Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcc min 1982/10/26 MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA Held Tuesday, October 26, 1982 The City Council met in the Council Chamber at the Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue On the above date at 7 p.m. with the following Councilmen present: Cox, McCandliss, Scott, Malcolm, Moore Councilmen absent: None ADJOURNMENT The Mayor adjourned the meeting at 11:10 p.m. until Thursday, October 28, 1982 at 4 p.m. in the Council Conference Room, City Hall, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, California. I, Jennie M. Fulasz, City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista~ DO HEREBY CERTIFY that this is a full, true and correct copy of an order by the City Council at the meeting of October 26, 1982 o Chula Vista, Calif nia STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING ORDER COUNTY OF S~q DIEGO ) ss OF ADJOU~N~.~NT OF ~ETING CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) I, Jennie M. Fulasz, being first duly sworn depose and say: That I am the duly chosen, qualified and acting City Clerk of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista; That the regular meeting of the Council of the City of Chula Vista was held Tuesday, October 26, 1982 and said meeting was adjourned to the time and place specified in the order of adjournment ATTACHED HERET0: That on Wednesday, October 27, 1982 at the hour of 10:00 a.m. I posted a copy of said order at a conspicuous place on or near the door of the place at which said me~ting of October 26, 1982 was held. ~ ~~~~ty Clerk Subscribed and sworn to before me this day of 19 Notary Public in and for said County and State of California MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA Tuesday, October 26, 1982 Council Chamber 7:00 p.m. Public Services Building ROLL CALL Councilmen present: Mayor Cox, Councilmembers McCandliss, Moore, Malcolm, Scott Councilmen absent: None Staff present: City Manager Cole, Assistant City Attorney Harron, Assistant City Manager Asmus Pledge of allegiance to the Flag was led by Mayor Cox followed by a moment of silent prayer. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES for the meeting of October 7, 14 and lg, 1982. Mayor Cox asked that an addition be included in the minutes of October 19, on page 13 under item number 17 (Friendship Park}. The motion should include having a suitable commemorative area in Friendship Park. MSUC (Cox/Moore) to approve the minutes as amended. 2. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY (None) 3. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS a. Mrs. Marshall Skinner, 741 Date Avenue, Chula Vista stated that she contacted the California Air Resources Board concerning the pollution emitting from the San Diego Gas and Electric plant. They gave her the telephone number of 1-800-952-5588 which can be called 24 hours a day free of charge for anyone wishing to complain about air pollution. Mrs. Skinner stated that the County Air Pollution Board will be conducting a meeting on October 29 at the Lauderbach Community Center from 7:00 9:00 p.m. at 333 Oxford Street. The purpose of the meeting is to receive comments from the public concerning the scope and nature of the SDG&E p robl em. MSUC (Cox/Scott) for the City Clerk to send a transcript of the concerns of the citizens that have appeared before the City Council regarding the SDG&E problem, as itemized in the minutes of the last two meetings. MSUC (Moore/Malcolm) to send a letter to SDG&E (Task Force) requesting a fact sheet as to their program, the cost factors, explanations, intentions and dates which the Council would be interested in. City Council Meeting - 2 - October 26, 1982 b. James Matherly, 402 Oaklawn Avenue, Chula Vista stated for the record he did not pray nor pledge allegiance to the flag. Mr. Matherly read a statement he presented to the Metropolitan Transit Development Board opposing the money-losing Tijuana Trolley Project and asking for the resignation of Chairperson, Judy Bauer and the General Manager of MTDB. c. Patricia Porter, "I" Street, Chula Vista complained that the people attending the Council meeting of October 19 were not allowed to speak on the Proposition "L" item. Mayor Cox explai ned that the item was an Oral Communication item on which the City Council received a large packet of material. Further, that no one had submitted a request in writing to speak on that item. 4. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS Letter of resignation from Gary Augustine of the Resource Conservation Commission. MSUC (Cox/Moore) to accept the resignation and write a letter of appreciation to Mr. Augustine. Mayor Cox stated that he will move item number 20 (Report on POA & IAFF Impasse) up on the agenda to follow the public hearings if there were no objections from the Council Members. None were voiced. PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES B. Public hearing On the public necessity of acquiring certain right-of-way for public street purposes (Telegraph Canyon Road east of Hilltop Drive) (City Engineer) a. Resolution 11046 Determining and declaring the public necessity of acquiring certain right-of-way for public street purposes known as Telegraph Canyon Road east of Hilltop Drive and authorizing the condemnation proceedings to acquire said right-of-way This being the time and place as advertised, Mayor Cox opened the public hearing. City Engineer Lippitt explained that the City Council budgeted funds last year for the widening of Telegraph Canyon Road between Hilltop Drive and Melrose Avenue which includes providing curb and gutter on the north side of the street between Hill top Drive and Hill top Vista Subdivision and gutter on the south side of the road from Melrose westerly to the existing homes. This will al so provide two travel lanes and two bike lanes in the street for the entire length, plus a parking lane adjacent to the homes at the westerly end of the project. A segment of the roadway which crosses Mr. O'Brien's property was built by the County many years ago to provide two 12' travel lanes only with no bike lane or curbing; the right-of-way was never purchased or dedicated. City Council Meeting - 3 - October 26, 1982 It is the City's position that it has prescriptive rights to the paved portion of that roadway; however, additional right-of-way is needed in order to provide the full street sections, i.e., bike lanes and transition across this property. The City Engineer's recommendation is that the Council find that the public interest and necessity require the acquisition and taking of this certain real property for a street right-of-way. There being no comments either for or against, the public hearing was declared closed. RESOLUTION OFFERED BY COUNCILMAN SCOTT, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously. 6. Public hearing Consideration of amendment to Bonita Glen Specific Plan (continued from meeting of October 12, 1982) (Director of Planning) a. Resolution Approving an amendment to the sign regulation of the Bonita Glen Specific Plan This being the time and place as advertised, Mayor Cox opened the public hearing. Principal Planner Lee submitted graphics and explained that this item was continued from the City Council meeting of October 12, 1982, with a request for staff to meet with the affected property owners to try to obtain a mutually acceptable solution to the sign regulations. This meeting was held and the recommendation of the Director of Planning is for the Council to adopt a motion to amend the Bonita Glen Specific Plan in accordance with Planning Commission Resolution PCM-83~l, with the added provision that ownership "B" shall be entitled to lO0 square feet of freestanding sign area and ownership "C", lO0 square feet, with the added requirement that an easement shall be granted to ownership "C" {Mr. Ferreira) for the purpose of installing and maintaining the 100 square foot sign area at some future date, subject to Planning Commission approval. In the graphic presentation Mr. Lee showed slides noting the freeway traffic on 1-805 going north and south and the visibility of proposed signage areas of 100 sq. ft., 150 sq. ft., and up to 350 sq. ft. In answer to Councilman Malcolm's query, Mr. Lee stated that the Planning Commission did not resolve the issue of moving the sign to the west in the public right-of-way area. However, there are no objections on the part of the staff if the Council approves an encroachment permit. Mr. Frank Ferreira, 270 Bonita Glen Drive, Chula Vista declared that he was disturbed because at that meeting, Mr. Lee declared that he would not change his mind and intends to go along with the present sign recommendation. Mr. Ferreira accused Mr. Lee of "gross distorting of the facts" in presenting the graphics to the Council and noted on two of the slides a different concept of the sign area and location. · 1 T City Council Meeting - 4 - October 26, 1982 Mr. Norman Williams, 3404 Bonita Road, Chula Vista, Planning Consultant, stated that he is representing the three owners, Mr. York, Mr. Ferreira, and Mr. Hart of Shell Oil Company. They have agreed to all of the conditions imposed by the Planning Commission with the exception of the size of the sign. They all concur that they would like a 350 sq. ft. sign area, 45 ft. in height with the option to add another 25 ft. in height at a later date and also the possibility of moving the sign into the public right-of-way. Mr. Gene York, 160 Brightwood Street, Chula Vista, owner of Parcel "B," 805 Properties stated that the individual request of the three owners is for a total 350 sq. ft. sign area. Mr. York expressed his concern over the timing and the delays caused by granting the sign area to Denny's Restaurant. Mr. Ferreira stated that if a sign is designed strictly for Denny's at this time, he would like to request a requirement that the signage footage be constructed