HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 1995/06/20
Tuesday, June 20, 1995
6:00 p.m.
"I declere ~ndor penalty of perjury that I am
employed by tile City 01 Ci1ulo Vista in the
Office 01 the City CI;ork 8nd the I I pos'.ed
this Agenda/Notice on the BUlletin Goard at
the Public ~rv'c.9s Building and at Ci~~n
DATED, 1->16 ,>5 SIGNED ~A ~ -"
(~.
REVISED
ReQ'ular Meetini! of the City of Chula Vista City Council
Council Chambers
Public Services Building
CALL TO ORDER
1.
ROLL CALL:
Councilmembers Alevy _, Moot _' Padilla _' Rindone _' and
Mayor Horton _'
2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG. SILENT PRAYER
3.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES:
June 6, 1995 (City Council Meeting), June 6, 1995 (Joint Meeting of
the City Council/Redevelopment Agency). June 7, 1995 (Adjourned
Regular Meeting of the City Council), and June 7, 1995 (Special
Worksession/Meeting of the City Council).
4. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY:
a. Oath of Office: Stephen R. Arends - Veterans Advisory Commission.
*****
Effective April 1, 1994, there have been new amendments to the Brown Act, The City Council must now
reconvene into open session to report any final actions taken in closed session and to adjourn the meeting,
Because of the cost involved, there will be no videotaping of the reconvened portion of the meeting. However,
final actions reported will be recorded in the minutes which will be avaiillble in the City Clerk's Office,
*****
CONSENT CALENDAR
(Items 5 through 14)
The staff recommendations regarding the following items listed under the Consent Calendar will be enacted by
the Council by one motion without discussion unless a Councilmember, a member of the public or City staff
requests that the item be pulled for discussion, If you wish to speak on one of these items, please fill out a
"Request to Speak Form" available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting, (Complete
the green form to speak in favor of the staff recommendation; complete the pink form to speak in opposition to
the staff recommendation,) Items pulled from the Consent Calendar will be discussed after Board and
Commission Recommendations and Action Items. Items pulled by the public will be the first items of business.
5. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS:
a. Letter from the City Attorney stating that as a result of deliherations that occurred in Closed
Session on 6/13/95, although not legally required to be reported, but with the consent of the
entire Redevelopment Agency, the City Attorney reports that the Agency expressed the
intention that they would proceed with the demolition of the Fuller Ford site after getting
verification from soils testing, if the cost of remediation in the Agency's judgment, is not
excessive. It is further the present intent of Council to demolish, on the condition stated,
without a firm agreement with the Citrons in place, but staff has been directed to meet and
confer with the Citrons for the purpose of negotiating and presenting a recommended
Disposition and Development Agreement. Except for the foregoing, there was no other
observed reportable action taken by the City Council in Closed Session. It is tecommended
that the letter be received and tiled.
Agenda
-2-
June 20, 1995
b. Letter from the Building Industry Association of San Diego County requesting infonnation
from the City - Daren A. Groth, President, and Donald Worley, Special Counsel, Building
Industry Association, 6336 Greenwich Drive, Suite A, San Diego, CA 92122. It is recommended
that this be referred to staff to respond to the requests.
6. ORDINANCE 2633 AMENDING SECTION 19.04.022 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO
ALLOW MINOR AUTOMOBILE MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR
FACILITIES AS A CONDITIONAL USE IN THE C-C CENTRAL
COMMERCIAL ZONE (second readim! and adoDtion) - This is a proposal
to amend the Municipal Code to allow minor automobile maintenance facilities
by conditional use permit in the C-C Central Commercial zone. The request has
been submitted by Econo Lube '0' Tune, Inc. in conjunction with a conditional
use permit request to establish an automobile maintenance facility at the
soutbwester comer of 30th Street and Edgemere A venue. Staff recommends
Council place the ordinance on second reading and adoption. (Director of
Planning)
7. RESOLUTION 17927 FINDING COMPENSATION OF UNREPRESENTED CITY EMPLOYEES
UNFIXED AND UNCERTAIN - Constitutional constraints surrounding the
City's ability to alter compensation of its employees after service has been
rendered requires Council to adopt the resolution making the finding that
compensation for unrepresented City officers and employees is directly or
indirectly tied to compensation of represented employees and, as such, salaries
of those represented employees may not be fixed and definite on, or perhaps
even sometime after, 7/1/95. Staff recommends approval of the resolution.
(City Manager)
8. RESOLUTION 17928 ESTABLISHING AN APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE FISCAL
YEAR 1995/96 PURSUANT TO ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA
CONSTITUTION - Government Code Section 7910 requires each local
government to establish its Gann Appropriations Limit by resolution each year
at a regularly scheduled meeting or noticed special meeting. Staff recommends
approval of the resolution establishing an appropriations limit of $160,883.640
for fiscal year 1995/96. (Director of Finance)
9. RESOLUTION 17929 APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH MCKINLEY DAVY
ARCHITECTS FOR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES FOR THE OTAY
PARK GYMNASillM PROJECT (CIP-PR-133) - On 5/24/94, Council
approved a Master Plan for Otay Park. The master plan addressed
improvements to a nine acre area which included Otay Park and the open field
area at Otay School. In December 1994. tbe Department issued a Request for
Proposal (RFP) to solicit local architectural/design firms to prepare the plans,
specifications, cost estimates, and any other project related items for the
gymnasium project. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of
Parks & Recreation)
10. RESOLUTION 17930 APPROVING A CONTRACT FOR FIREWORKS DISPLAY AND
ENTERING INTO AN INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT WITH THE
SAN DIEGO UNIFIED PORT DISTRICT - The City is in tbe process of
finalizing plans for the Fourth of July Fireworks display to be conducted on the
Chula Vista Bayfront. A contract with the vendor supplying and launching tbe
fireworks has been finalized, and the City has been asked to enter into an
Indemnification Agreement with the San Diego Unified Port District as part of
their Tidelands Activity Permit. Staff recommends approval of the resolution.
(Director of Parks & Recreation)
Agenda
-3-
June 20, 1995
11. RESOLUTION 17931 APPROVlNG UNCONTROLLED EMBANKMENT AGREEMENT FOR
FILL AT 75 NORTH BROADWAY (BROADWAY PLAZA) - Gatlin
Development Company. co-owner of property comprising the future Broadway
Plaza Shopping Center, has requested that grading work, currently authorized
under grading permit number PG-528, be designated as uncontrolled
embankment. In compliance witb Section 15.04.285 of tbe Municipal Code, all
uncontrolled embankment agreements shall be approved by the Council and
recorded by the City Clerk. Staff recommends approval of tbe resolution.
(Director of Public Works)
12. RESOLUTION 17932 ACCEPTlNG BIDS AND A W ARDlNG CONTRACT FOR THE "BONITA
ROAD WIDENlNG BETWEEN PLAZA BONITA ROAD AND I-80S IN
THE CITY (STM-312)" - On 6/07/95, sealed bids for "Bonita Road Widening
Between Plaza Bonita Road and 1-805" were received. The work to be done
includes removal and disposal of existing improvements, excavation and grading
asphalt concrete pavement, monolithic curb, gutter, and sidewalk, storm drain
and other miscellaneous work shown on the plans. Staff recommends approval
of the resolution and awarding contract to Castillo, Inc. in the amount of
$385,936 contingent upon approval of the 1995/96 CIP budget. (Director of
Public Works)
13. RESOLUTION 17933 APPROPRIATlNG ADDITIONAL FUNDS FROM THE TRAFFIC
SIGNAL FUND TO FUND THE CITY'S SHARE OF THE I-80S AND
OT A Y V ALLEY ROAD lNTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS - The
California Department of Transr.ortation (Caltrans) has let a contract to re-
construct the 1-805 and Otay Val ey Road interchange, which includes two new
traffic signals. Caltrans has billed the City aSfer the City's agreement to share
the costs. Caltrans has tentatively schedule the construction start date this
month and has requested the City's share before beginning construction. Staff
recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Public Works) 4/5th's
vote required.
14. RESOLUTION 17934 ACCEPTlNG BID AND AWARDlNG CONTRACT FOR ASPHALTIC
CONCRETE - Bids were received and opened on 5/31/95, for furnishing
asphaltic concrete to the City for use during the l'eriod of 7/01/95 through
6/30/95. Staff recommends aPl'roval of the resolutIon and award the contract
to Sim J. Harris Company. (DIrector of Public Works)
* * END OF CONSENT CALENDAR * *
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES
The following items have been advertised and/or posted as public hearings as required by law. If you wish to
speak to any item, please fill out the "Request to Speak Form" available in the lobby and submit it to the City
Clerk prior to the meeting. (ComRlete the green form to speak in favor of the staff recommendation; complete
the pink form to speak in opposition to the staff recommendation.) Comments are limited to five minutes per
individuaL.
15.
PUBLIC HEARING
ADDENDUM TO THE 1993 UPDATE OF THE PUBLIC FACILITIES
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE, WITH NO CHANGE IN THE FEE
AMOUNT - On 5/23/95, Council determined that the EI Dorado office building,
315 Fourth Avenue (a facility proximate to the Civic Center and capable of
meeting the City's interim office space needs) is currently available for purchase
at a reasonable price. Council directed staff to pursue the City purchase of the
building as part of the Civic Center DIF. The purchase is anticipated to be an
interim step in the implementation of the Civic Center Master Plan and is not
expected to affect the end cost of the project. The proposed addendum to the
Public Facilities D1F will not impact the level of fees assessed. Staff
recommends this item be continued to 7/11/95. (Deputy City Manager
Krempl/Senior Management Assistant Young)
Agenda
16.
PUBLIC HEARING
-4-
June 20, 1995
DRAFf MULTIPLE SPECIES CONSERVATION PROGRAM (MSCP)
PLAN AND ENVIRONMENT AL IMPACT REPORTIENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT STATEMENT (EIRIEIS) - The City of San Diego has released a
draft MSCP Plan and EIR/EIS for public review and comment. Staff
recommends that the Council direct staff to forward comments to the City of San
Diego regarding the draft Plan and EIR/EIS. (Director of Planning) Continued
from the meeting of 6/13/95.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PCC-94-09: REQUEST TO EXTEND
APPROVAL FOR A PRIVATE SCHOOL FOR APPROXIMATELY
THREE YEARS (THROUGH SEPTEMBER 1999) AND TO ALLOW THE
EXPANSION OF SAID SCHOOL FACILITIES INTO THE SECOND
STORY OF THE BUILDING LOCATED AT 2400 FENTON STREET
WITHIN THE EASTLAKE BUSINESS CENTER - COVENANT
CHRISTIAN SCHOOL - Covenant Christian School was approved by Council
to operate at 2400 Fenton Street within the EastLake Business Center for a 2.5
year period extending through June 1996. The School is requesting to extend
the permit for 3 years (to September 1999) and to expand the operations from
the first floor to include the entire building and to increase the maximum
enrollment from 208 to 260 children. Staff recommends this item be
continued to 7/11/95. (Director of Planning) Continued from the meeting
of 5/23/95.
RESOLUTION 17904 DENYING A REQUESTED TIME EXTENSION BUT APPROVING A
REQUESTED EXPANSION OF AN EXISTING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT (PCC-94-09) TO COVENANT CHRISTIAN SCHOOL TO
OPERATE A PRIVATE SCHOOL AT 2400 FENTON SfREET WITHIN
THE EASTLAKE BUSINESS CENTER
17.
PUBLIC HEARING
18.
PUBLIC HEARING
PCS-95-05: TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR PARCEL R-28,
TRACT 95-05, INVOLVING DEVELOPMENT OF 51 DETACHED
CONDOMINIUM DWELLINGS AND LOCATED WITHIN THE
EASTLAKE GREENS PLANNED COMMUNITY - EASTLAKE
DEVELOPMENT COMPANY - The proposal is to subdivide6.0 acres of land
into nine lots, four residential lots and five open space lots, and develop a gate-
guarded residential community of 51 detached single-family condominium
dwellings. The project site is located along the north side of Clubhouse Drive
between Greensview Drive and Hunte Parkway within the EastLake Greens
Planned Community. The project, as conditioned, is in compliance with the
EastLake Greens SPA and PC District regulations. Staff recommends approval
of the resolution. (Director of Planning)
RESOLUTION 17935 APPROVING AND IMPOSING CONDITIONS ON THE TENTATIVE
SUBDIVISION MAP FOR EASTLAKE GREENS UNIT 28, TRACT 95-05,
MAKING THE NECESSARY FINDINGS AND READOPTING THE
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND THE MITIGATION
MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM FOR IS-94-19
ORAL COMMUNICA nONS
This is an opportunity for the general public to address the City Council on any subject matter within the
Council's jurisdiction that is not an item on this agenda for public discussion. (State law, however, generally
prohibits the City Council from taking action on any issues not included on the posted agenda.) If you wish to
address the Council on such a subject, please complete the yellow "Request to Speak Under Oral Communications
Form" available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Those who wish to speak,
please give your name and address for record purposes and follow up action. Your time is limited to three
minutes per speaker.
Agenda
-5-
June 20, 1995
BOARD AND COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
This is the time the City Council will consider items which have been forwarded to them for consideration by one
of the City's Boards, Commissions and/or Committees,
19.
REPORT
SELECT RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE GROWTH
MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION'S (GMOC) 1994 ANNUAL
REPORT PERTAINING TO THE FISCAL YEAR 1995/96 BUDGET - On
6/1195, the GMOC finalized its 1994 Annual Report to Council and identified
several of its reconunendations which have potential for budget and/or staffing
implications during fiscal year 1995/96. The GMOC felt it was important that
Council receive the report prior to closing deliberations on the fiscal year
1995/96 budget. It is recommended that Council direct staff to return with a
specific work program which addresses the proposed timing for responding to
the GMOC's concerns in conjunction with the CouncillGMOC workshop to be
held in late July. (Growth Management Oversight Commission)
ACTION ITEMS
The items listed in this section of the agenda are expected to elicit substantwl discussions and deliberations by
the Council, staff, or members of the general public. The items will be considered individually by the Council
and staff recommendations may in certain cases be presented in the alternative. Those who wish to speak, please
jill out a "Request to Speak" fonn avaiwble in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting.
Public comments are limited to jive minutes.
20.A. RESOLUTION 17936 MAKING AWARD FOR SALE OF BONDS AND APPROVING THE
THIRD AMENDMENT TO ACQUISITION/FINANCING AGREEMENT
FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NUMBER 94-1 (EASTLAKE GREENS II)
AND AUTHORIZING THE MA YOR TO EXECUTE SAME - The proposed
resolution awards the bond sale to the lowest bidder and approves the third
amendment to the Acquisition/Financing Agreement. The amendment
establishes the procedure to ensure compliance with the 2 % Maximum Tax and
is the closing resolution for the legislative proceedings for Assessment District
94-1. Staff recommends Council accept the report and approve the resolution.
(Director of Public Works and Director of Finance)
B. REPORT PROPOSED PROCEDURE TO ENSURE COMPLIANCE WITH THE
COUNCIL POLICY REQUIRING THAT THE AGGREGATE OF ALL
COUNTYT AXES, MELLO-ROOS SCHOOL TAXES, AND ASSESSMENT
INSTALLMENTS DOES NOT EXCEED 2% OF THE SALE PRICE OF A
HOUSE
21. RESOLUTION 17937 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH SOUTHWESTERN COMMUNITY
COLLEGE DISTRICT FOR THE OPERATION OF THE CHULA VISTA
BORDER ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY RESOURCE CENTER
(BETRC) - An agreement between the City and Southwestern College is
required by the Economic Development Administration before they can begin
operation of the BETRC at the donated Rohr facility. Staff recommends
approval of the resolution. (Director of Community Development)
ITEMS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR
This is the time the City Council will discuss items which have been removed from the Consent Calendar.
Agenda items pulled at the request of the public will be considered prior to those pulled by Councilmembers.
Public comments are limited to jive minutes per individual.
Agenda
-6-
June 20, 1995
OTHER BUSINESS
22. CITY MANAGER'S REPORTlS)
a. Scheduling of meetings.
23. MAYOR'S REPORTlS)
24. COUNCIL COMMENTS
Councilmember Rindone
a. Revised Olympic Training Center (OTe) Monument Sign.
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting will adjourn to (a closed session and thence to) a Special Worksession/Meeting on Wednesday, June
21, 1995 at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Conference Room, thence to the Regular City Council Meeting on June 27,
1995 at 4:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers.
A Special Worksession/Meeting of the City Council will be held immediately following the Regular City Council
Meeting.
A Meeting of the Redevelopment Agency will be held immediately following the City Council Meeting.
*****
CLOSED SESSION
Unless the City Attorney, the City Manager or the City Council states otherwise at this time, the Council will
discuss and deliberate on the following items of business which are pemlitted by law to be the subject of a closed
session discussion, and which the Council is advised should be discussed in closed session to best protect the
interests of the City. The Council is required by law to return to open session, issue any reports of final action
taken in closed session, and the votes taken. However, due to the typical length of time taken up by closed
sessions, the videotaping will be terminated at this point in order to save costs so that the Council's return from
closed session, reports of final action taken, and adjournment will not be videotaped. Nevertheless, the report
of final action taken will be recorded in the minutes which will be available in the City Clerk's Office.
25. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING:
1. Existing litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9
. Rose Marie Gogue vs. the City of Chula Vista.
. Chula Vista and nine other cities vs. the County of San Diego regarding solid waste
issues (trash litigation).
2. Anticipated litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9
. Metro Sewer Adjustment Billing (water reclamation and expansion costs) and EPA
lawsuit.
Agenda
-7-
June 20, 1995
CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR - Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6
. Agency negotiator: John Goss or designee for CVEA, WCE, POA, IAFF, Executive
Management, Mid-Management, and Unrepresented.
Employee organization: Chula Vista Employees Association (CVEA) and Western Council of
Engineers (WeE), Police Officers Association (PDA) and International Association of Fire
Fighters (IAFF).
Unrepresented employee: Executive Management, Mid-Management, and Unrepresented.
PUBLIC EMPLOYEE PERFORMANCE EVALUATION - Pursuant to Government Code Section
54957
. City Manager
26. REPORT OF ACTIONS TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION
*****
/" declare Nnder It .
pena y of perjury that I am
e~,'ol'ed by the City of Chula Vista in the
01fice of the City "Ierl' ~nA.' t I
thi Ad' '- \"';.J U la pasted
Tuesday. June 20, 1995 th s P g:,~ a/Notice on tlie Buli";;n Board at
6:00 p.m. e u IC Services BUilding and at Cit H
(Immediately following the Re~Y C~l Mee~NED S Y II" on
~5/'?J" ~:? ..
Soecial Worksessionl eetm. of the City of Chula ~itv Council
Council Chambers
Public Services Buildmg
CALL TO ORDER
1.
ROLL CALL:
Council members Alevy _' Moot _, Padilla _, Rindone _, and
Mayor Horton _'
BUSINESS
2. REVIEW OF DEPARTMENTAL BUDGETS AND CARRY-OVER ITEMS
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
This is an opportunity for the general public to address Ihe City Council on any subject mailer within Ihe
Council'sjurisdiction Ihal is nol an ilem on Ihis agenda for public discussion. (Slale law, howe.er, generally
prohibits Ihe City Council from laking action on any issues nol included on Ihe posled agenda.) If you wish 10
address Ihe Council on such a subjecl, please complele Ihe yellow. Requesllo Speak Under Oral Communications
Fonn. a.ailable in Ihe lobby and submit it 10 Ihe City Clerk prior 10 Ihe meeling. Those who wish 10 speak,
please gi.e your name and address for record purposes and follow up aClion. Your time is limited to Ihree
minules per speaker.
OTHER BUSINESS
3. CITY MANAGER'S REPORTlS)
a. Scheduling of meetings.
4. MAYOR'S REPORTCS)
5. COUNCIL COMMENTS
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting will adjourn to a Special WorksessionlMeeting on Wednesday, June 21, 1995 at 6:00 p.m. in the
Council Conference Room, thence to the Regular City Council Meeting on June 27, 1995 at 4:00 p.m. in the City
Council Chambers.
* * * COMPLIANCE WITH AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT * * *
The City of Chula Vista, in complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), request individuals who
require special accommodations to access, attend, and/or participate in a City meeting, activity, or service request
sucb accommodation at least forty-eight hours in advance for meetings and five days for scheduled services and
activities. Please contact the City Clerk for specific information at (619) 691-5041 or Telecommunications Devices
for the Deaf (TOO) (619) 585-5655. California Relay Service is also available for the hearing impaired.
Notice is hereb)' given, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956, that the Mayor and City Council
of the Cit~ of Chula V,sta has called and will convene a Special Worksession/Meeting of the City Council on
Tuesday, June 20,1995 at 6:00 p.m" immediately following the Regular City Council Meeting, in the Council
Chambers, Public Services Building, 276 Fourth A venue, Chula Vista, CA.
June 15, 1995
SUBJECT:
The Honorable Mayor and City cou~~
John D. Goss, ci ty Manage~~ ~ ~ \
City council Meeting of June 2~, ;;95
TO:
FROM:
This will transmit the agenda and related materials for the regular
city council meeting of Tuesday, June 20, 1995. Comments regarding
the written Communications are as follows:
5a. This is a letter from the City Attorney stating that as a
result of deliberations that occurred in Closed Session on
6/13/95, although not legally required to be reported, but
with the consent of the entire Redevelopment Agency, the City
Attorney reports that the Agency expressed the intention that
they would proceed with the demolition of the Fuller Ford site
after getting verification from soils testing, if the cost of
remediation in the Agency's judgment, is not excessive. It is
further the present intent of the Council to demolish on the
condition stated, without a firm agreement with the citrons in
place, but staff has been directed to meet and confer with the
citrons for the purpose of negotiating and presenting a
recommended Disposition and Development Agreement. Except for
the foregoing, there was no other observed reportable action
taken by the city Council in Closed Session. IT IS
RECOMMENDED THAT THE LETTER BE RECEIVED AND FILED.
5b. This is a letter from the Building Industry Association of San
Diego County requesting information from the City regarding
development impact fees. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THIS REQUEST
BE REFERRED TO STAFF TO RESPOND TO ADMINISTRATIVELY.
The attached agenda is prepared for Council's consideration. It
includes items which staff believes can be easily passed on consent
and/or require little discussion.
Also included on this agenda are items which must be acted upon
prior to the end of the fiscal year. Those items include Agenda
Items Nos. 7, 8, 10, 12, 14 and 21. Given the complexity of the
budgetary items carried over to tonight's work session, should
council pull an agenda item, IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT IT BE CONTINUED
TO JUNE 27 (IF IT REQUIRES ACTION PRIOR TO THE END OF THE FISCAL
YEAR) OR TO A FUTURE MEETING.
SWM:mab
~J~
=~~
--~--
~"'"~~
~~- ~
ClN OF
CHUlA VISTA
OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY
Date:
June 14, 1995
From:
The Honorable Mayor and City coullitL
Bruce M. Boogaard, city AttorneYI~~
Report Regarding Actions Taken in Closed Session
for the Meeting of 6/13/95
To:
Re:
The purpose of this letter is to announce that as a result of
deliberations that occurred in Closed Session on June 13, 1995,
although not legally required to be reported, but with the consent
of the entire Redevelopment Agency, the City Attorney reports that
the Agency expressed the intention that they would proceed with the
demolition of the Fuller Ford site after getting verification from
soils testing, if the cost of remediation in the Agency's judgment,
is not excessive. It is further the present intent of Council to
demolish, on the condition stated, without a firm agreement with
the citrons in place, but staff has been directed to meet and
confer with the citrons for the purpose of negotiating and
presenting a recommended Disposition and Development Agreement.
Except for the foregoing, there was no other observed reportable
action taken by the city Council in Closed Session.
BMB:lgk
C:\lt\clossess.rep
Sa-j
276 FOURTH AVE/CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 91910/(619) 691-5037
6336 Greenwich Drive, Suite A
San D.ego, CA 92122.5994
(619)450.1221
FAX No, (619) 552.1445
PRESIDENT
Deren A. Groth
The PacificHerilage
Company
VICE PRESIDENT
lanM,GIII
tlighland Partnership, Inc.
TREASURER
Chris J, Chambers
Continental Homes
SECRETARY
Mark D, McMillin
McMillin Communities
EXECUTIVE
ViCE PRESIDENT
Paul A. Tryon
ConstruCllOn industry
Federation
California Bi.Jild1ng
Industry Association
National Association
of Home Builders
-- -.J. ------~--
BUILDING INDUSTRY
ASSOCIA TION OF
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
RECE.IVEQ
[('~:"~ ~.
~ l.JL:,...D ,:,'
~' IU~'Jl '1 "..~,
r. \.i
MAYOR'S 0,''''/;'' I
c;. Chu,a Vista, ~Ac ./
':/
~:n-~ "
City ofChula Vista
Attn: Mayor & City Council
276 4th Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
ClY OF CHULA VIS
CIrf CLE"K'S OFFh
Dear Mayor & City Council
The Building Industry Association of San Diego (BIA) continues to be keenly
interested in the affordability of housing in San Diego As the State Legislature has
recognized, and BIA has proven in court, land use regulations can dramatically increase
the costs of housing to the public, Development impact fees, in particular, are a
significant factor in the cost of housing BIA has established a continuing program to
monitor the collection and expenditure of development impact fees as authorized
under appropriate provisions of law.
As you are aware, Government Code section 66006 (a) I provides that a local agency
shall establish separate capital facility accounts for each improvement funded by
development fees
Section 66006 (b) provides that for each separate account established, a local agency
shall, within 60 days of the close of each fiscal year, make available to the public the
following information (J) the account's beginning and ending balance for the fiscal
year; (2) the amount offees, interest, and other income in the account; (3) the amount
of expenditure for each public facility or improvement made from the account during
the fiscal year; and (4) the amount of any refunds made pursuant to section 66001(e).
Section 66001 (d) prOVides that five years after collecting a deveiopment fee, iocai
agencies 1 shall make findings once each subsequent fiscal year with respect to any
portion of the fee remaining unexpended or uncommitted, The findings must identify
the purpose to which the fee is to be put and demonstrate a reasonable relationship
between the fee and the purpose for which it was originally charged
I All further references will be to the Government Code
1 Cities, counties, school districts, special districts, authorities, agencies, and any
other municipal public corporation or district, or other political subdivision or the state
(Gov, Code sec. 66000 (c).)
(f q1t(i) W~I'ff~ ~OMMUNI~i~~y
CT.
V
City of Chula Vista
June 9,1995
Page Two
As pan of its goals and objectives for the current year, BIA's Board has directed that BIA conduct a
survey oflocal agencies to determine compliance with these imponant laws. Accordingly, pursuant to the
California Public Records Act (sec. 6250, et seq), BIA hereby requests access to the following
information: (1) the type, purpose, and amount of all development fees collected by your agency since
January I, 1989; (2) the pany(ies) who paid the fees; (3) the current location in your chan ofaccounts of
any unexpended or uncommitted fees;) (4) the annual accounting information described in section 66006
(b) for all development fees collected by your agency since January 1, 1989; and (5) the findings prescribed
by section 66001 (d), for those fees which are unexpended or uncommitted five years after collection
Please advise us whether you agency has established any fee pursuant to section 6257 for copying the
documents requested hereunder, and, if so, the amount of the fee 4
In your response, please indicate the approximate volume of documents responsive to this request Please
also attach to your response a copy of your regulations, if any, concerning the procedures to be followed
for obtaining records under the California Public Records Act
In addition, BIA requests copies ofthe following documents for the most recent fiscal year
(I) Auditor's annual repon;
(2) Chan of accounts;
(3) Capital Improvement Program
) Please include the criteria by which your agency determines whether a fee is committed or
uncommitted
4 Please note that we are not at this time requesting copies of this information, but if and when we do, the
costs should be limited to the "direct costs of duplication". (sec 6257). Staff time in assembling documents
is not chargeable. (Nonh Countv Parents Ore~ni7.l\tion etc. v. Dept. of Education (1994) 223 Cal.App.4th
144.) Also, to anticipate any objection based on the "pending litigation" exemption of see 6254 (b), we
invite your attention to a 1988 California Attorney General Opinion (71 Ops.Cal.Atty.Gen. 23S):
"Records generated in the ordinary course ofa public agency's business which may be relevant in
future litigation to which the agency might be a pany are not exempt from disclosure under subdivision (b)
of section 6254 before a claim is filed with the agency or litigation against it commences Nor do such
records become exempt from disclosure under the subdivision once a claim is filed or litiiation a!J.ainst the
asencv actuallv commences. [Emphasis added.]"
.3/J - ~
City of Chula Vista
June 9,1995
Page Three
Please submit this information by June 30 to:
Building Industry Association, 6336 Greenwich Drive, Suite A, San Diego, CA 92122
Please also acknowledge receipt of this letter and identify the person in your agency whom we can contact
to resolve any questions about this request. If you have any questions, please contact Paul Tryon,
Executive Vice President or Craig Benedetto, Legislative Advocate at (619) 450-1221.
Thank you for your courtesy and cooperation.
Sincerely,
~~:f.~f
Special Counsel, BIA
~
Daren A Groth
President, BIA
CC: City Manager
Finance Manager
S-b ~3
It~G
~\O~ Meeting Da~<)~/ct::'
t-QJ
ITEM TITLE: c,~t~c Hearing: PCA-95-04 - Consideration of amendments to Section
(.r)-Q\~ 19.04.022 and 19.36.030 of the Municipal Code to allow "minor
~ ~ automobile maintenance and repair" as a conditional use in the C-C
cF~ Central Commercial zone - Econo Lube 'n' Tune, Inc.
e:,~
COUNCn.. AGENDA STATEMENT
Ordinance ~~?~ Amending Section 19.04.022 and 19.36.030
of the Municipal Code to allow minor automobile maint~nance and repair
facilities as a conditional use in the C-C Central Commercial zone
SUBl\UlTED BY: Director of Planning pt
REVIEWED BV, Cky ......" ~ ZJ ~ (41"'" V"" V~-"...xl
This is a proposal to amend the Municipal Code to allow minor automobile maintenance facilities
by conditional use permit in the C-C Central Commercial zone. The request has been submitted
by Econo Lube 'n' Tune, Inc. in conjunction with a conditional use permit request to establish
an automobile maintenance facility at the southwest comer of 30th Street and Edgemere Avenue.
The Environmental Review Coordinator has conducted an Initial Study, IS-95-17, of potential
environmental impacts associated with the proposal. Based on the attached Initial Study and
comments thereon, the Coordinator has concluded that potential significant environmental
impacts from the project can be mitigated to less than significant, and recommends adoption of
the Mitigated Negative Declaration issued on IS-95-17.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the Ordinance amending the Municipal
Code to allow minor automobile maintenance and repair facilities as a conditional use in the C-C
Central Commercial zone.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: On May 10, 1995, the Planning
Commission voted 5-0 to recommend approval of the amendments in accordance with Resolution
PCA-95-04. The Commission also voted 5-0 to approve the conditional use permit for Econo
Lube 'n' Tune in accordance with Resolution PCC-95-22 and contingent upon approval of these
amendments.
On February 16, 1995, the Resource Conservation Commission voted 4-0 to recommend
adoption of the Negative Declaration issued on IS-95-17.
~
~-l
Page 2, Item ,/
Meeting Date ~
The Design Review Committee will consider the Econo 4I1>e 'n~ Tune site plan and architecture
on June 12, 1995. Their action will be reported to the COuncil at the hearing.
DISCUSSION:
. .
The Central Commercial zone presently allows automobile service stations by conditional use
permit, and minor automobile repair as an accessory use (to a department store, for instance)
but the C-C zone does not currently allow auto repair as an independent use. The proposal is
to expand the definition of minor auto repair to include the maintenance activities associated with
modem lube and tune facilities, and allow such facilities as an independent use by conditional
use permit in the C-C zone.
In years past, when service stations truly provided all services needed by the driving public,
automotive maintenance facilities were not necessary. Now, however, with the advent of self-
serve gas stations that provide mini-marts and car washes but little, if any, service, separate
automotive maintenance facilities have come into being to fill that need. These types of
operations are generally not as intensive or potentially onerous as general automotive repair uses,
and they typically provide limited services such as oil changes, replacement of automotive fluids,
etc. in a professional, efficient and timely manner.
Lube and tune facilities are meeting the needs of the driving public in the most convenient way
possible. They are usually located on major thoroughfares, and often close to shopping areas
which permit the customer to leave their car for a short time to do grocery shopping or other
errands. This concept is what makes it viable for several of the major department stores to
include auto centers as accessory uses to their stores.
In staff's opinion, the automotive maintenance concept is basically the same as the "automotive
repair (minor)" category that already exists in the Code. In further reviewing the Code, staff
also determined that this type of use as a stand-alone use adjacent to other commercial uses
would be essentially the same as the minor automotive service and repair historically performed
at service stations and probably less impactive than many of the repair activities that are
performed at the automotive centers associated with major department stores, which are typically
located in the C-C zone.
The requirement for a conditional use permit will assure that individual sites will be reviewed
properly. Site specific review would address issues such as compatibility with adjacent uses and
the neighborhood, and would evaluate potential impacts from noise, traffic, and so on. In those
cases where it is determined that the use is problematic, the CUP can be appropriately
conditioned or denied.
Attached is a survey prepared by the applicant showing the manner in which lube and tunes are
treated in other jurisdictions. As indicated in the chart, most communities allow such facilities
~
G.:.-
_3'1~
Meeting Dat
by conditional use permit in their basic or general retail commercial zones. These zones are
comparable to our C-C Central Commercial zone.
For the reasons noted, we are recommending approval of the request in accordance with the
attaChed ordinance.
FISCAL IMPACT: The costs of processing this request will be paid for by the applicant from
a deposit account. The charges to date total approximately $4,500.
Attachments
1. Council Ordinance
2. Planning Commission Resolution PCA-95-04
3. planning Commission Minutes
4. Chart from Econo Lube 'n' Tune
5. Resource Conservation Commission Minutes
6. Negative Declaration IS-95-17
7. Disclosure Statement
8. Project Locator and Plans for 30th & Edgemere
(m: 1Ilome\PIannin&\PCA9S-04 ,ee)
~3
THIS PAGE BLANK
~
<....-f
SccON.
'D R~Dl
ORDINANCE NO. ~(,~~ 'NG A.NO "'Do
'P"rIOfv
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AMENDING SECTION 19.04.022 AND
19.36.030 OF THE MUNICIPAL CODE TO AlLOW MINOR
AUTOMOBILE MAINTENANCE AND REPAIR FACll1TIES
IN THE C-C CENTRAL COMMERCIAL ZONE SUBJECT TO
APPROVAL OF A CONDmONAL USE PERMIT
WHEREAS, the Municipal Code does not presently differentiate between automotive
repair and automotive maintenance; and
WHEREAS, the advent of self-serve gas stations bas created a need for automotive
maintenance facilities; and
WHEREAS, the Municipal Code does not permit automotive repair shops (minor) in the
C-C zone as a primary use; and
WHEREAS, Beono Lube 'n' Tune, Inc. bas submitted a request to amelld the Municipal
Code to allow for automotive maintenance facilities in the C-C zone upon issuance of a
conditional use permit; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission received and considered the request to initiate an
amendment at its meeting of September 28, 1994, and referred the matter to staff for a report
and recommendation; and
WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator bas collducted an Initial Study, IS-
95-17, and bas determined that there are no potentia1 significant environmental impacts
associated with the amendments to the Municipal Code and recommends adoption of the
Negative Declaration issued on IS-95-17; and
WHEREAS, on Feb1ll81"Y 16. 1995, the Resource Conservation Commission voted 4-0
to recommend approval of the Negative Declaration issued on IS-95-17; and
WHEREAS, on May 10, 1995. the City Plannil1g Commi~sion voted 5-0 to recommend
that the City Council adopt the amendments to the Municipal Code in accordance with
Resolution PCA-95-04; and
WHEREAS. the City Clerk set the time and place for a hearing on said amendments to
the Municipal Code, and notice of said hearing together with its purpose was given by its
publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the City at least 10 days prior to the hearing;
and
~-~
,WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely June 13,
1995, in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the City Council and said hearing I
........'
was thereafter closed.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby find,
determine and ordain as follows:
SECTION I: That there are no potential significant environmental impacts associated
with the amendments and hereby adopts the Negative Declaration issued on IS-95-17.
SECTION D: That the public necessity, convenience, general welfare, and good zoning
practice justify the amendments, and that the amendments are consistent with the City of Chula
Vista General Plan.
SECTION ill: That Section 19.04.022 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code is amended
to read as follows:
19.04.022 Automobile IIR!!IIIlII repair, minor
"li~;~\;~:e!~~'! r::~; =: !!!!~!;siJ#a!!!!
not exceeding one and one-half tons capacity, but not including other operations named
under "automobile repair, major" or similar thereto as determined by the commission.
SECTION IV: That Section 19.36.030 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code is amended
to read as follows:
19.36.030 Conditional uses.
Conditional uses in the C-C zone include:
A. Car washes, subject to the provisions of Section 19.58.060;
B. Skating rinks, subject to the conditions of Section 19.58,040;
C. Signs in excess of maximum as established in Section 19.36.040 of this chapter;
D. Automobile rental and towing service;
E. Billiard parlors;
F. Bowling alleys, subject to the provisions of Section 19.58.040;
G. Social and fraternal organizations (nonprofit), subject to the provisions of Section
19.58.100;
~
t..-b
H.
I.
J.
K.
L.
M.
N.
O.
Trailer rentals;
Veterinarian clinic, subject to the provisions of Section 19.58.050;
Unclassified uses. See Chapter 19.54;
=~;._~rovisions of Section 19.58.2~
w.....{.......~~ .,.......w.w.{...~. w. .w.'''":-;......w..,.,..,~.........., ...:<<*, .'>>.x.;.:.,. ...: ".' .."
Cardrooms;
Roof-mounted satellite dishes subject to the standard set forth in Section
19.30.040.
Recycling collection centers, subject to the provisions of Section 19.58.340.
Mixed commercial-residential projects, subject to the provisions of Section
19.58.205.
SECTION V: This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force and effect on the
thirtieth day from and after its second reading and adoption.
Presented by
~
Bruce M. Boog
City Attorney
Robert A. Leiter
Director of Planning
(a:-'.Ord)
~~) / ~A'1q
~
\
'"
"
,
c.- j} lo-~q
~
PLANNING COMMISSION
RESOLUTION PCA-95-04
Yt/~
~11=..lS1'~
TInS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFI' BLANK
"
TJ, -JV
RESOLUTION NO. PCA-95-04
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDING TO TIlE CITY COUNCIL
TIlE ADOPTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER
19.04.022 AND 19.36.30 OF TIlE MUNICIPAL CODE
RELATING TO MINOR AUTOMOTIVE MAINTENANCE AND
REPAIR FACIUTIES
WHEREAS, the Municipal Code does not presently differentiate between automotive
repair and automotive maintenance; and
WHEREAS, the advent of self-serve gas stations bas created a need for automotive
maintenance facilities; and
WHEREAS, the Municipal Code does not permit automotive repair shops (minor) in the
CC zone as a primary use; and
WHEREAS, Beono Lube 'n' Tune, Inc. has submitted a request to amend the Municipal
Code to allow for automobile maintenance in the C-C zone upon the issuance of a conditional
use permit; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission received and considered the request to initiate an
amendment at its meeting of September 28, 1994, and referred the matter to staff for a report
and recommendation; and
WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator bas conducted an Initial Study,
IS-95-17, and has determined that there are no potential significant environmental impacts
associated with the amendments to the Municipal Code and recommends adoption of the
Negative Declaration issued on IS-95-17.
WHEREAS, the Planning Director set the time and place for a bearing on said
amendment and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose was given by its publication in
a newspaper of general circulation in the City at least ten days prior to the hearing; and
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised namely 7:00 p.m.,
May 10, 1995, in the Council Chambers, 276 Fourth Avenue, before the plAnning Commission
and said hearing was thereafter closed; and
WHEREAS, the Commission found that the project would have no significant
environmental impacts and adopted the Negative Declaration issued on IS-95-17.
NOW, TIIEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT FROM TIlE FACTS PRESENTED
AT TIlE HEARING, TIlE PLANNING COMMISSION recommends that the City Council
adopt the Draft City Council Ordinance based on the rlDdings contained therein.
f!(/~~/ I
That a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the City Council.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY TIlE PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA,
CAliFORNIA, this 10th day of May, 1995 by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES: Commissioners Tuchscher, Fuller, Ray, Salas and Tarantino
NOES: None
ABSENT: Commissioner Willett (excused)
~ y ~-:..
William C. Tuchscher n, Chair
Attest:
~ '16 ~ ;1L:ty
N cy pley, Secreta
(.:Ipc:a9S04....)
,
;Yt'J,;L.
PLANNING COMMISSION
MINUTES
~ ?--J)
Excemt from 5/10/95 Plannhll! Commission Minutes
ITEM 1:
PUBUC HEARING: PCA-95-04 - CONSIDERATION OF AMENDMENTS TO
lHE MUNICIPAL CODE TO INCLUDE AUTOMOBILE MAINTENANCE AS
A CONDmONAL USE PERMIT IN 1HE C-C CENTRAL COMMERCIAL
ZONE
Principal Planner Griffm stated that the proposal had been submitted by Econo Lube 'n' Tune,
Inc., and proceeded with the presentation of the staff report. Staff recommended that the
Planning Commission endorse the amendment in accordance with Resolution PCA-95-04, which
was included in their packets.
This being the time and the place as advertised, the public hearing was opened.
Marilyn Ponseggi, 2117 Jarama Ct., EI Clijon 92019, representing the applicant, stated they
were in concurrence with staff recommendation. She was available for questions.
Commissioner Ray clarified that when the area was noticed, National City was also noticed.
Mr. Griffm confirmed that National City had been noticed, as a matter of routine, using the
same guidelines regardless of the jurisdiction. Replying to Commissioner Ray, Mr. Griffm
stated there had been no negative feedback in writing; there may be someone present in
opposition to the conditional use permit. There were no comments regarding the zoning text
amendment or the conditional use permit prior to the hearing, unless there were some regarding
the initial environmental study relating to both this item and the following.
Associate Planner Reid stated there were no comments on the first item from representatives of
National City; there was one inquiry on the second.
No one else wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed.
MSUC (Fuller/Ray) 5-0 (Commissioner Willett excused) to approve Resolution PCA-95-04.
~-)tj
CHART FROM
ECONO LUBE 'N' TUNE
~
~-f3 / ~-)S-
II
ill
15ft
!ii
. ~-J /?
~
1 !
1
I I . I
! 5) t
1 I
I 1 I) f
1 5
, I , I
1 I I
I 15
'I I 1 1
5 I{ I 1 I
I . I I
I I
I I. I
5 .
a -
. I II I . ~ .
, I I I i I
I ~ I II I I I
~ - II
i I I I
i ~
5 I 1 ~ II H I I !
I a: ~Ih n II
I ~
. . I 1 I
I ! ~ :1 ~ II
I ~f1 II ~ ~
I : ~ ~~ ~ II - g
. u . .
I' = i I
5 f !
! .
! III 1 I ;
~
3 !fl i g
Ii ! I ~ !
g i oJ
II I II ! I I ~ I I I . I i I I
-
i:l i i i
l I I I I I I I I I I I
I I I I
I I I
I I I I J r I I I I I
I I I I I I , I
.. I I I
It I I I I I J I I
! m "
I I
I
a ~
.5
I .
I 1
!
. I
, I
J
J
I
U .5 I
il I I
J
I
i l I I
~
.5 ! i
J~
J Ii
! i i
1 III 1 I
I!
~(,) ! -
Ii
~
.5
Ii lJ
!
1 II :1
~
II I ~ 1I I I
i i i
I I I I I I
I
f ci I I I
..
I I I I
I I I
I I
~~
cf-)7
/
I
-/~
/~'/6
\
,
\
RESOURCE CONSERVATION
COMMISSION
MINUTES
~/7...
6:30 p.m.
Thursdav February] 6. 1994
Ml)I,1JTES OF A SPECIAL MEETING
Resource Conserntion Commission
Chula Vista, California
Council Conference Room
City Hall Buildini
CALL MEETING TO ORDERIROLL CALL: The meeting was called to order at 6:44 p.m. by
Chair Burrascano.
MEMBERS PRESENT:
Chair Burrascano, Commissioners Hall, Fisher, and Marquez
STAFF PRESENT: Environmental Review Coordinator Doug Reid, Special Planning Projects
Manager Jerry Jamriska, Senior Planner Rick Rosaler
Environmental Review Coordinator Doug Reid advised that commissioner Ghougassian had submiued
his letter of resignation and that there was a question as to whether Vice Chair Guerrero's seat was now
vacant.
PRESENTATION OF PROJECTS
1. Review of Negathe Declaration 15-95-16, Econo Lube'n Tune, Inc.
2. Review of Negative Declaration for 15-95-17, Econo Lube'n Tu~e, Inc. Code Amendment
Staff Presentation
Mr. Reid advised lhat the code amendmenl was to be considered first since this would aClually
permit the proposed use. He reviewed the development proposed by Econo Lube'n Tune as well
as the code amendment which would allow automotive maintenance in certain commercial and
industrial zones. Mr. Reid noted that the applicalions will be considered by the Planning
Commission in lale March. He introduced Marilyn Ponseggi who represented the applicants.
Commission Discussion
Commissioner Hall noted that letters to the editor have appeared in the paper from neighbors
in the project area, complaining that they do not receive notices on projects, . Mr, Reid stated
that they had been noticed regarding environmental review on the Food 4 Less project, and lhal
this project had also been noticed. .
Commissioner Fisher questioned the drainage, asking about the potential for fuels to wash into
the drainage channel; Commissioner Marquez voiced similar concerns, noting the proximity of
the proposed building to the nood channel. Ms. Ponseggiresponded that this was not a problem
per Se with the proposed code amendment. With respect to the proposed development project,
Ms. Ponseggi reviewed Econo Lube'n Tune's safety and storage procedures and pointed oUllhal
this facility conducts auto maintenance activities but no automotive repair.
M5UC (Hall/Fisher) (4-0) to accept Negative Declaration 15-95-16, with the condition that any
Army Corp of Engineers recommendations or requirements for this site be adhered to; and to
accept Negative Declaralion 15-95-17.
~ ~~.2{/
NEGATIVE
DECLARATION
18-95-17
~~J
TIllS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
"
~d--
ADDENDUM TO MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
:IS 95-17
PROJECT NAME: Automotive Maintenance Facility Code Amendment
PROJECT LOCATION: City wide
PROJECT APPLICANT: Econo Lube 'n' Tune, Inc.
PROJECT AGENT: Marilyn ponseggi
CASE NUMBER:
IS-95-17A
DATE:
May 30, 1995
I. INTRODUCTION
The environmental review procedures of the City of Chula Vista
allow the Environmental Review Coordinator (ERC) to prepare an
addendum to a Negative Declaration or Environmental Impact
Report (EIR) , if one of the following conditions is present:
1. The minor changes in the project design which have
occurred since completion of the Final EIR or Negative
Declaration have not created any new significant
environmental impacts not previously addressed in the
Final EIR or Negative Declaration;
2. Additional or refined information available since
completion of the Final EIR or Negative Declaration
regarding the potential environmental impact of the
project, or regarding the measures or alternatives
available to mitigate potential environmental effects of
the project, does not show that the project will have one
or more significant impacts which were not previously
addressed in the Final EIR or Negative Declaration.
IS-95-17 analyzed the potential environmental impacts
associated with a Code Amendment to Allow for Automotive
Maintenance in the C-B,C-C, C-V and C-T zones upon issuance
of a Conditional Use Permit.
Subsequent to the completion of that document, the Code
Amendment was only pursued in the C-C zone. The proposal is
to expand the definition of minor auto repair as inclusive of
maintenance facilities associated with modern lube and tune
facilities, and allow such facilities as an independent use by
conditional use permit in the C-C zone.
f-R- ( 9/~ ~ ;Z J
Therefore, in accordance with Section 15164 of the CEQA
Guidelines, the City has prepared the following addendum to
the Mitigated Negative Declaration for the proposed Code
Amendment.
This addendum supersedes the previous Mitigated Negative
Declaration IS-95-17. An Addendum need not be circulated for
public review, but instead becomes an attachment to the
previously issued Negative Declaration IS-95-17.
II. PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
The proposed project is City-wide.
III. PROJECT BACKGROUND AND HISTORY
The Central Commercial zone presently allows automobile
service stations by conditional use permit, and minor
automobile repair as an accessory use (to a department store,
for instance) but the C-C zone does not currently allow auto
repair as an independent use.
In years past, when service stations truly provided all
services needed by the driving public, automotive maintenance
facilities were not necessary. Now, however, with the advent
of self-serve gas service stations that provide mini-markets
and car washes but little, if any, automotive service,
separate automotive maintenance facilities have come into
being to fill that need. These types of operations are not as
intensive or onerous as general automotive repair uses, and
typically provide limited services such as oil changes,
replacement automotive fluids, etc. in a professional,
efficient and timely manner.
IV. PROPOSED PROJECT
The proposal is to expand the definition of minor auto repair
to include the maintenance activities associated with modern
lube and tune facilities, and allow such facilities as an
independent use by conditional use permit in the C-C zone.
The requirement for a conditional use permit ensures that each
review would include analysis of the individual application to
verify that it is compatible with the proposed specific
location. Standard regulations in the code mitigate and
potential impacts.
The conditions set forth for Automotive Maintenance Facilities
in the project proposal, as evaluated in the Mitigated
Negative Declaration, IS-95-17, have been determined to not
require project mitigation. These standards are existing in
the zoning ordinance or may be incorporated in the Conditional
~-d-t/
Use Permit. on a project specific basis. Therefore, mitigation
measures as outlined in the Mitigated Negative Declaration no
longer apply.
V. :IDENT:IFICATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL BFFECTS
The code amendment itself will not result in significant
environmental impacts. Ensuing projects, however, may result
in one or more significant environmental impacts requiring
specific mitigating measures to be determined on a project by
project basis.
The following potential impacts could be associated with each
application for an automotive maintenance facility in the
various commercial zones, however, not necessarily significant
impacts: land use and planning, hazardous waste, and noise.
These issues will be reviewed on a case by case basis for each
Conditional Use Permit application.
Land Use and Planninq
Currently Automotive Maintenance facilities are not permitted
in the C-C zone. Therefore, the proposed use is not currently
compatible with the plans and zoning of the City. Compliance
with City plans would be achieved upon adoption of the
proposed ordinance. Therefore, the subject proposal does not
have a significant impact to land use and planning.
Water Oualitv/Hazardous Waste
There is the potential for hazardous materials used in
conjunction with a automotive maintenance facility to
contaminate the ground water supply if not stored and disposed
of properly. All automotive wastes generated from this use
(i. e . used automotive oil, etc.) shall be disposed of in
accordance with applicable State of California and Federal
laws. Through the CUP process individual sites that may be
more sensitive will be analyzed and additional conditions
could be applied as part of the CUP approval.
Noise
Some activities associated with automotive maintenance may
invol ve the use of power tools which in certain locations
might have the potential to result in a significant impact
from noise. Standard regulations in the code mitigate
potential impacts. In most cases this will reduce the noise
level to less than. significant. In those cases where
sensitive receptors are located near a specific site, the CUP
will address this issue and additional noise reduction
measures may be required.
~ '
~,~~
VI. CONCLUSION
The Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that the
project revision, as reflected in this Addendum (IS-95-17A);
does not raise important new issues about the proj ect' s
significant effects in the environment. No significant
impacts would result from these modifications to the project
as previously proposed. This addendum supplements the
previous Mitigated Negative Declaration prepared for the
project and concludes that the project proposal is no longer
subject to mitigation measures.
.
. ~A 0 ,,:J~
Environmental Re~w ~~~na(lr-' r
.
~~02i.
Mitigated Nega\.."e Declaratio
PROJECT NAME: .
Code Amendment to Allow Automotive Maintenance in the
CoB, C-C, C-V and CoT zones upon issuance of a Conditional
Use Permit and I-L zone as a matter of right.
LOCATION:
City Wide
PROJECT APPLICANT: Beono Lube 'n' Thnt:, Inc.
CASE NO.:
IS-95-17
A. Proiect Settin!!:
The proposed project consists of an amendment to the zoning code to permit
autom~tive maintenance in various commercial zones in the City.
B. Proiect Descriotion
The proposed amendment would permit automotive maintenance facilities in the
Central Business (C-B), Central Commercial (C-C), Visitor Commercial (C-V) and
Thoroughfare Commercial (C-T) zones upon issuance of a Conditional Use Permit
and Limited Industrial (I-L) zone as a matter of right. The intent of the proposed
code amendment is to provide automotive~aintenance services in a convenient
setting for consumers. The proposed code amendment is necessary to accommodate
changes in the operation of automotive service stations which for the most part no
longer provide' general automotive maintenance services. This has necessitated
consumers finding new outlets for automotive services that are convenient to other
commercial consumer uses in high visibility commercial zones.
C. Compatibility with Zonin, and. Plans
The subject of this environmental initial study is a Municipal Code Amendment
which would permit automotive maintenance facilities in a variety of commercial
zones with a Conditional Use Permit. The various commercial zones are intended
foster different types of commercial development which are intended to meet a full
array of consumer oriented businesses.
The Chula Vista Municipal Code states that permitted uses in the C-B zone are
"stores, shops and offices supplying commodities. or performing services for residents
of the city as a whole or the surrounding community.... The Municipal Code further
states that the purpose of the CoN zone is to provide for convenience shopping. The
C-C zone permits "personal service enterprises". The C- V is intended to provide for
the needs of tourists and travelers and includes specific provisions for the driving
tourist.
The proposed code amendment would be compatJble with the each one of the ~~" l
described above. According to the definition of automotive maintenance fa~~
.............~
~-=t::-=--=-
city of chula vllta planning d.partm.nt 01Y OF
.nvlronm.nta. r.vl.w ..ctlon CHUlA VISTA
_~ ~'~ol?
contained in the proposed code amendment, the proposed use is an establishment
engaged in providing automotive services generally required in the operation and
maintenance of automotive vehicles, for the convenience of the driving public. As
previously stated, the subject commercial zones all have provisions for providing
goods and services for the convenience of consumers.
The requirement for a conditional use permit ensures that each review would include
analysis of the individual application to verify that it compatible with the specific area
that it is proposed to locate in.
D. Compliance
1. FirelEMS
The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that fire and emergency medical
units must be able to respond throughout the City to calls within five minutes
in 75% of the cases and seven minutes in 95% of the cases. The ability of the
fire department to provide adequate service would be reviewed for the
specific location at the time a Conditional Use Permit would be considered.
Access and other fire safety issues would be analyzed on a case by case basis.
This will be analyzed as part of the specific request. The Department would
most likely be able to provide an adequate level of fire protection City wide.
2. Police
The Threshold/Standard Policy requires that police units be able to respond
to 84% of Priority 1 calls within seven minutes or less and maintain an
average response time to all Priority 1 calls of 4.5 minutes or less. Police
units must respond to 62% of Priority 2 calls within 7 minutes or less and
maintain an average response time to all Priority 2 calls of 7 minutes or less.
City wide, individual applications for automotive maintenance facilities would
be evaluated on a cases by case basis to ensure adequate response time for
the project The Department would most likely be able to provide an
adequate level of police protection City wide.
3. Traffic
The Threshold/Standard Policy requires that a Level of Service (LOS) "C" be
maintained at all intersections, with the exception that LOS "D" may occur at
signalized intersection for a period not to exceed a total of two hours per day.
City wide, projects would be evaluated on a case by case basis and would be
reviewed to ensure adequate response time for the project The Code
~ tc2g/
Amendment itself will not result in increased traffic. Specific requests would
be analyzed according to their location, access and projected number of trips
to be generated from the use. .
4. Park/Recreation
The Threshold/Standards Policy for Parks and Recreation is 3 acre/l,OOO
population. The proposed city wide project will most likely not impact
neighborhood parks. In most cases, payment of park fees would not be
required, however, in some areas of the City these fees would be required for
all development Fees would be determined based on the individual project.
5. Drainage
The Threshold/Standard Policy requires that water flows and volumes must
not exceed City engineering standards. Off site drainage facilities must be
adequate to serve the project. The City will review each future project on a
case by case basis, at the time the Conditional Use Permit is considered, to
determine the extent of impact. The Code Amendment itself will not result
in increased drainage.
6. Sewer
The Threshold/Standard Policy requires that sewage flows and volumes must
not exceed City engineering standards. Liquid waste generation from each
individual proposed project would be analyzed at the time the Conditional
Use Permit is considered to ensure adequate service. The Code Amendment
itself will not result in increased waste generation.
7. Water
The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that adequate water service be
available for proposed projects. The issue of adequate water service would
be considered as part of the Conditional Use Permit process. Provided
adequate water service is available to a specific proposed project site, and the
proposal complies with the current City policy of no net increase in water
consumption, it is unlikely there would be a significant impact to water
demand associated with these types of uses. The issue of adequate water
service would be considered as part of the Conditional Use Permit process.
E. Identification of Environmental Effects
The code amendment itself will not result in significant environmental impacts.
Ensuing projects, however, may result in one or more significant environmental
impacts requiring specific mitigating measures to be determined on a project by
project basis.
~ ;;.~'f
The following potential impacts could be associated with each application for an
automotive maintenance facility in the various commercial zones, however, not
necessarily significant impacts: land use and planning, hazardous waste, and noise.
These issues will be reviewed on a case by case basis for each Conditional Use
Permit application.
Land Use and Planning
Currently Automotive Maintenance facilities are not permitted in many of the.
commercial zones. Therefore, the proposed use is not currently companble with the
plans and zoning of the City. Compliance with City plans would be achieved upon
adoption of the proposed ordinance. Therefore, the subject proposal does not have
a significant impact to land use and planning.
Water OualitylHazardous Waste
There is the potential for hazardous materials used in conjunction with the
automotive maintenance facility to contaminate the ground water supply if not stored
and disposed of properly. Standard conditions of approval to. address this situation
have been included in the proposed ordinance. Adoption of the proposed ordinance
including these standards will mitigate any potential impact to less than significant.
Through the CUP process individual sites that may be more sensitive will be
analyzed and additional conditions could be applied as part of the CUP approval.
Noise
Some activities associated with automotive maintenance may involve the use of
power tools which in certain locations might have the potential to result in a
significant impact from noise. A standard condition has been included in the
ordinance which requires that all work be conducted within the building. In most
cases this will reduce the noise level to less than significant. In those cases where
sensitive receptors are located near a specific sight, the CUP will address this issue
and additional noise reduction measures may be required.
F. Consultation
1. Individuals and Or,anizations
City of Chula Vista:
Applicant's Agent: Marilyn R.F. Ponseggi, M.F. Ponseggi & Associates
2. Documents
Chula Vista General Plan (1989) and EIR (1989)
Title 19, Chula Vista Municipal Code
~ r:~J(}
3. Initial Studv
This environmental determination is based on the attached Initial Study, any
comments received on the Initial Study and any comments received during the
public review period for this Negative Declaration. The report reflects the
independent judgement of the City of Chula Vista. Further information
regarding the environmental review of this project is available from the Chula
Vista Planning Department, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910.
-r6~ftVJvrL~(:il
ENVIRO NT RE W ORDINATOR
(b:lIDeDd)
~;JJ
-~ j-;J;2
Mitigated NegaL"e Declaratio
PROJECT NAME:
Code Amendment to Allow Automotive Maintenance in the
CoB, C-C, C-V and CoT zones upon issuance of a Conditional
Use Permit and I-L zone as a matter of right.
LOCATION:
City Wide
PROJECT APPLICANT: Beono Lube 'n' Tune, Inc.
CASE NO.:
15-95-17
A. J>roiect Settinl!
The proposed project consists of an amendment to the zoning code to permit
automptive maintenance in various commercial zones in the City.
B. Proiect Description
The proposed amendment would permit automotive maintenance facilities in the
Central Business (C-B), Central Commercial (C-C), Visitor Commercial (C-Y) and
Thoroughfare Commercial (C-T) zones upon issuance of a Conditional Use Permit
and Limited Industrial (I-L) zone as a matter of right. The intent of the proposed
code amendment is to provide automotive. JPaintenance services in a convenient
setting for consumers. The proposed code amendment is necessary to accommodate
changes in the operation of automotive service stations which for the most part no
longer provide general automotive maintenance services. This has necessitated
consumers finding new outlets for automotive services that are convenient to other
commercial consumer uses in high visibility commercial zones.
C. Comoatibility with Zoning and, Plans
The subject of this environmental initial study is a Municipal Code Amendment
which would permit automotive maintenance facilities in a variety of commercial
zones with a Conditional Use Permit. The various commercial zones are intended
foster different types of commercial development which are intended to meet a full
array of consumer oriented businesses. .
The Chula Vista Municipal Code states that permitted uses in the CoB zone are
"stores, shops and offices supplying commodities.or performing services for residents
of the city as a whole or the surrounding community.... The Municipal Code further
states that the purpose of the CoN zone is to providefor convenience shopping. The
C-C zone permits .personal service enterprises.. The C- V is intended to provide for
the needs of tourists and travelers and includes specific provisions for the driving
tourist.
The proposed code amendment would be compatible with the each one of the z~n.,
described above. According to the definition of auttlll10tive maintenance fa~
~--~
city of chula villa planning department CI1Y Of
environmental review .ectlon CHULA VISTA
-~ ~"3;J
contained in the proposed code amendment, the proposed use is an establishment
engaged in providing automotive services generally required in the operation and
maintenance of automotive vehicles, for the convenience of the driving public. As
previously stated, the subject commercial zones all have provisions for providing
goods and services for the convenience of consumers.
The requirement for a conditional use permit ensures that each review would include
analysis of the individual application to verify that it compatible with the specific area
that it is proposed to locate in.
D. Compliance
1. FirelEMS
The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that fire and emergency medical
units must be able to respond throughout the City to calls within five minutes
in 75% of the cases and seven minutes in 95% of the cases. The ability of the
fire department to provide adequate service would be reviewed for the
specific location at the time a Conditional Use Permit would be considered.
Access and other fire safety issues would be analyzed on a case by case basis.
This will be analyzed as part of the specific request. The Department would
most likely be able to provide an adequate level of fire protection City wide.
2. Police
The Threshold/Standard Policy requires that police units be able to respond
to 84% of Priority 1 calls within seven minutes or less and maintain an
average response time to all Priority 1 cal1s of 4.5 minutes or less. Police
units must respond to 62% of Priority 2 calls within 7 minutes or less and
maintain an average response time to all Priority 2 calls of 7 minutes or less.
City wide, individual applications for automotive maintenance facilities would
be evaluated on a cases by case basis to ensure adequate response time for
the project. The Department would most likely be able to provide an
adequate level of police protection City wide.
3. Traffic
The ThresholdlStandard Policy requires that a Level of Service (WS) "C" be
maintained at all intersections, with the exception that LOS "D" may occur at
signalized intersection for a period not to exceed a total of two hours per day.
City wide, projects would be evaluated on a case by case basis and would be
reviewed to ensure adequate response time for the project. The Code
-~ ~~Jr
Amendment itself will not result in increased traffic. Specific requests would
be analyzed according to their location, access and projected number of trips
to be generated from the use.
4. Park/Recreation
The Threshold/Standards Policy for Parks and Recreation is 3 acre/l,OOO
population. The proposed city wide project will most likely not impact
neighborhood parks. In most cases, payment of park fees would not be
required, however, in some areas of the City these fees would be required for
all development. Fees would be determined based on the individual project.
5. Drainage
The Threshold/Standard Policy requires that water flows and volumes must
not exceed City engineering standards. Off site drainage facilities must be
adequate to serve the project. The City will review each future project on a
case by case basis, at the time the Conditional Use Permit is considered, to
determine the extent of impact. The Code Amendment itself will not result
in increased drainage.
6. Sewer
The Threshold/Standard Policy requires that sewage flows and volumes must
not exceed City engineering standards. liquid waste generation from each
individual proposed project would be analyzed at the time the Conditional
Use Permit is considered to ensure adequate service. The Code Amendment
itself will not result in increased waste generation.
7. Water
The Threshold/Standards Policy requires that adequate water service be
available for proposed projects. The issue of adequate water service would
be considered as part of the Conditional Use Permit process. Provided
adequate water service is available to a specific proposed project site, and the
proposal complies with the current City policy of no net increase in water
consumption. it is unlikely there would be a significant impact to water
demand associated with these types of uses. The issue of adequate water
service would be considered as part of the Conditional Use Permit process.
E. Jdentification of Environmental Effects
The code amendment itself will not result in significant environmental impacts.
Ensuing projects, however, may result in one or more significant environmental
impacts requiring specific mitigating measures to be determined on a project by
project basis.
~tt~S-
The following potential impacts could be associated with each application for an
automotive maintenance facility in the various commercial zones, however, not
necessarily significant impacts: land use and planning, hazardous waste, and noise.
These issues will be reviewed on a case by case basis for each Conditional Use
Permit application.
Land Use and Planning
Currently Automotive Maintenance facilities are not permitted in many of the
commercial zones. Therefore, the proposed use is not currently compatible with the
plans and zoning of the City. Compliance with City plans would be achieved upon
adoption of the proposed ordinance. Therefore, the subject proposal does not have
a significant impact to land use and planning.
Water Ouality/Hazardous Waste
There is the potential for hazardous materials used in conjunction with the
automotive maintenance facility to contaminate the ground water supply if not stored
and disposed of properly. Standard conditions of approval to address this situation
have been included in the proposed ordinance. Adoption of the proposed ordinance
including these standards will mitigate any potential impact to less than significant.
Through the CUP process individual sites that may be more sensitive will be
analyzed and additional conditions could be applied as part of the CUP approval.
Noise
Some activities associated with automotive maintenance may involve the use of
power tools which in certain locations might have the potential to result in a
significant impact from noise. A standard condition has been included in the
ordinance which requires that all work be conducted within the building. In most
cases this will reduce the noise level to less than significant. In those cases where
sensitive receptors are located near a specific sight, the CUP will address this issue
and additional noise reduction measures may be required.
F. Consultation
1. Individuals and Oll!:anizations
City of Chula Vista:
Applicant's Agent: Marilyn R.F. Ponseggi, M.F. Ponseggi & Associates
2. Documents
Chula Vista General Plan (1989) and EIR (1989)
Title 19, Chula Vista Municipal Code
___~~r-J~
3. Initial Studv
This environmental determination is based on the attached Initial Study, any
comments received on the Initial Study and any comments received during the
public review period for this Negative Declaration. The report reflects the
independent judgement of the City of Chula Vista. Further information
regarding the environmental review of this project is available from the Chula
Vista Planning Department, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910.
~~~V7vfL~&/
ENVIRO NT RE W ORDINATOR
(MInL.d)
-~
b~3?
~;?~
APPLICATION CANNOT Bl. CEPTED UNLESS SITE
PLA.'" IS FOLDED TO FIT INTO AN 8-1/2 X I I FOLDER
INITIAL STUDY
,
For Office Use Only
Case No. IS- tf.5. /7
'OpSL AInnt/1 /j'n/J, ~ t
Receipt No.
Date Rec'd. J..?-I3-W
Accepted by
Project No. FA-lAY'"
OpSL No. D0- 1'16
ClP No.
Related Case No.
-
City of Chula Vista
Application Form
A. BACKGROUND
1. Project Title AutO"lOtive "1aintenance Faciltv Code
2. Project Location (Street address or description) Ci tywide
Assessors Book. Page & Parcel No. N/A
3. Brief Project Description'I'le proooSM mnendrnent would permit ftutcmotive m!lin-
tenance facilities in various cor.T'lE!rcial zones with a CUP and in tl1e
I-L zone as a natter of right in order to ide these services in a
conven:!.en ::;e t~nq or conSUMers.
4. Name at Appl1cant 'P'rnnn TuhP In' '1'l1np Tn,.. (c::h~~n T.;Q1cDT)
Address 4911 Birch Street FaxIil51-2891(714lPhonl!714l 852-6696
City NeNlXlrt Beach State CI\. Zip 92660
S. Name of Preparer/Agent Marilyn R.F. Ponseqqi. M.F. Ponseqqi & Associates
Address 2117 Jarama Ct Fax# 444-8568 Phone 444-fl247
City E1 Cajon State CI\. Zip 92019
Relation to Applicant llgeT1t
6. Indicate all permits or approvals and enclosures or documents required by the Environmental
Review Coordinator.
a. Permits or approvals required.
General Plan Amendment
Rezone/Prezone
-
_ Grading Permit
_ Tentative Parcel Map
_ Site Plan & Arch. Review
_ Special Use Permit
_ Design Review Application
_ Tentative Subd. Map .
_ Redevelopment Agency OPA
_ Redevelopment Agency DDA
_ Public Project
Annexation
-
_ Specific Plan
Conditional Use Permit
-
_ Variance
_ Coastal Development
-1X. Other Permit
Code JIiI1eDne!.t
If project is a General Plan Amendment and/or rezone, please indica1e the chanse in designation from .
N/A to
b.
_ Grading Plan
_ Parcel Map
Precise Plan
= Specific Plan
_ Traffic Impact Report
_ Hazardous Waste Assessment
Enclosures or documents (as required by the Environmental Review Coordinator).
. Arch. Elevations Hydrological Study
- -..
Landscape Plans Biological Study
= Tentative Subd. Map = Archaeological Study
Jmprovemenl Plans Noise Assessment
= Soils Re~ = Olher Agency Permit
_ GeoteChnical Report ~ Olher
-~ ~-J1
..'PC:F:'HOMEII'\.A.,'lIlN0'S'J"0IWN011.....93 (Rei. 1010.93) (Rei. 1=9))
Pal" I
7. Indicate other applicallons for permits or approvals that are bell1g submitted at this time.
a. Permits or approvals required.
General Plan Amendment
Re~onelPre~one
= Grading Permit
_ Tentative Parcel Map
Site Plan & Arch. Review
= Special Use Permit
_ Design Review Application
_ Tentative Subd. Map
_ Redevelopment Agency OPA
_ Redevelopment Agency DDA
_ Public Project
Annexation
_ Specific Plan
_ Conditional Use Permit
Variance
_ Coastal Development
Other Permit
B. PROPOSED PROJECT
3. Complete this section if project is commercial or industrial or mixed use.
a. Type(s) of land use IVA
b. Floor area Height of structures(s)
c. Type of construction used in the structure
1.
a.
Land Area: square footage N/A or acreage
If land area to be dedicated. state acreage and purpose.
b. Does the project involve the construction of new buildings. or will existing structure be
utili~ed? N/A
2.
Complete this section if project is residential or mixed use. 1:l/A
a. Type of deveJopment:_ Single Family _ Two Fafriily _ Multi Family
Townhouse Condominium
b. Total number of structures
c. Maximum height of structures
d. Number of Units: I bedroom
2 bedroom
3 bedroom
4 bedroom
Total Units
e. Gross density (DU/total acres)
f. Net density (DU/total acres minus any dedication)
g. Estimated project population
h. Estimated sale or rental price range
i. Square footage of structure
j. Percent of lot coverage by buildings or structures
k. Number of on-site parking spaces to be provided
1. Percent of site in road and paved surface
--y tf;Ytl
1I>'PC:F:\IIOMEIPLAII!>"lNGIS1'OllIDI1021.....93 (Ref. 1071).93) (Re!. 1022.931
p.,e2
d. Describe maJur access points to the structures and the orientation to adjoining propenies
and streets
e. Number of on-site parking spaces provided
f. Estimated number of employees per shift
Number of shifts Total
g. Estimated number of customers (per day) and basis of estimate
h. Estimated number of deliveries per day
i. Estimated range of service area and basis of estimate
j. Type/extent of operations not in enclosed buildings
k. Hours of operation
1. Type of exterior lighting
4. If project is other than residential, commercial or industrial complete this section.
a. Type of project Code AI'lendment to Pen!li.t AutCllOOtive MIlint-,.,.",;-,,,,,
FacilitJ.es in various ccmnercial zones with a conditional use permit.
b. Type of facilities provided
c. Square feet of enclosed stnlctures
d. Height of structure(s) - maximum
e. Ultimate occupancy load of project
f. Number of on-site parking spaces to be provided
g. Square feet of road and paved surfaces
h. Additional project characteristics
C. PROJECT CHARACTERISTICS
I. WiD the project be required to obtain a permit through the Air Pollution Conuol District (APeD)'?
w/'A
- ~ ~ -y/
Paae3
1II1l(,F,IIlOME\PLA."'l-'lSGlSTOREI1.I021.A.93 (IlcI. 101ll.93) (IlcI. 1022.93)
2. Is an)' type of gra.. ,; or excavation of the propeny antjcip...~J?
If yes. complete the following:
a. Excluding trenches to be backfilled. how many cubic yards of earth will be excavated?
b. How many cubic yards of fill will be placed?
c. How much area (sq. ft. 'or acres) will be graded?
d. What will be the: Maximum depth of cut
Average depth of cut
Maximum depth of fill
Average depth of fill
3. Describe all energy consuming devices which are pan of the proposed project and the l)-pe of
energ)' used (air conditioning. electrical appliance. heating equipment. etc.)
Automotive power tools and diRgnostic tools
4. Indicate the amount of natural open space that is pan of the project (sq. ft. or acres)
N/A
S. If the project will result in any ~mployment opponunities describe the nature and type of these
jobs. Code Amendment could result in developnent of autarotive maintenance
which could result in additional ;obs within the City.
6. Will highly flammable or potentially explosive materials or substances be used or stored within
the project site? Yes, autarotive lubricants, used motor oil, etc.
7. How many estimated automobile trips. per day, will be generated by the project? kcordina to
the SANDAG Traffic Generator Manual. 20 ArYr Dl!r 1000 eauare feet.
8. Describe (if any) off-site improvements necessary to implement the project, and their points of
access or cOMection to the project site. Improvements include but nOllimited to the following:
new streets: street widening; extension of gas, electric, and sewer lines: cut and fill slopes; and
pedestrian and bicycle facilities. N/A
-y ~-~
"'1'C,F:~MEIPI.AIlNINClISTORElND21.".93 (1Ie1. 1020.93) (1Ie1. 1022.93)
Page 4
D. DESCRIPTION OF EN'vI..JNMENTAL SETIING
1. Geolo\!v
Has a geology study been conducted on the propeny? N/A
(If yes, please attach)
Has a soils repon on the project site been made?
(If yes, please attach)
2.
Hvdrolo\!V
Are any of the following features present on or adjacent to the site?
(If yes, explain in detail.)
a. Is there any surface evidence of a shallow ground water table?
N/A
b. Are there any watercourses or drainage improvements on or adjacent to the site?
c. Does runoff from the project site drain directly in to or toward a domestic water supply.
lake. reservoir or bay?
d. Could drainage from the site cause erosion or siltation to adjacent areas?
e. Describe all drainage facilities to be provided and their location.
3. ~
a. Are there any noise sources in the project vicinity which may impact the project site?
b. Will noise from the project impact any sensitive receptors (hospitals, schools, single-
family residences)? Possibly
4. Biolo\!v
a. Does the site involve any Coastal Sage Scrub vegetation? N/A
b. Is the project site in a natural or partially natural state? .., I~
c. If yes, has a biological survey been conducted on the property?
Yes No (Please attach a 'copy.)
d. Describe 811 trees and vegetation on the site. Indicate location. height, diameter, and
species of trees. and which (if any) will be removed by the project. .., h
-~ ~~L/J
....'l'C,f,IIlOMEII'I,.AA,.,1l<GISTOREINO~I.A.93 (Rd. 10lO.93) (Rd. 1021.93)
Paae 5
S. Pa~t Use of the Lana
a. Axe there any known historical or archeological resources located on or near the project
site? !l/A
b.
Axe there any known paleontological resources?
N/A
c. Have there been any hazardous materials disposed of or stored on or near the project site?
Possible hazardous naterials related to the proposed use.
d.
What was the land previously used for?
N/A
6. Current Land Use
a. Describe all structures and land uses currently existing on the project site. N /a
b. Describe all structures and land uses currently existing on adjacent propeny.
North
c South
East
West
7. Social
a. Axe there any residents on site? N/a If so, how many?
b. Axe there any current employment opponunities on site?
If so, how many and what type?
8. Please provide any other information which may assist in the evaluation of the proposed project.
N/'A
~ 6--/-/1
1lIPC:F:IIlOMEII'l.AA"'!NCl'STClRElN021.A.9) (Ref. 10211.9)) (Re!. 1022.9:1)
Pa,. 6
E. CERTIFlCA TION
I, as owner/owner in escrow.
Print name
or
I. consultant or ag7 a
~j,~.L?t/ ~ ~
lob""; '1""' 'Q It' 'Doo-w-.~-g'J;
Print nameM.F. Ponseggi '" Associates
HEREBY AFFIRM, that to the best of my belief. the statements and information herein contained are in all
respects ttue and correct and thai all known information concerning the project and its sening has been
included in this application for an Initial Study of possible environmental impaCt and any enclosures for
anachments thereto.
Ov.ner/Owner in Escrow Signature
or
~l~:Il?c~~.
Consultant or Agent Signature
November 18. 1994
Dale
.If acting for a corporation, include capacity and company name.
~ k~1/~
''PC;f;'HC)hlE'ILA.',.1N0'In0RElN021.....93 (Rd. tOlD.93) (Rd. IOU.93)
Pac" 7
Proposed Amendment to Chula Vista Municipal Code
to Accommodate Automotive Maintenance Uses
Add Section 19.58-023 . Automotive Maintenance Facility
"Automotive Maintenance Facility" means an establishment engaged in providing
automotive services generally required in the operation and maintenance of automotive
vehicles, for the convenience of the driving public. Such maintenance services are limited
to engine tune-up, replacement of plugs, brake replacement and drum turning, air
conditioning system servicing, smog testing, replacement of belts and hoses, fuel injection
system servicing, radiator flushes and all general lubricating services.
Add Section 19.32.030{N) (Central Business Zone)
19.32.030(N) - Automotive Maintenance as defined in Section 19.58.023 subject to the
provisions of Section 19.58.061.
Add Section 19.36.030(P) (Central Commercial)
19.32.030(P) - Automotive Maintenance as defined in Section 19.58.023 subject to the
provisions of Section 19.58.061.
Add Section 19.38.030(M) (Visitor Commercial)
19.38.030(M) . Automotive Maintenance as defined in Section 19.58.023 subject to
the provisions of Section 19.58.061.
Add Section 19.40.030(Y) (Thoroughfare Commercial)
19.40.030(Y) - Automotive Maintenance as defined in Section 19.58.023 subject to the
provisions of Section 19.58.061.
Add Section 19.44.020(R) (Umited Industrial)
19.44.020(R) - Automotive Maintenance as defined in Section 19.58.023 subject to the
provisions of Section 19.58.061.
~
-~
i -1/ ~
.
...
c.IlII.A . 1
....'
.
Add Section 19.58.061 Automotive Maintenance Facilities
Automotive Maintenance facilities shall be subject to the following standards in addition to
those which the Zoning Administrator shall determine for each individual request:
1. Automotive maintenance facilities shall be restricted to automotive maintenance only
such as would typically be found in an automotive sctvice station (reference Section
19.02.024).
2. Major auto repair including carburetor overhauling, rebuilding and reconditioning of
engines and collision repair including body frame, fender repair or automotive
painting shall be prohibited.
3. All work shall be conducted within a building.
4. Vehicles shall not be left outside of the building overnight.
S. All automotive wastes generated from this use (i.e. used automotive oil, etc.) shall be
disposed of in accordance with applicable State of Oaifornia and Federal laws.
5dl Dnft. ....... JO, 1,.,.
(IaINClUl\CXlIl
"
-y
~ -If?
... '!...
CWo'
...:
Case No~"" -~c:; - I '7
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
APPENDIX DI
CITY DATA SHEET
L
Current Zonin,i on lite: ~\'" - ~~~ '..s.Ci.~......t\'dp
Nonh __
. South ~
East ./
West ,,/
n.
Does the project confonn to the cumnt zoning? tJ I.~ - ~r'"" ~ ~ ''l:'N>_~Wic.
General Plan land use designation on lite: t.:\ \",. ~Al"l"'\ \!.<. ........ "'-~KIPfo\~~.:r'''i.lIC>.cc:d
North r- ~
South ...........-
East ...........-
West /'
-
Is the project compatible with the Genera1 Plan Land Use Diagram? ~ "
Is the project area designated for conservation or open spICe or Idjacent to III m!a 10 designated?
....,\... . ~~~ ....s tvn ",-<''''-(!II ~t"~~
. ,
Is the project located adjacent to lilY scenic: routes? -W \ll.
(If yes, describe the design 1eC:hniques being used to protect or eManCC the scenic: quality of the
route).
m. Schools
If the proposed project is residential, please complete the following: I\l I f\.
School
l1Dits
o..ratiDJ
FICtlln
'lV-II
Oeoerated
From Prolecl
Cabacitv
Enrollment
P...__1l!IaIll.1t
l'-wy
Junior Hip
SeaIor Hi&b
IV. Renwts:
.30
.29
.10
~J":/
Director of ianning or Repzesentative
~~
</.~I /q,~
Dale I
&-1r
~=t;I"".lmUJ)lIol.lcao.t;I)
"'1
Case No. 15-Q5./7
LANDSCAPE PLANNING
A. Does the project affect native plant communities?
If so. please identify which communities.
Will the project require native planting? (Please describe)
B. Please identify any important or highly visible hillsides on or Idjacent to the project.
What landscaping conditions (if any) will be required for these hillsides?
C. Of the total area to be developed. how much. and which areas are expected to be replanted
and require supplemental watering? (Please describe).
E. Are there any other landscape requirements or mitigation for the project?
~
/.s/?S-
City Landscape ArchiteCt or Representative
Date
- y ~-Jj/
P.,..
~O:zz."(IcI.I02I.,,)(W. IOlll.")
Case No. IS-95-17
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
1. Name of Proponent: Econo Lube 'n' Tune, Inc.
2.
Lead Agency Name and Address:
City of ChuJa Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
3. Address and Phone Number of Proponent: Econo Lube n' Tune, Inc. (Sherwin Lisker)
4911 Birch Street
Newport Beach, California 92660
(714) 852-6696
4.
Name of Proposal:
Amendment to the Municipal Code of the City of Chula Vista to permit
Automotive Maintenance Facilities in a variety of commercial zones with
a conditional use permit.
5.
Date of Checklist:
January 31, 1995
--
- -..... J.- ....
-..... u.o- -..... N.
"pod _od "pod ......
L LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the
proposal:
a) Conflict with general plan designation or 0 0 0 IBI
zoning?
b) Conflict with applicable environmental plans or 0 IBI 0 0
policies adopted by agencies with jurisdiction
over the project?
c) Affect agricultural resources or operations (e.g., 0 0 0 IBI
impacts to soils or farmlands, or impacts from
incompatible land uses)?
d) Disrupt or divide the physical arrangement of 0 0 0 IBI
an established community (including a low-
income or minority community)?
Comments: The proposed project is an amendment to the Municipal Code. Currently Automotive
Maintenance Facilities are not permitted in several of the commercial zones. Adoption of this Code
Amendment will permit these types of uses in certain commercial zones with a CUP. Adoption of the
Amendment will make the proposed use in compliance with the Municipal Code and therefore
mitigate any potential environmental impact to land use plan compatibility.
.-- ~ ??t/
(b,_okJ)
Pll8e J
.......
........, _....t '- ....
llpiflu.t v.... --. No
"po<t _'od ...... ...."
n POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the
proposal:
a) Cumulatively exceed official regional or local 0 0 0 IllI
population projections?
b) Induce substantial growth in an area either 0 0 0 IllI
directly or indirectly (e.g., through projects in
an undeveloped area or extension of major
infrastructure)?
c) Displace existing housing, especially affordable 0 0 0 IllI
housing?
Comments: The proposed project is a code amendment to pennit automotive maintenance facilities
in several commercial zones with a CUP. The proposed amendment will Dot affect housing or
population.
III. GEOPHYSICAL. Would the proposal result in or
expose people to potential impocts involving:
a) Unstable earth conditions or changes in 0 0 0 IllI
geologic substructures?
b) Disruptions, displacements, compaction or 0 0 0 IllI
overcovering of the soil?
c) Change in topography or ground surface relief 0 0 0 IllI
features?
d) The destruction, covering or modification of 0 0 0 IllI
any unique geologic or physical features?
e) Any increase in wind or water erosion of soils, 0 0 0 IllI
either on or off the site?
t) Changes in deposition or erosion of beach 0 0 0 IllI
sands, or changes in siltation, deposition or
erosion which may modify the channel of a
river or stream or the bed of the ocean or any
bay inlet or lake?
g) Exposure of people or property to geologic 0 0 0 IllI
hazards such as earthquakes, landslides, mud
slides, ground failure, or similar hazards?
Comments: The proposed project is a city wide code amendment. No. specific site is proposed as a
part of the code amendment. The proposed amendment will have no affect on geophysical conditions.
IV. WATER. Would the proposal result in:
a) Changes in absorption rates, drainage patterns, 0 0 0 IllI
or the rate and amount of surface runoff?
b) Exposure of people or property to water related 0 0 0 IllI
hazards such as flooding or tidal waves?
"- -~ ~-5/
(b:~tckJ) Page 2
--
.........,. -..... ... ....
-..... v_ -..... N.
.."", ......... .....' ......
c) Discharge into surface waters or other alteration 0 0 0 I!lI
of surface water quality (e.g., temperature,
dissolved oxygen or turbidity)?
d) Changes in the amount of surface water in any 0 0 0 I!lI
water body?
e) Changes in currents, or the course of direction 0 0 0 I!lI
of water movements, in either marine or fresh
waters?
f) Change in the quantity of ground waters, either 0 0 0 I!lI
through direct additions or withdrawals, or
through interception of an aquifer by cuts or
excavations?
g) Altered direction or rate of flow of 0 0 0 I!lI
groundwater?
h) Impacts to groundwater quality? 0 I!lI 0 0
i) Alterations to the course or flow of flood 0 0 0 I!lI
waters?
j) Substantial reduction in the amount of water 0 0 0 I!lI
otherwise available for public water supplies?
Comments: Automotive maintenance facilities provide a variety of automotive services including oil
changes, lubrication services, etc. There is the potential for the hazardous materials associated with
these services (used motor oil, etc.) to contaminate ground water if it is not stored and disposed of
properly. Conditions to address this situation have been included in the draft Code Amendment. If
adopted as proposed, these conditions would be imposed as standard conditions on every CUP for
Automotive Maintenance which would mitigate the potential impact to less than significant.
V. Am QUALITY. Would the proposal:
a) Violate any air quality standard or contribute to
an existing or projected air quality violation?
b) Expose sensitive receptors to pollutants?
o
o
o
I!lI
c) Alter air movement, moisture, or temperature,
or cause any change in climate, either locally or
regionally?
d) Create objectionable odors?
o
o
o
o
o
I!lI
I!lI
o
e) Create a substantial increase in stationary or
non-stationary sources of air emissions or the
deterioration of ambient air quality?
Comments: The proposed project is a city wide code amendment. No specific site is proposed as a
part of the code amendment. The proposed amendment will have no affect on air quality.
o
o
o
o
o
o
I!lI
I!lI
(b"lacanolAtcld)
-~ ~~~~
~
Page 3
hctodoD,
-, -..... '- ....
-","0' v.a.. -..... No
.po" -.. ..... ""CI
VI. TRANSPORTATION/CmCULATION. Would
the proposal result in:
a) Increased vehicle trips or traffic congestion? 0 0 0 mI
b) Hazards to safety from design features (e.g., 0 0 0 Ill!
sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or
incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)?
c) Inadequate emergency access or access to 0 0 0 Ill!
nearby uses?
d) Insufficient parking capacity on-site or off-site? 0 [] 0 mI
e) Hazards or barriers for pedestrians or bicyclists? 0 [] 0 mI
f) Conflicts with adopted policies supporting 0 [] 0 Ill!
alternative transportation (e.g. bus turnouts,
bicycle racks)?
g) Rail, waterborne or air traffic impacts? 0 0 0 Ill!
h) A "large project" under the Congestion 0 0 [] Ill!
Management Program? (An equivalent of 2400
or more average daily vehicle trips or 200 or
more peak-hour vehicle trips.)
CommeDts: The proposed project is a city wide code amendment. No specific site is proposed as a
part of the code amendment. The proposed use is estimated to generate approximately 20 ADT per
1,000 square foot of building. Each proposal will be evaluated on an individual basis during their
Conditional Use Permit process. At that time the ability of surrounding streets, to a specific proposed
site, to accommodate the proposed project would be evaluated. The proposed amendment will have
no affect on transportation/circulation.
VII. BIOWGICAL RESOURCES. Would the
proposal result in impacts to:
a) Endangered, sensitive species, species of 0 0 [] mI
concern or species that are candidates for
listing?
b) Locally designated species (e.g., heritage trees)? 0 [] [] mI
c) Locally designated natural communities (e.g, 0 0 0 Ill!
oak forest, coastal habitat, etc.)?
d) Wetland habitat (e.g., marsh, riparian and vernal [] 0 [] mI
pool)?
e) Wildlife dispersal or migration corridors? 0 [] 0 mI
f) Affect regional habitat preservation planning 0 [] 0 Ill!
efforts?
~ t/-5J
(b:'*=anolhcltl) Plllle4
--
....-.
......
--
-.....
v_
-
J.- ....
-.....
......
No
......
Comments: The proposed project is a city wide code amendment. No specific site is proposed as a
part of the code amendment. The proposed amendment will have no affect on biological resources.
vm. ENERGY AND MINERAL RESOURCES.
Would the proposal:
a) Conflict with adopted energy conservation 0 0 0 1m
plans?
b) Use non-renewable resources in a wasteful and 0 0 0 1m
inefficient manner?
c) If the site is designated for mineral resource 0 0 0 1m
protection, will this project impact this
protection?
Comments: The proposed project is a city wide code amendment. No specific site is proposed as a
part of the code amendment. The proposed amendment will have no affect on energy and mineral
resources.
a) A risk of accidental explosion or release of
hazardous substances (including, but not limited
to: petroleum products, pesticides, chemicals or
radiation)?
b) Possible interference with an emergency
response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
c) The creation of any health hazard or potential
health hazard?
d) Exposure of people to existing sources of
potential health hazards?
e) Increased fire hazard in areas with flammable
brush, grass, or trees?
Comments: As discussed under Air Quality, there is a potential for hazardous material to enter
ground water if not stored and disposed of correctly. The use proposed in the code amendment would
not have potential hazardous materials impacts beyond those already discussed. Per Section 14.20.120
of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, automotive maintenance facilities must incorporate storm water
pollution prevention measures into their hazardous materials response plan, which is required by
Chapter 6.95 of the California Health &. Safety Code.
IX. HAZARDS. Would the proposal involve:
X. NOISE. Would the proposal result in:
a) Increases in existing noise levels?
b) Exposure of people to severe noise levels?
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
1m
1m
~ ~ ~S-~
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
1m
1m
1m
1m
1m
o
o
(b:\K:ranoihcld)
Poge5
-
__,
.."'"
........,
__,
u_
.........
I.- ....
__,
.."'"
N.
.."'"
Comments: There is a potential for these types of facilities to create noise impacts for sensitive
receptors. Impacts would be assessed for each individual site at the time of the Conditional Use
Permit consideration. Conditions to address this potential impact have been included in the draft Code
Amendment. If adopted as proposed, these conditions would be imposed as standard conditions on
every CUP for Automotive Maintenance. These conditions would mitigate the potential impact to less
than significant.
XI. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the proposal have
an effect upon, or result in a need for new or
altered government services in any of the following
areas:
a) Fire protection? 0 0 0 I!lI
b) Police protection? 0 0 0 I!lI
c) Schools? 0 0 0 I!lI
d) Maintenance of public facilities, including 0 0 0 I!lI
roads?
e) Other governmental services? 0 0 0 I!lI
Comments: The proposed project is a city wide code amendment. No specific site is proposed as a
part of the code amendment. The proposed amendment will have no affect on energy IIlld mineral
resources.
XII. Tbresbolds. Will the proposal adversely impact the
City's Threshold Standards?
o
o
o
I!lI
As described below, the proposed project does not adversely impact IIllY of the seen Threshold
Standards.
a) FirelEMS
o
o
o
I!lI
The Threshold Standards requires that fire IIlld medical units must be lIble to respond to
calls within 7 minutes or less in 85% of the cases IIlld within 5 minutes or less in 75% of
the cases. The City of Chula Vista has indicated that this threshold standard will be met,
since the nearest fire station is ..nlL. miles away IIlld would be associated with a JJ!A..-
minute response time. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard.
Comments: See attached Negative Declaration
b) Police
o
o
o
I!lI
The Threshold Standards require that police units must 1I'spond to 84% of Priority I calls
within 7 minutes or less IIlld maintain IIll average response time to all Priority I calls of
4.5 minutes or less. Police '\DIits must respond to 62.10% of Priority 2 calls within 7
minutes or less and maintain an average response time to all Priority 2 calls of 7 minutes
or less. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard.
Comments: See attached Negative Declaration
~ tf ~f'
(0,_""",,) Pose 6
--
.........
.....,
hi"'"
.........
v_
-....
'- ....
.........
..-
No
...."
c) Traffic
o
o
o
I!lI
The Threshold Standards require that all intersections must operate at a Level of Service
(LOS) "COO or better, with the exception that Level of Service (LOS) "D" may occur
during the peak two hours of the day at signalized intersections. Intersections west of
1-805 are not to operate at a LOS below their 1987 LOS. No intersection may reach LOS
"E" or "F" during the average weekday peak hour. Intersections of arterials with freeway
ramps are exempted from this Standard. The proposed project will comply with this
Threshold Standard.
Comments: See attached Negative Declaration
d) ParkslRecreation
o
o
o
I!lI
The Threshold Standard for Parks and Recreation is 3 acres/I,ooo population. The
proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard.
Comments: See attached Negative Declaration
e) Drainage
o
o
o
I!lI
The Threshold Standards require that storm water flows and volumes not exceed
City Engineering Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary
improvements consistent with the Drainage Master Plan(s) and City Engineering
Standards. The proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard.
Comments: See attached Negative Declaration
f) Sewer
o
o
o
I!lI
The Threshold Standards require that sewage flows and volumes not exceed City
Engineering Standards. Individual projects will provide necessary improvements
consistent with Sewer Master Plan(s) and City Engineering Standards. The
proposed project will comply with this Threshold Standard.
Comments: See attached Negative Declaration
g) Water
o
o
o
I!lI
The Threshold Standards require that adequate storage, treatment, and transmission
facilities are constructed concurrently with planrted growth and that water quality
standards are not jeopardized during growth and construction. The proposed project will
comply with this Threshold Standard.
Applicants may also be required to participate in whatever water conservation or fee off-
set program the City of Chula Vista has in effect at the time of building permit issuance.
Comments: See attached Negative Declaration
~t~~
(b.wconoW.:tckl)
Page?
xm. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would
the proposal result in a need for new systems. or
substantial alterations to the following utilities:
a) Power or natural gas?
b) Communications systems?
c) Local or regional water treatment or distribution
facilities?
d) Sewer or septic tanks?
e) Stonn water drainage?
f) Solid waste disposal?
...-
...."""1
......
o
o
o
o
o
o
........"1
_"""I
\IoIou
.......
o
o
o
o
o
o
... ....
...."""1
..-
o
o
o
o
o
o
No
..-
IllI
IllI
IllI
IllI
IllI
IllI
Comments: The proposed project is a city wide code amendment. No specific site is proposed as a
part of the code amendment. The proposed amendment will have no affect on utilities and service
systems in the City.
XIV. AESTHETICS. Would the proposal:
a) Obstruct any scenic vista or view open to the
public or will the proposal result in the creation
of an aesthetically offensive site open to public
view?
b) Cause the destruction or modification of a
scenic route?
c) Have a demonstrable negative aesthetic effect?
d) Create added light or glare sources that could
increase the level of sky glow in an area or
cause this project to fail to comply with Section
19.66.100 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code,
Title 19?
e) Reduce an additional amount of spill light?
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
IllI
IllI
IllI
IllI
IllI
Comments: The proposed project is a city wide code amendment. No specific site is proposed as a
pari of the code amendment. The proposed amendment will have no affect on views or other
aesthetic considerations in the City.
XV. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the proposal:
a) Will the proposal result in the alteration of or
the destruction or a prehistoric or historic
archaeological site?
b) Will the proposal result in adverse physical or
aesthetic effects to a prehistoric or historic
building, structure or object?
o
D..
o
o
-~ ~-~/
- ~
(b:Wconol.t1ckl)
o
o
IllI
IllI
Pll8eB
--
......., -...., ... ....
-...., u_ -...., N.
..""" _led ..""" .."""
c) Does the proposal have the potential to cause a 0 0 0 I!lI
physical change which would affect unique
ethnic cultural values?
d) Will the proposal restrict existing religious or 0 0 0 I!lI
sacred uses within the potential impact area?
e) Is the area identified on the City's General Plan 0 0 0 I!lI
EIR as an area of high potential for
archeological resources?
Comments: The proposed project is a city wide code amendment. No specific site is proposed as a
part of the code amendment. The proposed amendment will have no affect on cultural resources.
XVL PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Will the
proposal result in the alteration of or the
destrut:tion of paleontological resources?
Comments: The proposed project is a city wide code amendment. No specific site is proposed as a
part of the code amendment. The proposed amendment will have no affect on paleontological
resources.
o
o
o
I!lI
XVII. RECREATION. Would the propasal:
a) Increase the demand for neighborhood or 0 0 0 I!lI
regional parks or other recreational facilities?
b) Affect existing recreational opportunities? 0 0 0 I!lI
c) Interfere with recreation parks & recreation 0 0 0 I!lI
plans or programs?
Comments: The proposed project is a city wide code amendment. No specific site is proposed as a
part of the code amendment. The proposed amendment will have no affect on recreation.
XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF
SIGNIFICANCE: See Negative Declaration for
mandatory findings of significam:e. If an EIR is
needed. this section should be completed.
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade
the quality of the environment, substantially
reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species,
cause a fish or wildlife population to drop
below self-sustaining levels, threaten to
eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce
the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate
important examples of the major periods or
California history or prehistory?
o
o
.0
I!lI
(b:\econoiA;LckI)
~ cf~5Y
Pag09
--
........,
"pod
_...~
-.....
u....
.........
... ....
.........
"pod
N.
.."",
Comments: The proposed project, an amendment to the Amendment Code, does not have the
potentiai to degrade the quality of the environment, reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species or
cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self sustaining levels.
b) Does the project have the potential to achieve
short-term, to the disadvantage of long-term,
environmental goals?
Comments: The project is in compliance with the intent of the commercial zones to provide
consumer services in a convenient manner. The proposed code amendment does call for these uses to
be subject to a Conditional Use Permit in order to review them on a cases by case basis. The
conditional use permit process does caB for certain findings to be made which will ensure that specific
use requests are compatible with surrounding uses.
o
o
o
1m
c) Does the project have impacts that are ODD Ill!
individually limited, but cumulatively
considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable"
means that the incremental effects of a project
are considerable when viewed in connection
with the effects of past projects, the effects of
other current projects, and the effects of
probable future projects.)
Comments: The environmental analysis determined that all potential impacts may be mitigated to
below a level of significance and there are no impacts which are individually limited but cumulatively
considerable.
d) Does the project have environmental effect
which will cause substantial adverse effects on
human beings, either directly or indirectly?
Comments: The project does not have the potential to cause substantial adverse effects on human
beings.
D
D
D
Ill!
-~-
~'~f/
(b:*'onolAtckJ)
PI&" 10
ENVIRONMENTAL FACl'ORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least
one impact that is a "Potentially Significant Impact" or "Potentially Significant Unless Mitigated," as
indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
III Land Use and Planning
o Population and Housing
o Geophysical
o TransponationlCirculation
o Biological Resources
o Energy and Mineral Resources
o Hazards
o Public Services
o Utilities and Service Systems
o Aesthetics
o Cultura1 Resources
o Recreation
III Water
o Air Quality
III Noise
o Mandatory Findings of Significance
DETERMINATION:
On the hasis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and 0
a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will he prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, III
there will not he a significant effect in this case because the mitigation measures described on an
attacbed sheet have heen added to the project. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION
will he prepared.
I fmd that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an 0
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect(s) on the environment, but at least D
one effect: I) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal
standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as
described on attacbed sheets, if the effect is a .potentially significant impacts. or .potentially
significant unless mitigated.. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it
must analyze only the effects that remain to he addressed.
'd? ~/JL'1 ('-IrA"/) 'f"~J )
Signature ./
11.~t! q5
Date' ,
Environmental Review Coordinator
City of Chula Vista
~ "---j,0
(b,_,dd) Pogo II
ROUTING FORM
DATE: December 29, 1994
~~r;J\
F~
~.n Larson, SU.f.lcUng ~ Boud.ng
John Lippitt, Engin.ering (EIR only)
Cl1~~ SWanson, Engin.ering (EIR only)
Bal Ros.nberg, Engin.ering (EIR only)
Roger Daoust, Engineering (IS/3, EIR/2)
Ricbard Rudol~, .\Sst City Attorney (Dran "eg Dec ~ EIR)
Carol Gove, Fir. Department
Harty Schmidt, Parks ~ R.creation
Crime Prevention, Police Depare..nt (Capt. .oll)
Community Development, R.d.v. .conomic Dev. only
CUrrent Planning
Duane Bazzel, Advanc. Planning
Bob Sennett, City Landscape Arcbitect
Bob Leiter, Planning Director
Chula Vista El.mentary School District, ~at. Shurson
Sweet",ater Union B.S. District, !'om Silva (IS ~ EIR)
Haureen Roeber, Library (Final EIR) . .
LAFCO (IS/Dra~t EIR - If annexation J.s J.nvolved) .
Hartin Hiller, Project !'racking Log (rout. rorm only)
Other .
Doue Reid
.l:nvironmental S.ction
SUBJEC'1': Appl1cation ror Initial Study (IS- 95-17 /FA- 666 IDQ 145 )
Cbeckprint Dra~t EIR (20 days) (EIR- IFB- /DQ )
Revie", o~ a Dran EIR (EIR- IFB- IDP )
Revie", o~ Environmental R.vi.", Record (FC- .l:RR- )
Revie", o~ Dran Neg Dee (IS- /FA- IDQ- )
!'be Project consists o~: A zone text amendment to pennie automotive
maintenance facilities as a conditional use
use is the C-B. C-S. C-V and C-T zones and
as a pennitted use in the I-L zone.
Location: City Wide
Pl.... r.vi.", th. docu_nt and ronrerd to ..' any ClOaIIents you IJev.
by, 1/17/95. . .. .
L"\<"<'''''J -
lJ<.w . )
. oYJ-t z........:...f.v
. . - I. '1.0 . , S--
. -~- ?'~/
comments:
YS-'I'I
ROUTING FORM
. "
, ,
"
, .- :.-~. ;.,
.:n./J~'{ 1'- J 1~5'
DATE: - . -.
IL."- r~r: -, I J!}
1~-;,i'1 l,..~.:.' ;...;-;
30'26
f'1ZD'" : 'J'tf':
~.n Larson, Building ~ Bousing
John Lippitt, Zngin..r1ng (ZIR only)
Cl1~~ SWanson, Zngin..r1ng (EIR only)
Bal Ros.nb.rg, Zngin..ring (EIR only)
Ik>g.r Daoust, Zngin..rJ.ng (IS/3, ZIR/2)
Richard Rudol~, Aut City Attorn.y (Dran N.g Dec ~ ZIR)
Carol Gove, Fir. Departm.nt
Harty Schmidt, Parks ~ R.cr.ation
Cr1me pr.v.nUon, 1'o11ce DepartJD.nt (Capt. Soll)
C01lJ1lJunity Dev.lopm.nt, R.dev. ZconoJD1c Dev. only
CUrr.nt Planning
Duan. Bazzel, Advance Planning
Bob Sennett, City Landscape Archit.ct
Bob Lei ter, Planning Director
Chula Vista El.mentary School District, ~at. Shurson
SWe.t...ater Union B.S. District, "om Silva (IS ~ EIR)
Haureen Roeber, Library (Final EIR) , .
LAFCO (IS/Dratt EIR - I~ annexation is involv.d)
Hartin Hiller, Project "racking Log (rout. ~or.m only)
Other
../4NJ.
,p ;~r-
....~
l.)
. ~'~/t";".
....,..,..;
. '",
7l> : .6JiISfM:
Doue Reid
~vJ.ronment,.l S.ction
SUB.7ECT: Appl1cation ~or Initial Study (IS- 95-17 IFA- 666 IDQ 145 J
Checkprint Dratt EIR (20 days) (EIR- /FB- IDQ J
R.vi.... o~ ,. Dratt ZIR (ZIR- IFB- IDP J
R.vi.... o~ Znvironm.ntal R.vi.... R.cord (I'C- .RR- J
Revi.... o~ Dratt N.g Dec (IS- II'A- IDQ- J
"he proj.ct consists ot: A zone text amendment to pennft automotive
maintenance facilities as a conditional use
use is the C-B, C-S, C-V and C-T zones and
as a pennitted use in the I-L zone.
Location: City Wide
:
Pl.... revi.... the document and ~ortfercf = ..'any ClOoDeI1" you bev.
by: 1/17/95. .
C01lJ1lJ.nts: 6> Pf742. Sei-notJ Ilf.2t>./"U OF- mE C#VC"I. V1<;r.{ MVIo/I&.lAAc.. e:o'~,
A~-rt ve 1>4~1^'T'&J'-HGe ~''-I-n~S IoA.vS'r '1J"~TrE ~ ~ rJi'L. ffW-VTTe,J
PUY~e:a.J Mtf...~.p~ tl/TT> ~tl!.. I#A~ ~~ ~""-S& 'Pu,J. ~ WI#1&.#of 'S
J!4?Vfu-o f# c.lfrl,p,-u: ~.~s OF ~ Co4t.'''i:CIJIJIr ~T)f NCb~Fe:7Y r~ '.~ZMl"
lleD,~." ,~ ,.-r/IJG4.ut>&.A .c~~ If~ ~ . 'AlG
'~~~cA.-~,-. ,'I'"J-/'rs'
CHULA VISTA POLICE DEPARTMERT
CRIME PREVERTIOR VRIT
PLAN REVIEW RECOMMENDATIONS
f'>-.
DATE:
TO:
VIA:
FROM:
nl.Ct \" U'\. d- I \ I q q s:
~~ R~d, c~\il~~_lrtAR21798S
fY\~. (JL~JJ.~~ Sc.,PS <.........-
Initial Study 95"- 17 &urn. a;(, t.J:?~J Ju.11.1.....-
PROJECT:
~ The Police Department and the Crime Prevention Unit will be
able to provide an adequate level of service for this
proposed site.
~ There is no expected increase in personnel or equipment in
---- order to maintain Police Department services.
Please forward additional information regarding this project
---- to the Crime Prevention Unit.
Estimated response times for Priority 1 calls to this project:
4-', :3 2 'I + d ( ~ -q S)
Estimated response times for Priority 2 calls to this project:
(:J '. cJO 'lId G.:)-qs-j
;L2 Conunents: . cf}f) r=.,>.{)--e..Y},\1' A'\ ! s d '-k0t .j'-<.'}
I &1~;' ~tj ~'y~, .;.; I~~~ .~~~ ~~i~~~ ~
I ., t, "
-1)-" ~-V' V I ~~1 ) '-C. f:::-s.-J '
cc:
Brookover, SCA
CPTED Rout;ng for.
PD/cpAJ 06/93
-~-~-?3
.;HULA VISTA POLICE DEPAR..JIENT
CRIME PREVENTION UNIT
PLAN REVIEW RECOMMENDATIONS
l h
DATE: 1wWlt~ 'H, (tf'lr
TO: Vn.<%/~'J &rtl;rttYI~111
VIA: ~t ~: ~7\./bill'$/&-NoY"~
FROM: Yl\(j~..l-Eb I :>CLP S
PROJECT: ::I::.e '15-17 t:o...o-.--o L..J..e. ~'I;;.f..L...
--
r-,_.
_. -.,
2
,
l
~ The Crime Prevention Unit does not have any comments regarding this project at this time.
-
.
Information on the project, or within the plans, does not provide enough detail to permit
crime prevention analysis.
-
Please forward the following information to the Crime Prevention Unit when available.
Elevations
Floor Plans
Landscape and Lighting Plans
Site Development Plans
Comments: ~'L,t:-w~ ~ ~.:r~ crl- \Yt...U. ~
.~'t:j ~^~ (~I.P ~ ,,"l~
n ~, .t= h, 6"' IA) .
'(..11\ ~ A~J"'~'~7--/''''''
~ ~ AE"': r; I ~.Q... yp'p AJP
. 0 .
.
1'vLnAA\~~c?AA. P..l
~tnA bAH
~ 61'"lI.--t ().. (' ~ /1.oul
-7;")
cc: Brookover, SCA
CP'lED Routi., Form
PO/opu 06193
~ r:~6Y
ROUTING FORM
DATE: December 29, 1994
2'0: ~.n Larson, Bul1cUng , Bouslng
John Lippitt, Engineering (EIR only)
CHtt SWanson, Engln.erIng (EIR only)
Bal Ros.nberg, Engln..rlng (EIR only)
Roger Daoust, EngIneerIng (IS/3, EIR/2)
Richard Rudolt, Aut Clty Attorn.y (Dratt N.g Dee 41 EIR)
Carol Gove, Fire Department
Harty Schmidt, Parks 41 R.cr.atIon
Crime Prevention, PoHc. Department (Capt. .oll)
COJIIJDunlty Development, R.d.v. EconomIc Dev. only
CUrrent PlannIng
Duane Ba...l, Advanc. Planning
Bob Sennett, City Landscape Archlt.ct
Bob Leiter, PlannIng Dir.ctor
Chula Vista Elementary school District, ~at. Shurson
sweet...ater Union B.S. District, !'om Silva (IS' EIR)
Haureen Roeber, Library (Final EIR) . ,
LAFCO (IS/Dratt EIR - It anne1(ation is .1nvolv.d)
Hartin HIller, proj.ct !'racking Log (rout. torm only)
Other
FROH:
Doue Reid
Bnv.1ronment.l S.ction
SUBJECT: AppHcation tor InitIal Study (IS- 95-17 IFA- 666 IDQ 145 J
Checkprint Dratt EIR (20 days) (EIR- /FB- IDQ J
Revl.... ot a Dratt EIR (EIR- IFB- IDP J
Revle... ot EnvIronmental Revi.... R.cord (FC- BM- J
Revl.... ot Dratt N.g Dee (IS- IFA- IDQ- J
:rhe Project consists ot: A zone text amendment to pennit automotive
maintenance facilities as a conditional use
use is the C-8, C-$~ C-V and C-1 zones and
as a pennitted use in the I-L zone.
:
LocatIon: City Wide
Pl.... r.vi.... th. document and torward to _' any COIIIIena you IuIv.
by 1/17/95. ' ..
COJIIJDents: ~ ,l. '''1.# -.;l'~~~ - {
'~
~~~~
ROln'ING FORM
DATE: December 29, 1994
Y:
~
1V
fI'6M :
K.n Larson, Building ~ Housing
Jobn Lippitt, Zngin..ring (ZIR only)
Clirr Swanson, Zngin..ring (EIR only)
Bal Rosenberg, Zngineering (EIR only)
Roger Daoust, Engin.ering (IS/3, ZIR/2)
Ricbard Rudolr, Asst City Attorn.y (Drart Il.g Dee ~ ZIR)
Carol Gove, Fire Department
Harty Schmidt, Parks ~ R.cr.ation
Crime pr.v.ntion, l'o11ce Departm.nt (Capt. .011)
Community Dev.loplll.nt, Bed.v. Zconomic Dev. '.onl}'b
CUrrent Planning
Duane Ban.l, Advanc. Planning \~~~
Bob Sennett, City Landscape Arcbit.ct
Bob Leiter, Planning Director .."--
Cbula Vista EI.mentary Scbool District, Kate Sburson
Sweet...ater Union B.S. District, 2'om Silva (IS ~ EIR)
Haureen Roeber, Library (Final EIR) '.
LAFCO (IS/Drart EIR - Ir annexation is involv.d)
Hartin Hiller, Project 2'racking Log (rout. rorm only)
Other
Doua Reid
Bnvironmental S.ction
SUBJEC2': App11cation ror Initial Study (IS- 95-17 IFA- 666 IDQ 145 J
,
Cbeckprint Draft EIR (20 days) (EIR- IFB- IDQ J
R.vi.... or a Draft ZIR (EIR- IFB-_/DP J
R.vi.... or Environmental R.vi.... R.cord (FC- BRR- J
Revi.... of Draft N.g Dee (IS- IFA- IDQ- J
2'be proj.ct consists of: A zone text amendment to pennit automotive
maintenance facilities as a conditional use
use is the C-B, C-S, C-V and C-T zones and
as a pennitted use in the I-L zone.
Location: City Wide
:
Pl.as. revi.... th. document and rorward to ..: any ClOaII8nts you !aav.
by 1/17/95 . ..
Comm.nts: tJ' ~~
~ tt~d-~
ROUTING FORM
DATE: December 29. 1994
2'0: Xen Larson, BuHding ~ Housing
170M Lippitt, Zngin.ering (ZIR only)
Clirr SWanson, zngineering (EIR only)
Bal Rosenberg, Engineering (EIR only)
Roger Daoust, Engineering (IS/3, EIR/2)
Richard Rudolr, Asst City Attorney (Drart Neg Dec ~ EIR)
Carol Gave, Fire Department
Marty Schmidt, Parks ~ Recreation
Crime Prevention, Polic. Depa,raent (Capt. SolI)
COJDl/lunity Development, R.dev. Economic Dev. only
CUrrent Planning
Duane Bazzel, Advance Planning
Bob Sennett, City Landscape Archit.ct
Bob Leiter, Planning Director
Chula Vista Elementary Scllool District, Xate Sllurson
SWeetwater Union B.S. District, !rom SHva (IS ~ EIR)
Maureen Roeber, Library (Final EIR) .
LAFCO (IS{Drart EIR - Ir anneX'ation is involved)
Martin Miller, Project !l'racking Log (rout. rorm only)
Otller
FROM:
Doua Reid
B'nvironmentel S.ction
SUBJECT: Application ror Initial Study (IS- 95-17 /FA- 666 IDQ 145 )
Clleckprint Dratt EIR (20 days) (EIR- IFB- IDQ )
Review or a Drart EIR (EIR- IFB- IDP J
Review ot Environmental R.vi.w R.cord (FC- B'RR- J
Review or Drart N.g Dec (IS- IFA- IDQ- J
!l'h. proj.ct consists or: A zone text amendment to pennit automotive
maintenance facilities as a conditional use
use is the C-B, C-S, C-V and C-T zones and
as a pennitted use in the I-L zone.
..
Loc.tion: City Wide
Pl.... revi.w th. document end ronrard to _ eny ClOlIlNnt. you av.
by 1/17/95 . ~
Comments:
~
y~5
-~~
d-eJ, ?
-~~~
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
.
-~L-.:::::'
~ ~-~ J
11-lE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
. You are required to Ole M Statement of Di~closure of cenain ownership or financial interests, payments, or campaign
Ctlnlri~uli"ns. un all mailer. which will require discretionary aClion on the pan of the City Council, Planning Commission, and
all other orneial bodies. The folluwing information must be disclosed:
1. List the names of all persllns having a financial interest in the property which Is the subject of the application or the
contract, e.g., owner,applicant, contractor, slibcontraclor, material supplier.
Bnh rAhan
Econo Lube 'N' Tune
2. Ifanyperson" Identified pursuant to (I) above isa corporation or partnership,list the names of all Individuals owning
more than 10%. of the sharc.\ in thc Ctlrporation ur owning any partnership interest in the partnership.
Robert Overdevest
Tim O'Brien
Fred Waechter
). If any person" idcntified pur~uant to (\) above is non-profit organiution or a trust, list the names of any person
"Mng as director of the non-pronl organiulIion or as trustcc or benenciary or trustor of the trust.
N/A
4_ Have you had more than S250 worth of busines~ transacted with any member of the City staff, Boards, Commissions,
Commillccs, and Council within Ihe past twelve months? Yes_ No..JL If yes, please indicate person(s):
S. Please identify each and every person, Including any agents, employees, consultants. or independent contractors who
you have assigned to represent you before Ihe City in this mailer.
Me,rilvn Ponl=ip-nn:i
'Rnh C"JIl'h:alln
Sherwin LisKer
MarK Haines
'Ann C;'r11nnnw
Wr=II1't WAanPT
6. Have you and/Or your orncers or agenll,ln the auregate, contributed more Ihan $1,000 10 a Councilmember In the
currenl or prc.ceding elecUon period? Ycs_ NO-L If yes, stale which Councllmember(s):
· · · (NOTE: Altadl addltlollll pages. ......
j ) .
Ignature of contraClor!a plicanl
J
FOR ECONO LUBE "N" TUNE
M~DTTVM ~ ~ nQ~ir~~I
Print or type name of contraClor!applicanl
Date: !=t-.ntpmhp1'" ,q. 1QQ.1
. O!:!!!!! iI *ftI~4 AI, "AII)I inlIMtIu.l, fi"... .o.,.,.-ip. joiN _, -..... _w..... frM!"'..1 "".,.u.ri.... ...."."...... - _......,,,.u/it....
... _"'_1)1_ 'OUIII)I. .iIy _"""""Iry, .il)l ",..,,;til"'/il)l, _t~ '" "'^. poIiritw ".u;.Uion, '" MY - ~p '" ...........011 atlirtf AI · wIlL'
~--?tJ-~
PROJECT LOCATOR AND PLANS
FOR 30TH & EDGEMERE
- ~ c:.-?/
TInS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
,
~~ d,~?~ '
Jt'.LI't'., '.~I
. - ~, rl
tOTH STREET
CI"Y
" I
~-~~
-
-
t~ ..:~l~
~...t
'"
IlOUSPAL[
I~l l~1
, .
r Nil", "I
o
~
.\~.
.
.....100 ...... &.
,.........a.
. ..
..
&4
'v
. .
,
LOCA TCIa - -
CHULA VISTA 'LANNINC DEPARTMENT
-..CTDUCIlIPnON,
_ ... . I'~ . A.....
...... 1M A_..,
.... --
J" · ~. 'cc.~.U A
IS '5-1' .
- y- &-;:y
(!)
_T.
-
uat: t. autnlCl . ..11'.1 .. I' oak
.,...11.& - ,. - III 1IcIIitJ.
EXHIBIT -A-
I ..
-. ......... r:~
-.- u ...
.f;.' -
I -=:.. -:... - -==-.::: I~N laR1 ONO~3 I "'''- .j
--- I
II - w. __ .u.
"Doa..
z
j
~
~
~
~
r.f)
2
."
Z ;,
I ~
I
III
t
~
~
<
Z
~
~
~
...:l
~
p:=
~
. .~v
. . . '..~:;o
. . ~.:W
. ,.
. . ::,..i
. .
. . "',-:.'" '.
.
. .
lO."
c::l
Z
101
t:l
~
I I g 5 I
i I I I I I
II I I I I
--~
&~/y
i
~
w.olW:l ViSVo W"nO
-.-
wZ
It::)
I VlCL
~ ~ ~ Iii
I ,
. ~
'- .
. . ~
. . .
':':<..."'=J"-~-=-
-- - --
--
"!)'O'~
II
3NrtLN 38n1 ONO:>3
911 IIJIIJ'I1N WOlS
~~'O'i.
....'i.'?-'i.
'i.<;f>~
\
'9.
'n.....~...
.lio.."....;.".......... ......~
*V Jl"-"Jttc;,)o)
z
5 . I I I ~ ! I I
a.. , . .
w I I J
I I I ! I I!
l- I I I
(/)
>- I I I If II
0::: . I
<( I
z --I I I I II I
~ III
:l t
:J 'il I I . I . ,
W I l"fl'
j
0::: GoI ~ OOsl)~m
a..
-~- ~~?S
11/1:lj
I, .1
Il/iB!
.
z-i
I- ii~r I .. ..gla~1 I
h!!ll I I ~ ~ ~" =# .. I It e :- ..
I-
i1~rl ft ~ ! o /II Y '.~ ~'DI<<J~ Ii < . I' 18
I I, D' 1 II II
I ii,
."
1111
II'l
~ il'I'
iii'
\cif-
\
\
\
I
\
\
\
\
I
\
"
"I
I',
,I,
I"
~ I !I'l
W,,_ I'
DO II:
.c r~
DO 1'1
gl" "
~ 111.11'
-----
<:>
I
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
\
I
\
I
,
:~
.
.
: 1
.
.
,
I '. ~
~ ~ l E
~ " ..
14 !i
:. I:]
, '
. .
, ..~
.. -
"11 .
I'! ill 'I,
gj l'ld'
l5 l!l!" 1'111
:z: hl",' I'"
nlol',l'
~ !I,l!i ill Ii
0::11""11"'1
Ol"I'1 III
~ '1',!lll"li ,
~.II1f1!1
I I 'I I
:,:j II d Id U II 'I II
11'lq ,dll R'd I I. II!'
?rijr:! ~iii!!d!l'i "HI I dill
liI,,1I1 ~ I! i II ,1j!1 Ii 'I 11,1, i ~ll i
iimRI :ii!II!~IIII'I!ilqil. 111I!
II 11"1 lIt ~ &tllllIl! ; 1111. III I Hi"
jl! .Il'. l;:I:II:II:II:IElI:IElI:IElElElElElElElElIDElEll!l
--:---
<:>
u .
- --1;)'1.,., :!
-
,
.
.
.
.
.
EI--i
" .
. .
\:' f !
.. ,
~ ~I
" '
: ~ :
. . .
'_' I
I
.
,
.
,
,
,
': !I
, h
I'
,
t
-
.-.... ---.,
,"
I
.,
f
<:>
I
-
..
6- i
I
€I
---
J
~ - ?cf
-
~l
~
'"
DO
o
o
,..,
...
EXTERIOR FINISHES:
ELEVATION NOTES:
II] -----e
I!J ------e
o ------E)
G -----(9
III --.-- -.---
rn -----..-e
0-----"-
m -----.~
~ -----e
-------
8J :::===e--
[3 --.- e
. ----.
1- ---..-.-
Q - -.-..---
D _ _..___
.. -- -.-..---
., ---.--
.. -- _._--
SITE SECTION THRU BUlLDIl'lGIPARKIl'lGIBERloIINGISTREET-SCALE:I"IO'
L,-- 4 ~r
J:!J!Jrn~ ~
--
~
\:J
\3
EAsT ELEVAnOl'l
BRAKES
dJ d;
l'lORTH ELEVATION
:::>c
"'~
~
Z'"
o<c
_I ,.
~
, ,
.
., "
Ii !I
ll~l! i i
Cil Cil
I ;
III
I ! .
I!llill!l
I
IGl 4p
13Cillfm ! 'I' CV '.
~ll T I' ,I'
~!II4plli"'! .
Z I' I" ,',III
~1,liijl;JiII!
~ 1',111.,,";
1!l666666661!1~~1!l
I '
"
_, I , "
"" '
~Pi!1I
~llli!l
'" rllli
~ I IIII
E~
-
f '
~ ff~
~
5
II:
!:i
o
'"
-
c:;--?y
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
Meeting Date
7
6/20/95
Resolution ) 7'1.2 7 -Finding Compensation of
Unrepresented City Employees Unfixed and Uncertain
SO""'ED BY' City ..nager-1i~/5th' Vote, Ye,____ No X
Constitutional constraints surrounding the City's ability to alter
compensation of its employees after service has been rendered
requires the City Council to adopt the attached resolution making
the finding that compensation for unrepresented City officers and
employees is directly or indirectly tied to compensation of
represented employees and, as such, salaries of those represented
employees may not be fixed and definite on, or perhaps even
sometime after, July 1, 1995.
ITEM TITLE:
RECOMMENDATION:
Adopt the resolution.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: N/A
DISCUSSION: It appears as though negotiations with two of the
four recognized bargaining units (Chula Vista Employees Association
and Western Council of Engineers) may not be completed prior to the
commencement of fiscal year 1995-96. While it is the City's
position at the negotiating table that any agreements reached after
the commencement of the fiscal year will not be retroactive, such
an issue is and must be negotiated.
In the case of unrepresented employees or officers, constitutional
constraints would not allow for retroactive adjustments to the
compensation of unrepresented employees or officers unless a
declaration and finding by the City Council is made indicating that
such compensation is directly or indirectly tied to the
compensation of represented employees.
Adoption of the resolution does not automatically provide for
retroactivity, but provides a mechanism whereby the City Council
can legally make that determination when the negotiations process
is complete.
FISCAL IMPACT: While the adoption of this resolution does not have
an immediate fiscal impact, if the City Council approves a
retroactive compensation package as a result of the negotiations
process, there will be a future fiscal impact, the amount of which
is unknown at this time.
TAE:te
7-/
RESOLUTION NO.
/79;)7
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA FINDING COMPENSATION OF
UNREPRESENTED CITY EMPLOYEES UNFIXED AND
UNCERTAIN
WHEREAS, the City is involved with negotiations with its
represented employees to determine compensation to be paid to
represented employees for a period of time subsequent to the
expiration of existing Memoranda of Agreement with said represented
employees' recognized representatives; and
WHEREAS, negotiations
representatives may not be completed
next fiscal year; and
with said recognized
prior to the beginning of the
WHEREAS, the compensation of unrepresented officers and
employees in the City is directly or indirectly tied to the
compensation of represented persons.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED the City Council
of the City of Chula vista does find and declare that all
compensation for unrepresented city officers and employees is
directly or indirectly tied to compensation of represented City
employees and therefore is not fixed and definite on and after July
1, 1995.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the city Council of the City
of Chula vista does further find that, due to the expiration of
existing labor agreements with represented bargaining units on July
1, 1995, and the duty of the City to meet and confer with them, the
compensation of represented City employees is neither fixed nor
certain as of July 1, 1995.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the
direct that the salaries and compensation
unrepresented employees shall remain the
the City Council takes further action.
City Council does hereby
for both represented and
same until such time as
App 0 eII i form
John D. Goss
City Manager
Bruce M. Boo
City Attorne
Presented by
C:\rs\unfixed.sal
7~cA
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
Meeting Date
%
6/20/95
ITEM TITLE:
179.;.g-"
Resolution Establishing the Appropriations Limit for the
City of Chula Vista for Fiscal Year 1995-96
REVIEWED BY:
Director of Finan~eff_( i
City Manager~ ~~)
(4/5ths Vote: Yes No X )
--
SUBMITTED BY:
Article XIIIB of the California Constitution approved by the voters in 1979 and
commonly referred to as the Gann Initiative, requires each local government to
establish an Appropriations Limit by resolution each year at a regularly scheduled
meeting or noticed special meeting. The purpose of the limit is to restrict spending
of certain types of revenues to a level predicated on a base year amount increased
annually by an inflation factor.
RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt a resolution establishing an
appropriations limit of $160,883,640 for the 1995-96 fiscal year.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
Article XIIIB of the California Constitution, approved by the voters in 1979, imposed
the concept of spending limits on local governments. This Constitutional provision
and related implementing legislation specifies that annual increases in appropriations
financed from "Proceeds of Taxes" are limited to a base year (1978-79) amount
increased annually by an inflation factor comprised of the change in population of the
City combined with the greater of the change in new non-residential construction or
the change in the California per capita personal income. By definition, "Proceeds of
Taxes" includes such revenues as property taxes, sales and use taxes, utility users
taxes, transient occupancy taxes, and state subventions. Revenues from other
sources like fees/charges and federal grants are considered "Non-Proceeds of Taxes"
and are not subject to the annual spending limit.
?5---/
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date 6/20/95
~
The State Department of Finance and the San Diego County Assessor's Office are
charged with providing the data necessary for local jurisdictions to establish their
appropriation limit. According to these sources, for fiscal year 1995-96, the
population increased 2.72% and new non-residential construction increased 9.96%.
The California per capita personal income increased by 4.72 %, but was not used in
the formula to compute the limit since this increase was lower than the increase in
new non-residential construction.
The fiscal year 1995-96 Appropriation Limit has been calculated as follows:
Fiscal Year 1994-95 Appropriation Limit
$142.437,928
Increased by an inflation factor composed
of the increases in population and new non-
residential construction X 1.1295
Fiscal Year 1995-96 Appropriations Limit
$160.883.640
The "Proceeds of Taxes" as included in the Fiscal Year 1995-96 Proposed Budget that
are subject to the appropriations limit are estimated to be $32,619,521. Therefore
the City has what is referred to as an appropriation "gap" of $128,264,119
($160,883,640 - $32,619,521). Simply stated, this means that the City could collect
and spend up to $128,264,119 more in taxes during fiscal year 1995-96 without
exceeding the Constitutional limit.
FISCAL IMPACT: This action will enable the City to continue to appropriate and
spend tax revenues amounting to an estimated $32,619,521 in fiscal year 1995-96.
3'~.2
GANN LIMIT (PROP 41 GAP CALCULATION
FOR FISCAL YEAR 1995-96
Proceeds of Taxes
F.Y. 1995-96 ProDosed Budaet
$ 8,518,431
12,943,800
1,550,000
2,926,400
property Taxes
Sales and Use Taxes
Transient Lodging Taxes
Utility Users Taxes
Other Local Taxes:
Real Property Transfer
Business License
State Motor Vehicle Licenses
State Homeowners Property Taxes
230,000
930,000
5,345,890
175.000
Totals
32,619,521
Appropriations Limit
160.883.640
GAP (Under Limit)
($128.264.119)
g'J/'6-Lf
RESOLUTION NO.
J79~rI
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ESTABLISHING AN APPROPRIATIONS
LIMIT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1995-96 PURSUANT TO
ARTICLE XIIIB OF THE CALIFORNIA CONSTITUTION
WHEREAS, Article XIIIB of the California Constitution
provides that the total annual appropriations subject to limitation
of each governmental entity, including this city, shall not exceed
the appropriation limit of such entity of government for the prior
year adjusted for changes in population and inflation mandated by
Proposition 4 passed in November, 1979 and Proposition 111 in June,
1990 except as otherwise provided for in said Article XIIIB and
implementing state statues; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to said Article XIIIB of said
California Constitution, and section 7900 et seq. of the California
Government Code, the city is required to set its appropriation
limit for each fiscal year; and
WHEREAS, the Director of Finance of the City of Chula
vista has interpreted the technical provisions of said
propositional computations and has reviewed documentation of the
City's said appropriation limitation; and
WHEREAS, based on such calculations the Director of
Finance Administrator has determined the said appropriation limit
and, pursuant to section 7910 of said California Government Code,
has made available to the public the documentation used in the
determination of said appropriation limit.
NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
city of Chula vista, California that said appropriation limit for
Fiscal Year 1995-96 shall be and is hereby set in the amount of
$160,883,640 for said Fiscal Year.
ory
Presented by
Robert Powell, Director of
Finance
Bruce M.
Attorney
c: \rs\Applillit
2"'5'/ Z'fy
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item 9
Meeting Date 06/20/95
ITEM TITLE:
Resolution /79.2 ~pproving an agreement between the City of Chula Vista
and McKinley Davy Architects for architectural services for the Otay Park
Gymnasium Project (CIP-PR-I~3"*)
Director of Parks ~d Rec:F]~
City ManagerJb. ~ ~
(4/5ths Vote: Yes _ No ..xJ
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
The City Council approved a Master Plan for Otay Park which addressed improvements to a nine acre
area. A portion of the nine acres (approximately 2 acres) is located at Otay School. In the Master Plan,
a site for a gymnasium was identified on Otay School grounds (site map - Attachment "A"). During the
discussion on the Master Plan, the Otay neighborhood residents informed Council that the gymnasium
should be constructed in advance of the park improvements. The Council approved the construction of
a gymnasium and appropriated funds in FY 94/95 ($250,000) for the design and construction documents
required to build the facility.
In December 1994, the Department issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) to solicit local
architectural/design firms to prepare the plans, specifications, cost estimates, and any other project related
items for the gymnasium project. This report discusses the consultant selection process, the scope of
work for the construction of the Otay Park Gymnasium, and the State of California requirements of
building a facility on school grounds.
RECOMMENDATION: That the Council approve the Resolution and authorize the Mayor to execute
said Agreement with McKinley Davy Architects for consultant and project management services for the
Otay Park Gymnasium project.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: N/A
DISCUSSION: In December 1994, the Department issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) in order to
obtain a qualified consultant to provide architectural and project management consulting services to assist
in the design, construction, and project management of a gymnasium. The proposed project site is on
Otay School grounds, and under the ownership of the Chula Vista Elementary School District property.
The facility is proposed to be constructed adjacent to the Otay Center building. This particular location
would maximize the City's ability to develop a community hub of diverse service offerings.
Consultant Selection Process
The procedures, as outlined in Council Policy #102-03 for the selection of the consultant, were utilized
by the Department to select the consultant for this project. The RFP was sent to over 50 firms,
advertised in the Star News, and distributed by a professional project information services firm. The
[AII3 - gymarchi.a13]
I
9-/
f
Item
Meeting Date 06/20/95
Department received ten replies (all San Diego County firms) to the RFP. A City Selection Committee,
comprised of representatives from the Parks and Recreation Commission, the Public Works Department's
Engineering and Operations Divisions; the Planning Department, and the Parks and Recreation
Department. The Committee evaluated the proposals and fees, and "short-listed" 4 firms to make a
presentation.
The Department prepared the RFP and the rating sheets, and the Selection Committee scored each of the
4 "short-listed" firms using the criteria listed below. Each criteria was weighted from 5 to 15 points.
Each committee member was instructed to rate each firm on a scale from 1 to 5; 5 being the highest, in
each of the categories. Their rating number was then multiplied by the weighted points to achieve a score
for each criteria. The total points for each of the 4 firms, listed below in the table, is a compilation of
their final scores for each criteria (5 raters x each criteria score x weighted number = final score for each
firm).
The criteria the Selection Committee utilized was:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Related project experience
Firm's ability and capacity to perform the work
Methodology employed to ensure project success
Management approach for technical requirements
Use of consultants that may work on the project
Time schedule planned for this project
Firm's experience and methods used for
Maintenance of building considerations
Quality of oral presentation
10 points weight
5 points weight
10 points weight
15 points weight
10 points weight
10 points weight
10 points weight
10 points weight
5 points weight
The following are the results of the Selection Committee's analysis:
Architect Score Rank
McKinley Davy 1898.0 1
Rob Wellington Quigley 1732.5 2
Whee1er- Wimer-Blackman 1717.0 3
RuhnaulRuhnau 1567.0 4
At the conclusion of the process, McKinley Davy Architects was the lowest cost proposal, deemed the
most qualified firm because of their extensive experience in designing gymnasiums for the San Diego
School District, their interpersonal skills noted in the interview process, their community-teamwork
philosophy, and their knowledge of the proposed project. Moreover, the firm proposed a community
workshop based on utilizing small moveable room components, and a computer assisted drafting program.
[AII3 - gymarchLa13]
2
9,e::<.
Item
Meeting Date 06/20/95
'1
The community workshop will involve the architect and design team stationing themselves at the Otay
Center for a period of 2 - 3 days and evenings to collect community input. They will make themselves
available to community groups, concerned citizens, commissions and affected agencies. Thereafter, the
consultant will hold a final evening community workshop to review the comments and suggestions. This
information will be used as a basis to begin the design development phase.
It is important to note that the firm toured the site and evaluated the opportunities and constraints of the
project. Conversely, some of the other firms that submitted RFP's didn't take the time to make site
visitation and understand the project's parameters.
The Department checked the consultant's references and conducted site visits to the schools that the firm
has designed. The reference sources consisted of project managers at the schools. They unequivocally
stated that the firm is qualified, and completed work in a timely manner and within budget.
The Department believes all four finalists were qualified to perform the required consultant services. It
was a difficult choice to recommend one firm to the Council; however, the deciding factor was that
McKinley Davy has the communication skills which will ensure that maximum input is achieved from
the community. This consultant has not done business with the City of Chula Vista in the past.
Scope of Work:
Phase I - Design Phase - will include:
1. Architectural
The architectural services shall include the preparation of plans, renderings, and color boards for
the entire multi-use facility.
2. Geotechnical Investigation and Testing
The project consultant will be responsible for ordering and recelVJng in time, appropriate
geotechnical investigation, testing, analysis, and recommendations required for the proposed
design work.
3. Public Meetings
The architectural services will include facilitation on all cItIzen input session and follow-up
presentations to community groups, the Parks and Recreation Commission, Design Review
Board, and City Council.
4. Preliminarv Submittal
Three preliminary sets of plans, specifications and cost estimates of completion shall be submitted
to the City for plan checking.
[A1l3 - gymarchi.a13]
3
1-3
Item CJ
Meeting Date 06/20/95
5. Plans. Soecifications. Cost Estimates
The consultant will provide one complete set of original specifications and one original set of full
size (24" x 36") photo, mylars. All plans and specifications shall be reviewed and approved by
the City prior to acceptance. Detailed final cost estimates will be provided to the City for review
and acceptance. In the event that the constructing bids exceed the project budget by 10% or
more, the Architect must revise the construction drawings so the project can be constructed to
the City's satisfaction within the funds available. There will be no extra charge to the City for
these revisions.
In Phase II - Construction Phase - the consultant shall:
1. Assist in the analysis of bid results and provide necessary recommendation on the award of
construction contracts.
2. Attend preconstruction conference.
3. Check detailed construction and shop drawings, if any, submitted by the contractor for
compliance with construction documents.
4. Provide consultation and advise during construction.
5. Establish weekly job site meetings to observe the work in progress and provide appropriate
reports to the City.
6. Prepare sketches and/or revisions and provide clarification as required to resolve unforeseen
problems.
7. Make final inspection, report on the completed project, and prepare a punch list.
8. Note all approved change orders on the contract drawings and prepare final "as built" drawings
for City's record.
9. Assist the City in the Project Closeout Punch List, warranties, and Operation and Maintenance
manuals.
The time schedule for the construction phase of the contract is estimated to be 26 weeks. The date for
completion of all consultant services is February 1, 1997. The consultant will deliver the services in
three components: (1) Program Schematic Design, (2) Design Development/Construction Documents,
and (3) Bidding/Construction Administration.
[A113 - gymarchi.a13]
4
9~Y
Item 9
Meeting Date 06/20/95
Cost of the Consultant
Based on negotiations with the Department's recommended consultant, and the negotiating guidelines
outlined in the Municipal Code (Chapter 2.56 - Purchasing System, 2.56.230 - Consultants Selection
Process, Section B.4. - Negotiating a Price determined to be fair and reasonable), the total contract cost
of $122,700 includes all the components of the scope of work described above.
In addition to the proposed scope of work, the Department would like to see the following services
included, which were not specified in the original RFP. These new items have been negotiated since the
initial proposal price was submitted. In addition, as discussed below, there will be higher costs associated
with the project due to the required oversight by the Division of State Architect, in order to accommodate
any joint use with the Chula Elementary School District.
1. $2,400 for a presentation model of the project. This model will be a valuable tool in working
with the community to present the design. (Not part of the RFP.)
2. $1,000 for ten copies of the construction documents. (Not part of the RFP.)
3. $4,000 for the increase in structural engineering costs by the consultant for the requirement of
Department of State Architect review. (School District requirement.)
4. $9,300 for an additional 155 hours of architectural effort during the construction document and
construction administration phases to the requirement of Department of State Architect review.
(School District requirement.)
The contract cost does not include expenses for the contractual services of a licensed Landscape Architect.
The Department has a licensed Landscape Architect on staff who will be furnishing these services on the
project. The funding for the staff services associated with this effort are included in the existing
appropriation for the project. By using in-house staff, the Department estimates that it will save
approximately $30,000 in outside contractual services. While there may be some liability risk associated
with the use of staff, due mainly to any errors or omissions in the design or installation of the
landscaping, staff believes the risk will be minimal. The City utilized in-house landscape architectural
staff on many capital improvement projects. Specifically, the Landscape Architect was used on the
Norman Park Center landscaping design and installation oversight. Other examples include the Civic
Center addition project, Rohr Park, and Lauderbach Park play equipment renovation.
Bids of Other RFP ResDondents
Not all of the firms who submitted a response to the RFP including a fee proposal in their response.
However, in order to compare the proposed contract price to the other firm's responses, the following
is provided:
[AI13 -gymarchi.aI3]
5
9-5
Item 7
Meeting Date 06/20/95
FIRM FEE
Rob Wellington Quigley Non-Responsive
Wheeler/Wimer/Blackman Non-Responsive
Roesling-N akamura $191,610
Kenneth Backes and Associates $183,750
Richard Bundy $170,000
Architectural Concepts $158,500
Manuel Oncina $153,610
Dwight Rogers $133,800
Ruhnau-Ruhnau & Assoc. $115,000
McKinley Davy Architect $106,000
The fees listed in the table above do not include the items that were negotiated following the RFP
process. It must be pointed out that the only major difference between the fee proposal submitted by
McKinley Davy Architects and the final negotiated fee is the $9,300 related to State architect review.
Since the District had indicated early on in the planning process, an interest in a land donation to the
City, staff didn't believe DSA review would be necessary. Accordingly, staff didn't include this
information in the RFP. The increase in fees from the original proposal is directly related to State
review. This fee increase would have been necessary despite who was chosen to perform the service.
In any event, McKinley Davy, even with the fee increase, is second to lowest on the list of architects
submitting proposals with fees.
The Gvmnasium Components
In general, the gymnasium space is envisioned to range between 12,000 and 14,000 square feet, using
either masonry or concrete tilt -up construction. The space will include a gymnasium area, related office
area, program spaces, and restrooms. The structure will have one regulation high school basketball court
with two smaller practice courts, side by side, superimposed on the main court; striping for volleyball
and badminton courts; seating for 150 - 200 spectators using retractable bleachers; and energy efficient
lighting systems. The gymnasium program could be modified after further community input.
The design concept will optimize energy efficiency, durability, promote the ease of maintenance, and
meet all handicap access standards. Provisions for user safety will be incorporated as an integral part
of the facility design.
[A113 ~ gymarchLal3]
6
9,?
Item 7
Meeting Date 06/20/95
Joint Use with the Chula Vista Elementarv School District
Since the proposed site is on school district property, the project is subject to State Architectural plan
review and construction inspection. The fiscal impact to the City would be approximately 20 % greater
than our capital improvement public works projects. As a way to avoid additional financial impacts, staff
has, over the past nine months, attempted to secure a donation of school district land to the City. Late
last year, the school district had indicated an interest in this approach. However, staff was recently
informed that this was infeasible because of the Educational Code. Apparently, students would not be
able to access the gymnasium after the third year of operation because it didn't meet State Architect
Standards. The School District has been supportive of this project, as indicated in the attached letter
(Attachment "B"). In May of this year, staff presented the project to the Elementary School Board.
Although no formal action was taken, the Board expressed great interest in the project and a strong
willingness to cooperate on a joint-use basis. The Board's main concern was the opportunity for student
access of the gymnasium during school hours. Apparently, they are interested in engaging in the similar
joint-use relationship that the Sweetwater Union High School District has with the City (Chula Vista
Community Youth Center and Chula Vista Community Park).
Based on this information, staff can pursue a land lease and joint-use agreement with the District. Staff
hopes to bring this information back to Council in approximately three months.
The City Attorney has asked that we advise you of the risk inherent in the sequence of events as follows:
We do not currently have site control either by fee, land lease, or option. Until the City has control over
the site, the early investment in engineering services may be lost if the engineering plans can not be used
on the expected school site.
City has been unable to consummate site control at this time because of on-going negotiations with the
elementary school district. Staff anticipates that these negotiations will come to a conclusion in early
July; whereupon staff will bring forward to Council a proposal for a land lease with the Chula Vista
Elementary School District.
Staff still recommends proceeding with the architectural/engineering contract at this time for the following
reasons:
1. Council has identified this project as a priority.
2. The contract is worded as a phased fixed fee arrangement such that if, after the initial
program schematic phase, we can terminate without being liable for later phases. The
City may incur $13,300 in architect costs for DSA review. depending upon when the
contract is terminated. However, this risk is not likely to occur because it is staff's intent
to negotiate a land lease with the school district before these costs occur.
[AI13 -gymarchi.aJ3] 7
9-7
Item 9
Meeting Date 06/20/95
3. The architectural/engineering services incurred in the first phase can be re-utilized
regardless of the site, and may, if another site can be found at a reasonable price such
that the Council wishes to go ahead despite additional land costs, the early investment in
engineering services may be re-utilized.
As noted earlier in this report, the City would be required to build in accordance with the Division of
State Architect's (DSA) design specifications and construction oversight. A 20 % increase in the project's
plan check and inspection will add approximately $200,000 to the cost of the overall project. Unless
otherwise directed, staff believes the site is ideal and lends itself to optimum shared use of facilities.
However, Council may want staff to analyze other non-school sites, such as Otay Park.
As discussed above, because the gymnasium is being built on school district property, the State Education
Code requires that the building be constructed under State Architect Division oversight. If the City does
not include this oversight within the project costs, students will not be able to access the gymnasium.
In 1992, the City experienced higher project costs when the Community Youth Center was built on Chula
Vista High School property. Council may recall the City financed the construction of the Youth Center
at a cost of approximately $1. 6 million. The State Architect was involved during the design and
construction phases of this project. In this particular project, the City entered into a land lease and joint-
use agreement with the Sweetwater Union High School District. Because of State review, the design and
review of the project added another few months to the project's schedule. Since its opening, the City
shares the facility with the school district and the Boys and Girls Club.
FISCAL IMPACT: The cost of the contract for architect and design services is $122,700. Sufficient
funds are appropriated and available in the Otay Park Gymnasium Project account, PR-133, to pay for
these services (1994-95). The remainder of the project budget is proposed for the CIP budgets in 1995-
96 and 1996-97. The entire project is estimated to cost $2,013,400 (including the DSA funding
[$200,000] requirements [not currrently budgeted]). The project budget proposed in the FY 1995/96 CIP
process includes $69,900 for preparatory planning, $223,500 for architectural/design services, and
$1,520,000 for construction.
This next year, the City plans to secure a Section 108 loan from HUD in the amount of $500,000 -
$600,000 to help finance the project.
It should also be noted that once the gymnasium is built and occupied, there will be budgeted costs
associated with staffing and operation of the gymnasium. The exact amount of these costs is unknown
at this time. It is anticipated that the majority of these costs will occur in FY 1997/98.
Attachments -
"A" - Project Site Map
"B" - Letter of Interest from Chula Vista Elementary School District
Agreement
Disclosure Statement
[AI13 -gymarchi.a13]
8
9-%
RESOLUTION NO.
/71"<9
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND McKINLEY DAVY
ARCHITECTS FOR ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES FOR THE
OTAY PARK GYMNASIUM PROJECT (CIP-PR-133)
WHEREAS, on May 24, 1994, the city Council approved a
Master Plan for otay Park which Master Plan addressed improvements
to a nine acre area which included Otay Park and the open field
area at otay School; and
WHEREAS, in the Master Plan, a site for a gymnasium was
identified on a portion of the Otay School field area; and
WHEREAS, during the discussion on the Master Plan, the
Otay neighborhood residents informed Council that the gymnasium
should be constructed in advance of the park improvements; and
WHEREAS, the Council approved the construction of a
gymnasium and appropriated funds in FY 94/95 ($250,000) for the
design and construction documents required to build the facility;
and
WHEREAS, in December 1994, the Department issued a
Request for Proposal (RFP) to solicit local architectural/design
firms to prepare the plans, specifications, cost estimates, and any
other project related items for the gymnasium project; and
WHEREAS, the procedures, as outlined in Council Policy
#102-03 for the selection of the consultant, were utilized by the
Department to select the consultant for this project; and
WHEREAS, the Selection Committee deemed McKinley Davy
Architects as the most qualified firm because of their extensive
experience in working with school districts, their experience in
designing gymnasiums for the San Diego School District, their
interpersonal skills noted in the interview process, their
community-teamwork philosophy, and their knowledge of the proposed
project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the
City of Chula vista does hereby approve an agreement between the
City of Chula vista and McKinley Davy Architects for architectural
services for the otay Park Gymnasium Project (CIP-PR-133), a copy
of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk as Document No.
(to be completed by the city Clerk in the final document).
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of
Chula vista is hereby authorized and dire d to execute said
Agreement for and on behalf of the city ~~la V'st:.for~
Presented by ~/t s t~ y
Jess Valenzuela, Director of
Parks and Recreation
C\ rs\ Illckinley
Bruce M.
/ . Attorney
9-9 q-Io
J t- '1mb I
\ ! I' f.u,,! "'0
" ./ ~~~ -, , '.. ,~-. " ., '
'\..J'/'r:',' )~~..-.
'../ I .... \
.. i, "00 ...
I. ....,
1\
.. '
'. )
. '.
,
._~i_
..
: /
i
I
! ....
,"
MERCIALI
INDUSTRIAl.
>.
z
c(
CD
-'
t~i'
,
,
.,. I.:.~:.. ('
... S.D.G. & E.~.
UBSTATION..... \_)
i... .... \," .~\;;;
,"[I.! q ~:~"'\'.'-dJ
[~ 't '. 'lO!jlJ ~.[IHV \ .~.
i<.,.,/-'~:~~.--..,,/..\+. I ,., I
.".. I ' ....., '.~.' .... I /.;
. J ... ".~ ...' \ .... ;.1..;'" . .... . ..-;/'! ."~ ,"_"..
r" - ... ,~-- ""~.--" '--- m.... f L~__, ......, D~,... "
.:.I~.>-~~..- '. J;;N /..~t.='~~"~ .~~ 2'
(-.:... ,,;, ...I...:.-i.;-,--.L,:',:,:=: (....:.,~,;~( -. -:-.,,~ ... ~r" I~ _..
OTAV PAR!K RENOVATION -.GVMNASIUM ! ,4\ ~
f-/! \j) .,. >O'!O 100
""""
2:46 CHULA VISTA SCHOOL DIST.
P.82
JUH- 7-95 WED
1I0ARD OF EDUCATION
JOSEPH D. CUMMINGS, I'I\D.
--
P/\1FtlJ(AJUOO
PAMELA a. SMIIIf
MKASPE\'RER
8UPERINTENDENT
~S.GlL.PhD,
ATTACHMENT "B"
CHULA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT
84 EAST "J- STREET . CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 91910 . 619 425-960(}
EAOH OHILD IS AN INDIVIDUAL OF GREAT WORTH
June 7.1995
Mr. Jess Valenzuela
City of Chula Visla
Parks and Recreation
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
RE: Construction of Gymnasium on Otay School Campus
Dear Mr. Valenzuela:
On May 16, 1995, the Board of Education heard the City's proposal to construct a
community gym on the Olay School campus, adjacent to the MAAC Center. The
City asked that the District donate the approximately two acres to the City. One acre
is needed for the building, and the remainder for access.
While the actual method which will be utilized to permit this construction has not
been finalized, it is the Districfs intention to make this land available to the City for a
gym through a land lease and an easement for access.
It is also the District:s intent to enter into a joint use agreement with the City, so that
our students can use the facility. To echieve this, construction of the gym must be to
Division of Slate Architect standards.
LasUy, prior to executing either of the above, the District requests a commitment by
the City Council to make the planned improvements to Olay Park a priority, since
this community Is virtually devoid of recreational opportunities. Park Improvements
are a high priority for the Board inasmuch as school play area will be lost due to
construction of the gym, and the ballfields included in the park plan will parlly
compensate for this loss. Also, our ability to convert this school to a K-6
configuration would be hampered if playground area is lost or reduced.
If you have any questions, please contact me or Kate Shul'Son.
-
~o n E. Linn
A istant Superintendent, Business Services
EL:KS:dp
t G-(k)tay doc:
9-/:2...
Agreement between
City of Chula Vista
and
McKinley Davy Architects
for Architectural and Design Consulting Services
This agreement ("Agreement"), dated June 13, 1995 for the purposes of reference only, and
effective as of the date last executed unless another date is otherwise specified in Exhibit A, Paragraph
I is between the City-related entity as is indicated on Exhibit A, paragraph 2, as such ("City"), whose
business form is set forth on Exhibit A, paragraph 3, and the entity indicated on the anached Exhibit A,
paragraph 4, as Consultant, whose business form is set forth on Exhibit A, paragraph 5, and whose place
of business and telephone numbers are set forth on Exhibit A, paragraph 6 ("Consultant"), and is made
with reference to the following facts:
Recitals
Whereas, the City of Chula Vista desires to construct a gymnasium adjacent to Otay School; and.
Whereas, the City desires 10 utilize the services of a professional architect and design firm for
consulting services and project management; and,
Whereas. Consultant warrants and represents that they are experienced and staffed in a manner
such that they are and can prepare and deliver the services required of Consultant to City within the time
frames herein provided all in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City and Consultant do hereby mutually agree
as follows:
1. Consultant's Duties
A. General Duties
Consultant shall perform all of the services described on the auached Exhibit A. Paragraph 7.
entitled "General Duties"; and,
B. Scope of Work and Schedule
In the process of performing and delivering said "General Duties", Consultant shall also perform
all of the services described in Exhibit A, Paragraph 8, entitled" Scope of Work and Schedule", not
inconsistent with the General Duties, according to, and within the time frames set forth in Exhibit A.
Paragraph 8, and deliver to City such Deliverables as are identified in Exhibit A, Paragraph 8, within
the time frames set forth therein, time being of the essence of this agreement. The General Duties and
the work and deliverables required in the Scope of Work and Schedule shall be herein referred to as the
Davy2Pty.agr
June 8, 1995
Page I
9-/J
"Defined Services". Failure to complete the Defined Services by the times indicated does not, except at
the option of the City, operate to terminate this Agreement.
C. Reductions in Scope of Work
City may independently, or upon request from Consultant, from time to time reduce the Defined
Services to be performed by the Consultant under this Agreement. Upon doing so, City and Consultant
agree to meet in good faith and confer for the purpose of negotiating a corresponding reduction in the
compensation associated with said reduction.
D. Additional Services
In addition to performing the Defined Services herein set forth, City may require Consultant to
perform additional consulting services related to the Defined Services ("Additional Services"), and upon
doing so in writing, if they are within the scope of services offered by Consultant, Consultant shall
perform same on a time and materials basis at the rates set forth in the "Rate Schedule" in Exhibit A.
Paragraph 11 (C), unless a separate fixed fee is otherwise agreed upon. All compensation for Additional
Services shall be paid monthly as billed.
E. Standard of Care
Consultant, in performing any Services under this agreement, whether Defined Services or
Additional Services, shall perform in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily
exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions and in similar
locations.
F. Insurance
Consultant represents that it and its agents, staff and subconsultants employed by it in connection
with the Services required to be rendered, are protected against the risk of loss by the following insurance
coverages. in the following categories, and to the limits specified, policies of which are issued by
Insurance Companies that have a Best's Rating of "A, Class V" or better, or shall meet with the approval
of the City:
Statutory Worker's Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance coverage in the
amount set forth in the attached Exhibit A, Paragraph 9.
Commercial General Liability Insurance including Business Automobile Insurance coverage in
the amount set forth in Exhibit A, Paragraph 9, combined single limit applied separately to each project
away from premises owned or rented by Consultant, which names City and Applicant as an Additional
Insured, and which is primary to any policy which the City may otherwise carry ("Primary Coverage").
and which treats the employees of the City and Applicant in the same manner as members of the general
public ("Cross-liability Coverage").
Errors and Omissions insurance, in the amount set forth in Exhibit A, Paragraph 9, unless Errors
and Omissions coverage is included in the General Liability policy.
Davy2Pty.agr
June 8, 1995
Page 2
1j-/1
G. Proof of Insurance Coverage.
(1) Certificates of Insurance.
Consultant shall demonstrate proof of coverage herein required, prior to the
commencement of services required under this Agreement. by delivery of Certificates of Insurance
demonstrating same, and further indicating that the policies may not be canceled without at least thirty
(30) days written notice to the Additional Insured.
(2) Policy Endorsements Required.
In order to demonstrate the Additional Insured Coverage, Primary Coverage and
Cross-liability Coverage required under Consultant's Commercial General Liability Insurance Policy,
Consultant shall deliver a policy endorsement to the City demonstrating same, which shall be reviewed
and approved by the Risk Manager.
H. Securitv for Performance.
(1) Performance Bond.
In the event that Exhibit A, at Paragraph 19, indicates the need for Consultant to provide
a Performance Bond (indicated by a check mark in the parenthetical space immediately preceding the
subparagraph entitled "Performance Bond"), then Consultant shall provide to the City a performance bond
by a surety and in a form and amount satisfactory to the Risk Manager or City Attorney which amount
is indicated in the space adjacent to the term, "Performance Bond", in said Paragraph 19. Exhibit A.
(2) Letter of Credit.
In the event that Exhibit A, at Paragraph 19, indicates the need for Consultant to provide
a Letter of Credit (indicated by a check mark in the parenthetical space immediately preceding the
subparagraph entitled "Letter of Credit"), then Consultant shall provide to the City an irrevocable letter
of credit callable by the City at their unfettered discretion by submitting to the bank a letter. signed by
the City Manager, stating that the Consultant is in breach of the terms of this Agreement. The letter of
credit shall be issued by a bank, and be in a form and amount satisfactory to the Risk Manager or City
Attorney which amount is indicated in the space adjacent to the term. "Letter of Credit". in said
Paragraph 19, Exhibit A.
(3) Other Security
In the event that Exhibit A, at Paragraph 19, indicates the need for Consultant to provide
security other than a Performance Bond or a Letter of Credit (indicated by a check mark in the
parenthetical space immediately preceding the subparagraph entitled "Other Security"), then Consultant
shall provide to the City such other security therein listed in a form and amount satisfactory to the Risk
Manager or City Attorney.
Davy2Pty. agr
June 8, 1995
Page 3
9'15
I. Business License
Consultant agrees to obtain a business license from the City and to otherwise comply with Title
5 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code.
2. Duties of the City
A. Consultation and Cooperation
City shall regularly consult the Consultant for the purpose of reviewing the progress of the
Defined Services and Schedule therein contained, and to provide direction and guidance to achieve the
objectives of this agreement. The City shall permit access to its office facilities, files and records by
Consultant throughout the term of the agreement. In addition thereto, City agrees to provide the
information, data, items and materials set forth on Exhibit A, Paragraph 10, and with the funher
understanding that delay in the provision of these materials beyond 30 days after authorization to proceed.
shall constitute a basis for the justifiable delay in the Consultant's performance of this agreement.
B. Compensation
Upon receipt of a properly prepared billing from Consultant submilled to the City periodically
as indicated in Exhibit A, Paragraph 18, but in no event more frequently than monthly, on the day of the
period indicated in Exhibit A, Paragraph 18, City shall compensate Consultant for all services rendered
by Consultant according to the terms and conditions set fonh in Exhibit A, Paragraph II, adjacent to the
governing compensation relationship indicated by a "checkmark" next to the appropriate arrangement.
subject to the requirements for retention set fonh in paragraph 19 of Exhibit A, and shall compensate
Consultant for out of pocket expenses as provided in Exhibit A, Paragraph 12.
All billings submilled by Consultant shall contain sufficient information as to the propriety of the
billing to permit the City to evaluate that the amount due and payable thereunder is proper. and shall
specifically contain the City's account number indicated on Exhibit A, Paragraph 18 (C) to be charged
upon making such payment.
3. Administration of Contract
Each pany designates the individuals ("Contract Administrators") indicated on Exhibit A.
Paragraph 13, as said party's contract administrator who is authorized by said pany to represent them
in the routine administration of this agreement.
4. Term.
This Agreement shall terminate when the Parties have complied with all executory provisions
hereof.
Davy2Pty.agr
June 8, 1995
Page 4
9 .j t-
5. Liquidated Damages
The provisions of this section apply if a Liquidated Damages Rate is provided in Exhibit A,
Paragraph 14.
It is acknowledged by both parties that time is of the essence in the completion of this Agreement.
It is difficult to estimate the amount of damages resulting from delay in performance. The parties have
used their judgment to arrive at a reasonable amount to compensate for delay.
Failure to complete the Defined Services within the allotted time period specified in this
Agreement shall result in the following penalty: For each consecutive calendar day in excess of the time
specified for the completion of the respective work assignment or Deliverable, the consultant shall pay
to the City, or have withheld from monies due, the sum of Liquidated Damages Rate provided in Exhibit
A, Paragraph 14 ("Liquidated Damages Rate").
Time extensions for delays beyond the consultant's control, other than delays caused by the City.
shall be requested in writing to the City's Contract Administrator, or designee, prior to the expiration of
the specified time. Extensions of time, when granted, will be based upon the effect of delays to the work
and will nO! be granted for delays to minor portions of work unless it can be shown that such delays did
or will delay the progress of the work.
6. Financial Interests of Consultant
A. Consultant is Designated as an FPPC Filer.
If Consultant is designated on Exhibit A, Paragraph IS, as an "FPPC filer", Consultant is deemed
to be a "Consultant" for the purposes of the Political Reform Act conflict of interest and disclosure
provisions. and shall report economic interests to the City Clerk on the required Statement of Economic
Interests in such reporting categories as are specified in Paragraph IS of Exhibit A, or if none are
specified, then as determined by the City Attorney.
B. Decline to Participate.
Regardless of whether Consultant is designated as an FPPC Filer, Consultant shall not make. or
participate in making or in any way attempt to use Consultant's position to influence a governmental
decision in which Consultant knows or has reason to know Consultant has a financial interest other than
the compensation promised by this Agreement.
C. Search to Determine Economic Interests.
Regardless of whether Consultant is designated as an FPPC Filer, Consultant warrants and
represents that Consultant has diligently conducted a search and inventory of Consultant's economic
interests, as the term is used in the regulations promulgated by the Fair Political Practices Commission.
and has determined that Consultant does not, to the best of Consultant's knowledge, have an economic
interest which would conflict with Consultant's duties under this agreement.
Davy2Pty.agr
June 8, 1995
Page 5
9-/7
D. Promise Not to Acquire Conflicting Interests.
Regardless of whether Consultant is designated as an FPPC Filer, Consultant further warrants
and represents that Consultant will not acquire, obtain, or assume an economic interest during the term
of this Agreement which would constitute a conflict of interest as prohibited by the Fair Political Practices
Act.
E. Duty to Advise of Conflicting Interests.
Regardless of whether Consultant is designated as an FPPC Filer, Consultant further warrants
and represents that Consultant will immediately advise the City Attorney of City if Consultant learns of
an economic interest of Consultant's which may result in a conflict of interest for the purpose of the Fair
Political Practices Act, and regulations promulgated thereunder.
F. Specific Warranties Against Economic Interests.
Consultant warrants and represents that neither Consultant, nor Consultant's immediate family
members, nor Consultant's employees or agents ("Consultant Associates") presently have any interest.
directly or indirectly, whatsoever in any property which may be the subject matter of the Defined
Services, or in any property within 2 radial miles from the exterior boundaries of any property which
may be the subject matter of the Defined Services, ("Prohibited Interest"), other than as listed in Exhibll
A, Paragraph 15.
Consultant further warrants and represents that no promise of future employment. remuneration.
consideration, gratuity or other reward or gain has been made to Consultant or Consultant Associates in
connection with Consultant's performance of this Agreement. Consultant promises to advise City of any
such promise that may be made during the Term of this Agreement, or for 12 months thereafter.
Consultant agrees that Consultant Associates shall not acquire any such Prohibited Interest within
the Term of this Agreement, or for ]2 months after the expiration of this Agreement. except with the
written permission of City.
Consultant may not conduct or solicit any business for any party to this Agreement. or for any
third party which may be in conflict with Consultant's responsibilities under this Agreement. except with
the written permission of City.
7. Hold Harmless
Consultant shall defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City. its elected and appointed
officers and employees, from and against all claims for damages, liability, cost and expense (including
without limitation attorneys' fees) arising out of the conduct of the Consultant, or any agent or employee.
subcontractors, or others in connection with the execution of the work covered by this Agreement, except
only for those claims arising from the sole negligence or sole willful conduct of the City, its officers, or
employees. Consultant's indemnification shall include any and all costs, expenses, attorneys' fees and
liability incurred by the City, its officers, agents, or employees in defending against such claims, whether
the same proceed to judgment or not. Further, Consultant at its own expense shall. upon written request
Davy2Pty . agr
June 8, 1995
Page 6
9~/g'
by the City, defend any such suit or action brought against the City, its officers, agents, or employees.
Consultants' indemnification of City shall not be limited by any prior or subsequent declaration by the
Consultant.
8. Termination of Agreement for Cause
If, through any cause, Consultant shall fail to fulfill in a timely and proper manner Consultant's
obligations under this Agreement, or if Consultant shall violate any of the covenants, agreements or
stipulations of this Agreement, City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving written
notice to Consultant of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof at least five (5) days
before the effective date of such termination. In that event, all finished or unfinished documents, data,
studies, surveys, drawings, maps, reports and other materials prepared by Consultant shall, at the option
of the City, become the property of the City, and Consultant shall be entitled to receive just and equitable
compensation for any work satisfactorily completed on such documents and other materials up to the
effective date of Notice of Termination, not to exceed the amounts payable hereunder, and less any
damages caused City by Consultant's breach.
9. Errors and Omissions
In the event that the City Administrator determines that the Consultants' negligence, errors, or
omissions in the performance of work under this Agreement has resulted in expense to City greater than
would have resulted if there were no such negligence, errors, omissions, Consultant shall reimburse City
for any additional expenses incurred by the City. Nothing herein is intended to limit City's rights under
other provisions of this agreement.
iO. Termination of Agreement for Convenience of City
City may terminate this Agreement at any time and for any reason, by giving specific written
notice to Consultant of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof, at least thirty (30) days
before the effective date of such termination. In that event, all finished and unfinished documents and
other materials described hereinabove shall, at the option of the City, become City's sole and exclusi\e
property. If the Agreement is terminated by City as provided in this paragraph, Consultant shall be
entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any satisfactory work completed on such documents
and other materials to the effective date of such termination. Consultant hereby expressly waives any and
all claims for damages or compensation arising under this Agreement except as set forth herein.
ii. Assignability
The services of Consultant are personal to the City, and Consultant shall not assign any interest
in this Agreement, and shall not transfer any interest in the same (whether by assignment or novation),
without prior written consent of City, which City may not unreasonably deny. City hereby consents to
the assignment of the portions of the Defined Services identified in Exhibit A, Paragraph i7 to the
subconsultants identified thereat as "Permitted Subconsultants",
Davy2Pty. agr
June 8, i995
Page 7
7'-/ i
12. Ownership, Publication, Reproduction and Use of Material
All reports, studies, information, data, statistics, forms, designs, plans, procedures, systems and
any other materials or properties produced under this Agreement shall be the sole and exclusive property
of City. No such materials or properties produced in whole or in part under this Agreement shall be
subject to private use, copyrights or patent rights by Consultant in the United States or in any other
country without the express written consent of City. City shall have unrestricted authority to publish,
disclose (except as may be limited by the provisions of the Public Records Act), distribute, and otherwise
use, copyright or patent, in whole or in part, any such reports, studies, data, statistics, forms or other
materials or properties produced under this Agreement.
13. Independent Contractor
City is interested only in the results obtained and Consultant shall perform as an independent
contractor with sole control of the manner and means of performing the services required under this
Agreement. City maintains the right only to rejec.t or accept Consultant's work products. Consultant and
any of the Consultant's agents, employees or representatives are, for all purposes under this Agreement.
an independent contractor and shall not be deemed to be an employee of City, and none of them shall be
entitled to any benefits to which City employees are entitled including but not limited to, overtime,
retirement benefits, worker's compensation benefits, injury leave or other leave benefits.
14. Administrative Claims Requirements and Procedures
No suit or arbitration shall be brought arising out of this agreement, against the City unless a
claim has first been presented in writing and filed with the City and acted upon by the City in accordance
with the procedures set forth in Chapter 1.34 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, as same may from time
to time be amended. the provisions of which are incorporated by this reference as if fully set fonh herein.
and such policies and procedures used by the City in the implementation of same
Upon request by City, Consultant shall meet and confer in good faith with City for the purpose
of resolving any dispute over the terms of this Agreement.
15. Attorney's Fees
Should a dispute arising out of this Agreement result in litigation, it is agreed that the prevailing
party shall be entitled to recover all reasonable costs incurred in the defense of the claim, including costs
and attorney's fees.
16. Statement of Costs
In the event that Consultant prepares a report or document, or participates in the preparation of
a report or document in performing the Defined Services, Consultant shall include, or cause the inclusion
of, in said report or document, a statement of the numbers and cost in dollar amounts of all contracts and
subcontracts relating to the preparation of the report or document.
Davy2Pty.agr
June 8, 1995
Page 8
j-;20
17. Miscellaneous
A. Consultant not authorized to Represent City
Unless specifically authorized in writing by City, Consultant shall have no authority to act as
City's agent to bind City to any contractual agreements whatsoever.
B. Consultant is Real Estate Broker and/or Salesman
If the box on Exhibit A, Paragraph 16 is marked, the Consultant and/or their principals is/are
licensed with the State of California or some other state as a licensed real estate broker or salesperson.
Otherwise, Consultant represents that neither Consultant, nor their principals are licensed real estate
brokers or salespersons.
C. Notices
All notices, demands or requests provided for or permitted to be given pursuant to this Agreement
must be in writing. All notices, demands and requests to be sent to any party shall be deemed to have
been properly given or served if personally served or deposited in the United States mail, addressed to
such party, postage prepaid, registered or certified, with return receipt requested. at the addresses
identified herein as the places of business for each of the designated parties.
D. Entire Agreement
This Agreement, together with any other written document referred to or contemplated herein.
embody the entire Agreement and understanding between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof.
Neither this Agreement nor any provision hereof may be amended, modified, waived or discharged except
by an instrument in writing executed by the party against which enforcement of such amendment. wai\er
or discharge is sought
E. Capacity of Parties
Each signatory and party hereto hereby warrants and represents to the other party that it has legal
authority and capacity and direction from its principal to enter into this Agreement, and that all
resolutions or other actions have been taken so as to enable it to enter into this Agreement.
F. Governing LawNenue
This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of
California. Any action arising under or relating to this Agreement shall be brought only in the federal
or state courts located in San Diego County, State of California, and if applicable, the City of Chula
Vista, or as close thereto as possible. Venue for this Agreement, and performance hereunder, shall be
the City of Chula Vista.
Davy2Pty.agr
June 8, 1995
Page 9
9':2/
Signature Page
to
Agreement between City of Chula Vista
and McKinley Davy Architects
for Architectural and Design Consulting Services
IN WITNESS WHEREOF. City and Consultant have executed this Agreement thereby indicating
that they have read and understood same. and indicate their full and complete consent to its terms:
Dated:
.19_
City of Chula Vista
by:
Shirley Horton, Mayor
Attest:
Beverly AutheJel. City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Bruce M. Boogaard, City Attorney
Dated:
By
By: ~-1.L/
[name of person, title]
Exhibit List to Agreement
(XX) Exhibit A.
() Exhibit B:
Davy2Pty.agr
June 8, 1995
Page 10
9---,22-
Exhibit A
to
Agreement between
City of Chula Vista
and
McKinley Davy Architects
1. Effective Date of Agreement:
June 13, 1995
2. City-Related Entity:
(X) City of Chula Vista, a municipal chartered corporation of the State of California
( ) Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista, a political subdivision of the State of
California
( ) Industrial Development Authority of the City of Chula Vista. a
()
Other:
,a ("City")
3. Place of Business for City:
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth A venue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
4. Consultant:
McKinley Davy Architects
Studio 307
7 10 Thirteenth Street
San Diego, CA 92101
5. Business Form of Consultant:
() Sole Proprietorship
(XX) Partnership
() Corporation
6. Place of Business, Telephone and Fax Number of Consultant:
Studio 307
7 I 0 Thirteenth Street
San Diego, CA 92101
Voice Phone (619) 238-3851
Fax Phone (619) 238-1020
Davy2PTY.ExA
June 8, 1995
Page I
9 ~..23
7. General Duties:
Architectural, engineering, construction document, and construction administration services for
the Otay Gymnasium project. The Architect will be conducting community workshops, providing
presentations, interface with City Department, and communicate with other related agencies. The
Architect will be required to furnish all necessary services in connection with the approval
process of the State of California Division of State Architect. In addition, should the Chula Vista
Elementary School District not agree to the land lease for the proposed site of the gymnasium,
there may be a site change, for which the consultant may be making engineering, design and/or
architectural changes.
8. Scope of Work and Schedule:
A. Detailed Scope of Work:
See Attachment Exhibit A-I
B. Date for Commencement of Consultant Services:
(X) Same as Effective Date of Agreement
() Other:
C. Dates or Time Limits for Delivery of Deliverables:
Deliverable No.1: Organizational Meeting: Programming: Preliminary Budget 2 weeks
Deliverable No.2: Schematic/Concept Design Drawings: Model 4 weeks
Deliverable No.3: Completion of Design Development;
35 % Completion of Construction Documents 10 weeks
Deliverable No.4: Completion of Construction Documents 10 weeks
Deliverable No.5: Complete Bidding; Contract Prepared and Awarded 8 weeks
Deliverable No.6: Construction 26 weeks
D. Date for completion of all Consultant services:
April I, 1997
9. Insurance Requirements:
(X) Statutory Worker's Compensation Insurance
(X) Employer's Liability Insurance coverage: $1,000,000.
(X) Commercial General Liabiliry Insurance: $1,000,000.
( ) Errors and Omissions insurance: None Required (included in Commercial General
Liabiliry coverage).
(X) Errors and Omissions Insurance: $250,000 (not included in Commercial General
Liability coverage).
Davy2PTY . ExA
June 8, 1995
Page 2
9-~(
10. Materials Required to be Supplied by City to Consultant:
Narrative outline of program requirements/activities
Soils Investigation and Report
Boundary and topographic survey of site
Plans of existing community center
Budget
11. Compensation:
A. () Single Fixed Fee Arrangement.
Hourly Fee Schedule Attached for additional services to be negotiated and not currently
covered by the scope of work
For performance of all of the Defined Services by Consultant as herein required, City shall pay
a single fixed fee in the amounts and at the times or milestones or for the Deliverables set forth below:
Single Fixed Fee Amount:
() 1. Interim Monthly Advances. The City shall make interim monthly advances against
the compensation due for each phase on a percentage of completion basis for each given
phase such that, at the end of each phase only the compensation for that phase has been
paid. Any payments made hereunder shall be considered as interest free loans which
must be returned to the City if the Phase is not satisfactorily completed. If the Phase is
satisfactorily completed, the City shall receive credit against the compensation due for
that phase. The retention amount or percentage set forth in Paragraph 19 is to be applied
to each interim payment such that, at the end of the phase, the full retention has been
held back from the compensation due for that phase. Percentage of completion of a
phase shall be assessed in the sole and unfettered discretion by the Contracts
Administrator designated herein by the City, or such other person as the City Manager
shall designate, but only upon such proof demanded by the City that has been provided.
but in no event shall such interim advance payment be made unless the Contractor shall
have represented in writing that said percentage of completion of the phase has been
performed by the Contractor. The practice of making interim monthly advances shall not
convert this agreement to a time and materials basis of payment.
Milestone or Event or Deliverable
Amount or Percent of Fixed Fee
B. (XX) Phased Fixed Fee Arrangement.
For the performance of each phase or portion of the Defined Services by Consultant as are
separately identified below, City shall pay the fixed fee associated with each phase of Services, in the
amounts and at the times or milestones or Deliverables set forth. Consultant shall not commence Services
Davy2PTY.ExA
June 8, 1995
Page 3
9 ~..25
under any Phase, and shall not be entitled to the compensation for a Phase, unless City shall have issued
a notice to proceed to Consultant as to said Phase.
