Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 1993/03/30 Tuesday, March 30, 1993 6:00 p.m. Council Conference Room Administration Building Special Worksession/Meetinsr of the Citv of Chula Vista Citv Council CAlL TO ORDER Councilmembers Fox ~ Horton ~ Moore ~ Rindone ~ and Mayor Nader _ 1. ROlL CAlL: CONSENT CALENDAR (Items 2 through 5) The staff m:ommendations regarding the following iJems listed under the Consent Calendor will be enocted by the Cowu:i/ by one motion wiIhout discussion unless a Cowu:iJmember, a member of the publk or City staff requests that the item be pulled for discussion. If you wish to speak on one of these iJems, please fill out a "lWp.lest to Speak Form" available in the lobby and mbmil it to the City C1erk prior to the meetin[? (Complete the green for to speak in favor of the staff recommendation; complete the pink form to speak in opposition to the staff recommendation.) Items pulled from the Consent Calendor will be discussed after Board and Commission Recommendations and Action Items. Items pulled by the publk will be the first iJems of business. 2. WRITrEN COMMUNICATIONS: a. Letter of resignation from the Charter Review Committee - Vickie E. Turner. 3. RESOLUTION 17052 AlffilORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF POLICE DEPARTMENT CITIZEN COMPLAlNT RECORDS - The destruction of outdated citizen complaint records is being requested. The destruction is in compliance with 832.5 of the California Penal Code and conforms with the records retention policy. The purpose is to comply with Penal Code 832.5 and to conserve storage space. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Chief of Police) 4. RESOLUTION 17053 APPROVING THE FlUNG OF THREE APPLICATIONS FOR TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT ACTIVITIES PROGRAM FUNDS UNDER THE INfERMODAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION EFFICIENCY ACT (lSTEA) OF 1991 AND DESIGNATING THE CI1Y ENGINEER AS THE AUTIlORIZED REPRESENTATIVE FOR THE PROGRAM - California is scheduled to receive more than $200 million over a six-year period (six cycles) under this program. Projects must be directly connected to the transportation system and should also provide maximum enhancement to the environments and communities. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Public Works) 5. RESOLUTION 17047 REAPPROPRIATING FUNDS, RESCINDING AWARD OF CONfRACT TO NELSON ROOFING, INC. FOR THE POLICE DEPARTMENT BUILDING REROOFING AND AWARDING CONfRACT TO THE SECOND LOW BIDDER, LA QUlNTA ROOFING, INC. - On 2/9/93, Council awarded Agenda -2- March 30,1993 contracting for the Police Department building reroofing to Nelson Roofing, Inc. The contractor, however, was unable to provide the required liability insurance before the contract could be executed. Nelson Roofmg, Inc. was notified of the proceedings and was unresponsive. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. 4/5's vote required. Continued from the 3123/93 meeting. * * END OF CONSENT CALENDAR * * PUBUC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLunONS AND ORDINANCES The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearin~ as required by kJw. If you wish to speJJIc to any item, p1eJJse fill out the "Request to SpeIlk Form" avaiIob1e and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. (Complete the green form to speJJIc in favor of the stoff recommendJJJion; complete the pink form to speJJIc in opposition to the stoff recommendation.) Commerrts are limited to five minutes per individual. None submitted. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS This is an opportunity for the general public to address the City CoundI on any subject matto within the Council's jurisdiction thIlt is not an item on this agenda. (SIllIe kJw, Iwwever, generally prohibits the City CoundI from taking action on any issues not included on the posted agenda.) If you wish to address the Council on such a subject, p1eJJse complete the yeUow "Request to Speak Under Oral CommuniJ:ations Form" avaiIob1e in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the muting. Tlwse who wish to speak, p1eJJse give your 1Iilme and address for record purposes and follow up action. Your time is limited to three minutes per speaker. ACTION ITEMS The items listed in this seClion of the agerula are expected to elicit substantiol discussion and deliberations by the Council, stoff, or members of the general public.. The items will be considered individually by the CoundI and stoff recommendations 11/ilY in certoin cases be presented in the altema1ive. Tlwse who wish to speak, p1eJJse fill out a "Request to Speak" form avaiIob1e and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Public commetr/S are limited to five minutes. 6. REGIONAL SOUD WASfE ISSUES AND TIffi PROPOSED PARTICIPATION AGREEMENf - A presentation by Stephanie Snyder, Principal Management Assistant, on the status of regional solid waste issues and discussion of a proposed Solid Waste Participation Agreement. (Administration) 7. CLEAN WATER PROGRAM - A presentation on the history options to Chula Vista and issues concerning the new San Diego Area Wastewater Management District. Staff and consultants will present options available to Chula Vista for Wastewater Treatment and issues that need to be resolved prior to final decision to join the regional system. (Director of Public Works) 8. EXCURSION TRAIN OPERATIONS ON TIffi CORONADO BRANCH. A letter was received from The Western Group, P.O. Box 1544 Ogden, Utah 84402, making a formal proposal to establish excursion train operations on the Coronado Branch of the SD&AE Railway. (Community Development) Agenda -3- March 30, 1993 ITEMS PULLED FROM TIlE CONSENT CALENDAR This is the time the City CoundI wi/l discuss items whidl have been removed from the Consent CaIendm. Agenda items pulled at the request of the public wi/l be considered prior to those pulled from the Cowu:iJmemben. Public comments are limited to five minutes per individuaL OTIiER BUSINESS 9. CI1Y MANAGER'S REPORT(S) a. Scheduling of meetings. 10. MAYOR'S REPORT(S) 11. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilman Rindone a. MTDB: Southbay Public Transportation Plan 1993 ADJOURNMENT The City Council will adjourn to a Closed Session to discuss the following: Instruction to negotiate/property acquisition for Midbayfront (William Barkett, owner, parcel bounded by Chula Vista Nature Interpretative Center to the north; Bay Boulevard to the east; San Diego Bay to the west; and "F" Street to the south) pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.8. The meeting will adjourn to the Regular City Council Meeting on April 13, 1993 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers. * * * COMPlJANCE Willi AMERICANS Willi DISABIUTIES ACT * * * The City of Chula Vista, in complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), request individuals who require special accommodation to access, attend, and! or participate in a City meeting, activity, or service request such accommodation at least forty-eight hours in advance for meetings and five days for scheduled services and activities. Please contact the City Clerk for specific information at (619) 691-5041. California Relay Service is available for the hearing impaired. March 25, 1993 TO: FROM: SUBJECT: The Honorable Mayor and City Council John D. Goss, City ManagerJ~ \11 tt~ City Council Meeting of March 30, 1993 This will transmit the agenda and related materials for the regular City Council meet i ng of Tuesday, March 30, 1993. Comments regard i ng the Wr itten Communications are as follows: 2a. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THIS RESIGNATION FROM THE CHARTER REVIEW COMMITTEE BE ACCEPTED WITH REGRET AND THAT THE CITY CLERK BE DIRECTED TO POST THE VACANCY IMMEDIATELY IN THE CLERK'S OFFICE AND THE PUBLIC LIBRARY IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE MADDY ACT. JDG:mab . . .'iUCE, FORWARD, HAMILTON 6- SCRIPPS r', '\ ATTORNEYS AT LAW FOUNDED 1873 VleJOI E. TV.Kla, PARTNBR DIRECT DIAL NUMBER: (619) 699-2468 March 16, 1993 Honorable Mayor and city council City of Chula vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, California 91910 ~ ~ :u -<-< .- 00 I rt1 r-'TI " 1"TlC") ::O:x: - rt1 ~c:: '0 =< v>r-- 0::>- :I>' l'11 -ncr-"": '0 CII :JJU:; CJw--,\ ~ m);'~ '0 Re: Charter Review commission Dear Honorable Mayor and City Council: After long reflection, I have decided to resign from the Charter Review Committee. I have enjoyed serving with you over the last year. However, increasing demands on my time prevent me from continuing with the Committee. During 1993, I have been fortunate to be appointed to the Judicial Advisory Committee by Senator Barbara Boxer. with a number of upcoming judicial appointments, it is a particularly time consuming task. I have also undertaken the task of chairing a statewide committee and a County Bar Association committee which meets on the same evenings as the Charter Review Committee. I wish each of you well and trust that the Committee will continue to provide excellent analysis and recommendations concerning issues affecting Chula vista. Li;{;rely'" ViCk~~ of . Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps 97051VET/sjl LC , C5~(t/) ~~ \Vli'nEN COlth\\Ui'~ICA TIONS /:7 J/;CJ7'Y 600 WEST BROADWAY, Smn 1600 SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 91101 TELEPHONE, (619) 2}6-1414 FACSIMILE, (6X9) 131-83U 4250 EXECUTIVE SQUARE, SUITE 700 LA JOLLA, CALIfoRNIA 92.037 TELEPHONE: (619) 45S-66u FACSIMILE, (619) 455-1354 zll-/ COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item:..! ',OCSl. ITEM TITLE: RESOLUTION Authorizing the destruction of Police Department Complaint Records. SUBMITTED BY: Chief of pOliCe~0~lj (4/Sths Vote: YeS___No_x_l REVIEWED BY: City Manager,,)~ ~'~ The destruction of the attached list of records is desirable to conserve storage space and complies with section 832.5 of the California Penal Code. These records are past five years of age and the information contained within is no longer needed. Meeting Date: 3-30-93 RECOMMENDATION: Council approve the attached Resolution. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATIONS: None. DISCUSSION: Previously, records of this nature were kept past the legal purge date. Storage of these types of records is not necessar~ if there is no litigation pending. Prior to destruct~on, we will reconfirm, in concert with the City Attorney's office, that none of these complaints are the subject of current litigation. The Department's goal is to store all records in a proper manner and to legally purge records when necessary. Penal Code 832.5 requires law enforcement agencies to investigate citizen complaints filed against officers. It allows destruction of these complaints after five years. The records to be destroyed are citizen complaints and findings for the following years: 1970-1981- 7 Complaints 1982- 16 Complaints 1983- 1 Complaint 1984- 25 complaints 1985- 20 Complaints 1987- 31 Complaints These complaints were filed against officers by citizens alleging misconduct. These complaints were investigated, a finding was determined and ap~ropriate action was taken. with the action completed, sensit~vity of the involved complainant and employee is protected through destruction of the record. FISCAL IMPACT: None citcompl.res 3.. \ RESOLUTION NO. n DC:; 2.. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AUTHORIZING THE DESTRUCTION OF POLICE DEPARTMENT COMPLAINT RECORDS WHEREAS, the Chief of Police has submitted a list of files which are desirable to be destroyed in order to conserve storage space and complies with section 832.5 of the California Penal Code; and WHEREAS, these records are past five years of age and the information contained within is no longer valid; and WHEREAS, the files to be destroyed are citizen complaints and findings for the years 1972 thru 1987; and WHEREAS, these complaints were filed citizens alleging misconduct with said investigated with a finding determined and taken; and against officers by complaints being appropriate action WHEREAS, the proposed destruction is in compliance with the Records Retention Policy. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the city Council of the city of Chula vista does hereby authorize the destruction of Police Department complaint records referenced in the consent of the City Attorney, dated March 15, 1993. Presented by Approved as 4-~. Richard Emerson, Chief of Police Bruce M. Booga rd City Attorney (C:\Res\Deatruc:t) 3-;2. ~v~ :::~~ -: -..;~~.-..; ~~~~ CllY OF CHUlA VISTA OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY FROM: March 15, 1993 The Honorable Mayor and city cou~ John D. Goss, City Manager Bruce M. Boogaard, city Attorney Destruction of Police Department Records DATE: TO: SUBJECT: This office has reviewed the request for destruction of records described in Exhibit "A". There is no requirements under the law that we retain these records and Government Code section 34090 describes the procedure by which we may destroy these no long needed records. It requires written consent by the City Attorney and approval by the City Council. By this iting, the city Attorney consents to the destructio of these r ords. BMB:lgk ~ uLJ F: \home\attomey\destruct ? - /!s-/~ 3-3 276 FOURTH AVE/CHULA VISTA. CALIFORNIA 91910/(619) 691-5037 jiiH-/ ~ll IF 10 tITy!/riJ{t1$!!t Burr {:f'rJ;,~ Rude & Unreasonable officer when complainant asked for release of impounded truck. Officer requested complainant get duplicate I.D. from DMV, not allowing him to retrieve I.D. from truck. 1/22/87 Disposition: Unfounded ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2/24/87 Mr. Schonfeld 87-2 Disposition: 1 Sustained 3 Unfounded .-'" Failed to I.D. self & take action on restraining order. 3/12/87 Catalina Juarez ------------------------------------~--------------------------------------- 87-3 Disposition: Exonerated. biscourteous officer during traffic stop. 2/19/87 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 87-4 Disposition: Not Sustained Officer made numerous visits to a home - idle time was a waste of his taxpayer money. 3/12/87 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Unreasonable officer in arresting her son a few doors from his home. 87-5 Disposition: Not Sustained 3/11/87 Marjorie L. Newcomb ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Incomplete & inaccurate accident investigation by CSO. 87-6 Disposition: Not Sustained 4/4/87 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Officer over zealous and over vigorou in enforcement of traffic laws 87-7 Disposition: Not sustained ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6/3/87 Eduardo Gil Officer made improper impound of car & complainant claims car could have ~~=~-----------~~~-~~:~--------_::::_::~:::::_::_:~:-~~::::::_:::::: 3-~ 6/3/87 87-9 ..........ewis Lee 6/11/87 Disposition: Sustained \ . ..-.:1 Too ag~ressive, somewhat obnoxious and profanJ. ty used by officer to comPlainant's.. son. Also that son was singled out of the, three suspects due to his race. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 87-:).0 6/26/87 Disposition: Sustained Officer improperly voided a citation in an attempt to obtain a discount on draperies, or for some other favor. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 87-11 Disposition: Not Sustained Parent questioned legality of officer taking juvenile's picture. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6/30/87 87-12 7/4/87 Disposition: Not Sustained Officer #332 pulled cause. illegally impounded a car belonging to complainant and a gun on him without reasonable ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 87-13 Russell Brown 7/8/87 Disposition: Not Sustained Harassed complainant in hospital emergency room ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 87-14 8/3/87 Disposition: Sustained Trainee, under officer's supervision, white carded a vehicle & failed to notify the owner of the vehicle ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 87-15 Disposition: Unfounded Officer rude, abrupt and had a poor attitude while taking a crime report at place of business ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- . 3 -.5 7/4/87 87-16 Bryan Alan FIsh 8/6/87 Disposition: Exonerated ;':',." Officers used excessive force and injured complainant while arresting him. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 87-17 Disposition: Exonerated 8/25/87 87-18 Disposition: Sustained Officer while investigating a disturbance call at complainant's home, violated her rights by entering and looking into the interior rooms. Rude & aggressive & did not allow complain- ant to explain he was not the one involved. 9/2/87 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 87-19 Disposition: Not Sustained 9-15-87 87-20 Disposition: Sustained 4 Officer belligerent & overly aggressive while covering a disturbance & illegally detained & arrested him at his residence. Failure to turn in report & subsequently suspects released from SDPD in possession of complainant's property 10/5/87 ------------------------------------------------------------------~------------ 87-21 Disposition 9/30/87 87-22 Not sustained Dick Newton Disposition: Not Sustained Failure of officers to stop & dispurse loud party in park. On second request officers never arrived. Treated in rude and crude manner & officer threatened to hang up on him. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- . ~-/" 9/24/87 87-23 Javier Gonzalez Disposition: Exonerated Citation received at Marina & waste of expense & personnel in enforc- ing regulation. '\1 10/12/87 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 87-24 Disposition: Jeanette Gonzales Sustained - WA , ' , Officer rude in traffic stop, followed her too long before making stop, she couldn't write her story on cite, held her in car & broke her car door lock I I;. , , ~ i , 10/19/87 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 87-25 Steve L. Margo 10/25/87 Disposition: Not Sustained Officer unlawfully interviewed & grabbed complainant. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 87-26 Disposition: Not Sustained While off-duty, officer hit complainant in face during an argument at officer's mother's house. 10/15/87 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 87-27 Jorge Hernandez Disposition: Exonerated 10/21/87 87-28 " 12/1/87 Disposition: Unfounded Carland Woodson After stopping his son for a traffic violation, officer approached the car & physically removed him from the front seat, took him by the arm, took him to the police car, patted him down and placed him in back seat. During a search warrant off. conducted a search on a female bartender making her remove her blouse in front of other male officers and bar patrons. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 87-29 Disposition: Not Sustained That B.O. Clerk did not wait on customer who had been waiting in line prior to 5 PM and was treated unfairly when he could not get a copy of his accident report. -------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3-7 11/25/87 Nancy Acerrio Failure to follow police procedures by failing to document all info. and failed to document theft of 2nd set of keys. . 87-30 .', ,:;J ;uX" Disposition: Sustained - Written Reprimand --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11/30/87 Amino John Cendali Officer loud and rude while issuing traffic citation. 87-31 J /JJ/ .1 }" Disposition: Not Sustained 12/19/87 Shirley McGil Officer used abusive language towards complainant's son and refused to give the son your badge number. "" 87-32 /, , Disposition: Sustained - Written Advise "3-'&' 1/3/B5 Thomas GULIHUR Complainant cannot locate revolver officer handled when answering a 415 call (domestic). 85-1 Unfounded ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1/17/85 Bob CRANE Off-duty stop officer displayed a badge - officer used demeanor & untolerable acts. 85-2 Sustained ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1/22/85 Barbara Loretta Tovar Complainant felt officer should have contacted her daughter at home instead of at friend's house. 85-3 Not Sustained ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1/15/85 Kathy Boston Made uncomplimentary sexist remarks to complainant while off-duty and complainant and other witnesses recognized him as P.o. employee 85-4 Sustained 3/20/85 David Kessler While issuing cite, officer was abrupt, mean and acted as if having a chip on shoulder. 85-5 Not Sustained 6/7/85 Mr. & ~1rs. Mangrum Abrupt with complainant, poor judge- ment in writing citation, excessive force, etc. 85-6 Exonerated all charges except sustained on poor judgement in handling complainant ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 7/29/85 Failed to dispatch unit to pick up dead cat after two calls. When complainant took cat to shelter, you called him stupid. 85-7 Sustained - Written Reprimant 3- ~ f" 8/9/85 John Kenton Davis 85-8 Disposition: Exonerated 8/30/85 Diana Aguirre 85-9 Disposition: Sustained Discriminating in traffic ~nforcernent against those riding motorcycles and officer threatened to write cite that. did not occur. Animal shelter personnel rude & handled an incident with a hawk in very unsatisfactory manner ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8/30/85 Dick Rush/Peter Danielson 85-10 Disposition: Sustained Officer became personally involved when resolving a call. 7/26/85 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 85-11 Disposition: Exonerated 8/26/85 85-12 Disposition: Sustained Officer entered residence in civil matter. Rude and unconcerned and failed to dispatch a unit when request for service received. 10/8/85 ------------------------------------------------------------------------- ~art 85-13 Disp~sition: Sustained - WA Offended & insulted citizen who brought puppy to animal shelter. 10/29/85 Susan L. Schnepf ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 85-14 Disposition: Sustained - WR Unprofessional and apathetic dispatcher in dealing with crime victim over the phone ------------------------------------------------------------------------ i,?:;;~~ ~ -10 9/24/85 85-15 Mrs. Carlson Dispatcher procedure complaint ref. 911 line. Disposition: Sustained 11/5/85 85-16 Disposition: 11/22/85 85-17 Dispatcher complaint ref. not dispatching officer for call of burglary Sustained Protesting police treatment, being jailed and charged with a felony. Disposition: Unfounded 12/11/85 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ 85-18 Rude & threatening manner reo investi- gation of illegally parked vehicle. Also, that officer failed to complete the investigation. Disposition: Unfounded -----------------------------------------------~------------------------ 12/9/85 85-19 Arrested juvenile claims grabbed by throat, rendered unconscious and fell to the ground hitting head. Claims victim of racial remarks by officer Disposition: Unfounded ----------------------------------------------------------------------- 12/26/05 85-20 415 regarding parking on Broadway. Failure of unit to respond repeatedly, Poor judgment of officer not taking report and unnecessary officer comments. Disposition: Sustained - written Advise ----------------------------------------------------------------------- :s - JI ." 1/27/84/ 84-1 Disposition: Unfounded Complainant called to unlicensed solicitor. showed. request officer for -'""~ Stated no one ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2/27/84 / 84-2 Disposition: Sustained While directing traffic, officer made -" gratuitous gesture towards citizen who failed to comply with his direction. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2/3/84 / 84-3 Disposition: Not sustained Off-duty officer & family took food from restaurant. 2/16/84 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 84-4 Failure of officers to stop & assist when complainant had car trouble. Also, car had been impounded when she returned. Disposition: Not Sustained i/24/84--------------------------poor-r~sponse-to-call-for-accldent-vlctlm~--- Complainant also had to call twice. / 84-5 2/22/84 Disposition: Not Sustained ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 84-6 ./ In responding to an accident & gathering information, officer mimiced complainant who was a friend of one of the injured parties. 3/10/84 Disposition: Sustained ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Conduct unbecoming an officer reference shoplifting case. 84-7 Raul Hazon, Mgr. Vons Market /~ Disposition: Sustained ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 3/15/84 Leroy Sanders ~ 84-8 Discrimination by officer against complainant Disposition: Not Sustained -3-/2-678-4- -------- ----------------Wh-i-l-;-i-;;;s-t"ig-;tT;i-;r-s-;;-;e-P-;r-;-o-f-iic-e-r- -;e-ry rude and abusive and refused to explain reason for investigation. 84-9 Disrin~irion: Unfounded 3 -1';.. Mrs. Ciro Hernandez ~ 84-10 Disposition: Not Sustained ,,-,,- Excessive force in making an arrest & improper treatment of prisoner. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 7/4/84 Tedral L. Thompson ~ 84-11 Disposition: Not Sustained - Referred to complainant as "boy" & threatened to hit him with flash- light if he didn't sit down. Off. failed to show concern for injuries to complainant. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 6/28/84 84-12 Disposition: Unfounded 7/31/84 Carlos Estavillo 84-13 Disposition Not Sustained ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 8/9/84~ E. R. Walker 84-14 Disposition: Unfounded Saw officers while arresting and leading arrestee to the police unit, physically punish him with a night stick. More police action should have been taken after park assault incident Lack of professionalism on part of three officers and their failure to control suspected drunk driver at scene of traffic stop. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 8/16/84 Tommie Smith 84-15 Disposition: Not Sustained Complaint ref. citation issued son. Officer verbally abused son and cite was harassing technique. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 8/20/84 84-16 v Disposition: Sustained ~-J.3 Failed to dispatch unit on citizen request. Also failed to dispatch on second request. 9/28/84 vincent Christensen 84-17 Disposition: Sustained Officer used unnecessary force and vulgar language in the arrest of son of complainant. """'~l I ! ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10/25/84 Dave Mizer + 6 other complainants 84-18 Disposition: Sustained Excessive force used while arresting suspect after suspect was handcuffed 11/13/84 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 84-19 Disposition: Sustained - Counseled Displeased with police action when observed plainclothes officer choking man in custody. Also complained plainclothes officer called him an ass hole. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 84-20 Disposition: Unfounded Officers entered residence and arrested him. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12/9/84 / Robert Mautino 84-21 Disposition: Not Sustained Off-duty incident involving three male subjects in a vehicle. During contact, complainant's vehicle was damaged. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12/14/84 Barbara L. Keelan 11"" 84-22 Disposition: Not Sustained While issuing cite, officer was rude and sarcastic. Also, this unnecessarily delayed complainant and officer was not concerned with a possible medical emergency. 12/26/84 Brenda Wilson --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 84-23 / Disposition: Unfounded Excessive force used when restraining and cuffing complainant. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 - IIf . 12/31/84 84-24 / F~els police are biased in handling of neighborhood dispute, as complainant is homosexual. Disposition: Sustained - counseled ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- . " -~ 3 -IS- 2-3-83 Kenneth Ludwick Disposition: Unfounded V. Excessive Force --------------------------------------------------------- ;-/j" \ /" " ,,"'~ '-"'!I "_~~"4_"1!--"'~_""1!C'~""""" :~,~~.,_~;:I ,':W, ---,,-, 1/25/82 , 82-1 Mr. Dennis Yakas Disposition: Sustained Rude and demeanor stop. offensive attitude and of officer during traffic 2/2/82 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------~ 82-2 Disposition: Unfounded Improper officer action and merits of arrest involving her 10 year old son. 2/17/82 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 82-3 Poor attitude and manner of officer taking inaccurate accident report. Disposition: sustained ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 2/23/82 82-4 Hr. & Mrs. Daniels Disposition: Exonerated During a fare jump investigation, office used offensive language, hostile demeano and was argumentative. Also forced open a patio gate. 2/2/82 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------. 82-5 Gregory Allen Fernandez Disposition: Unfounded While being arrested for drunk driving, officers parked his car causing front en, damage to it. 4/23/82 Maria Hernandez Peinado 82-6 Disposition: Sustained Grabbed complainants arm during investi- gation causing injury. Also that officel used foul language directed at complainal daughter. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------. 4/2/82 Mrs. Lugo ---- 82-7 Disposition: Sustained Destroyed dog before lawful owner could redeem it. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------~ 5/7/82 Bob Webb Threat to company employee driving car that she should pay for damages to officer's private vehicle or receive cit, 82-8 ni q,nnq,; to; r"\n.~___ l\T1""\f- C,.,f-~;..,...~__ ?1 - (1 '> 5/25/82 l~s. Jenny Buselt C,. . 82-9 -. Disposition: Unfounded ".1" Puppy advertised listed for $15 rather than S20 actual fee & her son not allowed to leave to obtain additional money. ~,. 1,;, ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5/25/82 82-10 Disposition: Unfounded Officer rude, threatening & angry manner used when approaching complainant. -~ ':0 I, ~" rj 8-12-82 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Officer used profanity when arresting complainant's daughter. Also pulled her hair to take her out of the patrol car. 82-11 Disposition: Sustained 9-28-82 Shari Stein ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 82-12 Disposition: Sustained 10-6-82 Joann Foulk 82-13 Disposition: Sustained Advised complainant an injured dog would be picked up and then failed to do 50. Poor judgement on part of officer - asking complainant's daughter if he knew a woman who used to live in area & showing complainant's daughter photographs of supposed sex deviate. 11-29-82 Shirley Ann Rasmussen ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ ". , 82-14 Disposition: Unfounded Complainant treated unusually rough . manner by officer, handled the matter unprofessionally & officer laughed and joked about the incident in her presence. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 11-8-82 Teresa Bell Off-duty conduct of officer regarding complainant's son. 82-15 Disposition: Sustained - WA '3 - {~ 1 12-2-82 Mrs. Rhonda Tamayo 575-8 Otay Lakes Rd. CV 421-0953 82-16 Disposition: Sustained - WA "",,'t'i' Violation of conduct by officer while in uniform ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3 -/1 7-18-70 Dispostion: COMPLAINTS FOR 1970-1980 Barbara Arasmi th Unlawful search and rudeness a Sustained 6-10-74 Excessive force 8-19-74 Disposition: Not sustained Excessive force Dispositon: 8-29-77 Dispositon: 3-28-79 Dispositon: 9-15-79 Disposition: 7-28-80 Disposition: James Brennan Not sustained Officer would listen to complaint Not sustained Connie Ballew Excessive force Not sustained Abusive towards citizen Unfounded _Bill leatherberrili ... 1.1.. Officer is having affair with complainants daughter Unfounded 3-j,P COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item~ Meeting Date 3/30/93 ITEM TITLE: Resolution Ii 0 S 3 Approving the filing of three applications for Transportation Enhancement Activities Program Funds under the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) of 1991 and designating the City Engineer as the authorized representative for this program SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public Works~ r,/' REVIEWED BY: City Manage? (4/Sths Vote: Yes_No X) The Transportation Enhancement Activities Program was enacted as part of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (IS TEA) of 1991. California is scheduled to receive more than $200 million over a six-year period (6 cycles) under this program. Projects must be directly connected to the transportation system and should also provide maximum enhancement to the environments and communities. This resolution will approve the filing of three applications for first cycle funding. The application is for: 1) Capital Improvement Project (CIP) No. PR-153 which involves the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle trail and path along Sweetwater Road and Willow Street across the Chula Vista Golf Course and over the Sweetwater River, 2) Proposed CIP for FY 93-94 involving the installation of sidewalk improvements along both sides of Third Avenue between Orange Avenue and Main Street; and 3) Proposed CIP for FY 93-94 involving the installation of sidewalk improvements along the east side of Fourth Avenue between Orange Avenue and Anita Street. RECOMMENDATION: That City Council approve the resolution as stated above. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: In late 1991, Congress drafted and the President signed into law the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA). A component of ISTEA is the Transportation Enhancement Activities Program, a 10% set aside from the Surface Transportation Program funding category. Transportation enhancement activities are a means of more creatively and sensitively integrating transportation facilities into their surrounding communities. Over the six-year life of the act, over $200 million in Transportation Enhancement Activities Funds (TEA) are apportioned to California. Each year funding is considered to be one program cycle. Caltrans is emphasizing projects that can be implemented in FY 93-94 for this first cycle. Ll-I Page 2, Item~ Meeting Date 3/30/93 We will be holding on projects that cannot be implemented that quickly for the second cycle. The application process for the second cycle will begin this summer. Candidate projects for cycle 2 may include segments of the Bay Route Bikeway. However, this will be done following adequate coordination with SANDAG which is the lead agency for said bikeway. TEA monies must be matched at approximately 88 Federal dollars to 12 non-Federal dollars. These are reimbursable Federal aid monies subject to all the requirements of Title 23, United States Code and related Federal and State laws. The California Department of Transportation (CalTrans) has established the procedures and criteria for reviewing proposals. Said procedures and criteria established by CalTrans require application approval by the applicant's governing body. Following approval of this resolution, Engineering staff will submit the complete application package to SANDAG. SANDAG's role is to evaluate each application based on said procedures and to complete its evaluation process by developing a regional priority list by late May. Action is currently scheduled for the May 28 SANDAG Board of Directors meeting. The regional priorities will then be submitted to the California Transportation Commission for final adoption of the first cycle of the subject program at their August 4, 1993 meeting. The application contains assurances that we must comply with and if selected we will need to enter into an agreement with the State of California to carry out the Transportation Enhancement Activities Project. Transportation enhancement activities must meet three basic criteria, based on instruction from the Federal Highway Administration: a. Enhancement activities are over and above normal transportation projects. Typically, a normal transportation project includes mitigation, standard landscaping, other permit requirements and provisions negotiated as a condition of obtaining a permit for a transportation project for a normal [non-enhancement] transportation project. b. Project must have a direct relationship to the intermodal transportation system, which consists of all forms of transportation in a unified, interconnected manner. This relationship may be one of function, proximity, or impact. For example, a bikeway is afunctional component of the intermodal transportation system. Removal of outdoor advertising in the viewshed of a highway is justified in light of its proximity. Water pollution control alongside an existing highway to protect or improve a drinking water supply would qualify based on the impact of the highway in terms of water pollution. c. Projects must be selected from one or more of the 10 activities categories eligible to be accounted for as transportation enhancement activities. They are: 1. Provision of facilities for pedestrians and bicycles. 2. Acquisition of scenic easements and scenic or historic sites. It-2.. Page 3, Item!:l.-- Meeting Date 3/30/93 3. Scenic or historic highway programs. 4. Landscaping and other scenic beautification. 5. Historic preservation. 6. Rehabilitation and operation of historic transportation buildings, structures or facilities (including historic railroad facilities and canals). 7. Preservation of abandoned railway corridors (including the conversion and use thereof for pedestrian or bicycle trails). 8. Control and removal of outdoor advertising. 9. Archaeological planning and research. 