Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcc min 1983/03/22STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING ORDER COb~TY OF S~ DIEGO ) ss OF ADJOU~N~.~NT OF MZETI~]G CITY OF CHULA VISTA ) I, Jennie M. Fulasz, being first duly sworn depose and say : That I am the duly chosen, qualified and acting City Clerk of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista; That the regular meeting of the Council of the City of Chula Vista was held luesday, March 22, ]983 and said meeting was adjourned to the time and place specified in the order of adjournment ATTACHED HERETO: That on Wednesday, March 23, ]983 at the hour of ]0:]5 a.m. I posted a copy of said order at a conspicuous place on or near the door of the place at which said me~ting of March 22, ]983 was held. ~ ~~yClerk S~Lbscribed and sworn to before me this day of 19 Notary PL~01ic in and for said County and State of California MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA Held Tuesday, March 22, 1983 The City Council met in the Council Chamber at the Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue on the above date at 7 p.m. with the following Councilmen present: Mayor C0x~ McCandliss,-SC0tt, ~tc0]m, Moore Councilmen absent: None ADJOUP~NMENT The Mayor adjourned the meeting at 9:20 p.m. until 4 Dm Thursday, March 24, 1983 at 4 p.m. in the Council Conference Room, City Hall, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, California. I, Jennie M. Fulasz, City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista, DO HEREBY CERTIFY that this is a full, true and correct copy of an order by the City Council at the meeting of March 22, ]983. it~yEoi ~AS Z~C~ ity of Chula Vista, Calilornla MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA Tuesday.- 7:00 p.m. March 22, 1983 ROLL CALL Councilmembers present: Mayor Cox, Councilmembers Scott, Malcolm, Moore, McCandliss Councilmembers absent: None Staff present: City Manager Goss, City Attorney Lindberg, Assistant City Manager Asmus PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE, SILENT PRAYER Pledge of allegiance to the Flag was led by Mayor Cox followed by a moment of silent prayer. Mayor Cox asked the audience to remember in the silent prayer the City employees who have recently died: Ken Smithey who was Batallion Chief in the Fire Department and Ross Noburn, Maintenance Gardiner with the Parks and Recreation Department. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES for March lO and March 15, 1983. Mayor Cox asked for a correction on the minutes of March lO, page 4 under his comment that the revenue sharing monies and Community Block funds would be continued next year. Mayor Cox indicated this was just a "recommendation". MSUC{Scott/Moore) to approve the minutes as modified. 2. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY a. City Manager Goss presented certificates to Mayor Cox, Councilman Malcolm and Councilman Moore, in which they were named honorary members of the Tennessee House of Respresentatives. Mr. Goss stated that John Crouse, Director of Public Works Operations and Bill Berry, Assistant Street Maintenance Superintendent were also named by the Tennessee Legislature in recognition of the Chula Vista CHIP Seal Program. 3. WRITTEN COMMUNICATION a. Request for City to investigate flood-control channel on property at First Avenue near Millan Court {St. John's Episcopal Church) The request concerns the open City-owned flood control channel which bisects the Parish school property on First Avenue near Millan, which they feel constitutes a life threatening hazard to school and neighborhood children during flood conditions. The request is for the City to investigate this site. AGENDA - 2 - March 22, 1983 The City Manager recommended that this concern be referred to staff for investigation and report. MSUC (McCandliss/Malcolm) to refer this to staff. PUBLIC HEARING AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS 4. PUBLIC HEARING CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FOR RATE SCHEDULE AMENDMENT FOR MEDTRANS (DBA HARTSON'S AMBULANCE SERVICE) (Director of Public Safety/Director of Finance) a. RESOLUTION 11189 APPROVING RATE SCHEDULE AMENDMENT FOR MEDTRANS (DBA HARTSON'S AMBULANCE SERVICE) This being the time and place as advertised Mayor Cox opened the public hearing. In his written report to Council, Director of Finance Grant explained that Hartson's Ambulance Service requested and received a rate increase on December 1, 1982. Subsequent to that increase, reimbursements would be made upon the basis of an "all-inclusive charge" as no separate allowances would be made for special medical procedures. In response, Hartson's is requesting an amendment to