HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 1991/03/19
Tuesday, March 19, 1991
6:00 p.m.
'. .
t1j ........"","',.., \
Gr~'.':C"~'.~ t~;; '::1" ;-:'::-:'1:':::/ or ~.b;':n:::.' tb'1~ I om
<..;. ;u:] \I:.J:;"1 [n '2:~3
".J~ , ,~ '.. ,~.. ,'l'~ ".' ,~. .~ I
~':)'Ji~ "sr.;~;:. ~::::, [L:!!~:~~ ~~{~:~-.~~
L.. ~::,.?'. ~t!\I.__ SIC:: ;:b"t.. y~'iP'c on Council Chambers
~ - \lublic Services Building
Resrular Meetinsr of the City of Chula Vista City Council
CALLED TO ORDER
1.
CAlL TIffi ROIl.:
Councilmembers Malcolm _, Nader _, Rindone _ and Mayor Pro
Tempore Moore _'
2. PLEDGE OF AllEGIANCE TO TIffi FlAG. SILENT PRAYER
3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: February 4, 1991, and March 12, 1991
4. SPECIAL ORDERS OF TIffi DAY:
a. Presentation by San Diego County Water Authority regarding water crisis and implication
of 50% water cutbacks - Michael Madigan, Chairman.
b. Presentation of certificates to the Chula Vista's Odawara Marathon Relay Team, their coach
and facilitator.
c. Presentation by Lisa Campbell and participants from the Odawara City Ten Year Anniversary
Relay Race . The race took place in Odawara, Kanagawa, Japan in February 1991.
CONSENT CALENDAR
The staff recommendations regarding the following items listed under the Consent Calendar will be enacted by the
Council by one motion without discussion unless a Counci1member, a member of the public or City staff requests
that the item be pulled for discussion. If you wish to speak on one of these items, please fill out a "Request to
Speak Form" available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. (Complete the green form
to speak in favor of the staff recommendation; complete the pink form to speak in opposition to the staff
recommendation.) Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be discussed after Public Hearings and Oral
Communications. Items pulled by the public will be the first items of business.
5. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS:
a. Request for Council to grant an emergency ordinance for a right of use permit for a project
that will help lessen the water problem in the South Bay area - Roy Muraoka, Chief
Executive Officer, Muraoka Enterprises, Incorporated, 1425 Second Avenue, Chula Vista, CA
92011.
b. Claim against the City. George Merziotis, C/O Torrey Pines Property Management, Inc., 713
Broadway, Suite" J", Chula Vista, CA 91910
c. Letter requesting permission to appear before Council regarding Truman Brooks v Margie
J. Phares litigation. Truman Brooks, 3404-A Bonita Road, Chula Vista, CA 92010
AGENDA
-2-
March 19, 1991
6. RESOLUTION 16093 APPROVING AGREEMENT BETWEEN 1HE orr OF CHULA VISTA AND
KEYSER MARSTON ASSOOATES, INCORPORATED FOR ECONOMIC
ANALYSIS OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS AND APPROPRIATING
FUNDS 1HEREFOR - The City of Chula Vista is interested in receiving
economic analyses relating ta the value of entering into development
agreements for various large scale private projects. Staff recommends
approval of the resolution. (Deputy City Manager Krempl) 4/5'. vote
required. Continued from the 3/12/91 meeting.
7. RESOLUTION 16095 AUTHORIZING UTIGATION AGAINST 1HE COUNlY OF SAN DIEGO TO
CHAllENGE THEIR NEWLY IMPOSED BOOKING FEE - It is recommended
that a resolution be adopted authorizing the City Attorney and the City
Manager to join with other concerned cities in selecting special counsel to
challenge the San Diego County booking fee and appropriating funds not
to exceed $10,000. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (City
Attorney)
8. RESOLUTION 16096 APPROVING 1HE GREG ROGERS PARK MASTER PLAN AND ADOPTING
1HE NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR IS-90-51 - Since July, 1989, the
department has been working with the architectural firm of
Gillespie/Delorenzo to design a Master Plan far Greg Rogers Park. Staff
recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Parks and Recreation)
9. RESOLUTION 16097 APPROVING FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN 1HE orr
OF CHULA VISTA AND cOMMUNlrr TRANSIT SERVICES,
INCORPORATED FOR HANDYTRANS OPERATION. The current three year
agreement between the City and Community Transit Services, Inc. (CTS)
for Handyttans operations terminates on 6/30/91, and includes an option
to extend the agreement on an annual basis for two years. This first
amendment extends the agreement for one year. Staff recommends
approval of the resolution. (Director of Public Works)
10. RESOLUTION 16098 ESTABUSHING AN AlJ...-WAY STOP AT 1HE INrERSECTION OF CORRAL
CANYON ROAD AND COUNTRY VISTAS LANE . Staff has evaluated the
request for an all.way stop at the intersection of Corral Canyon Road and
Country Vistas Lane. Staff recommends approval of the resolution.
(Director of Public Works)
ll.A. REPORT REGARDING CLOSING OR REDUONG 1HE PUBUC SERVICE HOURS AT
1HE UBRARY AT 365 "f" STREET IN ORDER TO RELABEL 1HE
COIJ.ECTION WITH BAR CODE IDENTIFICATION LABELS PRIOR TO
GOING ONIJNE WITH 1HE INLEX UBRARY AUTOMATION SYSTEM - Two
alternate resolutions are outlined for Council consideration. (Library
Director)
AGENDA
.3.
March 19, 1991
B. RESOLUTION 16099A APPROVING 11iE IJBRARY AT 365 "F" STREET BE CLOSED DURING
MORNING HOURS, 10:00 AM. TO 12:00 NOON, FOR THREE WEEKS
BEGINNING APRIL 1 THROUGH APRIL 19, 1991, IN ORDER TO BAR
CODE 11iE COLLECTION
C. RESOLUTION 16099B APPROVING 11iE IJBRARY AT 365 "F" STREET BE CLOSED FOR EIGHT
DAYS, (APRIL 1 THROUGH 8, 1991) IN ORDER TO BAR CODE 11iE
COLLECTION
12. REPORT ON CHULA VISTA TRANSIT (CVf) STUDY. At it's meeting on 3/5/91,
Council considered proposed CVT service changes for next fiscal year, and
directed staff to reevaluate two proposed changes which are: (1)
elimination of Route 702 service to "F" Street between Second and Fourth
Avenues, and (2) the elimination of Route 701 service on
Palomar/Second/Quintard. Staff recommends that Council accept the
report and recommend to the SCOOT Board that Phase I CVT
improvements be implemented in FY 1991.92, subject to any changes
Council may approve. (Director of Public Works)
* * END OF CONSENT CALENDAR * *
PUBIJC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. If you wish to speak
to any item, please fill out the "Request to Speak Form" available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior
to the meeting. (Complete the green form to speak in favor of the staff recommendation; complete the pink form
to speak in opposition to the staff recommendation.) Comments are limited to five minutes per individual
13.
PUBIJC HEARING
FOR CONSIDERATION OF COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT NUMBER 52,
CONSTRUCTION OF A 245,000 SQUARE FOOT INDUSTRIAL BUSINESS
PARK BWLDING OWNED BY ROHR INDUSTRIES, INCORPORATED .
Consideration of a 245,000 square foot business park building on 11 acres
of property located at 850 Lagoon Drive, owned by Rohr Industries.
(Director of Community Development) . The public hearing was continued
to the meeting of 3/26/91. Municipal Code Section 2.04.020, requires that
the City Council meeting the week prior to Easter be canceled, therefore
staff recommends Council continue the public hearing to the meeting of
4/2/91.
14.
PUBIJC HEARING
ADJUSTMENT OF GOLF COURSE GREEN FEES . American Golf has
requested a green fee adjustment for the Chula Vista Golf Course as
provided in the lease agreement with the City. The effective date of
increase, if approved, would be 5/1/91. Staff recommends approval ofthe
resolution. (Director of Parks and Recreation)
RESOLUTION 16100 APPROVING 11iE GREEN FEE ADJUSTMENT FOR CHULA VISTA
MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE
AGENDA
15.
ORDINANCE 2447
A.
PUBUC HEARING
ORDINANCE 2448
B.
PUBUC HEARING
-4-
March 19, 1991
ESfABUSHING TIffi GROWlHMANAGEMENr OVERSIGHf COMMISSION
(first readin~) - The ordinance does not require a public hearing but is
related to the following items. Staff recommends Council continue the
item to the 4/2/91 meeting. (City Attorney)
PCA-91-3: CONSIDERATION OF AN AMENDMENT TO TIffi MUNICIPAL
CODE RElATING TO ADOPTION OF TIffi GROWIH MANAGEMENr
IMPLEMENTATION ORDINANCE - The Growth Management Program and
implementing ordinances will create a comprehensive system to manage
future growth by directing and phasing development in order to guarantee
the timely provision of public facilities and services. The ordinance to
establish the Growth Management Oversight Commission will replace the
original resolution adopted by Council in 1987. Staff recommends that
Council continue the public hearing to the 4/2/91 meeting. (Director of
Planning)
RElATING TO ADOPTION OF TIffi GROWIH MANAGEMENT ORDINANCE
(first readin~)
PCM-91-5: CONSIDERATION OF ADOPTING TIffi GROWIH
MANAGEMENr PROGRAM - Staff recommends that Council continue the
public hearing to the 4/2/91 meeting. (Director of Planning)
RESOLUTION 16101 ADOPTING TIffi GROWIH MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
OTHER BUSINESS
16. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - this is an opportunity for the general publil: to address the City Cowu:il on
any subject matter within the Cowu:il's jurisdiction that is not an item on this agenda. (State law,
however, generally prohibits the City Council from taking action on any issues not included on the posted
agenda.) If you wish to address the Council on such a subject, please complete the yellow "Request to
Speak Under Oral Communications Form" available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to
the meeting. Those who wish to speak, please give your name and address for record purposes and follow
up action. Your time is limited to three minutes per speaker.
17. BOARD AND COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS: None
18. ITEMS PULLED FROM TIffi CONSENT CALENDAR - this is the time the City Council will discuss items
which have been removed from the Consent Calendar. Agenda items pulled at the request of the public
will be considered prior to those pulled by Councilmembers. Public comments are limited to five minutes
per individual.
19. CIlY MANAGER'S REPORTfS)
a. Scheduling of meetings.
,-
AGENDA
-5-
March 19, 1991
20. MAYOR'S REPORT(S)
Welcome home signs and activities for Desert Storm participants to include parade, potential events
at Southwester College - Devore Stadium followed by evening dance on the Fourth of July.
21. COUNCIL COMMENTS
a. Councilman Malcolm:
1. Opposition to Route 125 Toll Road - Continued from the 3/12191 meeting_
2. Legislative Analysis:
Information: Support of proposal by George F. Bailey, Supervisor 2nd District, San
Diego County Board of Supervisors regarding drunk driving charges.
b. Councilman Rindone:
Bayfront Task Force Subcommittee Report - Continued from the 3/12191 meeting.
c. Councilman Nader:
South Bay cities request a meeting with their respective Port Commissioners regarding the
bi-national airport plans.
ADJOURNMENT
The City Council will meet in a closed session immediately following the Council meeting to discuss:
Pending litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 - Arciniaga versus the City of
Chula Vista
Pending litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 - Miller versus the City of Chula
Vista
This meeting will adjourn (closed session and thence to) the Regular City Council Meeting on April 2, 1991
at 4:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers.
March 15, 1991
TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: E. R. Asmus, Assistant City Manager ~
SUBJECT:
City Council Meeting of March 19, 1991
Transmitted herewith are the agenda and related materials for the regular City
Council meeting scheduled for March 19, 1991. Comments regarding the Written
Communications are as follows:
Sa. This is a request from Muraoka Enterprise, Inc. that the City consider
some expediting process whereby an underground water well owned by the
writer could be used as quickly as possible to generate some 100,000
gallons of water per day. In view of the water crisis we face, IT IS
RECOMMENDED THAT THE URGENCY ORDINANCE PROCESS AS OUTLINED IN THE
ATTACHED lETTER FROM THE PLANNING DEPARTMENT BE AUTHORIZED AND STAFF BE
DIRECTED TO PREPARE SAID ORDINANCE FOR COUNCIL CONSIDERATION AT YOUR
APRIL 2, 1991 MEETING.
5b. This is a claim for $325,000 filed by Mr. George Merziotis for damages
allegedly incurred for the period May 1989 to December 1990 due to a
sewer pump station denial for his subdivision. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT
THE PORTION OF THE CLAIM AND DAMAGES ACCRUED PRIOR TO ONE YEAR BEFORE
THE DATE OF FILING OF THE CLAIM (FEBRUARY 11, 1990) BE RETURNED AS LATE,
AND THE BALANCE OF THE CLAIM BE DENIED.
5c. This is a letter from Truman Brooks Realtors requesting an opportunity to
appear before the Council in open session to discuss the Brooks versus
Marjie J. Phares et al lawsuit. The correspondence appears to be
promulgated by collection efforts of the City Attorney's Office in
scheduling a debtor's exam. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THE COUNCIL LISTEN
TO THE COMMENTS OF THE SPEAKER, BUT NOT COMMENT IN RESPONSE TO MR.
BROOKS' STATEMENTS. IF THE COUNCIL WISHES TO DISCUSS OR COMMENT ON THE
WRITTEN SETTLEMENT OFFER OR COMMENT ON STATEMENTS OF THE SPEAKER, THEY
SHOULD NOT DO SO IN OPEN SESSION WITHOUT A CLOSED SESSION DISCUSSION OF
THIS MATTER FIRST WITH THE CITY ATTORNEY. IN THE ABSENCE OF OTHER
INSTRUCTIONS OR DIRECTION TO THE CONTRARY, THE CITY ATTORNEY INTENDS TO
PROCEED TO COLLECT ON THE COST ORDER, AND WILL CONFIRM REJECTION OF THE
PROPOSED WRITTEN SETTLEMENT OFFER.
ERA:mab
trans
March 15, 1991
TO:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
Sid Morris, Deputy City Manag~
Legislative Analysis
At its March 12, 1991 meeting, Council requested staff to review the attached
proposal from Supervisor Bailey to charge drunk drivers for their booking and
processing costs. County staff was contacted for more specifics relating to this
proposa 1. The propos a 1 is current ly being formu lated by Supervi sor Ba iley' s
office and there is no bill number or specific language available.
The proposa 1 appears to be cons i stent with Counc i l' s adopted legi slat ive program,
Section B(I)a, Fiscal Support - Home Rule. On this basis, it is recommended that
the City Council endorse the proposal in concept and monitor for final language.
Further, it is recommended that staff be authorized to prepare a letter for the
Mayor's signature conveying the City's position to Supervisor Bailey's proposal.
Staff will bring forth a full analysis at the appropriate time.
The recommendation is consistent with the Legislative program and reauires no
Council action. The Police Department concurs with staff's recommendations. If
you have any questions, please contact me or Iracsema Quilantan at 5031.
IOQ/ak
d1ee,
~Ia.l.. -I
,y ~KU Ur ~U~KVK~ I~L NO.bl~-~~(-4U~~
4
Mar ~,~l ~:U( No.OOl P.02
ATTACHMENT #4
March 7, 1991
(
"'F1^
Dear ^F2^:
On February 26, 1991, at my request tile Board of Supervisors took action 10 direct the Chief Admlnistratl\le
Officer to Investigate charging drunk drivers for their booking and processing costs as an Immediate, upfront
charge. This action was taken 10 place Ihe responsibility for paying wIth Ihose responsible for the costs
Incurred. .
On this same dale. the Board took action to adopt an Ordinance 10 establish a $154 booking and processing
fee to be collected quarterly commencing with the fourth quarter of the current Fiscal Year. WhUe I realize
Ihe problems the cllies In the Second Supervisorial District have with this aCllon, I also realize the
expectation of the legislature 10 enact these fees.
I, IIso. Wlnt 10 sllare with you the f1nancla1llardshlp this action will have on cIlI... In my opinion, we cannot
continue 10 solve the revenue shortfall In Ihe Slate budget by expecting local government 10 somehow find
the money. We limply don't have Itl Restructuring lhe Slate budget, letting prlorllles, relieving local
governments of State mandates and CUlling expenditures must occur thls year. We need real solutions for
the long term and I wll assist you In anyway I can 10 reach this goal.
In Ihe meantime, any assistance you could provide to require the courts, In addition to normal fines, 10
charge drunk drivers for their booking and processing costs would be greatly appreciated and would relieve
taxpayers 01 these unneccesssry costs.
Thank you for your immediate atlentlon to this matler.
Slnc.rely,
George F. BaDey
Supervisor. Second District
San Diego County Board or Supervisors
GFB:dJ
cc:
Office of League 01 Call1ornla Cllles .1400 K Street, Sacramento. CA 95814
CSAC. 1100 K Srreel, Sulle 101, Sacramenlo, CA 95814
MADD . 510 N. E5Condldo Bouleverd, Suite 28, E5Condlclo, CA 92025
C"
0\ la1-~
AGENDA ITEM.. ~ \-1
.
March 8, 1991
File # HY-029
LY-020
FROM:
City Council
John Goss, City Manager Jf;~
John Lippitt, Director of Public
TO:
VIA:
SUBJECT:
SR 125 Toll Road
wor~
The purpose of this memorandum is to provide the City Council
with information on the status of the Route 125 toll road
proposal. There are many actions taking place relative to the
toll road that we believe the city Council should consider in its
deliberation on the question of support or opposition to the toll
road.
.
It is a well known fact that a road in the general alignment of
the proposed State Route 125 is required. The proposed Growth
Management Plan and TPP will suggest that no new development be
approved until a financing plan is in place for at least an
interim route within that corridor. We believe that this is
needed even if a franchise is awarded by Caltrans to California
Transportation Ventures (CTV) because CTV could back out any time
up to start of construction. If that happened, we would be left
without an adequate roadway system in the eastern area.
We are developing a scope of work for a consulting team to help
us deal with the financing issue but also to guide us in dealing
with the toll road issue. Staff believes the toll road
consultants should include engineering, legal and financial
expertise. The legal expertise is needed to analyze the law and
see if the franchise is legal, especially from an environmental
standpoint. For instance, there is a provision that 1-905 cannot
be built beyond a certain capacity without the consent of CTV.
This is to avoid a parallel route problem that could impact the
toll road. CTV has been advised that Chula Vista, although not
yet taking a formal action, is concerned with the prospect of
Chula vista residents paying tolls. We have been discussing ways
of addressing that issue with them. They are also concerned
.
.
City Council
-2-
March 8, 1991
about financing of the route and have made proposals that our
developers fund a portion of the route. Developers fees, and/or
Mello Roos type financing could be set up to pay our share of the
project, but in doing so, we believe Chula vista residents should
be allowed to ride free or certainly at a reduced toll. The
City's share, however, could cost as much as the total existing
DIF for streets. CTV has not accepted the reduced toll concept,
but are willing to discuss it further. The question we must
consider is "Does Chula vista want to be an equity partner?" In
one sense, an equity partner has a great deal lose, but we have
even more to lose if the road is not built at all.
.
CTV is trying to get developers to front some money for the
environmental work required. The developers are hesitant to do
this unless they get credit for development under our DIF
program. The City holds the power in this process because if we
say no, CTV may have a very difficult time in finding money for
the environmental studies. Their point is that if the toll road
is built, or a standard freeway is pursued, an EIR is still
needed. If we allow what they want, the EIR would be structured
to allow either option. Caltrans has advised us that there is no
financing available for a non-toll facility. If the toll road is
not built, a freeway through this corridor, if not built by the
City probably is at least 10 years off.
One of the big questions facing the city is equity. The proposed
development on Otay Mesa, is impacting the need for the Route 125
more than simply the need created by growth in our eastern
territories. The city of San Diego and the County of San Diego
have not taken a position on the toll road issue, nor have they
addressed the issue of how Route 125 will be financed since
neither agency has implemented or proposed developer fees for
development on the Mesa. A toll road provides the mechanism of
bringing some measure of equity, so long as Chula vista residents
do not have to pay a full toll. The otay Mesa businesses and
traffic would pay the full toll and, therefore, support the
construction of the road.
There are at least two legislative items that have been
introduced relating to State Route 125. First, Assembly Bill
1125 as introduced by Assembly Member Peace adds a requirement to
the Streets and Highways Code that would prohibit construction
from beginning for a demonstration highway in San Diego County
until the State Air Resources Board has determined that
construction of the highway would result in improved air quality
in the San Diego air basin.
.
.
.
.
City Council
-3-
March 8, 1991
A second bill, Assembly Bill 913 as introduced by Assembly Member
Hunter, would prohibit the commencement of construction of a
segment of state Highway 125 unless the final route alignment and
preliminary environmental impact report for that segment is
completed by January 1992. This would appear to apply, not only
to a toll road but to any freeway as well. This bill would not
only kill the toll road, but would also appear to prohibit the
construction of any part of Route 125 as a non-toll facility.
California Transportation Ventures has also indicated that the
EIR process is at least a two-year process and would not be
completed until approximately January 1993.
A recent newspaper article indicating that there would be no
exits on Route 125 within Chula vista is not correct. The
preliminary report prepared and submitted by CTV provides several
exits within Chula vista. In addition, at a recent meeting when
asked about the newspaper comment, the CTV staff said they are
still pursuing those exits and that they are required if the toll
road is to be financially feasible.
staff believes there are numerous areas where more work is needed
on the toll facility issue. We, therefore, think the City
Council may wish to consider returning the entire matter back to
staff for further study before taking a definitive position one
way or the other.
CLS:nm/kw
Attachments - AB913
AB1125
(CLS1\SR125.DOC.1)
. 9 ~
,
.
.
~
'-
.,-
--)-
c:.wFOlOOA Ll!:CJSLA~I"'IlECUl.AB SBSSION
.' ..
. .
ASSEMBLY BILL
No. 913
. :.. :
, .
. " ."
Introduced J)Y.~~~~~)")lembe,r HUDt~r
. .
.
. .. \
Feb.~~~.~~l
.. . ~'" ,
..
. "
An act to add Seetioll 4231 to .:the . Streets and Highways
Code, relating to ~hway$:.... ... . :';.' . .' . .
, ,
1.ECISLATlVE Q(>lJNSEL'S DIGEST
AB 913, as introduced,:,a;~te~. ".:' Highways: State Hiahw8y
Route 125. '.' . " .'. .
Under existing law, the' .Department of Transportation is
generally responsible the.... c>>n.tructing state highways
between statutorily preicrlbe.dten:nini. .
, This bill would prohibit the C>>~encement of construction
on a segment of State ,Highw.ay. .Roi,lte 185 unless, by January
1. 1992, the final route. IIelec~on and preliminary
environmental. impact ,r~~r~ for that ~iment. were
completed. ,. :.. .
Vote: majority. A'ppJ;'Opriati9~: DO; Fiscal committee: yes.
State-mandated l~ pr,osx:am:. .:~t?~ ' . '
. ' ,
The people of the "t~..fi! ~riJJ, do enact as (g1Jows:
. . , ".1, ......
1 SECTION 1. Section 4215..1 J.i added to the Streets and
2 Highways Code, to ~'.:. ' '
3 425.1. ConstructioD Ihall Dot commence on the
" .egment oE Route '1~ : d~bed in lubdivision <a) of
e Section 425 if the flna1' t~~.. election ~d prelinUnary
e enVironmental QIlpa,et ~r,~ tor that segment were not
1 completed on or ~re.1an~ 1~ 1992.
... '. .' .
,. "
, '.,
" .'
, <:Q':, ....:.
, . " ..;.' " .
, ., -- ~: " .
Z'd
.' '. .J.... . 10
~~a" 6SC! 619 .00 loIIMCn:IB 0S:H 16. 90 -.,
PAGE 1
Display 1991-1992 Bill Text - INFORMATION
BILL NUMBER: AB 1125
.
BILL TEXT
INTRODUCED BY Assembly Kember Peace
KARCH 5, 1991
An act to add Section 144 to the Streets and Highways Code, relating to
highways.
LEGISLATIvE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
AB 1125, as introduced, Peace. State transportation facilities: private
~nstruction: air quality.
,., Existing law authorizes the Department of Transportation to enter into
agreements with private entities for the construction of 4 transportation
demonstration projects. The private entity would be allowed to operate the
facility for up to 35 years under a lease from the department and to charge
tolls for use of the facility. The facility would revert to the state at the
end of that period.
This bill would prohibit construction from beginning on a proposed state
highway in San Diego County pursuant to those provisions until the State Air
Resources Board has determined that construction of the highway would result
in improved air quality in the San Diego Air Basin.
Vote: majority. Appropriation: no. Fiscal committee: yes.
State-mandated local program: no.
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA DO ENACT AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1. Section 144 is added to the Streets and Highways Code, to read:
144. Construction shall not begin, pursuant to Section 143, on proposed
State Highway Route 125 in San Diego County, until the State Air Resources
Board has determined that construction of the highway would result in improved
air quality in the San Diego Air Basin.
.
3211 Fifth Avenue. San Diego, California 92103-5718
(619) 297-3218 FAX (619) 297-0511
D ~ @ ~ 0 W -"[~lr"\ .
I pI]:'
! MAR -1199\ lL:JI
l CITY COUNCIL OffiCES j \
C~UtA VISTA, CA __'
@
San Diego County Water Author
A Public Agency
March 5,1991
The Honorable Leonard Moore
Mayor Pro Tern
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 92010
Dear Len:
The San Diego County Water Authority appreciates the opportunity to meet with
your council on Tuesday, March 19 at 6 p.m. The purpose of this forum would be
to continue our dialogue regarding the current water situation and to exchange
ideas regarding additional measures your city can take to help us meet potential
50 percent water cutbacks.
One step I would like to request is for your council to pass a resolution, which
supports water conservation. Elements may be added or modified based on your
city's particular situation or demographics. This can be further explored when
we meet.
Other actions your council could take to assist the Authority are to :
. Reduce the city's water usage by at least the percentage in affect for
all other users;
. Communicate regularly and effectively with citizens to encourage water
conservation;
. Review planning standards and CC&Rs in your city to determine if they
can be revised to temporarily reduce water consumption, particularly
requirements for green turf and landscaping of new PUDs or commercial
sites, for example;
. Generate community activities and news to gain media coverage of
the water situation in your community.
. Have water saving tips and other conservation information
available at city hall.
To survive this summer's water conditions will require drastic action. Your
guidance, aggressive participation and the cooperation of every city in the
county, are valuable contributions to our efforts.
MEMBER AGENCIES
CITlES
. DelMar' E,;condidoo NOlional City
. O"eon,id... Powoy. Son Diego
IRRIGATION DISTRICTS
. Sonia Fe 0 Soutl1 Boy
COUNTY WATER DISTRICT
.Volleeito.
MUNICIPAL WATER DISTRICTS
. BuenoColorodo . Rainbow
. Carl.bod . Romona
.Olivenhoin . Rincon del Diablo
. Padre Dam . VolleyCente,
. Yuima
COUNTY
. Son Diego
(ex offi~io)
~ PUBLIC UTILITY DISTRICT
o Follbrook
WATER DISTRICTS
. Helix' Olay FEDERAL AGENCY
. Son Dieguito a...... Pendleton Military Re.ervation
PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
The Honorable Leonard Moore
March 5, 1991
Page 2
Thank you very much for your consideration of, and assistance with, this
important matter.
Sincerely,
/LA. ~-
Michael Madigan
. Chairman
va.. 2..
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item~
Meeting Date 3/19/91
ITEM TITLE: CERTIFICATES OF APPRECIATION PRESENTATION
SUBMITTED BY: MAYOR PRO TEMPORE MOo~14/SthS Vote: Yes_ NcKX)
Mayor pro Tempore will present Certificates of Appreciation to the
members of the Chu1a vista team for the 10th Annual Odawara Relay
Race held in February 1991:
Neal Rogers
Willie Wilson
Kasey Kasem
Nathan Simmons
Rudy Ricco
Ruben Arechigo1
Colin Sokol are
Lisa Campbell, Trainer
Frank Fujakawi, Facilitator
'Ib -I
MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING
INTERNATIONAL FRIENDSHIP COMMISSION
CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
February 25, 1991
4:00 P.M.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Chairman Thomas, Members Brining, Hammock,
Harmata, Martin, Rittenhouse, and Taboada.
Also present were Doris Cox and two students
from Chula Vista High School, Yvette Revalca-
ba and Norma Gilbert.
Chairman Thomas welcomed Nancy Taboada to the
membership, she is the newest member to the
IFC.
MEMBERS ABSENT:
Decker, (excused) & Backer (excused)
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
MSUC (Brining/Hammock) to approve the
minutes of January 28, 1991, as submit-
ted.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
A. Odawara Student Exchange - A letter was received from Japan
and they have canceled the plans for the 20 students they
wanted to send due to the war.
