HomeMy WebLinkAbout2007/02/20 Agenda Packet
I declare under penalty of perjury that I am
employed by the City of Chula Vista in the
Office of the City Clerk and that I posted th).s I'
document on the bulletin board accord~, f t.-
rown Act reqUirements. ::::~ ~
... IL~? .~/li1lLl., ....,~~~
d ,&..- v"lJ Signed ~ ~ ~ -..;:
ellY OF
CHULA VISTA
Cheryl Cox, Mayor
Rudy Ramirez, Councilmember Jim Thomson, Interim City Manager
John McCann, Councilmember Ann Moore, City Attorney
Jerry R. Rindone, Councilmember Susan Bigelow, City Clerk
Steve Castaneda, Councilmember
February 20, 2007
6:00 P.M.
Council Chambers
City Hall
276 Fourth Avenue
CALL TO ORDER
ROLL CALL: Councilmembers Castaneda, McCann, Ramirez, Rindone, and Mayor Cox
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG AND MOMENT OF SILENCE
SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY
. PRESENTATION BY MAYLIN CHAVEZ, PROJECT COORDINATOR FOR THE
TOBACCO PROJECT AT THE INSTITUTE FOR PUBLIC STRATEGIES,
RECOGNIZING THE CITY COUNCIL AND THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA FOR
BEING THE FIRST IN THE COUNTY TO IMPLEMENT SMOKE FREE PATIOS,
SMOKE FREE PARKS, AND THE 50 FOOT SMOKING BAN AT PUBLIC
ENTRYWAYS
CONSENT CALENDAR
(Items 1 through 8)
The Council will enact the Consent Calendar staff recommendations by one
motion, without discussion, unless a Councilmember, a member of the public, or
City staff requests that an item be removed for discussion. If you wish to speak on
one of these items, please fill out a "Request to Speak" form (available in the
lobby) and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Items pulled from the
Consent Calendar will be discussed immediately following the Consent Calendar.
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES of an Adjourned Regular Meeting of January 15, 2007.
Staff recommendation: Council approve the minutes.
2. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
A. Memorandum from Councilmember McCann, requesting an excused absence
from the Council Meeting of February 13, 2007.
Staff recommendation: Council excuse the absence.
3. A. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ESTABLISHING A FOUR-HOUR
PARKING LIMIT ALONG LAZO COURT AND UPDATING SCHEDULE VI OF
THE REGISTER MAINTAINED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER TO
INCLUDE THIS TIME-LIMITED PARKING ZONE (SECOND READING)
B. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PROHIBITING PARKING ALONG
LAZO COURT FROM 2:00 AM TO 6:00 AM AND UPDATING SCHEDULE IV OF
THE REGISTER MAINTAINED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CITY ENGINEER TO
INCLUDE THIS PARKING RESTRICTION ZONE (SECOND READING)
Adoption of the ordinances will establish four-hour time-limited parking and posting of
"No Parking 2:00 A.M. to 6:00 A.M." signs along Lazo Court. These ordinances were
introduced on February 13, 2007. (City Engineer)
Staff recommendation: Council adopt the ordinances.
4. A. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ESTABLISHING THE SPEED
LIMIT ON FIRST AVENUE BETWEEN PALOMAR STREET AND QUINTARD
STREET AT 25 MPH (SECOND READING)
B. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ESTABLISHING THE SPEED LIMIT ON FIRST AVENUE BETWEEN QUINTARD
STREET AND SOUTHERN TERMINUS OF FIRST A VENUE AT 25 MPH (SECOND
READING)
Adoption of the ordinance will provide that a speed limit of 25 mph be established and
posted at these locations. These ordinances were introduced on February 13, 2007. (City
Engineer)
Staff recommendation: Council adopt the ordinances.
5. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO.
2892 RELATING TO PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE AND
AREA OF BENEFIT FOR OTAY RANCH VILLAGES ONE, FIVE, AND SIX TO
INCLUDE VILLAGE TWO TO PAY FOR PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE IMPROVEMENTS
AS A CONDITION OF ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS (SECOND READING)
Adoption of the ordinance amends Pedestrian Bridge Ordinance No. 2892, to include
Village Two to pay for their fair share of bridge improvements. The fee is payable at
issuance of building permits. This ordinance was introduced on February 13,2007. (City
Engineer)
Staff recommendation: Council adopt the ordinance.
Page 2 - Council Agenda
httn:/ /www.chulavistaca.gov
February 20, 2007
6. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
APPROVING AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND THE
METROPOLITAN TRANSIT SYSTEM (MTS) AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR
TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT
City Transit staff notified Council of staffs participation with the Metropolitan Transit
System (MTS) in a joint procurement process for the operation of Chula Vista Transit
(CVT) and maintenance of the CVT bus fleet in January of 2006. The request for
proposals was issued and the proposals received were evaluated and ranked, followed by
negotiations with one firm. Adoption of the resolution approves a Memorandum of
Understanding outlininf; each agency's responsibilities regarding the new bus operation
contract between the City and MTS and authorizes the mayor to execute said agreement.
(Public Works Operations Director)
Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution.
7. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
APPROPRIATING $151,000 FROM THE AVAILABLE BALANCE OF THE
GENERAL FUND AND ESTABLISHING NEW CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
PROJECT NO. DRI74 (DRAINAGE FACILITIES ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY AND
PERMITS), AWARDING THE CONTRACT TO WHITNEY ENVIRONMENTAL
CONSULTING, INC. (DBA FOOTHILL ASSOCIATES) TO PERFORM THE
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES RELATED TO OBTAINING PERMITS FOR THE
MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATED WITH SEVERAL OF THE CITY'S
DRAINAGE FACILITIES; AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE
AGREEMENT (4/5THS VOTE REQUIRED)
Several drainage facilities in the City are in need of maintenance. These activities require
authorizations from various state and federal agencies. Adoption ofthe resolution creates
a new capital improvement project to fund the processmg of the state and federal
authorizatIOns and preparation of the supporting enviromnental studies, approves a
contract with Foothill Associates to provide enviromnental services related to obtaining
the necessary authorizations, and authorizes the Mayor to execute the agreement. (Public
Works Operations Director)
Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution.
8. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ACCEPTING AND APPROPRIATING $80,285 IN UNANTICIPATED REVENUES
A WARDED TO THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, AS THE LEAD AGENCY FOR THE
SOUTH BAY USED OIL RECYCLING PROGRAM FROM THE CALIFORNIA
INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT BOA~'S USED MOTOR OIL
RECYCLING BLOCK GRANT FOR 2006-2007, 12 H CYCLE (4/5THS VOTE
REQUIRED)
The California Used Oil Enhancement Act (1999) requires the collection of four cents for
every quart of lubricating oil sold, transferred and imported into California from oil
manufacturers, and Chula Vista consumers pay four cents per quart into the fund when
they purchase oil. The Act mandates that the California Integrated Waste Management
Board (CIWMB) use a portion of the funds to provide block grants to local governments
for used oil programs that encourage used oil and oil filter recycling. Chula Vista is the
lead af;ency for the Used Oil Recycling Program for the South Bay cities of Chula Vista,
Impenal Beach and National City. Adoption of the resolution accepts and appropriates
$80,285 in unanticipated revenues awarded to the City of Chula Vista from the CIWMB.
(General Services Director)
Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution.
Page 3 - Council Agenda
hllD:/Iwww.chulavistaca.gov
February 20, 2007
ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Persons speaking during Public Comments may address the Council/Authority on
any subject matter within the Council/Authority's jurisdiction that is not listed as
an item on the agenda. State law generally prohibits the Council//Authority from
taking action on any issue not included on the agenda, but, if appropriate, the
Council/Agency/Authority may schedule the topic for future discussion or refer
the matter to staff. Comments are limited to three minutes.
ACTION ITEMS
The Item listed in this section of the agenda will be considered individually by the
Council/Authority, and is expected to elicit discussion and deliberation. If you
wish to speak on any item, please fill out a "Request to Speak" form (available in
the lobby) and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting.
9. CONSIDERATION OF FORMATION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA HEALTH
CARE COMMISSION
At the meeting of January 9, 2007, the City Council directed staff to investigate the
appropriate role and function of a City Health Care Commission for the purpose of
assisting regional efforts to provide a strong health care infrastructure for the South Bay.
(City Manager)
Staff recommendation: Council approve the concept, and provide additional direction to
staff for drafting of an Ordinance by the City Attorney's office.
10. CONSIDERATION OF APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS FROM THE PUBLIC
FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE FUND FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF
PHASE 3 OF THE CIVIC CENTER RENOVATION PROJECT
In July of 2001, the Council approved a master plan for the renovation of the Civic
Center, and in February of2003, they approved a Design Build Agreement with Highland
Partnership, Inc. to design and construct the project. In August of 2004, the Council
approved the Guaranteed Maximum Price of the project at $38,346,000, which reflects
the amount to be paid to the design builder for design and construction. The total project
budget approved by Council in August 2004 was $50,148,000. Adoption of the
resolution appropriates the funds to construct the third and final phase of the project in
accordance with the previous Council actions. (General Services Director/Finance
Director)
Staffrecommendation: Council adopt the following resolution:
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
APPROPRIATING FUNDS FROM THE PUBLIC FACILITIES
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE FUND FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF
PHASE 3 OF THE CIVIC CENTER RENOVATION PROJECT (GG-300)
(4/5THS VOTE REQUIRED)
Page 4 - Council Agenda
hlt1>:llwww.chulavistaca.gov
February 20, 2007
OTHER BUSINESS
11. CITY MANAGER'S REPORTS
12. MAYOR'S REPORTS
. South Bay Power Plant Council Subcommittee report requesting Council support of
the subcommittee's recommendations regarding the LS Power application; the
Port/LS Power lease; and establishing March 15, 2007 at 6:00 p.m., as a time to
conduct a workshop regarding energy issues.
13. COUNCIL COMMENTS
. Councilmember Ramirez: Discussion on making the City Manager deliberations in
public.
CLOSED SESSION
Announcements of actions taken in Closed Session shall be made available by
noon on Wednesday following the Council Meeting at the City Attorney's office in
accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code 54957. 7).
14. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 54957(b)(I)
Title: City Manager
15. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT
CODE 54957.6(a)
Unrepresented employee:
City Manager
16. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - ANTICIPATED LITIGATION
SIGNIFICANT EXPOSURE TO LITIGATION PURSUANT TO SUBDIVISION (b) OF
GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54956.9
. Six cases
ADJOURNMENT to the Regular Meeting of February 27, 2007 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council
Chambers.
In compliance with the
AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
The City of Chula Vista requests individuals who require special accommodations to access, attend,
and/or participate in a City meeting, activity, or service request such accommodation at least forty-eight
hours in advance for meetings and five days for scheduled services and activities. Please contact the City
Clerk for specific information at (619) 691-5041 or Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf (TDD) at
(619) 585-5655. California Relay Service is also available for the hearing impaired.
Page 5 - Council Agenda
htto:/ /www.chulavistaca.gov
February 20, 2007
DRAFT
MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE
CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
January 15, 2007
6:00 P.M.
An Adjourned Regular Meeting of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista was called to
order at 9:43 a.m. in the Council Chambers, located in City Hall, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula
Vista, California.
ROLL CALL:
PRESENT: Councilmembers: Castaneda (arrived at 10:00 a.m.), McCann, Ramirez,
Rindone and Mayor Cox
ABSENT: Councilmembers: None
ALSO PRESENT: City Attorney Moore, and Senior Deputy City Clerk Peoples
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG AND MOMENT OF SILENCE
PUBLIC COMMENTS
There were none.
CLOSED SESSIONS
Council convened in closed session at 9:44 a.m.
1. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 54957(b)(1)
Title: City Manager
No reportable action was taken.
2. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT
CODE SECTION 54957.6(a)
Unrepresented employee:
City Manager
This item was not discussed.
ADJOURNMENT
At 6:30 p.m., Mayor Cox adjourned the meeting to the Regular Meeting on January 16, 2007, at
6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers.
CXfu~~~
Lori Anne Peoples, MMC, Senior Deputy City Clerk
,
City of Chula Vista
COUNCILMEMBER JOHN McCANN
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
TO:
FROM:
CC:
SUBJECT:
February 13, 2007
Honorable Mayor and Council
Councilmember John McCann
City Clerk and City Manager
Design District
Please excuse my absence for the following:
I will be out of town on Thursday, February 8th and will be unable to attend the
CVRC scheduled meeting. I will also be unavailable due to medical reasons for
the February 13th City Council meeting.
Councilman John McCann
JM:ag
'2-A
ORDINANCE NO. D\NG t>.ND t>.DO?i\ON
aND Rf.r>:
ORDINANCE OF THE tlTY COUNCIL'26f THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ESTABUSHING A FOUR-HOUR PARKING
LIMIT ALONG LAZO CbURT
WHEREAS, pLlrsuant to authority under the Chula Vista Municipal Code, the City
Engineer had determined that a four-hour Rarking limit shall be established on Lazo Court; and
WHEREAS, heavy trucks and recr~ational vehicles park on Lazo Court on a regular basis
compromising the safety and aesthetic at this location; and
WHEREAS, the Lazo COUli busiqess owners have requested that City install signs to
limit parking for a maximum period of fou~ hours on Lazo Court; and
WHEREAS. the Safety Commissiqn has concurred with staff recommendation to install
these time-limited parking signs; and
WHEREAS, this recommendation 'Ind oth<:t information in the City Engineer's report has
been fully considered by the City Coullcil; ,
NOW, THEREFORE, th<: City Coullcil of the City ofChula Vista ordains as follows:
SECTION I: That a four-hour parking li&iit on Lazo Court from Paseo Del Rey to end of the
cul-de-sac is established.
SECTION II: That Sch<:dule VI of a Regiister of Schedules maintained by the City Engineer as
provid<:d in S<:ction 10.52.330 of the Chulh Vista Municipal Code. "Parking - Time Limited on
Certain Streets:' is amended to include the !following information:
,
10.52.330 Schedule VI - Pa~ki",! - Time Limited on Certain Streets
Name of Street Beginning At Ending At Side Duration
Lazo Court Paseo Del Rey Cul-de-sac Both 4 hour
3A-1
SECTION Ill: This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force on the thirtieth day from and
after its adoption.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
.,)"
'--ClL-o- -::1....;
Ann Moore
City Attorney
/1 =r/-.-
"I.(/~..~
Scott Tulloch
City Engineer
I-I ,[Nl iINEE~\Ordil1~n'l:s\OnI2()(J7"2-1)(I-07\()rdinal1c':_(!_;JZ(1 tn Parking. Rl,;visc:d Cl:.dl'lC
3A-2..
""DOt'\\O~
D t\'C.""D\~G. ",,~D
S'C.CO~
ORDINANCE OF THE~' ITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ESTAB ISHING A "NO PARKING FROM
2:00 AM TO 6:00 AM" Z NE ALONG LAZO COURT
ORDINANCE NO.
WHEREAS. pursuant to authority under the Chula Vista Municipal Code, the City
Engineer had determined that a "No Parking from 2 am to 6 am" time-limited parking zone shall
be established on Lazo Court; and '
WHEREAS. heavy trucks and recteational vehicles park overnight on Lazo Court on a
regular basis compromising the safety and ~esthetic at this location; and
WHEREAS. staff concurs with t~ Safety Commission's recommendation to establish
the parking restriction; and
WHEREAS. this recommendation and other information in the City Engineer's report has
been fully considered by the City Council;!
NOW, THEREFORE. the City COI~ncil of the City ofChula Vista ordains as follows:
SECTION I: That a "No Parking from :t a.m. to 6 a.m." zone on Lazo Court from Paseo Del
Rey to end of the cul-de-sac is established.-
SECTION ll: That Schedule IV of a Register of Schedules maintained by the City Engineer as
provided in Section 10.52.290 of the Chul~ Vista Municipal Code. "Parking - Prohibited DUling
Certain Hours on Certain Streets" is amen4ed to include the following information:
10.52.290 Schedule IV - Parkinf! - P10hibiled Dllrinf! Certain HOllrs on Certain Streets
Name of Street Beginning At . Ending At Side Dnration
Lazo Court Paseo Del Rey Cul-de-sac Both 2am - 6am
.
38-1
,
SECTION IJ[: This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force on the thirtieth day from and
after its adoption.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
'.~
Ann Moore
City Attorney
Scott Tulloch
City Engineer
H:\[NU1N EER\Oniinallces\OnJ2007\2-0(A)7\OnlinOlm:~_( La.wit'!) llVemight purkil1g Rcvis~d ec,dlX:
38-2.
'1
j.-/(/~-~
ORDINANI=E NO.
ORDINANCE OF TH~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA! ESTABLISHING THE SPEED
LIMIT ON FIRST AVENUE BETWEEN PALOMAR
STREET AND QUIN1!ARD STREET AT 25 MPH
-,-,n',\
1""\O.O\iU\
,r- ^'-1D f\.\.J '
r-tnIN'c.;i j"'\\.
-Cr,,,\,,, 'FU::"l ,.....~,
s,\.- vV..;.;...t.
WHEREAS, based on the provi5ions of the California Vehicle Code and pursuant
to authority under the Chula Vista Muniicipal Code, the City Engineer has deternlined that
the speed limit on First Avenue betwben Palomar Street and Quintard Street to be 25
mph; and
WHEREAS, the prevailing: speeds, accident history, roadway design
characteristics and land use justify a 25,mph posted speed limit; and
WHEREAS, the Engineering ~nd Traffic Survey was prepared pursuant to all
provisions of the California Vehicle Code and the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control
Devices; and
WHEREAS, the Safety Comll1ission concurs with staffs recommendation to
establish the speed limit on First Aveniue between Palomar Street and Quintard Street at
25 mph; and '
WHEREAS. this recommendation and other information in the City Engineer's
report has been fully considered by the iCity Council.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista ordains as
follows:
SECTION I: That the speed limit on first Avenue between Palomar Street and Quintard
Street is established at 25 mph.
SECTION If: That Schedule X of a! Register of Schedules maintained by the City
Engineer as provided in Section I ~.48.020 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code.
"'Established Speed Limits in Certai'1 Zones-Designated," is amended to include the
following infoonation:
Chula Vista Municipial Code Section 10.48.020 - Schedule X
Established SDeed Limits in Certain Zones
Name of Street Beginning,At Ending At Proposed Speed Limit
First Avenue Palomar Street Quintard Street 25 mph
,
Iff-!
SECTION III: This ordinance shall ta~e effect and be in full force on the thirtieth day
from and after its adoption.
Presented by
Scott Tulloch
City Engineer
Approved as to form by
~(l
Ann Moore
City Attorney
I-I ,\EN<.iINEER\OnJinarH.:.:s\OnJl0()7\1-0(I-07\{)rJinancl:_( first Av~) Speed Est Revised eC.doc
!fA - 2-
.,(,~~
ORDINANCE NO.
r: O'NG N~O AOOP1\ON
SECOND Rc.A \
ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA! ESTABLISHING THE SPEED
LIMIT ON FIRST A:VENUE BETWEEN QUlNTARD
STREET AND SOUtHERN TERMINUS OF FIRST
AVENUE AT 25 MPH!
WHEREAS, based on the provi$ions of the California Vehicle Code and pursuant
to authority under the Chula Vista Municipal Code, the City Engineer has determined that
the speed limit on First Avenue between Quintard Street and Southern Terminus of First
Avenue to be 25 mph; and
WHEREAS, the prevailing: speeds, accident history, roadway design
characteristics and land use justify a 25 Imph posted speed limit; and
WHEREAS, the Engineering and Traffic Survey was prepared pursuant to all
provisions of the California Vehicle Cbde and the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control
Devices; and !
WHEREAS, the Safety Comnjtission concurs with staffs recommendation to
establish the speed limit on First Avenue between Quintard Street and the Southern
Tenllinus of First Avenue at 25 mph; and
WHEREAS, this recommendat~on and other information in the City Engineer's
report has been fully considered by the City CounciL
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista ordains as
follows:
SECTION I: That the speed limit 011 First Avenue between Quintard Street and the
Southern Ternlimls of First Avenue is e~tablished at 25 mph.
SECTION ll: That Schedule X of a Register of Schedules maintained by the City
Engineer as provided in Section I q.48.020 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code,
"Established Speed Limits in Certain Zones-Designated," is amended to include the
following infornlation:
Chula Vista Municip~1 Code Section 10.48.020 - Schedule X
Established' ~need Limits in Certain Zones
Name of Street I Beginning '.<\ot Ending At Proposed Speed Limit
First Avenue I Quintard Street Southern Terminus 25 mph
4-8-1
i
SECTION III: This ordinance shall tate effect and be in full force on the thirtieth day
from and after its adoption. .
Presented by
Scott Tulloch
City Engineer
Approved as to form by
~ -" (J ~
.~-<\., C),--", /"'-"",,~ -
Ann Moore
City Attorney
[-I 'EN(ilNEER\OrdlOanct:s\Ordl007\1-(J6-07\On.lin:lllCI.:J!Fir.sl Ave) Spec:L1 Est Rl:vised ec.uoc
'-/8-'],
P-DO?I\ON
S'C.co~O t\'C.P-O\~G p-~D
ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2892
RELATING TO PED~STRIAN BRIDGE DEVELOPMENT
IMPACT FEE AND! AREA OF BENEFIT FOR OTAY
RANCH VILLAGES pNE, FIVE, AND SIX TO INCLUDE
VILLAGE TWO TO PAY FOR PEDESTRIAN BRIDGE
IMPROVEMENTS AS A CONDITION OF ISSUANCE OF
BUILDING PERMITS.
ORDINAiNCE NO.
WHEREAS, the City's Gener~l Plan Land Use and Public Facilities Elements
require that adequate public facilities ~e available to accommodate increased population
created by new development; and
WHEREAS, the City Councq has determined that new development within
certain areas within the City of Chul~ Vista as identified in this ordinance, will create
adverse impacts on certain existing public facilities which must be mitigated by the
financing and construction of those facilities identified in this ordinance; and
WHEREAS, developers of laJlld within the City are required to mitigate the
burden created by their development by constructing or improving those facilities needed
to provide service to their respecti ve d~velopments or by the payment of a fee to finance
their portion of the total cost of such facilities; and
WHEREAS, development within the City contributes to the cumulative burden on
pedestrian facilities in direct relationship to the amount of population generated by the
development or the gross acreage of the commercial or industrial land in the
development; and
WHEREAS, the goal of the Ottiy Ranch General Development Plan (GDP) is to
organize land uses based upon a vilIage concept to produce a cohesive, pedestrian
fiiendly community, encourage non, vehicular trips and foster interaction amongst
residents; and
WHEREAS, a component ~f the Otay Ranch circulation system is a
comprehensive trail system to provide for non-vehicular alternative modes of
transportation; and
WHEREAS, the Otay Ranch GDP requires a non-auto circulation system, such as
pedestrian walkways and bike paths" shall be provided between villages and, where
appropriate and feasible, grade sep*ated arterial crossings should be provided to
encourage pedestrian activity between yillages; and
5-1
Ordinance No.
Page 2
WHEREAS, the City Council iadopted the Otay Ranch Villages One and Five
Pedestrian Bridge Development Impac~ Fee ("Impact Fee") by Ordinance 2767 ("Ped Dif
Bridge Ordinance") in order to pay fo~ pedestrian bridge facilities that will serve Otay
Ranch Villages One and Five; and,
WHEREAS, the City Council iunended the original Ped Bridge DIF Ordinance
2767 on January 7, 2003, by Ordinance 2892, to include Otay Ranch Village Six to pay
for its fair share of bridge improvemerjts as a condition of issuance of building permits;
and,
WHEREAS, the Conditions ofiApproval for Otay Ranch Village Two tentative
map require that a funding mechanisIin be established to pay for one-half of Village
Two's fair share of bridge improvemenjs; and
WHEREAS, pedestrian faciliti~s have been built, or are proposed, that will
directly connect Villages One, Five, SiX and Two including a continuous village pathway
and cartpath system. The pedestrian fali:ilities cross maj or streets and their use would be
encouraged and facilitated by the provi~ion of over-crossings of these major streets; and
WHEREAS, the completion of the pedestrian bridges in Village Two will
complete the linkage of the pedestrian facilities in Villages One, Five, Six and Two,
serving to enhance overall pedestrian 10jccess in and among these villages and would be
facilitated by including the funding fot the construction of the bridges required by the
Village Two tentative map in current Ilnpact Fee program by: I) amending the per unit
fees payable at issuance of a building permit; 2) revising the facilities to be financed by
the Impact Fee; and 3) revising the temtory to which the Impact Fee is applicable to
include Village Two; and
WHEREAS, the original Ped' Bridge DIF Ordinance used the persons per
dwelling unit rates established in SectiiJn 17.10.040 of Chula Vista Municipal Code for
the various residential land use categqries in deriving the Equivalence Dwelling Unit
ratio upon which the Impact Fee is based; and,
WHEREAS, the person per dw~lling unit rates for Parkland Dedication in Sec.
17.10.040 were modified by Ordinance!No. 2886. The rates for single family went from
3.22 persons per unit to 3.52 persons Iier unit and the multiple-family rates went from
2.21 persons per dwelling units to 2.61 persons per unit. The attached, cluster housing or
planned unit development and the dupl~x categories were deleted from Sec. 17.10.040;
and
WHEREAS, Otay Ranch, Villag~s One, Five, Six and Two are those areas of land
within the City of Chu1a Vista surround~d by Telegraph Canyon Road, Otay Lakes Road,
Heritage Road, Olympic Parkway, La Media Road, Birch Road, and State Route 125.
This area is shown on the map marked Exhibit "2," and included as an attachment to the
City of Chula Vista Pedestrian Bridge peve10pment Impact Fee Report for Otay Ranch
5-2
Ordinance No.
Page 3
Village Two, dated February 13, 2007"on file in the Office of the City Engineer; and
WHEREAS, City Engineerin$ Staff has approved the City of Chula Vista
Pedestrian Bridge Development Impacl Fee Report dated November 6, 1998; the updated
Pedestrian Bridge Development Impact Fee Report for Otay Ranch Village Six dated
December 17, 2002; and the updated Bedestrian Bridge Development Impact Fee Report
for Village Two dated February 13,2067 (the "Report"); and
WHEREAS, the Report, reconlunends pedestrian over-crossing facilities needed
for pedestrian access, and establishes a, fee payable by persons obtaining building permits
for developments within Otay Ranch !Village Two benefiting from the construction of
these facilities; and
WHEREAS, there are four Pedestrian Over Crossings (POC) proposed for the
Otay Ranch Villages One, Five, Six lmd Two: North La Media Bridge POC between
Villages One and Five, South La Medill Road POC between Villages Six and Two, West
Olympic Pkwy Bridge POC between Villages One and Two, and East Olympic Parkway
Bridge poe between Villages Five anel Six; and
WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed
activity for compliance with the Calif~mia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has
determined that the activity is not a "P~oject" as defined under Section 15378 of the State
CEQA Guidelines; therefore, pursuaht to Section I5060( c )(3) of the State CEQA
Guidelines the activity is not subject to'CEQA.
WHEREAS, on February 13, M07, a public hearing was held before the City
Council to provide an opportunity for iinterested persons to be heard on the approval of
the Report and establishment of the ImJilact Fee; and
WHEREAS, the City Council ~etermined, based upon the evidence presented at
the Public Hearing, including, but nOllt limited to, the Report and other information
received by the City Council in the cojrrse of its business, that imposition of the Impact
Fee on all developments within Otay Rianch Villages One, Five, Six and Two in the City
of Chula Vista is necessary in order to protect the public safety and welfare and to ensure
effective implementation of the City's General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the amount of the Impact Fee
levied by this ordinance does not exceed the estimated cost of providing the public
facilities identified by the report.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Councillof the City of Chula Vista does ordain as follows:
SECTION I. Environmental Review
5-3
Ordinance No.
Page 4
The Environmental Review Cqordinator has reviewed the proposed activity for
compliance with the California Enviro/1lIlental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined
that the activity is not a "Project" as ~efined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA
Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines the
activity is not subject to CEQA.
SECTION 2. Acceptance of Reports
The City Council has reviewed the proposed Pedestrian Bridge Development
Impact Fee Report for Otay Ranch Village Two, dated February 13, 2007, and has
accepted the same, by Resolution No. . , in the form on file in the Office of the
City Clerk; the City Council previo*sly reviewed, accepted and adopted Pedestrian
Bridge Development Impact Fee Rep~rts, dated November 6, 1998, and December 17,
2002 (collectively, the "Reports"). .
SECTION 3. Facilities
The facilities to be financed by: the Impact Fee are fully described in the Reports
and incorporated herein by this referepce, ("Facilities"), all of which Facilities may be
modified by the City Council from tim~ to time by resolution. The locations at which the
Facilities will be constructed are sho~ on Exhibit" I" of the approved 2002 and 2007
Reports. The City Council may modiry or amend the list of projects herein considered to
be part of the Facilities by written resolution in order to maintain compliance with the
City's Capital Improvement Program, or to reflect changes in land development and
estimated and actual pedestrian generation.
SECTION 4. Terntory to Which Fee Is Applicable
The area of the City of Chula rvista to which the Impact Fee herein established
shall be applicable is set forth on Etmbit "2" of the 2002 and 2007 Reports and is
generally described herein as the "Terriltory."
SECTION 5. Purpose
The purpose of this ordinance is to establish the Impact Fee in order to provide
the necessary financing to construct ~ Facilities within the areas shown in Exhibit "1"
of the Report, in accordance with the City's General Plan.
SECTION 6. Establishment ofFee
The Impact Fee, to be based on a per Equivalent Dwelling Unit ("EDU") basis,
and payable prior to the issuance of buIlding permits for residential development projects
within the Terntory, is hereby establis~d to pay for the Facilities.
5-4
Ordinance No.
Page 5
SECTION 7. Due on Issuance of Buildlng Permit
The Impact Fee shall be paid irtl cash upon the issuance of a residential building
permit. Early payment is not permitted., No building permit shall be issued for residential
development projects subject to this or\:iinance unless the developer has paid the Impact
Fee imposed by this ordinance. .
SECTION 8. Determination of Equivalent Dwelling Units
Residential land uses shall be :converted to Equivalent Dwelling Units for the
purpose of this fee based on the followipg table:
ee Oy an se
Land Use I1eople per household EOU's
Single Family ("SFO") . 3.52 1
Multi Family ("MF") 2.61 0.74
F b L dU
"Single family" shall mean a residential unit within a subdivision, planning area or
neighborhood with a net density of 8 units per acre or less as shown on the approved
tentative map for said subdivision, pl~ing area or neighborhood.
"Multi-Family" shall mean a resid~ntial unit within a subdivision, planning area or
neighborhood with a net density of gr~ater than 8 units per acre or any residential unit
within a mixed-use project as shown oIl the approved tentative map for said subdivision,
planning area or neighborhood.
SECTION 9. Time to Determine Amount Due; Advance Payment Prohibited
The Impact Fee for each development shall be calculated at the time of building
permit issuance and shall be the amoUnt as indicated at that time and not when the
tentative map or final map was granted or applied for, or when the building permit plan
check was conducted, or when applicatipn was made for the building permit.
SECTION 10. Purpose and Use of Fee
The purpose of the Impact Fee. is to pay for the planning, design, construction
and/or financing (including the cost oUnterest and other financing costs as appropriate)
of the Facilities, or reimbursement to thi: City or, at the discretion of the City if approved
in advance in writing, to other third ~arties for advancing costs actually incurred for
planning, designing, constructing, or fi~ancing the Facilities. Any use of the Impact Fee
shall receive the advance consent of the City Council and be used in a manner consistent
with the purpose of the Impact Fee.
SECTION I I. Amount of Fee; Amendment to Master Fee Schedule
5-5
Ordinance No.
Page 6
The initial Impact Fee shall be! calculated at the rate of $1,114 per Single Family
Dwelling Unit (SFD) and $826 per Mjultiple Family Dwelling Unit (MF). Chapter XVI,
Other Fees, of the Master Fee Schedul~, Section E, shall be amended to read as follows:
"E. Otay Ranch Villages I, 5, 6 and 2 Pedestrian Bridge Development Impact
Fee.
This section is intended to memorialize the key provisions of Ordinance No.
, but said ordinance governs o~er the provisions of the Master Fee Schedule. For
example, in the event of a conflict in iMerpretation between the Master Fee Schedule and
the ordinance, or in the event that thete are additional rules applicable to the imposition
of the Impact Fee, the language of the ~rdinance governs.
a. Territory to which Fee Applicable
The area of the City of ChulaVista to which the Impact Fee herein established
shall be applicable is set forth ip Exhibit "2" of the City ofChula Vista Pedestrian
Bridge Development Impact fee Report for Otay Ranch Village Two dated
February 13, 2007, and is generally described as the area surrounded by
Telegraph Canyon Road, Otay Lakes Road, Heritage Road, Olympic Parkway, La
Media Road, Birch Road, and State Route 125.
b. Rate per Residential Land Use and Fee
The Impact Fee shall be calculated at the rate of $826 per EDU and translated into
a fee per land use based on th+ people per household factor given below, which
rate shall be adjusted from tim~ to time by the City Council.
EDD's
I
0.74
EDU's
$1,114
$826
c. When Payable
The Impact Fee shall be paid: in cash not. later than immediately prior to the
issuance of a building permit." ,
The City Council shall revie~ the amount of the Impact Fee annually or from
time to time. The City Council may, lit such reviews, adjust the amount of this Impact
Fee as necessary to assure construction and operation of the Facilities. The reasons for
which adjustments may be made include, but are not limited to, the following: : (i)
changes in the costs of the Facilities +.S may be reflected by such index as the Council
deems appropriate, such as the En~eering-News Record Construction Cost Index
(ENR-CCI); (ii) changes in the cost of pedestrian bridges; type, size, location or cost of
5-6
Ordinance No.
Page 7
the Facilities to be financed by the Imp~ct Fee; (iii) changes in the land use assumptions
used in the Reports; and (iv) other sound engineering, financing and planning
information. Adjustments to the above Impact Fee may be made by resolution amending
the Master Fee Schedule.
SECTION 12. Authority for Accounting and Expenditures
The proceeds collected from the! imposition of the Impact Fee shall be deposited
into a public facility financing fund (1'Otay Ranch Villages I, 5, 6 and 2 Pedestrian
Bridge Development Impact Fee Fun,jl," or alternatively, "Fund") which is hereby
created and shall be expended only f$r the purposes set forth in this ordinance, the
Director of Finance is authorized to establish various accounts within the Fund for the
Facilities identified in this ordinance and to periodically make expenditures from the
Fund for the purposes set forth herein In accordance with the facilities phasing plan or
capital improvement plan adopted by thlf City Council.
SECTION 13. Findings
The City Council hereby finds the following:
A. The establishment of the I~pact Fee is necessary to protect the public safety
and welfare and to ensure the effective implementation of the City's General
Plan.
B. The Impact Fee is necessary to ensure that funds will be available for the
construction of the Facilities concurrent with the need for these Facilities
and to ensure certainty (n the capital facilities budgeting for growth
impacted public facilities.
C. The amount of the fee k:vied by this ordinance does not exceed the
estimated cost of providing I the Facilities for which the fee is collected.
D. New development project~ within the territory will generate a significant
amount of pedestrian traffi~ that current pedestrian facilities cannot service,
therefore construction of :the Facilities will be needed to service new
development projects.
E. That the legislative finding; and determination set forth in Ordinances 2767
and 2892 continue to be true and correct.
SECTION 14. Impact Fee Additional to pther Fees and Charges
The Impact Fee established by ,this section is in addition to the requirements
imposed by other City laws, policies or regulations relating to the construction or the
financing of the construction of public improvements within subdivisions or
5-7
Ordinance No.
Page 8
developments.
SECTION 15. Mandatory Constructi~n of a Portion of the Facilities; Duty to Tender
Reimbursement Offer
Whenever a developer is requijred as a condition of approval of a development
permit to construct or cause the constnjction of the Facilities or a portion thereof, the City
may require the developer to install :the Facilities according to design specifications
approved by the City and in the size 'or capacity necessary to accommodate estimated
pedestrian traffic as indicated in the! Report and subsequent amendments. If such a
requirement is imposed, the City sh.ll offer, at the City's option, to reimburse the
developer from the Fund either in cashior over time as Fees are collected, or give a credit
against the Impact Fee levied by thi~ ordinance or some combination thereof, in the
amount of the costs incurred by the ~eveloper that exceeds their contribution to such
Facilities as required by this ordinance,i for the design and construction of the Facility not
to exceed the estimated cost of that pajticular Facility as included in the calculation and
updating of the Impact Fee. The City! may update the Impact Fee calculation, as City
deems appropriate prior to making s~ch offer. This duty to offer to give credit or
reimbursement shall be independent ofllie developer's obligation to pay the Impact Fee.
!
SECTION 16. Voluntary Constructio~ of a Portion of the Facilities; Duty of City to
Tender Reimbursement Offer
If a developer is willing and ag~ees in writing to design and construct a portion of
the Facilities in conjunction with the !prosecution of a development project within the
Territory, the City may, as part of a written agreement, reimburse the developer from the
Fund either in cash or over time as Fees are collected, or give a credit against the Impact
Fee levied by this ordinance or some i combination thereof, in the amount of the costs
incurred by the developer that exceeds ~heir contribution to such Facilities as required by
this ordinance, for the design and constiruction of the Facility not to exceed the estimated
cost of that particular Facility as included in the calculation and updating of the Impact
Fee and in an amount agreed to in advance of their expenditure in writing by the City.
The City may update the Impact Fee: calculation, as City deems appropriate prior to
making such offer. This duty to e*tend credits or offer reimbursement shall be
independent of the developer's obligati'ln to pay the Impact Fee.
SECTION 17. Procedure for Entitlemerj.t to Reimbursement Offer
The City's duty to extend a reimbursement offer to a developer pursuant to
Section 15 or 16 above shall be conditIoned on the developer complying with the terms
and conditions of this section:
a. Written authorization shall be requested by the developer from the City and
issued by the City Councili by written resolution before developer may incur
5-8
Ordinance No.
Page 9
any costs eligible for f<limbursement relating to the construction of the
Facilities, excluding any tork attributable to a specific subdivision project.
b. The request for authoriz!jtion shall contain the following information, and
the City may from time tQ time request such other information as:
(I) Detailed descriptions pf the work to be conducted by the developer with
the preliminary cost e~timate.
c. If the Council grants authprization, it shall be by written agreement with the
Developer, and on the following conditions among such other conditions as
the Council may from tim~ to time impose:
(1) Developer shall prepare all plans and specifications and submit same to
the City for approval; :
(2) Developer shall secu* and dedicate any right-of-way required for the
improvement work;
(3) Developer shall secure all required permits and environmental
clearances necessary fbr construction of the improvements;
(4) Developer shall provi~e performance bonds in a form and amount, and
with a surety satisfactory to the City;
(5) Developer shall pay all City fees and costs.
(6) The City shall be helq harmless and indemnified, and upon demand by
the City, defended by! the developer for any of the costs and liabilities
associated with the imjJrovements.
(7) The developer shall a~vance all necessary funds for the improvements,
including design and ~onstruction. The City will not be responsible for
any of the costs of co~tructing the facilities.
(8) The developer shall sepure at least three (3) qualified bids for work to be
done. The constructiOln contract shall be granted to the lowest qualified
bidder. Any claims ror additional payment for extra work or charges
during construction s1l.all be justified and shall be documented to the
satisfaction of the Cityi Engineer.
(9) The developer shall Iirovide a detailed cost estimate, which itemizes
those costs of the coqstruction attributable to the improvements. Soils
Engineering shall be limited to 7.5 percent of the project cost, Civil
Engineering shall be! limited to 7.5 percent of the hard cost and
5-9
Ordinance No.
Page 10
(15)
landscape architectur~ shall be limited to 2 percent of the landscaping
cost. The estimate is ipreliminary and subject to final determination by
the City Engineer upop completion of the Public Facility Project.
(10)
The agreement may! provide that upon determination of satisfactory
incremental completi~n of the public facility project, as approved and
certified by the City Engineer, the City may pay the developer progress
payments in an amou*t not to exceed 75 percent of the estimated cost of
the construction comIlleted to the time of the progress payment but shall
provide in such case for the retention of 25 percent of such costs until
issuance by the City of a Notice of Completion.
(II)
The agreement maYjrOVide that any funds owed to the developer as
reimbursements may e applied to the developer's obligations to pay the
impact Fee for build' g permits to be applied for in the future.
(12)
When all work has b~en completed to the satisfaction of the City, the
developer shall su~mit verification of payments made for the
construction of the pr~ject to the City. The City Engineer shall make the
final determination! on expenditures, which are eligible for
reimbursement.
(13)
After [mal determination of expenditures eligible for reimbursement has
been made by the PuJ:1lic Works Director, the parties may agree to offSet
the developer's duty:to pay Impact Fees required by this ordinance
against the City's dutyl to reimburse the developer.
(14)
After offset, if any funds are due the developer under this section, the
City may at its optioq, reimburse the developer from the Fund either in
cash or over time as! Fees are collected, or give a credit against the
Impact Fee levied by this ordinance or some combination thereof, in the
amount of the costs in~uITed by the developer that exceeds their required
contribution to such !Facilities as required by this ordinance, for the
design and constructi~n of the Facility not to exceed the estimated cost
of that particular Facility as included in the calculation and updating of
the Impact Fee and: in an amount agreed to in advance of their
expenditure in writinglby the City.
A developer may transfer a credit against the Impact Fee to another
developer with the wntten approval of the City Engineer in hislher sole
discretion.
SECTION 18. Procedure for Fee Modification
5-10
Ordinance No.
Page 11
Any developer who, because i of the nature or type of uses proposed for a
development project, contends that application of the Impact Fee imposed by this
ordinance is unconstitutional or urtelated to mitigation of the burdens of the
development, may apply to the City Cbuncil for a waiver or modification of the Impact
Fee or the manner in which it is calcultted. The application shall be made in writing and
filed with the City Clerk not later than fen days after notice is given of the public hearing
on the development permit applicati04 for the project, or. if no development permit is
required, at the time of the filing of thel building permit application. The application shall
state in detail the factual basis for the qlaim of waiver or modification, and shall provide
an engineering and accounting report showing the overall impact on the Development
Impact Fees (DIF) and the ability of th~ City to complete construction of the Facilities by
making the modification requested ~y the applicant. The City Council shall make
reasonable efforts to consider the apElication within sixty days after its filing. The
decision of the City Council shall be ,final. The procedure provided by this section is
additional to any other procedure au~orized by law for protection or challenging the
Impact Fee imposed by this ordinance. ,
SECTION 19. Fee Applicable to Publici Agencies
Development projects by publiclagencies, including schools, shall be exempt from
the provisions of the Impact Fee. '
SECTION 20. Assessment District
If any assessment, communit~ facilities district or special taxing district is
established to design, construct and i pay for any or all of the Facilities ("Work
Alternatively Financed"), the owner or developer of a project may apply to the City
Council for reimbursement from the F~d or a credit in an amount equal to that portion of
the cost included in the calculation' of the Impact Fee attributable to the Work
Alternatively Financed. In this regard, t~e amount of the reimbursement shall be based on
the costs included in the Report, as arrlended from time to time, and therefore, will not
include any portion of the financing COsl:S associated with the formation of the assessment
or other special taxing district.
SECTION 21. Expiration of this Ordinapce
This ordinance shall be of no ifurther force and effect when the City Council
determines that the amount of Impact F~es which have been collected reaches an amount
equal to the cost of the Facilities.
SECTION 22. Time Limit for Judicial Action
Any judicial action or proceediJilg to attack, review, set aside, void or annul this
ordinance shall be brought within the lime period as established by law. In accordance
with Government Code Section 6602Q(d)(I), the ninety-day approval period in which
!
5-1l
Ordinance No.
Page 12
parties may protest begins upon the eff~ctive date of this ordinance.
i
SECTION 23. Other Not Previously D~fined Terms
For the purposes of this ordinaJjtce, the following words or phrases shall be
construed as defined in this Section, un/ess from the context it appears that a different
meaning is intended.
(a) "Building Permit" niJeans a permit required by and issued pursuant to
the Uniform Build~g Code as adopted by reference by this City.
(b) "Developer" means the owner or developer of a development.
(c) "Development Perrnlit" means any discretionary permit, entitlement or
approval for a de*elopment project issued under any zoning or
subdivision ordinan~e of the City.
(d) "Development Project" or "Development" means any activity
described in Sectioni66000 of the State Government Code.
(e) "Single Family Atulched Dwelling" means a single-family dwelling
attached to another ~ingle family dwelling, with each dwelling on its
own lot.
SECTION 24. Effective Date
This ordinance shall become etffective sixty days after its second reading and
adoption.
Presented by
Pipproved as to form by
Scott Tulloch
City Engineer
~ ,'.[iIJ~Quo J
: Moo
. y Attorney
5-12
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA STATEMENT
..s'Yf::. CITY OF
""!: ~- - -- (HUlA VISTA
2/20/2007
Item fll
ITEM TITLE:
Resolution Approving Agreement Between City of
Chula Vista and the Metropolitan Transit System (MTS)
and Authorizing the Mayor to Execute the Agreement
.'RECTORa. PUB~aRKS .....TOaN~/
CITY MANAGER 'J/
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
4fSTHS VOTE: YES
NO X
BACKGROUND
Via an informational memorandum to Council dated January 23, 2006, City
Transit staff notified Council of staffs participation with the Metropolitan Transit
System (MTS) in a joint procurement process for the operation of Chula Vista
Transit (CVT) and maintenance of the CVT bus fleet. The Request for Proposal
(RFP) was issued on March 24, 2006 and proposals were due back on May 3,
2006. The proposals were evaluated and ranked, followed by negotiations with
one firm. A Memorandum of Understanding outlining each agency's
responsibilities regarding the new bus operation contract is ready to be executed.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Not Applicable
RECOMMENDATION
That Council adopt the resolution approving the Agreement between the City and
MTS and authorize the Mayor to execute said agreement.
BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
MTS Board approved Agreement at their meeting of January 18, 2007 by a
unanimous vote of the Board Members present.
DISCUSSION
The last Request for Technical Proposal (RFTP) and price bid for operations of
CVT and maintenance of the CVT fleet was issued in December of 2001. As a
result of the RFTP process, American Transit Corporation (A TC) was selected as
6-1
01/24/2007, Item i.p
Page 2 of4
the CVT contract operator for a five-year term. Our current agreement with A TC
terminates on June 30, 2007.
For the 2001 procurement for CVT services, City Transit staff worked with MTS
staff and followed the MTS two-step low bid process and Scope of Work. This
was done to increase efficiency, reduce staff time and achieve uniformity in the
region's procurement of transit services. Both Transit staffs saw this as an
opportunity to increase cooperation between our respective transit agencies and
reduce procurement costs.
In this current solicitation, MTS combined three of their current transit contracts
with a goal of achieving improved economies of scale and reducing transit cost in
the region. Adding CVT to the larger procurement process increased the
attractiveness and competitiveness of the CVT contract package, which accounts
for 15% of the MTS region's transit contracted services.
In January of 2006, Transit staff received direction from the City Manager's office
to participate in the joint procurement and to inform Council via a memorandum
dated January 23, 2006. This was followed up with a meeting on March 3, 2006
to brief the City Manager on the progress of the procurement process.
Additionally, on March 30, 2006, the City Manager and Paul Jablonski, MTS
Chief Executive Officer, met to discuss this procurement and other transit related
items.
New Negotiated Procurement -
The cooperation between the City and MTS continues with this joint
procurement. Only the procurement process will be consolidated under the MTS
procedure. The administration, management, and contractual responsibilities will
remain with the City, the City Council (as the CVT Board) and its Transit Division
staff.
The MTS procurement had the following objectives:
· Reduce Costs
· Achieve Economies of Scale
· Reduce Contractor Overhead
· Consolidate Services Under One Contractor
· Long-Term Contract - Five-Year Base, Three-Year Option
· Fixed Purchased Transportation Cost Over Eight Years
· Potential savings converted to more transit services
Three firms submitted proposals and price bids. These proposals were
evaluated and ranked by a committee composed of MTS staff and the City's
Transit Coordinator. The procurement process started on March 24, 2006, with
the issuance of the RFP, and ended on July 13, 2006 with the award of the
6-2
01/24/2007, Item (p
Page 3 of 4
contract to Veolia Transportation (formerly ATC) by the MTS Board. The
following table summarizes the rankings and bid prices:
Firm
Ranking Score Original Price Bid Negotiated Avg. Cost
Price er Mile
Veolia
Trans ortation
. FirstTransit Services
. Laidlaw Transit
Services
* $4.36 represents the five-year average of $4.48 less $0.12 amortization of 26 leased
buses
99.9 $362.265.634 $344.512.155 $4.36*
City Transit staff had estimated the following costs if the City had to procure
transit services'
Low Hiah AVQ.
Ava. Est. Cost per Mile $4.73 $4.82 $4.77
Neaotiated Procurement $4.36 $4.36 $4.36
Difference $0.37 $0.46 $0.41
The negotiated price represents an anticipated average savings of $2.72 million.
