Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcc min 1983/02/15 MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA -~ Held Tuesday, February 15, ]983 The City Council met in the Council Chamber at the Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue on the above date at 7 p.m. with the following Councilmen present: Mayor Cox, McCandliss, Scott, Malcolm, Moore Councilmen absent: None ADJOURNMENT The Mayor adjourned the meeting at 9 p.m. until Thursday, Redeve]0pment Agency Meeting February 17 f0]]0wing / at 4 p.m. in the Council Conference Room, City Hall, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, California. I, Jennie M. Fulasz, City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that this is a full, true and correct copy of an order by the City Council at the meeting of February ]5, ]983 STATE OF CALIFOP~NIA AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING ORDER COUNTY OF S~ DIEGO ss OF ADJOUP~N~.~ENT OF MEETF~G CITY OF CHULA VISTA I, Jennie M. Fulasz, being first duly sworn depose and say: That I am the duly chosen, qualified and acting City Clerk of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista; That the re9u]ar meeting of the Cottncil of the City of Chula Vista was hel. d Tuesday, February 15, ]983 and said meeting was adjou. rned to the time and place specified in the order of adjournment ATTACHED HERETO: That on Wednesday, February 16, 1983 at the hour of ]] :]5 am I posted a copy of said order at a conspicuous place on or near the door of the place at which said me~ting of February ]5, ]983 was held. S~tbscribed and sworn to before me this , day of 19 Notary PtLblic in and for said County and State of California MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA Tuesday February 15, 1983 Council Chamber 7:00 p.m. Public Service Building ROLL CALL Councilmembers present: Mayor Cox, Councilmembers McCandliss, Scott, Malcolm, Moore Councilmembers absent: None Staff present: City Manager Goss, City Attorney Lindberg PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE, SILENT PRAYER The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by Mayor Cox followed by a moment of silent prayer. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES for the meetings of January 27, and February 8, 1983 MSUC (Cox/Moore) to approve the minutes. 2. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY (None) 3. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS a. Request from Elder Dale Kome, Pastor Chula Vista Reorganized Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints urging Council's support of responsible reduction and eventual elimination of nuclear armaments Councilwoman McCandliss motioned for a resolution expressing support of international nuclear disarmament. The motion died for lack of a second. MSC(Malcolm/Scott) to file the request. Councilwoman McCandliss voted "no". PUBLIC HEARING AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS 4. PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERATION OF ESTABLISHING UNDERGROUND UTILITY DISTRICT NO. 115 ON "L" STREEET FROM COLORADO AVENUE TO BROADWAY (City Engineer) This being the time and place as advertised Mayor Cox opened the public hearing. The Underground Utility Advisory Committee at its meeting on January 5, 1983, discussed the possibility of forming an underground utility district along "L" City Council Meeting - 2 - February 15, 1983 Street from Colorado Avenue to Broadway. The reason for the district is to coordinate the undergrounding of utilities required from a developer in the area as part of building permit approval. The Developer, Dan Building Company, is proposing to construct two office buildings at 670-680 "L" Street and was required by City Council to underground utilities along the properties with "L" Street frontage. Director of Engineering John Lippitt stated the district was conceived as a solution to a underground deferral request from Dan Building Company on "L" Street easterly of Industrial Boulevard. As a solution to that deferral which was not granted, a reduced amount was allowed to be contributed by Dan Building Company as part of an overall undergrounding district. Mr. Lippitt showed a plat of the district area noting that two poles on the north side of the street will not be included in the district and will not be visually impacted by the overall district. All property owners on the north end of the district would be required to convert their facilities to receive underground service at their own expense. This district will have no further expenses, residential or commercial except for Dan Building Company inasmuch as the commercial is already undergrounded and the residential will still be served by overhead facilities. There being no comments, either for or against, the hearing was declared closed. MSUC(Scott/Malcolm) to direct staff to bring back a resolution forming the district. 