Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 1995/05/02 Tuesday, May 2, 1995 4:00 p.m. /'1 declare Nnder penaity of perjury tbat , am employed by the City of Chula Vista in the Office of the City Clerk and that I posted this AgenJa/Notice on the Bulletin Board at the Publi~/S rvi 8 Building an a Ci Hall n DA',ED or,:Z7. ?5SIGNED .. Council Chambers Public Services Building CALL TO ORDER 1. ROLL CALL: Councilmembers Moot _, Padilla _, Rindone _, and Mayor Horton_. 2. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG. SILENT PRAYER 3. APPROVAL OF MINUTES: April 15, 1995 (Special Meeting), April 18, 1995 and April 19, 1995 (Special Meeting). 4. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY: a. Oath of Office for newly appointed Councilmember - Scott D. Alevy. b. Proclaiming the week of May 1 through May 7,1995 as "Youth Week." Mayor Horton will present the proclamation to Ted Eckert, Exalted Ruler of Chula Vista Elks Lodge, and Garry Hummel, Youth Activities Chairman. c. Proclaiming the month of May 1995 as "Older Americans Month." May is the month that the nation takes time to acknowledge and celebrate the achievements and contributions of its older citizens. During the month there are public recognitions of elders with particular attention to the Centenarians in the community. The Chula Vista Commission on Aging each year publicly thanks the local Centenarians for their contributions. The Centenarians are also invited to attend the Council meeting in which the proclamation is presented. ***** Effective April 1, 1994, there have been new amendments to the Brown Act. The City Council must now reconvene into open session to report any final actions taken in closed session and to adjourn the meeting. Because of the cost involved, there will be no videotaping of the reconvened portion of the meeting. However, final actions reported will be recorded in the minutes which will be available in the City Clerk's Office. ***** CONSENT CALENDAR (Items 5 through 6) The staff recommendations regarding the foUowing items listed under the Consent Calendar will be enacted by the Council by one motion without discussion unless a Councilmember, a member of the public or City staff requests that the item be puUed for discussion. If you wish to speak on one of these items, please fiU out a "Request to Speak Form" available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. (Complete the green form to speak in favor of the staff recommendation; complete the pink form to speak in opposition to the staff recommendation.) Items puUed from the Consent Calendar will be discussed after Board and Commission Recommendations and Action Items. Items puUed by the public will be the first items of business. 5. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS: a. Letter from the City Attorney stating that there were no observed reportable actions taken from the Closed Session of 4/25/95. It is recommended that the letter be received and filed. Agenda -2- May 2, 1995 6. RESOLUTION 17882 WAIVING THE CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCESS AND APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH MCDANIEL ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. FOR BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE WIDENING OF THE OTAY RIVER BRIDGE CROSSING - On 10/19/93, Council approved an agreement with the County of San Diego for the construction of the Otay Valley Road bridge where the road was washed out by the 1993 floods. The agreement required the County to use FEMA funds to construct a bridge 80 feet long by 28 feet wide conforming to their standards and the City to widen the bridge from 28 feet to 54 feet, plus all environmental impact mitigation measures. To comply with the agreement, the County hired McDaniel Engineering Company, Inc. (McDaniel) to design and prepare the plans for the project. On 11/30/93, the City Manager approved an agreement with McDaniel. The proposed contract provides for bridge construction consulting services. The services will be provided on a time and material basis and will not exceed $15,000 without further approval by Council. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Director of Public Works) * * END OF CONSENT CALENDAR * * PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCES The following Uems have been advertised and/or posled as public hearings as required by law. If you wish 10 speale 10 any Uem, please fill oullhe "Requesllo Speak Form" available in Ihe lobby and submit it 10 Ihe City Clerk prior 10 Ihe meeting. (Complele Ihe green form 10 speak in favor of Ihe slaff recommendation; complele Ihe pink form 10 speak in opposition 10 Ihe slaff recommendation.) Commenls are limited 10 five minules per individual. None submitted. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS This is an opportunity for the general public to address Ihe City Council on any subject mailer wilhin Ihe Council'sjurisdiction Ihat is nol an item on Ihis agenda for public discussion. (Slale law, however, generally prohibUs the City Council from laking action on any issues nol included on Ihe posled agenda.) If you wish 10 address the Council on such a subjecl, please complele Ihe yellow "Requesllo Speak Under Oral Communications Form n available in Ihe lobby and submit illo Ihe City Clerk prior 10 the meeting. Those who wish 10 speak, please give your name and address for record purposes and follow up action. Your lime is limited 10 Ihree minules per speaker. BOARD AND COMMISSION RECOMMENDATIONS This is Ihe time Ihe City Council will consider items which have been forwarded to them for consideration by one of Ihe City's Boards, Commissions and/or Commillees. 7. REPORT RESPONSE TO A COUNCIL REFERRAL ON GENERAL ROCA, ARGENTINA REGARDING ST A TUS OF PROPOSED RELATIONSHIP - (International Friendship Commission) Agenda -3- May 2, 1995 ACTION ITEMS The uems listed in this section of the agenda are expected to elicu substantial discussions and deliberations by the Council, stqff, or members of the general public. The items will be considered individually by the Council and staff recommendations may in certain cases be presented in the alternative. Those who wish to speak, please fill out a "Request to Speak" fonn available in the lobby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Public comments are limited to five minutes. 8. RESOLUTION 17883 APPROVING A CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENT WITH ARTIST TEAM VICTOR OROZCO OCHOA AND JOHN NEAL HILL FOR TIlE SOUTH CHULA VISTA LmRARY PUBLIC ART MURAL PROJECT - The California Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act grant includes $46,821 (one percent of construction) for public art. A public artist selection process was conducted to select an artist to erect a mural in the storyhour room based on the theme of International Friendship. Staff recommends approval of the resolution. (Library Director) 9. REPORT UPDATE ON REGIONAL SEWER ISSUES - An oral report will be given by staff. ITEMS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT CALENDAR This is the time the City Council will discuss items which have been removed from the Consent Calendar. Agenda items pulled at the request of the public will be considered prior to those pulled by Councilmembers. Public comments are limited to five minutes per individual. OTHER BUSINESS 10. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT/SI a. Scheduling of meetings. II. MAYOR'S REPORT/SI a. Ratification of appointment: Kevin B. Clark - Resource Conservation Commission. b. Council designee for Multiple Species Conservation Program Committee. 12. COUNCIL COMMENTS Councilmember Rindone a. Referral - Port Commission Options ADJOURNMENT The meeting will adjourn to (a closed session and thence to) the Regular City Council Meeting on May 9, 1995 at 6:00 p.m. in the City Council Chambers. A Joint Meeting of the City Council/Redevelopment Agency will be held immediately following the City Council meeting. ***** Agenda -4- May 2, 1995 CLOSED SESSION Unless the City Attorney, the City Manager or the City Council stales otherwise at this time, the Council will discuss and deliberate on the foUowing items of business which are pennitted by law to be the subject of a closed session discussion, and which the Council is advised should be discussed in closed session to best protect the interests of the City. The Council is required by law to return to open session, issue any reports of JiBJJl action taken in clased session, and the votes taken. However, due to the typical length of time taken up by closed sessions, the videotaping will be tenninated at this point in order to save costs so that the Council's return from closed session, reports of JiBJJl action taken, and a4journment will not be videotaped. Nevertheless, the report of final action taken will be recorded in the minutes which will be available in the City Clerk's Office. 13. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL REGARDING: 1, Existing litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 . Chula Vista and nine other cities vs. the County of San Diego regarding solid waste issues (trash litigation). . City of Chula Vista vs. the County of San Diego regarding approval of a major use permit for Daley Rock Quarry. 