the current paramedic rate schedule so that Medicare patients can receive the maximum reimbursement possible. This rate schedule adjustment is not designed to be an overall rate increase rather an inclusion in the basic rate of certain charges which are now charged separately. The fee for the average patient would not change significantly. Mr. Tom Morgan, one of the owners of Hartson's Ambulance Service responded to Council's questions concerning: (1) the legislation which allowed the reimbursement policy, (2) comparison of the rates charged with that existing one year ago, (3) the base rate and the surcharges, (4) advanced life support ambulance services, (5) rates charged for paramedic services, (6) billings made to Medical and Medicare patients, (7) the profile rate for these patients, (8) treatment and miscellaneous charges; (9) life-line support reimbursements. There being no further comments, either for or against, the public hearing was declared closed. Councilwoman McCandliss questioned Mr. Morgan regarding a breakdown of the specific charges commenting that raising the profile rate would not be in the best interest of the citizen's of this community. She added that the City is handicapped in a way because it does not have the expertise needed to evaluate the reimbursement criteria as proposed by Hartsons. Mr. Morgan responded by stating that they are well below the profile rate in Chula Vista. He discussed the "crossover patients" those that have both Medical and Medicare insurance noting that the ambulance company has a 50% acceptance of the assignments in this particular area. I1" AGENDA - 3 - March 22, 1983 MS(McCandliss/Scott) not to approved the rate request. The motion failed by the following vote to wit: AYES: McCandliss, Scott Noes: Cox, Malcolm, Moore Absent: None RESOLUTION OFFERED BY MAYOR COX, the readinq of the text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved by the following vote: AYES: Cox, Malcolm, Moore Noes: McCandliss, Scott Absent: None 5. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS a. Bess Pocklington, 656 Glover Place,Chula Vista, complained of the San Diego Gas and Electric air pollution stating that there is now another factor noise pollution. She declared that it gets so bad that the windows in the homes of this area vibrate day and night and asked if there is something the Council can do about this. Councilman Malcolm said he would like to see a committee of two, from the Council, meet with representatives of San Diego Gas and Electric and discuss both the air and noise qualities and perhaps negotiate on these items. MSUC (Scott/Malcolm) to form an ad hoc committee of two Councilmembers to look into the possibilities of correcting any possible problems in this area - both noise and air. Councilmembers Malcolm and McCandliss volunteered to serve on this committee. b. Patricia Porter, I Street, Chula Vista, complained that since the Telephone Company vacated their office on I Street, the people in Chula Vista who want new telephone service must go to Imperial Beach. She added that there are no buses going to Imperial Beach and it is making it very difficult for the residents of Chula Vista to get this telephone service. MSUC(Scott/McCandliss) to refer this matter to staff to report back to the City Council. c. Mr. Frank Ferriera, Bonita Glen Drive, Chula Vista, discussed a newspaper article in the Star News of February 20, 1983, which referred to a possible conflict"6'i~ ~n~est on the part of Councilman Scott regarding the Chula Vista Sanitary Service. Mr. Ferriera stated that three weeks ago he was visited by a member of the Ethic's Committee inquiring into this matter. Mr. Ferriera informed him that he also deals in the stock market and is known as a "trader" and that it was quite possible for a AGENDA - 4 - March 22, 1983 stock broker to make a good living off these commissions. He added that Councilman Scott pursued him to open an account with his brokerage firm and Mr. Ferriera declined pointing out to him that it would be a possible conflict of interest to do so as long as Councilman Scott remained on the Council. Mr. Ferriera posed the following questions: (1) what amount of commission did Mr. Scott earn by handling Mr. Chase's account? (2) does Mr. Scott handle brokerage accounts for others where conflict of interest may exist? (3) Does the City have other contractural relationships with local businesses such as insurance,newspaper advertising, construction, redevelopment projects and transit services and others; where Mr. Scott could possibly have potential conflict of interest problems? (4) what conclusion, if any, has been reached by the Ethic's Committee and will their findings be published publicly? Mr. Ferriera added that their appears to be a passive cover-up of the newspapers. He questioned why Mr. Scott needs the City Attorney to rule in this matter and that Mr. Scott is capable of knowing whether or not he has a conflict of interest. Mr. Ferriera added that Mr. Scott should refrain from voting on matters of the City Council until answers are given to all these questions. If not Mr. Ferriera called for his resignation. Councilman Scott declared that he has never, ever, contacted Mr. Ferriera about a brokerage account. CONSENT CALENDAR (Items 8-11) MSUC(Moore/Malcolm) to approve the Consent Calendar. 