Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutcc min 1983/04/19 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ?HE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA Tuesday, April 19, 1983 Council Chamber 7;00 p.m Public Service Building ROLL CALL Councilmembers present: Mayor Cox, Councilmembers McCandliss, Scott, Malcolm and Moore Councilmembers absent: None Staff present: City Manager Goss, City Attorney Lindberg, Assistant City Manager Asmus PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE, SILENT PRAYER The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by Mayor Cox followed by a moment of silent prayer. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES for the meeting of April 12, 1983 MSUC(Scott/Moore) to approve the minutes. 2. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY PROCLAMATION DECLARING THE WEEK OF APRIL 17-23, 1983 AS "NATIONAL VOLUNTEER WEEK" The proclamation was presented by Mayor Cox to Anna Bowley, Volunteer Coordinator for the City of Chula Vista. Councilman Scott noted that this volunteer program which is known now throughout the United States was started by Councilman Moore and former Councilman Egdahl and commended them both for the project. Mayor Cox acknowledged the Director of Personnel, Signe Thorsen for her efforts in this program. 3. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS (None) PUBLIC HEARING AND RELATED RESOLUTION 4. PUBLIC HEARING PCA-83-4, CONSIDERATION OF AN AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 19.60 PROHIBITING FREEWAY ORIENTED PRICE SIGNS - CITY INITIATED (Director of Planning) This being the time and place as advertised, Mayor Cox opened the public hearing. City Council Meeting - 2 - April 19, 1983 Director of Planning Gray explained that on February 1, 1983, the City Council adopted an interim ordinance valid for 90 days relating to the prohibition of freeway oriented price signs in the "P" zones. The ordinance will expire on May 2, 1983 unless extended by the City Council. A zoning text amendment to Chapter 19.60 of the Municipal Code has been prepared replacing the interim ordinance relating to freeway oriented price signs. Director Gray stated that on March 23, the planning Commission voted not to adopt the permanent ordinance. This recommendation is contrary to that of the staff which is recommending adoption. In answer to Councilwoman McCandliss' auestion, City Attorney Lindberg stated that billboards are not covered by this ordinance - they are under the protection of State laws. A general Council discussion ensued with staff answering Questions to numbers vs. lettering on freeway orient ed signs. Director Gray explained a further condition of approval: the existing signs shall be removed not later than three years from the adoption of this provision. Councilman Malcolm auestioned a loss of possible gas tax revenue to the City by not allowing the price signs. City Engineer Lippitt explained gas tax funds are based on population of the City and any loss of revenue would be associated with the sales tax. Mr. Don O'Neal, 91 Bonita Road, Cbula Vista, representing Ramada Inn, Love's Restaurant and Texaco station said he conducted a poll on this question. One thousand ballots were issued. The result of the public opinion poll was 97% in favor and 3% opposed to freeway price signs. Mr. O'Neal urged the Council to permit the price signs which would help the general public and support the gas station dealers. He added that they presently sell 250,000 gallons of gas per month at the Texaco service station on 8onita Road. When the price sign went up, the volume of trade increased 30% and the City gets 2~ per gallon on every gallon that is sold. Irene Maxwell, 473 Berland Way, Chula Vista, voiced her opposition to the freeway sign stating that the sign in most cases is a "come-on" and when you actually enter the service station you find the type of gas you are looking for as being higher priced. There being no further comments, either for or against, the hearing was declared closed. Councilman Moore said he recognized the advantage of having price signs on the freeway to the traveling motorist. However, he felt it was inappropriate to have these signs in Chula Vista. MS (McCandliss/Moore) that the ordinance be brought back for the amendment to Chapter 19.60 prohibiting freeway orientated price signs as recommended in the staff report. Council discussion followed regarding the three year limitation. Councilman Moore stated be would favor a one-year limitation. Director Gray explained City Council Meeting - 3 - April 19, 1983 that the three-year staff recommendation was not a scientifically-derived figure; it was based on the fact that the Texaco station has invested a great deal of money in the price sign and staff felt a three-year abatement would he fair. The Planning Commission suggested a five-year limitation. Mayor Cox agreed with the five-year limitation commenting that be felt this was equitable. A motion was made by Mayor Cox to amend the motion on the floor to allow a five year