2, Anticipated litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 . Significant exposure to litigation pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 54956.9: 1. . Metro Sewer Adjustment Billing (water reclamation and expansion costs) and EPA lawsuit. CONFERENCE WITH LABOR NEGOTIATOR - Pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6 . Agency negotiator: John Goss or designee for CVEA, WCE, Executive Management, Mid- Management, and Unrepresented. Employee organization: Chula Vista Employees Association (CVEA) and Western Council of Engineers (WCE). Unrepresented employee: Executive Management, Mid-Management, and Unrepresented. 14. REPORT OF ACTIONS TAKEN IN CLOSED SESSION ***** April 27, 1995 SUBJECT: The Honorable Mayor and city Council ~(}j John D. GosS, City Manager ~Gq ~~f city Council Meeting of May 2, 19~ TO: FROM: This will transmit the agenda and related materials for the regular City Council meeting of Tuesday, May 2, 1995. Comments regarding the written Communications are as follows: 5a. This is a letter from the city Attorney stating that there were no observed reportable actions taken by the city Council in Closed Session on April 25, 1995. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT THIS LETTER BE RECEIVED AND FILED. JDG:mab isla, Gztifintia PROCLAIMING THE WEEK OF MAY 1 THROUGH MAY 7, 1895 AS YOUTH WEEK IN THE em OF CHULA VISTA, CAUFORNIA WHEREAS, the Benevolent and protective Order of Elks has designated the week beginning May 1 lI'Irough May 7, 1995 as YOUTH WEEK to honor America', Junior ewz- for their accomplishments, II1d to give fitIlng recognition of their Hl'Vices to community, state and nation; and WHEREAS, Chula Vista Lodge No. 2011 will sponsor an observance on May 4, 1995 In tribute to 11'18 Junior Citizens of 11'111 community; and WHEREAS, we should demonstrate our partnership wi1h youth, our understanding of lI'Ielr hopes and asplretlons and a slnoere willingness to help prepare 1hem In fNeI'Y way for lhe responsibilities and opportunities of citizenShip: 'NOW, THEREFORE, I, SHIRLEY HORTON, Mayor of the City of Chula VISta, California, do hereby proclaim the week of May 1 1hrough May 7, 1995 as YOUTH WEEK In the City of Chula VIst8, and urge all departments of government, civic, fraternal and patriotic groups, and our cItizenS generally, to perticipate wholeheartedly in Its observance. ,1JtdBf tFis.R.r..dti'ff!l" ~ 19~ ~/II.trI/~A5tL Jj) - / PROCLAIMING THE MONTH OF MAY 1lKl5 AS OIJ)ER AMERICANS MONTH IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CAUFORNIA WHEREAS, May Is the month that the nation takes time to acknowledge ....d celebrate the achievements ....d contributions of its older cltizens; 8I'Id WHEREAS, thouS8l'lds of volunteer hours are expended each month by seniors who essist hundreds of agencies; ....d WHEREAS, this donation of lime, skill ....d expertise enables agencies to greally enhance their services, thus benefitting the enllre community; ....d WHEREAS, Chula Vista hes achieved its excellence. In large part, through the wisdom ....d labor of our senior cltIzens; 8I'Id WHEREAS, It is. filting that the City Joln with the County, the Slate and the Nation In paying tribute to senior citizens: NOW, THEREFORE, I, SHIRLEY HORTON, Mayor of the City of Chula Vista, California, do hereby proclaim the month of May 1995 as OLDER AMERICANS MONTH throughout the City of Chula Vista and commend all of our older cltizens for those contributions so generously given to their community. .,:DUerf tkis2.f1d art! 9'" ~ /9 'IS Akr IJ~ JIozXi><_ ~or!f e Ci!f!f a1tfa o/"A5ta. 'Ie--/ ~V~ ~ ....... - -- ......- ~-- CllY OF CHUlA VISTA OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY From: April 26, 1995 The Honorable Mayor and City cou~ill Bruce M. Boogaard, city Attorney'~ Report Regarding Actions Taken in Closed Session for the Meeting of 4/25/95 Date: To: Re: The city Attorney hereby reports to the best of my knowledge from observance of actions taken in the Closed Session, that there were no actions taken in the Closed Session of 4/25/95 which are required under the Brown Act to be reported. BMB:lgk C:\lt\clossess.no .5'~ - / 276 FOURTH AVE/CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 91910/(619) 691~5037 COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ITEM TITLE: Item ? Meeting Date 5/2/95 Resolution / 7 fJ"'$' ~ Waiving the consultant selection process and approving agreement with McDaniel Engineering Company, Inc. for Bridge Construction Consulting Services for the widening of the Otay River Bridge Crossing in the City 0 Chula Vista (4/5ths Vote: Yes_NoA) SUBMITTED BY: Director of Public Wor City Manager J:i ~ REVIEWED BY: VJ,.' In October 19, 1993, by Resolution No. 17272, Council approved an agreement with the County of San Diego for the construction of the Otay Valley Road bridge where the road was washed out by the 1993 floods (see Attachment A). This agreement required the County to use FEMA funds, to