.... .--..oo.....'- .8- -TL~.DT90ia= 1:n:ñ=:ia1 piam (mWDpJ: s:irifu) ............................oo.... j 0 T/J 000 5:F. Dr 120/= Manm'2::mI:inglz=bJy.................._.._....._............ ' T,10005:F.orSO/= Wm:::hoos:iDg "..................oo............................ :5 T/JOOO 5.F. or6Df= ~ """ --...........oo.....oo............ OO"'OO...... '1 T/JDDOoTO.2h.",,}¡or30i.= LO';::'7.-=ci1.so å::\'ila;=r oo...........,................... E TI1 ODD 51'. Dr 80/.= H=::¡-.mñ=m::mian:iO::iliñ::s&= """""" """'OO". 10 TiRoamDr3DO1= - Mm:::1 "" ... .. , .. . .. .... .. ., . .. .. .. , .... oo .. .. , .. . oo oo.. .... 9 TIRDmn or 200/= -- - ~~':"':'-"""."': '-,:: .-....... ....,-::.:: .::... "':""" E TlRDmno}')oola::r: - SIanãaro~ Dffi=ñzWå:ing «100,00051'.) . -oo --OO"OO".... 20 mOOD 5:F. or3OOl",;;r-- --- Bmnàmd~nffu::;""ïm"g (>100,0005:F.) .....:. .."oo..... 17 TIlOooS.F. or6001a::r: Cmp~Dffi=1>cilD:ing(s::ingJ-..=) ..............-.oo........... j4 T/JOO05:F.or14o.",= M:dñ:aJ¡å::ll!aJbmïm,,2-........................- """"""', 50 TIJOOOS:F.orSOOf= ".. '?It = 02. - .:2../ - ~ ... "EHlC! .. TRIP GE"-"ER.. no...- F ",("TORe; Il.Dn,'d.1 P.:s~: S"'fi, '=iiy è==,,== :0 7.'5JDfJ, :z=i!, ~u'=ll=~' C=:io~b ......... . . . .. ..... .. . . . .. .... .. ¡; TTunn ~ """""" .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . .. . . . . . .. .. .. .. .. . . . . . .. 6 TJümI Mo1Dk 3Iam::, AdabumJy . .. . , . . .. .. . .. . . . . . . . .. . .. .. . .. . .. . .... - TlVnit ...~~~::¿~:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::: ~. ~~c: ~.' '. Low~'gœ]ñy~ ........~..... """"""""'" Joo TlJODD.s.F.OT3!=.DT5DO¡,,= ~¥1IIIJJDV<:r .............. ......,................... :!DO TI1OOO.s.F.OT7is::ator 12DOi= :ñsI-fClDð-.oÏlbDxivr-tiIroagJ¡ . . .. .. .... . .. .. .. . . .. . .. ... ........ 700 Tn ODD S.F. OT 231=1 'OT 3000/= :=-jooè"-;:;'ou:D:-;v='¡¡"-a~ """""""""""""""'" ,5ú TJjOO05.1'.OT::2'S:al ~= """"""""""""""""""".""""""'" J 00 Til OOD.5.F. of possiJOOUI:a 5dJOo1s:: ~{4-yar).............. """""""'" ............. 25'TJSmœntoriOOl= CammmmyI:<>1kge f2-y:a:r) "'" .. . .. .... .. . .. .... .. .. . .. .. . . ... 1.6 TJSmœntDT 8D1a:::rr: .-;;-~c.imo1 ..,. ....._,......... ............... ...,........... J.4 ...TIS1Ùd=i-DTJ1IJOOD5.F.DT5DIa= Mitidi:"",;..;Ëg]n:hool...... .. .. . . . """""" ............" . .. J.O TJSmœntDT4DIa= ~'.................................................. J..! TJSmœnt or J4!][)00 5":. OT 60':,,= ~.= ....................................................5.0 T/Childor80nOOOS.F. ";n~:. ï;'"= 21---'~,~ ;--=';0= :2=1o:-:,=".-,o,.j:;i=::. ""':.-x=': ~=>:l!"::: == ¡';~"=w:zJ v==S:;:::i? g:"="",;o,, s;;"j; "=:l.' = :""':"'.,=.: :;;" :;~.:5: 5:ìfml ::0=. - ---.- -- .. --.. - -- - .-. -.. - - --.- -- __d' ....n. -:C"D.u-"1Œ..u'-Th"FORMA.TIO1l; _n .-_.- -.'.- ----.--. -_.---- ----'-'--. - ---'. - - .. -.- . ::::""'-;-.4.- "O.-;,;,5:..-n".., ::':".0'0 D::::~_~ '\~=],i:::::=",.c::=~. =~ ~,,-::::=-,=,=,,~¡==-,:,==,:,,:o:: =:::= ::""=:::0--=--=:: cO =-=l: ~ ;::::,;;: '"'7D'.'=:';' ::;'-.;=lE =y:,: p'o"'= I::: z:oy D:-:::: iDliD"-::og =,,"": -- -----r- ;;'~Î;;;;;"';~f1D=~'~;o-';¡¿~,,~-;;;;¡¡jri~ - -~-:: =~-;;~~::;~r~~=,:-:~~~~~=~:",:~::==- 4. 1!WOI:Ùd œ ~ Ie D2.v= 1mprov= 1n=]J::d zs :1m m-=J] proj=- (NO:r:E: :D-...f=zJsJD>}' nozœ ~fan=zsan of:5mmcial~.) T 0 ~. forz Ii::ï=zJ, yon 11mS! =1= "Ik:n=v f= Z\~j: Z! -fu~ Eooci:J-m~ Di'I-isiD!! ,,==. TlO: ZD?li::a';DL == :,., =~DYIÏl<:~i:o=~=ñmIÏl<:~.F=~. - - . Jf 1he à::i=a1;,; gI2II1'::d, 2 ro:dz hond {US;=cy Dr" =riñoiI t2SÍ1it:I's t:b<:clë):Ïn IÏI<: amoan! ofJ 10"10 of"lk :stiJmI::d ~ of"lk .' - .~bcing-dci=n:d=œpns1::d-w.i!Ì1Jj,eOt)'F=::::O:ffi::::. ..'. . - 1:n =:œin =,"Ik City ~ 2="'12 lli:a 2gZÏDSI"Ik ~ prop::Iy :Ïn n:::n of"lk casñ Dand. However, 1D= fonD'\-1ng it=s = œ 5DÌm1in::d b::iar: 1he C:ity will amsid::r æ:::::p12n:::: 01z ==' _. A i=:fIom tb:: ap;ili::amfWiy ~ ...'¡'y m= ;s z ~ for " Ji::n m liT::! of me casñ bcmd. .. J.l7 ~ 02 - -'.:2... - - DEFERR...., 1'1,"FORM4TIO,\ (CoOnr'd, -- .'.=: ~J of';'" ?,,?~'?'=?L-== """ S1~ b~- Z 5:= 0: Cz.üfa-..2 ~...5=:; .L.=:s:-.- 5~== "==;.,,j shz:: hz'." ~ ;r==-:è ""¡",, 0" :i2~~ afID:,;,:: of:::-. ":T"-= :'::~= f:r ~~ 1:::-..- ~,;"" :-:zn~: fo" z~ ZpP"z.¡szJ ¡, Zpp"o:::jmzl:j~- 5:::;[' S:;['O fa".. siD~< !zmily hom: zIIè 5"'-000 10 5",-SOO fo~ ::Dmmen:ia¡ p""pen:-. -, ." TnJ: 1ù;pon;=;>m=! by a DtIe iD=:e t:om¡>aII}' wi1mo 60 œ}'S of m:: da1:: of tht: ,.7iu= n:qu-...n. Tbe price ~ f01 TJtJeBoportis~~1OSl5O0 foT.am.:¡eiamùy homcand S2.000 tDS:!.50D for commercial propeny. " ,. -- PROCEDmiE FOR THE INSTAIJ.A.TIO1\l OF STREE-rLIGÌITS jj":;,= =;,~ mm= ¡;¡~ "",!WI=:oJJ 10 ms:.Jj CD: or m= = iiglm, Ii>: ;olio..'11>£ st::¡>s = ""-'1uiT-..c.: 1. TIle à::vdøpcr, iUs =P=r ar1:tlIlml!:lDf2pJ>lit:s fur.a ==iIIDJ=IÒI £ram this d..-pam=n 10 mswJ 1M == Jigñt. (.-ili =~far.~J>c:mit~";"-'=W>-tin~ l.j - . L .2 TIle1':ìÌlD!s$u';lIIn.jJI.x:bet:k;wj¡ñ m::Thd'iic 5caixm 1D~:Ii>: :xa¡:¡ lm:a:rion. of:Ii>:~ =-];gin; -. UDan~2iås.in::atian1Dm::D:=3=ar.mS>l= ,;",æ,-..1=::o:c:Z= 5zI1Dj""o Gzs &:::J:..""1ri:1O O"WI> m: ~~.,.,m:m::æian. . - - . - - .:. :-o~ :i.""'ciO?:-. ==- =::= .;:::¡7::O= S":"'=: "".TI..5Ì::-.:::: :;'0..-;:'. .I o:::::~ :oliov-=;: A S1:r= ~ 1=::íœ 3. .5:m=po;m c: C. Condråtsize,~æñJo::miIID .. D. .?IIll1xx=; ..:.~-=~ -~ "'W""¿m:s-==-:n~'_~-- - _.-'- .:-.:e_-=- --- --_-: 5._TIle1::zffi::S:::::rim:~io""pp,.m'2J'- .----- -- - - - n-- -- _on_> ?-'~:!-.s"=:ò:r~"",~;;~7.i'f;;;;¡;::;:j~:;:",;-",,=-~;;;S=;"; ~- ."- - - - - - --- --. ._n__.- --. ----- SEWERAGE P ARTICIP A 110" FEE T= c:¡",jz ,:;"" em. Coo",::iLmsmnDori=im::::oJJ:::riIID ofzÏ--1DziDintht: =of~~ =din m:: r:i1\'. This j=e ;s "0=1:." coñ==:rl "",;,:,;",= oj =:=nrm 1:> me DUbD: = or w;,::¡¡ z ~ is issu-;ò jar ..i~" "Dñ=Din¡; ~ in = ....;"""~ Ìm;i:iin~ Tn: =Ï--js ~?_??O.OOp--~.,.j=Dw-..lling1JIñ¡ {EDùl. arsiDgk:famiJy ãw-.liing' ~in~ 125<: of ==::i2!Jpmj= Ì>z=i IID~F=1mi1s (EFU)]. Th:ii>Jlowingis1Clkl1S:dzs z gW.dein a1:;nJ3riDJPñ::D:daryom ~:ñøwev:r. tb=:fimù ~ Will 1>e 1>zs=j t1pDll1D: phm ~ fur z ~~ 1'.e:mn=. ;. R::s;å=ri21' -------.._. ,- Singk Family Dwc.lliDgs ... .. .. .. .. .. . .. .. . . . . . . .. . .. .. .. . .. . . .. . .... 1.00 EDU MuJñ-FzmiiyThciIs ("P"=>=, ,..nnñ~<, lri¡>l:xes) .,...... .. .. . ..... 0.75 EDU Mob~ E=. T:ail::r .... . .. . .. .. .. .. . . .. .. .. . . . . . .. .. .. .. . . .. .. .... 0.50 EDU .. ~r . - -; - 02 -.2..8 SI:"\>.n...GT PARTICP'...nO" F"EF I("ony'd" (:077"-=-'-:2" ?_\".?z=i:3 .... -"""--", """""""'" '-""""'" -.. .... O.:5¡=iwaJ.:-uppJus.:õFüsmb;:;;s\=w.J:< ks:amzms: . ,_5maD{Sl:mÌDgbn¡mxIJOO) """"""" """"""""" ..EFUcDu:nt(sceubkbdow) ;£if¿~~~¡,; ;-,i~= 5<:Jf-s::!\-;œ Læmåri::s" .... .. .. . .. . . .. . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . . . - . . . . . . . 0.5 EDUlwash::rpJus EFUs DD1 mm::hf:d to"""2! . ::a::jjj';-s =ng ,,= ia-,;:an=smg pmp= sD2Jj i>= 2=saj ;",;;\,àIWb' iJ)' Ii1= DEcaor. = Faciliri:swilil ~svm:ms5baJ)iJe.ass:=ss:cdÉliividD2li\..dnÏmmarillD=nñred:for.= sJWJ Dtprm.;ó:d b\ ..apj>1ú:am. f ""c " -- . ,', . -.. .' T~kfoT",,¡""nm....E=Tjs: ~ .EL' E1= B! 3rmr(r~J).... -..... '-"" 5mkt"=ñ-.",,;.J:i=ilirr~y) "" -. . .. -4 ~...'............ ...... ...-... 5mk \""25Ì!-up. :æ:b = of~ . . . .. :! D=Jmma:-~ ......-.. 'Li:i=J (iius;¡ =1:, ="",~" ;0::::""= '~:O::2~, L~ ::>="=.;-.23.).. ,;, ~mDa:-=iD:i>=s,,~ """'.-. üri:œj~mni n............. ....... :5 2.z>'JI!IXY.".. ""'" ..._............ ;) Lõrimù(,,"'¡¡)............,......,... :5 lznIm:!' {D=!ì .. - .. .. .. .. - . .. .. ... ] T o~ (I2ni;:) .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ... :5 5:i:ù:ar iiisiIwæ:ñ::r .. . . . .. . . . . .. . . . - " ' Toij=(T2h~) ""-"""""""'" ]0 .. - . .. .--n. .. -~.. <fffi'. M']!~?I"po~J:ER~~:~:)", -G;'!> ~.;œ 1mn1DIrIili-.. ¡'y 2D5 GP.D=] 3:>V &"- - Mulri;>jy =J¡ iJ)' .>2220 to ::ci:æi= to:;¡] i: ..... _n -~ _~~_..n_u__. '-- -- ~ ""'T:< ry, c' (\')M".~-.-:-::.: -- .~..- P-. -- -- -- - . .. - - -. - ..... -.- .. -- "'If' .- Cn=:-.J: Es: b)c -q..", '. \. \.-" S:c-.\";", ~--, ,/':J/']~ P;'O:o:: í6]9,', ¡~':J¡-5c-.¡.:-,~ .:; - .J. 'I .. .,. ~.._- CHUL< 'Er-< POUŒ DEP-~=-7 <:RIME PRE\L."-nO~ 'ù""!\TI PLA.!';; REnEW Dare: Jamwy19;2000 . . To: S1evePO~~- - From: Richard E. - --- rnne Free Multi-Housing Projea: DRC 00-42, 3733MaÏn.5treet . Fo1lowIDg.POJDIDems are to æsist with~c proper milizaIionof security wdware, aJam¡s (access comrol},c~~:a.mn~2"tri~ . :'~"~; ,;..¡ iàcü víly,;and .mbeigbtCD:;crimc preve:nrion awareness 1ÌJroU!!Ì11De amce:p1 :of~ defelisibÌé -spaœ~ -æd1mvñ-{)II]])eIIIa1dešign. ACCESS COl'lROL XX Perimeter .sec:aÚy DOOT> XX Steel1ioar:fum1es - Solid core doaI3 XX -~ ~=~=-~ -=-~~~~~~~-~~~oni~l;~'-:O-~~~-= = =--~:_- - - -- - - - --.. - --- --. -.. -- - ------:-.::. =-=~==-==-_.:_.:.---c-:_-~_::-'-_.---':'~ -~. - -=-----'f-o.,-::-mcil s-;:r~ws-fCJr moœËng deadb"lt-1ock.sm'1æ Dl2.L::s ---- ~ - Pf4J Holes en -:íTont .doors, 1.80_deg:re"'..J3Ilge of view minimum- ---- -Glass- --.. ------------- ----- - Wmdows must meet.Þ-4M:4 FORCED EJ.íTRY RESISTANCE STANDARDS - SlidiDg g12ss rloor(s) must have Track aT CbaImeI locks - Glazing Exæ;-¡or XX SecmÏIy Dardware XX Security sysæm( s); camera -and special applicañons L --. .- - .. - _FenciDgandgates . --- '-c.-...c. .---..----- C!'IED ""'PD'C'I!""" ,s-ð Ol--'~ .. - ~ . -- -.- CHù"L~ VISTA POUCE DEPARTME~"T CRJME PRE\"L'ïION l~TI PL4. 'V RÐ IE.V SURVEnLAN CFlD ETECTI ON XX Lighring - High pressure sodium - Low pressure sodium -'- Metal HaJides - Break resisÌanthamper~i>fiixmres XX"MinDmm1PJ1~{12-:feè't) . -- XXcIriinsiTiDnaHighring' - PJace:meIJt XX Landscape appJicarion - Trees/shrubbery mamxamed XX Grnffiri detern:m - VmDility ~ :trees .cleared up 2t lees¡ six:feet, shrubbery trimmed down to three fuet tall - - ----- _Exrer:iDrvie~'-Í"'fI.rjDi . -- -. - - -. - - Wfoùgb!.ITon - Tübu)a:r:sree] - Cham fuJk - .- - - - - -. - -.. - -. . XX- S~cu¡iI},_¡¡j~ SYs.:.:n:s.. --. . - -- -: P~~er .~_~orion d~OD - ~ --RobberylHold =1' . .xx ~ur~aryJ1mrusion POllCE RESPONSE :x..'C Addressing - Access to property - Knox bax XX V1Sibility; allowing patrol officers to moniIOr acrivity :xx RepDIring :procedures C!'!UJ CVIDa" 0</99 S-I ~-.2..(, --- ~ ~ --.- .. CHl:"L.\ YISTA POucr DEPARTME)l.j CRL\Œ PR£\"L'\lIO:-< l:~TI PLA.7'<; REVIEW .,< POliCE SERVICES TI Traññng of1DlD12gernem and employees in se.."Uriry procedures and crime prevemjoD awareness. XX Secoritysmvey~ed by1he Cñme Prevention Unit. -.- .' SPICIEICRECOMMENDATION5 A~ì) CûMMENTS C:-i:::>= ?reve:rian ?=aDIld 2Te a\"2ilibJe far U2Í!Ji~ reganiing emergency and paJice reponing proœ:iures. ScheàuJiDg of!his mmñDg is reca=ded 10 coincide wirl1 me beginning of regular openmons. Thank you "fur me oppornmiI:y to Dave input 1mO !be plæming process. If you have any questions ornIcan be offur1he:r.assistancepJease call memmeL:rime Prevemjbnunif m69F512T .-- --. --.- -- .- . -- . -- U __H_- - n - - -- - - --- - - - - - - - =- ----- ----- -----_. - - - -- -- -- - - C!'1W ..)0( C\'!'D.cp!: """'" " .. c2 -~ 7 - - . ..~~..~ 505 """"£""TTAveN"E ~---"'"'-" . POST OFFICE S::X 232= ~ CnUu. V'.SõA. CAU;:oRNJ,< ~1512':Z32: '. -- .. - . (5,g~2!).1"':; .=".........""~ ~ =¡;)( (S1g) "25-7"S;; .! soo W"C"Õ"::':: =~, " ~~.¡('\~ \ '-'-'~~=~w-,."\""~. ...~, '\ " ,~, ',' --"If.,."., s....,,"'-'.. ... """"~, ~, ~ '.<.- . l~~. :>:,,;~ j "'-, , , .,-,-: ~: '~~.é~:)/ @ Gë!JRG£H.W~TERs ~ flY II; '.- ,-' ,'.". . ~ CUlYF."""G>!T I U ) r---=:-=~ --- '-'1 ~ December 28, 1999 1;; ;; -""""",,-,DwoN ; ~ :... SE=- ' 'I' L - Edali Olivo-Gomez - ?~,~,.'1t;;"iG City of Chula Vista Planning Department 275 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Subject WATERAVAlLAB1UTY PROPOSED FOOD MART & CAR WASH 3733 MAIN STREET CASE NO: 1S-O0-14, DRC-OD-42. PCC-OO-25 SWA Gen. File: Water Availability, 1999 Dear Ms. Olivo-Gomez: This letter is in -response to notices of an Initial Study, Design Review ApplicaTIon and Conditional Use Pennit Application for the subject project within the Sweetwater - - AuthQ,~seDlica..aŒa-Jbere is a 5-inGh water mainiocated on,the eašÍ sjde'of-Mace .. =-~- --streeranaãï'lB=îifcn watermah located on the north side of Main Street adjacent!Q.J~~ --=--.1?t-Pp)serf deyelo;unsnt. o.ur..recomS..j¡:¡dicat~:that1iJere""2rn-rwo-water seiVíëëS ro this ' -properiy. Enclosed is" c::mY:¡T 1i.1.8EC. 23-3-;:-,=:; ::;.=: s:;:;ws :~,= =xis,;¡-,; W.=:=; ~.=::i;¡:i=S. Þ. private developer paid Tor upgrades to thB ;~;utha~'ity's water system in 1993. There is an agreement between Sweetwater Authority and th=-developeT that witl reqiJïfe the - owner of this proposed project to pay $2.240.14 to the Authority prior to providing wat=r service to this parcel. At this TIme, we cannot comment on the adequacy of the existing system to Drovide fire protection fOT this project. The Owner must submit a leIT=r to the Authority from the appropriate fire agency stating fire flow requirements. Based on this requirement, the Authority wjJ detennine if there is â need for new water systems or substantial al.teration to the existing water system. The Authority recommends that your Agency work with ours to -determine if the existing water facilities are adequate to meet the -added demands pnor toîssuing a building pennit. ~3 -1 Public f1'í:z:,~ ArT~,,[v Se-r-.;ing Natio1Ul.I City, Chula Vi.sta ~mi Su7TDuna'ing Areas 02-.2' - ~ p- ..__JTll- City of Chula VISta Planning Department Attn: Ms. Edali OJivo-Gomez De::ember 28, í 999 Page two - . . . . If the :Owner pròvidesthe required me Tiow information ~nd enters into ~h agreement for waterfa.Clli1y improvements with the Authority, water service can be obtained at a pressure ranging from a maximum of 90 p.s.Î. to a minimum of 80 p.s.Î. . If you have anY.questions,pleaseronfact Mr, Russell ColJinsat422.:B395; exl: 639. Very truly yours, SWEETWATER AUTHORITY It _011. ,}J--.l--.O,;thl.....-;.. ~ ~~"'ZD~/ T. I J"mes L. Smyt:-: " '. .. \ ,,_. ~ Chief Engineer - enclosure: photocopyot 1/4 SEC. -?3-B map ~~-~'i~::;., ~~~... ~-~.;.~= . -"" - - ~- - ~ -Mr. -St€vê-Po~er - ~ . L;ny of-Ghula Vista Planning Department 2ì6 Fourth Avenue ChuJa Vista, CA 91910 s-y -- .2 - .2..1 - - ~.."" ';'.'F'-~ .-._,"..i>.'- . .' ,.., . f . ' , .fì"""'1 " ,..~"""... í!!!¡';::.'~,?~:..I~" --~.' . ;¡" ~~-""'" j . -:-. -'. " .,¥"hOì- ~;. ..~............' ..' <..I.'[).".-.' ~.' tP"..I-..~ . '. Cì ~ i" '. ~- -- ----- -- -_!. ~--~ ~ :"'1 '." ,. . ;)~ - :0:: ,. ..' f: - : L? PRoj.éc~SlïE -; . ',:. '.:~-§ --_w', ~-~BRI1TOO- ~~- .'. - - - ;~~.~-== " ,e" ",...,. , ,~ ,,',' ',',., !l¡:\}S~-I' .'- ~~I""" --" -,-:,;¡; iJji-_- sr ~ ¡ ----- -- cJ. - ¿o--- - RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADOPTING NEGATIVE DECLARATION IS-00-14 AND APPROVING OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT WITH THE WITH WORLDWIDE PETROLEUM COMPANY FOR THE DEVELOPMENT OF A GAS STATION WITH ASSOCIATED FAST FOOD RESTAURANT, CAR WASH, AND FOOD MART LOCATED AT 3733 MAIN STREET, WITHIN THE SOUTHWEST REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA WHEREAS, the Worldwide Petroleum Campany awns the praperty at the southeast corner ot Main Street and Mace Street, which is diagrammatically shawn in the Locator Map attached ta the Owner Participation Agreement and incorporated herein by reference; and, WHEREAS, the Warldwide Petroleum Campany has presented development plans for the canstructian of a gas statlan with associated fast foad restaurant, car wash, food mart, and associated site and off-site improvements located at 3733 Main Street ("Project"); and WHEREAS, the site far the proposed Project is lacated within the Sauthwest Redevelopment Project Area under the jurisdictian and cantrol af the Redevelopment Agency af the City af Chula Vista; and, WHEREAS, the City's Cammunity Develapment Department Pianning and Enviranmental Manager reviewed the praposed Praject and issued Mitigated Negative Declaratian IS-00-14 far the Praject in accardance with CEOA; and, WHEREAS, a notice of determinatian far the project was prepared and distributed in accardance with the requirements af CEOA (Public Resources Code Sectian 21092.3); and, WHEREAS, the Design Review Committee and the Planning Commission reviewed and recammended that the Redevelapment Agency approve the proposed Praject subject to the canditians listed in Exhibit B of the Owner Participatian Agreement; and, WHEREAS, the Redevelapment Agency af the City of Chula Vista has been presented an Owner Participatian Agreement, said agreement being an file in the Office of the Secretary to the Redevelapment Agency and known as document RACO 00-11, appravlng the construction af the Project located at the sautheast corner of Main Street and Mace Street, depicted in Exhibit A and subject ta conditions listed in Exhibits B af said agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA daes hereby find, arder, determine and resolve as follaws: 1. Based upan its independent consideration of the project and all written and aral testimany presented, the prapased project will not have a significant impact an the envlranment; accardingly Mitigated Negative declaratian IS-00-14 was prepared and is hereby adapted in accardance with CEOA. 2. The prapased praject is consistent with the Sauthwest Redevelapment Plan and shall implement the purpose thereaf; the praject shall assist with the eliminatian af blight in the Project Area. 3. The Redevelopment Agency af the City af Chula Vista hereby appraves the Owner Participation Agreement with the Warldwide Petroleum Company for the construction ot a gas station with associated fast faad restaurant, car wash and faad mart lacated at 3733 Main Street, within the 02-.3( - ~ Southwest Redevelapment Praject Area in accardance with plans attached thereta as Exhibit A and subject ta canditians listed in Exhibits B af said agreement 4. The Chairman of the Redevelapment Agency is hereby authorized to execute the subject Owner Participation Agreement between the Redevelopment Agency and the Worldwide Petroleum Company. 