Phase
% of Total Project Fee for Said Phase
Phase 1
Phase 2
Phase 3
Program/Schematic Design
Design development
Completion of Design Development Stage and
completion of 35 % of construction documents
Construction documents; Division of State Architect
Approval; Chula Vista plan check approvals
Bidding
Construction Administration
5%
10%
$ 6,385
$12,770
20%
$25,540
Phase 4
Phase 5
Phase 6
Phase 7
40%
5%
20%
$51,080
$ 6,385
$25,540
(XX) 1. Interim Monthly Advances. The City shall make interim monthly advances against
the compensation due for each phase on a percentage of completion basis for each given
phase such that, at the end of each phase only the compensation for that phase has been
paid. Any payments made hereunder shall be considered as interest free loans which
must be returned to the City if the Phase is not satisfactorily completed. If the Phase is
satisfactorily completed, the City shall receive credit against the compensation due for
that phase. The retention amount or percentage set forth in Paragraph 19 is to be applied
to each interim payment such that, at the end of the phase, the full retention has been
held back from the compensation due for that phase. Percentage of completion of a
phase shall be assessed in the sole and unfettered discretion by the Contracts
Administrator designated herein by the City, or such other person as the City Manager
shall designate, but only upon such proof demanded by the City that has been provided,
but in no event shall such interim advance payment be made unless the Contractor shall
have represented in writing that said percentage of completion of the phase has been
performed by the Contractor. The practice of making interim monthly advances shall not
convert this agreement to a time and materials basis of payment.
Total contract price is $122,700, subject to conditions stated above in the Interim Monthly
Advances language (Section I1.B.l).
Payments of invoices shall be due upon presentation. Work will be stopped immediately on all
accounts more than forty-five (45) days past due.
C. () Hourly Rate Arrangement
For performance of the Defined Services by Consultant as herein required, City shall pay
Consultant for the productive hours of time spent by Consultant in the performance of said Services, at
the rates or amounts set forth in the Rate Schedule hereinbelow according to the following terms and
conditions:
Davy2PTY.ExA
June 8, 1995
Page 4
<; -.2(,
(I) () Not-to-Exceed Limitation on Time and Materials Arrangement
Notwithstanding the expenditure by Consultant of time and materials in excess
of said Maximum Compensation amount, Consultant agrees that Consultant will perform
all of the Defined Services herein required of Consultant for $
including all Materials, and other "reimbursables" ("Maximum Compensation").
(2) ( ) Limitation without Funher Authorization on Time and Materials
Arrangement
At such time as Consultant shall have incurred time and materials equal to
("Authorization Limit"), Consultant shall not be entitled to any addi-
tional compensation without funher authorization issued in writing and approved by the
City. Nothing herein shall preclude Consultant from providing additional Services at
Consultant's own cost and expense.
Rate Schedule
Category of Employee
of Consultant
Name
Hourly
Rate
Principal
Project Architect
Project Designer
Job Captain
CAD Drafter - Tech I
CAD Drafter - Tech Jl
Clerical
Eric Davy
$105.00
$ 70.00
$ 70.00
$ 55.00
$ 45.00
$ 37.50
$ 30.00
) Hourly rates may increase by 6% for services rendered after [month]. 19 ,if
delay in providing services is caused by City.
12. Materials Reimbursement Arrangement
For the cost of out of pocket expenses incurred by Consultant in the performance of services
herein required, City shall pay Consultant at the rates or amounts set fonh below:
() None, the compensation includes all costs.
Cost or Rate
() Repons, not to exceed $ N/A :
() Copies, not to exceed $ N/A :
() Travel, not to exceed $ N / A :
(X) Printing, not to exceed $6,000:
() Postage, not to exceed $ N/A :
() Delivery, not to exceed $ N/A :
..
Davy2PTY.ExA
June 8, 1995
Page 5
9-..2 7
() Long Distance Telephone Charges,
not to exceed $ N/ A .
() Other Actual Identifiable Direct Costs:
, not to exceed $
, not to exceed $
..
Printing is for 60 sets of plans and specifications for DSA review and
bidding/construction phases. Architect will furnish the City 10 review sets as
part of the negotiated fee (at City cost), as well as a record set of reproducible
mylars (part of basic contract cost - Architect expense).
13. Contract Administrators:
City: Jess Valenzuela
Director of Parks and Recreation
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Consultant:
Eric Davy, Principal
McKinley Davy Architects
Studio 307
710 Thirteenth Street
San Diego, CA 92101
14. Liquidated Damages Rate:
Not Applicable
( ) $ per day.
( ) Other:
15. Statement of Economic Interests, Consultant Reporting Categories, per Conflict of Interest Code:
(XX) Not Applicable. Not an FPPC Filer.
( ) FPPC Filer
( )
( )
( )
( )
Davy2PTY.ExA
June 8, 1995
Category No. I. Investments and sources of income.
Category No.2. Interests in real property.
Category No.3, Investments, interest in real property and sources of income
subject to the regulatory, permit or licensing authority of the department.
Category No.4. Investments in business entities and sources of income which
engage in land development, construction or the acquisition or sale of real
property .
Page 6
9~..2 ~
() Category No.5. Investments in business entities and sources of income of the
type which, within the past two years, have contracted with the City of Chula
Vista (Redevelopment Agency) to provide services, supplies, materials,
machinery or equipment.
() Category No.6. Investments in business entities and sources of income of the
type which, within the past two years, have contracted with the designated
employee's department to provide services, supplies, materials, machinery or
equipment.
( ) Category No.7. Business positions.
( ) List "Consultant Associates" interests in real property within 2 radial miles of Project
Property, if any:
None
16 ( ) Consultant is Real Estate Broker and/or Salesman
17. Permitted Subconsultants:
Lopez Solorio & Associates
Fashandi & Associates
Pedro Medina & Associates
18. Bill Processing:
A. Consultant's Billing to be submitted for the following period of time:
(XX) Monthly
( ) Quarterly
( ) Other:
B. Day of the Period for submission of Consultant's Billing:
(XX) First of the Month
( ) 15th Day of each Month
( ) End of the Month
( ) Other:
C. City's Account Number: PR-J33
19. Security for Performance
( ) Performance Bond, $
( ) Letter of Credit, $
( ) Other Security:
Type:
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Not Applicable
Davy2PTY.ExA
June 8, 1995
Page 7
9,e:;.1
Amount: $
(XX) Retention. If this space is checked, then notwithstanding other provisions to the contrary
requiring the payment of compensation to the Consultant sooner. the City shall be entitled
to retain. at their option. either the following "Retention Percentage" or "Retention
Amount" until the City determines that the Retention Release Event, listed below. has
occurred :
(XX) Retention Percentage: 10%
( ) Retention Amount: $
Retention Release Event:
(XX) Completion of All Consultant Services
( ) Other:
Attachments:
Scope of Work
Davy2PTY.ExA
June 8, 1995
Page 8
9.; ;JtJ
Scope of Work
Ofpnllllllonal M...... with Pub Md RtoNIIIon Department
K.y pMIoIfHII* Md their 101M
00r6m prog~ gu\dIIIrw.
....1ew budg.t
ArMwwwal tchIIdule
DltcuM enr orIllcIiIleeu..
ObtaIn aIty projKt Informdon: ~. tDpo'.. No
1nItI_... ~poIt
PrOllrMI..1ng ~
M..t with Planning Commlbt
.....p_ dndllHVllllWI'IlWnlllv.
D1_~ dndl.,d eoftoll c:omrnen1ll
....~ In" buldllllllHVlllralll n budget
......nt bUlldlnglHVlllralll to D1rtClOr cI P.u .nd RecrNllon tor approval
Conoepl
ClrHll8 dMIgn wIlh c:ommunlly groups, end ,.~nlllllv..tom
the '.-tc & RecrHlfon Commlltlon.
Qty DetlQn ~ Board. .nd CIty Counoll
Revw blIIIding ay.mt
Dev.1op bullcl1ngl)Atmt =It
P"ttnt conOtpt d"lgn Irld prtlmlMrY OUMtIvc:tion ooat to:
Pwk a Rtchdon CornmINlon.
Qty Dnl;n Review BoIird MCI CIty Caunoll
InItIllla gndnll dttign
StIrt Wily 0.- b "?1lii coordlNdlon
RawIv.epplOVlllto proceed Into o..Ign o.vtIopment (lNII dMlgn)
Dt.1gn o.vtlopment
Refine ..II ct.td dttI;n for cleYtlopment
Stltcl1lnlll building..,...,.. end n .. rI.
Gen.,. S.....nent cI Prclb,bN CoIlIIIuclIon eo.t
InIlIlIIt Itnd-.pt ct.Ign
"-nt tInIiI dttIgn Md c:onatruotIon COlt, elD. to:
Pwk & RtcnIIIIon Comrmelon.
CIty on.un A8vIBw Bon n CI\' Council
FIMIzt UlIIly D8pertmtnt rtqUHt....... n
1Ubmltpe.w. neOtT -y
~'" _W11 tll procI.d Into ConIlrucIIon Dooumtnt Pn..
f-J/
rV1Y-26-'95 11.64 IP;ti<!L. Ut-f.)Y t1'W~.. 1t:.L- J'-J.CJ.;r-'-J{;;;}--V"'t'""t~
eon.truGtlon ~
G..,.,. II'lIII oonlrw;t ckIoumenll (pIInI nI apecIIIoIIIaI_)
o.n.... .wcturIII.1T1eCIhIricIII. .ecllrIcIl ...... -lie
Reh Stldarnent of Prat..bl. ConAuc:IIon Coet
8lAxn1t,..,. for Bullclng o..,MtrIlllIlt__
~ In ol*lnln; Burdlng o..-...oIIItllgn-or.
8lAxn1t... plenl/alloUIIdIOIlI to MY neo. T" .. "lI UtlIlty
Depar1ment
Blddln;
CIIlrIbuIlI pIMa Md IPIDIIIcIIlIon.
I'l"Fo."'ld tD -........... .-Bone
.....If nee IIIIIV. MY llcldenda
AtllInd a bidd.,.... quellllorV'M_nwetlng
AMIot In ClClNln.Idlon -...-t Prepal",
AtllInd bid opening
""'II In ~ of bid IWfUIta
eon,tructlon Adllllnlatra1lon
AII.nd pra-oonslrucllon cornrenC4l
ProvId.12 hoUlll per_k(llYerII8o) ConolrullllonAlhIrM.dI.. SeNt_for .l:l.moult. porlod
durin; ooMlruclion .. toIowt:
AtIIlnd WMkIy job . vIoIto
Pr_ thop drawing., eubmltlU Md tIIlb11ll11ot1ono
RMpondto conlraGlor'. NquOItfor 1.11\"........,
Prooou oontnlclor'o pay ~
ProYld. ob..rvllllon by qullllled IllIII .ng~ and lIlY
.,.~ 1010 tQlIng
PrcMdo ooneuIlaIIon .nd ~ce cUing conatrul:tion
P,.,.. dIlIl1Icallone .. -1IaIY
Mako llnallnopllCt/on Md p,.... puncIIllat
Prwpere ".-built' drawlng.
AaclltwllllplOjeelclouout
7~J:2...
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
You are required to file a Statement of Disclosure of certain ownership or financial interests, payments, or campaign
contributions, on all matters which will require discretionary action on the part of the City Council, Planning Commission, and
nil other official bodies. The following information must be disclosed:
1. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the property which is the subject of the application or the
Contract, e.g., owner, applicant, Contractor, subcontractor, material supplier.
McKinlev Davv Architects
Pedro Medina'
Lopez. Solorio & Associates
John Knotzen & Associates
Fashandi Associates
Construction Analvsts
2. If any person" identified pursuant to (1) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all individuals owning
more than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partnership interest in the partnership.
Eric Davv. John McKinlev
John Knutzen
JoAnne Schiller. Richard Sindelar
3. If any person" identified pursuant to (I) above is non.profit organization or a trust, list the names of am' pcrson
serving as director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or heneficiary or trustor of the trust.
NiA
4 Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of the City staff, Boards. Commissions,
Committees, and Council within the pasttwe!ve month" Yes _ No ..x.. If yes. please indicate person(s):
5. Please identify each and every person, including any agents, employees, consultants. or independent ContraC1\,rs \\ho
you have assigned to represent you before the City in this mailer.
Eric D~\"v
John McKinlev
Kurt Hunker
6. Have you and/or your officers or agents, in the aggregate, contributed more than $1,000 to a Council member in the
current or preceding election period? Yes _ No ..x.. If yes, stille which Council members(s):
. . . (NOTE: AlIached additional pages a
Date:
(a,
o
,,'
1')-
Signat re of Contra
I
McKinl v Da, ' Architects
Print or type name of ContractorlAppli ant
II: Persoll is defined as: "Any illdh'iduol, finn, co-partnership, joint "enlure, association, social cluh, fratema! or~alli:alioll,
corporation, eSlate, trust, reeth'er, syndicate, this and any other counl)', cil)' or counl,)', cily municipality, districI, or other political
suhdil'ision, or any other group or comhination acting as a unit.
9::?3 / 1~ 3+
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item ) il
Meeting Date 6/20/95
ITEM TITLE:
R I. 1793{J . 'F' k D' I d ..
eso utlon approvmg a contract lor lrewor s ISp ay, an entenng mto
an Indemnification Agreement with the San Diego Unified Port District
D;","", of PM'" 'M '4"i;o~q'
City Manag~ ~~ (4/5ths Vote:_No.,U
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
The City is in the process of finalizing plans for the Fourth of July Fireworks display to be conducted
on the Chula Vista Bayfront. A contract with the vendor supplying and launching the fireworks has been
finalized, and the City has been asked to enter into an Indemnification Agreement with the San Diego
Unified Port District as part of their Tidelands Activity Permit.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the resolution and authorize the Mayor to execute a
contract with San Diego Fireworks, Inc. for the 1995 fireworks display and to enter into an
Indemnification Agreement with the San Diego Unified Port District.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: N/A
DISCUSSION: The Fourth of July Fireworks display will be held on the Bayfront on Tuesday, July 4,
1995. The display is scheduled to commence promptly at 9:00 PM, and will last approximately 20-25
minutes. San Diego Fireworks, Inc. was selected to provide the fireworks display again this year through
a competitive bid process conducted by the City's Purchasing Agent. A Request for Proposals was
mailed to four (4) fireworks vendors in mid-March. Only one vendor, San Diego Fireworks, responded
to the RFP. A contract for their services, which includes indemnification language, is attached
(Attachment "A "). San Diego Fireworks has provided the City with impressive shows for the Fourth of
July event, as well as the Symphony Pops finale, for a number of years.
The fireworks will be launched from a barge anchored in San Diego Bay, west of the City's bayfront
development. The show will once again be accompanied by a radio simulcast on a local radio station
(KYXY). KYXY is providing $1,000 worth of additional fireworks to augment the City's purchase, and
they will be providing a substantial amount of free pre-show publicity as well.
The Police Department, Traffic Engineering Division, and Transit Division are coordinating plans to
relieve the anticipated traffic congestion that normally occurs in the area throughout the day. Traffic
control will be handled by the Police Department according to a traffic plan designed by the Traffic
Engineering Division. A centralized command post will be established at the corner of "J" Street and
Marina Parkway so that Police, Fire, and other personnel involved with the event will know where
contact can be made in the event of any unforseen problems or emergencies.
The Transit Division will again be offering free shuttle bus service into and out of the area from all city
trolley stations. Shuttle busses will utilize special express traffic lanes that will be established exclusively
for shuttle bus use and emergency traffic.
Ug:AI13:FRWKA 113.95:6-]4-951
1
/tJ~/
Item / P
Meeting Date 6/20/95
The advertising for the event, utilizing transit bus ads, paid advertising, and multi-media press releases,
is being coordinated by the City's Public Information Coordinator.
Since the event will be taking place on Port District property, the San Diego Unified Port District has
been contacted concerning the event. The City and the fireworks vendor are required to provide the Port
with Certificates of Insurance naming the Port as additional insured. In addition, the Port's Tideland
Activity Permit (Attachment "B") contains an Indemnification Agreement. The City has entered into
Indemnification Agreements with the fireworks vendor and the Port for a number of years as part of the
planning process for Fourth of July events and the Symphony Pops Concerts.
It should be noted that the Port District Activity Permit gives the Port Authority right to a 24-hour
cancellation notice, which, if exercised, would terminate the fireworks display, and could result in the
loss of several contract fees. Such a cancellation is highly unlikely, although a serious emergency in the
area could result is such a cancellation.
It should also be noted that the contract with San Diego Fireworks contains a provision that allows the
contractor to cancel the event if weather conditions are unfavorable for launching the aerial display. The
City would be responsible for paying the contractor 10% ($1,873) of the total contract price for
restocking fees, technicians fees, and permit and insurance costs. However, the City would not be
responsible for these costs if an alternative date for the display was agreed upon prior to 9:00 AM on July
Fourth.
FISCAL IMPACT: $27,510 has been allocated in the 1994-95 Non-Departmental budget for this event:
Fireworks Contract
Traffic Control Equipment - Rental
Portable Toilets - Rental
Trash Receptacles/Dumpster - Rental
Shuttle Bus Service - Chula Vista Transit
Police Services
Parks Division Services
$18,725
340
1,150
200
700
6,000
----.W
$27,510
Attachments
nAil
Contract with San Diego Fireworks, Inc.
Activity Permit - San Diego Unified Port District
liB"
Ijg;Al13:FRWKA 113.95:6-14-951
2
/jJ.;~
RESOLUTION NO.
/7'130
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING A CONTRACT FOR FIREWORKS
DISPLAY FOR JULY 4, 1995 AND ENTERING INTO AN
INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN WITH THE SAN
DIEGO UNIFIED PORT DISTRICT
WHEREAS, Parks and Recreation staff is finalizing plans
for the annual Fourth of July Fireworks display to be conducted on
the Chula vista Bayfront; and
WHEREAS, a contract with the vendor supplying and
launching the fireworks has been finalized, and the city has been
asked to enter into an Indemnification Agreement with the San Diego
Unified Port District as part of their Tidelands Activity Permit;
and
WHEREAS, staff recommends that Council adopt the
resolution authorizing the Mayor to execute a contract with San
Diego Fireworks and to enter into an indemnification agreement with
the San Diego Unified Port District.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of
the City of Chula vista does hereby approve and authorize the Mayor
to execute an Agreement between with San Diego Fireworks, Inc. and
the City of Chula vista for the annual Fourth of July Fireworks
display to be held on the Chula vista Bayfront on Tuesday, July 4,
1995, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk as
Document No. (to be completed by the City Clerk in the final
document) .
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council approves and
authorizes the Mayor to execute a Tideland Activity Permit from the
San Diego Unified Port District, a copy of which is on file in the
office of the city Clerk.
Presented by
A
or~~
Jess Valenzuela, Director of
Parks and Recreation
Bruce M.
, City Attorney
C:\rs\fireworks
/J-:J 110- i'l
FIREWORKS DISPLAY AGREEMENT
THIS AGREEMENT, entered into this day of June,
1995, by and between the City of Chula Vista, a California
Municipal Corporation, hereinafter called "City", and San
Diego Fireworks, Inc., a California Corporation, hereinafter
called "Contractor", is made with reference to the following
facts:
WIT N E SSE T H:
WHEREAS, City desires to provide a fireworks display
for its residents on July 4, 1995, and Contractor desires to
furnish the fireworks display to said City;
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS AGREED BETWEEN THE PARTIES HERETO
AS FOLLOWS:
1. SCOPE OF WORK.
Contractor agrees to furnish to City, on July 4,
1995, in the San Diego Bay, on a barge west of the Chula
Vista Marina, in accordance with the terms and conditions
hereinafter set forth, one (1) Fireworks Display as set
forth in Program "A", attached hereto as Exhibit "A",
incorporated herein and made a part hereof as though set
forth in full, including all required tug and barge
services, required picket boat security around launch site,
and the services of one (1) licensed pyrotechnician to take
charge of and fire the Display with sufficient helpers.
1.1 Contractor's Duty to Provide Suitable Launch Site.
Contractor shall furnish and provide at their own
expense, a barge as a suitable launch site. Suitability of
any proposed barge is to be determined solely by Contractor,
as long as the City agrees that there is adequate public
access for viewing and adequate parking. Contractor shall
furnish and provide, at their own expense, suitable barge
floats or scows, including provisions for towing and
handling of same. The services and operations of Contractor
are considered complete when the crew and equipment of
Contractor depart the site.
2. Cancellation by Contractor. In the event Contractor
reasonably determines the weather conditions are unfavorable
on the date set for the display, City shall pay Contractor
ten percent (10%) of the contract price as a restocking fee
for materials and as contribution to costs incurred by
Contractor for technician fees, and permit and insurance
costs.
{jg:fwkcontr. 9S: 6 -14- 95]
1
/j)~5.
3. Cancellation by City. Should City decide to cancel the
display, notice shall be given to Contractor no later than
nine o'clock A.M. on the day of the display. City shall pay
Contractor ten percent (10%) of the contract price as a
restocking fee and as contribution to costs incurred by
Contractor including, but not limited to, technician fees,
and permit and insurance costs.
4. postponement. In the event of cancellation by Contrac-
tor as provided in Paragraph 2 herein, or cancellation by
City as provided in paragraph 3 herein, City shall not be
liable to pay Contractor ten percent (10%) of the contract
price as a restocking fee or any costs incurred by
Contractor if the City tenders to Contractor another date
for the display prior to 9:00 A.M. on the day of the
display. City shall be liable only for the expenses
incurred by Contractor due to the postponement if the
parties have agreed upon a postponement date, or the City
has tendered a reasonable postponement date.
5. ASSUMPTION OF RISK FOR WEATHER RUINING EXHIBITS.
City agrees to assume the risk of damage to the Exhibit
by weather or other causes beyond the control of Contractor,
which may affect or damage such portion of the exhibits as
must be placed in position and exposed a necessary time
before the scheduled commencement of the Display. By
assuming said risk, City agrees to pay for Contractor's cost
of said destroyed or ruined exhibits, unless the City is
otherwise obligated to pay the Contractor the compensation
required by this agreement.
6. DISPLAY PROTECTION.
Contractor shall arrange for and provide at their
expense adequate police or security around the fireworks
launch site to prevent the public from entering the areas
designated solely by the Contractor for the firing of the
display and fallout areas. Any vehicles or vessels or
personal property within these areas shall be removed at the
expense of City. Any damage to personal property and
injuries or death to persons remaining within these areas,
and in areas affected by fallout from the display, shall be
the sole responsibility and liability of Contractor.
Contractor shall indemnify, defend and hold harmless City
against such claims as provided in paragraph eight (8)
herein. City shall be responsible and liable for any damage
or theft of equipment or materials of Contractor caused by
the public.
{jg: fwkcontr. 95: 6 -14 - 95]
2
)/J-c;
7. INSURANCE.
Contractor, shall, throughout the duration of this
Agreement, maintain the following insurance coverage:
7.1 Commercial General Liability' Insurance including
Business automobile liability insurance in the amount
of $1,000,000, combined single limit, which names the
City of Chula Vista as additional insured and is
primary to any insurance policy carried by the City.
7.2 Errors and omissions insurance in the amount of
$250,000.
7.3. Statutory Worker's Compensation Insurance and
Employer's Liability Insurance in the amount of
$1,000,000.
All policies shall be issued by a carrier that has a
Best's Rating of "A-", Class "V", or better or shall meet
with the approval of the City's Risk Manager.
Contractor shall provide, prior to commencement of the
services required under this Agreement, certificates of
insurance for the coverage required in this section, and,
for Commercial General Liability Insurance, a policy
endorsement for the City and Port as additional insured; a
policy endorsement stating the Contractor's insurance is
primary and a policy endorsement stating that the limits of
insurance apply separately to each project away from
premises owned or rented by the Contractor. Certificates of
insurance must also state that each policy may not be
canceled without at least thirty (30) days written notice to
the City.
The provisions of this section are intended to be of
benefit only to the City, and not for the advantage or
benefit of any third party. The City shall have the sole
right to insist upon or waive their performance without
liability to any third party.
8. HOLD HARMLESS.
8.1 City's Indemnity. City shall indemnify, defend
and hold Contractor harmless and the property of Contractor
from and against any and all claims, losses, damages, suits,
injuries and liabilities arising from the death or injury to
any person or from damage to or destruction of any property,
which arises out of, or is caused by an act, omission,
negligence or misconduct on the part of City or any of
City's elected officials, officers, agents, servants,
employees, contractors, guests, invitees or licensees. The
fjg: fwkcontr. 9S: 6-14 -95J
3
/tl-7
provisions of this section shall not apply to any claim or
liability arising by reason 0= the sole negligence, gross
negligence or willful misconduct of Contractor.
8.2. Contractor's Indemnity. Contractor shall
indemnify, defend and hold harmless City and the property of
City from and against any and all claims, losses, damages,
suits, injuries and liabilities arising from the death or
injury to any person or from damage to or destruction of any
property, which arises out of or is caused by an act,
omission, negligence or misconduct on the part of Contractor
or any of Contractor's officers, agents, servants,
employees, contractors, guests, invitees or licensees. The
provisions of this section shall not apply to any claim or
liability arising by reason of the sole negligence, gross
negligence or willful misconduct of City.
9. COMPENSATION.
City agrees to pay Contractor the sum of Eighteen
Thousand Seven Hundred Twenty Five ($18,725.00) dollars
according to the following terms and conditions, due and
payable as follows: Fifty (50%) percent deposit upon
execution of this agreement, and the balance due ten (10)
days after date of Display, plus one (1%) percent service
charge on accounts over thirty (30) days past due.
10. ATTORNEY'S FEES AND COSTS.
This contract shall be governed by the laws of the
State of California. Should any legal action be brought to
enforce or interpret the terms or provisions of this
agreement, any court of competent jurisdiction located in
the County of San Diego, California shall be proper venue
for an action. If any legal action is brought to enforce or
interpret the terms or provisions of this agreement, the
prevailing party shall be entitled to reasonable attorney's
fees and costs in addition to any other relief to which they
may be entitled.
11. PARTIES INDEPENDENCE.
It is further agreed that nothing in this Agreement
shall be construed as forming a partnership, the Parties
hereto being severally responsible for their own separate
debts and obligations, and neither Party shall be held
responsible for any agreements not stipulated in this
Agreement.
[jg: fwkcontr. 95: 6-14 -95J
4
/t1 ~ g/
12. NOTICE TO PARTIES.
Any Notice to Parties required under this Agreement to
be given to either party may be given by deposition in the
United States mail, postage prepaid, first class, a notice
addressed to the following:
City:
City of Chula Vista
Attn: Beverly Authelet, City Clerk
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, California 91910
Contractor:
San Diego Fireworks, Inc.
P.O. Box 900186
San Diego, CA 92190
13 . SUCCESSORS.
The terms, conditions and payments of this Agreement
shall be binding upon the Parties themselves and on their
heirs, executors, administrators, successors and assigns.
14. ENTIRE AGREEMENT
All terms of this Agreement are in writing and may only
be modified by written Agreement of the Parties hereto.
Both Parties acknowledge they have received a copy of said
written Agreement and agree to be bound by said terms of
written agreement only.
[jg: fwkcontr. 95: 6 -14- 95]
5
/;:J-~
I.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the Parties hereto, by and through
their duly authorized agents, have set their hands and seals
as of the day and year first above written.
City of Chula Vista,
A Municipal Corporation.
by:
Shirley Horton, Mayor
ATTEST:
Beverly Authelet, City Clerk
(SEAL)
z:~~~
City Attorney
~
San Diego Fireworks, Inc.,
a California Corporation
By
David L. Bain
General Manager
Ijg: fwkcontr. 95: 6-14-95]
6
j(J-)/J
E."'~\l!.\T A
ATTACHMENT A-7
BILL OF MATERIALS
PREPARED FOR
City of Chuls Vista
July 4,1995
Program A
AERIAL FIREWORKS DISPLAY:
60 3" Assorted Brilliant Color Aerial Shells
SO 3" Assorted Fancy Pattern and Multiple Color Aerial Shells
40 3" Assorted Oriental Floral Pattern Aerial Shells
30 3" Assorted Special Effects Aerial Shells
25 3" Assorted Deluxe Special Effect Aerial Shells
45 4" Assorted Brilliant Color Aerial Shells
35 4" Assorted Fancy Pattern and Multiple Color Aerial Shells
30 4" Assorted Oriental Floral Pattern Aerial Shells
20 4" Assorted Special Effects Aerial Shells
15 4" Assorted Deluxe Special Effect Aerial Shells
37 S" Assorted Brilliant Color Aerial Shells
28 S" Assorted Fancy Pattern and Multiple Color Aerial Shells
20 S" Assorted Oriental Floral Pattern Aerial Shells
7 S" Assorted Special Effects Aerial Shells
6 S" Assorted Deluxe Special Effect Aerial Shells
20 6" Assorted Brilliant Color Aerial Shells
16 6" Assorted Fancy Pattern and Multiple Color Aerial Shells
13 6" Assorted Oriental Floral Pattern Aerial Shells
Page 1
/17-//
6
6
5
4
6"
8"
8"
8"
3
8"
Attachment A-8
BILL OF MATERIALS
PREPARED FOR
City of Chula Vista
July 4,1995
Program A
Assorted Special Effects Aerial Shells
Assorted Brilliant Color Aerial Shells
Assorted Fancy Pattem and Multiple Color Aerial Shells
Assorted Oriental Floral Pattem Aerial Shells
Assorted Special Effects Aerial Shells
Assorted Fancy Pattern and Multiple Color Aerial Shells
Assorted Oriental Floral Pattern Aerial Shells
Assorted Special Effects Aerial Shells
Assorted Fancy Pattern and Multiple Color Aerial Shells
Assorted Oriental Floral Pattern Aerial Shells
Assorted Special Effects Aerial Shells
GRAND AERIAL FINALE:
100 2.5" Brilliant Color Aerial Finale Shells
140 3" Aerial Titanium Flash Salutes
140 3" Assorted Brilliant Color Aerial Finale Shells
40 4" Assorted Brilliant Color Aerial Finale Shells
1 12" Special Pattern Aerial Finale Shell
2
10"
2
2
10"
Total Shells in Display: 951
10"
12"
1
1
12"
1
12"
Page 2
/iJ-/.-2.
ATTACHMENT B-1
SAN DIEGO UNIFIED PORT DISTRICT
TIDELAND ACTIVITY PERMIT
PERMIlTEE: City of Chula Vista
USE OR ACTIVITY: Fourth of July Fireworks Disolav
LOCATION FOR WHICH PERMIT ISSUED: Chub Vista Bavfront
EFFECTIVE DATES: ':rUL.'1
..,.. 11'1 S-
.
SECURITY DEPOSIT:~/A
THIS PERMIT FOR TIDELAND USE IS ISSUED SUBJECT TO THE FOLLOWING
TERMS AND CONDITIONS:
1. P.rmltt.e .hall comply with all applicable laws, rul.. and r.gulatlons of
the DI.trlct and oth.r gov.rnm.ntal .ntlti.s.
2. P.rmltt.e .hall k.ep the property and III .qulpm.nt u..d In connection
with this p.rmlt In a cl.an. .afe and .anltary mann.r Ind In good r.palr at III
tlm... Allor any portion of the ..curlty d.po.lt ahall be Ivallable
unconditionally to the DI.trlct for the purpo.. of cl.anlng or repairing
damages to the property upon t.rmlnltlon of thl. p.rmlt.
3. Thl. permit may be clnc.lI.d by .Ith.r party by the giving of tw.nty.four
(24) hou~ notic. In writing to the oth.r party. Such canc.llatlon aha II be
without liability of any natur..
4. Thl. permit ahall not be tranaf.rr.d or ...Igned.
I. Permltte. .hall d.fend,lnd.mnlfy, and hold harm I... Dlatrlct, Ita offlc.r.
end employe.. ISlaln.t I" cau... of action, for Judlclll relief of any kind, for
dlmlg. to property of Iny kind whatao.v.r, Ind to whomever .-.Ionglng,
including Permittee, or Injury to or delth of any peraon or peraona,lncludlng
.mploy... of Permltt.., ,..ultlng dlr.ctly or Indlr.ctly from actlvltl.. In
conn.ctlon with the I..uanc. and performance of thl. permit or arl.lng from
the ua. of the property, facllltl.. or a.rvlc.. of D1.trlct, Ita offlc.,. or
.mploy....
/~ -/3
ATTACHMENT B-2
6. Permittee shill mllntaln comprehensive public IIlblllty (covering
operations, produc~ and completed operations) and blanket contractual
coverage Insurlnce throughout the term of this permit. The policies Shill, as
a minimum, provide the following forms of coverage:
$1 Million combined single limit
(A) Per,onallnjury and Bodily Injury:
One Person .
One Occurrence .
(B) Property Dlmlge .
Certlficetes of luch Insurance, In a form satlsflctory to the District, Ihall be
filed with District', Community Relations Department. Insurance certificates
filed pursuant to this permit Ihall contain I non-cancellation-wlthout-notice
clluse and shall provide that copies of cancelllUon notices shill be lent to
the District.
7. The rlgh~ and privileges extended by this permit are non-excluslve.
8. Permittee shall not engage In any activity on property of tha District other
than the activity for which this permit Is expressly IHued.
8. Permittee shall be subject to and comply with any speclll conditions
attached hereto.
10. Permittee shill comply with all requlremen~ and directives of the Port
Director of District.
11. In the event of failure of Permittee to comply with any provision of this
permit, this permit mlY, It the discretion of the Port Director, be terminated
Immediately.
SAN DIEGO UNIFIED PORT DISTRICT
Approved:
Permittee hereby accep~ this permit and agrees to comply with all the terms and
condlUons thereof.
Permlttee'l Ilgnlture
Addre.s:
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Ave.
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Telephone: John Gates - 585-6617 fari an Cox - 691-5140
III
/tJ -;,/
OlIte request rec8ved
in CR Dept.:
ATTACHMENT B-3
PI..se comDlete ..ch Item below.
1. Sponsoring individual or group:
City of Chula Vista
2. Address and telephone number of contact person:
John Gates - 585-5617; Brian Cox - 691-5140
City of Chula Vista
Parks and Recreation Department
276 Fourth Ave.
Chula Vista, CA 91910
3. What type of event is planned?
Fireworks Display
<4. Where exactly on the bayfront?
Fireworks _ Spectators on bayfront between "F" and "J" Street
Fireworks launched from barge in Bay
5. Day and date of event:
TVE."b"'~
,
6. Time: Start
-:Iu~"i ~ I \'\'\ 5
8:00 a.m. Finish
10:00 p.m.
7. Will traffic be affected?
Yes, Chula Vista Police Department will provide traffic control in the
area throughout the day
B. How many persons expected to attend?
~O,OOO - 25,000
9. If large group, what security arrangements have been made?
Chula Vista Police Department will provide security and crowd control
throughout the event .
10. If commerc::i8I or c:atwed ~ do you have liability Insurance coverag;?
N/A
Plea.. I'IIIum thil Clhecklill (wtlhin 10 WOIking days) or your Nquell for an _nt on Port tidelandl will be
__led.
4W3
JjJ./~/ 10- 1l{J
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item / /
Meeting Date 6/20/95
I. /79 J / .
Reso utlon Approvmg Uncontrolled Embankment Agreement for
fill at 75 North Broadway (~~/ Plaza)
Director of Public Works [r
Ci~ Mam,g':ft ~ (4/5 Vo", V~_ No-X.J
Gatlin Development Company, co-owner of property comprising the future Broadway Plaza
Shopping Center (WaIMart), has requested that grading work, currently authorized under grading
permit number PG-528, be designated as uncontrolled embankment.
ITEM TITLE:
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
Municipal Code Section 15.04.285 states that uncontrolled embankment agreements must be
approved by City Council and recorded by the City Clerk in the office of the County Recorder
as an obligation of the land involved. This limitation will, therefore, appear in future title
reports in order to notify property buyers.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the resolution, authorize the Mayor to sign the
agreement on behalf of the City and direct the City Clerk to record the resolution and
agreement.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: N/A
DISCUSSION:
Gatlin Development Company acquired a valid permit to perform grading in the wetlands,
adjacent to the western side of the shopping center site (see Exhibit "A"), as a mitigation
measure required by the Environmental Impact Report. The grading permit number is PG-528.
In a letter to the City Engineer, Gatlin Development Company requested that fill, originally
intended to be completed by permit number PG-528, be designated as an uncontrolled
embankment due to prohibitive site conditions. The letter states that special compaction
procedures would have to be implemented to meet the minimum specifications for soil
compaction as required by the grading ordinance, "Green Book" of Standard Specifications, and
common engineering practice. Further stated, such procedures would be impractical due to
extensive disturbance to sensitive wetlands.
It is further implied in Gatlin's letter that said specialized compaction operations are cost
prohibitive, since it would require very deep removal and recompaction of existing soils prior
to filling to avoid settlement, as well as supplementary measures to stabilize and reinforce the
fill. Both of these are labor-intensive and materially expensive. Although requisite for a building
foundation, and despite the extreme cost, such measures would be superfluous for a stable,
vegetated wetland embankment.
The geotechnical engineer-of-work for the project informed staff that the depth required to reach
firm, consolidated soil, is on the average of 45 feet, based on the data for the adjacent building
I/,!
Page 2, Item / I
Meeting Date 6/20/95
pads area. The depth of removal includes a sandy layer which has a great probability for soil
liquefaction, an instability resulting from strong ground motions, such as seismic activity. The
extensive depth, coupled with a high water table for the area might involve excavation beyond
the fill boundaries to shore the site for workers' safety. The excavation to reach firm soil is,
itself, additional disturbance of the already disturbed wetland.
The alternative proposed by the geotechnical engineer-of-work is a relative compaction of 80 to
85 percent as opposed to the 90 percent required by the City. 80 to 85 percent compaction is
similar to that of soil before it is graded. The level of compaction would be stable at the
proposed 3: 1 slopes, and would provide slightly less density, better suited for planting
vegetation. Staff will require the developer, Gatlin Development Company, to adhere to its
consultant's recommendation that maximum relative compaction be strived for by conventional
fill placement procedures. The uncontrolled embankment is placed within the area reserved for
preserving existing wetland, and in spite of compaction requirements, the embankment was
needed to mitigate the effects of the shopping center development. No other deviation from the
approved plans is expected.
All grading operations associated with the request for uncontrolled embankment will be required
to conform to accepted engineering practices.
The purpose of an uncontrolled embankment agreement is to serve notice to future purchasers
or successors to the property that grading operations did not meet the City's minimum
specifications for compaction, thereby making fill placed under permit number PG-528 an
uncontrolled embankment, in compliance with the Municipal Code definition. Such a site could
not be used as a foundation for future building or development.
Approval of the agreement is conditioned as follows:
1. The fill deposited shall be designated as an uncontrolled embankment and constructed per
the approved grading plan and grading permit.
2. The developer acknowledges that the uncontrolled embankment site is not eligible for a
building permit.
3. The uncontrolled embankment work shall be constructed and maintained in a safe and
sanitary manner at the cost of the owners or their successors in interest.
The owners have executed their portion of the agreement, and the grading plan was approved.
FISCAL IMPACT:
An additional deposit for processing the request has been added to the existing account for
permit PG-528, but the overall financial impact to the City or the Shopping Center is minimal.
If, however, the uncontrolled embankment permit were not issued, the developer would be
required to spend an additional unknown, but extensive, amount to comply with the grading
ordinance requirements. The developer will reimburse the City out of the deposit account for
all engineering review and inspections activities. Thus, there is no direct fiscal impact to the
City.
Attachments:
Exhibit A - Map
Exhibit B - Letter from Gatlin
/1-.2..
JGA:PH'()12
[M, 1H000IENGlNEERIAOBNDA\WALMART,MAPj
RESOLUTION NO. ) '}9 J /
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING UNCONTROLLED EMBANKMENT
AGREEMENT FOR FILL AT 75 NORTH BROADWAY
(BROADWAY PLAZA)
WHEREAS, Gatlin Development Company, co-owner of property
comprising the future Broadway Plaza Shopping Center (WalMart), has
requested that grading work, currently authorized under grading
permit number PG-528, be designated as uncontrolled embankment; and
WHEREAS, Chula vista Municipal Code section 15.04.285
states that uncontrolled embankment agreements must be approved by
City Council and recorded by the City Clerk as an obligation of the
land involved.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the
city of Chula vista does hereby approve an Uncontrolled Embankment
Agreement for fill at 75 North Broadway (Broadway Plaza), a copy of
which is on file in the office of the city Clerk as Document No.
(to be completed by the Clerk in the final document).
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the city of
Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said
Agreement for and on behalf of the City and the City Clerk is
directed to cause same to be recorded. This resolution shall take
effect on the recording of said Agreement with the Count Recorder.
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
"J 0 'O'J)
Presented by
C:\rs\75NBroad.WM
JJ- 3 ! [1-+
-
-
~
-
I-
m
-
I
X
W
~
-
()
.
~
..
'"
.j
~
'II
!$ hI h 1
"I!\J
- I I
!=!jlj! !
. ili.lh I I
c
1 N 1
i
!
,
I
Iv
I
~
I
J I '.
~ Ii ~ I ~ ~
i:2 ~ 1 ~ :j
~ I.. ~ !
~ 'j II ' I
C'.i II I ~
~ jl I!~,
[/) I '~
;;1 i'~'
~I
5 i
I
I'!
I
,
d !
Ii ill
, pi <
L.~_~
-1' ~
Ii
.ill
' ll~
! !1I1
I
I.
I it
II
11
, :J
L
j.;1
, :
/'
\\
"
,
,
~~~~/ ~,
1'1
"
,
,
,
,
,
.f'~
t',
,l..
Iii.
'-,
l:ii
;;;!
"
"
f
.'
.'~
j
!i~~
! .~!!
!-'!
II ll:,
I ;l:l
~I! i;,1
I i ~.: ~
~.~o
!! ~~~J:
Ii'" ' ~~
R ~~ ~~~
II p~
, I~ ;1 d:
~, ~( "['
~ "~ : Q
~ hi t-"
~f .~!
;~ :~~
,. "!'
~~ ;!ilo.
II'!
. 'I
I,
,
l
,
31
! ."j
, ~~1~
~ 0
, '
,
-'
1:
;;j
9-9->-4'?d
~1 I
I
~
April 13, 1995
G:iD
GATLIN DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
[,chAp; t B
~".tJa~<
..... r--,
: .., .~~
~ ~ .
$.
~~
<}
~~
0, 68lgr
City of Chula Vista
Engineering Department
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, Ca. 91910
Attention:
Cliff Swanson, City Engineer
RE: Request for Change of Grading Permit (y{.O. No. PG-528) to Uncontrolled Embankment
We hereby request a change of the grading permit for W.O. No. PG-528 to an uncontrolled embankment permit
per Section 15.04.050(8) and Section 15.04.285 of the Chula Vista Grading Ordinance Number 1797.
We initiate this request of change to an uncontrolled embankment due to the following site conditions:
Placement and compaction to grade a compacted fill embankment for the wetlands (non-structural fill)
area will be impractical, requiring extensive removals within the existing saturated soils prior to filling.
This extensive disturbance to sensitive wetlands will not be allowed by the agencies. It is anticipated
that conventional fill placement procedures should achieve a soil compaction of 80 to 85 percent relative
density. All embankment slopes are planned for a maximum inclination of 3: I (horizontal:vertieal).
Therefore, gross slope stability will not be an issue. The face of slopes will be track-walked and
vegetated to mitigate surficial slope instability.
Since this grading permit is for the enhancement of a wetlands area we will prohibit the future construction of
buildings on this site. We know that the specified vegetation will grow beller at this reduced compaction level.
We wlderstand that the gcned characteristic of the uncontrolled embankment permit is the noticing feature that
helps to protect the city and all future owners of the property.
If you have any questions or comments regarding this request please call.
~
~t;})
V ice President
Design/Construction
ce:
Brian Faraci, Nasland Engineering
John Elliott, Gatlin Development
David Leake, Geoeon Inc.
PG-528
PI-I-O/Z
]2()2,) High 1,31 u Il" Dri\'t' . Sui(t' 5(Jij. S;lll Dit'bO,
C\WI'W[N60\WPtxlCSICIIULA VISIGRPERMn'L TIl.
(::di(urni,l l)21.Hl . ((l I ()) j(J.)-2t)'){) . bx (() 19) 7lJ3-0H I 0
I)-It
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
ITEM TITLE:
Item ))...
Meeting Date 6/20/95
Resolution / 79 .J~ccePting Bids and Awarding Contract for the
"Bonita Road Widening Between Plaza Bonita Road and 1-805 in the City
of Chula Vista, CA (STM-312)"
SUBMITTED BY:
Director of Public Wor
REVIEWED BY: City Manager~ b ..-"'/ (4/5ths Vote: Yes_NoX)
At 2:00 p.m. on June 7, 1995, in Conference Room 3 in the Public Services Building, the
Director of Public Works received sealed bids for "Bonita Road Widening Between Plaza Bonita
Road and 1-805 in the City of Chula Vista, CA (STM-312)." The work to be done includes
removal and disposal of existing improvements, excavation and grading, asphalt concrete
pavement, monolithic curb, gutter, and sidewalk, storm drain and other miscellaneous work
shown on the plans.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the subject resolution accepting bids and
awarding contract to Castello, Inc. in the amount of $385,936 contingent upon approval of the
1995/96 CIP budget.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
Funds for this project are budgeted in the FY 1995-96 Capital Improvement Program. The
Bonita road widening and drainage improvements will streamline accessibility for vehicles
entering and exiting the adjacent Interstate 805, and enhance turning movement safety for
vehicles entering and exiting businesses on the north and south sides of Bonita Road within the
limits of the project.
Bids were received from 7 contractors as follows:
Contractor Base Bid Amount
1. Castello, Inc., Escondido $ 385,936.00
2. Carolyn E. Scheidel., La Mesa $ 397,671.00
3. L.R. Hubbard Inc., San Diego $ 415,860.91
4. Marquez Con. Inc., San Diego $ 437,712.00
5. Interwest Pacific, Ltd., San Diego $ 443,792.36
6. Sapper Con., San Diego $ 483,268.00
7. Daley Corp., San Diego $ 550,113.50
I,) -)
Page 2, Item 1.2.
Meeting Date 6/20/95
The low bid by Castello, Inc. is below the engineer's estimate of $456,785.00 by $70,849.00
or by 15.51 %. Castello, Inc. has previously done some work for the city, and their work has
been satisfactory. They recently completed satisfactory work on the Lauderbach park.
Staff has reviewed their references, and verified their license and determined that the contractor
has the relevant experience and resources to complete the project and that the license is in good
standing. We, therefore, recommend that the contract be awarded to Castello, Inc.
Disclosure Statement
Attached is a copy of the contractor's disclosure statement (Exhibit A).
Environmental Status
The Environmental Review Coordinator concluded that there will be no significant environmental
impacts associated with the project and that this project is statutorily exempt under Section
15301, Class I (c) "Existing highways and streets" of the California Environmental Quality Act.
In addition, a Stream Bed Alteration Agreement has been entered into between the Department
of Fish and Game and the City of Chula Vista. The agreement requires the City to provide
mitigation measures to alleviate construction impacts to the site.
Prevailinl! Wage Statement
The source of funding for this project is the City's Development Impact Fees fund. Contractors
bidding this project were not required to pay prevailing wages to persons employed by them for
work under this contract. No special minority or women owned business requirements were
necessary as part of the bid documents. However, disadvantaged businesses were encouraged
to participate and the project was advertised with various minority trade publications per the
City's outreach policy.
Financial Statement
Funds Required for Construction
A. Contract Amount $ 385,936.00
B. Contingencies (10%) 38,593.00
C. Staff (Inspection and Surveying) 38,593.00
TOTAL FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION $ 463,122.00
Funds Available for Construction ,
A. Bonita Road Widening. (STM-312) $ 463,122.00
TOTAL FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION $ 463,122.00
/.2 -d.-
Page 3, Item /2..
Meeting Date 6/20/95
FISCAL IMPACT:
This action will authorize the expenditure of $463,122 from the CIP project STM312. Bonita
Road widening is included in Cycle 5 of the State/Local Transportation Program (SL TPP) known
as SB300. The deadline for award of the project under cycle 5 is June 30, 1995. This program
is anticipated to reimburse the City an amount equal to 19.35 % of the construction cost or
$74,678.62. After construction, only routine city maintenance amounting to annual cleaning will
be required.
Exhibit A:
Disclosure Statement
SA:STM-312
m: \home\engineer\agenda \stm312br. sa
/;2 -.3 / l Z -~
RESOLUTION NO. /79:Ie:<
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BIDS AND AWARDING
CONTRACT FOR THE "BONITA ROAD WIDENING BETWEEN
PLAZA BONITA ROAD AND 1-805 IN THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA, CA. (STM-312)"
WHEREAS, at 2:00 p.m. on June 7, 1995, in Conference Room
3 in the Public Services Building, the Director of PUblic Works
received the following sealed bids for "Bonita Road Widening
Between Plaza Bonita Road and 1-805 in the City of Chula vista, CA
(STM-312)":
Contractor Base Bid Amount
1. Castello, Inc., Escondido $ 385,936.00
2. Carolyn E. Scheidel., La Mesa $ 397,671.00
3. L.R. Hubbard Inc., San Diego $ 415,860.91
4. Marquez Con. Inc., San Diego $ 437,712.00
5. Interwest Pacific, Ltd., San Diego $ 443,792.36
6. Sapper Con., San Diego $ 483,268.00
7. Daley Corp., San Diego $ 550,113.50
WHEREAS, the low bid by Castello, Inc. is below the
engineer's estimate of $456,785.00 by $70,849.00 or by 15.51% and
they have previously done some work for the city on the Lauderbach
Park, and their work has been satisfactory; and
WHEREAS, staff has reviewed their references, and
verified their license and determined that the contractor has the
relevant experience and resources to complete the project and that
the license is in good standing and, therefore, recommends that the
contract be awarded to Castello, Inc.; and
WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator concluded
that there will be no significant environmental impacts associated
with the project and that this project is statutorily exempt under
section 15301, Class 1 (c) "Existing highways and streets" of the
California Environmental Quality Act; and
WHEREAS, in addition, a Stream Bed Alteration Agreement
has been entered into between the Department of Fish and Game and
the city of Chula vista which agreement requires the city to
provide mitigation measures to alleviate construction impacts to
the site; and
1
);t. -5
WHEREAS, the source of funding for this project is the
city's Development Impact Fees fund and contractors bidding this
project were not required to pay prevailing wages to persons
employed by them for work under this contract; and
WHEREAS, no special minority or women owned business
requirements were necessary as part of the bid documents, however,
disadvantaged businesses were encouraged to participate and the
project was advertised with various minority trade publications per
the City'S outreach policy.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, ORDER AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the City Council concurs in the
determination that this project is statutorily exempt under Section
15301, Class l(c) "Existing highways and streets" of the California
Environmental Quality Act, and directs the Environmental Review
Coordinator to file, or ratifies the filing of, a notice of
exemption for this project.
Section 2. That the City Council does hereby accept the
bid of Castello, Inc. as responsive.
Section 3. The City Council awards the contract for the
"Bonita Road Widening between Plaza Bonita Road and 1-805 in the
city of Chula vista" to castello, Inc. in the amount of
$385,936.00, the lowest responsible bidder which submitted a
responsive bid to the approved specifications.
Section 4. The Mayor of the City of Chula vista is
hereby authorized and directed to execute said contract for and on
behalf of the City of Chula vista.
Presented by
form by
1)
, city
John P. Lippitt, Director
of Public Works
C:\rs\bonitard.bid
2
/.2. -t Irz- ~
THE CITY OF CmJLA VISTA DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
You are required to file a Statement of Disclosure of certain ownership or financial interests, payments, or campaign contributions,
on all matters which will require discretionary action on the pan of the City COWICil, Planning Commission, and all other official
bodies. The following information must be disclosed:
I. List the names of all persons having a financial interest in the property which is the subject of the application or the Contract,
e.g., owner, applicant, Contractor, subcontractor, material supplier.
C4,f,e ~<? (,Uc... . c&>~ r~4clD~
,. ,.
2. If any person- identified pursuant to (I) above is a corporation or partnership, list the names of all individuals owning more
than 10% of the shares in the corporation or owning any partoership interest in the partnership.
~I /) 5#- -1"'1-"/71, /> ~6f..
fl:>l'hlA ij~ffC.f ';'1, V. i'.
/It?C' C1~H~./ ff'T1, f'C'-c.
,",?"olt.~." ~H/'-) /;, 712.~J. t C;&J~ /7t;~.
3. If any person- identified pUfi'Wllll to (I) above is non-profit organization or a trust, list the names of any person serving as
director of the non-profit organization or as trustee or beneficiary or trustor of the trust.
;vA
.
4.
Have you had more than $250 worth of business transacted with any member of the City staff, Boards, Commissions,
Committees, and COWICil within the past twelve month? Yes _ No ~f yes, please indicate person(s):
5.
Please identify each and every person, including any agents, employees, consultants, or independent Contractors who you
have assigned to represent you before the City in this matter.
Holl~y tf!Alfr/ff
ntge ~C#t7J'W-r I
6.
Have you and/or your officers or agents, in th.yrggregate, contributed more than $1,000 to a Council member in the current
or preceding election period? Yes _ No L If yes, slate which COWICil members(s):
Date:
?/,;-/9)-
.
- - - (NOTE: Attached additional pa~es necessary) ~ - -~ _ '
~ /f?~
Signa fContractor/Appli~.9..l&Y -eA1/,/7/
;:a~.' C""'.JTC?~O Ide.
Print or type name of Contractorl Applicant
- l!m!I!l is defined as: "Any individual. firm. co-partnership, joint venture, association. social club, fraternal organization,
corporation, estate. trust, receiver, syndicate. this and any other county, city or country, city municipality, district. or other political
subdivision, or any other group or combination acting as a unit. /..2-7
lQ
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item /3
Meeting Date 6/20/95
SUBMITTED BY:
Resolution J ? 9 ;J.J Appropriating additional funds from the
Traffic Signal Fund to fund the City's share of the I-80S and Otay Valley
Road interchange improvements
Director of Public Works ~
City Manager 'J/ 1",4- :r {;
(4/5ths Vote: YesXNo_)
,
ITEM TITLE:
REVIEWED BY:
The California Department of Transportation (CaITrans) has let a contract to re-construct the
I-80S and Otay Valley Road interchange, which includes two new traffic signals, CalTrans has
billed the City of Chula Vista per our agreement to share the costs, This agreement was
approved by Resolution 17360 on January II, 1994, CalTrans has tentatively scheduled the
construction start date this month and has requested our share before beginning construction,
However, $89,300 of Redevelopment (RDA) funds was originally budgeted for the project
Due to the shortfall in Redevelopment funds and the availability of funds in the Traffic Signal
Fund, staff is proposing to appropriate Traffic Signal Funds in lieu of RDA funds, Traffic
signal monies are available for appropriation so that the City can pay CalTrans its share,
RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the resolution appropriating $89,300 from the
Traffic Signal Fund to replace the Redevelopment Funds originally budgeted,
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable,
DISCUSSION:
On January II, 1994, City Council approved Resolution 17360 approving an agreement with
the California Department of Transportation (CaITrans) for interchange and traffic signal
improvements at I-80S and Otay Valley Road and to share equally in the cost
CalTrans has identified the interchange signalization as a safety improvement project and has
agreed to share its cost The project's estimated total cost is $669,000, of which the City share
is half ($334,500), Elements of the proposed project are: 1) traffic signals at both northbound
and southbound I-80S ramps, 2) widening of the northbound and southbound off ramps,
3) widening of Otay Valley Road at the interchange by 3 feet on each side of the roadway, and
4) new curb, gutter, and sidewalk on the south side of Otay Valley Road within CalTrans right-
of-way,
The City's share of $334,500 was budgeted from the following fund accounts: a) Otay Valley
Road Assessment District 90-2 ($100,000); b) Traffic Signal Fees ($145,200); and
c) Redevelopment Agency fund ($89,300), Funds are available in Project No, TF-220 (Traffic
13-/
Page 2, Item /.3
Meeting Date 6/20/95
Signal Improvements - 1-805 and Otay Valley Road). However, due to the shortfall of
Redevelopment funds, staff looked at alternative sources of monies to replace the
Redevelopment funds. The Traffic Signal fund, which is an appropriate account for this
expenditure, has funds available which can be appropriated to replace the Agency funds.
According to CalTrans, the low bid for the construction is $372,356 which is considerably
below the engineer's estimate of $505,000. In addition, there is an estimated $164,000 in
engineering, inspection, and utility relocation costs for a new project total of $536,356 rather
than the $669,000 originally estimated. However, in order to proceed, CalTrans requires the
City to deposit the full amount called for in the agreement. Therefore, it is estimated that, due
to the low bid, the City should receive a rebate due to overpayments once all the project costs
are finalized. The agreement provides for the City and CalTrans to share 1/2 in all final costs.
Therefore, if not all our share is used, we will receive a reimbursement. However, if the
project costs more than provided for in the agreement, we will have to pay CalTrans 1/2 the
additional costs. Staff estimates the City could receive as much as $66,322 back (one-half the
difference between bid and estimated construction cost) from CalTrans upon completion of
construction.
FISCAL IMPACT: Appropriation of Traffic Signal funds could replace the $89,300 budgeted
from Redevelopment Agency funds in order to keep the budget at the anticipated City share
of $334,500. Per the agreement with CalTrans, the City share cannot exceed $367,000.
However, given the fact that the low bid for construction is below the engineer's estimate, the
City anticipates spending less than the $334,500 budgeted. The City could receive a rebate
from CalTrans of up to $66,322 depending on the final project costs.
The ongoing operational costs are estimated at $4,000 per year for the City's share of energy
and maintenance of the traffic signals. This amount has been included in the City operating
budget.
Attachments: Area Plat
Minutes from 1/11/94 Council Meeting (excerpt)
Resolution 17360
File No: BR-043
TF-220
ST-123
m:\home\engineer\agenda\ovtfees2.hr
j J;,;2..
RESOLUTION NO. )7933
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROPRIATING ADDITIONAL FUNDS
FROM THE TRAFFIC SIGNAL FUND TO FUND THE
CITY'S SHARE OF THE I-805 AND OTAY VALLEY ROAD
INTERCHANGE IMPROVEMENTS
WHEREAS, The California Department of Transportation
(CalTrans) has let a contract to re-construct the I-805 and Otay
Valley Road interchange, which includes two new traffic signals;
and
WHEREAS, CalTrans has billed the City of Chula vista per
our agreement to share the costs which agreement was approved by
Resolution 17360 on January 11, 1994; and
WHEREAS, CalTrans has
construction start date this month
before beginning construction; and
tentatively scheduled the
and has requested our share
WHEREAS, $89,300 of Redevelopment funds was originally
budgeted for the project, however, due to the shortfall in
Redevelopment funds and the availability of funds in the Traffic
Signal Fund, staff is proposing to appropriate Traffic Signal Funds
in lieu of RDA funds.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the
city of Chula vista does hereby appropriate $89,300 from the
Traffic Signal Fund to replace the Redevelopment Funds originally
budgeted to fund the city's share of the I-805 and Otay Valley Road
interchange improvements.
ed as
A
fO'!)
Presented by
John P. Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
Bruce M.
Attorney
c: \rs\OVRfees2
/] -:3 /13-+
w
~
\:
a_ .._ _n__ _._.'
AREA
J - J-
-,vftQUU ' ".
\,,/,
/
\
r(5 \ ~-
~ 0~ \r[
~~,~
~~ :J?
oC=~:;\t9
RD. SUBJECT INTERSECTION J
[
~
OTAY VALLE
I
I
I
I
I _
Q
:t
~
. B[jo~
e:, IOU ______
1816 E11
. ~'1 ~ c:T-"
. ~ ~~--
()
~
:t
C
I!l
III
DRAWN BY
M.J.DONNELL Y
-----------
TIT ~ (
D"T(
6/6/95
V)
o
CO
>-
<t
~
W
W
a::
l.L..
Q.
~
~
~
<!)
~ ?
i SUBJECT INTERSECTION
~
r
--,- _. ,,",''-'
,
\
\
TES~
-- -I
!ROAO
I I
I J
"-------
(= 200'
-. - -"-- - ".-- -
--~ ..--
PLAT
.
.
I
Minutes
January 11, 1994
Page 11
Councilmember Rindone questioned if the originally proposed signal was a cost less than the 50% cost of
the shared project.
Clifford Swanson, Deputy Public Works Director/City Engineer, responded that was correct based on the
original estimate. However, staff still had to get Caltrans permission to do it whether they shared the cost
or not.
RESOLtJnON 17360 OFFERED BY COUNClLMEMBER RINDONE, reading of the text was waived,
. A. Robert Tierney, 466 D Avenue #B. Coronado. CA, stated he endorsed that the intersection be
addressed, but if approved it would be in non.compliance with California State Title 24, Section 522,
Subsection b, Subsection 9, which required color coding for the traffic control bunons. He had submitted
a lener and information to Council earlier in the week. The design as it stood currently did not comply and
that in effect, Council would be disobeying the laws. The landings at the curb cuts did not comply and
hopefully there would be discussion before the end of the month regarding a similar problem with the
Broadway project. Caltrans had proven, by prior installations throughout the county, that they were not
dealing with those issues. It was the responsibility of the City to ensure that if a good, service, or program
was provided for the public that it be provided in its entirety so that it could be used by all in the
community. He requested that the item be denied until those issues were discussed and brought forth in
a meeting.
City Anorney Boogaard questioned if Caltrans would be performing the design services under the agreement.
Mr. Swanson stated that was correct, the City was not currently approving the design but approving a cost
sharing agreement. Caltrans would be doing the design and taking responsibility for construction 'of the
project.
City Anorney Boogaard stated the City would be reviewing the ultimate design to ensure compliance with
the ADA requirements pointed out by Mr. Tierney.
Mr. Tierney stated the project should also comply with California Title 24 standards as well. He questioned
whether that would be brought up to the general public for review.
City Anorney Boogaard stated the City would review to ensure compliance with all requirements.
Mr. Swanson stated Caltrans would make available any plans to the public that they may want to review.
City Anorney Boogaard questioned if any member of the public could request the plans from Caltrans.
Mr. Swanson responded that was correct.
Mr. Tierney requested they be made available to him and that he be contacted.
Councilmember Fox questioned when completion of the project was anticipated.
Mr. Swanson felt it was about a three month project because they had to widen the ramps, curbs and
guners, and put in a retaining wall on Otay Valley Road under the bridge.
Councilmember Moore stated the City had worked on the project for over one year and felt the City was
probably lucky they only had to pay half. He was disappointed it was scheduled to start in July 1994. He
had been under the opinion the design was being worked on. It reflected badly on government, the smaller
governments needed to convince the State that things could be done differently and bener.
VarE ON RESOLtJnON 17360: approved 4-0-1 wi~ Nader absent.
J3-j,
Minutes
January 11, 1994
Page 10
Mr. Leiter responded there was not, it was strictly a code amendment to allow the City in the future to issue
conditional use permits for that particular use.
City Attorney Boogaard stated the staff reports were available to the public in case they wanted to review
the actions being taken by the Council for the meeting. He questioned when the reports were available to
the public.
City Clerk Authelet responded that staff reports were available to the public on Friday mornings.
City Attorney Boogaard stated if there was any question as to what the item was. Mr. Tierney would be able
to review the reports as early as Friday morning. No permits were being proposed to be issued.
Mr. Tierney requested Council take his comments into consideration before issuing a penn it.
There being no further public testimony. the public hearing was declared closed.
ORDINANCE 2584 PLACED ON FmSf READING BY COUNCD..MEMBER MOORE, reading of the text was
waived, passed and approved 4-0-1 with Nader absent.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
. A. Robert Tierney, 466 D Avenue #B, Coronado, CA, stated the video company providing services
in the Council Chambers had a very detrimental effect and did not comply under California Title 24 or the
ADA. He had tried to present papers to the Clerk and had difficulty due to his disability getting around the
camera and almost fell. He requested that by the next Council meeting that all clear and accessible
pathways in the Chamber be kept as such. Cables should be hidden and not just covered over by carpet as
that did not comply with accessibility standards at State and Federal levels. He further requested that
signage related to, but was not limited to parking, communications, and stall striping be augmented
immediately within the City services such as City Hall, Police Department, etc. as such dates for those
changes had come and gone. He also requested, for immediate viewing (tomorrow), a copy of the Chula
Vista Accessibility Compliance Transition Plan as required under Section 225. The use of California Relay
Service (CRS) did not comply under Title II, Section 248. He requested that the maintenance department
remove a section of the chairs from the self-rising seats so persons with disabilities could enter and sit
without drawing attention to themselves and putting themselves in a detrimental position.
BOARD AND COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS
None submitted.
ACTION ITEMS
12. RESOLUflON 17360 APPROVING AN AGREEMENT wrrn TIlE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
TRANSPORTATION FOR INTEROiANGE TRAFFIC SIGNALS IMPROVEMENT AT INTERSfATE ROUTE 80S
AND OTAYVAlLEYROAD AND AUTIlORlZE THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT - The California
Department of Transportation (Caltrans) has completed a project report for the subject interchange traffic
signals improvement. Caltrans is now prepared to enter into a cooperative agreement with the City to
encumber funds to design and construct the proposed project. The construction of the project is scheduled
to commence in July 1994. The project report is the backbone for the cooperative agreement in determining
work to be done, design specifications, and construction and associated project costs. Staff recommends
approval of the resolution. (Director of Public Works)
;:J-7
.
.Si
RESOLUTION NO. 17360
.J
RESOLUTI ON OF THE C!TY COUNC I L OF THE C!TY OF CHULA
VISTA APPROVING AN AGREEMENT WITH THE CALIFORNIA
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION FOR INTERCHANGE TRAFFIC
SIGNALS IMPROVEMENT AT INTERSTATE ROUTE 805 AND OTAY
VALLEY ROAD AND AUTHORIZE THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID
AGREEMENT
WHEREAS, the California Department of Transportation (CalTrans) has
completed a project report for Interstate Route 805 and Otay Valley Road
interchange traffic signals improvement; and.
WHEREAS, CalTrans is now prepared to enter into a cooperative agreement
with the City to encumber funds to design and construct the proposed project
which is scheduled to commence in July 1994; and,
WHEREAS, the project report is the backbone for the cooperative agreement
in determinin9 work to be done, design specifications. and construction and
associated project costs.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista does hereby approve an agreement with the Cal ifornia Department of
Transportation for interchange traffic signals improvement at Interstate Route
805 and Otay Valley Road, known as document number C094-007, a copy of which is
on file in the office of the City Clerk.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of Chula Vista is hereby
authorized and directed to execute said Agreement for and on behalf of the City
of Chula Vista.
-
as to 0
l
by
(~I
Presented by
Works
Bruce M. Booga rd
Ci ty Attorney
.
..
J:J-Y
'-"
solution No. 17360
Page 2
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula
Vista, California, this 11th day of January, 1994, by the followin9 vote:
YES:
Council members:
Fox, Horton, Moore, Rindone
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
Councilmembers:
None
Councilmembers:
Nader
Councilmembers:
None
d f//I',1?-,O--I_'
Shirl\lY Horton
Mayor ~ro-Tempore
;;>"
ATTEST: _
{~,\~;,</ .
i;'h ';': r. -
,___)) '/' /i! --./;'
-\)U4) '_' J _ :'<.L I- "eI, ("-
Beverly A; Authelet, City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO) ss.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA )
I, Beverly A. Authelet, City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista, California, do
hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 17360 was duly passed, approved,
and adopted by the City Council at a meeting of the Chula Vista City Council held
on the 11th day of January, 1994.
Executed this 11th day of January, 1994.
<,
.
(C /) /J /} Ii
X~U.Cc ~ [I, (j(~'ri:f::-
Beverly AI Authelet, City Clerk
.
) J -1 ) I'rlO
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item JLI
Meeting Date 6/20/95
ITEM TITLE:
Resolution /713 i
asphaltic concrete
Accepting bids and awarding contract for
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public Works
(4/5ths Vote: Yes_NoX)
City Manage0C4 ~
Bids were received and opened at 3 :00 pm on May 31, 1995, in the office of the Purchasing
Agent for furnishing asphaltic concrete to the City for use during the period July I, 1995
through June 30, 1996.
REVIEWED BY:
...-,
RECOMMENDATION: That Council accept the bids and award the contract to the lowest
responsible bidder, Sim 1. Harris Co.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
Bids were requested for the following:
Item Material Estimated
Usage
1 Type III-F-AR-4000 asphaltic concrete (sheet asphalt) 500 Tons
2 Type III-D-AR-4000 asphaltic concrete (3/8" max aggregate) 2,000 Tons
3 Type III-D-SC-800 asphaltic concrete (cold mix) 500 Tons
4 Type B2-AR-4000 asphaltic concrete (3/4" max aggregate) 1,000 Tons
5 Type III-AR-4000 asphaltic concrete (3/8" fine) 500 Tons
Five vendors were mailed bid proposal forms with the following bids received:
Price Per Ton
Total Bid Based
Bidder Item I Item 2 Item 3 Item 4 Item 5 on Estimated
Usage
1. 8im J. Harris - San Diego 23.00 20.50 23.00 19.00 20.50 $99,777.50
2. CA Commercial Asphalt - San Diego 24.00 22.00 24.50 20.00 22.00 $106,197.50
3. Industrial Asphalt - San Diego 26.00 22.00 24.00 21.00 22.50 $108,337.50
4. Lakeside Asphalt - Lakeside 23.00 23.00 23.25 21.00 23.50 $109,006.25
5. Asphalt Inc. - EI Cajon 28.00 25.00 26.00 22.00 25.75 $119,706.25
Ji/-/
Page 2, Item J LJ
Meeting Date 6/20/95
The low bid of Sim J. Harris meets specifications and is acceptable to the Director of Public
Works. California Commercial Asphalt was the low bid last year based on a cost savings due
to location. Specifically, staff calculated the staff time and equipment costs associated with
travel to and from facilities. Because California Commercial Asphalt was located in Chula
Vista as compared to San Diego, Lakeside or El Cajon, the savings offset the price difference
between the low bid and California Commercial. This year, staff is not recommending
consideration be given to location based on the following:
. Because the California Commercial Asphalt plant in Chula Vista was closed, we had
to re-route 44 trips to the Clairemont plant for asphalt. Therefore, the savings
associated with staff time and equipment was not realized.
. Cold mix (Item 3) is not available at the Chula Vista site. As a result crews are re-
routed to the Clairemont site. Again savings associated with staff and equipment are
not realized.
. The quality of material received from California Commercial Asphalt was not
consistent. Several times loads were returned because the mix was unacceptable.
. Based on the above reasons, calculation of savings for staff time involved in travel to
and from facilities was not a consideration in award of this bid. Also, the San Diego
plants of bidders 1, 2, and 3 are approximately the same distance from Chula Vista.
FISCAL IMPACT: Funds are provided for in the Public Works Operations budget for FY
1995/96 and awarding of this contract is contingent upon approval of the budget. The General
Fund will be reimbursed 100% from gas tax or sewer funds. The total bid is based on an
estimated usage not to exceed $99,777.50. The price per ton is firm. The cost to the City will
be based on actual usage times the firm price per ton, not to exceed $99,777.50 for FY 95/96.
db
M:\HO!vlE\ENGINEER\AGENDA \ASPHALT.OPS
/'1-.,2
RESOLUTION NO.
/79:) 'I
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR ASPHALTIC
CONCRETE
WHEREAS, bids were received and opened at 3:00 p.m. on the
31st day of May, 1995, in the Office of the Purchasing Agent of the
City of Chula vista for furnishing asphaltic concrete to the city
for use during the period July 1, 1995 through June 30, 1996 as
follows:
ITEM
MATERIAL
ESTIMATED
USAGE/TONS
1
2
3
4
5
Type III-F-AR-4000 asphaltic concrete (sheet asphalt)
Type III - D- AR -4000 asphaltic concrete (3/8" max . aggregate)
Type III-D-SC-800 asphaltic concrete (cold mix)
Type B2-AR-4000 asphaltic concrete (3/4" max aggregate)
Type III-AR-4000 asphaltic concrete (3/8" fine)
500
2,000
500
1,000
500
WHEREAS, the following five bids were received:
Price Per Ton
Bidder Item 1 Item 2 Item 3 Item 4 Item 5
1. Sim J. Harris - San Diego 23.00 20.50 23.00 19.00 20.50
2. CA Commercial Asphalt - San Diego 24.00 22.00 24.50 20.00 22.00
3. Industrial Asphalt - San Diego 26.00 22.00 24.00 21.00 22.50
4. Lakeside Asphalt - Lakeside 23.00 23.00 23.25 21.00 23.50
5. Asphalt Inc. - El Cajon 28.00 25.00 26.00 22.00 25.75
WHEREAS, the low bid of Sim J. Harris meets specifications
and is acceptable to the Director of Public Works.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
DOES HEREBY FIND, DETERMINE, ORDER AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. That the City Council does hereby accept the
bid of sim J. Harris as responsive.
1
;1-)
section 2. The city council awards
asphaltic concrete to Sim J. Harris to supply,
the items of asphaltic materials on the price
forth above, as the lowest responsible bidder
responsive bid to the approved specifications.
the contract for
on demand by City,
per ton basis set
which submitted a
section 3. The Acting Purchasing Agent of the City of
Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said
contract for and on behalf of the city of Chula vista.
Presented by
A to or:]
d, City
David Byers, Deputy Director
Public Works Operations
Bruce M.
Attorney
C: \ rs\ashconc rete
2
/1-1/
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item / S
Meeting Date 6/20/95
ITEM TITLE:
PUBLIC HEARING: Resolution
1993 Update of the Public Facilities
change in the fee amount
Approving an addendum to the
Development Impact Fee, with no
SUBMITIED BY: Deputy City Manager Krempl
Senior Management Assistant Young
REVIEWED BY:
City Manager
(4/5ths Vote: Yes_ No X)
STAFF RECOMMENDS THAT THIS HEARING BE CONTINUED TO THE MEETING OF
TUESDAY, JULY 11, 1995.
- /5 -tJ
Item 16
Date of Meeting: 6/20/95
PUBLIC HEARING
DRAFT MULTIPLE SPECIES CONSERVATION PROGRAM
(MSCP) PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT/ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENT
(EIR/EIS)
This item will be delivered under separate cover on Fridav.
6/16/95.
-/t; -
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item H
Meeting Date 6/20195
Continued Public Hearing on the Draft Multiple Species Conservation
Program (MSCP) Plan and Enviromnental Impact Report 1 Enviromnental
Impact Statement
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Pla~ng #
REVIEWED BY, CJ", """,<J:; ~ ~l
On June 13, 1995, the City Council held a public hearing regarding the draft MSCP Plan and
EIRlEIS. Following distribution of the City Council Agenda Statement for that public hearing
(Attachment 13), the City Council and staff received additional correspondence regarding the
draft Plan, and the City Council also received public testimony at the public hearing which
required further response. Therefore, the City Council continued action on this item for one
week in order to allow staff to prepare written responses to the letters and testimony which were
received.
ITEM TITLE:
(4/5ths Vote: Yes_NoX)
RECOMMENDATION: It is recommended that the City Council authorized the attached
revised draft letters to the City of San Diego regarding the draft MSCP Plan and EIRlEIS.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Recommendations from the Resource
Conservation Commission are discussed below.
DISCUSSION:
The written comments that were received since the original City Council Agenda Statement
(Attachments 1-8) and public testimony taken at the June 13 hearing are discussed below. The
issues raised in these letters and testimony can be categorized as:
1) preserve design issues, dealing with the proposed Multiple Habitat Planning Area
boundary; and
2) policy issues addressed in the draft MSCP Plan and EIRlEIS.
The draft letters to the City of San Diego which staff had prepared regarding the draft MSCP
Plan and the EIRIEIS have been revised to be consistent with our responses to the comments
discussed below (see Attachments 9 and 10). In addition, a detailed listing of changes to the
Multiple Habitat Planning Area boundary in response to comments has been prepared
/~ -I
Page 2, Item !.it.-
Meeting Date 6/20/95
(Attachment 11), and the "Revised Multiple Habitat Planning Area Boundary Map" exhibit has
also been updated (Attachment 12).
1. Preserve Design Issues
a. Emerald Properties Corporation
The letter from Garrett Thelander, Vice President of Emerald Properties
Corporation (EPC) (Attachment I) communicates EPe's ultimate goal to be
responsive to requests made by the wildlife agencies to eliminate development on
the northern parcel of San Miguel Ranch. The letter also emphasizes that EPC
cannot forego processing of residential development on the northern parcel unless
certain commitments and assurances are agreed upon among the interested parties
and entities. Staff feels that the designation of the northern parcel as "future 90%
habitat preserve area (subject to a conservation agreement)" adequately covers
these concerns.
b. Buie Communities
The letter from Buie Communities (Attachment 2) expressed concerns regarding
the designation of their property (Bonita Meadows) as a "core biological resource
area", and designation as a "100% preserve area" in the MSCP Plan. In
response, staff is recommending the designation of the Buie property as a special
study area as opposed to the Draft Plan's designation as 100% preserve. This
designation will provide an opportunity for additional studies to be carried out on
this area at the time a subarea plan is prepared.
c. Otav Water District
The letter from the Otay Water District (Attachment 3) is requesting that the "use
parcel" north of Salt Creek Ranch be deleted from the MSCP Plan. The District
points out that the majority of this parcel is either already being utilized for water
district facilities, or could be developed in the future, although it is acknowledged
that the northern portion of the site is being preserved as natural open space.
While our staff feels that the open space areas on this site should be coordinated
with the overall MSCP Plan, we are recommending that the property be deleted
from the MHPA boundary at this time.
/" - ,2
Page 3, Item iJz-
Meeting Date 6/20/95
d. SDG&E
The letter from SDG&E (Attachment 4) is requesting that SDG&E's Miguel
Substation property be designated "not a part" of the MSCP Plan. In further
discussions with SDG&E regarding this request, our staff suggested that the
property be designated as a "special study area" and further that it be noted on
the Revised MHP A Boundary exhibit that the property is being included in
SDG&E's overall MSCP subregional plan. It is our understanding that this
approach is acceptable to SDG&E, and our letter and exhibits have been modified
accordingly.
e. H. Ernest Schnepf and Other Propertvowners Adiacent to Sweetwater Regional
Park
The letter from Mr. Schnepf (Attachment 5) requested the deletion of 10 parcels
(his own properties plus those of adjoining neighbors) from the Multiple Habitat
Planning Area (MHPA) boundary north of the Sweetwater Regional Park. In
further investigating this request, staff has verified that these properties are
already developed, and should be removed from the MHPA boundary. In
addition, we are proposed to redesignate the area covered by the Sweetwater
Regional Park to "special study area" to allow further evaluation of specific uses
within this area.
f. EastLake
At the public hearing on June 13, a representative of EastLake Development
Company raised additional concerns regarding proposed preserve areas south of
East Orange A venue at the entrance to the Olympic Training Center, and at the
eastern edge of the Eastlake Planned Community adjacent to Wueste Road. In
reviewing the adopted Eastlake General Development Plan, staff has verified that
the specific areas referenced above are planned for urban uses and/or open space
uses which do not require preservation of native vegetation. Therefore, it is
recommended that these areas be deleted from the MHP A boundary.
g. James Algert
At the public hearing on June 13, James Algert raised a concern regarding the
specific designation which is being placed on his property, which is located
northerly of San Miguel Ranch northern parcel. As a follow-up to this issue,
staff has met with Mr. Algert, and verified that the City is proposing to
redesignate his properties as "special study areas." Mr. Algert was in agreement
with that recommendation.
I~ .3
Page 4, Item L
Meeting Date 6/20/95
h. Land-locked Parcels
In response to an inquiry by the City Council at the hearing on June 13, staff has
reviewed the recommended Revised MHP A boundary map and has concluded that
there are no privately owned parcels that would be land locked by the preserve
design. One parcel that is part of the Otay Ranch which is surrounded by Bureau
of Land Management (BLM) property is designated as open space in the Otay
Ranch GDP. Other parcels which could become land locked are owned by BLM
and are committed to the preserve.
I. Other Miscellaneous Requests for MHP A Changes
In addition to the specific requests described above, there are several other minor
miscellaneous changes to the MHPA boundary map which have been identified,
and are listed on Attachment 11.
2. Concerns Regarding the Draft MSCP Plan
Concerns regarding the Plan which did not specifically address the MHPA boundary
include the following:
a. San Diego Association of Realtors (SDAOR)
The SDAOR raised the following issues in its letter (see Attachment 6): 1)
preclusion of the need to list more species as endangered or threatened; 2)
enabling and facilitating economic development on lands not designated for habitat
preservation; and 3) concern regarding a parcel tax.
Response:
Staff feels that the City's draft letter regarding the MSCP Plan already addresses
the issues of concern in this letter; however, we would recommend that the
SDAOR letter be attached to our response.
c. Resource Conservation Commission
The RCC comments from their meeting of June 12, 1995 are attached
(Attachment 7). The major issues addressed by RCC in these comments include:
1) a list of species not "covered" by the Draft MSCP which should be
"covered; It
/~. <I
Page 5, Item L
Meeting Date 6/20/95
2) a list of species which are "covered" where additional protection may be
required;
3) request for a priority system of land acquisition encouraging in-kind
mitigation whenever possible; and
4) the inclusion of watershed management plans in conjunction with the
MSCP adoption.
In addition, specific technical comments regarding the draft EIR/EIS are included.
Response:
We are recommending that the RCC comments be attached to the City's letters
regarding the draft MSCP Plan and EIR/EIS, while noting that specific technical
comments dealing with approved projects such as the Otay Ranch General
Development Plan will be further evaluated by staff prior to recommending any
specific changes to the final adopted MSCP Plan.
e. Letter from C. Burrascano
The position taken in this letter (Attachment 8) regarding "covered" and "not
covered" species is similar to that taken by the Resource Conservation
Commission. Therefore, the letter should be forwarded to the City of San Diego
for a response.
FISCAL IMPACT: Staffreview and participation in this program is supported by the General
Fund at this time. It should be recognized that future implementation of this program could
result in significant additional local costs, which will need to be further evaluated prior to any
final actions being taken by the City Council on this matter.
/ (,. _ l
Page 6, Item ~
Meeting Date 6/20/95
Attachments
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
II.
12.
13.
Letter of 6/12/95 from Emerald Properties Corp.
Letter of 617195 from Buie Communities, Inc.
Letter of 6/12/95 from the Dtay Water District to David Flesh, MSCP Project Manager
Letter of 6/13/95 from Don Rose, SDG&E
Letter of 6/12/95 from H. Ernest Schnepf
Letter of 5/30/95 from San Diego Association of Realtors
Comments of Resource Conservation Commission on the Draft MSCP and EIR/EIS
Letter of 6/12/95 from Cindy Burrascano
Amended draft letter to the City of San Diego on the MSCP
Amended draft letter to the City of San Diego on the Draft EIRlEIS
Listing of proposed changes to .the "Revised multiple habitat planning area boundary " mall
ReVISed MultIple Habitat Planmng Area Boundary MaP/Lv->t~ {, ~c.v<- ..ALU~
Council Agenda Statement of 6/13/95 (with Attachments A through Q)
(m:\HOME\PLANNING\NANCY\MSCP3.AI13)
(t -t
z~)
Attachment 1
1.
EMERALD PROPERTIES CORP.
280 Park Avenue, 23 West
New York, NY 10017
(212) 454-3303
l' "J' " 'r,~-
\.' L; " J... I...' .'.
I ~ ,". ~ .. .
Garrett W. Thelander
Vice President
June 12, 1995
Robert Leiter
Director of Planning
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Re: San Miguel Ranch / Public Hearing on Draft Multiple
Species Conservation Program ("MSCP")
Dear Bob:
I have reviewed the Council Agenda Statement dated June 13,
1995 ("staff report"), regarding the upcoming hearing before the
City Council on the Draft Multiple Species Conservation Program
("MSCP") and the related environmental documents. This letter
includes our comments on the staff report as they relate to San
Miguel Ranch. We would like this letter to be included with the
documents to be submitted to the City Council for the upcoming
hearing.
At page 4, City staff states that the property owner
(Emerald Properties, Corp.) "will be requesting consideration by
the City Council of a General Plan Amendment which would allow
for transfer of density credits (up to 357 dwelling units) from
the Northern Parcel to the Southern Parcel." We are not
necessarily requesting transfer of density credits, Instead, we
are requesting that a General Plan Amendment be processed, to
change certain land use designations on the southern parcel of
San Miguel Ranch. The changes in the land use designations will
allow flexibility in project design so that the MSCP open space
and resource protection objectives can be achieved.
In addition, City staff states that a density transfer
"would potentially have a substantial impact on the overall
design and character of the currently approved San Miguel Ranch
General Development Plan." We are currently in the process of
preparing a project redesign for the southern parcel of San
Miguel Ranch. The redesign is intended to address these density,
design and character issues.
.~ /ri'?
Our ultimate goal is to be responsive to requests made by
the wildlife agencies to eliminate development on the northern
parcel of San Miguel Ranch. However, we cannot forego processing
of residential development on the northern parcel unless certain
commitments and assurances are agreed upon among the interested
parties and entities. We will continue to work with City staff
to attempt to achieve our ultimate goal. If the goal cannot be
achieved, however, we will proceed with the residential
development on the northern portion of San Miguel Ranch.
Thank you for your consideration.
GWT/mab
cc: file
~~
IlUIE COMMUNITIES,INC
Attachment 2
-'!
9
June 7. 1995
BAND-DELIVERED
COMMENTS
MSCP Plan
600 "B" Street. Suite 500
San Diego. Cal1fornta 92101
Re: MSCP Plan dated March 1. 1995
Document No. 110921000
Bonita Meadows Property
Gentlemen:
We are the owners of the property located at Proctor Valley Road and
Blacksmith Road commonly referred to as Bonita Meadows (Assessor
Parcel No. 590-250-05) (the "Property").
We recently have had an opportunity to review the draft MSCP Plan (the
"Plan"). We have several concerns and comments regarding the Plan
includ1ng. but not Umtted to. the folloWing: (1) the real1stic economic
feasibility of local. state and federal agencies to implement such an
aggressive plan; (2) the lack of actual field survey data to corroborate the
existence of endangered species and/ or the extent and value of any
habitat which would support the designation of the Property as a "Core
Biological Resource Area"; (3) the ability of the local. "tate and fPderal
agencies to repeatedly come back and continue to &t new species as
threatened or endangered; (4) the requirement of an addltlonal6oo-foot
buffer area which w1ll further decrease any developable area remaining
on the Property; (5) the requirement to pay a $1.500 per-acre charge for
long-term management. maintenance and monitoring of the proposed
preselVe area; and (6) the increase in the possibility of the regulatory
"taking" of the Property that w1ll render it Virtually undevelopable.
We also would like to bring to your attention the followtng facts which
support our bellef that there is a lack of actual field sUlVey data to
corroborate the existence of endangered species and/ or the extent and
~0~J!
Page 2
Comments/MSCP
June 7.1995
value of any habitat which would support the designation of the Property
as a "Core Biological Resource Area":
1. The ProDertv Dresently is bounded on the west and south by
existin~ residential develooment and on the east by the Drooosed 2. 600-
acre San M~uel Ranch Drolect.
The Property's prox1mlty to existing and proposed residential
development precludes effective connectMty for the proposed preserve
area. The majority of the proposed habitat area on the Property is
isolated. or wlll be spotty at best. creating a vast hurdle for any species
to overcome and further reducing the ability for any species to move
freely between habitat areas.
Plan Section 4.2.3 "Development" states in pertinent part:
". . . .IRlesidential develoDment can promote habitat loss and
fragmentation. degrade soU. air. water and visual quality; promote
brook parasitism by cowbirds; increase introduced species; alter
the composltlon of Wildlife; and increase predation of domestic
animals. "
2. The MetroDOlltan Water District has utlllzed an easement for
water transmission line DUrooses which traverses a DOrtlon of the
eastern section of the Prooertv and has used Darts of the Prooertv as a
st"a1nl!: area for its construction actMties includlnl!: work taklnl!: Dlace
within Proctor Vallev Road in connection with its Drolect.
Plan Section 4.2.3 "Development" states in pertinent part:
"Impacts of other types of development such as industrial.
certain types of utilities. and landfllls. vary considerably.
and mav be more intensive than residential or commerc1alin
some areas. . . ."
3. Caltrans currently is in the Drocess of Dreoarlnl1 an
Envlronmentallmoact Statement for the DroDOSed a-lane Route
125 "It~nment includln~ an alternative which would have the
~It~ment Droceed in a north/south direction along the northern
and eastern boundaries of the Prooertv.
Plan Section 4.2.3 "Development" further states in pertinent part:
"HeavUy used roads and ra1llines are incompatible with
biological preserve management goals. but it may be
infeasible to prohibit public transportation corridors through
~ /i.-/t/
Page 3
Comments/MSCP
June 7. 1995
all preserve areas. Roads isolate populations. restrict
wtlcllife movement. interrupt breeding cycles, and affect
runolf. among other impacts. The width of the road has a
critical effect on wtldl1fe movement. . . . "
4. Proctor Valley Road currentlv extends in a
north/south direction alonl!: the northern and eastern boundaries
of the Prooertv.
Please refer to the quote stated in paragraph 3 above.
To summarize. we request that (1) more consideration be given to
the comments and concerns previously expressed in numbers (1)
through (6) above; and (2) the designation of "Core Biological
Resource Area" be deleted from the Property.
We thank you for the opportunity to review the Plan and to proVide the
above comments for your consideration.
If you have any questions regarding this letter. please do not hesitate to
contact me.
Very truly yours,
BUIE-BONITA MEADOWS L.P.
~
~-l~
Robert F. Bule
President
RFB/pb
cc: Ms. Barbara Reid - City of Chula Vista Planning Department
-/
)~ r //
Y /J-)J
Attachment 3
...CDrnil:otrn (0 COll1ll1l1"it~ 9clliec
10595 JAMACHA BOULEVARD, SPRING VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 91977
TELEPHONE: 670-2222, AREA CODE 619
,
i'J
June 12, 1995
Mr. David Flesh
MSCP Project Manager
city of San Diego
600 "B" street, suite 500
San Diego, CA 92101
VXA PAX 533-4296
r. U.S. MAXL
Subject: Draft - Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP)
(w.o. 8014/F.N. 3830)
Dear Mr. Flesh:
The Otay water District (OWD) appreciates the opportunity to
comment on the March 1, 1995 Draft Multiple Species Conservation
Program (MSCP). As a regional public facility provider, whose
district encompasses one-fifth of the Multiple Habitat Planning
Area (MHPA), as well as being a steward of the San Miguel Habitat
Management Area, OWO is very interested in the MSCP and wishes to
actively participate. Our principal areas of concern are; 1) OWD
not being addressed as a "regional public facility provider", 2)
recognition of our existing Habitat Management Area(HMA), and 3)
the identification of water facilities as "conditionally
compatible" which could place many of our projects in jeopardy.
Attached are OWD I S detailed comments, the following paragraphs
summarize those comments:
. The OWD is currently a regional public facility provider and
should be identified as such in the MSCP Plan. OWD provides
service to multiple jurisdictions including significant
portions of the cities of Chula vista, San Diego, and the
County of San Diego. Also, our projects cross one or more
jurisdictions in construction, operation and financing.
. OWD requests that existing mitigation banking programs, such
as OWD's Section 7 Consultation, be officially recognized and
credit given to the owners/operators in the MSCP plan. The
MSCP should address the existing Endangered Species Act (ESA)
permits, take allocations and existing agreements, which
should not be affected by the MSCP.
-7/t/JJ
'Mr. David Flesh
June 12, 1995
Page 2
. The District wishes to maintain its autonomy as a Special
District since it services a number of jurisdictions and is
concerned that the program as outlined would severely restrict
OWD's authority. To place OWD in a subordinate role to one or
all of the various local jurisdictions may threaten our
ability to provide the expected level of service to our
customers, and place each in a position to negatively impact
the other.
. The OWD requests that its Master Plan be recognized in the
MSCP and the potential impact on future facilities be included
within the final MSCP documents, and within the MSCP final
EIR/EIS.
. Apparently the MSCP proposes financing strategies which
assumes voter-approved higher taxes (parcel tax) and/or
facility and service fees collected from existing and future
residents throughout the MSCP. Should a utility tax, applied
either directly or indirectly through the San Diego County
Water Authority or any of its member agencies, be utilized OWD
would be compelled to identify such a tax on its water
statements. OWD recommends against such a tax or fee.
. Please be advised that the District's "USE AREA" is not
available as part of the MSCP. We have 190.3 acres committed
to our Capital Improvement Program (CIP) through a Section 7
Agreement with the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The
remaining acreage is planned for other uses, such as water
facilities, development, parks and/or recreational activities.
OWD remains committed to regional habitat planning, however as
written the current draft requires considerable modification to
address the above issues and those detailed in the attachment.
OWD requests: I) our issues be addressed in a new dra.ft to be
recirculated for additional review and comment, 2) OWD be given
the opportunity to have representation at planning or working
group meetings, and 3) the MSCP and the Implementing Agreement be
coordinated more closely with all water agencies.
~ J~-/f
Mr. David Flesh
June 12, 1995
Page 3
Thank you for considering these comments. If you have any
questions please contact Mr. Michael F. Coleman (670-2293), our
Environmental Specialist.
Sincerely, ~
Ii .,~ V::s; .. ...
Keith Lewinger ~
General Manager
KL/MFC: cp
Attachment-OWD's Detailed Response to the Draft MSCP
cc: Doug Clarke
Mike Coleman
Tom Harron
Dan Mahanke
Bart Mumford
Jim Peasley
Tim Stanton,
Bob Asher, County of San Diego
Bob Leiter, City of Chula Vista
-~-J~
OWO's Detailed RespoDse to the Draft KSCP
June 12, 1995
OWD is responsible for providing potable, reclaimed water
and sewer services to customers within a service area of
approximately 80,000 acres (approximately one-seventh of the
entire MSCP area). In addition, the location of the OWD service
area is in the southeastern portion of the MSCP area and occurs
over approximately one-fifth of the lands identified as habitat
preserve lands in the Multi-Habitat Planning Area (MHPA). OWD's
service area includes significant portions of the cities of Chula
Vista, San Diego, and the County of San Diego. Consequently, the
OWD is currently a regional public facility provider as defined
in the MSCP and desires to be identified as such in the MSCP
Plan. OWD has both easement and fee title over hundreds of miles
of service lines which run throughout its service area both in
developed and undeveloped areas. In addition, OWD operates
storage, pumping, and transmission facilities at various sites
within its service area. OWD delivers predominantly imported
water to its customers, transported via aqueducts owned and
operated by the Metropolitan Water District of Southern
California (MWD) and San Diego County Water Authority (CWA).
In addition, it may be worthy of note that OWD is a land
steward of habitat set aside for the long-term preservation of
native habitats and sensitive species. The OWD has established
an approximately 190 acre habitat mitigation bank, the San Miguel
Habitat Management Area within an area identified as a core
preserve within the MSCP of this area, approximately 60 acres has
been committed as a result of the Endangered Species Act (ESA) ,
section 7 consultation, and CEQA miti~ation actions. This land
is managed and monitored by OWD and has a regular reporting
program similar to that proposed within the MSCP. Further, OWD
recently participated in the purchase of Rancho San Diego lands
which are to be placed into a natural habitat reserve.
Based on our reading of the MSCP document, we are greatly
concerned for our continued ability to provide efficient a.nd
economical service to our customers. We are further concerned
about our ability to preserve our autonomy as a special district
with the specific mandate of protecting the interests of our
customers by providing safe and reliable sources of water. In
~ ~- /j~/~
OWD's Detailed Response to the Draft MSCP
June 12, 1995
order to ensure that these interests are met, it is often
necessary to make difficult decisions relative to providing
service and the associated cost. This can result in differences
in opinion between OWO and the various land use jurisdictions
with which OWO overlaps. To place OWO in a subordinate role to
the various local jurisdictions may threaten our ability to
provide the level of service demanded. The otay Water District
is well-positioned by virtue of its history of land stewardship
and pro-active approach to meet future mitigation demands for
impacts to native habitats. With this in mind, we request the
formation of a provision for public water districts to be in a
position to reach permit approval without direct involvement or
approval of local jurisdictions. This should greatly ease
processing time and paperwork in the future while different
jurisdictions struggle to implement their respective plans. The
use of local jurisdictions should only be an optional approach
for those who don't have resources to manage their own efforts.
Given some of the significant proposals which the draft Plan
makes, there is clearly cause for concern by special districts
and most specifically larger districts which overlap multiple
jurisdictions such as OWo. We have summarized our primary
concerns with the MSCP Plan as written in the following points.
In addition, we offer specific comments to elements of the plan
text in numbered comments to follow.
Impacts of Preserves on New and Existing Service. In April
of 1995, the OWO completed a new draft of their Water
Resources Master Plan. The OWO's (as well as other local
water agencies') ability to construct facilities necessary
to meet existing and future demand may be significantly
affected by the proposed MSCP. This may especially become
true if large-scale conservation and/or mitigation occurs
within the OWO service area absent input from the OWO as to
existing service alignments and needs, and potential future
service needs. We are encouraged to see the term
"conditionally compatible" used in reference to water
projects and utilities within preserve and buffer areas, we
are, however concerned that this term has not been as
clearly defined as would be required to provide the OWO
assurances that it can continue to provide the necessary
service to meet its obligations. The OWD requests that an
-2-
~ /~~/
OWD's Detailed Response to the Draft MSCP
June 12, 1995
evaluation of its Master Plan and the MSCP's potential
impact on future facilities be included within the final
MSCP documents, and within the final EIR/EIS or that the
types of impacts associated with providing water service be
more thoroughly evaluated and specific language be included
to address the uncertainties identified.
Treatment of OWD as a Reqional Public Facility Provider. It
is important to note that special districts and smaller
utilities have not been well represented within the MSCP
planning process. Larger providers of public facilities such
as CWA, MTDB, and SDG&E have avoided the imposition of
additional layers of regulation through local land-use
jurisdictions by the incorporation of language designed to
address "regional public facility providers". Under this
designation, an entity is able to opt to participate through
a local entities program or work directly with the USFWS and
CDFG. Such "equal footing" is necessary to ensure that the
mandated objectives and statutory powers provided to OWD are
not diminished.
In the Draft Model Implementing Agreement/Management
Authorization presented in the Draft MSCP document,
paragraph 6.5 notes that "local special districts, such as
water districts or sewer districts," should seek permitting
authority through the "Local Jurisdiction" which would have
authority to issue Take Authorizations. In contrast,
regional public facility providers are allowed to apply for
Take Authorizations directly from the USFWS and CDFG.
Having pro-actively developed a program of habitat
protection within the OWD, and requiring a measure of
control and/or independence to effectively operate, it is
extremely important that the OWD maintain its ability to
work directly with the USFWS and CDFG. Our ability to work
directly with the permitting agencies dramatically decreases
our processing time and costs, while maintaining maximum
benefit to the preservation process. Further, we are
concerned that in situations where future allocation is
limited, the local jurisdictions may not agree with the
prioritization deemed appropriate by the OWD. This is
especially true where multiple jurisdictions are involved
~
~ /,,~/r
OWD's Detailed Response to the Draft MSCP
June 12, 1995
and the adjacent jurisdictions disagree over the routing or
service to be provided by a particular OWO project.
The Otay Water Oistrict Service Area overlaps multiple
jurisdictions as well as a wide geographic range. The
nature of many pipeline projects may require the involvement
of more than one jurisdiction, this would clearly complicate
approval procedures. Further, the own is currently in a
position to self-mitigate any of its currently anticipated
future projects and it is anticipated that own will continue
to stay ahead of the mitigation curve by maintaining a
reserve of mitigation lands. Under the scenario of
processing through a local jurisdiction, the own may be
unable to complete a project due to a local jurisdiction's
inability to implement their MSCP plan. The own requests
that we participate in the MSCP by participating as a
Regional Public Facility Provider.
Treatment of Existing Habitat Management programs. The own
has made a strong effort to anticipate where permanent,
short-term, and indirect impacts would occur to sage scrub
and the California gnatcatcher as a result of future own
projects. This was accomplished by a thorough review of all
potential own projects which may occur within the next five
years, referred to as the FY 1995 Five-Year Capital
Improvement Program (CIP), and analyzing the component
projects for potential impacts to coastal sage scrub
habitat. Focused California gnatcatcher surveys were
conducted along proposed water distribution routes or
facilities where potential impacts to sage scrub habitats
may be at issue. The end result of the studies was the
preparation of a comprehensive Biological Assessment and
Mitigation Program including a habitat management and
banking component, processed under Section 7 of the
Endangered Species Act, and issuance of a "no jeopardy"
Biological Opinion by the u.s. Fish & Wildlife Service on
November 16, 1994. This process established a mechanism for
own to monitor, manage, and report on its impact to sage
scrub lands and the status of the San Miguel Habitat
Management Area. It also authorizes OWO to make credits in
the habitat bank available to others. In that this habitat
ok ~/,/6-)1
OWD's Detailed Response to the Draft MSCP
June 12, 1995
bank land is considered to be of extreme value to regional
conservation efforts and available credits will not be
consumed for several years, it is imp~rative that such
banking programs be vested in the MSCP plan and the value of
these banks be recognized.
Handling of Existing Long-term Permits and Agreements. The
MSCP contemplates the absorption of the Interim Take program
currently in effect pursuant to section 4(d) of the ESA. In
addition, language in both the MSCP and Implementation
Agreement indicate that the local jurisdictions and state
and federal resource agencies are to "encourage
participation in the MSCP". To OWD, this would suggest that
the unstated part of this thought is that the state and
federal agencies are to discourage use of statutorily
provided alternative permitting avenues. Is this the case?
A biological opinion has been issued on the OWD FY 1995
Five-Year Capital Improvement Program. This opinion will
need to be amended from time to time to adjust the program
and project descriptions and modify biological information
as projects reach final design and construction phases.
while such amendments are not anticipated to be significant
or be of substantial complexity, OWD is concerned that the
MSCP contains language which threatens the future mechanics
of its treatment under section 7 of the ESA. The MSCP must
address the existing ESA permits, take allocations, and
agreements that would not be effected by adoption.
Ha:bi tat Preservation Designation of OWO Lands. The draft
Multi-Habitat Preservation Area map (Figure 1-3) and text
surrounding the figure and elsewhere in the document fails
to recognize that there is a distinction between "public
lands" and lands available for habitat preservation
objectives. This is especially true of lands owned by
special districts. Unlike many state and federally owned
lands, OWD's lands were acquired at a cost for the specific
purpose of providing safe and reliable delivery of water.
Very little of our land is available to be designated as
reserve, and none of it is free. currently, several areas
of key concern have been labeled for 100% preservation
including the otay Use Area, an area engaged for management
of potable and reclaimed waters and an active facility of
~ ~ /~ "';2t7
OWD's Detailed Response to the Draft MSCP
June 12, 1995
the District. It also appears that a number of OWD's tank
sites and a portion of our Regulatory Site are also
designated for full conservation. We were not involved in
this designation, nor have we reviewed the maps. Please be
clear on this point, none of Otay Water District's lands or
exclusive easement areas are available.
KSCP Financing strategy. Perhaps the most uncertain
component of the MSCP lies in how much it will cost and how
it is to be financed. There is no specific plan for funding
the MSCP yet it is expected to cost between one half and
three quarters of a billion dollars. While we understand
that developing a financing strategy for such capital costs
can be difficult, it is considered to be a critical
component of the plan and one which is seriously lacking in
the MSCP.
It is the OWO's understanding that funding for land acquisition,
operation, and maintenance is expected to be principally derived
from federal, state, and local governments, with additional funds
collected from private off-site mitigation. We further
understand that the some financing strategies assume that voter-
approved higher taxes (parcel tax) and/or facility and service
fees may be collected from existing and future residents
throughout the MSCP. The OWO's principal concern and opposition
would be to any type of utility tax applied either directly or
indirectly through the San Oiego County Water Authority or any of
its member agencies. This utility tax would be cumbersome to
administer and would not necessarily reflect equitable
distribution of costs.
With respect to the draft MSCP document and its potential affect
on the OWO's activities, the OWO offers the following comments:
1. We appreciate the recognition that water facilities and
utilities are conditionally compatible land uses within Core
Preserves, Linkages, and Buffers. Proper planning and
careful design and construction can make these necessary
elements of surrounding development produce a minimal effect
on native habitat. We would like to see more specific
language as to how compatibility will be determined.
-e- / /j,/r;J)
OWD's Detailed Response to the Draft MSCP
June 12, 1995
2. The OWD recognizes that a significant opportunity for
providing input to the MSCP process was missed by not
providing a staff member to the policy Committee meetings.
Further, there was virtually no involvement by other local
water districts or special districts. The exception to this
is the San Diego County Water Authority (CWA), which
according to the CWA, did not specifically undertake the
task of looking out for the interests of independent water
agencies. Further, it appears that most of CWA's concerns
have been resolve by excepting areas of potential action
within proposed core areas. As the OWD now recognizes that
the execution of the MSCP in its current form potentially
places great restrictions on local utilities' ability to
approve and implement both small and large-scale projects,
the OWD would like the opportunity to send a representative
to any future policy committee meetings and working group
meetings.
3. OWD is concerned that the total acquisition costs estimate
ranges from $433 to $751 million (pg 1-6, item 4), and would
like to see this range narrowed considerably prior to final
document approval.
4. OWD is a special district and currently not subject to the
same approval requirements identified within the identified
close local jurisdictions. OWD wishes to maintain its
autonomy and is concerned that the program as outlined would
radically restrict OWD's current operating control.
5. OWD has reviewed the Model Implementation Agreement and has
significant concerns relative to the structure of the
agreement and relative to the autonomy it would lose to the
various local jurisdictions. Further, OWD is concerned that
the language of the Model Implementing Agreement is
extremely vague and has ambiguously disclaimers throughout
which would make enforcement nearly impossible.
6. Pg 1-7, Figure 1-3: Otay Water District's Use Area (a 509
acre (approximate) property located on the lower slopes of
Mother Miguel and San Miguel mountains) is improperly shown
on MSCP mapping as a 100% Habitat Preserve area. A major
portion of the property is used by the OWD for potable and
.J- _~ / j~ .J ;;..
OWD's Detailed Response to the Draft MSCP
June 12, 1995
reclaimed water storage and transmission facilities.
Associated patrol roads and equipment storage facilities are
also present. Future expansion of operations may occur
within disturbed areas. The OWD recently established
(through Section 7) a 190.3 acre Coastal Sage Scrub habitat
reserve bank known as the San Miguel Habitat Management Area
(HMA) within the OWD Use Area. This HMA lies within the
state's Natural Communi ties Conservation Plan (NCCP)
Subregional Planning Area 10.1 and an identified core in the
MSCP. Please correct this error in the next draft by
excluding the OWD Use Area as a habitat preserve.
7. On Figure 1-3, the legend note "Percent preservation applies
only to habitat lands" does not appear to tie specifically
to a definition of habitat, and since all areas (developed,
undeveloped, natural, or disturbed) receive some amount of
use by flora and fauna, a specific operative definition of
habitat, in the context of the MSCP, is mandated.
8. Pg 1-8. OWD is highly concerned that the planning process
and the representatives on the MSCP working group appear not
to have effectively addressed the needs and concerns of
special districts such as water agencies, other utilities,
schools districts, etc.
9. Substantial error still exists within the vegetation mapping
within the MSCP. The vast majority of this error is a
discrimination of chaparral and sage scrub habitats. As a
result, various calculations made tend to erroneously state
the preservation ratio and quantities of each habitat type.
10. OWD believes that it is worth mentioning that not all
publicly owned lands are available or desirable to be used
for habitat preservation. Some areas are specifically owned
for public purposes necessary to achieve the basic function
of the public agency. These should not be indicated as
available for the various preservation designs.
11. Figure 2-3 should indicate that the mapping is generalized
and does not identify the various land uses within the
identified Biological Core Areas which already exist and are
to be maintained, and possibly expanded.
-i- ~Jj/)J
. OWO's Detailed Response to the Draft MSCP
June 12, 1995
12. Figure 2-7 erroneously identifies the OWO Use Area as
"Parks, Preserves, and Open Space". This is not the case,
so please exclude the OWO Use Area. It is an active part of
OWO's water storage and delivery system, and is planned to
continue in this use. A 190 acre preserve habitat bank
surrounding the active use area has been identified for
habitat preservation and is under the management of OWO.
13. Figure 2-9. The OWO Use Area is erroneously identified as a
Category II land with 90% preservation. This is incorrect.
A substantial portion of the Use Area, approximately 300
acres, is actively being used by OWO in their water systems.
14. Pg 3-1. It should be noted that OWO was not asked to
comment or to provide input on the preserve area boundary
lines. Similarly, several other species districts contacted
indicated that they did not have input on the preserve
boundary determinations.
15. Figure 3-1. All land use designations appear to have been
plotted. As indicated previously, we are concerned that a
working definition of habitat be developed for the purposes
of this document, as it is a frequently vague and often
misused term between the planning and biological arenas.
Ponds, recharge areas, and spreading basins provide habitat
but are clearly components of an active water management
program and/or facility.
16. Pg 3-14, Changes to the MHPA. OWO recognizes the concept of
making changes to the MHPA; however, there appears to be no
mechanism for correcting the recognition that the original
layout erroneously identifies lands under active use as a
reserve. For this reason, it is expected that the vast
majority of the changes that will need to be made will not
result in a "higher biological value" but will rather remove
lands from the MHPA without replacing additional lands.
17. Pg 3-26 and following pages for Table 3-5. It is very
important to note that the percentage of points, percentage
of polygons, or percentage of major populations in the MHPA
are only estimates based upon what has been surveyed, and
~ ~ )d/02f
OWD's Detailed Response to the Draft MSCP
June 12, 1995
the degree in which surveys were conducted. As a result,
preservation may be based more on the intensity of the
survey effort rather than the actual distribution or
protection of the plant and animal species on the whole.
18. The various assumptions and extrapolations made for the
California Gnatcatcher Population Viability studies should
be identified in the MSCP document because the preservation
of this species is one of the driving factors of the MSCP.
Specifically, if information is extrapolated to the
gnatcatcher from other species, or if numbers are assigned
based on "best professional judgment", this should be
identified.
19. Pg 3-46, Summary. A fourth category of MSCP participants
needs to be added for Special Districts. Local government
does not necessarily represent the interests of special
districts, and it should not be assumed that local
government is looking out for those interests in the MSCP.
Special districts such as OWD need be treated as regional
public facilities providers and this category must be added
to the listing.
20. Pg 3-49, Table 3-9. OWD believes that special districts
should be conducting similar management practices and
individual permitting as local governments, and that
mechanisms for preserve assembly and operations could be
similar to that for local government.
21. Pg 3-50 through 3-55. OWD is concerned that processing
permits through local entities would result in additional
costs for administration and mitigation fees for the
management and maintenance of lead agency mitigation areas.
In that own currently is a land steward in numerous areas
and manages its own land bank. Again OWD must be identified
a regional public facilities provider.
22. Pg 3-59 through 3-87. It is not clear where special
districts such as OWD fallout in the various options for
funding. In that special districts cover a wide portion of
San Diego County and own a significant amount of land, it is
extremely important that it be made clear in the MSCP
.~.
'1 '
( -
/j.. -.25
OWD's Detailed Response to the Draft MSCP
June 12, 1995
document and the
districts would be
local governmental
party.
Implementation Agreement
treated relative to being
agency, a state agency,
how special
considered a
or a private
23. Pg 3-78, Acquisition and Financing. It is extremely
important as to which of the various financing options are
legitimate and which would be practical to implement. OWD
is extremely concerned that adopting a program which is
financially infeasible is short-sighted, and that until
financing mechanisms can be more clearly identified, it may
be premature to act on approval of the MSCP.
24. Pg 3-86, Annual Fee on Water or Sewer Rates. At what level
is it anticipated that such a fee would be imposed, who
would collect the fee, and who would bear the burden of
managing the collection, and on what basis would the fees be
determined. OWD is opposed to levying fees through water or
sewer rates. Appropriate nexus must be established prior to
implementing fees and charges.
25. Pg 3-90, Plan Approval and Permitting Process
Implementing Agreements. own has a service area which
crosses numerous governmental boundaries and believes it to
be impractical to have to obtain take authorizations from
each of the entities involved. Further, it is an autonomous
agency not currently subject to the regulations of the
various other local jurisdictions. As a result, own
requires the development of an Implementation Agreement
similar to other utilities such as SDG&E and San Oiego
county Water Authority. We believe similar. special
districts crossing multiple jurisdictions may have the same
concerns.
26. Pg 3-93.
Group.
own wishes to be included in the MSCP Working
27. Pg 3-94, own wishes to be considered on a plane with
regional or sUbregion-wide responsibilities. This is
particularly important in that own I s service area crosses
multiple jurisdictions and it would be impractical to obtain
permits from each jurisdiction given the frequently
~ - ,),,/,.. );; ~.}.?
OWD's Detailed Response to the Draft MSCP
June 12, 1995
differing responsibilities and priorities among the varied
jurisdictions. Additionally, there is
could be adversely affected in
implementation if any given local
uncooperative.
a risk
cost,
agency
that projects
timing, or
were to be
28. Pg 3-95, 3rd paragraph. We believe that the definition of
local special districts (Le., which would not have the
option of direct implementation of the MSCP) is one that is
being proposed for OWD. This treatment by the MSCP is
considered to be unacceptable to OWo.
29. Pg 3-95, 3.4.6 Preserved Management--The MSCP Document
presumes that current owners will choose to continue to
manage their lands for habitat purposes. While OWO
currently owns considerable lands, some of which is in open
space and some of which has been established specifically as
a habitat bank, other options for long-term management
should be identified and the opportunity to elect to
continue to own and manage lands or to dedicate lands in
total with management responsibilities should be considered.
30. Pg 3-95, 3.4.6 Preserved Management, 2nd paragraph. A
considerable amount of on-going responsibility follows
reserved lands. It is important to identify in absence of
mitigation uses where funding for this reserve land
management is to be obtained and whose responsibility it is
to provide funding for management of public and private
lands.
31. Pg 3-96, 3.4.8 MSCP Plan Implementation Monitoring. As
previously indicated, OWO currently manages habitat bank
lands which follow an annual accounting, biological
monitoring program, and reporting program similar to that
outline. It should be noted, however, .that as written, the
implementation monitoring program is left extremely vague
and leaves up to local jurisdictions to develop the
necessary structure and responsibility for this monitoring
work. As in several portions of the document, details are
left out which are extremely important to identifying
responsibilities and costs necessary to evaluate the effects
HI
:;-r---
/,J ~o2 ?
OWD's Detailed Response to the Draft MSCP
June 12, 1995
of the plan on OWD. For these reasons, OWD continues to
express a desire to be involved in future planning meetings.
32. Pg 4-1, 4.1. 2 Designation of Preserve Management Zones,
paragraph 1. In order to provide clear assurances as to
what the designated preserves entail, buffer areas should be
included completely within the preserves and the preserves
should either be expanded to account for this buffer or it
should be assumed that there is a buffer zone which will be
degraded to some degree.
33. Pg 4-1, 4.1.2 Designation of Preserve Management Zones,
paragraph 2. It should be noted that numerous utilities
such as pipelines and power lines as well as a variety of
underground and above-ground cables cross those areas
designated as core preserves in the preliminary mapping. It
is important to recognize these utilities and the necessary
maintenance, upkeep, expansions and modifications which are
needed in order to serve their primary function.
34. Pg. 4-3, 4.2.1 Recreation, 3rd paragraph. It is suggested
that portions of the reserve system may be included within
National Wildlife refuge or National Wildlife management
areas. OWD would be opposed to designation of new reserve
lands under federal programs within in its service area.
This adds complexity and additional levels of bureaucracy
which could increase costs and difficulty in maintaining or
extending service facilities. It is suggested that lands
within the OWD service area be managed by local public or
private management agencies.
35. Pg 4-6. Again, OWD would recommend buffers be included
within the identified preserve areas and that buffer impacts
be considered as a part of the overall planning effort.
Vague buffers located outside the reserves are difficult to
manage and create additional conflicts due to ambiguity.
Further , it is noted that buffer areas are to remain in
original ownership. OWD has numerous property holdings,
including easements and fee title lands which occur within
areas designated as core biological reserve. OWD believes
that their rights and entitlements to these lands could be
significantly impaired by the designation of reserves
~_ )),-;26-'
OWD's Detailed Response to the Draft MSCP
June J.2, J.995
around and over such land holdings. OWO is concerned that
such designations may result in inverse condemnation of
lands currently utilized or having been purchased for
specific public facility purposes.
36. Pg 4-7, 4.3.J. Fire Management. OWD questions who will make
the determination as to the appropriate mechanism for fire
management around existing facilities.
37. Pg 5-3, number J., Costs of Complying with Mitigation
Requirements. It is identified that for the purposes of
analysis it is assumed that the total amount of off-site
mitigation would be 75% greater under the no-preserve
alternative than for preserve alternatives. Where did this
percentage estimate originate?
38. Pg 5-5, Federal and state Grants. What is the total dollar
amount actually committed as of today, from the federal
and/or state governmental agencies? Are these guaranteed
funds?
39. Pg 5-J.J., 5.4.J. Public Lands. It is important to identify
how the available acreage is to be allocated to the various
"essential public facilities."
40.
Pg 6-2, number 7c.
jurisdictions other than
public lands owned by OWD
It should be noted that local
OWD have no authority to designate
for conservation purposes.
41.
Pg 6-2, number J.O. The
subarea plan compliance
specified as to what this
terms "encourage subregional and
by special districts" should be
entails.
42. Pg 6-3, 2nd full paragraph. OWD is to be included as a
regional public facility provider in the MSCP.
43. Pg 6-3, 6.3 CEQA/NEPA Documentation. OWD would like to be
informed as to the availability and the comment period for
the joint-EIR/EIS.
44. Pg 7-2, 7.2 Alternatives Evaluated. It is indicated that
the MHPA was cooperatively designed by the J.2 participating
~ )cJ;2/
OWO's Detailed Response to the Draft MSCP
June 12, 1995
jurisdictions in the MSCP. It is clear that OWO's interests
have not been well-addressed in that there is no other
possible way to include so much of OWO's critical facilities
within the proposed habitat planning area. Again, OWO
wishes to be involved in a more proactive manner in order to
look out for its current and future needs in meeting its
obligation of providing water throughout its service area.
45. Pg 8-1, 8.1.1 Preserve. It is important to OWO to identify
specifically what utilities, types, width, conditions and
w~at limited water facilities would be authorized within the
preserve lands. Does this include maintenance of existing
facilities and new facilities? What restrictions would be
placed on the construction and operation of these
facilities?
46. Pg 8-3, number 1. OWO again believes the buffers should be
included completely within the designed, designated preserve
system and not an uncompensated extension of the preserve.
47. Pg 8-4, number 3. In absence of information on specific
roads affecting habitat or wildlife and current roadway
standards, OWO believes it is short-sighted to make broad
proposals such as reducing roadways to below current
designs. Further, it is important to recognized that
numerous roads that cross various proposed preserve areas
support utilities which may occupy a substantial portion of
the road-way right-of-way. These utilities must be
conserved and preserved in order for OWO and others to
retain viable service connections through these regions.
48. Pg 8-4, number 8. 2.1 otay Mesa/otay River Valley, number
3. The efficacy of this proposed design for culverts should
be reevaluated given the results on the highway 52 culvert
crossings following the same design.
49. Pg 8-21, 8.6.2 otay Lakes Exclusions. It should be noted
that OWO maintains pipe facilities that connect with water
utilities facilities and enter water utilities' lands in the
southern portions of the lower reservoir. These facilities,
as well as the proposed OWO interconnect alignment, should
be considered in the MSCP exclusionary areas.
~ /j-;JtJ
OWD's Detailed Response to the Draft MSCP
June 12, 1995
50. Pg 9-1 through 9-8, Section 9 Acknowledgments. It should be
noted that in reviewing the acknowledgment pages, in no
instance were any of the smaller special districts
represented in the MSCP process. All those districts and
utilities represented fall within the areas called "regional
public facility providers" and have been given special
status in the MSCP process. As a result, the concerns and
needs of special districts, including OWO have not been
adequately addressed in this document.
IMPLEMENTATION AGREEMENT
51. Pg 4. A definition of the term "habitat" as it relates to
MSCP should be included in the definitions.
52. Pg 8. 6.0 Mutual Assurances (a). OWO questions whether or
not the proposed MSCP would adequately cover the issues
under the Porter-COlogne Water Quality Act. It is also
concerned about CEQA issues for the protection of covered
species as a result of indirect effects; principally
focusing on watershed management and water quality as well
as contaminant management concerns. It is important to keep
in mind that the declines of the brown pelican and the
peregrine falcon had nothing to do with habitat loss and as
a result, we have to be cognizant of the fact that other
factors can result in impacts to the covered species.
53. Pg 9(c). It is critical to clearly define the phrase "so
long as the MSCP is properly functioning."
54. Pg 10, 6.5. OWO is to be considered as a regional public
facility provider in that it services multiple jurisdictions
and any given project may cross one or more jurisdictions in
its construction, operation and financing. Further, OWO
questions whether the phrase "shall encourage local special
districts to comply," indicates that individual permitting
through existing avenues within the various state and
federal acts will no longer be extended to the districts.
Also. absent cooperation of the local agencies, what
specific remedies are available to the special district to
ensure that their permitting needs are being met?
~ /~-J/
OWD's Detailed Response to the Draft MSCP
June 12, 1995
55. Pg 12, 6.12. It should be noted that OWD currently operates
an approximately 190 acre mitigation bank supporting Coastal
sage scrub and a variety of sensitive resources, including a
number of the proposed covered species. OWD plans to retain
the mitigation credits for this bank, which have not
previously been consumed by own or other projects. This bank
currently lies within an area identified as a "potential
biological core area" and is under the management of own at
this time and is not available as part of the MSCP.
56. Pg 16, number 11. The MSCP funding for state and federal
agencies should be prioritized along with other programs of
these agencies so that even if all budgetary items are not
fulfilled, other programs may be identified and cut prior to
state and federal funding of the MSCP. Further, the
budgetary request should include an identification of the
legal commitments to this program made by the state and
federal resource agencies.
57. Pg 17, number 13, Third Party Beneficiaries. It should be
noted that own and other special districts do not require
specific permitting by local jurisdictions and as a result
third-party beneficiaries for these special districts does
not provide any special coverage through the 12 identified
local jurisdictions.
58. Pg 19, 19.1 No Partnership. It should be noted again that
none of the 12 jurisdictions identified in the document as
"local jurisdictions" are authorized to speak and commit on
behalf of own.
own remains committed to regional habitat planning, however as
written the current draft requires considerable modification to
address the above issues and those detailed in the attachment.
own requests: 1) our issues be addressed in a new draft to be
recirculated for additional review and comment, 2) OWD be given
the opportunity to have representation at planning or working
group meetings, and 3) the MSCP and the Implementing Agreement be
coordinated more closely with all water agencies.
~ /j-J;J..
JLt-l-13-1995 15::37 FROM 5BIJO
TO
96915171
P.B2
Attachment 4
solll .." TX6fltI a- a E*1rk
....., . "'" oe&GO. 010...'1:- .,.,.....
PU NO.
IU. 1', 1915
10:. ao:b JAi~ar, 1'1amalD9' Dlr~tor
City o~ Chula vla~.
an J'o\U"t1l avella\la
Cbula Vi.~a, cali~orlll.ia '1'10
laJZC'1': lC8Ci, City of Ch\lla Vbb ...lte91oul
.1_
Dear Jb:. Leit.r:
% _"arataae tbat ~a a\l:bj.ot p1_ iladpa~aa ll>Oll'a .l.fUal
l\I:b.bU.OD pll:Opert,. a. "8tu4y :.r_". .ale luatatio. ."party i.
1Do1\l4a4 ilia 'H'B'. Sl1:b-reqioDal pl_ ueS ~ar.foZ'e all_I" :ba
_ol\l6aG ntiZ'aly fr_ aD)' .a.191Ul~ioD ill. tba CJnIla \'late plaD. a
eadtutioa Of "laot a part" wouleS II. aoceptaJill. to '"'B.
U you _"fa &lIl.l' quaaUoDs req&Z't18i our poaltioa oa ~a ..ttar,
pl.... qi," .. a eal1 .t ,..1-2.0'.
:17l~
D L. Ro.., 8r. L&lIl.d
1'1&l1l.Dw
Dalllj'
.01 lI.vida Bu'Ia.., aHIE
~1_. ~1u, 11)(1'.
.
-~ /j-J;J
TOTFlL. P.B2
_____. JI.J.l-13-'95 TLE lil6:a8 10:
TELt<):
ll029 1'01
BUIWING INDUSTllY
ASSOCIATION Of
UN DIEGO COUNTY
l1li a_...MtI Driwt. Sub A
"'lllIgD,CAIZ1ZlNl8i4
~1t)_1221
,All: 110.1111) "IM"5
PRESIDENT
__ A. GroIIl
'"" ~ ..~..
Cllmpany
VICE PRESIDENT
IIn M, Gill
Highland Partnmhip. 1m;.
June 13, ]99S
Honorable Shirley Honon, Mayor
City ofChula VISta
276th Fourth Avenue
Chula Villa, California 9]9]0
RE Review of Multiple Species Conservation Progranl Draft Plan and EIR
CllIlll ~=~ Dear Mayor Honon and Members of the Chula Vista City Council.
Con\inenl8l Home6
Sl:CRETARY
Merle D. McMillin
M\lMIlltn Communil...
On beha1fofthe Building Industry Association of San Diego County, I would
like to present the attached BIA Boerd ofDireetor', Resolution.. OUT iDduMry's
general response to the Multip]e Species Conservation Prolfam. It is our Wng
that our concerns are simi1ar to those concerns which your city and other
participating jurisdictions already have.
EXECVTIVE
VIOl! PAeSlDeNT
PIIII A. Tryon
Specific;aUy, we believe some recommendations need to be made by Chula Vista
to the City of San Diego for revision of the currently drafted document.
C:-lrvoIion Ind",t,\,
FIICltrIticn
~8uilding
lncIuolry_lion
NIlionoI_ietjon
0I_8..clel1
1) In the absence of state and I or federal funding, the size and scope of the
preserve should be downsized accordingly. This process should oc:cur sooner ..
opposed to later in .. much .. the promises mad. by the resource II-ea which
have been working on the MSCP program are unlikely to materialize.
2) A me<:haniun for review of the program shouIcI be develQpecl and a
timeline of three years established to determille the MSCP', viability and
elreetiveness in relation to potential legislative changes and more lilcely the lack
offundias from either tbe federal. lIIte, or local level.
3) ExaQion methods, popuIariud prior 10 the aotioa of coDStitutioJlll
compeIlIItion for "takinp" of private property, lhouJd not be used to obviate the
need for public financing IIld acquisition. MI1igatiOll ratioslhould reprnvt the
partnership by which this program was started. AIIything leas than the oripIal
''three-legged'' concept is not acceptable.
4) Assurances and teverability ofthe program are absolutely eaentiallo
anyone's "buy-in" or sign-orrfor the program (at the public or private level).
-~ /d:JY
rfi
~13-'9S TlE 06:09 to:
TEL i'():
lI029 P02
MSCP lleIponse
June 13, 1995
Pas, Two
S) Buffers or orber "set.baclc" mtcria IDIIJt be e1iminlled from the MSCP doc:wnent and Ifty
city resuJation which may ,ovem land-use related to the MSCP. RPO's and other dcsip c:riterIa
like "bruth llIIfta8ement" should be incorporated into the preserve design and not r epl ~t
Iftorber taki"8 of private prOperly.
6) Managementlftd maintenance _ or regulations which would require either on praerved
open apace must not be accepted. Once land is "tlklll" either ill a fee transaction or by re&ulatory
actions all care, maintenance, and management should be born by the rqulltory aacncy (or by the
MSCP program). All costs for this action should be incorporlled into the MSCP public funding
costs.
7) No map overlays, general plan amendments, or other government actions which would de
facto downzone property should be undertaken until the financing ponioll of the program is
eIlIbJished.
8) Any subarea plan should have had a concerted don made to eliminate small propeny
owners from the onerous regulatory designs of the MSCP. Furthennore. a mechanism must be
eatablished by which property owners CIft escape the MSCP when it becomes evident the local
jutiJdiction ClftDot "buy them out."
In conclusion, the BIA linnJy believes the current draft of the MSCP is too big, too expensive.
and will ultimately prove to be unworkable in a practical SIIlSe. Measures to address the possible
need for downsizing the program should be undertaken now, and actions which may destroy
private property land values should be avoided until the reality of public opinion and suppan
becomes known.
Thank you for the opportunity to address these concerns. If you have any filrther questions,
please do not hesitate to contact me It 450-1221.
Sillcerely,
~. (6.,~
Benedetto
ive Advoclle
-,J? - /j,- 33
JLtl-13-'95 TLE 06: 10 ID:
TEL I<l:
ll02'3 P03
. .
RESOLUTION
Building Industry AIaociation of San Diego County
Board ofDirecton
April 27, 1995
Multiple Species CouervatioD Procram
WBElU:AS. the City of San Diego, in coqjunction with the CoIInty of San Diqo and other 10eaI
jurisdi~OIII, bav. embarked upon the p1annina and implementation of a realon-wide babitat preservation
proaram c;urnntly IaIown as the Multiple Species CollMl'Y1dion Prosnm (MSCP) to cOmply with Itate and
federal andangered apecies laW; and
WllEREAS, the MSCP's current boundaries of 164,000 acres includes publicly held and privately held
IIDd in both incorporated cities and the unincorporated area of the County, and the total cost of land
Ic:quisitlon and maintenanc:e of this preserve I)'Ilcm il estimated to exoeecl $SOO million; and
W$REAS, the Building Industry Association of San Diego County has continued to IUppon the ooneept
of habitlt plwing II long IS it &cilitates the c:enainty and expedience ofland use p1anning during the .
pII'IDittjns process; Ind
WHEREAS, the City of San Diego has released it'l draft ofMlyor Susan Golclina'l a1tematiYe plllllling
JIIidelines and preserve boundaries for public review and comment; and
WHEREAS, the building indultry il concerned witb the protection of the propeny ripts ofprivlte
landowners under the c;urnnt prognm; and
WHEREAS. the repon prepared by the City lac:ks substantial suppon for its conclusions IS to proJTIITI
administration, economic impact, costs, and public funding;
NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that while the Building Industry Associalion orsan Diego
County, Inc. does continue to suppon the concept ofhabitat planning, and believes it may be of benefit to
ihe public, it doel not and ClMot support the recent draft of the Multiple Species Conservation Prosram,
unless and until the following issues haYe been adequately addressed:
1 , State and federal funding sources mUll be determined prior to progi'am adoption and these funding
sources must be ratified by the elected bodies who determine the bucfsetary outcomes ofthe
aforementioned funding.
2. Lo~ jurisdictions must analyze and establish the fimdraising sources, including any tax increase, to be
undertaken in this region, &ad prior to actual implementation, be prepared to dowIIIize the PlOJTllTl
due to insufficient revenue. Other issues, IUch 15 preserve manasement and bureaucratic upsizina must
also be addressed locally,
3. Prior to adoption of program, assurances &om the resource agencies reprdins future IistiDp and
tutur. statute c:han,es mull be incorporated into the MSCP.
4. Prior to adoption, the KJeVerability" of the dowment IIIUSt be confirmed and thilllVel'lbility IIIIlIt be
allowed should anyone of the participants not comply with their requinmentl or the need for the
JII'OII'am has ohanged due to Ilate or federallqlslative eIlan8es.
5. RPO's and other mandatory ordinances must be fiIIIy analyzed to ensure they do not add additional
resulatory layers and duplication.
6. This program shall not include the charging offees or other exactions designed to compensate or
directly pay for the maintenance of mitigated or exacted land for use IS open space,
'z3 u~ Ji- ~ 3/
-.-
Attachment 5
H. Ernest Schnepf
3672 Valley Vista Rd.
Bonita, California, 91902
June 12, 1995
Mr. Bob Leiter
Director of Planning, City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Ave" Chula Vista, Ca. 91910
Dear Mr. Leiter,
I received notice of a Public Hearing by the City
Council of Chula Vista, California for the purpose of
considering the Multiple Species Conservation Program,
(MSCP). The planning agencies have included my parcels
591-200-06 and 591-200-09, property which I have owned
since the late 1950's, in MSCP. I do not want them there.
Parcel 591-200-06 is approximately 1 Acre. My house,
garage, car port, patio cover, and two out-buildings are
located on this parcel.
Parcel 591-200-09 is approximately 2 3/4 Acres. It
is mostly cleared, and is pasture for horses for which
the property is zoned.
Both of these parcels are cleared and maintained to
protect my buildings from the fire hazard created by brush
build-up in the park land. The brush in the park land has
grown to a point where it causes flooding of private
property adjacent to it. This brush shOUld be cleared so
that the water could flow as it did in the late 1970's.
This would also eliminate the fire hazard it creates.
I am requesting that my properties, 591-200-06 and
591-200-09 be excluded from the MSCP Project. I ~o not
need any more government controls that I already have. ~he
entire private property inClusion in MSCP North of the park
land between WillOW and Bonita PLaza Blvd. is unneeded and
not wanted by the adjacent property owners. This is Horse
property, not park land.
. . /1~~cerelY yours,
~~~
.:....31-= /~ -:J? H. Ernest Schnepf
---.----.
,
\<
~ /~-3Y
Attachment 6
!:H
REALTOR'"
San Diego Association of REALTORS.
2231 Camino del Rio South 16383 Bernardo Center Drive
Post OlIice Box 85586 San Diego, Celnomia 92128
San Diego. Celnomla 92186-5586 Telephone (619) 592-7171
Telephone (619) 291-3714 FAX (619) 592-7179
FAX (619) 295-1365
MLS (619) 291-5060
... .... ~ - ...
May 30, 1995
Mr. Douglas Reid
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Dear Mr. Reid:
The San Diego Association of REAL TORS@ has reviewed the Multiple Species
Conservation Program (MSCP) Draft Plan and understands that it offers a
comprehensive approach to the implementation of the State and Federal Endangered
Species Acts (ESAs) by establishing a habitat preserve sufficient to protect 57 species.
The San Diego Association of REAL TORS@ (SOAR) however, believes strongly that the
Endangered Species Acts (ESAs) need major revisions to bring into balance the
protection of the local economy with the protection of truly endangered species.
Given the current status of the ESAs, SOAR has the following comments on the MSCP
Draft Plan objectives.
. To preclude the need to list more species as endangered or threatened:
The MSCP will cover 57, or more, species. If a species not covered by the MSCP
is listed as endangered by the state or federal governments, development in the
region will be disrupted. SOAR recommends that the Plan should guarantee that
no additional species be listed from the Plan's inception for a substantial number of
years until the Plan is monitored for its impacts. To do this the federal and state
governments must agree that future listings will not impact development. .
· Enable and facilitate economic development on lands not designated for habitat
preservation:
SOAR agrees that development of lands not designated for habitat preservation
must be pennitted and facilitated. However, the only issue facing development in
or outside the preserve that will be "enabled and facilitated" will be biology and,
therefore, other environmental constraints could be used to hinder and limit
development. To assure economic development can proceed, jurisdictions must
ease development constraints on property outside the preserve.
-~ Ji--J9
REALTOR" -IS a registered ma~ which identiftes 8 profeSSional in
real estate who subscribes to a strict COde of Ethics as 8 member
of the NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF REAL. TORse.
(!)
=.=-:
Page 2
City Council Letter
MSCP Plan
t
\,
. Regional growth and economic prosperity:
The Plan speaks to economic prosperity but each and every one of the Plan's local
public finance options would, in our opinion, harm the economy. A parcel tax, in
particular, would negatively impact property owners and housing affordability.
SDAR does not believe that the MSCP offers a benefit worthy of increased taxation
on property owners who have lost substantial value in their properties due to the
depressed real estate market and surrounding economy.
The Association believes the Draft Plan should contain a full socioeconomic impact
report to review the lost opportunity costs for reduced property taxes due to less
development, the Plan's suggested increased costs to property owners who would
share a larger burden for MSCP land mitigation costs, and the increased costs to
taxpayers for maintaining open space and enforcing habitat protection programs.
The Association has been meeting with individual legislative staff to brief them on the
Association's position on the MSCP Plan. We look forward to appearing before the
City Council, the County Board of Supervisors and SANDAG to answer any questions
regarding the San Diego Association of REAL TORS(!ll MSCP Plan analysis and
recommendations.
Sincerely,
~~~
John Lomac, Jr., President
San Diego Association of REAL TORsl!li
~2/tJ .
Attachment 7
COMMENTS OF RESOURCE CONSERVATION COMMISSION
ON TIlE DRAFI' MSCP AND ElRlEIS
Meeting of June 12, 1995
I. SPECIES WHICH ARE NOT "COVERED" BY n. SPECIES WHICH ARE "COVERED" BY,1IE
1"HE DRAFT MHPA PLAN AND SHOULD BE DRAFT MHPA PLAN AND SHOULD N0T BE
COVERED COVERED
. Brodiaca ftlifolia' . Rosa minutifolia'
. Chorizanthe orcuttiana . Ar.anfhllmintha'
. Caulanthus stcnocarpus . Button celery'
. Hemizonia conjugens2 . Orcutts birds beak'
. Navarretia fossalis' . Pocket mouse'
. Orcuttia californica I . Belding Savannah sparrow'
. Pogogyne nudiusculal . Clapper railS
. Cactus wren . Least ternS
. Golden eagles, burrowing owls and . Snowy plover
grasshopper sparrows2
[NOTE: The RCC is concerned that if the . Least bells vire06
high-risk species are not preserved, one of the
main problems the MSCP is attempting to
solve will not be solved (losing more species).]
. Orange throated whiptail'
. Fairy Shrimp'
. Homed lizard'
. Tri-colored blackbird
~
This fact is an indication that vernal pools are IIOt being adequately preserved.
This fact is an indication that native grasslands are not being preserved. Native grasslands are
at high risk with this plan.
Removal of these species from the "covered" list is recommended due to the Draft Plan's
inadequate data base and need for further study.
J
,
Removal of these species is suggested unless there is better coverage of known populations.
5
The plan does not contribute to the preservation of the species so they shottld not be considered
covered .
6
Insufficient preservation of riparian areas supponing this species.
_~ /b-~/
. The RCC's preference is that the preserve design be modified to include known populations that
currently fall outside of the preserve design.
. The RCC would lilce to see "in-concept" a multiple species conservation plan adopted and
encourage the City of Chula Vista to work with the resource agencies and developers to
protect the quality of life in Chula Vista.
. Designate the vernal pool area on the Otay RaDCh north of North Point as a special study
area. Both the preservation of Acanthamintha and the button celery need further study.
t! The Lower Otay Ranch area from the south to the southeast ponion to the Lower Otay
Lakes does not provide a functional preserve design.
. The state of completion of the HCP for the Sweetwater River is unknown. Is there
currently a draft plan and can it be incorporated into the MSCP?
. There is a high level of probability that the gnatcatchers will not be preserved which is
one of the major purposes of the MSCP. With some of the other species, what the City
of Chula Vista does may not impact the long-term viability but it does with the
gnatcatcher.
. Many covered species are counting on the wetland protection through the Army Corps
of Engineers permitting. How will we be assured that covered wetland species will be
preserved through this process?
. A priority system of land acquisition should be developed to encourage in-kind mitigation
whenever possible.
. The land use designation for the golf courses to the west of the Sweetwater Dam should
retain its linkage capability as open space.
. Watershed management plans are necessary in conjunction with the adoption of the
MSCP to prevent adverse downstream impacts to the preserve. The adverse impacts
usually result in a high level of tnaintenance and upkeep of the downstream preserve at
great expense to the City.
~ /1,-1/02
COMMENTS ON THE EIRlEIS
. Page 131 - The last paragraph. The EIRlEIS references two areas (over 1,000 acres in
size) that are being changed from low density residential land use to preserve. The
document needs to specify what specific areas are being described.
. Would like to see Figure IS overlaid with the MHPA for evaluation purposes.
. Would like to see all the preserve alternatives overlaid with the vegetation community
(Figure IS).
-~ Jd--'!.J
-~ /,? -/-/'Y
Attachment 8
Chula Vista City Council
276 Fourth Ave.
Chula Vista, CA
June 13, 1995
Dear Councilmembers,
It became clear to me while attending the June 13 meeting that
there is a lack of knowledge of what species are to be covered by
the MSCP preserve. Any non-covered species will still be subject
to Federal and State Endangered Species Acts. Without
modifications of development plans in Chula Vista, the list of
species that are not covered is long.
It includes: Orcutt's birds-beak, Variegated dudleya, Otay tarplant,
San Diego goldenstar, Narrow-leaved nightshade, Hermes copper butter-
fly, Quino checkerspot butterfly, Arroyo southwestern toad, California
red-legged frog, Southwestern pond turtle, Northern harrier, Cooper's
hawk, Swainson's hawk, Ferruginous hawk, Golden eagle, Burrowing owl,
Coastal cactus wren, Western bluebird, Grasshopper sparrow, California
mastiff-bat, American badger, Mountain lion, and potentially Little
mousetail, Prostrate navarretia, California orcutt grass, and Otay mesa
mint. U.S. Fish & Wildlife has already submitted comments concerning
coverage of other species that the plan lists as covered.
I recently saw a list of species U.S. Fish & Wildlife is willing
to cover if issues at Otay Ranch and San Miguel are appropriately
dealt with. That list included: San Diego thornmint, Variegated
dudleya, Orcutt's bird's-beak, Otay tarplant, Narrow-leaved
nightshade, Coastal cactus wren, California gnatcatcher, and
Grasshopper sparrow. They will not agree to cover those species
without agreements on development on lands in Chula Vista. It is
critical that the planning department and developers continue
negotiations as the preserve will do Chula Vista little good if
all the species listed above must be subject to current or future
listings.
Wetlands, vernal pools, grassland habitat, and oak woodlands are
not adequately protected by the preserve and additional coverage
of these habitats is required for the preserve (note habitats can
be chosen such that they also protect species listed above). Many
of the bird species listed above require grassland areas such as
was shown in slides of areas suggested to be of little habitat
value. It is important that the planning department carefully
review discrepancies with the current preserve design. When you
consider that most of our houses in Chula Vista have been built
~coastal sage scrub, you begin to understand the depth of impact
the City has already created. .
Sincerely,
,
~ ~. a <:)-:C--..e
Cindy Burrascano
771 Lori Lane
Chula Vista, CA 91910
_~ /"~L//
-~ /d-L//
Attachment 9
REVISED DRAFT
June 16, 1995
Dave Flesh
Advanced Planning Section
Metropolitan Wastewater Dept.
600 B Street, Suite 500
San Diego, CA 92101
Subject:
Final Draft Multiple Species Conservation Program (MSCP) Plan
Dear Dave:
Thank you for the opportunity to review the Public Review Draft MSCP Plan. The City of
Chula Vista's comments include concerns raised by the Planning Department, Fire Department,
Community Development Department, Department of Parks and Recreation, Otay Ranch Project
Team, City Attorney, Resource Conservation Commission, and various property owners, and
have been reviewed by the City Council. I am attaching a copy of the City Council Agenda
Statements regarding this matter, which provide further explanation regarding many of our
comments.
Given the large number of unresolved issues regarding the draft MSCP Plan, we are requesting
that the City of San Diego provide us with additional time to resolve these issues prior to
completion of the final EIR/EIS for this project. We would like to meet with your staff at your
earliest convenience to discuss the status of these issues in further detail, and work with you to
develop a time line for resolution of these issues.
GENERAL COMMENTS
1. Multiole Habitat Planninl! Area Boundarv
As discussed in the attached Agenda Statement, we have several major issues with regard
to the draft Multiple Habitat Planning Area (MHPA) boundary for the Chula Vista
General Plan Area which are unresolved. Based on our evaluation to date, we are
requesting that the following modifications be made to the MHPA boundary for the
Chula Vista Planning Area:
1) Areas which have already been placed in preserve ownership, or which already
have SPA Plan or equivalent level of approval, should be given a "90% preserve
area" designation;
~ /d-1/7
/
Dave Flesh
-2-
June 16, 1995
2) Areas which have not received SPA Plan level approval, but for which draft
conservation agreements are currently being prepared, are being designated as
"future 90% preserve areas," and would be redesignated as "90% preserve areas"
once written agreements among the wildlife agencies, City, and property owners
are obtained;
3) Areas which are designated in the City's General Plan as "open space," but which
do not meet the criteria above, are being designated as "special study areas," and
their designations will be refmed through further analysis to be conducted at the
subarea plan level to determine the extent of resources to be protected and the
feasibility of acquisition;
4) Areas which are designated as "open space" in the General Plan, but where it has
already been determined that the area is not appropriate for inclusion in a habitat
preserve system due to its isolated location or other non-preserve use, are being
removed from the MHPA boundary at this time.
Attached is a map which shows these designations (see Attachment B).
Based on the current status of resolution of those issues, we are also requesting that the
City of San Diego provide us with additional time to accomplish the following:
a) continue discussions with the wildlife agencies, County of San Diego, and
property owners to resolve preserve design issues pertaining to Otay Ranch, and
enter into a preliminary written agreement regarding preserve design for this
project;
b) continue discussions of a similar nature regarding preserve design issues for the
San Miguel Ranch project, and enter into a preliminary agreement for this
project;
c) identify other properties within our Planning Area which are currently proposed
to be designated as "special study areas," where subarea plans could be prepared
relatively quickly and such areas be redesignated as "90% preserve areas" in the
final Plan;
d) complete a draft subarea plan for the Chula Vista Planning Area, taking into
account the other actions described above.
~ /j,~~r
Dave Flesh
-3-
June 16, 1995
2. Financinl! and Preserve Assemblv
As discussed in our Council Agenda Statement, we feel that a significant amount of
additional work is required in order for a viable overall financing and preserve assembly
plan to be completed.
Specifically, we feel that the Policy Principles approved by the MSCP Policy Committee
on June 2 which deal with "Financing" (principles 8 - 12) need to be directly addressed
in the preparation of the final draft MSCP Plan, and would note that the conservation
targets which are suggested in Principle # 10 cannot be fully determined until further
clarification is obtained on other aspects of the financing plan, such as state and federal
shares.
We also feel that the issues regarding I!overnance of a regional financing program, as
well as other aspects of regional plan implementation, have not been adequately
addressed in the draft Plan. Prior to making any commitment toward a regional funding
source as described in Policy Principle # 12, we would need to have a better
understanding as to what regional entity (existing or new) would be responsible for
making policy decisions regarding such a program, and how it would be administered.
We also request that any such funding program be evaluated in the context of other
regional facility needs (e.g., regional transportation) which may require similar types of
funding programs in the future.
Finally, at the MSCP Policy Committee meeting on June 2, a representative of the
USFWS made two important clarifying points related to Plan financing and
implementation:
1) the permit authority granted to any single jurisdiction through the MSCP Plan will
be limited, to the extent that a local funding source is established at the time the
implementing agreements are approved;
2) USFWS will be asking for status reports regarding implementation plans from all
participating jurisdictions at the time the final MSCP Plan is completed, and will
be evaluating the status of each jurisdiction's "interim loss permit" authority
under the 4 (d) rule at that time.
In response to these points, we would like to receive further clarification regarding the
level or amount of incidental take is to be determined and allocated, both on a short-term
and longer-term basis.
'/3./ J/_2.c/'l
-l.-' - /fp 7(
Dave Flesh
-4-
June 16, 1995
SPECIFIC COMMENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION AND OVERVIEW
. Page 1-3, Figure 1-2, depiction of the jurisdictional boundary of the City implies
that the City has land use control over the port lands, lands owned by the school
districts, and the water districts, which it does not. (Pllinning)
2.0 DESCRIPTION OF MSCP STUDY AREA
. Page 2-10, The Plan implies that the core area is not fragmented. The Eastern
Chula Vista core and linkage areas include many developed areas which are
shown on the MSCP Plan. This needs further examination in light of the plan's
goal that 70-80% should be useable and that according to page 3-43, "If
percentages of each core area included in the preserve design are less than 70 to
80 percent, then the difference must be justified with biological data showing that
biological viability and functions are being maintained, as appropriate for selected
species and habitats." (Planning)
3.0 CONSERVATION PLAN
. Page 3-2, Covered Species - A provision should be added that would allow for
the automatic extension of the City's take authority to those species that are
presently "covered" by the MSCP but have not yet been listed as a protected or
endangered species under the Endangered Species Act. In addition, the federal
and state government should not be allowed to ask for new mitigation measures
for such species. The Model Implementing Agreement only provides that the
MSCP shall be deemed to be adequate to support an application for such a
permit. This means that any time an additional covered species is subsequently
listed as protected or endangered the City would have to apply for a new "take"
permit. (Attorney)
. Page 3-9, Provide an overlay of the plan with species locations for all of the
alternatives and include in the report. (Resource Conservation Commission)
. Page 3-34, There are several bay species that are not covered and no additional
protection for numerous covered species is being provided through the MSCP;
hence, they should not be covered or the Port District should be requested to be
an active participant in the program (list of species on page 3-24). (Resource
Conservation Commission)
//v - /,? ~ p/J
L. /
Dave Flesh
-5-
June 16, 1995
. The RCC's preference is that the preserve design be modified to include known
populations that currently fall outside of the preserve design.
. The state of completion of the HCP for the Sweetwater River is unknown. Is
there currently a draft plan and can it be incorporated into the MSCP? (RCC)
. Many covered species are counting on the wetland protection through the Army
Corps of Engineers permitting. How will we be assured that covered wetland
species will be preserved through this process? (RCC)
. A priority system of land acquisition should be developed to encourage in-kind
mitigation whenever possible. (RCC)
. Watershed management plans are necessary in conjunction with the adoption of
the MSCP to prevent adverse downstream impacts to the preserve which will
require a high level of maintenance and upkeep at great expense to the City in
perpetuity. (RCC and Staff)
. Page 3-42, Based on Table 3-8, the probability of extinction after 200 years of
implementation of the MSCP does not meet the goals established in the draft plan.
(Resource Conservation Commission)
. Page 3-43, the draft MSCP identifies "biological core areas" and "linkages" and
further requires that the preserve design include 70% to 80% of these areas. The
identified core areas and linkages affect every major current Community
Development project, including the Midbayfront project, the MCA
Amphitheater/City Corporation Yard, the Veteran's Home, the Lower Sweetwater
Valley project, and properties along the Sweetwater and Otay Rivers between 1-5
and 1-805. Three major issues exist with respect to the application of preserving
a specified percentage of habitat within these areas. First, all of the corellinkage
areas include land within other jurisdictions. Limitation on development within
these areas would require allocation of allowable development percentages by
jurisdiction or be complicated by oversight by a regional authority. Second,
resource quality varies from one core/linkage area to another. It does not seem
reasonable to apply a blanket percentage of preserve area to all core/linkage areas
since some resources may require protection of not only the resource area, but
a substantial buffer from development as well. Others may require direct
protection of the resource, allowing a significantly greater proportion of
development. Third, some corellinkage areas contain a greater quantity of habitat
than others. For instance, some core areas may be laced with developable land
while others contain more contiguous habitat. Universal development limitations
would not recognize these differences. (Community Development and Planning)
. Page 3-43, Although it appears that the core/linkage areas have been established
for solid habitat planning reasons, the actual boundaries appear to be quite
general. Community Development has a great concern over application of
specific limitations on development within these imprecisely delineated areas. We
~ /~~p/
Dave Flesh
.
-6-
June 16, 1995
would suggest that the core/linkage concept be retained as a preserve planning
tool, but that there not be a limitation on development within those areas as
currently depicted in the draft plan. (Community Development)
.
Pages 3-43 and 3-95 discuss that the covered species are "open to change
depending on biological data" yet the implementing agreement says otherwise.
This is general and vague; the plan should defme how new data should be
incorporated upon agreement between participating agencies. (Resource
Conservation Commission)
.
Page 3-43, Pampas grass should be listed as invasive exotic plant. (Resource
Conservation Commission)
.
Page 3-45, Buffer Areas - The plan calls for adequate buffers depending on
adjacent land uses and resources. They indicate edge effect studies suggest a
minimum of 150 feet. More information is needed on the location and use of the
150-foot buffer. The general development plan for the Otay Ranch includes a
requirement for an Overall Design Plan. An element of this plan is a dominant
skyline landscape treatment. Some specific landscape materials in this plan may
be in conflict with the MSCP. (Otay Ranch)
.
Page 3-45, Preserve shape that minimizes edge effects (p.3-45) - The Otay Ranch
Preserve area has detailed studies that justify the preserve boundary . Vertical as
well as horizontal separation should be considered between the development area
and the preserve. (Otay Ranch)
.
Page 3-45, Management Feasibility - Land uses within and adjacent to preserve
have to comply with compatibility guidelines. These guidelines need to be
reviewed in relationship to the Otay Ranch GDP/SRP. (Otay Ranch)
.
Page 3-65, Compensating Mitigation - The Otay Ranch has already determined
"compensating mitigation" as part of the Phase 1 RMP and will further identify
specific mitigation under Phase 2. Avoidance, impact lDinimi7.ation and
replacement have all been determined in the RMP. We are concerned that
additional mitigation will be required beyond the requirements of the RMP.
(Otay Ranch)
Page 3-67, Although this section deals with the public fmancing of long-term
maintenance of natural habitat, would it not be appropriate to include funding that
would cover the cost of brush management as well. (Fire)
.
Page 3-90, paragraph 1, it will be important for us in the future during the
Implementing Agreement and Subarea Plan stage to assess the impact of the
MSCP Plan upon the City's existing and future infrastructure and public works.
Also, it will be important to examine whether certain infrastructure systems, such
as sewer or other utility lines will be accommodated within the planned habitat
areas. (Public Works)
~
Jj, ~>.J-
Dave Flesh
-7-
June 16, 1995
. Page 3-90, the second paragraph under Section 3.4.1 titled Subarea Plan
Approval indicates that subarea plans may be prepared by developers using the
adopted MSCP Plan as a framework plan and incorporating its guidelines. Since
the boundaries of the biological core areas and linkages is not clearly defmed in
the MSCP Plan, there may be a conflict between the developers' subarea plan and
the city's plans of Infrastructure, Public Facilities and Circulation Element
development. (Public Works)
. Page 3-90, Subarea Plan Approval - We are concerned as to whether the Phase
2 RMP will satisfy the Subarea Plan requirements. Criteria for the subarea plan
needs to be established to ensure the RMP is consistent with the wildlife agencies'
plans for subareas. (Otay Ranch)
. Page 3-95, Preserve Management - Additional information is needed on the
Preserve Management to ensure the Otay Ranch Preserve Owner Manager is
consistent. We are concerned about conflicts with the goals of the Otay Ranch
GDP for the Preserve Owner Manager. (Otay Ranch)
. Page 3-95, MSCP Plan Amendments and Data Base Updates - The Otay Ranch
Project Team is concerned about adding additional species to the Plan after its
adoption. The Otay Ranch has a 30 to 50 year build out and needs more
assurance these rules will be consistent and not changed. (Otay Ranch)
. Page 3-96, Annual Accounting and Biological Monitoring - The RMP requires
monitoring and reporting on the preserve. We are concerned about consistency
in reporting standards and that efforts not be duplicated with the Phase 2 RMP
reporting. (Otay Ranch)
,11 "
~ I
/j,-p';J
Dave Flesh
-8-
June 16, 1995
4.0 COMPATmLE LAND USE ACTMTIES AND PRESERVE MANAGEMENT
GUIDELINES
. The land use designation for the golf courses to the west of the Sweetwater Dam
should retain its linkage capability as open space. (RCC)
. Page 4-1, Some activities listed for inclusion or exclusion make sense, and some
don't. Of concern relating to the Otay VaIley Regional Park is the identification
of the placement of active recreation in the buffer zone. This mayor may not be
possible in the western reach of the regional park where the concept plan is
proposing recreation directly adjacent to existing development to north, and the
riparian zone of the south. An insufficient buffer zone occurs here to
accommodate active recreation based on the requirements and descriptions in the
text. (Parks & Recreation)
. Pages 4-2 through 4-4 - How was Table 4-2 on page 4-4, areas of compatible
land uses, compiled; i.e., land fiIl is used as buffer but could bring other feral
animals; utility roads are not compatible with preserve; low density residential is
compatible with preserve. How is compatibility determined? Exercising a pet
in a preserve is not compatible with endangered species. (Resource Conservation
Commission)
. Page 4-3, Hang gliding, off-road vehicles, and other land use compatibility issues
should be reviewed. (Resource Conservation Commission)
. Page 4-3, It appears that the MSCP will not preclude the JEPA and the City of
Chula Vista from utilizing the Otay Valley as a portion of the "Greenbelt" and
the OVRP. Specifics regarding the proper location, site planning and impacts of
active recreation is an issue that will have to be addressed to determine if the
areas that have been indicated on the OVRP Concept Plan for recreation are
acceptable. (Parks & Recreation)
. Page 4-4, Section Four of the document contains a section that addresses the issue
of land uses in the Core Area, Linkages and Buffer Area. Table 4-1 and 4-2 list
uses for general activities and recreational activities, respectively. The text and
Table 4-2 lists recreational activities that mayor may not be compatible or
conditionally compatible with the MSCP Core, Linkage and Buffer areas. (parks
& Recreation)
. Page 4-5, Single houses, cattle grazing, agriculture, and streets are considered
compatible in the plan. However, they are a major conduit for the spread of
invasive species and should only be aIlowed in coordination with exotic species
removal programs. (Resource Conservation Commission)
. Page 4-5, Roads change the management requirements due to edge effects, "swath
of death" (a term used by some biologists referring to an area where animals may
~ /j'5~
Dave Flesh
-9-
June 16, 1995
be killed), increase access to preserve areas in such a major way that it should be
addressed. (Resource Conservation Commission)
. Page 4-7 - Guidelines for Preserve Management Activities - Fire Management -
To fire officials, this section is most critical. Fire Management Plans should be
detailed and very specific. (Fire)
. Page 4-9, the fencing standards described here are not consistent with the fencing
for the Otay Ranch listed in the Overall Design Plan. (Otay Ranch)
. Page 4-11, Management plans are also identified as a requirement of the MSCP
Program. How would this requirement "mesh" with the OVRP and Otay Ranch
Preserve Owner Manager Programs? (parks & Recreation)
. Page 4-17 - This is an area where fuel management is mentioned, but not in the
context of brush management and hazard abatement. (Fire)
6.0 STATEMENT OF ASSURANCES, IMPLEMENTING AGREEMENT, AND
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION
. Page 6.0 - Liability - There are a number of liability issues with respect to
implementing the MSCP. As a result of the recent Supreme Court decision of
Dolan v. Citv of Thmd, 94 D.A.R. 8803 (June 27, 1994), the Endangered
Species Act has come under intense scrutiny. Consequently, we can not predict
with a great degree of certainty the outcome of a challenge to the MSCP at this
stage of its development. However we do know that such a challenge would be
expensive to litigate and if the City was to receive an adverse judgment, it could
be quite costly. In addition, the MSCP requires the City as well as other
jurisdictions to design mitigation policies which could result in permit exactions
being imposed that may be held by a court of law not to be roughly proportional
to the project's impact. In essence the federal and state governments are
spreading the risk of liability from a "takings" downwards to the local
jurisdictions. Our office has repeatedly requested that the federal and state
government indemnify the City. This request has been refused. At the very
least, the federal and state governments should provide the City with an opinion
or a representation in the Implementing Agreement regarding the legality of the
MSCP and its implementation. (Attorney)
. Page 6-1, Statement of Assurances - This section should also address brush
management for life safety considerations. (Fire)
. Page 6-1, Assurances - A defmition of extraordinary circumstances is needed to
understand when additional species or land might be added to the Plan. The Otay
Ranch, as a long-term project, needs certain assurance that the Plan wilI remain
consistent. If the biological data is updated every year, is there the potential for
extraordinary circumstances. (Otay Ranch)
_ 17': Ji-Y3
Dave Flesh
-10-
June 16, 1995
8.0 CITY OF SAN DIEGO SUBAREA PRESERVE PLAN
. The success of skylights at road crossings is not known at this time. Please
provide performance studies for the success of skylights at road crossings as used
on Route 52 prior to their installation. (Resource Conservation Commission)
. Page 8-21 Section 8.6.2, paragraph 2, states that "The Olympic Training Center
is planned for the west side of Lower Otay Lake." The text needs to be corrected
to indicate that the majority of the project has been graded and some area
developed. (Planning)
. Page 8-21, Inclusion of a Subarea Plan for San Miguel Ranch, Otay Ranch,
Eastern Territories and the Rivers and Bays of Chula Vista are needed. These
are being prepared for submittal. (Planning)
A MODEL IMPLEMENTING AGREEMENT
. On page 12 of Attachment A - The Model Imolementinl! Al!reement, the Plan
states that "Local jurisdictions and other participating local jurisdictions shall
determine whether or not geographic and in-kind mitigation requirements will be
waived for any particular public or private development project." The inference
here is that the plan as it is proposed can be adopted even if some of the
jurisdictions involved choose to not participate. If that occurred, a new plan
would be needed. (Planning)
. Attachment A, page 2, Imolementation Al!reement - Key exhibits that were to be
attached to the document including the Assurances Policy and the Specific
Biological Monitoring Obligations are not included. They need to be included.
(Planning)
. Severabilitv - The Model Implementing Agreement should include a severability
clause which would provide the City with protection from the actions of other
participants in the MSCP. In other words, the City should have a guarantee that
its "Take" permit would not be jeopardized by the actions or inactions of other
local jurisdictions. (Attorney)
. Withdrawal - The Implementing Agreement should include a provision that would
allow the City to withdraw from the MSCP should federal or state laws or
regulations change. This is particularly important because of the recent
discussions by the Legislature regarding the future of the Endangered Species
Act. In addition, should the federal or state government require modifications to
the implementation of the MSCP due to "unforeseen circumstances" the City
should have the right to withdraw from the MSCP. (See the comment on
unforeseen circumstances below.) In addition, our withdrawal from the MSCP
should be allowed without penalty or liability and there should be a guarantee that
our withdrawal would not impact previous "take" permits issued by the City and
relied on by property owners. (Attorney)
-sC~ /~~
Dave Flesh
-11-
June 16, 1995
. Page 9, Unforeseen Circumstance - The Model Implementing Agreement gives
the federal and state govermnent too much discretion to change the terms of the
MSCP. Specifically, the Model Implementing Agreement provides that the
federal and state govermnents could seek additional mitigation from the City if
there is an "Unforeseen Circumstance." The term "unforeseen Circumstance if
far too ambiguous and should be more strictly dermed. In addition the City
should be allowed to withdraw from the MSCP if we disagree with a subsequent
change in the terms of the MSCP. (Attorney)
. ProDerlv Functioning - The Model Implementing Agreement provides that
additional land or financial compensation or other form of mitigation will not be
required so long as the MSCP is "properly functioning." Therefore it is critical
that the term "properly functioning MSCP" be dermed to our satisfaction in the
Implementing Agreement. (Attorney)
. Annexed Lands - We will need to clarify in our Implementing Agreement how
annexed lands will be handled. Currently, the federal and state govermnent has
represented that take authorizations can only apply to land within the land use
jurisdiction of the local entity. We will need to clarify that once land is annexed
to the City, the City's take authorization will automatically apply to that land and
that we can include this land in our subarea plans. (Attorney)
We have provided you with only our preliminary review of the MSCP and Model
Implementing Agreement. We anticipate having additional questions and
comments upon our further review of these documents. (Attorney)
. Attachment A, Page 12 - Several references were made to "non in-kind
mitigation"; the plan's priority system of land acquisition should be determined
and compensation through like-kind mitigation required when possible. (Resource
Conservation Commission)
. Page 13, Funding - The local jurisdictions are being requested to provide a far
greater level of commitment to fund the MSCP than either the federal or state
govermnents. In fact, the Model Implementing Agreement does not adequately
obligate the federal or state govermnent to provide funding for the MSCP. In
addition it is unclear whether a lack of funding by the federal or state
govermnents would be considered to impact the "proper functioning" of the
MSCP. (See comment 7 below.) It is our understanding that federal officials
have represented that the local jurisdictions would not be "harmed" if the federal
govermnent should not be able to adequately fund the MSCP. However this
representation is not reflected in either the MSCP or the Model Implementing
Agreement. Perhaps, the preserve land requirements should be decreased if the
federal government is unable to adequately fund the MSCP. In addition, a
provision should be added that the funding responsibilities of the federal and state
govermnents shall not have an impact on the "proper functioning" of the MSCP.
(Attorney)
~ jj-5/
Dave Flesh
-12-
June 16, 1995
Letters of comment which were forwarded to the City of Chula Vista for your information and
direct response are also attached, along with the City Council agenda statement which includes
additional comments from the RCC.
If you have any questions on the above, please feel free to contact me at 691-5101, or Barbara
Reid, Associate Planner, at 691-5097.
Sincerely,
Robert A. Leiter
Director of Planning
Attachments:
A) City Council Agenda Statement, dated June 20, 1995
B) Map showing proposed revisions to MHP A boundary for Chula Vista General Plan Area)
(m:\home\planning\nancy\flesh.llrl
_~- L --
/d-/P6
Attachment 10
June 16, 1995
John Kovac
City of San Diego
Development Services Department
Development & Environmental Planning Division
1222 First Street; Mail Station 501
San Diego, CA 92101
Subject: Draft Joint EIR/EIS Multiple Species Conservation Program
Dear Mr. Kovac:
Thank you for the opportunity to review the above sited document. Our comments are as
follows:
Page ES-17
Biological Resources. Development of 400 acres of active recreational
uses in the 0tay Valley within the boundaries of the 0tay Ranch along
with the various transportation facilities crossing the valley will be
reviewed as Sectional Planning Areas within the Otay Ranch General
Development Plan are reviewed for this area. This subsequent review will
assure the greatest reduction of any potential environmental impacts.
Public Services/Facilities. The various public facilities shown on the
Chula Vista General Plan will be the subject of more detailed
environmental analysis when specific design and/or development proposals
are available.
Page 13
The implementation of the MSCP by the City of Chula Vista may involve
more than amendments to the Planned Community (PC) zoning standards.
Other more conventional zone classifications may also have to be
amended.
Page 83
Fire Protection. The Fire Department has indicated that this section of the
EIR/EIS is vague and should specifically address the issue of brush and
fuel management. The Fire Department will also be reviewing with more
specific plans issues relating to: 1) siting of fire stations; 2) staffmg; 3)
slope conditions; 4) brush management; and 5) water supply.
IJ .:- /;; ".P7
John Kovac
-2-
June 16, 1995
Page 119
Figure 27. The residential development shown on the southern part of
Otay Rio Vista Business Park was not approved as part of that project
and, therefore, those development areas should not be depicted on this
figure.
Page 201
City of Chula Vista. At the end of the paragraph following the first
bullet, there is an apparent typographical error duplicating several lines
unnecessarily.
Page 227
Table 39. This table should reference Figure 7 on page 36 and utilize the
same number and lettering system.
Page 239
City of Chula Vista. Please note our previous comments regarding the
transportation facilities crossing the Otay Valley. Additionally, in the
paragraph following the first bullet, the reference to Otay Lakes Park
Road should be changed to Otay Lakes Road.
The comments below are from the City's Resource Conservation Commission.
Page 131
The last paragraph. The EIR/EIS references two areas (over 1,000 acres
in size) that are being changed from low density residential land use to
preserve. The document needs to specify what specific areas are being
described.
Figure 15
The RCC would like to see Figure 15 overlaid with the MHPA for
evaluation purposes.
Figure 15
Also, the RCC would like to see all the preserve alternatives overlaid with
the vegetation community (Figure 15).
If you have any questions about any of these comments, please feel free to contact me at 691-
5101.
Sincerely,
Douglas D. Reid
Environmental Review Coordinator
(m:\home\planning\nancy\EIREIS .com)
~ :r'l .L'
//'-ttJ
Attachment 11
LISTING OF PROPOSED CHANGES TO
"REVISED MULTIPLE HABITAT PLANNING AREA" MAP
(Numbers Correspond to Numbers on Map)
I. The Otay Water District "use parcel" north of Salt Creek Ranch is proposed to be deleted from the MHPA
boundary.
2. The SDG&E Miguel Substation site has been given a designation which denotes that this area is being
planned through a subregional plan being prepared by SDG&E for all of its properties in the MSCP study
area.
3. Properties owned by Mr. H. Ernest Schnepf and other developed properties adjacent to the Sweetwater
Regional Park are proposed for deletion. In addition, the Sweetwater Regional Park is proposed for
designation as a "special study area" to allow further evaluation of specific uses within this area.
4. Areas in the Eastlake General Development Plan which are proposed for urban land uses or open space
uses which do not require preservation of native vegetation are proposed for deletion.
5. The area south of the Otay River and east of Heritage Road was previously shown as a combination of
development area and 90% preserve. Although this area is within the Chula Vista General Plan
boundaries, a portion of this area is within the City of San Diego. These areas are outside the Otay Ranch
plan boundaries. There is very little information regarding the resources present, and there are multiple
ownerships in the area. Therefore, it is proposed that this area be redesignated as a "special study area. "
6. The area within Poggi Canyon (north and south of E. Orange Avenue) east of Paseo Ranchero was
previously recommended for 90% preservation. The Otay Ranch General Development Plan depicts this
area for contour grading and revegetation with natural vegetation. This is not appropriate for preservation
and the map now proposes deletion of this area from the 90% preserve.
7. The southern portion of the Glen Abbey cemetery property is proposed in the MHP A for a 70 %
preservation. There are some maintenance facilities for the cemetery at this location and there is little data
available. Therefore, it is proposed for a special study area.
8. The Port District Wildlife Island has been added to the preserve map at 100% because it was inadvertently
covered by the darker bay water cover. This area is located in San Diego Bay at the southwestern comer
of the jurisdiction.
9. There is a very small (7.5 acre) area to the east of the Salt Creek Ranch near the inverted "L" of the Otay
Ranch completely surrounded by broad areas of proposed development. The designation of this small area
as 70 % preservation is not appropriate and should be changed to a development area.
10. There is a development area delineated in Salt Creek near the Otay Valley that was retained from a
previous plan and should be deleted.
II. The open space area along Proctor Valley Road to the east of Salt Creek has been modified to reflect the
adopted plans for Salt Creek Ranch and Eastlake.
(m:\home"fllannill&\nancy\mhpl..n:v)
~//t-k)
f rg ~ /d--~:I
Chula Vista Planning Area
Revised Multi~le Habitat
Planning Area Boundaries
~
.. 100% Habitat Preserve Areas
.. 90% Habitat Preserve Areas
.. 80% Habitat Preserve Areas
"-"-"1
'_.._...1 70% Habitat Preserve Areas
~----1
L___.1 Special Study Areas
L "--1 Preserve Area Deletions
.;.;;;;;;;...____.J
~~~ Future 90% Habitat Preserve
'~$) (subject to conservation agreement)
* This a~a being addressed in
"SDG&E Subarea Plan"
General Plan Boundary
~Vt-
irfi
"""......--..~
City Boundary
1 0
I.-
1
2 Miles
01Y Of
CHUlA VJSrA
J?/tf
6/16/95
GEOOIlAPHIC INfOlllllAnON SYSTlM
I
I
ATTACHMENT 12
REVISED MULTIPLE HABITAT PLANNING AREA BOUNDARY MAP
J/; ~j,i-
Chula Vista Planning Area
Revised Multi~le Habitat
Planning Area Boundaries
~
.. 100% Habitat Preserve Areas
.. 90% Habitat Preserve Areas
.. 80% Habitat Preserve Areas
"-"-..1
l_.._..j 70% Habitat Preserve Areas
;----1 .
!.....:~_J SpeCial Study Areas
f---"~ Preserve Area Deletions
.......;...;.......J
Future 90% Habitat Preserve
(subject to conservation agreement)
This area being addressed in
"SDG&E Subarea Plan"
General Plan Boundary
~Vt.
:~~
.~-t~~
"""""'- ...... ~
01Y Of
0iUlA VISTA
City Boundary
1
I..
o 1
2 Miles
GEOGRAPHIC INfOllMATlOI'I SYSTEM
jt -I.,,?
6/16/95
I
ATIACHMENT 13
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT OF 6/13/95
(With Attachments A Through Q)
/j,'~%
SE\T BY:LfH&S VOICE> 235-3541 6-20-95 2:22PM
fAX> [619)232-8311~
4765379:# 21 7
LUCE, FORWARD, HAMILTON & SCRIPPS
ATTOIlNEYSAT L^w . POUNDED 1873
CIlAIG 1:. BEAM, 'uTH..
DIUCl D... NUll... (619) 699.2482
June 19, 1995
Client Matter No.:
11200-00001
VIA FACSIMILE & U.S. MAIL
Honorable Shirley Horton
Mayor of the city of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, California
Honorable Members of the. City council
of the city of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vieta, California
Re: The city of Chula Vista's Comments on the Multiple Species
Conservation Program/Council Agenda Item 16/ June 20, 1995
Dear Mayor and Council Members:
You have previously received testimony with respect to the city
of Chula vista's participation in the Multiple Species
Conservation Program ("MSCP") Plan.
Katy Wright. Project Manager for EastLake Development Company,
has pointed out a number of factual inaccuracies associated with
the proposed Plan where it depicted natural resources in the
Plan's Exhibits which were not present on the ground.
The purpose of this letter is to note the legal requirements
which the MSCP Plan proposes for all participating "Local
Jurisdictions" as set forth in the "Model Implementing
Agreement/Management Authorization" and "Statement of Assurance."
The last two documents (which are in the MSCP Plan book) when
read together, reauire the City take certain actions, consistent
with the MSCP Plan, which appear to violate California law and
potentially place the city in an awkward. if not legally
indefensible position.
/~~~J
600 WUT BaOADWAY. S\;,ITI! 1600 . SAN DllGo. C.ulFORNIA 92101 . TlU'HONI! C61,) 1:"'.1:4.'-4: . 'ACllMID (lliL.2.ll.Bll
SE~T BY:LfH&S VOICE> 235-3541 6-20-95; 2:24PM; fAX> (619J232-8311~
4765379:# 4/ 7
LUCE, FORWARD, HAMILTON & SCRIPPS
ATTORNEYHT LAw, FOUNDED 187)
Honorable Shirley Horton,
Mayor of the City of Chula vista and
Honorable Members of the city Council
June 19, 1995
Page 2
For example the .statement of Assurances. requires local agencies
to provide assurances to the wildlife agencies, by amongst other
things,
"Where appropriate;..amend[ing] [their] General and
C 't Pl' " .
ommunl y an,....
The "Implementing Agreement," page 15-2, also is intended to be
more than a general framework under which future land use
decisions would proceed. As required by the Plan,
"(T]he Implementing Agreement is a binding contract between
an individual local jurisdiction, the CDFG, and USFWS in
which all parties agree to specific action to implement the
MSCP Plan."
The text of the "Implementing Agreement" (Exhibit .A" to the
MSCP) clearly expresses the intent of the MSCP Plan,
"To contractually bind each Party to fulfill and faithfully
performed the obligations, responsibilities, and task
assigned to it pursuant to the terms of the MSCP
Agreement:...:" (See, 1.13B).
Most troubling is the contractual obligation of local cities to
undertake land use decisions in the future consistent with the
MSCP, including those
"necessary to implement to MSCP Aqreement, as described in
detail Section 7 of this Agreement." ( See, Section 6.2),
and those requiring that the local cities will contractually
commit to chanqes
lito (their] General Plan, other applicable land use plans,
and to existing zoning, as appropriate." (See, section 7.1).
Id ~?t?