phase-out of the price sign. The motion died for lack of a second. The motion to bring back a resolution to approve of the amendment carried the following vote: Ayes: McCandliss, Scott, Moore Noes: Cox, Malcolm Absent: None 5. PUBLIC HEARING TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR ROBINHOOD MALL CONDOS, CV TRACT 83-2, 1665-1667 BRANDYWINE AVENUE ROBERT AND PATRICIA CASEY (Director of Planning) This being the time and place as advertised, Mayor Cox opened the public hearing. Principal Planner Lee explained that the applicant has submitted a tentative map in order to subdivide approximately 1.66 acres located at the southeast corner of Brandywine Avenue and SeQuoia Street into two lots and construct a 14-unit condominium project on the southerly lot (Lot 2, 0.8 acres). On March 23, 1983, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval in accordance with their Resolution PCS-83-2. The Commission also readopted the Negative Declaration issued on IS-81-48. There being no comments, either for or against, the hearing was declared closed. MSUC (Moore/Malcolm) for a resolution to be brought hack approving the tentative subdivision map for Robinhood Mall Condos as recommended by the Planning Commission. 6. OPu~L COMMUNICATIONS a. Bob Maxwell, 473 Berland Way, Cbula Vista, referred to a Star News article in which the Executive Director of the Chamber of Commerce, Niek Slijk, said that Chula Vista should try to get some of the land in the Otay Mesa area. Mr. Maxwell asked that the Council consider this. City Council Meeting - 4 - April 19, 1983 b. J. R. Norman, Chula Vista, said he attended a San Diego Energy Advisory Committee meeting this week at which the SANDER project was discussed. The actual site for the SANDER project will be decided May 13. Mr. Norman also discussed the alignment of "H" Street stating it was like a "snake trail" and it would not alleviate any traffic on East "L" Street. Mr. Norman further requested that he be notified of the Granny Flats public hearing. City Engineer Lippitt explained the alignment of "H" Street is based on the topography of the area and it will alleviate traffic on Telegraph Canyon Road. CONSENT CALENDAR MSUC (Scott/McCandliss) to approve the Consent Calendar. All matters listed under consent calendar are considered to be routine by the Council and will all be enacted hy one motion in the form listed below. There will be no separate discussion of said items unless good cause is shown prior to the time the Council votes on the motion to adopt. 7. RESOLUTION 11203 GRANTING EASEMENTS ON LOT 7 OF THE TOWN CENTRE FOCUS AREA TO SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC CO. AND PACIFIC TELEPHONE (Community Development Director) To complete the installation of gas and electric facilities within the Town Centre Focus Area, certain easements must be provided to the appropriate utility companies. A major utility easement corridor has been planned through Lot 7 for joint use by gas, electric, telephone and cable t.v. The City Engineering Department has reviewed the easement corridor relative to the facilities that will be installed. And, as lessor of Lot 7, Imperial Municipal Services Group, Inc. (lessor for purposes of Certificates of Participation financing) also must approve the subject easements. 8. RESOLUTION 11204 AUTHORIZING THE DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO PURCHASE SIX POLICE SPECIAL VEHICLES (Director of Public Safety/Purchasing Agent) The current budget provides for the purchase of six police patrol vehicles. The City is able to obtain said vehicles from the State of California on their Bid No. F29-002445 via a cooperative purchasing arrangement as authorized hy Council Resolution No. 6132. 9. RESOLUTION 11205 ACCEPTING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS, SLIPLINING OF WALNUT AVENUE SEWER BETWEEN "G" STREET AND "J" STREET (City Engineer) On February 15, 1983, Council approved a 20 working day extension of time which changed the contract completion date to March 10, 1983. Pacific Engineers and Contractors essentially completed the installation of the sliplining on March 11, 1983. The sewerage was then returned to the new line, City Council Meeting - 5 - April 19, 1983 placed into operation, and the bypass removed on this date. A final inspection was performed on March 14, 1983, and all punch list items were found to have been completed. All work meets with the approval of Rohr Industry's representative as to parking lot and paving replacement. The work was completed in accordance with the plans and specifications, approved revisions, and to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. 