These numbers were recalculated compared to the numbers on the MTS agenda
to reflect the five-year base contract term and the exclusion of Commuter
Express capital costs included in the bid price.
Additionally, prospective contractors have to abide by the MTS Responsible
Wage Policy No. 31, Section 31.10. or enter into a collective bargaining
agreement.
City Transit staff considers the participation in this regional procurement as part
of the City's practice to work cooperatively with MTS and the continued
strengthening of the transit ties between MTS and the City for the benefit of its
residents.
DECISION MAKER CONFLICT
Not Applicable
Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined
that it is not site specific and consequently the 500 foot rule found in California
Code of Regulations section 18704.2(a)(1) is not applicable to this decision.
6-3
02/06/2007, Item (n
Page 4 of 4
FISCAL IMPACT
CVT operations and capital programming contains no General Fund contribution.
The CVT's operating and capital programming costs are funded by MTS
Consolidated TDA Article 4.0 funds and Federal Transit Administration 5307
funds. All City Staff costs are reimbursed by the MTS funds.
ATTACHMENTS
Memorandum of Understanding between City and MTS
MTS Board Agenda Item No. 32
MTS Responsible Wage Policy No. 31, Section 31.10.
Prepared by: Andy Trujillo - Transit Coordinator, Department of Public Works Operations
6-4
RESOLUTION NO. 2007-
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND THE METROPOLITAN
TRANSIT SYSTEM (MTS) AND AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, the last request for technical proposal (RFTP) and price bid for operations
ofCVT and maintenance of the CVT fleet was issued in December of2001; and
WHEREAS, as a result of the RFTP process, American Transit Corporation (ATe) was
selected as the CVT contract operator for a five-year term. The City's current agreement with
A TC terminates on June 30, 2007; and
WHEREAS, City Transit staff worked with MTS staff and followed the MTS two-step
low bid process and Scope of Work. MTS combined three of their current transit contracts with
a goal of achieving improved economies of scale and reducing transit costs in the region; and
WHEREAS, only the procurement process will be consolidated under the MTS
procedure. The administration, management, and contractual responsibilities will remain with
the City, the City Council (as the (CVT Board) and its Transit Division staff; and
WHEREAS three firms submitted proposals and price bids. These proposals were
evaluated and ranked by a committee composed of MTS staff and the City's Transit Coordinator;
and
WHEREAS, prospective contractors have to abide by the MTS Responsible Wage Policy
No. 31, Section 31.10 or enter into a collective bargaining agreement; and
WHEREAS, the contract was awarded to Veolia Transportation (formerly ATC) by the
MTS Board.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Chula Vista
does hereby approve an Agreement between City of Chula Vista and the Metropolitan Transit
System (MTS) copies of which shall be kept on file in the office of the City Clerk.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of Chula Vista is hereby
authorized to execute the agreement on behalf of the City.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
~wn[\\-\\~\~~,J1
Ann Moore
City Attorney
Dave Byers
Director of Public Works Operations
J:Attorney/ResoslAgreements/Agreement with MTS 2 20 07
6-5
THE ATTACHED AGREEMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED
AND APPROVED AS TO FORM BY THE CITY
ATTORNEY'S OFFICE AND WILL BE
FORMALL Y SIGNED UPON APPROVAL BY
THE CITY COUNCIL
~'\" fC~\"\.~""\~
Ann Moore
City Attorney
Dated: f-E'\o r\AQ(~ \1- 'L-OGI
Memorandum of Unde standing between
The City of Chula Vista and the
Metropolitan Transit System regarding
Provision of Public Transportation Services
6-6
MTS Doc. No. B0473.0-07
OPS 910
MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING
BETWEEN
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
AND THE METROPOLITAN TRANSIT SYSTEM
REGARDING PROVISION OF PUBLIC TRANSPORTATION SERVICES
This agreement (Agreement), dated , 2007, for the purposes of
reference only and effective as of the date last executed, is between the City of Chula Vista (City), a
municipal chartered corporation of the State of California, whose business address, telephone, and
facsimile numbers are as follows:
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
(619) 691-5037 - Telephone
(619) 409-5823 - Facsimile
and the Metropolitan Transit System (MTS), a California publiC agency whose business address,
telephone, and facsimile numbers are as follows:
1255 Imperial Avenue, Suite 1000
San Diego, CA 92101
(619) 231-1466 - Telephone
(619) 234-3172 - Facsimile
The Agreement is made with reference to the following facts:
WHEREAS, the state legislature declared its intent to Improve existing public transportation
services and encourage regional public transportation coordination; and
WHEREAS, MTS is the public agency responsible for the coordination and provision of public
transit services within the County of San Diego; and
WHEREAS, City's public transit operator Chula Vista Transit (CVT) is an independent municipal
transit system with the City Council as its governing board, which operates public transit services within
the City; and
WHEREAS, funding for CVT is allocated and approved each year by the MTS Board of
Directors through the MTS annual budget; and
WHEREAS, CVT has a contract with Veolia to operate bus service within the City. In April of
2006, MTS completed a Comprehensive Operational Analysis (COA) that analyzed all public
transportation services provided by MTS and Its operators and concluded that enhanced bus services
could be provided in the City by combining the services that were provided in the CVT and Veolia's
contract Into a new contract to be bid by MTS; and
WHEREAS, in May of 2006, MTS issued a Request for Proposals (RFP) for contracted bus
services throughout the County of San Diego, including within the City, and awarded a contract to a
private operator to provide bus service. The contract between MTS and the private operator Is 5
%-year base contract with three 1-year options with a start day of January 1, 2007; and
6-7
-1-
WHEREAS. the parties to this Agreement have determined that it would be in their best
interests to enter into an agreement that sets forth how the contract for bus service will be managed
and maintained; and
WHEREAS. the benefits to be gained by the riders who use the transit services provided by
parties to this Agreement will include more economical. efficient. effective, continuous, cooperative.
comprehensive coordination of local. inte~urisdictional, and regional public transportation service in the
San Diego South Bay community; and
NOW, THEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED that the City and MTS do hereby mutually agree as
follows:
For purposes of this Agreement. the following definitions apply:
A. "Chula Vista Transit (CVT)" means the management and administrative staff for the bus
service operated by MTS's contractor in the City.
B. "Contractor" means the private operator of transit services pursuant to the MTS-awarded
contract.
C. "Contract" means the transit services contract between MTS and the Contractor.
1. MTS DUTIES
1.1 Scope of Work and Schedule. MTS has retained Contractor to perform all of the
services and abide by all terms and conditions described in the Contract (Exhibit A),
according to. and within the time frames set forth in the Contract, and deliver to City
such deliverables as are identified in the Contract. within the time frames set forth in the
Contract (time being of the essence) of this Agreement.
1.2 Scope of Work. The MTS Board of Directors. with input from the City, shall determine
the types and levels of service provided by Contractor in the City, consistent with MTS
policies and service planning. regarding the provision of public transportation services.
City and MTS shall work together to maximize the types and levels of services provided
in the City.
1.3 City may request that additional public transportation services be provided within the
City. MTS shall endeavor to provide such additional service if requested by City to the
extent that funds are available to provide such service. and to the extent that the
additional service does not increase operating costs. running times. or create operational
inefficiencies that cannot be paid for by available funds.
1.4 Compensation. MTS is the public agency authorized to receive local transportation
funds from the state. MTS agrees to pay for services rendered by Contractor.
Additionally. MTS agrees to fund the services. materials. and supplies, and City
personnel associated with the operation and maintenance of CVT as allocated in the
annual MTS budget. Funds for CVT staff and administration that are incurred beyond
the approved annual MTS budget will not be reimbursed.
-2-
6-8
B0473.0-07
1.5 Standard of Care. Contractor is obligated to perform the services identified in the
Contract in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by
members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions and in similar
locations.
1.6 Insurance. The Contract requires the Contractor to maintain sufficient insurance for the
levels and types of service being provided and to name the City as an additional insured.
2. DUTIES OF THE CITY
2.1 Consultation and Cooperation. City shall regularly consult with MTS for the purpose of
reviewing the performance of the Contractor and to provide direction and guidance to
achieve the objectives of this Agreement. The City shall permit access to its office and
maintenance facilities, fiies, and records by MTS throughout the term of the Agreement.
2.2 Compensation. The bus services provided by MTS shall be financed by MTS with
funding sources approved in the annual MTS budget. City shall have no obligation to
pay for any of the transit services provided by MTS within the City.
2.3 Facilities. City shall provide office space for CVT staff and shall continue to provide
operation and maintenance facilities for the provision of public transit service at an
amount not less than is currently provided so as to maintain the status quo with respect
to the size and number of facilities.
2.4 Budqet. City shail submit a proposed budget each year, including any capital requests,
which shall be reviewed and approved or modified by the MTS Board of Directors.
2.5 Scope. Contractor shall provide to City all services agreed to in the Contract, and City
shall not request that Contractor perform work outside of the scope of the Contract
unless such work is approved in writing by MTS.
3. ADMINISTRATION OF CONTRACT
3.1 City and MTS mutually agree that the City's transit coordinator will provide
administration, Contract compliance, and monitor service quality for those public transit
services operated by Contractor within the City.
3.2 City shall manage and administer the bus service provided by Contractor and shall
continue to cooperate with MTS in administrative, management, and financial
procedures pertaining the bus service provided by Contractor. Additionally, City shall
have the right to make improvements or changes to the transit facilities located within
the City's Public Works Center, in consultation with MTS, to the extent that the City is
funding any of those improvements or changes. MTS shall have the right to make
improvements or changes to the transit facilities located within the Public Works Center,
in consultation with City, to the extent MTS is funding any of the improvements or
changes.
4. TERM
This Agreement shall remain in effect during such time as MTS is providing public transportation
services in the City unless mutually agreed upon by both parties.
-3-
6-9
B0473.0-07
5. FINANCIAL INTERESTS OF MTS
5.1 MTS is Not Desiqnated as an Fair Political Practices Commission Filer. Nevertheless,
MTS agrees it shall not make, participate in making, or in any way attempt to use MTS's
position to influence a governmental decision in which MTS knows or has reason to
know MTS has a financial interest other than the compensation promised by this
Agreement.
6. HOLD HARMLESS
MTS has inserted the following indemnification clause into its Agreement with Contractor that
provides for Contractor to indemnify City:
Except as may be provided otherwise in the Agreement, Contractor shall
indemnify, defend, and hold harmless MTS, San Diego Transit Corporation
(SDTC), San Diego Trolley, Inc. (SDTI), San Diego and San Diego and Arizona
Eastern (SD&AE) Railway Company, San Diego and Imperial Valley (SD&IV)
Railroad, the County of San Diego (County), and Cities of San Diego, Chula
Vista, Coronado, National City, Imperial Beach, Poway, EI Cajon, La Mesa,
Santee and Lemon Grove, (Cities), their officers, agents, and employees from
any and all claims, demands, loss, litigation, or liability of any kind or nature,
whether real or alleged, which MTS, SDTC, SDTI, SD&AE, SD&IV, County,
and Cities, their officers, agents and employees may sustain or incur, or which
may be imposed upon them, or any of them, for any acts or omissions by
Contractor its officers, agents, or employees, arising out of or in any way
connected with the performance of work under this Agreement. Contractor
shall have no obligation to defend or indemnify MTS, SDTC, SDTI, SD&AE,
SD&IV, County, and Cities for such injury or harm that may be caused solely or
exclusively by the negligence or willful misconduct of MTS, SDTC, SDTI,
SD&AE, SD&IV, County, and Cities, or their agents or employees. In addition
to any other remedy authorized by law, so much of the money due to
Contractor under this Agreement, as shall be considered necessary by MTS,
may be retained until disposition has been made of any claim for damages.
7. TERMINATION OF AGREEMENT
Either City or MTS may terminate this Agreement at any time and for any reason by giving
specific written notice of such termination and specifying the effective date, at least 60 days'
notice before the effective date of such termination. MTS and City each expressly waives any
and all claims for damages or compensation arising under this Agreement except as set forth in
this Agreement. In the event that funding for the public transportation services is eliminated or
decreased, MTS reserves the right to terminate this Agreement immediately or modify it
accordingly without providing 60 days' written notice. MTS and City expressly waive any and all
claims against one another for damages arising from the termination, suspension, or reduction
of the funds which pay for the contract.
8. INDEPENDENT CONTRACTOR
MTS and any of MTS's agents, employees, or representatives, or the Contractor, are, for all
purposes under this Agreement, independent contractors and shall not be deemed to be
employees of City, and none of them shall be entitled to any benefits to which City employees
are entitled, including, but not limited to, overtime, retirement benefits, workers' compensation
-4-
6-10
B0473.0-07
benefits, injury leave, or other leave benefits. Therefore, City will not withhold state or federal
income tax, Social Security tax, or any other payroll tax, and MTS shall be solely responsible for
the payment of same and shall hold the City harmless with regard to such benefits.
9. ATTORNEYS' FEES
Should a dispute arising out of this Agreement result in litigation, it is agreed that the prevailing
party shall be entitled to a judgment against the other for an amount equal to reasonable
attorneys' fees and court costs incurred. The "prevailing party" shall be deemed to be the party
who is awarded substantially the relief sought.
10. STATEMENT OF COSTS
In the event that MTS prepares a report or document or participates in the preparation of a
report or document in performing the services provided by this Agreement, MTS shall include, or
cause the inclusion of, a statement of the numbers and cost in dollar amounts of all contracts
and subcontracts relating to the preparation of the report or document.
11. MISCELLANEOUS
11.1 Neither Party Authorized to Represent the Other. Unless specifically authorized under
this Agreement, MTS shall have no authority to act as City's agent to bind City to any
contractual agreements whatsoever (See Duties of the City, Consultation and
Cooperation, Section 2.1, first sentence). Unless specifically authorized under this
Agreement, City shall have no authority to act as MTS's agent to bind MTS to any
contractual agreements whatsoever.
11.2 Notices. All notices, demands, or requests provided for or permitted to be given
pursuant to this Agreement must be in writing. All notices, demands, and requests to be
sent to any party shall be deemed to have been properly given or served if personally
served or deposited in the United States mail, addressed to such party, postage prepaid,
registered, or certified, with return receipt requested, at the addresses identified in page
one of this Agreement as the places of business for each of the designated parties.
11.3 Entire Aqreement. This Agreement, together with any other written document referred to
or contemplated in this Agreement, embodies the entire Agreement and understanding
between the parties relating to the subject matter of the Agreement. Neither this
Agreement nor any provision of it may be amended, modified, waived, or discharged
except by an instrument in writing executed by the party against which enforcement of
such amendment, waiver, or discharge is sought.
11.4 Capacity of Parties. Each signatory and party to the Agreement warrants and
represents to the other party that it has legal authority, capacity, and direction from its
principal to enter into this Agreement, and that all resolutions or other actions have been
taken so as to enable it to enter into this Agreement.
11.5 Governinq LawNenue. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in
accordance with the laws of the State of California. Any action arising under or relating
to this Agreement shall be brought only in the federal or state courts located in
San Diego County, State of California. Venue for this Agreement and performance
hereunder shall be the County of San Diego.
-5-
6-11
80473.0-07
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Consultant have executed this Agreement thereby indicating
that they have read and understood the same and indicate their full and complete consent to its terms:
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
METROPOLITAN TRANSIT SYSTEM
Cheryl Cox
Mayor
P~
Chief Executive Officer
,
./
Date:
Date: )./3)'?
APPROVED AS TO FORM
APPROVED AS TO FORM
1/[
I .
Ann Moore
City Attorney
Date:
Date:
ATTEST
Susan Bigelow
City Clerk
Date:
-6-
6-12
B0473.0-07
Metropolitan Transit System
1255 Imperial Avenue, Suite 1000
San Diego, CA 92101-7490
619.231.1466, FAX: 619.234.3407
Agenda
Item No. 32
Joint Meeting of the Board of Directors for
Metropolitan Transit System,
San Diego Transit Corporation, and
San Diego Trolley, Inc.
OPS 910
January 18, 2007
SUBJECT:
MTS: MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN MTS AND THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA REGARDING CONSOLIDATION OF BUS OPERATIONS
RECOMMENDATION:
That the Board of Directors receive a report and authorize the Chief Executive Officer
(CEO) to execute a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between the City of
Chula Vista (City) and MTS Regarding Provision of Public Transportation Services in
substantially the same format as attached (Attachment A),
Budaet ImDact
Estimated FY 2007 savings of approximately $1,78 million based upon the City's
calculation as follows:
HIGH I LOW AVERAGE
Estimated Cost oer Mile $4.75 I $4.65 $4.70
Neootiated Procurement $4.54
Difference $0.16
DISCUSSION:
Chula Vista Transit (CVT) operates 35 MTS buses on 8 bus routes in the City of
Chula Vista (Chula Vista). Chula Vista has a contract with Veolia Transportation
Services (VeoHa) to provide transit services within its area of jurisdiction.
Metropolitan Transit System (MTSI is a California public agency and is comprised of San Diego Transit Corporation and San Diego Trolley, Inc. nonprofit public benefit corporations,
in cooperation with Chula Vista Transit and National City Transit. MTS is the taxicab administrator for eight cities and the owner at the San Diego and Mzona Eastern Railway Company.
MTS member agencies include: City of Chula Vista, City of Coronado, City of E! Cajon, City of Imperial Beach, City of La Mesa, City of Lemon Grove, City of National City, City of Poway,
City of San Diego, City of Santee, and the County of San Diego.
6-13
In April of 2006, MTS completed the COA, which analyzed all public transportation
services provided by MTS and its various operators, and concluded that enhanced bus
services could be provided in Chula Vista by combining services operated by Veolia for
CVT into a new contract to be bid by MTS.
In May of 2006, MTS issued a Request for Proposals for contracted bus services
throughout the County of San Diego, included services within Chula Vista, and awarded
a contract to Veolia. The new contract between MTS and Veolia is 5%-year base
contract with three 1-year options. The contract start date was January 1, 2007.
Following the contract award, staff began discussions with CVT staff regarding
consolidating the operation of services within Chula Vista under the new MTSNeolia
contract. An MOU was prepared and negotiated between the parties; a copy of that
MOU is attached hereto and recommended for Board approval.
Paul C. Jablonski
Chief Executive Officer
Key Staff Contact: Tiffany. Lorenzen, 619.557.4512, tiffanv.lorenzen@.sdtms.com
JAN18-07.32.CHULA VISTABUS. TLOREN
Attachment: A. MOU between the City of Chula Vista and MTS
&2'14
I .
ATTACHMENT 9
RESPONSIBLE ORNER WAGE AND BENEFIT REQUIREMENTS
MTS CONTRACT SERVICES. FIXED-ROUTE CONTRACT
CONTRACT BUS DRIVER MINIMUM WAGE and BENEFIT L!:VELS
March 24, 2006
All in dollars per hour
CATEGORY
Training Wage
Percentage change In Bus driver rate 3.0% 3.4% 3.3% 3.2% 3.1% 3.9% 3.3% 3,6%
Pr~ation Wage After Certified $10.55 $10.85 $11.20 $11.55 $11.95 $12.35 $12.80 $13.20 $13.70
Percentage change In Bus driver rate 2.8% 3.2% 3.1% 3.5% 3.3% 3.6% 3.1% 3.8%
After Probationary Period $10.85 $11.20 $11.55 $11.95 $12.35 $12.75 $13.20 $13.65 $14.10
Percentage change In Bus driver rate
Percentage change In rate
4.4%
4.3%
4.1%
4.9%
4.7%
4.9%
4.3%
4.1%
~otes: 1. The full description of MTS responsible wage polley Is Included In MTS Polley No. 31 Section 31.10
2. The training wage shall apply for only the first 160' hours of training. Beyond 160 hours the .probatlon wage after certified" must apply.
3. The proballon wage efter certiflcallon shall apply for a period not to exceed 90 davs after completion of training.
4. Contractor shall offer to full-time and part-time drivers (20 hours or more per week) a family health plan based on a minimum employer
contribution as defined above under health benefits. In the event the employee declines to accept a health plan, contractor shall contribute
to employee the health benefit allowanca shown above in the form of a retirement benefit (e.g., a 401 K contribution) or as a cash payment.
The employee payment would be calculated based on the hourly rate above for Health Benefits times the hours worked In a month or pay period.
5. The requirements of the responsible wage and benefit levels are not applicable to those with a collective bargaining agreement.
Contractor must Indicate that a collecllve bargaining agreement has been executed that covers time beyor1d July 1, 2007.
~cs BID 2008 ATTACHMENT 9 RESPONSIBlEWAGES.3.21.D6
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA STATEMENT
.\v/
.:s - ~ CITY OF
-"...-- CHULA VISTA
ITEM TITLE:
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
FEBRUARY 20, 2007, Item--,:,
RESOLUTION APPROPRIATING $151,000
FROM THE AVAILABLE BALANCE OF THE
GENERAL FUND AND ESTABLISHING NEW CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. DR174 (DRAINAGE
FACILITIES ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY AND
PERMITS); AWARDING THE CONTRACT TO
WHITNEY ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING, INC.
(DBA FOOTHILL ASSOCIATES) TO PERFORM THE
ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES RELATED TO
OBT AINING PERMITS FOR THE MAINTENANCE
ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATED WITH SEVERAL OF THE
CITY'S DRAINAGE FACILITIES; AND AUTHORIZING
THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT
DIRECTOR OF PUBLIC WO~OPERATION~
INTERIM CITY MANAGER t I
4/5THS VOTE: YES ~ NO D
BACKGROUND
Several drainage facilities in the City are in need of maintenance. These activities require
authorizations from various state and federal agencies. The item before the City Council
is a request to create a new capital improvement project to fund the processing of the
state and federal authorizations and preparation of the supporting environmental studies
and to approve the proposed contract with Foothill Associates for an amount not to
exceed $151,000 to provide environmental services related to obtaining the necessary
authorizations.
Various detention basins and an open channel will be the focus of the maintenance
activities. These facilities have been identified by Public Works Operations as the most
critically impacted storm drainage facilities within the City. Currently the City is
precluded from equipment-assisted activities until the required environmental permits
and mitigations are first in place. Until such time as the required authorization are
approved these facilities will continue to gather sediment and excessive native and
7-1
FEBRUARY 20, 2007, Iteml
Page 2 of 4
invasive vegetative growth leading to an increase in flooding potential with the passage
of each storm event if these maintenance activities are not initiated as soon as possible.
As a part of the environmental documentation, the consultant will be conducting plant
and wildlife surveys in accordance with state and federal protocols. In order to survey
during the appropriate seasons the consultant must begin the field surveys in early March,
or risk missing this survey period resulting in a possible delay of one year for obtaining
the required authorizations for the maintenance activities.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed activity for
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined
that the activity, which is adoption of the resolution establishing the Capital Improvement
Project and approving a consultant contract only, is not a "Project" as defined under
Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060( c )(3)
of the State CEQA Guidelines the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no
environmental review is necessary.
RECOMMENDATION
That the City Council adopt the Resolution appropriating $151,000 from the available
balance of the general fund; establish a new Capital Improvement Project (Drainage
Facilities Environmental Study and Permits); approve a two-party agreement between the
City of Chula Vista and Foothill Associates for consulting services related to obtaining
state and federal authorize for the maintenance of various drainage facilities in the City;
and, authorizing the Mayor to execute said agreement.
BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
Not Applicable
DISCUSSION
Today, maintenance of the City's storm drain systems serves two key functions - (I)
flood control to prevent loss of life or property damage and (2) water quality
management. These functions are interrelated, but the attainment of both flood control
and water quality management functions can be difficult in lined and unlined open
channels, as well as detention basins, due to environmental constraints and sometimes
conflicting environmental regulations.
The removal of trash, debris, invasive plants, and sediment, as required under the City's
NPDES Municipal Stormwater Discharge Permit, supports water quality and ensures
proper flood control functioning within open channels and basins. Although the Regional
Water Quality Control Board has allowed municipalities to remove trash, debris, and
dead vegetation by hand from these flood control facilities without an environmental
permit, the City is precluded from equipment-assisted activities or removing native
wetland and riparian plant materials and sediment unless the proper, and costly,
environmental permits and mitigations (i.e., streambed mitigation, wetland and riparian
7-2
FEBRUARY 20,2007, ItemL
Page 3 of 4
habitat mitigation, etc.) are first in place. In addition, if threatened or endangered species
are present, channel and detention basin cleaning, and maintenance activities in most
cases must take place during a narrow time window - September through February, five
months of which are within the official rainy season.
As a result, the eight detention basins and one major flood control channel segment to be
surveyed by the environmental consultant have continued to gather sediment and
excessive native and invasive vegetative growth over the past several years, thereby
leading to an increase in flooding potential with the passage of each storm event.
Fortunately, the region has not experienced severe weather conditions for several years.
This includes the 2004-05 rainy season in which the San Diego region received the third
highest rainfall total on record, but flooding did not occur because rainfall was not
intense and occurred over extended periods of time.
The detention basins and open channel to be surveyed have been identified by Public
Works Operations as the most critically impacted storm drainage facilities within the
City; staff is in the process of identifying and prioritizing additional facilities for future
environmental assessment and permitting. It is imperative that the environmental
assessment process for these facilities occur now because the biological survey season
starts in March - failure to perform these surveys now will result in a minimum one-year
delay in obtaining environmental permits and commencing full flood control maintenance
activities.
Staff had originally planned to recommend a project for this work in the 2006-07 Capital
Improvement Program (CIP) budget. However, because staff could not accurately
predict consultant service costs without soliciting proposals and because General Funds
are needed to perform the work, staff decided to seek a mid-year budget appropriation to
avoid unnecessarily tying-up excess General Funds or having to seek additional funding
mid-year. As Council may recall, when the Department of Public Works Operations'
presented its Strategic Plan to the City Council on June 13,2006, the City Council was
informed of this effort and that staff would request funding for it at a future time.
Consultant Services Selection Process
A Request for Qualifications (RFQ) for these services was circulated to all consulting
firms with the necessary expertise listed on the City's list of Qualified Environmental
Consultants. A total of 11 firms submitted proposals. A Selection Committee was
established pursuant to Section 2.56.110 of the Municipal Code to review the proposals
and conduct interviews of the most qualified firms based on established evaluation
criteria. The Selection Committee reviewed and ranked the proposals based on company
experience, quality of management team, capacity to perform the work, project
understanding, proposal quality and clarity, local experience, and competitive billing
rates. Three firms were selected to be interviewed by the Selection Committee; however
one firm dropped out prior to the interview. Therefore, the Selection Committee
interviewed two firms and recommended Foothill Associates to perform the required
servIces.
7-3
FEBRUARY 20, 2007, Item~
Page 4 of 4
Foothill Associates is uniquely qualified to serve as the Environmental Consultant for this
contract based on their familiarity with the protocols for surveying and the processing for
obtaining the state and federal authorizations for the maintenance work. Foothill
Associates represents that they are experienced and staffed in a manner such that they can
prepare and deliver the required services to the City of Chula Vista.
Scope of Work
Foothill Associates will perform the required services at the direction of City staff under
a two-party agreement. The responsibilities of the Environmental Consultant will include
the following:
. Conducting focused plant and animal species surveys;
. Preparing an appropriate environmental document in accordance with the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA);
. Preparing related technical documents (biological resources reports, survey
reports, wetland delineation reports, and mitigation planning documents);
. Obtaining permits from the various regulatory agencies;
. Preparing a mitigation monitoring and reporting program; and,
. Preparing a wetlands mitigation and monitoring plan
Contract Pavment
The total cost of the contract for consulting services is $151,000, including a 20%
contingency ($30,000) for additional services to cover unforeseen issues that may arise
during the process of obtaining state and federal authorization for the maintenance work
and if determined to be necessary by the Director of Public Works Operations.
The City Attorney's Office has reviewed and approved the form of the contract.
DECISION MAKER CONFLICT
Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council and has found no property
holdings within 500 feet of the boundaries of the properties which are the subject of this
action.
FISCAL IMP ACT
The impact to the General Fund is $151,000. As of the First Quarter Fiscal Status Report
the General Fund reserves were projected at $14.3 million for the year ending June 2007.
Approval of this resolution would reduce the projected General Fund reserve level to
$14.2 million or 8.3%.
ATTACHMENTS:
I. Two-Party Agreement between the City ofChula Vista and Foothill Associates
2. Location Map of Drainage Facilities
Prepared by: Marilyn Ponseggi Environmental Special Projects Manager. Public Works
7-4
RESOLUTION NO.
RESOLUTION APPROPRlATING $151,000 FROM THE A V AILABLE
BALANCE OF THE GENERAL FUND AND ESTABLISHING NEW
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT NO. DRI74 (DRAINAGE FACILITIES
ENVIRONMENTAL STUDY AND PERMITS); AWARDING THE CONTRACT
TO WHITNEY ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING, INC. (DBA FOOTHILL
ASSOCIATES) TO PERFORM THE ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES
RELATED TO OBTAINING PERMITS FOR THE MAINTENANCE
ACTIVITIES ASSOCIATED WITH SEVERAL OF THE CITY'S DRAINAGE
FACILITIES; AND AUTHORlZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE THE
AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, several drainage facilities in the City are in need of maintenance; and
WHEREAS, the maintenance activities require authorizations from various state and
federal agencies; and,
WHEREAS, a new capital improvement project must be established in order to fund the
processing of the state and federal authorizations and preparation of the supporting
environmental studies for the state and federal authorization; and,
WHEREAS, Sufficient funds are available in the available balance of the General Fund to
fund this new capital improvement proj ect and for this appropriation;
WHEREAS, staff does not have the expertise to prepare the environmental technical
studies and documents necessary for the processing of the state and federal authorization; and,
WHEREAS, the City solicited and received eleven proposals in June 2006 to perform
environmental services related to the maintenance of eight detention facilities and a segment of
one storm drainage channel located within the City; and
WHEREAS, a Selection Committee was established pursuant to Section 2.56.110 of the
Municipal Code to review the qualifications of each firm based on established evaluation criteria;
and
WHEREAS, the City evaluated each proposal based on clarity, approach, cost,
qualifications, and completeness; and
WHEREAS, the Selection Committee interviewed the top two firms and recommended
Foothill Associates to perform the required services for the City; and
WHEREAS, Foothill Associates was selected based upon their proposed approach and
demonstrated qualifications to perform the services outlined in the detailed scope of work; and
7-5
WHEREAS, Foothill warrants and represents that they are experienced and staffed in a
manner such that they can prepare and deliver the services required of Consultant to City within
the time frames specified in the Agreement in accordance with the terms and conditions of the
Agreement;
WHEREAS, the proposed contract with Foothill Associates to provide consultant
services in an amount not to exceed $120,600 with an additional $30,000 for additional services
if deemed necessary at the discretion of the Director of Public Works Operations;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City of the City of Chula Vista does
hereby appropriate $151,000 from the available balance of the General Fund and establish a new
Capital Improvement Project No. DRI74 (Drainage Facilities Environmental Study and Permits);
and,
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista
does hereby award the contract to Foothill Associates to perform the environmental
servIces
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of Chula Vista is hereby
authorized and directed to execute said Agreement for and on behalf of the City of Chula Vista.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
David C. Byers
Director of Public Works Operations
~\llKS\ \'1C\'~fu\\
Ann Moore
City Attorney
7-6
THE ATTACHED AGREEMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED
AND APPROVED AS TO FORM BY THE CITY
ATTORNEY'S OFFICE AND WILL BE
FORMALL Y SIGNED UPON APPROVAL BY
THE CITY COUNCIL
~~~~\\
Ann Moore
City Attorney
Dated: YO"",<\)~~ \ -+ ) 1..001
Agreement between the C ty ofChula Vista
And Whitney Environmental Consulting, Inc. (dba Foothill Associates)
7-7
Parties and Recital Page(s)
Agreement between
City ofChula Vista
and
Whitney Environmental Consulting, Inc. (dba Foothill Associates)
for environmental services related to tasks that consist of conducting focused plant
and animal species surveys, preparing an appropriate environmental document in
accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and related
technical documents, obtaining permits from the various regulatory agencies, preparing
a mitigation monitoring and reporting program and preparing a wetlands mitigation
and monitoring plan for a maintenance project that involves eight stormwater
detention facilities and a segment of a storm drainage channel
This agreement ("Agreement"), dated February 20,2007 for the purposes of reference only,
and effective as of the date last executed unless another date is otherwise specified in Exhibit A,
Paragraph I, is between the City-related entity as is indicated on Exhibit A, Paragraph 2, as such
("City"), whose business form is set forth on Exhibit A, Paragraph 3, and the entity indicated on
the attached Exhibit A, Paragraph 4, as Foothill, whose business form is set forth on Exhibit A,
Paragraph 5, and whose place of business and telephone numbers are set forth on Exhibit A,
Paragraph 6 ("Consultant"), and is made with reference to the following facts:
Recitals
WHEREAS, the City solicited and received eleven proposals in June 2006 to perform
environmental services related to the maintenance of eight storm water detention facilities and a
segment of one storm drainage channel located within the City; and
WHEREAS, the City evaluated each proposal based on clarity, approach, cost,
qualifications, and completeness; and
WHEREAS, Foothill Associates was selected based upon their proposed approach and
demonstrated qualifications to perform the services outlined in the detailed scope of work; and
WHEREAS, Foothill warrants and represents that they are experienced and staffed in a
manner such that they can prepare and deliver the services required of Foothill to City within the
time frames herein provided all in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement;
Page 1
Agreement with Whitney Environmental Consulting, Inc.
dba Foothill Associates
February, 2007
7-8
Obligatory Provisions Pages
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City and Foothill do hereby mutually
agree as follows:
1. Foothill's Duties
A. General Duties
Foothill shall perform all of the services described on the attached Exhibit A, Paragraph 7,
entitled "General Duties"; and,
B. Scope of Work and Schedule
In the process of performing and delivering said "General Duties", Foothill shall also perform
all of the services described in Exhibit A, Paragraph 8, entitled "Scope of Work and Schedule",
not inconsistent with the General Duties, according to, and within the time frames set forth in
Exhibit A, Paragraph 8, and deliver to City such Deliverables as are identified in Exhibit A,
Paragraph 8, within the time frames set forth, time being of the essence of this Agreement. The
General Duties and the work and deliverables required in the Scope of Work and Schedule shall
be referred to as the "Defined Services". Failure to complete the Defined Services by the times
indicated does not, except at the option of the City, operate to terminate this Agreement.
C. Reductions in Scope of Work
City may independently, or upon request from Foothill, from time to time reduce the Defined
Services to be performed by the Foothill under this Agreement. Upon doing so, City and Foothill
agree to meet in good faith and confer for the purpose of negotiating a corresponding reduction
in the compensation associated with the reduction of services.
D. Additional Services
In addition to performing the Defined Services set forth in this Agreement, City may require
Foothill to perform additional consulting services related to the Defined Services ("Additional
Services"), and upon doing so in writing, if they are within the scope of services offered by
Foothill, Foothill shall perform the additional services on a time and materials basis at the rates
set forth in the "Rate Schedule" in Exhibit A, Paragraph 10(e), unless a separate fixed fee is
otherwise agreed upon. All compensation for Additional Services shall be paid monthly as billed.
E. Standard of Care
Foothill, in performing any Services under this Agreement, whether Defined Services or
Additional Services, shall perform in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill
ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions
and in similar locations.
Page 2
Agreement with Whitney Environmental Consulting, Inc.
dba Foothill Associates
February, 2007
7-9
F. Insurance
Foothill must procure insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property
that may arise from or in connection with the performance of the work under the contract and the
results of that work by Foothill, its agents, representatives, employees or subcontractors and
provide documentation of insurance prior to commencement of work. The insurance must be
maintained for the duration of the Agreement.
Minimum Scope of Insurance
Coverage must be at least as broad as:
(I) Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence Form
CGOOOl).
(2) Insurance Services Office Form Number CA 0001 covering Automobile Liability,
Code I (any auto).
(3) Workers' Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and
Employer's Liability Insurance.
(4) Professional Liability or Errors & Omissions Liability insurance appropriate to the
Foothill's profession. Architects' and Engineers' coverage is to be endorsed to
include contractual liability.
Minimum Limits of Insurance
Foothill must maintain limits no less than:
I. General Liability:
(Including operations,
products and completed
operations, as applicable)
2. Automobile Liability:
3. Workers' Compensation
Employer's Liability:
4. Professional Liability or
Errors & Omissions
$1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and
property damage. If Commercial General Liability insurance
with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general
aggregate limit must apply separately to this project/location or
the general aggregate limit must be twice the required occurrence
limit.
$1,000,000 per accident for bodily injury and property damage.
Statutory
$1,000,000 each accident
$1,000,000 disease-policy limit
$1,000,000 disease-each employee
$1,000,000 each occurrence
Page 3
Agreement with Whitney Environmental Consulting, Inc.
dba Foothill Associates
February, 2007
7-10
Liability:
Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions
Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. At
the option of the City, either the insurer will reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured
retentions as they pertain to the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or Foothill
will provide a financial guarantee satisfactory to the City, guaranteeing payment oflosses and
related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses.
Other Insurance Provisions
The general liability, automobile liability, and where appropriate, the worker's compensation
policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions:
(1) The City of Chula Vista, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers are
to be named as additional insureds with respect to liability arising out of automobiles
owned, leased, hired or borrowed by or on behalf of Foothill, where applicable, and,
with respect to liability arising out of work or operations performed by or on behalf of
Foothill, including providing materials, parts or equipment furnished in connection
with such work or operations. The general liability additional insured coverage must
be provided in the form of an endorsement to the contractor's insurance using ISO
CG 2010 (11/85) or its equivalent. Specifically, the endorsement must not exclude
Products/Completed Operations coverage.
(2) Foothill's General Liability insurance coverage must be primary insurance as it
pertains to the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers. Any
insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees,
or volunteers is wholly separate from the insurance of Foothill and in no way relieves
the Foothill from its responsibility to provide insurance.
(3) The insurance policy required by this clause must be endorsed to state that coverage
will not be canceled by either party, except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice
to the City by certified mail, return receipt requested.
(4) Coverage shall not extend to any indemnity coverage for the active negligence of the
additional insured in any case where an agreement to indemnify the additional insured
would be invalid under Subdivision (b) of Section 2782 of the Civil Code.
(5) Foothill's insurer will provide a Waiver of Subrogation in favor of the City for each
required policy providing coverage during the life of this contract.
If General Liability, Pollution and/or Asbestos Pollution Liability and/or Errors & Omissions
coverage are written on a claims-made form:
Page 4
Agreement with Whitney Environmental Consulting, Inc.
dba Foothill Associates
February, 2007
7-11
(1) The "Retro Date" must be shown, and must be before the date of the Agreement or
the beginning of the Agreement work.
(2) Insurance must be maintained and evidence of insurance must be provided for at least
five (5) years after completion of the contract work.
(3) If coverage is canceled or non-renewed, and not replaced with another claims-made
policy form with a "Retro Date" prior to the contract effective date, Foothill must
purchase "extended reporting" coverage for a minimum of five (5) years after
completion of contract work.
(4) A copy of the claims reporting requirements must be submitted to the City for review.
Acceptability of Insurers
Insurance is to be placed with licensed insurers admitted to transact business in the State of
California with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A V. If insurance is placed with a
surplus lines insurer, insurer must be listed on the State of California List of Eligible Surplus
Lines Insurers ("LESLI") with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A X. Exception may
be made for the State Compensation Fund when not specifically rated.
Verification of Coverage
Foothill shall furnish the City with original certificates and amendatory endorsements
effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements should be on insurance industry
forms, provided those endorsements or policies conform to the contract requirements. All
certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work
commences. The City reserves the right to require, at any time, complete, certified copies of all
required insurance policies, including endorsements evidencing the coverage required by these
specifications.
Subcontractors
Foothill must include all sub consultants as insureds under its policies or furnish separate
certificates and endorsements for each subconsultant. All coverage for subconsultants are subject
to all of the requirements included in these specifications.
G. Security for Performance
(1) Performance Bond
In the event that Exhibit A, at Paragraph 18, indicates the need for Foothill to provide a
Performance Bond (indicated by a check mark in the parenthetical space immediately preceding
the subparagraph entitled "Performance Bond"), then Foothill shall provide to the City a
performance bond in the form prescribed by the City and by such sureties which are authorized
Page 5
Agreement with Whitney Environmental Consulting, Inc.
dba Foothill Associates
February, 2007
7-12
to transact such business in the State of California, listed as approved by the United States
Department of Treasury Circular 570, htto://www.fins.treas.gov/c570, and whose underwriting
limitation is sufficient to issue bonds in the amount required by the agreement, and which also
satisfY the requirements stated in Section 995.660 of the Code of Civil Procedure, except as
provided otherwise by laws or regulations. All bonds signed by an agent must be accompanied
by a certified copy of such agent's authority to act. Surety companies must be duly licensed or
authorized in the jurisdiction in which the Project is located to issue bonds for the limits so
required. Form must be satisfactory to the Risk Manager or City Attorney which amount is
indicated in the space adjacent to the term, "Performance Bond", in said Exhibit A, Paragraph 18.
(2) Letter of Credit
In the event that Exhibit A, at Paragraph 18, indicates the need for Foothill to provide a
Letter of Credit (indicated by a check mark in the parenthetical space immediately preceding the
subparagraph entitled "Letter of Credit"), then Foothill shall provide to the City an irrevocable
letter of credit callable by the City at their unfettered discretion by submitting to the bank a letter,
signed by the City Manager, stating that Foothill is in breach of the terms of this Agreement. The
letter of credit shall be issued by a bank, and be in a form and amount satisfactory to the Risk
Manager or City Attorney which amount is indicated in the space adjacent to the term, "Letter of
Credit", in said Exhibit A, Paragraph 18.
(3) Other Security
In the event that Exhibit A, at Paragraph 18, indicates the need for Foothill to provide
security other than a Performance Bond or a Letter of Credit (indicated by a check mark in the
parenthetical space immediately preceding the subparagraph entitled "Other Security"), then
Foothill shall provide to the City such other security therein listed in a form and amount
satisfactory to the Risk Manager or City Attorney.
H. Business License
Foothill agrees to obtain a business license from the City and to otherwise comply with Title
5 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code.
2. Duties of the City
A. Consultation and Cooperation
City shall regularly consult Foothill for the purpose of reviewing the progress of the Defined
Services and Schedule contained in this Agreement, and to provide direction and guidance to
achieve the objectives of this agreement. The City shall permit access to its office facilities, files
and records by Foothill throughout the term of the agreement. In addition, City agrees to provide
the information, data, items and materials set forth on Exhibit A, Paragraph 9, and with the
further understanding that delay in the provision of these materials beyond thirty (30) days after
Page 6
Agreement with Whitney Environmental Consulting, Inc.
dba Foothill Associates
February, 2007
7-13
authorization to proceed, shall constitute a basis for the justifiable delay in Foothill's
performance of this Agreement.
B. Compensation
Upon receipt of a properly prepared billing from Foothill submitted to the City periodically
as indicated in Exhibit A, Paragraph 17, but in no event more frequently than monthly, on the
day of the period indicated in Exhibit A, Paragraph 17, City shall compensate Foothill for all
services rendered by Foothill according to the terms and conditions set forth in Exhibit A,
Paragraph 10, adjacent to the governing compensation relationship indicated by a "checkrnark"
next to the appropriate arrangement, subj ect to the requirements for retention set forth in
Paragraph 18 of Exhibit A, and shall compensate Foothill for out of pocket expenses as provided
in Exhibit A, Paragraph II.
All billings submitted by Foothill shall contain sufficient information as to the propriety of
the billing to permit the City to evaluate that the amount due and payable thereunder is proper,
and shall specifically contain the City's account number indicated on Exhibit A, Paragraph 17(C)
to be charged upon making such payment.
3. Administration of Contract
Each party designates the individuals ("Contract Administrators") indicated on Exhibit A,
Paragraph 12, as said party's contract administrator who is authorized by said party to represent
them in the routine administration of this agreement.
4. Term
This Agreement shall terminate when the Parties have complied with all executory provisions
hereof.
5. Liquidated Damages
The provisions of this section apply if a Liquidated Damages Rate is provided in Exhibit A,
Paragraph 13.
It is acknowledged by both parties that time is of the essence in the completion of this
Agreement. It is difficult to estimate the amount of damages resulting from delay in
performance. The parties have used their judgment to arrive at a reasonable amount to
compensate for delay.
Failure to complete the Defined Services within the allotted time period specified in this
Agreement shall result in the following penalty: For each consecutive calendar day in excess of
the time specified for the completion of the respective work assignment or Deliverable, Foothill
shall pay to the City, or have withheld from monies due, the sum of Liquidated Damages Rate
provided in Exhibit A, Paragraph 13 ("Liquidated Damages Rate").
Page 7
Agreement with Whitney Environmental Consulting, Inc.
dba Foothill Associates
February, 2007
7-14
Time extensions for delays beyond Foothill's control, other than delays caused by the City,
shall be requested in writing to the City's Contract Administrator, or designee, prior to the
expiration of the specified time. Extensions oftime, when granted, will be based upon the effect
of delays to the work and will not be granted for delays to minor portions of work unless it can
be shown that such delays did or will delay the progress of the work.
6. Financial Interests of Foothill
A. Foothill is Designated as an FPPC Filer
If Foothill is designated on Exhibit A, Paragraph 14, as an "FPPC filer", Foothill is deemed
to be a "Consultant" for the purposes of the Political Reform Act conflict of interest and
disclosure provisions, and shall report economic interests to the City Clerk on the required
Statement of Economic Interests in such reporting categories as are specified in Paragraph 14 of
Exhibit A, or if none are specified, then as determined by the City Attorney.
B. Decline to Participate
Regardless of whether Foothill is designated as an FPPC Filer, Foothill shall not make, or
participate in making or in any way attempt to use Foothill's position to influence a governmental
decision in which Foothill knows or has reason to know Foothill has a financial interest other
than the compensation promised by this Agreement.
C. Search to Determine Economic Interests
Regardless of whether Foothill is designated as an FPPC Filer, Foothill warrants and
represents that Foothill has diligently conducted a search and inventory of Foothill's economic
interests, as the term is used in the regulations promulgated by the Fair Political Practices
Commission, and has determined that Foothill does not, to the best of Foothill's knowledge, have
an economic interest which would conflict with Foothill's duties under this agreement.
D. Promise Not to Acquire Conflicting Interests
Regardless of whether Foothill is designated as an FPPC Filer, Foothill further warrants and
represents that Foothill will not acquire, obtain, or assume an economic interest during the term
of this Agreement which would constitute a conflict of interest as prohibited by the Fair Political
Practices Act.
E. Duty to Advise of Conflicting Interests
Regardless of whether Foothill is designated as an FPPC Filer, Foothill further warrants and
represents that Foothill will immediately advise the City Attorney of City if Foothill learns of an
economic interest of Foothill's that may result in a conflict of interest for the purpose of the Fair
Political Practices Act, and regulations promulgated there under.
Page 8
Agreement with Whitney Environmental Consulting, Inc.
dba Foothill Associates
February, 2007
7-15
F. Specific Warranties Against Economic Interests
Foothill warrants and represents that neither Foothill, nor Foothill employees' immediate
family members, nor Foothill's employees or agents ("Foothill Associates") presently have any
interest, directly or indirectly, whatsoever in any property which may be the subject matter of the
Defined Services, or in any property within 2 radial miles from the exterior boundaries of any
property which may be the subject matter of the Defined Services, ("Prohibited Interest"), other
than as listed in Exhibit A, Paragraph 14.
Foothill further warrants and represents that no promise of future employment, remuneration,
consideration, gratuity or other reward or gain has been made to Foothill or Foothill Associates
in connection with Foothill's performance of this Agreement. Foothill to advise City of any such
promise that may be made during the Term of this Agreement, or for twelve months thereafter.
Foothill agrees that Foothill Associates shall not acquire any such Prohibited Interest within
the Term of this Agreement, or for twelve months after the expiration of this Agreement, except
with the written permission of City.
Foothill may not conduct or solicit any business for any party to this Agreement, or for any
third party that may be in conflict with Foothill's responsibilities under this Agreement, except
with the written permission of City.
7. Hold Harmless
Foothill shall defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, its elected and
appointed officers and employees, from and against all claims for damages, liability, cost and
expense (including without limitation attorneys fees) arising out of or alleged by third parties to
be the result of the negligent acts, errors or omissions or the willful misconduct of Foothill, and
Foothill's employees, subcontractors or other persons, agencies or firms for whom Foothill is
legally responsible in connection with the execution of the work covered by this Agreement,
except only for those claims, damages, liability, costs and expenses (including without
limitations, attorneys fees) arising from the sole negligence or sole willful misconduct of the
City, its officers, employees. Also covered is liability arising from, connected with, caused by or
claimed to be caused by the active or passive negligent acts or omissions of the City, its agents,
officers, or employees which may be in combination with the active or passive negligent acts or
omissions of Foothill, its employees, agents or officers, or any third party.
With respect to losses arising from Foothill's professional errors or omissions, Foothill shall
defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, its elected and appointed officers and
employees, from and against all claims for damages, liability, cost and expense (including
without limitation attorneys fees) except for those claims arising from the negligence or willful
misconduct of City, its officers or employees.