10. Mitigation of water pollution due to highway runoff. This resolution will approve the filing of three applications: 1) Capital Improvement Project (Project No. PR-153) which involves the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle trail and path along Sweetwater Road and Willow Street across the Chula Vista Golf Course and over the Sweetwater River. The project will provide connections to pedestrians/ jogging trails and bikeways in the Bonita area, will revegetate portions of the river floodway and will clean up a mosquito infested drainage channel. The total project cost is $318,000. The Transportation Enhancement Activities portion of the project as presented in the application is estimated to cost $128,800. Current funding for this project as shown in the CIP comes from two sources: Transportation Development Act (TDA) funds- $145,000, and Golf Course revenues - $108,750, which brings total current funding to $253,750, and results in a funding shortfall of $64,250. If this application is approved by the California Transportation Commission and if the City of Chula Vista receives full funding under this program, surplus funds up to $108,750 will be used to reimburse the Golf Course Revenue Account. 2) Proposed CIP for FY 93-94 involving the construction of sidewalk improvements along both sides of Third A venue between Orange Avenue and Main Street. The total project cost is $173,000. We have also submitted an application for TDA funds for this project. The ability to implement this project depends upon funding approval under either program. 4-3 Page 4, Iteml Meeting Date 3/30/93 3) Proposed CIP for FY 93-94 involving the construction of sidewalk improvements along the east side of Fourth Avenue between Orange Avenue and Anita Street. The total project cost is $63,000. We have also submitted an application for IDA funds for this project. The ability to implement this project depends upon funding approval under either program. As indicated above, we also looked at submitting the acquisition of the abandoned rail line for the Bay Route Bikeway as a project and discussed it with SANDAG, which is the lead agency. SANDAG indicated that they have already discussed acquiring the rail line right-of-way with MTDB. SANDAG staff advised us that MTDB would not sell the right-of-way because MTDB is looking at a project to run an excursion train over the tracks. SANDAG staff also indicated that they are putting in an application for the Sweetwater section of this bike route under Cycle 1. FISCAL IMPACT: Potential total revenues to the City of $364,800. The actual amount is dependent upon which projects are approved for funding by the California Transportation Commission. SMN/Filc: KY-026, KY-036, PR-153 WPC F:\HOME\ENGINEER\AOENDA\ISTEA..APP 031993 L{~ l{ RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING THE FILING OF THREE APPLICATIONS FOR TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT ACTIVITIES PROGRAM FUNDS UNDER THE INTERMODAL SURFACE TRANSPORTATION EFFICIENCY ACT (ISTEA) OF 1991 AND DESIGNATING THE CITY ENGINEER AS THE AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE FOR THIS PROGRAM WHEREAS, the Transportation Enhancement Activities Program was enacted as part of the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) of 1991; and WHEREAS, California is scheduled to receive more than $200 million over a six-year period (6 cycles) under this program; and WHEREAS, proj ects must be directly connected to the transportation system and should also provide maximum enhancement to the environments and communities; and WHEREAS, staff recommends the filing of three applications for first cycle funding for: 1) Capital Improvement Project (CIP) No. PR-153 which involves the construction of a pedestrian/bicycle trail and path along Sweetwater Road and Willow Street across the Chula vista Golf Course and over the Sweetwater River, 2) proposed CIP for FY '93-'94 involving the installation of sidewalk improvements along both sides of Third Avenue between Orange Avenue and Main Street and 3) proposed CIP for FY 93-94 involving the installation of sidewalk improvements along the east side of Fourth Avenue between Orange Avenue and Anita Street. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the city of Chula vista does hereby approve the filing of three applications for Transportation Enhancement Activities Program Funds under the Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act (ISTEA) of 1991 and designating the City Engineer as t e authorized representative for this program. '"Xf< Presented by John P. Lippitt, Director of Public Works F:\home\attorney\670.93 4-5 Tl'llnsportlltion Enhancement Activities (TEA) Application Form GENERAL INFORMATION 1'93-94Vear Proposed Propo.al has .rtes in more than one RTPA. Proposal i. entirety wi1hin the RTP A. Propo.al i. statewide or mu"i"~ional in scope, and has no geollraphic 'home'. TEA PROJECT NAME: Sidewalk Installation - on Fourth Avenue south of OranRe Avenue IP Code-Phone) l!l..rt F'llure. .n current year dolla... TEA PORTION OF PROJECT S 55.000 NON.FEDERAl. MATCH (SOURCE) S 8.000 City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 (619) 691-5021 TOTAl. PROJECT COST I h':t non D o Proposed tranlPortation enhancement activity will be scored in mil of the followinll divisions. Fill out and include the palle i!ldicated: Iia 1. BicYCle, Pedestrian, Abandoned Rail Right of Way (Page 4L) 0 3. Transportation Aesthetics and Scenic Values (Page 4c.) o 2. Historic/Archaeological (Page 4b.) 0 4. Water Pollution Due to Hillhway Runoff. (Pall' 4d.) Transportallon Enhancement ActlYlty Project Representatrve (Name. We, phone) Person With day.to.day responSlb,iny for proJ'ct (n drffer.nt from project represent.lIve) (Name. title. phone) Shale Hanson Civil Engineer (619) 691-5114 Shale Hanson Civil Engineer (619) 691-5114 3RIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED TRANSPORT ATION ENHANCEMENT ACTIVITIES (not to exceed 60 words) This project will provide a missing segment of sidewalk along the east side of Fourth Avenue between Anita Street and a point approximately 500 feet south of Orange Avenue. This sidewalk along with the associated curb, gutter and pavement will enhance the neighborhood. CEDERAl. ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE FOR TEA PROJECT (check proposed type and status.) Type: _Ne9"lrve Decls..llon Status: _____Complete Project will be exempt. '\lame of Lead Agency _Calegori..1 EI_ploon _Envi_ntallmpact Slata",.nt _In Progress A!lticipated Compl'liO!l Dale _Not Started City of Chula Vista ..........,:-01'''' Ja!luary 22. 1993 ~ 4/..., Page 1 Include this page in each lIPPlicatio!l. , . y' INFORMATION REQUIRED TO ADDRESS SCREENING CRITERIA If any of the applicable screening critaria below are not met, the proposal will not be ranked or evaluated any further, A "no" answer to anv of th, followino ou@!~tion!!l imrT'lAdiat@/v disouBlrfie.s the DroDo~81: ,. 1$ the project eligible for Transportation Enhancements funding: liiI Ves o No a.. RELATIONSHIP TO INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION SVSTEM --1L-Fu~ion -1LProximity Impact Snafly explain direct relatIonship to transportatIon system. (How does the proposed actlVny enhanceth.transportation .ystem?) The proposed sidewalk will provide a route for students,as well as other pedestr~ans/between 1 a 001 and the new lt~rar. It will rovide connections to a bus constructed at the north. end of the project. Also, the additional pavement will b. OVER AND ABOVE NORMAL PROJECT Ii1l Ves 0 No (If the activity is mentioned in an environmantal document as a required m~igation. or If the activity is requirad by permitting agencies to proceed with another project, this activity is not OVer and above a "normel" project.) _3. Scenic or historic highway programs. c. WHICH CATEGORV OR CATEGORIES ENCOMPASS THE TEA? (May be more than one.) --L.'. Provision of facil~ies for pedestrians and bicycles. _6. Rehabil~ation and operation of historic transportation buildings, structures or facil~ies (including historic railroad facilities and canals). _7. Preservation of abandoned railway corridors (including the conversion and use thereof for pedestrian or bicycle trails). Control and removal of outdoor advertising. Archaeological planning and research. _'0. M~igation of water pollution due to highway runoff. _8. _9. _2. Acquisition of scenic easements and scenic or historic sites. _4. Landscaping and other scenIC beaut~ication. _5. Historic preservation. 2. Is the project consistent (or "not inconsistent") wrthfedaral. state. regional or local land use end regional transportation plans, goals and policies? 19 Ves 0 No Please describe the plans used in evaluating consistency: Chula Vista General Plan 3. Is the project finencially viable? rn Ves 0 No (The goveming body will be required to submit a resolution to this effect If the project is selected by the Regional Transportation Planning Agency.) 4. Is this project well-defined. well-just~ied. and ready-to-go in the year proposed? E]: Ves 0 No Please desCribe any evidence supporting this statement. The City is prepared to design and construct this facility in Fiscal Year 1993-94 if funding becomes available. aVes' o No 5. Does the project improve air quality or does ~ have e neutral eir qualrty impact? Pleese describe any evidence supporting this conclusion. As a non-motorized facility, it would encourage people to walk instead of drive. 6. Is the project as proposed in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act? What evidence is there to support this claim? (Please Describe) This project will comply with all ADA requirements and be accessable to everyone. aVes o No o Not ~plicable 7. For archaeology and historic preservalion projects, is the proposal in compliance with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Archaeological and Historic Preservation? 0 Ves 0 No 0 Not ~plicable Please describe any evidence available to support this claim. .....1Ofl Form January 22. '993 ~ &.1..'7 , Page 2 Include thl. page in Nch application. INFORMATION REQUIRED TO ADDRESS SCORING CRJJERIA 1. R.oion.r and Communftv ~nh.ne.~nt (Maximum 50 points) Please explain Ih. activity's primary .ff.cts . b int.nt and purpose . on Ih. following .I.menls: a. How does Ih. project ifT1)rov. ov.rall quality-of.m.. community. anellor .nvironment ? (10 pOlnls) It ~rovide a safe, clean and attractive route for the students and other pedestrians going -fOtlie library. C. Describ. how Ih. activity incraas.s acc.ss 10 activity c.nl.... such as businasHs. schools. recreational ar... and shopping areas. Do.s Ih. propos.d project connect Iransponation modes. or does Ih. activity h.v. (lti..r mufti-modalaspects? Do.s thtl proj.ct r.inforc. or cOfT1)lement the r.gionallransponation syst.m. or fill s d.fici.ncy in the syst.m? (Maximum 8 poinfa) The project will provide pedestrian access and improved bicycle access to the new library hein~ rnn!=;t"TI1C"tpn Tt' tAd11 pT'n,rirl&:> ~ mic::c:.ing 1;"11- ;1"1 t-'h.o r;f-r'~ po..:r""f't-Y"~~.... .......tu""...t.. " c. D.scrib. how activity ifT1)l.menls goals in the r.gionallransponation plan. or olh.r adopted f.deral. stal.. or local pians. (Max. 8 points) This project will implement the City's goal of providing sidewalk along all public streets, especially connecting activity centers. c. Pleas. .xplain the d.gree to whICh the project increas.s evailability or .wareness of histonc. community. visual or natural r.sourc.s. (Maximum 8 pOints) These improvements will enhance the character of the neighborhood and improve the sense of community. · Pleas. describe evidence of degree of regional or community suppon and summarize Ihat suppon below. (Maximum .8 points) The students from Montgomery Elementary School and residents south of Orange Avenue want to use a sjdew~lk to rp~('h thp l;h,..~,..y :. ~ the project encompasses more than one of the activny.specihc divisions. explain. (proJeclS can score in only one oflhe activity. spacKIC divisions below) (Maximum 8 pOints) N/A 2. Cost EHKtiv@nlua/Rl!..onable Coat (Maximum 10 points) What IS the anticipated hfe 01 the facility or product resulting from Ihls proJ.ct In years? -2l... years. What IS the total capna! cost of the project? $ 63,000 . Please indicate where you beheve Ihe project lalls on the following leale: Please explain your answer. showing any calculations of b.nehts in [curT.ntl dollar terms. It will be a very effective way to save lives along a busy street Highly Cost-effective R.asonable Cost or Moderately Cost-effective Low Cost-effectIVeness Not Cost-el1ectivelNot Applicable I!I o o o 3. Proiecl Need (5 points) Ar. the .nhancements proposed threatened. or will an opponunny be losl rt lhe proj.ct is not funded? Pi.... .xplaln the spacific threats or opponunities losl. No enhancements will be made if the nroiect is not funded. S Ves o No 4. Ae1ivitv.SDeeifie Enhaneemenl Divisions (40 points) Project can 1IC0r. in only .QD1 ollhe following activrty.spacdic divisions. in wnlCh category should Ihis proposal be eveluated? Select only .QD1: !Xl 1. Bicycle. Pedestrian. Abandon.d Rai! Right of Way o 2. Historic/Archaeological o o 3. Transponalion A.sth.tics and Scanic Values 4. Wat.r Pollution Due 10 Highwey Runoff. Plaas. answer questions for the selected division. Only includ. thaI Division page in the application. .-...... January 22. 1993 ~ Page 3 Include thi. page in each application. &.I" , Division 1 1. Bicycle. Pedeatrian or Abandoned Rail Right-of.Way Propoule: a. What is tha need for the proposed activity? Plaase spacify high, medium. or low and axplain your answer. For axa~le. is there a shortage of pedestrian or bicycle facilnies available? Is there a missing link in connaeling the intermedel system; how important is rt? How necessary are new lacilities serving the system? (Maximum 20 points) There is a shortage of sidewalks in having a high need for sidewalks. unsafe pedestrian route. this neighborhood. Fourth Avenue is a major road The high speed and volume of ttaffic provides an Sidewalks have been installed to the south and around the elementary school. are also being installed at Fourth and Orange as part of the library project. project will connect these sidewalk facilities, filling a missing link. Sidewalks This Also, Fourth Avenue will become the City's major north/south bicy~le route. The additional pavement provided by this project will make for a safer bike route. b. How well does the proposal meet or address the opportunnies and/or needs for bicycie or pedestrian facilities? (Maximum 20 points) This project will enhance the community's image and provide a safe route for students, as well as other pedestrians, as they walk to the library. ~callOn ForTT'l January 22. 1993 M ~..'1 Page 4a Include one diviaion page in the application. ASSURANCES CommrtmenVPrior Commrtmen1: Has the implemenhng agency or project sponsor cartified that rt is willing and able to maintain an, ':>erate tha project' aVes o No Please describe the best evidence of the cartification available. If none is available, when can one be provided? Project sponsor possesses legal authority to nominate transportation enhancement activity and to financa, acquire, and construct the proposed project; and by formal action (e.g.. e resolution) the sponsoring agency's governing body authorizes the nomination of the transportation enhancement activity, including all understanding and assurances contained therein, and authorizas the person identified as the official representative of the sponsor to act in connection with the nomination and to provide such additional information as may be required. Project sponsor will maintain and operate the property acquired, developed, rehabilrtated, or restored with the funds for the lifa of the resurtant facility(ies) or activity. Wrth the approval of the California Department of Transportation,the applicant or rts successors "'terast in the property may transfer the responsibility to maintain and operate the property. Project sponsor will give the California Department of Transportation's representative access to and the right to examine all records, books, papers, or documents related to the transportation enhancement activity. Project sponsor Will cause work on the project to be commenced within a reasonable time after receipt of notificahon fro", me State that funds have been approved by the Federal Highway Administration end that the project will be carried to complehon with reasoc - 'ie diligence. Project sponsor will comply where applicable with provisions of the Califomia Environmental Quality Act, the National E,. ,oomental Policy Act, the Americans wrth Disabilities Act, the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservahon, and any other federal, state, and/or local laws, rules and/or regulations. I certify that the information contained in this transportation enhancement activity nomination, including required attachments, is aocurate and that I have read and understand the import am infomnation and agree to the assurances on this form. Signed Date (TEA Sponsor's Authorized Representative as shown In Resolution) Printed (Name and Title) Clifford L. Swanson Deputy Public Works Director/City Engineer ....lCII'Ion Fer"" January 22, 1993 ~ .....10 Page 5 Include this page In ....h appliclllion. z o ~ et U ::; a.. a.. et C/) W ~ - > ~ U et !z wc/) :!iW wC/) UZ ZW eta.. :>< ZW W..J z:$ oU -z ~et .-~ a::LL. 0.- c..U C/)w za eta:: f:c.. l/l c: :3 ..J o Q M en , N en en ... > u. Q w .... e( ..J U. Z Z :;:, l/l e( l/l c: :3 ..J o Q ..J ..J e( > e( ..J ~ l/l 5 .:.: z e( o ::i ~ ~ e( o .... w .... o z tJ) W tJ) Z W Q. >< W ~ o w -, o a: Q. -oJ < ~ - Q. < o -oJ -oJ < .t ill ... o ~g: ~'..' .,.".:;;. "At'- .,J.. '.1 ..> }':::'u.. ;.,,::~~""" .:t ::;;:":]1 :(:>~ "~ .~ '" .'/.... .~ ~ ... ...g .- .> 'u. );i :,;},..., }#{;:' ..:'';'';-"",' }':"~:. :~:/"" .",,':.... >ffi ~.~ 'd'~ '::_, ::;;;:~: :t~:} I S~ I~ :~:~~t_... ~ ~ ..... . CD g - ! , 00 ~ 00 .: ~ i I i I i I I I , J I I I tit I I I tit o o o ...., '" tit tit tit I I I I , I i , I I I , I i I ! i , i tit tit I , , , . I I i I I , i j tit I tit 000 0 0 000 0 ",",0 ~ ~ ~i ...., '" ... ! I ... W s:- Ul u. C (j ~ ~ W a: Ul i}J iOiCt c. _ZWW c a:O:e:z: Z WI=c.1- C wiii50 Z ~-ow 52 ClSWUl Ul ffiuw~ WZZCUlU coo>-ca: Cll=l=cn~ ~uu!ta:c. a:~~lL~a: l:fja:a: I"!c. 0 zt;t;~ww -ZZ:z:UlUl Cl ClCC zoo _ w.w wuua:...I...I Ul w I! w c. >c w I- u W ... o a: c. ...I ~ C. C U ...I C b t- ~ e. w lJ t Ii! "' - ~ !1 - "'" fI') .....- ., _ ..- _ _ ;:: = .. ~ &4"'" l- t.) ...JW ~a 011: ~I).. >0. Il. C. z,.. ~'I ID... tJ) . . w .... tJ) -i z -.. w .t Q. (/) >< a: W ~ :3 .- ell ell .J .. 0 () t 0 W M -:l Cl'l . 0 III N Z Cl'l a: i 0 Cl'l .- Q. ell - .. I- > :.t < U. " 0 0 z - W ..J I- - Q. :3 ~ ;,; Q. ell < U. . ell Z a: ~~ en Z W t W - ;:) Q. " t: (/) 0 > < - (/) ..J I- , 0 a: ..J < :3 < I- .J 0 . Z &:, wen 0 : ::EW .J jCll .J ."w Wen < :.~U') OZ .~ z > .;..w ZW :3 ~I).. <Q. -I< XX CL. i~ ZW (/) .-t.) w..J is ~'W "'a zS .. .. l- . z'lI: 00 Z ;<1).. -z < 7.' Cl 1-< (.) 'c:.z ~~ ::i !:~ CL. ",c a:LL. CL. .'.11: 01- < ,,'W ;"0. Q.O 0 :11'0 enw I- \;I:.J Z!") ~...J W 'tc <0 l5 a;; a: a: I-Q. z o ... ... ... ...i ... o I ...1 z 0" CIl~~ !I!:fd I=CIlI).. ciZ!!l. a:-a: ~~w ocj: o ~:. ;: ~ ~ ;:. ;:1 o ... tit tit ... ... o ... CIl w !2 w I).. I< W i 1= c II: ~ o ...J ~ e Ii:: 1);7 ,.,. "12,.. ! fI '" ~ &! .. ~ Il!S U) W 0 - :IE C:C ~a: O~ U)~ CJ~ (/) Z15 a: _ c :5 C~ ..I ZC 0 ~~ 0 LLf3 M a> ::> , CJiil z N a> Z~ 0 a> - .... - c I- > I-Z et u. <~ 0 0 c:~ - W ..J Wi: e.. .... e.. :5 C,.a: LlJ et u. Oi: z (/) Z ..Je. W ~ :;) ..J - (/) < 2:(/) < I-W (/) 00 a: eta: :5 I-=> ..I zO 0 W(/) 0 :lEe" ..I ..I Wz < 0- ZC > etZ < ..I :I:=> Q. zu. (/) W..J is zS .:.: 00 z -Z < I-et 0 ~~ :i Q. a:u. Q. 01- < e..U 0 (/)W .... Z-, w etO .... a: a: 0 I-e.. z I~I I , t i ; 0 0 .JLlJ 0 ~a 100 i , - oa: ! 00 ~Q. tit , , tit ... I i -- c" I ~i I >- ~~ tit tit .Ia I 'i I I . ",- I ~ tit tit , I ! i I 8l I 1 - I ~ "I i ! I i tit , '" I i 1 , I - I I I , ~ I , ...' I tit I I 101 I '-cy; I I 'i 0 I Ig, 0 0 I I -I - - 00 ~ 00, tit, I 1 , ... I I i a:C I 00 III OLlJ I I .... ~S~ .... , ..... I ~ - ;;;!::IE = ~-:E 0 C c:IEO u '6 ~:Eu . c C OOZ I '" := ZU::> , I . .... .-., 1 I I i E .. I I 001 i .. = c' , e " Cl. -~, "-' - ~ III '! ~ 1! , . .r" ..... := I -3 ..c .... 3- u !! .... I .. ~ ';:~c" '" ~ : E3 - 'LlJ cii 'I: I ..I ~u W ... Cl. I - "~ U N = CJ - , -. ":0 a: - Ii I z f.'~i ::> ~I s:1 ;: .;: 6 0 ~ Z I/) ~I 131 .... ! ~ --'i CJ t3 t3 i Z 1/): W' ~I w t; _.~ 2i -, a..! a.. z ..II 1/)' I/) W -t ctl - ~I - a . :::l a:i ~I a: .-w ~ WI I W , a: - .-a ..I QI S a.. ..I WI ~I 91 I .. ..f c ...., Ill' ..I , i :! '-~ + ':~::J ~ I/) e ~'. '-c ::; f;: . ",<- -Nj:l.."':e.....l/:O-N ....'" '" .,;'.:-. NN NN NN f')f'tf") ...... .. :I ~ iI w ~ ~ ~ ,:.) ~. ~'13 z o ~ < o - -' CL CL < en W ~ ~> ~a: Oct ~::E Z::E W~ ~CI) O..J ~ct ::c- zO wZ zct QZ ~- <u. ~t- a:O ~~ en-, ZO <a: f=c.. ~ ..(,) ""'~ Si ~~ ~ O' ~!; ~'i 111_ VI a: :3 ...I o Q CO) en . (II en en .... :g _ i - .,. ~ > LI. Q w I- :3 LI. Z Z ;:) VI C( VI a: :3 ...I o Q ...I ...I C( > C( ...I Cl. VI is .:: z C( (.) ::; Cl. Cl. C( o I- W b z x :.i - '. ~ . . , ,'" ' i~ _.... i-:~~ -- -.j.~); ~::I"-Ct ;.~c --':1/ ~-'~2 '..= ":;-:cn .,.~ ~.c .0 Z "C ;:z ;;;::It <<;~ .(,) ..>W ,., '7::0 ~.~ f,!.... jii .. 00 0 0 o 0 0 o 0 0 . . ""' ""' <Xl '" '" .... .... .... .... .... .... i - ~ .... .... .... ! . In S - ~ I tilt !.. .... ..... 00 0 o 0 o 0 ""' ""' '" '" .... .... - o N -'" N l: - ..- ",=- l:C/) .- UJ- ;.U)~ C/)ZCI> WWl: C/)~= ZX+ WW,... ~~M Xo ~W ..~ 0"';' WOC/) ':)a:W O~C/) a:ClZ ~Zw ...I....~ <:;eX ~a:W il:w~ C~o oO~ ...1...10 <<a: ~~~ ~~<l ~ ".0 ......... o o o . .... "" "" I .... .... .... .... .... .... o o o . o o o "" "" 1 .... <Xl .... - .. M '" l: :::; - - '" M '" ~ ..EO ...IZ CO.!! i I.. o e- ... ... u If. c.-:~ ...I I - <lEi u... II :l I- ... Dl a:.c o ,-;; :t.!c C/) i-= t OJ ~ W c- aJ~ a: 'I: !!2 Cl. ~ g ...IS"'" < ""'''' ~ E l!! ~ Cl. e ~ III '" ...I - Cl Z is Z ;:) u... ~ o W a a: ~ ~ ~ i - ... l' '1 o -b g ~:II:! .; ....0 "" o'f .... ~,~ r ....~ w.. Ill.._ ... ~~ ~--~.I ;:::~ ... .,.. 'l:':- .0' Ii ~J ~:,~ I' ~ ... ,;,,:; 'i'" ....' z:..~... -~ .... ~:-:-: I~t g i~i ~ ...,'- Irl ...~.~ Y'- LL. .. - .. 11 if' ': a: 6 't:~~; ~ ~ ~ :t'.,<,; Z :: '5=: 7.:::) '" ~ ;e..... (1)- ~~ Q It- k"'l,' W 0 ~ . .~ ~ en 0 .-"" en ~ ~ ~ __WO Iili ~d\: 5 ~ ~ a 1P..,k-WO", . ...;;:~ a: a: a: :; t~ ~ ~ ~ ~ i..eel! 1t.,..... z w ~ ~..::.;.. ::) :i 1= ~ .-- Ll. < CI) I- '~ -' 0 in a: .... ,.." < ~ ~ ....~ . en ~ CI) J:A~- ~~; e j: ~! f: '1'-1. :E < a: " o a: A. en ~ a: W Q Z ::) Ii; w ::) o w a: " Z - Q Z ::) Ll. f: .. 1::: I " '" u t; ~ I File No. KY -036 CITY OF CHUU VISTA ENGINEERING DIVISION ENGINEER'S ESTIMATE PROJECT TITLE: Construction of 925' of Sidewalk and Associated Curb, Gutter, and Pavement - East Side of Fourth Avenue - An~a Street to Proposed Ubrary S~e DATE: JAN 8, 1993 PREPARED BY: M J I CHECKED BY: S M N INO. I I1EM QUAN1TJ'Y; UNIT: UNIT PRICE AMOUNT i 1 i GRADING ITEMS 500 CY $15.00 $7,500 I 2 I BASE 205 CY $16.00 $3,280 I 3 lAC PAVEMENT AND SURFACE IMPROVEMENTS 205 TON $40.00 i $8,200 !i , 4: SIDEWALK. CURB, AND GUTTER 925 LFI $22.00 , $20,350 !i , I I I. 5 ,TRAFFIC CONTROL LS . LS $5,000.00 , $5,000 " 6, WHEELCHAIR RAMP 1 EA $700.00 , $700 II i' 0 I: I , i SUBTOTAL $45,030 I I, I SAY $45,000 I , I COt-.'TINGENCIES SUBTOTAL (25 %) $11,250 ENGINEERlNG SUBTOTAL (15 % ~ $6,750 PROJECT TOTAL $63,000 I: (IDASW4TH) +t ,6 If-IS' - \ . ~.. u, - _.\ ,,', "\\~,hi,~\fM':~~ - ~- ~ _ \. r ,rr ~':;:\ -..;... ;::'. ".;,,-_..~ ~~ JG! ~21TI~ ~ '.. ~ll ' [D..Ll'r I. ~ _ ......;.'. ~'. ,1 \" , -.: . j8!. ':. \ W >"-'- ) . ~ J.\- .I.... . ,.., .-' " ~ r- ..,... ,'I--'"" -- ~ '-N g ~, \ :11 ...."; \~ 'r--- J;~ \r Ul 1\. .... l ...I.~".. 0 . ".':.i8 ., ......' ~ ;0: .:.-...... ~ '....... I~' :~]........ h ',,~ \1 '~:\~-Ir ~.:~.:.:.... 112. ~ ::;...l_.~::..~. .........1 \\\~\~ Ihso-,.:,. ":'",....\\ n ~ ---. c\ \:j,t:~l"" T '. ,'~"~_ ..., .-,' ".:...'.\...- l ~ _~~,_ '" r.......... .' 1'\\f .r:: t: "'" h, . I . t:: " . . . Pi / III J r-<. oo:~:: H . j=., t= . : ..... .., ,,11'>-..\...t..L '- i ~lilill iI '._ ~~i,,, [~r-r : - Om, //1 J,--...... ," _ ~I- t'fr=.: ANITA : STREET. . C.o"....." .'''' . , ,,,, ='_'" .i! . ..:.1111'1/..] _....... .~ ; . _ ...'....!'. J I JJIJI UlJa I!lj . . == ."." 1_ ~ ..t iJm3' .0.. - '0" : -l1J.f'I'1 == 1/'1 II "i~I.' '- ! L!J . E!Iif!ffi1' ,.--'1111/11IJIII 1 11111/1 ...:--~If?"....t liJU'\' r7 ~f- I I [r I I;; '. : =:;. -=:::;:. IU'':II "I- ~~. -o""r'O"(lh '~1JJ_/Jlllf;rl'~~._ . . Zt- ;;Jj;, ill: !I II 1/ ~r/JJ II I IV l'1i~(1I [C'.. 1111/1 =- ,..,": 'II, "'~ , ~ Wi . .ql, HI: II III C),GI; ;I '''" . "" !i!!IC!Tl Ir3rrC!IImrlli!I1i',:..",ry , '''ii. .. ":..... .:.. I!! ,UJII1ij c::m lll'I=rrrJ IJ"" "Cl "" ,,,. . .. , .i : i : MAiN '. \\,: ~"'!I/I/ smE" '~" t.. "., . \\: I=";'i .i i !!,wJ;mi: ., ........... .....\\\... or-- I . :....;._~. .' '--~. : . :0... ..' 1.... Project Location: II....... , ~ATE: 01/08/93 JtRO~EC'r tJtITLE SIDEWALK INSTALLATION ON FOURTH AVENUE, SOUTH OF ORANGE AVENUF: ~JUoWN BY: A. Stevens II - ~ ...". I.f .../~ Transportation Enhancement Activities (TEA) Application Form GENERAL INFORMATION y 93-94 Year Proposed Proposal has sites in more than one RTPA. X Proposal is entirety within the RTPA. Proposal is statewide or muiti-regional in scope, and has no geographic 'home'. TEA PROJECT NAME: Bicycle/iogging trail - along Sweetwater Road and Willow Street. PROJECT SPONSOR (Agency -- Address - ZIP Code-Phone) City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 Insert Figures .n current year dollars. TEA PORTION OF PROJECT S 128.800 NON-FEDERAL MATCH (SOURCE) S 189,200 TOTAL PROJECT COST S II ROOD o TEA is a stand-alona project. rn1 Proposed transportation enhancement activity will be scored in .llD.e. of the following divisions. Fill out and include the page indicated: GI ,. Bicycle, Pedestrian, Abandoned Rail Right of Way (Page 4a. ) o 2. Historic/Archaeological (Page 4b.) o 3. Transportation Aesthetics and Scenic Values (Page 4c.) o 4. Water Pollution Due to Highway Runoff. (Page 4d.) Transportation Enhancement ActiVity Project Representative (Name. title, phone) Person with day-to.day responsibility for prolect (it different from project representative) (Name. title, phone) Alex AI-Agha Ci vll Engineer (619) 691-5179 Alex AI-Agha Civil Engineer (619) 691-5179 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROPOSED TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT ACTIVITIES (not to exceed 60 words) This project will construct a pedestrian/bicycle trail across the Sweetwater River that will provide a safe crossing parallel to the very busy and narrow Willow Street bridge. It will provide connections to pedestrian/jogging trails and bikeways in the valley, will revegetate portions of the river floodway, and will clean up a mosquito infested drainage channel. FEDERAL ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE FOR TEA PROJECT (check proposed type and status.) Type: Status: -LNegative Oedaration _Categorical Exemphon _Environmental Impact Statement ....x....Complete _In Progress Anticipated Completion Date _Not Started Name of Lead Agency City of Chula Vista AOCIiICatD'lForm January 22. '993 ~ Page' Include this page in Nch application. 1.("'7 INFORMATION REQUIRED TO ADDRESS SCREENING CRITERIA H any of the applicable screening cr~eria below are not met, the proposal will not be ranked or evaluated any further. A "no" answer to anv of th, followino auestions immedi2ltelv disoU8iifilU the DroDosal: 1. Is the project eligible for Transportation Enhancements funding: tll Ves o No a. RELATIONSHIP TO INTERMODAL TRANSPORTATION SVSTEM ~Function _Proximity X Impact Briefly explain direct relationship to transportation system. (How does the proposed activity enhance the transportation system?) See attached sheet b. OVER AND ABOVE NORMAL PROJECT IX! Ves 0 No (If the aclivity is mentioned in an environmental document as a required m~igation, or H the activity is required by permitting agencies to proceed ~h another project. this activity is not over and above a "normal" project.) c. WHICH CATEGORV OR CATEGORIES ENCOMPASS THE TEA? (May be more than one.) -1L-.1. Provision of facil~ies for pedestrians and bicycles. _6. Rehabil~ation and operetion of historic transportation buildings, structures or facil~ies (including historic railroad facilities and canals). _2. ACCluisition of scenic easements and scenic or histor~ sites. _3. Scenic or historic highway programs. _7. Preservation of abandoned railway corridors (including the conversion and use thereof for pedestrian or bicycle trails). _6. Control and removal of outdoor advertising. _9. Archaeological planning and research. _10. Miligation of water pollution due to highway runoff. ....lL- 4. Landscaping and other scenic beautnlcalion. _5. Historic preservation. 2. Is the project consistent (or "not inconsistent") wilh federal. state. regional or local land use and regional transportation plans, goals and policies? fi Ves 0 No Please de,scribe the plans used in evaluating consistency: Chula Vista General Plan; Chula Vista Bicycle Facility Plan; SANDAG Re~ional Bicycle Corridor 3. Is the project financially viable? !XI Ves 0 No Map (The governing body will be required to submit a resolution to this effect if the project is selected by the Regional Transportation Planning Agency.) 4. Is this project well.defined, well.justnied. and ready.to-go in the year proposed? Please describe any evidence supporting this statement. See attached sheet Ell Ves o No IX! Ves' o No S. Does the prOject improve air quality or does ~ have a neutral air qualily impact? Please describe any eVidence supporting this conclusion. See attached sheet 6. Is the project as proposed in compliance wilh the Americans wilh Disabilities Act? What evidence IS there to support this claim? (Please Describe) See attached sheet iii Ves o No o Not Applicable 7. For archaeology and histone preservation projects, is the proposal in compliance with the Secretary of the Interior', Standards and Guidelines for Archaeological and Histone Preservation? 0 Ves 0 No J[J Not Applicable Please describe any evidence available to suppon this claim. n - a 1/ ..,e Page 2 Include this pege Irt Hch application. Apciall'Jl'l For"" January 22,1993 March 10, 1993 File # KY-026 AS-006 TRANSPORTATION ENHANCEMENT ACTIVITIES TEA APPLICATION CHULA VISTA BICYCLE/JOGGING TRAIL SCREENING CRITERIA 1a. This project will provide a bicycle path and jogging trail for biCYClists and pedestrians along Sweetwater Road and Willow Street, through the Chula Vista Golf Course, and over the Sweetwater River. 4. Yes, the project is ready to go in FY 93-94. The purpose of the project, which is to build a bicycle path and jogging trail, is well defined and will be successful. The City of Chula Vista and the County of San Diego have agreed on the design and scope of the project. The improvement plans are complete and all necessary environmental documents and permits have been obtained. No right of way is required since the trail passes through City owned property. 5. The project will improve air quality since a non-motorized facility will be provided and more people will use the bicycle/ pedestrian path and leave their cars at home. Less congestion on the bridge will also contribute to cleaner air. 6. Yes, this facility will be accessible to all pedestrians. Currently, if a person in a wheelchair wanted to cross the river they would have to use a traffic lane and tie up traffic. 2A ~ .3 ", -/ 'I INFORMATION REQUIRED TO ADDRESS SCORING CRITERIA 1. Re(:lional and Communitv Enhaneernent (Maximum SO points) Please explain the activity's primary effects - rts intent and purpose - on the following elements: a. How does the project i~roye overall quality-of-lije. community, and'or environment? (10 points) See attached sheet b. Describe how the activity increases access to activity centers. such as businesses, schoois. recreational areas and shopping areas. Does the proposed project connect transportation modes, or does the activity have other mufti-modal aspects? Does the project reinforce or co~lementthe regional transportation system. or fill a deficiency in the system? (Maximum 8 points) See attached sheet c. Describe how activity i~lements goals in the regional transportation plan. or other adopted federal, state, or local plans. (Max. 8 points) See attached sheet c. Please explain the degree to which the project increases availability or awareness of historIC. community. visual or natural resources. ,Maximum 8 points} See attached sheet .. Please describe evidance of degree of regional or community suppon and summarlza that support below. (Maximum 8 points) See attached sheet 1. ~ the project erICompasses more than one of the activrty-specific divisions. explain. (projects can score in only one of the activity- specifIC divisions below) (Maximum 8 pOints) See attached sheet 2. eo.t E:ff@ctivene..lRelllsonable Cost (Maximum' 0 points) What IS the anticipated life of the facility or product resulting from thiS project in years? ~ years. Please indicate where you believe the project falls on the following scale: Please explain your answer. showing any calculations of benefits in Icurrentl dollar terms. See attached sheet Highly Cost-effective Reasonable Cost or Moderately Cost-effective low Cost-effectiveness Not Cost-effectivelNot Applicable a o o o What i!: the total caprtal cost of the proJect? S 318,000 . 3. Proiect Need (5 points) Are the enhancements proposed threatened. or will an opportunrty be lost ij the project is not funded? Please explain the specific threats or opportunities lost. See attached sheet m Yes o No 4. Activitv.Soeclflc Enhancement Divisions (40 points) Project cen score in only QD4 of the following activrty-specijic divisions. In whICh category should this proposal be evaluated? Select only Jmlt: lXI 1. Bicycle. Pedestrian, Abandoned Rai~ Right of Way o 2. Historic/Archaeological o o 3. Transportation Aesthetics and Scenic Values 4. Water Pollution Due to Highway Runoff. Please enswer questions for the eelected division. Only Include th81 Division page in the application. "'_IMIIDJIFotPn January 22. 1993 Page 3 Include this pege In each applic811on. ~ *..zp March 10, 1993 File # KY-026 AS-006 SCORING CRITERIA Reqional and Communitv Enhancement 1a. lb. 1c. 1d. let If. 2. 3. This project will greatly improve pedestrian safety and access to the Bonita area and provide important connections in the Chula Vista bicycle network. It will encourage more people to walk or ride a bike instead of driving. The Sweetwater River Regional Park encompasses a large portion of the valley and includes a golf course and many other recreational uses. These recreational activities as well as the businesses and shopping areas are separated by the Sweetwater River. The Willow Street bridge is the only crossing in the central portion of the valley, other crossings being at least 1-1/2 miles away. This project will greatly improve the connections between activity centers for pedestrians, bicyclists, equestrians, and disabled persons wishing to cross the river. This project will provide connections shown on the Chula vista Bicycle Facility Plan and on the Regional Bikeway Map. This project will provide its users with an enhanced scenic route and provide a much closer view of the Sweetwater River's natural resources. (wildlife, vegetation etc.) There is a high degree of public support for this facility. The Sweetwater Valley civic Association, Bonita Road Runners Club, and various other Community Groups that use this crossing all endorse this project. The project will provide environmental enhancement within the floodway and landscaping along the entire length of the project. This work is over and above what will be done for mitigation purposes and will be compatible with a scenic route. Currently, well over 1000 people cross the Willow Street bridge daily during the summer. The cost of widening the bridge to accommodate the pedestrians and bicyclists would be many times greater. Also crossing the proposed facility will be a much more enjoyable experience than crossing a bigger bridge along with the automobiles. Without this additional funding the scope of the project will have to be reduced. This may result in a negative impact on the proposed enhancements. 3A ~ 'I,l./ Division 1 1. Bicycle. Pedeatrian or Abandoned Rail Right-of-Way Propoula: a. We,' IS the need for the proposed activity? Pie e.. specity high. mea, om. or low and axplain your anawer. For example. is there a o"""oage of padestrian or bicycle facilnias availabie? 'S thare a miss,ng link in connecting the intermoda' oystem; how important IS rt? How necessary are new facilities serving the systam? (Maximum 20 points) See attached sheet. b. How well does the proposal meet or address the opportunnies andlor needs for bicycle or pedestrian facilities? (MlIlCimum 20 points) See attached sheet. -'lppkal....." Form .January 22. 1993 Page 4a Incl" ., ona diviaion paga In tha application. ~. &I"'~J,.- March 10, 1993 File # KY-026 AS-006 Activitv - Specific Enhancement Divisions DIVISION I Bicycle/Pedestrian Proposal a. There is a high need to improve the safety of pedestrians and bicyclists using the Willow Street Bridge to cross the Sweetwater River. This project will solve this safety problem and also complete a missing link in the regions bikeway system. This will be done by constructing a separate bridge for pedestrians and bicyclists over the Sweetwater River along with associated paths connecting Sweetwater Road on the north with willow Street and a pedestrian/jogging/equestrian trail on the south. The Sweetwater River Valley, also referred to as Bonita, provides for a major open space corridor in the South Bay Region. The entire valley is one big recreational area containing two golf courses, a large regional park, and several smaller parks that provide many different recreational uses. Also located within the valley are the Bonita shopping area along Bonita Road just east of willow Street, a large regional shopping center at the west end, several office buildings and a couple of elementary schools. Bonita Road runs along the south side of the valley and Sweetwater Road runs along the north side providing east/west access in the valley. Willow Street is the only river crossing in the central portion of the valley and consists of a very narrow two lane bridge with one narrow sidewalk. Other crossings are at least 1.5 miles in either direction. There are also jogging trails, equestrian trails and bikeways that connect many of the different activity centers. When pedestrians, joggers, or bicyclists want to cross the river they are forced to use this narrow bridge. Horses also use the bridge when they are unable to cross the river below. And if a disabled person in a wheelchair wanted to cross, they would need to use the traffic lane. With all of these various modes of travel using the bridge it can become a very dangerous situation. This project will provide a much more pleasant and safe connection for bicyclists and pedestrians between the activity centers on both sides of the river and eliminate many of the conflicts on the narrow willow Street bridge. 