The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About2007/01/23 Agenda Packet I declare under penalty of perjury that I am employed by the City of Chula Vista in the Office of the City Clerk and that I posted this document on the bulletin board accordIQd\t..~ ~ ~ Srown Act requirements. ::::2" ~ '"} /IL =-~-- Signea:ll lW/ '-IUvJfdS55:::E ellY OF CHULA VISTA rY Cheryl Cox. Mayor Rudy Ramirez, Coul1cilmember Jim Thomson, Interim City Manager John McCann. Council member Ann Moore. City Attorney Jerry R. Rindone, Council member Susan Bigelow, City Clerk Steve Castaneda, Councilmember January 23,2007 6:00 P.M. Council Chambers City Hall 276 Fourth Avenue CALL TO ORDER ROLL CALL: Councilmembers Castaneda, McCann, Ramirez, Rindone, and Mayor Cox PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG AND MOMENT OF SILENCE SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY . OATH OF OFFICE Tim Jones - Growth Management Oversight Commission . INTRODUCTION BY POLICE CHIEF EMERSON OF SEVEN POLICE RECRUITS AND ONE LATERAL OFFICER . PRESENTATION BY DEPUTY MAYOR RINDONE OF A PROCLAMATION ON BEHALF OF DIANE CARPENTER, COMMUNITY AND EDUCATIONAL LEADER, COMMENDING HER FOR HER VISION, HER SERVICE, AND HER COMPASSIONATE HEART . DID YOU KNOW.....THAT THE NATURE CENTER HAS ENDANGERED GREEN SEA TURTLES? Presented by Joyce Remp, RVT, Curator of Reptiles CONSENT CALENDAR (Items I through 8) The Council will enact the Consent Calendar staff recommendations by one motion, without discussion, unless a Councilmember, a member of the public, or City staff requests that an item be removed for discussion. If you wish to speak on one of these items, please fill out a "Request to Speak" form (available in the lobby) and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be discussed immediately following the Consent Calendar. 1. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2007 LIBRARY GRANT FUND BUDGET BY APPROPRIATING A ONE-TIME UNANTICIPATED CALIFORNIA STATE LIBRARY GRANT AUGMENTATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,671 FOR EXPENDITURES ASSOCIATED WITH THE CHULA VISTA LITERACY TEAM'S CALIFORNIA LIBRARY LITERACY SERVICES MATCHING FUNDS GRANT (4/5THS VOTE REQUIRED) Adoption of the resolution will approve the appropriation of a one-time augmentation in the amount of$3,671 in Literacy Services Matching Grant funds to the Fiscal Year 2007 Library Department budget. (Assistant City Manager Palmer/Library Director) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. 2. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2007 LIBRARY DEPARTMENT BUDGET BY APPROPRIATING UNANTICIPATED DONATION REVENUE IN THE AMOUNT OF $55,000 (4/5THS VOTE REQUIRED) Adoption of the resolution will approve the appropnatJon of $55,000 in donations received from various organizations and individuals for the purchase of new books to the Fiscal Year 2007 Library DepartInent budget. (Assistant City Manager Palmer/Library Director) Staffrecommendation: Council adopt the resolution. 3. A. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A SPECIAL ELECTION IN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT 13M (OT A Y RANCH VILLAGE TWO) B. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 13M (OTAY RANCH VILLAGE TWO (FIRST READING) Council previously initiated proceedings for the formation of Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 13M, and on January 16,2007, a Special Tax Election was conducted. Adoption of the resolution declares the results of that election; and adoption of the ordinance will authorize the levy of a special tax in CFD 13M. This district will fund the perpetual operation and maintenance of landscaping including parkways, medians and slopes; facilities that are directly related to storm water quality control; walls and fencing; trails; pedestrian bridges, including graffiti removal; and public lighting facilities. The City has retained the services of MuniFinancial as special tax consultant and Best Best & Krieger LLP as legal counsel to provide assistance during the proceedings. (City Engineer) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution and place the ordinance on first reading. Page 2 - Council Agenda http://www.chulavistaca.gov January 23, 2007 4. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACTING AS THE LEGISLATNE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 97-2 (PRESERVE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT), DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A SPECIAL ELECTION IN THAT AREA DESIGNATED AS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 97-2 (PRESERVE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT), IMPROVEMENT AREA C, ANNEXATION NO.6 (OTA Y RANCH VILLAGE TWO), AND ADDING SUCH TERRITORY TO SUCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT AND IMPROVEMENT AREA Council previously initiated annexation proceedings for Community Facilities District (CFD) No. 97-2 (Preserve Maintenance District), approved certain findings, authorized the electors to vote on the annexation of Otay Ranch Village Two to CFD 97-2, Improvement Area C, and held the election on January 16, 2007. Adoption of this resolution declares the results of that election, and adds the territory to the district. The special taxes levied within Improvement Area C will fund the costs of the Resource Monitoring Program as well as Preserve Operations and Maintenance consistent with the requirements of the Otay Ranch Resource Management Plan Phases I and II, plus a pro- rata share of Administrative Expenses of CFD No. 97-2. The City has retained the services of MuniFinancial as special tax consultant and Best Best & Krieger LLP, as legal counsel to provide assistance during the proceedings. (City Engineer) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. 5. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE SUBMmAL OF THREE GRANT APPLICATIONS TO THE SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (SANDAG) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2007/2008 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT (IDA) AND TRANSNET FUNDING, FOR BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN IMPROVEMENTS The Transportation Development Act and TransNet Program provide funding support for regional bicycle and pedestrian capital improvement projects. The San Diego Association of Governments will allocate those project funds to cities in the San Diego region based upon funding availability and project ranking. Adoption of the resolution approves the submittal of three applications for funding. (City Engineer) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. 6. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADDING ONE LATENT PRINT EXAMINER TO THE AUTHORIZED STAFFING LEVEL OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2006/2007 POLICE BUDGET AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS BASED UPON UNANTICIPATED REVENUES (4/5THS VOTE REQUIRED) The Police Department, in partnership with the San Diego County Sheriffs Department, proposes to add one Latent Print Examiner. This new position would provide latent print services on a regional basis and would be completely funded by the San Diego County's California Identification System Remote Access Network program. (Police Chief) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. Page 3 - Council Agenda htto://www.chulavistaca.gov January 23, 2007 7. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING FEDERAL FUNDING REQUESTS FOR SUBMISSION Adoption of the resolution will approve those items to be submitted to Chula Vista's Congressional delegation to request federal funds. (Assistant City Manager Smith) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. 8. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING A TENANT-BASED RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM AND AUTHORIZING THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE ALL DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR PROCESSING The City Council approved the use of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (BUD) HOME funds for a rental assistance program to help with monthly rental payments for low-income households, offering "displaced persons" a priority. Staff has developed the program guidelines and all associated forms. Adoption of the resolution authorizes staff to both operate the program and execute all documents necessary for processing. (Acting Director of Community Development) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the resolution. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR PUBLIC COMMENTS Persons speaking during Public Comments may address the Council/Authority on any subject matter within the Council/Authority's jurisdiction that is not listed as an item on the agenda. State law generally prohibits the Council//Authority from taking action on any issue not included on the agenda, but, if appropriate, the Council/Agency/Authority may schedule the topic for future discussion or refer the matter to staff. Comments are limited to three minutes. PUBLIC HEARINGS The following items have been advertised as public hearings as required by law. If you wish to speak on any item, please fill out a "Request to Speak" form (available in the lobby) and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. 9. CONSIDERATION OF A TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION, PCS-06-12, TO CONVERT AN EXISTING 12-UNIT APARTMENT COMPLEX TO 12 CONDOMINIUM UNITS FOR INDIVIDUAL OWNERSHIP AT 582 ARIZONA STREET Adoption of the resolution approves a proposed condominium conversion of an existing 12-unit apartment complex at 582 Arizona Street to 12 condominiums for individual ownership. (Planning and Building Director) Page 4 - Council Agenda htto:/! www.chulavistaca.gov January 23, 2007 Staff recommendation: Council conduct the public hearing and adopt the following resolution: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING AND ESTABLISHING CONDITIONS OF A TENTATIVE MAP TO DIVIDE INTEREST IN .45 ACRES AT 582 ARIZONA STREET FOR A ONE-LOT CONDOMINIUM CONTAINING 12 RESIDENTIAL UNITS 10. CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER X (BUILDING) AND CHAPTER XIV (PLANNING) OF THE CITY'S MASTER FEE SCHEDULE April 2001 was the last time the Building Fee schedule was updated, and November 2004 was the last time the Planning Fee Schedule was updated. Subsequent revisions to the full-cost recovery rates and departmental reorganizations necessitate fee schedule updates to ensure full cost recovery for services is provided. (Planning and Building Director) Staff recommendation: Council conduct the public hearing and adopt the following resolutions: A. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHAPTER X (BUILDING) OF THE CITY'S MASTER FEE SCHEDULE B. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING CHAPTER XI V (PLANNING) OF THE CITY'S MASTER FEE SCHEDULE II. CONSIDERATION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE LIBRARY'S MASTER FEE SCHEDULE As a result of the Library's growing emphasis on Local History and increasing demand by the public for historic photographs and documents, the Library recommends a change to its Master Fee Schedule. (Assistant City Manager Palmer/Library Director) Staff recommendation: Council conduct the public hearing and adopt the following resolution: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING CHANGES TO THE LIBRARY MASTER FEE SCHEDULE ACTION ITEMS The Item listed in this section of the agenda will be considered individually by the Council/Authority, and is expected to elicit discussion and deliberation. If you wish to speak on any item, please fill out a "Request to Speak" form (available in the lobby) and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Page 5 - Council Agenda httv ://\vww.c hulavistaca. gOY January 23, 2007 6:45 p.m. Time Certain 12. CONSIDERATION OF WAIVING THE FORMAL BIDDING PROCESS, APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT WITH COOPER ROBERTSON & PARTNERS FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES RELATED TO EVALUATION OF POTENTIAL STADIUM SITES FOR THE SAN DIEGO CHARGERS WITHIN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, ADOPTION OF GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR CHARGER RELOCATION, AND THE REFORMATION OF THE CHARGERS SUBCOMMITTEE Adoption of the resolution approves a consulting contract that provides the City of Chula Vista with the necessary consultant resources to evaluate various sites within the City of Chula Vista for a stadium complex for the San Diego Chargers. The Three-Party Agreement ensures that the necessary work as directed by the City will be paid for by the San Diego Chargers. The City Council is requested to adopt the principles that the City of Chula Vista will operate under in its work on the stadium proposal. The guiding principles emphasize public participation in the design process, fiscal responsibility, and environmental sensitivity among other principles. The City Council is also requested to reform the subcommittee to remove the Planning Director and City Attorney, leaving two council members. (Planning and Building Director) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the following resolution, adopt the guiding principals, and approve the reformation of the Council Subcommittee: A. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA WAIVING THE FORMAL BIDDING PROCESS, APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COOPER ROBERTSON & PARTNERS (CONSULTANT) AND THE SAN DIEGO CHARGERS (APPLICANT) FOR THE EVALUATION OF POTENTIAL STADIUM SITES WITHIN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO SIGN THE AGREEMENT B. ADOPTION OF GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR CHARGER RELOCATION C. APPROVAL OF RECOMMENDED REFORMATION OF COUNCIL SUBCOMMITTEE ON CHARGERS RELOCATION 13. CONSIDERATION OF APPROVAL OF A LEASE AGREEMENT WITH HTH (HIGH TECH HIGH) LEARNING TO LEASE 8-ACRES OF CITY-OWNED LAND TO DEVELOP A CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER HTH Learning is a private nonprofit organization overseeing the development and operation of facilities that house High Tech High Schools following the charter high school design model. They currently operate a total of seven high, middle and elementary schools, with six in San Diego and one in northern California. (Acting Community Development Director) Staff recommendation: Council adopt the following resolution: Page 6 - Council Agenda htto://"".i\VW .chula vistaca. gOV January 23, 2007 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVING A LEASE AGREEMENT WITH HTH LEARNING TO LEASE 8 ACRES OF CITY-OWNED LAND TO DEVELOP A CHARTER HIGH: SCHOOL AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER, WITH AN OPTION TO DEVELOP A CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL ON 2.7 ACRES, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT OTHER BUSINESS 14. CITY MANAGER'S REPORTS 15. MAYOR'S REPORTS · Discussion regarding Sout~ay Power Plant Subcommittee 16. COUNCIL COMMENTS CLOSED SESSION Announcements of actions taken In Closed Session shall be made available by noon on Wednesday following the Council Meeting at the City Attorney's office in accordance with the Ralph M. Brown Act (Government Code 54957.7). 17. PUBLIC EMPLOYEE APPOINTMENT PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957(b)(1) Title: City Manager 18. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATORS PURSUANT TO GOVERNMENT CODE SECTION 54957.6(a) Unrepresented employee: City Manager ADJOURNMENT to an Adjourned R~gular Meeting, January 25, 2007 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers In compliance with the AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT The City of Chula Vista requests indivic\uals who require special accommodations to access, attend, and/or participate in a City meetiI1g, activity, or service request such accommodation at least forty-eight hours in advance for Jineetings and five days for scheduled services and activities. Please contact the City Clerk for specific information at (619) 691-5041 or Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf(TDD) at (619) 585-5655. California Relay Service is also available for the hearing impaired. Page 7 - Council Agenda httn:llwww.chulavistaca.gov January 23, 2007 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ~V;!f::.. CITY OF - - (HULA VISTA January 23, 2007 Item-L SUBMITTED BY: RESOLUTION AMENDING THE FY07 LIBRARY GRANT FUND BUDGET BY APPROPRIATING A ONE- . TIME UNANTICIPATED CALIFORNIA STATE LIBRARY GRANT AUGMENTATION IN THE AMOUNT OF $3,671 FOR EXPENDITURES ASSOCIATED WITH THE CHULA VISTA LITERACY TEAM'S CALIFORNIA LIBRARY LITERACY SERVICES MATCHING FUNDS GRANT. DAVID PALMER, A~T CITY MAN. AGER/ LIBRARY DIRECTOR I-rf au ~ JIM THOMSON, INTERIM CITY MANAGER d i ITEM TITLE: REVIEWED BY: 4/5THS VOTE: YES X NO BACKGROUND The California State Library has advised the Chula Vista Public Library that its California Library Literacy Services Matching Funds Grant has been augmented by $3,671 for FY07. These funds must therefore be appropriated. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment; therefore, pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State 'CEQA Guidelines the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is necessary. RECOMMENDATION That Council adopt the resolution amending the FY07 Library Grant Fund supplies and services budget by appropriating unanticipated California Library Literacy Services grant augmentation funds in the amount of $3,671 for expenditures for the Chula Vista Literacy Team's Matching Funds grant. 1-1 Date, Item~ Page 2 of2 BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDA nON N/A DISCUSSION The California State Library has advised the Chula Vista Public Library that its California Library Literacy Services Matching Funds Grant has been augmented by $3,671 for fiscal year 2007 to cover expenditures for part-tinie Literacy Instructors. DECISION MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site specific and consequently the 500 foot rule found in California Code of Regulations section 1 8704.2(a)(1) is not applicable to this decision. FISCAL IMPACT There is no impact to the General Fund. An additional one-time augmentation in the amount of $3,671 will be appropriated into the Library Grant Fund supplies and services budget. These funds will be used to pay for hourly wages for Literacy Team Instructors. Prepared by: Mariya Anton, Senior Management Analyst. Library 1-2 RESOLUTION NO. 2007- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2007 LIBRARY DEPARTMENT BUDGET BY APPROPRIATING A ONE-TIME UNANTICIPATED CALIFOR..c~IA STATE LIBRARY GRANT AUGMENTATION IN THE; AMOUNT OF $3,671 FOR EXPENDITURES ASSOCIATED WITH THE CHULA VISTA LITERA.CY TEAM'S CALIFORNIA LIBRARY LITERACY SERVICES MATCHING FUNDS GRANT WHEREAS, the California State Library has advised the Chula Vista Public Library that its California Library Literacy Services Matching Funds Grant has been augmented by $3,671 for Fiscal Year 2007 to cover expenditures for part-time Literacy Instructors; and WHEREAS, an additional, onetime augmentation in the amount of $3,6712 will be appropriated into the Library Department supplies and services budget; and WHEREAS, these funds will be used to pay for hourly wages for Literacy Team Instructors. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby amend the Fiscal Year 2007 Library Department supplies and services budget by appropriating a one-time unanticipated California State Library Literacy Services Grant augmentation in the amount of $3,671 for expenditures associated with the Chula Vista Literacy Team's California Library Literacy Services Matching Funds Grant. Presented by Approved as to form by David Palmer Assistant City Manager / Director of Library ~~>,~\A~\\ Ann Moore City Attorney J:\Attomey\RESO\FINANCE\Amend FY 07 budget - Library (Calif State Library Grant)_OI423407,doc 1-3 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT January 23, 2007 Item .:2- SUBMITTED BY: RESOLUTION AMENDING THE FY07 LIBRARY DEPARTMENT BUDGET BY APPROPRIATING UNANTICIPATED DONATION REVENUE IN THE AMOUNT OF $55,000.00 DAVID PALMER, A~ CITY MAN,AGERI LIBRARY DIRECTOR I, JIM THOMSON, INTERIM ITY MANAGER . J j ITEM TITLE: REVIEWED BY: 4/5THS VOTE: YES X NO BACKGROUND Since July I, 2006, the Library Department has received donations from various organizations and individuals for the purchase of new books to add to the Library's collection. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment; therefore, pursuant to Section 15061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines the activity is not subject to CEQA Thus, no environmental review is necessary. RECOMMENDATION That Council adopt the resolution amending the FY07 Library Department supplies and services budget by appropriating unanticipated donation revenue in the amount of $55,000.00. BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A 2-1 January 23, 2007, Item~ Page 2 of2 DISCUSSION As part of its ongoing fund raising efforts, the Library conducts various direct mail solicitation campaigns to supplement its book or materials budget. This year, the Library is requesting that $31,000 worth of donations be appropriated for books. Additionally, the Library has received its annual dispersal :ti;om the Friends of the Chula Vista Library Endowment Fund at the San Diego Foundation, totaling $24,000.00. The endowment fund was established in 1997 specifically to supplement the Library's book or materials budget. Over the years, the endowment has grown to over $500,000, the principle of which cannot be touched. Since the endowment has now reached a major fmancial threshold, the Library will henceforth be annually appropriating the dispersal to supplement the book budget, as approved by City Council in 1997 (ATTACHMENT A). The amount of funds eligible for dispersal is based upon a specific formula established by the San Diego Foundation. DECISION MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site specific and consequently the 500 foot rule found in California Code of Regulations section 1 8704.2(a)(l) is not applicable to this decision. FISCAL IMPACT There is no net fiscal impact to the General Fund. These one-time funds will be used to purchase approximately 2,200 new books and DVD's that otherwise the Library could not afford to purchase. Prepared by: Mariya Anton, Senior Management Analyst, Library 2-2 ATrACEMENT tlA" RESOLUTION NO. 18772 \ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA SUPPORTING THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A FRIENDS OF THE CHULA VISTA LIBRARY DESIGNATED ENDOWMENT FUND AT THE SAN DIEGO COMMUNITY FOl:JNDATION WHEREAS, on August 14, 1997, the Umbrella Board of the Friends of the Chula Vista Library approved the establishment of a Designated Endowment Fund with the San Diego Community Foundation; and WHEREAS, the Board also agreed to donate $15,000 to establish the fund to be called: "The Friends of the Chula Vista Endowment Fund"; and WHEREAS, in establishing the fund, the Friends will designate the Chula Vista Public Library as the beneficiary and the dividends from this fund will be restricted for the acquisition of materials (books, videos, periodicals, software, online information services, etc.l; and WHEREAS, these funds must be used to supplement rather than supplant the City's General Fund support for materials. Finally, in establishing the fund, the Umbrella Board has specified that the San Diego Community FO,undation may not make any disbursements to the' Library prior to the year 2006 or until the fund accumuletes $250,000; and WHEREAS, it is recommended to support the creation of identjfied projects on which to spend these funds and'include this documentation in the Library's annual written goals and objectives; and _ ' WHEREAS" on August, 27, 1997 the Library Board of Trustees voted to support the Friends' creation of a Designated Endowment Fund with the San Diego Community Foundation., NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby support the establishment of a Friends- of the Chula Vista Library Designated Endowment Fund at the San Diego Community Foundation. Presented by Approved as to form by ~~ Library Director Aii" n M. Kaheny' / , City Attorney 2-3 :esolution 18772 'age 2 PASSED, APPROVED, and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, :alifornia, this 9th day of September, 1997, by the following vote: AYES: Council members: Moot, Padilla, Rindone, Salas, and Horton NAYES: Councilmembers: None ABSENT: Councilmembers: None ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: None Shirley Horton, Mayor , TTEST: leverly ,Authelet, City Clerk iTATE OF CALIFORNIA :OUNTY OF SAN DIEGO :ITY OF CHULA VISTA , Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista. California, do hereby certify that he foregoing Resolution No. 18772 was duly passed, approved, and adopted by the City :ouncil at a regular meeting of the Chula Vista City Council held on the 9th day of September, i997. :xecuted this 9th day of September, 1997 ~(} !2;fdiU Beverly . Authelet, City Clerk 2-4 RESOLUTION NO. 2007- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AMENDING THE FISCAL YEAR 2007 LIBRARY DEPARTMENT BUDGET BY APPROPRIATING UNANTICIPATED DONATION REVENUE IN THE AMOUNT OF $55,000,00 WHEREAS, as part of its ongoing fundraising efforts, the Library conducts various direct mail solicitation campaigns to supplement its book or materials budget. This year, the Library is requesting that $30,600 worth of donations be appropriated for books; and WHEREAS, since July 1,2006, the Library Department has received donations from various organizations and individuals for the purchase of new books to add to the Library's collection; and WHEREAS, the Library received its annual dispersal from the Friends of the Chula Vista Library Endowment Fund at the San Diego Foundation, totaling $24,000,00. The endowment fund was established in 1997 specifically to supplement the Library's book or materials budget. Over the years, the endowment has grown to over $500,000, the principle of which cannot be touched, Since the endowment has now reached a major financial threshold, the Library will henceforth be annually appropriating the dispersal to supplement the book budget, as approved by City Council in 1997. The amount of funds eligible for dispersal is based upon a specific formula established by the San Diego Foundation; and, WHEREAS, the onetime funds will be used to purchase approximately 2,200 new books and DVDs that otherwise the library could not afford to purchase. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby amend the Fiscal Year 2007 Library Department supplies and services budget by appropriating the unanticipated donation revenue in the amount of$55,000,00. Presented by Approved as to form by ~~,,\<:1('5;;\\~~\:>.~ Ann Moore City Attorney David Palmer Assistant City Manager / Director of Library J:\Altorney\RESO\FINANCE\Amend FY 07 budget - Library (unallticipated donation)_O 1-2J-07.doc 2-5 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ~~ CITY OF . .;:;~ CHULA VISTA 01/23/07 Item...;' ITEM TITLE: DECLARE ELECTION RESULTS REGARDING LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 13M (OTAY RANCH VILLAGE TWO) AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT THEREIN AND AUTHORIZE THE LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A SPECIAL ELECTION IN SUCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 13M (OTAY RANCH VILLAGE TWO) ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 13M (OTAY RANCH VILLAGE TWO) SUBMITTED BY: REVIEWED BY: CITY ENGINEER.P / INTERIM CITY MANAGER;j1 4/5THS VOTE: YES NO X BACKGROUND On November 21, 2006, the City Council initiated proceedings for the formation of CFD No. 13M by adoption of Resolutions 2006-349 through 2006-351. On January 9,2007, the City Council approved the formation and establishment ofCFD No. 13M by adoption of Resolution 2007-008. On January 16, 2007, a Special Tax Election for CFD No. 13M was conducted. Tonight's action is the next step in the proceedings to establish CFD No. 13M. This district will fund the perpetual operation and maintenance of (a) landscaping including, but not limited to, parkways, medians and slopes; (b) facilities that are directly related to storm water quality control; (c) walls and fencing; (d) trails; (e) pedestrian bridges, including, but not limited to, graffiti removal; and (I) public lighting facilities. 3-1 01/23/07, lteml Page 2 00 The City has retained the services of MuniFinancial as special tax consultant and Best, Best and Krieger, LLP as legal counsel to provide assistance during the proceedings. RECOMMENDATION That Council: 1. Approve the resolution declaring the results of a special election in such Community Facilities District No. 13M (Otay Ranch Village Two), and 2. Approve the ordinance authorizing the levy of special tax within Community Facilities District No. 13M (Otay Ranch Village Two). BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Not applicable DISCUSSION On January 13, 1998, Council adopted the "City of Chula Vista Statement of Goals and Policies regarding the establishment of Community Facilities Districts" (the "Goals and Policies"). The approval of this document ratified the use of CFDs as a public financing mechanism for (l) the construction and/or acquisition of public infrastructure, and (2) the financing of authorized public services. Taxes levied by maintenance districts, such as CFD No. 13M, are currently excluded from the 2% maximum tax criterion set forth in the Goals and Policies. On April 28, 1998, Council, acting under its Charter authority, enacted the "Chula Vista Community Facilities District Ordinance" (the "Ordinance"). The Ordinance adopted the Mello-Roos Act with modifications to accomplish the following: 1) incorporate all maintenance activities authorized by the "Landscaping & Lighting Act of 1972" ("1972 Act"), 2) include certain maintenance activities not listed in the "Mello-Roos Act" or the "1972 Act", and 3) establish an operating reserve fund for open space districts. CFD 13M will provide the necessary funding for the operation and maintenance of public landscaping and storm water quality, walls, fencing, trails, pedestrian bridges, and lighting improvements serving Otay Ranch Village Two by levying an annual "special tax", which is collected from the property owners within CFD 13M in conjunction with the property taxes. There is no direct cost to the City. All expenses related to the district administration, including levying and collecting the special taxes, are also funded from such special taxes. The proposed CFD No. 13M is consistent with the above-mentioned Ordinance and the Goals and Policies. In addition, the staff and developer have met to discuss, review and clarify the intent of the Goals and Policies and Ordinance, the proposed special tax rates and the methodology for the apportionment of the special taxes. Any matters raised by the developers have been discussed and solutions, satisfactory to all parties, were incorporated in the "Rate and Method of Apportionment" (the "RMA") approved at the November 21, 2006, Council meeting. 3-2 OI!23!07,Item~ Page3of3 During its November 21,2006 meeting, the City Council approved Resolution No. 2006- 351, which ordered the preparation ofa Community Facilities District Report ("Report"). The Report was approved on January 9, 2007. During its January 9, 2007 meeting, City Council approved Resolution No. 2007-008 which ordered the formation and establishment of Community Facilities District No. 13M and authorized the electors to vote on the special taxes. During its January 9, 2007, meeting, City Council authorized the City Clerk to conduct the special election and the special election was conducted on January 16,2007. Resol uti on/Ordinance The City Clerk, acting as the designated election official, has held a special election within Community Facilities District No. 13M (Otay Ranch Village Two), on January 16, 2007 at which time the qualified electors, being the owners of land within such Community Facilities District No. 13M were entitled to vote on ballot propositions to authorize the levy of the special taxes described above. The results of the election showed that the levy of special tax was approved by the electors. There are one resolution and one ordinance on today's agenda, which, if adopted, will accomplish the following: 1. Declare the results of the special election, which was held on January 16, 2007, for Community Facilities District No. 13M. 2. The Ordinance authorizing the levy of a special tax is the formal action of the City Council authorizing the levy of a special tax within Community Facilities District No. 13M (First reading). DECISION MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council and has found no property holdings within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property, which is the subject of this action. FISCAL IMP ACT All costs offormation of the district are being borne by the developers and the on-going administration will be funded entirely by the district. The City will recover the full cost of staff time expended in district formation and administration activities in perpetuity. EXHIBITS A. Certificate of Election Official and Statement of Votes Cast Prepared by: Boushra Salem, Senior Civil Engineer, Engineering Department 3-3 EXHIBIT "A" CERTIFICATE OF ELECTION OFFICIAL AND STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST STATE OF CALIFOR.'JIA ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ss. CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) The undersigned, ELECTION OFFICIAL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that pursuant to the provisions of Section 53326 of the Government Code and Division 12, commencing with Section 17000 of the Elections Code of the State of California, I did canvass the returns of the votes cast at the CITY OF CHULA VISTA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 13M (OTA Y RANCH VILLAGE TWO) SPECIAL ELECTION in said City, held January 16,2007. I FURTHER CERTIFY that this Statement of Votes Cast shows the whole number of votes cast in said District in said City, and the whole number of votes cast for the Measures in said District in said City, and the totals as shown for the Measures are full, true and correct. 1. VOTES CAST ON PROPOSITION A: YES NO 738 o 2. VOTES CAST ON PROPOSITION B: YES 738 NO 0 WITNESS my hand and Official Seal this day of ,2007. CITY CLERK ELECTION OFFICIAL CITY OF CHULA VISTA STATE OF CALIFORNIA SDPUBIKSAL 1'\342302.1 3-4 " ~ RESOUITION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A SPECIAL ELECTION IN SUCH COMM1JNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 13M (OTAY RANCH VILLAGE TWO) WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFOR.NIA (the "City Council"), has previously undertaken proceedings to create and did establish a Community Facilities District pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities. Act of 1982," being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (the "Act") and the City of Chula Vista Community Facilities District Ordinance enacted pursuant to the powers reserved by the City of Chula Vista under Sections 3, 5 and 7 of Article XI of the Constitution of the State of California (the "Ordinance") (the Act and the Ordinance may be referred to collectively as the "Community Facilities District Law"). This Community Facilities District is referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRlCT NO. 13M (OTA Y RANCH VILLAGE TWO) (the "District"); and, WHEREAS, this City Council did call for and order to be held an election to submit to the qualified electors of the District a proposition relating to the levy of special taxes within the District and a separate proposition relating to the establishment of an appropriations limit for the District; and, WHEREAS, at this time said election has been held and the measures voted upon and each such measure did receive the favorable 2/3 's vote of the qualified electors, and this City Council desires to declare the results of the election in accordance with the provisions of the Elections Code of the State of California. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 13M (OTAY RANCH VILLAGE TWO), DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, FIND, DETERMfr.!'E A.J.'-iTI ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. This City Council hereby receives and approves the CERTIFICATE OF ELECTION OFFICIAL MTI STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST, as submitted by the City Clerk, acting in her capacity as the Election Official, said Statement identifying the measures voted upon and the number of votes given for and/or against the measures voted upon. A copy of said Certificate and Statement is attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A," referenced and so incorporated. SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed, pursuant to the provlSlons of the Elections Code of the State of California, to enter in the minutes the results of the election as set forth in said STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST. 1 3-5 PREPARED BY: Scott Tulloch City Engineer 3-6 APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Ci 2 EXHIBIT "A" CERTIFICATE OF ELECTION OFFICIAL AND STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ss. CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) The undersigned, ELECTION OFFICIAL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that pursuant to the provisions of Section 53326 of the Government Code and Division 12, commencing with Section 17000 of the Elections Code of the State of California, I did canvass the returns of the votes cast at the CITY OF CHULA VISTA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 13M (OTAY RANCH VILLAGE TWO) SPECIAL ELECTION in said City, held January 16, 2007. I FURTHER CERTIFY that this Statement of Votes Cast shows the whole number of votes cast in said District in said City, and the whole number of votes cast for the Measures in said District in said City, and the totals as shown for the Measures are full, true and correct. 1. VOTES CAST ON PROPOSITION A: YES NO 738 o 2. VOTES CAST ON PROPOSITION B YES 738 NO 0 WITNESS my hand and Official Seal this day of ,2007. CITY CLERK ELECTION OFFICIAL CITY OF CHULA VISTA STATE OF CALIFORNIA SDPUBIKSAL TIJ42J02.1 3-73 ORDINANCE NO. ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING THE LEVY OF A SPECIAL TAX WITHIN COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 13M (OTA Y RANCH VILLAGE TWO) WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA (the "City Council"), has initiated proceedings, held a public hearing, conducted an election and received a favorable vote from the qualified electors authorizing the levy of a special taxes within a community facilities district, all as authorized pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-RoGS Community Facilities Act of 1982", being Chapter 2.5, Part I. Division 2, Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California (the "Act") and the City of Chula Vista Community Facilities District Ordinance enacted pursuant to the powers reserved by the City of Chula Vista under Sections 3, 5 and 7 of Article XI of the Constitution of the State of California (the "Ordinance") (the Act and the Ordinance may be referred to collectively as the "Community Facilities District Law"). This Community Facilities District is designated as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 13M (OTAY RANCH VILLAGE TWO) (the "District"). The City Council of the City of Chula Vista, California, acting as the legislative body of Community Facilities District No. 13M (Otay Ranch Village Two), does hereby ordain as follows: SECTION 1, This City Council does, by the passage of this ordinance, authorize the levy of special taxes within the District pursuant to the Rate and Method of Apportionment of Special Taxes as set forth in Exhibit "A" attached hereto (the "Rate and Method"), referenced and so incorporated. SECTION 2. This City Council, acting as the legislative body of the District, is hereby further authorized, by Resolution, to annually determine the special taxes to be levied within the District for the then current tax year or future tax years, except that the special tax to be levied within the District shall not exceed the maximum special tax calculated pursuant to the Rate and Method, but the special tax may be levied at a lower rate. SECTION 3. The special taxes herein authorized, to the extent possible, shall be collected in the same manner as ad valorem property taxes and shall be subject to the same penalties, procedure, sale and lien priority in any case of delinquency as applicable for ad valorem taxes; provided, however, the District may utilize a direct billing procedure for any special taxes that cannot be collected on the County tax roll or may, by resolution, elect to collect the special taxes at a different time or in a different manner if necessary to meet its financial obligations. SECTION 4. The special taxes shall be secured by the lien imposed pursuant to Sections 3114.5 and 3115.5 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, which lien shall be a continuing lien and shall secure each levy of the special tax. The lien of the special tax shall continue in force and effect until the special tax obligation is prepaid, permanently satisfied and 3-8 Ordinance No. Page 2 canceled in accordance with Section 53344 of the Government Code of the State of California or until the special tax ceases to be levied by the City Council in the manner provided in Section 53330.5 of said Government Code. SECTION 5. This Ordinance shall be effective thirty (30) days after its adoption. Within fifteen (15) days after its adoption, the City Clerk shall cause this Ordinance to be published in a newspaper of general circulation in the City pursuant to the provisions of Government Code Section 36933. PREPARED BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: Scott Tulloch City Engineer H:\ENGINEER\RESOS\R~sos2007\U 1-2J-07\CFD lJI'v1 OnJil1<1llce Authorizing Levy or Special T,uts.DOC 3-92 Exhibit "A" Rate and Method of Apportionment A-l 3-10 RATE AND METHOD OF ApPORTIONMENT CITY OF CHULA VISTA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 97-2 IMPROVEMENT AREA C ANNEXATION NO.6 (OTAY RANCH VILLAGETwo) A Special Tax of Commupjty Facilities District No. 97-2 (preserve Maintenance District) of the City of Chula Vista ("CFD") shall be levied on all Assessor's Parcels in Improvement Area C, Annexation No.6 (Otay Ranch Village Two), of the CFD and collected each Fiscal Year commencing with Fiscal Year 2006-2007 in an amount deternained through the application of the rate and method of apportionment of the Special Tax set forth below. All of the real property in the CFD, unless exempted by law or by the provisions hereof, shall be taxed for the purposes, to the extent and in the manner herein provided. A. DEFINITIDNS The terms hereinafter set forth have the following meanings: "Acre or Acreage" means the land area of an Assessor's Parcel as shown on an Assessor1s Parcel Map, or if the land area is not shown on an Assessoes Parcel Map, the land area shown on the applicable Final Subdivision Map, other final map, other parcel map, other condominium plan, or functionally equivalent map or instrument recorded in the Office of the County Recorder. The square footage of an Assessor's Parcel is equal to the Acreage multiplied by 43,560. "Act" means the Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982, as amended, being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, DiviSIOn 2 of Title 5 of the Government Code of the State of California. "Administrative Expenses" means the actual or estimated costs incurred by the City, acting for and on behalf of the CFD as the administrator thereof, to deternaine, levy and collect the Special Taxes, including salaries of City employees and a proportionate amount of the City's general administrative overhead related thereto, and the fees of consultants and legal counsel providing services related to the administration of the CFD; the costs of collecting installments of the Special Taxes; and any other costs required to administer Area C of the CFD as determined by the City. "Assessor's Parcel" means a lot or parcel shown in an AssessorTs Parcel Map with an assigned assessor's parcel number. "Assessor's Parcel Map" means an official map of the Assessor of the County designating parcels by assessor's parcel number. "Building Square Foot or Square Footage" means the square footage as shown on an Assessor's Parcel's building permit of Residential Property excluding garages or other II MuniFinancial Page 1 3-11 structures not used as living space. "CFD Administrator" means an official of the City, or designee thereof, responsible for determining the SpeClal Tax Requirement and providing for the levy and collection of the Special Taxes. "CFD" means Community Facilities District No. 97-2 of the City ofChula Vista. "City" means the City of Chula Vista. "City Clerk" means the City Clerk for the City of Chula Vista or his or her designee. "City Manager" means the City Manager for the City of Chula Vista or his or her designee. "Community Purpose Facility Property" or "CPF Property" means all Assessor's Parcels which are classified as community purpose facilities and meet the requirements of City of Chula Vista Ordinance No. 2883. "Council" means the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, acting as the legislative body of the CFD. "County" means the County of San Diego, California. "Developed Property" means all Taxable Property for which a building permit was issued prior to the March 1st preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied. "Final Map Property" means any residential lot or non-residential lot created by a Final Subdivision Map, but which is not classified as Developed Property. "Final Subdivision Map" means a subdivision of property creating residential or non- residential buildable lots by recordation of a final subdivision map or parcel map pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act (California Government Code Section 66410 et seq.), or recordation of a condominium plan pursuant to California Civil Code 1352, that creates individual lots for which building permits may be issued without further subdivision and is recorded prior to March 1 preceding the Fiscal Year in which the Special Tax is being levied. "Fiscal Year" means the period starting]uly 1 and ending on the following]une 30. "Improvement Area C" or "Area C" means Improvement Area C of the CFD, as identified on the boundary map for the CFD as amended from time to time. "Land Use Class" means any of the classes listed in Table 1, Table 2, or Table 3. "Maximum Special Tax" means the maximum Special Tax, detennined in accordance with Section C below that may be levied in any Fiscal Year on any Assessor's Parcel of Taxable Property. "Non-Residential Ptoperty" means all Assessor's Parcels of Developed Property for eMuniFinancial Page 2 3-12 \.vhich a building permit(s) has been issued for a structure or structures for non-residential lise. "Operating Fund" means a fund that shall be maintained within the CFD for each Fiscal Year to pay for Resource Monitoring and/ or Preserve Operations and Maintenance activities and Administrative Expenses. "Operating Fund Balance" means the amount of funds in the Operating Fund at the end of the preceding Fiscal Year. "Operating Fund Requirement" means for any Fiscal Year an amount equal to the Resource Monitoring Fund Requirement and the Preserve Operations and Maintenance Fund Requirement for the current Fiscal Year in which Special Taxes are levied. !'Preserve Operations and Maintenance" means those activities desCl'ibed in Attachment A hereto which is illcorporated herein by this reference. "Preserve Operations and Maintenance Fund Requirement" means for any Fiscal Year an amount equal to the budgeted costs for Preserve Operations and Mailltenance plus a pro- rata share of the budgeted Administrative Expenses of the District for the current Fiscal Year in which Special Taxes are levied. "Property Owner Association Property" means any property "'~thin the boundaries of Area C of the CFD that is owned by, or irrevocably dedicated as indicated in an instrument recorded with the County Recorder to, a property owner association, including any master or sub-association. "Public Property" means any property within the boundaries of Area C of the CFD that is, at the time of the CFD formation, expected to be used for any public purpose and is owned by or dedicated to the federal government, the State, the County, the City or any other public agency. "Reserve Fund" means a fund that shall be maintained for the CFD each Fiscal Year to provide necessary cash flow for the first six months of each Fiscal Year, working capital to cover monitoring, maintenance and repair cost overruns and delinquencies in the payment of Special Taxes and a reasonable buffer to prevent large variations in annual Special Tax levies. "Reserve Fund Balance" means the amount of funds in the Reserve Fund at t.~e end of the preceding Fiscal Year. "Reserve Fund Requirement" means an amount equal to up to 100% of the Operating Fund Requirement for any Fiscal Year. "Residential Property" means all Assessor's Parcels of Developed Property for which a building perrnit(s) has been issued for purposes of constructing one or more residential dwelling unit. "Resource Management Plan" means the Gtay Ranch Phase 1 Resource Management II MuniFinancial Page 3 3-13 Plan also referred to as "The Otay Ranch Resource Management Plan" dated October 28, 1993, and the Otay Ranch Phase 2, Resource Management Plan dated June 4,1996, as both such plans may be amended from time to time. "Resource Monitoring Program" means those described in Attachment B hereto which is incorporated herein by this reference. "Resource Monitoring Fund Requirement" means for any Fiscal Year an amount for each Improvement Area equal to the Improvement Area's fair share of the budgeted costs of the Resource Monitoring Program plus a pro rata share of the budgeted Administrative Expenses of the CFD for the current Fiscal Year in which Special Taxes are levied. Improvement Area C's "fail: share" shall be based on Improvement .!\.rea C's percentage of the total acreage within the Otay Ranch General Development Plan Planning Area for which a Resource Monitoring Program funding mechanism has been established. "Special Tax" means the Special Tax levied pursuant to the provisions of sections C and D below in each Fiscal Year on each Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property and Undeveloped Property in Area C to fund the Special Tax Requirement. "Special Tax Requirement" means that amount required in any Fiscal Year for Area C to: (i) pay the Resource Monitoring Fund Requirement, and Preserve Operations and Maintenance Fund Requirement, less the Operating Fund Balance, and (il) pay any amounts required to establish or replenish the Reserve Fund to the Reserve Fund Requirement; (Iii) pay for reasonably anticipated delinquent Special Taxes based on the delinquency rate for Special Taxes levied in the previous Fiscal Year. "State" means the State of California. "Taxable Property" means all of the Assessor's Parcels within the boundaries of Area C of the CFD that are not exempt from the Special Tax pursuant to law or as defined below. "Undeveloped Property" means, for each Fiscal Year, all Taxable Property not classified as Developed Property. III MuniFinancial Page 4 3-14 B. ASSIGNMENT TO CATEGORIES OF SPECIAL TAX Each Fiscal Year using the definitions above, all Taxable Property within Area C, Annexation No.6 (Otay Ranch Village Two), of the CFD shall be classified as Category I, Category II, Category III or Exempt. Developed Property, Final Map Property or Undeveloped Property, and shall be subject to Special Taxes pursuant to Sections C and D below. Developed Properry shall be further assigned to a Land Use Class as specified in Table 1. C. MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX RATE CATEGORY I Category I includes Developed Property within the District ("Category I"). The Maximum Special Tax for Resource Monitoring, and Preserve Operations and Maintenance for Fiscal Year 2006-2007 on Developed Property are the rates set forth in Table 1 below. For Residential Property, the Special Tax shall be levied based upon Building Square Footage and for Non-Residential Property shall be levied based on Acreage. TABLE 1 MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX FOR CATEGORY I COMMUNITY FACiLiTIES DISTRICT No. 97-2 IMPROVEMENT AREA C (FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007) Description Resource Operation & Total Monitoring Maintenance Residential $0.0062 sq ft $0.0099/ sq ft $0.0162/sq ft Non- $101.1797/acre $160.6303/acre $261.81/ acre Residential CATEGORY II Category II includes each Assessor's Parcel of Taxable Property within the District for which a Final Map has been recorded, but which is not classified as a Developed Parcel ("Category II") The Maximum Special Tax for Resource Monitoring, and Preserve Operations and Maintenance approved for Fiscal Year 2006-2007 on each Assessor's Parcel in Category II is the rate set forth in Table 2 below (said amount to be levied pro rata for any portion of an Acre). II MuniRnancial Page 5 3-15 TABLE 2 MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX FOR CATEGORY II COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT No. 97-2 IMPROVEMENT AREA C (FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007) Resource Operation & Toral Monitoring Maintenance $101.1797/acre $160 6303/acre $261.81/acre CATEGORY III Category III includes each Parcel of Taxable Property within the Disnict not subject to Special Tax under any other categOl"Y ("Category III"). The Maximum Special Tax approved for Fiscal Year 2006-2007 on Taxable Property within Category III is the rate set forth in Table 3 below (said amount to be levied pro rata for any portion of an Acre). TABLE 3 MAXIMUM SPECIAL TAX FOR CATEGORY III COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT No. 97-2 IMPROVEMENT AREA C (FISCAL YEAR 2006-2007) Resource Operation & Total Monitoring Maintenance $65.3004/acre $103.6696/acre $168.97/acre I EXEMPT CATEGORY The Exempt Category includes each property owned, conveyed or irrevocably offered for dedication to a public agency, or land which is in the public right-of-way, unmanned utility easements which make utilization for other than the purpose set forth in the easement impractical, common areas, private streets and parks, and open space lots ("Exempt Category") . IiMuniFmancial Page 6 3-16 SPECIAL CASES In some instances an Assessor's Parcel of Developed Property may contain more than one Land Use Class and be considered" Special Case". The Maximum Special Tax that may be levied on an Assessor's Parcel identified as Special Case shall be the sum of the Maximum Special Tax levies that may be levied on all Land Use Classes located on that Assessor's Parcel. The CFD i\dministrator shall determine the allocation to each Land Use Class. ANNuAL ESCALATION OF MAxIMUM SPECIAL TAX The Maximum Special Tax as shown in the tables above that may be levied on each Assessor's Parcel in Area C, Annexation No.6 (Otay Ranch Village Two), shall be increased each Fiscal Year beginning in Fiscal Year 2007-2008 and thereafter by a factor equal to the annual percentage change in the San Diego Metropolitan Area all Urban Consumer Price Index (iill Items). D. METHOD OF APPORTIONMENT OF THE SPECIAL TAX Commencing with Fiscal Year 2006-2007, and for each following Fiscal Year, the Council shall levy the Area C, Annexation No.6 (Otay Ranch Village Two), Special Tax at the rates established pursuant to steps 1 through 4 below so that the amount of the Special Tax levied equals the Special Tax Requirement. The Special Tax shall be levied each Fiscal Year as follows: Step 1: Determine the revenue which could be generated by Parcels assigned to Category I by multiplying the Building Square Footage for Parcels classified as Residential Parcels by the Maximum Special Tax per Building Square Foot for Resource Monitoring, and Preserve Operations and Maintenance for Parcels and adding to that the maximum revenue which could be generated by multiplying the total acres for Parcels classified as Non-Residential Parcels by the Maximum Special Tax per Acre for Resource Monitoring and Preserve Operations and Maintenance, Step 2: If the total revenue as calculated in Step 1 is greater than the estimated Special Tax Liability for Improvement Area C, reduce the Special Tax for each Parcel proportionately so that the Special Tax levy for the Fiscal Year is equal to the Special Tax liability for the Fiscal Year. Step 3: If the total revenue as calculated in Step 1 is less than the Special Tax Liability for Improvement Area C, a Special Tax shall be levied upon each Parcel within Improvement Area C, classified as Category II. The Special Tax for Parcels assigned to Category II shall be calculated as the lesser of: The Special Tax liability for Improvement Area C as determined by the City, less the total revenue generated for all Parcels under Step 1 above, divided by the total Acres for all Parcels within Improvement Area C assigned to Category II, Iii MuniFinancial Page 7 3-17 OR The Maximum Special Tax rate for Parcels assigned to Category II. Step 4: If the total revenue as calculated in Step 1 and 3 is less than the Special Tax liability, for Improvement Area C, a Special Tax shall be levied upon each Parcel within Improvement Area C classified as Category III. The Special Tax for Parcels assigned the Category III shall be calculated as the lesser of: The Special Tax liability for Improvement Area C as determined by the City, less the total revenue generated for all Parcels under Step 1 and 3 above, divided by the total Acres for all Parcels within Improvement Area C assigned to Category III, OR The Maximum Special Tax rate for Parcels assigned to Category III and within Improvement Area C. However, in the event it is determined that the Special Tax liability for Improvement Area C includes delinquent Special Taxes from Parcel in Category III from the prior Fiscal Year, the City shall determine the amount of delinquent taxes that arose from such Parcels and identify the owner(s). The amount of delinquent Special Taxes, if any, that arose from the applicable owner(s) shall first be divided by the total Categmy III Acres owned by such owner(s) and collected from the applicable owner(s) with the remaining portion of the Special Tax Liability not related to delinquent Special Taxes to be collected from all Parcels in Category III according to the procedure set forth in the preceding paragraph. Notwithstanding the above, under no circumstances will the Special Tax levied against any Assessor's Parcel of Residential Property or Multi-Family Property for which an occupancy permit for private residential use has been issued be increased by more than ten percent annually up to the Maximum Special Tax as a consequence of delinquency or default by the owner of any other Assessor's Parcel within Area C of the CFD. E. APPEALS Any landmvner or resident who pays the Special Tax and believes that the amount of the Special Tax levied on their Assessor's Parcel is in error shall first consult with the CFD Administrator regarding such error. If following such consultation, the CFD Administrator determines that an error has occurred, the CFD Administrator may amend the amount of the Special Tax levied on such Assessor's Parcel. If following such consultation and action, if any, by the CFD Administrator, the landowner or resident believes such error still exists, ilMuniRnancial Page 8 3-18 such person may file a written notice with the City Clerk of the City appealing the amount of the Special Tax levied on such Assessor's Parcel. Upon the receipt of any such notice, the City Clerk shall forward a copy of such notice to the City Manager who shall establish as part of the proceedings and administration of the CFD, a special three-member Review/Appeal Committee. The Review/Appeal Committee may establish such procedures, as it deems necessary to undertake the review of any such appeal. The Review/Appeal Cornrr>ittee shall interpret this Rate and Method of Apportionment and make determinations relative to the annual administration of the Special Tax and any landowner or resident appeals, as herein specified. The decision of the Review/Appeal Committee shall be final and binding as to all persons. F. MANNER OF COLLECTION Special Taxes levied pursuant to Section D above shall be collected in the same manner and at the same nrne as ordinary ad valorem property taxes; provided, however, that the CFD Administrator may directly bill the Special Tax, may collect Special Taxes at a different time or in a different manner if necessary to meet the financial obligations of Area C of the cill or as otherwise determined appropriate by the CFD Administrator. G. TERM OF SPECIAL TAX Taxable Property in Improvement Area C of the CFD shall remain subject to the Special Tax in perpetuity. & MuniFinancial Page 9 3-19 Attachment A Description of Preserve Operations and Maintenance Preserve Operations and Maintenance includes the maintenance, operation and management of the public or private property within boundaries of the Otay Ranch Preserve, as such boundaries may be modified from time to time, required by the Resource Management Plan to be maintained as open space or habitat preservation land or both. Such maintenance, operations and management shall include, but not be limited to, the following: (i) Preserve Maintenance. Development, implementation and ongoing provision of programs to maintain, operate and manage preserve habitat values through: cultivation, irrigation, trimming, spraying, fertilizing, and/or treatment of disease or injury; removal of trimmings, rubbish, debris and other solid waste; maintenance of trails; removal and control of exotic plant species (weeds); and control of cowbirds through trapping. (ii) Security. Development, implementation and ongoing provision of security programs to: enforce I'no trespassing" rules; curtail activities that degrade resources, such as grazing, shooting, and illegal dumping; remove trash, litter, and other debris; control access; prohibit off-road traffic; and maintain fences and trails. (iii) Preserve unprovements: Acquire equipment and/ or install improvements necessary to maintain, operate and manage the open space and habitat preservation land described above. The above description of the Preserve Operations and Maintenance is general in nature. The actual maintenance, operations and management of the open space and habitat preservation land within the Otay Ranch Preserve may be modified from time to time as necessary in order to effectively provide such services in compliance with the requirements of the Resource Management Plan. EMuniRnancial Page 10 3-20 Attachment B Description of Resource Monitoring Implement the annual biota monitoring and reporting program consistent with the Resource Management Plan to identify changes in the quality and quantity of preserve resources including wildlife species, sensitive plants and sensitive habitat types. The above description of the Resource Monitoring is general in nature. The actual monitoring and reporting program may be modified from time to time as necessaJ.! in order to effectively provide such services consistent vvith the requirements of the Resource Management Plan. BMuniFinancia! Page 11 3-21 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ~~ em OF -~ (HUlA VISTA 01/23/07 Item '- ITEM TITLE: DECLARE ELECTION RESUL TS REGARDING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY At"!D LEVY OF SPECIAL TAXES WITHIN ANNEXATION NO.6 (OTAY RANCH VILLAGE TWO), TO COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 97-2 (PRESERVE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT) SUBMITTED BY: REVIEWED BY: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATIVE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 97-2 (PRESERVE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT), DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A SPECIAL ELECTION IN THAT AREA DESIGNATED AS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 97-2 (PRESERVE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT), IMPROVEMENT AREA C, ANNEXATION NO.6 (OTAY RANCH VILLAGE TWO), AND ADDING SUCH TERRITORY TO SUCH COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT At"!D IMPROVEMENT AREA CITY ENGINEER P /:/ INTERIM ClTY MANAGER ijf 4/5THS VOTE: YES NO X BACKGROUND On November 21,2006, the City Council initiated the Community Facilities District No. 97-2 (Preserve Maintenance District) ("CFD No. 97-2") annexation proceedings by adoption of Resolutions 2006-347 and 2005-348. On January 9, 2007, the City Council approved certain findings and authoriZied the electors to vote on the annexation of Otay Ranch Village Two to CFD No. 97-2, Improvement Area C by adoption of Resolution 2007-009. On January 16, 2007, a Special Tax Election for CFD No. 97-2, Improvement I Area C, Annexation No.6, was conducted. Tonight's action is the next step in the formal proceedings to annex the territory within Otay Ranch Village Two into Improvement Area C of CFD No. 97-2. Improvement Area A funds the costs of the Resource 4-1 01/23/07, ltem~ Page 2 of3 Monitoring Program as well as Preserve Operations and Maintenance. Improvement Area B only funds the Resource Monitoring Program. Special taxes levied within Improvement Area C fund the costs of the Resource Monitoring Program as well as Preserve Operations and Maintenance consistent with the requirements of the Otay Ranch Resource Management Plan Phases 1 and II, plus a pro-rata share of Administrative Expenses of CFD No. 97-2. Otay Ranch Village Two will not be annexed into Improvement Area A or Improvement Area B. The City.has retained the services of MuniFinancial as special tax consultant and Best, Best, and Krieger, LLP, as legal counsel to provide assistance during the proceedings. RECOMMENDATION That Council: 1. Approve the resolution declaring the results of special election and adding such territory designated as CFD No. 97-2, Improvement Area C, Annexation No.6 (Otay Ranch Village Two) to CFD No. 97-2, Improvement Area C. BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Not Applicable DISCUSSION In July 1998, Council formed CFD No. 97-2 (Preserve Maintenance District). CFD No. 97-2 was originally divided into two Improvement Areas, Improvement Area A and Improvement Area B, that were designated when CFD No. 97-2 was formed. Special taxes levied within Improvement Area A fund the costs of the Resource Monitoring Program as well as Preserve Operations and Maintenance within the initial boundaries of the Otay Ranch Preserve. Special taxes levied within Improvement Area B only fund the Resource Monitoring Program within that same area. Special taxes levied within Improvement Area C pay for both Preserve Operations and Maintenance and the Resource Monitoring Program consistent with the requirements of the Otay Ranch Resource Management Plan Phases I and II plus a pro-rata share of Administrative Expenses ofCFD No 97-2. It is necessary to annex territory into Improvement Area C of CFD No. 97-2; as such boundaries may be modified from time to time. Resolution The City Clerk, acting as the designated election official, has held a special election within the territory proposed to be annexed to CFD No. 97-2, Improvement Area C, on January 16, 2007 at which time the qualified electors of such territory, being the owners of land within such territory, were entitled to vote on a ballot proposition to authorize the levy of the special taxes described above within such territory. The results of the election showed that the annexation and levy of special tax were approved by the electors. There is one Resolution on today's agenda, which, if adopted, will accomplish the following: 4-2 01123/07, Item~ Page 3 of3 1. Declare the results of the special election held on January 16, 2007 for annexation 6 ofCFD 97-2 2. Order the annexation of Otay Ranch Village Two to Improvement Area C of CFD No. 97-2. DECISION MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council and has found no property holdings within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property which is the subject ofthis action. FISCAL IMP ACT All costs of the annexation to the district are being paid by the developers and the on- going administration of the CFD will be funded entirely by CFD No. 97-2. The City will recover the full cost for staff time involved in the annexation from the developer and full cost of staff time for administration ofCFD No. 97-2 from the CFD, in perpetuity. Prepared by: Boushra Salem, Senior Civil Engineer, Engineering Department 4-3 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFOR.1"\;1A, ACTING IN ITS CAPACITY AS THE LEGISLATNE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 97-2 (pRESERVE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT), DECLARING THE RESULTS OF A SPECLiU ELECTION IN THAT AREA DESIGNATED AS COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 97-2 (PRESERVE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT), I.MPROVEMENT AREA "C," ANNEXATION NO.6 AND ADDING SUCH TERRITORY TO SUCH IMPROVEMENT AREA WHEREAS, the CITY C01JNCIL of the CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFOR.c"lIA (the "City Council"), has previously undertaken proceedings to annex certain property to an existing Community Facilities District and an Improvement Area designated therein pursuant to the terms and provisions of the "Mello-Roos Community Facilities Act of 1982," being Chapter 2.5, Part 1, Division 2, Title 5 of the Govemment Code of the State of California (the "Act") and the City of Chula Vista Community Facilities District Ordinance enacted pursuant to the powers reserved by the City of Chula Vista under Sections 3, 5 and 7 of Article XI of the Constitution of the State of California (the "Ordinance") (the Act and the Ordinance may be referred to collectively as the "Community Facilities District Law"). This Community Facilities District and the Improvement Area are referred to as COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 97-2 (PRESERVE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT) and IMPROVEMENT AREA "C," respectively, and the property proposed to be annexed is referred to as ANNEXATION NO. 6 (the "Annexation Area"); and, WHEREAS, this City Council did call for and order to be held an election to submit to the qualified electors of the Annexation Area a proposition relating to the levy of special taxes within the Annexation Area; and, WHEREAS, at this time said election has been held and the measure voted upon and each such measure did receive the favorable 2/3's vote of the qualified electors, and this City Council desires to declare the results of the election in accordance with the provisions of the Elections Code of the State of California and to order that the Annexation Area be added to Improvement Area "C." NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, ACTING AS THE LEGISLATNE BODY OF COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 97-2 (pRESERVE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT), DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DECLARE, FIND, DETER.c\.1INE AND ORDER AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. The above recitals are all true and correct. SECTION 2. This City Council hereby receives and approves the CERTIFICATE OF ELECTION OFFICIAL AND STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST, as submitted by the City Clerk, acting in her capacity as the Election official, said Statement setting forth the number of votes cast in the election, the measure voted upon, and the number of votes given for and/or against the 4-4- I measure voted upon. A copy of said Certificate and Statement IS attached hereto, marked Exhibit "A," referenced and so incorporated. SECTION 3. The City Clerk is hereby directed, pursuant to the provlSlons of the Elections Code of the State of California, to enter in the minutes the results of the election as set forth in said STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST. SECTION 4. This City Council does hereby determine and declare that the Annexation Area is now added to and becomes a part of Improvement Area "C" of the District. The City Council hereby further determines that the City Council is now authorized to levy the special . taxes within the Annexation Area as approved and authorized by the qualified electors of the Annexation Area. PREPARED BY: APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: :J~~aQvJ \., 'V v ~ [/)ore City lif.torney Scott Tulloch City Engineer 4-25 EXHIBIT "A" CERTIFICATE OF ELECTION OFFICIAL AND STATEMENT OF VOTES CAST STATE OF CALIFORl'iIA ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ss. CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) The undersigned, ELECTION OFFICIAL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DOES HEREBY CERTIFY that pursuant to the provisions of Section 53326 of the Government Code and Division 12, commencing with Section 17000 of the Elections Code of the State of California, I did canvass the returns of the votes cast at the CITY OF CHULA VISTA COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 97-2 (PRESERVE MAINTENANCE DISTRICT) IMPROVEMENT AREA "c" AN'NEXA TION AREA NO.6 SPECIAL ELECTION in said City, held January 16,2007. I FURTHER CERTIFY that this Statement of Votes Cast shows the whole number of votes cast in the Annexation Area of the District in said City, and the whole number of votes cast for the Measure in the Annexation Area of the District in said City, and the totals as shown for the Measure are full, true and correct. 1. TOTAL NUMBER OF VOTES CAST: II. VOTES CAST ON PROPOSITION A: ~ YES 738 NO 0 WITNESS my hand and Official Seal this day of ,2007. CITY CLERK ELECTION OFFICIAL CITY OF CHULA VISTA STATE OF CALIFORNIA ~~ CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ~f:. CITY OF -~ (HULA VISTA January 23, 2007 Item2- ITEM TITLE: RESOLUTION APPROVING THE SUBMITTAL OF THREE GRANT APPLICATIONS TO THE SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (SANDAG) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2007-08 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPlWENT ACT (TDA) AND TRANS NET FUNDING I FOR BICYCLE A.c~D PEDESTRIAN PROJECTS, CITY ENGI~EER .1,) ~ INTERIM CITY MANAGER II SUBMITTED BY: REVIEWED BY: 4/5THS VOTE: YES NO X BACKGROUND The Transportation Development Act ITDA) and the TransNet Program provide fimding support for regional bicycle and pedestrian capital improvement projects. SAc"iDAG allocates those project funds to cities in the San Diego region based upon fimding availability and project ranking. Staff has prepared funding applications fOf three projects. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Bayshore Bikeway Preliminary Design:: The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed grant application for funds to prepare the Bayshore Bikeway Preliminary Design for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is not a "Project" as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines at this time; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060 (c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines the activity is not subj ect to CEQA. Although envirolt1mental review is not necessary at this time, once a project has been defined, enviro11Il1ental review will be required and a CEQA determination completed priOf to commencing any development activities. Iinstallation of the Bay Boulevard Bike Lane and Pedestrian Traffic Signal Upgrades: The Environmental Review Coordinatof has reviewed the proposed grant applications for installation of the Bay Boulevard Bike Lane and the installation of Pedestrian Traffic Signal Upgrades for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) 5-1 1/23/07, Item~ Page 2 of 4 and has determined that they qualify for a Class I categorical exemption pursuant to Section 15301(c) (Existing Facilities) of the State CEQA Guidelines because they involve the on-going operation of existing facilities. Thus, no further environmental reVlew IS necessary. RECOMMENDATION That Council adopt the resolution and approve submittal oft~e applications. BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: N/A DISCUSSION This grant submission process has been an annual occurrence and has traditionally had a submittal deadline in April. The City was just made aware that the submission deadline was revised to February 5, 2007. It is our understanding that the City's grants office will be presenting an overall summary of this year's known grant opportunities and City proj ects identified for submission, which will be presented to Council in the coming weeks. Unfortunately, this grant opportunity arose in advance of that report and thus must be brought separately to City Council to meet the new February 5th deadline. The City is eligible to compete for funding on an annual basis for bicycle and pedestrian projects under the following programs: Transportation Development Act (TDA): This fund provides support for the region's public transit and non-motorized transportation projects, including sidewalk and bicycle lane improvements. The revenue comes from V. % of the 7V. % retail sales tax coHected statewide and distributed by county. Each year, SANDAG is locally responsible for the allocation ofTDA funds in conformance with legislative and region-wide priorities. TransNet Program: In 1987, San Diego County voters approved a half-cent sales tax to finance transportation projects. County voters subsequently approved Proposition A in November 2004 which enacted a 40-year extension of TransNet. A portion of TransNet is used to finance bicycle facilities. This funding is combined with local, state and federal dollars to improve the region's transportation network. SANDAG's call for projects included a copy of the revised Bicycle and Pedestrian Claim Guidelines (see Attachment A), which are used to administer this program. City of Chula Vista Applications for IT 2007-08 Each year, the City participates in the claim process for TDA and TransNet bicycle and pedestrian project funds by submitting an updated list of projects to SANDAG. The evaluation process for TDA bicycle and pedestrian projects and TransNet bicycle projects is consistent with the way SANDAG evaluates and prioritizes other components of the transportation system such as arterial, highway, and transit projects. In addition, the selection criteria support the overall goals and objectives SANDAG has for improving the regional transportation system and promoting smart growth in the region by giving priority to projects that enhance the existing transportation network as a whole. The 5-2 1/23/07, Item2- Page 3 of 4 criteria to be used in the evaluation protess are specified in the Project Selection Criteria matrix for each project (see Attachment B). I For FY 2007-08, it is recommended that the City apply for funding for the following proposed bicycle and pedestrian impro}/ement projects, which are further detailed in the draft grant applications provided in Attachment B. These applications will be finalized prior to the February 5 due date. I. Bavshore Bikewav Preliminary Design: The regional Bayshore Bikeway Plan was created through a collaborative process led by SANDAG. It was completed and distributed by SAt"lDAG in March 2006. The Plan involves completing a 24- mile bikeway from the foot of Broadway in downtown San Diego along the bay to Imperial Beach, then back along the Silver Strand to Coronado. Recommendations related to Chula Vista include completing the Class II bike lane along Bay Boulevard (see Project #2), as well as constructing a Class I bike path from the current northerly termination at E Street to the southerly portion of the bike path at Main Street. Tbe construction cost of the bike path is estimated to be approximately $2.0 million. The recommended aligmnent follows the SDG&E right-of-way. Although final design and constmction of this facility cannot commence until completion of the Bayfront environmental documents and utility undergrounding (to be completed by June 200$), funding for preliminary design would enable work on the project to progress as soon as it is feasible. This work could involve identification of necessary right-of-way acquisition and project constraints, environmental studies and proposed mitigation, discussions with SDG&E and other stakeholders, and recommendations for the final aligmnent and project financing. The cost of preliminary engineering is estimated to be $300,000, and the application of TDNTransNet funds will be for the total amount. It is recommended that the work on this project commence after completion of the Bayfront Environmental Impac~ Report (EIR), since this document is expected to identify environmental constrairtts relating to this project. 2. Bav Boulevard Bike Lane betw~en F Street and J Street: This proposed project is recommended by both the City's Bikeway Master Plan (adopted in January 2005) and the Bayshore Bikeway Plan. It consists of installing approximately 5,450 centerline feet of Class II bike lane on Bay Boulevard within the existing paved roadway between F Street and J Street. The total estimated cost of the project is $138,575. The total applicationrequest for TDAlTransNet funds is $54,520. The remaining $84,055 represents the cost of applying rubberized slurry seal to a portion of Bay Blvd. and the application of striping and pavement legends not related to the bike lane. This portion of the project will be included under STL- 316, Pavement Rehabilitation 06-07, which is included in the City's portion of TransNet funding for local streets and roads. 3. Pedestrian Traffic Signal Upgrade TF-323 & TF-328: This project will be done under the City's FY2006-07 Upgrade of Pedestrian Indications Program TF-323 5-3 1/23/07, Item~ Page 4 of 4 and FY2006-07 Audible Pedestrian Signal Modifications Program TF-328. The proposed project consists of upgrading pedestrian crossing signal facilities at twelve (12) intersections within the public right-of-way that directly serve schools in western Chula Vista. The general scope of work is to upgrade existing pedestrian indications to "countdown" indication, and to install audible pedestrian signal crossings. The total cost of the project is $113,920. The total application request for TDA/TransNet funds is $78,920. Contributions would be $10,000 from TF-323 and $25,000 from TF-328, both finance'd by the Traffic Signal Fund. All work will take place in existing street right-of-way. DECISION MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council and has found no property holdings within 500 feet of the boundaries of the properties which are the subject of this action. FISCAL IMPACT There is no impact to the General Fund. Potential revenue to the City from TransNet and TDA would be $433,440. There are sufficient funds in STL-316, TF-323 and TF-328 to provide the matching funds. ATTACHMENTS A. SANDAG's "Bicycle and Pedestrian Claims Guidelines" B. Draft Grant Applications for Transportation Development Act! TransNet Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects Prepared by: Elizabeth Chopp, Senior Civil Engineer, Engineering Department. J: IEngineerlAGENDA \CAS2 007\0 1-23-07\ TDA Funding A pplications.emc. doc 5-4 Attachment A BICYCLE AND PEI)ESTRIAN CLAIM GUIDELINES Introduction The following describes the claim process for Transportation Del'elopment Act (TDA) bicycle and pedestrian projects and TransNet bicycle projects. Project Eligibility and the Regional Housing Needs Incentives Program On April 28, 2006, the SANDAG Board of Directors adopted Board Policy No. 033 entitled: Implementation Guidelines for SANDAG Regional Housing Needs Assessment Memorandum. This policy sets forth guidelines for incentives related to the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) for the 2005-2010 housing element cycle, which was adopted by the SANDAG Board on February 25, 2005. As part of the approval of the Final RHNA for the San Diego region, the Board agreed to grant certain financial incentives to jurisdictions that provide a greater share of affordable housing now and in the future. Board Policy No. 033 identifies the funding programs that will be subject to the RHNA policy, the housing element-related eligibility requirements for the funding programs affected by the policy, and how incentive points will be allocated based on lower income housing production. In order to be eligible for TDAlTransNet bicycle and pedestrian funds for the FY 2008 funding cycle, prior to the application due date jurisdictions must: 1. have adopted a housing element that has been found in compliance with state law by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (HCD) (Section 2.4.2 of Policy No. 033); 2. have submitted information to SANDAG regarding the actual production of housing units in all four income categories (very low, low, moderate, and above moderate) (Sections 2.4.3 and 2.4.3.1); and 3. have (if applicable) provided informatiqn to SANDAG regarding progress toward complying with any rezoning programs contained in its housing element that are required to meet the adequate site identification requirements of state law (Sections 2.4.3 and 2.4.3.1). TDA Project Eligibility The law specifies that the money should be aillocated according to the regulations adopted by SANDAG as the regional transportation planning agency. It also identifies certain categories of eligible projects. These specific project types represent neither an exhaustive list, nor are they listed as priorities (Public Utilities Code Sections 99233.3 and 99234). They are summarized below for reference. Project selection criteria, established by SANDAG Board policy, are discussed later. . Construction, including related engineering expenses, of bicycle and pedestrian facilities. . Maintenance of bicycle trails provided they are closed to motorized traffic. 1 5-5 . Projects serving the needs of commuting bicyclists, including but not limited to, new paths serving major transportation corridors, secure bicycle parking at employment centers, park-and-ride lots, and transit centers where other funds are not available. . A comprehensive bicycle and pedestrian facilities plan (no more than once every five years), with an emphasis on bicycle projects Intended to primarily accommodate nonrecreationai bicycle trips. . Up to 20 percent of the cost to restripe Class II bicycle lanes. . Up to 5 percent of the amount available to a city or the county may be expended in conjunction with other funds to support bicycle safety education programs, so long as the funds are not used to fully fund the salary of anyone person. TransNet Project Eligibility TransNet bicycle funds may be expended for all purposes necessary and convenient to the design, right- of-way acquisition, and construction of facilities intended for use by bicyclists. These funds also may be used for programs that help to encourage the use of bicycles, such as secure parking facilities, bicycle promotion programs, and safety programs. Pedestrian projects are not eiigible under the TransNet program. Certain costs at times associated with bicycle and pedestrian projects are not eligible when the benefit provided is not the exclusive use of bicyclists or pedestrians. These instances are listed below. Curb and gutter are part of the roadway drainage system. As such, newly instalied curb and gutter cannot be considered an improvement exclusively for the benefit of the sidewalk or bike lane and are not an eligible expense. . Driveway ramps Installed across sidewalks are not for the benefit of pedestrians, and in fact, degrade the pedestrian environment. Claimants may not include the cost of driveway ramps in applications for sidewalk projects. However, the distance across the driveway may be included when computing the per-square-foot cost of the sidewalk. . Where roadway design standards require a roadway shoulder width at least as wide as would be required for a standard bike lane, the cost of the shoulder construction will not be eligible. Appropriate bikeway signage is eligible. Under some circumstances, it may be necessary to remove and replace curb and gutter, driveway ramps, drainage facilities and other existing improvements in order to construct a bikeway or sidewalk. In such cases the cost of this work is most likely eligible, but ciaimants should carefully document why this is so in the claim submittal. 2 5-6 SANDAG Claim Requirements SANDAG has the authority to establish criteria applicable to analyzing and evaluating claims for non- motorized transportation facilities (Public Utilities Code Section 99401). To be considered for funding, a claim must be consistent with SANDAG's adopted non-motorized plans and meet the requirements for community support and geometric design standards as described in Categories 1 and 2 of the Project Selection Criteria. In addition, the following requirements must be met; if applicable: . If the project abuts other jurisdictions, it must be shown on the adopted plans of the adjacent jurisdictions, or a letter must be submitted from the abutting jurisdiction showing that cooperative efforts are underway. . Other sources of funding for cooperative projects must be identified. Please attach supporting documentation that shows matching funds have been secured. Matching funds that have not been secured will not be considered in the matching funds section of the project scoring matrix. . Projects which are a required element of a larger capital improvement project are not eligible for funding. . No single agency may submit an application, or applications, that are greater than the total availabie allocation for that fiscal year. Application Process Applications for TDA and TransNet non-motorized claims must be received by SANDAG by February 5, 2007. To be considered for funding, the Annual Grant Application must be fully completed. In addition, please consider the following, if applicable: . All claims, including those supporting ed~cational or promotional programs and claims for planning projects, must include a project budget, work program, and project schedule. . No later than April 3, 2007, include a certified copy of a resolution or minute order in which the planning group, planning commission, or governing body of the claimant authorizes the claim. . Review Panel - A review panel of six to eight working group members will conduct a full preliminary review of the project applications to id~ntify significant issues and request clarification from the project appiicants if necessary. Participation on the review panel is open to any active working group member. Applicants must submit rinultiple hard copies of their applications for distribution to the review panel. Completed applications to be available bnline - Applicants must submit their application In PDF format as well as hard copy. Electronic ~ersion of the applications will be posted to the internet to give any working group member the oppdrtunlty to review the applications. 