B. Chula Vista/Irapauto Sister Cities
1 .
Chapter Meeting - The February 17, 1991
ing was held at Nancy Taboata's house.
very good and the business went well.
Chapter Meet-
The food was
At this meeting a resolution was adopted by the
Chapter and Chairman Thomas read it and asked the
IFC to accept the resolution. (see attached)
MSUC (Hammock/Taboata) To accept the Resolution as
read by Chairman Thomas.
C. Odawara Relay Race: John Rittenhouse gave a report on the
boys that went to Odawara for the race. All the boys had a
good time.
The receipts for Fred Fujikawa were presented to the secre-
tary. The total of the receipts is $1,045.82.
MSUC (Rittenhouse/Taboata) To accept the receipts of Mr.
Fujikawa and to have a check issued to him.
Mr. Fujikawa would like to attend the next meeting to show
the slides he took on the trip and at the race.
~b.~
f--
n
D.
MSlJ8,9~~,,~S,~9P~~"4~~~bJ To Present the Odawara. Ma.x:atp.olt'
Relay f'eamto tlleCity"Councilfor recogniti()n by presenta-
tion of proclamation certificates on March 19,,'~~...,
Odawara Anniversary Celebration Update - The City will be
presenting a memento to the City of Odawara and the IFC
will also be presenting a memento to the City of Odawara.
1
MSUC (Rittenhouse/Martin) To use the funds left over from
the $1500 that was designated for Frank Fujikawa to pur-
chase gifts for Odawara.
E. Kellogg Grant - The Grant has been mailed in. If the Grant
is given to the IFC we will be able to sent 5 students to
Irapuato, Mexico to participate in volunteer activities in
the Irapuato "Face Humana" program and for foster children,
orphans, or abused children, and/or at the Casa De Cultura
De Irapuato.
The students that come to Chula Vista will participate in
volunteer activities in the Chula Vista Park and Recreation
Department regular Summer Day Camp program and Camp Sunrise
The Developmentally Disabled Summer Camp.
MSUC (Rittenhouse/Martin) To approve the submitting of the
Kellogg Grant Proposal.
MSUC ( Brining/Hammock) To Present the plaque received from
the US/Mexico Sister Cities National Conference for out-
standing programs and activities to the City Council and to
introduce the Chula Vista/Irapuato Sister Cities Associa-
tion Board to the City Council on March 12, 1991.
Irapuato Anniversary Celebration - Students and several
adults will be going to Irapuato. The students will leave
March 17, 1991 and return March 31, 1991. They will be
attending part of the Strawberry Festival. This year is
also the 20th anniversary as our Sister City.
MSUC (Rittenhouse/Brining) To spend up to $200 for plaque
to present to Irapuato in memento of our 20 years as
Sister Cities.
NEW BUSINESS
A. Archives - Everyone is to make a list of everything
they have that belongs to the IFC and bring it to the
next meeting.
REPORTS
Treasurers Report: $18.32 in bank.
Frank Fujikawa has expressed an interest in working with
the IFC.
4ba
~
Doris Cox expressed a concern that a meeting with the
students and parents of students that are going to Irapuato
in March be scheduled. A meeting will be scheduled and
students and parents will be notified.
Meeting adjourned at 5:40 P.M.
<<~
Lorraine Alexander,
tI b.'J
.
-
.
-
.
MURAOKA ENTERPRISE INC.
RECEIVED
1425 SECOND AVENUE
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
92011
(619) 422-0272
'91
!tAR -8 P 3 '57
. -
CITY "F "H"" A' ',"q
.. \} V .tict. V iJ ! M
CITY CLERK'S orf'lcr-
HOUSING IS OUR BUSINESS
Chula Vista City Council
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, California 91910
March 8, 1991
To the Members of the Chula Vista City Council,
As the water shortage continues to worsen, the need for alternative sources of water becomes even
more important. Muraoka Enterprise Inc. proposes to put together a project that will help lessen
the water problem in the South Bay area. An outline of the project is included with this letter.
In speaking with Chula Vista's planning staff, it has come to our attention that a property vital to
the projects success cannot be used because of current city zoning. The general plan of the project
is to use the property, located at northeast corner of Second and Orange, as a point for loading
water trucks. The R zoning, according to the planning staff, does not permit such a use. In order to
get this project off the ground in a timely manner, Muraoka Enterprise would like to ask the city
council to grant an emergency ordinance for a right of use permit for this proposed project.
Si1lcerely,
, ;:
I c- ..
.'7tuv<. e-< ~ , "-
Roy ~uraoka
Chief Executive Officer
Muraoka Enterprises Incorporated
~~~~ l"-~)
~~~
~ ft \)110 '\
~!7F' ,;r.;:,:,~;cF";'\"1 ("".0 "'J:l [':Ii
;"''''''}' "'!-'. W' f'.l '1.,' '(.;.,,!, <t;"I.,.-- \ "")"
\J i. -_"" :..j." ;:J .':,;',;.j 'd ~.:::~~ \:;:;".:' ,:..~' "J.. ':,: .7: \:; ;,~;
~~)i~~,
""""~""I!-
~~ t':' "( J: '~~'i>'~'l \~
, 'd ,.~ "~:_.., .-_.. ..; /1':-1;)
Sa. - I
~ ')l \q I;J-\
Proposed project:
Muraoka Enterprises proposes to build a water distribution point where it can sell and distribute
nonpotable water.
General Outline:
Muraoka Enterprise Inc. currently owns and operates a underground well that can produce
approximately 90 gallons of water a minute. This well is then pumped through a 6 inch transit pipe
into a 100,000 gallon storage reservoir. The approximate fill time is about 24 hours. Presently the
the reservoir is located at the south side of Palace Gardens Mobile Home Park for irrigation
purposes and is not being used to its full capacity.
The general plan of the project is to connect another outgoing pipe from the storage reservoir and
run it to the adjacent San Diego Gas and Electric property where water tank trucks can be brought
in and filled. It is important to note that the San Diego Gas and Electric property is adjacent to
Palace Gardens Mobile Home Park and is vital to the success of this project. Any other location
would add time and extensive modifications to this much needed project.
The majority of the water from the project wiIl mainly be distributed to the various contractors and
gardeners so it may be used for soil compaction and irrigation purposes. The water could also be
used for pool maintenance. By providing another source of water for the community, Muraoka
Enterprises hopes that it can alleviate some of the burden placed on local water companies.
The project proposed by Muraoka Enterprises is only a temporary solution to a larger problem.
The project wiIl continue until other sources of water make it uneconomical for Muraoka Enterprise
to operate or until the natural resources get back in balance.
In connection with this project, Muraoka Enterprise has been given the go ahead from Sweetwater
Authority, County Health Department, and San Diego Gas and Electric. The project also received
positive outlook from a representative of McMiIlIin Development.
So.. .. ')..
~
?i
1
.
.
. .
.
-11
I]
,
. .
z r: D.sT-
I
L. .
. ./ L
~ .', ,(~UCE
't ',A.(lACF &f~~^,' I (M~OEN
" ~L' HONe I /Itf7~/t /.t7M
~ ~. ~^,NcX).
13 1.-/ ~
~ L_._.. ~
~ ~
.;:.~.-- ~
co. -1""" -- '-- ._
c.......
;>- Or )l/A y
~
,
'-
PR.O,l E.cT L oc,c,-r;o";
.
. . ~
'0
L. OCA r/ON /YAP
/VO '''C4/ J:" ,.
".1
I
I
5a.-3
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item 6b
Meeting Date 3/19/91
ITEM TITLE:
Claim Against the city
SUBMITTED BY:
Director of Personnel ~
(4/5ths Vote: Yes No~)
City Manager ~
Mr. George Merziotis
c/o Torrey Pines Property Management, Inc.
713 Broadway, suite J
Chula Vista, CA 91910
REVIEWED BY:
Claimant:
On February 11, 1991, a claim for $325,000.00 was filed against the City
of Chula vista by Mr. George Merziotis for damages allegedly incurred for
the period May 1989 to December 1990. The claim alleges Mr. Merziotis
sustained damages in connection with his submittal of a subdivision for
approval because a sewer pump station for his subdivision was denied, but
tentatively approved for another developer.
Because liability on the part of the
recommendation of Risk Management and
processed as follows:
city is extremely remote, it is the
the city Attorney that the claim be
RECOMMENDATION: Return as late that portion
accrued prior to one year before the date of
February 11, 1990, and deny the balance of the
of the claim and damages
filing of the claim; i.e.,
claim.
J
Form A-113 (Rev. 11/79)
Sb-I
uo palHwqns
pa4~ellV :lN3WnJOO lVlN3WNOHI^N3
..ta4l0
lS~l uO~le~~J~loN -----leLd -----a~ueu~p..tO -----uO~lnLOsaH -----luawaa..t6V
SlIBIHX3
TRUMAN BROOkS Rf=AL TORS 3404-A Bond;" Rwd
Re,,1 f=st"te Investments, f=xch"nges, Counseling, Appr"is,,!" M~~VEO- Chul" Vist", C", 9'2010
(619) 4'26-9331
'91 fIR 14 P3 :43
March 14, 1991
CITY Of CHllLA ViSTA
CITY CLERK'S OFFiCE
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RE: Truman Brooks v Margie J. Phares et al
Dear Mayor and City Counci I
I respectfully request an opportunity to appear before the
Counc i I in open sess i on to discuss in deta i I the t rue facts
that surrounded the filing of the above lawsuit, the
negotiations leading up to the acquisition of the site on
Third Avenue and providing you with the facts that wi I I
demonstrate that the lawsuit was valid, that there was no
political motivation, and that there was no intent on my
part to involve the City of Chula Vista in this litigation.
You are aware, I bel ieve, that the decision is on appeal and
I further respectfully request that the Ci ty wi thhold any
and all attempts to affect any payment of this judgement
until the matter is either resolved by the Appellate Court
or an agreement is reached between the City and myself.
On file wi th the Ci ty Attorney is a letter from my attorney
dated March 4, 1991 suggesting terms of a settlement of
which I would be wi I I ing to accept. In return I would be
wi I [i ng to wi thdraw the appea I. It is my sincere wi sh that
the recommended settlement be accepted by the City and put
an end to this matter.
Respectfully yours,
-------_/ /
~v....- /l.1-.",,_A:,-/
'ffuman Btl{Qk's
cc: Michael L. Crowley
Attorney At Law
c it<." ,'Y\f'Jo"'<> 'IN' (!> )
v
c.i-j 1l-\-'h.
~ .J
V~
"-, ....-,'"'
~~ ;;,J
l~y!fJS
Sc-I
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
.
Ite..Jt- (.,
Meeting Date 3,'lC:31-
3/I"lft I
ITEM TITLE: Resolution I~~ Approving Agreement Between the City of
Chula Vista and Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. for Economic
Analysis of Development Agreements and Appropriating Funds
Therefor
SUBMITTED BY: George Krempl, Deputy City Manager\1~
REVIEWED BY: City Manager ~ ~ 4/5ths Vote:YesA--No___
The City of Chula Vista is interested in receiving economic analyses relating to
the value of entering into development agreements for various large scale private
projects.
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt a reso lut ion approving the agreement, attendant work
program with Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. appropriating funds and authorize
the Mayor to sign the agreement on behalf of the City.
. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
BACKGROUND AND DISCUSSION:
The City has four development agreements at present. One is with McMillin for
Rancho Del Rey SPA I and three others are with Eastlake for Eastlake I, Eastlake
Greens and East lake Tra il s. As each deve lopment agreement has evo 1 ved, different
leve 1 s of protection to the deve loper a long with different mixes of public
benefits have evolved. McMillin has indicated an interest in a development
agreement for Ranch del Rey SPA II and III. Baldwin may be interested in a
deve lopment agreement for Sa It Creek Ranch and 1 ikewi se other pending major
projects may des ire one as we 11. The City is interested in economic and
financial assistance to develop a methodology. fiscal model and evaluation to
ascertain the economic benefit of a development agreement to a project applicant
and provide a framework for negotiating the extent of public benefit to be
provided.
To assist us, the City invited submittals of Statement of Qualifications from
firms interested in providing economic services. Four firms responded to the
request: Economic Research Associates, Ralph Anderson and Associates, Alfred
Gobar Associates, Inc. and Keyser Marston Associates. An interview panel was
convened and Keyser Marston was ranked the highest based on a combinati~n of
experience, understanding of the project and ability to perform. The attached
work program and schedule were subsequently developed in a more detailed fashion
~ to accompany the contract.
-4-+--Co -I
The City's objective in proceeding with the consultant study is to develop a
prototype mode 1 that can ass i st us in deve lopment agreement negot iat ions. """'"
Development agreements are one of several alternatives being evaluated to provide
the financial resources needed to construct various public facilities. Once a
model is developed, the value of any developer's financial assistance can then
be assessed against the intrinsic "value" of the agreement. Case studies of
Rancho de 1 Rey, Sa 1 t Creek and other projects far enough along to produce
meaningful data will be analyzed. The study is expected to take about eight
weeks.
FISCAL IMPACT:
The cost of the study will be a maximum of $27,000. Funds are available in the
Supplemental DlF to cover the costs.
(wpslKEYl1ERAll8]
.........
.l::~
"""
-'t-7= ". ~
RESOLUTION NO. /<00 q3
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND KEYSER
MARSTON ASSOCIATES, INC. FOR ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
OF DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS, AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT, AND
APPROPRIATING FUNDS THEREFOR
The City Council of the city of Chula vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the City of Chula vista is interested in
receiving economic analyses relating to the value of entering into
development agreements for various large scale private projects;
and,
WHEREAS, the City invited submittals of Statement of
Qualifications from firms interested in providing economic
services; and,
WHEREAS, four firms responded to the request: Economic
Research Associates, Ralph Anderson and Associates, Alfred Gobar
Associates, Inc. and Keyser Marston Associates; and,
WHEREAS, an interview panel was convened and Keyser
Marston was ranked the highest based on a combination of
experience, understanding of the project and ability to perform.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA DOES HEREBY approve the agreement between the City of Chula
vista and Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. for economic analysis of
development agreements, a copy of which is on file in the office of
the city Clerk.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of
Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said
agreement for and on behalf of the City of Chula vista.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the sum of $27,000 is hereby
appropriated from the Public Facility Development Impact Fee Fund
and transferred to Account No. 801-8010-5201-PF012.
Presented by:
Approved as t
4-At.
Bruce M. Boogaa d
City Attorney
George Krempl, Deputy
City Manager
MarstonA.wp
~ (,-3
.
.
.
AGREEMENT WITH
KEYSER HARSTON ASSOCIATES, INC.
FOR
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FOR DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS
This Agreement is made this March 12, 1991, for the purposes of
reference only, and effective as of the date last executed between the
parties, between the City of Chula Vista ("City") herein, a municipal
corporation of the State of California, and Keyser Marston Associates, Inc., a
professional California development consulting firm ("Consultant"), and is
.ade with reference to the following facts:
BftlIA1S
Whereas, the City of Chula Vista is interested in financial
consultant services to assist in the determination of value associated with
entering into development agreements for major developments; and,
Whereas, Keyser Marston Associates, Inc. has extensive experience
with large master-planned communities and single-family residential
developments and has conducted numerous studies for private developers and
financial institutions throughout California; and,
Whereas, Mr. Heinz A. Schilling, Senior Principal and head of
Consultant's San Diego office, will be Principal-in-Charge and has a strong
background in real estate development in San Diego County and has served as a
financial consultant to many local public agencies; and,
Whereas, Consultant warrants and represents that they are
experienced and staffed in a manner such that they are and can prepare and
deliver the services required of Consultant to City within the time frames
herein provided all in accordance with the terms and conditions of this
Agreement; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City and Consultant do
hereby mutually agree as follows:
1. Consultant's Duties.
a. General Duties.
Consultant shall prepare a model which will allow the City of Chula
Vista to easure in a high-low range the economic benefit of development
agreements which the City may enter into in the future.
Consultant shall analyze two test case examples utiliZing
information from Rancho Del Rey II and III and Salt Creek Ranch.
..,.
-f S' lD-~
b. Scope of Work and Schedule
Consultant shall perfoY'lll the duties and deliver the .Work Product"
as is set forth in the Scope of Work and Schedule, attached hereto as Exhibit
A, not inconsistent with the General Duties, according to, and within the time
fraes therein established (tile being of the essence of this agreement). The
General Duties and the work required in the Scope of Work and Schedule shall
be herein referred to.s the .Defined Services..
c. Standard of Care
Consultant, in perfoY'llling any Services under this agreement, whether
Defined Services or Additional Services, shall be performed in a manner
consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by embers
of the profeSSion currently practicing under similar conditions and in similar
locations.
d. Insurance
Consultant represents that it and its agents, staff and consultants
employed by it are protected by worker's compensation insurance and the
Consultant has the coverage under public liability and property damage
insurance policies which thisl Agreement requires to be demonstrated in the
foY'lll of a certificate of insurance.
Consultant will provide, prior to the cOlllllencement of the services
required under this agreement the following certificates of insurance to the
City prior to beginning work:
Statutory Worker's COlIIpensation coverage plus $1,000,000 Employers
liability coverage.
General and Automobile Liability coverage to $1,000,000 combined
Single limit which names City as an additional insured, and which is primary
to any policy which the City 8ay otherwise carry (.primary coverage"), and
which treats the employees of the City in the same aanner as embers of the
general public (.cross-liability coverage").
Errors and Omissions insurance to $250,000, unless Errors and
Omissions coverage is included in the General Liability poliCY.
An policies shan be issued by a carrier that has a Best's Rating
of .A, Class V., or better, or shall eet with the approval of the City's Risk
Manager. #
All policies shall provide that same may not be canceled without at
least thirty (30) days written notice to the City.
2. Duties of the City:
a. Consultation and Cooperation.
'"
""'"
"""\
City shall regularly consult the Consultant for the purpose- of
reviewing the progress of the economic analysis and to provide direction and _
gUidance to accOlplish the analysis. ,
-2-
..r;-fT (Q - <0
.
.
.
.
b. eo.pensation.
The COIIpensation to be paid by City to Consultant for all of the
.ork required herein shall be a fee of $27,000.00 (.Fee") payable in progress
payments in an a.ount that the City Manager, or his designee, shall determine
corresponds to the value provided to the City to the date of billing.
Consultant agrees to perform all of the services, provide the analysis and
deliver the Work Product herein required, and in the .anner of the detailed
Scope of Work set forth on the attached Exhibit A.
c. Reductions in Scope of Work.
City ..y from time to time reduce the Scope of Work by the
Consultant to be perfonBed under this Agreement. City and Consultant agree to
..et in good faith and confer for the purpose of negotiating a corresponding
reduction in the Fee associated with said reduction.
d. Additional Scope of Work.
In addition to performing the Defined Services herein set forth,
City Ilay require Consultant to perform additional consulting services related
to the General Duties and Scope of Work (.Additional Services.), and upon
doing so in writing, Consultant shall perform same on a time and Ilaterials
basis at the rates set forth on Exhibit A. All compensation for Additional
Services shall be paid IlOnthly as billed.
3. Administration of Contract:
The City hereby designates the Deputy City Manager, or his written
designee, as its representative for the review and administration of the work
perfonBed by Consultant herein required.
4. Term:
Consultant shall perform all of the Defined Services herein required of
it by not later than May 7, 1991, and shall abide by and comply with any
interim ttllll! frames and milestone dates that are or Ilay be set forth in
Exhibit A.
5. Financial Interests of Consultant:
Consultant warrants and represents that neither he, nor his iamediate
family -..bers, nor his employees or agents (.Consultant Associates.)
presently have any interest, directly # or indirectly, whatsoever in the
property which is the subject matter of the Project, or in any property within
10 radial .l1es from the exterior boundaries of the property which is the
subject utter of the Project, or (.Prohibited Interest.) except as listed on
an attachment.
Consultant further warrants and represents that no promise of future
employment, reDuneration, consideration, gratuity or other reward or gain has
been .ade to Consultant or Consultant Associates. Consultant promises to
advise City of any such promise that .ay be .ade during the Termlf this
Agreement, or for 12 IIOnths thereafter.
-3-
'1 7 ~--,
Consultant agrees that neither Consultant nor his immediate family
members, nor his employees or agents, shall acquire any such Prohibited ~
Interest within the Term of this Agreement, or for 12 months after the 1
expiration of this Agreement.
Consultant may not conduct or solicit any business for any party to this
Agreement, or for any third party whiCh may be in conflict with Consultant's
responsibilities under this Agreement.
6. Hold Harmless:
Consultant shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City, its
elected and appointed officers and employees, from and against all claims for
damages, liability, cost and expense (including without limitation attorneys'
fees) arising out of the conduct of the Consultant, or any agency or employee,
subcontractors, or others in connection with the execution of the work covered
by this Agreement, except only for those claims arising from the sole
negligence or sole willful conduct of the City, its officers, or employees.
Consultant's indemnification shall include any and all costs, expenses,
attorneys' fees and 1 iabil ity incurred by the City, it officers agents, or
employees in defending against such claims, whether the same proceed to
judgment or not. Further, Consultant at its own expense shall, upon written
request by the City, defend any such suit or action brought against the City,
its officers, agents, or employees. Consultants' indemnification of City
shall not be limited by any prior or subsequent declaration by the Consultant.
7. Termination of Agreement for Cause:
If, through any cause, Consultant shall fail to fulfill in a timely and
proper manner his/her obligations under this Agreement, or if Consultant shall
violate any of the covenants, agreements or stipulations of this Agreement,
City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving written notice
to Consultant of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof at
least five (5) days before the effective date of such termination. In that
event, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings,
maps, reports and other materials prepared by Consultant shall, at the option
of the City, become the property of the City, and Consultant shall be entitled
to receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily
completed on such documents and other materials up to the effective date of
Notice of Termination, not to exceed the amounts payable hereunder, and less
any damages caused City by Consultant's breach.
""""
8. Errors and Omissions:
In the event that the Deputy City Manager determines that the
Consultants' negligence, errors, or omissions in the performance of work under
this Agreement has resulted in expense to City greater than would have
resulted if there were no such negligence, errors, omissions in the plans or
contract specifications, Consultant shall reimburse City for the additional
expenses incurred by the City. Nothing herein is intended to limit City's
rights under other provisions of this agreement. .~
""""
-4-
--f-i- (g - ~
.
.
.
.
9. Tenaination of Agreuent for Convenience of City:
City ..y tenainate this Agreement at any time and for any reason for
giving specific written notice to Consultant of such termination and
specifying the effective date thereof, at least thirty (30) days before the
effective date of such termination. In that event, all finished and
unfinished doclllll!nts and other materials described hereinabove shall, at the
option of the City,' become City's sole and exclusive property. If the
Agre..nt is tenainated by City IS provided in this paragraph, Consultant
shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any
satisfactory work cOIIpleted on such documents and other lIaterials to the
effective date of such termination. Consultant hereby expressly waives any
and all claims for dlllages or compensation arising under this Agreement except
as set forth herein.
10. Assignability:
The services of Consultant are personal to the City, and Consultant shall
not assign any interest in this Agreement, and shall not transfer any interest
in the same (whether by assignment or novation), without prior written consent
of City which City .ay unreasonable deny.
11. Ownership, Publication, Reproduction and Use of Material:
All reports, studies, information, data, statistics, forms, designs,
plans, procedures, systems and any other lIaterials or properties produced
under this Agreellent shall be the sole and exclusive property of City. No
such materials or properties produced in whole or in part under this Agreement
shall be subject to private use, copyrights or patent rights by Consultant in
the United States or in any other country without the express written consent
of City. City shall have unrestricted authority to publish, disclose as may
be limited by the provisions of the Public Records Act, distribute, and
otherwise use, copyright or patent, in whole or in part, any such reports,
studies, data, statistics, forms or other materials or properties produced
under this Agreement.
12. Independent Contractor:
City is interested only in the results obtained and Consultant shall
perform as an independent contractor with sole control of the lIanner and means
of performing the services required under this Agreement. City maintains the
right only to reject or accept Consultant'S work Products). Consultant and any
of the Consultant's agents, employees or representatives are, for all purposes
under this Agreement, an independent cont~actor and shall not be deemed to be
an employee of City, and none of them shall be entitled to any benefits to
which City employees are entitled including but not limited to, overtime,
retirement benefits, workers compensation benefits, injury leave or other
leave benefits.
13. Responsible Charge:
Consultant hereby designates that Heinz Schilling shall be ConslllUant's
representative (-Project Manager-) to the project for the duration of -the
project. No substitution for this position shall be allowed without written
approval from the City.
-5-
-9 1- (g-9
14. Administrative Claims Requirements and Procedures
No suft or arbftratfon shall be brought arising out of this agreement, ~
agafnst the Cfty unless a claim has first been presented fn writing and filed
with the Cfty of Chula Vista and acted upon by the City of Chula Vista in
accordance with the procedures set forth fn Chapter 1.34 of the Chula Vista
Munfcfpal Code, as s~ may from tillll! to tfM be amended, the provisions of
which are fncorporatell by this reference as ff fully set forth herein, and
such policfes and procedures used by the City fn the fmplementation of same.
Upon request by City, Consultant shall lIK!et and confer fn good faith with
Cfty for the purpose of resolving any dispute over the terms of this Agreement.
15. Attorney's Fees
Should that dfspute result fn litigation, it fs agree that the prevailing
party shall be entitled to recover all reasonable costs fncurred in the
defense of the claim, fncluding costs and attorney's fees.
16. Statement of Costs.
In the event that Consultant prepares a report or document, or
participates fn the preparation of a report or document as a result of the
scope of work required of Consultant, Consultant shall fnclude, or cause the
fnclusfon, fn said report or document a statement of the numbers and cost in
dollar amounts of all contracts and subcontracts relating to the preparation
of the report or document.
""""
"PC 3543A
~
.i.,..:
-"
~
~-IO-6-
..,-~O
.
t
SIGNATURE TO PAGE TO
AGREEMENT WITH
KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATES, INC.
FOR PREPARATION OF AN ECONOMIC ANALYSIS FOR DEVELOPMENT
this
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Consultant have executed this Agreement
day of , 1991.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
BY:
Leonard M. Moore
Mayor Pro Tempore, City of Chula Vista
KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATES, INC.
BY: ./I~ #. J:t..dk'~
Hef.i':# /Schi11ing (/
. ATTEST:
Beverly Authelet
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
Bruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
#
WPC 3543A
,f::<
~
.
(.Q _ \\ -7-
(;) II
~ r "
"'""\
EXHIBIT LIST TO
AGREEMENT WITH KEYSER HARSTON ASSOCIATES, INC.
Exhibit A. Scope of Work and Schedule
WPC 3543A
........
"I'
........
". ~B-
912-
{e
"
e
~,
,
I
,
~
1
t
EXHIBIT A
PROPOSAL
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS .. GENERIC PROJECI'
WITH AND WITHOUT DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
AND
APPLICATION TO 1WO REAL ESTATE DEVELOPMENTS
Submitted to
City of Chula Vista
February 28, 1991
by
KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIATES, INC.
7690 EI Camino Real, Suite 202
Carlsbad, California 92009
(619) 942-0380
'iJ!I'
(g - \"3>
-'t-f}
KeyserMarstonAssociatesInc.
OBJECTIVE
~
The objective of this assignment is to prepare a model which will allow the City of Chula
Vista to measure in a high-low range the economic benefit of development agreements
which the City may enter in the future with various developers of large-scale primarily
residential developments. Economic benefit can be defined as the value of the risk
reduction to the developer represented by the development agreement.
As envisioned, a typical development agreement will provide a given developer the
guarantee to develop a project at the proposed density, mix of land uses, exactions
known up front, and over a specific time frame.
It is proposed that, initially, the model be generic in nature, assuming a hypothetical
project with a mix of residential and some commercial uses, to be developed over a time
frame of several years. The model will then be subjected to changes which could occur
absent a development agreement to measure the probable financial impact of these
changes. Examples of possible changes and their probable impacts are as follows:
(1) Reductions in nroiect size or density
Reduced number of units will decrease the project's gross revenues;
Changes in density allowance may require site plan revisions or ~
alterations to product type and mix;
Lower density allowance will increase per-unit land costs; and
Smaller project may result in higher per-unit construction costs, due
to decreased economies of scale.
(2) Additional exactions in the fonn of imnact fees
Additional impact fees will decrease the project's gross revenues;
If additional impact fees are passed on to the homebuyer, they will .
result in higher prices; higher prices may, in turn, slow absorption;
and
Project may also face future imposition of regional impact fees.