4B :f. i'" -%3 March 10, 1993 File # KY-026 AS-006 Activitv - Specific Enhancement Divisions DIVISION I BICYCLE/PEDESTRIAN PROPOSAL b. This facility will provide the needed access across the Sweetwater River for the many pedestrians and bicyclists that currently use the willow Street bridge. It will provide a safe and aesthetic crossing for its users and will encourage others to leave their cars at home and use the new bridge. A large number of pedestrians and joggers that currently use the willow Street bridge will definitely use the new crossing rather than deal with the automobiles. Most bicyclists will also want to use this path rather than the willow Street bridge. Currently there are bicycle lanes along Bonita Road. In conjunction with this project the City will be placing bicycle lanes on willow Street between Bonita Road and the proposed path. Cmji/teaapp) 4C ~ ~~~.., .c..,:... o! 81 I I I I I ....~...~ 0 01 0 0' '" I 01 0 en 0' ~I r--,! 0' I 0 ,I .; I ., , W "!"'1 "" Uj! N "', ex:> /0 ....1 ",' -<, i , ; I -< en a: NI I I '" z II~ ..., ... W I I 1 , i , ~ , , III , >< ! W , 1- ... I I ! ... (.) I I , .... , 1 W Nf- I I I I .., !~~ 0 I a: ... ... .;.,-,:.,. ! ~ I I i I ~ .- ....,'. I I I (/) t~ , , I a: <C I I :3 l- I - .-':'.':"" ..J ~ \t I 0 ..., I ... Q <C , I 1 M (.) .ij I I I I '" i I ~ , I , ! I i N ...I I i z '" ~ il.'" 0 '" )i""" ; , - <C it: I i I - I t- > I ... < ll.. .;".' I 01 I I I I I u Q i"l" 0' 0 0' I 0 ::::i w 01 0 '" 0 I 0 '::i 0, N! .-..' 0 ::> 0. .... " " , I I , < U"\' Uj' N' '" I ex:> 0. ..J .,-:}... ....: l/"'ll - I I -< <t ll.. "II> i N I I '" ,'u. ... , I Z ... en Z w ~ ~ " (/) ....'. - > < - (/) ... t- ..., U a: < :3 ':i;i"}:::: t- ..J 0 0 Z 0 II:~:::;: ~ 0 0 w 0 0 w en Q III ll. ,,; :E w ..J .,<<'_:.:.'.:... C U 0 III '"" .:<Wo,..,..,. ;;1:;;' w H en ..J J~(& w w W ... III ;':i Z < w ~ z U tR0 oe a: III w f-< W > Cl 0 .... - ., Z < mffi III Z a: QJ '" ~ Q 0. ,:~~ ~ Z Z u ? >< z <t X ..J C a: 0 w w '" w <( :z: Q. !I ::Ii :E: '" '" W (/) z w ~ ~ .... '" .... '" Z c w in 5 0 '" ~ (.) '" ..J Q """f- z ., W Q W I~ z i 5 0 w '" .. '" -. H Z <t .:.: !:2 0 W III ..... '" '" 0 '" - c '" '" '" .... a: '" 0 U Z III W (.) w :E: Xl 'tl ., ..... <( ,i w c III " '" '" ~ f-< ~ - Z < I! c z z c (.) ..... ..... 0 ... '" t- <t (.) Cl 0 0 > :E: a: '" u u '" ~ H H <t ::; ~ ~ c (.) ::l ., '" ., ~ > '" Z z ~ ~ '" ..... '" '" ii: f-< t- - Q. a: (.) (.) a: '" 0 0 <( '" a: LI.. ::l ::l ::l a: 13 '" ..... u C '"" '" Q. I w a: a: 0 ~ 0 '" ., ., (.) ~ :=> Q 0 t- < w .... .... ~ w w 0 ml ~ '" w :I: '" Z III III .... 0 ... U 0.. 0. U 0 c; :E: III III ..... .......... ~I c " z z ... (1 -- en w .... 0 0 Cl C C > ., ., .... " ~ '" z w w '" '" ..... 0 III S 0 '"" Z .., w w (.) (.) a: ... ... '" '" Xl .... ~ u <t 0 .... ::,m~" >< >< f-< U a: a: 0 II -~... .."'....."'...~ - H H t- o. Z ::;::::.,~::-::'-':' - ::: u '" :-:,--=<<' -:6 , '" - z.~ (J) w (.) i" a: c ~ a: c.:l 0 0 a: (J) Cl. III CJ :r ~ ell Z a: a: w - c S c Z ::l ..J Z C 0 w Q ~ ~ III M LL w 01 ::l I CJ 0 Z N w 01 Z a: 0 01 III ~ .... - c > I- Z < U. oct ::l ll. U Q a: Z - W c ...J I- W :z: C. ~ C. S Q. a: w < U. 0 :z: fJ) Z ~ LU Z ...J !2. - ::l ...J ~ - ell oct 2:fJ) < ~LU ell UU a: <a: S ~;:) ..J zO 0 LUfJ) Q ,..., ::=e" ..J 0-< LUZ ..J ;:a U- < H ZC > ~ <Z < ..J < :;:) Q. '" ZLL. ell <.? LU...J is Q 0-< Z:$ .:.: ~ '" OU z < HZ -Z < tIJ< ~< () 0-< 0-< <Z ::i >~ H ~- Q. <tIJ a:LL. ,...,'" Q. OQ O~ < ='" Ui>< C.U 0 ...... fJ)LU I- ...'" 0"'" Z-, w U <0 I- ><>< HU a: a: 0 0-< 0-< ~c. Z Uoo I I I 01 I ~ ! 0' 0 S51 01 0 U 0 ! N ..JW i "", ., . . c-, I ! 1:1 ....' '" ~O 0' I CO Oa: i .....1 ..... ~Cl. ... "" ... "" i i I 1 , c'" I I I ~i I , i I I I >- lilt: I ..., ... I I I i I tii ~i I I I I ".- I t: ... ... i I , I i ; I , I I , , - I , , t: i , , , i , , ...' i , , ... , , I i ! '" , , i i I , ! , I ! I i I I I I - ! , , , I t: , , I I ...' , i I I ... 1 I ' i , I , '(1; i ! 10: I 0 0: 0' 0' I I 0 i 0 ",,' N , \0: I . I I . 1 ! ";1 .... '" - , 0 CO t: co' i ..... I ..... ... "" , "" , , ... i ,) I i I I I I , a:C , I , Ow ! : I"" I ll.ffi~ ! , '" I~I I '-', -~~ ,-" - I ...., I.... l:ll l!!-~ 1 ~: I !I I I c C~O I ;; I-~c,) , 0 , U C OOZ I IU I I :J ZU::l I ~ , , , , I J E I j I I , ! .. i .. ! , 1 I l:ll I , e . . ! " , ....;..: 0 - ! A- .... II '! ; '" '-' 1 " ~ i -3 " :J . '" .... ~ I .f. I > '-' '" .... . , ~. ':!-cn .. ~ :0:: J I II '" II - .. LU cii ... .... ... 'C . .] < .-< .-< 0 A- -' W Q .. 0 .... - . U ..I ~~I <.? cil Cl . :0 a: -, 0 z 'r'-~;~ :l 61 0 .; is 0 ~ 0 ): z ..l: III WI ~IO ~ co, ~ ~ ~Q Cl Cl.1 O'~I 0 ~ 0 'z Z III I WI W W I- .'~ is -, 0.: tDj A- U" A- U ..J, I U)j Q)' III I '" III W :t z CI i ~]! :;pi - a :l a:1 a: . ::a ll. WI C .-<! w a: ..J OJ <! g U ~: ::t: A- -' Wi It-I "1""11 Ol~ , b -' a: c ~! 1Il1~1 -', I '.;:i~ c .. l- e -:-=:~ III - . ..c ::J ~.- ~ _Nr;:""'!l:,,"lD"'Cl-N ....'" III " :r,:.... ,...;"1-_ NN NN NNN"",", ...... :I ~ l w I::? ~ ; ~ 1(5' .., .. 2.' (I) a: c:r: ..J ..J 0 Q CO) en Z N en 0 en - ... ~ > <I: u.. 0 Q - ..J w e.. l- e.. :5 <I: u.. C/J Z W Z ~ ~ ~> (I) c:r: ~a: (I) 0< a: ~:E :5 ..J Z:E 0 W::) Q ,..., 55(1) ..J ..... ..J ;;i 0-, c:r: f-< > A ~< c:r: ~ ..J ::z:- CL '" Z(.) (I) " wZ is A ..... Z< ~ ~ '" QZ < f-<Z c:r: "'< ~- (J ..... ..... <l:LL >'" ::J f-< ~f- <'" CL ,...,'" a:(.) CL ~A :I:'" ~W c:r: U"- 0 -.. C/J"",) ...'" I- 0,..., ZO U W ><>< <I: a: I- f-<u ~~ 0 .......... u'" Z 0 0 0 0 ~ 0 0 0 0 " U 0 0 N co ...W . . . . <-. co co '" co ~O .... .... co N o a:: C"'I C"'I .... .... ~Q. .... .... .... .... I ~ Q' !l;; Cj.i Ill_ .... .... .... .... l;; i - ~ .... I.... .... .... I ll,: I .... ~ - ~ .... .... .... .... .... 'l' i - ',' ~ ! .... .... .... .... .. j ... 0 10 0 0 'l' 0 '0 0 0 . 0 0 N co .. 81 . . . , co co '" co - ..... .... co N ~ C"'I C"'I .... .... .... .... .... .... I $ M ~ Q) 0 c: N d- Ol ~Q) N c: E M - .- Q) .... Q)'=- l!! c: 0 C:rJ) ::i Z .- UJ- '" :::..(/)CC 12 '" .!! .rJ) M '" WZQ) CL. c: lw- rJ)WC: e 'E CL.>= .. ZX+ ~ 0 e- !." WW,.. .... Q,u CL.~M III . 1-:.~, i::)UQ) '" .E 2! . -- ..... W.E '" ....-- - - &. <l"!J:.... Q) -' I:: ~.,,> u(3'=- :::!. ')i,::"a:: Wa:rJ) ....-0> ~'.< (3CL.~ Cl < .. ... "~_:E u. II C .. :IE a:ClZ Z ~ Q," c" := CL.ZW 15 a:-=~ ~';:1Il ""i=CL. Z o .. '5 " ...I <<x ::l :r = C ~~.c ~ a: w. u. rJ)-" 'U - .... .... .... ,': z .CL. W U U U 0 < <CL.W W w C- ;:Z UO.., .., ..,.!W +~II: """"0 0 o 5 <<0: a: a: - - ,"" ~ ........CL. CL. CL. · l.:l U 00.... ,,- .W .... ....:IE'" .','. -, ~....< < < _w ':'.0 ~ ~, ~ ,'"- tt ~ ~ "... Q. IJ-i ... .. CIl li - .., .., .., ... 0 ~ 0 U co ....W . c','" co ~,O N olE .... .... .. ,-",,:, O~. !.. ~i w. lll.._ .... ~+.~.. --r;; ~I '':'--~ ;:~~ .... ~- " o'S ~.i ~:. - ..... ~ ., .... ':g 11 ~.'.~ 7 ~ .... ~-:-.... ':'1 g a.~_ s2 ex; l-:lll co 'Ii _ N ~.,~ ........ ~ " ~;.. ~ a: $ ii:",.~, W 0 ~..,_'. w VI . C ~ OJ 't' .,~ Z :: .s ~,.::;) w 5 __..-. U) - ii'-' Q It '" '::t: W 0 ~ .-~~C/JO.. ~.' C/J ~ .... .... -:;WO 00 :;)wll!% ~'iO" 58 '>:kWOO- "':a:a:ll!; ;ie"e..!zw , ,- Z a: ::l i!:: . " 0 ~-' f-'" is u.. < ~ . . Z w-' .. :;) ..J :1: ;f u.. ..J .... u. <I: .".... ..JoU;Cl: <I:"..s:g ~~....." <;::O::z: --~~ :I ~ ~ '" " t; III i ~ '" . ASSURANCES CommrtmenVPrior Commrtment: 'Has the ifr9lementlng agency or project sponsor certified that rt is willing and able to maintain and operate the project? il Ves o No Please describe the best evidence of the cert~ication available. If none is available, when can one be provided? Project sponsor possesses legal authority to nominate transportation enhancement activity and to finance, acquire, and construct the proposed project; and by formal action (e.g., a resolution) the sponsoring agency's governing body authorizes the nomination of the transportation enhancement activity, including all undenstanding and assurances contained therein, and authorizes the penson idant~ied as the official representative of the sponsor to act in connection wrth the nomination and to provide such addrtional information as may be required. Project sponsor will maintain and operate the property acquired, developed, rehabilrtated, or restored wrth the funds for the I~e of the resurtant facility(ies) or activity. Wrth the approval of the Cal~ornia Department of Transportation, the applicant or rts successors in interest in the property may transfer the responsibility to maintain and operate the property. Project sponsor will give the California Department of Transportation's representative access to and the right to examine all records, books, papers. or documents related to the transportation enhancement activrty . Project sponsor Will cause work on the prolect to be commenced wrthin a reasonable time after receipt of not~ication from the State that funds have been spproved by the Federal Highway Administration and that the project will be carried to complehon with reasonable diligence. Project sponsor will comply where applicable with provisions of the Califomia Environmental Qualrty Act, the National Environmental Policy Act. the Americans wrth Disabilrtias Act, the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation. and any other federal, state, andlor loeallaws, rules andlor regulahons. . I certify that the information contained in this transportation enhancement activity nomination. including required attachments, is accurate and that I have read and understand the ifr90rtam infomnation and agree to the assurances on this form. Signed Date (TEA Sponsor's Authorized Representative as shown In Resolution) Printed (Name and nle) Clifford L. Swanson Deputy Public Works Director/City Engineer ....oPlC8llOfIForm January 22, 1993 ~ ""-18 Pege 5 Include thia page in each application. City Of Chula Vista Engin.e~;ng Oivision Cost Estimate ALTERNATIVE COUNTY PROJECT TITLE: BICYCLE/JOGGING TRAIL NO. ITEM QUANTITY UNIT UNIT PRICE 1 Excavation and Embankment 2 Clea~ing and G~ubbing 3 60" D,a. Re'nfo~ced Cone. Pipe 4 ~~g Type Headwall SDRSD D-35 56Ft. H,gh Chain Link Fence 6 Asohalt Conc~ete Paving 7 Decomposed G~anite 8 Demountable Posts 9 R,p-Rap 10 10ft. x 8ft. Pedest~ian B~idge 11. Soi 1 Import 12 Redwood Heade~ 1~ 18" Re,nf. Cone. P'pe 14 Re,,..f. Cone. Hedwall 15 Co~struct'on SurveY1ng 14 Revegetat,on of Wetlands+Maint 15 Kequlreo m1t1gation measures 1 1 224 3 1102 85 280 6 20 1 1500 1 22 2 1 1 1 .1.,.5. L.S. L.F. Each L.F Tons Tons Each Cu. Yd Each Cu. Yd L.S L.F Each L.S L.S L.S Fil.:AS-006 Dete:9-23-92 P~.pa~.d By: Checked By: $15,000.00 $10,000.00 $190.00 $2,500.00 $15.00 $70.00 $9.50 $86.00 $100.00 $45,000.00 $30.00 $4,500.00 $60.00 $200.00 $2,000.00 $36,180.00 $18,090.00 Subtotal Engineer,ng Const~uction staff Envi,..onmental TOTAL ~ "'...2--1 A.C. S.A. AMOUNT $15,000.00 $10,000.00 $42,560.00 $7,500.00 $16,530.00 $5,950.00 $2,660.00 $516.00 $2,000.00 $45,000.00 $45,000.00 $4,500.00 $1,320.00 $400.00 $2,000.00 $36,180.00 $18,090.00 $255,206.00 $45,000.00 $12,760.30 $5,000.00 $317,966.30 .>" ., ... S'/1;-I:/' t9 <"''1'/1;- O"/D "/r~ BICYCLE ~~ J .. ... . ~ , .' '" , J \ \ 0 ) ~ z /' ~ ..-""'. -- .' A . - ~ - . - -' . ~. . , .~ '. FUTURE PROPOSED BICYCLE/JOGGING TRAIL ..,""""~ DRAWN BY: M J I PROJECT TITLE CONSTRUCTION OF BICYCLE/JOGGING TRAIL DATE: 3 / 5 / e 3 ALONG WLLOW STREET AND SWEETWATER ROAD ~ 1\1 '1-J/J g ~ ~ 6~ [.lJo ""'..: -- [.lJ": d~ ;>-< S::~ >:QGJ tiJ~ ~~ g:~ t.1.,8 0": Q:l ~tii ~~ 6'" g~ 5~ cn~ ::I:z ~~ ~ g "'" ..It..... ft~ :- ,F '. . . .. .: ~t,,--: Ii '. :.~ ,,-:~ : , It' 0- f .' .;. . , , ~ iJ .. rft . ~ t " , " .t ((hi' ,:tI. , . '~J.j;~'41 ~ ; t" ., '~r . . . "....... . :t ( 'IIJ ' . \' ~..:<;j~~ <;jg:z~5~ -'!3~oU!i2 ~~a~~~~ ...o~ ~~ ~..:<~::E"'- ~-O""'''' ~~~B:;jg o<O!i:t1l~g ~~gQ~~Eii5 8~0"': -'~ -,,,,2~o~i= ;>-~OE-' ;l9i=:G i=:-,<2 ~~~~ ;;;~~o 5t1l...:"" o<'? '" V':l8r.t.i- o=:QCI:I z SO ;;;ao...:~ 15Q:l g~!;i E-'::E ffi -'I'" 0",0t!: == z~B:...: ,~ ~~~~~!i: ~~~~~~~ '" <.....0<.... ot1l...u..z~t1l i;~~~;~ Q:l~~9~ ~ I/.,'~J The dejJV.ment has 30 days from date of .... ~iPt~a completed application in which "0 t6..aIe its recommenClations_ This time period not begin until the departmenl ,; ~ _'he a. ppropriate fee (see attached '.g.~le) T.H.P. No. Notification No, ~; ??1i> 7 ~ Received /; -,,, 'l'.. Sf ATE OF CALIFOllNIA THE RESOUllCES ACENCY DEPARTMENT. OF FlSH AND CAME NOTIFICATION OJ' REMOVAL OF MATERIALS AND/OR ALTERATION OF LAKE, RIVER, OR STREAMBED BOlTOM, OR MARGIN A. APPLICANT Pursuant to Sections 1601-1607 of the California Fish and Game Code I, l(l~'; ~(lr:S~ CITY ~~':::S~~t of 270 FO(lJ.m;J .1.Y~ VI~T.~ C~ Q]Q1C' Representing cr:1' Qr ~J' " ~~t;; 'Name act oIlndividual. ApIJC)', Campu:y, etc owDiD& prqJerty ordoina 'It'OI'l Hereby notify the California Department of Fish and Game of operations to be carried out by or for me from lh' PH1~ T\R'W(,,...r _., Name Stream. Iver:of1.:.ake J.I,~fl::,~Y 4...J.,~ll.~e of to MARCH 30, ]~o.t. County, tributary to &vEr'NATER on or affecting E!)' ~IRCC" ~''''Body Located S'T'T~ 01 gtrr;RTPJ.IT:' ll"'-!;''''+~ _.ol, _.~ .. , ~lgRTn 9r ROr'IT!. ROAP Section ;~H:; ~'-'''';'~''r~, , A'I1, Township 1 7 <':f)' IT'~1 Range 1 "'1<"'T USGS Map ,.,.-..... ',. . H' rT'T't\ rt' ""l;'r\~lPi! 7 c:. , Co. Assessor's Parcel No. "'P" 501 -")/ i\-'"I/I Property owners name and address (if different from applicant) , ,. _tj'" .~'- Name of Person to Be Contacted at Site During Operations is responsible for operations at the site. He/she can be reached at .....,. .,..,t\-'T"'-'~- ~ ,",'," ';" C'I~". ,rTC"......, r.. . r 'MailingAddres5 -. ,-_ .'":e". _ " 't."I . ~l':'/~~.J')4 B. Description of operation 1. The nature of said operations will be as follows: Check all squares which apply. o Soil. sand. gravel. and/or boulder removal or displacement o \\,'ater diversion or impoundment o Mining--<>ther than aggregate removal O.Road or bridge construction o "Levee or channel construction 2. TyPe of material removed, displaced or added ijlxSoil 0 Sand 0 Gravel 0 Boulders Volume 3. Equipment t;, k ~Sed iri'th~ described site :JT;I:::'A>:: <r-::3Tf.l!C'fI.'.'!: ~o;;n" ;E:IT 4. Use of water (i.e., domestic, irrigation, gravel, washing. etc. - N': A Quantity t .1J'ticplbe type and density of vegetation to be affected, and estimate area involved. (!.~-r~ ').r ,4:rtHrDIjA '-'vtl:u~d~ 0.05 a~r9 (If fresRvat.er BlaFe],. O.G] aere ef 6. What actions are proposed to protect fish and wildlife resources and/or mitigate for project impacts? o Timber harvesting or any related activity required for harvesting timber o Temporary, recreational or irrigation dam Cl Fill or spoil in bed, bank, or channel D Other-Describe below "/A SSl:ltkt:yfl. '...'11115... Se,ytsL Sf"f.- !"!""i'"A(i1rrl ''!''iL'''"'''' tzr~TQt:""!"IO)-' ?l."~' 7a. Does project have a local or state lead agency orrequireother permits? q Yes 0 No 7b. If 7a answer is yes. please attach or identify any available environmental document 7c. For state-designated wild and scenic rivers, a determination of the project's consistency with the California Wild and Scenic Rivers Act must be made by the Secretary for Resources. Until the Secretary determines the project is consistent with the Act, the Department cannot issue a valid agreement. A tentative agreement will be issued, conditioned upon a finding of consistency by the Resources Secretary. . 7d. THIS AGREEMENT IS NOT INTENDED AS AN APPROVAL OF A PROJECT OR OF SPECIFIC PROJECT FEATURES BY THE DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND GAME. INDEPENDENT REVIEW AND RECOMMENDATIONS WILL BE PROVIDED BY THE DEPARTMENT AS APPROPRIATE ON THOSE PROJECTS WHERE LOCAL, STATE, OR FEDERAL PERMITS OR OTHER ENVIRONMENTAL REPORTS ARE REQUIRED. 8. Briefly describe proposed construction methods. Attach diagram or sIc,etch of the location ,;,f you~,oP.!'ration to d~ly indicate t~e strea!" or other water and access and distance from named pubhc road. Indicate locked gates Wlth an X. Show existing features Wlth a sohd line ( ) and proposed features with a broken line (- - - - - - -). Show compass direction. Attach larger sCale map if necessary. ,.' ',t / ~ 'Dol. ., ""'" ..,. ,.. HO CARBON H..DED ~ (MY. 11/87) ~ I t> II ..JJ., ~el ApP;oanl C1TY Et\G!!\EER FOR JOH!: GO~S ADDENDUM TO NEGATIVE DECLARATION IS-91-39 BICYCLE/JOGGING TRAIL, CHULA VISTA GOLF COURSE PROJECT NAME: Bicycle/Jogging Trail in the Chula Vista Municipal Golf Course PROJECT LOCATION: Adjacent to Sweetwater Road and Willow Street ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 593-240-24 PROJECT APPLICANT: City of Chula Vista, Engineering Division CASE NO: 15-91-39 DATE: May 12, 1992 I. INTRODUCTION The environmental review procedures of the City of Chula Environmental Review Coordinator (ERC) to prepare an Negative Declaration or Environmental Impact Report, following conditions is present: 1. The mi nor changes in the project des ign whi ch have occurred since completion of the Final EIR or Negative Declaration have not created any new significant environmental impacts not previously addressed in the Final EIR or Negative Declaration; Vista allow the addendum to a if one of the 2. Additional or refined environmental data available since completion of the Final EIR does not indicate any new significant environmental impacts not previously addressed in the Final EIR or Negative Declaration; and 3. Additional or refined information available since completion of the Final EIR or Negative Declaration regarding the potential envi ronmenta 1 impact of the project, or regardi ng the measures or alternatives available to mitigate potential environmental effects of the project, does not show that the project wi 11 have one or more significant impacts which were not previously addressed in the Final EIR or Negative Declaration. This addendum has been prepared in order to provide additional information and analysis concerning the revised project design. As a result of this analysis, the basic conclusions of the Negative Declaration have not changed. Drainage, noise, traffic, visual impacts, and geology/soils impacts are deemed to be less than significant for the proposed project. Biology impacts are deemed significant but mitigable. Therefore, in accordance with Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, the City has prepared the following addendum to the Negative Declaration for the Bicycle/Jogging Trail (IS-91-39). ~ "'-3} -2- A. Proiect Settina The proposed project site is a 2-acre parcel within the Chula Vista Municipal Golf Course adjacent to the east side of Sweetwater Road and Willow Street. The Sweetwater River runs through the project site. A portion of the project site is in a partially natural state. Adjacent land uses include the Chula Vista Municipal Golf Course to the east, Willow Street and the Sweetwater Regional Park to the west, Sweetwater Road and single-family residences to the north, and cOlllllercial buildings to the south. B. Proiect Descriotion An Initial Study (IS-91-39) was completed and a Mitigated Negative Declaration was issued on October 23, 1991. Since that time, minor changes to the project design occurred. The proposed project des ign still i nvol ves the construction of a 14-foot wide asphalt concrete/decomposed granite jogging and bicycle trail. However, the new al ignment will have less impact to the wetlands which occur in the drainage that parallels Sweetwater Road. A six-foot high cha i n 1 ink fence to the east s ide of the trail wi 11. separate the tra i 1 from the golf course. An a-foot wide prefabricated bridge will be installed over the Sweetwater River. The bridge will be of a similar design to the existin: bridges currently located throughout the golf course. On the northeastern side of the trail, a 60-inch RCP pipe will be installed in an existing dirt channel to increase the drainage efficiency of the golf course. Approximately 1,100 cubic yards of fill will be placed in the channel. C. Identification of Environmental Effects The Chula Vista Environmental Review Coordinator determined that the proposed project redesign will not have additional significant environmental effects. Drainage, noise, traffic, visual and geology/soils impacts identified in the previous initial study are still deemed to be less than significant and will not requirn mitigation. Biological impacts are till potentially significart and ar required to be mitigated to a l! ' of less than significant. A ( :ussion of each of the potent Iy significant biological impacts T om the proposed project follows. Bioloaical Imoacts A biological assessment of botanical and zoological resources was conducted on the project site by Pacific Southwest Biological Services in July 1991. Particular attention was given to the wetland vegetation which occurs within the drainage swale illlllediately adjacent to the site along the Sweetwater River. :g " %" "f - J'" -3- The biological survey identified three vegetation types along the project site: southern willow scrub, freshwater marsh, and disturbed/golf course. No sensitive plant species were found within the study area. Although the native flora on site is diverse, much of the wetland habitat is extremely disturbed and dominated by non-native elements. Additionally, the scattered distribution of the willows and the removal and/or degradation of understory vegetation has decreased the vegetative and structo1o al diversity of the woodland. The site's wil dl He value has been degraded through 1 imited area extent, the close proximity to human activity, and invasion by non-native species. No sensitive vertebrates were detected along the proposed trail. Sensitive bird species which have been observed in the area include the Yellow-breasted Chat, the Yellow Warbler, and the Least Bell's Vireo. However, the wetlands along the proposed trail lack sufficient quality to support breeding activities of wetland species requiring high quality wetland habitat. Significant impacts to these species as a result of the proposed project are not anticipated. New Alternative AliQnment The proposed project redesign will result in the loss of approximately 0.10 acre of disturbed wetland vegetation, including several Arroyo Willows on the north side of the drainage along Sweetwater Road, as originally identified in the July 24, 1991 biological assessment. Potential impacts to the wetland habitat within the project area are not considered to be significant due to the small size and lack of biological integrity of the wetlands impacted. In addition, impacts to the wetland and the northeastern port i on of the project site wi 11 be further 1 imi ted by install ing the pre-fabricated bridge where a drainage pipe already exists. The latest alignment incorporated the recommendations of the biological study by reducing impacts by utilizing the more direct crossing of the drainage. A Streambed Alteration Agreement will be required in accordance with Section 1601 of the California Fish and Game Code. An Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 nationwide Permit will also be reqUired for impacts to the wetlands on site. D. MitiQation Necessarv to Avoid SiQnificant Effects BioloQical MitiQation 1. The City Engineering Department shall comply with all requirements of the California Fish and Game Streambed Alteration Agreement, as well as the requirements for a Mitigation Plan recollll1ended by Fish and Game for on site revegetation and planting. ~ l1 '1..35 -4- 2. The City Engineering Department shall comply with all requirements of the Army Corps of Engineers nationwide 404 Permit. 3. During construction of the trail, native wetland vegetation should not be removed or disturbed except where allowed by California Department of Fish and Game agreement. Native wetland vegetation should be allowed to recover. E. References Pacific Southwest Biological Services, "Report of a Biological Assessment of the Proposed Chula Vista Bike Trail", July 24, 1991. Pacific Southwest Biological Services, "Letter Report on the Chula Vista Bike Trail", June 12, 1991. WPC 0389p ~'ol.O 4I..J4 negative declaration AS-006 PROJECT NAME: ~icycle/Jogging Trail in the Chula Vista Municipal Golf Course PROJECT LOCATION: Adjacent to Sweetwater Road and Willow Street ASSESSOR'S PARCEL NO. 593-240-24 PROJECT APPLICANT: City of Chula Vista, Engineering Division CASE NO: IS-91-39 DATE: August"14, 1991 A. Proiect Setting The proposed prDject site is a 2-acre parcel within the Chula Vista Municipal Golf Course adjacent to the east side of Sweetwater Road and Willow Street. The Sweetwater River runs through the project site. A portion of the project site is in a partially natural state, however, the project would not remove any trees from the site. Adjacent land uses include the Chula Vista Municipal Golf Course to the east, Willow Street and the Sweetwater Regional Park to the west, Sweetwater Road and single-family residences to the north, and conmercial buildings to the south. B. Proiect Descriotion The proposed project involves the construction of a 14-foot wide asphalt concrete/decomposed granite jogging and bicycle trail. A six-foot high chain 1 ink fence to the east side of the trail will separate the trail from the golf course. At the northern end of the project site, before reaching the Sweetwater River, the trail splits, with the bicycle trail cont i nui ng to the north, and the jogging trai 1 curving off to the east along the edge of the golf cours~. \ The jogging trail will cross the river at the point where there is currently a corrugated steel drainage pipe and where an 8~foot wide prefabricated bridge will be installed. The bridge will be of a similar design to the existing bridges currently located throughout the golf course. On the northeastern side of the trail, a 60-inch RCP pipe will be installed in an existing dirt channel to increase the drainage efficiency of the golf course. C. Comoatibilitv with Zonina and Plans The proposed project is in conformance with the existing General Plan land use designation of "Parks and Recreation" and conforms with the County agricultural zoning. ~ 21 .,.-'1 city of chul. viII. pl.nnlng dep.rtment 01Y Of environment., ..vie. ..Cllon CHULA VISTA ~ {f.t.. -.- ~:::~ --- -2- D. Comoliance with the Threshold/Standards Policv 1. Fire/EMS The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that fire and lledical units must be able to respond to calls within 7 .inutes or less in 85' of the cases and within 5 minutes cr less in 75' of the cases. The City of Chul a Vista has indicated that this threshold standard wll 1 be lllet, since the nearest fire station is 1/2 .11e away and would be associated with a 3-1/2 minute response tillle. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold PoliCY. The Fire Department has indicated that it can provide an adequate level of service to the site. This area is covered by an auto-aid contract with the Bonita Fire Department. 2. Police The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that police units must respond to 84' of Priority I calls within 7 lIinutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority 1 calls of 4.5 minutes or less. Police units must respond to 62.1~ of Priority 2 calls within 7 minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority 2 calls of 7 minutes or less. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Policy. The Police Department has indicated police service will be provided to this area within the threshold standards. 3. Traffic The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that all intersections must operate at a Level of Service (LOS) "C" or better, with the exception that Level of Service (LOS) "D" may occur during the peak two hours of the day at signalized intersections. Intersections west of I-80S are not to operate at a LOS below their 1987 LOS. No intersection may reach LOS "F" during the average weekday peak hour. Intersections of arterials with freeway ramps are exempted from this policy. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Policy. The proposed bicycle/jogging trall will have .inillal traffic impacts during construction and will have no long-term traffic impacts. Thus, the project is considered to be in conformance with the Policy. 4. Parks/Recreation The Threshold/Standards Policy for Parks and Recreation is 3 acres/I,OOO population. This Threshold/Standard Policy only applies to residential projects, thus the proposed project is exempt from this standard. ~",....3g - , . -3- 5. Drainage The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that storm water flows and volumes not exceed City Engineer Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary improvements consistent with the Drainage Master Plan(s) and City Engineering Standards. The proposed project will comply .~th this Threshold Policy. The Engineering Department has determined that the existing off-site drainage facilities are adequate to serve the proposed project. The project will install improved on-site drainage facilities, thus implementing the Policy. 6. Sewer The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that sewage flows and volumes shall not exceed City Engineering Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary improvements consistent with Sewer Master Plan(s) and City Engineering Standards. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Policy. The proposed project will not generate any sewage and will not have any impacts on this Policy. 7. Water The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that adequate storage, treatment, and transmission facilities are constructed concurrently with planned growth and ,that water quality standards are not jeopardized during growth and construction. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Policy. Due to recent drought conditions, as a condition of project approval, the applicant must agree to no net increase in water consumption or participate in whatever water conservation or fee off-set program the City of Chula Vista has in effect at the time of building permit issuance. No water services are necessary for this project; therefore, there would be no increase in water demand. The proposed project is in conformance with this Threshold/Standards policy. E. Identification of Environmental Effects An initial study conducted by the City of Chula Vista determined that the proposed project could have one or IIOre significant environmental effects. Subsequent ,revisions in the project design have implemented specific mitigation lllE!asures to reduce these effects to a level of less than significant. ~ ;;3 ~ -3'1 -4- The project, as revised, now avoids or .itigates the potentially significant environmental effects previously identified, and the preparation of an Environmental Impact Report will not be required. A Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in accordance with Section 15070 of the State CEQA Guidelines. Specific .itigation ..asures have also been set forth in the Mitigation Monitoring Program which is attached as Addendum WA". . Drainage, noise, traffic, visual impacts and geology/soils impacts identified in the initial study are deemed to be less than significant and will not require mitigation. Biological illlPacts have been determined to be potentially significant and are required to be mitigated to a level of less than significant. A discussion of each of these impacts from the proposed project follows. LESS THAN SIGNIFICANT IMPACTS Drainaae The project area is within the 100-year floodplain boundary of the Sweetwater River and is subject to flooding hazards. The proposed project involves the installation of drainage improvements which may provide for more efficient drainage and alleviate potential flooding hazards. Therefore, the drainage impacts identified on the initial study have been deemed to be less than significant. ~ The proposed project would be associated with potential noise impacts during the construction phase of the project. Noise impacts would result from the use of earth moving equipment which can range up to 70 dB(A) and above for backhoes and concrete pavers. Although trail construction activities would represent a temporary significant impact on ambient noise levels, they would be short-term and temporary, would terminate upon completion of the project, and would be limited to daytime hours. Therefore, noise impacts are deemed to be less than significant. Traffic The pr~posed project would be associated with a temporary increase in construction truck traffic generated during the construction phase of the project. Traffic impacts would be short-term and temporary, however, and are deemed to be less than significant. ~ ~1!J ,/..'1" -5- Vfsua1 ImDacts The proposed project involves the construction of an asphalt concrete/ decomposed granite jogging trail and the installation of a prefabricated bridge. The trail is designed to connect with a larger network of bicycle trails proposed in the area, and the bridge is of a type and sort found throu~hout the golf course. The trail design is such that it will have a .inimal impact on the surrounding wetland vegetation and will be required to comply with Department of Fish and Game standards. No trees w111 be removed with the proposed project. With compliance to the conditions of project approval, visual quality impacts are deemed to be less than significant. Geoloav/Soils The Engineering Departme~t has indicated that potentially significant, adverse soils conditions may exist within the project area, due to the presence of alluvial soils and the potential for l1quification. Geology/Soil s impacts will be reduced by adherence to the geotechnical recommendations set forth in the geotechnical report that must be prepared as a condition of project approval. SIGNIFICANT, BUT MITIGABLE IMPACTS Bioloav A biological assessment of botanical and zoological resources .was conducted on the project site by Pacific Southwest Biological Services (July 1991). Particular attention was given to the wetland vegetation which occurs within the drainage swale illlllediately adjacent to the site along the Sweetwater River. The biological survey identified three vegetation types along the project site: southern willow scrub, freshwater marsh, and disturbed/golf course. No sensitive plant species were found within the study area. Although the native flora on site is diverse, much of the wetland habitat is extremely disturbed and dominated by non-native elements. Additionally, the scattered distribution of the willows and the removal and/or degradation of understory vegetation has decreased the vegetative and structural diversity of the woodland. . The site's wildlife value has been degraded through limited areal extent, the close proximity to human activity, and invasion by non-native species. ~o sensitive vertebrates were detected along the proposed trail. Sensitive bird species which have been observed in the area include the Yellow-breasted Chat, the Yellow Warbler, and the least Bell's Vireo. However, the .wetlands along the proposed trail lack .sufficient qual ity to support breeding activities of wetland species requiring high quality wetland habitat. Significant impacts to these species as a result of the proposed project are not anticipated. '";is -~ ~ 1/-"1/ -6- Potential illpacts to the wetland habitat within the project area are not considered to be significant due to th slla11 ize and lack of bi in it of the wetlands im act n a ition, .pac s 0 e wetland and the nor e e n por on 0 the project site will be further limited by installing the re-fabricated bridge where a drainage pipe already exists. A 5treambe Alteration Agreement will be required in accordance ection 1601 of the California Fish a~J Same Code. An Army Corps of Engineers Section 404 nationwide Permit will also be required for impacts to the wetlands on site. F. Mitiaation Necessary to Avoid Sianificant [ffects Bioloaical Mitiaation 1. The City Engineering Department shall comply with all requirements of the California Fish and Game Streambed Alteration Agreement, as well IS, any other requirements recommended by Fish and Game for on site revegetation and planting plans. 2. The City Engineering Department shall comply with all requirements of the Army Corps of Engineers nationwide 404 Permit. 3. During construction of the trail, native wetland vegetation should not be removed or disturbed except where allowed by California Department of Fish and Game agreement. Native wetland vegetation should be allowed to recover. G. Findings of Insignificant Imoact Based on the following findings, it is determined that the project described above will not have a significant environmental impact and no environmental impact report needs to be prepared. 1. The project has the potential to substantially degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eli.inate a plant or ani.al cOllllunity, i'educe the nu.ber or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or ani.al t or eli.inate 111portant eXUlples of the ~or periods of California history or prehistory. The project does not have the potential to Significantly degrade the quality of the environment or threaten a fish or wildlife population. The project will not adversely impact rare or endangered plant or animal species, IS indicated in the biological survey conducted for the project. No cultural or historical resources will be impacted by the proposed project. ~ s: ~ ~ ..~ 2. " -7- ,. 