3 5-7 Evaluation Process The evaluation process for TDA bicycle and pedestrian projects and TransNet bicycle projects is consistent with the way SANDAG evaluates and prioritizes other components of the transportation system such as arterial, highway, and transit projects. Transportation project priorities are established in planning documents like the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), MOBILITY,. 2030. Priorities also are used for funding decisions that are programmed in the Regional Transportation Improvement Program (RTIP). In addition, the selection criteria supports the overall goals and objectives SANDAG has for improving the regional transportation system and promoting smart growth in the region by giving priority to projects that enhance the existing transportation network as a whole. The criteria to be used in the evaluation process are specified in the Project Selection Criteria matrix. Claimants for TDA bicycle and pedestrian projects and TransNet bicycle projects will be responsible for accurately filling out the Annual Grant Application and the accompanying Project Selection Criteria matrix. SANDAG will be responsible for performing the GIS Analysis in Category 6 and the Cost Benefit Analysis in Category 11 of the Project Selection Criteria based on the process outlined below. SANDAG will compile the results from the Grant Applications and produce a prioritized list of projects that will be reviewed by the Bicycle-Pedestrian Working Group (BPWG). The committee will then recommend a final priority list of projects to the SANDAG Transportation Committee, which will then be approved by the SANDAG Board of Directors. . Regional Housing Needs Incentive - Project eligibility and incentive points will be based on the formula adopted in SANDAG Board of Directors adopted Board Poi icy No. 033 entitled: Implementation Guidelines for SANDAG Regional Housing Needs Assessment Memorandum. . The GIS Analysis will be based on the following five factors: total population, total employment, population density, employment density, and number of activity centers. Using the project limits provided by the claimant, SANDAG will perform the GIS Analysis using data for population and employment forecasts for 2010. A buffer will be created around each project area. Pedestrian projects will be given a half-mile buffer and bicycle projects will be given a one-mile buffer. The buffered areas will be used along with the population and employment data to generate population and employment densities. The number of Activity Centers, as identified by SANDAG's data warehouse, will be identified and tallied. Each factor will be scored from 1 to 4 points, for a possible total of 20 points for the GIS Analysis category. Projects will be scored in each category relative to each other by taking the raw scores and distributing them from highest to lowest. The highest 25 percent will receive 4 points, the second highest quartile will receive 3 points, the third highest quartile will receive 2 points, and the lowest quartile will receive 1 point. . The Cost Benefit Analysis will be computed by taking the subtotal score from categories 1 through 8 on the Project Selection Criteria matrix and dividing that subtotal by the grant application amount. Projects will be scored relative to each other by taking the raw scores and distributing them from highest to lowest, with the project with the highest cost benefit ratio receiving 15 points and the project with the lowest cost benefit ratio receiving 1 point. 4 5-8 ATTACHMENT B DRAFT GRANT APPLICATIONS FOR TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT/ TRANSNET BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN ACTS 5-9 FY 2008 Annj.Jal Grant Application Transportation Development Actl'TransNet Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects Applicant (Agency): Citv of Chula Vista Project Name: 12 Schools Pedestrian Improvements Application Amount: $78.920 Project Type: UpQradinQ of pedestrian facilities Project Limits: Various locations (see m'lP attchedl Project Description: UpQradinQ of pedestrian crossinQ siQnal facilities at 12 intersections within the public riQht of wav. that direc~lv serve schools in western Chula Vista. UpQrade existinQ pedestrian indications to "colflntdown" indication. and installation of audible pedestrian siQnal crossin!!. Summary of Cost Estimates: CateQorv Feasibility Study Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Constructibn Total Cost Funding Sources: Revenue Source TDAlTransNet Claim Amount Traffic Si(jnal Fund (TF-323) Traffic Signal Fund (TF-328) Cost n/a n/a n/a 15,000 98,920 $113,920 Amount $78,920 $10,000 $25,000 Total $113,920 Project Location Map: See attached map. The proposed locations are: 1 Hilltop Drive / Ped Xing, between Kingswood Drive & Jicama Way 2 Hilltop Drive and Quintard Street 3 Hilltop Drive and J Street 4 Fourth Avenue and Palomar Street 5 Broadway and Flower Street 6 Hilltop Drive and I Street 7 First Avenue and E Street 8 Fifth Avenue and E Street 9 Fourth Avenue and Anita Street 10 Second Avenue and Orange Avenue 11 Second Avenue and Palomar Street 12 Fifth Avenue and Palomar Street 1 5-10 Contact Person: Roberto Solorzano Tille: Associate Enllineer Address 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista. California 91910 Phone: 619-409-5420 Fax: '619-691-5171 E-mail: sololalci.chula-vista.ca.us Person Authorized to Submit Application: I certify that I have reviewed the Bicycle and Pedestrian Claims Guidelines and the information submitted in this application is accurate and in accordance with these guidelines, Elizabeth Chopp Senior Civil Engineer Name Title Signature Date 2 5-11 Proiect Fundine: Total Estimated Project Cost (Please attach a detailed project estimate based on best availabl~ engineering) $113.920 Revenues (Source and Amount): Matching Funds (Category 9 of Project Selection Criteria) Revenue Source Amount Traffic Sional Fund (TF-323) $10.000 Traffic Slenal Fund (TF-328) $25.000 Total $35,000 TDAlTransNet (Application Amount as $hown in Category 10 of Project Selection Criteria) $78.920 TotalRevenues $113,920 Project Cost Estimates - On a separate sreet provide an itemized cost estimate for all eligible expenses. Be as accurate as possible to avoid future cost overruns. Projects with cost overruns have three options for moving the project f~rward depending on what percentage over the originai grant amount the revised project cost will qe. Applicants may ask for a recommendation from the BPWG to amend original allocation for up 10 five percent of the original cost estimate (up to the amount available in the reserve). Projects that require more than five percent additional funding can resubmit the project in a subsequent f~nding cycle with the adjusted project amount. Lastly, the applicant can choose to complete the project with their own funding. SUDDortine Materials A. Communitv Support/Consistencv wit~ Communitv Plan (Cateeorv 1) - The councilor governing board of the applicant must authorize this grant application. Please attach a copy of the resolution or minute order documenting that action. Or, if the project is part of an approved Bicycle Plan, please attach a,copy of the section that includes the project. The proposed project is included in the City's adopted 2007 Capital Improvement Program (See copies attached,) A certified copy of the Chula Vista Council resolution authorizing the application and cilrtifying matching funds, will be submitted by April 3, 2007 B. Minimum Desion Standards (Cateoorv 2) - Projects applying for construction funds must provide actual drawings or cross-sections from the project itself, not generic standard drawings. If the applicant is seeking funding for the design and construction of a project, proposed cross-sections may be usecj in lieu of the actual plan drawings. If any part of a project is substandard, clearly illustrate that (provide photographs, if applicable) and provide an explanation as to why the minimum design standard is not being met. 3 5-12 This is a retrofit project to install audible pedestrian and countdown indications on existing traffic signal standards. All installations would be done by the City's traffic signal technicians. C. Connect to Reaional Transportation Corridor or Transit Linkaae or Realonal Bikewav Map (Cateaorv 3) - Provide a map which clearly illustrates the projects relationship to existing facilities. Show the project's direct linkages to any regional b.ikeway (for bicycle projects) or direct continuous link to a local bus stop or direct link to an LRT/reglonal transit station. A direct link for a bicycle project is defined as connecting immediately to a regional bikeway with no gaps. A direct link between a pedestrian project and a transit facility is defined as one In which some part of the facility comes within 600 feet of a local bus stop or LRT/reglonal transit station. This is a retrofit project to install audible pedestrian and countdown indications on existing traffic signal standards. See attached map D. Completes Connection/Linkaae In Existina BIcvcle/Pedestrian Network (Cateaorv 4) - List and briefly describe the linkages or connections to existing bicycle or pedestrian network. Provide a map that clearly illustrates the projects relationship to existing facilities. The attached map illustrates the urban network of existina sidewalks, bike lanes, bike routes, and pedestrian crossing signals in the project area. The map also identifies the intersections targeted for signal uoarades. and where those upgrades will enhance the safety and serviceability of the existing network. E. Prolect Readiness (Cateoorv 5) This installation of all pedestrian countdown indication and audible signals will be done in-house. Only materials and equipment will be advertised for bids. Phase Beain Comolete Feasibility Study n/a n/a Preliminary Engineering n/a n/a Environmental Document/Certification n/a n/a Finai Des Ign Feb 2008 Feb 2008 Advertise for Construction (Equipment) March 2008 March 2008 Begin Construction (In-house) Mav 2008 June 2008 Project Completion June 2008 F. Geoaraphic Factors/GIS Analvsis (Cateaorv 6) - SANDAG will perform a GIS analysis as described In the Bicycle and Pedestrian Claims Guidelines based upon a project map provided by the applicant. Briefiy describe project limits and provide a location map clearly showing the project alignment. In addition, clearly show and label the following elements: 4 5-13 a. major traffic generators within the project area (within )I,-mile for pedestrian projects and within 1-mile fqr bicycle projects) b. linkage or connections to eJ<isting bicycle or pedestrian facilities c. linkage to any regional bike'IVay or public transit stop The proposed project will provide a safer street crossing for school children and adults. G. GeoGraphic Factors/GIS Analvsis (CateGorv 6) - List and briefiy describe major traffic generators served by the project. All project locations are within a qu~rter of a mile buffer of an elementary, middle or high school. See attached map. H. Safetv improvements (CateGorv 7) - Describe the safety issues addressed by the project. Please attach support documentation for safety and accident history. If collision data is , provided, it must be specific in pointing but which collisions are applicable to the project and why it is relevant. The proposed project will provide safer facilities between destinations to schools, churches, shopping areas, and parks, i In the past 3 years, there have been four (4) traffic accidents involving pedestrians within the project area. (see attached i1ccident history). I. Innovation and Oesiqn (Cateqorv 8) - 06scribe any design innovations for bicycle/pedestrian priority measures that are included within the project limits. Is this project in your agency's adopted capitbl improvement program (Y/N) y. If the project is part of a larger capital improvement project, briefiy discuss how the bicycle or pedestrian project costs were identified and a description of the other sources of funds for the , overall project. Briefly describe any other aspects of the project that is relevant to its evaluation. 5 5-14 Bicycle Master Plans. Pedestrian Master Plans. Education/Safety ProQrams and Bicycle ParkinQ Bicycle Master Plans, Education/Safety Programs and Bicycle Parking projects will each be considered in a separate category. These types of projects are encouraged and will be evaluated by SANDAG staff. Basic Guidelines Bicycle Master Plans - Cities with population up to 75,000 will be eligible for a maximum of $75,000. Cities with population greater than 75,000 will be eligible for a maximum of $150,000. Beginning with the 2008 project application cycle, all cities will need to have a SANDAG- approved Bicycle Plan to be eligible for TDAlTransNet funds for individual projects. Pedestrian Master Plans - An agency may submit an application for a pedestrian master plan no more frequently than once every five years. Jurisdictions with a popuiation over 150,000 may submit applications for up to $150,000, and jurisdictions with a population under 150,000 may submit applications up to $100,000. In either case, the amount of the appiication must be substantiated by providing a scope of work and project budget to SANDAG. Education/Safety Programs - An agency must submit a scope of work and a proposed schedule to be evaluated by SANDAG staff. Bicycle Parking - Projects that conform to SANDAG's Bicycle Parking Guidelines and have a projected cost up to $50,000 will be eligible. All claims, including those supporting educational or promotional programs and ciaims for planning projects, must include a project budget. work program, and project schedule. 6 5-15 ~!I?- --n- ~$~ CJtl'".Of CHUlA VI5TA Citiy of Chula Vista ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT Infrastructure Services Project Number: TF-323; TF-328 Project Title: 12 Schaal Pedestrian Improvements Description: Upgrade existing pedestrian indications to "countdown" indication, and installation of audible pedestrian signal crossing. Date Prepared By: Checked By: 9-Jan-07 Roberto Solorzano Beth Chopp ~___L Quantity I unitl Unit Price lill!l~il~ii~]!; ...__1.l6.~.<!ibl."E_e.cI._:3Jg~i3_1~.._._.__.__..____..____________~~___._._JEl_______.L~A..L.______~~?~:~9_:.____________E~"~?9.9.Q_ 2iADA Pedestrian Push Buttons ! 80 : EA i $145.00: $11 60000 ........w..<-._...._~.......~.....'.,.........._~~.__...._._....w__..~~...m-._......_.............._~.w___...~.m.........n...::_fi'...._n....._.....m.._.~_...........w.,~._.~.......................m._.......,:......................................__......2.............:...._.... .........3.i.L.~p_~"-~ntd."-:N.-":3tyl~.P_E.Q.~-"_dul.~..._.............._...,___.i_.........ll.~___....L.~t..___._.:s.~()'O"()9.L__...._.........._....~<l2.,9'O_(). 00 i 5" x 7" Pedestrian Push Button Frame Assembly w/4- ' , i ' ......... ) ( : .............~.Ip.a.r:t~~.~si~.n.............................. ................................................ ...... ~0............,...E..6.1...............:s.55. 00'..............................$.<l,.4:9.9.,9.9.. .l-..-'._.,.-~..w,.--^.,~.,~.,.V^'-,.w.-.""-~'---~w~~'^~^~_~~,_,_~_._._',~v.;._~_.^y^~.,.~~_~~_.~__,.__....J...~w~~.!~_~.~~.~,_~_~_.w'c~.~~.~"y.:.w~,_y~.w~c_.._~.. ...................................................."...........................................".................~................................~............t....................................:~............. , :, : ~_~_,~~,,_>__~_~_____~.___~,~_~,~~~~___~__.___,..____._______~,__--'.-_~_-...__.;"'__~~_~~"'_._c__-<_u~'''_~~,~u'u~~__._,,_~__J_'''_.._m , ~: ,: : .V^'.~w.w~_.r___w__-._~_,.w~W'^'....'"'.'"'.,w_w~_____~_~~__~'^~w.,~~w_~___'~'^_.v~w>.~..W^.'---::.,~~~_.~._~.~_~y^..-.:.~'~~w.w~.~,.~~y._'~^y.'w,_"'_'___.:___w_..w__w...______~_._'_w,~w~w..,~..__w.,~..~'"_ , w.___..__.._,__,___ .W.Y~MW_'.~_'-..~y. .._..WNU..._'._,,,._^V.W,~~_.__~__~_.~__~~_~~~.W~W."_,~__::_____,~____._"'-."'~_"'_,_~.:....~~____~~"'__,J,W__~_,_.."'__M__.._~__w___w.___~_,~v~.._~_,.v,.~,.~,~__,..,__."'. . ......................................... ............................................. ............. ......... .........:............,......................... " ' ':. . : :: ::' :. . . ., "'..,_w.,.w._...'___~___~.~_,~.~_"'__""~_.~___....._~~_____w.__w.w~~"'~__w__'w____.w.w__....,.,~~~,.y,.~~.~"'._".w~.~w.,,:.y.w.y.y"'",.,..w~__~~~..~_"'_"_..~_~,,.w_w.__~_.___~_.~.'..,~.'__".W~"_~~.'_'" . . , . . . . . ..u"..,.'u...................,",.......,............................. '"'___,~_..__.~_,~~,~~~~~_~~___...w_w___~,~~_~~______"u~_~.y~...............I~_~__________._,_~_I~_I~j.:__~,_~_~__,,_u~~_.w,~,~_.__~_,_. ......................................................................................;...............................;;............j.....................................:................ .........)...........f....... ............................~.......... R Solorzano 5-16 01/1712007 Date Range Reported: Total Number of Collisions: City of Chula Vista Traffic Engineering Section Collision Report Summary 4/1/03 - 3/31/06 2 Report# Date Time Location Disl. Dlr. Type of Motor Veh. Dir. of Collision Involved With Travel 1 1784995 11/24/04 13:32 J Street & Hilltop Drive 18' West Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian West 2080355 6/8/05 15:37 J Street & Hilltop Drive 271' West Vehicle - Pedestrian Pedestrian UI I ~ ...... West Movement Oir. of Movement PCF Prec. Coli. 1 Travel 2 Prec. Coil. 2 Making Right South Entering Pedestrian Turn Traffic Violation Proceeding North Not Stated Pedestrian Straight Violation Page 1 Inj. Kil. Ver. o o Settings Used For Query Parameter Street Name Cross Street Starting Date Ending Date Distance from Intersection Involved With U1 I ~ co Settine. HILL TOP DRIVE JSTREET 04/0I/2003 03/3I/2006 >= 0' for non rear-end collisions >= 0' for rear-end collisions 'Pedestrian' City of Chula Vista Traffic Engineering Section 01/1712007 Date Range Reported: Total Number of Collisions: Collision Report Summary 4/1/03 - 3/31/06 2 1079596 10/22/03 18:25 Fourth Avenue & Anita 6' South Vehicle - Pedestrian Street Pedestrian South Page 1 Movement Oir. of Movement PCF Inj. Kil.Ver. Prec. Call. 1 Travel 2 Prec. Call. 2 Proceeding West Proceeding Traffic Signals 0 Straight Straight and Signs Proceeding North Other Pedestrian 0 Straight Violation Reporl# Date Time location Dis!. Oir. Type of Motor Veh. Dir. of Collision Involved With Travel1 2010463 4/7/05 14:25 Anita Street & Fourlh 528' East Vehicle - Pedestrian East Avenue Pedestrian (J1 I ~ <0 Settings Used For Query Parameter Street Name Cross Street Starting Date Ending Date Distance from Intersection Involved With CJ1 I N Cl Settin!! FOURTH AVENUE ANITA STREET 04/01/2003 03/31/2006 >= O. for non rear-end collisions >= 0' for rear-end collisions 'Pedestrian' ACTIVE PROJECT EXPENDITURES - BUDGET TO ACTUAL Fi~~~1 Year 2007 Month En!'ilng; ian, 2007 Sub Proi ect/Master 245632Si25 Audible Podslrn. (Traf):l~ Signa]} 2456328333 Audible !'edstrn (CDBGl 24563280 ,AUdible P.;dsirnSignal MOdllof P-H) Bli<h!et . . $50,000 $25,000 . $75,000 Control Budiiet .. $46,792 .. $604 . $47,396 Expenses M,T.D Expe!lses V-T.D 6& 68 .. Encllmb l, ..,.- - Avail.J!!~ Balance 47,328 CJ1 I N ~ '--"" L- '---' ACTIVE PROJECT EXPENDITURES - BUDGET TO ACTUAL Fis.;al Year 2007 Month Ending: Jan. 2007 Sub ProjectlMaster 2455323225 Upgra<]e Pedestr! (Trame Signal) 24SSj2JO...-~-Upgt:ad~:l!eliestri~.._.lAtfi'c~tial.~ P-T-D Bud~et $165,DOO $165,000 Coutrol Bud~et . $50,993 . $50,993 . E~penses M-T-D 4,267 Expe!lses Y-T-D 11.989 11 ,989 Encuirib 21,058 21,058 -rr-.S23 AVlIillIble BlIllInee 17,946 U1 I N N CITY OF CHULA VISTA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM DETAIL en I N W CIPNO: TF328 NEW CJP NO 24563280 INITIALLY SCHEDULED; 07/0112005 -~-----.--------"-- - '....u______ -.--- "-'-. "--~----' --------.--- ---- TITLE: Audihle Pedestrian Signal Modifications DEPARTMENT: Engineering --- u_.. - -.-- -~---~_.__. COMMUNITY PLAN AREA: Citywide PROJECT MANAGER: Frank Riveru PROJECT TOTAL COST ESTIMATES: APPROPRIA liONS FY 2006-07 FY 2007-08 FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 20010-11 TOTAL THRU 2005-06 1. Planning I Env. Review $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2. Land Acqulslllon $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 3. Design $5 000 $5 000 $0 $0 $0 $0 . ~() 4. Conslfuclion $70 000 $45,000 $25 000 ~O $0 $0 $0 TOTALS $75,000 S50,OOO $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 FINANCING SOURCES: COBG $25,000 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 . ___h_ SIGNAL $50,000 $25,000 $25,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTALS: $75,000 $50,000 $25,000 SO SO $0 $0 DESCRIPTION: Installation of audible pedestrian signal crossing 01 various sigariHzed inrerseclions wilhin Ihe City. VICINITY MAP: JUSTIFICATION: Audible signal will enhance the safelY of crossing pedestrians with sight disability. SCHEDULING: Insrallation to commence after design completion in FY 06. STATUS: In Design. BUDGET EFFECT: Minimlll. 123 CITY OF CHULA VISTA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM DETAIL CIPNO: TF] 2] NEW CIP NO 2455]2]0 INITIALLY SCHEDULED: 07/01/2004 --- .".-----_._---_.._--~- ---~- ___.n~__. ----..- --_._._-._--~._--- ---- TITLE: Upgradf: Pedestriafl Indications DEPARTMENT: Engineering ._'~---.- COMMUNITY PLAN AREA: Citywide PROJECT MANAGER: frank Rivera PROJECT TOTAL \ COST ESTIMATES: APPROPRIATIONS FY 2006-07 FY 2007-D8 FY 2008-09 FY 2009-10 FY 20010.11 TOTAL THRU 2005-06 1, Planning J Env. Review $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2. Land Acqulslllon $0 $0 $0 $0 SO $0 $0 3. Design $20 000 $10 000 SIO 000 SO $0 $0 SO 4. COllslrucllon S130 000 S90,OOO S40 000 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTALS $150,000 $100.000 $50,000 SO . $0 SO SO FJNANCING SOURCES: SIGNAL S\50,OOO J I -- J I SO I I I SIOO 000 S50,OOO SO $0 SO 1 $1311,000 f $jilil.ooO I I --.-- uT $0 I I $0 I TOTlUJl: $50,000 $0 $0 U1 \ DESCRIPTION: "" .po Upgrade of existing pedestrian indications to LED "countdown" indiCAtion at Vllrious siganllzed lnlcrsectlons within the City. Locations ofintersections to be upgraded are based on priority. which included signalized intersection's pedestrian volumes, accidents and signal proximity to the business areas, government facilities, schools and olher warranled criteria. JUSTIFICATION: CountdoWTI pedestrian indication will enhance the safelY of the pedestrian crossing a stfeer during the pedeslrian phase uflhe signal cycle. A countdown features additional information of the time left before the pedestrian phase fenninates. Thill' will provide additional clearance time information to help pedestrians decide whelher to slart the crossing or wait to the next "Walk" indication. SCHEDULING: Design and conslntclionJinstallation will be completed in FY 06/07. STATUS: On-going BUnGET EF=FECT: Annual operalional and maintenance costs are eslimaled 10 be $1,000 VICINITY MAP: \. 120 , , ~8IZI./1? I , . ~'" IltJi\" i . ;p: ..~p;; -0 ;:r'1J.) ,. "'C''5''."., ........ ~)'" ~#.Eq' . o ~:~~,::~'!ii~- -0 m ~",~..",Q -~---_.. ,.m II en Y,. --I \~~ ...~.'..-""'.'.' ---'\~P \ .,,"2: \ ~~\ "TI'" <J<~.'\.\ u\\\ .:..::..<"",\\' ...-ffl'> ...-;,..... .- ~ rtI \,:;-2 ,\ --l , \(J) i) il ,'j Applicant (Agency): City of Chula Vista Project Name: 12 Schools Pedestrian Improvements FY 2008 Pedestrian project Selection Criteria Matrix Category Criteria Potential Score Points 1. Community Support! Must have a\ least one of the following to Pass/Fail Consistency with qualify. Plea$e attach supporting Community Plan documentation. Pass 1. Resol~tion or minutes from City Counqil, County Board of Supervisors, local planning group, or Pla~ning Commission. Or 2. Projec~ is part of a Non-Motorized Plan that h~s been approved within the last five ars. 2. Minimum Design Standards Must meet t~e minimum geometric standards Pass/Fail set forth in the SANDAG Planninq and Desiqninq for Pedestrians manual and the Americans with Disabilities Act Design exceptions may be presented for consideration by the Bicycl~-Pedestrian Working Group with the understanding that initial project proposals must also in~lude a design that meets minimum standards. Pass 3. Connect to Regional Project is wit in 1/4 mile of a local transit stop or 10 Transportation Corridor/ regional transit station. Transit Linkage- 20 Points Maximum Project is witrin 600 feet of, and provides a 14 direct contin~ous connection to local transit sto . 14 Project is within 600 feet of, and provides a 20 direct contin~ous connection to regional transit station. ! 4. Completes Connection/ Completes or improves connection in existing 20 Linkage in Existing pedestrian nl9twork 20 Pedestrian Network - 5. Project Readiness * Projects are eligible for points following com letion of each hase. 20 Points Maximum Feasibility S udy 4 4 Prelimina n ineerin ** 4 4 Environmen I Clearance 4 4 Ri ht-of-wa !Ac uisition 4 4 Final Designi ** 4 6. Geographic Factors/ Factors contributing to score are: proximity to o to 20 GIS Analysis - population and employment, population and 20 Points Maximum employmentdensities, and activity centers. 5-27 Applicant (Agency): City of Chula Vista Project Name: 12 Schools Pedestrian Improvements FY 2008 Pedestrian Project Selection Criteria Matrix Category 7. Safety Improvements - 20 Points Maximum 8 Innovation and Design - 10 Points Maximum 9. Regional Housing Needs Incentive - 50 Points Maximum 10. Matching Funds 25 Points Maximum 11. Cost Benefit 15 Points Maximum Criteria Completes connection in existing network at location with documented safety or accident history. A. One to two correctable crashes involving non-motorized users within the last three ears. B. Three to four correctable crashes involving non-motorized users within the last three ears. C. Five to six correctable crashes involving non-motorized users within the last three ears. Pedestrian priority measures such as pedestrian controlled signals, bulb-outs, raised crosswalks, signal lead time, etc. A. Animated eye indicators, countdown pedestrian signal, accessible push- button si nal, flashin crosswalk B. Early pedestrian release interval, passive pedestrian detection, audible edestrian si nal C. Raised crosswalk, speed table, raised intersection, edestrian refu e island D. Pedestrian bulb-out, cul-de-sac con nectar Score is based on the number of affordable housing units provided by the jurisdiction as a portion of the cumulative total designated in their a roved housin element. Matching funds can be from any of the following sources: 1. Identified and approved capital funding from identified source. Please provide proof in the form of a resolution or letter of approval. 2. Approved match grant. 3. In-kind services. Please provide ade uate su ort documentation. Subtotal Score I Grant Application Amount Potential Points Subtotal o to 50 (Matching Funds) I (Project Cost) x 25 o to 15 Total Score * Previous project milestones must be met before qualifying for subsequent funding. ** Preliminary Engineering and Final Designs will be subject to design review by SANDAG. 5-28 Score 10 15 15 20 4 4 6 6 8 10 7 FY 2008 Annl/al Grant Application Transportation Development AcUtransNet Bicycle and Pedestrian Projects Applicant (Agency): Citv of Chula Vista Project Name: Bav Boulevard Bike Lane frort) F Street to J Street Application Amount: $54,520 Project Type: Bikewav Class 2 Project Limits: Bav Boulevard from F Street tl' J Street Project Description: The proposed proiect consists of installina 10,900 feet of class 2 bike lane on both sides of Bav Boulevard between F Strebt and J Street. This seament would provide a safer and more consistent facilitv for cvclists. Cllass 2 lanes are currentlv in place on the southern portion of this road. Summary of Cost Estimates: Cateaorv Feasibility Study Preliminary Engineering Environmental Design Construction Cost 1,000 Total Cost 22,000 115,575 $ 138,575 Funding Sources: Revenue Source TDAlTransNet Claim Amount paverrjent Rehabilitation Program FY06-d7 STL-316 (TransNet funds) Amount $54,520 $84,055 Total $138,575 1 5-29 Contact Person: Roberto Solorzano Title: Associate EnQineer Address 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista. California 91910 Phone: 619-409-5420 Fax: 619-691-5171 E-mail: solo@ci.chula-vista.ca.us Person Authorized to Submit Application: I certify that I have reviewed the Bicycle and Pedestrian Claims Guidelines and the information submitted in this application is accurate and in accordance with these guidelines. Elizabeth Chopp Senior Civil Engineer Name Title Signature Date 2 5-30 Proiect Fundinq: Total Estimated Project Cost (Please attach a detailed project estimate based on best available engllneering) $138.575 Revenues (Source and Amount): Matching Funds (Category 9 of Project Seledtion Criteria) Revenue Source Amount TransNet $84 055 Total $84.055 TDA/TransNet (Application Amount as shown in Category 10 of Project Selection Criteria) , I I $54.520 Total Revenues $138.575 Project Cost Estimates - On a separate sheet ~rovide an itemized cost estimate for all eligible expenses. Be as accurate as possible to avoid future cosl overruns. Projects with cost overruns have three options for moving the project forward depending on what percentage over the original grant amount the revised project cost will be. Applicants may ask for a recommendation from the BPWG to amend original allocation for up to five percent of the original cost estimate (up to the amount available in the reserve). Projects that require more than five percent additional funding can resubmit the project in a subsequent funding cycle with the adjusted project amount.. Lastly, the applicants can choose to complete the project with their own funding. Supportinq Materials I A. Communitv Support/Consistencv with ComrJT1unitv Plan (Cateoorv 1) - The councilor governing board of the appiicant must authorize this grant a~plication. Please attach a copy of the resolution or minute order documenting that action. Or, if the project is part of an approved Bicycle Plan, please attach a copy of the section that includes the project, This project is included as segment ei$ht in the approved Bicycle Master Plan, adopted by Council Resolution #2005-014 on January 25, 2005. Pages 9-7 and 10-5 attached. B. Minimum Desion Standards (Cateoorv 2) ,- Projects applying for construction funds must provide actual drawings or cross-sections from tre project itself, not generic standard drawings. If the applicant is seeking funding for the design and construction of a project, proposed cross-sections may be used in lieu of the actual plan drawings. If any part of a project is substandard, clearly illustrate that (provide photographs, if applicable) and provide an explanation as to why the minimum design standard is not being met. Attached 3 5-31 C. Connect to Reaional Transportation Corridor or Transit Linkaqe or Reqional Bikewav Map (Cateqorv ;D - Provide a map that clearly illustrates the projects relationship to existing facilities. Show the project's direct linkages to any regional bikeway (for bicycie projects) or direct continuous link to a local bus stop or direct link to an LRT/regional transit station. A direct link for a bicycle project is defined as connecting immediately to a regional bikeway with no gaps. A direct link between a pedestrian project and a transit facility is defined as one in which some part of the facility comes within 600 feet of a local bus stop or LRT/regional transit station. Class 2 lanes are currently in place on the southern portion of this road. The proposed project will be located within 450 ft of the H Street Trolley and Transit Station and within half a mile from the BayfrontlE Street Trolley Station. These stations serve Chula Vista Transit Routes 701, 702, 703, 704, 705, 706A, 707, 708, 709, and San Diego Metropolitan Transit System Route 932. See map attached D. Completes Connection/Linkaqe in Existlnq Blcvcle/Pedestrian Network ICateqorv 4) - List and briefly describe the linkages or connections to existing bicycle or pedestrian network. Provide a map that clearly illustrates the projects relationship to existing facilities. This segment would expand the City's bicycle facilities northward and provide a safer and more consistent ride for bicyclists. This project would connect to Class 2 lanes currently in place on the southern portion of this road and would close most of the existing gap in bicycle facilities between E Street and J Street. E. Proiect Readiness (Cateqorv 5) Phase Beain Comolete Feasibility Study Oct-2005 Oct-2005 Preliminary Engineering Aua-2006 Aua-2006 Environmental Document/Certification n/a n/a Finai Design Mar-2008 Aor-2008 Advertise for Construction Mav-2008 Mav-2008 Begin Construction Jul-2008 Jul-2008 Project Completion Seo-2008 F. Geoaraphic Factors/GIS Analvsis (Cateaorv 6) - SANDAG will perform a GIS analysis as described in the Bicycle and Pedestrian Claims Guidelines based upon a project map provided by the applicant. Briefiy describe project limits and provide a location map clearly showing the project alignment. In addition. clearly show and label the following elements: a. major traffic generators within the project area (within Y,-mile for pedestrian projects and within 1-mile for bicycle projects) b. linkage or connections to existing bicycle or pedestrian facilities c. linkage to any regional bikeway or public transit stop Attached 4 5-32 G. GeoGraphic Factors/GIS Analvsis (CateGory 6) - List and briefly describe major traffic generators served by the project. The proposed bike lane along Bay Boulevard is located within one mile of: Feaster Elementary School Vista Square Elementary School Chula Vista Middle School Chula Vista High School Mueller Elementary School Chula Vista Learning Community Ch;.rter Elementary Chula Vista Shopping Center . Transit Routes H Street Trolley Station BayfrontJE Street Trolley Station Pilgrim Evangelical Lutheran Church' I First Baptist Church Filipino & American Bible Baptist ChLrch First Free Will Baptist Church Church of God of Chula Vista Calvary Chapel Church of Christ South Bay Baptist Church World Harvest Church H. Safety Improvements (CateGorv 7) - Describe the safety issues addressed by the project. Please attach support documentation for safety an<!\ accident history. If collision data is provided, it must be specific in pointing out which collisions are applicable to the project and why it is relevant. The proposed project will increase the Uaffic safety of vehicles and bicycles at the proposed location. This project will enable bicyC;lists to stay within their own designated bike lane without having to go into vehicular lanes. There are no accidents reported for this location. I. Innovation and Desion (Cateoorv 8) - DesCl"ibe any design innovations for bicycie/pedestrian priority measures that are included within the projeot limits. Is this project in your agency's adopted capitai improvement program (Y/N) Y If the project is part of a larger capital improvef1!1ent project, briefly discuss how the bicycle or pedestrian project costs were identified and a description 01 the other sources of funds for the overall project. In order to cover the existing striping, this project is being included in the City's on going Pavement Rehabilitation Program STL-316. APproximately 5,450 centerline feet of Bay Boulevard will receive a rubberized slurry seal that 'will cover existing striping providing an excellent opportunity to stripe the road with the new bike lanes, symbols and legends. The Pavement Rehabilitation Program would pay for approl<imately 4,200 centerline feet of slurry seal, and TDA funds would pay for only 1,250 centerline feet of slurry seal. The pavement condition of this portion of the roadway is too good to normally warrant rehabilitation, and we would only be sealing it because of the bike lane project. Briefly describe any other aspects of the projecUhat is relevant to its evaluation. 5 5-33 The proposed project is included in the City of Chula Vista Bikeway Master Plan adopted by the City Council on January 25, 2005 per Council Resolution No. 2005-014. This segment would expand the City's bicycle facilities northward and provide a safer and more consistent ride for bicyclists. Class 2 lanes are currently in place on the southern portion of this road. Bicvcle Master Plans, Pedestrian Master Plans, Education/Safety Proqrams and Bicvcle Parkinq Bicycle Master Plans, Education/Safety Programs and Bicycle Parking' projects will each be considered in a separate category. These types of projects are encouraged and will be evaluated by SANDAG staff. Basic Guidelines Bicycle Master Plans - Cities with population up to 75,000 will be eligible for a maximum of $75,000. Cities with population greater than 75,000 will be eligible for a maximum of $150,000. Beginning with the 2008 project application cycle, all cities will need to have a SANDAG-approved Bicycle Plan to be eligible for TDAlTransNet funds for individual projects. Pedestrian Master Plans - An agency may submit an application for a pedestrian master plan no more frequently than once every five years. Jurisdictions with a population over 150,000 may submit applications for up to $150,000, and jurisdictions with a population under 150,000 may submit applications up to $100,000. In either case, the amount of the application must be substantiated by providing a scope of work and project budget to SANDAG. Education/Safety Programs - An agency must submit a scope of work and a proposed schedule to be evaluated by SANDAG staff. Bicycle Parking - Projects that conform to SANDAG's Bicycle Parking Guidelines and have a projected cost up to $50,000 will be eligible. All claims, including those supporting educational or promotional programs and claims for planning projects, must include a project budget, work program, and project schedule. 6 5-34 ~\.If? :;---:; ~---- on' GJ~ CHUlA V!SfA Ci~ of Chula Vista ENGINfERtNG DEPARTMENT tnfj-astructure Planning Date Prepared By: Checked By: 3-Jan-07 Roberta Solorzano B. Chapp Project Number: STL-316 Bay Boulevard Bike Lanes - from F Street to J Street Project Title: Application of rubberized slurry seal, center line striping, bike Description: lane striping, bike signs, symbols and legends. Application of slurry seal would eliminate existing striping (double yellow painted median). Item Quantity Unit Unit Price -~- N;;!eli,ls~~~I 1 ,REAS (Pavern_entR eha~lilt~~~~2.._._....1~~9go SF...~925.._$!1!5.QQ,Q9 ............i[~EA~(~g!<Lm.......m.m...mmm.......... .............. _.5..?QQ.0_mj....~f..".......J.0:2.5.L ..m.Jgg90Q.9.. 3' Bi.k.".I"~,,,,~I~i~~(!~II:) .m.......... ....~9~9g......~.............J.2:gg.' .mm...m ..mE1,89g9g 4 g ( ) 8...Y:'...........J.1.2?:9.9.' $1,000.0 .............5.1.::~:.;;~;e;;;:,,~d-"J~~~i~;;i(r.~~L:[[[[~:[:[:::::'[:::I:::...l..~f.+...Jl.!99Q,QO '=:[=["'.[.'.:.:..'$'.:.:.~1.'.'oi.~.',:'.09'.:.00:.[..Oo:.:.~..OO:.:.OOO.[.'.: 6:C~nterfine striping_and raisedmar~~_~_~_._..~.m_._ 545q,....OM.>. SF ..l?~.QQ..L ....m.....'....'....-. _ ___ _ ___ m.jl~~'1~~i~il~~e~d~::~~~~(~!?p.:~~)................ .mm?gg.m....mm~r.. ..mmmm.. m~?:?g..j. ........ ..mmJ5.gggo .8P"~"I71~~~le~"n~"!~"rl71o.~la"ti~(lil71itli~e,,:..~~ro,,,s) 550 LS m...m..........~.~.gg : .. m.m..m...m.m.g~og99. . 9~ub~c..canvenience.an~"a!ety(T~affic..cantrol). 1.................. ......F,tiQOO{) ..J?,5.QOOO 10' .......___...._."~M~_.._ 11 12 tDA ELIGIBLE I ......m..1.~ . .m.....mm...................... ................................. ......~~~o20 .m....... .....m...mm....... 14 Pavelilent-Re_habiUtati()n:(tran~Net);'; _. i: 1 5'.""" ......._..................,....$81l::ii5~ ................................................. ...'.............,..... ,W.WN, .'.'.'..._.'...'.'.'._.w_.'...'.'.w....'."....,.', .._.:.'.:--.:.';...:...;.,~_.:.:.;...:.,.,.,.:.'<.,<<.:_..,...:"',.".,.:".<" ":"""...,...:...,-1;"""""",<,,, "Yo'''' ........._..w...-j...._w. _._..._'....'.'. 16 $138,,75.. .... ................._~ 170 181 .1.9'. 20' 21' ................................... 22 ........................... .m......................................... ..... ....~.3.;............... .........._.................................................._.......i..............................!.............;.................... .................. 24 .-..........,....,.--......-................,.--,.--... 20' ...........~~U.......... m...m..m.m.mm........ ...mm....m.. 27; . . ...._.-.._...~---. 28 , : ..'.m..'.'..'.w~.".-'-..'..._w ..... jw...._ . . ....m....'.m......:...............................,... ........,-~..._-_._._._-<- ..._.....~w...,...._.;. 115,575.00 TOTAL COST OF PROJECT $ 138,575.00 5-35 Bay Boulevard looking north Bay Boulevard looking south ~I!?- ';i~-~ "''''' CJ-UA VNA NO SCALE F.R. R/ft LINE: /ft , 4/1' I R[ SIJC1tIl.K~T F 25'/30' --: 30' I 18' I! I ~K III BE Lflfi "'''' I I I mm"""""" l I I '..H ~~-=--~:t_-- TYFI9--AL S:gCTJON STA. 4.32+10 TO STA. 4.39+75 R/< F. R. R;W I LINE: I , vARIC'S -L 18,----4 ~~S I : ! Ii!.. V.)." ;~.. - -. I . ~- ~___ ____ . ------1 TYPICAL S;8CTIQN STA. 424"'r34 TO STA. 426+ 15 NO SCALE F.R. UNE: R(' 4e' I Rf" ~-----*--~- . ~ L:J-L------1-- TYPIC.f;.L SECTION STA.417+3.... TQ STA....l1+S.. (RT. SIDE) STA.411+64 Ta> STA.424+.J4 (L T. &: RT. SIDE) STA. 427+.3.... Tb STA. 432+ 70 (LT. & RT. SIDE) STA.4..J9+7S rp STA,440+66.5 (RT.SIDE) Bay Boulevard from F Street to J Street ROADWAY CROSS-SECTIONS 5-37 ACfIVJ<; PROJi<;CT J<;XPJi:NDlTURJ<;S - HUDfJJ<;T TU ACTUAL Fiscal Year ;Z007 Month Ending: Jan. 2007 ,ob Protect/Master 24173i6217 Pavemeot Rellab 0 (Traos.Sales Tax) 24173160.. Pavemelll Reh~b 06.07 P.T.D Budj!et $2,100,000 Control Blldj!et $2,100,000 . $2,100,000 $2,100,000 ,"xpenses ~ Expenses Y-T-D ,Available Encomb Balance . 2,100,000 2,100,000 01 I (oJ co CITY OF CHULA VISTA CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM DETAIL CIP NO: ...__._--,~TL3I!.._______'!.~W ~P NO ... .u. .24IJ}L"-~___ __....IN..'-I-'-ALL y 5C.f1E:O~JL!,~__. 0)/0112006 TITLE: Pavement Rchabililation 06 - 01 DEPARTMENT: General Services .-- COMMUNITY PLAN AREA: Citywide PROJECT MANAGER: Rubertu YanolJeff Moneda PROJECT TOTAL COST ESTIMATES: APPROPRIATIONS FY 200Q-07 FY 2007~O6 FY 2000-09 FY 2009-10 FY 20010-11 TOTAL TURU 2005-08 1. Planning I Env. Review $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 2. Land Acqui,iIIun $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 3. Design $100000 $0 $200,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 4. Conslfuciion $1 900,000 $0 $1 900,000 $0 $0 $0 $0 TOTALS $1,\ 00,000 $0 $1,100,000 SO So $0 $0 FINANCING SOURCES: TRANSNET I $2,100,000 I SO I I $2,100,000 I .$0 I $0 I $0_1 _ u $0 - TOTALS: I $2,106,006 I $6 I I .$1,100,000 I $6 I $0 I $6 I $0 I wOESCRIPTION: <0 This project consists of AC overlays, chip sea.ls and slurry selll rehabilitation strategies to rehabilitate deteriorating pavement throughout the City. JUSTIFICATION: Rehabilit8tion of existing streer pavement ill necessary 10 cost effectively eXlend its life and avoid further lh:leriorating of the pavemenf and base IIllllerial. SCHEDULING: On going, STATUS: Thhi is an annual program anti will encompass those streels identified utilizing the Cily's pavement managemcu. system for FY 06/D1. BUDGET EFFECT: None. VICINITY MAP: Chula Vista Bikeway Master Plan Update - 2005 9.3.3 East J Street between Paseo Ladera and Paseo Ranchero (Segment 6) This is a Class 3 section of East J Street which is a Class 2 facility west of this location. Up- grading this section to a Class 2 facility would make this a more consistent facility. 9.3.4 Otay Lakes Road between East H Street and Apache Drive (Segment 7) This is a Class 3 section of Otay Lakes Road adjacent to Southwestern College. It is a Class 2 facility north and south of this location. Upgrading this section to a Class 2 facility would make this more consistent with the remainder of local roadway conditions and better serve a potentially significant trip destination. 9.3.5 Bay Boulevard between F Street and J Street (Segment 8) This is an undesignated section of Bay Bou- levard which is otherwise designated as a Class 2 facility. There is sufficient paving width to fully stripe the roadway with a Class 2 bikeway facility. 9.3.6 Orange Avenue between Palomar Street and Hilltop Drive (Segment 9) Orange Avenue between Palomar Street and Hilltop Drive accesses the South Chula Vista Library. Orange Avenue/Olympic Parkway is Class 2 throughout most of its length except for this section (and Segment 14). Continuing Class 21ane striping would give cyclists more visibility on a more consistent facility. 9.3.7 Otay Lakes Road (northbound) be- tween East H Street and Ridgeback Drive (Segment 10) Otay Lakes Road has Class 2 lanes along its entire length except for the east side of this section (and Segment 7 near Southwestern College). Continuing Class 2 lane striping would give cyclists more visibility on a more consistent facility. City Council Resolution 2005-014 9.3.8 Sandpiper Way between Marina Park- way and G Street (Segment 11) This existing Class 3 segment lies in the midst of what is otherwise a Class 2 bikeway facility. It will be part of the planned Bayshore Bikeway route and falls within Port District tidelands jurisdiction. Continuing Class 2 lane striping would provide cyclists a consistent facility through this popu- . lar area. Implementation as a Class 2 may rely on removing on-street parking, and this is a distinct possibility since the Port District is encouraging off-street parking as planned redevelopment occurs in this area. This seg- ment refiects the revised routing planned for Marina Parkway by the Port District. 9.3.9 Main Street between Industrial Boule- vard and Frontage Road west of Interstate 5 (Segment 12) This segment would connect the proposed Segment 5 on Industrial Boulevard to the Bay Boulevard and the Bayshore Bikeway. Due to existing curb widths, an interim Class 3 bike route will be provided. Most of the northern portion of this project lies within the City of San Diego city limits, but provides connectivity to Chula Vista. Bay Boulevard: Completing Class 2/ane striping is recommended Page 9-7 5-40 Chula Vista Bikeway Master Plan Update - 2005 13 14 15 16 17 18 Notes: 1,320 0.25 Bayshore Bikeway between E $187,978 Completion of Bayshore Bikeway Street and F Street 5,821 1.10 Utility easement between Max $305,537 Consult SDG&E Avenue and Second Avenue 2,640 0.50 East H Street between Buena $1,040,899 Dual Class 1 paths Vista Way and Otsy Lakes Rd 9,781 1.85 $1,534,414 14,400 2.73 Main Street between Industrial $3,221 Interim Class 3 Boulevard and 1-8i05 (Class 2 cost not included) 7,890 1.49 Industrial Boulevard between L $2,315,499 Interim Class 3 (Class 2 cost included) and Main Streets 3,700 0.70 East J St. between River Ash $43,818 Fills gap in Class 2 facility Dr. and Paseo Ranchero 3.400 0.64 Otay Lakes Rd, bf!tween East $14,786 Fills gap in Class 2 facility H St. and Apache: Dr. 5,280 1.00 Bay Boulevard beltween F and $58,560 Fills gap in Class 2 facility J Streets 8,263 1.56 Orange Ave. benMeen Palomar $239,710 Interim Class 3 (Class 2 cost included) Street and Hilltop 'Drive 1,600 0.30 Otay Lakes Rd. between East $3,514 Completes northbound Class 2 H St. and Ridgebalck Or. 2,350 0.45 Sandpiper Way between $10,065 Revised Class 2 to reflect closure of Marina Parkway and G Street Marina Parkway (Consult Port District) 2,037 0.39 Main St. between Frontage Rd, $11,313 Partly within San Diego (over 1-5) and Industrial Blvq:l. 48,920 9.27 2,700,486 1,000 0.19 Auto Park Way b~tween 1-805 $586 East-west connector and Oleander Av~nue East Orange Ave./Olympic 1,909 0.36 Pkwy. from Melro$e Avenue to Funded Part of Caltrans project (over \-805) Oleander Avenue 1,320 0.25 Telegraph Cyn. Rd. between $878 East-west connector (under 1-805) Nadon Ave. and lHalecrest Dr. 3,753 0.71 East H St. between Claire Ave. $1,757 Partly within County (over 1-805) and Hidden Vista Drive 0.99 Gotham Street beft\Neen Otay $1,757 East-west connector 5,246 Lakes Road and Chateau Ct. (Wall cutting not included) 1,600 0.30 East J St between Paseo $13,800 Class 3 conversion from Class 2 Ranchero ad Carn. Calabaza 14,828 2.81 18,778 Total: $4,253,678 See Appendix E for more detailed cost information for each segment. Page 10-5 City Council Resolution 2005-014 5-41 00 n : <<< ~ ~81'~1 : w N ~ ~ sillIlY!" . Ul ~ ~ II ~ I Of, o () ~ Ul < -; m (f) ;0 '0 IO 000 ' r C ~ ::g hi en ^ Z -< (f) m G) en--l r () ~ 0 )::> -f -f u Z ;0 - Ul 1m 0 Ul z I I I \~ \\' \\ '''-~\ ~..\""", "'" ,'1l -< " --~::: '0 CO,.,. 'g, i.. ~\ ..(;:..: "Z "" I ~~~a' ,'~",.', ,-< OJ, cr~;s ::c::' r ";" "m:::: < "?&":':: 0" ',OJ'''' ';;<; ,Ill];" .-r'" :l>\ I' Z\' m\ i . . I , ,I , Applicant (Agency): City of Chula Vista Project Name: Bay Boulevard Bike Lanes from F Street to J Street FY 2008 Bicycle Prfiect Selection Criteria Matrix Category Criteria Potential Score Points 1. Community Support! Must have a least one of the following to Pass/Fail Consistency with qualify. Plea$e attach supporting Community Plan documentation. Pass 1. Resol~tion or minutes from City Council, County Board of Supelitisors, local planning group, or Planning Commission. Or 2. Projeqt is part of a Bicycle Plan that has b~en approved within the last five years. 2. Minimum Design Standards Must meet t, e minimum geometric standards Pass/F ail set forth in t~e Caltrans Highway Design manual. Design exceptions may be presented for consider$tion by the Bicycle-Pedestrian Working Group with the understanding that initial project proposals must also include a design that meets minimum standards. , Pass 3. Connect to Regional Project is a art of, or connects to, a regional 10 Transportation Corridor or bikeway corMor as identified in the Regional Transit Linkage or Regional Transportati~n Plan (RTP) . Bikeway Map - 10 20 Points Maximum Project provides a direct connection to local 14 transit sto .: 14 Project provides a direct connection to 20 regional tran!sit station. (LRT, Transit Center) 20 4. Completes Connectionl Provides se ment of an identified and 4 Linkage in Existing approved bi<l: c1e facility. 4 Bicycle Network - Completes donnection in existing network or 20 20 Points Maximum upgrades e~isting facility. 20 5. Project Readiness' Projects are:eligible for points following completion f each phase. 20 Points Maximum Feasibility S ud 4 4 Prelimina n ineerin .. 4 4 Environmen al Clearance 4 4 Ri ht-of-wa' Ac uisition 4 4 Final Desig~ .. 4 6. Geographic Factorsl Factors con ributing to score are: proximity to o to 20 GIS Analysis - population a!nd employment, population and 20 Points Maximum employment densities, and activity centers. 5-43 Applicant (Agency): City of Chula Vista Project Name: Bay Boulevard Bike Lanes from F Street to J Street FY 2008 Bicycle Project Selection Criteria Matrix Category Criteria Potential Score Points 7. Safety Improvements - Completes connection in existing network at location with documented safety or accident history. 20 Points Maximum A. One to two correctable crashes 10 involving non-motorized users within the last three years. B. Three to four correctable crashes 15 involving non-motorized users within the last three ears. C. Five or more correctable crashes 20 involving non-motorized users within the last three ears. 8. Innovation and Design - Bicycle priority measures. Dedicated bicycle 10 10 Points Maximum signal heads, queue jumpers, bike box, colored lanes, cul-de-sac connector, bike boulevard, and bike station. Subtotal 9. Regional Housing Score is based on the number of affordable o to 50 Needs Incentive - housing units provided by the jurisdiction as a 50 Points Maximum portion of the cumulative total designated in their approved housing element. 10. Matching Funds - Matching funds can be from any of the (Matching 25 Points Maximum following sources: Funds)! 15 1. Identified and approved capital (Project funding from identified source. Cost) x 25 Please provide proof in the form of a resolution or letter of approval. 2. Approved match grant. 3. In-kind services. Please provide ade uate su ort documentation. 11. Cost Benefit - Subtotal Score! Grant Application Amount o to 15 15 Points Maximum Total Score . Previous project milestones must be met before qualifying for subsequent funding. .. Preliminary Engineering and Final Designs will be subject to design review by SANDAG. 5-44 RESOLUTION NO. 2007- RESOLUTION OF THE C!TY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE SUBMITTAL OF THREE GRANT APPLICATIONS TO THE SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERJ."IMENTS (SANDAG) FOR FISCAL YEAR 2007/2008 TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT (TDA) AND TRANS NET FUNDING FOR BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN PROJECTS WHEREAS, on an annual basis fUI)ds are available for bicycle and pedestrian projects from the State Transportation Development Act (TDA) and the regional Transportation Sales Tax (TransNet), both of which are administered regionally through the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG); and WHEREAS, the City annually partiqipates in the competitive process to obtain TDA and TransNet bicycle and pedestrian project funds by submitting an updated list of projects to SANDAG; and WHEREAS, SANDAG regulations, require that official applications be submitted to SANDAG in order for projects to be consid~red by its Board of Directors for funding; and WHEREAS, in order for the application to be official, the City Council must approve a resolution authorizing submittal of the Fiscal Year 2007/2008 project applications; and WHEREAS, for Fiscal Year 2007/2008, the City is requesting funds for the following projects: I. 2. 3. Bayshore Bikeway Alignment Study Bay Boulevard Bike Lane between F Street and J Street Pedestrian Traffic Signal Upgrade WHEREAS, these three projects were ,selected because they closely follow the eligibility guidelines for TDA and TransNet funding; and NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOL Vf:D that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista approves the submittal of three grant applications to the San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) for Fiscal Year 2007/2008 Transportation Development Act and TransNet funding for bicycle and pedestrian capital improvemtnts'o Presented by Approved as to form by Scott Tulloch City Engineer .J1 /1 ~ '''-r..-)!./--=-C'o... {( - -' v~~'\.J Ann Moore City Attorney H:\ENGINEER\RESOS\RESOS2007\Ol-23-07\RESO FOR SUBMffiAl Of TDA APPLICATION.DOC 5-45 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ~~ em OF -<; < -<O~ CHULA VISTA 01/23/2007 Item~ SUBMITTED BY: REVIEWED BY: RESOLUTION ADDING ONE LATENT PRINT EXAMINER TO THE AUTHORIZED STAFFING LEVEL OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, AMENDING THE FY 2006/2007 POLICE DEPARTMENT BUDGET AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS BASED UPON UNANTICIPATED REVENUES. CHIEF OF POLICE ~ t=:"... /Z..P5 CITY MANAGER . <!i 'J 4/5THS VOTE: YES X NO ITEM TITLE: BACKGROUND The State of California Department of Justice maintains an automated system for retaining and identifying fingerprints, palm prints and photos called the California Identification System and Cal-Photo (hereinafter referred to as "Cal-ID"). The California Penal Code, Section 11112.1 provides for the establishment of a Remote Access Network ("RAN"), consisting of a statewide network of equipment and procedures allowing local law enforcement agencies direct access to Cal-ID. The San Diego County Sheriffs Department is the County's proprietary agency for San Diego County's Cal-ID/RAN. California Vehicle Code Section 9250.19 allocates money to the Cal-ID/RAN program to "enhance the capacity of local law enforcement to provide automated mobile and fixed location fingerprint identification". This Vehicle Code section is in effect until January 1, 2012, or until that date is repealed. The Chula Vista Police Department Crime Laboratory is currently staffed with two full time latent print examiners. The relatively new Police facility (2004) includes a spacious and modern laboratory, and was designed to meet the future needs of the community. The laboratory has one NEC (Nippon Electronic Corporation) Automated Fingerprint Identification System (AFIS) that is connected to the local, state, and federal database. Additionally, in mid 2006 the laboratory acquired a Cal-ID/RAN funded stand-alone AFIS system, called AFIX Tracker. This smaller system is for the storage oflocal prints, and is used as a tool by the latent print examiners for helping identify suspects based upon finger and palm prints left at crime scenes. 6-1 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Not Applicable 01/2312007, Ite~ Page 2 of3 RECOMMENDATION That Council adopts the resolution adding one latent print examiner to the authorized staffing level of the Police Department, amending the FY 2006/2007 Police Department budget and appropriating $22,802 to personnel services, $6,300 to supplies and services, and $63,000 to the capital budget based upon unanticipated revenues. BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Not Applicable DISCUSSION The County of San Diego Sheriff s Department provides two main regional services that relate to the Cal- ID system. One of those services, fingerprint verification, is provided to Carlsbad, Escondido, Oceanside, and El Cajon. The other main service is identification entry into the CaI-ID system. The Sheriffs Department currently provides both fmgerprint verification and identification entry services to La Mesa, Coronado, and National City. Understandably, the time consuming verification of latent prints and identification entry for the region has a significant impact on the Sheriffs tremendous workload. Fingerprint verification and entries into the Cal-ID system are a high priority for law enforcement agencies because it involves confirmation of identifications, which is a critical component of investigation cases. Due to the multiple regional services provided by the Sheriffs Department, along with an increased caseload, a regional backlog exists for identification entry into the Cal- ID system and fingerprint verification. The Sheriff s Department was looking at a multi-level approach to address this growing backlog of Cal-ID cases. One part of the solution is to partner with the Chula Vista Police Department to verify prints on a regional basis. The Police Department proposes to add one Latent Print Examiner to the authorized staffing level of the Department. This new position would provide latent print services on a regional basis and would be completely funded by the County's CaI-ID/RAN program. This position would be responsible for the entry of Chula Vista Cal-ID cases and comparison work at the Chula Vista Police Department on a regular basis. In addition, the Latent Print Examiner would handle the verification of prints for the El Cajon Police Department, and potentially in the future, the National City Police Department, the La Mesa Police Department, and the Coronado Police Department. This position may also conduct National City Police Department's Cal-ID entries and the resultant examinations until that agency is equipped and staffed to perform its own CaI- ID entries. Additionally, the Latent Print Examiner would conduct regular Cal-ID fingerprint training for law enforcement officers throughout the San Diego region, which is currently done by the Sheriffs Cal-ID Administrator. 6-2 01/23/2007, Item /., Page 3 of3 The Sheriffs Department will continue to offer fingerprint verification services for Carlsbad, Escondido, and Oceanside, along with Cal-ID entry for La Mesa and Coronado. This Latent Print Examiner position is a partnership between the Sheriff s Department and the Chula Vista Police Department for regional latent needs, but the position would also facilitate the growing needs of the Chula Vista Crime Laboratory Latent Print Section. This position with regional responsibilities will continue to exist as long as the Cal- ID/RAN program funds it. DECISION MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site specific and consequently the 500 foot rule found in California Code of Regulations section 18704.2(a)(1) is not applicable to this decision. FISCAL IMPACT Approval of this resolution will result in the addition of one Latent Print Examiner to the Police Department, appropriating $22,802 to the FY 2006/2007 personnel services budget based on a April 13, 2007 hire date, $6,300 to the supplies and services budget for associated one-time costs of a computer/monitor, software, scanner, microscope and office supplies, and $63,000 to the capital budget for a one-time cost of a Cal-ID workstation. The funding that the County's Cal-ID/RAN program receives from fingerprint identification fees (California Vehicle Code Section 9250.19) will completely offset these costs. Consequently, there is no net fiscal impact to the General Fund. ATTACHMENTS None. Prepared by: Jonathan Alegre, Senior Management Analyst, Police Department 6-3 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ADDING ONE LATENT PRINT EXAMINER TO THE AUTHORIZED STAFFING LEVEL OF THE POLICE DEPARTMENT, AMENDING THE FY 2006/2007 POLICE DEPARTMENT BUDGET AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS BASED UPON UNANTICIPATED REVENUES. WHEREAS, the State of California Department of Justice maintains an automated system for retaining and identifying fingerprints, palm prints and photos called the California Identification System and Cal-Photo (hereinafter referred to as "Cal-ID"); and WHEREAS, due to the multiple regional services provided by the San Diego Sheriffs Department, along with an increased caseload, a regional backlog exists for identification entry into the Cal-ID system and fingerprint verification; and WHEREAS, the Police Department proposes to add one Latent Print Examiner position to its authorized staffing level to address the regional Cal-ID backlog; and WHEREAS, this new position would provide latent print services on a regional basis and would be completely funded by the San Diego County's Cal- ID Remote Access Network program. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby add one latent print examiner to the authorized staffing level of the Police Department, amend the FY 2006/2007 Police Department budget and appropriate funds based upon unanticipated revenues. prellnte.d by: Y!)J Richard P. Emerson Police Chief Approved as to form by: 6-4 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT .:S-'Yf::. (llY OF ,,-<:='~ CHUlA VISTA January 23, 2007, Item~ ITEM TITLE: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING FEDERAL FUNDING REQUESTS FOR SUBMISSION ../ ASSISTANT CITY ~AGE~ CITY MANAGER r; I SUBMITTED BY: REVIEWED BY: 4/5THS VOTE: YES D NO [!] BACKGROUND The City of Chula Vista has, for many years, worked cooperatively and effectively with its Congressional representative on issues concerning this community. Among the ways we have benefited from this effort is through Federal funds to support projects and programs that the City Council has endorsed. This includes $22 million for the Chula Vista Veteran's Home, $5 million for Olympic Parkway, $2.7 million for work at H Street and 1-5 and $2.8 million for Heritage Bridge. As the 110lh Congress convenes, Chula Vista has prepared a list of projects for submittal in 2007. Attachment A was submitted to the City Council for review and comment in an Information Item on December 14,2006. As of January 16,2007, no comments had been received. The list is brought to you now for formal approval. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is not a "Project" as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is necessary. RECOMMENDATION Council approve the Resolution BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Not Applicable 7-1 January 23,2007, Item-L Page 2 of2 DISCUSSION Department heads and other key city staff members have developed a package of proposed City projects for which Federal funding assistance may be available in the 2007 legislative session. Brief descriptions of the listed projects are attached. There have been two informal meetings about these proposals with Chula Vista's Congressional representative, Bob Filner, as well as follow-up conversations with members of his staff here in Chula Vista and in Washington, D.C. While there are no guarantees that funding will be received for any of these projects, we have been encouraged to submit formal requests to the Congressman's office and to work with him to determine what opportunities may be available to the City. With Council approval, staff will begin that effort and provide updated information to the Council as it becomes available. DECISION MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated and determined that some of the proposed funding requests are not site specific, and consequently the 500- foot rule found in California Code of Regulations section I 8704.2(a)(l) is not applicable to those funding requests. For those funding requests that are site specific, staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council and has found no property holdings within 500 feet of the boundaries of the properties which are the subject of this action. FISCAL IMPACT There is no direct fiscal impact associated ~th passing the Resolution. Should the City succeed in obtaining funds for one or more of the projects submitted with this report, city staff will return to Council with a more detailed proposal and scope of work. ATTACHMENTS A. Project Descriptions Prepared by: Colleen M Carnevale, Communications Manager, Office of the City Manager 7-2 January 23, 2007, Item~ Attachment A Alternative Fuels Pilot Project $750,000 The City proposes taking the next important step in becoming a national showcase for finding and demonstrating practical sustainable energy alternatives by moving two alternative fuels beyond the "experimental" to the practical and accessible. Chula Vista would convert two of its CNG fuel buses to HCNG fuel use. A successful pilot could lead the City to convert it's entire fleet ofCNG buses to cleaner burning HCNG(80% CNG enriched with 20% hydrogen). The resulting mix is cleaner than CNG, with 50% fewer nitrous oxide emissions at little or no additional cost. HCNG is the next generation of low-emission fuels and one alternative that has significant promise. The project would also offer the only public dispenser of CNG in the South Bay Region to keep pace with growing demand by truck fleets and private passenger vehicle owners. The next nearby source is in the City Heights area of San Diego (15 miles away). CNG itself provides a significant reduction in polluting emissions when compared to diesel fuel or gasoline. As a result of Chula Vista's participation in prior demonstration projects, the City already owns almost all of the equipment required to produce and deliver HCNG and CNG fuels. Our existing hydrogen electrolyzer, which is the largest in California, was purchased as part of a recent Federal demonstration program funded by the Department of Transportation, the Department of Energy, the California Energy Commission and the City of Chula Vista. This is a very high production electrolyzer, generating as much hydrogen in one hour as many stations generate in a day. To fully utilize the $1 million investment in this equipment, the City plans to produce hydrogen for the HCNG bus demonstration and eventually for the fleet. Chula Vista also owns a CNG compressor station, currently used to dispense CNG to City buses. To combine the hydrogen and CNG into HCNG for the bus demonstration, and to dispense CNG to the public, the project site only requires fuel lines, storage capacity, and a new mixer/dispenser that is weights-and-measures certified for use in private vehicles. $750,000 would purchase the station equipment necessary to transfer, mix, store and dispense the two fuels for this region wide alternative fuels demonstration. There will be a cost to the public for purchase of CNG fuel at the site, as with any other fueling station. The cost would vary with CNG market fluctuations, but in general would be roughly equal to the prevailing cost in Southern California. Cost components would include the City's fuel purchase price plus a small increment to cover City costs for maintenance, delivery, and program administration including bank costs. The City is in the process of completing a bank agreement to accept credit cards. Bank charges will be recouped from the fuel charge. There is already a demand for CNG fuel by the public, but to heighten public awareness about the Chula Vista station, $15,000 in public outreach costs has been factored into the appropriation request. The station would also be listed on Internet natural gas fueling maps for travelers including Clean Car Maps, the California Natural Gas Vehicle Coalition map, and possibly the SDG&E map. . 1-3 Page I January 23, 2007, Item q- Attachment A Hi-National University Park & Research Center Master Plan $3 - 5 Million The Master Plan project will develop an organizational and funding structure for the creation and operation of the campus for the region's first bi-national university; prepare the detailed planning, infrastructure and environmental documents for the campus; and provide an initial capital fund to seed philanthropic support for the construction of campus buildings. A U.S. - Mexico consortium of colleges and universities has developed a prospectus for a bi- national University Park and Research Center on a 450 acre site centered between downtown San Diego and downtown Tij uana - an international metropolitan area of more than 6 million people that includes the busiest land border crossing in the world. With a focus on international issues related to trade, transportation, economic development, energy, security and the environment - the University Park and Research Center campus will become a center for the analyzing and addressing shared challenges in the countries' border regIOns. The campus will provide higher education opportunities in a traditionally underserved area of the region, help to address a significant jobslhousing imbalance, and provide a major forum for the exchange of ideas and solutions for students, faculty, and local, state and federal officials from. the U.S. and Mexico. The City ofChula Vista has provided more than $1.2 million in initial funding and will donate the site for the campus. 1-q Page 2 January 23,2007, Iteml Attachment A Community Safety and Communication System $5 - 6 Million A comprehensive wired and wireless safety communications system that could serve as the backbone of an improved regional interagency communication system. It could also stabilize future public agency communication costs and provide free WiFi-WiMax services for the public. The project would build on the City's hard wired system that has begun to connect major public facilities and complement that system with a compatible wireless system that uses free public airwaves to interconnect mobile safety vehicles, personnel and critical infrastructure such as traffic lights and emergency operation centers. Having control of the system infrastructure, intellectual property and airwaves required to run the system would allow Chula Vista to stabilize future costs, establish and maintain emergency priorities and establish a model that will enhance interagency communication. Tbe WiFi- WiMax backbone for safety communications can also stabilize costs for other public service field personnel, replace City broadband capacity and be expanded to provide a free public wireless business model that also enhances local government public education capacity. The proposed project would: . Fund fiber infrastructure to connect the Police Department, Emergency Operations Center, Fire Administration, Fire Stations, Dispatch, traffic signals and other key emergency servIces, . Simultaneously create fiber backbone to reduce costs for connecting the rest of the City facilities, and provide a back up to emergency communications, . Have the capacity to provide some access to agencies with overlapping jurisdiction and further demonstrate the system's interagency communication and financial effectiveness, . Have the potential to replace the current broadband support losses in 2009 from state cable franchises and, stabilize or eliminate the City's future landline, intemetlintranet and related communication operating costs, . Fund Wireless- WiFi - WiMax backbone to provide stable, reduced cost mobile safety service, . Provide Chula Vista/South Bay with a competitive edge in the WiFi/WiMax development market in San Diego and catch up with North County San Diego and others that have established or are exploring free and low cost WiFi business models, . Fund video production capacity to initially target safety communication messages and ultimately expand Chula Vista and South Bay's public communication outreach and marketing capacity (public and cable franchise video production has often been shared regionally, Chula Vista has never had the benefit of being the host). . Attract complementary funding to enhance public services and free communication access, . Complement Chula Vista's developing education, research and commercial infrastructure with broadly available state of the art communications, . Develop a model to invest in all of the above in a manner that reduces existing general fund costs to participating local agencies, stabilizes future costs and expands the City's open, transparent and inclusive public participation and emergency service programs. 1-5 Page 3 January 23, 2007, Item~ Attachment A Installation of Permanent Domestic Water Line & Resurfacing of Access Road Serving the Chnla Vista Nature Center $460,660 The former underground domestic water line had to be abandoned due to significant settling of the levy road that is used to access the Nature Center and Sweetwater Marsh National Wildlife Refuge. The road has been shored and patched, and a temporary potable water line has been installed above ground. This temporary line is providing critical service for maintaining plant and animal collections, and is providing water for restrooms, drinking fountains, and other sanitary needs. The road is federally-owned; the City utilizes an easement. This is the only access route to the National Wildlife Refuge Field Office and to the Nature Center for environmental education and conservation uses. The road was originally constructed by the Army Corps of Engineers but is now maintained by the City. Project would include underground installation of a new water line and resurfacing of the road. Cost estimate: $460,660 (includes contingencies, per General Services) 7-& Page 4 January 23,2007, Iteml Attachment A Missing Infrastructure/ School Zone Traffic and Pedestrian Safety $132,000,000 2,300,000 The City's existing and planned transportation facilities vary dramatically in condition and availability from the newly developing areas of the City to the older aging pre-smart growth neighborhoods. The City Council frequently receives competing requests from the public for local infrastructure improvements. An overwhelming proportion of citizen requests directly correlate with the City Council's desire to ensure safe routes to schools. Public infrastructure and land use patterns in neighborhoods near schools strongly influence the health and safety of our school children. They influence neighborhood walkability, pedestrian and bicyclist safety, traffic circulation patterns and speeds, public transit systems, multimodal choices, and community character and pride. These issues, combined with a limited pool of resources for infrastructure improvements, now call for a precise identification and prioritization of City pedestrian, bicycle, and traffic circulation improvements through community-based master planning efforts. Beginning with the Southwest area and eventually incorporating the entire City, the project focuses on the V.-mile "buffer zones" surrounding each of the City's 37 public elementary schools. Observations are that parents residing within these zones are more apt to allow their children to walk to school, particularly if safe and adequate facilities are available for walking and biking. Therefore, the first stakeholders to gain benefits from this project will be the City's schoolchildren, their families, and their neighbors. Ultimately, the project will have positive impacts for all residents. A unique aspect of this project is its community-directed focus. Stakeholder organizations participating in this planning project will include Healthy Eating, Active Communities (HEAC) and Walk San Diego which are working together as the South Bay Partnership. This partnership works at the community level to reduce childhood obesity by promoting walkability and reducing reliance on cars. The South Bay Partnership will be the City's key planning partner on this project. Other stakeholders will include the recently formed Southwest Chula Vista Civic Association, the Environmental Health Coalition, the Northwest Civic Association, and Crossroads II. Local schools (where the community meetings will take place) and school districts, parent faculty groups and homeowners associations will have critical involvement throughout the process. Jurisdictional stakeholders such as City Councilmembers, the City's redevelopment agency, and impacted City departments such as Public Works and Police will benefit from well-targeted planning outcomes and directives from this project. The City is close to completing the first phase of the project (inventory of the infrastructure) with existing resources. The second phase (community outreach walking audits in partnership with the Southbay Partnership) is the subject of a recently submitted Caltrans Transportation Planning Grant. The first two phases have been completed at two elementary schools (Rice and Otay) and recommended infrastructure improvements are the subject of a Safe Routes to School Grant application being submitted on January 2, 2007 through a partnership with the City of Chula Vista, the Chula Vista Elementary School District and the Southbay Partnership. Additionally, the City recently received approval for a $9.5 million BUD loan to complete work in the area of Castle Park Elementary. This federal funding request would allow us to realize an environmentally sustainable infrastructure demonstration project in our third priority area, Harborside Elementary. The positive impact to the community, should we be successful securing funding to complete infrastructure improvements around four of the city's neediest elementary school, is immeasurable. '7-7 Page 5 January 23, 2007, Iteml Attachment A National Energy Center for Sustainable Communities Facility, Research, Training & Technical Assistance Programs $6 -10 Million Funding will be used to support the construction and operation of a national research, education and training facility dedicated to advancing local community economic development through the deployment of clean, reliable and secure energy technologies. The facility will be located in Chula Vista, California and administered by the National Energy Center for Sustainable Communities. The Center is currently administered as a partnership between the City of Chula Vista and San Diego State University. The funds will be used to match contributions from state, local and private sources designated for: the building construction fund (total building cost estimated at $12-15 million) ; an employment training program for renewable and solar energy equipment installers; and a technical assistance program on energy-efficient community development for municipal officials. Funds would be used for NECSC building design and construction and for research projects relating to improving energy affordability through the integration of advanced renewable and energy-efficient technologies in community development. Further, the earmark could support an NECSC employment training program targeted at unemployed individuals in the region seeking employment as installers of renewable energy technologies, and in particular solar PV and thermal energy technologies. Finally, the earmark could support the formulation of a technical assistance program for municipal officials from economically disadvantaged communities, enabling them to pursue energy-efficient community development and related local jobs training initiatives. 7- g Page 6 January 23, 2007, Iteml Attachment A Palomar Gateway $3,125,000 This project is located in southwest Chula Vista between the Interstate 5 Palomar Street entrance and Industrial Boulevard. The project area is at the heart of the larger surrounding Palomar Gateway District which is within one of the city's primary redevelopment zones. The district contains existing and planned mixed use development, and the Palomar Transit Station-a major terminus for local and regional modes of transportation. The city has identified this project area as an opportunity to strengthen the connection between local land uses and the regional transportation network by applying the principles of smart growth to best serve our residents and visitors. . The project is designed to provide a true gateway to the city, encourage the use of public transit, promote foot traffic and bicycle use throughout the community, attract a superior quality of high- density housing development to the area, and enhance connectivity between all modes of transportation serving the Palomar District. The City has secured $2,000,000 in grant funding through SANDAG and has identified $375,000 in matching funds. Total project cost is estimated at $5,500,000, resulting in a federal funding request of$3,125,000. Without federal assistance, the City will not be able to proceed with this innovative, attractive and functional project. r; a I"'" i Page 7 January 23, 2007, Item-1- Attachment A Renewable Energy Park Partnership- to Complement Sustainable Zero Energy Community (Allied, CEC, CPUC) Diesel Manufacturers, CARB/AQMD $5 - 6 million! This project focuses funding on public private partnerships to develop infrastructure and working models for state of the art alternative fossil free electricity generation systems, complemented by biofuels derived from local waste products and renewable crop resources to demonstrate zero energy center(s), (Corp Yard, University EUC, Civic Center). The project would build on the City's renewable energy and transportation fuel projects to demonstrate their sustainability at the community level and their integration into traditional systems; using local resources, solar, wind, water and sustainable crops and waste to push toward zero fossil fuel consumption. Chula Vista can take advantage of resources such as a local landfill, strong recycling and reuse programs, contracts and existing experience with solar, fuel cell, methane recovery, bio-diesel programs and an emerging research, education and commercial environment to demonstrate a roadmap for urban America to reduce its dependency on fossil fuels. The 500-acre Otay Landfill and adjacent 26-acre Public Works facility are contiguous to a redevelopment area (a 'recycling park that consists mostly of auto dismantling, vehicle operations yards, warehouse space and metal fabricating firms) that also includes fuel cell, solar, natural gas, solar and the proposed hydrogen/natural gas (hythane) fueling facilities as well as the City's Emergency Operations Center. The landfill operator manages flared methane and methane to energy infrastructure, one of the first and largest bio-diesel fleets in the nation and the City's recycling, green waste and trash collection programs. The City also owns the option for 53 free acres of land adjacent the landfill and the local school district owns ten acres adjacent to both parcels for a future public works yard. Those assets and redevelopment designation create the opportunity to establish an energy park with efficiencies and public benefit applications not easily replicable in other parts of the region. The project would involve public private partnerships to expand the City's bio-diesel programs to include the franchise collection and distilling of offal (fats and oils) generated within the City. Those feed stocks can be combined with "cellulose" feedstock grown and harvested from landfill and right of way spaces to generate a consistent, local and environmentally sustainable feedstock for bio-fuels for City vehicles, recycling and trash trucks, school buses, back up generators and other fossil fueled equipment. The locally generated fuels will stabilize fuel costs for local agencies, reduce local emissions, turn waste products into value added resources, create local jobs and demonstrate how locally derived alternative fuels can play an important part in fuel markets and sustainable local practices. The project would also expand the City's solar, fuel cell, back up generation facilities, and add a wind component to demonstrate their closed loop environmental and fossil free potential. 