10. RESOLUTION 11206 ORDERING THE CITY ENGINEER TO PREPARE AND FILE A REPORT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 4, CHAPTER 1, PART 2, "LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972", BEING DIVISION 15, STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FOR THE FURNISHING OF ELECTRICAL ENERGY, REPLACEMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF STREET LIGHTS; AND FOR THE FURNISHING OF LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE IN CHULA VISTA BAY BOULEVARD STREET LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1983-1984, IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY 1, 1983 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1984 (City Engineer) Last year, the Redevelopment Agency completed the improvements on Bay Boulevard including lighting and landscaping between "E" and "F" Streets. An assessment district was formed to pay for the electrical energy needed to light the street and maintain the landscaping. This resolution in accordance with the Streets and Highways Code, begins the process for renewing this district. After adoption of this resolution, the City's Assessment Engineer will prepare the report for the Council's consideration and approval and setting of a date for the required public hearing. The Council will then hold the public hearing to consider the confirmation of the assessments. ll. RESOLUTION 11207 ORDERING THE CITY ENGINEER TO PREPARE AND FILE A REPORT IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 4, CHAPTER 1, PART 2, "LANDSCAPING AND LIGHTING ACT OF 1972", BEING DIVISION 15, STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FOR THE FURNISHING OF ELECTRICAL ENERGY, REPLACEMENT AND MAINTENANCE OF STREET LIGHTS; AND FOR THE FURNISHING OF LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE IN CHULA VISTA TOWN CENTRE No. 1 STREET LIGHTING AND LANDSCAPING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1983-1984, IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR COMMENCING JULY l, 1983 AND ENDING JUNE 30, 1984 (City Engineer) The Town Centre No. 1 Assessment District was formed three years ago to pay the costs of maintenance of the landscaping and energy for street lighting. It is now time to renew the assessment district for the next fiscal year. This resolution, in accordance with the Streets and Highways Code, begins the process of renewal. After adoption of this resolution, the City's Assessment Engineer will prepare the report for Council's consideration and approval and setting of a date for a public hearing. The Council will then hold the public hearing to consider the confirmation of the assessments. City Council Meeting - 6 - April 19, 1983 12. RESOLUTION 11208 APPROVING AND GRANTING EASEMENT TO SOUTH BAY IRRIGATION DISTRICT AN EASEMENT WITHIN LOT A OF HIDDEN VISTA VILLAGE MAP NO. 10051 (City Engineer) Item #7 of the Supplemental Subdivision Improvement Agreement for Hidden Vista Village dated March 19, 1981 between the City and Watt Industries provides for the City to grant to South Bay Irrigation District an access easement across Lot A to their water tank. The Sweetwater Authority has further requested that the easement be expanded to allow installation of a water line and other utilities within its boundaries. The easement runs from the Sweetwater Authority's Lynwood Hills tank to Moonview Drive. End of Consent Calendar. RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES, FIRST READING 13. RESOLUTION 11209 ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR LUMINAIRE CONVERSION AT MENZEL PARK BALLFIELD AND EUCALYPTUS PARK BALLFIELD (FORMERLY FRIENDSHIP PARK) (City Engineer/Director of Parks & Recreation) The ballfield luminaire conversion project was approved by the FY 1982-83 CIP (PRO9). The conversion of the two ballfield lighting systems from quartz to metal halide luminaires will both lower energy costs and improve lighting levels. Bids for this project were opened on March 15, 1983. The recommendation is that Council reject the low bidder, Federal Electric, because of an incomplete bid package and nonconformance to the contract specifications; accept all other bids, award the contract to Maco Services, Inc.; and authorize the expenditure of $19,600 from Account 614-6140-PR09 (State Block Grant monies). RESOLUTION OFFERED BY COUNCILWOMAN McCANDLISS, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously. 14. RESOLUTION APPROVING THE USE OF LTF ARTICLE 8 CLAIM FUNDS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF BIKE LANES ON OTAY LAKES ROAD FROM BONITA ROAD TO EAST "H" STREET, AND TRANSFERRING FUNDS (City Engineer) On June 16, 1975, SANDAG approved a $20,475 allocation for the construction of bicycle facilities within the City of Chula Vista. The various facilities were completed but (1) some of the improvements were included in other projects and (2) the City has been earning interest on the remaining fund balance for these past few years. The current balance in that account is $26,683.08. The proposal is to use this balance for the construction of bicycle route improvements on Otay Lakes Road. Conditional approval for the use of these funds from the SANDAG Bicycle Facility Committee for this purpose has been obtained. Councilman Malcolm stated that he was not able to review this particular resolution in-depth and would like a continuance of one week. MSUC (Moore/Scott) to continue this resolution for one week. City Council Meeting - 7 - April 