5. The Secretary of the Redevelapment Agency Is autharized and directed ta recard said Owner Participatlan Agreement in the Office af the County Recarder of San Diega, Califarnia. Presented by: Approved as ta term by: Chris Salomone Cammunity Develapment Directar .)-.J-'- - - ATTACHMENT 1 Design Review Committee DRAFT Minutes -3- May 1.2000 asked if the weather was a concern. Mr. Foster indicated that is why one lane is covered. Chair Aguilar asked Mr. Faster if the color of the black was being changed. Mr. Foster responded in the affinnative. MSC (AlberdilMorlon) to approve DRC-99-34 as presented. Vote: (4-0-0.1) with Araiza absent. F. PUBLIC HEARING 2. DRC-00-42 W orldwidePetroleum 3733 Main Street Consideration of approval of a new 24-hour gas station with associated food mart and car wash to be canstructed on a vacant parcel Staff Presentation Mr. Steve Power (Associate Planner) indicated that this is a gas station at the southeast comer of Mace and Main Streets associated with a food mart and a drive-thru fast food area as well as a car wash facility. The project site is a 67,700 square foot vacant parcel. He passed around photagraphs afthe site. The site plan calls for two driveway entrances on each street: Main and Mace Streets. The more notable features of the site plan include a 15-foot wide landscape buffer alang Main Street and a 1O.foot wide landscape buffer along Mace Street. These are both required pursuant to the Montgamery Specific Plan, which this project is in. The project is also in the Southwest Redevelopment Area. The plan includes a 9- foot high concrete block wall, which drops down to 6 feet. The wall is particularly important because there is an existing residence on the site, which also has a junkyard an it. There will be a drive-thru restaurant operation with a speaker ~ board with people going thraugh at all hours, and the wall wauld help to screen the potential noise impact upon this residence. A noise study was completed as part of the applicants' environmental review of the project. The noise study faund that there would be no adverse noise impact associated with the drive-thru partion of the project. A landscape buffer is going around the southern and eastern property lines. The elevations call far earth tone colors. All structures would be architectura1ly integrated in tenns of materials, colors, style, stucco exterior, red clay barrel tile roofing and tile insets. The City Landscape Planner detennined that the landscape has met the landscape requirements. The only issue staff had raised with regard to the signage is the proposed pole sign at the narthwestern corner of the parcel. The Design Guidelines discourage the use of pole signs. Overall, staff feels .this is a good project. The Design Review Committees' action wauld be advisory to the City Council because this is in a redevelopment area. The project wauld also go to the Planning Commissian for a use aspect. The gas 02 -33 - .. Design Review Committee DRAFT Minutes - 4 - Mav 1.2000 station requires a SUP in this case because it is in the redevelopment area. Staff has recommended approval. Member Alberdi asked if the square footage of the signage on the building was within the requirement Mr. Pawer responded in the affirmative. Applicant Presentation Mr. Bob Faudoa (Gary Engineering, 4901 Morena Boulevard, Suite 304, San Diego, CA 92117) did not have a presentation, but he would answer any questions the DRC may have. Chair Aguilar asked if the applicant was all right with the conditions outlined in the staff report? Mr. Faudoa respanded in the affirmative. The autstanding issue is the two pole signs getting approved for this project. Committee DiscussionJRecommendations Chair Aguilar thought this was a great project and an asset to the area. What are the materials of the canopies? Mr. Faudoa indicated that it is called a touch coat finish, which is textured paint that looks like plaster. As far as the building, it will be a sand-type finish. Chair Aguilar indicated that her ouly concern was the pole sign. That is the major issue. The Chula Vista Design Guidelines strangly recommend no pole signs. Mr. Faudoa could understand DRC being hesitant to approve a pole sign if it were in the middle of downtown Chula Vista, but this was in an outlying area where there is a precedent for pole signs. Chair Aguilar stated that it makes it difficult for the DRC because they recognize there are pole signs. Especially in that area, there are lots and lots of pole signs. This pole sign is probably going to be more attractive than most of the pole signs that are out there. Nevertheless, what the DRC would like for the City to do is slowly get rid of pole signs. The Guidelines strongly discourage them, and the DRC supports those guidelines. But what happens is, applicants come to the DRC with photagraphs showing that everybody up and down the street has got pale signs, so why shouldn't they have one. It is a bit of a dilemma for the DRc. She had been thinking a lot about this, especially after the last meeting on the bay ttont project. Maybe it was time for the DRC to take a position on this and just say, no more pale signs, no place, na how, nowhere. Member Alberdi indicated that, unfortunately, some projects that do not come through the DRC are allowed pole signs. Planning approves them administratively. Mr. Faudaa indicated that there is signage on the canopies, 02-.jC¡ - - DRAFT Dešign Review Committee Minutes - 5 - Mav 1.2000 which will be 25 feet above grade. The pole signage is important identification for the project. Member Alberdi indicated that there are a lot af monument signs with gas stations on 'E' Street and Third A venue. Vice-Chair Morlon indicated that there is a lot of traffic on Main Street, and the canopy is going to be 25 feet up in the air. That is going to be acting as a pretty good billboard. Mr. Faudaa indicated that it would not because there is not enough fascia. Would the DRC consider reducing the scope of the signage? Mr. AIi Amani (President of Worldwide Petroleum Corporation, 1768 EI Paso Real, La Jolla, CA 92037) indicated that the canopy was only going to represent one product, which is the gasaline. The pole sign was gaing to show the other products being offered to the public (food and car wash). The speed of the peaple on Main Street is very high. The applicant wants the driver to know fTom a very far distance to warn them to make up their mind what this is going ta offer. Otherwise, they are going to pass. It is typical of this type business based on studies and on the kind of store. Member Alberdi could see it from a business point of view. But fTom a DRC point of view, he had to worry about the design. He wauld go for a monumental sign and would strongly discourage a pole sign. Mr. Amani indicated that the other areas have a lower speed limit or the traffic is compact. If a pole sign is standing in fTont of that mass an the comer of Mace and Main, you can see at high speed as yau are passing. The applicant would like ta get the attention of drivers at least I mile before they are going to pass. He stressed that it is very critical for the oil corparation. Maybe there is a way to compromise. Chair Aguilar reminded everyone that this particular project is in a redevelopment area. All the DRC was doing was advising the Redevelopment Agency. The project is going to them, and they will be making the decision. The DRC's role here is ta give them whatever advise we feel is appropriate. Member Mestler concUITed with the monument sign. Member Alberdi asked how the architect was going to handle the water splashing into the stucca? Mr. Faudoa indicated that the tile is set back about 6 inches and then there is a built in gutter. Member Alberdi indicated that was a main concern because the DRC does not want the building to discalor. It is important in the long-term ta have a goad design. His concern was that the overhangs on the tower are designed in such a way where the water will not splash onto a stub. Whether that is a gutter or an overhang is up to the architect. 02 -.:J~ .. .. DRAFT Dèsign Review Cammittee Minutes - 6 - May 1,2000 Mr. Faudoa asked what the limitations are on the monument sign? He was worried about the window of visibility on that carner. That is something he would have to think about and talk over with Mr. Power. MSC (AguilarlMestler) to approve DRC-00-42 with all the Conditions of Approval included the staff repart. Add Condition #20: That the pole sign in the propasal be replaced with a monument sign. The monument sign would be subject to staff approval so it would nat have to come back to the Committee. Add Condition #21: That the overhangs of the building, towers and walkway are designed in such a way where the water does not run to the face of the stucco. Vote: (4-0-0-1) with Araiza absent. G. STAFF COMMENTS: Cancellation of June 19, 2000 meeting. Ms. Blessent stated that June 19,2000 is the Ken Lee Memorial Golf Toumament. That meeting mayor may not be rescheduled depending on the worklaad. H. MEMBER COMMENTS ChaIT Aguilar had concerns regarding pole sign regulatians on the bay ITont and pole signs in generaL These concerns were discussed at length, Vice-Chair Morlon inquired abaut the County building sign. Mr. Sandoval indicated that staff is working with the County on that sign. I. ADJOURNMENT The meeting was adjoumed at 5:35 p.m. to a regular meeting on Monday, May 15,2000, at 4:30 p.m. in Conference Rooms 2& 3. Prepared by: ~/æ/~L- Linda Bond, Recorder (k\lIbIDRC1999\drcO50 1 OO.mins.doc) 02 -~, - - ATTACHMENT 2 RESOURCE CONSERVATION COMMISSION MINUTES APRIL 17,2000 Public Services Building DRAFT Conference Room 1 CALLING MEETING TO ORDER: Chairperson Burrascano called the meeting to order at 6:50 p.m. RCC MEMBERS PRESENT: Chair Cindy Burrascano Mr. Charles Bull Ms. Theresa Thomas Mr. Juan Diaz MEMBERS ABSENT: Mr. Robert Fisher Ms. Viviane Marquez A motion was made by Commissioner Bull to excuse the absent Commissioners. The mation was seconded by Cammissioner Thomas and passed unanimously. GUESTS PRESENT: Mr. Bill Behum representing the Chula Vista Community Church Mr. Javier Fadoa representing the Chula Vista Faod Mart & Car Wash Mr. Ted Marioncelli, JM Consulting Graup, Inc. STAFF PRESENT; Marilyn Ponseggi, Environmental Review Coordinator Benjamin Guerrero, Environmental Project Manager Leilani Warren, Recording Secretary APPROVAL OF MINUTES: April 3, 2000 The minutes of April 3, 2000 were discussed. Cammissioner Thomas asked for two corrections. The first is to correct the spelling af Commission Bull's name an page 3.**. The second correction on Page 2,to add a statement ** as part of the motion on Rolling Hills Ranch, IS-OO- OS, that the Commissianers were concerned about traffic congestion and an increase in accidents at the intersection adjacent to the I-80S Freeway. A motion was made by Commissioner Thomas to approve the minutes with carrections. The motion was seconded by Cammissioner Bull and passed by a unanimous vote. Commissioner Burrascano requested that in the future all motions be recorded in the minutes whether seconded or not approved. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: None .2-.3'1 - - OLD BUSINESS: None DRAFT NEW BUSINESS: 1. Review of Negative Declaration IS-00-21, Chula Vista Community Church Ms. Ponseggi presented an overview of the project. Although there were concerns raised by neighbors, they are of a nuisance nature not environmental. The commission discussed the Negative Declaration at length. Ms Ponseggi assured the commission that if the noise exceeded the City's noise standard then it would be considered a significant impact and it would be necessary to mitigate. Commissioner Thamas made a motian to accept the Negative Declaration as presented. The motion was seconded by Commissioner Bull and passed unanimously. 2. Review Mitigated Declaration IS-00-18, PCS Sprint antenna at SDG&E transmission Line Corridor at the end of Sesame Street. Ms. Panseggi presented an overview of the project. Theanteuna is proposed to be attached to an existing SDG&E tower at the tap of a slope surrounded by Diegan coastal sage scrub.. There is an existing access road. The actual construction area and access road are completely devoid of any kind of vegetation. A variety of mitigation measures have been included to protect the sensitive species Commissioner Thomas voiced concern that signs or colors af an obtrusive nature could be installed at a later date. Ms Ponseggi assured the commission that no changes could be made to the project without being approved. Commissianer Thomas made a motian to approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration to include that if a Whisperwatt power generator were ever needed, a liner would be utilized to prevent any fuel spillage that could impact the wildlife or the water. Commissioner Bull seconded the motion and it was passed unanimously. 3. Review of Mitigated Negative Declaration IS-00-14, Chula Vista food Mart & Car Wash. Mr. Benjamin Guerrero reviewed the proposal for a proposed fueling statian, a convenience faod mart, drive-thru restaurant and an express car wash. Studies far noise and traffic impact were done and it was deteITllined to have no significant impact on the surraunding area and further mitigation would not be required. The Environmental Consultants for the subject site recommends limited soil sampling and laboratory analyses to investigate the potential presence of toxic pollution due to the fact that this site was a foITllerly used as an auta wrecking yard. The Commissian discussed the project at length. Commissioner Bull suggested that for future reference when there is a noise study done and there is a carwash on the property the commission feels the noise from a carwash should be a part ofthe study. 2 02 -.ai" - - DRAFT Commissioner Thomas was concerned about the vapor control monitaring and that the storage tanks were double layer liners. Mr. Fedora stated that after 1998 the State of California required double lined tanks and piping and computerized sensors to detect any leaking in the tanks. He also stated that the Air Pollution Cantrol cantrols the monitoring of the vapor. Commissioner Bull made a motion to approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration with the following recommendations: (1) a reference to the noise from the carwash be a part of the noise study and it's impact to the sensitive receptor and (2) that a more detailed statement be put in the mitigation measure should toxic materials be discovered in the soil when grading, and if at all possible testing results be available and incorporated in the Neg. Dec. prior to going to Council. Commissioner Burrascana seconded the motion and it was passed unanimously Mr. Fedora asked the Commission if it would be necessary to have another soil report done since the last one was done in 1981 and there have been no significant changes. The RCC thought it necessary to have another report done because of updated standards and methods in place since 1981. 4. Review of Mitigated Negative Declaration IS-OO-13, Jack In The Box/Gasoline Sales/ Mini Mart Mr. Ben Guerrero reviewed the MND project, which consists of a construction of a drive-thru restaurant, a gasoline service station and convenience grocery store. There was a traffic study done for the project the results of that study indicates that there were no adverse impacts to the surrounding intersections. The traffic study also looked at the an-site circulation and indicates that based on the location of the underground tanks the refueling would not interfere with customers approaching the site far business purposes. There was also soils report by the soils engineer indicating that there were standard recommendatians and no mitigation is required. The Commission voiced a cancern of pollution generated from the gas station going into the stonn drainage system. The applicant is required to implement the Best Management practices to prevent pollution of stann drainage systems. A motion was made by Commissianer Diaz to approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration. Commissioner Bull seconded the motion. The motion was approved unanimously. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COORDINATOR'S COMMENTS: The Beautification Awards on May 5, 2000 has been changed ta May 23, 2000 due to the fact that the recipient, Daug Reid, will be out of town. It is possible that the RCC will not be meeting an May I, 2000 because of lack af items for the agenda but Ms. Ponseggi but she will notify everyone in advance. 3 .2 -~ 'I - - DRAFT There is an RCC applicant that is ready for approval and will probably an the Council agenda for their first meeting held in May. There is a possibility of a second candidate ready for approval for that same meeting. CHAIRMAN'S COMMENTS: Commissioner BulTascano stated that she was uncomfartable in approving any projects when there is a level D surface. She would like the city council to direct someone to reexamine what the standards are for the City of Chula Vista she feels that if there is a Level D, there shauld some mitigation. Ms. Ponseggi stated that the autharity the ordinance gives the RCC is to loak at enviranmental documentation for its adequacy. If anyane wishes ta be involved in the growth management you need to make a motion ta ask the city council to change the ordinance for growth management to include RCC as part of the process. Commissioner Bull suggested that if there is a Phase I audit that indicates there is a potential for hazardous material at a site, environmental documentatian will be better served if limited testing or some more specificity was included in the environmental review. It makes for a stronger document. COMMISSIONERS'S COMMENTS: None ADJOURNMENT: The meeting adjourned at 8:00 p.m. to a regularly scheduled meeting on Monday, May 1,2000, at 6:30 p.m. in Conference Room #1. Respectfully submitted, Leilani WalTen Recording Secretary 4 02-c/O - - ATTACHMENT 3 MINUTES OF THE CITY PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA May 24, 2000 Council Chambers 6:00 p.m. Public Services Building Wednesday, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista ROLL CAW MOTIONS TO EXCUSE: Present: Chair Willett, Commissioners Castaneda, Hall, Ray, Thomas, Cortes, and O'Neill Staff Present: Steve Power, Associate Planner Jim Sandoval, Assistant Director of Planning and Building Ann Moore, Assistant City Attarney PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE/SILENT PRAYER INTRODUCTORY REMARKS: Read into the re;ord by Chair Willett ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: No public input. 1. PUBLIC HEARING: SUPS-00-05; Adoption of the resolution recommending that the City of Chula Vista Redevelopment Agency approve the construction of an automobile service station with associated mini-mart and car wash located at 3733 Main Street in the Southwest Redevelopment Area and the limited Industrial (Il) Zone. Background: Steve Power, Associate Planner reported that the proposed project is located in the northeastern corner of Mace and Main Street in Chu/a Vista. The Resource Conservation Commission reviewed the project on April 17,2000 and approved the Mitigated Negative Declaration. The RCC expressed concern that there were issues related to mitigation measures for potential hazardous waste on site and the Commission felt that Phase 2 soils testing needed to be performed prior to consideration of the MND by the Redevelopment Agency. The project Engineer has stated that since the RCC's review of the project, the Phase 2 soils testing has been completed and no significant findings were made as a result of the study. On May 1, 2000 the Design Review Committee approved the project and indicated that it was a well-designed project that would greatly enhance the area, however, they recommended that the Redevelopment Agency recommend that a monument sign be installed as opposed to a pylong (pale) sign, which is what the applicant is proposing. The project site is a vacant lot measuring 67,700 sf and the surrounding uses are Industrial and Commercial. The project would include the construction af sidewalk, curb and gutter along ~... c/, - "' Planning Commission Minutes - 2 - February 24,1999 Mace and Main Streets. There is one residence abutting the site and no opposition from homeowner has been received. A proposed drive -thru for a fast food restaurant would be located in close proximity to the residence, therefore staff was concerned with the noise impacts, however, as part of the environmental review, a noise study was conducted that it concluded that there were no adverse noise impacts with the drive-thru and speaker board because the residence would be located approximately 20 feet away and there would be a 9 foot high block wall that would serve to attenuate the noise. The project consists of a fueling facility, with an associated mini-mart/restaurant, and car wash. The main service area would be located to the north of the site and would consist of two canopied dispensing areas, one for automobiles at an 8 pump island, and the second area for trucks dispensing diesel fuel at a 6 pump island. There would be ingress and egress from both Mace and Main Streets, and on-site improvements include landscaping surrounding the property as approved by the City's Landscape Planner and consistent with the Landscape Manual and there would be a total of 32 parking spaces on site, which is also consistent with parking requirements. Two letters in opposition to the project were received stating concern with traffic circulation and one letter in particular addressed concerns with trucks parking and blocking traffic on both Mace and Main Streets. These letters were referred to the City Traffic Engineer who did not express the same concerns. Staff Recommendation: That the Planning Commission recommend that the Redevelopment Agency approve the project as submitted to the Planning Commission and approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration as it will be amended to include the results of a Phase 2 environmental study. Commission Discussion: Commissioner Thomas asked if staff could elaborate on the Traffic Engineer's position with regard to Mr. Breedlove's letter addressing his concern with trucks parking in front of his business. Assistant Director Sandoval responded that the letter was forwarded to the Traffic Engineer for review and comments, and although he did not address any specific concerns with the truck parking issue, if the Commission feel comfartable moving forward with the praject, you could condition it so that staff would revisit these issues and to see if any modification is needed. Commissioner O'Neill stated that he hoped the prominent liquor sign as depicted in the site plan was simply to indicate that a sign would be installed at that location and not the actual intended sign for that locatian. Additionally, Commissioner O'Neill expressed concern and stated that the confined area on site is not conducive ta efficient interior traffic flow as well as the exterior on Mace and Main Streets for big rigs. 02-'1;.... - - Planning Commission Minutes - 3 - February 24, 1999 Commissioner Cortes inquired if there would be a center divider on Main Street as part of the street improvements. Steve Power responded that the required public improvement on Main Street would be a widening of the street, sidewalk, curb and gutter. Commissioner Thomas stated he shared Commissioner O'Neill's concerns with the traffic flow and vehicular queuing. Additionally, Cmr. Thomas asked for further clarification on drainage and excess run-off water from the car wash. Mr. Power responded that the water from the car wash would be recycled, however, he deferred to the project engineer for further details on the system and mechanics of the car wash. Commissioner Castaneda stated that he shares Cmr. Cortes' comments on the installation of a median on Main Street, and indicated that there is merit in further consideration of it in order to avoid the same situation that has been created along Third Avenue where center dividers are being installed after the fact. Cmr. Castaneda stated that Main Street is an east/west corridor and inquired if there is any specific landscape theme designated for Main Street. Cmr. Castaneda asked if there are conditions for this project that would require the applicant to adhere to on site maintenance and landscaping maintenance. Mr. Power indicated that the Montgomery Area Specific Plan required that there be a 15 foot wide landscape median, however, he is nat aware of any specific type of vegetation or uniform these that is required. Ann Moore, Assistant City Attorney responded that it is a common provision that is found in Special Use Permits, which delineates landscape maintenance requirements in accordance with the landscaping plans approved by the City. Chair Willett stated he shared the same concerns already raised by other Commissioners with regard to traffic circulation, stacking, on-site and landscape maintenance. Chair Willett also pointed out that the setback distance (3 feet) along the east and south side of the property line is probably too small ta accommadate planting trees and recommended that be looked into to allow at least a 5 foot landscape buffer. Public Hearing Opened 6:45 Bob Faudoa, 4901 Morena Blvd. #304, San Diego, CA, applicant, addressed the concerned raised by the Commission. He indicated that the fueling facility is envisianed to serve the area's small truck fleets with diesel fuel and not the large semi-trucks and they will find that the confined space for maneuvering will be a deterrent ta their continued patronage of the facilities. With regard to traffic circulation and the complaint raised regarding trucks parking on the street, the applicant has been working the City Traffic Engineer and the reasan why the trucks presently 0) - </.1 - - Planning Commission Minutes - 4 - February 24, 1999 park there is because there are no parking restrictions since there are no existing street improvements or parking requirements posted on the premises, therefore, when the street improvements, sidewalk and curbs are installed, there are ways to prohibit parking at that location and the problem will be eliminated. The proposed car wash will process and recycle approximately 95% of the water, the reason its not 100% is because there is minimal amount of vehicle carry-off water. All ADA requirements will be met for parking, ramp access, and restrooms. The applicant is in discussions with City Engineer staff and is proposing installing a traffic signal at the corner of Mace and Main Street at the applicants expense, however, this would be in lieu of the City waiving some traffic impact fees that are being imposed on the project. The applicant will be working with the Redevelopment Agency on a signage program. At the time that the application was submitted to the Planning Department, the tenants (oil company and restaurant company) was unknown. Those companies have been secured, therefore, a signage packet will be designed. With regard to the east and south side setbacks, the applicant is proposing to have a 6 foot high masonry wall on the east side property line and a 9 foot wall on the south to help mitigate any noise impacts from the drive-thru restaurant order board, both sides having a 3 foot landscaping buffer which would contain vines to cover the walls. The applicant expressed no concerns with regard to an-site and landscaping maintenance because he reaffirmed that it is the owners best interest to upkeep and care for his investment. The car wash is of masonry construction and will have what is called a "striper" , which is the blower at the end of the car wash that strips the water off just before the vehicle exits the car wash. Commissioner O'Neill asked if there would be any vacuum stands in front of the car wash. Mr., Faudoa stated that although the plans do not show vacuum statians, there will probably be a couple of them located in front of the car wash. Mr. Faudoa stated that he will be working closely with the Police Department to ensure that all requirements for the sale of alcohol are met. Commissioner Hall asked if there is any potential ground pollution associated with the project. Mr. Faudoa stated that there is virtually no possible potential ground pollution because of the regulatory agency requirements imposed on fueling facilities, which are the strictest in the State of California, and especially in San Diego County. The underground fuel tanks are double wall steel and have sensors under each dispensor. Steve Palma, a neighboring resident stated that he was at the meeting to affer this project his ol - </'1 - - Planning Commission Minutes - 5 - February 24,1999 support and to whole-heartedly welcome it to the area. The project will be a good complement to the newly built Otay Recreation Center. Commission Castaneda reaffirmed that Mr. Palma raised an important issue with regard to the rec. center being a neighbor and the need for the City Traffic Engineer to take a very close look at providing a safe way for the patrons (especially chi Idren) of the recreation center to cross over and patranize the proposed facility. MSC (Castaneda/Thomas) (7.0-0-0) that the Planning Cammission adopt resolution recommending that the City of Chula Vista Redevelopment Agency approve the construction of an automobile service station with associated mini-mart, fast food and car wash located at 3733 Main Street in the Southwest Redevelopment Area with the following recommendations: . That further consideration be given to the possibility of installing a median on Main Street as well as enhanced traffic control for pedestrian crossing at the intersection of Mace and Main Streets, . That specification be given as to where the vacuums for the car wash will be located, . That enhanced measures for removing excess water on the vehicles exiting the car wash be provided, . That a condition be included specifying requirements for landscaping, signage and on- site maintenance, . That the signage conform to the sign ordinance and any redevelopment design guidelines and goals envisioned for that area. The signage should be consistent with other new developments which do not include pole signs. . That landscaping and street improvements be consistent with the long term objectives of the Montgomery Redevelopment Area Plan with respect to street landscape design and traffic control measures . That a condition be included stating that the car wash will have a "striper" (air-blower . That the hours of operation be clearly defined in the conditions of approval, and . That prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for new structures all State, Federal and local permits will have been received as required by that particular law or regulation. Motion carried. DIRECTOR'S REPORT: COMMISSIONERS COMMENTS: ADJOURNMENT at 7:45 p.m. to the Planning Commission meeting of June 7, 2000. Diana Vargas, Secretary to Planning Commission ol-4S- - - ATTACHMENT 4 GARY ENGINEERING, INC. 4901 Morena 8lvd. . Suite 304 . San Diego. California 92117 Telephone (619) 483.0620 . FAX (619) 483.2943 E-mail: GaryengCA@aol.com Mr. Miguel Z. Tapia May 26,2000 Senior Community Development Specialist VIA FAX (619) 476-5310 CITY OFCHULA VISTA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, California 91910 SUBJECT: PROPOSED SERVICE STATION / CAR WASH FACILITY 3733 Main Street & Mace Street Chula Vista, Califarnia 91911 RE: SUP-00-05 ReQuest for aDDroval of a 30'-0" hi!!h two-Dole si!!n Dear Mr. Tapia Mr. Ali Amani, DBA Worldwide Petroleum Company is proposing to construct a two-million dollar service statian facility and associated appurtenances at 3733 Main Street in the Sauthwest Redevelopment Area and the Limited Industrial (IL) Zane. This letter is to request from the Cammunity Development Department approval of the installation of a 30'-0" high, two-pole (pylon) identification sign. Project was conditianally approved by the Design Review Cammittee on May I, 2000 with the recommendation that a monument price sign be installed in lieu of the proposed 30'-0" high pylon sign. Planning Commission conditionally approved the project on March 25,2000 with the recommendation our sign be compatible with what is installed in the area (Industrial Zone). Our appeal to the Community Development Department to apprave the proposed sign is based on the following justifications: 1- The project site consists of a 67,700 square-faot vacant parcel that is bordered by cammercial- industrial area. The Engineering Dept. has requested we provide impravement plans to widen Main Street to the 53 foot half of the street right-of-way with an 8 foot sidewalk and a 15 foot landscaping set-back. The site to the west afthe subject property has no air-site develapment or landscaping improvements. Proposed pole sign would be installed at 5 feet from the property line. Any ground-based signage installed on the carner of the property will not be visible to east-bound traffic on Main Street due to the business practices at 3679 Main Street (Economy Upholstery). Parking and automobiles being worked-on will obstruct any and all ground signage. Economy Upholstery is on the southwest corner of Main and Mace. We have enclosed a site plan showing the adjacent properties and the location of the proposed pole sign and the existing pole signs. MEMBER OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVil ENGINEERS ~-4~ . - Mr. Miguel Z. Tapia May 25, 2000 Page 2 of2 2- Currently existing within 300' feet of the subject site are three pole signs averaging thirty to thirty five feet in height. The Industrial (IL) Zone (Sign Code 19.44.060) allows a freestanding pale up to thirty-five in height. We have enclosed an exhibit with photographs showing the proposed and existing pole signs. 