12 1 The Transit-Fleet proposal for hydrogen-Natural Gas (hythane) duplicates $1 million dollars in the range stated here. 1-10 Page 8 January 23, 2007, Item~ Attachment A Sustainable Wastewater Treatment Partnership $10 Million Demonstration project: a Constructed Wetland Treatment System scaled to serve a Chula Vista neighborhood adjacent to an existing water body. These systems utilize the natural process involving wetland vegetation, soils and their associated microbial processes to assist in treating wastewater. They take advantage of many of the same processes that occur in natural wetlands, but do so within a more controlled environment. Operational experience and research shows: a growing interest in the use of constructed wetlands as a part of water treatment, tremendous opportunity for realizing sizable future savings in wastewater treatment costs, and opportunities for upgrading existing large treatment facilities. Funding provided by the National Science Foundation, Department of the Interior, NASA, EPA, Army Corp of Engineers, Department of Agriculture and others have played an important role in stimulating the development of the available information and guidance on more than 15 constructed wetland treatment systems in ten states, including California. The existing systems and their associated case studies provide valuable information regarding the development of cost effective wastewater and storm water run-off projects that also create wetland habitat for waterfowl and other wildlife, along with areas for public education and recreation. Some of these 15 projects have been recognized by the Ford Foundation for Innovation in a Local Government Project and excellence in Engineering by the American Society for Civil Engineers. A scalable, community project for a portion ofChula Vista's wastewater capacity would put Chula Vista and the South Bay at the forefront of a solution for this critical regional challenge-- demonstrating a solution that "solves many problems while creating no new ones." Other potential benefits: . Establishes an alternative waste treatment strategy that secures additional wastewater and reclaimed water capacity, . Demonstrates a locally sustainable model and complements the local watershed and wildlife habitat, . Establishes intellectual capacity for a technology not broadly used in Southern California, . Complements the state Climate Change recommendations, the National Energy Center and local sustainability goals, . Provides an alternative to traditional wastewater treatment and the exposure from a financially and environmentally challenged "business as usual" regional program, . Has the potential to attract complementary funding to complete or expand projects and build on a public education and research component . Works with other local state and federal agencies to provide these benefits. Ii ! i / ..,. / ! Page 9 January 23, 2007, Iteml Attaclunent A Wildland-Urban Interface $1,200,000 The City of Chula Vista is moving toward the adoption of its own Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) Code. This code will be specific to our city's climatic, geological, and topographical needs. As published by DUDEK, the purpose of this WUI Code Implementation Project is to minimize the risk of wildfire while providing for the preservation and management of sensitive biological resources. This pre-disaster strategic plan provides analysis and risk assessment of the City's WUI areas and, based on that risk; lays out a baseline ofWUI related code revision recommendations. The WUI Code Implementation Project indicates that a significant wildfire threat exists within Chula Vista because of several hazardous wildland areas and canyons within the city, including the perimeter of the city adjacent to the Otay Reservoir, the intermix surrounding Rice Canyon and neighboring canyons, and the lower Otay River bottom. This threat is substantiated through a series of fire modeling assessments as performed within the scope of the WUI Code Implementation Project. In addition, the City's Hazard Mitigation Plan identifies wildland fires to be the greatest hazard to the city. This known hazard was further validated during the Wildfire Storm in 2003 where the Mine Fire burned right up to the city's boundary and threatened homes throughout the community. Initial and on-going vegetation maintenance throughout the city is critical to reduce the potential loss of residences, structures, and lives during a wildfire conflagration. Some of these areas in need of fuel reduction currently support sensitive biological resources that are protected under the City of Chula Vista's adopted Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) Subarea Plan. In consultation with the Wildlife Agencies, the City has developed Area Specific Management Directives (ASMDs) for approximately 1,350 acres of designated Preserve land within Rice Canyon. The ASMDs provide specific guidelines for long-term maintenance and management of the Preserve, including techniques for implementing brush management. The WUI Code has been uniquely modified to incorporate fuel reduction techniques that are consistent with the City's MSCP Subarea Plan and the ASMDs, and complementary to the brush management recommendations of the WUI Code. With this modification, implementation of the WUI Code will provide adequate protection for sensitive biological resources, while ensuring the protection of public health and safety by reducing the potential wildland fire risks. Upon implementation, approximately four hundred sixty (460) acres need vegetation management at an estimated cost of $1 ,200,000 for the initial clearance to reduce the significant risk and exposure to disasters. All on-going costs will be assumed by the City of Chula Vista and are addressed within the plan. This project is the first of its kind in the South County; by awarding federal grant funding, it will also be the first to provide visible results. '7-/;;'- Page 10 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING FEDERAL FUNDING REQUESTS FOR SUBMISSION WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista has, for many years, worked cooperatively avd effectively with its Congressional representative on issues concerning this community; and WHEREAS, among the ways we have benefited from this effort is through Federal funds to support projects and programs that the City Council has endorsed; and WHEREAS, Department heads and other key city staff members have developed a package of proposed City projects for which Federal funding assistance may be available in the 2007 legislative session; and WHEREAS, there have been two informal meetings about these proposals with Chula Vista's Congressional representative, Bob Filner, as well as follow-up conversations with members of his staff here in Chula Vista and in Washington D.C.; and WHEREAS, while three are no guarantees that funding will be received for any of these projects, we have been encouraged to submit formal requests to the Congressman's office and to work with him to determine what opportunities may be available to the City; and WHEREAS, with Council approval, staff will begin that effort and provide updated information to the Council as it becomes available; and WHEREAS, a list of proposed City projects was submitted to the City Council for review and comment in an Information Item on December 14, 2006 (Attachment A); and WHEREAS, as of January 10, 2007, no comments have been received, so the list is projects is brought now for formal approval; and WHEREAS, should the City succeed in obtaining funds for one or more of the projects submitted, City staff will return to Council with a more detailed proposal and scope of work. 7-/3 Resolution No. 2007- Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby approve federal funding requests for submission. Presented by: Approved as to form by: An~()'" /fveI City Attorney Jim Thomson City Manager J:\Attorney\RESO\FINANCE\Approving federal funding request for submission_01-23-07.doc 7-/Lj Attachment A Alternative Fuels Pilot Project $750,000 The City proposes taking the next important step in becoming a national showcase for finding and demonstrating practical sustainable energy alternatives by moving two alternative fuels beyond the "experimental" to the practical and accessible. Chula Vista would convert two of its CNG fuel buses to HCNG fuel use. A successful pilot could lead the City to convert it's entire fleet of CNG buses to cleaner burning HCNG(80% CNG enriched with 20% hydrogen). The resulting mix is cleaner than CNG, with 50% fewer nitrous oxide emissions at little or no additional cost. HCNG is the next generation of low-emission fuels and one alternative that has significant promise. The project would also offer the only public dispenser of CNG in the South Bay Region to keep pace with growing demand by truck fleets and private passenger vehicle owners. The next nearby source is in the City Heights area of San Diego (15 miles away). CNG itself provides a significant reduction in polluting emissions when compared to diesel fuel or gasoline. As a result ofChula Vista's participation in prior demonstration projects, the City already owns almost all of the equipment required to produce and deliver HCNG and CNG fuels. Our existing hydrogen electrolyzer, which is the largest in California, was purchased as part of a recent Federal demonstration program funded by the Department of Transportation, the Department of Energy, the California Energy Commission and the City ofChula Vista. This is a very high production electrolyzer, generating as much hydrogen in one hour as many stations generate in a day. To fully utilize the $1 million investment in this equipment, the City plans to produce hydrogen for the HCNG bus demonstration and eventually for the fleet. Chula Vista also owns a CNG compressor station, currently used to dispense CNG to City buses. To combine the hydrogen and CNG into HCNG for the bus demonstration, and to dispense CNG to the public, the project site only requires fuel lines, storage capacity, and a new mixer/dispenser that is weights-and-measures certified for use in private vehicles. $750,000 would purchase the station equipment necessary to transfer, mix, store and dispense the two fuels for this region wide alternative fuels demonstration. There will be a cost to the public for purchase of CNG fuel at the site, as with any other fueling station. The cost would vary with CNG market fluctuations, but in general would be roughly equal to the prevailing cost in Southern California. Cost components would include the City's fuel purchase price plus a small increment to cover City costs for maintenance, delivery, and program administration including bank costs. The City is in the process of completing a bank agreement to accept credit cards. Bank charges will be recouped from the fuel charge. There is already a demand for CNG fuel by the public, but to heighten public awareness about the Chula Vista station, $15,000 in public outreach costs has been factored into the appropriation request. The station would also be listed on Internet natural gas fueling maps for travelers including Clean Car Maps, the California Natural Gas Vehicle Coalition map, and possibly the SDG&E map. 7-/5 Page I Attachment A Bi-National University Park & Research Center Master Plan $3 - 5 Million The Master Plan project will develop an organizational and funding structure for the creation and operation of the campus for the region's first bi-national university; prepare the detailed planning, infrastructure and environmental documents for the campus; and provide an initial capital fund to seed philanthropic support for the construction of campus buildings. A U.S. - Mexico consortium of colleges and universities has developed a prospectus for a bi- national University Park and Research Center on a 450 acre site centered between downtown San Diego and downtown Tijuana - an international metropolitan area of more than 6 million people that includes the busiest land border crossing in the world. With a focus on international issues related to trade, transportation, economic development, energy, security and the environment - the University Park and Research Center campus will become a center for the analyzing and addressing shared challenges in the countries' border regIOns. The campus will provide higher education opportunities in a traditionally underserved area of the region, help to address a significant jobs/housing imbalance, and provide a major forum for the exchange of ideas and solutions for students, faculty, and local, state and federal officials from the U.S. and Mexico. The City ofChula Vista has provided more than $1.2 million in initial funding and will donate the site for the campus. l-Ib Page 2 Attachment A Community Safety and Communication System $5 - 6 Million A comprehensive wired and wireless safety communications system that could serve as the backbone of an improved regional interagency communication system. It could also stabilize future public agency communication costs and provide free WiFi- WiMax services for the public. The project would build on the City's hard wired system that has begun to connect major public facilities and compliment that system with a compatible wireless system that uses free public airwaves to interconnect mobile safety vehicles, personnel and critical infrastructure such as traffic lights and emergency operation centers. Having control of the system infrastructure, intellectual property and airwaves required to run the system would allow Chula Vista to stabilize future costs, establish and maintain emergency priorities and establish a model that will enhance interagency communication. The WiFi-WiMax backbone for safety communications can also stabilize costs for other public service field personnel, replace City broadband capacity and be expanded to provide a free public wireless business model that also enhances local government public education capacity. The proposed project would: . Fund fiber infrastructure to connect the Police Department, Emergency Operations Center, Fire Administration, Fire Stations, Dispatch, traffic signals and other key emergency servIces, . Simultaneously create fiber backbone to reduce costs for connecting the rest of the City facilities, and provide a back up to emergency communications, . Have the capacity to provide some access to agencies with overlapping jurisdiction and further demonstrate the system's interagency communication and financial effectiveness, . Have the potential to replace the current broadband support losses in 2009 from state cable franchises and, stabilize or eliminate the City's future lahdline, internetlintranet and related communication operating costs, . Fund Wireless-WiFi - WiMax backbone to provide stable, reduced cost mobile safety service, . Provide Chula Vista/South Bay with a competitive edge in the WiFi/WiMax development market in San Diego and catch up with North County San Diego and others that have established or are exploring free and low cost WiFi business models, . Fund video production capacity to initially target safety communication messages and ultimately expand Chula Vista and South Bay's public communication outreach and marketing capacity (public and cable franchise video production has often been shared regionally, Chula Vista has never had the benefit of being the host). . Attract complimentary funding to enhance public services and free communication access, . Compliment Chula Vista's developing education, research and commercial infrastructure with broadly available state of the are communications, . Develop a model to invest in all of the above in a manner that reduces existing general fund costs to participating local agencies, stabilizes future costs and expands the City's open, transparent and inclusive public participation and emergency service programs. 7-/1 Page 3 Attachment A Installation of Permanent Domestic Water Line & Resurfacing of Access Road Serving the Chula Vista Nature Center $460,660 The former underground domestic water line had to be abandoned due to significant settling of the levy road that is used to access the Nature Center and Sweetwater Marsh National Wildlife Refuge. The road has been shored and patched, and a temporary potable water line has been installed above ground. This temporary line is providing critical service for maintaining plant and animal collections, and is providing water for restrooms, drinking fountains, and other sanitary needs. The road is federally-owned; the City utilizes an easement. This is the only access route to the National Wildlife Refuge Field Office and to the Nature Center for environmental education and conservation uses. The road was originally constructed by the Army Corps of Engineers but is now maintained by the City. Project would include underground installation ofa new water line and resurfacing of the road. Cost estimate: $460,660 (includes contingencies, per General Services) 7-IF Page 4 Attachment A Missing Infrastructure/ School Zone Traffic and Pedestrian Safety $132,000,000 2,300,000 The City's existing and planned transportation facilities vary dramatically in condition and availability from the newly developing areas of the City to the older aging pre-smart growth neighborhoods. The City Council frequently receives competing requests from the public for local infrastructure improvements. An overwhelming proportion of citizen requests directly correlate with the City Council's desire to ensure safe routes to schools. Public infrastructure and land use patterns in neighborhoods near schools strongly influence the health and safety of our school children. They influence neighborhood walkability, pedestrian and bicyclist safety, traffic circulation patterns and speeds, public transit systems, multimodal choices, and community character and pride. These issues, combined with a limited pool of resources for infrastructure improvements, now call for a precise identification and prioritization of City pedestrian, bicycle, and traffic circulation improvements through community-based master planning efforts. Beginning with the Southwest area and eventually incorporating the entire City, the project focuses on the Y.-mile "buffer zones" surrounding each of the City's 37 public elementary schools. Observations are that parents residing within these zones are more apt to allow their children to walk to school, particularly if safe and adequate facilities are available for walking and biking. Therefore, the first stakeholders to gain benefits from this project will be the City's schoolchildren, their families, and their neighbors. Ultimately, the project will have positive impacts for all residents. A unique aspect of this project is its community-directed focus. Stakeholder organizations participating in this planning project will include Healthy Eating, Active Communities (HEAC) and Walk San Diego which are working together as the South Bay Partnership. This partnership works at the community level to reduce childhood obesity by promoting walkability and reducing reliance on cars. The South Bay Partnership will be the City's key planning partner on this project. Other stakeholders will include the recently formed Southwest Chula Vista Civic Association, the Environmental Health Coalition, the Northwest Civic Association, and Crossroads II. Local schools (where the community meetings will take place) and school districts, parent faculty groups and homeowners associations will have critical involvement throughout the process. Jurisdictional stakeholders such as City Councilmembers, the City's redevelopment agency, and impacted City departments such as Public Works and Police will benefit from well-targeted planning outcomes and directives from this project. The City is close to completing the first phase of the project (inventory of the infrastructure) with existing resources. The second phase (community outreach walking audits in partnership with the Southbay Partnership) is the subject of a recently submitted Caltrans Transportation Planning Grant. The first two phases have been completed at two elementary schools (Rice and Otay) and recommended infrastructure improvements are the subject of a Safe Routes to School Grant application being submitted on January 2, 2007 through a partnership with the City of Chula Vista, the Chula Vista Elementary School District and the Southbay Partnership. Additionally, the City recently received approval for a $9.5 million HUD loan to complete work in the area of Castle Park Elementary. This federal funding request would allow us to realize an environmentally sustainable infrastructure demonstration project in our third priority area, Harborside Elementary. The positive impact to the community, should we be successful securing funding to complete infrastructure improvements around four of the city's neediest elementary school, is immeasurable. Page 5 --; /;-n / -- !"-~1 Attachment A National Energy Center for Sustainable Communities Facility, Research, Training & Technical Assistance Programs $6 -10 Million Funding will be used to support the construction and operation of a national research, education and training facility dedicated to advancing local community economic development through the deployment of clean, reliable and secure energy technologies. The facility will be located in Chula Vista, California and administered by the National Energy Center for Sustainable Communities. The Center is currently administered as a partnership between the City ofChula Vista and San Diego State University. The funds will be used to match contributions from state, local and private sources designated for: the building construction fund (total building cost estimated at $12-15 million); an employment training program for renewable and solar energy equipment installers; and a technical assistance program on energy-efficient community development for municipal officials. Funds would be used for NECSC building design and construction and for research projects relating to improving energy affordability through the integration of advanced renewable and energy-efficient technologies in community development. Further, the earmark could support an NECSC employment training program targeted at unemployed individuals in the region seeking employment as installers of renewable energy technologies, and in particular solar PV and thermal energy technologies. Finally, the earmark could support the formulation of a technical assistance program for municipal officials from economically disadvantaged communities, enabling them to pursue energy-efficient community development and related local jobs training initiatives. 7-20 Page 6 Attachment A Palomar Gateway $3,125,000 This project is located in southwest Chula Vista between the Interstate 5 Palomar Street entrance and Industrial Boulevard. The project area is at the heart of the larger surrounding Palomar Gateway District which is within one of the city's primary redevelopment zones. The district contains existing and planned mixed use development, and the Palomar Transit Station-a major terminus for local and regional modes of transportation. The city has identified this project area as an opportunity to strengthen the connection between local land uses and the regional transportation network by applying the principles of smart growth to best serve our residents and visitors. The project is designed to provide a true gateway to the city, encourage the use of public transit, promote foot traffic and bicycle use throughout the community, attract a superior quality of high- density housing development to the area, and enhance connectivity between all modes of transportation serving the Palomar District. The City has secured $2,000,000 in grant funding through SANDAG and has identified $375,000 in matching funds. Total project cost is estimated at $5,500,000, resulting in a federal funding request of$3,125,000. Without federal assistance, the City will not be able to proceed with this innovative, attractive and functional project. -7 "J j l - ;;::.,..,,{ Page 7 Attachment A Renewable Energy Park Partnership- to Compliment Sustainable Zero Energy Community (Allied, CEC, CPUC) Diesel Manufacturers, CARB/AQMD $5 - 6 million I This project focuses funding on public private partnerships to develop infrastructure and working models for state of the art alternative fossil free electricity generation systems, complimented by biofuels derived from local waste products and renewable crop resources to demonstrate zero energy center(s), (Corp Yard, University EUC, Civic Center). The project would build on the City's renewable energy and transportation fuel projects to demonstrate their sustainability at the community level and their integration into traditional systems; using local resources, solar, wind, water and sustainable crops and waste to push toward zero fossil fuel consumption. Chula Vista can take advantage of resources such as a local landfill, strong recycling and reuse programs, contracts and existing experience with solar, fuel cell, methane recovery, bio-diesel programs and an emerging research, education and commercial environment to demonstrate a roadmap for urban America to reduce its dependency on fossil fuels. The 500-acre Otay Landfill and adjacent 26-acre Public Works facility are contiguous to a redevelopment area (a 'recycling park that consists mostly of auto dismantling, vehicle operations yards, warehouse space and metal fabricating firms) that also includes fuel cell, solar, natural gas, solar and the proposed hydrogen/natural gas (hythane) fueling facilities as well as the City's Emergency Operations Center. The landfill operator manages flared methane and methane to energy infrastructure, one of the first and largest bio-diesel fleets in the nation and the City's recycling, green waste and trash collection programs. The City also owns the option for 53 free acres of land adjacent the landfill and the local school district owns ten acres adjacent to both parcels for a future public works yard. Those assets and redevelopment designation create the opportunity to establish an energy park with efficiencies and public benefit applications not easily replicable in other parts of the region. The project would involve public private partnerships to expand the City's bio-diesel programs to include the franchise collection and distilling of offal (fats and oils) generated within the City. Those feed stocks can be combined with "cellulose" feedstock grown and harvested from landfill and right of way spaces to generate a consistent, local and environmentally sustainable feedstock for bio-fuels for City vehicles, recycling and trash trucks, school buses, back up generators and other fossil fueled equipment. The locally generated fuels will stabilize fuel costs for local agencies, reduce local emissions, turn waste products into value added resources, create local jobs and demonstrate how locally derived alternative fuels can play an important part in fuel markets and sustainable local practices. The project would also expand the City's solar, fuel cell, back up generation facilities, and add a wind component to demonstrate their closed loop environmental and fossil free potential. 12 I The Transit-Fleet proposal for hydrogen-Natural Gas (hythane) duplicates $1 million dollars in the range stated here. -7 _. "7"7 j ;:......~ Page 8 Attachment A Sustainable Wastewater Treatment Partnership $10 Million Demonstration project: a Constructed Wetland Treatment System scaled to serve a Chula Vista neighborhood adjacent to an existing water body. These systems utilize the natural process involving wetland vegetation, soils and their associated microbial processes to assist in treating wastewater. They take advantage of many of the same processes that occur in natural wetlands, but do so within a more controlled environment. Operational experience and research shows: a growing interest in the use of constructed wetlands as a part of water treatment, tremendous opportunity for realizing sizable future savings in wastewater treatment costs, and opportunities for upgrading existing large treatment facilities. Funding provided by the National Science Foundation, Department of the Interior, NASA, EPA, Army Corp of Engineers, Department of Agriculture and others have played an important role in stimulating the development of the available information and guidance on more than 15 constructed wetland treatment systems in ten states, including California. The existing systems and their associated case studies provide valuable information regarding the development of cost effective wastewater and storm water run-off proj ects that also create wetland habitat for waterfowl and other wildlife, along with areas for public education and recreation. Some of these 15 projects have been recognized by the Ford Foundation for Innovation in a Local Government Project and excellence in Engineering by the American Society for Civil Engineers. A scalable, community project for a portion ofChula Vista's wastewater capacity would put Chula Vista and the South Bay at the forefront of a solution for this critical regional challenge-- demonstrating a solution that "solves many problems while creating no new ones." Other potential benefits: . Establishes an alternative waste treatment strategy that secures additional wastewater and reclaimed water capacity, . Demonstrates a locally sustainable model and compliments the local watershed and wildlife habitat, . Establishes intellectual capacity for a technology not broadly used in Southern California, . Compliments the state Climate Change recommendations, the National Energy Center and local sustainability goals, . Provides an alternative to traditional wastewater treatment and the exposure from a financially and environmentally challenged "business as usual" regional program, . Has the potential to attract complimentary funding to complete or expand projects and build on a public education and research component . Works with other local state and federal agencies to provide these benefits. Page 9 7-23 Attachment A Wildland-Urban Interface $1,200,000 The City ofChula Vista is moving toward the adoption of its own Wildland-Urban Interface (WUI) Code. This code will be specific to our city's climatic, geological, and topographical needs. As published by DUDEK, the purpose of this WUI Code Implementation Project is to minimize the risk of wildfire while providing for the preservation and management of sensitive biological resources. This pre-disaster strategic plan provides analysis and risk assessment of the City's WUI areas and, based on that risk; lays out a baseline of WUI related code revision recommendations. The WUI Code Implementation Project indicates that a significant wildfire threat exists within Chula Vista because of several hazardous wildland areas and canyons within the city, including the perimeter of the city adjacent to the Otay Reservoir, the intermix surrounding Rice Canyon and neighboring canyons, and the lower Otay River bottom. This threat is substantiated through a series of fire modeling assessments as performed within the scope of the WUI Code Implementation Project. In addition, the City's Hazard Mitigation Plan identifies wildland fires to be the greatest hazard to the city. This known hazard was further validated during the Wildfire Storm in 2003 where the Mine Fire burned right up to the city's boundary and threatened homes throughout the community. Initial and on-going vegetation maintenance throughout the city is critical to reduce the potential loss of residences, structures, and lives during a wildfire conflagration. Some of these areas in need of fuel reduction currently support sensitive biological resources that are protected under the City ofChula Vista's adopted Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) Subarea Plan. In consultation with the Wildlife Agencies, the City has developed Area Specific Management Directives (ASMDs) for approximately 1,350 acres of designated Preserve land within Rice Canyon. The ASMDs provide specific guidelines for long-term maintenance and management of the Preserve, including techniques for implementing brush management. The WUI Code has been uniquely modified to incorporate fuel reduction techniques that are consistent with the City's MSCP Subarea Plan and the ASMDs, and complimentary to the brush management recommendations of the WUI Code. With this modification, implementation of the WUI Code will provide adequate protection for sensitive biological resources, while ensuring the protection of public health and safety by reducing the potential wildland fire risks. Upon implementation, approximately four hundred sixty (460) acres need vegetation management at an estimated cost of $1 ,200,000 for the initial clearance to reduce the significant risk and exposure to disasters. All on-going costs will be assumed by the City of Chula Vista and are addressed within the plan. This project is the first of its kind in the South County; by awarding federal grant funding, it will also be the first to provide visible results. 7-24 Page 10 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ~f:. (Il)' OF - - - CHULA VISTA January 23, 2007, Item.8. ITEM TITLE: RESOLUTION APPROVING A TENANT-BASED RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM AND AUTHORIZING THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE ALL DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR PROCESSING ACTING DIRECTOR OF CO~ITY DEVELOPMENT ~ INTERIM CITY MANAGER ,J / SUBMITTED BY: REVIEWED BY: 4/5THS VOTE: YES D NO ~ BACKGROUND The City Council recently approved the use of HUD HOME funds for a rental assistance program to help with monthly rental payments for low-income households, offering "displaced persons" a priority. Staffhas developed the program guidelines and all associated forms. At this time, Community Development staff is requesting City Council authorization to both operate the program and execute all documents necessary for processing. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW As required by the HOME program, an environmental review has been conducted in accordance with the National Environmental Protection Act (NEP A), and it has been determined that the development and implementation of a Rental Assistance Program is a Categorically Excluded Activity per 24CFR58.35(b). The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is not a "Project" as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no further environmental review is necessary. RECOMl'1ENDA TION Adopt the resolution approving the City's operation of a Tenant-Based Rental Assistance Program and authorizing the Community Development Director, or designee, to execute all documents necessary for processing. BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Not Applicable 8-1 January 23,2007, Item_ Page 2 of3 DISCUSSION On April 4, 2006 the City Council approved the use of $440,000 in HOME funds from the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) for a tenant-based rental assistance program that would offer "displaced persons" a priority. The first residents to be served are qualifying displaced Jade Bay Mobilehome Park residents, who must vacate their coaches by February 28,2007 as a result of the park's recent bankruptcy. The program can assist low-income households earning at or below 80% of the Area Median Income (currently $55,200 for a family of four) with payment of their monthly rent. The tenants pay approximately 30% of their own income, and then the City pays the difference, up to the "Fair Market Rent" as determined by HUD. This program is an effective way to provide affordable housing within market rate units throughout the City. Federal regulations state that HOME rental assistance may not exceed 24 months, although it can be renewed for another 24 months if the jurisdiction allocates funds for renewal. Many lower income households may also be eligible for HUD's "Section 8" rental assistance program,which does not have a time limitation. The majority of the residents that have applied for the City's rental assistance to date have also applied for Section 8. Depending upon household income, an applicant can wait 3-5 years before receiving Section 8 assistance. It is anticipated that within the 24-48 month period of the City's HOME rental assistance program, some households will transition to either Section 8 or other affordable housing opportunities that do not have a time limitation. Community Development Staff developed program guidelines and all associated forms in accordance with HOME Grant regulations (see Tenant Handbook provided as Attachment 1). Below is a brief description of how the program will operate: I. Tenants apply for assistance as funding is available; 2. City staff will certify income and household eligibility; 3. Eligible tenants will receive informational materials and a voucher explaining the terms of the program at a tenant orientation; 4. Eligible tenants will select a unit in Chula Vista and request property owner to complete owner paperwork; 5. City staff will complete an inspection of the unit; 6. The City and the property owner will enter into a HOME Rental Assistance Contract (Attachment 2); 7. City staff will process monthly assistance payments to the property owner on behalf of the tenant, while the tenant pays their portion of the rent as well; and 8. City staff will re-certify income and household eligibility annually. The program is ready to implement and assist residents. At this time, Community Development Staff is requesting City Council authorization to operate the program as a City Program, and execute all documents necessary for processing at an administrative level. 8-2 January 23, 2007, Item_ Page 3 of3 DECISION MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site specific and consequently the 500 foot rule found in California Code of Regulations section I 8704.2(a)(1) is not applicable to this decision. FISCAL IMPACT The appropriation of $440,000 from HOME funds was previously approved by the City Council on April 4, 2006 and was included in the Fiscal Year 2006-2007 budget. The program will serve approximately 20-30 households over a two-year period. The City Council may allocate additional funds to the program in the future to serve additional households, or extend the term of assistance. Federal funds for City staff services to run this, and other HOME programs, were previously appropriated by the City Council on December 6, 2005. ATTACHMENTS 1. Tenant Handbook 2. HOME Rental Assistance Contract Prepared by: Amanda Mills, Housing Manager, Community Development Dept. 8-3 ATTACHMENT 1 ~v~ ~ -;....----~ ~- ~- OlY OF CHUIA VISTA TENANT HANDBOOK A GUIDE FOR HOME-FUNDED TENANT BASED RENTAL ASSISTANCE PARTICIPANTS Community Development Department Housing Division City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 8-4 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. HOl'vIE Tenant Based Rental Assistance Program .......................................................1 II. Term of the HOME Voucher .................................................................................. 1 III. Determination of Housing Assistance Payment ........................................................1 A. Subsidy Standards ....................................................... ........................... ..... ............ 2 B. Payment Standards............................................................ ...................................... 2 C. Total Tenant Payment ............................................................................................3 D. Gross Rent .............................................................................................................. 3 IV. Choosing Where to Le.~se.......................................................................................4 A. Portability: ................................. ...........................................................:................. 5 V. Finding a Unit ........................................................................................................5 A. Approaching a landlord .......................................................................................... 5 VI. Submitting a Request for Tenancy Approval (RFTA) ................................................6 VII. Inspecting the Unit............................................................................................... 7 VIII. Lead.Based Paint Information ...................... ............... ...... ..... .............. ..... ...........7 IX. Equal Housing Opportunity Laws........................................................................... 8 X. Rights of the Disabled.............................................................................................8 XI. Keeping your assistance ......................................................................................... 8 XII. How to Request an Informal Hearing..................................................................... 9 Additional Briefing Packet Information: Payment Standards Utility j\.llowance Schedule A Good Place to Live Tips to Finding Rental Housing Housing Discrimination Complaint Form 8-5 1. HOME Tenant Based Rental Assistance Program HOME is authorized under Title II of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act, as amended. Program regulations are at 24 CFR Part 92. The City of Chula Vista is using HOME funds for a Tenant Based Rental Program. The concept of the HOME Tenant Based Rental Assistance Program is that the City of Chula Vista subsidizes the rental costs by applying a fi..,ed formula, and the family pays the difference between that subsidy and the amount of rent to the owner (voucher formula). There are limitations of how much the family can pay. 11,ese limitations will be e."'plained further in this handbook. The family will sign a lease agreement, which governs tenllOcy ",~th the landlord, just as they would in the private rental market. The landlord will be required to sign a Housing Assistance Payment Contract with the City of Chula Vista, which spells out the requirements of the owner has to follow. II. Term of the HOME Voucher Your HOJ\IE Voucher (coupon) will be issued on the day of your briefing. The HOME Voucher is valid for the term of ninety (90) days, which is the maximum term under our current policy. Request for e>..'tensions must be submitting prior to e>..-piration (see form in briefing packet). No e"-'tension will be granted after eA1Jiration of the voucher4 You must find a unit and submit a Request for Tenancy i\pproval \v~thin the term of the Voucher. III. Determination of Housing Assistance Payment Housing Assistance Payment (HAP) is the rent subsidy that the City of Chula Vista pays to a landlord on the tenant's behalf. There are four factors that dete1n1ine how the City of Chula Vista calculates the HAP, . Subsidy Standards . Payment Standards . Total Tenant Payment . Gross Rent T enanr Based Renml..-\ssistance Program Handbook Page 1 of9 8-6 A. Subsidy Standards The subsidy standards are used to determine. the maximum rent subsidy for the HOME Tenant Based Rental Assistance Voucher (coupon). For the putpose of determining subsidy standards, the voucher size will be assigned so tilat the head of household and his/her significant other, is allocated one bedroom. }Jl rema.ining household members are allocated one bedroom for every two family members, regardless of se:", age, or relationship of the family members. The City of Chula Vista does not determine who shares a bedroom. According to HUD, the living room may be used as a sleeping room. An unborn child or a child, of whom the family is in the process of obtaining legal custody or adoption, may be included in determining the family's subsidy standard. For families requesting reasonable accommodation due to disability, check with your Community Development Specialist. Request for live-in aide: . The live-in aide must be at least 18 years old, and provide a social security card and/or a government issued identification card. . The live-in aide will be required to sign a St.~tement of Understanding which outlines the policies governing the live-in aide status, and a Personal Declaration of residence and income information. . Contact your Community Development Speciilist to request a live-in aide. B. Payment Standards A payment standard is an amount established by tile City of Chula Vista based on HUD's published Fair Market Rents for each market area and for unit size. TI,e unit size means number of bedrooms per unit. The family mal' select a different size unit than the voucher size listed on the HOrvIE voucher (coupon). The family may choose to rent a smaller size unit as long as the unit is ",-ithin the maximum occupancy standard level under the Housing Quality Standards. HUD defines ma.'<imum occupancy standards as two persons per bedroom/sleeping room. A living room may be counted as a sleeping room. The payment standard does not necessarily equal the Rent to Owner. The payment standard is the lower of . The payment standard for the voucher SIZe listed on the HOME Voucher (coupon); or . The payment standard for the size of unit rented by the family. Tenant Based Rental Assisunce Program Handbook Page2of9 8-7 Once the payment standard is detennined, the City of Chula Vista uses the payment stand:ud to calculate the monthly housing assistance payment for a family. 111e current V ouche! Fayment Standards for the C:itv of Chula Vista is included in this briefing packet. The City uses the Housing A;'thorit)' of the County of San Diego (HACSD) utilit)' allowance schedule. HACSD administers the Section 8 Rental Assistance program in the Cit)' of Chula Vista. C. Total Tenant Payment The total tenant pa)'ment is the greater of: . 30% of the family's gross income (before taxes) after HUD regulated deductions (monthly adjusted income). . 10% of monthly gross income (before taxes ",~th no deductions). . :Minimum rent of $25.00. In most cases, Total Tenant Payment (rIP) is 30% of the family's monthly adjusted income. Adjusted income means your gross income minus the HlJD allowable deductions. D. Gross Rent Gross Rent is the rent to owner plus any utility allo,,'ance. The utility allowance is based on the utilities that the tenant is responsible for paying_(i.e. SDG&E, water, sewer, trash). The Utility Allowance Schedule is included in this briefing packet. Cable television and telephone service are not included in the utility allowance. Examples of total subsidy calculation: 1. Gross Rent less than the payment standard: :Mr. Jones finds a one-bedroom apartment with a rent to owner (contract rent) or $900.00. The apartment has gas heat and electric coolting. She is responsible to pay electricity and gas. His monthly adjusted income is $1,000.00. Her Total Tenant Payment (rIP) is $300.00 ($1,000 X 30%). Rent to Owner 5900.00 Utility i\.llowance S?7.00 Gross Rent 5927.00 $933.00 Pavment Standard TTP -$300.00 -5300.00 Total Subsidy $627.00 5693.00 Total Subsidy IS d,e lesser of the Payment or Q1:0SS rent, minus TTP. Rent to Owner 5900.00 Total Subsidy -$627.00 Citv of Chula Vista Payment to Owner Tenant Share $273.00 Tenant Payment to Owner Tenant Based Renral.-\ss1stance: Program H'andbook Page 3 of9 8-8 2. Gross Rent is more than pa~ment standard. The same familv found a one-bedroom apartment for $1,050 Rent to Owner $1,050.00 Utility Allowance $27.00 Gross Rent $1,077.00 $933.00 Payment Standard TYP -$300.00 -$300.00 Total Subsidy $777.00 $693.00 Tow Subsidy IS the lesser of the Payment or !<toss rent, minus TYP. Rent to Owner $1,050.00 ToW Subsidy -$693.00 City of Chula Vista Payment to Owner Tenant Share $357.00 Tenant Payment to Owner Affordabilii;1' Check Whenever the gross rent is grearer than the payment standard, as in example 2 above, the City of Chula VIsta must conduct an affordability test. Ibis check is done because HUD regulations prohibit fa.rnilies from paying more than 40% of their monthly adjusted income as the Total Family Contribution (rent plus utilities) at the time of initial move in. The affordability check is calculated as follows: Gross Rent $1,077.00 ToW Subsidy 5693.00 ToW Family Contribution $357.00 40% of Monthly Adjusted Income $400.00 (1,000 x 40%) Since the toW family contribution is less than 40% of the monthly adjusted income, the family passes the affordabili!y check and the City of Chula Vista can approve the unit. IV. Choosing Where to Lease The family may lease a unit anywhere in the City of Chula Vista, as long as the unit meets the Housing Quality Standards (HQS) and the rent is reasonable and comparable to unassisted units \vith similar amenities in the same general market area. A Good Place to Live booklet, which outlines some aspects of the Housing Quality Standards, is included in the briefing package. Limitations · You mal' not pay mme than 40% of your monthly-adjusted income as toW family contnbution (your share of the rent plus utility allowance). . You may not rent a unit that is currently receiving other renW assistance. . You may not rent a unit tllat is owned or controlled by a parent, grandparent, child, grandchild, or sibling of any member of your family, unless tl1e City of Chula Tenant Based Rental Assistance: Program Handbook Page 4 of9 8-9 Vista has determined that approving the unit would be a reasonable accommodation for a family member who is a person with disabilities. . Shared housing is limited to specific conditions. Please contact your Community Deyelopment Specialist A. Portability: HOlvfE Tenant Based Rental j\.ssistance applicants or participants may not utilize the portability. V. Finding a Unit The City of Chula 'list>. has included a current Ayailable Units Property Listing in this briefing packet. To obtain an updated listing, you may make your request in person or by bringing your youcher to our office or by writing/faxing your request with a copy of your youcher to the City of Chula Vista. If the City of Chula 'list>. has any listings of accessible units, we will identify them as such in our listings. There are many other resources you can rely on in finding a unit. Some of them are: . Check the local newspaper for listings of houses or apartments for rent. . Contract local real estlte agents that advertise rental units . Look for "for rent" signs when driving or taking d,e bus. . Ask your friends or neighborhood center. They may know of certain ayailable units. A. Approaching a landlord Before you Start, you may want to go over the Inspection Checklist that is included in this briefing packet. This checklist contains the items neeed in passing Housing Quality Standards (HQS). Having the knowledge of the HOME Tenant Based Rental Assistance program and the ability to articulate clearly how the program works would put the landlord at ease if he/ she has never dealt 'W-:ith the program before. As a potential tenan~ you should remember that there are often many families competing for the rental of one unit. Think from the landlord's point of view: why would be/she want to rent to you rather than someone else (whether on TBR.i\., Section 8 assis=ce or unassisted)? !I{any landlords will conduct a credit check that usually includes credit and e,-:icnon histoty. They may also ask you to fill out their own rental application. If you have a poor credit history, or have been evicted, tell the landlord at d,e beginning. Explain the situation clearly and rationally. There are landlords who Tenant Based Rental Assistance Progtam Handbook P'ge50f9 8-10 are 'W-illing to give families a second chance. More information is listed in this briefing packet: Findin" a Place to Live. Things to ask the landlord . What is the security deposit amount? It is your (tenant) responsibility to pay the deposit to the landlord. The landlotd may ask the m.....cimum deposit allowed under the State and Local laws. · Are there any house rules in addition to the lease agreement? . Is there any maintenance you are required to do yourself? An e.,ample would be yard maintenance. . What are the penalties/ charges if you pay your rent late? . Does the owner allow pets? . How are maintenance request submitted, in the event you need a repair to your unit? This information may be provided either orally or in writing. VI. Submitting a Request for Tenancy Approval (HETA) In order for the City of Chula Vista to begin the process for approving the lease for your unit, we require the following: . A completed ,and signed Request for Tenancy Approval (Two sides, required HUD form) · A Model Lease (owner may choose to use his/lier own lease and not our Model lease) . The HUD Tenancy Addendum (required attachment). · A completed and signed W-9 (the landlord will provide this to the City separately). In addition, the unit must be vacant and ready to occupy when you submit your RFTA. This does not apply if you are leasing the unit where you currendy reside. You mal' drop off the RFTA paperwork in person or you can mail it to our office. Upon receipt of the completed paperwork, the City's Community Development Specialist will contact you and the landlord and schedule a move-in inspection within 5 working days. Tenant Based Rental Assistance Program tbndbook Page 6 of9 8-11 VII. Inspecting the Unit The City of Chub. Vista is required by HUD to conduct a Housing Quality St,~ndards (HQS) inspection prior to beginning a lease. The City Co=unity Deyelopment Specialist will inspect both the exterior and interior of the unit to ensure that the unit is in decent, safe and sanitary condition. All utility services must be operable at the time of inspection. When the unit passes inspection, the City of Chub. Vista staff mal' negotiate the Rent to Owner, based on dle oyerall condition of the property, rents for comparable units, and whether the total tenant contribution e.'tceeds 40% of your monthly-adjusted income. Do not move into the unit until the City staff adYises you of the effectIve date of the lease and your share of the rent to dle landlord. You are responsible for 100% of the contract rent if you move in prior to the effective date of the lease and Housing Assistance Payment contract. If the unit fails the move-in (initial) inspection, the landlord will be informed of the failed items and be given time to make the repairs. You mal' not move in until the unit passes HQS inspection. If you are leasing in place, the lease and Housing Assistance Payment contract cannot s= until the unit passes the inspection. The City will conduct one follow- up inspection. If the unit fails again, you will be informed of the decision and advised to find another suitable unit, if you have time left on you HOME Tenant Based Rental Assistance (TBRA) Voucher (coupon) when you last submitted your last RFTA. For example, your voucher has 14 days left on the day you submitted the RFT.^,. Thirty days has passed and now the City informs you dlat the RFTA is deuied because the unit failed inspection. Your voucher e'.-pired. You will be given back the 14 days to look for alternatIve housing. Although the City of Chula Vista ",-ill make every attempt to negotiate rent ",~th dle landlord, there are limitations with the HOME TBRA program and we must comply \vith HUD requirements. DO NOT enter into "side agreement" with the landlord to pay any amount above and beyond what is stated on the lease agreement. Violation of this . . rule is cause for termination of your housing assistance. VIII. Lead-Based Paint Information A copy of the brochure entitled Protect Your Family From Lead in Your Home is included in the briefing packet. Please read this brochure about the health hazards of lead-based paint. This is especially important if you have children under the age of si't and find a unit to rent which was built befote January 1,1978. Tenant Based Renml. .:\ssistlnce Program Handbook Page 7 of9 8-12 IX. Equal Housing Opportunity Laws There are Federal, State, and Local laws that apply to the prohibition of dis~rim;n.tion under certain citeumstances when tenting a unit. It is illegal to deny housing to any individual based on race, religion, national origin, immigration status, sex, presence of children, marital status, se""al orientation, or disability. We have included in this briefing packet information on the local Fait: Housing Agencies and a pamphlet titled Fait Housing Resources in the San Diee.<> Region. X. Rights of the Disabled People \vith disabilities are entitled to full and equal access to housing. Landlords, when requested, must make reasonable accommodations in their roles, policies, and practices. It is tl,e responsibility of the family to pay for the necessary modifications to the unit. XI. Keeping your assistance Receiving HOME TBRA assistance requires mat you comply \vim certain family obligations. These obligations are listed in your voucher (coupon) and in your Tenant Handbook. It is inlportant you become fanliliar ,vim mese obligations, as failure to comply will result in termination of your HOME TBM assistance. Eacl, year, me City of Chula Vista Community De,'elopment staff \v-ill conduct an annual recertification to determine your continued eligibility. In addition, me unit will be inspected at least annually to ensure its continued compliance with me Housing Quality Standards. It is inlportant mat you report any needed repairs to your landlord in a timely manner. You are also required to report changes in family size in writing to tl,e City of Chula Vista Community Development Department. Changes in income do not have to be reported to me City. We ",-ill determine if an adjustment in your rent portion is necessary and ",-ill send you an inteniew appointment if needed. In addition to complying ",ith me family obligations listed on your youcher (coupon) and this tenant handbook, you and your family members must comply ",ith the follO\ving: · Respond to any written or oral communication from me City promptly. . Not owe any money tn the City or any Housing Aumority. . Provide true and complete information TeIl1U1t Based Rentul ~1.ssistance Program Handbook Page 8 of9 8-13 . Not breach an agreement ~vith the City to pay amounts owed. . Not engage in threatening, abusive, or violent behavior toward the City's staff. . Not have drug or alcohol abuse that interferes with health, safety, or peaceful enjoyment of the premises or other residents. . Not commit any drug-related criminal actiyity or ;iolent criminal activity. o Dmg-rela/ed criminal history if the illegal JJJalmfac/u1"C, sale, distribl/lioll, sale, distdbll/ion, lIse or possessioll witb tbe illtelll 10 JJlamifactJ/re, sell, distn"bllte, or Jlse a cOlltrolled substalIce. o Drug-related mJJliJlal acti11i!J1 ~JeaJlS 011 or off tbe premises, 1/01 ;its! 011 or Ilear tbe prelllises illcllldillgposswioll of dmgparaphemalia. o f-7iolellt crimi/1a1 actit,iO' illCiIldfS cn"1lIiHal aciil,it)' that has Olle of its elOJJJCllts tbe lise, atte1l1'led 1m, or Ibreal'lIed 1m of pb)'Jical farce agaillsl a pmon or property, alld js v.illg mgaged fo' a/!JrfOJJli!} melllber. Note: Assistance mal' be terminated if a preponderance of evidence indicates that a family member has engaged in the drug related or violent criminal activity, whether or not an anest or a conviction is made. XII. How to Request an Informal Hearing The City Community Development Dhision is required to provide participants families with an informal bearing under the follm;ing circumstances: . A determination of the family's annual or adjusted income, and the use of such income to compute the housing assistance payment. A determination of the appropriate utility allowance, if any, for tenant-paid utilities from the Housing Authority provide schedule. A determination of the subsidy standards or a denial or the family's request for an exemption from the standards. /\. determination to terminate assistance for a participant family because of the family's action or failure to act. A determination to terminate assistance because the participant family has been absent from the assisted unit for longer that the ma..'<imum period permitted under the City's policy and HUD rules. . . . . In the case of termination of assistance, the City must give the family an opportunity for an informal hearing before the City tenninates the Housing Assistance Payment (Hi\P) Contract. The City ",ill simultaneously provide notice of the contract tennination to the landlord so it coincides \v-ith the termination of assistance. 111e family must request an informal hearing in writing before the deadline stated I the notice. The notice ,;ill state to wbom the hearing request should be addressed. Tenant Based Rental Assistance Program H:t.ndbook Page 90f9 8-14 THE ATTACHED AGREEMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED AS TO FORM BY THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE AND WILL BE FORMALLY SIGNED UPON APPROVAL BY THE CITY COUNCIL ~qjL0./-hI! Ann Moore City Attorney Dated: 1/18/07 Home Rental Assistance Contract 8-15 ATTACHMENT 2 ~(~ =-L-:: CI1YOf CHUlA VISTA Community Development Department HOME RENTAL ASSISTANCE CONTRACT LANDLORD NAME & ADDRESS UNIT NO. & ADDRESS TENANT NAME Telephone No. This HOME Rental Assistance Contract ("Contract") is entered into between the Citv of Chula Vista and the Landlord identified above. This Contract applies only to the Tenant family and the dwelling unit identified above. 1. TERM OF THE CONTRACT The term of this Contract shall begin on and end no later than Contract automatically terminates on the last day of the term of the Lease. . The 2. SECURITY DEPOSIT A. The tenant will pay a security deposit to the Landlord in the amount of $ . The Landlord will hold this security deposit during the period the Tenant occupies the dwelling unit under the Lease. The Landlord shall comply with state and local laws regarding interest payments on security deposits. B. After the Tenant has moved from the dwelling unit, the Landlord may, subject to state and local law, use the security deposit, including any interest on the deposit, as reimbursement for rent or any other amounts payable by the Tenant under the Lease. The Landlord will give the Tenant a written list of all items charged against the security deposit and the amount of each item. After deducting the amount used as reimbursement to the Landlord, the Landlord shall promptly refund the full amount of the balance to the Tenant. C. The Landlord shall immediately notify the City of Chula Vista when the Tenant has moved from the Contract unit. 3. RENT AND AMOUNTS PAYABLE BY TENANT AND THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA A. Initial Rent. The initial total monthly rent payable to the Landlord for the first _months of this Contract is $ B. Rent Adjustments. With no less than 60 days' notice to the Tenant and the City of Chula Vista, the owner may propose a reasonable adjustment to be effective no earlier than the 13th month of this Contract. The proposed rent may be rejected by either the Tenant or the City of Chula Vista. The Tenant may reject the proposed rent by providing the Landlord with 30 days' written notice of intent to vacate. If the City of Chula Vista rejects the proposed rent, the City of Chula Vista must give both the Tenant and the Landlord 30 days' notice of intent to terminate the Contract. C. Tenant Share of the Rent. Initially, and until such time as both the Landlord and the Tenant are notified by the City of Chula Vista, the Tenant's share of the rent shall be $ 8-16 ~I~ =-:-1::' - CITY Of CHUlA VISfA Community Development Department HOME Rental Assistance Contract (Page Two) D. City of Chu/a Vista Share of the Rent. Initially, and until such time as both the Landlord and Tenant are notified by the City of Chula Vista, the City of Chula Vista's share of the rent shall be $ . Neither the City of Chula Vista nor HUD assumes any obligation for the Tenant's rent, or for payment of any claim by the Owner against the Tenant. The City of Chula Vista's obligation is limited to making rental payments on behalf of the Tenant in accordance with this Contract. E. Payment Conditions. The right of the owner to receive payments under this Contract shall be subject to compliance with all of the provisions of the Contract. The Landlord shall be paid under this Contract on or about the first day of the month for which the payment is due. The Landlord agrees that the endorsement on the check shall be conclusive evidence that the Landlord received the full amount due for the month, and shall be a certification that: 1. the Contract unit Is in decent, safe and sanitary condition, and that the Landlord is providing the services, maintenance and utilities agreed to in the Lease. 2. the Contract unit is leased to and occupied by the Tenant named above in this Contract. 3. the Landlord has not received and will not receive any payments as rent for the Contract unit other than those identified in this Contract. 4. to the best of the Landlord's knowledge, the unit is used solely as the Tenant's principal place of residence. F. Overpayments. If the City of Chula Vista determines that the Landlord is not entitled to any payments received, in addition to other remedies, the City of Chula Vista may deduct the amount of the overpayment from any amounts due the Landlord, including the amounts due under any other Rental Assistance Coupon Contract. 4. HOUSING QUALITY STANDARDS AND LANDLORD-PROVIDED SERVICES A The Landlord agrees to maintain and operate the Contract unit and related facilities to provide decent, safe and sanitary housing in accordance with 24 CFR Section 882.109, including all of the services, maintenance and utilities agreed to in the Lease. B. The City of Chula Vista shall have the right to inspect the Contract unit and related facilities at teast annually, and at such other times as may be necessary to assure that the unit is in decent, safe, and sanitary condition, and that required maintenance, services and utilities are provided. C. If the City of Chula Vista determines that the Landlord is not meeting these obligations, the City of Chula Vista shall have the right, even if the Tenant continues in occupancy, to terminate payment of the City of Chula Vista's share of the rent and/or terminate the Contract. 5. TERMINATION OF TENANCY The Landlord may evict the Tenant following applicable state and local laws. The Landlord must give the Tenant at least 30 days' written notice of the termination and notify the City of Chula Vista in writing when eviction proceedings are begun. This may be done by providing the City of Chula Vista with a copy of the required notice to the tenant. 8-17 ~ff? -r- - ~ OlYOF CHUlA VISfA Community Development Deportment HOME Rental Assistance Contract (Page Three) 6. FAIR HOUSING REQUIREMENTS A. Nondiscrimination. The landlord shall not, in the provision of services or in any other manner, discriminate against any person on the grounds of age, race, color, creed, religion, sex, handicap, national origin, or familial status. The obligation of the landlord to comply with Fair Housing Requirements Insures to the benefit of the United States of America, the Department of Housing and Urban Development, and the City of Chula Vista, any of which shall be entitled to involve any of the remedies available by law to redress any breach or to compel compliance by the Landlord. B. Cooperation in Quality Opportunity Compliance Reviews. The landlord shall comply with the City of Chula Vista and with HUD in conducting compliance reviews and complaint investigations pursuant to all applicable civil rights statutes, Executive Orders and all related rules and regulations. 7. CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND HUD ACCESS TO LANDLORD RECORDS A. The landlord shall provide any information pertinent to this Contract which the City of Chula Vista or HUD may reasonably require. B. The landlord shall permit the City of Chula Vista of HUD, or any of their authorized representatives, to have access to the premises and, for the purposes of audit and examination, to have access to any books, documents, papers, and records of the landlord to the extent necessary to determine compliance with this Contract. 8. RIGHTS OF CITY OF CHULA VISTA IF LANDLORD BREACHES THE CONTRACT A. Any of the following shall constitute a breach of the Contract: (1) If the landlord has violated any obligation under this Contract; or (2) If the landlord has demonstrated any intention to violate any obligation under this Contract; or (3) If the landlord has committed any fraud or made any false statement in connection with the Contract, or has committed fraud or made any false statement in connection with any Federal housing assistance program. B. The City of Chula Vista's right and remedies under the Contract include recovery of overpayments, termination or reduction of payments, and termination of the Contract. If the City of Chula Vista detemnines that a breach has occurred, the City of Chula Vista may exercise any of its rights or remedies under the Contract. The City of Chula Vista shall notify the landlord in writing of such determination, including a brief statement of the reasons for the determination. The notice by the City of Chula Vista to the landlord may require the landlord to take corrective action by a time prescribed in the notice. C. Any remedies employed by the City of Chula Vista in accordance with this Contract shall be effective as provided in a written notice by the City of Chula Vista to the landlord. The City of 8-18 ~ff? -fi- -~ Cl1YQF CHUlA VISTA Community Development Department HOME Rental Assistance Contract (Page Four) Chula Vista's exercise or non-exercise of any remedy shall not constitute a waiver of the right to exercise that or any other right or remedy at any time. 9. CITY OF CHULA VISTA RELATION TO THIRD PARTIES A. The City of Chula Vista does not assume any responsibility for, or liability to, any person injured as a result of the Landlord's action or failure to act in connection with the implementation of this Contract, or as a result of any other action or failure to act by the Landlord. B. The Landlord is not the agent of the City of Chula Vista and this Contract does not create or affect any relationship between the City of Chula Vista and any lender to the Landlord, or any suppliers, employees, contractors or subcontractors used by the Landlord in connection with th is Co ntract. C. Nothing in this Contract shall be construed as creating any right of the Tenant or a third party (other than HUD) to enforce any provision of this Contract or to asses any claim against HUD, the City of Chula Vista or the Landlord under this Contract. 10. CONFLICT OF INTEREST PROVISIONS A. No employee of the City of Chula Vista who formulates policy or influences decisions with respect to the Rental Assistance Program, and no public official or member of a goveming body or state of local legislator who exercise his functions or responsibilities with respect to the program shall have "ny direct or indirect interest during this person's tenure, or for one year thereafter, in this contract or in any proceeds or benefits arising from the Contract or to any benefits which may arise from it. 11. TRANSFER OF THE CONTRACT The Landlord shall not transfer in any form this Contract without the prior written consent of the City of Chula Vista. The City of Chula Vista shall give its consent to a transfer if the transferee agrees in writing (in a form acceptabie to the City of Chula Vista) to comply with all terms and conditions of this Contract. 12. ENTIRE AGREEMENT: INTERPRETATION A. This Contract contains the entire agreement between the Landlord and the City of Chula Vista. No changes in this Contract shall be made except in writing signed by both the Landlord and the City of Chula Vista. B. The Contract shall be interpreted and implemented in accordance with HUD requirements. 8-19 ~\~ ::-L-:: ~ OlYOF CHUlA VISfA Community Development Deportment HOME Rental Assistance Contract (Page Five) 13. WARRANTY OF LEGAL CAPACITY AND CONDITION OF UNIT A. The landlord warrants the unit is in decent, safe, and sanitary condition as defined in 24 CFR Section 882.109, and that the landlord has the legal right to lease the dwelling unit covered by this Contract during the Contract term. B. The party, if any, executing this Contract on behalf of the landlord hereby warrants that authorization has been given by the landlord to execute it on behalf of the landlord. landlord Name (Type or Print): (City of Chula Vista) Representative (Type of Print): (Signature/Date) (Signature/Date) WARNING: 18 U.S.C. 1001 provides, among other things, that whoever knowingly and willingly makes or uses a document or writing containing any false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements or entries, in any matter within the jurisdiction of any department or agency of the United States, shall be fined not more than $10,000, or imprisoned for not more than five years, or both. lANDLORD'S CHECK TO BE MAilED TO: 55 NO. NAME(S) ADDRESS SIGNATURE OF OWNER DATE SIGNATURE OF OWNER DATE 8-20 COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION APPROVING A TENANT BASED RENTAL ASSISTANCE PROGRAM AND AUTHORIZING THE COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR TO EXECUTE ALL DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR PROCESSING WHEREAS, the City of Chula Vista desires to assist low-income households through the development and implementation of affordable housing programs; and WHEREAS, the provision of affordable housing opportunities is consistent with and called for by the City's General Plan Housing Element, Consolidated Plan, and California Health and Safety Code; and WHEREAS, HOME funds have been identified as the funding source for the Program; and WHEREAS, as required by the HOME program, an environmental review has been conducted in accordance with the National Environmental Protection Act (NEPA), and it has been determined that the development and implementation of a Rental Assistance Program is a Categorically Excluded Activity per 24CFR58.35(b); and WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is not a "Project" as defmed under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no further environmental review is necessary. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby approve the implementation of a Tenant Based Rental Assistance Program, in an effort to provide affordable housing consistent with the City's General Housing Element and Consolidated Plan. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, the Community Development Director, or their designee, is authorized to execute all documents necessary for processing. Presented by Ann Hix Acting Director Development of Community Approved as to form by ~~13MP~ /~ oore City Attorney J:\COIvfMDEV\RESOS\Rental Assistance Program. doc 8-21 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ~~ (lIT OF ~~ (HULA VISTA Item No.: q Meeting Date: 1-23-07 ITEM TITLE: RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING AND ESTABLISHING CONDITIONS OF A TENTATIVE MAP TO DIVIDE INTEREST IN .45 ACRES AT 582 ARIZONA STREET FOR A ONE-LOT CONDOMINIUM CONTAINING 12 RESIDENTIAL UNITS. + DIRECTOR OF PLANN.! ING AND BUlLDIN, /. . CITY MANAGER' d { , SUBMITTED BY: REVIEWED BY: 4/5THS VOTE: YES NOX BACKGROUND The applicant, Floit Homes, is requesting approval of a Tentative Subdivision Map, PCS-06-l2, that would convert an existing l2-unit apartment complex, constructed on .42 acres in 1989, into 12 condominium units for individual ownership at 582 Arizona Street. Pursuant to the Chula Yista Municipal Code (CYMC), Section 15.6, and the City ofChula Yista Subdivision Manual, a Tentative Subdivision Map is required for the proposed conversion in order to determine if the Project complies with necessary regulations. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project qualifies for a Class 1 (existing facilities) categorical exemption pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Thus, no further environmental review is necessary. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the attached draft City Council Resolution approving the Tentative Subdivision Map for PCS-06-l2, based on the findings and subject to the conditions contained therein. 9-1 Date, Item No.: q Meeting Date: I - 23. o~ Page 2 of7 BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION On November 29, 2006, the Planning Commission (Commissioner Tripp absent) considered the proposed Proj ect and voted unanimously (6-0-1) to recommend that the City Council approve the Tentative Subdivision Map application. Before the existing 12-unit apartment complex was constructed, nearly twenty years ago, the Design Review Committee approved the site plan and architecture for it (DRC-88-48) on January 19, 1989. As per Chula Vista's condominium conversion requirements, a Design Review application was submitted along with the tentative subdivision map for the proposed condominium conversion. On August 4, 2006, the City's Zoning Administrator approved DRC-06-55, which proposed no significant exterior structural changes, but rather minor design upgrades. DISCUSSION Project Site Characteristics The Project site is a 60.02' x 307.68' rectangular-shaped lot that is relatively flat, with a slight downward slope in the middle of the property. It is located on a cul-de-sac in the southern portion of Chula Vista, east of Broadway between L Street and Moss Street in the R-3 Zone, and is accessed from Arizona Street (see Locator, Attachment 1). The driveway has sloped concrete pavement toward the center swale and catch basin for proper drainage. There are two, 3-story buildings on the site, each containing six units above six 2-stall garages. There is a small recreation room in Building A and a smaller room in Building B. There are also two guest parking spaces on the site. (See Attachment 5, Tentative Map and Building Elevations). The Project site is surrounded by other apartment complexes in all directions, as indicated below. Site: North: South: East: West: General Plan Residential High Residential High Residential High Residential High Residential High Zoning R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 R-3 Current Land Use Multi-Family Residential Multi-Family Residential Multi-Family Residential Multi-Family Residential Multi-Family Residential Project Description The complex consists of 12 three-bedroom units with attached two-stall garages. Improvements will include repairing and repainting exterior surfaces, re-striping the parking area, enhancing the landscaping and fencing, and providing a new barbeque area and trash enclosure. Regarding interior improvements, each unit will be renovated with new carpeting, tile, doors, windows, hardware, etc. In the attached garages, storage spaces will be added for each unit. 9-2 Date, Item No.: "1 Meeting Date: 1-1.;'-01 Page 3 of 7 Project Data DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS RequiredIPermitted ProDosed/Existing Building Setbacks: Building Setba~ks: Front: 15 feet Front 15 feet. Side: 5 feet & 5 feet Side: 9 feet & 24 feet Exterior Side: N/A Exterior Side: N/A Rear: 15 feet Rear: 15 feet Building Height: 28 feet/45 feet Building Height: 31 feet Parking: 24 n 2 parking stalls per unit Parking: 26 - One 2-stall garage per unit, plus 2 guest parking spaces Open Space: 480 sq. ft. ner unit Open Space: Over 480 sq. ft. per unit Storage: 250 cu. ft./ 3 bedroom unit Storage: 284 cu. ft./unit This project is consistent with the City's Multi-Family Residential (R-3) Zone, General Plan designation of Residential High, Design Manual, Landscape Manual, and all other applicable codes and regulations of the CVMe. Analysis The proposed conversion from apartments to condominium units will not change the existing residential use. What will change is that the units will be for individual ownership, and the property will be significantly improved. The Applicant submitted a "Property Condition Assessment Report" otherwise know as a "Physical Elements Report," which lists recommendations that will upgrade the property and individual units. Staff has incorporated the recommendations as conditions of approval in the draft City Council Resolution. Noticing Documentation Pursuant to Section 66452 of the Subdivision Map Act, condominium conversion projects must satisfy certain noticing requirements for specified time periods. Table I, below identifies: I) The noticing requirements; 2) When existing and prospective tenants should receive the notices; and 3) When the requirement was met. As the table indicates, tenants were notified of the condominium conversion proposal in December 2003. Tenants who have moved into the complex since then were given a notice prior to signing their lease agreement. At the appropriate time, each tenant will be given notice of having the first option to purchase a unit. Sample notices provided by the Applicant are attached (see Attachment 3, Noticing Documentation). TABLE I: Noticing Documentation NOTICE REQUIREMENT HOW LONG & WHEN COMPLIANCE 60-day notice to all existing tenants 60 days prior to filing a Design 60-day notices were sent of intent to convert - "Form A"* Review and Tentative Map certified mail to existing aoolication with the City tenants on December 2003. 9-3 Date, Item No.: 11 Meeting Date: 1-1::'-01- Page 4 of 7 Notice to all prospective tenants of Prior to acceptance of any rent Applicant has submitted a intent to convert- "Form B"* or deposit from the prospective current tenant list with copies tenant of signed forms for all new tenants that moved in after December 2003. I O-day notice to all existing tenants 10 days before or after To be determined/ Typically of an application of a Public Report- submittal of the Public Report following Final Map approval "Form C" to the Department of Real Estate 10-day Notice to all existing tenants Within 10 days of approval of To be determined/ Typically of Final Map aooroval- "Form D" the Final Mao bv the City following Final Mao aooroval Notice to all prospective tenants of Prior to acceptance of any rent To be determined prior to option to purchase/termination of or deposit from the prospective approval of Final Map tenancy - "F orm E" tenant 90-day Notice to all existing tenants For a period of 90 days after To be determined prior to of option to purchase/termination of issuance of the Public Report approval of Final Map tenancy - "F onn F" from the Department of Real Estate l80-day notice to all existing tenants 180 days prior to termination of l80-day notices were sent of intent to convert/termination of tenancy certified mail to existing tenancy - "F arm G" tenants in December 2003. * Attachment G - Noticing Documentation Prior to approval of the Final Map, the City Council needs to fmd that the Applicant has submitted Forms "A" and "B". The remaining notices will be required after approval of the Final Map. HomebuyerlRelocation Assistance When the Applicant decides to convert the units to condos, a community meeting will be held, inviting all tenants to come and learn how they can purchase the unit that they live in. If the tenants decide to relocate, the applicant will refund each tenant one month's rent, plus their entire security deposit. Property Condition Assessment Report In addition to painting the interiors of all units, the Applicant is proposing to repair or replace the heating units; water-damaged building elements and materials; bathroom fixtures; kitchen appliances; countertops; cabinets; sinks; flooring; and other suggested improvements per the "Property Condition Assessment Report." The Project's CC&Rs will address site maintenance and monthly payment of provided utilities. Table 2, below, lists the existing services/utilities within the Proj ect. TABLE 2: Existing Utilities SERVICEIUTILITY STATUS Air conditioning Not provided Heating Individual electric wall heaters 9-4 Date, Item No.: Cj Meeting Date: 1.1"?-t:} Page 5 of7 Water heaters Individual gas-fired hot water heater III utility closet Gas Individual gas meters Electric meter Individual electrical meters Water HOA Sewer HOA Cable* Individual unit Telephone' Individual unit 'Not covered by the HOA Staff recommends that all of the following improvements be included in Applicant's building permit scope of work: . All items listed in Section 1.3, Recommended Immediate Repairs of the Property Condition Assessment Report . All items listed in Section 1.4, Recommended Short-Term and Intermediate-Term Repairs of the Property Condition Assessment Report . Section N, Other Comments of the Property Condition Assessment Report, pertaining to the stair system and landscaping of the property . New windows complying with 2005 California Energy requirements Chula Vista Municipal Code Requirements Pursuant to Chapter 15.56, Conversion of Dwelling Units to Independent Ownership, apartments converted to condominiums for sale must conform to the following: Uniform Housing Code - The project is required to conform to the Uniform Housing Code requirements in existence at the time of the approval of the Subdivision Map. A housing inspection has been completed for the project. A condition of approval requires any deficiencies to be corrected prior to Final Map approval. Protective Lighting Standards of the Uniform Housing Code - The Project went through Design Review in 1988 as part of the original development application. All the original Design Review conditions regarding lighting were fulfilled to the satisfaction of the City, including conformance with Section 17.28.030 (residential districts) and 17.28.040 (lighting plans) of the Municipal Code. Storage Space - Section 15.56.020 requires adequate storage area for each unit. Three-bedroom units are required to have 250 cu. ft. of storage. Existing and proposed storage space is provided for the Project as follows: In each garage, the Applicant will provide two hanging storage cabinets measuring 102 cubic feet each for a total of 204 cubic feet within each garage. An additional 80 cubic feet of storage space is currently being provided on the second floor deck. The combined total area of storage space is 284 cubic feet for each unit, which exceeds the requirement. 9-5 Date, Item No.: q Meeting Date: l-l"3-D:r Page 6 of7 Off-street Parking - Off-street parking required in the R-3 Zone is a minimwn of two parking spaces per three-bedroom unit. The Project provides 2-stall garages underneath and contiguous to each unit. Guest parking spaces are not required; however, the Project provides two open guest parking spaces on the site. Chula Vista Design Manual- The Project is required to comply'with the City's Design Manual. The Applicant submitted a Design Review application that was approved by the Zoning Administrator on August 4, 2006. The Design Review permit proposed no significant exterior structural changes, but rather minor design upgrades, including repairing and repainting exterior surfaces, re-striping the parking area, enhancing the landscaping and fencing, and providing a new barbeque area and trash enclosure. Regarding interior improvements, each unit will be renovated with new carpeting, tile, doors, windows, hardware, etc. Separate Water Heater and Separate Water, Gas and Electric Meters - Each unit has individual gas and electric meters. A Homeowners Association will be responsible for the water and sewer service utility meters, which will be addressed in the CC&Rs. Compliance Survey - The Applicant has completed a Housing Code compliance survey and a condition of approval is included requiring the Applicant to correct any violations prior to Final Map approval. Filing of Declarations of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) - The Project is conditioned to provide evidence that CC&Rs have been prepared, prior to approval of the Final Map. Requirements for Occupancy in accordance with the Uniform Building Code - The building was constructed in 1989 under the then applicable Uniform Building Code. The Building Division reviewed the "Property Condition Assessment Report" prepared by JCEPlHuang Consulting Engineers, Inc, and found that the Project will satisfy the Building Code requirements, subject to the conditions of approval specified in the attached draft City Council Resolution. Fire Protection Standards - The locations of existing on-site fire hydrants have the approval of the Fire Department and shall not be relocated. The Project is also conditioned to comply with current fire protection requirements. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICTS No Property within 500 feet Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council and has found no property holdings within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property, which is subject to this action. FISCAL IMP ACT There are no fiscal impacts from the preparation of this report and the processing of the Tentative Subdivision Map. All costs are covered by the full cost recovery deposit accounts. 9-6 Date, Item No.: q Meeting Date: 1-2'3-01- Page 7 of7 ATTACHMENTS 1. Locator Map 2. Planning Commission Minutes, 11/29/06 3. Noticing Documentation 4. Disclosure Statement 5. Tentative Map and Building Elevations Prepared by: Kimberly Vander Bie, Associate Planner, Planning & Building Department 9-7 ~~",. -co ..~ . --'CT -,,_... "' .-.... ~O€-" GI''' I'1'.\1-0"~"'€-"'? 1'1'1'1'- / .......\ \~~~I'\'- \ 'el-oG- :, €-,I'II- I"e,-OG, €-,I'II- I"\:>I-OG- pi.5 ",,1'-1" \'.1'", ,,-,I'll I'-€~ cl'l'E. COO \:>1-1l€-5 CTP;/ OJ - o t,. ~ ?l \...S'i. '.Ill ,~ <(1) \~ ,.\~ _..,~ ~.-,. PROJECT OCAIION R3 \:>I'-I€-I'- GI'-E.E."",€-",5 1'1'1'1'-' R3P C HULA VISTA PLANNING AND BUILDING DE PARTM E NT LOCATOR PROJECT Floil Homes PROJECT DESCRIPTION: C) APPLICANT: SUBDIVISION PROJECT 582 Arizona Sl Proposing: Condo Conversion of Twelve Three bedroom units. ADDRESS: SCALE: FILE NUMBER: A TT AO-fMENT 1 .... NORTH No Scale PCS-06-12 L:gabe fi1es\locators\pcs0612a.cdr 01.17.07 REVISED MINUTES OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA 6:00 p.m. Wednesday, November 29, 2006 Council Chambers 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 6:06:58 PM CALL TO ORDER: ROLL CALUMOTIONS TO EXCUSE: Members Present: Member(s) Absent: Cmrs. Felber, Clayton, Vinson, Moctezuma, Bensoussan, Spethman Cmr. Tripp Staff Members Present: Jim Hare, Assistant Planning Director Rick Rosaler, Principal Planner Harold Phelps, Associate Planner Luis Hernandez, Development Planning Manager ORAL COMMUNICATIONS: No public Input. 2. PUBLIC HEARING: PCS 06-12; Gonsideration of a Tentative Subdivision Map to convert an existing 12-unit apartment complex to 12 condominium units for individual ownership at 582 Arizona Street Applicant: Floit Homes. (Quasi-Judicial) Background: Luis Hernandez reported that on October 25, 2006 the Planning Commission heard and subsequently continued this item so that the applicant could have additional time to address the parking and open space issues raised at the hearing. Staff reviewed the original site plan, which was approved with approximately 6,580 sf of open space by the DRC in 1989. Minor modifications were approved during the building permit review process resulting in a reduction of open space from 6,580 to approximately 5,910 sf (projects requires 5,760 sf). Staff is of the opinion that the open space is in substantial compliance with the applicable property development standards, therefore, the two existing guest parking spaces may remain and no conversion to open space is required. Staff Recommendation: That the Planning Commission adopt Resolution PCS 06-12 recommending that the City Council approve Tentative Map PCS 06-12 based on the findings and subject to conditions listed in the draft City Council Resolution. MSC (FelberNinson) (5-0-1-1) that the Planning Commission adopt Resolution PCS 06- 12 recommending that the City Council approve Tentative Map PCS 06-12 based on the findings and subject to conditions listed in the draft City Council Resolution. Motion carried with Cmr. Spethman abstaining. 9-9 A TT ACI-fMENT 2 60 Day Tenant Notification that the Owner Intends to File an Application with the City of Chula Vistato Convert the Existing Apartments to Condominiums ! J Delores Najera 582 Arizona St., Suite 8 Chula Vista, California 90911 The Owner(s) of the buildings located at 582 Arizona St., Chula Vista, California 90911, intends to file an application with the City of Chula Vista to convert the building to a condominium. You shall be given notice of each public hearing for which notice is required pursuant to sections 66451.3 and 66452.5 of the Government Code, and you have the right to appear and the right to be heard at any such hearing. Archstone Management Consultants, LLC Authorized Agent for the Owners of the Property 12-03-03 Date C@ffiJir? Archstone Mani:tgement Consultants, LLC 710 Camino de La Reina, SUite 129 San Diego, California 92108 Phone 619-299-9194/5 Fax 619-299-9197 Email iscariatt1:U&.-.::sx.n8.t 9-10 A TT ACI-IMENT 3 - lt~,::.~;~...>tl{.1~~'ltS.>. {i~'-~li 6Di~29~'!P/~}i5f" FLOIT-PROP l"'AUL R.l.i..~l< ;..:U !iiJ1)06 i&JU05 11/16/2Q04 11;26 ~~ 8192943465 FLOIT PROP @002 CONDOMINIL'M CONVJrnSIONS- FORM B NOTICE TO l"ROSl'ECTlVE TENANT OF INTENT TO CONVERT (p1t10R TO :s::a:CCJTION OF llENTAL A.61l8EMENI) To tbe prospective Occupw:1t(s) of: 5f~ /frI2Qnc.... . ,SI- (address) (apartment if) IV The OWlI.eI(s) of !his b1rllding, at 5"4',;'{ 4/~ r f-' (llddresll)" bas filed or plilllS to :file a Desigc. Review and T~arcel Map application with the City of Chu.3 Vtsta to COllVer:! this building to a eottdomin~ project. No UIrlts may be sold :in this build!zJg unless the ronvemon is approved by tho City or Chul.a VlSta :md J.>ntil after' "- pohlic rep<m iz i~51.!lld by the Dep..rn:oent of Re3J. Estate. If you becom.e a tenant of the buil,dhlg. you shalt be given lJl)ti Cl: of ea.ob. h<=a:rlng for which notice is required pnm:r:ant to Secticus 66451.3 and 66452..5 of the GOVOIllTJ.eht Code, :m.d )'UU have the rlgb,t to appear and tlie right to be hea.....:! at any such hearing. The owner 01: (l'W 'lQ" a agent shall provide a total Off,.ye (5) ditferem llntU= ~ the approval proce$S to each tl=Iw'1t prior to the tenam vacal:ing 1he premises due to the convemion.. The City of Chula Vista wID notify eaclil NlMilt of all. t!Jre. public. hearings (Design. &mew ('.(ITn...ittee, Pl".....;"e: ~ion, Itl:Id City Cootldl) for the project lIpp!OvaL If yuu rrllwed in after the ~ bad began, the 0'\'l;In",- QJ; o~s ~:;n1.atiYe shall infunn ytm of the 0'IJUlml. lltll.tus of the project and how man ~= you will be gi~ priqo~O va<:atiog ~~ , f .~ e of owner or O\'llll""'s "tg.:nt) 2/8/0/.( T (date) :;).-. '3.0(p> (date) :J;ha~ r~ t:bis notice on (Sec:tl.:o"~7.1(a) &664~2.8 of1fle GO__Code) 9-11 180 Day Notice To Tenants Of Intention To Convert the Apartments To Condominiums And Termination Of Tenancy Government Code Section 66427.1 The following written 180 day Notice to Tenants of Intention to Convert to Condominiums and Termination of Tenancy in accordance with Government Code section 66427.1 is provided to each tenant as follows: / Delores Najera .J 582 Arizona St., Suite 8 Chula Vista, California 90911 The Owner(s) of the following described real property in the City of Chula Vista, State of California: See Attached Exhibit '}I" (commonly known as 582 Arizona St., Chula Vista, CA 90911) Hereby provides 180 days written notice of intention to convert prior to termination of tenancy due to the conversion or proposed conversion to condominiums of the real property described herein. 12-03-03 Date ~f(Y~. \:8/, 0 n ~c/ ~'-.-4d- Archstone Management Consultants, LLC Authorized Agent for the Owners of the Property Archstone Management Consultants, LLC 710 Camino de La Reina, Suite '129, San Diego, California 92108 Phone 619-299-9194/5, Fax 619-299-9197, Email iscarlatti1lOlcox.net 9-12 ..- bErnpi~t$$f it~rn~1~if:~'R .' Pri~t;ya'ur::?: "50: that. w'e:;c~" -!II' ~tt;a.ch,t.hUi:_pa: :i)',::',or on: th~J~:O,-,','J,:{~R~F,~" 1,'Art!cle.Acidre~~~~t:t9'/'""~~>::: ,;'.'.- r'eL ~ ";",'i" ^",'., .' ~'_, "'.;'o:,."",,,c ".-:c__~ ,,:Type ertifie(jI~<iik:;::,:::El~~press MaH D-RI39jst~re:9,"~,~-' :~-:?l::'~,~t~r~,: R~celpt for Merchandise '!' 0 Insured' Mail"" . :..,'q~C:.6.D.. . Compiete it~ms"1:',;2,ancf':3~ '-Aisg c'om'pje{~""P' item 4 if Restricted, Delivery is,desired~ . . Print your name and'-address on tliereverse so that we can return the_card to you. ,~{Attach thiscard.to the back of the maiJ'piece, ; ~fR:r an the front if space permits. ' . ~Artjcle Addressed to: Delores Najera ii 582 Arizona st. 8 :' Chula Vista CA 9~911 Ii -I. i: ,',' "';;:''-'' ""L',;"'" ;'--::';,;{::<:?~'::-:i' .'47~'-Restricted. D~Ut~&1~~~,E~~/"~, ..', .' , '""" ',.., ", DYes 2. "Articl~ ,N~mber:"" :~:;i~l~~~@}}! , '(Transferfrom:~ery{fi_tjJ:;{f:}jj,l?!).:t;, rS;,T.9't: :~~.1'fKf~~~~%\~~.%~1~~'f~r:"~;~ ',,,,n .IAlex Reyes .582 Arizona St. 9 !Chula Vista CA 9~911 ;.OVes 102595,02'/vH5:40 John & Kimberly Weaver 582 Arizona St. 10 Chula Vista CA 9~911 rr"""",fQ..-f.,.,,,,, <::"'"",,'" /",,,,,/1 0-1 n 11-=\ 4. Restrict G 161'>D 0002 11'>0 o Express Mail o Return Receipt for Merchandise o C.O.D. 1'>01.\0 0 Yes 2. Article Number ~\f? -~- , - P I ann n g & Building Planning Division Department Development Processing em OF (HULA VISTA APPLICATION APPENDIX 8 Disclosure Statement Pursuant to Council Policy 101-01, prior to any action upon matters that will require discretionary action by the Council, Planning Commission and all other official bodies of the City, a statement of disclosure at certain ownership or financial interests, payments, or campaign contributions for a City at Chula Vista election must be filed. The following intormation must be disclosed: 1. List the names of all persons having a financiai interest in the property that is the subject of the application or the contract, e.g., owner, applicant, contractor, subcontractor, material supplier. UJ>1J ~/:; r.... +- ~"'I /~ k,!l-I""~ . / 2. If any person' identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all individuals with a $2000 investment in the business (corporation/partnership) entity. 