5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS (None) CONSENT CALENDAR MSUC (Cox/Scott) to approve the Consent Calendar (Items 6-10). 6 a. RESOLUTION 11166 APPROVING MAP OF CHULA VISTA TRACT 80-20 UNIT 3, CHARTER POINT, ACCEPTING ON BEHALF OF THE PUBLIC THE PUBLIC STREETS DEDICATED ON SAID MAP, AND ACCEPTING ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA THE EASEMENTS GRANTED ON SAID MAP WITHIN SAID SUBDIVISION, AND APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR THE COMPLETION IMPROVEMENTS REQUIRED BY SAID SUBDIVISION AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAME (City Engineer) b. RESOLUTION 11167 APPROVING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND TREETOPS UNLIMITED, A JOINT VENTURE COMPOSED OF PACIFIC SCENE, INC. AND FINANCIAL SCENE, INC., WAIVING RIGHT TO PROTEST THE FORMATION OF A REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT FOR TELEGRAPH CANYON ROAD AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT (City Engineer) City Council Meeting - 3 - February 15, 1983 On September 30, 1980 Council approved the Tentative Map for Chula Vista Tract 80-20, Charter Point Subdivision. The Final Map has been checked and found to be in conformance with the Tentative Map. On January 21, 1983 the developers executed the Subdivision Improvement Agreement. Appropriate surety has been posted for all public improvements. The developers also executed an agreement not to protest the formation of a reimbursement district as required by the conditions of approval of the Tentative Map. The developers have paid all fees, executed the required documents and complied with all conditions of approval applicable to Unit 3. 7. RESOLUTION 11168 APPROVING THE CLAIM FOR 2% NONMOTORIZED TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT ACT FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR 1983-84 (City Engineer) During FY 1983-84, approximately $600,000 will be available through Transportation Development Act 2% monies for the construction of nonmotorized facilities in the San Diego Region. The allocation of these funds is processed by the Bicycle Facilities Committee operating under SANDAG predetermined criteria. Prior to submission of Chula Vista's project applications, a City Council resolution approving the claim is required. The deadline for applications to SANDAG is March 1, 1983. 8. REPORT BAY GENERAL COMMUNITY HOSPITAL REQUEST TO CONDUCT A IO-K RACE AND TWO-MILE FUN RUN (Director of Parks and Recreation) Bay General Community Hospital has requested approval to conduct a lO-Kilometer Race and a 2-Mile Fun Run on Saturday, May 21, 1983. This will be the third annual Bay General Hospital's event to raise funds for the Cardiac Rehabilitation Program and increase public awareness of the importance of good health. In conjunction with the runs, hospital personnel will conduct a health screening service in Memorial Park Bowl area. For safety reasons, the Police Department and Traffic Engineer did not concur in the route requested for the 2-mile event and, through contact with the sponsor, arrived at an acceptable alternative. 9. REPORT AMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY REQUEST TO CONDUCT A BIKE-A-THON (Director of Parks and Recreation) The American Cancer Society of San Diego County has requested approval to conduct its Seventh Annual Bike-a-Thon within the City between 8:30 a.m. and 4:00 p.m. Sunday, March 20, 1983. lO. REPORT AMERICAN YOUTH HOSTELS' REQUEST TO STAGE GRAND BICYCLE TOUR OF FIVE CITIES THROUGH CHULA VISTA (Director of Parks and Recreation) The American Youth Hostels is conducting its Fourth Annual Grand Bicycle Tour of Five Cities on Sunday, February 27, 1983. The bicycle tour, with an expected participation of 6,000 bicyclists, will follow a route skirting the busy portions of the City approved by Traffic Engineer and Police Department. City Council Meeting - 4 - February 15, 1983 (End of Consent Calendar) RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES, FIRST READING ll. RESOLUTION 11169 ACCEPTING THE WORK ON THE REMODELED COUNTY COURT BUILDING AND APPROPRIATING $628 TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL FUNDS TO PAY THE BONUS EARNED BY THE CONTRACTOR (Director of Building and Housing) On September 16, 1982, the City Council awarded a contract to Sea Pacific Corporation, San Diego in the amount of $65,830 for remodeling of the old County Courthouse for legislative offices. The contract specified that work be completed in 35 working days from October 20, 1982 with a specific bonus of $150 per day for each day work was completed prior to November 30, 1982 thereby earning a bonus of ll days for a total bonus of $1,650. The contin9ency fund will cover $1,022 of the bonus leaving $628 to be appropriated from the unappropriated balance of the General Fund. In answer to Councilwoman McCandliss' query Director of Building and Housin9 