HomeMy WebLinkAboutcc min 1983/09/29 MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
Thursday, September 29, 1983 Council Chamber
4:00 p.m. Public Service Building
ROLL CALL
Councilmembers present: Mayor Cox, Councilmembers Scott, Malcolm,
Moore, McCandliss
Councilmembers absent: None
Staff present: City Manager Goss, City Attorney Harron,
Assistant City Manager Asmus
UNANIMOUS CONSENT ITEM
RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE PAYMENT OF DEFENSE FEES FOR
COUNCILMAN FRANK A. SCOTT AND APPROPRIATING MONIES
THEREFOR
Mayor Cox stated the resolution authorizing pa3anent of defense fees for
Councilman Scott will be continued to the meeting of October 11, 1983.
PARKING PROBLEM
Mr. Ray Yoder representing the Parking Place Commission expressed the concerns
of the members regarding the potential parking problem which may occur with
Artists theatre nex T ursday, Since the
the opening of the United t h October 6.
parking garage will not be completed until November or December, parking will
be a problem.
MSC (Cox/McCandliss) to refer this item to staff for recommendations to
alleviate the potential parking problem. (Councilman Scott was not present at
this time.
HAZARDOUS WASTE CONFERENCE
1. INTRODUCTORY REMARKS (City Staff)
Mayor Cox stated the purpose of the Conference is to provide information to
the City Council concerning the various hazardous waste facilities in Chula
Vista, particularly in the Otay Valley Road area adding unless there is time
at the end of the presentation, it is not his intent to entertain public
comment but would encourage the participants to write questions down and refer
them to the appropriate participants at the end of the session.
Mayor Cox announced the initiation of a Task Force consisting of nine members
to be appointed by the Mayor and Council for one year. The Committee shall
meet at its own discretion to: (1) verify that adequate monitoring is being
performed; (2) review monitoring results and (3) disseminate information
Council Conference _ 2 September 29, 1983
concerning hazardous waste matters to the City Council and interested
citizens. The scope of responsibility of the Committee includes: (1} obtain
and review any and all monitoring results, reports and investigations relative
to hazardous waste treated, stored or handled at the Otay landfill Class I
site, Omar Class I site, BKK Transfer station, illegal dump sites and SDG&E
South Bay power plant; (2) obtain any reports made relative to hazardous waste
which occurs in the Chula Vista area and could potentially impact the Chula
Vista environment; (3) establish liaison with various regulatory agencies and
operations to insure prompt receipt of monitoring results, reports and
investigations; (4) disseminate information gathered to the City Council and
interested citizens; (5) evaluate effectiveness of existing monitoring and
reporting systems; (6) prepare a report on status of hazardous waste in the
community; (7) prepare special reports (as appropriate) concerning spills,
illegal dumping, escape of leachate from closed Class I sites or other
hazardous waste activities presenting a potential hazard to the community.
This committee will be constituted within the next two to three weeks and
ratified by the City Council. The focus of this committee is not only to
contact regulatory agencies but to receive input from the community.
2. INTRODUCTION OF PARTICIPANTS
City Engineer Lippitt indicated the purpose of this Conference is to get the
actual people representing the different regulatory agencies to present their
position in monitoring and regulating hazardous waste sites.
Senior Civil Engineer William E. Harshman discussed the written report
submitted by staff:
1C SPECIFIC SITES/FACILITIES (Otay, Omar, BKK)
The August 1984 staff report covered the Otay Class I site which operated
during a period of approximately 20 years (1960-1980) and includes a list of
hazardous waste which were deposited in that dump during that period. In 1978
ll of hazardous liquid waste. The basic
it received about 1-1/2 million ga ons
facility was earthen pits in an area of high clay content judged to be of very
high quality as far as retention of the wastes impounded. The ground water
pollution is monitored on a quarterly basis through a series of system
sampling wells and currently is no longer operational. The ponds were filled
with debris, acting as a sponge and were subsequently covered with soil.
Formal closure is still in process.
The Omar Class I site operated from 1959-78. Materials deposited in that
facility totalled approximately one million gallons a year. The facility
consisted of earthen pits in a high clay content area. Original ponds were
drained and residue from those ponds was transferred to a new containment on
the same site and then covered with earth. Operation of the facility has been
terminated and the site was formally closed in 1982.