3- Current speed limit an Main Street is 40 miles-per-hour. Having a pale sign will alert traffic of aur facility and allow them to slow down to enter the facility ar warn them oftraffic exiting the facility. The intersection of Main and Mace is not signalized. althaugh we are preparing feasibility studies on the installation of one. 4- The Department of Weights and Measures require we display price signs that are clearly visible from each street of the intersection. Due to the speed limit and the restricted sight lines to the project, a ground based sign would incur sign violations and passible fines to Mr. Amani. We have attached sign requirements from the Department of Weights and Measures for your reference. It is vital to the community and Mr. Amani that this facility succeeds when it opens, due in part to the extensive investment of Mr. Amani, and the capital needed to suppart the project for the first year. A pole sign advertizing the many services we have to have offer will be critical for this project ta thrive and provide the necessary revenue to Mr. Amani, and in part to the City ofChula Vista. In short, a monument sign will not serve the needs of this project. We are prepared to submit any additional exhibits, phatographs, documents, etc., and attend any necessary meetings needed to support our position. We hope the Community Development Department will support our request for the proposed sign and make this a productive business for our client and the City ofChula Vista. If you need any additional information please da not hesitate to call me at (858) 483-0620. Sincerely, ~GINEERING, IN . ~Ywoa: Project Manager (1) Mounted Exhibit (I) Sign Ordinance 19.44.060 (1) Site Plan Exhibit (1) Dept. of Weights and Measures 13531 cc: A. Amani, Worldwide Petroleum Company dJ-t/7 - - 141 001 THU OB: 36 FAX 619 476 5310 CHl! LA VI STA cm!!!. DEVEL. OS/25/00 ,.', é. V, ZvV'-'~ì é)~ ..{i,~~~ 4. Turpentine, matches, paint and orher combusrible materi¡¡Js, Ic./' ß£ 5. Stockyards, slaughterhouses and rendering pJants, 6. The storage of fireworks or explosives, 7. Industrial metal, waste rag, glass or paper salvage operations and sJag piIes, .' 8. Fish, sauerkraut, vinegar and similar Uses, '" ~: 9. Brewing or distilling of liquors or perfume manufacturing; f~ B. The foI/owing processes: Nitrating of Carton or orher materi¡¡Js; foundries; reducrian, refining, smelring, allaying, rolling, drawing and eXtruding of metal or metal ores; refll1ing of petroleum products; disrillarion of wood or bones; storage, cllring or tanning of raw, green or salted hides or ì -; "" "om .olm. '; c, ""YO~u~.whkh I. d"~,,.d hy~. """""'" ,. h. o¡~. ,...'" "'=",,~.. "'ow ~~ . (Ord. 1281 §1 (Part), 1970; Ord. 1212 §] (Part), 1969; prior code §33.5J3(E». WI ~OO) ~;~~~, Iii See Sections 19.60.020 and 19.60.030 for permit requirement and approval procedlll'e. :1 A Types of signs allowed: Business (walJ and/or marquee and a freestanding sign) subject to rhe oil following: °- 1, Wall and/or marquee: Each business shall be allowed a combined sign area of one square foot per lineal foot of bUilding fromage facing a dedicated street or alley; however, rhe sign area may be increased to a maximum of three square feet per lineal foot of bUilding frontage provided rhat rhe sign does not exceed ftfry percent of rhe background area on which rhe sign is applied as set forth in Secrion 19.60.250. Each business shall also be allowed signs facing on.site parking areas for five cars or more and walkways ten feet or more in Widrh. Such signs shall be allowed an area of one square foot per lineal foot of building fromage facing said area; however, rhe area may be increased to two square feet per lineal foot of building fromage provided rhat rhe sign does not exceed ftfry percem of rhe background area on which rhe sign is appJied as set forth in Section 19.60.250. The maximum sign area shall not exceed one hundred square feet; 2. Freestanding (pole); Each Jot shall be allowed one freestanding sign subject to rhe following: I a. Signs are restricted to rhose Jots having a minimum fromage of one hundred feer on a dedicated Streer. In rhe case of comer lots only one frOntage shall be coumed, if b. The sign may contain one square foot of area for each lineal foot of street frontage but &halJ not exceed one hundred fifty square feer. In rhe Case of comer Jots or through Jars, I only rhe frontage rhe sign is oriemed to shall be counted toward rhe allowable sign area, c. Maximum height, rhirty.five feet, 02 - 41 .- .. o.!. Muúmum ground clearance, ei~hr feer - - I 8 I ~ 8 I ~ * ~i I þl!Ál 8 I!ÁI~ ~~ ~ . ~ t I M f i. í ¡.. ! II I 'II II I I ¡ 11111 ~ ~ I I -EÐ 8 ~ I ~S 8 ! t I ~ ¡ J¡ ~~ - If - -.L:aønloLS -I!EO~ ~ - - -- ~Oj) I I. il @15 I ~~. DCD I DCD 8 8 ~ ~ DCD § . " 8 I 8 t ti DCD IoT~ I DCD f" I,!I!I¡ jli!j DCD 8 ~~ I ~~ §§§§§ ~1!!ì<!J !/II hi þl!Ál ~~ I~@ ;1 ~~ !ur 111,1 I ~! sl!Ál ~~ I Þ :;j ~e¡;¡ -$- I I ~ ~R I .2.-4f . - - ".., .." mJ I c. The sign shaJJ not be pennitted to project inca the public right.of,way. ~I f. ", "" ,Ii'" mol",", , "'~o/.foo, ,,",,' "m 0" I""rim pmp"" Ii",. 1- g. Freescandi.ng pole signs less than eight feet in height are restricted to a maximum si¡:n , area of twelve square feet and shaJJ maintain a minimum setback of five feet from "JJ streets, I h. Omy~.,,~ .f~. oom,l.. ~d f", """ >.",>. ". ",. .f"" "'~, >."" mlY " be displayed on the sign. Where the pole sign is used to identify the name of the complex . or the major tenant. the sign shall be designed to identify aJJ proposed tenants up to the II maximum number allowed herein. The minimum sign area anocated for each tenant sha I . be not Jess than ten square feet; II) 3. Ground (monument): A low.profùe ground sign may be used in lieu of a freestanding pole sign. If' The sign shaJJ be subject to the foJJowing; [ a. Maximum height, eight feet, . b. Maximum sign area, fifry ~quare feet, E c. The sign shaJJ maintain a minimum setback of five feet from all streets and ten feet from . all interior property lines, ÐI: d. The sign struCture shaJJ be designed to be architecturaJJy compatible with the main ~, building and constructed with the same or similar materials, Where the pole sign is used to identify the name of the complex or the major tenant, the sign shaJJ be designed to ni identify all proposed tenants up to the maximum number aJJowed herein. The minimum V sign area allocated for each tenant shaJJ be not less than ten square feet, ,~ B. Other signs: See Chapter J9,60 for window (Section 19.60.270); canopy (Secrion 19.60.280): ~ temporary construction (Section 19.60.290); public and quasi.public (Secrian 19.60.310); drive.in '; theater marquee (Secrion 19.60.320); directional (Section 19.60,340); warning and instructional .. (Section 19,60.350); service sration price signs (Section 19.60,360); directory (Section 19,60.370); rea! estate (Section 19,60.380); unclassified Uses (Section 19.60.400); signs on mansard roofs (Section . 19.60.410); signs on pitched roofs (Section 19,60.420); business (Section 19,60.430); and signs on . architectural appendages (Section 19.60.440); ", , '.., M '~,j" '011, ~ ¡""", "Ii" or 0 'O"~dj" ,j",. """ moy b""liod ,.. '011 ~. or fence u¡ed for screening of parking areas. The sign shaJJ be subject to the following: [ ~/., a. The sign may only denote the name of the principal business or the name of the f commercial complex, . , b. Maximum sign area, twenry.five square feer. \. , C. Other regulations: AU signs are subject ro the regulations of Secrions 19,60.040 through 19.60.130 ' and the standards of Sections 19,60.140 through 19.60.210, D. Nonconfonning signs: See Sections 19.60.090 through 19.60.120, 02 - ,!)() 1223 - ~ PETROLEUM § 13531. DISPLAY REQUIREMENTS: EXEMPTION OF SPECIFIED GEOGRAPHIC AREAS: VIOLATIONS: ENFORCEMENT (a) Every person offering for sale or selling any motor vehicle fuel to the public from any place of business shall display on the premises an advertising medium which complies with the requirements of this article and which advertises the prices of the three major grades of motor vehicle fuel offered for sale. The advertising medium shall be clearly visible from the street or highway adjacent to the premises. When the place of business is situated at an intersection, the advertising medium shall be clearly visible from each street of the intersection. For the purposes of this subdivision, motor vehicle fuel does not include propane. (b) The governing body of any city, county, or city and county may, by ordinance, exempt specified geographic areas from the provisions of this section if, pursuant to Article 5 (commencing with Section 65300) of Chapter 3 of Title 7 of the Government Code, the areas are designated on the local general plan as scenic corridors or historic preservation areas. (c) (1) Except as provided in paragraph (2), any person who violates the provisions of subdivision (a) is guilty of an infraction and, upon conviction, is punishable by a fine not to exceed five hundred dollars ($500). (2) Any person who violates the provisions of subdivision (a) and who has been previously convicted two or more times of a violation of subdivision (a) is guilty of a misdemeanor and, upon conviction, is punishable by imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding six months, by a fine not exceeding one thousand dollars ($1,000), or by both. (d) Notwithstanding Section 13590, the district attorney of each county, or pursuant to Section 41803.5 of the Government Code, the city attorney of any general law city or chartered city within each county, or the county sealer, shall, upon complaint or upon his or her own motion, enforce the provisions of this section and, in addition, may bring an action for injunctive relief in accordance with Section 13611. Added Stats 1984 ch 698. § 13532. MOTOR FUEL: CONTENTS OF DISPLAY (a) It is unlawful fo~ any person to display any advertising medium whjch indicates the price of motor fuel unless the advertjsing medjum displays all of the following: . 145 o2-SI - - WEIGHTS AND MEASURES (1) The price per gallon or liter, including all taxes, in numerals, and fractions when applicable, not less than six inches in height and of uniform size and color. For the purpose of this article, fractions are considered one numeral. (2) The trademark or brand of the motor fuel in letters, figures, or numerals not less than one-third the size of the numerals designating the price. (3)The word "gasoline" or the name of other motor fuel in letters not less than one- third the size of the numerals designating the price, but these words need not be more than four inches in height. (4) The grade designation of the motor fuel in letters or numerals not less than one- sixth the size of the numerals designating the price, but this designation need not be more than four inches in height. (5) If motor fuel prices are advertised by the liter, the word "liter" shall be displayed on the advertising medium in letters not less than one-third the size of the numerals designating the price. (b) (1) It is unlawful for any person to display an advertising medium which advertises a discount or price reduction for motor fuel, unless the advertising medium contains all the following: (A) The price per gallon or liter from which the discount or price reduction is to be taken. (B) The amount of the discount or price reduction in cents per gallon or liter using numerals which do not exceed the height of the numerals in the advertised price. (C) The conditions of the discount or price reduction using words whose. letters are not less than one-third the size of the price numerals. (2) Any limitations under which the discount or price reduction is offered shall be explained in words whose letters are not less than one-third the size of the numerals indicating the prices. (3) There shall be available for each customer's reference, a chart showing the amount of discount for each type unit being sold (gallon/liter) or fraction thereof in one cent ($0.01) increments, or the retail dispensers used to dispense fuel at the discount price shall be set to compute the total sale at the discounted price per gallon or liter and shall be clearly labeled "Includes Cash Discount" in letters not less than one inch in height. ) .146 02-~o1... - - ~e/lMt# 2 for. Gðs PrI"e"'9rr and 'Propane" sigh dellúloc REQUIRED ELECTRICAL LOAD FOR ENTIRE PYLON SIGN: 1.20 Amp 5ervice. NOTE; Above grade footing at South end of faunda\an only \ ." """':;<'. NOTE; Actual footing to be determined by engineertng ~];".ff.9.f-"y\:QE!5, Clirb @ QLF INTEBNALLYlbLUMINAT~ ~~~TOIN^,ALlS"'PPEDIN S 1 '. -~- -- -~. _. - . All. 910NS SUPPLIED "y on<fRS SCALE: 1/2' . Sheet 1 of 9 On. (1) ReqUIred COPYRIGHT@1997 ~~$~::~ <",.~..~:".;,~~:~::;0~§~:~i978;,::è~~f;; :::~.: -~ g~~,:n,~".,:;:,':;~.'?,T,~.'~".~~';;:~",c,'?,!,~:,,?,~~ o1-S.3 ----~ -- - -----. PROPOSED CHULA VISTA MOBIL SERVICE STATION ..... - LOOKING WEST ON MAIN STREET (from the south side of Main Street) cJ - ~-r./ ~-. ~ - - - PROPOSED CHULA VISTA MOBIL SERVICE STATION "" III ,~.íJj. . '" SiÒ¡AGE EXAMPLES OF POLE SIGNS ON MAIN STREET (100 yards from proposed site) <::J - ~-r -, ..,. - - - - PROPOSED CHULA VISTA MOBIL SERVICE STATION EXAMPLE OF POLE SIGN ON MAIN STREET (at Main Street and 3rd Avenue) 02-~ -... . - - - - _. PROPOSED CHULA VISTA MOBIL SERVICE STATION EXAMPLES OF POLE SIGNS ON MAIN STREET (100 yards from proposed site) 02 -~7 -.. . ..,. - PROPOSED CHULA VISTA MOBIL SERVICE STATION EXAMPLES OF POLE SIGNS ON MAIN STREET (1/4 mile from proposed site) 02-st! --. - --- - PROPOSED CHULA VISTA MOBIL SERVICE STATION LOOKING EAST ON MAIN STREET (from the south side of Main Street) 02-.sq --- ..,. -. - - - PROPOSED CHULA VISTA MOBIL SERVICE STATION .c~""- LOOKING WEST ON MAIN STREET (from the north side of Main Street) This is the last signal to have a chance to to view the site and decide to enter r::./ - (,. 0 -.. ..,. -- - .' Mitigated Negative Declaration ATTACHMENT 5 PROJECT NAME: Chula Vista Food Mart & Car Wash PROJECT LOCATION: SEC of Main & Mace Streets, City of Chula Vista ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO.: 629-130-30 PROJECT APPLICANT: Ali Amani, Worldwide Petroleum Co. CASE NO.: IS-00-14 DATE: April 7, 2000 A. Project Setting The project site consists of a vacant near-level graded 1.57 acre site located on the south east corner of Main Street and Mace Street in the City's Southwest Redevelopment Area. Surrounding uses are as follows: North: (across Main Street) Light Industrial - V-Haul Storage; East: Light Industrial- Self Storage facility; South: Light Industrial- single family residence/auto storage; West: (across Main Street) Light Industrial- muffler & raditator repair shop. The project site has been cleared of all vegetation and therefore does not represent viable habitat for any sensitive animal species. Main Street is designated as a four-lane major arterial, by the City's Circulation Element. Mace Street is a local street. B. Project Description The proposed project consists of a proposed fueling station with .16 fueling stations (pumps) for passenger vehicles, two fueling stations for commercial trucks, convenience food mart, dcrive-thru restaurant and an express car wash. The total building area is 6,529 square feet. The service station and food mart are proposed to operate 24 hours and the car wash will be open between the hours of7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. The applicant is proposing to install two driveways on Main Street and two driveways on Mace Street to serve the proposed development. The project will provide a total of 22 parking spaces on-site in accordance with the City's Zoning Ordinance parking standards for the proposed uses. New landscaped areas, will be provided essentially along the perimeter ofthe project site with special emphasis along the Main Street frontage. The landscaped area will include grass turf and shrubs. The total on-site and off-site landscaping area proposed is 9,042 square feet. ~\~ A:Illbllindalis9807.neg .1-(.1 Page 1 -..- .