Page 9
Agreement with Whitney Environmental Consulting, Inc.
dba Foothill Associates
February, 2007
7-16
Foothill's indemnification shall include any and all costs, expenses, attorneys fees and
liability incurred by the City, its officers, agents or employees in defending against such claims,
whether the same proceed to judgment or not. Foothill's obligations under this Section shall not
be limited by any prior or subsequent declaration by Foothill. Foothill's obligations under this
Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement.
For those professionals who are required to be licensed by the state (e.g. architects, landscape
architects, surveyors and engineers), the following indemnification provisions should be utilized:
(I) Indemnification and Hold Harmless Agreement
With respect to any liability, including but not limited to claims asserted or costs, losses,
attorney fees, or payments for injury to any person or property caused or claimed to be caused by
the acts or omissions of Foothill, or Foothill's employees, agents, and officers, arising out of any
services performed involving this project, except liability for Professional Services covered
under Section 7.2, Foothill agrees to defend, indemnify, protect, and hold harmless the City, its
agents, officers, or employees from and against all liability. Also covered is liability arising
from, connected with, caused by, or claimed to be caused by the active or passive negligent acts
or omissions of the City, its agents, officers, or employees which may be in combination with the
active or passive negligent acts or omissions of Foothill, its employees, agents or officers, or any
third party. Foothill's duty to indemnify, protect and hold harmless shall not include any claims
or liabilities arising from the sole negligence or sole willful misconduct of the City, its agents,
officers or employees. This section in no way alters affects or modifies Foothill's obligation and
duties under Section Exhibit A to this Agreement.
(2) Indemnification for Professional Services.
As to Foothill's professional obligation, work or services involving this Project, Foothill
agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers and employees from
and against any and all liability, claims, costs, and damages, including but not limited to,
attorneys fees, that arise out of, or pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness or willful
misconduct of Foothill and its agents in the performance of services under this agreement, but
this indemnity does not apply liability for damages for death or bodily injury to persons, injury to
property, or other loss, arising from the sole negligence, willful misconduct or defects in design
by City or the agents, servants, or independent contractors who are directly responsible to City,
or arising from the active negligence of City.
8. Termination of Agreement for Cause
If, through any cause, Foothill shall fail to fulfill in a timely and proper manner Foothill's
obligations under this Agreement, or if Foothill shall violate any of the covenants, agreements or
stipulations of this Agreement, City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving
written notice to Foothill of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof at least
five (5) days before the effective date of such termination. In that event, all finished or
unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, reports and other materials
Page 10
Agreement with Whitney Environmental Consulting, Inc.
dba Foothill Associates
February, 2007
7-17
prepared by Foothill shall, at the option ofthe City, become the property of the City, and Foothill
shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed
on such documents and other materials up to the effective date of Notice of Termination, not to
exceed the amounts payable hereunder, and less any damages caused City by Foothill's breach.
9. Errors and Omissions
In the event that the City Contract Administrator determines that Foothills' negligence,
errors, or omissions in the performance of work under this Agreement has resulted in expense to
City greater than would have resulted ifthere were no such negligence, errors, omissions,
Foothill shall reimburse City for any additional expenses incurred by the City. Nothing in this
Agreement is intended to limit City's rights under other provisions of this agreement.
10. Termination of Agreement for Convenience of City
City may terminate this Agreement at any time and for any reason, by giving specific written
notice to Foothill of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof, at least thirty (30)
days before the effective date of such termination. In that event, all finished and unfinished
documents and other materials described hereinabove shall, at the option of the City, become
City's sole and exclusive property. If the Agreement is terminated by City as provided in this
paragraph, Foothill shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any
satisfactory work completed on such documents and other materials to the effective date of such
termination. Foothill hereby expressly waives any and all claims for damages or compensation
arising under this Agreement except as set forth herein.
II. Assignability
The services of Foothill are personal to the City, and Foothill shall not assign any interest in
this Agreement, and shall not transfer any interest in the same (whether by assignment or
notation), without prior written consent of City.
City hereby consents to the assignment of the portions of the Defined Services identified in
Exhibit A, Paragraph 16 to the subconsultants identified thereat as "Permitted Subconsultants".
12. Ownership, Publication, Reproduction and Use of Material
All reports, studies, information, data, statistics, forms, designs, plans, procedures, systems
and any other materials or properties produced under this Agreement shall be the sole and
exclusive property of City. No such materials or properties produced in whole or in part under
this Agreement shall be subject to private use, copyrights or patent rights by Foothill in the
United States or in any other country without the express written consent of City. City shall have
unrestricted authority to publish, disclose (except as may be limited by the provisions of the
Public Records Act), distribute, and otherwise use, copyright or patent, in whole or in part, any
such reports, studies, data, statistics, forms or other materials or properties produced under this
Agreement.
Page II
Agreement with Whitney Environmental Consulting, Inc.
dba Foothill Associates
February, 2007
7-18
13. Independent Contractor
City is interested only in the results obtained and Foothill shall perform as an independent
contractor with sole control of the manner and means of performing the services required under
this Agreement. City maintains the right only to reject or accept Foothill's work products.
Foothill and any of the Foothill's agents, employees or representatives are, for all purposes under
this Agreement, an independent contractor and shall not be deemed to be an employee of City,
and none of them shall be entitled to any benefits to which City employees are entitled including
but not limited to, overtime, retirement benefits, worker's compensation benefits, injury leave or
other leave benefits. Therefore, City will not withhold state or federal income tax, social security
tax or any other payroll tax, and Foothill shall be solely responsible for the payment of same and
shall hold the City harmless with regard thereto.
14. Administrative Claims Requirements and Procedures
No suit or arbitration shall be brought arising out of this Agreement, against the City unless a
claim has first been presented in writing and filed with the City and acted upon by the City in
accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 1.34 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, as
same may from time to time be amended, the provisions of which are incorporated by this
reference as if fully set forth in this Agreement, and such policies and procedures used by the
City in the implementation of same.
Upon request by City, Foothill shall meet and confer in good faith with City for the purpose
of resolving any dispute over the terms of this Agreement.
15. Attorney's Fees
Should a dispute arising out of this Agreement result in litigation, it is agreed that the
prevailing party shall be entitled to a judgment against the other for an amount equal to
reasonable attorney's fees and court costs incurred. The "prevailing party" shall be deemed to be
the party who is awarded substantially the relief sought.
16. Statement of Costs
In the event that Foothill prepares a report or document, or participates in the preparation of a
report or document in performing the Defined Services, Foothill shall include, or cause the
inclusion of, in said report or document, a statement of the numbers and cost in dollar amounts of
all contracts and subcontracts relating to the preparation of the report or document.
Page 12
Agreement with Whitney Environmental Consulting, Inc.
dba Foothill Associates
February, 2007
7-19
17. Miscellaneous
A. Foothill not authorized to Represent City
Unless specifically authorized in writing by City, Foothill shall have no authority to act as
City's agent to bind City to any contractual agreements whatsoever.
B. Foothill is Real Estate Broker and/or Salesman
If the box on Exhibit A, Paragraph 15 is marked, Foothill and/or their principals is/are
licensed with the State of California or some other state as a licensed real estate broker or
salesperson. Otherwise, Foothill represents that neither Foothill, nor their principals are licensed
real estate brokers or salespersons.
C. Notices
All notices, demands or requests provided for or permitted to be given pursuant to this
Agreement must be in writing. All notices, demands and requests to be sent to any party shall be
deemed to have been properly given or served if personally served or deposited in the United
States mail, addressed to such party, postage prepaid, registered or certified, with return receipt
requested, at the addresses identified herein as the places of business for each of the designated
parties.
D. Entire Agreement
This Agreement, together with any other written document referred to or contemplated
herein, embody the entire Agreement and understanding between the parties relating to the
subject matter hereof. Neither this Agreement nor any provision hereof may be amended,
modified, waived or discharged except by an instrument in writing executed by the party against
which enforcement of such amendment, waiver or discharge is sought.
E. Capacity of Parties
Each signatory and party hereto hereby warrants and represents to the other party that it has
legal authority and capacity and direction from its principal to enter into this Agreement, and that
all resolutions or other actions have been taken so as to enable it to enter into this Agreement.
F. Governing LawlVenue
This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State
of California. Any action arising under or relating to this Agreement shall be brought only in the
federal or state courts located in San Diego County, State of California, and if applicable, the
City of Chula Vista, or as close thereto as possible. Venue for this Agreement, and performance
hereunder, shall be the City of Chula Vista.
(End of page. Next page is signature page.)
Page 13
Agreement with Whitney Environmental Consulting, Inc.
dba Foothill Associates
February, 2007
7-20
Signature Page
to
Agreement between
City of Chula Vista
and
Foothill Associates
for environmental services related to tasks that consist of conducting focused plant
and animal species surveys, preparing an appropriate environmental document in
accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and related
technical documents, obtaining permits from the various regulatory agencies, preparing
a mitigation monitoring and reporting program and preparing a wetlands mitigation
and monitoring plan for a maintenance project that involves eight stormwater
detention facilities and a segment of a storm drainage channel
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Foothill have executed this Agreement thereby
indicating that they have read and understood same, and indicate their full and complete consent
to its terms:
City of Chula Vista
Dated:
By:
Cheryl Cox, Mayor
Attest:
Susan Bigelow, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Ann Moore, City Attorney
Page 14
Agreement with Whitney Environmental Consulting, Inc.
dba Foothill Associates
February, 2007
7-21
Dated:
:>j I '21 01-'"
Exhibit List to Agreement
( ) Exhibit A.
Whitney Environmental Consulting, Inc.
dba Foothill Associates
BY:~~/~
Kathlee . .C. Kirsh, ASLA
Vice-President
By:
Page 15
Agreement with Whitney Environmental Consulting, Inc.
dba Foothill Associates
February, 2007
7-22
Exhibit A
to
Agreement between
City of Chula Vista
and
Foothill Associates
1. Effective Date of Agreement: February 20,2007
2. City-Related Entity:
(x )City ofChula Vista, a municipal chartered corporation of the State of California
( ) Redevelopment Agency of the City ofChula Vista, a political subdivision of the State of
California
( ) Industrial Development Authority of the City ofChula Vista, a
( ) Other:
, a [insert business form]
("City")
3. Place of Business for City:
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
4. Consultant:
Whitney Environmental Consulting, Inc. dba Foothill Associates ("Foothill")
5. Business Form of Foothill:
( ) Sole Proprietorship
( ) Partnership
(X ) Corporation
6. Place of Business, Telephone and Fax Number of Foothill:
10509 Vista Sorrento Parkway, Suite 120
San Diego, California 92121
Voice Phone: (858) 552-8885
Fax Phone: (858) 552-8886
Page 16
Agreement with Whitney Environmental Consulting, Inc.
dba Foothill Associates
February, 2007
7-23
7. General Duties:
Foothill shall provide environmental services related to tasks that consist of conducting
focused plant and animal species surveys, preparing an appropriate environmental
document in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and
related technical documents (biological resources reports, survey reports, wetland
delineation reports, and mitigation planning documents), obtaining permits from the
various regulatory agencies, preparing a mitigation monitoring and reporting program
and preparing a wetlands mitigation and monitoring plan for a maintenance project that
involves eight stormwater detention facilities and a segment of a storm drainage channel
8. Scope of Work and Schedule:
A. Detailed Scope of Work:
Foothill will provide environmental services related to tasks that consist of conducting focused
plant and animal species surveys, preparing an appropriate environmental document in
accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and related technical
documents (biological resources reports, survey reports, wetland delineation reports, and
mitigation planning documents), obtaining permits from the various regulatory agencies,
preparing a mitigation monitoring and reporting program and preparing a wetlands mitigation
and monitoring plan. The maintenance project involves eight stormwater detention facilities and
a segment of a storm drainage channel described as:
1. North of Otay Rio Road and the Coors Amphitheater parking lot, 1.00 acre (Otay River
Tributary)
2. Southeast corner of Sweetwater Road and Willow Road, 1.14 acres (Sweetwater River
Tributary)
3. North Rancho Del Rey, between Terra Nova and Del Rey Boulevard, 1.00 acre (Bonita
Canyon Basin)
4. North of East H Street, between Terra Nova and Del Rey Boulevard, 6.62 acres (Rice
Canyon Basin
5. South of200 Block Rancho Drive, 0.61 acres (Poggi Canyon Basin)
6. Northeast corner of Oleander Avenue and East Palomar Street, 2.24 acres (Palm Basin)
7. Willow Street Bridge area, south side of the bridge, 0.50 acre (Sweetwater River
Tributary)
8. Telegraph Canyon Road, east of Rutgers Avenue, box culvert inlet north side of
Telegraph Canyon Road, outlet south side of Telegraph Canyon Road, 1.60 acres
(Telegraph Canyon Basin)
9. North side of Telegraph Canyon Road beginning from the edge of the concrete lined
channel then easterly to Paseo Ladera (approximately 23,650 square feet)
Detailed Scope of Work:
Foothill shall perform the following tasks:
Task 1 - Kickoff Meetinl!. City staff will arrange and Foothills staff shall attend a kickoff
meeting between the City's project management staff and key members of the Foothill's project
Page 17
Agreement with Whitney Environmental Consulting, Inc.
dba Foothill Associates
February, 2007
7-24
team. The meeting will provide an opportunity for the City and Foothill staff to become
acquainted, exchange relevant project information, and provide clarifications for the scope of
work.
Task 2: - Focused Biolo2ical Surveys.
Task 2.1 Wildlife Survev. Based on information in the Biological Constraints Analysis for the
City ofChula Vista 12 Detention Facilities Maintenance Project, dated June 2006, ("Constraints
Analysis") Foothill's biologist will conduct protocol presence/absence surveys for California
gnatcatcher (Polioptila californica), least Bell's vireo (Vireo bellii pusillus), and southwestern
willow flycatcher (Empidonax traillii extimus) at all facility sites where suitable habitat exists. A
biologist with the necessary permits from the state and federal agencies will conduct surveys
according to the u.s. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) protocol. Foothill will submit a survey
notification to the USFWS 10 days prior to conducting surveys, as required. In addition to
protocol surveys for listed species, the Foothill biologist will conduct presence/absence western
burrowing owl (Speotyto cunicularia) surveys according to the accepted Burrowing Owl
Consortium Survey Protocol at all facility sites where suitable habitat exists. All detected
locations will be mapped and occurrence information recorded. Foothill will document the
results of each survey in technical letter reports, which will be submitted to the City for review.
These technical letter reports will serve as the required 45-day reports to be submitted to the
USFWS following the completion of the surveys. The surveys will occur during the
corresponding nesting seasons in 2007.
Task 2.2 Plant Survevs & Habitat Mappin2. Based on information in the "Constraints
Analysis", Foothill's biologists will conduct focused surveys for specific sensitive plant species
at all facility sites where suitable habitat exists. Plant species to be surveyed include San Diego
thommint (Acanthomintha ilicifolia) San Diego bur-sage (Ambrosia chenopodifolia), San Diego
ambrosia (Ambrosia pumila), Dean's milk vetch (Astragalus deanei), south coast saltscale
(A triplex pacifica), Otay tarplant (Deinandra conjugens), variegated dudleya (Dudleya
variegata), San Diego goldenstar (Muilla clevandii), and mud nama (Nama stenocarpum). All
locations will be mapped with population estimates according to accepted standard survey
protocols. Foothill will document the results of the surveys in a technical letter report, which
will be submitted to the City for review. Based on the blooming periods for the specific species,
Foothill will survey each site twice, once in early spring (April) to capture the early bloomers
and once in late spring/early summer (June) to capture the late bloomers. All surveys will occur
in 2007.
Task 2.3 Wildlife/Plants Survevs and Habitat Mappin2 for the Concrete Lined Channel.
Foothill biologists will map the habitats in areas in the concrete lined channel that were not a part
of the "Constraints Analysis". Mapping of the locations of surveyed plant populations and
habitat in the unlined storm drain channel will be completed with a Trimble ProXRS GPS
(Global Positioning System) unit and integrated with mapping completed by Dudek for the other
sites.
Page 18
Agreement with Whitney Environmental Consulting, Inc.
dba Foothill Associates
February, 2007
7-25
Task 2.4 Wetland Delination.
Task 2.4.1 Potential Mitieation Site Wetland Delination. Concurrent with completion of the
focused biological surveys and, and if determined necessary by City staff, wetland delineation of
all potential mitigation sites will be re-evaluated based on direction received from the state and
federal agencies and City staff. This phase will be completed during the wet-season in order to
review sites and hydrology under these wet conditions. Observations will be recorded and
organized with dry-season information and provided to City staff. The delineation of potential
wetland sites does not necessarily need to conform to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers delineation
standards, but does need to be adequate to effectively characterize the general extent and type of
wetlands present.
Task 2.4.2 Concrete Channel Wetland Delineation (Ootional). The "Constraints Analysis"
included Wetlands Delineation for those sites covered in the report. If authorized by the City,
Foothill's biologists will map the drainages and wetland features in the concrete lined channel
that were not covered in the Biological Constraints Analysis. Mapping will be prepared
according to the methodologies of the California Department ofFish and Game and U.S. Army
Corps of Engineers. In addition, if it is determined by the City that an updated wetlands
delineation is required for the sites covered in the Biological Constraints Analysis, City will
authorize Foothill to update the previously prepared wetlands delineation for the drainage
facilities addressed in the Constraints Analysis. Boundary and attribute information of wetlands
and other features will be recorded using a Trimble ProXRS GPS unit and integrated with other
project mapping. All information will be compiled into a jurisdictional features map (ACOE and
CDFG) and report.
Task 3 - Preoare IS! MND - Foothill's Sub-Consultant David Evans and Associates (DEA)
will complete an Initial Study in accordance with California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Guidelines Section 15063 and Initial Study Checklist (CEQA Guidelines Appendix G). The
Initial Study will form the basis for the Environmental Analysis discussion in the Mitigated
Negative Declaration and will provide the necessary background for determining the potential
for significant environmental effects associated with the proposed project. One Initial Study
will be prepared for all of the drainage structures. The Initial Study document will address any
potential impact under all environmental issues. The specific purpose ofthe analysis in the Initial
Study will be to identifY all potential significant adverse environmental impacts and incorporate
mitigation measures to reduce or eliminate any adverse consequences. DEA will prepare a draft
Initial Study!MND document to include the following sections:
. Introduction.
. Environmental Setting.
. Project Description.
. Environmental Analysis.
. Mandatory Findings of Significance per CEQA
. Findings for a Habitat Loss and Incidental Take Permit (HUT) in accordance with the
City's MSCP Subarea Plan
. Appendix.
. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Page 19
Agreement with Whitney Environmental Consulting, Inc.
dba Foothill Associates
February, 2007
7-26
At this time it is anticipated that preparation of an MND would adequately meet the requirements
of CEQA. Following preparation of the Initial Study, City staff will review the Initial Study and
make a final determination as to the appropriate CEQA document for this project. If it is
determined that a Mitigated Negative Declaration is adequate, one document covering all of the
structures will be prepared. In situations where potential impacts may be site specific (i.e.,
biology, water quality, hydrology), a more detailed discussion will be provided within the
document for each study area. For impacts that are similar for each site (i.e., land use, traffic,
public services), a broader discussion can be provided that will cover all of the sites.
In compliance with AB 3 I 80 (PRC 2108 1.6), which requires the monitoring of mitigation
measures and reporting their implementation to ensure compliance as part of specific project
approvals, DEA will prepare the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the project as
part of the draft IS/MND. Implementation of the mitigation measures and the required
monitoring will be linked to specific stages of project development to ensure all mitigation
measures are implemented.
This scope of work does not include the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report (EIR) or
separate technical studies except as defined in Task 2 above. The draft IS/MND will be
presented to City staff for review and comment. DEA will revise the document as directed by
City staff.
Task 4: (CEQA) Public Review and Notices
Task 4.1 Notice of Intent (NO!) - In accordance with the City of Chula Vista Environmental
Review Guidelines, DEA will prepare an NO! for the project. DEA will incorporate comments
received on the NO! as determined appropriate by City staff.
Task 4.2 Notice of Availability - In accordance with the CEQA Guidelines and the City of
Chula Vista Environmental Review Procedures, DEA will prepare a_Notice of Completion for
the Draft IS/MND.
Task 5 - Final IS/MND.
Task 5.1 Responses to Comment. Upon completion of the 30-day public review period, DEA
will prepare written responses to all letters of comment received. All comments received in
response to the IS/MND will be discussed with the City and an approach to the responses will be
agreed upon prior to preparation of the responses. Draft responses to comments will be submitted
to City staff for review and comment. DEA will modifY the responses to comments as directed
by City staff.
Task 5.2 Preparation of Final IS/MND. DEA will revise the IS/MND as necessary to respond
to the comments received. The draft final IS/MND will be submitted to City staff for review and
comment. DEA will modify the final IS/MND in accordance with City staffs direction. The
Page 20
Agreement with Whitney Environmental Consulting, Inc.
dba Foothill Associates
February, 2007
7-27
Final IS/MND will include revisions to the draft IS/MND in strikeout/underline format,
comment letters and responses.
Task 6 - Permitting / Regulatory Compliance
Task 6.1 Preliminary A2encv Coordination. During initial review of project information,
Foothill will make initial informal contact with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE),
California Department ofFish and Game (CDFG), and Regional Water Quality Control Board
(RWQCB). Following completion of Task 1, Foothill, in coordination with City staff, will
initiate pre-application coordination with the agencies to determine the most appropriate and
efficient permitting strategy for the proposed maintenance work. At this time it is anticipated that
the following permits will be required
. U. S. Army Corps of Engineers: Standard Individual Permit (IP); negotiation ofa
Regional General Permit (RGP) to categorically permit these types of actions; or a
Memorandum of Understanding (MOU).
. California Department ofFish and Game: Section 1602 Streambed Alteration Agreement
(SAA); Master Streambed Alteration Agreement; or a Memorandum of Understanding
(MOU).
. Regional Water Quality Control Board: 401 Water Quality Certification; or a Master 401
Certification.
Foothill will be responsible for processing all permits regardless of which process is ultimately
determined by the City/agencies to be appropriate. Foothill will coordinate closely with City staff
and with each of the regulatory agencies throughout the process.
Task 6.2 Permit application preparation. Upon reaching agreement with each agency on the
proper permitting strategy, Foothill will prepare the necessary applications. This task includes
gathering all relevant project description and technical information, completing required permit
forms as determined by Task 6.1, and submitting a complete draft permit package to City staff
for review. The fee for this contract does not include the required agency fees. The City will pay
those fees directly.
Task 6.3 - Permit review process. Foothill will make all necessary revisions per City staff
comments, submitting required documents to the review agencies, and coordinate with the City
and the agencies to facilitate the review of application materials. The preparation of any new
technical studies required by the agencies is not included in this contract and will be subject to
negotiation between the City and Foothill. Foothill will prepare clear application materials that
include viable mitigation plans. This task will be closely linked to Tasks 7 and 8. This task
includes up to six (6) meetings in person and up to (15) teleconference calls in order to provide
coordination with City maintenance, engineering, and project management staff as well as the
relevant regulatory agencies. This task does not include stakeholder outreach or facilitation.
Page 21
Agreement with Whitney Environmental Consulting, Inc.
dba Foothill Associates
February, 2007
7-28
Task 6.4 - A!!encv coordination and review of miti!!ation strate!!v: Following City review
and approval of the Mitigation Strategic Plan, Foothill will incorporate the Plan into the formal
permit application materials, submit the information for review, and be available for discussion
as necessary. Foothill will facilitate and attend one joint field meeting with City staff and state
and federal agency staff. Revisions to the proposed mitigation strategy will be explored as
needed to respond to agency and City needs.
Task 6.5 - Issuance of State and Federal Permits. Foothill will facilitate the final approval of
all required permits from state and federal agencies. This task may include additional meetings
and/or submittal of additional information to the agencies.
Task 7 - Miti!!ation Strate!!ic Plan. In consultation with City staff, Foothill_will investigate a
variety of options for implementing the mitigation associated with the permit(s) including
potentially reducing impacts through modification of the project area; modification to the
methods proposed for maintenance activities that would either reduce or alleviate impacts;
opportunities for on-site mitigation through habitat preservation; restoration, enhancement, and
creation of habitats on or near the project facilities; purchasing credits in existing mitigation
banks; coordinated mitigation projects with other municipalities; establishing a mitigation bank
for the City's use on this and future projects; and any other options that surface through the
process
The Mitigation Strategic Plan will consist of a letter report that outlines mitigation requirements,
potential mitigation options for each area of impact, off-site mitigation areas considered and
Foothill's recommendations. The Mitigation Strategic Plan will also include preliminary cost
estimates for land acquisition, implementation, and maintenance and monitoring activities.
Foothill will also provide recommendations on strategies for implementing permit
mitigations/conditions including but not limited to funding, technical guidance,
logistical/operational guidance, etc.
Foothill will include all feasible mitigation proposals in the Mitigation Strategic Plan. Foothill
will present the proposed mitigation strategy to City staff and will be available for discussion and
questions as necessary. The Mitigation Strategic Plan will be included in the state and federal
agency permit application packages.
All mitigation proposed will be consistent with the City ofChula Vista MSCP Subarea Plan
including the Wetlands Protection Regulations, the Habitat Loss and Incidental Take (HUT)
ordinance, regulatory agency standards, and other relevant guidelines. In accordance with the
MSCP Subarea Plan, preference for off-site mitigation sites will be on sites within the City's
MSCP Preserve, within the same watershed and as close to the area of impact as feasible.
Preference will also be given to the area immediately surrounding each of the project facilities in
order to provide mitigation as close as possible to the impacted areas.
Task 7.1 Potential Miti!!ation Site Investi!!ation. Foothill will initiate an analytical GIS-based
search for possible mitigation sites based on the criteria identified in Task 6.1 and 6.3 to be
included in the Mitigation Strategic Plan. The analysis will be based on a variety of natural
Page 22
Agreement with Whitney Environmental Consulting, Inc.
dba Foothill Associates
February, 2007
7-29
resource and administrative information, including vegetation and habitat mapping, soils,
hydrology, topography/slope, land ownership, and conservation status. As a part of this task
Foothill will conduct field visits to potential sites, including the maintenance locations and the
immediate vicinity, and other areas highlighted in initial research and analysis. Initial field visits
will focus on basic characterization of the site, including its size, existing and adjacent habitats,
accessibility, and an analysis of the mitigation options present (restoration, enhancement,
creation). As scheduled, this phase will occur during the dry season, providing a view of the
sites' dry-season condition and hydrology. Observations will include photo documentation,
which will be recorded, saved for subsequent use, and made available for preliminary
coordination with the regulatory agencies.
Task 8 - Wetlands Mitieation and Monitorine Plan:
Task 8.1 - Draft Wetland Mitieation and Monitorine Plan - Assuming that some
combination of restoration, enhancement, and creation of wetland habitats will be necessary for
the proposed maintenance project, Foothill will prepare a draft conceptual wetlands mitigation
and monitoring plan that reflects the agency permit conditions. The Mitigation Plan will be
prepared in a format acceptable to City staff and the state and federal agencies, typically the u.s.
Army Corps of Engineers approved format. The Mitigation Plan will summarize the maintenance
project description, the associated habitat and jurisdictional impacts, and the required mitigation.
It will then describe the proposed mitigation site, summarize existing site conditions, and outline
the mitigation goals in detail. Container planting, seeding, weed eradication, irrigation, grading,
and other applicable design details will be included, along with logistical recommendations on
plant material sources, site preparation, installation methods, timing, erosion control, etc.
Specific, measurable, and realistic performance criteria will be presented as part of a detailed
maintenance and monitoring program. All information will be prepared so as to maximize the
ease of transitioning the mitigation project into construction drawings and specifications at a
later date.
Task 8.2 - Final Wetland Mitieation and Monitorine Plan
Following City staff and agency review ofthe Wetland Mitigation and Monitoring Plan, Foothill
will incorporate all revisions as directed by City staff into a final Wetland Mitigation and
Monitoring Plan.
B. Date for Commencement of Foothill Services:
( X ) Same as Effective Date of Agreement
( ) Other:
Page 23
Agreement with Whitney Enviromnental Consulting, Inc.
dba Foothill Associates
February, 2007
7-30
C. Dates or Time Limits for Delivery of Deliverables:
Deliverables
Foothill will provide to the City each one of the deliverables to the satisfaction of City staff,
including any and all revisions to documents that are the result of errors or omissions on the part
of Foothill Associates or its subcontractor. Revisions to deliverables necessary due to changes
made by the City to the scope of work including but not limited to the project area or method of
maintenance that create a need for revisions to the analysis or deliverables described herein are
beyond the scope of this Agreement.
Deliverable No. I: 5 printed copies and I electronic copy of the draft technical letter report
containing the results of each wildlife survey including maps of all detected
locations of sensitive species and occurrence information recorded
submitted to City staff for review.
Deliverable No.2: 5 printed copies and 1 electronic copy of the draft technical letter report
containing the results of plant surveys and habitat mapping. The locations
will be mapped with population estimates according to accepted standard
survey protocols. The letter report will be submitted to City stafffor review.
Deliverable No.3: 5 printed copies and I electronic copy of the draft technical letter report
containing the result of all wildlife and plant surveys and habitat mapping
for the concrete lined channel.
Deliverable No.4: 5 printed copies and I electronic copy of the final technical letter reports
(Deliverables I, 2 and 3) incorporating revisions from City staff review
Deliverable No.5: 5 printed copies and I electronic copy of the Screencheck Draft Initial
Study/MND and appendices
Deliverable No.6: 2 printed copies and I electronic copy of Revised Initial Study and
appendices
Deliverable No.7: I printed copies and I electronic copy of Draft Notice ofInitial Study (NO!)
Deliverable No.8: I printed copies and I electronic copy of Final Notice ofInitial Study (NO!)
including City staff revisions
Deliverable No.9: I printed copy and I electronic copy of draft Notice of Availability (NOA)
Deliverable No. 10: I printed copy and I electronic copy of Final Notice of Availability (NOA)
including City staff revisions
Page 24
Agreement with Whitney Environmental Consulting, Inc.
dba Foothill Associates
February, 2007
7-31
Deliverable No. II: 50 copies and 1 electronic copy of Draft IS/MND with appendices for
distribution during the public review period
Deliverable No. 12: 5 copies and I electronic copy of draft responses to comment letters for City
staff review
Deliverable No. 13: 5 copies and I electronic copy Draft Final IS/MND including revisions to
address comment letters for City staff review
Deliverable No. 14: 25 copies and 1 electronic copy of Final Initial Study/MND
Deliverable No. 15: 1 printed copy and I electronic (pdt) copy of each draft agency permit for
review prior to initial submittal to regulatory agencies.
Deliverable No. 16: 5 printed copies and I electronic copy of the Mitigation Strategic Plan for
City review.
Deliverable No. 17: 5 printed copies and I electronic copy ofthe Revised Mitigation Strategic
Plan, per City comments.
Deliverable No. 18: 5 printed copies and I electronic copy of the Draft Conceptual Wetlands
Mitigation and Monitoring Plan. Text will be delivered in MS Word and/or
Adobe Acrobat format. Maps and drawings can be delivered in GIS, CAD,
or PDF formats.
Deliverable No. 19: 5 printed copies and I electronic copy of the Final Conceptual Wetlands
Mitigation and Monitoring Plan
Deliverable No. 20: I printed copy and 1 electronic copy of each final agency permit.
C. Dates or Time Limits for Delivery of Deliverables:
Deliverable No. I: 2 weeks after the wildlife surveys are completed
Deliverable No.2: 2 weeks after the plant survey is completed
Deliverable No.3: 2 weeks after the wildlife and plant survey is completed
Deliverable No.4: I week after Foothill receives City staffs comments on Deliverables
I, 2 and 3
Deliverable No.5: I week after Deliverable No.4 is completed
Deliverable No.6: 1 week after Foothill receives City staffs comments on
Deliverable 5
Page 25
Agreement with Whitney Environmental Consulting, Inc.
dba Foothill Associates
February, 2007
7-32
Deliverable No.7: 30 days after effective date of the Agreement
Deliverable No.8: 3 working days after Foothill receives City staffs comments on
Deliverable 7
Deliverable No.9: Concurrent with Deliverable 5
Deliverable No. 10: Concurrent with Deliverable II
Deliverable No. II: I week after Foothill receives City staffs comments on Deliverable
6 and final City staff approval to print documents
Deliverable No. 12: I week after the close of the public review period
Deliverable No. 13: 1 week after Deliverable 12
Deliverable No. 14: 1 week after Foothill receives City staffs comments on Deliverable
13
Deliverable No. 15: 4 weeks after submittal of Deliverable No.4
Deliverable No. 16: Concurrent with Deliverable No.4
Deliverable No. 17: 2 weeks after receiving City staffs comments on Deliverable #16
Deliverable No. 18: 2 weeks after receiving appropriate agency approval of Mitigation
Strategic Plan during agency review of permit applications.
Deliverable No. 19: I week after Foothill receives City staffs comments on Deliverable
17 and final City staff approval to print documents
Deliverable No. 20: I week after Foothill receives City staffs comments on Deliverable
15 and final City staff approval to print documents
Deliverable No. 21: Meetings
The following meetings are included in the contract:
. Initial kick off meeting upon final approval of the Agreement to be attended by
city staff and Foothill team;
. One meeting with City staff and Foothill team for Foothill to present the proposed
mitigation strategy to City staff and be available for discussion and questions as
necessary;
Page 26
Agreement with Whitney Environmental Consulting, Inc.
dba Foothill Associates
February, 2007
7-33
. Up to six coordination meetings with City staff and/or permitting agencies and
Foothill as necessary throughout the agency permitting process, and;
. One joint field meeting with City staff and agency staff that Foothill will facilitate
and attend.
D. Date for completion of all Foothill's services: Mav 15. 2008
9. Materials Required to be Supplied by City to Foothill:
The City will provide all necessary proj ect information and related resources including, but
not limited to the following:
.:. A full and detailed project description, including locations, limits, proposed work,
maintenance methods and equipment, standard frequency and scheduling of maintenance,
required access paths or staging areas that fall outside of the maintenance areas, etc. as
well as any relevant available information on the initial construction of the basins (dates,
prior conditions).
.:. Any available spatial data relevant to the project, including GIS base mapping and
biological mapping, CAD files, and aerial imagery.
.:. Copies of any relevant watershed plans, restoration master plans, community plans,
departmental guidelines, or similar information that may not be readily available public
information and that may provide guidelines or restrictions relevant to the project.
10. Compensation:
A. ( ) Single Fixed Fee Arrangement.3
For performance of all of the Defined Services by Consultant as herein required, City shall
pay a single fixed fee in the amounts and at the times or milestones or for the Deliverables set
forth below:
Single Fixed Fee Amount:
, payable as follows:
Milestone or Event or Deliverable
Amount or Percent of Fixed Fee
3. The difference between a single fixed fee amount with phased payments and a phased fixed
fee amount is that, in a single fixed fee amount all of the work is required for all of the
compensation. Payments are phased to help with consultant cash flow. In a phased fixed fee
arrangement, the City has the authority to cancel or require performance under subsequent
phases, so that the compensation is due just for the phase of work required, and not for the
total amount.
Page 27
Agreement with Whitney Environmental Consulting, Inc.
dba Foothill Associates
February, 2007
7-34
( ) 1. Interim Monthly Advances. The City shall make interim monthly advances
against the compensation due for each phase on a percentage of completion basis for
each given phase such that, at the end of each phase only the compensation for that
phase has been paid. Any payments made hereunder shall be considered as interest
free loans that must be returned to the City if the Phase is not satisfactorily
completed. If the Phase is satisfactorily completed, the City shall receive credit
against the compensation due for that phase. The retention amount or percentage set
forth in Paragraph 19 is to be applied to each interim payment such that, at the end of
the phase, the full retention has been held back from the compensation due for that
phase. Percentage of completion of a phase shall be assessed in the sole and
unfettered discretion by the Contracts Administrator designated herein by the City, or
such other person as the City Manager shall designate, but only upon such proof
demanded by the City that has been provided, but in no event shall such interim
advance payment be made unless the Contractor shall have represented in writing that
said percentage of completion of the phase has been performed by the Contractor.
The practice of making interim monthly advances shall not convert this agreement to
a time and materials basis of payment.
B. ( ) Phased Fixed Fee Arrangement.
For the performance of each phase or portion of the Defined Services by Consultant as are
separately identified below, City shall pay the fixed fee associated with each phase of Services,
in the amounts and at the times or milestones or Deliverables set forth. Consultant shall not
commence Services under any Phase, and shall not be entitled to the compensation for a Phase,
unless City shall have issued a notice to proceed to Consultant as to said Phase.
Phase
1.
2.
3.
Fee for Said Phase
$
$
$
( ) 1. Interim Monthly Advances. The City shall make interim monthly advances
against the compensation due for each phase on a percentage of completion basis for
each given phase such that, at the end of each phase only the compensation for that
phase has been paid. Any payments made hereunder shall be considered as interest
free loans that must be returned to the City if the Phase is not satisfactorily
completed. If the Phase is satisfactorily completed, the City shall receive credit
against the compensation due for that phase. The retention amount or percentage set
forth in Paragraph 19 is to be applied to each interim payment such that, at the end of
the phase, the full retention has been held back from the compensation due for that
phase. Percentage of completion of a phase shall be assessed in the sole and
unfettered discretion by the Contracts Administrator designated herein by the City, or
Page 28
Agreement with Whitney Environmental Consulting, Inc.
dba Foothill Associates
February, 2007
7-35
such other person as the City Manager shall designate, but only upon such proof
demanded by the City that has been provided, but in no event shall such interim
advance payment be made unless the Contractor shall have represented in writing that
said percentage of completion of the phase has been performed by the Contractor.
The practice of making interim monthly advances shall not convert this agreement to
a time and materials basis of payment.
C. ( ) Hourly Rate Arrangement
For performance of the Defined Services by Foothill as required by this Agreement, City
shall pay Foothill for the productive hours of time spent by Foothill in the performance of said
Services, at the rates or amounts set forth in the Rate Schedule below according to the following
terms and conditions:
(I) (X)
Not-to-Exceed Limitation on Time and Materials Arrangement
Notwithstanding the expenditure by Foothill of time and materials in excess of the
Maximum Compensation amount, Foothill agrees that Foothill will perform all of the
Defined Services required of Foothill for $113,401 without the optional task, and
$120,081 with the optional task, including all Materials, and other "reimbursables"
("Maximum Compensation").
Pursuant to Section Section l.D ofthis Agreement, the Director of Public Works
Operations in his sole discretion, independently, and upon request from Foothill, may
from time to time, negotiate additional services to be performed by the Foothill under this
Agreement {"Additional Service"). The cost of the Additional Services in connection
with the environmental document shall not exceed $30,000.
(2) ( ) Limitation without Further Authorization on Time and Materials Arrangement
At such time as Foothill shall have incurred time and materials equal to
("Authorization Limit"), Consultant shall not be entitled
to any additional compensation without further authorization issued in writing and
approved by the City. Nothing in this Agreement shall preclude Foothill from providing
additional Services at Foothill's own cost and expense.
Category of Employee
Dick Rol
MikeHoward
Sheri Dister
Rate Schedule
Name of Consultant
Foothill Associates
Foothill Associates
Foothill Associates
Hourly Rate
$ 130
$ 115
$ 110
Page 29
Agreement with Whitney Environmental Consulting, Inc.
dba Foothill Associates
February, 2007
7-36
David Bise Foothill Associates $ 100
Craig Richardson Foothill Associates $ 65
Rachelle Mundo Foothill Associates $ 50
Erik Evans Foothill Associates $ 65
Ryan Birdseye David Evans Associates $ 153
Josephine Alido David Evans Associates $105
Emery McCaffery David Evans Associates $77
( X) Hourly rates may increase by 6% for services rendered after February, 2008, if
delay in providing services is caused by City.
11. Materials Reimbursement Arrangement
For the cost of out of pocket expenses incurred by Foothill in the performance of services
required by this Agreement, City shall pay Foothill at the rates or amounts set forth below:
( ) None, the compensation includes all costs.
Cost or Rate
$ 25 per MND
$
$ 0.485 per mile
$0.10 per page
$
$
$
$
$3 per CD
$
(X) Reports, not to exceed $ 1772:
() Copies, not to exceed $
() Travel, not to exceed $ 2280:
() Printing, not to exceed $ 2200:
() Postage, not to exceed $
() Delivery, not to exceed $
() Long Distance Telephone Charges, not to exceed $
() Other Actual Identifiable Direct Costs:
compact discs, not to exceed $ 30:
, not to exceed $
12. Contract Administrators:
City: Marilyn R. F. Ponseggi, Environmental Review Coordinator
Foothill: Kathleen M.C. Kirsh, Vice President
Page 30
Agreement with Whitney Environmental Consulting, Inc.
dba Foothill Associates
February, 2007
7-37
13. Liquidated Damages Rate:
( ) $
( ) Other:
per day.
14. Statement of Economic Interests, Consultant Reporting Categories, per Conflict ofInterest
Code:
( X ) Not Applicable. Not an FPPC Filer.
( ) FPPC Filer
( ) Category No.1. Investments and sources of income.
( ) Category No.2. Interests in real property.
( ) Category No.3. Investments, interest in real property and sources of income subject
to the regulatory, permit or licensing authority of the department.
( ) Category No.4. Investments in business entities and sources of income that engage in
land development, construction or the acquisition or sale of real property.
( ) Category No.5. Investments in business entities and sources of income of the type
which, within the past two years, have contracted with the City of Chula Vista
(Redevelopment Agency) to provide services, supplies, materials, machinery or
equipment.
( ) Category No.6. Investments in business entities and sources of income of the type
which, within the past two years, have contracted with the designated employee's
department to provide services, supplies, materials, machinery or equipment.
( ) Category No.7. Business positions.
( ) List "Consultant Associates" interests in real property within 2 radial miles of Project
Property, if any:
Page 31
Agreement with Whitney Environmental Consulting, Inc.
dba Foothill Associates
February, 2007
7-38
IS. ( ) Consultant is Real Estate Broker and/or Salesman
16. Permitted Subconsultants:
David Evans Associates
17. Bill Processing:
A. Foothill's Billing to be submitted for the following period of time:
(X )Monthly
( ) Quarterly
( ) Other:
B. Day of the Period for submission of Foothill's Billing:
(X) First ofthe Month
( ) 15th Day of each Month
( ) End of the Month
( ) Other:
C. City's Account Number:
18. Security for Performance
( ) Performance Bond, $
( ) Letter of Credit, $
( ) Other Security:
Type:
Amount: $
(X) Retention. If this space is checked, then notwithstanding other provisions to the contrary
requiring the payment of compensation to Foothill sooner, the City shall be entitled to
retain, at their option, either the following "Retention Percentage" or "Retention Amount"
until the City determines that the Retention Release Event, listed below, has occurred:
(X) Retention Percentage: 10%
( ) Retention Amount: $
Retention Release Event:
(X) Completion of All Foothill's Services
( ) Other:
Foothills2PTY
Page 32
Agreement with Whitney Environmental Consulting, Inc.
dba Foothill Associates
February, 2007
7-39
7-40
pXW.Sli!sel:fI$~3rOJd e 'Mea.,Sl:>3[OId Nlll,^:lJ\f\SID\sddB\OOO~IoIlt..\ -eISIA Bln\l:JjO ~I!O
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA STATEMENT
~Vf:.. CITY OF
J- (HUlA VISTA
2/20/07, Item t
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
RESOLUTION ACCEPTING AND APPROPRIATING
$80,285 IN UNANTICIPATED REVENUES AWARDED TO THE
CITY OF CIlliLA VISTA, AS THE LEAD AGENCY FOR THE
SOUTH BAY USED OIL RECYCLING PROGRAM FROM THE
CALIFORNIA INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT
BOARD'S USED MOTOR OIL RECYCLING BLOCK GRANT
FOR 2006-2007, 12TH CYCLE
DIRECTOR OF G~RAL SERVICES ~~,
CITY MANAGER d I .
ITEM TITLE:
4/STHS VOTE: YES 1?51 NO D
BACKGROUND
The California Used Oil Enhancement Act (1999) requires the collection of four cents for every
quart of lubricating oil sold, transferred and imported into California from oil manufacturers.
Chula Vista consumers pay four cents per quart into the fund when they purchase oil. The Act
mandates that the California Integrated Waste Management Board (CIWMB) use a portion of the
funds to provide block grants to local governments for used oil programs that encourage used oil
and oil filter recycling. Chula Vista is the lead agency for the Used Oil Recycling Program for
the South Bay cities ofChula Vista, Imperial Beach and National City.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
Not applicable.
RECOMMENDATION
That Council adopt the resolution accepting a grant from the California Integrated Waste
Management Board Used Oil Enhancement Act, Cycle 12 and appropriate $55,285 in
unanticipated revenues for the FY07 supplies and services budget and $25,000 to the FY07
personnel services budget of the Waste Management Recycling Fund.
BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
Not applicable.
8-1
2/20/07, Item~
Page 2 of2
DISCUSSION
This grant is a "regional" program that includes the cities of Chula Vista, Imperial Beach, and
National City. The program targets regional watershed protection issues that affect all the cities
that share the South Bay watershed. The primary purpose of this block grant is to provide
alternatives to illegal disposal of used motor oil in storm drains, fields and waterways, through a
network of collection opportunities and outreach efforts designed to inform and motivate the
public to recycle used oil.
This grant will continue to provide technical assistance and new supplies for approximately 33
free used oil recycling drop-off centers and curbside collection programs in Chula Vista,
National City and Imperial Beach.
The public education component will allow the City to continue to provide advertising, portable
displays, point of purchase displays, the Used Oil Hotline, billing inserts, bottles, funnels and
drain pans. This will also allow staff to have a booth at the various car shows throughout the
South Bay, reaching out to our target audience the "Do It Yourselfers" (DrYers).
This grant cycle also includes work at the marina providing boaters an alternative disposal option
for oil contaminated bilge water and motor oil other than dumping it in the bay.
DECISION MAKER CONFLICT
Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site
specific and consequently the 500 foot rule found in California Code of Regulations section
18704.2(a)(1) is not applicable to this decision.
FISCAL IMPACT
The grant will provide $80,285 to implement used oil recycling education and promotion through
the 2006/2007 fiscal year. There is no additional fiscal impact as a result of the recommended
action to adopt the attached resolution. The program does not require matching funds.
ATTACHMENTS
1. Grant Agreement
Prepared by: Lynn France, Conservation Coordinator, General Services Department
M:\General Services\GS Administration\Council Agenda\Environmental\UBG12 AIl3, 2-2Q-06.doc
8-2
e
LINDAS.ADAMS
SECRETARY FOR
ENVIRONM ENTAL PROTECTION
MARGO REIn BROWN
CHAIR
MBROWN@CIWMB.CA.GOV
(916) 341-6051
JEFFREY DANZINGER
JDANZINGER@CIWMB.CA.GOY
(916) 341-6024
I
I
ROSALIE MULE
lLVlULE@CIWMB.CA.GOY
(916) 341-6016
GARY PETERSEN
GPETERSEN@CIWMB.CA.GOV
(916) 34,-6035
WESLEY CHESBRO
WCHESBRO@CIWMB.CA,GOV
(916) 341-6039
.......
.......
.......
'.....
1'11...
""".""~TH>
W"",",;
~HSA'''_M''''r
II."'''''
.t:.._-"-T.:.\CH~1EN'7
I
CALIFORNIA INTEGRATED
WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD
ARNOW SCHWARZENEGGEl
GOVERNOR
1001 I STREET, SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95814. P.O. Box 4025, SACRAMENTO, CALlFORNIA9S812-4025
(916) 341-6000. WWW.CIWMB.CA.GOV
CERTIFIED MAIL
January 19, 2007
Manuel Medrano
City of Chula Vista
Resource & Waste Management Services
1800 Maxwell Road
Chula Vista, CA 91911
Dear Mr. Medrano:
NOTICE TO PROCEED - Used Oil Block Grant (12'h Cycle)
Grant Number: UBG12-06-28
This letter authorizes you to begin incurring costs under the Block Grant 12 (UBG12)
Terms and Conditions and Procedures and Requirements. Any UBG12 expenditures
which occurred prior to the NTP but after July 1, 2006, will be covered by the Procedures
and Requirements for the BG12th cycle.
Enclosed is a copy of your executed Grant Agreement cover sheet. Refer to Exhibit A:
Terms and Conditions and Exhibit B: Procedures and Requirements that were sent to
you with the original Grant Agreement for all reporting requirements. Supplemental
information is also available on our website at
http://www.ciwmb.ca.oov/UsedOil/Grants/Block/Supplemental. Please contact your
Grant Manager if you need an additional copy of the Terms and Conditions and the
Procedures and Requirements.
Also enclosed is a copy of New Administrative Requirement for AI! Open Used Oil Block
Grants: Submission of Supporting Documentation with Payment Requests. This notice
describes a new requirement that invoices must be submitted for all Block Grant
expenditures after July 1, 2006.