19, 1983 15. RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING JUST COMPENSATION FOR THE ACQUSITION OF RIGHT OF WAY FOR THE EAST NAPLES EXTENSION FOR CHULA VISTA WOODS AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY TO OFFER THE COMPENSATION TO THE OWNER (City Attorney) Chula Vista Woods is proposing to develop a mobile home park on their property and to provide access by installing the proposed extension of East Naples Street. State law now requires that before a City Council can consider a resolution of necessity, it must first establish the amount of compensation that will constitute a good faith offer and make such an offer to the property owner. Gardner Investment Properties, the owner of Chula Vista Woods, has had an appraisal report prepared and requests that the City Council establish the amount set forth in the appraisal report as just compensation and offer this amount to United Enterprises for the proposed right of way. Attempts made by Gardner Investments Properties to make the offer to United Enterprises directly have failed. Councilman Scott stated he is abstaining from discussion and voting of this matter due to a possible conflict of interest. Councilman Scott left the dais as this time. RESOLUTION OFFERED BY COUNCILMAN MOORE, the reading of the text was waived hy unanimous consent. Mayor Cox noted the letters received from Tom Davies, attorney for Gardner Investment Properties and from Michael Spata, attorney for United Enterprises, Inc. City Attorney Lindberg explained the appraisal which he stated was done by a qualified appraiser declaring this as the normal process of establishing just compensation. Councilman Malcolm commented on the request of United Enterprises to abstain from discussion of this matter because "he has served as an intermediary for Gardner Investment Properties prior to his election to the City Council ." Mr. Malcolm said he checked this out with the City Attorney and was advised he has no possible conflict of interest. Mr. Malcolm explained there was a communication problem between Gardner investment firm and United Enterprises and he (Malcolm) wrote a letter on behalf of Mr. Gardner to validate the process. He received no compensation for doing this. Attorney for Gardner Investment Properties, Mr. Tom Davies stated that they have realigned the proposed access at great expense to the company in order to proceed with their proposed Mobilehome Park. Mr. Davies discussed the lack of response from United Enterprises. The appraiser, Thomas Roberts, made numerous attempts to meet with United Enterprises, the owner of the property, and was notified that a representative of United Enterprises would contact him and arrange a meeting; however, this did not take place. A letter was then sent to United Enterprises on March 30 following a number of telephone calls. No response has been received to date. City Council Meeting - 8 - April 19, 1983 Michael Spata representing United Enterprises, stated that the action being taken by the Council this evening was premature; that the letter of Mr. Roberts written on March 30 was answered by United Enterprises on April 15; the property owner was not accorded the right to inspect the property, as is the law; there is no project on file with the City for this Mobilehome Park development so how can an alignment be established; there is no guarantee that the project will he approved at this juncture; no good-faith value can be established by the appraisal; it will take at least one year for approval or disapproval of the project after which time a complaint may be issued which can take another year; approval of the resolution would be premature because the alignment could very well be changed. City Attorney Lindberg responded if the alignment were changed at a later date, staff and Council would have to start from "ground zero" which is one of the defects of the law confronting the Council at this time. Council discussion followed with the attorneys representing both companies regarding the lack of communication and delays in the project. Attorney Spata stated the letter written by United Enterprises on April 15 suggested a meeting date on April 27. Mr. Jack Gardner, the developer, objected to the delay, indicating nothing would he accomplished and it was merely putting off the negotiations for two more weeks. In answer to the Council's auery, Mr. Gardner said he did not send the letter by registered mail; however, attempts were made daily to contact United Enterprises. City Attorney Lindberg recommended the continuance of two weeks so the parties could meet on this April 27 date. MSC (McCandliss/Moore) to continue this matter for two weeks. Councilman Moore felt that something should be put into the resolution regarding the delays, such as, "with time, delays and potential modification of the alignment would affect United Enterprises land; this is only the initial step of the appraisal." City Attorney Lindberg said he would look into incorporating this into the resolution. Councilman Malcolm asked Mr. Gardner to bring to the Council the copy of the "return receipt" reauested from mailing the letter. 