LUCE, FORWARD, HAMILTON & SCRIPPS
ATTORNEYSAl LAW' FOUNDED r8n
Honorable Shirley Horton,
Mayor of the city of Chula Vista and
Honorable Members of the City Council
June 19, 1995
Page 3
The financial commitments of oities in Seotion 7 of the
Implementing Agreement require that local cities will take
"the steps that will be taken to permanentlv acauire and.
J:)reserve [undeveloped land described in the MHPA]."
Taken as a whole, these contractual obligations seem to clearly
ignore the legal limitations imposed upon the City of Chula Vista
in planning, zoning, and other land use matters. They also
ignore what may be financial limitations in the city's ability to
"acquire" property.
The city may not contract to in the future, change its General
Plan or re-zone land in accordance with a MSCP Plan. Even a
development agreement, authorized by California law, will not
allow a city to contract to provide a particular land use for an
area in the future.
The structure of the proposed Implementing Agreement also ignores
the existing oontractual cOmNitment made by the City of Chula
vista to landowners.
In the case of EastLake Development, the City of Chula Vista, in
retu~n for various benefits including the dedication of land for
the u.s. Olympic ~raining Center and various subsidies thereto,
has agreed in the EastLake III Development Agreement not to
modify the land use designation set forth in the adopted General
Development Plan for the area, nor to impose new rules,
regulations and policies different to those in existence at the
time the Agreement became effective.
The City's Planning commitments in the case of the EastLake III
Development Agreement, were made after the city followed all
state mandated planning proceedings including extensive hearings
and environmental analysis, for the planning and zoning of the
land in question: exactly the o~oosite of the process
contemplated by the Implementing Agreement.
/t --? (
SE\T BY:LfH&S VOICE> 235-3541 6-20-95 2:25F~; fAX> (619)232-8311~
4765379;# 61 7
LUCE, FORWARD, HAMILTON & SCRIPPS
ATTORNEYSAT LAW. FOUNDlO J873
Honorable shirley Horton,
Mayor of the city of Chula Vista and
Honorable Members of the City Council
June 19, 1995
Page 4
The obligations the city of San Diego requests the city Chula
vista contractually assume, pursuant to the MSCP Plan and
program, are inconsistent with those the City has already agreed
to in the EastLake III Development Agreement.
Under the IIAssurance Policy" and the obligation of a Local
JuriSdiction pursuant to the "Implementing Agreement," the City
or Chula vista will be reauired to modify its land use plans to
reflect the MSCP natural resources designations in various
exhibits of the Plan, and prohibit land uses the MSCP deems
"incompatible" with the Plan, notwithstandinq the land use
designations that are vested by the EastLake III Development
Agreement.
San Diego's proposal, pursuant to the MSCP, that portions of the
property within EastLake III are worthy of preservation due to
the biological value of natural resources on-site is not only
generally inaccurate, due to the absence of such resources, but
in any event even if they were present, contrary to the City's
obligations, pursuant to the Development Agreement, to preserve.
EastLake therefore request that, should t~e City of Chula Vista
determine to continue its participation in the MSCP, it inform
the city of San Diego it will not take any future planning action
with respect to EastLake which either adopts the MSCP's
description of natural resources on-site or requires the City of
Chula Vista take any planning action of the type contemplated by
the MSCP "Assurances Policy" or, Local Jurisdiction "Implementing
Agreement."
The city's future actions with respect to the area involved
should be governed by the existing EastLake General Development
Plan and Agreement. The area should be deleted from the MSCP
planning documentation and exhibits.
/tf; r 7-2
-
SENT BY-LfH&S VOICE) 235-3511 : 6-20-35 : 2:26P~: FAX) 16131232-8311-
1765373:11 7/ 7
LUCE, FORWARD, HAMILTON & SCRIPPS
ATTORNEYS "T L",., . FOUNDED 1873
Honorable Shirley Horton,
Mayor of the city of Chula vista and
Honorable Kembers of the city Council
June 19, 1995
Page 5
We will be pleased to provide you with any additional information
regarding the concerns raised. I remain,
very truly yours,
a~ K ;r:A~
Craig ~ B~---
of
Luce, Forward, Hamilton & scripps
CKB:cg
co: city Attorney Bruce Boogaard
Mr. Paul Nieto
Ms. Katy Wright
C:\DMS\CKB,DIR\71lZ611.wP
/ti> '~?y
FPOM :ESTR~D~ L~ND PL~NNINQ
61'3 236 0578
TO
1'3'35. 06-~
16192360578 P.02
15'1'3 ~1 ~.~:/~~
JUN-20-1995 02:18PM
F?OM
"'j
;# I(~
/'
. .~~
"'-..... ot........_ (P-) ~w.,,_. -_eo.,. (E>C),'" ~~/, ,-
U.S. 'iIh & W1Idllt'1I Seni~ (TJSFWS), IIIQ Ulc CI.Il1bnlla Dcpilrtmcnt (If'Fieh &: Game r;~~
(CDro) (la'ti.). 111e Paints ~ ~~ to be memoriallzed iI:L, ~ \.,\
AgTeerneut btt..cc:n \he PWliels &lllI11lc Chy ot~ VlS\a (CIty) in llw 00II\e:rit QfW
MlJltiple Species ~1I1ion ~''''ll CMJCP) Iubtrea Plan for tloe City.
PfJlNTS OF A GREEN'BN'l
J.... 211, 1.9~~
TheP~ _;
A. m>c ow:ll3 Sen~ ~ ~ ~ 1738.~ SO\IthPllt'Clll aM. an l,IS%-
IQ'll North Par..cl. Wlldl.ite apD.oalllCelld tQ IaI:IIf tM City Take ~~QlIS
which w~d pcmlt a~ to aIIClW E!'C to Tab ecvmd lpeotllll. Wild1I1'e aptcill8
ll\teQd. b- th.lmpleme..~ Qf 51l1l. ~qJ ~oII.'. poniqn of Clty'$ MSCP Subarea
Plan to repl! ~ AiI1 ~IUmne....nh the m'lllll_ of the tWmllDcI Cl!ll9rnJa
Ellillqll"ll:l Spec:iw ~ (!SA), tbe ~=1'lIl Collmlllllity Co~ PlaDninS Ac::t
aZId tAl C~ Nati've l'laDt r..A.Ciotl Adl.
D. To~~"biE.tyill4~pl._;..,tbrJill'C,ibePclUstJQr ~
pmiclt fbl' two ~ botmdary ~os >> be pt'IpIM tor Ib.c ~ lrfiil.1d lianch
~Qt\iOA ctb Clty'1 S~P1an.
C. T_two ..--...,.;"", an;
L Draft MBl'4 (II J .oW J)
The ~ alt--a.e ia d~ in FigJn I . and is ..A..~ to 18 the:Clt1lft
MWtiple Eallitlt Pl=..r". ARII (MBP~ 1IlIp. Thi.I altemative indiClltl!l no
d~Q1lmem on tnllmh pc'~ ;fSc: MilUsl1l2_h. Io m&Iw it ~le
to EP(:, the ~~pmelIl OIl :. 3eutll ~ wauId lIS to be ndesiglled to
yield abolU l,~ cfwtllloa umu. 'nIls 110. _...;." SlId ~ bioloJi.=!
~ ar. ~. lutbcwiId!iR ~oal
IJ. GDP (!ccwIo ~
This preserw &Illnatl", II .!""'~ in Ylpn ~ and 1$ ~ to 8J the
<knera! ~ PIc (GDP) Jt;1N~. nil a1~ti.." n:f1eot1lile
d~plMCt ~PnM113 fbr San ~ Rand1 ~ in 1m ~1l1!be Cil)',
blOt dQes not ~ tIss ~ b"l-.... tha wilcWk ~ alICI. EPC.
1). Take Autl>orizAt1omJ Ebt S<<lIarlD I ww1d be tbe .. u fbr tJiJs propoMC! MBCl' me!
Qt If'Pl'Cl,reO ~ ~ C'rty's Subarea P1an. For I<<1lariD ]I, .&PC would haYe to
Jeck Take ~:h~ through the ! ._ti-.lO(a)(1)~)otme WUIl El'd-~
Specle9 Act Uld &tQte Manapnllnt ~ ptWeIIllL
~
)~ --71/
JUN-c:1J-l':;:i'j::. :de:: l'if-'r.' 1--:1_'1'1
"'J"(un ;e.~lro:I-<UH LHNU "'l-,...NN.LNU
1;>1'= ..:!.-"b lZ7576
IU ~::,~~4d"':;b1J:;.t'CJ ",I::J..
~995,05-20 15:19 ~e81 P.02/0~
E. M1daallQn tor SlIn MIaud lWIch projet:l bklI~ impae:s in each "fthe two
aocnarios is u flillowr
L Dnft M:&PA: EPC WOIIld ~Idi~ ~ 106 ~ of the North
PlIl"C4Ite c!l'kt tb.e impa~ cf c!Iml"P'1laIt OIl the South PareeI aM. WQulll
all() IlflISeMJ ~:1 10"" ot~ TarpIaal on the South P&n:Il:L
The remainder 'Jf the N<><1h l~ ~ be a IliF priorityMSCp acq~o:l.
~.
II. OM': M1t1gatlon Ibr Illy ~ ~ IIIl eWK:r lizI: NWlh IiIf So\lth
))IU;ds would be cIe!trnIl!Ied u IIle tilDe WIIeII EP<:: prepared a Ccoa.uvatiOIl
Plan in SlljlJlClrt of its ESA S~ 100aXl)(8) peir'IDI1 app!icmcn IlI.d a Flail !;
Game Code S<<tinn201l ~a~~m ~Oft.
P. lftbe Draft MHPA ~o ii ilDptca.nled. the llabilat r.lIuc Qf ead:1 =e in ~
North Pvcel ullllllMlail fbr ~ Qf~QIl ~
O. It b amldpated dwl the ~ TIIlJllm, 00Jdc BqIe, 'N1Il'\hem 1hniec, Coopers
Hawk, iJl(j the Coaslal c.ctus WICl wW De ineNdell IS Covered Speeies In the
approve:! Ci!'f M!Q> SIIiarea p... ~Qed Illo 8gIIlCy-l ~~.....-led dlqe3 10
the MS CP huerve civlan 1ft adIlIYed and 8iIlWlIins the SCllllario ILl chclsen by
!PC. Thll buIoltvtl of~i6 llSI"ftti.1lc ~iJlCwitllllert3lmy ittbey
Nt u1detllo notd1 as prewve, lIIey IllIlI proc;ee.l with develllprnllllC of the 5CIlth
witllellt~~~~
II. ~ bIlelll1 Ul ~ alpFCllt efibru of&>e ell pin FOJ= approval from
C~, ISSuI'IIing ME:? A <<*IW is uaed u tile ~ct "tbotprillt" for tbe San
Mlgael J.aDcQ prlljeet. This ~ will iD;Nde lCltIn ill 8Uf'llQrt a:ld Ilppcarazll;eS at
pubic bewinp.
l Apndes ~Itdp ~ EJ'C IMII \JP tlw. tv punll' iIrtller to.l.i1!emenr.s for
b Nc:th P;r;eI ~ EPC's deC!e to 1'tI:CMl'1III VIIae ~ tilt estaze .IQt
devcloprllellt in tho North hn:d ~uF & ~ atp.... ,.. aeqliisition,
mitigation ~ Ill<! a redaIIiJI and GemrIIl'~ Amsat!.allllt on the South Farrel.
Ii an appTll,m,'lA-.ly 1,620-ciweJllna ISIlit fti1IlWle:lI! i& ~ by City 011 the SQUtIl
PIlClll, m>C wiIlllOl puaue keJarlo n:
1. E1'C Imwb W 00Qpera1' Nlly with ~ CIty aad wi1dIif;, SFncies in the dsveloplllllnl
of a MlCP Suhara Plan In c.i1lIa Villa, wlrldl wlI pmyidll the ~lIUlr)' ilmpgrk
!\:lr ~ ~ct. In the ewnt Cl~ does DOt If"~" ~MSO l~lInaPlan,
qcndu '9rilJ ~ withSPC 10 ~p projeQ~.t' Tab~ If. Ill;
!bat cIme, DC P\=ll= SceAttio r. tbe 'Mldlik '8 ~" wlIl warlt wIfJa m>c to
~~ " sublJr. pia'" ineluaoQ undcIr-lhe MliIQ> I.IIlII1reIl.s, nth.. ~ icilli
tiuJgb the mon:1alglhy HaOiIAt COllIeIYatioD Plan deveI~ prOQw;a.
/'
/ j, /13
~/"
cp
lo'~'
~~.
Pt
'v \.' L
\\Q\"'i\
JUN-20-1335 02: 13PM FROM
, ,_.. . ,--,. .......U/"'l l-/"lI....U I'"'l...Jo-<'NN I NG
TO 15132350578 P.03
519 236 0S78
1995,~6-~0 15;20 =081 P.03/04
,
K. tt & C~ A&i...e..-..t llLlllot ~ Iigncd ~ sbt I'<lOnths otthc Il8nini elate
of~ PoiDU or ~ U- all parties ~ Ie&ved <1f any elEpnci1 or implicit
obJiSaliollS noted In the Poillt; of A8teanem. hnie$ will \1M beat 6rts to conclude
DeSOtiatiOClS 011 tho ~nJO:Mit!oA A&r~ wftlDn tU aile UlOlllh perigd.
4"V~wlMpd:
:1i~~{ VI~ Y~IL~~'~
F~~J: LD-r '
AN.,.." ~: 1
T1DJtZ~"1Wt & W111111ll ~1n'Iclt
By . (J ~~i.~
/ iJ' Ck; ,(~r
~~~-f'"
t-Z.c.fS
TOm. P. eo
J~ -?~ .
TOTAL P.03
I
,
I.
"
I,
I'
,
II
I,
,
il'
II
il
i
I
,
II
"
I
Item 17
Date of Meeting: 6/20/95
PUBLIC HEARING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT PCC-94-09: REQUEST TO
EXTEND APPROVAL FROM A PRIVATE SCHOOL FOR
APPROXIMATELY THREE YEARS (THROUGH SEPTEMBER
1999) AND TO ALLOW THE EXPANSION OF SAID
SCHOOL FACILITIES INTO THE SECOND STORY OF THE
BUILDING LOCATED AT 2400 FENTON STREET WITHIN
THE EASTLAKE BUSINESS CENTER COVENANT
CHRISTIAN SCHOOL (Director of Planning)
staff recommends that this item be continued to 7/11/95.
-/7 -
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item / Ir
Meeting Date 6120/95
ITEM TITLE: Public Hearing: PCS-95-05; Tentative Subdivision Map for Parcel
R-28, Chula Vista Tract 95-05, involving development of 51 detached
condominium dwellings and located within the Eastlake Greens Planned
Community - Eastlake Development Company
Resolution / 71.15 Approving and imposing conditions on the Tentative
Subdivision Map for EastLake Greens Unit 28, Chula Vista Tract 95-05,
making the necessary findings and readopting the Mitigated Negative
Declaration and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for
SUBMITfED BY, ::: of PI""",,, ,~
REVIEWED BY: City Manager~ I:M~ (4/5ths Vote: Yes_ No_X_)
U---:?
The applicant has submitted a tentative subdivision map known as Eastlake Greens Unit 28,
Chula Vista Tract 95-05, in order to subdivide 6.0 acres of land for the purpose of developing
a gate-guarded residential community of 51 detached single-family condominium dwellings. The
project site is located along the north side of Clubhouse Drive between Greensview Drive and
Hunte Parkway and designated as Parcel R-28 within the EastLake Greens Planned Community
(see locator).
An Initial Study, IS-94-19 was previously prepared in conjunction with the recent amendment
to the EastLake Greens SPA Plan. The Environmental Review Coordinator has determined that
the project is in conformance with IS-94-19 and that no new effects could occur and no new
mitigation measures are required for this subdivision map.
RECOMMENDATION:
That Council adopt the Resolution approving the Tentative Subdivision Map for Eastlake Greens
Unit 28, Chula Vista Tract 95-05.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION:
On May 24, 1995, the Planning Commission voted 6-0 to recommend that Council approve the
subject tentative subdivision map for Eastlake Unit 28, in accordance with Resolution PCS-95-05
attached hereto.
/ 2"~ /
Page 2, Item -.I..K
Meeting Date 6/20/95
On May 12, 1995, the Zoning Administrator approved the development plans for the project
(DRC 95-29), subject to compliance with several conditions requiring site and architectural plan
modifications, and subject to approval of the tentative subdivision map by the City Council.
On April 11, 1994, the Resource Conservation Commission voted 5-0 to approve the Mitigated
Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program issued on IS-94-19.
DISCUSSION:
1. Site Characteristics
The 6.0 acre parcel is located within the Eastlake Greens Planned Community and has
been graded as part of the Eastlake mass grading program. The relative elevation of the
site to the street decreases from a west to east direction ranging from 16 feet above street
level at the most westerly point along the Clubhouse Drive frontage to 4 feet at the main
driveway access and leveling off at the most easterly frontage point. The property is
surrounded by variable landscaped slopes on all sides.
2. Zoning and Land Use
Site PC (Planned Community) - Residential Vacant (target density - 60 du)
North
South
East
West
PC (Planned Community) -
PC (Planned Community) -
PC (Planned Community) -
PC (Planned Community) -
Open Space
Residential
Open Space
Open Space
EastLake Golf Course
SFD /detached
EastLake Golf Course/Club
Eastlake Golf Course
3. Proposal
The proposed development involves minor regrading of the site, construction of 51
detached single-family condominium dwellings on building pads averaging approximately
3,000 sq. ft., and enhancement of the existing open space landscape buffer along the
south side of the property (Lot A-E). Staff is recommending that the development
proposal also incorporate the golf course trail improvements identified on the Eastlake
Greens SPA Trails Plan that are most closely associated with the project, i.e. the golf
course view point west of the property and the trail markers along N. Greensview Drive
and Hunte Parkway (see Draft City Council Resolution condition #27).
/8"')'"
Page 3, Item ) i
Meeting Date 6/20/95
4. Analvsis
The Tentative Subdivision Map will create five open space lots and four residential air-
space condominium lots. Private fenced yards are proposed to be allocated to each
dwelling unit in accordance with the attached landscape concept plan exhibit. The project
will be served by a private street/drive system. An undulating cul-de-sac (Palomira
Street) is proposed to provide access to the site via Clubhouse Drive constituting the
primary road within the subdivision. Palomira Street will be constructed to public street
standards and will accommodate the required guest parking in parking bays along both
sides of the street. Private drives off Palomira Street are intended to access courtyard
areas enhanced with decorative hardscape and landscape treatment around which the
majority of the units will be clustered. The remaining units will be arranged in a more
typical linear fashion along Palomira Street.
a. Compliance with EastLake Greens SPA Plan.
The project will have a density of 8.5 du/ ac. This is consistent with the Eastlake Greens
SPA Plan density range of 5-15 du/ac as well as with the target density (9.8 du/ac) and
target dwelling unit number (60 du) for the project site.
b. Compliance with Planned Community Regulations and Residential Design
Guidelines.
Development of the site is subject to compliance with the RC-lO residential district
property development standards. The majority of those standards are established by
approval of individual site plans in order to ensure proper site plan and architectural
design relationships and to provide adequate flexibility for the development of various
product types. The site plan and architectural design of the project has been considered
and approved by the Zoning Administrator subject to compliance with several conditions
requiring site and architectural plan modifications and subject to approval of this tentative
subdivision map by the City Council. The Zoning Administrator has found that the
proposed architecture and site planning for the subject project, as conditioned, will
positively contribute in the enhancement of the Eastlake Greens residential community.
Compliance with the applicable property development standards and residential design
guidelines has been ensured via the design review process.
c. Compliance with the California Vehicle Code.
Although the California Vehicle Code prohibits obstruction of any public street, gated
communities containing private streets can be approved. This project falls under the
aforementioned category where a gate-guarded entrance can be allowed. The reasons for
this are as follows:
1%']
Page 4, Item / ;(
Meeting Date 6/20/95
. The project site is a relatively small (6.0 acres), self-contained site which was
never intended to provide a link between segments of the public street system.
. The site setting precludes construction of a second access point due to existing
grade differentials.
. Access to and throughout the project site will be provided by private streets and
drives.
. The proposed access is adequate to handle the anticipated traffic load into the
project.
. The project has been designed so that potential stacking at the entrance will not
interfere with Clubhouse Drive.
d. Compliance with low and moderate income housing requirements.
The proposed project site is not one of the parcels identified for development of
affordable housing units, however the subject project will be taken into account in
determining the total number of low and moderate income housing units required to
fulfill the affordable housing obligation for the Eastlake Greens SPA. The project has
been conditioned to comply with all unfulfilled conditions of approval, inclusive of low
and moderate income housing conditions, for the Eastlake Greens Master Tentative
Subdivision Map and any subsequent amendments to those conditions.
FISCAL IMPACT: The costs of processing this request will be paid by the applicant from a
deposit account. The charges to date total approximately $4,000.
Attachments
1. Draft City Council Resolution
2. Exhibits: (Locator. TSM, Development plans, Eastlake Greens SPA Trails Plan)
3. Planning Commission Minutes and Resolution
4. RCC Minutes
4. Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program for 1S-94-19
5. Disclosure Statement
(m: \home\planning\pcs9505 . ccr)
/~~'i
RESOLUTION NO. J? 935
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING AND IMPOSING CONDITIONS
ON THE TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR EASTLAKE
GREENS UNIT 28, CHULA VISTA TRACT 95-05, MAKING
THE NECESSARY FINDINGS AND READOPTING THE
MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND THE
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM
FOR IS-94-19
I. RECITALS
A. Project Site
WHEREAS, the area of land which is the subject matter of this resolution is
diagrammatically represented in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein
by this reference, is commonly known as Unit 28 of EastLake Greens Tentative
Subdivision Map, Chula Vista Tract 88-3; and for the purpose of general
description herein consists of 6.0 acres and located on the north side of
Clubhouse Drive between Greensview Drive and Hunte Parkway within the
EastLake Greens Sectional Planning Area of the EastLake Planned Community
("Project Site"); and,
B. Project; Application for Discretionary Approval
WHEREAS, on March 31, 1995 EastLake Development Company (" Owner ") and
California Pacific Homes ("Developer") filed a tentative subdivision map
application with the Planning Department of the City of Chula Vista and
requested approval of the Tentative Subdivision Map for Eastlake Greens Unit 28,
Chula Vista Tract 95-05 in order to subdivide the Project Site into 9 lots
("Project"); and
C. Prior Discretionary Approvals
WHEREAS, the development of the Project Site has been the subject matter of
1) a General Development Plan, EastLake II (EastLake I Expansion) General
Development Plan previously approved by City Council Resolution No. 15198
("GDP"); 2) the EastLake Greens Sectional Planning Area Plan, previously
adopted by City Council Resolution No. 15199 ("SPA"); and 3) a Tentative
Subdivision Map, previously approved by City Council Resolution No. 15200
("TSM"), Chula Vista Tract 88-3, all approved on July 18, 1989; 4) an Air
Quality Improvement Plan, EastLake Greens Air Quality Improvement Plan
J~--S
(AQIP); and 5) a Water Conservation Plan, EastLake Greens Water Conservation
Plan (WCP); both previously approved by City Council Resolution No. 16898 on
November 24, 1992; and 6) a GDP, SPA, TSM, AQIP and WCP amendment
previously approved by City Council Resolution No. 17618 on August 16, 1994;
and
D. Planning Commission Record on Application
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held an advertised public hearing on said
project on May 24, 1995, and voted (6-0) to recommend that the City Council
approve the Project, based upon the findings and subject to the conditions listed
below.
E. City Council Record of Applications
WHEREAS, a duly called and noticed public hearing was held before the City
Council of the City of Chula Vista on June 20, 1995, on the Project and to
receive the recommendations of the Planning Commission, and to hear public
testimony with regard to same; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby find,
determine and resolve as follows:
II. PLANNING COMMISSION RECORD
The proceedings and all evidence introduced before the Planning Commission at their
public hearing on this project held on May 24, 1995, and the minutes and resolutions
resulting therefrom, are hereby incorporated into the record of this proceeding.
III. MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION REVIEWED AND CONSIDERED;
MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM; FINDINGS;
APPROVALS
A. Mitigated Negative Declaration
The City Council of the City of Chu1a Vista has reviewed, analyzed and
considered the previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration on IS-94-19
(known as Document No. C094-180 on file in the Office of the City Clerk) and
comments thereon, the environmental impacts therein identified for this project
and the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program ("Program") (known as
Document No. C094-181 on file in the Office of the City Clerk) thereon prior
to approving the Project. Based on the Initial Study and comments thereon, the
Council finds that there is no substantial evidence that the Project will have a
-2-
) g"~ ~
significant effect on the environment and thereby readopts the Mitigated Negative
Declaration.
B. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
The City Council of the City of Chula Vista finds that the significant
environmental effect(s) identified in the Mitigated Negative Declaration will be
reduced to below a level of significance if the mitigation measures in the
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program are implemented. The Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Program is hereby readopted to ensure that its
provisions are complied with.
IV. CERTIFICATION OF COMPLIANCE WITH CEQA
The City Council does hereby find that the Mitigated Negative Declaration on IS-94-19
and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program have been prepared in accordance
with requirements of the California Environmental Quality Act, the State EIR Guidelines,
and the Environmental Review Procedures of the City of Chula Vista.
V. INDEPENDENT JUDGMENT OF CITY COUNCIL
The City Council finds that Mitigated Negative Declaration IS-94-19 reflects the
independent judgment of the City of Chula Vista City Council.
VI. TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FINDINGS
A. Pursuant to Government Code Section 66473.5 of the Subdivision Map Act, the
City Council finds that the Tentative Subdivision Map as conditioned herein for
Eastlake Greens Unit 28, Chula Vista Tract No. 95-05 is in conformance with the
elements of the City's General Plan, based on the following:
a. Land Use
The proposed density of 8.5 du/ac is in compliance with the previously
approved EastLake Greens SPA Plan density range (5-15 du/ac) for the
subject parcel.
b. Circulation
All of the on-site private streets and drives and off-site public streets
required to serve the subdivision will be constructed or D IF fees paid by
the developer in accordance with the EastLake Greens Public Financing
Plan and Development Agreement.
-3-
18"7
The private streets/drives within the subdivision will be designed in
accordance with the City design standards and/or requirements. The
adjoining street system was designed to handle the anticipated flow of
traffic from this and other area projects.
c. Housing
The EastLake Greens SPA Plan area has been conditioned to provide a
minimum of 10% affordable housing including a mix of housing types and
lot sizes for single-family, townhouses, condominium and various
apartment densities that will provide a wide spectrum of housing prices for
persons of various incomes. The proposed single-family detached
residential housing type is consistent with the EastLake Greens SPA Plan.
d. Conservation
The Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program for IS-94-19 addressed the goals and policies of the
Conservation Element of the General Plan and found the development of
this site to be consistent with these goals and policies.
e. Parks and Recreation, Open Space
The project site is located within the EastLake Greens SPA Plan area.
The EastLake Greens SPA Plan provides public parks, trails and open
space consistent with City policies. The project will implement in part
conditions of approval for the EastLake Greens SPA Plan requiring the
provision/construction of a golf course trail.
f. Seismic Safety
The proposed subdivision is in conformance with the goals and policies of
the Seismic Element of the General Plan for this site.
g. Safety
The Fire Department and other emergency service agencies have reviewed
the proposed subdivision for conformance with City safety policies and
have determined that the proposal meets the City Threshold Standards for
emergency services.
-4-
/o~~
h. Noise
Noise mitigation measures included in the Environmental Impact Report
SEIR-86-04 and Mitigated Negative Declaration IS-94-19 adequately
address the noise policy of the General Plan. All dwelling units within the
project will be required to be designed so as to not exceed the interior
noise level of 45 dBA. Additionally, all exterior private open space will
be shielded by a combination of earth, berm, wall, and/or buildings to
achieve a 65 dBA noise level for outside private areas.
1. Scenic Highway
The project site is not located adjacent to any designated scenic highway
but a landscaped open space buffer and a decorative wall will be provided
along the Clubhouse Drive frontage in order to enhance the appearance of
the project from the street.
J. Bicycle Routes
Bicycle lanes have been incorporated within the EastLake Greens Planned
Community area design and are presently in use.
k. Public Buildings
No public buildings are proposed on the project site. The project is
subject to RCT fees prior to issuance of building permits.
B. Pursuant to Section 66412.3 of the Subdivision Map Act, the Council certifies
that it has considered the effect of this approval on the housing needs of the
region and has balanced those needs against the public service needs of the
residents of the City and the available fiscal and environmental resources.
C. The configuration, orientation and topography of the site partially allows for the
optimum sitting of lots for passive or natural heating and cooling opportunities
as required by Government Code Section 66473.1.
D. The site is physically suitable for residential development and the proposal
conforms to all standards established by the City for such projects.
E. The conditions herein imposed on the grant of permit or other entitlement herein
contained is approximately proportional both in nature and extent to the impact
created by the proposed development.
-5-
J%~1
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby approve the Project
subject to the general and special conditions set forth below.
VIII. GENERAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
The approval of the foregoing Tentative Subdivision Map which is stated to be
conditioned on "General Conditions" is hereby conditioned as follows:
A. Project Site is Improved with Project
Developer, or their successors in interest, shall improve the Project Site with the
Project as described in the Mitigated Negative Declaration IS-94-19 except as
modified by this Resolution.
B. Implement Mitigation Measures
Developer shall diligently implement, or cause the implementation of, all
mitigation measures pertaining to the Project identified in the Final Supplemental
Impact Report for Eastlake Greens FEIR-86-04 and Mitigated Negative
Declaration IS-94-19.
C. Implement the Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program
Developer shall implement, or cause the implementation of, all portions of IS-94-
19 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program pertaining to the Project.
D. Implement previously adopted conditions of approval pertinent to project.
Unless otherwise conditioned, developer shall comply with all unfulfilled
conditions of approval of the EastLake Greens Tentative Map, Chula Vista Tract
88-3 established by Resolution No. 15200 approved by Council on July 18, 1989,
and any subsequent amendment(s) to such Tentative Map condition(s) approved
by the City Council, the General Plan Amendment conditions adopted by
Resolution No. 17309 by the City Council on December 14, 1993, and shall
remain in compliance with and implement the terms, conditions and provisions
of Eastlake Greens Sectional Planning Area, Eastlake Greens Planned Community
District Regulations, the Eastlake Greens Development Agreement, the Water
Conservation Plan and the Air Quality Plan, Design Guidelines and the Public
Facilities Financing Plan.
-6-
J?~/O
E. Implement Public Facilities Financing Plan
Developer shall install public facilities in accordance with the Eastlake Greens
Public Facilities Financing Plan as amended or as required by the City Engineer
to meet threshold standards adopted by the City of Chula Vista. The City
Engineer and Planning Director may, at their discretion, modify the sequence of
improvement construction should conditions change to warrant such a revision.
F. Project Phasing
Developer shall submit and obtain approval for a development phasing plan by
the City Engineer and Director of Planning prior to approval of any final map,
if phasing is proposed within an individual map or through multiple final maps.
The phasing plan shall include:
a. A site plan showing the lot lines and lot numbers, the phase lines and
phase numbers and number of dwelling units in each phase.
b. A table showing the phase number, the lots included in the phase and the
number of units included in each phase.
Improvements, facilities and dedications to be provided with each phase or unit
of development shall be as determined by the City Engineer and Director of
Planning. The City reserves the right to conditionally approve each final map and
require improvements, facilities and/or dedications as necessary to provide
adequate circulation and to meet the requirements of police and fire departments.
The City Engineer and Planning Director may at their discretion, modify the
sequence of improvement construction should conditions change to warrant such
revision(s).
IX. SPECIAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
Prior to approval of the final map, unless otherwise indicated, the Developer shall:
STREETS. RIGHT-OF-WAY AND PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS
1. Design and construct all streets to meet the City standards for public residential
streets, or as approved by the City Engineer. Submit improvement plans for
approval by the City Engineer detailing the horizontal and vertical alignment of
said streets.
-7-
/ ((~ / I
2. The name of the proposed private street (Palomira Street) shall be changed to
"Corte Palomira" or "Palomira Court." Said modification shall be reflected in
the final map for the Project Site.
3. Locate the centerline of entry to the subdivision a minimum of 250' from the
centerline of the nearest street intersection.
4. Provide a turnaround of 28' minimum radius at the private street entrance to
subdivision or as approved by the City Engineer.
5. Provide decorative pavement delineating the boundary between the public and
private streets.
6. Install a pedestrian ramp on the south side of Clubhouse Drive opposite the
northwesterly corner of Corte Palomira to City Standards. Design all pedestrian
ramps, including those on private property, in accordance with City standards.
7. Relocate the existing street light on Clubhouse Drive to the northwesterly corner
of Corte Palomira.
8. Align the public sewer to be outside of fenced areas.
9. Design public sewer with the minimum radius for 8" diameter PVC sewer to be
280' ("Greenbook" table 306-1.2. 13(C)).
10. Sewer mains on private street and connection to eXlstmg public sewer in
Clubhouse Drive may be public. All other sewer lines are to be private. Provide
City access through gated entry for public sewer maintenance.
11. Provide a minimum 12' wide improved access designed to H-20 wheel loading
to all public sewer manholes.
12. Connect the water line serving the subdivision to the eXlstmg water line in
Clubhouse Drive at a more direct point of connection westerly of the proposed
point of connection.
13. Guarantee the construction of all public improvements (street lights, sewers, curb
and gutter, sidewalk, pedestrian ramps, utilities, etc) deemed necessary to provide
service to the subject subdivision in accordance with City standards.
14. Provide to the City a letter from Dtay Municipal Water District indicating that the
assessments/bonded indebtedness for all parcels dedicated to the City have been
paid or that no assessments exist on the parcel(s).
-8-
)%-/.2
15. Present written verification to the City Engineer from Dtay Water District that the
subdivision will be provided adequate water service and long term water storage
facilities.
16. Design and construct all required water facilities in ,accordance with Dtay Water
District standards and pay all appropriate water fees.
GRADING AND DRAINAGE
17. Provide an updated soils report or an addendum to the original document prepared
by a registered engineer, as required by the City Engineer.
18. Submit and obtain approval by the City Engineer for an erosion and sedimentation
control plan as part of grading plans.
19. Submit letters of permission to grade for all off-site grading.
20. Submit a list of proposed lots indicating whether the structure will be located on
fill, cut, or a transition between the two situations.
21. Submit an updated hydrology report for the project.
AGREEMENTS
22. Agree that the City may withhold building permits for the subject subdivision if
anyone of the following occur:
A. Regional development threshold limits set by the East Chula Vista
Transportation Phasing Plan have been reached.
B. Traffic volumes, levels of service, public utilities and/or services exceed
the adopted City threshold standards.
C. The required public facilities, as identified in the PFFP or as amended or
otherwise conditioned have not been completed or constructed to
satisfaction of the City. The developer may propose changes in the timing
and sequencing of development and the construction of improvements
affected. In such case, the PFFP may be amended as approved by the
City Planning Director and Public Works Director.
23. Agree to defend, indemnify and hold harmless the City and its agents, officers
and employees, from any claim, action or proceeding against the City, or its
agents, officers or employees to attack, set aside, void or annul any approval by
-9-
) tr'):3
the City, including approval by its Planning Commission, City Council or any
approval by its agents, officers, or employees with regard to this subdivision
provided the City promptly notifies the subdivider of any claim, action or
proceeding and on the further condition that the City fully cooperates in the
defense.
24. Agree to hold the City harmless from any liability for erosion, siltation or
increase flow of drainage resulting from this project.
25. Agree to ensure that all franchised cable television companies ("Cable Company")
are permitted equal opportunity to place conduit and provide cable television
service to each lot within the subdivision. Restrict access to the conduit to only
those franchised cable television companies who are, and remain in compliance
with, all of the terms and conditions of the franchise and which are in further
compliance with all other rules, regulations, ordinances and procedures regulating
and affecting the operation of cable television companies as same may have been,
or may from time to time be issued by the City of Chula Vista.
26. Agree to submit a detail landscape and irrigation plan for open space lots
A,B,C,D,E and common open space areas inclusive of front and exterior side
yard areas to the City Landscape Architect for review and approval prior to
issuance of grading permits. The plans shall provide tree/shrub species size
information, and hardscape materials specifications. The final
landscape/irrigation plans shall be in compliance with Section 6.4 (General
Landscape Concept) of the Eastlake Greens SPA.
27. Agree to improve the golf course view point west of the subject site in
conjunction with the development of the Project Site and install golf course trail
markers along N. Greensview Drive and Hunte Parkway in accordance with the
Eastlake Greens Trails Plan. Detailed development plans for the golf course view
point and trail marker design details shall be submitted to the Planning
Department and Parks and Recreation Department for review and approval prior
to issuance of building permits.
28. Agree to comply with all conditions of approval for DRC-95-29.
OPEN SPACE/ASSESSMENTS
29. Offer to grant in fee on the Final Map open space Lots "A", "B", "C", "D" and
"E". The minimum width of Lot "A" shall be 10 feet.
30. Submit a list of all facilities located on open space lots to be maintained by the
existing Eastlake Maintenance District No. 1. This list shall include a
-10-
J%-/f
description, quantity and unit price per year for the perpetual maintenance of all
facilities located on open space lots to include but not be limited to: walls,
fences, water fountains, lighting structures, paths, access roads, drainage
structures and landscaping. Only those items on an open space lot are eligible for
open space maintenance. Each open space lot shall also be broken down by the
number of acres of turf, irrigated, and non-irrigated open space to aid the
estimation of a maintenance budget thereof.
31. Pay additional fees on a fair-share basis into Assessment District Numbers 85-2,
90-3 and other applicable assessments districts due to a change in units approved
subsequent to District formation as determined by the City Engineer.
32. Pay additional Transportation DIF on a fair-share basis into the DIF fund due to
a change in units approved subsequent to formation of AD 90-3, which funds a
portion of the Transportation DIF, as determined by the City Engineer.
33. Pay all costs associated with apportionment of assessments for all City assessment
districts as a result of subdivision of lands within the boundary. Request
apportionment and provide a deposit to the City estimated at $40/unit/district to
cover costs.
34. Prepare a disclosure form to be signed by the home buyer acknowledging that
additional fees have been paid into the Assessment District or the Transportation
DIF Fund, and that these additional fees are reflected in the purchase price of the
home for those units which have a density change from that indicated in the
assessment district's Engineer's Report. Submit disclosure form for the approval
of the City Engineer.
EASEMENTS
35. Grant to the City a 10' wide easement for general utility purposes along street
frontage of all open space lots proposed for dedication to the City.
36. Grant to the City a 10' wide easement for construction and maintenance of public
sewer facilities within open space Lot E.
37. Grant to the City a minimum 12' wide easement over public sewer within Lot E
and the private drive at the westerly terminus of Corte Palomira.
38. Grant to the City a minimum 24' wide general utility and access easement within
Corte Palomira.
-11-
....--
//5'-./.>
39. Grant to Otay Municipal Water District a 10' wide easement for construction and
maintenance of water facilities within open space Lot E. Provide acceptance
certificate of said easement on final map.
40. Indicate on the final map a future private storm drain easement to the
Homeowners' Association over the storm drain facilities within Lot E.
MISCELLANEOUS
41. Submit, process and record a boundary adjustment along the easterly boundary
of the proposed project prior to final map approval or include the owner of the
adjacent property (EastLake Golf Course) as signator on the final map.
42. File with the City of Chula Vista a copy of the Declaration of Covenants,
Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R'S) applicable to the Project
Site. The CC&R's shall include, among others, provisions for the:
a. Formation of a homeowner's association (HOA).
b. HOA responsibilities to maintain all private streets and driveways,
commons areas inclusive of front and exterior side yard areas, private
sewers and drainage systems, except those assumed by the Eastlake II
Community Association.
c. Prohibition of the television antennas, garage conversions, parking outside
of the designated areas, parking of recreational vehicles and boat trailers.
d. Inclusion of the City of Chula Vista as a party to said Declaration
authorizing the City to enforce the terms and conditions of said
Declaration insofar as said enforcement applies to areas of public concern,
in accordance with CVMC section 18.44.010.
43. Tie the boundary of the subdivision to the California System -Zone VI (NAD
'83).
44. Submit copies of Final Maps in a digital format such as (DXF) graphic file prior
to approval of each Final Map. Provide computer aided Design (CAD) copy of
the Final Map based on accurate coordinate geometry calculations and submit the
information in accordance with the City Guidelines for Digital Submittal in
duplicate on 5-112 HD floppy disk prior to the approval of each Final Map.
-12-
J~'J~
X. CODE REQUIREMENTS
45. Comply with all applicable sections of the Chula Vista Municipal Code.
Preparation of the Final Map and all plans shall be in accordance with the
provisions of the Subdivision Map Act and the City of Chula Vista Subdivision
Ordinance and Subdivision Manual.
46. Underground all utilities within the subdivision in accordance with Municipal
Code requirements.
47. Pay the following fees in accordance with the City Code and Council Policy:
a. The Transportation and Public Facilities Development Impact Fees.
b. Signal Participation Fees.
c. All applicable sewer fees, including but not limited to sewer connection
fees.
d. Interim Pre-SR-125 impact fee (effective January 1, 1995).
e. Telegraph Canyon Sewer Pumped Flows DIF (or submit letter of credit
prior to final map approval).
Pay the amount of said fees in effect at the time of issuance of building permits.
48. Install required fire hydrants prior to delivery of any combustible construction
materials.
49. Install a knox-box or knox-key-switch at the gated entry, as required by the Fire
Marshal.
XI. CONSEQUENCE OF FAILURE OF CONDITIONS
If any of the foregoing conditions fail to occur, or if they are, by their terms, to be
implemented and maintained over time, if any of such conditions fail to be so
implemented and maintained according to their terms, the City shall have the right to
revoke or modify all approvals herein granted, deny or further condition issuance of all
future building permits, deny, revoke or further condition all certificates of occupancy
issued under the authority of approvals herein granted, institute and prosecute litigation
to compel their compliance with said conditions or seek damages for their violation. No
vested rights are gained by Developer or a successor in interest by the City's approval
of this Resolution.
-13-
) %-) 7
XII. NOTICE OF DETERMINATION
The City Council directs the Environmental Review Coordinator to post a Notice of
Determination and file the same with the County Clerk.
XIII. INVALIDITY; AUTOMATIC REVOCATION
It is the intention of the City Council that its adoption of this Resolution is dependent
upon the enforceability of each and every term, provision and condition herein stated;
and that in the event that anyone or more terms, provisions or conditions are determined
by a Court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, illegal or unenforceable, this
resolution shall be deemed to be automatically revoked and of no further force and effect
ab initio.
Robert A. Leiter
Director of Planning
Bruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
Presented by
(f:\home\planning\amyw\pcs95-05.ccr)
-14-
JY~JY //Z-(IJg
Gi--~bl y A
i'll' I 'H, ~"'I ;
1 tj !! ~ J Ii , ! i~1 ~ :: I, hi' "
'" ' i 'I' 'I' " i
Ii,! 'I' Ii i i '! ii,' ; I! ~ Ii! I
~ ~Ii . .., il' "I ~!~ ~ ~ f f .
'1"11. ill,'I'" ':jl, j i' !. Ii' .
; r I: ~ ~t ~~ Eri i . I~",~ !
! I' II !I'l. !Iii ii,', i! I i1nH 1
I ! libli!ll i I!I!' ml! ! !II i"llill!~!111
I' "'i',,"il' ',jli!. :.11' .lls """:1'111
"'II I I", WI' Ji"-l" I -&If r".
~ lim.,'" 'I:~!, 1!!I!iill"I!!i1j"!II,"j!I!iI:;iin
i l!!!j ',! "11"+" i I l!hll' Iii !ill!
j :iIlllliilhlm!hiiillii!iilmllillhihl!!
* .a R. .. .._ .. .' : ::- ~ : f'I, " &;11 ll~ ~
z
<(
--'
a..
~
z
wen
~Z
ow :$
mWClO~
>a:Nf&
w,,, . c!
c'"'Ou
w ~
~WZ~
CJ)~I-s
c<-~
z...JZ~
<(1-::)0 _
0..,,,, ~
<(v, u
~<
wW
>
~
r.;
z
w
~
,
I I:: 'I
i j Ii !i>: l;..
III ,PI
,I,'! 'i Ii" I
,!.I, ! 111'1'
Ii ~~ lll~ ;:. E ~ i
,I.. !!!r I;.J ;
, 1 I ~ "
I . fl."".,,; c I"
I I I e ~ \O!- 1 ~ ';
i!1 !!j!!li
~ I,! Ii I: I 'II
~ ! ~ ~ t. g , ! ; ! .. ~
~ i
\ ij
\ ~,
..............._ ~z
; i.',
ii i JU' I,. i
"~ <" I
c , . ;1
. '
ft "I
.1'4 i .
i1TJlt=1 u;= _
'I I " ,
I' t t ~ i
, I .~ ill ~
',r.- ,~! I II ;i
: II u.., E.
'l. '. ~ 1 I , !ill
: II U, "ill
I:~ L-~- ~I
I' '_
r--
~ ji : i - ~ -
'\iI ~ !
',I ~
,=~ ~w
..~r C~WCD
; a . c"a:N
'.'I~!' ~CJo
:-1 ~ ~WZ~
'I. ;::ill:ll:....
1M. fi~!!~lg~
I'. <
· w
I .
faT
If
tt
.
S
III
..
-
.&:I
-
~
M
W
I · ,...il
~ "t
I I'
II- II
';1 I lit. :ill
I I!ii Ii lIIi " r
i.h Ii sUI ::in
I
"
I'
t'l
.
*
Jg-r02.j
i
".' I'
ii i
Illl 'i
""1"
i5U A5
I I
ill'"'
1'1 j,:
I ini
-I'
','
I.!,
I!!I
Iii!
II!"
:~ !
I ;i:1
Hl
'!Ii
!ill
I !iii
I
nJ-: I
...
PRCNECT
LOCATION
GOLF COURSE
CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
LOCATOR ~, Eastllake Development Co. ~
C)
~, No. of Clubhous. Dr. betwHn ....uat: J::/IT;se develov.,.nt of 51 lingl. family
Greensvi_ Dr. & Easlak. Pkwy. detached ling
SCALf, FU NUM8fR, Exhibit A
NORTH 400' PCS-95-05
5
/?/' ;2;2.
z:
<I:
~ ClOs
C\I~
I- 0
Q.. W~
UJ ~C3
'-' .&. <i
z:<~
o ...I ~
c..:>1-~
UJ cnu
Q.. ......~
<I: ..... >-
'-' W5
en
Cl
z:
<I:
....J
II.~ ~ !'''f !; ~i!
,....~ f ;fC; e~ !H
Ii! c :'; ,~ i~8
eii: ii !~i !ri ir~
1111 IlllI.I!! Ij!
,I" ,'I"~ ",II..
B ! I!: ~ i 'i'
",Il II Ili Iii !ih
l:Or "r i'lf ell ~~n
",1'10. ",i!m
'I i rt .~~ t'1~ ~;i~
11'1 Ii h, 'iil'I"!
e~ i. . ,(5 ~.
~ IIlll I"!!HI! I!;
~ III!!! t wI ~ ! E r _~
~ illii ;IIi:!! i!.' I'm
o ll'lI Ii ~I' ". iI'
~ I'I!; ,I Jll!1i .11
- jl,I" ..
:l ~ e~~ ~.
o _
,. ',' I
If .. if ~ ~ ..
',II i,11 11,lIi I
.! '!ill
!, · Ii 11!1!1 i
:IP:l 1!lllh i
lid'!, L III '! "
ll'nlil P! i'lI!
!oj I, !II ! I i hi.! I
nil I! nil 'I i !Ii iii i
i I!, !! 'I; I ! II, Ii! !
o li! I: liP '1IiIIIH'!
~ 'I' I ~!:.I ~ r ":I
U'lll. "" ... ..
w " .
0. .. ..
"i
iI-I
I ',!i !
J .'-
Ui!a
i.1
','I. .
I g,. '" >
J ',11-',
~,HL: !
i; :
;!~ n
IHi;~'
~ ~ ii i:; ~
I :Iu;~!
: ".'"
~ I' Hi! :
. ; 1.0 ". ~
i . =
i " !1m. !
w .......
. . ,
. ,
.! <l
>
!
!
I,i
i..,
....
'If
I !p I~
g,ill'
lUll,!
u,,~uuu
OO~ ~ ~~
,::::;= I
~~H~~ -
:J
'Ii ; li!!!,U,I!'
II I ~I"I III tc
Ji ;III11Wmlliii!
: _! r ~I
J illi!!l,'i
I hlillhh
I
'I I I
I: II i 'I i
I'j-.il. I!, 'hi
. ~ IIII illll! . \ i II iilllllllll! III
~ I :1111111111: II'lllllllll!!!!!!!!
! · 11111111111 i i __........
'! i Ilk. ~H.tltHlt ~ !
... i ',,~ ~ 0
0; ~ toG .
,
. "
; ~ f
~ ~! ~
~~i~~H ~
~';~ni~~~
~ i =. . e s ~I s !
!in!, j,
:i i 'i ~! a! i !
I.ii II""
.
~
w
<
w
<
~
~
2
~
~
.
.
~
~
i
<
,
!
~
~
i
;
~
+
/%r;2J
~
.
r
i
~
"
!
i
~
.'f:lr~
:u~
'.Ie;:c..
u
1U):
L...ll.J:
o~~
!-C) - .
CleO:
--)~:
crj<1: '
..
~
-
~
M
W
-
...
~
<,
el
.1
Iii
~
f
I
~
.
; H ~;
.~ e~ 5~~
"; .~ .rl
I: p ri>
.. !~
Iii~
~
~
Ii
"
'.
j~
~i
!,
"'
~
j
I
I'nl
~
"
~
\
~
~
CALIFORNIA
PACIFIC
HOMES
""., ' ~,o. - -
t~ . .'iiJ
~~o
If . r"
\.J ..
."
"
ENTRY ENLARGEMENT
EASTLAKE 28
CITY OF CHULA VISTA. CALIFORNIA
'..
,'.'
"
SlIDlNG~ITII1OH\I{IIC~~Go\~
co::>
~
NOlI'
FOlOI!ENlAYWlDTIfSANDDIU(NSlONS
SEECI'iIlENGI',U"SPlANS
PR(PA,A(DDYI.INSMERANOAS<;OC'.'fS
",
.J
'IlfJ~f_~A-.!~~!..!.'!I-RYWAll
CONCll(lfr~rOl1(;AIE
""'('".....:...'000"...'"'
~~_~lOC"~
WIlOlJGI-{T"","P(l)(STRlolNGATE
I
CD
. ,
L
I
I
:1
,
I
}
SOlI08lOCltCQUUUNIITY1HEMf...,.I.l,TYFj
rFREASI1AkES'ANO..nos
~
I
,
!
EffUIV'f1(Et'YI',
[III I = :~::.:;_
~,._'""-
----;;;.fr.lllAl COIORCtJ'.::Af'IE Wllllfll:;lO
w..~tF_"",,"OI"'-.()N....r"'I1ERH
n.n......J
. "
n.
'."'.. ~
~~~
8'''.''
BU~TO~
ASSOCIATES
'" '" "'" ....
...-.......
IN1l;~OOlORCONCRElE
W!fNACIOW"llHFHSll
ANODlolOOtW.p,I,ne_
WOOOn:NCE TYP
WOOOo..UltvP)
~
"-
~
,
~
~
~
CAuFORNIA
PAcIFIC
HOMES
TYPICAL COMMON DRIVEWAY
EASTLAKE 28
CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
~
r~
o
~
~
>'
y
" x
~
StAEEtlREEITYPI
fUHTlNO MEA (lYI' I
J
J
rv"".....l
'1<' ..
,..
""'
8"'
1'_~
...,
Cl
z:
~
:CC:!;
~N~
o
-JW~
L&.J~t3
-10&..
-I <C~
c:C ..J:>
c::: L....:5
c:C r- =>
~U)G
u.
-I <C~
c:C we
t.:l ()
~
>-
~
, \-
e::
i
u~
'r'
id
.11
Igl
~.~
JII
Hn
J6'" ) y- -2:b
ii-
~f
t,
.i~
!h
.1.
~e'
....,.,
-w.-
lti~~
~;
II
I~
.~
.Ii
-rw
iBe
Jnl
LLI~ JOj
~Z~
~LLln
\Il 0::: <
~(!)
~
. ~ \
/ .: /..~~\
h~\. /.~O"C ~'Q\\
/.~..,~Oy \\
/./ "';:.~ ,<~~,. ~,
({be,. ~" ,~~~~~lti~ \~
/I..,(J '15" ~o ''O~~ .y.-<~l~ ,,/-l( .' ~ ~"',' "
7';~ '~~' _ <>~ ~~~~" 1""'~' ~~....!\.' \.\
flit! 7'. 0 ",' \ J ~0.. 0'~" '" ,~:. ,,~~'\ \.\
.." ,,, I' ~ ':_ ,'_ ~ I'" '> Y"t\ '
'if!~ iL, ~~ ..t~~-~~r~=.~Io"':?E:'78Z ,.~>~<}~'~-~~))~~~~/~'7~\ '~
,:i1. ~ (..~~'" \ I /' - ' / - ?\ ',1, '," L-J~_~_j"'> ~~r- & \
l,' ~ " - / - ;/'~ -,' - '-, c'\ - ~
\ "'" '; ',~ ,""6' _~, ___/ , ~,y ~d#'~:" '-," - \ 'I' ~ \
"Q ," .I,~..' ,,,",C-'" I '" :ID~ j~~ ,-, ~ - err a
1\le -. ',': l:~<~<-~---?:t.:~-~/ / i !~ V - (',' ,,_=~~~jj).r' I~, \
..\ ~' ,';' . c: c:;." ',^' ' I ~')/) /"'-::., c'- '~"h I \
I . ,I." ~-~ c-," . , y /- = ~, '
II __ ,," .oJ"., ''L Q -- " "\-' II 7 ,. .~f~;'
o ')0:' ,_'" ~_.'",1 ',- .'~.' -T- ~~ \)~"
\\\\: ,~\, .~\ ( (-<0~~~~':' ~ \.: "1(\ ( '-;, ~ 2--'-$" -,-' I
\ \ '\:;: ~.;. :",' ' 1-" .:.,' -' ,~~~'~jl "- u'il' ' --; \-' . ~ fi2l' \
-....K" '> \, (:tft\.. ;..... \\ \ \ -, II ~ R: rl \ I -,' \ ~ ') -
_ " 'l ~". > '~ \,-, J '-'~I 'u_ \[ 'I \- ) , ,~ )I
___ ,1 'l:) ~ .. \ ....\ \\ 'l /;/ (f).!, 1-' \ \ --' ~ ,,/( ~ .
Ii ~"" 'JiO." - J' II'," \\',..:0 1-/ -~-.:, r~ '1 \ ' c1 - !', ~/ \
. \ ... \ )\ N I..... /1,/1 / .....!I'I ' ~ \I~ \ / -'
'," ~I\, II)" \ - , _. / f) l' ^/"~ (
\,?\' _~~'o'~~ \~ ~7)'O,.r-\~CI ~ - ~-;f~(p;'-, <~/~\Q~~'~V '
\~ 'f\/ '" ~\, - '~'II.- \I -~
~~ r- -) ~~: '^( ~. J6~' \ [' \ .." ~~ /
7l ,;;;;.~:;.i;." ~_;iii'iisriOiiiiii'~~- (,,/
/" ~ .it),.; I' 0 / ~" 7
U,. -''- ' ,~,p ~i'" / h
t{- .o. ,.. IW'..... IJ
.! .' :wolr-~wif .;'.&.- .
. \ ' ,0000 :o~,~.~ L
" ',.. I", _dl~O: ) ~'3t~Eo:-
\ =~:.. 1" " ~i ",,'........ 't:1c:rii1-,
-,-=~, 1, ' - ~-=~ ,t---ul",
\ ~ '" ~ 1I.~ ;'.
;/ ::::: _,' "" I
.____ -_/__=---'-~"'""-'~-...,...! III
-..;-' ~ .~~ .,~- - ,L
-- ~'-
i
ffi
l!:
~
I
f
,
S
~
I
I
.!!J.
'~
J=
!
I, -
t ~ '1- I I
~ . 0:1
J U II i I
j
I 8 = ~ I: '.b:;( ~
-Olio ~-..
-
-------. .
~ /~~;;. 7 /~-~t)
j
~
.
~
i
i
!
,
J
.
I
I
.
I
j
I
.
I
I
I
.
OJ
EJ
Q
..
-
.D
-
I:-
M
III
!
..)1:} ) r ~ ol S--
RESOLUTION NO. PCS-9S-05
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING
COMMISSION RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL
APPROVE THE TENTATIVE SUBDMSION MAP FOR EASTLAKE
GREENS UNIT 28, CHULA VISTA TRACT 9S-OS
WHEREAS, a duly verified application for a tentative subdivision map was f1.led with
the Planning Department of the City of Chula Vista on March 31, 1995 by Eastlake
Development Company ("Owner") and California Pacific Homes ("Developer"), and
WHEREAS, the Owner and Developer requested in said application approval to subdivide
Unit 28 of Eastlake Greens Tentative Subdivision Map, Chula Vista Tract 88-3, located on the
north side of Clubhouse Drive between Greensview Drive and Hunte Parkway, into 9 lots
containing a total of 51 dwelling units ("Project"); and
WHEREAS, an Initial Study, IS-94-19, of possible adverse environmental impacts of the
project was previously conducted in conjunction with the amendment to the EastLake II
(EastLake I expansion) General Development Plan, EastLake Greens SPA Plan, EastLake II
(EastLake I Expansion) Planned Community District Regulations, EastLake Greens Air Quality
Improvement Plan, EastLake Greens Water Conservation Plan and EastLake Greens Master
Tentative Subdivision Map (Chula Vista Tract 88-3) and Mitigated Negative Declaration and
Mitigation Monitoring Program on IS-94-19 was adopted by the City Council on August 16,
1994; and
WHEREAS, the Environmental Review Coordinator (ERC) has concluded that the
proposed project implements and falls under the purview of Mitigated Negative Declaration
IS-94-19 and that no new affects could occur and no new mitigation measures are required for
PCS-95-05 and recommends readoption of Mitigated Negative Declaration on IS-94-19 and
Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Director set the time and place for a hearing on said tentative
subdivision map application and notice of said hearing, together with its purpose, was given by
its publication in a newspaper of general circulation in the city and its mailing to property
owners and residents within 1,000 feet of the exterior boundaries of the property at least ten (10)
days prior to the hearing; and
WHEREAS, the hearing was held at the time and place as advertised, namely 7:00 p.m.,
May 24, 1995, in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building, 276 Fourth Avenue, before
the Planning Commission and said hearing was thereafter closed; and,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION
hereby readopts Mitigated Negative Declaration IS-94-19 and Mitigation Monitoring Program.
1;-31l/?~ J;J
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED THAT THE PLANNING COMMISSION recommends
that the City Council adopt the attached draft City Council Resolution approving the project in
accordance with the fmdings and subject to the conditions contained therein.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that a copy of this resolution be transmitted to the City
Council.
PASSED AND APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF CHULA VISTA,
CALIFORNIA, this 24th day of May, 1995 by the following vote, to-wit:
AYES: Commissioners Tuchscher, Fuller, Ray, Salas, Willett
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTENTIONS: None
~~
William C. Tuchscher II, Chairman
ATTEST:
~ 7:2\
tAJ.
ancy i:pley, ?ecre:J.ry
(f:_Ip......Iamyw\pcl9S'OS.....l
~ JY~J,/
Excerpt from Planninl! Commission Minutes of 5/24/95
ITEM 1.
PUBLIC HEARING: PCS-95-05: TENTATIVE SUBDIVISION MAP FOR
PARCELR-28,CHULA VISTA TRACT95-05,INVOLVINGDEVELOPMENT
OF 51 DETACHED CONDOMINIUM DWELLINGS AND LOCATED
WITHIN THE EASTLAKE GREENS PLANNED COMMUNITY - EastLake
Development Company
Assistant Planner Wolfe presented the staff report. Staff recommended approval of the tentative
subdivision map, in accordance with the conditions contained in the draft City Council
resolution.
This being the time and place as advertised, the public hearing was opened.
Mike Dunham, California Pacific Homes, 9191 Town Center Drive, Suite L-I0l, San Diego,
Vice President and Director of Operations, gave a slide presentation of a project they had done
in Orange County, and an overview of their company. He noted that in attendance were
representatives from their civil and planning engineering company, and the director of in-house
engineering to answer any questions the Commission may have.
Commissioner Willett, regarding the mitigation monitoring reporting program, asked if there was
a mechanism to ensure that the reporting program was implemented, and to whom it reported.
Assistant Planning Director Lee replied that the Initial Study referred to in the document was
part of the SPA amendment rezoning package that had taken place some time before. The
mitigation monitoring was relating to a noise analysis which was not applicable to this use. It
was basically monitored by staff.
Commissioner Willett was concerned about drainage into the Poggi Canyon and the future
Orange Avenue. Mr. Lee stated he believed there were more detention basins planned that
would offer better drainage control.
Sr. Civil Engineer Thomas stated they were working with the developers of several projects to
have several significant detention basins in Poggi Canyon to reduce that effect to approximately
50% of what it would ultimately be. This particular project was a small component of the
watershed.
Commissioner Ray asked the rationale for supporting private streets in this subdivision. Mr. Lee
explained that the overall loop road system within the Greens (Greensview Drive) was the main
vehicular and pedestrian system tied to the overall EastLake trail system. In this case, staff did
not feel that the subject site was instrumental to the general circulation in the area, thus the
streets could be either private or public.
Commissioner Ray questioned the maintenance and the frequency of maintenance. Mr. Lee
replied that maintenance was covered more extensively by CC&Rs and the Department of Real
~
) g-~ J /
Estate reports requiring a maintenance budget. He noted that the street section would be built
to City standards.
Commissioner Ray asked if the applicants were precluded from gating the subdivision. Mr. Lee
answered negatively, and stated there would be a gate at the entry point.
There was further discussion regarding gating projects. Mr. Lee explained that project gating
was on a case-by-case basis. There was no definite City standard regarding gating. It was
determined on the size of the project, the circulation pattern, isolation of the project, and other
issues.
No one else wishing to speak, the public hearing was closed.
MSUC (Fuller/Willett) 6-0 to adopt Planning Commission Resolution PCS-95-05
recommending that the City Council approve the Tentative Subdivision Map for Unit 28.
Chula Vista Tract 95-05. in accordance with the findings and subject to the conditions
contained therein.
.
ff JJY~J.2
RCC MINUTES
g /Y~J3'
MINUTES OF A SCHEDULED REGULAR. MEE'IlNG
Resource Conservation COmmission
Chula Visla, California
6:30 p.m.
Monday, Apri111, 1994
CowlCil Ccafczence Room
City Ball Building
CALL MEETING TO ORDER/ROLL CALL: Meeting was caIled ID order at 6:40 p.m. by
Cbainnan Kracha. City Staf'f Environmental Review Coordinalor Doug Jte.id caIled roll.
I'Jesent: Commissioners Hall, Kracha, Ghougassian, JohnlOn, IIId Burrucano. It was MSUC
(JohnlOnlHall) to ucuse Commissioner Myers from last meetilllllld 1110 through the summer
until she finishes IChool; motion carried S.().. It was NSUC (HallIBunucano) to excuse
Guemiro from the meeting of March 7 and April II due to his IChooI aams; motion carried
S.(). It was MSUC (HalllBuna.scano) to excuse Johnson from the meeting of March 21 due to
vacation; motion carried S-O. JCracha Slated he will be on vacation May 2-June 10, 1994.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES: It was MSUC (lohnlOnlHaIl) ID approve die minutes of the
meeting of March 7, 1994. The minutes of March 21 could not be approved due to no quorum
present from that meeting. It was noted that the minutes of February 7, 1994 are ltill
unapproved. .
NEW BUSINESS:
1. Used Motor Oil Grant Application - Michael Macbam explained the pant requirements
and how he is seeking to have IOme of the money eharged from the oillD be returned to
the City. The $240,000 regional arant application is being done on beha1f of Imperial
Beach, National City and Chula Visa. He will 1110 uk uslstance from IChools and
businesses to educate the public on programs to recycle oil. The Nature Center currently
lias these classes and will work with them on preserving the environment.
It was MSUC (HalIIGhougusian) to recommend that Council approve the pant; motion
carried S.().
2. Review of Negative Veclaration 15#10, Bonill RaId Bicycle LIDe: 1& II DOl&ld lIlId Ibe
lanes were included in the General Plan. Opposition to the aeptive decluadOll included
comments 011 the cost, IXC'CIS traffIC, and ttaal underpound utilicia would DIed ID be
nll)Clted .
A motion was made by Ghou.,,,lan ID reject the project u II lllaOI 8ClOIIOIIIic:a11D the
City; motion died due ID Jack of IICOIld. .
A motion was made by Hall, IICOIlded by Bunucano ID ICCept the IIIp!ive declantion;
motion carried 4-1, no: Ohouaassian.
Another motion was made by Hall, IICOIlded by Ohouaassian dial the pIOjeel be denied
due to safety problems with traffic. Bunucano felt dial the bicycle Jane was the best
~ /JY:Jj;,
Resource Conservation Commission
Page 2
alternative for bikes. However, Hall and Ohoulwian felt the dan&er aisted for bikes to
be ridin, in the busy intersection too dose to the freeway; motioft failed 3-2, DO:
Bumucano, JCracha.
A motion was made by Ghou,wian, IeCOnded by Ra11 to deny die project clue to
IIM~S$Jl')' upense; motion failed 3-2, DO: Burrucano, ICncha.
3. Review of Ne,ative Declaration IS-94-14, European Pans Club, po Tv-ted by Mr.
Martinez. Afler brief discussion, it was MSUC (GhoulassianIBunucano) to accept the
DClative declaration; motion carried 5~.
4. Review of Nc,ativc Declaration IS-94-19, Modification to the EastLake Greens GDP/SPA.
Information was relayed on thc dcnsity transfcr within thc approved areas of EasILakc
Greens, and exchan,c of propcny between Olay Ranch and EastLake.
It was MSUC (Burrascano/Hill) to accept the nelative declaration; motion carried S~.
.
(Ghou,a.ssian left the meetin. at 7:50 p.m.]
5. Environmental Health Coalition: ICncha was distressed dlat this item was lent to Councu
beforc RCC laW thc draft. Hc questioned how Ionl in advance this was cIoc:keted to
council. further, he wondered if there would be other IUJPrUes to tapect from the
relationship between the Environmental Health Coalition and the Environmental Raource
Manager. JCracha commented on how pans of the packet apparelS to be aenaated by the
City, however, it is on record dlat the information is Ilrady in effect in San Die&o
County. The packet further pena.ins only to City pro&ramI and operatioras, and be thou&ht
it should be I countywide pro&r&m. Since too many questions were Iefl UIIIItJWUed, this
wi1l be an aaenda item aaain at the next meetin..
6. Historical Si,ns: JCracha aaain upreued his cIisatisfaction Ibat die City Council
appropriated fundill' (If $3700 to the Cultural Ans Commission in aupport of i&s actl.vities
for the remainder of the rascal year. Consequently, be was offended Ibat in order to cut
i&s bud&et, the CouncU had removed the item of historical alps from RCC', budlet with
the intention Ibat the City Manqer would find altemative fundin& for Ibc alps. 1IowcYer,
this bas DOt been clone to date, Jet the Council IppIOpriated CICber fuDda lor another
Commission.
A motion made by Hall and lICOAded by Bunuc:ano to ...Ibc .m, and UIlspall lDOIIiea
in RCC's cunent budlct and clcsi,nate it to . fwId to ply for alps lot Ibc biJtorical
buildin&sj vote: 2-2, no: Johnaon, ICncha. The no VOle was expreued becanif' it cIoea DOt
IOlve thc City's problem nor the City Manqer'. oblilltion of findinJ altemative fundina.
JCracha stated dlat the problem of the si,ns bas been unresolved for over five JCIlI and
nsidcnts are Jtill waltinl for the silns.
~ /y-y?
Resource Conservation Commission
Pa&e 3
It was luUested that a recommendation be made to the City Manaaer that it oonsider a
budaet Il"Insfer and requirement !undina of the lians. Additionally, u no other lOurc:e of
alternative funds have been found, that this be reinstated u a line item into RCC'. budaet.
The RCC also leeks a commitment from the Council to purchase Ihe ba1anc:e of Ihc li&ns
for desianated historical buildinas.
7. Environmentalist of the 1eaJ' award: no criteria for nomination was included blllle aaenda
packet. The Commission was informed that a pzesentation ClOIIld be made at the
Beautification Award banquet on May 31, 1994. Since no nominations were made by this
date, nothina will be done for this year. It was SIIUested that criteria be developed for
nominations and thaI plannina beain in a timely manner next 1eaJ'.
STAFF REPORT:
Doug Reid handed out information for the ltaff contact person 01\ the issue papers.
CHAIRMAN'S COMMENrS:
Kracha communicated his disappointment in the way RCC is aoina.
COMMISSIONER'S COMMENt'S:
Burrascano reported she heard back from Staff on the Landscape Nanllll and Brush
Management. Doua Reid said that staff members are wilIina to answer questions before
the Commission if requested.
ADI0tJRNMENT: The meelina was adjourned by Chairman Kracha II 8:30 p.m.
Respectfully .ubmitted.
EXPRESS SECRETAlUAL SERVICES
.
~~
Bazbara Taylor
.
-
2D J'prJr
niti-gated Negal.ve Declaratio
r- ,..,,~ r
.
PROJECT NAME: Modification to 1be EutLake Oncns ODPJSPA IIId 1be formation
of an Assessment District for YIrious publie Inlplo..ements
PROJECT LOCATION: South of Ota)' Lakes ROId Ilet..KlI EuILakc r.kw'l)' IIId Hunte
Parkway
PROJECT APPLICANT: Eutlake Development Company
CASE NO: IS.94-19
DATE: February 28, 1994
A. project Settin2
The pro)cet lite loc:ated south of Otay Lakes Road betwDtn EastLlke Padcway IIId Hunte
Park\\'a)' and this leneral vieinity (Eastlake and Otay Raneh) do not involve lilY IUbalntial
soil or any ICOtcehnical hazards that would impact 1be proposecl projeet.
.
The project is loc:ated within 1be San DielO air basin which is III air quality IIOIHIUaInmcnt
basin, The project includes. 97 dwellinl unit increase ~"'- of 1bc apIIlSlon In land
area of the Greens SPA, This will not I'Cluh in . IUbstantial increase In lllliuion Into 1be
air basin or any substantial dcJrldation in air quality.
...
However, because the increase in 1be projcctcd units is more than 50. oomp1iance with 1be
City ~uircment for an Air Quality Improvement Plan must be met. 'I1ws, this .....than.
.ignificanl impact will be further reduced.
.
The project lite involves the Telepph Canyon Creek, Poul Canyon Cnelt IIId Sah Creek
drain.ge basins, FutlII'C I'Clional facilities in 1besc buinl may 11II4 MditioDIJ lIIIDulative
capacities to acrve 1be 22.7 additional acrel beinl addocI to 1bc SPA IloundII)' IlUt 1be
impacts of this project would not be lianifi~l 'iliac draInap ClllUneI do DOt ... any
potable water sources nor 1ft they . lianif'JC&nt IOIIrCC of Ill)' pound water. .
This propcrt)' lias been lIIICI for qricu1turaJ purJllllCl (or IIlIII)' , I -........ II wold or Ill)'
aiJllificant ..._on or lllimallife. 1bc projecl ClClUld d'1Cl apIOr ...--- IIut pen 1bc
limited .,.,e this II DOl alplf'1CIJIt,
1bcrc _ mOllS ... III tbc projec:I _ wbIch IIIve tIdic *- - ... eI)' .-uJt D
Idvmc DOlle 1eYcIs. 0n0e.-1Ie pili ... ~ to ... ....... In bnD,
IpeClfic mhiptiOll will be It .dfiId.. 1IIIp1en_ l~ 1IIia ...... llal.... wID DOl
IIIUlt III Ill)' lipdficlnt _M or IiIJrt . pre. .
11le project u p1vpc.1Id II GllIII'" willi die cllher 1Dw.eedfunl .....w.. .u-nt to..
In 1be vicinity or tbc projecl lite IIId 1be pop.IMI'Xl 11Mb In --'--' wIIb tbc JIIO.lect
...
Public tacllitia IIId .,-1m IDcludIDa ._~1l0ll In .,.n-"Ie .. -.. 1- to ~,~
1beproject.IIId~. . ~
..., .. IIbuIa Nta ........... ...,.,....t CItY OF___
....1tOMt.ntal ..... ......... 0fLIA YI5TA
1'0-.35 !/g--y/
< <
The underlying .eologiul Ilrata on lIIe project aile possess I lIiaJI polIlntiaJ for aianifiunt
paJeontoJogiuJ "'SOIll'CCS. Those areas whieh have been paded have boen IIIClIlItored IIld
lilY aianifiunt resolll'CCS ncovered. This moni1orin. will ClOIItinue i11l11e currauJy DOn-
padedareas. .
Mitigation of lilY potential culunl IUOIII'CCS on die project lite was previously
Implemented. I
B. project Desc:rit)tion
Oenel"l.l Deserimion
The project Is III amendment mille adopted EutJake I 0IDenJ Dmolvi>l'lC4t '!Ill (OOP),
whieh ineludes Ea.s1LIke Orwns; III amendment mthe adopted EutIake Orwns SPA '1In
(SPA) IIld Tentative Tract Map; IIld the annexation ofapproxlmatel)' 23...110 the City
of Chula Vista, The amendments mille OOP IIld Tentative Tract Map .... Ialended m
...neet those changes proposed in lIIe SPA '1In. The changes iIIlhe SPA '!Ill .... of the
following two ulegories:
I.
Amendingllle OOPISPA to inelude 1II0se JlII"CCls of the recent Land Swap General
Plan Amendment east of the' SDOIlE nnsmission easement (CllplIIIIlon of Pcecls
Jl,- I 0, Jl,-20, IIld Jl,-23 for 97 additional units).
.
2.
Transfers of units within lIIe existing SPA boundl:y to reflect hdiI.cmaus with DO
lIet ineruse of density.
3.
The formation of an Assessment Oistriet to (94- I EutIake D) tor Ibe iDatIllation
of public faeilities to serve the projec:t
Ineluded is Table 1, Ihe Adopted Sile UtiIizItion '!Ill. Table 2 wIIic:h IUIIIIIlII'izes Ihe
proposed midential changes.
Deseription or ~d Swat) Area Amendment
Only Ihose II'tIS east of the tnnsmiuion euemcnt _ IncJuded ill ibis 1IIIIIIlIment. The
llalanee of die Land Swap Ana (bItw1lll Ibe 0Ia)' RaDch ., s:...,..Ir'l), wIIic:h was
nccntly Ibe IUbject of . 0Incra1 '!Ill AIIIendment, wI1I .. _._..cS '>' . IIflII*
IIIICIIdment. 1'he purpoIe oflDcludiDa ....ID ibis "'-rtll~ -.....,.. J I *1)' II
_lilt the)' .... IoaIcallIlpIJlIlClIII of aIatIDa partlIJI wIlbID . .-......... 0... SPA
,!Ill. 'I1Ie JlII"CCb that.... ~. ~~ t.)'.1IOIIIt OPA Wldt "1'11111..10. 1.-20 -..I Jl,.
23. Upon favorable 1Cdc.:a. .... ... .... ...., - to .. ..... ..., to . CIt.r 01 Quia
Vista. FollowiDa II I 'If ,IPCIOD of.. of.... partlIJI:
M.ID: 1'he.-1ipDlnl 01 Qnnp AWDIII to .. IOlIIIl .... ..~
ibis pII'OIl'alloundl:y. TbeIe... .--rt.l:I........ 'F- II Low.
Medium DInsIt)' em the 0Incra1 P!IIl. 1'he ~Inl of. dInaky
nnp (4.5 dtalae) II ..in. .. -+ DIed. 1'he tDCII IDcflue tbr ibis
pewl is 79 du (67 du ill the Land Swap Ana ad 12 du ID ...
j.....iouIl)' 1Dlf~ u Onnp AWllUllFUIUrI Urban).
WPe.~7J'"
2tf" /.? - -Y.;<
....2
~LE1
...u.k. GrHna .ite vt1l1aatlon .1an
~ ..d4_t.1al IAD4 .. 8t:at.l8Uaa
.arcel Dend 1:y Ac:z'.. ~ar9.1: ~arvet
Ifumb@r .ana. Ba",.i1=v IJl\t~.
1.-1 0-5 11.' 2.' .4
R-2 0-5 14.' 2.7 ..0
R-:,3 0-5 21.1 3.1 .3
R-4 0-5 24.0 4.3 104
R-5 0-5 23.0 4.1 105
R-6 0-5 17.4 '.0 18
R-7 '-15 10.7 , 6.0 '5
R-8 5-15 16.4 . '.1 '6
R-I) 5-15 '.5 '.3 45
R-10 "-15 27.1 6.0 ) 167"
R-11 '-15 14.1 '.3 .2
R-12 5-15 14.3 6.5 .3
R-13 5-15 22.' 6.3 142
R-14 '-15 11.4 7.4 .4
R-15 5-15 11.' '7.1 II
R-16 '-15 10.5 7.1 .3
R-17 '-15 2.. '7 7.2 214
R-18 5-15 ... 1.1 17
R-19 '-15 14.1 10.6 111
R-20 1-15 13.1 12.0 164
R-21 '-15 10.0 12.0 120
R-22 '-15 10.1 13.1 14'
R-23 '-15 13.' 15.0 205
R-24 15-25 ..0 10.0 '0
R-25 15-25 7.4 10.0 '4
.-2'. 11-25 13.3 ".1 aD
.-27. 25+ ... ".1 ..0
.-21* 25+ ..!. ..B 27
I'O':AL ..12.4 ac 1774 du
.%Auria DUlpaUon
0-
~ IS"'-~;I
.,
~LZ2
.uu.Jt. ClZ'eens ala vtll1aa1:1on .1an
~opc..ec! "'1.cImlUall.a11l! 1JH ftaU.u_
.aroe1 Dendty Acr.. t'&rg.t t'arg.t Znclr.... (+)
.\11P1~.r _.''ifl. ~",.i't.v ""t'to. "'era...l-'
a-l 0-5 11.'7 2.'7 14 0
a-2 0-5 14.'7 2.'7 .0 0
a-3 0-5 21.1 4.'7 102 +11
a-4 0-5 24.0 4.3 104 0
a-5 0-5 23.0 4.6 105 0
a-6 5-15 17.4 1.1 II 0
a-7 1-15 10.'7 1.6 .0 -5
a-I 1-15 16.4 i.. 16 0
a-.. 1-15 1.5 1.3 U 0
a-l0 1-15 45.4 1.4 241 - +'71
a-11 1-15 14.6 '.0 17 -5
a-12 1-15 14.3 '.5 t3 0
a-13 1-15 22.6 '.3 142 0
a-14 1-15 11.4 '7.4 16 +2
a-15 5-15 11.6 '.5 65 -23
a-16 5-15 10.5 '7.' 13 0
a-17 1-15 'U.'7 '7.2 214 0
a-II 5-15 ... 1.1 n 0
a-1I 1-15 14.' 10.6 UI 0
a-20 1-15 15.7 ..2 153 +11
a-21 1-15 10.0 12.0 120 0
a-22 1-15 10.1 13.1 141 -I
a-23 1-15 15.1 13.5 214 +.
a-24 1-15 1.0 10.0 .6 -4
a-25 1-15 '.4 10.0 'I +4
a-26- 1-15 13.1 4.. '0' 0
a-27 0-1 I.' ... 44 +4
.-2. .-~! &..!. ..... ao +55
S'OU1o "4.1 eo ... .In du ."
-lnuria Dedgna1:1onl .aroal -=,.ct to flltu. D&......t
to M oonalatant with ~. Oanaral .1an.
.'
1-11-14
,2C );-1/1/
"
R.20: This. pareel is cxpuldcd b)' a 2.1 8C:ft 1riIn&Ie adjacent to the
SDO&E easement. The new .... Is oompuled at the mid-polnt of
the Low.Mediwn density ranae (4.5 dWK). A ncIuc:tion Is ",vposed
for the pareel u a whole to rcf1ect current pJanniDa.'mlrbti.
R.13: This pIl'Cel is identic:al to the cIlanaes for R.20. acept that
DO decrease in the density is proposed. A IICI iDcrlue of' units are
proposed for this 2.1 acre Iddition to the SPA.
A total increase of 22.7 acres and '7 du are included in these.'" JIII'llCls.
peseription of pensitv Transfers
This Imendment includes density 1rInSfm within the aiJtIn& SPA Iloundary to reflect
current pllMlnglmarketing. These changes do DOt tm:r.se the D\llllber ofunits (2774 du)
previousl)' adopted. Following is a I\DIlJJW)' of the density 1rInSfers. Refer also to Table
2 for. composite of both density 1rInSfm and Idditions resulting tom the Idditional Land
Swap Areas.
,Parcel Number
R-3
R.'
R.II
R.14
R-IS
R.20
R.22
R.24
R.2S
R-27
R.28
TOTAL
J21J Inereast PU Decrase
.19 .
-5
-5
.2
-23
-20
-5
-4
...
...
:W -
-+(j2 ~2
Description of AssesMnent t)iltric:t Work
The pncral des .I.,tilln ofwodt to be funded II)' All IlMOt DiIIrict ,... ~ 1- oftbe
following:
.. I1reet """v~....'.a.u -1Ilina of FIIfinI. .... pntaa. ...... -'.._-~. -.et
lilbtizla and Jand,~1zIa wIIbiD the foJlowiDa rfIJDof-wl)': .
L IoudI o.~ilwDrive lam ell..... '* Drive to UIIIt ,........4. c;z.4OO
LF.. Phue .).
b. South 0reenIYiew Drive hm SiIvIndo Drive to Hunte r..".way (3.400.
LF.. 'bue 2).
c. South ar.nm.w Drive tram UDit , .....aa to SIt._tJo Drive (1,P20
LF.. Phue 3).
wpc.~I"''''
N )If--YS
flieS
'.
2. Utilities Illd Ill'lderlJ'OlII'Id Improvements consistina of potable WIler facllilies. Ilorm
drain facilities. leWer facilities. _laimed water flcilities. elecuic flcilities.
tIelephone facilities. ps facilities. tllevlslon flcl1ities u .....,.,p.iat.c by epplicable
Itate Illd federal ItIMes within the foJlowina rilhts-of.WlY:
L South Greensview Drive 60m ClubboUIC Drive to UnIt , IIIlrInCC <2,400
L.F.. Phue J).
b. South GrwnsView Drive &om Sllvendo Drive to H\IIItC Parkway (3,400
L.F.. Phue 2).
c. South Greensview Drive 60m UnIt , IIdI'Ince to SlIvendo DrIve (1,920
L.F.. Phue 3).
3. DIF funded ItrCCt Improvements IlOI\Slstina of pdina. Itorm drain, Ilue, JlIvina.
curb. JUUCr, Ildewalk, medillls. IlreCt liahtina, lIndscapina 8ftd ItrCCt
monumentation within the foJlowina riahts-of.way;
a, Hunte Parkway from Clubhouse Drive to South Greensview Drive <2,300
L.F.. Phue 2).
4. DIF funded IlI'eet Illd III'Iderarolll'ld improvements llOI\Sistinl of pdina. and Ilorm
drain improvements within the followina riahts-of.WlY:
a. Hunte Parkway from South Greensview to Oranae Avenue (1.270 L.F.,
Phue 2).
b. Orange Avenue from Hlll'lte Parkway to the SDOAE euement (3,500 L.F.,
Phue 2).
Diseretionarv Acdonl Associated (but not limited to' the ~ied Area
I. General Development Plan Amendment
2. Sectional Area Plan (SPA) Amendment
3. Modification to the Eutlake Orecns Site UtI1ization Plan
4. Eltabllshmcnt of District 94-J
5. Annexation
,. Tllltltive Subdivision Map
7. DcsIJII Rmew
C. r~lIitv wftIl 7mIiftR mid &m.
The project II _iItent willi. the ...n tl~ 'IID. ne projIct Iavolvel an
~t to the IIIOI'C IpKIf\c IIDd _ npladllU fill the ......".. ar-a GIaenI
Development Plan (ODP) and SlcdoaaI PIInnIna AM Plan (SPA).
D. Jlentlfication fir F.ftvircmmentsl Efrects
An mrtial I&Udy ~ by the City fill QuIa Villa (mdudiDa the -;d
Environmental CbeckJist FClnII) dItIrminId IbIl the propclIId projIct IOUId IIaw ClIIC or
. /~r.L/-i.
WI'C '~I7J''';;;Pif flit 4
more significant environmental etrccu. Subsoq\lCrlt revisions in Ihc project dcsilll Ind/or
specific mitigation measures will be Implemlllled to MIICC thac etrccu to . level below
aignificanL With project revisions Ind/or miliaation, DO lilniracant IllvironmCll1l1 effects
will occur, Cld the prqlaJ'Ition of Cl &viromnllltal Impact R.pon will DOt be Nquired.
This Mitigaled Neaative Declaration lias been JlI'CPII'ICI in II:COf'dancc with Scc:tion 15070
orthe State CEQA Guidelines. Specific mitiption -.urea Ire lit forth ill the Mitiption
Monitorina Proaram which Ia ....~bcd u Aaachment eA".
The followina Impacts II"e thOle that were determlned to be potentially liInlf"acant and II"e
required to be lIIiuaated to . level below .larUracanL A dittusslon of eIch of these
potentially alanificant but mitiptlble Impa'1s from the ...~ project folio.....
Aeounics
The Initial Study has lIoled that trlftic wlume OIIl'011fways ill and 8djlClllt to Ihe project
aite could Increase ambient noise to an IIIIICCCJltable level.
E. ~iti2ation neeeSSIT'\I to avoid licnificant eff'eeu
Specific project mitigation measures II"e Nquircd to Mute poeentiaJly a1gnificant
environmental impacts identified in the initial IlUdy for this project to . level below
aignificant.Mitiaation measures have been incorporated into the project design and have
been made conditions of project approval, u well u nqub...._.ts of the 8IW:hed
Mitiaation Monitorlna Propam (Auachment "Aft). .
At the time of consideration . of . Tentative Subdivision Map or DesiJn Review
Supplemental Acoustical reports will be prepared for projects 8djlClllt to Chula Vista
General Plan Circulation Element Roadways. At that lime the pncise elevation of
roadways and residential development peds will be IVIllable. With this inf'OJIIIItion, it will
be feasible to make an KCurate fOil t I~ of DOise levels and the ...... .....1ate lllltia1uon
measures acceSSll)' to Mute lIOise levels to an .~ ~ Il'tlble ~ lllderior dBA (CNEL).
These acoustical reports must be Ilued 011 the latest IlUiJdoul tnJrlC L mt and must
validate the achievement of the 65 exterior dBA (CNEL) 1IIndard.
F. Consultation
I. ~divi4p.ls ."d n...n1utj0ftS
City of CbuIs ViI1a:
Ropr DIouIt. EqIneairIa
cutr SWIIIICIft, ~
Hal RoalD... ~
Bob Ieanea, ,......""
XIII Lmal. Dio b" 8~ A Houaina
c.ol OeM, Fin MIrIbaJ
Crime J\......A..., McyJIftC Die.....".
MIlt)' ScbmIdt, PIIb .t RKrIItion DepL
Rich Rudolf, AIIIItant City A1tDI1IC')'
.'
WI't,~I'M"
/f ;S'/l/}
file S
Chula viSta City Sehool District: JC.aIc Shurson
SweetWater Union Hiah Sehool District: Tom Silva
Applicant's Alent: CiaJy Cinti
Cinti lAnd Pllnnin.
362S Midway Dr., 1292
San Die.o, CA '2110
2. Documents
Chula Vista Genera1 Plan (1919) IIId EIR (1919)
Chula Vista Mlllli~ipal Code
Leuer dated FebNl1)' 9, 1994 from BNCC Sloan, Sr. Project Man&ier,
EastLakeDevelopment Co. I'Clardina aewlle pneration in aewaae basins,
improvements and rmancinl
Leuer dated FebNl1)' 7, 1994, Dennis c. Bowlina, Director WI1er Rao\II'CCS
Division, Rick u.ineerinl Co., l'C.ardin. the adequacy ot;. drainaae I)'*mS
Leuer da~ FebNl1)' 18, 1994, Andy Schlaeni, Vice President Urban Systems
Associates, Inc. l'C.ardin, 1he Idequacy or 1he Transponation Circ:ulalion System
3. Initial Stud,,'
This environmental determination is based on the II&IChed JJIitiaI S1ucIy IS well as
any comments on 1he Initial Study IIId 1his Mitipted Ntptlve Dedaration, IIId
I'Cflects 1he independent jud,ement or 1he City or Chula Vista. F1II1ber laf'ormation
l'C,ardin, the environmental review orthe project Is available tram the 0IuIa Vista
Ptannin, Deparlment, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA'1910.
~I .
o AL REVIEW COORDINATOR
EN , (bY. "'3)
,"
WK ""ICI..r,,~I","
/2'~1/r
?eJ
file ,
Attachment A
MITIGATION MONITORING PJtOGMM
MITIaATION ~~
At the time of C:onlideration of a Tentative lubc5iv18ion Map or
Design Review Supplemental Acou.tical Report. will be prepared
for project. adjacent to O1ula Vi.t. General Plan C:irculation
Element Roadways. At that time. the preci.e elevation of
roadways and residential development pad8 will be available.
With this information, it will be fea.ible to make an accurate
forecast of noile level. and the appropriate mitigation
~eas~res necessary to reduce noi.e level. to an acceptable 6S
exterior dBA (CNEL) .tand.rd.
~~N!TOR!NG R~OU!REY.~~~
Prior to granting a tentative .ubdiviaion map or deaign review
approval, a noiae .tudy forecaatins Do1.e level. and the
appropriate measures nece..ary to r.duce noi.. level. to an
acceptable exterior 6S dBA CNEL i. required.
."
~ J ~--/fJ
.. tl:
~
., ~ ..,
Oil
"2
I
.
.
I P(),
I
IW
~
MEA OF DIlU't 1IANSPR
.
ADCIID JO .A ~~.J'(
CHULA
VISTA
PLANNING
DEPARTMENT
Ie!)
l ~RTB
A"~leANT: Ea.dakt DevelopmtDt Co.
'IlDJICT ...CIlIPTION:
'CA~I:
NO SCALE
"~I WUMIIIl:
IS.94.19
."
ADDIl''': too La. A....
C:UeNo.~
APPENDIX 1 .
ENVIRONMENTAL CREClCUST roRM
(To Be Comple&ed B)' Lead Apnc)')
..c:qround
I. Name of F'''r-.ent: ~lftlment Co.
2. AddIess and Pbane Number of v."r-1Cnl: ~ Ave.. ~.
Qm1a ViltL ~1913
3. Date of Ct-Itll..: ..fcbrull"V ~4
4. Name of Proposal: ~~ preens QDPlSPA Amendment
5. Ini%ial $lUcl)' Number:~19
I.
Exposure of people or property to ,eoJo.ic
baz.ards such as eanhquakes, landslides, mud
alides, around failure, or aimilar baz.ards?
.
[J
CI
Comments:
'!be project Is proposed for III urbanlzin& area of IUlem C1ula Vista. 'Ibere have lID findin&
of ailnlficant problems in die areas of leoloay aolls or eroalon. Generalized IIId more
IpeClfic aublWltiation of die leotec:hnIcaI and 1011 aukablllty of Ihe project aile II In die City
of C1ula Vista General Plan fEIR (1989), EastUke fEIR (1982), C.....l...lrf SPA I fEIR
(1985), Eastlake Greens SPA" c..., ...lre Trails Prezone" ANleulion REm (1989), and
Olay RlIlch FPEIR (1993), and oilier more apeclfic leololicalllld lOlls reporu on file wi1h
die City of C1ula VIsIl PIlblic Worts Depanment, EnaIneerlnJ Division.
2.
There will be IOrne modification of uistin. topOlraphy, however, dlisll ClOIISldered very
minor IIld not si.n1ficantliven the Jack of lilY allnlficant lOpoaraphlc fealures.
Air. Will the proposal result in:
m MAYBE tiQ
a.
Substantial air emissions or deterioration
of ambient air quality?
.
.
[J
[J
[J
o
b.
The creation of objectionable odors?
[J
c.
Alteration of air movement. moisNre, or
temperature, or lilY chan.e in climate,
either locally or re.ionally?
.
CI
CI
Comments:
The San DielO air basin Is a non.lUlinment air basin. '!be proposed project would
result In III increase of 97 units wi1hin die Eastlake Greens SPA. 1be emissions
from die ITaffic IIld ener.y aeneration associated with dlls project II DOt alJnlficant
when considerln. the overall aeneration of emissions. On. cumulllive basis, die
emissions from this project are 10 minimal they are not cumulatively aianlficant.
3.
Water. WIlIIhe Proposal reauh in:
m ',fAYB); tiQ
..
Ow\Jes In cumnu. or Ihe count or
direction of WIler IIlOvemenu. In either
IftIrine or freah Wllers'
o
o
.
b.
Ow\Jes In absorption 1'IIeI. drainl&e
paIIUftI, or Ihe ICe IIld amount of
lW1ace Nnom
.
CI
o
c.
Alterations to die course or flow or
fiood waters'
.
[J
[J
.....
WPCP:~O\17N."
;3-if/ / ~ ~ s-d-.
c. Disc:harie into larface waters. or lilY
aherUion of lurface weer quality.
inc1l1din& but IlOlIimi%ed ID ampcrlNJ'C.
dissolved osypn OIla1bidity'1
f. AJIerIZion of die direc:Ii<<I . DIe of
flow or paund WIJers'1
.. Can,e in the quantity of paund WIlm.
d1hu dlrouah dinclldclil:ions or
wilhd:awals. or dlrouah iDIa...ytion of
an aqaife:r b)' cats or acaVltions7
c
c
.
c
c
.
c
c
.
II. Sllbstantial ndllCtion in Ihc amOlll\t of
wiler otherwise available for public
Wiler IIlpplies7
L EltpOsure of people or I''''~rt)' ID wiler
ftllled hazards IIlCh IS tloodin, or
tidal wlves7
c
c
.
c
c
.
Comments:
The project aile' IIId vicinity do lIot involve lilY affecled IIlIrine or fresh w.. IIUS. flood
wilen. Wiler bodies. or known pound WIW. 'Ibm will be .11IIII01 c:banp In IbImption
lIIe which will !Ullh in minor.lcIs.than-1iJnifican1 c:banp in lUIIoff (lei JIacr from Dalnis
C. Bowlin, dlled 2f7/94).
.. PiaDt ure. Willlbe .....posll nsWt in: m~~
L OIan,e in the diw::niry of species. or
DWllber or any tpecie$ or pJanU (inc1udin.
treeS. ahrIlbs. pus. aops. IIId IqUIlic
planu)'! C C .
Il. ""'''';0'\ or the .... of lilY waIque.
11ft .1IIdanPnd IJ I III of pJanU'1 D D. .
Co 1Dn4~ of.. 41w, ftlp1InIIlnto
tato III .... .In . ....10 tile ..-1
1Il''-;~ ftI-Io..,"I j,J 1M' D D .
.. IedacdaD ID .... ftI fIf1 .---....1
crop7 D D .
o...4bmIS: .
'Ibe project . .... Ileen..s lor apIaIJNn1 JNl)avf lor .-...., ., fClIIfo"'" 1ft eow
pded ind IOftlI .... IIave ... developed (aIIIIfer...). 'IWI p.eral ... II ..s IS
&Iptar lIMOI)'. ~. willi cIIl1y .22.' ICI'I JIGt.... ID SPA ~ .. II -1fInJftCanL
~~CN""
% /~--f3
.... ,
..
5. Aalmal Life. Will die proposal resull in: m M6In .liQ .
L Owl,e in die diversity or lpCCies. or
aumben of lilY tpeCies or 8nima1s (birds.
land InimaIs includinJ reptiles, ftsh IIId
lbeUfish, _thic CllJlnisms or Insects)? D D .
.. Reduction or tbe IllUl\bcn or lilY anique.
nre or IIldInpred 11*_ or 8nima1s? D D .
c. InU'Oduction of new IpeCies of IlIimaIs
into III 1ft&, or result in . bInier to
the mipon or movement or animals? .D C .
d. Dewiorarlon to eWtinJ fish or wildlife
babiw? C D .
Comments:
'Ille project aite has been used for qricu1naral pIDpOIes for ~, IIld ponicm Ire DOW
ped and .ome IJUS hive been developed (U'lnSfer II'CI). 'Ibis ...._.1 II'CI b 8Ied u
Rlptor tenitoJ)', however, wiIh only. 22.7 acre incrwe in SPA -. tbilllllOt IiplficanL
6.
Noise. Will the proposal reswt in:
m M6XU 1m
L
Increases in eWtin, noise levels?
D
D
.
II.
Ezposlft of people to severe noise
lev.els?
D
.
D
Commenu:
Traffic volumes on roadWlys in IIld Idjacent 10 die JII'OjeclIlbe couJd Incn_ lllllient
DOise to III 1IftICCCPtlble level. At die time of OClIlIIdenrlon of . 1'o.dIdve
'lIbdiYiaion Map or DesiJn Review,."lemen&aJ 1COlIItical__~ wID .. r-. nd
far projeca Idjacent 10 OIuIa Villi 0enenJ Plan Clr-''''W1I'--' ..... At
..lime die ...,....- eleYldon or ftlIdwaya _ ........ .I"t ...a.. It.... WJlb
611 infarmlEion II wID .. fusible 10 ..a III r _... r 1- "... ..... -
.. ...,....".lIIe IIIIdption _a..... II; "IrY. .1>"1'" ... .... - ..
-W''''''. _cion .... DIW-Y ID 1Id'1lCt ........ .. .. .. ~'bJf 65
atIrior dBA (amL). n.e econn'-' mparu IIIIIIt .. tilled ....... ~
IIaftic 1\00 -,.. _ IIIIIIt \'11;"- tile .... -.... of.. " ...-c_ aA (OU!L)
. DId&n1
..
..-m
WI'C ..-~lN"""
.z;r;/r~y
7.
Ulf\lllld Glare. Will die JlI"OPou] produce
_w liaht OI,1are'1
m &m liQ
c c .
Comments:
1bi.s is primIrlIy . raidcntial projec:llhal wiD 1101 produce any lilnlficanl lie'" IIJhI or aWe.
II &hue are Ill)' DIlique ICIlIr'QCI ,.,,~ or ....t.Ii.It,ed.dley will . ftIUJated tbrouah die
pdarmance IWldards III die )I'_L-ipal Cock.
..
Lud VaL Will the ,.,,~a! rauh in a
IUbslantia! aha'ation of the presenl or
planned JaIId ase of III ..'1
m MADl JiQ
D D .
Commr:nts:
The proposed project is in a planned communir)' which II llltemaDy IllIftIIstMlIhaI
USUTeS ~d use c:ompalibility. The project apllllion areas 8ft wkhin IoJical
boundaries (the SDO&E transmissian Ilnes IIld East Oran.e Avenue). 'I'he ovenll
external compatibility has .en usured Ihrouah coordination with the Idjacenl O&ay
Ilanch. Otay Wller Disuicl facilities IIld SR 125 aliamnenL
9.
Natural Resources. Will the proposal result in:
m JsW:n liQ
L
Increase in the rate or use of lilY ftIlUrIl
resOlll'Ces'1
c
c
.
Comments:
There are no other ftIlUrIl resources Iucl1 u nnd IIId ....vel 011 .. which would be
impaaed by the JlI"OPosed project.
10. IUsk or Vpset. Will the proposal involve:
m~ JiQ
L
A risk or III aplosion or the nJease of
lwarcSous IIlbstancu (inc1udina. ~ 1101
limited 10 oil. penicide&. chemicals or
ndiaZion) . the eVIDt of III ~nt or
.. oondidans?
D
D
.
..
PossIble .....r..._A with III -....cy
IMpClIIIC plan . .. _.-"1 en, .Ml_
flan'
D 'D
.
01\4
:1'\11:
GiWlldIe ...... itIaI cUrl 1 fila pojIc:l6ere will Ie _ ~_ I flllIII.-doas
8lI&eriIJs aboYe .. I)'f'_t fII . ..1Ar -....1 1IIId... 1111 JI'DJIct will ,.vlldt adepIe"
. .1.tlon III die _ of die ..s lor IIIIYI-..c- . MpcIIIII plan.
."
I
WK...... -'\<JI m I""'"
....11
----
.?T J?~5j
11. Papulation. Will the proposal aher the location
disaibution, density, or JI'OWl rase of the human
popll1a:ion or III aru'
m MoUn 1m
c c .
Comments:
'I'be disUibution. elmsii)' CId JI'OMh of bousin& CId ..,1.";0II1D dIII....jecl_ _ftot-.t
wiIh plannin, for Ibis are.&.
12. Bousm,. Will the I",,~al affea aUtin,
~in,. or auIe . demand for additional
~in"
m~1m
D D .
Comments:
'I'be distribution, density IIld JI'Owth of housin,lIld population ill dill JII'OJecl- oonlllterit
with plannini for Ibis areL The project will utisf>' IIIher Ihan cnce IIoaIina demands in
this area.
13. TrusportatioDlCirculation. Will the 1""ywo>&Il't.Sult in: m JsW:n 1m
I
L Generation of substantial additional
yehi~ movement' C C .
b. Effects on existin, partin, facilities,
or demand for new plrldn" C C .
c. Substantial implCl Dpon existin,
transporwion systems' C C .
d. Alterations to present pllterns of
circulation or moVCmrlIt of people
and/or ,oods' D D .
.. AlImdons to WIlatlome. nil or air
traffic' D D .
f. ~ ill nft'ic IIIIIrds tD 1IIOl0l'
wbiele..1IicycUItI . padecians' D D .
.. A "JIrp project. __ the c.psdon
Manapmmt r...pm' (AD eqai"" of
MX> . IIlClII ... _ wbicIe . D D .
. 2iOO . IIlClII ,.u-lloar ...... c,.1..).
CIllaImInts:
'I'be project wi1I DDl ftIU1t ill III)' IfInl&:IIIt impacI tD <-
IIIeIIIO from Harold --tea. Tnf& .,... deled 2IZIIN. IDd ... flam M1J)'
'....I..ro. Vice I'JIIidal1, UJtlIn S)'IIemI AII-~. dIIed 2I111N).
WI't.. - -~CN_
....12
~ /J'<~?
,
1.. Public Services. Will lIle I" ")'Usa] have M &lfea apon ar _lilt in . Med IfII De.... ar Uered
IOvemme:ntal .rvice5 in an)' of &he loUowinI U'C&S:
m JrW:n 1iQ
L Fa pnucdon' See pile , of Appenclill m of die 1:1 1:1 .
IDi1ia1 Stud)' (CiI)' DI&a s.t.pjre Dept.) and
16 'Ilwsholds L PnIEMS below.
.. Police procecdon' See ClO...menlS in Olula Villa Police
DqIt. Crime Pftvention UDh, Plan Review .. ~on
dated 'JI4/94..d 161bJabolds .. 1:1 1:1 .
c. Schools' ,."" ""0: Deve1oJ.ment Co. ... IDIde the Eutlake
projects panicipll.e in CornnmnJty Pacilidel DiIlricts
'in 1he Sweerwller Union RiJh School Diftricl. 8Ild &he
Caula Vista Elementary School Dislricl to provide adequate
lChool services in 1he area. C 1:1 .
d. Parks or GIber ftCIWiona1 facilities'
The project wW be nquired 10 provide aquate .
communit)' ..d neiJhborboocl parks to .-ve 1he .
population of &he project. See InidaI Stud)'.
Appendix m. Parks " Rlc:naDon Dept.. ,.,e 7.
Also see 1911ecru%ion below. C C .
e. Libraries'! The Cit)' of 01111, Villa ClIn'Cftll)' operues
. library at1he campus of 1he Eastlake RiJh School
durin, &he houn &he 1Ch001librwy . DOl in operation.
On . Ionler limn *is. dwe Is . nquiremenl IfII . librwy
lite at Easllake VWa,e 8Ild . de~ ~,.... fee to
finance die facilit)'. C C .
f. Maintenlllce of public "..n~ea. ir'r1l1dinl
roads'! 11left will be DO IUbItImiIJ CII'.Nqae ImpICI III '
the aWnllnlllCC of IIl1 public fa:Wt)' . . w.ull of Ihe
IIIiaimaJ increut III .... .. to lIlia pojec:t. D D .
I. 0dIcr ~ olllr\1v", Olher 10'-....... .1St Ip' ....,
WIn IlCIdfiId and oc.r \- lid darIn. Ihe JDldatI1ud)'i
M DIhcr . j)ll~ f..1 1~.I"". ... idI:ntIftId. D .D .
15. lalrl1. 'WDldle r-.. -..'.-aJla: m MA%B 1iQ
L ' V. of aabIIIndaJ IlL ...;1 of fuel CII'
-l'IY' D D .
.'
~' /2"/57 ,...13
WI'C "....Il.AIlIIINCN-
b.
Substantial increase in demand upon
aistin, 'OlII'CeI or IIICIJY, or nquire
the development or DeW sources of
eneri)'7
c
c
.
Comments:
. project ..ould nault In . minor Inc:nur In' 1IlUI) nquIremenIs typical of .
pimIril)',.ldemiI1 project. nia wD1 DOl RIuJI. .lllbIundaJ _ of fueJ or -.,
8ClIf DeW IOlIRiC& of IIICZJY.
16. n,.bolds. WllI die "",jIOSIl advmel)' impact
6e Ciry', 1brahold SWldards7
m ltW:K tiQ
c c .
,
Comments:
AJ described below, die ......~~ project does .. adwacl)' ImpICt .y fIl 6e liven
1breshold SWldards.
A. FircJEMS
The 1breshold SWldards ~ dill fire .s IllldicaJ IIlIits mast lie able to IUpCIIId
to calls within 7 minutes or Jess In IS. or die cues .s wIdUn 5 _lJteI or Jess In
7S. of the cases. The City of OIula Vista Iw pA;-"'" thlilbis thrCdd IIIIIdard
will be met, ,ince the nwut ftre _Ill is en IIIDe ....)' .s ..ould lie .."""......
with .3 minute response time. . ~l)poscd project wD1 compl)' wtth Ibis 11Iruhold
SWldard.
See Appendix m to die Ini1ial Stud)', pale 16.
B. Police
The 'lbJuhold SWldards nquire 1har po1ice .au east IIIIpCIIICI to 14. of Pdorir)' 1
calls within 7 minutU or Jess .s malnWn III"'" ..... time .111 Priority
1 calls of 4.5 minutU or leIS. PoUce anits INIIl M,.o.ld to 62.IK ofPri-ir) 2 calls
within 7 minUlU or leas .s mainlIin III"'" ..... time to 111 Pdclrit)' 2 ca11s
of 7 minutes or Jess. .,."" DIed projec:l wD1 DlIIIlply wfIb Ibis no ....'" SW"-d.
lee ClllJMlCIIts In Qaula Villa PD1ice I: I ~... c::.m. r.., '- ua. PIa .....
k~ daIed 2141P4.
Co 'IDftk
ftI 'I1uIIhoJd II. f-cls _~LI..... ... 111 1 -'"... .. II J'" - . t.ft1 of
'rib (LOS) "C" or...... wtth 6e ~T-'" Lntlfll.... (LOS) "D" D)'
-=durinl6eputtwolloanfll6e,,_IIpa1IDd' - J->-- I' - ......-
... of 1-105 .. .. III lit-A. . LOS .... .. 111I7 LOS, No r · .01""1
..)' nacb LOS Tor"" durin& die..... _ I "A~ put 1Ioar. , -. ;(CIIII of
8ftIrials with _way nmpa.. II-....~ hID Ibis 1rV'''-4. .... p-.. an ~ snJect
wI1l ClOInJIly wIdIlbis 'J1InIhold ItIIldud.
I
WIC~~lN-
~ /,?,-Sr
.... i.
,
'I'bc project will nO! raWt in 8IIY IipdficClt impact IOtnnIpOftIti~
(tee memo from Harold Roeenbct&. Traffic Eqineer, dI&c.d 2Il1194.1nd liar from
Andy c"hl...ru, Vice President, Urban S~ A.Jo-l".s, dIIed 2111194).
D. Plzb,lRecrution
The 'lbnlhold S1IIldInS far Parb Ind aw-..:"" II J aaIllm popalIdon. .
.."jNWd project wm comply with Ibis 'nnIhold SIIIldIrd. .
The project wm be ft4.d1..c! to provide IlIeqaat llGIIIIIIIJftlty
_ lIei&hbomoocl pcb to laVe tile pop .'.tlOll or tile project.
E. Dninl,e
The Threshold Standards nquift IbIlIIDmI water flows Iftd ft1DmIIDOt ..~ City
EnJineerin, Standards. Individual projects wiD I""vidc . rrlr)' lalpmemcnts
consistent with the Dninaae Master Planes) IIId City EnJIneerina Standards. The
proposed project will comply wIIh Ibis 1bIuhold SIIndard.
See Jeuer from Dennis C. Bowlin,. Director Wiler a.oan:a Divldcm.m lick
EnJineerin,. dIted 2f1194.; nmo from Roler Daoust. Sr.:Civil Eqinecr. da1ed
2123/94.
f. Sewer
The Threshold Standards RqUire tha1 lewap flows Ind YOl1Jmes DOt ..-4 City
EnJineerin, Standards. Individual projects wiD provide ","1I1r)' ...!'."wemcnts
consistent with Sewer Master Planes) IIId City f.nIinecrinI SIIIldIrds. 'I1Ie l""I'OIr-d
project will comply with this 'lbmhold Standard.
See Jcuer from BNCC Sloan. Sr. Project MInapr. Eudab 1>neJ"...... Co.. da1ed
2/9/94: memo from Ro,er DIlNIt. Sr. Qvil EDP-r. dIIed 2IZ3J94.
G. Water
'I1Ie '1'IlnIhold S&II\dIrds ...pL. .. IdeqlIIII ..... - ...... ..,. _MImI
flcilides 1ft ~ wi ...dly willi fI.-...." powdl .. .. - fIUUt>'
IIII\dIrdIIft DOt jeopIrdized .........6_....... .. ..-. anf pvject
wID CIDIDJIly wIdIlhls nn r"~~ . "-4.
App1il:aml-r 60 be .....&L..d to ..;.I't .. wit . _.... . I --. lie
eft.. ......._11. tile Or)' or QmJa Villa .. .. ...... . till .... or ~ JIIImIl
iInIIIce.
17. B.au JIIIlIh. \WI tile .._.~.., IIIUJI in:
m HADi 1m
L
a.-....O'l or .y IlIa1dl ... . ,.""'.'
IItaJdl ... (,..."..c,.. __0 1IeI1Ih'1
D
D
.
I
Wl'tJl -~CN""
ftIIU
,;t{ I tf-" ->1
..
b.
ElIpOSU%'e of people 10 powuial health
Iwards7
c
c
.
Comments:
ne project lite nor tile DpCtIIion or tile project wouJd nnJllII IIlYIfInIftc:IN IlNJIh bazIrd
.111 uposu:e 10 1UCh. hazard. PJNse afer 10 ..ru...cu In.l above.
lB. I.lItbetics. WW tile .....~ IIIU1tlll:
L '!be obItrucdon or anylCeDic willa or Yiew
open to tile public. or will tile ,...~
.IUWt in tile aution of an lIesthcdca1ly
offensive lite open 10 public yjew'
b. The dtstNcdon. or modification or. anic route']
m KUH 1m
c
c
c
c
.
.
Comments:
The project will not obstruct any public Yiew or YiIw. cnate any dlmanllrable .prive
aesthetic effect or, II this level of review. impact . ..uc route.
~
19. Recreation. Will tile proposal result in an
impact upon tile quality or quantity of uiatina
ftQUtional opporNnities7
m..Id6m 1m
c c .
Comments:
The project wID be required 10 net tile recnarional needs of iss ...!dew In IaXIIlIInce wish
City park aandards which include recrulionll facility 1lIndards.
20. Cultural Resources. m..Id6m 1m
L Will the proposallUWt in tile Ilteration
of CII' tile cleswcQon CII' . prebiIIaric CII'
~ II'ChuoloJical aile'1 .C C .
. WiD tile .....,..Aa1 nnJllII Idvme
..
JIh)'Ik:aJ &If .abide etrecu to .
pehistoric . IIiItaric 1luDdin&. DICtaI'e. C '1:1 .
. obj8c:t'1
Co Doll the ~ uw the "r.dv 1t.'1D
... .
__ . JIh)'IicaJ dlInp wbIch would 1:1 1:1 .
affect anique IIbnic culIura1 ftllllS'
d. Vall the ... .....,sa! nIIricI aiIlinJ
lI1iIious &If IICI'Id .... w!lbin Ibc 1:1 1:1 .
pnlill impKt ....'1
_~CN_ % ) %-tf:,C7 .... 16
e. Is Ib~ ITU identified em Ib~ Cil)",
. Ge.ne:ral Plan EIR as I/lITU of hiih
potcntia] for arcbeolopcalresourc:es'?
D
D
.
Comm~ts:
Set Section 5.2.3 (Pl. 5-3) of m....6-4 (SdI: 16052803).
21. faleClllloIoatcal RlIOlIrceL W"JIJ the ....,.-l1Wll1t ill die
aIIenlion of Clr the deltrucdem of pUontoloJlca1
..ources' .
.m Jd6IB lIQ
D D .
Comments:
Set Section 4.7 (Pl. ~75) ofm..a6-4 (SdI: 16052.28(3).
22. MaDdatol"1 F'lDdiDp of Siplficance.
.xu awn !!Q
L
Does Ib~ projeCl hive Ibe potential to clepde Ibe
qualil)' of the environment, I1IbstantiaIJy reduce
the habital of I fish or wiJdlife 1pICies. cause
. fish or wildlife populaDon 10 drop below lelf
IUSlIininI levels. dIrulen to eliminate . planl
or animal communiI)'. .slICe Ibe DI11IIber or
nsuiCl the ranle of . nre or IlldanleNod planl
animal or eliminlle imponant esamples or the
major perioc1s of Califomia bislory Clr prebiJlory'1
;
D
.
D
Comments:
~ has been noted above In this chectJist. the .. II YOid of III)' 1lio10Jlcal RICllIftleI IIld
Iheref~. would have DO liinificant impact CllIIIY of these IUCIUI'CCI. 0aJnn] IUClUrC&S
(prehistoric I/ld historic) have _n pmiousty 1Dltipled., DO Iwdc IClion IIllICUsary.
b.
Does Ibe projeCl have die JlClCINial to IChieve
lhoMcrrn .0Ils 10 the diladYllUlp of lana-
~ IllvinwDeDtaJ .0Ils' (A Ihonem
tmpacl OIIh IIIvtranmcnt II .. wbicb .... ill
. ftllrive1y Iiriel, ddWdve pIriod of lime,
while Jan.4:nD IInpaca .w ...don weD iDIo 6e
fuIure.)
D
D
.
r A'1 .IdS:
'Ibe ....,.-4 projlc:l ClGGfclrm . .. Qa1a Viall ~ -.1 PIID .. ~ .4\-." projea
..,tiel wkb the Jana III'ID ._ of... CiIy of QaJa Villa ,. ... ..
..
.
",17
WI\: ......fI,;\IOGlICN'IJUoI
g /J'/~/
c.
Does die projed have impacts MUch aR
indivldu.&1ly Jimile4. bul aunWatinly
CCNlderab1e7 (A projed IDlY Imp&ct twO ar
more ICpm%e ..ources wtlcre Ibe Impact on
each resO\lTCiC is ftWive1y IftIIll, IIut wbere die
de::( of &be 10&11 of diose ImpIcu ClldIe
_viraDment islflnlfant.)
D
D
.
Cunlfllalts :
'Ibc project tmpa.ca aR 10 JimiIed 10 pnclude III' 1fInI&Inl.,.-n1at1ve .,"" ....._e
01 air quality impacts. die Jncreue of 97 ... or a mufmUIII of 970 ADT. ~ to die
aiItina. W IppI'Oved units and ADT, tile ~T act II adnimIJ INS _than ~ Also.
the lite is yold of any .iJnificanl biolop:alor c:uJIIn1_oarca INS ~ IIIOlJI'OCS
wiD be fuIly mitilued. . .
d.
Does die proje.el han environmental effects
which wW cause I\Ibstantial advene effects on
human beinls. either directly or indirectly7
c
c
.
Comments:
At die time of considCl'l1ion of. Tenwive Subc!iYilion Map or Dufan RevIew, 1lIJ'P1Imental
8COustical nports wW be preplftd for projeds adjacent to QauJa Va General Plan
~u1alion Element Iloadways. At that time the precise elevadon ofnllllwayslNS ftlidcntial
denlopment pads. With this infontllrion it will be fluible to IIIIb III r '" fancast of
Boise levels IIId die appropriale miliIation measures aeceaary to Rduce IIOiIe levels and die
appropriate mi1i,ltion measures IleCCII&f)' to ..succ Dolle levels to 11\ acapcabJe 65 uterior
dBA (CNEL). These acoustical ftPDrlS must be IluecI ClldIe IaIeIt 1luDd0lll1lllfic fcncast
and must validate die achievement of the 65 emrior dBA (omL) DIllard.
..
.
....1.
-.c: ....I\,AIIIGIICN-
~ /y---tf,;2,
..
MiCiptioD Measures
ero be completed by the Applicant)
1.. owner/owner in .crow.
~ur.l. 10./. S<.D"'N
>>. "'12f'}':! .. E~ tilJd ~..
I'IW IlII'ne
or
1. amrubnt or IICnt.
~"'............... _to..... __ """".
Z 11.~ !iif
SiJnarure DI&e
DetermiDation
ero be completed b)' the Lead Alene)'. 01WI: one box onl)'.)
On Ibe basis of 1his initial evallWion:
C I find thll the proposed project COULD NOT have . IiInificant -<<let CIIl the
environment, and a NEOAnvE DEt"'1 "JlAnON wiD be JftPIIId.
. I find dill althouJh the I" ",..,.ed project ClOI11d IIave . IfInIficInt IIfect CIIl the
environment, there wiD not be aliJnlfiClllt effeca in this CIIe --.., the lIIItiIadon
IIlCISIIJ'C5 described CIIl an IRaChed Iheet IIave IIeen Idded 10 the pojec:L A
MITlGATEO NEOAnvE DFrl .uA nON wD1 be prepared.
C . J ftnd the I"".,oscd project MAY IIave ..qzll&lIIl1lfect _ the ..~ "" 4,IIId an
ENVDlONMEmAJ. JMPACJ' UPOJlT II aqulnd.
N~cl'Y
~ ~8.~fo(~~L
IDviraGmINal RevieW . or .
.
D8Ie
~...,.. ~ po.. I~ 1Dd...~ ,..'1....
,"
Wk~CN-..
.Jf5' / 2" ~ & ;J
.... l'
"
Cue No. ~~. ~ 4' 1'1
APPENDIX n
DE MINIMIS FEE DETERMINATION
(CbIpter 1706. S&IZlIta of 199O..u 3158)
. II is IIcftby found IbII tbis pojecl inYOlYel DO I ..... 01.1 far III)' IdvenellFec:L..tr
Wjvidually ar CIImII1aziveJ)' 011 wUd1ife ..CIlIICII ., .. . "CIrd&:aIc of Fee
Eumplion-,1haD be prcplft4 far Ibis projecL
II is hereby found IbII tbis projecl couJd potentiaDy ......1Ct wDd11f&. WiYIduaU)' ar
camulativeJ)' IIId 1herefore _In accordance wiIb 5-1011 '711A (d) ofllle JIiIh IIId
Game Code Ihall be paid to IIIe CelanI)' Clerk. ___..,... ~cl
~~,:).c..:>.""", ~,,~~. ~,Q. ~_ ~'-D."c ~~
, ~.., .1S~ ::>~~~~'\ ~ \0.1'\ .
~ ~.;.Jf-le,f)~)
Environmenw Revi 'II Coordinator
&~f/'i ..,
Due
"
....:aD
wtC~lN-
% /~---b'i
.
.
Cue No. IS .q'l-ll\
APPENDIX UI
CITY DATA SHEET
'LANNlNG DEPARTMEf\'T
1 ~OII.: . ~~--.lJr--........,.""
Nonh.. oJ . ~
: SOllth 10 ..
last . ., .
~~ i ~
JL
Does the pro~ CIlll'Ifcmn 10 Ibe .l>....A ~,
~ land ue dcslJllIti 011 Ihe: -
Nonh 0
SOllth
East _'7..... _ ""-r'--- J"~-1~ _...~ ,~ I)vJ"~"")
West -L ~~ II .,-
,...., 1Jr~----, ~ ~
Is Ihe projtCt compatible w1lh die General PJan Land UIe ~, ---s ~ -
Is die project area dcsiJll&tod for CClIIICrvlZicm Dr open IpICC Dr lIS... 10 . .. . *dpatc47
~--
m.
Is die project loeated adjacent 10 Ill)' scenic routes'
(II,,'~ ...~. .-...- '-"'''
;~~~~-~~~';:".I-:fi'-
~~ ~ .
If die proposed projtCt is ftlide.nlial. pkuc compJac Ihc foDowtn,:
IV.
.......",.
UIlIIa l' II I " IlId
~ pttleltv ~I . -" J- ~
po ''7 ~.u."~' - - .7 .. a.,
"HiIb ..,..&V'..;~ ., oM .,V
....HiIb ~ tf7 ..10 .0
~~:~:~~~
~~.
I>ftc:Iar rI 1aMin& Dr ~
_...___ .______.__.~ "t"\~ """1
A:r
....1
-
.
APPUCAnON CANNOT BE ACCEPTED UNLESS SITE
PLAN IS fOLDED TO fIT INTO AN 8.1/2 X 11 FOLDER
INITIAL STUDY
Cry or Ollila Vista
App1iclzion Form
A. .ACKOR.OUND
I. ProjectTuJe .ll.!tl.h Gr..n. GDP/IPA ...nlSm.nt
2. . Project l-";on (Stre.euddrm CIfdllcrfldon~..t of IIt-U5, .orth of.
Orange Av., louth of otay Lak.. .d.~.graph canyon .a.,
. and Welt of Hunte P.rkw.y. .
ADason Book. 'lie" ParccJ No. IIA ""
3. Brief Project Description 'lh. ro .ct 1. a uan.fer of D.O. within the .
exi.ting Z..tl.k. Gre.n. IPA (no net ncr.... an f
the SPA boundary (22.1 ac aDd '7 dute.efer to attached ~ect oeser!)
4. Name of Applicant Zut1ake Oevelopm.nt Company .
Address tOO Lane Av.., Ite. '00 Put 421 ~1I30 .....~
Cit)' Chub Vista Slate CA Zip.,Wn
5. Name of Prcparer/Apnt Gary tinU - tinU Land Planning
Addrus 3625 Midway Dr., f2t2 Pad 223-5108 ..... :nJ_'U DB.
Cit)' Ian Di.90 lwe CA Zip '21'.0
ltcWion to Applicant l.and Planning Consultant
6. IndicaIe III permilS 01' approvals nlllClcllmw CIf do _ _AI nqahd 111'" IaYironmentaJ
Reyiew Coordirwor.
L Permiu or approYlls nquired.
-:r o..r.J Plan .6.-.I"ICIll
.4,.1aaDtIPracne . .
_ CIr1diIIa PIrmII
__ ~ Psn:d Map
_1iII PlIII A Mh. amew
. _.. 1>, Ute PwmII
1 DllIIJII ...... Jfp'~'loo-
:K""'1ubd. Map "
_' '.'. . A1*,OPA
. ' ~_. . ~ : DDA
_ , .,
_1'ldIIIc I'IojDc&
+ .a -..~
IfJnjscc II, GInen1 PIan~..". f - .....~
10
..... (II ~ 111"'",*"
II.
.
_ CIrIdiDa Plan
_1Wca1 Map ,"
. _.... PIul
_Ipc\nc Plan
_ 'IlID'1C IIIIpIct IIpon
_HuItdoua WUl& ..
IncIclIlIra CIf 'a
1It1ll'
_AnlLlII\lIIl11l1
. _'" po Plana
_ 'hDlalhI Md..Map
::~. . ...
= IIpart
_VI f" L 'all IIpan
~ J?'j,f,
,
_Ipclllc Plan
. r ....a-.,.... ~l
-
_ VIdIDce "
X~~liu
.
" .. .JL_-." i .....- hili
. .
.
ta' ..... CDaIdiDator).
=~~.'
....- .1t,-'1lud1
-Nolle. t
= 0lIIIr Aj J..... .
~QlIIar .&'o,.ct Du~dpU
..
.
.8. PROPOSED PROJECT
J.
L
. ' ,161.. C_enc5. are.)
Land Area: ~lIarc fool&Je . . or 8CftIIeJl"'" , 'SPA are.)
If land IIU 10 lie ded.iClled.1Ule lCftIIe Il)d ~e.
b. Doa Ibc projec:c involve Ihc ClDIlIWCIion of ..wIluUdinp, or wIlI-"" ItrUcIlure lie
...n;....~ 7.., .e. Project DescdpUon. .
2. CorIIJlJcu Ibis lICdoa.1I projoclil JII1dsmiIlor .IlIIIt.II& .
. L Twe or ckveJo~SkllJc FamDy _Two FamIly ~MuI&i Family
_ Townhouse _ CDDdomInJum .
b. Toea! numbet or ICnICIWU 287 1 naldeJ,Ual tlu ..rat ttt.1S
c. Maxlmum hciihl orlUUClUrCl .ari.. per P.C. l>1atzict 'evulaUons
d. Nwnbu or Units: I bedroom IIA
2 bedroom II A
S bedroom IIA
.. bedroom IIA
Toea! Uaiu 2871
c. Gross dcDsir)' (l)U/IOW ecru) ~ _ .
f. Net densir)' (l)U/locaJ -=- mln.. 811)' ded.ic:adon) S. 6
,. f<<i,...."'(! projecl population to be tI.t.rm1D.1S
II. Ifti'Nfed ale Of nntI! price nnje to be det.raiDelS
L Square footqe or IZN=ure to be d.tera1DecS . .
J. Percent or Ice OOYWlp b1 IIl'l1c:li/lal or 1InICIIIra..Jler P.C: '.plaUon.
1. Numbu or... putina ~ 10 lie r..,'ltl~ oar '.C. 'ewl.Uons
L Percent or lire In road Md ....., IUrface ~o tt. d.t.ra~nelS
X Complete 1biI1ICIi0ll1l projocl II mmmudll or ildIIIdIl or JDIulla.
L T,pe(.) or land IDe
It. fJoor 1\1'&I IW.Iht .,. n ~
Co 1)pe' or.-ucaJaa ...s In ... - "'5
.
do
hcd1lc ~ -: I II "'10 fie..- _ _.. .~
.as A '"
.
': ._ "'--0..., r. 1~1
L
f.
Number or....... JIIItilIl Il - .....ideeS
EIdmIIed _bet of emplo,,- ,.1hIft
NumIler or Iblfu TCICI1
~-td DlIIftbcr or..... (par daJ) IIld .... of -'-
. 0- . .
. '
..
. .
ft /~/d>?
.
h, Estimated number of ddiveries per day
i Estimaled ran,e of anice aru and ~is or estimate
j~ T)'pt/Ulcnt..of' operadons aoc fa -clllltd WIdinas
. It. HOWl or operation
L Tp of' wcrior liahlinl
~. ,J(projeab~.-w-.."."OlW m..QaJ."iI..~I~'~_"~ClIl.
.. .. 1)pe of' projec:t ,
.
.
"
II. Tp of' '-Ill.l. provided
"
C-
d.
SqlllR feel of' end.....~ I&rUCIurcs
lkilhl of' IWClIIrI(s) .lIiwmwn
1Jlzimate OClCUpItlC)' load of' project
Number of' on-cite parkinJ .,..... to lie "voided
SqlllR f. of' ftIId Ind ..WId IlIIfaces
Additional projea characleristics
. '
.
c.
.
f.
"
IL
'.
.
'.
Co PRQ1ECf CHARACTEJUsnCS
.
1. W"U1 che project lie nquind to otuiD . pcrmIr Ihrou&fa Ihe AJr~ CIIIIrQt DiIIricl ~)?
Jo.
.
., . . .
JaIn10J11of'pdIna..__..II....._..Jft)-.........", IT' ~".e: em future
If' ,.. .mpl...... foDowInJ: " 'Ii ccu.
.. I.....odl~ nnchaIlD ..1IIc:tfbIed. - ~ ~ ,..".... ... .. ""YIled7
JA .. , .
How"'1"1lic ,.,. II ID .m'.. ,h~n IIA
How... .. <.;. ... _>.m.. ......1 n D
Mar wIII..111c: ~. . ...."_ IIA
.A......."_ . IIA
MuJmam,"" il mr IIA
A..... ...."ID ~
2.
..
Co.
..
"
.
.'
.
..._.J--IloNIIIII:J_.-.Ow..tltlot__ltlot"-'l % )~_,?~
,..J
.
D.
3.
I
Describe all eneray consumina devices wIUc:h are pan or che proposed projea ~d Ihe type or
enerJ)' usc.d (air conditionina. eJeeuicat epP1iance. lleazina equipment, etc.)
N~~.' ..ci~.n~i.l .".rav a.e.
.
4. Wl(oIOC Ihc amOlW oIl1111nJ CIJ*IIJIIC& IhIl II pen fIl,.. JfVJea "" A. or au)
.one.
5.. If ahc pro.;ec;, wI1J IalIJr III MyepJO)'ll*ll CIppClIQInIdeI deIc:rIbe Ihc -. aDd Q'pe or Ihc5e
. .
jo~. Constru~t10n relate~ jobs.
".
6.
W~ laiihIy flammable or JlOCIIUia1Iy aplodYe aIINJs or 11/'.,1 L ?t" -.cf or Ilored widl1n
. .
the projeclsi1e'! NA
7.
How D'III1y ~ed automobile Irips, pet clay, wW .. ,.._~ -tlJ1he proJecti .one 1ft
.xc~ss of those .~~resse~ in prev1ousZIR.
..
. .
Dacribc err MY) 011'. impro._-4I 81 . r '-"7 III .,"-. I Ihe pvJec&. aDd tbcir poinll or
.ac:cas or conncccion to Ibe pio,;eci.. ~ .....,.,. ... DOC "'''<<J 10 Ihe IoUoWin,:
IICW acrec.cs; a&reel ~ alaISloa or ps, ~r Ccrk. ., ...1aeI; .. _ &II aIopa; 8M
ted'lCrian and bic)de fIcIlicics. .one in .xce.. o~o.. Dredou.l v .
1dent1fie~ for ~. Cr..ft.. ~r.f.p ~ft ....~.~. ~...~..rr.).
."
I.
.~
Hu a polol)'.usy ... _ ~_...... fie ~-r-""III We., 8.. ...t18ke Gnens ZIR.
" (II,., ,r., 8&&adl)
... a. Rpoft .. Ihe projlc:c lire ... .., J... 8.. __.t1ate 8I'Ha. ZIR.
(II JII, ,r'ln 8Uach)
.
2. .IIxdmJm
. Are MY of 1M loDowtna feaIura r 11M.. or ~ IOIhe lite,
(II ,., ap1aln In deraIL)
L " II Ibcre lilY ufIce evil' .. of. 6aUow .~Id ..... ..we, .0.'
."'
.
gf /J""'~')
.- - .--- .-----.-. ..--. --- _..
'.
b.
An &hm Ill)' wllercoW'lel or drainqe improvements on or IdjlCellllO the lite?
~n Qreviously approved f.~111t1e..
Does nanofT from the projea lite drain direaI)' in 10 or IOWa . cIomudc: Wiler luppl)'.
Jab. l'IIerYoir or bay? No.
Could drainaae from Ihe lite CIUIe lnIIlon or lilradonlO IdJacent....' .0tenUal _
exist., but would be mU,ated ~y oolld1Uona &0 lrU~un 2'.2'. iup
beac:ribe III dralna,e '-I1ltltr 10 lie JlI'l>r'''r~ _1IlcJr..on. '.Po h. determined
ture aubmittal. and reviou.l approved tract ..p.
c.
d.
e.
3. !iW
... Aft Ibm Ill)' aoile "'-_ in .. projecc W:inky wtaida -.y ..... T~ Ihe project .,
No. Future arterial. "1 t.pact .ome .r....
b. Will noise from the projec:c iIIIfI"t Ill)' _ltive ncepccn (hoIpbals. 1Choo1s. linlle.
famil)' lUidences)? No.
<C. Jjolorv
.. Does die lile involve'M)' CoUll! S.,e Scnab "pillion? ___0.
b. Js die projea lite in . AIIIIrIJ or pania1/)' IIIhIrIJ ~? No.
C. If )'a. has . biolop:aJ 111M)' ... Cllli.cIlICled em ibe JlIOJICft)'?
Yes v No (Pieue .flllc:ll. CIOp'.).efet &0 previou. EIIt.
d. Dacribe all ana and vepwion em Ibe lite. IRdicate Joc:adan, IIeIah&. ",-__. IIId
IpCCics of ana. and 1rbich fd III)') wDIlle _wed II1Ihe P'DJect. ~lIIi-
developed with ~ellln.nt. of previo~. dry r~ll~
,r.zing on.the ~amaln~er&
5.~
.. Aft ..... III)' boWD Wltor$&:ll or -".6OJoP:aI'I r : III _ fa f ~ em _ _ die JInI.iea
aile? 110.
,
.. . Aft Ibere III)' inowa pt'l 'OI~~ lliDUI.-7.,O.
Co Have .... "'11\1 a..-----1II ....... "~I ~ J d fII_1IIIlnd em ~ _ ilia JII'DJIa lite?
110.
do Wbat was"land ......,...., Dry f~D,/Catt1. Fa.1ft,
,"
.
~.:r"j7a~aI4"lIII. "'''I_lmtJI
~ )~-?t:/
.._c
6. ~UTTenl Land Use
L Dc$aibe all JU\lClura and land uses cwrr.ntly cWtin. onlhe projeCll1le.
..See answer below..
b. Describe aD SCNc:IW'a and land lUCI CllIn'IIIlJ)' 1I1IIinI- ~ P'DJIat1.
North auUake aUdD." Center . .'
.~ Vacant Otay aanch - fUture ..Y.lope.n~
East Vacant - rutureaasu'i'k. IId'jJiborhOOCS.
1Vea aastlak. 81gh School/Communi~k &D~ fU~ur. aeve~opmer
.
~ ~ .
.&_.;.- u_ lfQ1\e on parce18 >>roPO..4 f9r .n.tncr....
. L ftR - an)' "'_11 on *7. 1I'1O.1IOW"1IlIIl)"'l ~ u"Us.
II. Ale Ibetc anY CUITe:nI empJO)'IIIIIIId ClppOI'IUnJdea en aile, 110.
If 10. how man)' and wtw type'
.. 'k.ase provlde any other Wormation wbich may IIIiIl ill Ibc ..-1o...t. f111bc ""I' : I i ~ 'pro_
Sites have been full .Yaluat.~ 1n".tlak. Gr..n. SPA EIR an~
r.c.nt Gen.ral Plan Amendment ZIR for I&n~ vap ar....
See .1.0 attache~ proj.ct Da.cri~or .aal~OD.~ Q&~..
.
..Answer to 6(a): Construction/.tructure. exi.t. on .pprox. one-half
of ZastLake Gr.en'. 'arcel. propo..4 for "'n~-
lDent with .d.Ung structur.. .r. ODly "1ng
amen~e~ to reflect axi.ting con41t10D. w1th DO
increa.e in unit..
.
. .
.
.
"
'M )ff///
D.....J~F..-~.I~UJ4...&M..."J~ICUJ) .
.... ,
E, ~RTJFlCAi10N
t . ffftfI11IZ!0'ffDG In .crow.
...t1.~. n.veloDment Com~aDY
~rue. Sloan. Pro1eet Manager
Print..,.
or
t CIlllIIIbnt ar .,ent.
Pri,lllllllle
.
"
HEREBY APfIRM. 1hal to. the best or Ill)' klief. the ICIIemIftIlIlld inIonnIdOl! ... -IW 1ft III aD
~ InIe IDd c:omcl and 1hal all boW1l Wormadon oancemIn& the project IIld III IIUin& Us Ileal
....Inded In litis application for an InWal SlUd)' Df possible Illvironmenra1lmplCt IIId III)' 1ftCI0lIlftS for
8I&IChmcnts themo.
.
~
--,
0wIlu.0wncr III Escrow SiIMNre
or
~. Apu SipINre
i / II /'/4-
. , .
~
-.If a:&iI& for . ClDIp,indon. include apacIl)' IIId 0llIIIJIIn)' ....
--..""'.--- ....----.-. . -.'" --..'" .--.
frf' /J'r?;4
.
.'
....."1
INITIAL STUDY PROCESSING AGREEMENI'
MIme rI AliD1icant EuUake Development Company
~ .00 'Lane ~v.., .~.. lUU
Dry: Chub Vista IIIIC CA
..... fJI AIIhari&Id....."" (lf~): ....."'. .lrian
~ onn Y..". av. ...., no
Diy . ,..,,,,,,,. Uf .... Iua t:A
~--*,llCAt ~I'"
I' . "IlAlDouN: 1150.00
=-~
.... ." .n",
ZIp .un
.
'Ail ~t rA...--....~ ...-_ .. 0lJ fJlQuIa ViIII.. ~ _~"
IIId lhe ~ IPPliClll\ far. 1aIIIIJ Stud)' rAW' r),1IIIc:IM. rllIic ~
Ii -.de willi Ill.... to lhe falIowIn, fica: .
'WIar.n:as, Ihe Appli=nl 1m applied to lhe Oty far IIIIU1&1 Slud7 oIlbc 1Jpc.r-.c~ : I ~ rillltial
SllIdyj wllich Ihe Cily Ills nqultl4 Ul III obcaIned u . W"~;11ooI to.- '.~,.. ""'. 01 to *WlIop. pII'Cd
01..._'1); Il\d.,
.., iii -.'"
.. -. III 1:11 \ ____... I
. DIll. iIIIIIlDCM,
WIlrnas.lhe CIty wW IInr ......1Il..... to pl : IIId IIIIIIII S1IId7 ~ lbc ..... '1111 ~ . -.
IIId Wen Ihe VIrious IIClIvdIIIld 0DnlIDlIIi0nI oIlhe Or)' m . .. ku' "): _
WIlcnas.Ihe JIUIPC* of &his ......mehl laID Nimburw lite Or)' far IIIwy III will.. II w '100-
willi pnMdin,lhe f'I in, s.vlca:
No,... IhcRrcn. Ihc plInieIlIo 1Ilnb)' ..,.. IIIl1d11nae far lite 8IIIUII ..-_ ... - "'''Cd. .
follows:
1 Aflpliclnl'. Dul)' 10 PI)',
'I1Ic Applic:anl IND ID), all 01 lite 01)'...... -' ,.4 ill fnMdIna i . .. .. ..aIIIed ID
II'P';-'l\'.lnilill SlIId)'.IIIdIlllin, all 01... QI)". 6st IIId .... . __....... t 4l.. nil dul)' fJI
lbc Applic:anl W1I III 11111714 10 .... . lite -App'~'. Dul1 10 PI)'.-
A. Aflp1icant'. Dlpasil Dul)'
AI ,.wi perfCl'llllllCll 01.. App" ". DuIJ 10 ..".. A.. . J tflIII r J I ']"-.nt
.,--r.. n ~ rDlpollI").
. . . .
I. ne a.11111111 ..... III lawful., JII' ,.4 II f-./- . i ' J ~,J
'epInalllte AW' 11"1'. 'J W,......" " . 01 ~ ' ... !rfl.w II'.
III&iII Sllllf1,lIlJ JIlIIIaIl 01..1'. II. 'r" ac, I11III_...'. 10 ..
.,' II.......... r .. .... .. .. . J ".. ." ..1IIIIaI
...".... MIIo1...r~ 11" ..... -~ .Ii....' (.1'...,.... I
......_~ III ........ it.. ac"....... "-,,.. ac" "1J. . . ~
.....wIJIl ....dlk ... ........ ...... . .. 011.... . '".. 'ofy
II I to .... 10 ...... J\, . I .... fta ...., ".. //W. .. 10
1JlIliDII)' lIIpaIilllld ID "',' .1IIcI.... . ... IA,AId aIlIII .. ..... . ..
-AlP" IJ', E' . I ~1 Dut)"', '
D. CIl)". Dul)'
..
,.. C'il)' IItIILlfOlIlIte ..a_ ... tie //W' IJ II IOl III .... 01 lite A... . r.. DuIJ ...., .lbc
1oW.....t.. DlpaliI Dul)'.-1DCId falJh 10 ........... '\1.,... -'-'loll 10".' ,,'.1IlkiaI
1Iud)' II'PIiCllliorL j2f /8- ~ ?} .
,
?!
f!
o .
"" ,. ... ,.' . .... [ ,. ...
tll:~ f' Ii, l'I~(g~ J 'lIlt J
9 _ .. > 1', 'I ~" J II ~ I. '< 1 '< e, i f I o"l : oil J M.:c
~ i I r: J. ;r Ii .. 8.. .: .. fi s' (! ~
r c'f~ B !t,.f~ I ~ ...... t if
I 8 .(, 1'. I! I J'< ~ (!O~f if-If.' :1 If. ;r=
I ROC ,I "I' ~.,r.i- ;i~II' II" ril.1 ,....Ii "If
. i I' I r.. 'III I .1 Ill. : . J I . f. i ! I ( & S I
I '" I I . 8 .. '< J 's i , : I '.J ' ! .!II f .
J'" 'f". .llff fff
III iU ! rf gt:
at I r h !! r . Hi . ! t J . ~ J .1' II i i!
if!.. :I! '=i f)
t'tl I 1." 01 1'1 8"',1 , '!' tf
. . J.t .11 In..In . ni !!i f:r if
.'
~
'-...
~
\
~
"
.
.
'1_, 0.. t
f q J . .
1i' I a' , " , . '"
I Ii {l'lzo.r, l'll'ttll f
. Ii," , q 9 1 ~ 5' ft. .1 ~ I ! f ~
I ~~ ~9f~ $8 f~- [
-) ,. if! IZ ;. I $ 1'[ ~ I j I! G
I~ r III~! I '.-1-1, .11
. lot a-::~J II .,!.. Illoc
~l rJE'li~ I'IIJ&I
;.1 f i ffr} I Ii "-II
H r ~ ~ll! it . !1[H~~ I iiftl)~lfl
~:.... '!E t I$JI"91 ! .11 It
....
o
.r~
{l. 't' fflf',. . . .f)1 --al
;~ i IIII~11f ..R t~111
~ ~t; if1d!t' jif!ifll
a 11 rl!!I if' 1I'I$"lr
I ~ .~
"
.
!
1m crrv OF CHt1L4 \1SJ'A DJSCLOS1JRE STATEMENT
... "I of diId_ of.wza -mlp iDaIrau. pi)' ". . CIIIIIpIIp~. _Ill _en which
.w I'IqIIIft ";'-'1"'11')' aiOll_ dlc pan of dlc Cil)' "'-'I''''.I'IIIIIII& - 1--' _1I11l11er I6:iaJ lIodla.
.... WIowiD& lAfonMliOIl_ .. .1_IDled: .
I.
UIl dlc __ or III .- __ ~ . .. '.f ..... ~ iI!c
-.riallllJlPliu .
..ctl.k. n.v.lobmant Comcanv
-.t. ..... ......8IIIcawIc:lor.
2. '. If 8IY .... IdIIIdfied _ .-. (I)'" II ..ll.,_ llole....~ "'P." .. _ or III
Ildividlllil..-,'lI - ... 10" or 1M .... ~ 1M __ r rl . __ , 8IY .-_ . 'P IiIIIInIlID
.. pIIl1lUib1p.
., ~ .1"\_'-1_"
J. llaay pII'IOIlldlllllfild au-z 10 (I) IIIoft II III ,",81..,..-. . . .... .. .. __ of 8IY
JiClIOll-maa. diraor ofdlc -otntllllp"l-.IoI.. _.~._ ofdlc 1rIISl.
"'1.
c.
IbYe JOlIIIId - dIID 1250 ~ of --- . _.~ willi 8IY
ClDmmiuIOIlI. CoIIlIIIIaea ad "'--II wiIIIID dlc JIIIIWIhI auW'?
No .
. lor.. ~..w. 8oudI.
,
5. f'kut IdlIlllfy ~ ad IWII)' "".1IdUdiD& 8IY ..... .111).. .-. . t~ ,INICIlI
-=-cton "0 rOll ~ _iped 10 ~ ""' Wore .. Qty III lIIII ~.
a~h S.n~o.. Kent A~en. .rue. Sloan, &a~y Wr1vht
.
6.
-- rou .,. ,., ---
- "~dlc"'."
- ~I):
............. ! '. n ._....l'OOO..~
'1'11 ... -. JIIIIod7 Y. I J No I[ J If JII, _ ~ t'
.
....
t1
........... ....... . ....~-_.....-. .. .........--- ,. b.. . _.'
-......-.. .................................. 'l ..............., ,..... ..........
. '" ..........
..
..".. A.-"'"
.
..... .
,J
~~
jlPu:' flOU, f'8!jftt lIafta,er
1lItc:
,.
.
...tlak. m.y.l~.ftt ~Plny
frill..... _ II !~. "-,
~ J$/?~ .
'.
ys." I
CueNo.~,
IJI."TEIlDEPARTMENT.u. COMMENT SHEETS
ENGINEERING DIVISION
L pninll!e
,
n.
~~lo.'"
A. IJ the J"'Ojeclslle 1rid'lin . ll00d ,lain, J10.
Jf 10. lCale wbic:II PEMA FIoodWI)' Fnqocrq 8ouncIary. ""'" .
.. Whar is Ihe loc:Ilion ad description oralain& 011 aI...... rrnl';'''~''- -.e .Ii:S-'Y
~~~ ....,Pl Ct'rY~...~~ "-...Iv.&I.......... .....1........
C. Are die)' adequlle to aerve Ihe project7 Vo.
If not. ,lease explain men)'. B"~'-- V-' '''1:. _L.I&J,A, "- --...... ....~ "",u..
~ 1fI1T~-'(~"" 14111~ 'PYt'.IA11L - -- .......,.,. "'-'.I.-c _
D. What is the location and description or aiItin. ofI'-w ......e.,.,.nldr" 3"1 .i"..... ~
,.~JJ..,,,.,} t!I.._ ~~!:. '.II.. lv_A' II '&'~.. A_ fCl.tr ,.~.._.,
, ~
E. Are the)' adequlle to aerve the project7 Io/D. '.
If not. please explain men)'. 'p''-I_''''''L.. 1~_.'-.~rA_ u,,'" - ..'-.-k..)'
-
IN ~ ~"" "......,..,_, A&J~ ...... ~ ''''''''1It. ~A1C. ~~ -".' -. '-,,rr-
I"Y -'_t...M.L .
1ranmmllinn AIJ NA~J,. 16.0"'- ~ <f'ttl! TfJI#',.,c. .n,o't' *'...., ~ --w'lf,
SPA ~'R..w/u'-. ~'IM!l>("" /tlc~lft. "".....WIC.A r~"~"'fIIrM
A. What roads provide primary access to die projea7 ~ ~
.am At:
.. What is Ihe atimllld DUmber or"'WI)' aIIO alp to .. _ I~"'''' JnJecI (per ~,,*),
Co
WIw are die Avenp DaD)' 1'nfI'k (AJ).T.) -..,
after projcc:l...,WOII'
Inet Name
-OIl ...~ _adI Wan-'
-.ran
,.,.,
.
Do all)' or 1hcIe 901_. I .. DIy's 1.ftIJ4 S.m. (LO.I.) -C- ... AM
woJume' Jf,ea. pJeullpICify.
~
_. .___ .----.-........_...~ .....,."taJII ""_lSl
71"
/J-'r? 7
",2
.
.
Y$ -5'f I
CaseNo.~
Jf the A.O.T. or LO.s. -C' desil" yoJume iluntnoWII .. DOlIppUcabJe. ftp1ai.n llrien)'.
. D. Ale die primat)' accusl'Dlds ldeqlllle to ICM Ibe projr.cl?
If not. pJeasc explain llrieny.
E. Would die project awe IInICClIp&&bk LeYI1s of Service (LOS) ..... J~ IIdjIcenlIO
01' in the Ykinity or Ihe project ahe?
Jf so. identif)': Location
Cumulative LO.s.
F. Is the proposed project I -_.e projr.cl- 8Ilder Ihe Conpllion NInapment PIopam? (An
equivalent or 2400 or IIlOI'& avm.e daD)' YChicJe aips or 200 or IIIDrC pcak-boar YChic1e
trips). If yes. I Traff"ac Impact Analysis ('IlA) wW lie nquired.' .1bII .. die TlA wiD
have to demoMfate that the project wW Dot aute III anmhJa.~ advme impact. or that
all related nffic impacu are Dot miti.aw5 to I level or DOII-aJplfIcance.
Yes No
The foUowin. questions apply if I Traff"ac Impact Analysis is DOl nqulrtd.
O. Is D'lffic miti.ation required to ndllCl nlrlC Impacts IhIl wiD _uh from lmpJemIIIwion of
the proposed project? Yes No
If yes. please describe.
H. Is Ihe project ~ wIIh Ibe atIIria 1I&I"1i-"" ID.. DIf'. n........ ... ..... Plan,
0enIn1 Plan 'lnff'ac" --." aU ... __ ... p-'"c..,..... r - III)'
8Iher nJrlC ..... II::' .,,.... far If-.......)' III'" .. .., ... . .- '".,.. r-, DIed
project.
1
J,
Is I nJrac M)' nqalnd'1
Is Ibere 1ft)' dedadCII ....dIed?
If 1O,'pa.IJlIdI>'.
Yes
No
JJ--~ ?r
~
....'
~ -lL;Jnm"., ~_,,~. _la}."...,)
~
An Ihuc an)' II'Iffic-ft1ased lIolse levels impacdn.1he .. .. III ....... w"", to jDIdf)t ..
allOise analysis lie nqulred or1he IppUclnt' 'ILl........ I. AtJ ~UM""UIl'lo... ~ ........ ~
6~ .N~/." ~i(l '1$1. WI" .6.. ~,..P .
~
How adIlOlid IIld liquid (Iewer) .... wID .. _ ad III" ra-. r r t.......fI
Io1id Z~ ~'IJJ!M. ~. -.V AaM.II ~~ ..,,-.~~_u_. ~~.
1JqlII4~l)~'l0l6_ ~'''''~~A.B--''-'''''.
WIllI.. .. T 1- IIld ... "-w..a ..... . .... _l ...... *, .
~WU.!1[ I.J-........... -.._~'-.v ,..,u ~ ~~ "'J;."~ry ....
, I .
wulr. IAJ ~1. t--n.......a. u.r ... ........., ,.. IC ..& ... ~~ ~~ ,AI.. ,....... ~ .... J .... ~..~ uA.' ...
.
\!!~~:s:~~=...
.,,() .\\"J\ r.....' ~,~~"--__IIl:. ~~~ om ~ T"'I_A.: /JMI:IMJ. -VW
0/ 'Pt.....IiIJ. MJ,., ~ M4rtJlr,r"..~wrur~W'" R.wJ Mu.. -= --rJ--. j'?/7 J
. .
m.
IV.
v.
VL
,
Ys -9f l
CueNo.~
K. Jllflere 811)' _t wicknlnl nqun41
Iho. please ~cif>'.
L An there an)' ocher IlI'CCl improYIIIICIIIS nquJnd'1
If 10, pleue spedf)' the pnrnJ UIUft of.. "'Mf ........1 AllIN,
M. WilIlhe poje.cl and nWrd public Imj'lj)~ rav.1Ik _wllCtlllY tIIIffic ...... for
uisdn, CIOl'Iditions 8IId future 1luDd0Ul Gencra1 PJan --'~., (PIeue raVyldt a ~f
elplanllion).
~
A. Are Iflere In)' anticipated Idvr:rse poI&dIniW condiziCll\S IlII the-projecl*' Jilol"""..u. .
B. If yes. apedfy these conditions. .J:J./4. .
C. Is I Soils Repon necessary' Y6!;" Etrl!!.-nAlI:. f;",,~ ~~.An:. AAIJ~- 1J~'f2Z)
NJtJ/1IIl. AM&o&J:ln> ~ IIJ"'-J.J~ "nfE A V'&
~fJ./A. ~~~v~ ...,.rl J7'~TMt ~'ST'I~,
~~I)~. .
A. '\\'hat is the IVUl,e nINJ'Ilalope of die aile'
B. What is the mWmum ftINJ'II slope of die lite'
.
Y.$ -9f I
CueNo.~
VD. 1llTional Pollutant pi5ch~e ~minltion SYltem ~S) Sttmnwater llmlhements
WiD Ihe applicant be I14Wred 10 ftIe a Nodce oflnllnt wIIh Ihe Stale W..R"oar=a CDnlrOlBoard
lor ODftJIIe under 1ft NPnES SlClmIwarll Pamlt? :Ie ~.
.11 ,..1pIdfy which NPnES JCftllt(s) Md apJain why III tm>ES pamIt II aqa.d.4b1 ~~O!!
. .'P''''lArr"", ~u\J__. '2),~,u"<=:'~ ~,,"~"'1'\"104 &~_^"-,
~~""a1""'~c ~~,.,.. Ie ~'.J'f"" ..,..-,~ ~ ..,,,. ~~-C'
#JILL'" 7.),..-r.... ,., ~ __""~c.'-.~ ~-~ -1iIIId-1 ~'&."'-IC..
~ D-=.A LA.~'''. ".AAAAAft&.' _... J..1 61= ~'~I~.E.l"- ~ e .
WiD a Slonn Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) bel*lldnd for Ihc .......-d pmject7
~ Yes No
Additional commenu 1./,>&." .
VD. JtemlTks
,Jwe Identify and discuss any ftmIinin. plIICNiIJ Idvme 1mpacu.1IIldpr1an ....... . oIher
..ues. ~ ~1-,t:..Aa.rr- "'*I" - ~"...~ ..Scr--..... ~ ~~I~""'." u "'tII'.l~
~ P/Mkl'~ JU~Jh/F"""~.
.
.
.
.. A ....r-.
-.
:
ly..-:?tJ
~
.iJ.thf
..
1IfIlCJ\J~ -.uullllOw.
-I=- ~,IalJIIl.-.--l
...' .
,
,
.
Case No. IS.q~,I'l
mE DEPARTME"'''
A. Wbal illht dislance 10 the DIarut 1Ift1lldon'1 ~ willi II ., Pin PIt ~A"1Idmared
aactionlimt, ~D sl. (" ~ft'\\n. ~n,.J.ion +ilN\o
-
.
.
I. Will the Pirc Dcp~ lie alIJe 10 rvddt III IdequIe Iim1 ".. r -t- fDr Ibe
poposed facUit)' wilhout III iIlcnut III ~ . r..DDMJ7 ~.s
C. Jlemarks 1..1 CA.' of
.
!;J!(j1f>/11 ':iN
f' Marshal '
-P'!:JO/f/'1
..
.
.
. .
. .
.
.'
~ /%~YI
"
"
,
CueNo.~
'ARKS ~'D RECREATION DEPARTME"'T
:1.
A.
II projel::l' IUbjeel to Parb and 1l1-"10ll11uuh~ ...._~, ...::!itS.
If 110&, ,lI&se a,1a1n.
Co
How 8lII\Y ICI'II or put1and .. --.~ ID __ fle r-, m ~ JI'Oject1
~ ~ f-~~ .,) ~~ kpilf6C1C. CJC'~\'"
ItJt aiIdn. Mi&hbClrtlood _ ~ ,.u .. fie JI'OjIc:& 11 ,.... . ~ the
fOPu1Izion lDcnu, IU1IJdna Irarm 6b JI'Oject' . .
Nciahboltlood ~
Comm\Wr)' Parks tl ().
If not, 1ft parkland cle4ic:alions or orhcllllitiillion ..",y0M4 . JIII'I or the JI'Oje.clldeqllue
10 IeNC Ibc poplllalion Increasc'
Nci,hborbood '\'~S"
Commw1ily Parks ~ t:'S .
To meet Cit)' nqlliJancnts, w.111app1iclnt lie nqlllrad 10:
Providc land'! y~
PI)' a fee'! y;r.
Remarks:
D.
E.
F.
.
. .
."
foF: ~!i't\~
fIrb 1M 'w-~on Dnc&ar. L,411 -.olw
.,.41! .~'1-
..
~
M J~~ Sd--
.... ,
.
. .
Cue No,.JS.Cl4./Cj
LANDSCAPEPLA"""'NG
A. J)oeslhe projecl Iff'c.ct IWiVl ,111\1 communities' ~
1110, ,Jeue Idcndf)' wIt.icII CIIlIIII'IIlJII.
Wi1Ilhe project require _VI pJandna' (P...lIIIcri.)~~
.
...
'kase Identify In)' impclftlftl .llIJhl)' YIaDl1t .molcJ-o . .IiI!J' - . .. JIOjeel.
~
Whll landscapin, condillons (if In)') wDlIIe aquInd far ..... .ntolAao'
.
C. Of' the lOW ~. to lie devcl0pe4. how IDIlch, Md wllich ... .. "'.1, I ctt(.f 10 lie aptanwl
Md require lupplemenw wllerin" (pJwe ducribc).
E. An theft In)' odIcr landscape nquL...lMIU . _It;ptl_ ,. .. Jl'Djecl' ~
. .
. .
.
VI
..
.
.u5 /grc?}
..
t
"Ot1"~Nr: rOIf",
~Z: .Jlnuary 18, 1994
"..n z.u.oii/ .,,11"1"g' .o"d;,;~
~ohn ~1pp1tt, ~g1n..r1ng IZ1~' only}
CHit ....an.on, Zn;1n..r1ng IZ1~ only}
.al Ito..nb.rg, Zng1n..r1ng IZZIt only}
Ito;.r ~ao".t, ~;1n..r1ng IZ6/J, ZZIt/J}
It.tch.rd Itudol~, Ant C1ty Attorn.y IDra~t .., Dec . ZZ~}
Carol Gov., ,Jre Depart..nt. '.
..rty 6chm1IJt, '.rk. . It.cr..Uon . .
CrJ.. I'r.v.nUon, l'oHc. Depart..nt ,,,.3. ~10."atJo}
'CUrrant I'Jann1ng
Du.n. ..~~.J, .AtJvanc. I'Jann1n;
.ob ..nn.tt, CJty ~ntJ.c.pe Arch1t.ct
.ob ~1t.r, I'Jann1n; DJr.ctor
ChuJa V1.t. ZJ...nCary .chool D1.tr1ct, ..t. .h"r.on
_ ..,..t....t.r Vn10n N... D1.tr1ct, 1'01ll .Jlv. 11. , .11t}
, ".ur..n Ito.b.r, ~1brary (71n.l .11t) .
I , ~AFCO (ZS/Dr./t Z11t - It annex.t10n l. lnvolv.tJ)
i . , Oth.r
,l-~'~
~ ~. Doug Reid
I
.
.
I
I
.
J:nvJroJ.2ll.nt.l .."Jon
.rJ~ZC'l': AppHc.Uon ~or In1U.l .tuIJy In--U:,1i'TA- '4B /IJQ OliO J
Ch.ckpr1nt Dratt Z11t IJO day.} 1.11t- ".- IIJQ J
It.v1.... 01 . Dralt .Z~ I.ZIt- IT.- IDP. J
It.vJ.... 01 .nvJronl/l.ntaJ It.vJ.,, It. cord tTe- J:1Ut- J
It.vJ.,, 01 Dralt .a; Dec tn- ITA- IIJQ- J
.
.
I'lla I'l'oj." ~lIdd. o~, An ...n_nt to tll. ElltL.,. I,,"nl lentr.l
Dev.lopment Plln .nd Sectionll Arel Pl.n -"icll .ould relult tn:
1. The trlnsf.r of unitl ~thin the exiltinl tGundlriel of E.lt
L.... lre.n. to refin. densities ~tII ftO Mt tncre... tll the
ex1ltinl propolIl denl1" .nd .
. t. ThI Iddition of 22.7 IC"I io hIU,', I,,"nl ...l.....nt ~tll
III Idditionll t7 Mll1111 units. .
.
1'1.... revJ." tIl. dow..nt In
.y, 02.0~ .94 .
couut., .' ;:t ~~/;- e -'OI"t-ll~ -
IB--%~ -4.~)<- 'I.~
&0 .. allY _lIU J'OU A.v.
\
.OV'!'~Nt: rOlUtf
~A!1'Z I oJlnul ry 18. 1994
to: ~.n ~r'on, 'u1Jd1ni , 'ou,1ni .
John ~1ppjtt, Zng1n.er1ng (ZIIt onJy)
C1111 6wan.on, Zng1neer1ng (Zllt only)
Bal ~o.enberg, ZngJneerJng (Ellt only)
~oger ~aou.t, Zng1n.erJng (lS/', Zllt/Z)
ItJehard ltudoJt, Allt CJty Attorn.y (~ra/t .., he , ZIIt)
Carol Gove, 'Jre Depart.ent .
Harty SchmJdt, 'ark. , ~ecreat1on
CrJ.e 'reventJon, 'olJe. Depart.ent (H.3. ~Jo.dado)
~rnnt 'lann1ng' -
'~ane .azzel, Advance 'lannJng
'ob Sennett, CJty ~and.cape ArehJt.et
'ob L41ter, ,1annJng D1rector
Chula V1.ta Elementary School DJ.trJet, ~at. Shur.on
_ Swe.twater UnJon N,S. ~1.trJet, rom SJlv. (IS' ZIR)
Hlureen Roeber, ~1brary (F1nal ZIR) :
~AFCO (IS/Dralt E1R - 11 .nnexat10n J. Jnvolv.d)
Dther
'ROM:
DOUQ Reid
~nvJron..nt.J s.et10n
SU.JZC1': AppHeat10n lor InJU.l Study (zs- 94-1i1'A-,,648 IDQ olin J
Ch.ckprJnt Dralt ZIR (ZO day.) (Zllt- ".- IDQ )
RevJ.... 01 . ~r.lt Z11t (Zllt- ,"- I~P. )
It.vJ.... 01 ZnvJrenJ.ent.l ltevJ.... It. cord ('C- .M- )
ltevJe... 01 ~r.lt ..g Dee (lS- I'A- IDQ- J
.
.
I'll. 'rej.ct eond.t. 0/, An a.n_nt to the EastLalt. 'Ntnl lint,..,
Development Plan and S.ctfonll Arta Plan whfch would relult tn:
1. The t,.ansfer of unfts within the .xhtinll Munde,.f.s of Ellt
Lake ,,.tens to reffnt densfti.s with no lilt tncrtas. tn the
'Xfltfnll proposal d.nsf~ Ind
i. The addition of 12.7 acrts to EastLalt. INtns ..,.l....nt with
an addftional '7 "ellfnll units.
~
,J.... nv1.'" the do~.ent end to,.",.rd to .. eny ....nt. you A.v.
by, 02-01-94 .
eoo...nt" if""T"fTf "".cu.lc. -'lD ~ .~eM&~'
t ~~ ~_O"'f (p~ n~~ ~~ .0
12r~~
CQ4~
JfOU'rING FORM
~A'/'Z: .January 18. 1994
to: ..n ~r.on, .u11'1ng , Nou.1ng
John ~1ppJtt, ~ngJn.trJng (EIR only)
CJ1tt .wen.on, ~ngJn.trJng (EIR onJy)
MeJ ~o..nbtrg, EngJn..r1ng (EIR only)
Mog.r ~eou.t, ~ngJn..rJng (ISI', EIR/I)
MJehar' ~udoJt, Aut CHy Attorn.y (~rett II., lIee , EIR)
Carol Gov., 'Jr. IMpart.tnt .
"arty SehmJdt, 'erk. , ~.cr.etJon
cd.t 'r.v.nt,ton, 'oHe. IMpart.tnt (II.J. ~Jrn'a'o)
eurr.nt 'Jann,tng
~uant lazztl, Advanc. 'JannJng
.Qtlo ..Ilnen, ~.l~y"""",,,,__ ......,..H~t,
)ob ~,t t.r, 'J annJng I>~...ctor --.. 0- .
ChuJa VJ.ta EJ.mantary SchooJ ~J.tr1et, .et. Shur.on
_ Sw.ttwattr UnJon H.S. DJ.trJet, ~om SJJv. (IS' EIR)
Mauretn Rotbtr, L,tbrary ('1naJ EIR)
LATCO (IS/Draft EIR - It anneK.tJon J. .nvolv.d)
Other
'ROM:
Doug Reid
rnvJron..ntel ..ctJon
SU.,ZC'l': AppJ,teat,ton tor In,ttJeJ Stu'y (IS- g4.1~FA-~/DQ ft~n )
Ch.ckpr1nt Dratt EIR (10 'ay.) (ElIl.-_".- IDQ ,
~.v1.'" ot . Dratt EIR (ElIl.- ".- ,~p. J
~ev1.w ot Env,tronm.ntal ~.v1.w ~.cor' (Fe- ZAR- J
Mev,t.w ot ~r.tt M.g ~.c (IS- ,'A- IDQ- J
.
.
I'll. ho:J.et cond.t. ot: An a..ndllllnt to th, Eutlat, '....ns len,ral
Dev,lopment Plan and S'ctional Arta Plan which would result tn: .
1. The transf,r of unfts within th, 'lilting boundarf'l of East
Lat, Gr.ens to reffne d.nsftits wfth no net tncrealt in the
'lfsting proposal d.nsfty and .
i. Th. addition of 22.7 acrts to Ealtlat. 're.nl ..vtlopllnt with
an additfonal .7 dwelling unfts.
'1.... r.v1.... tll. docu.tnt .n' tortlard to .. any co...nt. you ".v.
.y. 02.01.94 .
_"0' - ~ rf .vw /3'-n
CHUl.A VISTA POUCE DEPAJl'J'MEm'
. CRIME PREVENTION UNIT
P~AN IlEVIEW RECOMMENDATIONS
.. .,-
. ... .
. __'w .. '0:.
... -.
DAn:: 1-.d~ 4, /qq4.
'10: ~~!J Q.a.ul!.-o P~nn~,"",
VIA: OJ~ ~. -P~....... "'"F..... i~n/.
FROM: )1'l~~ ~, Se...,.s
PR01ECT: "r::::> 'iJ./-/9 O~,J. 'f,-:t"L...Ik.e)J..,~ J. ~....t
~. . q
~
_ '!be Crime Prevention tJnit does not have Ill)' eommcDta ..prdiDa 1bis pr'Ojeet 1l1bis lime.
_ Information on the project., or within &he plans. docs DOt provide IDllqh dIWllD permit
crime prevention anal)'sis.
.1SL- Please forward the follov.inalnfomwion to dle Crime p,.VlDtiCll tJDlt wIleD available.
~ EJevations
-
Floor Plans
L Llndsclpf and Ulhtina Plans
~ Site Development Plans
o....rncnta: /(.J Vt\..L 8"'.I.u~-;:f. -7r';"'L ~ A6JJ,~ ~AUVfY..u
rt.J.I-:L.J ~ WooL G~.lfL Ptk-.-J. a... ~/IVJ: ~
~ ~ -1. (.., t'.,.) ~
to
cc: BraotoYer. SCA
~ /Y~8?
DATE:
TO:
nOM:
I1JIJECT: .
MEMORANDUM
Fcbl\llJ)' I, 1994
Doug Reid
Ez1YiroDmental Review CoordIDator
Duane E. R.'"~jtSl&
Principal Plamler
initial Study for EutLake Greens GDP/SPA AmeDdment ~94-19)
The Advance Planning DivIsion appreciates the oppommIt)' 10 "-'""eDt CIII the proposed
project identified above. From an clMrODmental anaJ)'siIltaDdpoiDt jt appears that the
EulIAke Greens ElR and Addendum nffIclently addrcand the prc..-ed dCDsJt)' 1ranSfers
within Eutl..ake Greens. The proposed transfer of units are occuniD& 1mder the 1IIDbreUa
of the orJaInally.apprOYed Eutl..ake Greens SPA and TentatM Map (2,'774 UDlts). therefore,
unless there arc lisnJfic:ant ahifts in unit locations It would appear that the oripW EIR
adequately addresses the transfers.
It mould not be forgotten, however, that u a CIODdltion of appto-.-al of a receDt GP
ameDdment 10 Parcel 26 of the Greens (GPA.93-04). the Oty OnmcD Ie enacted the
affordable housing requirement for the Greens (deferred with the Tentative Map approval)
and directed ad to work with a task force 10 develop ,..--datlca by July of this JCIr
OD how to handle the low and moderate mcome 1Io\lliDa withiD thfa project. 'I1ala direedon
from CouncD IDc1uded the consideration of any dcDSf1)' 1I'IDIfen.err .~ 10 achiew the
Ilousina requirement. It does Dot appear that the J>>~ltd dCDaity traIIIIen arc lIplfic:ant
aoup to impact the task force dfona. but De\uthtlen.1bae dfana IbouJd be CDIIIidcred
prior 10 approvma ID)' SPA .--.4"'CDL
'he 97l1111ts 10 be UDflIId ad added 10 the ar- .... aaJy ....1IIII!JIed at 'a 0CDeral
PJaD level (withJD the Ota)' Ranch r.... EIR) ad IlOt at the detahlflfflIJwIth a GDP
DdIor SPA. 'ibis __ to be IIbD tDto -~tiCIII -- IiIqzIDa poIaItial
...L~ impaeta. AdditioIIalIy, proJect.JeveJ &DIJ)U __10 be _eLated with the
1'Mt"'1IIIity pa.~ DMalon of the pa....... DeputmeDt (0aIy '.-'0 SPA TIuD) . the
... rllaDd _ ad ~ IDteJfacc with But Oruac A.... ad .~~.the ~t
Otay Ranch.
CIC: Xen Lee
Steve Grif6n
Amy Wolfe
~. ~)
/1D )g-~~r
1ol.IolORANIl'01ol
.ebruary 1, lU4
.u. . YI-5J1
nOM:
S~.1ECT :
I)oug Reil:!, ~virODlllental Coor&1iDator
Clifforl:! 1.. Iwanson, Ileputy ~lic Works I)inctor)//("
City ~gineer ,
Barolc:! Rosenberg, City Traffic Ingin..~
Eastlake Greens General Ilevelcpment aDd Sectional Area
Plans Amendment
'10:
VIA:
In response to your concern regarc:!ing our transportation cCIIIIIlent in
the suklject initial nuc:!y application, the follOwing paragraph
should be added to Section VII of tbe application.
Previous traffic .tudies have .hown that the circulation
system plan prior to the conltruction of IR125 does not
bave sufficient capacity to ebsorb ac:!c:!itional trips
beyonc:! those trips accountec:! for in tbe approved ..ps
incluc:!ing the approved lastlake Greens. 'J'bus tbe
lastlake Greens proposed expanc:!ec:! development >>roject
will have to be limiuc:! to the nwnber of trip. idantiUec:!
in the approvec:! project IIR. traffic .tudy. Bowever, the
applicant may wish to perform a 8Upplemental trafUc
.tuc:!y to examine po..ibilities of expanding the City'.
circulation .ystem Ce.i. exten.ion of I. Orange Avenue
htween I-80S and ...tlake Greensl to provide the needec:!
capacity. A reference to tbe City'. iDterim 'R-125
Unancial .tuc:!y (JINTB 8tudyl and i~rO'W-..nt .cheduUng
are a critical element of the .tudy.
DO: rb
cc: . &oger I)awn, .enior Ci,,11 ~giDeer
...,-,- \tuPnC\r- . lAD)
$ /2'/3'1
,
MEMOR.ANDUM
Flbruary 21, 1994
File II YS.5S 1
TO: . Doua Reid, EDviroDmmw CoorcIiDator ,
VIA: Clifi'ord L, Swanson, Deputy Public Worts Directorl. V
City EDlineer r
FROM: 'Harold Rosenbera. Traffic EDJino/ . .
SUBJECT: Eastlake Greens GDP/SPA Amelldment Traffic SlUdy (1S-93~ "'~
:
I have reviewed the attached traffic impact repon by thblZl Systems daIed February II, 1994
aDd fmd it to be acceptable, The Dew trips from the added 97 amitl to the Eutlake Greens
Ipproved units of 2774 have DO siJlilliC&Dt impact OD the City's circulatiOD 1)'IIem,
ZAO:dv
Att.,.h"'eDt
.
.. .,DGI... a.Atr...'\WW"..t1l1f~O
.'
~ /J-,--'}CJ
,
,
URBAN SYSTEMS itJSOCL4TES, INC.
A -.~~ .IF-G.... r~'~"" _ J
c:a:..l.&.""""'" ft)~" MID CIo\v -.rr
~ ::.:.::.: I'~:~
.,.-;.. :::.- C~'_:~:' .';~~:"
:--,.: ....~:.:::. ,,~-. -.r.';':'"r
. ... _' _'L:
ISS4 FD 22 AM t 4S
February 18, 1194
'.
Mr. Hal Rosenberg
CIty Traffic engineer
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
276 Fourlh Avenue
Chula VIsta. CA 82010
Dear Hal:
Urban Systems Associates, Inc. (Urban Systems) was retained by Eutlake Development to
evaluate possible Impacts from the development of additional dMlling unlta In .... Ealtlake
Greens GOP/SPA Amendment. The Eastlak. GrHns GDP/SPA Ary\endrnent proposu an
Increase of 17 dwelling units from 2.774 DU to 2.871 DU. . .
'1 _.eet ~eneration
The development of 97 additional dwtlling unlta wiD ruult In the toIIowIng peak hour and dally
trip generation.
1M I'IAI< ... I'IAI<
WE lIftINIlTY ~TlON Il1f
"'TE /lift 1M k'OUf IN:ClUT """ ... IN:ClUT IN:ClUT
..uT ..uT
1!'tlU 17 OJ 1Cl1DU 170 '" ,. .. 11:t1 1ft If ,. .,.
.
.
As can be oIlItrved, .... 87 additional unItI wID r8IUIlln 87 PM pMk hour "PI. or the 87 PM
peak hour .., 18 art Inbound and 28 outboUnd to .... proJect. ..... NI. pMk would have '78
additional paak hour .. with 11 InboUnd and 12 0UIb0und duItng .... pMk. .
. '.
.
. .
A ...me IIulI)' tor KaI.. ttotplfa! (Eadak. I SPA ArMndIMId by.IHK Aln.,aa'II' Dl
. ..... Kalter HoIpIIaI hfftc IIUdy ....lrD .. ... Netnt
anaIpIl of ~.rIm conditions tor eut.m ChuIa VIIta (eat of 1-105). ........ a _.LII
r ~ions MIumtd the "~ proJtdl" .....1 of .....bpmlflt b... ....ertrn MaIyIII. 1M
~....,proYld projlct" "'e' of deVelopment ... .-Id on .. PInal ....em ChuIa VIata .
Transportation Phulng Plan Updat' prepared by WIJdan AllllclM.. (1181).
"
. ~ /8"/9/
. "'''111'17
IAr. #MJ Rotenberg
~bflJary fl. 7194
~ SyItemt AN~ciId... Inc.
In the InaI report tor KaIser HoIpttaJ elated AprIl 20. 1192. (peg. "1). '" ~ prOject
dtveJopment ecenario wiD result In approxlmat.1y 183,230 additional cIIJIy _ In Eut.m Chula
VIsta. The Malysls h:ludtd trIpa generated by 2.774 unItIln '" EutIIk. Greens project.
Using '" "proved projtctse oondltion as ." ... hpIcts torn '" KMtr HoIpItaI were
evaluated. Attachment 1 8hoWI1M NlJPM peal( hour InttrNClion ttv.I of .1NIet tom the
Kalllr HoIpItaI traffic analysis. . .