in such a manner as to accommodate a maximum signage of 350 sq. ft. There being no further comments either for or against, the public hearing was declared closed. Council discussion ensued as to the question of how the properties would be developed; justification for allowing one sign at this time; allowing an encroachment into the public right-of-way in order to utilize that area and to reduce the sign area subsequently; at a later time when Parcel "C" is developed then a sign can be approved for that particular development at that time; and the three issues at present: where to locate the sign, the size of the sign, and the height of the sign. MS (Malcolm/Cox) to direct the staff to proceed with locating the sign in the public right-of-way issuing an encroachment permit, providing it meets all of the staff requirements. Discussion of the motion followed in which Councilman Scott indicated his concern that the three signs were interrelated and the motion should reject that. Councilman Malcolm withdrew his motion; Mayor Cox withdrew the second. MSC (Malcolm/Cox) to approve a total usage of 250 sq. ft. on the property with the proviso that lO0 sq. ft. be allowed Denny's right now with the location on the City's easement with a maximum height of 20 ft. (first phase); also that the footing be engineered to accommodate the other 150 sq. ft. area should the City Council at a later date feel it is appropriate to issue a permit for the additional signage. The Shell Oil Company is not part of this signage area. h f report as amended. The motion is to approve Alternate "C" of t e star Discussion of the motion followed with Councilman Scott remarking that he felt it was premature to approve the total signage area at this time; it was poor planning; this is an entrance into the City and should reflect a better signage visibility. Councilwoman McCandliss agreed stating that the property itself is visible from the freeway area; the sign will only draw more people to it; the reason for the requested large sign area is so that people driving on the freeway that miss this turn off would see the sign and drive back. City Council Meeting - 5 - October 26, 1982 City Engineer Lippitt asked that a separate resolution for the encroachment permit be brought back to the Council since there would be some conditions imposed on the approval. THE MOTION CARRIED BY THE FOLLOWING VOTE: AYES: Malcolm, Cox, Moore NOES: McCandliss, Scott ABSENT: None (A resolution will be brought back at the next meeting officiating this action.) MSUC (Scott/Moore) to bring back a separate resolution for the encroachment permit. 20. Report on POA (Police) and IAFF (Fire) Negotiations Impasse (Assistant City Manager) Negotiations between the Police Officers Association and the International Association of Firefighters progressed through impasse and mediation with a State Mediator without reaching agreement with either unit. Under the City's adopted Employer-Employee Relations Policy, representatives of each unit may now appear before the City Council as the last step in the process. Following each unit's presentation, it is expected that the City Council would meet in closed session to discuss whatever final action the City Council determines necessary. Hal King, Lieutenant, Police Department, spoke of his 30 year tenure on the Police force stating that if he retires now at the age of 55, his retirement benefit would be $1134 per month. Lieutenant King stated it would be impossible for him to live on this income at his current status and was told by the Retirement Officer that he would have to "lower his standard of living." Lieutenant King asked that the Council approve the 2% at 50 retirement benefits in order to give the policemen some public recognition for their efforts. Tom Basinski, Police Officer representing the Police Officers Association, related some of the testimon~v given by the PERS representatives at the October 19 meeting. Mr. Basinski said he submitted a number of questions to the Director of Personnel so that she could call other cities and get answers to them. He was not able to get any response to these questions. The questions were: - What is your contribution rate now; - What was the rate when 2% at 50 was purchased; - How many medical retirements versus regular retirements since 2% at 50; - How many of these retirements came about before the 2% at 50 was implemented? City Council Meeting - 6 - October 26, 1982 Mr. Basinski felt that the City Council is confused over the statistics regarding this plan and asked that discussion begin next week with the City Manager and the City Council in order to "strip away the fears" that the Council may have on the 2% at 50 plan. Mr. Basinski also stated that the Police Officers Association have declared that the only thing they want through negotiations is a 2% at 50. They will not strike; they will not have a sick-out; and they will not accept any contract unless it has 2% at 50. Mr. Basinski