(3) Limits or moratorium on new develonment
$;
f
f
l
J'
,
.~
Official action or voter referendum may halt or restrict new .
development.
~
/
(g... , \f
9 /0/
.
.
r
,
It
If the project is curtailed, developer may be unable to reap a profit;
and
If the project is delayed, developer will be burdened with excessive
land costs and other carrying costs.
(4) Availability of favorable lendin~ terms
Without a development agreement, the project may face higher
lender fees than it would with a development agreement in place.
A second step in the analysis is to apply the model to two specific large-scale projects,
the developers of which may be seeking development agreements with the City in the
near future. These projects are Rancho del Rey - Phases n and m and Salt Creek
Ranch.
Rancho del Rey is a major mixed residential/co=ercial development by McMillin
Co=unities and Home Capital Development Group. The project consists of 1,582
acres on both sides of East H Street in the eastern portion of Chula Vista. Phases I and
IT, located north of H Street, are currently under construction with a mix of single-family
homes, townhomes, and multi-family apartments. Also planned for this area is the 84-
acre Rancho del Rey Business Center. Sectional Planning Area (SPA) n, located on the
north side of H Street, consists of 567 dwelling units. SPA m, a 400-acre tract of land
on the south side of H Street, is proposed to contain 1,350 dwelling units, mostly single-
family detached homes.
Salt Creek Ranch is a proposed l,21D-acre master-planned co=unity along Proctor
Valley Road. Planned by the Baldwin Company, this development calls for a total of
2,817 housing units.
APPROACH AND SCOPE
KMA's approach to the Economic Analysis will be to assess the probable difference in
economic return from a project if undertaken (1) with a development agreement, and (2)
without a development agreement. In effect, we will conduct a sensitivity analysis .
designed to test the impacts of potential future public policy actions on prototypical
projects. For the purposes of this analysis, we will formulate assumptions regarding
possible scenarios of public intervention that could affect the project in the absence of a
development agreement.:
The following specific work tasks are envisioned for this assignment:
.~
2
(,,-lS""
- f-,r
A. HYPOTHETICAL MODEL
""'"'
I. Proiect Initiation and Data Collection
0 Participate in initiation meeting with City staff.
0 Review existing planning, market, and financial data.
0 Review water hook-up issue relative to projects with and without develop-
ment agreements.
II. Assessment of Potential Public Policv Actions
0 Review/summarize City's existing development regulations and/or growth
restrictions, including:
Subdivision exactions
Development impact fees
Draft growth management plan
Public facility and service threshold standards
""'"'
0 Identify potential development agreement terms to be evaluated, including:
Land use guarantee
Density guarantee
Production schedule guarantee
0 Survey major growth control measures or development restrictions in
selected San Diego County cities.
0 Identify impact(s) of public restrictions in other cities on the production of
new commercial space and/or housing.
0 Brief survey of lenders regarding their perception of the benefits of devel-
opment agreements for master-planned developments.
III. Flnancial Analysis of Prototynical Proiects
.
~ Using a computer-modeled cash flow projection, calculate the prob~le
~ 0
,
i: 3 """"
! (g -ICe
,
9 -1'-
I
.
.
,
~
,
,
t
,
~
income stream from a prototypical project assuming a development agree-
ment
o
Prepare a series of alternative cash flow projections for the project assum-
ing no development agreement This would involve the following steps:
Identify possible public intervention scenarios
Determine probable impact(s) of each scenario
Project revised production and absorption schedules under each
scenario
Project income stream for the project under each scenario
IV. Develonment Aereement Valuation
o Formulate an estimated value for the development agreement in terms of
the probable range and demonstrate supporting methodology.
B. ANALYSIS OF THE 1WO PROJECfS
o Meet with the two developers
o
Review available project information, either provided by developers or in
the EIR's including:
Mix, density, land uses;
Project phasing and absorption projections;
Infrastructure and other development costs.
o Estimate development costs for the uses proposed
o Project sale prices and rents based on independent market overview.
o Prepare cash flow projections, assuming development agreement is in place
and present value of these cash flows.
o
Apply the findings of the hypothetical model and prepare revised cash flow
projections and present values under various assumed changes with no
development agreement in place. }'f
4
(., - 17
--r=r=r-
. . ..
DATA REQUIREMENTS
""""
KMA will require the following data to complete this assignment:
o Relevant plllnni"g and growth management documents (City).
o Available market and financial data (City).
o Detailed project data, as described above.
PRESENTATION
We anticipate the following sequence of work products and meetings:
o Scoping and initiation meeting with key City staff.
o Presentation and review of draft findings of the hypothetical model with
City staff.
o Meeting with the developers.
o Presentation of final conclusions, including six copies of final report.
ADDITIONAL SERVICES
'""'"
Subsequent to the completion of the Economic Analysis, KMA is prepared to participate
in development agreement negotiations between City staff and the developer.
FEE
,
KMA's fee estimates for the workscope is $27,000, broken down as follows:
Hypothetical Model
First Project Analysis (Rancho del Rey - Phases n and ill)
Second Project Analysis (Salt Creek Ranch)
$15,000
$7,000
$5,000
l
.
I
I
t
I
t
f
,
This fee estimate covers the scope of work outlined herein (exclusive of "Additional
Services"); travel expenses; attendance at a maximum four meetings with City staff
and/or the developers; and six copies of the final report. We will invoice the City on a
time-and-materials basis subject to this ceiling unless authorization for additional
expenditure is obtained.
#
5
Gr (~
f-/~
"'""'
- .
If requested, additional meeting attendance or additional services beyond the scope of
work in this proposal would be priced separately on a time-and-materials basis. We have
. attached a schedule of KMA hourly billing rates.
SCHEDULE
The Economic Analysis can be completed within eight weeks of the project initiation
meeting, subject to schedu1ing courtesies, i.e., arranging meetings with City staff and
developers.
e
i
,
~
~
,
~
i
..
t
6
~.. (c;
-- '.'1
.., . .
KeY-serMarstonAssociatesInc.
7690 El Camino Real, Suite 202
Carlsbad. California 92009
619/942-0380 Fax 619/942-3012
~
Heinz A. Schilling
LOS ANGELES 213/622-8095
Richard L. Bolti
Calvin E. Hollis, n
Kathleen H Head
SAN FRANCIS 0415/398-3050
Thnotby C. Ke y
A. Jerry Keyser
Kate Earle Funk
Roben J. \\\otmore
Michael Conlon
Denise E. Conley
~".
March 6,1991
Mr. George Krempl
Deputy City Manager
City of ChuIa Vista
276 4th Avenue
Chula Vista, California 92042
,......"
Re: Economic Analysis for Development Agreements
Dear Mr. Krempl:
Mr. SchiIHng asked me to return to you the enclosed two signed originals of the above
referenced contract.
Thank you.
,
,
Sincerely,
~
KEYSER MARSTON ASSOCIAlES, INC.
~~:v~~~
secret~ Heinz A Schilling
t
f
r
I
t
,
\
-'II!
"""'\
<;..~()
~lo
Real ",...tePredcvcl!'P"""'I&EwluationScrvice.
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PARTY IlISCL{JSURE STATEMENT
,:j,~ of(disclosure:ofcertain ownershipdnterests.! payments. ,or campaign contributions, on all matters
~which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council, Planning Commission, and all other
official bodies. The following infonnation must be disclosed:
1.
List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the contract, i.e., contractor, subcontractor,
material supplier.
KBYSSRMARSTON ASSOCIATES, INC.
;0; . '. . .~. \..I.~. .... '''or
. .........
2. H any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all
individuals owning more. than, 10 % oCthe shares inthe,corporation,or,owning.any partnership interest
in the partnership. '
A. Jerry Keyser Calvin Hollis
Timothy Kelly Heinz A. Schilling
Robert Wetmore
. .3. . Ji., tA.... identified pursuant to (1) above is non-profit organization or a trust, list the names of any
. person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the
trust.
'4. Have youhad<more.thanS2S0 ,worthoCb"..ineq ttafI....l"tM: with any memberof,the.City staff,Ro:lrds,
Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelvemonths7 Yes_
No ~ If yes, please indicate person(s):
S. Please identify each and every person, including any agents, employees, consultants or independent
contractors who you have assigned to represent you before the City in this matter.
Heinz A. Schilling
A. Jerry Keyser
Paul C. Marra
6. Have you and/or your officers or agents, in Lite aggregate, contributed .more than SI,OOO to a
<Councilmember in the currentor"~ingeJection period7 ;Yes _ No ~ H yes, state which
Councilmember(s):
ZmIllIIl is defiaed as: . Any individual, finn, to-parfnosmp. joint W1IlIm!, associJ1llon, social clMb, fraternal org~."~'-.
. __"'. .LIs --" L_ city --" city -..-, ,_" distri'L- -n.;,. ,
".'-'1"" ."ale,trJUl,nceiver, _J,_lC:ate_'n unuanyOl,KrCOunry, unucountry, ,RllMNClpuwty, ctorOlncT. -
nbtiiYision, or tuIY other group or combl/llllion acting as a 1IIIi,. .
(NOTE: AIQch .&Iitiona1 pages as -7)
Date: March 11, 1991
/~/~q~
SignatOre contractor/appli
[A-1131A:D1SCLOSE.TXT)
For KEYSER MAR5$ON ASSOCIATES, INC.
"
Print or type name of contractor/applicant
~: lllJ019O]
. ~
I bj 1:,11'
---YrfJ/
\.
ell ~~~~~J .G _
~~
COUNCIL AGENOA STATEMENT
Item
'1
Meeting Date
3/19/91
ITEM TITLE Resolution I~Oq5:' Authorizing litigation against the County of
San Diego to challenge their newly imposed booking fees, and
appropriating funds therefor
SUBMITTEO BY City Manageg7
City Attorn~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes -X- No___)
It is recommended that the City Attorney and City Manager be authorized to
join with other concerned cities in selecting special counsel to challenge the
San Diego County booking fee and appropriating funds not to exceed $10,000.
RECOMMENDATION: Adopt the resolution.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: N.A.
DISCUSSION:
The San Diego County Board of Supervisors has adopted an ordinance effective
April 1, 1991 imposing booking fees on cities, a copy of which is attached
hereto as Exhibit A.
As proposed by County staff, the booking fee ordinance for 1990-91 would have
resulted in a charge to Chula Vista of $176 per booking, and a total fiscal
year cost of $440,000. As a result of presentations by representatives of the
cities (including Len Moore) to the Board of Supervisors, the Board reduced
the per booking fee to $154, implementing it April 1, 1991, which would result
in a current fiscal year cost to the City of $97,000.
While this reflects an effort by the Board of Supervisors to respond to the
concerns of the cities, and even though the cities through the League of
California Cities have an opportunity to remove the booking fee by identifying
substitute revenue as proposed by AB 169, the basic law is vague and unfair.
Also, if it is not overturned legislatively, the rate implemented by the Board
of Supervisors would cost Chula Vista next year $388,234 (please see a list of
charges to other cities in Exhibit B attached). In addition, a committee of
City Attorneys has reviewed the ordinance and believes that a good faith
argument exists as to whether or not the fee is legitimate.
Finally, there is different methodology that can be used to determine the
amount of the fee, even if it is legally supportable, and it may be that the
lowered fee adopted by the Board still may be too high. Litigation will allow
a proper amount for the fee to be judicially determined.
7 - (
Page 2, Item No. ?
Meeting Date 3/19/91
The issues are common to all cities with police departments in the County and
the litigation can be handled by one attorney on behalf of all with the costs
divided in proportion to the amount of fees at stake. If the Council wishes
to proceed and litigate the fee with the County as is herein recommended,
adopt the attached resolution which authorizes the City Attorney and City
Manager in consultation with other interested cities to select special counsel
to file the lawsuit. The resolution would not be effective unless approved by
five of the other six cities in the County with police departments.
It is unfortunate that State legislation has put the cities and the County in
a position of being in an adversarial relationship over booking fees.
Especially in this County, the cooperation between the County and the cities
is probably the best in the State. Unfortunately, Chula Vista and the other
cities must contend with this State law and so, as a result, litigation is
being recommended.
FISCAL IMPACT: Appropriate $10,000 from the unappropriated balance of the
General Fund into Account 100-0150-5201.
bkga113
? -'J-
RESOLUTION NO. I~S"
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING LITIGATION
AGAINST THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO TO CHALLENGE
THEIR NEWLY IMPOSED BOOKING FEE
The City of Chula vista does hereby resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the County of San Diego has adopted an
ordinance imposing a booking fee which Chula vista believes exceeds
the legitimate costs for that service as authorized by state law;
and,
WHEREAS, Chula vista wishes to join with other affected
cities in the common effort to have the legitimate amount of the
fee judicially determined.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, ORDER AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the above recitations are true and correct.
Section 2. That the City Manager and the City Attorney are
authorized in consultation and cooperation with other affected
cities to join in a common effort to file litigation against San
Diego challenging their newly adopted booking fee. The cities
shall be represented by a single counsel selected by a consensus of
the city attorneys and city managers.
Section 3. That a sum not to exceed $10,000 is appropriated
from the unappropriated balance of the General Fund into the City
Attorney's Professional Services Account 100-0150-5201.
Section 4.
conditional upon
least five other
That the authority herein granted shall be
approval of substantially similar measures by at
interested cities.
ed ~d ri ov::po~
by:
ruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
?-3/1-<I
INFORI1ATION C~PY 8
ALL NEW MATERIAL
ORDINANCE NO.
(NEW SERIES)
AN ORDINANCE TO ADD DIVISION 4 (COMMENCING WITH
SECTION 34.101) TO TITLE 3 OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY
CODE OF REGULATORY ORDINANCES RELATING TO
FEES FOR BOOKING OR OTHER PROCESSING
The Board of Supervisors of the County of San Diego ordains
as follows:
section 1. Division 4 (commencing with section 34.101) is
hereby added to Title 3 of the San Diego County Code of
Regulatory Ordinances to read:
DIVISION 4
FEES FOR BOOKING OR OTHER PROCESSING
Sec. 34.101. PURPOSE. The purpose of this Division is to
implement in San Diego County the provisions of Government Code
section 29550 which authorize counties to impose a fee upon
various local governmental entities for reimbursement of county
expenses incurred with respect to the booking or other processing
of persons arrested and brought to the county jails for booking
or detention by employees of the local governmental entities.
Sec. 34.102. FEE IMPOSED. (a) There is hereby imposed
upon every city, special district, school district, community
college district, college, or university in San Diego County a
fee equal to the actual administrative costs, including
applicable overhead costs, incurred by the County in booking or
other processing of persons arrested and brought to any county
jail by an employee of the specified entities for booking or
detention. For purposes of this division the term "employee"
shall include any person making an arrest on behalf of an entity
specified above, regardless of whether the person is an employee
of the specified entity for worker's compensation, employee
benefits, tort liability, or any other purpose.
(b) The fee shall be payable in respect to bookings of
persons at a County jail on and after 5ul~ 1, 199Q.
Ap" I I; 19 ~ i.
(c) The fee shall not be applicable to re-bookings. Re-
bookings occur when an additional charge is filed against a
person already booked and in custody in a County jail.
(d)
after an
remanded
detained
The fee shall not be applicable to bookings that occur
arrestee has been arraigned and ordered by a court to be
to the custody of the Sheriff, if the arrestee was
in a city jailor holding facility prior to arraignment.
;-)
mtfB'T A
.
R
(e)
The fee shall not be applicable to self-bookings.
(f) The fee shall not be applicable to boo};ings resulting
from arrests made by employees of a local governmental
entity on warrants issued on behalf of the County or
the Sheriff for alleged criminal activities in the
unincorporated area ~~~he County.
C:>'1.0()____
Sec. 34.103. FEE AMOUNT. ~The amount of the fee imposed
pursuant to section 34.102 is ~ for each person booked at a
County jail. The specified fee is equal to the administrative
costs, including applicable overhead costs as permitted by
Federal Circular A-87 standards, incurred by the County in
booking or other processing of arrested persons in County jails.
Sec. 34.104. FEE COLLECTION. (a) The Sheriff shall
quarterly in arrears submit an invoice to the local governmental
entities responsible for payment of the fee imposed by this .
division, notifying them of the total amount of the fee for the
preceding quarter. The responsible local governmental entities
shall pay the fee to the Sheriff within thirty (30) days of the
date of the invoice: provided, however, that the fees for the
first three quarters of the 1990-91 fiscal year shall be payable
in one lump sum within thirty days of the date of the invoice for
that period.
(b) Fees which remain unpaid in whole or in part after
thirty days shall bear interest at the legal rate established
pursuant to Code of civil Procedure section 685.010 on the
balance unpaid.
(c) In addition to any other remedy available to it, the
County may offset any delinquent fees, plus accrued interest,
against any amount reciprocally owing in accordance with the
provisions of Government Code section 907, and the Auditor-
controller is hereby authorized and directed to offset in
accordance with Government Code section 907.
Sec. 34.105. EXEMPTION AND WAIVER. (a) The City of San
Diego shall be exempt from the fees imposed by this division for
all bookings or other processing occurring during the 1990-91
fiscal year.
(b) The Board of Supervisors by resolution may waive fees
upon a finding that the loss of funds resulting from such waiver
is offset by a benefit to the public of equal or greater value.
Sec. 34.106. MULTI-AGENCY ARRESTS. Where two or more
governmental entities, including local, state and federal
entities, are responsible for an arrest and subsequent booking,
each participating local governmental entity specified in section
34.102 shall only be billed for its pro rata share of the fee.
-2-
)-(0
cs
The pro rata share shall be determined by dividing the total fee
by the total number of local, state or federal governmental
entities participating in the arrest and booking.
Sec. 34.107. REGULATIONS. The Chief Administrative Officer
shall prepare necessary rules and regulations governing the
application and administration of the fee imposed by this
division. Such rules and regulations shall become effective upon
approval of the Board of Supervisors by resolution.
Sec. 34.108. SEVERABILITY. If any section, subsection,
sentence, clause, or phrase of this division is for any reason
held to be invalid or unconstitutional by a decision of any court
of any competent jurisdiction, such decision shall not affect the
validity of the remaining portions of this chapter. The Board of
Supervisors hereby declares that it would have passed this
division, a.nd each and every section, subsection, sentence,
clause, or phrase not declared invalid or unconstitutional
without regard to whether any portion of this division would be
subsequently declared invalid or unconstitutional.
"'_L~ b--1---
~.~ ,. '. '.'----..
-3-
7,,7
SAN DIEGO COUNTY BOOKING FEE
CITY # BOOKINGS BOOKING COST @ $154.
CARLSBAD 1,501 $ 231,154.
CORONADO 399 $ 61,446.
CHULA VISTA 2,521 $ 388,234.
DEL MAR 215 $ 33,110.
EL CAJON 3,561 $ 548,394.
ENCINITAS 2,093 $ 322,322.
ESCONDIDO 3,651 $ 562,254.
IMPERIAL BEACH 737 $ 113,498.
LA MESA 1,006 $ 154,924.
LEMON GROVE 840 $ 129,360.
NATIONAL CITY 2,742 $ 422,268.
OCEANS IDE 6,996 $ 1,077,384.
POWAY 955 $ 147,070.
SAN DIEGO 39,811 $ 6,130,894.
SAN MARCOS 1,091 $ 168,014.
SANTEE 1,207 $ 185,878.
SOLANA BEACH 455 $ 68,530.
VISTA 2,722 $ 419,188.
TOTAL CITIES 72,493 $ 11,163,922.
COUNTY/OTHERS 29,410 $ 4,529,140.
TOTAL 101,903 $ 15,693,062.
7-$
gHIBIT 8
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
~
ITEM TITLE:
Meeting Date 3/19/91
Resolution /t.oCffD Approving the Greg Rogers Park Master
Plan and adopting the Negative Declaration for IS-90-51
Director of Parks and Recreation~
City Managey (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No-xJ
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
Since July of 1989, the department has been working with the architectural
firm of Gillespie/Delorenzo and Associates to design a master plan for Greg
Rogers Park. Numerous meetings have been held with the architects and staff.
Staff has conducted several publ ic meetings to gather comments and concerns
from the community which have been addressed in the proposed plan.
The Master Plan was financed by the Great American Development Company as a
condition of approval of the Tentative Subdivision Map for Rancho del Sur,
Chula Vista Tract 87-8. In addition to financing preparation of the plan, the
developer will make $100,000 of improvements to Greg Rogers Park, per the
Sunbow Public Facilities Financing Plan approved by Council on February 20,
1990. These improvements shall be consistent with the Master Plan.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the Greg Rogers Park Master Pl an, and
adopt Negative Declaration for IS-90-51.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: The Parks and Recreation Commission at
the February 21, 1991 meeting, unanimously approved the plan.
DISCUSSION:
The development of the master plan has been a lengthy process which included a
series of community meetings, two reviews by the Parks and Recreation
Commission, and a review by the City Council. A brief history of review
process follows.
On November 2, 1989 a community meeting was held at the Girls and Boys Club of
Chul a Vi sta. The Department ut il i zed two strategies to inform the publ i c
about this meeting: 1) a notice was sent on two occasions to 525 homes and 11
youth sports organizations, and 2) a press release was published in the
Star-News. Despite these efforts only 11 people participated. The publ ic
comments included:
1. Drainage and erosion problems around the slopes and ballfields.
2. Insufficient lighting in the park.
3. Inadequate storage for little league equipment.
4. Access to the ballfields for safety and emergency vehicles.
5. Concern about when the Master Plan will be implemented.
~.I
Page 2, Item 1l
Meeting Date 3/19/91
The Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed the plan on March IS, 1990, and
voted unanimously to support the plan and recommended its approval to the City
Counc il .
The City Council reviewed the plan at their meeting on November 20, 1990.
During this review, a number of citizens expressed concern about the
configuration and location of one of the parking areas. Council referred the
item back to staff for further community review and comment.
A second community meeting was conducted on January 16, 1991 at the Girls and
Boys Club. The meeting was publicized in the Star News, and notices were
mailed to 550 homes in the vicinity of the park. Approximately 35 people were
in attendance at the meeting. The major areas of concern expressed by the
residents were the location of the parking areas, the location and
orientation of the ballfield at the north end of the park, and the involvement
of the school district property in the plan. Staff and the Architect
collected these concerns and formulated alternative park master plans.
Residents who attended the January 16 meeting were mailed an invitation to
attend a follow-up session concerning the park. Approximately 20 people
attended the second presentation. The group reached a consensus on the
selection of the park alternative which is before you tonight.
The Parks and Recreation Commission reviewed the proposed master plan at their
meeting on February 21, 1991, and recommended approval of the proposed plan to
Council. There were, however, some questions about the night 1 ighting of
ballfields and the feasibility of having turn-out lanes to the parking lots
off Oleander Avenue. The residents that were in attendance at the previous
presentations were notified of the Commission meeting.
Staff also presented the plan to the teachers and principal of Greg Rogers
Elementary School. Several members of the school's PTA and the school
district's administrative office were also in attendance. The school district
staff supported the alternative selected by the resident group, and expressed
an interest in a joint project between the City and the school district in
developing a jogging and walking trail at the north end of the park.
As a result of these meetings, staff supports the revised plan and recommends
its approval.
The 47-acre Greg Rogers Park features a number of facil ities at its Oleander
Avenue location. These include the security residence, restroom building,
playground, maintenance building, picnic area, Little League baseball fields
and the Gi rl s and Boys Cl ubs. Other promi nent features i ncl ude panoramic
views, steep slopes and a passive area of grassy, rolling terrain. Although
these characteri st i cs are compat i bl e wi th a tradi t i ona 1 "park" image, there
are some significant functional problems that need correcting:
1. The maintenance facility is located in the center of a passive picnicking
area. This facility dominates the entire area taking up space that could
be used for more appropriate park activities. In addition, the building
interferes with the view shed and inhibits the relationship between the
picnic area and the playground.
t.~
Page 3, Item 1r.
Meeting Date 3/19/91
The ballfield complex is poorly planned with the fields located on
different levels, whose slopes have serious erosion problems.
associated concessions building and spectator seating are in
physical condition.
3. There are no pedestrian circulation paths that connect the various parts
of the park or the surrounding community.
2.
three
The
poor
4. Several of the existing park facilities are not capable of serving their
intended functions. These i ncl ude the security res idence, the restroom
building and the concessions building. The security residents program
was first initiated in 1980. The Department views the effectiveness of
this program as marginal. The removal of the trailer would most likely
take place in Phase Three of the Master Plan's implementation.
The restroom building is an old concrete masonry structure built when the
park was first developed. It is in poor shape and needs to be replaced
with a facility that will meet modern standards (i.e., vandal resistant
fixtures). In addition, because of the poor condition of the existing
little league concession stand, the Master Plan proposes a new structure
and storage area be built.
5. The existing playground is too small and is not equipped with adequate
play facilities. It is also too far away from the picnic area and the
restroom.
6. The picnicking facilities for the park are inadequate and improperly
located. Also, there are no facilities to accommodate large groups.
7. Overall park landscaping (including planting, irrigation and lighting) is
in need of substantial upgrading.
The proposed Master Plan for thi s park addresses each of these and other
important design features, and proposes a sol ut i on that wi 11 benefi t park
visitors, City maintenance personnel and Parks and Recreation staff. A copy
of the Pl an is attached to thi s report. The major recommendations for Greg
Rogers Park are:
1. Develop the picnic area as the focal point of the passive portion of the
park. By relocating the maintenance facility, the center of the park is
opened up. This prime location is then occupied with large-group picnic
shelters, single family picnic units consisting of table, grill, waste
receptacle, new playground play equipment, new restroom building and
parking. These facilities will be sited to take advantage of the
excellent views from the park and to enhance the existing grassy terrain.
2. Improve the ballfields. This would include expansion of the lower field
by grading the lower area into a single continuous pad. This expansion
would allow for soccer play. The upper field would be the smaller "Pee
Wee" field and the lower area would be for softball and baseball. New
g"3
1\'
Page 4, Item~
Meeting Date 3/19/91
restroom/concessions, storage building and spectator seating are also
proposed. The seating area would be built into the slopes separating the
upper and lower fields, creating a unique and functional complex.
Lighting of one field for night use is also recommended as an optional
item in this Master Plan. Final approval of ballfield lights would be
considered by Council prior to the implementation of Phase II of the
Master Plan.
3. Relocate the maintenance facility to a separate graded pad along East
Palomar Street. This location provides convenient access for City
maintenance crews without conflicting with the park users. Access to the
park from the maintenance hcil ity is vi a a concrete wal k that connects
with the park circulation system.
4. Develop a complete pedestrian trail system to 1 ink the various park
activity centers. The trail system would have 8 ft. concrete walks that
can accommodate mai ntenance and securi ty vehicl es as well as pedestri an
traffic. Main walks and circulation corridors should be handicapped
accessible, thus increasing the level of service the park can offer to
local residents.
5. Enhance several other items to park fac il it i es and equ i pment. These
include expanded parking, an upgraded irrigation system, additional
plantings, new security lighting, park furniture, and picnic tables.
Rancho del Sur Partners has committed, per Council Resolution 1115525, Sunbow
Public Facilities Financing Plan, $100,000 to implement a portion of Phase 2
of the Master Plan. Based on the community's input, particularly from
representatives of Orangeview Little League, the Department believes that
these funds should be expended on repairing the ball fields and re-establishing
the eroding slopes around the ballfields. The Department will also
investigate the possibility of installing a water efficient irrigation system
within this area.
Overall, the Department believes that this Master Plan, if adopted and
implemented, will result in a much more functional and aesthetically pleasing
park for the community to enjoy.
FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of completing the Master Plan is $3,400,340. Staff
envisions the Master Plan could be incrementally funded as monies become
available from a variety of sources such as Park Acquisition and Development
fees, Residential Construction Tax, State grants, and other sources. Per the
Sunbow Public Facilities Financing Plan, $100,000 has been set aside for
certain park and field improvements.
WPC 1617R
Z..1
n\
/-JlV
v'
RESOLUTION NO. /toOfCo
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE GREG ROGERS PARK
MASTER PLAN AND ADOPTING THE NEGATIVE
DECLARATION FOR IS-90-51
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, since July, 1989,
Department has been working with
Gillespie/DeLorenzo and Associates
Greg Rogers Park; and
the Parks and
the architectural
to design a Master
Recreation
firm of
Plan for
WHEREAS, the Master Plan was financed by Great American
Development Company as a condition of approval of the Tentative
Subdivision Map for Rancho del Sur, Chula Vista Tract 87-8; and
WHEREAS, in addition to financing preparation of the
plan, the developer will make $100,000 of improvements to Greg
Rogers park, per the Sunbow Public Facilities Financing Plan
approved by Council on February 20, 1990 and these improvements
shall be consistent with the Master Plan.