2. The project has the potenthl to achieve short-te... enviro....ntal goals to the disadvantage of long-te... envi~ntal goals. The project does not have the potential to achieve short-term environmental goals to the disadvantage of long-term environmental goals. The project is consistent with the uses of surrounding properties. Complianca with the California Fish and Game 1601 Permit and the A~ Corps of Engineers 404 Permit will ensure that long-term environmental goals are not compromised. 3. The project has possible effects .tIich are individually 11.1ted but clDUlatively considerable. As used in the subsection, .c.ulatively considerable- _ans that the incre.ental effects of an individual project are considerable .tIen viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects. The proposed bicycle/jogging trail will not result in any significant adverse environmental effects which are cumulative in nature. The project does not have the potential to induce significant growth in the community, and it falls within the limits of the General Plan. The project will also increase drainage efficiency and reduce flooding hazards. 4. The environ.ental effects of a project will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The environmental effects of the project will not cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. The potential adverse impacts from construction activity would be temporary and short-term. The project may have the beneficial effect of increasing the public safety by providing an alternative route for a jogging/bicycle trail for pedestrians. H. Consultation 1. Individuals and Oraanizations City of Chula Vista: Roger Daoust, Engineering John lippitt, Engineering Cliff Swanson, Engineering Hal Rosenberg, Engineering Bob Sennett, Planning Ken larsen, Director of Building and Housing Carol Gave, Fire Marshal. Captain Ke1th Hawkins, Police Department Shauna Stokes, Parks and Recreation Department Diana lilly, Plann1ng ~ 8> r ~ ..'1.3 1--.. - -8- Chula Vista City School District: Kate Shurson Sweetwater Union High School District: Tom Silva Applicant's Agent: City of Chula Vista Engineering Division 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 2. Documents 'Title 19, Chula Vista Municipal Code General Plan, City of Chula Vista 3. Initial Studv This environmental determination is based on the attached Initial Study as well as any comments on the Initial Study and the Mitigated Negative Declaration. Further information regarding the environmental review of the project is available from the Chula Vista Planning Department, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 92010. \ ,- '" ) /'4./\-4 ({VA ).~u.v. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW COORDINATOR EN 6 (Rev. 12/90) WPC 9371P ~ ,Qg 11-1J'I . . . ADDENDUM I A' .. Mitiaation Monitorina Proaram Bicycle/Jogging Trail Project IS-91-39 This Mitigation Monitoring Program is prepared for the Bicycle/Jogging Trail Project, in order to comply with AB 3180. This legislation requires public agencies to ensure that adequate .itigation leasures are iaplemented and monitored on mitigated negative declarations, such as IS-91-39. AS 3180 requires monitoring of potentially significant and/or significant environmental impacts. The mitigation monitoring program for the Naples Street Project ensures adequate implementation of mitigation for the following potentially significant impacts: Biology Due to the nature of the environmental issues identified, the Mitigation Compl fance Coordinator (MCt) shall be the Environmental Review Coordinator (ERC) for the City of Chula Vista. It shall be the responsibility of the City Engineering Department to ensure that the conditions of the Mitigation Monitoring Program are met to the satisfaction of the ERC. Bioloaical Mitiaation The proposed project is associated with potentially significant biology impacts on site. Mitigation of Potentially Significant Biology Impacts will be ensured through the following measures: 1. The City Engineering Department shall comply with all requirements of the California Fish and Game 1601 Streambed Alteration Agreement, as well as, any other requirements recommended by Fish and Game for on site revegetation and planting plans. 2. The City Engineering Department shall comply with all requirements of the Army Corps of Engineers nationwide 404 Permit. 3. During construction of the trail, nature wetland vegetation should not be removed or disturbed except where allowed by California Department of Fish and Game agreement. Native wetland vegetation should be allowed to recover. IiPC 9662P v ~'-d'1 I/-I/S Tl'llnsportation Enhancamant Activities (TEA) Application form GENERAL INFORMATION ':\:l:.2.L v ~ar Proposed Proposal has srtes in more than one RTPA. Proposal is entirely wrthin the RTPA. Proposal is statewide or murti-regional in acope, and has no geographic 'home'. TEA PROJECT NAME: PROJ ECT SPONSOR (Agency -- Address - ZIP Code--Phone) City of Chula Vista 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 (619) 691-5021 Insen Figures In cUlTent year dollars. TEA PORTION OF PROJECT S 152,240 NON-FEDERAL MATCH :"QURCE) S 20.760 TOTAL PROJECT COST S 173.000 o TEA is a stand-alone project. o TEA is an of alar er ro'ect. Proposed transportation enhancement activity will be scored in lllll of the following divisions. Fill out and include the page indicated: Gll ,. Bicycle, Pedestrian, Abandoned Rail Right of Way (Page 4a ) 0 3. Transportation Aesthetics and ScenIC Values (Page 40.) o 2. Historic/Archaeological (Page 4b.) 0 4. Water Pollution Due to Highway Runoff. (Page 4d.) Transponatlon Enhancement ActiVity ProJeet Representative (Name. tnle. phone) Person with day,to-day respons,b,lny for proJeet (rt different from project representatIVe) (Name. title. phone) Shale Civj (6lS Hanson Engineer 691-5114 BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF PROPOS:D TRANSPO~"'ATION ENHANCEMENT ACTIVITIES (not to exceed 60 words) The project will provide much needed sidewalk along both sides of Third Avenue between Orange Avenue "nd Main Street. This' 'dewalk, along with associated curb and gutter, will be a great enhance~. . to the neighborhood. FEDERAL ENVIRONMENTAL CLEARANCE FOR TEA PROJE. (cheek propos'. .: 'ype end status.) Type: Stalus: _N.tiv. Oed.rabOn _Categorical ExemptIOn _Complete _In Progress _Environmental Impact Statement Anticipated Completion Date _Not Started Project will be exempt. Name of Lead Agency Ci tv of Chula Vis t c. AppI~For"" January 22. 1993 yl ., -4/" Page 1 Include this page in uch applielltion. , / INFORMATION REQUIRED TO ADDRESS SCREENING CRITERIA . ff any of tne applicable scraenlng eriteria below are not met, tne proposal will not be ranlead or evaluated any furtner. A "no" answer to anv of tn. followino oUl!stion.s im~diat~lv disouRirlies 'hI! orQcosal: 1. Is tne project eligible for Transportation Ennancements funding: m Yes o No a.. RELATIONSHIP TO INTERMODAl TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM -L.Function _Proximity Impact Bnefly explain dITect relationShip to transportation system. (How does tn. proposed activity ennancellle transportation system?) The ro osed sidewalks will provide pedestrian connections within the community and im roved access to the businesses along Third Avenue. b. OVER AND ABOVE NORMAL PROJECT a Yes 0 No (If tna activity is mentioned in an enwonmantal document as a required mitigation, or it tne activity is required by permitting agencies to proceed witn anotner project, tnis actIVity is not over and above a "normal" project.) . c. WHICH CATEGORY OR CATEGORIES ENCOMPASS THE TEA? (May be more tnan one.) -X...- 1. Provision of facilities for pedestrians and bicycles. _6. Rehabilitation and operation of nistoric transportation buildings, structures or facilities (including nistoric r..iroad facilities and canals). _2. Acquisition of sceniC easements and scenic or nistoric sites. _3. Scenic or nistonc hlgnway programs. _7. Preservation of abandoned railway corridors (including tne conversion and use tnereof for pedestrian or bicycle trails). Controi and removal of outdoor advartlSing. Arcnaeological planning end researcn. Mitigation of water pOllution due to nignway runoff. _4 Landscaping and other scenoe beautillcation. _6. _9. _'0. _5. Historic preservation. 2. Is tne prOlect conSistent (or "not inconsistent") wnn federal. state, regional or local land use and regional transportation plans. goals end policies? 0 Yes 0 No Please describe the plans used in evaluating consistency: Yes, this project is consistent with all local land use and transportation plans. 3. Is tne project financially Viable? EJ Yes 0 No (Tne governing body will be reqUITed to submit a resolution to tnis effect if tne project is selected by tne Regional Transportation Planning Agency.) 4. Is tnis project well-defined. well-justilied. and ready-to-go in tne year proposed? rn Yes 0 No Piease describe any eVidence supporting tnls statement. The City is prepared to desi n and construct this ro'ect in Fiscal Year 93-94 if funding becomes available. S. Does tne prOject improve aIT quality or does it nave a neutral air quality impact? Please describe any evidence supporting this conclusion. This non-motorized facility would encourage people to walk instead of drive. Ii Yes o No 6. Is tne proJact as proposed in compll8nce witn tne Americans witn Disabilities Act? Wnat avidance is tnere to support tnis ciaim? (Please Describe) The ro'ect will com I with all ADA re uirements and be accessable to all. OJ Yes o No o Not APplicable 7_ For archaeology and nistoric preservallon projects, is tne proposal in compliance witn tne Secretary of tna Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Arcnaeological and Historic Praservation? 0 Yes 0 No [! Not APplicable Please describe any evidence evailable to support tnis ciaim. "--ICOl FOf~ January 22, 1993 c - J.. "I-tl<< Page 2 Include thia page in ..en applicanion. INFORMATION REQUIRED TO ADDRESS SCORING CRITERIA 1. R.oiona' and Communttv I;:nhane.ment (Maximum 50 points) Please explain the activity's primary eff.cts . ns int.nt and purpose. on the following .Iements: a. How do.s the proj.ct improve ov.rall quality-of.I~., community, an()'or .nvironment ? (10 points) It will replace unsightly dirt shoulders and old AC berm with new sidewalk, curb and gutter. ~. D.scrib. how the activity ;~craaSls acc.ss to activity c.nt.rs. such as busin.ss.s, schools. rec..ational ar... and shopping ar.as. Do.s the propos.d proj.ct connect transportation modes. to: does the activity have oth.r mu~i-modal aspects? DOIs the proj.ct r.inforc. or complement the r.gional transportation syst.m, or fill a defici.ncy in the syst.m? (Maximum 8 points) The sidewalk will provide improved access to the businesses and residences along Thirn Avp.nnp. ~nd prnvinp ~onnp~tiong with other sidewalks. c. D.scribe how activity impl.ments goals in the r.gional transportation plan, or other adopted f.d.ral, stat., or local plans. (Max. 8 points) This project will implement the City's goal of providing sidewalk along all public streets. c. Please explain the degree to wn.ch the project increases availability or awareness of histone. community, visual or natural resources. ,MaximumS pOints) This project will greatly improve the character of the community and provide needed access and safety for pedestrians. e. Please describe eVidence of degree of regional or community suppM and summarize that suppon below. The businesses, residents and schools in the community are very supportive sidewalk~ alon~ Third Avenue. (Maximum 8 points) of having :. H the project encompasses more than one of the activ~y-speclfic divisions. explain. (projects can score in only one of the activity. Sp.cnlC diVisions below) (Maximum 8 points) N/A 2. eo.t E:H~etivene..!Rel!lson.ble Cost (Maximum' 0 points) What IS the anticipated life of the facility or product resulting from thiS project In years? 2.L years. What IS the total cap~al cost of the prOJect? S ] 71.000 Please indicate where you believe the project falls. on the following scale: Please explain your answer. shOWing any calculations of benefits in Icurrent] dollar terms. Highly Cost-effectIVe Re.sonable Cost or Moderately Cost-effective Low Cost.effectiveness Not Cost.el1ectivelNot Applicable m o o o 3. Proiect Need (5 points) Are the enhancements proposed threatened. or will an opponun~y b. lost ~ the proj.ct is not funded? Pi.... .xplaln the specifIC threats or opponunitles lost. No enhancements will be made, if project is not funded. o Ves o No 4. Ae1ivitv.Soeclfic Enhancement Diviaiona (40 points) Proj.ct can 1C0re in only llllI of the following activ~y..peclfic divisions. In wtllch category should this proposal be evaluated? Select only llllI: Ii1l 1. Bicycle. Pedestrian, Abandoned Rail Right of Way o 2. Historic/Archaeological o o 3. Transportation A.sth.tics and Sc.nic Values 4.' Water Pollution Due to Highway Runoff. Ple..e answer questiona for the "Iected division. Only include that Diviaion palla in tha application. . .-..... January 22. 1993 .Q3 ~'4/' Page 3 Include thi. page in each application. Division 1 1. Bicycle. Pedeatrian or Abandoned Rail Right-of.Way Propoaela: eo What is the need lor the proposed activity? Please specify high. medium. or low and axplain your answar. For axa"..:>la. is thera a shortage of pedestnan or bICYCle laclln,es available? Is there a missing link in connac:ting the intermode' system; how important is rt? How necessary are new lacllltles setYIng the system? (Maximum 20 points) This part of town has a shortage of sidewalks. Third Avenue is a major street in the neighborhood and has a high need for sidewalks. The high speed and volume of the traffic makes for a very unsafe pedestrian route. The existing improvements (non-improvements) are not conducive to pedestrians, thus limiting access in the neighborhood. This project will go a long way toward providing the much needed sidewalks for this neighborhood and replace the unsightly improvements. b. How well does the proposal meet or address the opportunnies and/or needs lor bicycle or pedestrian lacilities? (Maximum 20 points) This project will construct much needed sidewalks to the community, providing access to businesses and connection to existing sidewalks on Orange Avenue and Main Street. It will also enhance the community's image. "PPkalion Form January 22. 1993 ~ 1./..4/ , Page 4a Include one division page in Iha application. ASSURANCES Comm~ment/Prior Comm~ment: Has lhe implementing agency or project sponsor certified Ihat ~ is willing and able 10 maintain and oper81e Ihe projecl? CI Ves o No Please describe the best evidence of Ihe cert~icallon available. If none is available, when can one be provided? Project sponsor possesses legal authority 10 nomin81e transport81ion enhancement activity and to finance, acquire, and construct the propesed project; and by formal action (e.g., a resolution) Ihe sponsoring agency's governing body authorizes the nomination of thetranapertation enhancement activity, including all understanding and assurances contained therein, and authorizas the parson idant~ied as tha official representative of Ihe sponsor to act in connection with Ihe nomination and 10 provide such add~ional information as may be required. Project sponsor will maintain and operate the property acquired, developed, rahabil~aled, or restorad with the funds for the IKe of tha rasu~ant facility(ies) or activity. W~h the approval of the Cal~ornia Department of Transportation, the applicant or ~s successors in Inlerest in Ihe property may transfer the responsibility to maintain and operate Ihe property. Project sponsor will give the California Department of Transportation's representative access to and the right 10 examine all records, beoks, papers, or documents related to the Iransporlation enhancement activ~y . Project sponsor will cause work on the project 10 be commenced within a reasonable time attar receipt of nolKication from the State Ihal funds have been approved by the Federal Highway Administralion and Ihat the project will be carried to complelion with reasonable diligence. Project sponsor will comply where applicable with provisions of Ihe Califomia Environmental aual~y Acl, the National Environmental Policy Acl, the Americans wrth Disabllrtles Act, the Secretary of Ihe Interior's Slandards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation, and any other federal, stale, andlor lceallaws, rules andlor regulations. I cerllly Ihalthe information conlalned in this Iransporlation enhancement aCllvity nomination, including required anachmenls, is accurale and that I have read and understand Ihe import am information and agree to the assurances on this form. Signed Dale (TEA Sponsor's Authorized Represenlative as shown In Resolution) Printed (Name and Tnla) CLIFFORD L. SWANSON, DEPUTY PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR/ CITY ENGINEER ~_iOnForm January 22, 1993 ~-J .,...S~ Page 5 Include this page In each applica1ion. CJ) w CJ) z W Q. >< W ~ " w .., 0 a: Q. (/) ..J a: <t :5 ~ - .J Q. 0 <t 0 M " C> . ..J Z N C> ..J 0 C> - - <t I- > < ~ 0 0 - W -' l- e.. < e.. .J < ~ CJ) Z W Z - ~ l- (/) - > < - (/) I- 0 a: < :5 I- .J Z g WCJ) =:W .J wCJ) .J < OZ > ZW < <e.. .J X>< Q. ZW (/) w-' Q zS ~ 00 Z -Z < 1-< (.) ~~ ::i Q. a:LL. Q. 01- < e..O 0 CJ)w I- Z-, w <0 I- a: a: 0 I-e.. Z .'.. 01 ~ j I ~t Ig.' oj I 0 j 0 .,,'''W ~ , 0 '"'2 I . 60 ~I ! I i O"l ,.... if .... , I - I tit I I I j , j i , I i '.... I ,(b I g I I I 7'" tit I I , tit .'v;'. I I , Ii I I - ;;~ tit 1 , , tit , I ! ! I .... I ii : : I I ;:,:.:1'- I i~ , tit I tit i , I , I i I j , '0> : , :;>~,..... :i~ 1 i , tit tit I I I 1 I 01 I ;ti 0 , I 1 I I 0 0 1 0 .,., .,., 0: I I I I -c ,....: -c' I I I 0 ,.. .' "' .' I , I I I . 0 , \0' .,.,, I : I I O"l ...-.;::...... - , ~: .....Ii I I I 1 I I ,.... '''.> -I j : - u. ... , , I ... .. ., :';.. .. .. :"z.:.""-' 1#1". w ~ .::~::-.' Ul I&. Ul i,f2.:- c (j W ~":.::::. W I~m w !2 w ..l A- .. a:: !i Ul w Cl 0 - A- v:'ffi Ul a:: %$ A- z Z )C @~ Q i! ~ w w w ,f# ~ i5 I- Z W CL ,::::::t.: C w 5 Co) {W~ z Ul w I~ z i 8 0 w (3 52 w Ul :' ,: Ul Co) W c a:: :1.~~~ w w c Ul ::E: A- ',"",,' Q Z Z C Co) ..l iWA- Cl 0 0 > ::E: a:: ~ ,~~ t: t: c Co) ::I c.",;.:,,:, Z ~ CL i! u Co) a:: A- t#;;... ::I ::I ::I a:: c '"';n: w 0 Co) I a:: a:: 0 A- W .... .... ~ w W ..l 11 li Ul Ul Ul Ul C Z Z ::E: i Cl c c g 0 0 i! w w w Co) Co) ..l ..l :~I;" - N r._.._~ ...-;: - ~ - ! e e. '" ~ Ii1 ~ S Q-lo 41..5/ IJ) a: < ...I ...I o Q C') en I Z ~ o ;!! ~ > < ~ o Q ~ UJ c.. ~ c.. S < ~ z ID z ~ ~ > < ~ IJ) o a: < S ~ ...I Z 0 W(I) Q :i W ...I W (I) ...I OZ < ZW > _c.. < % >< ~ ZW IJ) w..J is zS ~ Q~ < ~ < () <z ::; ~- ~ a:.. ~ o~ < c..o 0 (l)W ~ z.., UJ <0 ~ a:a: 0 ~c.. z en w en z w CL. >< W ~ o w -, o 0: CL. ~ Z - ~ <( 0: W CL. o ..J ..J <( I I I I , , I , I ~ , ! (.) I .J W I I , i c (3 I I 0 ~ I 0 a: I tit ~ A. tit' , > '"' c z ,.. 0 -I > W tit III .- tit -. I - i -t tit, tit I ~ , i I ~ , I I I 8: I I , , - t I tit tit, I I i , i I III , I t I '" I - t tit I tit ,~ 0 '" ,. '" - - I t tit tit .. ~, . .J;.VI ,It'W --VI ...._Z i"W VI -A. W J'l< VI i~ z W 7(,) A. "'w l< it'a W .. . z i ='a: '-A. 0;':' .. CI I!~~ 1= < -z a: '!; ~ ol!:lrl W 1= VI A. A. .a: <-VI 0 W a:~- .J . A. W~a: ~ 0 A. W ft .J O<~ i-. ~ 0 ~ =!t::2 = ~ ...; ~- I ~ "' " t; &! III - ~ S . g - ) I/"S2. en w 0 i" a: c :) a: " 0 0 a: en c. '" CJ :i: ~ 1Il Z a: a: w - 0 < c z -I :> -I Z 0 0 w :) ~ c '" M LL w :> a> CJ 0 , Z N w a> Z a: 0 a> '" j:: - - 0 > I- z :> <( u.. <C ... U c a: z - W c ..I W :z: Q. I- ~ Q. S tL a: w <( u.. 0 :z: Z ~ en Z -J e. W - ::l -J ~ - 1Il <C ~en < ~W 1Il UU a: <(~ S ~::I -I zO 0 Wen c :it:) -I -I Wz < U- zC > <(z < -I :::1 Q. ZLL. 1Il W..I 5 z:$ .:.: OU z -z < ~<( u ~~ ::J Q. ~LL. Q. O~ < Q.U 0 enw I- z~ W <(0 I- ~~ 0 ~Q. z ~ I 0 I 101 I I '" I 0 t.l ..... I 0 '" -'w 0 . , ..... C-' I I ' I ~o , I I~I I [ I 0 oa: I I I N ~c. ...' , ' ... I 1 i I I , ... I i 0'" I r ! I !i I I i I >- I la ..., ... . i I I I I I "I I I I I I .- I ~ ... . ... , I I I I I I I ! I I I I I , , I I 1 : s: , , ! , I , , I - , 1 ~ , : 1 ... , ... , i I , I , '" I '" i . , i I i , I r - ! , ~ ! I , : ... , ... : , , I 10/ I , CI , '0 I 1\0: 0' 0 i , II I '" 0, "r--.: I . i I ..... iai . - 0 ~ N. I i N ... ... ... I ! 1 I 1 i I a:o '"", I I ! I , , Cll i I I Ow I ....., I I ...ffi~ ....., ...... I - -I::E ~, I en W :E I c: !C 5 01 I o. I is , u' , ~:E(.) i , =1 , I I I c: ooz I => , I = z (.) :>, , i I II. , . , I I E I ! I i I , I!! , 1 en , , , 2 I ~ i I .;;.- ! A- ~: e : I 11 i I -8 = I . II. If ' . I . , ... 1 I .. ~'~u, N .. - . - -'u.l Iii 'C I ..J ~t.l W ..1 A- i - '~ ~!5 u = , Cl a: _. d .. I z 'lil i!;1 is -'. . -"".. :> ~ I I"_' ~~" 0 >: z Z ell ~I 11.1 II. II. = "::6 Cl C.I ui til ti II. .Z Z ell Wi I W: I W ~ ,'it 0 - 0.: o.r 0. u Z ..J. ell, I ell! ell W :ti < ! I~ -, - a = c: I ..J, c: ::a Il. W ! i <I W c: ..J c <I u, ! % 0. a: ..J WI II- ' 1 I 01 I b ..J ..c. < 11., ell 1 I ..J, I ~ - I- ,'c;:: -' ,-' ell e - . '.C ::; Ie "i.: -N....."'!e....."'lil-N .....'" ... --.;.~... NNNNN NNN ftP.l ...... .. ~ ~ '" u ~ I (g fI tI-51 z o ~ <( o ::; c.. c.. <( en w ~ ~> ~et 0< ~:E Z:E w:;) ~CI) O..J ~< :- zO wZ Z< OZ ~- <(LL ~I- a:O Ow 5i.., zo <(et ~c. I- u ~!.!:! 1-0 oa: I-~ t: Q zl;; ~I 1Zl_ VI a: S ..J o Q M 01 , N 01 01 .... > ~ Q W l- S ~ z Z ::l VI cr: VI a: S ..J o Q ..J ..J cr: > cr: ..J CL VI Q !i cr: (.) ::i CL CL cr: o I- W b z II> 'l' .. .lll - .. t: cr; : i - t: . !-" '1-_:.~ -"- ~):. ,,"a: ;1c :.1 1... = ~-:tI'J .,' .J ~.c ,: U Z < ;:z ..It ... I- U :.!.!:! ..; 0 .,. a: :.".. aa rd o o o . C""'lO C""'l 0 .... .... N .... .... ... ... ... ... I - t: ... If: ,;, s: - t: ... ... ... .... g :8 o 0 ..O! ~ ! .... ... S N -., ;::! .5 .,~ <:CIl e..w~ 'CIlM CIlZ., WW<: 1I)c..= ZX+ WW.... c..I-M Xu 111 ~W .E u(3~ Wc:CIl (3c..!M C:OZ c..Zw -,~c.. <eX I-c:W ii:wl- ec..U UO~ -'-'0 <<a: I-I-c.. ~~~ I- ~ ......... ... ...... o 0 o .0 o .... . ... I I... . '" .... I.... '... o ~ N N '" .... ...' ... ... ... ... ... ... ... o .0 .... o N ... o ~ N N '" .... ... ...1 0;- M ., <: d- E ll! ~ c.. ~ ., ~ tIl tIl ., -' - - '" M .. I- :5i !l .I ~ Ic- e e- ~ ~ ~ II! · .. .it :E .! =- "': l5 -' t . ~:ef u. II " I- ~... C:.c: o .ti X.z:c: II) 12 I- . U Cl W - -..!'" o lil a: 'Ii 13 c.. :;_ -,2'" e -'" ~ o Z is Z [t I- U W -. o a: c.. -' e ~ i - .. I- U ~:!.!:! I-i ... ., ....,," I:~ ti.i 1Zl._ ... ~+.:. ~:l:; ~i ':.::.... .:~t: .... ':".1 ;,.i - :; t: ... ...~ ~:.i ....... ct: lit .:t...- :-, o ~ N . ~~- :t ~i ~'-"-; ...' t: ... N '" .... :I <( a: " o a: c.. en ~ a:: w c Z ::I ~ en w ::I o w a: " Z - C z it !:: ~.. a: ";":.W ~"~.' Q .""'Z ~... ::I N .. ~ if ... " t; ~ ~ ..c 11/"5~ CITY OF CHVLA VISTA. ENGINEERING DIVISION COST ESTIMATE PROJECT TITLE: Sidewalk Safety Program - third Avenue, Between Orange Avenue and Main Street o.o.n: PREPARED BY : CH2CKED BY: 02126/92 AWS SMN NO, rrEM QUANTITY UNrr UJo,1TPR1CE AMOUNT 1 Removal of Existine- AC Sidewalk 8,400 SF $2,00 $16,800 2 Remo\'JI of Existinl! AC Curt- 2,600 LF 5.00 13,000 3 PCC Sidewalk 14,000 SF 3.00 42.000 4 PCC Curb and Gutter 3,000 LF 15.00 45,000 5 Re!,'catiCln of Street Lie-hts 8 EA 2,OXl,OO 16,000 6 Traffic ContrCl! LS LS 5,000.00 5,000 SUBTOTAL $137,&00 ICONT]~GE~C]ES (:S""r) $34,450 TOTAL $172.250 SAY $173.000 . I/--S5 c:cr ; , -...-. ---. ---. - ---.,. ..... .... --- . . . I ... ' . , ,. . ...... .,." ",',.,1'" .., .~- ....., ,.... -. J,"" , . I I I I I I --""'\~- ~ , ,. T .,,. ... _ _ .. , t I 'I, I .' ., I; , f ., . . t. , . , 1'1: ,f I .. ,... Q.I'lANG-' . . . . . . ~= >: . . . \ . \" ...... . .~ . , \..- , , , ~ ~ o::r -.::0 ~ []J1Im] ~ rnrnm ; DIJ]J]]] z rrmnTTTl ~ ~~~ c DIlIDIID ~ i ITIlJJIIJ] IlJJI] [] ITIJJII ~ ~ [[[[I 1] ITIm[[ DIIJI]]J]J []][][II [I IJIIIJI] ~ Project Location: ! ~ []]]][II]Ij] cm:J] ...................... ~ DJ]]]illJ [I[QI]JI SIDEWALK SAFbTY PROGRAM- THIRD AVENUE, BETWEEN ORANGE AVENUE AND MAIN STREET ~ " ~ 11:- ..... = ... I = = DUn at lAWS DA'1'I1 0"'../26/9: ----... . , ---..I ----- , , , ~~ j' ~:ty Of Chura V:sta Eng1neer1rg Ulvislon Co~.t Est1rr:ate A~!c~~A !V~ COUN'~-Y p~!v.j l::.- 1 ....:.. Slr~:Yl.;Lt/JUbL"- ""F:i !'kAl'L NC ZEM '" '1 ~xcavat~on ana ~m~ ~ ~~22r~ng E~d GrLbb~, ~ b" U~B. ke,~forced 4 w'" .....'9 i'y:;e reacwa -! -1 S~l" 0UAN!lTY UNlT 224 :3 o ~ ,... ':: j-.' - ~..... C;""':c'" r b t::::,':'-s"':t Co~-,c""'e"':e ""B\ring 'f Ue=8~~=?eC ~""'a~~~~ w 0E~~_""'"':e~~? Ucsts _ !-: - c'- "\' -= :: ''';:1- ,-'. ... ;-"2C'e~t""':an - c.;- ~.:: E- '-, ....:;:.- ~':: - ::. ...' - ;:"E '-.' '~' - ,.--- ~- '''',:::;:c:,.",',:.>"I- ::. '-'. . - ,..,' ,,- - - ,.....- '-- '--, - ':",-1"'" \'E; \. -, -';; c": \.Ae~ ',J. '-\ '?.' c'~ ':' ~ ,~t - c-' 'I '1::;, '-<EC..' "e':- i'" -,1,- ""\ C,::":: -, On :::iubtctal C::'C' -, ,...,""er.... 'Ie - . LC::s"': :uct -; 0'1 ::r"'v";-<O'lmer-",:c' "'iO! AL / €~ -..- , F' -lo/'AS-OU6 Da::;=; 9-23-~2 I PZ~~~:;f ~~: ;' Vi.. "'klCE I $,15,UOO.UO "'u,Quu.uu $-)90.UG $2,50U.UO $l S, us ~.l- t.ae h ~.~ $-"iu.uu $9.5(; $36_00 ~ ': U u _ U C $4S,UUU.U:': $:::":' . '-.~ ~ $4,50:': j:_: $tU.UU $2UU. UU $;! " C Q (: , C (: ::, $31;,"t:lU.UU $'18.0~(J.OU A.C. S.A. AMOON! $'~b,OO(;,OO $"O,CUO.UO $42.:;6U J(; q:'-' h:rll1 '1'1 '+ ' . ...,..., ,",' . U \.I $'lb,5::ll".UL $S,95D.OO $:!,bbU.OO $S'!b.OO $~,OOU.OO $4o,OUU.UU ~:4~" (jOr~:. U( $4,~CC_C:j $'.32:J.U~' ~~4SC.U~\ ~; -..:. , l) J L} . L':'" $3b,'il:::U.UU ~; '; t! , US U . () ( $255,206.00 $tlS.COO.OO $1 2 . 'J 6 0 _ 3 0 $S,uUC.UG $3'17,966.3U ',,- COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT SUPPLEMENTAL ItemS Meeting Date 3/30/93 ITEM TITLE: Resolution ',041 Reappropriating funds, rescinding award of contract to Nelson Roofing Inc. for "The Police Department building reroofing in the city of Chula Vista, CA" and awarding contract to the second low bidder, La Quinta Roofing, Inc. SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public work~ REVIEWED BY: City Manage~ (4/5 Vote: Yes~No___) At the March 23, 1993 city council meeting, this item was pulled from the Consent Calendar to give Council some updated information on this item. Due to the extensive agenda and late hour, this item was carried over to this meeting. The purpose of this supplemental agenda statement is to give the Council the new information that would have been given verbally on March 23. RECOMMENDATION: That the Council approve the resolution as previously presented. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: On Friday, March 19, at 9:30 a.m., subsequent to the preparation and distribution of the agenda statement for the March 23 meeting, Nelson Roofing brought in an acceptable insurance certificate. Since the award of the contract to Nelson Roofing on February 9, 1993, city staff had been attempting to work with them to obtain a liability insurance certificate acceptable under our specifications. The minimum requirement for an insurance carrier as expressed in the Regional Supplement to the Standard Specification for Public Works Construction and adopted by the city of Chula Vista, is a Best's rating of "A", class V or better and be admitted or authorized to transact business in the State of California. When Nelson Roofing submitted their original policy, it was from a "B" rated carrier and, thus not acceptable and staff so advised the contractor. After several conversations with Engineering staff and the Assistant city Attorney, in which we also advised them of carriers that have previously submitted acceptable liability insurance policies, staff was advised by Nelson Roofing's representative that the timing was not financially advantageous for Nelson Roofing to get a new carrier. Staff then sent a letter by certified mail dated February 26, 1993, that they had 48 hours in which to submit the proper insurance or proceedings would begin to rescind the ~ ~ I page 2, Item .s Meeting Date 3/30/93 award of the contract. The return receipt from the Post Office indicated that Nelson Roofing received the letter on March 1, 1993. Because we did not received the return receipt for several days, staff sent another copy to Nelson Roofing which was received on March 8. Attached is a copy of the letter sent to Nelson Roofing. Staff then contacted La Quinta Roofing and they agreed to extend their bid to May 8, 1993. As indicated in the previous agenda statement, Nelson Roofing's bid was for $24,389.00 and did not include a bid bond because it was below the $25,000 amount at which a bid bond is required. La Quinta Roofing's bid was $27,040.00, or $2, 651 above Nelson's bid. La Quinta Roofing was the low bidder on the City's Loma Verde Recreation Center reroofing contract and was awarded that contract. There are four alternatives available since Nelson has sent in an acceptable policy. The first is to accept the policy and leave the award with Nelson Roofing. The second is to rescind the award of the contract and rebid the project. The third is to award the contract to the second low bidder, La Quinta Roof ing Co. The fourth is to negotiate with La Quinta Roofing to award the bid to them if they will meet the low bidders cost, otherwise readvertise. Staff does not recommend the first alternative because of the lack of cooperation that staff received from Nelson's representatives, and the extreme lateness in receiving the certificate, well beyond the ten days given in the specifications for submitting all documents. The second alternative is also not recommended because of the delay in completing the project and cost to readvertise and go through the entire bid process a second time. Likewise, the fourth alternative is not recommended because La Quinta Roofing originally calculated their costs and put them forward in a public bid, and then extended their bid in good faith. If we then asked them to reduce their costs in order to have the project awarded to them appears to not be an act in good faith on our part and could possibly present problems with other contractors. Staff still recommends that the bid be rescinded and awarded to the second low bidder in spite of the additional contract cost. Staff believes that, while we try and work with contractors, the time to submit the insurance certificate in this instance was too far beyond the deadlines to be acceptable. The city has developed the requirements in the specifications for particular reasons and needs to enforce them to make them effective. The amount of time spent by staff to try to get compliance with the specifications in this case was extensive and costly and taking the recommended action will send a clear signal to the contracting community that they need to comply with our requirements. FISCAL IMPACT: The additional cost to the city to award the f: ~ 2... Page 3, Item S Meeting Date 3/30/93 contract to La Quinta Roofing is $2, 651. The additional cost to the project if we were to readvertise would be between $1,000 an $1,200 for notices and staff time at the full cost recovery rate. CLS:(CLS:C:NELSON.A13) 6..316-~ . ~~f? :- ..- ~ .....- ~- "'"~~~ -~~~ CllY OF CHULA VISTA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ENGINEERING DIVISION February 26, 1993 File # JR-065 PS-122 Nelson Roofing, Inc. Robert R3dfearn, President 616 W 6th Avenue Escondido CA 92025 REROOFING OF LOMA VERDE RECREATION CENTER AND THE POLICE DEPARTMENT IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CA This contract was awarded to you on December 23, 1993 by the city Council. One of the provisions of the contract was that you provide the City with your certificate of insurance for liability and worker's compensation from an "A" rated, Class V or better insurance company (In the event the carrier is domiciled outside CA, they must be a CA admitted carrier). Ronald Chambers, Nelson Roofing General Manager, was notified by the Dolly Hicks, Engineering Department, of the City of Chula Vista, when you submitted your contract on Thursday, February 18, 1993 that the insurance policy submitted did not fit this criteria. In order to execute the contract you would be required to submit a new policy on or before January 26, 1993. Subsequently, Ronald Chambers' office was contacted by phone on Tuesday, February 23, 1993. This phone call was to inquire as to your progress in meeting the City's policy requirement of an "A" rated, Class V or better insurance company, domiciled in CA or CA admitted, as outlined in the contract. Dolly was referred to your insurance broker, Richard A. Kaley Insurance. Dolly Hicks, has also been in contact with your insurance agent, Cheri, with Richard A. Kaley Insurance. Cheri has been ih contact with our city Attorney, Rich Rudolph, in hopes that she might persuade a different outcome on the acceptance of Golden Eagle, (a "B" rated carrier) as an acceptable carrier for this contract. On Thursday, February 25. 1993, Dolly reiterated our position on the insurance requirements for this contract to Cheri. Dolly again shared the name of Reliable Insurance and Zurich Insurance as acceptable carriers that we have recently received other contracts insured by. Cheri indicated she had shared this information with Nelson Roofing, Inc. but that the timing was not financially advantages for Nelson Roofing. Cheri was to contact Dolly with a FAXed copy of an Insurance binder by Friday, February 26, 1993. As of Friday, February 26, 1993 we have not received your acceDtable insurance policy, or a FAX copy, pending receipt of your pOlicy, covering liability for the Reroofing of the Police Department in the City of Chu1a vista as outlined in the contract requirements. E-S 276 FOURTH AVE CHULA VISTA. CALIFORNIA 9191016191691-5021 , Since we have not received the necessary insurance policy to proceed with processing the contract award due today, Friday, February 26, 1993. We therefore notify you that we will recommend to council that the award of the contract to you be rescinded and that we be directed by council to re-advertise the project. Upon council's approval of our recommendation we will proceed with the new award process. Proceedings will begin forty-eight hours (48) after your receipt of this letter. If you have any questions, please contact Alex Al-Agha at (619) 691-5179. UJ-I I 4. __~~ -- ~f----1o/ - Roberto Saucedo Senior civil Engineer {dh cc: Ronald Chambers, Nelson Roofing, General Manager Richard A. Kaley Insurance Services, Inc. Attn: Cheri 400 N. Tustin Avenue, Suite #100 Santa Ana, CA 92705 Rich Rudolph, Asst. City Attorney Diana Levin, Rick Manager (C \LETI'E.RS\1'o"E.LSONBD. INS) 5'..(p f', ". . . ~ UJif{ , COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item Meeting Date 2/9/93 ITEM TITLE: Resolution Transferring funds, accepting bids and awarding contracts for the reroofing of Loma Verde Recreation Center (Phases I and II) and the Police Depart"ent building in the City of Chula Vista, califOrnij Director of Public Works t( SUBMITTED BY: REVIEWED BY: City Manager (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No..!,j At 2:00 p.m. on December 23,1992, in the Public Services Building, the Director of Public Works received sealed bids for the reroofing of Loma Verde Recreation Center (Phases. I and II) and the Police Department building in the City of Chula Vista, California. RECOMMENDATION: That Council: 1. Transfer $43,550 from CIP Project GG-102 . Remodeling Public Services Building and appropriate to CIP Program GG-122 - Roof repairs Loma Verde Recreation Center. 2. Transfer $26,830 from CIP Project GG-102 - Remodeling - Public Service Building and appropriate to CIP Project PS-122 . Reroofing flat areas - Police Department Account. 3. Accept bids and award contract to La Quinta Roofing Inc., San Diego in the amount of $54,542 for the roof repairs Loma Verde Recreation Center (CIP GG-122).. 4. Accept bids and award contract to Nelson Roof Inc., Escondido In the amount of $24,389 for the reroofing of the Police Department building (CIP PS-122). BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: .Loma Verde Recreation Center The reroofing of the Loma Verde Recreation Center was budgeted as a two phase project In the FY 1989-90 CIP. The first phase, which involves the reroofing of the east portion of the building was funded in the FY 1989-90 budget. The second phase, which Involves the reroofing of the west portion of the building was proposed for funding In FY 1993-94. I';. 7- S- - 1..,3 Page 2, Item Meeting Date 219/93 ,""", During the preparation of the Phase I contract specifications, staff decided to combine both phases and bid them concurrently to: 1. Eliminate responsibility problems usually arising from Uability for correcting leakages at the joint of two different roofs. 2. Enable one contractor to take full responsibility for quality of work. 3. Take advantage of cost savings associated with duplication of administrative costs, and 4. Take advantage of current market conditions. The bids received for Loma Verde Recreation Center reroofing were excellent. It is, . therefore, recommended that both phases be awarded at this time, since this would result in estimated savings of about $24,660 for this portion. Police Deoartment Buildina The project involves the reroofing of the leaking sections of the built-up roof and gravel areas of the Police Department building. '""" The reroofing of the Police Department was approved in the 1991-92 CIP and was funded to utilize Development Impact Fee (DIF) funds. Further evaluation, however, has determined that the project is classified as a maintenance item and does not qualify for the DIF funding. Therefore, funds must be appropriated from another source. The recommended source of funds for this project are funds originally appropriated for the remodeling of the Public Services Building in FY 1984-85 and FY 1987-88. The need to immediately remodel the Public Services Building was mitigated by the relocation of the Community Development a few years ago. It is, therefore, recommended that these funds be used for the reroofing project. Bid Results Both projects were advertised for a period of four weeks beginning November 21, 1992. During this period plans were purchased by 15 contractors and on the bid opening date, bids were submitted by 6 contractors (Loma Verde Recreation Center) and 7 contractors (Police Department Building). The bids received are as follows: -., ~ !