~ city of chula vista planning department 0lY Of environmental review section CHUIA VISfJ - - The project will require granting of a discretionary pennit of approval from the City of Chula Vista Design Review Committee and the Redevelopment Agency and will require that the applicant obtain permits from the Air Pollution Control District and the San Diego County Department of Environmental Health. C. Compatibility with Zoning and Plans The current zoning on-site is ILP (Limited Industrial Precise Plan) and the site is designated as Limited Industrial use by the City's General Plan. The proposed project is in compliance with the Zoning designation and the adapted General Plan. D. Identification of Environmental Effects An Initial Study conducted by the City ofChula Vista (including an attached Environmental Checklist fonn) determined that the proposed project will not have a significant environmental effect, and the preparation of an Environmental Impact Repart will not be required. This Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with Section 15070 of the State CEQA Guidelines. \. Public Services Impact Fire The nearest fire station is located about 5 miles from the project site. The estimated response time is less than seven (7) minutes. The response time complies with the City Threshald Standards for fire and medical response time. The Fire Department will review the building construction plans to ensure that the proposed construction complies with applicable California Building Code regulations, including installation of underground fuel tanks. Police The Police Department indicates that current levels of service and response time will be provided to the proposed land uses. 2. Utility and Service Systems Soils The applicant will be required to prepare an updated soils report as part of the standard conditions of the proposed grading plan. The applicant shall comply with the applicable recommendations as detennined by the City engineer. A:\llb\linda\is9807.neg Page 2 .2-'~ - - Drainage On-site The Engineering Division indicates that existing on-site drainage patterns will need to connect to public storm drain facilities. The applicant will be required as a standard candition by the Engineering Division to submit hydraulic study and car wash water recycling plan with the first submittal of grading/improvement plans. The on-site drainage plan will address the prevention of contamination of soils and groundwater trom underground fuel tanks and the car wash and food martldrive-thru restaurant operations. As a standard permitting procedure, the applicant will be required to obtain a permit trom the County of San Diego Environmental Health Department, who will oversee the installation of the underground fuel tanks in conjunction with the City's Fire Department and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. Off-site The Engineering Division states that there is an existing curb inlet and a manhole on the south side of Main Street and three curb inlets on the north side of Main Street. Through the preparation and submittal of the aforementioned hydraulic plan the Engineering Division will be able to determine the type of storm drain pipes, their size and the existing routing pattern. This report will be required with the first submittal of grading/improvement plans. The developer is required to implement Best Management Practices to prevent pollution of storm drainage facilities per City ofChula Vista Municipal code 14.20. A National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Permit is not required because the subject site is less than five acres. Sewer Sewage flows and volumes are currently being adequately maintained. A 10 inch sewer main flaws in a westerly direction in Main Street. The Engineering Division states that the Salt Creek sewer main will provide additional capacity and thus ensure future development in the area has no adverse impact to existing sewer facilities. The proposed project will comply with City adopted Sewer Threshold Standards. A wastewater industrial permit may also be required trom the City of San Diego Metropolitan Wastewater Department. As a standard engineering condition the car wash will be required to be equipped with an automatic water recycling system. A:lllbllindalis9807.neg Page 3 .2- ,.3 - . - Streetsffraffic The Threshold Standards Policy requires that all signalized arterial segments operate at a Level of Service (LOS) "c" or better, with the exception that Level of Service (LOS) "D" may occur during the peak two hours of the day at signalized intersections. No intersection may reach an LOS "F" during the average weekday peak hour. Intersections of arterials with freeway ramps are exempt from this policy. The proposed project would comply with this Threshald Policy for the immediately affected intersection of Main Street and Mace Street. Pursuant to a traffic study prepared by Will dan, (3/20/00) the proposed project will generate a total Average Daily Traffic of 2,580 driveway daily trips. A great majority of these trips (79 %) are considered to be pass-by trips (trips where the primary destiny is not the proposed project). Three intersections analyzed by the report included Main Street and Hilltop Drive, Main Street and Albany Avenue, and Main Street and Mace Street. The three intersections are currently operating at a Level of Service "c" or better. The first two intersections are signalized and would continue to operate at an LOS "c" with the proposed project. The "T" intersection of Main & Mace Street is presently unsignalized and would continue to operate at an LOS "B" during AM Peak hour traffic and LOS "D" during PM Peak hour traffic. The Engineering Divisian has reviewed the report findings and concurs that both Main Street and Mace Street have adequate street volume capacity to serve the project. The Engineering Division indicates that the project has been found to be consistent with the General Plan Traffic Element. The applicant will be required to make minor street dedication and improvements along Main Street and improvements along Mace Street frontages per the City Engineering Division. No traffic impact mitigation will be required. 3. Noise Proiect operation An acoustical report prepared for the proposed project identified three main sources of noise associated with the proposed project. The project would generate 1.) construction noise 2.) equipment noise (PA menu ordering) and 3.) mobile noise generally from vehicles utilizing drive-thru. The nearby sensitive noise receptor is an existing home located west of the site in an industrially designated site. The report findings indicate that the vehicle noise and the outside P A system would not generate noise levels that would adversely impact the adjacent residence located over fifty feet from the proposed location ofthe drive"thru restaurant. Additionally, the applicant proposes to construct a nine-foot wall that would effectively further reduce the projected acceptable noise levels by 15 dBA. No mitigation will be required. A,\lIb\linda\is9807.neg Page 4 .2-,ý - - Construction Temporary construction noise would occur at the site, however, the short term nature 0 f the noise, the proximity of a maj or arterial and the commercial/industrial nature of the surrounding area results in less than significant impacts. No mitigation will be required. 4. Aesthetics The propased project will be subject to review and approval by the Design Review Committee (ORe). The proposed site plan, architectural design, landscaping and lighting plans will be subject to' review by the DRC to ensure the proposed project will complement surrounding development and comply with all applicable design and landscaping standards. 5. Air Qualitv The project has the potential approval will generate an incremental increase in short and long-term emissions associated with a small increase in traffic. Redevelopment of the subject site is consistent with the zoning and general plan designations and is therefore consistent with the goals and objectives of the Regional Air Quality Strategy (RAQS). The traffic will be generated for the most part from the local existing surrounding area and is not expected to induce growth in other areas af the community. The majority of the traffic associated with the project is considered to be pass-by traffic (traffic already on the roadway and stopping for services on the way to another primary destiny, per the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) publication entitled "Trip Generation Manual").The proposed redevelopment project will therefore not result in a significant air quality impact. The applicant will also be required to obtain a permit from the Air Pollution Control District (APCD) regarding the installation of vapor recovery systems associated with the fuel pumps and underground fuel storage tanks. No mitigation will be required. 6. Hazardous Waste A phase I envirorunental site assessment was conducted by GEOCON Envirorunental Consultants for the subject site. The report is dated March 10,2000. A review of aerial photographs indicate previous site use as an auto wrecking yard. The environmental consultant indicates that sites used as former wrecking yards are commonly impacted with potentially hazardous wastes such as metals, petroleum hydrocarbons and solvents. The consultant recommends limited soil sampling and laboratory analyses to investigate the potential presence of impacts to soil resulting A:lllbllindalis9807.neg Page 5 .2- '" S- - - ENG_INC- P - co 1 APR-11-øø TUE 13:4121 GARY Wor-ld.'¡de Pe~r-oleum Co (8581456-6355 p. 1 Apr- 10 00 08:10" 01110/00 ~ON 07:41 FAX 61a 476 5310 C!I¡'U VISTA CO,\I). DEVEL, Ii1I OO¡ - fram previous on-site activities. A miHgauon measure will be required in order tt, addr~ss potentia! impacts to soils, groundwater and tbe propo$cd food related uses, E M!.Mation N~c~ö"lry to,.hvoid Si~l1ific~.ff~. Spl%iCic project Illitigalion m~aS\l.re$ arc required to reduce potential environmonlal imp;¡Gt¡: idcn1ified in the Initial Study for this pn)j~ct to a level below significant. The miti¡¡atior measures will be made a condition of,approvaJ. as weB as reqlJ.Írem~nts of the attache, , Mitica¡jon Mnn;lor;,ns P'°s"= (Attnohmcm "A'} 1 agree t<1 implement the required mitÌgil!Ìon measure(s) as stated below: ~. ~"U;: -,:!-I/-"~ ' 't TJ. le Date I. Prjar the issuance of any grading Or consu"Uetion permit, tile applical1t shall be required to conlrect with a registered geologist or certified ci"i) engineer ì.c the Slati of Califorrû~ to conduct soìllestì.cg for haz3J'dous waste materi3Js and to enl~r inte the voluntary Site Assessment &. Mitigation Program 3S administered by Ùle Sar. Oioga County Department of Environmental Heahh who will OVersee the results of the soDs test and recommend appropriate remctliarlon ~ required. F. ç.Q~ 1. lMividuals and OJ~anlZ-lli.Qill! City ofChula Vist;¡: Benjamin GuelTero, Community Development Samj¡ NuhaiJy, F.ngineerin8 Muna Cuthbert, Engineering Majed AI.Ohafry, Engineering Ralph Leyva, Engineering Brad Kemp. Building Division Dollg Pony. Fire Dep3.llmcnt Rich3l'd Preuss. Crime Prevention ;¡:¡¡;bii;"~ '-'---~ ~-,c. - - Chula Vista City School District: Dr. Lowell Billings Sweetwater Union High School District: Katy Wright Applicant's Agent: Robert G. Faudoa, Project Manager/Gary Eng. 2. Documents Chula Vista General Plan (1989) and ErR (1989) Title 19, Chula Vista Municipal c.ode Noise Analysis (3/13/00),lnvestigative Science & Eng., Acoustical Consultants Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (3/00) Geocon Environmental Consultants Traffic Study (Revised 3120/00, Main & Mace) Willdan Soils Report (7/10/81) William S. Krooskos & Associates 3. Initial Studv This environmental detennination is based on the attached Initial Study, any comments received on the Initial Study and any comments received during the public review period for this Mitigated Negative Declaration. The report reflects the independent judgement of the City ofChula Vista. Further infonnation regarding the environmental review of this project is available from the Chula Vista Planning Department, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910. ~~ 1.),00 Date: Bnan Hunt r Planning & Environmental Manager A:\lIb\linda\is9807.neg Page 7 02 -, 1 . ." Case No. IS-00-14 ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM 1. Name of Proponent: Ali Amani, Worldwide Petroleum Co. 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 3. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: 1768 EI Paso Real La Jolla, CA. 92037 (619) 920-2827 4. Name of Proposal: Chula Vista Food Mart & Car Wash 5. Date of Checklist: April 6, 2000 P,"o,',II, P",o",II, 5igolll"o' L.."h,o Sigoill"o' "0"" Sigolll"o' No Imp'" M"'g"" Imp", Imp'" I. LAND USE AND PLANNING: Would the proposal: a) Conflict with general plan designation or 0 0 0 181 zoning? b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or 0 0 0 181 policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction over the project? c) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g., 0 0 0 181 impacts to soils or [¡,rmlands, or impacts from incompatible land uses)? d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of 0 0 0 181 an established community (including a low- incame or minority community)? Comments: The vacant site is zoned Limited Industrial Precise Plan (ILP) and designated for Research and Limited Industrial use by the City's General Plan. The proposed project would require review by the Design Review Committee. No adverse impacts or conflicts with the zoning or General Plan are noted. A:lllbllindalis9808ck.frm Page 1 o1-,g - - P",o".lly P,"o".lly S;go;fi"" L", "" S;go'fi"OI Uol~, Sigoifi,," N, Imp." M"ig.." Imp." Imp." II. POPULATION AND HOUSING: Would the proposal: a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local 0 0 0 [;I population projections? b) Induce substantial growth in an area either 0 0 0 [;I directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in an undeveloped area or extension of major infrastructure)? c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable 0 0 0 [;I housing? Comments: The proposed project would not contribute to local population growth nor displacement of existing housing. No adverse impacts are noted. III. GEOPHYSICAL: Would the proposal result in or expose people to potential impacts involving: a) Unstable earth conditions or changes in 0 0 0 [;I geologic substructures? b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or 0 0 0 [;I overcovering of the soil? c) Change in topography or ground surface relief 0 0 0 [;I features? d) The destruction, covering or modification of 0 0 0 [;I any unique geologic or physical features? e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, 0 0 0 [;I either on or off the site? f) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach 0 0 0 [;I sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or erosion which may modifY the channel of a river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any bay inlet or lake? g) Exposure of people or property to geologic 0 0 0 [;I hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud slides, ground failure, or similar hazards? Comments: No adverse impacts regarding soils or geophysical conditions are noted. A soils report prepared by William Krooskos & Associates on July] 0, 198] for the subject site has been submitted by the applicant's agent. The report indicates that the site contains medium expansive, sandy, clay soils capable of supporting an industrial structure(s). A Aolllbllindalis9808ck.frm Page 2 .;1-"1 - - Pot,"'i,II, P"""'i,II, Sig"ill,,", L6<1h," Sig"'fi,,", v""" Sig"ifi,,", N" Imp", MiHg"'" Imp'" Imp'" more up to date soils report addressing the proposed project structures shall be submitted by the applicant as a standard condition of grading penn it approval. No mitigation will be required. IV. WATER: Would the proposal result in: a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, 0 0 181 0 or the rate and amount of surface runoff? b) Exposure of people or property to water related 0 0 0 181 hazards such as flooding or tidal waves? c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration 0 0 0 181 of surface water quality (e.g., temperature, dissolved oxygen or turbidity)? d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any 0 0 0 181 water body? e) Changes in currents, or the course of direction 0 0 0 181 of water movements, in either marine or fresh waters? t) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either 0 0 0 181 through direct additions or withdrawals, or through interception of an aquifer by cuts or excavations? g) Altered direction or rate of flow of 0 0 D 181 groundwater? h) Impacts to groundwater quality? 