Council Conference _ 3 September 29, 1983
The BKK Transfer Station, a newly constructed facility commenced operation in
January 1983 and primarily handles acids and caustics. The general purpose of
the operation is to neutralize and dewater those acids and caustics.
--, Concentrated residue from the process is trans~;rted to West Covina to a Class
I disposal area. It is monitored on a dai self-monitoring basis by BKK
personnel. The neutralized liquid material is transported to the San Diego
Metropolitan Sewer system. Some further monitoring is conducted by the
industrial waste section of the City of San Diego.
Mr. Harshman then introduced the guest panel and regulatory agencies who gave
a brief description of each agency's control in the overall regulatory
process.
2. INTRODUCTION OF PARTICIPANTS
u of hazardous waste in the
State of California.
B. David Marx of the County Department of Health Services stated the County
Department of Health Services through a Memorandum of Understanding with
the State has the authority to enforce hazardous waste regulations in San
Diego County.
C. Dave Barker of the Regional Water Quality Control Board stated his
aagency has the authority to implement regulations adopted persuant to
the California Water Code regarding the effects of hazardous waste on
ground and surface water quality.
D. Mike Lake of the Air Pollution Control District stated his agency has the
authority to implement and enforce the national air standards in San
Diego County.
E. Sharon Reid of County Public Works Department and Jim McAuley from BKK
Corporation noted they were present and would speak at a later time in
the meeting.
3. DISCUSSION OF HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT
A. COUNTY HEALTH
David Marx of the County Department of Health explained the typical types of
waste problems associated with heavy manufacturing industry states along the
eastern seaboard. In San Diego, there has been a series of incidents
involving public exposure to hazardous wastes which were illegally disposed of
and which in turn created a sensitivity and awareness throughout the County.
The County Board of Supervisors directed the Department of Health Services to
look into the problem of hazardous waste disposal in San Diego and directed
the Department to come up with a plan for minimizing the potential public
health impact of exposure to hazardous waste to the citizens of San Diego
Council Conference _ 4 September 29, 1983
County. The Health Services Advisory Board established subcommittees
representing members of the community as well as members of industry, law
enforcement and fire fighting agencies to assist the Health Department in the
development of this program. The County embarked a phone survey of potential
hazardous waste generators. The State of California, Department of Health
Services established a list of the types of businesses who typically generate
a hazardous waste. It was determined in phone surveys that approximately 48%
of businesses generating hazardous waste did not have the awareness or
sensitivity that these wastes were actually hazardous. The Department
determined that part of the problem was educational: industries in San Diego
needed to be made aware that their wastes were hazardous and needed to be
i questionnaire/application to individual businesses that fell
within these industrial groups, to assist them in determining whether or not
they were actually generating hazardous waste. A number of permit
applications have been received and these specific establishments are being
inspected and are receiving a consultation visit to assist them in assuring
that any hazardous waste being generated is manifested and disposed of
appropriately.
The department has been successful in working with a variety of different
agencies to remove as much duplication of regulatory effort as possible.
Training of personnel has gone along well particularly with the assistance of
the State of California and the Directors of Environmental Health who have
taken an active part in providing this training.
Other activities involve complaints regarding illegal disposal of hazardous
waste, illegal storage of hazardous waste, persons potentially exposed to
hazardous materials, filling with hazardous materials, illegal drum storage
sites, illegal use of businesses where hazardous wastes are stored, problems
in schools and other public buildings where people are potentially exposed to
hazardous materials and food that has been contaminated with hazardous
materials.
Another area is the emergency response phases of the program. The County
Dept. of Health Services has been working through the Unified Disaster Council
and has solicited the assistance of a variety of different agencies ranging
from Public Works to Office of Disaster Preparedness, Sheriff Departments,
Fire Chief Associations, Department of Agriculture, Air Pollution Control
Districts, Water Quality Control Boards, Coast Guard, California Fish and Game
and Caltrans to develop a comprehensive Countywide Emergency Response Incident
Plan for responding to hazardous waste emergencies here in San Diego County.
The next step will be a presentation to the City Manager's Association,
Unified Disaster Council, Board of Supervisors, and the City Councils for
approval. The County Health Department is also involved in community health
assessments. Whenever there is an exposure to hazardous materials by members
of the public in this County an epidemiological survey of the area is done.