6. ORDINANCE 2025 REZONING APPROXIMATELY 4 ACRES AT 321 RANCHO DRIVE FROM R-3-11 TO R-3-P-13 - SECOND READING AND ADOPTION (Director of Planning) At the meeting of March 15, 1983, the City Council placed the ordinance on first reading. The ordinance requires 3.80 acres located at 321 Rancho Drive from R-3-P-11 (Multiple family residential at a density of 11 units per acre and subject to the Precise Plan Modifying District) to R-3-P-13 (13 dwelling units per acre). 7. ORDINANCE 2026 IMPLEMENTING ENFORCEMENT OF SECTIONS 21107.6 AND 21107.8 CVC ON THE PRIVATELY OWNED PARKING FACILITIES AT THE CHULA VISTA SHOPPING CENTER, BONITA CENTRE AND SKATELAND - SECOND READING AND ADOPTION (Director of Public Safety) At the meeting of March 15, 1983, the City Council placed the ordinance on first reading. It permits the Police Department to issue citations to motorists parked in redlined "no parking" areas of the centers. AGENDA - 5 - March 22, 1983 8. ORDINANCE 2027 ADOPTING THE UNIFORM BUILDING CODE, 1982 EDITION - SECOND READING AND ADOPTION (Director of Building and Housing) Director of Building and Housing Grady reported that the major changes to the Uniform Building Code, 1982 Edition are in Chapter 25 and Chapter 33. Chapter 25 regulates wood, wood projects and their use in construction and has been revised to reflect the 1977 Edition of the National Design Specifications for Wood Construction. In addition, the provisions of the code dealing with lumber in contact or near the ground have been revised based upon the latest data from the National Forest Products Associations. Chapter 33 is the chapter regulating the number of occupants in a building, exit corridors and exit doors. The basic changes in Chapter 33 have been the reformatting and separating the chapter into three sections entitled: "GENERAL", "OCCUPANT LOAD" and "EXITS REQUIRED." The ordinance was placed on first reading at the meeting of March 15, 1983. 9. ORDINANCE 2028 ADOPTING UNIFORM FIRE CODE, 1982 EDITION, AND THE APPENDIX THERETO SECOND READING AND ADOPTION (Director of Building and Housing) The 1982 Edition shows an improvement over the 1979 Edition in terms of greater clarification overall. Significant changes have occured in the following areas: (1) Article 85 - this new article applies to the permanent or temporary use of electrical appliances, fixtures, motors or wiring; (2) Article 86 - this new article applies to both inside and outside storage of all pesticides in portable containers; (3) Appendix III-C this appendix governs the requirements for the installation, use and maintenance of all fire alarm systems in all occupancies. The ordinance was placed on first reading at the meeting of March 15, 1983. 10. ORDINANCE 2029 AMENDING SECTION 18.44.010 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE ENFORCEMENT OF CONDITIONS, COVENANTS AND RESTRICTIONS - SECOND READING AND ADOPTION (City Attorney) The amendment to the existing ordinance relates to the City's right of enforcement of conditions, covenants and restrictions limiting such right to enforcement of those matters which are within the purview of the public interest as opposed to private agreements that may be established between the party owners of subdivisions. On February l, 1983, the City Council approved the CC&Rs for Castle Park Townhomes in accordance with the request of the Veterans Administration, which had expressed opposition to the existing City requirements that the City be a party to any declaration of CC&Rs and have the same rights of enforcement as any owner within the subdivision. The Veterans Administration did not feel that such an authorization of enforcement to the City was consistent with the rights of those parties to whom they were lending money. The ordinance was place on first reading at the meeting of March 15, 1983. AGENDA - 6 - March 22, 1983 11. ORDINANCE 2030 AMENDING SECTION 5.06.020 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE DOWNTOWN IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT FEE FOR BARBERS AND BEAUTICIANS - FIRST READING (City Attorney) At