added that the officers are uncertain as to whether the issue is a philosophical one with the Council or an economical one. Mr. Richard Castle, spokesperson for the Police Officers Associaton Negotiation Team gave the background of the delays encountered in entering into negotiations because of the budget deficit. Embarassment was caused when the City Manager declared there was a surplus fund and not a deficit. At that time, the police officers felt they were duped. Mr. Castle stated that the Negotiation Team's mandate from the Association is "do not come back to us without an agreement for 2% at 50." Mr. Castle also suggested a joint meeting with the Police Officers Association and the Council to keep the negotiations open. Mr. Don Byrum representing the Chula Vista Firefighters referred to his written report noting the cost of the 2% at 50 plan. He stated that the Firefighters also are refusing to sign any contract that does not have the 2% at 50. Mayor Cox commented that the Council also feels the same frustration with the negotiation process but these guidelines must be followed. MSUC (Cox/Malcolm) to meet in Closed Session at the end of this meeting to discuss employee negotiations. A recess was called at 9:09 p.m. and the meeting reconvened at 9:19 p.m. CONSENT CALENDAR All matters listed under CONSENT CALENDAR are considered to be routine by the Council and will all be enacted by one motion in the form listed below. There will be no separate discussion of said items unless good cause is shown prior to the time the Council votes on the motion to adopt. MSUC (Cox/McCandliss) to approve the Consent Calendar. 7. Resolution 11047 Encouraging the owner of Janal Ranch to continue suitable agriculture on remaining lands (Director of Planning} The resolution expresses the City Council's desire that the owner of Janal Ranch continue suitable agricultural operations on the balance of ranch acreage not encompassed with EastLake I, and, further, it represents an invitation by Council for a representative of the Sierra Club to participate in the overall planning of the eastern portion of the Chula Vista Planning Area. City Council Meeting - 7 - October 26, 1982 8. Resolution 11048 Expressing intent to consider the Sweetwater Community Plan in the revision of the Chula Vista General Plan (Director of Planning) The Sweetwater Community Plan is an integral part of the San Diego County General Plan, and guides the growth, development, and conservation of a large part of the Chula Vista Planning Area. The proposed resolution of intent would therefor foster cooperation between the Sweetwater Community P1 anning Group, the residents of the unincorporated territory within the Sweetwater Valley, and the City of Chula Vista during this municipality's forthcoming General Plan revision studies. 9. Resolution 11049 Stipulating the interpretation of Proposition M on the November 2, 1982 ballot amending the Chula Vista City Charter, Sections 500 and 701 (City Attorney) The City Council at its meeting of October 19, 1982 agreed that the amendment to Sections 500 and 701 as set forth in Proposition M should not be interpreted as authorizing the possibility of placing management level positions other than that of assistant and deputy department heads for new and distinctive managerial positions in the unclassified service. They directed that an appropriate resolution be brought back declaring its intent. (End of Consent Calendar) RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES, FIRST READINGS lO. Resolution ll050 Supporting County Proposition A - Astrea helicopters (Director of Public Safety) Proposition A would authorize a special tax for fiscal year 1983-84 only. Proceeds of the special tax could only be used to purchase five new jet helicopters and modernize helicopter housing facilities for the Sheriff. The helicopters would be used for the Sheriffs' law enforcement, search and rescue, public disaster and fire services operations throughout the County. Council discussion involved questioning the vintage of the 1947 helicopters as stated in the report; the concerns of the Council with taxing the people for $3.25; whether this was a high priority item that justifies the tax; with 30,000 residential units in the City, Chula Vista would pay ~150,000. Director of Public Safety Winters commented that he would not consider this the highest priority for Chula Vista; however, Astrea does respond and help the Police Department in many ways as much as several times a week. RESOLUTION OFFERED BY COUNCILWOMAN MCCANDLISS, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved with Councilman Scott voting no. City Council Meeting - 8 - October 26, 1982 ll. Resolution ll051 Approving encroachment permit no. 82-18 for private 6" lateral to be installed on East "H" Street right-of- way (City Engineer) Steven Tatreau recently created 3 lots from his property along the O0 block of East "H" Street by means of Parcel Map No. 11703. In order to provide sewer to the new lots, he proposes to extend the public 8-inch main from the northerly end of Carla Avenue, terminating it on the north side of East "H" Street. A construction permit has been issued by this department for that work. RESOLUTION OFFERED BY COUNCILMAN SCOTT, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously. 