The Health Department compiles records of these exposures and has a list of
the potential victims of these incidences. It acts as a liaison between
people exposed to these materials and the variety of State agencies which
Council Conference - 5 - September 29, 1983
provide assistance including that through the Hazardous Materials Victims
Compensation's Act. If a site is an actual abandoned waste disposal site
shown on the State superfund list, the State Health Department becomes the
liaison agency in those matters and the County department provides the State
assistance in enforcement activities, sampling, monitoring and health
assessment at those sites.
3B. STATE HEALTH
The State currently operates a program under the Resource Conservation and
Recovery Act which essentially vests the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
with the fundamental authority for regulating hazardous waste on a national
scale. Authority for the states to operate their individual programs is
normally granted in phases. The State is currently in Phase 2A of their
authorization which essentially provides they can develop regulations for
haulers, generators, and disposal sites and can list and identify hazardous
waste and grant permits for the treatment and storage of hazardous waste. The
final authorization must be obtained by 1984 or the program reverts back to
EPA. The State controls the development of regulations applying to haulers,
generators, treatment storage and disposal sites and the surveillance and
enforcements associated with those activities. A portion of that
responsibility has been delegated to the various counties. The State has
retained the exclusive authority to grant permits to treatment and storage
facilities and for the development of regulations for surveillance and
enforcement at those facilities that currently operate under State permits and
the registration of hazardous waste haulers. On the State level - locals are
affected by a set of adjunct activities that are embodied by SB 618 commonly
known as the State Superfund legislation. A portion of what is provided in
that legislation is the preplacement of the emergency response vehicles in
local communities, site clean-up, abandoned site clean-up and health effect
studies. The State Health Agency permitted the first hazardous waste storage
and treatment facility in the State of California right here in Otay (BKK
Appropriate Technologies II facility). Prior to the issuance of that permit
every effort was made to facilitate comments from governmental agencies and
local agencies as well as private citizens. A public hearing was held prior
to the issuance of that permit. With respect to the operation of that
facility the State has the authority to assure that the facility operates not
only in accordance with an approved operations plan but also in a manner that
will assure that there are no adverse environmental effects due to the
operation of that facility.
3C. CITY STAFF
Battalion Chief Sam Lopez and Battalion Chief Richard Harrold detailed the
local emergency response situation.
Batallion Chief Lopez explained the plan as submitted in regard to regulation
and inspection and the Fire and Police Departments' responsibility when an
incident occurs. The area of responsibility is initial control of the scene
and rescue of any victims (depending on the situation). Private
Council Conference _ 6 September 29, 1983
responsibility (on private property) is life safety, then property. If there
is a liquid chemical runoff, an attempt will be made to stop the flow of the
liquid and contain it to the smallest site possible. If it is a fume or vapor
condition, there is no way to control that and evacuation would be necessary.
The Fire Department handles on-scene management and the Police Department's
operation takes care of auxiliary functions of evacuation, utilizing their
facilities (control vehicles, Astrea helicopters, news agencies, etc.). The
Fire Department handles the emergency situation -- anything beyond this, the
policy is to contact the appropriate agency and get their expertise. When the
situation is identified as a hazardous materials problem, County experts are
called on the scene to identify the material involved. If an incident occurs
on a California freeway, (805 or I-5) the California Highway Patrol becomes
the Scene Commander and the Department will just be there to assist them. If
the same accident occurs on Otay Lakes Road in the County, it falls under the
Sheriff's Department by State law. If it's in an area of the City, it would
normally fall under the Police Department's jurisdiction; however, based on an
agreement with them, the Fire Department will take control. If it occurs on a
private section of property then the Department will be in charge.
In response to Mayor Cox's question, Chief Harrold stated the City of Chula
Vista's responsibility in the event of a spill would be to contain and secure
the area but the actual clean up would come from the County or State.
Mr. Marx answered Mayor Cox's question concerning the Emergency Response Plan
being in its final stages of completion. The time schedule for when that will
be a finished document is unknown at this time, but Mr. Marx stated he would
get back to Mayor Cox with the answer.