their meeting of March 15, 1983, the City Council adopted the recommendation of staff to amend Ordinance No. 1964 and set a maximum assessment of $100 per business location for all barbers and beauticians in the Downtown Improvement District. Mayor Cox referred to Item ll asking whether there were any other classifications or categories that need to be studied. Director of Finance Grant stated that he met with representatives of the Downtown Association. They discussed whether any other groups felt discriminated against and no one requested any other clarifications. MSUC(Cox/Moore) to direct staff to report back to the City Council concernin9 any other amendments that may be necessary to the Downtown Improvement District fee schedule as it relates to an equitable assessment. End of Consent Calendar. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES~ FIRST READING 12. RESOLUTION lll90 AMENDMENT TO BONITA GLEN SPECIFIC PLAN SIGN REGULATIONS (Continued from 3/15/83 meeting) (Director of Planning) Director of Planning Gray reported that on September 22, 1982, the Plannin9 Commission recommended that the City Council amend the Bonita Glen Specific Plan sign regulations in accordance with Commission Resolution PCM-83-1, which established new criteria and standards for wall signs, monument signs and freestanding pole signs. On November 16, 1982, the City Council discussion on the proposed sign regulations focused on the freeway oriented sign and staff believes it was their intent to adopt the new sign regulations as proposed by the Planning Commission and as revised by Council. For this reason, a new resolution replacing Resolution No. ll080 has been prepared which includes the adoption of Commission Resolution PCM-83~l and as revised by Council. Mr. Gene York, 160 Brightwood Street, Chula Vista, stated that the recommended change makes the ordinance considerablymore lenient than when first ~dopted. He asked that Council adopt the ordinance tonight or at a later date, but add a provision whereby a developer can make a request to present a sign program for his development similar to what you can do in the other comnmercial zones in the city. This program can be approved by the zoning administrator rather than going back to the Planning Commission and Council. AGENDA - 7 - March 22, 1983 Council discussion ensued regarding the "P" precise zone and its regulations, the specific plan adopted for this area and the variations to the specific plans when those sign standards would have to go back to the Planning Commission and Council. Director of Planning Gray recommended that the resolution be adopted and that he and his staff will take a look at the proposal submitted by Mr. York. RESOLUTION OFFERED BY COUNCILMAN MALCOLM, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent. Councilwoman McCandliss stated that she could support the resolution but she is against item "c",in the staff report which has to do with the freeway oriented pole signs and she wishes to issue a protest on her vote for item "c". The offer of the resolution passed by the following vote: AYES: Councilmembers Malcolm, Moore, McCandliss (protesting "c"), Cox Noes: Councilman Scott Absent: None MSUC(Malcolm/Cox) to refer to staff Mr. York's proposal and then to report back to the Council at their convenience. 13. RESOLUTION 11191 DIRECTING THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA TO SELECT REDEVELOPMENT AREA BOUNDARIES AND PREPARE A PRELIMINARY PLAN FOR THE OTAY VALLEY ROAD REDEVELOPMENT SURVEY AREA (Community Development Director) On January 13, 1983, the Chula Vista Redevelopment Agency designated the Otay Valley Road area as a Redevelopment Survey Area. On February 15, 1983, the City Council transferred Community Development Block Grant funds for costs associated with the redevelopment study. California Community Redevelopment Law stipulates that the next significant step following designation of a Survey Area by the Redevelopment Agency is the study of the area by the Planning Commission, the Redevelopmerit Agency, and the Redevelopment Agency staff. If such a study concludes that significant reasons do indeed exist and should be addressed by Redevelopment activity, the Planning Commission, assisted by Agency staff, will select area boundaries and prepare a Preliminary Plan. The boundaries and the Preliminary Plan will then be submitted to the Redevelopment Agency for its approval. OFFERED BY COUNCILMAN SCOTT, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously. AGENDA - 8 - March 22, 1983 14. RESOLUTION 11192 GRANTING THE APPEAL OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE BONITA GLEN SPECIFIC PLAN AND CONTINUING THE PROHIBITION AGAINST GAS STATIONS