Grady said this was the second time we have put in a bonus clause in a contract and stated it was an incentive to getting the job done faster. Councilwoman McCandliss stated she felt this was a good process if it brings things in under a time period but because of the amount of money per day we would have to be very careful on correctly estimating how much time we estimate it would take to do a job. City Mana9er Goss indicated this is a process that should be used selectively when there is a project which has a particular time frame and can be very effective. RESOLUTION OFFERED by COUNCILI~AN MALCOLM, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously. Mayor Cox remarked that the contractor did a timely job which was aesthetically pleasing and performed above and beyond the letter of the contract. MSUC (Cox/Malcolm) for staff to prepare a letter of appreciation to the contractor. 12. RESOLUTION 11170 APPROVING EXTENSION OF TIME, WALNUT AVENUE SEWER SLIPLINING, "G" STREET TO "J" STREET (City Engineer) Pacific Engineers was awarded the contract for the Construction of Walnut Avenue Sewer Sliplining. Award was made on October 5, 1982, by Resolution No. 11029. The contract is dated November 3, 1982. A 20 working day extension of time is requested which will change the completion date of the contract from February 8, 1983 to March 10, 1983. RESOLUTION OFFERED BY COUNCILMAN MOORE, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously. I'1 T City Council Meeting - 5 - February 15, 1983 13. RESOLUTION 11171 APPROPRIATING COMMUNITY BLOCK GRANT FUNDS FOR THE OTAY VALLEY ROAD REDEVELOPMENT STUDY (Director of Community Development) On January 13, the Redevelopment Agency designated the Otay Valley Road area as a Redevelopment Survey Area. At that time, it was indicated that the Council would be approached with a recommendation regarding funding for costs of formulating a redevelopment plan for the Otay Valley Road area. The resolution transfers $35,600 from Block Grant funds for the Otay Valley Redevelopment Study costs. Councilwoman McCandliss questioned the expenditure of this amount of money for the study. Director of Community Development Desrochers explained that it was necessary to do the detail work that must be accomplished before the City can certify to the letter of the State law that it does indeed qualify as a Redevelopment Area. There is also the need to show how the City is going to get that money and what type of potential development there is that will repay the redevelopment expenses. Councilman Moore indicated that if this did not come to pass, whatever study that would be made would it be beneficial if the road were to be widened or useful in a different entity. If someone was going to construct south of Otay Valley Road, the study would assist in working with flood plains, etc. Councilman Scott stated that staff would be looking at this not only for redevelopmerit but information that would be of a lasting nature. Director of Community Development Desrochers stated that 75-80% of information would be of that nature. RESOLUTION OFFERED BY COUNCILStAN MALCOLM, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously. 14. RESOLUTION 11172 APPROVING LEASE AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND CONGRESSMAN JAMES BATES FOR LEASING CERTAIN LEGISLATIVE OFFICE SPACE {Assistant City Manager) A two-year lease agreement between the City and Congressman Jim Bates has been negotiated for the leasing of office space. The lease agreement has been executed by Congressman Bates and is ready for City Council approval. RESOLUTION OFFERED BY COUNCILWOMAN McCANDLISS, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously. 15a. ORDINANCE 2023 AMENDING CHAPTER 8.34 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING THERETO A NEW SECTION 8.34.040 RELATING TO THE TERMINATION OF REGULATIONS OF HAZARDOUS WASTE MATERIALS FIRST READING (City Attorney) City Attorney Lindberg stated that this ordinance does not change in any way the previous ordinance but places a sunset clause on the existing ordinance. City Council Meeting - 6 - February 15, 1983 Mr. E. L. Porter, 418 "I" Street, Chula Vista, representing garage owners, read from a list of questions: feels County is using small businesses to pay for their setting up their newest department; Section 25351 explains that State has funds to be used for clean-up of hazardous waste in case of spill or catastrophic event as set forth in Section ll4C of the Federal Act 42 of US Code 9412C; why is the County trying to stick the cities for the bill or is this a scare tactic for cities to pay for these massive cleanups; why are requested permit fees the exact same fees listed for a waste facility; County has already informed the repair garages that they are not a facility but a waste generator; how can County charge for a permit when State will give one free; according to County