Aa Ihown In Attachment 1. aIIlnttrNClions ""lorlCUted 10 operaIt" a level or..rke-o"
or bett.r. Kall1r Hospltallrnpacts 10 1M Int.....ctIon or OIay Lak.. .. F........ PMtway (the
crtticaIlnttrMCtlon tor the Kall1r Project) tor '" NlJPM peak rMUIta In a level of MNIce -CO
10 eo". Int.rNctIon delay was 5.2 aeconcls tor the NI. peak and 5." eecondIln '" PM peal<
at this location. The Increased d'lay at thillocatlon wu due 10 more I\an 14.000 dally trips
tom the Kllser project being added to the but oonclltlons.
The KaIser analysis ooncludts that the lntel'HCllon delay" OIay Lak.. bd and Eutlake
Parkway II 25.8 HCOnds In the NI. peak and 29.8 In the PM peak which hnIIat.. 10 . level
of ..rvlce O. It Ihould be noted that the Intel'HCllon delay" 0Iay .... Road and EutIak.
Parkway could be Incr.ued as much as 10 ItCOnds and dB rernIIn .. allYel or MrvIct eo".
p
In order 10 determine possIble Impacts tom the proPOltd SPA ....-.ndmtnt, proJtc:t traffic wu
added 10 '" Intersection analysIs dl~ '"ed abov.. tor '" comput.r
Intel'ltctlon anaIyals remalned the urnt. H Ihown on Attachment I. '" ...uItIng level of
MMcllncluding projtct nffic remalned -0" tor both the NI. and PM ....."M A oompMIon of ,
Attachment 1 and a ahowI that with proJect traffic '" Intnlctlon cItIIy hnutd only 1.5
ItCOndlln '" NI. peak and 2.11tCOnds In'" PM peak. 1hII dNrty lndICfI-ht .... Spa
Amendment tor Interim (worst cu.) ClOndltlona II not lleely 10 cnate hpaCII which WDUId requlr.
mitigation or chang. 1M IIvtI of MrvIct .. F.....It. Parkway and Otay ..... RoId.
, .
In .sdItIon. politi. tnpIeII tom '" propo." SPA .lIrA.. ... -"tnd tDr '"
tlttrHCllon or EutIIk. ParIcway and Fenton 8...M. ..... IlOnCIIIIonI b... .....=tIon
anaIyIII wn obtained torn '" 8crIppI QInIc Tlodic ...,.,.. tIDd MMlh 10. '183. For'"
but oondIIonI. 8Ignal liming WIt opIirnIztd which fllufting In a'" oil I MDt V tDr'" P.M.
. or In IntIrMctIon cItIIy of ..'7 II c:OoldI .... Atta~ '). ' ..
, .
ProjIcl nile WIt lien IIddtd 10 iii .... aoncIItIonI. iii... ___ b lie OOfI4M'r
tlttrMCllon IftIttaIt rerMlned.... urne. ,. ahown on AtlaohrMnt.. lie fll-~ lwei of
, MMcllndudlng proJect '1RIc remained V. Intatllctlon cItIIy IlhIngtd ontt 0,4 IIClOoldIIo
17.1. 1hII ClIurty IhoWI that .... SPA .-ndmlnt tDr .... oondItionIlI not Ikely 10 cnatt
l'npIctI which would requlr. mitigation. AS buId out or wIIh an Irdtrtm ,. or wIlh an Orange
Avenue ClOMICIIon, Spa Amtndrntnt Impacta WDUkI be tMn ....- N-'-' .... WDnlcS be
muIIIpI. 8COtI1 routtI.
I
...
.~ /J!'~1;Z
, .. --n",
,. HW FfONnberg
t_JfUat)' 18, ,g94
IJIban BpI."., AuCld.,.s, Inc.
laSed on the information dlscuutcl above, Impacts from the development of 17 ~Itional units
appear to have m1nlrnallmpacta on the circulation 8YSt.m. W. therefor 8Ugoeat I\at no futther
..affic anaIyIIs II nec.".'Y. . .
'. .
PJus. call us If you have any questions .-garding th. ~ dIIel.Ttcf above. .
Sincer.Iy,
/"
~
,
.'
APSITRS:vks
Attschments
cc: Bruce Sloan
Cliff Swanson
Doug Reid
,
. .
. .'
~
)
qd 1?,73
" --Ift.~f
eo.
ATTACHMI:NT t
INTERIM (pRE SR-125) INTERSECTION PEAK HOUR ANALYSIS
FOR KAISER HOSPITAL
.... ... ~...
..._ II...._'~ IJlI__ _ ..vA ...!Eo"'........ _..~ .___...._ __.... ;:."
".-..uIl."'fUn ~ SUllMaal' CAlI PEA. .,.,.. Mr._~F.(:'_ PF.__MANCf: ~A_\' .... PFoAK ...,
-- --
... r- r.~ ~ '""" I. ~- ~-
, ~ 1 .... ...., ...--~ ...., I h Ih.. -, I"'~ ...
-- -- L..... ~~ LOSUt -- -- ....,....... Lott. -.... LO,..I
L - ---. III . .02 . .. -- ....- If" . If" .
L -- ....- .. c ... e I. ....... ....- ".. . ".. D
.. -- --- .., C In e I. ........ --.... ".. C 10' e
.. -- -- II-" C IU e I. -.- -- .. '''' . JI.I .
.. -- ......- IU e "" e J. ........ -...- .'" e .'" e
.. -.- ....- II. . IU . .. 0- ..... - I,.. C IU e
I. -.- ....- n. . 'u . .. -- ......- .. . .... .
L -.- --- .... . HI . L -- --- ".I . ,.. .
.. -.- -... II' e .. e .. -- -.... .. . .U D
--.- -- ... . ... . .. -- -- .... e ... e
It _._ -...- .. . .. . II. .,... -...- ... e tU It
II. _._ -... - - IL .!..e ......c-_
- "' e n, e _A_ II.J It II.J It
a__ - . r - .. e ft.l e 11.._ -- II. It ... e
. jA _ o. . - ...-. .. It 'u It N. 111.....-41- T . - ......- a, c tu e
II. -.. AT . - ....- .. . .u . II. ~c.,.'" ....- .... . ..., .
.. T T . - -- ,. . u . ..._c-_ - It. . H. .
".T . ... _r -- II' e ... It If. ......c.,..... 0."""- .- ... . It.' .
. jA _ 't. ... -... .... e .... e .. _c-_ -.... ft' e .u .
~..., .-" . - . - -.. .... . H.' . . _c-_ _c-_ .,.. It .. e
. jA _ ~ 't . ... -...- .. c ... e II. _c-_ -.-- It.l . H' .
a ......_ -- IU . 11.1 . II. .......... -- IU . HI .
a. ......_ -- . 11. ....w..... ........ hIMI",
.. ..- - 0 . 13 . - . . 8 .
- r - - .. It . .. --- --... .. c .
. -
a _-... ....-- H.__ ---
. '.. 0 .u . -- . . at .
a- t ......v - 11.- M__ ---
'.. 0 0 tI. . -- . . .. .
...." - -- .rJ . ... . .. -...... -- II . ,. a
.. ...-- ~ -- . '1.1 . If. _..._ -- II' . II' .
a.__ ....... .. e ..1 e a__ ....- .. . .. .
.._- .--. .. e ... e a__ .....- fl.. . ... .
--- - - T ... .. C .. e a__ ---- tt.t C a. D
....L 1lL..' ". -....... u. _ - ....
"- I ......-- - -- ........- - T - ........"..
~ DrOlo.__-" __-\:i:---__..
,~_.._a -. .- ~
~ · - - -.. - - ..alm1IC..1I .....~...
"-.... .-... ......-.....-, -......--..-
.......... :::"""7" A.,....;.~ r - ;- ~.::=ce=.;.._-,...
... ...-
.. .....
--...
.._ Jll"'__
--......
.....-
FA$1Lf~ 8.~c.trJ
OOlf!8511
.... L ....... . _ ....... - - _ ........
I. .........._....... - .................."..
0,..0.---" L...__...____.--..
........_0.
o .- - ..................--... - ..........
--.. . ......._..._....,-......__..~-
--. ._...._....~-....-..-...._-,...
_h-.. ..................d __.......deeO"-lJ.
... ...-
M
URl1AN SYSTEMS
-
tt
o
~
U).
-
CJ)
>-
..J
<
z~
<0
zw
0'"
i=O
()a:
"'W~
. '/) Q
'a:w
!wcn
(,)~o
C~~
~_O
Clt)a:
C\/~
-
d:~
CJ)t-
w
tt
e:
'.
...... t t .. ..
I~~~~~~l ~ !I .. I
:::::_1' i.... I;i __ __ ~~ iU
...... ..~~~~
......1 ,...... I
,.."'.......... .""'... fit ..
----.... Ii... .. ~
E .....~ i!........ :. ill
III ~~~~~~ I IIII i- · =-
.........."
...... I 11&111&111
i I ........ l ~~~~ I I ·
......
. . . . . .
.........
........
I .........
~ I . ........ ,...... I.. .. 2~
IUS. K
I 1&-."
I !II~II ,lEI:. I..-;~
E h! 'i~~~~
I: I: : ::: : Isn. I- !' ;~ j I
Iii ~~jjli liE!. I!~~~~ 11&111&11' ..............
I I IIII I ;~&I .,., I Ie. I I ~ ·
.:z:r /~~~..5
....... f
...;..;..;..;..;..:1
-...--..
i
..
..
n
.... ..
.
.
.
.
:
.
:
i
:
i
i I .....~ it........ t.
i I: I ...... ..
Ii,:::::: 1'''''1'
I.' .1 ........ it ~~~~
.1 ...... I ....
. ... ...
I II. ~l I::::::, Ge....
. I! ' I
... Ii I ....~~..
i I ai-i:;;:--' II....
G E .1 ...:: I~""I
OJ r;:,ei,
! ~ . I' .....
.!I: I' =:= I II
3 itsi;EEl I~"~""I'
II: : : : : : ; 'I r:::::. i..
. :1::::: ..... IIIII
.-...... ;....1
;- :~~::::I ,.... .....1
..t'~.....~1 ...
.. v.t-1Il . .~ I .....
EI:fe~~rl:
.,: .=~a;:e: !i~til 111=,
........
......
..... .
I""""....
..........
..........
,-..c.:.;
i" ....
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
ii ..
..
~i."
... ..
i-
.
I.:"':"'!~
Ii ..
.~ ..
i.. .. Ii-
.
t...
-
nu:u:ull !
. , ..I
..
.. ~.
I
.. I
. .
.. ~
I..
..
as-
. ..
.
.
I
.. ...
~ ~ ~
..
=
.
.
I'.u...u...u. J
................ t
'I===~.:::~=;; ;
I -
0:
.
S!:=u:u:u: ..
...............
. -.... - -...
...........
.
t
.. !-~~-.-~ll..i I.
d- ".~~~;:~~~":~.
............
I ,.
. . U
.
.
I
. .-
Ii it I
.
.
.
II...........~ l-
............ I
a iiiiiiiii:i-
I . ':
I~~~~~~~~~n ~
...........
f~~~~~~~~~~~ I
...........
~
~
I
I
I
~
~
I
I
".~..
r
~
(,)
~
o
a:.
D-
O
W
en
o
~t:i
a:w
D-~
~en
~z
a:O
~~
-
l'l CI) ~
~~<
~<>
uZ <
~<~
~ ~ ~ i I:~~~~~ I I Iii ~~ I.
~(,) ~ I ::::;-\' i ...... ,;i.. .. i~ I · .. ~
I ..... I
W W :e ~~~~~~ s'..:.:.:,.: .
I::::::' 1~~~~ i ... ~~ ~. a.
~i ~ I...... i!........ I r. . :i; ,to i i Ii !
t:! ...... I . ·
U) I~..~.~ I 1III ~
.. 4( ....... I "'11"1 , II.....~.... ~
It) W ..... I IUI 'I . Ie I
"". ( 'I I ........ ...........
-. I ...... . -"'" - -""'i' 'j
"i .......: lit. , It.alla II
! .......... I..... i ".. I to
I I ..~:::.. ...... 1% ... ~,2 II!Elli!!I! i
I "11. · ................ ·
II I. I!-." I
II II.~\\\~~ I::::: 'Ell!! :.:: .. ~ :'!!!!!!!!!
. (1IIIIIjl\ '::~: IE::::. :"':"'11 I:..:..:':' I
I
..
.. I
.
i
10:
"
. ..
i i Ii i
..
~~~~~~I r ~T
I:::::: ~ II
a... _
:::::. ~.."" ii.. .. ~~
II I:::::: Si:::: Ii ... ~2
:1 ....... i~.....
II · i-...
I ...... II i.
I I':':..':. I IIII t
~ -..---- I "SI~'SI , ".......... ..
. ..... l IUI I IE, . I
I' "...... I ....I! .. i'O:~~"~',O:
: I~~~... . ::=::11::1
I ------1 ~ T ..
1.1 .1 ..... il....lll .. I ~
..I........ II....... .. ~ili:::IIEI
111'1"... ... ...... ..O:.~':~':':.':l.
"':' .. _:e I~ s .. ............
~ :: I ...... .I
I ! aZII!I':::. !.. .. ~~ ~1!!i:Eliii'
I i!li~ill ....- I~!!!!I II ~..........
I: ;;;:;:1 I:::. -i..." t' : I
'I . , , "I . - .-
Iii ,(J HI;: I:::. I~~~~~ Ii .............
: ~ ::;: ... annUli' ','
I :E"~=I : 2
: _iu~: uu 1111," .:.. 1 I
. ..
.
.
I
,;n- Jg-~'Jb
~
~
I
I
~
I
Cr,)
~
I
,
I
EXHIBIT A
Des~tptit)n rtf Work
Alsessmcnt Dis1rict "-I
. .
The IcDml descriptiOD or work to be flmcSed by AlsessmeDt Dimtct 94-1 ClDIIIlIts or Ibt IoDowiDa:
.
1. Inet ImprovemeDts ClODSistiDa or Ifadini. but, ,mzt&, puu, 1idnIJk', ... UabtiDa aDd
~M_PiD& within thc folJowizIi ri&hts-or.way: '
a. So\Jth Gretnsvicw Drive - from CbIbbollse Drive to UDit , GIInIa (2,<<10 L.P., PUse 1).
b. South Greensvic"" Drive - from Silverado Drive to HUDtt Partway 0,<<10 L.P.. PUsc 2).
c. South Greensvicw Drivc - from Ullit 6 eDUIDCC to SiJverIdo Drive (1.920 L.P.. Phasc 3).
2. Utilitics aDd uDdcrll'ouDd improvemcDts coDSistiDa orpotablc water facllide&.1lDnII draiII facilities,
Itwcr facilities. r~laimed water facilities, e1ecaic facilities, lIIephow: facilities, pi facllities,
televisioD facilities as appropriate by applicablc ate aDd federal _NteS wi1hiD die foUowiDa rilbts-
of-way:
a. South Greensview Drive - from Clubhousc Drive to UDit' GIInIa (2,<<10 L.F.. PUse 1).
b. South Greensvicw Drivc - from Si1vtrado Drive to HUDte Partway 0.<<10 L.P.. Phasc 2).
c. South GreeDSvitw Drivc - from Ullit 6.eDUIDCC to SiJverIdo Drive (1.920 LP.. 'base 3).
.
3. DIF fuDded weet improvcmcDts ClODSistiD& or pdiDa. ItClnD draiII, Ilue. ..... an, JUUU.
.idewa1k, mtdiaDS, weetli&htiDa. I.M'~iD& aDd meet aDDUIIIIIIIIioJ widUD die foUowiD& rilbts-
of-way:
a. Hwne Parkwa)' - from ClubJloult Drive to IoadI ca.-.....' Drive (2.100 LP.. PIlast 2).
.. DIP funded ttreet and adtrJ!'OUlld .....r~ "_..I. ..-ma ., ..... ad -.n draiD
......0)...... wiIbiD tile foUowiI:l& rtptMf-wa)': '
L H1IIlII Partway . from SCladl ca "'tP to Qup A,.. (1.%70 LP.. ..... 2).
b. CJrIDac AWD\It - from H1IIlII PaoL.ll to 6e Itl()AI: . ~ 0.500 LP.. ..... 2).
.'
.
WI'C , .. _ Jilt,"
At[ /g-C)?
MBMORANDUM
Pebru.ry 23, 1U4
Pile lfumber YS 581
TO:
>>oug Rei~, anviroament.l Revie" COOrd~tor
Roger >>.oun, Senior Civil Ingineer ~J
Initi.l Stu~y '4-019, .a.U,ak. Greens GDP . IPA \"'D~nt
nOM:
StmJICT :
This b to cl.rify our cOllllllenU (on aewen an4 dra1Dage) dated
P.bru.ry 1, 1994 conc.rning the info:rmation provi~ed iD the
applic.tion for the aubj.ct Initi.l Study.
OUr comments on ~r.inage (S.ction I, A through .) noted that
project .pecific improv.ments would be require~ .. d.velopment
occurs and further, that r.gion.l improvement. iD Salt creek an~
Poggi Canyon may be require~ a. d.v.lopment occura. 'l'hi. cOlIIIIent
"as Mant to convey th.t d.v.lopm.nt of th. avera11 Gen.r.l
>>eve1opment Pl.n ar.. woul~ probably r.quir. conatruction of
r.gional level ~r.inage improv.ment.. Any a~ditiDD81 development
which may occur a. a r..ult of this amendment ..y require gre.t.r
capacity in those faciliti.., but we believ. that the added
capacity would be in.ignificant.
OUr comments on S.ction VI, w.n. Gen.r.tion, Doted that aome
.egment. of the T.legraph Canyon Trunk Sew.r will be OYer cap.city
at, or prior to, Gener.l Plan buildout condition..
This comm.nt addr....d the fact th.t the DISTING Telegraph Canyon
Trunk I.wer l.ck. c.p.city to a.rve the buildout d.velopment. A
>>ev.lopment Impact P.e (DIF) 18 pre..ntly iD place for gravity
basin d.velopment, and . T.legraph Canyon Pu1I;>ed "lin >>Ir will be
in pl.ce v.ry ahortly, a. will a S.lt creek ...in >>IF.
Th. p.r.llel and upgrad.d facilities p:rovided for &brough the
coll.ction of th... fe.. w111 be adequate for the p:rovi.1ClZl of
..wer ..rvice to all of the arrectad development area. for... lcmg
a. D.C....ry.
'l'b. additional development wbic:h "1 re8Ult .fftllll th,a PftlSlDa.d
.....~"-nt ..y bve a DDZl-aignificant _act ClZl ClZl& a..-nt of the
..wer liD.. '1'bat i~ct would be that aD upgrade recI'ldred I:wy the
OYer.ll development would iDcna.. I:wy a aiDer degru wlth the add.d
development. .0 iDcrea.. iD . the >>Ir would occur.
..
_, .'IU
'f~~ \II....a.
~ /%~'}r
mJ
. If:ZJ
~r~\1 "";11''' RIJ.l~
ruCK E~GIj\'EERlNG COMPANY
~.,,, 1>1\.~~
r~III(""TH:\ '~110 ~~9t-
"',.,." HI ''1.'-/(1.. lI;: ,","1
,~I~I HI,~7~7
'A' .,.19, ~'I~I,,~
..:;
r;:""l. ..
. -- -..
l~~"
~~.:
February'. 1994
Mr. Clifford S.....anson
City of Chula Vista
276 Founh Avenue
Chllla Vista. California 91912
RE: EASTLAKE GREENS - GENERAL DEVELOPMENT PLA!>l AMENDMENT AND
SPA AMEl'\DMENT (J-12347) -
Dell' Mr. Swanson:
This is 10 confirm Ihat the slorm draina~e s):slem de$i~ned for El5tl.ake Circens has adeqllale
capacity 10 accommodate the nm.off ,enerated b)' additional areas bein, incorporaled inlo
EasLLake Greens SPA boundary. IS shown on Ihe alla~hed uhibit. In addition. areas bein,
added do not adversel)' impaclthe draina~e s)'stem pre\'iollsly planned and appro\'Cd IS pa" of
Tentative Map for Chula ViSta Tract No. SS.03,
Shollld you have any questions. please call me.
Sincerely.
. RICK ENGI"'t;~MPANY
a~u~t:R:.E
Dirr.clor. WllU Resources Division
DCB:IcI.OOI
inclosllre
cc: Mr. Doll' Reed. City of Chllla Vista .
Mr. Bruce SIOIn~ Easluke Development Company
Mr. HOllshmand Afllhi. Rid. En,incerin, Company
~ ;g;-'1/
-
.
r-:-..
.' .
-:
FebNl1')' 9,1994
Mr. Cliff Swanson
City Engineer
em' OF CH1Jl.A VISTA
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
J\.e: EastLake Greens Development Plan and
Spa Amendment 15.94.19
Dear Cliff:
AJ a pan of the review of the referenced initial INdy Ibe ensineerinl
department noted possible adverse impacts to Ibe sewer system seMnllbe
EastLake Greens Project. As a response to this concern, 1 have quantified
the impact of the Plan Amendment in elch of Ibe sewer basins wilhin the
EastLake Greens Project. This review (Inlched) has concluded that the
imPICts of the additional development within elch of the basins II minimal
when compared to previous land use and system analysis performed by the
city.
U you have any questions resardin& this information, please do not
_itlte to call me.
.
Sincerely,
IAS'I'l.AICE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
lnlce Sloan
Senior Project Manaler
cc: DoulReid . Environmental Review Coordinator
,"
~ JJ'-Jr%l
,- "
&
~
fASTLAK(
Drv1LOI'MlNl
CCM'ANV
- E:i ur.m---
WI. "N
"') c,:s,ft
(6") c,.tl3CI
.
L .-
SALT CR..EEK BASIN GRAvnY SEWER ANALYSIS
Sewer lervice to the Sall Creek Basin within the EastLake Greens
'project in currently provided by the OtlY Lakes ROld 1Jft Stltion
Oocated at OtlY Lakes Road and Salt Creek) and the TeJesraph Canyon
Trunk Sewer. The proposed EastLake Greens General Development
Plan and Spa Amendment affecu the foUowing parcels within the Salt
Creek Basin:
Parcel Existing Units Proposed Units Increlse+/
Decrease.
.
-
R.3(south) "2 51 9
R.l0 167 246 79
R.n 92 87 <5>
R.22 146 141 <5>
R.23 205 214 9
R.27 "0 44 4
Nel Change In Units 91
The flow generated by the additional 91 dwelling units (based on 250
GPO per OU) is 15.8 GPM. This amount represents an increlse of
1.4% over the 1100 GPM flow rate assumed to be generated by the
EastLake Project within the Salt Creek Basin (lee TeJell'lPh Canyon
Sewer Basin Improvement and Financing Plan Amendment
Incorporating Pumped FloWl. Fipe 8. 'age 11). The operation or the
OlAY Lakes Rold 1Jft Stltion and TeJell'lph Canyon Trunk Sewer
should not be li,nificantJy implcted by the relltively minor increase in
the flow rate.
."
..35 /c?~/t:JJ
I .
.
l
nL~G~H CAA'YON SEWER BASIN IMPROVEMENT ANQ FINACI~ PLAN
The proposed General Development Plan and Spa Plan Amendment
will affect 4 parl.:els CR.7, R.ll, R.14, and R.24) that ate located
within the boundlU')' or the Telegraph Canyon Gravity Sewer Basin. At
the time the Basin Improvement and Finanan, pWi was developed
IastLIke Development Company and the City asswned the uNt counts
proposed in the Amendment. Therefore, no modification 10 the
TeJepph Canyon Sewer Basin Improvement and Finanan, Plan Is
iequired.
pOGGI CANYON SEWER BASIN
-
Sewer service to the Poggi Canyon Sewer Basin within the EastLake
Greens Projett is cwnnuy provided by the IastLake Parkway Pwnp
Station and the Telegraph Canyon Trunk Sewer. The proposed
EastLake Greens General Development Plan and Spa Amendment
affects the following parcels within the Poggi Canyon Basin:
Parcel Existing Units Proposed Units lJIc:rease+/
Dec:rease.
R.3(nonh) 42 51 9
R.14 84 86 2
R.1S 88 65 <13>
R.20 164 143 <21>
R.2S 74 78 4
&.28 27 60 J3
Net OwlIe In UNts 14
.
The Averqe flow 10 the EutLake Parkway Pump Station Cas oudine4
In the Telegraph Canyon Sewer Basin Improvanent aM FinandJta Plan
Amendment IJIcorporat:fnJ Pumped Flows) Is 254 GPM. At a rate of
250 pIlons per day per uNt the net increase in, aNts prlll'ltes 1ft
additional 2.4 GPM. The operation or the EutLake Parkway Uft
Station and the Telegraph Canyon Trunk Sewer should Dot be
lianificantly impacted by the relatively minor Incruse In flow rate.
ff /$'~/.!J~
.' .'
....
"''''\Il- ..-..~ WEll 1 C. I .. ~ ~'IL.
. ..~~ '" V le.T... &0: ~ICICIL, "I J ~.T.
'AIlD or IDUCATlON
ol"'D._OlClSflI.D
lJ'~~YCUOlN_
....I\OOIlLlS
'Aneu .IIllC
'IlEG~IlHOOVAL
_IIIIIITIHDINT
~. 01.."':1
....e:::
CHULA VISTA ELEMEr-."TARY SCHOOL DIS'mICT
'4 EAST "J" STHrF.T . CHL"L~ YIS1'A. CALU'OH."'IA \11910 · 61114ZG.9liOO
EACH CHILD 15 .....risDi\'WI.:Al. oraRtATwOiiTiI'---'-
March 9.1994
Mr. Doug Reid
Environmental Review Dept
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
.'
RE: ElStLlke Greens GDP/SPA Amendment
Dear Mr Reid
:
The proposed GDP/SPA Ame~.dmen'. will in~rease t!'le total dwelhng unit count
within EastLak.e Greens by ;,- unitS frorr. ~774 10 2871 At the Dlstnct,wide
Iverage student general.or, ra:e of 03 students/unit. t"'IS .qultes to 861 students.
It is anlicipated that all cruldre", from EastLai'.e Greens. including those from the
Iddltlonal 97 units will I!te"'l:! Schc?i No ~5 which will be constructed If' the
ElStLlke Greens Comm.JMy In::l tlas a pro"osed opening CSlte of July. ,e95
ThiS school is planned to cpen em I Ilngle.trlck Ylar.round Ichedule Ind
eventually convert to I moJiMr.ck Yllr.roul'ld Ichedule when required to
Iccommodate enrollment
All element.ry school f.cilltleS within the elstLlke Community will be financed by
partlcipltion in Community FI:.lhlies Olstnct No 1. which fully miligl1lS .11 project
impIcts on IChools.
If you hive .ny qUlslions. pi",.. conllct me
Sincerely,
~ S\.~,~"^'"
Kate Shurlon
Director, Pllnning & Flciliti.S
"'
KS:dp
ce' KIt)' Wright
~ 15--/tfJ;J
~ )%~/!?y
DISCLOSURE STATEMENT
~ I?-I?!-~
....
APPENDIX B
'IHE an' OF anJlA VJSTA DISa.OSURE n'ATEMENT
You are required 10 lIIe a SlalCl\\Cnl of Disclosure olllll\aln ~p or IlDaDClaI iDlCftSIS, ,-ymcnlS, or campaign
contributions, on aU \llllIen wIIlcb wlU requlre discrellottary ICIlon OD IlIe pan or lite City CouDCIl, PlallDlllg CoaImlI5ion, and
all otber official bodies. T1le followlnglttfomtalion D11\S11te disc1o<M'
I. Lilt tIte lIUIles of all penons uYlttga 1lDancla1 Itt_t In IIle property wIllcb Is tIte subject of IlIe application or lbe
CllInlract, e.g.. _. applicant, CllIDlraclor,lUbCllIDuaaor. malerlalsuppller.
EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY (EDC)
CALIFORNIA PACIFIC HOMES (CPH)
~.
2. Uany penon"idenlified punuantlo (1) abcM IsI corporation or panaen1llp,liIllbe __ olallllldMduab ownlng
more lun 1~ of IlIe SUre5 In lite cmporallon or ownlng any pannenblp la_I'D die panaenIIip.
CPH - DONALD L. BREN TRUST
EDC - BOSWELL PROPERTIES. INC.
3.
U Iny penon" identified punlllnl 10 (1) abo\le Is Don-proftl organization or I lrust, IiIIIlIe U_ or any penon
aervlnllS dircaor of Ibe DOn-profil orpnlzation or IS lruslee or bellellciary or truslor or I1Ie trusL
DONALD L. BREN - TRUSTEE
i
4. Have you had more than S2S0 wonh of bllSincss lransacted witb Iny member of Ibe City Slalr. Boanll, Commissions,
Commlllecs, and Council wilhin Ibe plSl twelve monlhs? Ycs_ No..!... If yes, please lDdicale penon(s): _
S. Please identify eacb Ind every penon, 'Deluding any agents. employeel. CllInsullanlS, or IlldepettdeDt CllIDlracton wIIo
you have assilned to represent you before tbe City in Ihis \llllIer.
EDC - BOB SNYDER, BILL OSTREM, CURT CPH - SHERM HARMER, MICHAEL DUNHAM,
STEPHENSON, PAUL NIETO
JEFF FOSBURG
6. Have you udJor your oIIIcen or ...11, Ia tbe aarcpte, ClODlrilIuled .ore tUD SI,ooo to a ~.. Itt \be
_I or preeedlttg cler:IioD period? Ycs_ NO..JL U,., Ute wIIlc:b ClNIlldlm_'ber(s):
Dale: 2/8/95
· · · (N01E: Aad addItIouI.... -CJ ~ ·
\r 0 ~ 0
Sipalure of _Iraaorlapplicanl
I~~/t'/~
. tm!;'~I"": .AHy~/fmI.r"J_I"',joiIfI~ 1 .r.:~,IOCiiIIcW,""""'__..&ft'~I\~"- ~.....PIttiwr,,,...-.
...ONJ~tIIIvr...,...,__.<ily_-"'u ..).~..tIIIvr~~I-"""'__"_~ . ,....,.........
MICHAEL DUNHAM,VICE PRESIDENT - CPH
PriIII or type name or CllIDtrac:lorlapplicant
PUBLIC HEARING CHECK LIST
PUBLIC HEARlNG DATE:
SUBJECT: Q ,d.A.' :.0...... f. +.. *-. ..
.
c,A; fq$
~.h .;.~.~ , ~
t...~ ~~ u....;t#~1
LOCATION: LV" - "s ~ os.
SENT TO STAR NEWS FOR PUBLICATION -- BY FAX ...-/; BY HAND _; BY MAIL
Io/,o/q$
PUBLICATION DATE
MAILED NOTICES TO PROPERTY OWNERS--fA^ o:J:X. ,. .J
NO. MAILED
PER GC ~S4992 Legislative Staff, Construction Industry Fed, 6336 Greenwich Dr Suite F. San Diego, 92122
LOGGED IN AGENDA BOOK C. (9 I ".5
COPIES TO:
Administration (4)
Planning ,,/'
,/'
Engineering
Originating Department
V'
Others
City Clerk's Office (2)
POST ON BULLETIN BOARDS
/'
(,(0,/'1$
SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS:
7/93
.55-
) ~'JtfJ?
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY
COUNCIL of Chula Vista, California, for the purpose of considering a tentative subdivision map
known as Eastlake Greens Unit No. 28, Chula Vista Tract 95-05. The project site is located
along the north side of Clubhouse Drive between Greensview Drive and Hunte Parkway within
the EastLake Greens Planned Community area. The applicant, Eastlake Development Company,
proposes to subdivide 6.0 acres of land into 9 lots for the purpose of developing 51 single family
detached dwellings and make all required improvements. A copy of the tentative map is on fIle
for inspection in the office of the Planning Department.
If you wish to challenge the City's action on this tentative subdivision map in court, you may
be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described
in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at or prior to the public
hearing. Any petitions to be submitted to the City Council must be received by the City Clerk
no later than noon of the hearing date.
SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL on Tuesday, June 20,
1995, at a meeting beginning at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building,
276 Fourth Avenue, at which time any person desiring to be heard may appear.
DATED: June 7, 1995
CASE NO: PCS-95-05
COMPLIANCE WITH AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
The City of Chula Vista, in complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), requests
individuals who may require special acconnnodations to access, attend, andlor participate in a City
meeting, activity. or service to request such acconnnodation at least forty-eight hours in advance for
meetings and five days in advance for scheduled services and activities. Please contact the City
Clerk's office for specific information at (619) 691-5041 or Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf
(fDD) (619) 585-5647. California Relay Service is available for the hearing impaired.
)g-,/oO"
'-
I.
I
PROJECT
LOCATION
GOLF COURSE
CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
LOCATOR ~~5k, Eastllake Development Co. SUBDIVISION
C) ~'D~, No. of Clubhouse Dr. between Requell: Pro~se development of 51 single family
Greensview Dr. & Easlake Pkwy. detached dwe ling
SCALE, FILE NUMBER, J~'j{/9 //g.-/28
NORTH 400' PCS-95-05
I
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXAXXXXXXX) XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXX'X'XXXXXXXXXXX'XXXXX) XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXKXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX'XXXXX) XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX) XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX) XXXXXXXXAXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXAXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXxXXXXXXX) XXXXXXXXAXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX) XXXXXXXXAXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX .
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXX~XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX >>
b430911'00
ReS 10<NT
2310 SP.NISH b.' RO
CHUlA VISTA CA 9191~
04 jO~U9 uO
kESIOE'T
1233 600<G. b.' DR
CHuLA VI~TA CA 91ql5
.
)
XXXXXXXXXXXAXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX) xXXXXXXXAXXXXXxxxxxxxxxxxxXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX) XXXXXXXXXXAXXXXXxxxxxxxxXXXXXX >>
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX) xXXXXXXXAXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX) XXXXXXXXAXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
xxxxxxxxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX) XXXXXXXXAXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
r o. (XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX xxxxxXXX"XXXXXXKXXXXXXXKXXXXXX )
(' .(, .
( O. (XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX). xXXXXXXXAXXXXXXxxxxxxxxxxxxx:XX
C~. ,.; ;8 XX.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)I XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)(XXXXXX .
( 0 1 . 6. X XX XXXX XXX XXX XX XXXX XX XX XX XX XX) I xxxxxXXX >.xxx XXX X xX xXXXX X XXXX XX
- ~ XXXXX).XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX~XXXXX) xxxxxxxxxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
C-. J: . XXX.xXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX) XXXXXXXXAXXXXXXxxxxxxxxxxxxxxX
( (). (XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)C XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX .
(". c:....1l ------------------------
INC
043110270J
F lELDSTUN< INC
5465 MOK uS~ UR #t5U
S._ DI C. ~2121
INC
0431103'00
FIELO,TON. LOMMUNITIE, INC
546' MOkEHOuS UR #,50
S.N OIE(;O C ~2121
INC
( or.,,c
. 'e (l(
al J(
().~(;(
('01 1C
~~.(.(t(
(0. 11(.
~ . <...~ ,,-~
0431104300
FIELOSTu LOM"uNITIE,
5405 M EHDvS. DR ',5v
HN E(;D C. '2121
INC
043110470
FIELOST LOMMUNITIE, INC
54b5 EHOUS< DR ',5u
S.N E(;O C. ~2121
043110510J
FIELOSTu COMMuNITIE, INC
546~ M HOUS~ uR 'i5u
S.N D (;0 C. .2121
)F~//tJ
1 NC
.
.
04311026uO
rl<LOSTD,E MMU'ITI<S INC
,4b5 Mu UUSE OK R2~O
~A~ Gu LA 921L1
.
.
b4 3110 32 uO
FI<LOSTO,E MO,ITI.S INC
,4b5 MuRt SE DR '2~O
,A, DI C. 9,1'1
.
.
b4J11036UO
FI.LuSTO~E O'ITl.S INC
~4b5 MURt. SE Ok .2~O
,.N "I CA 9<121
.
.
INC
.
.
b4311044UO
FI<LOSTD CUMMO'ITI<S
'405 <HUOSE DR .2'0
,. I<Gu L. 921.1
I NC
.
.
b4311048 u
FI<LOST COMMONITI<S INC
5405 .HUUSE OR '250
S. I<Gu C. 921.1
.
.
I 'C
.
.
.
co.c C-
(. .
C 01 C
e.a _
( 0 I .{'.
c-.~ ..
(01 i:)
\,;'".. c ~ ~Wr~"..-...~_.'-'"
2<77 .ILLa. CREeR CIR
CMULA VISTA CA 9191,
59 5 ".,~ ..~- .....-----
( O~. r C. 1096 FOREST LAKE OR
, ._ (1I{ CHULA VISTA CA 9191,
: Gle:
a... ( ,..
~ - '"
~.I,. (\:~~........
(01 (. 108b FOKEST LAKE OR
".Ie>='" CHULA VISTA CA 9191,
....--"'..""--..~...-.,..'!Io..,.,j.
.,.,. ......
....'.~-..,:'~~...'..~:r.'L"'- ,.w..
Jt'IIIP"" _'"of .,:. "',:.."'.....~.,~',""'1_"
.
H
'. '.i"le- ,....~.1:1_4.....
1Ilf'
. .. 'l........'r...:..,.,:.........."
"oj. ' 'f;.1'''.l- _If '.....;.,/'.'" '-......
..'~. lI...'..i'j4tJt"",,,: ___"~II\' ~.__.-.:,..
.~"T,',,!:"'."'-e1I;.~~
;;",;_pf:t~-~("'"
.II""I.\,.'''.,.....al\llII'i....,
.,~~'~,'..~~
." ~.."....A _,.".......,..
595.40360;>
~.. -
221" _ILUW
CHUlA VISTA
. _. .J.~ .b..-
CREEK CIR
CA 9191,
5954404000
CYPkESS-CHULA TA 1 P
C/O H<ARTHST AOVISURS INC
Ib830 YEN A BLVD .3~2
ENC INO 91436
595 "0"00
CYPRESS-CHU ISTA L P
C/O HEAR TONE AOVISORS
IbB30 TUkA BLVD .3~2
ENe l.A 9J.4.;sb
~
5954404"00
CY'RESS-C LA VISTA L P
C/O HE rlSIONE AOVIS0RS
IbBJ ENTU~A BLVD u3~2
EN 0 CA 91436
595440500;>
J
2269 .ILLa" CREEK CIR
CHULA VISTA CA 9191'
595..06000
t
1081 FOREST
CHUL.A VISTA
.. -
LAK E OR
CA 9141~
545~~_~~1 ,,~f~jll f", -
1089 FOREST LAKE OR
CHOLA VISTA CA 9191,
~_.~1~
2251 PEACHTKEE CIR
CHULA VISTA CA 9191,
595't~..DTLI"'i",.-- .l1lIV
2243 PEACHTREE CIR
CHULA VISTA CA 9191'
)g'--))j
5954403700
l.YPRtSS-L A VI STA
c/o HE STONE ADViSORS
1663 EhTuRA 6LVO '352
I:N NO C A 914t3b
INC
)
)
5954't04100
CYPRESS-eHO VISTA L P
l./O HEAR TONE ADViSORS
lbb30 ~TuR~ 8LVO .35~
EN 0 CA 91't3b
INC
I
.
IN C
~951t'tO't5uO
RO~LFO RONALD
CHuLA VISTA LA
S/ANNA . S
9191~
J
J
IN C
59~4't0'900
CYPRESS-LHu ISlA L P
C/O HEAR oNE ADVDORS INC
16630 NTuRA BLVO 'J5~
ENC C. 9H30
..
..
5954't0530D
.C~OROOOOALE DA'REl.L/COLLEEN L
l.HuLA VISTA CA 91915
1
J
5954't05700 .
HOoELL SlEVEN A/LYNN E
-
l.HOLA vI,TA CA 91915
.
5954400100 .
bULLEN CcAoDIO/AIDA o A
.
CHuLA VI~TA CA 9!915
..
~9~4'tOb5 \,/0
"OINTON OIOSOAOO T/GONlALEZ DL .
OA L
CHULA VISTA l.A 91915
.
~954'tOb9\JO
.HITE GR<GORY S/OWE" A
-
CHOLA VISTA CA 91915
.
.
,Q,4lt073uO
LASTlE ShEd A
CHULA VI,TA CA 91915
.
.
5954407700
ACEVES .ARTHA E S
CHULA VI,TA CA 91915
.
.
5954'tDbloO
,ERRANU .00AkOO U/JANE L
tHULA VI'~;- CA ~1915
.
"
I
" , .
59533l41>00
PULLIN MAR~
.
CHULA VISTA
B/.ENDY B
I
CA 9191>
5953315000
OAVIO,ON C AN PARTNeRS
OE . 92014
5953315400
OUMINGUeZ FKANK/KATHEklNE A
1
CHULA VISTA CA 9191,
-.
co. rCJ
r el... . 59533l5.00
CO. (: JACUBU CARL US I/MARIA E
eel; .. u_ r'....l r -.
(01. .~.: CHULA ISfA A 9 91,
ce~ .
(01 ,()
ue c;.. _Il 5954400400
. NORTON STEVlN D/MARILYN S
.,~
VISTA L P
TONE A[)V1SLJR:~
TUkA BLVD W3',Z
CA 9.43&
5954401<00
CYPkESS-CHUL ISTA L P
C/O HlAkT. ONE AOVISURS INC
lb830 V UKA BLVD .3~Z
ENC 1 l.A 9.lt3b
59544011>00
UTl MICHAEL G/GINA J
CHULA VI TA CA 9 9 5
59544 0 2 00 ~
MILlS ANDRE. k
I
CHULA VISTA CA
919B
(o~'r C,
ce,c (.:
(~. co
Qe~ II:
~ o. {> 5954402400
Itte~ : II: ~MELITA L
C. 0.. (. CHULA VISTA CA 91915
l.,.I....=~
5954402.0J
}TEPHEN~Lt~Alr/DENI'E
CHULA VISTA CA 9191,
M B
5954403200
VARGAS USCAk K
'. 'CHULA VISTA C.'91915.
/8'/ // J--
5953314700
VALCARCE" NOEL E/FRATICELLI MA
klLYN
- --'
SAN OIEGu CA 9213B
'9533l5500
o VIDSUN CUS. PAkTNERS
9<014
5954400100
CAL ANTHuNY/PAT~ICIA E
- r
CHULA VISTA CA 9191
,954400500
CYPRESS-CHULA VISTA L P
~/U HEt~~~~TWNE ADVISORS
. I __ _ _
ENCINO CA 9143b
IN C
59544 0 09 uO
.GANA JANUAR 10
--
(HuLA VI~TA (A
M/R:OWt"U H
-T
9191
59544013,,0
.AOMGAkTNER JESSE R/RJSE
CHULA ViSTA CA 919Hlh
j
>>
.
.
.
.
.
.
INC
.
.
.
.
.
.
'9544017UO
NAVARRO KICHARD D/OURAN-NAVARR .
U AD R I AN A
CHULA VisTA CA 91915
,9544021,,0
GRAHAM BKADLEY S/KENDRA 0
CHULA V I>TA CA 9~5
59544025,,0
FEYO.R MARK C/.M.LOA G
L
CHULA ViSTA CA 91915
'9544029uO
AV.LIND .OLAND B/GLOklA D
CHULA VisTA CA 91915
5954403300
.ISBAL OAVIO P/CYNTHIA
CHULA-V~A CA !IKs
.
.
.
e
.
.
.
.
.
I
'430912000
MANkI~UE ALtJANDRU/YOlANOA
cor-l' C, CHULA VISTA CA 91q~
.... t~ C "'~..'~ . U..J'lI ......'_'.......' fl..
C~. (
()e~ l(
1<0. (, ,430913UOO
r (,J",e ,. l( mLmt~M~lR~~~M~~~~~E~
~. (I T . ~ ~..."~ ... pc n~ . p
L,..l.t..\~_~."""~ln rh.M1J~,,~,'....
....,..,.,.,--,."~.-..'... .-._,'
~___'''''''''''.liUt..
~..-_A ~""It",~
..., ,',. "".~
co.r
C er-
e o.
ce<;
.
ce~
( o.
Uee
-
~___...lr""'_
~," ..............-~~
..
. "'"....,......,..~.....j.'-I...'s:'" -'-<W'
"'0.' . . ,'. ..,.....'.."..........._....
_"":r.~'"
I '.",1'''''':''
..."."...~.'.I'~.<,..I,_
--
rlW"il~';~.
.-.,::~r.....!-_~1'.........
6430904300
BARAHUNA J3kGE AIZAMAkO BERENI
CE
E ~UL A~~ c-rr'4'Ph,..-.
6430904700
POUCHET JACK H/~U~AN
. ..... ~ .. - .
CHULA ~-M..,,'(,~.il il _
6430910,00
CARLOS VICTuRIA C
ill -
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
....JI~_, .. ~ ~..._...
",-".,a
~.
(
. ,430910000
(GOMEZ OUNHIANO/VICTOklA
Ii
. CHULA VISTA CA 91915
t .......... .......llJflo,.. ......, e..
..
.'l
_ '430911000
;...- SEVA RAMO' DIROSA V
1 ..
-- CHJlA .WA...<l~9 .i1.U] ~........
6430911400
SMITH WMlrlAM C
...--.... - ~..-
CHU"i...,.A, "..~... -6*~~..!f'IIl
'430911000
ZAVALA NICOLAS/LETICIA G
i . P . ~-
(HULA VISTA CA 9191~
Ill.., Ill.... _JIPl: "A -'~'...,....,;'"
'430912<00
EkICKSON ~lCHAEL T/CY~THIA
c~..-1.~\!!\.....
'430913400
BAY RuOULFO P/EUNA M c
I
CHU~.j'.H W f b.. "" 'i..].
,430913BOO
PEREZ JESUS/PATklCIA
SAN j;~EI~~~_~i~"'.J"-
)6'---/13
04309044 UO
SARAGO,A MARIO/SANDRA L
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
)
04 30~046 uO
NEEL CHRISTOPHE~ V/MELODDIE B
- :
CHULA VI)TA CA 91915
)
)
043091D3uO
JOHNS TUN DEBkA A
CHuLA vlsf~ ~1 ~.U1~
.
)
04309107uo
SUTEHALL EUWIN
-
CHULA VISTA cA
D IRUTH E
HM
>>
>>
04309111UO
bAbAlZ G<RAROO
.-
CHULA VI)TA cA
t
91915
>>
04309115uO
NOBLE "lcHARO R/LINOA L
cHULA VI)TA CA 91915
>>
t
04309119uO
ALOAL JUAN M/ROSALBA C .
-
CHuLA VI~TA LA 91915
>>
)
0430~123uO
SNYDER RUBERT L/ST~PHA'IE L
1!....)l!!I I!. ....,,11. _ r:
CHuLA VI,TA CA 91915
.
.
b4309127UO
KIT"UWSKI DEORGE H/LINDA L
-~........ - -
(HULA Vl~A CA 91915
~
.
P
IN(
0430~131uO
yEP DAVlu/NG-YEP NORMA
] -
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
.
.
04309135uO
NACINO A~N~L M A
--
CHULA VISTA CA 9191'5
.
.
04309139UO
~u KILALITO
CHuLA VI)TA cA
V/ADORACIUN C
91~15
.
.
I
........,...........-:..... . '..'W. ,..,......
595"06.00
DELACkw.L',l,_fL~U,PE_ ~
CHULA VISTA CA _1_1;
iIIo;"~"...................,' ....;.H.........u.-
MENT CD
9191.
~...,_~iJ": ~'~-.,~;
"'.-;....~~
.-...-,.-..-..-..".". ....,-.,..-.,
,...'............."......,~
-
CHULA VISTA CA ~191~
.. .......'ll:...."..........:...........,.
~j~.tm,"tt'rtNi y
CHULA VISTA CA 9191;
"".:.,.;....:'i;IWIM~...,'.......-...
0'39901_00
ESI"!NUS'" SE1<'G.t~ 't'fteAMAS AMALI
A
, ~ ---
CHJLA VI TA CA ~191~
,- ."...,..~""..~ .+I...''''''''*''''..'liI.~~_
0.30902...00
ACE 'l'f'., Gk'lltD'll"N'I'fli.."V'l'll V
-
CHULA VISTA CA _191'
....-.......:.'.-......,."'...:.....--..,
... r,"-- c. ~j~~~.t~~ 'pw
c. e', .: C/O FIELDST
,~. (
()e~ II: SAN
~ O. (
(:~ e (. .: 0.30903100
c..~. (>> FIELDSTONE fAl
'~ e 1..., ="" 'e ~~"'I'EL-l)'H
SAN DIE CA _2121
. L
OMM\;NIT IE S
A n 121
...' 't., . ~ .. .. ....It.... "
.'.<1",;Ih,.;.... ,~;~""..,..t.
~~~~U~,.,.t'Il'mI'I'.'~HELE J
--- - -
CHULA VISIA CA _191;
,.~..t.....,........,,", .
O. 3 09 ~3.;tQ8
MI~ADa,.." "'&II~""""t:"/MNDA 0
CHULA VISIA CA 9191'
)8'---/)1
;95H085 uO
GUIMlON HEkMINID/ROSALIA
II
CHULA VIsTA CA 91915
)
)
CO
)
)
M 309012\;0
OAVIO ED\;A"DO M/MARIA-STELA R .
CHULA VISTA LA 91915
.
o' 309010 uO
VI "I ~U/MI
CHULA VI STA
SU'"
CA 91915
.
"
o. 30_020 uO
OELAROSA RICAROO C/6ENIG"'A S
'. "-~W 8 U ~Iia
CHULA VISTA 1 .
.
.
043090241./0
FERNANOO VINCE",T J
1'" ... _ _ _
'HULA VI~TA CA 91915
.
.
P
INL
.
p .
COMMU"'ITHS INC
P
IN(
0.30_032\;0
MAGBANUA ROBERT/ JE"'NIFER .
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
.
0....090...0\;0
~AKRANTE~ b~lAh K/MAkIA ~
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
.
.
0430~OltOuO
JOCSUN VICIO"IA V
CHULA V I sl. LA 9~h5
.
.
,
_--.'..,.
€:~~~m~'/l"rN;HP
C/O LAN.I.UHN PACIFIC
NEWPORT BEACH CA 92bbu
~J). ~
......... .....~.,~... ~. ~J.._"
~~~~~S nl}JlklE A
~ISSIUN VIEJO CA ~2b9L
.~"." '*,.-,."\'Iil...." ,-"...,.."""",,, .i"',.....
f
-,
~.,~...__to.,""_f:',..... ;
co. r CJ
,.l. Al
.-. (~~1t'n........,..I.-
-""'. .&, HLJt .NTHUNY/MAkILYN~ S
eel';
( ot. ~. CHULA VISTA CA 919B
C..1 .
( 0 to
u. C-' -~ 11r_e'''~~r',.~:t\r'W._'>''''-'''''_
~ MACIA; P IKIMI L
CHULA VISTA CA 9191,
...........~-...-,.' ",~t.8""'"
"II"-'"''''~''' ,,".' , _'-_~.............'''''''''
5"533U2000
",~"""&"'~."~
- --
CHUlA VISTA CA 9191'
tW-,~",~,'''liW-''''*"",,,,,,,.. ....
-~ E
CHULA VISTA CA 9191,
,...~"....... 1. ,tJ L A .'",*'1.
~AJ
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
~,__"'~""'~..w
__I
( () r.,. c t~;7~'S~~'~O:.t"N'TA~
, . i, ( II: DEL MA , 0
C Qt (
().~ II:
~ Ot c.
( () t'. c.... OAV 10 ON"'A~ 1m'"
,~.\C\=~ E ARCA
_u... rr'.R.~ ,."~.pl~...
m~--"--
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
4 Ti", . ,..AN...~-~
~......
IENEulNA S
CHULA V IS T 9 ,
;S"!J5'
59533001"0
KRAU~S MuRRAY/JACQuELINE S
CHULA VI~TA CA 91915
)
5953300500
HONG KuM S IK
CHULA Vt~TA CA 91915
.-
}
)
595330U9UO
LA"RENL~ RUB.RT J/CH~ B
CHULA ViSTA LA 91915
.
.
5953301300
PONC. ARTHUR J/RUSEMARIE J
-
CHULA Vl;TA CA 91915
.
5953301700
LACSON E.NANI M/PEkCIVIRANDA E .
LHULA VI)TA LA 91915
.
5953>OZI,,0
PORTILLA XUCHITl
LHULA VI:.TA LA 91915
.
.
595330Z500
;ANOUVAL RUNALD A/BLA~LA B
ALEXANDRIA VA <230b
.
.
,95330<9,,0
JONE~ ~RAHAM L/JuDY ~
-
CHULA VI;TA LA 91915
.
.
.
.
59533031vO
OE.Y~~T JOHN J/ELEANJR
LHULA VI;TA cl 6.01,
.
.
595330'1,,0
ST1N;ON bAkRY TRUST
CHOLA VI~ CA 9.~
.
.
~q~33045\,.10
cNCINA~ wILLIAM ~/ANNEITE r
tHULA vfnr J u:~
.
.
,
.,.~........................,.~ - -
.430914200
SALUTA ALE~lS
. ."
CHULA VISTA CA 9191,
"'~\'.-4$""'~,t-""'''''t''''''''''''''''
M.,.... _..'........',' "-..:.~~..<.:i ,~~
.430914600
CASILLA, PHIL A/CYNTHIA R
CHULA VISTA CA :~~
....' ......,..''';iH~''''..... ..'.l-,. '~............_....
L1"I TEO pUT>
.......~ """""Jf~"'./'lIII'H""'1iI<
( o. or: .'31000.00
r e ,.,- JI PARCEL "-2'/
(0.<.
e CI yLSAN CL
_-....
( o..ur
() e aI ).
l o. ,(.- .'31001000
U e c:......... PARCE~ "-24/R-'5 L P
SAN C~ t 92.72
..M~""~""'''''1''"<,,,*.',
;..'''-
P
.'.........~'" "",.^'.....A~,..""''*-
.'.;.,~. :t'~l'I~',~\,;..o~ '...-;:,..
L1"ITEO PHn
SAN
~........_....
5 L1"ITEO PARn
S^"
.....-. .;....~.....~
TIES INC
"'V.\-.,,<';:;~"I""""';J~~,~
..3Il00700
FIELDSTUNE ""uNITIE, INC
o..,c,c SAN 01 CA N2121
~ . c "'~".;.flI';' .......,................,...
:0...
Qe~. ,4
.0.]1,'- .43Il011DO
lIJel"1l <t FIELDSTONE loDMU
l.C:1( Iv
e~"4("-
IE S INC
.~'''''''~T#",",''' ,
~p
1.
#'".......4 WL-i.. ~ ,,.,. -~..,...
, INC
1lIt"~, ..l"':........._ T& "'<q;.-
..3Il0INOO
FIEloD,TUNE \,0
S AN I E A
ITIE, INC
)S~))?
.'3091.3uO
ULL"ANN 1<JitTT /"AUREEN
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
.4309147uO
"A"O, J~NrEL~
CHuLA VI)fA CA 91915
64310003uO
PA"CEL R-2'/"-25 LI"ITED
ERSHIP ./"
5~<NTE CA q2.72
-25 L P
A .
j
.
.
.
P AnN .
.
.
.
.'3100IluO
PHCEL R-2./ -25 Ll"ITED PAHN .
ER,H I P
E CA ".7,-
-25 L P
A '-; b 2
P"ENT CD
A loA 9191'
.'31100' uO
FIELUSTONE
"UNITIES INC
,AN U
u CA 91121
"UNITIES INC
92121
O""UNITHS INC
S I NC
SA
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
X XXI( XI( X XXX X xx xx xx x xxx xx xx XX XIO xx XXXX XXXX xx xx xx xx XXXX XXXX XX);
x XXX xx x xxx X xx XX xx x xxx XX XX)\.X XX) xx xx xX xx XX xx xx XXXX XX xx XXXX XX).
x xxx Xl( x xxx x xx Xl( XX X xxx xx XX XX XX; xx XXxX xx XX xx xX Xx xx XXXX XXXX XX>.
x XXI( Xl( X xxx X xx xx XX X XXX XX xx xx Xl() xx xx xx xx xx xx xx XXXX XXXX XXXX XX):,
X XXX XI( X XX II: X XX Xl( xx X XXX XXXX xx XX) xx xx xX xx xx XXXX xx xx xx XX xx xx XX):,
X XXX XI( X xxx x xx xx xx XXXXXX xx xX XX; XX XX XX XXXX xx xx xX XX xx XX XXXX XX).
LI J ~I'....
.
LABL 00703 ORC-~5-19
CUNDO: <1_ GHENS 51 UNITS AT
XXXXXXXXXI(XXxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
X xxxxx Xxxx xxx xx xx X xxx XXXXXXXX:
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
X xXX Xl!; X XXX X XX xX xx X XXX XX xx xx XX)
ifI.A',ft< '-1',,; ';., *..~........,~ ~"...
.
''''/1',:.'''"' ,'o:..:~,~,,~;,-,,~,,"L " ,.~. 'ti""t
.
.....
..
595330430J
R ESIOENT
228b LOB~ MEADO~ PL
CHU~A VISTA CA 91~15
.
"
".. _iio"" ''',t'.. "~u.<'''' ...a~_ ~ _
LAB.. 007>3 URC-95-19
II CONJO: E/. GHENS 51 UNIT, AT
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXl
C O. r,' XXXXXXXXXXXX~XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXl
X XXX XX XXXXX XX XXXXX XXX XXXX XXXX)
r .l.' . . XXXXXXXXXXXX.(XXXXXXXXX"XXXXXX)
'~'!l~"t"""... -.....t',,,.....~~,,, ,-",.p. (....... V l ~
c. t: '. XXXXXI(XXXXXXXXlC.XXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
C 01' (' . XXXXXXXXXXXX~XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXl
('.... XXXXXXXX~XXX~XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
,,' ~ XXXXXlC.XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX:
c.. Q. ( XXXxXXXXXI(XXl(XXXXXXXXXXXXXXxX)
(j. V _, . X XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXl
.....1..."''''., '~~~~~~ol:,"",l ..........~.,:.._.__ ~~ ~- --
b431lJl10J
F IE_JSTDNE CJ INC
A n 111
.
.'
..
..';,.. ~", ~~..y~~ .'.
INL
.......~..II
.l.___...........
I'H,
." .'
~"+ ...-...~,,..,...
1"\"."
.........."'. '.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXx
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
~9~3,;l_700
RESIOENT
10~b WAT~RvILLt LAKE Ru
CHULA VISTA LA 91915
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX~
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXXXxXXXxxxxxxxXxXXXxXx
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX);
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXx
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX>.
xxxxxxxxxxxxxXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX)
INC
I NC
M 31.03000
INC FlELuSTONE CU INC
~4b5 MOREHU E DR .Z,O
SA' llEGU A ~2121
t ..,...
","~'W""""
b _311J 330J
F IE.J5 TO,"
5 _6~ "ORErl
S AN OlE GO
.....,.{.
,'!.....
iIi."
.;f~:"'-'
r""b~' c )r_';MII.lf,:....f'f.,....~......,..lI. ...!"<....
."1(( ~43110370J
, '- . F IE.JSTON, CD !TIES INC
C GI (}( 5_6~ "ORErlD ilR 0250
().~. ( SAN DIEG A 41111
~Ol()( ,\
.~.. c~..7r". '~-:;1~'::~;'" "",,,.,
'J.\c>'lL.( ~ FIE.)STONc C U"!TIE5INC
5_6~ .'ORE E ilR 0250
SAN 01 E 91111
'.
~_"''i .'i',:....i".j".....:,'iII:,.Ol'l<.,,~
"""""04"3'1"1".-"-
F IE..J5TONc MUNITIES INL
5 4b~ M ORE USE UR 0250
SAN OlE CA 91111
_....... ':':"~" ",~."" i~,!".t:"tf.t..~~f,,":<tt
.,,1-,,1'1 ~ .LI'"'*"~<".o!<~i'
b H.1H90J
FIELDSTONE
54b5 ..., ORE~
SAN olEG
IN..
Iff';- /I?
b _311uObJJ
~ESTE<N SALT CD
POBJX149
SAN DIEGO CA 91112
I NC
MMUNITlES INC
:.E OR 01~0
CO 9<121
b_ 3110_2UO
FIELuSTON "MMUNITIES INC
5405 MO UU,E Ok 01,0
5A' U 0 CA 92121
M3110_bO
FIELUST E CUMMUNITIES INC
~405 EHUUSE OK 02,0
SAN EGO CA 92121
0_3110~000
FIELuSToNE MUNITIES INC
54b5 MOREH SE Ok .2,0
SAN UIEG LA 9,1,1
Cu
92111
5953304500
OAVIOSON CAN PARTNERS
12505 P NTt DEL MAR '200
DEL CA .2014
5953310200
SHEiKhER FAM~iT
_I .
CHULA VIsrA CA .191,
5953310000
HOFF.A~P E/MELINDA G
-- ! ----~
CHULA VISTA CA 9191,
~
co. r.:l:_
l . l,.'t. 5953311000
( 041 I - ROS ILLO J MANUE L/LDKE NA 0
c.a (I
(041. t' CHULA VISTA CA 9191'
c.a (1I
(041 .
u. c:. E..J( 5953311400
DAVIDSON PARTNtRS
( O.',)C
,- . '" (I(
c ~. '.
Q.~(l(
~o.. .
fd. ~ ( ll( 6~e331HOO
(041 '..
'--'.1.'. ,,_'" DEL MAR
....Hia,
"''''''_-I'IIMi~..
5953311000
HERNANDEZ JO~_h
CHULA VISTA CA 9191,
5953312<00
DAVIDSDh CD, N PARrN RS
DEL MA A 92014
5953312000
DAVIDSO ,CAN PARTNtRS
o 014
5953313000
DAV N C A
DEL M A 92014
PARTN~RS
5953313800
BAUTISTA CONRAD B JK/EMILIANA
T
CHULA VISTA CA 91~
5953314.00
~MlYN P
~
),?~/)Y
j
.
,953310300
MOhTALVO FER~tr~~/STELLA R
~LA VI,TA CA 91915
,
.
59,331U700
ULlVU AU.USTU E
~'TA CA 91915
.
.
5953311100
UAVIUSON CuSCA~TNERS
~~9.AI4
.
.
,9,33115uO
~~J[:-O~IN M/~~H~E D
A LA 9191
.
.
,9533119"0
~AGATU..lIlTO
(HULA VI::>TA CA
GLC.ARMELl TA L
9191,
.
.
AN PARTNERS
LA 9.014
.
.
CAN PARTNERS
9.014
.
.
PARTNERS
.
.
59533135UO
~EUliNE V
CHULA VJ~TA CA
9191t ~
.
.
59533139.0
Llu LIAN XIANG/WANG MEI TING
CHULA'U~1 ~~o.g'
.
.
,9533143 uO
~
~
.
.'
,
*,.--_..."...~
""~'-'~"'''''''' --,.,~
/I! " ......,.-ili "........."'..................
...-.:.;~~,............-
.........iW......... ~'.....M.... ,bod( .L ......
.."........~....J. '1""- ...
.....<~Iw."......
_1t~...;.;.,~.t....-1lI)lIiI~......IJ".,~.
1I':..,'..~~.....~ti!.,.."t~
....~...............t\lIIIMiIf....... ...........If,....
,"""'*,' n n lA.1 -'r..tltI:
.....,.~.~'~fPtlWl~w.jIt
5 q5333 4b03
FUN. HNE (AI SNING
..b... _ __.... .... _........ . _
CHULA VISTA CA 9191~
r-
..~_..."'. .',
5 q533J500J
. ~AVIOSON C
HL MA
A
...\.,....,.........
5953310403
LAN~L)IS ~EED V/SulANNE R:I:VOCI
3LE LlVINWRUST
A'R'l.IJJ '-'~IIl~~J yjJT'\." 91'115
~
o. ,- (
r.,. ..
(01 ( e
(CO~ ~ -I~...-
c. . ~ II
( o. II(
u.c;,,;..,_ .
5953310803
LAI M1NG eHE/YANG HUA
U.A
A
A 919
""I>~''''''''''''''''''''~
5 95331120J
~
CHU..A VISTA CA 9191,
~"M' ",.1........._;.1....
5953311bOJ
o ELJSiOBi' PUR ~
CHULA VISTA CA 91915
..l.~~.....~~....:.
5 q53312 003
.. DAVIDSON ~D . RS
92014
."M
.'W-,->f. ....
5q5B12403
~~L[:IU~l )/~~~ A
A CA 9191,
............--~..,..
RTNERS
( o~.r'.c A 9 014
,: .'~ (;f'w.....
C C). .. ·
~. ~ ( ;( 595331320J
t 01 .. . DAVIDSON CDS' N PARTNERS
~. (. ( ,,( L MAR v2014
\J().\:6'(..,...._~. ....--
5 q53 313bJJ
~
~
~-.......................~""".
5 953314003
~ARIAL
~
.'. 1I1.ttS.Ui.' ~....,/.
)$/)) 7
5953:>04700
EAST.OUD AV 0 J 'A
ULA VISTA CA 91915
5953310100
HANONO OAVIO J/OENI
C
15
A
59~3310500
FLORES RUBERTO 0
CHULA Vl~A Ck'H15
5953310900
TRE V N ANURO
~
C ULA VISTA LA 91q15
5953311300
CASAbOSCH MIuU<L R'AOELA A
~
AN PART",EI<S
PA TNE"S
r"'EkS
5q~3313700
~ALOINE F
~
5q 533"100
~
~
I
~~,
.~. ';ft...."
'i"."!I< -.".."
,_.,,;....'.'~'.I'.""',.....!',I..,,...,'If'^','~
~
-,,,,,,"'>9 ,.;:,,"',;;Jt\.,. ~~-i';'."~""""",-" ....' ,..;
"'.,....."I"""'..4<~'\,"l>J111~.
...--.......,r
. ........ ."~
tt;:,..~,< 'Io"';',,~.I"H'~~~~' '", do'...' "'ij)
.. ,',
tf...
.
~I'j ,:", '~,;f ,. ,~,<llo,
""
...........l,t.l!;-,.,. ,'I>',i';"j;.....
~,.
,j,,';' .,>i;.,'...:;.~;.-'it--. '".. i~'4
.......';.-I"~"',..~t'j.,
~.~ -~-'.5.953ijiOrJ".'._:~
:tlTi"KE )E~E~ir1.NT CD
CHUe" VISTA CA 91914
-, --.S.~m1f2.(fJ..+..
<ERSC1 FUNl J/CJNSTANCE H
CHU_A VISTA CA 9l'!f\5
~"II --...'"
~- ~~~mpte:L... r
. ~){ Tl"I' L Y TRUS T l
CHUeA VISTA CA 91915
....
0.'.
r . ,. .{ J' ·
( 041 rM.
C . f.:{ :1
(041 lI'
C . ~ 0'
(041 .
U . c:. (..>l
........'
~ -"~53~'dlW'"
. TON:; HYMJNO JR/JANOT
CHUeA VISTA CA 91915 4.
.
, ,-, '~rl'jJl,,-6J "'I:
~
:HUeA VISTA CA 91915
"
.., . 59~33J1866 .~
~I"
CHUL,A VISTA CA ql~l~
f~ .'
". 5~533ffrsJ'-
"'YEilS eRI.l~ A./I(ARi::N E
~l - ~
CHULA ISTA CA 91915
....'..,.v/ ;"5~95'33:>tbd'j ...~
:;OLDBECK .ILLI"M J/FRIESTAo Ct
RISTINi E
CHUlA VISTA :A ~1~15
.
( 0 ~"ri'C ....''''''.~953.:lJ'3o.clJ...
,~ . ': :{.( . < IN;; _ANJ1 B
~ ""41 .. - -
~ ~ CHU~A VISTA CA 91415
a.~ (( ~J
~041 .-
"...I'1"f: :l,
l cat . ~
"'.10'."-.',,"
'f
'5'9~335'3~dd .,.
DAVIDSON :0 PARTNERS
JEL M :" 9201'
,'95l3'J3llif3 .,'"'
'HLL _I MAK Y ~
CHUlA VISTA CA 919
..
. '. .'" "'5.q5H~2'llJ '-
SMITH EU~,NE TlNENITA D
~LJlA VISTA CA 919i5
1ft") J..O
O",MUN lTV ASSN
~
~A 91914
5953300300
RATEeLE JOHN ~l~
---
CHULA VISTA LA 91915
595 H00700
HUNHR Q.A'UD C
11_
CHULA VISTA CA
91915
-
595BOll00
JONE; MI~~AEL K/GERTRUOE B
CHULA VISTA LA 91915
595B01500
MART INEZ hMUN
CHULA VISTA LA 91915
595B01900
AH M H S,AN M/M THE~ESA
CHuLA VI ST A i.A 91 5
5953302300
OBELeO OOOIE P/CARMENCITA _
CHULA VISTA LA 91915
59 5HO 2700
~UE
~
595H0310o
DAVIDSON CUSLAN PARTNERS
DE L MAR CA 9 .:~r, ti
5953.03500 ~
O~C~' P~
tiEL CA 9lDI'
5953303900
~
~
595330'300
HARRUO CLAUDeTTE A
C/O HARRU~l ~)~"~
SAN UIEGO i.A 9.:1l7
,
.'111 r kM'1;.''4t .,....~.,..',',~.
,''''-A_lt _ r .-V- I
_...;ql1U.~ ~n _....ll;~~
~~(.I",.., t .'fIJlJt..~
_It. ,..,...,. ~k ....
~_..
.....,..._........_~",1'}.,..~"..
_1>. ''''''..,'''~......~,.~
."~'''''''''''''''''''!f.,....,..'f:''' ,.';,,'"
.;_,.......,....~;.;'..-;'Io~,.i .".
............;.<..1.-0'""",......,,..,,''''". _'.-,~"iII;,:'.",-
~.,..'-.._..,.,'......W(..~...<f..
.~ - ~._~.~,~
.-<._."t~,J1~-
. CYP"E,S-CrlUL~ V
cia rl<ARTiSTJ
EN IN) C 143b
R IN C
.
IlL
.. ..,;',
5 95~~J38D)
CYPHSS-CiUL~ ~
cia rl<ARTiSTJ UVISORS INL
E NCI"'J CA 43b
.. "__'..~*..,,, 1I J
>..
= NCI
VISTA L P
TJ""E ALJVISORS .I.NC
C~ 9l~ 3b
((_o.'-t::, <<~ <..!"",....~.,'}."''',...., '_
( O. ( 595HO~bOJ
. CYPHSS-CiUL VISTA L P
C. '':.r< c/o >iEARTrt NE AUVISORS INC
(0. r ,
(.. J :}( . - NCINJ ~ 9l~3b
l (). &.-.._
( . e \.:0 ,-'( 595HU50Jl
.. CYPHSS-CiUL~ ISTA L P
cia H,UTiS NE ~UVISURS INC
E NCINo 9l43b
_, ,....,'.l;... ",~, .l/1li;.....' --. ''',
5 95~~:J5'OJ
rlER"EH JSCA~ C/MAC~S
CHUL~ vlsr~ CA 91H5
H.U
.'t.t:....;........~~~
TDBIA~ ALEJA1i.O.RO P/C,ELDA U
- -_..
CHU4.-A VISTA CA ":Il~15
.... .","'__'. folill"''' ..';J.It"~.l);"
5 95HJb20J
?UINO'EZ MELiHOk
CHUL~ VISTA CA 91~
'-)1 -......, .
..
5 95~~ObbDJ
lIIlEEtiAN MI:HA::L
CHU.~ O~~ CA
'/HEIDI A
91.,,--lt
( ()~'r"
e: ( (
(). l(
c;e" ( (-~'
( O. - .1f _"~ .. "I. .. ,,"'4lIIIIt....
(.> e ,. ( ( _ 595H0700J
( -(). ~ . C YPRE,S-CrlUL
"" c/o H::ARTi
~e"-\~'l
~..-!I'q;<"!";"')~.";"''''
5 9544J 7~JJ
~ R~l ZA JA; I ER I IMARI~ L
~
tIfh.I.--~:~_' 1l~ll'~;;.:~
5 95~~U78DJ
~I=LA
~5
)8" jeJ)
KS I NC
595HD 3900
CHRtS,-CHUL ISTA
C/O HEAR H N' AD,I,DkS INC
EN CI iii
A ~14t3b
INC
INC
P
RS INC
EN C I NO
A '114t3b
5954405500
ALCAL~ ~LFUN,O B/lkMA
~HULA VISTA L~ qiql~
5q 5~.0 5900
~
CHULA VISTA CA 9~915
5q~4..0b300
MEIEK STcV~N ~'CARY L
CHULA VISTA ,1 OiOr,
5q5440b700
bL ANU KI ET
~A VIS'A ,1 Gi~
5954407100
!A~bS ~MBr!rPC~ U 9 MtL~ INE U
VISTA ,
5q 5440 75 00
~MINIA G
~
59~4407900
AY~ON ERNE~T R'TkA~EY A
~
t
.-1 '<:~'~,/!Il"""".;..~,.ltt,1l'.~' ";.,.,.,+
.'.L"_ ...._...,JIL'..'.'t>~~~.",'~,'. ,,~
."., '''''.'..;..-.~t:...... ...<,./l1li......'..
--
'~'...........'..."f'. '.
..
.,.llo>.....'.~"'J~'~ ,:t<'...<<,,,. ;;.10;'''
.' ~1il'_...F"'..,;.'JIo. ".~.,"""~,.,, ,<..
...
..~~..,. A.$.... ;,',"..' o'fl..'.'<'.'~
....,:t:4~"'II.,*"-~~'~.~:. ~- iff; HJ.......
.-~':' .""-I>;<,,,,~,.,.:,-~..:.....
......:';#I.~ ..i.....i.. ";lftJ~
t:_i)""t.....;;.~.'MIt -''''-;'V ,'" ",-<<~
(:,"!,~';._.:-.,),
"......,,~;.. ,,"I
595331HOO
~OB1NSON HGINAcD P/HtRNANDU-
ROBINSON ESHcA
~~UCA VISTA CA 91915
.... ,''1;''''''. ~,"' . _"\t. <M,,~,.,.....,;..,;.....",
5953314BDO
JIRA OANI.D P/VICTORIA R
---
OtUCA VISTA CA 91915
.."...-:.,...',.,0 W'...;;;......,wlt...'.._..""... ,,,:"'"
5953315200
~M
~rA"~
,
~,__,o;<.- .l.....,~~;,."w. ."i"~,L'~
O. r ( 5953315&00
" . DAVIDSON COSC
,et. .
C 01 { a 9201"
ce~'If.
CC?.: r~1i'''-~;~HO~2';0'' ,
ca. . . ACBH:HT C-<AHES A/TAMME,A C
ue0,-_ tHUCA VISTA CA 9~
.'
'.~ ,c
.
.... ".
5 95""OD&00
BuENO JOVAS N
~ -
HU~A VISTA CA 91915
....!...~il............I't'~..~,-. j( ~
STA C P
A"VISORS INC
.....:;W..... ..::ll.-...."
5 q5't~Jl~Oj
HAi11;f JOYNACOJ F/RUSAUNUA R
Ct-tULA VISTA CA 911115
_;,.vV--~.~...._...."..."""",,,.....
5 95""01&00
DONA~JE <,Vl~ F/leRESA
CHULA VISTA CA 9Pll15
( 0.' r.c
(-~ . (~ ( iIM-"~~oo\~~"''''--t~''';~''''''
(~. .
0."(,(... 595""02200
. 0 1 -. ' K 1M R~N
r", . ,. ( !'( C HUC A VIS TA C A 91915
lOI . ..
G · ~~~~'''''~P~'~~'46~~'C;J"'r"",
JECED' GUlTAiO 0
~
....;,1/-' '\..,-. ........,. ".IlW"~'.~
5 95""03000
GUZMA. EV,UTU B/QUICHO RuSEM.
~ IE Jl
-- --... --
CHUi..A VISTA. CA ql~15
.Ifliilf'l!'_.~:..tl~. ..
) ?~/..2;?,
595331"500
8AR8UZA SAC/CARMtN
CHUCA ~ISTA ,A qttl~ -
59533l't900
~
CHUCA VISTA ,A 91915
5953315300
HICKS BARRY M/,HRISTIN. A
CHUCA VP!\A CA 9~~l~
595""00300
YOUN~ DONALD E/E~LINDA C
CHUCA VISTA ,A 91~
595""00700
CYPRl:SS-CHULA VISTA L P
C/U HEARTHSTuN. AO~I,DRS INC
EN,(NO CA 9l't3o
59 5""D 1100
7E uS T~
CHUCA VISTA
JOHN R/CtONORA G
,A 9191~
595""01500
JAZO GUAOACUPE J/~ARY H
- - T
CHULA VIS A CA 91q15
595""01900
iUS AcEX A/IRENE G
CHUCA VISTA CA 91915
595""02300
OTERU JOSE W/JU01TH
CHUCA VISTA ,A ~1~15
595".02700
ANOERSUN H.IN~ICH A/PATRICIA
CHULA VISTA LA 91~l5
595".03100
MARQUEZ JOSEPH/CYNTHIA 0
C~UCA OI~YA tl 4~
.. 'J~;"'_,_"'"
.....1 r J. . ,I
..~. ,",.I..T ",~In UII>..
J ,.,..11111 ..,-
.'.n~'~.Jljl. W'".
-_.-
~iI' Yl'1t'" (I1~ll. J _",....,""'"*"
...,...~".:..
.h.:~'. ~ 't'''''
..w''''."" .."...",,-....
~.,. .[1;' >~',. ....,~.......~.....'*"',.~.
.....~.'.~....,"""".,.'.
.,..~~ ~..... II
..~~~~~r~i~,~. ·
CHUL.A VISTA CA 91~15
.
-
~. -~~l~J.te~Rf7SH..ON_.
CHUL' VIST' C' 91915
~ 4309H900
--H~"~ff~H'5W2g~~~~ I~m
S'N 01 EGO c' 921L
.
rO.'T
r . (. .t 11
CO. I ~430910400
C..;~~.~ M/VI~M"
(01.... CHU.' VISTA C. 91911.
('.~ (l' .
lOl .
L..v(..'(
-~~..""..
'~ERC'D~IST'~ISL'u/SOCOkR"
C HUL' V I S I' C' 9141 ~
-+~a>~~~til'f"'ElELl5' M
CHU...A VISTA CA Yl~lO
_..,J ~~~~Qlttf.\'b G/COUZO~ R
CHUL' vlfll CA 9l~15
""_.. ~~n~:3~~""h'RL' J
CHULA VIST' CA ~l~l~
~ 430912400
( or'c___-~/.LlC" M
,>.'~.( CHU.VISTACA91915
(0.($( .
Q.~. ( f'
~Ol(;K
Cd....
l (). f'"'iIt'
G....~"
':.~"';f........ ~=~~ -""".O~
NA.lO) U..lAS OIr:VA"GEL..I NE
S
~
,.,utlll 't~r!~!aJ'6~P1 A/KATHL~Eh F
~
J?/j:2}
b430904200
P.NETTIERE MICH'EL J
~~L' viSTA C' 91915
b4 3090 4b 00
LINVILLE J.MES '/BETTY L
(HULA VISTA LA q191~
INl
b430410100
ME5CHOUL.M 'LFkEDO/JAN"
CHULA VISTA L' 9191~
b4 30~10500
lAAK)O WILlIA~ L/BAKtR SHAkO~
.
~L' V~A CA t.U1~
b4 30~I0900
S'LO~MtNTE
CHULA VISTA CA 9J.91o!-
b430911300
~AkGARET A
CHULA viSTA L' 91915
04 30~11700
~
~
b4 309 III 00
i-'~CHEZ HEl.TUR/LtTICIA
CHULA vl"-A (;.~
b430912500
MCIRvlN AL.EN E/OIANe L
~
b430912900
~
~
b4 30~133 00
KOlA~IC "ICHAEl A JR/ANN-MAR.
~
b4 30~13700
~
~
,
"'^" """""'.."""~~:~ff.o.'"'fi,..l~~
,. '"",, .,...,'.".;.......~\..1'IMl..11,.'.;;~,if ,.~
#." V.'f',;; ::*'.1'-'10""- . I' (~"&J"W~
,.. \.;.......'...',~'IHI..~_~.~.).'.""
6,;;'.0..>"'"',0 '-.. .&..~...."......:, ....'.....
~i',,;'.~,'......"i'~' ;I~
..,...." holii-'~"~'~"oI""",,~
*',_""";1'.'~"'''''' <11cQllW~"l~.
--~"",,---
~,.,,~ ~".;"'l\ll:...'~!':4 ,;..-..".""
lf~ ,-St-"'~""~...u,,+,_...'ll'<""'"''
~~.~ ~1if;.'}'''''tf-~, ~':i!N'___ .~_...
59544,820J
JRA.E WI~_IA~ III/ROSA M
I
..." C .......A...llI.HA..CA. 9hI5
5954408bOJ
SANTOS RAY O/NER~llA C
_.,."",~~w.... 91915
5 43)9,010J
F IECoSTO~E FAIRWAY RIDGE c
r/O FIEhOSTO'E iR"MU'ITIE'
__....,,~.t.~,,~.u.~.~,~2121
o.r..-:
r .C':(. 5 '3090050J
(01 I . F IEcoSTO'E FAIRo
o.e CD - FI OSTO'E
COl.
C'.~ 01 .
lOI .
U.. V (.,111
~
5 '3J9J0900
. CAS<EH O:~SJ~
- --
_. . ..~J!.~J.L.. V.!.UA.~
IILUNI NGNI NG S
91915
543HJl30,
~OPF_i~~-OS F/MARTH4 E
..~~!;, ~...V,I~.!';."W 91 91,
5 '30901700
YA~G TEN.-~SIUNG/HSIU-"A~ ~IU
* "'Q;i,.;W\~~~L,~.,",V.l;~l,,~~ 9191~
~""">'-
; '3:>9;>2 100
HYDE "IC~4RO W JR/ANITA
~..w.b~"f.: 91~
o ~' r')C '.
'~." (~.
( ~I .
Iit.~()( ~
.01 .-:
"'.~("( ..
O. . FIE~o
L. . ... ""'10.....'.,."" .
.
b '309, 330:>
~IOAO J
CHUcA VISTA CA 91915
.'''.....'_,. ...::.'w......: .,' ,..'.....-. w.........
b '309, 370,
~INA
CHU~A VISTA..I..A 91915
~~'f!'lli&'".~ti
/3>/;?;/
595....08300
TEPP"R"AN 5AM~
CHU~A VfSTA CA 1915
59'....08700
~TCU
C~5TA CA 919'1..ft
P
INI
P
I'
P
INI
P
I'
b' 3090 1000
DIAl JOSE/UO~oKES R
~15
b':;O.Ol'OO
~IK~.Y M
~915
....0901800
KUSUMOTO TAMuT'U/E~Il'bETH
~
b'30.02200
~TYO
~
P
INI
P
Ir,
P
INl
b' 30.0 3000
SIE8ER WI~~IA~ J/BEC':. E~ll'
.f.I.tj"
-.. -
CHU~A VISTA LA 91915
b'30.03'00
~
~
b' 3090 3800
~
~
,
~ 430914800
. A L
:HULA A 19
ro.';( e
(' e l. .( JC
( 01 I .
ree C.I
( 01. r
c..:.~ (lC e
( 01 .
U . c:, (.,)\
.
SAN
() .. (",.
,:.'~.. \
( Q. C J(
~.~. (
~OI'lIf
"".... (
(GI (.:
v.I.'.~.,,-
~ 430914000
GAIN JEFF<EY k~
:HU_A VISTA CA 91915
~ 430914400
~A
b 43100 120)
.AR:E. R-2"~-
E rllP
SAN
SAN
TIE~ INL
.,
M~u~ITIES INL
,
-
U~ITIE~ INC
1
~u~lTIES INL
) ?,),))'
b430'i4100
BARIL MICHAEL b/JO~EFINA G
CHULA ViSTA LA 91915
b430'i4500
~
b4310001UO
PARC.L R-24/R-<5 L1MIT.0 PART
nnLh_ _
SAN CLEMENTE CA 9Zb1l
P ARl
643Iu01300
PARC.L"R-24/k- 5 LIM1TtO PAR]
oR SH 1 P
SA' C
64 nuo 1700
P
92b7<
INC
./
<S INC
INC
loS INC
s
,
"'~~",''''''Of;''
...~,:J~"i'~ "~~i""
. .......~, ')lI~'..~~.r- J UPU"f In 11 ,..
"~'\" ~'~"""'_F.tiIM rmil,'. ...
~ ,:'''''':'''.-{~'''nO.'''''''''''
.'''''"f,-._.b,M' ~~ ~ 1 __
-
1/III(1Wl'~...,t.~,~"~"
.. ___,_:!I!'WIW
.w,~"'''i'''''''dkJ ~ ......
,.." ..,1_1 ,..,,""Il...........,
'1 '.. ,IJ.!Jg"IlIf......
..-< 411~ J.. ""~~"l''''"'
.., ._-....,..-..........
'-~ JILJl,I'T;otli."......~,~ ~
#I.~.'" Jf'f .........~tlI.lt~,lW1u~..
...l~~,"" ..,II.....'H.{'...
Il'f'W~_.~iIl:~-#S
..~~'~..:. ~
".....'~,-; ~,," ,'ot;:lt:,\~'-~/Io~"..h.ilJllb.~
,......',,dI
JIIil:t~"dIt~.,~:. .:...,,-.
~ .~..~..~f"'~./i.'~~H'k.-,,:i.
"'Jl'r'~. ~~AYJ.,'.'*'.
.. l_J_,_J ';;Oil
.-
.....111' ~..I_l'_ r1."~
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
BY THE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT THE CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL will hold
a public hearing to consider the following:
A tentative subdivision map known as EastLake Greens Unit No. 28, Chula
Vista Tract 95-05 to subdivide 6.0 acres of land into 9 lots for the purpose of
developing 51 single family detached dwellings and make all required
improvements.
If you wish to challenge the City's action on this matter in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this
notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Clerk's Office at or prior to the
public hearing.
SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL on Tuesday,
June 20, 1995, at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building, 276 Fourth
Avenue, at which time any person desiring to be heard may appear.
DATED: June 7, 1995
Publish on June 10, 1995
)J-"/:2?
NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING
BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT A PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY
COUNCIL of ChuIa Vista, California, for the purpose of considering a tentative subdivision map
known as Eastlake Greens Unit No. 28, Chula Vista Tract 95-05. The project site is located
along the north side of Clubhouse Drive between Greensview Drive and Hunte Parkway within
the EastLake Greens Planned Community area. The applicant, Eastlake Development Company,
proposes to subdivide 6.0 acres of land into 9 lots for the purpose of developing 51 single family
detached dwellings and make all required improvements. A copy of the tentative map is on file
for inspection in the office of the Planning Department.
If you wish to challenge the City's action on this tentative subdivision map in court, you may
be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described
in this notice, or in written correspondence delivered to the City Council at or prior to the public
hearing. Any petitions to be submitted to the City Council must be received by the City Clerk
no later than noon of the hearing date.
SAID PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE CITY COUNCIL on Tuesday, June 20,
1995, at a meeting beginning at 6:00 p.m. in the Council Chambers, Public Services Building,
276 Fourth Avenue, at which time any person desiring to be heard may appear.
DATED: June 7, 1995
CASE NO: PCS-95-05
COMPLIANCE WITH AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT
The City of Chula Vista, in complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), requests
individuals who may require special accommodations to access, attend, and/or participate in a City
meeting, activity, or service to request such accommodation at least forty-eight hours in advance for
meetings and five days in advance for scheduled services and activities. Please contact the City
Clerk's office for specific information at (619) 691-5041 or Telecommunications Devices for the Deaf
(TDD) (619) 585-5647. California Relay Service is available for the hearing impaired.
) ~~ / ~ ?
(l/l<.J2 ~~
June 20, 1995
Honorable Shirley Horton, Mayor
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Dear Ms. Horton:
I am writing to challenge a correction notice recently issued to me
by the City of Chula Vista Building Department.
On June 19, 1995, an inspector from the Building Department issued
me a correction notice for the fence on the east side of my
property. (See attached copy). Apparently, this inspector had
measured my fence from my neighbor's side and determined that it
was too short, due to the fact that I have a pool in my backyard.
The inspector did not measure the height of my fence from my side
of the property.
The fence on the east side of my property is five feet tall, and
was in existence when I purchased this property in 1976. At the
time of purchased I was not informed of any code violations for
this property. Moreover, I installed and received valid building
permits for my pool in 1983. At that time several inspectors
visited my property and inspected all of my fences- all were
approved as being in compliance with the Building Code. Since that
time I have made several additions and improvements to my home, and
every time I have been found in compliance with all applicable
building code regulations. In short, I have always used due
diligence in complying with all regulations affecting my property.
Accordingly, I am shocked by the correction notice issued to me on
June 19. There are several problems with this notice. First, the
notice does not specify how I can remedy this alleged violation.
There is no statement as to how tall my fence must be. The mere
statement that it does not meet the standards of the Municipal Code
is too vague, and does not give me any idea of what those standards
are. Moreover, the notice does not refer to the section of the
Municipal Code my fence allegedly violates, so.I have no way to
ascertain for myself what the appropriate standard is. I am
especially concerned about this fact, given that the inspector
measured my fence from my neighbor's side- it seems highly
illogical to me that my compliance with the Building Code could be
affected by how high the dirt is in my neighbor's yard.
Additionally, the notice gives me an entirely unreasonable deadline
by which to correct the alleged violation. My copy of the notice
states that the alleged violation must be corrected within, five
days. This deadline was not written on the original copy of the
c;1~~. -J-
notice, but addedcto my copy later by the inspector. Given that I
have not even been given proper notice of either the standard my
fence must meet or the actions I must take to meet that standard,
five days is an impossible deadline for me to correct the alleged
violation.
Furthermore, the boilerplate language of the notice states a
different deadline than that added by the inspector. The notice
states that "The following corrections are to be made before
continuing with work." Currently, I am making no improvements to
my property, so it is not clear to me what "work" must be postponed
until I correct the alleged problem.
Recently, I have had poor relations with my neighbor on the east
side. Due to that fact and the unusual circumstances under which
this correction notice was issued, I am concerned that I may .have
been unfairly cited for this problem. I would trust the City of
Chula Vista to respond to baseless complaints from that neighbor in
a reasonable fashion- however, for the above reasons, I do not feel
that has occurred.
Accordingly, I am requesting that the City of Chula Vista rescind
this correction notice. All of my fences were found to be in
compliance with the Building Code twelve years ago, when my pool
was installed. since that time I have not altered those fences in
any way. The City may not now tell me that the fences are not in
compliance, when their own inspectors approved them twelve years
ago. Therefore, this correction notice was improperly issued and
should be rescinded immediately.
Thank you for your consideration of this matter. Please contact me
at 235-0281 if you have any questions regarding this letter.
Sincerely,
Maria Moya
222 E. Oneida
Chula vista
o~~, ~.:2~
,'~C'~~~11 'I' 1t"l""'l"!\'1'\"'rrT=\""'ii"'lf"\1mr:!f1:i'l1"",.....i\'l'~.,.1;Ji't.:r~:l"!V~ lIf'!11
CORRECTION NOTICE
CITY OF CHUlA VISTA
BUILDING DEPT.
Job Located at _ -Z 2_~L_;!:.. Dr'l--::l -I ~~
This Building Has Been Inspected and:
o VIOLATION - NO PERMIT
o FOUNDATION
o PLUMBING
o WIRING _
o FRAME i
o LATH
o MASONRY
o ROOFING
o ELECTRICAL FIXTURES
o FINAL INSPECTION
o SEPTIC TANK - CESSPOOL
o SEWER CONNECTION
tflj- OTHER
IS NOT ACCEPTED
THE FOLLOWING CORRECTIONS ARE TO BE
.
! MADE BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH WORK:
I. REM~RKS~.........-?__ D - CA5'- },J Q J
e;J .-' -t do.... A.l1 -f- '
c .\J. {,
~J7>
?;-(C;. 9r
j
j
DO NOT REMOVE THIS NOTICE '1
O~~- -;;-J
,
,
DATE
B-411
..,...' "', -,
-.( n
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item F}
Meeting Date 6/20/95
ITEM TITLE:
Select Recommendations from the Growth Manageme~ Oversight
Commission's 1994 Annual Budget Pertaining to the FY 1995-96 Budget
SUBMITTED BY:
Director of Planning
/
City Manager~ Iou
(4/5ths Vote: Yes_Nol)
REVIEWED BY:
On June 1, 1995, the GMOC finalized its 1994 Annual Report to the City Council. At that
meeting, the GMOC identified several of its recommendations which have the potential for
budget and/or staffing implications during the coming fiscal year (FY 1995-96). Since the
GMOC will not be able to meet in workshop with the Council to comprehensively review their
report until later July, they felt it was important that Council receive the report prior to closing
deliberations on the FY 1995-96 budget. As a result, they voted unanimously to immediately
forward the report, and their chairman, Tris Hubbard, prepared the attached transmittal letter
to the Mayor and Council outlining the budget related issues.
At this time, management staff of the affected departments (Public Works, Police, Fire, Library,
Planning) and Administration have had a brief opportunity to evaluate the budget implications
of the GMOC recommendations, and are providing the following report and recommended
follow-up actions.
RECOMMENDATION: That City Council accept this report, and direct staff to return with
a specific work program which addresses the proposed timing for responding to GMOC's
concerns, in conjunction with the City Council / GMOC workshop to be held in late July.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: See attached letter from Tris Hubbard,
Chairman of the GMOC.
DISCUSSION:
Since receiving the letter from the GMOC chairman on June 5, staff has only had the
opportunity to initially review and discuss the subject recommendations. Based on those
discussions, the following initial responses are provided to assist the Council's review of the
subject matters. For ease of reference, the responses are correspondingly numbered to the items
in the attached June 5, 1995, transmittal letter.
Jtj-/
Page 2, Item 11
Meeting Date 6/20/95
1.) CAD/RMS Svstem -
Staff of the Police and Fire Departments indicate that the CAD/RMS system is generally
moving forward as scheduled. Evaluation of responses to the Request For Proposal for
system installation should be completed by June, 1995. Selection of a vendor, and
related Council approval, could occur in July, 1995, depending upon funding.
With regard to funding, staff has identified alternative funding mechanisms, however,
it is still being evaluated internally in order to recommend options to the City Manager.
Then a proposal for possible inclusion of this project in the 1995 -96 CIP will be
formulated.
2.) Updated Master Plans for Police. Fire and Library Facilities -
Police- Police facilities are presently addressed as a component of the Civic Center
Master Plan. As recently indicated by the City Manager, and pursuant to the Civic
Center Master Plan, the near-term plan is for the existing police facility to remain at its
present location and be expanded. Therefore, the Police Department has not included
in its FY 1995-96 budget any staffing, funding or other provisions for commencing a
review/update of the present plan during the coming year.
Fire- The Fire Chief and City Administration have previously discussed, and concurred
on the need to undertake update of the Fire Station Master Plan. As initially discussed,
the effort was originally contemplated to be accomplished utilizing existing staff from
appropriate City departments including Fire, Administration, Planning, and Management
Services (P APE). Given this premise, the update effort was not viewed as a direct
budget appropriation item, but rather, more a work program consideration for potentially
affected departments in terms of staff availability, and prioritization among other already
scheduled major work efforts.
Subsequent to final action on the FY 1995-96 budget, staff of the potentially affected
departments will be preparing and finalizing their FY 1995-96 work plans. As part of
those efforts, it is envisioned that the noted departments would confer to scope and
develop a work program for the master plan update, to then be considered in relation to
their overall work plans for FY 1995-96. It should be noted, however, that given recent
initial FY 1995-96 budget actions regarding the Fire Department's Principal Management
Assistant position, and the elimination of P APE staff, the ability of staff to commence
such a master plan effort during FY 1995-96 may be in question. Any consideration of
the potential need to employ consultant services will be addressed in developing the
proposed work program, and subsequently presented to the Council.
/1--e2
Page 3, Item 11
Meeting Date 6/20/95
Librarv- Similar to the above, the Library Director indicates that general discussions
regarding the need to update the Library Master Plan, and possible funding sources, have
occurred with City Administration over the last year. No specific budget consideration
has been given, however, to commencing this effort during FY 1995-96.
From a FY 1995-96 work program perspective, the Library Director did indicate that
existing, budgeted staff were anticipated to prepare the "Library Strategic Plan" which
addresses the range of library services to be delivered over the next year, and how that
will be accomplished. Utilizing those existing staff, the Director has indicated that
development of a work program, along with staffing and funding needs, for conducting
the master plan update could be prepared. That work program could then be more fully
considered for commencement as part of the FY 1996-97 budget.
3.) H Street Traffic Evaluation- The City Traffic Engineer indicates that various studies
regarding the longer-term disposition of H Street's threshold performance have already
been conducted, and that sufficient information exists regarding the potential range of
remedial actions and their relative influence on threshold performance. Rather than
conduct additional studies as suggested, the City Traffic Engineer proposes that range of
existing information be packaged and presented to the GMOC as part of their upcoming
review to commence in October, 1995, with the intent that the GMOC make more
specific recommendations regarding potential remedial actions. Those recommendations
could then form the basis for further Council direction regarding which action(s) are
preferred.
4.) Drainage Monitoring- The Engineering Division indicates that the proposed 1995-96
Capital Improvement Program (CIP) includes project no. DR-l25, "Telegraph Canyon
Channel - Stream Flow Gauge" which would install a flow monitoring gauge in the
Telegraph Canyon Channel at Fifth Avenue. Implementation of the project is contingent
on Council's approval of the proposed 1995-96 CIP.
With respect to additional monitoring stations, the Engineering Division indicates that it
would make sense to also monitor Telegraph Canyon Channel and Poggi Canyon Channel
in the vicinity of Interstate-805. Evaluation of siting and installation of those stations
would occur in the future in conjunction with the review of the Otay Ranch project. It
was noted that to be of the most value, any monitoring to occur at those locations should
start prior to development of Otay Ranch.
SUMMARY
As discussed above, the various recommendations highlighted by the GMOC in their report do
appear to have significant implications for several department work programs, which will need
to be further evaluated once the overall staffing levels for those departments are determined in
/9-}
Page 4, Item !.i
Meeting Date 6/20/95
the FY 1995-96 budget process. Therefore, staff recommends that the City Council accept this
report, and direct staff to return in late July with a specific work program and schedule for the
above referenced projects, taking into account approved staffing levels and other priority
projects. This information could be considered by Council in conjunction with its joint
workshop with the GMOC, and specific direction could be given to staff at that time regarding
the scheduling of these projects.
FISCAL IMPACT: Staff will provide a specific fiscal impact analysis of these
recommendations in the follow-up report to be provided in July.
A TT ACHMENTS:
A - TRANSMITTAL LETTER FROM GMOC CHAIRMAN
B - GMOC 1994 ANNUAL REPORT AND COVER MEMO .-
C/.oO lVU< ~ ~~cu1 ~A'A
j;U~J .
(M:\HOME\PLANNING\ED\GMOCBUD .AII)
/9-'1
June 5, 1995
The Honorable Mayor and City Council
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Ave.
Chula Vista, CA. 91910
RE: Transmittal of the Growth Management Oversight Commission's (GMOC) 1994
Annual Report
Dear Mayor Horton and Council:
As you are likely aware, the GMOC's annual process to review compliance with the City's
growth management Threshold Standards is designed to present recommendations to you
in concert with your annual City budget considerations. Typically, and as is our preference,
we meet with you in a workshop setting to accomplish this.
Unfortunately, by circumstances beyond our control, our process did not commence in
October, and our report is now just becoming available to you. Since we understand that
a workshop meeting with you is not feasible until later July, we felt it imperative that we
immediately forward the report so it will be in your hands before your June 20, 1995,
meeting, and prior to closing your deliberations on the City's Fiscal Year 1995-96 budget.
The catalyst for doing so, is that four topics in our report are potentially of a budget
implicating nature, and we desire that you be aware of them. If Council completes action
on the budget without at least considering these, the GMOC feels it is conceivable that
action on any or all of them could be delayed for an entire year.
For the sake of quick reference, the four topics are outlined below. More complete
discussion and background is provided in respective sections of our 1994 Report which is
attached for reference:--
1) CAD/RMS Svstem - The GMOC views installation and operation of the CAD/RMS
system as one of the top priorities for the City. Management and reporting of
threshold compliance data are contingent on the CAD/RMS system for both the fire
and police departments. The GMOC understands that significant CIP funding and
other activities are necessary to meet with the projected Spring, 1996, operational
date. Since the system's operation is vital to addressing correction of police and
fire threshold non-compliance, the GMOC wants to ensure that appropriate CIP and
other considerations are made.
2) Uodated Master Plans for Police. Fire and Librarv Facilities - The GMOC is
recommending that these master plans be updated in FY 1995-96, specifically as
it relates to the extension of services to a significantly larger service area to include
the Eastlake, Salt Creek Ranch, San Miguel Ranch and Otay Ranch projects. In
the GMOC's viewpoint, the suggested preparation in the coming year is strategically
dq-5/J9-~
linked to the anticipated schedules for conducting major master planning activities
in and around those projects. The GMOC considers related detailed facility
planning for any of these projects without the benefit and guidance of
current/updated master plans to be putting the cart-before-the-horse.
3) H Street Traffic Evaluation - The GMOC is highly concerned with the existing
potential for increased traffic congestion on H Street, particularly west of 1-805
where widening could be constrained by existing development. Traffic projections
indicate that H Street will likely fail thresholds unless widening or other remedial
action occur in the future. We are recommending more detailed study and report
during FY '95-'96 regarding this imminent failure, so that the GMOC can advise on,
and Council can fully understand and exercise its options well before a problem
materializes.
4) Drainaae Monitorina - The GMOC has previously expressed concern over potential
impacts from extensive development in eastern Chula Vista upon older
infrastructure in the western area. As no empirical evidence exists as to these
potential impacts, we last year recommended the implementation of monitoring
stations. Given our understanding that such are technically feasible, we desire a
study to determine where they would best be placed, so that a CIP may be
developed for their future installation. Such a study should be conducted in the
coming year, since acquisition and installation will take additional time beyond that.
Our report contains numerous other recommendations, and we still strongly desire to meet
with you in a July workshop session to thoroughly review those. Perhaps transmittal of our
report at this time will also afford you additional advance opportunity in preparation for the
workshop.
The GMOC has always been greatly appreciative of the attention afforded it by the Council.
We take our charge seriously, and hope this communication is of value to you, despite its
timing. If I can be of any assistance in the aforementioned matters, please feel free to
contact me.
-
Sincerely;
CIk[;V
Tris H'~:;(
Chairman, GMOC
cc: Ed Batchelder
(GMOC-94\CC6-20.L TR)
-2-
) 9 - '} /19 - 2
MEMORANDUM
June 7, 1995
TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Couilcil
FROM: The Growth Management Oversight Commission
SUBJECT: 1994 GMOC ANNUAL REPORT
The Citizen's of Chula Vista are fortunate to have past and present community leadership that
maintains procedures, policies and monitoring for community service thresholds to assure
quality of life standards.
The GMOC is pleased to report to Council that in 1994, threshold compliance was met in 8 of
the 11 service areas as follows:
Libraries
Drainage
Sewer
Fiscal
Water
Schools
Traffic
Parks & Recreation
The thresholds for which compliance was not fully achieved are:
Police
Fire/EMS
Air Quality
In addition to these basic findings, the accompanying 1994 Annual Report addresses a variety
of relevant issues in each of the threshold standard areas. In brief summary, those are:
SCHOOLS
While school thresholds have technically been met, many of the schools, particularly
west of 1-805, continue to operate above capacity. A total of 584 elementary students
were being bused within the district during 1994. No schools are scheduled to be built
in the west, and only Feaster School is projected for expansion to alleviate the
overcrowded schools west of the 1-805. The Elementary District will add new schools
in the east through Mello-Roos Community Facilities Districts that are in place, or
planned.
Given that SB 1066 threatens to take away full mitigation costs for school construction,
and that a recent ruling that relocatable classrooms 20 years or older count against
districts in calculating eligibility for state funding, the outlook for state supported school
;Y
19 ~ I
building funding is clouded. Solutions to school building construction will therefore be
dependent on several avenues:
1) Defeat or modification of SB 1066;
2) That the City Council and Boards of Education jointly consider an equitable
method for providing full mitigation for development projects;
3) That the City support legislation lowering general obligation bonds from 2/3 to
simple majority;
4) That Districts begin employment of innovative school scheduling, such as multi-
track, to increase existing facility capacity.
LIBRARY
The 1995 completion of the 37,000 square foot South Chula Vista Library assures
compliance to the Library threshold through the year 2000. The Library Board will be
examining the impact of new technologies on future library service delivery in the next
two years.
DRAINAGE
Thanks to completion of several drainage projects, it was reported to the GMOC that
fewer drainage problems occurred in 1994 than in the previOUS two years. The GMOC
remains concemed, however, with the large list of needed but unfunded drainage
projects in westem Chula Vista, and therefore recommends an effort to continue funding
a portion of the list each year so that serious problems do not develop for lack of
preventive maintenance.
SEWER
The GMOC notes that the Engineering Department's sewer monitoring program is
providing valuable information to predict problem areas, and strongly advocates
continued staffing and funding for the sewer monitoring program. Current waste water
disposal contracts will adequately carry the city through 2004, however, it is
recommended that the Council continue to actively support staff in the exploration and
development of a wastewater reclamation project here in the South Bay, as a long-
range solution to waste disposal and self-sufficient water management.
TRAFFIC
The City Traffic Engineering Division has done a commendable job monitoring traffic
corridors that were of concern to the GMOC in its 1993 report. While thresholds have
been met for 1994, the GMOC remains concerned with regard to "H" Street and SR-
125. As growth continues, "H" Street has the potential of not meeting current traffic
threshold standards due to the limitations of solutions to modify "H" Street to increase
traffic capacity. The alternatives to widening would be to curtail growth and/or live with
a lowered level of service during peak traffic hours. SR-125 freeway project is needed
to help alleviate eastlwest traffic to the 1-805 from the EastLake and Otay Project areas.
The GMOC is concerned that the Interim Facility Plan (HNTB) will not satisfactorily meet
traffic demands of already approved eastem area developments .
~ /9-lfJ
FISCAL
Fiscal thresholds are met, and the GMOC perceives that staff is projecting expenditures
and income based on the continuation of recession and possible state budget cuts to
balance the budget, and continue with current levels of service.
WATER
The GMOC is impressed with the effort of the Water Agencies, and with the cooperative
effort of the Agencies and the City staff to meet community water service needs. In
addition, the development of continuing plans for sharing of water resources, the
delivery of water in spite of planned or unplanned emergencies, and in increased
storage, assures the expectation of meeting future water needs. The GMOC
encourages the City to support efforts to develop local water treatment projects to
reduce dependence on importation.
PARKS AND RECREATION
While the GMOC notes that the Parks and ReCreation Department has met the
threshold standard, the majority of last year's recommendations are still outstanding as
they are contingent on the completion of the Parks Implementation Plan (PIP) and
related work efforts. There is concern since the PIP has been promised for a number
of years but has yet to be completed and adopted. Therefore, the GMOC highly
recommends that the PIP be brought to Council for review and approval by the Fall of
1995 so that it will be available for consideration in the next GMOC review cycle. The
GMOC is pleased to note that a draft of a revised Parks and Recreation threshold which
would apply city-wide has been created. The GMOC conceptually endorses this draft,
and based on the relationship of information in the PIP to the possible structure and
content of a final standard, recommends that Council direct staff to finalize the draft for
pUblic hearing and Council adoption by Fall, 1995, in conjunction with the PIP.
POLICE
While the Police threshold standard has not been met for Priority I calls for service, the
deficiency was only 2.2% below the standard. In addition, Priority II call thresholds were
met. The GMOC encourages Council to support the completion of the CAD/RMS
system which will assist with managing and monitoring police services. The GMOC
commends the Police Department and City for developing and supporting volunteer
policing programs.
The GMOC encourages the Council to direct the Department to update the City Civic
Center Master Plan as it relates to police services, and more specifically as it relates
to a significantly larger service .area due to the EastLake, San Miguel Ranch, Salt Creek
Ranch and Otay Ranch developments.
~7~//
FIRE
While the GMOC finds that the Fire/EMS threshold has not been met, the deficiency
appears to be related to a change in the manner of collecting and reporting response
time. The GMOC encourages Council to support the completion of the CAD/RMS
system which will assist the Department with managing and monitoring services. The
GMOC also encourages Council to direct staff to update the City's Fire Station Master
Plan specifically with regard to serving a significantly larger service area with the
addition of the EastLake, San Miguel Ranch, Salt Creek Ranch and Clay Ranch
communities.
AIR QUALITY
While regional air quality continues to improve, with the APCD noting that 1994 is the
cleanest year on record, state and federal standards have not yet been met, and the
GMOC again recommends issuance of a Statement of Concem.
Notwithstanding this concem, the GMOC is pleased to note that the Federal EPA has
downgraded the San Diego Region's smog classification from severe to serious. The
downgrade has direct local impact on less stringent smog control requirements for
business and industry that will help our economy, and will not affect health standards.
SUGGESTED REVISIONS TO THE ANNUAL GMOC REVIEW PROCESS
At staff request, GMOC considered possible conversion of our annual review process
to a "checklist" format similar to that employed by SANDAG in conducting compliance
reviews with the Regional Growth Management Strategy (RGMS). We reviewed the
Checklist report required by SANDAG. It was the conclusion of the GMOC that
conversion to such a process could be beneficial, provided that the depth, breadth and
material value of our annual review effort is not. lessened or compromised. The
conversion should help to streamline the process by integrating the two efforts. The
GMOC recommends that staff prepare such a checklist for review and use in the
conduct of future annual GMOC threshold reviews.
Sincerely;
€i5cr
Chairman, GMOC
(GMOC-MIRPT-COVR.MEM)
r
1/~/;2
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION
1994 REPORT
SUBMITTED
JUNE 1995
/9 ~ / }
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION
1994 REPORT
Commission Members
Tris Hubbard, Chairman (Education)
Elizabeth Allen, Vice Chairman (Montgomery)
Will T. Hyde (Environmental)
Chuck Peter (Business)
John Ray (Planning Commission)
Mike Armbrust (Center City)
James Kell (Eastern Territories)
C. Lynn Dull (Sweetwater)
-vacant- (Development)
Staff
Edgar Batchelder, Senior Planner
June 1995
/t//1
TABLE OF CONTENTS
TODie
Introduction
Process
Development Forecasts
Threshold/Annual Review Summary
Annual Review of Thresholds
Thresholds Reflectina Non-Comoliance
Police
Fire
Air Quality
Thresholds Reflectina Comoliance
Libraries
Sewer
Drainage
Fiscal
Water
Schools
Traffic
Parks and Recreation
Additional Proposed Actions
Revisions to the Annual Review Process
Expanded Development Phasing/Monitoring Policies
Paae
1
2
2
4
5
8
10
14
15
18
19
22
26
31
35
38
39
)9//~
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix
A. Police Department Memorandum
B. Fire Department Memorandum
C. APCD Communications
D. Draft Revised Air Quality Threshold Standard
E. Library Memorandum
F. Engineering Sewer and Drainage Report
G. Finance Department Memorandum
H. Water District Communications
GMOC Letter of Commendation
I. School District Communications
J. Engineering Traffic Reports
K. Parks and Recreation Department Memorandum
L. Draft Revised Parks and Recreation Threshold Standard
M. Interim Development Forecast Report
N. Draft Development Phasing/Monitoring Policy
/9r/t
GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION
1994 REPORT
June 5, 1995
INTRODUCTION
In November 1987, through the input of citizens and developers, the City Council adopted
the Threshold/Standards Policy for Chula Vista. The Policy addresses eleven public
facilities and services, and each is discussed in terms of a goal, objectives, "threshold" or
standard, and implementation measures. The Standards form the backbone of an overall
growth management program for the City which has evolved since 1987 through adoption
of a Growth Management Element of the General Plan in 1989, and a Growth Management
Program document and Implementing Ordinance in 1991. Adherence to these Citywide
Standards is intended to preserve and enhance both the environment and residents'
quality-of-life as growth occurs.
To provide an independent annual City-wide Threshold/Standards compliance review, a
Growth Management Oversight Committee (GMOC) was created. The GMOC was
originally appointed by the City Council in the summer of 1988. It is composed of nine
members representing a geographical balance of residents as well as a cross section of
interests including education, environment, business and development. There is also
representation from the City Planning Commission. In April of 1991, the City Council
changed the designation of the Committee to a full City Commission.
In conducting its annual review, the GMOC's responsibilities include the following:
a determination of whether the thresholds have been complied with on both a
project and cumulative basis over the prior year;
whether compliance is likely to be maintained based on both short-term and long-
term development forecasts;
whether each threshold is appropriate for its goal;
whether any new thresholds should be adopted for any issues;
whether any issues should be added to or deleted from the threshold group;
whether the City has been using developer fees for the intended purpose;
what the fiscal impact of threshold compliance may be; and
whether the means of compliance are appropriate and being achieved.
Development projects in Chula Vista are required to demonstrate that the Threshold
Standards will be maintained as growth occurs. Each project is reviewed, and
appropriately conditioned to assure that needed facilities and services are in place in
advance of, or concurrent with, proposed development. This requirement promotes the
continuation of a high quality-of-life for existing as well as future City residents.
~
/9 - /?
PROCESS
The Growth Management Oversight Commission (GMOC) held a series of 10 meetings
from December 1994 through May 1995. The Commission spent the first meeting
reviewing the City Council's actions on their 1993 Annual Report and recommendations,
and in reviewing the established thresholds, Commission responsibilities, and the status
of City-wide development as an orientation. The next 7 meetings were spent reviewing
threshold reports submitted by both individual City departments and external agencies, and
in determining the status of compliance. Presentations were made by representatives of
the Sweetwater and Otay water districts, Chula Vista Elementary and Sweetwater Union
High School Districts, the San Diego County Air Pollution Control District, and City staff
including Public Works, Traffic Engineering, Parks and Recreation, Library, Fire, Police,
Finance, and Planning. The GMOC also reviewed whether or not it was appropriate to
issue a "statement of concern" or to make other recommendations regarding each
threshold. Following completion of the individual threshold reviews, the GMOC prepared,
reviewed and adopted this annual report to the Planning Commission and City Council.
The GMOC's review is structured around a fiscal year cycle. The intent is to accommodate
City Council consideration of GMOC recommendations which may have budget
implications. The official review period for this report is July 1, 1993 through June 30,
1994, although pertinent issues identified during the second half of 1994 and early 1995
are also addressed as necessary. The next GMOC review period is scheduled to begin
in October, 1995, and will address the period from July 1, 1994 through June 30, 1995.
DEVELOPMENT FORECASTS
The Threshold/Standards Policy calls for the City to prepare both short-range (12 to 18
month) and mid-range (5 to 7 years) development forecasts at the beginning of the annual
GMOC review process. Complimentary to threshold performance evaluation, which
reviews the prior year period, these forecasts serve to provide a common basis by which
the GMOC, staff and external agencies can identify and address any potential threshold
issues before a problem arises. This year's forecast report was substantially abbreviated
in comparison to prior years due mainly to a prolonged schedule in the completion of
SANDAG's Series 8 Regional Forecast. SANDAG's forecast data has become increasingly
integral to local forecasting efforts as the City has adjusted its methodology to be more
cognizant of sub-regional development patterns which could influence infrastructure and
services within the City's Planning Area. This is particularly true of major transportation
facilities such as SR125. A copy of the abbreviated forecast report is included as
Appendix M.
//'l-/fr
12-18 Month Forecast
Similar to last year, and in response to the ongoing recession and related economic
climate, the forecast figures consist of a range with a low end and high end. The low end
is based primarily on a 30-month trend analysis of prior construction activity beginning in
1992, and forecasts 891 housing starts and 909 completions over the 18 month period
from July 1994 through December 1995. The high end forecast primarily reflects the local
development community's anticipated construction schedules, and projects 1,870 housing
starts and 1.741 completions over the same period. The somewhat large variant between
the high and low figures reflects the continued slow pace of recessionary recovery, and the
related lack of consumer confidence for major purchases such as homes. By comparison,
residential development activity levels in both 1993 and 1994 were about one half of
average annual levels experienced during the mid- to later 1980's when development was
strong. In general, most current economic thinking indicates that the housing market will
not recover until about 1997, and then not to the growth rate levels seen in the latter
1980's.
5-7 Year Forecast
As noted earlier, the City's intent in coordinating the mid-range (5-7 year) forecast with
SANDAG's Series 8, is to further improve forecasting methodology consistent with the
regional and sub-regional models, and to allow for easier and more consistent updates of
these forecasts. In doing so, the same assumptions utilized in the Series 8 Interim
Forecast for projecting future growth and development in the region are applied locally to
the City's forecast. These assumptions include, but are not limited to, population and
economic trends, and infrastructure needs.
Because the Series 8 Interim model considers the remaining development potential of all
lands, both vacant and infill, within the greater San Diego Region and its subregions, local
facility planning efforts can benefit from the City's forecast being linked to it. This linkage
enables consideration of all projects within and adjacent to our Planning Area, and the
ability to more accurately anticipate long-range public facility needs, and to address
necessary preplanning by the development community in concert with the policies of the
City and other affected government agencies.
Similar to the 12-18 month forecast, a low and high-end range were again used. City-wide,
during the next five to seven years, the average annual number of dwelling units
anticipated for construction ranges from a low of 910 to a high of 1.510. The high end
figure reflects increased activity expected in the latter years of the forecast (post 1997)
associated with a general shift in county-wide development patterns, and the projected
commencement of construction in Otay Ranch. This forecast also takes into consideration
known facility capacity limitations, particularly those related to traffic circulation such as
State Route 125.
While a majority of the forecast is attributable to growth in eastern Chula Vista, the above
figures include approximately 100 dwelling units per year of infill development in western
Chula Vista based primarily on an analysis of historic trends.
~ /C;/) I
1.
2.
ISSUE
Police
Fire/EMS
3.
Air Quality
4. Libraries
6.
5. Sewer
7.
Drainage
Fiscal
8. Water
a. Sweetwater Authority
b. Otay Water District
9. Schools
a. Chula Vista Elementary
b. Sweetwater Union High
10. Traffic
11. Parks and Recreation
...........
~
~
\:\
1994
THRESHOLD STANDARDS - ANNUAL REVIEW SUMMARY
THRESHOLD
COMPLIANCE
MET
POTENTIAL
FOR NON-
COMPLIANCE
STATEMENT OF
CONCERN TO
RESPONSIBLE
AGENCY TO
ACHIEVE
COMPLIANCE
i1~'lil~jflffI1!jlIIII11111ll Jtit@ff~l~t111~tl)11Iilt~l!jtj
Itfl$l;iGf;i!lila"
Ilt..i}li~t'lltt~
4
ADOPT AND
FUND TACTICS
TO ACHIEVE
COMPLIANCE
POTENTIAL
THRESHOLD
CHANGE
RECOMMEND
:lil~*II. .
11Illt~IIIJ.ltlll\~{lif'
-ANNUAL REVIEW OF THRESHOLDS-
THRESHOLDS REFLECTING NON-COMPLIANCE OR STATEMENTS OF CONCERN
a POLICE -
THE GMOC FINDS THAT THE CITY IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE POLICE
THRESHOLD STANDARD FOR PRIORITY I CFS. ALTHOUGH THE SHORTFALL
WAS SLIGHT. AND PERFORMANCE IS IMPROVING DESPITE INCREASING
WORKLOAD. THE CITY SHOULD CONTINUE TO CLOSELY MONITOR THIS
THRESHOLD IN THE NEAR FUTURE. STANDARDS FOR PRIORITY II CFS
WERE MET AND EXCEEDED.
As reported in the past, the Police Department has been implementing a variety of
operational and managerial changes since its present administration took over in
1991. Many of those changes are designed to improve call-for-service (CFS)
response performance, and intended to address non-conformance with the Police
Threshold Standard. The Police Department is to be commended for their ever-
improving performance and continuing efforts, including new and substantial focus
to community based proactive policing. However, despite continuing improvement
in performance, the Department did not achieve full conformance with the threshold
standard for the fourth consecutive year. While both measures for Priority II Calls
for Service (CFS) were met, only one of the two measures for Priority I CFS was
met as follows:
Priority I Calls for Service (PI CFS)-
The threshold for Priority I (emergency) CFS requires that 84% of these calls
be responded to within 7 minutes, with an average response time of 4.5
minutes or less measured annually. The actual performance for FY 1993-94
indicates that 85.4% of all Priority I calls were responded to within 7 minutes,
but with an average response time of 4.6 minutes (2.2% below the standard).
As a measure of continuing improvement, performance figures for FY '92-'93
were 84.2% of PI CFS within 7 minutes, with an average response time of
4.7 minutes, and for FY '91-'92,81.2% with an average time of 4.9 minutes.
Priority II Calls for Service (PII CFS)-
The threshold for Priority II (urgent) CFS requires that 62% of these calls be
responded to within 7 minutes, with an average response time of 7 minutes
or less measured annually. The actual performance for FY 1993-94
indicates that 63.5% of all PII CFS were responded to within 7 minutes, with
an average response time of 6.48 minutes.
~9/J )
Although the data indicates that the threshold for PII CFS is again being met,
it evidences a slight deterioration from FY '92-'93 when 64.2% of PII CFS
were responded to within 7 minutes, with an average time of 6.33 minutes.
While the GMOC considers the PI CFS shortfall to be a modest deficiency, we
none-the-Iess remain concerned since this is fourth consecutive year in which Police
performance has been very near, but below, the minimum acceptable standard.
The GMOC observes that CFS volumes continue to increase annually, however, the
rate of increase appears to have slowed from 5 to 9% annually over the 1990-93
period to just 1.3% from FY '92-'93 to FY '93-'94. In spite of this change, CFS
volumes appear to continue to slightly outpace added resources in trying to meet
the PI CFS threshold.
It is difficult for the GMOC to pinpoint causes and/or recommend remedial actions,
as no conclusive evidence exists to indicate that threshold deficiency is attributable
to' growth. The Department continues to indicate that the present record keeping
systems do not enable data management in a fashion which can readily quantify
whether increases in CFS are growth related.
Without appropriate records to monitor increased CFS within the City, it is difficult
for the Police Department and the GMOC to determine whether threshold
performance issues will continue to exist. It is also difficult to determine how best
to structure and manage police resources in combating crime and maintaining
appropriate service levels. In these regards, the Department continues to
emphasize the importance of installing the Computer Aided Dispatch and Records
Management System (CAD/RMS), which would also serve the Fire Department.
The GMOC understands that as of the preparation of this report, a vendor will have
been selected, and that the initial components of the system will be installed and
operational by Spring, 1996. Given the importance of the proposed CAD/RMS
system to the future of managing police service and response times, the GMOC
recommends:
. That the City Council continue to assist and support the
projected (Spring, 1996) date of completion of the CADIRMS
system through funding allocation and other related efforts.
If only existing techniques/systems remain in place, the GMOC foresees
continuation of the present inability to identify and quantify growth's impacts on the
delivery of police services. As noted last year, once better data is available, re-
evaluation of the threshold standard is warranted. In order to produce worthwhile
indicators and/or measurable results for use in the reevaluation, it is anticipated that
at least one year of CAD/RMS statistics will be necessary to determine if current
issues influencing police performance can be solved through managerial
techniques, or if an alteration of the current Standard is warranted. Therefore, the
GMOC recommends:
~
17~..2;2,
. That re-evaluation of the Police Threshold Standard occur
approximately one year subsequent to the implementation of the
CAD/RMS system. Assuming the CAD/RMS is in place by Spring
1996 (as presently scheduled), then the GMOC would consider
the threshold standard for revision in their annual review
commencing October, 1997.
Beyond the CAD/RMS proposal, the Police Department should be recognized and
commended for continuing to expand on a multi-faceted proactive policing effort
under the well-grounded philosophy that it is more effective in the long run to
prevent crime than to respond to calls-for-service. In this light, the GMOC
recommends:
. That the City Council support continuing expansion of
community policing efforts and programs such as the School
Resource Officer, the Citizens Adversity Support Team, Senior
Volunteer Patrol, and Community Resource Officers.
Given the record of continuing CFS increase, and growing fiscal constraints to
significantly expanding the police force, the GMOC believes that this emphasis to
proactive, crime preventative policing may be the only practical answer to
maintaining police thresholds over the longer term.
Toward ensuring long-term efficient delivery of adequate polices services to our
growing community, the GMOC has become aware ofthe impending need to re-visit
the City's master plan for police facilities. Several large projects in eastern Chula
Vista will be undergoing major planning activities over the next year, among them
Otay Ranch. As the City grows and expands to the east and south, it is becoming
increasingly necessary to consider how best to deliver services to those extending
geographic areas in an efficient and timely manner. In addition, land planning
decisions/strategies for these major projects could have a direct impact on the
future structure, location and timing for establishing police facilities and presence
in eastern Chula Vista, and therefore, should not be made without the benefit and
guidance of an updated police facilities master plan. This is particularly true for
determining methods through which police presence will be projected within the
Otay Ranch project. Therefore, the GMOC recommends:
. That an effort to update the City's master plan for police facilities
(which are presently addressed as part of the City's Civic Center
Master Plan) be commenced, and possibly completed, during
fiscal year 1995-96. The GMOC believes that such a schedule is
logical and beneficial given the present timing for completing
master plan reviews for developments in eastern Chula Vista
such as Eastlake, San Miguel Ranch and Otay Ranch during
1995-96.
//~-:J}
Taken together, the Department projects that the collection of present efforts will
result in further response time improvements, and attainment of threshold
compliance for the next reporting period (July 1, 1994 through June 3D, 1995).
CI FIRE/EMS -
THE GMOC FINDS THAT THE CITY IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE
FIRE/EMS THRESHOLD STANDARD. IT APPEARS. HOWEVER. THAT THIS
NON-COMPLIANCE IS A REFLECTION OF A CHANGE IN THE MANNER OF
DATA COLLECTION. AND NOT A REDUCTION OF FIRE SERVICE LEVELS FOR
FISCAL YEAR 1993-94.
The threshold standard requires that 85% of all emergency fire and medical calls
be responded to within 7 minutes. Response statistics presented for Fiscal Year
1993-94 indicate that only 80% of all emergency calls were responded to within 7
minutes (5% less than the standard). 85% of the calls were responded to within 7
minutes, 26 seconds (26 seconds over standard). Similar to last year, this apparent
non-compliance continues to result from statistical inconsistencies in the manner in
which the present automated system records total call response time, as compared
to the threshold standard's present structure regarding the three major components
of response time: Dispatch time; Turnout time; and Travel time. Therefore, the
GMOC again concludes that it does not have before it statistical performance
measurements consistent with the threshold's present structure.
As stated last year, in July, 1992, new communications equipment was installed in
the Dispatch Center. The system now captures the actual total dispatch time,
including the call intake component. The resulting effect to threshold performance
measurement is that available statistics now include time factors in the overall
response time statistics which were not included when the current threshold
standard was established in 1987. The present standard allocates a flat 30
seconds for call dispatch, not the actual time for call intake and disDatch as is now
being recorded. This could be adding 20 to 60 seconds to overall response times
per call, and cause the statistical non-compliance indicated above. The Fire
Department emphasized that turnout and travel times remain largely unchanged
from prior years, illustrating that delivery of fire and emergency medical services has
not deteriorated.
Toward correcting the inconsistency, the Fire Department reiterates that the present
dispatch system is not technically capable of separating out the call intake and
dispatch components, and as with the Police Department, is anxiously awaiting
purchase and installation of the CAD/RMS system. As the GMOC understands it,
the CAD/RMS system will provide a wealth of operational and managerial
enhancements which will directly benefit overall response times, including the ability
to statistically separate all components of overall response time, and for the first
~
/7-02;/
time, allow the direct evaluation of growth's impacts on the delivery of services.
Given the significance the CAD/RMS system, the GMOC recommends:
. That the City Council continue to support the scheduled Spring,
1996 installation of the CAD/RMS system which will improve
services, and enable the Fire Department to evaluate its
response time performance in correcting present statistical
inconsistencies, and in determining whether any changes to the
Threshold Standard are needed.
The GMOC re-emphasizes its understanding that if only existing systems remain in
place, there will be a continuation of the present inability to evaluate threshold
performance consistent with the provisions of the current standard. Given the
aforementioned beneficial information the CAD/RMS system will provide, the GMOC
also recommends:
. That a comprehensive review of the Fire Threshold be
undertaken approximately one year subsequent to
implementation of the CAD/RMS system. It is anticipated that at
least one year of CAD/RMS statistics will be necessary in
resolving present measurement inconsistencies, and in
determining if any alteration of the current standard is warranted.
Assuming the CAD/RMS system is in place by the end of 1995,
the GMOC would consider the threshold standard for revision in
their annual review commencing October, 1997.
An additional topic to be raised this year regards the apparent need to update the
City's Fire Station Master Plan. Similar to issues raised under the Police
discussion, the GMOC recognizes that several large projects in eastern Chula Vista
will be undergoing major planning activities during the next year. This includes
remaining areas of Eastlake and disposition of the interim fire station presently sited
in their business park, as well as neighboring San Miguel Ranch and Otay Ranch.
As the City grows and expands to the east and south, it is becoming increasingly
necessary to consider how best to deliver services to those extending geographic
areas in an efficient and timely manner. In addition, land planning
decisions/strategies for these major projects could have a direct impact on the
future structure, location and timing of the fire service network in eastern Chula
Vista, and therefore, should not be made without the benefit and guidance of an
updated Fire Station Master Plan. Therefore, the GMOC recommends:
. That an effort to update the City's Fire Station Master Plan be
commenced, and possibly completed, during fiscal year 1995-96.
The GMOC believes that such a schedule is logical and beneficial
given the present timing for completing master plan reviews for
developments in eastern Chula Vista such as Eastlake, San
Miguel Ranch and Otay Ranch during 1995-96.
/ ICj-;2~
a AIR QUALITY -
THE GMOC FINDS THAT AMBIENT AIR QUALITY WITHIN THE REGION
CONTINUES TO IMPROVE. AS EVIDENCED BY SMOG TRENDS DATA IN
APCD'S ANNUAL REPORT. AND THAT WITH THE RECENT FEDERAL EPA
RECLASSIFICATION OF SAN DIEGO COUNTY'S AIR QUALITY RATING FROM
"SEVERE" TO "SERIOUS". THE REGION IS PROJECTED TO MEET FEDERAL
AIR QUALITY STANDARDS BY 1999. STATE STANDARDS ARE MORE
STRINGENT. AND A PROJECTED COMPLIANCE DATE IS NOT PRESENTLY
KNOWN.
DESPITE THESE IMPROVEMENTS. HOWEVER. THE REGION STILL DOES NOT
MEET STATE AND FEDERAL STANDARDS FOR AIR QUALITY. AND
THEREFORE. THE GMOC FINDS THAT ISSUANCE OF A STATEMENT OF
CONCERN IS APPROPRIATE.
The Air Pollution Control District (APCD) again provided the GMOC with numerous
written materials and a thorough oral report. The materials consisted of various
handouts on local pollution sources, violators and enforcement actions in Chula
Vista during 1994, a list of APCD's 1994 accomplishments, APCD's 1993 Annual
Report on air quality and 1994 Scorecard, information on the San Diego Region's
smog reclassification, and the February 1995 AirNews publication. APCD is
presently preparing a triennial update on progress in implementing the Regional Air
Quality Strategy (RAQS) which should be available for the GMOC's next review
cycle.
The San Diego Region again continued to experience improvement in overall air
quality. For the San Diego Air Basin, 1994 was the cleanest air quality year on
record. As a yardstick, the following table illustrates improvements since 1990:
San Diego Region
Chula Vista
39
3
14
1
9
o
The APCD noted that Chula Vista enjoys some of the best air quality in the region.
~~ /.2C-
Despite improvements, however, an acceptable level of air quality for the San Diego
region has not yet been achieved. The APCD indicates that the most significant
. future air quality improvements will result from programs addressing mobile sources
(such as automobiles) through strong public transit and other efforts. The region's
largest air quality problem continues to be too many vehicle trips/miles driven. The
number of miles driven per year continues to grow at a rate almost double that of
population growth, and motor vehicles account for about 64% of the region's smog-
forming emissions.
In this regard, the APCD emphasized a significant new program under the Regional
Air Quality Strategy (RAQS) which is on the horizon for Chula Vista and other cities;
the Indirect Source Program. The program's focus is to review more significant land
use planning efforts to ensure that they foster reduction in automobile usage
(vehicle miles traveled). APCD cited Otay Ranch as an example of a large project
which promotes "villages" and mixed use to reduce automobile usage. APCD's
initial focus under the Indirect Source Program will be two fold; (1) review of large,
regionally significant municipal projects, and (2) requests that cities review, and as
necessary amend, their general plans and any other land use policies to reduce
vehicle miles traveled (VMT's). Examples would be promotion of mixed use, and
transit-oriented development concepts such as those proposed under
redevelopment concepts for the 'E' and 'H' Street trolley station areas. A draft of
an Indirect Source Reduction Program will be ready for review by Winter, 1995.
That program will propose establishment of local regulations and conditions
regarding the siting and approval of land uses which are traffic intensive.
Several other significant matters were addressed in APCD's presentation regarding
last year's Statement of Concern, and the current activities of APCD as they may
affect the City in the future, as follows:
1) The Federal EPA downgraded the San Diego Region's smog classification
from "severe" to "serious". The downgrade has a direct impact on local air
quality programs, actually resulting in a lessening or elimination of some
proposed requirements such as employer trip reduction programs under the
Transportation Control Measures plan.
The downgrade recognizes that a portion of the region's air pollution (smog)
is transported from Los Angeles. Transport was the cause for exceeding
State standards on 51 (57%) of the 90 days the region was non-complying
in 1993. Data for 1994 was not yet available. The APCD indicates that
meteorologically, the Los Angeles area will always affect our region's air
quality.
2) The APCD submitted a State Implementation Plan (SIP) reVISion
demonstrating that currently adopted control measures under the umbrella
of the RAQS are sufficient to provide attainment of federal ozone (smog)
standards in San Diego County by 1999. The SIP revision also revised the
/)9-.27
15% Rate-of-Progress Plan originally submitted in 1993 to correct
deficiencies identified by EPA, and prevented the imposition of sanctions.
3) In November 1994, the District adopted Rule 27 (Mobile Source Emission
Reduction Credit) enabling businesses to offset new or increased emissions
from stationary sources with credits from reducing mobile sources. Such
credits include scrapping old higher pollution cars, purchasing low-emissions
transit buses, purchasing zero-emission (electric) vehicles, or retrofitting
existing vehicles. In keeping with this more business-friendly approach, the
District is also providing more assistance to companies in their compliance
with standards, rather than simply issuing violation notices.
4) The District continues with the Vehicle Registration Funds Program whose
revenues derive from the DMV's collection of a $2.00 registration fee on
motor vehicles. The proceeds are then made available to fund alternate
transportation efforts. The City received the largest share of monies under
the last funding cycle, and applied the funds toward establishing the two
telecommuting centers, and purchasing a compressed natural gas fueled van
and electric parking enforcement vehicles.
5) In June, 1994, the District established the Border Vehicle Task Force to
address issues involved with implementing AB2008, which extends emission
control requirements to Mexican vehicles used in commuting to work in
California. It is comprised of those local, county, state and federal agencies,
and other interests who would most likely be involved in implementing the
program.
The GMOC also discussed proposed draft revisions to the Air Quality Threshold
Standard presented by staff in response to last year's recommendations. The
revisions address prior APCD comments that the present standard is dysfunctional
in its call for APCD to review the City's 12-18 month growth forecast and provide
comments regarding that forecast's impacts on current and future air quality
management programs. By law, APCD relies on SANDAG's regional growth
forecasts for their air quality planning and monitoring efforts. The GMOC and the
APCD concur that the draft (as presented in Appendix D) appears well-reasoned
and innovative, and forms a workable and logical foundation for annual
progress/compliance reporting on air quality improvements efforts at the local and
regional level. Therefore:
. The GMOC supports the proposed draft revised threshold
standard presented in Appendix D which has been initially
reviewed and supported by the APCD.
. Based on that review and support, the GMOC recommends that
the City Council endorse the draft revised air quality threshold
standard, and direct staff to finalize the revision with the APCD
and SANDAG and return with the necessary resolution and
ordinance for formal public hearing and adoption in Summer,
1995.
y //~~Y
In response to GMOC questions, the APCD also addressed funding prospects for
mass transit projects, and in particular, light-rail projects such as that proposed with
the Otay Ranch. They expressed doubts that funding for materializing the light-rail
line would become available, citing a number of revenue issues and anticipated cuts
at both the state and federal level. Movement appears to be toward less expensive
alternatives such as electiclbattery operated transit vehicles. The GMOC
understands that the present General Development Plan for the Otay Ranch
specifies a mass transit corridor exclusive to light-rail, and that approved densities
are dependant upon that corridor being so developed. Given the uncertain outlook
for future light-rail funding, and as advocated by the APCD, the GMOC
recommends:
. That the City work with the Otay Ranch developer and the
Metropolitan Transit Development Board (MTDB) to evaluate
redesignation of the project's mass transit cooridor to other than
sole limitation to light-rail as is presently stated in the Otay
Ranch plan.
~ )1':2;
ISSUES WHERE THRESHOLDS ARE MET
a LIBRARIES -
THE GMOC FINDS THAT THE CITY IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE LIBRARY
THRESHOLD BASED ON THE OPENING OF THE SOUTH CHULA VISTA
LIBRARY IN APRIL. 1995. GIVEN GROWTH AND POPULATION PROJECTIONS.
COMPLIANCE WILL BE MAINTAINED AT LEAST THROUGH THE YEAR 2000.
The threshold standard for libraries requires that 500 square feet of library space
(adequately equipped and staffed) be provided per each 1,000 population. Based
on an estimated City population of 150,252 as of June 30, 1994, a total of 75,126
square feet of library space is required. As of that date, 67,329 square feet was
available through the Chula Vista Public Library at 365 "F" Street with 55,000
square feet, the Eastlake Library at 1120 Eastlake Parkway with 10,000 square feet,
and a combined 2,329 square feet in two small branches, Castle Park/Otay and
Woodlawn Park. This resulted in a shortage of 7,797 square feet of library space
at the end of this threshold reporting period.
This shortage which existed on June 30,1994, has since been ameliorated through
opening of the 37,000 square foot South Chula Vista Library in April, 1995. With
that opening, the City's total library square footage rose to 102,000. Applying this
amount of square footage to a year 2000 projected population of 167,775 (83,887
sq. ft. required), the City would still be over the standard by approximately 18,113
square feet at that time.
The GMOC observes that most of the present library facilities are located in western
Chula Vista. In accordance with the City's existing Library Master Plan (adopted in
1987), library facilities are to be provided in each of the City General Plan's major
communities- in eastern Chula Vista this includes the Sweetwater/Bonita and
Eastern Territories Communities. The GMOC is aware that a future 29,000 square
foot library is planned at the northeastern corner of East 'H' Street and Paseo
Ranchero within the Rancho Del Rey development (Sweetwater/Bonita Community).
The GMOC understands that $200,000 in Capital Improvement Program funds has
been allocated for commencing preliminary architectural services in FY1996-97.
The Library's report, however, indicates that the project will be funded by
Development Impact Fees, and its timing may be delayed dependant on the
collection of fees to cover the estimated $9.5 million needed to construct, furnish
and equip the facility.
At issue for the GMOC is that the timing may be delayed despite the fact that
development and population already exist in eastern Chula Vista, and substantial
growth is on the immediate horizon. When taken in conjunction with the present
uncertainty regarding longer-term disposition of the Eastlake High School joint-use
facility (the only available in eastern Chula Vista), and currently unknown locational
and timing issues for a facility(ies) in Otay Ranch, the GMOC has concern. As
similarly stated with Police and Fire discussions, the Eastlake and Otay Ranch
projects will be undergoing major planning activities during the coming year. Given
the above noted timing and coordination concerns with planning, financing and
~ /7'- J?J
delivering libraries in eastern Chula Vista as regards these and the Rancho Del Rey
projects, the GMOC recommends:
. That an effort to update the City's Library Master Plan be
commenced, and possibly completed, during fiscal year 1995-96.
The GMOC believes that such a schedule is logical and beneficial
given the present timing for completing master plan reviews for
developments in eastern Chula Vista such as East/ake and Otay
Ranch. Land planning decisions/strategies for those projects will
have a direct impact on the future structure, location and timing
of the library system in eastern Chula Vista, and therefore,
should not be made without the benefit and guidance of an
updated Library Master Plan.
During this year's review, the GMOC received further information regarding
significant changes being brought about in the present and future delivery of library
services through the use of technology. As an example, technology will eventually
enable citizens to access books and other media through a home computer without
having to actually make a trip to the library. According to staff, currently
contemplated technology has the potential to bring about profound effects. Last
year the GMOC concluded that such technological developments could affect future
interpretation of threshold standard, and recommended reconsideration. Library
staff responded that additional time should be given to allow the technology to take
further shape before seriously embarking on review of the standard.
. The GMOC concurs with the Library's response (to last year's
recommendation to begin review of the standard) to wait for one
to two more years to review possible changes to the threshold
until more is known and defined about technological
developments in the library field, such as electronic data bases
and computer networks which can bring information to
individuals without a trip to the library. The GMOC requests that
Council continue to recognize the need for future reconsideration
of the standard.
C SEWER -
THE GMOC FINDS THAT THE CITY IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE SEWER
THRESHOLD STANDARD ON BOTH A PROJECT AND CUMULATIVE BASIS.
There were no significant instances of the threshold standard for sanitary sewers
being exceeded as a result of new growth during the reporting period. City design
standards for sewers limit the flow in sewers up to 12" in diameter to 50% full, and
to 75% full for sewers larger than 12". The City has also allowed flow up to 75%
full in 8", 1 0", and 12" diameter sewers if it can be shown that ultimate development
has already occurred in the area served by that sewer.
~ Jtj~J/
The Engineering Department's report outlined several significant activities either
recently completed, or underway, to address the provision of adequate sewer
facilities and maintenance of threshold compliance:
1) A trunk sewer usage agreement is still under preparation and negotiation
with the County for the Proctor Valley Sewer. That sewer was constructed
in 1992 to serve the Salt Creek I, Salt Creek Ranch, Rancho San Miguel and
Bonita Meadows developments as well as other adjacent parcels in the
unincorporated area of Proctor Valley. The sewer connects to the County's
Frisbee Trunk.
2) A sewer analysis was completed by Wilson Engineering in November, 1994,
for the Salt Creek Sewer Basin. The planned line will serve the Salt Creek
Ranch, Eastlake, Hidden Valley Estates (in the unincorporated area east of
Mt. Miguel), and Otay Ranch developments. Recommended improvements
and a financing plan were also approved by the City Council in November,
1994. A related development impact fee of $284 per equivalent dwelling unit
(EDU) applies to all new development in the basin as of February, 1995.
3) The City's flow monitoring program has identified several problem sites,
including the Palm Canyon area where a parallel sewer is presently under
construction. Additional portable monitoring equipment has been acquired
to improve accuracy and to expand the metering program. These expanded
efforts have commenced on sewer segments where flow is nearing capacity.
4) The City's sewer TV inspection crew continues to monitor problem sites in
order to determine if the condition of the sewer lines has affected the flow.
Phase V of the program was completed in 1994 and provided for the lining
of 1510 feet, and replacement of 440 feet of sewer mains. An additional
84,444 lineal feet were televised during 1994 for Phases VI and VII of the
program. Contracts for lining another 911 lineal feet, and replacing another
150 lineal feet of sewer mains under Phase VI are included in the FY1995-96
CIP.
5) All new developments are continuing to address the adequacy of sewers to
serve their needs. Remedial actions are required where necessary to
accommodate added flows.
Toward continuing to assure that adequate sewers are provided as the City grows,
the GMOC again expresses its concern regarding the potential impacts of
development in eastern Chula Vista on sewer facilities in older western Chula Vista,
and recommends:
. That the City Council and Public Works Department continue to
fund, staff and emphasize sewer monitoring, upgrade and
replacement programs, and related CIP's, in order to avoid any
negative impacts from development in eastern Chula Vista upon
western Chula Vista.
~ J5'- JeJ..
San Dieao Metropolitan Sewer Authoritv
At present, the City's total daily wastewater flow into the Metropolitan Sewage
System (Metro) is approximately 12.048 million gallons per day (mgd), which is up
1.061 mgd from last year (10.987 mgd), but still well within our current contract
capacity of 19.2 mgd. This 12.048 mgd includes 9.264 mgd of metered flows
discharged directly to the Metro sewer line, and 2.784 mgd of metered and non-
metered flows discharged through the Spring Valley Sewer outfall. Seven new
permanent wastewater metering stations measuring flows to the outfall are in
operation, as is a new metering station on "F" Street west of Bay Blvd. Annual
wastewater flows continue to change at a rate much less than predicted due
primarily to the recent building slowdown and water conservation efforts, and are
now more accurately tracked by the new metering stations. Staff indicates that
there is adequate capacity in the Metro system to serve growth for the coming year.
With regard to longer-term growth projections, our remaining contract capacity of
7:152 mgd should serve the City until approximately 2010.
Of note is that the City's existing Metro contract expires in 2004. The San Diego
Area Wastewater Management District (SDAWMD), however, took effect on January
1, 1993. The SDAWMD effectively replaces Metro, and under it, capacity rights
may not be treated in the same manner as they were under Metro. The SDAWMD
will manage construction and operation of Metro and Clean Water Program sewage
transportation and treatment facilities. The City decided to withdraw from the
SDAWMD without penalty in June, 1994. Since the City of San Diego also
withdrew, it is presently unclear whether San Diego or another entity will ultimately
have responsibility for Clean Water Program facilities. Present efforts on the part
of the City and other South Bay jurisdictions are focusing on various options for
financing, design, construction and operation of a treatment plant in the Otay Valley,
but no decisions have been made yet. This plant is similar to that proposed, but
postponed, under San Diego's original Clean Water Program.
Given these present uncertainties, and in order to assure that adequate sewage
treatment capacity will be available to meet the long-term needs of local growth,
regardless of the entity the City deals with, the GMOC recommends that:
. Given the amount of time it will take to complete development of
a wastewater treatment and reclamation facility, the Council
should place emphasis on the need to act expeditiously based
on the fast approaching Metro wastewater contract expiration
date in 2004. In this regard, Council should continue to support
planning and development efforts for a wastewater treatment and
reclamation facility{ies) in the South Bay area.
. As the noted treatment plant would only represent a partial
solution to the City's total long-range sewage treatment needs,
the GMOC also recgonizes and emphasizes the need to re-
negotiate the Metro contract as well.
//1-J;>
D DRAINAGE -
THE GMOC FINDS THAT THE CITY IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE DRAINAGE
THRESHOLD STANDARD ON BOTH A PROJECT AND CUMULATIVE BASIS.
No major drainage problems or threshold compliance issues can be attributed to
new growth during the review period. City growth management programs continue
to require major developments to construct detention basins and other infrastructure
so that downstream flows are not increased. Each new subdivision is required to
construct all drainage facilities to handle storms of a 10 to 100 year magnitude,
depending on the facility and size of the drainage basin. The Environmental Impact
Report for each development must address any possible drainage problems either
on-site or off-site. The developer is then required to implement mitigation measures
as necessary.
Last year, the GMOC expressed concern that quantifiable data/evidence was not
available to demonstrate that new growth in eastern Chula Vista is not negatively
impacting older facilities in western Chula Vista, and recommended development
of a monitoring system to definitively resolve whether such conditions exist. Based
on the Engineering Divisions response that such monitoring could technically be
implemented, the GMOC recommends:
. That the Public Works Department, Engineering Division be
directed to evaluate and report back to Council and the GMOC on
where proposed drainage monitoring stations (as referenced in
the GMOC's 1993 Annual Report) would be most effective. The
purpose of such evaluation is to prepare a work program and CIP
for implementing the monitoring stations in the future.
In general, the City experienced fewer drainage problems and flooding in 1994 than
in the two previous years. The Engineering Division cited several recent activities
to improve drainage in both the newer and older areas of the City.
Telegraph Canyon Channel repair east of Paseo del Rey.
Major upgrade in the lower section of the Central Drainage Basin west of
Broadway and south of "G" St. at an approximate cost of $1,500,000.
Installation of a 66 inch pipe in the reconstruction project for Broadway from
"L" St. to Naples St. This facility will help in the alleviation of past flooding
in the vicinity of Woodlawn Av. and Moss St.
Completion of repairs for the erosion, siltation and other damage caused to
the City's major rivers and creeks as a result of the January 1993 storms.
Most notable among these is the Otay Valley Rd. bridge crossing the Otay
River.
~/1-31
The GMOC also heard from a representative of the Bonita community regarding
drainage issues in Central Creek near the intersection of Bonita Rd. and Central
Ave., and issues near Bonita Rd. and Willow St. Those issues arose in the context
of the City's Sphere of Influence update study. Based on a 3/2/95 memorandum
from City staff (included with Appendix F) the GMOC was able to determine that
both matters were being addressed, and were effectively outside the GMOC's
purview. The GMOC is also aware that the County Board of Supervisors is in the
process of forming a multi-jurisdictional committee to address drainage issues in
these general areas.
While the GMOC commends the City for ongoing attentiveness to threshold
maintenance for new development, we remain concerned over needed, but
unfunded drainage improvements throughout western Chula Vista. As noted in our
1993 report, in May 1992, the City Council accepted an Engineering Department
report which included proposals for construction of drainage facilities to correct
deficiencies, and established a priority list of needed drainage improvement
projects. That list contained a total of 84 needed but currently unfunded
improvements with an approximated cost of $23,025,000. Considering an inflation
rate of 4% per year, funding of $1,695,000 per year for 20 years would be
necessary to complete the projects. In conjunction with this year's threshold report,
the Engineering Division again presented a select list of the current top 15 priority
projects, totaling $5,400,000, and reflecting necessary new budget appropriations
through FY 1999-2000 to accomplish them. As a result:
. The GMOC notes that completion of recent drainage
improvement projects in western Chula Vista have reduced
previous drainage problems, as evidenced by the lack of major
flooding during recent heavy rains. However, the GMOC remains
concerned about the volume of needed but currently unfunded
drainage improvements in western Chula Vista as reflected on
the "Summary of Unfunded Drainage Project Needs" prepared by
the Public Works Department, Engineering Division.
Therefore, the GMOC continues to recommend that the City
Council accept and endorse the top 15 priority projects list of
needed drainage improvements in western Chula Vista, and work
toward appropriating funding for them as soon as possible.
CI FISCAL -
THE GMOC FINDS THAT THE CITY IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE FISCAL
THRESHOLD STANDARD ON BOTH A CUMULATIVE AND PROJECT BASIS.
NEW GROWTH HAS GENERALLY PRODUCED SUFFICIENT REVENUES TO
FUND CURRENT. RELATED FACILITIES AND SERVICES.
The Fiscal threshold standard addresses the impacts of growth on the City's fiscal
well being, particularly the collection and expenditure of impact fees from new
development. The Fiscal threshold calls for the preparation of a report to the
~/fr3~
GMOC which evaluates the fiscal impacts of growth on operations and capital
improvements over both the previous 12 months, and the coming 12-18 month
period, including an analysis of development impact fee collection and expenditure
over the previous 12-month period.
Develooment Imoact Fee Proarams
The GMOC continues to be impressed by the ongoing sophistication of the overall
Development Impact Fee (DIF) program, and its periodic updates, to ensure funds
are available commensurate with facility and service needs. Under the Growth
Management Program and Ordinance (GMP), all major development projects are
required to prepare Public Facilities Phasing and Financing Plans (PFFP) to ensure
the timely provision of needed facilities and services consistent with the threshold
standards. Most of the major master planned developments have also prepared
Fiscal Impact Analyses (FIA) to address creation of a positive revenue picture, and
these analyses are periodically updated to reflect actual conditions and
occurrences.
Evaluation of facility needs, and related phasing and financial planning for major
developments and other activities, have become an integral part of the day-to-day
development review process. The various special assessment and financing
districts required of major new developments are designed to generate sufficient
revenue to fund current projects and services. In addition, an annual DIF funds
financial report is prepared to review the funding status of each DIF and its projects,
and to update the associated costs for these and any new facilities necessary to
support future development. The reports analyze the apportionment of costs to
projected development in order to adjust the DIF's to be applied to new
development.
In accordance with these annual DIF reports, the Finance Director indicated that the
various DIF's (Transportation, Drainage, Sewers and Public Facilities), as well as
related CIP planning efforts, are generally working as planned and appear in good
fiscal health. This takes into consideration that some of the DIF's (being 15-20+
year facility plans) are still in their relative infancy, and that some facilities, such as
major roadways, have been advance constructed by developers who then receive
credit against DIF payments at the time of building permit issuance.
In illustration of the GMOC's perception of the successful workings of the DIF
programs, following is a summary of recent major DIF activities and expenditures:
1) Completion of street improvements for the Rancho Del Rey commercial
center ($210,000), Otay Valley Rd. widening ($280,000), and Otay Lakes Rd.
widening ($171,000).
2) Adoption of the Interim SR125 DIF to finance an interim facility should
CTV/CAL TRANS not produce a freeway (tollroad) facility in a timely manner
to maintain thresholds.
~/~/;J~
3) Establishment of a Traffic Signal Fee to provide for signals whose need
arises from traffic volume increases caused by new development. Signals
funded or installed in FY1993-94 include Third Ave. & Anita St., East Orange
Ave. & Loma Ln., Telegraph Canyon Rd. & Paseo Ladera, Otay Lakes Rd.
& Gotham St., and 1-805 & Otay Valley Rd.
4) Re-evaluation of the Eastlake Park DIF, and review and update of the
original Eastlake Park, and Eastlake II and III agreements.
5) Installation of drainage improvements with the Olay Lakes Rd. widening
($163,000), and drainage design work for Telegraph Canyon ($25,000).
6) Establishment of the Telegraph Canyon Gravity Sewer DIF ($184 per EDU),
and the Telegraph Canyon Pumped Sewer DIF ($560 per EDU).
7) Public Facilities DIF (PFDIF) repayment to the General Fund of $1,400,000
to cover the DIF cost of the Police Facility remodeling. $95,000 for adding
new police officers due to growth of the City, and $16,000 towards the
Computer Aided Dispatch project.
8) PFDIF expenditure ($275,000) for property acquisition for expansion of the
Civic Center parking.
9) Establishment of the Eastlake Interim Fire Station ($68,000).
10) Installation of the major hardware and software components of the City's
Geographic Information System ($305,000).
With respect to long-range DIF planning and update, last year the GMOC
recommended that the annual update process for each of the DIF's be expanded
to include a five-year projection of needs based on the 5-7 year growth forecasts
called for under the Growth Management Program (GMP). The intent was to
provide consistency in the assumptions used, and in the identification of issues
before they become a problem. The Finance Director's report responded to this
issue, and indicated that with regard to transportation, drainage and sewer related
DIF's, the five year projections are already effectively incorporated. Under the City's
Capital Improvement Program (CIP) budget process, all capital projects to be
constructed by the City, including those funded through DIF's, go through an annual
review which looks out over a five-year time span in accordance with growth
projections.
The Finance Director's report also indicated, however, that the Public Facilities DIF
differs from the others since it is a City-wide DIF involving many different facets,
with non-DIF funding participation for many of its projects. While the PFDIF
identifies the projects, estimates costs and fees, and provides the status of the
project, it does not specifically say when or if funds are available. Given the recent
"pooling" of the PFDIF funds, which the GMOC believes increases the need for
projections and coordination, and in response to the Finance Director's concurrence
~ J1~J?
with the need for a more formalized program scheduling and projection of
needs/revenues with future PFDIF updates, the GMOC recommends:
. That incorporation of 5-year development projections into the Public
Facilities DIF updates occur, as has been done for the other DIF's.
Citv-wide Fiscal Overview
Per the Finance Director's report, most General Fund revenue accounts showed
moderate increases in FY1993-94 (up 5.4% overall); a reflection of continued local
growth and slight improvement in the economy. In overview, increases included
sales tax (3.9%), franchise and utility users taxes, and licenses and permits
(86.8%). Property taxes on the other hand, declined by 8.5% due to ongoing state
shift of these revenues from cities to schools, which is a three year phased
program. Additionally, many property owners, including several large local
corporations such as ROHR Industries Inc., obtained reductions in their tax
assessments resulting from real estate market declines.
In general, the City has lost approximately $3.5 million per year over the last 3
years due to various state budget actions. Fortunately, the City has been able to
offset those losses through the use of one-time revenues, and thus far avoid
significant cuts to staffing and/or services which could affect thresholds. Last year,
the GMOC expressed concern over the use of one-time revenues in offsetting state
cuts and recessionary losses. Our premise was that by nature, "one time" revenues
may not always be available, or not in a sufficient amount, to offset losses,
particularly if state cuts and recession continue. Many cities in the region have
already been faced with wholesale cuts and the related deterioration of services.
Under such a scenario, the GMOC envisions potential impacts to threshold
standards as staffing and/or services could be cut, and feels it prudent to make our
concern known even though this situation derives from non-growth related fiscal
issues.
In response, the City Manager has reported verbally to the GMOC that staff is
aware of the potential for non-growth fiscal impacts arising from recession and state
budget cuts to affect the delivery of services, and is approaching budgeting efforts
conservatively in order to maintain fiscal and other thresholds.
a WATER -
THE GMOC FINDS THAT BOTH THE SWEETWATER AUTHORITY AND OTAY
WATER DISTRICT HAVE SUFFICIENT WATER SUPPLY AND AVAILABiliTY TO
MEET THE NEEDS OF lOCAL GROWTH OVER THE NEXT 12 TO 18 MONTHS.
AND ARE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THAT ASPECT OF THE WATER THRESHOLD
STANDARD.
The GMOC commends both water districts for their continuing cooperative efforts
together, with other water districts, and with the City regarding the supply and
/'/~-Jr
delivery of water to meet the needs of development. We also want to recognize
both Otay Water District and Sweetwater Authority again for their responsiveness
in addressing prior GMOC concerns regarding shorter-term supply and storage
issues, and for their continuing efforts in these regards. It is also worthy to note that
for the first time in seven years, the GMOC is not recomending issuance of a
Statement of Concern to either district. On the contrary, given the continued
cooperative efforts to address supply issues, and the progress toward assuring a
guaranteed water supply for Chula Vista and South Bay residents and businesses,
the GMOC felt prompt recognition was deserved, and issued a separate letter of
commendation to the Mayor and Council with copies districts (please see Appendix
H).
Both the Sweetwater Authority and the Otay Water District indicated that the 12-18
month forecast for water supply was excellent, given rains and the heavy Sierra
snowfalls. In addition, they indicated that the long-term supply outlook has also
greatly improved. Last year the GMOC issued a Statement of Concern to both
districts based mainly on outstanding long-term supply issues. Since that time, the
Metropolitan Water District (MWD) has implemented a water policy to assure long-
term supply. MWD's goal is to meet 100% of the water demand 90% of the time,
and the remaining 10% of the time meet a minimum of 80% of the water demand.
Within the San Diego Region, the County Water Authority (CWA) and individual
agencies are discussing the potential exchange of water between agencies, and the
"wheeling" of water by CWA to further increase long-term supply reliability.
Of further note regarding improved long-term supply reliability, MWD has also
acquired a large tract of land in Riverside County near Hemet, and begun
construction of Domenigoni Reservoir to store excess water in times of plentiful
supply. The reservoir will increase water storage capacity for delivery to the San
Diego area by over 400% to assure the availability of water in times of drought,
earthquakes and other emergencies. Construction is scheduled for completion in
1999, and several years beyond that will be needed to fill the reservoir.
On the local front, the districts continue to actively participate on the Interagency
Water Task Force (IAWTF) which has proven an excellent forum for the City and
both districts to develop strategies for immediate and long range water delivery to
the South Bay area. In addition to that effort, following are other significant
activities being undertaken by the districts (both individually and together with other
agencies) which the GMOC feels are worthy of note:
1) CWA's Pipeline No. 4 to serve the South Bay should become operational
during 1997. This second pipeline will increase the treated water delivery
capacity to Otay Water District and generally provide additional water
delivery reliability to both districts in the instance of planned or unplanned
shutdowns of the present single pipeline.
2) Otay Water is continuing to develop a sufficient storage and supply network
to meet the demands of new development and, in accordance with CWA
goals, to sustain a 10 day independence in the event that potable water
TJC;-;SJ
deliveries by CWA to Otay are interrupted by planned or emergency
aqueduct shutdowns. Efforts in this regard include ongoing negotiations with
the City of San Diego, Sweetwater Authority and Helix Water District for
treatment plant capacity and lake storage. All have indicated a willingness
to execute agreements pending Board and Council approvals.
3) Otay is continuing with construction of a 30 million gallon (MG) terminal
storage reservoir west of Eastlake Parkway, which should be completed by
late 1995. This includes the cell whose walls failed during initial filling earlier
this year.
Otay also has under design a project to link Roll Reservoir with the 30 MG
Eastlake Greens Reservoir, whereby up to an additional 20 million gallons
per day could be delivered in an emergency. Combined with the 30 MG
Eastlake Greens Reservoir, this will provide the area with more than a 10
day supply of emergency water through the year 2000.
Additionally, Otay Water has drilled an exploratory well approximately 900
foot deep at the Eastlake Greens reservoir site. This well may produce
about 40 gallons per minute, and Otay is presently evaluating the
benefit/cost of placing the well in service.
4) Otay has completed a draft update of its Water Resources Master Plan
utilizing current SANDAG Series 8 growth projections and input from local
developers. The update was prepared in close cooperation with the City,
and was employed during the City's Sphere-of-Influence update which
identifies Otay as the preferred water provider for developing areas in
eastern Chula Vista. The master plan will be reviewed each year with regard
to evaluating the best alternatives for providing a reliable water supply, and
comprehensively updated every five years.
5) Both agencies continue to promote and develop water conservation
programs applied to both existing users and new development.
6) Otay continues to require installation of reclaimed water pipelines in new
development, and along with Sweetwater Authority, is supportive of local
efforts to construct an advanced wastewater treatment plant in the Olay
River Valley which would provide reclaimed water. The proposed Otay
Valley plant is a significant local facility in that it would provide reclaimed
water for these newly built distribution facilities. Otay has also been
evaluating capacity issues at their existing Ralph W. Chapman treatment
facility in cooperation the City, Sweetwater Authority, and City of San Diego.
7) Sweetwater Authority has completed preliminary design and environmental
review work for a brackish groundwater extraction and desalinization project
within the Lower Sweetwater Valley near the northwest quadrant of SR54
and Edgemere Ave. near the new Food-4-Less market. Although the same
T/7-'/~
project, this is a different site than that which was outlined in last year's
report.
8) Sweetwater Authority has a feasibility study in progress to increase the
capacity of Sweetwater Reservoir by approximately 2000 acre feet, which
would roughly provide for the annual water needs of 4000 households. The
increased storage will lessen dependance on imported water.
9) Sweetwater Authority continues to investigate the storage of surplus water
in groundwater aquifers by using injection/extraction wells in the San Diego
Formation.
10) Sweetwater Authority and Otay Water District are working through the CWA
to develop a region-wide "Highly Reliable Water Supply Rate" in response
to the request of the mayor of Chula Vista for a firm water supply for new
industry. This proposal has been merged with the City of San Diego's
SWAP program (San Diego Water Availability Plan) which proposes to collect
slightly higher rates to provide funds for water transfers.
11) Representatives of both Districts are continuing to meet with the City and
other interested parties to address issues of joint concem through the
IAWTF, including state-wide water matters which may impact development
within Chula Vista.
Notwithstanding these positive efforts, the GMOC remains concerned over long-term
water supply and importation, and therefore continues to recommend:
. That Council, through the Interagency Water Task Force, actively
work with the CWA and other local water agencies to further
develop local resources to reduce dependancy on imported
water.
While not a concern directed at supply or storage, the GMOC has previously noted
that the City needs to increase coordination with the Sweetwater Authority regarding
advance planning of water facility upgrades to support rezonings and infill
development, particularly in the northwestern quadrant of the City. In response, the
Sweetwater Authority notes greatly improved communication between project
proponents, the City and themselves. The Authority has provided the City with
information on those pipes needing upgrade or replacement, so that affected project
applicants can be aware as early as possible in the development review process.
~ /'1-'1/
C SCHOOLS -
THE GMOC FINDS. BASED ON THE CHULA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
AND SWEETWATER UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICTS' RESPONSES TO THE
CITY'S 12-18 MONTH GROWTH FORECAST. THAT THE SCHOOLS
THRESHOLD STANDARD IS BEING MET.
For the second year in a row, both districts have reported that sufficient capacity
exists to accommodate student enrollment over the next 12-18 months as
forecasted from City development projections. This condition is due in part to the
reduced volume of development resulting from continued recession, but also from
the fact that much of the growth will occur in eastern Chula Vista where sufficient
new facilities are being provided through Mello-Roos Community Facilities Districts
(CFD's). This is not to say that capacity issues do not exist in schools, particularly
west of the 1-805 where the majority are operating above capacity, and where
students are being accommodated through a combination of relocatable classrooms,
classroom reconfiguration and busing.
The following are overviews of currently relevant school planning activities and
issues specific to each district.
a. Chula Vista Elementary School District
Based upon the City's 12 to 18 month growth forecast, the Chula Vista
Elementary School District has estimated that it will need to accommodate
16 new students west of 1-805, given the 54 residential units forecast for
completion there from July, 1994 through December, 1995. Currently, most
of the schools west of 1-805 are at or over permanent capacity, although
some capacity does exist in certain schools at various grade levels. As of
April, 1995, a total of 584 children from around the District were being bused
to relieve this situation. This is up from 302 children previously reported for
January, 1994. The District, however, has indicated that it can
accommodate the projected new students within existing facilities through a
combination of the techniques previously noted.
With regard to longer-term planning for adding capacity west of 1-805, only
limited physical opportunities continue to exist for expanding existing schools.
Vista Square and Rice Elementary Schools could potentially be expanded,
and Feaster School has adjacent vacant land that could be acquired. In all
these instances, however, lack of funding continues to be an obstacle to
progress. The GMOC recognizes there is very limited prospect of additional
facilities being provided to alleviate this problem in the foreseeable future
due to land and funding constraints. We feel there is a possibility, however,
that this situation could be alleviated by district-wide multi-track programming
of students. Serious consideration should be given to the role of multi-track,
as it appears the most logical/workable response to alleviate overcrowding
given the noted constraints to new construction. The GMOC understands
7Ij/~;;-
the current degree of opposition on a variety of fronts, and feels it is
incumbent upon the school board to initiate a public education program and
study of the need for multi-track scheduling. Therefore the GMOC
recommends:
. That the City Council forward a communication to the
District Board suggesting establishment of a task force to
study the efficacy and practicality of establishing multi-
track programming in the elementary schools.
East of 1-805, the District estimates it will need to accommodate
approximately 522 new students, given the 1741 new residential units
forecast for completion in the area from July, 1994 through December, 1995.
The vast majority of these units (92%) are in the Eastlake, Rancho Del Rey,
Salt Creek I and Telegraph Canyon Estates planned communities. The
District indicated that this estimated growth in school enrollments can be
accommodated by existing schools and schools which are being planned and
financed through current Mello-Roos CFD's. Eastlake School is currently
using relocatable classrooms to accommodate new students until
Olympicview Elementary School in the Eastlake Greens project opens in mid-
1995. The District continues to work with developers to establish additional
CFD's, or other forms of full mitigation to address schools provision for the
Salt Creek Ranch, Otay Ranch and Rancho San Miguel projects. Other
smaller projects continue to be annexed to generic CFD NO.5.
The Chula Vista Elementary School District's report also noted a number of
activities and issues relevant to future schools planning and financing which
should be noted.
1) The District continues to be interested in expanding Feaster School
through acquisition of the four acre parcel adjacent to the east which
is for sale. For the Feaster site, financing appears available only
through the imposition of mitigation on the proposed Bayfront project.
The District is concerned that some form of mitigation agreement
involving the Feaster site has not been prepared or executed.
Passage of SB1066 as discussed later in this section could have
negative impacts given the present situation. Whatever development
eventually occurs there, it must be required to fully mitigate all
impacts to school facilities.
2) The District continues a variety of activities to plan proactively for
growth and improvement of school facilities, including: a) development
tracking and phasing monitoring; b) school growth planning; c)
boundary/attendance area adjustments; d) residency verification; e)
requests for City assistance in obtaining full mitigation; f) responses
to notices of proposed development projects with recommended
mitigation; and g) participation in the State Modernization Program.
/ /1-1}
3) Proposition 170, which would have reduced the required vote for
general obligation bonds to a simple majority failed in 1993. Similar
legislation was not introduced in 1994 as anticipated, and the earliest
similar legislation could be introduced is 1996. As a result, the
District's ability to generate funds through a general obligation bond
continues to be severely constrained.
4) Under the State Building Program (modernization), the District
received Phase III (construction) approval in 1994 for modernizing 11
of their oldest schools. The State is effectively out of money for
building schools, however, and a "zero apportionment" was given.
Therefore, the projects remain ready to go, but are unfunded.
5) Senate Bill (SB)1066 threatens to remove consideration of school
impacts from the development planning and approval process, and
would also limit the amount districts could collect under state
mandated fees collected at the time of building permit issuance.
SB1066 has cleared the Senate Education Committee and is
proceeding through the Legislature. Combined with the fact that the
state is out of money for building/remodeling schools, and that bond
measures appear unlikely for raising needed money, passage of
SB1066 could be disastrous for local schools construction. The
District stressed the need to oppose the legislation.
The GMOC would like to note that it is also extremely concerned with
SB1066, and due to the noted urgency to forward opposition to the state,
already advanced this matter to the City Council for action. It is our
understanding the Council considered the item in May, and through its
Legislative Committee has sent letters of opposition to appropriate parties in
Sacramento. This is relevant to the Sweetwater Union High School District
as well.
b. Sweetwater Union Hiah School District
The Sweetwater Union High School District reported an enrollment of 28,945
students throughout the district, a 91 student (0.3%) increase over the 1993-
94 school year. Of these students, 15,000, or 52% of the total, attend the
five high schools, three middle schools and one junior high school in Chula
Vista. By comparison, enrollment in secondary schools in Chula Vista
schools grew by 548 students over 1993-94 levels, while the overall District
increased by only 91 students.
Given the 12-18 month forecast provided by the Chula Vista Planning
Department, the District projects an increase of 522 students in Chula Vista
middle, junior high and high schools in the 1995-96 school year. This
increase is based on projected growth of 1795 dwelling units between July,
1994 and December, 1995. Of this enrollment growth, 97% will be absorbed
at Bonita Vista Middle, Bonita Vista High and Eastlake High Schools. Bonita
TJ1-'1i
Vista Middle School will continue to experience development pressure, and
to alleviate such, the District has started planning for the construction of a
new middle school within the Rancho Del Rey development which is
scheduled to open in the Fall of 1998. In addition, as Eastlake and Rancho
Del Rey build out, attendance boundary adjustments for Bonita Vista and
Eastlake High Schools will be made to balance enrollment increases. To
address the limited enrollment growth in other areas, and at the noted
campuses on an interim basis, relocatable classrooms will be utilized as
needed subject to funding availability.
The District continues to work with other major development projects to
establish Mello-Roos CFD's or other forms of full mitigation. Projects for
which negotiations have not yet been completed are Rancho San Miguel,
Otay Ranch and Salt Creek Ranch. The District continues to draw attention
to Salt Creek Ranch which has already received Tentative Map Approval.
As planned, students from the nearly completed Salt Creek I project are to
attend Eastlake High School. Students from Salt Creek Ranch will also
attend Eastlake High School. The schools in Otay Ranch are to be
constructed large enough to accomodate the equivalent number of students
which will come from Salt Creek Ranch. In July, 1993, Community Facilities
District (CFD) proceedings were formally abandoned by the Baldwin
Company for the Salt Creek Ranch project, and negotiations have yet to be
resumed with the District. It takes some time to form a new CFD and to
generate adequate revenue to finance construction of a new school. If
mitigation is to be in the form of a CFD, it is essential that formation occur
well in advance (2-3 years) of development to assure facilities will be
available when children begin to arrive. In response, last year the GMOC
recommended that the City encourage negotiations to resume, and
understands that the City issued a letter to this effect to the Baldwin
Company. As the District indicates that discussions have not yet resumed,
the GMOC recommends:
. That the City again contact the Salt Creek Ranch
developer and stress the need to resume negotiations with
the District. As incentive, the GMOC suggests the City
also consider withholding the acceptance of any final
maps for the project until such time as the school district
notifies the City that they have reached understanding
with that developer as to the method(s} and timing for the
provision of planned schools. This is also relevant to the
elementary school district.
The report from the Sweetwater Union High School District also described
various activities and concerns of the district in addressing school planning
and construction. In several instances, the high school district's comments
were synonymous with those previously listed with the elementary school
district discussions, and therefore have been abbreviated here.
//7/'/3
1) The failure of Proposition 170, which would have reduced the required
vote for general obligation bonds to a simple majority.
2) Although the District's concerns over the need for full schools
mitigation for the Bayfront project have been heard by the Council,
they have yet to be solidified through a written agreement. This
remains of concern as it also does for the Elementary School District.
3) The District continues to establish Mello-Roos CFD's for new
development in the Eastern Territories, to participate in the state
lease-purchase program for new schools, to conduct ongoing review
and adjustment of attendance boundaries, and to perform residency
verification.
Regarding CFD's and other forms of full mitigation, the District again
highlighted that state-mandated (building permit) school fees only
provide for less than a third of the cost of needed school construction,
and indicated that it is imperative that the City continue to support
efforts to achieve full mitigation whenever possible.
4) The District is continuing its cooperation and preplanning review with
the City of all development proposals, General Plan amendments and
rezonings.
5) The high school district is also extremely concerned over the potential
passage of SB1066 and its related negative impacts to in-process
schools planning efforts which have yet to be completed. Their report
highlighted the possible consequences to the Bayfront project, Salt
Creek Ranch, Otay Ranch and Rancho San Miguel.
Council's forwarding of letters of opposition to SB1066, as discussed on
page 29, should satisfy the District's request to oppose.
6) The District noted the importance of the pending SourcePoint study
to comprehensively identifying longer-term school enrollment impacts
resulting from both residential and non-residential development. The
study will provide a direct basis for developing appropriate mitigation
mechanisms, and the District fully supports an expeditious completion
and adoption.
The mentioned SourcePoint joint enrollment impact mitigation study was discussed
in last year's GMOC report, and the GMOC understands that the City, school
districts and SourcePoint (the non-profit arm of the San Diego Association of
Governments) are very near completion. The study's data should be extremely
useful to the districts and the City in identifying school facility needs based on
projected residential and non-residential development, and demographic changes.
Having identified these impacts, potential methods for mitigation will subsequently
//7-1/~
be analyzed and a proposal prepared for City Council/school board consideration.
Given continuing school enrollment growth, the presence of overcrowding in many
area schools (both elementary and secondary), and the stated importance of the
SourcePoint study in forming a common foundation from which to address these
situations, the GMOC recommends that the City:
. Promote prompt completion of the cooperative study underway
between the City, the Sweetwater Union High School District,
Chula Vista Elementary School District and SourcePoint to
identify the impacts of new residential and non-residential
development, and demography upon City schools.
Based upon the study's results, the City Council should direct
that staff expedite development of proposed mitigation strategies
for consideration and adoption by the City Council and both
school boards. The study, along with at least a draft of the
resulting proposed mitigation strategies, should be adopted not
later than the Fall of 1995 so that they can be available when the
GMOC commences its next review in October, 1995.