AND CAR WASHES On March 15, 1983, the City Council heard the appeal of the prior Planning Commission approval of an amendment to the Bonita Glen Specific Plan which would have allowed gas stations and car washes to be added to the list of permitted uses. The City Council decided in favor of the appellant and granted the appeal which in effect continued the exclusion of gas stations and car washes from the list of permitted uses in the Bonita Glen Specific Plan area. RESOLUTION OFFERED BY COUNCILWOMAN McCANDLISS, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent. The offer of the resolution passed by the following vote: AYES: McCandliss, Scott, Moore Noes: Cox, Malcolm Absent: None 15. REPORT OF THE CITY MANAGER a. City Manager Goss reported on the tragedy that occurred at the Golf Course yesterday, in which one of the City workers lost his life. He stated that there will be a risk-management investigation of this tragedy. Mr. Goss noted the hazard of the river going through the Golf Course noting that some motorists and young people are not heeding the warning signs and are trying to cross the waters. He issued a plea to everyone to take the greatest care here until the waters subside. REPORTS OF CITY OFFICERS AND DEPARTMENT HEADS 16. REPORT COVERING CITY ORDINANCE THAT PROHIBITS ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONSUMPTION IN THE "j" STREET MARINA AREA (Continued from 3/15/83 meeting) (Director of Public Safety) In June 1981, Section 2.67.025 of the Municipal Code was enacted in order to prohibit the consumption of alcoholic beverages in the vicinity of the J Street Marina. In April of 1982 the life of this ordinance was extended for one year. The Director of Public Safety reported that because of the many changes that have taken place in this area, the prohibition against drinking alcoholic beverages should be allowed to lapse on April 20, 1983. The Curfew Ordinance will remain and will provide sufficient control in this area. AGENDA - 9 - March 22, 1983 At the Council meeting of March 15, 1983, this item was continued for one week to the meeting of March 22. MS(Cox/Malcolm) to accept the staff recommendation. Mr. A1 Rodriguez, 516 Broadway, Suite A, Chula Vista, representing South Bay Recovery Centers, spoke against liftin9 the ban stating that there are now 1,O00 Chula Vista residents that are in the alcoholic program and that many, if not most, of the arrests at the Marina are due to people drinking alcoholic beverages. Councilman Malcolm said he was concerned with legislating morality in people and discussed the developments taking place in that area since the ordinance was put into effect. He felt it would be very difficult for the police to go down there and look over 600 boats to see if any alcoholic beverages were being consumed commenting that the jails could not hold that many people. Councilwoman McCandliss supported the prohibition stating it is a tool that can be used to protect the citizens which is the primary concern of the Council. MS (Cox/Malcolm) to support the staff recommendation (permit the ordinance to lapse as of April 20, 1983). The motion carried by the following vote: AYES: Cox, Malcolm, Moore Noes: McCandliss, Scott Absent: None 17. REPORT STAFFING OF PARKS MAINTENANCE DIVISION (Director of Parks and Recreation) Director of Parks and Recreation submitted a detailed written report in which he discussed the major elements of park maintenance requirements. He concluded that progress has been made in developing the systems necessary to measure Park Maintenance staffing requirements. Based on the analysis of data currently available, the following tentative conclusions have been reached: (1) Maintenance functions are currently being performed at an acceptable level and frequency to allow for a sense of accomplishment by Park personnel and public satisfaction, except the installation and repair of irrigation equipment. (2) One additional Maintenance Gardener I or equivalent staff support from City forces is required to adequately maintain the irrigation equipment. AGENDA - lO - March 22, 1983 MSUC (Moore/Malcolm) to accept the in-depth report. The City Council commended the staff of the Park and Recreation Department for an excellent report. 