3D COUNCIL QUESTIONS
Councilman Malcolm asked Mrs. Reid of the County Public Works Department what
the exact clean up procedures are that the County does. She responded an
incident has three distinct phases: (1) The incident itself is a police
incident and is handled by agreement with the Fire Department. (2) The
identification phase which requires a chemist and (3) the clean-up phase,
requiring a licensed hazardous waste clean-up contractor. All agencies
within the County of San Diego use private contracts. The County of San Diego
uses IT Corporation as a result of competitive bids.
Mr. Marx of the County Department of Health Services said it is their
intention, once a policy is developed and implemented, to go around to the
different companies (BKK for example) and test their responses and ensure
people are trained properly to respond.
Councilman Moore indicated his dislike for governmental agencies going to an
extreme, but when there is an adverse effect on a higher plane, those who make
the regulations (State/County) should have some written requirement. For
example, within 30-days there would be a "joint drill" to respond to a waste
incident as a requirement. There are limitations as to response time and
equipment limitation. There should be something on paper as to how to
evaluate and critique. Each entity can see the strengths and weaknesses of
the other. Councilman Moore questioned why the County and State do not have
some requirement such as this in their permit issuing instructions.
7
Council Conference - September 29, 1983
Mr. Magee of thc Scunty Public ~cr~:s Department responded every permit
requires a contingency plan together with a list of agencies that have to be
notified of unplanned release of any type of hazardous material. Time between
the discovery of the upset and notification and time between notification and
actual response is the issue of concern.
Councilman Moore noted that Fire and Police response are the only control the
City has. He added the concept of not issuing a permit for handling
hazardous waste until a satisfactory joint "mock drill" is completed could be
instituted.
In answer to Councilwoman McCandliss' query, Battalion Chief Harrold said
there is no prearranged agreement with anyone for sand in case of a liquid
spill. The Department has a list of resources which initially starts with the
Public Works Department, Caltrans and finally private contractors.
Councilwoman McCandliss questioned Mr. Marx as to the numerous complaints on
spills or dumps. He responded as to the increased awareness of hazardous
material particularly with Brown Field cleanup. They are getting the kinds of
complaints which are Countywide. Mr. Marx discussed the following:
(A) Montgomery area - They would start with investigation of site. The
responsible party and owners of land would be sought to find out what is
in drums without opening them. (B) Chula Vista - They would work through
City Manager's office and City Council to see if money was available for
clean-up.
With lO drums, they would do an epidimiological assessment of the
neighborhood if it was found to be hazardous material in the drums.
(B) Fire on Main Street: Old Apache Joes - This is an inactive dump
and everything was moved out some time ago. Because they had activity
with Apache Services in the past they knew what was and was not there.
As soon as they got the call two people were dispatched to the scene, an
assessment was made, and San Diego Fire Dept. units were called to the
scene. It was determined there were no substantial hazardous materials.
The same assessment is done whether or not they know if there are
hazardous materials on site. A meterologic and visual onsite assessment
is done to determine if evacuation is necessary. Depending on how much
materials, what materials were there, potential health threat from those
materials and depending on meteriological conditions, they would take
whatever appropriate action was necessary to insure the health and safety
of citizens of the County of San Diego.
Chief Harrold discussed an event whereby there would be toxic chemicals or
waste involved in a fire stating life comes first (which includes firefighters
too). If the Department cannot get into a position to safely fight the fire,
they will hold and wait for response from others to determine whether or not
it is safe to do so.
Council Conference 8 _ September 29, 1983
If there is a building on fire that has hazardous waste materials involved in
it and if they know ahead of time what it is, particular composition of
chemicals would dictate the type of fire response they would have.
Mr. Hinton was asked by Mayor Cox if there are any mock or disaster drills
done in regard to various hazardous waste sites. Mr. Hinton stated he was not
aware of any specific incidents but was aware that most of the counties have
in place a contingency plan for hazardous waste.
Councilman Malcolm questioned Mr. Hinton about the BKK picking up hazardous
waste. Mr. Hinton answered any person hauling hazardous wastes in the State
of California must be registered. Pursuant to that registration they must
have their vehicle inspected by the State of California and Highway Patrol at
least once a year. Before they get that registration they must have a
certificate of compliance with the California Highway Patrol. Anyone who
hauls hazardous waste anywhere in the State of California must have a
certified vehicle capable of handling hazardous waste. The site operator is
not permitted to accept a shipment of hazardous waste unless it is accompanied
by a hazardous waste manifest.