1/4 3. It any person' identified pursuant to (1) above is a non-profit organization or trust, list the names ot any person serving as director of the non~profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the trust. ~/fi 4. Piease identity every person, including any agents, employees, consultants, or independent contractors you have assigned to represent you betore the City in this matter. 6:r-J<ETT d L~rrl1 5. Has any person' associated with this contract had any financial dealings with an official" of the City of Chula Vista as it relates to this contract within the past 12 months. Yes_ No-X- If Yes, briefiy describe the nature at the tinancial interest the official" may have in this contract. 6. Have you made a contribution at more than $250 within the past twelve (12) months to a current member of the Chula Vista City Council? No:X Yes _ If yes, which Council member? A TT ACI-lMENT '-I- 276 Fourth Avenue 9-14 Chula Vista I Caljfornia 91910 (6191691-5101 ~!/?- -'-e- o _ _; P I ann n g & Building Planning Division Department Development Processing ellY OF CHUIA VISfA APPLICATION APPENDIX B Disclosure Statement - Page 2 7. Have you provided more than $340 (or an item of equivalent value) to an officia'" of the City of Chula Vista in the past twelve (12) months? (This includes being a source of income, money to retire a legai debt, gift, loan, etc.) Yes _ No;L- If Yes, which official** and what was the nature of item provided? Date: .:>/~ /DS-- / / ~- VAJV' HOII type name of Contractor/Applicant Print or * Person is defined as: any individual, fimn, co-partnership, joint venture, association, sociai club, fraternal organization, corporation, estate, trust, receiver, syndicate, any other county, city, municipality, district, or other politicai subdivision, -or any other group or combination acting as a unit. ** Official includes, but is not limited to: Mayor, Council member, Planning Commissioner, Member of a board, commission, or committee of the City, employee, or staff members. 9-15 l..Ij t- !~ I il z , j w , ~~ ~ ' ll: J , ;:I!Ii; ! 1 0 l.. '~; i;l~ ~I .i 3.: ~~ .. '" ~ hi :; =. : ~I <( " . -II Ii ! !j ,. . . ~ al i s l- l- <( 1'1 :,1, I;~ ! ,y, L "" !! II : '" :!l:, I . : 11111' !U;i ~ e ~~~ i!~ ~ i~~ ~~~:p ~ Q ~~1~:5" ): 'i :: ~~~ ;~~;~;.. ~ ; ~ ; I ji~ ~ ~~! !~ ~3 ~ I 9 ~ :. ..,,! gee 8 ,! dl"[" ,,1 ,I C Ie', ,', 1'1 o. I I ! lj' ; .. ~ I ~ I ~ ~ t ~ ~ g ~ 0 3 1 ;!U ~ j ~ 'i:, ' ; ~H~ ~~~!ii;; I I ~'~~~.,~~ !~~;~~f~ ~~g~U~~ , , o z ~ a ~ ~ ~d ;.J ~~:1 ;,~!; i ~ ~~ 'S ..:;~~ _ i:l []' ~j,' " ,. '! 11 ~ g~~ ~ : "~5 ~' ~ ~~ d.,.. ~~ I n, I I [ill~ [ill } '. " !;<1 a .L:. ill-:. .. " ,I, it-ri J~0 .JR , , I! r,,' 'I ~. ~i . ~ I I. " '" ~!- o Z ~ U[J} <~ ~2 z <~ I'-o~ (no ~o >z ",0 ~u ::> :r:~ ul"l I"l I~ [J} ~ "'< ~z o ~c--:; 2::C2 ~-< -< ~ Z I"l ~ --.J " ~ .~,,:-;'~,D~ , .,~ . " 0", ,. , , z.J ~" ~~ 9iz: , ~ ~~ T~ ro. ;;~ ,,'..J z,~ .0 < ~ ~~ \ \ \ , tY r' r--o....- n j I ~ I I .. ,~, ,n-,' 1 . 1 ~~~---L---,. ~i --~-~-~------~i----------- ,..... I~;:d <L I ~~.l33!:1.lS '1NOZll:lV' II ..,,"".~,\ '% 0"'....,.......... Jl<"I....";~ ~~,,;."";~/ Ii ~1 ' i ~- ! 9-16 ~ , o 0. ~ ~ 'i . ~ ~ " .. ~ <i.~ ~ ! ~ ~ 3! o Z ~ ::.Jcn -0:::. ~::> '-~ 'z -o:~ '0... ::. bo ~q >z :'18 ~~ '"""":C=:l U'" 0:; I~ (/} ~ -0:-0: ::'Z o '"N >,;:::: E: :4J -0: ~ Z '" ~ , 5 1'1.,:1 Ll i I , 0 f'I:il~;'!d,I'n" ~.~ loll ,;J! ~U~~ .lllij . ! ~ i ~ III ' 'j ~II I J~ I j' J I 1~)~I~11 'I" !=,;I !j'~ i 1 ~ 'l ... "I~ " , ~ <i:~R .. ". I I ~ ,~~ 11 ~ Q ,! I 1]111 n! :? I I~ ::. 2 lilli, lid i i~= . ~~ I ~~:~ i:~;! ~ ~ oi i ,~ F~ .. ~ ~~ ~:r ,~ i5 " ~ i ~h b e '3 e e e .tii::;;_", :>: ~ . '" ~ " t ~ 3 iH . . ~ ~~i~.~. _~~ ~~.: ., .i:;! :i~~ ~~;;~~~;~ ~: ~ ;; ~~ ~ll:; ;.t.<::~~~3..~ ~ ~ ~~ a~~ ~ ~~:iyi~.._~ h =l!-'",~- .' I ~; ~ ~~~ ~ ( 14" "lh~ ~~ ;;1, :: G..- ~~ ~~ ~:;l i-i~ i: I~ I "~" /~"l '. , ;1 , ,II' , " ; I i' , '~! ! ; !t " " C=I , G ~~: ~ j' '~ i , ..../ ~. / / / / ---/./ . '----" '. -'---)11__, ;; (.o;'-~~ I k_i~' ~ \ e,;; ~ ~, '..---- , ~ -~~ i i r ~~ ~; I, . ~l '-., J ~ , J . In ~ ' ~ ~{~ , j .,1 1 "" ~~ l 1~'1 j " g . 1'1 ~ " : ! ! I II ~ ~:5 .I unl.('\ f ~>Q l o ~ . l ~S , ':O~ g ", jI~ -G~ i ~ - f < ~ o~ ~o 0 -"', ~ ~ 0 ~ r.:~S;:SSl . :=N1lH~'f1'l ~ ,- JiS! o' 9-17 ~I ,""=J , ," z . 1'= ,- i ' I~ I , ~ ~I' c;:j I" ~I ~: I ~ ~ 1 ~ , . , __~~'lNOll't/V Cf) ::;;: :::0 Z,'l) ~= ::;;:s 0'""' Q>' z'" orj Uo E-<~ "" ~1Zl 0::= E-<:J CIl"- ~g Zo O~ N 02 -< ~ ~~.c If.'5a .,' ~i~ ;!_o. I"" ",,'~~;l ~~1; ~~i~ ..~!: l2 ".:i.:i .JL"]~ " i ~i o.~ ~~~:I ;,~ ~~~ ~ '<!~" ","iil.:l" ~Q .3 ~ ~ U ~;'!~~J~ ~~ ~~;' ~ ':!~ ~",.;...o."'g ~'" '"..~ ~ ~a ~~~~~h ~~ ~~~ ~ <!'I: o_~",o!!~::I ~'ll ~:r~ ill, ~; ;i~~~8.'Ji ':~ ;i~ 'Ij~ '"_ ~..'S.~;",,~ ~1.'1 ~,,<:1 - ~.:. ~'!i lI<"'lJz'i~ ~'1 ::'!:!~~ ;> l~ ;; ~~~Jl!~.t-;' ~~ ~g~'(i i 1!:;;iW;1 ;! !i~l , ,~t ::il- 'n~::lP:;:@!li ~'i :3:=il<;; ,."3 ;3~:i ~~~"p<'l" '! ~~r 3~~ ~~ ~~ E~ji--~:s~ I~ _ ~\1!_;;~ J~d :~ ~.' j!H~~~'h 3~~ ~;S~ '"~~: .'-!~ ~\! il~0l~~6; ~~f ~~\i;; ~;;"<: ~.'i "g ~ ;H;~!::-:j- ?-..-<a ,;~~~ ..~~~ gj ~~ ~; ~ii~~;;~ ~:~ 8~i~ ~~;~ ' 1; ~~ ~~ i'l~n!'i:Jj~~ "g:?" ".,;~~. ;j'"'::! < z :- ~; :~~~ ~~::! n~ 1;;1 ~i~1 - 3 tIJ g;;; .O"J' S,. ~ ,~ ~! .-_._ 0:) 1 c- *:U " " ;' <, " ~ , , ~ " ~ 7 ~ ~ , L__fI L_ .1~_"" .:05 .^ I i j, " ~I ~ ~1.'1 o' ~ .q;. o i~' ,~~ ,,' Il ~ '" ;~"e:~,~:' " :!:' i ~ , ____ :~::"':;:; ~;l -II g i:; ~ ~ :: Ii ~~j_-o;;u i~ . ,,; 1')~1J:~[Jlli ~ ':R'\ 9-18 illl 'II jJI ~;.:~.~Lj.i~ "' " j,,"H i!!l1l I~ bll J I I :~fJ !! , :~ fil~~ j~~!1 ~ i I j j t i! H ~ ~i , ~ I I I ;1 j I 1 J I ~ ~ ~ , I I < I < I g Ii .~ I I 8 ." " . ~ ~ ~ ,- ~ rru---I ';,i : 1 )!II( i,,~IIII!tl ~ <;-8--1 ~;1~ I .U-,> -..,~ :~:;J:ti ~ 0' a: ?5 ~ ~ ~ s ~, 0" ti: ::! ~ ~ ~ o ~ I ;1 ~I '" .~ ~ '" ~~ g . " ~:-, ,I ~ , ii , i RESOLUTION NO. 2007- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING AND ESTABLISHING CONDITIONS OF A TENTATIVE MAP TO DIVIDE INTEREST IN .45 ACRES AT 582 ARIZONA STREET FOR A ONE-LOT CONDOMINIUM CONTAINING 12 RESIDENTIAL UNITS. " I. RECITALS A. Project; Application for Discretionary Approval WHEREAS, a duly verified application for a Tentative Subdivision Map was filed on February 24, 2006, with the City of Chula Vista Planning and Building Department by Floit Homes ("Applicant") requesting approval of a Tentative Subdivision Map to convert 12 apartment units into individually owned condominiums ("Project"); and B. Project Site WHEREAS, the area of land which is the subject matter of this Resolution is diagrammatically represented in Exhibit A, copies of which are on file in the Office of the City Clerk, incorporated herein by reference, and commonly known as Chula Vista Tract No. 06-12, Tentative Subdivision Map, and for the purpose of general description herein consists of .45 acres located at 582 Arizona Street ("Project Site"); and C. Prior Discretionary Approval and Recommendations WHEREAS, the development of the Project Site has received the following discretionary approvals and recommendations: Zoning Administrative Design Review approval on August 4,2006, and Design Review approval on January 19, 1988. D. Planning Commission Record of Applications WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearings on the Project on October 25, 2006 and November 29, 2006, and after hearing staffs presentation and public testimony voted 6-0-1 to recommend that the City Council approve the Project, in accordance with the findings and subject to the conditions listed below; and E. Council Record of Applications WHEREAS, the City Clerk set the time and place for the public hearing on the Project's Tentative Subdivision Map application; and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City, its mailing to property owners within 500 feet of the exterior boundary of the project and its mailing to the current tenants residing at 582 Arizona Street, at least 10 days prior to the hearing; and 9-19 Resolution No. 2007- Page 2 WHEREAS, the duly called and noticed public hearing on the Project was held before the City Council of the City of Chula Vista on January 23, 2007, in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, at 6:00 p.m. to receive the recommendations of the Planning Commission, and to hear public testimony with regard to the same. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby find, determine and resolve as follows: II. PLANNING COMMISSION RECORD The proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission at their public hearings on the Project held on October 25, 2006 and November 29, 2006, and the minutes and Resolution resulting therefrom, are hereby incorporated into the record of this proceeding. III.COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed project for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the project qualifies for a Class I (existing facilities) categorical exemption pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Thus, no further environmental review is necessary. IV. INDEPENDENT JUDGMENT OF CITY COUNCIL The City Council has exercised their independent review and judgment and concurs with the Environmental Review Coordinator's determination that the Project qualifies for a Class 1 (existing facilities) categorical exemption pursuant to Section 15301 of the State CEQA Guidelines. V. TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FINDINGS A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66473.5 of the Subdivision Map Act, the City Council finds that the Tentative Subdivision Map, as conditioned herein for 582 Arizona Street, is in conformance with the elements of the City's General Plan, based on the following: 1. Land Use It is the City's goal to accommodate diversified housing types. The site is designated Residential-High, and was previously developed with 12 units on the property, which is consistent with the General Plan. Thus, the Project, as conditioned, is in substantial compliance with the adopted General Plan. 2. Circulation All on-site and off-site public streets required to serve the subdivision currently exist. No street improvements are required. 2 9-20 Resolution No. 2007- Page 3 3. Housing The Project is consistent with the density prescribed within the General Plan and provides attached condominium units for individual ownership. The conversion of 12 apartment units to 12 condominium units creates additional opportunities for residential ownership. 4. Open Space A. The Project includes two small recreation rooms, landscaped areas, and private patios or balconies. B. The site is physically suited for residential development and the proposal conforms to all standards established by the City for such project. C. The conditions herein imposed on the grant of permit or other entitlement herein contained is approximately proportional both in nature and extend to the impact created by the proposed development. VI. FINDINGS OF COMPLIANCE WITH CONDOMINUM CONVERSION REQUIREMENTS PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 15.56 AND APARTMENT RESIDENTIAL ZONE REQUIREMENTS PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 19.28 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUlCIPAL CODE Pursuant to Chapter 15.56, Conversion of Dwelling Units to Independent Ownership, the City Council finds that the project meets the following: A. Uniform Building Code: The Building Department reviewed the "Property Condition Assessment Report" prepared by JCEP/Huang Consulting Engineers, Inc, and found that the Project, as conditioned, will satisfy the Building Code requirements, if the required improvements are constructed or put in place. These requirements are generally described in the Property Condition Assessment Report and incorporated herein as conditions of approval. B. Storage: Section 15.56.020 requires each three-bedroom unit to have 250 cubic feet of storage. Two-stall garages underneath each unit will provide the majority of the required storage when improvements are made by the applicant who will provide two hanging storage cabinets measuring 102 cubic feet each for a total of 204 cubic feet within each garage. These must be installed prior to final inspection or occupancy of the condominiums. An additional 80 cubic feet of storage space currently provided on each second floor balcony will remain. Thus, the combined total area of storage space is 284 cubic feet for each unit, which exceeds the minimum requirement. C. Housing Code: The Project is required to conform to Uniform Housing Code requirements in existence at the time of the approval of the Subdi vision Map. The Project has completed a housing inspection and is required by condition of approval to correct any deficiencies prior to Final Map approval. D. Off-street Parking: In the R-3 Zone, a minimum of 2 open parking spaces is required for each three-bedroom unit. The project provides one 2-stall garage per unit, plus a total of two guest parking spacess. 3 9-21 Resolution No. 2007- Page 4 E. Design Guidelines: The Applicant submitted a Design Review application that was approved by the Zoning Administrator on August 4, 2006. The Design Review permit proposed no significant exterior structural changes, but rather minor design upgrades, including: repairing and repainting exterior surfaces; re-striping the parking area; enhancing the landscaping and fencing; and providing a new barbeque area and trash enclosure. Regarding interior improvements, each unit will be renovated with new carpeting; tile; doors; windows; hardware; etc. In the attached garages, storage spaces will be added for each unit. . F. Separate Service Meters: Each unit has individual gas and electric meters. A Homeowners Association will be responsible for the water and sewer service utility meters. The Applicant shall provide CC&R's prior to final map approval showing how this will be satisfied. G. The Applicant submitted a "Property Condition Assessment Report" (see Attachment F) for review by the City's Building Official. The report concludes that the existing apartment complex is in overall good to fair condition, with a few defects. The assessment identifies immediate repairs and short-term intermediate repairs. The Applicant is required to complete the improvements listed in Section 1.3, lA, and N of Attachment F and install new windows, prior to Building Permit approval. H. CC&Rs: The Project is conditioned to provide evidence of declarations of covenants, conditions and restrictions in conjunction with approval of the Final Map. VII. COMPLIANCE WITH GOVERNMENT CODE SECTIONS 66451.3 AND 66452.5 Noticing Documentation Government Code Sections 66451.3 and 66452.5 require notification of a tenant's right to a public hearing. The City of Chula Vista provided notices to tenants and surrounding property owners of all required public hearings for the Project, and the Applicant satisfied the noticing requirements at the time of submittal of the Tentative Map, including a 60-day "Notice oflntent to Convert" and "Notice to Prospective Tenants of Intent to Convert". Further notification will be provided, as required by Section 1556.040 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby approve Tentative Subdivision Map, Chula Vista Tract No. 06-12, subject to the general and special conditions set forth below. VIII. Government Code Section 66020 NOTICE Pursuant to Government Code Section 66020(d)(I), NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the 90- day period to protest the imposition of any impact fee, dedication, reservation, or other exaction described in this resolution begins on the effective date of this resolution and any such protest must be in a manner that complies with Section 66020(a) and failure to follow timely this procedure will bar any subsequent legal action to attack, set aside, void or annual imposition. The right to protest the fees, dedications, reservations, or other exactions does not apply to planning, zoning, grading, or other similar application processing fees or service fees in connection with the project; and it does not apply to any fees, dedication, reservations, or other 9-22 4 Resolution No. 2007- Page 5 exactions which have been given notice similar to this, nor does it revive challenges to any fees for which the Statute of Limitations has previously expired. IX. GENERAL CONDITIONS OF APPROY AL A. Project Site is Improved with Project The Applicant, or hislher successors in interest, shall improve the Project Site with the Project as described in the Tentative Subdivision Map, Chula Vista Tract No. 06-12, 582 Arizona S treel. B. Design Consistency The Applicant shall develop the condominium units in accordance with all applicable City of Chula Vista Design Guidelines and in accordance with the DRC-06-55 approval by the Zoning Administrator. X. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROY AL A. The conditions herein imposed on the Tentative Map approval or other entitlement herein contained is approximately proportional both to nature and extent of impact created by the proposed development. Unless otherwise specified, all conditions and code requirements listed below shall be fully completed by the applicant or successor-in- interest to the City's satisfaction prior to approval of the Final Map, unless otherwise specified: GENERAL / PLANNING AND BUILDING I. All of the terms, covenants and conditions contained herein shall be binding upon and inure to the benefit of the heirs, successors, assigns and representatives of the Applicant as to any or all of the property. 2. Applicant and hislher successors in interest shall, comply, remain in compliance and implement, the terms, conditions and provisions, as are applicable to the property which is the subject matter of this Tentative Subdivision Map and as recommended for approval by the Planning Commission on November 29, 2006, and DRC 06-55 approval by the Zoning Administrator. The Applicant shall enter into an agreement (Subdivision Improvement Agreement and Supplemental Subdivision Improvement Agreement) with the City, providing the City with such security (including recordation of covenants running with the land) and implementation procedures as the City may require compliance with the above regulatory documents. Said Agreement shall also ensure that, after approval of the Final Map, the Applicant and his/her successors in interest will continue to comply, remain in compliance, and implement such Plans. 3. Applicant shall schedule a meeting with the current tenants to present alternative rental housing opportunities and assistance in relocation in conjunction with the presentation of the schedule for the phasing of the conversion of the apartments to condominiums prior to Final Map approval. . 4. Prior to recordation of the Final Map, the Applicant shall submit evidence to the Director of Planning and Building that the following City of Chula Vista noticing forms have been 5 9-23 Resolution No. 2007- Page 6 delivered to the eXlstmg and prospective tenants pursuant to Government Code Section 66427.1, or a schedule detailing required future notifications: a. 10-day notice to all existing tenants of an application of a Public Report - "Form C" (If submitted to State Dept. of Real Estate prior to Final Map approval). b. 10-day Notice to all existing tenants of Final Map approval- "Form D". c. Notice to all prospective tenants of option to purchase/termination of tenancy - "Form E. : d. 90-day Notice to all existing tenants of option to purchase/termination of tenancy - "Form F", e. 180-day notice to all existing tenants of intent to convert/termination of tenancy - "Form G". 5. Prior to recordation of the Final Map, the location of the proposed trash enclosure shall be moved from the center of the parking lot to the rear of the parking lot, or to another location approved by the Director of Planning and Building. 6. Any and all agreements that the Applicant is required to enter into hereunder shall be in a form approved by the City Attorney. DRAINAGE & NPDES 7. All onsite drainage facilities shall be private. 8. The Applicant is required to prepare and submit a Water Quality Technical Report describing structural and non-structural Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be implemented to prevent discharge of pollutants from the project site to public storm drainage systems. BMPs should intercept runofffrom the project site and pre-treat said runoff prior to discharge to the public storm water conveyance system. Identify proposed BMP facilities to be used to treat storm water runoff from the site as part of the project Water Quality Technical Report. Said BMP facilities shall be inspected and approved by the City's Storm Water Inspector prior to final map approval. 9. The Applicant shall enter into an agre"ment to fully implement NPDES best management practices ("BMPs") to reduce the amount of pollutants entering the City's storm water conveyance system, including but not limited to: a. Installing and using efficient irrigation systems and landscape design; more specifically: 1. Employ rain shutoff devices to prevent irrigation after precipitation. II. Adjust irrigation systems to each landscape area's specific water requirements Ill. Using flow reducers or shutoff valves triggered by a pressure drop to control water loss in the event of broken sprinkler heads or lines. IV. Employing other comparable, equally effective, methods to reduce irrigation water runoff. b. Employing integrated pest management principles. More specifically, eliminate and/or reduce the need for pesticide use by implementing Integrated Pest Management (IPM), including: 1) planting pest-resistant or well-adapted plant varieties such as native plants; 2) discouraging pests in the landscaping design; and 3) distributing IPM educational 6 9-24 Resolution No. 2007- Page 7 materials to homeowners/residents. Minimally, educational materials must address the following topics: keeping pests out of buildings and landscaping using barriers, screens, and caulking; physical pest elimination techniques, such as, weeding, squashing, trapping, washing, or pruning out pests; relying on natural enemies to eat pests; and, proper use of pesticides as a last line of defense. SEWER 10. The onsite sewer system shall be private. All sewer laterals shall be privately maintained from each building and/or condo unit to the City maintained public sewer main within Arizona Street. II. The Developer/Owner shall establish a homeowners assocmtlOn to fund and oversee a contract for the maintenance of the onsite private sewer system. The frequency of maintenance of the sewer system shall be contained in the provisions of the Codes, Covenants & Restrictions (CC&Rs). The City Engineer and Director of Public Works shall approve the provisions of the CC&Rs regarding the on site private sewer system. STREETS 12. Streets within the development shall be private. 13. Remove and replace driveway along Arizona Street for compliance with ADA pedestrian access route requirements. Said work shall be done under a Chula Vista construction permit using Chula Vista Construction Standard CVCS-I for driveways. CC&R'S 14. Submit Covenants, Conditions, and Restrictions ("CC&Rs") as approved by the City Attorney to the City Engineer and Director of Planning and Building for approval, prior to approval of the Final Map. Said CC&Rs shall include the following: a. The creation of a Homeowner's Association ("HOA"), which shall, among other things, be responsible for maintaining all common facilities within the Project including, but not limited to: walls, fences, water fountains, lighting structures, fire sprinklers and alarm systems, paths, trails, access roads, drainage structures, water treatment facilities, recreational amenities and structures, landscaping, trees, streets, parking lots, driveways, and private sewage and storm drain systems. b. Language stating that the landscaping shall be maintained by the HOA in a healthy and thriving condition at all times. c. A listing of all maintained private facilities. d. Language that indemnifies and holds harmless the City from any claims, demands, causes of action liability or loss, including claims arising from the maintenance activities of HOA, including but not limited to private sewer spillage. e. The City's right but not the obligation to enforce CC&Rs. f. An insurance provision requiring the HOA to maintain a policy of comprehensive general liability insurance written on a per-occurrence basis in an amount not less than one . million dollars ($1,000,000) combined single limit. The policy shall be acceptable to the City and name the City as additional insured. 7 9-25 Resolution No. 2007- Page 8 g. The City must approve any revisions to provisions of the CC&Rs that may particularly affect the City. Furthermore, the HOA shall not seek approval from the City of said revisions without the prior consent of one hundred percent (100%) of the holders of first mortgages and one-hundred percent (100%) of the property owners, unless the Director of Planning and Building waives this requirement. h. The BOA shall not seek to be released by the City of any maintenance obligations without the prior written consent of the City and one .hundred percent (100%) of the holders of first mortgages and one hundred percent of the property owners, unless the Director of Planning and Building waives this requirement. 1. Implement an education and enforcement program to prevent the discharge of pollutants from all on-site sources into the storm water conveyance system. J. The BOA shall maintain, in perpetuity, membership in an advance notice service/system such as the USA Dig Alert Service and shall cause any private facilities of the property owners or HOA to be marked out whenever work is performed in the area. k. The CC&Rs shall include NPDES provisions for the perpetual and routine maintenance of structural BMPs, private sewer and storm drain facilities for the purpose of preventing and in such a manner as to prevent the discharge of non-storm water pollutants to the public storm water conveyance system. The CC&Rs shall include the requirement to maintain records for the past 10 years of the BMP implementation, inspections, and maintenance activities. I. Trash and Recycling program requirements shall be incorporated into the project CC&Rs to the satisfaction of the City's Conservation Coordinator. m. Said CC&Rs shall be consistent with Chapter 18.44 of the Subdivision Ordinance, and shall be recorded concurrently with the final map. n. Fire service lateral and water supply to buildings, including on-site fire hydrants, must be maintained and operational at all times to the satisfaction of the Fire Marshall. 1 S.Submit homeowners association (HOA) budget for review and approval by the City Engineer for the maintenance of private streets, storm drains and sewage systems. Said budget shall include the following maintenance activities: a. Streets must be sealed every 7 years and overlaid every 20 years. b. Sewers must be cleaned once a year with a contingency for emergencies. c. Red curbs / striping must be painted once every three years. EASEMENTS 16. All existing easements and irrevocable offers of dedication shall be shown on the Final Map. A title report dated within 60 days of submittal of the Final Map shall be submitted together with backing documents for all existing public utility easements and offers of dedication. Developer shall submit evidence of noticing to all existing public utility easement holders within the project boundaries as required by the Section 66436 of the Subdivision Map Act. AGREEMENTS 17. Applicant sh,,1I enter into an agreement wherein the Applicant agrees to the following; a. Defend, indemnifY and hold harmless the City and its agents, officers, and employees, from any claim, action or proceeding against the City, or its agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void or annul any approval by the City, including approval by its Planning Commission, City Councilor any approval by its agents, officers, or employees 9-26 8 Resolution No. 2007- Page 9 wit regard to this subdivision pursuant to Section 66499.37 of the State Map Act provided the City promptly notifies the subdivider of any claim, action or proceeding and on the further condition that the City fully cooperates in the defense. b. Hold the City harmless from any liability for erosion, siltation or increased flow of drainage resulting from this project and spillage of sewage generated by the project onto adjacent public or private streets or into offsite storm water conveyance systems. c. Maintain storm water quality treatment measures in ;accordance with an approved maintenance and inspection plan. d. Implement and sustain in perpetuity, a source control storm water quality management program as outlined in the Water Quality Technical Report. e. Ensure that all franchised cable television companies ("Cable Companies") are permitted equal opportunity to place conduit and provide cable television service to each condominium unit within the subdivision. Restrict access to the conduit to only those franchised cable television companies who are, and remain in compliance with, all of the terms and conditions of the franchise and which are in further compliance with all other rules, regulations, ordinances and procedures regulating and affecting the operation of cable television companies as same may have been, or may from time to time be issued by the City ofChula Vista. MISCELLANEOUS 18. Tie the boundary of the subdivision to the California System-Zone VI (NAD '83). 19. Submit copies of the Final Map in a digital format such as (DXF) graphic file prior to approval of the Final Map. Provide computer aided Design (CAD) copy of the Final Map based on accurate coordinate geometry calculations and submit the infom1ation in accordance with the City Guidelines for Digital Submittal in duplicate on 3 y, HD floppy disk prior to the approval of the Final Map. 20. Submit a conformed copy of a recorded tax certificate covering the property prior to approval of the Final Map. 21. Provide evidence to the satisfaction of the City Engineer of compliance with all tenant noticing requirements per Section 66427.1 of the Subdivision Map Act prior to approval of the Final Map. 22. Obtain approval of a building permit for the storage, trash enclosure, exterior and interior remodel of each condominium unit, and items listed in the "Property Condition Assessment Report" . 23. Complete all the following improvements: a. All items listed in Section 1.3, Recommended Immediate Repairs of the Property Condition Assessment t Report b. All items listed in Section 1.4, Recommended Short-Tel]TI and Intermediate-Term Repairs of the Property Condition Assessment Report c. Section N, Other Comments of the Property Condition Assessment Report, pertaining to the stair system and landscaping of the property 9 9-27 Resolution No. 2007- Page 1O d. New windows complying with the 2005 California Energy requirements 24. The Project's exterior and interior upgrades for the site shall be constructed in accordance with the approved DRC-06-55 design review permit. 25. The building permit shall provide landscaping or cabinets to shield the view of the meters in the front and side of the building from public view. 26. Provide specific detail of the design, shape, and color of the enhanced paving along the driveway and BBQ area on the landscape plan. 27. Applicant shall install two hanging storage cabinets in the existing garages each containing 102 cu. ft. for a total 204 cu. ft. within the garage area to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Building. An additional 80 cu. ft of storage space is currently being provided on the second floor deck. The combined total area of storage space is 284 cu. ft. for each unit, which exceeds the minimum requirement. The applicant shall obtain a building permit for the installation of the required storage and shall be installed prior to final inspection or occupancy of the condominiums. 28. Comply with requirements of the approved "Recycling and Solid Waste Management Plan" to the satisfaction of the City's Conservation Coordinator. The plan shall demonstrate those steps the applicant will take to comply with Municipal Code, including but not limited to Sections 8.24 and 8.25, and meet the State mandate to reduce or divert at least 50 percent of the waste generated by all residential, commercial and industrial developments. The applicant shall contract with the City's franchise hauler throughout the construction and occupancy phase of the project. The plan shall incorporate any trash enclosure re-design required for compliance with the City's NPDES permit. 29. Show that walls and ceilings meeting the current Uniform Building Code standards regarding fire and sound attenuation have been installed between airspaces of the condominium units, to the satisfaction of the City Building Official and Director of Planning and Building. If said walls and ceiling do not meet said standards, then the walls and ceiling shall be modified to conform to the Uniform Building Code. 30. Revise the landscape plan where quashed rock is proposed. 31. Repeat the walkthrough when the applicant is ready to convert. X. CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE OF CONDITIONS If any of the foregoing conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to revoke or modify all approvals herein granted, deny, or further condition issuance of all future building permits, deny, revoke, or further condition all certificates of occupancy issued under the authority of approvals herein granted, institute and prosecute litigation to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. The Applicant shall be notified ten (10) 10 9-28 Resolution No. 2007- Page II days in advance prior to any of the above actions being taken by the City and shall be given the opportunity to remedy any deficiencies identified by the City within a reasonable and diligent time frame. XI. INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION It is the intention of the City Council that its adoption of thi.s Resolution is dependent upon the enforceability of each and every term, provision and condition herein stated; and that in the event that anyone or more terms, provision, or conditions are determined by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, this resolution shall be deemed to be automatically revoked and of no further force and effect. Presented by: Approved as to form by: '.--It!r~. /L/~~ Ann Moore City Attorney James D. Sandoval Planning and Building Director H:\PLANNING\kimv\Resolutlons\PCS-06-12, 582 Arizona St. Condo Conversion.doc 11 9-29 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ~f:. CITY OF ~ -<: ..~ (HULA VISTA Item No.: 10 Meeting Date: 1/23/07 ITEM TITLE: RESOLUTION NO. OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER X (BUILDING) OF THE CITY'S MASTER FEE SCHEDULE SUBMITTED BY: REVIEWED BY: RESOLUTION NO. OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING CHAPTER XIV (PLANNING) OF THE CITY'S MASTER FEE SCHEDULE ~ DIRECTOR OF PL~G AND BUlLDlN . CITY MANAGER ;/ 4/5THS VOTE: YES NO X BACKGROUND April 2001 was the last time the Building Fee schedule was updated. November 2004 was the last time the Planning Fee Schedule was updated. Subsequent revisions to the full-cost recovery rates and departmental reorganizations necessitate fee schedule updates to ensure full cost recovery for services provided. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is not a "Project" as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines; therefore, pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is necessary. RECOMMENDATION Staff recommends City Council approve the resolutions approving the fee schedule amendments to Planning and Building fees for the City of Chula Vista. BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION 10-1 Date, Item No.: !::: Meeting Date: 1/23/07 Page 2 of 8 The Board of Appeals and Advisors recommend that the results of the building fee study prepared by staff and Maximus Inc. be incorporated into the Master Fee Schedule, with the exception that the existing subsidies for the repair of residential plumbing, mechanical and electrical systems and current fee for the installation of residential photovoltaic systems be retained as currently adopted. DISCUSSION Fee Studies and General Approach The constant evolution of rules, procedures, overhead rates and other factors necessitate the maintenance of up to date fees for development review, so that those fees reflect actual current City costs and are equitable to applicants. This is especially important in an evolving development environment as exists in Chula Vista today. For these reasons, it is important that fee schedules be reviewed frequently to ensure the correct costs are allocated to the customer. Most notable is the need to update fees is the five-year interval since the last update of Building and Inspection Fees. In April 2001, Council approved an update to a building permit and plan check fee schedule that had not previously been updated in ten years. At that time, the City was in the midst of a residential construction boom, and the change in departmental structure and increase in staff to meet demand needed to be reflected in the permit fees. Over the last two years, the value of new residential construction been on a decline, the value of new commercial construction has increased, and citywide full cost recovery factors have changed. The department hired a consultant to conduct an independent building fee study. Maximus, Inc., the selected fee study consultant, has conducted over 100 fee studies nationwide, including over 40 in California. Maximus conducted the study in concentrated interview sessions with key operational and management staff in the department to determine the actual average unit cost for all of the various permit operations. For planning fees, Maximus then applied this information to a Process Analytics Model to document the actual, full cost of activities, products and services, as well as to provide an understanding of what drives those costs. A sample of the process components is diagrammed in Table A. Table A - Process Analytics Model Components $ Expenses Pre-Application Review Application Intake Application Review Set of Conditions of Approval Review by Planning Commission Conditional Use Permit 10-2 I r Date, Item No.: ,'../ Meeting Date: 1/23/07 Page 3 of8 Thereafter, Maximus applies process times and cost data to arrive at the planning fees. For building fees, Maximus uses a proprietary model called the Nexus Model, that complies with California's legal imperatives calling for a direct relationship between fees levied and services provided. Rather than setting fees based on traditional structural valuation, the new fee is based on square footage and type of construction. Having conducted many municipal fee studies, Maximus has a substantial amount of normative data with which to compare Chula Vista, ensuring our costs were comparative to other jurisdictions within California. Locally, the current building permit fee schedule utilized by the City of San Diego was developed as a result of a study prepared by Maximus. For both building and planning fees, Maximus began by interviewing key staff in inspections, permit processing, plan review, code enforcement, development review, environmental processing and department administration. From these interviews, the consultant was able to allocate actual costs to each permit type based on the time staff spends on each activity. Available billable time was calculated by backing out vacation/holiday, training, conferences, sick leave and furlough. The Office of Budget and Analysis provided Maximus with the existing citywide overhead allocations. Cost components for the General Plan Update (10 year amortization), the Zoning Code Update (10 year amortization), Permit System Upgrade (annual) and fee study costs (5 year amortization) were included in the total costs to arrive at the productive hourly rates. Building Permit and Plan Check Fees One of the key issues in conducting the building fee study was a change in the basis of fees from the valuation of the proposed improvement to an actual full cost recovery based on the scale of the improvement. Maximus was aware of legal challenges to public agency fees which were based on building valuation methodologies, and encouraged abandonment of the use of building valuation tables in calculating permit fees. The proposed fee schedule uses building square footage, use and type of construction in the calculation of building permit fees, an approach endorsed by the Building Industry Association. Since the basis of cost allocation has changed entirely from valuation, a tabular comparison exhibit is not feasible. However, a representative comparison of the seven most typical kinds of building permits is shown below: Table 1 - Tvnical Buildin2 Permit Comnarisons Building Permit Current Permit Fee Proposed Permit Fee New House (Building Industry $ 3,412 $5,207.40 Survey Prototype) New Commercial (Building $25,566 $21,695 Industry Survey Prototype) New House (phase Production $1,351 $2,259 Typical- 2,500 sf) 10-3 I.... Date, Item No.: Meeting Date: 1/23/07 Page 4 of8 Building Permit (cont'd) Current Permit Fee Proposed Permit Fee Pool - Gunite (400 sf) $ 482.50 $1,041 Patio cover metal (300 sf) $ 175 $426 Residential Room Addition $ 972.50 $1,704 (400 sf) Production Phase - Repetitive $ 36.50 $167 Plan Check In the past, Council has subsidized (through the General Fund) three specific building permits. For reference, the currently subsidized building permits are shown in the table below: b 2 C I S b'd' d Ta Ie - urrenUv: u Sl lZe PerlDIts Building Permit Current Permit Full-Cost Permit Proposed FY05 Volume Fee Fee Fee Water Heater $34.13 $102.62 $51.31 360 Replacement Gas Line $36.25 $102.62 $51.31 219 Replacement Photovoltaic $45.00 $947.00 $45.00 2 Assuming the same activity level as FY05 for water heater replacement, gas line replacement and photo voltaic, the general fund impact of subsidization at the proposed fee level is $31,500. In the past, the reason the City has subsidized 50% of water heater and gas line permits was to not discourage residents from obtaining these permits thereby ensuring safety inspections. Photovoltaic permits have been subsidized to encourage residents to adopt alternative energy sources. As did the Board of Appeals and Advisors, staff recommends the continued subsidy of these permit types. Planning Application Fees Subsequent to the completion of the Building Permit fee study, Maximus began the Planning fee study, using the same interview methodology and factors as outlined above. This exercise not only documented the cost accounting basis for fee adjustments, but also provided the opportunity to determine the actual staff time needed to carry out the functions of processing the various planning entitlements. In doing so, staff was able to affirm that unit costs and staffmg observed the norms seen by Maximus in other California cities. 10-4 10 Date, Item No.: Meeting Date: 1/23/07 Page 5 of8 Because much of the Planning Division's development review work is handled through applicant funded deposit accounts, the impact of updated fees is not as great as was the case in Building fees. Generally speaking, these deposit accounts are established for those cases which will be heard by a board, commission or the City Council, or where a substantial environmental document is required to comply with CEQA. Further, many of the functions of the Planning Division are unrelated to development activity, and are not appropriate to be included as overhead on development applications. The key change that will result from the planning fee study is in the number of administrative application types which will be subject to a flat fee. In these instances, applying new factors resulted in the adjustments in Table 3 below. Table 3 - Pro osed Fees Convertin PLANNING PERMIT osits to Flat Fees CURENT PERMIT FEE d d d d d d d d de de de d de de osit deposit Public Rearin Extensions Desi Review - Administrative Preliminary Environmental Review Tentative Ma Fees (u to 10 lots) Tentative Ma Fees II to 50 lots) Tentative Ma Fees >50 lots) - Base Fee Tentative Ma Fees >50 lots - Per Lot Condominium Conversion Fees (u to 10 units) Condominium Conversion Fees (11 to 50 units) Condominium Conversion Fees (>50 units) - Base Fee Condominium Conversion Fees (>50 units) - Per Unit Wireless Transmission Facilities - Administrative Si Pro am A lication - Administrative Substantial Conformance Review - Minor Substantial Conformance Review - Major PROPOSED PERMIT FEE $1,127 3,932 4,640 12,886 14,576 16,070 198 12,106 14,576 16,070 198 3,689 3,555 1,040 1,825 The number of fixed planning application fees is increasing, under advice of Maxim us. Fixed fees benefit developers in that they can better predict their development costs, of which application fees are a component. The City benefits from fixed fees in that staff spends less time in collecting accounts receivable, and receives all the fees up front. The existing fee schedule is attached and marked-up to reflect a number of proposed changes to current fees. Table 4 shows the flat fees with the most significant changes. 10-5 Table 4 - t!!m leant ropose ban!!es to Existin!! Flat Fees PLANNING PERMIT CURRENT PROPOSED PERMIT FEE PERMIT FEE Conditional Use Permit - Administrative $ 1,510 $ 3,623 Variance - Administrative 1,473 3,418 Conditional Use Permit - Administrative Modification 1,510 2,825 Conditional Use Permit - Administrative Extension 195 1,127 Official Zoning Letter 85 531 S' 'ft P dC Date, Item No,: i 0 Meeting Date: 1/23/07 Page 6 of 8 In reviewing the way in which the City processes entitlements, new fees are being proposed. Table 5 lists the proposed new fees. Table 5 - Pro osed New Entitlement Fees PLANNING PERMIT CURRENT PERMIT FEE NA NA NA NA NA NA PROPOSED PERMIT FEE $1,127 3,589 D osit 2,413 D osit 138 Coastal development permits have previously been issued but no fee provision has existed. They increasingly will be required when development proceeds in the Bayfront. Mitigation monitoring is a mandatory City function when required, and is related to environmental decisions relative to specific entitlements through the CEQA process. Staff currently charge to existing entitlement deposits for this work, and segregating the costs will help staff better track this activity. Pre-application reviews help applicants organize their applications and submit proper documentation at the onset. This service is very beneficial for many applicants and over time the number and complexity of requests for pre-application reviews has increased significantly. Therefore, a new fee is proposed. Design Review Extensions are requested infrequently, but the current fee schedule does not specify this application. Rather than lumping it with "Other Residential, etc." Maximus has identified a fixed cost for extensions and staff proposes adding this new item on the fee schedule. 10-6 Date, Item No.: _ Meeting Date: 1/23/07 Page 7 of 8 Table 6 - Historicall Subsidized Plannin PLANNING PERMIT A lications CURRENT PERMIT FEE $ 175 500 240 ACTUAL COST TO PROCESS $ 736 2,726 2,234 FY06 VOLUME 16 7 7 Lar e Family Da care Permits A lication for Historic Desi ation Ap lication for Mills Act Status Table 6 identifies fees that the City has traditionally subsidized. Large family daycares provide a valuable service for households where parents must work. While they also provide a source of income for part-time employees or homeowners who might otherwise be unemployed, the income generated is not great. For the net positive impact on the community, these permit fees have been kept low. The City's historic preservation program has listed a number of historic homes through the years. In January 2005, Planning Division staff began charging fees for processing these applications, but Council directed the Planning & Building Director to waive fees on such applications to encourage homeowners to apply. Given the volume of applications last year, $38,500 was effectively subsidized by the General Fund for such applications. Some municipalities subsidize or waive historic designation applications, and others collect only upon successful application for Mills Act status, which results in the property owner receiving a reduction in property tax. Staff recommends that Council adopts the current permit fees as identified in Table 6, to help cover some of the costs necessary to process these applications. DECISION-MAKER CONFLICTS: Not Applicable: Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site specific and consequently the 500 foot rule found in California Code of Regulations Section 18704.2(a)(I) is not applicable to this decision. FISCAL IMPACT The fees recommended in this report are designed to recover the full cost of providing all planning application, building permit, inspection and plan checking services with the exception of day care centers, historic home preservation, and certain minor residential permits for the replacement or repair of equipment and/or materials that are essential to the maintenance of safe and habitable residences. The net cost to the General Fund of subsidizing these services is estimated at $70,000 annually. When compared to the current fees, implementation of the recommended fee changes in this study is estimated to result in an overall revenue increase of approximately $2.7 million annually and $600,000 for the remainder of fiscal year 2007. These estimates are based upon projected residential permit volumes of 1,200 units in fiscal year 2007 and 1,600 units in fiscal year 2008. Other permit volume including commercial/industrial development and miscellaneous permits (e.g. patio covers, swimming pools, room additions) are assumed to continue at historical levels. 10-7 ,.,.".. Date, Item No.: Meeting Date: 1/23/07 Page 8 of8 These amounts are only approximate because the actual impacts on the City's General Fund are dependent upon future permit activity, which is contingent upon unpredictable business cycles. The actual annual change in revenue may be higher or lower depending upon the actual annual permit volume realized in future years. ATTACHMENTS 1. Final Report City ofChula Vista Planning and Building User Fee Studies dtd. January 18, 2007 2. Resolution amending Building Permit Fees, with attached Master Fee Schedule changes 3. Resolution amending Planning Fees, with attached Master Fee Schedule changes Prepared by: Robert McSeveney, Brad Remp, Jim Hare, Ed Van Eenoo H:IPlanning/BobMclAI13Fee Study 2006r4.doc 10-8 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL AMENDING CHAPTER XIV (PLANNING) OF THE CITY'S MASTER FEE SCHEDULE WHEREAS, in November, 2004, the City Council adopted the existing Planning Fee Schedule; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Building Department entered into a contract with Maximus, Inc. to conduct the necessary studies to determine the actual costs and overhead expenses associated with the full array of reviews conducted, and permits issued by, the Planning Division; and WHEREAS, the comprehensive planning fee study prepared by Maximus, Inc. resulted in recommended changes to Planning Division fees necessary for the City to achieve full and equitable cost recovery for planning services provided; and WHEREAS, the amendments to Chapter XN (Planning) of the City's Master Fee Schedule will ensure that applicants pay the estimated reasonable costs of providing planning services; and WHERAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is not a "Project" as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines; therefore pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is necessary. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City ofChula Vista does hereby adopt Attachment A, amending Chapter XIV (Planning) of the City's Master Fee Schedule, on file with the City Clerk. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that, pursuant to California Government Code section 66017(a), the amendments to Chapter XIV (Planning) of the City's Master Fee Schedule shall become effective sixty days after the adoption ofthis resolution. Submitted by Approved as to form by James D. Sandoval, AICP Planning and Building Director 10-9 CHAPTER XIV ATTACHMENT A I Planninl!: A. ANNEXATION 1. Annexation Deposit The fee for petitioning the annexation of territory to the City shall be determined by the actual staff time needed to process the application, calculated at the City's full-cost recovery rate and initiated with a deposit. [Resolution 2004-378, effective 11/23/2004J B. APPEALS AND HEARINGS 1. Appeals and Requested Actions requiring public hearing a. For all appeals from actions of the Planning Commission, Design Review Committee or a request for reconsideration of an action by City Council pursuant to Chapter 19.12 or 19.14 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, the fee to the applicant shall be determined by the actual staff time needed to process the application, calculated at the City's full-cost recovery rate and initiated with a deposit. 2. f.dmimstrative foflfleals .'\flpliaat ................................... ..$350.90 3. NOH f.pplieanL^ojlpeals f.em.inistrative/Publie Hearing ........ .$350.00 R1,2,3 [Resolution 2004-378, effective /1/23/2004 C. CONDITIONAL USE VARIANCES 1. Conditional Use PermitsNariances/Modifications/Extensions (minor use) a. Conditional Use Permits - Administrative ................................... .$1,175.003,623 b. Variance - Administrative ..................................................... ...$1,130.003,418 c. Modifications - Administrative ............................................... ..$1,175.002,825 d. Extensions - Admin or Public Hearing .................................................... ...$185.001,127 Master Fee Schedule Part II - Development Chapter XIV - Planning Page 59 10-10 2. Conditional Use PermitlVariance/Modification - Public Hearing (major use) The fee to the City shall be determined by the actual staff time needed to process the application, calculated at the City's full-cost recovery rate and initiated with a deposit. [Resolution 2004-378, effective J 1/23/2004 3.CoOOitienal Use Permit Code Enforcement IIlSjlection ........... ...$3QO.00 Fee relj,lIired en all cenditienalllse pemaits and pays fur an iBitial illspectien and a felle',y lIfl inSjlectiell at 12 months te access cede eompliance. [Re5el~tien 2901 37-8, cffi:eti':e ! 1/2:i'2QQI D. DESIGN REVIEW 1. Administrative Design Review........................... ...$3,932 The fee te the City shall Be deternHned BY the actllal stafftime needed te process the application, calclllated at the City's full cost reeovery rate and initiated ',yith a depesit. [Reseh;tien 2QQ1 378, effeeti":e ! !/23/2QQI 2. Other Residential! Commercial Design Review! Public Hearing The fee to the City shall be determined by the actual staff time needed to process the application, calculated at the City's full-cost recovery rate and initiated with a deposit. [Resolution 2004-378, effective J 1/23/2004 3. Design Review Extension ...... ... ...... ... ...... ...... ... $1, 127 E. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW 1. Environmental Impact Report (EIR) application and candidate California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) findings The fee to the City shall be determined by the actual staff time needed to process the application, calculated at the City's full-cost recovery rate and initiated with a deposit. Master Fee Schedule Page 60 Part II - Development Chapter XIV - Planning 1 0-11 [Resolution 2004-378, effective Il/23/2004] 2,Use and Re'/iew of Pre 'Ii Oil sly Pr6jlarea EftyironHleHtaI DoeameHts The fee to the City shaUbe deteffiliRed by the aetual stafftime Reeded to proeess the applieatisR, eaIclllated at the City's full eost rees'/er)' Fate aIla iRitiated with a E16jlssit. (Rese/..lian 2()01 378, ejfeeti:'e ! !/23/2()()1] Jo2. Proeeasing :\fljllieatioH For f~,preliminary Environmental Review/ Initial Study,,,.,, ".$4,640 The fee to the City shaIlbe aetermiRea by the aetual staff time Reeded to process the ajljllieatioH, caleulated at the City's full eost reeo'/ei) rate aIld initiatea with a d6jlosit. [Resa/utia1l2g()1 37-8, e.ffceli';e Il/23/2()01] +'-3. Habitat Loss and Incidental Take Permit (HUT) The fee to the City shall be determined by the actual staff time needed to process the application, calculated at the City's full-cost recovery rate and initiated with a deposit. [Note: this permit will only be in effect upon U.S. Department ofFish & Game approval of City's Multiple Species Conservation Plan (MSCP)] [Resolution 2004-378, effective Il/23/2004] J.c4, Review of Consultant Qualifications for Placement on City's List of Environmental Consultants Fee: .......................................................................... ..$~541 [Re&3liltien 2{}(}1 37-8, cffceti';c ! !/23/2{}{)1} 5. Mitigation Monitoring The fee to the City shall be determined by the actual staff time needed to process the application, calculated at the City's full-cost recovery rate and initiated with a deposit. 6. Coastal Development Permits a. Administrative." ". ".." ".... ".." .,,$3.589 Master Fee Schedule Part ll- Development Chapter XIV - Planning Page 61 10-12 b. De Minimus Waiver ...... ......... ...$2.413 c. Public Hearing The lee to the City shall be determined by the actual staff time needed to process the application, calculated at the City's fUll-cost recovery rate and initiated with a deposit. F. MAJOR PLANNING APPLICATIONS 1. General Plan Amendment The fee to the City shall be detennined by the actual staff time needed to process the application, calculated at the City's full-cost recovery rate and initiated with a deposit. [Resolution 2004-378, effective J 1/23/2004J 2. General Development Plan and Modifications The fee to the City shall be determined by the actual staff time needed to process the application, calculated at the City's full-cost recovery rate and initiated with a deposit. [Resolution 2004-378, effective J 1/23/2004J 3.Plar.ned UBit De'ielepmeHts aHd Modifieatiens The fee te the City shall Be deteIH!ffied BY the fretual stafftime needed to pmeess the apjllieatieFl, ealeulated at the City's full eest feeovery rate aHd initiated with a d6jlosit. [Resel!ltien2QOI "-S, ejfceth'e! !/23/200f} 4,3. Precise Plan Approval and Modifications The fee to the City shall be determined by the actual staff time needed to process the application, calculated at the City's full-cost recovery rate and initiated with a deposit. [Resolution 2004-378. effective J 1/23/2004J *4. Sectional Planning Area Plan and Modifications The fee to the City shall be determined by the actual staff time needed to process the application, calculated at the City's full-cost recovery rate and initiated with a deposit. [Resolution 2004-378, effective J 1/23/2004J 6,5. Specific Plan Development Proposal and Modifications Master Fee Schedule Part II - Development Chapter XIV - Planning Page 62 10-13 The fee to the City shall be determined by the actual staff time needed to process the application, calculated at the City's full-cost recovery rate and initiated with a deposit. [Resolution 2004-378, effective 11/23/2004J *6. Tentative and Vesting Tentative Map Fees The fee te the City shall be detefffiiaea by the actaal staff time aeeaea to process the applicatioa, calculated at the City's full cost recoverj' rate and initiatea with a dllflssit. (Re,ehttian 2001 37-8, effceti'.'e !! 123/2001} a. Up to 10 lots .................. ...$12,886 b. 11 to 50 lots ... ......... .........$14,576 c. Base Feefor >50 lots ...... ...$16,070 d. Per/otfeefor >50 lots ......$198 7. Condominium Conversion Fees a. Up to 10 units .................. ...$12,106 b. 11 to 50 units ............ .........$14,576 c. Base Feefor >50 units ...... ...$16,070 d. Per unit fee for >50 units ... ...$198 G. SIGNS I. Signing Program Application and Modifications a. Administrative.................. ...$3,555 b. Public Hearing The fee to the City shall be determined by the actual stafftime needed to process the application, calculated at the City's full-cost recovery rate and initiated with a deposit. [Resolution 2004-378, effective 11/23/2004J 2. Sign Permits: aoa. Sign Program ............................................... .$~96 per sign Ir.b. Non-Sign Program ...................................... ...$+00-96 per Sign (Re,eIHtien 2001 37-8, effi:eti'.'e ! 1/21/20Cf} H. ZONING I. Applications Master Fee Schedule Part II - Development Chapter XIV - Planning Page 63 10-14 The fee to the City shall be determined by the actual staff time needed to process the application, calculated at the City's full-cost recovery rate and initiated with a deposit. [Resolution 2004-378, effective 11/23/2004J 2. Zoning Permit Permits for which applications are submitted prior to establishment of a new or changed use of any land or building $~48 Permits for which applications are not submitted prior to establishment of a new or changed use of any land or building $#00096 /ResahltifJ1f !835e, {Jffieu...:e 8/8/96} I. OTHER PERMITS fReeS/WRen 20Ql 3~8, effie/i':e ! !/23/2001J 1. Large Family Daycare Permits / Extensions. ....... ...................$175.00 2. Temporary Outside Sales ..................................................$~96 3. Special Events on Private Property ................................... .$1 00.0096 4. Mseile Home Lot LiRe f.djllDtmeHts (Title 25) .................... ..$200.00 5. Zoning Letter / Property Research a. Official Zoning Letter ......................................... ...$~531IltFletter b. Property research exceeding one-half (1/2) hour The fee to the City shall be $-lOO-96 per hour and is initiated with a deposit. 6. Historic Designation a. Application for Historic Designation ......................... $500.00 b. Application for Mills Act status ............................. ..$240.00 c. Historic Sign Fee ............ ...... ............ ..................$150.00 7. Records MaHagemeHt Fee ..........3?<. sf eyer)' applicatisR, $10 minimllm Master Fee Schedule Part II - Development Chapter XIV - Planning Page 64 10-15 8. Substantial Conformance Review a. Minor........................ ...$1,040 b. Major The fee to the City shall be determined by the actual staff time needed to process the application, calculated at the City's full-cost recovery rate and initiated with a deposit. 9. Violations / After-the fact Submittals The fee required for applications subsequent to a violation of Title 19 of the Municipal Code shall be double the amount that would normally be required. Such double fee shall not be construed as a penalty, but shall be construed as an added fee required to defray the additional expense of investigation and enforcement by the City as a result of failure to comply with the provisions of the title. If the normal application requires a deposit, the normal deposit is also double. 10. Wireless Transmission Facilities on City Property or In the Public Right- Of-Way a. Administrative............ ...... $3, 689 b. Public Hearing The fee to the City shall be determined by the actual staff time needed to process the application, calculated at the City's full-cost recovery rate and initiated with a deposit. 11. Public Notice Mailing List.. ....... ........ ....... ...... ................. .$50.00 per year 12. Pre-Application Review..................... ...$138/hour Master Fee Schedule Part II - Development Chapter XIV - Planning Page 6S 10-16 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL AMENDING CHAPTER X (BUILDING) OF THE CITY'S MASTER FEE SCHEDULE WHEREAS, in April, 2001, the City Council adopted the existing Building Fee Schedule; and WHEREAS, in November, 2004, the City Council adopted a revised Building Valuation Table to be used as an appendix to the Master Fee Schedule; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Building Department entered into a contract with Maximus, Inc. to conduct the necessary studies to determine the actual costs and overhead expenses associated with the full array of reviews conducted, and permits issued by, the Building Division; and WHEREAS, the comprehensive building fee study prepared by Maximus, Inc. resulted in recommended changes to Building Division fees necessary for the City to achieve full and equitable cost recovery for building services provided; and WHEREAS, the amendments to Chapter X (Building) of the City's Master Fee Schedule will ensure that applicants pay the estimated reasonable costs of providing building services; and WHERAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is not a "Project" as defined under Section 15378 of the State CEQA Guidelines; therefore pursuant to Section 15060(c)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is necessary. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City ofChula Vista does hereby adopt Attachment A, amending Chapter X (Building) of the City's Master Fee Schedule, on file with the City Clerk. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that, pursuant to California Government Code section 66017(a), the amendments to Chapter X (Building) of the City's Master Fee Schedule shall become effective sixty days after the adoption of this resolution. Submitted by Approved as to form by James D. Sandoval, AICP Planning and Building Director 10-17 CHAPTER X ATTACHMENT A Buildinl!: A. APPEALS 1. Board of Appeals and Advisors, Hearing Application The filing fee for a hearing before the Board of Appeals and Advisors shall be a deposit to cover the city's full cost including overhead. 2. Building Move, Relocation, or Demolition Appeal The fee for filing an appeal of a fmding or recommendation of the Building and Housing Department on a building move, relocation or demolition shall be one-half of the original application fee. B. CODE ENFORCEMENT 1. Nuisance Abatement: Appeal Fee The amount of the appeal fee shall be determined periodically by the City Council based upon the costs incurred by the City in processing an appeal pursuant to this chapter. The calculation shall include all costs of the City Abatement Officer, City Clerk, and the City Council but shall exclude actual costs for any work of abatement calculated pursuant to Section 9.9. 2. Nuisance Abatement: Noncompliance with order to abate The fee authorized in case of noncompliance with an order to abate shall be the City's full costs including overhead for nuisance abatement. 3. Sign Structures - Charges for moving, removal, correction or other work performed by the city The fee for moving, removing, correcting, storing or doing work on a sign or sign structure shall be the city's full cost including overhead. C. COMBINATION AND MISCELLANEOUS BUILDING, PLUMBING, MECHANICAL, AND ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEE 1. With the exception of those permits specifically listed in Sections E through I of this chapter, all fees for processing and inspecting combination and miscellaneous building, plumbing, mechanical, and electrical permits shall be eelleetea in aeeordanee with the foe sehedllle Belew as set forth in Appendix H. All other services not specificallv identified in Appendix H shall be charged at the current Full Cost Recovery rate as established annuallv bv the Office of Budget and Analvsis. Master Fee Schedule Part II - Development Chapter X - Building Page 31 10-18 TOT.'\L YALUf.TION FEE $1.00 te $2,000.00 $76.00 $2,001.00 to $100,000.00 $76.00 fer the first $2,QOQ.00 plus $7.00 fer eaeh aeffitioRal $1,OQ0.00 or fraetioR thereof, to anEl . .. ~, nn nn^ n^ , $IQQ,001.00 te $309,900.00 $762.00 fer the first $199,000.00 plus $4.25 for eaeh aElElitional $1,000.00 or fraetioR thereof, te anEl . _, " M^^ ^^^ ^^ , $300,001.09 te $590,000.00 $1,612.99 fer the first $300,000.00 pillS $3.75 for eaea aeElitioRal $1,000.00 or fraetioR thereef, to anEl . ,. ~-^^ ^^^ ^^ , $500,001.90 te $1,000,009.00 $2,362.00 for the Brst $500,000.00 plus $2.75 for eaea aaaitioHal $1,000.00 er fraetieR thereof, to anEl . ,1.~' ~,;,^^ ^^^ ^^ , , $1,000,001.Q0 aRa Ujl $3,737.00 for the Brst $1,000,000.00 pillS $U5 for eaea aaditioRal $1,000.00 or fraetieR thereef [Ordilli3lJee 28J!, ejfceti....e 91/(}1/1}]} 2. ComeiRatioR PlaR Reyie'.Y Fee a.) f. flat fee of $92.25 saall 8e eelleeteEl for the re'lie'll of eity staHElarEl plans. 8.) f. flat fee 0[$36.50 saall 86 eolleeteEl for eaeh repetiti'le plan re~/leV/. e.) Fees for HOR repetitiye plaR review shall 8e eelleeteEl iR aeeereanee v"ith the fullowiRg fee seheElHle. TOT.'\L V,'\LI)}.TION NON REPETITIVE PU_"l REVIEW FEE $1 TO $2,000 $196.50 $2,901 TO $100,000 $196.50 fer the Brat $2,000 pillS $10.50 fur eaea aaaitieRal $1,QQ9 or fraetioR thereof, to anEl iRelllEliRg $100,Q90. $100,001 te $390,000 $1,225.59 f~rthe firot $199,000 1311,15 $5.25 f~r eaeh aElaitioHal $1,000 or fraetioR thereof, te anEl iReluEliRg $309,900 $300,001 to $5QQ,QQO $2,275.50 fur the firat $300,000 pillS $4.25 fur eaeh aaaitioRal $1,000 or fraetioR thereef, te anEl iIleluaiRg $59Q,Q90 $500,001 te $I,QOO,OOO $3,125.50 f~r the first $500,000 pillS $3.5Q fer eaeh aaElitioRal $1,000 or fraetioR thereef, te ana iHeluEling $1,000,000 '" ^^^ ^^' .~ $4,875.50 for the fimt $1,QQO,OQQ 1311,15 $2.25 fur eaeh , , Master Fee Schedule Page 32 Part II - Development Chapter X - Building 10-19 I additieRal $1 ,OGG Elr HastioR !hereElf I [Ordinance 2831, effective 04/03/01] D. DETERMINATION OF VALUE The determination of value or valuation under any of the provisions of this master fee schedule shall be set forth in Appendix G. The value to be used in computing the State's Strong Motion Instrumentation Program fee 11l1ildiflg pEl_it and lmildiflg pl8.fl re'/iew fues shall be the total value of all construction work for which the permit is issued, as well as all [mish work, painting, roofing, electrical, plumbing, hearing, air conditioning, elevators, fire-extinguishing systems and any other permanent equipment. The building official shall be authorized to make minor adjustments to the valuation calculation on a case-by-case basis as the situation warrant. [Resolution 2004-378, effective 11/23/2004 E. ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES Fees for processing and inspecting electrical permits shall be as fElllews : as set forth in Appendix H. TYPE OF PERloUT FEE ,,,. $117.25 $lG1.75 $101.75 $ ss.GO $l1G.50 $135.25 $11 0.50 $ 8s.0G $ 8s.00 $ 8s.00 ~ r. TC. _L TC .L 'I' .!t The fee for residential repairs or replacements for resetting of an electric meter shall be 50% of the stated fee. These electrical permit fees only apply to individual permits. They do not apply when a combination permit fee has been collected under section C of this chapter. [Ordinance 2831, effective 04-03-01] F. HOUSING PERMIT FEES The fee for a housing permit as authorized by Section 15.20.040 of the Municipal Code shall be as follows: Master Fee Schedule Part II - Development Chapter X - Building Page 33 10-20 For each apartment house, lodging house, boarding house, group residence, hotel and motel containin - Not more than six (6) units Not less than seven (7) units but not more than ten (10 units Not less than eleven (11) units but no more than fifteen (15) units More than fifteen (15) units * plus $2.90 for each unit in excess of 15 units 78.00 106.00 127.00 *127.00 For failure to pay a housing permit fee on or before the delinquency date, the penalty shall be computed on the same basis as the penalty to be paid for failure to pay a business license tax on or before the delinquency date as outlined in Section 5.04.080 of the Municipal Code. G. MECHANICAL PERMIT FEES Fees for processing and inspecting mechanical permits shall be as fGllo'lis: set forth in Appendix H. TYPE OF PERMIT FEE D. +1.. -, , , , Pereea air er gmvity type furnaeef.Bmner (P}J.U) iReluding $83.75 auets aHa veRts* TIl_ +* $83.75 ". $83.75 Reeessea wall heater* $83.75 Ploor msuntea heater* $83.75 $83.75 CeRlIRereial. beiler $83.75 $&3.75 $&3.75 $83.75 $83.75 Ceffiffiereial '/eRtilatieR system that is RGt a portioR ef afty $83.75 . . HGea that is sery.jeed by meehanieal e)[haust ineludiRg ffiwts $83.75 Cemmereial ineineratef $83.75 . . $191.90 PGr eaeh repair, alteratioR, er aaaitioR to aft e)(istiFlg heating $83.75 applianee, refrigeratieFl unit, eeeling sr air eORditieFliHg unit, -'" , tOni-inane!! :JE3l, effceti-;e 01/0]/{}lj Master Fee Schedule Part II - Development Chapter X - Building Page 34 10-21 >Ie The fee for residential repairs or replacements for furnaces or heaters shall be 50% of the stated fee. These mechanical permit fees only apply to individual permits. They do not apply when a combination permit fee has been collected under section C of this chapter. H. PLUMBING PERMIT FEES Fees for processing and inspecting plumbing permits shall be as folloy;s: set forth in Appendix H. TYPE OF PERMIT ~_ .<L FEE Commercial raiRy;ater system ., $6g.25 $106.00 $61.50 $72.50 $72.50 $72.50 $72.50 $72.50 $72.50 $72.50 'Hater heater aaEl/er yeHt* gEm'er lateral ~- -,. ~-,: ., , , Gas JliJling system* c_ ., COlIlfficreial waste Jlretreatment intere8Jlter, inelwiiflg its tfa]3 lIRd vent, ml6eptiflg kiteflefl type grease intereepters " .. -~ ~ For eaeh resetting of a gas meter* $72.50 $72.50 [OHiinanee 283!, effeeti',.e Of/03/0!] ~-The fee for residential repairs or replacements of water heaters. gas piping or resetting of gas meters shall be 50% of the stated fee. These plumbing permit fees only apply to individual permits. They do not apply when a combination permit fee has been collected under section C of this chapter. I. PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMS The building permit fee for the installation of photovoltaic systems in residential occupancies shall be a flat fee of $45 as an incentive to promote the continued research and development of this new technology. [Resolution 2001-396, effective 11/20/01] J. NATIONAL POLLUTION DISCHARGE, ELIMINATION SYSTEM (NPDES) PERMIT FEE FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION Master Fee Schedule Part II - Development Chapter X - Building Page 35 10-22 Fees for processing and inspecting NPDES permits for new construction shall be as follows: TOTAL VALUATION COMBINATION INSPECTION/PERMIT PROCESSING FEE $88.00 for the first $100,000 plus $36.00 for each additional $100,000.00 or fraction thereof, to and including $500,000.00 $232.00 for the fust $500,000.00 plus $21.00 for each additional $100,000.00 or fraction thereof. [Ordinance 2890, effective 11/26/02J $100,000 to $500,000 $500,001.00 and up Master Fee Schedule Part II - Development Chapter X - Building Page 36 10-23 Appendix H City of Chula Vista Planning & Building Department-Building Division Consolidated Schedule of New Construction Fees. PLAN CHECK ONLY (All Construction Types) Construction Types: Construction Types: Construction Types: I FR,llFR 11, lII,Y.1 HR 1l,III,IV,Y-N Base Cost@ Cost tor Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each use Project Size Threshold Additlonal1DO Threshold Additional 100 Threshold Additional 100 Class use Occupancy TYpe Threshold Size s.f. .- Size s.f. it Size s.f. .. A-1 Theater 2,000 $2,504 $32.87 $2.087 $27,39 $1,669 $21.91 - - 10,000 $5,134 $10,01 $4.278 $8.34 $3,422 $6.67 - 20,000 $8,134 $5.33 $5,112 $4.44 $4,090 $3.55 - - 40,000 $7,200 $8.34 $8.000 $6.95 $4,800 $5.56 100,000 $12,204 $3.32 $10,170 $2.n $S,136 $2.22 200,000 $15,528 $7.76 $12,940 $6.47 $10,352 $5.18 A-2 Church 2,000 $2,481 $32.56 $2,067 $27.13 $1,654 $21.71 - - 10,000 $5,086 $9.94 $4,238 $8.26 $3,390 $8.62 - - 20,000 $6,079 $5.27 $5,066 $4.39 $4,053 $3.51 - - 40,000 $7,133 $8.27 $5,944 $6.89 $4,755 $5.51 - - 100,000 $12,096 $3.29 $10,080 $2.74 $8,064 $2.19 200,000 $15,384 $7.69 $12.620 $6.41 $10,256 $5.13 A-2.1 Auditorium 2,000 $2,435 $31.95 $2,029 $26.63 $1,623 $21.30 - 10,000 $4,991 $9.73 $4,159 $8.11 $3,327 $6.49 - 20,000 $5,964 $5.17 $4,970 $4.31 $3,976 $3.45 - 40,000 $6,998 $8.12 $5,832 $6.76 $4,666 $5.41 - - 100,000 $11,868 $3.23 $9,690 $2.69 $7,912 $2.15 200,000 $15,096 $7.55 $12.580 $6.29 $10,064 $5.03 AM2.1 Restaurant 300 $1,797 $157.23 $1,497 $131.03 $1,198 $104.82 - 1,500 $3.664 $47.91 $3,070 $39.93 $2,456 $31.94 - 3,000 $4,402 $25.46 $3,669 $21.21 $2,935 $16.97 - - 6,000 $5,166 $39.93 $4,305 $33.27 $3,444 $26.62 - - 15,000 $8,759 $15.89 $7,299 $13.24 $5,840 $10.59 30,000 $11,142 $37.14 $9.285 $30.95 $7.428 $24.76 A-3 Small Assembly Buildings 300 $1,565 $136.94 $1,304 $114.11 $1,043 $91.29 - - 1,500 $3 ,208 $41.75 $2,674 $34.79 $2.139 $27.83 - 3,000 $3,834 $22.16 $3,195 $18.46 $2,556 $14.77 - 6,000 $4,499 $34.79 $3,749 $28.99 $2,999 $23.19 - 15,000 $7,630 $13.62 $6,358 $11.51 $5,087 $9.21 30,000 $9,702 $32.34 $8,085 $26.95 $6,466 $21.56 B Banks 500 $1,594 $83.69 $1,328 $69.74 $1,063 $55.79 - - 2,500 $3,268 $25.50 $2,723 $21.25 $2,179 $17.00 - 5,000 $3,905 $13.55 $3,254 $11.29 $2,604 $9.03 - - 10,000 $4,563 $21.25 $3,619 $17.71 $3,055 $14.17 - 25,000 $7,nO $8.46 $6,475 $7.05 $5,180 $5.64 50,000 $9885 $19.77 $8,238 $16.48 $6,590 $13.18 B Laundromat 200 $1,275 $167.37 $1,063 $139.48 $850 $111.58 - 1,000 $2,614 $51.00 $2,179 $42.50 $1,743 $34.00 - 2,000 $3,124 $27.09 $2,604 $22.58 $2,083 $18.06 - - 4,000 $3,666 $42.50 $3,055 $35.42 $2,444 $28.33 - 10,000 $6,216 $16.89 $5,180 $14.08 $4,144 $11.26 20,000 $7 905 $39.53 $6,588 $32_94 $5,270 $26.35 B Medical Office 2,000 $2,295 $30.12 $1,813 $25.10 $1,530 $20.08 - - 10,000 $4,705 $9.18 $3,921 $7.65 $3,137 $6.12 - 20,000 $5,623 $4.88 $4,686 $4.07 $3,749 $3.26 - 40,000 $6,600 $7.66 $5,500 $6.38 $4,400 $5.11 100,000 $11,196 $3.04 $9,330 $2.53 $7,464 $2.02 200,000 $14,232 $7.12 $11,860 $5.93 $9,488 $4.74 MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 1 of 24 1/18/07 -1:19 PM 10-24 Appendix H City of Chula Vista Planning & Building Department-Building Division Consolidated Schedule of New Construction Fees - PLAN CHECK ONLY (All Construction Types) Construction Types: Construction "TYpes: Construction Types: I FR,IIFR 1I,III,V-1 HR 1I,III,IV,V-N Sase Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each UBC Project Size Threshold Additional 1 00 Threshold AddlUonal100 Threshold AdditionaliDO Class UBe OccuDancv 'flip. Threshold Size s.f. . Slz. s.f.* Size s.f. '" B Offices 2.000 $2,272 $29.83 $1,894 $24.86 $1,515 $19.8a - 10,000 $4,858 $9.10 $3,882 $7.58 $3,106 $6.06 - - 20,000 $5,568 $4.82 $4,640 $4.02 $3,712 $3.22 - - 40,000 $6,533 $7.57 $5,444 $6.31 $4,358 $5.05 - - 100,000 $11,076 $3.01 $9,230 $2.51 $7,384 $2.01 200,000 $14,088 $7.04 $11,740 $5.87 $9,392 $4.70 B Hioh Rise Office Building 15,000 $13.354 $23.37 $11,129 $19.48 $8,903 $15,58 - - 75.000 $27,378 $7.13 $22.815 $5,94 $18,252 $4.75 - - 150,000 $32,724 $3.79 $27,270 $3.16 $21,816 $2.53 - 300,000 $38,412 $5.92 $32,010 $4.94 $25,608 $3.95 - 750,000 $65,070 $2.36 $54,225 $1.97 $43,380 $1.58 1,500,000 $82,800 $5.52 $69,000 $4.60 $55,200 $3.68 B Hlcrh Rise condo Building 15,000 $13,354 $23.37 $11,129 $19.48 $8,903 $15.58 - - 75,000 $27,378 $7.13 $22,815 $5.94 $18,252 $4.75 - - 150,000 $32,724 $3.79 $27,270 $3.16 $21,816 $2.53 - - 300,000 $38,412 $5.92 $32,010 $4.94 $25,608 $3.95 - - 750.000 $65,070 $2.36 $54,225 $1.97 $43,380 $1.58 1 500,000 $82 800 $5.52 $69,000 $4.60 $55,200 $3.68 E-1 Preschool/School 300 $1,681 $147.08 $1,401 $122.56 $1,121 $98.05 - 1,500 $3,446 $44.84 $2,872 $37.36 $2,297 $29.89 - 3,000 $4,118 $23.82 $3.432 $19.85 $2,746 $15.88 - - 6,000 $4,833 $37.35 $4,028 $31.13 $3,222 $24.90 - - 15,000 $8,195 $14.85 $6,829 $12.38 $5,463 $9.90 30,000 $10,422 $34.74 $8,685 $28.95 $6,948 $23,16 E-2 Preschool/School 300 $1,681 $147.08 $1.401 $122.56 $1,121 $98.05 - - 1,500 $3.446 $44.84 $2,872 $37.36 $2,297 $29.89 - 3,000 $4,118 $23,82 $3,432 $19.85 $2,746 $15.88 - - 6,000 $4,833 $37.35 $4,028 $31.13 $3,222 $24.90 - - 15,000 $8,185 $14.85 $6,829 $12.38 $5,463 $9.90 30,000 $10,422 $34.74 $8,685 $28.95 $8,948 $23.16 E-3 Da~are 300 $1,681 $147.08 $1,401 $122.56 $1,121 $98.05 - 1,500 $3,446 $44.84 $2,872 $37.36 $2,297 $29.89 - - 3,000 $4,118 $23.82 $3,432 $19.85 $2,748 $15.88 - - 8,000 $4,833 $37.35 $4,028 $31.13 $3,222 $24.90 - - 15,000 $8,195 $14.85 $6,829 $12.38 $5,463 $9.90 30,000 $10,422 $34.74 $8,685 $28.95 $6,948 $23.16 F-1 Industrial/Manufacturing 1,000 $1,623 $42.60 $1,353 $35.50 $1,082 $28.40 - 5,000 $3,327 $13.00 $2,773 $10.83 $2,218 $8.66 - - 10,000 $3,977 $6.89 $3,314 $5.74 $2,651 $4.59 - - 20,000 $4,666 $10.83 . $3,888 $9.02 $3,110 $7.22 - 50,000 $7,914 $4.31 $6,595 $3.59 $5,276 $2.87 100,000 $10,068 $10.07 $8,390 $8.39 $6,712 $6.71 F-2 Heavy JndusbiaJ 2,000 $2,203 $28.91 $1,836 $24.09 $1,468 $19.27 - - 10,000 $4,516 $6.82 $3,763 $7.35 $3,010 $5.88 - 20,000 $5,398 $4.67 $4,498 $3.89 $3,598 $3.11 - - 40,000 $6,331 $7.35 $5,276 $6.12 $4,221 $4.90 - - 100,000 $10,740 $2.92 $8,950 $2.43 $7,160 $1.94 200,000 $13,656 $6.83 $11,380 $5.69 $9,104 $4.55 MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 2 of 24 1/18/07 -1:19 PM 10-25 Appendix H City of Chula Vista Planning & Building Department-Building Division Consolidated Schedule of New Construction Fees - PLAN CHECK ONLY (All Construction Types) Construction Types: Construction Types: Construction Types: I FR, II FR II,lII,V-1 HR lI.lII,IV,V-N Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each UBC UBe Occuoancy TYoe Project Size Threshold Additional1QO Threshold Additional 100 Threshold Additional 100 Class Threshold Size s.f. " SI~8 s.f. " Size s.f. " H.1 High Explosion Hazard 500 $1,252 $65.74 $1,043 $54.78 $835 $43.83 . . 2,500 $2,567 $20.02 $2,139 $16.68 $1,71' $13.34 . 5,000 $3,067 $10.66 $2.556 $8.88 $2.045 $7.10 . . 10,000 $3,600 $16.70 $3,000 $13.92 $2,400 $11.13 - 25,000 $6,105 $6.64 $5,088 $5.53 $4,070 $4.42 50,000 $7,764 $15.53 $6,470 $12.94 $5,176 $10.35 H.2 Moderate Explosion Hazard 1,000 $1,739 $45.64 $1,449 $38.04 $1,159 $30.43 . 5,000 $3,565 $13.91 $2,971 $11.59 $2,376 $9.27 . 10,000 $4,260 $7.39 $3,550 $6.16 $2,840 $4.93 - . 20,000 $4,999 $11.60 $4,166 $9.66 $3,333 $7.73 - - 50,000 $8,478 $4.60 $7,065 $3.83 $5,652 $3.06 100,000 $10,776 $10.78 $8,980 $8.98 $7,184 $7.18 H.3 High Fire Hazard 1,000 $1,739 $45.64 $1,449 $38.04 $1,159 $30.43 . . 5,000 $3,565 $13.91 $2,971 $11.59 $2,376 $9.27 - . 10,000 $4.260 $7.39 $3,550 $6.16 $2,84() $4.93 - - 20,000 $4,999 $11.60 $4,166 $9.66 $3.333 $7.73 . . 50,000 $8,478 $4.60 $7,065 $3.B3 $5,652 $3.06 100,000 $10.776 $10.78 sa.980 $8.98 $7,184 $7.18 H-4 Repair Garace 300 $1,252 $109.55 $1,043 $91.29 $835 $73.03 - - 1,500 $2,567 $33.40 $2,139 $27.83 $1,711 $22.26 - 3,000 $3,068 $17.72 $2,556 $14.77 $2,045 $11.82 - 6,000 $3,599 $27.83 $2,999 $23.19 $2,400 $18.55 - - 15,000 $6,104 $11.05 $5,087 $9.21 $4,069 $7.37 30,000 $7,762 $25.87 $6,468 $21.56 $5.174 $17.25 H.5 Aircraft Hanaer/Repairs 1,000 $1,043 $27.39 $870 $22.83 $696 $18.26 - - 5,000 $2,139 $8.34 $1,783 $6.95 $1,426 $5.56 - . 10,000 $2,556 $4.44 $2,130 $3.70 $1.704 $2.96 - 20,000 $3,000 $6.95 $2,500 $5.79 $2,000 $4.63 50,000 $5,085 $2.76 $4,238 $2.30 $3,390 $1.84 100,000 $6,465 $6.47 $5,388 $5.39 $4,310 $4.31 H-6 Semiconductor Fabrication 1,000 $1,785 $46.87 $1,488 $39.06 $1,190 $31.24 - . 5,000 $3,660 $14.28 $3,050 $11.90 $2,44() $9.62 . . 10,000 $4,374 $7.60 $3,645 $6.33 $2,916 $5.06 . 20,000 $5,134 $11.91 $4,278 $9.92 $3,422 $7.94 . . SO,OOO $8,706 $4.72 $7,255 $3.93 $5,804 $3.14 100,000 $11,064 $11.06 $9,220 $9.22 $7,376 $7.38 H-7 Health Hazard Materials 500 $1,461 $76.68 $1,217 $63.90 $974 $51.12 . . 2.500 $2,994 $23.39 $2,495 $19.49 $1,996 $15.59 - . 5.000 $3,579 $12.42 $2,983 $10.35 $2.386 $8.28 . 10,000 $4,200 $19.48 $3,500 $16.23 $2,800 $12.99 . . 25,000 $7,122 $7.73 $5,935 $6.44 $4,748 $5.15 50,000 $9,054 $18.11 $7,545 $15.09 $6.036 $12.07 ]-1.1 Nursery. Full-lime (5+) 200 $1,252 $164.33 $1,043 $136.94 $835 $109.55 - - 1,000 $2,567 $50.08 $2.139 $41.73 $1,711 $33.38 - . 2,000 $3,067 $26.50 $2,556 $22.17 $2,045 $17.74 - - 4,000 $3,600 $41.73 $3,000 $34.77 $2,400 $27.82 - . 10,000 $6,103 $16.58 $5,086 $13.82 $4,069 $11.06 20,000 $7,762 $38.81 $6,468 $32.34 $5,174 $25.87 MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 3 of 24 1/18/07 -1:19 PM 10-26 Appendix H City 01 Chula Vista Planning & Building Department-Bui/ding Division Consolidated Schedule of New Construction Fees - PLAN CHECK ONLY (All Construction Types) Construction Types: Construction Types: Construction Types: IFR,IIFR II, III, V~1 HR II, III, lV,V-N Base Cost @ Cost for Each Bas. Cost @ Cost for Each Bas. Cost @ Cost for Each UBC use Occucancv TvDe Project Size Threshold Additional 100 Threshold Additional 1 00 Threshold Additional 100 Class Threshold Size s.f. .. Size s.,. it Size s.f. .. 1-1.2 Health Care Centers 500 $1,438 $75.47 $1.198 $62.89 $958 $50.31 . . 2,500 $2,947 $23.00 $2,456 $19.17 51,965 $15.34 . . 5.000 $3,522 $12.22 $2,935 $10.18 $2,348 $8.14 . 10,000 $4,133 $19.17 $3,444 $15.97 $2,755 $12.78 . . 25,000 $7,008 $7.61 $5.840 $6.34 $4,672 $5.07 50,000 $8,910 $17.82 $7,425 $14.85 55,940 $11.88 '.2 NursinG Home/Assisted Livino 250 $1.252 $131.46 51,043 $109,55 5835 $87.64 . . 1,250 $2,567 $40.07 52,139 $33.39 51,711 $26.71 . 2,500 $3,068 $21.28 $2,556 $17.73 $2,045 $14.18 . . 5,000 $3,599 $33.39 $3,000 $27.82 $2,400 $22.26 . . 12,500 $6,104 $13.28 $5,088 $11.07 $4,069 $8.86 25,000 $7,764 $31.06 $6,470 525.88 $5,176 520.70 1-3 Mental Hospital/Jail 2,500 $3,942 $41.39 $3,285 534.49 52,628 527.59 . . 12,500 $8,081 $12.61 $6,734 $10.51 $5,387 $8.41 . . 25,000 $9,657 $6.71 $8,048 $5.59 $6,438 $4.47 . . 50,000 $11,334 $10.51 $9,445 $8.76 57,556 $7.01 . . 125,000 $19,215 $4.19 $16,013 $3.49 $12,910 52.79 250,000 $24,450 $9.78 $20,375 $8.15 $16,300 56.52 M Stores (Retail) 2,500 $2,753 $28.91 $2,294 $24.09 $1,836 $19.27 . - 12,500 $5,644 $8.82 $4,703 $7.35 $3,763 $5.88 . . 25,000 56,746 $4.67 $5,622 $3.89 $4,498 $3.11 . 50,000 $7,913 57.35 $6,594 56.13 $5,275 $4.90 . . 125,000 $13,425 $2.91 $11,188 $2.43 $8,950 $1.94 250,000 $17,063 $6.83 $14,219 $5.69 $11,375 $4.55 M Market 2,500 $2,753 $28.91 $2,294 $24.09 $1,836 $19.27 . . 12,500 $5,644 $8.82 $4,703 $7.35 $3,763 55.88 . 25,000 $8,748 $4.67 $5,622 53.89 $4,498 $3.11 . . 50,000 57,913 57.35 $6,594 $8.13 55,275 $4.90 . . 125,000 $13,425 $2.91 $11,188 $2.43 $8,950 51.94 250,000 $17,063 $6.83 $14,219 $5.69 $11,375 $4.55 R.1 Apartment Bldg 800 $3,198 $104.60 $2,857 $87.17 52,125 569.73 . . 4,000 $8,535 $31.89 $5,448 $25.56 $4,357 521.26 . 8,000 $7,811 $16.94 $6,509 $14.11 $5,207 $11.29 . . 16,000 $9,166 $26.56 57,638 $22.13 $6,110 $17.71 . . 40,000 $15,540 $10.56 $12,950 $8.80 $10,360 $7.04 80,000 $19,764 $24.71 $16470 $20.59 $13,176 $18.47 R.1 Apartment Bldg ~ Repeat Unit 800 $102 $3.35 $85 $2.79 $68 52.23 . . 4,000 5209 $1.01 $174 $0.84 $140 $0.67 . . 8,000 $250 $0.55 $208 $0.46 $166 $0.37 . 16,000 $294 $0.86 5245 $0.71 $196 $0.57 . . 40,000 $499 $0.34 $416 50.28 $333 $0.22 80,000 5834 $0.79 5528 $0.66 $422 $0.53 R.1 Hotels & Motels 5,000 52,759 $14.48 $2,300 $12.07 51,840 $9.65 . . 25,000 $5,655 $4.43 $4,713 $3.69 $3,770 $2.95 . . SO,OOO $6,762 $2.34 $5,835 51.95 $4,508 $1.56 . . 100,000 $7,932 $3.67 $6,610 $3.06 55,288 $2.45 . . . 250,000 $13,440 $1.46 $11,200 $1.22 $8,960 50.98 500,000 $17,100 $3.42 $14,250 $2.85 $11,400 $2.29 MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 4 0124 1/18/07.1:19 PM 10-27 Appendix H City of Chula Vista Planning & Building Department-Building Division Consolidated Schedule of New Construction Fees. PLAN CHECK ONLY (All Construction Types) Construction Types: Construction Types: Construction Types: I FR,IIFR 1I,III,V-1 HR II,III,IV,V-N Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each UBC Project Size Threshold Additional 100 Threshold Additional 1 00 Threshold Additional 1 00 Class use Occupancy Type Threshold Sin s.t. . SIze s.t. . Size s.t. . R-1 Hotels & Motels. Phased Permits 5,000 $3,664 $19.23 $3,053 $16.02 $2.442 $12.82 - - 25,000 $7,509 $5.B7 $6,258 $4.89 $5,006 $3.91 - - 50,000 $8,976 $3.12 $7,480 $2.60 $5,984 $2.08 - - 100,000 $10,536 $4.BB $8,780 $4.06 $7,024 $3.25 - - 250,QOO $17,850 $1.96 $14,875 $1.63 $11,900 $1.30 500,000 $22,740 $4.55 $18,950 $3,79 $15,160 $3.03 R-3 Dwellinas - Custom 1,500 $2,698 $28.42 $2,249 $23.58 $1,799 $18.95 - - 2,500 $2,982 $42.59 $2,485 $35.49 $1,988 $28.40 - 3,500 $3,408 $23.68 $2,840 $19.73 $2,272 $15.79 - 5,000 $3,764 $9.47 $3,138 $7.89 $2,509 $6.31 - 8,000 $4,048 $18.26 $3,373 $15.22 $2,698 $12.17 15,000 $5,326 $35.51 $4,408 $29.59 $3,551 $23.67 R-3 Dwellings - Madej 1,500 $3,053 $28.39 $2,544 $23.56 $2,036 $18.93 - - 2,500 $3,337 $28.43 $2,781 $23.69 $2,225 $18.96 - - 3,500 $3,621 $23.57 $3,018 $19.73 $2,414 $15.78 - - 5,000 $3,977 $9.45 $3,314 $7.88 $2,651 $6.30 - - 8,000 $4,260 $17.25 $3,550 $14.38 $2,840 $11.50 15,000 $5,468 $36.45 $4,556 $30.38 $3,645 $24.30 R-3 Dwellinas - Production Phase 1,500 $250 $0.01 $208 $0.01 $167 $0.01 - of Master Plan 2,500 $250 -$0.02 $208 ..$0.02 $167 -$0.01 - I (repeats) 3,500 $250 $0.94 $208 $0.78 $167 $0.63 - 5,000 $264 $0.00 $220 $0.00 $176 $0.00 - 8,000 $264 $0.21 $220 $0.18 $176 $0.14 15,000 $279 $1.B6 $233 $1.55 $185 $1.24 R-3 Dwellinas - Alternate Materials 1,500 $2,911 $56.80 $2,426 $47.33 $1,941 $37.87 - 2,500 $3,479 $14.22 $2,899 $11.85 $2,320 $9.48 - - 3,500 $3,621 $23.67 $3,018 $19.73 $2,414 $15.78 - - 5,000 $3,977 $42.61 $3,314 $35.51 $2,651 $28.41 - 8,000 $5,255 $4.07 $4,379 $3.39 $3,503 $2.71 15,000 $5 ,540 $36.93 $4,616 $30.78 $3,693 $24.62 R-2.1, Group Care, Nan-Amb. (6+) 2,000 $2,295 $30.12 $1,913 $25.10 $1,530 $20.08 2.3&6.1 - 10,000 $4,705 $9.18 $3,921 $7.65 $3,137 $6.12 - - 20,000 $5,623 $4.88 $4,686 $4.07 $3,749 $3.26 - - 40,000 $6,600 $7.66 $5,500 $6.38 $4,400 $5.11 - - 100,000 $11,196 $3.04 $9,330 $2.53 $7,464 $2.02 200,000 $14,232 $7.12 $11,860 $5.93 $9,488 $4.74 R-2.2 & Group Care, Ambulatory (6+) 2,000 $2,295 $30.12 $1,913 $25.10 $1,530 $20.08 6.20 - 10,000 $4,705 $9.18 $3,921 $7.65 $3,137 $6.12 - 20,000 $5,623 $4.B8 $4,686 $4.07 $3,749 $3.26 - - 40,000 $6,600 $7.56 $5,500 $6.38 $4,400 $5.11 - - 100,000 $11,196 $3.04 $9,330 $2.53 $7,464 $2.02 200,000 $14,232 $7.12 $11,860 $5.93 $9,488 $4.7. R-2.1.1, Group Cara, Non-Amb. (1-51 200 $1,101 $144.54 $918 $120.45 $734 $96.36 2.3.1 & 1,000 $2,258 $44.06 $1,881 $36.71 $1,505 $29.37 6.1.1 2,000 $2,698 $23.40 $2,249 $19.50 $1,799 $15.60 - 4,000 $3,166 $36.71 $2,639 $30.59 $2,111 $24.47 - 10,000 $5,369 $14.60 $4,474 $12.16 $3,579 $9.73 20,000 $6,828 $34.14 $5,690 $26.45 $4,552 $22.76 MAXIMU5, Inc. Page 5 of 24 1/18/07 -1:19 PM 10-28 Appendix H City of Chula Vista Planning & Building Department-Building Division Consolidated Schedule of New Construction Fees - PLAN CHECK ONLY (All Construction Types) Construction Types; Construction Types: Construction Types: I FR,IIFR 11,II1,V-1 HR II,III,IV,V-N Base Cost @ Cost far Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each UBC Project Size Threshold AdditlonaliDO Threshold AddlUonal1QO Threshold Additional 100 Class use Occupancy TVrle Threshold Siz. s.l. .. Size s.f. * Size s.f. .. R-2.2.1 & Group Care,Amb. (1-5) 200 $1.101 $144.54 $918 $120.45 $734 $96.36 6.2.1 - 1,000 $2,258 $44.06 $1,881 $36.71 $1,505 $29.37 . - 2.000 $2.698 $23.40 $2.249 $19.50 $1,799 $15.60 - - 4,000 $3,166 $36.71 $2,639 $30.59 $2.111 $24.47 - - 10,000 $5.369 $14.60 $4.474 $12.18 $3,579 $9.73 20,000 $6,828 $34.14 $5,690 $28.45 $4,552 $22.76 S-1 Moderate Hazard Storaoe 1,000 $1,762 $46.26 $1,468 $38.55 $1.175 $30.84- - - 5,000 $3,613 $14.10 $3,011 $11.75 $2,408 $9.40 - - 10,000 $4,318 $7.49 $3,598 $6.24 $2,878 $4.99 . - 20,000 $5,066 $11.75 $4,222 $9.79 $3,378 $7.83 - - 50,000 $8,592 $4.68 $7,160 $3.88 $5,728 $3.10 100,000 $10,920 $10.92 $9,100 $9.10 $7,280 $7.28 S-1 Self Storaae 2,000 $1,739 $22.83 $1,449 $19.02 $1,159 $15.22 - - 10,000 $3,565 $6.95 $2,971 $5.79 $2,3n $4.63 - - 20,000 $4,280 $3.71 $3,550 $3.09 $2,840 $2.47 - - 40,000 $5,002 $5.78 $4,168 $4.82 $3,334 $3.86 - - 100,000 $8,472 $2.30 $7,060 $1.92 $5,648 $1.54 200,000 $10,n6 $5.39 $8,980 $4.49 $7,184 $3.59 S-2 Low Hazard Storage 1,000 $1,530 $40.18 $1,275 $33.47 $1,020 $26.78 . - 5,000 $3,137 $12.24 $2,614 $10.20 $2,091 $8.16 - - 10,000 $3,749 $6.50 $3,124 $5.42 $2,499 $4.34 - - 20,000 $4,399 $10.20 $3,666 $8.50 $2,933 $6.80 - - 50,000 $7,458 $4.07 $6,215 $3.39 $4,972 $2.71 100,000 $9,492 $9.49 $7,910 $7.91 $8,328 $6.33 S-3 Repair Garage 1,000 $1,530 $40.16 $1,275 $33.47 $1,020 $26.78 - not H-4) 5,000 $3,137 $12.24 $2,614 $10.20 $2,091 $8.16 - - 10,000 $3,749 $6.50 $3,124 $5.42 $2,499 $4.34 - - 20,000 $4,399 $10.20 $3,666 $8.50 $2,933 $8.80 . - 50,000 $7,458 $4.07 $6,215 $3.39 $4.972 $2.71 100.000 $9,492 $9.49 $7.910 $7.91 $6,328 $6.33 S-3 Fuel Dispensing CanolW 100 $985 $258.66 $821 $215.55 $857 $172.44 - . 