For downloadable copies of payment request forms and reporting forms, refer to our
website http://www.ciwmb.ca.oov/HHW/Forms/.
Your cooperation in keeping the Used Oil Program up-to-date of any changes to primary
contact, your address, telephone number, or other pertinent information will be
appreciated.
If you have any questions regarding this Grant Agreement, your project or the required
reports, please contact your Grant Manager. Future correspondence related to this Grant
Agreement should be to your Grant Manager's attention.
Sincerely,
{]3onnie Comwa((
Bonnie Cornwall, Acting Branch Manager
Used Oil and Household Hazardous Waste Program
Enclosure: Executed Grant Agreement and New Administrative Requirement for All Open
Used Oil Block Grants: Submission of Supporting Documentation with Payment Request
@
ORiGINAL PRlfof1"ED ON 100 % POST-CONSUMER CONTENT, PROCESSEDCHLORlNE FREE PAPER
8-3
STATE OF CALIFORNIA _ ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
GRANT AGREEMENT
CALIFORNIA INTEGRATED WASTE MANAGEMENT BOARD
CIWM6110 (NEW 10/96)
GRANT NUMBER
UBG12-06-28
NAME OF GRANT PROGRAM
2006/2007 Used Oil Black Grants - Twelfth Cycle
GRANT RECIPIENTS NMlE
Ci of Chula Vista
TAXPAYER'S FEDERAL EMPLOYER IDENTIFICATION NU~BER
TOTAL GRANT AMOUNT NOT TO EXCEED
580,285.00
TERM OF GRANT AGREEMENT
FROM:
Jul 01, 2006
TO: June 30, 2009
THIS AGREEMENT is made and entered into on th,is 8th day of Seotember 2006, by the State of California, acting through the Executive Director of the
California Integrated Waste Management Board (the "State~) and City of Chula Vista (the ~Grantee"). The State ~nd the Grantee, in mutual consideration of the
promises made herein, agree as follows:
The Grantee further agrees to abide by the provisions of the following exhibits attached hereto:
--~'--'-:"~';'-\\ ,';;-"": .< ! ,:' '-:_':, "'-~""'" ':' , ,'-, ,---'---.
Exhibits A, 8, andC.atta_ch-edhereto arid.the State approved, .application are incorporated by 'reference her,ein and~made',3-part hereof.
The State agrees ic;> fqnp, WQl~_ ddQe_~'y Vie :Grantee in' ac?orqance with this Agreement up to the Total Amount" Not-,to;.9ceed specified herein.
'_ I .'_ ._ _ ...-'- " .' . .- '.',....;
Exhibit A. Terms & Conditions
Exhibit 8 - Procedures & Requirements
Exhibit C - Special Focus Programs for Used Oil Black Grants '
~--'
_ __"': _ ~-~'~- r,c . '.
i,
IN WITNESS WHE~EOF, the parties hereto _have execu;ed this Agreement as of the dates entered below.
CALIFORNIA INTEGRATEO WASTE MANAGEMENT SOARO
GRAN~EE'S N~E (PRINT ORTfPE)
City of Chula'Vista
SIGNATURE
GRANTEE'S SIGNATURE
tJ(,.
Mark Leary, Executive Director
TITLE
Cen ' G ~."
AuthO~ rese~teOOf"~ ',' ....'t=". ' II 3CJ
GRANTEE'S ADDRESS (INCLUDE STREET, Clrt. STATE AND ZI
1'000 fI1ou{.wdi K0<l.cl
C~ Vl>;t" , Q\- eMi \
AMOUNT ENCUMBERED BY THIS
AGREEMENT
CERTIFICATION OF FUNDING
PROGRAM/CATEGORY (CODE AND TITLE)
- - -FUND TITLE
2006/2007 Used Oil Black Grants - Twelfth Cycle
OIL
580,285.00
(OPTIONAL USE)
PRIOR AMOUNT ENCUMBERED
FOR THIS AGREEMENT
'3910-602-0100
BJECTOFEXPENOlTURE (CODE AND TITLE) .
STATUTE
FISCAL YEAR
ITEM
TOT.b..l.b..MOUNT ENCUMBERED TO
DATE .'
580,285.00.
1991
2006/2007
-jdiid-7516ll't02
I hereby certify upon my awn personal kn(Jwledge that 9u<jgetedfunds- are available
for the peri' andpurpo~e of the expenditure stated above'.
SIGNATU OF CCOUNTJNG OFFICER
T.BA. NO.
B.R. NO.
DATE
q ( :ld
/
8-4
RESOLUTION NO 2007-
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING AND
APPROPRIATING $80,285 IN UNANTICIPATED
REVENUES AWARDED TO THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA, AS THE LEAD AGENCY FOR THE SOUTH
BA Y USED OIL RECYCLING PROGRAM FROM THE
CALIFORNIA INTEGRA TED WASTE MANAGEMENT
BOARD'S USED OIL RECYCLING BLOCK GRANT
FOR 2006/2007, 12TH CYCLE.
WHEREAS, the California Integrated Waste Management Board provides Block
Grant opportunities for funding Used Oil Recycling Disposal and Education Programs;
and
WHEREAS, staff submitted the Block Grant application on behalf of the South
Bay Regional Used Oil Recycling Program serving Chula Vista, Imperial Beach and
National City for the period of July 1,2006 through June 30, 2009; and
WHEREAS, the City received a regional grant award of $80,285 from the
California Integrated Waste Management Board in November 2006; and
WHEREAS, Staff will be using these funds to promote the practice of proper
disposal and recycling of used oil and oil filters.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Chula Vista accepts a grant in the amount of $80,285 from the California Integrated
Waste Management Board Used Oil Block Grant program and appropriate the amount to
the Personnel, Supplies and Services budget of the Waste Management Recycling fund of
the General Services Department, based upon unanticipated revenues.
Presented by
Approved as to form by
Jack Griffin
Director General Services
r-
8-5
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA STATEMENT
j}\~ CllYOF
~CHUlA VISTA
FEBRUARY 20, 2007, Item~
ITEM TITLE:
FORMATION OF THE CITY OF;)HU A VISTA HEALTH
CARE COMMISSION
ASSISTANT CITy;rNAGER
CITY MANAGER if I
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
4/5THS VOTE: YES D NO [!]
BACKGROUND
At the meeting of January 9, 2007 the City Council directed staff to investigate the
appropriate role and function of a city Health Care Commission for purposes of assisting
regional efforts to provide a strong health care infrastructure for South Bay.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed activity for
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined
that the activity is not a "Project" as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA
Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines, the
activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is necessary.
RECOMMENDATION
Approve in concept the formation of the Chula Vista Health Care Commission and
provide additional direction to staff for the drafting of an ordinance by the City
Attorney's office.
BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
Not Applicable
DISCUSSION
The City Council has requested that staff prepare a report and recommendation for the
establishment of a Chula Vista Heath Care Commission. This report provides a general
outline for the Commission's purpose and function based on earlier Council input.
However, staff is asking for more detailed direction from the Council on the following
items required for formation by ordinance:
. Purpose and intent
. Functions and duties
9-1
FEBRUARY 20, 2007, Item~
Page 2 of 4
. Membership
. Term of office
. Operations of the Commission
The realm of health care delivery is complex and intersects private industry, non-profit
health care agencies and Federal and State Government. Local governments - primarily
County government, acting as an arm of the State, are engaged in overseeing the health-
care safety net for indigent people, public health programs, and coordinating disaster
preparedness programs.
Cities in California typically are not directly engaged in the delivery of health care.
However, overall resident access to quality heath care providers and emergency services
are critical to a community's well being and are among its many quality oflife indicators.
As such, it may be appropriate for Chula Vista to actively engage in monitoring and
lobbying for a strong health care infrastructure in South County.
Suggested Purpose and Intent
The Chula Vista Health Care Commission will serve as an advisory body to the Chula
Vista City Council; a resource for researching and providing advice and
recommendations on matters pertinent to advancing quality health care to the residents of
Chula Vista.
Suggested Functions and Duties
Staff has identified, with the assistance of Scripps and Sharp hospital staff, three key
areas that would benefit from the oversight of a Health Care Commission.
1) The Chula Vista Health Care Commission will lead efforts to influence
legislative change at the State and Federal levels to make possible sufficient
health care capacity and emergency care for existing and future residents of
Chula Vista.
Local health care providers suffer from unacceptably low federal reimbursement rates
and emergency room reimbursement rates for undocumented immigrants. These rates are
lower than the cost of providing this mandatory service and are impacting their ability to
remain cost competitive in the South Bay region. The pressure of rising costs and low
reimbursement for uninsured patients undermines long term viability of our hospitals. In
addition, the threatened closure of Paradise Valley Hospital and the potential closure of
UCSD's hospital in Hillcrest may affect the region's safety net and capacity-- further
endangering access and capacity in South Bay. Similarly, State seismic retrofitting
requirements for hospitals are placing unfunded burdens on hospitals that could have the
unintended affect of forcing hospital closures.
An active Health Care Commission could provide leadership in suggesting and
supporting appropriate legislative changes to State and Federal laws on these and other
issues that could affect Chula Vista residents.
9-2
FEBRUARY 20, 2007, Item~
Page 3 of 4
2. The Chula Vista Health Care Commission will assess and provide an annual
report on the "State of Health Care" in Chula Vista.
Similar to the annual report prepared by the city's Growth Management Oversight
Commission, the Health Care Commission would be charged with assessing key quality
of life indicators specific to but not limited to: access to health care, quality and diversity
of services, physical infrastructure, emergency preparedness, and access to emergency
services. This report would be foundational to developing strategic legislative positions.
3. The Chula Vista Health Care Commission will assess and make
recommendations on land use policies and planning that could impact future
development and expansion of hospital and other health care facilities in Chula
Vista
The Chula Vista Health Care Commission will provide direct input and advice to the
Planning and Building and Community Development Departments on key strategies and
policies to enhance medical and healthcare facilities within Chula Vista, thereby
providing greater access and capacity to South Bay residents.
Suggested Membership
. Nwnber of members: seven - nine
. Appointed by the City Council
. Residents of the City of Chula Vista
. The Council may wish to designate certain qualifications relating to health care
. The Council may wish to add members from the Health Care Industry and Public
Health Department of the County as ex-officio members
Suggested Terms of Office
. Established generally as four -year staggered terms with a two- term limit as
provided in other City established commissions.
Suggested Staff Assistance and Funding
The City Manager and City Clerk may make available staff and clerical support as
requested and is available. To complete its annual "State of Health Care" report the
Commission may request funding during the City's budget cycle for consulting services
specializing in assessing health care.
Operations ofthe Commission
The Commission shall follow the general rules of conduct as other City established
commissions (e.g. meeting place, times of meetings, selection of chair and vice chair,
resolutions, etc).
9-3
FEBRUARY 20, 2007, Item~
Page 4 of 4
DECISION MAKER CONFLICT
Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is
not site specific and consequently the 500 foot rule found in California Code of
Regulations section 18704.2(a)(1) is not applicable to this decision.
FISCAL IMPACT
There is no direct fiscal impact associated with accepting this report and providing
additional direction to staff regarding the formation of a Health Care Commission. When
the formal action to approve formation of the Commission is brought to the City Council,
it will include anticipated operation expenses (staff time to support the commission,
consulting costs for specialized services, etc.).
ATTACHMENTS
None
Prepared by: Dana M. Smith. Assistant City Manager. Development Services
9-4
CITY COUNCIL
AGENDA STATEMENT
~<:::. CITY OF
-~ CHUIA VISTA
2/20/07, Item ~
SUBMITTED BY:
RESOLUTION APPROPRIATING FUNDS FROM THE
PUBLIC FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE FUND FOR
THE CONSTRUCTION OF PHASE 3 OF THE CNIC CENTER
RENOVATION PROJECT (GG-300)
DIRECTOR OF GENERAL SERVICE~~_
DIRECTOR OF FINffCE ;><<' f.L- /'ltL-\.J
CITY MANAGER 1/
ITEM TITLE:
REVIEWED BY:
4/STHS VOTE: YES !81 NO 0
BACKGROUND
In July of 2001, the City Council approved a master plan for the renovation of the Civic Center.
On February 18, 2003, the City Council approved a Design Build Agreement ("Agreement")
with Highland Partnership, Inc. ("HPI") to design and construct the project. On August 3, 2004,
the City Council approved the Guaranteed Maximum Price ("GMP") of the project at
$38,346,000. The GMP reflects the amount to be paid to the design builder for design and
construction. The total project budget approved by City Council on August 3, 2004 was
$50,148,000. This action appropriates the funds to construct the third and final phase of the
project in accordance with those previous City Council actions.
Phase 3 of the Civic Center project is funded by a combination of the Public Facility
Development Impact Fee Fund (88.87%) and the General Fund (11.13%). The first two phases
of the project have been completed in accordance with the budget approved by the City Council.
The Public Facility Development Impact Fee Fund ("PFDIF") was established to fund a number
of specific projects in the City, including the Civic Center Renovations. The PFDIF funds may
only be used for those projects specifically approved by the City Council in the ordinance
establishing the PFDIF and its subsequent amendments.
Phase 3 of the project includes the renovation of the former police department building, the
demolition of the Legislative Office Building and the Community Development Building and the
construction of the additional parking and landscaped areas. The renovated former police
department building will house the Human Resources Department, Community Development
Department, Recreation Department, Information Technology Systems Department, a portion of
the Building and Planning Department and the Chula Vista Employees Credit Union.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW
The project has been approved under a Mitigated Negative Declaration, IS-04-013.
)0 -I
2/20/07, Item J.O...-
Page 2 of7
RECOMMENDATION
That Council adopt the resolution.
BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION
None.
DISCUSSION
Pro;ect Descrivtion
The Civic Center project has three construction phases. Phase 1 was the demolition and
reconstruction of City Hall. That phase was substantially completed in November of 2005.
Phase 2 was the renovation of the Public Services Building ("PSB"). That phase was
substantially completed in January of2007. The final phase is the renovation of the former police
department building and the demolition of the Legislative Office Building and Community
Development Building. The total project budget for the project that the Council approved on
August 3, 2004 is $50,148,000. The GMP, the portion that is paid to the City's Design Builder,
HPI, for this project, is $38,346,000. The GMP covers all design and construction related costs
of the project. The remaining funds in the budget beyond the GMP are utilized for a variety of
purposes including furniture, fixtures and equipment, project insurance, staff time, consultant
services, etc.
As stated above, the first phase of the project was substantially completed in November 2005.
The phase included the demolition of the 18,300 square foot City Hall and construction of the
new facility. The actual cost of Phase 1 was $22,233,610 which translates into $542,390 below
the approved budget.
In an effort to make the multi-year, multi-phase project as fiscally efficient as possible, the
design costs for Phases 2 and 3 and the vast majority of the project insurance costs were all
included in Phase 1. Additionally, some materials such as doors, flooring, ceiling tiles, etc. were
purchased for all three phases during Phase 1. The addition of these costs brought the total Phase
1 budget up to $25,283,854. Through January 17, 2007, the total amount expended for Phase 1
was $24,793,162. Staff is in the process of closing Phase 1 and does not expect any additional
expenditures.
Phase 2 included the renovation of the 29,700 square foot Public Services Building (PSB). The
Budget that was approved for Phase 2 was $12,357,000. In addition to that, $537,823 of the
Phase 1 savings was transferred into Phase 2, bringing the total Phase 2 budget up to
$12,894,823. While there are still some outstanding bills to be paid, it appears that the final cost
of Phase 2 will be $12,807,465 which translates into $87,358 below the approved budget.
At the time that Phase 2 was financed, Council also approved the addition of some Phase 3 costs.
The financing included all of the Phase 2 costs incurred during Phase 2 and reimbursement of
some of the costs in Phase I for Phases 2 and 3 that were not part of the Phase 1 financing.
Table 1 below provides a summary of how the Phase 2 bond proceeds have been expended:
/~~;;-
2120/07, Item~
Page 3 of7
Table 1.
Expenditure
Amount
Running
Balance
$17,183,964 Starting Balance
NIC Improvements
Phase I Reimbursements (for Phase 2 and 3)
Phase 2 Costs less reimbursement
Phase 3 Costs less reimbursement
Bond Proceeds Available to Move Forward
$0
$1,824,736
$3,046,293
$11,044,005
$263,665
$17,183,964
$15,359,228
$12,312,935
$1,268,930
$1,005,265
$1,005,265
With the substantial completion of Phase 2 in January of 2007, the City is ready to move on to
Phase 3. This phase includes the renovation of the former police department, the demolition of
the Community Development Building and the Legislative Office Building and the construction
of additional parking and landscaped areas. Housed on the first floor of the renovated building
will be the Human Resources Department, CommWlity Development Department, Recreation
Department, a portion of the Building and Planning Department and the Chula Vista Employees
Credit Union. The basement will be home to the Information Technology Services Department
(ITS), a large conference/training room, additional conference rooms, storage areas, gym and
locker room and an Wl-programmed area that will be "roughed in". This un-programmed area
will be able to be easily finished if the City finds the need to use that space in the future.
From an architectural perspective, the building will be renovated on the exterior to complement
the architecture of the new City Hall and renovated PSB. The. elevation facing the PSB will
contain the same tower and archway elements that will complete the new public open space area
in the center of the complex. The existing exterior walls of the building will be modified to
provide windows similar to City Hall and PSB.
The interior of the building will also be significantly modified. The main feature of the interior
of the building will be a 36 foot by 36 foot "atrium" in the center of the building. Above the
atrium, there is an existing clearstory, thus natural light will be able to penetrate all the way into
the basement of the building. Public access to the building will be switched from the side of the
building facing Fourth A venue to the building elevation facing City Hall.
Pro/eet Schedule
The design build agreement between the City and HPI called for a start date of February 19,
2007 and substantial completion by May 7, 2008 for Phase 3. Substantial completion means that
the building is operational and open for business. Final completion is called for by August 6,
2008. By the final completion date, the Community Development and Legislative Office
buildings will have been removed and the parking and landscape areas will be complete. It is
both staff and HPI's goal to deliver the project on schedule. It should be noted, however, that the
schedule for the completion of Phase 2 was about five weeks later than originally planned. This
was principally caused by two major factors, the presence of unsuitable soils beneath the area
where the former Council Chambers were located and the need to Wldertake a greater effort in
renovating the roof of the building. These slight delays trickle through the project into the third
phase. In an effort to recover as much time as possible, some work in the basement of the former
police department was started in January of2007. The purpose of this work was to provide some
areas for the ITS Department to relocate equipment. ,V "'" ~
Proiect Fundinz
2/20/07, Item~
Page 4 of 7
As briefly discussed above, the project has proceeded within the budgeted amounts approved by
Council on August 3, 2004. It is staffs belief that upon completion of Phase 3, the project will
have been delivered within the budget that was approved. Table 2 below provides a brief
summary of the budget status of all three phases. .
Table 2.
City Hall
Public Services Building
Former Police Facility
$22,776,000
$12,357,000
$15,015,000
$22,233,610
$12,807,465
$15,015,000
$542,390
($450,465)
$0
With respect to Phase 2, we are confident that we will receive credits on our insurance costs.
While the amount and timing of these credits are unknown as of this date, any credit will reduce
the overage depicted above. We also expect to receive rebates from San Diego Gas and Electric
for the 30kwH photovoltaic system installed on the roof of the PSB.
As described earlier, the City has already financed a portion of Phase 3 of the project with the
financing of Phase 2. Also, as discussed above, the City has already incurred some costs for Phase
3. Table 3 below provides a breakdown and the amounts and in which phase the early Phase 3
expenditures occurred.
Table 3.
Description
Design Builder Costs:
Design of Building
Design of Temp. Renov.
Development Staff Costs
D/B Fixed Fee (Design)
D/B Fixed Fee (Construction)
Construction Allowances
Demolition and Construction
D/B Costs Sub-Total
City Budgeted Allowances:
Project Insurance:
1m1t. Incurred in
. Phase 1 for Phase 3
AmI. Incurred in
Phase 2 for Phase 3
Total Amount
. Incurred in Prior
Phases
$785,000
$10,000
$83,000
$166,000
$785,000
$10,000
$83,000
$166,000
$41,175
$27,015
$202,212
$1,314,402
$167,854
$973,726
/tJ- f
$155,201
$1,199,201
$76,369
$898,726
$2,1:74,296
$41,175
$27,015
$47,011
$115,201
$91,485
$75,000
$281,686
2/20/07, Item~
Page 5 of7
In terms of how Phase 3 will actually be paid for, the plan for that has changed since the beginning
of the project. Originally, the City planned to finance all three phases of the project. During the
course of 2006, the City entered into negotiations with the development community with respect to
the updating of the PFDIF. The development community was very desirous of seeing the City not
finance Phase 3. The eventual update of the PFDIF that the City Council approved in November of
2006 contemplated the City paying for Phase 3 as it went, i.e. not financing it. Based on the
November 2006 PFDIF update, Phase 3 of the Civic Center will be funded as follows:
PFDIF - 88.87% of construction and 79.27% of financing (portion financed with Phase 2)
General Fund - 11.13% of construction and 20.73% of fmancing.
Given that the total cost of Phase 3 has been approved at $15,015,000, that means that the PFDIF
share of the Phase is $13,343,830 and General Fund share is $1,671,170. As described above, some
Phase 3 costs have already occurred and a portion of the Phase 2 financing reimbursed the City for
those costs. Table 4 below summarizes the amount necessary to fully fund and complete the
proj ect.
As Table 4 below indicates, the remaining funds needed to complete Phase 3 is $12,586,744. Of the
amount, $1,005,268 of Phase 2 bond proceeds are available for Phase 3. This then requires an
additional appropriation of $11,581,476. Staff recommends appropriating the remaining PFDIF
share now. The general fund's share of this amount will be $1,337,031. Since the draw-down
schedule contemplates drawing the funds at a rate of 8.3% of the project monthly, the general fund
share will not be needed until the final 1.5 months of the project. With a final completion date of
August 6, 2008 as discussed above, the general fund component will not be required until late in
Fiscal Year 2008 or early in Fiscal Year 2009. It is anticipated that the General Fund's share will be
derived from an intemalloan from the PFDIF paid back over 20 years at an interest rate of 5%.
This type of repayment schedule would require an annual General Fund appropriation of
approximately $135,000 starting in FY 2009. This loan will be addressed during the Fiscal Year
2008 Budget process.
Table 4.
Adjusted Phase 3
. Budget
Design Builder Costs
City Budgeted Allowances
Project Insurance
$11,057,000
$3,012,000
$946,000
$1,314,402
$167,854
$973,726
$9,742,598
$2,844,146
o
Since the project was started, there have been some changes to the uses of buildings. The main
change was the decision to have the Community Development Department housed in the former
police department instead of in the PSB as originally planned. In order to make that change work -'
from a space perspective, the original plan to have a portion of the Engineering Department located / cP --!:J
2/20/07, Item~
Page 6 of7
in the former police department was changed and the entire Engineering Department is now located
in the PSB. This change occurred in early 2006 after a reorganization of the Engineering
Department. This change enabled the Community Development Department to have additional
space that it would need and also allow the Engineering Department to be kept together in the PSB.
This change has had a number of impacts on the project. First, some redesign of the interior space
plan was necessary in Phase 2 to eliminate Community Development and enlarge Engineering.
Similar redesign will occur in Phase 3. The more significant issue from a cost and logistic
perspective is that the General Services Department never anticipated having to find an alternate
location for Community Development. The plan in terms of interim moves of staff within the
complex was that the Human Resources Department would occupy the Community Development
Building and Legislative Office Building during Phase 3 construction. Those buildings would have
been vacated by the Community Development Department as they moved into the PSB. That was
the original plan.
With the change of plans, we needed to find a place to house both Community Development and
Human Resources during Phase 3. A number of options were explored including; leasing office
space off-site, utilizing the old public works center at F St. and Woodlawn Ave., scattering staff
throughout a number of areas or leasing portable office space. Based on cost, minimizing public
inconvenience and maintaining departmental efficiencies, it was determined that the best way to go
was to lease portable office space and place those facilities in the rear of the Ken Lee parking lot. It
was further determined that it would be better to relocate Community Development to that space
even though it required an additional move. The reason for this is' that Human Resources handles
significantly more public traffic than Community Development and the Community Development
Building already had a counter/public waiting area as well as public parking innnediately in front of
the building. We expect the cost of this effort to be approximately $205,000 ($45,000 for
construction and $160,000 for lease ($ I O,OOO/month). It is our goal at this point in time to not
modify the project budget for Phase 3, however, given how tight the budget on Phase 2 was, it
would not be terribly surprising if a minor budget adjustment may be necessary.
DECISION MAKER CONFLICTS
Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council and has found a conflict exists, in
that Councilmember Jerry Rindone has holdings within 500 feet of the boundaries of the
property which is the subject of this action.
FISCAL IMPACT
The fiscal impact of the proj ect is as described above in the discussion regarding the split in the
costs of the project between the PFDIF and General Fund. As discussed above the general fund
share of Phase 3 will not be needed until late in Fiscal Year 2008. Staff is recommending
appropriating the full share of the PFDIF obligation at this time. It is anticipated that the General
Fund's share will be derived from an internal loan from the PFDIF paid back over 20 years at an
interest rate of 5% (approximately $135,000 annually beginning in FY09) and will be addressed
during the FY 2008 budget process.
The projected Fiscal Year 2007 fund balance of the PFDIF is $15.8 million. This amount is
sufficient to pay the costs of Phase 3 of the Civic Center as well as meet the PFDIF's existing
debt service obligations. At the end of the project there will be a remaining fund balance of $5.1
million.
/o-~
2/20/07, Item~
Page 7 of 7
From an operational standpoint, the building will include new mechanical equipment that will be
significantly more energy efficient than the existing equipment. Also, the City is participating in
the Savings By Design program with SDG&E and is attempting to comply with the City's
energy conservation policy of exceeding California Title 24 standards by 20%.
From a maintenance and custodial perspective, once the building is complete, and the
Community Development and Legislative Office Building are removed, General Services will
attempt to analyze the demands the new building will create on those functions. It should be
noted that during the entire Civic Center proj ect, custodial and building maintenance staff levels
have remained static since one building has been out of service the entire time. Obviously, this
will not be case at the conclusion of Phase 3. Given the shifting square footages and elimination
of the two smaller, less efficient buildings, its difficult to assess what the actual demands will be
until we are actually in the remodeled building and observe how the buildings operate as a
complex. One lesson that we have leamed is that there is significantly higher demand for the use
of our buildings from outside the City given their usability, audio-visual capabilities, comfort
and attractiveness.
From the perspective of other departments in the complex there should not be any fiscal impact
as their staffing levels are not materially impacted. It is hoped, that given the new equipment,
shared counter spaces and more logical placing of departments that there will be increased
efficiencies among the departments in the complex. Whether those efficiencies will be able to be
quantified in terms of cost savings is something that those resident departments will have to
analyze once they've had sufficient time to become accustomed to the finished complex.
Prepared by: Jack Griffin, Director afGeneral Services
Maria Kachadoorian, Director of Finance
M:\General Services\GS Administration\Council Agenda\Civic Center\Phase III GO 300\Civic Center Phase 3 fina1.doc
/~-7
RESOLUTION 2007 -
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA APPROPRIATING FUNDS FROM
THE PUBLIC FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT
FEE FUND FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF PHASE 3
OF THE CIVIC CENTER RENOVATION PROJECT
(GG-300)
WHEREAS, on August 3, 2004, the City Council approved the Guaranteed
Maximum Price ("GMP") of the project at $38,346,000; and
WHEREAS, the total project budget approved by City Council on August 3, 2004
was $50,148,000; and
WHEREAS, this action appropriates the funds to construct the third and final
phase of the project in accordance with those previous City Council actions; and
WHEREAS, Phase 3 of the project includes the renovation of the former police
department building, the demolition of the Legislative Office Building and the Community
Development Building and the construction of the additional parking and landscaped areas; and
WHEREAS, the project has been approved under a Mitigated Negative
Declaration, IS-04-013; and
WHEREAS, with the substantial completion of Phase 2 in January of 2007, the
City is ready to move on to Phase 3; and
WHEREAS, the design build agreement between the City and HPI called for a
start date of February 19, 2007 and substantial completion by May 7, 2008 for Phase 3.
Substantial completion means that the building is operational and open for business. Final
completion is called for by August 6, 2008; and
WHEREAS, originally, the City planned to finance all three phases of the project
but as a result of the 2006, PFDlF update the City decide not to finance the third phase of the
project; and
WHEREAS, based on the November 2006 PFDlF update, Phase 3 of the Civic
Center will be funded as follows:
PFDlF - 88.87% of construction and 79.27% of financing (portion financed with Phase 2)
General Fund - 11.13% of construction and 20.73% of financing.
,7
/O~6
WHEREAS, given that the total cost of Phase 3 has been approved at $15,015,000,
that means that the PFDIF share of the Phase is $13,343,830 and General Fund share is $1,671,170;
and
WHEREAS, the remaining funds needed to complete Phase 3 is $12,586,744; and
WHEREAS, of the amount above, $1,005,268 of Phase 2 bond proceeds are
available for Phase 3. This then requires an additional appropriation of $11,581 ,476; and
WHEREAS, staff recommends appropriating the remaining PFDIF share now; and
WHEREAS, the General Fund's share of this amount will be $1,337,031, the
appropriation of which will be requested when the funds are needed; and
WHEREAS, it is anticipated that the General Fund's share will be derived from an
intemalloan from the PFDIF paid back over 20 years at an interest rate of 5% (approximately
$135,000 annually beginning in FY09); and
WHEREAS, the projected Fiscal Year 2007 fund balance of the PFDIF is $15.8
million. This amount is sufficient to pay the costs of Phase 3 of the Civic Center as well as meet
the PFDIF's existing debt service obligations; and
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista does hereby appropriate funds in the amount of $11,581,476 from the Public Facilities
Development Impact Fee fund for the construction of Phase 3 of the Civic Center Renovation
Project (GG-300).
Presented by
Approved as to form by
-
2:L, dJ v(/'L tLJ~'-epu1 jjc.d~C.....
Ann MoJe
City Attorney
Jack Griffin
Director of General Services
/0--9
Port of San Diego Commissioners
c/o Environmental Hea]th Coalition
40 I Mile of Cars Way, Suite 3 10
National City, CA 9]950
Dear Port Commissioners,
The existing South Bay
Power Plant is an inefficient and out-
dated facility that has been polluting
western Chula Vista since the 1960s.
There are thousands of people and
numerous schools in the area imme-
diately downwind of the power plant.
RECEIVED APR 261006
2tZ.C / ()"f-
b-D1\ckd: +v st-Dff.
b" E't4-C R€p- ~
[d-. So.~ FO.,).ey--
1>tar.-i--
~ J. gl\Je<)~
~+t>t-I-.~ UW
I understand that negotiations
are currently underway to decide the
future of the South Bay Power Plant.
I strongly nrge the Port Commis-
sioners to develop an energy re-
placement strategy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polluting
power plant near the same place.
This is an opportunity to prevent decades of pollution and pursue a clean energy future. Please don't
make another 50 year mistake.
Commissioners, please:
Develop an energy replacement strategy with input &om the City and the public.
Adopt an energy strategy that relies on development of clean, renewable energy and conservation
If a small replacement power plant is needed, it should be air cooled and air pollution impacts should not
threaten neighboring residents or schools.
Sincerely,
':::~A~. S:,"~~~ Z;p "'0,
""Phonebl., ~1.2. lC2. ~ . Email Th"........."oEV' e j.,.+........~l. 0::0......
~ give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact:
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 40] Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950.
Sr. Comisionado Geesman:
La actual Planta Energetica de la Bahia Sur es una instalacion ineficiente y
anticuada que ha estado contaminando el oeste de Chula Vista desde los 1960's.
Apoyo que se quite del Frente de la Bahia. Sin embargo, el nuevo propuesto
proyecto busca ser aprobada para una cantidad comparable de contaminacion.
iQueremos aire mas limpio en el futuro, no el estatus quo! Esta es nuestra (mica
oportunidad para prevenir decadas futuras de contaminacion y bus car un futuro
energetico limpio.
Por favor no corneta otro error de 50 afios.
Exhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que:
. Rechace In propuesta para una planta con "conductos de combustion" de 620MW
. Rechace cualquier opci6n que no reduzca la contaminacion a comunidades en direccion del viento
. Requiera energia limpia y renovable ademas 13 conservaci6n como pw1e del proyecto
Atentarnente, ;::' i' -,-l, ' [)
Nomb,e i ~lL co' \& S SUII1.C<-
Domicilio '7:, (:) Co \0 r Cfi Jo~u e J3
Ciudad (\At U I u tJ,' stq Estado ill..- C6digo Postal Cf \ C( l (
Teletono &>\ <r) '-( 7- 0, 3Z!.C{;orreo Electr6nico
Autorizo que se utilice roi nombre cn publico en apoyo de la postura antclioL Para mas informacion, comu-
mquese con Coalicion de Salud Ambiental (619) 474w0220, 401 Mile of Can. Way, Suite 3IO, National City,
~.~.~~~
----..--
Sr. Comisionado Geesman:
La actual Planta Energetica de la Bahia Sur es una instalacion ineficiente y
anticuada que ha estado contaminando el oeste de Chula Vista desde los 1960' s.
Apoyo que se quite del Frente de la Bahia. Sin embargo, ei nuevo propuesto
proyecto busca ser aprobada para una cantidad comparable de contaminacion.
iQueremos aire mas limpio en el futuro, no el estatus quo! Esta es nuestra (mica
oportunidad para prevenir decadas futuras de contarninacion y buscar un futuro
energetico limpio.
Por favor no corneta otro error de 50 afios.
Exhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que:
. Rec.hace la propuesta para una planta con "conductos de combustion" de 620MW
. Rechace cualquier opci6n que no reduzca la contaminacion a comunidades en direcci6n del viento
. ReqUJera energia limpia y renovable ademas la conservaci6n como parte del proyecto.
Atentamente, 4" J ~ ~
Nombre L/.....;,-(/{ v I! c L ~~ /? PZ /? /'" ~-
Domicilio 10(4 (JJCrvdl.Clw VI -Ave
Ciudad ChvltJ Vlsk Estado~ C6digo Postal
Teletono 0 y/~ / t ~I 7 Correo Electr6nico
Autorizo que se utihce mi nombre en publico en apoyo de la postura anterior. Para mas informaci6n, comu-
niquese con Coalici6n de Salud Ambiental (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City,
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval from the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval1
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This IS our only opportunity to prevent future decades 0
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don '/ make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution'on '"
downwind communities. ('1:
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely, t;,> -;--- ~ L
Name '414 U$4 /--c......
Address ~oz t ~~)OO~U t.()A/ ~
City (/2u'/- w.r- State Q, Zip 7 N / /
Phone 6/,;' ') V-!/~Ernai1 CR,I5T!fIi4b,3lbQSbC.'iI..()
'.3 J
I give permission to use my name III public 10 support the above position. For more information contact .
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, Nationa] City, CA 91950
- ---_.._..~----~-~----
----------
Sr. Comisionado Geesman: .
La actual Planta Energetica de la Bahia Sur es una instalacion ineficiente y
anticuada que ha estado contaminando el oeste de Chula Vista desde ios 1960's.
Apoyo que se quite del Frentede la Bahia. Sin embargo, el nuevo propuesto
proyecto busca ser aprobada para una cantidad comparable de contaminacion.
i Queremos aire mas limpio en el futuro, no el estatus quo! Esta es nuestra (mica
oportunidad para prevenir decadas futuras de contaminacion y buscar un futuro
energetico limpio. ~
Por favor no corneta otro error de 50 afios.
Exhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que:
. Rechace la propuesta para una planta con "conductos de combustion" de 620MW
. Rechace cualquier opci6n que no reduzca la contaminaci6n a comunidades en direccion del viento
. Requlera energi::\ Y renovab~e [::aCion como parte del proyecto,
1.9-'''' 0... U
Ciudad U 8. Estado C6digo Postal c.... \ a., \ \
Telefonl{1 \)( \~\'j$-~orreo Electr6nico
Autonz~ue se uti lice mi nombre en publico en apoyo de]a postura anterior. Para mas informaci6n, cornu.
niquese con Coalici6n de Salud Ambienta] (619) 474.0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way. Suite 310, National City,
;,_r_,.",
,t~~
_. ~. ~~n
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval from the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 650MW duct-flTed power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely,
Name 51.). \\1\CA\'0-W
Address i 0 1 \ Cnlo,,-acln Ave -Q1J..e_
City('\-V'v.. \r,',>"rtA State (tPrZip 41'11\
Phone Lf::>I.J<\-5i> Email :?yl'AiA -"WQ.vlcJ""C3
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950.
.tt ~...
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval from the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don '{ make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-flTed power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely, 0 /
Name I t/ fJ L q i./ j /V'
- vr:7
Address D 0 '1 w (> co d. / "- W N
City c k.A c~ VI,-Ie... State C,,- Zip
Phon(.~/7)1U <cU Email
tt1~
o...vt'
'IN//
r give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval from the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to : V
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal r'1
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
;~t~
1 give permission to use my name in-public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalit1On (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile ofCaf5 Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support Its re-
moval from the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not'the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of ~
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-flTed power plant proposal .
. Reject any options that ~oes not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely, j~ 0
Name ~LG1 Cre Y\o{1
Address . "'15 I Ocd.vL~v'\ ()rvQ.,
City 12. II . State C"" Zip c\ \'\ I ~
Phone 19\C\. ~f-t..lfio-Email shA"'100'^"'''''' @ ~ot.~.~
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more mformatio~ contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474~0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, SUite 310, Natlonal City, CA 91950
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval from the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don 'I make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620Mw duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
5~~::IY, ~C: ('. Ve,
Address 'V ~~~~k~-f=
City0h\AIO\ ~ 5tateC.,LL Zip l"1f l
Phone Email
I give permission to use my name in public to SUpp011 the above position. For more information contact
Environmental HeaJth Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950
Sr. Comisionado Geesman:
La actual Planta Energetica de la Bahia Sur es una instalaci6n ineficiente y
anticuada que ha estado contaminando el oeste de Chula Vista desde los 1960's.
Apoyo que se quite del Frente de la Bahia. Sin embargo, el nuevo propuesto
proyecto busca ser aprobada para una cantidad comparable de contaminaci6n.
iQueremos aire mas limpio en el futuro, no e1 estatus quo! Esta es nuestra (mica
oportunidad para prevenir decadas futuras de contaminaci6n y bus car un futuro
energetico limpio.
POl' favor no cornela 011'0 error de 50 anos.
Exhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que:
. Rechace la propuesta para una planta con "conductos de combustion" de 620MW
. Rechace cualquier opcian que no reduzc.a ]a contaminaci6n a comunidades en direcclon del"V!:ento
. Requiem energia limpia y renovable ademas la conservacion como parte de] proyecto
{/
-
Atentamente,,-;> \- r: ' j
Nombre "\ a.. r~C'7C\ p,,{IO..yt' F'S
Donucilio <t.~~ ~ ~ )"c-\ tC'l rt I f't Au? ,
ciuda5~t ~ n U ~ '3 E,wdo.c1L C6digo Postal 919//
Tel8l0no e,)1 zsSn lbcorreo Electr6nico
,~,~t,~.
Autorizo que se utilice- rni nombre en publico en apoyo de]a postura anterior. Para mas informacion, cornu-
niquese con Coalicion de Salud Ambiental (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City,
~. ~.. -~-
~
~
'ear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
.at has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
10Val from the Bayrront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
) emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
:>t the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
:>lIution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don 'I make anolher 50 year mistake.
strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewal:>le energy and conservation as part of
the project.
incerel y,
Name
',e- ~\\u,~
Addre s (p ~
City . State (1 Zip~
Phone4"* 31 \ '7 Email r j\i\ \ ~f)<:::(::) \ Wi> \'\ ,0J "'-
I give permis~on to use my name In public to support the above positIOn. For more mtormatlOn contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950.
---
---_..----
lear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
mt has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
IOval from the Bayrront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
) emit a comparable amount of pollntion. We want cleaner air in the future,
ot the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
ollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make anolher 50 year mislake.
strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
inCerelY,~ .'
Name ~
Addr~ 5'.f2t ?fii.f
City J'.0l$. State (J.L}-Zip 11 lID
Phone19t~ .t2.DrnOEmail~~e.co~l.)e..r
I give- permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval from the Bayrront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don 'I make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW quct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities. .
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely, ' II c.V
Name ~ec~e... s;;.-ti rMPI-V'I J f2c~
Address _ 0 IV\ (') A-~s.. ~e
City ~ V~... f.o... State CPr Zip q I q I 6
Phone bV) ~~/H)i-I t, Email qeorf3les <:B (,O)(,ne.R
I give permisgion to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474.0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 919
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and .outdated facilit:
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re
moval from the Bayrront. However, the new proposed project seeks appro V!
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the futu/(
not 'the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades c
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don 'I make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal .
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollutIOn on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely,
Name f.0N"
Address 2 <j (]
City C. 1(
Phone(~ 1'1)<-1.2 7
"7 ''''''' (',r I,;
,-S !, 130; +e 0,J.- ,
Statel.A Zip g}1 in
/..0 g Emaile<.()~.2I.iP.s&J(JJvb!)).f.J e'r'
1 give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. F~r more information contact
Pnvirnnmp,nfal Health Coalition (619'1474-0220. 401 Mile of Cars Way, SUIte 310, National City, CA 91950.
Sr. Comisionado Geesman:
La actual Planta Energetica de la Bahia Sur es una instalaci6n ineficiente y
anticuada que ha estado contaminando el oeste de Chula Vista desde los 1960's.
Apoyo que se quite del Frente de la Bahia. Sin embargo, el nuevo propuesto
proyecto busca ser aprobada para una cantidad comparable de contaminaci6n.
i Queremos aire mas limpio en el futuro, no el estatus quo! Esta es nuestra {mica
oportunidad para prevenir decadas futuras de contaminaci6n y bus car un futuro
energetico limpio.
Par favor no cornela olro error de 50 anos.
Exhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que:
. Rechace !a propuesta para una planta con "conductos de combustion" de 620MW
. Rechace cualquier opci6n que no reduzc.a la contammaci6n a comunidades en direccion del viento
. Requiem energia limpia y renovable ademas la conservaci6n como parte del proyecto
/L
C6digo postal!); f/J
Telefono Correa Electr6nico )
Autorizo que se utilice mi nombre en publico en apoyo de la postura antenor. Para mas mformaclon, cornu-
niquese con CoahcJon de Salud Ambiental (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Slute 310, NatlOoaJ City,
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval ITom the BaYITont. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly' urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fIred power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
S~::IY, L IIcII/eo j{ Ocklj
Address / (J f / nak/awYi Av f.
City(JwlillJ/fCJc State(4 ZipCJ/tr/ /
Phone Email J
I give permIssion to use my name in public to support the above position. For more info.rmation contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile or Cars Way, SUite 310, NatIOnal City, CA 91950.
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval ITom the BaYITont. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparahle amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely, r \
Name SQ,(,I.\~'"' \.noY12c. 'L7~
Address
CityC)A, ~t., \ )~\c, State CPA. Zip q \C\ \\
PhoneQEl() .-gt\S:;L Email
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more informatIOn contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474.0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 9195C
____m_________
------
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. 1 support its re-
moval ITom the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don 'I make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely,
Name_I'-\.u..'f~'" t\J",'\Jt.~~O
Address i\O() -:LV\c1.)"\f\<:..\ i2,)"J 'U'6()
City('h.~ \h~.. StaterA Zip 41q\\
Phone Email
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, Nationa] City, CA 91950 ~
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval from the BaYITont. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please dDn 't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind conununities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely,
Name
Address
City
Phone \.j 7t) -3677
r.
State 0A
Email
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact /'
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile or Cars Way, SUite 310, NatIOnal City, CA 91950/
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval ITom the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution, We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo I This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future,
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-f11'ed power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind conununities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
S~::ly,\Z r~~ efJ;j/~
Addre~~ 'if:; 10(/", Jt; g'
CityJ""'fn/ql Bet/ll. StateC4- Zip QII6:J.
Phone@/lf) (J.,(}"7-o 6t'bEmai1
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact J
EnVIronmental Health Coalition (619) 474.0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310. National CIty, CA 91950
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval ITom the BaYITont. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future,
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-f11'ed power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind conununities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely, .~~.~ d
Name /.:jP- /av '^-',<J :../C"1:$z
Address ; {J 3 ().4 f: (4. u' ~p
City e Av. ,t StateC A Zip 9'1'//(
Phone i-J,;l6 7~ J..(" Email
I give permission to use my name In public to support the above position. For more information contact J
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile ofCam Way, Suite 310, NatIOnal City, CA 91950
~_.'__m.___~~___"__ ____.____.__.
Sr. Comisionado Geesman:
La actual Planta Energetica de la Bahia Sur es una instalaci6n ineficiente y
anticuada que ha estado contaminando el oeste de Chula Vista desde los 1960's.
Apoyo que se quite del Frente de la Bahia. Sin embargo, el nuevo propuesto
proyecto busca ser aprobada para una cantidad comparable de contaminaci6n,
i Queremos aire mas limpio en el futuro, no el estatus quo! Esta es nuestra tinica
oportunidad para prevenir decadas futuras de contaminaci6n y buscar un futuro
energetico limpio.
Por jffilor no cornela olro error de 50 ailos.
Exhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que:
. Rechace la propuesta para una planta con "conductos de combustion" de 620MW
. Rechace cualquier opcion que no reduzca la contaminaci6n a comunidades en direcci6n del viento
. Requiera energia limpia y renovable ademas la conservacion como parte del proyecto
Atentamente, ..."'7 . ~ r. /
Nombre Qr-tM.C^ v- r (V Ni ",f?)Jz. 6-
Domidlio 10 ~ 0 0 C1 IOw,-'/) a~
Ciudad C,,"v ltA ""5\[..< Estado~ Codigo Postal q/q II
Telefono L/ 2 (. . 1 if Z (:;> Correa Electronico
Autorizo que se utllice mi nombre en publico en apoyo de Ja postura anterior. Para mas informacion, comu-
niquese con CoaJici6n de Salud Ambiental (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 3 10, National City,
j
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. 1 support its re.
moval from the Bayfront However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable arnount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind conununities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely, //-::::::Z-: ,/
Name .;;::"/f'l6/ ~Y/f#d?Z:;
Address /tJ.lU tJllkLIIIJ//J I/f/t'
City Ctv.<&. tI.'nifr State CI1 Zip 11CfI/
Phone _4 '2&,- "'I q? (0 Ernail
fb~~..
,
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950 j
Sr. Comisionado Geesman:
La actual Planta Energetica de la Bahia Sur es una instalaci6n ineficiente y
anticuada que ha estado contaminando el oeste de Chula Vista desde los 1960's.
Apoyo que se quite del Frente de la Bahia. Sin embargo, el nuevo propuesto
proyecto busca ser aprobada para una cantidad comparable de contaminaci6n.
jQueremos aire mas limpio en el futuro, no el estatus quo! Esta es nuestra unica
oportunidad para prevenir decadas futuras de contaminaci6n y buscar un futuro
energetico limpio.
Por favor no cometa otro error de 50 anos.
Exhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que:
. Rechace la propuesta para una planta con "conductos de combusti6n" de 620MW
. Reehace cualquier opcj6n que no rectuzca la oontaminaci6n a comunidades en direcci6n de! viento
. Requiera energia limpia y renovab]e f.ldemas la conservaci6n como parte del proyecto
Atentament~ C ~
Nombre e r (" 5 A Fe rV\.o, Vj 4(' 2-
DomiciIio to.3 0 () A. K jq (,) 10 j<( () C
Ciudad ~h " if Estado.fJ.J!L C6digo Postal tf(9((
Teletono ti lb?f d 0
Correa ElectronlCO
Autorizo que se utilice mi nombre en publico en apoyo de la postura anterior. Para mas informaci6n, cornu- . \ if
mquese con Coalici6n de Salud AmbJental (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, v::.r
~. ~. ~-~
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re.
moval ITom the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 yeaI' mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct.fIred power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind conununities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project
r give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950~
--.- ~--_._---- -- .----.------..--. -----
Sr. Comisionado Geesman:
La actual Planta Energetica de la Bahia Sur es una instalaci6n inefIciente y
anticuada que ha estado contaminando el oeste de Chula Vista desde los 1960's.
Apoyo que se quite del Frente de la Bahia. Sin embargo, el nuevo propuesto
proyecto busca ser aprobada para una cantidad comparable de contaminaci6n.
j Queremos aire mas limpio en el futuro, no el estatus quo! Esta es nuestra unica
oportunidad para prevenir decadas futuras de contaminaci6n y buscar un futuro
energetico limpio.
Par favor no cornela olro error de 50 anos.
Exhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que:
. Rechace ]a pl'Opuesta para una planta con "conductos de combustion" de 620MW
. Rechace cualquier opci6n que no reduzca la contaminaci6n a comunidades en direccion de! viento
. Requiera energia limpia y renovable ademas la conservaci6n como parte del proyecto
. I
Atentamente, I I' S ~ 1 ^ -
Nombre L..-VI, \Q , IV ~Il^ 107
Dorrun1.o \ O~ Jf. f(' €.- q Ov'\ f\J-.e.