In the spirit of continued cooperation, and in order to accomplish expeditious
completion and adoption of both the study and mitigation program(s), the GMOC
further recommends:
. That the City Council invite the district boards to form a joint
task force to discuss mitigation strategies subsequent to release
of the SourcePoint study.
D TRAFFIC -
THE GMOC FINDS THAT THE CITY IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE TRAFFIC
THRESHOLD STANDARD ON BOTH A CUMULATIVE AND PROJECT BASIS. AS
EVIDENCED BY THE FINDINGS OF THE 1994 TRAFFIC MONITORING
PROGRAM ITMPI REPORT.
The threshold for traffic requires that Level-of-Service (LOS) "C" or better as
measured by observed average travel speed on all signalized arterial segments,
except that during peak hours, ~OS of "D" can occur for no more than any two
hours of the day. Those signalized intersections west of 1-805 which did not meet
the above standard when it was established in 1991, may continue to operate at
their 1991 LOS levels, but shall not worsen. The traffic threshold utilizes the
Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) method which analyzes conditions over whole
roadway segments, and is intended as a more comprehensive measurement since
it considers the overall "driving experience" in terms of time delay.
~ JJ-1j7
1994 Traffic Monitorina Proaram
The 1994 Traffic Monitoring Program (TMP) presented to the GMOC
summarizes the results of analysis performed through actual travel time and
speed surveys of all the arterial streets in Chula Vista during the Mid-day
peak hour period (11 :30 am to 1 :30 pm). As required by the threshold
standard, studies were also done during both the PM (4 pm to 6 pm) and AM
(7 am to 9 am) peak periods to re-evaluate performance on segments
studied under the 1992 and 1993 TMP's respectively, which operated at LOS
C or less in at least one direction during those periods. The travel studies
were conducted from January through July 1994.
The 1994 TMP results show that all arterial segments studied during the Mid-
day peak period were found to operate at LOS "C" or better. The following
ten (10) arterial segments were found to be operating at LOS "C", in at least
one direction as indicated at the right:
Third Ave.
Fourth Ave.
Broadway
Broadway
ESt.
H St.
E. H St.
L St.
Otay Lakes
Palomar St.
(C St. - H St.)
(SR-54 EB ramps - H St.)
(C St. - H St.)
(L St. - Faivre St.)
(1-5 NB ramps - Third Ave.)
(1-5 NB ramps - Third Ave.)
(SW College - Rutgers Ave.)
(Industrial - Third Ave.)
(E. H St. - Tel. Cyn. Rd.)
(1-5 NB ramps - Broadway)
- NB & SB
- SB
- SB
- NB
-WB
- EB & WB
-WB
- EB
- NB
- EB & WB
For those five (5) 1993 TMP arterial segments found to be operating at LOS
C during the AM peak period, and which were re-studied by the 1994 TMP,
none presently operate at less than LOS C. Following are those re-studied
segments:
Third Ave.
H St.
E. H St.
Otay Lakes
Palomar St.
(C St. - H St.)
(1-5 NB ramps - Third Ave.)
(SW College - Rutgers Ave.)
(E. H St. - Tel. Cyn. Rd.)
(1-5 NB ramps - Broadway)
- NB
- EB
-WB
- NB & SB
- EB
For those nine (9) 1992 TMP arterial segments found to be operating at LOS
C during the PM peak period, and which were re-studied by the 1994 TMP,
all are presently operating at LOS C or better, except those two which are
asterisked, and were found to be operating at LOS D. Following are those
re-studied segments:
Third Ave.
Third Ave.
Fourth Ave.
(C St. - H St.)
(Naples St. - Main St.)
(SR-54 EB ramps - H St.)
;7' /; -tjr
- NB & SB
- NB & SB
- SB
Broadway
E SI.
H SI.
L SI.
'Otay Lakes
'Palomar SI.
(C SI. - H SI.)
(1-5 NB ramps - Third Ave.)
(1-5 NB ramps - Third Ave.)
(Industrial - Third Ave.)
(E. H SI. - Tel. Cyn. Rd.)
(1-5 NB ramps - Broadway)
- SB
- EB
- EB & WB
- EB
- NB
- EB
For those two LOS D segments (*), the GMOC notes that the Traffic
Engineering Division indicates that the recent completion of widening to
Palomar SI. in conjunction with the Palomar Trolley Center construction,
should greatly improve LOS performance. With regard to Otay Lakes Rd.,
the GMOC understands that installation of dual left turn lanes in both
directions at the intersection with E. H SI. is scheduled as part of the 1995-
96 CIP, and will remedy LOS performance problems for the short to mid-
term. Widening of the road segment to its full six lanes will need to occur at
some point in the future.
With regard to arterial segments involving interchanges with 1-5 and 1-805
(arterial interchange segments), the 1994 TMP continues to reflect marginal
levels-of-service performance with the standard. This is due primarily to the
close spacing of the signals, signal timing at the freeway ramps which is
controlled by CAL TRANS, and the high volume of vehicles entering and
exiting the freeway. This is especially true of the short segment of
westbound "H" Street between Woodlawn Ave. and Bay Blvd. A related
concern remains with the trolley crossing gates at "E", "H" and Palomar
Streets which interrupt flows every 5 to 7.5 minutes. The GMOC reiterates
the need to continue to urge the Metropolitan Transit Development Board
(MTDB) to eventually construct grade separations or other solutions to
improve long-term traffic flow.
In summary, the 1994 TMP found all arterial interchange segments to be
operating at LOS C or better during the Mid-day period, except for the
eastbound direction of H SI. at 1-5 which operates at LOS D. All arterial
interchange segments found to be operating a LOS C or less by the 1992
TMP (PM period) and 1993 TMP (AM period) were also restudied. The
results are as follows:
LOS on E SI.(EB & WB) at 1-5 remains at LOS D.
LOS on H SI.(EB) at 1-5 decreased from LOS C to D.
LOS on H SI.(WB) at 1-5 increased from LOS E to D.
LOS on J SI.(WB) at 1-5 decreased from LOS C to D.
For the 1995 TMP, those arterial and arterial interchange segments found to
operate at LOS C or less by the 1994 TMP will be restudied. In 1996, the TMP's
study cycle will begin again with City-wide travel time evaluations to establish new
comprehensive information for the PM peak period (4 pm to 6 pm).
/ /~/11
During last year's review of the 1993 TMP, the GMOC noted its continuing concern
over traffic conditions for the following five areas, and asked for a comprehensive
evaluation with report back this year:
1. "H" SI. east of 1-805.
2. "H" SI. west of 1-805 to 1-5.
3. Otay Lakes Rd. between East "H" SI. and Telegraph Canyon Rd.
4. Palomar SI. between Broadway and 1-5, and
5. SR-125.
The GMOC received a separate report (included with Appendix J) and oral
presentation regarding present and projected traffic conditions for each of the five
areas. Based on that report and presentation:
. The GMOC commends the City's Traffic Engineering Division for
a thorough report in response to last year's concerns, however,
we remain extremely concerned with the imminent situation on
'H' Street west of 1-805 as outlined on page 6 of that report. As
stated therein, in the future it may not be possible to meet
current Threshold standards without reclassifying "H" Street to
six./anes and constructing such a facility. Due to the maior
imDact such widening would have on existing residential
DroDerties. the Citv mav have to disregard the Threshold
Standard. acceDt a lower Level of Service for this Dortion of the
roadwav. or curtail deve/oDment to recognize roadwav
constraints.
Because of the noted likelihood of threshold failure on H SI. west of 1-805,
depending on what range of potential remedial solutions are determined by the
Council to be feasible, the GMOC further recommends:
. That the City Council direct the Public Works Department,
Engineering Division, to prepare and present a comprehensive
report on anticipated future threshold conditions on H St. west
of 1.805, along with the full range of possIble remedial actions
and their relative affect on maintaining threshold performance.
Based on this report, the GMOC requests that Council give
direction on which remedy(ies) are to be implemented, and
accordingly, whether a future lower leve/-of.service for this
segment will be deemed acceptable.
With regard to SR125, and the proposed Interim SR125 plan (HNTB) consisting of
an enhanced network of existing and planned roadways in the general future
alignment of the full freeway facility, the GMOC has concerns. It is our
understanding that the Interim SR125 plan outlined in the HNTB study is a
contingency plan, and is not designed to handle the long-term traffic needs of
~~fZ7
already approved projects within the City's Planning Area. Per the HNTB study, this
includes portions of Eastlake, Salt Creek Ranch, Rancho San Miguel, and all but
Villages 1 & 5 of the Otay Ranch project. Therefore, should the CTV/CAL TRANS
venture not materialize, either on schedule or at all, then the City would move
forward with the Interim SR125 plan until such time as an adequate freeway facility
is constructed. Given that no funding plan for a full SR125 is in place, other than
the present CTV joint venture, the GMOC foresees a major potential transportation
planning problem in meeting the buildout needs of approved projects. Therefore,
we recommend:
. That the City actively support plans for development of the full
SR125 freeway facility. The Interim SR125 plan (HNTB) is viewed
with concern, since it is insufficient to meet the longer term
transportation needs of already approved development.
Notwithstanding the traffic issues presented in this section, the GMOC again notes
that monitoring improvements have resulted from the TMP and its associated
methods of measurement under the HCM threshold standard. The effort produces
very thorough results which enable potential issues to be identified in advance,
thereby allowing sufficient time to resolve them before they become problematic.
C PARKS AND RECREATION -
THE GMOC FINDS. BASED ON THE PRESENT STANDARD, THAT THE CITY IS
IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE PARKS AND RECREATION THRESHOLD ON BOTH
A CUMULATIVE AND PROJECT BASIS.
The Parks and Recreation threshold is a population-based standard calling for 3.0
acres of neighborhood and community park land to be provided for every 1,000
residents east of 1-805. This standard has been met as of July 1, 1994, as
illustrated by the following table:
Acres of Acres/ Acre Shortfall
Area Population Parks 1.000 or Excess
East of 1-805 41,319 203.40 4.92 +79.44
West of 1-805 108,933 129.45 1.19 -197.35
City-Wide 150,252 332.85 2.22 -117.91
Standard/Ideal 150,252 450.76 3.00 -117.91
~-3/
While demonstrating compliance (based on the present standard applying east of
1-805 only), this table also reveals the continuing shortfall in park land both for
western Chula Vista and for the City as a whole.
Last year, a considerable amount of the Parks section of the GMOC report
addressed matters related to the adoption of a revised parks and recreation
threshold standard to apply City-wide. The GMOC's request for such a revision
dates back six years. In 1992, Council endorsed the concept of such an amended
standard, but called for a study of a potential credit system (parks equivalency
factor) which could be employed toward addressing pre-existing deficient conditions
in western Chula Vista. That study, under the title of the Parks Implementation Plan
(PIP), was initiated by staff two years ago, but has yet to be completed and
adopted. The GMOC notes that the majority of last year's recommendations are still
outstanding as they are contingent on completion of the PIP and related work
efforts. There is growing concern since the PIP has been promised for a number
of years, but has yet to materialize. Therefore:
. The GMOC recommends and stresses that Council ensure,
through staffing and funding allocations (the budget process),
that the PIP is completed by Fall, 1995 as proposed, so that it will
be available for consideration during the next GMOC review cycle
commencing in October, 1995.
. Given the significance of the GMOC's continuing concern on parks planning issues,
and until such time as the PIP is adopted and available for GMOC review, the
following outstanding recommendations from the 1993 GMOC Annual Report are
still relevant:
. That the City Council amend the Parks and Recreation Threshold
Standard to apply City-wide, both east and west of I-80S.
. That the City Council direct staff to expedite completion of the Parks
Implementation Plan (PIP), and ensure that the PIP is a priority in the
work programs of the Planning and Parks and Recreation Departments
for the next year; and,
. That those sub-components of the PIP which will form a basis for a
revised standard be directed for placement up-front in the
aforementioned work program to avoid continued delay in the adoption
of a revised standard.
. That a Greenbelt Master Plan be undertaken and closely coordinated
with the PIP to ensure optimum use of the Greenbelt for park and
recreation purposes.
~?-->;2
. That the City Council direct staff to fully consider Greenbelt issues in
the course of reviewing current project proposals within and adjacent
to the SR54 corridor between 1-805 and 1-5.
. The City should create an impact fee program which will require new
apartment construction in Western Chula Vista to pay park fees. Park
Acquisition & Development (PAD) fees are currently collected only for
subdivisions, including condominium projects. It should be noted that
completion of the PIP is also necessary in order to establish specific
proposed improvements and areas of benefit, upon which equitable
impact fees can be collected.
. New multi-family projects in western Chula Vista should be required to
provide a set amount of private recreation facilities within the
development. General provisions regarding such facilities are included
in the proposed City Design Review Manual being drafted by the
Planning Department. However, those provisions amount to only broad
guidelines, and more in-depth study is necessary to develop a workable
program. Preparation of the PIP provides an opportunity to address
such a study, and the PIP should determine a minimum reasonable
project size to which such a requirement should apply.
. The Parks and Recreation Department should continue to assess the
appropriateness of "mini-parks" in western Chula Vista. While such
parks are more expensive in per-acre costs to develop and maintain,
they provide a more intimate scale for local neighborhoods, and may
be the only method by which local park deficiencies in western Chula
Vista can be remedied without significant condemnation of existing
development. Again, this re-assessment is part of the PIP's work
program.
On a more positive note, the GMOC is pleased to state that based on to-date staff
work on the PIP, a preliminary draft revised threshold standard which would apply
City-wide has been created (please refer to Appendix L). The GMOC conceptually
endorses this draft, and, based on the relationship of information in the PIP to the
possible structure and content of a final standard, recommends:
. That the City Council direct staff to finalize the draft Parks and
Recreation Threshold Standard amendment, and return it for formal
public hearing adoption with the PIP in Fall, 1995.
In closing, the Parks and Recreation Department's report noted many positive
efforts during the last year which should be recognized. Key among those are:
,;r;7/5}
Funding approval for preparation of the Otay Park Master Plan.
Funding approval for renovation of the Parkway pool and gymnasium
complex. Construction is expected to commence in September, 1995.
Completion of Phase III of the Rohr Park improvements.
Completion of Hilltop Park improvements.
Funding approval for play equipment at Lauderbach Park.
The addition of $250,000 to the Parks Acquisition and Development
(PAD) fund, bringing the total to approximately $805,000.
The opening in June, 1994, of the 12.9 acre Chula Vista Community
Park adjacent to Eastlake High School.
ADDITIONAL PROPOSED ACTIONS
Outside of the normal threshold review and reporting process, staff of the Planning
Department also brought the following two topics to the GMOC for initial review and
reaction:
Suaaested Revisions to the Annual GMOC Review Process-
At the end of last year's review, both the GMOC and staff concurred that the annual
review process requires a substantial amount of effort on both our parts. While this
in no way implies that the effort is not well spent, it did raise discussion that we
should possibly review the process to determine how it might be streamlined to
achieve mutual benefit.
The prominent suggestion brought forward by staff this year was possible
conversion to a "checklist" process similar to that employed by SANDAG in the
conduct of compliance evaluations with the Regional Growth Management Strategy
(RGMS). The RGMS is similar in approach to the City's threshold standards, and
covers the majority of our topics, as well as others. Staff indicated that using a
similar "checklist" for the GMOC's annual review could result in the GMOC work
satisfying a majority of the reporting to SANDAG, thereby reducing the burden to
conduct two similar efforts. Obviously, staff would still need to supplement for those
SANDAG RGMS topics not covered by the City's thresholds. In addition to reducing
duplicative efforts, staff indicated that the "checklist" format is designed to give
lesser attention to those aspects for which compliance has been previously
demonstrated, and to focus on those aspects which are of material concern from
year-to-year.
In response, the GMOC generally concurs with moving in such a direction provided
that the depth, breadth, and material value of the GMOC's annual review is in no
way lessened or compromised. One concern of the GMOC is that the checklist
process, through its intent to focus on outstanding issues, could result in a
weakening of the ability to monitor ongoing comprehensive conditions and changes
in non-focus threshold areas over time. Obviously, until such a revision to the
?)'~-5'f
I
annual review process is prepared and presented in greater detail, it is difficult for
the GMOC to know whether our initial concerns are warranted, and to what extent.
Therefore, in the spirit of easing the process for all concerned, the GMOC endorses
the concept of the proposed change and recommends:
. That the City Council direct the Planning Department to prepare
the draft of an annual "checklist" similar to that employed for the
RGMS, to be used in the conduct of future annual GMOC
threshold reviews. The draft checklist should be available by
October, 1995, so that the GMOC can make more specific
recommendations regarding its use as part of the upcoming
annual review process.
Draft Develooment Phasina and Monitorina Policies-
In conjunction with preparation of the HNTB SR125 study, staff noted the need to
expand and enhance the Growth Management Program's (GMP) existing
development phasing and monitoring policies, given the lead time necessary for the
planning and financing of major infrastructure. The purpose of the proposed
additional policies is to further define how the City will evaluate the status of
development approvals in forecasting the timing and phasing of new development,
and how this information should be used in updating public facility plans such as the
Transportation Phasing Program (TPP). The additional policies would improve the
City's ability to oversee the status of development activity, and ensure that the City,
other service providers, and developers become aware at the earliest possible time
of facilities that will be needed in order to maintain adopted threshold standards.
A draft of the proposed additional policies is contained in Appendix N.
During review and discussion of the initial proposed policies, the GMOC concurred
that there was a definite need for such, and generally supported their concept and
scope. There was, however, consensus that as presently worded, some of the
provisions were confusing and hard to understand as to their practical application
as part of the development review process. While not suggesting against their
adoption, the GMOC, with staffs concurrence, indicated the need to make revisions
to achieve clarity. Given this, the GMOC recommends:
. That the City Council accept in draft the proposed revisions to
the Growth Management Program's development phasing and
monitoring policies (attached as Appendix N), and direct staff to
refine them as necessary to achieve the desired clarity, and to
then return them to Council later in the Summer of 1995 for
formal public hearing adoption.
(GMOC.94\OR.ANUL.RPT)
7Jfpf
APPENDIX A
/f/->&
January 30, 1995
TO
.
.
Growth Management Oversight commi~on - J
Richard P. Emerson, Chief of Police ~
FROM
.
.
SUBJECT
Police Department Response Statistics for Fiscal Year 1993-94
Introduction
The Police Department is responsible for reporting two Quality-of-Life Threshold Standards to
the GMOC. Each of these Threshold Standards includes two statistics:
· proportion of calls for service (CFS) responded to within seven 7 minutes; and,
· average response time.
GMOC Threshold Standards. The first threshold measure is for Priority One (PI) CFS. PI
CFS include felony crimes in progress and known injury to persons or property. The threshold
standards for PI CFS are:
. 84% of all PI CFS responded to within 7 minutes (7:00); and,
· average response time for all PI CFS of four minutes and thirty seconds (4:30).
The second threshold measure is for Priority Two (P2) CFS. P2 CFS include misdemeanor
crimes in progress, possibility of injury to persons or propMy, and emergency public services
(i.e., traffic signal out). The threshold standards for P2 CFS are:
· 62% of all Priority II CFS responded to within 7:00; and,
· average response time for all P2 CFS of 7:00.
GMOC Threshold Data for FY 1993-94
Calls for Service Continue to Increase. During the current review period the Police
Department responded to 74,757 calls for service (CFS). This represents an increase of 975
CFS over FY 1992-93 and translates into a growth rate in CFS volume of 1.3% for the fiscal
year ended June 30, 1994. Despite this increase in workload, the Police Department met or
exceeded three of the four Quality-of-Life Threshold Standards established by the GMOC for
police services.
CllULit lIISTA POUCE DEPAKIJIENT
)7-5'7
Performance: Priority 1 Calls for Service. During the current review period, the Police
Department met one of the two threshold standards established for PI CFS.
· 85.4% of PI CFS were responded to within 7:00
· the average response time for all PI CFS was 4:35, five (5) seconds above the
threshold standard.
Improvement in Priority 1 CFS Performance Over the Last Two Reporting Periods. Noting
the modest shortfall, both of these measures have showed substantial improvement over the last
two reporting periods.
· In FY 1991-92, the Police Department reported that 81.2% of PI CFS were
responded to within 7:00 and that the average PI response time was 4:53.
· In FY 1992-93, the Police Department reported that 84.2% of PI CFS were
responded to within 7:00 and that the average PI response time was 4:44.
In other words, over the past two years, officers have responded to approximately 5.17% more
PI CFS within the GMOC Threshold standard of 7:00. Moreover, the average response time
has dropped by eighteen seconds or approximately 6.14%. Such improvement, made despite
a substantial workload increase, reflects the dedication and hard work of Police Department staff
on many levels.
Performance: Priority 2 Ca1Is for Service. During the current review period, the Police
Department met both of the threshold standards established for P2 CFS:
· 63.5% of all Priority IT CFS were responded to within 7:00; and,
· the average response time of for all P2 CFS period was 6:48.
On-Going Efforts to Reduce Police Response Times
As reported last year, the Police Department has made proactive policing apriority. Our
approach has been that it is more effective to prevent crime before it occurs than to respOnd to
calls for service. Staff believes the improvement in PI CFS is at least in part attributable to this
commitment. In FY 1993-94, the city expanded the School Resource Officer (SRO) Program
to four officers; implemented the Street Team, the Gang Unit, the Regional Auto Theft Task
Force (RATr), the Tactical Action Cargo Theft Team (TACT), the Sworn Staffing Overhire
Program, and a variety of Volunteer Based Programming including the Citizens Adversity
Support Team and the Police Activities League. In this report last year, staff articulated an
expectation that, based upon these new programs, response time data will continue to improve.
As anticipated, the PI CFS GMOC Threshold performance improved. However, staff is
pursuing additional efforts at this time to ensure full-compliance with GMOC standards in the
next reporting period.
CIlUU V1STA POUCE DEP~
)9'-~25
PoIit%Dq-J.._FYl993-94GrowthM_g_OtIrnighlC. . i_Report
19.3
In FY 1994-95, staff and the City Council have taken further action designed to further enhance
officer effectiveness. Building on last year's successes, the Police Overhire Program continues
to enable the department to staff the Uniform Patrol Division at a level that more closely
approximates full-staffing and the SRO Program was doubled from two to four officers.
Volunteer programs were also expanded to include a Senior Volunteer Patrol Program (SVPP).
SVPP provides a variety of supplementary public safety and community services like vacation
house checks, parking enforcement and license enforcement. Additionally, the annual Patrol
Staffing study resulted in the addition of 1.0 Peace Officer mid-year. Staff also implemented
a revised shift staffing plan for the Uniform Patrol Division that reduced selected shift overlaps
by 50% resulting in a more effective deployment of officers. Finally, the Police Department
recently received tentative approval to hire 4.0 Peace Officers as part of the first phase of the
Crime Bill. Staff is proceeding with the application process to finalize this award.
Staff has also completed the planning process for PS-1l5, the Public Safety Communications
Project. Staff anticipates that the first phase of PS-1l5, referred to in previous GMOC
documents as the CAD System, will be in-place by late 1995. Additional phases which include
automated records management, field reporting and mobile digital terminals will come on-line
in early 1996. These systems will have a significant impact on staff productivity and, as
recommended last year, it may be appropriate to reflect upon the current GMOC Threshold
standards once some staff has some experience with these new systems.
Based upon these new programs, staff expects that response time data will continue to improve
and that the Police Department will comply with all GMOC Quality-of-Ufe Threshold Standards
during the next reporting period.
cc: Jobn D. Goss
SjlI'W. Morris
~ Batchelder
PD Staff
Captains (3)
Uentenanls (7)
Sergeants (17)
Mid-MlIIIllgen (6)
CHULA. VISTA POLICE DEPAJrl'MENT
) r; <-~1
APPENDIX B
)i-ktl
MEMORANDUM
DATE:
February 8, 1995
FROM:
Growth Management Oversight Commission
John D. Goss, City Manage~
James B. Hardiman, Fire Chief 9" If-
Fire Department Response Data: Fiscal Year 1993-94
TO:
VIA:
SUBJECT:
This report serves to update the Commission on the performance of the Fire Department in
responding to various emergencies in Chula Vista. The Fire Department continues to maintain
the highest level of response efficiency possible. Provided for your information are the 1994
calendar year statistics on calls for service in the area. Overall call volume increased over 1993
by 2%, with medical aid calls (nearly 70% of Chula Vista's call volume) increasing by 5%.
The current Fire Department Threshold Standard requires that 85% of all emergency calls for
service be responded to within seven minutes (7:00). For Fiscal Year 1993/94, the data
collected indicates that the Chula Vista Fire Department responded to 80% of the emergency
calls within 7 minutes (7:00); 85% of the calls were responded to within 7 minutes, 26 seconds
(7:26).
As discussed last year, it is the new method by which data is collected and measured which has
caused a change in our response statistics; the Fire Department level of service has not
diminished. The 26 second variation from compliance is attributable to various factors:
. Accurate collection of the data and times associated with each response time event
(recall that Response Time is the total of: Call Intake Time, Dispatch Time, Turnout Time,
and Travel Time);
. Call Intake Time being measured now, but not included in the formulation of the original
Standard (could be adding 20 to 60 seconds to the overall response times);
It is suggested, as in previous discussions, that the installation of the Computer-Aided Dispatch
system will offer significant assistance in collecting accurate times and streamlining the call
intake and dispatch process, thereby providing a system to better measure performance and
compliance. The Fire Department joins with the Police Department in eagerly awaiting its
installation and implementation later this year.
Should you have any questions on this or other Fire Department issues, I can be reached at
691-5055.
Chulll Vistll Fire Depllrtment
ICJ ~d> /
INCIDENT RESPONSE REPORT
CALENDAR YEAR 1884
AREA
NUMBER OF INCIDENTS BY AREA
(As Dispatched by South Bay Dispatch)
t OF CALLS
% OF TOTAL
Chula Vista
National City
Imperial Beach
Bonita/Sunnyside F.P.D.
Other
7703
3345
1660
588
532
56%
24%
12%
4%
4%
Total
13828
100%
INCIDENTS IN CHULA VISTA
TYPE INCIDENT t OF CALLS % OF TOTAL
Medical Aid 5302 69%
False Alarms 785 10%
Fires: Total 682 11%
Structure 204 3%
Grass, Trash, Misc. 451 6%
Vehicle 207 3%
Other Citizen Assists 507 7%
Hazardous Conditions 220 3%
lAIr Other 27 >1%
Total 7703 100%
INCIDENT RESPONSES BY FIRE COMPANY
STAnON APPARATUS t OF CALLS MO. AVERAGE % OF TOTAL
Station 1 Rescue 87 2174 181 23%
Station 5 Eng.25 2155 180 22%
Station 3 Eng.23 1354 113 14%
Station 2 Eng.22 1268 106 13%
Station 1 Eng.21 1044 87 11%
Station 1 Truck 71 777 65 8%
Station 4 Eng.24 565 47 6%
Station 6 Eng.26 277 23 3%
TOTALS 8614 801 100%
/9 -j,,:J-
APPENDIX C
/5' /j" /
Air Pollution Control Board
Greg Cox District I
Dianne Jacob Distrid 2-
Pam SIJler Disrrid .~
Ron Roberrs . Oisrrid 4
Bill Horn Di~rricr 5
,;
Air Pollution Control Officer
R. J. Sommerville
March 30,1995
Ed Batchelder
Senior Planner
Planning Department
City of Chula Vista
276 Founh Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMITTEE (GMOC)
MEETING - APRIL 6, 1995
Please fmd enclosed and listed below, documents for the Growth Management Oversight
Committee (GMOC) meeting on April 6, 1995. You will note that the package does not
include a 1994 Annual Progress Report on the Regional Air Quality Strategy (RAQS). The
District is preparing a triennial update on the RAQS, but it is not currently available. The
District can make that report available to you when it is complete.
List of major sources located in ChuIa Vista, including the types and
amounts of pollutants emitted by those sources.
Computer printout of all commercial and industrial sources in ChuIa Vista.
Computer printouts of Chula Vista facilities issued Notices of Violation
(NOVs) and Notices to Comply (NTCs) in 1994.
1994 Accomplishments
The 1993 Annual Report on Air Quality.
The 1994 Air Pollution Control District (APCD) Scorecard.
Copy of the Federal Register reclassifying the San Diego Ozone
Nonatta;nment Area from Severe to Serious.
List of District Rules and Regulations.
A copy of the current Air News on recent District Activities.
Regarding the City's Air quality Threshold Standard, I would be glad to meet with you and
San Diego Association of Governments (SANDAG) staff to discuss possible revis10ns to
the Standard. As the District has communicated in the past, SANDAG is the agency that
coordinates development forecasts with local jurisdictions and provides regional growth
Fj-t i
9150 Chesapeake Drive. San Diego. California 92123-1096. (619) 694-3307
FAX (619) 694-2730 . Smoking Vehicle Hotline 1-800-28-SMOKE
( "21'--, ,,,,K.,,.;.-,,,',;,,-,
Ed Batchelder
Senior Planner
Planning Department
City of Chula Vista .
March 30, 1995
2
forecasts to the District for air quality planning. SANDAG is also responsible for
developing regional Growth Management Strategy and conducting transponation
conformity. Accordingly, SANDAG should be consulted in evaluating potential revisions
to the Threshold Standard
I hope this information meets your needs. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate
to call me (694-3303) or Paul Davis (694-3339) of my staff.
~D~ t~
MORRIS E. DYE
Deputy Director (Acting)
MED:ndi
Enclosures
cc: Paul Davis
19/t~
Q) h',.,.~ ~ ,,'-,,~~,,)
~<:>-.~~~..,'" ' .. --" ~,~
0) MtyF s,~CS)
.
OK li1l. 1._11 122.
..~ tr....ctloa read OBI,.,
_lMt l~.i4Leoa..owzaer.".loa_.treet___,loc_.tr..t_D_.loc_clty,
1oa_dp r... pp14 1
"'r. (1oc_sip . '1'10 or loe_stp . '1'11 or loe_aip . '1'13
or 1oclI_stp . '1'14. or loa_slp . '1'15) aDd
_lete (..lect. p.l4Jnaa,p.l4-co4e frca pppo p where
11.1~ . p.l~_ oD4 1.1~c04. . p.l~c04.1 oD4
(po_etatu. . 'A'))
- bJ' .....
m__ m_eooa _
LDC:...ftUft__
1712' A
IIlIPLU ft
DBA
LDC: SIP
7 m.BV1lii POOD 8'fOUS
0000' 1910
LOC_B'l'RBB'I'_1IOM
LDC:_,,%ft
7
~ COllI'
CIlULlt. nsorA
05.12 A
IULL'rO' IIJl
0'20' A
__or
OstOO A
._ft
03718 A
Itft
8923' A
_ft
7 ItLWml POOP _s
0000' 1911
7 ItLWml IPOOD 8'fOIUlS
0000' 1910
7 ItLWmI IPOOD S'r01UlS
0000' 1911
AItQOI_1IIDI'l'lt.L
0000' 1911
~ COllI'
1182
CIlULlt. nsn
~ COllI'
."
CIlULlt. nsn
'01
~cou
CIlULlt. V%ftA
317
CIlULlt. nsn
311
UJIL8 AU'fO BOM . PADI'f'
0000' 1911
CIlULlt. nsn
0'121 A _ora CIWlLItII %II
3m> AV CIlULlt. nsn
9325. A .....,_ A !IUD . ~ ..... .
IlUI.. cor .110 CIlULlt. nftA
.1115 A A . It IIC
~'I' CII'OLa V%ftA
1127
~ COLLlSI_ C3M'fta
0000' 1'11
~ MAftIlIlt.L 'rIICIIIIOLOOIItS
0000' 1911
.........
'-0
~
\'--
750
ALL ~~ CLaADU .2
0000' 1910
>>....PllDft 'rIICIIIIOLOOIltS %I
0000' 1'11
It.IlCO .1353
0000' 1910
It.IlCO .6138
0000' 1910
It.IlCO All .. IIDII IWIItft .1911
0000. 1910
It.IlCO PIlIIlI'fI08 sn'rIoa IIC .On3
0000' 1911
It.IlCO '_1. rnorIOIIlI DIe '520'
0000' 1910
It.IlCO .IUlftI08 sn'rIOIIlI DIe '5217
0000' 1910
It.IlCO .unI. sn'rIOIIS DIe .5211
0000' 1911
790
0512. A
IWlIIItLL m>
037.. A
8IllWlIIlt.T
1700
.....DLD _.......- ..AI.
CIlULlt. nsn
_ 'a.AllICH CO IIC
CIlULlt. nrn
196
01'7'" a-=o r-..u<<.~. CO %.::
ftLmJ>n _ m> eJluLlt. V%ftlt.
195
037,. A
Itft
037.. A
._ft
01171 A
Itft
01079 A
3D AY
A-=o .-4*.1. CO J.:
CIlULlt. nrn
_ r_~ CO IIC 16123
CIlULlt. nftA
720
.00
aaco r-.--.. CO %.: .53.7
CIlULlt. nrn
107
aaco ~III CO ~ .54,0.
CIlULlt. VIftA
llIICO PIlOIlOC'1'S CO DIe '5110
CBULA. VIS'!'A
791
1725
01065 A
BRollD",..,
03712 A
MI. ...
lUICO .aollOCft CO DIe '1925
CRULl. VIS'I'A
ARea .08'1'108 S'tA'fIOHS XtIC' '601
0000' 1911
31'0
"' 0 . 0 .. .
0 .. .. 0 . .. .. .. . 0 .. .. ... 0 .. .. 0
" . . .. 0 .. . .. .. "' .. . ... .. .. .. .. "' 0 .. 0 0
. .. .. .. .. ... . . .. . .. .. .. "' ... .. .. .. "' "' .. .
..
11
.
l! :l II t
= B R !
:: i. S II
& 2 i ~ ;;:
II 112. ·
18~ i~ ~ I~ i.' I, i, I, I, i, 'IM~ I~ il~ ~~ I~ ~ ~ = ~~ ;~ t=~~
~ ~~. · · I- ~... .~. · . · .~. · · · · D_ Da .
~ "!" i" " "Uri Dri ~" ." m" "8" "." " " " " " "~"
"' "' i", "' S"' "'~"' I"' I"' "' "' "' "' I"' I"' "' I"' I"' I"' I"' i"' "'
o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
o ~o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ~o 0 0.0 0 0 0 0 0 0
o ~o 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0 0 ~o 0 0 0 0 0 0
S" ~o 10 ;0 20 I" I" " 0 I" &0 u" ~o " 0 ~o " " " 0 0 i"
Ie e E E E E ~ ~ E ~ E e ~ E ~ E E E ~ E e e
I~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ e e ~ e ~ ~ 5 ~ 5 ~ ~ ~ e ~ ~ ~
II I II I I 1;1 1.1 I ~I I I 1,,1 II I ~I I I I I
I I g.. ~ S 5 ~ !
I I Iii i i~; I Ii i I
. ~. I ~I i
.Ii c c= c= c c c~ c CIi.1 C c~ C C~ CI C. CIi C cl ci. c
1.1 I = ~ = I = ~ I = 1=.
= ~Ii: ~ :Ii =.. =1 :.. = ~ :.. ~ =Ii: = :. ~g :Ii =; = :..:=
~ 0 " ft 0 ... ~. 0 ~ ~." 0 0 " O~ ~ ~ M5" ~..
:. :- = = =. g~ g :~ = ; a~ = gu: = :.: :-: : :~ s~
/'J~~ 1
." 0 0'" 0 0
~ ~ 0 a ~ ." ~ ~ : : = = : : ~ : ~ : : = : =
. ~ w . ~ ." . W W " ~ ... . ~ ~ ." ~ ~ ~ " . ...
!J
E ~ :;
s i
..~ i - =
II .. ..
E Ii I .~s ~=
~E iMi~i ii~~ i ~II!~
~o 0 0 ... ... 0 ~o ~ 0 0 ... ." U'" 0 0 ~ " ...~... ... 0 ...
~" ~" M" I" " " " '"~" "I" i" I" I" u" 2" " "~" "i" c"
~ ..~ . . . .!. . .~. . . . . . . . . . . .
o 0 ~o 0 0.0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0.0 0 0
~g ~g wg g Ig ~g Bg ;g Eg g ~g g g g ~g gg !g 9g Rg.g g ag
50 50 50 0 80 ~o 80 aO!O 0 ~o 0 ~o =0 ~o ~o &0 go go .0 .0 !o
I I I I I ~ I I =1 I I I I I I I I ~ I ~ ~ ~
i i i i i i i i Ii i i i i i i i i i i i i i
I S
oil
i I S
.. ~
'" "'
I = II II .. ~
C e e.. ell e e.. e.. Co e . ell e.. e.. e ell el ei e.. e~ ell ell ~.. c
.. !J. =... . =
!I: !Il 51 e~ =D ~I :1 =Il 51l ~I :1 =1 Sa ~I: ~ =i ~~ :1 :~ i~ :1 =D
~~ ~~ ~ wi wI 0 "I w~ "_ ~~ ~ 0 o~.d = .I~. 0; .i ~. .1 N~
~ 0 0 0 0 0 . . . . 0 .0. . . 0 . . . 0 0
Ie; -d>Y
0110t & IIASAJm . . CCJn'aAC'rIm co
7ft . _ _ c:JIIJU 1/%lIft 0000' 1'11
OJ731 & DIIft p_ ftUCIt UIft'lIL 110
~8ftDL .. c:JIIJU 1/%11'I'& 0000' 1110
05,n & ImJPU PUeU%1* PJoODIIlC.U %1Ie 1115
BaA.u........ AY c:JIIJU 1/%11'I'& 00009 1'11
OJllt & % . . UP.... au t55
&11'I' eIIlILA 1/%11'I'& 0000' 1'10
01137 & ~ 'IIIIID% i1 11'I' uQUOa 701
............'1' eIIlILA VUft 0000' 1110
15231 & .:nul AV"rO IIODI' . IfOIfIIIO It
IIIIQIIIlIIAlr c:JIIJU 1/%11'I'& 0000' 1110
HOlD & DlIft COlICU8%OII8 %lie
M&T loUD unnoa/ll1lUft aD c:JIIJU 1/%11'I'& 0000' 1'13
'0197 & L . DIII1I9IlftlU %lie 252t
-11'I'. c:JIIJU Y.tll'l'& 0000' 1'11
'2279 & __~C La .JOLLa lIllLU CO 170
DCB 11'I' c:JIIJU Y.tll'l'& 0000' 1'11
15212 & LIl%DLaIl ....,. lITII'I'DIlI III
_111' eIIlILA Y.tll'l'& 0000' 1'11
"- Ol09t & LLDnI ..... COIft'Ill)L CO %lie 2115
-11'I' c:JIIJU 1/%11'I'& 0000' 1'11
'-.JJ 11111 & LOn. ~ IIllIUt 2555
~ F&rIU 11'I' IJ c:JIIJU 1/%11'I'& 0000' 1'11
02372 & LIIIIII . FLU. %lie 370
~ 'IIIIl1IlIIlI\Y _ eIIlILA 1/%11'I'& 0000' 1110
1120t & L'I<lII IILBC'I'UC CO %lie 2715
_11'I'1& eIIlILA Y.tllft 0000' 1'11
I5U2 & ......~ YlLa'l II . . &11'10 IIOIIY . panrr 1077
_T eIIlILA Y.t1l'l'1I 0000' 1911
01097 & IWlCO &11'10 p&DftDll 01' eIIlILA 1/%lIft 2120
-11'I' CIIlILIl Y.tll'l'& 0000' 1'11
'3111 & ........- . LaIl%ft1' ....... 2521
_ 11'I' Cd eIIlILA 1/%11'I'& 00009 1'11
050&9 & _DR BDnCII I ~~DL IlYIIQ CO 10'
-11'I' eIIlILA Y.tll'l'& 0000' 1'11
0212' & _. IIOIIY noP 310
&11'I' c:JIIJU Y.tll'l'& 0000' 1'11
Inn & II%LD '100 II%LD 3211
_ 11'I' .1/2 eIIlILA 1/%11'I'& 0000' 1'11
onl5 & _u '02
JaD &V eIIlILA 1/%11'I'& 0000' 1'11
OUt7 II _u I IttD8 &11'10 ..pan 300
.11'I' CBDLA VI8"1"A 0000' 1110
'-.....
'-.()
\
"-J
~
".1.1" .
UP"" ft
N11J A
1ft
0&151 A
".,..... c&IIIW aD
AL_ CD08C%DCI
CIIULk nl'fA
00255 A
7'111 . IIADI ftI
02551 A
_ QUAIIT ID
'1"7 A . ~ JMU
7'111 I IIADI ftI
CIIULk Y!ftA
CIIULk nl'fA
Cl'l'AT
Cl'l'AT
Cl'l'AT
11071 A
OImD Ava . CIIULk nftA
'0150 A
IIADI ft ID CIIULk nI'fA
'&131 A LIIII_'__
. ft I CIIULk nI'fA
03141 A
31D AV CIIULk nI'fA
11175 A .llCII'IC D~ .......LaW TIC
Cl'l'AT VlU.LIIT ID CIIULk nftA
01011 II
Cl'l'AT La'DUa
171" A
IIADI ft tee
"11
00175 A "
2l1li ft .
11050 A
IIADI ft
'OlU A
.ALmIM .. te
'2013 A
'IBDD Ava
... Duao
CIIULk nftA
_ ~nma . .'_.&ftDlJ eo
c:BDLa. YJ:nA
CIIULk nftA
CII1ILll nl'fll
'l1li DIonne. AJlIIT
CIIULk nl'fA
..
00301 II
_or . ft
17113 A
AIII'I'A ft
11101 II
lIUUft ID
0501& I
31D a.,
050'. A
)_ A.V
;'1',
..
CIIULk Y!ftA
CIIULk Y!ftA
CIIULk nl'fA
CRULa. VIS'l"A
CIIU... VlHA
MOBIL OIL eon
0000' 1111
..XL on. COItPOIIA.'rIOII
0000' 1110
_II. OIL COUOIIAne.
0000' 1110
...- I _
0000' 1111
..... . --
0000' 1111
....- AIID 8LOll11 eo TIC
0000' 1111
IICI . IIA8T AlI'I'OIlOI>T . .Anft'
0000' 1110
OAJ[ LAIID eo
0000' 1111
0IIJl IIllOIl IIIUlftlIUIO
0000' 1'10
.llCII'IC IIILL
0000' 1110
PAC'DIC D%AIIOIID Pn'IlOLmJII :tlIC
0000' 1111
.ACII'IC _
0000' 1111
I'llCD1'C - ,. DC
0000' 1111
3
115
.0.
101
2.12
liS
.20
4130
2550
120
PA'ICO 8Pa:DL'I'Da DIe
0000' 1110
IlAICIUI . A . __ _ I1III 1IIllI 3U.
0000' 1111
1lADL'. AO'I'O BODY . pAXft 7tO
0000' 1111
..._ TIC
0000' 1110
__DC.
0000' 1110
ImlIIIl ftIICII: UII'rAL
0000' 1111
. D CnT
0000' 1110
. D CIft'I' CIBII 8VC MY ItBOIOHL C"I'R
0000' 1110
. D CII'I'T OBH svc, I 8 BAY ItBG C'1'It
0000' 1110
131
135
1500
570
570
III .. .. III .. . .. .. . .
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. III .. . . .. .. .. III . .. .
. . . .. .. . III .. .. .. .. III III .. .. .. .. ... III .. . ..
. .. .. .. .. . .. . .. III .. . ... .. ... .. .. .. .. ... .. .
.. I
I
.. .. M
II .. .. .. .. .. I
.. .. .. .. .. .. M
i ~ . . . . . .
01\ 01\ III 01\ 01\ 01\ E ..
III III III III 01\ 01\ ..
.. .. .. .. .. .. I i .
i . . . . . . ~ ..
.. .. .. .. .. .. I a I
~ .. .. .. .. .. .. M
e . . . . . . r; ~ t s
9 M ~= ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ t .... .
I:: ~ . II
a.. i:: ..
i: sa 8.. 8.. 15 8.. 80 80 8.. 80 15 Ii h .... Ill:: h
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..:: ...
... ... .. ;1= ;1= .... .... ;1= ;I" .. .. Ii e=
.... .. .. s: .. .... .... 0: II" Ii Ii ..
e.. e ll.. 0 0.. 0.. 0.. 0 Ill..
II:: .. .. .. .. ;:: .. Ii II
0" .0 0 i~ I~ Ii i~ Ii :18 i~ :18 I~ i~
0 0 .. .8 ag ..
",0 ",0 .... a8 a8 118
.0 0 .. 0
. . . .
I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I
I i I I i I II I Iii I I i I ii I
~ I I I
K v I .
III t II
~."=II :1" :1 :'11 :"1. :11 :'1 :i~ :; =0"=11
~ =B" ~ " 0 . ~
~~ ~ .1 ~~ ~ ~ ~ 0 .. ~~
o 0 0 0 0 0 . 0 . 0
II
;~ ii ;i ;;
a 0 . 0
II
"I "=
ii is
o 0
"I: "
U ~:
J9~?/
e e
~ M~
I II
e
!
.
I
"I: "I:
dn
. 0
e
~
I
e e
.. ..
> >
i i
..
~
i
=
: ~ ~." >11"
=1 fI'I'"
.. 0
02.11 A 8OPBRXOR AU'l'O BODY 363
.... CII1ILIl.Vl:lI'1'A 00009 1110
01512 A IIIW"T1II'A!'D AO'I'IIOa%ft I WA'I'D. DXlI'f 761
.... CII1ILIl.Vl:lI'fA 00009 1110
0155& A IIWD'ftfA'fta 'DIlIC*' .:IGB 8CIIOOL DIB'!' 1130
5ft A" CII1ILIl.Vl:lI'1'A 00009 lt11
'2031 A ."_IWA.... OIIICM aXOB 8CIIOOL DJ:ft. -.ftA.... 0Itt0ll BICDI 8CIIOOL DIST. 1120
DII'l'LIID ._V CIIVLA. VI"A 00009 1115
0&101 A IfDM:O "'DUm . DJtD'fDIQ DIe ftXACO RD'nrnJO . IlAltD'rDlO De 1291
3e A" CIIULA. VISTA 0000' 1911
03t12 A ftDCO ..._ . _DIll De ftDCO .....ntDIO . IIARD'l'IIIO De 1'9.
IdLIlO8Jl A" CII1ILIl. YUlB 0000' lt11
01722 A ftDCO ..._ . DJtD'fDIQ De ftXACO ItUIIIDD . DJtD'fDIQ De '02
_V C'IIVLA. VI:S"lA 0000' 1110
01'5& A ftIlun OXL CO &01
'1'IILmMM CAImlII ec_ .1071 CII1ILIl.Vl:_ 00009 1110
01&&1 A ftIlUft OXL CO I"
.... 1_' 101 CII1ILIl.Vl:lI'1'A 00009 1910
01&71 A i'RIl%P'l'r OXL CO '15' 1'01
.XLLTOP IlIl . CII1ILIl.Vl:lI'1'A 0000' 1110
'--. to0l2 A 'rOlIBJl lI'fIUIC'IIIU8 De lilt
~ ~A" CII1ILIl. 'nftA 00009 1911
\ 01012 A . DO U 1&0
~ ~y CII1ILIl.Vl:lI'fA 00009 lt11
11131 A mrrrm .~L 8DVIC2 2300
~... CII1ILIl. YUI'I'A 00009 1913
1t0l& A UIIOCAL un
..... CII1ILIl. Vl:...A 00009 1110
0&1'2 A -- UIIOCAL '211' 201
-<)-DDY CII1ILIl.Vl:lI'1'A 00009 1910
0&11& A UIIOCAL.5221 Itl
......~y eJIDLA Vl:lI'1'A 0000' lt11
OIIt' A UIIOCAL .57&3 1&95
MM' aftln A'I CII1ILIl. V%lI'l'A 00009 lt10
0&701 A UIIOCAL'UU tI
..uA e CII1ILIl. nlI'l'A 00009 1110
03511 A .1 POlI'l'AL 8DV%C8 750
3e A" CII1ILIl. 'nftA 00009 1110
05110 A .1 _ALl De 501
C'" CII1ILIl. Vl:...A 00009 1110
1t122 A 'IALLMl'1'A DOlI WORD 2555
.uvu ... 1& CII1ILIl.Vl:lI'fll 00009 ltll
tl0l5 A W%LL%IIII eua'l'%I COL8111111 1fBB'I' COAft conn: ROAS'l'D.S 7&7
AIJI'1'A n 'A CBULa. VI"A 00009 1911
"'
.. "'
.. ..
.. ..
5
fto 80
~~ li~
Ii Ii
i~ ~
II I
i
i
~
1
..
:1 :~ L
== =. 2:
. 0 : =
..
=
J9-?Y'
1992 DATABET - SITES' ESTIMATED ACTUAL EMISSIONS �\
++• Includes large landfills • ++
(Emissions in tons /year)
ID NOS.
FACILITY
TBP PM10
80!
NOZ
TOO
ROO
CO
- - - - ---
------ --- ---- ---- - - -- --
- --- -- -
- - --
- - - --
-- -- --
- - - - --
- - -- --
- ----
594
AABCO INC
0
0
0
0
!
9
0
594A
808 CEDAR ST. w
SAN DIEGO
2069
ADVANCED ELECTROMAGNE
0
0
0
0
25
8
0
2069A
9257 MISSION GORGE R
BANTEE
4184
ADVANCED STRUCTURES I
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6194A
1315 ARMORLITE DR
SAN MARCOS
6721
ADVANCED STRUCTURES I
0
0
0
0
13
11
0
86080A
2181 MEYERS AVE.
ESCONDIDO
7199
AGGRERO INC.
1
1
0
14
1
1
3
$$ILIA
187 MACE ST
CHULA VISTA
6979
ALCOA ELECTRONIC PAKA
0
0
0
0
40
22
0
87090A
16710 VIA DEL CAMPO
BAN DIEGO
6461
ALDILA INC
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
BS`2A
4879 RONSON CT
SAN DIEGO
6939
ALDILA INC.
0
0
0
0
65
29
0
87050A
15822 BERNARDO CENTS
BAN DIEGO
3314
ALTURDYNE INC
0
0
0
1
4
4
0
3314A
666 STEELE ST
EL CAJON
7177
AMAN BR08 INC.
2
0
0
2
D
0
0
89088A
PORTABLE
BAN DIEGO
2344
AMERICAN TOOL 6 ENGIN
0
0
0
0
13
13
0
2344A
7485 TRADE ST.
BAN DIEGO
415
APPLIED ENERGY (NAV 8
28
28
1
S9
36
4
39
415A
08 NAVAL STATION 32N
SAN DIEGO
149
APPLIED ENERGY INC
14
14
1
42
19
2
5
15A
USN TRAINING CENTER
BAN DIEGO
5270
APPLIED ENERGY INC.
21
21
3
57
27
3
12
54A
NAB NORTE ISLAND
SAN DIEGO
201
ARCO
0
0
0
0
31
28
0
201A
2295 E HARBOR DR
SAN DIEGO
0
ARTS i CRAFTS PRESS
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
BB101A
1949 WALNUT •
SAN DIEGO
(LINE1 7POLL ADDRE88ES) Page i ) / - "? 23- NAR -95
.
10 1I0S. I'AC ILl TY TSP PIUO SO][ 110][ TOO ROO CO
------- ----------------------- ------ ----- ----- ------ ------ ------ -----
un ASPIlALT IIIC 20 13 3 2 3 2 2
1IA SLAOGJlTIUOO81 CYlf/H LAltISIDI
5711 ATI INDOSTRIIS 0 0 0 0 2 2 0
5711A 2425 VIIIEYARD AV. W BSCOIIDIDO
2700 AZTIC PIRLITI CO IIIC 2 1 0 2 0 0 0
2700A 1511 8IIlPSOII WY BSCOIIDIDO
1537 BARNB8 BIND/BYDROCtJRV 0 0 0 0 154 0 0
1537A 8006 BHGIIIIBR RD 8U OliGO
7734 BAY DICKIIIG CO IIIC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10152A PORTABLI SU DllGO COtnlTY
7504 BONNEVILLI PACIPIC CO 1 1 0 U U 11 U
U31B 8Ul BALBOA Ava SAlI DIIGO
7421 BOCK DIVBS INC 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
8tU8A 315 BRADLBY AV IL CAJOII
UI BOCK DIva8 IIIC. 0 0 0 0 u 0 0
5318A 1100 OLD BLVD BL CUOII
661 CALBIOCBBK CORPORATIO 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
66lA 10133 TORRIY PIII18 R
2094 CALDERA SPAS 0 0 0 0 38 U 0
2094A 1080 BRADLIY AVB. W BL CAJON
US CALIP LAUNDARY . LIlli 0 0 0 6 0 0 1
UA 101 UTH 8'1' 8U DllGO
7427 CALIP PRICISIOII PRODO 0 0 0 0 I 1 0
IU3tA 7727 POJUroLA PL 8U DllGO
6656 CALIP 8'1' DIPT OP CORR 2 2 0 14 8 2 40
"017A 480 ALTA RD 8U YSIDRO
5957 CALIFORNIA COKKBRCIAL 11 13 0 7 8 4 I
5957A .235 CAMIllO 8AIITA PI 8U OliGO
8370 CALIFORNIA POBLI8HING 0 0 0 0 2 2 0
tlUOA 1000 PIONIBR WAY BL CUOII
6272 CALIPORNIA WOOD DISI 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
6272A 2UO )fATOII AV 8U DllGO
8711 CALLAWAY GOLF CO 0 0 0 0 4 0 0
85027B 6241 YARROW DR 'I CARLSBAD
8360 CALLAWAY GOLP CO. 0 0 0 0 140 3 0
11419A 2285 ROTHBRPORD RD. CARLS.AD
(LINZ1_7POLL_ADDRISSI8) paq. 2 17- ?..->- U-KAJt-ts
ID IIOS. FACILITY TSP PM10 SOl NOI TOO ROO CO
-----,-- ----------------------- ------ ----- ----- ------ ------ ------ -----
63 CALMAT CO '5 51 1 3 5 3 4
3241. BY 76/7 MI B BY I 15 PALA
1301 CAIJOoT CO 142 73 0 0 0 0 0
63061. 10050 BLACJt MOmrrAIIr SAN DIEGO
881 CAIJOoT CO " 34 0 0 0 0 0
8811. 3605 DEBESA JU) BL CAJON
56 CAIJOoT CO 73 37 0 0 0 0 0
89125A 2240 STADIOX WY SAN DIRGO
2037 CALMAT CO. 3 0 0 0 0 0 0
20371. 10"5 BBELD CANYON pony
322 CALMAT CO/CONROCJt DIV 20 11 0 0 0 0 0
3221. 12060 HY " S L1l.ltESIOB
158 CAMPBELL MARINI DIV 0 0 0 0 10 10 0
571. FOOT OF BIGBft AVB SAN DUGO
1531 CAPB COMPOSITES INC. 0 0 0 0 21 1 0
15204A 7014 CARROLL JU) SAN DIRGO
I" CARPINTD TBC1DfOLOGY 0 0 0 0 16 12 0
"A 1717 COYAMACA ST. . BL CAJON
519 CASPIAN, INC. 0 0 0 0 7 7 0
51tA U 51 RUFFIN ROAD SAN DIEGO
6"2 CERCOM IIrC. 0 0 0 0 I I 0
..022A lUO WATSON WAY VISTA
100 CBD TRONICS INC 0 0 0 0 27 7 0
721. 1150 W BRAJ)LBY AV BL CAJON
1918 CBBVRON USA INC 0 0 0 0 35 35 0
1918A 2351 . BARBOR DR SAN DIRGO
1103 CBILCOTB IllC U 14 1 21 2 2 5
11031. 2110 FLITCBBR P1tWY I BL CAJON
1713 CBILDREN'S HOSPITAL 1 1 0 121 23 5 131
150"A 1001 FROST ST SAN DIEGO
1017 CLBATOR CORPORATION 0 0 0 0 17 , 0
1017A 8725 PRODUCTION AV SAN DIEGO
.... COKPUTBR SCIENCBS COR 3 3 0 11 7 1 1
t22UA 5021 KEARNY VILLA RD SAN DIIGO
_451 CONTINENTAL MARITIMB 2 2 0 0 16 16 0
5051A UU BAY FRONT SAN DIEGO
(LIIIll 7POLL ADDRESSBS) paq. 3 J5'~J~ 23-MAR-95
- -
ID NOS. FACILITY TSP PM10 SOX NOX TOG ROO CO
------- ----------------------- ------ ----- ----- ------ ------ ------ -----
15 CUBIC CORP 0 0 0 1 , 1 0
'SA 9333 BALBOA AV SAN DIIGO
U76 CUMMINS POWU GIlNERAT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
U148A I7' , 52 lfAllNER SPRINGS
6282 CUSTOM CRAFT MARBLI 0 0 0 0 11 11 0
U82A 10848 lfBBATLANDS AV 8ANTBE
6851 CU8TOM CRAFT MARBLI 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
IU11A 93 53 ABJLu)'.J( WAY SANTII
25 DALlY CORP 2 0 0 0 0 0 0
"A 2400 Mt1RPIIY CANYON 8Al1 DIIGO
7315 DI IfAJU)I CORP 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
8U07A 1001 BRADLBY AV. W. BL CAJON
701 DILUXB CHBCK PRINTU 0 0 0 0 7 4 0
70lA 4075 80JUtBlfTO VALLE 8AN DIIGO
67U DIPOSITIOIf TICBlfOLOOY 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
1'077A 4540 VIBlfRIDGB AV SAlI DIIGO
5940 DESALINATION SYSTBMB 0 0 0 0 29 U 0
5940A 1231 SIMPSOIf 1fY IA BSCONDIDO
UO' DEUTSCH CO 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
UOUA 32'5 PRODUCTION AVE OCBAJlSIDI
'01 DBUTSCH COMPANY 0 0 0 0 25 7 0
SOlA '80 XUNICIPAL AIRPOR OCBAJlSIDI
5931 DIATIK IlfC. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
5938A 7420 CARROLL RD. 8Al1 DUGO
71U DLe , C IlfC 1 1 0 7 1 0 1
'0270A 10201 CBAlflfBL RD LAltBSIDB
71 DYNA GRAPHIC8 INC 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
71A 6200 YARROW DR CARLS BAD
'985 DCIMA rrJl POLLOTIOII 1 1 16 U It 15 50
'98SA 6200 AVEIIIDA DCI1fA8 CARLSBAD
U17 DERGY I'ACTORS 0 0 0 1 1 0 1
U17A 10150 VIA I'RONTBRA 8Al1 DIIGO
UU DUGY I'ACTOR8 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
UUA 16701 BBJUO.RDO DR. . 8A11 DIIGO
27 ISCONDIDO READY MIX It 35 0 2 2 1 2
103A 7500 XIS8ION GORGI 8Al1 DIIGO
;~IlfEl_7POLL_ADDRIS818) "98 4 /'1- ?? U-MAR-95
ID NOS. FACILITY TSP PM10 SOl NOI TOG ROG CO
------- ----------------------- ------ ----- ----- ------ ------ ------ -----
H8 PENTON B 0 MATERIAL C 111 48 0 0 0 0 0
138A 9255 CAMINO SANTA F SAN DIEOO
lU 'ENTON B 0 MATERIAL C 13 . 0 0 0 0 0
UtA 9300 FRIARS RD SAN DlIGO
SS' 'ENTON B 0 MATERIAL C 12 22 0 0 0 0 0
SUA 2266 WILLOW OLD RD EL CAJO.
1835 'ENTON BO MATBRIALS C 26 13 0 0 0 0 0
8unA 27'. BARKON OROVE ESCONDIDO
135 'ENTON MATERIAL co. SS 21 0 0 0 0 0
USA BY 76, 4 MILES EAST PALA
6153 PILTERITB 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
U53A 4116 SORRBNTO VALLEY SAN DIEGO
5U6 FLUID SYSTBMB CORP 0 0 0 0 U 11 0
5616A 10054 OLD OROVE RD SAN DIBGO
7691 FORNACA 'AMILY BAKBRY 0 0 0 0 t4 t4 0
'010'A 206' ALDBRGROVE AV ESCONDIDO
935 FRAzn PAINT 1 1 0 0 at at 0
)35A 6125 MIllAMAll RD SAIl DIEGO
SSI1 FUJITSU MICROBLBCTRON 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
SS I1A 4181 RUF'IN ROAD SAIl DlIGO
4237 OEC MARCONI MATBRIALS 0 0 0 0 11 3 0
4237A 9630 RIDOBBAVU CT SAIl DIEGO
1909 OBC-MARCONI ELBCTRONI 0 0 0 0 5 1 0
190'A 1370 SAIl MARCOS BL SAIl MARC.OS
6970 GBNBRAL CONSTRUCTION 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
87081A PORTABLE SAIl DIEGO
155 OBNERAL DYNAMICS 0 0 0 3 4 2 1
155A 42'7 PACIFIC BWY PLA SAIl DIBGO
3050 OENERAL DYNAMICS / EL 0 0 0 0 . 1 0
3050A 5011 1tBAIUl'Y VILLA RD SU DIBGO
2166 GENERAL DYNAMICS CONV 0 0 1. 0 11 15 0
at 6 '" 10825 POMBRADO DRIVE SU DIEGO
6U7 OUERAL DYNAMICS DATA 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
U292A 5021 1tBAIUl'Y VILLA RD IU DlIGO
241 GENERAL DYNAMICS/CONV 4 4 0 U t8 51 52
15 '" 3302 PAC CST BWY AIR SAIl DIEGO
(LINE1_7POLL_ADDRBSSES) P.q. 5 )7~?r U-MAR-n
ID NOS. FACILITY TSP PM10 SOX NOX TOG ROG CO
------- ----------------------- ------ ----- ----- ------ ------ ------ -----
592 GENERAL DYNAMICS/CONV 1 1 0 , 52 2 1
SOU 5001 ltEAIUfY VILLA R SAN DIEGO
U25 GENERAL DYNAMICS/ELEC 0 0 0 0 3 0 0
15097A 16250 TBCHNOLOGY DR SAN DIEGO
7278 GOLDJ'OIL KJ'G 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
88192A 325 STATB PLACB BSCONDIDO
5981 GllANDWOOD INC 0 0 0 0 4 3 0
5981A 1305 AJUlOIlLITI DR SAN MARCOS
171 GaOSSKONT BOSPITAL 0 0 0 21 5 1 23
171A 5555 GROSSKONT CTR D LA MESA
5214 BARBORLITI CORP 5 3 0 4 0 0 1
17tA 1450 SIMPSON WY !l8CONDIDO
30U HAWTBOlUfl INGINI BYS 0 0 0 2 0 0 1
30UA 8050 OTBILLO ST SAN DIIGO
6181 HAWTBOlUfl MACBINIRY 0 0 0 5 U 6 12
6181A 5730 MARIAN WY-ALCAL SAN DIIGO
52n HAZARD al CONTRACTING 10 8 0 2 3 2 3
U2A 10050 BLAClt KTN aD SAN DIEGO
4819 BEBDON ILICTRONICS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
4819A US OPPU ST. ISCONDIDO
5522 BOBII CAT COKPANY 0 0 0 0 12 12 0
5522A 4925 OCIANSIDI BL I OCIANSIDI
SUO BOKl FED SAVINGS I LO 0 0 0 23 4 0 20
5UOA 555 KOREBOUSI DR SAIl DIEGO
194 BOTEL DEL CORONADO 1 1 0 U 3 1 7
U4A 1500 ORANGI AVI CORONADO
6138 BUES KETAL FINISBING 0 0 0 0 11 , 0
'U8A 977 LINDA VISTA DR SAIl MARCOS
1488 BUGBES KlcaOILICTRONI 0 0 0 5 11 , 1
1488A 6155 IL CAMINO RIAL CARLS BAD
2980 BUMPDIY IIIC 0 0 0 0 10 0 0
2980A taU BALBOA AV SAIl DIIGO
"n BUNTER INDUSTRIIS 0 0 0 1 10 3 5
87080A 1940 DIAMOND ST SAIl MARCOS
6773 BYDRAllAUTICS 0 0 0 0 7 7 0
I6U4A 8330 KIlLlU.AIfI DR SAIl DIEGO
(LINB1_7POLL_ADDRBSSIS) Pa9- 6 U-MAR-n
/1-//
ID NOS. FACILITY TSP PH10 SOl NOI TOG lOG CO
-.'----- ----------------------- ------ ----- ----- ------ ------ ------ -----
n INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT 11 it 0 5 7 . ,
5961A 8150 PRIARS RD SAN DIEGO
3'" INDUSTRIAL ASPHALT IN . 7 0 3 , 3 5
36"1. 1301 SYCAMORI AV VISTA
7320 INTERNATIONAL IRON PR 0 0 0 0 1 2 0
110311. 10883 TBORNXINT SAN DIEGO
5251 IVAC CORP 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
52 581. 10300 CAMPOS POINT D SAN DIIGO
ISO JOOR Ml'G. INC. 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
8501. 1111 INDUSTRIAL AVB BSCONDIDO
6155 It , It LABS INC 0 0 0 0 16 16 0
61551. 3305 TYLER ST CARLS BAD
417 It T AEROPAB 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
4111. 203 N JOHNSON AV BL CAJON
2681 KAISER FOUNDATION BOS 1 1 0 , 11 5 it
26811. .,., lION AVBNOB SAN DIIGO
U01 KAYLIU INC 0 0 0 0 3 3 0
)11. 8520 RAILROAD AV SANTU
111 ItBLCO-DIV HIRCIt , CO 20 20 1 151 211' 2141 67
2031. 2145 BILT ST . SAN DIEGO
611 ItBTEMA I A , B DIV 0 0 0 0 8 2 0
'311. 110 GREENFIELD DR. BL CAJON
'US KILLION INDUSTRIBS 0 0 0 0 11 2 0
853001. 2111 LA XlRADA DR VISTA
UU BIGHT , CARVER IIIC 0 0 0 0 4 . 0
UUA 3150 JlANCOCIt ST SAN DIIGO
2611 ItYOCIRA AMnICA INC 0 0 0 0 21 22 0
26111. 8Ul BALBOA AV SAN DIEGO
5124 LANDFILL GUIRATING P 0 0 2 40 0 0 0
59UB SAN MARCOS LANDPILL SAN MARCOS
6251 LANDFILL GUERATING P 0 0 0 25 1 1 1
6251B SYCAMORB LANDFILL SAN DIIGO
614 LANGLIY CORPORATION 0 0 0 0 1 2 0
6141. 310 IOCLID AV SAN DIEGO
.._12 LUND , FLYNN IHC 3 2 0 0 1 1 1
23721. 370 TROUSDALB DR CHULA VISTA
(LINll_'POLL_ADDRESSIS) Pa98 1 ) 'J~cYtJ U-MAR-tS
ID NOS. rACILITY TIP PM10 SOX NOX TOG ROO CO
------- ----------------------- ------ ----- ----- ------ ------ ------ -----
U53 MAACO AUTO PAINTING 0 0 0 0 I I 0
U53A 5670 KBAaNY VILLA RD SAN DUGO
7561 KACCO CONSTRUCTION IN 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
192aGA PORTULI SAN DIIGO COUNTY
1715 MAlfSON CONST , INGIlfI 3 3 1 41 7 1 6
151498 OCIAlfSIDI BARBOR OCIAlfSIDI
7051 MAlfSON CONSTRUCTION , 0 0 0 4 0 0 1
17170A PORTULI SU DUGO
5UO MARTIN WOODWORKING 0 0 0 0 76 5 0
5UOA 1903 rRIBlfDSHIP DRIV IL CAJON
6706 MAXWILL LABORATORIIS 0 0 0 0 10 1 0
IIOUA 49.9 GRIINCRAIG LX SAN DIEGO
6609 HC DONNELL DOUGLAS TI 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
152au 16761 VIA DIL CAMPO SU DIEGO
1305 HCny DG INC 0 0 0 0 12 I 0
913UA 1215 30TH 8T 8U DIIGO
U3 ORCY HOSPITAL , KID 1 1 0 11 2 0 12
UU 4077 rIrn AVI SU DUGO
6671 HICRO UTILITY PARTlfIR 0 0 0 2 4 1 3
86037A 11.0 HISS ION RD. W SAN MARCOS
1720 HITCHILL 8USINISS rOR 0 0 0 0 11 11 0
USIA 11620 80RRINTO VALLI SU DUGO
2133 HOBIL OIL CORP 0 0 0 0 14 14 0
U33A 9950 8U DIIGO HISSI SU DUGO
7121 HOTIVATIOlfAL SYSTIK8 0 0 0 0 I I 0
1I031A IU URn 8T W IlAnOlfAL CITY
703 IlAPP 8YST1K8 (USA) Ilf 0 0 0 5 51 51 1
703A 360 8 PACIrIC ST 8AN MARCOS
19 IlATIOlfAL 8TIIL , SHIP 10 9 1 31 92 92 I
253A 28TH 8T , BARBOR DR SU DIIGO
2498 IlATIOlfL DIRleT ADVlRT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
249IA 9395 CABOT DR SU DIlGO
1927 Ilea 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
1927A 16550 W BIRKARDO DR. 8AN DUGO
"5867 OLIO. , lLOU 193 II 0 0 0 0 0
UsaA OTAY auCII Rn (SIRCII CJIOU nSTA
(LINI1 7POLL ADDRI8SIS) Pag. . 23-MAR-95
- - /1-3/
ID NOS. nCILITY TSP PIll0 SO:l NO:l TOG ROO CO
-----~- ----------------------- ------ ----- ----- ------ ------ ------ -----
5 DUO. , lLOU . 40 U 0 0 0 0 0
"USA 79 , MAl. UI OTAY
II NILSON , SLOU 32 11 0 0 0 0 0
39510 VIGILANTI RD , HY 67 LAltEIIDI
558 NIYENESCH PRINTERS IN 0 0 0 0 4 4 0
55810 2750 KITTNER BLVD SAN DIEGO
5535 NORTHERN TILICOIl SCG 0 0 0 1 4 4 0
553510 16350 BERNARDO DR SAN DIEGO
1473 OLBAUSIN BILLIARDS 0 0 0 0 11 11 0
8UIIA 12460 lIRKHAM CT POWAY
5127 ONI DAY PAINT , BODY 0 0 0 0 11 11 0
512710 4676 CARDIN IT IAN OliGO
140 ONI DAY PAINT , BODY 0 0 0 0 10 10 0
14010 1141 NATIONAL CITY NATIONAL CITY
"14 ONSITI ENERGY/PARI AT 0 0 0 8 20 4 9
1708510 2000 2ND CORONADO
.
5838 PACIFIC BILL 2 2 0 59 5 1 31
810 7337 TRADI ST SAN OliGO
6011 PACIPIC ENERGY 2 2 3 U 148 2 U
606810 OTAY LANDPILL SAN DIEGO
7067 PACIPIC SHIP REPAIR , 0 0 0 0 6 6 0
17 17810 1125 RIGIL IT. IAN DIEGO
251 PACIPIC 10UTHWEST AIR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
10UA 7007 CONSOLIDATED WY SAN OliGO
7038 PACUIC 'I'AJIBOUJl 0 0 0 0 U 21 0 \
87141& 1510 MAl. IT CB1JLA VIITA
421 l'ALOMAR MEMORIAL B081' 1 1 0 27 U . 18
42810 555 VALLIY PY I ISCONDIDO
204 l'ARlHOUSI T~RI INC. 0 0 0 0 3 3 0
20U 4660 RUPFlfn ST. SAN DlIGO
8351 .llflfYSAVn / SUTTON I 0 0 0 0 2 2 0
9UllA 1300 SPECIALTY DR VISTA
277 l'IONEIR MILLS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
27710 1329 MISSION RD. . SAN MARCO'
3~.3 l'OMIRADO BOSPITAL 0 0 0 5 . 1 2
362310 15615 .OKIRADO ROAD 'OWAY
(LINEl 7.0LL ADDRESSES) ..q. 9 /9~Y;:L U-IlAR-U
- -
10 NOS. FACILITY TSP PK10 SOX NOX TOG ROG CO
------- ----------------------- ------ ----- ----- ------ ------ ------ -----
211 POWERINE OIL CO 0 0
211A 9950 SAN OlIGO MISS SAN OlIGO
47 PRI MIXED CONCRETI CO 0 0
509A 9300 FRIARS ID SAN OlIGO
4387 PRO-LINI PAINT CO 6 0
4387A 264' MAIN ST. SAN OlIGO
6758 QOALITY CABINIT , FIX 0 0
86119A 885 GATIWAY CENTER W 8AN OlIGO
290 RCP CO INC 30 13
290A 9631 MAGNOLIA A'll. N SANTII
45' ROD INC
300A BROWN FIILO
1 1
SAN DIEGO
~ t. ROD INDO.TaIIS
30 U I'OOT 01' . ''1
o 0
CB11LA VISTA
7800 S 0 CITY / WASTI WATI 1 1
90228A I'IISTA ISLAND (PORTA SAN OlIGO
3319 8 D CNTY GIN SVCS
3319A 325 MILROSI DR S
o
VISTA
o
7464 8 D REHABILITATION IN 0 0
89176A 6645 ALVARADO aD SAN DllGO
.1 8. PACIFIC PIPI LINlS 0 0
1069A 9950 SAN OlIGO KISSI SAN DllGO
309 SALK INSTITOTI 1 1
309A 10010 N.TORRIY PINES LA JOLLA
6102 8AN DIEGO COUNTY OIN 0 0
1102A 250 MAIN ST. lAST IL CAJON
5718 8AN OlIGO DISION II 0 0
5718A .311 ABL~~ WY SANTII
414. 8AN DIIGO UNIFIED POR 33 16
4149A 10TH AVI KARINI TIRM SAN DllGO
1712 8ANYO I , I CORP
81071A 1201 SANYO AV
o 0
SAIl DIEGO
23.5 8CRIPPS CLINIC/RISIAR 1 1
2395A 10111 TORRIY PINlS . LA JOLLA
354 8CRIPPS MIKORIAL BOSP 1 1
354A .888 GENlSII AVIHOI .AII DIIGO
(LINll 7POLL ADDRISSIS)
- -
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
I
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
paq. 10 /
f~t?J
o
o
o
o
o
11
1
8
o
4
o
4
o
o
o
o
10
u
20
o
17
10
o
313
1
o
o
31
10
o
.
o
11
1
73
20
o
12
10
o
o
o
57
1
o
o
31
15
o
.
o
11
1
18
23-MAR-95
o
o
o
o
o
1
o
2
o
1
o
13
o
o
o
o
2
70
10 MOS. J'ACILITY TSP PIU 0 SOl MOl TOO ROO CO
------- ----------------------- ------ ----. ----- ------ ------ ------ -----
U SO CENTRAL COOLIMG CO 0 0 0 , 21 7 20
1518110 'U II ST W SAM DIEGO
3UO 80 CITY WSTII WATER TR 2 2 55 22 108 7 138
3UOA 1102 GATCH ILL ROAD SAM OliGO
7283 SO CITY/MORTH XIRAKAR 0 0 0 0 130" 155 0
8UIU CONVOY , BY 52 SAM OliGO
7282 SO CITY/SOUTH XIRAKAR 0 0 0 0 un 31 0
8U"A 5150 CONVOY , HY 52 SAM OliGO
7284 80 CITY/WBST XIRAKAR 0 0 0 5 2111' 241 2
IIU'C 5180 CONVOY 8'1' 8AM DIEGO
7U3 SO CNTY/OTAY LANDJ'ILL 0 0 0 3 SUO U 1
8817110 OTAY XESA RD SAM DIIlGO
8717 SO CNTY/SAM XAllCOS LA 0 0 0 , 184" 2U 1
5U4C SAM XAllCOS LANDJ'ILL SAM XAllCOS
8711 80 CNTY/SYCAXORI LAND 0 0 0 3 5131 73 1
U57C 8YCAXORI LANDJ'ILL SAM D1:IIGO
11.013 80 MARRIOTT .OTBL 1 1 0 21 55 11 24
l3A 333 W. HARBOR DR SAM OliGO
351 80 8'1'10'1'1 VMIVIRSITY 1 1 0 18 4 1 I
35110 5300 CAXPAMILII DR. 8Al1 DIIlGO
70U 800'1 CO/11TH AVB 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
8801410 222 11TH AVI SAlI OliGO
5U 800'11 CO/DIVISION GT 0 0 1 0 0 0 0
SUA HARBOR , VISTA SAM OliGO
5U 800n CO/BL CAJOM GT 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
SUA 800 MAIN 8'1'. W IL CAJON
20U 800n CO/ILICT MAINT 0 0 0 0 3 0 0
20UA 5488 OVERLAND AVII 8Al1 OliGO
73 800n CO/INCIRA 'LANT 55 41 212 1375 23 19 482
33310 UOO CAJU,8IAD IL CAJU,8BAD
2232 800'1 CO/J'LIIT MAINTB 0 0 0 0 2 2 0
223210 45 ITH AV / I'LIIT MA SAM DIEGO
3U 800n CO/I'OIL 'OMP 8'1' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
3UA 2'00 TERMINAL 8'1' RATIONAL CITY
.J8 800n CO/GAS KITER 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
33810 It 11TH AV / GA8 8Al1 OliGO
(LINE1_7'OLL_ADDRE8SE8) .aq. 11 / '1 ~ Yf U-XAll-U
ID NOS. rACILITY TSP PIUO SOl NOI '1'00 ROO CO
------- ----------------------- ------ ----- ----- ------ ------ ------ -----
71 soou CO/It!AlUlY KlSA 1 1 1 8 3 0 7
SUA 5460 OnRLAND AVENUI SAN DIEGO
540 soou CO/KIRAXAR GT 1 1 0 5 2 0 5
54 01. un CONSOLIDATBD WA SAN DIEGO
5211 8DOU CO/MISSION SWIT 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
52 1110 90'0 FRIARS JlI) SAN DIEGO
4157 8DO'1 CO/KAV STA GT 0 0 0 3 1 0 2
415710 VISTA ST , WARD JlI) SAN DllGO
101 8DOU CO/NCT GT 0 0 0 1 0 0 1
SUA rOOT or NEVILLI RD SAN DIEGO
541 8DO'1 CO/NORIS GT 0 0 2 2 1 0 2
54110 NAS NORIS GT - BLOO SAN DIEGO
.. 72 800'1 CO/80VTB BAY 'L 39 38 U UO' 21 17 480
SUA "0 BY BL CBOU VISTA
75 8DO'1 CO/STATION B 'L 0 0 0 4 0 0 2
UtA 714 I STRIIT W SAN DIBGO
937 81A WORLD INC 1 1 0 30 U 19 33
93710 1720 SOUTH SBORES Il SAN DIIGO
41358 8HARP CAllRILLO BOS'IT 0 0 0 1 1 0 0
U58A 3475 KENYON 8'1' SAN DIEGO
10" 8BELL 0 0 0 0 u u 0
10"B 9150 8AN DllGO KISSI SAN DllGO
1757 8BUTTER MART or CALIF 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
175710 IOU MORBlfA BL SU DllGO
172 8IGNIT ARXORLITI INC. 0 0 0 0 201 43 0
&l4A 1001 ARXORLITI DR SAN IlARCOS
77 81M J BARIlIS co 85 45 0 , , 3 4
18010 UU BARIlIS .LA1fT Il SAN DIIGO
n 81M J BARIlIS co It 52 0 2 4 2 3
371" 3701 SA YMAR JlI) CARIoSBAD
1715 80LAR TURBIHlS INC 5 5 1 U 31 20 12
18nA 4200 llUFFIN llD SU DIIGO
U7 80LAR '1'URBIHlS INC 5 5 0 50 " 9 U
3UA 2200 'ACUIC BY SU DIEGO
2183 80NY COil. or MIIlICA 0 0 0 0 U U 0
218310 1'450 BIRKAIlDO DR W SM DIEGO
(LINll_7'OLL_ADDllE8SI8) '&9- .12 1'}-8'5 U-IlAR-U
.
10 NOS. FACILITY TSP PN10 801 NOI TOG ROG CO
--,.---- ----------------------- ------ ----- ----- ------ ------ ------ -----
n SONY KFG CO 01' AMERIC 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
U20SA 16550 VIA ISPRILLO SAN OIEGO
369 80RRENTO READY NIl 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
369A 3505 CARMEL VY RD DEL KAR
7270 800TH COAST MATERIALS 126 61 0 12 4 3 5
88183A 720 TWIll OUS VALLIY SAN KARCOS
1969 SOOTHERK CALIFORNIA I 1 1 0 23 16 4 6
1969A KY 101/IIUCLBAR GIN S SAN OIBGO
2669 SOOTHERN CALIFORNIA P 0 0 0 0 19 7 0
2U9A 3261 NATIONAL AVI. SAN DIEGO
478 SOOTHWEST KARINE INC 80 69 2 14 48 48 3
3UA FOOT OF SAMPSON ST SAN DIEGO
7095 SPA CENTERS INC. 0 0 0 0 34 7 0
88002A 3093 INDOSTRY ST. OCEANSIDI
2317 SPECIALIZED PROCISSIII 0 0 0 0 3 1 0
2317A 581 MARSHALL AVB S IL CAJON
"'\7 SPRAY ART FIIIISHERS 0 0 0 0 6 3 0
a J3A 1455 SIMPSON WAY ISCONDIDO
7373 STAITI RI IIIGINEIRING 0 0 0 1 0 0 0
89085A 505 WEST HARBOR ORIV SAN DIBGO
6019 STROCTRON CORPORATION 0 0 0 0 1 1 0
60UA 1180 DIAKOND ST SAN KARCOS
5161 SONDSTRAND TORBOMACH 1 1 1 5 2 2 1
516lA 4400 ROFnll RD SAN OlIGO
7851 SOPERIOR READY NIX U 14 0 8 1 1 2
10286A KIRAMAR LANDFILL WIS SAN OIBGO
4851 80PIRIOR READY NIX CO 17 1 0 0 0 0 0
4851A 12414 KY n LAltI8IDI
6104 80PIRIOR READY KIX CO 2 1 0 0 0 0 0
nOtA 1245 CAKINO SANTA FI ISCONDIDO
128 SUPERIOR READY NIX CO 3 2 0 0 0 0 0
USA 1508 KISSION Ill) ISCONDIDO
2821 8UPERIOR READY KIX co 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
'.~lA 7500 KISS ION GORGI R 8AN DllGO
1714 If K I 0 0 0 0 1 0 0
86155A 4071 CALLI PLATINO OCEANS 101
(LINI1_7POLL_ADDRESSI8) 1'ag_ 13 cY? 23-MAR-95
)~-
ID NOS. I'ACILITY TSP PK10 SOX NO% TOO ROO CO
------- ----------------------- ------ ----- ----- ------ ------ ------ ___e.
UU TAYLOR DYKBKA Kl'G CO 0 0 0 0 I I 0
UUA 2210 KETTNER BLVD SAlI DIEGO
7061 TAYLOR MADI GaLl' COMP 0 0 0 0 31 0 0
171791. 22 71 COSMOS CT. CARLS BAD
lU TELEDYIlI RYAll AERONAO 0 0 0 1 U 12 1
3881. 2701 BARBOR DR . SAlI DIEGO
552 TELIDYNI RYAll ILICTRO 0 0 0 0 3 1 0
5521. IUO 8AL80A AV SAlI DIIGO
2010 TIXACO RII' , MARKETIN 0 0 0 0 12 12 0
20101. 1166 SAlI DIIGO MISSI SAlI DllGO
161 TITLIIST GaLl' CLOB P 0 0 0 0 6 6 0
1611. 1021 MISSION AV W BSCONDIDO
7505 TONY' S TRACTOR WOUS 12 . 0 0 0 0 0
172021. 15621 LAS LOKAS ROAD BL CAJON
5601 TOPPAlI WIBT IlfC 0 0 0 0 57 3. 0
56081. 7770 MIRAMAR RD. SAlIDIEGO
1517 TRUST PRINTID CIRCUIT 0 0 0 0 U 11 0
121551. 1333 _IYSTOMB WAY VIBTA
6011 TRW IlfC. 0 0 0 0 36 I 11
60561. 15120 IlflfOVATIOIf DR SAlI DIEGO
5816 TTI BAlfDAG 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
58161. 22 01 KAI. ST. SAlI DIEGO
517 OCSD/CAMPOS 5 5 0 U 3 1 13
4021. GILMAN DRIVI SAIl DIEGO
1171 UNIO. TRIBUNI PUBLISB 0 0 0 1 35 34 5
11711. 350 CAKIIfO DI LA RII SAIl DllGO
5423 UNI8YS 0 0 0 1 7 2 0
54231. 10150 VIA FRONTERA SAIl DIEGO
5211 UNISYS (R82) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
451. U701 W BIlUfAJtDO DR SAIl DIEGO
404 UNIV BOSPITAL/SCB 01' 0 0 0 6 5 1 1
4041. 200 W. ARBOR DR. SAIl DIEGO
. 7011 UNIVIRSITY COOIlflRATI 4 4 0 35 11 1 2
UOUA I'COT 01' B ST. CBULA VISTA
71n UPPIR DICK CO. 0 0 0 0 71 I 0
1021lA 1t01 SIA OTTO PL CARLS BAD
(Lllfll_7POLL_ADDRESSIS) pag. U 17-?? U-MAR-95
.
ID NOS.
FACILITY
TSP PK10
------- --------------~-------- ------ ----- ----- ------ ------ ------ -----
CO
.70 OS AIR LINES INC.
. 2701. 3225 BARBOR DR .
o 0
SAN DIEGO
'477 OS ARMY CORPS or INGI 0 0
851491. OCEANSIDI HARBOR/POR OCEAN8IDB
2749 OS FOAM COKPANY 0 0
27491. '350 YARRO. DR. SOIT CARLS BAD
221 OSMC BASI:
48281. CAMP PENDLI:TON
SOX
o
2
o
7 7 3
CAMP PENDLETON
245 OSMC RECRUIT DIPOT 0 0
48301. BARNETT AV . PACIFIC SAN DIIGO
4824 USN AIR STATION-KIRAM 10 10
48241. .AS MIRAMAR SAN DIEGO
o
3
94 OS. AIR STATION-NORIS 3 3 1
48211. NAS NORTH ISLAND GR SAN DIEGO
4833 OSN AMPHIBIOUS BASI .1. 1
48331. SILVER STRAND BL CORONADO
15 OS. HOSPITAL 3 3
J5A NAVY HOSPITAL SAN DllGO
3'2 OSN HOSPITAL I PEND 0 0
3'21. NAVAL HOSPITAL CAMP PI:NDLITON
U45 OSN .AV STA 1 1
48451. 32ND ST. , HARBOR DR SAIl DIEGO
2'43 OSN SUBNARI" BASI:
2'431. SAN ONOFRI: ARD-30
o 0
SAN DllGO
223 OS. TRAINING STATION 0 0
483'1. LYTTON ST 'BARNETT SAN DII:GO
2059 VAIl CAlI COKPANY 0 0
21931. '045 CARROLL WY SAN DII:GO
8124 VI8IOII SYSTIMS INC. 0 0
911791. 1870 GILLI:SPII: WAY I:L CAJON
7579 WALKER WOOD PRODUCTS 0 0
892891. 1355 DESCAJlSO AVI: SAIl MARCOS
7330 WATKINS KANOPACTORING 0 0
8-'421. 1280 PARlt CBllTU DR. VISTA
414' WATKI.S KANOPACTORING 0 0
414'1. '225 I:L CAMIllO RBAL CARLSBAD
(LINE1_7POLL_ADDRESSI:8)
Pac;. 15
/ ~ ~ g-y
o
o
o
3
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
NOX
"
95
"
Z9
10
45
TOG
o
o
20
31
o
17
U8
10
o
.
53
5
13
o
o
19
o
U
o
o
93
o
ROG
5
3
20
30
1
12
120
5
2
52
11
7
19
12
2
14
3
U-NAR-95
5
o
2
7
o
21
1
o
31
18
5
2
2
30
o
o
2
1
7
o
o
o
2
o
o
1
o
ID NOS. FACILITY TSP PX10 SOl NOI TOG ROG CO
..
------- ----------------------- ------ ----- ----- ------ ------ ------ -----
554 WEBER BAKING CO.
554A 1955 JULIAN AV
5692 WELLS FARGO BANK
5692A 401 24TH ST W
o 0
SAN DIEGO
o 0
NATIONAL CITY
5693 WEST COAST COATING CO 1 1
5693A 3210 COKMBRICAL STRI SAN DIlGO
8520 WEST COAST FURNITURI 0 0
92078A 9356 WBEATLANDS RD # SANTEI
4390 WESTERN LIFT INC
4390A 2200 BArFLY AV.
o 0
NATIONAL CITY
5483 WESTERN MARBLI KANFG 0 0
5483A 811 RANCHEROS DR SAN MARCOS
2531 WINDOWMASTIR PRODUCTS 0 0
2531A 1111 PIONEER WY. IL CAJON
1157 WINNERS ONLY 0 0
91212A 4039 CALLI PLATINO OCEANSIDI
U5 WYROC
'15A 1385 SYCAMORI AV
7082 BARCON CORP.
3068A PORTABLI
34
VISTA
18
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o 0 0
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
o
2
o
36
o
58
1
5
5
29
5
o
o
--------------------------------------------------
Total TSP ..
Total PM10 ..
Total SOX ..
Total NOX =
Total TOG =
Total ROG ..
Total CO =
Facility count .. 271
(LINE1_7POLL_ADDRESSIS)
1,97'
1,137
370
4,810
73,495
5,005
2,277
ton.
ton.
ton.
ton.
tOil.
tons
tOil.
paq. 16
) ~ - B-;
36
o
u
o
2
5
8
3
o
o
U-MAR-95
o
o
o
o
o
o
4
o
o
o
!
~" ,,_ iii
~"21~ H I
. ..
... ..
.. ..
I
I'~ ..
Ii =
~HI~~
..;~:;'r
. .
~ ..
-:r
~
---.,.
J~
--
. ....
--
.:::::s
~
!;
il
II
~
J
'")
:(:
~
..
0,
! ~
..
.. !
~ i
.... ~
!i ~ ~
..... ~ ..
.I~ ~ . =~
); t1 5~
... ~ ,
-: e ~ llll
~~ 3 ::. ~R
>>fj 004 ~ 1ft 2i
!~," ~ i: · ~ ~i
i~ i HhlS
~,~ .;! I; ~1~81
~i . 1 ~ t. =..; II
BJI!k :'.=.
~H~~ ,..: ~6
............ ~ I
.. !'.l\ : ea
i~ ~~: ; ~";EAI
":~!i ! .. C !~~..
,..... ... ~wl
~. I ...... I::sO
.::U'i" i l la..;:
~~-=";I ~-g.:~.:'1..4'"
... .. -.-.-.-
s
s
..
..
..
..
.
.....
~,iJ
..,
..
..
..
...
....
"..
..0
-"
M
B
i i
1= I:: 8::
.. ~.. ~..
g 109 109
13 g g
..
..
..
"
..
..
..
..
,
..
g8
..,
.
o
..
..
..
o
"
o
..
..
..
..
..
.
o
"
..
..
iii
;1
i~
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
.
..
!,
.
o
..
..
..
o
"
o
..
..
..
..
..
..
o
"
..
..
iii
I~
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
.
..
!~
.
o
..
..
..
o
"
o
..
.
..
..
..
.
o
"
-
~
h
..
~..
0"
o
:lg
10
..
..
iii
;1
i~
..
..
.
..
..
..
..
,
..
!,
.
o
..
..
..
o
"
o
..
.
..
..
..
..
o
"
~ i i
8= h h
.. .. ..
~.. ~.. ~..
0'" 0_ 0_
Ii Ii Ii
..
..
iii
..:;;
..-
i~
..
..
..
..
..
..
.
..
!,
.
o
..
..
..
o
"
o
..
..
..
..
..
..
o
"
..
o
sa
rrr
.. .. .. I I I I I
1= 1= 1= 1= 1= 1= 1= 1=
~. a-~. '" '" '" '" '"
;~ ;...;... ... ... ... ... ...
gl gl gl :1 :1 :1 :1 :1
B BE. . . . .
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
iii
..;
..-
i~
..
..
=
:
=
=
r::;; Ii
0-
Hi
..
..
..
"
g g~
1 I::
..
..
..
..
"
..
..
..
..
,
~,
.
..
..
=
,
5~
...
..
..
..
..
..
..
.
...
=,iJ
.. ,
..
..
..
..
..
..
.
...
=,iJ
...
..
..
..
..
..
..
,
::ll'
...
"'
"
"
o
..
..
..
o
..
o
..
.
..
..
..
.
o
..
..
o
S~
.
o
..
..
o
"
..
o
S~
AI AI AI AI AI AI AI AI AI AI AI AI
'" ~ M ~ ~ ~ ~ " ft " ... ...
il ~I ~I ~I ~I ~I ~I 51 51 51 ~I ~I
/9-; tl
:
lia
i:
..
..
..
..
..
..
,
::ll'
...
"'
"
"
.
o
..
..
o
"
:
liE
i~
..
..
..
..
..
..
.
51
"'
"
..
.
o
..
..
o
"
AS
..~
~I
..
-
Ii;:;
.:::
..'"
i;;:
..
..
..
..
..
..
.
::ll'
...
" ,
"
"
..
o
.
..
o
"
AS ..e ..e
~ !: !:
51 5i =~
... ... ~E!
. . Or:;
..
..
Ii..
i~
..
..
=
..
iii.;
....
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
,
!!
"'
"
..
..
..
..
..
,
:!:~
....
..,
..
..
..
o
..
...
o
"
o
..
..
..
o
"
.
..
..
..
..
~..
"0
.0
ig
'.
~.. H H H S S S
Ell H H H H H H H H H H H H H H H
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
f
~
II E
:! ..
5 ..
.
g : .. " :;; i
. . I; ..
h U t ..- t ..- j i~ I~ .. I .. h
1;;:; 1;" I; H t U ~ Ii t
i~,i~ .
= i! I; ..
II ~- I! i~
s ...~ "'e "e -'"!. ........ .. =~
.. .. .i .. .. 0 ..
.. .. .. .. .. 0 0 0 .. 0 .. .. 0 .. .. .. .. ~ .. .. ..
.. ~ .. .. .. .. .. .. ~ .. .. ~ .. .. .. .. ~ .. .. .. ~ ..
... ... ... ... ... ... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ... ... ...
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
I , I I , , , , I I , I , I I , , , , I I I
.. .. .. 0" 0.. 0.. si si ~i ~i 51 d d d , .. .. .. .. d :::! v
8 oil oil ::;: :l:1l =:11 U :Jt U U :&
I '" '" '" '" "' '" .., '" .., .., ., ., ., ~I ~I ~I ~l ~l ~l ~I
" .. .. " " .. ~ ~ .. .. .. .. .. " .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
" " " " " " " " ... ... ... .. .. .. .. ..
.. .. .. ~ ~ 0 Is IE . . 0 .. .. ~ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
.. .. .. 0 0 " .... .... ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. .. ..
~ .. .. ~ ~ .. .... .... !:; .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ~ ~ ~
.. .. .. .. .. 0 .... ".. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
0 0 0 0 0 0 I~ 0 "0 ..0 I~ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
.. .. .. .. .. .. r ... ... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
M M
M E E R R R M
I I
B R R M !l !l i i Ii 8 I I
Ii Eo Eo IE !.. I I I I I
I... 1= 1= I~ I~ II.. II.. Ii: I;: Hi: Ba B;! B;! B;! B;! 8;:
i~ I~ I~ I; I; ..
ii ... Ii Ii 1= .. .. Ii .. .. .. ..
.. .... II II: II II II II II II II
0 i! 0 .g Hg I! I!
II: .0 Clo gi gi Ii
0 0
&0 .0 .0 1iI0
.. . . . OJ .. .. . . . . . . .
oeE
o~
ii
oel oel
... ...
il il
oeE
..~
EI
oeE
..~
EI
oel
..
sl
oeE
.~
al
oel oel
. ..
al il
oeE
..~
il
cl cl
~I II
cE
..~
il
cE
.~
al
!;;
=:;
"s
c
cl cl oel oel
II II II II
oeE
o~
~I
oeE
o~
~i
oeE
~
Ii
J~~9/
.. .. .. .. .. s s s s s s s .. s .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 00
II
.. .. .. .. .. i I; I;
!l II::; II
!l !l !l !l t~ .. II II II II I; I;
i~ i~ -
~ g g 00- 00 .. 00- fl .... L ~
il~ il- o~ e = h := :=
;i"! ;i"! :iii ;i! I; I;"! Ii~ I;! I~ ~ .... i~
.. ..0 ..0 ..- .... 11= 0 .. a h II II
II II" II" II" 110 .. .... ..~ "0 .. Ooe ..
.. .. 0 0 .. .. 0 .. 0
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ~ ... .. .. .. .. ~ .. 0 .. ..
.. ~ ~ .. .. .. ~ .. .. ~ .. .. .. .. .. ~ .. .. .. .. .. ..
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ...
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
, . , . , , . , . ~ . , , , , , , , . , . .
..k "k ..k "k ..k >- d d ::!t ::!t >- t ~ g~ g~ g~ g~ :!l~ ~~ ~~ ..
~.t U U U U H ::!! ::!! :::&
.., ... .., .., .., ~, .., .. , .., ... .., ... , .. , ... ... .. , ~. .., .., ..,
0 0 0 0 0 ... .. .. 0 0 0 0 ::I ... .. .. .. .. ... ... ... ..
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . . . . ... ~ ... ... ... ... ~ .. .. ..
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. . . .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
.. .. .. ... !:i . . . . . . . .. .. . . . . . . . ..
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
0 0 0 0
.. .. .. ..
~ ~ ~ ~
.. .. .. ..
! B t B .. .. .. ..
.. .. .. ..
B t t I. ~ ~ ~ ~
0 0 0 0 I ..
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. t i
.. .. .. .. .. t
.. .. .. .. .. . . 1= i
. . . . . ~ ..
80 8 80 8 8 If hi Is
Il;: Il= 0 0 0 0 0 8= 8= h ..
Il;: Il;: s= .. .. .. .. .. ..
.. .... ... . . . . . . ;:1 ..
0" 0" 0" 0:1 Il" .... .... .. .. .. :I .. .. .... s: Il" Il" .. .. ..
.. ::I. II. II. II. II.. S:: S:: .. II II ~g
;1 ;1 ;1 ;1 ~I 0" .... O. O. il ..
0 .0 .0 0 0 0 0 15 15 15 15
Ilg g3 g3 u u u u 13 13 0
go llo llo llo llo ... ... EO
..~ ..~ ..~ ..~ ..~ ..~ ..~ ..~ ..~ ..~ ..~ ..~ ..~ ..~ ..~ ..~ ..~ ..~ ..~ ..~
~i ~i ~i ~i ~i ~i ~i ~i Ii Ii Ii Ii ii Ii ii ii ii ii Ii Ii
..e
~
Ii
..~
...
51
J~-l;L
033'3 1\ Mn Illft 132. 3M I\V
CIIlIL& 9Uft OOOOt ltll 203117 21-I!ec-ltU Ut60.2
033.3 1\ Mn Illft 1321 3M I\V
CIIlIL& 9Uft OOOOt Itll 201U7 21-Dee-ltU Ut60.3
033'3 1\ Mn Illft 132. 3M I\V
CIIlIL& 9Uft OOOOt Itll 203117 21-I!ec-ltt3 61.lle) (5)
037tl 1\ UICO .. .. IIDII _ I1tU 720 8ft
CIIlIL& nftA OOOot ltl0 201621 25-Jaa-lt'l Ilt60.3 lIP"
01151 1\ ftUnT OIL CO 101 'l'8UGIllIPB CAII'tOJI Mlft" .107)
CIIOLA 'l%ftl\ 0000' ltl0 20162) 21-Jaa-lttl UtlO.2 n
03151 1\ ftUnT OIL CO 601 'l'8L11a1U1P8 CAII'tOJI M(ftA .107)
CIIOLA 9Uft OOOot Itl0 203123 21-Jaa-lttl UtlO.I n
03151 1\ ftUnT OIL CO 101 'I'8LIIaIUIP8 eAII'lOII 1IIl(""" .107)
CIIOLA 9Uft oooot ItlO 203123 26-Jaa-lttl 61.lle) (6) n
03.5. 1\ _n_ It. 3M AV
CIIOLA 9Uft OOOOt 1'10 201727 l'-Peb-lttl 21 n
03.5. 1\ _n_ Ita 3M I\V
CIIOLA 9Uft OOOOt 1'10 201727 lI-Peb-lttl UtlO.2 PI
03.5. 1\ _n GUOLID It. 3111l AV
CIIOLA 'l%ftl\ OOOOt ltl0 201727 lI-Peb-lttl 61.I(e)(5) n
0315. 1\ _n_ Itl 1M AV
'- CIIOLA 'l%ftl\ 0000' ltl0 201727 lI-Peb-lttl 61.I(e) (6) PI
'-.() 012.2 1\ -.. OIL CG-nel 20U55101 It, 3111l AV
I CIIOLA 9Uft oooot Itll 201726 lI-Peb-lttl 21
~ 01212 A -.. OIL co-ne' 201155101 It, 3111l AV
~ CIIOLA 9Uft OOOOt 1'11 201721 l'-Peb-lttl UtlO.2
01212 A nBLL OIL CG-1I:IC' 201155101 It, 3M I\V
CIIOLA 9Uft oooot ltll 201726 l'-Peb-lttl 61.6(el (5)
062ta A ~...___ va ~ '5 -.z'f" M
CIIOLA 9Uft OOOot 1'10 201736 23-Ilar-lttl 21 n
062ta A _...-.4 va ~ '5 -.z'l'A 1IIl
CIIOLA 'I%ft" OOOOt ltl0' 201731 23-Ilar-lttl UtlO.2 n
062ta 1\ ...........,. 08 %.: '5 ~M
CIIOLA 9Uft OOOOt ItlO 201731 23-llar-lttl 61.I(e) (5) PI
062ta A ............ OM ~ '5 -.zu 1IIl
CIIOLA 9Uft OOOOt ItlO 201736 23-llar-lt" "006/.) PI
03031 A CIIOLA 9Uft en or PUll 1IOIUtlI D1IIl 707 P""
CIIOLA 9Uft OOOOt 1'10 201736 21-Ilar-lttl 21 PI
0303' 1\ CIIOLA 9Uft en or PUll 1IOIUtlI D1IIl 707 Pft
CIIOLA 9Uft OOOOt ltl0 201736 21-Ilar-lttl UtlO.2 n
03031 A CIIOLA YIftA en or PUll 1IOIUtlI D1IIl 707 P""
CIIOLA 9Uft 0000' Itl0 201736 21-Ilar-lttl 61.lle)(5) n
03031 A CIIOLA nll'l'A en or PUll 1IIl1UtlI D1IIl 707 Pft
CIIOLA n..,." 0000' ltl0 201736 21-llar-lttl "0061.) n
,
.
1.0" .. WOCAL U.5 .....
CII1ILA 'f'UD 0000. 1910 2011" .-"""-1'" Utlo.' ....
190" .. WOCAL 1195 .....
CII1ILA YJft.. 0000. 1910 2011" .-"""-1'" 11.&Cel CI) ....
03712 .. UCO PUftICIII ft'A'n0ll1l me 1107 31.0 IIIWI 1ft
CII1ILA nft'A 0000. 1.11 201117 1-"""-199& 21 PI
0)712 .. UCO ...ftlCIII ft'A'n0ll1l me 1107 31.0 IIIWI 1ft
CII1ILA 'f'UD 0000. 1911 201117 1-"""-199& UtlO.2 PI
03712 .. UCO PUftICIII ft'A'n0ll1l me 1107 3190 IIIWI 1ft
CII1ILA YJft.. 0000. 1.11 201117 1-"""-199& 11.&(e)(5) PI
0)712 .. UCO PUftICIII ft'A'n0llll me 1107 3190 IIIWI 1ft
CII1ILA YJft.. 0000' 1911 201117 1-"""-199& ..006Cal PI
03731 .. _n ..... _ UII'l'AL .10 nmo8'1'llDL BL
CII1ILA YJft.. 0000. 1910 201161 1-"""-199& 21 WI
03731 .. _ ..... _ Ulft'AL .10 nmo8'1'llDL BL
CII1ILA YJft.. 0000. 1910 201161 1-"""-199& &1960.2 PI
03731 .. _ ..... _ UII'l'AL .10 nmo8'1'llDL BL
CII1ILA 'f'UD 0000. 1910 201161 1-"""-199& I1.Ue) (5) PI
03731 .. _ ..... BOCK Ulft'AL '10 1IIIllI8'1'IlDL BL
CII1ILA nft.. 0000. 1910 201161 1-"""-199& ..006 (a) PI
01212 .. 8BBLL OiL CO-W1C' 20&155&01 199 3RD ..V
'- CII1ILA 'f'UD 0000. 1911 201173 17-"""-199& 21
'-.\:l 01212 .. 8BBLL OIL CO-W1CI 20&155&01 199 )RD "V
\ CII1ILA 'f'UD 0000. 1.11 201173 17-"""-199& UtlO.2
'-tl 01212 .. 8BBLL OiL CO-W1CI 20U55&01 199 )RD "V
~ CII1ILA 'f'UD 0000' 1'11 201173 17-"""-199& 11.&Ce)C5)
01212 .. 8BBLL OiL CO-W1c1 20&155&01 199 )RD "V
CII1ILA 'f'UD 00009 1911 201173 17-"""-199& ..006Ca)
OU5& .. IIIUft\' OiL co 601 ftLII01IAPII CAImlII RDC"''' .1071
CII1ILA YJft" . 00009 1910 20117& 17-"""-199& 21 PI
OU5& .. IIIUft\' OIL co 601 ftLm1lAPll CAImlII RDC"''' .107)
CII1ILA YJft" 00009 1.10' 20117& 17-"""-199& UtlO.2 PI
OU5& .. IIIUft\' OiL co &01 ftLII01IAPII CAImlII RDII",. 1107)
CII1ILA 'f'UD 0000' 1910 20117& 17-"""-199& 11.&Ce)(5) PI
ousa .. IIIUft\' OiL co 601 _RAP. CAImlII RD (..." 1107)
CII1ILA 'I1ft'A 0000. 1910 20117& 17-"""-199& ..006Cal PI
0&211 .. .......__ OM :z:.: 15 ~"RD
CII1ILA 'f'UD 00009 1.10 201175 21-"""-199& 21 PI
0&211 .. ..._,,~ OM %.: .5 ~""RD
CII1ILA 'I1ft'A 00009 1910 201175 21-"""-199& UtlO.2 WI
0&211 .. _...~Ol!lA~ .5 BOIII'l''' ItD
ClULA 'f'UD 0000. 1910 201175 21-"""-199& 11.&Ce)C5) PI
0&211 .. CIIIIVIlOII 01.. me .5 BOllI.,," an
CBOLA Vlft'A 00009 1910 201175 21-"""-199& 9&006(a) PI
"
::
Ii
u
..
...
...
..
=
I
=~
01'
..
...
.
01
...
..
o
..
Ko
a=
II
.0
1
ce !
o~ :
51 I
z
..
)9-7~
--:r-
~
~
~
!
:4 :;
- -
;; .. ;; ;;
- - -
~ ~ ~ ~
s ~ E ~ ~ =:= = ~
. ~ = ~ = = = = = = ~ ~ = =
II!
Iii Ii ; ~
~ i!
~! ~~;$ ; S ! 5 5 ~ i i a a E 5 ; =
..!: i
.."!;: . I
.... ~ ...
Ie... I
8~ J ~
~~ t. ~ 1 .~~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ S~ S~ ~ ~ ~ ~ "I~ ~
.... J .- B~.;_"= : : 1-.- · : : : : · :
~: .. -Ii - ca1 11 =1 1 1 51 51 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
!~..! ij= ~r~!t' ~ !i!i I!i I~ I! Ii II! II! II~ II~ Sl~ SI~ IS~ ~f !.
~ .0 " ~ = " ~ 0 0 ~ " " " ~ " "10 I~=:
-.:, j ~I~~~ ~ ~a~ a! I! i! a! Gg! Ag! ! !~! u! u! ~I.!
I ....... ~ ~~o co 0 goo 0 0 0 0 HO ~o 0
.: _ ~ .~4 ~f" g g 18 0 10 g g _g.o g == ~o g 180
_": I 11 .. II -:.I! 1:0 1:0 0 0 8 1I0 1I0 .0.8 0 1iI0 1I8 0
bol ~ .1 i :=...:1 . .. .. . . .. .. iii
18 r 8 .. l-=. =
-1.} I::{! ,,!";!-:'II
'" '":. ..-4.... 08
:: ...;......~ It := I
"I )088 "a
i~~~~~ : Iii i~Eel el el
"I~~~I ~ ill ~!~~~ =:1 5:~1
]....~i ~.. ~~~:~
....a~~ e .- ~a~ofi
11":-.4.;1':';1.1 1..4"
... ,-- - -
~
J
~
-
e
-
..
-
- e
..
- ~
~
.. ::; !
.. .. w ..
w w w "
tl
~
<::.
II II
~ ~
i i
~ ~ ~
: : i i i
I: I: I: I: I:
= = a = a I:
.
I I I
I:
o .
. .
" "
" ~ ~
.. .. ..
.. .. ..
nun
.
.
hhh
.. .. ..
Ii II Ii
000
10 10 10
el el el el el el el
. . . . ~ ~ .
~I 51 51 51 51 51 sl
el el el el el el el
.~. . . ~ " "
sl sl EI 51 51 51 51
) 'J ~7i.
:4 E 3 -
..
-
- - 5 ! -
~ ~ ..
:! - e :! :! e - e :! ... :! - ~ e ~
.! ~ .. e .. ..
0 .. .. 0 .. .. .. .. 0 0 0 0 fO .. .. 0 0 0 ... .. ... ...
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
. . iii iii iii
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
I I I ..... ..... ..... . . . . .
Ii E E .. .. .. ~ ~
. . . Ii Ii Ii Ii Ii
= = ~ i I I i i i Ii Ii Ii I I I I ! I I
iii iii iii it( i m m a
.. .. .. . II
,..,......0 000.....<1'4.."'.....11I
~ ~ ~ 0 <1'4 <1'4 .. <1'4 <1'4 ~ ~ ~ . . . . . 1ft tf'I 1ft 1ft WI
.. .. <1'4 ~ 0 0 0 0 tf'I . ~ . " " ft . . 1ft 1ft 1ft 1ft 1ft
.. .. <1'4 " .. <1'4 . . . . . . ~ ~ ~ <1'4 <1'4 " ft ft " "
.. .. .. .. 6: 6: .. .. .. M.. M.. M..
I- I- I- - -= -= ~ ~ -= ;= g= ;=
= 9= 9= ~~ == == 1= = n= 1= 1= 1=
;: ;: ;: !: a: a: i: i: I: :: ;: ~:
Ii Ii Ii Ii ii ii Ii Ii ii Hi Hi ~i
M !
I I I II II II II Ii i i
~ . ..WI.... gO gO 0 0 0
~: ~: 9: I: I: .:=..: .: I: I:.
... .. 1-4" .... .........-4
= = -: = = <1'4 = = g= s=
;i ;i ;i Ii Ii Ii Ii Ii Ii Ii
cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl
~ ~ . .. <1'4 <1'4 ~ ~ . 1ft . 1ft <1'4 <1'4 <1'4 ft ft ft ft ft . .
il il il il ~I ~I sl sl il il il il 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 51 il ii'
/9/77
2 - 2
- ::! ..
.. -
!. - ~ - ~
~ ..
::; ~ - ~ :! ~ ~ .. ~ ~
... ~ ... ... g ..
.. .. .. .. 0 0 .. .. .. 0 0 0 11= 0 .. .. .. .. 0
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
.. .. .. I ~
.. .. .. ..
. . . .
~ ~ Ii Ii ~ ~ ~ ~ I .
~ ~ ~ ~ = I I I I :i rc s Ii Ii Ii
II Ii Ii I I ~ = = = Ii Ii
... . . .. ..
.. .. .. .. 0 0 0 0 0
.. .. .. .. 0 .. .. .. .. .. .. 0 .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
.. .. .. .. .. 0 . . . .. .. ... .. - . . . 0 0
.. .. .. .. - .. . . . .. .. .. - .. .. .. .. .. ..
1 . 1
I: ~
- I: I: - - - - - - - - - - - i: i: i: - -
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
.. I~ I~ I~ .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
.. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
, I , I I I , I , I t t S, 8' S' , ,
, I; I; I; , , I' If I' .t , II f I~ S I ,
, I' ,
0 - = :I :: := ::l ::l .. ::l ... I- - .. ..
I: .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
15 15 15 15 h .... .So So
..0 0 0 0 .. ::: ..:= ....
1= .... .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
.... .. o. ... o. .. I: I: I: Ii Ii
.... .. .. ..... i; ..
. .. .. h
: II II n II: II ~I ~I ~I II II II ....
.0 Ii Ii Ii
"0 =g g8 18 18
Ig ig :10 10 0
.. I
cl cl
. ..
5i ii
1
cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl cl !
ii ii Ii ii ~i ~i ~i ii ii ~i ii ~i Ii ~i ~i Ii ~i ~i i
17-1Y/
o.
..
SAN DIEGO COUNTY
AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT
1994 ACCOMPUSHMENTS
Air Ouality
For the San Diego Air 8asin, 1994 was the cleanest air quality year on record. The
federal ozone standard was exceeded on only 9 days in San Diego County and
continued a downward trend. All other federal air quality standards were met.
Reclassification
In 1994, the San Diego County Air Pollution Control District (the District) submitted
documentation to the federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) that
convinced EP A to reclassify San Diego County from Severe to Serious. EP A had
initially classified San Diego County as a Severe ozone nonattainment area based on
an incorrect rounded ozone design value. As a prerequisite for approving the
reclassification request, EPA required that the District submit air quality simulation
modeling results to demonstrate that San Diego County could attain the federal
ozone standard by the 1999 attainment deadline for Serious areas. On August 1,
1994, the District submitted modeling results to EPA indicating that projected 1999
San Diego County emissions will not cause ozone concentrations above the 12 parts
per hundred million (pphm) federal ozone air quality standard.
The reclassification from Severe to Serious has relieved San Diego County
businesses from the more stringent and costly control requirements for Severe areas
that are not required for Serious areas. In Severe areas, smaller industries emitting
only half as much pollution are subject to costly control and administrative
requirements. New or expanding industries must also offset their emission
increases with 50% more emission reductions in Severe areas than in Serious areas.
The most costly and least cost-effective control requirement imposed on Severe
areas, the employer trip reduction program, is also not required in Serious areas.
1994 SIP Revision
In November 1994, the District submitted a State Implementation Plan (SIP)
revision demonstrating that currently adopted control measures are sufficient to
provide attainment of the federal ozone standard in San Diego County by 1999. The
1994 SIP Revision also revised the 15% Rate-of-Progress Plan originally submitted in
1993 to correct deficiencies identified by EPA and prevented the imposition of
sanctions.
/'1-7 ~
1994 APCD Accomplishments
Page 2
Mobile Source Emission Reduction Credits Rule
In November 1994, the District adopted Rule 27 enabling businesses to offset new or
increased emissions from stationary sources with emission reduction credits from
mobile sources. Mobile source emission reduction credits may be cre'lted by
scrapping old higher polluting cars, purchasing certified low-emission transit buses,
purchasing zero-emission (electric) vehicles, or retrofitting vehicles to meet low-
emission standards. Businesses can purchase mobile source emission reduction
credits from each other to meet emission offset requirements.
Federally Required Rules
In 1994, the District completed adopting rules required by the federal Oean Air Act
requirements for Reasonably Available Control Technology, New Source Review,
and Title V federal Operating Permits. EPA could, however, still require
amendments to the rules before fully approving them. Rule 1301, adopted in
January 1994 to meet federal Severe area requirements for employer trip reduction
programs, has become inoperative since San Diego County was reclassified to
Serious.
Power Plants NOx Rule
In January 1994, the District adopted Rule 69 to implement Best Available Retrofit
Control Technology, as required by state law, to reduce oxides of nitrogen (NOx)
emissions from power plant boilers.
Vehicle Registration Fund PrQjects
The District allocated $8.8 million in vehicle registration funds for 18 innovative
local programs to reduce pollution from motor vehicles. The smog-cutting
programs include pilot projects to scrap and retrofit old cars; the purchase of
compressed natural gas and electric vehicles; and ridesharing and telecommuting
projects to reduce vehicle trips.
Border Vehicle Task Force
AB2008 (Alpert), signed into law In September 1993, extended California vehicle
registration requirements, and consequently emission control requirements, to
foreign workers commuting to work in California. In June 1994, the District
established the Border Vehicle Task Force to address issues involved in
implementing the requirements of AB2008, including identification of commuter
vehicles, and ensuring compliance of the registration requirement. The Border
Vehicle Task Force is comprised of those local, county, lltate, and federal agencies,
and other interests, who would most likely be involved in implementing the
program.
GCS:gcs
/1-/t/tJ
AIR POLLmON CONlROL DlsmlCT
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
-
.. ,,-~
" "
. ,
, .
1993
ANNUAL REPORT
/c;~/tl/
-
A
I
R
P
0
L
L
U
T Brian P. Bilbray
I District 1
0 Dianne Jacob
District 2
N Pam Slater
District 3
C Leon L. Williams
District 4
0 John MacDonald
N District 5
T
R
0
L
B
0
A
R
0
A Year of Achievement
1993 was a year of Important achievements:
ttI The air was cleaner for the fifth straight year;
ttI The state Air Resources Board revised San Diego's non-
artainment classification for ozone (photochemical smog)
from severe down to serious;
ttI The srate designated the air basin as in attainment for
carbon monoxide;
ttI The District continued to streanUine the permit process,
cut red rape, and provide business with faster turnaround;
ttI A Small Business Assistance Service was opened; and
ttI $8.8 million in funds were allocated for 18 innovative local
programs to reduce pollution from motor vehicles.
Smog exceeded the state clean air standard only 90 days in 1993,
compared to 97 days in 1992 and 158 days in 1989. Our continued
improvement in air quality clearly demonstrates that air pollution
control measures on industty and automobiles are working.
Streamlining efforts to help business through the regulatory
process resulted in eight ~ignifIcant changes to reduce permit process-
ing time and [0 sinipli~ procedures and application forms. Also,
business and government'working closely together in 1993 resulted in
,. I
the opening of a Regiohal Permit Assistance Center in early 1994 to
provide businesses with a central "one-stop" location for permit
assistance. The Distrier also played a key partnership role in establish-
ing the San Diego Economic Development Corporation's "One-
Stop" Early Assistance program.
Solving our air quality problems cannot be accomplished by
government alone. Since cars are a major source of air pollution, each
person can contribute to improving the air by making small changes
in daily aerivities. If you drive less, carpool to work, or take the bus
or trolley - even just one day a week - you can make a difference.
?QMjJJ~
Pam Slater
Chairwoman
San Diego County Air Pollution Control Board
)/-/tJ;7
The San Diego County Air PoOution Control District's primary
focus is to reduce air pollution to levels that have been established to
protect public health. Although reduced visibility may he the more
obvious effect of air pollution, the health problems it causes are by
far more serious.
Air quality standards are set by both the federal Environmental
ProtectionAgency (EPA) and the state Air Resources Board (ARB)
based upon research that tkx:uments harmful pollutant levels. It's up
to the local air districts to meet and maintain these standards.
All of us face some health risk.from polluted air. But nearly
1.3 million county residents are at even greater risk - children whose
lungs are still developing, senior citizens with weakened immune
systems, and people with asthma, respiratory problems, and heart
disease.
Cleaning up our air is not an easy challenge but it can be done.
As you will read in other parts of this report, you can help meet this
goal. By driving your car less, watching the products you use, and
conserving energy, you can help clean up our air and improve our
quality of life.
A
p
C
o
).""
~ ~ "",. >
1
9
9
3
.' :,
. ...$.'
;', '-'
Table of Contents
Air Quality in 1993 ...................................................... 4
The Pollutants ............................................................. 5
Smog Trends ............................................................... 8
San Diego's Air Pollution Problem ............................... 9
The Clean Air Acts...................................................... 10
Accomplishments in 1993 ......................................... 11'
Ambient Air Quality Standards ................................... 14
Glossary of Air Pollution Terms .................................. 15
About the Air Pollution Control District...................... 16
10 Ways to Clear the Air............................................. 18
Pollutant Standards Index .......................................... 19
J9~/tJ}
;
1
1
1
I
1
L
Air Quality in 1993
For the fifth straight year, San Diego County's air quality continued to improve in
1993. Smog exceeded the state clean air standard only 90 days in 1993 compared to 97
days in 1992, 106 in 1991, 139 in 1990, and 158 in 1989.
In 1993, San Diego exceeded the federal standard 14 days compared to 19 days in
1992,27 in 1991,39 in 1990, and 55 in 1989.
A
P
C
D
San Diego's continued improvement in air quality indicates that control measures on
industry and especially smog controls on automobiles are working. Motor vehicles
account for 60 per cent of San Diego's smog-forming emissions.
The average car on the road is eight years old and much less polluting than older
vehicles. New cars are now fuel-injected and have computers that constantly monitor and
adjust air-to-fuel mixtures to reduce pollution.
Since 1983, all cars have been equipped with three-way catalytic converters. Older
catalytic models only reduced hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide emissions. The three-
way units also reduce the nitrogen dioxide emissions which contribute to smog formation.
San Diego did not have a Stage 1 smog episode in 1993. A Stage 1 episode occurs
when smog levels reach 200 on the pollution index (20 pphm).
. .
", f ~
Five health advisory episodes were issued last year. A health advisory is issued when
smog levels reach 138 on the pollulioi\ index and the community is advised to reduce
vigorous outdoor activity.
This was the third straight year that San Diego County did not exceed the state stan-
dard for carbon monoxide. State standards were also met for nitrogen dioxide, sulfur
dioxide, and lead; but not for ozone or inhalable particulates. With the exception of
ozone, San Diego met federal air quality standards for all criteria pollutants - carbon
monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, inha1able particulates, and lead.
1
9
9
3
/9-/tJ r
~
.
The Pollutants
The San Diego County Air Pollution Control District continuously samples the air to monitor pollutants. The
United States Government and the State of California have set clean air standards to provide an adequate margin
of safety in protecting public health. In setting its standards, California adopted stricter ones than those used
nationwide.
The federal government has identified six criteria pollutarlts: ozone (smog), carbon monoxide, nitrogen
dioxide, sulfur dioxide, lead, and inhaIable particulates (smaller than 10 microns). California regulates the
same pollutants plus three others: sulfates, visibility-reducing particulates, and hydrogen sulfide.
Smog (Ozone)
Ozone, commonly called smog, continues to be San Diego's primary pollution problem. It is fonned from
the chemical reactions of hydrocarbons and oxides of nitrogen in the presence of sunlight. A
The District monitors ozone (smog) at nine monitoring stations located throughout San Diego County. (See
table below.) The Alpine monitoring station recorded the most days in 1993 when ozone levels exceeded the air P
quality standards in the county. C
Short-term exposure to smog for an hour or two can add stress to the body. It is a strong irritant that can
cause constriction of the airways, forcing the respiratory system to work harder in order to provide oxygen. 0
Chronic exposure to ozone can damage deep portions of the lung even after symptoms such as coughing or
a sore throat disappear. Ozone can damage the alveoli, the individual air sacs in the lung where oxygen and
carbon dioxide are exchanged. Over time, this membranous, filmy tissue is permanently damaged, reducing its 1
ability to function and essentially accelerating the natural loss of lung capacity. Smog is especially harmful for 9
children, senior citizens, and those who suffer from heart or lung disease.
The state standard is 9 parts per hundred million (pphm) and the federal standard is 12 pphm. In 1993, 9
San Diego exceeded the state ozone standard on 90 days and !ile,federal standard on 14 days. 3
Smog (Ozone)
Number of DIY' Number of Houl'l' Number of Days Number of Houl'l
exceeding exceeding exceeding exceeding IIulmum l-11our
Station Fedoral Standard Federal Standard State Standard State Standard Cor_.b.Don llaI8 of IIulmum
l-110Uf l-Hour l-Hour 1-11.... Cork-Ib.don
Concanlralion eor..."bltlon eo.......,b 4tion Concanlralion Inpphm
> 12 pphm > 12 pphm > 9 pphm > 9 pphm
Alpine 10 25 69 240 0.19 Sept. 10
Chula Vista 1 1 11 18 0.13 Sept. 28
Del Mar 3 10 15 39 0.18 Sept. V
Downtown SO 0 0 4 6 0.11 Sept. 25
EICajon 2 3 22 46 0.14 Sept. 10
Escondida 1 4 16 45 0.15 Sept. 25
Keamy Mesa 3 4 14 32 0.15 Sept. V
Oceanside 4 11 7 21 0.16 Sept. 27
Otay Mesa 0 0 10 14 0.12 June 10
BASINWIDE 14 90
~ /t//p;/
~-,,~ -
A
P
C
o
1
9
9
3
NItrogen DIoxide
_of-' --
_A_ -. ,'- _of_
- -- -- ~.4, CCll_...
Sppllll ,.- CoI...........
>25pp111l Inppllll
~ 1.4 0 9 Dec. 10
ChulaVISIa 2.3 0 9 Sept.'ZT
Downlown SO 3.0 0 13 Sept. 28
EI Cajon .' . 2.7 0 10 Sept. 28
d:$-
Escondido . 2.5 0 14 Sepl'ZT
Keamy MeiIa . 2.7 0 12 Dee. 28
Oceanside 2.4 0 12 Fob. 3
0Iay Mesa 2.2 0 9 Dee. 8
Carbon Monoxide
_ofDoya _ofDoya
-. -. - -of_mum
- -- -- ~A_ ~A_
~A_ ~A_ co._~4Ik..1
Conc..iL.L.. COil_.LAo. Inppm COUCitl,lIlduA
>Ippm > 1.0 ppm
ChulaVISIa 0 0 2.8 Sept 8
Curbside 0 0 7.1 Dee. 3
Downlown SO 0 0 5.5 Jan. 26
ElCajon 0 0 4.0 Jan. 4
E....- 0 0 7.4 NoN. 26
Keamy Mesa 0 0 32 Dec. 10
Oceanside 0 0 3.4 Dee. 2
.0Iay Mesa 0 0 4.4 Dee. 22
Nitrogen Dioxide
Nitrogen is the most common
element in the air. When nitrogen and
oxygen are forced together by the heat
of combustion, they Conn various com-
pounds called oxides of nitrogen, a
primary ingredient in smog fonnation.
Nitrogen dioxide also discolors the
atmosphere. The brown hare in the San
Diego skyline on cold mornings is
primarily due 10 this pollutant
An irritaling gas, nitrogen dioxide
can damage the cells lining the respira-
lory tract and increase susceptibility 10
infection.
Neither the federal nor the state
standard for nitrogen dioxide was
violated in 1993.
Sulfur DIoxide
Nu_ofDoya
_A_ -. _,.-
-- _of_
- -- 24&urA_ Cone_lb....... CoI~.
3pp111l CoI_,b.lk... In"""'"
>s"""",
ChulaVISIa 0.3 0 5.6 Juno 30
Downtown SO 0.3 0 4.7 JUyl
EI Cajon 0.1 0 2.0 Jan. 29
Escondido 02 0 1.7 Jan. 26
Keamy Mesa 0.3 0 6.6 Jan. 4
Oceanside 0.1 0 2.0 Apr. 17
0Iay Mesa 02 0 3.8 Sepl.13
~ /J-//?~
Carbon Monoxide
Carbon monoxide is a by-
product of incomplete combustion.
Aboul85percenlofcarbon
monoxide comes from auto tailpipe
emissions with the highest concen.
trations found in areas with
congested or high volumes of
traffic. This odorless, colorless gas
reaches peak levels during the
winter months.
Carbon monoxide is harmful
because it restricts the blood's
ability to carry oxygen 10 the body's
tissues.
There were no violations of the
state or federal carbon monoxide
standards in 1993.
Sulfur Dioxide
Sulfur dioxide is an irritating
colorless gas with a distinctive
odor. It is a major component of
acid rain and smog in Europe and
in the industrial areas of the United
States east of the Rockies.
It is not a problem in San
Diego because the county does not
have the heavy manufacturing and
refining associated with this
pollutant. State and federal stan-
dards for sulfur dioxide were not
exceeded in 1993.
Particulate Matter
(PMlO)
Particulate matter may be man-
made or natural substances and
may come from a variety of
industrial and mobile sources. They
may be emitted directly or formed
in the air by transformations of
gases.
Suspended particulate matter
10 micrometers (millionths of a
meter) or less in diameter is
referred to as PM 10. These tiny
particles are a potential health
problem because of their ability to
bypass the respiratory tract's
natural filtering system.
Even though all particles 10
microns or less are a health
problem, they affect different parts
of the respiratory tract depending
on their size.
PartIculate Malter (PM 10)
AnnulI AnnulI - l4-Hou'SImplo
-- -- -- -..-
- -- -- ISO ~s;m3 l4-Hou'SImple
SO~s;m3 30~s;m3 --
so~P3
C!>JIaV'1Sta 27 25 56 HoY.S
Downtown SO 34 29 74 Nov.S
a Cajon 34 30 80 0cl28
Escoodido 31 26 96 0cl28
Keamy Mesa 29 25 79 0cl28
OIay Mesa 44 39 159 Sepl28
Oceanside 29 26 68 0cl28
Particles 2.5 to 10 microns in
diameter tend to collect in the
upper portion of the respiratory
system affecting the bronchial
lUbes, nose and throat.
Those 2.5 microns and smaller
in diameter can infiltrate deeper
portions of the lung and remain
Lead
_ Standard St8ttStlncllrd
- QuII1oI1yA_ _IyA_
~_lb.tiOh Col_.b'"
.U~g/1n3 .1.5J.lWln3
Oownlown so .01' .01'
a Cajon .01. .01'
'lD.OOllTAAV.uAaECN.Y1HFIOUGHJIJNE 111113
Lead
. Historically, the use of lead compounds in
gasoline was a major source of lead in the
atmosphere, but as the use of leaded gasoline has
decreased, lead levels in the air have steadily
declined.
Lead particles small enough to be inhaled
into the lungs are readily absorbed into the
bloodstream and circulated throughout the body.
Lead targets the central nervous system where
damage can range from subtle behavioral
changes to loss of muscle control and learning
difficulties.
Both the federal and state standards for lead
were met in 1993.
i
I
there longer, increasing the risks of
long-term disease. .
In 1993, federal standards for
PM 1 0 were not exceeded although
one violation occured; federal
standards allow for one violation.
However, state standards for PMI0
were not met.
A
P
C
D
1
9
9
3
1
r-
9
9
3
A
p
C
D
Smog Trends
Smog transported from Los Angeles was a key factor in 13 of the 14 days when air quality violated federal
standards. Although this appears to represent an upsurge in transported pollution, in actuality it represents a
refined analysis of the source of San Diego's smog.
A detailed study of the San Diego airshed analyzed specific days when air quality and transport patterns were
intensively monitored using aircraft and ground sites. The study determined thal winds above the ocean surface
and aloft transported more polluted air from the Los Angeles air basin than had previously been thought. The
lack of monitoring stations over the ocean has made it difficult to determine the extent of the transport influence.
Of the 90 days in 1993 when state standards were exceeded, 51 days (57 per cent) were primarily caused by
transport from Los Angeles and 39 days (43 per cent) from locally-generated pollution.
Number of Days Exceeding Federal Clean Air Standard
(>12 pphm)
100
80
60
!II
(64'1\)
40 'S1
(61'1\) 32 41
(63'1\) 36 34 1lI 32 (75'1\)
(72'1\) (74'1\) (71'1\) 1lI
20 (65'1\) (67%)
0
1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 '. 1987. 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992
Number of Days Exceeding State Clean Air Standard
(>9 pphm)
200
150
101
(53'1\)
7B
(49'1\)
Sl
(39'1\)
70 19
(49'1\) (53'1\)
4Il
(39'1\)
100
50
o
1981 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993
o Transport Days . Local Days
~ J'7-/t:1Y
San Diego's Air Pollution Problem
Although 57 per cent of the days San Diego exceeded the state clean air standards were primarily caused by
transport pollution from Los Angeles, still 43 per cent were a result of locally-generated emissions. Emissions
from automobiles and industry (oxides of nitrogen and reactive hydrocarbons) react in San Diego's abundant
sunshine to create photochemical smog.
These emissions are generated in the populated coastal plain and are blown inland by the onshore breeze to
the lower mountain slopes stretching from Palomar Mountain south to the border. The problem is further
intensified by the presence
of a temperature inversion
layer that traps these
pollutants and prevents
them from rising. A
A temperature inversion
is a layer of warm air lying P
above a layer of cooler air. C
The inversion layer is
around 2,000 feet during D
the peak smog season -
May through October.
Emission Sources
{;,..',,!
Reactive Hydrocarbons
Oxides of Nitrogen
.~
..~.
.,:~
.~ .....~
::::::::::::::;:.... Cars,
................... Tr k
:::::!:!::::::!::::::!:::.:..' uc S
:::.:.:.::::.:+::::~:~::~;+1+:>>- & B
.~ uses
70%
Other Mobile
18%
Industrial
Commercial
18%
Industrial
Commercial
11%
Agricultural
Residential
17%
Agricultural
Residential.
1%
Reactive Hydrocarbons + Oxides of Nitrogen + Sun = SMOG
/ /9~/t:l7
1
~
9
3
_ .. ._..w~.","
A
P
C
o
1
J
9
3
The Oean Air Acts
Both the United States Government and the State of California have enacted legislation designed to improve
air quality.
The federal 1990 Clean Air Act is a federal law covering the entire country. Under this law, the federal
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) sets limits on how much of each pollutant can be in the air anywhere in
the U.S. The law allows individual states to have stronger pollution controls, but states are not allowed to have
weaker controls than those set for the entire country.
EPA has identified non-attainment areas for each criteria pollutant EPA then classified the non-attainment
areas according to the extent of the pollution. There are five classes of non-attainment areas for smog ranging
from marginal (relatively easy to clean up quickly) to extreme (which will take a lot of work and along time to
clean up).
The 1990 Clean Air Act uses this new classification system to tailor clean-up requirements to the severity of
the pollution and set deadlines for reaching clean-up goals.
Under San Diego's current federal classification as a "severe" area, the federal act requires the following:
." The federal ozone standard must be attained by the year 2005.
." Emissions must be reduced 15 per cent between 1990 and 1996, and reduced 3 per cent each year
thereafter until attainment.
." Major source threshold of 25 or more tons per year of non-attainment pollutants or precursors.
." Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) on all major sources of non-attainment pollutants
or precursors.
." Pennitting program for new or modified major sources of non-attainment pollutants or precursors
requiring: (J) Lowest Achievable Control Technology (IAER) and (2) emissions offsets at a ratio of
1.3 to 1 to compensate for the increased emissions from the new or modified source.
." Transportation Control Measures (TCMs) to offset emissions from increased vehicle miles traveled
or number of vehicle trips., .' .
_1.$.
." Measures to require employers of 1 00 or !!lore to increase average vehicle occupancy in commuter
trips between home and the workplace:duting 'peak travel periods by at least 25 per cent.
." Enhanced motor vehicle inspection and maintenance program.
." Clean-fuel vehicle program.
California adopted its own Clean Air Act in 1988. This legislation set statewide guidelines for air districts in
developing strategies to reduce the sources of air pollution that contribute to smog. Areas were classified and
specific measures were required in their attainment plans based on the severity of their pollution problem.
The state reclassified the San Diego Air Basin in 1993 from severe to serious. (See page 11.) As a serious
area, San Diego is now subject to the following:
." A 5 per cent annual reduction in hydrocarbons and oxides of nitrogen emissions from 1987 until
standards are attained. If this 5 per cent reduction cannot be obtained, every feasible measure must
be implemented.
." Use of the Best Available Retrofit Control Technology (BARCT) for existing stationary sources.
." Pennitting program requiring (J) Best Available Control Technology (BACT) on new and modified
equipment that increases emissions of non-attainment pollutants or precursors by 10 or more
pounds per day, and (2) emissions offsets for all increases in emissions of non-attainment pollut-
ants or precursors at sources with emissions of non-attainment pollutants or precursors of 15 or
more tons per year.
." Transportation control measures (TCMs) to achieve an average of 1.4 persons per passenger
vehicle during weekday commute hours by 1999.
~ /1-////
--
AccompHshments in 1993
Smog Classifications
The stale Air Resources Board (ARB) lowered San Diego air basin's non-attainment area classification for
ozone (photochemical smog) from "severe" to "serious" in 1993. .
The change came after studies by the ARB and the District showed that days over 15 pphm were due to
pollution blown southward from the Los Angeles air basin. Under the California Clean Air Act, San Diego is not
required to control local emission sources to compensate for transport pollution from Los Angeles.
After eliminating the impact of transport upon San Diego's smog levels, the ARB concluded that the region's
smog classification should be changed to serious.
The ARB also wrote a letter to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) asking them to correct a reporting
error and reduce San Diego's federal smog classification from severe to serious.
The federal classification is based on a value of 19 pphm, the fourth highest smog level recorded between
1987 and 1989 at the Del Mar monitoring station. The actual measurement was 18.5 pphm, but computer
software automatically rounded up the data to two-digit figures.
The cut point between serious and severe is 18 pphm. If three-digit figures are considered, San Diego would
be within the 5 percent culpoint and could qualify for the serious classification.
If EPA approves the reclassification to serious, the attainment deadline will be 1999, the major source
threshold will be raised to 50 tons per year, the offset ratio for new and expanded sources will be lowered to 1.2
to 1, and the employer trip reduction program will not be federally required and can be revised to reflect more
flexible stale requirements.
!
.',-.
_ i-~
:' 'oj
State CO Designation
In 1993, the California Air Resources Board
redesignated San Diego County as an attainment area
for the state carbon monoxide standard.
,'..f
~ 4'-'.
1,742
475
1,081
1,613
380
80
1,161
178
592
937,732
299
$521,659
6,137
Small Business Assistance
The Small Business Assistance Program got
underway in 1993 making it easier for small business
owners to understand and comply with District rules
and regulations.
Acting as a liaison between small business owners
and the District, the program is designed to resolve
issues and problems; provide information, technical
assistance, compliance training, and courtesy inspec-
tions; and make referrals to financial and business
resources.
The Small Business Assistance Program is initially
being funded through a two-year grant from the
Environmental Protection Agency.
Yearly Activity *
Permit Applications
Authorities to Construct
Permits to Operate
Engineering Evaluations
Sources Inventoried
Air Toxics Assessments
Notices of Violation
Notices to Comply
Complaint Investigations
Monitoring Hours
Source Tests
Penalties Collected
Persons Attended
District Presentations
· Figures from Fiscal Year 1992-1993
~ //-///
A
P
C
o
1
!.
9
3
1
( )
9
3
A
p
C
D
-
Pennit Streamlining
The District began implementing streamlined procedures to improve its permitting process in 1993.
A working group of District and local industry representatives met throughout the year to review the permit
issuance program in detail and evaluate ways it could be improved. The group developed a specific written
process for both businesses and the District that expedites the issuance of pennits within established time
frames.
One of the first new permit procedures launched was over-the-counter construction and operating permits
for certified dry cleaning equipment. Under this new procedure, permit applicants for new or replacement
equipment that is on the current list of certified dry cleaning equipment are issued an Authority to Construct at
the counter within an hour.
In addition, small solvent cleaning units that have been certified by the Engineering Division can receive
expedited permitting. More than 4,000 such units from one supplier were certified and permitted under this
procedure.
Trip Reduction
After two years of discussions, workshops and extensive feedback from the business community, the Air
Pollution Control Board voted unanimously on January 18, 1994, to adopt Regulation XIII, the employer trip
reduction program for worksites with 100 or more employees.
As a "severe" smog non-attainment region, San Diego County is required by the federal Clean Air Act to
implement an employer trip reduction program. The purpose of the program is to reduce the number of solo
commuters and increase the number of workers who take transit, carpool, vanpool, walk, bicycle, or
telecommute. .
Major components of the regulation include:
~ Implementation of the regulation in July 1995 for employers with 100 or more employees at a worksite.
~ A regional Average Vehicle Ridership (AVR) target of 1.41 by 1998.
~ A one-time trip reduction plan developed by emp~yers for review and approval by July 1996.
. . ~ I
~ An annual survey to establish an A VR baseline. and monitor progress.
,. ',I
At press time, the Environmental Protection Ageifcy'(EPA)'was reviewing the District's request to reduce San
Diego's federal smog classification from severe to serious as the state Air Resources Board did for the region's
state classification in July 1993. If EPA approves the request, San Diego County would no longer be required to
implement a federal trip reduction program.
Notice to Comply Program
The District implemented a Notice to Comply program as an enforcement tool for certain rule violations.
A Notice to Comply differs from a Notice of Violation in that it does not result in penalties provided
corrective action is taken in a timely manner. A Notice to Comply is issued primarily for violations that are not
directly related to the control of emissions and when a business had no knowledge of the requirements.
Motor Vehicle Fee
Eighteen local programs were allocated $8.8 million in funds to reduce pollution from motor vehicles.
Funding came from the $2 annual vehicle registration fee collected to implement innovative projects to reduce
motor vehicle emissions as required by the California Clean Air Act.
The smog-cutting programs included two pilot projects to scrap and retrofit old cars; the purchase of com-
pressed natural gas and electric vehicles; and ridesharing and telecommuting projects to reduce vehicle trips.
/ J'J-//;:l
TItle V Federal Operating Pennits
A new regulation, Regulation XIV, was developed to implement the federal operating permits program
required by Tide V of the federal Clean Air Act of 1990. Regulation XIV primarily affects major sources of air
contaminants.
In developing the new regulation, the District participated in a task force sponsored by the California Air
Pollution Control Officer's Association that included representatives from many local air districts in California,
the Air Resources Board, and the Environmental Protection Agency. In addition, the District worked closely with
local businesses and the military affected by the program.
New Source Review Rules
Working with industry and the military, the District continued deVelopment of New Source Review rules that
will go to the Air Pollution Control Board for adoption in mid-I994. The proposed rules address new state and
federal regulatory requirements.
The proposed rules wiD require controls on new or modified stationary and portable emission units with the
potential to emit 10 or more pounds per day of non-attainment pollutants (and precursors). The proposed rules
wiD also require emission offsets to mitigate the air quality impact of emission increases from new and modified
equipment at stationary sources that have the potential to emit 15 or more tons per year of non-attainment
pollutants (and precursors).
Streamlined Building Pennit Process
In an effort to minimize the regulatory burden placed on new and expanding businesses, the Air Pollution
Control District and Environmental Health Services have streamlined the process for obtaining a building
permit. '" " ,
Under the streamlined program, each agency can act ()Ii ifie other's behalf and issue an "exempt from
permit requirements" stamp on the Air PollutionIHazardQUs.Materials Questionnaire when the applicant's
proposed project is exempt from the other agency's permit requirements.
Other Accomplishments
During 1993, the District also: ,
Developed Rule 69 to limit emissions of oxides of nitrogen from electrical generating steam boilers.
Working with San Diego Gas and Electric, the new rule sets new NOx emission limits for all electrical generating
steam boilers with heat input ratings equal to or greater than 100 million British thermal units (Btu's) per hour.
Established a complaint referral process with Environmental Health Services and AgriculturelWeights &
Measures. Rather than referring the eaDer, the agency originally receiving the complaint wiD ensure that the
appropriate agency is notified. .
Developed customer service survey forms to accompany each permit issued by the District and each
compliance inspection. The purpose of the surveys is to provide ongoing feedback on the level of service pro-
vided by the District.
Revised kelp processinglbiogum manufacturing rule.
Continued development of Reasonably Available Control Technology (RACT) rules for major volatile
organic compounds and oxides of nitrogen sources to meet requirements of the Federal Clean Air Act.
~ /1-//;1
A
P
C
D
1
1
9
3
....... ~~ '"
A
p
C
o
1
9
9
3
Ambient Air Quality Standards
California Standards
National Standards
Pollutant A VOI'lllPnl Tlmo COIICOIItnlloo Molbod Primary Sotondary Molbod
IH"", 0.09 ppm 0.12 ppm Same as Primary Ethylene
Om.. (23.5.,.glm3) Chemiluminescence
8H"", 9.0 ppm Non.Dispersive 9_ Non.Oispersive
Carbon (IOmg/mJ) Infrared Spectroscopy (I0mglm3) Infrared Spectrascopy
Moooxldo I Hour 20ppm (NDIR) 3S_ (NDIR)
(23mg/m3) (40mglm3)
Annual Average - 0.053 ppm
NI......n 0.. Ph... (JOO~glm3) Same as Primary G"......
Dioxide 0.25 ppm Chemiluminescence Swxlud. Chemiluminescence
IH"", (470 j.lg/m3)
Annual Average 8OIlglm3 -
(0.03 ppm)
24 Hour 0.04 ppm 36S ~g/m3 -
Sulfur (IOS~g/m3) Ultraviolet (0.14_) Pararosaniline
DIoJddo Auorescence 1300j.lg/m3
3 Hour - (O.5ppm)
I Hour 0.25 ppm -
(65.5j.lglm3)
Suspended Annual Mean 3O~g/m3 Size Selective SO ~g/m3 High Volume
Particulate Matter Inlet High Sampling
(PM to) 24 Hour SOllgfmJ Volume Sampler ISOJlglm3
Turbidimetric -
Sulfates 24 Hour 2S~g/m3 Barium Sulfate
30 Day Average 1..5llglm3 - -
Load Atomic Absorplion Atomic Absorption
Calendar Quarter U~g/m3 Same as Primary
Hydrogen SulOde J Hour 0.03 ppm Cadmium HydroJr;ide -
(42j.lglm3) Stracu.R ~
Vinyl Chlorldo 24 Hour 0.010 ppm TedJar B..g CoJlection.
(Chloroethene) (26 "g/m3) Gas Chromatography
Visibility In sufficient amounllo product" an btlnclion .
coefficienl of 0.23 per Ir.ilometerdue to pani<:les ".
Reducing I Observation when relative humidity < 7Q'if. Measurement in
Particles acwtdance with ARB Method v.
Notes:
I. California standards, other than ozone, carbon monoxide, sulfur
dioxido (I hour), nitrogen dioxide, and particulato matter (PM,,),
are values that are not to be equaled or exceeded. The Olone,
carbon monoxide, sulfur dioxide (I hour), nitrogen dioxide, and
particulate matter (PMIO) standards are not to be exceeded.
2. National Slandards, other than ozone and those based on annual
averages or annual geometric means, are not 10 be exceeded more
than once a year. The ozone standard is attained when the
expected number of days per calendar year with maximum hourly
average concentrations above standard is equal 10 or less than one.
l Concentration expressed first in units in which U was promulgated.
Equivalent units given in parentheses are based upon a reference
temperature of 250C and a reference pressure of 760 mm of
mercury. All measurements of air quality are to be corrected to a
reference temperature of 250C and a reference pressure of 760
mm ofmorcury (1,013.2 millibar). ppm in this Jable rofors 10 ppm
by volume or micromoles of pollutanl per mole of gas.
4. Any equivalent procedure that can be shown to the satisfaction of
the Air Resources Board to give equivalent results at or near the
level of the air quality Slandard may be used.
5. National Primary Slandards: The levels of air quality ne<essary,
with an adequate margin of safety, 10 prolOCl tho public health.
Each stale must allain the primary standards within a specified
number or years after that state's implementation plan is approved
by tho Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
6. National Secondary Slandards: Tho levoIs of air quality ne<ossary
10 protect tho public welfare from any known or anticipated
adverso ollects of a poUUIanL Eacb Slate must attain tho secondary
standards within a "reasonable time" after the implementation
plan is approved by tho EPA.
7. Roferenco mothod as described by tho EPA: An "equivalent
method" or measurement may be used but must have a "consistent
relationship 10 the reference method" and must be approved by
the EPA.
8. Prevailing visibility Is defined as the greatest visibility that is
attained or surpassed around at least half of the horizon circle bUI
not necessarily in continuous sector.
9. The annual PMIO state standard is based on the geometric mean of
all reponed values taken during tho year. The annual PM"nationai
Slandard is based on averaging tho quarterly arithmetic means.
y II-Ill
Glossary of Air Pollution Terms
ACID DEPOSmON-The conversion of sulfur oxide
and nitrogen oxide emissions into acidic compounds
thai. precipitate in rain, snow, fog, or dry particles.
AIR MONITORING-Sampling and measuring
pollutants present in the abnosphere.
AIR BASIN-An area with common and distinctive
meteorological and geographical featUres. The borders
of the San Diego Air Basin are the boundaries of San
Diego County.
AIR RESOURCES BOARD (ARB)---{;alifornia's state
agency responsible for clean air programs. The ARB
controls mobile pollution sourCes but delegates its
authority over stationary sources (such as factories) to
local air quality districts.
AMBIENf AIR-Outside air.
AlTAlNMENf-Legal recognition thai. an area meets
standards for a particular pollutant
BACf-Best Available Control Technology.
EMISSION INVENTORY-A listing, by source, of
pollutants emitted into a community's abnosphere in
amounts (commonly tons) per day or year.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROI'EcnON AGENCY (EPA)-
The federal agency concerned with air quality.
HYDROCARBONS-Any of a vast family of com-
pounds containing carbon and hydrogen in various
combinations, found especially in solvents and fuels.
Most of the hydrocarbon compounds are major air
pollutants. They may be active participants in the
photochemical process.
INVERSION-A layer of warm air in the abnosphere
that lies over a layer of cooler air, trapping pollutants.
LAER-Lowest Achievable Emission Rate.
MIXING HEIGID'-Distance from the ground to the
top of the mixed layer of the abnosphere; a measure of
the volume of air available to dilute pollutants.
NITROGEN OXIDES (NOx) Gases formed prima-
rily from abnospheric nitrogen and oxygen when
combustion takes place, particularly under conditions
of high temperature.
OFFSET-An emission reduction thai. compensates
for an emission increase.
OZONE LA YER-A naturally occurring layer of ozone
seven to 30 miles above the earth's surface in the
stratosphere. The ozone layer filters out the sun's
harmful ultraviolet radiation. It is nOI affected by the
ozone in photochemical smog found in the lower
abnosphere. There is no mixing between ozone at
ground level and ozone in the upper abnosphere.
PHOTOCHEMICAL-Requiring the presence of
sunlight for a chemical reaction.
POLLUfANT SfANDARDS INDEX (PSI)-A system
of reporting air pollution levels to the public by
assigning them a numerical value.
RISK ASSESSMENf-Evaluation of expected health
impacts on a specific population.
SMOG--Original1y an English term contracting
"smoke" and "fog," it is used in California to describe
the mixture of pollut3nts primarily composed of ozone
and oxidants.
TOPOGRAPHY-The configuration of a land surface,
including its relief and the position of its natural and
man-made features.
TOXIC-! substance that is poisonous or harmful to
human health, plants or animals.
TRANSPORTATION CONI'ROL MEASURES (TCMs)-
Any measure designed to reduce emissions from
tranSJ!i>rtation such as carpooling, changing traffic
flow patterns, or using mass transit to improve air
quality.
VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUND (VOC)-An
organic compound thai. readily evaporates at normal
temperatures; some are smog-forming.
Units of Measurement
m' cubic meter.
mm millimeter; equal to 1/1,000 of a meter.
/lIII micrometer; equal 1/1,000,000 of a meter.
mil mllligram; equal to 1/1,000 of a gram.
Illl microgram; equal to 1/1,000,000 of a gram.
ppm parts per mlllion; the number ofparts ofagiven
pollutant in one million pans of air.
ppbm pans per hundredmillion; thenumberof pans of
a given pollutant in one hundred million parts
of air.
/'1---//
A
P
C
D
1
9
3
A
P
C
D
1
9
3
About the District
The San Diego County AIr Pollution Control District is the local regulatory agency responsible for protecting
air quality and the public's health from the adverse impacts of air pollution. The District's primary goal is to
meet and maintain air quality standards at the earliest possible date.
Key Divisions
Engineering
The Engineering Division manages a permit system to ensure that potentially polluting operations and
industrial equipment meet the emission standards set forth in District rules and regulations and sections of the
Health and Safety Code. Permits are required both prior to construction or installation and again before any
operation begins for any process or equipment that is capable of emitting air contaminants.
Engineering is responsible for developing air quality rules and regulations, preparing stationary source
emissions inventories, implementing air toxic emissions inventory and control programs, and evaluating special
projects that impact air quality.
Monitoring & Technical Services
The Monitoring and Technical Services Division maintains ten monitoring stations that continuously record
pollution levels and meteorological information. Citizens can call a smog recording updated daily with maximum
pollution levels by station and the forecasted pollution levels for the next day. The recording also provides
advance notice if there is the possibility of a health advisory or smog alert.
Monitoring also performs laboratory and field testing for stationary sources of air pollution, prepares
regular and special air quality reports, and administers DlStrict emergency contingency plans.
~,. ,_I
. ~ 4'-'
Compliance
The Compliance Division assists industry in understanding and complying with District rules and state law.
Advisories are sent when new regulations are adopted to explain the new requirements to all those affected.
Compliance advisories are also sent to explain District policies and procedures on a variety of compliance issues.
Field inspectors check both permitted and non-permitted sources of air contaminants to make sure permit
conditions and air pollution laws are followed. Compliance staff investigates citizen complaints about odors,
smoke and other emission problems.
Air Resources & Strategy Development
Air Resources & Strategy Development (ARSD) develops long-term regional plans to reduce unhealthful
pollution levels including transportation control measures to reduce the number of trips and travel. These plans
outline specific strategies and control measures to achieve clean air standards set by the federal and state
governments.
r//~//?
Administration
The San Diego County Board of Supervisors is
the Air Pollution Control Board for the San Diego Air
Basin.
The Board adopts local rules for controlling air
pollution and allocates funding for the District's
operations. The District's funding comes from the
state and federal governments and from fees and
penalties charged to local businesses and industries.
Appointed by the Board, the Air Pollution Control Officer is responsible for all District programs and
represents the District before the Board.
The Air Pollution Control Officer also analyzes and participates in the formation of federal and state policy,
legislation and regulations on air quality.
AIR POu.unON CONTROL DISTRICT
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
The Hearing Board
t
~
.
Established by state law, the Hearing Board consists of five members (an attorney, an engineer, a medical
expert, and two representatives of the public).
Although appointed by the Air Pollution Control Board, the Hearing Board is an independent quasi-judicial
body.
Variances are granted only by the Hearing Board. It also hears appeals of operating conditions set by the
District, appeals concerning pemtit denials, and staff requests for pemtit revocations and abatement orders.
.' .
..$
- .
Citizen Participation
The Air Pollution Control District encourages citizens to get involved in District activities by
attending District workshops, hearings, and Board meetings or by serving on a citizen advisory
committee.
Public participation is vital in the rule development process. Workshops are conducted by
District staff to discuss a proposed rule and its potential impact so that any necessary revisions can
be made in the early stages. Public hearings are also held prior to any rule adoption or amendment
to allow citizens ample opportunity to voice their concerns.
The District also encourages representatives of local industries and interested citizens to
participate on District advisory committees. These committees are formed to advise and assist the
District in preparing and developing District programs, procedures, budget, and policies.
~ JJ~//?
A
P
C
D
1
&
9
3
A
P
C
D
1
d
9
3
1.
2.
10 Ways to Clear the Air
What can you do about air pollution? Here are some simple suggestions:
Reduce your driving. Whenever possible,
combine errands, carpool, use public
transportation, ride a bicycle, or walk.
Telecommute (work from home) or work
longer hours fewer days a week.
Keep your car in good running condition
and the tires properly inflated. Also, use '
less-polluting reformulated gasoline or
drive a clean-fuel vehicle.
2. Don't top off your gas tank. Gasoline
J. spillage evaporates and contributes to
smog. It also contains toxic pollutants.
6.
7.
4 Support the smog check program. Remov-
. ing emission control equipment does not ,
improve engine performance.,
,~.f'"
. -. ~ I
5.
Report "smoking" vehicles. Call 1-800- ZlV; ,
,~ ;4<-,
SMOKE to report vehicles with excessive '
tailpipe emissions. . 8.
m
. .
.
9.
10.
Around the home, avoid the use of aerosol
spray products. Most aerosol propellants
contribute to smog.
Use water-based paints and solvents. Oil-
based paints contain three to five limes more
toxic solvents than water-based, latex paints.
Also, keep lids closed when not in use and
paint with brushes or rollers rather than
sprayers.
When you fire up the barbecue, use an
electric probe, a chimney that uses newspa-
pers or new lighter fluid that produces less
emissions than traditional charcoal lighter .
Use energy-effidentlightiIig wherever
possible. Make sure lights and appliances
are turned off when not in use. In addition,
raise the temperature level on your air
conditioner a few degrees in summer and
turn down the heat a few degrees in winter.
Install solar energy. Water and space heating
account for more than 50 per cent of
household energy use.
~ /7/;l1~
,
to-Mile Trip Hydroaubon Fn1i~ons
1/3 Reduction
with Hot Start
Jlunning
5_
IInnning
5_
COLD
START
13 grams
HOT
START
8.3 grams
Cars Pollute Most During Start-up
More than half of the pollution happens when first starting the car. This is called a cold start. It takes about
eight minutes to wann up the catalytic converter so it will operate efficiently. Hydrocarbon emissions generated
during start-up are six times as polluting as the emissions during a to-mile conunute.
If the car sits for more than an hour, the cold start process begins again. By combining errands into one
trip, you can significantly lower your car's contribution to air pollution.
Pollutant Standards Index
Many people, especially those who suffer from illnesses aggravated by air pollution, need accurate and
easily understandable information about daily levels. This information allows them to modify their activities
when air pollution levels are high.
One way of conveying air pollution
information is to report the concentration
of each pollutant. However, different pol-
lutants affect health at different concentra-
tions; thus anyone wanting to act on the
information must remember several dif-
ferent sets of numbers.
The Pollutant Standards Index (PSI)
was developed by the Environmental Pro-.
tection Agency (EPA) to avoid this problem
by relating similar degrees of health effects
to a uniform numerical scale that is based
on actoal pollutant concentrations. This
chart shows how intervals on the PSI scale
relate to the potential health effects of
ozone at the measured concentrations.
---
.
275 . Stalle II Alert
(35 parts per l1undred million)
Everyone should remain indools.
200 - Stalle I Alert
(20 parts per nundred million)
General public should avoid
strenuous outdoor activities.
138 . Health Advisory
(15 parts per hundred million)
Athletes should avoid strenuous
outdoor activities.
100 - Federal Standard
(12 perts per hundred million)
75 - State Standard
(9 parts per hundred million)
Sens"ive persons should
reduce strenuous outdoor
activities.
.
.
~
.
~ //-J/1
A
p
C
D
1
9
3
~. '. ~ ......~ ..r'
California Air Resources Soan.
1988 California Clean Air Act ·
,
, E11viron~1 Profectjo,n Agen
1990 Fed;ral Clean Air Act
Citizen
Advisory
Committees
San Diego County Air Pollution Control Board
Hearing
Board
Air Pollution Control Officer
Engineering
Air Monitoring
Compliance
Air Resources
& Strategy Development
Monitoring & Compliance Air Resources &
Technical Services Strategy Development
Air Quality industrial
Monitoring inspections
Stationary Source Citizen Complaint
Testing d . investigations
.. .
.,
,
Stationary Source . . Mutuai Settlement
Test Witnessing Program
Meteorology Hearing Board
& Modeling Liaison
instrument Support, Asbestos Notification
Ambient Operation Removal Program
& Maintenance
Engineering
Chemical
Mechanical
Air Toxics
Vapor Recovery
missions Invento
Rule Development
Special Projects
Administrative Services
Small Business
Assistance
Clerical
& Personnel
Public Information
Data Management
Accounting
& Finance
o PRINTED ON RE€YCLED PAPER
) <j ;' I ;L(/
--
. PaIJIWI a-. limn
CDUny Of III DIIID
Air Pollu"on Conltolllo..d
BriJ.n P. BdbrJ\ DlStrl(! !
Dianne J~'ob Dlsm..:f ~
Pamcld SI.;ur [)ismt.:r .~
Leon L. 'X"illiJms Db(j;d-+
John \far.::DonJ.ld DlsHh.:r'"
Air PoUudon Control Officer
R. J. Somm<",lIo
SAN DIEGO HAS SIX STRAIGHT YEARS
OF IMPROVED AIR QUALfIY
Contact Bob Goggin
(619) 694-3332
San Diego County's air quality continued to improved in 1994 for the sixth straight
year.
According to preliminary data, smog exceeded the state clean air standard 79 days
in 1994, exactly half of the 158 days of unhealthful air recorded in 1989. The state standard
was exceeded on 90 days in 1993.
Federal standards were exceeded on nine days compared to 55 days in 1989 and 14
days last year.
Only one of the nine stations measuring air quality in San Diego County - the
mountain slopes station at Alpine - exceeded the federal standard for unhealthful air in
1994. "This is the first time that just a single station has exceeded federal standards since
air quality monitoring began in 1955," said Pam Slater, chairwoman of the Air Pollution
Control Board.
"The introduction of reformulated gas in 1995 and tougher pollution requirements
for cars in 1996 will reduce auto emissions over the next five years, creating the potential
for the region to achieve the federal clean air standard by 1999," Slater added. "Meeting
tougher state standards will take several years beyond the year 2000."
Motor vehicles account for about 64 percent of San Diego's smog-forming
emissions.
El Nino - the warmer water temperatures in the Pacific Ocean that affect weather
patterns - played a minimal role in the improved air quality this year.
-more-
ICJ -/;2.)
9150 Chesapeake Drive . San Diego . California 92123-1096 . (619) 694-3307
FAX (619) 694-2730 . Smoking Vehicle Hotline 1-800-28-SMOKE
.~
"
"
APCD 1994 SCORECARD
2-2-2
Clean air standards are set by the state and federal governments to provide an
adequate margin of safety in protecting public health. California's standards are stricter
than those used nationwide.
The state ozone standard is 9 parts per hundred million (pphm) or 75 on the
Pollutant Standards Index (PSI). The federal ozone standard is 12 pphm or 100 PSI.
Only one health advisory episode was issued in the County last year in Alpine. A
health advisory is issued when smog levels reach 15 pphm (138 PSI) and the community
is advised to reduce vigorous outdoor activity.
San Diego has not had a Stage 1 smog episode since 1991. A Stage 1 episode occurs
when smog levels reach 20 pphm or 200 PSI.
Additionally, this was the fourth straight year that San Diego County did not
exceed the state standard for carbon monoxide. State standards were also met for
nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and lead, but not for ozone (smog) or inhalable
particulates.
With the exception of ozone, San Diego met federal air quality standards for all
other criteria pollutants: carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, inhalable
particulates, and lead.
'"
94-19 (12/20/94)
/9/');2).
, "
State Smog Trend
San Diego County Air Pollution Control District
Numoo of Days with One-Hour Average Levels Exceeding the Stale Standard for Clean Air
(9 Parts Per Hundred Million of Ozone or 15 PSI - Pollutant Standards Index)
"-
'-./::)
,
""-
~
Monitoring Stations 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 " 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994....
Downtown San Diego 23 12 8 9 22 26 23 8 5 0
Oceanside 36 31 19 22 21 14 13 12 7 2
Del Mar 48 43 27 30 36 23 28 18 19 4
Escondido 43 12 27 39 40 26 27 25 16 10
Keamy Mesa 48 27 22 24 31 29 25 15 15 2
Chula Vista 28 20 15 17 21 21 13 14 12 4
Alpine 128 92 105 137 137 123 77 81 78 71
El Cajon 48 55 24 43 38 46 31 27 23 11
OIay Mesa 42 28 16 10 9
Days Over Standard 148 131 121 160 158 139 106 97 90 79
San Diego Air Basin
Local Sources 69 64 79 82 96 86 52 57 39 -
L.A. Transport 79 67 48 78 62 53 54 40 51 -
Stage 1 Episodes 4 0 1 2 2 1 1 0 0 0
Health Advisories 6 6 5 1
..I'rt'hmin..ry .t.lt..
tll....hh ^,lvl~lry n'I'.'rlln~ ht.~.1Il1U 1''''1
12/111/11'" I'ul.h. In'.,rnuh,"'( 111'0,'
"-.
~
\
'-...
'tv
~
Federal Smog Trend
San Diego County Air Pollution Control District
Number of Days with One-Hour Average Levels Exceeding the Federal Standard for Clean Air
(12 Parts Per Hundred Million of Ozone or 100 PSI - Pollutant Standards Index)
Monitoring Stations 1985 1986 1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994....
Downtown San Diego 5 2 1 2 9 6 7 1 0 0
Oceanside 15 10 7 7 8 4 3 2 4 0
Del Mar 12 13 11 9 16 9 7 3 3 0
Escondido 12 2 6 7 9 8 7 6 1 0
Keamy Mesa 14 7 5 7 c) 13 8 6 3 0
Chula Vista 4 2 2 4 7 3 3 4 1 0
Alpine 33 26 25 34 38 26 13 12 10 9
EI Cajon 9 3 2 8 5 8 4 4 2 0
Olay Mesa 7 2 3 0 0
Days Over Standard 50 46 40 45 55 39 27 19 14 9
San Diego Air Basin
Local Sources 14 12 14 13 14 13 8 8 1 -
LA. Transport 36 34 26 32 41 26 19 11 13 -
Stage 1 Episodes 4 0 1 2 2 1 1 0 0 0
.. Preliminary data
12/211/94 .'ublit: InftJf"m.lIlilJn DUke
.
. "
i
,
Federal Resilter / Vol. 60, No, 12 / Thursday, January 19, 1995 / Rules and Regulations
3771
iilterim approval expires FebNary 19.
1997.
(b) Reserved.
IFR Doc. 95-928 Filed 1-1&-95, 8:45 ami
"LUNG COOl ~
40 CFR Part 81
(CA-l03-1-4722 FRL-41Z&-2j
Deslgnatlon 01 A_lor Air Quality
Planning Purpo_: S~. 01 Call1omla;
Correction 01 Design Value lor San
Diego Ozone Nonanalnmen1 A_:
RaclUalllcallon 01 San Diego Ozone
Nonanalnmen. A_IO Sertoua
AGENCY: Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
SUMMARY: This document announces the
EPA Region IX decision to reclassify the
San Diego. California. ozone
nonattainment area (San Diegol from
,,"ere to serious. San Diego was
classified as a severe ozone
nonattainment area bv EPA on
November 6.1991 (56 FR 56694).
However. EP.'1 has determined that the
ozone design "alue of . 190/pm
published b~' EPA and use in
classifying San Diego as a severe ozone
nonattainment area was incoJ:l'8ct. The
correct monitored ozone design value
was .185 ppm. This design value falls
within the range of values which would
ha"e provid.d the opportunity for the
State to request reclassification of San
Di.go under section 181(a)(4) of the
CI.an Air Act, as amended in 1990
(CAA or the Act). Pursuant to Helion
110(k) of the Act, which allows EPA to
corr.ct its actions. EP A is today
publishing the correct design value of
.185 ppm and is granting the State's
request to reclassify the San Diego
nonattainment area under section
181(a)(4).
EFFEcnYl DATI: February 21, 1995.
FOR FUImIIII INFORMATION CONTACT:
Angela Boranco. Plans Development
S.ction IA-2-21. Air Planning Branch,
United States Environmental Protection
Ag.ncy, Region IX. 75 Hawthorne
Street. San Francisco, California,M105,
(415) 744-1196.
IUI'I'LIIIINTAIlY INFOAIIIATION:
.acJcaroUDd
Prior to the 1990 amendments to the
Act, EP A Identified and designated
nonattainment areas with respect to tha
National Ambient Air Quality Standards
(NMQS). For such areu, Stat..
submitted Stile Implementation Plans
(SIPs) to control amilllons and achieve
attainment of the NMQS. The San
Diego ozone nonattainment area (San
Diego) was originally designated as
nODlttainrnent for ozone on March 3.
1978 (as well as for other pollutants not
eddzessed In this document). The SIP
for San Diego was first adopted In the
early 1970's. The revised SIP was fully
epproved by EPA on November 25. 1983
(48 FR 53114) and Dec.mbotr 28. 1983
(48 FR 57130).
Und.r the 1990 amendments to the
Act, San Diego retained its designation
of nonattainment and was classified as
severe by operation of law pursl.llJ1tto
sections 107td) and 181(a) upon the date
ofenactment of the CAA. See 56 FR
56694 (November 6. 1991). This
classification was required to be based
on the design value for the area. The
ectual monitored value for San Diego
was .185 ppm. This value was reported
to the California Air ResoW'Ces Board
(CARS). which round.d the value to .19
ppm and submitted it to EPA. EPA
published this number as .190 ppm In
its November 6, 1991 Foderal a.p.t...
document. -
CAA Proviaio.... -
A. Correction' af ElTOr l'nder Section
110(kJ(6/
Section 110(k)(6) of the Act provides:
When8\"r tb. Administrator detenninn
that the Administrator'llction approving_
dillpproving. or promulgating any plan or
plan revision (or pan thereof). are.
desisnltion. redllignltion. cJulification. or
ncwsificatiOD WI' in .rror. the
AdmiDiltntor IUIV in the sam. manner I' tb.
appro"al. dillpp.oval. or promullation
Nvile such action u appropriate without
N'luirinl any furth.r ."bmillion from th.
Stat.. Such datorminstion and th. bui.
thoreof .ball be provided to th. State sod
public.
B. Classification ILdjustment Under
Section J8J(a)(4)
Section 181(a)(4) of.the Act pro,'id.s
a 90-day period following publication of
e classification during which any
nonattainrnenl area with a design ,'alu.
within 5 percent of. the next high.r or
lower classification may requesl to be
reclassified. When EP." publish.d .190
ppm as the ozone design ,'alue. the San
Diego planning staff concluded it could
not take advantage of the five-p.rc.nt
classification ad.jusunent pro\'ision
because this value does not fan within
5 percenl of the cutof.! for classification
IS serious. However. the correct value cf
.185 ppm does fan within 5 perc.nt of
this number (.179 ppm). When the
discrepancy In the ozone design "alu.s
was disco,'ered. the State requ.sted that
EPA reclassify San Di.go. After
determining that the original
classification had been based on an
erroneous design value. and that th.
error may be corrected pursuant to
section 110(kl(6), EPA accept.d Ih.
State's request. made by l.tter dated )ul\'
19, 1993, to reclassify the San Diego
ozone nonattainment area from severe to
seriOt1l under section 181(a)[.).
C. Criterio for Reclassification
Section 181(a)(4) of the CAA pro"id.s
generalguid.llnes to determine wh.th.r
an area qualifies for a classWcation
adjustment:
In mlkin8 such .diulunent. the
Administrator mn conlider the number of
exc"dances of the (NAAQSI for ozone In the
aree. the level of poJlution traDlpon between
the are. and other affected areas. including
both intrastatl aDd intentet, tranlpon. and
the m.ix of source. and air pollutant. in Ihe
ares.
EP A Interprets this pro,'ision 10 mean
that the area must demonstrate that it
can attain the ozone NAAQS b" the
earlier date required by the lo....r
classification. As discussed in more
detail jn subHelion 3 below, San Di.go
has submitted a preliminary
demonstration that "but for transpo:t".
It would attain the ozone NAAQS by tho
1999 attainment deedline for serious
areas. Documentstion concerning each
afthe section 181(a)(4) crit.ria has be.n
submitted by San Diego as part"f this
demonstration and i. disct1lsed brien,.
below. For a detailed discussion and .
anal~'sis or these submissions plea..
rerer to EPA's Technical Support
Document (TSD).
1. Exc:eedances
San Diego submitted dets conc.rning
the number of excaedances per year
from 1980 to 1992. Thi. data shows a
. clear downwud treod projecting zero
exceoclancn In 11199,
EP A Interprets this provision to
euthorize the Agency to make
corrections to e promulgation when it is
shown to EPA'. satisfection that: (1)
EP A emd In failing to consider or
Inappropriately considered Information
made evallable to EP A at the lime of the
promulgation. or the InformatloD made
evailable et the lime of promulgation is
subsequlntly demonatrated to heve been
clearly Inadequate: and (2) other
Information parsl.llsivelysupports a
change In the promuigltion.
EP A 'slnltial action In clasail)ing San
Diego wes bued on an ozone design
value of .190 ppm. That Information
WlslUbsequently demonstrated 10 have
been Incomct. and the lNe design
value was.185 ppm. Accordingly. In
today'a ection, EPA is comctlng this
enor by publishing the cnrrect design
value of .185 ppm ror San Diego.
Jf---/:<~
3m
FecIInl L; '0. I Vol. 80. No. 12 I Thursday. january 19. 1995 I Rules and Regulations
2. POUutlDD~
San Diego provided iDbmatlon
Nll8J'diDI \be mix of ~ ud air
pollUtaDb which obows that _d
motor ...hicll emiuioas... projected to
declinl through 1999 and beyond. and
that other aothropopnic amiuiOOl will
remaiD more or I... constant. BuecI 011
th_ prOjectiOIlS. motor vehicle
amiMions sbould 1101 undlrmille San
Diego's overall downward trends for
both short and Iollg term llIlis.ions.
3. Attainment Demonstration and
Transport
10 initial respollSes to requests for
raclluification und.. section 181(.)(4).
EP A required th.t an .... under
collSideration for a c1uaification
downwards s.how that it would .tt.in
the NAAQS by the earlier attainment
deadline. includillg transported
emissions &om upwind areas. However.
EP A has reclntly i.sued guidance th.t
allows attainmlnt date IxtellSions for
downwilld nonattainmellt ...as which
are overwhllmingly aaoeted DY
transported polluta<lts from
nonattainment are.. of higher
classifications. and which would
otherwiH attain the NAAQS for ozone
("Ozone Attainment Detes for A....
Mfoeted by Ovlrwhelmillg Trartlport".
Mary D. Nichol.. Auiatlnt
Administrator for Air and Radiation.
September 1. 1994). Uncler the new
policy. . downwind area must
demonstrate .ttainment of the NMQS
for locally generated ozonl episodes by
thl .tt.inment date specified by its new
cla..ification and demonstrate
.tt.inment under transport conditions
except for transported pollut.nts.
San Diego h.s provided. credible
preliminary showing that it meets the
requirements for demonstrating
atlainment by 1999 or locally generated
ozone .pisodes and under transport
conditions except for transported
pollutlnt.. This showing contained deta
showing overwhelming transport from
the Soulh Coast Air Basin. including a
d.tailed discussion of San Diego'S
tr~nsport .sseslment methodolosy. San
D.ego .110 submitted preliminary
document.tion of modeling being
prepared lor its November 15.1994
attaiDmaot d.....,.,_tion. San Diego
hu modalecl both a local and a transport
ozone opiaocle uaing thl UrhaI1 Alnhed
Modal (UAM). This preliminary
showing demonstratll that San Diego
will attain the ozone NMQS "but for"
transported amissions by 1999. For an
Inodepth discussion and analysis of San
Diego:s preliminary showing. refer to
EPA's technical suppon document.
4. Other F.ctors
Discontinuity: A 5.percent
cl.ssification downwards must not
result in an illogical or .xcessive
discontinuity rel.tive to surrounding
areas. In particular. in light of the area'
wide nature 01 ozone formation. a
classification downwards should not
cre.te a "donut hole" where an area of
one classification is surrounded by lreas
of higher classification. Th. San Diego
non.tt.inment .... is bordered by the
South Coast .ir district. .n "extrem."
ozone non.tt.inment are. which
trlnsports emissions to San Diego from
the north and w.st. and by the Imperial
County air district. which is a
"transitional" ozone nonattainment
area. A Ierious classification falls
between the classifications of the
surrounding .reas. and thus does not
constitute discontinuity.
5. Afloet on November 15. 1994
Attainment Demonstration
The Stlte must submit a full
attainment demonstration (including
transport) for San Diego on NO\'lmber
15.1994. as required by the Cllan Air
Act. This demonstration must be in
accord with all gener.lly applicable
requirements of Helion 110 of thl Act.
the requirements of section 182(c)(2)(A).
and the EPA policy memo "Ozone
Att.inment Dates for Areas ...ffected b,'
O,'erwhelming Tr.nspon" issued by .