Hazardous Waste Plan, the County is supposed to conduct on-site inspection of the generators to determine degree of potential hazard represented by these firms; how many and at what locations did the County make these on-site inspections before implementing their fee structure; County Hazardous Waste Management was to form a subcommittee of Health Services Advisory Committee to address issues concerning the hazardous waste program; was the subcommittee formed, if so, was the small garage repair industry represented. According to the County Survey, this industry was responsible for 37% of hazardous waste producers; if so, it would seem logical that 37% of this industry be represented on this subcommittee. To charge a permit fee which the consumer will eventually have to pay on certain byproducts of industry that appear on the hazardous waste because they are an irritant or flammable seems grossly unfair. The best approach would be to rescind the ordinance and send a resolution to County of San Diego requesting they meet with State Hazardous Waste Management Council to discuss their plan to implement a workable Hazardous Waste Program that meets the California State Code. Mr. Akers responded to all the questions posed by Mr. Porter and the Council summarizing: waste oil is considered a hazardous waste on the specifics list; money State has for clean-up will only cover the first five of 50 clean-up sites that appear on the list - - none are in San Diego; the fee structure for facilities being called waste producers was an oversight on the part of the County; auto industry was not represented on the Committee; San Diego Chamber of Commerce was asked to send them a variety of representative types - they submitted six different industry types to serve on the committee; most were safety engineers who were interested in health issues relating to waste policy rather than specific policy that deals with implementation of the program. Section 510 of Health and Recovery authorizes the Health Authority to charge cost recovery fees in relation to any program; people with highest degree of training are involved, six of the eight people have Master's Degrees with a minor in chemistry and some with experience in industrial processes. State Manifest System is designed so transporters of hazardous waste must account for waste that they pick up. A workshop for transporters is intended City Council Meeting - 7 - February 15, 1983 to include state people and explain the program to them. The Fire Department is acutely interested in these activities and they will be sharin9 a great -'~ deal of information with fire departments; all violations of everyone under permit will be submitted to the Fire Department. Paul Gibson, 1259 Calle Candelero, Chula Vista, President of Southern California Service Station Association, and owner of Union 76 service station on Bonita Road shared a letter from the California Waste Management Board from Guenther W. Moskat, Manager of Used Oil Recyclin9 Program for the assistance of the service stations to provide a place for the public to brin9 in its used oil. The Association is not pleased to be assessed with a fee or fine when they are proposing to do a service for the community and the State. Mr. Akers stated he met with State Waste Management Conference in Santa Barbara and the policy in dealing with waste oil was a concern. They agree there is a need to recycle waste oil and concur with service stations to serve the public in accepting waste oil. Waste oil is the only hazardous waste that is exempted from manifesting and only in the situation where it is collected from the public by service stations that belong to this sort of pro9ram. Councilman Malcolm stated he could not support the original ordinance and several issues need to be looked into: concern with bureaucracy and other small businesses bein9 charged; problem isn't acute in San Diego that we should be required to enact an ordinance to put additional bureaucratic structure in San Diego and tax the people for it; he would vote for the ordinance as amended and sunset clauses but is adamantly opposed to the present ordinance. MSUC (McCandliss/Moore) to place the ordinance on first reading, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously. Mayor Cox stated that the ordinance contains a sunset clause on the fee schedule for July 1, 1984. It will no longer have any force and effect after that time unless Council shows a desire to enact a new ordinance. b. RESOLUTION 11173 REQUESTING SAN DIEGO COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO RECONSIDER PORTIONS OF THE HAZARDOUS WASTE ORDINANCE (City Attorney) On February 10, 1983, the City Council directed that a resolution be directed to the Board of Supervisors to clearly express the desire to immediately provide some relief to the service station businesses subject to the regulations and to examine other small