Cmdad ~ \. Estado C;/2s- C6dlgo Postal ~ (
Telefono ,::;~<;- 4<;:'20 correOEleCtr6niCO~
J
Autorizo que se utilice mi nombre en publico en apoyo de ]a postura anterior. Para mas informaci6n, comu-
niquese con Coalici6n de Salud Ambiental (619) 474-0220, 40] Mile of Cars WaY. Suite 31 0 N-'ltinn!J! ritv
Sr. Comisionado Geesman:
La actual Planta Energetica de la Bahia Sur es una instalaci6n ineficiente y
anticuada que ha estado contaminando el oeste de Chula Vista desde los 1960's.
Apoyo que se quite del Frente de la Bahia. Sin embargo, el nuevo propuesto
proyecto busca ser aprobada para una cantidad comparable de contaminaci6n.
i Queremos aire mas limpio en el futuro, no el estatus quo! Esta es nuestra (mica
oportunidad para prevenir decadas futuras de contaminaci6n y buscar un futuro
energetico limpio.
Por favor no cometa otro error de 50 afios.
Exhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que:
. Rechace 1a propuesta para una planta con "conductos de combustion" de 620MW
. Rechace cualquier opei6n que no reduzca la contammaci6n a comunidades en direcci6n del viento
. Requiera energia limpia y renovable ademas la conservaci6n como parte dcl proyecto
,t~ ........
.;J".~
Atentarnente,
Nombre
Domicilio P'1-- LIt .
Ciudad ',,- I '.. '. Estado (~tL. C6digo Postal '7/ '7 J /
Telefono (~) /1) 1}'J/. / 10 korreo Electr6nico
./
Autorizo que se utilice mi nombre en publico cn apaya de !a postura antenor. Para mas informacion, comu- /
niquese con Coalici6n de Salud Ambiental (619) 474-0210, 401 Mile or Can; Way, Suite 310, National City,
CA 91950
-_._~-_._.....-
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power PI ant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. 1 support its re-
moval. from the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fIred power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit signifIcantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely, . n
Name ~ ll1.rMlf\.CL
Address \OC\~nc\\'--lfl
City~t~~ State Cll\- Zip t1\c\\\
Phon ~\_~=L-) Emml
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact j
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950
Sr. Comisionado Geesman:
La actual Planta Energetica de la Bahia Sur es una instalaci6n inefIciente y
anticuada que ha estado contaminando el oeste de Chuia Vista desde los 1960's.
Apoyo que se quite del Frente de la Bahia. Sin embargo, el nuevo propuesto
proyecto busca ser aprobada para \lna cantidad comparable de contaminaci6n.
i Queremos aire mas limpio en el futuro, no el estatus quo! Esta es nuestra (mica
oportunidad para prevenir decadas futuras de contaminaci6n y buscar un futuro
energetico limpio.
Por favor no cometa otro error de 50 afios.
Exhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que:
. Rechace !a propuesta para una planta con "conductos de combustion" de 620MW
. Rechace cualquier opcion que no reduzca la contammaci6n a comunidades en direcci6n del ~viento .
. Requiem energia limpia y renovable ademas la conservaci6n como parte del proyecto
Domkilio
Atentamente,
Nombre
Ciudad . ~ Estado~ C6digo Postal '1/5Y/
Telefono (-r? j <;!pr-Vp\( Correa Electr6nico
! .
Autorizo que se uti lice mi nombre en publico en apoyo de la postura anterior. Para mas informacion, cornu- r
niquese con Coahcion de Salud Amhiental (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, V
~. _. -~-
-------------
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s" I support its re-
moval from the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fIred power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit signifIcantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
s:'y, ~~ ~~(;f
Address . <if.< 'GO,,\ . )
cityClA.- , State LA Zip ~ I L
Phone t{~~-g2.I{) Emaili;
1 give permission to use my, ~ame in public to support th: above position. F~r more information contact fj
Environmental Health CoaJltlon (619) 4 74~0220, 401 Mile of CaTs Way, SUite 310, National CIty, CA 91950.
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval rrom the Bayrront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely,," -TP
Name lYlflAMtA../ tt, 7YUA/? ~
Address ID7.J U~L~/
City('Jn, . be. _ l;;:Le- State C{). , Zip '1\ q t\
Phone Email
j
I give permission to lIse my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
EnvironmentaJ Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 3lO, National City, CA 91950
------'-.----
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval rrom the Bayrront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
'::'':'Y~ ~ ~ .
Address ~ l I-,) 1:\ ~ ",
Cit~V\J ' . Sta\ ('q Zi~ \~ _
Phonel\?"Y CQ S \ Email QM \j'2.-..-:...~';:L 'S 'oc.. qt' I\~T
\ J
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental HeaJth Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950 II
tt~
Sr. Comisionado Geesman:
La actual Planta Energetica de la Bahia Sur es una instalacion ineficiente y
anticuada que ha estado contarninando el oeste de Chula Vista desde los 1960' s.
Apoyo que se quite del Frente de la Bahia. Sin embargo, el nuevo propuesto
proyecto busca ser aprobada para \!Ila cantidad comparable de contaminaci6n.
i Queremos aire mas limpio en el futuro, no el estatus quo! Esta es nuestra (mica
oportunidad para prevenir decadas futuras de contaminacion y buscar un futuro
energetico limpio.
POI' favor no cornela 011'0 error de 50 anos.
Exhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que:
. Rechace la propuesta para una planta con "condudos de combustion" de 620MW
. Rechace cualquier opcion que no reduzca Ja contaminacion a comunidades en direc.cion del 'VJento
. Requiera energia limpia y renovable ademas la conservacion wmo parte del proyecto
Atentamente,
Nombre
D ()/l1ff~< /\ ~~'"'~
Domicilio '\ () \ '? 'W () (') A \,,,,,, /,,, rJ..~
ClUdad C ~\.v J~~S\adO~ C6dlgo Postal ql0 \
TelEo&-lq \/r:t( -o',,}le(>rreo Electr6n1co
AutOflZO que se utiJlce mt nombre en publico en apoyo de la postura antenor Para mas mformaclon, comu-
niCJuese con Coalicion de Salud Ambiental (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City,rJ
CA 91950
--.--- ,.,--.-.--------
------.' ,----
Sr. Comisionado Geesman:
La actual Planta Energetica de la Bahia Sur es una instalaci6n ineficiente y
anticuadaque haestado contaminando el oeste de Chula Vista desde los 1960's.
Apoyo que se quite del Frente de la Bahia. Sin embargo, el nuevo propuesto
proyecto busca ser aprobada para una cantidad comparable de contaminaci6n.
i Queremos aire mas limpio en el futuro, no el estatus quo! Esta es nuestra unica
oportunidad para prevenir decadas futuras de contaminaci6n y buscar un futuro
energetico limpio.
Por favor no cornela otro error de 50 anos.
Exhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que:
. Rechace la propuesta para una planta con "conductos de combustion" de 620MW
. Rechace cualquier opdon que no reduzca la contaminacion a comunidades en direccion del vicnto .
. ReqUlera energia limpia y renovable ademas la conservaci6n como parte del proyecto.
Atentamente, -Jr ~. ( r ')
Nombre ~ ~Q U~7 V
Domicilio If) I vU () fOA..iJn AVL
Ciudad C. V. Estado ~6d190 Postal q { f ( (
Teleto{C,1 4, )~))-1 573 Correo Electr6nico r; <>'I().L (PlZ/;] (0)<.
Autonzo que se uttltce ml nombre en publico en apoyo de la postura antenor. Para mas mformacion, comu~ )
niquese con Coalici6n de SaJud AmbientaI (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, f. '
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing S.outh Bay Pawer Plant is an inefficient and .outdated facility
that has been palluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I suppart its re-
maval from the Bayfrant. Hawever, the new propased project seeks approval
to emit a camparable amaunt .of pallutian. We want cleaner air in the future,
nat the status qua I This is .our .only appartunity ta prevent future decades .of
pallutian and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired pawer plant propasal
. Reject any aptians that daes nat emit significantly less pallutian an
dawnwind cammunities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and canservatian as part .of
the project.
~ ("'f
't .'
........~
I
S~::ly,!f?PvI~1 C-~
Address b ir,'cJ!.1;; r~-<I J3t1I1'~
CitY{!!1 f{("- iI;slf) State (? ~ Zip 11'11/
Phane 7':)0-;) :>-1 b Ernail
I give permission to use myname in pubJic to support th~ above position. F~r more info.rmatio~ contact J
Environmental Health Coahtion (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, SUIte 310, NatIOnal City, CA 91950J
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing Sauth Bay Pawer Plant is an inefficient and .outdated facility
that has been palluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I sup part its re-
maval fram the Bayfrant. Hawever, the new propased praject seeks approval
ta emit a camp arable amaunt .of pallutian. We want cleaner air in the future,
nat the status qua I This is .our .only appartunity ta prevent future decades .of
pallutian and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make ana/her 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired pawer plant propasal
. Reject any aptians that daes nat emit significantly less pallutian an
dawnwind cammunities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and canservatian as part .of
the project.
Sincerely,
Name
Add
City
Phone
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact Y
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474"()220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950
*tt~
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing Sauth Bay Pawer Plant is an inefficient and .outdated facility
that has been palluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I suppart its re-
maval fram the Bayfrant. Hawever, the new propased praject seeks approval
ta emit a camp arable amaunt .of pollutian. We want cleaner air in the future,
nat the status qua! This is .our .only appartunity ta prevent future decades .of
pallutian and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don '/ make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired pawer plant prapasal
. Reject any aptians that daes nat emit significantly less pallutian 'an
dawnwind cammunities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and canservatian as part .of
the project.
qcW
(Y-\- p <7rq /1
{'cl_tJrZ.Z~ L002@CtN. ""-I-
/ ,'.
I give permissIOn to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact \)..).1
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile or Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950~<\\f'
Sr. Comisionado Geesman:
La actual Planta Energetica de la Bahia Sur es una instalaci6n ineficiente y
anticuada que ha estada cantaminanda el .oeste de Chula Vista desde las 1960' s.
Apaya que se quite del Frente de la Bahia. Sin embarga, el nueva prapuesta
proyecta busca ser aprabada para una cantidad camparable de cantaminaci6n.
iQueremas aire mas limpia en el futura, na e1 estatus qual Esta es nuestra 1'mica
apartunidad para prevenir decadas futuras de cantaminaci6n y buscar un futuro
energetica limpia.
POI' favor no corne/a 0/1'0 error de 50 anos.
Exhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que:
. Rechace la propuesta para una planta con "conductos de combustion" de 620MW.
. Rcchace cualquier opci6n que no reduzca la contaminaci6n a comunidades en direccionde] viento.
A~~::kr~l;;~"~"'~-
Domicilio ~Dc3 (J. V a:;' (3:;
'S V Estado ~ C6digo Postal '1.2/05
Telelono (,-,(1, 7'/5- 369;:t;orreo Electr6nico
Sincerel ,
Name
Address
City Ch..L V"J" State
Phane liJ/q 4lfi-u7t,,~ Email
-----
~-_."---"-
Ciudad
Autorizo que se uti lice mi nombre en publico en apoyo de 1a postura anterior. Para mas informacion, comu- .,. V
niquese con Coalicion de Salud Ambiental (619) 474.0220,401 Mile orCaTS Way, Suite 3lO, National City, ....\'t'
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing Sonth Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval from the Bayftont. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the tEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely, / ;7
Name J'\ () ~/-I. L \) n 1\ () C;e.) k
Address ~ f 9 rJi' ~ '1
City C h " j h \J I~-r;state (' p Zip 9/ 1//
Phone Ernail
tt..~
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position, For more information contact ~J"'.
Environmental Health Coahbon (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, SUIte 310, NatIOnal Ctty, CA 919S(f
__"__P___________.
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval ftom the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely,
Name
Address
City
Phone :t-31o/"f5
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact . ~
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474.0220, 40] Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950 ~.
.r
7
9t9(/
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been pollutmg western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval ftom the Bayftont. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status qnol This IS our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollutIOn and pursne a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the curr.ent 620MW duct-fIred power plant proposal
. Reject any optIOns that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwmd commum!1es. .
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
.~::IY~~~oAo
Address' f.=\r',:,,\ ~\"J , g'2..D
CltyCkL __ _ _State LA Zip~
PhoneffiJ -aCe \3 Email
~ive permiss;ol1 to use my. name in public to support the above position. For more infom1ation contact (
vlronmenta Health CoahtlOn (619) 474-0220,401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s: I support its re-
moval ftom the Bayftont. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursne a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit signifIcantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Reqnire clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely, \ /:)
Name C \"'lIcfo '!\c..VJO\('e-7
Address II (){) -r;J. ,,,.\-i...';" \ I c:e,
City (111. ~'" \. k,~ State cA Zip '1 'R \\
Phone(;I'I-4L+~?\O Email
,0
Itt~
1 give permission to use my ~ame in public to support th~ above position. For more information contact ,In
EnVironmental Health Coahbon (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 3lO, National City, CA 91950'~.J
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval from the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge tbe CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely,
Name'
Addrels
Citl'
Phone
I give permission to use my name in public to SUPP011 the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval from the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge tbe CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-frred power plant proposal
. Reject arty. options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely, 0 b b /' J 'I ^
Name ),.:)0 d L/1' rv ~\J1 ~
Address II () () -::::I:" dv"cjy-,GJ..,
City C'J-.ulk V ,,,dT_ State OflZip"
PhoneG;t~ 4 '}{i ~~"' wEmail rlo"",-
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220,401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950. j
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval from the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge tbe CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely,
Name -:\oe G.4' {'.c.
Address 1\00 ':!:.\,.\..,L,";"\<..\. r "-I
City ('J..,\.. \I"~ State CA Zip q t Q \\
PhoneC,I'I -tie z;-~ \0 \ Email
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coa1ition (619) 474.0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950. j
..~---_._--
Sr. Comisionado Geesman:
La actual Planta Energetica de la Bahia Sur es una instalaci6n ineficiente y
anticuada que ha estado contaminando el oeste de Chula Vista desde los 1960's.
Apoyo que se quite del Frente de la Bahia. Sin embargo, el nuevo propuesto
proyecto busca ser aprobada para una cantidad comparable de contaminaci6n.
i Queremos aire mas limpio en el futuro, no el estatus quo! Esta es nuestra {mica
oportunidad para prevenir decadas futuras de contaminaci6n y buscar un futuro
energetico limpio.
Par favor no cornela otro error de 50 arias.
Exhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que:
. Rechace la propuesta para una planta con "conductos de combusti6n" de 620MW
. Rechace eualquier opei6n que no reduzca la contaminaci6n a comunidades en direecton del viento
. Requiera energia limpia y renovable ademas la conservaci6n como parte del proyecto
Atentamente, . J j 1
Nombre Frl Yltull'f'" ~Y)
Domicilio / 'i' '/ '&-/)..,/-; "... ,'"0
Ciudad ('t,,i< 1J<::r/.:. Estado ~ Codlgo Postal '11"!/O
Telefono
Correo Electr6nico
Autorizo que se utilice mi nombre en publico en apoyo de la postma anterior. Para mas intormacion, con1l1-
niquese C{JO CoaJici6n de Salud Ambiental (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City,
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval rrom the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewab1e energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely, \
Name -;Se~~ M.<\.1()\&..
Address noD J:,"rL~\<:l I
cityOwl... \J-.~ State (A
Phone e,q 1- ~ :}-~~ Email
EI'.\
Zipqt'W
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact J
Environmental Health CoaJition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Can; Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950. "
----
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval ITom the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely, M \
Name ~~~ a'1,D"c.
Address \\()() 'I...J~,,-\ . 813
City~, II... \h...k. State CA ZiP9..l.1lL-
PhoneG.ICj~(o"lI-'f18'1 Email
.tt1~
T give permif>Sion to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (6J9) 474w0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval ITom the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want deaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mtstake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-frred power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely, \ (r1 ~
Name /l.. en 0
Address nOn '3:"",A. ....~\'" \
cityGlwl.... \It"'\'" StateCA
PhoneGlq -5'e.('~~~ Email
E1..
Zip q \,\\1
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474w0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950 .I
,
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval ITom the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-frred power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require dean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely, \
Name-----f:\r-t'.,.() t\ju'\ 1&....
Address 1\ 00 J:vt d.~\.:.l ~3 -::r
\ .J
Cit}(l......1... \J~;....... State UA Zip 9 \"\ \I
Phone(.lG -c.q I-q~k) Ernail
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more mformatlOn contact
EnVironmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of CaTS Way, Suite 3lO, National City, CA 91950
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval from the Bayrront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely, C
Name~ P(~'\ C !',.'?-V\()Z q
Address liDO 1.V\'\"....\.,,,,,1 , \)43
CityC."'-.,\" \b...I,... State C-A Zip &} to( II
Phoner^1 q - 41.:1 -e32+Email
.'~ I r"\ -..
tt..~
;
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 3JO, National City, CA 91950 j
Sr, Comisionado Geesman:
La actual Planta Energetica de la Babia Sur es una instalaci6n ineficiente y
anticuada que ha estado contaminando el oeste de Chula Vista desde los 1960's.
Apoyo que se quite del Frente de la Babia. Sin embargo, el nuevo propuesto
proyecto busca ser aprobada para una cantidad comparable de contaminaci6n.
iQueremos aire mas limpio en el futuro, no el estatus quo! Esta es nuestra Imica
o'portunidad para prevenir decadas futuras de contaminaci6n y buscar un futuro
energetico limpio.
Pbr favor no cornela afro error de 50 aflOS.
Exhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que:
. Rechace la pfopuesta para una planta con "conductos de combustion" de 620MW
. Rcchace cualquier opci6n que no reduzca la contaminacion a comunidades en direcci6n del viento
. Requiem energia Jimpia y renovable ademas la conservaci6n como parte del proyecto.
~"
A~;~:;ente, bctol fl~ !%1fK~d
DomicilioJIDO C3cp 1I. ~
CiUdad~stado~ C6digo Postal qlq::J~
Teletono (../q -12tJ 1)(/62 Correo Electr6nico
tt~
Autorizo que se utilice mi nombre en publico en apoyo de la postum anterior Para mas mformacion, com.u-
niquese con Coalici6n de Salud Ambiental (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, ,/
rt.. 010<(\
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval rrom the Bayrront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to etrllt a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don 'f make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-frred power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit signifrcantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely,
Name
Address
City C J,..., t\c.. \J t",\q
Phone t.f7-Co - I 2 r;,~
('
State CA Zip
Email
I give permissIOn to use my name in public to support the above position, For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Car.> Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950 /
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and, outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval rrom the Bayrront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to etrllt a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo I This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely,
Name :Ye_Q~€.f.t L'(,/\ y\
Address 1100 ".^{L~\(,,,-\ ~\"J * (2,LL
City~"")\c- \,~ State CA ZipC/t'HI
Phone(.( q - ~\~-R3Jt'; Email
I gIve permission to use my name in publie to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220. 401 Mile of Cars Way. Suite 310, Natino:11 r.itv rA qlQ<;n
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval rrom the Bayrront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CIIC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-ftred power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit signiftcantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely, ~. k ~
Name -T~ \ 0 S, y\
Address ~~"~ ~L~;;.j~ J1ud ~
City CIA, J\ State{' A Zip 9 ;c(l1
Phone (Pili ....422-1 '-IH Email
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health CoalitlOn (619) 474.0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950. )
--_..._---_._._--~---~-
Sr. Comisionado Geesman:
La actual Planta Energetica de la Bahia Sur es una instalaci6n ineftciente y
anticuada que ha estado contaminando e1 oeste de Chula Vista desde los 1960's.
Apoyo que se quite del Frente de la Bahia. Sin embargo, el nuevo propuesto
proyecto busca ser aprobada para una cantidad comparahle de contaminaci6n.
jQueremos aire mas limpio en el futuro, no el estatus quo! Esta es nuestra (mica
oportunidad para prevenir decadas futuras de contarninaci6n y buscar un futuro
energetico limpio.
POI' favor no corneta otro error de 50 anos.
Exhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que:
. Rechace la propue"ta para una pJanta con "conductos de combustion" de 620MW
. Rechace cualquicr opci6n que no reduzca la contaminaci6n a comunidades en direccion del viento .
. Requiera energia limpia y renovable ademas la conservaci6n como parte del proyecto.
A~;~~:ente, /AJ{( rr tfJ hbIJ f
Domicilio II ~~ :th(J I(/~~ PJv #: r. eYE
Ciudad (~h/llt1 vrsitl ESlE.doM- C6digoPoslal q19/1
Telefana
Carrea Electr6nico
Autorizo que se utilice mi nombre en publico en apoyo de la postura anterior. Para mas infonuaci6n, comu- /
~i~u:~: :~n CoalLcion de Salud AmbientaJ (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of CaTS Way, Suite 310, NatIOnal City,
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefftcient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval rrom the Bayrront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-ftred power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit signiftcantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewahle energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely, . .
Name
Address
City
Phone
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact 1
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474.0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, _~ational City, CA 91950. ~
-~------ ------
--------------
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefftcient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s: I support its re-
moval rrom the Bayrront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit signiftcantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
S~~::~t/t(1't0 ~I012/{( !/tfllI{{Jlltt/2
Address ) () I J J Pf{eAU?Y'r) .IIV-r.
~~~ne ~i~:;~~:~~ Zip q/qll
I gi~e permission to use my. ~ame in public to support th~ above position For more information contact J
Environmental Health CoalitiOn (619) 474-0220, 401 Mtle of Cars Way, SUite 310, National City, CA 91950$
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval ftom the Bayftont. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo 1 This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely, - LL~.,.----..,
Name ~\ (1.(\) !J..QV'lV~e- L-
Address 11-+ -:L \ (z'~'\JThN
City ~,^\J\"1) \J ,,,-,A- State (' Jt- Zip~ \ ~ \ \
Phone ,[q) '"\l-q- \01.\ S Email
*tf~
I give permission to use my name in public to SUPPOlt the above position. For more information contact fD
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval ftom the Bayftont. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely,
Name~l:ext A. Wa<;<\n S....
Address:t'1 te"M- ~:~~t
City Ch ,,\J- State cA Zip q ,q II
Phone (; I If - 4.J. r> -1(54 Email
---_. --..-
. .tt1..~;"
~0J
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Hcalth Coalition (619) 474.0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval ftom the Bayftont. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely,
Name /h1Yi:t('d_ j-!-6V/J....
Address' /L/J-I./. /Jrr1T!I~~'
City c.. v StateC>~ ' Zip tf 19 / /
PhoneColQ- 4'lD- 11Hz... Email
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more mformahon contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474~0220, 401 Milc of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950
PhDl'Lb,;~I" -" . .___.____.._.._..__~_.
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s: I support its re-
moval ftom the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely,
Name fJora M~~
Address / () r Co LWf\'\-.-' ;(\v-t
City ~\I,stt\ State IY4 Zip ,,('It] /1
Phone lot 9 - q J -:J. -/4-3 3 Email
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
EnvironmentaJ Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 3iO, NationaJ City, CA 9J950
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval from the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind cormnunities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
I give permission to use my name. in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474.0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, NationaJ City, CA 91950 ~
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval from the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind cormnunities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely" .
Name~e5t'tt ~~t~'~
Address WI (,5", \'~
Cit;Qh IV-I \1[5-\(' Stater) Zip q ,e; \1
Phona.~p..\0SorR.DfC!Emai1 rc.,".fYYl~~,\<\-"Q).
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950
1/
Sr. Comisionado Geesman:
La actual Planta Energetica de la Bahia Sur es una instalaci6n ineficiente y
anticuada que ha estado contaminando el oeste de Chula Vista desde los 1960' s.
Apoyo que se quite del Frente de la Bahia. Sin embargo, e1 nuevo propuesto
proyecto busca ser aprobada para una cantidad comparable de contaminaci6n.
iQueremos aire mas limpio en el futuro, no el estatus quo! Esta es nuestra (mica
oportunidad para prevenir decadas futuras de contaminaci6n y bus car JIn futuro
energetico limpio.
Por favor no corneta otro error de 50 ailos.
Exhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que:
. Rechace la propuesta para una planta con "conductos de combustion" de 620MW
. Rec.hace cualquier opci6n que no reduzca 1a contaminaci6n a comunidades en direcdon del';viento
. Requiera energia limpia y renovable ademas la conservaci6n como parte del proyecto.
/
A ten tamente, "
Nombre I'1A{:.IA dF Lou(JF~ -:::;A,()ch(~'7-
Domicilio ?; ;}"'7-Ht> 55 'S f-
Ciudad ch{jtA.I/i<;I-/1 Estado~ C6digo Postal '1/ ?//
Telefono 6/ f. 5 g 5-(;Z,k Correa Electr6nico
~utorizo que se u.ti!ice mi nombre en publico en apoyo de la postora anterior Para mas jnformaci~n> cornu- .M,J
Olquese con CoahclOo de Salud AmbIenta] (619) 474-0220, 401 M11e orCars Way, SUite 310, National City?\)
_. ~. n"n
Sr. Comisionado Geesman:
La actual Planta Energetica de la Bahia Sur es una instalaci6n ineficiente y
anticuada que ha estado contaminando el oeste de Chula Vista aesde los 1960's.
Apoyo que se quite del Frente de la Bahia. Sin embargo, el nuevo propuesto
proyecto busca ser aprobada para una cantidad comparable de contaminaci6n.
iQueremos' aire mas limpio en el futuro, no el estatus quo! Esta es nuestra (mica
oportunidad para prevenir decadas futuras de contaminaci6n y buscar un futuro
energetico limpio.
Por favor no corneta otro error de 50 anos.
Exhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que:
. Rechace la propuesta para una planta con "conductos de combustion" de 620MW
. Rechace cualquier opci6n que no reduzca la contaminaci6n a comunidades en direcci6n de! viento
. Requiera energia limpia y renovable ademas la conservaci6n como parte de! proyecto.
'. -
'" h\
tU~
Atentamente, .'\'"" rD / ~ ~ /
Nombre 005--1' (') au C-OMZ'2/e "Z.-
Domicilio b -;;-9 1!f(l77 c;/-
Ciudad r:~ 1// '" \I, <,1<1 Estado c:-~ C6digo Postal
TelefOn{C?f 9) 'S?f1)-12 'I pcorreo Electr6nico tit: 4-"'
Autorizo que se u.ti~i,ce mi nombre en publico en apoyo de la postura anterior Para mas informacion, cornu- /
~Iqu_~: ~?n CoahclOn de Sa!ud AmbIenta! (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, SUite 310, NatIOnal City,
Sr, Comisionado Geesman:
La actual Planta Energetica de la Bahia Sur es una instalacion ineficiente y
anticuada que ha estado contaminando el oeste de Chula Vista desde los 1960's.
Apoyo que se quite del Frente de la Bahia. Sin embargo, el nuevo propuesto
proyecto busca ser aprobada para una cantidad comparable de contaminacion.
i Queremos aire mils limpio en el futuro, no el estatus quo! Esta es nuestra unica
oportunidad para prevenir decadas futuras de contaminacion y buscar un futuro
energetico !impio.
Par favor no cometa otro error de 50 arlOS.
Exhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que:
. Rcchace]a propuesta para una planta con "conductos de combustion" de 620MW
. Rechace cualquier opci6n que no reduzca la.contaminaci6n a comunidades en direccion del vicnto
. ReqUJcra energia limpia y renovable ademas la conservaci6n como parte del proyecto
Atentamente, r? ~
Nombre Vi.- ~
Domicilio (p l4 Mc!;') 4.
ciudad~ E,tado11L- C6digo postal1li4
Telefono Correa Electronico
Autorim que se utilice mi nombrc en publico en apoyo de la postura anterior. Para mas mtormaci6n, cornu- /
niquese con Coalici6n de SaJud Ambiental (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, ,
--.----
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval from the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our ouly opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind corurnunities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely,
Name
Address
City (,jI]I\.JO
Phone
j
I give permission to use my name in public to SUPP011 the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, Nationa] City, CA 91950
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. 1 support its re-
moval from the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind corurnunities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
SinCerel?? h <:":'. f
Name .{'6 0'1 rz;ya
Address ~St? /11055 <51' H-/65
City ~, V, State CA- Zip 9/9//
PhonEW/9 - 5 ;?L;'-( o9Z Email
-
t' .
(J J.-.
J give permIssion to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact (
EnVIronmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s: 1 support its re-
moval from the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please dDn 't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind corurnunities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
S~~::~ ~~l;)
Addre~ t;~&8
Cityii}ct'u \ h,?>fe1 State Ck Zip Pi II
Phone (orOr 70Yf...- t.g~mail
I give permission to use my name in pubJic to SUppOIt the above position For more information contact /
EnvironmentaJ Health Coalition (6]9) 474-0220, 40] Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval crom the Baycront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don '/ make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely,
Name
Address
City
Phone
I
tb~
I
I give penmssion to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474M0220, 401 Mile or CaTS Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950
Sr. Comisionado Geesman:
La actual Planta Energetica de la Bahia Sur es una instalaci6n ineficiente y
anticuada que ha estado contaminando el oeste de Chula Vista desde 10s 1960's.
Apoyo que se quite del Frente de la Bahia. Sin embargo, el nuevo propuesto
proyecto busca ser aprobada para una cantidad comparable de contaminaci6n.
iQueremos aire mas limpio en el futuro, no el estatus quo! Esta es nuestra (mica
oportunidad para prevenir decadas futuras de contaminaci6n y buscar un futuro
energetico limpio.
POI' favor no cometa otro error de 50 anos.
Exhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que:
. Rechace la propuesta para una planta con "conductos de combustion" de 620MW.
. Rechace cua.!quier apcian que no reduzca la contaminaci6n a comunidades en direccion del Vlento
. Requiera energia limpia y renovable ademas la conservaci6n como parte del proyccto
tt~
Atentamente,
Nombre
q/7f(
Correa Electr6nico
Autorizo que se utilice mi Hombre en publico en apoyo de la postura anterior. Para mas informacion, comu-
niquese con Coalicion de Salud Ambiental (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, NationaJ City,
./
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval from the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo I This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don '/ make ana/her 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fIred power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely,
Name .JoN K. !3EtJrJif'J(,ER.
Address (;51./ !ho~~ 6\'. A1>r. #-It..6
City C.1iIJLI\ VIS\" A, State CA Zip Cj I
Phone Ernail ;~ ( 20
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220,401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950. 1/
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 19605. I support its re-
moval crom the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely, 0 \ J-- hI \:>' \ oj a,Yi'1d (
Name ~E'~ \,u-- \'-.: \J eJ-~ f
Address \.D \...\. 'b {'f\ b<-:f~ -:::4 S 'S-::t-
City ('~,~ 0'6~ State Cc, Zip "1\'/(1
Phone vl'1\LPlo-"f1z,(P Email
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health CoaJition (619) 474~0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, NatIOnal City, CA 91950. 11
Sr. Comisionado Geesman:
La actual Planta Energetica de la Bahia Sur es una instalaci6n ineficiente y
anticuada que ha estado contaminando el oeste de Chula Vista desde los 1960's.
Apoyo que se quite del Frente de la Bahia. Sin embargo, el nuevo propuesto
proyecto busca ser aprobada para una cantidad comparable de contaminaci6n.
i Queremos aire mas limpio en el futuro, no el estatus quo! Esta es nuestra Unica
oportunidad para prevenir decadas futuras de contaminaci6n y buscar un futuro
energetico limpio.
Par favor no cometa otro error de 50 afios.
Exhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que:
. Rechace la propuesta para una planta con "conductos de combustion" de 620MW
. Rechace cualquier opd6n que no reduzca la contaminaci6n a comunidades en direcci6n del vieoto
. Requiera energia limpia y renovabJe ademas la conservaci6n como parte del proyecto
Domicilio
Atentamente,
Nombre
Ciudad
Telefono
Correa Electr6nico
Autorizo que se utilice mi nomhrc cn publico en apoyo de la postura antenor. Para mas informacion, comu-
niquese con Coalicion de Salud Ambiental (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of CaTs Way, Suite 310, National City, ./
~. ~. ~-~
----
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval from the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fIred power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely, ). - VI
Name -JHff~ ~,u-8
Address (Of . (~/J2.c
City c. ( V "7 State (f] Zip ~ ~
Phone S0S -66() ') Email JQCI:!vPcc, (. \;b.krJ.
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. or more mformatlOn contact /
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0120, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950 '
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval from the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities. .
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
SincerelYr ~. . - r ( j,.{ C I
Name T"J"CKL Ill; oil IV;. 'J/1 /VLPlG:<
Address I ~'b 0 f,< tv"" d"-_/,,> UI) 10 A v' F
City ~" . State ~) Zip 0" I q (!
Phonft~ )q')'7 - fPdEmail
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position For more information contact J
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950.
,-~---_._- -----------.
----------
Sr. Comisionado Geesman:
La actual Planta Energetica de la Bahia Sur es una instalaci6n ineficiente y
anticuada que ha estado contaminando el oeste de Chula Vista desde los 1960's.
Apoyo que se quite del Frente de la Bahia. Sin embargo, el nuevo propuesto
proyecto busca ser aprobada para una cantidad comparable de contaminaci6n.
iQueremos' aire mas limpio en el futuro, no el estatus quo! Esta es nuestra (mica
oportunidad para prevenir decadas futuras de contaminaci6n y buscar un futuro
energetico limpio.
Par favor no cometa otro error de 50 afios.
Exhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que:
. Rechace la propuesta para unaplanta c-on "c-onductos de combustion" de 620MW
. Rechace cualquier opcion que no reduzca la contaminaci6n a comunidades en direcci6n del viento .
. Requiera energia limpl3 y renovable ademas la conservaclon como parte del proyecto.
'~::~~ ~~-
DonuClho - / '/j t1:l re-
CiUda~ft;0Y [)~tado ~ C6digo Postal fit/(
Telefo c) 2:' 7 B~orreo Electr6nico d Ib ~ -
Autonzo que se utilice mi nombre en publico en apoyo de la postura anterior. Para mas informacion, comu-
niquese con Coalicion de Salud Ambiental (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, ~
Sr. Comisionado Geesman:
La actual Planta Energetica de la Bahia Sur es una instalaci6n ineficiente y
anticuada que ha estado contaminando el oeste de Chula Vista desde los 1960's.
Apoyo que se quite del Frente de la Bahia. Sin embargo, el nuevo propuesto
proyecto busca ser aprobada para una cantidad comparable de contaminaci6n.
iQueremos aire mas limpio en el futuro, no el estatus quo! Esta es nuestra (mica
oportunidad para prevenir decadas futuras de contaminaci6n y buscar un futuro
energetico limpio.
Por favor no cometa otro error de 50 afios.
Exhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que:
. Rechace la propuesta para una planta con "conductos de combustion" de 620MW
. Rechace cualquier opci6n que no reduzca \a contaminaclon a comunidades en direcci6n del viento
. Requiera energia limpia y renovable ademas la conservaci6n como parte del proyecto.
Atentamente, ~'tlY7V 6- If1/1
::~~::o ,~?, /' ~ tf?}p?~ . ~
Ciuda~ ,4' rI (' 4 1//') ,1tEstado ~ C6digo Postal ::L!il (
Telefo(f;/1/L7/-o3:5~orreo Electr6nico /l/r)~
Autorizo que se utihce mi nombre en ~ubliCO en apoyo de \a postUl:a antenor. Para ma~ informacion, com~" /
mquese con Coalici6n de Salud AmbtentaJ (6J9) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, SUite 310, National CIty,
_. ~. ~"~
-..----.-
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. ] support its re-
moval from the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject aJiyoptions that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely, r.e
Name r:C\ \ f\
Address 0\ tt 0 ~
City CJ;v()(C!. '-J t ~ ~tate CA Zip tt
Pho~ - t~ ~ -\\\) Email ~d(/O r 1 jz@ -PV\{j IJ . (/
1 give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact I
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474.0220, 401 Mile of CaTS Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950
Sr. Comisionado Geesman:
La actual Planta Energetica de la Bahia Sur es una instalaci6n ineficiente y
anticuada que ha estado contaminando el oeste de Chula Vista desde los 1960's.
Apoyo que se quite del Frente de la Bahia. Sin embargo, el nuevo propuesto
proyecto busca ser aprobada para una cantidad comparable de contaminaci6n.
iQueremos aire mas limpio en el futuro, no el estatus quo! Esta es nuestra (mica
oportunidad para prevenir decadas futuras de contaminaci6n y buscar un futuro
energetico limpio.
Por favor no cometa otro error de 50 afios.
Exhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que:
. Rechace la propuesta para una planta con "conductos de combustion" de 620MW
. Rechace cualquier opci6n que no reduzca la contaminacion a comunidades en direccion defviento
. Requiera encrgia limpia y renovable ademas la conservacion como parte del proyecto.
Atentamente, 01 n, i I
Nombre . I~~ i{ i/~ -r--
Domicilio J.D.I Of ~D1() YurlD CZr./P
ciudactChuJG l(IS h Estado...tEL C6digo Postal ~l
Telefon{~D!) Z!.Q{,-!IJqq Correo Electr6nico of' kb\.00 a ,,ve;t
Autorizo que se utilice mi nombre en publico en apoyo de la post a anterior Para mas informacion, comu-
~i~u~::~?n CoaJicion de Salud Ambiental (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, /
,-" -----...-----.-
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and. outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. ] support its re-
moval from the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservatio
the project.
S.6~.~T,
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of CaTS Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950. .,.........
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. 1 support its re-
moval from the BaYITont. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amolU1t of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportlU1ity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely,
Name L.a." C-L 'J-JLV.i2 t'6 b....
Address 10 S '').- J e{'f~.."""
City C-...~t<, Ui5T... State 0\ Zip lilc;/I
Phone G l/j ~- S-D~~Email L~h(.-(. ~"'''-I'''~j}'''' ..Hrr 'i.1.,,/. (.-=>"'"'
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact /
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950.
tt[..
':....-~
!
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval from the BaYITont. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amolU1t of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
{'lease don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely,
Name iA<;,-ti\..
Address ~
City
Phon
I give permission to use my name m public to support the above position. For more information contact J
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval ITom the BaYITont. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution' on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely, ~
Name flllIl1f/N MJ4on.5 f'Jllce/Vo4
Address JI7'fJ.I1 ,ff' PFeY<::t!J/V IN.
City {' flu/A Vl!d /1 State ,,4 Zip q/ '111
Phonet"~}''I6'7IjB;( Email
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental HeaJth Coalition (619) 474-0220, 40J Mile of Cars Way, Suite 3JO, National City, CA 91950. 'if
----
---------------
Sr. Comisionado Geesman:
La actual Planta Energetica de la Bahia Sur es lU1a instalaci6n ineficiente y
anticuada que ha estado contaminando el oeste de Chula Vista desde los 1960's.
Apoyo que se quite del Frente de la Bahia. Sin embargo, el nuevo propuesto
proyecto busca ser aprobada para una cantidad comparable de contaminaci6n.
iQueremos 'aire mas limpio en el futuro, no el estatus quo! Esta es nuestra (mica
oportunidad para prevenir decadas futuras de contaminaci6n y buscar un futuro
energetico limpio.
Par favor no cornela otro error de 50 anos.
Exhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que:
. Rcchace la propuesta para una planta con "conductos de combustion" de 620MW
. Rechace cualqUlcr opcion que no reduzca la contaminacion a comunidades en direccion del viento .
. Requiera energia limpla y renovable ademas la conservacion como parte del proyecto.
A:;~~ente,1:,./ D. /10 () '\ ~ ~7
Domicilio / 0 ~ ~ I; r- r- ~ ;;, <: If) 11\ fJ If-
Ciudad C. V Estado.c...4.... C6digo Postal 7 ( r; /1
Telefono
Correa Electr6nico
Autorizo que se utilice mi nombre en publico en apoyo de la postura anterior. Para mas informacion, comu-
niquese con Coalici6n de Salud Ambiental (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, ~
Sr. Comisionado Geesman:
La actual Planta Energetica de la Bahia Sur es una instalacion ineficiente y
anticuada que ha estado contaminando el oeste de Chula Vista desde los 1960's.
Apoyo que se quite del Frente de la Bahia. Sin embargo, el nuevo propuesto
proyecto busca ser aprobada para una cantidad comparable de contaminacion.
iQueremos aire mas limpio en el futuro, no el estatus quo! Esta es nuestra imica
oportunidad para prevenir decadas futuras de contaminacion y buscar un futuro
energetico limpio.
Par favor no cornela olro error de 50 alios.
Exhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que:
. Rechace la propuesta para una planta con "conductos de combustion" de 620~
. Rechace cualquier opcion que no reduzca la contammaci6n a comunidades en direccion del viento
. Requiera energta limpia y renovab!e ademas 1a conservaci6n como pm1e de! proyecto
.tt~
u de L J'V>-<-
Up.
Correa Electr6nico
Autorizo que se uti lice mi nombre cn publico en apoyo de la pastura anterior. Para mas intormaci6n, comu- I
niquese con Coalicion de Salud Ambiental (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of CaTS Way, Suite 310, National City,
CA 91950
Sr. Comisionado Geesman:
La actual Planta Energetica de la Bahia Sur es una instalacion ineficiente y
anticuada que ha estado contaminando el oeste de Chula Vista desde los 1960's.
Apoyo que se quite del Frente de la Bahia. Sin embargo, e1 nuevo propuesto
proyecto busca ser aprobada para una cantidad comparable de contarninacion.
iQueremos aire mas limpio en el futuro, no el estatus quo! Esta es nuestra imica
oportunidad para prevenir decadas futuras de contaminacion y buscar un futuro
energetico limpio.
Por favor no cornela olro error de 50 alios.
Exhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que:
. Rechace ia propuesta para una planta con "conductos de combustion" de 620MW
. Rechace cualquier opcion que no reduzca la contaminacion a comunidades en direcci6n del viento
. Requiera energia limpia y renovable ademas}a conservaci6n como parte del proyecto.
Atentamonte, ! M ~
Nomb", t::::....-I c:::..s. <.Y....s. "-- C r Vl N
Ci' --,, ~
Domicilio /1171 / ,..,.!J rd.-s 'ZJt~
C i~ r-. 9/Dl
Cil1dad Estado ~ C6digo Postal -/
Tel.rof <61'tJ?<"~-)~~,ectr6niCO . . .. \1 i
Autorizoque se utlhce ml nombre en publico en apoyo de la postura antenor, Para m~ mformacl~n, com~- d-i'-'
mquese con Coalici6n de Salud Ambiental (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, SUite 310, NatIOnal City,
ft1.~
I
Sr, Comisionado Geesman:
La actual Planta Energetica de la Bahia Sur es una instalacion ineficiente y
anticuada que ha estado contaminando el oeste de Chula Vista desde los 1960's.
Apoyo que se quite del Frente de la Bahia. Sin embargo, el nuevo propuesto
proyecto busca ser aprobada para una cantidad comparable de contaminacion.
iQueremos aire mas limpio en el futuro, no el estatus quo! Esta es nuestra imica
oportunidad para prevenir decadas futuras de contaminacion y buscar un futuro
energetico limpio.
Par favor no cornela olro error de 50 alios.
Exhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que:
. Rechace la propuesta para una planta con "conductos de combustion" de 620~
. Rechace eualquier opci6n que no reduzca la contaminacion a comunidades en direccion de! Viento
. Requiera energia lirnpia y renovable ademas la conservaci6n como parte del proyecto
Atentamente, /1-/ /' /'
Nomb", ..;nil C(~ I >>1',)/ t:{ "?
Domicilio / () 7 () (It' If/:.. ~ c../fr/.em.( e.-
Ciudad C V EsredoCA- C6digo Postal 9/~11
1"
Jn~~
Telefono
Correa Electr6nico
Autorizo que se utilice mi nombre en publico en apoyo de la postura anterior. Para mas informacion, cornu- /
niquese con Coaliclon de Salud AmblCntal (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, SUite 310, Natwnal City, V
CA 91950
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated f~cility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support tts re-
moval ftom the Bayftont. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don 'I make anolher 50 year mislake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal .
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollutIOn on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of \
the project. \1\"
~ ~.
Sincerely, .If. ~ !
Name c,/v ~ A [.....a0L V'L. ~
Address .lJ J 1'1 .q t/ <..
Cit4'. Stat~>lf-Zip '1/ 'PI I
Phone7f9';/- W{p_ Email-
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above positIOn. For more lllf~rmation contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220. 401 Mile of Cars Way, SUite 310, NatwnaJ City, CA 91950
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. ] support its re-
movaI from the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind connnunities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely,
Name e OQJ f '-j 1\',& ~
Address i () j (? I.IOC/P hk'v}) AJ(;
City (W U\.p, v~i'.t_State U\; Zip 111 "III
PhonE! 6 (') I LlZ"\ -'i iArX> Bmail
I give permission to use my name in public to sUPP0l1 the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950
------- -----
.-
___ _m___________
Sr. Comisionado Geesman:
La actual Planta Energetica de la Bahia Sur es una instaIaci6n ineficiente y
anticuada que ha estado contaminando el oeste de Chula Vista desde los 1960's.
Apoyo que se quite del Frente de la Bahia. Sin embargo, el nuevo propuesto
proyecto busca ser aprobada para una cantidad comparable de contaminaci6n.
iQueremos aire mas limpio en el futuro, no el estatus quo! Esta es nuestra (mica
oportunidad para prevenir decadas futuras de contaminaci6n y buscar un futuro
energetico limpio.
POI' favor no cornela 011'0 error de 50 afios.
Exhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que:
. Rechace la propuesta para una planta con "conductos de combustion" de 620MW
. Rechace cualquler opci6n que no reduzca Ja contaminaci6n a comunidades en direccion del viento
. Requiera energia Jimpia y renovabie ademas la conservacion como parte del proyecto
Atentamente, L~'r7 / ~
Nombre ~~{ t t:.- L!--o ~
Domicilio II c.;\ \.\m ~ ~ ~
Ciudad (' v \j , Estado LJr C6digo PostalQ/9 I )
Telelono Lj lb-OW)
11~
rJ \;J/"
Autorizo que se utilice mi nombre en publico en apoyo de la postura anterior. Para mas informacion, comu-
niquese con Coalici6n de Salud Ambiental (619) 474~0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City,
Correa Electr6nico
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval from the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don '( make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposaI
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind connnunities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely, ) I ) ~l
Name ,_ 05/11,;" II( tJl"or-e,,>
Address &0 C /I/",1/,? 5<1-
,
City (' f~ vi <1 {II 5/4 State (.L Zip q 1'1((
Phone {;t~ 'I17-co6~ Email T' f? Crull ,^ (f?J l'",t,,,,o.
'!!
'\)
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile or Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950
~----------- ------
_______ u__
----
Sr. Comisionado Geesman:
La actuaI Planta Energetica de la Bahia Sur es una instalaci6n ineficiente y
anticuada que ha estado contaminando el oeste de Chula Vista desde los 1960's.
Apoyo que se quite del Frente de la Bahia. Sin embargo, el nuevo propuesto
proyecto busca ser aprobada para una cantidad comparable de contaminaci6n.
iQueremos aire mas limpio en el futuro, no el estatus quo! Esta es nuestra (mica
oportunidad para prevenir decadas futuras de contaminaci6n y buscar un futuro
energetico limpio.
POI' favor no cornela 011'0 error de 50 afios.
Exhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que:
. Rechace la propuesta para una planta con "conductos de combustion" de 620MW
. Rcchace cualquier opcion que no reduzca la contaminaci6n a comunidades en direccion del viento
. Requiera energia limpia y renovable ademas la conservacion como parte del proyecto
Atentamente, L
Nombre (I) Los 'CU P0 ((0 .D
Domicilio 101 <) 0 I\, Ie LA. vJ IV ~ .
Ciudad C bl U It:> v \\llIstado~ C6digo Postal ~ I q I{
Teletono lo' l{) fcq (-70 It:Qeo Electr6nico
"'
.tt~
.
Autorizo que se utilice mi nombre en publico en apoyo de la postura anterior. Para mas informacion, comu-
niquese con Coalicion de Salud Ambiental (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310. National City,
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval from the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge tbe tEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fIred power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit signifIcantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely,
Name 'j 0 (a (l d<- I/:xt-rp'-
Address t&'fJD lfY)))ss ST ilfk
City C f'lul It . '( S W State U1 Zip 9/1 (I
Phone /PIC( l.f2r,5W!7Ernail
I give permissIOn to use my name in pubhc to support the above position. For more information contact
EnvironmentaJ Health Coalition (619) 474~0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval from the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don'/ make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fIred power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit signifIcantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely,
Name
Address U (;
City (lJv- (F1
Phone
/
,tt~~
j
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474~0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an ineffIcient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval from the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue 11 clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake,
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit signifIcantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
tit,,,, y
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an ineffIcient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s: I support its re-
moval from the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don'/ make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely, ~~~~/,A/~~
Narne~9~
Address /,01 .Y"/ &;;;//"'$~ .r/'~ c;.::-
City .0./-",?Jp !~ ;:.fPate Zip '7//~
Phone 1~~~~ail
l
.