WHEREAS, the Parks and Recreation Commission at its
February 21, 1991, meeting uninimously approved the Greg Rogers
Park Master Plan.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula Vista does hereby approve the Greg Roger s
ParkMaster Plan, a copy of which is on file in the office of the
City Clerk, and adopts the Negative Declaration for IS-90-51.
Jess Valenzuela, Director of
Parks and Recreation
8048a
~
, City Attorney
Presented by
ed as
1S I 8-/1-
Minutes of a
Regular Meeting of the
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
Thursday 6:00 p.m.
January 17, 1991
**REVlSED**
Parks and Recreation
Conference Room
*******************
CALL MEETING TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
MEMBERS PRESENT:
MEMBER LATE:
MEMBER ABSENT:
Commissioners Lind, Roland, Willett
Chair Sandoval-Fernandez (6:15)
Commissioner Hall
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Motion to approve the minutes of the meeting of December 13, 1990 as
distributed.
MSC LIND/ROLAND 3-0 (Sandoval-Fernandez out)
2 . PUBLIC HEARINGS OR REMARKS
NONE
3. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Criteria for Membershio in EastLake Golf Course
Item continued until February meeting.
4. NEW BUSINESS
a. Golf Course Fee Increase
Director Valenzuela gave a brief overview of American Gol~'s proposal
for a fee increase. He stated that staff's reV1ew of the
request revealed that the proposed fees were below one third of all golf
courses in San Diego County. This proposal has also been endorsed by
the Men's Club. Johnny Gonzales and Bert Geisendorf were present to
represent American Golf.
The Commissioners discussed the potential Stage IV water alert and the
impact that this would have on the Golf Course. Mr. Geisendorf stated
that if necessary the golf course could go back to using well water for
irrigation, even though it is not considered desirable due to high
i..7
salinity.
Mr. Bill Anderson, a resident of Chula Vista, spoke in opposition to the
proposed fee increase. Mr. Anderson is not pleased with the current
physical condition of the golf course and he feels that he has been
treated in a rude manner by some American Golf employees, because of
this, he opposes the currently proposed rate increase.
Mr. George Laury, a resident of Chula Vista, spoke in opposition to the
fee increase. Mr. Laury stated that while he has always been treated
with respect at the golf course, he has found some things in disrepair
such as the drinking fountain in the pro shop and some of the greens and
doesn't feel that there should be an increase in fees until these items
are handled.
Mr. Douglas Hawkins, a resident of Bonita, compared the rates of other
golf courses in the area; Balboa and Torrey Pines. He would like to see
a special rate for Chula Vista residents a monthly rate, and a rate for
seniors. He feels that a one year span is too short for another rate
increase. Mr. Hawkins stated that he could play EastLake cheaper than
he could play his own city-owned golf course.
Mr. Tom O'Connor, a resident of Chula Vista, finds the American Golf
employees to be extremely courteous and helpful. In addition, he feels
that American Golf has done a very good job in maintaining the golf
course. He has compared the green fees with other golf courses in the
area and finds them to be lower even though conditions at the Chula
vista golf course are better maintained than the other courses.
Park Superintendent Foncerrada stated that the proposed fee increase is
in line with rates at other comparable courses in the area. He further
stated that American Golf has complied with all of the terms and
conditions of their contract. He has not received any complaints from
citizens or golf course patrons about conditions at the golf course.
It is his opinion that the golf course is in the best condition it has
ever been in. Mr. Foncerrada pointed out to the Commission that
American Golf has completed a number of capital improvement projects
that are above and beyond what the initial contract called for.
Chair Sandoval-Fernandez stated that, based on the input received, she
feels that is too soon for the Commission to make a decision. She would
like to see an example of a tiered fee schedule, with one fee for Chula
Vista residents and a different fee for non-residents, and also a
specification on timelines as to when some of the improvement items are
to be done.
commissioner willett requested that staff verify some of the rates that
have been quoted by some of the members of the public. He also noted
that some clubs are trying to hold the amount of their rate increases
to the CPI this year, and stated that the rate increase currently
proposed by American Golf exceeds the CPl.
Motion to table this issue until February, have American Golf come back
with a two-tiered proposal or three-tiered proposal, have staff analyze
~--i
this proposal and have staff check on current rate structures at
comparable facilities in San Diego County and clarify the timelines on
issues related to the contract.
MSC SANDOVAL-FERNANDEZ//LIND 4-0
b. CV2000 Reports
At the request of the Chair, Director Valenzuela briefed the Commission
on the report highlighting those recommendations which he considered
most significant, and gave a status report on those CV2000
recommendations which were currently being acted upon.
Commissioner Roland doesn't think it is a good idea for the city to buy
land in the immediate vicinity of a school because if the school needs
to expand with the growth of the City, the land will be needed by the
school.
Commissioner willett feels that the City should acquire the property
under redevelopment so if you do need to increase the school or the park
the land will already be in the pUblic domain.
Chair Sandoval-Fernandez referred to Page 6 and the statement about
multi-cultural and ethnic changes taking place in the community, and
cautioned staff not to frame that in a negative context. She feels that
the statement, while phrased very delicately, could be interpreted in
a manner that is derogatory to the Hispanic population.
Motion to approve in content the recommendations that are set forth in
the CV2000 report.
MSC WILLETT/LIND 4-0
c. GMOC Report - Park Issues
Director Valenzuela recapped the concerns expressed by the GMOC, and
staff's response to these concerns.
One of the main concerns of the GMOC is that PAD fees be used
appropriately. Director Valenzuela stated that no PAD fees would be
used for park upgrades unless a nexus could be drawn.
Motion to approve the recommendations.
MSC ROLAND/WILLETT 4-0
d. PAD Fee Increase
Director Valenzuela introduced Principal Management Assistant Stokes who
gave the Commission a recap of the process and criteria used to arrive
at the proposed PAD fee increase.
Commissioner Willett stated that based on recent research he has done
~,,?
in this area, it is his opinion that the figures proposed by staff are
appropriate.
Motion to accept the report and send it forward to Council with the
commission's recommendation.
MSC WILLETT/SANDOVAL-FERNANDEZ 4-0
e. EastLake Park Tour
Director Valenzuela stated Commissioner Hall had called him requesting
that the Commission accept Mr. Bob Santos invitation to go on a tour of
the EastLake Park site, and discuss the existing condition and future
plans for the area.
Commissioner willett recommended that the Commission have an updated map
before the tour.
Chair Sandoval-Fernandez suggested that Commissioner Hall should be
consulted before setting a date for the tour as he had specifically
expressed an interest in attending. She further suggested that if
Commissioner Hall's schedule could accommodate it, a lunch time tour
would be appropriate.
Commissioner willett will be out of town through January 31, 1991.
f. 4th and Oranae Avenue Park site
Director Valenzuela stated that based on actions taken at the joint
meeting of the Parks and Recreation Commission and the Library Board,
the concept park plan has been tabled. It is hoped that deferring this
plan to the library will facilitate their acquisition of an $8 million
grant to build a library on the site.
Per the Commission's request at that meeting, a letter has been drafted
to Council, reminding them that there still is a park plan for, and
interest in having a park at, that site. Director Valenzuela drew the
Commission's attention to the draft of that letter which was included
in their packets and asked for comments.
It was the consensus of the Commissioners that the letter, with minor
revision by Chair Sandoval-Fernandez, be signed and sent to Council.
g. Tennis Center Aareement
Acting Recreat~on Superintendent Gates gave an overview of Council's
recommendation on the Tennis Center agreement, in particular, the GPA
requirement.
commissioner willett has done a detailed study of the situation, and
found that there has never been a student dismissed from the program
because of the scholastic requirement. He sees it as an incentive for
the students to keep their grades up.
~"/O
Director Valenzuela pointed out that the California Interscholastic
Federation's standard is 2.0, and he felt that Council was trying to
make this program consistent with this standard.
Commissioner Lind stated that in his opinion, the scholastic requirement
was not a big issue either way, because the type of youth involved in
the program would be getting good grades anyway.
Motion to support Council's recommendation and send the agreement back
to Council.
MSUC WILLETT/LIND 3-1 (Sandoval-Fernandez opposed)
h. Goals
Director Valenzuela presented the Commission with the Department's goals
for the upcoming year.
Commissioner willett commended the Director on the goals statement.
Motion to accept the departmental goals.
MSC WILLETT/ROLAND 4-0
** Motion to add Terra Nova Park Improvement plan revisions to the agenda
as an emergency item.
MSC WILLETT/ROLAND 4-0
i. Terra Nova Park Improvement Plan Revisions
Director Valenzuela introduced Nick DeLorenzo of Gillespie/ DeLorenzo
who presented the revisions and refinements to the Terra Nova Park
Improvement Plan. He did a comparison of the former and current plan
and discussed the reasons why the changes were made.
In response to Commissioner willett's questions Mr. DeLorenzo assured
the Commission that the soccer field still meets AYSO standards.
Motion to accept the revised concept plan.
MSC WILLETT/ROLAND 4-0
5. COMMUNICATIONS
a. Written Correspondence
NONE
b. Commissioner's Comments
WILLETT
Commended Director Valenzuela on his presentation of
V~I/
Department goals, and stated that he is going to present them to the
Chula Vista 21 Committee as a guideline.
commissioner willett would like the Commission to be notified of all
public hearings involving parks.
LIND - Requested that the Youth Sports Council be advised when playing
fields are going to be taken out of service.
Asked if the water restrictions will have an effect on ballfields.
The Director confirmed that all parks, open space and ballfields will
be affected by the water restrictions.
ROLAND - Expressed his concerns about placing parks under power lines.
6. MONTHLY REPORT OF DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY AND COUNCIL ACTION
Director Valenzuela announced the appointment of Sunny Shy to the
position of Recreation Director for the Department.
ADJOURNMENT to the regularly scheduled meeting of February 21, 1991.
Respectively submitted,
'ca~lII#,
<1..-1 2..
PROJECT NAME: Greg Rogers Park Master Plan
PROJECT LOCATION: 1101 Oleander Avenue
PROJECT APPLICANT: City of Chula Vista Parks & Recreation Dept.
CASE NO: IS-90-51
DATE: July 18, 1990
A. Pro;ect Settinq
The 47-acre project site is currently a partially developed,
partially natural open space conununity park in the middle of a
largely developed residential area. The Boys' and-Girls' Clubs
facilities are located within the park site. The site is bounded
on the west by Oleander Avenue, west of which are single-family
detached houses. It is bounded on the north by Greg Rogers
School. The Foxhills and Sunbow housing developments and associ-
ated recreational facilities are inunediately east of the Park.
The southern part of the project site includes a drainage, south
of which is Parkview School. However, the City's General Plan
indicates that the future eastward extension of East Palomar
Street will probably cut across this area. In addition, the Park
boundaries include an irregularly-shaped parcel to the south of
East Palomar Avenue and west of Oleander Avenue.
B. Pro;ect DescriPtion
The project proposes a Master Plan for the renovation and rede-
velopment of the existing park facilities to make the park mor~
useful. Specific Plan proposals include:
1. Relocation of the maintenance building.
2. Revising the layout of the ballfields and construction
of a new restroom/concession/storage building and
spectator seats.
3. Upgrading of landscaping and irrigation system,
including the addition of landscaping along the eastern
boundary to provide a visual buffer between the Park
and the pool/recreation area within the residential
development to the east.
~../~
-
-,-/ - ~
4. Relocation and upgrading of the picnic area, including
the provision of picnic areas for large groups.
5. Relocation of a paved pedestrian trail system.
6. Upgrading of playground equipment.
7. Installation of security lighting and removal of the
security residence.
8. Lighting of the lower ballfields.
9. Paving and striping of the main parking lot and
creation of a second lot.
10. Provision of additional park furniture (benches, waste
receptacles, bicycle parking racks, etc.).
11. Construction of a large entry monument.
Approximately 3 of the 47 acres will be graded, primarily in the
vicinity of the ballfield complex. The proposed new structures
will be 800 square feet and 450 square feet, with a maximum
height of 12 feet. An estimated 4,840 square feet within the
Park will consist of road and paved surfaces, including 182
parking spaces. An estimated 15 to 20 acres of the Park will
remain as natural open space.
The Master Plan proposes that the Park improvements be developed
in three phases. The first phase would entail measures to
control erosion on the ballfield slopes. The second phase would
include the grading of the multi-purpose playing fields. The
third phase would include the remaining improvements.
C. Compatibility ~ Zoninq ~ Plans
The project site is designated for Parks and Recreation uses, and
is zoned R-l. The land to the north and south, which includes
schools, is designated for Public and Quasi-pUblic uses and is
zoned R-l also. The land to the east is designated for Low
Medium Residential and Open Space uses and is zoned R-1-4-P and
R-S-4. The land to the west is designated for Low Medium
Residential and Open Space uses and is zoned R-l. The proposed
project is in conformance with the existing General Plan land use
designation and zoning, and is compatible with the designated
land uses and zoning for the surrounding properties. The
proposed Park improvements will enhance the Park's utility and
visual appearance.
~ ..tt!
-+7 -,.
O. Compliance ~ ~ Threshold/Standards Policy
1. Fire/EMS
The Thresholds/Standards Policy requires that fire and
medical units must be able to respond to calls within 7
minutes or less in 95% of the cases and within 5
minutes or less in 75% of the cases. The Fire
Department indicated that the nearest fire station is
approximately 3 miles from the site and that the. site
can be reached in approximately 5 minutes. Therefore,
the project is in compliance with this policy.
2. Police
The Thresholds/Standards Policy requires that police
units must respond to Priority I calls within 7 minutes
or less and maintain an average response time to all
Priority I calls of 4.5 minutes or less. Police units
must respond to Priority 2 calls within 7 minutes or
less and maintain an average response time to all
Priority 2 calls of 7 minutes or less. The Police
Department is currently maintaining an acceptable level
of service based on the threshold standard and does not
anticipate any adverse impacts as a result of the
project. Therefore, the project is considered to be
compatible with this policy.
3. Traffic
The Thresholds/Standards Policy requires that all
intersections must operate at a Level of Service (LOS)
"C. or better, with the exception that LOS "0" may
occur during the peak two hours of the day at signal-
ized intersections. Intersections west of I-80S are
not to operate at a LOS below their 1987 LOS. No
intersection should reach LOS "F" during the average
weekday peak hour. The project is expected to result
in approximately three trips per acre, or 141 daily
trips. The City Engineering Department noted that
Oleander Avenue in the project vicinity is currently
operating at LOS B and is not expected to change as a
result of the project. Therefore, the project is
considered to be compatible with this policy.
-
~, I':>
-R-7
. 4. Parks ..~ Recreation
The Thresholds/Standards Policy requires 3 acres of
park and recreation land for every 1,000 people. The
Policy applies only to residential projects and is,
therefore, not applicable to the proposed project.
However, the proposed Park improvements wi 11 enhance
the quality of the recreation area.
5. Drainaqe
The Thresholds/Standards Policy requires that storm
water flows and volumes shall not exceed City Engineer
standards. The City Engineering Depa~tment has indi-
. 'cated that the 36-inch PCC flowing easterly into the
rip rap apron, the 8-inch RCP and 12-inch CMP flowing
west into the drainage system in Oleander Avenue, and
the off-site 72-inch RCP flowing south in Oleander and
then in a westerly direction south of East Palomar
Street are adequate to serve the proposed project. In
addition, the Department indicated that the City will
coordinate with Rancho Oel Sur for any eastwardly
flowing drainage discharge. Therefore, the project is
considered to be compatible with City policy.
6. Sewer
The Thresholds/Standards Policy requires that sewage
flows and volumes shall not exceed City Engineering
standards. It is estimated that the project could
result in the generation of approximately 6,230 gallons
of sewage per day. The City Engineering Department has
indicated that the two 8-inch sewer lines that flow
south in Oleander Avenue can adequately handle the
projected flow. Therefore, no significant impacts are
anticipated and the project is considered to be compat-
ible with City policy.
7. Water
The Thresholds/Standards Policy requires that adequate
storage, treatment, and transmission facilities are
constructed concurrently with planned growth and that
water quality standards are not jeopardized during
growth and construction. There is no estimate
avai lable as to exactly how much more water will be
required to maintain the Park as proposed. The
increased landscaping may require more water than the
existing Park facilities. However, the new low-flush
toi lets and faucets, and the upgrading of the
irrigation system may correct existing inefficiencies.
The project is not expected to significantly impact
either the quality or quantity of water available to
Chula Vista residents. Therefore, it is considered to
be compatible with the City policy.
1(-lb
-r-r=:f-
E. Identification 2f Environmental Effects
1. Public Safety, Liqht ~ Glare
The project proposes to install security lighting and
lighting at the athletic fields. This wi 11 resul t in
the introduction of light into areas not currently
illuminated at night. This could potentially impact
nearby residents both directly and indirectly, and
could affect them both beneficially and adversely. . The
increased night lighting may result in an increase in
the level of sports activity at night, such as baseball
or soccer games. This could beneficially impact the
community, by providing a wider range of accepted
recreational opportunities and also by possibly de-
creasing any illicit activities that may occur on the
Park grounds at night and, thus, increasing public
safety. It would also provide a close outlet for
youths ,living in nearby houses. However, the increased
lighting could have indirect glare and light impacts on
nearby residents. It is anticipated that these
potential impacts wi 11 be reduced to'a 1 evel of
insignificance by the proposed landscaping to be
installed along Oleander Avenue and by the type and
orientation of the lighting system to be used. The
large trees proposed will somewhat act as a visual
buffer between the residences to the west of Oleander
and the Park.
2. Noise
The potential for increasing use at the Park,
particularly at night, could increase the noise level
in the general vicinity of the Park. There are an
estimated five or six houses to the west of the
proposed athletic fields that could experience higher
levels of noise at night than currently exist but which
may not be considered significant. The prevailing
westerly wind will generally carry sound more to the
east than to the west. Since the area to the east
consists of a private recreation area, no impacts are
anticipated.
cr..ll
~
3. Aesthetics/Visual Quality
The existing Park currently offers a pleasant respite
from the surrounding urbanization, with a grassy picnic
area and views to the east and southeast. The pleasant
vista will be temporarily impacted during project
implementation by the construction equipment. However,
these impacts will be temporary and will be mitigated
by the proposed landscaping, which is more extensive
than currently exists.
4. Recreation
The usability of the existing Park will be reduced
during the implementation of certain portions of the
proposed Plan. The renovation of the Park will require
that some portions be closed so that they can be
renovated and converted to the proposed uses. Thus,
impacts to recreation will be temporary and are
considered to be insignificant. Potential impacts can
be minimized by performing as much of the work on the
Park as possible in non-summer months.
5. Traff ic
Implementation of the proposed Plan may create
increased traf f ic during the cons truction per iod ( s) ,
including heavy truck traffic and earth-moving
equipment, and one or more lanes of traffic may have to
be closed for short periods of time. However, this is
expected to be temporary and is not anticipated to
significantly affect traffic circulation.
F. Mitigation Measures Necessary to Avoid Significant Effects
Since no significant impacts of the project have been identified,
no mitigation is considered necessary. However, the community
might best benefit if the major disruption of the existing
facilities occurred in the fall. This would give the landscaping
the most time to become established prior to peak summer use of
the Park, and would also maximize the chances that the facilities
would be ready in time for the peak use. In addition,
construction and completion prior to the peak months would
minimize traffic impacts.
<'t ... (I
t7 {d
G. Findinqs 2l Insiqnificant Impact
1. The project does not have the potentia 1 to (a)
substantially degrade the quality of the environment;
(b) substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or
wildlife species; (c) cause a fish or wildlife
population to drop below self-sustaining levels; (d)
threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community; (e)
reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal; (f) eliminate impol:;tant
examples of the major periods of California history or
prehistory.
2. The project does not have the potential to achieve
short-term environmental goals to the disadvantage of
long-term environmental goals.
3. The project does not have possible effects which are
individually limited but cumulatively considerable.
4. The environmental effects of the project will not cause
substantial adverse effects on human beings, either
directly or indirectly.
H. Consultation
1. Individuals ~ Orqanizations
City of Chu1a Vista: Barbara Reid, Planning Dept.
E. Haisfal1, Fire Department
Carol Gove, Fire Department
Roger Daoust, Engineering Dept.
Ken Larson, Building & Housing
Department
Hal Rosenberg, Engineering Dept.
Shauna Stokes, Parks & Recreation
Department
Keith Hawkins, Police Dept.
R. Solorzano, Engineering Dept.
Maryann Miller, Planning Dept.
Lee MCEachern, Planning Dept.
Doug Reid, Planning Dept.
2. Documents
Title 19 (Zoning), Chula Vista Municipal ~
General Plan, City 2l Chu1a Vista
City of Chu1a Vista Policy: Threshold/Standards and
Growth Management Oversight Committee, as amended
November 30, 1989
'i{-R
ft-tt
This determination, that the project wi 11 not have any
significant environmental impact, is based on the attached
Initial Study, any comments on the Initial Study, and any
comments on this Negative Declaration. Further information
regarding the environmental review of the project is available
from the Chula Vista Planning Department, 276 Fourth Avenue,
Chula Vista, CA 92010.
ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COORDINATOR
)>'.. 'l..O
17 -12,
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item q
Meeting Date 3/19/91
ITEM TITLE:
Resolution '1.0'7 Approving First Amendment to agreement
between the City of Chula Vista and Community Transit
Services, Inc. (CTS) for HandY trans operation
Director of Public Works~
City Manage'9
(4/5ths Vote: Yes___No-x-)
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
The current three-year agreement between the City of Chul a Vi sta and CTS for
HandYtrans ope rat ion termi nates on June 30, 1991. The agreement contains an
option to extend the agreement on an annual basis for a maximum of two
additional years. This First Amendment contains a one-year extension at a
rate per hour of $31.75, a four percent increase over the current fiscal year,
and an additional 2.5 hours per day, or 8% increase in operating hours. The
maximum cost under this First Amendment for next fiscal year is $279,908, a 12
percent increase over the current fiscal year, which includes the higher rate
per mile and the additional hours.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt resol ut i on approvi ng Fi rst Amendment to
agreement between the City of Chula Vista and CTS for HandYtrans operation.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
The main proposed changes to HandYtrans operations for next fiscal year is to
add 2.5 hours daily, Monday through Friday to be used when necessary to
relieve peak periods of demand, which often occur between 8:30-10:30 a.m. and
2:30-4:30 p.m. These additional hours will give CTS the flexibility to use a
vehicle to provide additional capacity when needed.
The rate per hour negotiated with CTS next fiscal year is $31.75, an increase
of four percent over the current fi sca 1 year. The maximum contract cost
(assuming the use of the maximum allowable hours of 8816) is $279,908.
This First Amendment contains an option to renew the agreement for one
additional and final year, for the period July I, 1992 through June 30, 1993.
FISCAL IMPACT: HandYtrans operation is funded with City of Chula Vista
Transportation Development Act (TDA) Article 4.5 funds. Sufficient Article
4.5 funds will be available next fiscal year for this service.
WPC 1397T
File: DT-007
9-1 J q - ~
RESOLUTION NO. /61 0 ,,,
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING FIRST AMENDMENT TO
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND
COMMUNITY TRANSIT SERVICES, INC. (CTS) FOR
HANDYTRANS OPERATION, AND AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AMENDMENT
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the current three-year agreement between the
City of Chula Vista and CTS for HandY trans operation terminates
on June 30, 1991; and
WHEREAS, the agreement contains an option to extend the
agreement on an annual basis for a maximum of two additional
years; and
WHEREAS, this First Amendment contains a one-year
extension at a rate per hour of $31.75, a four percent increase
over the current fiscal year, and an additional 2.5 hours per
day, or 8% increase in operating hours; and
WHEREAS, the maximum cost under this First Amendment for
next fiscal year is $279,908, a 12 percent increase over the
current fiscal year, which includes the higher rate per mile and
the additional hours.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula Vista does hereby approve the First Amendment
to Agreement between the City of Chula Vista and Community
Transit Services, Inc. (CTS) for HandY trans operation, a copy of
which is on file in the office of the City Clerk.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of
Chula Vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said
Amendment for and on behalf of the City of Chula Vista.
~
A's::rt o,m 1]
:.:;;,. M. Boogoo' city Atto,ooy
Presented by
John P. Lippitt,
Public Works
8635a
Director of
9-3 / 't-6
mE CITY OF CHULA. VISTA PARTY DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
Statement of disclosure of certain ownership interests, payments, or campaign contributions, on all matters
which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council, Planning Commission, and all other
offICial bodies. The following information must be disclosed;
1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the contract, i.e., contractor, subcontractor,
material supplier.
Community Transit Services. Inc. (Contractor)
2. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all
individuals owning more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership interest
in the partnership.
W.R.L.Diangson C. M.Romell
R.E.Glauthier R.J.Wilson
J.L.Pierson
3. If any person identified pursuant to (1) above is non-profit organization or a trust, list the names of any
person serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the
trust.
Not Aoolicable
4.
Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of the City staff, Boards,
Commissions, Committees and Council within the past twelve months? Yes_
No.ll... If yes, please indicate person(s):
5.
Please identify each and every person, includini any agents, employees, consultants or independent
contractors who you have assigned to represent you before the City in this matter.
Lance Walker Robert J.Wilson
Roy E. Glauthier
Wavne Fritz
James L.Pierson
6.
Have you andlor your officers or agents, in the aggregate, contributed more than $1,000 to a
Councilmember in the current or preceding election period? Yes _ No ~ If yes, state w~
Councilmember(s):
~ i. defilled as: ',cny Individtlal. finn. co-partnershlp, joint \ll!ntut'l!. ""oc/at/on, loclal club, fraternal organization,
rorporat/an, utatll. trust, ,..,Ctllwr, SJlndlcate. Ihlll and any other county. city and count..,.. cIty. municipality, dlltrlct or otM political
,ubdlvlllDIJ, Dr 411)' DIIl.,- 8roUP 01' combination acting ar d unJl. Ii
Date: M~r{"h 11 1 qql
(NOT!!: Atlallh addltioJlAl Pill'" as necessary)
Signature 0 ntractor/applicant
Roy E. Glauthier
Virp Prp~i~pntl SprTPtATV
Print or type name of contractor/applieant
1A-lI3\A:DI5CLOSB.'J'XT]
{IovllOd: 11/30190]
'{-r
AMENDMENT #1 TO AGREEMENT BETWEEN
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
AND COMMUNITY TRANSIT SERVICES, INC.
FOR HANDYTRANS OPERATION
~"
.. "
/
4'0
'j/ of H'
, (J l.9.9;~b
" ,
"
THIS AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT, made this day
of , 1991, by and between the City of Chula Vista, hereinafter
called "CITY", and Community Transit Services, Inc., hereinafter called "CTS".
WIT N E SSE T H
WHEREAS, City and CTS previously entered into an agreement for
HandY trans operation on May 17, 1988; and
WHEREAS, the term of that agreement expires on June 3D, 1991; and
WHEREAS, that agreement contains an option to extend agreement for
two additional years, July I, 1991 through June 3D, 1992, and July I, 1992
through June 3D, 1993; and
WHEREAS, both City and CTS wish to extend for FY 1991-92 the term of
said agreement and increase the consideration for services embodied therein.
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereto agree as follows:
1. Change Section 5(c) to read: "Maximum cost not to exceed
$279,908 for the period July I, 1991 to June 3D, 1992, based on a fixed rate
of $31.75 per hour."
2. Change Section 35(a) to read: "The term of this agreement
shall be from July I, 1991 to June 3D, 1992, with an option to renew agreement
for one additional year for the period July I, 1992 through June 3D, 1993."
3. Change Exhibit A, Statement of Work: Section 2b, Vehicle
Utilization, to read: "Contractor shall provide for five (5) lift-equipped
vehicles in service as follows:
I) Monday thru Friday:
Three (3) vehicles x 8.5 hrs. - 25.5 vehicle hours plus
one (1) vehicle x 6.5 hrs - 6.5 vehicle hours for a total
of 32.0 vehicle hours daily
2) Sunday:
Two (2) vehicles x 6 hrs. = 12 vehicle hours (no change)
3)
One vehicle shall be provided by Contractor as spare (no
change) .
1ft iR (C m~ If W IE IID
NOVIS ..
DAV~ IRANSPORTAnON
f-7
4) Annual Hours:
a. Weekday: 256 days x 32 daily hrs . 8192 hrs.
b. Sunday: 52 days x 12 hrs . 624 hrs.
c. Total Hours: 8816
4. All other terms and conditions shall remain in effect as they
are described in the agreement of May 17, 1988.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the parties hereto have caused this Amendment to
be executed on the day and year first written.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
By:
COMMUNITY TRANSIT SER~S, INC.