500 $2,020 $78.84 $1,683 $65.70 $1.347 $52.56 - - 1.000 $2,414 $41.87 $2,012 $34.89 $1,610 $27.91 - - 2,000 $2.833 $85.70 $2.361 $54.75 $1,889 $43.80 - - 5,000 $4.804 $26.12 $4,003 $21.76 $3,203 $17.41 10000 $6,110 $61.10 $5,091 $50.91 $4.073 $40.73 S-3 Parking Garage 1,000 $1.669 $43.83 $1,391 $36.52 $1,113 $29.22 - . 5,000 $3,422 $13.34 $2,852 $11.12 $2.282 $8.90 - - 10,000 $4,090 $7.10 $3,406 $5.92 $2.728 $4.74 - - 20,000 $4,800 $11.12 $4,000 $9.27 $3,200 $7.41 - - 50,000 $8.136 $4.44 $6.780 $3.70 $5,424 $2.96 100,000 $10,356 $10.36 $8,630 $6.63 $6,904 $6.90 S4 Open Parking Garage 1,000 $1,669 $43.83 $1,391 $36.52 $1,113 $29.22 - - 5,000 $3,422 $13.34 $2,852 $11.12 $2,282 $8.90 - - 10,000 $4.090 $7.10 $3,408 $5.92 $2,726 $4.74 - - 20,000 $4,800 $11.12 $4,000 $9.27 $3.200 $7.41 - 50.000 $8,136 $4.44 $6,780 $3.70 $5,424 $2.96 100,000 $10.356 $10.36 $8,630 $8.63 $6,904 $6.90 MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 6 of 24 1/18/07 -1:19 PM 10-29 Appendix H City of Chula Vista Planning & Building Department-Building Division Consolidated Schedule of New Construction Fees - PLAN CHECK ONLY (All Construction Types) Construction Types: Construction Types: Construction Types: IFR,IIFR II, III,V.1 HR lI,m, IV, V.N Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each UBC use Occuoancv 'TYoe Project Size Threshold Additional 100 Threshold Additional 100 Threshold Addltlonal10Q Class Threshold Size sJ. .. Size s.t. .. Slzo s.f. .. 5-5 Aircraft Hanger & Helistops SOO $1,159 $60.86 $966 $50.71 $773 $40.57 - - 2,500 $2.376 $18.56 $1,980 $15.46 $1.584 $12.37 - - 5,000 $2,840 $9.86 $2,367 $8.21 $1,894 $6.57 - - 10,000 $3,333 $15,40 $2,na $12.88 $2.222 $10.30 - - 25,000 $5,651 $6.14 $4,709 $5.11 $3,768 $4.09 50,000 $7,185 $14.37 $5,988 $11.98 $4,790 $9.58 U-1 Private Garaoes/Accessorv Buildings 100 $754 $197.81 $628 $164,84 $502 $131.87 - - 500 $1,545 $60.28 $1,287 $50.24 $1,030 $40.19 - - 1,000 $1,846 $32.01 $1,539 $26.68 $1,231 $21.34 - 2,000 $2,186 $50.24 $1,805 $41.87 $1,444 $33.49 - 5,000 $3,674 $19.98 $3,061 $16.65 $2,449 $13.32 10,000 $4,673 $46.73 $3,894 $38.94 $3,115 $31.15 1-2 Convalescent Hospital 200 $1,565 $205.41 $1,304 $171.18 $1,043 $136.94 - 1,000 $3,208 $62.59 $2,674 $52.16 $2,139 $41.73 - 2,000 $3,834 $33.26 $3,195 $27.71 $2,556 $22.17 - 4,000 $4,499 $52.16 $3,750 $43.47 $3,000 $34.n - 10,000 $7,629 $20.73 $6,358 - $17.28 $5,086 $13.82 20,000 $9 702 $48.51 $8,085 $40.43 $6,468 $32.34 A Restaurant TI 300 $1,449 $126.80 $1,208 $105.67 $966 $84.53 - - 1,500 $2,971 $38.66 $2,476 $32.21 $1,980 $25.77 - 3,000 $3,551 $20.52 $2,959 $17.10 $2,367 $13.68 - 6,000 $4,166 $32.21 $3,472 $26.84 $2,777 $21.47 - - 15,000 $7,065 $12.81 $5,888 $10.68 $4,710 $8.54 30,000 $8,987 $29.96 $7,489 $24.96 $5,991 $19.97 B Office Tenant Improvement 300 $1,217 $106.52 $1,014 $88.77 $812 $71.01 - 1,500 $2,495 $32.45 $2,080 $27.04 $1,884 $21.63 - 3,000 $2,982 $17.24 $2,485 $14.36 $1,988 $11.49 - 6,000 $3,499 $27.05 $2,916 $22.54 $2,333 $18.03 - - 15,000 $5,933 $10.76 $4,944 $8.96 $3,958 $7.17 30,000 $7,547 $25.16 $6,289 $20.96 $5,031 $16.77 B Medical Office Tenant Improvement 300 $1,333 $116.66 $1,111 $97.22 $889 $77.77 - - 1,500 $2,733 $35.54 $2,278 $29.61 $1,822 $23.69 - 3,000 $3,266 $18.90 $2,722 $15.75 $2,177 $12.60 - - 6,000 $3,833 $29.64 $3,194 $24.70 $2,555 $19.76 - - 15,000 $6,500 $11.78 $5,417 $9.81 $4,334 $7.85 30,000 $8,267 $27.56 $6,889 $22.96 $5,511 $18.37 E AllETl 300 $1,159 $101.44 $966 $84.53 $773 $67.63 - 1,500 $2,377 $30.92 $1,980 $25.77 $1,584 $20.62 - 3,000 $2,840 $16.42 $2,367 $13.68 $1,894 $10.94 - - 6,000 $3,333 $25.77 $2,777 $21.47 $2,222 $17.18 - 15,000 $5,652 $10.25 $4,710 $8.54 $3,768 $6.83 30,000 $7,189 $23.96 $5,991 $19.97 $4,793 $15.98 1 I Occupancy Tl 300 $1,252 $109.55 $1,043 $91.29 $835 $73.03 - 1,500 $2,567 $33,40 $2,139 $27.83 $1,711 $22.26 - 3,000 $3,068 $17.72 $2,558 $14.77 $2,045 $11.82 - - 6,000 $3,599 $27.83 $2,999 $23.19 $2,400 $18.55 - 15,000 $6,104 $11.05 $5,087 $9.21 $4,069 $7.37 30,000 $7,762 $25.87 $6,468 $21.56 $5,174 $17.25 H Hazardous Occupancy TI 300 $1,565 $136.94 $1,304 $114.11 $1,043 $91.29 - 1,500 $3,208 $41.75 $2,674 $34.79 $2,139 $27.83 - 3,000 $3,834 $22.16 $3,195 $18.46 $2,556 $14.77 - 6,000 $4,499 $34.79 $3,749 $28.99 $2,999 $23.19 - 15,000 $7,630 $13.82 $6,358 $11.51 $5,087 $9.21 30,000 $9,702 $32.34 $8,085 $26.95 . $6,468 $21.56 MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 7 of 24 1/18/07 -1:19 PM 10-30 Appendix H City of Chula Vista Planning & Building Department-Building Division Consolidated Schedule of New Construction Fees - PLAN CHECK ONLY (All Construction Types) Construction Types: Construction Types: Construction "TYpes: IFR,IIFR lI,III,V.1 HR II,III,IV,V-N Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each UBe Project Size Threshold Additional1DO Threshold Additlonal1DO Threshold Additional 1 00 Class UBe Occupancy l'va. Threshold Size s.t. .. Size s.t. .. SIz. s.f.. M RetailTI 300 $1,333 $116.66 51,111 $97.22 $889 $nn - 1,500 $2,733 $35.54 $2.278 $29.61 $1,822 $23.69 - - 3,000 $3,266 $18.90 $2,722 $15.75 $2,1n $12.60 - - 6,000 $3,833 $29.64 $3,194 $24.70 $2.555 $19.76 15,000 $6,500 $11.78 $5,417 $9.81 $4,334 $7.85 30,000 $8,267 $27.56 $6,889 $22.96 $5,511 $18.37 - All Other TI (not listed above 300 51,333 $116.66 51,111 $97.22 $869 $77.77 - 1,500 $2,733 $35.54 $2,278 $29.61 $1,822 $23.69 3,000 $3.266 $18.90 $2,722 $15.75 $2,1n $12.60 - - 6,000 $3.833 $29.64 $3,194 $24.70 $2,555 $19.76 - - 15.000 $6,500 $11.78 $5.417 $9.81 $4,334 $7.85 30,000 $8,267 $27.56 $6,889 $22.96 $5,511 $18.37 SHELL BUILDINGS - All Shell BuHdin s 1,000 $1,797 $47.18 $1,497 $39.32 $1,198 $31.45 - - 5.000 $3,684 $14.37 $3,070 $11.98 $2,456 $9.58 . - 10,000 $4,403 $7.63 $3,869 $6.36 $2,935 $5.09 - 20,000 $5,166 $11.98 $4,305 $9.98 $3,444 $7.99 - . 50,000 $8,760 $4.77 $7,300 $3.98 $5,840 $3.18 100,000 $11,145 $11.15 $9,288 $9.29 $7,430 $7.43 Each additfona11 00 square feet, or portion thereof. up to the next highest project size threshold. MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 8 of 24 1/18/07.1:19 PM 10-31 Appendix H City of Chula Vista Planning & Building Department-Building Division Consolidated Schedule of New Construction Fees - INSP ONLY (All Construction Types) Construction Types: Construction Types: Construction Types: I FR,IIFR 1I,III,V.1 HR 11,11I, IV, V-N Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each UBC Project Size Threshold Addltlonal100 Threshold Additional 100 Threshold Additional 100 Class UBe Occupancy Type Threshold Size s.f. . Sl;r;e s.f. . Size s.f. . A-1 Theater 2,000 $3,933 $37.59 $3,278 $31.33 $2,622 $25.06 - 10,000 $6,941 $42.50 $5,784 $35.42 $4,627 $28.34 - - 20,000 $11.191 $13.19 $9.326 $10.99 $7,461 $8.79 - - 40,000 $13,829 $8.23 $11,524 $8.86 $9,219 $5.49 - - 100,000 $18,768 $5.14 $15,640 $4.28 $12.512 $3.42 200,000 $23,904 $11.95 $19920 $9.96 $15,936 $7.97 A-2 Church 2,000 $3,812 $36.44 $3,177 $30.37 $2,541 $24.29 - 10,000 $6,727 $41.18 $5,606 $34.32 $4,485 $27.46 - 20,000 $10,846 $12.78 $9,038 $10.65 $7,230 $8.52 - - 40,000 $13,402 $7.98 $11,168 $6.65 $8,934 $5.32 - - 100,000 $18,192 $4.97 $15,160 $4.14 $12,128 $3.31 200,000 $23,160 $11.58 $19,300 $9.65 $15,440 $7.n A-2.1 Auditorium 2,000 $3,812 $36.44 $3,177 $30.37 $2,541 $24.29 - 10,000 $6,727 $41.18 $5,606 $34.32 $4,485 $27.46 - 20,000 $10,846 $12.78 $9,038 $10.65 $7,230 $8.52 - - 40,000 $13,402 $7.98 $11,168 $6.65 $8,934 $5.32 - - 100,000 $18,192 $4.97 $15,160 $4.14 $12,128 $3.31 200,000 $23,160 $11.58 $19,300 $9.65 $15.440 $7.72 A-2.1 Restaurant 300 $1,882 $119.91 $1,568 $99.93 $1,255 $79.94 - - 1,500 $3,321 $135.53 $2,767 $112.94 $2,214 $90.35 - - 3,000 $5,354 $42.11 $4,461 $35.09 $3,569 $28.07 - - 6,000 $6,617 $26.23 $5,514 $21.86 $4,411 $17.49 - 15,000 $8,978 $16.41 $7,481 $13.68 $5,985 $10.94 30,000 $11,439 $38.13 $9,533 $31.78 $7,626 $25.42 A-3 Small Assembly BulldinQs 300 $1,832 $116.75 $1,527 $97.29 $1,221 $77.83 - - 1,500 $3,233 $131.94 $2,694 $109.95 $2,155 $87.96 - - 3,000 $5,212 $40.98 $4,343 $34.15 $3,475 $27.32 - - 6,000 $6,441 $25.56 $5,368 $21.30 $4.294 $17.04 - 15,000 $8,741 $15.95 $7,284 $13.29 $5,828 $10.63 30,000 $11,133 $37.11 $9,278 $30.93 $7,422 $24.74 B Banks 500 $2,032 $77.67 $1,693 $64.73 $1,354 $51.78 - 2,500 $3,585 $87.81 $2,988 $73.18 $2,390 $58.54 - - 5,000 $5,780 $27.26 $4,817 $22.71 $3,854 $18.17 - - 10,000 $7,143 $17.01 $5,953 . $14.17 $4,762 $11.34 - - 25,000 $9,694 $10.61 $8,078 $8.84 $6,463 $7.07 50,000 $12,345 $24.69 $10,288 $20.58 $8,230 $16.46 B Laundromat 200 $1,527 $146.00 $1,273 $121.66 $1,018 $97.33 - - 1,000 $2,695 $165.02 $2,246 $137.51 $1,797 $110.01 - - 2,000 $4,346 $51.26 $3,621 $42.71 $2,897 $34.17 4,000 $5,371 $31.94 $4,476 $26.62 $3,580 $21.29 - 10,000 $7,287 $19.98 $6,073 $16.65 $4,858 $13.32 20,000 $9,285 $46.43 $7,738 $38.69 $6,190 $30.95 B Medical Office 2,000 $3,816 $36.48 $3,180 $30.40 $2,544 $24.32 - 10,000 $6,734 $41.23 $5,612 $34.36 $4,490 $27.49 - 20,000 $10,858 $12.79 $9,048 $10.66 $7,238 $8.53 - 40,000 $13,416 $7.98 $11,180 $6.65 $8,944 $5.32 - 100,000 $18,204 $4.98 $15,170 $4.15 $12,136 $3.32 200,000 $23,184 $11.59 $19,320 $9.66 $15,456 $7.73 MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 9 of 24 1/18/07 -1:19 PM 10-32 Appendix H City of Chula Vista Planning & Bui/ding Department-Building Division Consolidated Schedule of New Construction Fees -INSP ONLY (All Construction Types) Construction Types: Construction Types: Construction Types: I FR,IIFR 1I,III,V-1 HR 1I,III,IV,V.N Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost@ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each UBe Project Size Threshold Additional 100 Threshold Additional 100 Threshold Additlonal1QO Class UBe Occupancy Type Threshold Size 5.1. .. Siz. s.f. .. Size s.f. " 8 Offices 2,000 $3,476 $33.23 $2.897 $27.69 $2,318 $22.15 . . 10,000 $6.134 $37.56 $5,112 $31.30 $4,090 . $25.04 . . 20,000 S9,890 $11.68 $8,242 $9.73 $6,594 $7.78 . 40,000 $12,226 $7.28 $10,198 $6.05 $8,150 $4.84 . . 100,000 $16,584 $4.54 $13.820 $3.78 $11,056 $3.02 200,000 $21,120 $10.56 $17,600 $8.80 $14,080 $7.04 B HJah Rise Office Buildina 15,000 $7,069 $9.01 $5,891 $7.51 $4,712 $6.01 . 75,000 $12,474 $10.18 $10,395 $8.48 $8,316 $8.78 . . 150,000 $20,106 $3.16 $16,755 $2.63 $13,404 $2.10 . . 300,000 $24,840 $1.98 $20,700 $1.65 $16,560 $1.32 . . 750,000 $33,750 $1.24 $28,125 $1.03 $22,500 $0.82 1,500,000 $43,020 $2.87 $35,850 $2.39 $28,680 $1.91 8 Hich Rise condo BuildlnQ 15,000 $7,666 $9.77 $6,389 $8.14 $5,111 $6.51 . . 75,000 $13,527 $11.05 $11,273 $9.21 $9,018 $7.37 . 150,000 $21,616 $3.43 $18,180 $2.88 $14,544 $2.29 - . 300,000 $26,964 $2.13 $22,470 $1.77 $17,976 $1.42 . 750,000 $36,540 $1.34 $30,450 $1.12 $24,360 $0.90 1,500,000 $46 620 $3.11 $38 850 $2.59 $31,080 $2.07 E.1 Preschool/School 300 $1,882 $119.91 $1,568 $99.93 $1,255 $79.94 . . 1,500 $3.321 $135.53 $2,767 $112.94 $2,214 $90.35 . . 3,000 $5,354 $42.11 $4,461 $35.09 $3,569 $28.07 . . 6,000 $6.617 $26.23 $5,514 $21.86 $4,411 $17.49 . . 15,000 $8,978 $16.41 $7,481 $13.68 $5,985 $10.94 30,000 $11,439 $38.13 $9,533 $31.78 $7,626 $25.42 E.2 Preschool/Schaal 300 $1,882 $119.91 $1,568 $99.93 $1,255 $79.94 . . 1,500 $3,321 $135.53 $2,767 $112.94 $2,214 $90.35 . . 3,000 $5,354 $42.11 $4,481 $35.09 $3,569 $28.07 . 6,000 $6,617 $26.23 $5,514 $21.86 $4,411 $17.49 . . 15,000 $8,978 $16.41 $7,481 $13.68 $5,985 $10.94 30,000 $11,439 $38,13 $9,533 $31.78 $7,626 $25.42 E-3 Daycare 300 ., ,882 $119.91 $1,568 $99.93 $1.255 $79.94 . 1,500 $3,321 $135.53 $2.767 $112.94 $2,214 $90.35 . . 3,000 $5,354 $42.11 $4,461 $35.09 $3,569 $28.07 . . 6,000 $6,617 $26.23 $5,514 $21.86 $4,411 $17.49 . . 15,000 $8,978 $16.41 $7,481 $13.68 $5,985 $10.94 30,000 $11439 $38.13 $9,533 $31.78 $7 626 $25.42 F.1 Industnal/Manufacturina 1,000 $2.256 $43.14 $1,880 $35.95 $1,504 $28.76 . . 5,000 $3,982 $48.74 $3.318 $40.62 $2,654 $32.50 . . 10,000 $6,419 $15.16 $5,349 $12.63 $4,279 $10.10 20,000 $7,934 $9.43 $6,612 $7.66 $5.290 $6.29 . 50,000 $10,764 $5.90 $8,970 $4.92 $7,176 $3.94 100,000 $13,716 $13.72 $11,430 $11.43 $9,144 $9.14 F.2 Heavv Industrial 2,000 $3,756 $35.91 $3,130 $29.93 $2,504 $23.94 . . 10,000 $6,629 $40.58 $5,524 $33.82 $4,419 $27.06 . . 20,000 $10.687 $12.61 $8,906 $10.51 $7,125 $8.41 . 40,000 $13,210 $7.84 $11,008 $6.54 $8,806 $5.23 . 100,000 $17,916 $4.91 $14,930 $4.09 $11,944 $3.27 200,000 $22,824 $11.41 $19,020 $9.51 $15.216 $7.61 MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 10 of 24 1/18/07.1:19 PM 10-33 Appendix H City at Chula Vista Planning & Building Department-Building Division Consolidated Schedule of New Construction Fees -INSP ONLY (All Construction Types) Construction Types: Construction Types: Construction Types: IFR,IIFR 11,III,V.1 HR II. IU, IV, V-N Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost@ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each use Project Size Threshold Additional 100 Threshold Additions/lOa Threshold Additional 100 Class use Occupancy Type Threshold Size s.t. .. Size s.t. .. Size 5.1." H-1 High Explosion Hazard 500 $2,364 $90.39 $1,970 $75.33 $1,576 $60.26 - 2,500 $4,172 $102.17 $3,477 $85.14 $2,781 $68.11 - 5,000 $6,726 $31.73 $5,605 $26.44 $4,484 $21.15 - 10,000 $8,312 $19.78 $6,927 $16.49 $5,542 $13.19 - 25,000 $11,280 $12.36 $9,400 $10.30 $7,520 $8.24 50,000 $14,370 $28.74 $11.975 $23.95 $9,580 $19.16 H-2 Moderate Explosion Hazard 1,000 $2,376 $45.42 $1,980 $37.85 $1,584 $30.28 - - 5,000 $4,193 $51.34 $3,494 $42.78 $2,795 $34.22 - - 10,000 $6,760 $15.95 $5,633 $13.29 $4,506 $10.63 - - 20,000 $8,354 $9.93 $6,962 $6.28 $5,570 $6.62 50,000 $11,334 $6.23 $9,445 $5.19 $7,558 $4.15 100,000 $14,448 $14.45 $12,040 $12.04 $9,632 $9.63 H-3 High Fire Hazard 1,000 $2,416 $46.19 $2,013 $38.50 $1,611 $30.80 - - 5,000 $4,264 $52,20 $3,553 $43.50 $2,842 $34.80 - - 10,000 $6,874 $18,22 $5,728 $13.52 $4,582 $10.82 - 20,000 $8,496 $10.10 $7,080 $8.42 $5,664 $6.73 50,000 $11,526 $6.32 $9,605 $5.27 $7,684 $4.22 100,000 $14,688 $14.69 $12,240 $12.24 $9,792 $9.79 H-4 Repair Garage 300 $1,705 $108.66 $1,421 $90.55 $1,137 $72.44 - - 1,500 $3,009 $122.80 $2,508 $102.33 $2,006 $81.86 - 3,000 $4,851 $38,15 $4,043 $31.79 $3,234 $25,43 6,000 $5,995 $23.78 $4,996 $19,82 $3,997 $15.86 - 15,000 $8,136 $14.86 $6,780 $12.38 $5,424 $9.90 30,000 $10,364 $34.55 $8,637 $28.79 $6,910 $23.03 H-5 Aircraft HanoerlRepairs 1,000 $2,820 $53,92 $2,350 $44.93 $1,880 $35,95 - 5,000 $4,9n $60.93 $4,148 $50.78 $3,318 $40.62 - 10,000 $8,024 $18.95 $6,686 $15.79 $5,349 $12.63 - 20,000 $9,918 $11.79 $8,265 $9.83 $6,612 $7.86 - - 50,000 $13,455 $7,38 $11,213 $6.15 $8,970 $4.92 100,000 $17,145 $17.15 $14,288 $14.29 $11,430 $11.43 H-S' Semiconductor Fabrication 1,000 $2,296 $43.89 $1,913 $36.58 $1,531 $29.26 - - 5,000 $4,052 $49.62 $3,377 $41.35 $2,701 $33.08 - - 10,000 $6,533 $15.41 $5,444 $12.84 $4,355 $10.27 - 20,000 $8,074 $9.61 $6,728 $8.01 $5,382 $6,41 - 50.000 $10,956 $6.00 $9,130 $5.00 $7,304 $4.00 100,000 $13956 $13.96 $11,630 $11.63 $9,304 $9.30 H-7 Health Hazard Materials 500 $2,045 $78.18 $1,704 $65.15 $1,363 $52.12 - 2,500 $3,608 $88.36 $3,007 $73.63 $2,405 $58.90 - 5,000 $5,817 $27,<< $4,848 $22.87 $3,878 $18.30 - 10,000 $7,189 $17.11 $5,991 $14.26 $4,793 $11.41 - 25,000 $9,756 $10.68 $8,130 $8.90 $6,504 $7.12 50,000 $12.426 $24.85 $10,355 $20.71 $8,284 $16.57 1-1.1 Nursery - Full-Time (5+) 200 $1,382 $132.07 $1,151 $110.06 $921 $88.04 - 1,000 $2,438 $149.28 $2,032 $124.40 $1,625 $99.52 - - 2,000 $3,931 $46.38 $3,276 $38.65 $2,621 $30.92 - - 4,000 $4,859 $28.88 $4,049 $24.07 $3,239 $19.26 - 10,000 $6,592 $18.06 $5,493 $15.05 $4,394 $12.04 20,000 $8,398 $41.99 $6,998 $34.99 $5,598 $27.99 MAXIMUS, Inc, Page 11 at 24 1/18/07 -1:19 PM 10-34 Appendix H City of Chula Vista Planning & Bui/ding Department-Bui/ding Division Consolidated Schedule of New Construction Fees .INSP ONLY (All Construction Types) Construction Types: Construction Types: Construction Types: IFR,IIFR 11,111, V~1 HR 11,111, IV, V-N Base Cost @ Cost for Each Bas8 Cost @ Cost for Each Sase Cost @ Cost for Each use use OccuDancv TYoe Project Size Threshold Additional 100 Threshold Additional 100 Threshold Additional 1 00 Class Threshold Size s.f. ... Size s.f. ... Size s.f. ... 1-1.2 Health Care Centers 500 $2,037 $77.87 $1,697 $64.90 $1,358 $61,92 - 2,500 $3,694 $BB,01 $2.995 $73,34 $2,396 $6B,67 - - 5,000 $5,794 $27.35 $4,829 $22.79 $3,863 $18.23 - - 10,000 $7,162 $17,04 $5,96B $14.20 $4,774 $1'1,36 - - 25,000 $9,717 $10.64 $B,098 $8.87 $6,478 $7,10 50,000 $12,378 $24.76 $10,315 $20.63 $8,252 $16,50 1-2 NursinCl Home/Assisted Uvinn 250 $2,064 $157.87 $1,720 $131.56 $1,376 $105.25 - - 1,250 $3,643 $178.44 $3,036 $148.70 $2.429 $118.96 - - 2,500 $5,874 $55,43 $4,895 $46.19 $3,916 $36.95 - - 5,000 $7,259 $34,55 $6,050 $28.79 $4,840 $23.03 - - 12,500 $9,851 $21.59 $8,209 $17.99 $6,567 $14,39 25,000 $12,549 $50.20 $10,458 $41,83 $8,366 $33,48 ]-3 Mental Hosoital/Jail 2,500 $4,277 $32,70 $3,564 $27.25 $2,851 $21.80 - - 12,500 $7,547 $36.97 $6,289 $30.81 $5,031 $24,85 - - 25,000 $12,168 $11.47 $10,140 $9,58 $8,112 $7,85 - - 50,000 $15,036 $7,15 $12,530 $5.96 $10,024 $4.77 - - 125,000 $20,400 $4,49 $17,000 $3.74 $13,600 $2,99 250,000 $26,010 $10.40 $21,675 $8.67 $17 340 $6,94 M Stores {Reta"' 2,500 $4,815 $36.83 $4,012 $30.69 $3,210 $24.55 - - 12,500 $8,498 $41.61 $7,081 $34.68 $5,685 $27.74 - - 25,000 $13,699 $12.92 $11,416 $10.76 $9,133 $8.81 - 50,000 $16,928 $B.06 $14,106 $8,71 $11,285 $6,37 - - 125,000 $22,969 $5,03 $19,141 $4,19 $15,313 $3,35 250,000 $29,250 $11.70 $24,375 $9.75 $19,500 $7,BO M Market 2,500 $4,B15 $36.83 $4,012 $30.69 $3,210 $24,55 - 12,500 $8,496 $41.61 $7,081 $34.68 $5,665 $27,74 - - 25,000 $13,699 $12.92 $11,416 $10.76 $9,133 $8.61 - - 50,000 $16,928 $8.06 $14,106 $8,71 $11,285 $6,37 - - 125,000 $22,969 $5.03 $19,141 $4.19 $15,313 $3,35 250,000 $29,250 $11.70 $24,375 $9.75 $19,500 $7.80 R-1 Apartment Bldg 800 $3,269 $78.13 $2,725 $65.11 $2,1BO $52.09 - - 4,000 $5,nO $88.32 $4,808 $73.60 $3,846 $58.88 - - 8,000 $9,302 $27.42 $7,752 $22,85 $8,202 $18,2B - - 16,000 $11,496 $17.10 $9,580 $14.25 $7,664 $11.40 - 40,000 $15,600 $10.68 $13,000 $8.90 $10,400 $7.12 80,000 $19,872 $24.84 $16,560 $20.70 $13,248 $16.56 R-1 Ar'lartment Bldn . Repeat Unit 800 $2,225 $53.17 $1,854 $44.31 $1,483 $35.45 - - 4,000 $3,926 $60.10 $3,272 $50.08 $2,618 $40.06 - - 8,000 $6,330 $18,67 $5,275 $15.56 $4,220 $12,45 - - 16,000 $7,B24 $11.64 $6,520 $9.70 $6,216 $7,76 - 40,000 $10,818 $7,27 $8,848 $6.06 $7,078 $4,85 80,000 $13,526 $16,91 $11,272 $14,09 $9,01B $11.27 R-l Hotels & Motels 5,000 $4,952 $18,94 $4,127 $15.78 $3,301 $12.62 - - 25,000 $B,739 $21.40 $7,283 $17.83 $5,B28 $14.26 - 50,000 $14,088 $6.65 $11,740 $5,54 $9,392 $4.43 - - 100,000 $17,412 $4.15 $14,510 $3.46 $11,608 $2.77 - - 250,000 $23,640 $2.59 $19,700 $2.16 $15,760 $1.73 500,000 $30,120 $6.02 $25,100 $5.02 $20,080 $4.02 MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 12 of 24 1/18/07 -1:19 PM 10-35 Appendix H City of Chula Vista Planning & Building Department-Building Division Consolidated Schedule of New Construction Fees -INSP ONLY (All Construction Types) Construction Types: Construction Types: Construction Types: I FR, II FR II, III, v~ 1 HR lI,m, IV, V.N Base Cost @ Cost for Each Bas8 Cost@ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each use use Occucancv TYoe Project Size Threshold Additional 100 Threshold Additional 100 Threshold AddItional 100 Class Threshold Size 5.1. " Size 5.1." Size 5.1." R-1 Hotels & Motels. Phased Permits 5,000 $4,952 $18.94 $4,127 $15.78 $3,301 $12.62 - - 25,000 $8,739 $21.40 $7,283 $17.83 $5,826 $14.26 - 50,000 $14,088 $6.65 $11.740 $5.54 $9,392 $4.43 - 100,000 $17,412 $4.15 $14,510 $3.46 $11,608 $2.77 - 250,000 $23,640 $2.59 $19,700 $2.16 $15,760 $1.73 500,000 $30,120 $6.02 $25,100 $5.02 $20,080 $4.02 R-3 Dwellings. Custom 1,500 $2,982 $14.18 $2,485 $11.81 $1,988 $9.45 - 2,500 $3,124 $99.45 $2,603 $82.88 $2,083 $66.30 - 3,500 $4,119 $61.53 $3,432 $51.27 $2,746 $41.02 - 5,000 $5,042 $49.71 $4,201 $41.43 $3,361 $33.14 - - 8,000 $6,533 $32.45 $5,444 $27.04 $4,355 $21.63 15,000 $8,804 $58.70 $7,337 $46.91 $5,870 $39.13 R-3 Dwellings. Model 1,500 $3,266 $42.59 $2,722 $35.49 $2,178 $28.40 - 2,500 $3,692 $56.81 $3,on $47.34 $2,462 $37.88 - 3,500 $4,260 $61.53 $3,550 $51.27 $2,840 $41.02 - 5,000 $5,183 $40.23 $4,319 $33.52 $3.456 $26.82 - - 8,000 $6,390 $28.41 $5,325 $23.68 $4,260 $18.94 15,000 $8,379 $55.88 $6,983 $46.55 $5,585 $37.24 R-3 Dwellings. Production Phase 1,500 $2,776 $36.21 $2,314 $30.18 $1,851 $24.14 of Master Plan 2.500 $3,138 $48.31 $2,615 $40.26 $2,092 $32.21 I (repeats) 3,500 $3,621 $52.32 $3,018 $43.60 $2,414 $34.88 - - 5,000 $4,406 $34.21 $3,672 $28.50 $2,938 $22.80 - 8,000 $5,432 $24.13 $4,527 $20.11 $3,622 $16.08 15,000 $7,121 $47.48 $5,934 $39.56 $4.748 $31.65 R-3 Owellinas . Alternate Materials 1,500 $3,593 $46.86 $2,994 $39.05 $2,395 $31.24 - - 2,500 $4,062 . $62.51 $3,365 $52.09 $2,708 $41.67 - - 3,500 $4,687 $67.65 $3,906 $56.36 $3,124 $45.10 - 5,000 $5,702 $44.27 $4,751 $36.89 $3,801 $29.51 - 8,000 $7,030 $31.23 $5,858 $26.03 $4,686 $20.82 15,000 $9,216 $61.44 $7,680 $51.20 $6,144 $40.96 R-2.1, Graup Care, Non.Amb. (6+) 2,000 $3,674 $35.12 $3,061 $29.27 $2,449 $23.42 2.3 & 6.1 - 10,000 $6,484 $39.68 $5,403 $33.07 $4,322 $26.46 - - 20,000 $10,452 $12.32 $8,710 $10.27 $6.968 $8.22 - - 40,000 $12,917 $7.69 $10.764 $6.41 $8,611 $5.13 - - 100.000 $17,532 $4.79 $14.610 $3.99 $11.688 $3.19 200,000 $22,320 $11.16 $18.600 $9.30 $14,880 $7.44 R-2.2& Graup Care, Ambulatary (6+) 2,000 $3,674 $35.12 $3,061 $29.27 $2,449 $23.42 6.20 10,000 $6,464 $39.68 $5,403 $33.07 $4,322 $26.46 - 20,000 $10,452 $12.32 $8,710 $10.27 $6,968 $8.22 - 40,000 $12,917 $7.69 $10,764 $6.41 $8,611 $5.13 - 100,000 $17,532 $4.79 $14,610 $3.99 $11,688 $3.19 200,000 $22.320 $11.16 $18,600 $9.30 $14,a80 $7.44 R.2.1.1, Group Care, Non~Amb. (1-5) 200 $1,797 $171.76 $1,497 $143.13 $1,198 $114.51 2.3.1 & - 1,000 $3,171 $194.16 $2,643 $161.80 $2.114 $129.44 6.1.1 - 2,000 $5,113 $60.30 $4,261 $50.25 $3,408 $40.20 - - 4,000 $6.319 $37.59 $5,266 $31.33 $4,212 $25.06 - 10,000 $8,574 $23.49 $7,145 $19.58 $5,716 $15.66 20,000 $10,923 $54.62 $9,103 $45.51 $7,282 $36.41 MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 13 of 24 1/18/07 -1:19 PM 10-36 Appendix H City of Chula Vista Planning & BUilding Department-Building Division Consolidated Schedule of New Construction Fees -INSP ONLY (All Construction Types) Construction Types: Construction Types: Construction Types: I FR,IIFR 1I,III,V-1 HR II,III,IV,V-N Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each UBe UBe OccuDancv TYoe Project SIze Threshold Addftlonal1DO Threshold Additional 100 Threshold Additional 1 00 Class Threshold Size s.f. . SiZe s.f. . SIz. s.f. . R-2.2.1 & Group Care, Amb. (1-5) 200 $1,797 $171.76 $1,497 $143.13 $1,198 $114,51 6.2.1 1,000 $3,171 $194.18 $2,643 $161.80 $2,114 $129.44 - 2.000 $5,113 $50.30 $4,261 $50.2S $3,408 $40.20 - 4,000 $6,319 $37.59 $5,266 $31.33 $4,212 $25.06 - - 10,000 $8,574 $23.49 $7,145 $19.58 $5,716 $15.66 20,000 $10,923 $54.62 $9,103 $45.51 $7,282 $36.41 5-1 Moderate Hazard StoraCle 1,000 $2,420 $46.26 $2,017 $38.55 $1,613 $30.84 . - 5.000 $4,270 $52.28 $3,559 $43.57 $2,847 $34.86 . - 10,000 $6,884 $16.24 $5,737 $13.53 $4,590 $10.82 - 20,000 S8.508 $10.12 $7,090 $8.43 $5,672 $6.75 - - SO,OOO $11,544 $6.34 $9,620 $5.28 $7.696 $4.22 100,000 $14,712 $14.71 $12.260 $12.26 $9.808 $9.81 5-1 Self Storage 2.000 $3,115 $29.77 $2,596 $24.81 $2,076 $19.84 - - 10,000 $5,496 533.65 $4,580 $28.04 $3,664 $22.43 - 20,000 $8,861 $10.46 $7,384 $8.72 $5,907 $6.98 - - 40,000 $10.954 $6.50 $9,128 $5.42 $7,302 $4.34 . - 100,000 $14,856 $4.08 $12.380 $3.40 $9,904 $2.72 200,000 $18936 $9.47 $15,780 $7.B9 $12,624 $6.31 5-2 Low Hazard Storage 1,000 $2,532 $48.40 $2.110 $40.33 $1.888 $32.27 - - 5,000 $4,468 $54.70 $3,723 $45.58 $2,978 $36.46 - 10,000 $7,202 $16.99 $6,002 $14.16 $4,802 $11.33 - 20,000 S8,902 $10.59 $7,418 $8.82 $5,934 $7.06 - 50,000 $12,078 $6.61 $10,065 $5.51 $8,052 $4.41 100,000 $15,384 $15.38 $12,820 $12.82 $10,256 $10.26 5-3 Repair Garane 1,000 $2,532 $48.40 $2.110 $40.33 $1,688 $32.27 . IlnotH4) 5,000 $4,468 $54.70 $3,723 $45.58 $2,978 $36.46 - 10,000 $7,202 $16.99 $6,002 $14.16 $4,802 $11.33 - - 20,000 $8,902 $10.59 $7,418 $8.82 $5,934 $7.06 - - 50,000 $12,078 $6.61 $10,065 $5.51 $8,052 $4.41 100,000 $15,384 $15.38 $12,820 $12.82 $10,256 $10.26 5-3 Fuel Dispensing CanoDY 100 $499 $95.43 $416 $79.53 $333 $63.62 - - 500 $881 $107.87 $734 $89.89 $587 $71.91 - 1,000 $1,420 $33.51 $1,184 $27.93 $947 $22.34 . - 2,000 $1,755 $20.87 $1,463 $17.39 $1,170 $13.91 - - 5,000 $2,381 $13.07 $1,984 $10.89 $1,588 $8.71 10,000 $3,035 $30.35 $2.529 $25.29 $2,023 $20.23 5-3 Parking Garage 1,000 $3,806 $68.93 $3,005 $57.44 $2,404 $45.95 - 5,000 $6,363 $77.92 $5,303 $64.93 $4,242 $51.94 . - 10,000 $10,259 $24.20 $8,549 $20.17 $6.839 $16.14 - . 20,000 $12,679 $15.08 $10,566 $12.56 $8,453 $10.05 - SO,OOO $17,202 $9.42 $14,335 $7.85 $11,468 $8.28 100,000 $21,912 $21.91 $18,260 $18.26 $14,608 $14.61 5-4 Open Parkina GaraQe 1,000 $3,462 $66.19 $2,885 $55.16 $2,308 544.13 - 5,000 $6,110 $74.80 $5,092 $62.33 $4.073 $49.86 - 10,000 $9,850 $23.23 $8,208 $19.36 $6,568 $15.49 - . 20,000 $12,173 $14.48 $10,144 $12.07 $8,115 $9.66 - - 50,000 $18,518 $9.06 $13,785 $7.55 $11,012 $6.04 100,000 $21,048 $21.05 $17,540 $17.54 $14,032 $14.03 MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 14 of 24 1/18/07 -1:19 PM 10-37 Appendix H City 01 C hula Vista Planning & Building Department-Building Division Consolidated Schedule of New Construction Fees. INSP ONLY (All Construction Types) Constl1Jction Types: Construction Types: Construction Types: IFR,IIFR 1I.11I.V-tHR II,III,IV,V.N Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each UBe UBe OccuDancv TYpe ProjectSiza Threshold Additional 100 Threshold AddltJonal100 Threshold Additional 100 Class Threshold Size s.t. . Size s.f. . Size s.l.* 5-5 Aircraft Hanoer & Helistops 500 $2,680 $102.49 $2,234 $85.41 $1,787 . $68.33 - - 2,500 $4,730 $115.83 $3,942 $96.52 $3,154 sn.22 - - 5,000 $7,626 $36.00 $6,355 $30.00 $5,084 $24.00 - 10,000 $9,426 $22.41 $7,855 $18.68 $6,284 $14.94 - - 25,000 $12.788 $14.01 $10,656 $11.88 $8,525 $9.34 50,000 $16,290 $32.58 $13,575 $27.15 $10,860 $21.72 U-1 Private GarageslAccessorv Buildinas 100 $599 $114.52 $499 $95.43 $399 $76.35 - (also need to add a repeat category) 500 $1,057 $129.42 $881 $107.85 $705 $8628 - - 1,000 $1,704 $40.22 $1,420 $33.51 $1,136 $26.81 - - 2,000 $2,106 $25,04 $1,755 $20.87 $1,404 $16.69 - 5,000 $2,858 $15.66 $2,381 $13.05 $1,905 $10.44 10,000 $3,641 $36.41 $3,034 $30.34 $2,427 $24.27 '-2 Convalescent Hospital 200 $1,682 $160.80 $1,402 $134.00 $1,121 $107.20 - - 1,000 $2,969 $181.74 $2,474 $151.45 $1,979 $121.16 2,000 $4,786 $56.45 $3,988 $47.04 $3,191 $37.63 - 4,000 $5,915 $35.20 $4,929 $29.33 $3 ,943 $23.46 - - 10,000 $8,027 $21.98 $6,689 $18.31 $5,351 $14.65 20,000 $10,224 $51.12 $8,520 $42.60 $6,816 $34.08 A Restaurant T1 300 $1,223 $77.92 $1,019 $64.93 $815 $51.95 - 1,500 $2,158 $88.10 $1,798 $73.41 $1,439 $58.73 - 3,000 $3,479 $27.36 $2,900 $22.80 $2,320 $18.24 - 6,000 $4,300 $17.05 $3,584 $14.20 $2,867 $11.36 - 15,000 $5,834 $10.67 $4,862 $8.89 $3,890 $7.11 30,000 $7,434 $24.78 $6,195 $20.65 $4,956 $16.52 B Office Tenant Improvement 300 $1,098 $69.98 $915 $58.32 $732 $46.66 - - 1,500 $1,938 $79.10 $1,615 $65.91 $1,292 $52.73 - - 3,000 $3,124 $24.56 $2,604 $20.46 $2,083 $16.37 - - 6,000 $3,861 $15.33 $3,218 $12.77 $2,574 $10.22 - 15,000 $5,240 $9.55 $4,367 $7.96 $3.494 $6.37 30,000 $6,674 $22.25 $5,561 $18.54 $4,449 $14.83 B Medical Office Tenant Improvement 300 $1,123 $71.56 $936 $59.63 $749 $47.71 - - 1,500 $1,982 $80.91 $1,652 $67.43 $1,321 $53.94 - 3,000 $3,195 $25.13 $2,663 $20.94 $2,130 $16.75 - - 6,000 $3,949 $15.67 $3,291 $13.06 $2,633 $10.45 - - 15,000 $5,360 $9.78 $4,466 $8,15 $3,573 $6.52 30,000 $6,827 $22.76 $5,689 $18.96 $4,551 $15.17 E MET1 300 $839 $53.43 $699 $44.53 $559 $35.62 - 1,500 $1,480 $60.40 $1,233 $50.33 $987 $40.26 - - 3,000 $2,386 $18.76 $1,988 $15.63 $1,590 $12.50 - - 6,000 $2,948 $11.70 $2,457 $9.75 $1,966 $7.80 - - 15,000 $4,001 $7.31 $3,335 $6.09 $2,668 $4.87 30,000 $5,098 $16.99 $4.248 $14.16 $3,398 $11.33 , I Occupancy TI 300 $839 $53.43 $699 $44.53 $559 $35.62 - - 1,500 $1,480 $60.40 $1,233 $50.33 $987 $40,26 - 3,000 $2,386 $18.76 $1,988 $15.63 $1,590 $12.50 - 6,000 $2,948 $11.70 $2,457 $9.75 $1,966 $7.80 - 15,000 $4,001 $7.31 $3,335 $6.09 $2,668 $4.87 30,000 $5,098 $16.99 $4,248 $14.16 $3,398 $11.33 H Hazardous Occupancy Tl 300 $1,123 $71.56 $936 $59.63 $749 $47.71 - - 1,500 $1,982 $80.91 $1,652 $67.43 $1,321 $53.94 - 3,000 $3,195 $25.13 $2,663 $20.94 $2,130 $16.75 - 6,000 $3,949 $15.67 $3,291 $13.06 $2,633 $10.45 - - 15,000 $5,360 $9.78 $4,466 $8.15 $3,573 $8.52 30,000 $6,827 $22.76 $5,689 $18.96 $4,551 $15.17 MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 150124 1/18107 -1:19 PM 10-38 Appendix H City of Chula Vista Planning & Building Department-Building Division Consolidated Schedule of New Construction Fees - INSP ONLY (All Construction Types) Construction Types: Construction Types: Construction "TYpes: I FR,IIFR II, III, v~ 1 HR II, III, IV, V.N Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each UBe Project Size Threshold Additional 100 Threshold Additional 100 Threshold Additional 100 Class uae Occupancy Type Threshold Size s.f. .. Size s.f.. SIze s.f. .. M RetaUTI 300 $1,073 $68.39 $894 $58.99 $715 $45.59 - - 1,500 $1,894 $77.30 $1.578 $64.41 $1,263 $51.53 - 3.000 $3,053 $24.02 $2,544 $20.01 $2,038 $16.01 - - 6,000 $3,774 $14.97 $3,145 $12.48 $2,518 $9.98 - - 15,000 $5,121 $9.36 $4,268 $7.80 $3,414 $6.24 30,QOO $8,525 $21.75 $5,438 $18.13 $4,350 $14.50 All OtherTf (not listed above) 300 $1,323 $84.29 $1,102 $70.24 $882 $58.19 - - 1,500 $2.334 $95.28 $1,945 $79,40 $1,556 $83.52 - - 3,000 $3,763 $29.60 $3,136 $24.66 $2.509 $19.73 - 6,000 $4,651 $18.45 $3,876 $15.37 $3,101 $12.30 - . 15,000 $6,311 $11.54 $5,259 $9.61 $4,208 $7.69 30 000 $8 042 $26.81 $6701 $22.34 $5361 $17.87 SHELL BUILDINGS - All Shell Buildin 1,000 $2,670 $51.05 $2,225 $42.54 $1,780 $34.03 - 5,000 $4,712 $57.71 $3,927 $48.09 $3,142 $38.47 - - 10,000 $7,598 $17.93 $6,331 $14.94 $5,065 $11.95 - 20,000 $9,390 $11.18 $7,825 $9.31 $6,260 $7.45 - - 50,000 $12,743 $6.98 $10,619 $5.81 $8,495 $4.65 100,000 $16,230 $16.23 $13,525 $13.53 $10,820 $10.82 Each additional 1 00 square feet, or portion thereof, up to the next highest project size threshold. MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 16 of 24 1/18/07 -1:19 PM 10-39 ~ o I ~ o City of Chula Vistil MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES Planning & Building Department-Building Division Estimated Actual Unit CDst - TIme based on a per- Fee Types (in minutes) minute rate of $ 2.28 ADMINISTRATIVE AND MISC. FEES I PermIt Issuance includes travel documentation) 65.00 $ 193.64 I MECHANICAL PERMIT FEES Stand Alone Mechanical Plan Check lhourlv rate' 60.00 $ 136.83 UNIT FEES: Ale (Residential) - each 45 $ 102.62 Furnaces F.A.U. Floor 45 $ 102.62 Heater (WaUl 45 102.62 ~nnllance VenUChlmnev {Onlv\ 45 $ 102.62 Refriaeratlon COffioressor 45 . 102.62 Boiler 45 $ 102.62 Chiller 105 . 239.45 Heat Pumn tPackana VniO 45 . 102.62 Heater tUnit Radiant etc. \ 45 $ 102.62 Air Handler 45 $ 102.62 Duct Work onlv 45 $ 102;62 Evanorative Cooler 45 $ 102.62 Make-UD Air System 45 $ 102.62 Moisture Exhaust Duct {Clothes DlVer\ 45 . 102.62 Vent Fan {Sinnle Duct' - each 45 $ 102.62 Vent Svstem 45 $ 102.62 Exhaust Hood and Duct (Residential) 45 $ 102.62 Exhaust Hood - Tvne I {Commercial Grease Hood' 105 $ 239.45 Exhaust Hood - Tvne II (Commercial Steam Hood) 105 $ 239.45 Non~Resldentiallnc;nerator 165 $ 376.28 Refriaerator Condenser Remote 45 $ 102.62 Walk-in BoxlRefrinerator Coil 75 $ 171.04 $ - Other Mechanlcallnsoections (oer hour) 60.00 $ 136.83 )> "0 "0 CD ::J C. x' I MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 1 of3 City of Chula Vista MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES Planning & Building Department-Building Division ..... Cl I .j:o ..... Estimated Actual Unit Cost Time based on B per- Fee Types (In minutes) minute rate of $ 2.28 PLUMBING/GAS PERMIT FEES Stand Alone Plumbinu Plan Check (hourlv ratel 60.00 I 136.83 I UNIT FEES: I !I - Fixtures (first 5 fixtures) 45 $ 102.62 Fixtures leach add'l fixture) 10 Gas Svstem - New/ReoairfReolace lincl 5ouUets) 45 I 102.82 Gas Outlets Each Additionan 10 I. 22.81 Buildln!:! Sewer 45 $ 102.62 Grease TraDllnterceotor 45 I 102.62 Backflow Preventer First 5) 105 I 239.45 Backflow Preventer (More than 5) . each 15 $ 34.21 Roof Drain - Rainwater System 45 I 102.62 Water Heater IFirst Heater) 45 I 102.62 Water Heater tEach Additional Heater) 15 I 34.21 Water Pipe Repair/Replacement 45 I 102.62 Drain-Vent Repair/Alterations 45 S 102.62 Drinklnn Fountain 45 $ 102.62 Solar Water System Fixtures lsolar panels tanks water treatment enuinmentl 45 S 102.62 Gravwater Svstems IDer hour) 50 S 136.83 Medical Gas SYstem - New 180 S 410.49 Medical Gas SYstem new outlet repair or replace s stem\ 45 S 102.62 New Gas Meter 45 S 102.62 Reset Gas Meter 45 I 102.62 Sewer Lateral 45 I 102.62 S - Other Plumbina and Gas Insoectlons (oer hour) 60.00 I 136.83 )> "tJ "tJ CD ::J C. x. I MAXIMUS, Inc. Page2of3 ~ o I .j:> I'.) City of Chula Vista MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES Planning & Building Department-Building Division Estimated Actual Unit Cost. Time based on a per- Fee Types (in minutes) minute rat. of $ 2.28 ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES Stand Alone Electrical Plan Check houl1\/f-ate\ 60.00 $ 136.83 $ - Temnorarv Power Pole 4' $ 102.62 Temnorarv or Permanent Service Pedestal 4' $ 102.62 Temoorarv Liahtino Sustem 4' $ 102.62 TerTlOorarv Power on a Permanent Base 4' $ 102.62 CATV Electrical Meter Enclosure wI or wlo nas 4' $ 102.62 New Electric Meter 4' . 102.62 Uoarade of Existino Electrical Service 4' $ 102.62 Reseltinn of Each Electrical Meter 4' $ 102.62 Overhead to Undernround Conversion 7' $ 171.04 Miscellaneous Wirinn/Conduit line!. mechanical annaratus1 7S $ 171.04 $ - Other Electricallnsnections (ner hour\ 60.00 $ 136.63 $ - )> -0 -0 CD :0 0- x. :r: MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 3 of 3 ~ o I .j:>o (.0) City of Chula Vista POTENTIAL FEE SCHEDULE FOR MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS Planning & Building Department-Building Division Intake and Plan Check Actual Inspection Total Actual Work Item Unit Cosl Actual Cost Cost Standard Hourly Rate $189 $189 $189 Antenna Dish>2f1 each $426.04 $378.70 $805 Cellular/Mobile Phone, free-standing each $426.04 $378.70 $805 - Cellular/Mobile Phone, allached to buildIng each $426.04 $378.70 $805 Equipment Shelter (Jarger than 1000 sf uses New up to 1000 sf, Construction Table) each $520.71 $473.38 $994 Awning/Canopy (supported by building) - Residential each $520.71 $189.35 $710 Awning/Canopy (supported by building) - Commercial each $804.74 $568.05 $1,373 Balcony addition each $615.39 $56B.05 $1,183 Carport each $615.39 $378.70 $994 Certificate of Occupancy each $94.11 $94.68 $189 Close Existing Openings Interior wall each $284.03 $189.35 $473 Exterior wall each $264.03 $189.35 $473 Commercial Coach (per unit) each unit $520.71 $378.70 $899 Deck M City Standard Design first 300 sf $331.36 $264.03 $615 Deck ea add'l 1 DO sf $47.34 $47.34 $95 Deck ~ Special Design first 300 sf $804.74 $378.70 $1,183 Deck ea add'1100 sf $47.34 $47.34 $95 Demolition Interior each $142.01 $189.35 $331 Exterior each $236.69 $189.35 $426 Door - New door (structural shear walllmasonry) each $815.39 $284.03 $899 Replacement Job Card each $31.62 $94.68 $126 Fence or Freestanding Wall (non~masonry) up to 100 l.t. $142.01 $189.35 $331 Each addillonal1 DO If each 100 i.f. $0.00 $47.34 $47 Fence or Freestanding Walt (masonry) Masonry, Standard up 10 100 l.t. $142.01 $284.03 $426 Each additional 100 If each 100 !.f. $0.00 $47.34 $47 Masonry, Special Design each 100 !.f. $473.38 $378.70 $852 Each additional 100 If each 100 !.f. $0.00 $94.68 $95 Fireplace Masonry & Special Design each $568.05 $568.05 $1,136 Pre-Fabricated/Metal each $378.70 $378.70 $757 }> -0 -0 '" ::J C. x' I MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 1 of5 C) I .j:>. .j:>. City of Chula Vista POTENTIAL FEE SCHEDULE FOR MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS Planning & Building Department-Building Division ~ Intake and Plan Check Actual Inspection Total Actual Work Item Unit Coat Actual Cost Cost Flag Pole flrstpoleJea $331.36 $189.35 $521 each add'[ pole each $31.62 $47.34 $79 Lighting pole firstpoleJea $284.03 $284.03 $568 each add'[ pole each $15.72 $28.40 $44 Manufactured Home on Continuous Footing each $568.05 $378.70 $947 Modular Structures each $662.73 $378.70 $1,041 Move-on House each $757.40 $757.40 $1,515 Partition - Commercial, Interior (up 10 30 U.) up to 30 I.f. $331.36 $189.35 $521 Additional partition each 30 I.t. $94.68 $47.34 $142 Partition - Residential. Interior (up to 30 I.f.) up to 30 1.1. $331.36 $189.35 $521 Additional partition each 30 I.f. $47.34 $47.34 $95 Patio Cover/Covered Porch - Standard Wood frame up to 300 s.t. $236.69 $284.03 $521 Metal frame up to 300 s.t. $236.69 $189.35 $428 Other frame up to 300 s.t. $236.69 $568.05 $805 Additional DaUo each 300 s.f. $0.00 -$47.34 $47 -- Enclosed, wood frame up to 300 s.f. $473.38 $378.70 $852 Enclosed, metal frame up to 300 s.f. $473.38 $189.35 $663 Enclosed, other frame up to 300 s.t. $473.38 $284.03 $757 Additional enclosed patio each 300 s.f. $94.68 $47.34 $142 Pallo Cover/Covered Pnrch ~ Special Wood trame up to 300 s.t. $331.36 $378.70 $710 Metal frame up to 300 s.f. $426.04 $378.70 $805 Other frame up to 300 s.f. $426.04 $757.40 $1,183 Additional oatio each 300 d. $94.68 $47.34 $142 Enclosed, wood frame up to 300 s.t. $473.38 $473.38 $947 Enclosed, metal trame up to 300 s.f. $473.38 $284.03 $757 Enclosed, other trame up to JOO s.t. $473.38 $378.70 $852 Additional enclosed patio each 300 s.t. $94.68 $47.34 $142 Pholovoltalc System - ResIdential each $568.05 $378.70 $947 Photovottaic System - Commercial 1 to 16 panels each $710.06 $568.05 $1,278 each addiUonal 8 panels each add'l $47.34 $94.68 $142 Stucco Applications up 10 400 s.f. $189.35 $284.03 $473 Addillonal Stucco Application each 400 s.f. $0.00 $47.34 $47 )> "0 "0 CD ::J a. x. I MAXIMUS. Inc. Page 2 of 5 City of Chul. Vist. POTENTIAL FEE SCHEDULE FOR MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS Planning & Building Department-Building Division ~ Intake and Plan Check Actual Inspection Total Actual Work Item Unit Cost Actual Cost Cost Retaining Wall (concrete or masonry) - Standard 4 ftortess up to 50 I.f. $284.03 $378.70 $663 Additional retaining wall each 50 I.f. $0.00 $47.34 $47 4ft-8ft up to 50 I.t. $426.04 $568.05 $994 Additional retaining wall each 50 I.f. $0.00 $94.68 $95 Retaining Wall (concrete or masonry) - Special Design 4"ftorless up to 50 !.t. $378.70 $568.05 $947 Additional retalnino wall each 50 I.f. $0.00 $47.34 $47 4ft-B ft up to 50 1.1. $520.71 $757.40 $1,278 Additional retaining wall each 50 1.1. $0.00 $94.68 $95 8ft-12ft up to 50 U. $615.39 $1,230.78 $1,846 Additional retaining wall each 50 Lt. $0.00 $94.68 $95 >12 ft up 10 50 I.f. $804.74 $1,514.80 $2,320 Additional retainIng wall each 50 IJ. $0.00 $94.68 $95 Remodel - Residential Less than 300 sJ. up to 300 s.f. $662.73 $568.05 $1,231 Kitchen up to 300 s.t. $710.06 $568.05 $1,278 Bath up to 300 s.f. $662.73 $568.05 $1,231 Additional remodel each 300 s.l. $47.3' $169.35 $237 Re-roof up to 100 s.f. $169.35 $189.35 $379 Additional Re-root each 100 sJ. $0.00 $23.67 $24 Root Structure Replacement up to 100 s.t. $568.05 $284.03 $852 Additional roof structure replacement each 100 s.t. $94.68 $47.34 $142 Room Addition - First Story Up to 300 s.l. up to 300 s.t. $757.40 $946.75 $1,704 Additional room addition each 300 s.t. $94.68 $378.70 $473 Room Addition - Multi-story Up to 300 s.f. up to 300 s.f. $604.74 $1,136.10 $1,941 Additional room additlon each 300 s.f. $94.66 $378.70 $473 Sauna - steam each $378.70 $284.03 $663 Siding Stone and Brick Veneer (Interior or exterior) up to 400 s.t. $284.93 $189.35 $473 AnOther up to 400 d. $284.03 $189.35 $473 Additional siding each 400 s.f. $47.34 $47.34 $95 )> "0 "0 CD ::J a. x' I o I ~ U1 MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 3 of 5 City of Chula Vista POTENTIAL FEE SCHEDULE FOR MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS Planning & Building Department-Building Division ~ Intake and Plan Check Actual Inspection Total Actual Work Item Unit Cost Actual Cost Cost Signs Directional each $189.35 $378.70 $568 Each additional Directional Sign each $31.62 $47.34 $79 GroundlRooflProjecting Signs each $236.69 $378.70 $615 Monumental SIgn each $615.39 $378.70 $994 Subdivision Directional Sign each $236.69 $378.70 $615 WalVAwnlnQ Sign, Non~EJectric each $284.03 $189.35 $473 Wall,Electric each $284.03 $189.35 $473 Pole Sign each $426.04 $378.70 $805 Skylight less than 10 sf first skylight $284.03 $189.35 $473 Less than 10 sf each add', skyliaht $0.00 $47.34 $47 Greater than 10 sf each $378.70 $189.35 $568 Greater than 10 sf each add', skylight $0.00 $47.34 $47 Spa or Hot Tub (Pre-fabricated) each $331.36 $189.35 $521 Slalrs - First Flight firstfllahl $378.70 $189.35 $568 Each addltlonal flight per flight $94.68 $94.68 $189 Storage Racks 0-8' high (up to 100 If) first 100 If $710.06 $189.35 $899 each additional 100 If each 1 00 If $47.34 $47.34 $95 over 8' high (up to 1.00 If) first 100 If $804.74 $284.03 $1,089 each additional 1 00 If each 100 If $47.34 $47.34 $95 Swimming PooVSpa (Master Plan\ VinyHined each $284.03 $473.38 $757 Fiberglass each $284.03 $473.38 $757 Gunite each $378.70 $662.73 $1,041 Commercial pool (up 10 800 sO each $710.06 $852.08 $1,562 Commercial pool (over 800 sf) each $804.74 $1,136.10 $1,941 Window or SlIdJng Glass Door RepatrlReplace up 10 10 $378.70 $284.03 $663 Add'l Repair/Replace each add'J 5 $47.34 $47.34 $95 New window lstructural) each $378.70 $189.35 $568 Add'l New window (structural) each $47.34 $47.34 $95 Product Review per hour $189.35 $0.00 $189 Disabled Access Compliance Inspection per hour $0.00 $189.35 $189 )> "0 "0 CD :J "- x. I C) I ~ m MAXIM US, Inc. Page 4 of 5 City of Chula VIsta POTENTIAL FEE SCHEDULE FOR MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS Planning & Building Department-Building Division ~ Intake and Plan Check Actual Inspection Total Actual Work Item Unit Cost Actual Cost Cost Supplemental Plan Check Fee (first 1/2 hour) each $142.D1 $0,00 $142 Each Additional 112 hour (o.r portion thereon.. per 112 hour $94.68 $0.00 $95 Supplemental Inspection Fee (first 1/2 ho~r) each $47.34 $94.68 $142 Each Addilional1/2 hour (or portion thereof) per 1/2 hour $0.00 $94.68 $95 Emergency Call-Out (Non-Scheduled) 4 Hours $0.00 $757.40 $757 After Hours Call-Out (Scheduled) 2 Hours $0.00 $378.70 $379 Fire Damage Report Review each $189.35 $0.00 $189 Private Sewer, Waler, Storm Drains and/or Site LIghting ~"-1o~50,000 each or % $1,278.11 $946.75 $2,225 $50,001 to $100,000 each or % $1,372.79 $2,272.20 $3,645 - $100,001 to $250,000 each or % $1,562.14 $3,029.60 $4,592 ----- $250,001 to $500,000 each or % $1,751.49 $3,787.00 $5,538 $500,001 to $1M each or % $2,082.85 $5,680.50 $7,763 >$1M each or % $2,272.20 $7,574.00 $9,846 -- ANNUAUNON-FEE RELATED Mobile Home Park Permits - Fees set by state. annual $94,864.35 $110,675.08 $205,539 - CIP Support annual $25,183.55 $39,290.13 $64,474 Re-Org Budgeted Staff Support to Comm Dev annual $11,007.86 $0.00 $11,008 Re-Grg Budgeted Staff Support to Fire annual $11,007.86 $0.00 $11,008 Re-Org Budgeted Staff Support to Planning annual $165,117.93 $0.00 $165,118 Re-Org Budgeted Staff Support to Englneerlng annual $44,031.45 $0.00 $44,031 o I -1>0 ...... )> "U "U CD ::J 0- x' I MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 5 015 FINAL REPORT CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING AND BUILDING USER FEE STUDIES JANUARY 18, 2007 ~~f~ ~ ---- ........""""'-........""'- MAXIMUS HeLPENG GOVERNMENT SERVE THE PEOPLE" ellY OF CHULA VISTA 10-48 REPORT CONTENTS TRANSMITTAL LETTER EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ......................................................................................................1 Background and Approach .........................................................................................1 User Fee Definition .............. ....... ...... ................ .............................. ......... ................... 2 Revenue Results ................... ...... ............ .............. ...................... ..... .... .......................2 USER FEE SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY.........................................................................4 Scope ........ ................................ ...... .......... ................................ ..... ........ ............... .......4 Methodology. ............................ ...... ....... ...................... ........ .............. .................. ........4 Process Analytics Model ............................................................................................5 NEXU S Model............................................................................................................. 6 DEPARTMENT -SPECIFIC FINDINGS AND RESULTS ........................................................8 Planning Division .................. ...... ................ ...... ................ ...... .......... .......... .......... ......8 Planning Division Findings .............................................................,...........................8 Bu i1ding Division .................... ......... ......... ........... ............................... .......... ................9 Building Division Findings ........................................................................................12 USER FEE CONCEPTS AND IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES......................................14 General Fee Principals .............................................................................................14 implementation Strategies.... ................ ...... ............. .................. ......... ..... ........ ........ .14 Factors Limiting Full Cost Recovery ........................................................................16 FUTURE UPDATES ............... ....................................................................... ................... ..19 Multi- Vear Fees .........................................................................................................19 CORPORATE BACKGROUND AND EXPERIENCE...........................................................20 APPENDIX 1: PLANNING FEE SCHEDULE Planning Fee Schedule APPENDIX 2: BUILDING FEE SCHEDULES New Construction Fee Schedule New Construction Revenues MP&E Fee Schedule Miscellaneous Fee Schedule 10-49 MAXIMUS HEI.J>lNG GOVERNMENT SERVE THE PEOPLE- January 18, 2007 Mr. Jim Sandoval, Director Planning and Building Department City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910-2631 Re: Final Report-Planning and Bullding Fee User Study Dear Mr. Sandoval: On behalf of MAXIM US, I am pleased to present you with this final report of the Planning and Building Fee Studies. Working as partners with the City, we identified all costs associated with the City's planning and building processes, and allocated those costs fairly and appropriately to all of the Department's plan check and inspection activities. Further, we included Citywide overhead amounts and other departmental support costs to ensure that all applicable costs have been incorporated into the fee study. Significantly, we implemented the NEXUS fee model for building activities, which moves the City away from a valuation-based fee schedule to one that is more legally defensible, and is based entirely on the cost of providing services. We should also note that the anticipated update to Citywide overhead rates was unavailable at the time of this study: once those rates are produced, the City may raise rates further to capture those increased costs. Among the significant results of the study are the following: . The City has the opportunity to raise an additional $860,350 annually in Planning fee revenue-an amount that the General Fund is currently subsidizing the development community. . Similarly, the City may raise an additional $2,500,300 annually in Building fee revenue, which the General Fund is currently subsidizing the building community. We want to thank your staff who participated in this study, particularly Brad Remp, Jim Hare, and Bob McSeveney, all of whom were instrumental in driving this project to completion. Sincerely, /~c~ /~ ../ Brian A. Foster, Senior Manager MAXlMUS Financial Services Division 4320 Auburn Boulevard, Suite 2000 Sacramento, CA 95841-4154 Phone: (916) 485-8102, exl. 305 Fax: (916) 485-0111 E-mail: brianfoster@maxirnus.com 10-50 City of Chula Vista Planning and Building User Fee Studies *' MAXIMUS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY BACKGROUND AND APPROACH The City of Chula Vista engaged MAXIMUS to conduct detailed cost of services studies for the City's Planning and Building fees. MAXIMUS conducted these two studies sequentially, but completed them simultaneously, as each division had costs associated with fees in the other division. COST STUDY Through this study, we determined the full cost of services offered by the specific areas for which user fees are currently being charged or could be charged. Full cost, as used in this report, includes all legitimate direct and indirect costs associated with providing each service, including direct support costs from other divisions, plus department and Citywide overhead. The purpose of this study is to determine the full cost of operations and the maximum fees that may be assessed. This study is not an "audit" of the processes and procedures employed by the various divisions; rather, it is a snapshot of the current full cost by service and/or activity. From this vantage point, there are no "good" or "bad" results, only a determination of current levels of expenditures according to the overall direction of the City Council. Cost determinations result from an essentially simple formula: multiply a productive hourly rate by the number of hours required to complete the task. It is the correct identification of the underlying components of rates and hours that gives the analysis structure and validity. MAXIMUS uses specially designed, proprietary software to ensure that all operational components are identified and incorporated into the fmal determination. The methodology emulates the principles of Activity Based Costing (ABC), which provide for the identification of work components/activities, and the assignment of dollar values to the resulting time allotments. With the costs now identified, the fmal objective of the study is the presentation of the results to the City Council for their decision. Cities typically choose to recover full costs of their activities where an applicant for a discretionary service will obtain a specific monetary or personal benefit. The fee schedules incorporated herein show the maximum fee levels that the City may assign to each fee. The City Council may set the adopted fee levels at any amount less than those shown. The City is in the process of updating its overhead cost allocation plan. Unfortunately, those new rates were unavailable at the time that this study was conducted. The new rates are likely to be higher than the current rates. Therefore, the City Council may wish to revisit the maximum planning and building fees charged to the development community once those new rates are published. Page 1 10-51 City of Chula Vista Planning and Building User Fee Studies *' MAXIMUS USER FEES User fees recover the cost of doing business in exchange far the personal or financial benefit received. REVENUE OPPORTUNITY The City may raise $3.36 million annually through full cost recovery fees. USER FEE DEFINITION It is important to understand the essential concept of a USer fee-as opposed to other governmental revenue sources: A user fee is an amaunt charged for a governmental activity or service that is performed at the request of, and specifically for, a particular individual, business, or group, as opposed to a service for the community as a whole. An example of the former is a request for a zoning change to initiate a new business. The applicant will be gaining a specific economic benefit from that zaning change not shared by the community at large. An example of the laller is police or fire protection, which is considered a community-wide activity and is supported by taxation. REVENUE RESULTS The results of this study revealed significant opportunities to increase revenues through user fees. Specifically, opportunities come from a variety of factors, which are commonly found within these studies: · Increasing Productive Hourly Rates to reflect full cost · Acknowledging the total effort required to provide a service from the perspective ofa Citywide of service delivery (cross-departmental support) . Adding new fees In nearly all areas studied, we found an overall current subsidy provided by the City to the fee-payers, Le., the City is charging less than the full actual cost of providing services. Based on conversations with staff, these subsidies reflect a mixture of both intended and unintended choices. The results of the analysis demonstrate the full cost of providing each of the fee- related services included in the study, estimated revenue from the current fees, and the resulting current subsidy. A summary of the City's revenue opportunities is provided in the table below: Division Planning Buildin~ Total Revenue Potential Summary Current Full Cost Revenue Revenue $3,158,167 $ 4,018,516 3,756,704 6,256,997 $6,914,871 $10,275,513 Annual Subsidy $ 860,349 2,500,293 $3,360,642 As shown above, the City is expending $10.3 million on user fee services, while it recovers only $6.9 million, a net subsidy of$3.4 million from the General Fund to the development community. MAXlMUS typically recommends that City Councils establish user fee levels at 100 percent recovery rates. If the City Council were to adopt a full recovery fee schedule, and if the City were to Page 2 10-52 City of Chula Vista Planning and Building User Fee Studies *' MAXIMUS experience the same level of service activity as it has in the past, then the City would realize annual revenue increases of approximately $3.4 million. Please note that the Current Revenue figures in the table above will not match actual fiscal year revenue, as they were computed by multiplying the current fee levels by the sampled unit volume to yield the full cost model. We do not use actual revenue in our equations due to timing issues-permit activity is often recorded towards the end of one fiscal year, but activity commences in the following fiscal year. Our approach provides an apples-to-apples match-up for analytical purposes. The individual fee levels, along with the full cost recovery rates, are shown in the Appendix. The remainder of this report details the approach, methodologies, and results of the MAXIMUS study. The data sets that comprise the user fee models are on file with the Planning and Building Department. Page 3 10-53 City of Chula Vista Planning and Building User Fee Studies *' MAXIMUS USER FEE SCOPE AND METHODOLOGY SCOPE The principal goal ofthese studies was to calculate the full cost of providing user fee services, including all direct, indirect, and support costs. Secondary objectives of the study included: · Structuring the fees to accurately reflect the processes and organization of the divisions. · SimplifYing the fee schedules to make them easier to implement and understand. · Ensuring a connection between fees and the cost of services provided. · Ensuring that the fees are logical and defensible. · Providing a revenue projection based on the full recovery of City costs. The studies employed our rigorous, proven project approaches and analytical methodologies to evaluate the departments' costs for user fee-related services. We based the analysis on existing data, when available, and on estimates provided by the respective departments. The study focused on the actual cost of services, as the departments currently provide them. We did not examine or evaluate the effectiveness, efficiency, or value of the departments' programs, services, or operations. In short, we studied the cost of operations as they are, not as they might be. Departments and divisions analyzed included the following: . Planning . Building · Engineering (costs, as provided, in support of Planning and Building) · Fire (costs, as provided, in support of Planning and Building) METHODOLOGY The approach, philosophy, and methodology of User Fee Studies are as important as the fmal outcome. While the calculation of a cost of a specific user fee is important, it is equally important that this number be defensible, clearly understood by staff, and useful for improving long-term performance. Our costing methodologies meet these criteria by: · Providing cost calculations that are easily defensible. · Involving staff in a higWy collaborative fashion. · Developing costs from the "ground up." · IdentifYing all costs associated with fees. · Projecting revenue at "full cost." Page 4 10-54 City of Chula Vista Planning and Building User Fee Studies *' MAXIMUS . Including Advanced Methodologies-NEXUS and Process Analytics. . IdentifYing pricing issues that will impact operational efficiencies. . Including an implementation strategy. . Laying the groundwork for operational improvement. Our costing process is composed of two computer models-Process Analytics and NEXUS--each of which incorporates the principles of Activity Based Costing. (We use different models due to the specific analytical requirements of each fee type.) We used the Process Analytics model for Planning fees and the NEXUS model for Building fees. PROCESS ANAL YTICS MODEL At its core, Process Analytics seeks to document the actual, full cost of activities, products, and services, as well as to provide an understanding of what drives those costs. With this knowledge, the organization is in a better position to deliver services faster, cheaper, and more effectively. In the MAXlMUS solution, our Process Analytics delivers the initial knowledge, and our Performance Analytics delivers potential solutions. A typical set of "cost drivers" is shown in the following graphic: Process Components Pre-Application Review Application Intake Application Review Set Conditions of Approval Re.,;ew by Planning Commission Conditional Use Permit In this engagement, MAXIMUS worked with staffto identifY and define those work processes that produce City services. For each staff member, we developed hourly rates that were based on true available net time(s), and which included all direct and proportionate indirect costs. City staff identified specific time for each activity to each fee or service area. As an example of the results of this process, the times and dollars associated with Administrative Conditional Use Permits are presented in the table below: Page 5 10-55 City of Chula Vista Planning and Building User Fee Studies *' MAXIMUS NEXUS FEES Building Fees will be based on square footage and type of construction, not construction value. Process Times/Cost Example Administrative Conditional Use Permit We then add to the costs above the Planning Division's internal overhead and cross-departmental support costs to establish the full cost fee structure. NEXUS MODEL Building fees have traditionally been set based on structural valuation. This method is exceedingly difficult to correlate to services provided and the resultant fee for that service. To provide our clients with a workable, defensible building fee schedule, MAXIMUS developed a specialized application for the determination of building inspection and plan check costs: the MAXIMUS model. NEXUS complies with California's (and other states') legal imperatives calling for a direct relationship (nexus) between fees levied and services provided (California Government Code 66014 and California Attorney General's Opinion 92-506). NEXUS calculates plan checking, inspection, "trades" components, and miscellaneous fees based on a combination of productive hourly rates and standard times to complete tasks, scaled and modified by varying square footage and construction types. This approach represents a distinct change in fee calculation and administration. Assuming adoption of this approach by the City, an applicant for a new construction project will no longer provide staff with the estimated value of the project (which can vary significantly based on the cost of materials, current economy, etc.). Rather, the new fee will be based on the square footage of the project and the type of construction (e.g., residential home, office building, hazardous materials building). The NEXUS model determines the appropriate fee, based on typical square footage sizes and 100 feet increments. The fee will recapture all plan checking, Page 6 10-56 City of Chula Vista Planning and Building User Fee Studies *' MAXIMUS inspection, and mechanical, plumbing, and electrical (MP&E) costs for that particular project. We developed other fee tables to accommodate various "miscellaneous" and MP&E activities. The fee schedules are provided in the Appendix to this report. Page 7 10-57 City of Chula Vista Planning and Building User Fee Studies *' MAXIMUS DEPARTMENT-SPECIFIC FINDING AND RESULTS PLANNING DIVISION The Planning Division is responsible for assisting the community in planning for its future by preparing, compiling, and disseminating information on land use, housing, transportation, and other issues that affect the City; facilitating the public process through which plans and policies are adopted; processing development applications; making recommendations on long-range planning issues and specific development proposals; and conducting environmental review consistent with State Law. As previously described, we used the Process Analytics methodology to calculate the Planning Division's cost of services.. Specifically, the project involved six steps: · Identify division-specific processes. In addition, each process was defmed so that all staff estimated their time according to the same understanding of what defmed an activity. · Acquire time estimates. Planning staff estimated the time required to complete each activity relative to each service. These estimates resulted in a comprehensive study of time utilization for the entire division. For quality purposes, a check was made to verify that estimated activity time was relatively equal to actual time available for productive work. · Input labor and budget data. Computerized financial models created in Microsoft Excel assisted this project. Into this model, time estimates were uploaded, along with all direct and indirect financial expenses. · Review of existing fees, adding new fees and eliminating otbers. This step was actually a subset of each and every part of the project. Throughout the project, services were evaluated for current applicability to the City. · Calculate the Productive Hourly Rate. For lbose services that cannot be calculated wilb a flat fee, an hourly rate was established. This rate calculates the cost of departmental time, less vacation time, sick leave time, etc., and then removes additional hours for activities that cannot be cost recovered, such as administration and public information. These costs determined lbe fully-loaded hourly rate that will be charged to users of Planning services when a flat fee is not possible. · Project revenues. Once the cost of individual fees was calculated, revenue estimates were prepared to compare revenue at the current fee levels with the potential revenue if fees were set at full cost. PLANNING DIVISION FINDINGS The City currently provides a significant subsidy for lbe Planning Division's user-based fees, based on lborough analyses offull cost models. Specifically, we Page 8 10-58 City of Chula Vista Planning and Building User Fee Studies *' MAXIMUS found an $860,000 annual subsidy in Planning services (including support from other departments), based on full costs. The City's current fee schedule would generate approximately $3,158,000, while the full cost recovery model would generate approximately $4,019,000 annually. A detailed fee schedule, showing both current and projected fees, is shown in the Appendix. As noted earlier, we built up the time/cost of the Planning Division based on the principles of Activity Based Costing. This process entailed establishing times per activity, based on the major work efforts involved in "producing" the service. The results of the distributions are depicted graphically follows: (note, time spent on internal preparation of the long range plan are not included in the calculation). Activity Cost Analysis $- ::f. .~ .& ~~ ;# ,,<f ,,~ ~d ~ ',,~ ~ 0 ~ '2t ~ <; ,1;.."" ~<f ~ ~'I) 00~,fP~ &,# ~ 'lI~ ~'li- ~ ~~ &~ r:P~u" q,<"& '1-.0<1- 9<0 'ff' ~~,;f(1$f ,,~o~,.,..;:.,~ ~~ ,&<!>q::~~/ij e-b-X:-~~~~~#':(;~ ~<$"O:J~...~'~ 'v~O<;' 0i~ fJ~~~~~,:;;q"'o~<?,~~ '$'O:J '~~0.~ ''l!e;. '5S r:Y-::i (j' ~ ~.s ~0 ~0 q &-~ ~ fl 'b~ ,:;; "tof:' ,j;.~ ~'t>,'SJv~ q"'O;; <;::-b>?'.~ .~ q" <(..... ~0 va- ~~O:J G e:,\f' ';/,".? f!:'0" .,:;; q" '" "*,..s' ~'I) 0' ~" '11> ~0?::> ~ C;~ r:F' c:P ,i? <) </,<,0 ~X-0 f!:'.,J> VJ.7J o<!Q v qO~ ~5~O .f:-o.,<f!- ff?:-"'" ~~ 1.-o~ C:J.J~ 00 c; 0," ~v BUILDING DIVISION The Building Division is responsible for the issuance of building permits, reviewing building plans for code and safety compliance, and providing inspection services. Page 9 10-59 City of Chula Vista Planning and Building User Fee Studies *' MAXlMUS The City currently establishes building permit and plan check fees in the same manner as most municipalities have historically done-by basing fees on a modified version of rates included in the Uniform Building Code (UBC), and on construction valuation tables published periodically by the International Conference of Building Officials (ICBO). Consequently, Chula Vista's Building fee revenue largely correlates with construction valuation. Our NEXUS methodology builds a cost structure based upon establishing time estimates for each phase of project plan check and inspection, and for each building's type and size. The result for new construction permits is a unit cost per square foot, and in the case of miscellaneous permits and sub-trade items, a cost per unit. The resulting fees are fair to both the applicant and the jurisdiction: they are definitive, practical, and legal. As part of our analysis, we aggregated Building Division staff hour allocations by type of activity. Specifically, we aggregated staff time across the following four categories: . New Construction Plan Check . New Construction Inspection . Miscellaneous Items . MP&E's (Mechanical, Planning & Electrical) The chart below shows the equivalent full-time staff devoted to each of these four activities. Page 10 10-60 City of Chula Vista Planning and Building User Fee Studies *' MAXIMUS FTE Use by Activity Type Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) Staff 10.0 16.0 14.0 12.0 cr v~1l) ''!f)<::- s::. C? ~r.:, ~.......q; ':o.<;:-~<f i:1...,~0 R*'C:J ;:,0/ ,/ ".qp ~ ~,.':>G }i~'o ~'li f:Jv v- v'?J Q~ ~~ _i:~ C; cP ..... ",,0~ 0~ '" The chart above indicates that the Building Division currently allocates approximately 4.5 FTE to New Construction Plan Check, 15.5 FTE to New Construction Inspections, 8.7 FTE to Miscellaneous Items, and 1.1 FTE to MP&E's. It should be noted that these staff full-time equivalents are already adjusted to take into account vacations, sick leave, meeting times, etc. Therefore, the actual number of persons assigned to each of those activities is significantly greater. Within New Construction, we also broke down the staff allocations by residential versus commercial activity (it is impossible to allocate Miscellaneous and MP&E time to residential versus commercial, since permit data are not tabulated in that manner). Of the 20.0 FTE working on New Construction projects, 14.4 FTE are allocated to residential construction, while 5.6 FTE are allocated to commercial construction. These staff allocations are depicted in the graph below. Page 11 10-61 City of Chula Vista Planning and Building User Fee Studies *' MAXlMU$ FTE Use-New Construction (Commercial vs. Residential) 10.0 ~~ ./1'''' '" <(-0 .r/ ,,0 ",," i!i' 0'" c; 0~ '" 16.0 14.0 Full~ Tlme Equivalent (FTE) Staff 12.0 6~ 0' ",'" J'O '0'" 6' ~"" 0'" C; .~ '" BUILDING DIVISION FINDINGS The cost analysis of Building fee-related services indicated that the Division is providing a considerable subsidy to the building cornmunity--currentIy, the City is recovering less than 60 percent of its cost of providing building-related services. The City's current General Fund subsidy is provided for all building fee categories: $1.53 million in new construction, $0.87 million in miscellaneous items, and $0.10 million in MP&E's, for a total of$2.5 million. These figures are shown in the table below: a.ijl!dlri9, F" G'!-tegcny Current PiJblici $u_~ldyt Su"lus $. 1,535:499 $. 8tj7,9?& $. 516817 $' 2;500293' 65.1% 48.4% 44.5% 60.0% New CCinstri..ictidli Mise: Items MPS.~;s TotiifRevenues Page 12 10-62 City of Chula Vista Planning and Building User Fee Studies *' MAXIMUS The distribution of potential revenue witbin tbe Building Division is also presented graphically below: Full Fee Revenue, by Type $500.000 ,s-~ '1:-'" v' ~i;j <(,~ !1.'h' ~ $4,500,000 $4,000,000 $3,500,000 $3,000,000 $2,500,000 $2,000,000 $1,500,000 $1,000,000 ~o<::- .,>V ei' 0" ~c; ",'" The graph above shows tbat tbe clear majority oftbe Building Division's revenue (and work activity) is in New Construction, while Miscellaneous Items comprise a little less tban balf of New Construction's total. MP&E revenues are a minor component to tbe Division's revenues (tbey are already incorporated into New Construction for new buildings). The Appendix includes a full set of fees, by construction type. It might be worth noting, by way of example, tbat a typical 3,500 square foot Residential home (UBC Type R-3) currently pays approximately $4,509 in fees. Under the full cost recovery model, tbe fees would increase to only $5,018-a modest increase. Fees for otber sizes and types of construction would increase more, on average, tban tbis typical single family home. Page 13 10-63 City of Chula Vista Planning and Building User Fee Studies *' MAXIMUS USER FEE CONCEPTS AND IMPLEMENTATION STRA TEGrES GENERAL FEE PRINCIPLES Local governments are funded from a variety of sources, primarily taxes, subventions, fees, special charges, fines, and grants. As the traditional provider of basic services, cities and counties are constantly struggling with securing sufficient funding to pay for the services expected, demanded, andlor desired by the citizenry. Many local government services are "global" in nature (e.g., police and fire protection, library, recreation, open space, etc.). Other services benefit a particular segment of the population, most often providing a direct monetary or personal benefit to the recipient. It is in this latter group that subsidy and recovery issues are brought to the fore. Given the nature of government financing, if the costs of providing specialized services are not fully recovered, there must be a decrease in funding for other public good activities. User fee services are those services provided by a governmental agency on behalf of a private citizen or group. The assumption underlying most fee recornmendations is that the costs of services benefiting individuals, and not society as a whole, should be borne by the individual receiving the benefit. Setting user fees, therefore, is equivalent to establishing prices for services. (Governmental agencies are not allowed to make a profit in the provision of services.) For most fees, governments typically set the fee level to recover the cost of providing each service. It is generally accepted that recovery of costs should be in direct proportion to the individual or specific gain for services. For exarople, if a developer wants to rezone farm land for a housing development, the City may not want to charge that business a fee less than full cost, since to do otherwise would require a subsidy paid by the general citizenry (who do not share in the particular benefit). Where new development causes an increase in infrastructure requirements, that increase should logically be shared pro rata with the existing area, proportionate to the degree that the new development benefits from the infrastructure. Conversely, a recreation prograro could logically be subsidized from the general tax base in order to promote the overall well-being of the general public, or to achieve specific socia-economic objectives. IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGIES There is a natural reluctance to raising fees. The community has grown accustomed to the existing fee level, and generally has a vested interest in maintaining the status quo. Increased fees absorb otherwise-committed dollars. Politically, there are winners and losers associated with any change in fees. Page 14 10-64 City of Chula Vista Planning and Building User Fee Studies - MAXIMUS Viewed from the vantage point of the average constituency wanting a wide range of governmental services, setting fees at or close to full cost recovery (recreation excepted) can be acceptable when the following can be demonstrated: . Persons or groups not sharing in a specific benefit should or will not share in that cost via a subsidy; . The fee is for a required service that benefits only the applicant; and . The applicant's desired service level is achieved. The issue of fee subsidization is relatively simple: someone must pay. When governments subsidize activities instead of recovering full costs of operation, there is less money for the jurisdiction to accomplish other goals. Typically, the public's desires and demands for services outstrip the government's ability to raise sufficient funding to provide those services. While governments typically choose to subsidize certain activities for the greater public good, e.g. recreation activities for youth, seniors, and the disadvantaged, ifthey also subsidize activities like planning appeals (which benefit only the applicant), they will have fewer dollars for general activities. The following matrix graphically portrays the various types of governmental services and the logical payers of those services. User Fee PaYilr Matrix (WhO Benefits?) (service Type) Gaxes vs. Fee~ Community Public 100% Taxes (e.g" Police Patrol) Primarily the Public/Private Community, with (e.g., Fire Primarily Taxes, less Individual Some Fees Benefit Suppression) Primarily the Private/Public Primarily Fees, Individual, with less (e.g., Community Some Taxes Community Benefit Services) Individual Benefit Private Only (e.g., Land Use, 100% Fees Building Permits) As shown above, police patrol would logically be funded by taxes, while a private development subdivision would be funded by user fees. Our experience is that most applicants for planning and building services are more concerned with the quality of the service than an increase in the operating fee-time is money to the applicant. While not embraced joyfully, fees raised to Page 15 10-65 City of Chula Vista Planning and Building User Fee Studies *' MAXlMUS recover full costs are invariably accepted as a part of doing business, as long as the value to the applicant is provided. FACTORS LIMITING FULL COST RECOVERY There are six factors that typically limit ajurisdiction's the full recovery of costs. All of these factors were evidenced in this study for the City of Chula Vista, as they are usually in other jurisdictions. All six factors were corrected or otherwise addressed in the recommended rate structures. The six factors are as follows: . Inaccurate labor rates · Reliance on time & materials (hourly) fees · Incomplete estimates of labor utilization . Incomplete fee schedules · Past practices to subsidize User Fees . Insufficient updates Each of these six factors is addressed in detail below. 1) Inaccurate Labor Rates One of the primary factors limiting the full recovery of costs is that labor rates do not capture 100 percent of costs. The following list includes costs that are generally not fully accounted for in rate calculations: · Annual accrual of sick leave . Annual holiday leave · Time associated with management leave · Time associated with routine management & staff meetings · Expenses associated with Citywide overhead (although the rates used are dated) · Expenses associated with divisional and/or departmental overhead · Expenses associated with administrative staff support 2) Reliance on Time & Materials (Hourly) Fees Theory would suggest that the most equitable way to charge a client for a service would be to track the total time and charge an hourly rate based on the personnel cost of the person(s) providing the service. The reality is that this system is flawed. Several factors make this system inappropriate: · Without a precise time tracking and automated tool that monitors 100 percent of staff time, times assigned to projects are nearly always underestimated. · Hourly rates are habitually too low and fail to capture the following: Page 16 10-66 City of Chula Vista Planning and Building User Fee Studies *' MAXIMUS . Overhead expenses, vacation, sick leave, holiday, and other "non- productive" time, and . Time spent on support activities such as counter duty, database maintenance, general administration, training, and meetings. . Divisions are typically not asked to set measurable objectives on billable hours that one might see in the private sector with similar professional disciplines. While not all of the factors have been observed in the City, in general, they all contribute to the under recovery of costs, where applicable. 3) Incomplete Estimates of Labor Utilization There are two primary reasons why estimates oflabor utilization for any given service are inaccurate, as follows: . They fail to identifY the work processes, activities, and tasks associated with the service. Therefore, estimates of time are typically underestimated by a significant margin. To address this problem, MAXIMUS takes an extra step to first identifY and define the work processes that actually produce City services. . They fail to capture cross-departmental support or system-wide labor utilization. These efforts were an important factor in reviewing City services, and every effort was made to identifY and capture these additional costs. 4) Incomplete Fee Schedules Outdated or incomplete fee schedules are often a primary reason why a City does not fully recover its costs. MAXIMUS spends additional time with each department to identifY those services that should be added to the fee schedule, those that should be deleted, and those that should be split into sub-categories to reflect more accurately the City's services. 5) Past Practices to Subsidize User Fees Many jurisdictions establish unwritten policies or encourage a practice of subsidizing user fees. Often, the objective is keep user fees low to encourage economic development. While there is little evidence that the level of user fees on the whole has any impact on economic development, the result of these policies or practices is often the inability of staff to keep up with workloads. As economic development occurs, the ability for the City to finance these services is severely constrained. 6) Insufficient Updates A common finding in our studies is the lack of a formal user fee update process. The traditional method of adding an inflationary increase, typically by the Page 17 10-67 City of Chula Vista Planning and Building User Fee Studies *' MAXIMUS Consumer Price Index (CPI), often fails after a year or two. Increases based on inflation fail to capture cost increases resulting from changing regulatory requirements and the associated changes in work processes. Page 18 10-68 City of Chula Vista Planning and Building User Fee Studies *' MAXIMUS FUTURE UPDATES MULTI-YEAR FEES MAXlMUS develops its fee analyses on the most accurate up-to-date budget data available. Once fee adjustments are implemented, we recommend updating the fee calculations periodically to account for changes in costs over time. The development and use of an automatic fee increase mechanism normally provides a level of convenience and efficiency, because staff do not have to recalculate cost recovery percentages each year. However, the use ofa sub-optimal approach can result in cost increases significantly outpacing actual cost (fee) increases. In the case of Chula Vista, there is another issue that is unrelated to typical inflationary adjustments: the update Citywide overhead rates. The City's current overhead rates are approximately three years old. Once updated, it is expected that overhead amounts will increase significantly. At that point, the City should consider rolling those amounts back into the model and re-calculating user fees. Such an approach would require public hearings twice over a relatively short period of time, so that impact should be considered as well. In general, to ensure that jurisdictions receive appropriate fee increases that reflect the actual growth in cost, MAXIMUS identified two alternatives: Alternative 1) Update the Fee Model Annually The most accurate method to ensure accurate fee increases is to recalculate fees based upon new staffing and expenditure figures each year. However, this approach would likely be the most time-consuming (and expensive) of the alternatives, as it requires significant financial analysis and a repeat of the approval process. Alternative 2) City Labor Costs (Recommended Alternative) Labor costs comprise the bulk of expenses for most government services, particularly plarming and building. Consequently, changes in labor costs drive the overall change in operating costs. To better recover increased costs, jurisdictions can insert into the rate schedule a fee increase factor that is based upon known and anticipated labor cost increases, such as programmed cost of living raises, association agreements, salary step increases, benefits increases, and other salary or benefit enhancements. Labor costs are generally easier to predict than most other costs, since most agencies have greater control over their internal costs. Furthermore, common CPI factors are not specific to the regional economies of many communities. As a result, MAXIMUS believes that an adjustment based on specific labor costs would be the most accurate indicator of overall operating cost increases. Page 19 10-69 City of Chula Vista Planning and Building User Fee Studies *' MAXIMUS MAXIMUS H~IN(]GOliUNIffENT.fDV4'TH1t PliOt'tz" CORPORATE BACKGROUND AND EXPERIENCE MAXIMUS is a New York Stock Exchange firrn with over $500 million in revenues in 2006 and over 5,000 employees. MAXIMUS, Inc. and David M. Griffith and Associates, Ltd. (DMG) were both founded in 1976 and, in May 1998, DMG merged with MAXIMUS to form the nation's largest consulting firm specializing in local and state government fmancial, operations improvement, systems, and health care applications. The Financial Services Division comprises 150 professionals serving over 1,000 goverrunents, universities, and other public sector and not-for-profit organizations each year. The division has operated continuously since 1976. The Financial Services Division comprises three regions (Central/East, South, and West), each led by a Regional Area Director and reporting to the President of the Division. The Western Region is headquartered in Sacramento, California, with additional offices in Irvine, Denver, and Seattle. The Western Region specializes in user fee analysis, cost allocation plans, SB 90 state mandated cost recovery, and operations improvement. There is no firm with greater experience in cost analysis and revenue enhancement than MAXIMUS in California or in any other state. In California, we have provided fiscal studies to over 200 cities, counties, and special districts. Since our first fee study in 1983, we have performed over 100 user fee studies for more than 70 clients. We seek to identify not only the full cost of each current user fee service, but also all potential fee services that the client might not currently be recovering. We bring innovation to our studies, an example of which is the creation of our NEXUS building and safety system. Finally, and perhaps most importantly, a hallmark of our approach is that our studies are implemented with minimum client frustration---{)ur goal is to make each study both educational and enjoyable by the client. Consultants of MAXIMUS have been called upon to examine virtually every facet oflocal goverrunent operations. Major public sector services offered by the firm include: · Cost of Service analysis (activity-based costing, fee for service, user fee) · Revenue enhancement (impact fee analysis, TOT audits, revenue maximization) . Cost allocation and indirect overhead rates · Operations improvement and performance measurement . State Controller's Report preparation (California) . State mandated cost recovery (California SB 90) Page 20 10-70 City of Chula Vista Planning and Building User Fee Studies *' MAXlMUS APPENDIX 1: PLANNING FEE SCHEDULE 10-71 City of Chula Vista USER FEE STUDY ACTUAL COST RESULTS Planning Division ~ ... . UNIT COSTS . R!;VENU!;IMPACTS Average Collected @ Calculated Annual Cily Calculated Per Unit Annual Annual Cost I Revenue Annual Calculated Unit Cost I Surplus I Revenue at Potential Surplus I fee # fee or Service Name I Descrintion Olv FCR Potential Fee (Subsidvl Current Fee Revenue (Deficill 1 Annexation 0 $ - $ 20,556 $ (20,556) $ - $ - $ - - 2 Appeals-w/Publlc Hearing 0 $ - $ 8,160 $ (8,160) $ - $ - $ - 5 Admin Conditional Use Permits 35 $ 1,510 $ 3,623 $ 12,113 $ 52,850 $ 126,805 $ (73 955) 6 Admin Variance 0 $ 1,473 $ 3,418 $ (1,945) $ - $ - $ - M - 7 Admin Modifications 0 $ 1,510 $ 2,825 $ (1,315 $ - $ - $ - 8 Admin Extensions 0 $ 195 $ 1,127 $ (932) $ - $ - $ - 9 Public Hearing Conditional Use Permits 0 $ 7,430 $ 10,502 $ (3,072) $ - $ - $ - 10 Public Hearing Variance 0 $ - $ 7,751 $ (7,751 $ - $ - $ - 11 Public Hearing Modifications 0 $ - $ 10,502 $ (10,502) _ $ - $ - $ - 12 Public Hearing Extensions 0 $ - $ 1,127 $ (1,127 $ - $ - $ - 14 Administrative Design Review 0 $ - $ 3,932 $ (3,932 $ - $ - $ - 15 Public Hearing Design Review 0 $ 14,945 $ 11,284 $ 3,661 $ - $ - $ - 16 Design Review Extension 0 $ - $ 1,127 $ (1,127) $ - $ - $ - 17 Coastal Dav Permit - Admin 0 $ - $ 3,589 $ (3,589) $ - $ - $ - 18 Coastal Dev Permit - Public Hearing 0 $ - $ 10,502 $ (10,502) $ - $ - $ - .