>A1: . e e COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item /;t.. Meeting Date 3/23/93 ITEM TITLE: Resolution / 7 () 'IZ Reappropriating funds, rescinding award of contract to Nelson Roo mg Inc. for "The Police Department building reroofmg in the City of Chula Vista, CA" and awarding contract to the second low bidder, La Quinta Roofmg Inc. Director of Public worksH City Manager --iC:t ~ vSl (4/Sths Vote: Yes...LNo~ SUBMITTED BY: REVIEWED BY: On February 9, 1993, the City Council by Resolution No. 16988 accepted bids and awarded a contract for "The Police Department building reroofing in the City of Chula Vista, CA" to Nelson Roofing Inc. The contractor, however, was unable to provide the required liability insurance making it impossible for a contract to be executed. Nelson Reroofing Inc. was aware of our liability insurance requirements from the beginning of the bid process. Staff has tried to work with the contractor to resolve this problem but they have been unresponsive. The contractor was notified of our recommendation to rescind the award of contract. RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the attached resolution which: 1. Rescinds award of contract to Nelson Roofing Inc. 2. Award contract to the second low bidder, La Quinta Roofing, in the amount of $27,040.00. 3. Reappropriates $2,914.00 from CIP Project 00-102 Remodeling Public Service Building and appropriate to CIP Project PS-122-Reroofmg flat areas-Police Department Account. BOARDS/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: On February 9, 1993, the City Council awarded a contract in the amount of $24,389 for the reroofing of the Police Department building to Nelson Roofing, Inc. Nelson Roofing was the lowest bidder out of the seven bids we received for the contract. Bids ranged frqm $24,389.00 to $43,710.00 (see attached A-113 for 2-9-93 Council meeting). Since the award of the contract, Nelson Roofing attempted in good faith to obtain the required liability insurance. They failed to obtain the minimum required insurance by the contract dOCuments. The minimum requirement for an insurance carrier as expressed in the Regional Supplement to the standard specification for Public Works construction and adopted by the City of Chula Vista, is a Best's rating of "A", class V or better and be admitted or authorized to transact business in the State of California. A.M. Best Company is a private publishing company that analyzes and rates ~'/~ \;-) Page 2, Item I J- Meeting Date 3/~3/93 ......... their insurance problem. Unfortunately, they were unable to obtain an acceptable insurance certificate and we must annul the award contract and declare Nelson Roofing in default. No bid bond was required or provided with the bid, since the bid was less than $25,000. La Quinta Roofmg bid for $27,000.00 is below the staffs estimate of 30,000 by $2,960 or by 9.9% and is $2,651 above the Nelson Roofmg, Inc. low bid.. La Quinta Roofing was also the low bidder for the recently awarded Lorna Verde Recreation Center reroofmg contract. They did provide an acceptable insurance certificate for the Lorna Verde Recreation Center reroofing project. We contacted the contractor to ascertain their willingness to honor their bid for the Police Department building reroofmg project and received a positive response. Staff, therefore, recommends awarding the contract for the reroofing of the Police Department building to La Quinta Roofing Co. La Quinta Roofmg disclosure statement is attached herewith. FINANCIAL STATEMENT: FUNDS REOUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION I. Contract amount $27,040.00 2. Contingencies (10%) 2.704.00 TOTAL FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION $29,744.00 FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION I. Account 6OO-6OO1-PS-122 $26,830.00 2. Reappropriate funds from 600-6OOI-OG-I02 to account 6OO-6OO1-PS-I22 2.914.00 TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR CONSTRUcnON $29,744.00 .-.., FISCAL IMPACT: If the resolution is adopted, this new project would reduce the cost of maintenance since the new roof will be completed. WPC F:\bome'cogiD....Smda\683.93 SMile: PS-122 .....,. ~ s;.fI . . . MEMORANDUM March 10, 1993 File: PS-122 TO: John Goss, City Manager Bruce Boogaard, City Attorney Lyman Christopher, Director of Finance Beverly Authelet, City Oerk Greg Hanson, Building Services Superintendrt John Lippitt, Director of Public Works rpv FROM: SUBJECT: Resolution - Reappropriating funds, rescinding award of contract to Nelson Roofing Inc. for "The Police Department building reroofing in the City of Chula Vista, CA" and awarding contract to the second low bidder, La Qunita Roofing Inc. REROOF FLAT AREAS - POllCE DEPARTMENT (803-/103O-PS-U2) FUNDS REOUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION A. Contract Amount $27,040.00 B. Contingencies (approximately 10%) 2.704.00 Total Funds Required for Construction $29,744.00 FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION A. Account 6OO-6OO1-PS-122 $26,830.00 B. Transfer of funds from 600-6001-GG-I02 - Remodeling Pubhc Services Building Account to 600-6001-PSl22 - Reroofing of Flat Areas - Police Department Account 2.914.00 Total Funds Available for Construction $29,744.00 WPC f:\home\engineer\SOO.93 /dl ) S - 'f 1~--1rJ TInS PAGE BlANK ~,v- ~l .-. ~ . . . RESOLUTION NO. J ?/J'I? RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA REAPPROPRIATING FUNDS, RESCINDING AWARD OF CONTRACT TO NELSON ROOFING INC. FOR liTHE POLICE DEPARTMENT BUILDING REROOFING IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CAli AND AWARDING CONTRACT TO THE SECOND LOW BIDDER, LA QUINTA ROOFING INC. WHEREAS, on February 9, 1993, the City Council by Resolution No. 16988 accepted bids and awarded a contract for liThe Police Department building reroofing in the City of Chula Vista, CAli to Nelson Roofing Inc.; and WHEREAS, the contractor, however, the required liability insurance making contract to be executed; and was unable to provide it impossible for a WHEREAS, Nelson Reroofing Inc. was aware of our liability insurance requirements from the beginning of the bid process and staff has tried to work with the contractor to resolve this problem but they have been unresponsive; and WHEREAS, the contractor was notified recommendation to rescind the award of contract. of our NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby rescind the award of contract to Nelson Roofing Inc. and repeal Resolution No. 16988. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby award contract to the second low bidder, La Quinta Roofing, in the Amount of $27,040.00. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby reappropriate $2,914.00 from CIP Project GG-102 Remodeling Public Service Building and appropriate to CIP Project PS-122-Reroofing flat areas-Police Department Account. Presented by John P. Lippitt, Director of Public Works F: \boIDe\aa.omey\683 .93 I~ - Y-. $'-1/ I ......., TInS PAGE BlANK ~ ......., ~ 5".,1'" . Page 3, Item Meeting Date 2/9/93 LOMA VERDE RECREATION CENTER (GG-122) CONTRACTOR Bid Amount Total Bid 1. La Quinta Roofing Inc., San Diego $54,542.00 2. J.P. Witherow Roofing Co.; San Diego $56,600.00 3. Stricker Roofing Inc., Escondido $58,251.00 4. Adams Builders Inc., Chula Vista $63,870.00 5. Roejack Roofing Inc., San Diego $75,770.00 6. Commercial and Industrial Roofing Inc., Escondido $76,894.00 . POLICE DEPARTMENT BUILDING (P6-122) CONTRACTOR BID AMOUNT 1. Nelson Roof Inc., San Diego $24,389.00 2. La Ouinta Roofing Co., San Diego $27,040.00 3. J. P. Witherow Roofing Co., San Diego $31,630.00 4. Stricker Roofing Inc., Escondido $33,947.00 5. Roejack Roofing Inc., San Diego $37,193.00 6. Adams Builders Inc., Chula Vista $42,890.00 7. Commercial and Industrial Roofing Inc., $43,710.00 Escondido The low bid by La Quinta Roofing Co. for the Loma Verde Recreation Center is below the staff's estimate of $55,000 by $458.00 or by 0.8%. Staff has reviewed the bid and conducted a past performance evaluation and determined that the contractor has done similar projects and has the resources to complete the job. Staff recommends awarding the contract for the reroofing of Loma Verde Recreation Center to La Quinta Roofing Co. The low bid by Nelson Roof Inc. for the Police Department building is below the staff's estimate of $30,000 by $5,611 or by 18.7%. Sta~. has reviewed this low bid and conducted a past performance evaluation and determined that Nelson Roof Inc. has available resources to complete the job and that the Company is in good standing. Staff recommends awarding the contract for the reroofing of the Police Department building to Nelson Roof Inc. . 1:1- 2- ~ -IS- Page 4, Item .Meeting Date 219/93 -... Disclosure Statement The disclosure statements of both contractors are attached herewith. .Environmental Status The City's Environmental Review Coordinator has reviewed the work Involved in the reroofing of the Loma Verde Recreation Center and the Police Department Building and determined that the projects are exempt under Section 15301, class 1 of the California Environmental Quality Act (repair or maintenance of existing public structures). FISCAL IMPACT: If the resolution is adopted, the following table represents the funding status of the projects. ROOF REPAIRS LOMA VERDE RECREATION CENTER (GG-122) FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION A. Contract Amount $54,542.00 B. Contingencies (approximately 10%) 5,454.00 C. Staff Cost (approximately 10%) 5.454.00 Total Funds Required for Construction $65,450.00 FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION A. GG-122 - Roof Repairs Loma Verde Center Account 21,900.00 B. Appropriation from GG-102 43.550.00 Total Funds Available for Construction $65,450.00 , ....... REROOF FLAT AREAS. POLICE DEPARTMENT (PS.122) FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION A. B. Contract Amount Contingencies (approximately 10%) Total Funds Required for Construction FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION $24,389.00 , 2.441.00 $26,830.00 A. 126.830.00 $26,830.00 bOO -6Dol-PS-/ZZ- ....... This project would reduce the cost of maintenance since the new roof will be completed. WPC F:\HOMElENGINEERlAGENDAIREROOF 0127113 I!J"",~ - - s-';l 10 '. THE ern' CJF CHUU. J.7STA PAR7l' DISCLOSf)~ SliC7'EMENT . ::llement of disclosure of certain ownership interests, paY'menu, or campaign contn"butions, on al] mlltters h:clill require dimetionaT)' action on the part of the aty Council, PJanning Commission, and all other "'j odies. The follov.inS information mwt be disclosed: List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the contract, i.c.. contractor, lubcontrltlor, material supplier. LA QUINTA ROOFING, INC. If any person identified pursuant to (1 j above is a corporation or pannership, list the names of all indh'iduals owning more th:1n 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any pannership interest in the partnership. MAnILYN'JOSEPHSON 51' MAXV~N ~U~~~h~UN ~~ ~ If any person identified pursuant to (]) above is non.profit orianization or a trust, Jist the names of any person serving as dire ctor of the non.profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the trust. NONE Ave )'ou hOld more thOln S25D worth of business transacted with any me~ber of the City, stOln, -,roards, Commissions. Commillees and Council within the past twelve months? Yes _ ' No ~x If yes, pJeOlse indicate person(s): Ple<lse identify each and e\'er)' person, includins any agents, employees, consultants or independent COnlr:lctors who )'ou ha\'e assisned to represent )'OU before the ClI)' in this matter. LA QUINTA ROOFING, INC. MICHAEL M. JO~~~H~UN Have you andlor your oWcers or IlgenlS, in the a~sreBale, contributed more than 5J.000 to n Councilmember in the currenl or preceding election period? Ycs_ NdCXX If yes, stllh~ \\'hkh Councilmember(s): '.,," is defincd IS: 'AII,I' illdll'idunl,firm. co'pnrrlln'sllip,joinr '~IIIl/It. anMntiD1l, I<<illl duh,frll'rmllll1flll"izll'iD1l, torpt>rn,iOIl, 1/,', trim, rtCt",", 1)'lIdi,nrc, ,his lInd tin)' o,htr CCIlI1lI). CII)' t/lld COUll"). dl). "wllicipnlil). tllllriet. <<An poIitiClIlsuhdll'ISitlll, "'.1' o,r.rr r'oup or tOlllbinntion t"'il'; liS "llIli,.. 'TE: AlI~rh Iddilion~l l''';C\ ~. n~rcu~I)') IIC: 12/23/92 . LA QUINTA ROOFING, Si;nllture INC. plicllnt MICHAEL M. JOSEPHSON ~-n Print or t)'PC n:lm J,t.- ~J , , nlf:lClClr/llppJicanl Ilh~l'n' II lo'..IJ ".\DJIC'LOSt'l"\T) ---- La Quinta Construction, Inc. UCENSE NO. 423212 6176 FEDERAL BLVD. SAN DIEGO, CA 92114 (619) 264-5777. FAX (619) 262-3604 """'\ HARCH 3, 1993 CITY OF CHULA VISTA ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 707 "F" STREET CHULA VISTA, CA 91910 ATTENTION. DICK THOMPSON FAX 619-691-7986 PROJECT, POLICE DEPARTMENT CHULA VISTA, CA SUBJECT, BID EXTENSION GENTLEMEN, -.. OUR FIRM WILL EXTEND ITS BID OFFER ON THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT UNTIL MAY 3, 1993 (MONDAY) 60 DAYS. SINCERELY, L~~UINTA CON~. UCTIO, INC. /;/t , ~ MAR~P 0 SECRETARY ........ ~ ~tf ---- La Quinta Construction, Inc. UCENSE NO. 423212 6176 FEDERAL BLVD. SAN DIEGO, CA 92114 (619) 264.5777. FAX (619) 262.3604 e MARCH 3, 1993 CITY OF CHULA VISTA , ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT 707 "F" STREET CHULA VISTA, CA 91910 ATTENTION, DICK THOMPSON FAX 619-691-7986 PROJECT, POLICE DEPARTMENT CHULA VISTA, CA SUBJECT, BID EXTENSION ~ GENTLEMEN, OUR FIRM WILL EXTEND ITS BID OFFER ON THE ABOVE REFERENCED PROJECT UNTIL MAY 3, 1993 (MONDAY) 60 DAYS. SINCERELY, /J1UINTA CON:~~T:' ~ MAil~P~ -:: SECRETARY e ;,)-/3-. S-I I ., . TInS PAGE BLANK . . ~ ~J~~ RECEIVED '93 /tAR 30 P5:47 457 Delaware Street Imperial Beach, MWGmJLA VIST A March 29, 1993 city CLERK'S OFFICE Hon. Tim Nader and City Council Members Chula Vista, CA 91910 Dear Mayor Nader and City Council Members: Attached to this leoter are copies of four letters concerning lands at the south end of San Diego Bay. The issues raised in ohem mayor may not bear on one proposal 00 be discussed in Action Item #8. of the Agenda for the Special Worksession/ Meeting of the City of Chula Vista City Council on Tuesday, March 30, 1993. I will read the second paragraph of ohe letter aaoed August 3, 1992, into the record during the Oral Communicaoions period of your March 30, 1993, City Council Meeting. Sing,erely, fI~y om Save Our Bay, Inc.( Aotach: Leoter datea March 16, 1993, to The Western Group, POBox 15~4, Ogden Utah 84402 from William E. Claycomb with three attachments. I \ "- ~ ',~ ~._. --,- 457 Uelaware Street Imperial Beach, CA 91932 March 16, 1993 Certified Mail #P294213379 Return Receipt Requested Mr. Phil Scott, Chief Operating Officer The Western Group POBox 1544 Ogden, Utah 84402 Uear Mr. SCO"ttl I read in the March 12, 1993, The San Diego Union-Tribune, 'page B-1, about the possibility of a touris"t railroad a - round the sou"th end af the San uiega Bay sal"t panas. So tha"t you migh"t be"tter understand the very important environ- mental values you woula be dealing with, you should secure from "the San uiego Unified Port uistric"t (SUUPu), pages 12-20, 21, 22 of Volume Three of the South San Diego Bay ~ancement Plan, SUUPU ana California State Coastal Conservancy, March 1990. The railroaa migh"t be a good idea for bringing tourist aollars to Imperial Beach, but I can safely predict that an old steam engine, chuffing and puffing coal smoke ana ash would have un- acceptable adverse environmental impacts. Such an engine elect- rified to run quietly carrying coaches at 5 mph might well be acceptable. Finally, upfront, it might be helpful for you to understand tha"t there is a bounaary problem between the (California)State Lands Commission (SLC) lanas and landS possibly owned by West- ern Salt Company in the salt pond area. It is suggested in the attached Aug. J, 1992, SLC letter to the Sierra Club Chair that SLC might be able to resolve title issues if they could be re- imbursed for staff costs and have their priorities appropriately set (last two sentences of second paragraph). lf you could raise the funds for SLC staff reimbursement, the set~ling of the boundary problem might be expedited. I would be happy to further discuss feel it would be helpful. "this ma"t"ter with you if you 7)(ic , William t< ayco b Socio-ecologist Save Our Bay, Inc.(forming) Attachments I See Page 2 ~ f. i/ .~ "'-' Page 2 i A.tachmentsl SLC Aug. 3. 1992. letter to Chair. Sierra Club (File Ref. PHC 175) wi.h SLC Gc.. 23. 1990. letter to Ms Cathy Osugi ana SLC Apr. 24. 1992 SLC letter to WiYliam E. Claycomb (file Ref.1 PHC 175) " , STATE OF CALIFORNIA STATE LANDS COMMISSION 1807 13TH STREET SACRAMENTO, CALIFORNIA 95814 ~16-445-7738 , PETE WILSON. Governor August 3, 1992 File Ref.: PRC 175 Ms. Julie Hocking Chair, Sierra Club San Diego Chapter 3820 Ray Street San Diego, CA 92104 Dear Ms. Hocking: Subject: South San Diego Bay Mr. Warren has asked that I respond to your letter regarding boundaries and developments in South San Diego Bay. Your letter attached prior correspondence from this office dated February 14, 1989; August 15, 1989; October 19, 1989; October 27, 1989; February 1, 1990; and January 29, 1991. As indicated by these letters, this office recognizes the habitat values of South San Diego Bay and will object to any developments which will adversely affect such values on lands subject to any State public trust ownership interest. The precise nature, extent and location of the State's public trust interests in many portions of South San Diego Bay are undefined by court judgment or settlement agreement. Generally, the boundaries of the state's interests must be resolved before development can proceed. Unfortunately, given the limited staffing and budgetary resources of this agency, we are unable to initiate studies necessary to resolve these title issues without reimbursement of staff costs. Even with such reimbursement, other priorities may defer work on San Diego Bay cases for some time. I have enclosed letters of October 23, 1990, and April 24, 1992, which further explain the position of this office on the subject area. If you have any further questions please do not hesitate to contact me by phone or in writing at the above listed phone number or address. Thank you for your interest in protecting this resource. " Sincerely, ~. FOSS Senior Staff Counse Southern California Region '..' . . cc: Charles Warren 3 ~ . . " ( ( . - - S':"ATE OF CAUFORNIA ? GEORGE DEUKME.JIAN. G......., STATE LANDS COMMISSION EXECUTIVE OFFICE 1807. 13th Street Sacnomanto. CA 98814 CHARLES WARREN Exacu1lva Officer EO T. McCARTHY. UautenentGovemor URAY DAVIS. Controllar JESSE R. HUFF. Director of Flnence October 23, 1990 Ms. Cathy Osugi , U. S. Department of Interior Fish and Wildlife Service 911 N.E. 11th Avenue Iortland, OR 97232-4181 Dear Ms. Osugi: Staff of the State' Lands Comm;~sion (SLC) has reviewed the Notice of Intent (NO!) by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service to prepare an Environmental Assessment (EA) for the establishment of the San Diego Bay National Wildlife Refuge. '-- As indicated in your notice, the 2500 acre area includes lands within five cities located in South San Diego Bay. The majority of the land involved in the proposal is sovereign Public Trust land, title to which passed to the State of California as an incident of its admission to the Union on September 9, 1850. Some lands on the periphery of the proposed project are privately owned lands which had been conveyed to California on September 28, 1850 as swamp and overflowed lands and subsequently were sold by the State to private parties. Other lands, granted by the Mexican government to private parties prior to 1846, are also involved. Of the Public Trust lands involved, portions have been granted in trust by the California Legislature to the San Diego Unified Port District pursuant to Chapter 67, Statutes of 1962 and Chapter 1744, Statutes of 1965. Certain lands within the 1962 grant were subsequently revested in the State effective January 31,1984 pursuant to Chapter 1114, Statutes of 1973 and leased by the State Lands Comm;~~ion (pRC 175) to Western Salt Company for a period of 25 years effective February 1, 1984 (January 31, 2009). As you may be aware, in January 1990, following the suggestion of Mr. Don Weathers, Acting Regional Director of the USFWS in Portland, I have been in periodic contact with Mr. Marc Weitzel, the Service's field contact at the TIjuana Slough National Wildlife Refuge. It is my understanding from my conversation with you that representatives from your office intend to meet with us and other appropriate agencies in Sacramento. It may be helpful if such a meeting occurs fairly early in the Service's process of preparation of its Environmental Assessment to determine the specifics of the San Diego Bay National Wildlife Refuge proposal. ""-- 1 (~. ( Staff is intrigued by, and supports, the efforts of the Service to protect the sensitive estuarine wetland and submerged habitats in the San Diego Bay area. I look forward t() hearing from you. Sincerely, ~tR:f:f DivisIon of Research and Planning cc: Charles Warren Executive Officer \ \ , " '~., " " - ~' \c::...- . . . / l...-- .~. STATE OP CALIPORNIA ~ STATB LANDS COKKZSSZOH 1807 13TH STREET SACRAHBNTO, CALIPORNIA 95814 (916) 445-7738 . PETE WILSON. Governor April 24, 1992 Ref'/pR~ 175 - File william E. Claycomb socio-ecologist Save Our Bay, Inc. (forming) 457 Delaware Street Imperial Beach, CA 91932 Dear Mr. claycom~, Staff of the State Lands Commission has been requested by Commissioner McCarthy to respond to your most recent expression of concerns regarding South San Diego Bay. The boundary issues in South San Diego Bay are as important as any in the state. The Commission will resolve their location prior to any development .hich could threaten public trust lands. T~e passage of 140+ years since statehood does little to simplify the task, Literally scores of pieces of evidence (including maps, surveys, photographs, etc.) come into play in seeking the best evidence of the last natural location of the ordinary ~igh water mark of the area. The ability to take on such a task is one which the LegiSlature has not seen fit to support in the Commission's budget, which has been severely ~ut in the last two yea~s. While a pOr'::ion of the adjudicated in San Diego Bay, only a small percentage 0f established boundary locati~n. boundar ies have been agreed to ::or like ~ost ~aterbodies in CaliF-ornid, the tota L 3.rea has ;1. Ei:,o:d a:-1d We woued like to assure you ,please 5ee attached lett"r:>f October 23, 1990) that 'ole are monito::-Llg,ctlJ.vities in the '.Ired a.-,d have met with and are assisting the efforts of the U.S. fish and wildlife service ~n 9rotecting eCJlogi;al values in South Sdn )ie.'1o Bay. sic>cere '.y. " .. /.//-? / .? ,~-/- ?:. -',- - -- CU~T;'S" ?OSSL"H' Senior ]t~Ef Counsel SO'lther."1 c~l cforn ca Req ion A-:t"chmen:: c" Hc,nocaDle L-e') .'icCar-:h" L~eucenan~ l~ov~r~or Ct~ar Les .,... lrr:-~r. '--' Exec'ltc'/e O:Ei;er ~ COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item Meeting Date ~ 3/30/93 SUBMITTED BY: REPORT on Regional Solid Waste Issues and the Proposed Participation Agreement ~ ~ Principal Management Assistant Snyder~tr City Managert! (4/Sths Vote: Yes_ No..]Ll TITLE: REVIEWED BY: Since 1989, the City has been in informal discussions with the County of San Diego regarding the County's need for a waste stream ("flow" l control agreement in order to plan for and finance regional solid waste facilities such as landfills, transfer stations and material recovery facilities (MRFs). At the 4/2/91 meeting, Council agreed with the need for such an agreement in concept and directed staff to begin negotiations with the County on an agreement which would address the County's needs but provide a great deal of flexibility for the City. City staff work on this project was eventually "overtaken" by the crisis events of the San Marcos landfill. In May 1992, the County Board of Supervisors held a Solid Waste Summit with participation from all cities in the County. The Summit focused on three major issues: 1) Institutional relationships-- What structure should be used to operate the region's solid waste system in the future? 2) Participation Agreements-- Formerly known as flow control agreements, renamed to clarify that a signatory city would need and desire to become a partner in the County's system, and 3) Host fees. Subsequently, it became clear that the questions of institutional relationships and the participation agreement would need to be addressed together. In July 1992, the Board of Supervisors directed County staff to work with all cities towards the goal of securing such an agreement. The attached draft Solid Waste Participation Agreement was developed by staff from the County and all eighteen cities, with continuous reporting to and input from both the City/County Management Association and the SANDAG Board (sitting as the AB939 Integrated Waste Management Task Force.) On February 16, 1993, it was approved in concept by the Board of Supervisors and is being formally distributed to all cities for review and comment. The Board will also hold another Solid Waste Summit on March 26, 1993 for the express purpose of being available to directly receive concerns and comments from the cities' elected officials. This report and presentation will provide for a discussion of the key issues involved in the proposed participation Agreement, in the broader context of the significant, complex and interrelated issues, events and decisions regarding San Diego's regional solid waste system. r." , ( Page 2, Item Meeting Date ~ 3/30/93 RECOMMENDATION: That Council: 1) Determine that the City is not prepared at this time to make a commitment of total flow of solid waste within its jurisdictional boundaries to the County system; 2) Direct that the County of San Diego be informed of the City's interest in assisting in short-term alternatives to the proposed bond financing of the San Marcos landfill expansion, which may include a partial commitment of waste flow, as well as the City's interest in exploring the formation of a Joint Powers Agency (JPA) for the long-term need to plan for and finance a waste disposal system; and 3) Direct staff to return to Council within two months (or that time necessary to avoid any economic penalty) for action upon the County Board's proposed Solid Waste Participation Agreement. BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION The County and all incorporated cities currently using the County's waste disposal system are at a crucial decision point. The question for all jurisdictions, including the County, is about the role we will play in the future for solid waste disposal in San Diego County. The need for change has been driven by economic, environmental and legislative factors. The decision is complicated by the reality that it is a local decision for a regional problem. The mandates of AB939 included a more involved responsibility for cities with regard to the diversion and disposal of solid waste within our jurisdiction. A key point in the decision is understanding that the City CANNOT choose status qUO-- the real question is what form the City's new and higher level of responsibility in this arena will take. Introduction The option being presented in this report is a Participation Agreement being discussed with 17 individual cities to be signed between each city and the County. In the broadest sense, it represents a "shared responsibility" approach for the County's existing and future disposal system. In exchange for the commitment of waste to the system, signatory cities will set solid waste policy and approve capital projects which drive a significant part of the overall system ("tipping") fee, as well as being guaranteed disposal capacity in the County system. /'..1- Page 3, Item Meeting Date ~ 3/30/93 The goal was to reach a consensus at the management staff level for a document which not only balanced individual cities' concerns, but would also be a viable, workable solution to most (if not all) cities' disposal needs. The timetable for approval of the Agreement is being driven by the County's need to secure $52 million in bond financing to complete the San Marcos landfill expansion. From a credit standpoint, the financing will be enhanced by a guarantee of waste flow and resulting revenues. Provisions in a Participation Agreement which would be unacceptable to the investment community may jeopardize the landfill expansion. To this end, the CCMA Committee also worked with the underwriter and bond counsel in crafting the draft document under review. Legal review through the City Attorneys' Association has also contributed to the final document and raised some outstanding legal questions which will be covered during the workshop by the City Attorney. Components of the Participation Aqreement The Table of Contents for the Agreement (Attachment A) outlines in detail the individual components. Key components highlighted for Council's attention are: 1) A Solid Waste Commission is created using the joint exerCLse of powers authority. The Commission will be composed of one elected official from each of the signatory jurisdictions. The Commission would decide major solid waste policy and would approve the Capital Improvement Program and determine what financing mechanisms would be used to fund those projects. The Commission would make recommendations to the Board of Supervisors on the Solid Waste Division's annual work program and the tipping fee changes. The Commission would not be involved in day-to-day operations of the facilities. 2) Signatory ci ties are guaranteed disposal rights in exchange for the committed waste stream. 3) The term is for twenty years with a one year rolling extension. A city may give a twenty-year notice at any time and subsequently exit the system at the end of that time with no financial penalty. Early withdrawal may be achieved by giving a five-year notice. In that case, buy-out provisions are to be determined at the time by an independent consultant and will be based on "making the system whole." " 4) Al though the Commission or County's authority cannot supersede an individual jurisdiction's land use authority, best efforts will be made to continue a subregional system of landfills ~"'..3 Page 4, Item Meeting Date ~ 3/30/93 geographically serving the northern, southern and eastern parts of the County. 5) Solid waste facility (formerly called "host") fees will be paid to those jurisdictions which have a County-operated facility wi thin their boundaries. Regional consensus is to provide the highest amount (10% of the current $28/ton tipping fee, or $2.80/ton) for landfills. Lesser amounts will be paid for material recovery facilities and transfer stations. Payment of facility fees was approved by SANDAG in September 1992. 6) An Economic Risk Surcharge will be charged to those jurisdictions that choose not to sign the Agreement but still wish to use the system. The surcharge is recommended to not exceed 50% of the tipping fee, and the exact percentage will be recommended to the Board by the time new tipping fees are brought forward on May 4, 1993. The surcharge is considered justifiable since non- participant waste flow in the system results in economic risks impacting system costs, such as a need to fund capital projects with uncertainty of the future waste supply, and reduction of the landfill capacity thereby increasing the annual closure/post- closure trust fund deposit and accelerating future facility replacement costs. 7) A non-signatory jurisdiction will be required to pay the surcharge after June 1, 1993 but may subsequently elect to join the system with no buy-in up until December 31, 1993. After this grace period, an independent consultant will determine any buy-in necessary to keep the signatory jurisdictions "whole." 8) A threshold level of participating jurisdictions will need to sign the Agreements by May 15, 1993 (or possibly June 15 or July 1) in order to provide a level of participation by the cities that would allow for a viable regional system. The threshold is defined as a number of cities with a combined population equivalent to that of the unincorporated area of the County. 9) The City of San Diego will become an ex-officio member of the Commission and will enter into a modified Participation Agreement with the County to reflect the mutually beneficial working relationship of the Miramar Landfill and the County landfill system. A recently revised list of key dates (and any proposed changes) affecting the Participation Agreement is included in Attachment B. (,..tj Page 5, Item Meeting Date ~ 3/30/93 Outstandinq Leqal Issues The City Attorney's Association has issued a statement of concerns (Attachment C) on the draft Agreement as it is currently proposed. The City Attorney will address those concerns during the presentation of this issue. Impacts on the Rate Paver The recent management and financial audit of the Solid Waste Enterprise Fund (copies of the Executive Summary were distributed to Council in December 1992) quantified and described the magnitude of the necessary increases in tipping fees to fund the current and future facility needs. Tipping fees in San Diego County have increased from $8/ton to $28/ton over the last six years. Although this is a significant increase, the current fees are below most fees across the nation. Those involved in the solid waste industry in San Diego have been aware that serious increases would eventually be necessary and the audit has clarified the point. At the present time, it appears that the most conservative increase the system could sustain effective July 1993 would be approximately $15 to $17/ton, or a change from $28 to $43-$45/ton. This increase would impact a single-family household's monthly trash bill in the range of $1.50 to $2.50/month. Subsequent annual increases could put the tipping fee up to $60 or $65/ton. Under the provisions of the proposed Participation Agreement, the actual increases will largely be determined by the policy decisions made by the Solid Waste Commission regarding capital projects needed for long term system planning and the financing methods chosen. Possible Disposal Alternatives to the Participation Aqreement There are a number of possible alternatives currently being discussed around the County although none will be available by July 1, 1993. In addition, these options may not offer reliable alternatives in the near future (particularly to South Bay cities) because of varying degrees of location, project completion, environmental obstacles, or commitment limitations. The following brief description of alternatives being discussed has been compiled from the experiences of other cities in the County: 1) Rail haul to Utah- A recent offer to haul waste by rail from the North County to a private landfill in East Carbon, Utah is currently being reviewed by a coalition of North County cities. The East Carbon Development Corporation (ECDC) declines to quote comparable tipping fees and transport costs without formal negotiations. More information would be needed about the viability of hauling waste from South Bay, length of commitment, etc. I,~s Page 6, Item Meeting Date (p 3/30/93 2) Campo Indian Reservation- This option would require a transfer station and rail or truck haul. Litigation is likely from the residents surrounding the Reservation since groundwater is the only source of potable water for the area. Conservative estimates indicate 1 1/2 years as the earliest time the new landfill could be available, barring serious litigation. 3) Eaale Mountain. Riverside Countv- This proposed landfill at the former Kaiser Steel mine is presently in the State permitting process and is not expected to be available for several years, assuming environmental concerns and threatened litigation are overcome. If it becomes available, transport issues and facility costs need to be explored. 4) Rail Cvcle to San Bernardino Countv- There is a proposal to site a landfill in Amboy which has not yet been approved by San Bernardino County and would be about one to two years behind 'Eagle Mountain's schedule. 