16. RESOLUTION ll210 AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN TO REDESIGNATE A CERTAIN PARCEL OF LAND LOCATED WITHIN THE NORTHWESTERLY QUADRANT OF E STREET AND BAY BOULEVARD FROM "PARKS AND PUBLIC OPEN SPACE" TO "VISITOR COMMERCIAL" AND AMENDING THE LOCAL COASTAL PROGRAM TO PROVIDE CONSISTENCY WITH THE PROPOSED REDESIGNATION (Director of Planning) At the April 5, 1983 meeting, the City Council, after a public hearing, approved the redesignation of a certain parcel of land located within the northwesterly ~uadrant of "E" Street and Bay Boulevard from "Parks and Open Space" to "Visitor Commercial" and directed that a resolution be prepared to effect said redesignation. City Council Meeting - 9 - April 19, 1983 RESOLUTION OFFERED BY COUNCILMAN MOORE, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously. MSUC (Moore/Cox) to refer this Sammis General Plan Amendment to the Redevelopment Agency and Planning Commission for incorporation into the new Local Coastal Plan. 17. RESOLUTION 11211 GRANTING AN EXTENSION OF TIME AND EXTENDING THE BONUS PERIOD FOR CONSTRUCTION OF WATER, SEWER AND STORM DRAIN FACILITIES TOWN CENTRE FOCUS AREA (City Engineer) Barron-Masanovich, the Contractor, had reauested an extension of 13 working days to their contract due to rains and inclement conditions which prevented them from performing work on the project. The Engineering Department has reviewed their request and determined that it is justified. Community Development requested consideration of extending the bonus expiration date to Barron-Masanovitch because of the delays experienced by the Contractor over which he had no control. Barron-Masanovich will only receive a bonus payment if they complete all wor~ within Lot 7, the parking structure site, before April 21, 1983. Council discussion involved wording of future contracts which would allow for a number of rainy days and the bonus factor. RESOLUTION OFFERED BY COUNCIL~AN SCOTT, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously. 18. RESOLUTION 11212 APPROPRIATING FUNDS FOR SCHOOL SAFETY PATROL SUMMER CAMP FOR FY 1983~1984 (City Attorney) The City Council at its meeting of April 12, 1983 approved the continuation of the School Safety Patrol Summer Camp at Camp Palomar for FY 1983-84 and directed that a resolution be brought back to appropriate the necessary monies for the 1983-84 program and to encumber said funds for expenditure in July of 1983. RESOLUTION OFFERED BY COUNCIL~%~N SCOTT, the reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously. 19. ORDINANCE 2033 AMENDING SECTION 10.52.100 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO THE REMOVAL OF VEHICLES PARKED FOR MORE THAN 72 HOURS (City Attorney) SECOND READING & ADOPTION The Municipal Code presently makes it unlawful to park a vehicle for more than 72 consecutive hours, hut does not clearly authorize the removal of the vehicle. This amendment would clarify the authority to remove vehicles in violation of this section of the City Code in conformance with the Vehicle Code. The Ordinance was placed on first reading at the meeting of April 12, 1983. City Council Meeting - 10 - April 19, 1983 MSUC (McCandliss/Moore) to place the ordinance on second reading and adoption. The reading of the text was waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously. 20. REPORT OF THE CITY MANAGER a. City Manager Goss referred to the memo from the Director of Public Safety regarding the overnight use of the "J" Street Marina by the Pasadena Boat Club. The Port Authority is allowing three RV's to stay overnight at the "J" Street Marina in order to guard the eauipment owned by the boat club; and the RV Park is providing the rest of the RV's with a special nightly fee of $15. b. City Manager Goss reported the California Conservation Group is now on the Bayfront cleaning up the area. In answer to the Mayor's Question, Assistant City Manager Asmus stated the CCC can clean up further debris on the Bayfront area if they were remunerated for such - it would not be gratis because they are faced with a lack of funds. c. City Manager Goss announced the allocation of $359,000 under the Emergency Jobs bill to the City of Chula Vista. This would be given under the Community Block Grant portion of the legislation. REPORTS OF CITY OFFICERS AND DEPARTMENT HEADS 21. REPORT REGARDING SALE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES (Director of Planning) On January 4, 1983, the City Council directed staff to look into whether all establishments which sell alcoholic beverages should be regulated and controlled through the Conditional Use Permit process. Planning staff analysis revealed that in the absence of any documentation of problems due to the number of establishments which sell alcoholic beverages in the City, there appears to be no reason to establish more control on these uses. Their recommendation is that no action be taken. MSUC (Scott/Moore) to accept the report. 