0 0 181 D i) Alterations to the course or flow of flood 0 0 0 181 waters? j) Substantial reduction in the amount of water 0 0 0 181 otherwise available for public water supplies? Comments: The subject site is located in a fully urban setting and represents infill development. The project site is not within a flood plain. On-site drainage facilities design will need to take into consideration pollution prevention devices and filtration systems in order to prevent contamination of soils and groundwater from underground fuel tanks, car wash and food mart. The Engineering Division states that on-site drainage facilities and devices be incorporated in the design with the first submittal ofthe grading and improvement plans as part of the standard requirements for new construction. The applicant will be required by the Engineering Division to submit a hydraulic study and car wash water recycling plan with the first submittal of grading/improvement plans. A stonn water industrial pennit may be required from the State Water Resources Control Board. As standard permitting procedure, the applicant will be required to obtain a pennit from the County of San Diego Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Division for underground fuel A:Illbllindalis9808ck.frm Page 3 01- 1fJ - - P",,'i,", P..,,'i,", Si"in"" ""..h" St"in,,", """, St"ifi,,", N, Imp'" Miti""" Imp'" Imp'" tank installation. This established process includes review and approval by the City of Chula Vista's Fire Department and Building Division. No adverse impacts to water resources are noted. No mitigation will be required. V. AIR QUALITY: Would the proposal: a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to 0 0 181 0 an existing or projected air quality violation? b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants? 0 0 0 181 c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature, 0 0 0 181 or cause any change in climate, either locally or regionally? d) Create objectionable odors? 0 0 0 181 e) Create a substantial increase in stationary or 0 0 181 0 non-stationary sources of air emissions or the deterioration of ambient air quality? Comments: The project will subject to standard requirements regarding the installation of fuel vapor recovery systems aimed at reducing contaminants released to the air. The applicant will be required to comply with these arid other standard requirements as part of the existing permitting process which involves the San Diego County Department of Environmental Health Hazardous Materials Division, the Air Pollution control District, and the City's Fire Department. No mitigation will be required. VI. TRANSPORTATION/CIRCULATION: Would the proposal result in: a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? 0 0 181 0 b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., 0 0 0 181 sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? c) Inadequate emergency access or access to 0 0 0 181 nearby uses? d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? 0 0 0 181 e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or 0 0 0 181 bicyclists? t) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting 0 0 D 181 alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts, bicycle racks)? 0 0 0 181 Ao\llb\linda\is9808ck.fnn Page 4 r:J-71 - - Po"o"olly P","';olly S;go;fi"" C""hoo S;goifi,," "0"" S;go;fi"" No I"po" M;';g".d Imp'" Imp", g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? h) A "large project" under the Congestion 0 0 I< 0 Management Program? (An equivalent of2400 or more average daily vehicle trips or 200 or more peak-hour vehicle trips.) Comments: Main Street, classified as a four-lane major arterial by the City's Circulation Element, will provide the primary access to the project site. A traffic analysis was prepared for the proposed project on March 20, 2000 by Willdan consultants. The traffic report stated that a total of2,580 driveway daily trips, will be potentially generated by this project. A great majority of these trips are considered to be pass-by trips (trips not actually generated by this project). Three critical intersections in the vicinity of the project were analyzed by the traffic study. These intersections were Main Street and Hilltop Drive, Main Street and Albany Avenue, and Main Street and Mace Street. The three intersections are currently operating at a Level of Service "C" or better. The first two intersections are signalized and would continue to operate at an LOS "C" with the proposed project. The "T" intersection of Main & Mace Street is presently unsignalized and would continue to operate at an LOS "B" during AM Peak hour traffic and LOS "D" during PM Peak hour traffic. Based on City of Chula Vista traffic threshold standards for intersections, this is an acceptable LOS for existing and proposed project conditions. The traffic report does not recommend any off-site traffic improvements. The Engineering Division will, as standard condition of design review, require on-site and project frontage improvements on Main Street and Mace Street. No mitigation will be required. VII. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Would the proposal result in impacts to: a) Endangered, sensitive species, species of 0 0 I< 0 concern or species that are candidates for listing? b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage 0 0 0 I< trees)? c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g, 0 0 0 181 oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)? d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian and 0 0 0 181 vernal pool)? e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? 0 0 0 181 f) Affect regional habitat preservation planning 0 0 0 181 efforts? Comments: The project site is located in an urbanized area and is cleared of all vegetation. There are presently no native plants or sensitive animal species. The site is located in the midst of a highly urbanized and trafficked area and does not represent viable habitat for any A:\llbllindalis9808ck.fll11 Page 5 07- 7~ - - p",",;,IIy "',oh,IIy S;go;fi"o' L"..h,o S;go;fi"o' Vo'", Sigoifi"o' No Imp", Mitig..'" Imp", Imp", animal species. VIII. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES: Would the proposal: a) Contlict with adopted energy conservation 0 0 0 ø plans? b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and 0 0 0 I8J inefficient manner? c) If the site is designated for mineral resource 0 0 0 ø protection, will this project impact this. protection? Comments: No impacts to non-renewable resources are noted. IX. HAZARDS: Would the proposal involve: a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of 0 0 0 ø hazardous substances (including, but not limited to: petroleum products, pesticides, chemicals or radiation)? b) Possible interference with an emergency 0 0 0 I8J response plan or emergency evacuation plan? c) The creation of any health hazard or potential 0 0 0 I8J health hazard? d) Exposure of people to existing sources of 0 ø 0 0 potential health hazards? e) Increased fire hazard in areas with tlammable 0 0 0 ø brush, grass, or trees? Comments: A phase I environmental site assessment was conducted by GEOCON Environmental Consultants for the subject site. A review of aerial photographs indicate previous site use as an auto wrecking yard. The report indicates that sites fonnerly used as wrecking yards could potentially be impacted with hazardous wastes such as metals, petroleum hydrocarbons and solvents. The report recommends limited soil sampling and laboratory analyses to investigate the potential presence of impacts to soil resulting from previous on-site activities. A mitigation measure will be required in order to address potential impacts to soils, groundwater and the proposed food related uses. The proposed project shall also comply with all applicable standard required pennitting processes administered by local, state and federal agencies. Compliance with established standard procedures will ensure that people will not be exposed to accidental health hazards related to the proposed fueling station. The project proponent will, as standard procedure be subject to review and approval by the County of San Diego Environmental Health regarding the A:\llb\lindalis9808ck.frm Page 6 02.-7~ - - P","<i.lly Po""<i.Il, Sig"m,,", L.."h.. Sig"ifi,,", V"I", Sig"m,,"! No Impoc! Mit'g"" Impoc! Imp'" proposed installation of underground fuel tanks. X. NOISE: Would the proposal result in: a) Increases in existing noise levels? 0 0 ¡¡ 0 b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels? 0 0 0 ¡¡ Comments: Surrounding land uses include mixed commercial, residential and light industrial. An existing legal non-conforming single family detached residence is directly adjacent to the southwest comer of the project site. Surrounding properties are designated for industrial zoning and land use by the City's Zoning and General Plan. The topography of the site and surrounding adjacent areas is le"\el. A Noise study prepared by Investigative Science and Engineering on March 20, 2000 indicates that the project site and surrounding property is impacted by surface street traffic and auto repair shop activities immediately west of the site. The hourly average sound level (or Leq-h) recorded over the monitoring period was 58.1 dBA. The applicable significance criteria as established by the City of Chula Vista Noise Ordinance would permit a 62.5 dBA Leq between the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. and 57.5 dBA Leq between 10:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. The proposed drive-thru restaurant would be located about 50 feet away from the existing single family residence. The traffic increment solely associated with the drive-thru facility (estimated at 150 daily trips) would generate a negligible (less than 0.5 dBA) increase in the ambient noise level at the project site. Due to the small size of the drive-thru facility (2,388 square-feet) it is anticipated that the refrigeration units, based on building industry standards would produce a noise factor of between 58 and 60 dBA at 15 feet from the source. With proper unit installation and standard shielding, the worst-case nighttime property line standard of 57.5 dBA would be achievable. Therefore, no significant impacts are expected due to ancillary equipment operation at the proposed drive-thru facility. The noise study also looked at the potential for the outdoor speaker to create noise impact. The outdoor speaker has the potential to create noise levels approaching 60 dBA at 30 feet from the source. The residential structure is 30 feet away from the proposed location of the outdoor speaker. Additionally, allowing for an average distribution of 150 ADT/24 Hours or 6.25 trips per hour (each with a speaker duration of 1 minute) gives an hourly property line level of 41.2 dBA (in the presence of other surrounding noises) which is currently below the ambient daytime measured level. It is also noted that the project design incorporates the use of a 9-foot-high (at grade level) screen wall along the property line located between the project site and the closest residential receptor. The use ofthis screen wall would provide an additional maximum of 15-dBA reduction to ground level receptors at this closest residential structure. Therefore the report concludes that no direct impacts resulting from the operation of the proposed drive-thru facility are expected. Temporary construction noise would occur at the site, however, the short term nature of the noise, the proximity of major arterials and the commerciallindustrial nature of the surrounding area results in less than significant impacts. No adverse impacts are noted. No mitigation will be required. XI. PUBLIC SERVICES: Would the proposal have A,\llbllind,\is9808ck.frm P'ge 7 02--"" - - P....".II, P.....,.II, Slg.,fi,,"' L~,'h," S'g.ifiu.. "."" Sig.lfi".' N. Imp", M"ig..,d Imp." Imp." an effect upon, or result in a needfor new or altered government services in any of the following areas: a) Fire protection? 0 0 0 181 b) Police protection? 0 0 0 181 c) Schools? 0 0 0 181 d) Maintenance of public facilities, including 0 0 0 181 roads? e) Other governmental services? 0 0 0 181 Comments: No new Governmental services will be required to serve the project. No adverse impacts are noted. Fire and police protection can adequately be provided. Appropriate school fees will be paid. Street dedication and improvements along Main Street and improvements along Mace Street will be made in accordance with City Standards. No mitigation will be required. 0 0 0 181 XII. THRESHOLDS: Will the proposal adversely impact the City's Threshold Standards? As described below, the proposed project does no,! adversely impact any of the seen Threshold Standards. a) Fire/EMS 0 0 0 181 The Threshold Standards requires that fire and medical units must be able to respond to calls within 7 minutes or less in 85% of the cases and within 5 minutes or less in 75% of the cases. The City of Chula Vista has indicated that this threshold standard will be met, since the nearest fire station is 2 miles away and would be associated with a 5-minute response time. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard. Comments: The Fire Department indicates that nearest fire statio':! is located within 2 miles and adequate fire service and protection can be provided to the proposed project site. b) Police 0 0 0 181 The Threshold Standards require that police units must respond to 84% of Priority 1 calls within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority I calls of 4.5 minutes or less. Police units must respond to 62.10% of Priority 2 calls within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority 2 calls of7 minutes or less. The proposed project is located in an area where police ART data for priority I and Priority 2 calls is currently unavailable. Comments: The Police Department indicates that current levels of police service can continue to be provided to the area where the subject site is located. Crime Prevention personnel are available to assist the applicant with security recommendations. No significant adverse impacts to Police service are noted. No mitigation will be required. A,llIbllindalis9808ck.frm Page 8 ':;-7~ - - Po'""'I,", P",""d,"y Sig"lfi,,", L",'h.. Slg"ifi,,", V""" Slg"m,,", No Imp", Midg..,' Imp'" Imp", C) Traffic 0 0 ~ 0 The Threshold Standards require that all signalized arterial segments operate at a Level of Service (LOS) "C" or better, with the exception that Level of Service (LOS) "D" may occur during the peak two hours of the day at signalized intersections. Intersections west ofI-80S are not to operate at a LOS below their 1987 LOS. No intersection may reach LOS "E" or "F" during the average weekday peak hour. Intersections of arterials with freeway ramps are exempted from this Standard. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard. Comments: The Engineering Division concurs with the traffic study prepared by Willdan (3/20/00) that the current Level-of- Service (baS) "C" enjoyed by Main Street and Mace Street, would remain the same with approval of the proposed project. The Engineering Division reviewed traffic data for Main Street and Mace Street and concluded that these would be adequate to serve the proposed project subject to standard dedication of r.o.w. and improvement along the frontage of Main Street and improvement along the frontage of Mace Street to City Engineering standards. No mitigation will be required. d) Parks/Recreation 0 0 0 ~ The Threshold Standard for Parks and Recreation is 3 acres/1,OOO population. This standard does not apply to the proposed project. Comments: No adverse impacts to parks or recreational opportunities are noted. e) Drainage 0 0 0 ~ The Threshold Standards require that storm water flows and volumes not exceed City Engineering Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary improvements consistent with the Drainage Master Plan(s) and City Engineering Standards. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard. Comments: Off-siie drainage facilities exist in the area and pipe capacity willl:ie looked at through the standard submittal of a hydraulic plan with the first submittal of grading/improvement plans per the Engineering Division. t) Sewer 0 0 ~ 0 The Threshold Standards require that sewage flows and volumes not exceed City Engineering Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary improvements consistent with Sewer Master Plan(s) and City Engineering Standards. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard. Comments: Sewer capacities will not be adversely affected through project implementation. The existing adjacent sewer lines will be evaluated by the Engineering Divisian as necessary at the design stage of the project. The Salt Creek Trunk Sewer will eliminate any potential klllbllindalis9808cUnn Page 9 OJ- 7(. - - Po...",II, P",..I,II, S'g';o~.. u.nh.. S'g.ifi~.. U.,.., Slg';o~.. No Imp", MI<'g",d Imp", Imp'" capacity problems. No mitigation is required. g) Water 0 0 0 ø The Threshold Standards require that adequate storage, treatment, and transmission facilities are constructed concurrently with planned growth and that water quality standards are not jeopardized during growth and construction. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard. Applicants may also be required to participate in whatever water conservation or fee off- set program the City ofChula Vista has in effect at the time of building permit issuance. Comments: Water quality standards with respect to adequate storage, treatment and transmission facilities would not be affected as a result of project approval. XIII UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS: Would the proposal result in a needfor new systems, or substantial alterations to the following utilities: a) Power or natural gas? 0 0 0 ø b) Communications systems? 