12a Resolution Amending the Fiscal Year 1982-83 Budget by adding an additional park warden position (Director of Parks and Recreation) b. Resolution Appropriating funds to implement parking meter program at Rohr Park c. Ordinance Amending Chapter 10.56 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code by adding thereto a new Section 10.56.05B establishing parking zone at Rohr Park -First reading On September 21, 1982, the Council was asked to approve the concept of parking meters in Rohr Park as a means of supporting the cost of an additional full-time Park Warden. At the October 5th meeting, the Council by a 3-2 vote, agreed to accept the twenty-five cents an hour rate. One resolution authorizes an amendment to the budget to fund an additional Park Warden position and the other resolution authorizes appropriation of funds to purchase equipment and maintenance services necessary to implement the program for six months. The proposed ordinance authorizes a program of parking fees in Rohr Park. MSUC (Scott/Cox) to bring these items back at budget time for further consideration. CONTINUED MATTERS AND SECOND READING OF ORDINANCES 13. ORDINANCE 2009 Amending zoning map or maps established by Section 19.18.010 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code rezoning 0.88 ACRES at 446-450 Fourth Avenue from R-3 to C-O-P - Second reading and adoption (Director of Planning) The ordinance was placed on first reading at the meeting of October 19, 1982. It is now ready for second reading and adoption. MSUC (McCandliss/Moore) to place the ordinance on second reading and adoption, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously. City Council Meeting - 9 - October 26, 1982 14. Ordinance 2010 Establishing a prima facie speed limit of 25 & 30 miles per hour on Sequoia Street - Second reading and adoption (City Engineer) At the meeting of October 19, 1982, the Council placed the ordinance on first reading establishing: {1) A 30 mph speed limit on Sequoia Street from Brandywine Avenue to West Point Drive; {2) A 25 mph speed limit on Sequoia Street from Oleander Avenue to Brandywine Avenue. MSUC (McCandliss/Moore) to place the ordinance on second reading and adoption, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously. 15. REPORT OF THE CITY MANAGER a. City Manager Cole stated that on the proposed acquisition of the drainage easement which is to cross Uni ted Enterprises' property south of Otay Valley Road -- the staff scheduled the meeting for November 2, but because United Enterprises did not receive their notice in time the meeting will be scheduled for November 16. b. City Manager Cole stated that the Regional Energy Plan Program update scheduled for Thursday's conference, October 28 will be taken off that agenda and considered at a later time. c. Mr. Cole reported that Mr. Bill Robens will have a written report to go to the City Council i n their packets on Friday. He was not able to submit a recommendation on the SANDER project because final information on that will not be received until the 29th. Therefore, Mr. Robens will give the City Council an oral report and recommendation at their meeting of November 2. Also at this November 2 meeting will be Nicki Clay and Bob Zehr from the SANDER project, d. City Manager Cole referred to the itinerary submitted to the City Council for their tour scheduled for November 6 and asked that any suggestions or modifications to the itinerary be submitted to him. Mayor Cox stated that a tour of the San Diego Gas and Electric plant has been offered and he would ask that this be scheduled after the luncheon on the November 6 tour. REPORTS OF CITY OFFICERS AND DEPARTMENT HEADS 16. Report on SDG&E Franchise (City Attorney) At the Council meeting of October 5, 1982, the City Council upon receiving citizen complaints of air pollution resulting from the operation of the SDG&E power plant in the City of Chula Vista requested that the franchise be examined to determine what action might be appropriate on the part of the City to secure a cessation of the polluting activities of the power plant. City Council Meeting - lO - October 26, 1982 The City Attorney stated that the franchi se does not speak to the issue of power generation in the City of Chula Vista, but only to the question of the rights of the San Diego Gas & Electric Company to the use of the public rights of the City of Chula Vista for the transmission and distribution of gas and electrical power and the manner in which said rights of way are utilized. It was further requested that information be relayed as to the possibility of a renegotiation of the franchise with the thought that in some manner the issue of air pollution might therefore be resol red. The City Attorney has prepared this report. MSUC (Scott/McCandliss) to accept the report. 