I give permission to use my name in public to \>'Upport the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950
Sr. Comisionado Geesman:
La actual Planta Energetica de la Bahia Sur es una instalaci6n ineficiente y
anticuada que ha estado contaminando el oeste de Chula Vista desde los 1960's.
Apoyo que se quite del Frente de la Bahia. Sin embargo, el nuevo propuesto
proyecto busca ser aprobada para una cantidad comparable de contaminaci6n.
iQueremos aire mas limpio en el futuro, no e1 estatus quo! Esta es nuestra (mica
oportlmidad para prevenir decadas futuras de contaminaci6n y buscar un futuro
energetico limpio.
Por Javor no comefa ofro error de 50 anos.
Exhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que:
. Rechace 1a propuesta para una pIanta con "conductos de combustion" de 620MW
. Rechace cuaJquier opcion que no reduzca la contaminacion a comunidades en direccion del viento
. Requiera energia limpia y renovable ademas la conservacion como parte del proyecto
DomidIio :..-- ~ -e.
Ciudad stado C:& C6digo Postal q 1911
Telefonr{;..f'1- 671 1t:)~9 Correo Electr6nico
Autorizo que se uti lice mi nomhre en publico en apoyo de la postura anterior. Para mas informacion, comu-
niquese con Coalicion de SaJud Ambiental (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City,
CA 91950
----------,--
Sr. Comisionado Geesman:
La actual Planta Energetica de la Bahia Sur es una instalaci6n ineficiente y
anticuada que ha estado contaminando el oeste de Chula Vista desde ]os 1960's.
Apoyo que se quite del Frente de la Bahia. Sin embargo, el nuevo propuesto
proyecto busca ser aprobada para una cantidad comparable de contarninaci6n.
iQueremos aire mas limpio en el futuro, no el estatus quo! Esta es nuestra (mica
oportunidad para prevenir decadas futuras de contaminaci6n y buscar un futuro
energetico limpio.
Pbr favor no comela ofro error de 50 anos.
Exhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que: /
. Rechace la propuesta para una planta con "conductos de combustion" de 620MW
. Rechace cualquier opeion que no reduzca la contaminacion a comumdades en direcci6n del viento
. Requiera energia limpia y renovable ademas la conservacion como parte del proyecto.
Atentamente, -L
Nombre jY!/J,Rhl'1t1P/ It:} 1//J'S9'UE~
Domicilio //) /27 /EFFER~(jj:) <:;T
C V ~ EstadoCP C6digoPostal9'19/;"
,. :',\
j~
Ciudad
Telefono
Corree Electr6nico
Autorizo que se utilice mi nombre en publico en apoyo de la postura anterior. Para mas informacion, comu-
niquese con Coalicion de Salud AmbientaJ (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile or Cars Way, Suite 310, National City,
rA Qlo<:.n
J
Sr. Comisionado Geesman:
La actual Planta Energetica de la Bahia Sur es una instalaci6n ineficiente y
anticuada que ha estado contaminando el oeste de Chula Vista desde los 1960's.
Apoyo que se quite del Frente de la Bahia. Sin embargo, el nuevo propuesto
proyecto busca ser aprobada para una cantidad comparable de contaminaci6n.
i Queremos aire mas limpio en el futuro, no el estatus quo! Esta es nuestra (mica
oportunidad para prevenir decadas futuras de contaminaci6n y buscar un futuro
energetico limpio.
Por favor no comefa ofro error de 50 anos.
Exhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que:
. Rechace 1a propuesta para una planta con "conductos de combustIon" de 620MW
. Rechace cualquier opclon que no reduzca la contaminacion a comunidades en direcci6n deFviento
. Requiem energia limpia y renovabJe ademas la conservaci6n como parte del proyecto.
Atentamen\t,", / "\ _
Nombre /I/IIJ, ./JO bRt:.S 0AURE<:9 L{)
,
Domicilio /D3.2 :JC'F~ I? So 10 ,4 (/E
Ciudad r;-V. Est.do.s:...tL.- C6digo Postal 9/9/,/
Teletono (p / q) 1.;/:1.72..7 Jd2orreo Electr6nico
Autonzo que se uti1!ce mi nombre en publico en apoyo de 1a postura anterior. Para mas informacion, cornu.
~i~u:::: ~?n Coalicion de Sa1ud Ambiental (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City,
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s: I support its re-
moval from the Bayftont. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely,
Namej)<, I .;:>A ,.,4 A Je!4-IhJ'''''1
Address {, c..c.. (i_fa .,r.-. J- f'>,~ It-""- _:; t
City r\ h (./Ll4- [,(. If IL> State C 11 Zip ":f /q / I
PhoneJ; '1- 'f d b -) ~ f R'Email~
I give permission to use- my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474.0220, 40J Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval ftorn the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
.. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
JVlJ
c; I Q /(
I give permission to use my name in pub1ic to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Hea1th Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile or Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the I 960s. I support its re-
moval ftorn the Bayfiont. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge tile CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities. ,~
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of ~,
the project.
Sincerely, _ 0
Name ~
Addre
City
Phon
,Jtt.~
I give per sian use my name in publicto support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Hea!th Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950
.;
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I snpport its re-
moval from the Bayftont. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less poIlution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project. u"
-V;"'-
Sincerely,
~~~~f~if;t?'1
~}{~~7.09'7 Email
I give permissIOn to use my name in public to SUPP0l1 the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950
--_._---,--
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s.' I support its re-
moval ftom the Bayftont. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursne a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely,
Name'
Addr 5S
Cit
Phone
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, NatIOnal City, CA 91950
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval from the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fIred power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit signifIcantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Cd;b.fl~
-T'
JUa.r0?--
vi
I give permissIOn to use my name in public to SLlpP011 the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950.
---------------------------------- ---
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the I960s. I support its re-
moval from the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fIred power plant proposal
. Reject aIiyoptions that does not emit signifIcantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely~ / L /'
Name L1.F a...ecz-- .4 /- U /U /J-
Address /il7 9' eo,1-Y'cff,6 0 /f1/
City G <t V . State~ Zip 7'/'7//
Phone iPli-Lj'2b'OSTJ11ail )
I give permission to use my name i~blic to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite ]]0, National City, CA 91950
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval from the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fIred power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit signifIcantly less pollution on
downwind communities. .
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincer~ 0 ( .
Narn ..~~~
Address 10'1:' , {:;w-..>--
City c.... -V ( State~< Zip "tl<f{ \
Phone G, {'f <-(.].;;", [I 4><f Email _
j
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval from the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit signifIcantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
5incere~ V Me..
Name t;
Addre I b
City tate
Phon U> 1 C( )fZV' LS'14Ernail
)
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474M0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950
Sr. Comisionado Geesman:
La actual Planta Energetica de la Bahia Sur es una instalaci6n ineficiente y
anticuada que ha estado contaminando el oeste de Chula Vista desde los 1960's.
Apoyo que se quite del Frente de la Bahia. Sio embargo, el nuevo propuesto
proyecto busca ser aprobada para una cantidad comparable de contamioaci6n.
iQueremos aire mas limpio en el futuro, no el estatus quo! Esta es nuestra (mica
oportunidad para prevenir decadas futuras de contaminaci6n y buscar un futuro
energetico limpio.
Por favor no cornela olro error de 50 arios.
Exhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que:
. Rechace la propuesta para una pJanta con "conductos de combustion" de 620MW
. Rechace cualqUler opcion que no reduzca la contaminacion a comunidades en duecci6n de! viento
. Requiera energia limpia y renovable ademas la conservaci6n como parte del proyecto
Atentamente,
Nombre .}JJ tp'<.17 tV C' u:(h~ s
Domicilio {r>( 7 r;tf<{'4!u t' 4U F
Ciudad (' if,) I J 1/, .,rPl Estado..cJ4..- C6digo Postal '71 yf/
Tele/onc(r;, r'i') Cf?r(J-7,7 -,,/ Correa Electr6nico
./
Autorizo que sc utiiice mi nombre en publico en apoyo de la pos1Ura anterior. Para mas informacion, cornu-
niquese con Coalici6n de SaJud Ambiental (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile or Cars Way, Suite 310, National City,
Sr. Comisionado Geesman:
La actual Planta Energetica de la Bahia Sur es una instaJaci6n ineficiente y
anticuada que ha estado contaminando el oeste de Chula Vista desde los 1960's.
Apoyo que se quite del Frente de la Bahia. Sio embargo, el nuevo propuesto
proyecto busca ser aprobada para una cantidad comparable de contaminaci6n.
iQueremos aire mas limpio en el futuro, no e1 estatus quo! Esta es nuestra (mica
oportunidad para prevenir decadas futuras de contarninaci6n y buscar un futuro
energetico limpio.
Por favor no corneta olro error de 50 arios.
Exhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que:
. Rechace la propuesta para uoa planta con "conductos de combustion" de 620MW.
. Rechace cuaJquier opcion que no reduzca la contaminacion a comunidades en direcci6n del viento
. Requiera energia limpia y renovable ademas la conservacion como parte del proyecto
Atentamente'j \ ,t! _ ~'
Nombre JVCLvl~U\ or, ~1Jf'1
Domicilio \ \S?o -\ \: 0 ve ~ \)
Ciudad <.. V Estado.t..lI: C6digo Postal 9 \ <1 ( (
T eletono <77 '5 0" II Correa Electr6nico )
Autorizo que se utiJice mi nombre en publico en apoyo de la postura anterior. Para mas infonnaci6n, comu-
niquese con Coalicion de Salud AmbientaJ (619) 474~0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City,
Sr. Comisionado Geesman:
La actual Planta Energetica de la Bahia Sur es una instalaci6n ineficiente y
anticuada que ha estado contaminando el oeste de Chula Vista desde los 1960' s.
Apoyo que se quite del Frente de la Bahia. Sin embargo, el nuevo propuesto
proyecto busca ser aprobada para una cantidad comparable de contamioaci6n.
iQueremos aire mas limpio en el futuro, no el estatus quo! Esta es nuestra (mica
oportunidad para prevenir decadas futuras de contamioaci6n y buscar un futuro
energetico limpio.
Por favor no cornela olro error de 50 arios.
Exhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que:
. Rechace la propuesta para una planta con "conductos de combustion" de 620MW
. Rechace cualquier opcJon que no reduzca la contaminaci6n a comunidades en direccion del :viento
. Requiera energia limpia y renovable ademas la conservaci6o como parte del proyecto
j
Atentamente, (_ . (}. OIQ /
Nombre 22J.:t4"...f-"'-fL ~~
Domicilio / rY) ( (') ~ k /"".1 h
Ciudad C' 'J Estado --GLl C6digo Postal q! q II
Teie/ono GJ q- - i..f J.)~ {)fb () ~ Correa Electr6nico
Autorizo que se utiJice mi nombre en publico en apoyo de Ja postura anterior. Para mas infonnaci6n, comu-
oiquese con Coalicion de Salud Ambiental (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City,
CA 91950
--_._._~--'-_.'-'-..
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista sioce the 1960s.'1 support its re-
moval from the Baynon!. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent futUre decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don'l make another 50 year mislake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of I
the project.
Sincerely,
Name
Address
City
Phone . u}'
I give permission to use my name in public to SlIppOrt the above,position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474.0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, NationaJ City, CA 91950
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval ftom the Bayfron!. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
SincereI y,
Name t-~Vlr~ IA~~N~
Address 48 1V10\S. i"'- bf5
City Q{Ui...tT v:i5i/T State Cfr Zip q(9r! .
Phone gS~-0&J-Z7Iq Email M'Shr p-d,j(c,+~VlQy;;t.oo I
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval from the Bayfton!. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge tile CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincer
Name
Addr
City
Phone
j
\re~
I give permission to use my narrie in public to support the above position. For more orm Ion contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310. National City, CA 91950.
r-,-- t _/1.11 _ If !I ____. ,,_
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1 960s. I support its re-
moval ftom the Bayftont. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution Dn
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the p~~~ect. ~ ,
Sincerely, fJ"~T"~
Name (V\CA~::f~Kf"~~
Address ~"\ . s,s 'S~ +- ~
City (',Vt-..J\a. \,);\-'ht- StateCA Zip ~J'I1I
Phone..v I '\)91.(, .5'j 3'b Email ~.$ <\. \ rn ~'L V7Y1C"--\-@ 010' . GO I7J
I give permission to use my name m public to support the above posItion. For more mformation contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474.0220, 401 Mile of Cats Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950
j
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support Its re-
moval from the Bayftont. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval from the Bayrront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don 'I make anolher 50 year mislake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely,
Name VI-J 1& H -r KoEHN
Address \4 'i '5 1'1 ct.,o.l'\ Co \.J 1'-'\
City(.\!V\"p. Vlnl1 State (/I Zip 'fIO;: I ,
Phone Email ~ke~I-\I\,{;J '1 ",h~ (0
I give permissIOn to use my name in public to support the above positiod: For more information contact
Environmental HeaJth Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval from the Bayrront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don 'I make anolher 50 year mislake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
I give permission to use my name in pubJic to support the a ave position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220. 401 Mi!e of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facili'q
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval rrom the Bayrront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don 'I make anolher 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution 'on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely, _ D
Name elt) f'ir~F\/ --Dc; 4) 15 ft.'1
Address ;,);'" / FA.Y"p"'ie Slheel
City J "';7Pt"h0 / .3"-<1< t> State C4 Zip ;,; /' 7 ;;',~
Phone .(....-V/tJ?Y[.;:Email )<"<-iV'~ y wV', -f<".
- / ('"<:'~I
I give permission to use my nam~ in public to support the above posItion. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950
lit
-
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s: I support its re-
moval rrom the Bayrront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades oj
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don 'I make another 50 yeaI' mistake.
I strongly nrge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
I
-
,
Y\
Sincerely,
Name
Address
Ci StateCA ZiP---3..l3.l \. ,
Phone-mail ~O(f\(W.e ~.e.V\~\ i) 'jQ
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more mformation contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been pollutiug western Chula Vista since the 1960s. r support its re-
moval ftom the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fIred power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
_",,'"'r
..jtt..~
SincerelY'M r
Name - t.\.."'v..~( ~a.rc'&t
Address :3 i?q iJcrf(,,~'^-f-c Gt
City $. D, State Cf4 Zip 9V 1'-(
Phone 917'J:jCJ7 Emailt(Jc.f{.{....J...07tG<.Pf~L5Iot.l<.f. ~
I give permission to use my name in public to supP0l1 the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474.0220, 401 Mile of CaTS Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. r support its re-
moval ITom the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo I This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Plea"e don'l make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above' position For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, SUite 310, National City, CA 91950
C\~t..~
,
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. r support its re-
moval ftom the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo I This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely, ()
Name [,'.VY\.t.y".vtdc ~;y-e.:2
Address (\00 \V\&{, 4!'-\-.r,'.J 12\vd (-'24-
City r~AA~V'\h:;. State(~ Zip 919)\
Phone (&,19) "75'-4741 Email 1<.r.1\t1~O.1c.~"..r;
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474~0220, 401 MiJe of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950
--~----
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s.'r support its re-
moval ITom the BaYITont. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo I This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely,
Name~thwt'1 TC1~5 ('QrhC11 C(
Address '5",,-/ -re/~9VfApJ,... {''''....'fr'' f2.d' /fpr F
Gty('I1lA 1"1 v' ,'i,C.... State c~ Zip q i 'U 0
PhonE\'l.f~ gS-c-'-f &')0 Email IV1 r,orhc{(q fi>~<7Ih(;(J.CofVJ
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval from the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Ple~se don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-flIed power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind conrrnunities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely. ,
Name .JV\~-h V\ \~,\\S
Address I q I::' '\ n\\ \ \"'0 o~ A\J'{
Ci~\"",-\\c~\JI.')'+<' StateC ' Zip o\l'i:\~
Phone '\ [0 - '\ '11. ~Email ebloc Ie-de" Co L k€\ih.c+."
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been pollutmg western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval. from the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge tile CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind conrrnunities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely, ~
Name E IZ.j)j5&i1J ~/Il2ilJ ,
Address I/~"')S- L5Ra?dv,&LJ W
City S;R1l;<y-/JJiltJ Statet1'f Zip 9i~
Phone L/,l/) f,~ .Jl.. Email
I~~miSSion 10 use my name in public to support the above position. For more mformation contact
EnVIronmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220,401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 3lO, National City, CA 91950
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval from the Baytront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don '/ make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-flIed power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind conrrnunities. .
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely, I
Name-,'j,__cl_\ "CO\. Co '( co I C.
Addres~clJ jf /Zc.Chca.l A-u-G
City;tw~,c,,;; 'tHr State C~ Zip <1/9SG
Pho / I<<~ - A%Email Yc.YIS'Sflt!k,4-,rv\o:.~
I
I give per on to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval from the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
.J .
n6- 14M
Sincerely,
Name
Addre
Cit
Phcp1e .
I giv~permissi to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmen al Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 9J950 .
~'6 -,~t"
Zip
-<.q
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting westem Chula Vista sinCe the I 960s. I support its re-
moval from the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approval
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fired power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
S~~::IY~ldf' ~ ~~
Address ~/< AN r ~
CityNAT. CITy' State Cff Zip 9/9'50
/
Phone Email
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (6]9) 474-0220, 401 Mile or Cars Way, Suite 310, NationaJ City, CA 9]950
Sr. Comisionado Geesman:
La actual Planta Energetica de la Bahia Sur es una instalacion ineficiente y
anticuada que ha estado contaminando el oeste de Chula Vista desde los 1960's.
Apoyo que se quite del Frente de la Bahia. Sin embargo, el nuevo propuesto
proyecto busca ser aprobada para una cantidad comparable de contaminacion.
iQueremos aire mas limpio en el futuro, no el estatus quo! Esta es nuestra (mica
oportunidad para prevenir decadas futuras de contaminacion y buscar un futuro
energetico \impio.
Par favor no cornela olro error de 50 alios.
Exhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que:
. Rechace la propuesta para una planta con "conductos de combustion" de 620MW
. Rcchace cualquier opcion que no reduzca la contaminacion a comunidades en direcci6n del Vlcnto
. Requiera energia limpia y renovable ademas !a conservaci6n como parte del proyecto
~t~
Atentamente, \ ' ""-- \ ^
Nombre ~ C\ ..J (") r{,'('~h(,) t-\C\)~
Domidlio 67,) \..UOCX)~\..I. iW
CiUd.d~ Estado~C6digopostal q\C{ It>
Teletonl.0 ",)Y76--\ 1) ~ I Correo Electr6nico \ 17100. C~J:,rt>:\L \
'C <' ~" f7\C\i. (011)
Autorizo que se utilice mi nombre en publico en apoyo de la postura antenor, Para mas informacion, cornu-
niquese con Coalicion de Salud Ambiental (619) 474.0220,401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City,
CA 91950
Sr. Comisionado Geesman:
La actual Planta Energetica de la Bahia Sur es una instalacion ineficiente y
anticuada que ha estado contaminando el oeste de Chula Vista desde los 1960's.
Apoyo que se quite del Frente de la Bahia. Sin embargo, el nuevo propuesto
proyecto busca ser aprobada para una cantidad comparable de contaminacion.
i Queremos aire mas \impio en el futuro, no el estatus quo! Esta es nuestra (mica
oportunidad para prevenir decadas futuras de contaminacion y buscar un futuro
energ6tico \impio.
Par favor no cornela olro error de 50 alios.
Exhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que:
. Reehace la propuesta para una planta con "conductos de combustion" de 620MW
. Rechace cualquier opcion que no reduzca la contaminacion a comunidades en direccion de] viento
. Requiera energia limpia y renovable ademas la conservacion como parte del proyecto
'It~
Cmdad 'I. Estado ~ C6dlgo Postal 11iLD
Teletono Correo Electr6nICO~) ~otYnot I ( . C.O~
Autorlzo que se utlhce ml nombre en publico en apoyo de la postura anterior Para mas mformaclOn, comu~
niquese con Coalicion de Salud Ambiental (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City,
...... ,.."rorn
Sr. Comisionado Geesman:
La actual Planta Energetica de la Bahia Sur es una instalacion ineficiente y
anticuada que ha estado contaminando el oeste de Chula Vista desde los 1960's.
Apoyo que se quite del Frente de la Bahia. Sin embargo, el nuevo propuesto
proyecto busca ser aprobada para una cantidad comparable de contaminaci6n.
iQueremos aire mas \impio en el futuro, no el estatus quo! Esta es nuestra (mica
oportunidad para prevenir decadas futuras de contaminacion y buscar un futuro
energetico \impio.
Par favor no cornela olro error de 50 alios.
Exhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que:
. Rechace la propuesta para una planta con "conductos de combustion" de 620MW
. Rechace cualquier opci6n que nOreduzca la contaminacion a comunidades en direcci6n delviento
. Requiem energia limpia y renovable ademas la conservacion como parte del proyccto
Atentam~ t ~ d
Nombre. nV\(F~\Q '"'0 YlfJtJel
Domicilio "1-0 f- OQ I<J a LVn Au f'_ #. A
Ciudad t\r..0lct l)1 c, tct Estado~ C6digo postal.1!jm
tt~
T elefono
CorreD Electr6nico
Autorizo que se utilice mi nombre en publico en apoyo de ]a postura anterior. Para mas informacion, comu-
niquese con Coalicion de Salud Ambiental (619) 474~0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, NationaJ City,
CA 9t950
Sr. Comisionado Geesman:
La actual Planta Energetica de la Bahia Sur es una instalacion ineficiente y
anticuada que ha estado contaminando el oeste de Chula Vista desde los 1960's.
Apoyo que se quite del Frente de la Bahia. Sin embargo, el nuevo propuesto
proyecto busca ser aprobada para una cantidad,comparable de contaminaci6n.
iQueremos aire mas \impio en el futuro, no el estatus quo! Esta es nuestra Unica
oportunidad para prevenir decadas futuras de contaminacion y buscar un futuro
energetico limpio.
Par favor no cornela olro error de 50 alios.
Exhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que:
. Rechace la propuesta para una planta con "conductos de combustion" de 620MW
. Rechace cuaJquier opcion que no reduzca la contaminaci6n a comunidades en direccion del viento .
. Requiera energia limpia y renovab]e ademas la conservacion como parte del proyecto
Atentarnen~' '-
Nombre _\ €.vn GrCle'l . ? () I nfY) 11'1 ?)
Domidlio:.1 S 2::> f)o K.\c-.u. H\ Q iIG ~ f C
Ciudac(V\U\&>- \J\~EstadoC.q( C6di90;ostal q!1/D
Telefono0.::fj I Cj bL.{ Correo Electr6nico
.t~~
Autorizo que se utilice ml nombre en publico en apoyo de la postura anterior. Para mas informacion, comu.
~i~u;~~;:?n Coalicion de Sa]ud Ambiental (619) 4 74~0220, 40 I Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, Nationa] City,
Sr. Comisionado Geesman:
La actual Planta Energetica de la Bahia Sur es una instalacion ineficiente y
anticuada que ha estado contaminando el oeste de Chula Vista desde los 1960's,
Apoyo que se quite del Frente de la Bahia, Sin embargo, el nuevo propuesto
proyecto busca ser aprobada para una cantidad comparable de contaminacion,
iQueremos aire mas limpio en el futuro, no el estatus quo! Esta es nuestra (mica
Jportunidad para prevenir decadas futuras de contaminacion y buscar un futuro
~nergetico limpio
Por favor no cornela olro error de 50 afios,
Exhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que:
. Rechace la propuesta para una planta con "conductos de combustion" de 620MW
. Rechace cualquicr opcian que no reduzca la contaminaci6n a comunidades en direcci6n del viento
. Requiera energia limpia y renovable ademas 1a conservaci6n como parte del proyecto
A~:~~~ente/ipfdJI2 roAHA <--;
Domicilio 1,{.,{-, (f J(y'Jcl\ 10 u..)V'\ A- (/
Ciudad r1r dll II (;If+ Estado CN C6digo Postal C)rq(/
Teletono 1:(.1-5 - IS d- \ Correa Electr6nico
Autorizo que se utilice ml nombre en publico en apoyo de la postura anterior. Para mas informacion, cornu-
niquese con Coalici6n de Salud Ambienta] (619) 474-0220, 40J Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City,
~. -. ~ ~ ~
_____._________~_._________ n___
-----_._------,-.~----,~~
Sr. Comisionado Geesman:
La actual Planta Energetica de la Bahia Sur es una instalacion ineficiente y
anticuada que ha estado contaminando el oeste de Chula Vista des de los 1960's,
Apoyo que se quite del Frente de la Bahia, Sin embargo, el nuevo propuesto
proyecto busca ser aprobada para una cantidad comparable de contaminacion,
i Queremos aire mas limpio en el futuro, no el estatus quo! Esta es nuestra (mica
oportunidad para prevenir decadas futuras de contaminacion y buscar un futuro
energetico limpio,
Por favor no cornela olro error de 50 afios,
Exhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que:
. Rechace la propuesta para una planta con "conductos de combusti6n" de 620MW
. Rechace cualquier opcion que no reduzca la contaminacion a comunidades en direcci6n del viento
. Requiem energia limpia y renovable ademas la conservaci6n como parte del proyecto
Domidlio
Atentamen
Nombre
Ciudad
Teletono ic~<8~
stado c.it- C6diga postal~
Correa Electr6nico
Autorizo que se utilice mi nombre en publico en apoyo de la postura anterior. Para mas informacion, comu-
niquese con Coalicion de Salud Ambiental (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City,
Sr. Comisionado Geesman:
La actual Planta Energetica de la Bahia Sur es una instalacion ineficiente y
anticuada que ha estado contaminando el oeste de Chula Vista desde los 1960's,
Apoyo que se quite del Frente de la Babia Sin embargo, el nuevo propuesto
proyecto busca ser aprobada para una cantidad comparable de contaminacion,
iQueremos aire mas limpio en el futuro, no el estatus quo! Esta es nuestra Unica
oportunidad para prevenir decadas futuras de contaminacion y buscar un futuro
energetico limpio,
Por favor no cornela olro error de 50 afios,
Exhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que:
. Rechace la propuesta para una planta con "conductos de combustion" de 620MW
. Rechace cualquier opeian que no reduzca la contaminaclon a comunidades en dlreecion del 'viento .
. Requiera energia Jimpia y renovable ademas la conservacion como parte del proyecto
Atentamente,t;' , ~
Nombre J' r/~ c;rrue;:.
Domicilio 1r7 b,()y11 ftve, if. ,13
Ciudad fl'huIt<.I//$ " Estado tic!. C6dlgo Postal q{q(O
t!t~
Telefono
Correo Electr6nico
Autorizo que se utilice mi nombre en pubJico en apoyo de \a postura anterior. Para mas informaci6n, comu-
niquese con Coalicion de Sa\ud Ambiental (619) 474~0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City,
CA 91950
-.- ~--- -----_...._.~
Sr. Comisionado Geesman:
La actual Planta Energetica de la Bahia Sur es una instalacion ineficiente y
anticuada que ha estado contaminando el oeste de Chula Vista oesde los 1960's,
Apoyo que se quite del Frente de la Bahia, Sin embargo, el nuevo propuesto
proyecto busca ser aprobada para una cantidad comparable de contaminacion,
iQueremos' aire mas limpio en el futuro, no el estatus quo! Esta es nuestra Unica
oportunidad para prevenir decadas futuras de contaminacion y buscar un futuro
energetico limpio,
Por favor no cornela olro error de 50 afios.
Exhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que:
. Rechace la propuesta para una planta con "conductos de combustion" de 620MW
. Rechace cualquier opci6n que no reduzca la contaminaci6n a comunidades en direcci6n del viento
. ReqUlera energia limpia y renovable ademas la conservaci6n como parte del proyecto
DomidIio
Ciudad
Telefono -4l:7.;;/J/G)
Correa Electr6nico
Autorizo que se utilice mi nombre en publico en apoyo de la postura anterior, Para mas informacion, comu-
niquese con Coalici6n de Salud Ambiental (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City,
;r. Comisionado Geesman:
La actual Planta Energetica de la Bahia Sur es una instalaci6n ineficiente y
IIlticuada que ha estado contaminando el oeste de Chula Vista desde Ios 1960's.
"poyo que se quite del Frente de la Bahia. Sin embargo, eI nuevo propuesto
,royecto busca ser aprobada para una cantidad comparable de contaminaci6n.
Queremos aire mas limpio en el futuro, no el estatus quo! Esta es nuestra (mica
'portunidad para prevenir decadas futuras de contaminaci6n y buscar illl futuro
mergetico limpio.
Por favor no cornela olro error de 50 anos.
<:xhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que:
. Rechace !a propuesta para una planta con "conductos de combustIon" de 620MW
. Rechace cualquier opci6n que no rcduzca la contaminaci6n a comunidades en direccion del viento .
. Requiera energia Jimpia y renovable ademas la conservaci6n como parte del proyecto
\tentamente, 'R J
Nombre -II) U
..~t~~
I .~
E. !:;Jr.lvCiO
IA/rJnd/wvVl AVF Ap/..1'9
Ciudad (lhvl", V/',)(.( EstadoLlLc6digoPostal 9,y/tJ
T eletono .. /a {; - 6 :S ::L 9 Correa Electr6nico
Domicilio 5L/c:,
Autorizo que se utihee mi nombre en publico en apoyo de la postura anterior. Para mas informacion, comu-
niquesc con Coalici6n de Salud AmbientaJ (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City,
CA 91950
-----------
-------._-~
Sr, Comisionado Geesman: .
La actual Planta Energetica de la Bahia Sur es ooa instalaci6n ineficiente y
allticuada que ha estado contaminando el oeste de Chula Vista desde los 1960' s.
Apoyo que se quite del Frente de la Bahia. Sin embargo, el nuevo propuesto
proyecto busca ser aprobada para ooa cantidad comparable de cOlltaminaci6n.
iQueremos aire mas limpio en el futuro, no el estatlls quo! Esta es nuestra (mica
oportunidad para prevenir decadas futuras de contaminaci6n y buscar un futuro
energetico limpio.
Por favor no cornela olro error de 50 anos.
Exhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que:
. Rechace la propuesta para una planta con "conductos de combustion" de 620MW
. Rechace cualquier opcion que no reduzca la contaminacion a comunidades en direcci6n deJ viento
. Requiera energia limpia y renovable ademas la conservacion como parte del proyecto.
Atentamente,
Nombre 12....~ \.\.-t. 'rr-;SOI\
Domicilio S-::;;-O U.o...rll'""'\o... '?o.--rloO-Uo"y
Ciudad C-\'v""" \J i 'St",-
Estado cA C6digo Postal q I OJ 10
Teletono
Correo Electr6nico
Autorizo que se utilice mi nombre en pilblico en apoyo de \a postura anterior Para mas informacion, comu-
mquese con Coalicion de Salud Ambiental (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City,
Sr, Comisionado Geesman:
La actual Planta Energetica de 1a Bahia Sur es una instalaci6n ineficiente y
anticuada que ha estado contaminando el oeste de Chula Vista desde los 1960's.
Apoyo que se quite del Frente de la Bahia. Sin embargo, el nuevo propuesto
proyecto busca ser aprobada para una cantidad comparable de contaminaci6n.
iQueremos aire mas limpio en e] futUro, no el estatus quo! Esta es nuestra (mica
oportunidad para prevenir decadas futuras de contaminaci6n y buscar un futuro
energetico linlpio.
Porfavor no cornela olro error de 50 anos.
Exhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que:
. Rechace la propuesta para una planta con "conductos de combustion" de 620MW
. Rechace cualquier opcion que no reduzca la contaminacion a comunidades en direccion del viento .
. Requiera energia limpJa y renovable ademas la conservaci6n como parte del proyecto.
Atentamente, I A
Nombre t:::IOi~ In
Domicilio t ~~. .;....
tt~.~
(\ VII"').')
F'::.>-t
Ciudad C." c;
-" (", Estado CGi C6digo Postal q I"; 0
Telefono
Correa Electr6nico
Autorizo que se utiJice 011 nombre en publico en apoyo de la postura anterior. Para mas informacion, comu~
niquese con Coalicion de Salud Ambiental (619) 474.0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City,
CA 91950
---- ----------
--.----
Sr. Comisionado Geesman:
La actual Planta Energetica de la Bahia Sur es una instalaci6n ineficiente y
anticuada que ha estado contaminando el oeste de Chula Vista 'desde los 1960's.
Apoyo que se quite del Frente de la Bahia. Sin embargo, el nuevo propuesto
proyecto busca ser aprobada para lUla cantidad comparable de contaminaci6n.
iQlleremO& aire mas limpio en el futuro, no el estatus quol Esta es nuestra (mica
oportunidad para prevenir decadas futuras de contaminaci6n y buscar un futuro
energetico limpio.
Por favor no cornela olro error de 50 anos.
Exhorto urgentemente a la CEC para que:
. Reehace la propuesta para una planta con "conductos de combustion" de 620M\V
. Rechace cualquier opcion que no reduzca 1a contaminacion a comunidades en direccion del viento
. Requiera energia limpia y renovable ademas la conservacion como parte del proyecto.
Atentamente,). /
Nombre ...." ./ I 1~-(Z0
.... '
Ii cl/-c^,_
u.~
Jt';~
Ciudad
o
Ii.'" Estado~ C6digoPostal
l..f22-G<{""'J 9
"
r1'l9'l/
T ehHono
Correo Electr6nico
Autorizo que se utilice mi nombre en publico en apoyo de la postura anterior, Para mas informacion, comu-
niquese con Caalici6n de Salud Ambiental (619) 474.0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City,
,... ~ ...., ("",
Dear Commissioner Geesman:
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility
that has been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. I support its re-
moval trom the Bayfront. However, the new proposed project seeks approvaJ
to emit a comparable amount of pollution. We want cleaner air in the future,
not the status quo! This is our only opportunity to prevent future decades of
pollution and pursue a clean energy future.
Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
I strongly urge the CEC to :
. Reject the current 620MW duct-fIred power plant proposal
. Reject any options that does not emit significantly less pollution on
downwind communities.
. Require clean, renewable energy and conservation as part of
the project.
Sincerely, n
Name )/II-rt€ /&/11 ~ (;j,~~>; .
Address J DO k.lC>D::D L LV V -:-#7'/
City ChuL,q V;5t" State C--f' Zip C( I q 1(')
Phon~ Email
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474.0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, SUIte 310, National City, CA 91950.
\tt,~
Dear Commissioners of the Port of San Diego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that has
been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. There are thousands of people and
numerous schools in the area immediately downwind of the power plant. I understand
that negotiations are currently underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polluting
power plont near the same place. This is an opportunity to prevent decades of pollution
and pursJ,le a clean energy future. Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
Commissioners, please: .
. Develop an energy replacement strategy with input trom the City and the public.
. Adopt an energy strategy that relies on development of clean, renewable energy and
conservation
. If a small replacement power plant is needed, it should be air cooled and air pollution
impacts should not threaten neighboring residents or schools.
. .
,tl~
Sincerely
Name .
Address
Ci State ZipCf/710
Phon~'~iq~-7Ui Email C!h.......-.r&k/.~
. .. . (~~) bl' th b "F . '-~ tact
I gtve pemusston to use tar name m pu IC to support e a Dve poSition. or more ID!l.JJ..Il1GI.IOD con
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220. 401 Mile orCars Way, Suite 310. National City, CA 91950.
----
Dear Commissioners ofthe Port of San Diego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that has
been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. There are thousands of people and
numerous schools in the area immediately downwind of the power plant. I understand ,
that negotiations are currently underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polluting
power plant near the same place. This is an opportunity to prevent decades of pollution
and pursue a clean energy future. Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
Commissioners, pleaSe:
. Develop an energy replacement strategy with input ftom the City and the public.
. Adopt an ei1ergy strategy that relies on development of clean, renewable energy and
conservation
. If a small replacement power .plant is needed, it should be air cooled and air pollution
impacts should not threaten neighboring residents or schools.
Sincerely, . . .
~....................
~::s/ _-~ ''';,': -'"~1 .:'. 'C~ i
City<SHVI Die~J"> State CA Zip '1Z154
Phone 4<::13-8312. Email zoC"'_~CPy",hO(.>'U>'4
. "
'tl
tt~.,
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (6t9) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Soite 310, National City, CA 91950.
Dear Commissioners of the Port of San Diego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that bas
been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. There are thousands of people and
numerous schools in the area immediately downwind of the power plant. I understand
that negotiations are currently underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polluting
power plant near the same place. This is an opporturtity to prevent decades of pollution
and pursue a clean energy future. Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
Commissioners, please:
. Develop an energy replacement strategy with input ftom the City and the public.
. Adopt an energy strategy that relies on development of clean, renewable energy and
conservation
. If a small replacement power plant is needed, it should be air cooled and air pollution
impacts should not threaten neighboring residents or schools.
.S=~f
City t' State Zip 9('7,'#'
Phone Email
,fi ~..
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars W",!, Suite 310, National City, CA 9t950.
------_._---~---
Dear Commissioners of the Port of San Diego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that has
been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. There are thousands of people and
numerous schools in the area immediately downwind of the power plant. I understand
that negotiations are currently underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
Plant I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polluting
power plant near the same place, This is an opporturtity to prevent decades of pollution
and pursue a clean energy future. Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
Commissioners, please:
. Develop an energy replacement strategy with input ftom the City and the public.
. Adopt an energy strategy that relies on development of clean, renewable energy and
conservation
. If a small replacement power plant is needed, it should be air cooled and air pollution
impacts should not threaten neighboring residents or schools.
S~~:~
City (]..AI' StateGq- Zip ql9uD
Phone Email
ftt~
I give pennission to use my naine in public to support the above position. For more infoonation cootact
EnviromnentaJ Health Coalition (619)474-0220. 401 M'deofCars Way. Suite3JO. NationaJ Citv. CA Q1Q'\fI
Dear Commissioners of tbe Port of San Diego,
Tbe existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility tbat bas
been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. There are thousands of people and
numerous scbools in the area immediately downwind of the power plant. I understand
that negotiations are currently underway to decide the future of the South Bay Powet<:
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat- ,
egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polIutinf
power Plant near the same place. This is an opportunity to prevent decades of polIution
and Plmlue a clean energy future. Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
Commissioners, please:
. Develop an energy replacement strategy with input from the City and the public.
. Adopt an energy strategy that reJies on development of clean., renewable energy and
conservation
. If a small replacement power plant is needed, it should be air cooled and air pollution
impacts should not threaten neighboring residents or schools.
",'
tt~
Sincerely,
Name
Address
City. '- J,
Phoneivl'i 4"'~ --?'')'-{G'
Stateel"c Zip Cj /4 J I
Email <;0 1_ ~pl-z..Q~"+,,,".ICb""
Dear Commissioners of tbe Port of San Diego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that has
been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. There are thousands of people and
numerous schools in the area immediately downwind of the power plant. I understand
that negotiations are currently underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polIuting
power plant near the same place. This is an opportunity to prevent decades of pollution
and pursue a clean energy future. Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
CommissioDe~ please:
. Develop an energy replacement strategy with input ftom the City and the public.
. Adopt an energy strategy that relies on development of clean. renewable energy and
conservation
. If a small replacement power plant is needed, it should be air cooled and air pollution
impacts should not threaten neighboring residents or schools.
SinCel~~
~=ss .""~~r"""'{'
City CJ1L l) ,..-1!z State <::-
Phol!e Email
({~
ZlP'fI"'>I'
ttt.~
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619)474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310. National City, CA 91950.
j' .1 give permission to use my name in public to support the above position.. For more inti ion contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619)474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310 onal City, CA 91950.
----~-
Estimados Miembros de la Comisi6n del Puerto de San Diego,
La actualplanta de energfa de la Bahia Sur es una instalaci6n anticuada e ineficiente la cual
ha contaminado la parte occidente de Chula Vista desde 105 moo sesentas. Hay miles de personas
y bastantes escuelas que se encuenttan en direccion del viento de Ja planta. Tengo entendido que
se eslan llevando a cabo negociaciones para decidir el futuro de la planta y en base de eslo les
insto, a ustedes 105 Comisionados del Puerto, a que desarrollen una estrategia para reemplazar la
energia la cual contenga la eliminacion de la actual planta sin reemplazarla con otra igual en las
zonas cercanas. Esta es una oportunidad para la prevencion de decadas de contaminacion y se-
guir en busca de un futmo con energia limpia. Eviten un error que dure Otr08 50 ano8.
Miembro de la Comisi6n:
. Desarrollen una estrategia que reemplace energia tomando en cuenta a la Ciudad y las
opiniones de! publico
. Adopten una es:trategia de energia que cuente con el desarrollo de energia limpia, reno-
vable y conservacion
. Si es necesario el reemplazo de' esta planta con otra pequefta, entonces les pedimos que
cuente con la tecnologfa de enfiiamiento por aire y que 105 impactos del aile contamina-
do no amenacen la salud de 105 residentes vecinos ni a Jos estudiantes de las escuelas.
~t.~
\tentament
Nombre
Direcci6n
Ciudad .
Telefono
",L
.( .
Es 0 rJ\ C6digo Postal
Correo-electr6nico
Autorizo eI 1150 de mi nombre en pdlUco como apoyo a la postura meocionada en 1& parte superi<<. Para mas infurmac' quese
coola Coalici6n de SaludAmbiemal al (619) 414-0220. 401 Mile of Cars Way. Suite 310, National City. CA 91950.
Dear Commissioners oftbe Port of San D.iego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that has
been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. There ate thousands of people and
numerous schools in the area immediately downwind of the power plant. I understand
that negotiations are currently underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polluting
power plant near the same place. This is an opportunity to prevent decades of pollution
and pursue a clean energy future. Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
COlDmissioners, please.:
. Develop an energy replacement stnW:gy with input ftom the City and the public.
. Adopt an energy strategy that relies on development of clean, renewable energy and
conservation
. If a small replacement power plant is needed, it should be air cooled and air pollution
impacts should not threaten neighboring residents or schools.
Sincere~y,... "'.",C,,,.... .', ...R.E;EIVED MAR 16
Name _~c_."
Address - . ,,(... /'~
City ( [/ [.0 f/f~ l-a: State r; 4 Zip q '~/C> ~
Phone Email
1 give permission to use my name in t'!l~~to. support the above ~!!.lQl\'~E~;:~.".,.,~fOnnati contact
Enviroomenlal Health CoaIitioo (619)47i1ctmO. 401 Mile orc"," ~Uli<fJIO; Natiooal itv. CA 91950:
- - -----
#
v
'Dear Commissioners of tbe Port of San Diego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that has
been polluting western Chula Vista since the I 960s. There are thousands of people and
numerous schools in the area immediately downwind of the power plant. I understand
that negotiations are currently underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polluting
power plant near the same place. This is an opportunity to prevent decades of pollution
and pursue a clean energy future. Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
Commissioners, please:
. Develop an energy replacement strategy with input ftom the City and the public.
. Adopt an energy strategy that relies on velopment of clean. renewable energy and
conservation
. If a small replacement power pi needed, it should be air cooled and air pollution
impacts should not threaten nei boring residents or schools.
Sincerely,
Name
Addre
City 1""" ~,< Zip q>\~'"i
Phone -- Email €.v\tI\..Of....tw\It..\..\.~.\n.dv~t&:>>vlQ..Nt~I.tol.l.
e."'v..."V\......w,.,\tt~"-...o\~1. ~c.'Q5""...,. c.."'"
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
EnvironmentaJ Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 40] Mile orCars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950.
){/- :;we..
+tt~
---------
-----
Dear Commissioners of the Port of San Diego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that has
been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. There are thousands of people and
numerous schools in the area immediately downwind of the power plant. I understand
.-
that negotiations are currently underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
),1Y that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polluting
f1illwer plant near the same place. This is an opportunity to prevent decades of pollution
""'d pursue a clean energy future. Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
.~ommissioDers, please:
~ Develop an energy replacement strategy with input &om the City and the public.
. Adopt an energy strategy that relies on development of clean, renewable energy and
.... conservation
. If a small replacement power plant is needed, it should be air cooled and air pollution
impacts should not threaten neighboring residents or schools.
~incerelY,
Name
Address (
City L.... - -b-. State G;4-- ZI q l '1 r S-
Phone-z.,Q')-?'1'?" \ Email {;tGOV1?.JD'Z. eCoj<" """,'r-
~ I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Envirmunental Health Cnalition (619) 474.0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Snite 310, National City, CA 91950*
+tt~
JJear CommiSSIoners 0'- tile Port 0'- San Diego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that has
been polluting western ChuJa Vista since the 196Os. There are thousands of people and
numerous schools in the area immediately downwind of the power plant. I understand
that negotiations are currently underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polluting
power plant near the same place. This is an opportunity to prevent decades of pollution
and p= a clean energy future. Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
Commissioners, please: .
. Develop an energy replacement strategy with input tram the City and the public.
. Adopt an energy strategy that relies on development of clean, renewable energy and
conservation
. If a small replacement power plant is needed, it should be air cooled and air pollution
impacts should not threaten nei oring residents or schools.
.~ I
t.t~
v......D /
State ('A. Zip q;; I \
Email !A~ 1./\ tIlaid 9i1vtlhil''/, CbM.
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way. Suite 310, NationaJ City, CA 91950.
-.---.._._---
Dear Commissioners of the Port of San Diego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that has
been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. There are thousands of people and
numerous schools in the area immediately downwind of the power plant. I understand
that negotiations are currently underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polluting
power plant near the same place. This is an opportunity to prevent decades of pollution
and pursue a clean energy future. Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
Commissione~ please:
. Develop an energy replacement strategy with input ftom the City and the public.
. Adopt an energy strategy that relies on development of clean. renewable energy and
conservation
. If a small replacement power, plant is needed, it should be air cooled and air pollution
impacts should not threaten neighboring residents or schools.
~' , .,
Sincerely,
,--
Name
Address
City
Phone
tt,~
-,
State Zip ~J~
Email-ji:rJI...c..OM..
1 give permission to use my e in public to support 1he above position. For more information contact
tioo (619)47~220, 401 MileofCaIS Way, Suite 310, Natiooai City, CA 9t950.
Dear Commissioners of the Port of San Diego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that has
been polluting western Chula Vista since the 196Os. There are thousands of people and
numerous schools in the area immediately downwind of the power plant. I understand
that negotiations are currently underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polluting
power plant near the same place. This is an opportunity to prevent decades of pollution
and pursue a clean energy future. Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
Commissioners, please:
. Develop an energy replacement strategy with input trom the City and the public. I
. Adopt an energy strategy that relies on development of clean, renewable energy and
conservation
. If a small replacement power plant is needed, it should be air cooled and air pollution
impacts should not threaten neighboring residents or schools.
it, ~.
C)\- Zip 7,a II) 1
fl{){f"../lxfJ..oL. co~
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950.
-----.-------
Dear Commissioners of the Port of San Diego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that has
been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. There !Ire thousands of people and
numerous schools in the area immediately downwind ofthe power plant. I understand
that negotiations are currently underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polluting
power plant near the same place. This is an opportunity to prevent decades of pollution
and pursue a clean energy future. Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
Com.m.issioners, please:
. Develop an energy replacement strategy with inpnt ftom the City and the public.
. Adopt an energy strategy that relies on development of clean, renewable energy and
conservation
::s;: . If a small replacement power plant is needed, it should be air cooled and air pollution
-..;;;;;. impacts should not threaten neighboring residents or &chools.
~incerelY
~ Name
-\;:r Addr s
City ,
Phone
I give pennissioo to use my name in public to support the above position. For more informatioo. contact
Enviroomental Heal1h Coalition (6t9) 474-0220, 401 Mile OfCaIS Way, Suite 310, National Ciry, CA 91950. ~
Dear Commissioners of the Port of San Diego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that has
been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. There are Ihousands of people and
numerous schools in the area immediately downwind of the / wer plant. I understand
that negotiations are currently underway to decide the fu e of the South Bay Power
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to devel an energy replacement strat-
egy that.tears down the current plant but does not repl e it with another large polluting
power plant near the same place. This is an oppo . ty to prevent decades of pollution
and pursue a clean energy future. Please don't ma another 50 year mistake.
Commissioners, please:
. Develop an energy replacement strategy ith input Horn the City and the public.
. Adopt an energy strategy that reJies 0 Gevelopment of clean, renewable energy and
conservation
. If a small replacement power pi is needed, it should be air cooled and air pollution
impacts shOldd not ~aten ne' boring residents or schools.
\!~,
Sincerely,
Name
Address
City
Phone
It, ~_
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Heatth Coatition (6]9)474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, Natiooat City, CA 91950.
JJear commiSsIoners of tbe Port of San Diego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an ine~~ ~cY ~Jf.Icit~lWat has
been polluting western Chula Vista since the 196Os. There are thousands of people and
numerous schools in the area immediately downwind of the power plant. I understand
that negotiations are currently underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polluting
power plant near the same place. This is an opportunity to prevent decades of pollution
and pllmle a clean energy future. Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
Commissioners, please:
. Develop an energy replacement strategy with input trom the City and the public.