Councilman Moore asked about the best way to keep Chula Vista informed of the
quarterly or annual tests done by the County and State. This monitoring date
or test results should be submitted to the City.
In response to the Mayor's query, Mr. Marx explained that the Board of
Supervisors, on the recommendation of the County Council, was to implement the
hazardous waste surveillance program countywide without specific approval by
the various cities in the County. There is a program to inspect any hazardous
waste generator site on an annual basis.
City Engineer Lippitt stated the next portion of the program is to discuss the
closed Class I sites at the Otay Landfill.
Sharon Reid with the Department of Public works testified they are the agency
charged with the responsibility for providing safe disposal for both hazardous
and municipal solid waste. In that capacity, they run the Otay landfill.
They are also responsible under the Class I permit to the Regional Water
Quality Control Board and have specific requirements that cause them to
monitor quarterly. Those monitoring samples taken by the County are sent to
a private lab for examination and comment and then filed with the Regional
Water Quality Control Board. As to the Omar facility, there were some
concerns about air pollution on the closed Class I area. As a result, the Air
Pollution Control District was contacted to set up a monitoring over the
Class I area. The initial tests have been taken; they will be joined with
tests scheduled to begin next week around adjacent areas at the landfill. In
order to give some kind of comparison, they will be taking tests at other
points in Chula Vista.
Mrs. Reid then explained the difference in class designations, clay
composition, and "trash."
COUNTY OF SAN DIEG
DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS
BUILDING 2 5555 OVERLAND AVENUE
R, J. MASSMAN, Director SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92123
Offices of: TELEPHONE: (619) 565-5177
--'lunty Engineer
nty Road Commissioner
~unty Surveyor
County Airports
E,ood co,t,o, October 28, 1983
Liquid WasTe
Mr. John P. Lippitt ~o
City Engineer
City of Chula Vista ~
276 Fourth Avenue ~
Chula Vista, CA 92010 ~
Dear John:
Thank you for the copy of the September 24, 1983 Hazardous Waste Conference
minutes.
While the minutes accurately record the majority of the inputs received
from various participants, I would like to correct one portion of the
comments attributed to me.
On page 9, the minutes should be corrected as follows:
"Mrs. Reid remarked that the same ~ requirements of testing...
"Omar is a privately operated facility. ~ (I do not know who does
the monitoring for the privately owned, closed Omar Class I facility.)
Thank you for the opportunity to discuss hazardous waste matters with
you, your staff and the City Council. Information sharing helps all
of us in responding to the concerns of interested
citizen .
Since~' ly,
Nanage~
SOR: k~w
Council Conference _ 9 September 29, 1983
Mrs. Reid remarked that the same~s~-{~ of testing apply to Omar as to the
Otay landfill sites.
Omar is a privately operated facility. ~xz~.}~zf~j~ does the monitoring and
performs the testing. It is sent to a lab under contract with the Department
with the results going to Regional Water Quality Control.
Otay contracts with an independent source for their monitoring. There are six
different layers of clay for permeability. Mrs. Reid commented by luck of the
geology, the site is underlain by many feet of clay ideal for containment.
5. AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT (A.P.C.D.)
The District has started some preliminary monitoring at Otay site. The
District's responsibility was to set up a control for monitoring all
closed a.d active landfills in San Diego Co..ty.to rai. perso..e
t
and buy equipment. Monday, they will start sampling in residential areas
close to and nearby the Otay landfill and will do some ambient sampling on top
of the landfill. Two weeks ago they had staff come down from E1 Monte from
the California Resources Laboratories and did some sampling in the test
methane gas wells at Otay.