By: O(~
J mes L. Pierson, President
Da II ~~D
Mayor
Date:
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY
By: ~ls~-~~rneY
Date: U(II../Io
WPC 13611
-2-
v-I
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item 10
REVIEWED BY:
Meeting Date 3/19/91
Resolution I~()~ Establishing an all-way stop at the
intersection of Corral Canyon Road and Country Vistas Lane
Director of Public work~~
City Manager~Z (4/5ths Vote: Yes___No~)
(/ Council Referral #2127
Staff was directed by Council to investigate the need for traffic control at
the intersection of Corral Canyon Road and Country Vistas Lane.
ITEM TITLE:
SUBMITTED BY:
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council establish an all-way stop at the
intersection of Corral Canyon Road and Country Vistas Lane.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: The Safety Commission, at the February
14, 1991 meeting, voted 5-0 in favor of staff's recommendation to establish an
all-way stop at the intersection of Corral Canyon Road and Country Vistas Lane.
DISCUSSION:
The City Traffic Engineer has determined the need to install an all-way stop
at Corral Canyon Road and Country Vi stas Lane. Presently east/west Country
Vistas Lane traffic is controlled by stop signs and north/south Corral Canyon
Road traffic is not controlled by stop signs. The proposed stop signs for
this intersection will establish an all-way stop controlled intersection.
This installation is intended to mitigate a sight restriction problem due to
roadway geometric and topographic features.
The all-way stop recommendation is based on traffic conditions and the City's
all-way stop policy. Application of the policy revealed that the subject
intersection received 22 points out of a possible 50. Normally 30 points
qua 1 ify an intersect i on for an all-way stop install at ion. However, in thi s
case staff feel s an exception should be made because the recent opening of a
church and pre-school have created additional turning conflicts and pedestrian
activity at the subject intersection and the intersection is located on a
curve and at the crest of a hill, resulting in reduced sight distance.
FISCAL IMPACT: $200.
WPC 5484E:CY-016
Attachments: All-Way Stop Evaluation
Area Pl ats (2)
Letter received 9/7/90
Safety Commission Minutes dated 2/14/91 (excerpt) NO'" SeA"''''E~
ftH / If) -2.
RESOLUTION NO.~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ESTABLISHING AN ALL-WAY STOP AT
THE INTERSECTION OF CORRAL CANYON ROAD AND
COUNTRY VISTAS LANE
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, the City Traffic Engineer has determined the
need to install an all-way stop at Corral Canyon Road and Country
Vistas Lane, and
WHEREAS, the proposed stop signs for this intersection
will establish an all-way stop controlled intersection which is
intended to mitigate a sight restriction problem due to roadway
geometric and topographic features, and
WHEREAS, the all-way stop recommendation is based on
traffic conditions and the City's all-way stop pOlicy, and
WHEREAS, the Safety Commission, at the February 14, 1991
meeting, voted 5-0 in favor of staff's recommendation to
establish an all-way stop at the intersection of Corral Canyon
Road and Country Vistas Lane.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula vista does hereby establish an all-way stop at
the intersection of Corral Canyon Road and Country Vistas Lane.
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public works
8645a
":0
Presented by
Clty Attorney
/0
. 3/10 -7
Oc:JO'-t'g
.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA POLICY
ALL-WAY ~IU~ ~UNIRUL
INTERSECTION
PURPOSE:
Corrq { C'j>1Y0t1 RJ oJ- CO'-lllfry Vts!c;.s LA!
I
Date: /0/5/'10
I f
Total Poi nts 2- Z--
A fully justified, properly installed four-way stop can effectively assign right of way,
reduce vehicle delay and decrease accidents. Generally, a four-way stop is reserved for
use at the intersection of two through highways, and only as an interim traffic control
measure prior to signalization.
GENERAL:
The posting of an intersection for four-way stop control should be based on factual
data. Warrants to be considered include:
1. Through street conditions.
2. Accident records.
3. Traffic and pedestrian volumes.
4. Volume splits.
5. Unusual conditions such as proximity of schools, fire stations, vision obscurement,
etc.
Points are assigned to each of these warrants. The total possible points is 50. The
installation of four-way stop control is justified with a total of 30 points.
THROUGH STREET WARRANT:
One of the approaching streets to the intersection must be a through highway before the
intersection can be considered for four-way stop control. A through highway shall
extend at least one mile in both directions from the intersection under consideration
and shall meet condi ti ons set forth on Page 8, Secti on 2f of the Hi ghway Capaci ty
Manual, 1965.
A. If only one of the intersecting streets is a through highway
B. If both streets are through highways
1-3 Poi nts
3-5 Points
SCORE: :3 Points
Maximum 5 Points
ACCIDENT WARRANT:
Two poi nts are assi gned for each acci dent suscepti bl e to correcti on by four-way stop
control during one full year prior to the investigation.
Total number of accidents correctible by four-way stop:
7f/n +D "/30/90
Maximum 14 Points
2-
SCORE: t Poi nts
UNUSUAL CONDITION WARRANT:
Where unusual conditions exist at the intersection such as a school, fire station,
playground, vision obscurement, etc., points are assigned on the basis of engineering
judgment. Unusual conditions shall be considered only if within 500 feet of the
i ntersecti on:
Maximum 10 Points
/o..r
SCORE: /0 Poi nts
.
-2-
VOLUME WARRANT:
A. Total entering vehicle volume must equal 2,000 vehicles for four highest hours
in average day.
B. Minimum side street vehicular and pedestrian volume must equal 600 vehicles
during same four hour period.
Points shall be assigned in accordance with the following tables:
ALL APPROACHES
MINOR STREET PEDESTRIAN &
VEHICLE VOLUME (BOTH APPROACHES)
o - 1400
1401 - 1700
1701 - 2000
~~O~ - 2300
(2301 --2bUU
o - 29UO
2901 - 3200
3201 - 3500
3501 - 3800
3801 - 4100
4101 - 4400
4401 - 4700
4701 - 5000
5001 - 5300
5301 - 5600
5601 - 5900
Over 5900
:< 'fq 3
o
1
2
3
U
5
6
7
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
o
Highest Four Hour Volume
C ~~ - (,00 6-<7/
b - 800
801 - 1200
1201 - 1400
1401 - 1600
1601 - Over
Points
0)
1
2
3
4
5
Highest Four Hour Volume
Points
Maximum 13 Points
SCORE ~points
VOLUME SPLIT WARRANT:
Four-way stops operate best where the minor approach volume and the major approach
volume are nearly equal. Points shall be assigned in accordance with the following
tab 1 e:
24-Hour Minor St. Volumes
24-Hour Major St. Volumes %
95+
as - 94
75 - 84
65 - 74
55 - 64
45 - 54
35 - 44
(25:34)
o - 24
/5?O
S- Z. '10
;;0 30Yo
Points
Maximum 8 Points
/'() - "
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
CD
o
SCORE:~ Points
, .
-3-
ALL-WAY STOP SUMMARY
INTERSECTION: Corr",1 Coo,.,to.. /2oer.d /Co(.""1,! VI'si..!. L~
DATE INVESTIGATION COI~PLETED: IO~-jc;O
TOTAL SCORE: 2. 2-- points out/:J a possible total 50. Minimum score for four-way
stop control is ::SU po, nts. ',~ N
~ .1SMPH
.,-- 5fet:D t
REMARKS: I wo- w"-Y Co I L-IM 'T
tvr" poc~e- t-r<>1l 5/6111
C-C<->'\ {871,
,e 'M
~Il
COV>1 .ty
V, I S L<>-.IL
151'" VI.
e}
\)
CorfUS
Cris+;
cl.vrc.~
RECOMMENDATIONS:
~JPC 3287E
PW-E-23
t
'1
l""7fZ.H;){I':: >llolV
?feeT?
Nt9
'fIO~
rC
~"&-
\r:>~(t..~IP of t1'f
vJP- 1u~7 'f 1,..1"
1 $1 'f(l.~e (1-~
~ I S rJ'lJ/<
s,1'1<
v"~ ~
1-e9 e~
,/ 5 pS~f\''P tJ
\%\~ p.,,J D
~ $I""
\~ '--- 5'f(l.e;~
___ _____ (...\c.t-I"\
.5r~(l-D
/0...7
.........
..-.v.-'....
..~....:...~..
., .... ... .~."
':. .::.~.~...::..
.:.....~....
..-:~..... ...
I" .....-....
':...~...~~
...- ............ .~....
., ................~..
...... .....'""':'.....
.. ......... ......
........~......'
.:. -;:. .-~;..
.;_.....:~:I...~
....:.~.-c..::,.
.o'. ...:;::... ."
.......
I
~
l
SCALE: 1"02000'
-
,
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.'
. .
i.
,.
,
.
,
.
.
.
.
,
.
.
,
.
,
,
.
"
,
,
,
.
,
.
......-..
h-~\ ~
Oil A.... liT
-
----
H.N.
T . T IL iE
DA:r!:
8/3/1988
/4..f
AREA
PLAT
"
o
c:
\ GO
o.
'J\~,,'ir>-
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\ \
\
\ .
\
~
\
\
\
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
/
"4....
,.0....
1 CHERRY HILLS LN
2 HICKORY TERR
3 RED HILL LN
4 OAK VIEW TERF1
5 PEPPERWOOD CT
/
/
/
Oll",w~ By J
-__ H.N.
--------
DAr(
6/24/88
TIT L E
/0-'
AREA
PLAT
.,~
'.
(
, .
c
,.-
.
'I'. I.
,
SEP
119!U~~
BONIT A HIGHLANDS
HOMEOWNERS' ASSOCIATION
P.O. BOX 458
BONIT A, CA 92002-0458
CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL
276 4TIi AVENUE
CHULA VISTA,CA92010
DEAR COUNCILMEMBERS:
First,let us thank you for the excellent n:sponse we n:ceived to our letter about
possible bus speeding on Corral Canyon in our neighboIhood. Mr. Gustafson wrote us a very
kind letter and the follow-up has been mon: than satislilctory.
We have another ClOncem about which we seek your assis tance: traffic ClOntrol at the
intersection of Corral Canyon and Country Vistas. As you know, a church is being built on
the southwest comer and we tear anin=ase in trafficproblcms on Corral Canyon.
Then: have been. n:centIy, several automobile incidents on Corral Canyon. And, mon:
traffic will n:sult in more incidents. There is nothing to be done about the volume of traffic. it
comes with the territory, but we ask that you help us control it by placing some sort of traffic
control at the intersection.
A stop sign or signal..your traffic engineer knows best-- to control north.south traffic
at the intersection is what we ask. In addition to the churd1, then: an: two other reasons for
the control: 1) that is a lilvoritc- crossing place for children on their way to Bonita Vista Junior
or Senior; and, 2) it is on a aJrVe which makes it difliallt to see northbound traffic if one is
crossing on Country Vistas.
We an: asking the County to provide additional traffic control1ilrthcr north on Corral
Canyon. The traffic situat! ., on Corral Canyon is intolerable and we would appn:ci.ate
anything you can do help us. One oCour Board Members, Ms. Janet Raya has volunteered to
be your contact and she can be reached at 421.8828.
ItJ -/0
Sincere~
~~ '
Rick: P~ps
Board Secretary
Bonita High1ands Homeowners' Association
/ - ,,~)
, . I
./
~AJRIT1EN . COMlotUNICA liONS
~ \J .. -. ~. .. ~,J.I. /1.,' (
Safety Commi"~\on Meeting
February 14, 1991
Minutes
10. Establishing a Trial Traffic Regulation: All-way Stop at Corral Canyon Road and
Country Vistas Lane
STAFF REPORT
Mr. Rivera stated that staff has decided to present this item to the City Council in the
form of a report. We want the City Council to establish an all-way stop at this
intersection. Presently, there are two stop signs controlling Country Vistas Lane and we
are proposing the addition of two more stop signs to stop Corral Canyon Road on both
approaches.
Mr. Rosenberg, in response to Commissioner Koester's question as to whether this had
come before the Commission before, stated the item carne before the Commission several
years previously and that it has been a continuing request and that it was denied on one
and perhaps two occasions based on traffic warrant study. However, we think traffic
conditions are such with the development that has taken place and the opening of the
church, and the recognition of the accident potential at this intersection resulting from
some limited visibility, and while it is a borderline situation, we feel in the interest of
motoring safety and community safety that an all-way stop would be appropriate.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Stanley Waid, 5617 Galloping Way, Bonita 91902.
I am the traffic representative from the Sweetwater Valley Civic Association and I am
also the treasurer of Bonita Highlands Homeowners Association. I thank you Mr.
Commissioner (Commissioner Matacia stating that he lives in the area and while he does
not wish to see more stop signs, this area needs a stop sign). I would ask staff that, in
addition to the stop sign, they look at left turn pockets.
Mr. Rivera noted that staff will be looking into Mr. Waid's request. Corral Canyon
Road will be chip sealed this summer and at that time we will take a look at changing
the striping.
STAFF ACTION ITEM
Look at changing the striping at this intersection when the chip seal is being done this summer.
MOTION
'Ihat staff not put a trial there, but install the all-way stop signs.
MSUC [Thomas/Matacia] 5-0.
9. Report on Palomar Street/Orange Avenue
STAFF REPORT
Mr. Rivera stated that staff investigated the concerns of Mr. and Mrs. Locicero and are
therefore we are recommending that no further action be taken on Orange Avenue south
of Palomar Street.
-13-
IfJ -II
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
ITEM
II
MEETING DATE: March 19. 1991
ITEM TITLE:
Report to Council regarding closing or reducing the
public service hours at the Library at 365 F street
in order to relabel the collection with bar code
identification labels prior to going online with the
INLEX library automation system.
Two alternate resolutions are outlined for Council
, consideration.
A. Resolution ~ approving the Library at 365
F street be closed during morning hours, 10:00 am
to 12:00 noon, for three weeks beginning April 1
through April 19, 1991, in order to bar code the
collection.
B. Resolution I~Oqq~ approving the library at 365
F street be closed for eight (8) days, (April 1-8,
1991) in order to bar code the collection.
SUBMITTED BY:
Library Director~
City Manage~
(4/5 Vote: Yes____
No....lLl
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND
The Library I s request for a new automated library system was
approved in the FY 1989-90 Capital Improvement Program. INLEX
Inc., a California-based library automation vendor, is the primary
vendor. INLEX offers a package which includes a circulation
system, an online public access catalog and an acquisitions module.
The Council action of August 28, 1990 is attached to provide more
background about the acquisition of the new automated library
system.
Staff has made significant progress toward implementing the INLEX
system. The hardware has been purchased, the data has been
converted, the system is installed and staff is currently training
on the system. A target date in April is set for bringing the
circulation portion of the system online. However, before going
online with the INLEX system, the library'S collection must be
relabelled with bar code labels to replace the OCR (optical
character recognition) labels currently used.
When the library went online with the ALIS computer system in 1979,
OCR labelling was the more advanced technology and offered greater
11-
Item~, Page 2
Meeting Date: March 19. 1991
advantages for use in libraries. However, over the last ten years
bar coding has made greater strides. Bar coding is commonly used
throughout the business world for inventory control of merchandise;
it has become the standard in libraries as well. While bar coding
has become the leading, growing technology, OCR technology has
become stagnant. As equipment for scanning becomes more
sophisticated, OCR technology is not being accommodated.
Conversion to the INLEX system has offered an opportunity for the
Library to move from the outdated OCR technology to bar code labels
in both patron identification as well as item identification.
RECOMMENDATION That Council adopt the resolution approving the
Library at 365 F street be closed during morning
hours, 10:00 am to 12:00 noon, for three weeks
beginning April 1 through April 19, 1991, in order
to bar code the collection.
LIBRARY BOARD RECOMMENDATION
The Library Board, at a special meeting on March 13, 1991,
recommended that the Library close completely for one week and one
day, April 1-8, 1991, to bar code the entire collection.
The Library Trustees also recommended that should the City Council
not find the their recommendation satisfactory, the Council then
consider the Trustee's second choice of closing the library from
10 am to 12 noon beginning April 1st for three weeks, Monday
through Friday during the bar coding process.
DISCUSSION
Staff and volunteers are currently involved in a patron re-
registration campaign for the INLEX system uSlng bar code
identification in an effort to avoid long lines at the registration
and check out desks when the IN LEX system is brought online in
April.
Relabelling the collection with "smart" bar code labels involves
matching each of the 226,000 items in the collection with its
specific computer-generated bar code label. The "smart" bar code
label is called such because the label bears the newly assigned bar
code number, the branch, location within the branch, call number,
author and title for each item.
Based on staff's past experiences with similar proj ects, the
report;:ed experiences of other libraries, and staff's current
experlence relabelling the branch library collections, the
Library's Bar Code Task Force estimates that labels can be affixed
If. ')..
,s,
Item ~, Page 3
Meeting Date: March 19. 1991
at an average rate of two per minute, using teams which pair staff
members or pair a staff member with a volunteer. At that rate, the
library collection at 365 F street, composed of 189,000 items,
would take 3,150 person hours to relabel. However, given that 30%
of the collection is out on loan at any time, and 13,300 are
reference items which do not have to be bar coded immediately for
circulation, this figure is reduced to approximately 2000 person
hours required to relabel the circulating collection on the shelves
at the library at 365 F street. The Castle Park and Woodlawn Park
Libraries' collections are being bar coded now, during regular
branch library closed hours.
staff has discussed three alternatives for accomplishing the bar
code relabelling of the collection.
I. Close the Library for Eight Days, (April 1-8, 1991)
If the Library at 365 F street were completely closed to the
pUblic, and staff time were to be devoted solely to the
relabelling project, using current staffing levels along with
140 volunteer hours from Monday through the following Monday,
the relabelling project could be completed in eight days.
The 30% of the collection that is checked out would have to
be handled separately and will take considerable time and
effort to relabel in any case. The non-circulating reference
collection would also be handled separately. This is the most
efficient way to label the books and is the standard
operational procedure in both public and university libraries.
The Escondido Public Library was closed for one month to bar
code. The Library Board feels it is in the public interest
to do the job efficiently and quickly and return to normal
library services as soon as possible.
The major disadvantage would be the loss of 75 hours of public
service. Because the Castle Park and Woodlawn Park Libraries
have been bar coded and would retain their present 54.5 hours
of public service during the time that the Library at 365 F
street is closed, there would be hours of public service
available albeit with smaller collections in less convenient
locations. Southwestern College Library has offered to draft
a flyer inviting public library patrons to use its services
giving them Southwestern college Library's hours, and
directions to the college and parking lots.
II. Hire Temporary Workers to Do the Bar coding During Library
open Hours
The Council may wish to allocate funds
workers to relabel the collection for a
$17,160 to $18,000. A cost estimate,
to hire temporary
cost ranging from
obtained through
/1-3
\'\
Meeting
Item ~, Page 4
Date: March 19. 1991
preliminary quotes from agencies which supply temporary
personnel, is based on 2,200 hours of temporary worker
service. The 2,200 hour estimate reflects an increase over
the amount of time it would take for library staff and
volunteers to do the bar cOding. First, inexperienced workers
will take longer to label the collection and secondly, the
process will be slower during library open hours because
patrons and temporary workers will have access to the aisles
and books at the same time.
This inventory-type process is noisy and space consuming, and
would greatly inconvenience and confuse library patrons who
want access to the aisles where the relabelling is taking
place. Library staff has also raised the issue of managing
a work force of up to 30 temporary workers while the library
is open. While maintaining open hours is positive, staff
perceive this alternative to have some negative possibilities
for public service as well. The City'S Personnel Department
recommends hiring through a temporary agency because of issues
of recruitment, liability to the city and payroll processing.
The primary advantage is maintaining the current public
service hours. The disadvantage is the public would be
inconvenienced and the cost, $17,160 to $18,600 would have to
be appropriated from the unexpended balance of the General
Fund. This alternative is not recommended by either the staff
or the Library Board of Trustees.
III. Close the Library from 10:00 to Noon, Monday throuqh Friday
for Three Weeks (April 1-19, 1991)
The third alternative recommended by staff is to begin bar
coding now in the early morning hours when the library is
normally closed, and to accelerate the bar cOding project
during a three week period when the library would be closed
from 10: 00 to 12: 00 noon every morning, beginning April 1
through April 19. This compromises efficiency in the interest
of public service.
The advantage is the Library would still be open the majority
of its normal hours Monday through Friday. Weekend hours
would remain the same. Library volunteer hours would still
be used to help complete the project.
The disadvantage, in addition to the loss of 30 public service
hours in the morning during the three weeks, is this is not
an easy alternative for staff. It makes the process much
longer and puts staff three weeks behind in their normal tasks
as well as making them change duties in the midst of their
11-'1
Meeting
Item~, Page 5
Date: March 19. 1991
work day.
especially,
visits, and
The public service hours lost affect children
with the loss of school class visits, pre-school
parent-child story hours for three weeks.
This alternative, however, appears to be the best all-around
compromise for keeping the library open and maintaining public
service and getting the bar coding done in a reasonable amount
of time.
FISCAL IMPACT
If the Council prefers allocating funds to hire temporary workers
for 2,200 hours to do the bar code and relabelling while the
library is open, the fiscal impact would be a cost of $17,160 to
$18,600, depending on the temporary agency selected.
jj-S- ///-6
RESOLUTION NO. J(,Oq~)
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING THE LIBRARY
AT 365 F STREET BE CLOSED DURING MORNING
HOURS, 10:00 A.M. TO 12 NOON, FOR THREE WEEKS
BEGINNING APRIL 1 THROUGH APRIL 19, 1991, IN
ORDER TO BAR CODE THE COLLECTION
WHEREAS,
library system was
Program; and,
the Library's request for a new automated
approved in the FY 1989-90 Capital Improvement
WHEREAS, on August 28, 1990, Council approved the award
of contracts for software licensing, purchase or hardware and
customer support and service agreements to Hewlett Packard and
INLEX; and,
WHEREAS, one of the major components of the system
implementation is conversion from optical character recognition
(OCR) labels as the book and item identification and inventory
control method to using bar code labels; and
WHEREAS, the Library Board, at
13, 1991, recommended that the Library
week and one day, April 1-8, 1991,
collection; and,
a special meeting on March
close completely for one
to bar code the entire
WHEREAS, the Library Trustees also recommended that
should the City Council not find their recommendation satisfactory,
the Council then consider the Trustee's second choice of closing
the library from 10 a.m. to 12 noon beginning April 1st for three
weeks, Monday through Friday during the bar coding process.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA does hereby approve the Library at 365 F Street be closed
during morning hours, 10:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon for three weeks
beginning April 1 through April 19, 1991 in order to bar code the
collection.
Presented by: Approved as to form by:
Rosemary Lane, Library
Director
reso\PTclose
10/11- If
RESOLUTION NO. Iboq" lB)
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA APPROVING CLOSURE OF
THE LIBRARY AT 365 F STREET FOR EIGHT (8) DAYS
FROM APRIL 1, 1991 THROUGH APRIL 8, 1991 IN
ORDER TO BAR CODE THE COLLECTION
The City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby
resolve as follows:
WHEREAS,
library system was
Program; and,
the Library's request for a new automated
approved in the FY 1989-90 Capital Improvement
WHEREAS, on August 28, 1990, Council approved the award
of contracts for software licensing, purchase of hardware and
customer support and service agreements to Hewlett Packard and
INLEX, Inc.; and,
WHEREAS, one of the major components of the system
implementation is conversion from optical character recognition
(OCR) labels as the book and item identification and inventory
control method to using bar code labels; and,
WHEREAS, based on staff's experiences with similar
projects, it is estimated it is estimated that the Library would
need to be closed to the public for eight days in order to relabel
the collection; and
WHEREAS, the Library Board, at a special meeting on March
13, 1991, recommended that the Library close completely for one
week and one day, April 1-8, 1991, to bar code the entire
collection.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA DOES approve closure of the Library at 365 F Street for eight
(8) days from April 1, 1991 through April 8, 1991 in order to bar
code the collection.
Presented by:
Approved as to form by:
Rosemary Lane, Library
Director
Bru~~B~~~-if:. Y'Sj~1
City Attorney
inlexlib.wp
((-1
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item 12-
ITEM TITLE:
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
Meeting Date 3/19/91
Report on Chul.a Vi sta Tran:.~ t YVT) Study
Director of Public Works {f'\/
City Manager~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes___No-x-)
At its meeting on March 5, 1991, Council considered proposed CVT service
changes for next fiscal year as shown on the attached map (Exhibit 1) and
service and operating data (Exhibit 2). Council directed staff to reconsider
two issues in the proposed plan: options to accommodate a CVT user, Mrs.
Carolyn Butler, who would be adversely affected by the proposed plan; and
further evaluate and discuss with the Downtown Business Association the
proposal to eliminate Route 702 service to F Street between Second and Fourth
Avenues. In addition, Council asked for an estimated cost comparison between
the current fi sea 1 year and the proposed servi ce changes for next fi sea 1
year. The total estimated net operating cost this fiscal year (including fare
revenue) is $960,000, and $1.8 million next fiscal year.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council:
1. Accept this report.
2. Recommend to SCOOT Board that Phase 1 CVT improvements as indicated on
Exhibits 1 and 2 be implemented in FY 1991-92.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: The CVT study was presented to the SCOOT
El derly and Handi capped Advi sory Commi ttee at its meet i ng on February 26,
1991. The Committee concurred with the study in general and with Phase 1
recommendations.
DISCUSSION:
Service to Ouintard and First
The proposed CVT plan eliminates current 701 service to Quintard/First. Mrs.
Carolyn Butler, who currently uses CVT and boards Route 701 at Quintard/First
has indicated that it would be difficult for her to walk to and from the new
stop at Hilltop/Quintard which will be approximately 0.4 mile (1-1/2 blocks)
from her home. Staff cons idered a number of options to accommodate Mrs.
Butler, including use of Handvtrans, taxi, and possibly diverting Route 701
only during certain times of the day. Mrs. Butler rides CVT frequently
throughout the day and has indicated that using HandYtrans, which requires
advance reservation, would limit her mobility. In addition, the HandYtrans
fare is $1.25 per trip compared with the CVT Senior Disabled fare of SOt per
trip (or a monthly SIO pass); therefore, the use of HandYtrans would add to
Mrs. Butl er' s transportation costs. Counci 1 suggested that perhaps operat i ng
cost saved by not diverting Route 701 could be used to subsidize Mrs. Butler's
J~-'
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date 3/19/91
trip either on HandYtrans or a taxi. The Transportation Development Act (TDA)
prohibits the use of TDA funds to subsidize a specific individual's
transportation; furthermore, since CVT is funded by TDA Article 4.0 funds, and
Handvtrans by TDA Article 4.5 funds, CVT 4.0 funds could not be used to
support HandY trans operations unless HandY trans service were expanded to serve
the general public and not limited to seniors and disabled persons.
After considering a number of ways to accommodate Mrs. Butler, staff concluded
that using CVT, as she does now, would best meet her needs. Staff considered
two options using CVT: to retain the 701 diversion to Second Avenue/Quintard;
and to re-route 702 to Quintard between Second Avenue and Hilltop. These two
options are shown on Exhibit 3, and an operation analysis of these options is
shown on Exhibit 4. The diversion of Route 701 has a number of disadvantages
to CVT operation. As indicated on Exhibit 4, the diversion would result in
decreased frequency from a regul ar 30 mi nute headway to 40 to 45 mi nutes (i t
woul d be diffi cult to ma i nta in a regul ar or clock headway), the number of
daily trips would be reduced from 34 to 26, and the estimated net cost
increase is $35,000. Diverting the route for selected trips was not
considered a good solution either for Mrs. Butler or CVT operations; Mrs.
Butler uses CVT throughout the day, and the 701 schedule and service frequency
would be disrupted. Staff then evaluated an option to divert Route 702 from
Palomar to Quintard between Second Avenue and Hilltop. This diversion has a
number of advantages compared to the 701 diversion: the diversion is 1/2 mile
per trip compared with 1-1/2 mile per trip on 701, resulting in a lower net
cost ($24,000 instead of $35,000); it is a shorter, out-of-direction travel
for through passengers; and the 35 minute frequency on Route 702 can be
maintained with the Quintard diversion. Mrs. Butler will be able to board
Route 702 at her current bus stop and she can transfer to other routes as she
currently does now from Route 701. Staff di scussed thi s option wi th Mrs.
Butler and she found it acceptable.
In summary, it is staff's opinion that the proposed route structure best meets
the object i ves of the CVT Plan; however, di vert i ng Route 702 to Qui ntard
between Second Avenue and Hilltop wi 11 have mi nimum impact on the proposed
route structure and will respond to Mrs. Butler's concern.