5) Oranae Countv- The landfill located in San Juan Capistrano has an extraordinary lifespan and officials are actively seeking imported waste from the Los Angeles area. Several North County cities have seriously pursued this alternative as possibly the most viable since tipping fees and host fees are quoted as $32.50/ton. However, this does not include processing and transfer costs, and the landfill operator will only offer a five year agreement for capacity. For South County consideration, transport would again be an issue. An additional concept was discussed by the CCMA Committee during the development of the Participation Agreement: these future opportunities could be pursued and evaluated by the Solid Waste Commission if they, indeed, presented reasonable, cost-effective alternatives to be programmed in to the long term solid waste plan for San Diego County. Timina and Oraanizational Alternatives The magnitude of the decisions required of a city in approving this Agreement has prompted a number of cities to ask for more time to understand the nature of the commitment, possible alternatives, or to make further recommendations to the Agreement in order to reach regional consensus. As stated above, the timing for a decision on the Participation Agreement is being driven by the County's need to issue debt service for the San Marcos landfill expansion. Recent discussions between the CCMA and the City Attorneys' Association have elevated concerns of most cities that the Participation Agreement represents a long-term commitment for an immediate short-term problem (bond financing for the San Marcos landfill) as well as the longer-range problem of meeting the to-I, Page 7, Item Meeting Date (p 3/30/93 cities' and the region's future waste disposal needs. If opportunities can be determined to assist the County in securing financing for the San Marcos issue (through partial flow commitment, alternative financing mechanisms, etc.), it is felt that both the cities and the County will be afforded more time to address the long-term impact of the proposal. Additionally, since the time that the participation Agreement was drafted by staff and approved in concept by the Board of Supervisors, there has been significant discussion that the formation of a Joint Powers Agency (JPA) would address many of the concerns being raised now by elected officials. Conclusions The decision that Chula Vista, our neighbor cities and the County are now struggling with is the role we are going to play in solid waste management in both the short and long term future. In the past, the County has chosen to own and operate a regional waste disposal system. Rates based on land acquisition costs from years ago were reasonably low and maintained systemwide. There was no economic incentive to seek other choices. Flow control was not necessary. Then landfill capacity diminished, environmental regulations and concerns increased dramatically, land prices soared and the political reality of being unable to site landfills close to urban centers set in. In 1989, the Legislature passed the California Integrated Waste Management Act (AB939) which set a hierarchy for reducing, reusing and recycling before landfilling waste. Mandated, progressive and increasingly comprehensive recycling and composting programs are helping and necessary, but they cannot change the need for the decision now at hand. Waste stream control is not a new concept in the United States, although regional participation is on the"cutting edge." The long term consequences for the County remain to be seen if sufficient interest is not shown in the Participation Agreements. There is a potential loss to the system of capacity in North County at San Marcos if the expansion is hinde.red by the financing mechanism which, in turn, may result from inability to guarantee flow/revenues. As a result of AB939, the City has an elevated responsibility for the diversion and disposal of its own waste. As a result of numerous events in San Diego County's regional waste disposal arena, the City is now being asked to become a partner in the system. That action would be one of accepting the system as it is now with a commitment to actively participate in the planning and implementation of a system to most efficiently and cost-effectively vr7 Page 8, Item Meeting Date {p 3/30/93 meet the needs of all its partners. The benefits of regional cooperation and participation in this complicated issue should not be underestimated and either dismissed or entered into lightly. Although much time and effort has gone into the proposed Agreement, it may be in the best interests of all parties to continue to work together but to separate the short and long-term problems: first, working towards a short-term solution to the San Marcos expansion financing problem, and finally, towards the more concrete determination of long-term planning partners through a JPA. FISCAL IMPACT: There is no fiscal impact as a result of Council's action on this report, which is being presented for information and general policy direction. At the time that action on the proposed Participation Agreement is taken, however, there are several impacts which will be revisited, but are indicated at this stage in the decision-making process: 1) Regarding future disposal system service costs resulting from the subsequent decision to sign (or not sign) the Participation Agreement, that decision would not be expected to have a direct fiscal impact on the City since solid waste system charges are paid directly by the rate payer through the hauler. Any Economic Risk Surcharge (above the system disposal fee) resulting from a decision to not sign the Agreement, would be expected to be paid by the rate payer. 2) A subsequent decision to not sign the Participation Agreement may impact the City's ability to collect ongoing solid waste facility (host) fees currently estimated at approximately $1,500,000 in FY 1993-94. 3) At some point in the future, there may also be direct City costs for the staffing and expertise needed to ensure adequate waste disposal opportunities if the City does not choose to remain in the system, depending on the alternative course of action chosen. 4) If Chula Vista leaves the County waste disposal system, the City does not escape its responsibility to pay its fair share of closure and post-closure costs for landfills used in the past by Chula Vista. This would be a significant but unknown cost either to the rate payers or to the City's waste management system. b,a/'d "'QJ~i~'f"-*'O'" ~~~ TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Parties.. II. Recitals. III. Definition section. . . . IV. Conditions Precedent, Effective Date. V. E. F. G. H. I. J. Agreement. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . A. Establishment of Solid Waste Commission . 1- 2. 3. Creation and Membership. Authority. . . . Purpose. . ... . . . . . B. Commission Structure; Voting; Administration. 1- 2. 3. 4. 5. By-Laws. . . . . Quorum and Vote. Weighted Vote. . . Solid Waste Management Commission Staff. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Committee. C. Commission Approval Authority. 1- 2. Powers and Duties. . . . . Emergency and Other Exceptions. D. Commission Review and Recommendation Authority. , Reservation of Powers and Responsibilities. No Authority to Breach County Contract. . . Commission Maintenance of Subregional Landfill System. . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . Commission Duty to Provide Capacity. Allocation of Closure and Post Closure Costs. No Obligation to Non-Signatory cities. '-It) Paqe 1 1 2 5 6 6 6 6 6 7 7 7 7 8 8 8 8 9 10 10 11 11 11 11 11 \ . V o. P. Q. K. L. M. TABLE OF CONTENTS Flow Control Obligations. . . . . . . . . . . . . 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Delivery of Acceptable Waste to the System. Waste Flow Enforcement. Power to Exercise Flow Control. Consistency of Agreements. . . . Exception for Recycling Activities. Paqe 11 11 12 12 13 13 13 13 14 14 15 15 15 15 15 15 16 16 16 17 17 17 18 18 18 21 21 23 23 23 23 . . . . . . . . . County's Duties. . . . . . . . . . . . . 1- 2. 3. Guaranteed Disposal. . . . Financial Statement and Management Audit. Implementation of Policies and Plans Adopted by the Commission. . . . . . . . Amendments to the Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan. San Diego Agreement. . . . . 4. 5. Mutual Duties of County and City. N. 1- 2. 3. Participation in Commission. Land Use Permits. Regional Waste Stream. System Financing. . 1- 2. 3. 4. 5. Tip Fee Charge. Non-Signatory City: Economic Risk Surcharge. . . . . . . . . . Grace Period/Buy-In Provisions~ Solid Waste Facility Fee. Mitigation Fee. Term. . . . . . 1- 2. Automatic Renewal Provision. Early Termination. Liability. 1- 2. . . . . . . Operating Facilities and Future Facilities. Non-Operating Facilities Newly Incorporated cities. 1- 2. Ninety Days to Approve Agreement. . Terms and Conditions of Incorporation t.,...(( VI. A. C. D. E. F. TABLE OF CONTENTS Miscellaneous. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Rights of Holders of System Obligations. B. Notices. . . . . . . . . . . . . Entitlement to Subsequent Notices. Entire Agreement. . . Authority of Parties. Option to Include More Beneficial provisions in Other Agreements. . . ~ ,.. / Dl.. Paae 24 24 ". 24 25 25 25 25 25 25 25 26 26 26 26 26 I 7 February 16, 1993 AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF AND THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO CONCERNING DELIVERY OF SOLID WASTE TO COUNTY FACILITIES AND THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE SAN DIEGO COUNTY SOLID WASTE COMMISSION ("Participation Agreement") I. Parties. This Agreement ("Agreement"), dated as of February 16, 1993 for the purposes of reference only and effective according to its terms after execution between the city of , a municipal corporation of the State of California ("City"), and the County of San Diego ("County"), is made with reference to the following facts: II. Recitals. A. The County currently owns or leases and operates, directly and through contracts, a solid waste management and disposal system, consisting of landfills, resource recovery facilities, transfer stations and other facilities used for transportation, management and disposal of solid wastes. These facilities are referred to as the "Operating Facilities" and listed in Exhibit I. The County is, or may come to be, fully or partially responsible for closing, remediating, monitoring and/or maintaining certain former solid waste disposal facilities which no longer accept wastes for disposal. These facilities, which mayor may not currently be owned by the County, are referred to as the "Non-operating Facilities." , The County proposes to design, construct, own and/or operate additional solid waste management and disposal facilities in the future. These facilities are referred to as the "}<'uture Facilities." The Operating Facilities, Non-operating Facilities and the Future Facilities may COllectively be referred to as the "System." B. The California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 (Public Resources Code SS 40000 et seq.) caused cities and counties in California to address solid waste disposal through methods other than primarily landfilling, as was done in the past. Many of the alternate integrated solid waste methods use more capital-intensive approaches, such as recycling, resource recovery, and composting; and, 1 /0' -1.3 \) C. To support financing for the current operation and future expansion of the County Solid Waste System, the County System must be able to rely on a consistent amount of Solid Waste: and, D. Residents of city, including both individual, business and public entities (including City itself), generate various forms of waste material, including Solid Waste: and, E. city has let a franchise or made other arrangements for the collection and disposal of its Solid Waste: and, F. City has agreed that disposal of certain city Solid Waste which is legally acceptable for disposal at a Class III landfill under such laws or regulations as are in effect at the time of disposal shall be disposed of at the County's Operating Facilities and Future Facilities, as more fully described and under the terms and conditions set forth herein, and G. The County has agreed to permit city, and other cities within the County other than the City of San Diego, to participate in certain management and pl~nning decisions, as more fully described and under the terms and conditions set forth herein. Now, therefore, the parties hereto agree as follows: III. Definition Section. A. Acceptable Waste. not Self-Hauled Waste or governmental body. That portion of Solid Waste which is Solid Waste generated by any other B. County. Agreement. This Agreement between the City and the C. Annual Budget. The County's annual budget for the Solid Waste Enterprise Fund and the, County's Department of' Public Works, Solid Waste Division, or its successor. D. Capacity. The volume of available space or processing capability for which the System has currently, or at any given time in the future, received its Facility operating permits. E. Capital Improvement Plan. A plan for the establishment, repair, replacement, improvement, or retirement of Facilities in the system, other than normal maintenance of the Facilities, and for acquisitions of interests in real property in excess of $500,000 with funds from, or debt secured, by the Solid Waste Enterprise Fund, in accordance with the Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan. F. City. As defined in Section I of this Agreement. 2 ""If G. City Haulers. Privately owned companies employees engaged in the collection and transportation Waste within City, in an average amount in excess of 50 month, calculated annually. H. Commission. The San Diego County Solid Waste Commission as formed by this Agreement. or Ci ty of Solid tons per I. County. The County of San Diego, a political subdivision of the State of california and party to this Agreement. J. County Haulers. Privately owned companies or County employees engaged in the collection and transportation of Solid Waste within the unincorporated area of the County of San Diego, in an average amount in excess of 50 tons per month, calculated annually. K. Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan, or "CIWMP." The plan prepared and adopted pursuant to Public Resources Code SS 41750 et sea. for the management, transportation and disposal of Solid Waste within the Region. L. Agencies V.N.2. Economic Risk Surcharge. The amount assessed Non-Member after June 1, 1993, as determined according to Section M. Effective Date. The date on which all of the conditions precedent set forth in Section IV. of this Agreement have been satisfied. N. Facility. An individual collection, processing, transfer or disposal unit of the System, including Non-Operating Facilities, Operating Facilities and Future Facilities. [ o. Facility Fees. Fees paid pursuant to Section V.N.4. of this Agreement. Also referred to as "Solid Waste Facility Fees." P. Facilities. Two or more individual units of the System. Q. Financing Plan. The determination of. the types of financing that will be required to pay for implementation of the Capital Improvement Plan, including short-term and long-term indebtedness. R. Flow Control Covenant. That portion of this Agreement, Section IV.K., requiring Member Agencies to direct or cause to be directed their Acceptable Waste to the System. S. Future Facilities. As defined in Section II. A. of the Agreement. 3 ",..IS- T. Member Agency. Any city within the County that has signed a Participation Agreement, or the County, but not a city with which a Participation Agreement has been terminated for any reason. U. Member Agency Acceptable Waste. Acceptable Waste generated within the geographical boundaries of the Member Agency. With respect to the County, the geographical boundaries referred to in this definition shall be limited to the unincorporated area of the Region. V. Member City. Any city that has signed a Participation Agreement with the County of San Diego. W. Non-Operating Facilities. As defined in Section II. A. of this Agreement. x. Non-Signatory city. Any city within the County that does not sign a Participation Agreement with the County, or a city with which this Agreement has been terminated for any reason. Y. Operating Facilities. As defined in section II. A. of this Agreement. z. Participation Agreements. Agreements executed between the County and Member cities which are substantially identical to this Agreement. AA. Processing. Reduction, separation, conversion, or recycling of Solid Waste. recovery, AB. Ratepayers. Residents of City, or of the unincorporated area, including both individual, business and public entities. AC. Recycling Residue. That portion of the Solid Waste stream which results from the processing of recyclable materials or Solid Waste. ' -- AD. Region. The entire geographical area of the County of San Diego, including all incorporated areas. AE. Regular Vote. A method of voting by the Commission, in which each Member Agency has one vote. AF. Self-hauled Waste. ~nd transported or disposed County Hauler. Solid Waste generated by any person of by other than a City Hauler or a 4 (p.. {b AG. Solid Waste. Waste which is garbage, refuse, waste and other matter which is legally acceptable at a Class III landfill pursuant to California Code of Regulations Title 23, Subchapter 15 or under such laws or regulations as are in effect at the time of disposal. AH. Solid Waste Enterprise Fund. An existing fund, separate from the County's General Fund, established and held by the County separate from its other funds and accounts for receipts and disbursements in connection with the System, established pursuant to Government Code S 25261. AI. Solid Waste Facility Fees. See definition of Facility Fees. AJ. System. Operating Facilities, Non-operating Facilities, and Future Facilities. AK. System Agreement. System Agreement means any obligation of the County at any time existing under any applicable law or any contract, lease, loan or other agreement with any person relating to or affecting the System, the Participation Agreements or the Solid Waste Enterprise Fund, including without limitation all System Obligations. AL. System Obligation. System Obligation means all bonds, notes, certificates or other obligations issued by any person to finance capital or other costs of the System and the resolutions, ordinances, indentures and other authorization instruments under which such obligations were issued. AM. Tip Fee. The fee charged by the County for disposal or Processing of Solid Waste at Facilities. IV. Conditions Precedent, Effective Date. , If the following conditions are met by May 15, 1993, the rights and duties between city and the County as are set forth in this Agreement shall exist; otherwise they shall be of no further force and effect whatsoever. . A. Threshold Level of Participation: A number of cities, excluding the City of San Diego, which have a combined population equal to or greater than the population of the unincorporated area of the County shall have executed and thereby agreed to the terms of this Agreement. For the purpose of this section, the population of each jurisdiction is that which was reported by the San Diego Association of Governments ("SANDAG") on July 1, 1992, as shown on Exhibit II. 5 ~ -/7 B. Execution of this Agreement shall be authorized by a majority vote of the legislative body of city. . The date upon which these conditions precedent are met shall be the effective date of this Agreement. V. Agreement. As soon as feasible after the effective date, pursuant to Section IV., the County will notify all Member Agencies that the conditions precedent have been satisfied and the following shall be the rights and duties between the parties: A. Establishment of Solid Waste Commission. 1. Creation and Membership. There is hereby created the San Diego County Solid Waste Commission. The Commission shall consist of one member from the County of San Diego and one member from each Member City. The County member shall be a member of the Board of Supervisors and the cities I members shall be members of their respective City Councils. All Commission Members shall be appointed by their respective governing bodies. A member of the San Diego City Council may serve as an ex-officio non-voting member. . The County or a Member City may select a Commission alternate from among the group from which Commission Members may be selected, who may attend Commission meetings, and act in all regards as the Commission Member from that Member Agency in the absence of the Commission Member. 2. Authori ty . The parties to this Agreement are jointly exercising powers common to each of them under the authority .of the Joint Exercise of Powers Act as contained in Government. Code Section 6500; et sea. In exercising such common powers, the Hall'.ber Agencies shall individually and collectively act in accordance with Applicable Law. 3. Purpose. The purpose of this Agreement is to provide for the long term management of Solid Waste generated within Member cities and within the unincorporated areas of the County. 6 \,,11' B. Commission structure; Voting; Administration. L By-Laws. The Commission shall adopt by-laws that are consistent with and implement the provisions of this Agreement to govern their internal operation including, but not limited to, electing officers, procedures for calling special meetings, taking minutes, establishing regular meeting dates, establishing a dispute resolution process consistent with the terms and conditions of this Agreement and reimbursement of reasonable and necessary expenses from the Solid Waste Enterprise Fund as authorized by the Commission. The Commission shall be subject to the Ralph M. Brown Act (Gov. Code SS 54950 et sea.). a. The Commission shall meet at least twice a year on established regular meeting dates. . b. Special meetings may be called at the request of three Commission members with a minimum of 72 hours notice to all Commission members. 2. Quorum and Vote. a. A majority of constitute a quorum. A quorum must any items before the Commission. . the Member Agencies shall be present to take action on b. The Commission shall vote on all items on the basis of one vote per Member Agency ("Regular Vote"). Actions shall be determined by a majority vote of Member Agencies. If three Member Agencies request a "Weighted Vote" after voting on any particular item, then in that event a Weighted Vote, which will be final and binding, shall be taken. 3. Weighted Vote. , Weighted votes are to be based on the population of each Member Agency as reported by SANDAG on July 1 of each year. When the Weighted Vote is taken there shall be a total of one hundred votes. Each Member Agency shall have that number of votes determined by the apportionment formula, set forth in Exhibit III, provided that each Member Agency shall have at least one vote, no Member Agency shall have more than 40 votes and there shall be no fractional vote. . When a Weighted Vote is taken, the vote of at least one- third of the Member Agencies, representing not less than fifty-one percent (51%) of the total Weighted Vote shall be required to supersede the Regular Vote. If the Weighted Vote fails, action determined by the Regular Vote shall stand. 7 /..., .../'7 4. Solid Waste Management Committee. A Solid Waste Management Committee consisting of the Chief Administrator/Manager of each Member Agency, or designee is hereby formed. This Committee shall provide staff review, analysis and make recommendations on all material being forwarded to the Commission. The City Manager of the city of San Diego, or designee, may serve as an eX-Officio, non-voting member. A representative of the San Diego County Disposal Association may serve as an Advisory/Liaison non-voting member. 5. Commission Staff. The County Solid Waste Division of the Department of Public Works, or its successors, shall function as the staff for the Commission. C. Commission Approval Authority. 1. Powers and Duties. The County and City hereby acknowledge that, except as provided in Section V.C.2, the Commission shall have the following duties, rights, powers and responsibilities set forth in this Section, and that any decision lawfully taken hereunder by the Commission in accordance with ,procedures set forth in this Agreement shall be final and binding on the County and other Member Agencies: a. Improvement Plan; The establishment of the five year Capital b. The review of the Capital Improvement least annually, and, if necessary in the judgment Commission, modification of the Capital Improvement Plan; Plan at of the . c. The establishment of the Financing Plan; d. The review of the Financing Plan at least <:-nnually, and, if necessary 'in the judgment of the Commission, modification of the Financing Plan; , e. The selection and approval alternative sites for Future Facilities, subject to land use authority of the appropriate agencies; of preferred the permit and f. The use of any Solid Waste disposal technology or system other than sanitary landfilling for the disposal of Acceptable Waste; g. The disposal of Member Agency Acceptable Waste outside the System, consistent with the Service Covenant; 8 t,->>; h. The funding of the County office recycling program, code enforcement in the unincorporated areas of the County, or the household hazardous waste collection program through the Tip Fee; i. The decision whether to participate in a Solid Waste management/processing facility at Donovan State Prison; j. The awarding of Technical Assistance Program Grants: k. The determination of how recycling credits achieved by the System for use. of the North County Resource Recovery Associates recycling facility at the San Marcos Landfill would be spread among Member Agencies for purposes of complying with state-mandated recycling objectives: 1. The determination of whether and how costs should be distributed between cities. which are substantially developed and cities which are not substantially developed, such as landfill closure and post closure costs and costs for new Capacity required by growth in the wastestream. within six months of its establishment, the Commission shall select and the County shall retain a consultant to address this "equity" issue. The Solid Waste Enterprise Fund shall pay for the costs of said consultant. The Commission shall consider in good faith various alternatives to address this issue, determine the most appropriate mechanisms to resolve the issue, and recommend to the Member Agencies the appropriate resolution: m. The determination of the amount of the Economic Risk Surcharge to be assessed, in accordance with Section V.N.2. of this Agreement: n. The determination of the "buy-in" restrictions, in accordance with Section V.N.3. of this Agreement; o. The determination of the appropriate charges or penalties to be assessed against Member Agencies for leaving the commission to the extent such determination is not in conflict with the terms and conditions of this Agreement: and p. The timing of management audits to be conducted pursuant to Section V.L.2. of this Agreement. 2. Emergency and Other Exceptions. The approval of the Commission shall not be required for any action which the County determines, in its good faith judgment, is required to be taken by the County to allow the County to (a) comply with applicable law, this Agreement, or any System Agreement, (b) to mitigate or remedy the consequences of any 9 {."J-/ emergency condition, natural disaster or other uncontrollable circumstance or (cl to prosecute, defend or settle any litigation against the County. In the event the County determines that it is necessary to take any such action without the approval of the Commission, which approval would be required by the terms of this Section but for the provisions of this subsection, the County shall notify the Commission in writing of its determination and the reasons therefor. The County shall, to the extent practicable in the circumstances, take into account the matters raised by the Commission in any written response to the County's notice. . D. Commission Review and Recommendation Authority. The Commission may from time to time review and make recommendations to the County Board of Supervisors regarding the following policy and implementation matters, which are the ultimate responsibility of the County: 1. Formulation and implementation of siting elements of the Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan. 2. Formulation and implementation of the annual work plan for the Department of Public Works, Solid Waste Division, or its successors, 3. Formulation and implementation of the Annual Budget, 4. Changes in the Tip Fee, 5. The awarding of Tonnage Grants to cities for the curbside collection of recyclable materials, 6. The determination of whether Future Facilities shall be County-owned or privately owned, other issues may be brought before the Commission for their review and recommendation to the Board of Supervisors by a request of three Commission Members. E. Reservation of Powers and Responsibilities. Any powers not explicitly transferred to the Commission by this Agreement are reserved to the County. In addition, the approval of the Commission shall not be required with respect to the approximately $53.2 million already approved by the County Board of Supervisors for financing the San Marcos Landfill Expansion, acquiring the Vista Transfer Station, acquiring the Ramona Buffer Zone, or acquiring the San Ysidro Burn Site. 10 , ' ;.. 2.. F. No Authority to Breach System Agreement. The powers of the Commission shall not be exercised in such a way as to cause a breach or default by the County under any System Agreement. Existing System Agreements, exclusive of litigation settlements, are set forth on Exhibit IV. However, the Commission may request the County to amend, modify, revoke or terminate any System Agreement with a third party provided the Commission has approved financing all costs associated with said amendment, modification, revocation or termination. Upon receipt of such request, the County will use good faith, including incurring Solid Waste Enterprise Fund expense proposed for financing, to amend, modify, revoke or terminate such system Agreement and the County shall advise the Commission of its efforts and progress in such matters. G. Commission Maintenance of Subregional Landfill System. In adopting the Capital Improvement Plan and Financing Plan, and in establishing major policies, the Commission shall to the extent possible maintain at least three landfills, one for each major subregion of the County (North, East and South). H. Commission Duty to Provide Capacity. The Commission shall, during the term of this Agreement, and to the extent possible provide sufficient Capacity for all Member Agencies to allow the disposal of their Acceptable Waste in the System. I. Allocation of Closure and Post Closure Costs. As to those Non-Signatory cities, or Member Cities which have left the System, the Commission shall require, through tip fees, buyout charges, or otherwise, each such city to pay for its proportionate share of closure and post closure costs. J. No Obligation to Non-Signatory cities. To the extent allowable under applicable state and federal laws and regulations, neither the County nor the 'commission is obligated to provide Solid Waste management facilities and services to Non-Signatory cities. K. Flow Control Obligations. 1. Delivery of Acceptable Waste to the System. The City and the County each shall deliver or cause to be delivered all Acceptable Waste generated within their respective jurisdictions to such Facilities within the System as County shall reasonably designate (Flow Control Covenant). For purposes of this section, the County's jurisdiction shall be deemed to consist of the unincorporated area. 11 ~23 2. Waste Flow Enforcement. The City and the County each shall establish, implement and carry out a waste flow enforcement program which is sufficient to assure compliance with the Flow Control Covenant. This program may include to the extent necessary and appropriate in the circumstances, but shall not be limited to, (1) licensing, permitting or franchising haulers (on an exclusive 'or nonexclusive basis), upon the condition of compliance with the Flow Control Covenant, (2) adopting ordinances or resolutions requiring compliance with the Flow Control Covenant, and (3) taking enforcement actions under any such license, permit, franchise, ordinance or resolution. Direct municipal collection of Acceptable Waste shall not be required hereunder unless all other available means and methods of enforcing the Flow Control Covenant have been unsuccessful. If any event or circumstance (including without limitation a change or adverse interpretation of applicable law) impairs or precludes compliance with the Flow Control Covenant by the means or methods then being employed by the affected party, such party shall implement alternative or substitute means and methods to enable it to lawfully satisfy the terms and conditions of the Flow Control Covenant. If a change or interpretation in applicable law impairs or precludes either party from complying with the Flow Control Covenant by any means, such party shall use its best efforts, to the extent practicable and subject to indemnification by the County as provided in paragraph 3 below, to effectuate executive, legislative or judicial change in or relief from the applicability of such law so as to enable City lawfully to. resume compliance with the Flow Control Covenant as soon as possible following such change or interpretation of applicable law. Compliance by the affected party with its obligations under this paragraph shall be deemed sufficient to satisfy the its obligation to enforce the Flow Control Covenant. 3. Power to Exercise Flow Control. , The affected party represents that it has the right, power and authority under applicable law to enter.into, comply with, implement and enforce the Flow Control Covenant. Each party shall use good faith and best efforts to preserve, protect and defend its right and power to enter into, comply with, implement and enforce the Flow Control Covenant in accordance herewith against any challenge thereto, legal or otherwise (including any lawsui ts by or against such party, whether as plaintiff or defendant) by any person based upon breach of contract, violation of law or any other theory. If ~ny such challenge raises issues common to the Member Agencies under the Participation Agreements, an adverse outcome of which may have a material and adverse effect on the System as determined by the Commission, the County through the Solid Waste Enterprise Fund shall indemnify and hold harmless the affected party from the reasonable costs, fees and expenses properly allocable to defending such right and power. 12 (,'2.~ 4. Consistency of Agreements. As soon as practicable after the Effective Date, all licenses, permits, contracts, agreements, leases, franchises, ordinances and resolutions of the affected party which are lawfully in effect with or pertaining to any person relating to or affecting Acceptable Waste shall, if and to the extent necessary, be amended to provide explicitly that the affected party shall have the right without material restriction to direct the delivery of all Acceptable Waste to the System in accordance with the Flow Control Covenant. On and after the Effective Date, the affected party shall not enter into, issue or adopt any license, permit, contract, agreement, lease, franchise, ordinance or resolution which is materially inconsistent with the Flow Control Covenant. 5. Exception for Recycling Activities. Notwithstanding any provision of this Agreement to the contrary, each Member Agency shall have the right, without penalty, to recycle (as defined at Public Resource Code S 40180) any Solid Waste (as defined at Public Resources Code S 40191) by any means selected by the Member Agency and any such recycled material shall be excluded from the commitment otherwise made to the System by this Agreement. However, if the residue of the recycling process which can legally be disposed of at a Class III landfill exceeds five percent (5%) of such recycled material, such process residue shall be returned to the System for disposal unless exempted by the County. L. County's Duties. 1. Guaranteed Disposal. a. Service Covenant. (1) The County, through the-- Solid Waste Enterprise Fund, shall continue to provide or cause to be provided the service of management, handling and disposal of all Solid Waste generated within the Region for Member Agencies (the "Service Covenant"). The County shall carry cut this Service Covenant through the System, including but not limited to the construction and operation of Facilities, through the use of County agreements, using such technologies and upon such terms and conditions as the County determines, consistent with the decisions of the Commission, and in a manner which will not impair the ability of the County to comply with this Service Covenant. 13 " ,~~ (2) Nothing in this Agreement shall be deemed to prohibit or preclude the County through the Solid Waste Enterprise Fund from providing management, handling and disposal of Solid Waste generated outside of the Region or preclude the County from disposing of Member Agency generated Solid Waste at disposal Facilities located outside the Region; provided that the County will not provide such Solid Waste management, handling and disposal services that would have an adverse effect on the County's ability to meet its obligations related to this Service Covenant. b. Compliance with Service Covenant. The obligation of the County to observe and comply with this Service Covenant shall apply continuously and without interruption for so long as this Agreement is in effect. The County will not adopt an ordinance or resolution or take other official action that breaches the obligations of the County under this Agreement. If any event or circumstance (including without limitation a force majeure event) or a change or adverse interpretation of applicable law impairs or precludes compliance with this covenant by the means or methods then being employed by the County, the County shall implement alternative or substitute means and methods to enable it to satisfy the terms and conditions of this covenant. In the event that a change in applicable law impairs or precludes the County from complying with this covenant with the means or methods then being employed and from utilizing alternate or substitute means or methods of compliance, the County shall continuously use its best efforts, to the extent practicable, to effectuate executive, legislative or judicial change in or relief from the applicability of such law so as to enable the County lawfully to resume compliance with this covenant as soon as possible following the change in applicable law. .The exercise of such best efforts by the County under such circumstances shall be deemed to be sufficient to satisfy this Service Covenant. 2. Financial Statement and Management Audit. , The County shall provide to the Commission an annual financial statement of the Solid Waste Enterprise Fund. The Commission shall select and the County shall retain a consultant to do a management audit on a schedule as determined by the Commission. 3. Implementation of Policies and Plans Adopted by the Commission. County shall implement the policies, Capital Improvement Plans and Financing Plan made or adopted by the Commission to the extent that such decisions and plans are within the authority of the Commission, and to the extent that they are consistent with the Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan. 14 b~l~ 4. Amendments to the Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan. The County shall initiate any amendments to the Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan necessary to implement the decisions of the Commission. 