. Adopt an energy strategy that relies on development of clean. renewable energy and
conservation
. If a small replacement pnwer p
impacts 0 Id ottbre ten n
Sincerely,
Name_
Address
City_
Phone
tt.~
. d, it should be air cooled and air pnllution
idents or schools.
ciiuUi~ 6A9t911
Email
Zip
I give pennission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310. Natiooal City, CA 91950.
-----.-
---------~
Dear Commissioners of the Port of Sa&Jliego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that has
been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. There are thousands of people and
numerous schools in the area immediately downwind of the power plant. I understand
that negotiations are currently underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polluting
power plant near the same place. This is an opportunity to prevent decades of pollution
and pursue a clean energy future. Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
Commissioners, please:
. Develop an energy replacement straIegy with input ftom the City and the public.
. Adopt an energy strategy that re~Aevelopment of clean, renewable energy and
conservation
.. If a small replacement power, plant is needed. it should be air cooled and air pollution
impacts should not threaten neighborin~ residents or schools.
RhEIVED MAR 162006
SNincerel~ti~'i~'~"..".>>..,!;,,:,.,"rf:;"_""<j";""";."~" A%l. ji:;~,,,,,,.,..".'~ /'
ame "t:~-".;r-~o-'4-'~';liW~,j~1':...~~.(G.::2
Address I;;II$'7 '2) ,=,,>;::-;r.,cc' .
City (i,/,/~; {,);;C~ State(~ I Zip '}rlto
Phone Email
tt,~
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Enviroamental Health Coalition (619) 47~220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite3JO, National City, CA 91950.
Estimados Miembros de la Comision del Puerto de San Diego,
La actual planta de energia de la Bahia Sur es una instalaci6n anticuada e ineficiente la cual
ba contaminado la par1e occidente de Chula Vista desde Ius anus sesentas. Hay miles de personas
y bastantes escuelas que se encuentran en direcci6n del viento de la planta. Tengo entendido que
se estan llevando a cabo negociaciones para decidir eI futuro de la planta y en base de esto les
insto, a ustedes los Comisionados del Puerto, a que desarrollen una estrategia para reemplazar la
energia la cual contenga la eliminaci6n de la actual planta sin reemplazarla con o1ra igual en las
zonas cercanas. Esta es una oportunidad para la prevenci6n de decadas de contaminaci6n y se-
guir en busca de un futuro con energia Jimpia. Eviten un error que dure otros 50 alios.
Miembro de Ia ComisiOn:
. Desarrollen una estrategia que reempiace energfa tomando en cuenta a)a Ciudad y l,\s
opiniones,del publico
. Adopten una estrategia de energia que cuente con el desarrollo de energia limpia, reno-
vable y conservaci6n
. Si es necesario el reemplazo de esta planta con otra pequefia. entonces les: pedimos que
cuente con la tecnologia de enfriamiento por aire y que IDS impactos del 'aire contamina-
do no amenacen la salud de 10s residentes vecinos ni a los estudiantes de las escuelas.
~
IJentamente
Nombre
Direcci6n
Ciudad 0
T elefon
utff ~~
ado (! /h C6digo Postal &oj I"l' II
o-electr6nico
A1Korizo el usa de mi nombre eo .co como apoyo a lapostura me.ocionada en laparte superior. Para mas infurmaci6ncomuniquese
con 18 CoaIici6nde Salud AmbieJllal a:I (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 3]0, National City, CA 91950.
"-/ Zz- /Lf33
--.----- -_-._-"---- ..---..---- - ----.--.-- ----- ---.-- '-
Dear Commissioners of tbe Port of San Diego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that has
been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. There'are thousands of people and
numerous schools in the area immediately downwind of the power plant. I understand
that negotiations are currently underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polluting
power plant near the same place, This is an opportunity to prevent decades of pollution
and pursue a clean energy future. Please-don't make another 50 year mistake.
Commissioners, please:
. Develop an energy replacement strategy with input ftom tbe City and the public.
. Adopt an energy strategy that relies -on development of clean, renewable energy and
conservation
. If a small replacement pnwer plant is needed, it should be air cooled and air pnllution
impacts should Dot threaten neighboring residents or schools.
Sincerely,
Name
Address
City
Phone
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more infonnation contact:
Enviromneatal Health Coalition (619) 47~220, 401 Mile ofC"", Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950.
------- -- ._-... ............ .....A... .......I~5U'
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that has
been poUuting western Chula Vista since the'1960s. There are thousands of people and
numerous schools in the area immediately downwind of the power plant. I understand
that negotiations are currently underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polluting
power pl;w.t near the satne place. This is an opportunity to prevent decades of pollution
and pursye a clean energy future. Please<i<m 't make another 50 year mistake.
Commissioners, pJease:
. Develop an energy replacement strategy with input fi'om the City and the public.
. Adopt an energy strategy that relies on.rlevelopment of clean, renewable energy and
conservation
. If a small replacement power plant is needed, it sbould be air cooled and air pollution
impacts should not threaten neighboring residents or schools.
. I RECEIVED MAR 16200
Smcere y,
Name {}'l-/)J;'~><-<r_ mcu'. ~.
Address f' t5 ~ 1:< />/ ~ ;;>
CityCJbl.a> {f.' State Cfl. Zip 9/9/<:c
Phone Email
ttf~
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-<>220,401 Mile .fCars Way, Suite 310, Natiooal City, CA 91950.
_.~---._.-~_..---_.- -
- ~_....--------
Dear Commissioners ofthe Port of San Diego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an ih~fficient and outdated facility that has
bee~ polluting western Chula Vista since the I 960s. There are thousands of people and
numerous schools in the area immediately downwind of the power plant. I understand
that negotiations are currently underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
PI!ij1I. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polluting
power plant near the satneplaoe. This is an opporturtityto prevent decades ofpollution
and pursue a clean energy future. Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
Commissioners, please:
. Develop an energy replacement strategy with input fi'om the City and the public.
. Adopt an energy strategy that relies on development of clean, renewable energy and
conservation
. If a small replacement power plant is needed, it sbould be air cooled and air pollution
impacts shonld not threaten mbEjVEDi~AW '2 tZOO6
>incerely,<;
Name .JH-f..<'-v
llddress ~7.j
City(':--'j.<~.l"--..' I.'~.
Phone 9-:",
,t, ,.
t1,""
;l//!-;-
/--i,-/'l<!j
State (i.f Zip 'Ii";;;,
Email
I give permission to lise my name in public to support die above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950.
Dear Commissioners of the Port of San Diego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that has
been polluting weslern Chula Vista since the I 960s. There are thousands of people and
numerous schools in the area immediately downwind of the power plant. I understand
that negotiations are currently underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polluting
power plant near the Satne place. This is an opportunity to prevent decades of pollution
and pursue a clean energy future. Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
Commissioners, pJease:
. Develop an energy replacement strategy with input ftom the City and the public.
. Adopt an energy strategy that relies on development of cl~ renewable energy and
conservation
. If a small replacement power plant is needed, it should be air cooled and air pollution
impacts should not threaten nei boring residents or schools.
'tti.~
Sincerely, .
Name
llddress
City Chu.C.a. VJ'Sh State ('A Zip q/1 i I
Phone Email Ig i'J iLn @ cn v n e. i-
f give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619)474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950.
-- ----~---~~-------
:;0
JT1
"
JT1
<:
JT1
c::>
:;;::
)>
=
.....
"'"
~
--~'- --,~--------- -.. -
Dear Commissioners of the Port of San Diego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that has
been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. There are thousands of people and
numerous schools in the area .immediately downwind of the power plant. I understand
that negotiations are currently underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polluting
power plant near the satne place. This is an opporturtity to prevent decades of pollution
and pursue a clean energy future. Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
Commissioners, pJease:
. Develop an energy replacement strategy with input trom the City and the public.
. Adopt an energy strategy that relies on development of clean, renewabJe energy and
conservation
. !fa smaU replacement power plant is needed., it should be air cooled and air pollution
impacts should not threaten neighboring residents or schools.
ttt~
Sincerely, .
Name :jt'\.'\,i \ L':
Address
City
Phone
RE[~'VED MAR 232006
0..,\"........2"'"
Zip C\ PI \ 0
I give permissioo to use my name in public to suppon the above position. For more informatioo. cmtact
Environmental Health Coalition (619)474-<>220. 401 Mile of Cars Way. Suite 310. National Cirv. CA 91",0
""fO;iU' ......U.uuu,S.nuuen; 01 IDe ron 01 ~aD mego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that has
been polluting western Chula Vista since the 19605. There are thousands of people and
numerous schools in the area immediately downwind of the power plant. I understand
that negotiations are currently underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polluting
power p\aJIt near the same place. This is an opportunity to prevent decades of pollution
and pu~ue a clean energy future. Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
Commissioners, please:
. Develop an energy replacement strategy with input trom the City and the public.
. Adopt an energy strategy that relies on development of clean, renewable energy and
conservation
. If a small replacement power plant is needed, it should be air cooled and air pollution
impacts should not threaten neighboring residents or schools.
Ct .
\ .
tt ......
Sincerely, /fA RECEIVED MAR 232006
Name Ffic i)rJe./ if "/;,1
Address 2- .
City LI1..I" ,Jfa tate ell Zip fl'jift
Phone 6tf C/Z:Z- U6 Email /)}5',/QU>1 ~ c.?,K...Yld
-'J
1 give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220. 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950.
---~ ------------~~-~-
Dear Commissione..,. ofthe Port of San Diego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that has
been polluting western Chula Vista since the 19605. There are thousands of people and
numerous schools in the area immediately downwind of the power plant. I understand
that negotiations are currently underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polluting
power plant near the same place. This is an opportunity to prevent decades of pollution
and pursue a clean energy future. Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
Commissioners, please:
. Develop an energy replacement strategy with input :!Tom the City and the public.
. Adopt an energy strategy that relies on development of clean. renewable energy and
conservation
. If a small replacement power .plant is needed, it should be air cooled and air pollution
impacts should not threaten neighboring residents or schools.
RECEIVED MAR 232006
lAV
., t.1 I
State (;A, Zip "11 C1 \. n
Email I c,; ~,0. Of d ~ I, (,)vpl1i1),lDf\\
1ft <<~
I give permission to us my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalitioo (619) 47~220. 401 Mile of Car.; Way, Suite 310, Natiooal City, CA 91950.
Dear Commissione..,. of the Port of San Diego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that has
been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. There are thousands 0 f people and
numerous schools in the area immediately downwind of the power plant. I understand
that negotiations are currently underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polluting
power plant near the same place. This is an opportunity to prevent decades of pollution
and pursue a clean energy future. Please don '( make another 50 year mistake.
CommissiooerSy please:
. Develop an energy replacement strategy. with input ftom the City and the public.
. Adopt an energy strategy that relies on development of clean, renewable energy and
conserwtiDn
. If a Siiiiiii replacement power plant is needed, it should be air cooled and. air poliution
impacts should not threaten neighboring residents or schools.
S~::IY,---s: ;" A. vi ~.EJ~ E I V E 0 MAR 2 3 2006
Address ;A 7'7 i), {!u'h~1 tf"~
City .s c. ~ I State c.^-! Zip cf l- { or:;
Phone G./'i'- 7'f- 'f5''!, Email (O.."?I.Qc.D..:./1-et
f;~.
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950_
------..------
Dear Commissione..,. of the Port of San Diego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is. an inefficient and outdated facility that has
been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. There are thousands of people and
numerous schools in the area immediately downwind of the power plant. I understand
that negotiations are currently underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polluting
power plant near the same place. This is an opportunity to prevent decades of pollution
and pursue a clean energy future. Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
Commissioners, please:
. Develop an energy replacement strategy with input from the City and the public.
. Adopt an energy strategy that relies on development of dean. renewable energy and
conservation
. If a small replacement power plant is needed, it should be air cooled and air pollution
impacts should not threaten neighboring residents or schools.
,""",Jy, ~
Name ~
Address '. . . 'AA tJ ./
City rI!1 ~fu- ~*j I
Phone Email
.
t '
~' .' .- -~, ': --,
tt.~
I give permission to use my name in public w support the above position. F~r more inf~~ contact
Enviroomental Heal1h Coalitioo (619) 474-tr.!20, 401 Mile of Car.; Way, Swte 310, Natiooal CIty, CA91950.
uear commIssioners 01 t.he .Port 0'- San Diego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that has
been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. There are thousands of people and
numerous schools in the area immediately downwind of the power plant. I understand
that negotiations are currently underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polluting
power Plant near the same place. This is an opportunity to prevent decades of pollution
and purs,ue a clean energy future. Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
Commissioners, please:
.. Develop an energy replacement strategy with input flom the City and the public.
. Adopt an energy sttategy that relies on development of clean, renewable energy and
conservation
. If a small replacement power plant is needed, it shouJd be air cooled and air pollution
impacts should not threaten neighboring residents or schools.
it;~
-.rel'~ ~ . .."' .
Name - ~A' ~ \'''(\'"'"" . ....
AddreSs f/.'") ~ )
C;', ~Jf. s..~~!t rV
Phone ,'1-":;'" Ema". .
. . . 'T )'7:,:> bli tb b .. F . , .
I gave pemusslOll to use my name m pu c to support e a eve poSltlon. or more ffilormatlon contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474"()220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950.
1/ Et ;I{ (f' ~
- -------- ..-------------.-.
Dear Commissioners oftbe Port of San Diego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that has
been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. There are thousands of people and
numerous schools in the area immediately downwind of the power plant. I understand
that negotiations are currently underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polluting
power plant near the same place. This is an opportunity to prevent decades of pollutiou
and pursue a clean energy future. Please don't make another 50 year mistake. ~
Commissioners, please:
. Develop an energy replacement strategy witb input trom the City and the pnblic.
. Adopt an energy strategy that relies on development of clean, renewable energy and
conservation
. If a small replacement power plant is needed, it should be air cooled an
impacts sbouJd not threaten neighboring residents or schools. <"'- J
^ I
.1 I I I ~.
tt;~
Sincerely, ./
Name
,
Address J. 7 /".t./ (
City " -I, Stao/11,L Zip f-;/ P / / .
Phone 5{};l i'V'" 7' Email I
I give pennission to use my name in public to support the above positioo. For more: infunnation contact
Enviroomental Healtb Coalitioo (619)474-0220, 401 Mae.fCars Way, Suite 310, Natiooal City, CA 91950.
Dear Commissioners of tbe Port of San Diego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that has
, been polluting western Cbula Vista siuce tbe 1960s. There are thousands of people and
numerous schools in the area immediately downwind of the power plant. I understand
, that negotiations are currently underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
~ Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
I egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polluting
:J power plant near the same place. This is an opportunity to prevent decades of pollution
, and pursue a clean energy future. Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
~ Commissioners, please:
. Develop an energy replacement strategy with input ftom the City and the public.
. Adopt an energy sttategy that relies on development of clean, renewable energy and
conservation
. If a small replacement power plant is needed, it shouJd be air cooled and air pollution
impacts should not threaten neighboring residents or schools.
Sincer~~
. - .-., , .",.,,,,.,..-.,,.,., .....;.- .".~".~..-... .
N ,. " '.'". <.~,' '.
ame .", <"J;'
Addres ("i) <g(p O,nL L "he> N A v ~N ,,,'
City c. r)UL4 V,<Ci'J9 State L"I Zip 9"'1)/
Phone i!I P ?71 f) Email
';-, ",
fU~
....1 give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
~ Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310. National City. CA 91950.
Dear Commissioners of the Port of San Diego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that has
been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. There are thousands of people and
numerous scbools in the area immediately downwind of the power plant. I understand
that negotiations are currently underway to decide the future of tbe South Bay Power
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
egy that tears down the current plant but does not replaCe it with another large polluting
power plant near the same place. This is an opportunity to prevent decades of pollution
and pursue a clean energy future. Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
Commissioners, please:
,..,. . Develop an energy replacement strategy with input from the City and the public.
. Adopt an energy strategy that relies on development of clean. renewable energy and
conservation
. If a small replacement power plant is needed, it should be air cooled and air pollution
impacts should not threaten neighboring residents or schooJs.
Sincerely
Name
Address t?
City (' _ . I,...) , StattVlt,--- Zip q 14!/
Phone J.i 'J;)-.- ,I I> f .) Email '
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile .fCars Way, Suite 310, NatiooalCity, CA 91950.
.A."",...a '-'U'..I.UI..~~'UUC:.l3j U.I tHe run 01 0':)80 JJ.ego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that has
been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. There are thousands of people and
numerous schools in the area immediately downwind of the power plant. I understand
that negotiations are currently underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polluting
power pkmt near the same place. This is an opportunity to prevent decades of pollution
and pUTJiue a clean energy future. Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
Commissioners, please: .
o Develop an energy replacement strategy with input ITom the City and the public.
o Adopt an energy strategy that relies on development of clean, renewable energy and
conservation
. If a smaIl replacement power plant is needed, it should be air cooled and air pollution
impacts should not threaten neighboring residents or schools.
ft't"'_
Sincerely,
Name
Address
City
Pho
flY'l/
I give permission to use my name in public to support Ihe above position. For more information contact
Enviroomental Health Coalition (6t9)'474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950.
Estimados Miembros de la Comision del Puerto de San Diego,
La actuaJ planta de energia de la Bahia Sur es una instalaci6n anticuada e ineficiente Ia cual
ha contaminado la parte occidente de Chula Vista desde los afios sesentas. Hay miles de personas
y bastantes escuelas que se encuentran en direcci6n del viento de la planta. Tengo entendido que
se estan llevando a cabo negociaciones para decidir el futuro de la planta y en base de esto les
insto, a ustedes los Comisionados del Puerto, a que desarrollen una estrategia para reemplazar la
energia la cual contenga la eliminaci6n de la actual planta sin reemplazarIa con otra igual en las
zonas cercanas. Esta es una oportunidad para ]a prevencion de decadas de contaminacion y se-
guir en busca de un futuro con energia limpia. Eviten un error que dure otros 50 aiios.
Miembro de Ia Comision:
. Desarrollen una estrategia que reemplace energia tomando en cuenta a la Ciudad y las
opiniones del publico
. Adopten una estrategia de energia que cuente con el desarrollo de energia limpiD, reno-'
vable y conservaci6n
. Si es necesario el reemplazo de esta planta con otra pequefia, entonces les pedimos que
cuente con la tecnologia de enfriamiento por aire y que los impactos del aire contamina-
do no amenacen la salud de los residentes vecinos ni a los estudiantes de las escueIas.
Atentamente4
Nombre
Direccion q;
Ciudad C. \I
TeIefono ,\11"-(41.1,,/
tt,~
'" v
Estado ('.k COdigo Postal q \ Ci I
Correo-electr6nico -
Autcrizo eI uso de mi nomhre en pOOlico como apoyo a Ia postura .........~..n.. en laparte~. Para masiabmaci6D ecmuniquese
cooIaCoaliciOndeSaludAmbieDrala!(619)474-00.20.401 Mile of Cars Way. Suitc31o..NaaiooaI Citv.CA919S0. ~
Dear Commissioners of the Port of San Diego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that has
been polluting western Chula Vista since the I 96Os. There are thousands of people and
numerous schools in the area immediately downwind of the power plant. I understand
that negotiations are currently underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polluting
power plant near the same place. This is an opportunity to prevent decades ofpollution
and pursue a clean energy future. Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
Commissioners, please:
. Develop an energy replacement strategy with input trom the City and the public.
o Adopt an energy strategy that relies on development of clean, renewable energy and
conservation
. If a small replacement power plant is needed, it should be air cooled and air pollution
impacts should not threaten neighboring residents or schools.
S~:;I~~a- ;;:: K4I
Address 5':30 c?'~fl~~ a~
I City 0:: V. State 0-c<: Zip //7',/ /
'.tPhone St' G20:Z- ~ ,,;:, 4??7Eillail '
t#~
I give pennissioo to use my Dame in public to support the above position. Foe more information contact
EnvironmentaJ Health Coalition (619) 414-0220. 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950.
Dear Commissioners of tbe Port of San Diego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that has
been polluting western Chula Vista since the 196Os. There aTe thousands of people and
numerous schools in the area immediately downwind of the power plant. I understand
that negotiations are currently underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polluting
power plant near the same place. This is an opportunity to prevent decades of pollution
and pursue a clean energy future. Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
Commissioners, please:
. Develop an energy replacement strategy with input ftom the City and the public.
. Adopt an energy strategy that relies on development of clean, renewable energy and
conservation
. If a small replacement power plant is needed, it should be air cooJed and air pollution
impacts should not threaten neighboring residents or schools.
+t; '-,
Sincerely,
Name
Addres
City
Phone
I give permiss to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
EnviroomentaI Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950.
.J!,.suw~uu.s l".UemUros oe fa \...omlSJOn ael ruerto de ~aD lJlegO,
La actual planta de energia de la Bahia Sur es una instalacion anticuada e ineficiente la cual
ha contaminado la parte occidente de Chilla Vista desde los afias sesentas. Hay miles de personas
y bastantes escudas que se encuentran en direccion del viento de la planta. Tengo entendido que
se estAn llevando a cabo negociaciones para decidir el futuro de la planta y en base de esto les
insto, a ustedes los Comisionados del Puerto, a que desarrollen una estrategia para reemplazar la
energia la cual contenga la eliminaci6n de la actual planta sin reemplazarla con otra igual en las
zonas cercanas. Esta es una oportunidad para la prevenci6n de decadas de contaminaci6n y se-
guir en busca de un futuro con energia limpia. Eviten un error que dure otros 50 anos.
Miembro de la Comisioo:
. Desarrollen ~ estrategia que reemplace energia tomando en cuenta a la Ciudad y las
opiniones del publico
. Adopten una estfategia de energia que cuente con et desarrollo de energia limpia, reno-
vable y conservaci6n
. Si es necesario el reemplazo de esta planta con otra pequefia, entonces les pedimos que
cuente con la tecnologia de enfriamiento par aire y que los impactos del aire contamina-
do no amenacen la salud de los residentes vecinos ni a los estudiantes de las escuelas.
t ~
Lt~
"
Atentamente, ,
~::~~nlD~~:~r~:~'~:'i7
Ciudad {" V Estado c.A C6digo Postal q I 9{'
Tel.fono L,fft - D"6:S If Correo-electr6nico -
Aliorizo eJ uso de wi nombrc en p.mlico como apoyo a Ja postura menciooada en la pane superior. Para mas inbmaciO.o conumiquese
coola CoaliciOndeSaludAmbiental aI (619) 474.0220. 401 Mi~eofCars Way. Suite 310. National City. CA 919S0.
>/:..
- - ---
Dear Commissioners ofthe Port of San Diego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that has
been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s, There are thousands of people and
numerous schools in the area immediately downwind of the power plant, I understand
that negotiations are cunentiy underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
Plant I strongly urge the Port Connnissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polluting
power plant near the same place. This is an opportunity to prevent decades of pollution
and pursue a clean energy future, Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
Commissioners, please:
. Develop an energy replacement strategy witb inpnt Horn the City and the public.
. Adopt an energy strategy that relies on development of clean. renewable energy and
conservation
.. If a small replacement power plant is needed, it should be air cooled and air pollution
impacts should not threaten neighbori sidents or schools.
ft,~
,I\tr
I give permissiWl to use my name in public to support the above position. For more infonnation contact
Enviroomental Health Coalition (6t9) 474-0220, 40t Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950.
Dear Commissioners ofthe Port of San Diego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that has
been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. There are thousands of people and
numerous schools in the area immediately downwind of the power plant. I understand
that negotiations are currently underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polluting
power plant near the same place. This is an opportunity to prevent decades of pollution
and pursue a clean energy future. Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
Commissioners, please:
. Develop an energy replacement strategy with input Horn the City and the public.
. Adopt an energy strategy that relies on development of clean, renewable energy and
conservation
. If a small replacement power plant is ueeded, it should be air cooled aod air pollutiou
impacts should not threaten neighboring residents or schools.
'ttt~
,
Sincerely,
Name
Address
City
Phone Y?y O~~mail
I give permtSSlon to use my name in public to support the above position For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220,401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, Nationa] City, CA 9195(\
.._.____..._._...n__._~
___n.__._....__
...-.-.------.------.----
Dear Commissioners ofthe Port of San Diego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that has
been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s, There lIre thousands of people and
numerous schools in the area immediately downwind of the power plant I understand
that negotiations are currently underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polluting
power plant near the same place, This is an opportunity to prevent decades of pollution
and pursue a clean energy future, Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
Commissioners, please:
. Develop an energy replacement strategy with input Horn the City and the public.
. Adopt an energy strategy that relies on development of clean, renewable energy and
conservation
. If a small replacement power plant is needed, it should be air cooled and air pollution
impacts should not threaten neighboring residents or schools.
\J'f"
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619)474-0220, 401 Mite of Cars Way, Suite 310. National City, CA 91950.
~~''''../
Estimados Miembros de Ia Comision del Puerto de San Diego,
La actual planta de energia de la Bahia Sur es una instalacion anticuada e ineficiente la cual
ha eontaminado la parte occidente de Chula Vista desde 105 atlas sesentas. Hay miles de personas
y bastantes eseuelas que se encuentran en direcci6n del viento de la planta. Tengo entendido que
se esUin Ilevando a cabo negociaeiones para deeidir el futuro de la planta y en base de esto les
insto. a ustedes los Comisionados del Puerto. a que desarrollen una estrategia para reemplazar la
energia la euaJ contenga la eliminacion de Ia actual planta sin reemplazada con 01I'a igual en las
zonas cercanas. Esta es una oportunidad para la prevenei6n de decadas de eontaminaci6n y se-
guir en busea de un futuro con energia limpia. Eviten un error que dure otros 50 anos.
MieDlbro de Ia Comisron:
'-,
. Desarrollen una estrategia que reemplace energia tomando en cuenta a la Ciudad y las
opiniones del publico
. Adopten una estrategia de energia que euente con el desarrollo de energia limpia, reno-
vable y conservaci6n
. Si es necesario el reemplazo de esta planta con otta pequeila, entonces les pedimos que
cuente con Ja tecnologia de enfiiamiento par aire y que los impact05 del aire contamina-
do no amenacen la salud de 105 residentes vecinos ni a 105 estudiantes de las escuelas.
~~$~~
..;:'i),0:'
~tentamente,
',)Nombre -' .
>JOirecci6n " V
~iUdad c r{ V L " 1['5" J Estado C II C6digo Postal r / I -
eMfono '11. ,"l C 14f-,. Correo-electt6nico -
.\ ---.- Ja . ~- ,-~-- ... .
AW"onzo eJ uso de nu iIombre en publico como 89Oyo a 1a postura meoCJ.......ua en parte 5\IP<<1Ol. ..-..... mas UllWIIIiIICI oomumquese
conla Coa6ci6nde Salud Ambieotal aI (619) 474-0220. 401 Mile of Cars Way. Suire 310. National CiIv. CA9t9S0. W
-----
~,..~-----
Estimados Miembros de la Common del Puerto de San Diego,
La actual planta de energia de la Bahia Sur es W18 instalacion anticuada e ineficiente la cual
ha contaminado Ia parte occidente de Chula Vista desde 105 afios sesentas. Hay miles de personas
y bastantes escueJas que se encuentran en direccion del viento de la planta. Tengo entendido que
se estan lIevando a cabo negociaciones para decidir el futuro de la planta y en base de esto les
iusto, a ustedes 108 Comisionados del Puerto. a que desarrollen W18 estrategia para reemplazar la
energla la cool contenga la eliminaci6n de la actual planta sin reemplazarla con olra igool en las
zonas cercanas. Esta es una oportunidad para la prevenci6n de decadas de contaminaci6n y se-
guir en busca de un futuro con energia limpia. Eviten un error que dure otros 50 anos.
Miembro de fa Comisioo:
.. Desarrollen una estrategia que reemplace energia tomando en cuenta a la Ciudad y las
opiniones del publico
iii Adopten una eS1I'ategia de energia que cuente con el desarrollo de energia limpia. reno-
vable y conservaci6n
. Si es necesario el reemplazo de esta planta con atra pequena. entonces les pedimos que "
cuente con la tecnologia de enmamiento por aire y que los impactos del aire contamina.
do no amenacen la salud de los residentes vecinos ni alas estudiantes de !as escuelas.
Atentamente,
Nombre
Direcci6n
Ciudad
T elefono .
A~ eI uso de mi nombreen publico como apoyo a Ja postura ..-....inn...... en Ja parte~. Para masUrlixmaci6u COIDUOiquese
coola Coalicioode SaJud AmbiethI aI (619)414-0220. 401 Mile of Can Way. Suiie310. National City. CA 91950. )l
EstiDlados Mjembros de Ia CODlision del Puerto de San Diego,
La actual planta de energia de la Bahia Sur es una instalaci6n antieuada e ineficiente la cual
ba contaminado la parte occidente de Chula Vista desde I"" aft"" sesentas. Hay miles de personas
y bastantes eseuelas que se eneuentran en direccion del viento de la planta. Tengo entendido que
se estAn llevando a cabo negociaciones para decidir el futuro de la planta y en base de esto les
insto, a ustedes los Comisionados del Puerto. a que desaITollen una estrategia para reemplazar la
energia la coal eoDtenga la eliminaei6n de la actual planta sin reemplazarla con otra igual en las
zonas eercanas. Esta es una oportunidad para la prevencion de decadas de contaminaci6n y se-
guir en busca de un futuro con energia limpia. Eviten un error que dure orros 50 aiios.
MieDlbro de 1a Comisioo:
. Desarrollen una estrategia que reemplace energia tomando en cuenta a.la Ciudad y las
opiniones del publico
. Adopten una estrategia de energia que cuente con el desarrollo de energia limpia, reno- "
vable y conservaci6n '
. Si es necesario el reemplazo de esta planta con otra pequeila, entonces les: pedimos que
cuente con la tecnologia de enftiamiento par aire y que los impactos del ~e contamina-
do no arnenacen la salud de IDS residentes vecinos ni a 105 estudiantes de las escuelas.
~tentamente,
Nombre
Direcci6n
Ciudad Estado CA- C6digo Postal
Telefono 1~~Correo-electr6nico
Aulorizo eI uso de mi nombre en publico como apoyo a la postura mencionada en la parte superioc. Para mas infurmaci6n comuniquese
conla CoaIici6nde SaJud AmbieJll:aI aJ (619) 474.0220, 401 Mile orCars Way, Suite 310. National City, CA 919S0.
itt~..
..
----------.----
-...-.--.,
Estimados Miembros de Ia Comision del Puerto de San Diego,
La actual planta de energia de la Bahia Sur es una instalacion anticuada e ineficiente la cual
ha contaminado la parte occidente de Chula Vista desde los afios s~sentas. Hay miles de personas
y bastantes escuelas que se encuentran en direccion del viento de la pJanta. Tengo entendido que
se estan llevando a cabo negociaciones para decidir el futuro de la planta y en base de esto les
insto, a ustedes los Comisionados del Puerto, a que desarrollen una estrategia para reemplazar)a
energia la cual contenga la eliminacion de la actual planta sin reemplazarla con otra igual en Ias
zonas cercanas. Esta es una oportwtidad para la prevenci6n de decadas de contaminaci6n y so-
guir en busea de un futuro con energia limpia. Eviten un error que dure otros 50 aiios.
Miembro de la Comisi6n:
. Desarrollen una estrategia que reemplace energia tomando en cuenta a Ia Ciudad y las
opiniones del publico
. Adopten una estrategia de energia que cuente con el desarrollo de energia limpia. reno-
vable y conservaci6n
. Si es necesario el reemplazo de esta planta con otra pequeila, entonces les pedimos que
cuente con la teenologia de enfriamiento par aire y que 105 impactos del aire contamina-
do no amenacen la saIud de 10s residen.tes veeinos ni a Ios estudiantes de !as eseuelas.
,
Atentamente
Nombre
Direcci6n
Ciudad . Estado (1 A- -C6digo Postal
Telefon~ rreo-electt6nico
Autorizo el uso de mi oombce en publico como apoyo ala posIUra menciooada en ta parte~.. Para mas i..fnrma...w. comuniquese
coo La Coalici6nde SaludAmbiental al (619)47+0220, 40] Mile orCars Way, SUitc310. National City, CA 91950.
,.
"".,,,
c,.~ ..+
-----0'"
-- -~........ Y1<U.J.U:1 ut: energia de la Bahia Sur es una instalaci6n anticuada e ineficiente la cuaJ
ha contaminado Ia parte occidente de ChuJa Vista desde los ailos sesenlas. Hay miles de personas r '\
y haslantes escuelas que se encuentran en direcci6n del viento de la planta. Tengo entendido que
se estAn llevando a cabo negociaciones para decidir el futuro de la planta y en base de esto Ies
insro, a ustedes Ios Comisionados del Puerto, a que desarrollen urta estrategia para reemplazar la
energia la cual Cootenga Ia eliminaci6n de Ia actual planta sin reemplazarIa con otra igual en las
zonas cercanas. Esta es urta Oportunidad para la prevenci6n de decadas de contaminaci6n y se-
guir en busca de un futuro con energla limpia. Eviten un error que dure otros 50 anos.
Miembr. de la Comisi6n: ,
. Desarrollen una estrategia que reemplace energla tomando en CUCDta a Ia Ciu~d ~ '
opiniones del publico , .
\ \'
. Adopten urta estrategia de energla que cuente con el desarrollo de energla limpia, reao-'
vabJe Y conservaci6n
. Si es necesario el reemplazo de es.. plan.. con otra pequeJJa, entonces les pedimos que
Cllente COn la tecnologia de enfiiamiento par aire y que Jos impactos del aice contamina~
do no amenacen Ia salud de Ios residentes vecinos oj a Ios estodiantes de las escueJas.
tIt ,~~
'~
Cjt710
Aworizo d "'" '" mi no_ on ,ubi"" como """0 ,\. po_ """""""" on b p"", ",p........ P", "'" mfunmc;6n "",.mi,,,,,,,
COlIla CoaJiciOnde Salud AmbientaJ aI (619) 474.0220; 401 Mile ofCacs Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950.
Dear Commissioners of the Port of San Diego,
The existing South BayPower Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that has
been polluting westem Chula Vista since the 1960s. There are thousands of people and
numerous schools in the area inunediately downwind of the power plant. I understand
that negotiations are currentJy underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polluting
power plant near the same place. This is an oPportunity to prevent decades of pollution
and pursue a clean energy future. Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
Commissioners, please:
. Develop an energy replacement strategy with input Ham the City and the P!ll>1ic.
. Adopt an energy strategy that relies on development of clean, renewable energy and
conservation
. If a small replacement power, plant is needed, it should be air cooled and air pollution
impacts should not threaten neighboring residents or schools.
Sincer~
Name ' ,
Address I {)IO Y""flri n '
City l(.(l~ Vi5--h< State fA Zip C(I <'111
Phon '/4 ,-/'2.D-'?1-t?D Email (\N""c1o.06VVl~' Q
\I\~,\,(,-\)I'V\
1 give permission to use my name in public to suppon the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Healt1t Coalition (619)474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, NatiooaJ City, CA 91950.
Dear Commissioners of the Port of San Diego,
Tbe existing Soutb Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility tbat b...
been polluting westem Chula Vista since the 1960s. There are thousands of people and
numerous scbools in the area inunediately downwind of the power plant. I understand
that negotiations are CUrrentJy underway to decide the future of the South Bay POwer
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
egy that tears down the cUrrent plant but does not replace- it with another large polluting
pOwer plant near the same place. This is an Opportunity to prevent decades of pollution
and pursue a clean energy future. Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
Commissiooers, please:
. Develop an energy replacement strategy with input Hom the City and the public.
. Adopt an energy strategy that relies on deveiopment of clean, renewable energy and
conservation
. If a small replacement power plant is needed, it should be air cooled and air pollution
impacts should not threaten neighboring residents or schools.
S.=IY~
Name
Address O.._~', ~
Ci<)()h"'c. "<-,,. '. ,_ - Z;p 0<,..,,\
Phone Email
it; ~~. '
~
1 give permiss;on 10 use my name in public 10 support the above position. For more info ation contact
Environmental Health Coalition (6]9) 474'{)220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, N ooa) City, CA 91950.
, ,
--------------.-.--.--- -
Dear Commissioners of/be Port of San Diego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that has
been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. There are thousands of people and
numerous schools in the area immediately downwind of the power plant. I understand
tbat negotiations are currentJy underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it witb another large polluting
power plant near the same place. This is an opportunity to prevent decades of pollution
and pursue a clean energy future. Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
Commissioners, pJease:
. Develop an energy replacement strategy with input trom the City and the public.
. Adopt an energy strategy that relies on development of clean, renewable energy and
conservation
. If a smaH replacement power plant is needed, it should be air cooled and air pollution
impacts should not threaten neighboring residents or schools.
I give permission to use y name in public to support the above position. For more information t'rrotoM
Environmental Health Coalition 11;;10\ A"U' M..... M~. no _ _
- --........waua e Jneficiente la cual
--..... .. 11.na <1esde 105 alios sesentas. Hay miles de personas
.- --uou.s que se encuentran en direcci6n del viento de Ja planta. Tengo entendido que
se estan Uevando a cabo negociaciones para decidir eJ futuro de la planta y en base de esto Jes
iDS/O, a ustedes los Comisiooados del Puerto, a que desarroUen una estrategJa para rccmplazar Ia
energfa Ja coal contenga la eliminaci6n de la actual planta sin reemplazarla Con otra iguaJ en las~(
ZOnas Cercanas. Esta es una oportunidad para Ia prevenci6n de decadas de COntaminaci6n Y Se-
guJr en busca de un futuro con energia limpia. Eviten un error que dure Ofros 50 onos.
Miembro de 1a COJllisi6n:
. DesarroUen una CStrategia que reemplace energia tomando en cuenta a la CiUdad Y las
opiniones del publico <'
o AdoPten una estrategJa de energJa que cuente con eI desarrollo de energia limpia, reno-
vable Y conservacion
o Si es necesario el reemplazo de esta planta Con otra pequeila, entonces Jes pedimos que
cuente con Ia tecnologia de enJiiamiento pot aire y que los impactos del aire contamina_
do no amenacen la salud de los residentes vecinos ni a los estudiantes de las escuelas.
\tentamente,
Nombre
Direccion
Ciudad I-IA
TeJefono ''1 -~orreo-electr6nico
A"_d ""'d.m; -......1iJ_.apoyo.l.oo_ """"'...... '" ,...... _... ""'-inf.....ci.. .......""" ,
""'" Coolici60d."""" Aoilii.Ob'''(619)474-<1220. 401 MiI..fC", Way. s...."O. "'''''''' City. CA'I9S0. ./...
'ear Commissioners of the Port of San Diego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that has
.en POlluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. There are thousands of people and
merous schools in the area immediately downwind of the power plant. I understand
It negotiations are currently underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
Ult. I Strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat_
' that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polluting
ver plant near the same place. This is an oPportunity to prevent decades of P9!1ution
pursue a clean energy future. Please don't make another 50 year misfake.
lmissioners, please:
o DeveJop an energy replacement strategy with input &om the City and the public.
o Adopt an energy $/rategy that reJies on development of clean, renewable energy and
conservation
If a smaU replacement POWer plant is needed, it should be air cooled and air pollution
impacts should nOt threaten neighboring residents or schools.
,1j>stimados Miembros de fa Comisi6D del Puerto de San Diego,
t La actual planta deenergia de Ia Bahia Sur es una instaJaci6n anticuada e ineficiente la cuaJ
jha conlaminado la parte occidente de ChuJa Vista desde los anos sesentas. Hay miles de personas
~ baslantes eSCuelas que se encuentran en direcci6n del viento de la planta. Tongo entendido que .
~se esLin llevando a cabo .negOCiacianes para decidir el futuro de la planta y en base de esto les
to, a ustedes 10s Comisionados del PUena, a qne desarrollen una estrategia para rCCmplazar Ia I
' ergia Ja cuaJ COntenga la eliminaci6n de Ia actual planta sin reemplazarla Con Olra igual en las
- zonas Cercanas. Esta es una oPottunidad para Ia prevenci6n de decadas de COntaminaci6n y se-
=- guir en busca de un futuro can energia limpia. Eviten un error que dure Ofros 50anos.
-/
.) Miembro de 'a Comisi6n:
o Desarrollen Una estrategJa que reemplace energia tamando en cuenta a la Ciudad y I",
opiniones del pUblico
o Adopten una eslrategJa de energia que cuente Con eI desarrollo de enetgia limpia, reno-
vable Y conservacion
o 8i es necesario eJ reemplazo de esta pJanta con otra pequeila, entonces Jes pedimos que
Cuente COn Ja teenolOgia de enJiiamionto par aire y qne los inJpactos del aire CODtamina_
do no antenacen la salnd de los residentes vecinos oj a los estudiantes de las escueJas.
I ~'
, :}
A"orizod ""'de.. -.........'ko'-...>O.looo"...""""'...... '" 1.__. ...._~_...._
""'" Coalici60 de """" _i_" (619)474-<1220. 40, Mil. ofC", Way. Soit, 310. "''''0"", Citv. CA 919'0.
----------_n__ . _________
Dear COlJltnissioners of the Port of San Diego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that has
been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. Thereme thousands of people and
numerous schools in the area immediately downwind of the POwer plant. I understand
that negotiations are cUrrently underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polluting
power plant near the same place. This is an oPPOrtunity to prevent decades of pollution
and pursue a clean energy future. Please don 'f make another 50 year mistake.
COmmissioDers, please:
o Develop an energy replacement strategy with input &001 the City and the public.
o Adopt an energy strategy that relies on development of clean, renewable energy and
conservation
o If a small replacement power plant is Deeded, it should be air cooled and air pollution
impacts shonld nOl threaten neighboring residents or schools.
-- -----..- ----------.----..-
s;.~re".~..
Name . .. . .. . . ... '.~':'i
Addre~ . . 0 "u~ .
City _"Tate ~ Zip '1/ '1/(
Phone~G{1\ ffz(, 3, l.~Email
....
i, ~.,
-""
I give />CI1nission to USe my name in public to sUpport the aboye """iri~ <..
Environmental Health Coalition (61Q\ ,f'7A ""'__
stimados Miembros de Ia Comision del Puerto de San Diego,
La actual planta de energia de la Bahia Sur es una iru;.ta1aci6n anticuada e ineficiente la cual
1 contaminado la parte occidente de Chula Vista desde 10s afios sesentas. Hay miles de personas
bastantes escuelas que se encuentran en direcci6n del viento de la planta. Tengo entendido que
~ estAn llevando a cabo negociaciones para decidir el futuro de la planta y en base de esto les
iSto, a ustedes los Comisionados del Puerto, a que desarrollen una estrategia para reemplazar la ~
Ilergfa la coal contenga la eliminaci6n de la actual planta sin reemplazarla con otra igual en las ~
:mas cercanas. Esta es W13 opornmidad para la prevenci6n de decadas de contaminaci6n y se- i
uir en busC8 de un futuro con energia limpia. Eviten un error que dure otros 50 alios.
fiembrb'de 18 Comision:
. Desarrollen una estrategia que reemplace energia tomando en euema a la Ciudad y las
opiniones del publico
. Adopten una estr3tegia de energia que cuente con el desarrollo de energia limpia, reno-
vable y eonservaci6n
. Si es necesario el reemplazo de esta planta con otra pequefta, entonees les pedimos que
euente con la tecnologia de enfiiamiento par aire y que 10s impactos del aire contamina.
do no enacen :kt sal de 105 r . entes vecinos ni a 105 estudiantes de las escuelas.
~
tentam
"ombre
)ireccion
::iudad
felefuno
It
Altorizo eJ 1150 de mi oombre en pubtioo como apoyo a la posttn meucionada mla parte superior. Para mas iniOrmaci6n comwrlq~
conla CoaHciOnde SaJud Ambiental al (619) 474-Q220. 401 Mile of Cars Way. Suite 310. National Cirv. CA919SO.
----.
lear Commissioners ofthe Port of San Diego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that has
een polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. There are thousands of people and
umerous schools in the area immediately downwind of the power plant. I understand
~at negotiations are currently underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
'Iant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
gy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polluting
,ower plant near the same place. This is an opportunity to prevent decades ofpollution
nd pursue a clean el1ergy future. Please don't malre another 50 year mistalre.
~ommissioDers, please:
. Develop an energy replacement strategy with input from the City and the pnblic.
. Adopt an energy strategy that relies on development of clean, renewable energy and
conservation
. If a small replacement power plant is needed, it sbould be air cooled and air pollution
impacts should not threaten neighboring residents or scbools.
it, ~.
;E:::'~ Avlc
City &.~'. S~te (A Zip q 14'1 I
Phone _, 1f.2tJ'o?d(_Emall
1 give permission. to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Heal1h Coalltioo (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, Natiooal City, CA 91950.
j
Dear Commissioners of the Port of San Diego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that has
been polluting western Chula Vista since the 196Os. There are thousands of people and
numerous schools in the area immediately downwind of the power plant. I understand
that negotiations are currently underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polluting
power plant near the same place. This is an opportunity to prevent decades of pollution
and pursue a clean energy future. Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
Commissioners, please:
. Develop an energy replacement strategy with input :lTom the City and the public.
. Adopt an energy strategy that relies on development of cleaI4 renewable energy and
conservation
If a small replacement power plant is needed, it should be air cooled and air pollution
impacts should not threaten neighboring residents or schools.
I
[
~incerely,
Name
. Address
'City
Phone L
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information cootact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950.
Dear Commissioners of the Port of San Diego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that has
I been polluting western Chuta Vista since the 1960s. There are thousands of people and
numerous schools in the area immediately downwind of the power plant. I understand
that negotiations are cUITently underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polluting
power plant near the same place. This is an opportunity to prevent decades of pollution
and pursue a clean energy future. Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
Commissioners, please:
. Develop an energy replaCement strategy with input ITom the City and the public.
. Adopt an energy strategy that relies on development of clean, renewable energy and
conservation
. If a small replacement power plant is needed, it should be air cooled and air pollution
impacts should not threaten neighboring residents or schools.
I
S~~::IY:....... _ ~
Addre~~ ~
CitYQ\^. 0 ~ ,,) ,_~ State <., Zip 1 ( "711
Phune 4;"1 - 7 <; )"> Email
. .
ttt~
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalitioo (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, Natiooal City, CA 91950.
Estimados Miembros de Ja Comision del Puerto de San Diego,
La actual planta de energfa de la Bahia Sur es una instalaci6n anticuada e ineficiente la cual
ha contaminado la pane occidente de Chula Vista desde los ailos sesentas. Hay miles de personas
y bastantes escuelas que se encuentran en direcci6n del viento de la planta. Tengo entendido que
se estan lIevando a cabo negociaciones para decidir eI futuro de la planta y en base de esto les
insto, a ustedes 10s Comisionados del Puerto, a que desarrollen una estrategia para reemplazar la
energia la cual contenga la eliminacion de la actual planta sin reemplazarla con otra igual en Jas
zonas cercanas. Esta es una oportunidad para la prevencion de decadas de contaminacion y se- J
guir en biIsC8 de WI futuro con energia limpia. Eviten un error que dure otros 50 afios.
Miembro de 13 Comisioo:
. Desarrollen una estrategia que reemplace energia tomando en cuenta a la Ciudad y las
opiniones del publico
. Adopten una estrategia de energfa que cuente con el desarrollo de energia limpia. reno-
vable y conservaci6n
. Si es necesario el reemplazo de esta planta con otra pequefia, entonces les pedimos que
cuente con la tecnologia de enfriamiento par aire y que los impactos del aire contamina-
do no amenacen la salud de los residentes vecinos ni a los estudiantes de las escuelas.
ft#.~
Estado C. C6digo Postal~
CorreO-electr6nicof"'~" ""'@t.\J c:.oo\..
<
- -.'-'
AI.aorizo el usa de mi Dombre eD publico como apoyo a la postura menciooada en la parte superior. Para mas.
conla Coalici6ndeSalud Ambiental aI (619)414-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950.
"." "
" ,,-,
-~---
Estimados Miembros de Ja Comisilm del Puerto de San Diego,
La actual planta de energfa de Ia Bahia Sur es una instalaci6n anticuada e ineficienre Ia cual
ha contaminado la parte occidente de Chula Vista desde los afios sesentas. Hay miles de personas
y bastantes escuelas que se encuentran en direccion del viento de la planta. Tengo entendido que
se estan llevando a cabo negociaciones para decidir el futuro de la planta y en base de esto les
insto, a ustedes los Comisionados del Puerto, a que desarroIlen una estrategia para reemplazar la
energia la cual contenga la eJiminaci6n de la actual planta sin reemplazarla con otra iguaJ en Jas
zonas cereanas. Esta es una oportunidad para la prevenci6n de decadas de contaminaci6n y se-
gnir en busca de WI futuro con energia limpia. Eviten un error que dure otros 50 afios.
Miembro de Ia Comisi6n:
. Desarrollen una estrategia que reemplace energia tomando en cuenta a Ja Ciudad y Jas
opiniones del publico
. Adopten una estrategia de energia que cuente con el desarrollo de energia limpia. reno-
vable y conservaci6n
. Si es necesario el reemplazo de esta planta con otra pequef1a. entonces les pedimos que
cuente con la tecnologia de en:fi'iamiento par aire y que los impactos del aire contamina-
do no amenacen la saJud de los residentes vecinos ni a los estudiantes de las escuelas.