Route 702 Service to F Street Between Second and Fourth Avenue
Staff is proposing the el imination of Route 702 service to F Street between
Second and Fourth Avenue, and the el imination of Route 702A service to D
Street and Broadway. The Transit Coordinator will discuss this proposal with
the Downtown Business Association at its meeting on March 19, 1991, and will
report to Council orally on the outcome of this meeting.
The change to Route 702 should be considered in relation to the new and
expanded service to be provided on Route 701 (please refer to Exhibit 3).
Under the proposed plan, Route 701 will operate 7 days a week on weekdays from
approximately 5:30 a.m. to 11:30 p.m. on a 30-minute headway. Currently, both
Routes 701 and 702 serve the area on F Street between Second and Fourth Avenue
on an irregular headway of approximately 45 minutes for each route. Under the
I:J..~
Page 3, Item
Meeting Date 3/19/91
present service, 4 buses serve this area on both Routes 701 and 702, and under
the proposal 3 701 buses wi 11 be servi ng thi s area. However, under the
current operation, because of the varying headways, the F Street area receives
irregular service from both these routes. For example, there are times during
the day when there is a 5-minute or less spread between Routes 701 and 702 and
periods when there is 28 minutes between 701 and 702 buses. Under the
proposed operation, Route 701 buses will serve this area on a regular 30
minute frequency. In addition to service frequency, current ridership data
indicates almost twice the ridership (boardings and alightings) in the F
Street area on Route 701 compared wi th 702. Fi na lly, for those Route 702
passengers destined for the central business area near F Street, there are
transfer opportunities from Route 702 to Route 701 on Palomar, Hilltop between
J and L Streets, at Fourth and H Streets wi th both Routes 706/706A and 701,
and another option is to transfer to the San Diego Trolley at Palomar Station
and then to Routes 701 or 706/706A at the H Street Station.
Exhi bit 4 shows ope rat i ng stat i st i cs for Route 702 servi ce to F Street, and
service to F Street and to Quintard. The diversion to F Street only would
result in an estimated net cost of about $28,500 next year and would decrease
the operating frequency from 35 to 40 mi nutes. The servi ce to F Street and
Quintard would result in an operating frequency of 40 minutes and an estimated
net cost of $46,500.
In summary, staff recommends the proposed Route 702 which eliminates the
diversion to F Street for the following reasons:
The restructuring of Route 701 enhances access to the downtown area with
more frequent 701 servi ce, expanded 701 servi ce to a greater area of
Chul a Vi sta, and by creat i ng better transfer opportuni ties from other
routes to 701.
Current ridership data on Routes 701 and 702 indicate that proposed Route
701 service should adequately serve the downtown area.
FISCAL IMPACT: Sufficient TDA 4.0 funds will be available to implement
proposed Phase I CVT service in FY 1991-92. Based on current preliminary cost
estimates next fiscal year, CVT operations would account for an estimated $1.8
million in TDA 4.0 funds, leaving a balance of $1 million next fiscal year.
This amount, added to prior years' unallocated funds, will result in a City of
Chula Vista TDA 4.0 estimated fund balance of $4.5 million for future
operations and capital expenditures.
Fil e: DS-016
WPC 1403T
12-)
ITEM NUMBER 13
MUNICIPAL CODE SECTION 2.04.020 REQUIRES THAT THE CITY
COUNCIL MEETING THE WEEK PRIOR TO EASTER BE CANCELED,
THEREFORE STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT COUNCIL CONTINUE THE
PUBLIC HEARING SET FOR MARCH 26, 1991 TO THE APRIL 2,
1991 MEETING.
/3- ,
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item~
ITEM TITLE:
Meeting Date 3/19/91
Public Hearing: Adjusting greens fees at Chula Vista Golf
Course
Resolution I~IOO Approving new greens fee rates at Chula
Vista Golf Course
Director of Parks and Recreation~
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
City Managetf
(4/5ths Vote: Yes___No-X-)
American Golf Corporation has submitted a request for a greens fee adjustment
for the Chula Vi sta Golf Course as provided in the 1 ease agreement wi th the
City. the effective date of increase, if approved, would be May 1, 1991.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council accept the report and approve the department's
adjusted fee recommendations.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: At the January 17, 1991 meeting, the
Commission deferred a decision on the proposed greens fee adjustment by
American Golf for the Chula Vista Municipal Golf Course and requested staff to
study the possibility of a multi-tier greens fee system similar to the City of
San Diego, address the senior citizen rate proposal s and finally report on a
monthly pass system (Attachment A). I1INvr~ "'l'r St!A,.JI..J~O
At the February 21, 1991 meeting, the Commission took the following action,
approved (4-2) the Department's greens fee recommendations; voted (3-3) to not
implement a three-tier greens fee system; voted (4-2) to not eliminate the $40
monthly pass plus $I per round senior citizen pass; voted (4-0-2) to not
implement a monthly pass system (Attachment B).
DISCUSSION:
American Golf Corporation has requested a greens fee adjustment for the Chula
Vista Municipal Golf Course. Attachments C, D, and E include a letter from
Ameri can Golf, the proposed rate increases, the department's recommendation,
and a greens fee survey of comparable golf courses, respectively. The last
rate adjustment was approved by Council on January 9, 1990 after the Parks and
Recreation Commission endorsed American Golf's request at their December 14,
1989 meeting.
Si nce the 1 ast rate adjustment Ameri can Golf has cont i nued to make major
capital improvements to the golf course. In 1990-91, two greens were
reconstructed at $56,000, a domestic irrigation system ($20,000) was installed
to provide better quality water with less salinity content to greens; annual
grading and re-seeding of channel improvements ($22,000) and planting of new
trees throughout the course ($6,000).
1'1 ...,
Page 2, Item /V
Meeting Date 3/19/91
American Golf is committed to continue major capital expenditure to improve
the quality and conditions of the golf course. In 1991, one green will be
rebuilt, a new irrigation well will be drilled, and finally, sixty (60) new
golf carts will be introduced.
Staff analyzed the proposed rates and the department recommendation varies
sl ight1y from American Golf's proposal (Attachment D). The Department used
the San Diego Consumer Price Index increase of 6% for the preceding 12 months
and the re1 at i onshi p between the weekend and weekday greens fee rates to
establish the Department's recommendation. The Department felt this increase
enables the lessee to keep pace with the inflationary cost associated with the
golf course operations. The other difference involves one of the two senior
res idents di scount programs offered. The fi rst program, approximately 120
seniors purchased a $10 yearly pass which entitles them to 50% discount on
posted greens fees, Monday through Friday. The second program, approximately
35-40 seniors purchased a $40 monthly pass entit1 ing them to play Monday
through Friday, and play $1.00 per round. American Golf's proposal would
raise the per round fee to $2.00.
The Department recommends the elimination of the $40 monthly program to
simplify the senior-discount program. The remaining program will offer
seniors a good discount that is comparable to other senior discount programs
in the City.
At the January 17, 1991 meeting, the Parks and Recreation Commission deferred
a decision on the proposed greens fee adjustment by American Golf for the
Chu1a Vista Municipal Golf course and requested staff to study the possibility
of a multi-tier greens fee system similar to the City of San Diego and address
the concerns expressed by golfers at that meeting. A report was presented to
the Commi ss ion at thei r February 21, 1991 meeting that di scussed the above
concerns (Attachment G).
FISCAL IMPACT: In 1990, the number of rounds at Chula Vista increased from
101,000 to 103,000 over the 1989 amounts. The increase generated an
additional $30,000 revenue for the City. With the new rates, and if the
number of rounds remain the same, the City will realize approximately $27,485
increase (exhibit "0") in revenue.
WPC 1616R
IY-~
RESOLUTION NO.
16100
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CIlULA
VISTA ESTABLISHING GREENS FEES FOR THE CIlULA VISTA
MUNICIPAL GOLF COURSE
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby resolve as
follows:
WHEREAS, the City Council has previously established greens fees for
the operation of the Chula Vista Municipal Golf Course, and
WHEREAS, the operator of the Chula vista Municipal Golf Course has
requested an increase in the greens fees pursuant to the terms of the contract
between the City and the operator.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of
Chula Vista that the following greens fees and monthly tickets are established
for the Chula vista Municipal Golf Course:
STANDARD GREENS FEES
Applicable Days/Times/Months
Greens Fees
Charges
Number of
Holes
18
18
18
18
Monday through Friday (excluding legal holidays)
$13 . 00
17 .00
saturdays, sundays and legal holidays
9
Monday through Friday (excluding legal holidays)
Monday through Friday/twilight
8.00*
9
9
Monday through Friday/super twilight
9.00
7.00
Saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays
10.00*
saturdays, Sundays and legal holidays/twilight
11.00
saturdays, Sundays and legal hOliday/super twilight
8.00
Resident Senior with Monthly Pass
1.00
Resident Senior with yearly discount card ($10.00)
(Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays)
6.50
9
Resident Senior (Monday through Friday, excluding
legal holidays)
4.00*
*9-Hole play would continue to be scheduled in the early
morning on the back nine only. Once the front nine golfers
are finished, 9-hole play will be limited after 12:00 noon.
-1-
11.. J
LADIES' DAY GREENS FEES
18
Tuesdays only; except when a legal holiday falls on
a Tuesday
13.00
JUNIOR MONTHLY TICKET
The cost of a junior monthly ticket is hereby established as $25.00. Said
monthly ticket shall entitle a junior (defined as non-college students who
have not reached their eighteenth birthday or completed their senior year of
high school) to play a maximum of 18 holes per day after the hour of 2: 00
p.m., subject to any rules, regulations or restrictions imposed by the
management of the Chula Vista Municipal Golf Course.
RESIDENT SENIOR DISCOUNT CARD
The resident senior discount card is established as an annual charge of
$10.00. An age eligibility requirement must be met and the following
restrictions are imposed to qualify for this special discount.
1. Chula Vista residency. Said residency shall be verified by
driver's license or voter registration card.
2. The individual must be at least 62 years of age.
3. Play is restricted to weekdays only, holidays excluded.
RESIDENT SENIOR MONTHLY PASS
Resident senior monthly pass is to be sold at an annual charge of $40.00 and
then only to Chula Vista residents 62 years of age or older. Permitted play
under the monthly pass is to be restricted to weekdays only, holidays excluded.
RAIN CHECKS
No rain checks will be given for any fee category.
LEGAL HOLIDAYS DEFINED
For the purpose of this resolution, legal holidays are defined as follows:
January 1, New Year's Day; February 12, Lincoln's Birthday; third Monday in
February, Washington's Birthday; last Monday in May, Memorial Day; July 4,
Independence Day; first Monday in September, Labor Day; september 9, Admission
Day; second Monday in October, Columbus Day; November 11, Veterans' Day;
fourth Thursday in November, Thanksgiving; fourth Friday in November; and
December 25, Christmas.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Resolution No. 15452 of the City Council of
the City of Chula Vista is hereby rescinded effective May 1, 1991.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that these fees shall be in full force and
effect on May 1, 1991.
-2- 11/_ ~
Presented by
Jess Valenzuela
Director of Parks & Recreation
l630a
-3-
Approved as to form by
Bruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
11J-5/,'I-U..
Attachment A
Minutes of a
Regular Meeting of the
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
DRAFT
Thursday 6:00 p.m.
January 17, 1991
**REVlSED**
Parks and Recreation
Conference Room
*******************
CALL MEETING TO ORDER
ROLL CALL
MEMBERS PRESENT:
MEMBER LATE:
MEMBER ABSENT:
commissioners Lind, Roland, willett
Chair Sandoval-Fernandez (6:15)
Commissioner Hall
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Motion to approve the minutes of the meeting of December 13, 1990 as
distributed.
MSC LIND/ROLAND 3-0 (Sandoval-Fernandez out)
2 . PUBLIC HEARINGS OR REMARKS
NONE
3. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
Criteria for Membership in EastLake Golf Course
Item continued until February meeting.
4. NEW BUSINESS
a. Golf Course Fee Increase
Director Valenzuela gave a brief overview of American Gol~'s proposal
for a fee increase. He stated that staff's rev~ew of the
request revealed that the proposed fees were below one third of all golf
courses in San Diego County. This proposal has also been endorsed by
the Men's Club. Johnny Gonzales and Bert Geisendorf were present to
represent American Golf.
The Commissioners discussed the potential Stage IV water alert and the
impact that this would have on the Golf Course. Mr. Geisendorf stated
that if necessary the golf course could go back to using well water for
irrigation, even though it is not considered desirable due to high
IV->
salinity.
Mr. Bill Anderson, a resident of Chula Vista, spoke in opposition to the
proposed fee increase. Mr. Anderson is not pleased with the current
physical condition of the golf course and he feels that he has been
treated in a rude manner by some American Golf employees, because of
this, he opposes the currently proposed rate increase.
Mr. George Laury, a resident of Chula Vista, spoke in opposition to the
fee increase. Mr. Laury stated that while he has always been treated
with respect at the golf course, he has found some things in disrepair
such as the drinking fountain in the pro shop and some of the greens and
doesn't feel that there should be an increase in fees until these items
are handled.
Mr. Douglas Hawkins, a resident of Bonita, compared the rates of other
golf courses in the area; Balboa and Torrey Pines. He would like to see
a special rate for Chula Vista residents a monthly rate, and a rate for
seniors. He feels that a one year span is too short for another rate
increase. Mr. Hawkins stated that he could play EastLake cheaper than
he could play his own city-owned golf course.
Mr. Tom O'Connor, a resident of Chula Vista, finds the American Golf
employees to be extremely courteous and helpful. In addition, he feels
that American Golf has done a very good job in maintaining the golf
course. He has compared the green fees with other golf courses in the
area and finds them to be lower even though conditions at the Chula
Vista golf course are better maintained than the other courses.
Park Superintendent Foncerrada stated that the proposed fee increase is
in line with rates at other comparable courses in the area. He further
stated that American Golf has complied with all of the terms and
conditions of their contract. He has not received any complaints from
citizens or golf course patrons about conditions at the golf course.
It is his opinion that the golf course is in the best condition it has
ever been in. Mr. Foncerrada pointed out to the Commission that
American Golf has completed a number of capital improvement projects
that are above and beyond what the initial contract called for.
Chair Sandoval-Fernandez stated that, based on the input received, she
feels that is too soon for the Commission to make a decision. She would
like to see an example of a tiered fee schedule, with one fee for Chula
vista residents and a different fee for non-residents, and also a
specification on timelines as to when some of the improvement items are
to be done.
commissioner willett requested that staff verify some of the rates that
have been quoted by some of the members of the public. He also noted
that some clubs are trying to hold the amount of their rate increases
to the CPI this year, and stated that the rate increase currently
proposed by American Golf exceeds the CPl.
Motion to table this issue until February, have American Golf come back
with a two-tiered proposal or three-tiered proposal, have staff analyze
IY-(,
this proposal and have staff check on current rate structures at
comparable facilities in San Diego County and clarify the timelines on
issues related to the contract.
MSC SANDOVAL-FERNANDEZ//LIND 4-0
b. CV2000 Reports
At the request of the Chair, Director Valenzuela briefed the Commission
on the report highlighting those recommendations which he considered
most significant, and gave a status report on those CV2000
recommendations which were currently being acted upon.
Commissioner Roland doesn't think it is a good idea for the city to buy
land in the immediate vicinity of a school because if the school needs
to expand with the growth of the City, the land will be needed by the
school. .
Commissioner Willett feels that the City should acquire the property
under redevelopment so if you do need to increase the school or the park
the land will already be in the public domain.
Chair Sandoval-Fernandez referred to Page 6 and the statement about
multi-cultural and ethnic changes taking place in the community, and
cautioned staff not to frame that in a negative context. She feels that
the statement, while phrased very delicately, could be interpreted in
a manner that is derogatory to the Hispanic population.
Motion to approve in content the recommendations that are set forth in
the CV2000 report.
MSC WILLETT/LIND 4-0
c. GMOC Report - Park Issues
Director Valenzuela recapped the concerns expressed by the GMOC, and
staff's response to these concerns.
One of the main concerns of the GMOC is that PAD
appropriately. Director Valenzuela stated that no PAD
used for park upgrades unless a nexus could be drawn.
Motion to approve the recommendations.
fees be used
fees would be
MSC ROLAND/WILLETT 4-0
d. PAD Fee Increase
Director Valenzuela introduced Principal Management Assistant Stokes who
gave the Commission a recap of the process and criteria used to arrive
at the proposed PAD fee increase.
Commissioner Willett stated that based on recent research he has done
11/-7
in this area, it is his opinion that the figures proposed by staff are
appropriate.
Motion to accept the report and send it forward to Council with the
Commission's recommendation.
MSC WILLETT/SANDOVAL-FERNANDEZ 4-0
e. EastLake Park Tour
Director Valenzuela stated Commissioner Hall had called him requesting
that the Commission accept Mr. Bob Santos invitation to go on a tour of
the EastLake Park site, and discuss the existing condition and future
plans for the area.
Commissioner Willett recommended that the Commission have an updated map
before the tour.
Chair Sandoval-Fernandez suggested that Commissioner Hall should be
consulted before setting a date for the tour as he had specifically
expressed an interest in attending. She further suggested that if
commissioner Hall's schedule could accommodate it, a lunch time tour
would be appropriate.
Commissioner Willett will be out of town through January 31, 1991.
f. 4th and Oranae Avenue Park Site
Director Valenzuela stated that based on actions taken at the joint
meeting of the Parks and Recreation Commission and the Library Board,
the concept park plan has been tabled. It is hoped that deferring this
plan to the library will facilitate their acquisition of an $8 million
grant to build a library on the site.
Per the Commission's request at that meeting, a letter has been drafted
to Council, reminding them that there still is a park plan for, and
interest in having a park at, that site. Director Valenzuela drew the
Commission's attention to the draft of that letter which was included
in their packets and asked for comments.
It was the consensus of the Commissioners that the letter, with minor
revision by Chair Sandoval-Fernandez, be signed and sent to Council.
g. Tennis Center Aareement
Acting Recreation Superintendent Gates gave an overview of Council's
recommendation on the Tennis Center agreement, in particular, the GPA
requirement.
Commissioner Willett has done a detailed study of the situation, and
found that there has never been a student dismissed from the program
because of the scholastic requirement. He sees it as an incentive for
the students to keep their grades up.
/v-tt
Director Valenzuela pointed out that the California Interscholastic
Federation's standard is 2.0, and he felt that Council was trying to
make this program consistent with this standard.
Commissioner Lind stated that in his opinion, the scholastic requirement
was not a big issue either way, because the type of youth involved in
the program would be getting good grades anyway.
Motion to support Council's recommendation and send the agreement back
to Council.
MSUC WILLETT/LIND 3-1 (Sandoval-Fernandez opposed)
h. Goals
Director Valenzuela presented the Commission with the Department's goals
for the upcoming year.
commissioner willett commended the Director on the goals statement.
Motion to accept the departmental goals.
MSC WILLETT/ROLAND 4-0
** Motion to add Terra Nova Park Improvement plan revisions to the agenda
as an emergency item.
MSC WILLETT/ROLAND 4-0
i. Terra Nova Park Imorovement Plan Revisions
Director Valenzuela introduced Nick DeLorenzo of Gillespie/ DeLorenzo
who presented the revisions and refinements to the Terra Nova Park
Improvement Plan. He did a comparison of the former and current plan
and discussed the reasons why the changes were made.
In response to Commissioner willett's questions Mr. DeLorenzo assured
the Commission that the soccer field still meets AYSO standards.
Motion to accept the revised concept plan.
MSC WILLETT/ROLAND 4-0
5. COMMUNICATIONS
a. Written Corresoondence
NONE
b. Commissioner's Comments
WILLETT
Commended Director Valenzuela on his presentation of
If-P
Department goals, and stated that he is going to present them to the
Chula vista 21 Committee as a guideline.
Commissioner willett would like the Commission to be notified of all
public hearings involving parks.
LIND - Requested that the Youth Sports Council be advised when playing
fields are going to be taken out of service.
Asked if the water restrictions will have an effect on ballfields.
The Director confirmed that all parks, open space and ballfields will
be affected by the water restrictions.
ROLAND - Expressed his concerns about placing parks under power lines.
6. MONTHLY REPORT OF DEPARTMENT ACTIVITY AND COUNCIL ACTION
Director Valenzuela announced the appointment of Sunny Shy to the
position of Recreation Director for the Department.
ADJOURNMENT to the regularly scheduled meeting of February 21, 1991.
Respectively submitted,
Ca~r tJf#,
/'1-/0
Attachment B
Minutes of a
Regular Meeting of the
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
DRAFT
Thursday 6:00 p.m.
February 21, 1991
Parks and Recreation
Conference Room
*******************
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Chair Sandoval-Fernandez, Commissioners
Carpenter, Hall, Lind, Roland, willett
Commissioner Helton
MEMBERS ABSENT:
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES
Chair Sandoval-Fernandez pointed out that some of the
discussion and the motion to table was omitted from section
4a. of the minutes. In addition, she requested that the words
"open space" be added to the Director's comments on the impact
of water restrictions. (Revised January minutes attached)
The minutes of the meeting of January 17, 1991 were approved
as amended.
MSC WILLETT/LIND 6-0
2. HEARINGS OR PUBLIC REMARKS
None
3. UNFINISHED BUSINESS
a. Greq Roqers Park Master Plan
Director Valenzuela gave an overview of the rev~s~ons that
have been made to the Greg Rogers Park Master Plan. He stated
that these revisions were made based on input received at two
Community meetings. The revised plan has been taken back to
the Community and received their approval.
Commissioner willett expressed concern regarding ballfield
lighting. It is his feeling that only one of the ballfields
should be lighted, and that the lights should face the
southeast toward the Boys/Girls Club.
Director Valenzuela assured the Commission that staff's
recommendation is that only one ballfield be lighted.
let -, I
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES
FEBRUARY 21, 1991
2
commissioner willett would like to see more entries into the
parking lot and cut outs at the point of entry due to the fact
that Oleander is a fast paced street.
The Director stated that the Traffic Engineering Division
would have to be consulted regarding the cut outs.
Mike Gunnar, a resident of Chula Vista, commented on the
Community involvement in the park planning process. He
commended the Department on their seeking the community's
input and their responsiveness to the community's ideas and
feelings.
Commissioner Hall complimented staff on the handling of the
park planning process.
Motion recommend approval of the master plan with Commissioner
willett's comments taken into consideration.
MSC WILLETT/HALL 6-0
b. Golf Course Fee Increase
Park Superintendent Jerry Foncerrada presented proposal for
a multi-tiered greens fees system which is based on the system
in place in the City of San Diego. The San Diego fees are
reviewed on a yearly basis and generally raised based on the
CPI. Approximately five years ago, the City of San Diego
adopted a non-resident fee schedule for all activities, with
the multi-tiered greens fee schedule being a part of this
master schedule. The manager of the San Diego golf course
feels that the multi-tiered system is a minor administrative
problem, in this case it is handled by City employees at the
starter booth, but in the case of American Golf, a private
enterprise, they would probably have to hire additional staff
to handle such a system. No other courses surveyed had a
multi-tiered system with the exception of Torrey Pines. Park
Superintendent Foncerrada did not feel that Torrey pines is
a good comparable as it has a nationwide reputation and draws
many visitors because of this.
Park Superintendent Foncerrada feels that one major drawback
to the multi-tiered system as it related to the Chula Vista
Golf Course is the fact that 60% of the golfers using the
course are non-resident (County rather than City residents).
Park Superintendent Foncerrada's research revealed that only
two cities in the County that have a senior citizen's rate are
San Diego and Chula Vista. He feels that the current 50%
It! ,,/;4
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES
FEBRUARY 21, 1991
3
discount being offered to seniors at Chula Vista is
appropriate and in line with what other public entities such
as transit, trolley and private enterprises throughout the
City are offering. The Department recommends that the $40 per
month senior cards be eliminated but the $10 per year card be
continued.
Johnny Gonzales, Manager of the Chula Vista Golf Course, gave
a slide presentation showing the improvements that have been
made in the Golf Course over the last few years.
Bill Anderson, a resident of Chula Vista, stated that the golf
course is not maintained to standards, and that some of the
improvements just shown in the slide show were not done to
specification. He feels that people who live in Chula vista
own the golf course and should get preferential treatment over
those people who come from Canada. He believes that American
Golf gives away greens fees. He thinks that a citizens
committee should take over the monitoring and administration
of the golf course contract.
Bob Strahl, a resident of Chula Vista, has been playing the
Chula vista course since 1970, and is a former member of the
Chula Vista Parks and Recreation Commission. He feels that
Johnny Gonzales is doing an excellent job as golf course
manager and if he has made enemies it is because he is doing
his job in a manner that is professional and business-like.
Regarding the condition of the golf course, Mr. Strahl stated
that in the past year he has played the following courses:
Tijuana, Pauma Valley, Mission TrailS, Coronado, Yorba Linda
and Chula vista. Allowing for the fact that the condition of
any course is based on the money available to maintain it, he
feels that golfers who play the Chula Vista Golf Course are
definitely getting their money's worth. Mr. Strahl pointed
out that the portion of the greens fees that goes to the city
does not go back into the maintenance of the golf course, nor
does it go to the Parks and Recreation Department, but into
the general fund. It is his opinion that if the City is
concerned with the fee increase or the maintenance of the golf
course it should consider taking a lesser percentage.
Douglas Hawkins, a resident of Bonita, doesn't want to
eliminate the senior rate. He would like to see a citizens
"watchdog" committee set up to report everything American Golf
does back to the Commission.
Pat Majors, a resident of Bonita, plays both Balboa and Chula
Vista courses and would much rather play Chula vista even
though it costs $5.00 less. She feels that the rate increase
is justified. She also feels that 50% off is a reasonable
/'1-/3
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES
FEBRUARY 21, 1991
4
discount for seniors. She agrees with the recommendation that
the multi-tiered not be used.
Ray Cayla, a resident of Chula Vista, would like to see the
senior rates left intact. He feels that if the senior rates
are changed a lot of seniors will quit playing the Chula vista
Golf Course and go to other courses, even though the other
courses cost more.
David Butler, a resident of Bonita, pointed out that on Page
3 of the contract it states that all fairways must be aerified
at least 3 times per year. He does not feel that this is
being done. He would like an inspection team formed to
inspect and monitor the care of the fairways. He is in favor
of a tiered fee system.
R. W. Brown, a resident of EI Cajon, President of the Rohr
Industries Golf Association, stated that the members of the
Rohr golf Association are opposed to a tiered system. Such
a system would have a negative impact on them as most of them
do not live within the Chula vista City limits. They feel,
however, that even though they are not residents, they work
in Chula vista and spend their money in Chula Vista and should
not be penalized when it comes to playing golf.
He feels that the golf course is being very well maintained
by the current management in contrast to the poor condition
it was in when the City managed it.
commissioner Roland questioned whether or not Mr. Brown was
qualified to speak for the Rohr Golf Association.
Mr. Brown stated that since he has been re-elected as
president for 16 years, he feels qualified to represent that
organization.
John Relph, a resident of Chula vista, feels that the best
deal in San Diego County is at Chula vista Golf Course. He
feels that when you play Chula vista you get your money's
worth. He has played various courses around the County and
thinks that Chula vista's rates are very fair for what you
get.
Scott Alevy, a resident of Chula vista, respects and likes
Johnny Gonzalez and feels that he is doing a very good job.
He stated, however, that he would avoid discussing the
condition of the golf course as the agenda specifies, golf
courses fee increase as the item for discussion. He likes the
multi-tiered fee structure.
It! "/'1
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES
FEBRUARY 21, 1991
5
commissioner willett is concerned about citizens who come
forward with criticisms regarding sections of a contract that
are not being complied with. He feels that statements of this
specific nature should be submitted in writing through staff
so that staff could evaluate them, make a recommendation and
bring it to the Commission in an orderly manner.
Mr. Gerald Oliveira, a resident of Chula vista, stated that
he had tried to get a copy of the contract, and had left no
less than eight messages for Jerry Foncerrada in the interest
of obtaining a copy of the contract. He stated that his calls
were never returned.
commissioner Carpenter asked what process is in place in the
Department to monitor contract compliance.
Park Superintendent Foncerrada stated that he inspects the
golf course at least once a month. He makes a visual
inspection of the course and plays the course, but no written
report is filed.
commissioner Hall is not comfortable with setting up a
"watchdog" committee, because he does not feel that they would
have the type of professional expertise to deal with the
contractual issues. City staff is the best qualified to carry
out inspection for contract compliance. He does, however,
feel the there should be some type of formal report to the
Commission from staff on the conditions and compliance issues.