Mary Nichols on Septemb<<r 1. 1994.
This SIP submission will be re\'iewed in
its entirety when submitted.
EPA's action today reclassifying San
Diego does not constitute Ippro\'81 of
the .ttainment demonstration which is
due on NO\'8mber 15. 1994. and EP."
does not by this action take. position
concerning the appro\'lbility of the
emission in\'entory. modelling. or
J<J/J,2p
control m~ relied upon ill the
preliminary attainment demonstration.
TocIly'1 Action
A. Final Action
In the Federalllegister of November
6.1991 (56 FR 56694). EPA issued.
linal rule promulgating lhl
designations. boundaries. .nd
classifications of ozone nonattainment
areas (and for nonattainment .reas for
othar pollutants not sddressed III this
lction). In today's acllon. [PA is
correctiDg Ita actIon. ,,'llh respect to the
publication of the .190 ppm ozone
design val.. for S.n Diego and
publishing the actual monItored ,'alue
of .185 ppm in accordance with seCHon
ttO(k){6).1n addition. [PA is
reclassifying San D.ego.s. serious
ozone nonaltainment area pursuant to
Helion 181(.)(4).
In accordance with c.\^ sections
107{d){2){B). 1t0{k)(6). 172{a)(I)(BJ, and
181(s)(3) and (a)(4). this documenlls a
final publication of lhe ozone deSIgn
value for San Diego .nd of the
reclassification of San Diego to a serious
ozone nonattainment area. and is nol
subject to the notice and comment
prO\'iSlOns of sections 553 throu~h 55:-
of Tille 5. '
List or Subjects in 40 CFR Plrt 81
Environmental protec1 lon, Air
pollution control. ~alionJ.1 p.3r...s.
Wilderness .reas.
Oat.d, December 13. "9.,
Carol_TOWIlI"
Administrator
Therefore. 40 CFR part 81 is J.nlt'::..:!t:.!
as follow",
PART 11-[AMENDED]
1. The authority catation for p:l:t K 1
continues to read as folio\\'<:
."uthori~':"~ L' 5C ~~Ol-~h.l'i
.Z. In S 81.305 the t.bl. for
"Califomia-Ozone" ic; amt'l:d~c.! b\
te't'ising the entry "San Dit'~.o .\rt:'"J ~ 1
read as follows:
.a'.305 eall1omla.
.
.
.
.
Federal lte8iRer I Vol. 50, No. 12 I Thursday, January 19, 1995 I Rules and Regulations
3773
".
~ .....
CAUFORHlA-OZONE
OesognlItiOn
Date'
Type
ClasSlficallOn
Date' Type
San Diego ArM
San Diego County...................................................
-.nainment .........................................
Senous.
'Tllos dalO os Nov_ 15, 1ll9O. _ __ nol8d.
.
.
.
.
IFR Doc. 95-131' Flied 1-11-9'; ':45 unl
...UNO COOl ~
FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS
COMMISSION
.7 CFR ...,,.0
IGN Docket No. 8W52, PA OocMI No, ....
553; FCC M-431J
Implam."atlon 01 SectIona 31n) end
332 01 tile Communlcllllona Act
AOINCT: Federal CommUllication.
Commission.
ACTION: Final Rule; Order on
reconsideration.
auMIIAIIT: Thi. Order on
Recon.iderslion in GN Docket No. 113-
252 and PR Dockel No. 89-553 I. I
partial recolllld.rstion of the Third
Repo" and Order in GN Docket No. 113-
252,1"CMRS Order"). In this
rscollliderstion. the Commission
decid.. not to .u.pend 8flllting of
s.condU\' .it. luthorlzation. for
incumbenlllOO MHz SpaclaUzed Mobil.
Radio ("SMR") syst.m.. "' originally
det.rmined in the CMRS Order. In the
CMRS Order. the Commi.s1on decided
nolto grant any furth.r secondary site
luthOrlzatiOIll. which would have
IlIowed .xisting 900 MHz SMR
operston 10 construct faci1Iti.. outsld.
of their Deslgnaled FIIiDa ANAl
("DFA.".. .nlbling them 10 .xpand
their ,vllem. or link faciliti.. In
diff.....nt markets. The C<---'-'oa had
rsasoned thaI. .ven thouah thate
secondary .11.. would not be III1tilled to
prolection from co-chlJ1Dllllnl.rf.reDCII
and IIIIY hav.,o discontinue operstion
ev.nlually. II would COD'a_lna'a the
900 MHz band 10 continu. 10 IiClllll8
secondary .11.. In advance of Major
Trsding Area ("MT A") licensing. On
reconsid.rstion, however, the
Commilslon concludes that such an
outrighl prohibltiOll on fllrther
secondary s1leliceDliDg im~ a
slgnlficanl burden on exialin& lIOO MHz
SMR Ilce_ that are bulJdina oul
th.lr .yst.m. and inlend to become
MT A licen..... which would al.o delav
the availability of service 10 custom.rs:
Also, the C'.ommlsslon .mpha.ize. that
secondary .ile operstors assum. the rI.k
of having 10 discontinu. OperstiOIll in
the avent of Inl.rference to an MT A-
liceDMd system. Thus. the Commission
will continu.'o process and granl
secondary .ite authorization. 10
quaUfied applicants.
FOIl FU_IlI1F01111AnoN CONTACT:
Amv J. Zoslov at (%0%) 418-0620.
WiNl_ Telecommunication. Bureau.
Commercial Radio Dlvi.lon.
auPPl._AIrt II_noN: Thi. ila
synopsis of the Commission Order on
Reconsiderstion In GN Docket No. 93-
252 and PR Docket No. 89-553. adopted
December 21. 11194, and rel.ased
December 22,11194. The fullt.Xl ofthi.
Ord.r on Reconsid.rstion I. available
for inspection and copying during
normal business hours in the FCC
R.ference Cenl.r (Room 239), 19111 M
Street, N.W.. Washington. D.C.. and may
alao be purchased from the
Comml.lon'. copy contractor.
InlemationaJ Transcription Service.,
(%0%) 857-3800. 2100 M Street, N.W..
Sulle.l40. Washington. D.C. %0037.
SJDOpsla or 0nI.. OD Rec:auiderallon
1. The Ord.r, taken on the
Commlaslon'. own motion. manes the
CommlasiOll" decision In the CMRS
Order. 511 F1t SlIM5 (111%11114). to
IUlpeDd fllrther granting of secondary
aile authortzations for 900 MHz SMR
systems pending the implemlll1teUon of
new service and liceaslnl rules for
those SMR systlllll.
2. By way of beckpoUlld. the
r~__l..\on adopted new licen.ing
rul.. for this service in the CMRS Order.
divldina 200 c1wmels InlO 20 blocke of
10 channels esch.1IIiD& MTAa u the
aervice __ for esch 1lcenae, and lIIing
competitive bidding selection for
mutually exclusive applications. The
incumbent system. abeady licensed in
the DFAa Iwhlch comspond to the lOp
50 lllljor marUtsl were 8fIIIdfathered.
'....live 1"ftJ'h.1'IIl".t iDtm'fereDC>>
prolectiOD for .........R facl1illa. bul
)9//;2 ?
w.... notlllowed 10 .xpand beyond
existing service areas unle~s they
obtained MT A lic.nses Some
incumbents bad been granted
authorizatioDl to construct facilities
outside their OF A. 10 expand their
.y.tem. or link facilities in different
markets. which became ....condar..
.11..:' i.... nol entitl.d to co.channel
interference protection. when the
Commission discontinued primary si:e
licen.ing in 1986. The CMRS Order
..tablished that any 900 MHz SMR
_ondary .it..licensad before ....ugus:
10. 1994, would be enlitled to primary
.it. prolection. 10 II to avoid
discontinuation of operation. for .uch
aile. thaI bad become inlegralto the
existing .yst.m.. In this COMeCllon. the
Commission decided nolto lic.nse an \'
furth.r secondary .i,..,o avoid .
conlamlnation of the 900 MHz band in
advance ofMTA licen.ing.
3. In this Order. the Commi..ion
conclud.. thet an outrighl prohibition
on further Iicen.ing of secondary sites
imposes a .igniflcanl burden on 900
MHz Incumbents who are building oul
syst.ms and who intend 10 becorr.e
MTA lice_. A .uspen.ion of
Iic.n.ing would d.lay se,,'ice to
consumers UIltil the new 900 MHz rules
are adopled and selection of lic.n.e.s
tak.. place. Also. II secondary .it.. .re
not entitled 10 inl.rf.rence protection.
and IlICODdary lile-hold.rs assum. the
rial< of discoDtinuation. the CommiSSIon
conclud.. thaI this policy will nol
contribule 10'pectrum contamination.
Thus. the Co,,,,,,i..100D will continue to
grant _dary slle authorization. to
qualified SMR applicants in the 900
MHz band. .ubject 10 strIct.nforcement
of the no-inlerference policy regarding
secondary operation, defin.d in 47 eFR
110.7.
LiII orSt.hJ....:~ 1a.7 CFR Part 90
A"''''hdatntive practice and
procedure. Radio.
/ 7 ~/~~
. '
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
REGULATION I. GENERAL PROVISIONS
RULE 1. TIlle I-I
2. Definitions I-I
3. Standard Conditions 1-5
4. Review of Rules 1-5
S. Authority to Arrest 1-5
REGULATION II. PERMITS
RULE 10. Pennits Req~
10.1 NSPS &. NESHAPS Requirements
11. Exemptions from Pennit Requirements
ILl NESHAPS Exemptions
14. Applications
IS. Pennit Process - Public Notifications
17. Cancellation of Applications
18. Action 011 Applications
19. Provision of Sampling and Testing Facilities
19.1 NSPS and NESHAPS Sampling and Testing
Facilities Requirements .
19.2 Continuous Emission Monitoring Requirements
19.3 Emission Information
20. Standards for Granting Pennits
20.1 New Source Review - General Provisions
20.2 New Source Review - Non-Major Stationary Sources
20.3 New Source Review - Major Stationary Sources and
PSD Stationary Sources
01/18/95 / )/--/;2 /
T ABLE OF CONTENTS
REG ULA TION II. PERMITS' - continued
Rl.TLE 20.4 New Source Review. Portable Emission Units
20.S Power Plants
20.6 Standards for Pennitto Operate
Air Quali ly Analysis
20.8 Special Offset Requirement Relating to Banking
20.9 New Source Review - Major Stationary Sources and
Provisions for Meeting the Federal Clean Air Act
RequiIemenlS
20.10 New Source Review. Portable Emission Units to be
Located at Federal Major Stationary Sources
21. Permit Conditions
22. Denial of Applications
23. Funher Information
24.
2S.
Applications Deemed Denied
Appeals
26.0 Banking. General
26.1 Emission Reductions Calculations
26.2 Standards for Grantinl Bankinl of Emission Reductions
26.3 Transfer of Banked Emission Reductions
26.4. District Banking
26.S Moratorium on Banked Emissions
26.6 Public Comments; Bankinl
26.7 Ownenhip of Banked Reductions
26.8 Use of Equipment; Bankinl
26.9 Limited Credits; Bankinl
26.10 ReJistry; Bankinl
27. Banking of Mobile Source Emission Reduction Credit
~ J'j-/}tJ
PAGE
:
(
TARLE OF CONTF.STS
- PAGE
REGt:LA nON III. FEES
R ti"LE 40. Permit Fees UI-l
Index of Fee Schedules UI-6
42. Hearing Board Fees UI-31
43. Fees for Acid Deposition Research rn-32
44. Technical Repons, Charges for UI-32
REGULATION IV.
RULE 50.
50.1
51.
52.
52.1
53.
53.1
53.2
54.
54.1
58.
59.
60.
61.0
61.1
61.2
PROHIBITIONS
Visible Emissions
NSPS & NESHAPS Visible Emissions Requirements
Nuisance '.
Particulate Matter
NSPS and NESHAPS Particulate Matter Requirements
Specific Contaminants
Scavenger Plants
NSPS and NESHAPS Specific Contaminants
Requirements
Dust and Fumes
NSPS and NESHAPS Dust and Fumes Requirements
Incinerator Burning
ConttOl of Waste Disposal Site Emissions
Circumvention
Definitions Pertaining to the Storage and Handling of
Organic Compounds .
Receiving and Storing Volatile Organic Compounds
at Bulk Plants and Bulk Terminals
Transfer of Volatile Organic Compounds into
Mobile Transpon Tanks
~/1-/3/
REGt:LATION IV.
R L l..E 61.3
61.4
61.5
61.6
61.7
61.8
62.
62.1
64.
66.
67.0
67.1
67.2
67.3
67.4
67.S
67.6
67.7
67.8
67.9
67.10
67.11
67.12
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PROHIBITIONS - continued
Transfer of Volatile Organic Compounds into
SllItionary Storage Tanks
Transfer of Volatile Organic Compounds into
Vehicle Fuel Tanks
Visible Emission Standards for Vapor Control Systems
NSPS Requirements for Storage of Volatile
Organic Compounds
Spillage and Leakage of Volatile Organic Compounds
Cenification Requirements for Vapor Control Equipment
Sulfur Content of Fuels
NSPS Requirements for Sulfur Content of Fuels
Reduction of Animal Matter
Organic Solvents
Architectural Coatings
Alternative Emission Conaol Plans
,
PAGE
(
Dry Qeaning Equipment Using ~troleum-Based Solvent
Coating of Metal Pans and Products
Metal Container, Metal Closure and Metal Coil Coating Operations
Paper, Film and Fabric Coating Operations
Solvent Qeaning Operations
Cutback and Emulsified Asphalts
Dry Cleaning Facilities Using Halogenated
Organic Solvents
Aerospace Coating Operations "
Kelp Processing and Bi~Polymer Manufacturing
Operations
Wood Product Coating Operations
Polyester Resin Operations
y /f~/J~
,
TABI.E OF CONTENTS
PAGE
REGULATION IV. PROHIBITIONS - continued
R lJLE 67.15 Pharmaceutical and Cosmetic ManufactUring Operations
67.16 Graphic Ans Operations
67.17 Storage of Materials Containing Volatile Organic Compounds
67.18 Marine Coating Operations
67.19 Coatings and Printing Inks Manufacturing Operations
67.22 Expandable Polystyrene Foam Products Manufacturing Operations
67.24 Bakery Ovens
68. Fuel-Burning Equipment - Oxides of NitrOgen
68.1 NSPS Requirements for Oxides of NitrOgen from
Fuel-Burning Equipment
69. Electrical Generating Steam Boilers. Replacement Units
and New Units
69.2 Industrial and Commercial Boilers. Process Heaters and
Steam Generators
69.3 Stationary Gas Turbines Engines
69.4 Stationary Internal Combustion Engines
70. Orchard Heaters
71. Abrasive Blasting
REGULATION V. PROCEDURES BEFORE THE HEARING BOARD
RULE 75. General
75.1 NSPS " NESHAPS Variance Procedures
97. Emergency Variance
98. Breakdown Conditions: Emergency Variance
V-I
V-I
V-I
V-2
/' /;//;5;J
,
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE -
REGUATION VI. BURNING CONTROL
Rl;LE 101. Definitions . VI-I
102. Open Fires. Western Section VI-2
103. Open Fires. Eastern Section VI.3
104. Funher Exceptions VI.3
10S. Burning Permits VI-4
106. Pennil Duration VI-4
107. Burning Hours VI-4
108. Burning Conditions VI-4
109. Temporary Suspension of Pennits VI-6
110. Additional Burning Limitations VI-6
111. Prior Notification VI-6
112. Burning Repon VI.6
REGULATION VII. VALIDITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE
RULE 140.
141.
Applicability
Effective Date
YD-l
YD-l
REGULATION VIII. SAN DIEGO AIR POLLUTION EMERGENCY PLAN
RULE 126. Applicability vm-l
127. Episode Crileria Levels vm-l
128. Episode Dec1aralion vm-2
129. Episode Termination Vm-2
130. Episode Actions vm-3
131. Stationary Source Curtailment Plan Vm.7
132. Traffic Abatement Plan vm-8
133. Schools vm-l0
/ /fJ~J31
,
TARtE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
REGl:LATION VIII. (continued)
RL'LE 134. Source Inspection Vm-lO
135. Air Monitoring Stations Vm-lO
136. Interdistrict and Interbasin Coordination vm-lO
137. Emergency Action Committee Vm-ll
138. Procedures and Plans Vm-ll
REGULATION IX. PUBLIC RECORDS
RULE 175. General IX-I
176. Infonnation Supplied to District IX-2
177. Inspection of Public Records IX-2
REGULATION X. STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW
STATIONARY SOURCES - Index X-i
SUBPART A. General Provisions A-X-I
(SUBPARTS B. C. F. G. &. H are RESERVED)
D. Standards of Performance for Fossil Fuel-Fired
Steam Generators
D-X-I
Da. Standards of Perfonnance for Electric Utility Steam Gene-
rating Units Constructed After September 18, 1978 Da-X-I
Db. Standards of Performance for Industrial-Cotiunercial-
Institutional Steam Generating Db- X-I
E. Standards of Performance for Incinerators E-X-I
I. Standards of Performance for Asphalt Concrete Plants I-X-I
]. Standards of Perfonnance for PetrOleum Refineries ]-X-I
K. Standards of Perfonnance for Storage Vessels for
Petroleum Liquids ConstnJct After June II, 1973
and Prior to May 19. 1978 K-X-I
~ //-/J->
,
TABLE OF C.OSTENTS
PAGE .
.
REGt:LATION X. . continued
Sl:BPART Ka. Standards of Perfonnance for Storage Vessels for
Petroleum Liquids ConstrUCtion after May 18. 1978 Ka-X-l
Kb. Standards of Performance for Volatile Organic Liquid
Storage Vessels (Including Petroleum Liquid Storage
Vessels) for Which Construction. Reconstruction. or
Modification Commenced after lu1y 23.1984 Kb-X-l
L. Standards of Performance for Secondary Lead Smelters L-X-I
M. Standards of Performance for Secondary Brass and
Bronze Ingot Production Plants M-X-l
O. Standards of Perfonnance for Sewage Treatment Plants O-X-I
DO. Standards of Perfonnance for Grain Elevators DD-X-I
EE. Standards of Perfonnance for Surface Coating
Metal Furniture EE-X-I
GG. Standards of Performance for Stationary Gas Turbines GG-X-l .
QQ. Standards of Performance for the Graphic Ans Industry:
Publication Rotogravure Printing QQ-X-l
RR. Standards of Perfonnance for Pressure Sensitive Tape
and Label Surface Coating Operations RR-X-l
SS. Standards of Performance for the Industrial Surface
Coating Large App1iances ss-X-l
TT. Standards of Performance for Metal Coil Surface Coating TT-X-I
BBB. Standards of Performance for the Rubber T1re Manu-
facturing Industry BBB-X-I
FFF. Standards of Performance for Flexible Vinyl and
Urethane Coating and Printing FFF-X-l
111. Standards of Performance for Petroleum Dry Cleaners 111-X-I
000. Standards of Performance for Nonmetallic Mineral
Processing Plants OOO-X-I
~ /9---/;>;"
,
REGliLATION XI.
SUBP \ RT A.
C.
D.
E.
F.
M.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR
HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS
(NESHAPS) - Index
General Provisions
National Emission Standard for Beryllium
National Emission Standard for Beryllium
Rocket Motor Firing
National Emission Standard for Mercury
National Emission Standard for Vinyl Chloride
National Emission Standard for Asbestos
REGULATION XII. TOXIC AIR CONTAMINANTS
RULE 1201. Hexavalent Chromium - Chrome Plating and
Chromic Acid Anodizing
1202. Hexavalent Chromium - Cooling Towers
1203. Ethylene Oxide Sterilizers and Aerators
1204. Surfacing Applications for Serpentine Materials Containing
Asbestos
PAGE
XI-i
A-XI. 1
C-XI-I
D-XI-l
E-XI-l
F.XI-l
M-XI-l
1205. Conttol of Dioxins Emissions from Medical Waste Incinerators
~J6-/J?
.
P:
,; :r;J .:<
~\ ff~~~
~...-..r'
..
.
. PI1JTIM CIfIIR II11II'
CDUIU If IAI IIEII
February 1995
New rule allows industry to bank
mobile emission reduction credits
Pollution Control District "bank" Industry can
withdraw or purchase these credits later to meet
state and federal Clean Air Act offset requirements.
The rule specifies five ways mobile source emis.
sion credits can be created, including:
. accelerating vehicle retirement (old car scrapping
program),
· purchasing low-emission
transit buses (primarily
compressed natural gas),
· purchasing zero-emission
(electric) vehicles,
. retrofitting cars and light-and-
medium-duty trucks to meet
low-emission standards, and
. retrofitting heavy-duty ve-
hicles to meet low-emission
standards.
Like a stationary source credit,
a mobile source credit becomes a
commodity the owner may use as
an offset or sell to another party.
Emission offsets must originate in
the San Diego air basin and be
real, quantifiable, enforceable and
not regulated by any other local,
state or federal policy.
The Air Pollution Control Board has approved a
new rule enabling industry to offset new or in-
creased emissions from stationary sources with
emission reductions from mobile sources.
Rule 27 allows emission reduction credits from
motor vehicles to be registered as "credits" in a Air
New equation for San Diego ...
'<:=",,"" "'!il.we::.:'WF ''''%)li'~~:=''':::~
~." 4ft
;;:'::'-*~i;..::.::::.
, .. -~.
Natural gas = less pollution + cleaner air
(story inside)
Workshop to discuss
small business assistance
A public workshop to discuss the Air Pollution Control District's
Small Business Assistance program will be held from 9 a.m. to 12 noon
Thursday, March 2, at the Al Bahr Temple, 5440 Kearny Mesa Road, San
Diego (behind the Hampton Inn).
The workshop is designed to obtain feedback from small businesses
on the program's current services and to discuss ways the 14-month-old
program can be improved.
The purpose of the Small Business Assistance Program is to help
businesses with less than 100 employees understand and comply with .
District rules and requirements and assist in the completion of permit
applications and variance petitions.
~
Air quality
.
Improves
(story inside)
/5- /;; T
Six straight years of improvement
San Diego County's air quality continued to
improve in 1994 for the sixth straight year.
According to preliminary data, smog ex-
ceeded the state clean air standard only 79 days
in 1994, exactly half of the 158 days of unhealth-
ful air recorded in 1989. The state standard was
exceeded on 90 days in 1993.
Federal clean air standards were
exceeded on nine days compared
to 55 days in 1989 and 14 days last
year.
Only one of the nine monitoring
stations measuring air quality in the
county - the mountain slopes station
at Alpine - exceeded the federal
standard for unhealthful air in 1994.
"This is the first time that just a
single station has exceeded federal air
quality standards since we began
monitoring air quality in 1955," said
Dianne Jacob, chairwoman of the Air
Pollution Control Board.
"The introduction of reformulated
gas this year and stricter requirements
for cars in 1996 will reduce automobile
emissions during the next five years, creating the
potential for the region to achieve the federal
clean air standard by 1999," Jacob said. "Meet-
ing tougher state standards will take several
years beyond the year 2000."
Motor vehicles are responsible for about 64
percent of San Diego's smog-forming emissions.
El Nino - the warmer water temperatures in
the Pacific Ocean that affect weather patterns -
played a minimal role in the improved air
quality this year.
Clean air standards are set by both the state
and federal governments to provide an ad-
equate margin of safety in protecting public
Number of Days Exceeding State Standards
175
150
125
100
75
50
25
o
Number of Days Exceeding Federal Standards
75
55
50
27
25
19 14
o
1985198619871988198919901991199219931994
/
1985198619871988198919901991199219931994
health. California's standards are stricter than those
used nationwide. The state clean air standard for
ozone is 9 parts per hundred million (pphm) or 75
on the Pollutant Standards Index (PSI). The federal
standard is 12 pphm or 100 PSI.
Only one health advisory was issued in the
county last year in Alpine. A health advisory is
issued when smog levels reach 15 pphm (138 PSI),
and the public is advised to reduce vigorous outdoor
activity.
San Diego County has not had a Stage 1 smog
episode since 1991. A Stage 1 episode occurs when
smog levels reach 20 pphm or 200 PSI.
Additionally, this was the fourth straight year
that the county did not exceed the state standard for
carbon monoxide. State standards were also met for
nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and lead, but not
for ozone or inhalable particulates.
Except for ozone, San Diego met federal clean air
standards for all other criteria pollutants: carbon mon-
oxide, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, inhalable par-
ticulates, and lead.
~ Modeling shows county
. can clean up air by 1999
The Air Pollution Control
District recently submitted a
revision to the State Implementa-
tion Plan (SIP) demonstrating that
San Diego County will be able to
attain the federal ozone standard
by 1999.
Using the Urban Airshed
Model, the District demonstrated
that the county can meet the 1999
attainment deadline for serious
Wilson appoints
Roberts to ARB
Ron Roberts, vice chairman of
the San Diego Air Pollution Control
Board, has been appointed to the
California State Air Resources .
Board by Governor Pete Wilson.
Roberts is a newly elected
supervisor for the County of San
Diego. The Board of Supervisors
is the Air Pollution Control Board
for the San Diego air basin.
Program gets
old clunkers
off the road
More than 800 old cars have
been retired as part of San Diego
Environmental Exchange's old-car
buyback and scrapping program.
By getting these cars off the road,
smog-forming emissions have
been reduced more than 70,000
pounds a year.
The program received $700,000
in vehicle registration funds
allocated by the Air Pollution
Control Board to purchase up to
1,000 pre-1982 vehicles.
areas. The modeling showed that
local emissions will not cause
ozone concentrations exceeding
the federal standard, and that even
considering transported ozone and
precursor emissions from the
South Coast Air Basin (Los Ange-
les area), the ozone standard can
still be attained.
The modeling indicates the
maximum predicted ozone con-
centration for 1999 is 11.1 pphm
from local emissions and 11.6
pphm from transport. The federal
standard is 12 pphm.
The 1990 Federal Clean Air Act
Amendments required SIP revi-
sions be submitted to the Environ-
mental Protection Agency in 1992,
1993 and 1994.
District now
accepts
credit cards
The Air Pollution Control
District now accepts VISA and
MasterCard.
An area is now
provided on District
invoices for persons
wishing to use this method of
II payment. VISA and
. MasterCard can be
used as payment by
giving complete credit
card information to the District by
mail, over the phone, or over-the-
counter.
For more information about
this new service, contact the
District's Permit Processing
Section at 694-3307.
VIM I
Fi rst 4 'clean ai rl buses
to repl-ace di rty diesels
The first four of 87 natural gas
buses have been purchased by the
Metropolitan Transit Development
Board (MTDB).
MTDB was awarded $1.9
million from vehicle registration
funds by the Air Pollution Control
Board towards the purchase of the
natural-gas buses to replace old
. diesel buses.
Natural gas buses have signifi-
cantly less particulate emissions
than diesel buses. They also
produce 50 percent less ozone-
forming pollutants and 90 percent
less carbon monoxide than buses
using gasoline.
Each bus will seat 40 passen-
gers and is wheelchair accessible.
Their engines are the highest
/c;-l'-ltP
horsepower and torque certified
natural gas bus engines on the
market today.
The natural gas buses will be
used throughout San Diego
Transit's entire service area.
'Thank you!
Solar Turbines is another
business who has contributed .
to the District's Total Quality
Management (TQM) progrllJI'
Their video services depan
ment videotaped the Customer
Service training sessions.
Southern California gets cleaner gas
Cleaner gasoline is now being
sold in Southern California. A
newly reformulated gasoline has
replaced conventional gasoline at
service stations throughout the
Los Angeles, Ventura, and San
Diego air basins as of January 1.
San Diego meets
CO standard
The California Air Resources
Board has redesignated San Diego
County as being in attainment of
the state 8-hour carbon monoxide
ambient air quality standard.
The county has not violated
the state carbon monoxide stan-
dard since 1990.
Required as part of the Federal
Clean Air Act of 1990, it provides
the single, biggest immediate
reduction in emissions since the
smog check
program. The new
. gasoline will
reduce smog-
forming emissions
15 percent during
the summer smog
season.
The new gas
lowers the toxic
emissions of
gasoline by 15 percent (with a
maximum of 1 per cent benzene by
volume), lowers aromatics by 25
percent, and increases the oxygen
content.
.
,
.
The oxygenate used can be
MTBE (Methyl Tertiary Butyl
Ether), ETBE (Ethyl Tertiary Butyl
Ether), or Ethanol. The oxygen
content is essentially the same as
California's winterized gas that
will now be sold year-round.
The state has also adopted
regulations that call for gas sold in
California to be even cleaner as of
June 1996. This will result in an
additional 13 percent reduction in
smog-forming emissions.
.
Notice
If you received more than one
copy of this newsletter or wish
to be taken off the mailing list,
please call (619) 694-3332.
Air Pollution Control District
County of San Diego
9150 Chesapeake Drive
San Diego, CA 92123
Air Pollution Control Board
Dianne Jacob, Chairwoman
Ron Roberts, Vice-Chairman
Greg Cox
Pam Slater
Bill Horn
o PRINTED ON RECYCLED PAPER
/9~/(/
BULK RATE
u. S. POSTAGE
PAID
. SAN DIEGO, CALIF.
PERMIT NO. 571
APPENDIX D
/9//f~
DRAFT
-PROPOSED DRAFT REVISED THRESHOLD STANDARD.
AIR QUALITY
GOAL:
To maintain and improve the ambient air quality enjoyed by the citizens of Chula Vista.
OBJECTIVE:
Recognizing that air quality is an issue which eaRRet ~e effesti':ely !l@~~~il.!I addressed
~y Cllyla Vista, !}tml~~l!!j~II9'qn@I@!,!q!!:!9~1~@~~~i the City shall @1!~~,~rf9 implement
tl:le taGti~~___~.~~~~~~.~.~.~.~,.,.!.~_..~~~__. ~.~.~~~.A.~Iy'.__~.~.~~~~~ ..I3.~~.i~~.~~ ..t~.it..~.~.~.~.i.o/....~~~~~~~.~~.~e Pia A
(I'.QM.P)..~PP!!~BI!i!@!t9g~liW.I~~~91~V@lSi~~~!lPPI9'~i.iffji~!t!~tiq~@~~~p
tlf.................t8bllStiedth..........htiitldpled.er...IAitQ1lW_fWSXAQi}.......rid
II~i~~!~~~.~~.~1Ili.'1111.1.~qtll~g!!~\!!.L:y~
THRESHOLD:
The ~ ~MQ!#, shall aRRyally e provide~ tile SaR gielle ".PCg 'Nitll a 12 te 18 R'leFltll
aevelepme'i:lffe"ree8st BAd FeEtl:iest 8R evah:JatiaA af its impaEit SR 6YFFeAt BAd futYFe air
Elwality FRaF13gemeRt pregr3FRE, sleRg witt:l FeseRt air ElY31it,p' Glata. Tt:le gFS':J.t1:1 terse8t! 3Ad
!>.~S.~. ~~.S.~.~.~6~__.I.~~~r& &1:1811 be pFs':iEileel Ie tl:l8 GMOC fer iAS)ysisA iR it6 Fe':is'J:. Ig:~:lp:
@P!U!@I!;@Pf;j~Mf~i9Pl
~
-
J<j~)t/3
IMPLEMENTATION. MEASURE:
DRAFT
Should the GMOC determine that a potentially serious problem exists with respect to iny
9~~.~~i~9Ri air quality !mP!PR..g!~Jf9~@!@!I~f!li@~I!!m1.i9!li!ltM@lilrPRI,..it
may adopt a formal "Statement of Concern" within its annual report. Such a "Statement"
requires the City Council to consider the adoption of a resolution reflecting that concern
during the public hearing on the GMOC's reporti~qA~~q~ltlptlti~~jjnUi!li~p t&
be directed to ~ Iny!:l~h~t responsible publicagency(j~)withfollowi.iptoassure
appropriate responsebythatagencYQP~)> ...... ...
(3/14/95)
(A:\GMOC-Il4\AQ-THSRV.STD)
/9--/1/'/
APPENDIX E
)1//.:/5
"
DATE:
January 13, 1995
TO:
Growth Management Oversight Committee
FROM:
Ed Batchelder, Senior Planner ~J?
David J. Palmer, Library Director~~J
VIA:
SUBJECT:
Annual Threshold Compliance Review
SUMMARY:
SOUARE FOOTAGE (7/1/93 - 6/30/94)
civic Center Library
365 F Street
TOTAL
55,000 sq. ft.
10,000 sq. ft.
1,720 sq. ft.
609 sq. ft.
67,329 sq. ft.
EastLake Library
1120 EastLake Parkway
Castle ParkjOtay Library
Woodlawn Park Library
POPULATION OF CHULA VISTA
June 30, 1994
150,252
THRESHOLD STANDARD
Population Ratio: 500 square feet (gross) of library
facility adequately equipped and staffed per 1,000
population
THRESHOLD SOUARE FOOTAGE NEEDED AT 500 SOUARE FEET PER 1.000
150,252 population x .500
75,126 sq. ft.
THRESHOLD SOUARE FOOTAGE SHORTAGE AS OF JUNE 30. 1994
1994
7,797 sq. ft.
DISCUSSION:
During this review period, July 1, 1993 through June 30, 1994, the
Library did not meet the threshold of 500 square feet of adequately
equipped and staffed library facility perti,OOO population.
However, in December 1993 construction began n a 37,000 square
foot community library located at 389 Ora e Avenue, in the
MontgomeryjOtay Planning Area. This project, which will open to
the pUblic at the end of March 1995, implement a component of the
I
/9~J1f !
Librarv Master Plan and is partially funded by a $6,747,528 Library
Renovation and Construction Bond Act grant administered by the
California state Library. This award provides 65% of the
construction and other eligible costs only. The remaining
$8,697,000 needed for the project is funded primarily by Community
Development Block Grant funds and Library Development Impact Fees.
The Library will provide complete information and reader's services
to adults, young adults and children. The facility will have room
for 178,000 books and audio visual materials and will include a
public access computer lab, meeting rooms, a coffee bar/bookstore,
and exhibition/gallery space. In addition, the library will also
become the new home of the Chula vista Literacy Team.
with the opening of the South Chula vista Library, the small Castle
Park/otay and Woodlawn Park Libraries will close. This will bring
the total library square footage (at civic Center, South Chula
vista and EastLake Libraries) to 102,000, ensuring that the Library
will be in compliance with its Growth Management Threshold. The
Library will continue to be in compliance through the year 2000,
based upon a projected population of 167,775 (83,888 square feet
required) .
The Library continues to propose that preliminary work begin in FY
1996-97 on a 29,000 square foot library to be built at the corner
of H Street and Paseo Ranchero (Sweetwater/Bonita Planning Area).
This facility will also implement a component of the Librarv Master
.P.l.an. Under this proposed schedule, the building would be
completed in FY 1998-99. However, since this project will be
funded by Library Development Impact Fees, it.is very likely that
this project will be delayed until adequate fees are collected to
cover the estimated $9.5 million needed to construct, furnish and
equip the facility.
As requested by the Growth Management Oversight Committee, the
Library continues to explore all possible grant opportunities for
the joint-use library on the EastLake High School campus. Also,
Library staff and the Library Board of Trustees will, during the
next two years, be examining the effects of new technologies on the
size of future libraries and how new technologies might impact the
Library threshold.
CONCLUSION:
At the conclusion of the FY 1993-94 review period, The Library was
7,797 square feet short of meeting the Growth Management Threshold
However, the opening of the 37,000 square foot Library at 4th and
Orange Avenues, in the spring of 1995, will bring the City into
compliance with the Library Threshold on a cumulative basis:
1994 Library Square Footage 67,329 sq. ft.
1995 South Chula Vista Library 37,000 sq. ft
1995 Castle Park/Otay and Woodlawn
Park Libraries Close (2,329) sq. ft
TOTAL: 102,000 sq. ft.
J9-Jtll
APPENDIX F
/9---11 g/
- I (., ~ -I,'
f..-I"'''' ,-.t
f;.
MEMORANDU~
. (
,
January 27, 1995
File No. KY-043
KY -057
c..
,
TO: '8ob Leiter, Director of Planning
FROM: Cliff Swanson, Deputy Public Works Director/City Engine~
SUBJECT: Chula Vista Compliance with the Threshold Standards for Sewers and
Drainage
In accordance with the provisions of the City's Growth Management Program, we are
providing the following report regarding sewer and drainage threshold standards.
Sewer
No significant instances of established thresholds for sanitary sewers being exceeded
as a result of new growth in the City occurred during 1994. City design standards for
sewers limit the flow in sewers up to 12" in diameter to 50% full and to 75% full for
sewers larger than 12". The City has also allowed flow up to 75% full in 8", 10" and
12" diameter sewers if it has been shown that ultimate development has already
occurred.
Willdan Associates completed the Telegraph Canyon Sewer Basin Improvement and
Financing Plan in 1992. This plan estimated existing and ultimate sewage flows,
recommended necessary improvements to the sewerage system, and determined fees
to create funding for these improvements. The City Council approved the plan in
October, 1992 and established a Sewer Development Impact Fee of $184 per
Equivalent Dwelling Unit for new construction in the Telegraph Canyon Sewer Basin.
This fee will pay the proportionate share of the cost of upgrading the sewer system to
handle the sewage generated by new developments which flows into the Telegraph
Canyon sewer basin. An amended plan incorporating pumped flows from EastLake
and Salt Creek Ranch Developments not within the basin and additional projected flows
from the Kaiser Hospital and Medical Center was completed in June, 1993. City
Council approved the amended plan and established a fee of $560 per Equivalent
Dwelling Unit for flows pumped from out-of-basin developments in March 1994.
The Proctor Valley Road Sewer was constructed in 1992 to serve the Salt Creek I, Salt
Creek Ranch, Rancho San Miguel, and Bonita Meadows developments, as well as
other adjacent parcels. This line is connected to the County's Frisbie Trunk Sewer.
A Trunk Sewer Usage Agreement is currently being prepared for the use of capacity
within that line by the City.
A sewer analysis was completed by Wilson Engineering in November 1994 for the Salt
/1- / if
Creek Sewer Basin. The planned Salt Creek interceptor will serve Salt Creek Ranch,
Eastlake, and Otay Ranch developments. Recommended improvements and a
financing plan were approved by City Council in November 1994. A sewer
development impact fee of $284 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit will be payable by all new
development in this basin beginning in February, 1995.
The City is using several methods to identify and determine the cause of peak flows
exceeding City standards in existing sewers:
1. Several problem sites have been identified through our flow monitoring program.
A parallel sewer in Palm Canyon is presently under construction as a result of
this monitoring. The Engineering Division acquired additional portable monitoring
equipment during FY 1995 to improve metering accuracy and expand the
metering program. The expanded program of monitoring sewer segments where
flow is near capacity has been started.
2. The City's sewer TV inspection crew continues to monitor suspected problem
sites in order to determine whether the condition of the sewer lines has affected
the flow. Phase V of the sewer rehabilitation program which provided for the
lining of 1 ,510 lineal feet and replacement of 440 lineal feet of sewer mains was
completed in 1994. An additional 84,444 linear feet of sewer lines were
televised during 1994 for Phases VI and VII of the Sewer Rehabilitation
Program. Contracts for rehabilitation projects providing for the lining of 911
lineal feet and replacement of 150 lineal feet of sewer mains in Phase VI are
included in the CIP for FY 95-96. Television inspection of the sewer lines will
continue in 1995. .
3. The August 1990 Wastewater Master Plan prepared by Engineering-Science
includes an analysis of current and projected future flows for all City trunk lines
and provides recommendations for construction of new and upgraded sewers
and preliminary cost estimates. As indicated above, the City's monitoring and TV
inspection programs are used to keep the Master Plan information current.
4. Environmental documents prepared for proposed new developments must
address the adequacy of existing sewers to serve the needs of those
developments. Remedial actions are required where necessary to accommodate
flows added by the developments.
Sites identified through these methods may be considered for inclusion in the Capital
Improvement Program or the Sewer Rehabilitation Program. New developments are
required to pay a proportionate share of the estimated cost of building new sewers
needed to serve their projects.
San Dieao MetroDolltan Sewer Authority
/9~/~!J
-3-
January 27, 1995
The Average Daily Flow (ADF) of wastewater into the Metro Sewage System during the
first half of FY 1994-95 was approximately 12.048 million gallons per day (mgd). This
included 9.264 mgd of metered flows discharged directly to the Metro sewer line and
2.784 mgd of metered and non-metered flows discharged through the Spring Valley
Sewer outfall.
Seven new permanent wastewater metering stations which measure flows to the Spring
Valley Outfall Sewer are in operation. A new metering station is also in operation on
"F" Street West of Bay Boulevard.
The City's existing sewage capacity reservation (including Montgomery) with Metro is
19.2 mgd. The Engineering Science Master Plan contained a curve of projected
wastewater flows based on historic data. According to this curve, the City would reach
the 19.2 MGD by the year 2000. However, the Average Daily Flow obtained in the last
three years has not followed this curve. The flows have decreased as a result of water
conservation measures and a slower pace of new construction. Our estimate of the
flow discharged to the Spring Valley Sanitation District decreased due to the use of
actual metering results instead of an Equivalent Dwelling Unit count. Our current
estimates indicate that the City flow will reach the capacity reservation with Metro by
2010.
The San Diego Area Wastewater Management District (SDAWMD) took effect on
January 1, 1993. The SDAWMD board included representatives from most Metro
agencies and was to manage construction and operation of Metro and Clean Water
Program sewage transportation and treatment facilities. In order to keep treatment
options open and maintain the best possible bargaining position with respect to the City
of San Diego, Chula Vista decided to withdraw from the SDAWMD without penalty in
June, 1994. Since the City of San Diego also subsequently withdrew from the
SDAWMD, it is unclear whether San Diego or another entity will ultimately have
responsibility for the Clean Water Program facilities. Chula Vista has retained a team
of technical, financial, and legal consultants to develop a long-term sewage treatment
'policy.
The City's projection of growth during 1995 has not yet become available.
Consequently, we have not yet requested verification from Metro that adequate capacity
in that system will be available to serve that growth. Based upon our recent history and
the amount of remaining unused capacity in the Metro system we believe that the city
has more than adequate capacity for the next several years. However, capacity rights
may not be treated in the same manner under the SDAWMD as they have been under
the Metro system. Discussions are ongoing in this regard to assure that adequate
capacity will be available regardless of the entity the City deals with.
A proposed 6 mgd Otay Valley Water Reclamation Plant was originally included as part
)9//5/
-4-
January 27, 1995
of the Clean Water Program with a proposed start-up date of 1998. The City of San
Diego subsequently decided to indefinitely postpone work on all water reclamation
plants in the Clean Water Program other than the North County facility and the South
Bay Water Reclamation Facility to be located next to the Intemational Treatment Plant.
Various options for financing, constructing and operating an Otay Valley plant are being
considered, but no decisions have yet been made.
Drainaae
No major problems can be attributed to new growth in the City during calendar year
1994. One reason for this is that developers have constructed detention basins so that
downstream flows are not increased. Each new subdivision is required to construct all
drainage facilities to handle storms of a 10 to 100 year magnitude, depending on the
type of facility and size of drainage basin. In 1993 and 1994, building permits for
approximately 444 and 1160 dwelling units, respectively, were issued in the City,
primarily in the Eastem Territories.
Developers are also required to dedicate land and to construct drainage facilities
necessary to serve their proposed developments. Drainage facilities benefitting an
extensive area with multiple owners may be financed through the establishment of
assessment districts.
Ordinance No. 2384 established a fee of $3,922/acre for new development in the
Telegraph Canyon Creek Drainage Basin to fund improvements in Telegraph Canyon
Creek east and west of Interstate-805. The improvements east of Interstate-805 have
been completed, leaving only the segment of the channel between Hilltop Park and
Fourth Avenue unimproved. The improvement of this segment of Telegraph Canyon
Creek will be funded primarily by fees collected as provided by Ordinance 2384 as
development within the Otay Ranch occurs
During the first half of FY 1993-94, interim improvements in the segment of Telegraph
Canyon Creek between Hilltop Park and Fourth Avenue were completed. This interim
work consisted of guniting the most critically eroded sections of the Creek at an
approximate cost of $70,000. Installation of ultimate improvements within this segment
is scheduled to be accomplished in a period of five to ten years based on available
funding from the Telegraph Canyon Creek Drainage Basin Fee. Additional interim
facilities may be required during this time.
A number of drainage projects were recently completed as planned for in the City's
Capital Improvement Program. In Fiscal Years 1991-92, 1992-93 and 1993-94, five
drainage improvement projects were completed at an approximate cost of $1,300,000.
These projects were:
/9---/.>;2
-5-
January 27, 1995
In Sierra Way between Broadway and Colorado,
In Oxford Street between Second Avenue and Del Mar Avenue,
Guatay Channel north of Naples St, Hilltop Drive to 770 feet east,
In Crested Butte Street between Broadway and Welton Street,
Telegraph Canyon Channel Repair, east of Paseo Del Rey.
Construction of a major project in the lower section of the Central Drainage Basin west
of Broadway and south of "G" Street has also been completed at an estimated City cost
of $1,500,000. An additional drainage facility, a 66 inch pipe, was included in a
reconstruction project for Broadway from "L" Street to Naples Street. This drain runs
from Telegraph Canyon Channel southerly to Et point midway between Naples Street
and Moss Street, and will help in the alleviation of flooding in the vicinity of Woodlawn
Avenue and Moss Street. The cost of this drainage work is approximately $200,000.
It should be noted that none of these projects were needed for the correction of
conditions created by new development. A list of future drainage projects proposed for
the CIP is enclosed as Exhibit "A".
In January 1993, runoff resulting from a series of long duration, relatively high intensity
rain storms caused erosion, siltation, and damage (including the loss of a County
crossing of the Otay River) along the City's major rivers and creeks (i.e., Otay River,
Sweetwater River, Telegraph Canyon Creek, Long Canyon Creek). Repair of the
damaged facilities has been completed, with funding partially by federal disaster funds.
Little flooding, erosion, siltation, or damage was reported along the City's smaller
drainageways.
In general, the City experienced fewer drainage problems and flooding in 1993 and
1994 than in 1992.- This is because the long duration storms of January 1993 primarily
impacted the larger, regional drainage facilities, but minimally impacted the smaller,
local drainage facilities. As stated above, nonEI of these problems are related to new
growth or development within the City. The pmblems were created by the unusually
long period of rainfall, which produced saturation of the banks of the streams, rendering
them subject to erosion. The eroded material from the banks then was deposited as
siltation at locations where the water velocity sh)wed to the extent that the water could
no longer transport the material. The constructitm of new drainage facilities by the City
and by private developers in 1992, 1993 and 1994 have reduced the potential for future
flooding and flooding hazards in both the newer and older areas of the City of Chula
Vista.
In addition to the construction of drainage facilities, developers must obtain National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Construction Activity permit coverage
for each grading operation that disturbs an area of five acres or more, or is part of a
common plan of development or sale totalling fi~e acres or more. This permit program
/9//.5)
-6-
January 27, 1995
requires a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). This plan is specifically
developed for each construction site in order to prevent pollutants, including silt, from
reaching drainageways.
The NPDES Construction Activity permit is issued by the State Water Resources
Control Board (SWRCB) and is administered and enforced by the Regional Water
Quality Control Board (RWQCB). The City does not administer or enforce any of the
NPDES Construction Activity permit provisions or regulations. The City is, however,
required to ensure that all pertinent provisions of the City's Grading Ordinance relating
to drainageways, erosion and siltation control are enforced.
Reduced copies of maps showing the outlines of all the sewer and storm drainage
basins within the City's Sphere of Influence are enclosed for attachment to copies of
the report provided to GMOC members.
cc: John Lippitt, Director of Public Works
Jf~)5'f
EXHIBIT "A"
SUMMARY OF UNFUNDED NEEDS
DRAINAGE PROJECfS
Priority I PnpoHd. New Appraprlatlons
- PnJed Title Cesl F.sUmale\ FY 951'6 FY96197 FY97191 FY 98199 FY99/OO Comments
NfA IUK-lZI; K<,..lnr... """""FlCUDD<' '''',"''''1 526,000 '" '" SO SO I Desip aDO collltrucbOn IUIlCIJD&. ICneamea lor
IOno_ A....... 7SO' U""';" FY 95J96. Eroeion Control Proirct
IA DR-90S; DraiUF 1mp1'OYelDeD1I- "0" Stlftt, $200,000 S260,OOO $0 $0 $0 SO Desip aad colllb'UCtioO CundiD& illCheduled for
SecoDd Avenue wlo Del Mar Avenue FY 95196. ThiI project W3II nol peD a priority rntiDc
because it waI DOt previouIly incIentified . . draiDa&e
deficiency in the 1964 Fo" Report.. However. improvement
of Ibil tqment of the Central Baain Ch.uaDel mla' occur
in coDjuDetion with DR.I20.
IB DR-t20; CallnllJniDo&e _~.. $265,000 5225,000 $0 $0 $0 SO Desizn aDd collltnlCtion fundia& ill IclleduIed for
"Ir Street aacI SecoDd Avenue FY 95196. Partial (uDdin!. of S40,OOO for deli... in FY93194.
2 Hilltop Driw.. T to WhitDey Streell' HiDlop 5<<0,000 5<<0,000 $0 $0 $0 SO 0eIip. and cobtltruc::tion (uncIin& illCheduIed (or FY 95196.
IJrive. SIO "IT S1ftet 10 Shalla Street
3 11aird Avenue &. Emenon Saul to 1.200 5200,000 $100,000 5100,000 $0 $0 $0 ~.f~in& illCbeduled for FY 95196 aDd co..t:ruction
Feet Weal ru . (ot FY 96197.
4A GIenhaven Way, Pint Avenue 10 CbanDeI 5175,000 $0 SI15,OOO $0 50 $0
4B Tom. Drive 10 Mai8 Chalmel $140,000 $0 $140,000 $0 $0 $0
'- 4C HID DiloD Way, Betweea Tobiai Or.' 0rImd0 sm.loo $0 S277,I00 $0 $0 $0 Desip aad roDItrUctioa fundin& is acheduIed for FY 96(97.
~ Court and Fint Ave.' 0Ie0bIvea. Way (DR-92S) Propoetd for CODItructioO. a poup project.
40 Tobia. DriwCIIIvert $50,000 $0 S50,000 $0 $0 $0
~ 4E C.......c...mc _Napleo 51.... S330,OOO $0 S33O,000 $0 SO $0
O}eabaven W"'f (Dixoa Dr.. Oxford SL, aDd
~ 0......... W~l.
5A IJraina&e Impro.LmeatI - 100 F~t South of S16O,000 $0 $0 S16O,000 $0 $0
Oxford Street 10 ICftmed:y Stlftt Deaip. aad coastruction fUDdiDc it ICbrdaIed for FY ty/19S.
5B DniDace <:::baImel- Chford Sl to 100 Fl South $35,000 $0 $0 $35,000 $0 $0 PropoRd for ~tructioD.. poup project
SC ntl. OIford St CbanDeI $155,000 $0 SO SI55,OOO $0 $0
6A Drainaze Channel - HoDiatel' SL, Main Strtet 1485,000 $0 $0 $435,000 $0 $0 Design fundinz: it ICbeduled for FY 97193 aod co..tnIctioD
..0Uy....... fUlldin& in FY 91199. Propoeed for COftlb'UctionM.
6B IJraina&e 1......"MlIKall. Maia S1Ret. S360,000 $0 $0 5237,000 S123,OOO SO poup projecL
IoHollilterStreet
7 DR-909; J...... _ - Hi\Itop Drive.. Tobia $%8,000 $0 $0 $0 _,000 SO Oftip md co..tnlctio. f1lDllin& it KhedWed. for FY 93199.
I DR-90S; Nortb -., -.. r..... $465,000 $0 $0 SO $465,000 $0 DeGp.... _1iOJJ r......,,;. odJeduIed r", py 9<199.
Suttlll.alef River to Smidr. Avenue Carriedowr from. ~CIh
9 Fifth Awuut. Westby Street 10 KeDDedy Street S105,OOO $0 $0 $0 SI6,OOO $&9,000 Desip fUlllliaJ illICbeduled for Py 98199.00. COIIItnlcOO.ll.
r........r"'py..lOO. .
10 ..... A...... 0Uy V....,........ 0Uy S4OO.000 $0 $0 $0 $0 S4OO,ooo Desip. aDd COIIItnICtioD fundia& it tcbedWed for FY 99100.
Illior
17 Draiuce IlIlpI'O'IHlfttl. FintAWIlae, Mwny S380,OOO $0 $0 $0 $0 S3lIO,ooo Desip md coaIttUction fUDdin, it tcbedukd for FY 99/00.
Street 10 South of "H"Street Carrird OYer from Drt'VioaI CIPa.
10 DR.931; DniDace Improvements- Oxford SL, 5204,:500 $0 $0 $0 $0 S204,5OO Desip utd. construction fundiDC it ttbeduJed for
bdweeII Fint.net Seoond. Avenues py 99/00. Carried over from Drevio.. C1h
lUfAUl 55,400,600 51,071,000 St,072,100 51,072,000 51,on,OOO SI,073,5OO
- .
'I : Is" III f[ II' (I. ~t. il ..
il ~ i~ ~ I t ~ 8 ~ f f "!! ~ 18 ~ J
. .till Hit f!il. n~ l!' B II i
'" ~ -~JJ f f . If' . ~
~ f!f r. I'''l '1.. . lli I( . j .
~ f 8 1~1"ii' f'. .
8 ." I . fl8 j =~
~!
I
5
~ . i
~ . .~
i \II
.
~...__..-
OTAY RANCH SPHERE
2
312195
.
The combination of the desiI~detention fidIity, erosion control measures ancIalllllllll'eI
&om the City contribu1ins to Ce:ntraI Creek, results in little to DO impact to the SUllllylide Basin
problems.
2. DrIiDIse problems occurred in this ma Wore J:.etlake VSaIt Creek I developmellts were
CODStr\Icted. .A local Civil Engineer (Mr. lImeS A1gen), who has been in the area for many
)'IIl"S, has studied the situation IDd indicated that the main problem in the ma can be
. 8tIributed to the dwmel beina too Bat to cmy lows of'lqeutorms (over a 5-10 )'ell'
ttonn). AD of the L.....O........lU wbich exist today 110171 CeIIlrII Avarue were constructed by
deYeIopments within the jDisdictiOll af'the County.
pRAINAGE ISS~ONITARO~ j nWROAD
Durina recent )'IIl"S, the drIirIage iyItem fknWla tom tile eat toward the Sweetwater River bas
deposited silt on the eat lide of Bonita Road near the Good Shepherd CIurcb IDd ~. Store.
Some af'the silt was pnerated by RancIlo Del Rey SPA D deYIIopmeut. McMiDin Devel.........4 bas
constI uctecl a desiI1ingldeteation ticiIity to eliminate In)' iDcrase in silt . a result ortbeir project.
1bat fidIity was completed in 1993. The ticiIity was desipd to retain tile silt tom the project ancI
nduce the l()().yur nmoffto that wbicb occurred prior to development.
The City DOW removes the silt II the outlet oCtile dninIp CIIIYert that c:roaes Baaita RoId DeIf the
BoriIa Sten after "- ewr IIOnD. 11Iere haw bleD DO draiDap problema tIis)'lll' ill driI toc.hon.
pRAINAGE IMPACTS AT WIT J OW !ImZ~ AND S\\<~ I wATER. RtYEB
Two)'llll 110, when the t.\')' nina reu. driI ma WII ;"........... due to... talion .t)..q down
~....u af'the bridge wbicb .......... tile water to bide up IDd silt to be deposited each time t.vicr nins
occmred. The City, tbrouah 1 pDt tom 1be FecIenl &.....51...y Manasemart ~ (FEMA), wiD
lie I'IIDOYiDa mme ortlle wplIdaa and IIIDIt oCtile silt u IIIowed by tile Filii and Game.
Some af'the ~ 011 both IideI orthe aolf' COUIIll haw periodiCllly bleD _-A..... by 1be
Jarser ItormI aICh. those which occurred ill 1980, 1983 and 1993. The CeIIlrII AVIIIUe a_oj of
die SweetMhr River ofteD loods with lIIIIDer hqumcy ItClIms. PiccureI."-ltted by Mr. WIlIOIl
Ihow ~ of'lbe CIuIa Villa GoIfCoune UDder water. SiDce the aoIf'COUIIll II iD the SweetWater
River 1oocfMry,It II DOt .... .......,... to _ the ma ;".-A.....
ANNEXA'I10N ~ud 1I'n ..ATED '10 SEWER SERVICE
Two Icaen .... read Iato the pL.....:.. 0. ...... -..ton ncad tom Fmeiro ani! Luisa Nieto aad
ManIla IDd Pednl Pndo who I'IIide _pectiwIy II 4348 and 435. ~...,.;. A\'IIIJe ill BOIlIta. Both
litters refer to the City ofClula Villa requirina IIII' .B1XI pior to eou.iCCtiOll to 1 City II'MI' line. III
addition, 1he Pndo Ieucr iMim. that they Ire nquire4 to.-Y over S7,OOO fbr that (- -..-wn. .
When Bonita 1.0171 CarryoD aabdivision was developed. the developer was required to instID III'MI'
line ill Acacia Avenue to serve the developmem. Tbe cxi~ properties aloDl Ae-";~. which were
. ~c /9 -/5?
OT AY RANCH SPHERE
3
31219S
.
developed in the County, were On septic I)'ItemS. Some of'tboIe I)'ItemS bave aabsequattly &iJed and
1he OWIICI'S were required to "O'1IIeCt to a sewer by the HaJth Depanment. .
The IeWa" to which these p....- ties CID CO..ua.l is a city 0MIed and....n...m...f sewer I)'Ilem. Under
cumat City Policy 570.02 adopted on JUDe 2, 1992, the 0WDer is required to do ODe aCthe ronowina:
'IF CAPAB~ TO ANNJ;:X TO 1HE CITY {Contil!lJoUs to ~ mdm:}
The CIOIUleCtee must first ana to the City ClfClula Villa orftia.. aD a._...- .4C111I1f1en_4.
Ifan aneution "'llebl is IIh1l'ed. the ..........ct. is required to cIcposil with the City an
amOUDt equal to three times the CIII1'Cm ~ CIpacity dla.jo;; to be UIId to purdwe the riabt
to use City IeI'Yic:es in the event that a.".... ~l'lII ,houJd ti 1be OMIII' is also required to pay
the capacity chqe in addition to the c:IIqe to pun:bue the riabt to .0....", L 1be amm
dIarp is $2,220; 1b...4ore, the .o.....ACC. is required to pi)' sa,l80 plus all)' ather COllI
u~.ted with the ccmnection IlICb u IateraJ ;,,_nMlon COllI. Upaa 1It."'lI1iclJl, 56,660 is
mumed to CIOIIMc:tee. If .a........ .':on fiiIJ, the City may cIIim the depoIil u pa,1IlIlIIt b the .
risht to eou.-.l to UIiIize City ...... TotII up fhxI COlt Clfdais ";""';l1li would <<II [wd
110.000.
IF tJNAB~ TO ANtiEXTO 1HE q:rv (NllIWlO.dill'.....to ~
The 0MIeI' IbID... iato an .~- ..diaD andDitfl" -;:cioa ~~"wIdI the City. III
additicm, 1he 0MIeI' IbaJI pi)' the CIII1'Cm City ClfClula Villa..... ~~ dIarp and a _ d
twice the ammt NMII' 0'Ip...Jty cbarae wbich is ~"Cl iato the City 0eIIlnJ FUDd. 0Iber
ClOIU ..,...;--c with COJI'IICticm to the City sewer IIIIIt be paid by the OMIII' u:b . the
sewer latenl.,...n.~1III COllI. 1be OMIII'is aIIo required to depoIlt wIIb the City oaHIaJfthe
...n..1l1ec!M.". .f~tees. Tlisdepolitwillbel'ltUnlld.......!_A I~.~et' TIle
total up tom COIl fbr dais JI'CIC*Ln wauJd be mare tban 17.000.
ID .~'XI to obtaiDizw a .-ulIl tom the City. the 0MIel1111U1t '**... IIpJlI'CMl lam LAPCO beIbre
Ibe City CID aDow ~.-tJiClD.
Both the Nietos and the Pradoa are ......,......11 to Ibe City ...........,.. A...,.-. OMIII' (Sarda). who
.. al*d to 0..... -ct to the Oty ...... is IcJ.. ..,... . 4375 -,_..:. AWlIIIto YttidI is CIIl the IIClfth iide
of Acada Awaue. That Jlfopertj is IIDI ~'':lUI to the City ....~ and cauJd IIDI_. this
. lime.
A ....WJIOIId poticy c:baIlp is ameady beiDa ~~. a nUt Clfthe -'-0:'1 A..- .......w. Ita&'
IIu _ wodciDa with LAFCO and the Sprina VaDey hRltMloa DiaIrict (SVSD) CIIl the ..~
poJicycbqe. Once LAFCO and SVSDhave"'jI.vrildthejll~dt&~ltd'willtmathe
item to the City 0-......1 fbr 1IppRMl. .
. f~ ;r-t
19-/.pgY
OTAY RANCH SPHERE
4
3/2195
.
INFRASTRUCIlJRE ISSUES
Mr. Stan Waid Ind Mr. MichaelJ. Roark made comments relating to infiutruc:ture It the February
22,1995 Planning Commission meeting. Mr. Waid's COIIlIJIelI1 related to approval ofOtayRanch
without 1""1"" infiutruc:ture Ind Mr. Roark'I concern was related toratrictinS development in
r:..tl,ke until there was llIOnh/1ClUth c:orridor (SR-I2.5 or equivIIent). FoDowins ill response to
each ltItanent:
JNFRASTRUC'IURE REOUlREMENI'S
L..... v._....nt IIId sradina plans Ire reviewecllIId ~.ed It the finI1 map ltI8e. Thole pIIIIS Ire
pepared to meet City ".nlfllJ'ds IIId to comply ~ applicable ccmditioaa ofapprovalllld
eIl'YUOI'--' concerns. In addiucm, IODIe impact fees Ire paid It that time. Other impact fees Ire
paid It iasulnce ofbuildins .... u"r. aach u IChool, Residential CoIIItnx:tion Tax, 1'raDIponmioD IIId
PlIb1ic Facility DeYelopmentlmpact and IeweI' CIpICity fees. .
Adequate iDfi'aslnIcture iI required to be provided with aD devdopment within the City ofCll.11a Villa
piorto oc:aIplllC)' of'lb'UClUres throush the COIIItNCtion of the ia&utruc2ure or pymeat of'fees. If
. 8dequate iDfi'aslnIcture is DOt available u required by the City'1 Jf'OWIh ~.-4 tbr-hnl.;l..the
City CIIIItOp dew:lopmeat UIItiIthe inadequac:iel1I'e . ......died. .
( . ,l'lORTHlSOU'IH TRANSlQRTA'I1ON CORRIDOR
''Jbere bas been 110 speci5c City (h-a Policy Yotich I'IItricIed deYelOJIIuall ill r:...tT .Ir_ beyoDd the
. &It phue until I JIOfthIIClUth roadway was ill pIIce. Tbe City lid have the Growth Manapment
. TbresboId Stllldarda which were ill placeat thetimelbat r:..T .Ir-I_.... [lIIed Thole .......'1fs
would have..meted deYIlI~ if'thr-Mlds bad belli - -led
Tbe ~,....;1 has adopted I SR-l2.5 ~L,....e.4 TT<:t lie to ___the IIIed for I 6c::iIitywitbiD
die SR-l2.5 corridor. Tbe fee was IStIbIilbed u .-r,p'M'lIto pvvide .&c:iIityif'thetclllroad was
DOt CIClIISIJUCted.
~
.~ J9-/S}
... ._ .. _II II "'., II n_'__"
.'
.
-
/9-/~~
'-J~
APPENDIX G
/1-/;' /
INTERDEPARTMENTAL CORRESPONDENCE
DATE:
March 2, 1995
TO:
VIA:
FROM:
SUBJECT:
The purpose of this report is to update the Growth Management Oversight Commission (GMOC)
regarding the general fiscal status of the City of Chula Vista and to provide specific data related
to Development Impact Fees (DIF).
FISCAL STATUS
Like all local governmental agencies in California, Chula Vista is doing its best to balance the
City's needs in light of the prolonged recession, the State's balancing its budget on the backs of
local governments, and the increased service needs of a growing city.
For FY93-94 the City Council's goals continued to be: 1) maintain existing service levels to the
general public; 2) maintain General Fund reserves; and 3) not layoff any City employees.
While the City was able to maintain service levels and not layoff employees, the unaudited
General Fund balance decreased approximately $1 million during the fiscal year. A brief
summary of the 1993-94 General Fund activity is included in Attachment 1.
Most revenue categories showed modest increases during FY93-94, reflecting the continued
growth in Chula Vista and the slight improvement in the economy. Overall General Fund
revenues increased $2,420,857 (a 5.4% increase). Sales tax revenue for FY93-94 was
$11,917,631 compared to $11,473,867 in FY92-93. Franchise and utility users taxes increased
$351,046. Licenses and permits went up $$776,065, from $893,905 to $1,669,970. The major
exception was property tax, where revenues went from $8,587,048 to $7,859,456, a decrease
of 8.5 %, due to the on-going state shift in property tax from cities to schools. This property
tax shift from local governments to schools is phased in over three years. For Chula Vista, this
means a permanent on-going loss of $2,193,000 in property tax when the phase-in is complete
in FY94-95. Attachment 2 details the loss of revenue to th~ City of Chula Vista pursuant to
action by the Stale of California. It is unclear at this time how the actions of the current
Legislature will affect local governments.
On the expenditure side, FY93-94 expenditures of $55,719,332 were 9.9% higher than the
FY92-93 expenditures of $50,714,011. The major areas of increased expenditure were for the
addition of 5 police officers for patrol and 2 police officers for the school resource program;
/9-/?/}--
FISCAL OVERVIEW
-2-
March 2, 1995
budgeting for full-year staffing of Fire Station 6; operation of the joint library at EastLake High
School and gearing up for operating the South Chula Vista Library in FY94-95; and increased
staffing of more afterschool recreation programs.
With the expenditure increase outpacing the revenue increase, it was necessary again to use
significant one-time revenues to fund on-going operations. The use of one-time revenues was
the subject of a recommendation in last year's GMOC report and will be covered in a separate
response being prepared by the City Manager's office.
An unknown area for the current fiscal year and beyond is the effect on the Chula Vista
economy from the economic problems of Mexico. Although the City's sales tax revenues are
certain to suffer from Mexico's problems, the magnitude of the impact will not be determinable
for several months.
The turnaround in the economy that we were glimpsing as last year's GMOC report was
submitted has continued at a moderate pace and appears that it will continue. State revenues
have out-paced projections, lessening the threat of further diversions of local money.
DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEB
The purpo$e of the City's DIF programs are to identify public facilities and improvements
required to support future development within the City of Chula Vista's general planning area.
Where an additional facility need is created by future development, the cost associated with the
new need is apportioned to future development in the form of a development impact fee.
In many instances, the construction of a particular facility is triggered when development reaches
a certain number of units or level of traffic generation. If development slows down, then the
need for the facility is delayed. If development accelerates, then it also accelerates the need for
facilities. In some instances, developers advance fund and construct facilities and are given
credit against payment of future development impact fees.
The City of Chula Vista has several types of Development Impact Fees which were assessed
during the fiscal year ended June 30, 1994. The major categories ofDIFs are for transportation,
traffic signal, park, drainage, sewer and public facilities.
Attachment 3 are the DIF Financial Reports that indicate the revenue and expenditure activity
of each DIF Fund for FY 1993-94 and the Fund Balance in each as of June 30, 1994.
TRANSPORTATION DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE - This fee was adopted by the City
to finance and coordinate the construction of new transportation facilities so that streets are built
when needed. This fee is applicable to all new development east of I-80S. Prior to the
program, streets were built by developers in a fragmented fashion with 6-lane facilities, necking
down to 2-lanes and expanding back to 6 lanes again. In addition, there was a fairness issue
since some developers fronted on large streets and others did not. Now all developers in the
Eastern portion of Chula Vista pay the same fee per dwelling unit and either the City constructs
the street or a developer does, using the cost to offset the TransDIF fee at the building permit
/9-/~J
FISCAL OVERVIEW
-3-
March 2, 1995
stage. For FY93-94 the fee was $3,060 per equivalent dwelling unit (EDU). The current list
of projects to be completed under the Transportation DIF is contained in Attachment 4.
The major expenditures from the Transportation DIF was for street improvements for the
Rancho Del Rey Commercial Center ($210,000), Otay Valley Road Widening ($280,000) and
Otay Lakes Road Widening ($171,000).
During FY94-95, the Interim SRI25 DIF was adopted with the fee effective January I, 1995.
Some of the projects formerly in the Transportation DIF have been folded into the Interim
SR125 DIF. This topic will be addressed more fully in the FY94-95 update.
TRAFFIC SIGNAL FEE - This fee was adopted to provide for the projected traffic signal
needs for the City that result from increases in traffic volume caused by development. As funds
are accumulated they are expended on traffic signal projects that meet the warrants at the time
the funds are available. This is a city-wide fee with a FY93-94 rate of $13 per trip generated.
Projects funded or installed during FY93-94 include traffic signals at Third and Anita, East
Orange and Lorna Lane, Telegraph Canyon Road and Paseo Ladera, Otay Lakes Road and
Gotham, 1-805 and Otay Valley Road.
EASTLAKE PARK DEVEWPMENT IMPACT FEE - This fee was adopted by the City to
finance and coordinate the construction of new parks in the Eastlake I area which also
encompasses the north half of EastJake Greens. The $742,959 from fees collected prior to
FY89-90 are for the construction of facilities, i.e. concrete slab, within the EastJake Greens
Community Park pursuant to the agreement approved by Resolution No. 15225. This agreement
is currently being re-evaluated. The City is also in the process of reviewing and updating the
original Eastlake Park, Eastlake II and Eastlake III agreements.
TELEGRAPH CANYON DRAINAGE DIF - This fee is applicable to all new development
within the Telegraph Canyon Drainage Basin. The FY93-94 fee was $3,922 per acre and pays
for the construction of the Telegraph Canyon channel between Paseo Ladera and the Eastlake
Business Center and a portion of the channel west of 1-805.
The major expenditures in FY93-94 were for the drainage portions of the Otay Lakes Road
Widening ($163,000) and the Telegraph Canyon Design ($25,000).
TELEGRAPH CANYON GRAVITY SEWER DIF - This is a fee for the expansion of the
trunk sewer within the basin for tributary properties. The FY93-94 fee was $184 per EDD.
This is a new DIF with no scheduled projects in FY93-94.
TELEGRAPH CANYON PUMPED SEWER DIF - This is a new fee effective May 14, 1994
per ordinance 2582 (Attachment 5-A)' It is collected for the expansion of the Telegraph Canyon
trunk sewer to serve those properties outside of the basin. These flows are pumped into the
trunk line temporarily and may ultimately drain to another basin, either Poggi or Salt Creek, by
gravity. If Telegraph Canyon basin becomes built out, there may be no reserve capacity for the
temporary pumped flows and a parallel system must be built. If,however, the capacity is never
/9-)j1
FISCAL OVERVIEW
-4-
March 2, 1995
exceeded once the gravity basin is built out and no parallel system is built because of the
temporary flows, the funds will be returned to the current property owners. There is enough
capacity in the existing line for three years, however the line will be monitored with flow meters
to anticipate when additional facilities are needed. Phase Al through A6 (Attachment 5-B) may
occur in the 5 to 7 year timeframe depending on growth in the area. The FY93-94 fee was $560
per EDU. In lieu of paying the fee a developer may offer a letter of credit.
PUBLIC FACILITIFS DIF - The Public Facilities DIF is a city-wide fee with several
components levied to fund that portion of public facilities projects attributable to new
development. The components, estimated project costs and status are contained in Attachment
~. Prior to July 1993, the separate fee components collected for the different public facilities
were placed in separate funds. Funds from one facility component fund could not be used to
finance projects of another facility component, regardless of the need for, or timing of the
various projects. Loans were made from other City funds for project components with
insuffIcient cash. Under the current ordinance, fees collected after July 1993 for the separate
fee components are consolidated in a single fund rather than in separate facility funds. Thus,
the funds are available for whichever approved project is currently scheduled and interfund loans
are minimized. Because of the fund consolidation, the Public Facilities DIF Fund was able to
repay the General Fund $1,400,000 of the DIF cost for the Police Facility remodeling. For
FY93-94 the total fee for all components was $2,150 per EDU.
The components of the Public Facilities DIF with the associated fee are as follows:
ADMINISTRATION ($79) - Administration of the Public Facilities DIF program,
overseeing of expenditures and revenues collected, preparation of updates, calculation of
costs, etc. This fee is set at 2 % of the other Public Facilities DIFs charged.
CIVIC CENTER EXPANSION ($527) - Expansion of the Civic Center per the Civic
Center Master Plan prepared in 1989, to provide suffIcient building space and parking
for the existing and anticipated staff and the public.
The major expenditure in FY93-94 ($275,000) was for property acquisition for expansion
of Civic Center parking.
POLICE FACILITY ($235) - Accommodation of the building space needs per the Civic
Center Master Plan, which included upgrading of the communications center,
construction of a new crime lab, offIce improvements and installation of new
communication consoles. Also included is the purchase and installation of a new
computer aided dispatch system (CAD), a new Records Management System, and new
Mobile Digital Terminals.
During FY93-94, the major item was the repayment to the General Fund of $1 ,400,000
as mentioned above. Expenditures also included the costs associated with adding new
police offIcers because of the growth of the city ($95,000) and the Computer Aided
Dispatch project ($16,000).
)9-/~~
FISCAL OVERVIEW
-5-
March 2, 1995
CORPORATION YARD RELOCATION ($515) - Relocation of the City's existing
corporation yard from the bayfront area to a site more centrally located and of a larger
size. The existing site is near capacity.
The major expenditure in FY93-94 was for the telephone system upgrade for the
Corporation Yard ($24,000).
LmRARIES ($544) - Improvements include construction of the South Chula Vista
library and Eastern Territories library(ies), and installation of a new automated library
system.
Expenditures in FY93-94 were the automated library system ($54,000) and the new South
Chula Vista Library ($28,000).
FIRE SUPPRESSION SYSTEM ($141) - Projects include the relocation of Fire Station
#4 & #3, construction of a fire training tower and classroom, purchase of a brush rig,
expansion of Fire Station #1, installation of a radio communications tower and
construction of an interim-and permanent Station #6.
Expenditure from this fund was for the EastLake Interim Fire Station ($68,000).
GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEM ($49) - Purchase and installation of a GIS
system for mapping of various base maps and creation of geo-data files to aid in planning
and processing of land developments.
This project is a multiyear installation project with FY93-94 expenses of $305,000.
During FY93-94 the major hardware and software components were installed.
MAINFRAME COMPUTER ($23) - Purchase and installation of a new mainframe
computer and various enhancements to meet existing and future needs for additional
memory and storage space and enhanced processing speed.
Payments for equipment upgrade for FY93-94 were $105,000.
TELEPHONE SYSTEM UPGRADE ($32) - Upgrading and expansion of the City's
existing telephone system to accommodate growth, including installation of new conduit,
wiring additional telephone lines, and a voice processing system.
In FY93-94, a $12,000 advance from the Sewer Fund was repaid.
RECORDS MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ($5) - Updating and modernization of the
existing records system to prepare the City for anticipated increases in transactions and
volumes of records.
J<j-)J,rf,
FISCAL OVERVIEW
-6-
March 2, 1995
FIVE YEAR PROJECTION
The Growth Management Oversight Commission recommended that the annual fiscal review for
each of the DIFs be expanded to include a 5-year projection of needs/revenues, based on the
Planning Department's 5-7 year growth forecast.
Timing of construction of DIF projects is very dependent on the growth patterns and pace of
development. Many of the DIF projects are needed by the development and are constructed by
developers as a condition of development. As part of the City's Capital Improvement Program
(CIP) budget process, all capital projects to be constructed by the City, including those funded
by DIF funds, are reviewed each year for a five year time span, culminating with formal
appropriation of the next fiscal year's CIP budget. The Finance Department, in conjunction with
Administration and the departments administering the DIF funds, provides the revenue estimates
on which the five year plan is based. While the program looks at a five year horizon, most
effort is concentrated on the next fiscal year. Actual scheduling of projects depends on growth
achieved and availability of funds. Attachment 7 contains the CIP Program Detail for the DIF
funded projects in the FY94-95 CIP. Each year this program is updated based on new revenue
and growth figures.
Besides the CIP process, planning for future projects, including estimates of revenues available,
projected needs and estimated growth, varies with the type of DIF. Sewer related DIFs are very
specific projects where the need for the facilities are triggered when a certain volume of sewer
flow is reached as a result of growth. The flows are monitored in certain key locations to give
sufficient lead time to include the project in the CIP program. No additional information is
needed in the DIF updates to further define the needs/revenues.
The Telegraph Canyon Drainage DIF is a single project that is currently in the design phase.
The project will be phased in when funds are available. Growth rate does not affect timing
significantly on this project since each development is required to have detention facilities that
reduce peak flow to that which occurred prior to development. Thus, the facility won't be
needed until funds have been collected.
The Interim SR125 DIF included projections of when the interim facilities would be needed.
It also indicated that bond issues would be required to finance the projects, because the projects
are bigger and more regional in nature and not appropriate for one developer to handle. If the
Interim SR125 facilities are needed, the projects will become CIPs in the 1998-2000 time frame.
The scheduling for the Transportation DIF is contained in the Transportation Phasing Plan
(fPP), which is updated periodically. "The Engineering Division of Public Works is constantly
monitoring traffic volumes and development to assure that the schedule is still on target. The
TDIF roads, with a couple of minor exceptions, will be done by the developers themselves as
a condition of development, and thus, not part of the CIP process. For traffic signals, City
policy is not to install signals too far in advance of when needed. Signals needed for
developments are required to be installed by developers. For other City signals, timing of signal
installation is based on the results of traffic counts and other factors calculated into the signal
warrants. There is a one to two year time frame from signal identification to completed
) r; -~ ?
FISCAL OVERVIEW
-7-
March 2, 1995
installation. Trying to predict farther in advance is counter productive because of the changing
nature of traffic patterns. i.e. Signals that are part way down the priority listing and would be
scheduled in the later years may be superseded in priority as traffic patterns change.
Engineering feels the current mechanisms in place for the transportation related DIF updates,
TPP update, development conditions and CIP process provide sufficient coordinated information
for the five-year horizon.
The Public Facilities DIF differs from the other DIFs since it is a City-wide DIF with non-DIF
fund participation for many of the projects. The DIF identifies the projects, estimates the costs,
calculates the fees, and provides a status of the projects. It does not specifically say when or
if funds are available. One previous impediment to availability of PFDIF funds was removed
during the 1993 update when funds for all the elements were pooled into one fund. Thus, a
particular project does not need to wait for all the funds to be collected for that element before
the project can be funded. This gives more flexibility to staging the projects. The GIS,
mainframe computer, telephone and records management system projects are all underway and
near completion. Most of the individual projects within the Fire and Library DIF elements will
be constructed or items purchased when certain developments come on-line. Projects such as
the Corporation Yard Relocation and Civic Center Expansion do not easily lend themselves to
standards that trigger the need for the facility. However, there is a need to plan for the projects.
As further refinement of the five-year projections, future annual Public Facilities DIF updates,
where possible, will include a more formalized scheduling program including projection of
needs/revenues as suggested by the Growth Management Oversight Commission.
Attachment I
Attachment 2
Attachment 3
#3-A
#3-B
Attachment 4
Attachment 5
#5-A
#5-B
Attachment 6
Attachment 7
1IDC:\\lICn\suaanc'lamoc94a.mem.
General Fund Summary for FY93-94
Loss of Revenue to Chula Vista Pursuant to Actions by the State of
California
Development Impact Fee Financial Reports for FY93-94
Public Facilities DIF
Other DIFs
Transportation DIF Capital Improvement Projects List, Estimated Cost
and Status
Telegraph Canyon Pumped Sewer DIF
Ordinance 2582
Sewer Segments and Costs for Pumping Improvements Only
Public Facilities DIF Projects, Estimated Costs and Status
CIP Program Detail for DIF Funded Projects in the FY94-95 CIP Budget
If /Ji-Y
GENERAL FUND SUMMARY
AVAILABLE FUND BALANCE AS OF JUNE 30. 1994
Beginning Balance 7/01/93
1993-94 Revenues
Transfers-In
Transfers-Out
Expenditures 1993-94
Net Increase/Decrease in Reserves
Prior Year Adjustment to Fund Ba1ance-Acctg Change
Available Fund Balance 6/30/94
(diroctor\pf...........J
/9//~ '1
ATTACHMENT #1
$ 7,915,929
47,363,271
6,780,504
(2,886,404)
(55,719,332)
916,310
2.547.738
$ 6.918.016
ATTACHMENT #1
ATTACHMENT #2
LOSS OF REVENUE TO CHULA VISTA
PURSUANT TO ACTIONS
BY STATE OF CALIFORNIA
ITEM
1992-93
1993-94
1994-95
Est.
1. Public Library Funding $ 100,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000
2. Area Agency on Aging 20,000 20,000 20,000
3. SB 2557 Booking Fees 332,000 332,000 320,000
4. County Property Tax Admin Fees 180,000 160,000 170,000
5. Peace Officer Standards &
Training Reimbursement 30,000 30,000 30,000
6. Fines & Forfeitures 300,000 300,000 300,000
~ cigarette Tax 228,000 228,000 228,000
8. special Supp Subventions & Redev. 500,000
9. 9% Property Tax Shift to Schools 800,000 2,060,000 2,193,000
10. Property Tax Per capita Reduction 234,000
1I. Trailer Coach & Mobilehome
License Fees 50,000 50,000 50,000
12. Reduction in Redevelopment 652,000 233,000 233,000
Property Taxes (ERAF)
TOTALS $3,426,000 $3,513,000 $3,644,000
{memotl\dim:Ior\revloll.doc 1
)l'-J?tJ
ATTACHMENT #2
CITT OF CHULA VISTA PUBLIC FACILITIES DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE FT 93-94
PUBLIC FACILITIES DIF PRIOR TO FISCAL TEAR 1993-94
GENL ADMIN
801
CIVIC
CENTER
802
Ea======:z a======:.a
(1)
POLICE
FACILITT
803
CORP TARD
RELOCATN
804
1I8RARIES
805
FIRE
SUPP STS
806
GEOGRAPNIC
INFO STS
807
MAINFRAME
COMPUTER
808
21-Feb-95
TELEPHONE RECORDS
SUITCH MANAGEMENT
809 810
03:58 PM
a:z=====:_ a=======:= ========== =======a:_ ..=======_ ...=====:_ =====.a.== ==========
TOTAL
8EGINNING 8ALANCE 07/01193 ($75,670) $1,738,956 $236,992
DIF REVENUES 0 0 0
INVESTMENTS EARNINGS 0 94,165 6,750
EXPEND ITURES (1,339) (303,189) (19,439)
TRANSFERS IN(OUT) 77,009 D (19,182)(2)
REPA TMENT OF ADVANCE 0 0 0
RESERVE FOR ENCUMBRANCES 0 0 0
~---_._--- ---------- ----------
8AL PERIOO ENDING 06/30/94 SO $1,529,932 $205,121
..._z====: ---------- =========11:
----------
PUBLIC FACILITIES DIF FISCAL TEAR 1993-94 FUND 850(3)
"- CIVIC
GENL ADMIN CENTER
~ 3909 3910
, 8501 8502
.......... aaa:_==_.. ...=======
~ 8EGINNING 8ALANCE 07/01/93 0 0
DIF REVENUES $102,743 5683,041
INVESTMENTS EARNINGS (951) 17,440
EXPEND ITURES (62,981) 0
TRANSFERS IN(OUT) (77,009) 0
---------- --------....
BAL PERIOO ENDING 06/30/94 ($38,198) $700,480
====ZIIZ==- _c:=======
>
-l
-l
>
n
:x:
3:
fT1
:z
-l
""
W
I
>
NOTES:
=========:
POll CE
FACILITY
3911
8503
======a..
o
$306,212
o
(94,562)
(1,380,818)(2)
($1,169,168)
==z====c:z
1850,902 $511,653
0 0
47,752 27,704
(33,072) (81,638)
0 0
0 0
0 0
$377,299
300
19,432
(70,185)
o
o
o
$46,472 ($43,921) ($120,461) ($16,924) $3,505,298
o
318
(156,612)
109,821
o
o
o
o
(6,793)
50,714
o
o
o
o
(36)
132,529
(12,032)
o
o
o
(138)
17,062
o
o
300
196,121
(672,441)
367,953
(12,032)
o
--..-..----- --------.... ..----.......- ---------- ---------- ---......---.. --.----..-- ----------
1865,581 $457,719 $326,846
SO
SO
========== -=======:= ========== ========== c.======== c.======== ==========
SO
CORP TARO
RELOCATN
3912
8504
1I8RARI ES
3913
8505
FIRE
SUPP STS
3914
8506
GEOGRAPHIC
INFO STS
3915
8507
MAINFRAME
COMPUTER
3916
8508
TELEPHONE RECOROS
SUITCH MANAGEMENT
3919 3920
8509 8510
$0 $3,385,200
----------
----------
TOTAL
a========= ========== ========== ========== ========== c======... ========== ==========
5667,011
17,030
o
o
o
o
$703,733
17,968
o
o
o
$117,058
2,989
o
o
o
562,233
o
(148,764)
(109,821)
$30,086
o
(98,454)
(50,714)
o
$41,387
(2,420)
<3,647)
(132,529)
o
o
SO
56,543 $2,720,047
(269) 51,787
o (408,408)
(17,062) (1,767,953)
~...~~.~~- ........-- .......... .......... ..-.-..... ..._-..... ......---- ...._---..
$684,041 $721,700 $120,046 ($196,351) ($119,082) ($97,209) ($10,787) $595,472
a====:==== ====:=::== =c=======. ac======== ========== ...======= ==========
(1) This fund includes the eoount set-aside for the acquisition of the Adamo property, 459 F Street.
Fund 820 was established for this purpose. It has a balance of $594,101.46 at FY 93-94 year-end.
(2) This represents the transfer to the General Fund for the reMOdeling of the Police Facilities.
(3) In fiscal year 1993-94, a new fund (Fund 850) combining all the Public Facilities DIF In
one fund was establtshed. In this flnt, a revenue accotrlt was set.up for each Public Facfl ities
OIF, and individual divisions for expenditures.
----------
----------
>
-l
-l
>
n
:x:
;;:
rT1
:z
-I
""
W
I
>
'-
~
\
'-.......
'0
~
Fund
Beginning Balance 7/1/93
DIF Revenues
Investment Earnings
ExpendRures
Transfers In (Out)
Repayment of Advance
ReselVe for Encumbrances
Balance Period Ending 6/30/94
CITY OF CHULA VISTA DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEES FOR FY 1993-94
TEL CANYON TEL CANYON
TRAFFIC EASTLAKE GRAVITY PUMPED
TRANSPORTATION SIGNAL PARK DRAINAGE SEWER SEWER
621 211 621 628 627 629
$4,075,910 $109,520 $702,205 $147,641 $8,573 $0
1,594,143 693,308 307,293 25,944 12,880
250,347 111,986 40,754 20,573 1,200 38
(968,992) (188,658) (17)
(236,600) (278,000) 236,600
(105,632)
------- ------ --------
$4,609,176 $636,814 $742,959 $523,449 $35,700 $12,918
------------ -------- -------- -------- --------- ---------
------------ -------- -------- -------- --------- ---------
21-Feb-95
:to :to
-t -t
-t -t
:to :to
n n
:J: :J:
3: 3:
,.,., ,.,.,
:z :z
-t -t
"'" "'"
w W
I I
"" ""
ATTACHMENT #4-1
TABLE 1
TRANSPORTATION DIF
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Revised
DIF Street Location Cost al of Slatus as of June 30, 1994
July, 1992
State Route 125 Nnrth Son Miguel to Telegraph Canyon Road SO Will be transferred to SR-I25
DIF/CFD
State Rnute 125 South Telegraph Canyon Road to East Orange 0 Will be transferred to SR-I25
Avenue D1F/CFD
Telegraph Canyon Rosd Paseo Del Rey to East of Paseo Ladera 3,452,000 Widening to 6-lane prime
Telegraph Canyon Road 1-805 Interchange Phase II 1,814,000 Interchange Improvements (phase
JIA is under construction)
East "W Street 1-805 Interchange Modifications 3,780,000 Interchange Improvements (Phose I
eompleted)
Otay Lakes Road Telegraph Canyon Road to East Orange 4,574,000 Construction as 6-Iane prime (only
Avenue Phase I - 4 lanes included)
Bonita Road Otay Lakes Road to Central Avenue 370,000 Widening to 4-lane major
Bonita Road Central Avenue to San Miguel Road 792,000 Widening to 4-lane major
San Miguel Road Bonita Road to SR-I25 1,574,500 Second Part of SR-I25 DIF/CFD
Proctor Valley Road Mt. Miguel Road to Hunte Parlcway 5,377 ,000 Construction as 6-lane prime
(East "W Street)
East Orange Avenue Oleander to Sunbow Eastern Boundary 6,266,000 Construction as 6-lane prime
East Palomar Street Oleander to Sunbow Eastern Boundary 6,782,000 Construction as 4-lane major
Hunte Parlcway Proctor Valley Road to Telegraph Canyon 4,395,000 Construction as 4-Iane major
Road
Hunte Parlcway Club House Drive to East Orange Avenue 1,250,000 Construction as 4-lane major
East Orange Avenue Eastlake Parlcway to Hunte Parlcway 6,356,000 Construction as 6-lanc prime
Paseo Ranchero Telegraph Canyon Road to East Orange 3,388,000 Construction as 6-lane prime (only
Avenue Phase I - 4 lanes included)
East Orange Avenue Eastern Sunbow Boundary to Eaotlake 10,961,000 Construction as 6-lane prime
Parkway
East Orange Avenue 1-805 Interchange Modifications 4,064,000 Interchange Improvements
East Palomar Street Eastern Sunbow Boundary to Paseo 3,120,000 Construction as 4-lane major
Ranchero
/9---/?;l
ATTACHMENT #4-1
ATTACHMENT #4-2
TABLE 1
TRANSPORTATION DIF
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
Revised
DIF Street Location Cost as of Status as of June 30, 1994
July, 1992
East Palomar Street I-80S Interchange 2,673,000 Interchange Improvements
Telegraph Canyon Road Hunte Parkway to Wueste Road 3,114,000 Construction as 4-lane major
East Orange Avenue Hunte Parkway to Olympic Training Center 5,104,000 Construction as 4-lane major
Tclegmph Canyon Road SR-I2S to Eastlake Parkway 1,493,900 Widening to 8.1ane prime
EastIake Parkway Fenton Street to Telegraph Canyon Road 980,400 Widening to 6-lane major
East "W Street I-80S to Hidden Vista Drive 901,000 Widening to 8 lanes
Bonita Road Otay Lakes Road Intersection 105,000 Intersection Improvements
Otay Lakes Road Elmhurst Drive Intersection 70,000 Intersection Improvements
East "W Street Olay Lakes Road Intersection 221,000 Intenection Improvements
Traffic Signal System wide 138,000
Interconnection
Eastlake Parkway Eastlake High School Southern Boundary to 2,381,000 Construction u 4-lane major
East Orange Avenue
East "W Street Pasco Del Rey to Tiemo Del Rey 682,000 Street Widening (Phase 1 8< 2
completed)
Bonita Road I-80S to Plaza Bonita Road 270,000 Street Widening
1'OTAL PROJECT COSTS 86,448,800
DIF program support 5" of total project cost 4,322,440
GRAND TOTAL 90,771,240
)9~!7j
ATTACHMENT #4-2
ATTACHMENT #5-A-l
ORDINANCE NO. 2582
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
ESTABLISHING THE TELEGRAPH CANYON SEWER PUMPED
FLOWS DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE TO PROVIDE FOR THE
CONTINGENT CONSTRUCTION OF SEWER IMPROVEMENTS
WITHIN THE TELEGRAPH CANYON SEWER BASIN IF SEWAGE
IS DIVERTED FROM SALT CREEK AND POGGI CANYONS AS A
CONDITION OF ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS FOR
CONSTRUCTION IN THE TELEGRAPH CANYON SEWER PUMPED
FLOWS BASIN
WHEREAS, developers of land within the City should be required to mitigate the burden
created by development through the construction or improvement of Awer facilities within
the boundaries of the development and either the construction or Improvement of sewer facili-
ties outside the boundaries of the development which are needed to provide Arvlce to the
development in accordance with City standards or the payment of a fee to finance a
development's appropriate portion of the tQt81 cost of the Awer facilities; and,
WHEREAS, all develoPf11ent within the City contribute. to the cumulative burden on
various sewer facilities in direct relationship to the amount of population generated by the
development or the gross acreage of the commercial or Industrial land In the development;
and;
WHEREAS, the Telegraph Canyon Sewer Pumped Flows Basin C.Pumped Flows Basin.)
is that area of land shown on the map attached hereto as Exhibit .2. (Exhibit 1 omitted)
which map is generally comprised of those portions of Poggi Canyon and Salt Cr.ek drainage
basin within the City of Chula VISta, or ita sphere of Influenc., from which wastewat.r will
be collected and pumped Into the T.legraph Canyon Sew.r Basin C.Gravity Basin.); and,
WHEREAS, the City d.slra. and de.ired to oversize the Gravity Basin Aw.r facilities
as a backup plan in order to accommodate sewage flow from the Pumped Flow. Ba.in In the
event that flow. from the Pumped Flow. Basin, In combination with the Gravity Basin flOW',
exc.ed the capacity of the Gravity Ba.ln Awege .yst.m befora adequata alt.rnata Awage
fecilities Cgravlty draineg., treatm.nt p1ents, reclamation plants, etc.) are. aveilable in the Salt
Cr.ek end Poggi Cenyon drainage basins to handle the Pumped Flows; and,
WHEREAS, this was and is Intended to be a .backup plan. Inasmuch a. the City
expects that the flow. in the Pumped Flow. Basin will, with the construction of the nec....ry
..w.r faciliti.s C.PoggI Canyon/Salt Creek Facilities.), eventually drain by gravity flow Into
the Poggi Canyon and Salt Creek Sewar Basins C.Poggi Canyon/Salt Creek Sewer Gravity
Basins"), and then Into the Otay Valley; end, .
WHEREAS, at .uch time as it appears, in the .01. discr.tion of the City Council, that
luch Poggi Canyon/Salt Cr.ek Facilities are imminent of construction, it i. the Intention of the
City Council to t.rminat. the imposition of this Development Impact F.e, and further, at suc'
time and In such manner as the City Council, in ita 100e discretion, datermines to be fair a",-
19-1;5
ATTACHMENT #5-A-l
Ordinance No. 2582
Page 2
ATTACHMENT' #5-A~2
~ ....itable return any unused funds to the property owners existing at that time of the
properties for which the fee was collected initially; and.
WHEREAS. on Fabruary 25. 1992 the City Council passed Resolution No. 16518
approving an amendment to the agreement between the City of Chula Vista end Willdan
Associates for preparation of said Backup Plan. therein referred to as the -Amended Plan";
and.
WHEREAS. on February 25. 1992 the City Council passed Resolution No. 16519
approving the First Amendment to the Telegraph Canyon Basin Sewer Monitoring and Gravity
Basin Usage Agreement to provide that EastLake should pay for the praparation of the
-Telegraph Canyon Sewer Basin Improvement and Financing Plan Amendment Incorporating
Pumped Flows" ("Backup Plan").
WHEREAS. pursuant to said agreement with Willdan. Willdan Associates have prepared
a proposed Backup Plan dated June 9. 1993 for epproval by the City Council (herewith done);
and.
WHEREAS. on September 21.1993 a public meeting was held between Staff and the
developers of developments located within tt1e Pumped Flows Basin to discuss the final
Backup Plan and City Staff recommendations for establishing the Telegraph Canyon Sewer
Pumped Flows Basin Development Impact Fee; and.
WHEREAS. on December 7. 1993 a Public Hearing was opened but not completed
Defore the City Council to provide an opportunity for Interested persons to be heard on the
epprova' of the Backup Plan and establishment of the Telegraph Canyon Sewer Pumped Flows
Fee; and.
WHEREAS. said hearing was continued verious times the final one of which was to
February 15. 1994 (hereinafter referrad to as the -Public Hearing"); and.
WHEREAS. the proposed Backup Plan determines that new development within the
Pumped Flows Basin will create adverse Impacts on the City's existing sawer fecllities within
the Gravity Basin (to wit. thet the ..wage expected to be generated from new developmant
within the Pumped Flows Basin, when combined with the ..wage flows from the Gravity
Basin, will exceed the capacity of the current ..wer Iystem In the Gravity Basin). These
impacts must be mitigated by the financing and construction of certain Mwer facilities
identified In this ordinance; and.
WHEREAS. said proposed Backup Plan (11 includes an estimate of ultimate ..wer flowl
anticipated from the Pumped Flows Basin; (21 racommends Improvementa to handle the
combined Incremental increases of ..wage flow anticipated from the Pumped F10wI Basin end
from the Gravity Balin; and (31 establishes a fee peyable by persona obtaining building permits
for developments within the Pumped Flows Basin benefiting from Gravity Basin trunk ..wer
improvementa; and.
/9//7 ?
ATTACHMENT #5-A-2
Ordinance No. 2582
Page 3
ATTACHMENT #5-A-3
WHEREAS. sewer Improvements end e fee to be levied on new development in the
Pumped Flows Besin heve been justified in the proposed Beckup Plen; end,
WHEREAS, the City Council determined, besed upon the evidence presented et the
Public Hearing. Including. but not limited to. the Beckup P1en and the various reportland other
Informetion received by the City Council in the course of its business. thlIt Imposition of the
sewer fecilities development Impact fee on ell developments within the Telegreph Canyon
Sewer Pumped Flows Besin in the City of Chula VISta for which building permits have not yet
been issued is necessary In order to protect the public ufety Ind welfare Ind to ensure
effective implementetion of the City's Generll Plen; Ind,
WHEREAS. the City Council hes determined thlIt the Imount of the fee levied by this
ordinance does not exceed the estlmlted cost of providing the public fecllities.
NOW. THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DOES
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1.
SECTION 2.
SECTION 3.
Approval of Beckup P1en.
The City Council hes Independently reviewed the proposed Beckup Plan
herewith pr..ented, finds that it Is flir, reesoneble Ind equiteble to III
perties, Ind herewith edopts ..me In the form on file with the City Clerk IS
Document No. ,end on file In the Office of the City Engineer.
-Fecilities- .
The fecilities which Ire the subject mltter of the f.. herein esteblished Ire
fully described in the Beckup P1ln It page 24 thereof, Ind the locltions It
which they will be constructed ere more fully described on Pletes 1 through
14 under the uction thereof entitled -Improvemlnt Lacltions- , III of which
flcilities mlY be modified by the City Council from time to time by
resolution (-Flcilities-). The City Council mlY modify or Imend the list of
projects herein considered to be pert of the Fecilities by written resolution
In ordlr to rnalntein cornplilnce with the City'. Cepltal Improvement
Progrlm or to reflect changes In lend development Ind estimated Ind Ictuel
wIsteweter flow.
Territory to Which Fee .. Appliceble.
The lrel of the City of ChulI V1ste to which the Fee herein esteblishld shall
be eppliceble .. At forth .. en Exhibit to the Beckup Plen, entitled
-Devalopments Subject to Pumping (Pumped Flows Besln), Telegrlph
Cenyon Sewer Besln, Improvement Ind financing P1ln Amendment,
Incorporating Pumped Flows, - &hown IS being -Prepered: June 23. 1993-
not yet revised. shall be reflrred to herein.. the ~erritory- or Iltematlvel'
)c.;-j? ?
ATTACHMENT #5-A-3
Ordinance No. 2582
Page 4
ATTACHMENT #5-A-4-
"Pumped Flows Basin" end is generelly described as that eree to the East
of the Telegreph Cenyon Sewer Basin, within the Selt Creek end Poggi
Cenyon Basins.
SECTION 4.
Purpose.
By Ordinance No. 2533, the City Council epproved e plen ("Grevity Basin
P1en"' for the finencing end construction of the sewer-releted fecilities
necessery to serve only the sewege trensmission demends for the EDU's in
the Gravity Basin. The purpose of this ordinance is to provide the necessary
financing to oversize such sewer-related fecilities in the Telegreph Cenyon
Sewer Gravity Basin, IS defined in Ordinance No. 21533, Section 2, Territory
("Gravity Basin"'. to accommodete sewege flows pumped into the Grevity
Basin from the Pumped Flows Basin.
SECTION 5.
Establishment of Fee.
A development Impact fee \,"Fee"', to be expressed on I per Equivalent
Dwelling Unit ("EDU"' basis, Ind payable prior to the issuance of I building
permit unless security therefore by Letter of Credit, es herein permitted, is
on deposit with the City. for a development project within the Territory, is
hereby esteblished.
SECTION 6.
Due on Issuance of Building Permit; Exception for Letters of Credit
Procedure.
A. When Plyeble. The Fee shall be plid In clsh upon (elrly plyment is not
permitted' the Issulnce of I building permit, except IS provided In
subparlgraph B.
B. Letter of Credit. A building permit mlY issua without the peyment of
the Fee in clsh if (use of the following procedure shill herein be referred
to es the "Letter of Credit Procedure") the Property owner of the
property for which the building permit is sought, or herlhis predecessor
-In interest, has pllced on deposit with the City Engineer at or prior to
the time I final subdivision mlp is epproved by the City for the units
which would otherwise be subject to the Fee on the issuance of a
building permit, e letter of credit in a form accepteble to the City
Attorney and which, at a minimum, provides for the following:
(1) The Letter of Credit shill be irrevocable until relelsed in writing
by the City in the mlnner herein provided. It shill also
apeclficllly provide thlt a chlnge of ownership of the property
for which the Fee II paYlble ahlll not be I blsis for releasing or
-
/C:;~/?f5
ATTACHMENT #5-A-4
Ordinance No. 2582
Pege 5
ATTACHMENT #5-A-5
cancelling the Letter of Credit.
(2) The Letter of Credit shall be for e term not less then 3 yeers
unless a shorter term is allowed by the City Attorney in
conjunction with the City Engineer.
(3) The Latter of Credit nil provide thet at the axpiretion of the
Term. the bank issuing the Latter of Credit shell pay the full
amount over to the City unless the Term thereof is extended or
the obligetion excused by written direction of the City Attorney
and City Engineer.
(4) The Letter of Credit nil provide thet the City mey
unconditionally drew on all or part of the Amount on demand by
the City by written notice thereof and without offering eny other
justificetion or documentation (Authority for draws on the Letter
of Credit as between the City and the Beneficiery is hereinbelow
provided).
(5) The Latter of Credit nil initially be In a minimum amount as
determined by applying the rate of the Fee times the number of
Equivelent Dwelling Units (-EOUs-) within the territory of the
Final Map. Such amount nil be Increesed or decreased from
time to time as the rete of the Fee is adjusted by the Cit.
Council.
C. Right of City to Draw on the Latter of Credit. The City may exercise ita
right to draw on the letter of credit In any of the following
circumstances.
(1) The property owner who would otherwise be responsible for
peying the Fee hereunder falls to maintain the Letter of Credit In
the minimum' emount required by this Ordinance. In which case
the full emount of the Letter of Credit may be drawn upon by the
City.
(2) The City determines. in Ita sole discration. thet ell or a portion of
the Latter of Credit Is naceaaary to plan. design or construct. or
otherwise assist In the p1ennlng. design or constrUction of. all or
a portion of the Facilities. In which case the City Is authorized to
dr.w. for each such Facility. or portion thereof, from time to time
as planning. design and conatruction prOCHds, en emount which
represents the entire ae,tuel coat of the Facility, Including extra
work and overruns, times a fraction, the numerator of which
equels the estimated coats of the Facility to be borne by the
Pumped Sewer Flows. as set forth In the latest Engineer's Report
updating the OIF, and the denominator of which represents thP
/1~/7/
ATTACHMENT #5-A-5
Ordinance No. 2582
Page 6
ATTACHMENT #5-A-6
total cost of the Facility as estimated in the latest Engineer's
Report updating the DIF.
(3) The property owner otherwise responsible for the payment of the
Fee takes any act or lUffers any act, or the bank on which the
Letter of Credit is drawn takes any act or suffers any act, which,
in the sole opinion and discretion of the City, creates a
reasonable risk that the Letter of Credit may not be honored on
demand by the City, in which case the City is authorized to draw
on the Letter of Credit in such an amount as the City determines
is necessary to avoid the risk of loss.
D. Release of the Letter of Credit by City. The City shell issue to the Bank
written release of the Letter of Credit, or such appropriate portion
thereof, in any of the following circumstances:
(1) The beneficiary has constructed, or causad to be constructed, to
the satisfaction of the City, the Facilities or portion thereof
agreed to by the City in accordance with the procadures for
developer construction hereinbelow set forth in Sections 12 and
13. '
(2) The City Council has determined, in its sole discretion, that such
Poggi CanyonlSalt Creek Facilities are imminent of construction.
E. Remedies of City if Letter of Credit procedura violated. In the event that
a draw on the Letter of Credit is not honored on demand as herein
provided, the beneficiary (e.g., the Developer) of the Letter of Credit
shall immediately deposit with the City the full amount thereof in cash,
which shall be deemed to be a debt immediately due and payable of the
beneficiary, and upon the failure to do so. the City Is authorized among
other remedies. to Institute litigation and to withhold approval of any
edditional permits or other entitlements.
SECTION 7,
Determination of Equivalent Development Units.
Each single family detached dwelling or single family attached dwelling shell
be considered one EDU for purposes of this Fee. Eech unit within a multi-
family dwelling shall be considered .75 EDU. . Every other commercial.
Industrial. non-profit. public or quasi-public. or other usage shell be charged
at a rate calculated in accordence with figure 5. Page 8 of the Backup Plan.
SECTION 8.
Time to Determine Amount Due; Advance Payment Prohibited.
Unless the Letter of Credit Procedure Is used. the Fee for each development
17-/5'0
ATTACHMENT #5-A-6
Ordinance No. 2582
Page 7
ATTACHMENT #5-A-7
shall be calculated at the time of building permit issuance and shall be the
amount as indicated at that time and not when the tentative map or final
map was grented or applied for, or when the building permit plan check was
conducted, or when application was made for the building permit. If the
Letter of Credit Procedure Is used, the amount of the Letter of Credit shall
be determined at the time the Final Map Is approvad and shall be adjusted
from time to time as the City determines appropriate.
SECTION 9.
Purpose and Use of Fee.
The purpose of the Fee ia to pey for the planning (including preparation of
the Backup Plan), design, construction, repair, maintenance, and/or
financing (including the cost of Interest and other financing costs as
appropriate) of the Facilities, or reimbursement to the City or, at the
discretion of the City if approved in advance in writing. other third parties
for advancing costs actually incurrad for planning. designing. constructing,
or financing the Facilities.
SECTION 10. Amount of Fte; Amendment of Master Fee Schedule.
The Fee shall be calculated at the rate of tl6D per EOU. Chapter XV of th
Master Fee Schedule ia hereby amended to add Section B. which shall read
as follows:
-B. Talegraph Canyon Sewer Pumped Flows Development Impect Fee.
This eection Ia Intended to memorlaliza the key proviSiOns of
Ordinance No. , but uid Ordinance governs over the provisions
of the Master Fee Schedule. For axample, In the event of a conflict
in Interpretation between the Master Fee Schedule and the
Ordinance, or In the avent thet additional rules applicable to the
Imposition of the Fee, the language of the Ordinance governs.
a. Territory to which Fee applicable.
The area of the City of Chula VIsta to which the Fae herein
astablished shall be applicable Is eet forth as an Exhibit to the
~ckup Plan, antitled -Developments Subject to Pumping
(Pumped Flows Basin), Talegraph Canyon Sewar Basin,
Improvement and financing Plan Amendmant, Incorporating
Pumped Flows, - shown as being -Praparad: June 23. 1993. not
yet ravised, shall be referred to herein as the -Territory- or
alternstively -Pumped Flows Basin- and Is generally described as
that area to the Eest of the Talagraph Canyon Sewar Basir
within the Salt Creak and Poggi Canyon Basins.
-
J f~)cf)
ATTACHMENT #5-A-7
Ordinance No. 2582
Page 8
ATTACHMENT #5-A~8.
b. Rate per EDU.
The Fee shall be calculated at the rate of $560 per EDU, which
rate shall be adjusted from time to time by the City Council.
c. EDU calculation.
Each single family detached dwelling or single family attached
dwelling shall be considered one EDU for purposes of this Fee.
Each unit within a multi-family dwelling shall be considered .75
EDU. Every other commerciel, industrial, non-profit, public or
quasi-public, or other usage shall be charged at a rate calculated
in accordance with Figure 5, Page 9 of the Backup Plan.
d. When Payable.
The Fee shall be paid in cash not later than immediately prior to
the issuance of a building permit, except that a Letter of Credit
Procedure is permitted for this Fee in the adopting Ordinance, as
same may, from time to time, be amended."
~
The City Council intends to review the amount of the Fee annually or from
time to time. The City Council may, at such reviews, edjust the amount of
this Fee as necessary to assura construction and operation of the Facilities,
the reasons for which adjustments may include, but are limited to, the
following: changes in the costs of the Facilities as may be reflected by
such index as the Council deems appropriate, such as the Engineering-News
Record Construction Index; changes in the type, size, location or cost of the
Facilities to be financed by the Fae; changes in land use on approved
tantative maps or Specific Plan Amandments; other sound engineering,
financing and planning information. Adjustments to the above Fee may be
made by resolution emending the Master Fee Schedule.
SECTION 11.
Authority for Accounting and Expenditures.
The proceeds collected from the imposition of the Fee shell be deposited
Into e public facility financing fund C"Telegraph Cenyon Sewer Basin
Pumped Flows Development Impact Fee Fund", or alternatively heraln
"Fund" or "TCSBPF DIF Fund"' which is hereby created and such proceeds
shall be expended only for the purposes SIt forth in this ordinance.
The Director of Finance is authorized to esteblish various accounts within
the Fund for the Facilities identified in this ordinance and to periodically
maka expenditures from the Fund for the purposes SIt forth herein in
accordance with the facilitias phasing plan or capital improvamant plan
adoptad by the City Council.
)9~/!J:;'"
ATTACHMENT #5-A-8
Ordinance No. 2582
Page 9
ATTACHMENT #5-A-9
SECTION 12. Revision and Refund of Faas.
A. Suspension. At auch tima (-Gravity Access Point in Time-) as a parcel
of property within the Tarritory Is. In the opinion of the City Engineer.
able to obtain ..wer "Mce by virtue of gravity ..wer "Mce available
In the Salt Creek or the Poggi Canyon Basins. the Fae for luch parcel
shall be suspended.
B. Refund. If the Fee has already been paid in cash for the parcel. the Fee
shall be returned to the owner or owners of the property at the time the
Council passes a written resolution certifying the completion of the
.ntire plannad PoggllSalt Creek Facilities for the PoggilSalt Creek Sewer
Gravity Basin system, and then to .Ich owner in a manner deemed fair
and equitable by the City Council. In the ab..nce of an alternative
determination of fairness by the City Council. a refund which divides the
remaining unused balance by the EDU's which contributed to the Fund
shall be deemed a fair method.
C. Relea.. of Letters of Credit. If the cash paymant of the Fee has been
evoided by a developer by the deposit of a Letter of Credit pursuant to
the Letter of Credit Procedure herein authorized. the Letter of Credit
shall be released either (1) at such time that the City Council certifies by
written resoll,ltion that the entire PoggilSalt Creek Sewer Gravity Basi
Facilities exists for ,II parts of the Salt Cr.ak .nd Poggi Canyons or (2)
at such aooner time es the City Council det.rmines that the total
balance of the letters of cr.dit Is not neceuary to complete the
planning, design and construction of the Facilities (i.... In T.legraph
Canyon Sewer Basin). certifies the .mount needed to complete
construction of the Facilities, .nd authoriz.s the rel.a.. of 75% of the
remainder by written rasolution. apecifying tha recipients of auch
relea..d Letters of Credit in a fair and equitable menner.
SECTION 13. Findings.
The City Council finds that collection of the Fees utablished by this
ordinance at the time of the building permit Is neceuary to .nsure that
funds will be aveilable for the construction of facilities concurrent with the
need for the.. facilities and to ensura certainty In the capital facilities
budgeting for growth impact.d publiC facilities.
SECTION 14. Fee Additional to other Fees and Charges.
The Fae .stablished by this eection Is In addition to the requirements
Imposed by other City lawl, policies or regulations relating to tIv
)~-/Y;J
ATTACHMENT #5-A-9
Ordinance No. 2582
Page 10
ATTACHMENT #5-A-~O
construction or the financing of the construction of public improvements
within subdivisions or developments, and is specifically Intended to be in
addition to a development impact fee for the construction of the Poggi
Canyon and/or Salt Creek Sewer Gravity Basin Facilities, such that a payor
of this fee may also be raquired to pay any developmant impact fee charged
for such facilities.
SECTION 15.
Mandatory Oversizing of Facility; Duty to Tender Reimbursement Offer.
Whenever a developer of e development project in the Territory of the
Pumped Flows Basin is required as e condition of approval of an entitlement
(e.g., General Plan Amendment, Pre-zoning, General Development Plan, SPA
Plan, etc.) to cause a portion of the sawer systam which is the subject
matter of a Facilities enhancement planned for Improvement under the
Gravity Basin Plan to be oversized under the Backup Plan, the City may
require the developer to Install tha Facilities according to design
specifications approved by the City, that being with the supplementa' size
or capacity in order to accommodate estimated ultimate flow as indicated
in the Basin Plan and subsequent amandments. If such a raquirement is
Imposed, the City shall first grant credits against the developer's obligation
to pay the Fae, and, as to any excess, offer to reimburse the developer from
the Fund either in cash or over time as FH' ara collacted, at the option of
the City, for costs incurred by the developer for the design and construction
of the Facility not to excead the astimatad cost of that particular Facility as
Included in the calculation and updating of the Fee, and in an amount agreed
to in advance of their expenditure in writing by the City. The City may
updste the Fee calculation as City deem. appropriate prior to making such
offer. This duty to extend credits or offer reimbursement shall be
Independent of the developer's obligation to pey the Fee.
SECTION 17.
Voluntary Construction of a Portion of the Facilities; Duty of City to Tendar
Reimbursement Offer.
If a developer Is willing and agrees in writing to design and construct a por-
tion of the Facilitie. in conjunction with the prosacution of a development
project within the Territory (WWorkw" the City may, as part of the written
agreement, grant credits ageinst the Developer'. obligation to pey the Fee,
and may thereefter, use the proceed. of the Fund to raimburse the
developer from .the Fund aither at the time the axpenditure. are Incurrad or
over time as Fee. are collected, at the option of the City, for costa Incurred
by the developer for the de.ign and construction of the Facility not to
exceed the estimated cost of that perticuler Facility a. Included In the
calculation and updsting of the Fae, and in an amount agread to in advance
of their expenditure In writing by the City. The City may update the Fee
calculation e. City deem. appropriate prior to making IUch offer. Thi. duty
Jc;---)f'tj
ATTACHMENT #5-A-IO
.
Ordinance No. 2582
Page 1 1
ATTACHMENT IS-A-ll
to extend credits or offer reimbursement ahall be independent of the
developer's obligation to pay the Fee.
SECTION 18. Procedure for Entitlement to Reimbursement Offer.
The City's extension of a credit or . reimbursement offer to a developer
pursuant to Section 15 or 16 above ahall be conditioned on the developer
complying with the terms and conditions of this section:
A. Written authorization ahall be requested by the developer from the City
and iasued by the City Council by written resolution before developer
may incur any costs eligible for reimbursement relating to the Work.
B. The request for authorization ahall contain the following information. end
auch other information .s may from time to time be requested by the
City:
(1) Oatalled descriptions of the Work with the preliminary cost
estimate.
-
C. If the Council grants authorization, It ahall be by writtan agreement with
the Developer, .nd on the following conditions .mong such other
conditions as the Council may from time to time impose:
(11 Oeveloper ahall prepare all p1ans.nd specifications and submit
ume to the City for approval;
(21 Developer ahallsecure .nd dedicate any right-of-way required for
the Work;
(31 Oaveloper ahall ..cure all required permits .nd environmentsl
clearances nec....ry for construction of the project;
(41 Developer ahall provide performance bonds in . form .nd
.mount, .nd with . auraty aatisf.ctory to the City;
(51 Oaveloper ahall pay all City f..s .nd costs.
(61 The City ahall be held harmless and indemnified, and upon
demand by the City, defanded by the developer for any of the
costs and liabilities ...oclated with the constrUCtion of the
project.
(7) The developer ahall advence all nec....ry funds to design and
construct the project.
J/~/~/
ATTACHMENT IS-A-ll
Ordinance No. 2582
Page 12
(81
(91
(101
(11 I
(121
(131
ATTACHMENT #5-A-12
The developer shall secure at least three (3) Qualified bids for
work to be done. The construction contract shall be granted to
the lowest Qualified bidder. Any claims for additional payment
for extra work or charges during construction shall be justified
and shall be documented to the satisfaction of the Director of
Public Works.
The developer shall provide a detailed cost estimate which
itemizes those costs of the construction attributable to the Work.
The estimate is preliminary and subject to final determination by
the Director of Public Works upon completion of the Public
Facility Project.
The agreement may provide that upon determination of
satisfactory incremental completion of a Facility, as approved
and certified by the Director of Public Works, the City may pay
the developer progress payments, or grant incremental credits,
In an amount not to exceed 75 percent of the estimated cost of
the construction completed to the time of the progress payment
but shall provide in such case for the retention of 25% of such
costs until Issuanoe by the City of a Notice of Complation.
The agreement may provide that any funds owed to the
developer as reimbursements may be applied to the developer's
obligations to pay the Fee for building permits to be applied for
in the future.
When all work has been completed to the satisfaction of the
City, the developer shall submit verification of payments made
for the construction of the project to the City. The Director of
Public Works shall make the final determination on expenditures
which are eligible for reimbursement.
(141
After final determination of expenditures eligible for
reimbursement has been made by the Public Works Director, the
parties may egree to offset the developer's duty to pay Fees
reQulrad by this ordinance egainst the City's duty to reimburse
the developer.
If, after offset If any, funds are due the developer under this
section, the City shell reimburse the developer from the Fund
either at the time the expenditures are Incurred or over time as
Fees ere collected, at the option of the City, for eligible costs
Incurred by the developer for the design and construction of the
Facility not to exceed the estimated cost of that particular
Facility as included in the calculation and updating of the Fee; or
the developer may waive reimbursement end use the amount due
)9")%~
ATTACHMENT #5-A-12
.
Ordinance No. 2582
Pege 13
ATTACHMENT '5-A-13
them IS credit .gainst futurl Development Impact Fee
obligations.
SECTION 18. Procedurl for Fee Modificltion
Any developer who. because of the nature or type of uses proposed for I
development project. ContlndS thet Ipplicltion of the Fee imposed by this
ordinance is unconstitutional or unr.leted to mitigation of the burdens of the
devllopm.nt. may Ipply to the City Council for I modification of the Fee
.nd the mlnner In which It Is calcullted. The .pplicltion shell be mede in
writing Ind filed with the City CI.rk not Iatlr then tIn (101 days Ifter notice
is giv.n of the public hearing on the development permit Ipplicltion for the
project. or if no dev.lopm.nt permit is r.qulr.d. It the time of the filing of
the building permit epplicltion. The Ipplication shell atete In detail the
flctual besis for the claim of modification. Ind shell provide In engine.ring
.nd Iccounting report showing the overllllmpact on the DIF Ind the lbility
of the City to compl.te construction of the Flcilities by making the
modification requested by the Ippliclnt. The CIty Council shell make
reesonable .fforts to consid.r the epplicltion within sixty 1601 days eft.r its
filing. The 41.cision of the City COU'1Cil ehllI be final. The proc.dure
provid.d by this eection is .dditional to eny other procedure euthoriz.d by
law for prot.ction or chell.nging the Fee impoeed by this ordinanc..
SECTION 19. F.e Appliceble to Public Ag.nci.s.
Dev.lopm.nt projects by public agencies. Including 8ChooIs. shell not be
.x.mpt from the provisions of the Fe..
SECTION 20. Aseessment District.
If eny ....ssm.nt or lpeclel tlXing district is .steblished to d.sign.
construct .nd pay for .ny or .11 of the Flclllties I-Work A1t.rnativ.ly
Flnanc.d-I. the owner or developer of . project may IPply to the City
Council for reimburllrnent from the Fund In .n Imount lquel to thet portion
of the cost Included in the calculetion of the Fee attributable to the Work
A1t.rnatively Financed. In this regerd. the Imount of the ,eimbureement
shell be beeed on the costs Included in the Beckup Plan. .s Im.nd.d from
time to tim.. Ind therefore. will not Include Iny portion of the financing
costa .ssoclsted with the formetion of the ....ssment or other speciel
tlxing district.
)7-/8-7
ATTACHMENT '5-A-13
Ordinance No. 2582
Page 14
CTION 21.
SECTION 22.
SECTION 23.
SECTION 24.
ATTACHMENT #5-A-i4
Expiration of this Ordinance.
This ordinance shall be of no further force and effect when the City Council
determines that the amount of Fees which have been collected raaches an
emount equal to the cost of the Facilities.
Time Limit for Judicial Action.
Any judicial ection or proceeding to etteck, review. At aside, void or annul
this ordinance shall be brought within the time period as astablished by
Government Code Section 54995 after the effective date of.this ordinance.
CECA Findings for Statutory Exemption.
The City Council does hereby find thet the Fee herein imposed is for the
purpose of obtaining funds for capitel projects nece...ry to maintain Arvice
within axisting Arvice eraas. The Council finds that the proposed Facilities
are in existing rights of way parallel to or rep/acing existing Awer lines.
Therefore, the City finds th8t the adoption of this Ordinance is statutorily
exempt under the provisions of Public Resources Code Section 21080 (bl
(81 and CECA Guidelines Section 15273.
Other Not Previously Defined Terms.
For the purposes of this ordinance. the following words or phrases shall be
construed as defined in this Section. unless from the context it appears that
a different maaning is intended.
A. "Building Permit" means a permit required by and iuued pursuant to the
Uniform Building Code as adopted by reference by this City.
B. "Developer" means the owner or developer of a development.
C. "Development Permit" means any discretionary permit. entitlement or
approval for a development project iuued under eny zoning or
aubdivision ordinance of the City.
D. "Development Project" or "Development" means any activity delCribed
In Section 65927 and 65928 of the State Goverrvnant Code.
E. "Single Family Atteched Dwelling" meens II single family dwelling
attached to another lingle family dwelling; each on their own lot.
J9---J?r
ATTACHMENT #5-A-14
.
Ordinance No. 2582
Page 15
ATTACHMENT #5-A-15
SECTION 25.
Effective Date.
This ordinance shall become effective sixty (601 days after its second
reading and adoption.
I
Bruce M. Boogaar
City Attorney
Presented by
ohn P. Lippitt
Director of Public Works
,
"
19---/5';
ATTACHMENT #5-A-15
Ordinance No. 2582
Page 16
ATTACHMENT #5'-Ar16'
PASSED, APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chuta Vista,
....Momia. this 15th day March. 1994. by the following vote:
AYES: Councilmembers: Fox. Horton, Moore. Rindone, Nader
NOES: Councilmembers: None
ABSENT: Councilmembers: None
ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: None
-1: /??
Tim Nader, Mayor
ATTEST:
.
()'/~ C a.
'I . .
(" '. ... / '
. . fL' , 'Jm{f
Beverly A, Authelet. City Clerk
STATE OF CALIFORNIA I
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO I as.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA I
I, Beverly A. Authelet. City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista. Califomia. do heraby certify that
the foregoing Ordinance No. 2582 had its first reading on March 8. 1994, and Ita Hcond
reading and adoption at a regular meeting of said City Council on the 15th day of March,
1994.
Executed this 15th day of March, 1994.
~Qa~
Beverly A Authelat, City Clerk
-
)~--/c;f)
ATTACHMENT #5-A-16
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
IMPLEMENTATION
ATTACHMENT #5-6
FIGURE 17
SEWER SEGMENTS AND Com FOR PuMPING IMPROVEMENTS ONLY
MB MB Add'. Improvement Leagth Vnit TolaI
Phase Down Vp Size Type (Feet) Cost (S) (S)
(Inches) DiIF.
AI 55 65 5 Parallel 4,400 82.00 360,800
A2 65 78 3 Parallel 6,900 12.00 82,800
A3 78 80 5 Parallel 1,200 22.00 26,400
A4 80 81 15 Parallel 600 82.00 49,200
AS 81 84 5 Parallel 1,800 22.00 39,600
A6 84 95 15 ParalJel 6,320 82.00 518,240
B 107A 109 15 Parallel 600 82.00 49,200
CI 46 52 6 Parallel 1,770 26.00 46,020
C2 52 55 6 ParalJel 280 26.00 7,280
DI 31 32 27 Replace 430 160.00 68,800
D2 32 34 3 Replace 900 16.00 14,400
D3 34 41 9 ParalJel 2,440 40.00 97,600
E I 4 27 Replace 970 160.00 155,200
. F 95 103 12 Parallel 3,000 70.00 210,000
01 8 II 21 Replace 590 130.00 76,700
02 12 31 21 Replace 6,620 130.00 860,600
H 41 46 12 ParalJel 1,490 70.00 104,300
I 4 6 24 Replace 260 144.00 37,440
CONSTRucnON TOTAL 40,570 2.804,580
Ell&iDeeriD&, Inspection, Sur.eyill& @ 15" 42Q,687
ConliD&encies @ 25" 806,317
SuIrroTAL 4,031,584
MOoilOriD& @ $3,000 each MH Up-DowD: 6.8 lUld 105-107 6,000
Fee Repon and Analysis 31,000
TOTAL 4,068,584
City Administration @ 2" 81,372
GIIA....'D TOTAL 4,149,956
/1~/// 24
Telegraph Canyon Sewer Basin
Improllf!menr and Financing Plan
IncorporlZling Pumped FloM'S
ATTACHMENT #5-6
ATTACHMENT #6
TABLE 2
PUBLIC FACILITIES DIF PROJECTS
as of the June 26, 1993 update
Estimated
PFDIF Component Cost as of Status as of
June 26, 1993 June 30, 1994
Civic Center expansion $11,831,566 Property acquired for parking .xpansion. Major
portion of the .xpansion will be in the futur..
Polic. facility 5,144,573 Remod.1 portion compl.ted. Records manag.m.nt,
comput.r aid.d dispatch and mohil. digital terminal
portion will be don. in the futur..
N.w corporate yard 13,963,944 Siting of the n.w corporation yard is complete. Design
and construction to be done.
New libraries 14,682,707 The South Chula Vista Library is und.r construction.
The initial installation of the automated library system
is complete. Future librari.s will be built in the
Eastern Territories.
Fire suppression 4,074,661 Compl.ted .I.m.nts are the master plan, Station 1
.xpansion, training tower and interim Station 6. In
progress is the radio communications tower. To be
done in the future are the classroom, relocation of
Stations 3 & 4, brush rig and perman.nt Station 6.
GIS 749,922 The major portion of the installation is compl.te.
Mainframe 322,263 New mainframe purchase complete. Enhanc.ments
r.maining to do.
Telephone 432,305 Major portion of the telephon. system upgrade is
complete.
Records Manag.ment 123,791 Project in proc....
Administration 1,975,400 On-going activity.
J1-/1cJ-
ATTACHMENT #6
01- Aug -94 (c :lgpm\95STMF.CIP)
IA MAJORSTREETS
P.Tr♦ Pmject Title
CITY OP CNULA VISTA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
ADOPTED FIVE YEAR PLAN
FY 1994/95 through FY 19MM
............ NEW APPROPRIATIONS PROPOSED ....................
Project Funding Tout Funding Anticipated
Total Sources Appropriated Previously FY 1994195 FY 1995/% FY 199497 FY 1997196 FY 1996199 Project Completion
TLN Appropriated Adopted Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Authnriaed Due Comments
FY 9"S
CURRENT PROJECTS
'
so
ST136
Dual left Tom lasses-
5106,200 SIGNAL
SO FY69
Bonito Road at Ouy lakes Rd
GASTAX
ST123 Street Widening-
$12,216,945 RDAC?AY
52,696,705
52,696,705
so
So
s0
$0
so FY67
Valley Road
ASSESS
$6,415,113
16,415,113
so
SO
f0
so
$0
�Gtay
IotescLaege improvemeuu, Phese B
so so
SIM105
ISOS/1StseeslnmFdme
53.114,400 DBTIRANS
so
Improvementa, Phase B
-
\^
TRKSEWER
SL16IA00
$1,161,000
so
SO
s0
s0
$0
C-)
DIFIRANS
SDGEWA
5420,000
$962,200
5120.000
5962,200
SO
SO
so
So
So
so
50
so
50
So
ran
17DGATTON
S72.$00
$72A0
so
so
s0
s0
s0
STI300 Street Recooswrtom-
S3,%IAW TRANSNET
$3,501,600
$3,501,600
RI
SO
So
5o
SO FYU
217,500
Broadaray, l to L
so
ST136
Dual left Tom lasses-
5106,200 SIGNAL
SO FY69
Bonito Road at Ouy lakes Rd
GASTAX
S1142
Bicycle Lasses-
$ 0.3W TDA
so
F Sheet, 4th so 3rd
510,300
S1143
Broadway, Napo on Assisi St
5233,650 TRANSNET
S M302
Fourth Avenue -CV Adult
5360,000 17F
S600A00
ScbooYOraoge Avenue
TRANSNEI'
SIM3%
1405l1'ekgmph Cayes Road
51,700,000 DIFMANS
S143A00
IotescLaege improvemeuu, Phese B
so so
SIM105
ISOS/1StseeslnmFdme
53.114,400 DBTIRANS
so
Improvementa, Phase B
-
7D
SMAOO
so
--I
9 MWII
Bonin Road Bicycle lace
$177ADD TDA
C-)
m
x
S `W12
Bonito Rd., 1803 a ea Pl
S270A00 DIFIRANS
ran
Z
Bonita Rd
--1
v TIM319
Otay valley Rd. Ph III
S930A00 TRANSNEI'
t
217,500
$17,5W
so
$0
SO
so
SO FY69
566.700
5661700
s0
so
s0
so
s0
510,300
510,300
SO
SO
s0
so
so FY69
5230.5W
$2i0,50D
$0
$2,106,000
so so
SM,335
SO
$292,335
so
S0 so
$67,665
$67,665
so
s0
s0 s0
SWAM
SWA00
SO
$1,400im
s0 s0
S600A00
S600A00
$0
52,514,400
$0 s0
$177,000
$31,000
S143A00
so
so so
$MAW
S270AOO
so
so
s0 s0
$930AW
$130AO0
SMAOO
so
s0 s0
1
3
FY 95 UnderCootuuction.
Jun 94 Design in FY 92193
Construction in FY 94/95
Jun 94 Coordioatingsith County
Pmjca.
so FY94
Jun 95
Design in FY 93/94
$0 FY94
Jun %
Design in FY 92193
5o
Construction in FY 93194
s0 FY93
FY 94M
Design in FY 93194
Cossswctom in FY 91195
so FY94
Jun 95
Design in FY 93194
n
ComOUCtioo in FY 94/95
'--4
1
I.
s0 FY%
Jun 9S
x
3
m
s0 FY94
Z
V
$0 FY94 .e
OI-Aug-94 (c:lqpro\95STMF.CIP)
CI1Y OF CHULA VISTA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMEmS PROGRAM
ADOncD FIVE YEAR Pv.N
FY 1994195 IbrollJ,b FY 19981)9
IA MAJOR SlREETS
............NEW APPROPRIATIONS PROPClSED"'....................
PJT# Project TIde Project Fuadia& Tola1 Fundin& Anticipated
Total So..... Appropriated Previously FY 199<195 FY 1995196 FY 1996J97 FY 1997198 FY 1993/99 . Project Completion
110m Appropriated Adopted ~ Proposed Proposed Proposed Authorized 0... Comments
FY 94195
ST961 Sheet WideDine. MaiD SI, $3,600,000 1RANSNET SSOO,OOO S440.000 $60.000 $100,000 $3,000.000 SO SO FY94 JUD96
ladustriallo Fourth
TOTAlS
12 CURRENT PROIEC1S $7.113.... $1,183,044 S7,l83,0.t.4 SO SO SO SO SO
FUNDING SUMMARY GASTAX 181.100 $88,100 SO SO SO SO SO
'-. CURRENT PROJECTS TDA S2I1,JOO S74,300 SI43,ooo SO SO SO SO
't DIFTRANS 51~90.000 SI~90.000 SO $3.914,000 SO SO SO
RDAOTAY S2.....105 S2,896.705 SO SO SO SO SO
, TRANSNET S5.249,165 $4.389.765 SIOO.OOO S2,208,ooo S3.ooo.000 SO SO
"""
~ SIGNAl. St7 ,300 S17,300 SO SO SO SO SO
ASSESS $6.415,413 $6,415,413 SO SO SO SO SO
~ SEWER $1,161.000 $1,161.000 SO SO SO SO SO
SDGElOA . $062,200 S962,2OO SO SO SO SO SO
TPF S292,335 SO S292,335 SO SO SO SO
IrnOATION S72,OOO S72,OOO SO SO SO SO SO
Totals SII,S90.9" SI7~9S,513 SI,295,335 $6.122,000 $3.000.000 SO SO
NEW PROIEC1S
)>
S1Ml20 IS/Palomar Inlercban&e SS5.ooo GASTAX SS5.000 SO SS5.000 SO SO SO SO FY9S --l
--l
Slady )>
n
::I:
)> S1Ml22 0Iay loR' Road-DuaI Left S340,ooo DIFTRANS S340.000 SO S34O.ooo SO SO SO SO FY95 :<:
I"T1
--l Tu.. ...... :z
~ --l
n ""
::I: TOTALS ......
:<: I
I"T1 9 NEW PROIEC1S SS5.000 SS5.000 SO SSS.OOO SO SO SO SO N
:z
--l
""
...... FUNDING SUMMARY GASTAX 155,000 SO SS5.ooo SO SO SO SO
I
N DIF1RANS S340.000 SO $340,000 SO SO SO SO
21
OI-Aug-94 (c,\qpro\9SSTMF.CIP)
CTIY OPCHULA VISTA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROORAM
ADOPTED FIVE YEAR PLAN
FY 199419S duouch FY 19W19
IA MAJOR S1REETS
............NEW APPROPRIATIONS PROPOSED-....................
prr" '-.... Projl!cl11de Pmject FIUIdUI& To'" FUDdiq Anticipated
""-{J To'" Sou"", Appropriated .......usIy FY 1994/9S FY I99S/96 FY I_ FY 199719& FY 19W19 Project Completion
~ Thru Appropriated Adopled Proposed Proposed Proposed Proposed Aulboriud Oalo Comments
FY 9419S
~ lUfAL S39S,OOO SO $39S,ooo SO SO SO SO
\uruRE PROJE.CTI;
S1'J22 5..., Wi<IeoiD&. sas.,IIOO TRANSNET SO SO SO SO SO $154,000 SO Jon 9&
Palomar 5ueet. I-S 10 Industrial
ST933 Cross Ouner Removal.- SI3&,IOO GASTAX SO SO SO SO SI3&,IOO SO SO Jon 9&
SIh....L,Nor1h.
ST937 OIay Valley Road. MaiD
ioRio! SJU,IIOO GASTAX SO SO SO $29,400 S3S7,400 SO SO
S'l941 SllftlCoastJuefioD. S3,307,700 RDABAY SO SO SO 5<22,400 S2,3llS,300 SO SO Jon 97
Marina Partway, E eo I/o 0
ST964 Strftl RemttsbUcIion. $167,000 TRANSNET SO SO SO SO SO $161,000 SO JUD 98
E 5beet,I-S 10 Broadlny
STM310 H Sbeet Bicycle J.aes.. $476,000 TDA SO SO SO 1476,000 SO SO SO
Pha.. I
STM3\4 Oloy La... Rd.... $70,110O D1f"ffiANS SO SO SO S70,IIOO SO SO SO
BoIliIa Rd IDteneclioa
". ".
--l STM3IS EasI H and OIay Lata Rd- $210,110O D1f"ffiANS SO SO SO S2\0,llOO SO SO SO
--l -l
". lalenecbon --l
n ".
::c n
3: ::c
m STM316 OIay laRs Rd aod Elmhurst 566,000 D1f"ffiANS SO SO SO $66,110O SO SO SO 3:
:z m
--l latenutioD :z
--l
""
..... STM311 TeJe&Iat>h c..,.,. Rei- S3,3IS,IIOO D1f"ffiANS SO SO SO S3,3IS,ooo SO SO SO ""
I .....
w Wi<IeoiD& ,
w
OI-Aug-94 (c'lqpro\95STMF.CIP)
IA
MAJOR S1REETS
P1TO'
Project Tide
STM311
ProclOr VaDe, Rd. Ph I
STM321 Moia, 4.h. HiI..,.
lUTALS
12 FUnJRE PROJE.<:TS
fUNDING SUMMARY
Fl.mJRE PROJE.<:TS
,-,
"Cl
\
""-
~
Crn' OF CHULA VISTA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROORAM
ADOYrnD FIVE YEAR PLAN
FY 1994195 Ihroup FY 1998m
............NEW APPROPRIATIONS PROPOSED.....................
Project
Tow
FUDdiD&
Sou"",.
Total
Approprialed
Thm
FY 94195
SO
so
so
ADlicipated
Completion
Olio
eo......b
......... ............................... .............. .............. ............. .............. .............................................. .......... ......................................................
PlJNDING SUMMARY
All PROJE.<:TS IN GROUP IA
".
--l
--l
".
n
:I:
3:
I"T1
:z
--l
""
......
.
~
33 rorAL PROJE.<:TS
.. Group lA .
......... ...............................
Fundin&
Previously
Appropriated
FY 1996/91
Propo>ed
FY 1991193
Propoled
FY 1991199 Projecl
Propooed Aulboriud
FY 1994195
Adoplod
FY 1995196
Propooed
so
15,311,000
so
so
15,371.000 D1FTRANS
S5,OOO,OOO TRANSNET
so
so
so
SI00,ooo $4.300,000
so
S6OO.ooo
S19,969.soo SO SO SO $4.5'1.... $9,351,500 SI,721,ooo $4.300,000
GASTAX SO SO SO S29,4OO 1496,200 SO SO
TRANSNET SO SO SO SO S6OO,ooo $1.721.000 $4.300,000
RDABAY SO SO SO $422,400 S2.115.300 SO SO
IDA SO SO SO $0416,000 SO SO SO
DIF11<ANS SO SO SO 13,661,000 15,311,000 SO SO
rorALS SO SO SO $4.5'1.... $9,351,500 $1,721,000 $4.300.000
GASTAX SI43,1OO $11,100 S55,OOO $29,400 S4'J6,200 SO SO
IDA $117,300 $14.300 SI43.ooo $416,000 SO SO SO
TRANSNET 15,249,765 $4,319,765 SI6O.ooo S2,2OI,ooo $3,000.000 Sl,nl,ooo $4.300,000
DIF11<ANS SI,93O,ooo SI,590.ooo S3<0,OOO S7~75,OOO S5,3n,ooo SO SO
RDABAY SO SO SO $422,400 S2,115.300 SO SO
RDAOTAY S2,196,705 S2,I96,105 SO SO SO SO SO
SIGNAL S17.soo S17,500 SO SO SO SO SO
SDGE20A S962,200 $962,200 SO SO SO SO SO
ASSESS 56,415,413 16,415,413 SO SO SO SO SO
SEWER SI,I61.ooo SI,I61,ooo SO SO SO SO SO
TPF S292,335 SO $292,335 SO SO SO SO
S27,1l11,544 S19,285,911 SI7,595,513 SI,69O,335 SI0,710.... SI2,351,500 SI,72\,ooo $4.300,000
.............. .............. ............. .............. .............................................. ..........
".
--l
--l
".
n
:I:
3:
I"T1
:z
--l
""
......
I
~
......................................................
23
02-Aug-94 (9ITFF.C1P)
CTIY OF CHULA VISTA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENlS PROGRAM
AOOnED FIVE YEAR PLAN
FY.....' lHROUGH FY981'I9
n mAPFIC IMPROVEME/lTS
P.TU PRnJECTlTlU Project Fundi.. Approprialed Pundint .......NEW APPROPRIATIONS PROPC5Eo-....
To'" Sou.... Th.. PRviously FY.....' FY9S196 FY96m FY97m FY93199 Projod Completioa
FY9419S Appropriated Adopled Propo!led Proposed Propo..d PlOpoled Authorized Dale Co......,,,
CURRENT PROJEClli
TFI'2 CALTRANS Mooi...iDl SIO,OOO GASTAX SIO,OOO SIO,OOO SO SO SO SO SO FY89 Ol1-&oio& Coosullant coubact
TFI" PY97J93 Traffic: MoIlhorinc $86,000 IlIFTRANS $86,000 $86.000 SO SO SO SO SO FY93
P_-Growt!I Mpll
TFt4S Traffie: SipaI-3rd aad Ani.. Sl2,100 SIGNAL $82,100 $82,100 SO SO SO SO SO FY93
TFt41 I-30S Projoe. Study S1I9,1OO IlIFTRANS SI19,800 S97,1OO S22,OOO SO SO SO SO FY93
Report
TFt49 Street Li&ht InstIllalion 184.000 GAST AX 184,000 184,000 SO SO SO SO SO FY93
Pmtram-FY91J93
1FlSJ T.\qnlpll Canyoo Rood SIOO,OOO SIGNAL SIOO,OOO S11.ooo 189,000 SO SO SO SO FY94
&. Paseo Ladera-Sipal
TFIS4 Otay lAirs Road aDd Golba... SII3,8OO SIGNAL $113,800 SIIA,IOO SO SO SO SO SO FY94
Sipal
TF21S 1994 TIolf.. MooitoriDe......... 169)00 IlIFTRANS I69,J1JO S69,3llO SO SO SO SO SO FY94
TF219 T..lf.. Sipal-I-30S aDd 0Ianp S449.ooo SIGNAL S237,000 S15,OOO 1212,000 SO SO SO SO FY92 1995 Cbnmt appropriations
CALTRANS 1212,000 SO S212,000 SO SO SO SO ror reasability study only.
'rF22o Tl1IffICSipllllDpnwemeall _.000 SIGNAL S220,200 SISA,200 162,000 SO SO SO SO FY92 Jan93 Coas1nIdKm FY 94
I-AOS and Otay Valley Road ASSESS SIOO,OOO SIOO.ooo SO SO SO SO SO
RDAcrrAY 189,3llO 189,300 SO SO SO SO SO
CALTRANS S334.soo S162,000 SI72,SOO SO SO SO SO
lUTALS SI,363.000 SI,093,soo S769,soo SO SO SO SO
:to 10 CU~nl Projeets :to
--i
--i --i
:to ~ --i
:to
n n
:I: :I:
3:
m { 3:
m
:z :z
--i ~ -l
"" ""
.... ....
. I
c.n .7 c.n
02-Aug-94 (95TFF.CIP)
CI1Y OF CHULA VISTA
C"PIT AL IMPROVEMENlS PROGRAM
"DOP'rnD P1VE YI!AR PlAN
FY~nlTHROUOHPY9~
D lRMFIC IMPROVEMENTS
prr" PROJECT'ITI1.E ....ject PlIIu&"I /qIproprialed Fundin& .......NEW APPROPRIATIONS PROPOSED-....
Tolll So'IUS n". Prrviously FY_l FY951'J6 FY96/97 FY97193 FY98n9 ....ject Completion
FY9....5 Appropriated "OOpled Propooed ....posed Proposed Proposed Authorized Dale Comments
FUNDING SUMMARY GASTJIX I~,ooo I~,ooo SO SO SO SO SO
SIGN"'" $753.100 $395,100 $363,000 SO SO SO SO
...s5ESS $100,000 $100,000 SO SO SO SO SO
RD"arAY S39,JOO S39,JOO SO SO SO SO SO
DtFfRANS $275.100 1253,100 S22,000 SO SO SO SO
e.....mANS S546,SOO 1162,000 IJM,SOO SO SO SO SO
Toll' SU63.000 11.093,SOO 1769,lOO SO SO SO SO
NEW PROJECTS
11'227 LertTam Si&nals3 1131,000 GRANT S116,<<IO SO In6,400 SO SO SO SO FY95
Loa""" SIGN"'" $'.,600 SO $14,600 SO SO SO SO
TF22lI 9SlTtaffie Monjlorin~ S69,SOO DtFfRANS S09,SOO SO S69,lOO SO SO 10 SO FY9l
J'n>&r.om
TF229 Bay Blvd Taffie II',SOO SIGN"'" II',SOO SO II4,lOO SO SO 10 SO FY95
Fluher
T01"ALS I2tS,ooo 1215,000 SO 121l,ooo SO SO SO 10
3 NEW PROJECTS
FUNDING SUMMARY DtFfRANS S69,SOO SO S69,lOO SO SO 10 SO
.........jeets SIGN"'" II',SOO SO II4,lOO SO SO SO SO
GRANT SI16.400 SO $116.400 SO SO 10 SO
To1llo 1200,400 SO 1200,400 SO SO 10 SO
".
--i
--i
"-.... ".
". ('")
--i ~ :J:
--i ;;::
". I"T1
~ ::z
('") --i
:J:
;;:: ~ ""
I"T1 ...,
::z
--i ~ I
'"
""
...,
I
'"
28
02-Aug-94 (95TFF.CIP)
CTIY OF CHUl.A VISTA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
AOOP'ffiD FIVE YEAR PlAN
FY9419S lliROUGH FY98/99
B 1RAPP1C IMPROVEMENTS
PIT # PR0lECT1TI1E ....ject F1l1Idinc Appropriatrd Fundi. .......NEW APPROPRIATIONS PROPOiEo-....
Tollll So..... 111.. PR'Viously FY9419S FY9S196 FY96/97 FY91198 FY~199 Project Complelioo
FY9419S Appropria1ed Adopled Proposed Proposed Proposed Pro...... Authorized Oal< CollUll<Dfs
FtTIlJRE PROJECTS
11'222 Countty Club Drive Meciaas $13,000 RCT SO SO SO S13,OOO SO SO SO
1F'J09 TrarfteSipUppacles $216,000 SIGNAL SO SO SO $106,000 SIIO,OOO SO SO Pbased
PlaasesJV.V
TP910 Mast Ann Mounted Slm'1 SIOII,4OO OAST AX SO SO SO S27,I00 S27,IOO $21,100 $21,100 Pbased
Si<<n PlOItam
TOTALS
3 Fuhlrt' Projects $391,400 SO SO SO $206.100 S137,100 121,100 S27,IOO
FUNDING SUMMARY SIGNAL SO SO SO $106.000 SIIO,OOO SO SO
f1.JTIJRE PROJECTS GAST AX SO SO SO $27,100 127,100 527.100 S27.100
RCT SO SO SO S13,OOO SO SO SO
Tolllls SO SO SO $206,100 S137,I00 $21.100 $21,100
........ ................................ ........... ............................. ......................... ........... ........... ........... ........... ............ ............
FUNDING SUMMARY ASSESS SI00,OOO Sloo.ooo SO SO SO SO SO
All Projects in Group n DIFJRANS _,600 $153.100 S91.soo SO SO SO SO
~ GASTAX S'U,OOO $94,000 SO S27,I00 127.100 S27,IOO S27,IOO
SIGNAL S187.200 1395,100 $392,100 SI06,OOO $110,000 SO SO
""J:J RDAOTAY SI9.300 $09.300 SO SO SO SO SO
~ CALTRANS SS46,SOO S162,000 SJU.soo SO SO SO SO
GRANT $116,400 SO $116,_ SO SO SO SO
'-tl RCT SO SO SO S13,OOO SO SO SO
"V5 16 TOTAL PROJECTS $612,400 TolIls S2,078,OOO SI,093.soo _.soo S206.100 SI37,I00 S27.100 S27,IOO
in Group n
........ ................................ ........................................ ......................... ...................... ........... ....................... ............ ....................................
".
--l
--l
".
n
::J:
3:
....
:z
--l
""
....
I
....
".
--l
--l
".
n
::J:
:;:
....
:z
--l
""
....
I
....
02-Aug-94(C:\QPRO\95DRF.C1P)
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
C^PITALJMPROVE~ PROGRAM
ADOPTED FIVE YEAR PLAN
FYt993194 throuth FYI993199
IV DRAINAGE IMPROVEMEmS
prr# PROJOCTTI1LE Project Fun<Iinc Appropriated Fundinc AnticipaRd
To'" So..... Thru Prmously FYW>5 FY95196 FY96197 FY91m FY9lII99 Project Completion
FY94J9S Appropriated Adopted Propo.... Proposed Proposed Propo5led Authorized 0...
NEW PROJECr.;
DRII9 11M. <Jau&es $03,000 SlORMFEE S10.500 SO S10.500 S21.ooo $21.000 S10.500 SO FY95
ORIn Tel<ppb CoB,.. Clwmel SIOO.ooo owrcYN SI00.ooo SO $100.000 SO SO so so FY9S
Pha..1 o..;p-FIII8I
1UTAlS
2 NEW PROJECr.; $163,000 S1I0.500 so SIIO.500 521,000 $21.000 SIO.500 so
'---
~ FUNDING SUMMARY owrcVN $100,000 so SI00.ooo so so SO SO
~ NEWPR~ STORMFEE S10.500 so $10.500 $21.000 $21.000 $10,500 SO
To.... 5t 10.500 so S1I0.500 521,000 $21,000 SIO.500 SO
~ FtmJRE PROJECr.;
DRI21 Reinsua r.rt Drainance S26,OOO RCT so SO so S13.ooo so SO so
Chalmd SlORMFEE so so so $13.000 so SO so
DR905 IJrain8&e ImpftWelMDtI . 1465,000 UNSPEC SO SO so SO so so 1<65.000
Nordl Broadway BasiD
DR908 Dra~ ImpKW'elDellll- S260,ooo RCT SO so so S260,ooo so so SO
G St~d. 2nd wlo ~lmar
DR909 _ _ HiD..,.. T..... S068.ooo GASTAX SO SO so so SO S068.ooo SO
DR925 0Iain0&0 Imp...........- S271.IOO COHO SO SO so SO S271.IOO SO so
Tobiao.WwHiU..,4G1enhowa
> >
-I DR931 0Iain0&0 Imp........... . S204.500 CDBO SO so SO SO so SO S204.500 -I
, -I Oxford. 1st to 2nd -I
> >
n n
:J: 1UTAlS :J:
3: . FtmJRE PROJECr.; SI.1OO,600 SO so so S2M.OOO sm.lOIl s.6ll.ooo $669.500 3:
,." ,."
:z :z
-I -I
"" ""
..... .....
I I
00 00
33
2O-J.I-94 (C,\QPRO\9SPSP.CIp)
CITYOPCHULA YlSTA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMEllTS PROGRAM
ADOI'IED FIVE YEAR PLAN
fY I99<119S11IROUGH FY 1_
VII PUBUCSAPETY 1MPR0VI!MI!IlB
PJT" PR0JECT1TILE ""Jed PlIllIIiIII Apprup. F_.. ....... NEW APPROPRlA11ONS PROPOSED ....... Anticipoted Conmomts
T.... - Th.. PmOOusIy fY 94I9S FY'SI96 FY 96191 FY9119ll FY_ ProJed Completion
fY"/9S Appropria.ed AcIopled PropoKd PropoKd PropoKd PropoKd AU1horized Da..
CURRENT PROJEC1'S
PSII2 1'".. TrainiOC Pacillly . 1324.130 DIPFlRl! SII1.980 SII1.980 10 10 10 10 10 FY.I Releale 0( r._
EadHot......Ranchero DIPRElMIl S206,ISO S206,ISO 10 10 10 10 10 10 c::oned proir
PStl4 _1-_ S21,500 RCT $22.430 S16.100 16.330 10 10 10 10 FY93 FY94I9S S1,500 .....1...... to PSI3S
DlPFIRE SS,01O 10 SS.01O 10 10 10 10 10 rand ..fety item
PSlU _Sal..,. SI,.l42,llOO DIFPOLCE S2S3.8llO S1J3.8llO 10 10 10 10 10 FY.I FY 94I9S
eommanications
PSI30 Radio c....1~Uljl..~livM S40.llOO DIFPlRE S40.llOO S40.llOO 10 10 10 10 10 FY93
T_ and Equipmeot
PSI3I V.__SptoIro $35,000 RCT S3S,llOO S3S.llOO 10 SO SO SO 10 FY93
Fift Statio.. #2_'S
PSt35 V.- Ea_Systems- 135.000 RCT S3S,llOO S3S.llOO 10 10 10 SO 10 FY94
Slationl344
T.....
6 Cllfmlt Pro;edI SI,803,630 S145.430 $134.0J0 SII..uo 10 10 10 SO 1 ProJed Propooed lor _.....1 Iunclin~
"'- F....in&Suoomaty DIPFlRE S163.050 SI51.9IO SS.cno 10 10 10 10
~ D1FRElMB S206,ISO S206,ISO 10 10 10 10 SO
~ D1FPOUCE S:I!3.8llO S:I!3.llOO 10 10 SO 10 SO
RCT S92,'30 136.100 S6,3JO SO SO SO SO
T..... S145.430 $134,030 SII..uo SO SO SO SO
~ NEW PROJEC1'S
NONE
:>>
-I
-I
:>> :>>
-I n
-I FUIlJRE PROJEC1'S :J:
:>> 3:
Q PSI20 I"T1
New Fire Stat_ $OSI.340 DIPFlRl! 10 10 10 16S1,.l4O SO SO 10 FY92 :z
3: EasI H A Paseo RanchelO -I
I"T1 ""
:z
-I 1'5126 ......
'mnnrnt Fire Station .6- $643."S D1FPlRE SO SO 10 10 SO $643.105 10 I
"" Sail Creek \!)
......
I
\!)
)
2O-Jul-94 (C:\QPRO\95PSP_CIP)
CITY OP CHULA VISTA
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM
AOOPreD FIVE YEAR PLAN
FY I......S llIROUGH FY 1_
VII PUBLIC SAFETY IMPROVEMENl'S
PIT # PROIECTTTlLE Project FaMlift& Approp. Fundinc ....... NEW APPRQPRlA110NS PROPOSED ....... Anticipated Comments
T.... - Th.. -...ly FY'l4I9S FY9S/96 FY 96191 FY 91/93 FY_ Project Completion
FY.....S Appropriated Adopted ............ ............ Propoo<d Propoo<<! AU1horized Date
PSt:!7 File Tninint PaCIlity- S231,sl1O DIFFIRE 10 10 10 SI41,2lIO 10 10 10
Oaaroom D1FREIMB 10 10 10 SU,300 10 10 10
PSI29 p~ StItioa - Sunbow SSSf,S40 DEVElDPER 10 10 10 10 SSS<,s40 10 10
PSI34 _1Uz.....,uAlion S123,345 DEVEIDPER 10 10 10 10 S223,34S 10 10
PSI" PO Locker ROOIII SS4,SOO DIPPOLCE 10 10 10 SI9,)OO 10 10 10
Rmovation GFCAPOUT 10 10 10 $3S,OOO 10 10 10
PSt4S F"ftSlatiotlS-- SS94,41S Ref 10 10 10 10 10 SS94,41S 10
RepIooomml
Totall
I F.fUR Projects S2,9S3,S2S 10 SO 10 S931,41l1 sm,oas SI,238.220 SO
'" Fundinl s.nn-, DIPFIRE SO 10 10 S19I,61l1 10 S643,1IOS 10
'..() D1FREIMB 10 10 SO - 10 10 10
\ DEVELOPER SO 10 SO 10 sm,MS 10 SO
N GFCAPOUT 10 SO SO SlS,OOO 10 10 10
~ Ref 10 10 10 10 10 SS94,41S SO
}.J DIPPOLCE 10 10 10 SI9,)OO 10 SO 10
Totall 10 SO 10 S931,41l1 Sm,MS SI,238.220 10
........................................................................... ............... ........... ........... ........... .......... .......... ........... ........... .............................
F....... Sam....,.
An Projects in Groap VII
Ref S92,430 S86,100 S6,33O 10 10 SS94,41S 10
DEVElDPER 10 10 10 SO sm,oas SO SO
DIPFIRE SI63,OSO SIS1,9IO SS,01O S19I,61l1 SO S643,IOS SO
D1FPOLCE S2I.l,IOO S2I.l,1OO SO SI9,)OO SO SO SO
D1FREIMB S206,ISO $206,150 SO - SO SO SO
GFCAPOUT SO SO SO $3S,OOO SO SO SO
S14S,43O $134,030 SII,400 1937,420 sm,oaS SI,238.220 10
:J>
-t
-t
:J>
n
:x:
:;<
,..,
Z
-t
""
....,
I
....
o
14 Total PIojodI
hi Group VII
........................................................................... ............... ........... ........... ........... .......... .......... ........... ........... .............................
41
:J>
-t
-t
:J>
n
:x:
:;<
,..,
:z
-t
""
....,
1
....
o
2IJ.JaI-94(9S<lGP.cip)
~OPOfULA VISTA
CAP1TALIMPROVEMENTPROORAM
ADOPTED FIVE YEAR PLAN
FY94I95 _ py_
vm Gl!NI!RALllOYI!RNMI!NT1MPROYIlM1!Im
.IU PR0.JI!Cf1TlU! - - "- - ........NEW APPROPRIA'I1ONS PROPOSe[)"..... ............ eo-nu
T.... ....... ThN .......... fY>4." fY9S... ......, PYY7." fY9O... ....,... """"""'"
PY9<'9S ......... ........ .- - - - """"""'" 00..
CIJRREIlr PR01ECIS
00104 ~ln(onnMion S2,....... DIfOtS sm.... sm.... 10 10 10 10 10 PYB7
.,..~ SPCSEWIlR 11,165,196 11,ZS1296 113,_ 10 10 10 10
scoor 11$,000 IIS,ODe 10 10 SO SO 10
SIGNAL ItS,. SU.om SO SO 10 SO SO
I RDATCI S30.... S30.... SO SO 10 SO SO
RDAOTAY IIS,OIIO SU,_ .. 10 .. 10 SO
GASfAll Its,OOO IIS,OOO 10 SO .. 10 SO
IlfPl1WlS ....... ....... 10 SO .. SO SO
lRKSEW1!R 1111,000 1111,000 10 10 10 SO SO
001" R__. m..... OPCAPOln' m_ S",_ 10 10 10 10 .. FY08 ""
........-1IIds
00110 lteyAI..octConlnllSyllellt m,... GPCAPOt1I' SI... S,.,... 10 10 10 10 10 FY08 1~" -
rorCilyFxiIitieI Ref 119,_ 119.900 .. 10 SO 10 10
00'21 R " lllolMaiWnme _713 CAI'OI1I' ""... ""... 10 10 10 10 10 .... FY96 1.-....-.........
Coonpol<< Ref 13n.13e $182.9 SI,.".. ...... SO SO SO
DIFMAINP -... S2J7,19J 141,106 SO SO SO ..
COPIIESI!RVIl 10 .. SO ....... 10 SO SO
00'" -- ""... CAI'OI1I' S21." S21.... 10 10 10 10 10 .... -
00'21 ......-- __ llIPPHllNI! sm."" SI...,.. - $12,710 Sf'" Sl.... Sll,SOI py" -
00'29 _"-'"14.... S3....%I IlIPRIlCRD U!,S<O - 10 SlI.3M 131.6.1 10 10 py" FY96 PY9J r..... rer
Ref 1'-'_ I.... 10 10 ""293 .. 10 ...........
IlfPI1WIS Sl.... Sl.... 10 10 .. 10 ..
SPCSEWIlR S21.... S21.... 10 .. .. 10 10
SKlNAL Sl.... Sl.... 10 SO SO SO 10
0013t _.".,.,... V'" It,,,,,,,, scoor SJ,474,ott 13.474,_ 10 10 10 10 10 FY1lt lwo..
IlII'CORP Sl2.'" mus 10 10 10 SO 10
00'. M.wr- Mid-Uf'e _Ref ....,057 ....llS7 10 ""'" 10 10 10 py" "" -.........00121I
- DIFMAINP ""... "". .. S3t.l3< SO 10 10
". ".
-t 001<2 11' , ............. _ DII'CMC - - 10 10 10 10 10 ""
);! -t
IOfJDcndoBWs: -t
n ".
X n
3: 0010 --- S1It,m RDATCII 113," 10 SIJ,Cl 10 10 10 10 "" X
IT1 3:
:z scoor ""<2 u.'<2 10 10 .. 10 10 IT1
-t Ref .. 10 10 S13," 10 10 .. :z
-t
"" ~ GPCAPOt1I' SIJ," SU" .. 10 10 .. 10 ""
...., ""<2 10
I MEI'ER 16,742 10 10 .. 10 ....,
,...... IlfPI1WIS ...m u.m SO 10 10 10 10 I
...... ......
~ DlFFAClL u.m u.,<2 10 10 10 10 10 ......
SPCSEWIlR S'..... 113,.soo .. .. 10 10 10
\::
J 2
i
~~~~
~nt
~~n
15<
i
I
J
H~
d~
if
'1 a
!h
I~la
f~
r
~~1 ;
~..l
~I'll
I ~ -
. M
I
nil
J~U
Ii
h
~ aa aaaaaa aaaa~a a aaaaaa a~
M M M
! aa aaaaaa aaaa~a a aaaaaa a~
Ii Ii
i aa aa~aaa aaa=,a a aaaaaa a=
...", i
!iiM
S aa aailaaa a;o;aJ.~a ~ aaaaalas
~ i ~,,~ !...
:i ;; ~M ;; i
~ aa ialaaa a!aa~a I ~!aaaa a..:
::l : II gof_ i
.. .. :::; tit g
'" n aUgl~ ~un~ I a;~na ~~
~
Ii .. ..~ ":;
il II Ui8UE U~~U I UiilUa Ii
~ U ag~g~;l ofU~ ~~! ofU!g :!l
.. ";;f ""t;
h ~~~;d iun~ ~ dud I
f! ~
; !
r' -
i
III J I
i f 1! H f
o < ..
.. ~
~ ~ 8
l:!
li~;2 ~(
~
a a a a
a a a a
a a II II
a a a a
i i U
.. till....
a a H
; ; II
I I!
~ ~
M M
!
~ f i j
d ! f
u !
"
8
ATTACHMENT #7-12
....
~
ATTACHMENT #7-12
ATTACHMENT #7-13
i
I
J i
I
i
I
.
II! I
II i
i
I
n a a a aaaaaaaaaa!aaaaaaa a a a a ~ I
.. M
In a a a aaaaaaaaaa~aaaaaaa a a a a ~ .
.
.
:l .
.
.
I~J i
a a a aaalilaaaaa!,aaaaaaa a a a a i I
ff~ fi n
~ i
I ~ ~ . aaai;aaaillluaaaaala a i a a i :
iH .
. i
~ . !l U"':l ! 2"
.
. I
M M . ... ...~... ..
.
~z .
.
.
~n a a a . au~alllll~ala!auu i I a I! i .
~Ig~ . .
. .
. .
iu . _ ~~;; ;!!;t .
.
M M M .
.
.
~o~.. .
i .
ff~t .
a a a IUlii;au~~~uual a II! ~ /! !
~~E IH aaa ~a~! ~ ~ta:i:! !;t ~ I i
6E8~ ... ""::f .. i
I
15<
J~~ a a a UI~1j~;aUa!!~'iOual i II! ~ ~ i
i Uau aUMn !~!:i 5;!~;tl ~ i
: :
I :
> :
n i I h!~hln;h~Uin ! ~ i I i
~ I
i
I ~ ~ I i I
fl M i I
I I I
. :
.
. I
i
i
I ~ f ! =
i I j I ~
J~
I
.i i i I H ~ j il Ii I
.: ] d
I ~f i
0 : ..~ /f~..2Cl3 l.. i
N . I
. "
.
!i J:; .
.. .
.
~ ~ 8 8 .
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT #7-13
01- Aug -94 (c:\gpm \95LBF.CI1)
45
n
-4
n
x
a
m
z
V
A
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
CAPITAL IMPROVEb1ENIS PROGRAM
ADOPTED
FIVE YEAR PLAN
FY 1994195
through FY1998/99
-
IX
LIBRARY PROJECTS
PIT#
PROIECI'TTRE
Project Funding
Appropriated
Funding
........ NEW
APPROPRIATIONS PROPOSED ........
Anticipated
Toul Sources
Thru
Previously
FY94M
FY95/96
FY96197
FY97199
FY96I99
Project
Completion
FY94195
Appropriated
Adopted
Proposed
Proposed
Proposed
Proposed
Authorized
Daft
CURRENTPRO]ECIS
LB122
Aubmacd UbrarySystem
5723,413 CISA
$273,402
5173,8"
599 .556
50
SO
50
SO
FY90
FY95196
RCT
169,610
569,610
SO
$27,675
$0
50
50
DIF BRY
5219,676
1179,469
$40,201
553,050
SO
So
SO
C.O.P.RSV
50
SO
m
$60.000
SO
50
50
LB124
New Am library-
$11,133,940 DIFLBRY
56,600
52001000
(5191100)
SO
$1,611,200
59,513,940
m
FY91
FY9607
Saeelwater
L 3125
New Am Library
$15,445,410 OPCAPOUT
5114.5023
5114,500
SO
SO
50
50
50
FY92
FY905
Fourth d Orange
CDBG
53.172,620
52,8W,6%
5291,924
50
50
50
$0
GRANT
56.746,000
$6.748.000
SO
f0
So
50
50
DIFLBRY
52,826785
52.017,785
1609,000
SIM000
51,093,000
5330.505
50
RCT
$67,000
567,000
50
50
So
$0
$0
Tomla
3
Cursentprojecls
527.502,763
513 .520393
512,470,906
51,049,467
51,233,725
52.704,200
59,8".445
50
2
Projeclsproposed
newappropriations
Funding Summry
CISA
5273,402
!173,646
599 .556
50
50
50
50
Current Pro"
RCT
3156,610
5156,610
50
521,675
50
SO
m
V.J
DffLBRY
53,055261
52397,754
5658,1107
$1,146,050
S2,704,200
59,8", 445
f0
C
' GFCAPOIIT
GRANT
$114.500
$6.7 48.000
5114,500
$6,748,000
50
SO
50
50
50
50
50
50
50
$0
CDBG
53, 172,620
52,86,696
5291,924
SO
50
50
50
C.O.P.RSV
SO
f0
$0
560.000
SO
$0
SO
Torah
513.520.393
SI7,470,906
$1A49,487
$1133,725
52.704100
59,8",445
$0
NEW PROJECTS
LB131
Self Cbecko t5yslem
597,000 CLSA
597,000
50
$97.000
50
50
SD
m
FY95
n
Tohb
fnj
I
New Project
f97,000
197.000
10
597,000
30
f0
SO
f0
x
3
M
2
V
1
A
45
n
-4
n
x
a
m
z
V
A
APPENDIX H
,.; .
.
/9r;20?
...1)rrlir'(llrr! 1(1 (lr\1l11\11111ihJ (jnliN
r::>r-~.
ri _ --",
10~95 JAMACHA BOULEVARD, SPRING VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 9\977
TELEPHONE 670.2222, AREA CODE 619
April 28, 1995
Mr. Ed Batchelder
Growth Management Oversight
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
f::A / a::; :,r
PLANt;,/..,:...
commission
Subject: City of Chula vista Growth Management Oversight
Commission (GMOC) 1994 Threshold Standards Review-Water
Dear Mr. Batchelder:
As part of Otay Water District's efforts to assure a high
quality, reliable water supply, the District has completed an
update of its Water Resources Master Plan is projecting a growth
rate similar to the Chula Vista projections.
Our projection does, however, include areas outside the existing
Chula Vista sphere of influence. The following summarize our
projections.
1. For the next 12 months we projected 1,588 meter
sales.
2. For the next five years (1996-2000) we project an
average of 1535 meter sales per year with a peak
of 1863.
The following paragraphs highlight Otay's accomplishments towards
meeting the GMOC threshold Standards.
WATER SUPPLY
The recent rains and snow in California have resulted in many
reservoirs, state wide, to be at or near full and several local
reservoirs to experience spilling. Therefore, the water outlook
for the next 12-18 months is that there will be no restrictions
on water supply.
The long-range prognosis is also very favorable in that the
Metropolitan Water District (MWD) has implemented a water policy
that assures a long term water supply. It is MWD's goal to meet
100% of the water demand 90% of the time and the remaining 10% of
the time meet a minimum of 80% of the demand.
On the regional front, the CWA and individual agencies are
discussing the potential exchange of water between agencies and
/~/;2or
Mr. Ed Batchelder
Growth Management Oversight Commission
City of Chula Vista
April 28, 1995
Page 2
"Wheeling" of water by CWA. This will further increase the
reliability of the long term water supply.
The County Water Authority construction of Pipeline No. '4 is
expected to be completed in early 1996. This pipeline will
substantially increase the treated water delivery capacity to
Otay as well as provide an additional level of reliability, as
there will be a treated water and raw water pipeline coming to
the south County.
rNDEPENDENCE FROM rMPORTED WATER SUPPLY
The Otay Water District is also taking action to enhance the
reliability of water supply through its Integrated Resource
Planning (IRP). The District has established a goal of obtaining
40% of its water supply locally, when CWA aqueducts are out of
service, and 70% from local reservoir storage when CWA aqueducts
are available to replenish the local reservoirs.
As part of the IRP, the District has been negotiating with the
City of San Diego, Sweetwater Authority, and Helix Water District
for treatment plant capacity and lake storage. All have
indicated they are willing to enter into agreements pending Board
and Council approvals. The District is also investigating
recharging programs, wells, desalination of ocean water and
expansion of the recycled water system.
EMERGENCY WATER SUPPLY
CWA continues with their efforts to provide for emergency storage
needs for delivery to their member agencies in the event of
supply outages from MWD deliveries. There are a number of
alternatives they have identified and the various options are
capable of sustaining long term MWD delivery interruptions. They
are also working on agreements with the City of San Diego to
provide CWA Water during outages of the northerly segments of the
Pipeline 3 or 4.
Also, the District continues to make progress in meeting their
goal of maintaining independence, for a minimum of ten continuous
days, from CWA in the event of planned or emergency aqueduct
shutdowns. Negotiations with the City of San Diego for Lower
Otay Reservoir/Treatment capacity for the central and southern
portions of the District and an agreement with Helix for Levy
Treatment Facility capacity for the northern portion of the
District are in progress.
.'
//~..207
Mr. Ed Batchelder
Growth Management oversight commission
City of Chula Vista
April 28, 1995
Page 3
The County Water Authority has been working with the Helix Water
District, Padre Dam Municipal Water District and otay Water
District to increase the Levy Treatment Plant capacity for
increased delivery abilities to otay and Padre Dam. cwA staff is
scheduled to present their recommendation to the CWA Board later
this year.
The District continues the construction of a major 30 MG terminal
reservoir adjacent to EastLake Parkway. This reservoir, should
be completed in late 1995. Due to the failure of one of the
reservoir walls during filling, the project has been delayed.
However, the retrofit of one cell is in progress and should be
available for service by the Summer of 1995. The second cell
should be in service by late 1995. This delay does not create
any problems in meeting the water demands of the area.
The District has under design a project to link storage from Roll
Reservoir in the South to the 30 MG EastLake Greens Reservoir ih
the Central area. This project will deliver 20 MGD to the
Central area in an emergency. Combined with the 30 MG reservoir,
the Central area will have more than a 10 day supply of water for
an emergency through the year 2000.
PLANNING THE WATER SYSTEM
The District has updated its 1991 Draft Water Resources Master
Plan. The basis of the master plan is the population growth
projections from SANDAG, Version 8, and input from developers.
It also incorporated the concepts of water storage and supply
from neighboring water agencies in order to sustain a CWA supply
outage. Otay has been working closely with the Chula Vista City
staff in finalizing the Water Resources Master Plan.
The process of planning followed by the Otay Water District is to
use the Master Plan as a guide and to revisit each year the best
alternatives for providing a reliable water supply. The Master
Plan is also revised every five year through an in-depth review.
Representatives from Sweetwater Authority, Chula Vista City
council and Otay have continued to meet during the past year to
address issues of joint concern as well as keep the City informed
regarding state-wide water issues which may impact development
within Chula vista.
The District continues to have a Water Conservation Program
ordinance to reduce the quantity of water used by customers for
the purpose of conserving water supplies.
"
Jf~;2/tJ
Mr. Ed Batchelder
Growth Management Oversight Commission
city of Chula Vlsta
April 28, 1995
Page 4
RECYCLED WATER
On the reclaimed water front, Otay continues to actively pursue
the development of reclaimed water facilities within new
development projects. The District is fully supportive of the
construction of an advanced wastewater treatment plant in the
Otay River Valley which would provide reclaimed water for their
newly built distribution facilities.
Otay is in the process of evaluating the wastewater and recycled
water system. This will provide data on the best use of the
Ralph W. Chapman Water Recycling Facility and what improvements
are needed to meet recycled water demands in the future. This
effort has been coordinated with the City of Chula Vista,
Sweetwater Authority and the Ci~y of San Diego, in particular
with Chula Vista plans for the Otay River Valley Plant and the
San Diego's South Bay Plant.
COORDINATION BETWEEN CHULA VISTA. OTAY AND SWEETWATER AUTHORITY
There has been significant accomplishments in the coordination
efforts of the three agencies in the last year. Some examples
are:
1.0tay supported Chula Vista's request for a CWA subsidy to
study the Otay River Valley Wastewater Treatment Facility.
2. Shared resources agreement was executed between Sweetwater
Authority and 9tay. Chula Vista, Sweetwater Authority, and
Otay are discussing the possibilities of a three-way
agreement.
3. Coordination on Chula Vista's Sphere of Influence Study with
Otay identified as the preferred water purveyor and Chula
vista as the preferred wastewater treatment provider.
4. Sweetwater Authority and Otay are jointly investigating
opportunities to develop local water supplies and share water
resources. These include such projects as: The San Diego
Formation investigation, the Middle Sweetwater River Study,
and evaluation of multiple interconnections.
5. Chula Vista, Sweetwater Authority, and Otay are sharing
information and data needed to develop Geographical
Information Systems that will enhance all the agencies
operations.
/ ~" J//
--..
Mr. Ed Batchelder
Growth Management oversight commission
City of Chula Vista
April 28, 1995
Page 5
6. Continued meeting and issue resolutions by the Interagency
Water Task Force.
HIGHLIGHTS OF OTAY WATER DISTRICT'S OPERATION
The following are a few highlights of the 1993-1994
accomplishments by Otay.
1. No water rate increase associated with otay operations.
2. Well drilled on 30 MG Reservoir, EastLake Greens site, that
may yield 40 GPM. otay is evaluating the benefit/cost of
placing the well in service.
3. $18.5 million in capital improvements designed and/or
constructed.
4. Installed and inspected approximately 95,414 LF of pipelines.
5. Developers installed approximately $7 million in pipelines.
6. Delivered approximately 21,000 acre feet of water.
7. Delivered approximately 750 acre feet of recycled water.
8. During the period July 1993 to June 1994 Otay sold 814 meters,
up from last years meter sales of 560.
I will attend th~ May 4th, 1995 meeting and make a brief
presentation.
Very truly yours,
TNS/mds
19-~/~
SWEETWATER AUTHORIT.