Mr. Lake of the Air Pollution Control District stated they had required BKK to
obtain permits from their district in order to operate the new transfer
facility in Otay. The Air Pollution Control District, whenever it evaluates
any site makes findings as to whether or not the site is in compliance with
all applicable regulations. In the case of the BKK transfer station there are
three primary areas that would have to be looked at: 1. The potential for
emissions of volatile or organic compounds from the handling of both the acid
1
and caustic wastes. (A so, the handling of any paint sludges or solvent
wastes that may be received or stored on site.) 2. Potential for acid
droplet or particulate emissions from the transfer of acid or caustic waste or
the neutralization process that would occur on site. 3. potential for odors
or nuisance complaints associated with the operation of the equipment. At
this point in time, they are in the process of evaluating the site and have
conducted some preliminary inspections and preliminary testing. They have
scheduled for a source test of the acid fumes cover which the site has for
controlling acid, droplet emissions and particulate emissions and are
reviewing a proposed analytical method that BKK will employ to determine the
presence of any organic compounds in neutralized waste which they would be
putting through their process equipment to remove water and subsequently to
the evaporation pond. They are in the process of having a source test run on
the scrubber that is used to control the acid emissions and expect that
testing to be completed within two to three weeks.
6. GENERAL QUESTION AND ANSWER SESSION
In answer to Councilwoman McCandliss' question, Mr. McAuley explained the
decision not to require an environmental impact report on BKK was made by the
County of San Diego. All members of the Council reviewed the findings, the
study and declaration and those documents were the basis of the County's
position.
10
Council Conference - September 29, 1983
Councilman Moore remarked the Red Cross prepares for disaster and emergencies
by prearranged agreement so they can obtain hospital, first aid equipment from
appropriate sources by showing proper identification. He asked if it would be
amenable to have them respond to disaster or emergency or hazardous waste
spill within our City.
Mr. McAuley answered in the affirmative.
In answer to the Council's queries, Mrs. Reid stated the County would
participate in a drill; if an incident occurred on BKK landfill, County
response plan would be to call on the radio station which is faster than its
own fire department/police department, and County people would be on the
spill. IT Corporation contract would also be called.
Due to the lateness of the hour the Mayor indicated he would not entertain any
public questions or comments but asked the participants to make themselves
available to public comments.
MSUC (Cox/McCandliss) to
a) direct staff to consider the implementation of some type of disaster
drills as they relate to the handling of hazardous wastes and in
developing such a drill that every effort be made not only to involve the
public sector but the private sector - the purveyors of industrial waste,
to develop some type of a comprehensive program that can be on a regular
type basis.
b. An assessment of resources available in the event of an industrial type
accident or spillage - resources available in the City's sphere of
influence and also in the private sector.
c. Staff to do a needs assessment of what type of fire safety equipment.
The City doesn't have and to give consideration to acquiring this
equipment over a period of time to better prepare the City to respond in
the event there are any industrial types of spillage,
d. Direct staff to make contact with the County and the appropriate State
agencies requesting their cooperation and making sure the City gets
copies of any type of monitoring, evaluation (not background information
b
as staff may not be able to evaluate it) ut there should be someone on
staff that is a contact for the various State, County and Federal
agencies if that is appropriate that can receive copies of evaluations
and monitoring that
is going on.
MSUC (Malcolm/Moore) to send a letter of thanks to BKK for their time and
effort shown to the community for opening up their facility and having people
stay overtime so the public could be made aware of what happens there.
Council Conference -11 - September 29, 1983
7. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT
a. MSUC (Malcolm/Cox) to meet for Closed Session for meet and confer and
personnel matters.
b. Annual Campaign for United Way Chad - City Employees last year
contributed $7,500; this year contributed $13,000. City Manager Goss
stated the employees should be commended for their participation and the
increase.
8. MAYOR'S REPORT (None)
9. COUNCIL COMMENTS
a. Councilwoman McCandliss commented on the report regarding the filed
hazardous waste disposal facility in the Montgomery area. On page 2 it
states: "if Council wishes staff will prepare a letter" She said Council
has already directed a letter be prepared and sent. City Manager Goss
said it came back in this form to provide response to request for
information. The letter will be sent at Council's direction.
The Council recessed to a Closed Session at 6:30 p.m.
The Deputy City Clerk was excused and the City Manager reported the Closed
Session ended at 7:00 p.m.
Adjournment at 7:00 p.m. to a workshop scheduled for September 30 (Assessment
Center for City Attorney applicants) and to the meeting scheduled for Tuesday,
October ll, 1983 at 7:00 p.m.
JENNIE M. FULASZ
City Clerk, CMC
PATRICIA A. GUARDACOSTA
Deputy City Clerk
WPG:0351C
PAG