0 0 0 ø c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution 0 0 0 ø facilities? d) Sewer or septic tanks? 0 0 0 ø e) Storm water drainage? 0 0 0 ø f) Solid waste disposal? 0 0 0 ø Comments: The proposed uses will not generate a need for new systems or cause alteration to the aforementioned utilities. The existing sewer lines along Main Street currently have the capacity to handle the proposed sewer per the Engineering Division. The Salt .Creek Trunk sewer will provide additional capacity in the future. Chula Vista Municipal Code Section 14.20.120 requires the incorporation of stonn water pollution prevention measures into the proposed auto repair facility. A stonnwater industrial penn it may be required from the State Water Resources Control Board. A wastewater industrial pennit may also be required from the City of San Diego Metropolitan Wastewater Department. No mitigation will be required, since these would become standard conditions of project of approval once a detennination is made that these will be required. XIV AESTHETICS: Would the proposal: a) Obstruct any scenic vista or view open to the 0 0 0 ø public or will the proposal result in the creation of an aesthetically offensive site open to public A:lllbllindalis9808ck.fnn Page 10 ~- 71 - - Po"oli.lly Po,,",i.lly S¡,o'fi,,", L,,"hoo S¡,oifi,,", Vo'", Si,o'fi,,", No Imp." Mi<i,..", Imp." Imp." view? b) Cause the destruction or modification of a D D D 181 scenic route? c) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect? D D D 181 d) Create added light or glare sources that could D D D 181 increase the level of sky glow in an area or cause this project to fail to comply with Section 19.66.100 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, Title 19? e) Reduce an additional amount of spill light? D D D 181 Comments: Approval of the project design, iighting and landscaping is subject to a discretionary Design Review process. No mitigation will be required. XV .CULTURAL RESOURCES: Would the proposal: a) Will the proposal result in the alteration of or D D D 181 the destruction or a prehistoric or historic archaeological site? b) Will the proposal result in adverse physical or D D D 181 aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic building, structure or object? c) Does the proposal have the potential to cause a D D D 181 physical change which would affect unique ethnic cultural values? d) Will the proposal restrict existing religious or D D D 181 sacred uses within the potential impact area? e) Is the area identified on the City's General Plan D D D 181 EIR as an area of high potential for archeological resources? Comments: There are no identified cultural resources within the project area. XVI PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES: Will the D D D 181 proposal result in the alteration of or the destruction of paleontological resources? Comments: There are no identified paleontological resources within the project area. XVII RECREATION: Would the proposal: A:\lIb\linda\is9808ck.fITll Page II 0';- 7'1 - - P""o<i.Uy P"..".U, Slgol",,", L,,"h.. Slgom,,", "0"" Slgol",.., N, Imp." Mlllg.'" Imp." Imp." a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or 0 0 0 1>0 regional parks or other recreational facilities? b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? 0 0 0 1>0 c) Interfere with recreation parks & recreation 0 0 0 1>0 plans or programs? Comments: There are no recreational facilities that will be adversely affected by the proposed auto repair operations. XVIII MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE: See Negative Declarationfor mandatory findings of significance. If an E1R is needed, this section should be completed: a) Does the project have the potential to degrade 0 0 0 1>0 the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods or California history or prehistory? Comments: The site is presently vacant and cleared and graded of all plant materials. The site lies within a fully urbanized area and does not represent viable habitat for any sensitive animal species. b) Does the project have the potential to achieve 0 0 0 0 short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term, environmental goals? Comments: The scope and nature of the project would not result in the curtailment of any long-term environmental goals. c) Does the project have impacts that are 0 0 0 1>0 individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) A:\llbl1mdalis9808ck.fnn Page 12 02-'71 - - "',"",IIy """',IIy S,,"'fiu", L....h.. St,"'fi,,", v",.., Si,"'fi,,"' No Imp", """",,, Imp'" Imp'" Comments: There are no incremental impacts associated with the project. d) Does the project have environmental effect 0 Ii 0 0 which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Comments: No adverse effects to human beings is anticipated from construction and operation of the proposed project. The applicant will be required to comply with mitigation involving limited soil sampling in order to detect the presence of hazardous wastes on the subject site due to previous use of the site as an auto wrecking yard (see section XIX below). Compliance with the mitigation measure will ensure potential impacts are reduced to less than significant. XIX. PROJECT REVISIONS OR MITIGATION MEASURES: 1. Prior to the issuance of any grading or construction penn it, the applicant shall be required to contract with a registered geologist or certified civil engineer in the State of California to conduct soil testing for hazardous waste materials and to enter in the voluntary Site Assessment & Mitigation Program as administered by the San Diego County Department of Environmental Health who will oversee the results of the soils test and recommend appropriate remediation as required. XX. ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED: The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated," as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. 0 Land Use and Planning 0 Transportation/Circulation 0 Public Services 0 Population and Housing 0 Biological Resources 0 Utilities and Service Systems 0 Geophysical 0 Energy and Mineral Resources 0 Aesthetics 0 Water 181 Hazards (Hazardous Waste) 0 Cultural Resources 0 Air Quality 0 Noise 0 Recreation 0 Mandatory Findings of Significance A,\llb\linda\is9808ck.fnn Page 13 02-tlO - ., XXI. DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the 0 environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the [8 environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an attached sheet have been added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.. . I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an 0 ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but 0 at least one effect: I) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets, if the effect is a "potentially significant impacts" or "potentially significant unless mitigated." An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the 0 environment, there WILL NOT be a significant effect in this case because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR pursuant to applicable standards and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project. An addendum has been prepared to provide a record of this determination. ~~~ April 6. 2000 Date Planning & Environmental Manager City ofChula Vista A:Illbllindalis9808ck.fnn Page 14 ól. -1' - - ATTACHMENT "A" Mitigation Monitoring Program 15-00-14 This Mitigation Monitoring Program is prepared for the Chula Vista Food Mart & car wash to be located at the southeast comer of Main Street and Mace Street in the City of Chula Vista. The legislation requires public agencies to ensure that adequate mitigation measures are implemented and monitored on Mitigated Negative Declarations, such as IS-00-14. AB 3180 requires monitoring of potentially significant and/or significant environmental impacts. The mitigation monitoring program for this project ensures adequate implementation of mitigation for the following potential impact(s): Hazardous Waste. Due to the nature of the environmental issues identified, the Mitigation Compliance Coordinator (MCC). shall be the Planning & Environmental Manager for the Community Development Department in the City of ChuJa Vista. It shall be the responsibility of the applicant to ensure that the conditions of the Mitigation Monitoring Program are met to the satisfaction of the Planning & Environmental Manager. Evidence in written fonn confinning compliance with the mitigation measure specified in Mitigated Negative Declaration No. IS-00-14 shall be provided by the applicant identified in the attached Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Checklist, to the Planning & Environmental Manager within one week of compliance with said mitigation measure. The Planning & Environmental Manager will thus provide the ultimate verification that the mitigation measure has been accomplished. .J-fJ.- - ." MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING CHECKLIST PROJECT NAME: Chula Vista Food Mart & Car Wash INITIAL STUDY NO: 00-14 Issue Area Hazardous Waste Mitigation Measure #1 "Prior to the issuance of any grading or construction permit, the applicant shall be required to contract with a registered geolagist or certified civil engineer in the State of California to conduct soil testing for hazardous waste materials and to enter in the voluntary Site Assessment & Mitigation Program as administered by the San Diego County Department of Environmental Health who will oversee the results of the soils test and recommend appropriate remediation as required. " Full compliance with this mitigation will help identifY and if required reduce potential impacts to the subject site by a previous auta wrecking that may have contaminated on-site soils. Proiect Phase Implementation (Proiect Design; Construction; Post Construction) Prior to the issuance of any grading or construction permits means that this will be a condition of approval reflected in DRC conditions. All grading and working drawings will be subject to review by the Planning & Building, Engineering and Community Development Departments to ensure implementation of this mitigation measure. Responsible Agency lies)' City Planning & Building Department City Engineering Division Community Development Department 2 02 -1.3 - - ATTACHMENT 6 ReCording Requested By: CHULA VISTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 When Recorded Mail To: CHULA VISTA REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Attn: Judi Bell (Space Above This Line For Recorder) APN: 629-130.30 OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT Worldwide Petroleum Company 3733 Main Street THIS AGREEMENT ('Agreement") is entered into by the REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA a public body corporate and politic (hereinafter referred to as . AGENCY"), and Worldwide Petroleum Company, a California Corporation (hereinafter referred to as "DEVELOPER") effective as of July 11, 2000. WHEREAS, the DEVELOPER desires to develop real property within the SOUTHWEST REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA ('Project Area") which is subject to the jurisdiction and control of the AGENCY; and, WHEREAS, the DEVELOPER has presented plans for development to the Design Review Committee and the Planniný Commission for the construction of an Service Station with 16 fueling pumps for passenger vehicles, 2 fueling pumps for commercial trucks and an associated Mini-mart, a Drive-thru Fast Food Restaurant, and a Car Wash (the "Project'); and, WHEREAS, said .plans for development have been recommended for approval, subject to conditions, by said Committee and Commission; and, WHEREAS, the AGENCY has considered the Design Review Committee's and the Planning Commission's recommendation and has approved the Project and design plans subject to certain terms and conditions; and, WHEREAS, the AGENCY desires that said Project be implemented and completed as soon as it is practicable in accordance with the terms of this Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, the AGENCY and the DEVELOPER agree as follows: 1. The property to be developed is described as Assesso(s Parcel Numbers 629-130-30 located at the Southeast Corner of Main Street and Mace Street 1n the City of Chula Vista, CA., shown on locator map attached hereto as Exhibit "cn and by this reference incorporated herein ("Property'). 2. The DEVELOPER covenants and agrees by and for himself, his heirs, executors, administrators and assigns and all persons claiming under or through them the following: A. DEVELOPER shall develop the Property with the Project in with the AGENCY approved development proposal attached hereto as Exhibit "A". B. DEVELOPER shall obtain all necessary federal/state and local governmental permits and approvals and abide by all applicable federal, state and local laws, regulations, policies and approvals in connectian with the development of the Project. DEVELOPER and AGENCY further agree that this Agreement is con~gent upon DEVELOPER securing said permits and .;; -8 - - approvals. DEVELOPER shall pay all applicable development impact and processing fees. AGENCY agrees to reasonably cooperate with DEVELOPER in processing all permits required in connection with the development of the Project. C. DEVELOPER shall obtain building permits within one year from the date of this Agreement and to actually develop the Property wjth the Project withjn one year from the date of issuance of the building permits. In the event DEVELOPER fails to meet these deadlines, the Agency's approval of DEVELOPER's development proposals shall be void and this Agreement shall have no further force or effect. D. In all deeds granting or conveying an interest in the Property, the following language shall appear: "The grantee herein covenants by and for himse/~ his heirs, executors, administrators and assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation o~ any person or group of persons on account of race, co/o~ creed, national origin or ancestry in the sale, lease, sublease, transfe~ use, occupancy, tenure, or enjoyment of the premises herein conveyed, nor shall the grantee himself or any persons claiming under or through him establish or permit any such practice of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection, location, number, use or occupancy of tenants, lessees, subtenant lessees, or vendees in the premises herein conveyed. The foregoing covenants shall run with the land. " E. In all leases demising an interest in all or any part of the Property, the following language shall appear. "The lessee herein covenants by and for himse/~ his heirs, executors, administrators and assigns, and all persons claiming under or through him, and this lease is made and accepted upon and subject to the following condmons: That there shall be no discrimination against or segregation o~ any person or group of persons, on account of race, colo~ creed, national origin, or ancesúy, in the leasing, subleasing, transferring use, occupancy, tenure, or enjoyment of the premises herein leased, nor shall the lessee himself or any persons claiming under or through him, establish or permit any such practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection, location, number or use, or occupancy of tenants, lessees, sublessees, subtenants, or vendees in the premises herein leased." 3. The Property shall be developed subject to the conditions imposed by the Design Review Committee, the Planning Commission, and the AGENCY as described in Exhibit "B" attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. DEVELOPER acknowledges the validity of and agrees to accept such conditions. 