22. REPORT RATIONALE FOR THE CITY'S FEE POLICY FOR MAJOR PLANNING STUDIES (Director of Planning) The City Council, during its consideration of the proposed Sammis General Plan Amendment, expressed concern over the City's policy with respect to fees charged for the formulation or amendment of major municipal plans. The Council Questioned the rationale behind the Planning Department's undertaking of studies which involve the replanning of vast areas of land at no charge to the private sector while at the same time, it processes individual requests for General Plan Amendments and levies fees which are designed to produce a full-cost recovery. City Council Meeting - ll - April 19, 1983 Director of Planning Gray stated the City's current fee policy for major planning studies was prudent and equitable. Under this policy, the General Fund underwrites the cost of projects which have been initiated hy public bodies or agencies in response to discernible public needs; and the private sector defrays the costs of those studies which have been initiated in response to private needs, even though the said studies might incidentally benefit the public-at-large. MSUC (Moore/Malcolm) to accept the report. 23. MAYOR'S REPORT a. Mayor Cox reported the Coastal Commission will be meeting at Shelter Island Marina Inn on April 26. They will discuss the widening of I-5, the Flood Control Project, Route 54 and the City's Bayfront Plan. The recommendation to the Coastal Commission will he to find that the Bayfront Plan is inconsistent; however, there will be nine different stipulations given to the Coastal Commission which if approved, would allow The Commission to find that there is some consistency in the Plan. b. Mayor Cox reported on the actions taken by the Board of Supervisors today concerning the Hazardous Waste ordinance. They agreed with Chula Vista's statement of no need to receive concurrence with all of the cities in the County; they amended the ordinance to exempt certain items such as waste oil; as to the reduction of fees from $75, they made no change but asked for a report to come back in six months. c. Mayor Cox announced the joint meeting with the Council and the three School Districts on Monday, May 2, 1983 at 4 p.m. MSUC (Cox/Moore) to place on the agenda the following two items: (1) an update on a study made in February 1982 regarding sharing of major equipment, microfilming, joint purchasing and printing; (2) to look into the possibility of having the School Districts take advantage of the public access TV Channel. d. In response to the City Manager's memo regarding Capital Improvement projects Mayor Cox suggested the alleyway behind Third Avenue be looked into. MSUC (Cox/Moore) for staff to come back with a report with the cost to do the alley behind Third Avenue and whether there would be any cost sharing by the property owner. e. Mayor Cox discussed the Park area at the "J" Street Marina stating the Council should now address this issue. MSUC (Cox/McCandliss) in conjunction with the Capital Improvement Program, staff to consider what it would cost to make that area a truly Park area in concert with standards established in Chula Vista. City Council Meeting - 12 - April 19, 1983 f. Mayor Cox noted the time crunch which will be realized regarding future annexations in the City based on the fact that LAFCO must now do a sphere of influence study for all of the cities in the County. Mayor Cox added annexations such as Eastlake and the San Diego substation will be proposed for annexation but it would take at least 12 years for LAFCO to do a Sphere of Influence study. He suggested that the City may consider funding $30,000 to $40,000 to have the study done. MS (Cox/Malcolm) to ask staff to look into the practicality of doing a Sphere of Influence study and consider that item at budget time; as to whether or not it would be an appropriate item to fund this next fiscal year. Councilman Scott auestioned the legality of the City doing a Sphere of Influence study as it should be done by LAFCO. City Manager Goss felt that a more appropriate motion would be to direct the staff to come back with a report outlining the schedule of time reauired for the variety of elements in this project. The staff needs to get together with the LAFCO staff and report on scheduling. Mayor Cox amended his motion to "pursue the course of action as outlined hy the City Manager." Councilman Malcolm agreed as to the Second and the motion carried unanimously. 24. COUNCIL COMMENTS a. Councilman Malcolm reported the Legislative Committee met and discussed AB 1599 which would allow the State Department to determine each city's share of regional housing needs. If this is not done, they will take away gas-tax funds from the City. MSUC (Malcolm/Moore) to oppose AB 1599 and send a letter to the local Assembl3nnen as well as the Chairman, Mr. Chacon. ADJOURNMENT AT 9:30 p.m. to the meeting scheduled for Tuesday, April 26, 1983 at 7:00 p.m.; the Council Conference of Thursday, April 28, 1983 at 4:00 p.m. and the Joint City/Council meeting of Monday, May 2, 1983. E 1 k WPC:0283C PAG · 1 T