Park Superintendent Foncerrada stated that during the time
when non-compliance with the contract was a concern because
contractual improvements were not being made in a timely
manner, staff made frequent reports to the Commission and to
the Council. However, the last of the contractual
improvements was completed two years ago, and since that time
American Golf has continued to make improvements on their own
above and beyond the requirements of the contract.
Commissioner Willett reinforced Park Superintendent
Foncerrada's statement that the Commission was furnished with
frequent and detailed reports during the time when contract
compliance was in question.
Chair Sandoval-Fernandez likes the tiered system, but feels
that some provision should be made for people who work in the
City but live outside the City to play at a reduced rate.
commissioner Roland feels that the city of
subsidizes the youth of the city for recreational
they should do the same for senior citizens.
Chula Vista
programs and
It{ ""I)'
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES
FEBRUARY 21, 1991
6
Motion to leave the senior 'resident tickets as is, with a $2
increase per round for County residents and a $3 increase per
round for non-county residents
ROLAND - Motion failed for lack of a second
Motion that Senior and Resident tickets remain as is.
MSF ROLAND/LIND 3-3
Commissioner Lind thanked the members of the public for all
of their input both pro and con. In his opinion their is no
clear cut answer to the mat~er of a greens fee increase.
commission willett suggested that the following three items
be voted on separately: 1) multi-tiered fee system, 2) senior
citizen rate proposal, 3) monthly rate recommendation.
Motion to accept the staff recommendation that a multi-tiered
fee system not be instituted.
MSF WILLETT/CARPENTER 3-3
Motion to adopt the staff recommendation that the $40 per
month plus per round fee be eliminated and ten year yearly
senior card system be approved.
MSF WILLETT/HALL 2-4
Motion to adopt the recommendation that a monthly pass system
not be implemented.
MSC WILLETT/HALL 4-0 LIND-ROLAND ABSTAINED
Motion that any future rate increase proposals that come
before the Commission be accompanied by a report of condition
as it relates to the contract term being met or not met.
MSC HALL/WILLETT 6-0
Park Superintendent Foncerrada reminded the Commission that
when this item was first considered by the Commission in
January, a comprehensive report on the status of capital
improvement projects was offered.
Upon the Commission's request, Park Superintendent Foncerrada
gave an extemporaneous report on the history of the financial
arrangements between the city of Chula vista and American
Golf. In addition, he provided the Commission with estimated
1'/ -/~
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES
FEBRUARY 21, 1991
7
figures on annual revenue realized by the City from the Golf
Course and an overview of how that money is handled within the
City.
Director Valenzuela reviewed the staff recommendation for fee
increases, item by item. He stated that the staff recommended
fee increase is a compromise between the fee increase proposed
by American Golf and the current fees.
Motion to support staff's recommendation for a fee increase
with the exception of the senior monthly resident.
MSC WILLETT/HALL 4-2
Chair Sandoval-Fernandez stated that she is not convinced that
any increase is justified. She feels that it is not necessary
to have an increase every year; that every two to three years
is more reasonable. In addition, she feels that staff should
take a look at implementing a tiered system with higher fees
for non-residents.
c. EastLake Golf Course MembershiD criteria
Director Valenzuela reported that he had spoken with a
representative from EastLake and found that there is currently
no criteria in place for membership in the EastLake Golf
Course. Staff will fOllow-up, and when criteria is set, will
report that criteria to the Commission.
Chair Sandoval-Fernandez said that since there are new
Commissioners on board, it would be an excellent time for the
Commission to take the tour of EastLake that they had
previously discussed. The following Commissioners expressed
an interest in going on the tour: Carpenter, Hall, Lind,
Roland and Sandoval-Fernandez.
4. NEW BUSINESS
a. Future Memorial Bowl ImDrovements
Director Valenzuela presented a report to the Commission on
the condition of the Memorial Bowl seating, along with several
options for improving this condition.
OPTION A - $25,000 to repair the loose rock and the concrete
caps on top of the back rests and make them safe.
OPTION B - Shore up the structure itself by placing rebar and
a gunnite coating on the front, top and seating area so that
when you are looking from behind the bowl area you still see
1f/-17
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES
FEBRUARY 21, 1991
8
the same structure as it always was, but if you are down on
the stage you will see a completely different facade. Cost
estimate $150,000, including repairs to the rocks that are in
there now.
OPTION C - Basically the same as Option B, except that it
treats the back side of the seating area, so if you look from
the stage you will see the rock but if you look from the back
you will see a gunnite structure.
OPTION D - Calls for complete demolition of the amphitheater,
rebuilding it using the veneer as the outside surface, putting
in the proper footing and putting in new caps for the top.
Cost estimate $600,000.
staff's recommendation, in light of a tight bUdget year, is
to do the remedial repairs and defer the project until money
can be found to do it properly, rather than selecting an
option that will not be as aesthetically pleasing and may
cause further problems in the future.
Motion to support Option A.
MSC WILLETT/CARPENTER 6-0
b. Access to the Olvmpic Trainina Center
Director Valenzuela reported that he is on the committee, with
the San Diego Sports Training Foundation, to establish a
policy for public access to the Olympic Training Center. He
will keep the Commission updated on the actions of this
committee.
5. COMMUNICATIONS
a. Written Correspondence
Secretary Stohr distributed correspondence which had been
received regarding the golf course fee increase.
b. commissioners' Remarks
commissioner Lind requested that Director Valenzuela attend
the next Youth Sports Council meeting.
commissioner Hall welcomed Diane carpenter to the Commission
and remarked that the golf course was an agenda item on his
first Commission meeting as well.
Commissioner willett gave a brief overview of the Chula Vista
/'1-/1
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES
FEBRUARY 21, 1991
9
21 Committee including the history of its formation and its
mission.
In addition, Commissioner Willett complimented staff and the
contractor for the preparation of the Greg Rogers Master Plan.
commissioner Hall asked what will happen when the drought ends
as far as re-vegetation.
Director Valenzuela stated that parks and open space areas
would be re-vegetated with drought tolerant plants as money
became available to do so
Chair Sandoval-Fernandez asked about the status of the ad hoc
committee on child care.
Director Valenzuela suggested that, since consensus had not
been reached, one last meeting should be held. It is his
desire to be in attendance at that meeting.
Chair Sandoval-Fernandez inquired about the per page fee for
copies of contracts and documents. She expressed her concern
that the public not get the impression that the City was
trying to prevent them from reading the documents.
Ms. Sandoval-Fernandez was assured by staff the members of the
public could review documents at length at the front counter
of the Parks and Recreation Department in City Hall as an
alternative to having copies made.
Director Valenzuela suggested that perhaps copies could be on
file at the Public Library where the public could use a coin
operated photocopy machine to make their own copies.
Ms. Sandoval-Fernandez inquired about the frequency with which
this occurs. Staff responded that before the recent Rohr Park
and Golf Course issues, it had been approximately two years
since a member of the public has requested historical
documentation. Current documentation is provided free of
charge.
Commissioner Carpenter thanked the Commission for the
opportunity to serve and stated that she would do whatever
possible to enhance the quality of life in Chula vista.
5. MONTHLY REPORTS
Director of Parks and Recreation
A letter was sent to both area school districts inviting them
1'1-/1
PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION MINUTES
FEBRUARY 21, 1991
10
to join the Youth Sports Council. The Chula Vista Elementary
School District has joined the Youth Sports Council.
The Department has received a State award for a basketball
video. The award will be presented at the CPRS Conference in
Santa Clara.
Adjournment to the next regularly scheduled meeting of March 21,
1991.
Respectively submitted,
< ~ ~fJ
Caro Cramer Stohr
1;-;2.0
February 22, 1991
TO:
The Honorable Chair and
Recreation Commission
Members
of the Parks and
and Recreati~
FROM:
Jess Valenzuel~;'pirector
Carole stohr,~ecretary
Commission
of Parks
VIA:
to the
Parks & Recreation
Pursuant to the comments of Mr. Gerald Oliveira (Parks & Recreation
commission Minutes, Page 5) and the questions of the Commissioners
at the Parks and Recreation Commission meeting on February 21,
1991, my staff members and I have made a thorough search of the
record of telephone messages taken at this office between the time
of the January meeting of the Commission, January 17, 1991, and the
meeting held on February 21, 1991.
It is the policy of this office to retain a copy of all telephone
messages taken. Our records reveal only one call from Mr. Oliveira
where a call back message was left. The call was received at 10:40
a.m. on January 31, 1991, Mr. Oliveira left a number where he could
be reached until 11:30 a.m. only. The message was directed to
Jerry Foncerrada, Park Superintendent.
Our "keep a copy" policy is adhered to very strictly. I am
confident that no other messages were left by Mr. Oliveira.
I r-:J/
.. . t..
.. .....
Attachment C
31 DECEMBER 1990
,
JESS VALENZUELA
PARKS AND RECREATION DIRECTOR
276 4TH AVENUE
CHULA VISTA, CA 92010
DEAR MR. VALENZUELA:
ON THIS DATE AMERICAN GOLF CORPORATION FORMALLY RECOMMENDS
REVISING THE CURRENT GREEN FEE STRUCTURE AT THE CHULA VISTA
GOLF COURSE.
AS YOU KNOW, ALL 1990 CONTRACTUAL CAPITOL IMPROVEMENT
PROJECTS HAVE BEEN COMPLETED. OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CITY
OF CHULA VISTA IS AT ITS HIGHEST LEVEL OF RESPECT AND
EFFICIENCY. WE FEEL THAT THE CHULA VISTA GOLF COURSE'S
LAYOUT SURPASSES THAT OF ALL SAN DIEGO AREA COURSES.
OUR GOAL IS TO CONTINUE UPGRADING THE LEVEL OF MANICURING TO
THAT OF "RESORT" PLAYABILITY VERSUS THAT OF THE CURRENT "HIGH
LEVEL" MUNICIPAL MAINTENANCE.
AT THIS POINT, I WISH TO CONVEY THE ADDITIONAL RESOURCES THAT
AMERICAN GOLF CORPORATION MUST COMMIT TO, THUS OBTAINING THE
HIGHER LEVEL OF GOLF COURSE MAINTENANCE. FROM THE GOLFERS
STAND POINT. THEY WILL EXPERIENCE THE PLEASURE OF A
CHAMPIONSHIP CALIBER GOLF COURSE AT A MODERATE PRICE.
SEEDS AND PLANTS:
A MAJOR ADDITION WILL BE THE OVERSEEDING OF THE NEWLY
CONSTRUCTED CHANNEL. WE WILL HAVE AN ANNUAL OVERSEEDING
PROGRAM THAT WILL ALLOW THE CHANNEL TO BE MORE IN UNIFORM
WITH THE REST OF THE COURSE. ANOTHER KEY TO THE GOLF COURSE
WILL BE TO RE-ESTABLISH YOUNG TREES IN AREAS THAT HAVE BEEN
EFFECTED BY FROST, WIND AND OTHE~OUTSIDE ELEMENTS. OUR
INTENT IS TO MAINTAIN A PARK-LIKE ENVIRONMENT WITH AS MANY
TREES AND PLANTS AS POSSIBLE. ADDITIONAL EXPENDITURES IN
THIS CATEGORY WILL ALLOW US TO ENHANCE THE VARIOUS PLANTER
AREAS ON THE GOLF COURSE, THEREBY INCREASING FLOWER AND PLANT
COLOR THROUGHOUT THE GOLF COURSE. SUCH A STATEMENT WILL
FRESHEN UP THE OVERALL APPEARANCE.
2
AMENITIES:
GOLF COURSE AMENITIES SUCH AS BENCHES, TEE SIGNS, BALL
WASHERS, TRASH CANS, TEE MARKERS AND GREEN FLAGS WILL BE ON
AN ON-GOING UPGRADE PROGRAM.
Iq"~3
'.
..
.~
EQUIPMENT:
TO INCREASE THE eVERALL MAINTENANCE AND MANICURING OF THE
GOLF COURSE DURING FY90/91 WE HAVE HAD TO PURCHASE THE
FOLLOWING EQUIPMENT:
A. 2 EACH E-Z-GO TEXTRON UTILITY CARTS TO ALLOW GREATER
MOVEMENT AND PRODUCTIVITY OF THE MAINTENANCE CREW.
B. ONE EACH DAIHATSU MAINTENANCE TRUCK WHICH HAS ALLOWED
US TO MOVE QUICKLY THROUGH THE GOLF COURSE WITHOUT
DISTRIBUTING THE GOLFERS AS WE TRANSPORT SAND, DIRT
AND OTHER NECESSITIES TO COMPLETE DAILY/PROJECT TASKS.
C. ONE EACH JOHN DEERE TRACTOR TO PROVIDE MORE EFFICIENCY
IN MOWING FAIRWAYS.
IN FY91/92 WE NEED TO PURCHASE THE FOLLOWING EQUIPMENT:
A. ONE EACH NEW GREENS MOWER TO IMPROVE THE OVERALL
PUTTING SURFACE OF ALL GREENS.
B. ONE EACH DAIHATSU UTILITY VEHICLE FOR IMPROVED
PRODUCTIVITY OF IRRIGATION WORK.'
GOLF CARTS:
AMERICAN GOLF CORPORATION WILL COMMIT TO BRINGING IN 60 EACH
E-Z-GO TEXTRON ELECTRIC GOLF CARTS BY MID JANUARY 1991. NEW
CARTS WILL MAKE A KEY IMPACT TO THE OVERALL PERCEPTION
GOLFERS HAVE OF OUR COURSE.
ADDITIONAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS:
FOR FY90/91 AMERICAN GOLF CORPORATION HAD THE FOLLOWING
CAPITOL EXPENDITURES AT CHULA VISTA GOLF COURSE:
A. REBUILT TWO GREENS WHICH HELPED US MOVE TOWARD OUR
"OWN" GOAL OF REBUILDING ALL GREENS"$56.000
B. INSTALLED FRESH WATER LINES TO ALL GREENS TO AVOID
USING SALT WATER--$20,000
C. GRADE AND SEED CHANNEL WHICH IS AN ON-GOING ANNUAL
PROJECT-- $22,000
D. PLANTING OF NEW TREES (JANUARY 1991)--$6,000
FOR FY91/92 AMERICAN GOLF CORPORATION WILL HAVE THE FOLLOWING
ESTIMATED CAPITOL EXPENDITURES AT CHULA VISTA GOLF COURSE:
A. REBUILD ONE GREEN--$30,OOO
B. DRILL ONE NEW IRRIGATION WELL--$20,OOO
C. GRADE AND SEED CHANNEL--$20,OOO
PLEASE NOTE AGAIN IT IS OUR COMMITMENT TO HAVE CONTINUAL
UPGRADES. WE WILL. HOWEVER. SEE CONTINUED IMPROVEMENTS AS
IV-;2.~
.' ...
.
THE ADDITIONAL RESOURCES CAN BE UTILIZED. IT IS MY OBJECTIVE
TO GIVE YOU AN IQEA OF WHAT KIND OF COURSE IMPROVEMENTS CAN
BE MADE TO THE CHULA VISTA GOLF COURSE THAT WILL
SIGNIFICANTLY AND CLEARLY ENHANCE THE GOLFING EXPERIENCE TO
ALL GOLFERS. AMERICAN GOLF CORPORATION IS FULLY CAPABLE OF
PREPARING AND OPERATING CHULA VISTA GOLF COURSE TO "RESORT"
OR "COUNTRY CLUB" MAINTENANCE LEVELS. WE CURRENTLY OPERATE
NINE GOLF RESORTS AND TEN COUNTRY CLUBS THROUGHOUT THE NATION
AND EACH OF THEM ARE PROVIDING THE KIND OF PRODUCT AND
SERVICE NECESSARY TO BE FINANCIALLY SUCCESSFUL FOR LANDLORDS
AND AMERICAN GOLF CORPORATION ALIKE.
<
'./!f.
ERNEST B. III
ASSISTANT TO THE V.P. OF OPERATIONS
MISSION TRAILS GOLF COURSE
7380 GOLFCREST PLACE
SAN DIEGO, CA 92119
(619)460-5400
ATTACHED: RATE COMPARISONS
.
Irt-4S" //II~~6
ATTACHMENT D
CHULA VISTA GOLF COURSE
PROPOSAL RATE SCHEDULE- EFFECTIVE APRIL I, 1991
January 4, 1991
Parks &
Recreation
Present Proposed Department Commission
Weekday Fees Fee Recommendation Recommendation
18 Hole $12.00 $14.00 $13.00 $13.00
9 Hole $8.00 $9.00 $8.00 $8.00
Twil i ght* $9.00 $10.00 $9.00 $9.00
Super Twilight** $6.00 $7.00 $7.00 $7.00
Ladies Day $11. 00 13.00 $12.00 $12.00
Resident Seniors Rate:
Monthly Pass $40 + $40 + El imi nate $40 +
$1.00 $2.00 $1.00
$10 Yearly Card - $6.00 $7.00 $6.50 $6.50
18 Holes
$10 Yearly Card - $4.00 $5.00 $4.00 $4.00
9 Holes
Weekends and Holidays
18 Hole $15.00 $18.00 $17 .00 $17 .00
9 Hole $9.00 $11.00 $1 0.00 $10.00
Twil i ght* $10.00 $12.00 $11. 00 $11. 00
Super Twilight** $7.00 $8.00 $8.00 $8.00
Junior Monthly Card $25.00 $25.00 $25.00 $25.00
Standard Time
Daylioht Sayino Time
*Twil i ght Hours
**Super Twilight
After 1:00 p.m.
After 3:00 p.m.
After 3:00 p.m.
After 5:30 p.m.
WPC 1618R
/'1-:17
Attachment E
Ol W. 0 0 ! ~
Ol II ltl l3: 0 0 Q ijI tll to)
,... 1:1 II ~ ,... 0 11 CD Itl II 0
~ .B 1:1 !II r:: S- o II ,... 3 ..... ,... II t"
t:l !II 11 1:1 1:1 1:1 tr Q ":l
,... Q ,... !II CD 0 ,... <l
,... !II f1 II
.B l:l' 0 ,... !II II 'i ,...
CD 1:1 CD Po !II
\Q 0 ..... 0 Po ..... g-
o HI CD
0 !:. " z '" z n '" z n '"
m g < g m ~ 0 m
'" m 0 0 0 m 0 0
0' ~ :J :J r:: 0 r::
m :J :J 0
'" E ". a. n ~ a. ~ a.
0 '" m m m c::
::; m m :J 0 '" :J n '" :J
~ '" !!l. ~ r:: ~ 5 ~ ltl
0 :J
m ~ a. ~ Ol
:J m m ~
:J '" '" l>ll
~
IV IV ... IV IV ... IV - ... IV -
.., o. 0 IV IV '" '" 0 ... ... o. co ...
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
IV
...
o
o
IV IV
IV '"
00
00
-
o.
o
o
'"
'"
o.
... IV_
CON'"
000
000
...
.....,IV
000
000
o.
o
o
o
o
o.
'"
o
m - - m '" CO o.
~ '" ... o. o. ~
~ ~ 0 0 '"
m 0 <> 0 0 m 0 0 0
, 0 0 0 0 ,
IV ...
0 0
0 0
." l'
~ ~
o
o
o
o
o
o
00
o
IV
o
o
CO
o
o
...
'"
o
m - '" m '" o. ... - CO - '" ..,
~ '" N ... - ~ 0, u. '" - 0, o. 0, 0,
~ 0 ~ 0
m 0 0 0 0 0 m 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
, 0 0 0 0 , 0 0 0
IV ...
0 0
0 0
l' ."
~ ~
It(-~
ATTACHMENT F
COMPARISON OF 18-HOLE RATES
18-Hole Weekend 18-Hole Weekdav
Course Rate Course ~
R.S.D. Ivanhoe $30.00 R.S.D. Ivanhoe $25.00
Singing Hills (2) 27.00 Singing Hills (2) 23.00
R.S.D. Monte Vista 26.00 R.S.D. Monte Vista 22.00
Bonita G.C. 22.00 Torrey Pines* 18.00
Mission Trails 22.00 Mi ssi on Trail s 16.00
Torrey Pines* 20.00 Bonita G.C. 15.00
Balboa* 17.50 Coronado 15.00
Chula Vista Municipal 17.00 Balboa* 14.50
Coronado 15.00 Chula Vista Municipal 13.00
Oceanside** 12.50 Oceanside** 8.00
* Torrey Pines and Balboa's resident rates and county rates were combined to
get a comparable rate.
** Oceanside combined residents and non-resident fees and are currently
negotiating new fees.
WPC 1618R
I'/-~'
pl-- J()
\/
Attachment G
February 21, 1991
To:
Parks and Recreation Commission
and Recreation~
From:
Jess Valenzuela, Director of Parks
Subject: Proposed Green Fee Adjustment for Chula Vista Municipal
Golf Course
At the January 21, 1991 meeting, the Commission deferred a decision
on the proposed Green Fee Adjustment by American Golf for the Chula
Vista Municipal Golf course and requested staff to study the
possibility of a multi-tier green fee system similar to the City
of San Diego and address the concerns expressed by golfers at that
meeting.
Multi-tier Green Fee Svstem
Currently, the City of San Diego has a city wide policy that assess
a 50% surcharge to all non-city residents to participate in golf,
recreational activities, rental of facilities etc. This policy has
been in effect for the past five years and are adjusted annually
by the Consummer Price Index (CPI). A new fee schedule will be
brought forth to Council in March. Golf Course green fees will be
increased 8% - 10% across the board.
According to a spokesperson for the San Diego Parks and Recreation
Department, the non-city residents fees resulted from the impact
non-residents were having on city services supported by the general
tax payer in the City of San Diego.
The non-county resident rate for the municipal golf courses
resulted due to the need to generate funds for Capital Improvement
Project for the Torrey Pines and Balboa Golf Courses. The golf
division received very little if no support from the General Fund
for the needed improvements for some time due to financial
constraints in San Diego.
The manager of Torrey Pines Golf Course, felt the multi-tier system
is a minor administrative problem, but can be handled by the city
paid golf course starters. Mr. Walters did not feel the multi-tier
system was completely fOOl-proof and it has created numerous
complaints received from county residents.
No other golf courses surveyed in the county has a multi-tier rate
system. The courses surveyed felt the fees charged will cover the
operating expenses plus provide funds for on-going capital
improvement program.
(
In evaluating the feasibility of a multi-tier system at the Chula
Vista Municipal Golf Course, the following factors were considered:
1'1- 3/
/'
! \
;
i :/
a. Effect on county residents surrounding the golf course
and the immediate vicinity. Three years ago, a non-county fee was
implemented to assess visitors to the area; a 50% surcharge on the
green fees. The fee structure had limited success and actually
creates more public relation problems with out-of-town visitors
who had been coming to the Chula Vista Municipal Golf Course for
years during the winter months.
b. Administering a multi-tier fee program. In contrast to
the City of San Diego, the City of Golf Course is leased and does
not providee city employees to collect green fees. Implementing
a multi-tier system at the Golf Course would require additional
staffing at the starter counter plus new accounting procedures.
The city of San Diego's criteria for a multi-tier system, non-city
residents would be assessed a 50% surcharge and non-county
residents a 75% surcharge on non-city rates. Although a multi-tier
system would be advantegeous to city residents, the net effect of
a multi-tier system may result in a loss of non-city players who
will most likely resent paying a different fee. The City of San
Diego does not have that problem because the population of city
golfers in San Diego is substantially higher than Chula Vista's.
Recommendation:
instituted.
That a multi-tier green fee system not be
Senior Citizen Rate ProDosal
(
American Golf currently has two senior citiezen rates for resident
senior golfers. Their proposal request a fee increase on the $10
yearly card commensurate to the regular fee increase and the $40
monthly card remains the same, but request an increase of $1 to $2
for each round played.
In surveying the other courses, the rate of $35 per month for
seniors at San Diego and Chula Vista's Senior rates are a fantastic
bargain. Mr. Walter said that seniors account for 35% of rounds
at Torrey Pines and 65% at Balboa. The average fee per round at
these courses is less than $2 per round. Chula Vista averages 110
senior rounds a day. Mr. Walters said that Chula Vista's and San
Diego's rates for seniors are unique, not only in San Diego Conty
but in all the western states golf courses he surveyed. He said
that if San Diego converts the operation of the golf course to an
"enterprise" operations, the senior month rates will most likely
be eliminated or increased substantially.
The current Senior $10 yearly card still enables the Senior to play
as much golf as they desire Monday thru Friday at 1/2 the green
fee. This is comparable to discounts Seniors would receive for
the Chula Vista Transit, the Trolley and other Senior discount
programs in the community. .
A Senior who opts for the $40 monthly card and $1.00 per round fee,
conceivably will pay only $3.00 a round if they play twenty times
/V~~
l
a month. The $2.00 per round proposal by American Golf would
increase the average golf round to $4.00. Considering that, it
costs American Golf approximately $8.25 per round for every golfer
that uses the course to pay for the operating cost.
Recommendation: That the $40 monthly card plus the per round fee
be eliminated and the $10 yearly Senior card system be approved.
Monthlv Rates
Mr. Doug Hawkins requested that consideration be given to a monthly
passes for City residents who play the golf course regularly.
There were several courses that offered a monthly rate for
residents or members. As the chart indicates, there was a range
of $55 a month at Balboa to Coronado's $800 a year on limited
rates. The monthly rate system requires other to subsidize the
cost of a few players who ar fortunate to play more frequent.
Recommendation: That a monthly pass system nsrbe implemented.
(
11- 33/'"-'16
f
March 14, 1991
TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
VIA: John D. Gos s , City Managergt Recreati4,
FROM: Jess Valenzuela, Director of Parks and
SUBJECT: Information Item: Free Golf Rounds at Chula Vista Golf Course
At the Parks and Recreation Commission meetings of January 17, 1991 and February
21, 1991, a letter written to the Department by Mr. Bill Anderson claimed American
Golf was giving out "free" green fees as part of a golf club membership promotion.
He feels the City is being deprived of their share of green fees whether American
Golf collects money or not. The Department investigated the above allegation
by Mr. Anderson to ascertain whether or not American Golf was properly crediting
revenue.
American Golf confirmed a membership promotional package in 1990 which cost
new members a fee of $39.95 plus tax. This membership entitled the member to
one free round of golf when the member signed up and one free round of golf
at one of the six courses operated by American Golf in San Diego County. The
second round was restricted after 12:00 p.m. Monday through Friday, which is
generally a slow period. The purpose of this promotion was to entice players
to play more golf at American Golf Courses during this tradionally slow period
of the day. In addition, other perks included free visors, caps, preferred
starting times, handicap system, 10% discount on merchandise and eligibility
to participate in American Golf Course (AGC) Tournaments.
There were 1,500 memberships sold or renewed in 1990 at the Chula Vista Golf
Course. The renewal memberships were not processed through the Golf Course,
but directly with the Handicap Management Firm. The contract language interprets
this revenue received at the Golf Course as "other revenue".
The City entitlement would, therefore, be 6%. However, American Golf credited
$20.95 of each new membership to the home course to offset the free green fees.
The remaining $19.00 was used to offset the promotional cost, AGC magazine and
handicap system.
The Department consulted the City Attorney's office to obtain a legal interpretation
on how membership fees should be treated. The Assistant City Attorney felt
all the revenues should be treated as "other revenues" and the City entitlement
would be 6% of the gross receipts. The cost of American Golf's 1991 Membership
Program is $25.00 which does not have any "free" rounds included and is processed
directly through the Handicap Managment Firm. The Department will inform the
lessee of the City Attorney's opinion and direct them to designate membership
revenues as "other revenues".
In addition to the above concerns expressed by Mr. Anderson, he asserts that
American Golf has not fullfil led it's capital improvement commitments, and maintenance
standards are not being adhered to. Mr. Anderson's assertions have been evaluated
by staff. Mr. Anderson had some good points, but was not properly informed
on the major issues cited (Attachment "A"). The Capital Improvement requirements
of the contract he cited as incomplete included the following:
)4 - 30
Page 2
1. Removal of foreign grass from the greens.
2. Renovation of Trees.
3. Proper signs, course finishing and appropriate landscape.
4. New tree plantings. 400/year for three years, minimum size 15 gallons.
5. Construction of storage bins to hold all bulk materials.
6. Channel construction.
7. Cart paths.
A report (Attachment "B") was submitted to Council on September, 1988 which
provided the status of these improvement items. At that time, all of the capital
improvement projects were complete except for the channel improvement. The
channel improvements were subsequently completed when approval by all the regulatory
agencies was obtained.
Mr. Anderson's concerns regarding the operator not adhering to the maintenance
standards does not have merit. Two important indications are key factors on
the course condition. First, the Department has not received any complaints
regarding the course conditions and secondly, the number of rounds played at
the golf course has steadily increased. Considering the course is not a "high-end"
facility and the 100,000+ rounds played yearly, plus the high salinity content
of the irrigation water. Staff feels the course is in the best physical shape
ever. Some minor problem areas continue to exist, but the operator addresses
these problems expeditiously.
mc:1
)~-37
ATTACHMENT A
H
. .