-- 19 Coastal Dev Permit - De Minimus Waiver 0 $ - $ 2,413 $ (2,413) $ - $ - $ - 20 EIR applicalion/CEQA findinos 0 $ 10,970 $ 108 449 $ (97,4 79) $ - $ - $ - 22 Preliminary Environmental Reviewllnitial Studv 0 $ 7,648 $ 4,640 $ 3,008 $ - $ - $ - 23 Habitat Loss and lnciden!al Take (HUT) Permit 0 $ - $ 9,455 $ (9,455 $ - $ - $ - 24 Mitigation Monitoring 0 $ 4,000 $ 13,448 $ (9,448) $ - $ - $ - 26 Review of Consultant Qualifications 0 $ 50 $ 541 $ (491) $ - $ - $ - 27 General Plan Amendment 0 $ - $ 27,950 $ (27,950 $ - $ - $ - 28 General Development Plan and Modifications 0 $ - $ 61,409 $ (61,409 $ - $ - $ - 30 Precise Plan Approval/Modifications 0 $ - $ 74,701 $ (74,701 $ - $ - $ - 31 Sectional Planning Area Plan/Modiflcations 0 $ 9,025 $ 419.763 $ (410,738) $ - $ - $ - - __32 Proiect-Driven Specific Plan Amendment 0 $ - $ 15,369 $ (15,369 $ - $ - $ - - C) I -.j '" @ MAXIMUS, 2006 Page 1 of 3 City of Chula Vista USER FEE STUDY ACTUAL COST RESULTS Planning Oivision ~ UNIT CQ!iT!i ...... I.. ... R~VENUgiMPACj's Average Collected @ Calculated Annual City Calculated Per Unit Annual Annual Cost J Revenue Annual Calculated Unit Cost / Surplus I Revenue at Potential Surplus J Fee # Fee or Service Name I DescriDtion Qt. FCR Potential Fee l!iubsidvl Current Fee Revenue lDeflclt) 33 Tentative Map Fees (Up to 10 lots) 0 $ 8958 $ 12,886 $ (3,928) $ - $ - $ - - 34 Tentative MaD Fees (11 to 50 lots) 0 $ 8,958 $ 14,576 $ (5,618 $ - $ - $ - 35 Tentative Map Fees (>50 lots}-Base Fee 0 $ 16,178 $ 16,070 $ 108 $ - $ - $ - - 36 Tentative Map Fees (>50 lots}--Per Lot 0 $ 62 $ 198 $ 1136 $ - $ - $ - 37 Condo Conversion Fees (Up to 10 lots) 0 $ 8,958 $ 12,106 $ (3,148) $ - $ - $ - 38 Condo Conversion Fees (11 to 50 lots) 0 $ 8,958 $ 14,576 $ (5,618 $ - $ - $ - 39 Condo Conversion Fees (>50 lot5)-Base Fee 0 $ 16,178 $ 16,070 $ 108 $ - $ - $ - 40 Condo Conversion Fees (>50 lots)-Per Lot 0 $ 62 $ 198 $ (136 $ - $ - $ - 41 Signs-Si{:ln Program Application-Admin 0 $ 4,108 $ 3,555 $ 553 $ - $ - $ - 42 Signs-Sign Program Application-Public Hearing 0 $ 4,108 $ 7,082 $ (2,974) $ - $ - $ - 43 Signs-Sign Program 1 $ 35 $ 96 $ (61 $ 35 $ 96 $ (61) 44 SiQns-Non-Sion Proaram 1 $ 110 $ 96 $ 14 $ 110 $ 96 $ 14 -- -- 45 Rezoning-Aoolications 0 $ - $ 15,648 $ (15,648 $ - $ - $ - 46 Zoning Initial Business License Review 3596 $ 30 $ 48 $ (18 $ 107,880 $ 171,773 $ (63,893) Zoning-Initial Business License Review wlo Prior 47 Submittal 307 $ 45 $ 96 $ (51) $ 13,815 $ 29,329 $ 115,514 48 LQ. Familv Davcare Permits/Extensions 13 $ 185 $ 736 $ (551) $ 2,405 $ 9,569 $ (7,164) 49 Temp. Outside Sales 1 $ 85 $ 96 $ 111' $ 85 $ 96 $ (11) 50 Soecial Events on Private Prooertv 33 $ 110 $ 96 $ 14 $ 3,630 $ 3,153 $ 477 52 Official Zonina Letter 37 $ 85 $ 531 $ 1446' $ 3,145 $ 19,663 $ (16,518) 53 ProDertv Research >1/2 hr lEach HourI 0 $ 100 $ 96 $ 4 $ - $ - $ - 54 Application for Historic Desinn~tion 0 $ 515 $ 2,726 $ (2,211) $ - $ - $ - 55 Application for Mills Act status 4 $ 250 $ - 2,234 $ (1,984) $ 1,000 $ 8,934 $ (7,934) 56 Historic Sian Fee 0 $ 150 $ 364 $ 1214 $ - $ - $ - 57 Substantial Conformance Review-Minor 0 $ 5,521 $ 1,040 $ 4,481 $ - $ - $ - 58 Substantial Conformance Review-Major 0 $ 5,521 $ 1,825 - $ 3,696 $ - $ - $ - 59 Wireless Transmission Facilities-Admin 0 $ 3,647 $ 3,689 $ (42 $ - $ - $ - C> I ...... c..:> @ MAXIMU5, 2006 Page 2 of3 City of Chula Vista USER FEE STUDY ACTUAL COST RESULTS Planning Division UNIT COSTS / .... REVENuE IMPACTS .. Average Collected @ Calculated Annual City Calculated Per Unit Annual Annual Cost J Revenue Annual Calculated Unit Cost I Surplus I Revenue at Potential Surplus I fee # Fee or Service Name I Description Qh FeR Potential Fee ISubsldvl Current Fee Revenue (Deficit) 60 Wireless Transmission_ Facilities-Public Hearing 0 $ 3,647 $ 10,692 $ (7,045) $ - $ - $ - 61 Public Notice Mailing List 6 $ 50 $ - $ 50 $ 300 $ - $ 300 62 Pre-Application Review 1 $ - $ 138 $ (1381 $ - $ 138 $ (138) - 63 Deposit Billed Hours Balance (Annual) 1 $ 2,575,238 $ 3,427,293 $ 1852,055 $ 2,575,238 $ 3,427,293 $ (852,055) 64 Support to Building Permit Processing (Annual) 1 $ 397,674 $ 221,572 $ 176,102 $ 397,674 $ 221,572 $ 176,102 ~ C) I ..... """ Note: Current deposit-based revenues are consolidated in Fee #63 I $ 3.158.1671 $ 4,018,5161 $ (860,349)1 LEGEND' Fee# A reference number to facilitate discussion Fee or Service Name-' Descriotion The services andfor fees included in the MAXIMUS study Annual Quantitv The annual number of each service provided, as reported by the City Average Collected @ City Calculated FCR The current fee charaed bv the Citv for each service if applicable Calculated Unit Cost I Potential Fee The actual cost of each service, as calculated by MAXIMUS Per Unit Surplus ((Subsidy) The differenc~ bet~een the Actual Unit Cost and the Current Fee for each service Annual Revenue at Current Fee The potential revenue if the City charged the Current Fee for each service at the Annual Quantity for that service Calculated Annual Cost I Potential Revenue Current Fee x Annual Quantitv) . The potential revenue if the City charged the Actual Unit Cost for each service at the Annual Quantity for that service (Unit Cost x Annual Quantitv)" Annual Revenue Surplus J (Subsidy) The difference between the Total Annual CosUPotential Revenue and the Annual Revenue at Current Fee. This figure represents the annual subsidy (based on actual cost), the City provides to fee-payers/customers for each service, or the amount of overcharge. * Non-User Fee Activities These costs have been excluded from the estimated potential revenue totals. @ MAXIMUS, 2006 Page 3 of 3 City of Chula Vista Planning and Building User Fee Studies ~ /WAlml MAXlMUS APPENDIX 2: BUILDING FEE SCHEDULES NEW CONSTRUCTION FEE SCHEDULE NEW CONSTRUCTION REVENUES MP&E FEE SCHEDULE MISCELLANEOUS FEE SCHEDULE 10-75 City of Chula Vista Planning & Bui/ding Department-Bui/ding Division Consolidated Schedule of New Construction Fees. PLAN CHECK ONLY (All Construction Types) Construction Types: Construction Types: Construction Types: IFR,IIFR 11,111, V-1 HR 1I,IIl,IV,V-N Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each UBe Project Size Threshold Additional 100 Threshold Additional 100 Threshold Additional 1 00 Class UBe OccuDancv TVDe Threshold SIze 5.1. * Size s.f. . Size s.t. it A-1 Theater 2,000 $2,504 $32.87 $2,087 $27.39 $1,669 $21.91 - - 10,000 $5.134 $10.01 $4,278 $8.34 $3,422 $6.67 - - 20,000 $6,134 $5.33 $5,112 $4." $4,090 $3.55 - - 40,000 $7,200 $8.34 $6,000 $6.95 $4,800 $5.56 - 100,000 $12,204 $3.32 $10,170 $2.77 $8,136 $2.22 200,000 $15,528 $7.76 $12,940 $6.47 $10.352 $5.18 A-2 Church 2,000 $2,481 $32.56 $2,067 $27.13 $1,654 $21.71 10,000 $5,086 $9.94 $4,238 $8.28 $3,390 $6.62 - 20,000 $6,079 $5.27 $5,066 $4.39 $4,053 $3.51 - 40,000 $7,133 $8.27 $5,944 $6.89 $4,755 $5.51 - - 100,000 $12,096 $3.29 $10,080 $2.74 $8,064 $2.19 200,000 $15,384 $7.69 $12,820 $6.41 $10,256 $5.13 A~2.1 Auditorium 2,000 $2,435 $31.95 $2,029 $26.63 $1,623 $21.30 - - 10,000 $4,991 $9.73 $4.159 $8.11 $3,327 $6.49 - - 20,000 $5,964 $5.17 $4,970 $4.31 $3,976 $3.45 - 40,000 $6,998 $8.12 $5,832 $6.76 $4,666 $5.41 100,000 $11,868 $3.23 $9,890 $2.69 $7,912 $2.15 200,000 $15,096 $7.55 $12,580 $6.29 $10,064 $5.03 A-2.1 Restaurant 300 $1,797 $157.23 $1,497 $131.03 $1,198 $104.82 1,500 $3,684 $47.91 $3,070 $39.93 $2,456 $31.94 - 3,000 $4,402 $25.46 $3,669 $21.21 $2.935 $16.97 - 6,000 $5,166 $39.93 $4,305 $33.27 $3.'" $26.62 - - 15,000 $8,759 $15.89 $7,299 $13.24 $5,840 $10.59 30,000 $11,142 $37.14 $9,285 $30.95 $7,428 $24.76 A-3 Small Assembki Buildinns 300 $1,565 $136.94 $1,304 $114.11 $1,043 $91.29 - - 1,500 $3,206 $41.75 $2.67' $34.79 $2.139 $27.83 - - 3,000 $3,834 $22.16 $3,195 $18.46 $2,556 $14.77 - - 6,000 $4,499 $34.79 $3,749 $28.99 $2,999 $23.19 - 15,000 $7,630 $13.82 $6,358 $11.51 $5,087 $9.21 30,000 $9.702 $32.3' $6.065 $26.95 $6,468 $21.56 B Banks 500 $1,594 $83.69 $1,328 $69.74 $1,063 $55.79 - 2,500 $3,268 $25.50 $2,723 $21.25 $2,179 $17.00 - - 5,000 $3,905 $13.55 $3,254 $11.29 $2,604 $9.03 - - 10,000 $4,583 $21.25 $3,819 $17.71 $3,055 $14.17 - - 25,000 $7,770 $8.46 $6,475 $7.05 $5,180 $5.64 50,000 $9,885 $19.77 $8,238 $16.48 $6,590 $13.18 B Laundromat 200 $1,275 $167.37 $1,063 $139.48 $850 $111.58 - 1,000 $2,614 $51.00 $2,179 $42.50 $1,743 $34.00 2,000 $3,124 $27.09 $2,604 $22.58 $2,083 $18.06 - 4,000 $3,666 $42.50 $3,055 $35.42 $2,444 $28.33 10,000 $6,216 $16.89 $5,180 $14.08 $4,144 $11.26 20,000 $7,905 $39.53 $6,588 $32.94 $5,270 $26.35 B Medical Office 2,000 $2,295 $30.12 $1,913 $25.10 $1,530 $20.08 - - 10,000 $4,705 $9.18 $3,921 $7.65 $3,137 $6.12 - - 20,000 $5.623 $4.66 $4,686 $4.07 $3,749 $3.26 - - 40,000 $6,600 $7.66 $5,500 $6.38 $4,400 $5.11 - 100,000 $11,196 $3.04 $9,330 $2.53 $7,464 $2.02 200,000 $14,232 $7.12 $11,860 $5.93 $9,488 $4.74 MAXIMUS. Inc. Page 1 of 24 1/18/07 -1:19 PM 10-76 City of Chula Vista Planning & Bui/ding Department-Building Division Consolidated Schedule of New Construction Fees - PLAN CHECK ONLY (All Construction Types) Construction Types: Construction Types: Construction "TYpes: I FR. II FR 1I,III,V-1 HR 11,11I,IV,V-N Base Cost @ Cost far Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost@ Cost for Each UBe Project Size Threshold Additional 1 00 Threshold Additional 100 Threshold Additional 100 Class use OccUDanCY Tyee Threshold Size s.f. . SiZe s.f,* Size s.f. . B Offices 2,000 $2,272 $29.83 $1,894 $24.86 $1,515 $19.88 - - 10,000 $4,858 $9.10 $3,882 $7.58 $3,106 $6.06 - - 20,000 $5,588 $4.82 $4,640 $4.02 $3,712 $3.22 - - 40,000 $6.533 $7,57 $5,444 $8.31 $4,355 $5.05 - 100,000 $11,076 $3.01 $9,230 $2.51 $7,384 $2.01 200,000 $14,088 $7.04 $11,740 $5.87 $9,392 $4.70 B Hich Rise Office Buildino 15.000 $13,354 $23.37 $11,129 $19.48 $8,903 $15.58 - - 75,000 $27,378 $7.13 $22.815 $5.94 $18,252 $4.75 - - 150,QOO $32,724 $3.79 $27,270 $3.16 $21,816 $2.53 - 300,000 $38,412 $5,92 $32,010 $4.94 $25,608 $3.95 - 750,000 $65,070 $2.36 $54,225 $1.97 $43,380 $1.58 1,500,000 $82,800 $5.52 $69,000 $4.80 $55,200 $3.68 B High Rise condo Buildino 15,000 $13,354 $23.37 $11,129 $19.48 $8,903 $15.58 - - 75,000 $27,378 $7.13 $22,815 $5.94 $18,252 $4.75 - - 150,000 $32,724 $3.79 $27,270 $3.16 $21,816 $2.53 - 300,000 $38,412 $5.92 $32,010 $4.94 $25,608 $3.95 - - 750,000 $65,070 $2.36 $54,225 $1.97 $43,380 $1.58 1,500 000 $82,800 $5.52 $69,000 $4.60 $55,200 $3.68 E-1 PreschooUSchool 300 $1,681 $147.08 $1,401 $122.56 $1,121 $98.05 - - 1,500 $3,446 $44.84 $2,872 $37.36 $2,297 $29.89 - - 3,000 $4,118 $23.82 $3.432 $19.95 $2,748 $15.88 - - 6,000 $4,833 $37.35 $4,028 $31.13 $3,222 $24.90 - - 15,000 $8,195 $14.85 $6,829 $12.38 $5.463 $9.90 30,000 $10,422 $34.74 $8,685 $28.95 $6,948 $23.16 E-2 Preschool/School 300 $1,681 $147.08 $1,401 $122.56 $1,121 $98.05 - 1,500 $3,448 $44.84 $2,872 $37.36 $2,297 $29.89 - 3,000 $4,118 $23.82 $3,432 $19.85 $2,746 $15.88 - 6,000 $4,833 $37.35 $4,028 $31.13 $3,222 $24.90 - - 15,000 $8,195 $14.85 $6,829 $12.38 $5,463 $9.90 30,000 $10,422 $34.74 $8,685 $28.95 $6,948 $23.16 E-3 Davcare 300 $1,681 $147.08 $1,401 $122.56 $1,121 $98.05 - - 1,500 $3,448 $44.84 $2,872 $37.36 $2,297 $29.89 - - 3,000 $4,118 $23.82 $3.432 $19.85 $2,746 $15.88 - - 6,000 $4,833 $37.35 $4,028 $31.13 $3,222 $24.90 - - 15,000 $8,195 $14.85 $6,829 $12.38 $5,463 $9.90 30,000 $10,422 $34.74 $8,685 $28.95 $6,948 $23.16 F-1 Industrial/Manufacturing 1,000 $1,623 $42.60 $1,353 $35.50 $1,082 $28.40 - - 5,000 $3,327 $13.00 $2,773 $10.83 $2,218 $8.66 - 10,000 $3,9n $6.89 $3,314 $5.74 $2,851 $4.59 - 20,000 $4,666 $10.83 $3,888 $9.02 $3,110 $7.22 - 50,000 $7,914 $4.31 $8,595 $3.59 $5,278 $2.87 100,000 $10,068 $10.07 $8,390 $8.39 $6,712 $6.71 F-2 Heavy Industrial 2,000 $2,203 $28.91 $1,836 $24.09 $1,468 $19.27 - - 10,000 $4,516 $8.82 $3,763 $7.35 $3,010 $5.88 - - 20,000 $5,398 $4.87 $4,498 $3.89 $3,598 $3.11 - 40,000 $8,331 $7.35 $5,276 $6.12 $4,221 $4.90 - - 100,000 $10,740 $2.92 $8,950 $2.43 $7,160 $1.94 200,000 $13,656 $6.83 $11,380 $5.69 $9,104 $4.55 MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 2 of 24 1/18/07 -1:19 PM 10-77 City of Chula Vista Planning & Building Department-Building Division Consolidated Schedule of New Construction Fees. PLAN CHECK ONLY (All Construction Types) Construction Types: Construction Types: Construction Types: IFR,IIFR II, III, V-l HR II,III,IV,V.N Base Cost@ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each 8ase Cost @ Cost for Each UBC Project SiD Threshold Additional 100 Threshold Additional 1 00 Threshold Additional 100 Class UBe Occuoancy Tvoe Threshold Size s.f. .. Size s.f. .. Size s.f. .. H-1 High Explosion Hazard SOO $1,252 $65.74 $1,043 $54.78 $835 $43.83 - - 2,500 $2,567 $20.02 $2,139 $16.68 $1,711 $13.34 - 5,000 $3,067 $10.66 $2.556 $8.88 $2,045 $7.10 - - 10,000 $3,600 $16.70 $3,000 $13.92 $2,400 $11.13 - - 25,000 $6,105 $6.64 $5,088 $5.53 $4,070 $4.42 50,000 $7,764 $15.53 $6,470 $12.94 $5,176 $10.35 H-2 Moderate Explosion Hazard 1,000 $1,739 $45.64 $1,449 $38.04 $1,159 $30.43 - - 5,000 $3,565 $13.91 $2,971 $11.59 $2,376 $9.27 - 10,000 $4,260 $7.39 $3,550 $6.16 $2,840 $4.93 - 20,000 $4,999 $11.60 $4,166 $9.66 $3,333 $7.73 - 50,000 $8,478 $4.60 $7,065 $3.83 $5.652 $3.06 100,000 $10,n6 $10.78 $8,980 $8.98 $7,184 $7.18 H-3 High Fire Hazard 1,000 $1,739 $45.64 $1,449 $38.04 $1,159 $30.43 - 5,000 $3,565 $13.91 $2,971 $11.59 $2,376 $9.27 - 10,000 $4,260 $7.39 $3,550 $6.16 $2,840 $4.93 - 20,000 $4,999 $11.60 $4,166 $9.66 $3,333 $7.73 - - 50,000 $8,478 $4.60 $7,065 $3.83 $5,652 $3.06 100,000 $10776 $10.78 $8,980 $8.98 $7,184 $7.18 H-4 Repair GaraQe 300 $1,252 $109.55 $1,043 $91.29 $835 $73.03 - 1,500 $2,567 $33.40 $2,139 $27.83 $1,711 $22.26 - - 3,000 $3,068 $17.72 $2,556 $14.77 $2,045 $11.82 - - 6,000 $3,599 $27.83 $2,999 $23.19 $2,400 $18.55 - - 15,000 $6,104 $11.05 $5,087 $9.21 $4,069 $7.37 30,000 $7,762 $25.87 $6,468 $21.56 $5,174 $17.25 H-5 Aircraft Hanaer/ReoaJrs 1,000 $1,043 $27.39 $870 $22.83 $696 $18.26 - - 5,000 $2,139 $8.34 $1,783 $6.95 $1,426 $5.56 - - 10,000 $2,556 $4.44 $2,130 $3.70 $1,704 $2.96 - - 20,000 $3,000 $6.95 $2,500 $5.79 $2,000 $4.63 - - 50,000 $5,085 $2.76 $4,238 $2.30 $3,390 $1.84 100,000 $6,465 $6.47 $5,388 $5.39 $4,310 $4.31 H-6 Semiconductor Fabrication 1,000 $1,785 $46.87 $1,488 $39.06 $1,190 $31.24 - - 5,000 $3,660 $14.28 $3,050 $11.90 $2,440 $9.52 - - 10,000 $4,374 $7.60 $3,645 $6.33 $2,916 $5.06 - - 20,000 $5,134 $11.91 $4,278 $9.92 $3,422 $7.94 - - 50,000 $8,706 $4.72 $7,255 $3.93 $5,804 $3.14 100,000 $11,064 $11.06 $9,220 $9.22 $7,376 $7.38 H-7 Health Hazard Materials 500 $1,461 $76.68 $1,217 $63.90 $974 $51.12 - - 2,500 $2,994 $23.39 $2,495 $19.49 $1,996 $15.59 - - 5,000 $3,579 $12.42 $2,983 $10.35 $2,386 $8.28 - - 10,000 $4,200 $19.48 $3,500 $16.23 $2,800 $12.99 - 25,000 $7,122 $7.73 $5,935 $6.44 $4,748 $5.15 50,000 $9,054 $18.11 $7,545 $15.09 $6,036 $12.07 1-1.1 Nursery. Full-Time (5+) 200 $1,252 $164.33 $1,043 $136.94 $835 $109.55 - 1,000 $2,567 $50.08 $2,139 $41.73 $1,711 $33.38 - 2,000 $3,067 $26.60 $2,556 $22.17 $2,045 $17.74 - 4,000 $3,600 $41.73 $3,000 $34.77 $2,400 $27.82 - 10,000 $6,103 $16.58 $5,086 $13.82 $4,069 $11.06 20,000 $7,762 $38.81 $6,468 $32.34 $5,174 $25.57 MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 3 of 24 10-78 1/18/07 -1:19 PM City of Chula Vista Planning & Building Department-Building Division Consolidated Schedule of New Construction Fees - PLAN CHECK ONLY (All Construction Types) Construction Types: Construction Types: Construction Types: IFR. II FR 1I,III,V-1 HR II, 111, IV, V ~N Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each UBe Project Size Threshold Additional 100 Threshold Additional 100 Threshold Additional 1 00 Class use Occupancy 'TYpe Threshold SIz. s.f. .. Size s.f. . Size s.f. .. 1-1.2 Health Care Centers 500 $1,438 $75.47 $1,198 $62.89 1958 $50.31 . . 2.500 $2.947 $23.00 $2,456 119.17 $1,965 115.34 . . 5,000 $3,522 112.22 $2.935 $10.18 $2,348 $8.14 . . 10,000 $4.133 $19.17 13.444 $15.97 12.755 $12.78 . - 25,000 $7,008 $7.61 $5,840 $6.34 $4,672 15.07 50,000 $8,910 $17.82 $7,425 $14.85 $5,940 $11.88 J.2 NursinQ HomelAssisted Living 250 11,252 $131.46 $1,043 $109.55 $835 $87.64 . . 1.250 $2,567 $40.07 $2,139 $33.39 $1,711 126.71 - . 2,500 13,068 121.28 $2,556 $17.73 $2,045 114.18 . . 5.000 $3,599 $33.39 $3,000 $27.82 $2,400 $22.26 . . 12,500 $6,104 $13.28 $5,086 $11.07 $4,069 $8.86 25,000 $7,764 $31.06 $6,470 $25.88 $5,176 $20.70 J-3 Mental Hospital/Jail 2,500 $3,942 $41.39 $3,285 $34.49 $2.628 $27.59 . 12,500 $8,081 $12.61 $6,734 $10.51 $5,387 $8.41 . . 25,000 $9,657 $6.71 $8,048 $5.59 $6,438 $4.47 50,000 $11,334 $10.51 $9,445 $8.76 $7,556 $7.01 - - 125,000 $19,215 $4.1. $16,013 $3.49 $12,810 12.7. 250,000 $24,450 $9.78 $20 375 18,15 $16300 $6.52 M Stores (Retail) 2,500 $2,753 $28.91 $2,294 $24.09 $1.836 119.27 . . 12,500 $5,644 $8.82 $4,703 $7.35 $3,763 $5.88 . . 25,000 $6,746 $4.67 $5,622 $3.89 $4,498 $3.11 . 50,000 17.913 17.35 $6,594 $6,13 $5,275 $4.90 . - 125,000 $13,425 12,91 $11,188 $2.43 $8,950 $1.94 250,000 $17,063 $6.83 $14,219 $5.69 $11,375 $4.55 M Market 2,500 $2,753 $28.91 $2,294 $24.09 $1,836 $19.27 . 12,500 $5.644 $8.82 $4,703 $7.35 $3,763 15.88 . . 25,000 $6,746 $4.67 $5,622 $3.89 $4,498 $3.11 - . 50,000 $7,913 $7.35 $6,594 $6.13 $5,275 $4.90 . . 125,000 $13,425 $2.91 $11,188 $2.43 $8,950 $1.94 250,000 $17,063 $6.83 $14,219 $8.69 $11,375 $4.55 R-1 Apartment Bldg 800 $3,188 1104.60 $2,657 $87.17 12.125 169.73 . . 4,000 16.535 $31.89 $5,446 126.58 $4,357 $21,26 . . 8,000 $7,811 $16.94 $6,509 $14.11 15,207 $11.29 - . 16,000 $9,166 $26.56 $7,638 $22.13 $6,110 $17.71 . . 40,000 $15,540 $10.56 $12,950 $8.80 $10,360 17.04 80,000 $19,764 124.71 $16,470 $20.59 $13,176 $16.47 R.' Apartment Bldg. Repeat Unit 800 $102 13.35 185 $2.79 $88 $2.23 . . 4,000 $209 $1.01 $174 $0.84 $140 $0.67 - - 8,000 $250 $0.55 $208 $0.46 $166 $0.37 . . 16,000 $294 $0.86 1245 $0.71 $196 $0.57 . 40,000 $499 $0.34 $416 $0.28 $333 $0.22 80,000 1634 $0.79 $528 $0.66 1422 10.53 R-' Hotels & Motels 5,000 $2,759 $14.48 $2,300 $12.07 $1,840 $9.65 - . 25,000 $5,655 $4.43 $4,713 13.69 $3,770 $2.95 . . 50,000 $6,762 $2.34 $5.635 $1.95 $4,508 $1.56 . - 100,000 $7,932 $3.67 $6,610 $3.06 $5,288 $2.45 - . 250,000 $13,440 $1.46 $11,200 $1.22 18,960 10.98 500,000 $17,100 $3.42 $14,250 $2.85 $11,400 $2.28 MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 4 of 24 1/18i07 - 1:19 PM 10-79 City of Chula Vista Planning & Building Department-Building Division Consolidated Schedule of New Construction Fees - PLAN CHECK ONLY (All Construction Types) Construction Types: Construction Types: Construction Types: I FR,IlFR 11,111, V-1 HR II,III,IV,V-N Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost@ Cost for Each UBC Project Size Threshold Additional 1 00 Threshold Additional 100 Threshold Additional 1 00 Class use Occupancy Type Threshold Size s.f. .. Size s.f. .. Size s.f. .. R-1 Hotels & Motels - Phased Permits 5,000 $3,664 $19.23 $3,053 $16.02 $2,442 $12.82 25,000 $7,509 $5.87 $6,258 $4.89 $5,008 $3.91 50,000 $8,975 $3.12 $7,480 $2.60 $5,984 $2.08 - 100,000 $10,536 $4.88 $8.780 $4.06 $7,024 $3.25 - 250,000 $17,850 $1.96 $14,875 $1.63 $11,900 $1.30 500,000 $22,740 $4.55 $18,950 $3.79 $15,160 $3.03 R-3 Dwellings. Custom 1,500 $2,698 $28.42 $2.249 $23.68 $1,799 $18.95 - 2,500 $2,982 $42.59 $2,485 $35.49 $1,988 $28.40 - 3,500 $3,408 $23.68 $2,840 $19.73 $2,272 $15.79 - 5,000 $3,764 $9.47 $3,136 $7.89 $2,509 $6.31 - - 8,000 $4,048 $18.26 $3,373 $15.22 $2,698 $12.17 15,000 $5,326 $35.51 $4,438 $29.59 $3,551 $23.67 R-3 Dwellinos - Model 1,500 $3,053 $28.39 $2,544 $23.66 $2,036 $18.93 - 2,500 $3,337 $28.43 $2,781 $23.69 $2.225 $18.96 - 3,500 $3,621 $23.67 $3,018 $19.73 $2,414 $15.78 - 5,000 $3,9n $9.45 $3,314 $7.88 $2,651 $6.30 - - 8,000 $4,260 $17.25 $3,550 $14.38 $2,840 $11.50 15,000 $5,468 $36.45 $4,556 $30.38 $3,645 $24.30 R-3 Dwellinos - Production Phase 1,500 $250 $0.01 $208 $0.01 $167 $0.01 - of Master Plan 2,500 $250 -$0.02 $208 -$0.02 $167 -$0.01 - I (repeats) 3,500 $250 $0.94 $208 $0,78 $167 $0.63 - - 5,000 $264 $0.00 $220 $0.00 $176 $0.00 - - 8,000 $264 $0.21 $220 $0.18 $176 $0.14 15,000 $279 $1.86 $233 $1.55 $186 $124 R-3 Dwellings - Alternate Materials 1,500 $2,911 $56.80 $2,426 $47,33 $1,941 $37.87 - - 2,500 $3,479 $14.22 $2,899 $11.85 $2,320 $9.48 - - 3,500 $3,621 $23.67 $3,018 $19.73 $2,414 $15.78 - 5,000 $3,977 $42.61 $3,314 $35.51 $2,651 $28.41 - 8,000 $5,255 $4.07 $4,379 $3.39 $3,503 $2.71 15,000 $5,540 $36.93 $4,616 $30.78 $3,693 $24.62 R- 2.1, Group Care, Non~Amb. (6+) 2,000 $2,295 $30.12 $1,913 $25.10 $1,530 $20.08 2.3 &6.1 - 10,000 $4,705 $9.18 $3,921 $7.65 $3,137 $6.12 - 20,000 $5,623 $4.88 $4,686 $4.07 $3,749 $326 - 40,000 $6,600 $7.66 $5,500 $6.38 $4,400 $5.11 100,000 $11,196 $3.04 $9,330 $2.53 $7,464 $2.02 200,000 $14,232 $7.12 $11,860 $5.93 $9,488 $4.74 R~2.2 & Group Care, Ambulatorv (6+) 2,000 $2,295 $30,12 $1,913 $25.10 $1,530 $20.08 6.20 - 10,000 $4,705 $9.18 $3,921 $7.65 $3,137 $6.12 - 20,000 $5,623 $4.88 $4,686 $4.07 $3,749 $3.26 - 40,000 $6,600 $7.86 $5,500 $6.38 $4,400 $5.11 - 100,000 $11,196 $3.04 $9,330 $2.53 $7,464 $2.02 200,000 $14,232 $7.12 $11,860 $5.93 $9,488 $4.74 R-2.1.1, Group Care, Non-Amb. (1-5) 200 $1,101 $144.54 $918 $120.45 $734 $96.36 2.3.1 & - 1,000 $2,258 $44.06 $1,881 $36.71 $1,505 $29.37 6.1.1 2,000 $2,698 $23.40 $2,249 $19.50 $1,799 $15.60 - 4,000 $3,166 $36.71 $2,639 $30.59 $2,111 $24.47 - 10,000 $5,369 $14.60 $4,474 $12.16 $3,579 $9.73 20,000 $6,828 $34.14 $5,690 $28.45 $4,552 $22.76 MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 5 of 24 1/18/07 -1:19 PM 10-80 City of Chula Vista Planning & Bui/ding Department-Building Division Consolidated Schedule of New Construction Fees - PLAN CHECK ONLY (All Construction Types) Construction Types: Construction Types: Construction Types: I FR, II FR 1I,III,V.1 HR 1I,I11,IV. V. N Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each use Project Size Threshold AddiUonal10Q Threshold Additional 1 00 Threshold Additional 100 Class use OccuDancv TVDe Threshold Size s.f. " SiZe s.f. " SIze s.f. " R.2.2.1 & Group Care, Amb. (1.5) 200 $1,101 $144.54 $918 $120.45 $734 $96.36 6.2.1 - 1,000 $2,258 $44.06 $1,881 $36.71 $1,505 $29.37 - 2,000 $2,698 $23.40 $2.249 $19.50 $1,799 $15.60 - - 4,000 $3,166 $36.71 $2.639 $30,59 $2,111 $24.47 - - 10,000 $5,369 $14.60 $4,474 $12.16 $3,579 $9.73 20,000 $6,828 $34.14 $5,690 $28.45 $4,552 $22.76 5-1 Moderate Hazard Storace 1,000 $1,762 $46.26 $1,468 $38.55 $1,175 $30.84 - 5,000 $3,613 $14.10 $3,011 $11.75 $2,408 $9.40 - - 10,000 $4,318 $7.49 $3,598 $6,24 $2,878 $4.99 - - 20,000 $5,066 $11.75 $4,222 $9.79 $3,378 $7.83 - - 50,000 $8,592 $4.66 $7,160 $3.88 $5,728 $3.10 100,000 $10,920 $10.92 $9,100 $9.10 $7,280 $7.28 5-1 Self Storage 2,000 $1,739 $22.83 $1,449 $19.02 $1,159 $15.22 - 10,000 $3,565 $6.95 $2,971 $5.79 $2,3n $4.63 - - 20,000 $4,260 $3.71 $3,550 $3.09 $2,840 . $2.47 - - 40,000 $5,002 $5.78 $4,168 $4.82 $3,334 $3.86 - 100,000 $8,472 $2.30 $7,060 $1,92 $5,648 $1.54 200,000 $10,n6 $5.39 $8,980 $4.49 $7,184 $3,59 5-2 Low Hazard Storage 1,000 $1,530 $40.16 $1,275 $33.47 $1,020 $26.78 5,000 $3,137 $12.24 $2,614 $10.20 $2,091 $8.16 - 10,000 $3,749 $6.50 $3,124 $5.42 $2,499 $4.34 - - 20,000 $4,399 $10.20 $3,666 $8.50 $2,933 $6.80 - - 50,000 $7,458 $4.07 $6,215 $3.39 $4,972 $2.71 100,000 $9,492 $9.49 $7,910 $7.91 $6,328 $6.33 5-3 Reoair Garaoe 1,000 $1,530 $40,16 $1,275 $33.47 $1,020 $26.78 (not H-4) 5,000 $3,137 $12.24 $2,614 $10.20 $2,091 $8.16 10,000 $3,749 $6.50 $3,124 $5.42 $2,499 $4.34 - - 20,000 $4,399 $10.20 $3,666 $8.50 $2,933 $6.80 - 50,000 $7,458 $4.07 $6,215 $3.39 $4,972 $2.71 100,000 $9,492 $9.49 $7,910 $7.91 $6,328 $6.33 5-3 Fuel Dispensin(l Canopy 100 $985 $258.66 $821 $215,55 $657 $172.44 - 500 $2,020 $78.84 $1,683 $65.70 $1,347 $52.56 - 1,000 $2,414 $41.87 $2,012 $34.89 $1,610 $27.91 - - 2,000 $2,833 $65.70 $2,361 $54.75 $1,889 $43.80 5,000 $4,804 $26.12 $4,003 $21.75 $3,203 $17.41 10,000 $6,110 $61.10 $5,091 $50.91 $4,073 $40.73 5-3 Parking Garage 1,000 $1,669 $43.83 $1,391 $38.52 $1,113 $29.22 - 5,000 $3,422 $13.34- $2,852 $11.12 $2,282 $8.90 - 10,000 $4,090 $7.10 $3,408 $5.92 $2,726 $4.74 20,000 $4,800 $11.12 $4,000 $9.27 $3,200 $7.41 - 50,000 $8,136 $4.44 $6,780 $3.70 $5,424 $2,95 100,000 $10,356 $10.36 $8,630 $8.63 $6,904 $6.90 5-4 Open Parking Garage 1,000 $1,669 $43.83 $1,391 $36.52 $1,113 $29.22 - 5,000 $3,422 $13.34 $2,852 $11.12 $2,282 $8,90 - - 10,000 $4,090 $7,10 $3,408 $5.92 $2,726 $4.74 - - 20,000 $4,800 $11.12 $4,000 $9.27 $3,200 $7.41 - 50,000 $8,136 $4.44 $6,780 $3.70 $5,424 $2.96 100,000 $10,356 $10.36 $8,630 $8.53 $6,904 $6.90 MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 6 of 24 1/18/07 -1:19 PM 10-81 City of Chula Vista Planning & Building Department-Building Division Consolidated Schedule of New Construction Fees. PLAN CHECK ONLY (All Construction Types) Construction Types: Construction Types: Construction Types: I FR, II FR 11,IIl,V.1 HR II,III,IV,V-N Base Cost @ Cost far Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each use Project Size Threshold Additional 1 00 Threshold Additional 100 Threshold Additional 1 00 Class use Occupancy Tvne Threshold Size s.t. .. Size s.t. .. Size s.t. .. S-5 Aircraft HanQer & Helistops 500 $1,159 $60.86 $966 $50.71 $773 $40.57 - - 2,500 $2,376 $18.56 $1,980 $15.46 $1.584 $12.37 - - 5,000 $2,840 $9.86 $2,367 $8.21 $1,894 $6.57 - 10,000 $3,333 $15.46 $2,776 $12.88 $2,222 $10.30 - 25,000 $6,6S1 $6.14 $4,709 $5.11 $3,768 $4.09 50,000 $7,185 $14.37 $5,988 $11.98 $4,790 $9.58 U-1 Private Garages/Accessory Buildinns 100 $754 $197.81 $628 $164.84 $502 $131.87 - 500 $1,545 $60.28 $1,287 $50.24 $1,030 $40.19 - 1,000 $1,846 $32.01 $1,539 $26.68 $1,231 $21.34 - 2,000 $2,166 $50.24 $1,805 $41.87 $1,444 $33.49 - - 5,000 $3,674 $19.98 $3,061 $16.65 $2,449 $13.32 10,000 $4,673 $46.73 $3,894 $38.94 $3,115 $31.15 1-2 Convalescent Hospital 200 $1,565 $205.41 $1,304 $171.18 $1,043 $136.94 1,000 $3,208 $62.59 $2,674 $52.16 $2,139 $41.73 - 2,000 $3,834 $33.26 $3,195 $27.71 $2,556 $22.17 - 4,000 $4,499 $52.16 $3,750 $43.47 $3,000 $34.77 - - 10,000 $7,629 $20.73 $6,358 $17.28 $5,086 $13.82 20.000 $9,702 $48.51 $8,085 $40.43 $6,468 $32.34 A Restaurant TI 300 $1,449 $126.80 $1,208 $105.67 $966 $84.53 - - 1,500 $2,971 $38.66 $2,476 $32.21 $1,980 $25.77 - - 3,000 $3,551 $20.52 $2,959 $17.10 $2,367 $13.68 - 6,000 $4,166 $32.21 $3,472 $26.84 $2,777 $21.47 - 15,000 $7,066 $12.81 $5,888 $10.68 $4,710 $8.54 30,000 $8,987 $29.96 $7,489 $24.96 $5,991 $19.97 6 Office Tenant Improvement 300 $1,217 $106.52 $1,014 $88.77 $812 $71.01 1.500 $2,495 $32.45 $2,080 $27.04 $1,664 $21.63 3,000 $2,982 $17.24 $2,485 $14.36 $1,988 $11.49 - 6,000 $3,499 $27.05 $2,916 $22.54 $2,333 $18.03 - 15,000 $5,933 $10.76 $4,944 $8.96 $3,966 $7.17 30,000 $7,547 $25.16 $6,289 $20.96 $5.031 $16.77 B Medical Office Tenant Improvement 300 $1,333 $116.66 $1,111 $97.22 $889 $77.77 - 1,500 $2,733 $35.54 $2,278 $29.61 $1,822 $23.69 - 3,000 $3,266 $18.90 $2,722 $15.75 $2,177 $12.60 - - 6,000 $3.833 $29.64 $3,194 $24.70 $2,555 $19.76 15,000 $6,500 $11.78 $5,417 $9.81 $4,334 $7.85 30,000 $8,267 $27.56 $6,889 $22.96 $5,511 $18.37 E All ETI 300 $1,159 $101.44 $966 $84.53 $773 $67.63 - 1,500 $2,377 $30.92 $1,980 $25.77 $1,584 $20.62 - - 3,000 $2,840 $16.42 $2,367 $13.68 $1,894 $10.94 - 6,000 $3,333 $25.n $2,777 $21.47 $2,222 $17.18 15,000 $5,652 $10.25 $4,710 $8.54 $3,768 $6.83 30,000 $7.189 $23.96 $5,991 $19.97 $4,793 $15.98 I I Occupancy Tl 300 $1.252 $109.55 $1,043 $91.29 $835 $73.03 - - 1.500 $2,567 $33.40 $2,139 $27.83 $1,711 $22.26 3,000 $3.068 $17.72 $2,566 $14.77 $2,045 $11.82 6,000 $3,599 $27.83 $2,999 $23.19 $2,400 $18.55 15.000 $6.104 $11.05 $5.087 $9.21 $4,069 $7.37 30.000 $7.762 $25.87 $6,468 $21.56 $5,174 $17.25 H Hazardous Occupancy Tl 300 $1,565 $136.94 $1,304 $114.11 $1,043 $91.29 1.500 $3,208 $41.75 $2,674 $34.79 $2,139 $27.83 - 3,000 $3,834 $22.16 $3,195 $18.46 $2,556 $14.77 6,000 $4,499 $34.79 $3,749 $28.99 $2,999 $23.19 - 15,000 $7,630 $13.82 $6,358 $11.51 $5,087 $9.21 30,000 $9,702 $32.34 $8,085 $26.95 $6,468 $21.56 MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 7 of 24 1i18/07 -1:19 PM 10-82 City of Chula Vista Planning & Building Department-Building Division Consolidated Schedule of New Construction Fees. PLAN CHECK ONLY (All Construction Types) ConstrucUon Types: Construction Types: Construction Types: IFR,IIFR 1I,III,V.1 HR II,III,IV,V-N Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each UBC Project SIze Threshold AdditIonal 1 00 Threshold Additional 100 Threshold Additional 1 00 Class use Occupancy Type Threshold Size s.f. . Size s.f. * Size s.l. * M RetailTI 300 51,333 $116.66 $1,111 $97.22 $889 $77.n 1,500 $2,733 $35.54 $2,278 $29.61 $1,822 $23.69 3,000 $3,266 $16.90 $2,722 $16.76 $2.177 $12.60 - - 6,000 $3,833 $29.64 $3,194 $24.70 $2,555 $19.76 - - 15,000 $6,500 $11.78 $5,417 $9.81 $4,334 $7.85 30,000 $8,267 $27.56 $6,889 $22.96 $5,511 $18.37 - All Other TI (not listed above) 300 $1,333 $116.66 $1,111 $97.22 $889 $77.n - - 1,500 52,733 $35.54 $2.278 $29.61 $1,822 $23.69 - 3,000 $3,266 $18.90 $2,722 $15.75 $2,1n $12.60 - 6,000 $3,833 $29.64 $3,194 $24.70 $2,555 $19.76 - 15,000 $6,500 $11.78 $5,417 $9.81 $4,334 $7.85 30,000 $8,267 $27.56 $6,889 $22.96 $5,511 $18.37 SHELL BUILDINGS - All Shell Buildings 1,000 $1,797 $47.18 $1.497 $39.32 $1,198 $31.45 - - 5,000 $3,684 $14.37 $3,070 $11.98 $2,456 $9.58 - - 10,000 $4,403 $7.63 $3,669 $6.36 $2,935 $5.09 - 20,000 $5,166 $11.98 $4,305 $9.98 $3,444 $7.99 - SO,OOO $8,760 $4.77 $7,300 $3.96 $5,840 $3.18 100,000 $11,145 $11.15 $9,288 $9.29 $7,430 $7.43 Each additional 100 square feet, or portion thereof, up to the next highest project size threshold. MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 8 of 24 1/18/07 -1:19 PM 10-83 City of Chula Vista Planning & Building Department-Building Division Consolidated Schedule of New Construction Fees -INSP ONLY (All Construction Types) Construction Types: Construction Types: Construction Types: I FR,IIFR 1I,III,V41HR II, [II, IV, V-N Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each use Project Size Threshold Additional 100 Threshold AdditIonal 100 Threshold Additional 100 Class use Occupancy Tvne Threshold Size s.f. " Size s.r. " Size s.t. " A-1 Theater 2,000 $3,933 $37.59 $3,278 $31.33 $2.622 $25.06 - 10,000 $6,941 $42.50 $5,784 $35.42 $4,627 $28.34 - - 20,000 $11,191 $13.19 $9,326 $10.99 $7,461 $8.79 - 40,000 $13,829 $8.23 $11,524 $6.86 $9,219 $5.49 - - 100,000 $18,768 $5.14 $15,640 $4.28 $12,512 $3.42 200,000 $23,904 $11.95 $19,920 $9.96 $15,936 $7.97 A-2 Church 2,000 $3,812 $36.44 $3,177 $30.37 $2,541 $24.29 - - 10,000 $6,727 $41.18 $5,606 $34.32 $4,485 $27.46 - - 20,000 $10,846 $12.78 $9,038 $10.65 $7,230 $8.52 - 40,000 $13,402 $7.98 $11,168 $6.65 $8,934 $5.32 - - 100,000 $18,192 $4.97 $15,160 $4.14 $12,128 $3.31 200,000 $23,160 $11.58 $19,300 $9.65 $15,440 $7.72 A~2.1 Auditorium 2,000 $3,812 $36.44 $3,177 $30.37 $2,541 $24.29 - - 10,000 $6,727 $41.18 $5,606 $34.32 $4,485 $27.46 - - 20,000 $10,846 $12.78 $9,038 $10.65 $7,230 $8.52 - . 40,000 $13,402 $7.98 $11,168 $6.65 $8,934 $5.32 - 100,000 $18,192 $4.97 $15,160 $4.14 $12,128 $3.31 200,000 $23,160 $11.58 $19,300 $9.65 $15,440 $7.72 A-2.1 Restaurant 300 $1,882 $119.91 $1,568 $99.93 $1,255 $79.94 . 1,500 $3,321 $135.53 $2,767 $112.94 $2,214 $90.35 - 3,000 $5,354 $42.11 $4,461 $35.09 $3,569 $28.07 - . 6,000 $6,617 $26.23 $5,514 . $21.86 $4,411 $17.49 - - 15,000 $8,978 $16.41 $7,481 $13.68 $5,985 $10.94 30,000 $11,439 $38.13 $9,533 $31.78 $7,626 $25.42 A-3 Small Assemblv Buildinns 300 $1,832 $116.75 $1,527 $97.29 $1,221 $77.83 - 1,500 $3,233 $131.94 $2,694 $109.95 $2,155 $87.96 - 3,000 $5,212 $40.98 $4,343 $34.15 $3,475 $27.32 - 6,000 $6,441 $25.56 $5,368 $21.30 $4,294 $17.04 - 15,000 $8,741 $15.95 $7,284 $13.29 $5,828 $10.63 30,000 $11,133 $37.11 $9,278 $30.93 $7,422 $24.74 B Banks 500 $2,032 $77.67 $1,693 $64.73 $1,354 $51.78 - 2,500 $3,585 $87.81 $2,988 $73.18 $2,390 $58.54 - 5,000 $5,780 $27.26 $4,817 $22.71 $3,854 $18.17 - 10,000 $7,143 $17.01 $5,953 $14.17 $4,762 $11.34 25,000 $9,694 $10.61 $8,078 $8.84 $6,463 $7.07 50,000 $12,345 $24.69 $10,288 $20.58 $8,230 $16.46 B laundromat 200 $1,527 $146.00 $1,273 $121.66 $1,018 $97.33 . - 1,000 $2,695 $165.02 $2,246 $137.51 $1,797 $110.D1 - 2,000 $4,346 $51.26 $3,621 $42.71 $2,897 $34.17 - 4,000 $5,371 $31.94 $4,476 $26.62 $3,580 $21.29 - 10,000 $7,267 $19.98 $6,073 $16.65 $4,858 $13.32 20,000 $9,285 $46.43 $7,738 $38.69 $6,190 $30.95 B Medical Office 2,000 ' $3,816 $36.48 $3,180 $30.40 $2,544 $24.32 10,000 $6,734 $41.23 $5,612 $34.36 $4,490 $27.49 - 20,000 $10,858 $12.79 $9,048 $10.66 $7,238 $8.53 - 40,000 $13,416 $7.98 $11,160 $6.65 $8,944 $5.32 - 100,000 $18,204 $4.98 $15,170 $4.15 $12,136 $3.32 200,000 $23,164 $11.59 $19,320 $9.66 $15,456 $7.73 MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 9 of 24 1/18/07 -1:19 PM 10-84 City of Chula Vista Planning & Building Department-Building Division Consolidated Schedule of New Construction Fees -INSP ONLY (All Construction Types) Construction Types: Construction Types: Construction Types: J FR,I1FR 11,111. V-1 HR II.III,IV,V-N Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each UBe UBe OccuDancv TYoe Project Size Threshold Additional 100 Threshold Addftlonal100 Threshold Addftlonal100 Class Threshold Size s.f. .. Size s.f. * Size s.f.'" B Offices 2,000 $3,476 $33.23 $2,897 $27.69 $2,318 $22.15 - - 10,000 $6,134 $37.56 $5,112 $31.30 $4,090 $25.04 - - 20,000 $9,890 $11.68 $8,242 $9.73 $6,594 $7.78 - - 40,000 $12,226 $7.26 $10,188 $6.05 $8,150 $4.84 - - 100,000 $16,584 $4.54 $13,820 $3.78 $11,056 $3.02 200,000 $21,120 $10.56 $17,600 $8.80 $14,080 $7.04 B High Rise Office Building 15,000 $7,069 $9.01 $5,891 $7.51 $4,712 $6.01 - - 75,000 $12,474 $10.18 $10,395 $8.48 $8,316 $6.78 - - 150,000 $20,108 $3.16 $18,755 $2.63 $13,404 $2.10 - - 300.000 $24,840 $1.98 $20,700 $1.65 $18.580 $1.32 - 750,000 $33,750 $1.24 $28,125 $1.03 $22,500 $0.82 1,500,000 543,020 $2.87 $35,850 $2.39 $28,880 $1.91 B Hieh Rise cende Buildine 15,000 $7,666 $9.77 $6,389 $8.14 $5,111 $6.51 - 75,000 $13,527 $11.05 $11.273 $9.21 $9,018 $7.37 - - 150,000 $21,816 $3.43 $18.180 $2.86 $14,544 $2.29 - - 300,000 $26.964 $2.13 $22.470 $1.77 $17.976 $1.42 - - 750,000 $36,540 $1.34 $30,450 $1.12 $24,360 $0.90 1,500 000 $46.620 $3.11 $38,850 $2.59 $31,080 $2.07 E-1 Preschool/School 300 $1,882 $119.91 $1,568 $99.93 $1,255 $79.94 - - 1,500 $3,321 $135.53 $2,767 $112.94 $2,214 $90.35 - - 3.000 $5,354 $42.11 $4,461 $35.09 $3,569 $28.07 - - 6,000 $6,617 $26.23 $5,514 $21.86 $4,411 $17.49 - - 15.000 $8,978 $16.41 $7,481 $13.68 $5.985 $10.94 30,000 $11,439 $38.13 $9.533 $31.78 $7,628 $25.42 E-2 PreschooVSchool 300 $1,882 $119.91 $1.568 $99.93 $1,255 $79.94 - - 1.500 $3,321 $135.53 $2,787 $112.94 $2,214 $90.35 - - 3,000 $5,354 $42.11 $4,461 $35.09 . $3,569 $28.07 - - 6,000 $6,617 $26.23 $5,514 $21.86 $4.411 $17.49 - - 15,000 $8,978 $16.41 $7,481 $13.68 $5,985 $10.94 30,000 $11,439 $38.13 $9.533 $31.78 $7,626 $25.42 E-3 Daycare 300 $1,882 $119.91 $1,568 $99.93 $1,255 $79.94 - - 1.500 $3,321 $135.53 $2,767 $112.94 $2,214 $90.35 . - 3.000 $5,354 $42.11 $4,461 $35.09 $3,569 $28.07 - - 6,000 $6,617 $26.23 $5,514 $21.86 $4,411 $17.49 - - 15,000 $8,978 $16.41 $7,481 $13.68 $5.985 $10.94 30,000 $11,439 $38.13 $9,533 $31.78 $7,626 $25.42 F-1 Industrial/ManufacturinCl 1,000 $2.256 $43.14 $1,880 $35.95 $1,504 $28.76 - - 5.000 $3.982 $48.74 $3,318 $40.62 $2,654 $32.50 - - 10,000 $6,419 $15.16 $5,349 $12.63 $4.279 $10.10 - - 20,000 $7,934 $9.43 $6,612 $7.86 $5,290 $6.29 - 50,000 $10.764 $5.90 $8,970 $4.92 $7,176 $3.94 100,000 $13,716 $13.72 $11,430 $11.43 $9,144 $9.14 F-2 Heavy Industrial 2,000 $3,756 $35.91 $3.130 $29.93 $2,504 $23.94 - - 10.000 $6.629 $40.58 $5,524 $33.82 $4,419 $27.06 - - 20,000 $10,687 $12.61 $8,906 $10.51 $7,125 $8.41 - - 40,000 $13,210 $7.84 $11,008 $6.54 $8,806 $5.23 - 100,000 $17,916 $4.91 $14,930 $4.09 $11,944 $3.27 200,000 $22,824 $11.41 $19,020 $9.51 $15,216 $7.61 MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 10 of 24 10-85 1/18/07 -1:19 PM City of Chula Vista Planning & Building Department-Building Divis/on Consolidated Schedule of New Construction Fees - INSP ONLY (All Construction Types) Construction Types: Construction Types: Construction Types: I FR, II FR /I,III,V-1 HR II;III,IV,V.N Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost@ Cost for Each UBC Project Size Threshold Additional 1 00 Threshold Additional 100 Threshold Additional 100 Class UBC Occupancy Type Threshold S~e s.f. . Size s.t. . s~. s.t. . H-1 High Explosion Hazard 500 $2,364 $90.39 $1,970 $75.33 $1,576 $60.26 2,500 $4,172 $102.17 $3,477 $85.14 $2,781 $68.11 - - 5,000 $6,726 $31.73 $5,605 $26.44 $4,484 $21.15 10,000 $8,312 $19.78 S6,927 $16.49 $5,542 $t3.19 - 25,000 $11.280 $12.36 $9,400 $10.30 $7,520 $8.24 50,000 $14,370 $28.74 $11,975 $23.95 $9,580 $19.16 H-2 Moderate Explosion Hazard 1,000 $2,376 $45.42 $1,980 $37.85 $1,584 $30.28 5,000 $4,193 $51.34 $3,494 $42.78 $2,795 $34.22 - 10,000 $6,760 $15.95 $5.633 $13.29 $4,506 $10.63 - 20,000 $8,354 $9.93 $6,962 $8.28 $5,570 $6.62 - - 50,000 $11,334 $6.23 $9,445 $5.19 $7,556 $4.15 100,000 $14,448 $14.45 $12,040 $12.04 $9,632 $9.63 H-3 High Fire Hazard 1,000 $2,416 $46.19 $2,013 $38.50 $1,611 $30.60 - 5,000 $4,264 $52.20 $3,553 $43.50 $2,842 $34.80 - 10,000 $6,874 $16.22 $5,728 $13.52 $4,582 $10.82 - 20,000 $8,496 $10.10 $7,080 $8.42 $5,664 $6.73 - sa,ooo $11,526 $6.32 $9,605 $5.27 $7,684 $4.22 100,000 $14,688 $14.69 $12,240 $12.24 $9,792 $9.79 H-4 Repair Garage 300 $1,705 $108.66 $1,421 $90.55 $1,137 $72.44 - 1,500 $3,009 $122.80 $2,508 $102.33 $2,006 $81.86 - 3,000 $4,851 $38.15 $4,043 $31.79 $3,234 $25.43 - 6,000 $5,995 $23.78 $4 ,996 $19.82 $3,997 $15.86 - 15,000 $8,136 $14.86 $6,78Q $12.38 $5,424 $9.90 30,000 $10,364 $34.55 $8,637 $28.79 $6,910 $23.03 H-5 Aircraft Hanger/Repairs 1,000 $2,820 $53.92 $2,350 $44.93 $1,880 $35.95 - 5,000 $4,977 $60.93 $4,148 $50.78 $3,318 $40.62 - 10,000 $8,024 $18.95 $6,686 $15.79 $5,349 $12.63 - 20,000 $9,918 $11.79 $8,265 $9.83 $6,612 $7.86 - 50,000 $13,455 $7.38 $11,213 $6.15 $8,970 $4.92 100,000 $17,145 $17.15 $14,288 $14.29 $11,430 $11.43 H-6 Semiconductor Fabrication 1.000 $2,296 $43.89 $1,913 $36.58 $1,531 $29.26 - 5,000 $4,052 $49.62 $3,377 $41.35 $2,701 $33.08 - 10,000 $6,533 $15.41 $5,444 $12.84 $4,355 $10.27 20.000 $8,074 $9.61 $6,728 $6.01 $5,382 $6.41 - 50,000 $10,956 $6.00 $9,130 $5.00 $7,304 $4.00 100,000 $13,956 $13.96 $11,630 $11.63 $9,304 $9.30 H-7 Health Hazard Materials 500 $2,045 $7'.16 $1,704 $65.15 $1,363 $52.12 - 2,500 $3,608 $88.36 $3,007 $73.63 $2,405 $58.90 5,000 $5,817 $27.44 $4,848 $22.87 $3,878 $18.30 - 10,000 $7,189 $17.11 $5,991 $14.26 $4,793 $11.41 - 25,000 $9,756 $10.68 $8,130 $8.90 $6,504 $7.12 50,000 $12.426 $24.85 $10,355 $20.71 $8,284 $16.57 1-1.1 Nursery - Full.Time (5+) 200 $1,382 $132.07 $1,151 $110.06 $921 $88.04 1,000 $2,438 $149.28 $2,032 $124.40 $1,625 $99.52 - 2,000 $3,931 $46.38 $3,276 $38.65 $2,621 $30.92 - 4,000 $4,859 $28.88 $4,049 $24.07 $3,239 $19.26 - 10,000 $6,592 $18.06 $5,493 $15.05 $4,394 $12.04 20.000 $8,398 $41.99 $6,998 $34.99 $5.598 $27.99 MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 110124 10-86 1/18/07 -1:19 PM City of Chula Vista Planning & Building Department-Building Division Consolidated Schedule of New Construction Fees .INSP ONLY (All Construction Types) Construction Types: Construction Types: Construction Types: I FR,IIFR 1I,III,V-1 HR II. m, IV, V.N Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each use Project Size Threshold Additional 1 00 Threshold Additional 100 Threshold Additional 100 Class use OCCUDanCY TYee Threshold Sizl!I s.f. . Size s.f. . Size s.f. . 1-1.2 Heal1h Care Centers 500 $2.037 $77.87 $1,697 $64.90 $1,358 $51.92 - - 2,500 $3,594 $88.01 $2,995 $73.34 $2,396 $59.67 - - 5,000 $5,794 $27.35 $4,829 $22.79 $3,863 $18.23 - 10,000 $7,162 $17.04 $5,968 $14.20 $4,n4 $t1.36 - 25,000 $9,717 $10.64 58,098 S8.87 $6,478 $7.10 50,000 $12,378 $24.76 $10,315 $20.63 $8,252 $16.50 1-2 Nursing Home/Assisted LivinQ 250 $2,064 $157.87 $1,720 $131.56 $1,376 $105.25 - 1,250 $3,643 $178.44 $3,036 $148.70 $2,429 $118.96 2,500 $5,874 $55.43 $4,895 $46.19 $3,916 $36.95 - 5,000 $7,259 $34.55 $6,050 $28.79 $4,840 $23.03 - - 12,500 $9,851 $21.59 $8,209 $17.99 $6,567 $14.39 25,000 $12,549 $50.20 $10,458 $41.83 $8,366 $33.46 1-3 Menial Hospital/Jail 2,500 $4,277 S32.70 $3,564 $27.25 $2,851 $21.80 - 12,500 $7,547 $36.97 $6,289 $30.81 $5,031 $24.65 - - 25,000 $12,168 $11.47 $10,140 $9.56 $8,112 $7.65 - 50,000 $15,036 $7.15 $12,530 $5.96 $10,024 $4.77 - - 125,000 $20,400 $4.49 $17,000 $3.74 $13,600 $2.99 250,000 S26,010 $10.40 $21,675 S8.67 $17 340 $6.94 M Stores (Retail) 2,500 $4,815 $36.83 $4,012 $30.69 $3,210 $24.55 - - 12,500 $8,498 $41.61 $7,081 $34.68 $5,665 $27.74 - - 25,000 $13,699 $12.92 $11,416 $10.76 $9,133 $8.61 - 50,000 $16,928 $8.06 $14,106 $6.71 $11,285 $5.37 - - 125,000 $22,969 $5.03 $19,141 $4.19 $15,313 $3.35 250,000 $29,250 $11.70 $24,375 $9.75 $19,500 $7.80 M Market 2,500 $4,815 $36.83 $4,012 $30.69 $3,210 $24.55 - 12,500 $8,498 $41.61 $7,081 $34.68 $5,665 $27.74 - 25,000 $13,699 $12.92 $11,416 $10.76 $9,133 $8.61 - - 50,000 $16,928 $8.06 $14,106 $6.71 $11,285 $5.37 - 125,000 $22,969 $5.03 $19,141 $4.19 $15,313 $3.35 250,000 $29,250 $11.70 $24,375 $9.75 $19,500 $7.80 R-1 Apartment Bldo 800 $3,269 $78.13 $2,725 $65.11 $2,180 $52.09 - - 4,000 $5,770 $88.32 $4,808 $73.60 $3,846 $58.88 - - 8,000 $9,302 $27.42 $7,752 $22.85 $6,202 $18.28 - - 16,000 $11,496 $17.10 $9,580 $14.25 $7,664 $11.40 - - 40,000 $15,600 $10.68 $13,000 $8.90 $10,400 $7.12 80,000 $19,872 $24.84 $16,560 $20.70 $13248 $16.56 R-1 Apartment Bldg ~ Repeat Unit 800 $2,225 $53,17 $1,854 $44.31 $1,483 $35.45 - - 4,000 $3,926 $60.10 $3,272 $50,06 $2,616 $40.06 - - 6,000 $6,330 $18.67 $5,275 $15.56 $4,220 $12.45 - - 16,000 $7,824 $11.64 $6,520 $9.70 $5,216 $7.76 - - 40,OOG $10,618 $7.27 $8,848 $6.06 $7,078 $4.85 80,000 $13,526 $16.91 $11,272 $14.09 S9,018 $11.27 R-1 Ho1els & Motels 5,000 $4,952 $18.94 $4,127 $15.78 $3,301 $12.62 - 25,000 $8,739 $21.40 $7,283 $17.83 $5,826 $14.26 - - 50,000 $14,088 $6.65 $11,740 $5.54 $9,392 $4.43 - - 100,000 $17,412 $4.15 $14,510 $3.46 $11,608 $2.77 - 250,000 $23,640 $2.59 $19,700 $2.16 $15,760 $1.73 500,000 $30,120 $6.02 $25,100 $5.02 $20,080 $4.02 MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 12 of 24 1/18/07 -1:19 PM 10-87 City of Chul. Vist. Planning & Building Department-Building Division Consolidated Schedule of New Construction Fees .INSP ONLY (All Construction Types) Construction Types: Construction Types: Construction Types: I FR, II FR 1I,IIl,V-1HR II,III,IV,V-N Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each use Project Size Threshold Additional 1 00 Threshold Additional 1 00 Threshold Addltlonal100 Class use Occupancy Tvee Threshold Size sJ. * Size s.f. . Size s.f. . R-l Hotels & Motels ~ Phased Permits 5,000 $4,952 $18.94 $4,127 $15.78 $3,301 $12.62 . . 25,000 $8,739 $21.40 $7,283 $17.83 $5,826 $14.26 . 50,000 $14,088 $6.65 $11,740 $5.54 $9,392 $4.43 . 100,000 $17.412 $4.15 $14,510 $3.46 $11,608 $2.77 - 250,000 $23,640 $2.59 $19,700 $2.16 $15,760 $1.73 500,000 $30,120 $6.02 $25,100 $5.02 $20,080 $4.02 R-3 Dwellings - Custom 1,500 $2,982 $14.18 $2,485 $11.81 $1,9B8 $9.45 - 2,500 $3,124 $99.45 $2,603 $82.88 $2,083 $66.30 . - 3,500 $4,119 $61.53 $3,432 $51.27 $2,746 $41.02 - 5,000 $5,042 $49.71 $4,201 $41.43 $3,361 $33.14 - 8,000 $6,533 $32.45 $5,444 $27.04 $4,355 $21.63 15,000 $8,804 $58.70 $7,337 $48.91 $5,870 $39.13 R-3 Dwellings ~ Model 1,500 $3,266 $42.59 $2,722 $35.49 $2,178 $28.40 - . 2,500 $3,692 $56.81 $3,on $47.34 $2,462 $37.88 - 3,500 $4,260 $61.53 $3,550 $51.27 $2,840 $41.02 - 5,000 $5,183 $40.23 $4,319 $33.52 $3,456 $26.82 8,000 $6,390 $28.41 $5,325 $23.68 $4,260 $18.94 15,000 $8,379 $55.86 $6,983 $46.55 $5,586 $37.24 R-3 Dwellings ~ Production Phase 1,500 $2,n6 $36.21 $2,314 $30.18 $1,851 $24.14 of Master Plan 2,500 $3,138 $48.31 $2,615 $40.26 $2,092 $32.21 (repeats) 3,500 $3,621 $52.32 $3,018 $43.60 $2,414 $34.88 5,000 $4,406 $34.21 $3,672 $28.50 $2,938 $22.80 . 8,000 $5,432 $24.13 $4,527 $20.11 $3,622 $16.08 15,000 $7.121 $47.48 $5,934 $39.56 $4,748 $31.65 R-3 Dwellinos ~ Alternate Materials 1,500 $3,593 $46.86 $2,994 $39.05 $2,395 $31.24 - 2,500 $4,062 $62.51 $3,385 $52.09 $2,708 $41.67 . 3,500 $4,687 $67.65 $3,906 $56.38 $3,124 $45.10 . 5,000 $5,702 $44.27 $4,751 $36.89 $3,801 $29.51 - 8,000 $7,030 $31.23 $5,858 $26.03 $4,686 $20.82 15,000 $9,216 $61.44 $7,680 $51.20 $6,144 $40.96 R - 2.1, Group Care, Non-Amb. (6-+) 2,000 $3,674 $35.12 $3,061 $29.27 $2,449 $23.42 2.3 & 6.1 - 10,000 $6,484 $39.68 $5,403 $33.07 $4,322 $26.46 - 20,000 $10,452 $12.32 $8,710 $10.27 $6,968 $8.22 - 40,000 $12,917 $7.69 $10,764 $6.41 $8,611 $5.13 . 100,000 $17,532 $4.79 $14,610 $3.99 $11,688 $3.19 200,000 $22,320 $11.16 $18,600 $9.30 $14880 $7.44 R~2.2 & Group Care, Ambulatory (6+\ 2,000 $3,674 $35.12 $3,061 $29.27 $2,449 $23.42 6.20 10,000 $6,484 $39.68 $5,403 $33.07 $4,322 $26.46 . 20,000 $10,452 $12.32 $8,710 $10.27 $6,968 $8.22 . - 40,000 $12,917 $7.69 $10,764 $6.41 $8,611 $5.13 . 100,000 $17,532 $4.79 $14,610 $3.99 $11,688 $3.19 200,000 $22,320 $11.16 $18,600 $9.30 $14,880 $7.44 R~2.1.1, Group Care, Non~Amb. (1-5) 200 $1,797 $171.76 $1,497 $143.13 $1,198 $114.51 2.3.1 & 1,000 $3,171 $194.16 $2,643 $161.80 $2,114 $129.44 6.1.1 - 2,000 $5,113 $60.30 $4,261 $50.25 $3,408 $40.20 - 4,000 $6,319 $37.59 $5,266 $31.33 $4,212 $25.06 . 10,000 $8,574 $23.49 $7,145 $19.58 $5,716 $15.66 20,000 $10,923 $54.62 $9,103 $45.51 $7,282 $36.41 MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 13 of 24 1/18/07 -1:19 PM 10-88 City of Chula Vista Planning & Building Department-Building Division Consolidated Schedule of New Construction Fees. INSP ONLY (All Construction Types) Construction Types: ConstnJction Types: Construction Types: IFR,IIFR II,III,V.' HR II, III, IV, V~N Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each USC Project Size Threshold Additional 100 Threshold Additional 100 Threshold Additional 1 00 Class use OccutlanCV Tvne Threshold Size sJ. * Sfze s.f. * Size 5.f. . R-2.2.1 & Group Care, Amb. (1-5) 200 $1,797 $171.76 $1,497 $143.13 $1.198 $114.51 6.2.1 1,000 $3,171 $194.16 $2,643 $161.80 $2,114 $129.44 - 2,000 $5,113 $60.30 $4,261 $50.25 $3,408 $40.20 - 4,000 $6,319 $37.59 $5.266 $31.33 $4.212 $25.06 - - 10,000 $8,574 $23.49 $7,145 $19.58 $5,716 $15.66 20,000 $10,923 $54.62 $9,103 $45.51 $7,282 $36.41 5-1 Moderate Hazard StoraQe 1,000 $2,420 $46.26 $2.017 $38.55 $1,613 $30.84 - - 5,000 $4,27Q $52.28 $3,559 $43.57 $2,847 $34.86 - - 10,000 $6,884 $16.24 $5,737 $13.53 $4.590 $10.82 - - 20,000 $8,508 $10.12 $7,090 $8.43 $5,672 $6.75 - 50,000 $11,544 $6.34 $9,620 $5.28 $7,696 $4.22 100,000 $14,712 $14.71 $12,260 $12.26 $9,808 $9.81 5-1 Self Storage 2,000 $3,115 $29.77 $2,596 $24.81 $2,076 $19.84 - - 10,000 $5,496 $33.65 $4,580 $28.04 $3,664 $22.43 - 20,000 $8,861 $10.46 $7,384 $8,72 $5,907 $6.98 - - 40,000 $10,954 $6.50 $9,128 $5.42 $7,302 $4.34 - - 100,000 $14.856 $4.08 $12.380 $3.40 $9,904 $2.72 200,000 $18936 $9.47 $15,780 $7.89 $12,624 $6.31 5-2 Low Hazard Storaoe 1,000 $2,532 $48.40 $2,110 $40.33 $1,688 $32.27 - - 5,000 $4,468 $54.70 $3,723 $45.58 $2.978 $36.46 - - 10,000 $7,202 $16.99 $6,002 $14.16 $4,802 $11.33 - 20,000 $8,902 $10.59 $7,418 $8.82 $5,934 $7.06 - 50,000 $12,078 $6.61 $10,065 $5.51 $8,052 $4.41 100,000 $15,384 $15.38 $12,820 $12.82 $10,256 $10.26 5-3 Reoair Garaoe 1,000 $2,532 $48.40 $2,110 $40.33 $1,688 $32.27 - I (ooIH-4) 5,000 $4,468 $54.70 $3,723 $45.58 $2,978 $36.46 - - 10,000 $7,202 $16.99 $6,002 $14.16 $4,802 $11.33 - 20,000 $8,902 $10.59 $7,418 $8.82 $5,934 $7.06 - - SO,OOO $12,078 $6.61 $10,065 $5.51 $8,052 $4.41 100,000 $15,384 $15.38 $12,820 $12.82 $10,256 $10.26 5-3 Fuel Dispensing Canopv 100 $499 $95.43 $416 $79.53 $333 $63.62 - - 500 $881 $107.87 $734 $89.89 $587 $71.91 - 1,000 $1,420 $33.51 $1.184 $27.93 $947 $22.34 - - 2,000 $1.755 $20.87 $1,463 $17.39 $1,170 $13.91 - - 5,000 $2,381 $13.07 $1,984 $10.89 $1,588 $8.71 10,000 $3,035 $30.35 $2 529 $25.29 $2,023 $20.23 5-3 Parking Garage 1,000 $3,606 $68.93 $3.005 $57.44 $2,404 $45.95 - 5,000 $6,363 $77.92 $5.303 $64.93 $4,242 $51.94 - - 10,000 $10,259 $24.20 $8,549 $20.17 $6,839 $16.14 - 20,000 $12,679 $15.08 $10,566 $12.56 $8,453 $10.05 - 50,000 $17,202 $9.42 $14,335 $7.85 $11,468 $6.28 100,000 $21912 $21.91 $18,260 $18.26 $14,608 $14.61 5-4 Open Parkino Garage 1,000 $3,462 $66.19 $2,885 $55.16 $2,308 $44.13 - - 5,000 $6,110 $74.80 $5,092 $62.33 $4,073 $49.86 - - 10,000 $9,850 $23.23 $8,208 $19.36 $6,566 $15.49 - - 20,000 $12,173 $14.48 $10,144 $12.07 $8,115 $9.66 - - 50,000 $16,518 $9.06 $13,765 $7.55 $11,012 $6.04 100,000 $21,048 $21.05 $17,540 $17.54 $14,032 $14.03 MAXIMUS. Inc. Page 14 of 24 1/18/07 -1:19 PM 10-89 City of Chula Vista Planning & Building Department-Building Division Consolidated Schedule of New Construction Fees. INS? ONLY (All Construction Types) Construction Types: Construction Types: Construction Types: IFR,IIFR 1I,III,V-1 HR 1I,1II.1V,V-N Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each UeC Project Size Threshold Additional 1 00 Threshold Additional 100 Threshold Additional 1 00 Class use Occupancy Type Threshold Size s.f. ,.. Size sJ. * Sizo 8.1.. 8-5 Aircraft Hanger & Helistops 500 $2,680 $102.49 $2,234 $85.41 $1,787 $68.33 - - 2,500 $4,730 $115.83 $3,942 $96.52 $3,154 $77.22 - - 5,000 $7,626 $36.00 $6,355 $30.00 $5,084 $24.00 - - 10,000 $9,426 $22.41 $7,855 $18.68 $6,284 $14.94 - - 25,000 $12,788 $14.01 $10,656 $11.68 $8,525 $9.34 50,000 $16,290 $32.58 $13,575 $27.15 $10,860 $21.72 U-1 Private Garages/Accessory Buildings 100 $599 $114.52 $499 $95.43 $399 $76.35 - (a[so need to add a repeat cateoory) 500 $1,057 $129.42 $881 $107.85 $705 $86.28 1,000 $1,704 $40.22 $1.420 $33.51 $1,136 $26.81 2,000 $2,106 $25.04 $1,755 $20.87 $1,404 $16.69 5,000 $2,858 $15.66 $2,381 $13.05 $1,905 $10.44 10,000 $3,641 $36.41 $3,034 $30.34 $2,427 $24.27 1-2 Convalescent Hospital 200 $1,682 $160.80 $1,402 $134.00 $1,121 $107.20 1,000 $2,969 $181.74 $2.474 $151.45 $1,979 $121.16 - - 2,000 $4,786 $56.45 $3,988 $47.04 $3,191 $37.63 - 4,000 $5,915 $35.20 $4,929 $29.33 $3,943 $23.46 - 10,000 $8,027 $21.98 $6,689 $18.31 $5,351 $14.65 20,000 $10,224 $51.12 $8,520 $42.60 $6,816 $34.08 A Restaurant Tl 300 $1,223 $77.92 $1,019 $64.93 $815 $51.95 - 1,500 $2,158 $88.10 $1,798 $73.41 $1,439 $58.73 - 3,000 $3,479 $27.36 $2,900 $22.80 $2,320 $18.24 - 6,000 $4,300 $17.05 $3,584 $14.20 $2,867 $11.36 15,000 $5,834 $10.67 $4,862 $8.89 $3,890 $7.11 30,000 $7,434 $24.78 $6,195 $20.65 $4,956 $16.52 B Office Tenant Improvement 300 $1,098 $69.98 $915 $58.32 $732 $46.66 - 1,500 $1,938 $79.10 $1,615 $65.91 $1,292 $52.73 - 3,000 $3,124 $24.56 $2,604 $20.46 $2,083 $16.37 - 6,000 $3,861 $15.33 $3,218 $12.77 $2,574 $10.22 - 15,000 $5,240 $9.55 $4,367 $7.96 $3,494 $6.37 30,000 $6,674 $22.25 $5,561 $18.54 $4.449 $14.83 B Medical Office Tenant Improvement 300 $1,123 $71.56 $936 $59.63 $749 $47.71 - - 1,500 $1,982 $80.91 $1,652 $67.43 $1,321 $53.94 - 3,000 $3,195 $25.13 $2,663 $20.94 $2,130 $16.75 - 6,QOO $3,949 $15.67 $3,291 $13.06 $2,633 $10.45 - 15,000 $5,360 $9.78 $4,466 $8.15 $3,573 $6.52 30,000 $6,827 $22.76 $5,689 $18.96 $4,551 $15.17 E All ETI 300 $839 $53.43 $699 $44.53 $559 $35.62 1,500 $1.480 $60.40 $1,233 $50.33 $987 $40.26 3,000 $2,386 $18.76 $1,988 $15.63 $1,590 $12.50 - 6,000 $2,948 $11.70 $2,457 $9.75 $1,966 $7.80 - 15,000 $4,001 $7.31 $3,335 $6.09 $2,668 $4.87 30,000 $5,098 $16.99 $4,248 $14.16 $3,398 $11.33 1 I Occupancy Tl 300 $839 $53.43 $699 $44.53 $559 $35.62 - 1,500 $1.480 $60.40 $1,233 $50.33 $987 $40.26 - 3,000 $2,386 $18.76 $1,988 $15.63 $1,590 $12.50 - 6,000 $2,948 $11.70 $2.457 $9.75 $1,966 $7.80 - - 15,000 $4,001 $7.31 $3,335 $6.09 $2,668 $4.67 30,000 $5,098 $16.99 $4,248 $14.16 $3,398 $11.33 H Hazardous Occupancy TI 300 $1,123 $71.56 $936 $59.63 $749 $47.71 - - 1,500 $1,982 $80.91 $1,652 $67.43 $1,321 $53.94 - - 3,000 $3,195 $25.13 $2,663 $20.94 $2,130 $16.75 - - 6,000 $3,949 $15.67 $3,291 $13.06 $2,633 $10.45 - 15,000 $5,360 $9.78 $4,466 $8.15 $3,573 $6.52 30,000 $6,827 $22.76 $5,689 $18.96 $4,551 $15.17 MAXIM US, Inc. Page 15 of 24 1/18/07 -1:19 PM 10-90 City of Chula Vista Planning & Building Department-Building Division Consolidated Schedule of New Construction Fees. INSP ONLY (All Construction Types) Construction Types: Construction Types: Construction Types: I FR,I1 FR 1I,III,V-1 HR II, m,/V, V.N Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each UBC Project Size Threshold Additional 100 Threshold Additional 1 00 Threshold Additional 100 Class UBe Occupancy TYpe Threshold Size s.t.* Size s.f. . SIze s.f. . M RetailTI 300 $1,073 $68.39 $894 $58.99 $715 $45.59 . 1,500 $1,894 $77.30 $1,576 $64.41 $1,283 $51.53 . . 3,000 $3,063 $24.02 $2,544 $20.01 $2,036 $16.01 . 6,000 $3,774 $14.97 $3,145 $12.48 $2,516 $9.98 . . 15,000 $5,121 $9.36 $4,268 $7.80 $3,414 $6.24 30,000 $6,525 $21.75 $5,438 $18.13 $4,350 $14.50 . All OtherTI {not listed above 300 $1,323 $84.29 $1,102 $70.24 $882 $56.19 . . 1,500 $2,334 $95.28 $1,945 $79.40 $1,556 $63.52 . . 3,000 $3,763 $29.60 $3,136 $24.66 $2,509 $19.73 . 6,000 $4,651 $18.45 $3,876 $15.37 $3,101 $12.30 . . 15,000 $6,311 $11.54 $5,259 $9.61 $4,208 $7.69 30000 58,042 $26.81 $6,701 $22.34 $5,361 $17.87 SHEU BUILDINGS . All Shell Buildin s 1,000 $2,670 $51.05 $2,225 $42,54 $1,780 $34.03 . . 5,000 $4,712 $57.71 $3,927 $48.09 $3,142 $38.47 . . 10,000 $7,598 $17.93 $6,331 $14.94 $5,065 $11.95 . . 20,000 $9,390 $11.18 $7,825 $9.31 $6,260 $7.45 . . 50,000 $12,743 $6.98 $10,619 $5.81 $8,495 $4.65 100,000 $16,230 $16.23 $13,525 $13.53 510,820 $10.82 Each additional 100 square feet, or portion thereof, up to the next highest project size threshold. MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 16 of24 1/18/07 -1:19 PM 10-91 City of Chula Vista Planning & Building Department-Building Division Consolidated Schedule of New Construction Fees - PC & INSP COMBINED (All Construction Types) Construction Types: Construction Types: Construction Types: IFR,IIFR II, III, V-1 HR II, III,IV. V-N Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each UBC Project Size Threshold Additional 1 00 Threshold Additional 100 Threshold AddJtional1DO Class use Occupancy Type Threshold Size s.f. . Size s.t. * Size sJ. . A-1 Theater 2,000 $6,437 $70.46 $5,364 $58.72 $4,292 $46.98 - - 10,000 $12,074 $52.51 $10,062 $43.76 $8,050 $35.01 - - 20,000 $17,326 $18.52 $14,438 $15.43 $11,550 $12.34 - 40,000 $21,029 $16.57 $17,524 $13.81 $14,019 $11.05 - - 100,000 $30,972 $8.46 $25,810 $7.05 $20,648 $5.64 200,000 $39,432 $19.72 $32,860 $16.43 $26,288 $13.14 A-2 Church 2,000 $6,293 $69.00 $5,244 $57.50 $4,195 $46.00 - - 10,000 $11,813 $51.10 $9,844 $42.58 $7,875 $34.06 - - 20,000 $16,922 $18.06 $14,102 $15.05 $11,282 $12.04 - - 40,000 $20,534 $16.24 $17,112 $13.53 $13,690 $10.82 - - 100,000 $30,276 $8.27 $25,230 $6.89 $20,184 $5.51 200,000 $38,544 $19.27 $32,120 $16.06 $25,696 $12.85 A~2.1 Auditorium 2,000 $6,248 $68.39 $5,205 $57.00 $4,164 $45.60 - 10,000 $11,718 $50.92 $9,765 $42.43 $7,812 $33.94 - - 20,000 $16,810 $17.96 $14,008 $14.98 $11,206 $11.98 - - 40,000 $20,405 $16.09 $17,004 $13.41 $13,603 $10.73 - - 100,000 $30,060 $8.20 $25,050 $6.83 $20,040 $5.46 - - 200,000 $38,256 $19.13 $31,880 $15.94 $25,504 $12.75 A-2.1 Restaurant 300 $3,679 $277.15 $3,066 $230.96 $2,452 $184.77 - - 1,500 $7,004 $183.47 $5,837 $152.89 $4,670 $122.31 - - 3,000 $9,756 $67.55 $8,130 $56.29 $6,504 $45.03 - - 6,000 $11,783 $66.18 $9,819 $55.15 $7,855 $44.12 - - 15,000 $17,739 $32.28 $14,783 $26.90 $11,826 $21.52 - - 30,000 $22,581 $75.27 $18,818 $62.73 $15,054 $50.18 A-3 Small Assembly BuildinQs 300 $3,397 $253.68 $2,831 $211.40 $2,265 $169.12 - - 1,500 $6,441 $173.69 $5,368 $144.74 $4,294 $115.79 - - 3,000 $9,046 $63.17 $7,539 $52.64 $6,031 $42.11 - - 6,000 $10,941 $60.31 $9,118 $50.25 $7,294 $40.20 - 15,000 $16,369 $29.81 $13,641 $24.84 $10,913 $19.87 30,000 $20,840 $69.47 $17,366 $57.89 $13,893 $46.31 B Banks SOO $3,626 $161.36 $3,021 $134.47 $2,417 $107.57 - - 2,500 $6,853 $113.31 $5,711 $94.43 $4,569 $75.54 5,000 $9,686 $40.83 $8,071 $34.03 $6,457 $27.22 - 10,000 $11,727 $38.25 $9,773 $31.87 $7,818 $25.50 25,000 $17,464 $19.07 $14,553 $15.89 $11,643 $12.71 - 50,000 $22,230 $44.46 $18,525 $37.05 $14,820 $29.64 B Laundromat 200 $2,803 $313.37 $2,336 $261.14 $1,868 $208.91 1,000 $5,310 $216.05 $4,425 $180.04 $3,540 $144.03 2,000 $7,470 $78.36 $6,225 $65.30 $4,980 $52.24 - 4,000 $9,037 $74.46 $7,531 $62.05 $6,025 $49.64 10,000 $13,505 $36.86 $11,254 $30.71 $9,003 $24.57 - 20,000 $17,190 $85.95 $14,325 $71.63 $11,460 $57.30 B Medical Office 2,000 $6,111 $66.60 $5,093 $55.50 $4,074 $44.40 10,000 $11,440 $50.41 $9,533 $42.01 $7,626 $33.61 - 20,000 $16,481 $17.68 $13,734 $14.73 $10,987 $11.78 - 40,000 $20,016 $15.64 $16,680 $13.03 $13,344 $10.43 - - 100,000 $29,400 $8.02 $24,500 $6.68 $19,600 $5.34 200,000 $37,416 $18.71 $31,180 $15.59 $24,944 $12.47 MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 17 of 24 10-92 1/18/07 -1:19 PM City of Chula Vista Planning & Building Department-Building Division Consolidated Schedule of New Construction Fees. PC & INSP COMBINED (All Construction Types) Construction Types: Construction Types: Construction Types: IFR,IIFR 1I,III,V-1 HR JI,III,IV,V-N Base Cost @ Cast for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each UBe Project Size Threshold Additional 1 00 Threshold Additional 1 00 Threshold Additional 1 DO Class use Occupancy TVDe Threshold Size s.f.~ Size s.f. '" Size s.f. . B Offices 2,000 $5,749 $63.05 $4,791 $52.54 $3,832 $42.03 - 10,000 $10,793 $46.66 $8,994 $38.88 $7,195 $31.10 - - 20,QOO $15,458 $16.50 $12,882 $13.75 $10,306 $11.00 - - 40,000 $18,758 $14.84 $15,632 $12.36 $12,506 $9.89 - 100,000 $27,660 $7.55 $23,050 $6.29 $18,440 $5.03 200,000 $35,208 $17.60 $29,340 $14.67 $23,472 $11.74 B HiQh Rise Office SuiJdinll 15,000 $17,019 $26.99 $17,019 $26.99 $13,615 $21.59 - - 75,000 $33,210 $14.42 $33,210 $14.42 $26,568 $11.54 - - 150,000 $44,025 $5.79 $44,025 $5.79 $35,220 $4.63 - 300,000 $52.710 $6.59 $52,710 $6.59 $42,168 $5.27 - 750,000 $82,350 $3.00 $82,350 $3.00 $65,880 $2.40 - - 1,500,000 $104,850 $6.99 $104,850 $6.99 $83,880 $5.59 B Hlqh Rise condo Buildinn 15,000 $17,519 $27.62 $17,519 $27.62 $14,015 $22.09 - 75,000 $34,088 $15.15 $34,088 $15.15 $27,270 $12.12 - - 150,000 $45,450 $6.00 $45,450 $6.00 $36,360 $4.80 - - 300,000 $54,450 $6.73 $54,450 $6.73 $43,560 $5.39 - 750,000 $84,750 $3.08 $84.750 $3.08 $67,800 $2.46 - - 1 500,000 $107,850 $7.19 $107,850 $7.19 $86,280 $5.75 E-1 Preschool/School 300 $3,563 $267.D1 $2,969 $222.51 $2,375 $178.D1 - - 1,500 $6,767 $180.35 $5,639 $150.29 $4,511 $120.23 - 3,000 $9.472 $65.93 $7,893 $54.94 $6,315 $43.95 - - 6,000 $11,450 $63.61 $9,542 $53.00 $7,633 $42.40 - - 15,000 $17,174 $31.25 $14,312 $26.04 $11,450 $20.83 - 30,000 $21,861 $72.87 $18.218 $60.73 $14,574 $48.58 E-' Preschool/School 300 $3,563 $267.01 $2,969 $222.51 $2,375 $178.01 - - 1,500 $6,767 $180.35 $5,639 $150.29 $4,511 $120.23 - - 3,000 $9,472 $65.93 $7,893 $54.94 $6,315 $43.95 - 6,000 $11,450 $63.61 $9,542 $53.00 $7,633 $42.40 - 15,000 $17,174 $31.25 $14,312 $26.04 $11,450 $20.83 - - 30,000 $21,861 $72.87 $18,218 $60.73 $14.574 $48.58 E-3 Davcare 300 $3,563 $267.D1 $2,969 $222.51 $2,375 $178.01 - - 1,500 $6,767 $180.35 $5,639 $150.29 $4,511 $120.23 - - 3,000 $9,472 $65.93 $7,B93 $54.94 $6,315 $43.95 - - 6,000 $11,450 $63.61 $9,542 $53.00 $7,633 $42.40 - 15,000 $17,174 $31.25 $14,312 $26.04 $11,450 $20.83 - 30,000 $21,861 $72.87 $18218 $60.73 $14,574 $48.58 F-1 Industrial/Manufacturing 1,000 $3,879 $85.74 $3,233 $71.45 $2,586 $57.16 - - 5,000 $7,309 $61.74 $6,091 $51.45 $4,B72 $41.16 - 10,000 $10,396 $22.04 $8,663 $18.37 $6,930 $14.70 - 20,000 $12,600 $20.26 $10,500 $16.88 $8,400 $13.51 - - 50,000 $18,678 $10.19 $15,565 $8.49 $12,452 $6.79 - - 100,000 $23,772 $23.77 $19.810 $19.81 $15.848 $15.85 F-2 Heavy Industrial 2,000 $5,959 $64.81 $4,966 $54.01 $3,972 $43.20 - - 10,000 $11.143 $49.39 $9,286 $41.16 $7,429 $32.93 - - 20,000 $16,082 $17.29 $13,402 $14.41 $10,722 $11.53 - 40,000 $19,541 $15.19 $16,284 $12.66 $13,027 $10.13 - 100,000 $28,656 $7.82 $23,880 $6.52 $19,104 $5.22 - - 200,000 $36,480 $18.24 $30,400 $15.20 $24,320 $12.16 MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 18 of 24 10-93 1/18/07 - 1 :19 PM City of Chula Vista Planning & Building Department-Building Division Consolidated Schedule of New Construction Fees. PC & INSP COMBINED (All Construction Types) Construction Types: Construction Types: Construction Types: IFR,IIFR 1I,III,V.1 HR 11,111, IV, V-N Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each use Project Size Threshold Additional 1 00 Threshold Additional 100 Threshold Additional 1 00 Class uee Occupancy Type Threshold Size s.f. . Size s.f. . Size sJ.* H-1 High Explosion Hazard 500 $3,013 $130.10 $3,013 $130.10 $2,411 $104.08 - 2,500 $5,615 $101.83 $5,615 $101.83 $4,492 $81.46 - 5,000 $8,161 $35.32 $8,161 $35.32 $6,529 $28.26 - 10,000 $9,927 $30.39 $9,927 $30.39 $7,942 $24.31 - - 25,000 $14,485 $15.84 $14,485 $15.84 $11,588 $12.67 - - 50,000 $18,445 $36.89 $18,445 $36.89 $14,756 $29.51 H-2 Moderate Explosion Hazard 1,000 $3,429 $75.89 $3,429 $75.89 $2,743 $60.71 - - 5,000 $6,465 $54.37 $6,465 $54.37 $5,172 $43.50 - - 10,000 $9,183 $19.45 $9,183 $19.45 $7,346 $15.56 - - 20,000 $11,128 $17.94 $11,128 $17.94 $8,902 $14.35 - . - SO,OOO $16,510 $9.02 $16,510 $9.02 $13,208 $7.22 - - 100,000 $21,020 $21.02 $21,020 $21.02 $16,816 $16.82 H-3 High Fire Hazard 1,000 $3,462 $76.53 $3,462 $76.53 $2,770 $61.22 - - 5,000 $6,524 $55.09 $6,524 $55.09 $5,219 $44.07 - 10,000 $9,278 $19.68 $9,278 $19.68 $7,422 $15.74 20,000 $11,246 $18.08 $11,246 $18.08 $8,997 $14.46 - 50,000 $16,670 $9.10 $16,670 $9.10 $13,336 $7.28 100,000 $21,220 $21.22 $21,220 $21.22 $16,976 $16.98 H-4 Repair Garage 300 $2,957 $218.21 $2,464 $181.85 $1,971 $145.48 - 1,500 $5,576 $156.19 $4,646 $130.16 $3,717 $104.13 - 3,000 $7,919 $55.90 $6,599 $46.58 $5,279 $37.26 - 6,000 $9,595 $51.60 $7,996 $43.00 $6,397 $34.40 - - 15,000 $14,240 $25.91 $11,867 $21.59 $9,493 $17.27 30,000 $18,126 $60.42 $15,105 $50.35 $12,084 $40.28 H-5 Aircraft HanCler/Repairs 1,000 $3,864 $81.31 $3,220 $67.76 $2,576 $54.21 - 5,000 $7,116 $69.27 $5,930 $57.73 $4,744 $46.18 - . - 10,000 $10,580 $23.36 $8,816 $19.46 $7,053 $15.57 - - 20,000 $12,915 $18.75 $10,763 $15.63 $8,610 $12.50 - - 50,000 $18,540 $10.14 $15,450 $8.45 $12,360 $6.76 100,000 $23,610 $23.61 $19,675 $19.68 $15,740 $15.74 H-6 Semiconductor Fabrication 1,000 $4,081 $90.76 $3,401 $75.63 $2,721 $60.51 - - 5,000 $7,712 $63.90 $6,427 $53.25 $5,141 $42.60 - - 10,000 $10,907 $23.00 $9,089 $19.17 $7,271 $15.34 - 20,000 $13,207 $21.50 $11,006 $17.91 $8,805 $14.33 - SO,OOO $19,656 $10.73 $16,380 $8.94 $13,104 $7.15 - 100,000 $25,020 $25.02 $20,850 $20.85 $16,680 $16.68 H-7 Health Hazard Materials 500 $3,505 $154.86 $2,921 $129.05 $2,337 $103.24 - 2,500 $6,602 $111.72 $5,502 $93.10 $4,402 $74.48 - 5,000 $9,395 $39.88 $7,830 $33.23 $6,264 $26.58 - - 10,000 $11,389 $36.57 $9,491 $30.48 $7,593 $24.38 - - 25,000 $16,875 $18.44 $14,063 $15.37 $11,250 $12.30 50,000 $21,486 $42.97 $17,905 $35.81 $14,324 $28.65 1~1.1 Nursery. Full~lime (5+) 200 $2,634 $296.40 $2,195 $247.00 $1,756 $197.60 - 1,000 $5,005 $199.36 $4,171 $166.13 $3,337 $132.90 - 2,000 .$6,998 $72.98 $5,832 $60.82 $4,666 $48.66 - 4,000 $8,458 $70.63 $7,048 $58.86 $5,639 $47.09 10,000 $12,696 $34.66 $10,580 $28.88 $8,464 $23.10 20,000 $16,162 $80.81 $13,468 $67.34 $10,774 $53.87 MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 190124 1/18/07 -1:19 PM 10-94 City of Chula Vista Planning & Building Department-Building Division Consolidated Schedule of New Construction Fees. PC & INSP COMBINED (All Construction Types) Construction Types: Construction Types: Construction Types: I FR,IIFR 1I,III,V-1 HR 11.111, IV, V-N BaS8 Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each use use Occupancy TYpe Project SIze Threshold Additional 1 00 Threshold Additional 100 Threshold Additional 100 Class Threshold SIze s.f. * SI:z:e s.f. . Size s.t. . 1-1.2 Health Care Centers 500 $3,474 $153.34 $2,895 $127.79 $2,316 $102.23 - - 2.500 $6,541 $111.01 $5,451 $92.51 $4,361 $74.01 - 5,000 $9,316 $39.56 $7,764 $32.97 $6,211 $26.38 - 10,000 $11,294 $36.20 $9,412 $30.17 $7,530 $24.14 - - 25,000 $16,725 $18.28 $13,938 $15.23 $11,150 $12.18 - - 50,000 $21,294 $42.59 $17,745 $35.49 $14,196 $28.39 1-2 Nursine Heme/Assisted Livinc 250 $3,317 $289.34 $2,764 $241.11 $2,211 $192.89 - 1,250 $6,210 $218.51 $5,175 $182.09 $4,140 $145.67 - - 2,500 $8,941 $76.70 $7,451 $63.92 $5,961 $51.14 - 5,000 $10,859 $67.94 $9,049 $56.61 $7,239 $45.29 12,500 $15,954 $34.85 $13,295 $29.04 $10,636 $23.23 - - 25,000 $20,310 $81.24 $16,925 $67.70 $13,540 $54.16 1-3 Mental Hospital/Jail 2,500 $8,218 $74.09 $6,849 $61.74 $5,479 $49.39 - 12,500 $15,627 $49.58 $13,023 $41.32 $10,418 $33.06 - 25,000 $21,825 $18.18 $18,188 $15.15 $14,550 $12.12 - 50,000 $26,370 $17.66 $21,975 $14.72 $17,580 $11.77 - - 125,000 $39,615 $8.65 $33,013 $7.21 $26,410 $5.77 250 000 $50 430 $20.17 $42,025 $16.81 $33,620 $13.45 M Stores (Retail) 2,500 $7,568 $65.73 $6,307 $54.78 $5,046 $43.82 - 12,500 $14,141 $50.43 $11,784 $42.03 $9,428 $33.62 - - 25,000 $20,445 $17.61 $17,038 $14.68 $13,630 $11.74 - 50,000 $24,848 $15.40 $20,706 $12.83 $16,565 $10.26 - - 125,000 $36,394 $7.97 $30,328 $6.64 $24,263 $5.31 250,000 $46,350 $18.54 $38,625 $15.45 $30,900 $12.36 M Market 2,500 $7,568 $65.73 $6,307 $54.78 $5,046 $43.82 - 12,500 $14,141 $50.43 $11,784 $42.03 $9,428 $33.62 - 25,000 $20,445 $17.61 $17,038 $14.68 $13,630 $11.74 - 50,000 $24,848 $15.40 $20,706 $12.83 $16,565 $10.26 - 125,000 $36,394 $7.97 $30,328 $6.64 $24,263 $5.31 250,000 $46,350 $18.54 $38,625 $15.45 $30,900 $12.36 R-1 Apartment Bldg 800 $6,457 $182.73 $5,381 $152.28 $4,305 $121.82 - 4,000 $12,305 $120.18 $10,254 $100.15 58,203 $80.12 - 8,000 $17,112 $44.37 $14,260 $36.98 $11,408 $29,58 - - 16,000 $20,662 $43.66 $17,218 $36,38 $13,n4 $29.11 - - 40,000 $31,140 $21.24 $25,950 $17.70 $20,760 $14.16 80,000 $39,636 $49.55 $33,030 $41.29 $26,424 $33.03 R-1 Apartment Bldg ~ Repeat Unit 600 $2,327 $56.52 $1,939 $47.10 $1,551 $37.68 - - 4,000 $4,136 $61.10 $3,446 $50.92 $2,757 $40.74 - - 8,000 $6,580 $19.22 $5,483 $16.02 $4,387 $12.82 - 16,000 $8,118 $12.48 $6,765 $10.40 $5,412 $8.32 - 40,000 $11,112 $7.62 $9,260 $6.35 $7,408 $5.06 80,000 $14,160 $17.70 $11,800 $14.75 $9,440 $11.80 R-1 Hotels & Motels 5,000 $7,711 $33.42 $6,426 $27.85 $5.140 $22.28 - 25,000 $14,394 $25.82 $11,995 $21.52 $9,596 $17.22 - - 50,000 $20,850 $8.99 $17,375 $7.49 $13,900 $5.99 - - 100,000 $25,344 $7.82 $21,120 $6.52 $16,896 $5.22 - - 250,000 $37,080 $4.06 $30,900 $3.38 $24,720 $2.70 500,000 $47,220 $9.44 $39,350 $7.87 $31,480 $6.30 MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 20 of 24 1/18/07 -1:19 PM 10-95 City of Chula Vista Planning & Building Department-Building Division Consolidated Schedule of New Construction Fees. PC & INSP COMBINED (All Construction Types) Construction Types: Construction Types: Construction Types: I FR,II FR II, III, V-1 HR 1I.1II,IV,V-N Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each UBC Project Size Threshold Additional 100 Threshold Additional 1 00 Threshold Additional 100 Class UBe Occuoancv Tvoe Threshold Size s.f. .. Size s.f. * Size sJ. . R-1 Hotels & Motels ~ Phased Permits 5,000 $8,615 $38.17 $7,179 $31.81 $5,743 $25.44 - 25,000 $16,248 $27.26 $13,540 $22.72 $10,832 $18.18 - SO,QOO $23,064 $9.77 $19,220 $8.14 $15,376 $6.51 - 100,000 $27,948 $9.03 $23,290 $7.52 $18.632 $6.02 - 250,000 $41,490 $4.82 $34,575 $3.77 $27,660 $3.02 500,000 $52,800 $10.58 $44,000 $8.80 $35,200 $7.04 R-3 DwellinCls . Custom 1,500 $5,681 $42.59 $4.734 $35.49 $3,787 $28.40 - 2,500 $6,107 $142.04 $8.089 $118.37 $4,071 $94.70 - 3,500 $7,527 $85.21 $6,272 $71.00 $5,018 $56.80 5,000 $8,805 $59.18 $7,338 $49.32 $5,870 $39.45 - 8,000 $10,580 $50.71 $8,817 $42.26 $7.054 $33.81 15,000 $14,130 $94.20 $11,n5 $78.50 $9,420 $62.80 R-3 Dwellin9s - Model 1,500 $6,320 $71.02 $5,266 $59.18 $4,213 $47.35 - 2,500 $7,030 $85.21 $5,858 $71.01 $4,687 $56.81 - - 3,500 $7,882 $85.20 $6,568 $71.00 $5,255 $56.80 - - 5,000 $9,160 $49.72 $7,633 $41.43 $6,107 $33.14 - - 8,000 $10,651 $45.65 $8,876 $38.04 $7,101 $30.43 15,000 $13,847 $92.31 $11,539 $76.93 $9,231 $61.54 R-3 Dwellinas . Production Phase 1,500 $3,026 $36.23 $2,522 $30.19 $2,018 $24.15 of Master Plan 2,500 $3,389 $48.29 $2,824 $40.24 $2,259 $32.19 (repeats) 3,500 $3,871 $53.26 $3,226 $44.38 $2,581 $35.51 - - 5,000 $4,670 $34.21 $3,892 $28.50 $3,114 $22.80 - - 8,000 $8,696 $24.34 $4,747 $20.28 $3,798 $16.23 15,000 $7,400 $49.34 $6,167 $41.11 $4,934 $32.89 R-3 OwellinCls . Altemate Materials 1,500 $6.504 $103.68 $5,420 $86.40 $4,336 $69.12 - 2,500 $7,541 $76.67 $6,284 $63.89 $5,027 $51.12 - 3.500 $8,308 $91.36 $6,923 $76.13 $5,538 $60.91 - - 5,000 $9,678 $86.88 $8,065 $72.40 $6,452 $57.92 - - 8,000 $12,284 $35.30 $10,237 $29.42 $8,190 $23.53 15,000 $14,756 $98.37 $12.296 $81.98 $9,837 $65.58 R- 2.1, Group Care, Non-Amb. (6+) 2,000 $5,969 $65.25 $4,974 $54.37 $3,979 $43.50 2.3 & 6.1 - 10,000 $11,189 $48.86 $9,324 $40.72 $7,459 $32.58 - - 20,000 $16,075 $17.21 $13,396 $14.34 $10.717 $11.47 - - 40,000 $19,517 $15.33 $16,264 $12.78 $13,011 $10.22 - 100,000 $28,716 $7.84 $23,930 $6.53 $19,144 $8.22 200,000 $36.582 $18.28 $30,460 $15.23 $24,368 $12.18 R-2.2 & Group Care, Ambulatory (6+) 2,000 $5,969 $65.25 $4,974 $54.37 $3,979 $43.50 6.20 10,000 $11,189 $48.86 $9,324 $40.72 $7,459 $32.58 - 20,000 $16,075 $17.21 $13,396 $14.34 $10,717 $11.47 - 40,000 $19,517 $15.33 $16,264 $12.78 $13,011 $10.22 - 100,000 $28,716 $7.84 $23,930 $6.53 $19,144 $5.22 200,000 $36,552 $18.28 $30,460 $15.23 $24,368 $12.18 R-2.1.1, Group Care, Non-Amb. (1-5) 200 $2,898 $316.32 $2,415 $263.60 $1,932 $210.88 2.3.1 & - 1,000 $5,429 $238.20 $4,524 $198.50 $3,619 $158.80 6.1.1 - 2,000 $7,811 $83.70 $6,509 $69.75 $5,207 $58.80 - 4,000 $9,485 $74.30 $7,904 $61.91 $6,323 $49.53 10,000 $13,943 $38.09 $11,619 $31.74 $9,295 $25.39 20,000 $17,751 $88.76 $14,793 $73.96 $11,834 $59.17 MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 21 of 24 1/18/07 -1:19 PM 10-96 City of Chula Vista Planning & Building Department-Building Division Consolidated Schedule of New Construction Fees - PC & INSP COMBINED (All Construction Types) Construction TYpes: Construction Types: Construction Types: I FR,IIFR 11,111, V-1 HR II,III,IV, V~N Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each USC Project Size Threshold Additional 1 00 Threshold Additional 1 00 Threshold Additional 100 Class uae Occupancy TYpe Threshold Size s.t. . Size s.f. . Size s.t. . R-2.2.1 & Group Care, Amb. (1.5) 200 $2,898 $316.32 $2,415 $263.60 $1,932 $210.88 6.2.1 - 1,000 $5,429 $238.20 $4,524 $198.50 $3,619 $158.80 - - 2,000 $7,811 $83.70 $6,509 $69.75 $5,207 $55.80 4,000 $9,485 $74.30 $7,904 $61.91 $6,323 $49.53 10,000 $13,943 $38.09 $11,619 $31.7' $9,295 $25.39 20,000 $17,751 $88.76 $14,793 $73.96 $11,834 $59.17 5-1 Moderate Hazard Storage 1,000 $4,182 $92.52 $3,485 $77.10 $2,788 $61.68 - - 5,000 $7,883 $66.38 $6,569 $55.32 $5,255 $44.26 - 10,000 $11,202 $23.72 $9,335 $19.n $7,468 $15.82 - - 20,000 $13,574 $21.87 $11,312 $16.23 $9,050 $14.58 - - 50,000 $20,136 $10.99 $16,780 $9.16 $13,424 $7.33 100,000 $25,632 $25.63 $21,360 $21.36 $17,088 $17.09 5-1 Self Storage 2,000 $4,854 $52.60 $4,045 $43.83 $3,238 $35.06 10,000 $9,061 $40.60 $7,551 $33.63 $6,041 $27.06 - - 20,000 $13,121 $14.15 $10,934 $11.79 $8,747 $9.43 - - 40,000 $15,950 $12.32 $13,292 $10.26 $10,634 $8.21 - 100,000 $23,340 $6.37 $19,450 $5.31 $15,560 $425 200,000 $29,712 $14.86 $24,760 $12.38 $19808 $9.90 5-2 Low Hazard Storage 1,000 $4,062 $88.56 $3,385 $73.80 $2,706 $59.04 - - 5,000 $7,604 $66.96 $6,337 $55.80 $5,070 $44.64 - - 10,000 $10,952 $23.48 $9,127 $19.57 $7,302 $15.66 - 20,000 $13,301 $20.80 $11,084 $17.34 $8,867 $13.87 - - 50,000 $19,542 $10.67 $16,285 $8.89 $13,028 $7.11 100,000 $24,876 $24.88 $20,730 $20.73 $16,584 $16.58 5-3 Renair Garaae 1,000 $4,062 $88.56 $3,385 $73.60 $2.706 $59.04 - I (not H-41 5,000 $7,604 $66.96 $6,337 $55.80 $5,070 $44.64 - 10,000 $10,952 $23.48 $9,127 $19.57 $7,302 $15.66 - 20,000 $13,301 $20.80 $11,084 $17.34 $8,867 $13.87 - - 50,000 $19,542 $10.67 $16,285 $8.89 $13,028 $7.11 100,000 $24.876 $24.88 $20,730 $20.73 $16,584 $16.58 5-3 Fuel Dispensina Canaoy 100 $1,485 $354.10 $1,237 $295.08 $990 $236.07 - - 500 $2,901 $186.68 $2,417 $155.56 $1,934 $124.45 - - 1,000 $3,834 $75.39 $3,195 $62.83 $2,556 $50.26 - - 2,000 $4,588 $86.56 $3,824 $72.13 $3,059 $57.71 - 5,000 $7,185 $39.18 $5,988 $32.65 $4,790 $26.12 - 10,000 $9,144 $91.44 $7,620 $76.20 $6,096 $60.96 5-3 Parkina Garage 1,000 $5,275 $112.76 $4,396 $93.96 $3,517 $75.17 - 5,000 $9,785 591.26 $6,166 $76.05 $6,62' $60.84 - 10,000 $14,348 $31.31 $11,957 $26.09 $9,566 $20.87 - 20,000 $17,479 $26.22 $14,566 $21.85 $11,653 $17.48 - 50,000 $25,344 $13.85 $21,120 $11.54 $16,896 $9.23 100,000 $32,268 $32.27 $26,890 $26.89 $21,512 $21.51 5-4 Open Parking Garage 1,000 $5,131 $110.00 $4,276 $91.67 $3,421 $73.34 - 5,000 $9,532 $88.18 $7,943 $73.48 $6,354 $58.78 - 10,000 $13,940 $30.32 $11,617 $25.27 $9,294 $20.22 - - 20,000 $16,973 $25.60 $14,144 $21.34 $11,315 $17.07 - 50,000 $24,654 $13.48 $20,545 $11.23 $16,436 $8.9B 100,000 $31,392 $31.39 $26,160 $26.16 $20,928 $20.93 MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 22 of 24 1/18/07 -1:19 PM 10-97 City of Chula Vista Planning & BUilding Department-Building Division Consolidated Schedule of New Construction Fees. PC & INSP COMBINED (All Construction Types) Construction Types: Construction Types: Construction Types: IFR,IIFR 1I,III,V-1 HR II, III,IV, V.N Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each UBe Project Size Threshold Additional 100 Threshold Additional10Q Threshold Additional 100 Class use Occupancy Tvpe Threshold Size s.t.. Slx" s.t. . Size s.l. . 5-5 Aircraft Hanger & Helistops 500 $3,840 $163.35 $3,200 $136.12 $2,560 $108.90 - - 2,500 $7,107 $134.39 $5,922 $111.99 $4,738 $89.59 - 5,000 $10,466 $45.83 $8,722 $38.19 $6,978 $30.55 - 10,000 $12,758 $37.88 $10,631 $31.56 $8,505 $25.25 - 25,000 $18,439 $20.18 $15,366 $16.81 $12,293 $13.45 50,000 $23,483 $46.97 $19,569 $39.14 $15,655 $31.31 U-1 Private Garages/Accessory Buildings 100 $1,353 $312.31 $1,127 $260.26 $902 $2Q8.21 - (also need 10 add a repeat category) 500 $2,602 $189.72 $2,168 $158.10 $1,735 $126.48 - - 1,000 $3,550 $72.23 $2,959 $60.19 $2,367 $48.15 - 2,000 $4,273 $75.28 $3,561 $62.73 $2,848 $50.19 5,000 $6,531 $35.64 $5,443 $29.70 $4,354 $23.76 10,000 $8,313 $83.13 $6,928 $69.28 $5,542 $55.42 '-2 Convalescent Hospital 200 $3,247 $366.21 $2,706 $305.18 $2,165 $244.14 - 1,000 $6,177 $244.34 $5,147 $203.61 $4,118 $162.89 - 2,000 $8,620 $89.70 $7,184 $74.75 $5,747 $59.80 - - 4,000 $10,414 $87.36 $8,679 $72.80 $6,943 $58.24 - - 10,000 $15,656 $42.74 $13,046 $35.61 $10,437 $28.49 20,000 $19,929 $99.65 $16,608 $83.04 $13,286 $66.43 A Restaurant TI 300 $2,672 $204.72 $2,227 $170.60 $1,781 $136.48 - 1,500 $5,129 $126.72 $4,274 5105.60 $3,419 $84.48 - - 3,000 $7,029 $47.90 $5,858 $39.91 $4,686 $31.93 - 6,000 $8,466 $49.26 $7,055 $41.05 $5,644 $32.84 15,000 $12,899 $23.45 $10,749 $19.54 $8,600 $15.63 30,000 $16,416 $54.72 $13,680 $45.60 $10,944 $36.48 B Office Tenant Improvement 300 $2,315 $176.48 $1,929 $147.07 $1,544 $117.66 1,500 $4,433 $111.56 $3,694 $92.96 $2,955 $74.37 3,000 $6,107 $41.82 $5,089 $34.85 $4,071 $27.88 6,000 $7,361 $42.36 $6,134 $35.30 $4,907 $28.24 - 15,000 $11,174 $20.31 $9,311 $16.93 $7,449 $13.54 30,000 $14,220 $47.40 $11,850 $39.50 $9,480 $31.60 B Medical Office Tenant lmprovement 300 $2,456 $188.22 $2,047 $156.85 $1,638 $125.48 - - 1,500 $4,715 $116.45 $3,929 $97.04 $3,143 $77.63 - - 3,000 $6,462 $44.03 $5,385 $36.69 $4,308 $29.35 - - 6,000 $7,782 $45.28 $6,485 $37.73 $5,188 $30.19 - - 15,000 $11,858 $21.57 $9,881 $17.98 $7,905 $14.38 30,000 $15,093 $50.31 $12,578 $41.93 $10,062 $33.54 E AllETI 300 $1,998 $154.87 $1,665 $129.06 $1,332 $103.25 - - 1,500 $3,856 $91.32 $3,214 $76.10 $2,571 $60.88 - - 3,000 $5,226 $35.17 $4,355 $29.31 $3,484 $23.45 6,000 $6,281 $37.47 $5,234 $31.22 $4,188 $24.98 15,000 $9,653 $17.53 $8,045 $14.61 $6,436 $11.69 30,000 $12,283 $40.94 $10,236 $34.12 $8,189 $27.30 , I Occupancy Tl 300 $2,091 $162.98 $1,742 $135.82 $1,394 $108.66 1,500 $4,046 $93,79 $3,372 $78.16 $2,698 $62.53 3,000 $5,453 $36.50 $4,544 $30.42 $3,636 $24.34 6,000 $6,548 $39.52 $5,457 $32.93 $4,366 $26.35 15,000 $10,105 $18.36 $8,421 $15.30 $6,737 $12.24 30,000 $12,859 $42.86 $10,716 $35.72 $8,573 $28.58 H Hazardous Occupancy TI 300 $2,688 $208.52 $2,240 $173.76 $1,792 $139.01 1,500 $5,190 $122.61 $4,325 $102.18 $3,460 $81.74 - 3,000 $7,029 $47.30 $5,858 $39.41 $4,686 $31.53 - - 6,000 $8,448 $50.43 $7,040 $42.03 $5,632 $33.62 - - 15,000 $12,987 $23.61 $10,823 $19.68 $8,658 $15.74 30,000 $16,529 $55.10 $13,774 $45.91 $11,019 $36.73 MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 23 of 24 1/16/07 -1:19 PM 10-98 City of Chula Vista Planning & Building Department-Building Division Consolidated Schedule of New Construction Fees - PC & INSP COMBINED (All Construction Types) Construction Types: Construction Types: Construction Types: I FR, II FR 1I,III,V-1 HR II,III,IV,V-N Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each Base Cost @ Cost for Each UBe Project Size Threshold Additional 100 Threshold Additional 1 00 Threshold Additional 100 Class use Occupancy Type Threshold Siz. 5.1. .. Siz. s.f. .. Size s.f. .. M RetailTJ 300 $2,406 $185.05 $2,005 $154.21 $1,604 $123.37 - 1,500 $4,627 $112.83 $3,656 $94.03 $3,085 $75.22 - - 3,000 $6.319 $42.92 $5,266 $35.76 $4,213 $28.61 - - 6.000 $7,607 $44.58 $6,339 $37.15 $5,071 $29.72 - - 15,000 $11.619 $21.12 $9,683 $17.60 $7,746 $14.08 30,000 $14,787 $49.29 $12.323 $41.08 $9,858 $32.86 - All Other TI (not listed above) 300 $2.656 $200.94 $2,213 $167.45 $1,771 $133.96 - - 1,500 $5,067 $130.82 $4,223 $109.01 $3,378 $87.21 - - 3,000 $7,029 $48.50 $5,658 $40.41 $4,686 $32.33 - 6,000 $8,484 $48.06 $7,070 $40.05 $5,656 $32.04 - - 15,000 $12,809 $23.33 $10,674 $19.44 $8,540 $15.55 30,000 $16,309 $54.36 $13,590 $45.30 $10,872 $36.24 SHELL BUILDINGS - All Shell Buildinos 1,000 $4,467 $98.22 $3,723 $81.85 $2,978 $65.48 - - 5,000 $6,396 $72.08 $6,997 $60.06 $5,598 $46.05 - - 10,000 $12,000 $26.58 $10,000 $21.30 $8,000 $17.04 - - 20,000 $14,556 $23.16 $12.130 $19.30 $9,704 $15.44 - 50,000 $21,503 $11.75 $17,919 $9.79 $14,335 $7.83 100,000 $27,375 $27.38 $22,813 $22.81 $18,250 $18.25 Each additional 1 00 square feet, or portion thereof, up to the next highest project size threshold. MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 24 of 24 1/18/07 -1:19 PM 10-99 City of Chula Vista MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES Planning & Building Department-Building Division ~ Estimated Actual Unit Cost. Time based on a per- Fee Types (in minutes) minute rate of $ 2.28 ADMINISTRATIVE AND MISC. FEES Permit Issuance (includes travel documentation) 65.00 $ 193.84 MECHANICAL PERMIT FEES Stand Alone Mechanical Plan Check (hourlv rate) 60.00 $ 136.83 UNIT FEES: NC Residential) - each 4. $ 102.62 Furnaces (FA.U. Floor) 45 $ 102.62 Heater (Wain 45 $ 102.62 Aooliance VenUChimnev fOntv) 4' $ 102.62 RefriaeraUon Comoressor 4' $ 102.62 Boiler 45 $ 102.62 Chiller 105 $ 239.45 Heal Pump (Packaoe Unit) 45 $ 102.62 Heater (Unit Radiant etc.) 4. $ 102.62 Air Handler 45 $ 102_62 Duct Work onlv 45 S 102.62 Evaporative Cooler 4' $ 102.62 Make-uo Air System 4. S 102.62 Moisture Exhaust Duct Clothes Drver\ 45 S 102.62 Vent Fan (Sim:!le Duct) - each 45 $ 102.62 Vent System 45 $ 102.62 Exhaust Hood and Duct fResidential\ 45 $ 102.62 Exhaust Hood - T e I Commercial Grease Hood) 105 $ 239.45 Exhaust Hood - Tvpe II (Commercial Steam Hood) 105 S 239.45 Non-Residential Incinerator 165 $ 376.28 Refrioerator Condenser Remote 4. $ 102.62 Walk-in BoxlRetriaerator Coil 75 $ 171.04 $ Other Mechanicallnsoections (oer hour) 60.00 $ 136.83 3191 $ C) I ~ 92 $ 112.87 36 $ 91.70 36 $ 45.37 C) C) MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 1 of 3 Potential Revenue @ Actual Annual Current Surplusl Current Fee Cost (Subsidy) (Bv U"Us) 11$ 1$ 61.8751 $ (61.875)1 $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ - 1$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 10384 $ 9441 $ 943 $ 3301 $ 3694 $ (393 $ 1,633 $ 3694 $ {2061 $ - 1$ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ . $ - $ - 1$ - $ - 1$ - $ - 1$ - $ - 1$ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ . $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - 1118/07 - 1:17 PM ~ o I ~ o ~ City of Chu/a Vista MECHANICAL, PLUMBING. AND ELECTRICAL PERMIT fEES Planning & Building Department-Building Division Estimated Actual Unit Cost. Time based on Iii per- Fee Types (in minutes) minute rate of $ 2.28 PLUMBING/GAS PERMIT FEES Stand Alone Plumblnn Plan Check (hourlv ratel 60.00 I 136.83 I - UNIT FEES: I - I Fixtures (first 5 fixturesl 45 I 102.62 Fixtures {each add'j fixture\ 10 Gas SYstem - New/Renair/Re lace Incl 5 outlets\ 45 I 102.62 Gas Outlets (Each Additional) 10 I 22.81 Buitdina Sewer 45 I 102.62 Grease Tran/lntercentor 45 I 102.62 Backflow Preventer IFirst 5\ 105 I 239.45 Backflow Preventer 'More than 5 - each 15 I 34.21 Roof Drain - Rainwater System 45 I 102.62 Water Heater First Heater) 45 I 102.62 Water Heater Each Additional Heaterl 15 I 34.21 Water PI e Renair/RenJacement 45 I 102.62 Drain-Vent Renair/Alteratlons 45 I < 102.62 DrinkinQ Fountain 45 I 102.62 Solar Water Sustem Fixtures soJar oanels tanks water treatment eouiomenU 45 I 102.82 Gravwater Svstems Iner hour\ 60 I 136.83 Medical Gas Svstem . New 160 I 410.49 Medical Gas Svstem Inew outlet reoair or reolace svstem\ 45 I 102.62 New Gas Meter 45 I 102.62 Reset Gas Meter 45 I 102.62 Sewer Lateral 45 < 102.62 < Other Plumbinn and Gas lnsnections (per hour\ 60.00 I 136.83 Potential Revenue @ Actual Annual Current Surplusl Current Fee Cost (Subsidy) (8v Unils' 90 55.20 392 $ 34.75 5 I 81.90 97 $ 106.00 5 $ 36.25 16 I< 75.94 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - I - $ - I - $ - $ - $ - $ - 4968 I 9236 $ 4268 $ - I< - I< - $ - I - $ - . - $ - I - $ - $ - $ - I - $ - I - $ - $ - $ - I. 13622 I. 40 228 . /26 606 $ 410 I 171 $ 236 $ 10282 $ 9954 $ 326 I - I - I - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - I - $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - I 161 $ 513 I 332 I 1367 . 1647 I 460 I - $ - $ I - $ - - I - $ - 1$ - MAXIMUS. Inc. Page 2 of 3 1/18/07 -1:17 PM ~ o I ~ o N City of Chula Vista MECHANICAL, PLUMBING, AND ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES Planning & Building Department-Building Division Estimated Actual Unit Cost ~ Time based on a perw Fee Types (in minutes) minute rale of $ 2.28 ELECTRICAL PERMIT FEES Stand Alone Electrical Plan Check hourly rale) 60.00 $ 136.83 $ - Temoorarv Power Pole 4' $ 102.62 Temporarv or Permanent Service Pedestal 4' $ 102.62 Tern orarv Liohtino System 4' $ 102.62 Temoorarv Power on a Permanent Base 4' $ 102.62 CATV Electrical Meier Enclosure wI or w/o aas 4' $ 102.62 New Electric Meter 4' $ 102.62 Uoorade of Existina Electrical Service 4' , 102.62 Resellinn of Each Electrical Meter 4' $ 102.62 Overhead to Undernround Conversion 7' $ 171.04 Miscellaneous Wirinn/Conduit incl. mechanical annaratus\ 7' $ 171.04 $ Other EJectricallnsnections {ner hour' 60.00 $ 136.83 , - MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 3 of 3 Annual Volume {#ofUnJls\ Average Current Fee {PerUnit\ 7B $ 117.25 14 $ 98.88 3 $ 66.00 1 $ 135.25 137 $ 112.22 5 $ 62.65 55 $ 90.36 Potential Revenue @ Actual Annual Currenl Surplusl Current Fee Cost (Subsidy) IBv Units} $ $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ 9146 $ 8,005 $ 1141 $ 1384 $ 1437 $ /52 $ - $ - $ - $ 19B $ 30B $ {110 $ - $ - $ - $ 135 $ 103 $ 33 $ 15374 $ 14059 $ 1315 . 313 $ 513 ; {200 $ - $ - . - $ 4970 $ 9407 $ 4437 $ $ - $ - . $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - Total Revenues: I $ 77,668 I $ 174,486 I $ 196,81711 1/18/07 -1:17 PM ~ o I ~ o w City of Chula Vista POTENTIAL FEE SCHEDULE FOR MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS Planning & Building Department-Building Division Intake and Plan Check Actual Inspection Total Actual Work Item Unit Cost Actual Cost Cost Standard Hourly Rate $1a9 $189 $1a9 Antenna Dish> 2ft each $426.04 $37a.70 $805 Cellular/Mobile Phone, free-standing each $426.04 $37a.70 $a05 Cellular/Mobile Phone, attached to building each $426.04 $378.70 $805 Equipment Sheller (larger than 1000 sf uses New up to 1000 sf, Construction Table) each $520.71 $473.3a $994 Awning/Canopy (supported by bullding) - Residential each $520.71 $1a9.35 $710 Awning/Canopy (supported by building) - Commercial each $804.74 $568.05 $1,373 Balcony addition each $615.39 $568.05 $1,183 Carport each $615.39 $37a.70 $994 Certificate of Occupancy each $94.11 $94.6a $1B9 Close Existing Openings Interior wall each $284.03 $189.35 $473 Exterior wall each $284.03 $189.35 $473 CommercJal Coach (per unit) each unit $520.71 $378.70 $899 Deck ~ City Standard Design first 300 sf $331.36 $284.03 $615 Deck ea add'I100 sf $47.34 $47.34 $95 Deck - Special Design first 300 sf $a04.74 $378.70 $1,1a3 Deck ea add'I1 00 sf $47.34 $47.34 $95 Demolition Interior each $142.Q1 $1a9.35 $331 Exterior each $236.69 $189.35 $426 Door New door (structural shear walUmasonrv) each $615.39 $284.03 $899 Replacement Job Card each $31.62 $94.6a $126 Fence or Freestanding Wall (non-masonry) up to 1001.1. $142.D1 $189.35 $331 Each additional 100 If each 100 1.1. $0.00 $47.34 $47 Fence or Freestanding Wall (masonry) Masonry, Standard UD to 100 Lt. $142.01 $284.03 $426 Each additional 100 If each 100 l.t. $0.00 $47.34 $47 Masonry, Special Design each 1001.1. $473.38 $37a.70 $a52 Each additional 100 If each 100 I.f. $0.00 $94.68 $95 Fireplace Masonry & Special Design each $568.05 $568.05 $1,136 Pre-Fabricated/Metal each $378.70 $378.70 $757 Annual Volume Average (# of Units) Current Fee 0 $ - 2 $ 1.782 2 $ 66a 22 $ 233 ao $ 194 6a $ 394 Potential Current Revenue @ Actual Annual Surplus' Current Fee Cosl (Subsidy) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ 3,565 $ 2,746 $ a19 $ - $ - $ - $ 1,335 $ 1,988 $ (653 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 5,122 $ 13,539 $ (8,417 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 15,524 $ 34,083 $ (18,559) $ - $ - $ - $ 26,a14 $ 57.941 $ (31,127 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $. - $ - $ - MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 1015 1/18/07 -1:17 PM ~ o I ~ o ~ City of Chula Vista POTENTIAL FEE SCHEDULE FOR MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS Planning & Building Department-Building Division Intake and Plan Check Actual Inspection Total Actual Work Item Unit Cost Actual Cost Cost Flag Pole first poleJea $331.36 $189.35 $521 each add'l pole each $31.62 $47.34 $79 Lighting pole first pole/ea $284.03 $284.03 $568 each add'l pole each $15.72 $28.40 $44 Manufactured Home on Continuous Footing each $56B.05 $378.70 $947 Modular Structures each $662.73 $378.70 $1,041 Move-on House each $757.40 $757.40 $1,515 Partition - Commercial, Interior (up to 30 l.t.) up 10 30 I.f. $331.36 $189.35 $521 Additional partition each 30 I.f. $94.68 $47.34 $142 Partition ~ Residential, Interior (up to 30 Lt.) up to 30 J.f. $331.36 $189.35 $521 Additional partition each 30 Lt. $47.34 $47.34 $95 Patio Cover/Covered Porch ~ Standard Wood frame up to 300 s.t. $236.69 $284.03 $521 Metal frame up to 300 d. $236.69 $189.35 $426 Other frame up to 300 s.f. $236.69 $568.05 $805 Additional patio each 300 s.f. $0.00 $47.34 $47 Enclosed, wood frame up 10 300 s.f. $473.38 $378.70 $852 Enclosed, metal frame up to 300 sJ. $473.38 $189.35 $663 Enclosed, other frame up to 300 s.f. $473.38 $284.03 $757 Additional enclosed patio each 300 s.f. $94.68 $47.34 $142 Palio Cover/Covered Porch ~ Special Wood frame up to 300 s.f. $331.36 $378.70 $710 Metal frame up to 300 d. $426.04 $378.70 $805 Other frame up to 300 sJ. $426.04 $757.40 $1,183 Additional patio each 300 s.f. $94.68 $47.34 $142 Enclosed, wood frame up to 300 sJ. $473.38 $473.38 $947 Enclosed, metal frame up to 300 d. $473.38 $264.03 $757 Enclosed, other frame up to 300 s.f. $473.38 $378.70 $852 Additional enclosed patio each 300 s.t. $94.68 $47.34 $142 Photovoltaic System. Residential each $568.05 $378.70 $947 Photovoltaic System - Commercial 1 to 16 panels each $710.06 $568.05 $1,278 each additional 8 panels each add'l $47.34 $94.68 $142 Stucco Applications up to 400 s.f. $189.35 $284.03 $473 Additional Stucco Application each 400 s.t. $0.00 $47.34 $47 . Annual Volume Average (i# of Units) Current Fee 1 $ 291 131 $ 226 103 $ 269 6 $ 246 7 $ 245 2 $ 45 Potential Current Revenue @ Actual Annual Surplusl Current Fee Cost (Subsidy) $ 291 $ 521 $ (230) $ $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 29,669 $ 68,213 $ (38,544) $ 27,745 $ 43,882 $ (16,137 $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ $ 1.477 $ 5,112 $ {3,635 $ 1,716 $ 4,639 $ (2,923) $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 90 $ 1,894 $ (1.604) $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ - MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 2 of 5 1/18/07 - 1:17 PM ~ o I ~ o C1I City of Chula Vista POTENTIAL FEE SCHEDULE FOR MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS Planning & Building Department-Building Division Intake and Plan Check Actual InspecUon Total Actual Work Item Unit Cost Actual Cost Cosl Retaining Wall (concrete Of masonry) - Standard 4ftorless up to 50 I.f. $284.03 $378.70 $663 Additional retaining wall each 50 I.f. $0.00 $47.34 $47 4ft- 8 ft up to 50 !.t. $426.04 $568.05 $994 Additional retaining wall each 50 I.f. $0.00 $94.68 $95 Retaining Wall (concrete or masonry) - Special Design 4 ft or less up to 50 1.1. $378.70 $568.05 $947 Additional retainIng wall each 50 U. $0.00 $47.34 $47 4ft-8 ft up to 50 1.1. $520.71 $757.40 $1,278 Additional retaining wall each 50 I.f. $0.00 $94.68 $95 8ft-12ft up to 50 1.1. $615.39 $1,230.78 $1,846 Additional retaining wall each 50 I.f. $0.00 $94.68 $95 >12 ft up to 50 I.f. $804.74 $1,514.80 $2,320 Additional retainina wall each 50 U. $0.00 $94.68 $95 Remodel - Residential Less than 300 5.1. up to 300 sJ. $662.73 $568.05 $1,231 Kitchen up 10 300 d. $710.06 $568.05 $1,278 Bath UD to 300 sJ. $662.73 $568.05 $1,231 Additional remodel each 300 s.t. $47.34 $189.35 $237 Re~root up to 100 sJ. $169.35 $189.35 $379 Additional Re-roof each 100 sJ. $0.00 $23.67 $24 Roof Structure Replacement up to 100 sJ. $568.05 $284.03 $852 Additional roof structure replacement each 100 s.t. $94.68 $47.34 $142 Room Addition - First Storv Up 10 300 s.t. up to 300 sJ. $757.40 $946.75 $1,704 Additional room addition each 300 sJ. $94.68 $378.70 $473 Room Addition - Multi~story Up to 300 d. up to 300 sJ. $804.74 $1,136.10 $1,941 Additional room addition each 300 sJ. $94.68 $378.70 $473 Sauna. steam each $378.70 $284.03 $663 Siding Stone and Brick Veneer (Interior or exterior) up to 400 d. $284.03 $169.35 $473 All Other up to 400 d. $284.03 $189.35 $473 Additional siding each 400 s.f. $47.34 $47.34 $95 Annual Volume Average (# of Units) Current Fee 203 $ 265 127 $ 144 220 $ 1,007 52 $ 1,232 Potential Current Revenue @ Actual Annual Surplusl Current Fee Cost (Subsidy) $ - $ - $ - $ 53,742 $ 134,533 $ 180,791 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 18.288 $ 46,095 $ (29,807) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 221,540 $ 374,913 $ 1153,373 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 64,056 $ 100,924 $ 136,867 $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ - MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 3 015 1/18/07 -1:17 PM City of Chu/a Vista POTENTIAL FEE SCHEDULE FOR MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS Planning & Building Department-Building Division ~ Intake and Plan Check Actual Inspection Total Actual Work Item Unit Cost Actual Cost Cost Signs Directional each $189.35 $378.70 $568 Each additional Directional Sign each $31.62 $47.34 $79 - Ground/Roof/Projecting Signs each $236.69 $378.70 $615 Monumental Sign each $615.39 $378.70 $994 Subdivision Directional Sign each $236.69 $378.70 $615 Wall/Awning Sign, Non-Electric each $284.03 $189.35 $473 Wall, Electric each $284.03 $189.35 $473 Pole Sign each $426.04 $378.70 $805 Skylight Less than 10 sf first skylight $284.03 $189.35 $473 Less than 10 sf each add'l skylight $0.00 $47.34 $47 Greater than 10 sf each $378.70 $189.35 $568 Greater than 10 sf each add'j skylight $0.00 $47.34 $47 Spa or Hol Tub (Pre-fabricated) each $331.36 $189.35 $521 Stairs - FJrst Flight first flight $378.70 $189.35 $568 Each additional flight per flight $94.68 $94.68 $189 Storage Racks 0-8' high (up to 100 If) first 100 If $710.06 $189.35 $899 each addJtional1 00 If each 100 If $47.34 $47.34 $95 over 8' high (up to 100 If) first 100 If $804.74 $284.03 $1,089 each addJtlonal1 00 If each 100 If $47.34 $47.34 $95 Swimming Pool/Spa (Master Plan) Vinyl-lined each $284.03 $473.38 $757 Fiberglass each $284.03 $473.38 $757 Gunite each $378.70 $662.73 $1,041 Commercial pool (up to 800 sO each $710.06 $852.08 $1.562 Commercial pool (over 800 sf) each $804.74 $1,136.10 $1,941 Window or Sliding Glass Door Repair/Replace up to 10 $378.70 $284.03 $663 Add'l Repair/Replace each add'l 5 $47.34 $47.34 $95 New window (structural) each $378.70 $189.35 $568 Add'l New window (structural) each $47.34 $47.34 $95 Product Review per hour $189.35 $0.00 $189 Disabled Access Compliance Inspectlon per hour $0.00 $189.35 $189 C) I ~ C) m MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 4 of 5 Annual Volume Average (# of Units) Current Fee 2 $ 290 $ 12 $ 278 101 $ 337 14 $ 400 - 7 $ 1,123 1 $ 343 6 $ 544 300 $ 627 0 4 $ 1,985 1 $ 273 Potential Current Revenue @ Actual Annual Surplus! Current Fee Coat (Subsidy) $ . $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ . $ - $ - $ 580 $ 1,231 $ (651) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 3.340 $ 5.681 $ ~ $ 34,085 $ 47,811 $ (13,725) $ 5,600 $ 11,266 $ (5,66~1 $ . $ . $ - $ - $ - $ $ . $ . $ - $ $ . $ . $ . $ . $ . $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ . $ . $ . $ - $ - $ . $ . $ . $ . $ 7,864 $ 7.621 $ 243 $ . $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 343 $ 757 $ 1415 $ 3,263 $ 4,544 $ 11.282 $ 188,100 $ 312.428 $ (124,328) $ - $ . $ . $ 7,940 $ 7,763 $ 176 $ . $ - $ - $ 273 $ 663 $ (390) $ - $ - $ . $ - $ - $ - $ . $ . $ - $ . $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ . $ . $ 1/18/07 -1:17 PM City of Chula Vista POTENTIAL FEE SCHEDULE FOR MISCELLANEOUS ITEMS Planning & Building Department-Building Division ~ Intake and Plan Check Actual Inspection Total Actual Work Item Unit Cost Actual Cost Cosl Supplemental Plan Check fee (first 1/2 hour) each $142.01 $0.00 $142 Each Additional 112 hour (or portion thereof) per 1/2 hour $94.68 $0.00 $95 Supplemental Inspection fee (first 1/2 hour) each $47.34 $94.68 $142 Each Additional 112 hour (or portion thereof) per 1/2 hour $0.00 $94.68 $95 Emergency Call-Out (Non-Scheduled) 4 Hours $0.00 $757.40 $757 After Hours Call-Out (Scheduled) 2 Hours $0.00 $378.70 $379 Fire Damage Report Review each $189.35 $0.00 $189 Private Sewer, Waler, Storm Drains and/or Site lighting $0 to $50,000 each or % $1,278.11 $946.75 $2,225 $50,001 to $100,000 each or % $1,372.79 $2,272.20 $3,645 $100,001 to $250,000 each or % $1,562.14 $3,029.60 $4,592 $250,001 to $500,000 each or % $1,751.49 $3,787.00 $5,538 $500,001 to $1M each or % $2,082.85 $5,680.50 $7,763 >$1M each or % $2,272.20 $7,574.00 $9,B46 ANNUAUNON-FEE RELATED Mobile Home Park Permits - Fees set by state. annual $94,864.35 $110,675.0B $205,539 CIP Support annual $25,183.55 $39,290.13 $64,474 Re.Org Budgeted Staff Support to Comm Dell annual $11,007.88 $0.00 $11,008 Re-Org Budgeted Staff Support to Fire annual $11,007.86 $0.00 $11,00B Re.OrQ Budgeted Staff Support to Planning annual $165,117.93 $0.00 $165,118 Re-Org Budgeted Staff Support to Engineering annual $44,031.45 $0.00 $44,031 Potenllal Current Revenue @ Actual Annual Surplusl Currenl Fee Cost (Subsidy) $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ - $ $ - $ - $ - $ - $ 10,363 $ 33,373 $ (23,010) $ 10,140 $ 21,870 $ (11,7301 $ 15,288 $ 27,550 $ (12,262) $ - $ $ - $ 16,014 $ 15,527 $ 487 $ 19,406 $ 19,692 $ (286 $ $ - $ - $ 19,265 $ 205,539 $ (186,274) $ - $ 64,474 $ (64,474 $ - $ - $ - $ - Annual Volume Average (# of Units) Current Fee 15 $ 691 6 $ 1,690 6 $ 2,548 0 $ - 2 $ 8,007 2 $ 9,703 1 $ 19,265 1 1 1 1 1 C) I ~ C) -.,J Total Revenues: ~ $ 812,8361 $ 1,680,813 1 $ (867,976)1 MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 5 of 5 1/18/07 - 1:17 PM ~ C) I ~ C) 00 City of Chula Vista New Construction Fees FEE AND REVENUE COMPARISONS Current Annual Potential Current Class Occupancy Type Average SF Standard Actual Unit Current Surplusl Volume of Revenue at Actual Annual Revenue Subtotal Cost per SF Cost Fee (Subsidy) - Cost Surplusl Each Fee Activity Current fee (Subsidy) A-1 Theater 2.6822 2,000 $ 5,364 $ - $ 15,364 0 $ - $ - $ - - 1.0062 10,000 $ 10,062 $ - $ 110,062 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.7219 20,000 $ 14,438 $ - $ (14,438 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.4381 40,000 $ 17,524 $ - $ 117 524 0 $ - $ - $ - - 0.2581 100,000 $ 25,810 $ - $ 125810 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.1643 200,000 $ 32,860 $ - $ 132 860 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - A-2 Church 2.6220 2,000 $ 5244 $ - $ (5,244 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.9844 10,000 $ 9,844 $ - $ (9,844 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.7051 20,000 $ 14.102 $ - $ (14,102 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.4278 40,000 $ 17112 $ - $ (17,112 0 $ - $ - $ - - 0,2523 100,000 $ 25.230 $ - $ (25 230 0 $ - $ - $ - 0,1606 200.000 $ 32120 $ - $ 132120 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - A-2,1 Auditorium 2.6027 2,000 $ 5,205 $ - $ (5,205 0 $ - $ - $ - - 0,9765 10,000 $ 9.765 $ - $ (9.765 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.7004 20 000 $ 14,008 $ - $ 114008 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.4251 40,000 $ 17 004 $ - $ (17,004) 0 $ - $ - $ - - 0,2505 100,000 $ 25,050 $ - $ 125,050 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.1594 200,000 $ 31,880 $ - $ 131.880 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - A-2,1 Restaurant 8.1748 300 $ 2,452 $ - $ (2,452) 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 3.1131 1,500 $ 4,670 $ - $ (4,670 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 2.1681 3,000 $ 6,504 $ 3,090 $ (3,415 1 $ 3,090 $ 6,504 $ (3,415 - 1.3092 6.000 $ 7.855 $ - $ (7,855 0 $ - $ - $ - - 0,7884 15000 $ 11.826 $ 5731 $ 16,095 1 $ 5,731 $ 11826 $ 16.095 0.5018 30 000 $ 15054 $ - $ 15.054 0 $ - $ - $ - $ (9510 A-3 Small Assembly Buildings 7.5487 300 $ 2,265 $ - $ 12,265 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 2,8627 1.500 $ 4,294 $ 5,408 $ 1,114 1 $ 5,408 $ 4,294 $ 1,114 - - 2,0103 3000 $ 6,031 $ - $ 16.031 0 $ - $ - $ - - 1.2157 6,000 $ 7.294 $ 7.826 $ 532 1 $ 7,826 $ 7294 $ 532 - 0,7275 15,000 $ 10,913 $ - $ 110.913 0 $ - $ - $ - 0,4631 30,000 $ 13,893 $ - $ (13893 0 $ - $ - $ - $ 1646 B Banks 4.8341 500 $ 2,417 $ - $ 12,417 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 1,8274 2,500 $ 4,569 $ - $ (4,569) 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 1,2914 5,000 $ 6,457 $ - $ 16.457 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.7818 10.000 $ 7,818 $ - $ (7.818 0 $ - $ - $ - - 0.4657 25 000 $ 11,643 $ - $ 111643 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.2964 50.000 $ 14,820 $ - $ 114820 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - MAXIMUS, Inc, Page 1 of 11 1118/07 -1:12 PM ...... o I ...... o CD City of Chula Vista New Construction Fees FEE AND REVENUE COMPARISONS Current Annual Potential Current Class Occupancy Type Average SF Standard Actual Unit Current Surplusl Volume of Revenue at Actual Annual Revenue Subtotal Cost per SF Cost Fee (Subsidy) . Cost Surplus! Each Fee Activity Current Fee (Subsidy) B Laundromat 9.3420 200 $ 1,868 $ - $ {1,868\ 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 3.5397 1,000 $ 3,540 $ - $ {3,540 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 2.4900 2,000 $ 4,980 $ - $ 14980 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 1.5062 4000 $ 6,025 $ - $ 16,025 0 $ - $ - $ - - 0.9003 10,000 $ 9,003 $ - $ (9,003 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.5730 20,000 $ 11,460 $ - $ 111,460 0 $ - $ - $ - $ . 