businesses which may be unduly burdened by the regulations, as well as to take the necessary steps to ensure a uniformity of the application of the State law and County regulations throughout the County of San Diego. RESOLUTION OFFERED BY COUNCILWOMAN McCANDLISS, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously. City Council Meeting - 8 - February 15, 1983 Mayor Cox stated the resolution is an acknowledgement by the City Council that the $75 inspection fee is too high and makes specific reference to a suggested level of a $20 fee or even lower for inspection purposes. MSUC (McCandliSs/Cox) to send letter to Board of Supervisors expressing Council's concerns. MS (Malcolm/Moore) that the City Attorney bring back an appropriate resolution and ordinance removing the City from the hazardous waste program. The motion failed by the following vote: Ayes: Malcolm and Moore NOES: McCandliss, Scott, Cox Absent: None MSUC {Moore/Malcolm) to send a letter to the County Board of Supervisors over the Mayor's signature showing Council's concern in this particular area in voicing a minority vote - the letter to be sent with the resolution. 16. ORDINANCE 2024 AMENDING SECTIONS 10.52.090 AND 10.64.010 OF THE CHULA VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO PARKING OF COMMERCIAL VEHICLES IN RESIDENTIAL AREAS - FIRST READING {City Attorney) This amendment would increase the weight limitations on commercial vehicles parking in residential areas and traveling off truck routes. The amendments would bring the Municipal Code into conformity with State laws. RESOLUTION OFFERED BY COUNCILMAN MALCOLM, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously. 17. REPORT OF THE CITY MANAGER (None) 18. MAYOR'S REPORT a. California Coastal Commission scheduled a public hearing on February 24 at 9:00 a.m. at Shelter Island Inn to consider the I-5 widening; Route 54 construction and Sweetwater Flood Control Project. b. Mayor Cox requested Council to authorize trip to Sacramento on Wednesday, February 16 to meet with California Director of Fish and Game regarding soliciting their cooperation concerning the Coastal Commission public hearing on February 24. MSUC(Malcolm/McCandliss) to authorize Mayor Cox's trip to Sacramento. City Council Meeting - 9 - February 15, 1983 c. Assembly Bill 498 has been recently introduced to the State Legislature with regard to implementing provisions for the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) decision rendered by the State Supreme Court last week and Mayor Cox asked that this item be referred to our Legislative Committee with a request they come back with a report on Thursday, February 17, 1983. MSUC (Cox/Moore) to refer to the Legislative Committee. d. MSUC (Cox/Moore) to continue this meeting to Thursday, February 17, following the Redevelopmerit Agency meeting. e. MSUC (Cox/Moore) to write a letter to the Chairman of the Unified Port District to put back into their Master Plan the "second arm" (J Street to north of "F" Street) f. MSUC (Cox/Malcolm) to authorize the Council's delegate to support Sandag's policy changes (change meeting dates due to availability of Board Members) g. Mayor Cox announced that the City Council has selected the seven people to serve on the Commission on Aging: Mary DiRienzo; Don LeCompte; Margaret Helton; Harold Johnson; Helen Stokes; Dorothea Grindle and Tom Emmons~ Mayor Cox will send out a notification and Council ratified the appointments. MSUC (Cox/McCandliss) to appoint these individuals to serve on the Commission on Aging. 19.COUNCIL COMMENTS a. Councilman Malcolm discussed the "Granny Flats" legislation which has a deadline of July l, 1983 for adoption by the cities. MSUC (Malcolm/Moore) on "Granny Flats" legislation - staff to present packet (information) to Board of Realtors and Chamber of Commerce. b. MSUC (Malcolm/Cox) for the Mayor to send a letter of support to the legislators supporting AB 14 annexation of adjacent territories that might not have been approved by LAFCO which are already developed or in the developed area, and receiving City benefits. c. Councilman Malcolm expressed his concern regarding the City Clerk~s memo on "abstaining" votes being recorded as "yes" votes if no reason is given. Councilman Malcolm declared he has a "possible conflict of interest" (General Plan Amendment on "J" Street). ~ity Council Meeting - lO - February 15, 1983 MSUC (Scott/McCandliss) that Councilman Malcolm's vote be recorded as an abstention. d. MSUC(Malcolm/Moore) for a Closed Session for litigation purposes. e. Councilman Moore will provide Council with County's "E" Street Trolley Station schedule. ADJOURNMENT AT 9:15 p.m. to the meetings scheduled for Thursday, February 17 at 4:00 p.m. and Tuesday, February 22 at 7:00 p.m. Council recessed to Closed Session at 8:30 p.m. The City Clerk was excused and the Mayor announced that the meeting adjourned at 9:15 p.m. WPC/0261C PAG