18. REPORT REQUEST TO PARTICIPATE IN FUNDING HELICOPTER (ASTREA} {Assistant City Manager} On January 4, 1983, the City Council received a letter from the City of Poway asking that all cities consider contributing 20~ per person, based on the population of their city, towards the purchase of one helicopter for the Sheriff's Department. The letter was referred to staff for a report on the fiscal impact of this request and a recommendation to the City Council. Members of the City Council raised the question of this City's participation from a legal perspective, in addition to its priority in terms of other City priorities. In a detailed report the City Council, Assistant City Manager Asmus stated that dependent upon how many cities within the County agree to participate in the program, City costs would be approximately $17,000 to $20,000. If all cities and the County participated on a per capita basis, this City's cost would be approximately $17,200. He recommended that final decision of this request be deferred until budget deliberations. MS {Scott/Moore) to hold this over until budget time. Councilman Malcolm referred to the vote of the people of Chula Vista for the Astrea helicopter which was put on the ballot on November 2, 1982 stating that 60% voted for funding and 40% voted against the funding. He added that staff has pointed out to the Council that it has used the Astrea services many times and that it has been quite helpful and he would like to see some kind of approval given for it. SUBSTITUTE MOTION. MS (Malcolm/Cox) to forward a letter to the appropriate people indicating Chula Vista's conceptual approval of the request depending on budgetary constraints. Under discussion of the motion, Councilman Moore stated he would like to see more specific figures on exactly what it cost the City of Chula Vista for this service at the times it was requested. Councilman Scott indicated that the entire budget must be evaluated and measured before approval can be given to funding the helicopter that the needs of Chula Vista must have the priority. He added that the Council should not approve this in concept - it would not be fair to Poway or to the city's budgetary process. Councilwoman McCandliss stated that there are five helicopters in the fleet. Chula Vista would not be cut out of the program if it did not contribute to this. Councilman Malcolm withdrew his motion; Mayor Cox agreed to withdraw the second. SUBSTITUTE MOTION. MSUC {Cox/Scott) to write a letter to the City of Poway commending them on their interest to secure a new helicopter for the Sheriff's Department and informing them that this City will give it serious consideration at the time it deals with the budget for next year. AGENDA - ll - March 22, 1983 19. MAYOR'S REPORT a. Mayor Cox commented on the signing for the legislative offices stating that he would like to see signs more consistent with that of the Civic Center and would like to see this reconsidered at budget time. MSUC (Cox/Scott) to consider this item at budget time - for a more consistent signing with the Civic Center to get a cost breakdown. b. MSUC (Cox/McCandliss) for a Closed Session at the end of the meeting for matters of personnel. c. MSUC (Cox/Scott) to refer to the legislative committee SB 48 (lowering utility hook-up fees). d. Mayor Cox reminded the City Council of the llth Annual City Awards Banquet which will be held on Thursday, March 31, and stated that they should call in their reservations before March 24. 20. COUNCIL COMMENTS a. Councilwoman McCandliss stated that two years ago the city staff had submitted a questionnaire to all departments on which they listed their budgetary programs. The Council then prioritized the programs relative to the budgetary financial picture. She asked that this program be resurrected this year. MS (McCandliss/Moore) that the questionnaire be resurrected and redistributed to the City Council. Under discussion of the motion, Councilman Scott felt that the new City Manager should direct the way he would like to have the budgetary program submitted to the Council and not go along with another City Manager's recommendation. If he feels it appropriate to instigate this program, he can do so. The motion failed by the following vote: AYES: McCandliss, Malcolm Noes: Cox, Scott, Moore, Absent: None b. Councilman Moore reminded the Council of the Promotion Coalition Committee meeting on Thursday, March 24 at 7:00 p.m. c. Councilman Moore discussed the split vote of the City Council on the request of Hartson's Ambulance Service. AGENDA - 12 - March 22, 1983 MSUC(Moore/Scott) for staff to obtain data if available and advise the Council if it is not after a six-month period of time and see if the Council can justify its concerns for either of the split vote. The Council recessed to Closed Session at 8:55 p.m. The City Clerk was excused; the City Manager reported the meeting ended at 9:20 p.m. ADJOURNMENT at 9:20 p.m. to the meeting scheduled for Thursday, March 24, 1983 at 4:00 p.m. to the Council Conference schedule for Tuesday, March 29, at 7:00 p.m. and to the regular meeting scheduled for Tuesday, April 5, 1983 at 7:00 p.m. WPC:0274C PAG : City Clerk