8 Medical Office 2.5464 2000 $ 5093 $ - $ 15,093 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.9533 10,000 $ 9,533 $ - $ 19,533 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.6867 20,000 $ 13,734 $ - $ 113,734 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.4170 40,000 $ 16,680 $ - $ (16,680 0 $ - $ - $ - - 0.2450 100,000 $ 24,500 $ - $ 124 500 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.1559 200,000 $ 31,180 $ - $ (31180 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 8 Offices 2.3953 2,000 $ 4,791 $ - $ (4,791 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.8994 10,000 $ 8,994 $ - $ (8,994 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.6441 20,000 $ 12,982 $ - $ (12882 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.3908 40,000 $ 15,632 $ - $ 115632 0 $ - $ - $ - - 0.2305 100,000 $ 23 050 $ - $ (23,050 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.1467 200,000 $ 29,340 $ - $ 129,340 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 8 High Rise Office Building 1.1346 15,000 $ 17,019 $ - $ 117 019 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.4428 75,000 $ 33,210 $ - $ 133,210 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.2935 150,000 $ 44,025 $ - $ 144,025 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.1757 300,000 $ 52,710 $ - $ (52,710 0 $ - $ - $ - - 0.1098 750,000 $ 82,350 $ - $ {82,350 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.0699 1 500 000 $ 104,850 $ - $ 1104850 0 $ - $ - $ - $ . 8 High Rise condo Building 1.1679 15,000 $ 17,519 $ - $ 117,519 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.4545 75,000 $ 34,088 $ - $ (34,088 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.3030 150000 $ 45,450 $ - $ {45,450 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.1815 300,000 $ 54,450 $ - $ {54 450 0 $ - $ - $ - - 0.1130 750 000 $ 84,750 $ - $ {84 750 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.0719 1,500 000 $ 107850 $ - $ 1107850 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - E-l PreschooUSchool 7.9172 300 $ 2375 $ - $ 12375 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 3.0075 1,500 $ 4511 $ - $ 4511 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 2.1049 3000 $ 6,315 $ - $ 18,315 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 1.2722 6,000 $ 7633 $ - $ {7633 0 $ - $ - $ - - 0.7633 15,000 $ 11,450 $ - $ (11450 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.4858 30,000 $ 14574 $ - $ 114 574 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - MAXIMUS, Inc, Page 2 of 11 1/18/07 -1:12 PM ..... o I ..... ..... o City of Chula Vista New Construction Fees FEE AND REVENUE COMPARISONS Current Annual Potential Current Class Occupancy Type Average SF Standard Actual Unit Current Surplusl Volume of Revenue at Actual Annual Revenue Subtotal Cost per SF Cost Fee (Subsidy) - Cost Surplusl Each Fee Activity Current Fee (Subsidy) E-2 Preschool/School 7.9172 300 $ 2,375 $ - $ (2,375 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 3.0075 1,500 $ 4,511 $ - $ (4,511 0 $ - $ - $ - 2.1049 3,000 $ 6,315 $ - $ 6,315 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 1.2722 6,000 $ 7633 $ - $ 7,633 0 $ - $ - $ - - 0.7633 15,000 $ 11,450 $ - $ (11450 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.4858 30,000 $ 14,574 $ - $ (14,574 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - E-3 Daycare 7.9172 300 $ 2,375 $ - $ (2375 0 $ - $ - $ - $ (4,511 . . - - 3.0075 1,500 $ 4,511 $ - 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 2.1049 3,000 $ 6,315 $ - $ (6315 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 1.2722 6,000 $ 7,633 $ - $ 7,633 0 $ - $ - $ - - 0.7633 15000 $ 11,450 $ - $ (11450 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.4858 30,000 $ 14,574 $ - $ (14,574 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - F-1 I ndustrial/Manufacturi ng 3.2326 1,000 $ 3,233 $ - $ (3,233 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 1.2181 5,000 $ 6,091 $ - $ (6,091 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.8663 10,000 $ a,663 $ - $ (8663 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.5250 20,000 $ 10,500 $ - $ (10,500 0 $ - $ - $ - - 0.3113 50,000 $ 15,565 $ - $ (15,565 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.1981 100000 $ 19,810 $ - $ (19810 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - F-2 Heavy Industrial 2.4828 2,000 $ 4966 $ - $ (4,966 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.9286 10,000 $ 9,286 $ - $ 19,286 0 $ - $ - $ - - 0.6701 20,000 $ 13,402 $ - $ (13,402 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.4071 40,000 $ 16,284 $ - $ (16,284 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.2388 100,000 $ 23,880 $ - $ (23 880 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.1520 200 000 $ 30,400 $ - $ (30 400 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - H-1 High Explosion Hazard 6.0267 500 $ 3,013 $ - $ (3,013 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 2.2461 2,500 $ 5615 $ - $ 15,615 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 1.6322 5,000 $ 8161 $ - $ 18161 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.9927 10,000 $ 9,927 $ - $ (9,927 0 $ - $ - $ - - 0.5794 25 000 $ 14,485 $ - $ (14,485 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.3689 50,000 $ 18,445 $ - $ 118,445 0 $ - $ - $ - $ . H-2 Moderate Explosion Hazard 3.4291 1,000 $ 3,429 $ - $ (3429 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 1.2929 5,000 $ 6,465 $ - $ 16,465 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.9183 10,000 $ 9183 $ - $ (9,183 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.5564 20,000 $ 11,128 $ - $ (11,128 0 $ - $ - $ - - 0.3302 50,000 $ 16,510 $ - $ (16510 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.2102 100,000 $ 21020 $ - $ 121,020 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 3 of 11 1/18/07 -1:12 PM ~ C) I ~ ~ ~ City of Chula Vista New Construction Fees FEE AND REVENUE COMPARISONS Current Annual Potential Current Class Occupancy Type Average SF Standard Actual Unit Current Surplus! Volume of Revenue at Actual Annual Revenue Subtotal Cost per SF Cost Fee (Subsidy) - Cost Surplusl Each Fee Activity Current Fee ISubsldv\ H-3 High Fire Hazard 3.4623 1,000 $ 3.462 $ - $ 13,462 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 1.3047 5,000 $ 6,524 $ - $ 16,524 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.9278 10 000 $ 9,278 $ - $ 19,278 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.5623 20,000 $ 11,248 $ - $ 111,248 0 $ - $ - $ - - 0.3334 50,000 $ 18,670 $ - $ 116,670 0 $ - S - S - 0.2122 100,000 $ 21220 S - $ 121 220 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - H-4 Repair Garage 8.2142 300 $ 2,464 $ - $ 12,484 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 3.0978 1500 $ 4,646 $ - $ 14,646 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 2.1996 3,000 $ 6,599 $ - $ 16,599 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 1.3327 6,000 $ 7,996 $ - $ 17,996 0 $ - S - S - - 0.7911 15000 $ 11,867 $ - $ 111867 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.5035 30,000 $ 15105 $ - S 115,105 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - H-5 Aircraft Hanger/Repairs 2.5757 1,000 $ 2,576 S - $ 12,576 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.9488 5,000 $ 4,744 $ - S 14,744 0 $ - S - $ - - - 0.7053 10,000 $ 7053 $ - $ 17,053 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.4305 20,000 $ 8,610 $ - $ 18610 0 $ - S - $ - - 0.2472 50,000 $ 12,360 $ - $ 112,360 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.1574 100000 $ 15,740 $ - $ 115,740 0 S - $ - $ - S - H-6 Semiconductor Fabrication 3.4012 1000 $ 3401 $ - $ 13.401 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 1.2853 5000 $ 6,427 $ - $ 16,427 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.9089 10,000 $ 9,089 $ - $ 19089 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.5503 20,000 $ 11,006 $ - $ 111,006 0 $ - $ - $ - - 0.3276 50,000 $ 16380 $ - $ 16,380 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.2085 100,000 $ 20 850 $ - $ 20 850 0 $ - $ - S - $ - H-7 Health Hazard Materials 5.8420 500 $ 2,921 $ - $ 12,921 0 S - $ - $ - - - 2.2008 2,500 S 5,502 S - S 15,502 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 1.5659 5000 $ 7,830 $ - $ 17,830 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.9491 10,000 $ 9,491 $ - $ 19,491 0 $ - $ - $ - - 0.5625 25,000 $ 14063 $ - S 114,063 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.3581 50,000 $ 17,905 $ - $ 117 905 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 1-1.1 Nursery - Full-Time (5+) 10.9736 200 $ 2,195 $ - $ 12,195 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 4.1707 1000 $ 4,171 $ - $ 14,171 0 S - $ - $ - - - 2.9160 2,000 $ 5,832 $ - S 15,832 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 1.7621 4,000 $ 7,048 $ - $ 17,048 0 $ - $ - $ - - 1.0580 10,000 $ 10,580 $ - $ 110,580 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.6734 20 ODD $ 13468 $ - $ 113,468 0 S - $ - $ - S - MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 4 of 11 1/18/07 - 1:12 PM ~ o I ~ ~ N City of Chula Vista New Construction Fees FEE AND REVENUE COMPARISONS Current Annual Potential Current Average Actual Unit Current SurplusJ Actual Annual Revenue Class Occupancy Type eOtal per SF SF Standard Cost Fee (Subsidy) - Volume of Revenue at Cost Surplusl Subtotal Each Fee Activity Current Fee (Subsidy) 1-'.2 Health Care Centers 5.7901 500 $ 2,895 $ - $ 12,895 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 2.1803 2,500 $ 5,451 $ - $ (5,451 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 1.5527 5000 $ 7,764 $ - $ 17764 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.9412 10000 $ 9.412 $ - $ 19412 0 $ - $ - $ - - 0.5575 25,000 $ 13,938 $ - $ 13,938 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.3549 50,000 $ 17,745 $ - $ 17,745 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 1-2 Nursing Home/Assisted Living 11.0550 250 $ 2,764 $ - $ (2764 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 4.1399 1,250 $ 5175 $ - $ (5,175) 0 $ - $ ---- - $ - - - 2.9804 2,500 $ 7,451 $ - $ 17,451 0 $ - $ - $ - - - - 1.8098 5,000 $ 9,049 $ - $ 19,049 0 $ - $ - $ - - 1.0636 12,500 $ 13,295 $ - $ 13,295 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.6770 25,000 $ 16,925 $ - $ <16,925 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 1-3 Mental Hospital/Jail 2.7394 2,500 $ 6,849 $ - $ (6,849 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 1.0418 12,500 $ 13,023 $ - $ 113,023 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.7275 25,000 $ 18188 $ - $ 118188 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.4395 50 000 $ 21,975 $ - $ 121,975 0 $ - $ - $ - - 0.2641 125,000 $ 33,013 $ - $ 133,013 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.1681 250,000 $ 42,025 $ - $ 142,025 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - M Stores (Retail) 2.0182 2,500 $ 5,045 $ 4,213 $ 1832 2 $ 8,427 $ 10,091 $ (1,664 - - 0.7542 12,500 $ 9,428 $ 9,267 $ 1160 2 $ 18,534 $ 18,855 $ (321 - - 0.5452 25,000 $ 13,630 $ 14,912 $ 1,282 2 $ 29,824 $ 27,260 $ 2,564 - - 0.3313 50,000 $ 16,565 $ 25,312 $ 8,747 1 $ 25,312 $ 16,565 $ 8,747 0.1941 125000 $ 24,263 $ - $ 124,263 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.1236 250 000 $ 30,900 $ - $ 130,900 0 $ - $ - $ - $ 9325 M Market 2.0182 2,500 $ 5,046 $ - $ 15,046 0 $ - $ - $ - - 0.7542 12,500 $ 9,428 $ - $ 19,428 0 $ - $ - $ - - 0.5452 25,000 $ 13,630 $ - $ 113,630 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.3313 50,000 $ 16,565 $ - $ 116,565 0 $ - $ - $ - - 0.1941 125,000 $ 24 263 $ - $ 124 263 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.1236 250,000 $ 30,900 $ - $ 130,900 0 $ - $ - $ - $ . R-l Apartment Bldg 5.3812 800 $ 4,305 $ - $ (4305 0 $ - $ - - $ - - 2.0508 4000 $ B 203 $ 5,744 $ 12,459 2 $ 11488 $ 16,406 $ (4,91~1 - - 1.4260 8,000 $ 11,408 $ 9,457 $ <1,951 2 $ 18,915 $ 22,816 $ (3,901 - - 0.8609 16,000 $ 13,774 $ 11,905 $ 11870 4 $ 47,618 $ 55,098 $ (7,480) - 0.5190 40,000 $ 20 760 $ - $ (20 760 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.3303 80 000 $ 26,424 $ - $ 126,424 0 $ - $ - $ - $ (16300 MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 5 of 11 1/18/07 - 1 :12 PM ~ C) I ~ ~ c.> City of Chula Vista New Construction Fees FEE AND REVENUE COMPARISONS Current Annual Potential Current Class Occupancy Type Average SF Standard Actual Unit Current Surplusl Volume of Revenue at Actual Annual Revenue Subtotal Cost per SF Cost Fee (Subsidy) - Cost l~urPI~~, Each Fee Activity Current Fee Subsld R-1 Apartment Bldg - Repeat Unit 2.4240 800 $ 1,939 $ 1,791 $ {148 60 $ 107,445 $ 116,352 $ 18,907 - 0.8616 4,000 $ 3,446 $ 2,406 $ 11,040 51 $ 122,706 $ 175,766 $ 153,060 - - 0.6854 8,000 $ 5483 $ 3,757 $ 11,726 24 $ 90,169 $ 131,597 $ 141,428 - - 0.4228 16,000 $ 6,765 $ 4,974 $ {1791 13 $ 64,661 $ 87942 $ 123,281 0.2315 40,000 $ 9,260 $ - $ 19,260 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.1475 80,000 $ 11,800 $ - $ 111,800 0 $ - $ - $ - $ {126677 R-1 Hotels & Motels 1.2851 5,000 $ 6,426 $ - $ {6,426 0 $ - $ - $ - - 0.4798 25,000 $ 11,995 $ - $ 111,995 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.3475 50,000 $ 17,375 $ - $ 117,375 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.2112 100,000 $ 21,120 $ - $ 21120 0 $ - $ - $ - - 0.1236 250,000 $ 30 900 $ - $ 30,900 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.0787 500 000 $ 39,350 $ - $ 139 350 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - R.1 Hotels & Motels - Phased Permits 1.4358 5,000 $ 7,179 $ - $ 17,179 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.5416 25,000 $ 13,540 $ - $ 113,540 0 $ - $ - $ - - 0.3844 50,000 $ 19,220 $ . $ 119220 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.2329 100,000 $ 23,290 $ - $ 123,290 0 $ - $ - $ - - 0.1383 250,000 $ 34,575 $ - $ {34,575 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.OB80 500,000 $ 44,000 $ - $ 144,000 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - R-3 Dwellings - Custom 2.5247 1,500 $ 3787 $ 1,481 $ 12,306 31 $ 45,906 $ 117399 $ 171,492 - - 1.6284 2,500 $ 4,071 $ 2610 $ 11,461 7 $ 18,273 $ 28,497 $ 110,224 - - 1.4337 3,500 $ 5,018 $ 4,509 $ {509 4 $ 18,036 $ 20,072 $ {2,036 - - 1.1740 5,000 $ 5,870 $ 4,832 $ {1038 2 $ 9,664 $ 11,740 $ 12,076 - 0.8817 8000 $ 7,054 $ 6,378 $ 1676 11 $ 70,158 $ 77,590 $ 17,432 0.6280 15000 $ 9420 $ 7,525 $ 11895 1 $ 7525 $ 9,420 $ {1,895 $ 195155 R-3 Dwellings - Model 2.8087 1,500 $ 4,213 $ - $ 14,213 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 1.8746 2,500 $ 4,687 $ - $ 14,687 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 1.5013 3,500 $ 5255 $ 3798 $ 11,457 7 $ 26,586 $ 36,782 $ 110196 - - 1.2213 5,000 $ 6,107 $ 4692 $ {1,415 16 $ 75,072 $ 97 704 $ 122 632 - 0.8876 8,000 $ 7,101 $ 5,790 $ 1,311 4 $ 23,160 $ 28,403 $ 15,243 0.6154 15,000 $ 9,231 $ - $ 19,231 0 $ - $ - $ - $ /38,071 R-3 Dwellings - Production Phase 1.3450 1500 $ 2018 $ 1,188 $ 1830 398 $ 472 728 $ 802,965 $ 1330,237 - of Mastef Plan 0.9036 2,500 $ 2,259 $ 1,468 $ 1791 377 $ 553,477 $ 851,643 $ '298 166 (repeats) 0.7374 3,500 $ 2,581 $ 1,864 $ (716 169 $ 315,094 $ 436,172 $ 1121,078 - - 0.6227 5,000 $ 3,114 $ 2366 $ 1748 15 $ 35 489 $ 46,703 $ 111,214 - 0.4747 8000 $ 3,798 $ - $ {3798 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.3289 15000 $ 4934 $ - $ 14934 0 $ - $ - $ - $ 1760 694 MAXIMUS, Inc, Page 6 of 11 1/18/07 -1:12 PM ~ C) I ~ ~ .j:oo City of Chula Vista New Construction Fees FEE AND REVENUE COMPARISONS Current Annual Potential Current Class Occupancy Type Average SF Standard Actual Unit Current Surplusl Volume of Revenue at Actual Annual Revenue Subtotal Cost per SF Gost Fee (Subsidy) - Cost Surplusl Each Fee Activity Current fee (Subsidy) R-3 Dwellings - Alternate Materials 2.8907 1,500 $ 4,336 $ - $ 4,336 0 $ - $ - $ - - 2.0109 2,500 $ 5,027 $ - $ 5,027 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 1.5824 3,500 $ 5,538 $ - $ (5,538 0 $ - $ - $ - - 1.2904 5000 $ 6,452 $ - $ (6,452 0 $ - $ - $ - 1.0237 8,000 $ 8,190 $ - $ (8,190 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.6558 15,000 $ 9.837 $ - $ {9,837 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - R-2.1, Group Care, Non-Amb. (6+) 2.4871 2,000 $ 4,974 $ - $ /4974 0 $ - $ - $ - 2.3 & 6 - 0.9324 10,000 $ 9,324 $ - $ {9,324 0 $ - $ - $ - - 0.6698 20,000 $ 13,396 $ - $ /13,396 0 $ - $ - $ - - 004066 40,000 $ 16,264 $ - $ (16,264 0 $ - $ - $ - - 0.2393 100,000 $ 23 930 $ - $ (23,930 0 $ - $ - $ 0.1523 200,000 $ 30 460 $ - $ (30 460 0 $ - $ - $ - $ . R-2.2 , Group Care. Ambulatory (6+) 204871 2,000 $ 4974 $ - $ (4,974 0 $ - $ - $ - 6.20 0.9324 10,000 $ 9,324 $ - $ (9,324 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.6698 20 000 $ 13396 $ - $ (13,396 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 004066 40,000 $ 16,264 $ - $ (16,264 0 $ - $ - $ - - 0.2393 100,000 $ 23 930 $ - $ /23,930 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.1523 200 000 $ 30 460 $ - $ (30,460 0 $ - $ - $ - $ . R-2.1.1 Group Care. Non-Amb. (1-5) 9.6608 200 $ 1,932 $ - $ (1,932 0 $ - $ - $ - 2.3.1 & - 3.6192 1,000 $ 3,619 $ - $ (3619 0 $ - $ - $ - 6.1.1 - 2.6036 2,000 $ 5,207 $ - $ (5,207 0 $ - $ - '$ - - - 1.5808 4,000 $ 6,323 $ - $ (6,323 0 $ - $ - $ - - 0.9295 10,000 $ 9,295 $ - $ (9,295 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.5917 20 000 $ 11834 $ - $ /11834 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - R-2.2.1 Group Care, Amb. (1-5) 9.6608 200 $ 1,932 $ - $ 1.932 0 $ - $ - $ - 6.2.1 - 3.6192 1,000 $ 3,619 $ - $ (3,619 0 $ - $ - $ - - 2.6036 2,000 $ 5,207 $ - $ (5207 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 1.5806 4,000 $ 6,323 $ - $ (6,323 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.9295 10000 $ 9,295 $ - $ (9,295 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.5917 20 000 $ 11,834 $ - $ (11,834 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 5-1 Moderate Hazard Storage 304850 1,000 $ 3,485 $ - $ (3465 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 1.3136 5,000 $ 6.569 $ - $ (6,569 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.9335 10,000 $ 9,335 $ - $ 9,335 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.5656 20,000 $ 11,312 $ - $ (11,312) 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.3356 50 000 $ 16780 $ - $ (16,760) 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.2136 100000 $ 21360 $ - $ (21,360 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 7 of 11 1/18/07 -1:12 PM ~ C) I ~ ~ en City of Chula Vista New Construction Fees FEE AND REVENUE COMPARISONS Current Annual Potential Current Class Occupancy Type Average SF Standard Actual Unit Current Surplusl Volume of Revenue at Actual Annual Revenue Subtotal Cost per SF Cost Fee (Subsidy) - Cost Surplus! Each Fee Activity Current Fee (Subsidy) 5-1 Self Storage 2.0223 2.000 $ 4.045 $ - $ (4045 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.7551 10.000 $ 7.551 $ - $ (7.551 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.5467 20 000 $ 10.934 $ - $ 110.934 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.3323 40.000 $ 13.292 $ - $ 113.292 0 $ - $ - $ - - 0.1945 100.000 $ 19.450 $ - $ 119.450 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.1238 200 000 $ 24.760 $ - $ 124.760 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 5-2 Low Hazard Storage 3.3849 1000 $ 3.385 $ - $ 13385 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 1.2674 5.000 $ 6.337 $ - $ 16.337 0 $ - $ - $ - - 0.9127 10.000 $ 9.127 $ - $ 19.127 0 $ - $ - $ - - 0.5542 20.000 $ 11.084 $ - $ 111.084 0 $ - $ - $ - - 0.3257 50 000 $ 16.285 $ - $ 116.285 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.2073 100000 $ 20 730 $ - $ (20 730 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 5-3 Repair Garage 3.3649 1.000 $ 3.365 $ 1.305 $ 12.080 1 $ 1.305 $ 3.385 $ 12.080 - (nol H-4) 1.2674 5.000 $ 6.337 $ - $ 16337 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.9127 10000 $ 9.127 $ 4464 $ (4.663 1 $ 4464 $ 9.127 $ (4.663) - - 0.5542 20 000 $ 11.084 $ - $ (11.084 0 $ - $ - $ - - 0.3257 50.000 $ 16.285 $ - $ (16.285 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.2073 100000 $ 20.730 $ - $ 120 730 0 $ - $ - $ - $ 16.743 5-3 Fuel Dispensing Canopy 9.8969 100 $ 990 $ - $ 990 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 3.8679 500 $ 1934 $ - $ 11.934 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 2.5562 1.000 $ 2.556 $ - $ 12.556 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 1.5294 2.000 $ 3.059 $ - $ 13.059 0 $ - $ - $ - - 0.9580 5.000 $ 4790 $ - $ 14790 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.6096 10000 $ 8096 $ - $ 16.096 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 5-3 Parking Garage 4.3980 1.000 $ 4.396 $ - $ 14.396 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 1.6309 5.000 $ 8.155 $ - $ 18155 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 1.1957 10.000 $ 11.957 $ - $ (11 957 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.7283 20.000 $ 14566 $ - $ 114.566) 0 $ - $ - $ - - 0.4224 50 000 $ 21120 $ - $ 121.120 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.2689 100000 $ 26.890 $ - $ 126 890 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 5-4 Open Parking Garage 4.2762 1000 $ 4.276 $ - $ 14276 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 1.5886 5.000 $ 7,943 $ - $ 17943 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 1.1617 10000 $ 11617 $ - $ 111.617 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.7072 20.000 $ 14.144 $ - $ (14.144 0 $ - $ - $ - - 0.4109 50.000 $ 20 545 $ - $ (20.545 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.2616 100.000 $ 26.160 $ - $ 26160 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 8 0111 1/18/07 -1:12 PM ~ C) I ~ ~ m City of Chula Vista New Construction Fees FEE AND REVENUE COMPARISONS Current Annual Potential Current Class Occupancy Type Average SF Standard Actual Unit Current SurplusJ Volume of Revenue at Actual Annual Revenue Subtotal Cost per SF Cost Fee (Subsidy) - Cost Surplusl Each Fee Activity Current Fee (Subsldv) 8-5 Aircraft Hanger & Helistops 5.1196 500 $ 2,560 $ - $ 12.560 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 1.8951 2,500 $ 4.738 $ - $ 14,738 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 1.3955 5.000 $ 6.978 $ - $ 16978 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.8505 10 000 $ 8.505 $ - $ 8.505 0 $ - $ - $ - - 0.4917 25,000 $ 12.293 $ - $ 112.293 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.3131 50.000 $ 15.655 $ - $ 115.655 0 $ - $ - $ - $ . U-1 Private Garages/Accessory Buildings 9.0168 100 $ 902 $ - $ 1902 0 $ - $ - $ - - (also need to add a repeat category) 3.4690 500 $ 1,735 $ - $ 11735 0 $ - $ - $ - - 2.3669 1.000 $ 2.367 $ - $ 12.367 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 1.4242 2.000 $ 2.848 $ - $ 12.848 0 $ - $ - $ - - 0.8708 5.000 $ 4.354 $ - $ 14.354 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.5542 10.000 $ 5,542 $ - $ 15.542 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - 1-2 Convalescent Hospital 10.8239 200 $ 2,165 $ - $ 12.165 0 $ - $ - $ - - 4.1179 1.000 $ 4.118 $ - $ 14.118 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 2.8734 2.000 $ 5,747 $ - $ 5,747 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 1.7357 4,000 $ 6.943 $ - $ 6.943 0 $ - $ - $ - - 1.0437 10,000 $ 10.437 $ - $ 110,437 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.6643 20,000 $ 13.286 $ - $ 113.286 0 $ - $ - $ - $ - A Restaurant TI 5.9378 300 $ 1.781 $ 343 $ 11.439 1 $ 343 $ 1,781 $ 11439 - - 2.2794 1.500 $ 3419 $ 1,477 $ 11.942 7 $ 10.337 $ 23.934 $ 113.597 - - 1.5621 3,000 $ 4.686 $ 3,423 $ 11.264 2 $ 6.845 $ 9.373 $ 12.527 - - 0.9407 6.000 $ 5.644 $ 5.008 $ (637 1 $ 5.008 $ 5.644 $ ll;37 - 0.5733 15.000 $ 8.600 $ - $ 8.600 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.3648 30 000 $ 10.944 $ - $ 110.944 0 $ - $ - $ - $ 118200 B Office Tenant Improvement 5.1453 300 $ 1,544 $ 351 $ 1.193 24 $ 8.412 $ 37 046 $ 128.634 1.9703 1.500 $ 2.955 $ 865 $ 12.090 g4 $ 46,723 $ 159.594 $ (112.871) - - 1.3570 3,000 $ 4.071 $ 1.665 $ 12,406 96 $ 159 825 $ 390816 $ 1230.991 - - 0.8179 6.000 $ 4.907 $ 3.950 $ 1957 5 $ 19751 $ 24.537 $ 14,786 - 0.4966 15.000 $ 7449 $ - $ 17,449 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.3160 3D 000 $ 9,480 $ - $ 19,480 0 $ - $ - $ - $ '377,282 B Medical Office Tenant Improvement 5.4584 300 $ 1,638 $ 460 $ (1.178) 7 $ 3,218 $ 11,463 $ 8,244 - 2.0955 1.500 $ 3.143 $ 1593 $ 11.550 2 $ 3.186 $ 6287 $ 13.101 - - 1.4359 3.000 $ 4,308 $ 1.931 $ 12.377 6 $ 11.585 $ 25,846 $ 114261 - - 0.8647 6000 $ 5,188 $ 2.774 $ 12,415 - 4 $ 11.095 $ 20.753 $ 19.658 - 0.5270 15.000 $ 7.905 $ - $ (7.905) 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.3354 30.000 $ 10.062 $ - $ 110062 0 $ - $ - $ - $ 135.264 MAXIMUS, Inc. Page 9 of 11 1/18/07 -1:12 PM ~ o I ~ ~ -J City of Chula Vista New Construction Fees FEE AND REVENUE COMPARISONS Current Annual Potential Current Class Occupancy Type Average SF Standard Actual Unit Current Surplusl Volume of Revenue at Actual Annual Revenue Subtotal Cost per SF Cost Fee (Subsidy) - Cost (~urplusl Each Fee Activity Current Fee SUbsldv) E AIIETI 5.5496 300 $ 1,665 $ 2366 $ 703 1 $ 2,368 $ 1,665 $ 703 - - 2.1424 1,500 $ 3,214 $ - $ 13,214 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 1.4517 3000 $ 4,355 $ - $ (4,355 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.8724 6,000 $ 5,234 $ - $ 15,234 0 $ - $ - $ - - 0.5363 15,000 $ 8,045 $ - $ 18,045 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.3412 30,000 $ 10,236 $ - $ /10,236 0 $ - $ - $ - $ 703 I I Occupancy TI 5.8072 300 $ 1,742 $ - $ /1,742 0 $ - $ - $ - - 2.2480 1500 $ 3,372 $ - $ 13,372 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 1.5148 3,000 $ 4,544 $ 2.498 $ 12,046 1 $ 2,498 $ 4,544 $ (2,046) - - 0.9095 6,000 $ 5,457 $ - $ 15,457 0 $ - $ - $ - - 0.5614 15,000 $ 8,421 $ - $ 18421 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.3572 30,000 $ 10716 $ - $ /10,716 0 $ - $ - $ - $ 12046 H Hazardous Occupancy Tl 5.9736 300 $ 1,792 $ 763 $ /1,030 1 $ 763 $ 1,792 $ 11,030 - 2.3068 1,500 $ 3460 $ - $ /3,460 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 1.5621 3000 $ 4,686 $ - $ 14688 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 0.9387 6,000 $ 5632 $ - $ 15,632 0 $ - $ - $ - - 0.5772 15,000 $ 8,658 $ - $ 18,658 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.3673 30,000 $ 11,019 $ - $ 111,019 0 $ - $ - $ - $ 11030 M RetailTJ 5.3474 300 $ 1604 $ - $ 11604 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 2.0564 1,500 $ 3085 $ 788 $ 12,297 11 $ 8,667 $ 33931 $ 125,264 - - 1.4043 3,000 $ 4,213 $ 1,340 $ 2,873 3 $ 4,020 $ 12,639 $ 18,619 - 0.8452 6000 $ 5,071 $ 2,888 $ 2,183 3 $ 8,664 $ 15,214 $ 16,549 - 0.5164 15,000 $ 7,746 $ 5248 $ 2,499 1 $ 5,248 $ 7,746 $ /2,499 0.3286 30 000 $ 9,858 $ 7809 $ 2,049 2 $ 15,617 $ 19716 $ /4099 $ (47029 - All Other TI (not listed above) 5.9020 300 $ 1,771 $ 290 $ 1,481 1 $ 290 $ 1771 $ 11481 - - 2.2521 1,500 $ 3,378 $ 944 $ 2.434 5 $ 4,721 $ 16,891 $ 112,170 - - 1.5621 3000 $ 4686 $ 3,354 $ /1332 1 $ 3354 $ 4,686 $ /1,332 - - 0.9427 6,000 $ 5656 $ 2,596 $ 13,061 2 $ 5,191 $ 11,312 $ 16,121 - 0.5693 15,000 $ 8540 $ - $ 18540 0 $ - $ - $ - 0.3624 30,000 $ 10,872 $ - $ 110,872 0 $ - $ - $ - $ /21,104 MAXIM US, Inc, Page 10 of 11 1/16/07 -1:12 PM ~ o I ~ ~ 00 City of Chula Vista New Construction Fees FEE AND REVENUE COMPARISONS Current Annual Potential Current Class Occupancy Type Average SF Standard Actual Unit Current Surplusl Volume of Revenue at Actual Annual Revenue Subtotal Cost per SF Cost Fee (Subsidy) - Cost Surplusl Each fee Activity Current Fee (Subsidy) I SHELL BUILDINGS - All Shell Buildings 2.9782 1,000 $ 2,978 $ - $ (2,978) 0 $ - $ - $ - - - 1.1195 5,000 $ 5598 $ 7,115 $ 1,517 8 $ 56,917 $ 44,780 $ 12137 - - 0.8000 10,000 $ 8,000 $ 6,979 $ (1,021 15 $ 104.684 $ 120,000 $ 115,316 - - 0.4852 20,000 $ 9,704 $ 10,796 - $ 1,092 9 $ 97,167 $ 87,336 $ 9,831 0.2867 50,000 $ 14,335 $ 15,616 $ 1,281 1 $ 15,616 $ 14,335 $ 1281 0.1825 100 000 $ 18,250 $ - $ 118250 0 $ - $ - $ - $ 7932 Potential Current Revenue at Actual Annual Revenue Current Fee Cost Surplus/(Subsid y) $ 2866199 $ 4401 698 $ (1 535499 MAXIM US, Inc. Page 11 Df 11 1/18/07 -1:12 PM CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ~f:. C1lY Of ~ -<: ~ (HULA VISTA January 23, 2007 Item~ SUBMITTED BY: PUBLIC HE.t\RING: CONSIDERATION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE LmRARY'S MASTER FEE SCHEDULE. RESOLUTION APROYING CHANGES TO THE LmRARY MASTER FEE SCHEDULE DAVID P AtMER, A~I~T CITY MAN. A-GER/ LIBRARY DIRECTOR V OV // JIM THOMSON, INTERIM CITY MANAGER Ji ITEM TITLE: REVIEWED BY: 4/5THS VOTE: YES X NO BACKGROUND As a result of the Library's growing eIhphasis on Local History and increasing demand by the public for historic photographs and documents, the Library recommends a change to its Master Fee Schedule. (ATTACHMENT A) ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed actlVlty for compliance with the California Envirommental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that there is no possibility that the activity in question may have a significant effect on the environment; therefore, pursuant to Section l5061(b)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines the activity is not subject to CEQA. Thus, no environmental review is necessary. RECOMMENDATION That Council adopt the resolution approving the proposed changes to the Library Master Fee Schedule. BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOM1\1lENDATION At their meeting of Oct. 18, 2006, the Library Board of Trustees voted to support this change to the Library Master Fee Schedule. (ATTACHMENT B) 11-1 January 23,2007, Item--.lL Page 2 of5 DISCUSSION The Chula Vista Public Library has an extensive Local History Collection, which includes historic photographs and negatives, documents, newspapers, books, maps and other items relating to the heritage of the community. After the Library Department identified Local History as one of its major areas of emphasis in its five-year Strategic Plan, the department began to devote more resources to its Local History Collection. In 2003-2004, the Library hired History Associates Incorporated to complete an assessment of the Local History Collection. The Assessment included numerous recommendations pertaining to preservation, management and storage of the materials, which are now being implemented by the Library. In addition, the Library has seen an increased demand from the public for photographic reproductions and assistance with historical research, which incurs costs for supplies and staff. Many libraries and historical societies that have historic photographs and archived collections have instituted fees to assist in partially recovering these costs. The Library contacted a number of other organizations that charge photographic and research fees including the San Diego Historical Society, the Oceanside Public Library, the Carlsbad Public Library, National City Public Library and several others outside the county. In developing its proposed fee schedule, the Chula Vista Public Library selected fees that were comparable to or less than the fees charged by other organizations in the county. The Library Department's Local History Historic Photograph fees include the following changes to the Master Fee Schedule: ~ Add Revroduction Fees- A third party vendor is used to make a negative or any photographic prints since the Library does not own the necessary equipment. The client will be charged the actual cost of the service. ~ Add Use Fees- A use fee is charged for each image reproduced for commercial or display purposes. These can include: photographs for commercial office display, editorial usage, advertising including print and tv. Photographs for display: Fee is per image Commercial (for profit): $100 Personal use (home display only) and Non-profit $75 Editorial usage (Content that is part of a news presentation for example books. newspapers. magazines. web sites): Fee is per image Commercial (for profit) $50 Non-profit $20 Promotional/marketing usage (Materials that benefit an organization bv generating exposure through items postcards. posters.): Fee is per image. Commercial (for profit) Non-profit such as calendars. brochures. $100 $50 11-2 January 23, 2007, Item4- Page 3 of5 Advertising usage (A paid presentation bv an identified sponsor including print and TV advertisements.): Fee is per image. Commercial (for profit) Non-profit $150 $75 ~ Add Other Fees- This includes photocopying fee and.obituary research fee. Photocopies made by staff /per page Obituaries $ .25 $5.00 Fees for editorial usage are lower because the Library wants to encourage such usage, which is highly beneficial to the City and its image. Re- F onnat of Master Fee Schedule Fee lEntries Staff recommends that the Library Master Fee Schedule be re-formatted to incorporate current recommended changes. The recommended changes are highlighted in Attachment "A." DECISION MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site specific and consequently the 500 foot rule found in California Code of Regulations section 18704.2(a)(1) is not applicable to this decision. FISCAL IMPACT It is estimated that these changes in the Library Master Fee Schedule will result in an increase of approximately $1,500 over the previous Fiscal Year. Prepared by: Mariya Anton, Senior Management Analyst, Library 11-3 January 23, 2007, Item j 1 Page 4 of5 Attachment "A" C$APTER V ! Library A. SERVICE FEES B. FINES 1. I Library Cards ! a. Resident card - J> charge , b. Replacement of Lost Card - $2.00 c. Additional Card. $2.00 [Resolution 2000-285, 08/15/00J I d. Non-California Rfesident Card - $20.00/yr I [Resolution 18356. effective 7/9/967 2. Audio Visual a. Insurance Charge - Video/DVD - $20/yr [Resolution 2003-320, effective 07/22/03J b. Video/DVD Insurance Charge Option - $l!item [Resolution 2003-320, effective 07/22/03 J Books a. Interlibrary Loan'- $5.00/item [Resolution 2003-320, effective 07/22/03J I b. Book Transfer Pdstage Fee - Actual cost of postage (request from non-Serra Library,) [Resolution 18356, effective 7/9/96J 3. 4. Lost Items a. $12.50 processing fee added to the retail price of any lost book or audio-visual item valued at $12.50 or more [Resolution2003-320. effective 7/22/037 1. Overdue Charges a. Books Adults $ .30 per day per item Children $ .10 per day per item b. Compact disc and audio cassettes - $ .30/day c. Video Tapes/DVDs $1.00 per day per item [Resolution 19567, effective 9/1/99J c) [Resolution 2003-320, effective 07/22/03 J 2. Audio-Visual a. Cassette Rewinding - $1.00 each 11-4 January 23, 2007, Item \ \ Page 5 of5 ='~""_~I':D'SJ;D- "€~~:- ."" ~. . .. !i!'liil\'i,",__~ ;T,~~:'-,'. ,-"-," .,",.', ,_II:L~ ' .- "~",-,, "":"';;",.;",,,,~ . ,,"c. ~1'~~',- '~' - ;;y,o;:""",~"'.'rz::>'1"-_,' ,', ""~~"',, ,"_' ,,";' '~~~ ~~~'"1fi~~~ fQ~jrffJI!ffBlf_BP~~1i__~~1_1I;~ 11-5 ~(~ . CHULA VISTA PUBLIC LIBRARY Attachment B DRAFT MINUTES liBRARY BOARD OF TRUSTEES OCTOBER 18,2006 4:00PM CIVIC CENTER LIBRARY CONFERENCE ROOM BOARD MEMBERS ABSENT: Ct-jAIR CRAFT, TRUSTE~S HARTMAN, & VALERIO VICE-CHAIR MARTINEZ &TRUSTEE PASQUA BOARD MEMBERS PRESENT: CITY STAFF PRESENT: LIBRARY DIRECTOR DA VID PALMER, ASSISTANT LIBRARY DliRECTOR PAULA BROWN, ARTS & CUL TUREfFuND DE;VELOPMENT MANAGER RODERICK REINHART, PUBLIC SERVICES MANAGER MAUREEN ROEBER, COMMUNITY RELATIONS MANAGER JERI GULBRANSEN AND SECRETARY ANNA GIULIANO, OTHERS PRESENT: JOAN ROSEMAN FROM FRIENDS OF THE LIBRARY I. CALL TO ORDER Board Chair Craft called the meeting to order at 4:05pm II. ApPROVAL OF MINUTES Motion was made (Hartman / Valerio) to approve the Minutes of the Wednesday, August 16, 2006 meeting. Motion was unanimously carried. III. CONTINUED MATTERS A. RANCHO DEL REY BRANCH PROJECT - PAULA BROWN Paula Brown advised that approxim<;ltely 90% of the constructions drawings were completed and they were due the following week. Brown went on to say there were no unforeseen difficulties and the project was moving forward. IV. NEW BUSINESS A. LOCAL HISTORY ROOM PHOTO FEES - JERI GULBRANSEN Jeri Gulbransen advised that with several recent requests for reproductions of historic photographs of the Chula Vista area a fee for said photos should be implemented and requested Board Members to endorse the fee schedule placed before them. A brief discussion regarding the number of photos requested during the last year (approximately 50) and the fact that the fee schedule was consistent with schedules implemented in National City, Carlsbad, Oceanside and the San Diego Historical Society took place. Motion was made to endorse the Chula Vista P4blic Library's Local History Collection Fee Schedule (HartmanNalerio) as put before the Board. Motion was unanimously carried. B. FY 07 / 08/ 09 BUDGET (PERFORMANCE MEASURES) - DAVID PALMER David Palmer advised that a Citizen's Survey was conducted by the Office of Budget & Analysis and questions asked indicated the Library System was in the area of good to 11-6 excellent overall. Chair Craft asked if questions were filtered as to East and West Chula Vista and he was told they were not. C. ARTS MASTER PLAN - RODERICK REINHART Rod Reinhart began his presentation by mentioning the Cultural Arts Commission approved the draft of the Arts Master Plan and he was seeking the Library Board's endorsement of recommendations in the plan that directly impacted the Library and Heritage Museum. The Executive Summary of the Arts Master Plan (entire plan available on Library's website) outlined recommendations regarding an increase in funding, specifically a 2% policy on city capital improvement projects and private, non-residential development; an enhanced role of the Cultural Arts Commission; creation of a Northwest area arts district and existing opportunities; creation of a blue ribbon task force to raise major funding for capital needs; establishment of art nights in Chula Vista; and a needs assessment for expansion/relocation of the Chula Vista Heritage Museum to name a few. A lengthy discussion ensued regarding the Plan with emphasis on the 2% policy on city capital improvement. At the end of the discussion, Trustees tabled the item. v. LIBRARY DIRECTOR'S REPORT A. MONTHLY REPORT B. IMLS MUSEUM GRANT Board was advised the Library did not receive the IMLS Grant C. FIT FOR liFE GRANT Tabled D. CITIZEN'S SURVEY Tabled E. ARTURO BARRIOS INVITATIONAL Tabled F. MATERIALS RECOVERY Tabled G. GRANTS GRANT - ROUND II Tabled H. PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT DAY Tabled I. STATE liBRARY REPORT Tabled J. MACY'S AND BARNES & NOBLE Trustees were advised that on November 8, from 6-9pm, the grand opening of the Barnes & Noble in the Eastern Urban Center, 10% of any purchases made would be donated to Library's Literacy program. K. Other 11-7 VI. COMMUNICATIONS A. FRIENDS Joan Roseman advised that the Friel!1ds meeting scheduled for the following day was canceled and they were waiting for the branch "wish lists." B. PUBLIC COMMENTS C. WRITTEN COMMENTS D. BOARD COMMENTS It was asked how applications for future Board members were coming along and Trustees were advised that there had been no recent application. It was requested that notice be posted on the Library Webpage. VII. ADJOURNMENT MEETING ADJOURNED AT 5:51PM. Next meeting scheduled for Wednesday, November 15, 2006 at 4:00pm. Respectfully Submitted: Anna Giuliano, Secretary Approved: 11-8 RESOLUTION NO. 2007- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING CHANGES TO THE LIBRARY MASTER FEE SCHEDULE WHEREAS, the Chula Vista Public Library has an extensive Local History Collection, which includes historic photographs and negatives, documents, newspapers, books, maps and other items relating to the heritage of the community; and WHEREAS, after the Library Department identified Local History as one of its major areas of emphasis in its five-year Strategic Plan, the department began to devote more resources to its Local History Collection; and WHEREAS, in 2003-2004, the Library hired History Associates Incorporated to complete an assessment of the Local History Collection; and WHEREAS, the assessment included numerous recommendations pertaining to preservation, management and storage of the materials, which are now being implemented by the Library; and WHEREAS, the Library has seen an increased demand from the public for photographic reproductions and assistance with historical research, which incurs costs for supplies and staff; and WHEREAS, many libraries and historical societies that have historic photographs and archived collections have instituted fees to assist in partially recovering these costs; and WHEREAS, in developing its proposed fee schedule, the Chula Vita Public Library selected fees that were comparable to or less than the fees charged by other organizations in the county; and WHEREAS, the proposed changes to the Library Master Fee Schedule include the addition ofreproduction, use, and other fees; and WHEREAS, it is estimated that these changes in the Library Master Fee Schedule will result in an increase of approximately $1,500 over the previous Fiscal Year; and WHEREAS, staff recommends that the Library master Fee Schedule be reformatted to accurately reflect previous Council actions, and to incorporate current recommended changes. 11-9 Resolution No. 2007- Page 2 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby approve the proposed changes to the Library Master Fee Schedule. Presented by Approved as to form by 'A'{1~~\\\~~\ Ann Moore City Attorney David Palmer Assistant City Manager / Director of Library J:\Attomey\RESO\FINANCE\Library Master Fee Schedule changes_O 1~2J.07.doc 11-10 ? CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item No.: ! ,.Q. Meeting Date: 1/23/07 SUBMITTED BY: CONSIDERATION OF WAIVING THE FORMAL BIDDING PROCESS AND APPROVAL OF AN AGREEMENT WITH COOPER ROBERTSON & PARTNERS FOR CONSULTANT SERVICES RELATED TO EVALUATION OF POTENTIAL STADIUM SITES FOR THE SAN DIEGO CHARGERS WITHIN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, ADOPTION OF GUIDING PRINCIPLES FOR CHARGER RELOCATION, AND THE REFORMATION OF THE CHARGERS SUBCOMMITTEE CHARGERS SUBCOMMITTEE ~ CITY MANAGER If ITEM TITLE: REVIEWED BY: 4/5THS VOTE: YES NO X BACKGROUND The approval of the attached consulting contract provides the City of Chula Vista with the necessary consultant resources to evaluate various sites within the City of Chula Vista for a stadium complex for the San Diego Chargers. The Three-Party Agreement ensures that the necessary work as directed by the City of Chula Vista will be paid for by the San Diego Chargers. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is statutorily exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15262 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Therefore, no environmental review is necessary. RECOMMENDATION That the City Council adopt the resolution waiving the formal consultant selection process, approving a Three-Party Agreement with Cooper Robertson and Partners, for consulting services 12-1 Date, Item No.: I "2... Meeting Date: 1/23/07 Page 2 of4 related to the evaluation of potential stadium sites within the City of Chula Vista and authorize the Mayor to sign the agreement. That the City Council adopt the guiding principles for Chargers' relocation. That the City Council reform the Chargers subcommittee. BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION N/A. DISCUSSION On May 9, 2006 the City Council unanimously voted for the City of Chula Vista to have initial conversations with the San Diego Chargers on the potential for a new stadium for the Chargers in Chula Vista. Over the next several months meetings were held between the City and the Chargers. The San Diego Chargers have expressed a continuing interest in working with the City. On December 19, 2006 the City Council created a subcommittee (Mayor Cox, Councilmember John McCann, City Attorney Ann Moore and Director of Planning and Building Jim Sandoval). The primary purpose of planning staff's presence on the subcommittee was to use their experience in developing a Scope of Work and contract for necessary consultant services. The site( s) evaluation is the first step of a process, which could result in the development of a stadium within Chula Vista. In order to conduct this analysis, expert consultant assistance is needed. There are very few firms nationally that have experience working on major professional sport complexes. Through extensive research, planning staff identified four firms that are nationally recognized experts in the area of stadium design. These firms are HOK, Ellerbe Becket, HNTB, and Cooper Robertson and Partners. The Chargers have retained HOK as their stadium consultant, leaving the other three firms available for proposal submittal. A proposed scope of work for consultant services was drafted by Planning Department staff and sent to Ellerbe Becket, HNTB, and Cooper Robertson and Partners. Proposals from all three firms were received by the City based upon the scope of work. A City staff committee comprised of the Director of Planning and Building, as well as other planning staff members, reviewed and evaluated the proposals consistent with City standards. The proposals were evaluated on a point system pursuant to the following criteria: firm's experience; quality of management tearn/project manager; capacity to perform work; project understanding; proposal quality; local experience and knowledge; and billing rates. Cooper Robertson's proposal received the most points from the evaluation committee. The cost of proposed services is as follows: Ellerbe Becket $508,800; HNTB $460,000; and Cooper Robertson $199,680. Pursuant to the criteria noted above, planning staff recommended the firm of Cooper Robertson and Partners. Based on planning staff's recommendation, the subcommittee concurred that Cooper Robertson and Partners provided the best and most responsive proposal. Not only does the firm have extensive experience in the analysis and development of stadium venues, for 12-2 r Date, Item No.: -- Meeting Date: 1/23/07 Page 3 of 4 example they recently assisted the New Yark Jets in its search for a new stadium site, they also have Chula Vista experience. Cooper Robertson and Partners was the lead planning consultant on the development of the Bay Front Master Plan. The subcommittee recommends the approval of a Three-Party agreement between the City of Chula Vista, the consulting firm of Cooper Robertson and Partners, and the San Diego Chargers. It is estimated it will take approximately three months to conduct the site analysis. Once the analysis of potential sites is completed, the City Council's Charger Subcommittee will meet with the San Diego Chargers in order to gauge their further interest. The results will then be brought to the full City Council in order to determine the City's continuing involvement. With the consultant selection process completed it is no longer necessary to have the Director of Planning and Building and the City Attorney as part of the subcommittee. The Subcommittee recommends a reformation of the subcommittee with the removal of the two staff positions. As stated previously, the purpose of this phase is to analyze potential stadium locations, not a stadium proposal. Should a draft stadium proposal be brought forth in the future, the Chargers Subcommittee recommends that the following principles should apply: A future stadium would: I. Include extensive public input 2. Have extensive public review of its design 3. Not involve existing City ofChula Vista general fund monies (new monies generated by the project may possibly be used as an incentive) 4. Not create either short or long-term fiscal deficits to the City 5. Identify environmental impacts and provide appropriate mitigation measures 6. Identify fmancial impacts and benefits to Chula Vista 7. Blend in with the character of the community 8. Give attention to the area surrounding the stadium complex 9. Not be detrimental to the Bay Front Master Plan 10. Not be detrimental to the future University Master Plan DECISION-MAKER CONFLICTS: Staff has reviewed the decision contemplated by this action and has determined that it is not site specific and consequently the 500 foot rule found in California Code of Regulations section I 8704.2(a)(l) is not applicable to this decision. FISCAL IMPACT There will be no net fiscal impact to the General Fund from this contract. The contract will be paid directly by the San Diego Chargers through a deposit account. The amount of the contract 12-3 ----.~ Date, Item No.: ~ Meeting Date: 1/23/07 Page 4 of 4 is for $199,680. The staffing costs will also be paid by the San Diego Chargers through a deposit account. ATTACHMENTS 1. Three-Party Agreement 2. Resolution approving Three-Party Agreement Prepared by: Jim Sandoval, AlCP, Director of Planning and Building, Planning & Building Dept. Document25 12-4 RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA WAIVING THE FORMAL BIDDING PROCESS AND APPROVING A THREE- PARTY AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA; COOPER ROBERTSON AND PARTNERS, CONSULTANT; AND THE SAN DIEGO CHARGERS, APPLICANT, FOR CONSULTING SERVICES RELATED TO THE PREPARATION OF SITE FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS FOR THE POTENTIAL CONSTRUCTION OF FOOTBALL STADIUM WITHIN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA. WHEREAS, the Applicant has deposited or will deposit an initial sum for the consulting services necessary for the preparation of a site feasibility analysis; and WHEREAS, it was determined by the Director of Planning and Building that staff has neither the available time or expertise to perform the subject work; and WHEREAS, the City is in immediate need of an experienced project site evaluation consultant that is familiar with the City's policies and procedures; and WHEREAS, the Consultant is uniquely qualified to serve as the Consultant for the preparation of a site feasibility analysis and associated documents based upon the fact that they are recognized experts in a highly specialized and technical field, and their experience with projects of a similar nature; and WHEREAS, the City Council fmds that the City's competitive bidding requirements as applied to this contract would be impractical and hereby waives the competitive bidding process; and WHEREAS, the Planning and Building Director has negotiated the details of the Three- Party Agreement in accordance with applicable City of Chula Vista policies and procedures; and WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the proposed activity for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and has determined that the activity is statutorily exempt from environmental review pursuant to Section 15262 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Therefore, no environmental review is necessary. NOW THERERFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby approve a Three-Party Agreement between the City of Chula Vista; CooperLRobertson and Partners ("Consultant"), and The San Diego Chargers ("Applicant") for consulting services for the preparation and submittal of site feasibility analysis. 12-5 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of City ofChula Vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Agreement on behalf of the City ofChula Vista. Presented by ~~~~ 1" City Alto . - . James D. Sandoval, AICP Director of Planning and Building 12-6 THE ATTACHED AGREEMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED AS TO FORM BY THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE AND WILL BE FORMALL Y SIGNED UPON APPROVAL BY THE CITY COUNCIL pi I ~nn City Attorney Dated: \ /,Q/07 Three Party Agreement Between City of Chula Vista, Cooper, Robertson & Partners, and San Diego Chargers for Consulting Work to be Rendered With regard to Chargers' Project 12-7 DRAFT Three Party Agreement Between City of Chula Vista, Cooper, Robertson & Partners, and San Diego Chargers For Consulting Work to be Rendered with regard to Chargers' Project 1. Parties This Agreement (~Agreement") is made as of the reference date set forth in Exhibit A, for the purposes of reference only, and effective as of the date last executed by the parties hereto, between the City of Chula Vista ("City") herein, a municipal corporation of the State of California, the person designated on the attached Exhibit A as ("Consultant") whose business form and address is indicated on the attached Exhibit A, and the San Diego Chargers ("Chargers") whose business form and address is indicated on the attached Exhibit A, and is made with reference to the following facts: 2. Recitals, Warranties and Representations. 2.1 Chargers are interested in investigating potential sites within the City for the location of a stadium. 2.2. In order to aide the City investigating various stadium sites, Work of the general nature and type described in Exhibits A and A-1, will need to be completed. 2.3. resources review by City does not presently have the "inhouse" staff or to perform the Work within the time frame needed for the Chargers and the City. 2.4. This Agreement proposes an arrangement by which the Chargers shall retain, and be liable for the costs of retaining, Consultant, who shall perform the services required of Consultant by this Agreement solely on behalf of, and under the direction of, the City. 3. Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED TO AND BETWEEN THE CITY, CONSULTANT, AND THE CHARGERS AS FOLLOWS: Page 1 12-8 3.1. Employment of Consultant by Chargers. Consultant is hereby engaged by the Chargers, not the City, and at the Chargers sole cost and expense, to perform to, and for the primary benefit of, City, and solely at City's direction, all of the services described on the attached Exhibit A-1, ("General Services"), and all services reasonable necessary to accomplish said General Services, and shall deliver such documents required ("Deliverables") herein, all within the time frames herein set forth, and in particular as set forth in Exhibit A, Paragraph 3, and if none are set forth, within a reasonable period of time for the diligent execution of Consultant's duties hereunder. Time is of the essence of this covenant. The Consultant does hereby agree to perform said General Services to and for the primary benefit of the City for the compensation herein fixed to be paid by the Chargers. The Chargers' sole obligation is to pay the amounts provided in this Agreement. The Chargers are not responsible for, and make no representations or warranties with respect to, the services to be provided by Consultant. In delivering the General Services hereunder, the Consultant shall do so in a good, professional manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions and in similar locations, at its own cost and expense except for the compensation and/or reimbursement, if any, herein promised, and shall furnish all of the labor, technical, administrative, professional and other personnel, all supplies and materials, machinery, equipment, printing, vehicles, transportation, office space and facilities, calculations, and all other means whatsoever, except as herein otherwise expressly specified to be furnished by the City or the Chargers, necessary or proper to perform and complete the work and provide the Services required of the Consultant. 3.2. Compensation of Consultant. Chargers shall compensate Consultant for all services rendered by Consultant without regard to the conclusions reached by the Consultant, and according to the terms and conditions set forth in Exhibit B adjacent to the governing compensation relationship indicated by a "checkmark" next to the appropriate arrangement, by paying said amount to the City, within 15 days of Consultant's billing, or in accordance with the security deposit Page 2 12-9 provisions of Paragraph 3.3 and Exhibit B, if checked, and upon receipt of such payment by the City, City shall promptly, not later than 15 days, or in accordance with the Bill Processing procedure in Exhibit B, if checked, pay said amount to the Consultant. City is merely acting in the capacity as a conduit for payment, and shall not be liable for the compensation unless it receives same from the Chargers. The Chargers shall not make any payments of compensation or otherwise directly to the Consultant, and so long as the Chargers pay the amounts due hereunder to the City, Consultant will look solely to the City for payment, and will have no rights to seek payment directly from Chargers. 3.2.1. Additional Work. If the Chargers, with the concurrence of City, determines that additional services ("Additional Services") are needed from Consultant of the type Consultant is qualified to render or reasonably related to the Services Consultant is otherwise required to provide by this Agreement, the Consultant agrees to provide such additional services on a time and materials basis paid for by Chargers at the rates set forth in Exhibit B, unless a separate fixed fee is otherwise agreed upon in writing for said Additional Work between the parties. 3.2.1.1. In the event that the City shall determine that additional work is required to be performed above and beyond the scope of work herein provided, City will consult with the Chargers regarding the additional work, and the Chargers may, in its sole and absolute discretion, either agree in writing to payor decline to pay for said additional work. If the Chargers decline or otherwise refuse to arrange and pay for said additional work, the City may, at its option, suspend any further consideration of potential sites for location of a stadium within the City unless and until the Chargers deposit the City's estimate of the costs of the additional work which the City determines is or may be required. If the Chargers agree in writing to pay for any such additional work, the Chargers shall pay any and all agreed additional costs for the additional work. 3.2.2. Reductions in Scope of Work. City may independently, or upon request from Consultant, from time to time reduce the Services to be performed by the Consultant under this Agreement. Upon doing so, City, Consultant and Chargers agree to meet in good faith and confer Page 3 12-10 for the purpose of negotiating a corresponding reduction in the compensation associated with said reduction. Upon failure to agree, the Fixed Fee may be unilaterally reduced by the City by the amount of time and materials budgeted by Consultant for the Services deleted. 3.3. Security for Payment of Compensation by Chargers. 3.3.1. Deposit. As security for the payment of Consultant by Chargers, Chargers shall, upon execution of this Agreement, deposit the amount indicated on Exhibit B as "Deposit Amount" with the City, as trustee for Consultant, the conditions of such trust being as indicated on Exhibit B and as hereinbelow set forth: 3.3.1.1 Other Terms of Deposit Trust. 3.3.1.1.1. City shall also be entitled to retain from said Deposit all costs incurred by City for which it is entitled to compensation by law or under the terms of this Agreement. 3.3.1.1.2. All interest earned on the Deposit Amount, if any, shall accrue to the benefit of, and be used for, Trust purposes. City may, in lieu of deposit into a separate bank account, separately account for said deposit in one or more of its various bank accounts, and upon doing so, shall proportionately distribute to the Deposit Trust, the average interest earned during the period on its general fund. 3.3.1.1.3. Any unused balance of Deposit Amount, including any unused interest earned, shall be returned to Chargers not later than 30 days after the termination of this Agreement and any claims resulting therefrom. 3.3.1.1.4. Chargers shall be notified within 30 days after of the use of the Deposit in any manner. Nothing herein shall invalidate use of the Deposit in the manner herein authorized. 3.3.1.1.5. At such time as City shall reasonably determine that inadequate funds remain on Deposit to secure future compensation likely due Consultant or City, City may make demand of Chargers to supplement said Deposit Amount in such amount as City shall reasonably specify. The Chargers may in its sole and absolute discretion agree in writing to supplement said Deposit Amount or decline to do so. If the Page 4 12-11 Chargers agree, the Chargers shall, within 15 days pay said amount ("Supplemental Deposit Amount") to City. Said Supplement Deposit Amount or Amounts shall be governed by the same terms of trust governing the original Deposit. 4. Non-Service Related Duties of Consultant. 4.1. Insurance. Consultant represents that it and its agents, staff and subconsultants employed by it in connection with the Services required to be rendered, are protected against the risk of loss by the following insurance coverages, in the following categories, and to the limits specified, policies of which are issued by Insurance Companies that have a Best's Rating of "A, Class V" or better, or shall meet with the approval of the City: 4.1.1. Statutory Worker's Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance coverage in the amount set forth in the attached Exhibit A, Paragraph 7. 4.1.2. Commercial General Liability Insurance including Business Automobile Insurance coverage in the amount set forth in Exhibit A, Paragraph 7, combined single limit applied separately to each project away from premises owned or rented by Consultant, which names City and Chargers as an Additional Insured, and which is primary to any policy which the City may otherwise carry ("Primary Coverage"), and which treats the employees of the City and Chargers in the same manner as members of the general public ("Cross-Liability Coverage") . 4.1.3. Errors and Omissions insurance, in the amount set forth in Exhibit A, Paragraph 7, unless Errors and Omissions coverage is included in the General Liability policy. 4.2. Proof of Insurance Coverage. 4.2.1. Certificates of Insurance. Consultant shall demonstrate proof of coverage herein required, prior to the commencement of services required under this Agreement, by delivery of Certificates of Insurance demonstrating same, and further indicating that the policies may not be canceled without at least thirty (30) days written notice to the Additional Insured. Page 5 12-12 4.2.2. Policy Endorsements Required. In order to demonstrate the Additional Insured Coverage, Primary Coverage and Cross-liability Coverage required under Consultant's Commercial General Liability Insurance Policy, Consultant shall deliver a policy endorsement to the City and Chargers demonstrating same. 4.2.3 Security for Performance - Performance Bond. In the event that the need for a Consultant to provide a Performance Bond arises, then Consultant shall provide to the City a performance bond in the form prescribed by the City and by such sureties which are authorized to transact such business in the State of California, listed as approved by the United States Department of Treasury Circular 570, http://www.fms.treas.gov/c570, and whose underwriting limitation is sufficient to issue bonds in the amount required by the Agreement, and which also satisfy the requirements stated in Section 995.660 of the Code of Civil Procedure, except as provided otherwise by laws or regulations. All bonds signed by an agent must be accompanied by a certified copy of such agent's authority to act. Surety companies must be duly licensed or authorized in the jurisdiction in which the Project is located to issue bonds for the limits so required. Form must be satisfactory to the Risk Manager or City Attorney which amount shall be indicated in an attachment as "Performance Bond" Exhibit. 4.3. Public Statements. All public statements and releases to the news be the responsibility of the City and the Chargers. Consultant shall not publish or release news items, articles or present lectures on the Project, either course of the study or after its completion, except concurrence of the City and the Chargers. media shall The comments, during the on written 4.4. Communication to Chargers. Consultant shall not communicate directly to the Chargers except in the presence of the City, or by writing an exact copy of which is simultaneously provided to City, except with the express consent of City. The Consultant may request such meetings with the City and the Chargers to ensure the adequacy of services performed by Consultant. 5. Documents Access. The Chargers shall provide to the Consultant, through the City, for the use by the Consultant and City, such documents, or Page 6 12-13 copies of such documents requested by Consultant, within the possession of the Chargers reasonably useful to the Consultant in performing the services herein required of Consultant, including but not limited to those described in Exhibit A, Paragraph 4. Notwithstanding this or any other provision of this Agreement, the Chargers will not be required to provide the Consultant, the City or anyone else any documents or information which the Chargers, in its sole and absolute discretion, deems confidential or proprietary. 6. Administrative Representatives. Each party designates the individuals ("Administrators") indicated in Exhibit A, Paragraph 5, as said party's contract administrator who is authorized by said party to represent them in the routine administration of this Agreement. 7. Conflicts of Interest 7.1. Consultant is Designated as an FPPC Filer. If Consultant is designated on Exhibit A, Paragraph 6, as an "FPPC filer", Consultant is deemed to be a "Consultant" for the purposes of the Political Reform Act conflict of interest and disclosure provisions, and shall report his economic interests to the City Clerk on the required Statement of Economic Interests in such reporting categories as are specified in Paragraph 6 of Exhibit A, or if none are specified, then as determined by the City Attorney. 7.2. Decline to Participate. Regardless of whether Consultant is designated as an FPPC Filer, Consultant shall not make, or participate in making or in any way attempt to use Consultant's position to influence a governmental decision in which Consultant knows or has reason to know Consultant has a financial interest other than the compensation promised by this Agreement. 7.3. Search to Determine Economic Interests. Regardless of whether Consultant is designated as an FPPC Filer, Consultant warrants and represents that Consultant has diligently conducted a search and inventory of Consultant's economic interests, as the term is used in the regulations promulgated by the Fair Political Practices Commission, and has determined that Consultant does not, to the best of Consultant's Page 7 12-14 knowledge, have an economic interest which would conflict with Consultant's duties under this Agreement. 7 . 4 . Promise Not to Acquire Conflicting Interests. Regardless of whether Consultant is designated as an FPPC Filer, Consultant further warrants and represents that Consultant will not acquire, obtain, or assume an economic interest during the term of this Agreement which would constitute a conflict of interest as prohibited by the Fair Political Practices Act. 7.5. Duty to Advise of Conflicting Interests. Regardless of whether Consultant is designated as an FPPC Filer, Consultant further warrants and represents that Consultant will immediately advise the City Attorney of City if Consultant learns of an economic interest of Consultant's which may result in a conflict of interest for the purpose of the Fair Political Practices Act, and regulations promulgated thereunder. 7.6. Specific Warranties Against Economic Interests. Consultant warrants and represents that neither Consultant, nor Consultant's immediate family members, nor Consultant's employees or agents ("Consultant Associates") presently have any interest, directly or indirectly, whatsoever in any of the properties which may be the subject matter of this investigation, or in any property within 10 radial miles from the exterior boundaries of any of the properties which may be the subject matter of this investigation, or ("Prohibited Interest"). Consultant agrees that Consultant Associates shall not acquire any such Prohibited Interest within the Term of this Agreement, or for 12 months after the expiration of this Agreement. Consultant further warrants and represents that no promise of future employment, remuneration, consideration, gratuity or other reward or gain has been made to Consultant or Consultant Associates by Chargers or by any other party as a result of Consultant's performance of this Agreement. Consultant promises to advise City of any such promise that may be made during the Term of this Agreement, or for 12 months thereafter. Notwithstanding said promise, nothing in this Agreement will prevent consultant, after its work hereunder is completed or its services terminated, from accepting an engagement with another entity with respect to a possible Chargers stadium in a venue other than in the City of Chula Vista. Page 8 12-15 During the term hereof, Consultant may not conduct or solicit any business for any party to this Agreement, or for any third party which may be in conflict with Consultant's responsibilities under this Agreement. 8. Default of the Consultant for Breach. This Agreement may be terminated by the CITY for default if the Consultant breaches this Agreement or if the Consultant refuses or fails to pursue the work under this Agreement or any phase of the work with such diligence which would assure its completion within a reasonable period of time. Termination of this Agreement because of a default of the Consultant shall not relieve the Consultant from liability of such default. 9. Right to Terminate Agreement for Convenience, Documents. 9.1. Notwithstanding any other section or provision of this Agreement, the CITY and the Chargers shall each have the right, in its sole and absolute discretion, to terminate this Agreement or any work to be performed pursuant to this Agreement at any time. 9.2. In the event of termination of this Agreement by the CITY or the Chargers in the absence of default of the Consultant, the City shall pay the Consultant for the reasonable value of the services actually performed by the Consultant up to the date of such termination, less the aggregate of all sums previously paid to the Consultant for services performed after execution of this Agreement and prior to its termination in accordance with Section 3.2 herein. 9.3. The Consultant hereby expressly waives any and all claims for damage or compensation arising under this Agreement, except as set forth herein, in the event of such termination. 9.4. In the event of termination of this Agreement by any party hereto, the Consultant shall deliver to the City, all field notes, surveys, studies, reports, plans, drawings and all other materials and documents prepared by the Consultant in performance of this Agreement, and all such documents and materials shall be the property of the City; provided however, that the Consultant may retain copies for their own use and the City shall provide a copy, at Chargers' cost, of all such documents to the Chargers. 9.5. Chargers shall not exercise any control or direction over Consultant's work. Page 9 12-16 10. Administrative Claims Requirement and Procedures No suit shall be brought arising out of this Agreement, against the City, unless a claim has first been presented in writing and filed with the City of Chula Vista and acted upon by the City of Chula Vista in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 1.34 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, the provisions of which are incorporated by this reference as if set fully set forth herein. 11. Hold Harmless and Indemnification Consultant shall defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, its elected and appointed officers and employees, and the Chargers from and against all claims for damages, liability, cost and expense (including without limitation attorneys fees) arising out of or alleged by third parties to be the result of the negligent acts, errors or omissions or the willful misconduct of the Consultant, and the Consultant's employees, subcontractors or other persons, agencies or firms for whom Consultant is legally responsible in connection with the execution of the work covered by this Agreement, except only for those claims, damages, liability, costs and expenses (including without limitations, attorneys fees) arising from the sole negligence or sole willful misconduct of the City, its officers, employees or of the Chargers. Also covered is liability arising from, connected with, caused by or claimed to be caused by the active or passive negligent acts or omissions of the City, its agents, officers, or employees or of the Chargers which may be in combination with the active or passive negligent acts or omissions of the Consultant, its employees, agents or officers, or any third party. With respect to losses arising from Consultant's professional errors or omissions, Consultant shall defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, its elected and appointed officers and employees and the Chargers, from and against all claims for damages, liability, cost and expense (including without limitation attorney fees) except for those claims arising from the negligence or willful misconduct of City, its officers, employees, or of the Chargers. Consultant's indemnification shall include any and all costs, expenses, attorney fees and liability incurred by the City, its officers, agents or employees or the Chargers in defending against such claims, whether the same proceed to Page 10 12-17 judgment or not. Consultant's obligations under this Section shall not be limited by any prior or subsequent declaration by the Consultant. Consultant's obligations under this Section shall survive the termination of this Agreement. For those professionals who are required to be licensed by the state (e.g. architects, landscape architects, surveyors and engineers), the following indemnification provisions should be utilized: (1) Indemnification and Hold Harmless Agreement With respect to any liability, including but not limited to claims asserted or costs, losses, attorney fees, or payments for injury to person or property caused or claimed to be caused by the acts or omissions of the Consultant, or Consultant's employees, agents, and officers, arising out of any services performed in accordance with this Agreement, except liability for Professional Services covered under Section 11.2, the Consultant agrees to defend, indemnify, protect, and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers, or employees and of the Chargers from and against all liability. Also covered is liability arising from, connected with, caused by, or claimed to be caused by the active or passive negligent acts or omissions of the City, its agents, officers, or employees or of the Chargers, which may be in combination with the active or passive negligent acts or omissions of the Consultant, its employees, agents or officers, or any third party. The Consultant's duty to indemnify, protect and hold harmless shall not include any claims or liabilities arising from the sole negligence or sole willful misconduct of the City, its agents, officers or employees or of the Chargers. This section in no way alters, affects or modifies the Consultant's obligation and duties under Exhibits A and A-1 to this Agreement. (2) Indemnification for Professional Services As to the Consultant's professional obligation, work or services involving this Agreement the Consultant agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the City, its agents, officers and employees and the Chargers from and against any and all liability, claims, costs, and damages, including but not limited to, attorney fees, that arise out of, or pertain to, or relate to the negligence, recklessness or willful misconduct of Consultant and its agents in the performance of services under this Agreement, but this indemnity does not apply liability for damages for death or bodily injury to persons, injury to Page 11 12-18 property, or other loss, arising from sole negligence, willful misconduct or defects in design by City or the agents, servants, independent contractors or of the Chargers who are directly responsible to City, or arising from the active negligence of City. 12. Termination of Agreement for Cause If, through any cause, Consultant shall fail to fulfill in a timely and proper manner Consultant's obligations under this Agreement, or if Consultant shall violate any of the covenants, agreements or stipulations of this Agreement, City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof at least five (5) days before the effective date of such termination. In that event, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, reports and other materials prepared by Consultant shall, at the option of the City, become the property of the City, and Consultant shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed on such documents and other materials up to the effective date of Notice of Termination, not to exceed the amounts payable hereunder, and less any damages caused City by Consultant's breech. 13. Business Licenses Consultant agrees to obtain a business license from the City and to otherwise comply with Title 5 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code. 14. Miscellaneous. 14.1. Consultant not authorized to Represent City. Unless specifically authorized in writing by City, neither Consultant nor Chargers shall have authority to act as City's agent to bind City to any contractual agreements whatsoever. 14.2. Notices. All notices, demands or requests provided for or permitted to be given pursuant to this Agreement must be in writing. All notices, demands and requests to be sent to any party shall be deemed to have been properly given or served if personally served or deposited in the United States mail, addressed to such party, postage prepaid, registered or certified, with return receipt Page 12 12-19 requested, at the addresses identified for the parties in Exhibit A. 14.3. Entitlement to Subsequent Notices. No notice to or demand on the parties for notice of an event not herein legally required to be given shall in itself create the right in the parties to any other or further notice or demand in the same, similar or other circumstances. 14.4. Entire Agreement. This Agreement, together with any other written document referred to or contemplated herein, embody the entire Agreement and understanding between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. Neither this Agreement nor any provision hereof may be amended, modified, waived or discharged except by an instrument in writing executed by the party against which enforcement of such amendment, waiver or discharge is sought. 14.5. Capacity of Parties. Each signatory and party hereto hereby warrants and represents to the other party that it has legal authority and capacity and direction from its principal to enter into this Agreement; that all resolutions or other actions have been taken so as to enable it to enter into this Agreement. 14.6. Governing Law/Venue. This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Any action arising under or relating to this Agreement shall be brought only in the federal or state courts located in San Diego County, State of California, and if applicable, the City of Chula Vista, or as close thereto as possible. Venue for this Agreement, and performance hereunder, shall be the City of Chula Vista. 14.7. Modification. No modification or waiver of any provision of this Agreement shall be effective unless the same shall be in writing and signed by the parties hereto, and then shall be valid only in the specific instance and for the purpose for which given. 14.8. Counterparts. Page 13 12-20 This Agreement may be executed in more than one counterpart, each of which shall be deemed to be an original but all of which, when taken together shall constitute but one instrument. 14.9. Severability. In the event that any provision of this Agreement shall for any reason, be determined to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, the parties hereto shall negotiate in good faith and agree to such amendments, modifications, or supplements to this Agreement or such other appropriate action as shall, to the maximum extent practicable in light of such determination, implement and give effect to the intentions of the parties as reflected herein. 14.10. Headings. The captions and headings in this Agreement are for convenience only and shall not define or limit the provisions hereof. 14.11. Waiver. No course of dealing or failure or delay, nor the single failure or delay, or the partial exercise of any right, power or privilege, on the part of the parties shall operate as a waiver of any rights herein contained. The making or the acceptance of a payment by either party with knowledge of the existence of a breach shall not operate or be construed to operate as a waiver of any such breach. 14.12. Remedies. The rights of the parties under this Agreement are cumulative and not exclusive of any rights or remedies which the parties might otherwise have unless this Agreement provides to the contrary. 14.13. No Additional Beneficiaries. Despite the fact that the required performance under this Agreement may have an affect upon persons not parties hereto, the parties specifically intend no benefit therefrom, and agree that no performance hereunder may be enforced by any person not a party to this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, this is a three party agreement and the City is an express third party Page 14 12-21 beneficiary of the promises of Consultant to provide services paid for by Chargers. 15. Ownership, Publication, Reproduction and Use of Material All reports, studies, information, data, statistics, forms, designs, plans, procedures, systems and any other materials or properties produced under this Agreement shall be the sole and exclusive property of City. No such materials or properties produced in whole or in part under this Agreement shall be subject to private use, copyrights or patent rights by Consultant in the United States or in any other country without the express written consent of City. City shall have unrestricted authority to publish, disclose (except as may be limited by the provisions of the Public Records Act), distribute, and otherwise use, copyright or patent, in whole or in part, any such reports, studies, data, statistics, forms or other materials or properties produced under this Agreement. 16. This Agreement shall terminate when the Parties have complied with all executed provisions herein, unless terminated in accordance with paragraph 8 or 9 of this Agreement. (End of Page. Next Page is Signature Page.) Signature Page Page 15 12-22 NOW THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HERETO, having read and understood the terms and conditions of this Agreement, do hereby express their consent to the terms hereof by setting their hand hereto on the date set forth adjacent thereto. Dated: City of Chula Vista by: Attest: Susan Bigelow City Clerk Approved as to Form: Ann Moore City Attorney Dated: Consultant: by: Dated: Chargers: by: J:\Attorney\MichaelSh\CHARGERS\3PartyAgt-Interim Final.doc Page 16 12-23 Exhibit A NOTE: Exhibit A to be finalized and Exhibit A-l (the Scope) to be inserted prior to the City Council meeting. Reference Date of Agreement: Effective Date of Agreement: City of Chula Vista, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910 Consultant: Business Form of Consultant: Sole Proprietorship Partnership Corporation Address: Chargers: Business Form of Chargers: ( ) Sole Proprietorship ( ) Partnership ( ) Corporation Address: 1. Project Description ("Project"): See Exhibit A-I 2. General Nature of Consulting Services ("Services- General") : See Exhibit A-I 3. Schedule, Milestone, Time-Limitations within which to Perform Services. Date for Commencement of Consultant Services: ( ) Same as Effective Date of Agreement Page 17 12-24 Dates or Time Limits for Delivery of Deliverables: Deliverable No.1: Deliverable No.2: Deliverable No.3: Dates for completion of all Consultant services: 4 . Documents to be ( ) site plans elevations ( ) ( ) other: provided by Chargers ( ) grading plans ( project description. to Consultant: ) architectural 5. Contract Administrators. City: Chargers: Consultant: 6. Statement of Economic Interests, Consultant Reporting Categories, per Conflict of Interest Code: Not Applicable. Not an FPPC Filer.' Category No.1. Investments and sources of income. Category No.2. Interests in real property. 1. If Consultant, in the performance of its services under this agreement: 1) conducts research and arrives at conclusions with respect to its rendition of information, advice, recommendations or counsel independent of the control and direction of the City or of any City official, other than normal contract monitoring; and 2) possesses no authority with respect to any City decision beyond the rendition of information, advice, recommendations or counsel, he should not be designated as an FPPC Filer. Page 18 12-25 ) Category No.3. ) Category No.4. ) Category No.5. ) Category No.6. ) Category No.7. 7. Insurance Requirements: Investments, interest in real property and sources of income subject to the regulatory, permit or licensing authority of the department. Investments in business entities and sources of income which engage in land development, construction or the acquisition or sale of real property. Investments in business entities and sources of income of the type which, within the past two years, have contracted with the City of Chula Vista (Redevelopment Agency) to provide services, supplies, materials, machinery or equipment. Investments in business entities and sources of income of the type which, within the past two years, have contracted with the designated employee's department to provide services, supplies, materials, machinery or equipment. Business positions. Statutory Worker's Compensation Insurance Employer's Liability Insurance coverage: $1,000,000. Commercial General Liability Insurance: $1,000,000. Errors and Omissions insurance: None Required (included in Commercial General Liability coverage). Errors and Omissions insurance: $250,000 (not included in Commercial General Liability coverage) . Page 19 12-26 Exhibit B Compensation Schedule and Deposit: Terms and Conditions. Single Fixed Fee Arrangement. For performance of all of the General and Detailed Services of Consultant as herein required, Applicant shall pay a single fixed fee in the amounts and at the times or milestones set forth below: ( X) Single Fixed Fee Amount: $199,680 Milestone or Event Percent and Amount of Fixed Fee 1. Signing of this agreement by all parties and upon the request of the consultant. 