5. San Diego Agreement. The County will negotiate a separate agreement with the City of San Diego which reflects the City of San Diego's unique role in regional waste management issues. Such agreement will be brought before the Commission for review and comment prior to adoption. M. Mutual Duties of County and City. 1. Participation in Commission. County and City agrees to participate in good faith in the activities of the Commission, and in such a manner that conforms to the spirit, intent and general premises of this Agreement. 2. Land Use Permits. Nothing in this Agreement obligating the County or a city to grant facility. shall be construed as a permit for a Solid Waste County shall use good faith and in full cooperation with the policy direction of the Commission, to obtain such Permits as are necessary to provide sufficient Capacity in the most economical manner available to meet the ~olid Waste disposal needs of the Member Agencies. , 3. Regional Waste stream. On the condition that the Commission and County are attempting in good faith to implement the subregional landfill objective, a Member Agency shall not object to the direction of Acceptable Waste to any Facility based on geographic origin. 15 '-;'1 N. System Financing. 1. Tip Fee Charge. a. Tip Fee to Member Agency. The Tip Fee charged by the County for the disposal of Acceptable Waste within the System shall be sufficient to fund the reasonable and necessary costs for operation, management and financing of the System. Such costs include, but are not limited to: design, planning, construction, acquisition, operations, maintenance, replacement, repair, management, administration, closure and. monitoring of Operating Facilities, Non-operating Facilities and Future Facilities, State required reserves for development of replacement facilities consistent with the Capital Improvement and Financing Plans and closure of Non-operating Facilities; Facility Fees; Mitigation Fees; recycling programs; household hazardous waste programs; liabilities, judgments and settlement payments; indemnities payable under any Participation Agreement or other System Agreement; development of Future Facilities for the safe and sanitary management of solid wastes consistent with the Capital Improvement and Financing Plans; and all other costs of the System required to be paid under any System Agreement. b. Other Facility Tip Fees. The Tip Fee charged by the County for the disposal of Member Agency Acceptable Waste at similar types of facilities shall be the same as charged for Solid Waste generated from the unincorporated area of the County. In addition, Tip Fees for Facilities accepting similar types of waste (for instance, Solid Waste, yard or "green" waste, or tires) shall be the same regardless of location. 2. Non-Signatory City: Economic Risk Surcharge. County agrees to assess a surcharge beginning June 1, 1993 on Solid Waste from any city which does not sign this Agreement. From June 1, 1993 to June 1, 1994 the surcharge shall not exceed fifty percent (50%) of the Tip Fee in effect at the time of the transaction. After that time, the Commission shall annually review and determine the Economic Risk Surcharge. For the purpose of this calculation the Tip Fee does not include the Solid Waste Facility Fee or the Mitigation Fee. The surcharge is a method to offset any increased costs to the system and account for any economic risks created by the Non-Signatory City continuing to use the System. The criteria used to establish the Economic Risk SurCharge include but are not limited to: capital charges, the increased depletion rate of landfill capacity and timing effects. The surcharge shall only be used to pay for the costs of the operation, management and financing of the System. 16 ~, .Lf 3. Grace Period/Buy-In Provisions. Until December 31, 1993, Non-Signatory cities may determine to sign this Agreement without condition or penalty. However, during this grace period, Non-Signatory cities shall pay the Economic Risk Surcharge and shall be ineligible to participate in decision making. After December 31, 1993 the Commission shall determine under what conditions Non-Signatory cities shall be allowed to sign this Agreement. 4. Solid Waste Facility Fee. a. The jurisdiction in which a Facility is located shall be paid a Facility Fee for each ton of waste delivered for Processing at such Facility. The Facility Fee shall initially be set at an amount equivalent to the appropriate percentage for the facility type (as described below), as that percentage of the Tip Fee in effect on January 1, 1993. Thereafter, the Facility Fee shall be adjusted automatically and concurrently with any increase in the Tip Fee, by an amount equal to the percentage increase in the Tip Fee but not greater than five percent (5%) of the then current Facility Fee, whichever is less. b. Facility types and percentage of the Tip Fee* (In effect on January 1, 1993): o Landfill = 10% of Tip Fee ($2.80) o Mixed Solid Waste Material Recovery Facility = 7.5% of Tip Fee ($2.10) o Transfer Station = 5% of Tip Fee ($1.40) *For the purpose of the calculation in this section, the Tip Fee does not include the Facility Fee or the Mitigation Fee. If a jurisdiction has more than one Facility at the same location, or contiguous location, it, would receive ~he higher of the applicable Facility Fees, but not more than one Facility Fee. c. The Facility Fee for all Future Facilities shall be the Facility Fee for that type facility as of January 1, 1993 with adjustments as described in subsection a, above. 5. Mitigation Fee. Commencing July 1, 1993 the County agrees to collect as part of the Tip Fee a Mitigation Fee which is five percent (5%) of the Tip Fee in effect on January 1, 1993. Thereafter, the Mitigation Fee shall be adjusted automatically and concurrently with any increase in the Tip Fee, by an amount equal to the percentage increase in the Tip Fee or an amount not greater than five percent (5%) of the then current Mitigation Fee, whichever is less. 17 "'.2.'1 Any jurisdiction may apply for the Mitigation Fee which must be for a specific project to correct a documented impact ar~s~ng from a Facility. However, no Mitigation Fee shall be granted for a mitigation measure which is required for compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") or any other regulatory process. Moreover, any jurisdiction which is receiving a Facility Fee for a particular Facility would not be eligible to apply for a Mitigation Fee for that same Facility. The application process and the apportionment formula shall be determined by the Commission. O. Term. The term of this Agreement is for twenty (20) years from the Effective Date, unless extended or terminated as provided below. 1. Automatic Renewal Provision. The term shall be automatically renewed for a period of one year on the first day of the first January after the Effective Date, and for an additional period of one year thereafter on the first day of each January thereafter unless written notice of nonrenewal is served by City on the County at least 90 days prior to said date or written notice of nonrenewal is served by the County on City at least 60 days prior to said date. Under no circumstances shall a notice of renewal to either party be required to effectuate the automatic renewal of this Agreement. If either party serves notice of intent in any year not to renew this Agreement, this Agreement shall remain in effect for twenty years after the next automatic renewal date. 2. Early Termination. The County may not terminate this Agreement within the initial 20-year term. City may request and be granted early termination according to the ,provisions of this subsection. a. Conditions Precedent to Filing. If City desires to terminate this Agreement before the expiration of the remaining term, it may do so according to the following procedures. b. City's Obligation to Meet and Confer. Prior to filing a petition for early termination, City shall meet and confer diligently and in good faith with the County and the Commission to discuss the reasons for the proposed termination, including, but not limited to the following issues: 18 ~~30 (1) The alternate means of Solid Waste disposal which is reasonably available to City over the remaining Term. (2) Giving the Commission the opportunity to employ said alternate form in the System. (3) The impacts on the System of the withdrawal of city from the System. (4) The terms and conditions, and the date for, early termination. In this regard, City shall be given every available opportunity to mitigate the impacts of its withdrawal from the System. c. Commission's Duty to Meet and Confer. The Commission shall diligently and in good faith meet and confer with the petitioning Member City. d. City Adopts Resolution. After the meet and confer process has concluded, City shall have the right to petition for an early termination of this Agreement after a noticed public hearing, including notice to the Commission, and the City Council adopts a resolution to petition the Commission for early' termination. e. City Files Petition. The petition shall include the following provisions: (1) A copy of the resolution. (2) A detailed statement of the reasons for the proposed termination of the Agreement. , (3) A detailed description of the means which City will use to dispose of its Solid Waste after termination is granted and an indication of 'whether such means are available to other Member Agencies. (4) Such other information as the rules of the Commission may require. f. Duty to Formulate Terms and Conditions for Early Termination. The Commission, following a public hearing, shall formulate the tentative terms and conditions for early termination of this Agreement with City. The Commission shall meet and confer in good faith with City regarding the Tentative Conditions. 19 ~'.3( g. Terms and Conditions for Tentative and Final withdrawal. The Commission shall set such terms and conditions as are reasonably necessary to mitigate any impact on the System of the withdrawal of City sooner than the expiration of the remaining term, including but not limited to the following factors: (1) The present value of closure and post closure costs for System Facilities in excess of the amount for which reserves have previously been set aside. (2) The impact on any existing System Agreement, that will be caused by the loss of tip fees contributed from the disposal of City's Acceptable Waste. (3) The date at which termination should be granted to reasonably avoid impairment of any System Obligation. The Commission shall not set a date for early withdrawal sooner than 5 years from the date withdrawal is finally approved. (4) The present value of City's contribution toward System Facilities, reserve funds, closure and post closure costs, and remaining landfill capacity, any or all of which will inure to the benefit of the System following withdrawal. (5) No withdrawal shall be permitted by the Commission except on terms and conditions which are certified by an independent consultant approved by the holders of the System Obligations or their respective fiduciaries, taking into account all uncertainties and contingencies as to future System revenues and expenses, to have no material and adverse financial impact on the holders of the System Obligations or on Member Agencies. Any withdrawal which would have the effect of lowering any then current credit rating on System Obligations shall be deemed to be material and adverse. , h. Method of Conditions. Compliance with Termination City, with the Commission's approval, may utilize any combination of methods for mitigating the System impacts, including but not limited to the following: (1) Cash payment; or (2) Continuing disposal of a portion of City's Acceptable Waste at a non-signatory tip fee. Such methods for payment shall be sufficient to avoid impact on the System's financial condition. 20 [,'32. i. Duty to Offer Termination to All Member cities. After approval of the Tentative Conditions by the Commission, the Commission shall solicit all Member cities to see if they have an interest in early termination on the same terms and conditions as in the Tentative Conditions. Other Member Cities shall have 60 days to request early termination based on the Tentative Conditions. If any other Member Cities request early termination, the Commission shall recalculate the impact on the System of City's withdrawal taken in conjunction with all other Member Cities desiring early termination, and shall thereafter formulate, in negotiation with all such cities, a set of final terms and conditions for early termination which shall receive the approval of the Commission. After compliance with the foregoing procedures, the Commission shall grant all withdrawing Member Cities an early termination on the Final Conditions, and no withdrawing Member City may terminate except upon acceptance of said Final Conditions. j. Right of Withdrawing Member Participate in the Commission. City to After requesting early termination, but before grant of same, a withdrawing Member City'may participate in the decisions of the Commission except as to decisions relating to the Tentative and Final Conditions for its withdrawal. After early termination is granted, but before it becomes effective according to its terms, the withdrawing Member City shall be an ex-officio non-voting member of the Commission. After the Agreement is terminated, the Member City shall no longer be a member of the Commission. k. Revocation of Early Termination Request. , A Member City requesting early termination shall be entitled to revoke their request for early termination upon payment of all costs incurred by the System in processing their request, unless same are waived by the 'Commission. P. Liability. 1. Operating Facilities and Future Facilities. a. County Defense, Indemnity and Hold Harmless. The County, through its Solid Waste Enterprise Fund, shall defend, indemnify and hold harmless City, its elected and appointed officers and employees, from and against all claims for damages, liability, costs and expense (including, attorneys' fees) resulting from or arising out of the activities of the Commission, 21 {,,33 the disposal at an Operating Facility or Future Facility of Acceptable Waste generated by City or within City limits when disposal is in accordance with the applicable rules and regulations at the Facility. This obligation shall consist solely of the burden and expense of defending against claims and the incurring of expenses (with counsel reasonably approved by the indemnified parties), even if such claims or other proceedings are groundless, false or fraudulent, and conducting all negotiations of any description, and paying and discharging, when and as the same become due, any and all judgments, penalties or other sums due against City. City at its sole expense, may employ additional counsel of its choice to associate with counsel representing the County. County I s obligation to indemnify shall be reduced to the extent of the negligence or fault of City in connection with the causation of the accident, occurrence or condition giving rise to the claim. There shall be no duty to defend or indemnify if the accident, occurrence or condition giving rise to the claim is solely a result of the negligence, fault or activities of city. b. Notice of Claim If City shall become aware of or receive notice or other communication concerning any actual, alleged, suspected or threatened action which would trigger an indemnification obligation on the part of the County pursuant to this section, including without limitation, notice or other communication concerning any actual or threatened litigation, investigation, claim, citation, directive order, writ or injunction, City shall deliver to the County, within 15 days of receipt of such notice or communication by City, a written description of the substance of the notice or communication, together with any documents evidencing the notice or communication. Except as provided herein, rec~ipt ox such written description shall not be deemed to create any obligation on the part of the County to respond. c. Contamination Claims. This Section shall not apply in cases of lawsuits or other actions taken under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, as amended by the Superfund Amendments and Reauthorization Act of 1986 ("CERCLA"), 42 V.S.C. ~ 9601 et~; the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act ("RCRA"), 42 V.S.C. ~ 9601 et ~; the Safe Drinking Water Toxic Enforcement Act of 1986, California Health and Safety Code ~ 25249.5 et ~; the Clean Water Act ("CWA"), 33 V.S.C. ~ 1251 et ~; the Safe Drinking Water Act, 42 V.S.C. ~ 300f et ~; the Clean Air Act ("CAA"), 42 V.S.C. ~ 7401 et ~; the California Air Pollution Control Law, California Health and Safety Code ~ 39000 et ~; the 22 ~~.3C/ California Integrated Solid Waste Management Act ("ISWMA"), California Public Resources Code S 44000 fi~: and plans, rules, regulations or ordinances adopted, or other criteria and guidelines promulgated pursuant to the preceding laws or other pollution control laws, regulations, rule or ordinance now or hereafter in effect. d. First Response. Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection c, the County shall cause the Solid Waste Enterprise Fund to pay for any costs, judgments, monetary damages, orders, decrees, or otherwise legally imposed obligations of any Member cities resulting from or arising out of the disposal at a Facility of waste generated by City or within City limits including, but not limited to, cases of lawsuits or other actions taken under CERCLA or RCRA, or similar State Laws during the time that it is a Member City. city agrees that the County may enforce its rights and defenses pursuant to subsection c through an action in indemnity or contribution. 2. Non-Operating Facilities. Nothing in this Agreement is intended to alter the existing liabilities of any jurisdiction with respect to Non- Operating Facilities, including the County's or a city's right of contribution for CERCLA liability or damages against the County or any other city or party. . Q. Newly Incorporated Cities. 1. Ninety Days to Approve Agreement. A City incorporated after the Effective Date of this Agreement may, within 90 days of the effective date of incorporation, elect to sign a Participation Agreement without payment of a buy-in charge. During this 90-day period the City shall not be assessed an Economic Risk Surcharge. A City which has not signed a Participation Agreement within 90 days of the effective date of incorporation shall be treated as a Non- Signatory City. 2. Terms and Conditions of Incorporation. The provisions of subparagraph 1 above shall not be deemed to supersede any condition of incorporation determining that the City succeeds to the obligations of the County imposed by the Flow Control Covenant within the city's jurisdiction. In the event such a condition is imposed, the City shall be deemed to have signed this Agreement within the period specified above. 23 b-j~ VI. Miscellaneous. A. Rights of Holders of System Obligations. The City acknowledges that the holders of System Obligations are third party beneficiaries to the covenants and agreements of the Member Agencies herein: that such covenants and agreements constitute a material element of the inducement of such holders to the purchase of such System Obligations: that such holders and their fiduciary shall be entitled independently to seek and obtain jUdicial enforcement of any breach hereof by either party hereto the effect of which causes or may cause a breach by the County of any System Obligation: and that no amendment may be made hereto which materially and adversely affects the rights of the holders of System Obligations. B. Notices. All notices, demands or requests pursuant to this Agreement shall be in writing. All notices, demands and requests to be sent to any party shall be deemed to have been properly given or served on the date actually received, if personally served or deposited in the United States mail, addressed to such party, postage prepaid, registered or certified, with return receipt requested, at the addresses identified below. Notices or documents sent to the County should be sent to: County of San Diego Department of Public Works Solid Waste Division (0383) 5555 Overland Avenue San Diego, CA 92123 Attn: Deputy Director with a copy to: Office of County Counsel 1600 Pacific Highway, Room 355 San Diego, CA 92101-2469 Attention: County Counsel Notices to the City should be sent to: , , CA Attn: City Manager With a copy to: , CA Attention: City Attorney 24 '" ~ 3h C. Entitlement to Subsequent Notices. No notice to, or demand on, the parties for notice of an event not herein legally required to be given shall in itself create the right in the parties to any other notice or demand in the same, similar or other circumstance. D. Entire Agreement. This Agreement, together with any other written document referred to or contemplated herein, embodies the entire Agreement and understanding between the parties relating to the subject matter hereto and may be modified only by written agreement signed by all of the parties. E. Authority of Parties. Each signatory warrants that it has legal authority to enter into this Agreement. F. option to Include More Beneficial provisions in other Agreements. If, after City has signed this Agreement, another Member City negotiates clauses or agreements different from other existing agreements or more advantageous to itself, County shalli within fifteen days after such clauses or agreements are executed, tender an option to such cities to amend this Agreement to include these same clauses or agreements to the extent applicable. G. Modification. Amendments, modifications, and waivers to this Agreement shall be mutually agreed to in writing by the Parties and approved by their respective legislative bodies. , H. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in more than one counterpart, each of which shall be deemed to be an original but all of which, when taken together shall constitute but one instrument. I. Non-Severability. In the event that a substantive prov~s~on of this Agreement shall be determined to be invalid, illegal, or unenforceable in any respect, the parties hereto shall negotiate in good faith such amendments, modifications, or supplements to this Agreement or such other appropriate action as shall, to the maximum extent practicable in light of such determination, implement and give effect to the intentions of the parties as reflected herein. If negotiations in good faith fail, the County will have the right to terminate the Agreement. 25 G.-31 J. Headings. The captions and headings in this Agreement are for convenience only and shall not define or limit the provisions hereof. K. Waiver. No breach of any prov~s~on herein can be waived unless in writing. Waiver or anyone breach of any provision herein shall not be deemed to be a waiver or any other breach of the same or other provision hereof. L. Remedies. All Parties hereto shall have the right to commence any action at law or equity, including specific performance, to remedy a breach of the terms herein, provided that neither Party shall have the right to terminate this Agreement except as provided herein. M. Other Agreements. This Agreement shall not be deemed to amend or alter the terms of other agreements, whether existing or approved in the future, between City and County, except as provided herein. N. Exclusion of the City of San Diego. The terms and conditions of this Agreement exclude the City of San Diego unless otherwise expressly provided. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the City and County have signed this Agreement as of the date first set forth above. CITY OF , MAYOR ATTEST: CITY CLERK COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO By: Title: 26 b-.:H EXHIBIT II SAN DIEGO ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS (SANDAG) Member Aqency County of San Diego Chula vista Oceanside Escondido El Cajon vista Carlsbad National City Encinitas La Mesa Santee poway San Marcos Imperial Beach Coronado Lemon Grove Solana Beach Del Mar July 1, 1992 Population Poplation 419,988 141,778 138,469 112,851 90,241 75,780 65,661 58,632 56,530 54,043 53,853 45,389 42,778 27,138 26,683 24,660 13,189 4.983 1,452,646 (,,~3~ EXHIBIT 1 Operating Facilities Active Landfills San Marcos Otay/Otay Annex Sycamore Borrego Springs Ramona Rural Container (Bin Transfer) Stations Barrett Junction Boulevard Campo Julian Ocotillo Wells Palomar Mountain Ranchita Sunshine Summit Vallecito Viejas Landfill Gas Recovery Facilities (Inactive Landfills) Bell Junior High Bonsall (under construction) , Palomar Airport Landfill (design phase) Other Facilities North County Recycling and Waste Reduction Facility (under construction) Palomar Airport Transfer Station (land and partial improvements) 15 acres of industrial land in the City of Vista (land only - possible future transfer station) ~"'<fo EXHXBXT XXX APPORTXONMENT FORMULA (1) Determine each Member Agency's population (as reported by SANDAG on July 1 of each year). If any Member Agency has 40 percent or more of the total population of the Member Agencies, allocate 40 votes to that Member Agency and follow step 2; if not, follow step 3. (2) Total the population of determined in step 1 and compute each Member Agency has. the remaining Member Agencies the percentage of this total that (a) Multiply each percentage derived above by 60 to determine fractional shares. (b) Boost fractions that are less than one to one; add the whole numbers. (c) If the answer to step b. is 60, drop all fractions and the whole numbers are the votes for each Member Agency. (d) If the answer to step b is less than 60, the remaining vote(s) is allocated one each to that Member Agency having the highest fraction(s) excepting those whose vote was increased to one (1) in step b. above. (e) If the answer to step b. is more than 60, the excess vote(s) is taken one each from the Member Agency with the lowest fraction(s). In no case may a vote be reduced to less than one. (3) Total the population determined in step 1 and compute the percentage of this total that each Member Agency has. -;,. " (a) Boost fractions that are less than one to one; add the whole numbers. (b) If the answer to step a. is 100, drop all fractions and the whole numbers are the votes for each Member Agency. (c) If the answer to step a is less than 100, the rema1n1ng vote (s) is allocated one each to that Member Agency having the highest fraction(s) excepting those whose vote was increased to one (1) in step a. above. (d) If the answer to step a. is more than 100, the excess vote(s) is taken one each from that Member Agency with the lowest fraction(s). In no case may a vote be reduced to less than one. 1.,-1.11 AD HENSHAW AFFIDlS ALMAC SANITATION ALTO WASTE ANALYTICAL PIIOTO ANY AUTO APPROPRIATE TECH ARCIIITECTURAL IND. MODEL BENITO SINCLAIR BROWN AND CALDWELL BROWN YENCE& ASSOC BRYAN A STIRRAT & ASSOC BULL FENCE BULL FENCE BUTLER ROACH GROUP CWo CHRISTENSEN CA GEOLOGICAL GROUP CAL RECOVERY CAL TRANS CAMP DRESSER & MCKEE CAMP DRESSER & MCKEE CARDINAL WRECKING CARLSBAD CARLSBAD AIRPORT CENTRE CH2M HILL CH2M HILL CH2M HILL CHULA VISTA CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY OF CARLSBAD CITY OF CHULA VISTA CITY OF DEL MAR CITY OF ESCONDlDO CITYOFPOWAY CITY OF SAN DIEGO CITY OF SAN DIEGO CITY OF SAN DIEGO CITY OF SAN DIEGO CITY OF SANTEE CITY OF SOLANO BEACH CITY OF VISTA CITY OF VISTA COAST WASTE MGMT COASTWASTEMGMT COLGAN, FRED & DORIS CORONADO CRUSH MASTER DAMES & MOORE DAVID HUNTLY, PHD DELMAR DELANEY & AS5OC.'S DELOITE & TOUCHE DUKE UNIVERSITY E.P.A. DAVIDFEGE EAST COUNTY DISPOSAL EASTLAKE V.C. EBARRA INC. EXI11BIT IV FALLBRooKSANlTARY DISTRICT FIBRE RESOURCES INC GAINER & ASSOC GEOTECH CONSULTANTS H & W FARMING HARGIS & ASSOC INC HARMON WARD HDR ENGINEERING HENRY ENTERPRISES HERZOG CONTRAcnNG CORP. HILLSBOROUGH MASTER HOMEOWNERS Assoc. HOUSTON SCALE HUBBARD I LOVE A CLEAN SAN DIEGO I LOVE A CLEAN SAN DIEGO IMPERIAL BEACH IT CORP. IT CORP. IT CORP. JEMCO EQUlPIRAMONA DISPOSAL KISSINGER TRUCKING KLElNFELDER KLENFLEDER LA MESA LA MESA/SPRlNG VALLEY SCHOOLS LAIDLAW LAIDLAW WASTE MGMT LEBOEUF & LAMB & L & MAC LEBOEUF & LANB & L& MAC LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES LEMON GROVE LINSCOTT/LAW/GREENSPAN LSW ENGINEERS LUKE-DUDEK MALCOLM P/RNIE (lANDFILL) MARATHON CONSTRUcnON MASHBURN MASHBURN (Solid Waste Systems) MCLNERAY METCALF & EDDY INC METRO TRAFFIC MICHAEL BRANDMAN MKM COMMUNICATIONS NATIONAL CITY NATIONAL CITY NBS LOWRY NCRRA ET AL NORTH COUNTY CHAFLAINCY OCEANSIDE OCEANSIDE DISPOSAL OGDEN ENVIRONMENTAL PACIFIC ENERGY PACIFIC SOUTHWEST PACIFIC SW BIOLOGICAL PACIFIC WEST COMMUNICATIONS ~-i.f). PENNY LEW DEL CARMEN PHILLIP UNITT PHILLIPS REYNOLDS INC. (Robert 8eln & ASSO PLASTICS RECYCLING PLASTICS REPROCESSING POD/SASAKI POWAY PUBLIC FINANCIAL MGMT PUBLIC FINANCIAL MGMT INC QEI, INC. RoW. BECK RoW. BECK RAMONA RAMONA DISPOSAL RAMONA MUNICIPAL WATER RAMONA UNITED SCHOOL D1ST. RECON RECON RECON RECON RECON CONSULTANT RECYCLING EARTH PRODUCT ROY E. LAnD INC. SAlC SAN DIEGO CITY TREASURER SAN DIEGO ECOLOGY CENTRE SAN DIEGO RECYCLING SAN DIEGO RECYCLING SAN DIEGO RECYCLING SAN DIEGO STATE lJNIYERSITY FOUNDATION SAN EUJO RANCH SAN MARCOS SANTEE SANTEE SCHOOL DISTRICT SCS ENGINEERS SOLANA BEACH SOLANA BEACH SOLANA RECYCLERS SOLANA RECYCLERS SOLANA RECYCLERS SOLANA RECYCLERS INC SOLAR TURBINES INC SOUTH STATE TOWING SOUTH WESTERN COLLEGE STA INC. TECH PLAN U.s. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY U.s. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY URBAN CORPS VISTA VISTA IRRIGATION DISTRICT W.Ro CONNELLY WASTE MANAGEMENT WASTE MANAGEMENT WAYNERIFER ZINSER. FURBY, INC. !~~ ","~"<:'ri.~,:~'"~',,..... . ... .' .." __. ..,".,,:,;~j,"~" ~'~;:;'6;;Y~;:H~~~...,;';''-,';;;;;';';..",,,,,,;-';,,;,~ ,,,:;;..;;;- REVISED 3-18-93 SOLID WASTE - KEY DATES ATTACHMENT B February 16, 1993 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS APPROVED THE PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT IN CONCEPT AND FORWARDED THE AGREEMENT TO THE CITIES FOR WORKSHOPS February 26, 1993 SANDAG WORKSHOP ON THE AGREEMENT March 26, 1993 SANDAG - TRASH SUMl\flT 8:30 A.M. * March 30, 1993 (APRIL 20) BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA - PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT STAFF REPORT WILL REVIEW ANY NECESSARY CHANGES THAT RESULT FROM THE DELmERATIONS WTI1I THE CITIES AND WILL REQUEST THE BOARD TO APPROVE THE AGREEMENT AND FORWARD THE AGREEMENT TO THE CITIES FOR THEIR APPROVAL April 23, 1993 SANDAG MEETING - DISCUSS SYSTEM FINANCING AND TIP FEE May 4, 1993 BOARD OF SUPERVISORS AGENDA ITEMS 1. ERNST & YOUNG REPORT ON THE CIP AND SHORT AND LONG TERM FINANCING 2. THE TIP FEE RECOMMENDATION * May 15, 1993 EFFECTIVE DATE OF PARTICIPATION (JUNE 15 OR JULY 1) AGREEMENT WTI1I THE THRESHOLD LEVEL OF PARTICIPATION July 1, 1993 ECONOMIC RISK SURCHARGE GOES INTO EFFECT FOR NON-SIGNATORY JURISDICTIONS EFFECTIVE DATE OF NEW TIP FEE * June 1, 1993 (JULY 1) * PROPOSED DATE CHANGE IN PARENTHESIS ~___q..3I~-#'f J) " y '\ V /' .. ... ATTACHMENT C [Draft] Ml!i:MORANDIlM TO: FROM: City Manager City Attorney Febl'lW'y 23, 1993 Proposed "AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF AND THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO CONCERNlNGDELlVERY OF SOLID WASTE TO COUNTY FACILlTIFS AND THE ESTAlU..ISHMENT OF '!'BE SAN DIEGO COUNTY SOLID WASTE COMMISSION ('Partt"'paUon ~.."nt') [Solid Wllte PartfcipatfoD AlP-III"nt] DATE: RE: At its spring seminar held on February 19 the San Dieao County City Attorney's Association discussed, at great length, the above rcfcrenccd agreement. It was the consensus of the City Attorneys in attendance (all cities except San Marcos and Vista) that, despite the efforts of the Chula Vista City Anomey and City Manager representatives who have been working closely with the County Staff to obtain an acceptable draft agreement, the cment proposal may beillusory in that it fails to sufficiently commit the County to specific pclIfozllu.n..., requirements or contains conditions precedent or subsequent which allow the County to escape its obligations. The City Attorneys identified the following items on which you and the City Council may wish to provide policy direction before the agreement is presented to the City Council for final consideration. These items, not listed in any particular order of priority. are as follows: A. Any agreement relAting to !ofui waste disposal should include all of the following: 1. A clear service covenant (duty to serve) with reasonable auarantee.t of perfOrnlllnce by the service provider. 2. Secure rate protection and, because multiple jw:isdictions are involVed, rate equa1ity. 3. Appropriate apportionment of liability risb, inclUding but not 1imited to CERCLA liability rim. 4. A clear obligation to locate and develop disposal sites (preferably local) at the lowest possible . cost and with the gDlatOst protection to the environment, coupled with a clear, ~igl'lificant remedy for failure by the County to perfuuu. - ~~tI~ '\) . 'y .. . '. MEMORANDUM February 23, 1993 Pale TWQ B. Decision-makini authority on all critical aspectS of the entire system should be equitably apportioned among all participating members. C. The enterprise operation and capital improvement contracts should be subject to a system which assures public cost accountability: including, for example. open, fair and competitive b;riri;'lg for service and improvement contracts. If you and the City Council find that the current p1'Dp08al. adequately addresses the isaucs identified in items A, B, and C, above, then the current structure Il1ay be implp-mented with certain modifications to the existing contract. These modiftcations arc too dmlJed to addma in this memorandum. If long term financing is contemplated by the County, then a requirement that the County commence a validation action should be COJIsiden:d. The following questions must also be resolved to the satisfaction of the City Council: D. Does the cummly proposed County commission structure for implementation of the "Participation Agr-n-ent" best. serve the interests of the City? Has full consideration been given to other choices for provision of solid waste hAnriHlIg? Por example,have the following been given consideration: formation of a joint powers agency without the County; formation of a joint POWers agency to enter into an agreement with the County; establishment of a special act district? E. Have the cities received adequate technical assistance concerning the current proposal and available options? Should the cities retain independent technical assistance to aid the citic3 in reviewing the various issues involved with the current proposal and the available options? ### (,.lfl.:, ./ ... SOLID WASTE PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT REVIEW ISSUE POINTS * COMMISSION AUTHORITY: What are the specific roles of the Commission and the County. What authority lies in the Cities role? Is decision making authority equitable among participants? * COMMISSION STRUCTURE: What other options were considered, such as; Joint Powers Authority, Special Act District, etc.? * TRUST ISSUE: Can the level of trust be restored/created between the County and the Cities? * TIMING ISSUES: Why the 20 year term? What is the timing constraint with the Bond Issue? * CITY/COUNTY CHANGING RESPONSmILITIES: What are the new city responsibilities under AB 939? What have been the County responsibilities, will they continue as in the past? * ALTERNATIVES: What are the alternatives available to the Cities, are they also available to the County/Commission? (.. ~ 7 . * COMMISSION ACTION ON EXISTING COUNTY CONTRACTS: Can the NCRRA project be eliminated because of cost efficiencies? * RATE PROTECTION: What roles will cities play in setting/recommending rates? Is the role secure? Is there opportunity for equity in rate issues? * LIABILITY ISSUES: What is the City's ongoing responsibility for environmental liability (CERCLA)? What liability might a city face if it pursues other alternatives? * FACILITY SITING ISSUES: Are there sufficient guarantees of action to provide facilities? What role does the city play now in landfill siting? Will this role change through the agreement process? * WHAT IF AN INSUFFICIENT NUMBER OF CITIES AGREE? What will be the County's response; and its future role? lP"'4-~ . M E M. 0 RAN DUM March 30, 1993 TO . . The Honorable Mayor and City Council John D. Goss, City Manager I ~ Stephanie Snyder, Principal Management Assistant~ VIA FROM SUBJECT Follow-up Recommendations to the Solid Waste Participation Agreement Proposed At the Solid Waste Summit held March 26, 1993, a task force of elected officials from a regional representation was established for the purpose of determining what changes to the draft Participation Agreement should be recommended in an effort to reach regional consensus. South Bay cities will be represented by the Cities of Chula Vista and Coronado. At the request of Councilmember Moore, this memo has been prepared to present the few major concerns City staff would like to see addressed in changes to the draft Agreement. In general, the most significant issues relate to the tone of the staff recommendations listed in the Council Agenda Statement. First, separate the immediate need to secure the San Marcos landfill expansion from the long-term question of complete flow commitment. Then, allow for the establishment of a different organizational structure (such as a JPA) to ensure a more equitable and concrete sharing of authority between the County and participatory cities. It is suggested that these goals can be accomplished by making appropriate revisions to the existing draft Agreement. Specific issues or recommended changes include: 1) A Phased Aooroach- Amendments to address: a) requiring only a partial commitment of the cities' waste stream under the current proposed authority (joint exercise of powers with the formation of a Solid Waste Commission) if a guarantee is truly necessary for the San Marcos expansion, and b) phasing the organizational structure into a JPA (or comparable entity to accomplish the desired goal stated above) within a specified period of time, which would provide the complete commitment of flow under a partnership and allow responsible and adequate long-term planning for the system. (p -lf~ v) . APPROPRIATE AGREEMENT REFERENCES Page 2 Sections V.A.l, .2, and .3- Establishment of the Solid Waste Commission (Page 6) Section V.K.l- Deliverv of Acceptable Waste to the Svstem (Page 11) 2) Assurance of Rate Eoualitv- Strengthen or add new language regarding continuation of a uniform tipping fee for all Member Agencies at any of the system's like facilities, to prevent any future potential to charge differential fees based on geographic location. APPROPRIATE AGREEMENT REFERENCES Section V.N.l- Tip Fee Charoe (Page 16) 3) Non-Severabilitv- Add language to ensure that if the parties negotiate amendments, modifications, or supplements in good faith and those negotiations fail, both the County and the City have the right to terminate the Agreement. APPROPRIATE AGREEMENT REFERENCES Section VI.I- Non-Severabilitv (Page 25) 4) Authoritv to Control Flow- This is a fundamental concept underpinning the Agreement. It should be noted and discussed that the Agreement contains lengthy sections regarding a city's authority and, therefore, subsequent duty to direct the waste generated within its jurisdictional boundaries to the County system. There are also provisions about challenges to that power. Despite these sections, the City Attorneys' Association has voiced serious concerns about a city's ability to direct flow. Recent case law and the dynamic nature of the waste management field may leave the legal question difficult to answer at this time. From the management perspective, the Agreement should be crafted in such a manner that clearly protects the City if it is determined at some future time that there is no authority to control the waste stream. However, the situation does not preclude entering into the Agreement at this time. APPROPRIATE AGREEMENT SECTIONS Sections V.K.2 and .3- Waste Flow Enforcement and Power to Exercise Flow Control (Page 12) Section VI.I- Non-Severabilitv (Page 25) 1,~Sb COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENTS ITEM -, MEETING DATE: 3/30/93 Report on Sewer Treatment Alternatives for Chula vista SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public Works ~ REVIEWED BY: ci ty Manager...J:\ \1~) ITEM TITLE: The attached report and appendixes (Separate binder) are for your review for the Council Conference on the Sewer issue. The purpose of the report is to bring the Council up to date on the sewer treatment issues facing Chula Vista in light of the Clean Water Program. There are several alternatives presented with a priority of alternatives best suited for Chula vista in order to meet our goals. It is not intended that the Council make a final decision on which alternative to select at this time because changing conditions with the San Diego Area Wastewater Management District (SDAWMD) and future outcome of the EPA lawsuit may change the staff recommendation. JPL:C:\COl'ER.CWP 032493 1~111"2- ~ ~ [J) 0 - - ;> t j 0 ;:J Eo-< ::t Z U ~ r.. ~ o -< >< ~ Eo-< ~ - Eo-< U ~ ~ ~ o Eo-< r.. -< ~ ~ - ~ ~ Eo-< ~ [J) ~ ~ ., ~= "'.., c .. 