\.
William Anderson
141 King St.
Chula Vista. Ca.
. t
Jess Valenzuela
Parks and Recreation Director
276 4th Avenue
Chula Vista.Ca.pI910
Dear Mr. Valenzuela,
The purpose of this letter is to put in writing the
concerns many citizens and golfers of Chula Vista have about
the operation of the Chula Vista Municipal Golf Course and to
make recommendations as to the proper solutions needed. The
focus of these concerns are three areas. First. the contract
with American Golf Corp. and the lack of compliance with its
terms. Second. the green fees that American Golf has not
reported and the revenue the City has not received. Third.
the potential legal action that we hope to avoid.
My credentials for making these claims should be known to
you, (so that you will understand) I am in a position to
explain the problem to you from an expertise level that no
one else in Chula Vista can. I have worked at many golf
courses in my life starting when I was 9 years old as a
caddie. I became a very good golfer and was successful as a
junior player. getting a scholarship to Michigan State
University. After completing my four years in Business
Administration. I moved to California in 1972 to become a
professional golfer. In the years since then. I worked at
several golf courses in Southern California in positions such
as starter. golf professional and General Manager. I owned my
own golf equipment manufacturing company for two years. In
1978. I was involved in the bid and operation of a city owned
golf course in Simi Valley. It was operated the same as Chula
Vista with a the company operating the course and the city
receiving a percentage of the revenue. I moved to Chula Vista
in 1984 and have played numerous rounds of golf at Chula
Vista golf course since then. I am presently the Club
"Champion of the men's club. In other words my whole life is
golf and at a level that no one else in this city can
approach either in experience or ability. I hope this
convinces you to listen to me so together we can save the
golf course from further destruction and the city from lOSing
more revenue.
The contract between American Golf and the city has not
been met as agreed. a fact hinted at by Mr. Foncerrada at the
public hearing on 2/21/91 at City Hall. The following is a
list of the areas of non-compliance:
Page 8 Section 9 Capital improvements in Exhibit C.
)\{-3b>
. .
Item 4 Removal of foreign grass from the greens.
Item 5 Renovation of tees.
.f
Item 7 Proper signs. course furnishings and
appropriate landscaping
Item 8 New trees. 400/year for three years.
Minimum size 15 gallon-.
.
Item 10 Construction of storage bins to hold all
bulk materials.
Item 11 Channel construction.
Item 12 Cart paths
These items have not been done. The greens still have two
or three kinds of grass. The contract calls for bentgrass
greens not Bermuda. The tees on holes 6.7.8.12.14.16.17 & 18
have not been renovated. The tees on holes 2.3.5.9 & 13 have
had work done on them that resulted in no improvement. and in
some cases. actual degradation of the quality of the hole.
There are many ball washers not working and have been broken
for months. as well as drinking fountains out of order for
weeks at a time. Some 4x4 wooden boards have been put in the
ground at different places on the course and are dangerous to
people walking in golf shoes and certainly not appropriate
landscaping. The sand in the bunkers has no business being on
a golf course it is too soft and remove the skill from the
sand shot as well as inviting injury to a player who tries to
play out of a plugged lie. Some trees have been planted
recently but no where near 1200 were planted in the first
three years. Bulk materials are routinely stored out on the
course especially on the 18th hole. The channel was to be
"concrete based" according to the contact. The cart paths
were supposed to be 6 feet wide. 95% of the paths are 4 feet
wide. There was supposed to be 8500 linear feet of cart path
which has not been done.
Page 9 Section 11 Maintenance of Premises according to
Exhibi t D
Exhibit D is 10 pages long and addresses maintenance needs as
minimums in terms of frequency of mowing. aerifying.
fertilizing and other items. I play golf or go to the golf
course every day and I have not seen the fairways fertilized
four times. let alone four times per year. The same goes for
everything else. no maintenance up to the standards
indicated. This is particularly harmful to the future of the
golf course. I am sure the city wants to be able to pass on
to our children a proper golf course. American golf has
replaced some of the greens three times and has yet to prove
they can replace a green satisfactorily. without killing it
later with their incompetent maintenance.
Page 11 Section E. Class A PGA Golf Professional
)If-'39
. ,
This is an important item because it allows for our members
of the Men's club to play it PGA association tournaments and
it allows for the development of assistant golf professionals
sanctioned by the PGA.
. ,
Attachment A Item 12 Promole the Coul'se expallding
tournament play and retain the Chula Vista city and the San
Diego County Open.
This is ve~ distressing that the biggest source of
prestige to the Chula Vista Golf Course. the San Diego County
Open, was sent packing. I also resent the fact there is no
City Amateur Championship. These tournaments would bring the
city some of the status it deserves. not to mention added
revenue. We should reinstate them. .
The contract refers many times to "industry standards".
a term which is open to interpretation. If it could mean
average or generally accepted procedures then American Golf
needs to do a lot of work. Every other golf course that I
have played in my life, which is hundreds from here to
Florida and Canada, plays foursomes. At Chula Vista fivesomes
are the rule. This makes money for American Golf while
destroying the pace of play and the quality of golf. This
could not by any stretch be considered industry standard.
As you can see, the problem is major and pervasive thru
all aspects of American Golf's operation. These violations of
the contract could be partial grounds for the action I will
recommend at the end of this letter.
The second area of difficulty relates to free green fees
given out by American Golf as if they owned the golf course.
Also. the surcharge on tournament green fees which I am
unable to find the basis for in the contract.
American Golf sold memberships for the last several
years, in 1990 they promoted them by asking people" Are you
playing free today?", They would then tell a golfer if he
purchased a membership, they would get a free green fee for
that day plus a free green fee for a future day. Using this
system, they sold over 1500 memberships at Chula Vista
thereby giving away more than 3000 green fees. American Golf
sold memberships at their other golf course operations in the
San Diego area at which they gave away rounds of golf at
Chula Vista. The number of free rounds given this way is
really not calculable. especially when you consider previous
years of this activity. Other free rounds are given to people
who do certain kinds of work for American Golf. employees of
the restaurant and marshals. The city should be entitled to
its share of these fees whether American Golf collects money
or not.
The Parks and Recreation department is supposed to be
monitoring the golf course. I would have said they were not
monitoring anything. but after the public hearings. I realize
the department simply doesn't know the difference. In the
) I} _ J-ID
Agenda Statement dated 1/17/91. facts were presented that are
irrelevant. Other statements are simply wrong. I hope they
are wrong in error and not lies. The statement says major
capital improvements are continuing and then lists some.
The greens were replaced because the maintenance killed them.
The second green has been done three times. Will they kill it
again? The greens expense was included in the annual budget
or they would not have been replaced, The price of the
irrigation syst~m was supposed to be financed by American
Golf and completed in the first three years of the contract.
The channel is an embarrassment. The first good rain will
destroy it. It should be concrete as it was supposed to be
originally. The trees are years late and too few in number.
The proposed green fees are double what a San Diego
resident pays. The fee increases are not endorsed by the
men's club. I attended the last meeting and there was
outrage at the idea of raising the fees. You underestimate
the effect falsely giving the men's club endorsement will
have. The increase in rounds played did not result in $30.000
in revenue for the city. The additional 2000 rounds resulted
in $2925 in revenue for the City based on American Golf's
figures in Exhibit D.
Using the figures in Exhibit D. it is easy to see
American Golf made an extremely large profit on the green
fees. The bUdget for maintenance was $432.000. Add that to
the share of fees paid the city ( $150894 ) and subtract the
difference. you get a profit of $423067 just from the green
fees. How much more from the car.t fees? The driving range?
The pro shop sales? I think you get the idea. Why do they
need an increase? I don't know either. We need to stop the
rape of the city by this company.
We need to bring the green fee rates in line. The people
of Chula Vista paid for the golf course once. Once is enough.
It was purchased for the use of the city. The same situation
exists in San Diego. We need a similar rate structure to
them. City residents are entitled to play golf on their own
golf course for less money than people who don't own it.
Mr. Foncerrada says the tiered rate schedule causes pulic
relations problems. In fact. the reason it was installed in
the first place was to solve a huge public relations problem.
The city residents could not get on their own golf course
because so many out of town people would play there because
the rates were too low. The city couldn't raise the rates
across the board since the people. of San Diego would not have
been able to afford to play . The only logical way to handle
the recreation needs of the city and keep the people happy
was the tiered system. We need the same setup in Chula Vista.
We need it for the same reasons.
It is obvious the Parks and Recreation Department does
not have much experience with golf course management
companies. The promises made by American Golf in the
agreement were never intended to be done. They certainly do
not want to bear the expense of building the channel in
accordance with the engineering report. I talked to three
/4 - tt
"
,
,
other management companies who were originally wanted to bid
on the contt'act, After they diecvver"ed the Cl)st of
constructing the channel, they decided not to bid. It is a
shame because the city would have received 25% of the
revenues instead of the 15% we now gel, 25% is induslry
standard for cart and driving range leases, So. not only are
we getting short changed on the capital improvements, but on
the income we should be getting. I know there one company is
investigating afIaw suit to force American Golf to comply
with the agreement or reopen the bids based on the new
criteria.
I recommend the following solutions. Written notice
should be given to American Golf to correct the deficiencies,
Unpaid rent receipts from green fees that haven't been
reported should be paid, These notices are permissible under
Section 17 of the agreement. We need to set proper rates. A
rate that lets the people of Chula Vista play their own golf
course and reduces the ridiculous profits of the management
company. If American Golf doesn't comply, their contract
should be terminated as allowed under Section 17. At the end
of this lease term in 1994. the contract needs to be
terminated even if American Golf does all the things it is
supposed to do. At that time, the city needs to chc1nge the
management to the optimum method of operation. This method is
described in the Nov./Dec. issue of American Golf magazine,
The city needs to hire a professional manager for the golf
course. Then we can put all the revenue into the city
treasury instead of sending out of tOWll to line the pockets
of already rich men.
jJdi<d.-.7 a,dLrC;-
14-4~
.
.
.
~
~
"
~
.
"
~
~
..
<
c
a>
I-
z:
LU
::E:
:I:
'-'
e(
l-
I-
e(
'8
o
..
c:
...
.
..
1:,....
1iOc::,.;'
0."
"C
c: 110..4'
o ..
.,,"' .
.= . ~ .
~&,C~
:I ~....
.. ",5
.-t .0.
.-tCO""",
~:....c:
eCO.....
:::e",Z
c: ..
o ..
u ~~;:
C"']'"
. C ....
.0...;
c:'"
. ...
."-f....O
~o~.:
.
...."u
;;L:Ct
...
o
.
.
."
....
....
"'.
..u
H
..
c:
o.
>
."...
...
..uu
u....
~.. ~
..,e~
......
c:
o '"
.. ..
. :1.1
:!Iii.
.~
... '"
....
.c:...
>... .
...>
..... .
..~..
.." ...
..
e .U
....N
.
1
..
II
.
...
I":
i
1
..
.
~
c:,;
Co
...
Ii
..u
"
Cl!'
...
...
" .
~ ~
5 ·
,,8'
~\
':\'
~
.
...
1l
.....
...c:
. I
= !
C~
:l
..
~J
...c:
......
ll.B
011
....
m
c
fa ~
",= .. ~ .
I~ .... ...~ .. .....
'" o . . ... ai ....
..'" ... .. .".. ~ & 0
.. .. ~ Iii . . .0 . .....
OO~..c:Lo ~ c: III \W ~ ... . ~ u
>8 ... .-t""gt;~: ~ ..o~ , 0 c: . . ..
h 0 ~c""cB .. ... .... .
e ""'0 .. ....OolJ. .. -3 . .
i". .c.. c: ... ...~ ... ..."." ,;
.s~..g-; .~'G ..., ... ... !i !i I
.. '" c:>... . .
:I~ l!l .. to 0 u,c f").... . 0 e ~ .. .ee .
... C...,Oc"" s.. ~ u := , "e
.. . o ...,. ..., 0 . u e
:::S ~ .... IW'" . ..!,o ~ u
... U 110 c: to . co >. ClI ..s .. ." . . . .....
a:; -3 c:c:.cClO.c e · ~ " Iii .... ,
OGl 0 10,,","""" ,;, lU C I f ~ c: ...
l! N............)C .!fC
..'" El .... .ee.. CCII f..-l ...,. . u
.~o.. o2:l ...,...\W ... ." 1C:" C
01;: 8 co \w,C..,.j 0 ... .... o c: .
.....co..., ,.... c"'......e . " . .cu....t 0 .
"':I ......... 0"'. ~ c: .. ." ...
N 1i:c:.li~"":Dr.. ....c:. .0..-4 C Ql ..-l .
~5! I . ....t,C. C u 0 .... "tl 'G -t . ... Ii
.. ...... . "' C." .. ~'C~:::~~,g.:l ...
t" =.!.t'5 a; g ~ i. . . . C
-3 5 ...; C ~ Q,'rj""".... 0 e ...
u ...t" II c: 0 <<I "l1 1lI.5'" \w., . ..
... . ,C:J 0 \W II. UIl"lIt'l"'....-4 llIC'IIIllAo ~D.Ou >
> "",C""' Q, "" ...,. U
e · to ",.. e. .., !oo.i'~
1":...00 "''''i
.. ,C C:..o 0."" 0 ...z~ .oN'" .'" .....
l
. ~
." I
...
. " ...
.. e .
~ ..
. " .. .
u I " .
15 . .
... ~ .
.. ... Ii ~
.. 0 . ..
.. c c:
I ..
1 c: , ..
.... 0 ...
... .... u C
... Iii
> . ... 0
g e ..~ 0 ...
ill ... c: ...
.. >c: 0 0
.. I ...... ... ...
... ..> .. ai
... ..... . .
. . ~ > > c:
" ..." 0 I .
e... c: C
0 .:
'" ..0 .. ..
..; ..; ..; 14 -43.
~
"
~
,;
,.
~
J
>>
.
.
.
.
.... ..: Cl ." '^ <<l" ." a "
L ..." .w~i.'''''..Clo -s.
"'... Ml 110 >....... 0
"'u 'Ii .....I:H...(I..... . ... 0
........ ... ~t .... . "~ . ..... u
. . ~ . e.. ".... .. IIi ,a..... '0 Jl: Ii
.....,a.D ...,A " ....QlI ......lIot I
if ..:. . ... ~H I~id~:u .s,!:Il,=~. ""! .8
'E. u f f · ... e ........lclIot
... i it eO'" t :.... . "" 004 0... E
1..!H >IW ::::,ac' :s.... N "" . ....
.... .. U I c: . . .z.;lle~..~e.. .H' c!'''''...."....u''''........
-=..Ii U -= :: ~ .!~8".g::a .<:
.... C:.D . c: ,..... ....8-3.!'~!uX"~~~ a.t;oSJIii Iii oq , .<:
..... ........ ~f~ :: i"~ Iii ~i "
oSJiiIUlI .- B.u,C....t....s .
c c g"G a Iii.z...... 51.1i.... .... . 0 N.... '" C . Po.... ...
....110 ..... .............".... .... ..
........ ".0 It"" ..I""~O..,.jllCClO lilt BJ"ec.. 0
II ,n e f. "', to1: j~ g;;: :,,=:: ........ .0."
1~. 't:.r:: -I ~.s8'.!:.3 ...
"':.'" "J.... ...."".1.... ""i .
. . .... .... U U J .. .. eUIlDJ .. u.... .
~ P:~ .... :. f c: . "" c . ..
.ll..~ oS ~.z;-=.:l::: ....,!.... ".10')'; oGle
....4011........ Iii ... g ~ U Iii e . .. 0 ~
~ ... "QA.!l. ~"'L. ..... .I"""".""
J.c:.co "''Eg ~1g""#i!3;~~f U .! 5 0'" .
U u'" ..c · ... el ~ c
.... . ::~f"'l IIol ......... III ,u eo 0 ...
. .. i........""....-;: · :... .... t 110.... "',.c at c: "" ...
'... ~" f 8'" ....""'0&.1 .w.....D,w 8ila.!U::B"'~... g'
1 ] 1. ..' ",,-3 ,Q ,,,.,C t 1 u....:II to"".... 1
Hie:} Iii .! !!'..; 11: O.-4)C .." ~ 1 Co') ;....... . c u ",1
... f.s.... =0::: =-;:... >.! ... 0,,", ""'5~DI.lc ." ...
. . ~oIoIL:1 . u........ c.... . {I 5 .. . .
... ... .....=>.1'" ... e ~ Il e... ... .... U to 0:::1:;2 ~ 01 ... ...
I r f".ClO ~ 0 ~ r '" e .... to e . "u ~ r r
! ...~ M" 'Cl CIo. ..... . Go J Jf.O ".uo
oSU ;: i i :i1S~:~~.s t~ .... .c:,cj,c.lkO
U ul5Jt:u U 16ool~"0~ ~C:.~ ~u U
I ! 1 .. Iii g
.c ~ ~ '" ... . ... ...
u 0 .c", Iii . . ... ".
I . .. u... ... ... .. . ~"'... ;.. ...
. .. . ... a "'... u .. O....u ",.c
... ~ . . O. i. ... .! 0"'c3~'<:"~ "'...
. . .... . CO" > .<: Cl:l i.... .. oIoJ Cl:l . ; ....
.. .. . =c""" .z 0 ." ... ..a
.. 0 ~ CII:.8~=..... ..... .... ~ .8: .....oIoJza'Wt:::: ...
... " 0 c a ... ... . 0 .... C . ~ ...'"
c 0 ..... . . 0 '" ... 0 ,,'0......... ... oi ~ - .
0'" u .-:.a......., ... ... !Iii ....c .. .ialoloJeo..,..u u... . .
!l ~H.! u . ... ..... .. C E'J-lii"'c C C ~ .
CoIoJC>"OC . 0 ~... '" ........ ....-4O.c:: 0'" .
... .... .z.:2e"~ . .c ...c . !: .... :It........ u U 0 " .
~ "0'" f ...... e. " I Co/) ... 0........ ~ ~
~ r. ....uft. .... " =~s~....~G1~"1 .. ~
.....1 ....0 ... . C 0...... . ....1.ull""If.... oc ..
,; ~ ~... .. ............ ~ . ... .. ... 0 ~ .. .
... . " ~ c c ...... .. M . ~g~ aiCl),,~,,", ...... .c 0
a : "'.. .Q 10.00. 0 .M. .5 c . .. ,,"'...
· Iii'" egc",..o ... ... c o . 0\ 10..-1.... C ~.... ~ I ~ Iii ..Iii .
... ...... .<: ... .... U C 0 u... . ....."........ · f
:.: t: o ,,:> lOCI) . 000 . N'" C I600l eo .... ...ll' o....i
... ... t... "-.coc .. ....... ...... =.~~glO ..
... ......,....0. , "0 ... . ~ .... .. . ......
. :-... 3.... :> 0..... U . .'" c ij .D.... l""I C. c........ . c... "
~..... >~ ..~ > ..... ...'" 0 .... ........u.... . c.c ... .
. .. . .e....Oi'l!!' ... '" ~... . '80 aa.... ... i ... 10.... ...... B
... .. ... ..'" to! c .. e u .... I6oolC....::s IC'" ...... .......
. ~ u .. ~ 0. I ~....~ . o M c e I ....>> u oIoJ .... c:a. o a ..~~
> ... . 0 0'" ... . ... ...! .... CJ. 0 ... ~... ~
0 · c i' > ..I6ool..... Q. C 2 Iii ... a.... u ....I.............IE o. .. '" >
c f.............. "'... "'. s~lJ ::c:c: t "'''' ... ...
. :-.'" .... ,... ...u ~:;: .... c.. "
.. .. .. . Do.3J ~~:I ...... ...a ...a. u.U....U.........ooo4. .. a ..ou
~
...
I
~
..
:
...
..
o
i
...
.
..
.
c
o
...
...
.
..
...
~
~
...
..
o
Ii
...
.<:
.
...
f
o
..
.
e
"
o
U
...
j
u
c
i
~
~
...
!
!
.
.
.
...
o
...
'"
Iii
g
...
...
.
>
o
c
.
..
g
...
...
.
t
Ii
..
~
~
o
.
:.
'"
...
~
..
~
o
..
...
j
..
...
...
.
!
"
.
oS
...
.
~
o
"
..
!
... .
.. ~
~~
.<:
"
.
...
...
~
.
u
.ll
..
o
1
=
...
g
...
.
Iii
S
.; ...
..:
.;
.;.
N -44 ~
...
...
N
...
...
...
,
,
.
'I
.
. .
... f
. .. 1
I
~ J
.... ....
~ ...
l! ~
...
. l! 1
::
I ... ..
.. 0 l
.. i
'I .. . .
. o.
e .. ....
':l H
1. ..
.1 il ....
':l ... .. :
. i ... 0
;;1 . .
l! u . ...
.... ~::;
.. . u
0
0 ..
.. ... ..~
-
., g .
.. . o. i 1
000 .0>
I!~ fi .....
I t e fa 0'" ~o;....
..... e~IC
..... .
It.;; ..... .. .
"'; ...-1....
..... a....!'C:
. . ...
.~.. l!. . &.l~..... IiO
oor" .... o.
.u.... ...."''0....
!11 ~3J ....;0
. > ...< Iii 8'~ .
.:0 f e . .....
..Ilfl": .! .; u 11":
... .. 0"
u ..... "'. ... ...
a-3.0 :3: :J . Ol .
f'''O'' U
~.... 10... e lIoo-S .......
..>... t ~ t
. ge1:o ItH Vol c.. 0 .
u Q,,D. ....0... tot Po Cot .
.;
.
Ii ... t .;
'0 1
"....
... ...
. . l!
.:o,a ... i
~: ...
l! ..
....
. .l!
..... ..
~I .
.... ..
. e
> > e
e e .. ..
.. ..
U ! .3 ~
..
0
.. .; .; ~
.... ... ....
1'-\ - Lf~
1 ,. ,. ,. - - - - - - ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. ,. . .
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL
of Chula Vista, California, for consideration of adjusting greens fees at
Chula Vista Municipal Golf Course.
Said action was initiated on January 17, 1991, when the Commission deferred a
decision on the proposed Green Fee Adjustment by American Golf for the Chula
Vista Municipal Golf Course and requested staff to study the possibility of a
multi-tier green fee system similar to the City of San Diego, address the
senior citizen rate proposals and finally report on a monthly pass system.
If you wish to challenge the City's action on this intention in court, you may
be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the
public hearing described in this notice, or in written correspondence
delivered to the City Council at or prior to the public hearing.
SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL on Tuesday, March 19,
1991, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building, 276
Fourth Avenue, at which time any person desiring to be heard may appear.
DATED: March 6, 1991
Beverly Authelet
City Clerk
l~-q"
ITEM NUMBER 15
STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT COUNCIL CONTINUE THE PUBLIC HEARINGS,
ORDINANCE AND RESOLUTION TO THE APRIL 2, 1991 MEETING.
J~-(
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL
of Chula Vista, California, for the purpose of considering a Growth Management
Program and an Amendment to the Munlcipal Code by adding a Growth Management
Ordinance as Title 21, thereto.
An Initial Study, IS-91-20, of possible significant environmental impacts has
been conducted by the Environmental Review Coordinator. A finding of no
significant environmental impact has been recommended to the City Council and
is on file, along with the Initial Study, in the office of the Planning
Department.
Copi es of the proposed Growth Managment Program and the Growth Management
Ordinance are on file in the office of the Planning Department. Any petitions
to be submitted to the City Council must be received in the City Clerk's
office no later than noon of the hearing date.
If you wish to challenge the City's action on this conditional use permit in
court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else
raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in written
correspondence delivered to the City Council at or prior to the public hearing.
SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL on Tuesday, March 19,
1991, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building, 276
Fourth Avenue, at which time any person desiring to be heard may appear.
DATED: February 19, 1991
CASE NOS.: PCM-91-5 and PCA-91-3
Beverly Authel et
Ci ty Cl erk
\5~
BDI
Attn: Bill Darnell
jllllFifth Avenue
~Diego, CA 92101
BHA Planning & Engineering
IIIIrMurray Canyon Road
San Diego, CA 92108
Buie Corporation
Attn: Douglas Buie
~Bernardo Drive
~ CA 92127
Construction Industry Federation
Mtn. John Seymour
Greenwich Dr. Ste F
an iego, CA 92122
EastLake Development Company
.t: Kent Aden
ane Ave.,
u a Vista, CA~13
Great American Development
Attn: Jim Carter
~ Street, ~
~iego, CA ~
P&D Technologies
Attn: Arnold~
.West A, _
~ Diego, CA 92101
Patrick Development
Attn: Tim Kruer
11I& Fifth Ave...........
!'r.iDiego, CA ~
Rancho del Rey Partnership
~ Craig Fukuyama
_ Hoover Avenue
National City, CA 92050
Urban Systems
......Kearny Villa Rd."""
~iego, CA 92123
Willdan Associates
~t : Richard Jacobi......
Greenwich Dr. _
an Diego, CA 92122
S.D.Assn of Environmental Bio.
@.campatterson
Morena Blvd.
an iego, CA 92110
S.D. Biodiversity Project
Attn: DaN' Hogan
P. O. Box
Julian, C 036
S.D.Archaeological Society
EIR ReviewRttee
P. O. Box
San Diego, 1
@arFink
La Senda Way
u a Vista, CA 91910
McDonald, Hecht & Solberg
Attn: Charlie Gill
1100 Financial Square
~ Street
~iego, CA 92101
Dr. Larry L. Leach
Dir. of Anthropology
San Diego State University
San Diego, CA 92182
ilIond Schlaefl i
Kearny Villa Rd~
an iego, CA 92111
IS -4/
Sweetwater Community Planning
Attn: John Hammond
P. O. Box_
Bonita, CA~002
Sweetwater Valley Civic Assn.
P. O. Box"
Bonita, C~002
tlMa iego Audubon Society
ifth Avenue
an Diego, CA 92101
~ns Coord. for Century Th
_1 Prado
San Diego, CA 92103
Sierra Clu~
P. O. Box _
Escondido, CA 92025
Crossroads
Itn: Carol Freno
lta Lorna Dri ve
on1 a, CA 92002
SANDAG
Attn: Ken Sulzer
_ Street, _
San Diego, CA ~
Chamber of Commerce
Attn: Don Read
lIIIIrourth Avenue
~a Vista, CA 91910
,
~. . , )~'
. C''''-9''I'' S'il' n':d' , PCA~91"ils"s' e'~nt"~C; '_ i."';~i0!y4"'~.:i~..:.,..i~;!'"
1'1 .' ,...~ ~..ttt:, e-~,",,-,.,.+.;iL-.,. .."::.... ......_.
. . '. . .
...:.
l......~". -.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service
U.S.Dept. of Interior
Division of River Basins
..... Avila Road
~a Niguel, CA 92677
Otay Municipal Water District
Attn: Keith Lewinger /
......Jamacha Road
~g Valley, CA 92078
Sweetwater Authority I
Attn: Garry Butterfield
~arrett
Chula Vista, CA 91910
C.V.Elementary School Distri;;
Attn: Kate Shurson
_East J Street
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Sweetwater Union H.S.District
.tt. Tom Silva ~
i fth Avenue
ula Vista. CA 91911
County of San Diego /
Planning & Land Use
Attn: Lauren Wasserman
~uffin Rd..""""
!rri'l5'i ego, CA g~
City of San Diego ~
Ining Department
C Street
an Diego. CA
/
City of National City
11 ning Department
National City Blvd.
ational City. CA 92050
John McTighe
McTighe & Associates
3160 Camino del Rio So.""'"
San Diego, CA 92108
15-5
~\ J'l.......,~
February 19,1991
DATE:
TO:
Beverly Authelet, City Clerk
FROM:
Nancy Ripley, Planning Department
Referral from Planning Commission meeting of February 13, 1991.
SUBJECT:
Please schedule the following for Council consideration at the meeting of
March 19, 1991
Forwarded herewith: Public Hearing Notice(s) and Mailing List(s).
Forthcoming: Resolution(s)
Public Hearing: PCM-91-5/PCA-91-3: Consideration of the City's Growth
Management Program and Implementation Ordinance
~r~x~j~~exxxxxxxx~ptx~~x~expr>>p>>xemx~>>~XMa~a~~~~tx~r~~ra~a~~x
x~xe~~tatX>>~x0r~~a~x~x
Resolution
Approving the proposed Growth Management Program
Adopting the Growth Management Program Implementation
Ordinance
Ordinance
IS -J"