17. Report - Concerning Hourly and Monthly Cardroom Rates (Director of Public Safety) At the City Council meeting of September 28, 1982, staff was directed to bring back a report that would set forth the monthly rate that cities in San Diego County are charging for each cardroom table as well as the hourly rates that are being char ed to individuals who are playing in these cardrooms. The Director of Public has this report. Safety submitted Director of Public Safety Winters remarked that his agenda statement should be changed to state that the City of San Diego uses an escalating rate that starts at $40 per table i f the cardroom has one or two tables instead of five or more as reflected in his agenda statement. MSC (McCandliss/Cox) to accept the report. Councilman Malcolm voted no. Mr. W. W. Turner, 387 Fifth Avenue, Chula Vista, a retired groceryman, questioned why the charge per table for a cardroom when other businesses in the City are not charged in the same manner, i.e., restaurants are not charged per table, grocery stores are not charged per check-out stands. Acting City Attorney Hatton explained that the regulation governing cardroom licenses are different than any other business conducted in the City. If there are complaints, the complaint is directed toward a specific card table and not the business as a whole. MSUC (Scott/Moore) to bring the cardroom charges back at budget time. 18. Report - On landscaping the MTDB right of-way (Director of Public Works Operations) Director of Public Works Operations Crouse reported that Tom Larwin, General Manager for MTDB, said that MTDB had no plans to landscape the trolley corridor but they would grant a landscaping easement to the City of Chula Vista. The only criteria for using the easement would be that whatever is planted could not interfere with the trolley operations. In addition, MTDB will not maintain whatever is planted. City Council Meeting - ll October 26, 1982 The recommendation is that Council direct staff to include the project in the Capital Improvement Program for consideration in the FY 83-84 Budget. MSUC (Cox/Scott) to accept the report. Councilman Moore asked for a report to include the distance between the Mexican fan palms, the potential for soliciting the homeowners for paying for the trees as originally recommended years ago and have this brought back under the Capital Improvement Program. REPORTS OF BOARDS, COMMISSIONS AND ORGANIZATIONS 19. Annual Report of Design Review Committee (Director of Planning) The Director of Planning submitted the annual report of the Design Review Committee expressing his comments on the excellent contribution this group of people have made to the City of Chula Vista. MSUC (Cox/Scott) to accept the report. 20. Report on POA (Police) and IAFF (Fire) Negotiations Impasse (Assistant City Manager) See page 5. 21. MAYOR'S REPORT a. Mayor Cox discussed Proposition "C" that will be on the ballot on November 2 which would allow the County to require a 2~ per gallon gas tax. This money would be used strictly for road improvements and would result in Chula Vista getting approximately $600,000 a year. MSUC (Cox/Scott) to take a position of support for Proposition "C." b. Mayor Cox reminded the audience and the Council of the Air Pollution Control District meeting this Friday, October 29 at the Lauderbach Community Center, 333 Oxford Street from 7:00 to 9:00 p.m. 22. COUNCIL COMMENTS a. Councilman Moore noted that 17 cities won an Award of Excellence at the League of California Cities Conference last week. MSUC (Moore/Scott) for the City Manager to write a letter to these cities and request a copy of their programs. b. Councilman Malcolm requested that the agenda for November 2 be short due to the election and that any items that can possibly be postponed, that the staff do so. City Council Meeting - 12 - October 26, 1982 c. MSUC (Scott/Moore) to send a nice friendly letter to the MTDB regarding the landscaping at the "H" Street Trolley Station asking their help in maintaining the landscaping to keep it up to the high standards of the City of Chula Vista. d. Councilwoman McCandliss stated that the Board of Supervisors met today to discuss the trash-to-energy plants and by a 3-2 vote they approved an agreement which included three site locations, two of which would be San Marcos and Otay Valley. Supervisors Fordham and Hamilton opposed the motion. Herzog Company would not negotiate away its option of the Otay site. The Council recessed to Closed Door at 9:52 p.m. The City Clerk was excused and the City Manager reported that the meeting reconvened at ll:lO. ADJOURNMENT AT ll:lO p.m. to the Council Conference on October 28 at 4 p.m., to Saturday, October 30 at 8:00 a.m, and to the regular meeting on November 2, 1982 at 7 p.m. e M. Fulasz, WPC 0199C