10% ($19,968) 2. Completion of Phase I 40% ($79,872) 3. Completion of Phase II 50% ($99,840 4. 25% Contingency Fee** $49,920 **The Director of Planning and Building in his discretion independently or upon request from the Consultant, from time to time, may negotiate additional services to be performed by the Consultant under this Agreement in order to cover unforeseen issues that may be identified during the preparation of the document ("Additional Services"). The cost of Additional Services in connection with the document shall not exceed 25% of the total contract amount ($49,920). Phased Fixed Fee Arrangement. For the performance of each phase or portion of the General and Detailed Services of Consultant as are separately identified in Exhibit C, under the category labeled "Phased Fixed Fee Arrangement", Applicant shall pay the fixed fee associated with each phase of Services, in the amounts and at the times or milestones set forth hereinbelow ("Phase Fixed Fee Arrangement") . Consultant shall not commence Services under any Phase, and shall Page 20 12-27 not be entitled to the compensation for a Phase, unless Applicant shall have issued a notice to proceed to Consultant as to said Phase. Time and Materials For performance of the General and Detailed Services of Consultant as herein required, Applicant shall pay Consultant for the productive hours of time and material spent by Consultant in the performance of said Services, at the rates or amounts set forth hereinbelow according to the following terms and conditions: Not-to-Exceed Arrangement Limitation on Time and Materials Notwithstanding the expenditure by Consultant of time and materials in excess of said Maximum Compensation amount, Consultant agrees that Consultant will perform all of the General and Detailed Services herein required of Consultant for including all Materials and other "reimburseables" ("Maximum Compensation"). The City will also receive a standard administrative fee amounting to 10% of the contract. ( X ) Limitation without Further Authorization on Time and Materials Arrangement At such time as Consultant shall have incurred time and materials equal to $199,680 (plus 25% if negotiated as set forth above) ("Authorization Limit"), Consultant shall not be entitled to any additional compensation without further authorization issued in writing and approved by the City Council. Nothing herein shall preclude Consultant from providing additional Services at Consultant's own cost and expense. Consultant's Rate Schedule Category of Employee Hourly Rate Cooper, Robertson & Partners: Partner-in-Charge Project Manager Project Architect $125 $300 $175 P&D Consultants: Page 21 12-28 Principal-in-Charge Project Director Project Engineer Senior Engineer Staff Engineer $220 $195 $175 $180 $105 (X) Permitted Subconsultants: P&D Consultants 8954 Rio San Diego Drive, Suite 610 San Diego, CA 92108 (619) 291-1475 Materials Separately Paid For by Applicant - Cost or Rate Materials NA Reports Copies Travel Printing Postage Delivery ( ) Long Distance Telephone Charges (X) Other -SANDAG Model Run Fees NA NA NA NA NA Actual Deposit (X) Deposit Amount: $199,680 - As agreed to by the Applicant, 100% of the Deposit ($199,680) is to be made by the San Diego Chargers. Applicant agrees to deposit within 15 days if City requests to do so, for additional Materials separately paid for by the Applicant, and up to $49,920 if additional services are required, in accordance with Section 3.2.1.1. Page 22 12-29 (X) Use of Deposit to Pay Consultant. Notwithstanding the sole duty and liability of Applicant to pay Consultant, if this paragraph is "checked", upon City's receipt of billing by Consultant, and determination by City in good faith that Consultant's billing is proper, a judgment for which Applicant agrees to hold City harmless and waive any claim against City, City shall pay Consultant's billing from the amount of the Deposit. If Applicant shall protest the propriety of a billing to City in advance of payment, City shall consider Applicant's protest and any evidence submitted prior to the due date for the payment of said bill by Applicant in making its good faith determination of propriety. () Use of Deposit as Security Only; Applicant to Make Billing Payments. Upon determination by City made in good faith that Consultant is entitled to compensation which shall remain unpaid by Applicant 30 days after billing, City may, at its option, use the Deposit to pay said billing. (X) Bill Processing: A. Consultant's Billing to be submitted for the following period of time: ( ) Monthly ( ) Quarterly (X) Other: Milestone B. Day of the Period for submission of Consultant's Billing: ( ) First of the Month ( ) 15th Day of each Month ( ) End of the Month (X) Other: Upon Completion of Milestone C. City's Account Number: To be assigned after agreement is processed. D. Security for Performance Performance Bond, $ Letter of Credit, $ Other Security: Page 23 12-30 Type: Amount: $ (X ) Retention. If this space is checked, then notwithstanding other provisions to the contrary requiring the payment of compensation to the Consultant sooner, the City shall be entitled to retain, at their option, the following Retention Percentage until the City determines that the Retention Release Event, listed below, has occurred: Retention Percentage: 10% Retention Amount: $ Retention Release Event: (X) Completion of All Consultant Services to the satisfaction of the Director of Planning and Building. ( ) Other: Page 24 12-31 CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ITEM TITLE: January 23,2007, Item /3 RESOLUTION APPROVING A LEASE AGREEMENT WITH HTH LEARNING TO LEASE 8 ACRES OF CITY- OWNED LAND TO DEVELOP A CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER, WITH AN OPTION TO DEVELOP A CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL ON 2.7 ACRES, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT .nY ACTING DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ffM INTERIM CITY MANAGER 1/ v SUBMITTED BY: REVIEWED BY: 4/5THS VOTE: YES D NO 0 BACKGROUND HTH Learning is a private nonprofit organization overseeing the development and operation of the facilities that house High Tech High schools. High Tech High is a charter high school design model, emphasizing small school size, small classes, personalized project-based learning, real-world immersion, and performance-based assessment. HTH Learning currently operates a total of seven high, middle and elementary schools, with six in San Diego and one school in northern California. Representatives of HTH Learning approached City staff over one year ago to discuss locating one or more High Tech High schools in Chula Vista. Staff and HTH Learning believe that the best location for a campus is on City-owned land within the City's University Park and Research Center (see Attachment I). Staff has negotiated a lease agreement with HTH Learning to develop High Tech High Environmental and a related environmental research center on an 8-acre site. The lease provides for an option for HTH Learning to develop High Tech Middle Environmental on approximately 2.7 acres adjacent to the high school. In the future, High Tech High Learning is also interested in developing up to three additional schools within the University Park and Research Center (UPRC) campus. Terms related to these additional schools would be the subject of a future negotiation. 13-1 January 23, 2007, Item~ Page 2 of 5 ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The proposed lease has been structured so that the agreement will not take effect until such time as HTH Learning receives land use approval for their project. HTH Learning has submitted an application for a conditional use permit (pCC07-024) and environmental initial study (IS07 -017). Prior to the lease term commencing, the City must approve the conditional use permit and intial study. The City has retained its sole and unfettered discretion in all future actions and if the project is not approved the lease is null and void. If the project is approved, IS07-017 will satisfy the requirements of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for both the project and the lease agreement, and no further environmental review will be necessary. RECOMMENDATION Adopt the resolution approving a lease agreement with HTH Learning to lease 8 acres of City-owned land to develop a charter high school and environmental research center, with an option to develop a charter middle school on 2.7 acres, and authorizing the City Manager to execute said agreement. BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION Not Applicable DISCUSSION High Tech High High Tech High began in 2000 as a single charter high school launched by a coalition of San Diego business leaders and educators concerned by the city's shortage of qualified high-tech workers. It has evolved into a nationally recognized school development organization with a growing portfolio of innovative charter schools that are designed to ensure that all students graduate well prepared for college, work, and citizenship. High Tech High creates a personalized, project-based learning environment where students are known well and challenged to meet high expectations. High Tech High Environmental (HTHE) and High Tech Middle Environmental (HTME) will be small, academically rigorous, public charter schools based on the HTH design principals of personalization, adult-world connection, and common intellectual mission. The primary goals of HTHE and HTME will be to: · Provide students with relevant academic and workplace skills, preparing graduates for rewarding lives in an increasingly technological and global society. · Increase the number of low-income and minority students who succeed in high school and postsecondary education and who become productive members and leaders in the high-technology industry. 13-2 January 23, 2007, Item~ Page 3 of 5 Environmental Focus The focus on global environmental issues at HTHE and HTME will be reflected not only in the curriculum of each school, but also in the design and function of the school facilities. The design will utilize two green building guides to benchmark the "green-ness" of the High Tech High schools. The two green building guides to be used as benchmarks are the US Green Building Council's LEED rating system and the Collaborative for the High Performance Schools Best Practices System. Each of these systems incorporates sustainable products, water efficiency, energy and atmosphere, materials and resources and indoor air quality. It has been proposed that the school be entirely energy autonomous and serve as a paragon for environmental education with the hope that the school will receive the highest possible certification on the LEED rating system. The proposed schools' academic mission and research facilities will provide future collaboration and research opportunities with the National Energy Center for Sustainable Communities, which will also be located at the UPRC, as well as future academic partners within the campus. The proposal by High Tech High is strategically aligned with the goals and objectives of the UPRC and the City ofChula Vista, and will enhance the efforts of the City to develop the UPRC. Proposed Lease Terms The proposed lease agreement will allow the development of an environmentally focused high school and related environmental research facility on an eight-acre site. The lease will be for an initial term of 50 years, with two 25-year options for the nominal rate of $1 per year. The agreement requires HTH Learning to receive all necessary approvals from the City and all other appropriate agencies, including, but not limited to a Conditional Use Permit (CUP). The approval of the lease agreement does not approve the project itself. The City retains its sole and unfettered discretion to approve or disapprove any future discretionary actions that may come before the City. If HTH Learning fails to get all necessary approvals, the lease will become null and void. The lease agreement includes one additional option, which will allow for an environmentally focused middle school on approximately 2.7 acres directly east of the high school site. The option can only be exercised once High Tech High demonstrates that they have the financial capacity and student demand to build and operate the additional school. It is anticipated that the lease option for the additional acreage would be exercised within the next one to two years. When completed, the high and middle schools will have approximately 900 students and 65 faculty and staff. The lease also acknowledges High Tech High Learning's desire to pursue the development of up to three additional schools on a maximum of six acres within the the UPRC campus. The potential for the additional schools is a long-term concept, and is not contemplated for approximately three to six years. Terms related to these additional schools are not included in the proposed lease. 13-3 January 23, 2007, Item~ Page 4 of 5 Staff is supportive of the promotion of educational opportunities in all areas of the City. However, the UPRC offers unique opportunities for education and research collaboration and synergy for High Tech High's environmental programs that are currently unavailable at other sites. Proposed Site HTHE and HTME will be located on City-owned land within the University Park and Research Center. The site is located on the south side of Hunte Parkway, east of Eastlake Parkway at the approximate future intersection of Hunte Parkway and Discovery Falls. Prior to discussions with High Tech High regarding the proposed site, Staff discussed the specific location with representatives of adj acent landowners, JPB and Otay Land Company. Staff received assurances from them that the contemplated site was not being considered as part of land trade proposals related to potential dedication of additional UPRC land. Staff has also worked with the UPRC project consultants to ensure the proposed site will not preclude or interfere with the overall development of the UPRC. The lease agreement requires HTH to cooperate with the City and its academic partners in all future planning and development of the UPRC. Staff has held discussions regarding potential participation in the UPRC with several additional educational entities including the Sweetwater Union High School District. Staff will continue to work with each of the interested organizations to develop innovative concepts for possible participation in the UPRC. Benefits to the Community The High Tech High schools will be the first project developed in the City's University Park and Research Center (UPRC). This project will help establish the UPRC by encouraging academic excellence, increasing access to higher education, and promoting environmentally sustainable development for the citizens of Chula Vista. High Tech High is an extraordinarily high profIle charter organization with an established reputation for engaging regional and national commercial sector and non-profit partners. The presence of High Tech High in south county will increase the region's visibility as the City continues to seek out education partners at all levels of academia that meet, and seek to further the goals and objectives the Council has established for the University Park and Research Center. DECISION MAKER CONFLICT Staff has reviewed the property holdings of the City Council and has found no property holdings within 500 feet of the boundaries of the property which is the subject of this action. 13-4 January 23, 2007, Item~ Page 5 of5 FISCAL IMP ACT The proposed project will not have an impact on the City's General Fund. The proposed High Tech High site is currently owned by the City and not subject to property tax, this exemption will continue under the lease to High Tech High. The site is considered part of the UPRC campus and is not envisioned for future commercial or revenue producing use that would change the property tax status for the site. The nominal lease rate proposed by staff is $1 per year. High Tech High Learning will be responsible for all costs associated with the development and maintenance of their facility. The lease structure will allow the City to retain long-term ownership and control of the property. ATTACHMENTS I. Vicinity Map Prepared by: Craig Ruiz, Principal Community Development Specialist, Community Development Dept. 13-5 ......-I ~ 11) s ~ u C'd t:: < ~ <:lJ ~ = <:lJO etl<:lJ ~ . ...... ... ..= >~ U A. \I.H. U A. U A. ,2 :0 ::l a. . 'ti) 1Il ::l o ell .2 :0 ::J a. o ~ m ~ U; >~ ~ I ~E'<\ ~ \ ~ lla~ \ u ,~~ \ -(1.1 ..c= \ Jl5 ~U ~ ~ u 8 ~ ~ 'ij ~ ~ lil i "" i 11 E)~ i '!o ;x; \ 13-6 COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 2007- RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING A LEASE AGREEMENT WITH HTH LEARNING TO LEASE 8 ACRES OF CITY-OWNED LAND TO DEVELOP A CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL AND ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH CENTER, WITH AN OPTION TO DEVELOP A CHARTER MIDDLE SCHOOL ON 2.7 ACRES, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAID AMENDMENT WHEREAS, HTH Learning is a recognized public benefit corporation providing certain educational programs, services and/or other related services, programs and activities to the general public, including the citizens of the City; and WHEREAS, HTH Learning has developed and operates seven charter high, middle and elementary schools in San Diego and northern California; and WHEREAS, HTH Learning has received a State-wide charter which allows them to develop additional charter schools throughout the State of California; and WHEREAS, it is a target expectation of their Statewide charter, that forty percent of the students enrolled at future High Tech High schools be from low-income households; and WHEREAS, HTH Learning approached the City of Chula Vista about developing High Tech High Environmental, High Tech Middle Environmental and an environmental research facility within the City of ChuIa Vista; and WHEREAS, City staff and HTH Learning believe that the best location for High Tech High Environmental and High Tech Middle Environmental is within the City's University Park and Research Center; and WHEREAS, the academic mission and environmental research facility of the proposed schools are aligned with the strategic goals and objectives of the University Park and Research Center; and WHEREAS, staff has negotiated a lease agreement with High Tech High Learning to develop High Tech High Environmental, High Tech Middle Environmental and an environmental research facility; and WHEREAS, the City and HTH Learning agree that there may be a community benefit to having additional High Tech High schools in addition the two schools contemplated in this agreement, and that said additional schools could be located within the University Park and Research Center; and 13-7 Resolution No. 2007- Page 2 WHEREAS, City hereby acknowledges said educational programs, services and/or activities provided by High Tech High Learning are valuable consideration received from High Tech High Learning in return for its use of said real property in accordance with the terms, covenants, conditions and provisions contained within the lease agreement and incorporated herein; and WHEREAS, the Lessee partners with the business community to provide educational programs and work experience for its students, and intends to continue the practice of partnering with the business community in the schools considered in this agreement; and WHEREAS, the proposed lease has been structured so that the agreement will not take effect until such time as HTH Learning receives land use approval for their project. HTH Learning has submitted an application for a conditional use permit (PCC07-024) and environmental initial shldy (IS07 -017). Prior to the lease ternl commencing, the City must approve the conditional use permit and initial study. The City has retained its sole and unfettered discretion in all future actions and, if the project is not approved, the lease is null and void. If the project is approved, IS07 -017 will satisfy the requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) for both the project and the lease agreement, and no further environmental review will be necessary. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista, that it hereby approves the Lease Agreement between the City of Chula Vista and HTH Learning to develop and operate the High Tech High Environmental and an environmental research center, with an option to develop High Tech Middle Environmental on City-owned property with in the City's University Park and Research Center, and authorize the City Manager to sign said agreement. Presented by Approved as to form by Ann Hix Acting Director of Community Development ~~d U1r" fWg Moore City Attorney J:\Attorney\CINDYMc\High Tech High Reso.doc 13-8 THE ATTACHED AGREEMENT HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND APPROVED AS TO FORM BY THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE AND WILL BE FORMALL Y SIGNED UPON APPROVAL BY THE CITY COUNCIL t) J.dL it);;: 9A ~ Ann Mo City Attorney Dated: I IriJ }Ci"7 Property Lease Agreement By and Between The City of Chula Vista and HTH Learning For the lease of City-owned Real Property Located at the southeast comer of the future intersection of Discovery Falls Drive and Hunte Parkway (APN 643-070-10) 13-9 PROPERTY LEASE AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND HTH LEARNING FOR THE LEASE OF CITY OWNED REAL PROPERTY LOCATED AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE FUTURE INTERSECTION OF DISCOVERY FALLS DRIVE AND HUNTE PARKWAY (APN 643-070-10) DATED January 9, 2007 13-10 CITY OF CHULA VISTA PROPERTY LEASE AGREEMENT WITH HTH LEARNING FOR PROPERTY AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE FUTURE INTERSECTION OF DISCOVERY FALLS DRIVE AND HUNTE PARKWAY (APN 643-070-10) TIDS LEASE AGREEMENT is executed between the CITY OF CHULA VISTA, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called "City", and HTH LEARNING, a California non-profit public benefit corporation, hereinafter called "Lessee". RECITALS WHEREAS, City is owner of the real property described herein; WHEREAS, the City and the Lessee intend to enter into an agreement that will allow for the development of up to five High Tech High charter schools and an environmental research center on property within the City's University Park and Research Center; and WHEREAS, this lease agreement will allow for the development of High Tech High environmental high school and an environmental research center on eight (8) acres of City-owned land, as more precisely described below; and WHEREAS, this lease agreement will consider High Tech High's option to lease approximately two additional acres adjacent to High Tech High environmental high school to develop and operate a second High Tech High school on City-owned land, as more precisely described below; and WHEREAS, the City and Lessee agree that there is a community benefit to having additional High Tech High schools in addition the two schools contemplated in this agreement, and that said additional schools could be located within the University Park and Research Center; and WHEREAS, at such time that the Lessee can demonstrate to the satisfaction ofthe City ofChula Vista that they have both the financial capacity and educational demand to construct additional schools, the City and High Tech High will negotiate in good faith to allow High Tech High to develop up to three additional schools on a maximum of six acres within the ultimate development of the University Park and Research Center; and WHEREAS, Lessee is a recognized public benefit corporation providing certain educational programs, services andlor other related services, programs and activities to the general public, including the citizens of the City; and WHEREAS, City hereby acknowledges said educational programs, services andlor activities provided by Lessee as valuable consideration received from Lessee in return for its use of said real property in accordance with the terms, covenants, conditions and provisions contained herein below; and WHEREAS, the Lessee partners with the business community to provide educational programs and work experience for its students, and intends to continue the practice of partnering with the business community in the schools considered in this agreement; and WHEREAS, High Tech High has received a Statewide Benefit charter which allows them to develop additional charter schools throughout the State of California; and I 13-11 CITY OF CHULA VISTA PROPERTY LEASE AGREEMENT WITH HTH LEARNING FOR PROPERTY AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE FUTURE INTERSECTION OF DISCOVERY FALLS DRIVE AND HUNTE PARKWAY (APN 643-070-10) WHEREAS, it is a target expectation of their Statewide charter, that forty percent of the students enrolled at future High Tech High schools be from low-income households; and WHEREAS, City will consider in good faith a request by Lessee for a Reimbursement Agreement for any oversizing of infrastructure improvements which benefit the University Park and Research Center. WHEREAS, this Lease supercedes all prior written and/or oral agreements, statements or other matters regarding said real property by and between City and Lessee. AGREEMENT NOW THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HERETO MUTUALLY AGREE AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1: USES 1.01 Premises. City hereby leases to Lessee, and Lessee takes and hires from City, subject to conditions hereinafter expressed, that certain real property, together with the buildings, improvements and appurtenances to be constructed and erected thereon by Lessee, situated in the City of Chula Vista, County of San Diego, State of California, generally known as HTH University Park, as described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by this reference made part of this Lease ("Development Plan"). Said real property is hereinafter called the "Demised Premises". The Demised Premises consists of approximately eight (8) acres. In addition, City hereby grants to Lessee the option to expand the Demised Premises ("Expansion Option") to include the following additional real property situated in the City ofChula Vista, County of San Diego, State of California: the first expansion area ("Expansion Area") consisting of approximately two (2) adjacent acres, as outlined and delineated on the Development Plan. Lessee may exercise the Expansion Option for the First Expansion Area by delivering written notice to City on or before January I, 2011. If Lessee exercises the Expansion Option, then the Expansion Area will become a part of the Demised Premises. If, at such time after the first Expansion Option is exercised, the Lessee demonstrates to the City that they have both the fmancial capacity and educational demand to construct additional schools, then Lessee may contact the City in writing on or before January 1,2014 and the City and High Tech High will negotiate in good faith to allow High Tech High to develop up to three additional schools on a maximum of six acres within the ultimate development of the University Park and Research Center If and when this event occurs, the City and the Lessee agree to conduct further environmental review, as necessary. 2 13-12 CITY OF CHULA VISTA PROPERTY LEASE AGREEMENT WITH HTH LEARNING FOR PROPERTY AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE FUTURE INTERSECTION OF DISCOVERY FALLS DRIVE AND HUNTE PARKWAY (APN 643-1170-10) 1.02 Uses. It is expressly agreed that the Demised Premises is leased to Lessee solely and exclusively for the purpose of constructing, erecting, installing, maintaining and operating public educational facilities, appurtenances, and providing educational and other related activities and programs to tbe general public, the elements of which are described in Exhibit "B." Any addition, alteration, deletion, deviation or removal of said facilities and appurtenances made to accommodate a change in use of the facilities shall fIrst be approved by the Chula Vista City Council. Lessee shall be allowed to make alterations, additions, and improvements as it deems necessary for the operation of public educational facilities and related activities and programs. Lessee covenants and agrees to use the Demised Premises for the above-specifIed purposes and to diligently pursue said purposes throughout tbe term hereof. Failure by Lessee to meet the construction schedule contained in Section 6.02 ofthis Lease, to continuously use the Demised Premises for said purposes (subject to Section 8.05), or the use thereof for purposes not expressly authorized herein, which failure continues beyond the applicable notice and cure period, shall be grounds for the termination of this Lease by City. Notwithstanding the above, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista has not reviewed or approved the project referred to herein. Nothing contained within this document shall be construed as a representation that tbe City will ultimately approve the project. Furtber, the City retains full discretion as to all matters as required bylaw. 1.03 Related Discretionarv Actions. By the granting of this Lease, neither City nor the Chula Vista City Council is obligating itselfto any other governmental agent, board, commission, or agency with regard to any otber discretionary action relating to development or operation of the Demised Premises. Discretionary action includes, but is not limited to rezoning, variances, conditional use permits, environmental clearances or any other governmental agency approvals that may be required for the development and operation of the Demised Premises. Failure to obtain all necessary approvals by the City or any other required agency consistent with the time frames set forth in Section 6.02 shall result in the termination of this Lease. 1.04 Ouiet Possession. Lessee shall at all times during the term peaceably and quietly have, hold and enjoy the Demised Premises. 1.05 Reservation. City reserves the right to allow the use of other City owned land in the proximity oftbe Demised Premises by other educational providers as set forth in Section 8.04 of this Lease. However, City shall not unreasonably or materially interfere with Lessee's use of the Demised Premises. 1.06 Reimbursement for Oversized Infrastructure. City will use reasonable efforts to cause other parties to enter into a reimbursement agreement for any oversized facilities. SECTION 2: TERM 2.01 Commencement. The term of tbis Lease shall be fifty (50) years commencing on the date that all discretionary actions are approved by tbe Chula Vista City Council. Should tbe City Council not approve the ultimate development of tbe site, tbe lease shall become null and void, and no damages or liabilities shall result. 3 13-13 CITY OF CHULA VISTA PROPERTY LEASE AGREEMENT WITH HTH LEARNING FOR PROPERTY AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE FUTURE INTERSECTION OF DISCOVERY FALLS DRIVE AND HUNTE PARKWAY (APN 643-070-10) 2.02 Renewal Option. At the end of the initial term of this Lease, Lessee has the option to renew this agreement for two (2) additional and successive twenty-five-(25) year period. This option may be exercised by providing written notice to the City at least one hundred and eighty (180) days prior to the expiration of the term or renewal period of this Lease. The renewal of this Lease as provided hereunder shall require the approval of the Chula Vista City Council. The Chula Vista City Council retains full and unfettered discretion as to all matters associated with the potential renewal of this agreement. 2.03 Holdover. Lessee shall have no rights of holding over after expiration or termination of this Lease. The occupancy of the Demised Premises by Lessee after the expiration or termination of this Lease constitutes a month-to-month tenancy. In the event of a holdover by Lessee, City shall have the right to terminate the holdover tenancy at will. 2.04 Ouitclaim of Lessee's Interest. On termination of this Lease for any reason, Lessee shall deliver to City a quitclaim deed in recordable form quitclaiming all its rights in and to the Demised Premises. On termination of this Lease for any reason, Lessee or its successor in interest shall deliver the same within five (5) days after receiving written demand therefor. City may record such deed only on the expiration or earlier termination of this Lease. 2.05 Surrender of Demised Premises. At the expiration or earlier termination of this Lease, at the City's sole discretion and option, the Lessee shall either surrender the Demised Premises, including all buildings, replacements, changes, additions, and improvements constructed or placed by Lessee thereon, except all personal property, equipment, machinery, trade fIXtures and temporary installations installed by Lessee, to City, or shall deliver the site free and clear of all structures and improvements to the City. Lessee shall have the right to place and install personal property, trade fIXtures, equipment and other temporary installations in and upon the Demised Premises, and fasten the same to the Demised Premises. All personal property, equipment, machinery, trade fIXtures and temporary installations, whether acquired by Lessee at the commencement of the Lease term or placed or installed on the Demised Premises by Lessee thereafter, shall remain Lessee's property free and clear of any claim by City ("Lessee's Property''). Lessee shall have the right to remove the same at any time during the term of this Lease provided that Lessee shall repair, at Lessee's expense, all damage to the Demised Premises caused by such removal. Lessee shall deliver to City all plans, records, registers, and other papers and documents reasonably required for the proper maintenance of the Demised Premises. Lessee shall surrender the Demised Premises free and clear of all subtenancies, liens and encumbrances caused by Lessee. 2.06 Termination. This Lease may be terminated by the City in the event the Lessee fails to operate the schools as intended or the failure to provide the intended improvements to the Demised Premises as described in Exhibit B within the time frames indicated in Section 6.02 of this Lease, and such failure continues beyond the applicable notice and cure period. 4 13-14 CITY OF CHULA VISTA PROPERTY LEASE AGREEMENT WITH HTH LEARNING FOR PROPERTY AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE FUTURE INTERSECTION OF DISCOVERY FALLS DRIVE AND HUNTE PARKWAY (APN 643-070-10) Lessee, for itself and its successors and assigns, agrees that during the occupancy and use of the Subject Premises, Lessee will, with respect to its development and operation of the Subject Premises, comply with Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of1964, as amended; the Civil Rights Act of 1991; the CalifomiaConstitution; the California Fair Employment and Housing Act; the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990; and any other applicable federal, state, or local laws and regulations now existing or hereinafter enacted, requiring equal employment opportunities or prohibiting discrimination. This shall include without limitation, laws and regulations prohibiting discrimination because of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, ancestry, physical or mental disability, veteran status, medical condition, marital status, age, sexual orientation, pregnancy, or other non-job related criteria. In complying with all such laws, including without limitation the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, and regulations promulgated thereunder, Lessee shall be solely responsible for such compliance and required programs, and there shall be no allocation of any such responsibility between City and Lessee. Lessee's compliance with this Section is an express condition hereof, and any failure by Lessee to so comply and perform shall be a default as provided in this Lease, and Lessor may exercise any right as provided herein, and as otherwise provided by law. City shall not be liable, monetarily or in any other way, to Lessee for exercising its rights to terminate this Lease. SECTION 3: RENT 3.01 Rent. City hereby agrees that the construction, operation and maintenance of the improvements to be made on the Demised Premises by Lessee, the establishment of a public charter school at the Demised Premises are valuable consideration received from Lessee, that the provision of such public charter school shall constitute all the rent to be paid by Lessee for its use of the Demised Premises in accordance with the terms, covenants, conditions and provisions of this Lease. Lessee shall not be required to pay any monetary rent to City for its use and occupation of the Demised Premises. For convenience only, consideration as set forth in this Section 3 may be referred to as rent. 3.02 Annual Proe:ram Reoort. As additional consideration, Lessee shall be required to make available to the City, upon request, copies of the armual audit required under the California Education Code. 3.03 Insoection of Records. Lessee agrees to make any and all records and accounts pertaining to Lessee's compliance with this Lease available to City for inspection at all reasonable times. These records and accounts will be made available by Lessee at the Demised Premises. Lessee shall maintain all such records and accounts for a minimum period of five (5) years. The provisions of this Section 3.03 shall survive the expiration or termination of this Lease. SECTION 4: ASSIGNMENT 5 13-15 CITY OF CHULA VISTA PROPERTY LEASE AGREEMENT WITH HTH LEARNING FOR PROPERTY AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE FUTURE INTERSECTION OF DISCOVERY FALLS DRIVE AND HUNTE PARKWA Y (APN 643-070-10) 4.01 Time is of Essence: Provisions Bindinl! on Successors. Time is of the essence of all of the terms, covenants and conditions of this Lease and, except as otherwise provided herein, all of the terms, covenants and conditions of this Lease shall apply to, benefit and bind the successors and assigns of the respective parties, jointly and individually. However, City or Lessee shall incur no liability to the other with respect to and shall not be responsible for any failure to perform any of such party's obligations hereunder ifsuch failure is caused by any reason beyond the reasonable control of such party including, but not limited to, strike, obtaining of permits or approvals, governmental rule, regulations, ordinances, statutes or interpretation, or by frre, earthquake, civil commotion, or failure or disruption of utility services ("Force Majeure"). The amount of time to perform any of a party's obligations shall be extended by the amount of time such party is delayed in performing such obligation by reason of any Force Majeure occurrence whether similar to or different from any of the foregoing types of occurrences; provided, however, in no event will an extension of time be permitted for any delays due to frnancial inability to perform. 4.02 Assil!nment and Sublettinl!. Except to schools that are governed within the family of corporations operated by HTH Learning and to outside entities providing educational and related services that are supplemental to HTH's educational programs, Lessee shall not assign this Lease, or any interest therein without City's prior written consent. Lessee shall be permitted without consent to assign this Lease or to sublet the Demised Premises or any part thereof, or any right or privilege appurtenant thereto, to schools that are governed within the family of corporations operated by HTH Learning and to outside entities that are providing educational and related activities that are supplemental to HTH's programs. The supplemental and related activities and programs may include, but are not limited to, pre-school, childcare, adult-education, food services, tutoring, sports, research, performing arts, and fundraising. A consent to assignment, subletting, occupation or use by any other person shall not be deemed to be a consent to any subsequent assignment, subletting, occupation or use by another person. Except as permitted above, any such assignment or subletting without such consent shall be void. Approval of any assignment or sublease shall be conditioned upon the assignee or sublessee agreeing in writing that it will assume or be subject to the rights and obligations thereby assigned or subleased and that it will keep and perform all covenants, conditions and provisions of this agreement which are applicable to the rights acquired. 4.03 Encumbrance. Subject to prior written consent by City, which shall not be unreasonably withheld, Lessee may encumber this Lease, its leasehold estate and its improvements thereon by deed of trust, mortgage, chattel mortgage or other security instrument to assure the payment of indebtedness of Lessee, upon the express .condition that the net proceeds of such loan or loans be devoted exclusively to the purpose of developing and/or improving the Demised Premises. However, a portion of the loan proceeds may be disbursed for payment of incidental costs of construction, including but not limited to the following: off-site improvements for service of the Demised Premises; on-site improvements; escrow charges; premiums for hazard insurance, or other insurance or bonds required by City; title insurance premiums; loan costs such as discounts, interest and commissions; and architectural, engineering and attorney's fees and such other normal expenses incidental to such construction. 6 13-16 CITY OF CHULA VISTA PROPERTY LEASE AGREEMENT WITH HTH LEARNING FOR PROPERTY AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE FUTURE INTERSECTION OF DISCOVERY FALLS DRIVE AND HUNTE PARKWAY (APN 643-070-10) Any subsequent encumbrances on the Demised Premises shall also be for the exclusive purpose of development of the Demised Premises; provided, however, after the Demised Premises are completed in accordance with the Development Plan, proceeds from refmancing or from such subsequent encumbrances may be used for any purpose. In the event any such approved deed of trust or mortgage or other security type of instrument should at any time be in default and be foreclosed, or transferred in lieu of foreclosure, the City will accept the approved mortgagee or beneficiary thereof; as its new tenant under this Lease with all the rights, privileges and duties granted and imposed in this Lease. Upon prior written approval by City, which will not be unreasonably withheld, said mortgagee or beneficiary may assign this Lease to its nominee. Any deed of trust, mortgage or other security instrument shall be subject to all of the terms, covenants and conditions of this Lease and shall not be deemed to amend or alter any of the terms, covenants or conditions hereof. 4.04 Defaults aud Remedies. a. Default. In the event that Lessee shall default in the performance of any covenant or condition required by this Lease to be performed by Lessee and shall fail to cure said default within thirty (30) days following written notice thereof from City; or ifany such default is not reasonably curable within thirty (30) days, shall fail to commence to cure the default(s) within said thirty (30) day period and diligently pursue such cure to completion, then City may, at its option, without further notice or demand upon Lessee or upon any person claiming rights through Lessee, immediately terminate this Lease and all rights of Lessee and of all persons claiming rights through Lessee to the Demised Premises or to possession thereof; and City may enter and take possession of the Demised Premises. In the event that there is a deed of trust, mortgage or other security interest on Lessee's leasehold interest, City shall give the mortgagee or beneficiary written notice of the default(s) complained of, and the same mortgagee or beneficiary shall have thirty (30) days from such notice to cure the default(s) or, if any such default is not curable within thirty (30) days, to commence to cure the default(s) and diligently pursue such cure to completion. The thirty-day period will be extended during such time as mortgagee or beneficiary or other party is pursuing its foreclosure or other remedies against Lessee. b. Lender Rights. Should the defau1t(s) be not curable by Lessee, then any lender holding a interest in the leasehold permitted by Section 4.03, shall have the absolute right to substitute itself to the estate of Lessee hereunder. If such mortgagee or beneficiary shall give notice in writing of its election to so substitute itself within the thirty-day period after receiving written notice by City of the default, and the default, if curable, is cured by such mortgagee or beneficiary, then this Lease shall not terminate pursuant to the default. In that event, City expressly consents to the substitution and authorizes the mortgagee or beneficiary to perform under this Lease with all the rights, privileges, and obligations of Lessee, subject to cure of the default, to the extent reasonably possible, by mortgagee or beneficiary. Lessee expressly agrees to assign all its interest in and to its leasehold estate to mortgagee or beneficiary in that event. 7 13-17 CITY OF CHULA VISTA PROPERTY LEASE AGREEMENT WITH HTH LEARNING FOR PROPERTY AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE FUTURE INTERSECTION OF DISCOVERY FALLS DRIVE AND HUNTE PARKWAY (APN 643-070-10) c. Abandonment. If Lessee has breached the Lease beyond the applicable notice and cure period and abandoned the Demised Premises, this Lease shall terminate upon such abandonment, and City may enforce all its rights and remedies hereunder, including but not limited, to the right to reenter upon the Demised Premises and take possession of all buildings, improvements, equipment and appurtenances thereto, provided that Lessee shall have the right to remove Lessee's Property. d. Waiver. Any waiver of a default is not a waiver of any other default. Any waiver of a default must be in writing and be executed by the City Manager in order to constitute a valid and binding waiver. Delay or failure to exercise a remedy or right is not a waiver of that or any other remedy or right under this Lease. The use of one remedy or right for any default does not waive the use of another remedy or right for the same default or for another or later default. City and Lessee specifically agree that the property constituting the Demised Premises is City-owned and held in trust for the benefit of the citizens of the City ofChula Vista and that any failure by the City Manager or City staff to discover a default or take prompt action to require the cure of any default shall not result in an equitable estoppel, but City shall at all times, subjectto applicable statute of limitations, have the legal right to require the cure of any default when and as such defaults are discovered or when and as the City Council directs the City Manager to take action or require the cure of any default after such default is brought to the attention of the City Council by the City Manager or by any concerned citizen. 4.05 Eminent Domain. If all or part of the Demised Premises is taken through condemnation proceedings or under threat of condemnation by any public authority with the power of eminent domain, the interests of City and Lessee (or beneficiary or mortgagee) will be as follows: a. Total Taking. In the event the entire Demised Premises are taken, this Lease shall terminate on the date of the transfer oftitle or possession to the condemning authority, whichever first occurs. b. Partial Taking. In the event of a partial taking, if, in the opinion of Lessee the remaining part of the Demised Premises is unsuitable for Lessee's operation, this Lease shall terminate on the date of the transfer oftitle or possession to the condemning authority, whichever fITst occurs. In the event of a partial taking, if, in the opinion of Lessee the remainder of the Demised Premises is suitable for Lessee's continued operation, this Lease shall terminate in regard to the portion taken on the date of the transfer of title or possession to the condemning authority, whichever fITst occurs, but shall continue for the portion not taken. c. Award. All monies awarded in any such taking shall belong to City, whether such taking results in diminution in value of the leasehold or the fee or both; provided, however, Lessee shall be entitled to any award attributable to the taking of or damages to Lessee's Property or Lessee's then remaining leasehold interest in installations and improvements of Lessee. City shall have no liability to Lessee for any award not provided by the condemning authority. d. Transfer. City has the right to transfer City's interests in the Demised Premises in lieu of condemnation to any authority entitled to exercise the power of eminent domain. If a transfer occurs, Lessee shall retain whatever interest it may have in the fair market value of any improvements placed by it on the Demised Premises in accordance with this Lease. 8 13-18 CITY OF CHUU VISTA PROPERTY LEASE AGREEMENT WITH HTH LEARNING FOR PROPERTY AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE FUTURE INTERSECTION OF DISCOVERY FALLS DRIVE AND HUNTE PARKWAY (APN 643-070-10) e. No Inverse Condemnation. The exercise of any City right under this Lease shall not be interpreted as an exercise of the power of eminent domain and shall not impose any liability upon City for inverse condemnation. SECTION 5: INSURA./IlCE RISKS/SECURITY 5.01 Indemnitv.. Lessee shall defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, its elected and appointed officers and employees ("City Parties"), from and against all claims for damages, liability, cost and expense, including without limitation attorneys fees, ("Claims") arising out of or alleged by third parties to be the result of the negligent acts, errors or omissions or the willful misconduct of the Lessee, and Lessee's employees, subcontractors or other persons, agencies or fInns for whom Lessee is legally responsible in connection with the use of the Demised Premises, including but not limited to expenses incurred in legal actions, death, injury, or damage to the extent caused directly or indirectly by: a. Condition. Any unsafe or defective condition in or on the Demised Premises of any nature whatsoever which may exist by reason of any act, omission, neglect, or any use or occupation of the Demised Premises by Lessee; or b. Operation. Any operation, use, or occupation conducted on the Demised Premises by Lessee; or c. Negligence. Any act, omission, or negligence on the part of Lessee, its employees, agents, sublessees, invitees, licensees; or d. Compliance. Any failure by Lessee to comply or secure compliance with any of the Lease terms or conditions. However, Lessee shall not be required to relieve, indemnify, protect, or save any of the City Parties for any Claims arising from the sole willful misconduct of the City Parties, any Claims arising prior to the date of this Lease or any Claims relating to hazardous substance or materials present on, under or near the Demised Premises prior to the Date of this Lease. 5.02 Insurance. Lessee must procure insurance against claims for injuries to persons or damages to property that may arise from or in connection with the Lessee's operation and use of the leased premises. The insurance must be maintained for the duration of the contract. The cost of such insurance shall be borne by the Lessee. Minimum Scope of Insurance Coverage must be at least as broad as: 9 13-19 CITY OF CHULA VISTA PROPERTY LEASE AGREEMENT WITH HTH LEARNING FOR PROPERTY AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE FUTURE INTERSECTION OF DISCOVERY FALLS DRIVE AND HUNTE PARKWAY (APN643-070-10) 1. Insurance Services Office Commercial General Liability coverage (occurrence Form CGOOO I) 2. Workers' Compensation insurance as required by the State of California and Employer's Liability Insurance, if applicable. 3. Property insurance against all risks of loss to any tenant improvements or betterments, if applicable. Minimum Limits ofInsurance Lessee must maintain limits no less than: I. General Liability: (Including operations, products and completed operations, as applicable.) 2. Workers' Compensation Employer's Liability: where applicable 3. Property Insurance $1,000,000 per occurrence for bodily injury, personal injury and property damage. If Commercial General Liability insurance with a general aggregate limit is used, either the general aggregate limit must apply separately to this projecVlocation or the general aggregate limit must be twice the required occurrence limit. Statutory $1,000,000 each accident $1,000,000 disease-policy limit $1,000,000 disease-each employee Full Replacement Cost with no coinsurance penalty provision, where applicable Deductibles and Self-Insured Retentions Any deductibles or self-insured retentions must be declared to and approved by the City. At the option ofthe City, either the insurer will reduce or eliminate such deductibles or self-insured retentions as they pertain to the City, its officers, officials, employees and volunteers; or the Lessee will provide a fmancial guarantee satisfactory to the City guaranteeing payment of losses and related investigations, claim administration, and defense expenses. Other Insurance Provisions The general liability, and where appropriate, the Worker's Compensation policies are to contain, or be endorsed to contain, the following provisions: I. The City ofChula Vista, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers are to be named as additional insureds with respect to liability arising out of ownership, maintenance or use of that part of the premises leased to the lessee. The General liability Additional Insured coverage must be provided in the form of an endorsement to the Lessee's insurance using ISO CG201 0 (10/01) or its equivalent. 10 13-20 CITY OF CHULA VISTA PROPERTY LEASE AGREEMENT WITH HTH LEARI\'ING FOR PROPERTY AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE FUTURE INTERSECTION OF DISCOVERY FALLS DRIVE AND HUNTE PARKWA Y (APN 643-070-10) 2. For any claims related to a project, the Lessee's insurance coverage must be primary insurance as it pertains to the City, its officers, officials, employees, agents, and volunteers. Any insurance or self-insurance maintained by the City, its officers, officials, employees, or volunteers is wholly separate from the insurance of the lessee and in no way relieves the lessee from its responsibility to provide insurance. 3. Each insurance policy required by this clause must be endorsed to state that coverage will not be canceled by either party, except after thirty (30) days' prior written notice to the City by certified mail, return receipt requested. 4. Coverage shall not extend to any indemnity coverage for the active negligence of the additional insured in any case where an agreement to indemnify the additional insured would be invalid under Subdivision (b) of Section 2782 of the Civil Code. 5. Lessee's insurer will provide a Waiver of Subrogation in favor of the City for each required policy providing coverage during the life of this contract. Acceptability of Insurers Insurance is to be placed with licensed insurers admitted to transact business in the State of California with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A V. If insurance is placed with a Surplus Lines insurer, insurer must be listed on the State of California List of Eligible Surplus Lines Insurers (LESLI) with a current A.M. Best's rating of no less than A: X. Exception may be made for the State Compensation Fund when not specifically rated. Verification of Coverage Lessee must furnish the City with original certificates and amendatory endorsements effecting coverage required by this clause. The endorsements should be on forms provided by the City or on insurance industry forms, provided those endorsements or policies conform to the requirements. All certificates and endorsements are to be received and approved by the City before work commences. The City reserves the right to require, at any time, complete, certified copies of all required insurance policies, including endorsements evidencing the coverage required by these specifications. Accident Reports Lessee shall make available to City upon request a report of any accident causing more than TEN TIIOUSAND DOLLARS ($10,000) worth of property damage or any serious injury to persons on the Demised Premises. This report shall contain, to the extent available, the names and addresses of the parties involved, a statement of the circumstances, the date and hour, the names and addresses of any witnesses and other pertinent information. 11 13-21 CITY OF CHULA VISTA PROPERTY LEASE AGREEMENT WITH HTH LEARNING FOR PROPERTY AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE FUTURE INTERSECTION OF DISCOVERY FALLS DRIVE AND HUNTE PARKWAY (APN 643-070-10) Failure to Comply If Lessee fails or refuses to take out and maintain the required insurance, or fails to provide the proof of coverage, City has the right to obtain the insurance. Lessee shall reimburse City for the premiums paid with interest at the maximum allowable legal rate then in effect in California. City shall give notice of the payment of premiums within thirty (30) days of payment stating the amount paid, names of the insurer(s) and rate of interest. Said reimbursement and interest shall be paid by Lessee on the fIrst (1st) day of the month following the notice of payment by City. 5.03 Waste. Damae:e. or Destruction. Lessee agrees to give notice to City of any frre or other damage that may occur on the Demised Premises within ten (10) days of such fIre or damage. Lessee agrees not to commit or suffer to be committed any waste or injury or any public or private nuisance. SECTION 6: IMPROVEMENTS/ALTERATIONS/REPAlRS 6.01 Acceptance of Demised Premises. By signing this Lease, Lessee represents and warrants that it has independently inspected the Demised Premises and made all tests, investigations, and observations necessary to satisfY itself of the condition of the Demised Premises. Lessee agrees it is relying solely on such independent inspection, tests, investigations, and observations in making this Lease. Lessee further acknowledges that the Demised Premises are in the condition called for by this Lease, that City has performed all work with respect to the Demised Premises, and that Lessee does not hold City responsible for any defects in the Demised Premises. 6.02 Improvements/Alterations. Lessee may make any improvements or alterations to or on the Demised Premises in connection with its permitted use under this Lease. This Lease is executed with the understanding and agreement that Lessee is obligated to construct and make certain improvements to the Demised Premises. Lessee covenants and agrees that the buildings, facilities, improvements and appurtenances thereto must be constructed and paid for wholly at the expense of Lessee. Before cornmencing the construction of any improvements on the Demised Premises, Lessee agrees that they will obtain fmancing and received all applicable governmental approvals, and upon request, it will furnish evidence, satisfactory to City, that it has arranged for fmancing so that at all times there will be available to Lessee sufficient funds to pay for the cost of construction of the proposed improvements. a. Construction Documents. Lessee, at its own expense, shall cause plans and specifIcations to be prepared for the improvements to the Demised Premises. Upon request, Lessee shall make available for City inspection, a copy of any written construction agreement with a State of California, licensed general contractor which Lessee proposes to execute (or, if no general contractor will be used, a copy of each proposed written agreement with the various subcontractors). 12 13-22 CITY OF CHULA VISTA PROPERTY LEASE AGREEMENT WITH HTH LEARNING FOR PROPERTY AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE FUTURE INTERSECTION OF DISCOVERY FALLS DRIVE AND HUNTE PARKWAY (APN 643-070-10) b. Construction. After receiving all applicable discretionary approvals and building permits, Lessee shall diligently pursue construction of the improvements. Lessee will use reasonable efforts to commence such construction on or before January I, 2009. Subject to Force Majeure, if Lessee shall neglect, fail or refuse to commence its work as aforesaid and thereafter neglects, fails or refuses to diligently proceed with and complete its work, then, subject to the notice and cure period set forth in Section 4.04, City may declare this Lease cancelled and of no further force and effect. If Lessee exercises the Expansion Option(s), Lessee will use reasonable efforts to commence construction of the improvements for the First Expansion Area on or before January 1,2013. Subject to Force Majeure, if Lessee shall neglect, fail or refuse to commence its work on either Expansion Area as aforesaid and thereafter neglects, fails or refuses to diligently proceed with and complete its work, then, subject to the notice and cure period set forth in Section 4.04, City may declare that the Expansion Area is no longer part of the Demised Premises and this Lease shall be cancelled and of no further force and effect for that Expansion Area although it will remain in effect for the Demised Premises. c. Completion Documents. Within ninety (90) days of receiving the certificate of occupancy for the improvements, Lessee shall keep on record for City's inspection: (I) A statement of completion by the architect who supervised the construction, which shall state that all work, has been completed substantially in accordance with the approved plans and specifications. (2) Copies of the certificate of occupancy, or any equivalent permit or certificate which any governmental authority may require. d. As-Built Plans. Within ninety (90) days of receiving the certificate of occupancy for the improvements, Lessee shall furnish and submit to City a reproducible set of plans showing the as-built condition of all improvements made to, in or upon the Demised Premises and certified by the plan's preparer that the as-built conditions are depicted accurately. 6.03 Entry and Inspection. City reserves and shall always have the right to enter said Demised Premises during reasonable times after reasonable prior notice to Lessee for the purpose of viewing and ascertaining the condition of the same, or to protect its interests in the Demised Premises, or to inspect the operations conducted thereon. City shall comply with all reasonable security requirements of Lessee. In the event that such entry or inspection by City discloses that said Demised Premises are not in a safe, healthy, and sanitary condition, and if Lessee does not cure such matter within ten (10) days after written notice to Lessee (or, if such matter cannot be reasonably cured with such period, such longer period as may be reasonably necessary so long as Lessee diligently proceeds to cure the matter), City shall have the right to have any necessary maintenance or repair work done at the expense of Lessee, and Lessee hereby agrees to pay promptly any and all costs incurred by City in having such necessary maintenance or repair work done, in order to keep said Demised Premises in a safe, healthy, and sanitary condition. Failure of the Lessee to pay all costs incurred by the City within thirty (30) days of receiving notice of such cost shall be deemed a material breach and the City may terminate this Lease Agreement. 13 13-23 CITY OF CHULA VISTA PROPERTY LEASE AGREEMENT WITH HTH LEARNING FOR PROPERTY AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE FUTURE INTERSECTION OF DISCOVERY FALLS DRIVE AND HUNTE PARKWAY (APN 643-070-10) 6.04 Maintenance. Lessee agrees to assume full responsibility and cost for the operation and maintenance of the Demised Premises throughout the term of this Lease. Lessee will maintain the Demised Premises in compliance with all applicable health and safety laws, ordinances, rules and regulations of governmental agencIes. 6.05 Utilities. Lessee agrees to order, obtain, and pay for all utilities and services and installation charges in connection with the development and operation of the Demised Premises. 6.06 Liens. Lessee shall at all times save City free and harmless and indemnify City against all claims for labor and materials in connection with Lessee's operations, improvements, alterations, or repairs on or to the Demised Premises and the costs of defending against such claims, including reasonable attorney's fees. If improvements, alterations, or repairs are made to the Demised Premises by or on behalf of Lessee, and a lien or notice of lien is filed, Lessee shall within fifteen (15) days of such filing either: a. Take all actions necessary to record a valid release of lien; or b. Record a bond sufficient to remove the effect of the lien from the Demised Premises. 6.07 Taxes. Lessee agrees to pay, before delinquency, all real property taxes and assessments, if any, assessed or levied upon Lessee or the Demised Premises, including the land, any buildings, structures, machines, equipment, appliances, or other improvements or property of any nature whatsoever erected, installed, or maintained by Lessee or levied by reason of the business or other Lessee activities related to the Demised Premises, including any licenses or permits. However, the City acknowledge that Lessee asserts it is exempt from such taxes. 6.08 Silms. Lessee agrees not to erect or display any banners, pennants, flags, posters, signs, decorations, marquees, awnings, or similar devices or advertising that are prohibited by laws, ordinances, rules or regulations. If any such unauthorized item is found on the Demised Premises, Lessee agrees to remove the item at its expense within 24 hours notice thereof by City, or City may thereupon remove the item at Lessee's cost. Failure of the Lessee to pay all costs incurred by the City within thirty (30) days of receiving notice of such cost shall be deemed a material breach and the City may terminate this Lease Agreement. 6.09 Ownership oflmprovements and Personal Prooertv. a. Title in the portion of the Demised Premises consisting of land shall at all times remain in City. Lessee will retain ownership of the buildings, improvements, and fixtures bought or constructed or placed on the Demised Premises until the expiration or termination of this Lease. Lessee's interests in the Demised Premises shall not ripen into a fee ownership. In addition, Lessee shall at all times be the owner of Lessee's Property. 14 13-24 CITY OF CHULA VISTA PROPERTY LEASE AGREEMENT WITH HTH LEARNING FOR PROPERTY AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE FUTURE INTERSECTION OF DISCOVERY FALLS DRIVE AND HUNTE PARKWA Y (APN 643-1)70-10) b. Per Section 2.05 above, to the extent the improvements, structures and installations made by Lessee are not in useable condition, Lessee shall remove all such improvements, structures and installations as directed in writing by City at Lessee's sole cost on or before Lease expiration or termination. lfLessee fails to remove any improvements, structures, and installations as directed., Lessee agrees to pay City the actual and reasonable cost of any removal. c. Lessee's Property shall be removed by Lessee by the date of the expiration or termination of this Lease. Any said items which Lessee fails to remove within thirty (30) days after written notice will be considered abandoned and become City's property free of all claims and liens, or City may, at its option, remove said items at Lessee's expense. d. If any removal of Lessee's Property results in damage to the remaining improvements on the Demised Premises, Lessee agrees to repair such damage or pay for repairs conducted by City, at City's option. SECTION 7: GENERAL PROVISIONS 7.01 Notices. a. Any notice required or permitted to be given hereunder shall be in writing and may be served personally or by United States Mail, postage prepaid, addressed as follows: To Lessee: HTH Learning 2861 Womble Road San Diego, CA 92106-6025 Attn: Chief Operating Officer and General Counsel To City: City of Chula Vista City Manager 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 and to any mortgagee, trustee, or beneficiary as applicable, at such appropriate address designated in writing by the respective party. b. Any party entitled or required to receive notice under this Lease may by like notice designate a different address to which notices shall be sent. 15 13-25 CITY OF CHULA VISTA PROPERTY LEASE AGREEMENT WITH HTH LEARNING FOR PROPERTY AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE FUTURE INTERSECTION OF DISCOVERY FALLS DRNE AND HUNTE PARKWAY (APN 643-070-10) 7.02 ComDliance with Law. Lessee shall at all times in the construction, maintenance, occupancy, and operation of the Demised Premises comply with all applicable laws, statutes, ordinances, and regulations of City, County, State, and Federal Governments relating to Lessee's use, at Lessee's sole cost and expense, whether or not said laws are expressly stated or referred to herein. . 7.03 City ADDroval. The approval or consent of City, wherever required in this Lease, shall mean the written approval or consent of the City Manager unless otherwise specified, without need for furtherresolution by the City Council. The City Manager shall be the City's authorized representative in the interpretation and enforcement of all work performed in connection with this Lease. The City Manager may delegate authority in connection with this Lease to the City Manager's designee(s). 7.04 Interpretation of Lease. The interpretation, validity and enforcement of the Lease shall be governed by and construed under the laws of the State of California. The Lease does not limit any other rights or remedies available to City. Nothing contained in this Lease shall be deemed or construed to create the relationship of principal and agent or of partnership or of joint-venture or of any association whatsoever between City and Lessee, it being expressly understood and agreed that neither the computation of rent nor any other provisions contained in this Lease nor any act or acts of the parties hereto shall be deemed to create any relationship between City and Lessee other than the relationship of landlord and tenant. The reference contained to successors and assigns of Lessee is not intended to constitute a consent to assignment by Lessee, but has reference only to those instances in which City may have given written consent to a particular assignment. This Lease shall inure to the benefit of and be binding upon the parties hereto and their respective legal representatives, successors and permitted assigns. 7.05 Nondiscrimination. Lessee covenants by and for itself and any successors in interest (and each Lessee successor) that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of any person or group of persons on account of race, color, creed, religion, sex, marital status, physical or mental disability or medical condition, national origin or ancestry in the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure or enjoyment of the Property, nor shall Lessee itself or any person claiming under or through it establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection, location, number, use or occupancy oftenants, lessees, subtenants, sublessees or vendees of the Property. The foregoing covenants shall run with the land. A. All deeds, leases or contracts with respect to the Demised Premises shall contain or be subject to substantially the following nondiscrimination or nonsegregation clauses: I. In deeds: "The grantee herein covenants by and for itself, its successors and assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, that there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of, any person or group of persons on account of sex, marital status, race, color, creed, religion, national origin or ancestry in the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure or enjoyment of the land herein conveyed, nor shall the grantee itself or any person claiming under or through it, establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the 16 13-26 CITY OF CHULA VISTA PROPERTY LEASE AGREEMENT WITH HTH LEARNING FOR PROPERTY AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE FUTURE INTERSECTION OF DISCOVERY FALLS DRIVE AND HUNTE P ARKW A Y (APN 643-070-10) selection, location, number, use or occupancy of tenants, lessees, subtenants, sublessees or vendees in the land herein conveyed. The foregoing covenants shall run with the land." 2. In leases: "The lessee herein covenants by and for itself, its successors and assigns, and all persons claiming under or through them, and this lease is made and accepted upon and subject to the following conditions: That there shall be no discrimination against or segregation of any person or group of persons, on account of sex, marital status, race, color, creed, religion, national origin or ancestry in the leasing, subleasing, renting, transferring, use, occupancy, tenure or enjoyment of the land herein leased, nor shall lessee itself, or any person claiming under or through it, establish or permit such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with reference to the selection, location, number, use or occupancy of tenants, lessees, sublessees, subtenants or vendees in the land herein leased." 3. In contracts: "There shall be no discrimination against or segregation of any person or group of persons on account of sex, marital status, race, color, religion, creed, national origin or ancestry in the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure or enjoyment of the land, nor shall the transferee itself or any person claiming under or through it, establish or permit any such practice or practices of discrimination or segregation with Reference to the selection, location, number, use or occupancy of tenants, lessees, subtenants, sub lessees or vendees of the land." 7.06 Partial Invaliditv. Should any term, covenant, condition, or provision herein be found or deemed to be invalid, void, or unenforceable by a court of competent jurisdiction, the Lease shall be construed as not containing such provision, and all other provisions which are otherwise lawful shall remain in full force and effect, and to this end the provisions ofthis Lease are severable. 7.07 Lel!al Fees. In the event of any litigation regarding this Lease, the prevailing party shall be entitled to an award ofreasonabJe legal costs, including court and attorney's fees. 7.08 Number and Gender. Words of any gender used in this Lease shall include any other gender, and words in the singular number shall include the plural, when the tense requires. 7.9 Captions. The Lease outline, section headings, and captions for various articles and paragraphs shall not be held to defme, limit, augment, or describe the scope, content, or intent of any or all parts of this Lease. The numbers of the paragraphs and pages of this Lease may not be consecutive. Such lack of consecutive numbers is intentional and shall have no effect on the enforceability of this Lease. 17 13-27 CITY OF CHULA VISTA PROPERTY LEASE AGREEMENT WITH HTH LEARNING FOR PROPERTY AT THE SOUTHEAST CORNER OF THE FUTURE INTERSECTION OF DISCOVERY FALLS DRIVE AND HUNTE PARKWAY (APN 643-070-10) 7.10 Entire Understandinl!. This Lease contains the entire understanding of the parties and supercedes any and all prior written and/or oral agreements, statements or other matters by and between City and Lessee regarding the Demised Premises. Lessee, by signing this Lease, agrees. that there is no other written or oral understanding between the parties with respect to the Demised Premises. Each party has relied on its own examination of the Demised Premises, advice from its own attorneys, and the warranties, representations, and covenants of the Lease itself. Each of the parties in this Lease agrees that no other party, agent, or attorney of any other party has made any promise, representation, or warranty, whatsoever which is not contained in this Lease. The failure or refusal of any party to read the Lease or other documents, inspect the Demised Premises, and obtain legal or other advice relevant to this transaction constitutes a waiver of any objection, contention, or claim that might have been based on these actions. No modification, amendment, or alteration of this Lease will be valid unless it is in writing and signed by all parties. 7.11 Additional Instruments to be Executed. The parties shall execute and deliver any instruments in writing necessary to carry out any agreement, term, condition, or assurance in this Lease whenever occasion shall arise and reasonable request for such instruments shall be made. SECTION 8: SPECIAL PROVISIONS 8.01 Ancillarv Uses and Services. No additional services, other than those provided under Section 1.02 of this Lease, shall be provided by Lessee from or at the Demised Premises, except as may be approved in writing by City. 8.02 Continued Occupancy. Lessee covenants and agrees to, and it is the intent of this Lease that the Lessee shall, continuously and uninterruptedly during the term of the Lease, occupy and use the Demised Premises for the purposes herein above specified, except (i) for closures consistent with the operation of a school, (ii) for closures during periods of remodeling, alterations, additions and/or repairs and (iii) while the Demised Premises are untenantable by reason of fire, flood, or other unavoidable casualty, and, in that event, City shall be promptly notified by Lessee. 8.03 Hazardous Substances. No goods, merchandise or material shall be kept, stored or sold in or on the Demised Premises which are in any way explosive or hazardous in violation of applicable laws; and no offensive or dangerous trade, business or occupation shall be carried on therein or thereon. No machinery or apparatus shall be used or operated on or about the Demised Premises which will in any way injure the Demised Premises or improvements thereon, or adjacent or other Demised Premises, or improvements thereon, or to persons. However, nothing contained in this section shall preclude Lessee from bringing, keeping or using on or about the Demised Premises such materials, supplies, equipment and machinery in connection with its permitted use of the Demised Premises. Open flame welding or burning, gasoline, or other fuel storage except in small quantities in connection with the use of the Demised Premises is expressly prohibited without prior written consent of the City. 18 13-28 CITY OF CHULA VISTA PROPERTY LEASE AGREEMENT WITH Hn! LEARNING FOR PROPERTY AT THE SOUTHEAST COlL'IIER OF THE FUTURE INTERSECTION OF DISCOVERY FALLS DRIVE AND HT.;NTE PARKWAY (APN 643.)70-10) 8.04 Exclusivirv. Except for the rights granted 10 Lessee pursual1lto this Lease, Lessee shall not have the exclusive right to provide educatIonal services at The University Park and Research Center. Lessee is aware that other educational facilities currently exist, and/or in the fUlUre may exist, and operate in close proximity to the Demised Premises, which provide or may provide educatiOn'll servkes and activities. SECTION 9: SIGNATURES 9.01 SiJ!nature Pal!e, The individuals executing this Lease represent and warrant that they have the right, power, legal capacity and authority to enter into and to exeCute this Lease On behalf of the respective legal entities of the Lessee and the City. IN WITNESS WHEREOF th~ parties hereto for themselves, their legal representarives, heirs, executors, adminisll'lltors, successors, and assigns do hereby agree to the full performance of the covenants herein comained and have caused Ihis Lease 10 be executed by selling hereumo their SignalUr~S on the day and year respeCtIvely written l1erein below. CITY: The City of ehula Vista Date BY: ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM: OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY City Manager BY: BY; City Anorney City Clerk LESSEE: HTH Learning Date: NOTARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF LESSEE'S SIGNATURE(S) MUST BE ATTACHED 19 13-29 Date 9/26/2006 IN 25-102119 EXHIBIT 'A' LEASE PARCELS Those certain parcels of land being portions of Lot 12 of Otay Rancho, in the City of Chula Vista, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 862, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County on February 7, 1900, described as follows: PARCEL 1 COMMENCING at the centerline intersection of Discovery Falls Drive and Hunte Parkway as shown on Chula Vista Tract No. 01-11 in the City of Chula Vista, County of San Diego, State of California, according to Map thereof No. 15233, filed in the Office of the County Recorder of San Diego County on December 28, 2005, thence along the centerline of said Hunte Parkway, North 48'26'26' East 48.00 feet; thence leaving said centerline, South 41'33'34' East 74.00 feet to a point on a line which is 74.00 feet southerly and parallel with said centerline, and the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; thence along said parallel line, North 48'26'26' East 513.25 feet; thence leaving said parallel line, South 41'33'34' East 10.00 feet; thence North 48'26'26' East 100.94 feet to Point 'A'; thence South 41'33'34' East 564.43 feet; thence South 48'26'26' West 526.00 feet to the southerly line of said Lot 12; thence along said southerly line South 71'57'39' West 96.18 feet; thence leaving said southerly line North 41'33'34' West 536.05 feet to the TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING: 8.037 acres, more or less. H:\PDA T A\25102119\ADMll'l\LEGAlS\2119LGLOl.DOC Page 1 of 2 9/26/2006 13-30 PARCEL 2 BEGINNING at previously mentioned Point 'A'; thence North 4S"26'26' East 129.52 feet; thence North 41"33'34' West 10.00 feet to a point on a line which is 74.00 feet southerly and parallel with said centerline of Hunte Parkway; thence along said parallel line, North 4S"26'26i East 78.70 feet; thence leaving said parallel line, South 41"33'34' East 574.43 feet; thence South 4S"26'26' West 20S.22 feet; thence North 41"33'34' West 564.43 feet to the POINT OF BEGINNING. CONTAINING: 2.716 acres, more or less. APN 643-070-10 SUBJECT TO all Covenants, Rights, Rights-of-Way and Easements of Record. This description was prepared by me or under my direction. I~;~(.t LI7351 License expires 12/31/2007 H:\PDA T A \251Q21 1 9\ADMIN\LEGALS\2 1 19LGLOl.DOC Page 2 oi2 912612006 13-31 P.O.C. T.P.O.B. '---- '---- C/J --I --I i1 >- es ;:. ~ .... a '---- ~ .... ~ T1 ,- , N' ...! '" o ~ '" . . ... ,.., ,.., ,.., , ~ '----@(J $7" "l]' tS;>'>~ ""'.... EXHIBIT "B" SKE:TCH TO ACCOMPANY A LEGAL DE:SCRIPTlON FOR HIGH TECH HIGH UNIVERSITY PARK LEASE PARCELS CHULA VISTA, CA LINE TABLE NO. BEARING T1 N48'26 26 E T2 541 33 34 E T3 541 33 34"E T4 N48 26'26"E T5 N48"26'26"E T6 N41 33 34 W T7 N48 26'26 E MAP 15233 LENGTH 48.00' 74.00 10.00 100.94' 129.52 10.00 76.70 r-- I -----------' i ... '" N48 26 26 E 513.25 POINT 'A' \ \ ) ) HUNTE PARKWAY 206.22' S48'26'26"W ~ CONSULTING T7 '" ... ,.., ,.., ... ... ... ... ~ It; PARCEL 1 '" PARCEL 2 '" . . ... ... ,.., ,.., ,.., ::l ,.., " " ~ :;:: ... Vl Vl ,.., ... T5 '---- 526.00' S48 26 26 W '---- '---- '---- SHEET I OF I SHEET I"LANNINI3 . ce::.sICllN . I:;OI..T"UCTllJ~J 9755 Cl...6.fl6,QlT l.eA. SCUL.EVAFD, SUTE 1)0 SAN DEOO, CAlJ"OI'NA 92124-'C324 !l5I.5I4.SCIOO . FAX ~ . -.RBF.CQft\ Sf:?TFJ.BE:J/ 27. 2006 J.N. 25-102119 H: \PDATA \2S102119\CADO\MAPPING\EXHIBITS\2119EXH1.DWG Gt.lELLOt.i 9/27/08 ~39 am 13-32 Exhibit B: High Tech High University Park Development Plan Overview The proposed High Tech High University Park Campus includes development of two HTH schools and a research center on approximately 10 acres. In Phase One (consisting of the original Demised Premises), an environmentally-focused high school and research center will be developed on approximately eight (8) acres. Phase Two (consisting of the First Expansion Area) will add a second HTH school on an additional adjacent two (2) acres. There is the potential to develop up to three additional HTH schools, or two schools and a school-related facility such as a performing arts center, gymnasium, or a thematically-related learning laboratory, on an additional six acres located within the ultimate development of the University Park and Research Center. Each school building will consist of classrooms, specialty labs, administration offices, a commons/dining area, and support/building core facilities. Outside areas may include learning patios, plazas, walkways, dining terraces, play yards including half basketball cowts, green space, areas for drop off and pick-up, and parking spaces for cars and bicycles. Lessee initially plans to operate each of the planned schools during the peak period of approximately 8:30 AM to 4:00 PM, though the facilities will be used by faculty, staff, students, and others before and after school hours and often on weekends and holidays as well. The start and end times for the different schools may be staggered to minimize traffic congestion around drop-off and pick-up times. Ancillary activities and programs such as, but not limited to, fundraising, athletic, preschool, childcare, adult education, research, performing arts, and community events may take place on the campus before, during, or after regular school hours and on weekends and holidays as well. The completed project will include significant grading, landscaping, lighting, signage, pedestrian pathways, fencing, and retaining walls. Parking and Allowable Dailv Trins IADTs): Lessee plans to meet the minimum requirements set forth in the Chula Vista Municipal Code for on-site parking. ADTs assigned to the 10 acre property must be sufficient to meet the requirements for the sizes and types of schools that Lessee develops on the campus. 21 13-33 j"'- c, 530 B Street, Seventh Floor San Diego CA 92101 Ph: 619-234-8484 Fax: 619-234-1935 ~ - 23 -2oo~ J..A-ex ~.. San Diego Regional Economic Development Corporation January 23, 2007 The Honorable Cheryl Cox and Members, Chula Vista City Council 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Dear Mayor Cox and Councilmembers, I have been involved with math-science education for almost twenty years and want to comment on the opportunity for Chula Vista to establish a High Tech High. In 1989 my company, TRW, was a founder of the California Academy of Mathematics and Science (CAMS), a specialized secondary school located on the campus ofCal State Dominguez Hills. Over almost two decades, that school has demonstrated the transformational power of a high-quality education based on a rigorous and innovative college-preparatory curriculum. They have demonstrated conclusively that students from non-English-speaking households, gang neighborhoods, or economically deprived areas can meet high expectations. Ninety-nine percent of their students are accepted to a four-year university, and 60% declare majors in mathematics or science- related areas and another 20% in areas where a math and science background will be valuable. For years, I have said that the CAMS model should be replicated allover the country to help our nation deal with what is becoming a chronic shortage of scientists and engineers. That is now happening thanks to a San Diego initiative, High Tech High, and its visionary leader, Larry Rosenstock. In San Diego in the late '90s, EDC's Vice President of Public Affairs, Rochelle Bold, along with the Business Roundtable for Education, brought together the business leaders who established High Tech High at the Naval Training Center site in Point Lorna. It opened in 2000. I was thrilled! High Tech High's mission, in their words, is "to provide students with relevant academic and workplace skills, preparing graduates for rewarding lives in an increasingly technological and global society." In 2003, the year they graduated their first students, they also extended their curriculum to middle school, a pivotal time for young people to become engaged in math and science. They added a Media Arts program to their high school and their middle school in 2005, the year they also opened a High Tech High in Redwood City, California. That year, they partnered with Explorer Elementary to open a High Tech Elementary school on the NTC campus. These initiatives - and the one planned in Chula Vista - are vital in the San Diego region, home of important 21 st century industries such as life sciences, communications, software, electronics, and defense and space. And, with Chula Vista's success in attracting the National Center for Sustainable Communities, there is \ ".\ \' \ \._ <" 11)( i i (',L;()I ) ll" III f '''''. ()r,L~ .- , The Honorable Cheryl Cox and Members, Chula Vista City Council January 23, 2007 Page Two great promise in the emerging industry of clean tech. Student demand is huge: 3,000 students applied for 285 spots at the existing High Tech High, meaning that 2,700 young people - people who could help our region meet its long-tenn workforce needs - were turned away. A High Tech High in Chula Vista can help meet the regional demand - and showcase Chula Vista as a place for high-tech industry investment. Thanks to the Gates Foundation and to Larry Rosenstock, who was recruited in 1999, San Diego is now the catalyst for the development of additional schools as well as an important set of principles based on Enact, Inspire, Enable and Influence. Enact is the opportunity for Chula Vista today. When I served on the Chula Vista Blue Ribbon Commission several years ago, one of the suggestions I made was to attract a High Tech High, which would make Chula Vista and the southern part of San Diego County more competitive for investment by technology-based industries that offer high-wage jobs. Building a strong math- and science-literate workforce is an important national issue. From 2004-2006 I served on the Secretary of Energy's Task Force for Math-Science Education, which recommended initiatives to expand the pool of teachers capable of not only teaching math and science, but attracting our young people to study and eventually build careers in math- and science-related fields. I believe that, thanks to efforts of the Council on Competitiveness, the National Academies of Science, and President's American Competitiveness Initiative, such efforts will gain more momentum. Chula Vista has the opportunity to be at the forerront of this national effort by establishing a High Tech High and Environmental Research Center. With Chula Vista's attraction ofthe National Center for Sustainable Communities as an anchor to more opportunities in higher education in Chula Vista, a High Tech High is an essential component. I strongly urge the City Council to APPROVE the lease agreement with HTH Learning as the critical first step in developing Chula Vista's own High Tech High and Environmental Research Center. Sincerely, =;:i:::~~G President & CEO