0 .2lz :;;: ., ~< "'.., c .. 0 .2lz :;;: ., .r: OJ'" E 0 .2lz :;;: ., :5= "'N = .. 0 .2lZ :;;: ., .r: =~ c .. 0 .2lZ :;;: ., .r: ".... = 0 ~Z .... :;;: !! ~ ~;; 1:5 = -:; ..c U ~. ~ s .~ '0 OIl " Z s .~ g, " Z < Z s .~ g, Z ~ .~ '0 OIl Z o Z ~ ~ " " " " ~ .8 '" .g ~ ~ " 0. := (3 " " >- :> .-::: .- u " ~ " 0. ~ B ~ " ~ ~ " ~ t ~ " ~ ~ " ~ " :0 ~ .D e 0. CI {j ::E N 0; ~ '0 '" o >- 1: c 'w ~ 0. ~ " ~ ~ " ~ ~ " ~ ~ " ~ ~ " ~ ~ " ~ " :0 ~ .D e 0. CI {j ::E N 0; ~ B 0. " C 'w ~ 0. ~ " " (j '" r-- N '" ~ ... .-< 00 '" '" ... 00 o N 00 ... .... "< .-< N .-< ... .-< .-< r-: 00 ... N o <Xi ~ .-< ... ~ '" ~ ::E ... " .=: ~ > ;: " ~ 1: 0. " Z ~ ~ 8 ~ " ~ ~ " ~ ~ o N " :; '0 Z ~ " ~ ~ " ~ V) N o N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ '0 " " ';< "U ~ ~ ~ ~ t t ~ ~ t ~ ~ g> 'N 'ii " :> o ~ .8 >- ~ 0. 'l..3 ~ ~ o Z o Z ~ " ~ o Z ~ " ~ I.:::: " '" 1: o '" ~ " OIl ;; .D ,: .S: " " ~ "U ~ ~ .8 >- ~ 0. '" " ~ o Z '" ~ t '" " ~ o Z '" ~ .:::- -;;; '€ ~ 0. '" " ~ .:::- -;;; '€ ~ 0. CI < } >- " o ~ " ~ CI < ~ '" ;: >- " .D ;:: ,"0 " " ~ " OIl oS < >- " u OIl i': " :s 1: tl " '" ~ o >- 1: " 0- ~ 0. '0 " " z [/) Z o t - 0:: U [/) ~ Q ~ :> - Eo-< <: Z 0:: ~ ~ <: c .S - oj 8 oj U '" ~ "" c oj OJ) c 'N .~ '" ;:. o OJ) .S "" " u >< '" ~~ ~ ~ >. >. ~ ~ oj oj > > >. >. oj oj o 0 "0 "0 '-< '-< c E o 0 U U oj oj 't;) u; ;> ;> ~ ~ " " ..c: ..c: U U 66 <C <C [fJ [fJ c C '0 '0 ~ .~.~ [/) c '0 ...., 2:> .~ '-< '" 0.. c .S - '" 8 '" U '" ~ "" c '" OJ) c 'N .~ '" ;:. o OJ) c :a " u c - c c .S .S 0; - 8 '" '" 8 U ~ '" '" ~ ~ "" "" c c oj '" OJ) OJ) c c 'N ON .~ '00 '" '-< ;:. '" o b OJ) OJ) c c :a:a " " u u >< C '" - ~~ ~ ~ >. >. ~ ~ '" co > > >. >. '" '" o 0 2 B "E c 8 8 oj oj u; u; ;> ;> '" ..::! :; " ..c: ..c: U U 2:> .~ '-< '" 0.. ~ ~ [/) [/) ~.:-= [/) .~ .~ e C) U '0 '" e --. ~ c: 000 Z U U <C OJ <C OJ ~ N N ("'() ~ <o:::t o 0 0 c5 c5 c5 ZZZZZZ Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) IV .?: > .:: .::: .:: .:: ~ ~ -;; -;; ~ -;; c: c: c c:: c: c: 1-0 1-0 I-< l-or '-' l-< ~ ~ ~ .8 ~ ~ :;;: :;;: :;;: <C <C :;;: .- '" o () "" '" 0; 8 0; '" .5 >-. "0 .~ '" "0 5 0.. U ~ .S ~ U ~I - o c C ~ ~ 'u =' '" () 0.. C lJ 0 '" "" '" '" '" '" () '" >< .0 '" .~ '-< ..8 rl C 0 .S Z 0; '" V) .::: C 0; 1S.. C e ~ o - U <C C'? Ol 1 ..... '" ~ 1 o C'? <( I-T""" ~O >z :3w =>=:= :I:~ Oz u.a: Ow >-~ !:::<( o Ol l!'l V Ol V T'- Ol co co C'? N co N T'- l!'l T'- ~ co co v Ol co v N T'- 0 ~ r-: d r-: a:i <6 uj uj <6 r-: a:i ~ CO V> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CO I; V> V> V> V> V> V> V> V> V> ~ -l V> Iii> <( / I-- Iii 0 I-- i Cf) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 I-- Cf) 0 0 V> U ~ <( 06 I-- 0 Cf) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 > -l ::i <( 0 I-- V> ;:) Q.. I <( U U - - Ol l!'l V Ol V T'- Ol CO CO C'? N CO T'- l!J T'- ~ CO CO V Ol CO V N T'- -l CO T'- d r-: a:i <6 l!J l!J CO T'- CO ~ Cf) <( V> V> ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ CO I-- I-- V> V> V> V> V> V> V> V> V> ~ Cf) 0 V> 0 I-- U - N l!J T'- T'- N T'- C'? Ol T'- l!J l!J 0 G Ol CO ;:! Ol 0 <3 C'? T'- CO Ol ~ <( T'- Ol N CO CO CO T'- CO 0 Cf) ~ N '<i '<i v- 6 6 C'?- 6 v ~ ~ V> V> V> V> V> V> V> V> V> V> -- ~ ~- T'- N N CO 0 C'? CO Ol CO CO ~ ~ 0 C'? l!J T'- Ol N V CO CO 0 N -l 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ N N N N LL ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <eO 1--(9 8E - 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W(9 ~E ::i~ Uo W-l a:LL ~ - T'- N N CO 0 C'? CO Ol CO CO ~ ~ 0 C'? l!J T'- Ol N V CO CO 0 N (9 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ N N N N ~E ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ wS Cf)LL - l!J l!'l l!'l ~ C'? N ~ 0 0 0 0 0 -lCf) T'- T'- T'- Ol C'? T'- ~ l!J Ol C'? C'? <(. N CO l!'l T'- T'- CO CO Ol T'- l!J V V W 1--;:) ~ N C'? V l!'l CO T'- CO Ol Ol ;:) 00 -l I--W <( CPa: l!J 0 0 Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol 0 0 0 0 > T'- 0 0 T'- C'? C'? C'? C'? V V V C'? I-- ;:)<( N V Ol ~ 0 0 0 0 CO CO CO V Z Ow ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ Ol W W>- Cf) Cf) W C'? V l!J co T'- CO Ol 0 ~ N C'? a: Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol 0 0 0 0 -l Q.. a: Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol Ol 0 0 0 0 <( <( ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N N N I-- I-- W 0 W >- I-- Z (; ~ N Ol 1 .l!J ;:)~ 01 WO --~ '5 "&." C\J 012 10'" NN" ID N C -~o .0 v._ ",c"lil I--"'E ..... OJ", IDC- c.."C () .cIDID u~a: c.- 06 '" OJ OJ a:c >-w.s '" c.!::l -000 000..... _ID 06~i) .::<:.- >- OJ ID.oC ID .- .....N" UOl:J _OlU '" ~ C Cf) ..: a; - ID _ ID.o.o '::<:'0'" "'ul-- UlOID '" > W -Co+=- ID '" .....-c . 0 ('lj '- -o-uo> CD (J) _ ~ o ~ >-<( co" 00 :J . Q)w--..... 00 Cf) ID .-" C E ~2"':J ID '" Q.. 00 .cE C ..-.- C 0 OUlOU (/)Q)':.j:Ja.. OOC"'> ID E> co",u ~,,- ~ ID U C C 00 Q) 0 .Q '" a: " =.0 >-Q) "E- " Q) 00 ID - '" V> (J) "'.0 Ill> (J) .~ Q) >- +-' (I)(/)U~(/)o I---co Cf) ~.- U OU~-Eo U=o.....<( LL<(LLOCf) O~~ ~ ~N C'? Cf) Cf) <( [J) C'l Ol I ~ 1Il ~ I o C'l << t-C\1 en . >0 :5Z :,::)W J:~ C,)~ u..Z 00: >-W t-~ (3< ~ co @ "- '<t co ~ Ol "- "-I~ ~ ~ Ol Ol 00 C'l 0 C'l Ol l!)N "- ~ ~ l!) 00 N C'l ~ ~ ~ ~ N C'l '00 "- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 00 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ...1 ~ oe{ ..... I-- li< 0 I-- I (j) (2; N 0 @ Ol 0 "- I-- 00 C'l CO CO (j) 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ (!) 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 ~ oe{ 015 I-- 0 (j) CO CO CO CO CO CO CO > ...1 '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t '<t "- :5 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 00 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ =:J CL I oe{ 0 0 '<t CO 0 "- '<t CO C'l N ~ N l!) Ol N Ol N Ol 00 N "- Ol C'l "- ~ N ...1 ~ l!) 00 N M oi 00 00 oi oi ci C'l (j) oe{ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 I-- I-- ~ ~ ~ ~ (j) 0 ~ 0 I-- 0 00 C'l l!) "- C'l l!) CO N C'l CO '<t 0 - S l!) Ol C'l 00 i13 ~ "- CO l!) l!) oe{ l!) 0 N C'l N C'l '<t l!) (j) C) ~ ~ N C'l- C'l- N N N N N N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "- N N 00 0 ~ CO Ol 00 CO l!) l!) 0 C'l l!) "- Ol N CO 00 0 N '<t '<t ...1 ci ci ci ci ~ ~ ~ ~ N N N N u. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ...1_ oe{O I--C) 8E 06 CO l!) l!) ~ C'l CO Ol N ~ C1l "- "- 0 ~ C'l CO 00 0 N l!) "- 00 0 0 wC) 0 0 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N ~~ :5~ 00 W...1 eeu. is ~ "- "- "- "- "- "- "- "- "- "- "- C'l C'l C'l C'l C'l C'l C'l C'l C'l C'l C'l C'l C) 0 ci ci 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ wS (j)u. l!) l!) l!) ~ C'l N ~ 0 0 0 0 0 ...1(j) "- "- "- C1l C'l "- ~ l!) CJl C'l C'l oe{. N CO l!) "- "- 00 00 C1l "- l!) '<t '<t W I--=:J ~ N C'l '<t l!) CO "- 00 C1l C1l =:J 00 ...1 I--W oe{ '!>ee l!) 0 0 C1l C1l C1l C1l C1l 0 0 0 0 > "- 0 0 "- C'l C'l C'l C'l '<t '<t '<t C'l I-- =:Joe{ N '<t CJl ~ 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 '<t Z Ow - - - - - W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C1l w>- (j) (j) W C'l '<t l!) CO "- 00 C1l 0 ~ N C'l ee C1l C1l C1l C1l C1l C1l CJl 0 0 0 0 ...1 CL ee CJl C1l CJl CJl C1l C1l C1l 0 0 0 0 oe{ oe{ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N N N I-- I-- W 0 W >- 1- Z (,~ * l!) (!) 1il -g -C N E c: C1l'- 0 1 1Il ..Q l!) 0 lil . Q) Q) =:J~~ 01,# t' WOl!) 0 --~"- - -C -C Q) N OQ.Q) c: NOl-.c: 1Il lo{51-- -C NNc:> 5 Q)NO" ,u - -C.- 0 00 .Dc1ti'+= 0> ~lIlElii C1l .... C) co ca: . ~ Q)C:o;:CL::: Q.'C Q) ~ c .c:alee-gO:J g .~ 015 E Q) lil 1Il Ol Ol.-.c: Q) eec:c:lIl->- W.- 0 >- ~ iU' C:'!::! ~..Q Q) +JO~_ClC. . o !!!. Q) 0 .S '# lil 0I5~i!),#-cl!) ~ - 0ll!)C:-c ~ ~>-c:"-1IlQ) Q) al ..Q .- -C .c: 1il Q. '-C\J"gccn("(j ~ OC1l-co32o l!) -,=,C1l~;:OU) ~ lIl~_woU)Q) (j) U)'-Q)O;::"O~ 1ti Q)-~..Q1IlC:1Il '1Il ~Olll-1Il000 lIlul--~lIl-cC)U) iiiO Q) c: U)ON~ Q) co >Q) C1l U) W-O"';:; Q. C\J It,.. Q)1IlQ)U)C1l~1Il '- +-' c:: :?::.- or- 0- .0 ctS......;::::;"O c...... 0 -C - -C Q) Q) Q)'- 00 -C Q) ~C/) _.:t:.o 16 Cd (j) C\J C5=:J€oe{ Q) U) 0lC1lC1l cO::J(/)u==----O> Q) W +-' -L.. C ~ ~ c -- Ul (/)Q)~,- --c .- -C c: E Q) 0 c: -C .- ~2ctS:J~-o2co: Q)coCLU)-C-C-COOl .c:E c: Q)Q):J-- +-'.- C 0 Q) Q) en '- ~ o iiiQ) .Q 0 -E c: ~ Ul 0 U) 1ilCLc:Q)~C:O gj5E~o-E1il8o c: 1Il0-CooQ)~ :J-goc:31-0..QC: c:U)Q)OlllU)_=o o 1Il ee ..Q - co .- -C =..Q >- -C 5:~;: Q) "- Q) CD (f) 0 c.. +-' (/) E-g=:3UloCOlijco ~u)CO..QOoO-..Q CO> U)O CO coCL U) .f; ~ >..... Cd ~ en c 1;) (j)U)o.s:gC505Q)o to iii .~ 0 0 I-- ;;:: 1Il E 0 08;:'lij00$:Jgj~ o=O~oe{oe{lIl.c:~'-U u.oe{U.O(j)(j);:OI--O O;::--K1 C;)~ LO'CO'R (j) (j) oe{ ro (') 0> I lil :::!: I o (') <Cc:c ~C\J en . >0 :5Z :::>LU J:=== O~ u..Z 00: >LU ~~ o<C 0> l!) l!) 0 V 0 c;!P ~I~ ~~ f'- l!) f'- C\l 00 00 VOl <ri r-.: ci r-.: cO r-.: c.D'c.O f'-OO O)f'-~ ffi ffi ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ (0 I~ ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ~ ....J ffi Iffi <l: I l- I 0 I- CJ) (b C\l ~ 0 0) 0 f'- I- 00 0 C\l (') (0 (0 CJ) ci ci ~ ~ ~ ~ <ri 0 ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi 0 :::!: <l: o1l I- 0 CJ) (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 (0 > ....J '<I: '<I: V V V V f'- :5 ;:: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ cO ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi :J CL I <l: 0 0 0> l!) l!) 0 V 0 0 (') C\l C\l U) (') f'- l!) f'- C\l 00 f'-. C\l V 0) V 0) f'- ....J (0 f'-. ci r-.: cO Lri '<I' '<I' '<I' Lri Lri ~ CJ) <l: ffi ffi ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ l!) l- I- ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ~ CJ) 0 ffi 0 I- 0 l!) f'- f'- C\l f'-. (') 0) f'- l!) l!) C\l 0 0' 0) (0 V 0) 0 (3 (') f'- 00 0) <:) <l: f'- 0) f'-. C\l (0 (0 (0 f'-. 00 CJ) ~ ~ C\l v- v- -<i M M (')- (')- V ::;;;; ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi ffi --- ~ ~ f'- C\l C\l 00 0 (') (0 0) 00 (0 l!) l!) 0 (') l!) f'- 0) C\l V (0 00 0 C\l V V ....J ci ci 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ N N N N LL ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;io I-CJ 8~ 00 (0 l!) l!) ~ (') (0 0) C\l ~ 0) f'-. f'-. 0 ~ (') (0 00 0 C\l l!) f'- 00 0 0 WCJ ci ci ci ci ci ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N 2~ :5~ 00 W....J a:LL 0 ~ f'- f'-. f'- f'- f'- f'-. f'- f'- f'-. f'-. f'- (') (') (') (') (') (') (') (') (') (') (') (') CJ 0 0 ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ci ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ wS CJ)LL l!) l!) l!) :1; (') C\l ~ 0 0 0 0 0 ....Jen f'- f'- f'- 0) (') f'- ~ l!) 0) (') (') <l:- C\l (0 l!) f'- f'- 00 00 0) f'- l!) '<t V W I-:J ~ C\l (') V l!) (0 f'- 00 0) 0) :J 00 ....J I-W <l: "('j'i l!) 0 0 0) 0) 0> 0) 0) 0 0 0 0 > -a: f'- 0 0 f'- (') (') (') (') V '<t '<t (') I- :J<l: C\l V 0) ~ 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 V Z Ow - - - - - 0)- W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W>- CJ) - CJ) W (') '<t l!) (0 f'- 00 0) 0 ~ C\l (Y) a: 0) 0) 0) Q) 0) Q) 0) 0 0 0 0 ....J CL a: Q) Q) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0 0 0 0 <l: <l: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C\l C\l C\l C\l l- I- W 0 W >- I- Z 7..r" ~ ll) <ri 1ii -g "0 - E c C\l__ 0 0) III ..0 10 ..... _ll)Q) 3l :J~"'" Ol~ >- WOll) I __..-,...., 0 'OR"O Q) ~ C\l 0l$.I::. III IOIllI- "0 C\l C\l"O - C Q)C\lC:!: III ..0 "0 _Q ~ 00 ('{jctii.... 0) I-IIlEQ) 0) Ol .... ~ fficlllllln.:= o..-CU:!:~C .I::.ill~-go:J u C E ..... c--01l Q)1Il III Ol --.I::. Q) a:cOlIll->- wcu>-..... >- -NQ)..oQ) .l2c-Ui~Olo.. ...; o5l.....oc~ III o1l"i:~~:o:n ~ _>Ol!)C"O ..... 15 >-Olf'-. III Q) Q) Q) ..0 _~ "0 .I::. 1ii 0.. "'-N"OC:(/)('Ij rfl OQ)~IIl:!2u l!) ""O)U:!:Ol/) ~ ('IjT"""_EoUJa> Q) (J)_Q5~::"'C~ ca Q)..o..oIIlCIIl -Ill ':'::OIll-1Il00u 1Ilt51-~IIl"OCJl/) -OQ) l/) :::!:Q) ~ >COC\l l/) W""C:;::; Q) c..0)C\I "- Q)1IlQ)l/)Q).....1Il '--c~._T"""O- .0 ('IjL...r::;'Oc:,-O "0....."0 Q) Q) Q)--OO"O Q)Y'J _z=D(ij ('\jCJ)C\I 'O:J -ij'<l: Q) l/) 0l0) 0) CO:JC/)u=--r-Q) W +-" ~'- C CO CD C T""" Q) CJ) Q) Q) ..... ffi -- C l/)~ E.......... -- v C Q) 0 C "0 -- ~2('1j:J;::-02('1j Q)IIlCLl/)"O"O"OUOl .s _~ C 5 Q) ill gs 2 Cry o1iloo.sclIl1il~ l/) Q)-iijCL C Q)..o cg ~15E~o.stl8ci C IIlO"OOOQ)ffi :J-gocgs.....o..oc Cl/)Q)OIlll/)_=O o III a: ..0 - III -- "0 =..0>-"0 5-"":!:Q) --E "0 ~ gs tl DU g. C l/)1Il Q)-1Il III ffil/)IIl..oOUO-..o Ill> l/)o III IIlCL l/) CO>>. -:>_.....- .- "- .... ('Ij ;> (j) c: U) CJ) l/) u.l2:3'O 05 Q)O tn1il_~O()I-;;:: III EO 08:!:'iij00.Ei:;gj~ o=o.....<l:<l:IIl.I::......""-' LL<l:LLOCJ)CJ):!:OI-O O~N C;)~ LOCD';:::" CJ) en <l: I1l C'l Ol 1 .... (Ij ~ 1 o C'l ;::M en . -0 >z :5UJ ::>2:: J:!:;( Oz LJ..a: OUJ >-~ C:<: o CD ~ N CD ltl 83 C') "- ~ CDll; 0 CO CD V C'l ~ 0 "- CO N ltlOl N 0 ~ cO tri ~ ci <.ci tri tri <.ci <.ci<.ci (5 C\i ~ fF7 ~ N ~ fF7 fF7 fF7 fF7 fF71fF7 CO fF7 fF7 fF7 ~ fF7 fF7 ...J <( I- 0 I- -- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 (f) 0 0 0 I- (f) ci 0 fF7 0 ~ <( oi1 I- 0 (f) - > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 ...J ::i ~ ci fF7 ::l 0.. J: <( 0 0 CD ~ N CD ltl Ol f2 "- ~ CD C'l 0 CD V C'l ~ 0 N co N ltl Ol N ...J ~ co tri ~ ci CD ltl ltl <.ci CD <.ci (5 (f) <( ~ fF7 ~ N ~ fF7 fF7 fF7 fF7 fF7 fF7 l- I- fF7 fF7 fF7 ~ (f) 0 fF7 0 I- 0 - ~ ~ co N "- co "- N Ol CD ltl 0 B co Ol ~ co ltl 0 ~ ltl 0 CD N <( 0 ~ Ol N V ltl C'l v. V ltl (f) ~ C'l N C'l ltl N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -- fF7 fF7 fF7 fF7 fF7 fF7 fF7 fF7 fF7 fF7 fF7 ~ ~ "- N N co 0 C'l CD Ol co CD ~ ~ 0 C'l ltl "- 0) N V CD co 0 N ...J ci 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ C\i C\i C\i C\i lL ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <i!o 1-(') 2~ DO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 w(') 2~ ::i~ 00 W...J a:lL 0 "- N N CO @ C'l CD 0) CO CD ~ ~ C'l ltl "- 0) V CD CO 0 N (') 0 ci ci ci ~ ~ ~ ~ N N N N ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ wS (f)lL ltl ltl ltl ~ C'l N ~ 0 0 0 0 0 ...J(f) "- "- "- 0) C'l "- ~ ltl 0) C'l C'l <( - N CD ltl "- "- CO CO 0) "- ltl V V W I-::l ~ N C'l V ltl CD "- CO 0) 0) ::l 00 ...J I-W <( '!"la: ltl 0 0 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0 0 0 0 > "- 0 0 "- C'l C'l C'l C'l V V V C'l I- ::l<( N V 0) ~ 0 0 0 0 CO CO CO V Z Ow - - - 0) W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W>- (f) (f) W C'l V ltl CD "- CO 0) 0 ~ N C'l a: 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0 0 0 0 ...J 0.. a: 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0 0 0 0 <( <( ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N N N l- I- W 0 W >- I- Z 1-7 C\i Ol I ltl ::i~ 01 WO -- ~ -"0"0 o 0.. ID C\I C) 1ti 10"0 NNc: ID N 0 -"0.- .nero ~(ljE .... 01 (Ij IDC:- 0...- U .... ID ..c:3la: UC:oi1 c:.- (Ij 01 01 a:c:c: W.- >- N (Ij C:.- ..... 0 ~ O(J)ID oi1~e;ai . ~.o .;< >- v, (Ij ID .0 .!;; I- ~N"Oo.. OO):J> .....0>0> -~xO (Ij W (f)":IDE .ID-O Q) ..c..c '- ~OCO"+- ~1:)I-"- UiOID"O (Ij > c: W"O+::(Ij ID (Ij L.. ..... C - . 0 (Ij .... CD -0--0 Q) - Q) en _~ v 15 ~ ~<( 6 C:O:J(J) - Q) W ....... -L.. N (J) (f)ID(J) ._"0 c: E c: ~,*(ljV;E ~Eo..c:.2 ......- cOO oUioOO ~Q)~o...c .!!1C:E~o c:o(ljO"O :J"O- ID ID U c: (J) C:(J)~O(lj .Q (Ij "0 .0 =.0 >-ID (J) E1ilID~Ui fF7(J)(Ij.oo (Ij>(J)O .~ Q) >-..... (ij UJU}u~lf)o-o 1--c:0 (f) (J) .- 0 I- 08~'tj00 0=0....<(<( lL<(lLO(f)(f) O;:'(\j (Y) (f) (f) <( en -i ~ o N .!;; "5 o (J) c: :J .... - c: ID E ID ID .... 01 (Ij o a: I- W ~ c: ID ..c: ~ (J) ID E Tj (Ij - - c: ID E Cil ID .... - 1:) :J .... Ui c: o o o - "0 ID .... o:l 0.. ID .... 0.. ID .0 Ui :J E o:l - (J) 5 (Ij :J ..c: o ..< W I- o Z CO) Ol I .... ccr ~ I o CO) <C<c 1-'lI:t CJ) . >0 :sZ ::)UJ :r:~ o!;;: u..Z 00: >-UJ I-~ (3<C <.0 <.0 ~ I'- N Ol 00 00 0 v CO) v ~ 00 lJ) 0 N N N 00 N 0) lJ) N 0 00 cD cD 0) '<I' lri N ~ N N C'i '<I' Rl '<I' <f7 <f7 <f7 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0) <f7 <f7 <f7 <f7 <f7 <f7 <f7 <f7 ~ <f7 --! <f7 <( I- 0 I- CfJ $ N ~ 0 0) 0 I'- I- 00 0 N CO) <.0 <.0 CfJ 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ <.0 0 <f7 <f7 <f7 <f7 <f7 <f7 <f7 U ::?: <( 06 I- 0 CfJ <.0 <.0 <.0 <.0 <.0 <.0 <.0 > --! V V V V V v I'- ::5 <( ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 00 I- <f7 <f7 <f7 <f7 <f7 <f7 <f7 :J 0.. I <( U U <.0 <.0 0 I'- N 0) 0 ~ v 0) I'- ~ 00 lJ) N N ~ <.0 00 N <.0 ~ <.0 --! ~ <.0 0) '<I' lri ci oj oj ci ci ~ C'i CfJ <( <f7 <f7 ~ ~ ~ <f7 <f7 ~ ~ ~ ~ l- I- <f7 <f7 <f7 <f7 <f7 <f7 ~ CfJ 0 <f7 0 I- U e- '" 00 lJ) ~ ~ v 0 0) 0) N 0) 0 ~ ~ 0 0 <.0 N N <.0 0) 0) 0 0 <( 00 I'- '" lJ) I'- <.0 V V lJ) I'- 00 (') N- ",- ",- N N N- N CfJ E IW ~ N N <f7 <f7 <f7 <f7 <f7 <f7 <f7 <f7 <f7 <f7 ~ ~ e- I'- N N 00 0 '" <.0 0) 00 <.0 lJ) lJ) 0 '" lJ) I'- 0) N V <.0 00 0 N V V --! 0 ci ci ci ~ ~ ~ ~ N N N N LL ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <iCi 1-(') 2~ I _ e- <.0 lJ) lJ) ~ '" <.0 0) N ~ 0) I'- <.0 00 0 ~ '" <.0 00 0 N lJ) I'- 00 0 ~ w(') 0 ci ci ci ci ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N ::?:~ 0 C\i ::5~ uo w--! ~ f--- 5 ~ I'- I'- I'- I'- I'- I'- I'- I'- I'- I'- I'- '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" '" (') ci ci ci ci ci ci ci 0 0 0 0 0 ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ w9 CfJLL ~ lJ) lJ) lJ) ~ '" N ~ 0 0 0 0 0 --!CfJ I'- I'- I'- 0) '" I'- ~ lJ) 0) '" '" <(. N <.0 lJ) I'- I'- 00 00 0) I'- lJ) V V W I-:J ~ N ",- v- lJ)- <.0 1'-- 00 0) 0) :J 00 --! I-W <( ~ lJ) 0 0 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0 0 0 0 > - a: I'- 0 0 I'- '" '" '" '" v v v '" I- :J<( N v 0) ~ 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 v 2 Ow ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0) W ,w>- e- CfJ W '" v lJ) <.0 I'- 00 0) 0 ~ N '" CfJ a: 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0 0 0 0 --! 0.. a: 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0) 0 0 0 0 <( <( ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N N N l- I- W 0 W >- I I- 21 1~8> ~ lJ) cD 'lil "2 " N E C 0) 0 I 'ffi ~ lJ) ~ ccr :j"'" '- Q) o I#->' WO lJ) I ~y- f'. 0 ....."" N Oo.a> a> C N Ol'lil ~ ccr 10" " NNc :> C a>NO "" ccr :c-g'~ ~ ffi ~ccrE W 0) L.. 0> co: roo ,.... a> c- >0..= o.'C ~ "" ~ E ..c a>a> a: " ::J U a>u.... C .~ 06 E a> ccr ccrOlOl 'ffi;S~ a:Cc - ~ W -- () >. It.... >. N a>..c a> ~a'~ ~c>o. ~ Oena> o.~#- ccr 06~1) #-"lJ) ~ ~.~Ol lJ)C" .... ~~ I'-ccra> a> a> ..c .~ " ..c 'lil 0. ~N"O CW- 'if!. UO).2 ccr~~ lJ) _O)U >oen ccr~X o""ena> " CfJ .W a> '-0) ::t="'C~ 1a aiJi..c ccrcccr'ccr -"'occr _ccroOu ccrtJl- ~ccr,,(')ena> U;0a> cenN~ ti'J",E; a> 8.~N ~ a> <<1 Q)UJ...n_C\1 .oroE ~15~.Eo "....."a> a>a>'-OO" Q) U) _== uj..c(ij co:O'lN o ~ -E;'<( a> a> en 0l0) 0) cO::JenUu=--~O) a>W--.....~ c.l!1~c~ en (f)Q)Q)~L.. .-c .-" c ECfJ a> 0 c".- ~~co:~_~;02<<1 a>Eo..CU"a>"UOl ..c: co: Q) '::J -- ...._ c 0 "- Q) Q) U) L.. M 01i)oOc-EC(ljU)C; en a>'iijo.. 0 c a>..c Co 1115E~'2o;S.g;8ci c".!'1U.E"200a><f7 ::Ja>Uc en.....U..cc cena>oa>ccren_=O o ccr a: " ~..c E ccr'~" =..c>'a>ccr,^::J:!: a> -- Q) ..,Cwoo.......w E"2=gjuUiuccr~ccr <f7enccr..c::;OuU-..c ccr>enCfJuccrccro..en .S~>-_ oco:~t;)c1i) CfJenujg~"':-o5a>O I-U;COUOI-O:;:: EU (f) 0 .- T""" '- co: ...... Ou~1ijoen02::JSl~ U=O....<(::J<(ccr..c....vv LL <( LL 0 CfJ o.CfJ ~ U I- 0 O~C\J (t) ~ U1mt::' CfJ CfJ <( aJ (') C7l I ~ '" ~ I o (') <Cco ~"I::t (j') . >0 :sZ ::>~ :c- (,)~ u.Z 00: >-UJ ~~ o<c I'- ~ N ~ (') I"'- 0 CO <0 ~ 0 '<t <0 '<t C") 00 C7l I"'- C") C7l C") 0 00 <0 0 I'- ~ 00 ~ cO c:;j oi r-.: cO oi oi c:;j CO N fh ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N I"'- C") fh fh fh fh fh fh fh fh fh ~ ~ fh fh -l <( I- 0 l- ........ C/) ;g N ~ @ Q) 0 I'- I- 00 0 C") <0 <0 C/) c:;j c:;j ~ ~ ~ ~ <0 0 fh fh fh fh fh fh fh 0 ~ <( c6 I- 0 C/) <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 <0 > -l '<t '<t '<t '<t <:t: <:t: <:t: ::i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ fh fh fh fh fh fh fh :::> D- I <( 0 0 I'- ~ N ~ C") I'- N I'- ~ <0 '<t ~ '<t C") 00 Q) I'- N <0 00 '<t Q) CO Q) -l I'- 00 ~ 00 0 I'- ui CO <0 <0 r-.: ill C/) <( fh fh ~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ <0 l- I- fh fh fh fh fh fh fh fh fh ~ C/) 0 fh 0 I- 0 CO '<t N ~ 00 I'- C") CO '<t CO C") 0 6' I'- <0 N N <0 ~ 0 3 <0 00 ~ <( Q) ~ 0 I'- 0 0 ~ N '<t C/) ~ N- C") '<t CO '<t '<t '<t '<t .,f '<t ~ fh fh fh fh fh fh fh fh fh fh fh ~ S I'- N N 00 0 C") <0 Q) 00 <0 CO CO 0 (') CO I'- Q) N '<t <0 00 0 N '<t '<t -l ci ci ci ci ~ ~ ~ ~ N N N N LL ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ::eo 1-(9 ~E 00 <0 CO LO ~ C") <0 Q) N ~ Q) I'- <0 0 ~ C") <0 00 0 N CO I'- 00 0 '<t W(9 ci ci 0 0 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N I'- ~E 0 N ::is 00 W-l O:LL - Q1 ~ l"'- I'- I'- I'- I'- I'- I'- l"'- I'- I'- I'- C") (') (') C") C") C") C") C") C") C") C") C") ~~ ci ci ci 0 ci ci 0 0 0 0 ci ci ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~s wS c/)LL - CO CO CO ~ C") N ~ 0 0 0 0 0 -l(f) I'- I'- I'- Q) C") I'- ~ CO Q) C") C") <(- N <0 CO I'- I'- 00 00 Q) I'- CO '<t '<t W 1-:::> .~ N C") '<t CO <.0 I'- 00 Q) Q) :::> 00 -l I-W <( rjJo: CO 0 0 Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) 0 0 0 0 > I'- 0 0 I'- C") C") C") C") '<t '<t '<t C") I- :::><( N '<t Q) ~ 0 0 0 0 00 00 00 '<t 2 Ow - - - - - Q) W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ W>- (f) C/) W C") '<t CO <0 I'- 00 Q) 0 ~ N C") 0: Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) 0 0 0 0 -l D- o: Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) Q) 0 0 0 0 <( <( ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N N(NI-I- W OW >- 1-2 l~q tf.. L() ill 1U "0 "0 Q) C N E 0 Q) .ffi .0 I (3 ~ . CO ~ m :::>~ >- o I 'ift- I wo L() 0 '-,- I'- C\J oR"O Q) C N0l2 ~ '" 10'" "0 NN"O ,,; C Q)Nc 15 '" .0"0.2;;:: 00 cuc-ro "- 0) I-"'E 2 ~ ~Ol", ",. Q) c- ".D-=E O-"C 0 ;> > .cQ)Q) "0>5 oQ)O: Q)O~ ffi -8, c6 .~ ~ m o:cOl "'....>- ~ W .~N (3 >- ~ ~ Q).oQ) (\1C.- '=0l0- .....cC/)....- ...: o If) Qj 0 _~ 'ift- '" c65i) 'ift-"OLO ~ :> LOC'1J "- ~->-Ol I'-"'Q) Q) 3l .0 .~ "0 .c 1U 0- '-C\JU c(l)- cfl. OQ):J "':Q~ L() Q) -0 -'=' ".olf) "'~c 15lf)Q) "0 (f) ~a; ;:;=-0 ~ "* Q)-Ji.o "'c"'.'" ~o'" ...."'000 '" tp- ~ '" "0 (9 If)Q) ....OQ) Clf)N~ ~"O.~ Q)8.~N~ Q)'" Q)lf) ~'" .o1aE ~u~.Eo "0 ..... "0 Q) Q) Q) .- 00 "0 Q)~UJ _.:!:: c.ri.o--O)C\J o:::>~<( Q) Q) lJl ~Q)Q) cO-.:(J)()O==--,-O) ~ - .- C 1Il <.0 mWU5 ID ~ Q)_iI7.~T""" en Q)_"- C __"0 C E C/) Q) 0 C"O.- 2:Q)1Il:J lj::.....0Q)1Il a.>(Uo... (J}u:.c"Out5 en .cE Clll Q)Q):J-- ......_ c 0 "- OJ OJ (J) "- M O(j)oOc-f;ccotlE If)Q)'iijD-OcQ).oco ~cEsOo-5.l!J8ci -0 "'-u"-UJ 4;17 5"0 1Il00E Q)EooJi c Q) CQ)lf) 0 Clf)Q)o 1Illf)_= OlllO: ~.oclll.-"O =.0 >-"0 1Il :J:!:=:Q) .- Q) Q) ..c (J) 0 Q. +-' U) E1i3=KJo1ilolllffilll fhlf)lIl.Q:;OoO-.Q 1Il> C/)01ll",D-lf) .S ~ >- ~ 0 co ~ 1i) C tn C/)lf)o.l'l:g(l':....05Q)0 I-1ilCOOol-o;;:: EO Cf) 0'- T""" "- res +-" OO=:'@0lf)02:Jm~ 0=0~<(~<(1Il.c~"'" LL<(LLOC/) O-(f) =:01-0 O~N (1) -;;;r lO(O'R' (f) C/) <( lJ) GOALS 1. Adequate wastewater treatment and disposal capacity for present and future users: a. maintain capacity for existing areas of the City b. be able to provide capacity for future development when needed c. decision making capability by Chula Vista's Council 2. Lowest cost to ratepayers: a. existing ratepayers b. future development 3. Provide reclaimed water: a. for Chula Vista's residents b. for adjacent communities, if cost effective. ,- tt) Important negotiating positions by Chula Vista associated with Alternative 2A are: 1. Chula Vista shall be compensated for its excess capacity. 2. Chula Vista needs assurance that it will be provided capacity by SAD when needed. 3. Chula Vista should pay no more in unit fees than other agencies in SAD. 4. In renegotiating the METRO Agreement, San Diego should pay for the construction of facilities it was obligated to construct, and for fines San Diego incurred or will incur because of lack of compliance with State and Federal laws. 5. Areas tributary to Otay WRF do no join SAD, and Chula Vista takes responsibility for sewering those areas. 6. Chula Vista territories within SAD do not pay for over-sizing of facilities beyond 234 MGD, nor for reclamation facilities else- where in SAD. 7. Areas outside SAD will have the option to join SAD by paying pro rata costs at any time in the future. . 8. SAD will allow contract disposal of excess effluent and contract processing of solids generated at the Otay Valley WRF at a pro rata cost. . {..I/ Important negotiating positions by Chula Vista associated with Alternative 3 are: 1. Chula Vista will have the option to join SAD by paying pro rata costs at any time in the future, once it is clear what facilities will finally be required in the CWP. 2. Chula Vista shall not pay pro rata capital or rental costs as defined by existing Metro agreement for North City WRF since it will not use those facilities. 3. Chula Vista shall not pay pro rata capital or rental costs of over- sizing FIRP and SOP facilities beyond 234 MGD. 4. Chula Vista will have the right to build the otay Valley WRF if water reclamation there is not pursued by SAD. . . , . I; IJ... CITY COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT Item -g Meeting Date 03/30/93 ITEM TITLE: REPORT: Excursion Train Operation on the Coronado Branch SUBMITTED BY: Community Development Director City Manager~ \~ ~~ !~_ S. REVIEWED BY: (4/5ths Vote: Yes No X) BACKGROUND: The Western Group has proposed to operate a tourist excursion train on the Coronado Branch of the San Diego & Arizona Eastern Railway (SD&AE) from National City to Imperial Beach. The proposal would establish a tourist train operation from 24th Street in National City to the Silver Strand Boulevard in Imperial Beaclftcsee map). This report discusses the proposal and potential impacts (positive and negative) to the proposed Bayfront development. RECOMMENDATION: That the c:u~g~~~~'t~ort and direct staff to further investigate the status and environmental implication of the project. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: The Coronado Branch is a six-mile branch line of the SD&AE railway running from National City to Imperial Beach. The tracks are currently unused and have not carried freight traffic for over ten years. The branch line was constructed in 1887 to provide a direct rail link from National City to Coronado around the southern end of San Diego Bay. The ridership was initially composed of tourists and the steam engines hauled passenger cars to the Coronado Hotel and nearby Tent City. Trains were occasionally operated directly from Los Angeles to the Coronado Hotel. (The extension to Coronado was removed in the 1970s. The right-of-way still exists as a bicycle path.) Passenger operation ceased in 1896 and the line continued to carry freight until recently. The ownership of the line was part of John Spreckel's San Diego & Arizona Railway. It is now owned by MTDB and leased to SD&AE Railroad. The tracks are currently intact as far as the salt works and are generally in fair condition. Some repair work would be necessary on tracks crossing the Sweetwater River and salt flats. There are currently road crossings at F Street and J Street. Development of the Bayfront would require extension of E Street westward (over the tracks) and the construction of a new street to service the Merziotis parcel thus creating two more crossings. In addition, H Street may eventually be extended into the Bayfront. The proposal calls for the establishment of a short haul tourist operation at relatively low ticket cost ($10-15) for the six mile run. Based upon population and tourism in San Diego, the operator projects potential ridership at approximately 290,000 annually. The number 'of ~.., -- ~-~. ~ Page ~, Itemi Meeting Date: 4/01193 roundtrips the train would make would range from 3-7 trips daily depending on the season and demand. While the project would add an additional attraction to the area, the extent of the benefits to the City are not clear, as yet. The original proposal did not include any stops near the Bayfront where passengers could embark and disembark. One or several stops could accommodate and promote tourism and perhaps some limited commuting. The train could provide access to the Midbayfront project and Chula Vista Harbor. However, there are potential negative impacts which are discussed below: . Operation of the branch line may produce traffic circulation impacts. Railroad signalization of intersection with E Street, F Street, J Street, the access street to the Merziotis parcel and possibly H Street may be required. The impediment of traffic in conjunction with and proximity to the San Diego Trolley crossings, needs to be studied to determine the extent of impacts and potential safety issues. . The inclusion of stations on the Bayfront could further impact traffic circulation and parking. Any proposal to include facilities would have to be coordinated with plans to develop the Midbayfront. . Environmental concerns include noise impacts (from the steam engine) upon wildlife in the Sweetwater Marsh and D Street fill. . Repair and usage of tracks and vessels crossing the Marsh area need to be studied to determine whether there would be negative biological, geological or hydrological impacts to valuable environmental resources. Further information on these issues will be necessary before the extent of positive and negative impacts can be determined. These issues will be addressed in the required environmental assessment of the proposal. It is recommended that staff be directed to further study the project in coordination with the other partially impacted jurisdictions (National City, Imperial Beach and MTDB) and report back to Council as more information becomes available. FISCAL IMPACT: At this time revenues, if any, to the City are undetermined. Although gross ticket sales revenues could exceed $3,000,000, the point of sales would be, for the most part, National City and Imperial Beach. It is also unknown at this time whether tickets would be taxable. Ancillary financial benefits would depend upon whether or not there were stations in Chula Vista. In addition, City costs have not been identified, as yet. It is conceivable there could be costs to the City associated with infrastructure improvements, signalization, traffic control, parking, and mitigation. [C:IWP51ICQUNCILll13SITRAIN-1.113] 6, ')./8-4/ :,. ..' ..... . ,_.". i' .,,"~~:jl'. '"41""'r,,~;Plb"'!/!>~~~,.~'''', ~ ,I.<.:~ .'1"0.,,-....1.,. ... ,,-.~\ . ,.....,f,:'..,.,'t...."t\ ''''''~''''$.l' . .' l.P.--.........., ..\"...."'..s.........r. , ",.,' ........t:.~..,,'f..~.~u:\.. ~. ~: .~.~::~~~'~~.~~::~~: :..~,~ :~ ""\""'I,..I,~~.1;~~.;ri!'f,i ...'.....,.....>"'_~~.. '~.;;,iI'!i1::..... ;.... :-\",',.'>>~',",."\,!' ~~~. :....~r.". ~_-y. ,I... i ..\..,~ ., .'. ;..,i1"..:"J....~...~,* /'1~ ;\1". ~~.::;\'..L.~ ':'~ ' ',r\ ~.h.\..I...l...,~...;I1~. ~,.~,.~~\ 1 ,..,.......~:t. " i.''',"..(';'.-' 'Y.'.::'.. ...., ':J.\.~-:..~.\i-,.. ....~. "'lJ."'r~'" ;t.,!,;;l'~". ..,.' ~Il\:''''''~ .."',....,,~~I:t ~ ~~: ~~~~ r.'''':,:.:t.; '.:t ~ ., ''"''~~' .. r~.~ .f _ill'.... ,....." . ~..i...\i..; .' W t. :i ::;,,;~\,~," :.. of......,;. ..~. ?''''. "~~.ll';.""~, '."'t'1? ~;';"f'G "'. ",, to ~.... r6\.~. ti:I\""~' . ;-~;,:..:t7j~~~!$~'r i '~.:.f: ,~;'\'.:';'''''-:~;''. ~ 'If . . _ ~ ....:,. 1":~,',,,,~~. ""':~r'~;'\'~:~1 \., ~. Il' ...~fr"".!l:: ,.;~j1'''':: \~'''~''.' ....;l~..~:\-fl..~-'\~. ':f'\~,.\o: .~~-.=.l"""'- . ,"\' ....,.~\~~ "t'!:i; , ~l;;:'f" Ja\ I"""~~l'-""'f<' .~.:-;;: , ~':\.~.. :.;,.''''';. ~1;\'. '1::~ . .~ '.' ~\~::...:~\,~., . ~t,-\oj"';--;~:!'i'~~~',~ r"~'.l.~_,\""i';..':\.t-{~." ...".nm"~k"'.o;;'" .'. Wi"'. ..,....' "." ". ~'i1.~J.;; ... .....:"~...,lf..,.~..". <~::~......~ . ~,.~~",..,. [. .~~,. - .~ .~~.~.~.:.; .,.:;,,,,, , ....\ \\l~: ,.,\1"1\...... . L i:. L [."";:..: ,..... .". '.':-' . 1'\':. .-' ,. .' !\-:>~7 't: .: ',i",. . N~,;1tON~'- c,"'-i MA~NA (VtG-1'oe(~'$ lJv.Jl>'~) till}'; \6 U!.~O .fflttEY 5T . '1. U,TJ-l\ (Jl . 5T\-I \ \9\~ ~ k "( ;>- ~ ~'3 r ( . ~~ THE WESTERN GROUP P.O. Box 1544 . Ogden,Utah84402. (801)621-5311 or 621-5313 March 4, 1993 The Board of Directors MTDB 1255 Imperial Ave., Suite 1000 San Diego, CA. 92101 RE: Excursion Train Operations on the Coronado Branch Dear Sirs: We wish to make a formal proposal to establish excursion train operations on the Coronado Branch of the SD&AE Railway. We believe that this could be a very successful tourist attraction in the South Bay. Excursion trains are a growth industry at present, with over 300 currently operating in North America and many more in the planning stages. This compares to only 80 such operations twenty years ago. Nearly 80% are still in business (a higher longevity rate than the average business) and many are not in areas of high tourist activity. The Western Group owns and operates six shortline railroads in the u.s. and operates excursion trains on two of them. One operates through the spectacular Verde River canyon, near Sedona, Arizona, and is very popular with tourists in the area and with residents of Phoenix. The other operates out of Laramie, Wyoming and is also a very successful and popular operation. In addition, we are starting up a third train in the Pacific Northwest. The company has the capability, expertise and enthusiasm to run a similarly successful operation on the Coronado Branch (see attached company information booklet). In addition to the excursion trains of The Western Group others include: The Strasburg Railroad iq Pennsylvania with 500,000 riders per year, The Lahaina & Kaanapali on Maui with over 400,000 riders per year, the Durango & Silverton in Colorado with over 200,000 riders per year. The Coronado Branch has equal potential. It is located very close to the center of tourist population in San Diego that also has a large resident population and is visible from 1-5 for much of its length, which will further serve to attract riders. ~.s The excursion train can serve an additional function of providing a link between the various tourist related developments planned or existing along the Bay. Developments such as the National City Marina (Victoria's Landing), Gunpowder Point Nature Interpretive Center, the large Midbayfront project in Chula Vista, Chula Vista Marina and any possible developments in Imperial Beach. Mr. Charles Alban, The Western Group's local agent, has discussed the proposal with the mayors and other representatives of the cities of National City, Chula Vista and Imperial Beach. All have indicated enthusiastic support and believe there will be positive economic benefit to all three cities. In addition, Mr. AlbOn has discussed this project with The General Manager of SDIV, Mr. Dennis Kling who had no objections and would support our efforts. We hope you will give this proposal consideration and we will be happy to meet with you at your convenience to discuss it further. Sincerely yours, eu L~ - P.O. Scott Exec. V.P. and Chief Operating Officer cc: Jerry Rindone, Director MTDB Michael Dalla, Director MTDB Steven Haskins, Director MTDB <i$-lp ')