505 GARRETT AVENUE
POST OFFICE BOX :1328
CHULA VISTA. CAe r ')RNIA 91912.2328
(619) 4;;(...1413
FAX 1619) 426-7469
GOVERNING BOARD
April 27, 1995
BUD POCKLlNGTON, CHAIRM....N
GEORGE M WATERS. VICE CHAIRMAN
SUE JARRETT
EDWIN J STEEl.E
MARGAAET A WELSH
JAMES 5 WOLNlEW1CZ
CARl( F. WRIGHT
WANOA AVERY
TREASURER
ClAN J REEVES
SECRETA~V."'OMIN1STRATlVE A.IDE
Mr. Ed Batchelder
Senior Planner
city of Chula vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula vista, CA 91910
Subject: 1994 GMOC REPORT - SERVICE AVAILABILITY STATUS
Dear Mr. Batchelder:
This is in response to your request letter dated April 5, 1995 to
provide an evaluation of Sweetwater Authority's ability to
accommodate forecasted growth considering both short and long-term
perspectives.
The San Diego County Water Authority and Metropolitan Water
District continue their efforts to improve the reliability of the
region's water supply system and its ability to weather a repeat of
the 1991 drought situation. Metropolitan Water District has
acquired a large reservoir site in the Domenigoni Valley in
Riverside County for the construction of a reservoir to store
excess water during periods of plentiful supply to the San Diego
region. This will provide for drought or other emergencies, such
as earthquakes. Construction of the second pipeline by the San
Diego County Wat.er Authority to serve the South Bay should be
completed and operational by late 1997. This will provide the
necessary redundancy to minimize interruptions of water supply as
a result of planned or unplanned shutdowns of a one-supply
pipeline.
Partly as a result of the establishment of the Chula vista
Interagency Task Force, Sweetwater Authority and otay Water
District have developed an ad hoc committee to coordinate each
agency's water supply and service activities in Chula vista.
Sweetwater Authority had approximately 53,000 acre feet of water in
storage in Loveland and Sweetwater Reservoirs as of April 24, 1995.
This amount of water is equivalent to approximately 24 months of
imported water supply. Sweetwater Authority does not intend to
purchase imported water for at least the next 18 months. The
expected delivery to consumers for 1995 is 23,500 acre feet for the
12 month period. This represents an 0.4% increase from the
consumption during 1994.
A Public Agency. ) 9 ,. ,). I 3
Serving Na/ioMI City. Chula Vis/o and Surrounding Areas
Mr. Ed Batchelder
Senior Planner
City of Chula vista
Re: 1994 GMOC Report - Service
Availability Status
April 27, 1995
page two
In regards to the 1993 GMOC's report pertaining to water, the
Authority has the following updates for the 1994 report:
1. The Authority has continued to provide information to
consumers regarding water conservation programs and is
maintaining a voluntary conservation status. Changes in
types of landscaping using xeriscape, as well as other
water use changes, have been recommended to our customers
since the origination of our Water Conservation Program.
2. The Authority continues to work closely with staff of the
City of Chula Vista as plans develop for the bayfront.
3. The Authority continues to study a brackish groundwater
desalination project. This project will extract
groundwater from the Lower Sweetwater River. Preliminary
design and an Environmental Impact Report are in progress
for this project.
4.
The Authority continues to investige the
surplus water in groundwater aquifers
injection/extraction wells in the San Diego
storage of
by using
Formation.
5.
A study_
evaluate
capacity
with positive results has been
the feasibility of increasing
of Sweetwater Reservoir.
performed to
the storage
6. Sweetwater Authority does not have plans to distribute
reclaimed water at this time because it does not appear
to have a high probability of becoming available in the
near future. If it were available, we will consider the
potential use of injection into the groundwater aquifer
for recharge for our demineralization facility and
distribution to potential reclaimed water customers.
7. Sweetwater Authority staff continues to work with the San
Diego County Water Authority on the development of a
desalination plant in the South Bay area. However, this
project has been put on hold by the County Water
Authority until further notice.
)9/;2/'1
"
Mr. Ed Batchelder
senior Planner
city of Chula vista
Re: 1994 GMOC Report - Service
Availability Status
April 27, 1995
page three
8. The staff of the Authority and the Otay Water District
have met frequently on sharing of services. An agreement
between the two districts has been executed. Discussions
have also been held on assisting each agency on water
supply to improve each agencys' reliability.
9. Rezoning of older residential communities in Chula vista
to multi-unit housing continues to make existing small
diameter cast iron pipes unable to meet the required fire
flow demands. Sweetwater Authority requests that
consideration be given to this situation when land use
decisions increase demands on the water supply
infrastructure. An improvement in communication between
the project owner, the Planning Department and Sweetwater
Authority has been noted.
10. Sweetwater Authority and Otay Water District are working
through the San Diego County Water Authority to develop
a region-wide "Highly Reliable Water supply Rate"
available for industry. This effort is in response to
the mayor of Chula vista's request for a firm water
supply for new industry. This proposal has been merged
with the city of San Diego's SWAP program (San Diego
Water Availability Plan) which proposes to collect
slightly higher rates to provide funds for water
transfers.
If you have any questions, please contact Mr. Hector Martinez at
420-1413, ext. 613.
very truly yours,
SWEETWATER AUTHORITY
Richard A. Reynolds
General Manager
RAR:HM:ln
pc:
Mr. James L. Smyth, Chief Engineer, Sweetwater Authority
Mr. Hector Martinez, Senior Engineer," "
k:\lorelei\wp51\gooc94.ltr
/'
/9/)J!?
May 18,1995
Mayor Shirley Horton
Members Of City Council
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Ave
Chula Vista CA 91910
I,; ~ .
J.....:: /)
I. '~'" 71"\-
{'/ f
-, :.'\.
Dear Mayor Horton & Council:
It is with pleasure that I have this opportunity to convey to you the Growth Management
Oversight Commissions commendations to the Otay Water District, Sweetwater Authority, and
City Of Chula Vista. Following the GMOC'S review of the water agencies written and verbal
reports it was agreed that the Water Agencies and Cities exemplary progress toward the
'.- assurance of,a guaranteed water supply for Chula Vista and South Bay residents deserved prompt
and special recognition.
As chairman of the Inter-Agency Water Task Force I have had the opportunity to observe City
Staff, and the Directors and Board Representatives from the Water Agencies meeting on a
monthly basis to plan, and develop strategies for immediate and long range water delivery
services to the South Bay. The communication, straightforWard negotiating and sincere effort
by City and Water Agency Staff to achieve common goals has been exceptional.
The Boards of Directors for the two Agencies are to be commended as they in conjunction with
their agency staffs have made significant progress in achieving a guaranteed water supply to
meet anticipated community growth as well as emergency interruptions due to earthquakes ete..
The GMOC was impressed with th~ long range outlook and spirit of cooperation that is evident
between local agencies, San Diego Water Authority, and the Metropolitan Water Authority. The
following illustrate the basis for the GMOC'S commendations.
Domenlgonl Reservoir: MWD began construction today for this major reservoir near Hemet
that is projected to be completed in 1999. This reservoir will increase the water storage
capacity for direct delivery to San Diego by over 400% to assure the availability of water to
San Diego in times of drought, earthquakes and other emergencies.
Second Pipe Line: A second pipe line is under construction, to be completed in 1997, to
deliver water to the South Bay that will negate water supply interruptions as a result of planned
or unplanned shutdowns.
Conservation Programs: The Water Agencies have an ongoing water conservation education
program for water users.
Desalination Project: The design and environmental impact reports are in progress for a
brackish ground water desalination project which will help to provide less dependency on
imported water.
Sweetwater Reservoir Storage: A feasibility study is in progress to increase the capacity
/9/;2/~
of the Sweetwater Reservoir. The increased
storage will help to provide less dependency on imported water.
Desalination Plant In the South Bay: Water Agency Staff continue to work in cooperation
with the San Diego County Authority on the development of a desalination plant in the South Bay
area.
Agency Agreement: The Water Agencies have developed agreements to share services to
increase reliability of water services. Connecting pipelines provide the ability to move water
as necessary from one agency to another.
Highly Reliable Water Supply For Business & Industry: Water Agencies are working
with the San Diego County Water Authority to develop a region wide "Highly Reliable Water
Supply and Rate" for Business and Industry. This was in response to a request from the Mayor
of Chula Vista.
Assured Water Supply: Metropolitan Water District has implemented a water policy to
assure 100% of water supply demand 90% of the time.
t \~\,\l~ [Ten Continuous Days of Water Supply: Through increased storage such as the Eastlake
~ :~,,~ Parkway Reservoir and agency agreements this goal is very close to baing realized. Agencies are
V~~ continuing to work toward the goal. . .
~~ Water Resources Master Plan: Agencies and City Staff are utilizing Sandag and Developer
projections to develop a Water Resources Master Plan. The Master Plan will be revisited on an
annual basis as well as in depth every 5 years.
As consumers we expect that an abundent supply of water will always ba available to us at very
little cost. Seldom do we take the time to realize thar we live in a semi-arid region and that we
are dependent on water from Northem California and the Colorado River to meet our needs. We
are fortunate that the City of Chula Vista, The Sweetwater Authority, and Olay Water District
are exploring all available alternatives to provide an uninterrupted water supply to South Bay
Residents at resonable rates.
~'JV
IAc..S l-niJ:.~~M {~
Tris E Hubbard. Chair ~OC
CC Richard Reynolds, General Manager, Sweetwater Authority
Keith Lewinger, General Manager, Olay Water District
Jc;-cl-J :;
APPENDIX I
;9/c2 JY .
Chula Vista Elementary School District
Planning Department
MEMORANDUM
DATE: April 28, 1995
TO: Chula Vista Growth Management Oversight Commission
FROM: Chula Vista Elementary School District
RE: SCHOOL THRESHOLD REPORT - RESPONSE TO CITY'S 12 -18 MONTH
GROWTH FORECAST
RESPONSE TO CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS ON 1993 ANNUAL REPORT
Last year the Growth Management Oversight Commission (GMOC) recommended, and
the City Council made the finding, that the Chula Vista Elementary School District was
in compliance with the City's Threshold for Schools. The following issues/situations
discussed in the Council's report continue to be relevant this year:
1. Most schools west of 1-805 are operating at or above permanent capacity.
2. The District will continue to accommodate enrollment increases in these areas
through a combination of relocatable classrooms, classroom reconfiguration and
busing.
3. As of April 27, 1995, a total of 584 children throughout the District were being
overflow bused.
4. Enrollment increases east of 1-805 resulting from new development are
anticipated to be met through new construction and expansion of existing
facilities (addition of relocatable classrooms) which will be funded by homeowner
paid Mello-Roos assessments or other full reimbursement financing mechanism.
5. Indirect impacts on student enrollment from non-residential development
continue to be an issue. The joint Chula Vista Elementary School District,
Sweetwater Union High School District, and City study being conducted by
SourcePoint is expected to identify and quantify these impacts. This study will
hopefully be completed in mid. late 1995, and presented to all governing bodies
for action. The findings of the study will be used as a basis for developing
appropriate and equitable mitigation strategies.
Ji - J/ I
GMOC 94
Page 2
6. Full mitigation for all impacts of the Bayfront project (both residential and non-
residential) are essential and should be provided in the form of City conditions of
approval. The District anticipates expanding existing schools in western Chula
Vista, particularly Feaster School, to accommodate children from the Bayfront
project.
7. The District is still interested in acquiring the vacant land adjacent to Feaster
School for expansion of that facility. Lack of funding continues to be the obstacle
to achieving this.
8. The District continues a variety of ongoing activities to plan proactively for growth
and improvement of school facilities. These activities include
a) development tracking and phasing monitoring; b} school growth planning; c}
boundary/attendance area adjustments; d} residency verification; e) requests for
city assistance in obtaining full mitigation; f) responses to notices of proposed
development with recommended mitigation; g) participation in the State
Modernization Program; and h) assuring that all new development fully mitigates
its impacts on school facilities.
9. The District continues to explore creative methods to accommodate
overcrowding including implementation of year-round multi-track schedules.
However, the Board currently is not pursuing this method as indications are that
multi-track does not have community support.
Several items discussed in last year's report have failed to materialize. These are:
1. Anticipated legislation to revamp and simplify the State School Construction
Program. No legislation to this effect was passed. It was anticipated that
passage would increase the District's eligibility for State assistance by
eliminating the incentive for multi-track programs.
2. Elimination of District-owned relocatable classrooms from State funding eligibility
calculations. It was reported that owned relocatable classrooms 20 years old or
more no longer counted in calculating eligibility for State funding. This is true
only if the buildings are removed and not replaced. Therefore, the District's
67+/- buildings 20 years old or more that remain in use will still count against the
District in calculating eligibility.
3. Follow-up legislation to Proposition 170. Proposition 170 would have reduced
the required vote for general obligation bonds to a simple majority. After its
failure in 1993, it was anticipated that similar legislation would be introduced and
hopefully passed by the voters in 1994. This did riot occur, and the earliest any
legislation on this subject could be before the voters appears to be 1996. Thus,
school districts' ability to generate funds for school construction at the local level
continues to be severely constrained.
/9/c2;2tJ
GMOC 94
Page 3
RESPONSE TO CITY'S 12 -18 MONTH FORECAST
Proiects Within Sweetwater Authoritv Area
Enrollments in westem Chula Vista continue to increase. Of the 1795 dwelling units
anticipated to reach occupancy between July 1,1994, and December 31,1995,54 are
located in the Sweetwater Authority service area. At the average District-wide student
generation rate of 0.3 students/unit, 16 new students will be generated. Table 1
indicates the number of units and the home schools for these students.
TABLE 1
School
No. Units
New Students
Rice
Misc. Other Units
16
38
54
5
11
16
TOTAL
Even though most schools west of 1-805 are operating at or above permanent capacity,
some space does exist in certain schools at various grade levels. Utilizing various
methods to maximize facilities utilization, such as busing, eliminating non-essential
uses conducted in regular classrooms, reconfiguration of classes, etc., the District will
be able to accommodate these 16 children next year.
Last year the City's projections contained a listing of commercial, industrial and office
construction totaling 3,665,244 square feet, slightly higher than what was reported the
previous year. The fact that this year's report does not contain this information is of
concern to the District. As you are aware, it is the District's position that non-residential
development, along with changing and recycling neighborhoods and demographic
trends, contributes to increases in student enrollment. It would be helpful if non-
residential development projections could be included in the City's annual report so that
their impacts can be quantified and accommodation plans formulated.
Projects Within the Otav Water District Service Area
The District has five Mello-Roos Community Facilities Districts (CFD's) in place, four of
which are project-specific and in Chula Vista's Eastem Territories, the area served by
the Otay Water District. The fifth is a generic district and includes projects throughout
the District. As new large projects are proposed, new CFD's or other full
reimbursement financing mechanisms will be created to finance site acquisition and
needed elementary facilities. It is anticipated that these mechanisms will be
implemented for the following projects: 1) Salt Creek Ranch; 2) Otay Ranch; 3) Rancho
San Miguel; and 4) Otay Mesa (City of San Diego). Miscellaneous smaller projects will
continue to be annexed to CFD No.5.
)fr;2:2!
GMOC 94
Page 4
City projections for this area between July, 1994 - December, 1995, indicate a total of
1741 new dwelling units. At the average District-wide student generation rate of 0.3
students/unit, 522 new students can be expected during the forecast period. Ninety-two
percent of these units are in the EastLake, Rancho del Rey, Salt Creek One, or
Telegraph Canyon Estates (St. Claire) communities, which are within CFD's.
Therefore, financing for new facilities in these areas is in place.
EastLake School serves residents of EastLake and Salt Creek One, and a new school,
Olympicview, is expected to open this year and serve residents of EastLake Greens.
Children from Telegraph Canyon Estates attend Tiffany School, and those from Rancho
del Rey attend Discovery. Last year's forecast which included children from Salt Creek
Ranch has been revised to indicate no units are expected from this project during the
forecast period. When this project moves ahead, it is anticipated that a new CFD, or
other form of full mitigation financing, will be implemented.
RESPONSE TO CITY's 5 . 7 YEAR FORECAST
The City's projections indicate a long-term growth rate ranging from 100 units/year
within the Sweetwater Authority area to 810 - 1510 units/year in the Otay service area,
depending on phasing of the Otay Ranch.
Utilizing the low end figure of 910 total units/year, approximately 11 percent will be
within the Sweetwater Authority service area. Given the overcrowded conditions in
most area schools, we can expect overcrowding to continue and worsen. It is hoped
that the joint study between the school districts and the City will result in a mechanism
which will provide full mitigation for the impacts of this growth.
The remaining 89 percent of the projected units will be in the Otay service area and it is
anticipated that full mitigation for school impacts will be obtained through participation in
Mello-Roos Community Facilities Districts or other full reimbursement funding
mechanism. The City has supported the District in the past in obtaining this mitigation.
DISTRICT ACTIVITIES
Past reports to the GMOC have reported various activities undertaken by the District to
plan proactively for growth and improve school facilities. Among these are 1) the
annual Development Activity Report which tracks proposed and approved projects
within individual school attendance areas and estimates development phasing and
numbers of new students; 2) school growth planning; 3) boundary/attendance area
adjustments; 4) residency verification; 5) requests for City assistance in obtaining
mitigation; 6) District responses to notices of proposed development and recommended
mitigation; and 7) participation in the State Building Program (modernization).
In addition to the above, the District continues to pursue participation in CFD No.5 for
smaller, noncontiguous Pfojects. However, unless the project requires a legislative act
on the part of the City, this participation is voluntary. All project proponents are notified
/9./ J-;2/
GMOC 94
Page 5
of this option in lieu of payment of school fees. Funds collected from CFD No.5 will be
used throughout the District to assist in housing children generated from these projects.
Further, the District has completed a major portion of our Technology Plan. All District
facilities are cabled for local area networks, and the wide area network is operational,
thus expanding access to the excellent educational technology products currently
available. Administrative functions are also being automated and streamlined.
The following events have affected or will affect the District's ability to finance
modernization and construction of new facilities in the future:
1. School Building Program (modernization)
The District received Phase III (construction) approval from the State in 1994, for
modernizing eleven of our oldest schools. The approval was given with a "zero
apportionment" since the State is effectively out of money for building schools. Due to
the failure of the Legislature to put a school bond measure on the ballot in November,
1994, these projects remain ready to go, but unfunded. The general consensus among
the school community is that the earliest time a new bond measure could be put on the
ballot is June, 1996. Given the electorate's negative responses to bonds in general, it
is not certain a school bond will receive the necessary 2/3 vote. The District will
continue to explore all options for modernizing, reconstructing and expanding our
schools.
2. Senate Bill 1066
A bill limiting the amount that school districts can collect as mitigation from residential
development has been approved by the Senate Education Committee and is
proceeding through the Legislature. SB 1066 basically eliminates the
"Mira/Hart/Murrietta" authority which permits districts to collect additional (full) mitigation
above the statutory maximum (currently $1.72/square foot residential, $0.28/square foot
non-residential) if the associated project requires a legislative action. As a trade-off for
eliminating Mira, SB 1066 proposes to increase the statutory cap on residential
development to $2.72/square foot. However, a recent Schools Legal Defense
Association survey found the cost of full mitigation to be approximately $5.67/square
foot. Should this bill be successful, it, combined with 1) the fact that the State is out of
money for building/remodeling schools; and 2) the fact that the Legislature has failed to
place a measure on the ballot lowering the voting requirement from 2/3 to a simple
majority which would assist schools in raising money locally, makes the picture for
maintaining/modernizing our schools and providing facilities to serve new students
extremely bleak.
/ J/ ;2;2J
GMOC 94
Page 6
CITY ACTIVITIES
District and City staffs continue to work on a joint school mitigation study with
Sweetwater Union High School staff. The study is being conducted by SourcePoint
(SANDAG) and will identify and quantify impacts of both residential and non-residential
development on school facilities. Upon completion of this study, and based on the
findings, it is anticipated that the City Council and Boards of Education will jointly
consider an equitable method for providing full mitigation for development's impacts on
schools.
In the interest of compliance with the City's Threshold for Schools, and assuring that
adequate school facilities are available to all children in Chula Vista, the City's
assistance in opposing SB 1066 is requested. Should this bill become law, neither the
City nor the District will have the authority to require new development to pay more than
approximately 1/4 of its fair share for required facilities.
In addition, the City's support for legislation lowering the general obligation bond voting
requirement from 2/3 to a simple majority would be of great assistance to the District in
its efforts to ensure that adequate school facilities are available.
Finally, it appears that the report to the GMOC on schools is about one year behind.
This year's projection period begins in July, 1994, and ends in December, 1995,
effectively only projecting for six+ months. The 5 - 7 year projections are too general to
be of value to the District on a site-specific basis. It would be more useful to the District
if the report and our response were produced at the beginning of the forecast period.
KS:dp
gmoc2.doc
/c;~).)(
APPENDIX J
---
/~/;2;2>
t,
CITY OF CHULA VISTA GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN
1994 TRAFFIC MONITOlUNG PROGRAM
FINAL REPORT
,.
March 2, 1995
/9 --22&
TABLE OF CONTENTS
bSm
Project Background
1
Report Organization
Arterial Level of Service
2
7
8
Project Methodology
Arterial Segment Classifications
8
Summary of 1992 TMP Study Results
(PM Period)
Summary of 1993 TMP Study Results
(AM Period)
9
17
1994 TMP Study Results and Analysis
(Mid-Day Period)
29
Arterial Interchange Segments
(1994 TMP)
38
Conclusions and Recommendations
44
Appendix A
Traffic Monitoring Program Segment LOS
(All Time Periods)
Appendix B
February 1995 Study
Otay Lakes Rd. (E. H st. to Telegraph Canyon Rd.)
Northbound LOS from 3 PM to 7 PM
/9~..2J?
Fiaure
1
2
3
4
Table
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
LIST OF FIGURES
~
1992 TMP Arterial Network and
Segment Classification Map
6
1992 TMP Arterial Segment
Levels of Service (PM Period)
1S
1993 TMP Arterial Segment
Levels of Service (AM Period)
2S
1994 TMP Arterial Segment
Levels of Service (Mid-Day Period)
37
LIST OF TABLES
~
City of Chula Vista Growth Management Plan
Revised Traffic Element
3
Arterial Segment Classification Factors
7
1992 TMP Arterial Performance (PM Period)
9
10
1992 TMP Arterial Segment LOS (PM Period)
1992 TMP Arterial Interchange Segment
Performance (PM Period)
16
17
1993 TMP Arterial Performance (AM Period)
Arterial Segment LOS Comparison
1992 vs. 1993 (PM Period)
1993 TMP Arterial Segment LOS (AM Period)
1993 TMP Arterial Interchange Segment
Performance (AM Period)
18
20
27
1993 TMP Arterial Interchange Segment
LOS Comparison 1992 vs. 1993 (PM Period)
1994 TMP Arterial Performance
(Mid-day Period)
28
29
Arterial Segment LOS Comparison
1993 vs. 1994 (AM Period)
30
J9~,;2ff
.'
(
LIST OF TABLES (Cont.)
Table
Paqe,
13
Arterial Segment LOS Comparison
1993 vs. 1994 (PM Period)
31
14
1994 TMP Arterial Segment LOS
(Mid-day Period)
33
39
15
Arterial Interchange Segment Listing
16
1994 TMP Arterial Interchange Segment
LOS (Mid-day Period)
40
17
1994 TMP Arterial Interchange Segment
Performance (Mid-day Period)
41
18
1994 TMP Arterial Interchange Segment
LOS Comparison 1993 vs. 1994 (AM Period)
42
19
1994 TMP Arterial Interchange Segment
LOS Comparison 1993 vs. 1994 (PM Period)
43
(C:\SM\94TMP\94TMPFR1.00c)
/9/..2:2;
<'
(
1994 TRAFFIC MONITORING PROGRAM
. FINAL REPORT
PROJECT BACKGROUND
In 1988 the City of Chula Vista adopted a Growth Management Plan
to assist the City in assessing the environmental, fiscal and
operational impacts of proposed land development. One of the
elements included in this plan was the Traffic Element which
specified threshold standards for acceptable Levels of Service at
signalized intersections,
Traffic Monitoring Program (TMP) studies conducted in 1989 and
1990 determined the then current operating condition of all
existing signalized intersections in the City and compared them
to the adopted Threshold Standards. In 1991, the Traffic Element
of the Growth Management Plan was revised to conform to the 1985
Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology for determining
arterial Level of Service (LOS) based on average travel speed.
This revised Traffic Element (presented in Table 1) forms the
basis for the Traffic. Monitoring Program which the City now
performs annually.
(
In 1992, the first comprehensive system-wide travel time study
was conducted. As part of this study, each arterial segment in
the City was checked to assess existing conditions in the field
and a revised Arterial Network and Segment Classification Map was
approved for use with future TMP studies. This Classification
Map, referred to in the Traffic Element as "the attached graphic"
(shown in Figure 1), has been used as the basis of this year's
1994 Traffic Monitoring Program.
In the 1992 TMP, the City conducted travel time studies for the
evening peak period (4 PM - 6 PM). The 1993 TMP studied the AM
period (7 AM - 9 AM) and restudied those PM period segments which
were found in the 1992 TMP to be operating at LOS C or less.
This year's Traffic Monitoring Program evaluated the Mid-Day peak
period (11: 30 AM - 1: 30 PM) and also restudied those segments
found in the 1993 TMP to be operating at LOS C or less.
This. Final Report will describe the methodology and procedures
invol ved in conducting the 1994 TMP Study and will analyze and
present the results obtained from the field studies performed for
this project. Information summarizing the studies performed in
1992 and 1993 will also be included in this report so that a
complete record of the benchmark data for each of the three time
periods will be provided. .
/1 <) Y/J
7
,
REPORT ORGANIZATION
This report is organized into sections which will present the
following information:
1. Project Background
2. Report Organization
3. Arterial Level of Service
4. Project Methodology
5. Arterial Segment Classifications
6. Summary of 1992 TMP Study Results
7. Summary of 1993 TMP'Study Results
8. 1994 TMP Study Results and Analysis
9. Arterial Interchange Segments
10. Conclusions and Recommendations
I
.
/7'-'.25/
./
Table 1
(
CITY OF CHULA VISTA GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN
REVISED TRAFFIC ELEMENT - MAY 1991
GOALS
* To provide and maintain a safe and efficient street system
within the City of Chula Vista.
* To establish a performance measurement methodoiogy enabling
the City to accurately determine existing Levels of Service
for motorists.
* To define a Level of Service (LOS) value that represents a
high quality of traffic flow under constrained operating
conditions during peak periods of traffic activity.
* To establish a performance standard which is consistent with
the Regional Growth Management Standards.
*
To maintain consistency
previous Intersection
methodology.
OBJECTIVES
in terms of LOS ratings with the
Capacity Utilization (ICU)
(
1.
Ensure timely provision of adequate local circulation system
capaci ty in response to planned growth, maintaining
acceptable Levels of Service.
2. Plan new roadway segments and signalized intersections to
maintain acceptable standards at build-out of the General
Plan Circulation Element.
THRESHOLD STANDARDS
* City-wide: Maintain LOS "c" or. better as measured by
observed average travel speed on all signalized arterial
segments except that during peak hours LOS "0" can occur for
no more than any two hours of the day.
* West of 1-805: Those signalized arterial segments which do
not meet the standard above, may continue to operate at
their current (Year 1991) LOS, but shall not worsen.
Notes to Standards
* Arterial segment LOS measurements shall be for the
average weekday peak hours, excluding seasonal and
special circumstance variations.
* Urban and suburban arterials are defined as surface
highways having signal spacing of less than two miles
with average weekday traffic volumes greater than
10,000 vehicles per day.
/'
J'},;2] 2-
Table 1 (Cont.)
* Arterial segments are stratified into the following
three classifications as shown on the attached graphic:
Class I arterials are roadways where free flow traffic
speeds range between 35 mph and 45 mph and the number
of signalized intersections per mile are less than
four. There is no parking and there is generally no
access to abutting property.
Class II arterials are roadways where free flow traffic
speeds range between 30 mph and 35 mph, the number of
signalized intersections per mile range between four
and eight, there is some parking and access to abutting
properties is limited.
Class III arterials are roadways where free flow
traffic speeds range between 25 mph and 35 mph and the
number of signalized intersections per mile are closely
spaced. There is substantial parking and access to
abutting property is unrestricted.
* The LOS measurements of arterial segments at freeway
ramps shall be a growth management consideration. in
situations where proposed developments have a
significant impact at interchanges.
* Circulation improvements should be implemented prior to
anticipated deterioration of LOS below established
standards.
* The criteria for calculating arterial LOS and defining
arterial lengths and classifications shall follow the
procedures detailed in Chapter 11 of the 1985 Highway
Capacity Manual (HCM) and shall be confirmed by the
City Traffic Engineer.
* During the conduct of future Traffic Monitoring Program
(TMP) traffic field surveys, intersections experiencing
significant delays will be identified. The information
generated by the field surveys will be used to
determine possible signal timing changes, geometric
and/or traffic operational improvements for the purpose
of reducing intersection delay.
~ /7/;1}}
Table 1 (Cont.)
(
*
Level of Service values for arterial segments shall be
based on the following table:
Level of Service Averaqe Travel Soeed (MPH)
Class 1 Class 2 Class 3
A 1.35 1.30 1.25
B 1.28 1.24 1.19
C 1.22 1.18 1.13
D 1.17 1.14 1. 9
E 1.13 1.10 1. 7
F <13 <10 < 7
Source: Highway.Capacity Manual, Special Report 209,
Transportation Research Board, National Research
Council, Washington, D.C., 1985.
Zmnlementation Measures
* Should the Growth Management Oversight Commission
(GMOC) determine that the Threshold Standard is not
being satisfied, then the City Council shall, within 60
days of the GMOC's report, schedule and hold a public
hearing for the purpose of adopting a moratorium on the
acceptance of new tentative map applications based on
all of the following criteria:
1. That the moratorium is limited to an area wherein
a causal relationship to the problem has been
established; and,
2. That the moratorium provides a mitigation measure
to a specifically identified impact.
-/ /'~c2;J(
"-
~
~
~
'\
~
~
1
~
~
to
.
,\
. ~ (J 'P.
,. 1 s ~ ~
o ,. to
\ \ ~
~
'..
1
~
"FA
..
"
r
l.
! ~
p
v
.. S" o.
f ~1
o S1
.. ~1
, ~1
J ~1 .....
.,. ~1
~1
\.
.,ps~ ~1
~1
.pJ." ":
LEGEND
Arterl.' CI...lflee'Ien_
".
\
_._._ C....,
............... c.... II
_ _ _ _ _ CI... II'
..,,,.,. Ce' '.eter.
Arteria' Ano',.'.
e:.. ~ "......,. Sectlo"
~1
..-,1" .
IM'N ST
.-......
OlAV "Allll'
t..
toO
_.
.un,..
City of Chula VI.ta Growth Monave.ent Plan
Vear 1992 Traffic Monltorlnv Provra.
Arterial Network and 5ev.ent Cla..lflcatlon Map
FiCJUre 1
ARTERIAL LEVEL OF SERVICE
(
The 1994 Traffic Monitoring Program was designed to evaluate
arterial LOS as defined in the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM).
The 1985 HCM uses arterial LOS, which is based on the average
travel speed of through-vehicles on the segment, as the basic
measure of effectiveness used to describe the operating
performance of arterial segments. Average travel speed is
calculated from the running time on the arterial segment and the
intersection approach delay. On any given segment, factors such
as arterial classification, side friction (due to parking and
driveways), signal density (the number of signals per mile),
signal timing and progression, and traffic flow can substantially
affect arterial LOS.
(
The Highway Capacity Manual classifies arterial Level of Service
into six categories, LOS A through F, with LOS A being the best
quality of service and LOS F the poorest. These arterial Level
of Service definitions have been incorporated into the Revised
Traffic Element of the Growth Management Plan and are shown in
Table 1. It should be noted, however, that the LOS definitions
shown in this table vary with the classification of the arterial.
The lesser the arterial classification (i.e., the higher the
class number) the lower the speed that is associated with a given
Level of Service. Therefore, a Class III arterial provides LOS C
at a lower average travel speed than does a Class I arterial.
In order to evaluate Level of Service for any given segment, the
classification of that arterial segment must first be determined.
These arterial classifications are functional in nature and, as
defined in the Revised Traffic Element of the Growth Management
Plan, are summarized in Table 2.
Table 2
ARTERIAL SEGMENT CLASSIFICATION FACTORS
Class I Class II Class III
Free Flow Traffic 45 - 35 35 - 30 35 - 25
Speeds
Number of Signals < 4 4 - 8 Closely
per Mile Spaced
Availabili ty of None , Some Substantial
Parking
Access to Abutting Generally Limited Unrestricted
Properties None
/ )1/.2Y~
.
(
PROJECT METHODOLOGY
As part of the 1992 TMP, the arterial network in the City was
determined, each arterial was divided into segments and each
segment was assigned an arterial classification. This arterial
network was the basis for the field studies conducted during the
1994 TMP. Prior to beginning the field data collection for the
1994 study, each arterial segment was evaluated with respect to
the potential impact of proposed construction and/or street
maintenance projects. These factors, in addition to Southwestern
College's school schedule, were taken into consideration when
scheduling the data collection phase of the study.
Because of the labor intensive nature of studies assessing travel
time and travel speed, the 1994 TMP has been limited (city-wide)
to the Mid-Day peak period only (11:30 AM to 1:30 PM). Limited
studies during both the AM and PM peak periods were also
performed to reevaluate those segments found by last year's TMP
to be operating at LOS C or less.
The data collection phase of the Traffic Monitoring Program uses
a special vehicle equipped with a computer which records the
distance traveled for each second of time spent driving a
segment. Subsequent analysis of the field data generates
information on travel time, average speed, cruise speed, number
( of stops, and delay time along the length of the segment on a
directional basis. Each segment evaluated during this year's
program was driven for the entire two hour time period under
study. A sufficient number of runs was done for each direction
of each segment to provide a statistically adequate sample with a
minimum acceptable level of confidence of 80% for arterial
segments within the City limits. Arterial LOS was then evaluated
according to the HCM Level of Service values shown in Table 1.
ARTERXAL SEGMENT CLASSXFXCATXOHS
(
During the 1992 TMP, the arterial network in the City was
determined and 37 arterial segments were designated for study.
Eleven arterial interchange segments were also designated for
study separate from the arterial segments in order to allow the
impact of freeway interchanges on studied arterials to be
evaluated separately from adjacent arterial segments. These
segments were then assigned a classification based on the free
flow speed of the segment, the number of signals per mile, the
availability of parking and the degree of access available to
properties abutting the arterial. These arterial classifications
(Classes X, U and IU) are defined in the Revised Traffic
Element of the Growth Management Plan (Table 1) and are
summarized in Table 2. Of the.37 arterial segments defined, 2S
were designated Class XII, S were Class XI- and 7 were Class 1:.
~ );-;2J/
(
Of the 11 arterial interchange segments, 8 were designated Class
III, 1 was Class II and 2 were Class I. The final arterial
network and segment classifications determined for the 1992 TMP
study have been used for the 1994 study and are shown in Figure
1.
As can be seen from Figure 1, all of the arterials which have
been designated Class III are located in the already developed
areas of the City west of I-80S. This lower arterial
classification is necessary due to the constrained operating
conditions of the street system and the nature of existing
development in these areas. The only exception to this occurs on
Main street between Third Ave. and I-80S where there are fewer
signals per mile, more limited access and parking, and higher
free flow speeds than are typical of other arterial segments in
the central part of the City. In the developing areas east of 1-
805, most of the arterial segments are Class I. Class II
segments have been designated east of I-80S on Telegraph Canyon
Rd. (west of Medical. Center Drive), East H st. (east of Otay
Lakes Road), and Bonita Rd. (east of Willow street) in previously
developed areas where traffic conditions are more restricted.
SUMMARY OF 1992 TMP STUDY RESULTS
(
The following table summarizes the results of the 1992
showing the number of arterial segments, listed
classification, which conform to each Level of Service during
PM peak period (4 PM to 6 PM).
Table 3
TMP
by
the
1992 TMP ARTERIAL PERFORMANCE
(PM PERIOD)
~ CLASS I
A 4
A/B* 1
B 1
B/C* 1
C
D-F
CLASS II CLASS III
2 2
1 4
2 11
5
3
TOTAL
8
6
14
6
3
o
* Indicates segments operating at different LOS i~ different ditections.
(
Table 4 presents the results of the 1992 TMP Study in terms of
arterial LOS, average speed and travel time for each arterial
segment and arterial interchange segment studied. Information
from this table on arterial..segment LOS is also presented
graphically in Figure 2
/ /f-2JJY
Table 4
1992 TRAFFIC MONITORING PROGRAM
( ARTERIAL SEGMENT LOS (PM PERIOD)
AVG. TRAVEL
SPEED TIME
SEGMENT DIR. LOS (MPH) (MIN:SEC)
Third Ave.
(Class III)
Fourth Ave. H st.' NB C 15.8 5:16.7
SB C 17.2 4:51.0
H st. Naples st. NB B 22.0 4:05.8
5B B 20.5 4:24.3
Naples st. South CVCL NB C 18.7 5: 18.2
SB C 18.1 5:28.2
Fourth Ave.
(Class III)
SR-54 EB RmpS - H st. NB B 20.2 4:27.7
SB C 18.1 4:58.7
H st. Naples st. NB B 21.0 4: 17.5
SB B 21.9 4:07.0
Naples st. Main st. NB B 22.6 3:20.7
SB B 21.8 3:27.6
Boni ta ad.
Plaza Bonita - willow st.2 EB A 40.1 1 :52.1
(Class I) WB B 34.0 2: 1 1.3
Willow st. East CVCL EB B 25.8 1:49.2
(Class II) WB B 26.4 1 :46.7
East CVCL Central Ave.2 EB A 31.5 1 :06.8
(Class II) WB A 39.2 0:53.7
Broadway
(Class III)
cst. H st. NB B 22.7 3:19.3
SB C 17.6 4:16.5
H st. L st. NB B 24.6 2:26.8
SB B 21.2 2:50.1
L st. South CVCL NB 'B 19.2 5:47.6
SB B 19.9 5:35.7
/
\
1 Includes 25 MPH speed zone.
2 County Road
//J~~JJ
Table 4 (Cont.)
(
1992 TRAFFIC MONITORING PROGRAM
ARTERIAL SEGMENT LOS (PM PERIOD)
AVG. TRAVEL
SPEED TIME
SEGMENT DIR. LOS (MPH) (MIN:SEC)
ESt.
(Class III)
1-5 NB Rmps Third Ave. EB C 16.2 4:09.5
WB B 19.7 3:25.0
Third Ave. Bonita Glen EB B 24.6 2:37.1
WB A 26.9 2:23.8
F st.
(Class III)
Broadway Hilltop Dr. EB B 22.6 3:58.8
WB B 21.8 4:07.8
I H st. IE. H st.
(Class III)
1-5 NB Ramps Third Ave. EB C 17.6 3:49.3
WB C 15.1 4:28.5
Third Ave. I-80S SB Ramps EB B 23.6 3:14.1
WB A 25.2 3: 01. 7
East H st.
I-80S NB Rmps - SW College Ent. EB A 39.5 4:57.7
(Class I) WB A 36.4 5:22.5
SW College Ent- Rutgers Ave. EB B 29.7 1:44.4
(Class II) WB B 24.6 2:06.2
Hilltop Dr.
(Class III)
F st. L st. NB B 22.7 3:59.3
SB B 22.0 4:07.4
L st. Orange Ave. NB B 24.1 4:17.8
( SB B 21.8 4:44.7
~ /j'- .2r?7
Table 4 (Cont.)
1992 TRAFFIC MONITORING PROGRAM
ARTERIAL SEGMENT LOS (PM PERIOD)
i
SEGMENT
DIR.
LOS
Industrial Blvd.
(Class III)
L St.
Main st.
NB
SB
B
B
J St.
(Class III)
1-5 NB Ramps
Third Ave.
EB
WB
B
B
L st.
(Class III)
{
EB
WB
EB
WB
C
B
A
B
Industrial Bl.- Third Ave.
Third Ave. Tel. Cyn. Rd.'
AVG.
SPEED
(MPHI
23.4
23.2
22.0
22.0
18.5
20.2
25.0
23.2
TRAVEL
TIME
(MIN:SEC)
3:47.2
3:48.7
3:03.6
3:04.0
3:38.7
3: 21.1
3:49.5
4:07.0
Main St.
Industrial Bl.- Third Ave. EB B 22.2 3:05.3
(Class III) WB A 26.2 2:37.2
Third Ave. I-80S SB Ramps EB A 38.8 2:29.2
(Class II) WB A 31.2 3:05.4
Orange Ave./E. Orange Ave.
(Class III)
Palomar st.
Hilltop Dr.
A
,A
A
A
EB
WB
EB
WB
Hilltop Dr.
Melrose Ave.
(
1 Includes 25 MPH speed zone.
.Y /7/:2'1/
27.4
26.7
28.9
26.9
3:24.5
3:29.8
1: 46.1
1: 53.9
Table 4 {Cont.)
(
1992 TRAFFIC MONITORING PROGRAM
ARTERIAL SEGMENT LOS (PM PERIOD)
AVG. TRAVEL
SPEED TIME
SEGMENT DIR. LOS (MPHI (MIN:SECI
otay Lakes Rd.
(Class I)
Bonita Rd. East H st. NB B 34.0 4: 10.3
SB B 30.9 4:34.7
East H st. Tel. Cyn. Rd. NB C 23.5 1 :38.6
SB B 34.0 1 :08.0
Tel. Cyn. Rd. - Eastlake Pkwy EB A 43.4 2:23.8
WB A 38.2 2:43.1
otay Valley Rd.
(Class I)
I-80S NB Ramps- East CVCL EB A 43.8 2:24.7
WB A 43.2 2:26.7
(
Palomar st.
(Class III)
1-5 NB Ramps - Broadway EB C 16.5 2: 10. 7
WB B 20.7 1 :44.7
Broadway . Hilltop Dr. EB B 22.4 4:01.2
WB B 20.0 4:29.6
Telegraph Canyon Rd.
Halecrest Dr. - Med. Cntr. Dr. EB A 33.2 1: 51.5
(Class II) WB B 27.2 2:16.2
Med. Cntr. Dr.- Otay Lakes Rd. EB A 44.9 3:16.5
(Class I) WB A 46.8 3:08.7
TOTAL ARTERIAL SEGMENTS: 37
(
/ /:J---~~~
Table 4 (Cont.)
1992 TRAFFIC MONITORING PROGRAM
SEGMENT LOS (PM PERIOD)
(
ARTERIAL XNTERCHANGE SEGMENTS
SEGMENT
E st. (Class III)
Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave.
H st. (Class III)
Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave.
J st. (Class III)
Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave.
Bay Blvd. (Class I)
J Street - Palomar Street
Palomar st. (Class III)
Bay Blvd. - Industrial Bl.
Main st. (Class XII)
Frontage - Industrial Bl.
I
SEGMENT
Bonita Rd. (Class III)
Bonita Glen - Plaza Bonita
East H st. (Class XI)
Hilltop Dr. - Hidden Vista
Telegraph Cyn Rd. (Class III)
Nacion Ave. - Halecrest Dr.
East Orange Ave. (Class III)
Melrose Ave.- Oleander Ave.
Otay Valley Rd. (Class I)
Melrose Ave.- Oleander Ave.
1-5
DIlL
EB
WB
EB
WB
EB
WB
NB
SB
EB
WB
EB
WB
I-80S
DIRe
EB
WB
EB
WB
EB
WB
EB
-WB
EB
WB
LOS
D
C
C
E
C
D
B
A
C
D
B
A
LOS
B
A
C
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
TOTAL ARTERIAL INTERCHANGE SEGMENTS: 11
y J'7 / J.1)
AVG.
SPEED
(MPH)
10.7
13.0
16.2
7.6
13.0
12.3
33.2
37.0
18.0
12.3
22.3
31.9
AVG.
SPEED
(MPH)
21.4
30.1
21.6
26.6
28.4
19.5
26.0
24.7
40.3
34.9
TRAVEL
TIME
(MIN:SEC)
1:19.8
1:06.0
0:37.2
1: 19.6
0:59.9
1:03.6
2:14.8
2:00.8
1: 18. 3
1:54.6
1:02.7
0:43.8
TRAVEL
TIME
(MIN:SEC)
1 :01 .7
0:44.0
2:42.0
2:11.0
0:31.3
0:45.5
0:50.0
0:52.6
0:38.3
0:44.3
, ~
~ -
0;, .~ ! ~
~
~ '!. ~~
\ .. rJ!<"
\ . !4 \ ... \ ~
A P
'!. '1~\~
.. '\ \ \
.
~
. ..
.
..
....
"'--
~
\
~
~
f.~ o.
..~ ....
" .~
\ .~
J .~
or. .~
~.1 '"
;.~
.~
.~.". 0;
..
...\~.. :
,
LEGEND
o
,.
-.-.-.- LOS It
------ LOS.
................. LOS C
c:
:>
Art.rlal S....nt
.......
.-.
.-.
._.~
'--
OTAY ""'lltt- lID
-,
_nos
II'''" ST
Vear 1992 Traffic Monitoring Progra.
Arteria' Seg.ent Lev.I. of Service
PM PeriC>...
F ,re 2
(
Table 4 indicates that nine arterial segments were found to
operate at LOS C in at least one direction during the PM peak
period and that no arterial segments operate at less than LOS C.
The following is a list of the arterial segments which were found
to operate at LOS C by the 1992 TMP:
Third Ave.
Third Ave.
Fourth Ave.
Broadway
ESt.
H st.
L st.
Otay Lakes
Palomar st.
(Fourth Ave./C st. - H st.)
(Naples st.- S. City Limits)
(SR-54 EB ramps - H st.)
(C street - H street)
(1-5 NB ramps - Third Ave.)
(1-5 NB ramps - Third Ave.)
(Industrial - Third Ave.)
(E. H st. - Tel. Canyon Rd.)
(1-5 NB ramps - Broadway)
- NB & SB
- NB & SB
- SB
- SB
- EB
- EB & WB
- EB
- NB
- EB
(
The Threshold Standards of the Growth Management Plan specify
that LOS C or better, as measured by observed average travel
speed, shall be maintained on all signalized arterial segments
except that during peak hours LOS 0 can occur for no more than
any two hours of the day. Since no arterial segment studied
operated at less than LOS C, the Threshold Standards of the
Growth Management Plan were satisfied for the 1992 TMP.
Evaluation of the field data from the 1992 TMP Study also
provides information on travel time for each arterial segment.
This data indicates that, depending on the route and direction
chosen, it takes from 5 1/2 to 8 minutes to travel across the
City (west of I-80S) in an east/west direction and from 11 1/2 to
approximately 14 1/2 minutes to travel the length of the City
(west of I-80S) in a north/south direction during the PM peak
period.
In addi tion to studying arterial segments wi thin the City, the
1992 TMP evaluated eleven arterial interchange segments (6 along
1-5 and 5 along I-80S). The results for these segments, which
are presented in Table 4, are summarized in the following table:
Table 5
1992 TMP ARTERIAL INTERCHANGE
SEGMENT PERFORMANCE (PM PERIOD)
(Number of Segments Conforming to Each LOS
LQS CLASS I CLASS II CLASS III
A/B* 2 4
B/C* 1
C/O* 3
( C/E* 1
TOTAL
6
1
3
1
* Indicates segments operating at different LOS's in different directions.
y /5/e/-fr
(
From Table 4 it can be seen that,' during the PM peak period,
arterial interchange segments along I-80S are functioning at LOS
B or better with the exception of East H st. (Hilltop Dr. to
Hidden Vista Dr.) which is operating at LOS C in the eastbound
direction. Along 1-5, all arterial interchange segments are
operating at LOS C or better except for the following locations:
ESt.
H st.
J st.
Palomar st.
(Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave.) -
(Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave.) -
(Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave.) -
(Bay Blvd. - Industrial)
LOS D (EB)
LOS E (WB)
LOS D (WB)
LOS D (WB).
Although the City's Threshold Standards exclude segments at
freeway ramps, LOS measurements at interchanges are a growth
management consideration for projects which will have a
significant impact at those interchanges. Because higher volumes
and lower LOS's typically occur at freeway ramp intersections,
LOS A through D operations are considered acceptable for arterial
interchange segments while LOS E and F are considered a
significant impact. Using these guidelines, only the segment on
H Street at 1-5 (in a westbound direction) is impacted by a poor
Level of Service (LOS E) during the PM peak period.
SUMMARY OF 1993 TMP STUDY RESULTS
(
The following
showing the
classification,
table summarizes the results of the 1993 TMP
number of arterial segments, listed by
which conform to each LOS during the AM period.
Table 6
1993 TMP ARTERIAL PERFORMANCE
(AM PERIOD)
A
A/B*
B
B/C*
C
D-F
CLASS I CLASS II CLASS III
4 2 5
0 1 4
1 1 10
0 1 3
1
TOTAL
~
11
5
12
4
1
o
* Indicates segments operating at different LOS'. in different directions.
(
In addition to a City-wide study evaluating LOS during the AM
period (7 AM to 9 AM), limited studies during the PM period (4 PM
to 6 PM) were also conducted in order to reevaluate those
arterial segments found by the 1992 TMP to be operating at LOS C
in at least one direction. Table 7 compares the 1992 operating
performance of these segments wi th their performance as
determined by the 1993 TMP.
~
) f' ~.,2 Y..5'
Table 7
( ARTERIAL SEGMENT LOS COMPARISON
(PM PERIOD)
1992 VS. 1993
1992 1993
Avg. Speed 1992 Avg. Speed 1993
Street (MPH) ~ (MPH) ~
Third Ave.
(C st. - H St.)
Northbound 15.8 C 19. , B
Southbound 17.2 C 16.3 C
Third Ave.
(Naples - S. CVCL)
Northbound 18.7 C 19.2 B
Southbound 18.1 C 23.5 B
Fourth Ave.
(SR-54 EB - H st. )
Northbound 20.2 B 18.7 C
Southbound 18.1 C 18.5 C
Broadway
( (C st. - H st.)
Northbound 22.7 B Excluded from TMP
Southbound 17.6 C due Rd. construction
ESt.
(1-5 NB - Third)
Eastbound 16.2 C 18.3 C
Westbound 19.7 B 19.0 B
H st.
(1-5 NB - Third)
Eastbound 17.6 C Excluded from TMP
Westbound 15.1 C due Rd. construction
L st.
(Industrial- Third)
Eastbound 18.5 C 19.4 B
Westbound 20.2 B 18.5 C
otay Lakes Rd.
(E. H st.- Tel. Canyon)
Northbound 23.5 C 19.5 D
Southbound 34.0 B 28.8 B
Palomar st.
(1-5 NB - Broadway)
( Eastbound 16.5 C 12.7 D
Westbound 20.7 B 13.6 C
~ /'l/.2fJ
(
(
(
Of the nine segments found by the 1992 TMP to be operating at LOS
C, 2 segments (one on Broadway and one on H Street) could not be
restudied due to road construction projects in progress, 5
segments continue to operate at LOS C or better, and 2 segments
have experienced a decrease in Level of Service from LOS C to LOS
o for one direction of travel. On Otay Lakes Road between
Telegraph Canyon Rd. and East H st. the LOS has decreased from
LOS C to LOS 0 for northbound traffic. This decrease in LOS is
caused by increased delay experienced by northbound traffic at
the Otay Lakes Rd. lEast H st. intersection and represents an
average decrease of 4.0 MPH (from 23.5 MPH to 19.5 MPH) over the
length of the segment for this class I arterial. On Palomar
Street between the 1-5 NB ramps and Broadway the LOS has
decreased from LOS C to LOS 0 for eastbound traffic. This
decrease in LOS is due to increased delay experienced by
eastbound traffic at the Palomar St./lndustrial Blvd. and Palomar
St./Trolley Station intersections and represents an average
decrease of 3.8 MPH (from 16.5 MPH to 12.7 MPH) over the length
of the segment for this class III arterial.
Table 8 presents the results of the 1993 TMP Study in terms of
arterial LOS, average speed and travel time for each direction of
each of the arterial segments studied. The LOS information from
this table is also presented graphically in Figure 3.
~ );-,.2'17
t.
Table B
1993 TRAFFIC MONITORING PROGRAM
ARTERIAL SEGMENT LEVELS OF SERVICE
(AM PERIOD)
SEGMENT DIR.
Third Ave.
(Class III)
Fourth Ave. H st.' NB
SB
H St. Naples st. NB
SB
Naples St. South CVCL NB
SB
AVG.
SPEED
(MPH)
LOS
C
B
B
B
B
B
18.5
20.0
24.0
22.6
20.2
22.6
TRAVEL
TIME
(MIN:SEC)
4:30.0
4:09.3
3:45.0
3:59.5
4:54.0
4:22.8
Fourth Ave.
(Class III)
SR-54 EB Rmps - H St. NB A 25.6 3:30.8
SB B 21.7 4:09.0
H st. Naples St. NB B 20.0 4:29.7
SB B 23.2 3:53.3
Naples St. Main st. NB A 27.3 2:46.0
SB B 24.0 3:09.0
Bonita Rd.
Plaza Bonita Willow St.2 EB A 41.9 1 :46.5
(Class I) WB A 43.3 1 :43.0
Willow st. East CVCL EB B 27.0 1 :44.5
(Class II) WB B 27.0 1 :44.4
East CVCL Central Ave.2 EB A 35.3 0:59.6
(Class II) WB A 40.0 0:52.6
Broadway
(Class III)
C st. H st. NB
SB Excluded from the 1993
H St. L st. NB TMP due to road
SB construction.
L st. South CVCL NB
SB
(
, Includes 25 MPH speed zone.
2 County Road
? ///;2/j"JY
t
Table 8 (Cont.)
1993 TRAFFIC MONITORING PROGRAM
ARTERIAL SEGMENT LEVELS OF SERVICE
(AM PERIOD)
AVG. TRAVEL
SPEED TIME
SEGMENT ...m.1L- LOS (MPH) (MIN:SEC)
ESt.
(Class III)
1-5 NB Rmps - Third Ave. EB B 20.5 3:17.6
WB B 22.1 3:02.8
Third Ave. - Bonita Glen EB A 26.4 2:26.4
WB A 27.1 2:22.8
F st.
(Class III)
Broadway - Hilltop Dr. EB B 24.4 3:41.5
WB B 21.9 4:06.8
( H st. IE. H st.
(Class III)
1-5 NB Ramps - Third Ave. EB C 17.1 3:56.8
WB B 20.4 3:18.0
Third Ave. I-80S SB Ramps EB A 26.3 2:54.3
WB A 28.7 2:39.5
East H st.
I-80S NB Rmps - SW College Ent. EB
(Class X) WB
SW College Ent- Rutgers Ave. EB
(Class II) WB
A
A
B
C
35.0
40.5
27.9
23.2
5:36.0
4:49.7
1: 51. 2
2:13.7
Hilltop Dr.
(Class III)
F st. - L st. NB B 23.1 3:55.5
SB B 23.0 3:57.0
( L st. - Orange Ave. NB B 24.6 4: 12.0
SB B 22.6 4:35.0
/ JJ--.2-'11
Table 8 (Cont.)
1993 TRAFFIC MONITORING PROGRAM
ARTERIAL SEGMENT LEVELS OF SERVICE
(AM PERIOD)
AVG. TRAVEL
SPEED TIME
SEGMENT DIR. LOS (MPH) (MIN:SEC)
Industrial Blvd.
(Class III)
L st. Main SL NB B 24.0 3: 41.1
SB B 24.4 3:38.2
J st.
(Class III)
1-5 NB Ramps
Third Ave.
EB
WB
A
A
25.2
25.4
2:40.5
2:39.3
i.
L st.
(Class III)
Industrial Bl.- Third Ave.
EB
WB
EB
WB
B
A
A
A
22.2
25.0
25.7
27.5
3:02.5
2:42.3
3:43.0
3:28.3
Third Ave. Tel. Cyn. Rd.'
Main st.
Industrial Bl.- Third Ave. EB B 22.3 3:04.5
(Class III) WB B 22.9 2:59.6
Third Ave. I-80S SB Ramps EB A 36.1 2:40.3
(Class II) WB A 30.8 3:08.2
Orange Ave./E. Orange Ave.
(Class III)
Palomar st. Hilltop Dr. EB .A 28.1 3:19.8
WB B 24.1 3:53.0
Hill top Dr. Melrose Ave. EB A 28.4 1 :48.0
WB A 28.1 1 :49.2
(
1 Includes 25 MPH speed zone.
/ 1'1-" Hc7
(
Table 8 (Cont.)
1993 TRAFFIC MONITORING PROGRAM
ARTERIAL SEGMENT LEVELS OF SERVICE
(AM PERIOD)
AVG. TRAVEL
SPEED TIME
SEGMENT DIR. LOS (MPHI (MIN:SEC)
otay Lakes Rd.
(Class I)
Bonita Rd. East H St. NB B 31.3 4:32.0
SB B 30.9 4:35.2
East H st. Tel. Cyn. Rd. NB C 23.6 1 :38.2
SB C 27.3 1 :24.8
Tel. Cyn. Rd. - Eastlake Pkwy EB A 44.5 2:10.8
WB A 46.3 2:05.8
Otay Valley Rd.
(Class I)
I-80S NB Ramps- East CVCL
EB
WB
Excluded from 1993 TMP
(bridge washed out).
(
1-5 NB Ramps - Broadway
Broadway Hilltop Dr.
Palomar st.
(Class III)
EB
WB
EB
WB
C
B
B
B
18.7
23.6
23.2
22.9
1:55.8
1: 31.5
3:53.2
3:55.8
Telegraph canyon Rd.
Halecrest Dr. - Med. Cntr. Dr. EB A 33.8 1 :49.3
(Class II) WB B 28.9 2:07.8
Med. Cntr. Dr.- Otay Lakes Rd. EB A 46.1 3: 11.4
(Class I) WB A 46.7 3:09.2
TOTAL ARTERIAL SEGMENTS: 37
(
/
J ;J ~ o1S- /
Table 8 (Cont.)
1993 TMP ARTERIAL INTERCHANGE
SEGMENT LOS (AM PERIOD)
ARTERIAL INTERCHANGE SEGMENTS
1-5
AVG. TRAVEL
SPEED TIME
SEGMENT DIR. LOS (MPH) (MIN:SEC)
E Street (Class III) EB C 17.8 0:48.1
Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave. WB C 17.3 0:49.6
H Street (Class III) EB C 14.5 0: 41.5
Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave. WB C 13.0 0:46.5
J Street (Class III) EB B 20.1 0:38.7
Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave. WB C 18.5 0:42.1
Bay Blvd. (Class I) NB B 31.8 2:20.7
J Street - Palomar Street SB A 36.6 2:02.3
Palomar St. (Class III) EB C 17.0 1: 23.2
Bay Blvd. - Industrial Bl. WB C 17.6 1: 20.2
Main Street (Class III) EB B 21.4 1: 05.3
Frontage - Industrial Bl. WB A 31.3 0:44.7
-
I-80S
AVG. TRAVEL
SPEED TIME
SEGMENT DIR. LOS (MPH) (MIN:SEC)
Bonita Rd. (Class III) EB B 20.5 1 :04.6
Bonita Glen - Plaza Bonita WB B 22.6 0:58.4
East H st. (Class II) EB C 22.5 2:35.2
Hilltop Dr. - Hidden Vista WB B 25.7 2: 15.9
Telegraph Cyn Rd. (Class III) EB B 22.0 0:39.8
Nacion Ave. - Halecrest Dr. WB B 19.4 0:46.8
East Orange Ave. (Class III) EB A 28.2 0:46.0
Melrose Ave.- Oleander Ave. WB B 24.9 0:52.1
otay Valley Rd. (Class I) EB A 38.0 0:40.7
Melrose Ave.- Oleander Ave. WB 'A 37.8 0:40.8
TOTAL ARTERIAL INTERCHANGE SEGMENTS: 11
y /7'-.25;L
..
~
~
~
!.
'"
..
(. s~
~
'4! 6
.. !.t 0 'P:
,. 't $ '4 ~
\\\'"
!r.
f s~
s~
G
" s1
s~
\
J s1
.,. s~
s"
\.
;ss~
S1.
f',J-~ :
'--
~
\
\
~
s~
pt'\~" :
..
..
"t
~
~
!.
'"
.
Yo
f~
,..-<<
",.
scjS<
'-1 ~
Q ;:1
P
C-
."
Arterlol S.o...nt
1993 Traffic Monitoring Program
Arterial Segment Levele of Service
AM Per
I
..
~
...
~
...
'"
..~
V
~
LEGEND
LOS A
- - - - - -. LOS B
.............11.... LOS C
CJI/I"-z:,
5_0.."\ excluded
due to road con.t.
1Uo,.. n
""llE:..
,.0
DWG,
SM93LOS
F'~ure 3
(
Table 8 indicates that five of the arterial segments in the City
operate at LOS C in at least one direction during the AM peak
period (7 AM to 9 AM) and that none of the arterial segments
studied operate at less than LOS C. The following is a list of
those arterial segments which were found to operate at LOS C
during the AM peak period:
Third Ave.
H st.
E. H st.
Otay Lakes
Palomar St.
(Fourth Ave./C st. - H st.)
(1-5 NB ramps - Third Ave.)
(SW College - Rutgers Ave.)
(E. H st. - Tel. Canyon Rd.)
(1-5 NB ramps - Broadway)
- NB
- EB
- WB
- NB & SB
- EB
(
The Threshold Standards of the Growth Management Plan specify
that LOS C or better, as measured by observed average travel
speed, shall be maintained on all signalized arterial segments
except that during peak hours LOS 0 can occur for no more than
any two hours of the day. The results of the 1993 TMP indicate
that, during the AM peak period, no arterial segment operates at
less than LOS C. For those arterial segments restudied during
the PM peak period (4 PM to 6 PM), it was found that two segments
(one on Otay Lakes Rd. and one on Palomar st.) operate at LOS 0
for one direction of travel. Therefore, the results of this
year's study indicate that the Threshold Standards of the Growth
Management Plan have been satisfied for the 1993 Traffic
Monitoring Program.
Evaluation of the field data from the 1993 TMP Study also
provides information on travel time for each arterial segment.
The travel time for each direction of each arterial segment
studied during the AM peak period is listed in Table 8. This
information indicates that, depending on the route and direction
chosen, it takes from 5 1/2 to 8 minutes to travel across the
City (west of I-80S) in an east/west direction and from 10 1/2 to
13 minutes to travel the length of the City (west of I-80S) in a
north/south direction during the AM peak period.
In addition to studying arterial segments wi thin the City, the
1993 TMP evaluated eleven arterial interchange segments during
the AM peak period (6 along 1-5 and 5 along I-80S). The results
for these segments, which are presented in Table 8, are
summarized in the following table:
y ;9/..25'1
(
Table 9
1993 TMP ARTERIAL INTERCHANGE
SEGMENT PERFORMANCE (AM PERIOD)
(Number of Segments Conforming to Each LOS)
~ CLASS I CLASS II CLASS III
A 1
A/B* 1 2
B 2
B/C* 1 1
C 3
D-F
TOTAL
1
3
2
2
3
o
* Indicates segments operating at different LOS's in different directions.
From table 8 it can be seen that, during the AM peak period,
arterial interchange segments along I-80S are operating at LOS B
or better with the exception of East H st. (between Hilltop Dr.
and Hidden Vista Dr.) which is operating at LOS C in the
eastbound direction. Along 1-5, all arterial interchange
segments are operating at LOS C or better during the AM period.
In addition to studying all arterial interchange segments during
the AM period (7 AM to 9 AM), limited studies during the PM
period (4 PM to 6 PM) were also conducted in order to reevaluate
those segments found by the 1992 TMP to be operating at LOS C or
less in at least one direction. Table 10 compares the 1992
operating performance of these segments with their performance as
determined by the 1993 TMP.
(
/" )J-.:255"
( Table 10
1993 TMP ARTERIAL INTERCHANGE
SEGMENT LOS COMPARISON (PM PERIOD)
1992 VS. 1993
1-5
1992 1993
Avg. Speed 1992 Avg. Speed 1993
Seament Itl.L. (MPHI ~ (MPHI ~
E Street EB 10.7 D 16.6 C
(Bay - Woodlawn) WB 13.0 C 12.1 D
H Street EB 16.2 C 15.0 C
(Bay - Woodlawn) WB 7.6 E 8.4 E
J Street EB 13.0 C 14.5 C
(Bay - Woodlawn) WB 12.3 D 15.1 C
Palomar Street EB 18.0 C 10.4 D
(Bay - Industrial) WB 12.3 D 15.2 C
( I-80S
1992 1993
Avg. Speed 1992 Avg. Speed 1993
Seament Itl.L. (MPHI ....LQS. (MPHI ..l&.S.
East H st. EB 21.6 C 20.2 C
(Hilltop-Hid. Vista) WB 26.6 B 28.2 B
From table 10 it can be seen that, during the PM period, all
arterial interchange segments studied are operating at LOS C or
better except for the following locations:
ESt.
H st.
Palomar st.
(Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave.) -
(Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave.) -
(Bay Blvd. - Industrial)
LOS D (WB)
LOS E (WB)
LOS D (EB).
(
Although the City'S Threshold Standards exclude segments at
freeway ramps, LOS measurements at interchanges are a growth
management consideration for projects which will have a
significant impact at those interchanges. . Because higher volumes
and lower LOS's typically occur at freeway ramp intersections,
LOS A through D operations are considered acceptable for arterial
interchange segments while LOS E and F are considered a
significant impact. Using these guidelines, only the segment on
H Street at 1-5 (in a westbound direction) is impacted by a poor
~ /J- ..2Y?
(
Level of Service (LOS E) during the PM period. However,
comparison of the 1992 and 1993 data indicates that the LOS for
this segment has not changed and that the average travel speed
along the segment has remained about the same (7.6 MPH in 1992
compared to 8.4 MPH in 1993).
1994 'l'MP STUDY RESULTS AND ANALYSIS
This section of the report analyzes and presents the results of
the field studies for the 1994 TMP for the arterial segments
shown in Figure 1. The.results for the 11 arterial interchange
segments studied are found in the section titled ARTERIAL
INTERCHANGE SEGMENTS which follows this section of the report.
Arterial LOS is directional in nature and is based on both the
classification and the average travel speed of the arterial
segment under consideration. The following table summarizes the
results of the 1994 TMP showing the number of arterial segments,
listed by classification, which conform to each Level of Service
during the Mid-day peak period (11:30 AM to 1:30 PM).
Table 11
(
1994 TMP ARTERIAL PERFORMANCE
(MID-DAY PERIOD)
~
A
A/B*
B
B/C*
C
D-F
CLASS I CLASS II CLASS III
4 2 3
0 1 4
1 1 10
1 1 5
3
TOTAL
9
5
12
7
3
o
* Indicates segments operating at different LOS's in different directions.
(
In addition to a City-wide study evaluating LOS during the Mid-
day peak period (11:30 AM to 1:30 PM), limited studies were also
conducted during both the AM period (7 AM to 9 AM) and the PM
period (4 PM to 6 PM). These studies reevaluated those arterial
segments found by last ye~r's TMP to be operating at or below LOS
C in at least one direction as well as restudying the H St./East
H st. corridor from 1-5 to Rutgers Avenue. Also included were
segments which could not be studied during last year's program
due to road construction. Table 12 presents these results for
the AM period, comparing the 1993 and 1994 data obtained for
those segments which were restudied this year. Table 13 provides
the same comparison of 1993 and 1994 data for those segments
studied during the PM period.
~ / <J - :<5"?
( Table 12
ARTERIAL SEGMENT LOS COMPARISON
(AM PERIOD)
1993 VS. 1994
1993 1994
Avg. Speed 1993 Avg. Speed 1994
Seqment Dir. (MPH) ~ (MPH) LOS
Third Ave. NB 18.5 C 19.1 B
(C St. - H st. ) SB 20.0 B 20.7 B
Broadway NB Excluded from TMP 27.4 A
(C st. - H St. ) SB due Rd. construction 21.1 B
Broadway NB Excluded from TMP 26.1 A
(H st. - L st. ) SB due Rd. construction 25.1 A
Broadway NB Excluded from TMP 21.2 B
(L St. - s. CVCL) SB due Rd. construction 21.7 B
H st. EB 17.1 C 19.3 B
(1-5 NB - Third) WB 20.4 B 20.2 B
I H st. EB 26.3 A 25.2 A
.
(Third - I-80S SB) WB 28.7 A 24.2 B
East H st. EB 35.0 A 37.6 A
(1805 NB - SWC Ent) WB 40.5 A 34.5 B
East H st. EB 27.9 B 28.7 B
(SWC Ent - Rutgers) WB 23.2 C 21.7 C
Otay Lakes Rd. NB 23.6 C 22.2 C
(E. H St.- Tel. Cyn) SB 27.3 C 29.9 B
Otay Valley Rd. NB Excluded from TMP Excluded from TMP
(I-80S NB - CVCL) SB (Rd. construction) (Rd. construction)
Palomar St. EB 18.7 C 19.5 B
(1-5 NB - Broadway) WB 23.6 B 23.5 B
Of the eleven segments designated for study during the AM period,
1 segment (on Otay Valley Rd. east of I-80S) could not be studied
due to road construction projects in progress; each of the other
10 segments studied continue to operate at LOS C or better during
this time period.
(
/ /i-;L5:r
(
Table 13
ARTERIAL
SEGMENT LOS COMPARISON
(PM PERIOD)
1993 VS. 1994
Seament ~
1993
Avg. Speed
(MPH)
1993
~
Third Ave. NB
(C st. - H st.) SB
19.1
16.3
18.7
18.5
B
C
C
C
1994
Avg. Speed
(MPH)
18.6
17.1
20.1
21.1
1994
~
C
C
Fourth Ave. NB
(SR-54 EB - H st.) SB
B
B
Broadway NB
(C st. - H st.) SB
22.7*
17.6*
B*
C*
22.5
19.8
18.8
18.6
17.7
19.3
23.0
23.9
35.3
33.2
30.3
22.3
17.7
19.8
21.9
24.7
15.2
14.9
B
B
ESt. EB
(1-5 NB - Third) WB
H St. EB
(1-5 NB - Third) WB
18.3
19.0
17.6*
15.1 *
C
B
C
C
C
B
C*
C*
(
H st.
(Third - I-80S SB)
EB
WB
23.6"
25.2"
B--
A--
B
B
East H st. EB
(1805 NB - SWC Ent) WB
East H st. EB
(SWC Ent - Rutgers) WB
L st. EB
(Industrial- Third) WB
Otay Lakes Rd. NB
(E. H st.- Tel. Cyn) SB
39.5"
36.4--
A--
A--
A
B
29.7"
24.6"
B"
B--
A
C
Palomar st. EB
(1-5 NB - Broadway) WB
19.4
18.5
19.5
28.8
12.7
13.6
B
C
C
B
D
B
D
C
C
C
D
C
* 1992 TMP data (Excluded from 1993 TMP due to road construction).
" 1992 TMP data (Not studied in 1993 because '92 'LOS was better than LOS C).
(
For the 1994 TMP, eleven segments were studied during the PM peak
period. Nine of these segments continue to operate at LOS C or
better when compared to last year's data. One segment, on
Palomar st. between the 1-5 NB ramps and Broadway, has increased
from LOS D to LOS C for eastbound traffic. . This increase in LOS
~ /~-.25'j
(
represents an increase in average travel speed of 2.5 MPH (from
12.7 MPH to 15.2 MPH) over the length of the segment. The final
segment, on otay Lakei Road between Telegraph Canyon Rd. and East
H st., continues to operate at LOS D for northbound traffic. It
has, however, experienced an increase in average travel speed
from 19.5 MPH to 21.9 MPH for this direction of travel.
Table 14 presents the results of the 1994 TMP study in terms of
arterial LOS, average speed and travel time for each direction of
each arterial segment studied during the Mid-day peak period.
The LOS information from this table is also presented graphically
in Figure 4.
To compare LOS values for each time period studied by the TMP
please refer to Appendix A at the end of this report. This
appendix combines information from the 1992, 1993 and 1994 TMP
studies to provide LOS values and average travel speeds (in MPH)
for each arterial and arterial interchange segment studied
during the AM, Mid-day and PM peak periods.
(
7 /'l~.2'?P
Table 14
1994 TRAFFIC MONITORING PROGRAM
( ARTERIAL SEGMENT LEVELS OF SERVICE
(MID-DAY PERIOD)
AVG. TRAVEL
SPEED TIME
SEGMENT DIR. LOS (MPH) (MIN:SEC)
Third Ave.
(Class III)
Fourth Ave. H St.' NB C 18.0 4:37.5
SB C 16.1 5: 10.1
H st. Naples St. NB B 20.9 4:19.2
SB B 20.4 4:25.3
Naples St. South CVCL NB B 21.2 4:40.8
SB B 21.3 4:38.8
Fourth Ave.
(Class III)
SR-54 EB Rmps - H St. NB B 20.5 4:23.5
SB C 18.5 4:51.9
H st. Naples St. NB B 23.4 3: 51.4
( SB A 26.2 3:26.5
Naples St. Main st. NB A 26.6 2:50.5
SB B 22.9 3:17.8
Bonita Rd.
Plaza Bonita Willow st.2 EB A 37.0 2:00.8
(Class I) WB A 41.5 1:47.6
Willow St. East CVCL EB B 28.4 1 :39.4
(Class II) WB B 25.1 1: 52.5
East CVCL Central Ave.2 EB A 32.5 1 :04.8
(Class II) WB A 39.0 0:54.0
Broadway
(Class III)
C st. H St. NB B 22.8 3:18.0
5B C 18.8 3:59.7
H St. L st. NB B 20.4 2:56.4
SB 'B 19.6 3:04.0
L St. South CVCL NB C 17.0 6:32.1
SB B 20.8 5:21.7
(
1 Includes 25 MPH speed zone.
2 County Road
~/'J--;2&J
Table 14 (Cont.)
(
1994 TRAFFIC MONITORING PROGRAM
ARTERIAL SEGMENT LEVELS OF SERVICE
(MID-DAY PERIOD)
AVG. TRAVEL
SPEED TIME
SEGMENT DIR. LOS (MPH) (MIN:SEC)
ESt.
(Class III)
1-5 NB Rmps Third Ave. EB B 19.0 3:33.5
WB C 18.5 3:39.2
Third Ave. Bonita Glen EB B 24.8 2:35.8
WB A 25.4 2:32.1
F St.
(Class III)
Broadway Hilltop Dr. EB B 21.5 4: 11.3
WB B 22.1 4:04.8
(
H st. IE. H st.
(Class III)
1-5 NB Ramps Third Ave. EB C 16.8 4:00.2
WB C 17.9 3:46.6
Third Ave. I-80S SB Ramps EB A 25.3 3:00.9
WB A 26.0 2:55.8
East H st.
I-80S NB Rmps -
(Class
SW College Ent-
(Class
SW College Ent.
I)
Rutgers Ave.
II)
EB
WB
EB
WB
A
A
B
C
36.6
36.0
25.7
21.0
5:20.3
5:25.9
2: 01.1
2:28.0
Hilltop Dr.
(Class III)
F st. L st. NB B 21.6 4:12.0
SB B 21.5 4:13.6
( L st. Orange Ave. NB B 22.9 4:30.6
SB B 23.7 4:22.2
y )/~cJt;2
Table 14 (Cont.)
(
1994 TRAFFIC MONITORING PROGRAM
ARTERIAL SEGMENT LEVELS OF SERVICE
(MID-DAY PERIOD)
AVG. TRAVEL
SPEED TIME
SEGMENT DIR. LOS (MPHI (MIN:SECI
Industrial Blvd.
(Class III)
L St. Main st. NB B 20.9 4:14.0
SB B 24.6 3:36.1
J st.
(Class III)
1-5 NB Ramps
Third Ave.
EB
WB
(
L st.
(Class III)
Industrial Bl.- Third Ave.
EB
WB
EB
WB
Third Ave. Tel. Cyn. Rd. 1
B
B
22.8
23.1
2:57.6
2:55.2
3:48.3
3:05.2
3:43.6
3:39.0
Main st.
Industrial Bl.- Third Ave. EB B 20.2 3:23.9
(Class III) WB B 22.3 3:04.7
Third Ave. I-80S SB Ramps EB A 33.0 2:55.5
(Class II) WB A 31.1 3:06.5
C
B
A
A
17.8
21.9
25.7
26.2
Orange Ave./E. Orange Ave.
(Class III)
Palomar st.
Hilltop Dr.
EB
WB
EB
WB
Hilltop Dr.
Melrose Ave.
1 Includes 25 MPH speed zone.
'A
B
A
A
25.4
22.7
30.2
29.6
~ /5'/,2t-y
3:40.7
4:07.0
1:41.1
1 :43.0
Table 14 (Cont.)
(
1994 TRAFFIC MONITORING PROGRAM
ARTERIAL SEGMENT LEVELS OF SERVICE
(MID-DAY PERIOD)
AVG. TRAVEL
SPEED TIME
SEGMENT DIR. LOS (MPH) (MIN:SEC)
otay Lakes Rd.
(Class I)
Bonita Rd. East H St. NB B 30.9 4:34.9
SB B 30.8 4:36.4
East H st. Tel. Cyn. Rd. NB C 26.6 1: 27.0
SB B 32.3 1 :11.6
Tel. Cyn. Rd. - Eastlake Pkwy EB A 45.4 2:07.6
WB A 42.3 2: 16.8
otay Valley Rd.
(Class I)
I-80S NB Ramps- East CVCL
EB
WB
Excluded from TMP
due Rd. construction
(
I-5 NB Ramps - Broadway
Palomar st.
(Class III)
EB
WB
EB
WB
C
C
B
B
18.2
17.7
22.6
21.0
1: 59. 0
2:02.1
3:59.2
4: 17.1
Broadway Hilltop Dr.
Telegraph Canyon Rd.
Halecrest Dr. - Med. Cntr. Dr. EB A 32.8 1 :52.7
(Class II) WB B 26.9 2:17.3
Med. Cntr. Dr.- otay Lakes Rd. EB A 46.9 3:08.1
(Class I) WB A 49.1 2:59.9
TOTAL ARTERIAL SEGMENTS: 37
/ / tj~ ;LiR'I
- ?; t
<;. ~
~ f~
~ !. ...~ ~
~ ~ .. (jJ~'"
'\ 'fl e \ ~ r:::J ~
..\"", ~ '"
A
!. ,,~ ~ ~ ~
.. o ~"...
..
..
o
..
..~
V
~
..
..
E. S1
..
f S1 ..
o S1
.. S1
,s'1
. ..
J S1 ..
.,. S1
\. S1
S S1
'IPS
S1.
~,,\.; .:
LEGEND
"----
~
~
~
~
~
..
LOS '"
- - - - - - . LOS B
1111"'11""""'1 LOS C
c
~
Art.rlal Segment
CJI///rn
Seg"'8nt exeluded
due to road conet.
S1
"",1":
MAIN ST
OTAY
""'llE:,.
""
-..
SM94LOS
1994 Traffic Monitoring Program
Arterial Segment Levels of Service
Mid-day P'rlod
Figure 4
Table 14 indicates that ten of the arterial segments in the City
operate at LOS C in at least one direction during the Mid-day
peak period (11:30 AM to 1:30 PM) and that none of the arterial
segments studied operate at less than LOS C. The following is a
list of those arterial segments which were found to operate at
LOS C during the Mid-day period:
Third Ave.
Fourth Ave.
Broadway
Broadway
ESt.
H st.
E. H st.
L st.
Otay Lakes
Palomar st.
(Fourth Ave./C st. - H st.)
(SR-S4 EB Rmps - H st.)
(C st. - H St.)
(L st. - s. CVCL)
(I-S NB ramps - Third Ave.)
(I-S NB ramps - Third Ave.)
(SW College - Rutgers Ave.)
(Industrial - Third Ave.)
(E. H st. - Tel. Canyon Rd.)
(I-S NB ramps - Broadway)
- NB & SB
- SB
- SB
-NB
-WB
-EB&WB
-WB
- EB
-NB
- EB & WB
(
The Threshold Standards of the Growth Management Plan specify
that LOS C or better, as measured by observed average travel
speed, shall be maintained on all signalized arterial segments
except that during peak hours LOS D can occur for no more than
any two hours of the day. The results of the 1994 TMP indicate
that no arterial segment operates at less than LOS C during the
Mid-day peak period. For those arterial segments restudied
during the AM period (7 AM to 9 AM), no arterial segment operates
at less than LOS C. For the PM period (4 PM to 6 PM), it was
found that one segment on Otay Lakes Rd. continues to operate at
LOS D for one direction of travel. Therefore, the results of
this year's study indicate that the Threshold Standards of the
Growth Management Plan have been satisfied for the 1994 Traffic
Monitoring Program.
Evaluation of the field data from the 1994 TMP study also
provides information on travel time for each arterial segment.
The travel time for each direction of each arterial segment
studied is listed in Table 14. This information indicates that,
depending on the route and direction chosen, it takes from 6 to
8 1/2 minutes to travel across the City (west of I-80S) in an
east/west direction and from 11 to 14 1/2 minutes to travel the
length of the City (west of I-BOS) in a north/south direction
during the Mid-day peak period.
ARTERIAL INTERCHANGE SEGMENTS
\
In addition to studying arterial segments within the City,
information was gathered for arterial street segments crossing
freeway interchanges. These street segments, which have been
designated "arterial interchange segments", are generally defined
to begin and end at the major. intersections along the studied
arterial which are immediately beyond the intersections of the
.? /9-" ;LJ,?
(
freeway ramps with the local streets. Defining arter.ial
interchange segments in this way allows the impact of the freeway
interchange on the studied arterial to be evaluated separately
from adjacent arterial segments. This is important because
arterial segments are subject to the Threshold Standards of the
Growth Management Plan while segments at the freeway ramps are
not subject to these Standards.
The following table lists the eleven arterial interchange
segments that have been designated for study:
Table 15
ARTERIAL INTERCHANGE SEGMENT LISTING
(
1-5
E Street (Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave. ) - Class III
H Street (Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave. ) - Class III
J Street (Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave.) - Class III
Bay Blvd. (J Street - Palomar Street) - Class I
Palomar st. (Bay Blvd. - Industrial Bl.) - Class III
Main st. (Frontage - Industrial Bl.) - Class III
I-80S
Bonita Rd. (Bonita Glen - Plaza Bonita) - Class III
East H st. (Hilltop Dr. - Hidden Vista) - Class II
Tele. Cyn Rd. (Nacion Ave. - Halecrest Dr.) - Class III
E. Orange Ave. (Melrose Ave.- Oleander Ave.) - Class III
Otay Valley Rd. (Melrose Ave.- Oleander Ave.) - Class I
Due to the short length of arterial interchange segments, and the
close spacing of traffic signals in these areas, travel times
obtained on any given segment could vary significantly. This
variation was caused by the difference between traveling a
segment with no delay at any traffic signal and traveling the
same segment being delayed at one or more intersections. Because
of this wide variation in the field data, it was not possible to
achieve an 80.. level of confidence for some of the arterial
interchange segments studied without doing a very large number of
data runs. In those cases, studies were limited to 40 data runs
in the affected direction. Of the 11 arterial interchange
segments studied, only the following 2 directional studies were
limited to 40 data runs each with a level of confidence of less
than 80..:
H st.
H st.
(Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave.)
(Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave.)
- WB (PM)
- EB (Mid-day)
(
The results for the Mid-day period for the arterial interchange
segments studied in the 1994 TMP are presented in Table 16. The
Level of Service information shown in this table is summarized in
Table 17.
~ /7'<_2d>?
Table 16
( 1994 TMP ARTERIAL INTERCHANGE
SEGMENT LOS (MID-DAY PERIOD)
ARTERIAL INTERCHANGE SEGMENTS
1-5
AVG. TRAVEL
SPEED TIME
SEGMENT DIR. LOS (MPH) (MIN:SECl
E Street (Class III) EB C 16.8 0: 51.1
Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Aye. WB C 13.2 1 :04.6
H Street (Class III) EB D 10.8 0:55.8
Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave. WB C 14.8 0:40.6
J Street (Class III) EB C 13.4 0:58.3
Bay Blvd. - woodlawn Ave. WB C 14.3 0:54.5
Bay Blvd. (Class I) NB B 32.3 2: 18.4
J Street - Palomar Street SB A 36.7 2: 01.7
Palomar st. (Class III) EB C 14.0 1 :41 .0
Bay Blvd. - Industrial B1. WB C 16.2 1 :27.3
Main Street (Class III) EB B 22.1 1: 03.2
Frontage - Industrial B1. WB A 32.3 0:43.3
I-B05
AVG.
SPEED
(MPH)
21.0
25.B
26.6
29.9
23.4
17.5
SEGMENT
Bonita Rd. (Class III)
Bonita Glen - Plaza Bonita
DIR.
LOS
EB
WB
B
A
East H st. (Class II)
Hilltop Dr. - Hidden Vista
Telegraph Cyn Rd. (Class III)
Nacion Ave. - Ha1ecrest Dr.
EB
WB
B
B
EB
WB
B
C
East Orange Ave. (Class III)
Melrose Ave.- Oleander Ave.
EB
WB
A
A
27.9
25.4
Otay Valley Rd. (Class I)
Melrose Ave.- Oleander Ave.
TRAVEL
TIME
(MIN:SECl
1: 03.0
0: 51.3
2: 11.3
1:56.6
0:37.4
0:51. 7
0:46.5
0:51.2
EB
WB
Excluded from TMP
due Rd. construction
(
TOTAL ARTERIAL INTERCHANGE SEGMENTS: 11
/ J9----;2iPY
Table 17
(
1994 TMP ARTERIAL INTERCHANGE
SEGMENT PERFORMANCE
MID-DAY PERIOD
(Segments Conforming to Each LOS)
~
TOTAL
A
A/B*
B
B/C*
C
C/D*
D-F
1
3
1
1
3
1
o
* Indicates segments operating at different LOS's in different directions.
(
From the information shown in table 16 it can be seen that during
the Mid-day period arterial interchange segments along I-80S are
functioning at better overall Levels of Service than segments
along 1-5. Along I-80S, every arterial interchange segment is
operating at LOS B or better with the exception of Telegraph
Canyon Rd. (between Nacion Ave. and Halecrest Dr.) which is
operating at LOS C in the westbound direction. Along 1-5, all
arterial interchange segments are operating at LOS C or better
except for H st. (between Bay Blvd. and Woodlawn Ave.) which is
operating at LOS 0 in the eastbound direction.
In addition to studying all arterial interchange segments during
the Mid-day peak period (11: 30 AM to 1: 30 PM), 11mi ted studies
were also conducted during the AM period (7 AM to 9 AM) and
during the PM period (4 PM to 6 PM) in order to reevaluate those
segments found by last year's TMP to be operating at LOS C or
less in at least one direction. The results of these studies are
presented in Table 18 (for the AM period) and in Table 19 (for
the PM period). Each of these tables compare the 1993 operating
performance of these segments with their current performance as
determined by the 1994 TMP.
(
\
y /c;---ol!:>;7
Table 18
( 1994 TMP ARTERIAL INTERCHANGE
SEGMENT LOS COMPARISON
(AM PERIOD)
1993 VS. 1994
ARTERIAL INTERCHANGE SEGMENTS
1-5
1993 1994
Avg. Speed 1993 Avg. Speed 1994
Seament Dir. . (MPH) ~ (MPH) LOS
E Street EB 17.8 C 20.2 B
(Bay - Woodlawn) WB 17.3 C 17.9 C
H Street EB 14.5 C 19.2 B
(Bay - Woodlawn) WB 13.0 C 13.7 C
J Street EB 20.1 B 19.3 B
(Bay - woodlawn) WB 18.5 C 16.3 C
Palomar Street EB 17.0 C 14.1 C
(Bay - Industrial) WB 17.6 C 17.7 C
I-80S
1993 1994
Avg. Speed 1993 Avg. Speed 1994
Seament ~ (MPH) ~ (MPH) ~
East H st. EB 22.5 C 25.5 B
(Hilltop-Hid. Vista) WB 25.7 B 30.2 A
From this information it can
interchange segments studied are
during the AM period.
be seen that all arterial
operating at LOS C or better
y /9 --- -17c
Table 19
(
1994 TMP ARTERIAL INTERCHANGE
SEGMENT LOS COMPARISON
(PM PERIOD)
1993 VS. 1994
ARTERIAL :INTERCHANGE SEGMENTS
1-5
Seament ~
1993
Avg. Speed
(MPH)
16.6
12.1
15.0
8.4
1993
~
1994
Avg. Speed
(MPH)
1'.3
12.6
1994
~
E Street EB
(Bay - Woodlawn) WB
C
D
C
D
C
C
11.8
9.3
15.1
12.2
13.1
15.2
D
D
H Street EB
(Bay - Woodlawn) WB
J Street EB
(Bay - Woodlawn) WB
C
E
Palomar Street EB
(Bay - Industrial) WB
14.5
15.1
10.4
15.2
C
D
D
C
C
C
(
I-80S
Seament
1993
Avg. Speed
~ (MPH)
1993
~
1994
Avg. Speed
(MPH)
21.8
28.9
1994
~
East H st. EB
(Hilltop-Hid. Vista) WB
20.2
28.2
C
B
C
B
From the information provided in this table it can be seen that,
during the PM period, all arterial interchange segments studied
are operating at LOS C or better except for the following
locations which are operating at LOS D:
ESt.
H st.
J st.
(Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave.) -
(Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave.) -
(Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave.) -
(WB)
(EB), (WB)
(WB) .
Comparison of this year's data with last year's study also shows
that the one segment (westbound on H st. between Bay Blvd. and
Woodlawn Ave.) which was operating at LOS E last year has
improved to LOS D. This increase in LOS is the result of an
increase in average travel speed along the length of the segment
(from 8.4 MPH in 1993 to 9.3 MPH in 1994).
~/9~,,27)
(
When evaluating Levels of Service' for arterial interchange
segments, the following factors must be considered:
1. Because turning movements at the intersections of
arterial streets and freeway ramps exceed 20 percent of
total traffic volumes, most arterial interchange segments do
not meet the Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) definition of
arterial street segments.
2. Most segments are short with controlled intersections
spaced from 130' to 750' apart. This causes traffic delayed
at freeway ramp intersections to back up along the length of
the segment.
3. Segments along 1-5 also have trolley crossings close to
the northbound ramp intersections. Grade crossings for the
trolley restrict the speed of vehicles as they cross the
tracks. Also, due to the frequency of trolley operations
during daylight hours, additional delay will be experienced
by vehicles at the intersections of the arterial and the
freeway ramps.
4. Traffic signals at freeway ramps are under the
jurisdiction of Caltrans and, therefore, are not part of
Chula Vista's signal system. Typically, Cal trans signals
favor traffic on the ramps. This keeps traffic on the ramps
from backing up onto the freeway but increases the delay to
traffic on the street crossing the freeway.
5. The existence of a transit center or other major
traffic generator at or near a freeway interchange will
serve to increase the volume of traffic attracted to the
interchange. An example of such a facility would be the
transit center which is located on the north side of H st.
at the 1-5 interchange.
Since the HCM definition of arterial streets excludes segments
where turning movements at signalized intersections exceed 20
percent of total traffic volumes, the City's Threshold Standards
excluded arterial interchange segments at freeway ramps. The
Standards do note, however, that LOS measurements on segments at
freeway ramps shall be a growth management consideration in
situations where proposed developments have ,a significant impact
at interchanges. Since higher volume levels and lower Levels of
Service are typically anticipated at freeway ramp intersections,
LOS A through D operations are considered acceptable for arterial
interchange segments while LOS E and F are considered a
significant impact and are unacceptable. Using these guidelines,
the 1994 TMP Study indicates that all arterial interchange
segments studied are operating at acceptable Levels of Service.
/ /i/ c2?:L
(
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
(
The purpose of the 1994 TMP Study is to assess the Level of
Service of arterial segments for compliance to the Threshold
Standards of the Growth Management Plan. These Threshold
Standards specify that LOS C or better, as measured by observed
average travel speed, shall be maintained on all signalized
arterial segments except that during peak hours LOS D can occur
for no more than any two hours of the day. The 1994 Study
indicates that, during the Mid-day peak period, no arterial
segment operates at less than LOS C. For the ten arterial
segments restudied during the AM period (7 AM to 9 AM) it was
also found that no arterial segment operates at less than LOS C.
During the PM peak period (4 PM to 6 PM) only the northbound
direction of the segment on Otay Lakes Rd. between East H st. and
Telegraph Canyon Rd. operates at LOS Dj the other segments
studied operate at LOS C or better. Therefore, the results of
this year's study indicate that the Threshold Standards of the
Growth Management Plan have been satisfied for the 1994 Traffic
Monitoring Program.
With respect to the segment of Otay Lakes Rd. mentioned above, it
should be noted that this LOS D condition is primarily due to
congestion at the intersection of Otay Lakes Rd. and East H st.
due to the high volume of left turning movements. When studied
in April 1994, the LOS D condition for this segment was found to
occur as the averaae condition over the two hour period studied.
However, insufficient data was available to determine whether or
not LOS D actually occurred for the full two hours. In February
1995, the segment of Otay Lakes Rd. from E. H St. to Telegraph
Canyon Rd. was restudied. This study, which was conducted during
the hours from 3 PM to 7 PM for the northbound direction of Otay
Lakes Rd. and included more detailed information, disclosed that
Level of Service D occurred for a maximum of one hour of this
four hour period (see Appendix B at the end of this report). The
problem is not as severe as previously reported and, therefore,
the priority for the improvements to provide additional capacity
at the intersection of E. H St./Otay Lakes Rd. is not critical.
However, expected land development in the eastern area will
result in increases in traffic volumes on Otay Lakes Rd. and E. H
st. which will undoubtedly affect the LOS on these facilities in
the near future. Eventually, traffic growth will necessitate
that additional capacity be provided at the intersection of E. H
St./Otay Lakes Road. It is for this reason that we have
concluded that the intersection improvement project should remain
in the Transportation Development Impact Fee (T-DIF) proqram and
remain in the City's Capital Improvement Proqram. This project
will provide short term relief by reducing congestion and
improving Level of Service.
(
In addition to studying arterial segments, the 1994 THP also
assessed the operating LOS of 10 arterial interchange segments
during the Mid-day period and reevaluated 5 segments during both
~ /~-.J,?)
(
the AM period and the PM period. Although the City's Threshold
standards exclude segments at freeway ramps, arterial interchange
segments are studied to obtain information to aid in evaluating
the impact of proposed developments on existing interchanges.
Using existing guidelines, which consider LOS A through D as
acceptable for arterial interchange segments, all the segments
studied during this year's TMP were found to be operating at
acceptable Levels of Service.
For the 1995 TMP study, it is recommended that those arterial
segments which were found to operate at LOS C or less by the 1994
TMP be restudied. In 1996, the Traffic Monitoring Program's
study cycle will begin again with City-wide travel time studies
for the PM period (4:00 PM to 6:00 PM) being done to establish
new baseline data for that peak period.
(
(C. \5M\941lo1P\941lo1PFR2. DOC)
Fll.: TF-2l5
(
fr )j-J-?Y
- - ,--
Appendix A
1994 TMP ARTERIAL SEGMENT LOS
ALL TIME PERIODS
AM PERIOD3 MID-DAY PERIO[)4 PM PERIO!)2
AVG. AVG. AVG.
SEGMENT DIR. LOS SPEED LOS SPEED LOS SPEED
Third Ave.
(Class III)
4th Ave./C st.- H st.' NB B 19.1. C 18.0 C 18.6.
SB B 20.7. C 16.1 C 17.1.
H st. - Naples st. NB B 24.0 B 20.9 B 22.0
SB B 22.6 B 20.4 B 20.5
Naples st. South CVCL NB B 20.2 B 21.2 B 19.23
SB B 22.6 B 21.3 B 23.53
'-
~ Fourth Ave.
\ (Class III)
N
'-:J SR-54 EB Rmps - H st. NB A 25.6 B 20.5 B 20.1.
'\ SB B 21.7 C 18.5 B 21.1.
H st. - Naples st. NB B 20.0 B 23.4 B 21.0
SB B 23.2 A 26.2 B 21.9
Naples St. - Main st. NB A 27.3 A 26.6 B 22.6
SB B 24.0 B 22.9 B 21.8
Bonita Rd.
Plaza Bonita - Willow st. 5 ED A 41.9 A 37.0 A 40.1
(Class 1) WB A 43.3 A 41.5 B 34.0
Willow st. - Bast CVCL ED B 27.0 B 28.4 B 25.8
(class II) WB B 27.0 B 25.1 B 26.4
East CVCL - Central Ave.5 ED A 35.3 A 32.5 A 31.5
(Class II) WB A 40.0 A 39.0 A 39.2
1 Includes 25 MPH speed zone. 3 1993 Data 5 County Road
2 1992 Data 4 1994 Data
-,
,-
~
Appeh.1ix A
1994 TMP ARTERIAL SEGMENT LOS
ALL TIME PERIODS
SEGMENT
DIR.
AM PERIOD3
AVG.
LOS SPEED
MID-DAY PERIOD4
AVG.
LOS SPEED
PM PERI002
AVG.
LOS SPEED
Broadway
(Class III)
cst. H St. NB A 27.44 B 22.8 B 22.54
SB B 21.14 C 18.8 B 19.84
H st. L St. NB A 26.14 B 2-0.4 B 24.6
SB A 25.14 B 19.6 B 21.2
L St. South CVCL NB B 21.24 C 17.0 B 19.2
SB B 21.74 B 20.8 B 19.9
'-
~
\
~ ESt.
~ (Class III)
~ 1-5 NB Rmps Third 20.5 19.0 18.84
- Ave. EB B B C
WB B 22.1 C 18.5 C 18.64
Third Ave. Bonita Glen EB A 26.4 B 24.8 B 24.6
WB A 27.1 A 25.4 A 26.9
Hilltop Dr.
po st.
(Class III)
B
B
24.4
21.9
B
B
21.5
22.1
B
B
22.6
21.8
Broadway
EB
WB
2 1992 Data
3 1993 Data
4 1994 Data
Appendix A
1994 TMP ARTERIAL SEGMENT LOS
ALL TIME PERIODS
SEGMENT
DIR.
AM PERI003
AVG.
LOS SPEED
MID-DAY PERIOD4
AVG.
LOS SPEED
PM PERI002
AVG.
LOS SPEED
H st../z. H St..
(Class III)
I-5 NB Ramps - Third Ave. EB B 19.34 C 16.8 C 17.74
WB B 20.24 C 17.9 B 19.34
Third Ave. - I-80S SB Ramps EB A 25.24 A 25.3 B 23.04
WB B 24.24 A 26.0 B 23.94
"- East. H St..
""'tl
\
"-.J I-80S NB Rmps - S" Colleqe Ent.. EB A 37.64 A 36.6 A ' 35.34
".) (Class I) WB B 34.54 A 36.0 B 33.24
"-J S" Colleqe Ent.- Rut.qers Ave. EB B 28.74 B 25.7 A 30.34
(Class II) WB C 21.74 C 21.0 C 22.34
Hillt.op Dr.
(Class III)
PSt.. - L St.. NB B 23.1 B 21.6 B 22.7
SB B 23.0 B 21.5 B 22.0
L St.. - Oranqe Ave. NB B 24.6 B 22.9 B 24.1
SB B 22.6 B 23.7 B 21.8
2 1992 Data
3 1993 Data
4 1994 Data
-,
.-
-
Appen\1ix A
1994 TMP ARTERIAL SEGMENT LOS
ALL TIME PERIODS
SEGMENT
DIR.
AM PERIOD3
AVG.
LOS SPEED
MID-DAY PERIOD4
AVG.
LOS SPEED
PM PERI002
AVG.
LOS SPEED
Industrial Blvd.
(Class III)
L st.
Main st.
NO
S8
8
8
24.0
24.4
8
8
20.9
24.6
8
8
23.4
23.2
J st.
(Class III)
"--
~ 1-5 NO Ramps - Third Ave. E8 A 25.2 8 22.8 B 22.0
\ we A 25.4 8 23.1 8 22.0
N
"J
\ L st.
(Class III)
Industrial Bl.- Third Ave. E8 8 22.2 C 17.8 C 17.74
we A 25.0 8 21.9 8 19.84
Third Ave. Tel. Cyn. Rd.' E8 A 25.7 A 25.7 A 25.0
we A 27.5 A 26.2 8 23.2
1 Includes 25 MPH speed zone.
2 1992 Data
3 1993 Data
4 1994 Data
-
-
Appendix A
1994 TMP ARTERIAL SEGMENT LOS
ALL TIME PERIODS
SEGMENT
DIR.
AM PERIO[)3
AVG.
LOS SPEED
MID-DAY PERIOD4
AVG.
LOS SPEED
PM PERI002
AVG.
LOS SPEED
Main St:.
Industrial B1.- Third Ave. EB B 22.3 B 20.2 B 22.2
(Class III) WB B 22.9 B 22.3 A 26.2
Third Ave. I-80S SB Ramps EB .A 36.1 A 33.0 A 38.8
(Class II) WB A 30.8 A 31.1 A 31.2
'-..... Orange Ave./E. Orange Ave.
~ (Class III)
\ Palomar st. - Hilltop Dr. EB A 28.1 A 25.4 A 27.4
~ WB B 24.1 B 22.7 A 26.7
"'0 Hilltop Dr. - Melrose Ave. EB A 28.4 A 30.2 A 28.9
"-JJ WB A 28.1 A 29.6 A 26.9
ot:al' Lakes Rd.
(Class 1)
Bonita Rd. - East H st. NB B 31.3 B 30.9 B 34.0
SB B 30.9 B 30.8 B 30.9
East: H st. - Tel. Cyn. Rd. NB C 22.24 C 26.6 D 21.94
. 5B B 29.94 B 32.3 C 24.74
Tel. Cyn. Rd. - Eastlake Pkwy EB A 44.5 A 45.4 A 43.4
WB A 46.3 A 42.3 A 38.2
2 1992 Data 4 1994 Data
3 1993 Data
Appen~J.x A
1994 TMP ARTERIAL SEGMENT LOS
ALL TIME PERIODS
SEGMENT
DIR.
AM PERIOD3
AVG.
LOS SPEED
MID-DAY PERIOD4
AVG.
LOS SPEED
PM PERIOoZ
AVG.
LOS SPEED
otay Valley Rd.
(Class I)
. I-80S NB Ramps- East: CVCL EB * * * * A 43.8
1m * * * * A 43.2
palOlUr st.
(Class III)
'-....... 1-5 NB Ramps - Broadway EB B 19.54 C 18.2 C 15.24
"tJ 1m B 23.54 C 17.7 C 14.94
\ Broadway Hilltop Dr. EB B 23.2 B 22.6 B 22.4
N 1m B 22.9 B 21.0 B 20.0
~ 'l'elegraph canyon Rd..
Halecrest Dr. - Med. cntr. Dr. EB A 33.8 A 32.8 A 33.2
(Class II) 1m B 28.9 B 26.9 B 27.2
Med. cnt:r. Dr.- Ot:ay Lakes Rd. EB A 46.1 A 46.9 A 44.9
(Class 1) 1m A 46.7 A 49.1 A 46.8
TOTAL ARTERIAL SEGMENTS: 37
2 1992 Data
3 1993 Data
4 1994 Data
* No data (due to road construction).
-
Appendix A
1994 TMP SEGMENT LOS
ALL TIME PERIODS
ARTElUAL bnr.KCIIARGB SEQmRTS
1-5
-
SEGMENT
DIR.
AM PERIOoJ
AVG.
LOS SPEED
MID-DAY PERI004
AVG.
LOS SPEED
PM PERIOD2
AVG.
LOS SPEED
ESt. (Class III) ED B 20.24 C 16.8 C 17.34
Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave. WB C 17.94 C 13.2 D 12.64
H st. (Class III) ED B 19.24 D 10.8 D 11.84
Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave. WB C 13.74 C 14.8 D 9.34
"--
'-.!J J st. (Class III) ED B 19.34 C 13.4 C 15.14
\
~ Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave. WB C 16.34 C 14.3 D 12.24
~ Bay Blvd. '(Class I)
---- NB B 31.8 B 32.3 B 33.2
J Street - Palomar Street SB A 36.6 A 36.7 A 37.0
Palomar st. (Class III) ED C 14.14 C 14.0 C 13.14
Bay Blvd. - Industrial Bl. WB C 17.74 C 16.2 C 15.24
Main St. (Class III) ED 8 21.4 B 22.1 8 22.3
Frontage ~ Industrial 81. WB A 31.3 A 32.3 A 31.9
2 1992 oata
3 1993 Data
4 1994 Data
~
Appe.....ix A
1994 TMP SEGMENT LOS
ALL TIME PERIODS
ARTERIAL IR'l'BRCRAMGE s~rs
I-80S
SEGMENT
DIR.
AM PERI003
AVG.
LOS SPEED
MID-DAY PERIOD4
AVG.
LOS SPEED
PM PERI002
AVG.
LOS SPEED
Bonita Rd. (Class III) EB B 20.5 B 21.0 B 21.4
Bonita Glen - Plaza Bonita WB B 22.6 A 25.8 A 30.1
East H st. (Class II) EB B 25.54 B 26.6 C 21.84
Hilltop Dr. - Hidden Vista WB A 30.24 B 29.9 B 28.94
"-
'-t)
\ Telegraph Cyn Rd. (Class III) EB B 22.0 B 23.4 A 28.4
}-:> Nacion Ave. - Halecrest Dr. WB B 19.4 C 17.5 B 19.5
'0<?
~ East Orange Ave. (Class III) EB A 28.2 A 27.9 A 26.0
Melrose Ave.- Oleander Ave. WB B 24.9 A 25.4 B 24.7
Otay Valley Rd. (Class I) EB A 38.0 * * A 40.3
Melrose Ave.- Oleander Ave. WB A 37.8 * * B 34.9
TOTAL ARTERIAL INTERCHANGE SEGMENTS: 11
2 1992 Oata
3 1993 Data
4 1994 Data
. No data (due to road construetion).
'-.....
'-D
\
~
W
~.
--
Appendix B
FEBRUARY 1995 STUDY
OTAY LAKES RD.
FROM EAST H ST. TO TELEGRAPH CANYON RD.
Northbound
AVG. TRAVEL
SPEED TIME
TIME PERIOD LOS (MPH) (MIN:SEC)
3 PM to 4 PM C 22.7 1: 41.9
4 PM to 5 PM C 23.4 1: 39.1
5 PM to 6 PM C 22.3 1:43.8
6 PM to 7 PM D 19.0 2:02.1
MEMORANDUM
April 6, 1995
File: TF-215
SUBJECT :
Bob Leiter, Director of Planning
Cliff Swanson, Deputy Public
City Engineer
Hal Rosenberg, Traffic Engine~
Report on Traffic Concerns Expr~sed
Their Review of the 1993 TMP Report
Works
D,recti!
TO:
VIA:
FROM:
by the GMOC in
We are pleased to submit the attached report regarding the traffic
concerns expressed by the Growth Management Oversight Commission
(GMOC) in their review of the 1993 Traffic Monitoring Program (TMP)
Final Report.
In their review of the 1993 TMP Final Report, the GMOC expressed
concern for five locations in the City where they feel potential
threshold compliance problems could occur within the next five to
ten years. The GMOC requested that staff address these concerns in
the 1994 TMP Report. The five areas identified by the GMOC are "H"
St. between I-5 and I-80S, East "H" st. east of I-80S, Otay Lakes
Rd. between East "H" st. and Telegraph Canyon Rd., Palomar st.
between Broadway and I-5, and SR-125. Accordingly, staff has
prepared the attached report which provides information regarding
existing conditions and development plans for each location noted
above.
Attachment
SM:sm
File: TF-215
C:\SM\WP\M-94GM04.SM
) 9 ~cJ'}Y
Report on Traffic COncerns Expressed by the
Growth Management Oversight Commission
in Their Review of the 1993 TMP Report
April 6, 1995
) 9 -- 2~;;-
.'
Report on Traffic Concerns Expressed by the Growt:h Management
Oversight COmmission in !'heir Review of the 1993 '1'MP Report
In their review of the 1993 Traffic Monitoring Program (TMP) Fina1
Report, the Growth Management Oversight Commission (GMOC) expressed
concern for five locations in the. City where they felt potential
traffic threshold compliance problems could occur within the next
five to ten years. The GMOC requested that staff address these
concerns in the 1994 TMP Report. The five areas identified by the
GMOC are "H" st. between 1-5 and I-80S, East "H" st. east of I-80S,
Otay Lakes Rd. between East "H"St. and Telegraph canyon Rd.,
Palomar st. between Broadway and 1-5, and SR-125. Accordingly,
staff has prepared a special traffic information report regarding
these locations; The analysis for each of these areas is presented
in this report.
!'here are two levels of land use development described in this
report: near term and mid-range.
The near term level of land use development is identified in the
Eastern Chula Vista Transportation Phasing Plan (ECVTPP) as
reflected in the Rancho de1 Rey SPA I Amendment Traffic Analysis
dated July 17, 1992. This leve1 of development reflects a pre-SR-
125 circulation network (see Exhibit 1) and includes the following
developments: Rancho Del Rey (SPA'S I, II, and III), Eastlake,
Eastlake Greens, Olympic Training Center, and Sunbow. Salt Creek
1, Montillo, Canyon View, Woodcrest Southwestern, Ladera Villas,
and Terra Nova were also included in the study and have been
completed. This level of land development will generate an
addi tional 197,000 trips per day over what exiated in 1990 when the
study was performed. Development projects completed to date have
added 85,000 trips per day to 1990 traffic conditions. When the
remaining approved projects are built, this will add an additional
112,000 trips per day to the City's existing street network.
Assuming a construction rate of 1200 dwelling units per year, this
level of land development is projected to occur in approximately
the year 2004.
The mid-range level of land use development is identified in the
Interim Sa-125 Facility Feasibility Study (HNTB Study). !'his level
of development assumes a higher level of development than the TPP
scenario. The circulation network for the mid-range land
development scenario includes a pre-SR-125 facility between Sa-54
and East Orange Ave. and the extension of East Orange Ave. from l-
805 to Wueste Road. The following developments are included in
this mid-range level of development: Rancho Del Rey, . EasUak"
Sunbow, OlympiC Training Center, Salt creek 1, Salt creek Ranch ,
San Miguel Ranch', Otay Ranch (Villages 1 and 5)', Mentillo, Bonita
Meadows, Canyon View, Woodcrest Southwestern, Ladera Villas,
Woodcrest Terra Nova and the Baldwin/T.C.R. project. Depending on
economic trends and the rate of land development, this level of
development is projected to occur by the year 2010 and, if all
.(1) Not previously included in the TPP land development
~ :7 <;2-2"'?-
scenario. approved projects are built, would add approximately
353,000 vehicle trips to the planned circulation system over what
existed in 1990, or 268,000 more trips per day on today's (1995)
circulation network.
"H" St:reet: 11:-5 'I'O X-80S)
GMOC CONCERNS
The GMOC statement.of concern is as follows:
Given the .known physical and economic constraints to ..jor
future modifications of "N" st. west of I-BOS, the 1mpacts of
currently proposed, and/or ant1cipated, major development or
redevelopment projects should be scrutini~ed and tailored to
the l:l.m:l.tat:l.ons of the street. Recogn:l.~:l.ng the street's
l:l.mitations, and already contemplated projects such as Scripps
and the Chula Vista Center expansion, any further development
has the potential to overtax the street. Existing and
projected traffic volumes on "N" st. should be evaluated to
determine what level of development can be supported by
employing remedial measures such as signal t1ming, no left
turns, etc. If a threshold problem will eventually exist,
then also identify at what point land use limitations or other
similar measures would be necessary to maintain threshold
compliance.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
"H" st. from I-S to Third Ave. and East "H" st. from Hilltop Dr. to
I-80S are designated as six lane major streets in the Circulation
Element of the Chula Vista General Plan. Between Hilltop Dr. and
Third Ave., however, "H" st. is classified as a four lane ..jor
roadway. It is currently striped for two through lanes in each
direction with parking allowed mid-block between Broadway and Fifth
Ave. and between Fourth Ave. and Hilltop Drive. There are traffic
signals at all major intersections with parking prohibited on the
approaches to these intersections to provide single left turn
pockets on "H" st. at Woodlawn Ave., Fifth Ave., Second Ave., First
Ave. and for eastbound traffic at Hilltop Dr. and to provide dual
left turn pockets at Broadway, Fourth Ave. and Third Avenue.
Adjacent land use is commercial from I-5 to Third Ave., multi-
family reaidential from Third Ave. to Second Ave., and single
family residential between Second Ave. &Jld I-BOS. "H" St. is
currently 64' wide '(mid-block) within an BO' Rivht-of-Way with
additional Right-of-Way and street width at signalized
intersections. These existing street and Right-of-Way widths are
below current design standards for six lane and four lane major
streets designated as bike routes.
~ /J~..22-?
According to the City's street Design Standards Policy, the ideal
minimum width for a six lane major street west of %-805 is 92'
within a 112' Right-of-Way (116' in commercial areas) with
additional widening at intersections where dual left turn andlor
exclusive right turn lanes are required. This width provides a 14'
median, 11' travel lanes, 12' curb lanes and 5' shoulders (no
parking permitted). Using the same standards, the minimum width
for a four lane major street is 70' within a 90' Right-of-Way (94'
in commercial areas) with additional Right-of-Way and street
widening at intersections. Therefore, the existing width of "H"
st. is deficient by 6' for a standard width four lane road and 28'
for a standard width six lane road.
The speed limit on "H" st. is 35 MPH between %-5 and Hilltop Dr.
and on East "H" st. it is 40 MPH between Hilltop Dr. and I-80S.
Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volumes vary between 1-5 and I-80S as
shown in the following table:
"Hit/East "Hit street
Existing
Volume "Hit/East "Hit street.
Existing
Volmne
1-5 - Broadway
Broadway - Fifth Ave.
Fifth Ave.-Fourth Ave.
Fourth Ave. - Third Ave.
27,960
21,550
24,570
23,300
Third Ave. - Second Ave.
Second Ave. - First Ave.
First Ave.- Hilltop Dr.
Hilltop Dr. - I-80S
23,580
23,050
27,520
40,610
From field data obtained during the 1994 Traffic Monitoring Program
(TMP), "H" st . lEast "H" st., between 1-5 and I-80S is currently
functioning at the following Levels of Service (LOS):
AM Period Mid-Day PM Period
street Seament lax. LOS (MPH) LOS (MPH) LOS (MPH)
1-5 NB Ramps - Third Ave. EB B (19.3) C (16.8) C (17.7)
WB B (20.2) C (17.9) B (19.3)
Third Ave.- I-80S SB Ramps EB A (25.2) A (25.3) B (23.0)
WB .B (24.2) A (26.0) B (23.9)
DEVELOPMENT PLANS
Since the area west of I-80S is already developed, changes in
existing land use will only occur through the redevelopment
proces.. When commercial and employment development patterns in
the City have shifted to buildout conditions, as identified by the
General Plan level of development, "H" st. lEast "H" st. between 1-5
and I-80S is projected to carry the following traffic volumea:
YJ1~cJ.?r
Seament:
Projected
Volumes
LOS D
Design
Caoacitv
General
Plan
Desianation
1-5 to Third Ave.
Third Ave.- Hilltop Dr.
Hilltop Dr. to 1-805
39,000 - 30,000
33,000 - 32,000
41,000
45,000~
33,800,
45,000
6 lanes
4 lanes
6 lanes
1 - 6 lane ":lor LOS D design capacity
2 - 4 lane ":lor LOS D design capacity
It should be noted "that the LOS D design capacity traffic volumes
shown in the table above are approximate values which are used as
guidelines to determine the functional classification of planned
roadways. Actual roadway LOS D capacity is based on the ability of
arterial intersections to accommodate peak hour volumes. Optimal
signal timing and special intersection designs to increase traffic
flow could result in achieving higher capacities than those shown
above.
If widening of "H" St. to six lanes does not occur, the projected
volumes noted above could result in a poor Level of Service based
on the projected volumes and theoretical design capacities given
above. The level of congestion that may occur and the ability of
the segment to meet Threshold Standards will depend on the ability
of signalized intersections to accommodate peak hour volumes.
CIRCULATION XMPROVEMEN'l'S
It is expected that where "H" st. is widened to six lanes,
projected traffic volumes can be accommodated at an acceptable
Level of Service. It is not known at this time when the
construction of ultimate width improvements will be necessary.
However, through the Traffic Monitoring Program (TMP) we will be
able to determine the need in advance of unfavorable traffic
1mpacts.
With respect to proposed Capital Improvement Program (CIP) projects
which will impact "H" st., there are currently 3 projects planned
which will improve traffic conditions along this traffic corr1dor:
1 . At Fifth Ave., the existing traffic signal will be upgraded to
provide a protected!permisaive left turn phase 1n Fiscal Year
(FY) 1995-96.
2. At the East "H" St".!I-805 interchange, improvements are
proposed for FY 96-97 to provide ;ramp widening, street
widening (at the interchange for the south side of the
street), restriping and signal improvements.
3. A multi-year City-wide project ili planned to upgrade the
City's existing traffic signal system to an adaptive Urban
Traffic Control (i.e. SCOOT) system "which will be fully
//1--- ..2.rj
responsive to dynamically changing traffic conditions on the
City's roadway network. This project, which is proposed for
design in FY 95-96 and for construction in FY 96-97, is
substantially (97%) funded by federal grant funds. The
balance of the funding for this project is proposed to be
provided by traffic signal funds.
Reversible lane operation was previously examined as a possible
solution in providing additional capacity during peak periods.
After careful analysis, this idea was discounted as not being
applicable on H st.. between Hilltop Dr. and Third Avenue.
Reversible lanes are most beneficial when the traffic flow on a
street is tidal in nature with a strongly directional through
movement at one time of day which reverses during another time of
the day with little or no left turn demand along the length of the
reversible lane. This is not the case on H st. where directional
volumes are almost equal.
Additionally, at the intersections of Hilltop Dr./H st. and Third
Ave./H st. there are high volumes of left turns which cannot be
denied without creating significant out of direction travel and
traffic operational problems at other locations. This means that
a reversible lane would have to end before it reached either
Hilltop Dr. or Third Ave. and would, therefore, not improve Level
of Service at these locations. Because a reversible lane cannot
accommodate the heavy left turn demand on H st. and because peak
hour traffic volumes are not unbalanced enough to make reversible
lane operation effective, use of a reversible lane is not a viable
solution for increasing the capacity of the roadway and should not
be considered.
CONCLUSIONS
At the present time, "H" st. is operating at acceptable Levels of
Service. In the long term, however, traffic volumes are projected
to increase. This will result in a reduction in the Level of
Service along this route. It appears that our traffic Threshold
Standards may not be met in the future unless additional capacity
is provided.
Ultimately, traffic volumes are expected to exceed the theoretical
desicpl capacity of LOS C for the four lane major street
classification between Third. Ave. and Hilltop Dr. and for the
remaining segments of H st, that are not widened to their six lane
General Plan designation. Some additional capacity can be obtained
without major reconstruction by the relllOval of parking, by
constructing a raised median to prohibit mid-block left turns into
driveways and at minor cross streets, by prohibiting left turns at
intersections during peak hours, by changes to signal timing, and
by modest acquisition of Right-of-Way at intersections to provide
for exclusive right turn lanes or an additional left turn lane.
. '/Ji ~ ;2.'ltJ
Reversible lane operation, which requires strongly directional
through movements with little or no left turn demand, does not fit
the traffic characteristics of H St. and should not be considered.
It is anticipated that traffic demand on "H" st. will stabilize as
commercial and employment development patterns shift in the City to
buildout conditions. Although traffic volumes on "H" st. may be
high, staff is making every effort to maintain the highest LOS
possible during peak traffic periods given the nature of existing
development and Right-of-Way constraints along the "H" St. corridor
west of I-80S. In the future, however, it may not be possible to
meet current Threshold Standards without reclassifying the roadway
where necessary and widening. Due to the major impact that would
have on existing residential properties, the City may have to re-
evaluate the ~hreshold Standard or accept a lower Level of Service
for this portion of the roadway.
EAST fiB" ST. EAST OF :I-80S
GMOC CONCERNS
The GMOC statement of concern is as follows:
As the pri.nci.pal arteri.al for many of the large, approved, but
not yet bui.lt; projects i.n eastern Chula Vi.sta, East "N"
street's current confi.gurati.on and capaci.ty must meet related
traffi.c demands over the next 20+ year. as bui.ldout occurs.
As addi. ti.onal si.gnals are added between I-BOS and otay Lakes
Rd., and projects conti.nue to bui.ld, the GHOC 1. extremely
concerned that the street wi.ll become overtaxed, and result i.n
the need for a development moratori.um. In order for the GHOC
to clearly understand the potenti.al for a moratori.UIJI, and to
thereby accordi.ngly advi.se. the COunci.l, the Ci.ty f'raffi.c
Engi.neer ' s report should compre.hensi. vely analy~e all exi..ti.ng
and currently approved future land uses wi.thi.n the East "N"
st. .ervi.ce area to determi.ne i.f any land use or other
modi.fi.cati.ons are needed to correct potenti.al probl... before
they necessi.tate a moratori.um.
EXISTING CONDXTIONS
East "H" st. is currently built to its ultimate width in accordance
with the City Circulation Element of the General Plan from X-80S to
its current easterly limit east of future SR-125.
Existing traffic volumes for East "H" St-~ vary as shown in the
following table:
Y/9--oZ 9/
East "M" street'
Existing
Volume
E8St "M" street
Existing
Volume
I-80S - Hid. Vista
Hid. Vista - Terra Nova
Terra Nova - Del Rey
Del Rey - Ps del Rey
Ps del Rey -ps Ranchero
ps Ranchero-Buena Vista
54,180
43,530
43,720
40.640
36,880
30,570
Buena Vista-Otay Lakes~
Otay Lakes Rd. -~uburn
Auburn - Rutgers .
Rutgers - Eastlake DI.2
E~st of Eastlake Dr.
30,290.
19,670
15,400
11.310
2,440
, - 6 lane aection
2 - 4 lane section
Field data obtained during the 1994 TMP, shows that East "H" st.
between I-80S and Rutgers Ave. is currently functioning at an
acceptable Level of Service (LOS A for the eastbound direction and
LOS B for the westbound direction between I-80S and Otay Lakes Rd.
and, east of Otay Lakes Rd., at LOS B for the eastbound direction
and LOS C for the westbound direction of traffic).
BEAR-TERM SCENARIO (ECVTPP)
In the near term land development scenario identified by the
ECVTPP, East "H" st. is projected to carry the following traffic
volumes:
LOS 0
Projected Design
E8St "H" Street volumes Canaoity3
East of 1-8054 75,200 75,400
East of Hidden Vista Of.' 56,200 56,300
East of paseo Ranchero 43,600 56,300
West of Otay Lakes Rd.~ 42,400 56,300
East of Otay Lakes Rd.2 20,700 33,800
West of Corral Cyn Rd.2 13,400 33,800
East of Corral Cyn Rd. 16,200 33,800
, - 6 lane aection
2 - 4 lane section
3 _ '1'h1s column showa segunt design vol...s at LOS D Design capacity.
4 - 8 lane section
Based on the above noted information, East "H" st. is expected to
operate at an acceptable Level of Service for the near term.
MID-RANGE SCENARIO (HN'l'B .,\.ft',nlOluJl SR-125 BEPORT)
For the mid-range land development scenario identified in the
Feasibility Study for Interim SR-125 (HNTB Study), East "Hit st. is
projected to carry the following traf~ic volumes:
~ F)./ ;L~;2.
E. "H" street
Roadwav Seament:
East of I-8054
East of Hidden vistf'
West of Ps Ranchero
West of otay Lakes Rd.~
East of otay Lakes Rd'2
West of Corral Cyn Rd.
East of Corral Cyn Rd.2
West of SR-12S2
East of SR-125'
Projected
Traffic Volumes
LOS D
Design
CaD&citv3
70,000
54,000
4',000
35,000
25,000
.20,000
21,000
16,000
14,000
75,400
56,300
56,300
56,300
33,800
.33,800
33,800
33,800
56,300
, - 6 lane .ection
2 - 4 lane .ection
3 - This column shows segment design volumes at LOS D Design capacity.
4 - 8 lane section
As noted from the information shown in this table, projected
traffic volumes are within the design LOS D range which is
projected to meet the City's current ~hreshold Standards.
CIRCOLATION IMPROVEMENTS
Although the projected traffic volumes on East "H" st. are within
its design threshold capacity, there are some high volume
intersections that warrant special treatment to provide additional
capacity. The current Capital Improvement Program (CIP) includes
the following East "H" st. related projects:
1. East "H" St./I-805 interchange - a project is proposed which
would provide ramp widening, street widening (at the
interchange for the south side of the street), restriping and
signal improvements.
2. Otay Lakes Rd. at East "H" St. - a project is proposed to
provide dual left turn lanes for northbound and southbound
traffic on otay Lakes Rd. at East "H" Street. '!'his will
improve traffic conditions on East "H" St. by allowing traffic
signal (green) time, currently used by left turning traffic on
Otay Lakes Rd., to be made available for assignment to Bast
"H" st. traffic.
3. East "H" st ./paseo de.l Rey - a project is under construction
to widen the south side of East "H" st. at paseo del Rey to
provide an acceleration and deceleration lane at the
intersection and to provide dual left turn lanes eastbound to
northbound at the signalized mid-block entrance to the It-Mart
in the Rancho del Rey Commercial Center.
A future project is also proposed to widen East "H" St. to provide
additional auxiliary freeway and shopping center access between I-
/' )1/;2~3
805 and Hidden .Vista Drive. Because it is not known at this time
when, or if, traffic growth wi11 require construction of these
additiona1 1anes, the project has not been added to the City'. five
year schedule for CIP projects. As development occurs and
increasing traffic volumes indicate the need for additional
capacity, the project will be added to the CIP schedule.
As development in the eastern territories continues, the City's
circulation system will continue to expand through the land
development process. The rate of development wi11 be tied to the
capacity of the area's street system and regulated through the
issuance of building permits.
To insure that there are sufficient funds to add capacity to the
City's circulation system by modifying existing roadways, extending
existing roadways or building new roads, the Transportation
Development Impact Fee (TDIF) Program and the Eastern Chula Vista
Transportation Phasing Plan are regularly updated to reflect the
most recent land use plans associated with development in the
eastern territory. Update of the TDIF Program includes developing
new DIF boundaries, establishing a list of facilities needed to
develop the land uses within these boundaries, establishing the
total benefit area and making recommendations for a proposed fee
structure.
OTAY LAKES RD. IE. "B" ST. 1ft) 'l'ELEGRAPH CANYON RD. )
GMOC CONCERNS
The GMOC statement of concern is as follows:
Although presently operating rdthin the Standard, this section
of Otay Lakes Rd. is a concern as it has deteriorated from LOS
C to LOS D since last year. This segment should therefore
remain a focus in all subsequent 'l'HPs in the form of an annual
status report. 2'hat status report should address the
effectiveness of the interim signal timing adjustments
proposed in the 1993 'l'HP (or other r_edial measures), as well
as the schedule for related funding under the 7'ransDIF for
construction of the needed six-lane faCility.
BXISTDfG CONDITIONS
otay Lakes Rd. fr01ll East "H" st. to Telegraph Canyon Rd. is
designated as a six lane prime arterial in the Circulation Element
of the General Plan. It is currently striped for two through lanes
in each direction with traffic si;na18 at East "H" st., Gotham st.
and Telegraph Canyon Road. The curb-to-curb width of this section
of otay Lakes Rd. varies fr01ll 60' wide at East "H" st. to 86' wide
at Telegraph Canyon Road.
~ /'7---,2 91
Traffic counts taken in 1994 show AnT volumes of 18,580 between
East "H" st. and Gotham st. and 16,850 between Gotham st. and
Telegraph Canyon Road. The speed limit on this portion of Otay
Lakes Rd. is 40 MPH.
Field data obtained during the 1994 TMP, showed the following
Levels of Service which exist as an average condition during each
of the two hour study periods shown:
AM Period Mid-Day PM Period
otav Lakes Rd. Seament ~. .LOS (MPHl LOS (MPH) LOS (MPH)
E. "H" st.- Tel.. Cyn. Rd. NB C (22.2) C (26.6) D (21.9)
S8 8 (29.9) B (32.3) C (24.7)
Another study of this segment of Otay Lakes Rd. was done in
February 1995 during the hours from 3 PM to 7 PM to determine LOS
values for a longer time period than the normal two hour PM peak
period (4 PM to 6 PM) studied for the 1994 TMP. This study
provided the following LOS data for Otay Lakes Rd. between East "H"
St. and Telegraph Canyon Rd. on an hourly basis:
Travel Time
~ jUx. LOS (MPH) (Min. :Sec.)
3 PM - 4 PM NB C (22.7) 1:41.9
S8 C (27.8) 1.23.3
4 PM - 5 PM NB C (23.4) 1 : 39.1
S8 C (24.8) 1:33.4
5 PM - 6 PM NB C (22.3) 1:43.8
S8 C (24.1 ) 1.:36.2
6 PM - 7 PM NB D (19.0) 2:02.1
S8 B (30.3) 1:16.3
From this information, it can be seen that during the late
afternoon/evening period, only the northbound direction of this
segment of Otay Lakes Rd. operates at LOS D. This LOS D condition
is due to congestion at the intersection of Otay Lakes ad. and Bast
"H" Street. Thi8 conge8tion is caused by a heavy left turn demand
for traffic on Otay Lakes Rd. and can be eliminated by widening
Otay Lakes Rd. at the inter8ection to provide dual left turns for
northbound and 8outhbound traffic. .
It should be noted at this time that Otay'Lakes Rd. i8 classified
a8 a Class I arterial by the Traffic Monitoring Program's annual
study. Thi8 means that LOS D traffic conditions will occur at a
higher average travel speed than LOS D conditions that might occur
for the Class III arterial streets that are located west of I-80S.
For a Class I arterial, LOS D will occur when average travel speed
7 J'l/2'l5
drops below 22 MPH. Therefore, from the information shown in the
table above, it can be seen that small variations in average travel
speed may cause the LOS for northbound traffic on this segment of
Otay Lakes Rd. to vary between LOS C and LOS D.
DAR-TERM SCENAlUO (ECVTPP)
In the near term land development scenario identified in the
ECVTPP, if all approved projects.are built, Otay Lakes Rd. between
East "H" st. and Telegraph Canyon Rd. is projected to carry 23,300
vehicle trips per day.
IIZD-JlAHGE SCENAlUO (HNTB Drl'ERIM SR-125 REPORT)
For the mid-range land development scenario identified in the
Interim SR-125 (HNTB) study, if all approved projects are built,
traffic volumes are projec.ted to be 33,000 vehicle trips per day.
Depending on economic trends and the rate of development in the
eastern terri tories, this level of development is expected to occur
in the years 2007 to 2009.
The six lane prime classification for Otay Lakes Rd. can be
expected to handle up to 50,000 trips per day at a design LOS C
level of capacity provided dual left turn lanes are constructed.
Based on the information noted above, Otay Lakes Rd. will be
operating at an acceptable LOS for the near term and mid-range
levels of land development studied in the ECVTPP and Interim SR-125
study.
CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENTS
At the present time, Otay Lakes Rd. is operating at acceptable
Levels of Service. However, during the morning and evening periods
for the northbound direction of travel, average travel speeds
indicate a borderline LOS C/LOS D condition due to congestion at
the East "H" St./Otay Lakes Rd. intersection. Small changes in the
average travel speed for this direction of travel could cause the
segment to fail to meet Threshold standards in the near future.
For this reason, a CIP project is planned which will widen Otay
Lakes Rd. at East "H" st. to provide dual left turn lanes for
northbound and southbound traffic at the intersection. This
project would relieve existing congestion at the intersection and
improve Level of Service for Otay Lakes Road.
~ /9/.21t
PALOMAR ST. fr-5 TO BROADWAY)
GMOC CONCERNS
The GMOC statement of concern is as follows:
Although presently operating within the Standard, this section
of Palomar st. 1s a concern as it has deter10rated from LOS C
to LOS D s1nce last year. :'h1s sect10n should therefore
remain a focus 1n all subsequent DIPs 1n the form of an annual
status report:. :'hat status report should also address the
effect1veness of the proposed improvements as 1dent1f1ed 1n
the 1993 'l'HP.
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Palomar st. from 1-5 to Broadway is designated as a six lane major
street in the General Plan. It is currently striped for two
through lanes in each direction between 1-5 and Industrial Blvd.
and for three through lanes in each direction with a raised median
island between Industrial Blvd. and Broadway.
Between Industrial Blvd. and Broadway, a six lane widening project
was recently completed which included the construction of a new
traffic signal at the Palomar Trolley Center (shopping center)
entrance and the relocation of an existing traffic signal from the
MTDB trolley station entrance east to Murrell Drive. After
completion of these improvements, curb to curb width for this
portion of the roadway now varies from 90' to 100'. For Palomar
st. between 1-5 and Industrial Blvd., the width of existing
improvements varies from 55' to 69' within a Right-of-Way which
varies from 70' to 82' in width.
Existing ADT volumes are 34,280' between 1-5 and Industrial Blvd.
and 24,350 between Industrial Blvd. and Broadway.
Field data obtained during the 1994 TMP, and prior to the widening
project, revealed that Palomar st. from 1-5 to Broadway is
operating at acceptable Levels of Service as noted in the table
below:
Palomar S~. Seame~~
~.
AM Period
LOS (MPH)
Mid-Day
LOS (MPH)
PM Period
LOS (MPH)
%-5 NB Ramps - Broadway. EB
WB
B (19.5)
B (23.5)
C (18.2)
C (17.7)
C (15.2)
C (14.9)
During the AM peak period (7 AM to 9 AM) this represents an
increase in Level of Service for the eastbound direction of travel
from the LOS C (18.7 MPH) value recorded during the 1993 TMP; the
LOS and average travel speed for the westbound direction (from the
'993 TMP study) was LOS B (23.6 MPH). For t~e PM peak period (4 PM
~)J---2//
to 6 PM), both directions of travel showed an improvement in
average travel speed from the previous year which recorded LOS D
(12.7 MPH) for eastbound traffic and LOS C (13.6 MPH) for westbound
traffic. Since this data was collected before Palomar st. was
widened to six lanes, we anticipate improved Levels of Service when
this segment is studied for the 1995 TMP.
DEVELOPMENT PLANS
Since the area west of I-80S is already developed, changes in
existing land use will only occur through the redevelopment
process. When development patterns in the City shift to buildout
conditions, Palomar st. is projected to carry 38,000 trips per day
between 1-5 and Industrial Blvd. and 32,000 trips per day between
Industrial Blvd. and Broadway.
The six lane major classification for Palomar st. can be expected
to carry up to 40,000 trips per day at a design LOS C level of
capacity. Based on the information noted above, the existing six
lane segment of Palomar st. between Industrial Blvd. and Broadway
is expected to operate at an acceptable Level of Service.
Projected traffic volumes indicate, however, that the segment
between 1-5 and Industrial Blvd. will need to be widened to six
lanes to operate at an acceptable Level of Service at buildout
conditions.
CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENTS
There are currently two projects under consideration for the
Palomar st. traffic corridor. One project would focus on the
improvements needed on Palomar St. between 1-5 and Industrial
Boulevard. The second project would focus on the ultimate
improvements needed at the I-s/Palomar st. interchange. The
scheduling of these two projects is contingent on the availability
of funds.. Council has already approved funding to perform
preliminary design studies for the two projects.
CONCLOSIONS
At the present time, Palomar st. is operating at acceptable Levels
of Service. In the long term, the ultimate improvements installed
between Industrial Blvd. and Broadway are expected to handle the
traffic volumes projected for buildout conditions. For the segment
between 1-5 and Industrial BlVd., projected increases in traffic
volumes for buildout conditions will eventually require widening
the street to six lanes to provide the additional capacity needed
to serve future traffic demands.
~ 1?-:2; JY
SR-125
GMOC CONCERNS
~he GMOC statement of concern is as follows:
!'he importance of SR-725 to supporting buildout of the
projects in the City's General Planning Area consistent with
the '1'raffic !'hreshold has been previously established by both
the City's Growth Management plans and the ECV'l'PP. In light
of the uncertainty of CAL!'RANS and C2'V constructing SR-725 in
a timely manner, the GMOC supports the SR-725 interim facility
planning efforts contained in the HN7'B report, but reCOlD1lJends
that further and more detailed study of the San Miguel and
Sweetwater road segments of that plan occur. !'his effort is
necessary to ensure adequate community input and publiCity,
and avoid potential adverse reaction which could delay
.implementation due to various neighborhood impacts and school
safety .issues.
Dft'ElUM SR-125 PROGRAM
Zn December of 1993, the City Council adopted the interim SR-125
Development Zmpact Fee and approved the collection of fees
commencing January 1, 1995 to fund construction of the facilities
within the program.
~he interim SR-125 plan, referred to as a ~-SR-125 plan, conai.t.
of .even road .egments (.ee Exhibit 2) which, when con.tructed in
conjunction with other ~ansportation DZP funded roads, would
provide .ufficient capacity to maintain acceptable Level. of
Service on Chula Vista .treets until approximately 2007. ~he .even
.egments include existing roads (Sweetwater Rd., Bonita Rd. and San
Miguel Rd.), and "gap" road. (SR-125 corridor and Proctor Valley
Road). "Gap" road. are roads neces.ary to bridge the gap between
East "B" st. and San Miguel Road. ~hey are not part of Chula
Vi.ta'. General Plan Circulation Element.
The goal of the pre-SR-125 program i. to provide a "aafety valve"
in the event either the toll road or a freeway i. not con.truct.d
in time to .ati.fy the road .y.tem capacity n.ed. a..ociat.d with
growth. ~he San Miguel Rd., Sweetwater Rd. and Proctor Vall.y Rd.
a.gments that would provide a connection to SR-54 will probably not
be n.eded until the year 2000; ther.fore, there will be auffici.nt
time to aolicit public input into the planning proc.... %n the
.ean time, the City ia awaiting the outcome,of the SR-125 '1'011 Road
SZR proce.s. The SZR i. expect.d to be completed by June 1995. At
that time we will have 1II0re information available on projected
traffic impact. and mitigation measures proposed for thia area.
Zn addition to the traffic information provided in the Stat.'. SR-
125 ~oll Road EIR relative to the San Miguel/Sweetwater ar.a, a
traffic impact study ia also being performed for the Otay Ranch
Y/~/;<'7~
SPA I. Furthermore, the owners of San Miguel Ranch have indicated
a desire to proceed with their development. They too would produce
a traffic impact study which would include the San
Migue~/Sweetwater area.
The ElR'S for these two projects, coupled with the State SR-125
ElR, will identify traffic impacts and proposed mitigation .easures
for the Sweetwater area whether SR-125 is built as a toll road or
an interim facility, and will provide area residents with ample
time to review and comment on the projected traffic volumes for
their area.
Attachments:
Exhibit 1 - Near Term Scenario Circulation Network
Exhibit 2 - Interim SR-125 Study Circulation Network
SM:am
Pile: TF-215
C:\SM\WP\94GMOC5.SM
/
~ /7-]~
~
"'-.
~
\
'-.J
~
"
"
,"
&x/'ibi f ~
NE'~R TER~
:...wi.. ...:
, ..... '\ ~~~.,..... (~"'"'' 'Sc:-.etJAR\O
'='...1 ~tt." ~ / \',,0..." I,.. ~t. ,.~~~
'# . '6....~ ",. ,." e. -.",/.-. .. ~ t' ....,.
~ i .. 1 ~. .-.;;~.-....... / ' .......~a_ ., " ,... ',,\ ~
,.-( .. 4"~ .T/ -.............,.
~~. t.. ..'~ /., .~. .,. ,c. ~':~
", ''''lot;, ':~ . ~ ..' . .. ...... tll:.' t~"
: ,.f' ~ '~"; ,"" ,';: -.' ,.., . .... ',. . '. ....
\, ~ 't ,':' 't f' ~.~.. ~ .~. . ." ...
, 1 ,,)/ ' 1. ~ f.,,'" "..~', :: ~..~ tJ '.
.. ;.' i : ;,.,..r \ ...." ' .,: . 1Il . It
.~" i \ ....'." '. f ~....... ,..~..., '. "'. ... b " ~" 'I
/\ 1....( \ \ .;""1 foi. OS V_Rel...'/ 1 " ..' f.k< ," ~. ~~,
i." \ " t Y' , c. ~ /.,. .' l ;' '!I.' :-014 "
......, ' :. ~,' ': \ . ,...~ ...': ...... . ,-" 'tJl""':.. t t
, ,., .~.. t '\ . .,.\... ,. . i /\ .. .".J ,.'"-......
~ '\ ,~.. \ " ...~.., ... I,. ....... ., '(r"'" \~.,- ,.,,'11
'. .,"j , ...:i."', j,. ....... .... '. . ., "81
".' \ . "'i"-'''~'. '- .'. . .1.,,"- "
\ \ I........ v~1I\.... ~ 4S . . "'rl'l..... ,:;;
\....\...\: _~, J.~..$~~ .' . .;''.....,. \ ,""'; ,~..... 1.;::;111
. ,'.?' ...."..1' Dr ; . .._ '- " ~ I~ ,.....11
': \.'''' \ ...H' i \,,""" j" " 'J "I' ddR' '. '.I'~ ,. I;
",'T ,,It.. \ I..' a&t1Jr...jt.. .. er I .'" "
. \. I ;,1 \ "f"'). , \""1.. .... ~ ..f I ~ \.....,..;.., . ....". 7 ~ ~ LEGEND
'.,. ....\'" " ...k. i ;,.,,\ \ \r.....,'S.i:x'ttJ.f.~~S i ",\ ./.....
\\,..., ~. \ '\ ,,' \ ' ).'l . ..~. ..\\ " 1. ~ .. II. ADT ".1.....
'\ j '", ,,..~, '\' \"..,,, '\ "...,.....~'\.t.,..........-~) ~.~..
r''''; 1 l' ,,' 1 ,,' l ~.. 'f" I ~. ~
\ .' \ .\..., ~,.., ,,' \ o'!\'~ \ ~,., '.)o...L..-......I..
Jr" \ .. .. yr , \ ....\.~ '-, · " I' " ..-
. N 1 "'. .... .......oJ
\.<, . ." ..' \ '"..r" \\ \ \
",..,..\~ \ \"'. 1..... \/,\\ \ I
4"; '\ ~,....\ ' "....... \; ", .. ~ .
'" "\' I' ,''l '\\....
\ ....... \..'t: V"', ..( ~:'~.:
...\ . "V', ,.. l,r I. io. T
I' 'I ,;1-' 1 1 ,.,,, ~ ,,'r ":.\\;
\ .,,),'''~. \ ..\ro\" \. :' '-. t\{ ill
\' \ ,n' 1 \ .." \ '.!, I .
\ .. \. ,';, ~ ! I' I
, ",0\'" \ . \,"\ " ',.: .' ." f1
.
'f'
..
\
:.f'
.' !
,.. ;
..'i
'0':\"" '\1
. 11 " . to -,'
.. 1.,'....,.,
...i!'
. ....
r
to'!' '
'1.!"
.
t
I
II .. ., 'I .
-.-.-
............
...-...
So..irce.
S'tu', No.
,. 5..1,
",ee.", N.,
,. 5,.1,
',ojee. ,1'1
S,.d, At"
A.C
D
E
F
.ADT II. I........,
RA.NCIIO ,IH'.toRR\'.1
. SPA . ^ ~l F. N D ~: N .." "
PIpre 6-2
.... UdM (PltR .125) STUDY AREA CONDmONS
WITH PROPOSED PROJECT
III
~.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
f:-1IP-iE'2MUrNl> t)ev~'
'6~rvAA'O
.
.......... .HIt.......... ''tIC .. ............htC,., N...",.... &wtelynt
.
. ..
....IIIT
__lIlT .
UPPER Of"
RlKllYOIl
=:v81"
.
~
-W-1N1EItSTAll
-@)- STATE ItOU1'E
__. STATE ItOU1'E its COltQ)OIt
CITY STIIEET
o FILL ..lIllell';'
D PARTIAL IdkMANGE
CITY IPICIlL OF INF1.l.ENCE
No Scale
..
. .
JIIprc SJ.2a . Cl . "laD NIlMIIUJ I ,.s- Iar 161.... o..J r'. -,
EXHIBIT .z
)1~ 3tJ;L 60W?:e: 1I1J7B rllkrihl
'5R /~5 IJ'tpl)rl- ti-k.
APPENDIX K
)9 <JtJ3
MEMORANDUM
March 30, 1995
TO:
The Growth Management Oversight Commission
VIA:
"
John D. Goss, City Manager .I
Jess Valenzuela, Director of Parks and RecreatiofiY'''>~
Compliance with the Parks and Recreation Threshold Standard - July I, 1993 to June 30,
1994
FROM:
SUBJECT:
The Department is pleased to present a report on Parks and Recreation activities relating to the Parks and
Recreation Threshold Standard in the Growth Management Ordinance. A report was previously given
to the GMOC in March of 1994. This report is structured to provide the following information:
. FY 93/94 Department Overview
. Discussion of GMOC Issues of 1993/1994
. Review of Park Deficiency From Standard
DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW
The Department completed or conunenced the following projects during the review period:
1. Otay Park (PR- 133): Funds approved for the preparation of a Master Plan.
2. Lorna Verde Pool Recirculation (PR-134): Funds approved for the renovation of the circulation
system at Lorna Verde Pool to maintain health and safety standards set forth by the State.
3. Parkway Complex Renovation - Phase I (PR-162): Funds approved for the renovation of the
gymnasium and pool restroom/dressing rooms including heating, ventilation and plumbing. All
ADA signage and accessibility acconunodations will be made during this phase. An Architect
was secured in January, to modify the existing construction drawings, which are now going
through plan check. Staff expects constuction will conunence in September, 1995.
4. Parks Implementation Plan (PR-I64): Work Program approved with $10,000 in funding for a
professional research firm to perform a telephone survey of residents west of I-80S.
5. Rohr Park - Phase III (PR-166): Design and construction of curbs and gutters for the sports field
parking lots; equestrian fencing; parking lot landscaping; curbs and gutters for Rohr Manor, the
service yard and service road driveways has been completed.
6. Women's Club Renovation - Phase I (PR-J74): Renovation of building entrance (ramp) for
ADA, new paint, floor refinishing, door repairs, and construction of an accessible unisex
bathroom completed.
(gmoc . gmcx;3.rpt)
/
/7- Jt1l1(
Growth Management Oversight Commission
March 30, 1995
7. Hilltop Park Improvements (PR-175): Demolition of existing restroom and tot ]ot area in the
interior of the park and the relocation of the restroom to a more visible area and installation of
new play equipment; restoration of a falling slope adjacent to the church parking ]ot - completed.
8. McCandliss - Phase II (PR-177): Master Plan prepared and approved. Construction documents
being prepared; civil engineering plan completed. Phasing for project will be determined based
on available funds and scope of each phase.
9. Rohr Park - Phase III (PR-180): Funding approved for construction of a new play area to replace
the equipment. The Bonita Optimist Club purchased play equipment valued at $30,000 and the
City installed the equipment at the play area on Apache Hill.
10. Playground Renovation - Phase II (PR-183): Funding approved for play equipment at
Lauderbach Park.
II. Park Acquisition (PR-185): $250,000 in PAD funds added to this fund which brings the total
to approximately $805,000.
12. Chula Vista Community Park - This park was opened in late June 1994. All programs are now
operational and the joint-use agreement is in effect with EastLake High School.
GMOC RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 1993-1994
Recommendation I. That the City Council amend the Parks and Recreation Threshold Standard
to apply City-wide, both east and west of 1-805,
A report on mailers related to the threshold standard was considered by the Parks and Recreation
Commission on October 20, 1994, and was forwarded to the City Manager. The report is being reviewed
by senior staff and is being refined for presentation to teh City Council in the near future.
In addition to the threshold standard, the Parks Implementation Plan Work Task Force completed a report
on a proposed Park Equivalency Factor policy. The report encompasses an analysis which includes a
school park policy whereby school land would be utilized in a joint use with the City and counted as park
credit. The study includes an evaluation of usable school acreage, and a phasing plan of school park
development. It is anticipated that this report will be part of the PIP.
Recommendation 2.
That the City Council direct staff to expedite completion of the Parks
Implementation Plan (PIP), and eDSore that the PIP is a priority in the work
programs of the Phonning and Parks and Recreation Departments for the
next year;
lJmoc . JfTIoc3.rpt]
C;; ;fc:J/
Growth Management Oversight Commission
March 3D, 1995
Since the Council approved the PIP's preparation as a priority project in the work programs of the
Planning and Parks and Recreation Departments for FY 94/95, staff has been meeting weekly to research,
plan and develop the PIP. Staff anticipates completion of the draft PIP by Fall 1995.
Recommendation 3. That those sulH:omponents of the PIP which will fonn a basis for a revised
standard be directed for placement up-front in the aforementioned work
program to avoid continued delay in the adoption of a revised standard.
As noted under Recommendation I., the PIP work task force has completed reports regarding the
equivalency factors for recreation facilities, and a revised threshold standard. The equivalency factor
report will be part of the final PIP document.
Recommendation 4.
The City should create an impact fee program which will require new
apartment construction in Western Chula Vista to pay park fees.
Development of an impact fee program for apartments is part of the PIP work program previously
authorized by Council.
Recommendation 5.
New multi-family projects in western Chula Vista should be required to
provide a set amount of private recreation facilities within the development.
Provision of private recreation facilities by new multi-family projects in western Chula Vista is a work
component of the PIP. Recommendations will be made based on the outcome of the PIP's analyses.
Recommendation 6. The Parks and Recreation Department should continue to assess the
appropriateness of "mini-parks" in western Chula Vista.
An assessment of the appropriateness of "mini-parks" in western Chula Vista is a component of the PIP
as previously authorized by Council.
REVIEW OF PARK DEFICIENCY FROM STANDARD
Attached (Attachment "A") is a revised park deficiency statistics report. The numbers are slightly revised
from past years, based on population information provided by the City's Planning Department and the
State of California Department of Finance. As noted, the City continues to show a shortfall in park
acreage; however, with the installation of Chula Vista Community Park, the city-wide standard increased
from 2.17 acres per thousand to 2.22 acres per thousand (June 30,1993 to July 1, 1994). Also attached
("B") is an East/West Inventory as of April 1 , 1995.
JV:NEW:new
Attachments
"A" - Park Deficiency Statistics Report
"B" - East/West Inventory
[gmoc - gmoc3.rpt]
/
J7--JtJ;
CITY OF CHULA VISTA PARKLAND DEFICIENCY STATISTICS
January 1, 1992 July I, 1992 January I, 1993 June 30. 1993 January 1. 1994 July 1,1994 January I, 1995
Population - East 011-805 39.698 39,868 40,994 40,508 41,071 41,319 41,802
Acres 01 Parks - East of 1-805 190.5 190.5 190.5 190.5 203.4 203.4 203.4
Acres/I ,000 - East of I-80s 4.80 4.78 4.65 4.70 4.95 4.92 4.87
Acre Shortfell/Excess - East 011-805 71.41 70.90 67.52 68.98 80.19 79.44 77.99
Populalion - West of I-80s 102,080 102,518 IOS,413 106,792 108,276 108.933 110,204
Acres of Parks - West of 1-805 129.45 129.45 129.45 129.45 129.45 129.45 129.45
Acres/I ,000 - West 011-805 1.27 1.26 1.23 1.21 1.20 1.19 1.17
Acre Shortfall/Excess - West 011-805 -176.79 -178.10 -186.79 '-190.93 -195.38 -197.35 -201.16
Population - City-Wide 141,778 142.386 146,407 147,3OQ 149.347 150,252 152.006
Acres 01 Parks - City-Wide 319.95 319.95 319.95 319.95 332.85 332.85 332.85
Acres/I ,COO - City-Wide 2.26 2.25 2.19 2.17 2.23 2.22 2.19
Acre Shortfall/Excess - City-Wide -IOS.384 -107.208 -119.271 -121.95 -115.19 -117.91 -123.17
Acres 01 Parkland - Standard - City-Wide 425.334 427.158 439.221 441.9 448.04 450.76 456.02
""- For every 1 acr. For every 1 acre For every 1 acre For every 1 acre For every 1 acre For every 1 acre For every 1 acre
"'fJ 01 parkland per 01 parkland per of parkland par 01 parkland per 01 parkland per 01 parkland per 01 parkland par
\ 1 000 resldenls In 1000 residents in 1000 residents in 1000 residents in 1000 residents in 1000 residents in 1000 residents in
~ the west. there the west, there the west, there the west. there the west. there the west. there the west, there
are: are: are: are: are: are: are:
~ 3,78 3.78 3.78 3.88 4,14 4.14 4.14
"'J acres per 1 000 acres per 1 000 acres per 1 000 acres per 1 000 acres per 1 000 acres per 1 000 acres per 1 COO
In the east in the east in the east in the east in the east in the east in the east
FOOTNOTE: Doesn't take into account facilities (pools. gymnasiums, amphitheaters) available in the park acreage in the City.
[GMOC - gmocdel.wc
13-Apr-95]
EASTIWEST PARK INVENTORY
as of April 1, 1995
City of Chula Vista
EAST OF 1-805
WEST OF 1-805
Park Acreage Park Acreage
Discovery Park 14.5 Eucalyptus Park 19.8
Greg Rogers Park 52.1 "]" Street Marina 21.4
Rohr Park 62.2 Bay Blvd. Park 1.5
Bonita Long Canyon 12.5 Friendship Park 8.4
Halecrest Park 2.0 Hilltop Park 10.9
Independence Park 4.1 Lauderbach Park 4.0
Paseo del Rey Park 3.0 Lorna Verde Park 6.2
Rancho del Rey Park 10.2 Los Ninos Park 5.2
Sunbow Park 4.0 Marina View Park 4.5
Sunridge Park 6.0 Memorial Park 8.0
Terra Nova Park 8.5 Norman Park 1.7
Tiffany Park 7.2 Orange A venue Fields 4.0
Valle Lindo Park 4.2 Otay Park 5.2
Chula Vista Reinstra Ball 6.0
Community Park 12.9 Fields
Palomar Park 3.1
SDG&E Park 18.0
Conno1ey Park .65
.
Holiday Estates I .26
Holiday Estates II .26
Lancerlot Park .10
Sherwood Park .28
203.4 129.45
(gmoc . parkinv3.lab .03-30-95]
/9~JtJY
APPENDIX L
/5/307
f-/} -It;;
DRAFT
;
.
,
PARKS AND RECREATION
3.7 Parks and Recreation
DRAFT.-~ .~
r ,...--.?
._ .J- I
3.7.1 Existine Threshold Policv
Goal
To provide a diverse and flexible park system which meets both the active and
passive recreational needs of the citizens of Chula Vista.
Obiective
Provide public park and recreational opportunities in a timely manner, implementing
a five-year master plan which describes the location, facility improvements, and
funding program for proposed neighborhood and community parks.
Threshold Standard
Population ratio: Three (3) acres of neighborhood and community park land with
appropriate facilities shall be provided per 1,000 residents G~tY111f49l.) east sf IRterstate
~.
Implementation Measures
The amount of existing public park land and recreationalfacilitieslooated west of
1-805 are a result of historic developmentpattems that have occurred since the city's
incorporation, including the aimexation of the MontgOllleryccimmun~tYitlto the city.
Implementation of the threshold standard withmareaS west ofl~805 should be
viewed as an ultimate goal as part ofa city-wide master plan . for parks and
recreation, however, it needs tei be recognized that thesatisfactioD of this standard
may require significant resources that can oilly be amasSed over 1ime and therefore
should be viewed uniquely. . . .
Should the GMOC determine that the Threshold Standard is not being satisfied east
or west of 1-805, then the City Council shall formally adopt and fund tactics to bring
the park and recreation system into conformance.
Because opportunities enstto keep pace with DeW development and population
growth in areas east of 1.805 G construction or other actual solutions for this area
shall be scheduled to commence within three years. If construction of needed new
park and recreation facilities is not started within three years of the deficiency
reported by the GMOC, then the City Council shall, within 60 days of the GMOC's
report, schedule and hold a public hearing for the purpose of adopting a moratorium
)~- 3/1/
_ _ r"
~, a
'-~ I
on the acceptance of new tentative map applications ~~~~9~Jr~?, based on all of
the following criteria: .. ... .
1. That the moratorium is limited to an area wherein a causal relationship to the
problem has been established; and,
2. That the moratorium provides a mitigation measure to a specifically identified
impact.
Should a moratorium be established, the time shall be used to expeditiously prepare
specific mitigation measures for adoption which are intended to bring the condition
into conformance. Any such moratorium shall be in effect until construction of the
needed new park and recreation facilities has commenced.
)c;-;J/ /
.1
(
"
APPENDIX M
)9/'3/:2-
GROWTH FORECAST DATA FOR USE IN PREPARING REPORTS TO THE GMOC-
1994 REVIEW CYCLE:
In-lieu of the standard annual City Planning Department 12-18 month and 5-7 year
residential development forecast report, the following information and attached tables
should be used.
12-18 Month Forecast Data-
The attached tables reflect high-end or "worst case" projections for residential
development activity, by water district area (east / west of 1-805), for the period from
July 1994 through December 1995. They were derived principally from developer
surveys. and City development processing records as of 8/1/94.
By comparison, a low-end projection (based on trends as evidenced by continuing
recession over the last 24 to 30 months) indicates 891 units to be issued permits, and
909 units to be occupied over the same time period. These equate to annual averages
of 594 units, and 606 units respectively.
5-7 Year (1994-2000) Forecast Data-
Based principally on data employed in developing the SANDAG Series 8 forecasts,
following are average annual residential development volumes anticipated over the next
5-7 years. .
. Approximately 100 units/yr ave. for infill development in western Chula Vista
(Sweetwater Authority service area).
. Approximately 810 units/yr. ave. for new developments within the City's existing
sphere-of-influence in eastern Chula Vista (Otay service area).
This volume is projected to rise to as much as 1510 units/yr. ave. between the
years 1996 and 2000 based on commencement of development in the Otay
Ranch project.
(A IGMDC.94\RESFRCST SHT)
)9.<J/3
OHI!'A VISTA - OTAV mSTRICT
12-IH MONTIIIIOlISING UNIT FORFCAST
.HILV 1'1'14 - IJFCF'MRF'R 1'1'15
MAl'
III
A
II
C
II
I'.
I'.
"..... (;
"t:I
~ II
I
'- J
~
JIIIY - DlnMIlI R 1'19.1 'ANlI\RY _ .IIeNl IC)I).c; .1111.\ - IIHTMIII'R 19'15 IR MONTII roRITASI
ISSIII'. fiNAl ISSI If- IIN." ISSIIf FINAl. H>I'AI n>l'AI
PROJI'.CT MI'. sr Mr SI MI Sf Mr Sf MI Sf Mr sr ISSIIU) FINAl I'll
IIRI'.IIMHRRA NOVA 41) I) fin I) 'N n ~n I) I) I) .lf, I) '1R 14(,
I'.ASTI.AKI' II "GRU'NS" 25 1(,(, I) 1211 ~I .lOfl J(, 211 R 124 IN 21-1 M4 615
R.IlR. SPA I I) 22ft I) 2-1? I) 1.17 I) l)5 I) I.IR I) 14(, 52J 4R1
R.lI.R. SPA II I) .1R I) It. I) .12 I) .17 I) IR I) .14 NR R7
R.II.R. SPA III I) I) I) I) I) JI) I) I) I) JI) I) JI) (,f) :w
SAI.1TRRK I J6 :.n n 12 41) 1'1 Jf, 2J TR 17 41) I" IR1 1(17
s^' .1TRI'EK RANCII 0 I) 0 0 I) I) 100 0 100 I)
SIINIIOW 0 0 I) 0 I) I) I) 0 I) 0 0 0 I) I)
TEl HiRAPH CANYON ESTS. 51 RI R4 (,I W 71 174 2n
SAN MIGUEl. RANCH 0 0 I) 0 I) I) I) I) 0 0 I) 0 0 0
MISe. OTHF.R 0 0
TOTAI.S 101 506 R7 4R"! "" (,12 In 417 5(, 476 94 514 IR70 1741
NOTL nilI' TO RECENT CHANGES IN PROJF.CT OWNI'.RSHIP. SAN MIGIIU. RANCH ANI) SIINIIOW ARr NOT I'XPITTI'.I).
HI HAVI' ANY PERMIT ACTIVITY WITIIIN THI'. roRECAST r1MII'RAML
A \GMt'" - 'l4\OFOR7_94WB1
August t
"--
~
\
Y
~
OlliLA VISTA - SWEETWATER DISTRICT
12-IH MONTH HOlISIN(; (INIT FORECAST
.HILY 1"'14 - IlECEMIlER 19'1~
MAr
I1J
I
2
3
JIIIY -IJHTMIlIR 1'1'/.1 'ANll!\RY -.11 INI. 11)1)5 .II II)' - DITI-:MBrR 1()()~ IK MIJNTIIIOIHTASI
1""1. rlNAI IS'" I' HNAI ISSIII HNAI I"IAI 101,\1
rROJH, MF SI MI SI MI SF MI SF MI sr MF SI "SIIFIl HNAlm
--
nONrlA IIILLS FXJT. ISIS n /I n n 7 n 7 n
IlATF rALM VII.I.AS (256I'ALM) /I /I n /I 0 0 0 n
I. ST. MANOR 0 n 110 /I n 110 16 II.
Mise OTIIER I 2 In n n n II. n 0 0 10 I 3M
IIlTAIS 0 I 2 In 1/. n n II> n 7 I', 10 14 ~i.I
A \GMOC-94\OFOR7 _94.WB1
August 1994
GROWTH MANAGEMENT THRESHOLDS
12-18 MONTH DEVELOPMENT FORECAST
PROJECT LOCATION MAP
..........
'JJ
~
~
o
\
I
I
I
\
\---
r@
l___.,.__._.
I
o",y DI."'ICT
..... WATER DISTRICT IKXJNOAIY
MAJOR DEYELOPMINT PllOIICIS IN 12 - 18 MONTH FORECAST
~.~~.-
6
-
......-
.~
J
A
.
c
o
E
F
BRfHMTERRANOVA G
EASnAKE " "GRHNS" H
R.O.R. SPA I I
R.D_R. SPA" J
R.D.R. SPA 111
SALT CREEK I
WT CRmC: RANCH
~
TflEGIN'H CANYON mATES
SAN MIGUEL RANCH
MISC. OTHER
,
o ",000'
err 01 O<<AA Vl:Sa. ADWHCII'lNHNG ON: ~.ti95 CJ.f
,-*-
APPENDIX N
Ji ~ 31?
DRAFT
DRAFT DEVELOPMENT MONITORING AND PHASING POLICY
4/26/95
BACKGROUND
Section 4 of the City's Growth Management Program contains policies regarding development
phasing which are responsive to location, timing, and fiscal and economic impacts of growth,
and whose goal is to ensure provision of public facilities and services concurrent with new
development so that threshold standards are met (see attached). Given the long lead times
necessary for the planning and financing of major infrastructure, such as the SR-125 facility, it
becomes increasingly important to evaluate the phasing of new development and the timing of
major capital improvement projects to make sure that facilities will be available when needed.
Therefore, the following Development Monitoring Policies are proposed to be established in
accordance with the City's adopted Growth Management Program, and would be in addition to
monitoring and evaluation requirements that are already in effect.
PURPOSE
To supplement eXlstmg development phasing policies in Section 4 of the City's Growth
Management Program, to further define how the City will evaluate the status of development
approvals in forecasting the timing and phasing of new development, and how this information
should be used in updating public facility plans. These additional measures are also intended
to ensure that the City, other service providers (e.g. school and water districts) and developers
become aware at the earliest possible time of any potential facility needs that will be required
in order to maintain adopted threshold standards.
POLICIES
I) In addition to the annual mid-range forecast, the Planning Department shall also prepare
and maintain a map and data base identifying all residential and non-residential projects
which fall into one of the following two categories:
a) projects for which the City has entered into a Development Agreement which
provides specific assurances to the developer regarding utilization of remaining
capacity within the transportation system ("Transportation Capacity Development
Agreement"). In addition, this category shall include projects which currently are
eligible for Transportation Development Impact Fee credits, either by virtue of
being included in an assessment district, or having obtained cash credits through
construction of major transportation facilities; and
b) projects for which a final map has been recorded, where said map gives the
developer the ability to record lots and develop the property without further
discretionary approvals, and for which all fees and exactions which are required
at the time of final map recordation have been paid ("Implementing Final Map. ")
J9-J/~
DRAFl
Development Phasing Policy
-2-
April 27, 1995
2) Future updates of the Eastern Chula Vista Transportation Phasing Plan shall take into
consideration all projects meeting the criteria listed in Policy #1 above, and will identify
all Circulation Element roadway improvements needed to support this level of
development, along with financing requirements.
3) As future projects are submitted to the City for recordation of an Implementing Final
Map or approval of a Transportation Capacity Development Agreement, they will be
evaluated to determine what additional roadway improvement needs they will generate,
in relation to the current Transportation Phasing Plan and the current listing of projects
meeting the criteria in Policy # 1. Prior to the City authorizing recordation of an
Implementing Final Map or approving a Transportation Capacity Development
Agreement, the developer will be required to demonstrate, to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer, that such additional roadway improvements, which will provide additional
capacity to the transportation system in Eastern Chula Vista, can and will be financed and
constructed prior to their need.
4) Similar development monitoring and evaluation will occur for other public facilities and
growth management factors (such as water conservation and air quality improvement)
covered in the City's Growth Management Program to ensure that all other public facility
and growth management considerations are taken into account.
5) In preparing traffic studies for Environmental Impact Reports, the "cumulative impact
analysis" shall, at a minimum, include one scenario which considers all projects with
approved tentative maps, as well as another scenario which considers all projects meeting
the criteria contained in Policy 1 above.
It is intended that the policies described herein will be adopted by the City through appropriate
amendments to the City's Growth Management Program and implementing ordinances.
(F : \home\Dlann i n~ Ide\'-ool)
!'}-.Jli
.
.
.
.
.
.
I
.
.
.
.
I
I
~
I
m
.
m
I
DEVELOPME~G
4.1 Phasinl: Policy
The purpose of this section is to discuss the various issues related to phasing of new
development, and to set forth projXlsed jXllicies related to development phasing which
need to be included in the projXlsed growth management program.
Location
One principal factor in an overall development phasing jXllicy is the location of new
major traffic facilities as well as related public facilities.
Existing development stretches from Interstate 805 to the east along major streets
such as East H Street and Telegraph Canyon Road. Both of these streets have been
improved in conjunction with new development to maintain adequate levels of
service. The location of future growth will most logically follow the same west to
east pattern along Orange Avenue corridor as well as the continued extension of East
H Street and future extensions of Palomar and Otay Valley Road. These major
west/east streets follow the tOjXlgraphic features of the land and, as such, are limited
in number and location.
Approved development, final and tentative subdivision maps, when built out will
form a continuous corridor of development from Interstate 805 to Upper and Lower
Otay Reservoir along the H Street/Telegraph Canyon Road corridor. Guiding future
growth into areas which can be best served by public facilities depends in large part
on the future plans to construct new major public facilities such as State Route 125,
water storage facilities, school facilities, as well as all other public facilities. The
Facility Master Plans will assist the City in evaluating the locational advantages and
disadvantages of future growth on a systematic basis.
The refinement of the location of future development will be made by subsequent
studies and individual project testing as pan of the revised development review
process. This process considers the following principles:
I . Realization of the imjXlnance of urban form in the development process,
i.e., the building of complete neighborhoods and communities so that
new residents become a pan of the broader community; and
2. Provision of a full complement of public facilities and services concurrent
with the needs of new development.
City of Chula VISta
4113191 ~ Growth Management Program
/1-;Jc2tJ
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DEVELOPMENT PHASING
Both of these principles are fundamental to achieving the locational objectives of a
development phasing policy. '
Because of these important principles, it is desirable to continually update and
monitor the locational phasing of development as new public and private facilities are
developed. The spatial pattern of Chula Vista will be dynamic and expanding in
future years. The locational principles to help guide this expansion and growth are
equal in importance to other planning considerations.
Timin!!
Another critical component of the overall development phasing policy is the timing
of future growth. The exact timing of development cannot be projected because of
the influences which are outside of the direct control of both the development
community and the City. However, reasonably accurate short-range (12-18 month)
and mid-range (5-7 year) forecasts of development can be made, based upon status
of development approvals, regional growth forecasts, and other factors.
The importance of timing to the overall development phasing policy is two fold:
I. It provides information to enable the public and private sector to focus their
efforts and energies on providing new facilities and services at the time they are
needed;
2. It provides the best means of comparing loca1development phasing with
regional growth forecasts and growth management strategies.
One of the major needs revealed by the Transportation Phasing Program update is the
lack of certainty in the City's ability to accommodate new growth without a definite
plan for the financing and scheduling of SR 125. Although Caltrans is currently
preparing an environmental report and route alignment study, it is clear that no state
funding will be available to construct SR 125 by the time it is needed to accommo-
date the buildout of the Chula Vista General Plan. There is a need to direct staff to
study the available alternative financing options and construction timing issues for SR
125. This is one example of the importance of timing to an overall development
phasing approach.
Fiscal/Economic
This component of the overall development phasing policy requires that the
development projects be measured against their ability to conform to the City's
overall fiscal and economics policies.. At the General Development Plan review, the
financial and economic impacts of the project when it is completely developed will
4123/91
)~~)
City of Chula Vista
Growth M(J1IJJgement Program
II
II
II
I)
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
DEVELOPMENT PHASING
be examined. Additionally, the review process will require that, at the Sectional
Planning Area Plan level, each development increment or phase of development be
analyzed for fiscal and economic impacts.
The fiscal analysis will evaluate the City's ability to operate, maintain and staff new
public facilities. The City's intent is to build new facilities only when increases in
revenues allow sufficient funding to operate, maintain and staff these new facilities.
The finance policies and economic priorities of the City shall be an integral part of
the development approval process.
Projects would be allowed to go forward once they demonstrate an ability to provide
revenues necessary to fund new public facilities required to serve the project or
guarantee additional funding to the City in the interim. The alternative is to wait to
develop until such time as the City has available funds to maintain and operate these
new facilities.
The fiscal/economic component of the development phasing policy should provide the
City with an evaluation of development phasing based, in part, upon the overall
utilization of public facilities. Considering and approving the most cost effective
development phasing plan for. the provision of public facilities and services within the
financial limitations, policies and debt ceiling established by the City is critically
important to ensuring that new development pays its own way.
Develooment Phasinl! Policies
The factors previous] y discussed support the adoption of development phasing policies
which are responsive to location, timing, and fiscal and economic impacts of growth.
Furthermore, previous direction by the City Council in the adopted Growth
Management Element is that the development phasing program should be "facilities-
driven;" that is, primarily responsive to the goal of providing public facilities and
services concurrent with new development, so that threshold standards are met.
Based on these factors, the following policies for development phasing are proposed
and shown with underlining:
1. Phasine of transoortation facilities shall be the major determinant of overall
public facility and development Dhasin~. With respect to various facilities
required for new development, the most complex and time-consuming ~ plan,
design, finance, and construct are major street facilities. Furthermore, other
major fixed facilities are either located in the street system (e.g., water
distribution, sewer collection, drainage, etc.) or require access to a street
system (schools, parks, tire stations, etc.).
- -
4123191
~
/7 / J~
City of Chula Vista
Growth MtllUlgemenr Program
,~
I~I
D
O'
g
~.
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
r
I
I
I
DEVELOPMENT PHASING
2. Other Dubhe facilities shall be phased in concert with the ohasinl1 of new
roadways. However, it should be recognized that location and timing
constraints on other public facilities may have an impact on the overall phasing
of development. For example, the current facility deficiencies in the Otay
Water District are affecting the timing of new development, independent of the
timing of street improvements in the same area.
3. Based on Dhasine of develooment which is consistent with an adopted
TransDOrtation Phasin~ Plan. and is also consistent with all other oublic facility
phasine plans or develQpment allocation olans. the City shall adQpt a 5 to 7
vear "development phasin~ forecast." In preparing this forecast, the City
considers the status of development approvals, the effect of binding develop-
ment agreements, and other indicators of the location and timing of future
development, including regional growth forecasts and policies. These
development forecasts shall be reviewed and updated annually by the Growth
Management Oversight Commission, and shall be adopted by the City Council.
4. The adopted "development phasine forPl'Jlst" shall be u!Wl as baseline
information in evaluation of new development pTOJKlsals. to evaluate the
cumulative imoact on DubHe facilities. As new projects are approved, the
development phasing forecast shall be modified to reflect the development
phasing of the approved project in relation to other approved projects. .
5. The adoDted "develooment ohasine forecast" shall be used in the oreoaration
of the City's Capital Improvement Pro~ram. and shall be forwarded to outside
a~encies and districts for facility planninl! purooses.
4.2 ~opment :ehasin~ Forecast
Based upon the overall development phasing plan and policies, the City is able to
begin to forecast where and when development will take place. This development
phasing forecast (5 to 7 years) can be used to effectively and efficiently manage
future development.
The management of future growth includes increased coordination of activities of the
various City departments as well as with both School and Water Districts which serve
the City of Chula Vista. The development phasing forecast will enable the City to
prioritize and maximize limited staff resources and focus efforts with special districts.
The first few years of the development phasing forecast will be accurate provided
there are no outside influences which effect overall the demand for new development.
The development phasing forecast is made by analyzing the development pipeline in
./23/91
/
/9/;3.23
City of Chula Vista
Growth Managemelll Program
----
DEVELOPMENT PHASING
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
I
relation to location, timing and fiscal/economic components of the overall develop-
ment phasing policy. The specific factors which effect the development phasing
forecast include the Otay Municipal Water District Allocation Program, State Route
125, the status of development approvals and binding development agreements.
These component are reviewed in conjunction with the requirement to provide
facilities and services concurrent with the demand created by new development to
maintain compliance with the threshold standards.
The development phasing forecast will be updated as facility improvements are made
and the capacity for new development becomes available. The later years of the
forecast are less accurate due to lower levels of development approval and
corresponding agreements to provide public facilities. These later years are subject
to change and will become more accurate as development entitlements increase and
public facilities are guaranteed.
A preliminary "development phasing forecast" based on this policy is shown on
Figure 36. The development phasing forecast projects that approximately 1,350
dwelling unitswiJl be issued annually for the next 7 years.
4123/111
~
;9"';5;2.7
. City of Chula Vista
Growth Maruzgement Program
I. DEVEWPMENT PHASING
1
Figure 36
1 Preliminary Development Phasing Forecast (S to 7 Years)
1 Residential I Industrial Commercial
Proiect Dwellinl! Units Acres Acres
I Rancho Del Rey ] 1,310 76.2 6.6
EastLake I 16 66.0 34.2
Ladera Villas 29
I Terra Nova 86
Woodcrest S.W. 54
I Canyon View 40
Olympic Training Center'
Rancho Del Rey II 567
I Salt Creek I 538
EastLake Greens 2,774 19.6
Sunbow 1,946 46.0 10.0
I Village Center (E.L.I.) 405
Montillo 353
Rancho Del Rey IlI3 1,380
I Totals !M2& ~ SM
I
!
The numh.:r or dw,lIi", uni1J shown IN &hole Nmaini11l 10 be pulled u of 1-1-90.
2
The OTC don not uquirc I Tcntllive Map. The approval include. 300 bod. for 81h1e....
3
Thil projc':l ....y b..: included dcpendi." on &be final rcsull of the tram, 11II1,ai. beina: coadue&Id .. plrt orlhc E.I.R on
lhi. pn'ljc':l.