4. DEVELOPER shall maintain the premises in FIRST CLASS CONDITION. A. DUTY TO MAINTAIN FIRST CLASS CONDITION. Throughout the term of this Agreement, DEVELOPER shall, at DEVELOPER's sole cost and expense, maintain the Property which includes all improvements thereon in first class condition and repair, and in accordance with all applicable laws, permits, licenses and other governmental authorizations, rules, õ2 -IS- - - .' ordinances, orders, decrees and regulations now or hereafter enacted, issued or promulgated by federal, state, county, municipal, and other governmental agencies, bodies and courts having or claiming jurisdiction and all their respective departments, bureaus, and officials. If the DEVELOPER fails to maintain the Property in a 'first class condition', the Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista or its agents shall have the right to go on the Property and perform the necessary maintenance and the reasonable cost of said maintenance shall become a lien against the Property. The Agency shall have the right to enforce this lien either by foreclosing on the Property or by forwarding the amcunt to be collected to the Tax Assessor who shall make it part of the tax bill. B. DEVELOPER shall promptly and diligently repair, restore, alter, add to, remove, and replace, as required, the Property and all improvements to maintain or comply as above, or to remedy all damage to or destruction of all or any part of the improvements. Any repair, restoration, alteration, addition, removal, maintenance, replacement and other act of ccmpliance under this Paragraph (hereafter collectively referred to as 'Restoration') shall be compieted by DEVELOPER whether or not funds are available from insurance proceeds or subtenant contributions. C. In order to enforce all above maintenance provisions, the parties agree that the Community Development Director is empowered to make reasonable determinations as to whether the Property is in a first class condition. If he determines it is not, he (1) will notify the DEVELOPER in writing and (2) extend a reasonable time to cure. If a cure or substantial progress to cure has not been made within that time, the Director is au1horized to effectuate the cure by City forces or otherwise after written notice to Developer that City forœs will be making such cure, the ccst of which will be promptly reimbursed by the DEVELOPER. In the event that there is a dispute over whether the Property is in a first class condition or over the amount of work and expense authorized by the Director to cure, the parties agree that the City Manager of the City of Chula Vista ("Manager') or his designee, shall resoive that dispute and both parties shall be bound by the Manager's decision, which shall specify findings offacl. D. FIRST CLASS CONDITION DEFINED. First class condition and repair, means which is necessary to keep the Property an efficient and attractive condition, at least substantially equal in quality to the ccndition which exists when the Project has been ccmpleted, nomial wear and tear excepted, in accordance with all applicable laws and ccnditions. 5. AGENCY and DEVELOPER agree that the ccvenants of the DEVELOPER expressed herein shall run with the land. DEVELOPER shall have the right, without prior approval of AGENCY, to assign its rights and delegate its duties under this Agreement 6. AGENCY and DEVELOPER agree that the covenants of the DEVELOPER expressed herein are for the express benefit of the AGENCY and for all owners of real property within the boundaries of the PROJECT AREA as the same now exists or may be hereafter amended. AGENCY and DEVELOPER agree that the provisions of this Agreement may be specifically enforced in any ccurt of competent jurisdiction by the AGENCY on its own behalf or on behalf of any owner of real property within the boundaries of the PROJECT AREA. Except for the Agency, however, no owner of real property within the boundaries of the Project Area shall have the right to enforce any of the provisions of this Agreement independently. 7. AGENCY and DEVELOPER agree that this Agreement may be recorded by the AGENCY in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County, California. 02 - S"- - - .' 8. DEVELOPER shall and does hereby agree to indemnify, protect, defend and hold hannless AGENCY and the City of Chula Vista, and their respective Council members, officers, employees, agents and representatives, from and against any and all liabilities, losses, damages, demands, claims and casts, including court costs and reasonable attomeys' fees {collectively, "liabilities"} incurred by the AGENCY arising, directly or indirectly, from (a) AGENCY's approval of this Agreement, (b) AGENCY's or City's approval or issuance of any other pennit or act jon, whether discretionary or non.djscretionary, in connection with the Project contemplated herein, and (c) DEVELOPER's construction and operatian of the Project pennitted hereby. 9. In the event of any dispute between the parties with respect to the obligations under this AGREEMENT that results in litigation, the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover its reasonable attorney's fees and court costs from the non-prevailing party. 10. Time is of the essence for each and every obligation hereunder. 11. If DEVELOPER fails to fulfill its obligations hereunder after due notice and reasonable opportunity to cure, DEVELOPER shall be in default hereunder, and in addition to any and all other rights and remedies AGENCY may have, at law or in equity, AGENCY shall have the right to tenninate its approval of the Project and this Agreement. Signature Page Follows óJ - f'Î - .,. Signature Page IN WITNESS WHEREOF THE PARTIES HAVE ENTERED INTO THIS AGREEMENT EFFECTIVE AS OF THE DATE FIRST WRITTEN ABOVE. REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA "AGENCY" DATED: By: Shirley Horton, Chairman "DEVELOPER" ~ DATED: \. - b - () (; By: " . / ;{itJ11Q .,¿",... , I nI, PH. ., residen NOTARY: Please attach acknowledgment carel. APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: John M. Kaheny, Agency Attorney ól-f8' . -,-~ , , , .. 'i'.- W¡I!I,'nl' 'il .il ~ l\ii',..:1 IIX! ~d il- i¡1 'III II ¡all i' !!'f!liB:i ill.1 11 =:ì Exibit A 11!1!!ì!III!!I-I;!~¡;!~i;I¡~m~I!~¡!I,I; 11!';i! page 1 ,III ¡, i.i III II ¡¡'I ¡i .Ii. II".! ~ II i' Iî~ '¡'i-!I J '¡: Hi i: i. i! il ill ,ill! j iØ I'i: ~: !li!!I~PiPi¡l¡ i¡ I II; ~':' I I ~--~ - - - q>;- M-A<:E """RE-E~ - - - I - d .or ;~ .~ "or I :1," I II-I'\. I-I It . ~""... - - I ¡ ~... I P d ,. I~ ,. I ~ .. . . §IIIII [ Iii ii I" ¡ . I I ! I I :1 I I ~. I g 'I . b II . I' ~~ I ~-r- I - I . ¡¡,I I -:"=- I~ 1>-- II II ~: !Í'III ::, 111;1111111'llilllll'"lllill'IIII;-IIIII'!lil¡iilll'li;'IIIP!.!III'~ 11!111111'¡!11~ ,I ;1!jJ¡~'II:III-J,,:IIIIIIIIIIJIIiSi'illIl'lI,11 J'ftl.:!II,lft t hll ~ j i! i~Wi p!,:IIB!:!! II m~ I': I 'I III hI I~ I ~W :1111 ~ .;~i~~I~r!.I"¡I¡PI!i"l~q!ì,!il;" 1I,.,',i:' li¡I¡llqll§ -I' S~lqlJ f "¡'llllpl" fl', cc' ¡. . II I ,-d!,~ ~!191!i!ld¡!~ì!!!!-!!'~IIHPI¡ íil~I¡I¡¡iíll¡.¡¡ O' , I ~l¡'1 I. I ¡ ,,~"" " " . ~ ~" ! J . I' iì 02 - i'1 J CONDITIONAL lIE PERMIT .......... 1IJ2I/IO '" 10 - -. .. . «-'_4 Exibit A page 2 ! > ¡;; "1 11111 Iii Ii I H~ " I !'I I II II . ") I ¡:, lTl',ti ~ II I It ë~11 [!] III ~:!I!:I' 11111::11:::1111' ~: .~i!Glf II~i:~llljI,IIlIi"'lilllfj f. "e~~ III I Ii l .fr I: " !¡u~ IfH"'" ,,11""""\¡if ! ,4- '! ~~~!IB' ~-9o . COItD<TQW. \JOE PEJMT p"""",,", - ... OJ . __4 Exibit A page 3 ~ II I: I - - - - - - - - ~-M>'<CE-S-TReET- - - I I -- I 0 : 1 ¡ : ~ :~ ~ m .~ ~ . I . . t . ~ . ~ ~~ ~ ~~ ~ 11111 ì' Iii Ii I I'li :: I . I I II !'¡ :: I :1 1 I I' I: I : I I I I ¡II I q , I 'thl;~ ~ .! ~I s,r ,iI!!!!. I.-$-. " ;;~I.IJ "'-°1 . '"-~< CK 7 - ... PEllMIT P.....- 1tI2II1I8 10" 10 . ~ - ~ , i ~ ~ II Ii I . . I I' I , EXl bl t A i 'I'I I ~ II ~ page 4 I, ~ :; , ! . . 'I II 1,1 , ¡ . , I I q . ., I P§ K !Z s -~ 3 ~~ ~ ~~ : ~ IIglU11i M ¡g ¡ni"fI!1 g ~ 'II I i If H~ ~ ¡ II " ~ ~ I ~ I ~ , ! Ii (p i ~ " 5 I~ ~ 11111 ~ I,.~,I ,-, I or I li!¡:, ¡it i I I .~~-~~~ I .~ ,~ 'X ,-, .~,~. .¡ .~ J - ,~ r I I I I I I II!~ I I I I ~~ p~ -; . ~§ I~H ~ '.U5 II ~ ~~ Z :Í'I!I J I II [!] ,~¡~I aIr 'i,I~~11 h s:u r~ tCoJ I U" " f! ~~u I J .;J . 92- CONIXT1CIW. UIE ......., ........... - ..... -- ---- . ~ -, ~ Exibit A - "::' ,,-< .'- w~M ,<-< ... page 5 ¿f t I @[] 0 e e e Sê ~ ;¡; , ~z " ..., , 5 0 :.> " ¡: - z , -, I ' I ¡ (¡ I ~ I . I ' , I§ I " -111111 . I Ii ill I I II ¡ I I I I ! I I I II I . (¡ liÿ -: I~ I @@~(jØ I ill ~ti E~ !'ii19 I II I II fjl ,,- ~.;A ~ w~ ,~h! alf f if HU ~f ¡! ~"U I J 0<' - 93 """"""'" \lIE PERMIT ........... 12l11li8 ... 10 . - ~ " "'" , 1 o¡ :~ I'. I (8 B..! 'II Ii Exibit A -..,.. rD" . a:: II t I ' page 6 0 "" ~ I ~lIr ! E~I "'. ri D' s! II I .,,', ,¿ I' . ED! ! ; .[~d i: ~ ¡¡ q i! Iii s~ ~[ii'D IIII I'" [:II ~ ~~: IIII~ en I! g ~ , "3 :g I . ~ ¡;¡ 11= , II ~ . r z 1:ltl'!f'II~ iir~ PTI!! I: ~ II ,If'i", ", ' f , I' .., II ~ !Inl';;' ;;. I = II ~ II ~ l'II'~!O"o: ~~ "Ih ; III I I I Ii 11 OM ø~ h II '-'UII! III:! liW'!f!!I~ ~ ~~ Ihl I,~ !I,llf,¡), ¡¡¡ 'II. tt, 'I 'I'" " I.,' n' 1,1 II, ,Ii c: ,~ II: i¡1 IUlifl I ¡;; ~ s~ ~¡; ~êj ¡- '" 0 0 .., ." - ¡; I z I I -, g I ¡- -Ii 'II ,- - . I !q I '~~'I I I ~j.~~ I ë. I [!],~ Ih5~ q~;! ",I ~ !i~i;~ -I'>.I~ -" 1, ~IS;U'JI e.-" -' ~~~~~ , ! g;l ~ 'I' , I. '! ~~¡! .. 02-9~ CONDIT1CfW. UIE - PAClWlE 12I21l1O ... 10 ---~ - - . - - .,~ MAIN ST. . ¡, ~Iilill ----------- ¡ 1:lII¡~ ft" ExibitA I II ~ r page 7 IIlp !! q, ! II i ~ n ! ~ j I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ of!! , Ie ~ : ~ ~ ,.. 1I!l11i1l1 ~ ~ ~~ I ~ Ii ! II J I I ¡; .. ~;¡ Ipl;lIH ~ .. I I It j! g I" , I I~ h I '> II !~ I' I ( " i ,~ I ~ I. I ! I ! '1 , , ~ ~ . '" "UIII !E ¡ Iii Ii i"" !' I ¡ ¡~ I I I: I I ~ ¡jj I l.. i '1" '1" Iì'.~ I z !~ !!It: I ~~ I'I~ ili ~~ ~ .. d~ I i ~19 II r .. I' ¡;; II i 00 ; ë~11 air ~ , i ~! ¡II ~ !I~'I '1i~"IBIi li;~ " !~ ..~ i I .! ~"i! J 02 - <1 s- - UIE ....... p- -- ... WI .- -, .'4 1i~~llli1 I I' .' MACE ST .. 'III I ~ ---------.-.:_--- Exlblt A I! ~ ~ ~ page 8 'PI; ~r f, ! \ I'. II II ~n - ~ I . ~ ~ i ~ ~I I! g 111111 i ! I ( ~ "III I ¡; I 'I' Lilli I~ I~ I I P ~~ ~ z I I '¡g ;,¡;j -0 1'1:: . ~ ... -.:::> > II ~ iz I' '" 'en q i ~ !~ I~ ~ I g -e ' -B I i i I , , . . I , -e ~ ~§ ~ f ~ I ., .§ . I ~ . I" ! 9 III . I Iii g ål ~Pli~H~ I '" ." "ïl,.,1 . ~ Ii il¡ liar! !'iiI!I I' fi1 ¡ ~ I I I ~ I h~1 ~ . -IH~!plr iI s;"I'~f I !&æ ~ ,-! ;z ~~I!IJ 0.1-9'- C<>NIIITIOIW. USE ........,. ........., 12I2111III 7 of II - ' - . - - ~ i~~'illl i s: 11'11 ; ~ __~_AC~~T:__- Exibit A . ~ -- page 9 t_-~ ~ ~~ ~ 1I!1: ~ f F' H !! I ¡ . II iI~n i I I ~ !i ; I~ ; ~~ ~ h1 I 1 !I iii II 1 ~ ~ .. c::J ¡ ~ Ii lilli' "¡; ~ It I' I i I ( I . .. .:s I I II j! ~ '~ . ' I ~ c::J. . I I" --'" , . 1--'"> ,~ ~ ~ . I~ I~ II g c::J I ' , i z I~ ( I . ,. I ! I . , -@II , 1- ~ il ~ I 1 'I ", ; ;: ~ f f' I 1 ... ~ rn : -@J !j 1;1 :¡: ~ ~ 0 z ~ I'i il~I'R~P. ! I ~ Illii II Ii II I' !¡!! " ~I .2 - '1 CONDITIONAL U8E""'" """'--1li21liiii ...'" -------~--- . - -.. ~ ~ Exibit A page 10 'I{Í iii ~..; q i'¡ or ¡; jí i;o:q ¡ f t9 ì 11'_-11 'I!', 1~1!11¡!>I'!llllbl !!I!IIi1)!'II¡i'I!IIII~il¡.~¡I'¡! Ili.l~q I!.~I q"q, ,I I I' I' -I - - i li¡I,!I~~:llli'~i ~!llqll - I" I - 'I' II' I 1¡'~II"i~l!í! W-Ièld !¡!~I iil~/!11 li¡'Si~ "~ " I' ii ill 1 I ! II 'Hß ß IT i' '; jil:l.: .:11:,11" 'I' r r ~ III !I I il!!!~~; I -- -0 ~!:J ,> Ii" E ill 'I I, <t: ~ ~ I ., I I I I III I I II. IIJ I ~t~ lair I. I'" - i (i~R~i ~f mø ~ !~S~i I-, I; ,;;~t¡f '; d! I J lë I - - EXHIBIT B Conditions of Approval Owner Participation Agreement Worldwide Petroleum Company 3733 Main Street Chula Vista, CA CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the project landscape and irrigation plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Landscape Planner. 2. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy for the new structures, all landscaping and hardscape improvements shall be installed in accordance with the approved landscape plan. 3. The final landscape plan shall provide for a landscape treatment (vines) for the wall to be located at the south of the site. Said plan shall be reviewed and approved by the City Landscape Planner prior to the issuance of building permits. 4. Construct the project as submitted, unless otherwise modified herein. 5. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Building Division. Said requirements include but are not limited to: a. Submit architectural plans that are stamped and signed by a licensed architect. b. Structural plans and calculations must be stamped and signed by a California Registered Civil/Structural Engineer. c. Project shall comply with 1997 UBC and 1996 NEC. d. Project shall comply with 1998 handicapped accessibility requirements. e. Plans shall indicate type of occupancy. 6. A graffiti resistant treatment shall be specified for and applied to all wall and building surfaces. This shall be noted for any building and wall plans and shall be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director prior to the issuance of building permits. Additionally, the project shall conform with Sections 9.20.055 and 9.20.035 of the CVMC regarding graffiti control. 7. All mitigation measures outlined in the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the project (IS-00-14) shall be complied with to the satisfaction of the Community Development Department's Planning and Environmental Manager in perpetuity. 8. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall obtain a sign permit for all proposed signage. 9. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall dedicate two feet of right-of-way along Main Street. 10. A separate sewer connection shall be required for the car wash area drainage system. 11. Prior to the issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall install a 250 watt street light on Main Street, and a 150 watt street light on Mace Street. 12. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall submit improvement plans which specify and guarantee the completion of the following public improvements: A) Widen Main Street to 41 feet centerline to curb for the 53 foot half of the street right-of-way. B) Construct curb, gutter, and 8-foot-wide sidewalk along the entire Main street Frontage. r:2 - 9' - - EXHIBIT B Conditions of Approval Owner Participation Agreement Worldwide Petroleum Company 3733 Main Street Chula Vista. CA C) Widen Mace Street to 26 feet centerline to curb for the 36 foot of the street right-of-way. D) Construct curb, gutter, and 5-foot-wide sidewalk along the entire Mace Street frontage. E) Construct driveway approaches per Chula Vista Construction Standard No.1. F) Construct pedestrian ramp per ADA Standards as southeast comer of the intersection of Main Street and Mace Street. 13. Driveway approaches must meet all applicable City of Chula Vista standards and must be 8 feet minimum from the Point of Curb Return (PCR). 14. If the total on-site excavation exceeds the amount permitted without a grading permit as prescribed by the City of Chula Vista Grading Ordinance Number 1797 Section 15.04.150, applicant shall apply for and obtain a grading permit prior to the commencement of grading. 15. The applicant shall address all other comments noted in the Engineering Department Memorandum dated January 19, 2000 attached as Exhibit C of the Special Use Permit Resolution for this project. 16. Project plans shall be subject to the review and approval of the City of Chula Vista Fire Department. 17. The applicant shall comply with all recommendations of the City of Chula Vista Crime Prevention Unit as shown in memorandum attached as Exhibit C of the Special Use Permit Resolution for this project. 18. No floor displays of beer allowed. All alcohol must be displayed in the cooler area. 19. Locks shall be installed and maintained on cooler doors where alcohol will be displayed. The cooler doors shall be locked after 12 mid-night until 6 a.m. in the morning. 20. Wine shall not be sold in bottles or containers smaller than 750 milliliters. Wine-coolers shall not be sold in units of less than a four pack. 21. Alcohol sales shall be permitted only between the hours of 6 a.m. and 12 mid-night. 22. The applicant shall comply with all requirements of the Sweetwater Authority as described in letter attached as Exhibit C of the Special Use Permit Resolution for this project. 23. Prior to the issuance of building permits, the applicant shall pay all required school fees. 24. The Special Use Permit issued on this project shall become void and ineffective if not utilized or extended w~hin one year from the effective date thereof, in accordance with Section 19.14.260 of the Municipal Code. 25. That further consideration be given to the possibility of installing a median on Main Street as well as enhanced traffic control for pedestrian crossing at the intersection of Mace and Main Streets. 26. That specification be given as to where the vacuums for the car wash will be located. 27. That enhanced measures for removing excess water on the vehicles exiting the car wash be provided. 0; -100 - - EXHIBIT B Conditions of Approval Owner Participation Agreement Worldwide Petroleum Company 3733 Main Street Chula Vista, CA 28. That a condition be jncluded specifyjng requirements for landscapjng, signage and on-site maintenance, 29. That the signage conform to the sign ordinance and any redevelopment design guidelines and goals envisioned for that area. The signage should be consistent with other new developments which do not include pole signs. 30. That landscaping and street improvements be consistent with the long term objectives of the Montgomery Redevelopment Area Plan with respect to street landscape design and traffic control measures 31. That a condition be included stating that the car wash will have a "striper' (air-blower). 32. That the hours of operation be clearly defined in the conditions of approval. 33. That prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy for new structures all State, Federal and local permits will have been received as required by that particular law or regulation. ~'\HOME\COMMOEVITAPIA\OPASIMAIN& MACE OPA (J." ,. 2000902'"11 02-10 I - - Exibit C LOCATOR :~~¿I~: ALiAMANI, PresidentolWPC PRaJECT DESCRIPTlaN: C) SPECIAL USE PERMIT PRaJECT 3733 Main Street ADDRESS: Request: Proposed 3,352 square loot 24 hour, food mart and a detached 1,248 foot self-serve car wash. SCALE: I FILE NUMBER: NORTH No Scale SUPS - 00-05 h:\home\planning\hectar\locators\supsOOO5.cdr 01/t1/00 02 -10 "- - -