\tentamente,
Nombre
Direcci6n . v
Ciudad \!) Estado (' C\ C6digo Pos
Telefono;> 75\ -Il2,t\'::.. Correo-electr6nico
Aul:orizo el uso de mi nombre en poolico como apoyo a hi postura "menciooada en Ia parte~" Para mas informaciOn comuniquese
con la CoaIiciOnde Salud AmbieUal aI (619) 474-0220. 401 Mi1e of Cars WaY. Suite 310. Natkmal C.itv_ l'A 91950
(
Estimados Miembros de la COIDision del Puerto de San Diego,
La actual planta de energia de la Bahia Sur es una instalaci6n anticuada e ineficiente la cual
ha contaminado Ia pane occidente de Chula Vista desde los ailos sesentas. Hay miles de personas
y bastantes escuelas que se encuentran en direcci6n del viento de Ja planta. Tengo entendido que
se estan llevando a cabo negociaciones para decidir el futuro de la planta y en base de esto les
insto, a ustedes los Comisionados del Puert<;t, a que desarrollen una estrategia para reemplazar la
energfa la cual contenga la eliminaci6n de la actual planta sin reemplazarla con otra igual en las
zonas cercanas. Esta es una oportunidad para la prevenci6n de decadas de contaminaci6n y se-
guir en busca de un futuro con energia limpia. Eviten un error que dure otros 50 anos.
Miembro de la Comision:
. Desarrollen una estrategia que reemplace energia tomando en cuenta aila Ciudad y la&
opiniones del publico
. Adopten una estrategia de energia que cuente con el desarrollo de-energfa limpia, reno-
vable y conservaci6n
. Si es necesario el reemplazo de esta planta con otra peqUeDa, entonces lespedimos que
cuente con la tecnologia de enfriamiento par aire y que 10s impactos del aire contamina-
do no amenacen la salud de los residentes vecinos oi a 105 estudiantes de las escuelas.
~7~€;~!?i:U
Ciudad (; i-/-,-I /A Vi-" 1-... Estado LA. C6digo Postal ,/, 7' r /
Telefono :H.j.s-.;,oc" Correo-electr6nico
Autorizo eI uso de mi nombre eo pubHco COIbO apoyo a la postura mencWnada en la parte superior. Para mas infurmaci6n comuniquese
coP la Coalici60de Salud Ambiental aI (619) 414-0220. 401 Mile of Cars Way. Suite 310, Nariona] City,_ CA 9]950.
----~-~
Estimados Miembros de 18 Comisilm del Puerto de SaD Diego,
La actual planta de energia de Ia Bahia Sur es una instalaci6n amicuada e ineficiente la cuaJ
ha contaminado la parte occidente de Chula Vista desde los aftos scsentas. Hay miles de personas
y bastantes escuelas que se encuentran en direcci6n del viento de la planta. Tengo entendido que
se estAn llevando a cabo negociaciones para decidir el futuro de la planta y en base de esto les
iOOo, a ustedes los Comisionados del Puerto, a que desarrollen una estrategia para reemplazar la
energia la coal contenga la eliminaci6n de la actual planta sin reernplazarJa con otta igual en Jas
zonas cercanas. Esta es una oportunidad para la prevenci6n de decadas de contaminacion y s7 "\
guir en busca de un futuro con energia limpia. Eviten un error que dure otros 50 alios. ...
Miembro de la Comision:
. Desarrollen una estrategia que reemplace energia tomando en cuenta a la Ciudad y las
opiniones del publico
. Adopten una estrategia de energia que cuente con el desarrollo de energia Jimpia, reno-
vable y conservaci6n
. Si es necesario el reemplazo de esta planta con otra pequefia, entonces les pedimos que
cuente con la tecnologfa de enfriamiento par aire y que los impactos del aire contamina-
do no amenacen la salud de los residentes vecinos ni a 10s estudiantes de las escuelas.
"
\tentamente, , . .....' ..,....
~~:c~~n~~
Ciudad C [J \/ Estado 2A C6digo Postal 11 q i /
TeJefoIW ~i:r1-1 q '}8:orreo-electr6nico
Aut0ri20 eI usode mi oombre"enpmlico como apoyo a lapo!tura mencionada enlapart:e superior. Para masinf0nnaci6ncomuniquese
,.""br.....I;..;n....I..(!~I.....A_..:_..._I_Ir.c.n\..u,.....,..."..",.... ..~ ~, n' ~.~,.,. .~., ~._._._
Estimados Miembros de Ja Comisi6n del Puerto de San Diego,
La actual planta de energfa de la Bahia Sur es una instalaci6n anticuada e ineficiente la coal
ha contaminado la parte occidente de Chula Vista desde ]os ailos sesenlas. Hay miles de personas
y bastantes escueIas que se encuentran en direcci6n del vieoto de la planta. Teogo entendido que
se estAn llevando a cabo negociaciones para decidir el futuro de la planta y en base de esto les
insto, a ustedes los Comisionados del Puerto, a que desarrollen una estrategia para reemplazar la
energia la cual contenga la eliminaci6n de la actual pIanta sin reempIazarla con otra igual en las
zonas cercanas. Esta es una oportunidad para la prevenci6n de decadas de contaminaci6n y se- j
guir en bbsca de un futuro con energia limpia. Eviten un error que dure otros 50 anos.
Miembro de la Comisi6n:
. Desarrollen una estrategia que reemplaee energia tomando en cuenta a la Ciudad y las
opiniones del publico
. Adopten una estrategia de energia que euente con el desarrollo de energia limpia, reno-
vable y eonservaci6n
. Si es necesario el reemplazo de esta planta con otra pequefia, entonees les pedimos que
euente con la tecnologia de en:fiiamiento por aire y que los impactos del aire contamina-
do no amenacen la salud de los residentes vecinos ni a los estudiantes de las escuelas.
~~~9rc::,oo", q\<tl
Telefono i<.( 1..-73 I :r Correo-electr6nico't"'~" 1IA@.r.\I ~<:d..
Autorizo eI uso de roi IIOmbre en publico como apoyo a la postura mencionada en Ia parte ~OI:. Para mas .
coola Coalicionde-SaJud AmbientaJ aJ (619) 474-{1220, 401 MJleofCars Way, Suite 310, NationaJCity, CA 91950.
iff _~
,
. -~ --.
",.'" . " ,.
-----.-
Estimados Miembros de Ja Comision del Puerto de SaD Diego,
La actual planta de energfa de la Bahia Sur es una instalaci6n anticuada e ineficienle la cuaJ
tIa contaminado la parte occidente de Chula Vista desde 105 ailos sesentas. Hay miles de personas
y bastantes escuelas que se encuentran en direcci6n del viento de la planta. Tengo entendido que
)e estAn llevando a cabo negociaciones para decidir el futuro de la planta y en base de esto les
115tO, a ustedes los Comisionados del Puerto, a que desarrollen una estrategia para reemplazar la
mergia la eual contenga la eliminaci6n de la actual planta sin reemplazarla con otra iguaJ en Jas
wnas eercanas. Esta es W1a oportunidad para la prevenci6n de decadas de contaminaei6n y se-
~uir en busca de un futuro con energia Jimpia. E-viten un error que dure otros 50 anos. I
\iiembro de )a Comision:
. Desarrollen una estrategia que reemplace energia tomando en cuenta a la Ciudad y las
opiniones del ,publico
. Adopten una estrategia de energia que euente con eJ desarroHo de energia limpia, reno-
vable y conservaci6n
. Si es necesario el reemplazo de esta planta con otra pequefta, entonees les pedimos que
euente con la tecnologia de enfiiamiento par aire y que 105 impactos del aire contamina-
do no amenacen 1a salud de los reSidentes vecinos ni a los estudiantes de las eseuelas.
'"
tentamente,
\lombre
)irecci6n
:iudad ~) Estado (' n C6digo Pos al q 2 l ...", 4
r elMono :;> ? 51 -11 ",LF Correo-electr6nico
A11orizo el D80 de mi nombre en publico como apoyo a Ia postura Inenciooada en 1a parte superior. Para mas informaciOn comuniquese
coo laCoalici6nde Salud Ambiental aI (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA9J950.
r
Estimados Miembros de la ComisioD del Puerto de San Diego,
La actual planta de energia de la Bahia Sur es una instalaci6n anticuada e ineficiente la cual
ha contaminado la parte occidente de Chula Vista desde los alios sescolas. Hay miles de personas
y bastantes escueJas que se encuentran en direcci6n del viento de la planta. Tengo entendido que
se estin llevando a cabo negociaciones para decidir el futmo de la planta y en base de esto les
insto, a ustedes.los Comisionados del Puerto, a que desarrollen una estrategia para reemplazar Ia
energfa ta cual eontenga la eliminaci6n de la actual planta sin reemplazarla con otra igual en )as
zonas eercanas. Esta es una oportunidad para la prevenci6n de decadas de eontaminaci6n y se-
guir en busca de un futuro con energia limpia. Eviten un error que dure otros 50 alios.
Miembro de Ia Comision:
. Desarrollen una estrategia que reemplace energia tomando en euenta a;Ja Ciudad y 13!i
opiniones del publico
. Adopten una estrategia de energia que cuente con el desarrollo deenergia limpia, reno-
vahle y eonservaci6n
. Si es neeesario el reemplazo de esta planta con otra pequeiia, entonces les pedimos que
cuente con la tecnologia de enfiiamiento por aire y que los impactos del aire contamina-
do no amenacen la saIud de 105 residentes veeinos ni a losestudiantes de las escuelas.
\tentam~~,,;...;"
Nombre' 'J"Y
Direcci6n., Hie' .", G ' '_ -# 1'0
Ciudad r..i!vJ ILl. V/,hEstado LA. - C6digoPostal
TelMono 5f-J,S" ~ <"-" Correo-electr6nico
~....9....-/
Autorizo eI uso de mi oombre en publico como apoyo a la ~ mencionada en la parte superior. Para mas informaci6n oomuniquese
oonlaCoalici6ndeSaludAmbiental aI (619)474-0220,401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City,-CA91950.
-~-_.__.. ----..---
Estimados Miembros de Ja Comision del Puerto de San Diego,
La actual planta de energfa de fa BaWa Sur es una instalaci6n anticuada e ineficiente la cual
ha contaminado la parte occidente de Chula Vista desde los aftos sosentas. Hay miles de personas
y bastanles escuelas que se encuen1ran en direcci6n del viento de la planta. Tengo entendido que
se estAn llevando a cabo negociaciones para decidir el futuro de la planta y en base de esto les
insto, a ustedes 105 Comisionados del Puerto, a que desarrollen una estrategia para reemplazar la
energia la eual contenga la eliminaci6n de la actual planta sin reemplazarla con otra igual en Jas
zonas eercanas. Esta es una oportunidad para Ia prevenci6n de decadas de contaminaci6n y s7 '\
guir en busea de W1 futuro con energia limpia. Eviten un error que dure otros 50 alios. ...
Miembro de la Comisi6n:
. Desarrollen una estrategia que reemplace energia tomando en cuenta a la Ciudad y las
opiniones del publico
. Adopten una estrategia de energia que euente con el desatToIlo de energia limpia, reno-
vable y conservaci6n
. Si es necesario el reemplazo de esta planta con otra pequefta, entonees les pedimos que
cuente con la tecnoIogia de enfiiamiento por aire y que Ios impaetos del aire eontamina-
do no amenacen la salud de 105 residentes vecinos ni a los estudiantes de las escuelas.
\tentamente~
Nombre' .-. .." .'~.' ...,.... '. . ,;"".,.= " C,' --';'" f. '-"~;;':;.<t
Direcci6n lJ.'1 r; Zo8~ Sf. ~
Ciudad C. \( Estado A C6digo Postal lOJ i /
T e!efo"" ~0 3-1 q '} (3;;orreo-electr6nico
Autorizo eI U90 de uti nombre en publico como apoyo a Ia postura mencionada en ia parte superior. Para mas infOnnaci6n comunfm...'U'
Nm 1~ rn~"";A.. ,1..('_1..... ._'-,__... _. '''''^' ._. ____ ..
Estimados Miembros de la Comisi6n del Puerto de San Diego,
La actual pJanta de energia de la Bahia Sur es una instalacion anticuada e ineficiente la cual
ha contaminado la parte occidente de ChuJa Vista desde los anos sesentas. Hay miles de personas
y bastantes escue(as que se encuentran en direccion del viento de Ja planta. Tengo entendido que
se estAn Uevando a cabo negociaciones para decidir el futuro de la planta y en base de esto les
insto, a ustedes los Comisionados del Puerto, a que desarroUen Wl3 estrategia para reemplazar la ~
energia la coal contenga la eliminacion de la actual planta sin reemplazarla con otra igual en Jas ~
zonas cercanas. Esta es una oportunidad para la prevencion de decadas de contaminaci6n y se- I
guir en busca de un futuro con energia limpia. Eviten un error que dure otros 50 anos.
Miembro"-de Is Comisi6o:
. Desarrollen una estrategia que reempJace energia tomando en cuenta a la Ciudad y las
opiniones del publico
. Adopten una estrategia de energia que cuente con el desarrollo de energia limpia, ren(}-
vable y conservacion
. Si es necesario el reemplazo de esta planta con otra pequefia, entonces les pedimos que
cuente con la tecnologia de enftiamiemo por aire y que los impactos del aire contamina-.
do no enacen 1a sal de los re . entes vecinos ni a Jos estudiantes de las escueJas.
Atentame
Nombre
Direcci6n
Ciudad
Telefono .~
AWJrizo eI iJSO de mi nombre en publico como apoyo. I. postura mencionada en 1a parte:~. Para masi.nformaci6n comuniquese
conta CoaIiciOnde Salud Ambieo1al aI(619) 474-0220. 401 Mile of Cars Way. Suite 310. National City. CA919S0.
--
Dear Commissioners ofthe Port of San Diego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that has
been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. There are thousands of people and
numerous schools in the area immediately downwind of the power plant. I understand
that negotiations are currently underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polluting
power plant near the same place. This is an opportunity to prevent decades of pollution
and pursue a clean energy future. Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
Commissioners, pleaSe:
. Develop an-energy replacement strategy with input from the City and the public.
. Adopt an ener_gy strategy that relies on development of clean, renewable energy and
conservation
. If a small replacement power plant is needed, it should he air cooled and air pollution
impacts should not threaten neighboring residents or schools.
Sincerely, _.. .......... . ._ . _
~~::ss ~ At/~
City C V- State (A Zip q /q/ /
Phone GttJ)1f7.LJ-o?df_Email
iff ~..
I give permissioo to use my name in public to support the above position. For more infonnation contact
Environmental Health Coalitioo(619) 474.Q220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950.
Dear Commissioners of the Port of San Diego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that has
been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. There are thousands of people and
numerous schools in the area immediately downwind of the power plant. I understand
that negotiations are currently underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polluting
power plant near the same place. This is an opportunity to prevent decades of pollution
and pursue a clean energy future. Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
Commissioners, please:
. Develop an energy replacement strategy with input ttom the City and the public.
. Adopt an energy strategy that relies on development of clean, renewable energy and
conservation
If a small replacement power plant is needed, it should be air cooled and air pollution
impacts should not threaten neighboring residents or schools.
i
I
tt\t~
;. I
Smcere y, .,
Name
~ Address l1~"- '" (1)C"I{..\I!W'"
City
Phone~it-~rO/n
~\L11 \
e "VJ ( p. uJ)'Y)
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619)474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City. CA 91950.
,
Dear Commissioners ofthe Port of San Diego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that has
been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. There are thousands of people and
numerous schools in the area immediately downwind of the power plant. I understand
that negotiations are currently underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
egy that tearS down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polluting
power plant near the same place. This is an opportunity to prevent decades of pollution
and pursue a clean energy future. Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
Commissioners, please:
. Develop an eoergy replaCement strategy with input from the City and the public.
. Adopt an energy strategy that relies on development of clean, renewable energy and
conservation
. If a small replacement power plant is needed, it should be air cooled and air pollution
impacts should oot threaten neighboring residents or scbools.
I
ttt~
Sincerely,
Name /
Address (oq? (;..J~ ~
CityQ\^'o~,)<,..~ State !",Zip '7fCJI/
Phune 4'"1 -'7 c, )"> Email
I give permission to use my name in pubJic to support the above position. For more information coo-tact
Environmental Health Coalition (619)474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way. Snite 310, Natiooal City, CA 91950.
veal- .....ummlSSlonen 01 tDe Yort or San Diego, vI u",:::>
Tee existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that has
been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. There are thousands of people and
numerous schools in the area immediately downwind of the power plant. I understand
that negotiations are currently underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polluting
power plant near the same place. This is an opportunity to prevent decades of pollution
and pursue a clean energy future. Please don't make another 50 year mist'!fsP.
Commissioners, please:,___
. Develop an energy replacement strategy with input from the City and the public.
. Adopt an energy strategy that relies on development of c1ea~ renewable energy and
conservation
. Ifa smaU replacement power plant is needed, it shohJd be air cooled and air pollution
impacts should not threaten neighboring resid or schools.
t't ~..
I give permission to use my name in blic to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental HeaJth Coalition (61 474-0220,401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950.
-_....~------
,'~
Dear Commissioners of the Port of San Diego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that has
been polluting western ChuIa Vista since the 1960s. There are thousands of people and
numerous schools in the area immediately downwind of the power plant. I understand
that negotiations are currently underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polluting
power plant near the same place. This is an opportunity to prevent decades of pollution
and pursue a clean energy future. Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
Commissioners, please:
. Develop an energy replacement strategy with input trom the City and the puhlic.
. Adopt an ~nt;rgy strategy that relies on development of clean. renewable energy and
conservation
. If a small replacement power plant is needed, it should be air cooled and air pollution
impacts shoultl not threaten neighhoring residents or schools.
,t, ~.,
Sincerely,
Name
Address ' "
City State c..Rr Zip "fI '" \\
I(,t?~ - Eroail ~lIii""',-\,^-k-.e.5c\cCllbl' Or!)
It.~ion to use y name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Enviroomental Heatth oalitioo (619) 47~220, 401 Mile of Cars Woy, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950.
.J
Estimados Miembros de la ,Comision del Puerto de San Diego,
La actual planta de energfa de la Bahia Sur es uua instalaci6n anticuada e ineficiente la cual
ha contamiuado la parte occidente de Chula Vista deade los aDos sesentas. Hay miles de personas
y bastantes escuelas que se encuentran en direcci6n del viento de la planta. Tengo entendido que
se esmn llevando a cabo negociaciones para decidir el futuro de la planta y en base de esto Ies
insto. a ustedes los Comisionados del Pu~o, a que desarrollen una estrategia para reempIazar la
energfa la cual contenga la eliminaci6n de la actual planta sin reemplazarla con otra igual en las
zonas cercanas. Esta es lUla oportunidad para la prevenci6n de decadas de contaminaci6n y se~
guir en busca de lUl futuro con energia limpia. Eviten un error que dure otros 50 alios.
Miembro de la Comision:
. DesatTollen lU18 estrategia que reemplace energia tomando en cUenta a la Ciudad y I<\S
opiniones del publico
. Adopten una estra.tegia de energia que cuente con el desarrollo de energia Iimpia, reno-
vable y conservact6n
. Si es necesario el reemplazo de esta planta con otra pequena, entonces les pedimoo que
cuente con la tecnologfa de enftiamiento per aire y que los impactos del aire contamina-
do no a~enacen la salud de los residentes vecinos ni a 100 estudiantes de las escuelas.
~::s:~~~~)
Ciudad \!..,,-, v . Estado LA. C6digo Postal 'll 9 II
Telefonol/'j.(.,()\1~ Correo-<Jlectr6nico .
..~t~
Autorizo eI uso de mi nombre en publico como apoyo . la postura menciooada en 1. parte superior-. Para mas infurmaci6n COJDUDiquese
cool. CoaliciOnde Salud AmbiemaJ. al (619} 474.0220. 401 Mile of Cars Way. Suite 310. National City. CA91950. .
-._---
-------~__._...~c
Dear Commissioners ofthe Port of San Diego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that has
been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s, There are thousands of people and
numerous schools in the area immediately downwind ofthe power. plant. I understand
that negotiations are currently underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large poJIuting
power plant near the same place. This is an opportunity to prevent decades of pollution
and.pursue a.clean energy future. Please don't make another'5Uyearmistake.
Commissioners, please:
. Develop an energy replacement strategy with input trom the City and the public.
. Adopt an energy strategy that relies on development of clean, renewable energy and
conservation
. ]f a small replacement power plant is needed, it should be air cooled and air pollution
impacts sho~,hi not threaten neighboring residents or schools.
.' I REc:?,wf) MAR 15 Z/IOO
. .
4-''t "'~:~
v. "~
te t!.A Zip 9/9/0
.\i:-iI r~I-'-"!,",cW~~~ ,~
....~~ =~':,y~.lllllliicto~veM9!!i"'l-iJ!!._iJ!JJIrmatioo cootact
",. n dJ~20';':ro:t'Fdilhf'Cmj~~:I11\!mftooalCity,CA91950.
Ji:stimados Miembros de la ComisioD del Puerto de Sa 0 Diego,
La actual plauta de energia de la Bahia Sur es una instalaci6n anticuada e ineficiente fa cual
ha contaminado la parte occidente de Chula Vista desde 105 aftos sesentas. Hay miles de personas
y bastantes escuelas que se encuentran en direccion del viento de la planta. Tengo entendido que
se estAn llevando a cabo negociaciones para decidir e1 futuro de la planta y en base de esto les
insto. a ustedes los Comisionados del Puerto, a que desaJTOllen una estrategia para reemplazar la
energia la cual contenga la e1iminacion de la actual pIauta sin reemplazarla con otra igual en las
zonas cercanas. Esta es Wla oportunidad para la prevencion de decadas de contaminacion y se-
guir en busea de un futuro con energia )impia. Ev;ten un error que dure Otr08 50 anos.
Miembro de Ja ComisiOn:
. DesaITollen una estrategia que reemplace energia tomando en cuenta a la Ciudad y las
opiniones del publico
. Adopten una estrategia de energia que cuente con el desarrollo de energia limpia, reno-
vable y conservacion
. Si es necesario el reemplazo de esta planta con otra pequefia, entonces Ies pedimos que
cuente con la tecnologia de enftiatniento par aire y que 10s impactos de] aire contamina-
do no amenacen la salud de 105 residentes vecinos ni a 10s estudiantes de las escuelas.
jtt~
\tentame~te, '.'" .' < ..
Nombre . . .." ,. ,~. · . I . ~\..,
Direccion' <1 \ (
Ciudad ( \1 "Ie. II, cj<!Estado cA C6digoPostal ~)( '1(/
Telefon<fc;'r(r) -'(ZSSo7,coITeo-electr6nico
AuIorizo eluso de mi norobre en publico como apoyo a]a postva mencionada en la plll1e superior. Para mas infunnaciOO comuniquese
conla Coalicionde Salud ArobientaI aI (619) 474.Q220. 401 Mile of Cars Way. Suite 310, National City. CA 91950.
~~---
Estimados Miembros de 18 Comisi6n del Puerto de SaD Diego,
La actual planta de energia de la Bahia Sur es una instalaci6n anticuada e ineficiente la cual
ha contaminado la parte occidente de Chula Vista desde 10s ailos sesentas. Hay miles de personas
y bastantes escuelas que se encuentran en direccion del viento de la planta. Tengo entendido que
se estan llevando a cabo negociaciones para decidir el futuro de la planta y en base de eslo les
insto, a ustedes los Comisionados del Puerto, a que desarrollen una estrategia para reemplazar la
energia la cool contenga la eliminaci6n de la actual planta sin reemplazarla con otra igual en las
zonas cercanas. Esta es una oportunidad para la prevenci6n de decadas de contaminaci6n y se-
guir en busca de un futuro con energia limpia. Eviten un error que dure otr09 50 anos.
Miembro de la ComisiOo:
. Desarrollen una estrategia que reemplace energia tomando en cuenta a la Ciudad y Las
opiniones del publico
. Adopten una eStrategia de energia que cuente con el desarrollo de energia limpia, reno-
vable y conservaci6n
. Si es necesario el reemplazo de esta planta con otra peqUeDa, entonees )es pedimos que
cuente con la tecnologia de enfiiamiento par Dire y que los impactos del aire contamina-
do no amenacen la salud de los residentes vecinos ni a los estudiantes de las escueJas.
Atentamente r?
Nombre;7 \.Jt<~,,' 'ir
Direcci6n Q;'1 DOt:
Ciudad CN
Telefono
ttt~
ve
o (p.. C6digo Postal q / '1 II
o-electr6nico
A1torizo el uso de mi nombre en publico 00100 apoyo a ia postura menciooada en Ia parte Jt4)erior. Para mas infurmaciOn comuniquese
conla CoaliciOnde Salud Ambiental aI (619) 474.()220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, Natiooal City. CA 91950.
Dear Commissioners oftbe Port of San Diego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficieot and outdated facility that has
been polluting western Chula Vista sioce the 1960s. There are thousands of people and
numerous schools in the area immediately downwind of the power plant. I understand
that negotiations are currently underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement stmt-
egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large pollutiog
power plant near the same place, This is an opportunity to prevent decades of poJlution
and pursue a clean energy future. Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
Commissiooers, please:
. Develop an energy replacement strategy with input from the City and the public.
. Adopt an energy strategy that relies on development of clean. renewable energy and
conservation
. If a small replacement power plant is needed, it should be air cooled and air pollution
impacts should not threaten neighboring residents or schools.
Siocerely,
Name
Address
City
Phone
I give permission to use my n in public to support the above position. For more infonnation contact
Environmental Health Coati on (619) 474,.Q220, 401 Mile orCars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA91950.
r
"----._---
Estimados MieDlbros de la Comision del Puerto de San Diego,
La actual planta de energia de Ia Bahia Sur es una instalacion anticuada e ineficiente la cual
ha contaminado la parte occidente de Chula Vista desde 105 afios sesentas. Hay miles de personas
y bastantes escuelas que se encuentran en direcci6n del viento de la planta. Tengo entendido que
se estan lIevando a cabo negociaciones para decidir el futuro de la planta y en base de esto les
inslo, a ustedes 108 Comisionados del Pnerto, a qne desarrollen una estralegia para reemplazar la
energfa la cual contenga la eliminaci6n de la actual planta sin reemplazarla con otra igual en las
zonas cercanas. Esta es una oportunidad para la prevenci6n de d6cadas de contaminaci6n y se-
guir en busca de un futuro con energia limpia. Eviten un error que dure otros 50 anos.
Miembro de la Comisioo:
. DesaITollen una estrategia que reemplace energfa tornando en cuenta a la Ciudad y las
opiniones del publico
, Adopten una estrategia de energia que coente con el desarrollo de energia limpia, reno-
vable y conservacion
Si es necesario eI reemplazo de esta planta con otra pequeil.a, entonces les pedimos que
cuente con la tecnologfa de enftiamiento por aire y que los impactos del aire contamina-
do no amenacen la salud de los residentes vecinos ni a los estudiantes de las escuelas.
\tentament~
.. "'" ".., ,ft<
Nombre . ,. <-~~.. - -~_ :",,,"c;,,$F
Direcci6n \ C OL.c>~~' .b.'\;- .
Ciudad C !,\O,-? Q\'\'I1> Estado t'!) C6digo Postal
TeIefono ,-\'"20 1(:)'-1 Correo-electr6nico
ttt..~
.'
Autorizo eJ uso de mi nombre en ptJblico como apoyo a la postura menciooada en la parte ~or. Para mas informaciOn comuniquese
con 1:1 Cn<llirilonA.-fi1."hvi Am!.;"",,,1 "I U;IO\ "".! n'YIn ..n, ...r.._ nf't"'n_ '<I'n" ('..:._ ..,n ...._.:__A' t"':.... ..... n,n"n
Estimados Miembros de la Comision del Puerto de San Diego,
La actual planta de energia de la Bahfa Sur es una instalaci6n anticuada e ineficiente la cual
ha contaminado la parte oceidente de Chula Vista desde los aDos sesentas. Hay miles de personas
y bastantes escuelas que se encuentran en direcci6n del viento de ]a p(anta. Tengo entendido que
se estin Uevando a cabo negociaciones para decidir el futuro de Ia planta y en base de esto les
IDsto, a ustedes los Comisionados del Puerto, a que desarrollen lD18 estrategia para reemplazar la
energia ]a cual contenga la eliminaci6n de la actual planta sin reemplazaria con otra igual en las
zonas cercanas. Esta es una oportunidad para la prevenci6n de decadas de contaminaci6n y se-
guir en busea de 1ID futuro con energia limpia. Eviten un error que dure otros 50 alios.
Miembro de la Comision:
. Desarrollen lU18 estrategia que reemplace energia tomando en cuenta a la Ciudad y las
opiniones del publico
. Adopten una estrategia de energia que cuente con el desarrollo de energia limpia, reno-
vable y conservaci6n
. Si es necesario el reemplazo de esta plauta con otra pequefia, entonces les pedimos que
cuente con la tecnologia de enfiiamiento par aire y que los impactos del aire contamina-
do no amenacen la salud de los residentes vecinos ni a los estudiantes de Ias escuelas.
Ii ~..
Atentamen):? .. . . ..
Nombre.~
Direccion 51. . ~ 1 . ... iz"~ik1 ct
Cindad C i1 iA l t;' ~ hi Estado Lei. C IgO Postal C; 191 S-
Telefono {(P /IJ :3~,.19~-electr6nico
Aurorizo e1 uso de mi oombre en publioo como apoyo ala postura mencKmada enla pate~. Para mas inhmaci6n oomunfq~
conla Coa1ici6nde Salud Ambieo1al al (619) 474-0220,401 Mile of Cars Way. Suite 310, Natiooal City. CA91950.
Estimados Miembros de Ia Comisi6o del Puerto de San Diego,
La actual planta de energia de la Bahia Sur es una instalaci6n anticuada e ineficiente (a cual
ha contaminado la parte occidente de Chula Vista desde los alios sesentas. Hay miles de personas
y bastantes escuelas que se encuentran en direcci6n del viento de la planta. Tengo entendido que
se estAn llevando a cabo negociaeiones para decidir el futuro de la planta y en base de esto Les
insto, a ustedes los Comisionados del Puerto, a que desarroUen una estrategia para reemplazar la
energfa 18 cuaI contenga )a eliminaci6n de la actual planta sin reemplazarla con otra iguaI en las
zonas cercanas. Esta es una oportunidad para la prevenci6n de decadas de contaminaci6n y se-
guir en busca de un futuro con energfa limpia. Eviten un error que dure otros 50 anos.
Miembro de I. ComisiOn:
. Desarrollen una estrategia que reemplace energia tomando en cuenta a la Ciudad y !as
opiniones del publico
. Adopten una estrategia de energia que cuente con el desarrollo de energfa limpia. reno-
vable y conservaci6n
. Si es necesario e] reemplazo de esta p
cuente con la tecnologia de enmami
do no amenacen la salud de los resi
con oira pequefta. entonces les pedimos que
o par aire y que los impactos del aire contamina-
ntes vecinos ni a 105 estudiantes de las escuelas.
fti~
\tentamente,
Nombre
Direcci6n
Ciudad5>.tA ~,:'Q?J
Telefono u
o
~..A COdigo Postal ~/:;</
lectr6nico
AIIorizo eI uso de mi DDDibre eD publico como apoyo a Ia postln mencionada en Ia parte ~_ Para masinfcnnaci6n oomuniquese
coolaCoaliciOnde SalIMi Ambiettalal (619)474-0220. 401 Mile of Cars Way. Swtc310_ NalinnBl Citv. CA Q1IXR
Estimados Miem bros de la Comision del Puerto de San Diego,
La actual planta de energia de la Bahia Sur es una instalaci6n anticuada e ineficiente la coal
ba contamiuado la parte occideDle de Cbuta Vista desde los afios sesentas. Hay miles de personas
y bastantes escuelas que se encuentran en direcci6n del viento de la planta. Tengo entendido que
se estAn Hevando a cabo negociaciones para decidir el futuro de la plauta y en base de esto les
insto, a ustedes los Comisionados del Puerto, a que desarroHen una estrategia para reemplazar la
energia ]a cual contenga la eliminaci6n de la actual planta sin reemplazarla con otra igual en Ias
zo~s cercanas. Esta es una oportuni~d ~ la prevenci6n de decadas de contaminaci6n y se- I'::
gwr en busca de un futuro con energia IImpIa. Eviten un error que dure otros 50 afios. )
Miembro de la Com.ision: f
. DesarroUen una estrategia que reemplace energia tomando en cuenta a,la Ciudad y I~
opiniones del publico
. Adopten una estrategia de energia que cuente con eI desarroJJo de energia limpia, reno-
vable y conservaci6n \
. Si es necesario el reemplazo de esta planta con otra pequefta, entonces les pedimos que
cuente con la tecnoIogia de enftiamiento par aire y que los impactos del sire contamina-
do no amenacen la salud de los residentes vecinos ni a Ios estudiantes de !as escuelas.
Atentam
Nombre I
Direccion l
Ciud ' COdigo Postal9.-:;). fS9
T eJefon " . Correo-electronico
AWIrizo eI usa de au 00 en p~~1w "kYO ~~ J;nciooada eo 13 parte superioc. Para mas infonnaci6n comuniquese
coo la CoaIici6n de Salud Amblental aI (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950.
.\-_..
~stimados Miembros de la Comisioo del Puerto de San Diego,
La actual planta de energia de ]a Bahia Sur es una instalaci6n anticuada e inefidente la cual
!a contaminado la parte occidente de Chula Vista desde 105 aDos sesentas. Hay miles de personas
_ J bastantes escuelas que se encuentran en direcci6n del viento de la planta. Tengo entendido que
"i estAn Ilevando a cabo negociaciones para decidir eJ futuro de la planta y en base de esto les
Isto, a ustedes los Comisiooados del Puerto, a que desarrollen una estrategia para reempIazar Ia
~ergia 13 cual contenga Ia eliminacion de la actual planta sin reemplazarla con otra igual en las
ooas cercanas. Esta es una oportunidad para la prevenci6n de decadas de contaminaci6n y se~
b en busca de un futuro con energia limpia. Eviten un error que dure otros 50 aiios.
.~Iiembro de la Comision:
, . Desarrollen una estrategia que reemplace energia tomando en cuenta a la Ciudad y las
'- opiniones del publico
. Adopten una estrategia de energia que cuente con el desarrollo de energia limpia, reno-
vable y conservaci6n
. Si es necesario el reemplazo de esta planta con otra pequefia, entonces les pedimos que
cuente con la tecnologia de enftiamiento ,par aire y que los impactos del aire contamina-
do no amenacen la salud de 105 residentes vecinos ni a los estudiantes de las escuelas.
\tentamente, _
Nombre~11 ... ..1.'
Direcci6n-:>15 j/);4f.Les 57
Ciudad C:: V Estado ell COdigo Postal 9 Ie; / (
Telefuno(o('t '11 C. /L(1oCorreo-electr6nico
~i~
Amorizo eI use de mi nombre en publico como apoyo a 18 posrura meuciooada eo la parte superi<<. Para mas~ comuniquese
r....l..r""I;,..;;"nd..c:..I..d .!I~J.O_.~1 ~I/I;'f>' ................. ...., -....,.,_ _~,..~_ ...~.. <'...:._..,.. "'_'"'___. ,..;.... ,... n.n.."
Dear Commissioners of the Port of San Diego, , ,,""'"
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that has' ,';;,JiII'
been polluting western Chula Vista since the ]960s. There are thousands of people and ,,'"
numerous schools in the area iImnediately downwind of the power plant. I understand"i~;'
that negotiations are currently underway to decide, tbe future of the South Bay P~'\"~;;,,,
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement straM'"
egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it'Wlth another large polluting
power plant near the same place. This is an opportunity to prevent decades of pollution
and pursue a clean energy future, Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
Commissioners, please:
. Develop an energy replacement s1rategy with input nom the City and the public.
. Adopt an energy strategy that relies on development of clean, renewable energy and
conservation .
~ If a small replacement power plant is needed, it should be air cooled and air poUntion
impacts shnuld not threaten neighboring residents "R'tft!Y ED MA 006
Sincerely,
Name
Address
City
Phone q
A '/',
I ,
t ""'-'
. .-,..
I give permission to use ~f;name in publjc.tO'.suppOft the above position. For more in,f~ contact
Environmental Heolth Co.illtion (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile ofCID'S Way, Snite 310, Nali" "'ity, CA 91950.
~-_.-
--_."------------
--..----
f
Estimados Miembros de la Comisi6n del Puerto de San Diego,
La actual pIanta de energia de la Bahia Sur es una instalaci6n anticuada e ineficiente la cual
ha contaminado la parte occidente de Chula Vista desde los afios sesentas. Hay miles de personas
y bastantes escuelas que se encuenuan en direcci6n del viento de la planta. Tengo entendido que
se estAn IIevando a cabo negociaciones para decidir el futmo de la planta y en base de esto les
"\ insto, a ustedes los Comisionados del Puerto, a que desarTollen una estrategia para reemplazar la
, energia la coal contenga la eliminaci6n de la actual planta sin reemplazarla con otra igual en las
) zonas cercanas. Esta es una oportunid8d para la prevenci6n de decadas de contaminaci6n y se-
guir en busca de un futuro con energia limpia. Eviten un error que dure Otr08 50 0008.
Miembro de la Comision:
. Desarrollen una estrategia que reemplace energia tomando en cuenta a la Ciudad y las
opiniones del publico
. Adopten una estrategia de energia que cuente con el desarrollo de energia limpia, reno- .
vahle y conservaci6n
. Si es necesario el reemplazo de esta planta con otra pequeila, entonces les pedimos que
cuente con la te~nologia de enfiiamiento por aire y que los impactos del aire contamina-
l do no amenacen la salud d~ los residentes vecinos ni a Jos estudiantes de las escuelas.
tt~
,tentament
Nombre
Direcci6n
~iudad / Z" ;7 . < I, Estado /- C6digo Postal 9'/"9/;-,
Telefono?) 9'/ .-J/ C/ 1 Correo-electr6nico
Autorizo eJ usa dr; mi DOmbre en publico como apoyo a la posnn meocionada eo 1& parte superior. Para mas jnfonnaci6ta comunfquese
conla CoaliciiJa de Salud Ambiental at (619)474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way. Suite 310. National City. CA 91950. *
uear l..OmmlSsIODers 01 IDe ran OJ
The existing South Bay Powe' .. ill,. .nd outdated facility :hat has
been poIJuting western Chula' . . .de 1960s. L "are thousands ofpe.ople and
numerous schools in the arer ...diately dO"l1wind of the'!"""'er plant. I ur.lderstan,
that negotiations are curreiltIy underway to decide the future ofu., South p,ay Pow,
Plant. I strongly urge fte Port Commissioners to develop an energy replace' ment stra:
egy that tears down the cUf):ent plant but does not replace it with anoth., larg e polluti"
power pl\!llt near the same place. This is an opportunity to prevent decaties "f polJuti
and pursue a clean energy future. Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
CommissIoners, pleas?~ .
. Deve]op an energy replacement strategy with input from the City and the puiDlic.
. Adopt an energy strategy that relies on development of clean, renewable ene-I<gy and
conservation
o If a small replacement power plant is needed, it should be air cooled ana.it pollution
impacts should not threaten neighboring residents or schools.
K~~ ~92006~
. -WI
I ",
ttL,~,~
Sincerely,
Name
Addres 0"
City . State (' t4- Zip 11 rt/ /
Phon(M9J ~:Jo-'N I 'J... Email ,j y l3i4r<>R-tf .t.! 'I f!PfloL
I give permission to use my name in public to support the above-position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 91950.
Dear Commissioners ofthe Port of San Diego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that has
been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. There are thousands of people and
numerous schools in the area immediately downwind of the power plant. I understand
that negotiations are curtently underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polluting
power plant near the same place. This is an opportunity to prevent decades of pollution
and pursue a clean energy future. Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
Commissioners, please:
o Deve]op an energy replacement strategy with input ITom the City and the public.
. Adopt an energy strategy that relies on development of clean, renewable energy and
conservation
. If a small replacement power plant is needed, it should be air cooled and air pollution
s~~W8"f~
A?dre~n ke
City CY "k \J ~ "j1q State r A Ztp q 19 II
Phone Lj'Zl-7.)rJtJ Email
I give pennission to use my name in public to support the above position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalition (619) 474.Q220, 401 Mile ofCm Way, Suile 310, National City, CA 91950,.
Dear Commissioners of the Port of San Diego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility th t h
been polluting western Chula Yista s~nce the 1960s. There are thousands ofpeop~ an~
numerous sc?ools III the area unmediately downwind of the power plant. I understand
that negotiatIOns are currently underway to decide the future of the South Ba P w
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacem:nt ~~
...... egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polluting
~ power plant near the same place. This is an opportunity to prevent decades of pollution
and pursue a clean energy future. Please don't make another 50 year mistake.
Commissioners, please:
) . Develop an energy replacement strategy with input from the City and the public.
o Adopt an eoergy strategy that relies on development of clean, renewable energy and
conservation
. If a small replacement power plant is needed, it should be air cooled and air pollution
unpacts should not threaten neighboring residents or schools.
I &ILl
ftt~
>f
Estimados Miembros de 18 Comision del Puerto de San Diego,
) La actual planta de energia de la Bahia Sur es una instalaci6n anticuada e ineficiente ]a cool
~ contaminado la parte accidente de Chula Vista desde los aftos sesentas. Hay miles de personas
y bastantes escue]as que se encuentran en direcci6n de] viento de]a planta. Tengo entendido que
~e estan llevando a cab~ ~egociaciones para decidir el futuro de la planta y en base de esto les
tosto, a ustedes los ComlslOnados del Puerto, a que desarrollen una estrategia para reemplazar la
energia ]a cua] contenga la eliminaci6n de la actual planta sin reemp]azar]a con otIa igual en ]as
zo~ cercanas. Esta es una oportunidad para la prevenci6n de decadas de contaminaci6n y se-
gwr en busca de un futuro con energia limpia. Eviten un error que dure otros 50 anos.
:tIiembro de la ComisiOn:
.. Desarrollen lUl8 estrategia que reemplace energia tomando en cuenta a la Ciudad y las
opiniones del publico
Adopten una estrategia de energia que cuente con el desarrollo de energia limpia, reDO-
.... vable y conservacion
Si es necesario el reemplazo de esta planta con otra pequeila, entonces les pedimos que
cuente con la tecnologia de enftiamiento por aire y que los impactos del aire contamina-
do no amenacen la salud de los residentes vecinos ni alas estudiantes de ]as escuelas.
~~=:te(~~+~#
Ciudad C#t/lA- i//~ Estado C/1 . C6digo Postal '1/7';l)
? Telc!fono 7l>7-o.:3 Di Correo-electr6nico
.. Aurorizo el uso de ani nombre en publico como apoyo a Ia postura mencionada en Ia parte superior. Para mas informaci6n COIDUIlfquese
........ I~ r...~I;...i'<'n..l. <;'~I..... A._'-'__._. _. fL''''' A",A n......n An. ...,L .......___ .,,_._ "'_.,.. ..,.., u..,___. .....~_ ,.... n......"
,tt.~
JJear commissioners of tbe Port of San Diego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that has
been polluting western Chula Vista since the 1960s. There are thousands of people and
numerous schools in the area immediately downwind of the power plant. I understand
that negotiations are currently underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Conunissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polluting
power plant near the same place. This is an opportunity to prevent decades of pollution
and purspc a clean energy future. Please don '/ make ana/her 50 year mistake.
Commissioners, please: .
. Develop an energy replacement strategy with input :tram the City and the public.
o Adopt an energy strategy that relies on development of clean, renewable energy and
conservation
. If a small replacement power plant is needed, it should be air cooled and air pollution
impacts should Dot threaten neighboring residents or schools.
Sincerely,
Name .:::rAm. e:r J+ f\- (l D \',( \\,J
Address (.)1, C.d "let!- Dc) [\-1/ I';
cityc.ll.\.l.... \I. ~+A- State Co. Zip 9\1 I (
Phone Ernail
ttt~
I give permission to use my Dame in public to support the above position. For more infonnation contact
Environmental Health Coalition (6t9) 474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CI\ 91950.
- ___u______ ____
Dear Commissioners oftbe Port of San Diego,
The existing South Bay Power Plant is an inefficient and outdated facility that has
been polluting western Chula Vista since the I 960s. There are thousands of people and
numerous schools in the area immediately downwind of the power plant. I understand
that negotiations are currently underway to decide the future of the South Bay Power
Plant. I strongly urge the Port Commissioners to develop an energy replacement strat-
egy that tears down the current plant but does not replace it with another large polluting
power plant near the same place. This is an opportunity to prevent decades of pollution
ilDd pursue a clean energy future. Please don '/ make ana/her 50 year mistake.
Commissioners, please:
o Develop an energy replacement strategy with input Horn the City and the public.
. Adopt an energy strategy that relies on development of clean, renewable energy and
conservation
. If a small replacement power plant is needed, it should be air cooled and air pollution
impacts shouJd not threaten neighboring residents or schools.
>ineerely,
Name
Address
City CA/
Phone
I give permission to use my name in public to support the abo position. For more information contact
Environmental Health Coalitioo (619)474-0220, 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310. Natiooal City, CA 91950.
Estimados Miembros de la Comisioo del Puerto de San Diego,
La actual planta de energia de la Bahia Sur es una instalaci6n anticuada e ineficiente la uaI
ha contaminado la parte occideote de ChuJa Vista desde Ios aDos sesenlas. Hay miles de pers~nas
y bas:t~s esc~elas queb se enc~en~ en direcCi?D. del viento de la planta. Tengo entendido que
~ es cvan 0 a ca ~ ~egoclacIOnes para decl(fir el futuro de la planta y en base de esto les
lDStO, a ustedes .105 COmJSIO~d~s d~l Puert.o, a que desarrollen una estrategia para reemplazar la
energia Ia cual contenga la ehnunacI6n de la actual planta sin reempJazarJa con otra igual en las
ZO?as cercanas. Esta es una oportunidad para ]a prevencion de d6eadas de contaminaci6n se-
gUlf en busea de un futuro con energia Jimpia. Eviten un error que dure otr08 50 alios. Y
Miembro de la Comision:
. Desarrollen una estrategia que reemplace energia tomando en euenta a 1a Ciudad y la,
opiniones del publico
. Adopten una estra.t~gia de energia que cuente con el desarrollo de energia limpia, reno-
vable y conservaclOn
. Si es necesario eI reemplazo de esta planta con otra pequciia, entonces les pedimos que
euente con la tecnologia de en:tiiamiento por aire y que los impactos del aire contamina-
do no amenacen la salOO de 108 residentes vecinos ni alas estudiantes de las escuelas.
ftt~
AutOrizo el. ~ de mi oombre ~D publico como apoyo a Ia postwa menciooada en la parte ~or. Para mas informaciOn comuniquese
conla CoaLiCl6n de Salud Amblemal aI (6J9) 474-0220. 401 Mile of Cars Way, Suite 310, National City, CA 9J950.
"_~_._m.__
-~._._-
Estimados Miembros de Is Common del Puerto de San Diego,
La actual planra de energia de la Bahia Sur es una instaJaci6n anticuada e ineficiente la cual
ha contamioado la parte occidente de ChuIa VISta desde Ios ailos sesentas. Hay miles de personas
y bastantes escuelas que se encuentran en direcci6n del viento de la planta. Tengo entendido que
estAn Ilevando a cabo negociaciones para decidir eI futuro de la planta y en base de esto les
11Sto, a ustedes 105 Comisionados del Puerto, a que desarrollen una estrategia para reemplazar la
:\energ{a la cuaL contenga la eliminacion de la actual planta sin reemplazarla con otra igual en las
00nas cerc8Il8S. Esta es una oportunidad para la prevenci6n de decadas de contaminad6n y se-
guir en busca de un futuro con energia limpia. Eviten un error que dure otros 50 aiios.
Miembro de Ia Comisioa:
. Desarrollen una estrategia que reemplace energia tomando en cuenta a la Ciudad y las
opiniones del publico
. Adopten tma estrategia de energia que cuente con el desarrollo de energia Jimpia, reno-
vable y conservacion
. Si es necesario el reemplazo de esta planta con otra pequefia, entonces les pedimos que
cuente con la tecnologia de enfiiamiento por aire y que 105 impactos del airecontamina_
do no amenacen Ia salud de 105 residentes vecinos ni a los estudiantes de las escuelas.
Atentamente~..
~;:~:n "7'2'"" w ~'"' i'tif.
Ciudadc'lIuLflr/i" "/ff Estado <:f!L C6digoPostal? I'll f
TeIefuno $'r!; -l t I{(, Correo-electr6nico
ftt~
AtIorizo eI usa de mi nombre en publico como apoyo a J. posttalI menciOlllda CD Ja plM1e~. PIrIIDISi:nfurmaci6n eomuoiquese
COIIIaCoaliciim....!':..hVl4m..;_..I..I/i:.IB~"..A ........" .,,, ...,._ _"... ~. _.. ___ ... . _. _