-~ --
4123191
~
/'7 - 3.2~
City of Chula Vista
Growth MtllUlgement Program
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item eJ. tl
Meeting Date 6/20/95
ITEM TITLE:
Report on proposed procedure to ensure compliance with the Council
Policy requiring that the aggregate of all County taxes, Mello-Roos
school taxes, and assessment installments does not exceed 2% of the sale
price of a house.
Resolution / 7 93(, Making award for sale of bonds and
approving the Third Amendment to AcquisitionlFinancing Agreement
for Assessment District No. 94-1 (Eastlake Greens II) and authorizing the
Mayor to execute same.
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public Works ~
Director of Finance f1f\_
REVIEWED BY: City Manager~ b>\@)
The public improvements to be finance~ through Assessment District No. 94-1 include
backbone public facilities such as storm drain, sewer, water, reclaimed water, utilities,
landscaping, grading, and street surface improvements serving the Eastlake Greens II
development. At the May 23, 1995 meeting, Council approved the issuance of bonds and
authorized the Financial Consultant to solicit sealed bids for the sale of bonds in an amount
not to exceed $7,834,491. The proposed resolution awards the bond sale to the lowest bidder
and approves the Third Amendment to the AcquisitionlFinancing Agreement. This amendment
establishes the procedure to ensure compliance with the 2% Maximum Tax in AD 94-1. This
is the closing resolution for the legislative proceedings of AD 94-1.
(4/5ths Vote: Yes_NoX)
RECOMMENDATION: That Council:
1) Accept staff report on the procedure to ensure compliance with the "2%
Maximum Tax" Council Policy; and
2) Adopt the resolution awarding the sale of bonds, and approving the
Third Amendment to the AcquisitionlFinancing Agreement for AD 94-1.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable.
DISCUSSION:
The bonds for AD 94-1 are being issued pursuant to the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915".
Sealed proposals for the purchase of those bonds were received on June 20, 1995 at 9:30 a.m.
in the offices of Kadie-Jensen, Johnson & Bodnar (Financial Consultant). The Director of
Finance will have received the bids, and will give a verbal report at the time of the Council
meeting.
.,,(~-I
':2C?
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date 6/20/95
At the May 23, 1995 meeting, Council directed staff to bring to Council, prior to delivery of
bonds for Assessment District No. 94-1 (scheduled for June 29, 1995), a procedure to ensure
compliance with the Council Policy requiring that the aggregate of all County taxes, Mello-
Roos school taxes, and assessment installments does not exceed 2% of the sale price of a
house. This is known as the 2% Maximum Tax policy.
Reoort on the orocedure to ensure comoliance with the 2% Maximum Tax Policv
City policy requires that the combination of regular County taxes, Mello- Roos school taxes,
and assessment installments does not exceed 2% of the market value of the residential units.
The analysis considers all assessments/taxes in place at the time of the house sale. It does not
apply if after the sale of the house, additional school taxes/assessments are put on the property
by other agencies or the value of the property changes. In order to make sure that the 2%
criterion is met, it is necessary to establish a mechanism to ensure compliance as the houses
are sold. In addition, the adopted procedure should not create unreasonable administrative
work for either the City or the developer. As a result of the discussions between the City and
Eastlake, the following procedure has been proposed by Eastlake:
The Acquisition/Financing Agreement previously entered into between the City and Eastlake
is to be amended to include the following:
A) Eastlake will be responsible to provide for the funds, as may be necessary, to lower the
annual taxes and assessments obligation to meet the 2% Maximum Tax at the time of
the house sale.
B) Eastlake will include in any future agreement to sell all or any portion of the property
within the AD 94-1 for the purpose of constructing and marketing owner-occupied
residential dwelling unit (Builder/Developer Agreement), a provision requiring
inclusion of the following "escrow demand" in all builder sales in the Greens II:
I) At the close of each escrow, the Escrow Company shall use a "calculation formula"
previously approved by the City Engineer of the City of Chula Vista to determine the
aggregate of all annual County taxes, Mello-Roos taxes, and assessment installments to
be paid ("Total Taxes and Assessments").
2) If the Total Taxes and Assessments does not exceed the 2% of the sale price of the
house, no further action is required and the sale can proceed.
3) In the event the Total Taxes exceeds the 2% calculation, the Escrow Company will
make immediate demand upon Eastlake Development Company for the funds necessary
to lower the assessments and/or Mello-Roos or other special taxes as may be necessary
to meet the 2% Maximum Tax. These funds must be received by the Escrow Agency
prior to the close of escrow and will upon closing be immediately paid to the City of
Chula Vista or the corresponding public agency to lower the Total Taxes and
Assessments for the specific lot closed. The Escrow Agency will notify the City the
amounts to be paid to the different public entities.
.2 () ~ el.
Page 3, Item ;l.()
Meeting Date 6/20/95
C) Prior to the start of sale for a specific subdivision, Eastlake will submit to the approval
of the City Engineer the "calculation formula" and "escrow demand" to be used during
escrow to estimate the Total Taxes and Assessments for each of the different housing
plans within the development.
Staff has reviewed Eastlake proposal and recommends Council approval. This procedure
would ensure compliance with the Council policy at the time of sale and would demand a
minimum amount of staff administration and follow-up.
Resolutions
Tonight's action will complete the legislative proceedings for Assessment District No. 94-1
(Eastlake Greens II). Through the approval of the proposed resolution the following will
generally be accomplished:
Awarding of the bond sale to the lower bidder, in term of interest cost, at the bid
opening.
Approval of the form of the Third Amendment to the AcquisitionlFinancing Agreement
previously enter into between the City and Eastlake. The proposed amendment will
establish the procedure to ensure compliance with the 2% Maximum Tax. This
amendment is to be approved in substantially final form. The resolution authorizes the
City Manager to approve changes to the Amendment deemed to be in the best interest
of the City.
FISCAL IMPACT: Out of the total confirmed assessment ($7,834,491) in AD 94-1,
$1,096,829 are for bond issuance cost (reserve, underwriter discount, and capitalized interest).
All issuance cost will be paid by the district.
In accordance with Section 15 of the AcquisitionlFinancing agreement for AD 94-1 Eastlake
shall pay to the City an origination charge of 1.5% of the confirmed assessments ($117,517)
or such other percentage as may be established by Council and be in effect at the time of the
public hearing for AD 94-1. On April 25, 1995 and prior to the AD 94-1 hearing, Council
opened a public hearing on the amount of the origination charge (currently I % of the
confirmed assessment) to be collected from developers for the use of public financing. In
response to the request of Eastlake and the Baldwin Company, Council decided to continue the
hearing and postponed the adoption of the revised origination charge to a future date. At the
hearing, Eastlake submitted a letter in which they agree to pay the amount of the origination
charge which Council finally approves. It is anticipated that this issue will be brought to
Council within the next two months. The amount of the origination charge to be paid to the
City at the current I % rate is $78,345 and at the 1.5% proposed for Eastlake in this
Assessment District is $117,517.
WPC M :lhomelengineerlagendalreport4.94\
LDTlA Y -092
dO- J
THIS PAGE BLANK
~tJ -'/
RESOLUTION NO.
J 7<JJ~
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA,
CALIFORNIA, MAKING AWARD FOR SALE OF BONDS AND APPROVING THIRD
AMENDMENT TO ACQUISITION/FINANCING AGREEMENT FOR ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT NO. 94-1 (EASTLAKE GREENS II)
WHEREAS, the CITY COUNCIL of the CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA, has
heretofore instituted and conducted proceedings under the terms and provisions of the "Municipal
Improvement Act of 1913", being Division 12 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of
California, for the installation of certain public works of improvement, together with appurtenances
and appurtenant work, in a special assessment district known and designated as ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT NO. 94-1 (EASTlAKE GREENS II) (hereinafter referred to as the "Assessment
District"); and,
WHEREAS, in the Resolution of Intention it was determined and declared that bonds should
be issued under the provisions of the "Improvement Bond Act of 1915", being Division 10 of the
Streets and Highways Code of the State of California; and, .
WHEREAS, there has now been received, in proper form, a bid (hereinafter the "proposal")
for the purchase of the bonds that is considered to best serve the interests of owners of land
included within the Assessment District and the proposal should be accepted; and,
WHEREAS, there has been presented a Third Amendment to the Acquisition/Financing
Agreement. Document No. , between the City of Chula Vista and Eastlake
Development Company with respect to the public improvements to be funded through the
Assessment District.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOllOWS:
1. That the above recitals are all true and correct.
2. That this legislative body hereby makes an award to and accepts the proposal for the
purchase of the improvement bonds from, the responsible bidder, to-wit:
at the interest rate and terms as set forth in the proposal of said bidder as on file with
the transcript of these proceedings and open for public inspection..
3.
That all other bids received are hereby rejected.
4.
That sale of the bonds is su~ the terms and conditions as set forth in the
Resolution of Issuanc~~e Bond Indenture In its final form, and in the accepted
proposal. .
e2tJ,- f
..
Resolution No.
Page Two
5. The form of the Third Amendment, herewith submitted, Is hereby approved
substantially in the form submitted. The Mayor is hereby authorized to execute the
final form of such amendment on behalf of the City. The City Manager, subject to the
review of the City Attomey and Bond Counsel, is authorized to approve changes in
such amendment deemed to be in the best interests of the City, such changes to be
evidenced by the execution of such amendment. A copy of the final form of such
amendment shall be kept on file in the office of the City Clerk and remain available
for public inspection.
Presented by
as to form by
1
3
John P. Lippitt
Public Works Director
Bruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
-2tJ~t
THIRD AMENDMENT TO ACQUISITION/FINANCING AGREEMENT
THIS THIRD AMENDMENT TO ACQUISITION/FINANCING AGREEMENT (the "Third
Amendment") is made and entered into this day of , 1995
by and between the CITY OF CHULA VISTA, a charter city organized and
validly existing under the Constitution and the laws of the State of
California (the "City") and EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY ("Developer")
to amend that certain Acquisition/Financing Agreement dated as of May
10, 1994 by and between the City and the Developer (the
"Acquisition/Financing Agreement") as previously amended.
WHEREAS, the City has formed of a special assessment district under the
terms and conditions of the 1913 Act for the acquisition of certain
public improvements, together with appurtenances and appurtenant work
within the jurisdictional limits of the City, such special assessment
district known and designated as ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 94-1 (EASTLAKE
GREENS II), and
WHEREAS, the City and the Developer entered into the Agreement to
establish the terms and conditions pursuant to which the City would
acquire the Improvements and issue limited obligation improvement bonds
to finance the acquisition of the Improvements; and
WHEREAS, the City and the Developer now desire to amend the Agreement to
conform to the City's policy limiting the aggregate tax and assessment
burden on residential dwelling units to 2% of the sale price of such
dwelling units.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED between the respective parties as
follows:
SECTION 1.
Recitals. That the above recitals are true and correct.
SECTION 2.
Amendment to Aoreement.
The Agreement is hereby amended to add Section 16A which
shall read as follows:
Limitation of Aooreoate Taxes and Assessments. Developer
shall include in any future agreement to sell all or a~y
portion of the property to any person or entity (a
"Builder") for the purpose of constructing and marketing
owner-occupied residential dwelling units (a
"Builder/Developer Agreement") provisions requiring the
inclusion of the following "escrow demand" in all builder
sales:
1. At or prior to the close of each such escrow, the
Escrow Company shall apply a "calculation formula"
previously approved by the City Engineer of the
City and deposited with the Escrow Company by t~e
Developer to determine the aggregate of all annual
ad valorem property taxes, all Mello-Roos and other
special taxes and all assessment installments (the
"Total Annual Taxes and Assessments") applicable to
the parcel subject to such escrow (the "Applicable
Parcel") .
r:;J.{)-7
SECTION 3.
SECTION 4.
2. I f the Total Annual Taxes and Assessments resulting
from the "calculation formula" exceed 2'0 of the
sales price of the Applicable Parcel, the Escrow
Company will make immediate written demand upon the
Developer for deposit into the escrow of the funds
necessary to prepay the assessments and/or Mello-
Roos or other special taxes so that the Total
Annual Taxes and Assessments will thereafter be
equal to or less than 2'0 of the sale price of the
Applicable Parcel as indicated in the closing
statement. Such funds must be received by the
Escrow Company prior to the close of escrow of the
sale of the Applicable Parcel. Upon closing of
such escrow the amount so deposited by the
Developer pursuant to this escrow demand shall be
sent by the Escrow Company to the Finance Director
of the City or other public agency, as applicable,
together with "written instructions" that such
amount is to be used to partially prepay the
assessment and/or special taxes of the Applicable
Parcel. The Escrow Company shall immediately
notify the amounts of the prepayment and send
copies of all the "written instructions" to the
City Engineer.
Prior to the commencement of builder sales for a
specific subdivision or any portion thereof,
Eastlake shall submit to the City Engineer for
approval the proposed "calculation formula" and
"escrow demand" to be used to determine the Total
Annual Taxes and Assessments for each parcel within
the subdivision or portion thereof. No builder
sales may be commenced unless and until Eastlake
has received written approval of the "calculation
formula" and "escrow demand" from the City
Engineer.
In addition to any other remedy provided for by law
or in equity, the City may enforce the provisions
of this Section 16A by an action for specific
performance or injunctive relief or both.
Other Terms and Conditions of the Aareement. Except as
expressly provided for in this Third Amendment, all other
terms and conditions of the Agreement shall remain in
full force and effect.
Counteroarts. This Third Amendment may be executed in
counterparts, each of which shall be deemed an original.
02tJ~ ~
EXECUTED by and between the parties hereto on the day and year first
hereinabove written.
"CITY"
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
MAYOR
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
~
~
ATTEST:
AS
CITY CLERK
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
BRUCE BOOGAARD,
CITY OF CHULA V
Y ATTORNEY
By:
TITLE:
"DEVELOPER"
EASTLAKE DEVELOPMENT COMPANY
By:
LOT:rb
{M:\HOME\ENGlNEER\LANDDEV\3RDAMEND.LDTl
c2(J- ?
THIS PAGE BLANK
dt7~/1J
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
ITEM TITLE:
Item ..2 I
Meeting Date 6/20/95
Resolution J 7?..3 ') Approving AGREEMENT between City of Chula
Vista and Southwestern Community College District for the operation of the
Chula Vista Border Environmental Technology Resource Center (BETRC)
Chris salomon~, c~mm~ Development Director L_ S ,
City ManageUi ~ttfl\ (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No-X)
U /7 Council Referral No.
SUBMITTED BY:
REVIEWED BY:
BACKGROUND:
On February 15, 1995, the U.S. Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration
(EDA) awarded the City a $2,000,000 grant, matched by a $100,000 Defense Adjustment Matching
grant from the California Trade & Commerce Agency to implement the Border Environmental
Commerce Alliance (BECA). Two key components of this program are the Border Environmental
Technology Resource Center (BETRC) and the Border Environmental Business Cluster (BEBC). EDA
identifies Southwestern College as the "sole source subrecipient of the EDA grant for administering the
BETRC" and requires that the City execute an Agreement with Southwestern, delineating each party's
responsibilities. The proposed Agreement approves Southwestern College as the City's subcontractor
to develop and implement the BETRC program, authorizes a total three year budget of $1,057,221
(including a $15,000 annual fee to Southwestern for administrative services), and requires Southwestern
to be responsible for ensuring compliance with all EDA, Trade & Commerce and other funding source
regulations and requirements. The Agreement includes a required Scope of Work (Exhibit A), Planned
Milestones (Attachment 2 to Exhibit A), the BECA Operational Plan (Attachment 1 to Exhibit A), and
requires a specified reporting process. The Agreement also includes numerous federal regulations, as
provided in Exhibits B through O. (These exhibits are delineated by name on page 14 of the Agreement
and are available for review in the City Clerk's office.) Southwestern is responsible for all BETRC
e;penditures. Reimbursement of expenses will be made to Southwestern by the City subject to
acceptable performance as outlined in the Agreement.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council adopt the resolution approving an Agreement between the City
and Southwestern Community College District for the operation of the Border Environmental
Technology Resource Center (BETRC) in the total amount of $1,057,221 funded by state and federal
grants.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: The City's EDC has identified the BECA
program as one of its priority projects for the past two years. The EDC supported the EDA grant
application (vote 5-0-2, Brene Patrick and Liz Lebron absent; 2 vacancies).
:2/ -- /
Page 2, Item ..< I
Meeting Date 6/20/95
DISCUSSION:
EDA Award and Contract with Citv
The EDA awarded a three-year grant to the City for the BECA program in February, 1995. The City's
existing contract with the federal Economic Development Administration for the overall BECA program
is in the amount of $2,667,218. This includes the EDA grant and the State matching grant, as well as
matching cash and in-kind contributions from the City and Rohr Inc. The EDA contract includes a
budget for the Border Environmental Technology Resource Center (BETRC) of $1,057,221. The
proposed Agreement with Southwestern College is required by the EDA to implement the BECA
program and is consistent with our application as approved by Council on January 10, 1995.
Scooe of Services
The proposed three year Agreement requires Southwestern to carry out the mission of the BECA program
as defined by the City, and specifically to develop and implement the BETRC. The Scope of Work (see
Exhibit A) directly reflects BETRC goals and objectives per the BECA Operational Plan and EDA
application, both of which were approved by the City Council. Services to be provided by Southwestern
are delineated in the Scope of Work, Exhibit A, and are summarized below:
I. Provide a one-stop environmental technology information clearinghouse including a
resource library and electronic databases.
2. Provide direct delivery of in-depth, one-on-one business consulting to BETRC clients
(environmental businesses and businesses seeking environmental management and
regulatory compliance assistance).
3. Provide direct consulting services to the Border Environmental Business Cluster (BEBC)
incubator tenants.
4. Sponsor specialized training activities focusing upon environmental business issues,
environmental management techniques, and environmental regulatory compliance
assistance.
5. Disseminate BETRC information to targeted businesses.
6. Refer BETRC and BEBC clients to other service providers as appropriate.
7. Work to secure funding for and hire an Environmental Regulatory Compliance Specialist.
8. Identify and pursue cross-border opportunities related to environmental pollution
prevention and clean up, and energy conservation, and promote cross-border trade.
9. Implement the BETRC in partnership with the San Diego Regional Economic Conversion
Program/San Diego Technology Council.
10. Coordinate consulting and technical assistance services with other public and private
BECA partners in order to leverage resources and avoid duplication.
II. Assist in developing a BECA Advisory Board and BECA Technical and Financial
Advisory Committees; provide ongoing staff support as requested by BECA Director to
these bodies.
12. Encourage the involvement of the environmental industry in the BETRC program.
.,2) -:<.
Page 3, Item .;l ,
Meeting Date 6/20/95
13. Develop a Strategic Plan for generating program revenues in order to become self-
sufficient, including the establishment of fees for services.
14. Establish a Consultant Pool and related access policies and procedures.
15. Maintain full-time staffing to include the BETRC Manager, Environmental Management
Specialist, Cross-border Environmental Marketing Specialist, Business Development
Specialist, Senior Project Clerk, and Project Clerk; Hire MIS consultant.
16. Develop and implement a comprehensive Marketing/PR Plan.
17. Package microenterprise loans for BEBC clients (contingent upon approval by Council of
loan fund capital).
18. Develop a Strategic Plan to pursue innovative joint ventures with the state and/or federal
government, private organizations and business consortiums, including the creation of
Pilot Demonstration Programs, with an emphasis on cross-border efforts.
Reporting and Performance Benchmarks
Pursuant to the Scope of Work discussed above, Southwestern is required to achieve certain benchmarks
as defined in Attachment 2 of Exhibit A. (An example of a Performance Benchmark is "Prepare and
execute agreements with BECA partners to provide for on-line participation in (environmental) databases"
_ minimum of 3 by 1st Quarter.) Due to the unique nature of BECA and the BETRC, the benchmarks
are provided as targets for Southwestern and as such will be used by the City to monitor and evaluate
their performance. The City will want to demonstrate flexibility in enforcing these as changing
conditions dictate (and as we learn from experience). Years 2 and 3 benchmarks will be submitted by
Southwestern for review and approval by the City as part of the second and third year budget cycle.
Per the Scope of Work (Exhibit A), Southwestern is required to submit quarterly performance and
financial reports discussing program accomplishments and delineating line item expenditures and related
justifications. Instructions are provided regarding how these reports are to be structured and specific
performance areas to be covered (see Attachment 3 to Exhibit A). The performance report is to include
a narrative discussion as well as quantitative measurements where appropriate. Examples of reporting
categories include: client counseling, partnership development, linkages to Mexico, marketing, group
training, innovative projects and joint ventures, assistance to Chula Vista business, and BETRC strategic
planning. Additionally, Southwestern is required to complete specific forms documenting all client
requests for assistance, specific clients counseled and the nature of the consulting, and training forums
held (see Attachments 4, 5, and 6 to Exhibit A). The quantitative data collected via these forms will be
tabulated and presented in the quarterly reports to the City.
BETRC Expenditures/Reimbursement bv Citv
The Agreement stipulates that Southwestern College will be responsible for all expenses related to the
administration of the BETRC. Southwestern is required to submit all outstanding invoices to the City
on a quarterly basis. Subject to review by the BECA Contract Administrator, and ultimately by the
BECA Director, for compliance in terms of state, federal and city regulations (in areas such as budget
authorization, procurement practices, travel practices, consultant insurance and others), and for
satisfactory performance in terms of Scope of Work and Planned Milestones, (see Agreement, Page 4,
.:; /- J
Page 4, Item ..2../
Meeting Date 6/20/95
Section 1.4), the City will reimburse Southwestern for eligible expenses from the General Fund. The
City, in turn, will submit claims and be reimbursed by EDA (on the same quarterly basis).
In the event that the City determines that there has been unsatisfactory performance, the City may
withhold any reimbursements to Southwestern.
Under the terms of the agreement, and per the contract with EDA, Southwestern will be paid up to
$15,000 annually in administration fees for overseeing the BETRC program.
Contract Termination
The City has the right to terminate the Agreement if it is determined that Southwestern is in
noncompliance with Agreement requirements or fails to fulfill its obligations in a timely and proper
manner (see Agreement, page 4, Sec. 1.4.).
Schedule/Implementation
Per the City's existing EDA contract, the BECA program is scheduled to become operational on July
1, 1995. EDA funds will become available to the City at that time. The Agreement with Southwestern
is also proposed to become effective as of July 1. On June 14, 1995, the Southwestern College Board
of Trustees unanimously approved the Agreement with the City.
Since the announcement of the EDA award, staff has been undertaking activities to prepare for the
program's opening date. These are briefly described below:
I. Rohr Facility
Community Development, Building and Housing and Public Works staff have been
working with California Business Incubator Network (CBIN) and Business Cluster
Development (BCD) - with whom the City has an existing contract related to establishing
the BEBC incubator facility - to prepare the donated facility that will house both the
BEBC and the BETRC. The building requires upgrading in the areas of painting; roof,
HV AC and tile repairs; carpeting; fencing; alarm system installation; partition
reconfiguration; etc. This is being funded by Council-approved CDBG funds. Floorplans
have been developed, contractors have been hired and actual improvements are now
underway. All improvements for Phase I of the BEBC (i.e. 10,000 of the total 18,000
square feet) should be completed by July 1, 1995.
2. Staffing
Attachment A to this staff report provides a BECA organization chart. A memo was
submitted to Council on May 8, 1995 outlining the recruitment process for Interim City
Personnel, BETRC (Southwestern College) personnel, and for BEBC (CBIN) personnel
(see Attachment B). Final interviews for the top candidates for the three City personnel
are ongoing with final selection to be made by the City Manager the week of June 19,
;2/- 'I
Page 5, Item .2 ,
Meeting Date 6/20/95
1995. Southwestern and CBIN are currently finalizing their staff selections (subject to
Community Development Department approval). The goal is to have as many of the
positions filled by July I as possible.
3. Related Contracts
As discussed, the proposed Agreement with Southwestern will provide for administration
of the BETRC. In addition, the City has an existing contract with California Business
Incubator Network (CBIN), who in turn has a subcontract with Business Cluster
Development (BCD). CBIN and BCD are required to jointly prepare the BEBC business
plans, raise private funds, and open the BEBC facility. Additionally, CBIN will act as
the Interim non-profit administrator of the BEBC. The CBIN and BCD contracts were
approved prior to the application for and award of EDA funds. As a result, as noted in
a July 19, 1995 staffreport to Council, the previous contract benchmarks have had to be
adjusted. Staff will be bringing Council a separate staffreport amending the Performance
Schedule delineated in the existing CBIN/BCD contract for Council approval. A second
agreement with CBIN may also be brought back to Council for additional BEBC
administrative services that would be subject to all EDA requirements. The structure and
relationship of these agreements is currently under review.
Note that staff will also be bringing back for Council approval an MOU with the City of
San Diego relating to coordination with the San Diego Economic Conversion Program (as
required by EDA).
FISCAL IMPACT: The proposed Agreement is in the amount of $1,057,221. As noted, this amount
covers the 3 year (actually 34 month) period of the EDA award. The $1,057,221 includes the following
breakdown of already approved grant awards:
U.S. Dept. of Commerce, Econ. Dev. Admin. (EDA)
Cal Trade & Commerce Defense Conversion Grant
TOTAL
$957,221
100.000
$1,057,221
The Agreement amount includes an administrative fee to Southwestern of up to $15,000 annually.
There is no cost to the City other than the alreadv approved City cash (CDBG) match for the EDA grant,
CDBG funds for retrofit of the facility, and in-kind staff time. The total approved City funds for the
overall 3 vear BECA program are as follows:
CDBG Cash Match
CDBG Funds for Facility Upgrade
CDBG Funds for Utilities Prior to July 1
$119,977
$ 42,223
$ 2,000
$164,200
[(MD)c:\wp51\document\442.95 (rev. June 14, 1995)]
02)-5'
THIS PAGE BLANK
J./-v
RESOLUTION
/99J?
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA APPROVING AGREEMENT BETWEEN CITY
OF CHULA VISTA AND SOUTHWESTERN COMMUNITY
COLLEGE DISTRICT FOR THE OPERATION OF THE
CHULA VISTA BORDER ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY
RESOURCE CENTER (BETRC)
WHEREAS,effective February 15,1995, the U. S. Department of Commerce, Economic Development
Administration ("EDA") awarded the City a $2,000,000 grant for the Border Environmental Commerce Alliance
("BECA") Project/Award No. 07-49-04062 (the "EDA Grant"); and
WHEREAS, effective February 15, 1995, the California Trade and Commerce Agency ("CTCA")
awarded the City a $100,000 Defense Adjustment Matching Grant for BECA (the "CTCA Grant"); and
WHEREAS, two key components of BECA are the Border Environmental Technology Resource
Center ("BETRC") and the Border Environmental Business Cluster ("BEBC"); and
WHEREAS, the EDA Grant identifies Southwestern as the "sole source" subrecipient of the EDA
Grant for administering the BETRC and requires that City and Southwestern enter into this MOU to delineate
the responsibilities of the parties with respect to the BETRC program; and
WHEREAS, a total of $1,057,221 is budgeted in EDA and CTCA Grant funds, to cover the major
portion of the costs associated with this AGREEMENT; and
WHEREAS, effective May 9, 1995, City subleased from ROHR, INC. ("Rohr") and THE SAN DIEGO
UNIFIED PORT DISTRICT pursuant to that certain Sublease Agreement (the "Rohr Sublease") certain
improved real property in the City of Chula Vista within the Rohr corporate campus commonly referred to as
"Building 52" for purposes of housing the BECA, BETRC, and BEBC programs (the "Program Site:); and
WHEREAS, Southwestern warrants and represents that it is sufficiently experienced and staffed to
deliver the BETRC program services required hereunder in a timely and high quality manner; and
WHEREAS, Southwestern understands that it must comply with all provisions and guidelines, provided
and referenced, necessary to comply with EDA and CTCA Grants, and other funding source requirements
for the BETRC.
NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA does hereby find,
order, determine and resolve to authorize the Mayor to execute the agreement between the City of Chula
Vista and Southwestern College for the operation of the Border Environmental Techn ogy Resource Center.
Ch';'~'S:
o AS TO FO
~
PRESENTED BY:
Community Development Director
Bruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
[(MD)c:\Wp51\documenI\453.95 (rev. June 13, 1995)]
~/- ?
THIS PAGE BLANK
c2/- g/
1\
I ~J
"
\
~
.
.
BECA Functions & Staffing
* ProPOSt1Non.EDA Funding
BEBC Subcontract
CBIN/BCD
Slwed
Setvicesl
Facilities
Businttss
D.Vlllopment
AssistUIC.
lnviron. &so
De". Sp~. ~ ~/t
Cll, Coune"
Cll, M~n~gtr
........
I servil:es I
BETRC Subcontract
SouthwfSttrn Contgt
Enviromnental
Tec1moloey
AssistUIC.
Envuonmantal
Buswss P"m.
AssistUlCt
En". Tech. Czou-Border
Clearinghouse Trade Assis. .
En". Compi.
Specialist
BECA
Advisory
Bo~rd
En".
Mg:rnt.
Tr~
*
Compi.
Assista.nce
Legend
D Funclioll5
o StaffIng
&..~1~~~. State Grant
~~::::~~~ .
;.:>:-: Funding
o Non-EDA
Funded
")::. .
*
,S:)
~
~
~.
It-
'::t>
This page Blank
~<2/-'JtJ
Jnjormalion memorandum
41!a-eh~ 8-
~
May 8, 1995
TO:
The Honorable Mayor and City coun~i1 JJ.
John D. Goss, City Manager-Jc; ~
Chris Salomone, Director of Community Development
~s.
VIA:
FROM:
SUBJECT: Border Environmental Commerce Alliance (BECA) Recruitment Process
I. PURPOSElBACKGROUND
OnJanuary 10, 1995, Council authorized staff to proceed to recruit and hire budgeted staff for the BECA
program. The purpose of this memo is to advise you regarding the ongoing process to recruit and hire
personnel in order to meet our July I, 1995 opening date. BECA personnel will include the following:
I) City Interim Personnel (BECA Director, BECA Contract Administrator, Administrative Assistant); 2)
Southwestern College Personnel for the Environmental Technology Resource Center (BETRC Manager,
Cross-Border Environmental Marketing Specialist, Environmental Management Specialist, Environmental
Business Development Specialist (50%), Senior Project Qerk, Project Clerk); and 3) CBIN Personnel for.
the Incubator (BEBC Manager, Environnv.nt~1 Business Development Specialist (50%), Admini.ttative
AssistaDtlOffice Manager). The job descriptions for each of these positions have been p....--"'<f to
Council.
II. MINIMUM EDA REQUIREMENTS
EDA requires at a minimum:
· Notice! Advertisement in a daily vehicle of regional circulation for at least three days
· Accept applications for at least 10 consecutive days
· Report to EDA outlining the recruitment process including copies of the ads placed
· Report to EDA outlining the top three candidate resumes and the rationale for the
... recommended person for EDA concurrence prior to offering the position
.'
JII. CITY PERSONNEL: RECRUTIMENT AND SELECITON OF THREE ADMINISTRATIVE POSmONS
Job announcements were placed in the San Diego Union Tribune and theLos Angeles 1ime, Orange County
Edition. In addition announcements have been distributed to various sources, including cities, counties,
and state agencies, community-based environmental groups, and environmental businesses. The recruitment
period for City personnel (only) closed on Friday, April 28, 1995.
Applications will be screened by the Personnel Department with the assistance of the Community
Development Department staff and the Environmental Resources Manager. Selected candidates will be
interviewed by a panel of non-City employees. The Director's panel will include representatives of the
San Diego Economic Conversion Program, Southwestern College Small Business Development Center, and
the environmental industry. Following panel interviews, the fInal recommendation will be made by the
Economic Development Manager and the Community Development Director.
~.J/-)/
Border Envirorunental Commerce Alliance (BECA) Recruitment Process
Page 2
May 8, 1995
IV. SOUTHWESTERN COLLEGE PERSONNEL: RECRUITMENT & SELECTION OF BETRC STAFF
Southwestern will establish an interviewing panel for the BETRC professional positions similar in
composition to the panel for the BECA Director plus experts in each position's respective field, and
representation from City's Community Development Department. Final recommendations will be made
to President Joe Conte. The interviewing panel for clerical personnel will include Southwestern College
and Community Development Department representatives. Final recommendations will be made to
President Conte.
V. CBIN PERSONNEL: RECRUITMENT & SELECTION OF BEBC STAFF
CBIN will hire two contract positions, including the BEBC Manager and the Office Manager. Again, a
similar panel will be established for the Manager as for the BECA Director, with the addition of CBIN,
and with the final selection lilade by CBIN, the Community Development Director and Economic
Development Manager. Final selection will be made by CBIN, Community Development Director and
Economic Development Manager. .
Please let us know if you have any questions or comments. Thank you.
[(MD)c:\"P5I~95 (<W. au,. 12, (995))
-
,.
.
~)--J~
AGREEMENT BETWEEN
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
AND
SOUTHWESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT
FOR OPERATION OF THE CHULA VISTA
BORDER ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY RESOURCE CENTER
This AGREEMENT is entered into effective as of July 1,1995, by and between the CITY OF CHULA VISTA,
a chartered municipal corporation ("City") and SOUTHWESTERN COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISTRICT, a
Community College "Southwestern" with reference to the following facts:
Recitals
A. WHEREAS, effective February 15, 1995, the U. S. Department of Commerce, Economic
Development Administration ("EDA") awarded the City a $2,000,000 grant for the Border Environmental
Commerce Alliance ("BECA") Project/Award No. 07-49-04062 (the "EDA Grant");
B. WHEREAS, effective February 15, 1995, the California Trade and Commerce Agency
("CTCA") awarded the City a $100,000 Defense Adjustment Matching Grant for BECA (the "CTCA Grant");
C. WHEREAS, two key components of BECA are the Border Environmental Technology
Resource Center ("BETRC") and the Border Environmental Business Cluster ("BEBC");
D. WHEREAS, the EDA Grant identifies Southwestern as the "sole source" subrecipient of the
EDA Grant for administering the BETRC and requires that City and Southwestern enter into this MOU to
delineate the responsibilities of the parties with respect to the BETRC program;
E. WHEREAS, a total of $1,057,221 is budgeted in EDA and CTCA Grant funds, to cover the
major portion of the costs associated with this AGREEMENT;
F. WHEREAS, effective May 9, 1995, City subleased from ROHR, INC. ("Rohr") and THE SAN
DIEGO UNIFIED PORT DISTRICT pursuant to that certain Sublease Agreement (the "Rohr Sublease")
certain improved real property in the City of Chula Vista within the Rohr corporate campus commonly referred
to as "Building 52" for purposes of housing the BECA, BETRC, and BEBC programs (the "Program Site:);
G. WHEREAS, Southwestern warrants and represents that it is sufficiently experienced and
~affed to deliver the BETRC program services required hereunder in a timely and high quality manner;
H. WHEREAS, Southwestern understands that it must comply with all provisions and guidelines,
provided and referenced, necessary to comply with EDA and CTCA Grants, and other funding source
requirements for the BETRC;
NOW, THEREFORE, in consideration of the above Recitals, the mutual obligations set forth herein,
and other valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which the parties hereby acknowledge, the
City and Southwestern do hereby mutually agree as follows:
1. Southwestern's Duties.
1.1. General Duties.
Except as otherwise provided herein, Southwestern shall be responsible for any and all actions
necessary and appropriate in order to establish and operate BETRC at the Program Site. Such
((MD)c:\wp51\documeot\431.95 (rev. June 14, 1995)]
02j~)')
Page 1
actions shall include, without limitation, furnishing all of the technical, administrative, professional and
other labor, and all supplies, and other materials required and assisting the BECA Director to equip
the facility as needed. Such actions shall be taken in strict accordance with the terms and conditions
of the EDA Grant, any other City-approved funding sources, present or future, and this AGREEMENT.
The SETRC shall be established and operated so as to achieve the following objectives:
(a) Provide a one-stop source of environmental technology information, and technical, export and
business development assistance.
(b) Offer the following services: environmental technology information clearinghouse; technical
assistance; international trade assistance with an emphasis on Mexico; business development
and financial assistance; environmental management training (in pollution prevention and
waste management techniques); and environmental regulatory compliance assistance.
(c) Assist companies addressing environmental problems and opportunities along the United
States - Mexico border and encourage the trade of environmental exports and products
between the United States and Mexico.
(d) Assist emerging environmental technology companies in creating job and entrepreneurial
opportunities for displaced workers.
(e) Assist City staff in the recruitment of environmental companies to Chula Vista and in
encouraging existing businesses and BEBC tenants to expand in Chula Vista.
(f) Develop and begin implementation of a plan to achieve BETRC financial self-sufficiency in
order to ensure ongoing, long-term service delivery.
1.2. Specific Duties and Milestones.
See Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
1.3. Compliance With Fundina Requirements.
Southwestern agrees to be subject to and shall be responsible for compliance with all applicable
Federal, State and local laws and regulations and all terms and conditions of the EDA and CTCA
Grants including, without limitation, the following:
(a) the U.S. Department of Commerce Special Award Conditions of Financial Assistance Award
for Title IX Adjustment Implementation Projects under Section 903 of the Public Works and
Economic Development Act of 1965, as Amended ("EDA Grant", Exhibit S, including Special
Award Conditions attached to the EDA Grant as Attachment 3).
(b) the U.S. Department of Commerce Financial Assistance Standard Terms and Conditions,
including, without limitation, any and all provisions contained therein regarding non-
discrimination, maintenance of a drug-free workplace, lobbying restrictions, and specific
provisions regarding subcontractors and subcontracts (Exhibit C);
(c) Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-87, Cost Principles for State and Local
Governments (Exhibit D);
(d) 15 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 24, Uniform Administrative Requirements for
Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments (Exhibit E);
((MD)c:\wp51\document\431.95 (rev. June 14, 1995))
~/'/'I
Page 2
(e) 15 CFR Part 29a, Audit Requirements for State and Local Governments (Exhibit F);
(f) EDA Nonconstruction Terms and Conditions (Exhibit G);
(g) Executive Order 12549, "Debarment and Suspension" and implementing regulations published
at 15 CFR Part 26, Subparts A through E, "Governmentwide Debarment and Suspension
(Nonprocurement)" (Exhibit H);
(h) Section 319 of Public Law 101-121, which added Section 1352, regarding lObbying
restrictions, to Chapter 13 of Title 31 of the United States Code as implemented at 15 CFR
Part 28, "New Restrictions on Lobbying" (Exhibit I);
(i) Terms and conditions expressed in the CTCA standard agreement C94-0222 (Exhibit J);
U) Local regulations and land use controls;
(k) 15 CFR Part 8 Guidelines for nondiscrimination (see Exhibit K); and
(I) Any and all other laws, rules, regulations, terms and conditions referred to in the above-
described documents, set forth elsewhere in this AGREEMENT, or otherwise applicable
hereto.
Southwestern acknowledges and agrees that in the event that the EDA or the City finds and
determines that Southwestern has failed to comply with the above-described requirements,
reimbursements for costs incurred by Southwestern pursuant to this AGREEMENT or otherwise in
connection with the BETRC may be disallowed; amounts disallowed for reimbursement would then
become the sole cost and responsibility of Southwestern and Southwestern would be subject to the
additional remedies set forth in Section 10 hereof. Southwestern waives any and all claims against
the City and the EDA in the event of such a disallowance.
1.4. Expenditures: Financial ReportinQ and Audit ReQuirements.
(a)
Expenditures. Southwestern shall make expenditures in strict accordance with the EDA
Grant, the approved EDA BETRC Budget and with the BETRC Program Revenue budget,
copies of which are attached hereto as Exhibits Land M, respectively (collectively, the
"Approved Budget"). Southwestern is responsible for planning expenditures and services to
ensure that reimbursement requests for services provided do not exceed the maximum
amounts provided in either the approved EDA budget or the Program Revenue Budgets, as
applicable. Southwestern is responsible for fiscal management of BETRC revenue, but is not
held responsible for program revenue generation in terms of fund raising or meeting projected
program revenue levels. However, Southwestern agrees to assist the City and the BEBC in
their fund raising efforts related to the BETRC, as requested.
-
Notwithstanding the foregoing, a maximum of ten percent (10%) of the approved EDA BETRC
budget ($105,722) and a maximum of ten percent (10%) of each EDA BETRC budget line
item may be reprogrammed without prior written approval of EDA. Any reprogramming of
funds from one line item to another which changes the Scope of Work and/or is in excess of
$2,500, however, shall require prior written approval of the City. Reprogramming of line item
budgets that result in a cumulative reprogramming of BETRC line items of more than 10% of
the total BETRC budget shall require prior written approval of both the City and EDA. For
purposes of this AGREEMENT, BETRC budget line items are identified on page 4 of
Attachment 3 to the EDA contract with the City, Exhibit B of this AGREEMENT.
{(MD)c:\wp51Idocument\431.95 (rev. June 14, 1995)J
Page 3
All accounting systems and procurement practices shall be consistent with federal guidelines
as stated in OMB Circulars A-110 and A-122 (Exhibits Nand 0).
A travel expense policy, a specific budget for out-of-town travel, describing anticipated travel
and conference expenditures, shall be submitted to the City and approved by the City and
EDA, prior to such expenditures. If no such travel policy is approved by the City,
Southwestern must follow the prevailing Federal Travel Regulations, as provided by EDA.
(b) Other Fundino Sources. If Southwestern receives additional funding for the purposes of
funding its duties under this AGREEMENT from a source or sources other than the EDA or
CTCA Grants, the use of which requires that Southwestern make an accounting to or be
subject to an audit by such other source, Southwestern shall charge expenditures to the
appropriate funding source at the time incurred. It is expressly understood by Southwestern
that any cost incurred in connection with the BETRC which is properly chargeable to and
actually claimed for compensation under a funding source other than the EDA or CTCA
Grants shall not be allowed as a chargeable EDA cost under this AGREEMENT.
Southwestern further aCknowledges that if sources of funding other than previously referenced
EDA and CTCA Grants are secured in connection with implementation of the SETRC,
Southwestern will comply with all terms, conditions, and requirements of such funding.
(d)
Federal Participation Disclosure. For any acquisition of goods or services (including
construction services) for the BECA project, in accordance with Section 623 of Public Law
102-141, Southwestern agrees to: (1) Specify in any announcement of the awarding of the
contract for the procurement of the goods and services involved (including construction
services) the amount of Federal funds that will be used to finance the acquisition; and (2)
express the amount announced as a percentage of the total cost of the planned acquisition.
(e)
Audits: Reports. Under the Single Audit Act of 1984 (PL 98-502) pertaining to recipients of
Federal funds, Southwestern must conduct an annual audit in accordance with Federal Office
of Management and Budget (OM B) Circulars A-133 or A-128, and with Department of
Commerce regulations issued pursuant thereto at 15 CFR Part 29a and Part 29b, as
applicable. Southwestern shall provide the City with three copies of the Southwestern College
organization-wide annual audit report within 30 days of it's completion.
-
Southwestern is responsible for, preparing and submitting additional reports to the City in
accordance with EDA standards, the terms of the EDA and CTCA Grants, and the terms of
this AGREEMENT. These reports include those delineated in the Scope of Work, Exhibit A
of this AGREEMENT. All such reports are due to the City 15 days prior to the EDA or other
funding source due date to allow the City sufficient time to review and forward them to EDA.
1.5.
Insurance
Southwestern represents that it and its agents, staff and subconsultants employed by it in connection
with the services required to be rendered, are protected against the risk of loss by the following
insurance coverages, in the following categories, and to the limits specified, policies of which are
issued by Insurance Companies that have a Best's Rating of "A, Class V' or better, or shall meet with
the approval of the City:
(a) Statutory Worker's Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance coverage in
the amount of $1,000,000, where applicable (applies to Consultants with more than one
employee).
4~J-/t
Page 4
((MD)c:\wp51\document\431.95 (rev. June 14, 1995)]
(b) Commercial General liability Insurance including Business Automobile Insurance coverage
in the amount of $1,000,000, combined single limit applied separately to each project away
from premises owned or rented by Southwestern, which names City as an Additional Insured,
and which is primary to any policy which the City may otherwise carry ("Primary Coverage"),
and which treats the employees of the City and Southwestern in the same manner as
members of the general public ("Cross-Iiability Coverage").
1.6. Proof of Insurance Coveraqe.
(a) Certificates of Insurance.
Southwestern shall demonstrate proof of coverage herein required, prior to the
commencement of services by either Southwestern or its subconsultants, by delivery of
Certificates of Insurance demonstrating same to the City, and further indicating that the
policies may not be canceled without at least thirty (30) days written notice to the Additional
Insured.
(b) Policy Endorsements Required.
In order to demonstrate the Additional Insured Coverage, Primary Coverage and Cross-liability
Coverage required under Southwestern's Commercial General liability Insurance Policy,
Southwestern shall deliver a policy endorsement to the City demonstrating same, which shall
be reviewed and approved by the City's Risk Manager.
1.7. Provisions Pertaininq To Acquisition. Maintenance. and Ownership of Furniture & Equipment.
Southwestern is responsible for negligent damage to furniture and equipment purchased with EDA,
CTCA, or other funds for use in connection with the operation of the BETRC. Southwestern is
obligated to keep furniture or equipment in good condition, subject to reasonable wear and tear, and
to make all necessary repairs and adjustments, without qualification, while the furniture or equipment
is in the care, custody and control of Southwestern.
Lost, stolen, or damaged property must be reported to the City within 5 working days of discovery of
such loss or damage. The report shall contain a description of the events leading to the loss or theft,
plans to prevent a reoccurrence and in the case of theft, a copy of the police report.
The City shall retain ownership interest in any furniture and equipment purchased in whole or part
with EDA, CTCA, or other BETRC funds. In the event of termination or expiration of this agreement,
such furniture and equipment shall be delivered to the City, unless:
(a) the agreement is renewed and the City agrees to the continued use of the furniture
and/or equipment by Southwestern;
(b) Southwestern requests and receives approval to reimburse the City for the EDA,
State, or other funds used to purchase the furniture and equipment; or
(c) the City releases ownership interest in the furniture and equipment in accordance with
City policy.
If Southwestern reimburses the City for the funds used to purchase the furniture and equipment, the
amount will be the fair market value as determined by City policies and guidelines.
%c2/-J 7
Page 5
[(MD)c:\wp51\document\431.95 (rev. June 15, 1995)]
2. Duties of the City
2.1.' Contract Administration; Consultation and Cooperation with the City
(a) The City Manager or his designee shall have compliance oversight of Southwestern's
activities as required by this AGREEMENT. As of the date of this AGREEMENT, the City
Manager's designee is Cheryl L. Dye, Economic Development Manager. However, the
Manager may withdraw or change the designation by providing effective notice to
Southwestern, without in any respect affecting the terms of this AGREEMENT. The
designated EDA Grant representative shall have equal monitoring responsibilities of
Southwestern's activities as determined by the EDA monitoring policies and regulations. The
City is responsible for reviewing and approving all reports required under EDA standards, the
terms of the EDA Grant, and the terms of this AGREEMENT.
(b) City shall regularly consult Southwestern for the purpose of reviewing Southwestern's
performance of its obligations hereunder and to provide direction and guidance to achieve the
objectives of this AGREEMENT. The City shall permit access to its office facilities, files and
records by Southwestern throughout the term of the AGREEMENT.
2.2. Reimbursement
(a) City's Role. City shall act as a conduit for the reimbursement to Southwestern of any and all
reimbursement payments due, payable and allowed by the EDA, California Trade and
Commerce Agency, and/or other funding source, as appropriate, and by the City, pursuant
to the terms of the EDA Grant and this AGREEMENT.
(b) Maximum Reimbursement. The maximum reimbursement amount available to Southwestern
under the EDA and CTCA Grants is one million, fifty seven thousand, two hundred and twenty
one dollars ($ 1,057,221.00).
(c) Method of Reimbursement. Southwestern shall be reimbursed by the City for reimbursable
expenditures under the Approved Budget following (1) the determination of satisfactory
performance of the duties under this AGREEMENT related to those expenditures by the EDA
and the City, and (2) City's receipt and approval of an invoice which satisfactorily details such
expenditures. All billings submitted by Southwestern shall contain sufficient information as
to the propriety of the billing to permit the City to evaluate that the amount due and payable
thereunder is proper.
In no event shall Southwestern request reimbursement from the City for obligations entered
into or for costs incurred prior to July 1, 1995. Prior to the first disbursement, Southwestern
shall provide the following documentation to City as applicable: (1) Articles of Incorporation;
(2) By-laws; (3) List of Board of Directors and Addresses; (4) Certificate of Good Standing
from Secretary of State; (5) Federal Combined Certification; and (6) U. S. Department of
Commerce Form CD-346 "Application for Funding Assistance". Thereafter, Southwestern
shall submit a reimbursement invoice in triplicate each quarter, but no more frequently. The
invoice shall include the federal "Request for Advance or Reimbursement" Form 270. The
City shall reimburse Southwestern in a timely manner following the receipt of a properly
documented invoice. All eligible reimbursable expenditures pursuant to the performance of
this AGREEMENT shall conclude as of March 31, 1998 or such earlier date that the EDA
Grant expires, or that the City terminates the AGREEMENT. The invoice containing the final
costs to be reimbursed by the City from EDA funding shall be identified as the "Final EDA
Invoice". The final EDA invoice shall be delivered to the City not more than (30) calendar
((MD)c:\wp51\documeot\431.95 (rev. June 14, 1995)]
/17,1)-/
Page 6
days after the expiration or termination of this agreement (i.e. 30 days after March 31, 1998
or after prior termination by the City).
Twenty five percent (25%) of the maximum reimbursable amount will be withheld to be
disbursed in the following manner: (1) fifteen percent (15%) of the amount shall be disbursed
upon receipt and approval of the draft Final Report and any other outstanding reports by the
City and EDA (the draft Final (Close-Out) Report is due February 28, 1998); (2) ten percent
(10%) of the amount shall be disbursed upon the receipt and approval by the City and EDA
of the Final (Close-Out) Report, and the Final Financial Statement.
Southwestern College shall be entitled to receive a contract administration fee for overseeing
and performing the services required by this AGREEMENT in a manner acceptable to the City
and per the Scope of Work as described in Exhibit A, in a total annual amount not to exceed
$15,000 per year for the life of the agreement. Such compensation shall be reimbursed on
an hourly basis at a rate of $50 per hour, and shall not exceed $1,250.00 per month. This
fee shall compensate Southwestern College for ongoing administration of this and any other
BETRC-related contracts, including, but not limited to, BETRC short- and long-range program
and budgetary planning, policy and procedures development, day-to-day BETRC fiscal and
program/service delivery management, and fiscal and performance monitoring and reporting.
2.3. Access to Proqram Site.
City shall provide Southwestern non-exclusive access to a portion of the Program Site (to be
designated by the City in its sole discretion) at which Southwestern will establish and operate the
BETRC program. Other than the non-exclusive access provided herein, Southwestern shall have no
property or possessory interest in the Program Site. In its use of the Program Site, Southwestern
agrees to comply with the terms and condition of the Rohr Inc. Sublease. Access shall be provided
throughout the term of this AGREEMENT. Upon the expiration or earlier termination of this
AGREEMENT, Southwestern shall promptly remove any and all non-EDA funded personal property
from the Program Site.
3. Administration of Contract.
Each party designates the individuals ("Contract Administrators") indicated, as said party's contract
administrator who is authorized by said party to represent them in the routine administration of this
AGREEMENT.
-
City:
Cheryl L. Dye
Economic Development Manager
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Southwestern:
Mary Wylie, Dean of Economic Development and
Customized Training
Southwestern College
Building 1600
900 Otay Lakes Road
Chula Vista, CA 91910
((MD)c:\wp51\document\431.95 (rev. June 14, 1995)]
fl;i)~)7
Page 7
4. Term; Riqht to Terminate.
4.1. Term.
The term of this AGREEMENT shall commence on July 1, 1995 and shall expire on March 31, 1998
unless (a) otherwise extended by the mutual agreement of the parties hereto; or (b) earlier terminated
as provided herein or otherwise provided by law.
4.2. Termination of AGREEMENT for Cause bv City.
If, through any cause, Southwestern shall fail to fulfill in a timely and proper manner Southwestern's
obligations under this AGREEMENT, or if Southwestern shall violate any of the covenants,
agreements or stipulations of this AGREEMENT, City shall have the right to terminate this
AGREEMENT by giving written notice to Southwestern of such termination and specifying the
effective date thereof at least five (5) days before the effective date of such termination. In that event,
all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, reports and other
materials prepared by Southwestern shall, at the option of the City, become the property of the City,
and Southwestern shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for services provided
to clients and any work satisfactorily completed on such documents and other materials up to the
effective date of Notice of Termination, not to exceed the amounts payable hereunder, and less any
damages caused City by Southwestern's breach.
4.3. Termination of AGREEMENT for Cause bv Southwestern.
If, through any cause, the City fails to fulfill in a timely and proper manner the City's obligations under
this AGREEMENT, or if the City shall violate any of the covenants, agreements or stipulations of this
AGREEMENT, Southwestern shall have the right to terminate this AGREEMENT by giving written
notice to the City of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof. In that event, all
finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, reports and other materials
prepared by Southwestern shall, at the option of the City, become the property of the City, and
Southwestern shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for services provided to
clients and any work satisfactorily completed on such documents and other materials up to the
effective date of Notice of Termination, not to exceed the amounts payable hereunder, and less any
damages caused City by Southwestern's breach.
4.4. Termination of AGREEMENT for Convenience
City may terminate this AGREEMENT at any time and for any reason, by giving specific written notice
to Southwestern of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof, at least thirty (30) days
before the effective date of such termination. In that event, all finished and unfinished documents
and other materials described hereinabove shall, at the option of the City, become City's sole and
exclusive property. If the AGREEMENT is terminated by City as provided in this paragraph,
Southwestern shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for services provided to
clients and satisfactory work completed on such documents or other materials to the effective date
of such termination. Southwestern hereby expressly waives any and all claims for damages or
compensation arising under this AGREEMENT except as set forth herein.
{(MD)c:\wp51\document\431.95 (rev. June 14, 1995))
~ c2/-c2i}
Page 8
5. Financial Interests of Southwestern.
5.1. Decline to Participate.
Southwestern shall not make, or participate in making or in any way attempt to use Southwestern's
position to influence a governmental decision in which Southwestern knows or has reason to know
Southwestern has a financial interest other than the compensation promised by this AGREEMENT.
5.2. Search to Determine Economic Interests.
Southwestern warrants and represents that Southwestern has diligently conducted a search and
inventory of Southwestern's economic interests, as the term is used in the regulations promulgated
by the Fair Political Practices Commission, and has determined that Southwestern does not, to the
best of Southwestern's knowledge, have an economic interest which would conflict with
Southwestern's duties under this AGREEMENT.
5.3. Promise Not to Acquire Conflictinq Interests.
Southwestern further warrants and represents that Southwestern will not acquire, obtain, or assume
an economic interest during the term of this AGREEMENT which would constitute a conflict of interest
as prohibited by the Fair Political Practices Act.
5.4. Dutv to Advise of Conflictinq Interests.
Southwestern further warrants and represents that Southwestern will immediately advise the City
Attorney of City if Southwestern learns of an economic interest of Southwestern's which may result
in a conflict of interest for the purpose of the Fair Political Practices Act, and regulations promulgated
thereunder.
5.5. Specific Warranties Aqainst Economic Interests.
Southwestern warrants and represents that neither Southwestern, nor Southwestern's immediate
family members, nor Southwestern's employees or agents ("Southwestern Associates") presently
have any interest, directly or indirectly, whatsoever in any property which may be the subject matter
of this AGREEMENT Services, or in any property within 2 radial miles from the exterior boundaries
of any property which may be the subject matter of this AGREEMENT, ("Prohibited Interest"), other
than as disclosed to City in writing.
-
Southwestern further warrants and represents that no promise of future employment, remuneration,
consideration, gratuity or other reward or gain has been made to Southwestern or Southwestern
Associates in connection with Southwestern's performance of this AGREEMENT. Southwestern
promises to advise City of any such promise that may be made during the Term of this AGREEMENT,
or for 12 months thereafter.
Southwestern agrees that Southwestern Associates shall not acquire any such Prohibited Interest
within the Term of this AGREEMENT, or for 12 months after the expiration of this AGREEMENT,
except with the written permission of City.
Southwestern may not conduct or solicit any business for any party to this AGREEMENT, or for any
third party which may be in conflict with Southwestern's responsibilities under this AGREEMENT,
except with the written permission of City.
{(MD)c:\wp51\document\431.9S (rev. June 14, 1995))
c2 / -,}... I
Page 9
6. Southwestern to Indemnify City.
Southwestern shall defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, its elected arid appointed
officers and employees, from and against all claims for damages, liability, cost and expense (including without
limitation attorneys' fees) arising out of the conduct of Southwestern, or any agent or employee,
subcontractors, or others in connection with the execution of the work covered by this AGREEMENT
including, without limitation, any and all conduct at or around the Program Site. Southwestern's
indemnification shall include any and all costs, expenses, attorneys' fees and liability incurred by the City,
its officers, agents, or employees in defending against such claims, whether the same proceed to judgment
or not. Further, Southwestern at its own expense shall, upon written request by the City, defend any such
suit or action brought against the City, its officers, agents, or employees. Southwestern's indemnification of
the City shall not be limited by any prior or subsequent declaration by Southwestern.
7. City to Indemnify Southwestern Colleqe.
City shall defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless Southwestern, its elected and appointed
officers and employees, from and against all claims for damages, liability, cost and expense (including without
limitation attorneys' fees) arising out of the conduct of the City, or any agent or employee, subcontractors,
or others in connection with the execution of the work covered by this AGREEMENT including, without
limitation, any and all conduct at or around the Program Site. City's indemnification shall include any and
all costs, expenses, attorneys' fees and liability incurred by Southwestern, its officers, agents, or employees
in defending against such claims, whether the same proceed to judgment or not. Further, City at its own
expense shall, upon written request by Southwestern, defend any such suit or action brought against
Southwestern, its officers, agents, or employees. City's indemnification of Southwestern shall not be limited
by any prior or subsequent declaration by the City.
8. Assiqnability.
The services of Southwestern are personal to the City, and Southwestern shall not assign,
subcontract or delegate any interest or obligation in this AGREEMENT, without prior written consent of City
and the EOA which may be granted or withheld in City's and EONs sole discretion. Any attempt to assign,
subcontract or delegate without such approval shall be null and void.
9. Ownership. Publication. Reproduction and Use of Material.
All reports, studies, information, data, statistics, forms, designs, plans, procedures, systems and any
other materials or properties produced under this AGREEMENT shall be the sole and exclusive property of
<;ity. No such materials or properties produced in whole or in part under this AGREEMENT shall be subject
to private use, copyrights or patent rights by Southwestern in the United States or in any other country
without the express written consent of City. City shall have unrestricted authority to publish, disclose (except
as may be limited by the provisions of the Public Records Act), distribute, and otherwise use, copyright or
patent, in whole or in part, any such reports, studies, data, statistics, forms or other materials or properties
produced under this AGREEMENT.
10. Independent Contractor.
City is interested only in the results obtained and Southwestern shall perform as an independent
contractor with sole control of the manner and means of performing the services required under this
AGREEMENT. City maintains the right only to reject or accept Southwestern's work products. Southwestern
and any of the Southwestern's agents, employees or representatives are, for all purposes under this
AGREEMENT, an independent contractor and shall not be deemed to be an employee of City, and none of
them shall be entitled to any benefits to which City employees are entitled including but not limited to,
overtime, retirement benefits, worker's compensation benefits, injury leave or other leave benefits. Therefore,
((MD)c:\wp51\document\431.95 (rev. June 14, 1995))
.J/-tld.-
Page 10
City will not withhold state or federal income tax, social security tax or any other payroll tax, and
Southwestern shall be solely responsible for the payment of same and shall hold the City harmless with
regard thereto. .
11. Defaults and Remedies.
(a) In General.
In the event Southwestern defaults in its obligations hereunder, City shall be entitled to pursue any
and all remedies provided at law or in equity. Specifically, and without limiting the generality of the
foregoing, Southwestern acknowledges and agrees that the City may, its option, withhold
disbursement of any award funds if such party learns, or has knowledge, that Southwestern has failed
to comply in any manner with any provision of the EDA Grant or this AGREEMENT. Such funds may
be withheld all or in part until the default has been corrected to the City's satisfaction. Southwestern
further agrees to reimburse the City (or the EDA, as appropriate) for any ineligible costs which were
paid from award funds, or if Southwestern fails to reimburse the City, the City shall have the right to
offset the amount of such ineligible costs from any undisbursed funds held by the City.
(b) Meet and Confer.
Upon request by City, Southwestern shall meet and confer in good faith with City for the purpose of
resolving any dispute over the terms of this AGREEMENT.
(c) Administrative Claims Requirements and Procedures.
No suit or arbitration shall be brought arising out of this agreement, against the City unless a claim
has first been presented in writing and filed with the City and acted upon by the City in accordance
with the procedures set forth in Chapter 1.34 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, as same may from
time to time be amended, the provisions of which are incorporated by this reference as if fully set
forth herein, and such policies and procedures used by the City in the implementation of same.
12. Restrictions on Lobbvinq.
Southwestern shall submit prevailing EDA required disclosures and certifications regarding restrictions
on lobbying, currently Form CD-512. Southwestern is subject to Section 319 of Public Law 101-121.
Southwestern is generally prohibited from using Federal funds for lobbying the Executive and Legislative
Branches of the Federal Government in connection with the EDA Grant. Southwestern shall file a
'~ertification Regarding Lobbying" and if applicable a "Disclosure of Lobbying Activities" with fifteen (15) days
following the end of each calendar quarter in which there occurs any event that requires disclosure or that
materially affects the accuracy of the information contained in any disclosure form, previously filed by
Southwestern.
13. Purchase Orders And Subcontractinq Provisions.
Southwestern is encouraged to take advantage of vendor discounts whenever possible and to utilize
the services of small, minority or women-owned businesses and disabled veteran-owned businesses when
subcontracting for goods and services.
Southwestern is entitled to make use of its own staff and such subcontractors as are mutually
acceptable to Southwestern and the City. All agreements between Southwestern and the subcontractor are
subject to approval of the City.
((MD)c:\wp51\docume0t\431.95 (rev. June 14, 1995))
~J/-J-;J
Page 11
Southwestern shall utilize and satisfy the purchasing requirements contained with the Code of Federal
Regulations (CFR) Part 24, subpart C, section 24.36 Procurement, hereto attached as Exhibit E.
14. Minority. Women and Disabled Veteran-Owned Business Enterprise Participation Goals.
As required in all State contracts, by the Public Contract Code Section 100115, participation goals
of 15% of the contract amount subcontracted to Minority Business Enterprises (MBEs) 5% to Women
Business Enterprises (WBEs) 3% to Disabled Veteran Business Enterprises (DVBEs) for services, equipment
or supplies (see Exhibit Pl.
Southwestern shall either:
(a) meet the Minority and Women Business Enterprises (MIWBE) participation goals, and
Disabled Veteran Business Enterprises (DVBE) participation goals, and submit
certification of MIWBEs and DVBEs to the City, or
(b) demonstrate good faith efforts, to the satisfaction of the City and State.
15. Miscellaneous.
15.1 Southwestern Not Authorized to Represent City.
Unless specifically authorized in writing by City, Southwestern shall have no authority to act as City's
agent to bind City to any contractual agreements whatsoever.
15.2. Southwestern is Real Estate Broker and/or Salesman.
Southwestern represents that neither Southwestern, nor their principals are licensed real estate
brokers or salespersons.
15.3. Notices.
All notices, demands or requests provided for or permitted to be given pursuant to this AGREEMENT
must be in writing. All notices, demands and requests to be sent to any party shall be deemed to
have been properly given or served if personally served or deposited in the United States mail,
addressed to such party, postage prepaid, registered or certified, with return receipt requested, at
the addresses identified herein as the places of business for each of the designated parties.
15.4. Entire AGREEMENT.
This AGREEMENT, together with any other written document referred to or contemplated herein,
embody the entire AGREEMENT and understanding between the parties relating to the subject matter
hereof. Neither this AGREEMENT nor any provision hereof may be amended, modified, waived or
discharged except by an instrument in writing executed by the party against which enforcement of
such amendment, waiver or discharge is sought.
15.5. Capacity of Parties.
Each signatory and party hereto hereby warrants and represents to the other party that it has legal
authority and capacity and direction from its principal to enter into this AGREEMENT, and that all
resolutions or other actions have been taken so as to enable it to enter into this AGREEMENT.
((MD)c:\wp51\dOOJment\431.95 (rev. June 14, 1995)J
i ;JJ~.J1/
Page 12
15.6. Governinq LawNenue.
This AGREEMENT shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of
California. Any action arising under or relating to this AGREEMENT shall be brought only in the
federal or state courts located in San Diego County, State of California, and if applicable, the City of
Chula Vista, or as close thereto as possible. Venue for this AGREEMENT, and performance
hereunder, shall be the City of Chula Vista.
15.7 No Third Party Beneficiaries.
There shall be no third party beneficiaries to the terms of this AGREEMENT.
15.8 Subordination to Economic Development Administration
The AGREEMENT shall be and remain subject to terms, covenants, and guidelines of the Economic
Development Administration. In the event of any conflict or inconsistency, the provisions, terms and
conditions required by the Economic Development Administration shall prevail.
[end of page. next page is signature page.]
.
[(MD)c:\wp51Idocument\431.95 (rev. June 14, 1995))
J~ ./
Z I ,2/-;2~
Page 13
Signature Page
to
Agreement between
City of Chula Vista and
Southwestern Community College District
for Operation of the Chula Vista Border
Environmental Technology Resource Center
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Southwestern have executed this AGREEMENTthereby indicating
that they have read and understood same, and indicate their full and complete consent to its terms:
Dated:
,1995
City of Chula Vista
by:
Shirley Horton, Mayor
Attest:
Beverly Authelet, City Clerk
Approved as to form:
Bruce M. Boogaard, City Attorney
,1995
Southwestern Community College District
Dated:
By:
[name of person, title]
By:
[name of person, title]
((MD)c:\wp51\document\431.95 (rev. June 14, 1995)J
~)-;2t/
Page 14
EXHIBITS:
Exhibit A -
Exhibit B -
Exhibit C -
Exhibit D -
Exhibit E -
Exhibit F -
Exhibit G -
Exhibit H -
Exhibit I -
Exhibit J -
Exhibit K -
Exhibit L -
Exhibit M -
Exhibit N -
Exhibit 0 -
Exhibit P -
.
Scope of Work and Milestones
Attachment 1 to Exhibit A - Operational Plan
Attachment 2 to Exhibit A - Performance Standards and Milestones
Attachment 3 to Exhibit A - Instructions for Preparing BETRC Quarterly and
Annual Progress and Financial Reports
Attachment 4 to Exhibit A - BETRC "Request for Counseling" Intake Form
Attachment 5 to Exhibit A - BETRC Counseling Record
Attachment 6 to Exhibit A - BETRC Training Report
EDA Grant (Contract)
U.S. Department of Commerce Financial Assistance Standard Terms and Conditions
Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-8?, Cost Principles for State and
Local Governments
15 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 24, Uniform Administrative Requirements
for Grants and Cooperative Agreements to State and Local Governments
15 CFR Part 29a, Audit Requirements for State and Local Governments
EDA Nonconstruction Terms and Conditions
Executive Order 12549, "Debarment and Suspension" and implementing regulations
published at 15 CFR Part 26, Subparts A through E, "Governmentwide Debarment
and Suspension (Non procurement)"
Section 319 of Public Law 101-121, which added Section 1352, regarding lobbying
restrictions, to Chapter 13 of Title 31 of the United States Code as implemented at
15 CFR Part 28, "New Restrictions on Lobbying"
Terms and conditions expressed in the California Trade and Commerce Agency
standard agreement C94-0222
15 CFR Part 8 Guidelines for nondiscrimination
EDA BETRC Budget
BETRC Program Revenue budget
OMB Circular A-110
OMB Circular A-122
Minority, Women and Disabled Veteran-Owned Business Enterprise Participation
Requirement
[(MD)c:\wp51\document\431.9S (rev. June 14, 1995)1
,:2 ) -,.) 7
Page 15
This page Blank
~/~;Lr-
EXHIBIT A
SCOPE OF WORK
Services to be Performed
Southwestern shall operate the Border Environmental Technology Resource Center (BETRC) (hereinafter
referred to as BETRC) with a principal office located at Building #52 of the Rohr, Inc. campus on Marina
Boulevard in Chula Vista, California 91910.
Southwestern shall provide services to businesses and prospective business owners as provided for in the
EDA grant and in the BECA Operational Plan (see Attachment 1). Southwestern will develop and implement
the BETRC program with the goals of assisting the San Diego region, including the City of Chula Vista, to
diversify its economy, create a sustainable economic base, commercialize defense dependent firms and
technologies, retain existing jobs, create new jobs, optimize cross-border trade relations, and facilitate cross-
border environmental clean-up. The overall Scope of Work for Southwestern shall be the following:
1. Provide a one-stop environmental technology information clearinghouse centralizing access to all
available information pertinent to environmental businesses and to all businesses desiring information
concerning environmental technologies, environmental management, and environmental regulatory
compliance assistance. Examples of information to be made available include federal laboratory
research, information regarding technology transfer, financial resource referrals (ranging from
environmental venture capital firms to government lending and grant programs), government contract
opportunities, market research information (including international trade and specifically information
on the Mexico market), pollution prevention and waste minimization technology information,
matchmaker opportunities, and general community resources.
2. Provide direct delivery of in-depth, high quality, one-on-one, no-cost business consulting to BETRC
clients (I.e. business owners and representatives and prospective business owners) in the areas of
environmental technology, environmental business development (including business management and
planning, financial assistance, international trade, and market development assistance),
environmental management, and environmental regulatory compliance assistance. The purpose of
this assistance is to foster business growth, expansion, innovation, increased productivity, improved
management, defense conversion, and job creation.
3. Provide direct consulting services to the tenants of the BEBC incubator, with a designated minimum
of 50% of the Business Development Specialist's time dedicated to such assistance, and via other
BETRC staff as appropriate.
4. Sponsor and cosponsor specialized training activities and conferences focusing upon environmental
business issues, environmental management techniques, and environmental regulatory compliance
assistance. Provide industry-specific and topic-specific forums. Coordinate with the BEBC and other
BECA partners in designing and organizing these events.
5. Disseminate pertinent information to businesses and business support groups. Such information shall
be made available at the BETRC located in Rohr building #52 and to targeted regional, statewide and
national businesses as part of an overall business outreach program.
6. Refer BETRC and BEBC clients to other service providers, including San Diego Technology Council
partners, and other BECA partners, as appropriate.
[(MD)c:\wp51\document\432.95 (rev. June 14, 1995)]
~//:i7
EXHIBIT A - Page 2
SCOPE OF WORK
7. Provide environmental regulatory compliance assistance via coordination with and/or referral to
existing service providers including the Business Environmental Assistance Center (BEAC).
Additionally, pursue funding and hiring of an on-site Environmental Regulatory Compliance Specialist
to provide compliance assistance, in coordination with and/or modeled after the state Business
Environmental Assistance Center (BEAC) program. (Environmental regulatory compliance assistance
will specifically prohibit enforcement actions.)
8. Identify and pursue U.S./Mexico border-oriented needs and opportunities related to environmental
pollution prevention and clean-up, and energy conservation, and promote trade between U.S.
environmental business and Mexico, targeting these opportunities. Enhance relationships with Mexico
public and private consumers and decision-makers to facilitate increased cross-border trade.
9. Implement the BETRC program as an integral part of the overall BECA program and of the San Diego
Regional Economic Conversion Program/San Diego Regional Technology Council. Provide general
business assistance to Southbay and Chula Vista hightech businesses in cooperation with the San
Diego High Tech Resource Center, and provide specialized assistance to the targeted environmental
industry from throughout Chula Vista and San Diego County per the approved EDA grant and per the
AGREEMENT between the City of Chula Vista and the City of San Diego. At a minimum, cooperative
efforts shall include coordination with the San Diego Regional Technology Alliance, the San Diego
High Technology Center, the San Diego World Trade Center, the San Diego Technology Seed Capital
Fund, the San Diego Technology Incubator, and the City of San Diego Economic Development
Services Department.
10. Coordinate consulting and technical assistance services with other public and private business
support providers in order to leverage resources and avoid duplication. At a minimum, coordinate
with all BECA partners identified in the EDA application and the BECA Operating Plan, including but
not limited to California Trade & Commerce Agency, California Environmental Protection Agency,
California Energy Commission, Southwestern College Small Business DevelopmenUlnternational
Trade Center, U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the California
Business Incubator Network, Business Cluster Development, California Environmental Business
Council, California Environmental Technology Advisory Council, California Environmental Technology
Center, the San Diego County Pollution Prevention Program, UCSD CONNECT, and UCSD and
SDSU environmental technology and international trade programs. Prepare and execute
- AGREEMENTS with each of these partners as appropriate. (Examples of services to be covered in
these agreements include cosponsorship of conferences and seminars, shared databases, shared
publications and research, cosponsorship of trade missions and reverse trade missions, consulting,
management and technical assistance delivery, business education, employee skills training,
matchmaker services, venture capital services, technology transfer/commercialization services.)
11. Utilize volunteers, interns (including Southwestern College and Sweetwater Union High School
District), low cost private consultants and specialized professional resources in delivering BETRC
services. Proactively seek Chula Vista-based resources to meet and fill these roles.
12. Coordinate with the City and with the BEBC in developing a BECA Advisory Board and BECA
Technical and Financial Advisory Committees. Provide membership recommendations and
recommended Board policies and procedures. (The board will include representation from the
environmental industry and related support providers, and will generally follow the membership
guidelines adopted by the Chula Vista Council in the BECA Operating Plan. The final composition
is subject to Chula Vista Council approval.) This Board shall be advisory to the Chula Vista City
Council. It is intended that the board will be involved in reviewing and making recommendations
((MD)c:\wp51\documenl\432.95 (rev. June 14, 1995))
~,-)/'30
EXHIBIT A - Page 3
SCOPE OF WORK
regarding general BECA, BETRC and BEBC policies, and in marketing the services of the BETRC
and the BEBC to the cross-border and statewide business community and to the general public. (At
no time may any Board member receive compensation from government grant funds received for the
BECA program.)
13. In addition to the formal BECA Boards and Committees, involve private sector environmental
businesses, including Chula Vista-based companies, as possible and appropriate, in the development
and implementation of the BETRC program.
14. Develop and implement screening procedures for determining the needs of the individual BETRC
client and for determining the appropriate service provider, including BETRC staff and/or other BECA
partners.
15. Develop recommended guidelines for charging fees for services and a related fee schedule. DevelO'p
a recommended screening mechanism for determining which clients will be required to pay these
fees.
16. Take the leadership role in establishing a Consultant Pool for use by BETRC clients in conjunction
with the BEBC. Identify the types of consultants to be included in this pool as well as the process
for selection of consultants (individuals and/or firms). Establish policy guidelines regarding the use
of outside consultants (the consultant pool) by BETRC clients, including associated fees and
prioritization of access. Execute agreements with the consultants to be included in this pool
stipulating their cost (pro bono, market or below market rate) and availability. (Examples of such
consultants include accountants, engineers, attorneys, customs brokers.) These consultants should
be used only to provide specialized services not available from BETRC staff. Ensure that Chula
Vista-based consultants are sufficiently notified of opportunities for participation in the BETRC
program and consultant pool.
17. Maintain staffing of the BETRC at a minimum of:
(a) One full-time BETRC Manager with qualifications per the City approved job description
(b) One full-time Environmental Management Specialist with qualifications per the City approved
job description with funding to begin January 1, 1996.
(c) One full-time Cross-Border Environmental Marketing Specialist with qualifications per the City
approved job description
(d) One Environmental Business Development Specialist with qualifications per the City approved
job description. This position will be employed by Southwestern but will provide services to
the BEBC on a 50% basis.
(e) One full-time Senior Project Clerk with qualifications per the City approved job description.
(position formerly called Administrative Assistant).
(f) One full-time Project Clerk with qualifications per the City approved jOb description (position
formerly called Clerical Assistant II).
(g) One Management Information Systems consultant with qualifications per the City-approved
job description to provide half-time support as budgeted in year 1, 2 and 3.
All recruitment and selection procedures must be in compliance with EDA requirements. All
professional employee selections must receive advance approvals by the Community Development
Director, Economic Development Manager and EDA.
[(MO)c:\wp51\documeot\432.95 (rev. June 14, 1995)]
%:J//]j
EXHIBIT A - Page 4
SCOPE OF WORK
18. Develop and implement a comprehensive Marketing Plan describing how the SETRC will be promoted
to the following target audiences: 1) the environmental industry, 2) the South bay high tech industry,
and 3) the general business community in terms of environmental management and environmental
regulatory compliance. This plan shall identify specific media, targeted audiences, timeframes, costs,
and source of funds (consistent with the SETRC EDA budget and the SETRC Program Revenue
budget) for each of these three broadly-defined groups. The plan shall be specifically coordinated
with the development of the overall SECA marketing plan, and specifically with the development of
the SESC marketing plan to ensure the optimum use of resources and the maximum coverage. The
plan should be coordinated with SECA partners, including but not limited to the San Diego
Technology Council, San Diego Economic Development Corporation, the South County Economic
Development Council, the San Diego Economic Conversion Council, California Environmental
Protection Agency and the California Trade & Commerce Agency as well as with environmental
industry professional associations. The plan should also be coordinated with the City's Public
Information Office and Community Development Department to ensure leveraging of resources.
All marketing materials shall include the City of Chula Vista Seal and/or "Catch the Spirit" logo, and
the SECA facility Chula Vista address and telephone number. Marketing materials should also
identify Chula Vista as the program sponsor and other SECA partners (co-sponsors) as appropriate.
19. Contingent upon approval by the Chula Vista City Council of funding for a Chula Vista Environmental
Susiness Microenterprise Revolving Loan Fund (initially capitalized by Community Development Slock
Grant monies), provide loan packaging assistance to the SESC tenants. Provide support to SESC
clients as relates to this RLF program via the Susiness Development Specialist and other SETRC
staff as deemed appropriate. Pursue additional public and/or private funding to supplement the
Microenterprise Loan Program. Develop relationships with local lenders to leverage RLF funds. (All
recommended RLF policies and procedures shall be approved by the Chula Vista City Council prior
to expenditure of any RLF funds.)
20. Identify and market all appropriate local, state, and federal financial assistance programs with an
emphasis on programs specializing in environmental technology firms, and assist clients in the
preparation of business plans, grant applications and loan packages. Identify all available venture
capital opportunities and assist both SETRC and SESC clients to obtain venture capital funds.
2.1. Develop a recommended strategic plan to achieve SETRC self-sufficiency within three years of
contract execution, I.e., resulting in a SETRC program that can support itself effective April 1, 1998.
This plan should address measures to "wean" the SETRC from state and federal funding over the
course of Years 1, 2, and 3 per the SECA budget, which relies on generating increasing non-EDA
program revenues during these years. This plan should address issues including but not limited to
the following:
a. Identifying a "long-term" solution to creating a permanent non-profit administering agency to
oversee the SETRC (and/or the SESC) independently of the City. Assisting the City and the
Interim SESC Nonprofit to identify a short-term solution to transferring the SESC oversight
response to a permanent non-profit.
b. Identifying, seeking and obtaining new funding sources, including fundraising, corporate
sponsorships, fees chargeable to SETRC client services, and fees for services to outside
organizations, as well as pursuit of foundation monies and state grants. Federal funds should
also be pursued using non-federally funded staff time.
[(MD)c:\wp51\document\432.95 (rev. June 14, 1995)]
~.2/'-3;L
EXHIBIT A - Page 5
SCOPE OF WORK
c. Evaluating and recommending personnel and/or operational reorganizations, including the
potential for restructuring the BECA program in coordination with the BEBC and/or other
BECA partners.
22. Develop a Strategic Plan to identify opportunities to pursue innovative joint venture projects with the
state and/or federal government, as well as private organizations and business consortiums. Target
and pursue opportunities to establish state and/or federal BECA-related Pilot Programs in Chula Vista
and the Southbay, including the City's proposed BECA Demonstration Zone (providing a model
program for offering financial incentives to environmentally friendly companies utilizing sustainable
technologies).
23. Submit a proposed year 2 and year 3 BETRC budget for City approval. Each proposed bUdget is due
on the 15 of May prior to the beginning of the fiscal year being detailed in the proposed budget.
24. Submit a proposed year 2 and year 3 BETRC Milestones Chart. Each proposed milestones chart is
due on the 15 of May prior to the beginning of the fiscal year being detailed in the proposed
milestones chart.
Scope of Work responsibilities are further defined in Attachment 2 "Planned Milestones".
Under no circumstances will any future BECA funding or restructuring scenarios be acceptable unless
the primary BECA facility (i.e., both the BETRC and BEBC headquarters and primary service delivery
facility) remain in the City of Chula Vista.
Proqram Reportinq Requirements
1.
Southwestern is responsible for submitting reports to the City in accordance with EDA standards, the
terms of the EDA Grant, and the terms of this Agreement. All reports should be prepared using
the U.S. Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration "Guidelines For
Preparing Final Reports" attached and referenced as Attachment 4 of the Special Award
Conditions of Financial Assistance Award for Title IX Adjustment Implementation Projects (see
"Guidelines", Exhibit B).
.
In accordance with the requirements of the Economic Development Administration, Southwestern
shall prepare the following reports:
[(MD)c:\wp51\document\432.95 (rev. June 14, 1995)1
fKe2//])
EXHIBIT A - Page 6
SCOPE OF WORK
DUE DUE TO
REQUIRED REPORTS DESCRIPTION TO CITY EDA
1. WORK SCHEDULE AND A copy of your organizations most recently 8/15/95 9/1/95
STATEMENT OF ACCOUNTING completed organization wide audit.
SYSTEM ADEQUACY
2. QUARTERLY AND ANNUAL Progress Report: A narrative discussion of
PROGRESS AND FINANCIAL program accomplishments made during the
REPORTS quarter.
Financial Report: A line item justification for all
expenditures made during the quarter.
See Exhibit B (Attachment 1) and Exhibit E, 15
CFR Section 24.40. Also see Attachment 3.
YEAR ONE
Quarter 1 (7/1/95 to 9/30/95) 1/15/96 1/31/96
Quarter 2 (10/1/95 to 12/31/95)
Quarter 3 (1/1/96 to 3/31/96) 4/15/96 4/30/96
Quarter 4 (4/1/96 to 6/30/96) 7/15/96 7/31/96
Annual
Proposed Year 2 BETRC Budget 5/15/96 N/A
Proposed Year 2 BETRC 5/15/96 N/A
Milestones
YEAR TWO
Quarter 1 (7/1/96 to 9/30/96) 10/15/96 10/31/96
Quarter 2 (10/1/96 to 12/31/96) 1/15/97 1/31/97
Quarter 3 (1/1/97 to 3/31/97) 4/15/97 4/30/97
Quarter 4 (4/1/97 to 6/30/97) 7/15/97 7/31/97
Annual
Proposed Year 3 BETRC Budget 5/15/97 N/A
Proposed Year 3 BETRC 5/15/97 N/A
Milestones
YEAR THREE
Quarter 1 (7/1/97 to 9/30/97) 10/15/97 10/31/97
Quarter 2 (10/1/97 to 12/31/97) 1/15/98 1/31/98
Quarter 3 (1/1/98 to 3/15/98) 3/15/98 3/31/98
Annual
3. ANNUAL ORGANIZATION-WIDE See Section l.4(e) of this AGREEMENT. Within 15 days of
AUDIT REPORT its completion.
4. DRAFT FINAL (CLOSE-OUT) Discussion of the accomplishments and 2/28/98 N/A
REPORT shortfalls which occurred during the life of the
grant. A line item transaction history, and
discussion of accounts for which a transfer in
or out of that account took place. See Exhibit
B (Attachment 1) and Exhibit E, 15 CFR
Section 24. Also see Attachment 3.
5. FINAL (CLOSE-OUT) REPORT Same as above. 3/22/98 3/31/98
NOTE: The dates listed above supersede those listed in the U.S. Department of Commerce Economic Development Administration
Special Award Conditions of Financial Assistance Award for Title IX Adjustment Implementation Projects under Section 903 of
the Public Works and Economic Development Act of 1965, as amended (see Exhibit B).
[(MD)c:\wp51\document\432.95 (rev. June 15, 1995)J
~/-31
EXHIBIT A - Page 7
SCOPE OF WORK
2. Southwestern agrees to maintain records documenting services performed and cooperative
agreements for periodic monitoring and auditing, including those listed below. Southwestern agrees
to input all counseling and training information in the MIS using the forms below in a timely fashion,
insuring inclusion of the cumulative data in the pertinent quarterly report to the City. The MIS format
must be agreed upon no later than August 1, 1995.
REQUIRED FORMS/REPORTS
(a) Service Reouest Loo
A log shall be maintained which includes the name of the person, name of the business, type
of business, address, phone number and type of service requested for all inquiries, referrals,
and requests for consulting and technical assistance.
(b) "Reouest for Counselino" Intake Form (Attachment 4)
A "BETRC Request For Counseling" form, shall be completed by each individual requesting
BETRC assistance. The form collects data related to the date of request, name of business,
name of persons, address, phone number, business profile, types of services requested by
client, and intake counselor name.
(c) BETRC Counselino Record (Attachment 5)
This form shall be completed by the BETRC counselor providing the consulting service. It
documents information regarding the business, the type of services provided, number of
hours, and recommendations.
(d) BETRC Trainino Report (Attachment 6)
This form documents BETRC training and related marketing information, topics, cosponsors,
speakers, attendees, and attendee demographic data.
OTHER RECORDS ON FILE
-
(e) AGREEMENTS for Cooperative Services
AGREEMENTS, cooperative agreements and participation agreements for each cooperative
service provider.
(f) Advisorv Board and Committee Membership Information
Name, address, telephone number and background for each member on the Advisory Board
or Technical Advisory Committees.
(g) Reouired Reports
All reports that may be requested by the City, EDA, or other funding source, including those
listed above.
((MD)c:\wp51\document\432.95 (rev. June 14, 1995)]
;YTc2/<]~
EXHIBIT A - Page 8
SCOPE OF WORK
(h) Standards of Conduct Aoreements
The BETRC will maintain a file that contains a standards of conduct code or agreement
signed by each employee and volunteer per EDA requirements. The written code or
standards must contain a conflicts of interest policy covering all BETRC employees and
volunteers.
ATTACHMENTS:
1 - BECA Operational Plan
2 - Planned Milestones
3 - Instructions for Preparing BETRC Quarterly and Annual Progress and Financial Reports
4 - BETRC "Request for Counseling" Intake Form
5 - BETRC Counseling Record
6 - BETRC Training Report
-
[(MD)c:\wp51\document\432.95 (rev. June 14, 1995))
~//J~-
AttJzchment 1 to
EXHIBIT A
BORDER ENVIRONMENT AL COMMERCE ALLIANCE
(BECA)
Operational Plan
October 12,1994* .
.Section VI, "BECA BUDGET," revised May, 1995
t-"
i?/1 02/~J7
This page Blank
~)<yr
Table of Contents
I. INTRODUCTION: BECA MISSION AND INITIATIVEq .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . " 1
A. Border Environmental Technology Resource Center (BETRC) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 2
B. Border Environmental Business Cluster (BEBG) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 2
C. Border Environmental Technology Demonstration Area .......................... 2
II. BECA: THE NEED, OPPORTUNITIES, AND BENEFITS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 3
A. Need for the Border Environmental Commerce Alliance ............... . . . . . .. 3
B. Benefits of the BECA ...............................,.................. 4
1. ECONOMIC DIVERSIFICATION/JOB CREATION. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 4
2. DEVELOPMENT OF A SUSTAINABLE ECONOMY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 4
3. U.S.lMEXICO BORDER OPPORTUNITIES ......................... 4
4. CROSS-BORDER ENVIRONMENTAL CLEAN-UP. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 5
5. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT/ENVIRONMENTAL COOPERATION. . . . . . . . . . . .. 5
III. BECA ORGANIZATION ...................................................... 5
A. BECA Alliance Members ......................... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
B. City of Chula Vista - EDA Grant Recipient. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 6
C. BECA Advisory Board . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 6
D. BECA Staffing ....................................................... 8
E. Border Environmental Technology Resource Center (BETRC) Administration ........... 8
F. Border Environmental Business Cluster (BEBC) Administration ..................... 9
IV. BECA SERVICES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 10
A. Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with San Diego Technology Council and Regional
Technology Alliance (RTA) .............................................. 10
B. Border Environmental Technology Resource Center (BETRC) Service Delivery. . . . . . . . .. 11
1. BETRC SERVICE DELIVERY SYSTEMS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 11
2. STAFF SUPPORT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. 14
3. BETRC INTAKE AND REFERRAL SYSTEMS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 16
4. CONSULTANTS/SEMINARS AND WORKSHOPS ......................... 17
C. BEBC Service Delivery Systems .......................................... 18
1. BEBC SUPPORT SERVICES. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 18
2. STAFF SUPPORT. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 19
3. BEBC INTAKE AND REFERRAL SYSTEMS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 20
4. CONSULTANTS/SEMINARS AND WORKSHOPS. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 20
5. ELIGIBILITY: TENANT APPLICATION AND SELECTION PROCESS. . . . . . . . . .. 21
6. TENANT GRADUATION PROCESS .................................. 22
v.. BECA PUBLIC OUTREACH. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 22
A. Outreach Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 22
B. Targeted industry types. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 23
1. BECA MARKET ASSESSMENT ..................................... 23
2. SOUTHWESTERN COLLEGE SURVEY. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 24
3. BETRC CLIENTS ............................................... 24
4. BEBC CLIENTS ................................................ 25
VI. BECA BUDGET . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 25
A. BECA Expenses . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 25
B. BECA Funding Sources. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 26
C. BECA - Goals to Become Self-Supporting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. 26
ATTACHMENT A - Graphic: Relationship of BECA to San Diego Technology Council
ATTACHMENT B - California Environmental Technology Partnership 1994 Strategic Plan
ATTACHMENT C - BECA Functions and Staffing
ATTACHMENT D - BECA Public Outreach Plan
ATTACHMENT E - BECA Market Assessment
ATTACHMENT F - BECA Budget - EDA Grant, Years I, II, III
ATTACHMENT G - BECA Budget - PostEDA Grant, Years IV and V
~/-YI
This pa.ge Bla.nk
~)j-JjcJ
BORDER ENVIRONMENTAL COMMERCE ALLIANCE (BECA)
OPERATIONAL PLAN
I. INTRODUCTION: BECA MISSION AND INITIATIVES
The proposed Border Environmental Commerce Alliance (BECA) is a regional coalition of United
States/Mexico border oriented public and private partners sharing the common goals of assisting
the growing environmental industry and encouraging the development and commercialization of
environmental technologies, thereby generating both economic and environmental benefits for
the international border area. Through coordination and leveraging of resources, the BECA
alliance will enhance the border area's infrastructure for this targeted business cluster, helping
start-up environmental businesses to be successful, existing defense-related business to
transition its products and services to the commercial marketplace, and small and medium-sized
environmental businesses to expand both domestically and internationally. The BECA will also
help businesses across the spectrum to integrate cost effective, environmentally friendly
technologies and practices into their operations, and to understand how to comply with existing
and proposed environmental regulations.
The BECA program includes three initiatives: 1) a Border Environmental Technology
Resource Center (BETRC); 2) a Border Environmental Business Cluster (BEBC) (an
environmental incubator); and 3) a BECA Demonstration Area. These initiatives directly
interface with the existing San Diego Regional Economic Conversion Program, which is funded
by the U.S. Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration (EDA), and is
spearheaded by the San Diego Technology Council. The Technology Council oversees the
following programs: 1) High Technology Resource Center; 2) World Trade Center; 3)
Technology Incubator; and 4) Seed Capital Fund. The application currently being submitted
to EDA by the City of Chura Vista, in conjunction with the City of San Diego, requests
funding for the BECA's Border Environmental Technology Resource Center (BETRC) and
the Border Environmental Business Cluster (BEBC).
The proposed two new initiatives expand the existing San Diego regional economic conversion
program in two fundamental ways - geographically and programmatically. The proposed BETRC
and BEBC incubator will be co-located in a building donated by Rohr Inc. (one of the County's
largest aerospace employers, which has experienced dramatic lay-offs in the past two years)
within the City of Chula Vista, in southern San Diego County - only seven miles from the
U.S.lMexico border. The BETRC will serve a dual economic development role. Firstly, it will act
as a Satellite Center to the San Diego High Tech Resource Center, providing geographically
accessible services to South San Diego County technology-based businesses and to Mexican
business partners. Secondly, the BETRC will provide unique, cutting-edge services to the
targeted, high-growth environmental industry serving clients from throughout San Diego County
and Southern California and linking them to opportunities across the Mexico border.
The relationship of the BECA program and BETRC and BEBC initiatives to the EDA-funded San
Diego Technology Council programs is illustrated in Attachment A.
The functions of the BETRC and BEBC are further delineated below:
[(MD)c:\wp51\document\eda.app (rev. 6/13/95)]
~lJ-I/
Page 1
A. Border Environmental Technology Resource Center (BETRC)
As indicated, the BETRC will serve as a border-oriented, South San Diego County
satellite to the San Diego High Tech Resource Center (HTRC) and the San Diego
Regional Technology Alliance (RTA), providing easy access for southern San Dieoo
businesses and Iinkaaes with Mexican partners. As a satellite center, the BETRe will
directly interface with the HTRC both electronically and through direct networking of
BETRC staff and HTRC staff and partners.
The BETRC will also be designed to become the cross-border, one-stop source for state-
of-the-art environmental technoloov information. technical assistance. export assistance.
and business development assistance. The Center will also offer leading edge pollution
prevention and waste minimization training, and environmental regulatory compliance
services.
B. Border Environmental Business Cluster (BEBC)
The mission of the Border Environmental Business Cluster incubator is to attract and
stimulate the start-up and growth of businesses that provide solutions to environmental
problems. The BEBC will be co-located with the BETRC, leveraging the facility-related
benefits of the incubator with the services of both the BEBC and Environmental
Technology Resource Center staff, as well as consultants, BEBC sponsors, BECA
Alliance partners, and volunteers, including academic, public and private resources. The
BEBC is being designed to serve start up and early stage businesses focusing upon
environmental technologies, approaches to sustainable development and environmental
efficiency. The Cluster will serve as a launching pad for new businesses by providing a
site with inexpensive, shared office space, as well as a variety of business development
services. Twenty-five to thirty environmental businesses will be housed together at the
Chula Vista site where assistance on issues such as technology transfer, marketing and
export assistance will be available. As one of the three statewide environmental business
clusters designated by Cal EPA and the Califomia Environmental Technology Partnership
for support via its statewide strategic plan, BEBC tenants will have easy access to the
other two California environmental clusters in Thousand Oaks and San Jose.
C. Border Environmental Technology Demonstration Area
In keeping with the border orientation, an Environmental Technology Demonstration Area
is proposed for Southern San Diego county, to encompass portions of the unincorporated
San Diego County and of the City of San Diego, as well as the Cities of Chula Vista,
National City and Imperial Beach. The Demonstration Area would be developed as a
Pilot Program offering financial and training-related incentives to businesses achieving
Demonstration Area objectives.
These objectives would focus on encouraging: 1) the development and/or manufacturing
of innovative environmentally beneficial products; 2) the utilization of sustainable process
and pollution prevention/waste minimization technologies; and 3) services intended to
prevent, decrease, control, mitigate, detect or monitor pollution. Demonstration Area
incentives would support business start-up and expansion, technology commercialization
and cost-effective integration of state-of-the-art sustainable technologies into ongoing
business practices. In order to qualify for these incentives, a business applicant would
((MD)c:\wp51\document\eda.app (rev.6J13195))
~/-tJ-2
~
Page 2
need to demonstrate the intent and ability to meet established environmental criteria,
such as utilization of highest level pollution prevention technologies/processes (with a
zero discharge goal), minimal depletion of natural resources used in the business
operation, and maximum levels of emissions). NOTE: The EDA grant does not
request funding for this initiative. -
II. BECA: THE NEED, OPPORTUNITIES, AND BENEFITS
A. Need for the Border Environmental Commerce Alliance
The BECA program is based upon the need for an innovative economic development
approach to address and take advantage of the following emerging set of business
conditions and opportunities:
1. economic adiustments and challenoes, including a national and continuing
California recession; base closures; defense cutbacks and dislocations. The San
Diego area is projected to experience an overall 50% reduction in the aerospace
industry, or some 28,000 jobs.
2. environmental reoulations which are creating new opportunities for the maturing
environmental product and service industry
3. industrial evolution from environmentally damaging technologies to sustainable
technologies; and
4. emeroino international trade oDDortunities resulting from NAFTA, and increased
market demand based upon ease of cross-border access and accelerated
financing by both the U.S and Mexico of border area environmental projects
The proposed BEBC and BETRC programs are designed to address these needs and
opportunities. No focused mechanism currently exists to stimulate environmental
commercialization and business expansion. Resources are fragmented. Although
increasingly, national and state attention is being paid to these needs, very little
collaborative work is being done between governments, companies and
environmentalists. The BECA is just such a collaboration. The creation of the SECA
public/private alliance, a specialized Environmental Technology Resource Center, and an
Environmental Business Cluster incubator program will establish the needed
infrastructure to enhance on-going defense conversion efforts to assist this
targeted technology-based industry which can offer new jobs to displaced workers
and a sustainable industry that will strengthen and diversify the San Diego region's
economic base.
The SETRC will accomplish these goals by providing a centralized source of specialized
environmental technology information and assistance to entrepreneurs from throughout
San Diego County and Southern California. The BEBC incubator program will help to
accomplish these goals by providing tailorized assistance to start-up companies in the
form of reduced overhead and readily accessible services and support systems. Interest
by the investment community in the environmental industry is high and sufficient capital
exists. However, the risk of environmental start-up investments, like others, is also high.
The SESC will provide the infrastructure needed to reduce the risk of targeted
~-f}
Page 3
[(MD)c:\wp51\document\eda.app (rev. 6/13/95)]
environmental start-ups and to encourage investment. Research indicates that the
success rate for start-ups in business cluster incubators increases from the
national average of 20% after 3 years in operation to 80%.
B. Benefits of the BECA
The BECA will provide a broad range of benefits to the community (as well as to the
state), including:
1. ECONOMIC DIVERSIFICATION/JOB CREATION
The state of California has recognized the unparalleled opportunities for economic
growth and job creation by the environmental industry in the California
Environmental Technology Partnership (CETP) "1994 Strategic Plan for Promoting
California's Environmental Technology Industry" (see Attachment B). California's
environmental industry already generates 17% of total U.S. revenues ($22.8
billion) and boasts over 180,000 jobs. Over 50,000 new jobs in this industry are
projected to be created within the state by 1996. Initiatives such as those
proposed can help escalate that number. The San Diego Regional Economic
Adjustment Program, funded by EDA and the Office of Economic
Adjustment, has identified the environmental technology industry as one of
eight industry clusters that should be targeted and nurtured within the San
Diego region as part of the area's defense conversion efforts.
2. DEVELOPMENT OF A SUSTAINABLE ECONOMY
After almost 25 years of state and federal environmental legislation and exacting
environmental standards, industry is starting to answer the call to develop a
sustainable economy worldwide. Spurred on by proactive pollution prevention and
waste minimization programs, many companies, as well as entire industry groups,
are incorporating strategic environmental management practices into their long
term planning and practice. This evolution is spawning an emerging industry of
environmentally sustainable technologies. The BECA will help support such
industries, thereby helping existing businesses to save money in the following
areas:
.
.
disposal costs
pollution control equipment
regulatory compliance
liability costs
.
.
.
3. U.S.lMEXICO BORDER OPPORTUNITIES
The growing trade development efforts between Mexico and the U.S., most
notably seen through the recent passage of NAFTA, represent a potential wealth
of new business opportunities for companies seeking to do business in and with
Mexico. San Diego and Southbay, due to their proximity to the international
border have unique advantages in promoting regional trade efforts with
Mexico. The BECA will leverage this opportunity and facilitate cross/border
networking, partnerships, and trade. It has been estimated by federal
[(MD)c;\wp51\document\eda.app (rev. 6I13195)}
}k5J~;J7
Page 4
government sources that some $8 billion in U.S. and Mexico financing will be
made available for cross-border environmental projects. The BECA will help
business to tap this tremendous market.
4. CROSS-BORDER ENVIRONMENTAL CLEAN-UP
The surge of population and industrialization, including maquiladoras, along the
U.S.lMexico border has been accompanied by some of the most severe
environmental problems anywhere in the world. Border cities lack basic
infrastructure in the areas of air pollution control, water treatment, sewage
treatment and hazardous waste treatment. NAFTA negotiations have resulted in
increased cooperation between Mexico and the U.S. on common environmental
problems and has heightened awareness of border environmental issues. As
indicated above, this has resulted in significant pledges of financing and resulting
opportunities for U.S. businesses. BECA will provide technical assistance to these
businesses to overcome regulatory, social and cultural barriers to trade with
Mexico. The BECA program will therefore support border area clean-up efforts.
5. ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT/ENVIRONMENTAL COOPERATION.
The BECA program is a unique marriage of business and environmental
groups with a shared mission to support businesses that contribute to a
clean and sustainable economy and to encourage the research,
developmentand commercialization of innovative environmental technology.
The proposed BECA initiatives will offer a vehicle for business and environmental
groups to work together to learn how to encourage and assist the development
of companies offering solutions to environmental problems. The BECA provides
a focal point for collaboration between government, universities, environmental
businesses, environmental groups and non-profit organizations interested in
stimulating new environmental start-ups and expansion and for emerging
environmental technologies.
III. BECA ORGANIZATION
A. BECA Alliance Members
The BECA Alliance, as indicated, is a public/private partnership of organizations wishing
to support the growth of the environmental industry. The Alliance includes the County
of San Diego, Cities of San Diego, National City, Chula Vista and Imperial Beach, as well
as the California Trade and Commerce Agency, CalEPA and the California Energy
Commission. It also includes members ofthe San Diego Technology Council, including,
but not limited to UCSD, Supercomputer Center, CACT, the High Technology Resource
Center, and other Technical Council partners.
Significantly, the BECA Alliance will also bring new resources to the existing San
Diego regional economic conversion program to augment Technology Council
partners. These resources will reflect targeted expertise in the environmental
technology field. Among these new partners are the following organizations:
[(MD)c:\wp51\document\eda.app (rev. 6/13/95))
y:Tj)-Jj~
Page 5
. Environmental businesses
. CalEPA
. California Environmental Technology Partnership
California Environmental Technology Center (CETC)
California Environmental Business Council (CEBC)
. Southwestern College Small Business Development and International
Trade Center (Hazardous Material Training Coalition; International
Environmental Business Project)
San Diego County Pollution Prevention Program
. Environmental Health Coalition
. Sierra Club
. California Business Incubator Network (CBIN)
Business Cluster Development (BCD)
. Environmental Technology Export Council (ETEC)
Business Environmental Assistance Center (BEAC)
. California Energy Commission
B. City of Chula Vista - EDA Grant Recipient
The City of Chula Vista will be the recipient of the EDA grant funds and will be
responsible for the administration of the BECA program, specifically the EDA -funded
BETRC and BEBC initiatives.
C. BECA Advisory Board
A BECA Advisory Board will reflect the BECA Alliance and will be formed with
representation from the San Diego Technology Council, regional environmental industries,
BECA business support partners, BEBC sponsors, environmental groups, and the
participating governmental jurisdictions. The proposed BECA Advisory Board
composition is delineated below:
-
((MD)c:\wp51\c1ocument\eda.app (rev. 6/13195))
~/-YI
Page 6
Area of
Representation
Proposed Organizations
Method of
Appointment
# of
Representatives
-
Environmenta/lndustry Private Companies To be determined 7
Business Support Partners San Diego Technology Council
- South Bay Representative'" Appointed by County
Supervisor, District _ 1
- BECA Subcommittee Chair' Appointed by Techn%gy
Council 1
California Environmental Business Council Appointed by CEBC 1
California Environmental Technology Appointed by CETAC 1
Advisory Council (or CALEPA)
Southwestern College' Appointed by 1
Southwestern College
UCSD CONNECT' and/or CETC Appointed by UCSD 1
SDEDC' Appointed by SDEDC 1
South County EDC Appointed by South 1
County EDC
Greater San Diego Chamber of Appointed by San Diego 1
Commerce'" Chamber of Commerce
Chula Vista Chamber of Commerce Appointed by Chula Vista 1
Chamber of Commerce
BEBC Sponsors Rohr, Inc. Appointed by Rohr 1
Port District'" Appointed by Port 1
District
Environmental Groups San Diego County Pollution Appointed by County 1
Prevention Program Pollution Prevention
Program
Community-based Group Appointed by City of 1
Chula Vista
Ex Officio Government County of San Diego County Administrator 1
Partners
City of San Diego City Manager or 1
Designee
City of National City City Manager or 1
Designee
City of Imperial Beach City Manager or 1
Designee
City of Chula Vista City Manager or 1
Designee
TOTAL 26
"'These organizations also represented on the San Diego Technology Council
NOTE: The proposed composition is illustrative of intended BECA Alliance representatives. Specific members are
yet to be detennined.
The role of the BECA Advisory Board will be to provide regionally-based publiC and
private input to the City of Chula Vista as the grant recipient and responsible
administering agency. The BECA Board will ensure that the interests of the
environmental industry are integrated into the overall program development and the
refinement of service delivery systems. It will provide a vehicle for coordination of
resources among BECA partners. The BECA Board will also serve as the formal regional
group to seek additional outside funding and programmatic resources and to support
such efforts made at the staff level. A stated objective of the Board will be to provide
((MD)c:\wp51\document\eda.app (rev. 6/13/95)J
$.J/-Y?
Page 7
input and guidance to the City of Chula Vista regarding the establishment of the
BECA program as a non-profit entity to function independently of the City and the
currently requested EDA funds.
Note that the San Diego Technology Council will form a BECA working committee and
the committee chair will sit on the BECA Advisory Board, along with the Technology
Council's South bay representative. Additionally, several BECA organizations are also
represented on the Technology Council.
Specifically in terms of the Environmental Business Cluster, the Board will provide input
regarding policy development in the following areas:
1. Management of the phvsical facilities - space, equipment and furniture
2. Support services - administrative, business, legal, regulatory, finance
3. Budaets - including new grants, donations, and in-kind services
4. Personnel - recruitment, training and supervision of BEBC employees
5. Business development - programs to assist start-ups with marketing, sales,
automation, etc.
6. Tenant recruitment and selection criteria
D.
BECA Staffing
.
The BECA program and Advisory Board will be staffed by an EDA funded BECA Director.
The Director will be an employee or contractor of the City of Chula Vista's Community
Development Department, the administering department for the EDA grant and the
economic development arm of the city. The BECA Director will be responsible for overall
BECA development, BETRC and BEBC policy and program development and
implementation, coordination of BECA and Technology Council partners, public outreach
and client solicitation, general EDA grant administration, and administration of the City's
contracts with CBIN (the incubator's interim non-profit administering agency) and with
Southwestern College (administrator of the BETRC). The BECA Director will be
supported by an EDA-funded BECA contract manager/accountant who will be responsible
for EDA grant-related monitoring, reporting and auditing requirements, including all
project accounting. Additional in-kind staff support will be provided by the City of Chula
Vista's Economic Development Manager, Environmental Resource Manager, Community
Development Specialist, Public Relations Coordinator, and secretarial support, as well as
"non-budgeted" finance, legal, and personnel support. City management staff of the
participating government jurisdictions will be ex-officio members of the BECA Board, and
will also provide support as appropriate. BECA functions and staffing are further
described in the chart included as Attachment C.
E.
Border Environmental Technology Resource Center (BETRC) Administration
The Border Environmental Technologies Resource Center (BETRC) will be administered
by the Southwest College Small Business Development and International Trade Center
(SBDC/ITC) under contract to the City of Chula Vista. The SBCD/ITC is well equipped to
do this based upon its economic development mission of education and training, and its
existing targeted programs in the areas of environmental technology, small business
development and international trade. As one of 24 Small Business Development
Centers funded by the State of California Trade and Commerce Agency and the
[(MD}c:\wp51\docurTlerlt\eda.app (rev. 6/13/95)]
~/-Lj~
Page 8
u.s. SBA, and one of 9 Centers for International Trade Development funded by the
California Community Colleges Chancellor's Office, the SBDC/ITC has had extensive
administrative experience in providing one-on-one business counseling and technical
assistance to San Diego area companies. As the BECA Advisory Board and the City of
Chula Vista determine the viability of creating an umbrella BECA non-profit, the contract
with Southwestern College SBDC/ITC may ultimately transfer to the new non-profit, or the
non-profit may elect to administer the program directly.
F. Border Environmental Business Cluster (BEBC) Administration
The BEBC incubator program has been developed as a collaboration between the City
of Chula Vista, Business Cluster Development (BCD), Califomia Business Incubator
Network (CBIN), the City of San Diego, the Califomia Environmental Protection Agency
and the California Trade and Commerce Agency. Cal EPA (and the California
Environmental Technology Partnership) has selected the Border Environmental Business
Cluster as one of three state sponsored Environmental Business Clusters
(incubator programs) in the state of California, the others being the San Jose EBC
and the Thousand Oaks EBC. The private firm of Business Cluster Development (BCD)
has been involved in the development of each of these three environmental incubator
programs, in terms of business plan development, financing, siting, sponsorship
development, facility fit-ups, marketing and other related activities.
The BEBC will be modeled upon the Environmental Business Cluster in San Jose,
California. This Cluster is a collaborative effort between the City of San Jose, Joint
Venture: Silicon Valley, and corporate sponsors such as United Defense, Bank of
America, Pacific Gas & Electric, and Arthur Andersen. During the opening ceremonies
for the San Jose EBC, Felicia Marcus, Western Regional Administrator for U.S. EPA
commented that the Cluster model "seizes the environmental paradigm of the
future and will serve as a model and beacon for the rest of the nation."
The EBC being developed in Thousand Oaks, California was developed with assistance
from SRI Intemational (a non-profit institute conducting scientific and technical studies
for government and business throughout the world) and is based upon research done by
SRI which identified the success and synergy generally enjoyed by technology specific
economic clusters.
#
The City of Chula Vista will act as the lead sponsor for the BEBC. Additionally, Rohr
Inc., a Chula Vista-based Fortune 500 aerospace company, will be a key sponsor
providing the necessary facility and donated furniture and equipment Science
Applications Inc. (SAIC), one of the foremost R&D companies in the U.S. (with 1992
revenues in excess of $1.2 billion) and a leading environmental technology
company, has been involved in program development and will be represented on
the overall BECA Advisory Board.
In each of the three state-designated Environmental Business Clusters, a non-profit
agency is being utilized to oversee the program. Initially, the City of Chula Vista will
contract with the existing California Business Incubator Network (CBIN) to serve as the
interim 501 (c)(3) non-profit administering agency. CBIN is the statewide association of
incubator managers, owners and advocates. Its Board of Directors are drawn from
corporations, utilities, banks, economic development agencies and incubator
((MD)c:\wp51\document\eda.app (rev. 6113195)1
:P0 /-1/1
Page 9
professionals. A primary goal of this non-profit is to facilitate the development of locally-
based incubator projects as strategic economic tools. The BEBC will be developed in a
manner consistent with the City of Chula Vista and BECA Alliance goals, with the longer
term view of establishing a permanent non-profit administering agency. Once
established, the project will be positioned to seek long term sources of funding to
supplement tenant rental income, from such sources as the Cal EilVironmental
Technology Partnership, federal agencies and corporate sponsorships. A Memorandum
of Understanding has already been executed between the City of Chula Vista and CBIN
reflecting this approach.
Initially, CBIN will be responsible for oversight of facility operations, general program
management and administration of the non-profit status of the project. Those
responsibilities will include:
1. Propertv manaqement - oversight of initial fit-up and of BEBC staff in their
responsibilities for managing the physical facilities (space, equipment and
furniture).
2. Financial manaaement of BEBC, including issues related to non-profit status.
3. Receipt of and accountinq for fundinq - grants, donations, in-kind services.
4. Personnel manaaement - recruitment, training and supervision of BEBC
employees.
5. BEBC development - subcontracting with and managing Business Cluster
Development (BCD), the independent consultant involved in the creation and
implementation of all three statewide Environmental Business Clusters. BCD will
provide technical assistance related to BEBC program and policy development
and implementation, including as relates to interfacing with the state and the San
Jose and Thousand Oaks programs.
6. Alliance coordination - development and coordination of all pertinent BECA
partners including BETRC staff, San Diego Technology Council resources,
consultants, volunteers and BEBC sponsors, to optimize service delivery to
tenants.
-
IV. SECA SERVICES
A. Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with San Diego Technology Council and
Regional Technology Alliance (RTA)
As discussed, the BECA program will be an extension of the existing regional economic
conversion program as overseen by the San Diego Technology Council. In order to
coordinate and leverage the resources of the EDA-funded Technology Council
programs (High Technology Resource Center, World Trade Center, Technology
Incubator and Seed Capital Fund) and the state-sponsored Regional Technology
Alliance, with those to be offered via the SETRC and SESC, the City of Chula Vista,
as grantee, intends to enter into an Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) with the
City of San Diego. This MOU will spell out the program mechanics, such as how High
((MD)c:\wp51\document\eda.app (rev. 6/13/95))
~~/'~SCJ
Page 10
Technology Resource Center, World Trade Center, and Regional Technology Alliance
staffs and partners will interface with the BETRC and BEBC, how databases and
consultant funding pools will be shared, how cross-referrals will be handled, how outreach
programs will be coordinated and so on.
B. Border Environmental Technology Resource Center (BETRC) Service Delivery
Systems
1. BETRC SERVICE DELIVERY SYSTEMS
The Border Environmental Technology Resource Center (BETRC) is a
cornerstone of the BECA program. As discussed earlier, the BETRC will be a
satellite of the San Diego High Technology Resource Center (HTRC) serving dual
roles: 1) offering convenient access for South San Diego County
technology-based businesses to all the resources of the San Diego
Technology Council; and 2) offering specialized services in the
environmental technologies field. In this dual capacity, the BETRC will be an
integral part of the EDA funded San Diego Economic Conversion program and the
state Regional Technology Alliance program, as well as the California
Environmental Technology Partnership - a marriage of the state's Cal EPA and
Cal Trade and Commerce Agency designed to support the environmental industry.
The BETRC will be a one-stop access point for entrepreneurs from throughout
San Diego County wishing assistance in the development, commercialization,
financing, marketing and export of environmental goods, services, and
technologies, and as related to environmental regulations and environmental
management.
In meeting its mission, the BETRC will offer the following key services: 1)
Environmental Technology Clearinghouse; 2) Technical and Business
Development Assistance; 3) International Trade/Cross-border Market Assistance;
4) Environmental Management Training; and 5) Environmental Regulatory
Compliance Assistance. Each ofthese functions will utilize both BETRC staff
(described in Section B.2., beginning on page 14) as well as the resources
of both the San Diego Technology Council and RTA programs and the new
BECA Alliance members. These services are summarized below.
Environmental Technology Information Clearinghouse:
The BETRC will centralize the enormous wealth of information currently available
but not easily accessible to environmental businesses. Information will be
available in areas ranging from pollution prevention approaches to environmental
laws and regulation, from existing environmental technology research and
commercialization issues to environmental venture capital pools and Mexico
export opportunities. To do this, the BETRC will coordinate with the San Diego
Technology Council's resources, including academic institutions, federal labs,
private industries and consultants, as well as with new BECA partners, including
the Cal EPA Pollution Prevention Clearinghouse, Small Business and Intemational
Trade Center, Business Environmental Assistance Center, and others.
Coordination among partners will include sharing of specialized electronic
[(MD)c:\wp51\document\eda.app (rev.6/13195)}
~/-5/
Page 11
databases. The SETRC will subscribe to specialized technology publications and
acquire a library of commonly referenced materials such as governmental
documents including grant and procurement opportunities, SSIR announcements
etc. The Clearinghouse will also act as a centralized source of informatio~
regarding joint venture opportunities. The SETRC will publish a newsletter,
accessible by computer, to advise business regarding new developments in the
industry and business opportunities.
Environmental Business Technical Assistance:
SETRC staff will provide specialized technical assistance to environmental
businesses. Key SECA partners will include the new California Environmental
Technology Center at Scripps Institution of Oceanography, the Small Susiness
Development/International Trade Center, the Center for Applied Competitive
Technologies, federal lab related resources, and environmental consultants.
Examples of the types of assistance to be provided are listed below.
. Environmental products and services market research and analysis
. Commercial business planning and management techniques for
environmental companies .
. Matching of environmental technology with manufacturing production
resources
. Matchmaker services to identify joint venture or investment opportunities,
including fostering consortia-developed environmental technologies
. Assistance with state and federal contract/procurement/grant opportunities
. Research regarding speCific source reduction, pOllution prevention and
waste management technologies needed
. Analysis of production processes and application of environmental
technology/assistance in upgraded manufacturing applications
It should be noted that once the SECA Demonstration Area is funded (funding for
this initiative is not requested in the EDA application), SETRC staff will also be
responsible for screening applications for financial assistance and for providing
assistance to the company to meet Demonstration Area eligibility criteria.
Environmental Business International Trade/Mexico Market Assistance:
.
SETRC staff will offer expertise in the area of international trade related to
environmental technologies, goods and services, with an emphasis in Mexico
market opportunities. SETRC staff will link environmental companies with both
public and private consumers on both sides of the border, and sponsor and co-
sponsor specialized trade forums and trade and reverse trade missions,
workshops and seminars. It is important to note that the EDA-funded World
Trade Center (WTC) staff does not include a Mexico Trade specialist. The WTC
will act as a general international trade clearinghouse/referral center, offering a
general database regarding international trade markets, seminars on such topics
as "Fundamentals of Exporting", a language school, and other general support
services. The WTC will not be able to offer the concentrated services needed to
link environmental entrepreneurs with Mexican trade opportunities. In terms of
the State's CalEPA and Trade and Commerce Agency (CTCA) trade-related
[(MD)c:\wp51\document\eda.app (rev. 6/13/95)]
M; //('~
Page 12
activities, BECA has arranged for cooperative efforts which will leverage existing
resources and benefit from BECA's unique border-oriented location. For example,
CTCA will provide support for NAFTA-related training and seminars for BECA
environmental companies, facilitate BECA client's export financing and trade leads
and connect clients with its Mexico office. CalEPA will coordinate with BECA in
sponsoring site visits of BECA clients for representatives from Mexican companies
and government agencies and co-sponsor in-bound missions to promote
utilization of California environmental technologies. CalEPA will also collaborate
with BECA to assess environmental technology needs and develop strategies to
help cross-border business integrate environmental management practices
thereby generating market demand for BECA clients' products/services. The
California Energy Commission will also co-sponsor with BECA in-bound site
visits/trade missions to promote utilization of California energy technologies in
Mexico.
BECA will leverage the work done by Southwestern College in developing
cooperative agreements with such agencies as SEDESOL (Mexico's EPA
counterpart), COBAYCT (the Science and Technology Council of the Ministry of
Economic Development for the State of Baja California), and the Western
Maquiladora Trade Association, as well as the SBDC/IT's market research
regarding Mexico's need for environmental products and services, to provide
targeted Mexico trade assistance to BECA clients. (Note that Southwestern
College's International Environmental Business Project is a one-time grant-funded
activity; BECA and the SBDC/IC intend to collaborate and leverage future
resources and opportunities via BECA's non-profit organization.)
Environmental Management Training:
BETRC staff will promote the use by industry of environmentally friendly
processes and products in order to reduce their escalating costs in the areas of
regulatory compliance and environmental liability. Training and one-on-one
counseling will be provided in the following areas:
. Hazardous waste disposal techniques
Pollution prevention methods and control equipment
. Liability related to improper disposal of wastes, worker injury, accidental
release of toxins, product liability, and community exposure
. Utilization of environmentally sound processes which eliminate the need
for expensive equipment
. Long term waste reduction strategies to reduce both operating costs and
regulatory fees and fines
Partners of note include San Diego County Pollution Prevention Training Program,
CalEPA Pollution Prevention Training Program, the California Environmental
Hazardous Materials Technology Consortium, and the Business Environmental
Assistance Center (BEAC).
~-f)
Page 13
[(MD)C:\wp51\document\eda.app (rev. 6/13/95)]
Environmental Regulatory Compliance Assistance:
The BETRC proposes to provide border-oriented satellite services to the existing
Business Environmental Assistance Center (BEAC) in Orange County at UC
Fullerton. BEAC is a cooperative program of the Cal Trade and Commerce
Agency, California Air Resources Board, California Community Colleges, and the
Southcoast Air Quality Management District. BEAC provides environmental
compliance and technical assistance for California businesses through one-on-one
counseling and seminars. As an extension of BEAC, BETRC will also provide
counseling and seminars, visit business to help identify measures needed, assist
in locating financial assistance for pollution prevention equipment, make
consulting referrals, research latest advances in technology and provide up-to-
date federal, state and regional information regarding air quality, water quality,
hazardous materials handling, storage and disposal, recycling and waste
minimization, as well as environmental health issues. BETRC's regulatory
compliance assistance will facilitate cross-border linkages between industry and
environmental product and service providers.
Environmental Business Financial Assistance:
BETRC staff will inventory all existing financial assistance programs - public and
private - that are of particular relevancy to start-up and expanding environmental
businesses. Staff will stay abreast of changing legislation, policies, grant and loan
program guidelines and application procedures, and network with related contacts.
BETRC clients will be linked to these programs and provided assistance in
meeting respective eligibility criteria and in making application. Key BECA and
Technology Council partners involved in this effort will include the San Diego
Certified Development Corporation (CDC), venture capitalists (and related
consulting firms), local lenders, California Trade and Commerce and UCSD
CONNECT.
2. STAFF SUPPORT
The services described above will be provided by a BETRC staff composed of the
following professionals:
~
I POSITION I STAFF I
LEVEL
BETRC Manager 1
Environmental Business Development Specialist .5
Environmental Business Cross-Border Trade Specialist 1
Environmental Management Specialist 1
Environmental Regulatory Compliance Specialist (Proposed) 1
TOTAL 4.5
This professional staff will be supported by one (1) Administrative Assistant and
one (1) clerical assistant for a total BETRC staff of 6.5 positions. The
[(MD)C:\wp51\document\eda.app (rev. 6/13/95)]
~/~5';/
Page 14
Environmental Business Specialist will work part-time (50%) for BETRC clients
and part-time (50%) for BEBC tenants.) BETRC staff will create "teams" of
experts to assist clients on an as-needed basis, using Technology Council and
BECA resources.
Note that not all staffing is proposed to be EDA-funded. See Section VI
"Budget".
The general job description of each BETRC staff member is summarized below.
BETRC MANAGER: The BETRC Manager will be responsible for developing and
managing the overall BETRC program. The BETRC Manger will coordinate with
all BECA partners to optimize linkages and facilitate the most effective and
efficient client service delivery systems. The Manager will be responsible for the
Center's policy and program development, including development of client
screening policies and procedures; fiscal administration, including EDA grant
accounting, program budgeting, fund-raising and grant solicitation, and
development of a fee for services system; personnel management, including
supervision of all BETRC staff, consultant selection and utilization, and BETRC
marketing/client solicitation. The Manager will be responsible for overseeing the
development and implementation of individual client service plans, and will also
be responsible for establishing BETRC procedures as relates to support for the
BEBC tenants. The BETRC Manager will report to the BECA Director.
-
ENVIRONMENTAL BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST: The
Environmental Business Development Specialist will consult with BETRC clients
as referred by the High Technology Resource Center, or other BECA partners, or
as respond to BECA outreach/solicitation. The Specialist will define the client's
needs, assist with business assessments and offer business operations advice.
He/she will assist environmental companies to develop business plans, operating
plans, marketing plans, financing plans and associated strategies and procedures.
The Environmental Business Development Specialist will be responsible for
networking with all Technology Council partners to ensure that the company's
needs have been addressed by the HTRC system as appropriate. However,
he/she will also be responsible for identifying and accessing all resources
uniquely appropriate for assisting the special needs of an environmental business.
The Specialist will focus on environmental technologies and related technical
trends and issues, environmental goods/services markets and commercialization
opportunities, existing environmental businesses and joint venture opportunities;
environmental financing, including specialized venture capital pools and NAFTA-
related funding; ongoing government sponsored environmental initiatives;
environmental consultants as client resources; etc. This Specialist will also
provide on-site one-on-one counseling for the environmental incubator tenants.
ENVIRONMENTAL BUSINESS CROSS-BORDER TRADE SPECIALIST: This
position will be responsible for providing international trade counseling to BETRC
clients. The Trade Specialist will have experience and expertise related to both
environmental business and technologies and international trade, with an
emphasis in the Mexico market, including NAFTA-related opportunities. The
Cross-Border Trade Specialist will identify the client's needs and business goals,
((MD)c:\wp51\document\eda.app (rev. 6113/95))
70);(
Page 15
provide all initial counseling, and will identify the need for more in-depth, on-going
counseling (and related consultant referrals). He/she will also coordinate with
Technology Council and BECA partners (as discussed on page 12), and will
recruit part-time International Trade/Environmental Technology consultants. This
specialist will be responsible for coordinating all pertinent trade-related electronic
databases and resource materials.
NOTE: 85% of this position's cost (salary and fringes) will be funded by the
California Defense Adjustment Matching Grant.
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SPECIALIST: The Environmental
Management Specialist will offer general assistance and training in pollution
prevention and waste minimization, coordinating with the partners earlier
referenced on page 13. This position's goal is to assist business to integrate
environmentally sound practices in order to achieve cost savings and efficiencies,
and to enhance the company's competitiveness, as well as to realize
environmental benefits.
NOTE: 77% of this position's cost (salary and fringes) will be funded by the
California Defense Adjustment Matching Grant.
ENVIRONMENTAL REGULATORY COMPLIANCE SPECIALIST (PROPOSED):
The Regulatory Compliance Specialist will provide confidential and non-regulatory
answers to companies' environmental compliance questions, financial assistance
counseling for environmental projects, access to state and federal regulatory
databases, and technical assistance and access to an Electronic Bulletin Board.
This person will offer on-site visits to help identify what measures are needed to
come into environmental compliance and will provide access to consultants as
appropriate. Key partners will include California Trade and Commerce Agency,
including the Business Environmental Assistance Center (BEAC), CaIEPA, BECA
government members' respective Planning Departments, the San Diego One Stop
Permit Center, the San Diego "One Stop Early Assistance Program" through
SDEDC, and local, regional and state regulatory agencies, as well as pertinent
financing sources.
-
NOTE: This position is not currently funded. Funding is proposed to be provided
from a partnership of state and local agencies.
3.
BETRC INTAKE AND REFERRAL SYSTEMS
At this point, it should be very clear that the BETRC will be directly linked to the
San Diego Technology Council partners and programs. As a satellite center to
the San Diego High Tech Resource Center, the BETRC will provide intake for
Southern San Diego County referrals for general technology-based business
assistance, as well as respond to "off the street" inquiries resulting from BETRC
outreach in the South Bay area. The BETRC will offer direct services to these
"high tech" companies utilizing in-house staff, and drawing upon the HTRC and
its affiliates as appropriate. The location of a satellite HTRC in the South bay
will emphasize to local business the true regional nature of the overall EDA-
((MD)c:\wp51\document\eda.app (rev. 6/13/95)]
~~fj,
Page 16
funded economic conversion program - and the accessibility of non-local
resources.
As a specialized environmental technology resource center, BETRC will offer
targeted services to environmental companies referred by the Technology Council
partners, SECA Alliance members and from throughout the County. In terms of
intake and referrals, the San Diego EDC, South San Diego County EDC, and
South bay Chambers of Commerce, as well as the High Tech Resource
Center will be trained to refer appropriate environmental entrepreneurs to
the SETRC (see Attachment AI.
4. CONSULTANTS/SEMINARS AND WORKSHOPS
A consultants pool will be created to augment the San Diego consultant pool to
offer specialized environmental technology-related services. Consultants will
provide one-on-one counseling of a more in-depth or specialized nature than can
be handled by SETRC staff. It is anticipated that this pool will be called upon to
provide consulting in the areas of regulatory compliance, environmental
engineering and technology transfer, sourcing of capital, business planning,
international trade, and procurement. Approximately 10-11 clients per month will
be served by these outside experts.
The SETRC also plans to offer quarterly workshops, open to the public, on
targeted environmental business development topics that have been identified to
be in particular demand. Additionally, the SETRC will cosponsor quarterly
workshops with CAL EPA on topics related to pollution prevention and waste
minimization.
Soth CalEPA and the California Energy Commission intend to co-sponsor with the
SETRC trade and reverse trade missions, site visits and tours related to the
environmental industry. Specifically, Cal EPA will design and sponsor tours of
California environmental companies and technology manufacturing facilities for
representatives of Mexican companies and government agencies. It will also
organize and conduct, in partnership with the SETRC and client companies, one
annual trade and one annual in-bound mission to promote the utilization of
California environmental technologies by the Mexican government and Mexican
businesses.
The California Energy Commission (CEC) will cosponsor with the SETRC a series
of workshops for Mexican government representatives and California ahd Mexican
private companies related to energy efficiency and conservation" and alternative
technologies and fuels to meet commercial, agricultural and residential needs and
to reduce pollution. The CEC will also co-sponsor with the SETRC an annual
trade and an annual in-bound mission to promote the utilization of California
energy technologies in Mexico.
((MD)c:\wp51\document\eda.app (rev. 6/13195)]
~l- 5/
Page 17
C. BEBC Service Delivery Systems
1. BEBC SUPPORT SERVICES
The BEBC's mission will be to help tenant environmental companies identify their
service needs at each stage of their development. The delivery of business and
training support services to these clients will be provided by BEBC staff in
conjunction with teams of advisors from the BETRC, BECA Alliance partners _
including San Diego Technology Council affiliates - and volunteers and
consultants. These BEBC services can be grouped into two categories, as
follows:
a. Basic Services
Entrance: A trained BEBC staff member, working with supporting advisors
pulled from the BECA Alliance, will review applications in terms of viability
of the business concept and the marketability of the company's product or
services, and will determine if clear and measurable goals are identified.
The status of the company's Business Plan will be evaluated and
assistance will be provided to achieve a comprehensive acceptable
Business Plan. The entry process will conclude with a Memorandum of
Understanding (MOU) between the client and the BEBC that itemizes the
necessary next steps and assigns accountability of results.
Move-in: After the selection process is complete, the new client will move
into the BEBC facility located adjacent to the existing Rohr Inc. campus off
of Interstate 5. The BEBC facility will offer convenient access to
transportation routes, including trolley station access - as well as proximity
to the U.S.lMexico border, only seven miles away. Other benefits that will
be offered include the availability of short-term and cost-effective lease
arrangements, and the flexibility of tenant space to accommodate future
growth. The tenant will also immediately experience the typical perks of
a large company, including conference and meeting rooms, shared
receptionist, shared services such as commercial copier, fax, computers,
and communications center, plus a well trained BEBC staff. All of these
benefits will be made available at an affordable cost.
Business support counselina and trainina
The BEBG staff, with assistance from outside consultants, will provide one-
on-one counseling to tenants in the areas of basic management functions,
such as planning, marketing and financial management. Technical
assistance will also be provided in the area of environmental technologies
and environmental practices. Tenants will be introduced to joint venture,
mentoring, and national and international market place opportunities
relating to the environmental industry at this stage. The basic package of
services will be designed to deliver all support that is needed to assist the
client to successfully set up his or her business. BEBC staff and their team
of advisors will also offer on- and off-site technical assistance tailorized to
[(MD)c:\wp51\document\eda.app (rev. 6/13195))
~)~56
Page 18
the client's "evolution of need" to accommodate the sustainable growth of
the company.
b. Advanced Development Services
It is anticipated that a third to a half of the client companies of the BEBC
will be ready to utilize advanced services early in their first year tenancy.
These tenants will require focused assistance in the area of market
development. The SESC will provide this assistance and emphasize the
development of distribution channels as an underlying strategy for
achieving market expansion for Califomia's emerging environmental
products and services.
The SESC will utilize the resources of the San Diego World Trade Center,
the Califomia Trade and Commerce Agency's Office of International Trade
and Investment and Gal EPA's environmental technologies import/export
programs, as well as those of the International Trade Center to facilitate
introduction to international resources and markets. The BEBG will
specialize in networking with the Mexico market - both public and private.
The SESC will utilize members of the BECA Alliance to augment its
systems for sales support, fundinglfinancing and technology
transfer/application. Multi-disciplinary teams will be created comprised of
Alliance members such as UCSD Connect, the California Environmental
Technology Center, San Diego State, the Center for Applied Competitive
Technologies, the Supercomputer, and federal labs and the SBD/ITC. And
of course, the staff of the co-located BETRG will be a primary source of
support.
c.
Advanced Growth Services
-
The SESC's MOU with the client - which guides the client's development
and implementation of his Business Plan - will be a constant in the
SESC/tenant relationship.Another unique service of the SESC will be
assistance with the development of partnerships and joint ventures,
creating new spin-offs and ownership in coordination with the company's
maturation process.
2. STAFF SUPPORT
A BEBe Manager and Administrative Assistant/Receptionist will be hired upon
receipt of EDA funding. They will be trained by CSIN and will assist in the fit-up
as well as the later stages of development. An Environmental Business
Development Specialist will be available to assist clients on a 50% basis (with
50% of his/her time assisting SETRC clients).
The SESG Manager will be responsible for overall operations of the Cluster,
including program and policy development facility management; coordination with
service provider partners; fiscal administration, including EDAgrant administration;
budgeting, purchasing and development of fee for services systems; solicitation
[(MD)c:\wp51\document\eda.app (rev. 6/13/95)]
y;rj/~5/
Page 19
of corporate sponsorships; BEBC marketing and tenant solicitation, screening and
selection; and oversight of BEBC staff and consultants. The Administrative
Assistant/Receptionist will operate the reception desk, act as office manager, and
maintain the business accounts. The part-time Environmental Business
Development Specialist will be responsible for providing one-on-one counseling
to tenants, organizing seminars and workshops, coordinating consultants and
interfacing with other Alliance partners to deliver a comprehensive assistance
package for each tenant.
Detailed job descriptions will be prepared prior to hiring the staff. Business
Cluster Development and California Business Incubator Network will be
responsible for interviewing, hiring and training these staff positions. The BECA
Advisory Board will be solicited for candidates and may participate in the review
of candidate qualifications and interviews.
3. BEBC INTAKE AND REFERRAL SYSTEMS
The BEBC, like the BETRC, will receive referrals from Technology Council
partners including the High Tech Resource Center and San Diego Economic
Development Corporation, as well as from South bay economic development
partners such as the South San Diego County Economic Development Council
and South bay Chambers of Commerce. Cross referrals will occur between the
BEBC and the San Diego Technology Incubator at the Center For Applied
Competitive Technologies, based upon the individual company's qualification as
an environmental industry and/or their particular space needs. (The CACT will
provide industrial space; the BEBC will provide office and shipping and receiving
space.) And of course, the BETRC will make referrals to the BEBC of appropriate
start-up clients.
4. CONSULTANTS/SEMINARS AND WORKSHOPS
A consultants pool will be created of experts in the areas of general business
development, financial, technical and export assistance as well as specialized
environmental technologies related assistance. This will allow for an estimated
300 hours of technical counseling.
.
Additionally, the BEBC will offer routinely scheduled group training via workshops
and seminars. Customized programs will be developed to meet the needs of the
targeted environmental industry entrepreneurs. Among topics to be covered are
the following:
. Quality Control
Entrepreneurism:
- Managing and owning a successful business
- The environmental industry - unique challenges and
opportunities
. Strategic partnering and technology commercialization
. Linking displaced workers with early stage companies
. Applications of emerging environmental technology that will
achieve sustainable development and environmental efficiency
[(MD)c:\wp51\document\eda.app (rev. 6/13/95)]
~ <~)/j,~
Page 20
.
Global marketing
The, Mexico market for environmental goods and services
Sources of consulting and training expertise will include UCSD, San Diego State,
the Community Colleges, and the business community, with special emphasis on
local environmental businesses.
5. ELIGIBILITY: TENANT APPLICATION AND SELECTION PROCESS
The BEBC should accommodate approximately 25-30 environmental start-ups
(with an additional 20 to 30 companies in the BEBC outreach program). There
will be an attempt to attract a diverse range of environmental companies in order
to increase synergy and diminish direct market competition. Businesses will enter
the Cluster on a month-to-month lease. It is anticipated that some start-ups will
have venture or private financial backing while others will not. Some of the start-
ups will have been operational for a short period of time, while others will just be
creating their business. Some start-ups should have 5-6 employees, while others
will start with 1-2 principals. This diversity should insure that the Cluster will have
successful graduates in both the short and long term.
As discussed previously, candidate tenants will need to submit a Business Plan
with their application; BEBC staff will be prepared to assist applicants in the
preparation of their plan as appropriate. The BEBC Director, assisted by the
Advisory Board will review the plan. Each company will be asked to provide
sufficient information to enable the Manager to reasonably ascertain that they
have the ability to pay rent and other fees during the first 4-6 months of operation
at the Cluster even if their business plan revenue projections do not meet
expectations. The cluster will focus on helping start-ups commercialize
technology or bring services to market It is not a research and
development site. In general, a company should be able to have its product
or service in the market no later than 18 months from the date they enter the
Cluster in order to be accepted into the incubator.
Based upon the following criteria, the BEBC management will make the final
tenant selection decision:
Environmental Start-up: generally must be in the first two years of operation and
must fall within a broad definition of environmental firms
Economic Impact on Community: - includes job creation and sales potential,
indirect economic benefit to contractors, vendors,etc and sales tax revenues
Business Potential - includes quality of business plan, assessment of technology
or product being proposed, clarity of market focus, assessment of competition, etc
Quality of Management Team - business and/or technical experience related to
the focus of the start up
Ability to Utilize Cluster Services - start-up needs, networking potential and
BEBC ability to assist the start-up with its business development
I{MD)c:\wp51\document\eda.app (rev. 6/13195)]
~/I//
Page 21
6. TENANT GRADUATION PROCESS
As indicated, businesses will enter the SESC on a month-to-month lease.
Tenants will be allowed to stay in the Cluster for a maximum of two years. This
will be agreed upon, along with the BEBC/tenant action plan, in the Memorandum
of Understanding executed upon entry. It is anticipated that many start-ups will
outgrow the available space within 12 - 18 months.
V. SECA PUBLIC OUTREACH
A. Outreach Overview
The two proposed SECA initiatives have budgeted for a comprehensive Public Outreach
Plan that will promote both programs, solicit business clients, and educate the public
regarding industry needs and available resources in a coordinated fashion (see
Attachment D). Each program has identified its respective contributions to this proactive
public awareness campaign. These are as follows:
BETRC: The SETRC has budgeted $35,000 annually for public awareness forums and
business outreach/solicitation throughout San Diego County. Additionally, BETRC has
budgeted $6,500 for an electronic newsletter.
BEBC: The SESC has budgeted $12,000 annually for public forums and business
outreach to promote the program.
The Public Outreach Plan calls for the BETRC and BESC to each prepare stand-alone
collateral materials, and to issue press releases, public service announcements and
feature articles independently, as appropriate. However, the Plan stresses the joint
preparation of materials and coordination of community relations activities whenever
possible to leverage individual budgets and optimize coverage.
The overall Public Outreach Plan includes personal contact by SETRC and BEBC staff,
limited advertising in targeted media, feature article placements, press releases to print
media, including newspapers and trade publications, special events, participation in trade
shows and conferences, speaking engagements, and public awareness forums. In
addition, the BETRC sponsored workshops and seminar, in addition to providing direct
client training, will serve a dual purpose of enhancing community awareness of the
Center.
A key component of the BECA Outreach Plan is the coordination with SECA Alliance
partners to optimize public awareness. Two leading partners in this regard will be the
San Diego EDC, and the South San Diego County EDC.
Co-sponsorship by CalEPA, California Trade and Commerce and California Energy
commission of workshops and seminars, tours and trade missions will also result in
enhanced visibility of the BECA program, leveraging their outreach resources.
Additionally, the City of Chula Vista Public Information Coordinator will support the SECA
program, including the integration of SECA-related information into the City's Quarterly
Newsletter, city-initiated press releases and feature articles, and miscellaneous flyers and
I(MD)c~\wp51\document\eda.app (rev. 6/13/95)]
~-~J.
Page 22
hand-outs, as well as into City-sponsored events. The City of Chula Vista Community
Development Department will also promote the program through such vehicles as
exhibitions at business trade shows and conferences, incorporation of information into
Department hand-outs and brochures and its promotional video, and, of course, through
personal contact with business representatives responding to the City's on-going
business recruitment efforts and referrals. Finally, the City of Chula Vista is very
progressive in pursuing a sustainable economy; it is one of the few cities to have a full-
time Environmental Resources Manager on staff. The City's Environmental Resources
Manager will be another source of promotion of the program to both the environmental
and business community.
B. Targeted industry types
1. BECA MARKET ASSESSMENT
The City of Chula Vista commissioned Environmental Business International (EBI)
to undertake a BECA Market Assessment. The Assessment evaluates the
environmental industry as it exists in the country, the state, Southem California
and San Diego County today, as well as the prospects for growth in the future.
The full market study is provided as Attachment E.
The Market Assessment shows that Califomia currently has 13% of the U.S.
environmental business, supporting more than 140,000 jobs. This represents a
$17.5 billion industry, with well over half of these companies in Southern
California. EBI estimates that approximately 2,600 "traditional"
environmental companies exist today in Southern California, approximately
500 in San Diego County. This represents an initial job base in the San
Diego region of an estimated 3,000-4,000 jobs.
Traditional companies can be generally broken down into 3 areas: 1) service,
such as remediation and analytical services; 2) eauioment, such as air pollution
control and waste management equipment; and 3) resources, such as water
utilities and resource recovery. These industries grew over 15% annually in the
1980's, but, like most recession-impacted businesses, have slowed, with a
projected growth of 4.3% through 1998.
.
The study also looks at the emerging "Industrial Ecoloav" businesses and
technologies. This industrial segment moves away from "end-of-pipe" solutions
to oollution orevention and waste minimization. i.e. more in-process solutions.
Examples include biopesticides, water conservation equipment, recycled building
materials, low pollution process equipment, non-polluting solvents, resource
management software, alternative fuel vehicles, and low impact chemicals
processing and management, just to name a few. Southern California industries
at the leading edge of the "industrial ecology" movement include:
. water conservation and recycling technologies
. recycled construction materials technologies
. transportation, esp. electric vehicles
petroleum refining and clean fuels
. energy utility demand side management
[(MD)c:\wp51\document\eda.app (rev.6113/95)J
ye;;/~ )
Page 23
These types of companies are already contacting the SECA.
The growth potential of industrial ecology industries is very high, exemplified by
projected annual revenues of the water conservation and recycling industry of
$250 million in just 5-10 years, and transportation sector revenues of $500 million
in the same period.
Finally, there is the "Green Products" industry. Most of these businesses are
start-ups or small companies with less than $10 million in annual sales.
Examples include organic products, electric vehicles, environmentally safe
cleaners, personal care products, etc.
All told, the total number of environmental companies in the U.S. is
estimated at 91,000, and in Southern California at 3,000. Growth will be
strongest in the industrial ecology (sustainable industrial process)
technologies. At the same time, the market is substantial for traditional
service, equipment and resource firms, particularly due to the San Diego
region's strategic location on the U.S.lMexico border. (Over $8 billion is
projected to be spent on both sides of the border in the next few years to
support environmental infrastructure projects.) Overall, the total
environmental industry market is projected to almost double over the next
six years. This estimate does not even include the thousands of start-up or
early commercialization companies not currently documented.
2.
SOUTHWESTERN COLLEGE SURVEY
-
A recent survey done by Southwestern College examined environmental
companies in the Southern California region. Of the total 200 respondents, 20%
were in San Diego County. It was found that: water treatment technologies are
an important segment in this region, due to the pressure to conserve and reclaim
scarce resources; emergency response is a growing portion of the hazardous
waste segment; more than 50% requested Mexico export assistance; many
companies recognized the immediate window of opportunity to enter Mexico
market; and a number of the major environmental engineering, consulting and
construction companies have their corporate offices in Southern California.
This all points to a large and growing environmental industry market in Southern
Califomia.
3.
SETRC CLIENTS
The SETRC is designed to provide technical and business development
assistance to both traditional and emerging industrial ecology businesses and
entrepreneurs. SETRC services will facilitate the partnering of start-ups and
established firms, "industrial ecology" consultants and "traditional" firms needing
their services; buyers and sellers of environmental equipment; and general
matching of companies with markets. These types of SETRC services will be
most effective through the networking of diverse types of environmental
companies (buyers and sellers).
((MD)c:\wp51\document\eda.app (rev. 6113195)]
~
.2/ ~? j
Page 24
4. SESC CLIENTS
The SESC will be designed to attract a wide diversity of environmental start-ups
to the Cluster. Generally, the SESC will recruit businesses working to solve
environmental problems, including those that focus on environmental
technologies, approaches to sustainable development, and environmental
efficiency. As discussed earlier, this diversity will create a synergy between start-
ups, where each may have opportunities to create joint ventures with some other
business in the Cluster, and it will minimize direct competition. Therefore, the
targeted audience will include companies from such diverse areas as energy
efficiency, environmental biotech, remediation, solar, conservation, recycled and
"green" products, environmental services, waste minimization, hazardous waste
destruction, and environmental software. There will be an emphasis placed on
recruiting environmental conversions of defense technology and companies
with potential for exporting to Mexico. The SESC Marketing Plan will include
outreach to such groups as environmental and trade associations, venture
capitalists, accounting firms, law firms, universities and community colleges,
Chamber of Commerce, etc. Prior experience at the San Jose Environmental
Business Cluster has shown that the marketing tools delineated in the BEBC
Public Outreach Plan (see Attachment 0), can be utilized easily and inexpensively
tei create rapid and widespread awareness of the Cluster within the environmental
and business community.
VI. BECA BUDGET
A. BECA Expenses
The planned three year operating budget for the BECA program totals $3,187,823. The
budget can be broken down as follows:
BECA Administration*
SETRC Operations
BEBC Operations
BECA Facility
In-kind contribution
. Initial Retrofit
$778,568.00
1,216,805.00
771,621.00
-
378,829.00
42.000.00
TOTAL $3,187,823.00
*SECA Interim City Personnel and related operating costs; and In-kind City staff support.
[(MD}c:\wp51\document\eda.app (rev. 6/13195)]
~-~f'
Page 25
B. BECA Funding Sources
BECA funding sources include state and federal grants, City of Chula Vista cash and in-
kind contributions, and Rohr Inc.'s donation of a BECA facility for the life of the EDA
grant. The total BECA budget also includes projected program revenues. BECA 3-year
revenues can be broken down as follows:
AMOUNT
$2,000,000
100,000
161,977
68,412
378,829
477.823
$3,187,823
SOURCE
U.S. Dept. of Commerce EDA grant
California Defense Adjustment matching grant
City of Chula Vista contribution
City of Chula Vista in-kind support
Rohr building donation
Projected Program Revenues
TOTAL 3-YEAR REVENUES
C. BECA - Goals to Become Self-Supporting
The BECA program is intended to ultimately be operated as a non-profit entity. The City
of Chula Vista is acting as a catalyst to this end. The BECA Advisory Board and the
BECA Director will be charged with pursuing the viability of this goal, combined with the
goal of transitioning the BETRC and the BEBC from dependency upon EDA funding to
self-sufficiency.
The three-year budget approved by EDA reflects these goals. First year funding takes
into consideration the phasing in of staff and service delivery; Year II reflects full
operation; and Year III reflects a "weaning" from EDA funding, as the BECA moves
towards self-sufficiency. Specifically, the Year III funding level is reduced by
approximately $150,000, or 25% of Year II staff expenditures. (Also note that the
Environmental Compliance Specialist position is not proposed to be filled in Year I, but
is proposed to be filled in Years II and 111.)
The $150,000 in reduced Year III funding is planned to be covered by new BECA
revenues through one or more of the following sources:
. corporate sponsorships
. client fees
. participating cities and/or county contribution(s)
. foundation grant(s)
. new state and/or federal grant(s)
. equity participation
Projected budgets for Years IV and forward have been prepared based upon enhanced
revenues from the above sources.
[(MD)c:\wp51\document\eda.app (rev.6113195)J
Page 26
~/-jt
BORDER ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY RESOURCE CENTER IBETRC) PLANNED MILESTONES
1st 2nd 3rd 4th
MILESTONES - YEAR I QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER
1. Employ qualified BETRC staff as provided for in Scope of Services.
a) Recruit and hire an MIS consultant. Hire MIS
Consultant
b) Prepare a Personnel Training Plan and Budget. Submit Plan
2. Identify existing electronic databases of interest to environmental Establish Maintain & Maintain & Maintain &
businesses, high tech businesses, businesses interested in international System Upgrade Upgrade Upgrade
, trade (with 'an emphasis on the Mexico and Latin America market) and
businesses interested in environmental management and regulatory
compliance.
3. Prepare and execute AGREEMENT's with BECA partners to provide for Minimum 3 Min 3 Additional Maintain
on-line participation by BECA and BETRC in appropriate databases. AGREEMENT's additional AGREEMENT's & Upgrade
AGREEMENT's as appropriate.
Maintain and
Upgrade.
4. Identify hard copy materials, including subscriptions to publications, to Maintain Maintain Maintain
be initially acquired for the BETRC library. Order materials as & Upgrade & Upgrade & Upgrade
necessary.
5. Regularly update the BETRC library resources. Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing
6. Provide direct, one-on-one counseling and technical assistance via
outside consultants. Assist clients in the following areas (assumes
average of 12.5 hrs. per client):
~ a) Business development assistance (preparation of business plans, 2 clients B clients 10 clients 1 0 clients
management techniques, market development, including site
location, advertising and public relations, market demographics,
customer services, legal structure, licenses, permits, human
resource management, insurance requirements)
~ b) International trade! Mexico and Latin America market emphasis 1 client 6 clients 8 clients 8 clients
market research and development, trade leads, import!export
~ assistance, trade regulations, maquiladora operations, cultural
,-, training)
"
.
[(MDlc:\wp51\document\430.95 {rev. June 13, 1995)]
ATTACHMENT 2 to
EXHIBIT A
:lge 1
1st 2nd 3rd 4th
MILESTONES - YEAR I . QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER
c) Technical assistance (innovation and technology transfer, 2 clients 8 clients 1 0 clients 10 clients
commercialization, technology research and application,
productivity enhancement)
d) Environmental Management (pollution prevention and waste 1 client 4 clients 5 clients 5 clients
minimization training)
e) Environmental Regulatory Compliance Assistance (referrals; on- 2 clients 8 clients 1 0 clients 10 clients
site evaluations and follow-up recommendations/assistance).
Level of assistance dependent upon obtaining funding for BETRC
staff person (see #11 and 12 below).
f) Financial Assistance (Venture capital, Loan packaging, Grant 1 client 6 clients 8 clients 8 clients
applications, cash flow management, sources of capital,
financial analysis)
g) Procurement (government and private contracts and awards) 1 client 4 clients 5 clients 5 clients
h) Minority Business Development 15% 15% 15% 15%
7. Provide direct, one-on-one counseling and technical assistance via
BETRC staff. Assist clients in the following areas (assumes average of
. 20 hrs. per client and 60% of staff time dedicated to client service
beginning in Quarter 2):
a) Business development assistance (preparation of business plans, 3 clients 9 clients 1 5 clients 20 clients
~ management techniques, market development, including site
location, advertising and public relations, market demographics,
customer services, legal structure, licenses, permits, human
resource management, insurance requirements)
~ b) International trade/ Mexico and Latin America market emphasis 2 clients 9 clients 12 clients 20 clients
\ market research and development, trade leads, import/export
~ assistance, trade regulations, maquiladora operations, cultural
training)
\ c) Technical assistance (innovation and technology transfer, 2 clients 8 clients 1 2 clients 1 5 clients
commercialization, technology research and application,
productivity enhancement)
d) Environmental Management (pollution prevention and waste 2 clients 8 clients 1 2 clients 20 clients
minimization training)
llMD)c:\wp51\document\430.95 (rev. June 13,1995)]
Page 2
1 st 2nd 3rd 4th
MILESTONES - YEAR I . QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER
e) Environmental Regulatory Compliance Assistance (referrals; on-
site evaluations and follow-up recommendations/assistance).
Level of assistance dependent upon obtaining funding for BETRC
staff person (see #11 and 12 below).
f) Financial Assistance (Venture capital. Loan packaging, Grant 1 client 6 clients 8 clients 10 clients
applications, cash flow management, sources of capital,
financial analysis)
g) Procurement (government and private contracts and awards) 1 client 6 clients 8 clients 1 0 clients
h) Minority Business Development
8. Provide direct counseling to tenants of the BEBC (assumes 20 hr/per 4 clients 10 clients 1 2 clients 1 5 clients
client).
9. Provide information dissemination and referral services. # referrals # referrals # referrals # referrals
10. Utilize volunteers, interns, faculty, and low-cost private consultants as Place 2 Place 3 Place 3 Place 3
well as specialized professional resources in provided client services. Positions Positions Positions Positions
11. Identify and pursue funding and partnership opportunities related to Pursue with Pursue with Pursue with Pursue with
~ hiring an Environmental Regulatory Compliance Specialist; hire and train CALEPA and CALEPA and CALEPA and CALEPA and
as appropriate. CA Trade and CA Trade and CA Trade and CA Trade and
~ Commerce Commerce Commerce Commerce
~ Agency, and Agency, and Agency, and Agency, and
""
~ other potential other potential other potential other potential
\ local partners, local partners, local partners, local partners,
including including including including
utilities, non- utilities, non- utilities, non- utilities, non-
profit, profit, profit, profit,
corporate, etc. corporate, etc. corporate, etc. corporate, etc.
12. Update the existing incomplete inventory (Directory) of BECA partners Complete Update & Update & Update &
to include all existing and proposed cooperative service providers and Directory Maintain Maintain Maintain
resource groups. The inventory will include a contact person, address,
phone and fax; a description of the entity; and status profile of
communication and cooperative efforts with each of these partners.
13. Maintain a Master list of all executed AGREEMENT's, and an original Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing
copy of each executed AGREEMENT on file.
14. Implement the AGREEMENT with the San Diego Technology Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing
Council/City of San Diego Regional Economic Conversion Council.
[(MD)c:\wp51\document\430.95 (rev. June 13, 1995)]
Page 3
1 st 2nd 3rd 4th
MILESTONES - YEAR I . QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER
15. Coordinate consulting and technical assistance services with other Initiate Complete Complete Maintain
public, private and academic business support service providers, discussions minimum 3 balance of
including BECA partners. Secure Cooperative Agreements with each of with each AGREEMENT's AGREEMENT's
these partners, including at a minimum: CaIEPA, California Trade and
Commerce Agency, California Energy Commission, California
Environmental Technology Center, UCSD, SDSU center for International
Business Education and Research, BEAC, San Diego District Office of
U.S. Foreign Commercial Service, U.S. Department of Commerce.
16. Coordinate, with the City and the BEBC, in developing a BECA Advisory Form Boards Finalize Ongoing staff Ongoing staff
Board, as well as a BECA Technical Advisory Committee and a BECA and recommended support support
Financial Advisory Committee. Recommend initial members. Committees policies and
Recommend candidates to fill vacancies. Recommend Boards and procedures
Committees policies and procedures in coordination with BEBC. Provide
staff support as requested by BECA Director.
17. Identify and pursue joint venture and Pilot Program opportunities related Initiate Initiate Identify joint Identify joint
9-J to cross-border environmental clean-up, international trade and U.S. discussions discussions venture venture
.......... business development with the following entities: Border Environmental with, at a with, at a opportunities opportunities
, Cooperation Commission (BECCl. the Commission for Environmental minimum, minimum, and and recommend
"J Cooperation (CEC), U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Department of BECC, DOC, BECC, DOC, recommend cooperative
Defense, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S. Department of US EPA US EPA cooperative agreements
Energy, and/or the White House Office of Strategic Technologies, and agreements
other White House offices. These activities should incorporate
strategies that directly benefit Chula Vista businesses and the Chula
Vista economy.
18. Establish and maintain linkages to Mexican government agencies and In iti ate Submit Execute Execute
officials, Mexican businesses, and bi-national organizations related to discussions recommended AGREEMENT's AGREEMENT's
general and environmental technology trade opportunities and to with/a-d AGREEMENT's
NAFT A. These linkages are to include at a minimum: regarding with these and
a) the Mexican Ministry of Social Development - the agency BETRC joint other identified
coordinating the environment improvement program for the ventures Mexico
Mexican/U.S. Border (SEDESOL) resources
b) Science and Technology Council of the State of Baja California,
Ministry of Economic Development, State Government of Baja
California (COBA YCT)
c) Western Maquiladora Trade Association
d) U.S./Mexico Border Progress Foundation
UMDlc:\wpS1\document\430.95Irev. June 13, 19951l
Page 4
1st 2nd 3rd 4th
MILESTONES - YEAR I . QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER
19. Develop a comprehensive Marketing Plan and Budget describing how Prepare and Complete Update Update
BETRC will be promoted to the International (with emphasis on Mexico). begin development Marketing Plan Marketing Plan
US, California, San Diego region environmental industry, the South Bay dissemination of
high tech industry, and the regional general industry community in of initial recommended
terms of environmental management and regulatory compliance. collateral Marketing Plan
Identify cooperative marketing opportunities. materials.
Prepare
Preliminary
recommended
Marketing Plan
20. Implement marketing activities in the following areas:
a) Advertising (production and placement)
b) BECA Brochure, featuring BETRC and BEBC (production and
distribution)
c) BETRC flyer (production and distribution)
d) Trade show (Exhibit production and trade show participation)
e) Direct mail (production and distribution)
f) Personal business outreach (off-site personal contacts)
g) Trade missions (emphasis on Northwestern Mexico)
h) Reverse Trade Missions (inbound business and government
official delegations)
i) Community Outreach Forums
21. Provide hands-on training programs for businesses in the areas
identified in the Scope of Work
a) Develop BETRC Training Master Plan and Budget, identifying
targeted audiences (business sectors), specific topics,
cooperative partners, and locations
~~' Sponsor and/or co-sponsor workshops and seminars in at least
the following areas:
. environmental business issues
-.......... . environmental management
. environmental regulatory compliance
[(MD)c:\wp51\document\430.95 (rev. June 13, , 995))
Page 5
1st 2nd 3rd 4th
MILESTONES - YEAR I . QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER
22. Sponsor or co-sponsor major forum for U.S. businesses operating in the 1 Events
Western and border states and for Mexico businesses and governmental
officials to promote U.S. environmental technology products and
services to Mexico, especially the northern border region.
23. Participate on regional and statewide environmental industry-related
advisory boards and committees.
24. Participate in and make presentations to environmental business and Identify FY 6 Events 9 Events 1 2 Events
economic development related organizations, agencies forums and 1995
conferences. opportunities.
3 Events
25. Develop a 1, 2 and 3 Year SETRC Strategic Plan which establishes Submit Draft Submit Final
goals and objectives regarding achieving SETRC financial self- Recommended
sufficiency and related measures to achieve those goals. Strategic Plan
a) Develop guidelines for charging fees for services, and establish Submit Draft Submit Final
fee schedule. guidelines and Recommended
fee schedule Guidelines and
Fee Schedule
b) Develop and implement screening policies and procedures for Complete initial Finalize policies
determining the needs of individual c1ient(s) and appropriate policies and and forms
service provider(s). forms
c) Develop a screening mechanism for determining which clients Complete initial
will be required to pay service fees. screening
mechanism
d) Assist City in developing an alternative non-profit administrator
to replace the Interim Non-Profit (CSIN)
e) Develop long-term recommendations regarding establishment of
a permanent non-profit organization to oversee the SETRC
and/or SESC independently of the City.
26. Establish a Consultant Pool for use by SETRC clients. Utilize
professional consultants at reduced fees or at no cost to clients.
~~
[(MD)c:\wp51\document\430.95 (rev. June 13,1995)]
Page 6
1st 2nd 3rd 4th
MILESTONES - YEAR I . QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER
a) Identify types of consultants. individuals. and/or firms to be Submit Establish Initial Expand
~ included in the Consultant Pool as well as process for selection recommended Consultant consultant pool
'-..... of individual consultants. types of Pool; Minimum as needed
\ consultants of 3
\;J and selection consultants for
procedures each service
area
b) Develop Policy Guidelines for access by clients to the Consultant Submit
Pool. including associated fees and prioritization of access. recommended
policy
27. Assist in developing and implementing an Environmental Microenterprise
Revolving Loan Fund for BEBC tenants.
a) Recommend Chula Vista Environmental MicroEnterprise RLF Submit Submit Final
policies and procedures in conjunction with City's HUD Section Recommended Recommended
108 (Guaranteed Loan) Consultant. Draft Policies Policies and
and Procedures Procedures
b) Use BETRC staff to package BEBe tenant loans. Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Close first loan
28. Update existing Southwestern College U.S. Environmental Business Submit Draft Complete
~ Directory which identifies U.S. companies that offer environmental Document Document
products and services; breaking information out by California, Southern
~ California. San Diego County, and City of Chula Vista geographic
sectors.
29.\ Distribute document summarizing major requirements to do business in Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing
Mexico with emphasis on the import and export of environmental goods
and services.
30. Coordinate with CaIEPA, County of San Diego Air Pollution Control Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing Ongoing
District and Environmental Health Services. and other BECA partners to
offer instruction in environmental management by industrial sectors.
31. Prepare and provide document summarizing primary sources of public Submit Draft Submit Final
and private capital for environmental companies. Document Document
32. Produce and distribute environmental company oriented quarterly Produce and
newsletter. distribute
newsletter
33. Submit Proposed BETRC Budget for Fiscal Year 1996 - 1997 5-15-96
[(MD)c:\wp51\document\430.95 (rev. June 13. 199511
Page 7
1st 2nd 3rd 4th
MILESTONES - YEAR I . QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER QUARTER
34. Submit Proposed BETRC Milestones For Fiscal Year 1996 -,,1997 5-15-96
35. Provide document summarizing environmental regulatory processes and Submit Draft Submit Final
permits applicable to industrial processes in the San Diego County Document Document
region and the City of Chula Vista, including information regarding how
to avoid these regulatory requirements through pollution prevention and
waste minimization, as well as profitable recycling and sourc.e reduction
strategies. Document should be prepared in coordination with San
Diego One Stop Early Assistance Program, San Diego Regional Permit
Assistance Center, BEAC, CaIEPA, San Diego County Environmental
Health Department and the City of Chula Vista Development
Departments.
~
~
~
~
.
I(MD)c:\wp51\document\430.95 (rev, June 13, 1995)J
Page 8
Attachment 3 to EXHIBIT A
INSTRUCTIONS FOR PREPARING
BETRC QUARTERLY AND ANNUAL PROGRESS AND FINANCIAL REPORTS
A quarterly report must be submitted to the City which addresses progress made in accomplishing the
objectives of the SETRC. At a minimum, the report shall Include a status update regarding items
delineated in the Scope of Work and Planned Milestones, and per the report categories identified
below. The City reserves the right to revise this required report format if such revision is deemed to be
useful in assisting the City to better monitor SETRC progress.
PROGRESS REPORT
A. Summarv Narratives of Successes
Describe examples of SETRC successes per (at a minimum) the categories below.
1. EXAMPLE OF SUCCESSFUL COUNSELING OF BETRC CLIENT
In one page or less, provide an example of a successful client who has received
direct assistance from the SETRC. Give a brief description of the clienfs business; .
the problem{s) encountered by the client; the services provided to the client; and, the
outcome of those services (e.g., any jobs created or retained, loans secured, etc.)
2. EXAMPLE OF SUCCESSFUL UTILIZATION OF A COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT
In one page or less, provide an example of how the BErRC utilized a Cooperative
Agreement to optimize service deliver via a BECA partner. Identify the individual or
entity associated with the agreement; describe the service{s) the individual or entity
provided to the center or the center's clients; and, describe the outcome of those
services.
3. EXAMPLE OF AN INNOVATIVE BETRC ACTIVITY OR PROJECT
In one page or less (per activity). describe any innovative activities or projects
undertaken by the SETRC which you think may be of interest to other business
service providers or to the business community.
-.
B.
Summarv of Achievements in Meetinq Milestones
.'
Provide a quarterly summary of accomplishments made during the quarter in question, per
the Scope of Work, Planned Milestones, and specifically, per the categories delineated below.
This report should provide a narrative deScription of achievements as well as a quantitative
measurement of activities and achievements, including where possible the results and Impact
of the activities reported. (For example, "Provided procurement agreement matches to 50
clients of which 30 received awards totaling $40 million.")
oj.
1. INFORMA TrON CLEARINGHOUSE
(Activities to provide on-site access to electronic databases and a general library of
resources, consistent with BETRC goals. Includes initial procurement, upgrading and
updating.)
[(MO)c:\wp51\doc:umenM36.95 (rev. June 9, 1995))
~/-~
Page 1
BETRC QUARTERLY PROGRESS AND FINANCIAL REPORT FORMAT
2. DIRECT CLIENT COUNSELING AND CONSULTATION
(Discussion should include a breakdown of direct counseling services provided to
clients by the following categories, including a quarterly summary of quantitative and
other data collected using the Counseling Record form.)
a. Business Development (planning, management, market development, etc.)
b. International Trade/ Mexico and Latin America market development
(Discuss activities to promote increased export of environmental goods and
services by regional businesses. Activities may include evaluating business
firms' capabilities, problems and opportunities in exporting, providing
counseling, training and outreach assistance, participation with pUblic and
private section organizations involved in export development, data base
development match services and market research, coordination with the San
Diego World Trade Center, etc.)
c. Technical Assistance/Innovation and Technology Transfer
(Discuss activities to transfer federal government environmental technology
having commercial potential, including related expertise and equipment, to
private business. Also discuss the transfer of innovation and technology from
business to business.)
d. Environmental Management AssistancelTraining
(Discuss activities that entail advising businesses of environmental
management policies and practices.)
e.
Environmental Regulatory Compliance
...
(Describe efforts to assist businesses in the San Diego region to achieve
compliance with environmental regulations, including technical assistance and
financial assistance.)
f.
Financial Assistance/Capital Formation
-.J.
(Discuss efforts to develop capital for environmental business, e.g., loans,
grants, venture capital, etc. This may include developing close linkages with
specialized BICs, venture capitalist, Certified Development Company (CDC),
state and local finance programs, etc.)
g. Procurement assistance
(Discuss activities which foster opportunities for increasing environmental
businesses share of procurement dollars spent by the private sector,
government units and prime contractors. Activities may include conferences,
computer match services, assistance to businesses with a Certificate of
Competency, prime contractor outreach, etc.)
((MD)c:'Mp51\docune0t\436.95 (rev. June 9, 1995)J
~02/--/~
Page 2
BETRC QUARTERLY PROGRESS AND FINANCIAL REPORT FORMAT
h. Minority Business Development
(Discuss activities which help minorities participate in the free enterprise
system. Activities may include linking minority clients with other assistance
opportunities, conferences, etc.)
i. Direct counseling to BEBC tenants
(Describe counseling provided directly to BEBC tenants, by tenant type, need,
type of counseling and outcome.)
j. other
3. PARTNERSHIP DEVELOPMENT
(Describe activities to recruit, develop and oversee public and private resources to
provide counseling and training, outreach services, trade missions, etc.; discuss
development and implementation of Agreements for cooperative service delivery,
specifically including progress related to the Agreement with the San Diego
Technology Council.)
4. LINKAGES TO AND JOINT VENTURES WITH MEXICO BUSINESSES AND
GOVERNMENT AGENCIES
(Describe activities related to enhancing relations with Mexican business and
government agencies to promote cross-border trade and innovative joint ventures.)
6. INFORMATION DISSEMINATION AND REFERRAL SERVICES
(On-site activities, business outreach, and referrals to BECA partners.)
6. BETRC ADVISORY BOARD AND COMMITTEES; INVOLVEMENT OF
ENVIRONMENTAL INDUSTRY
--
(Describe activities related to development and staffing the Advisory Board and
Committees and related policies and procedures. Also describe achievements in
involving other environmental companies in the BETRC program development and
implementation.)
i
7.
MARKETING AND PUBLIC RELATIONS
oj.
(Describe activities related to advertising, collateral materials, trade shows, direct mail,
and personal outreach. Describe cooperative marketing agreements/activities. Clarify
what proactive steps have been taken to market the BETRC to existing and
prospective Chula Vista businesses.)
8.
GROUP TRAINING
(Describe activities related to holding workshops or seminars, including a quarterly
summary of quantitative and other data collected using the BETRC Training Record
forms. Identify training activities held within City of Chula Vista.)
l(MD)c:\wp51\doalment\436.95 (rev. June 9, 1995)]
~ c2/-??
Page 3
BETRC QUARTERLY PROGRESS AND FINANCIAL REPORT FORMAT
9. NA TlONAUINTERNA TIONAlMAJOR FORUMS
(Describe forums sponsored and/or co-sponsored by BETRC targeting national and/or
international audiences.)
10. INNOVATIVE PROJECTS
(Describe any creative projects initiated by the BETRC including Demonstration
Programs, joint ventures, program proposals, etc.)
11. STRATEGIC PLAN TO "WEAN" BETRC FROM EDA FUNDS
(Describe short- and long-range plan development, including the development of
policies and procedures regarding fees for services.)
12. ASSISTANCE TO CHULA VISTA BUSINESSES
(Describe activities related to providing assistance to existing and/or prospective
Chula Vista businesses, including coordination with Chula Vista Development
Departments.)
13. PERSONNEL MANAGEMENT
(Describe any significant activities in terms of vacancies, recruitment and hiring,
disciplinary actions, etc.)
14. PARTICIPATION IN REGIONAL AND STATEWIDE FORUMS AND BOARDS AND
COMMITTEES
(Discuss BETRC speaking engagements and membership in BECA-related advisory
bodies.)
15. ENVIRONMENTAL BUSINESS NEWSLETTER AND OTHER BETRC
PUBLICA TrONS
(Discuss status of these publications.)
.'
16.
ADVOCACY AND GENERAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
-.j.
(Efforts to represent environmental business interesls within the BETRC's territory to
improve the climate for environmental businesses and to contribute to the vitality of
the environmental business sector within San Diego region, Southbay and Chula
Vista. Advocacy may include such activities as: public speeches, testimonies before
state and/or Federal legislatures, meeting with state or federal agencies and with
environmental business professional associations.)
17.
CHULA VISTA ENVIRONMENTAL MICRO ENTERPRISE REVOLVING LOAN FUND
(Discuss activities regarding developing and implementing the Environmental
Microenterprise Revolving loan Fund, including status of loan approvals.)
((MO}C::\WP51\d0cumenM36.95 (rev. June 9, 1995)]
Y-2/-?Y
Page 4
BETRC QUARTERLY PROGRESS AND FINANCIAL REPORT FORMAT
c. Financial Report: Summary of Expenditures bv Line Item
Provide a month by month summary of expenditures for the quarter in question. Expenditures
should be categorized by the line items enumerated in the BETRC Program Revenue Budget
and in Exhibit L.
~
#
.'
"-j.
((MD)c:Wlp51\doa.nenM36.95 . (rev. June 9, 1995)J
~J-?/
Page 5
This page Blank
~~/-J7~
ASSOCIATES. INC.
, -'I,'
;r.-
~ ,-'
June 6, 1995
Mr. Ken Lee
Planning Department
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Dear Ken,
Attached is the sketch of the newly-proportioned address sign for the Olympic Training
Center. The old, smaller logo design is also attached for comparison. I will rely on you
to forward this to Councilman Rindone and let me know if there are any problems.
Please call me as soon as you have discussed the new design with Mr. Rindone, to let me
know if we can move forward with this sign.
Thanks.
Laurie J. McKinley
LJM/ca
Attachment
cc: Gloria Chadwick, USOC
02'/IfL' /
PHONE: 619 296-4394 ~ 416 UNIVERSITY AVENUE, SUITE 200 ~ SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA 92103 ~ FAX: 619 296-5840
o
4'-8"
@
j
4"
1 '-10"
3"
1"____
1.5'Y--::
Blue vinyl copy, V2.
Futura Med. Italic.
I
M
3'-9"
~~!?
~
."""",--~~~
.-..... ~ ~ ~
-""""-""""-~
CI1Y OF
(HULA VISfA
4"
800
ORANGE AVE.
. '4-:-:':-:<1':-:-:-:-:':-:
~p
q"
.7~'
Vinyl logo and
logotype: Calon #12
'Burgundy', typestyle:
Optima
.1875' long
aluminum
"Ribbon". Apply to
face with "Pop"
rivets, see page
50 for detail.
Apply 1/32" Lexan c-J.
to face with VHB ,
tape, paint entire
piece red, P4. "II(
/ Cabinet fabricated o~
.090" alum inum with rv
2"x2" box-section \)
galvanized steel tubes.
Paint enti re sign off
white to match P6 with
NO texture additive.
Cabinet attached to
structure with stainless
steel, countersunk
socket-head fasteners.
Use insulating material
to prevent support tubes
from coming in direct
contact with cabinet.
Fasteners to penetrate
cabinet on sides oniy,
and the heads are to be
painted to match the
surrounding cabinet.
I Olympic Training Center / Chula Vista
MADDUX 0 COMPANY
3465 Camino del Rio South
Suite 202
San Dieao, CA 92108
FAX619~1584n859
619.1584/089"1
Page
Title / Address/C.V. Monument
Job # / 1202 Qty./ 1
Date / 5130/95 Scale / l~::::l'-O"
Rev. ;' #3 Drawn I EL
5'~.'1S NPW
/~
,~\
(I \\
; ;'"""" :.,- (
:,( /J I
'." \, )
['v
~~
I -; l'VMv\ "'\ '\
/ I ,I I \
I I' I') \
I I I I I
\ i I ) \
' : / i (' /
) I '
I I i \
\
I.
o~
/
! 1-'
i~
I
a
~
~
~
4'-3-
\
\
~
:)
I " I
1:~L_jjJ-
p:~
t
1'-3,5"
4"
5"
.. ,-"
I '
2"
31ue 'tinyl cooy, '12,
Futura Med, Itaiic,
~u~
--...-
~....;- ......... -;:-;:
-----
........~~~
(llY OF
(HULA VISTA
2800
I'.'.
'.'.<1'<<\'.>
<>
IIA
Maddux & Company
a9S9 Rio San Diego Dr.
Suite 370
San Diego, CA 92108
FAX 6191293/3150
S19/293/i91Q
c::-'
c~c:,}~O ,
C~C:j'~8: Gdien T~ 2
'3ur~~nc/. t'/oesr./12:
r,,,.:.....,,
....",'111;.1
..........
. ~ 375" :ong
aluminum
'~ibbon', Aoply to
face with 'Pop'
rivets, see page
50 for detail.
Aooly 1/32" Lexan
to face with VH 8
tape, paint entire
piece red, P4.
/ Cabinet fabricated of
,090" aluminum with
2":<2" box-section
galvanized steel tubes.
?aint entire sign off
white to match P6 with
~JO texture additive,
Cabinet attached to
structure with stainless
steel, countersunk
socket-head fasteners.
csa insulating material
to prevent support tube,
from coming in direct
contact with cabinet.
Fasteners to penetrate
cabinet on sides only,
and the heads are to be
)ainted to match the
surrouncing cabinet.
Inl1;:1ntiMI" ,
I Olympic Training Center / Chula Vista
TItle / Address/C.V. Monument
Job # 11202
Date/2l1S19S Scale/l"~l'.o.
Rev. 1 Drawn I EL
Page
1