construct a bridge 80 feet long by 28 feet wide conforming to their standards and the City to widen the bridge from 28 feet to 54 feet plus all environmental impact mitigation measures. To comply with this agreement, the County after following their consultant selection process hired McDaniel Engineering Company, Inc. (McDaniel) to design and prepare the plans for this project. Subsequently they awarded a contract to Granite Construction Company to erect the 28 foot wide bridge. On November 30, 1993, the City Manager approved an agreement between the City of Chula Vista and McDaniel for bridge design consulting services for the design of the widening of the Otay Valley River Bridge. In general, that agreement (Attachment B) called for McDaniel to design, prepare plans, specifications, and an estimate for the widening of the bridge across Otay River at a point where Otay Valley Road crosses the river. McDaniel was to provide all necessary coordination with other agencies necessary for their review and approval of the bridge design. The fee for McDaniel's services was set at $21,232.00. Subsequent to approval of the agreement by the City Manager, McDaniel prepared the plans and specifications for the bridge widening. The plans and specifications were used as part of the bid package for the total work required for the Phase II and III Otay Valley Road roadway construction. The City Council awarded the contract to Signs & Pinnick, Inc. which includes the widening of the bridge on June 7, 1994 by Resolution 17518 (Attachment C). The contractor expects to start work early in May. The proposed contract with McDaniel before you tonight, provides for bridge construction inspection consulting services for the Otay Valley River bridge crossing. These services will be provided on a time and material basis, and are not to exceed $15,000 without further Council approval. RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the resolution waiving the consultant selection process and approving agreement with McDaniel Engineering Company, Inc. for Bridge ~-/ Page 2, Item 6 Meeting Date 5/2/95 Construction Consulting Services for the widening of the Otay River Bridge Crossing in the City of Chula Vista not to exceed $15,000 without further Council approval. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: A portion of the Otay Valley Road crossing the Otay River was washed out in January 1993. On October 19, 1993, by Resolution 17272 (Attachment A), the City approved an agreement between the County of San Diego and the City for construction of a bridge over the Otay River on Otay Valley Road. Basically, this agreement called for: 1) The City to address and obtain all mitigation and relevant permits, including habitat enhancement required by the appropriate resource agency for the bridge construction. 2) The County was to construct Phase I of the bridge, which was 28' wide by 80' long fmanced with FEMA funds. 3) The City was required to pay for Phase II of the bridge which consisted of widening the bridge being constructed by the County from 28' wide to 54' wide. As a result of the rains in January 1993, many of the bridges and crossings in the County were damaged or washed out. The County requested proposals from 16 firms for the design of these various bridges and then selected the top six firms for the design of various projects. The County assigned the first project to the top rated company, and the next to the second company, and so on. The firm of McDaniel was chosen by the County to design the Otay River Bridge Crossing project. A review of the consultant selection process indicates that they generally followed the Board of Supervisors Policy for hiring consultants. The only exception was they shortened the time period required to complete the process, because of the emergency nature and urgency in getting the bridges replaced. The bridge proposed by the County was 28 feet wide. However, in order to provide for the City's projected needs of providing one lane northbound, two lanes southbound (a lane southbound is for merging the trucks leaving the Nelson-Sloan gravel yard) and providing a bicycle lane on both the north and southbound directions, the width of the bridge needs to be widened to 54 feet. Pursuant to the City/County agreement, preparation of plans to widen the bridge was the City's responsibility. Since McDaniel did the design plans for the County of San Diego for the 28 feet wide bridge crossing, staff believed it was in the best interest of the City to engage them to prepare the plans for the widening of the bridge. To this effect, we met with McDaniel to negotiate a contract for the design of the bridge crossing needed to accommodate our width. We did not advertise, nor request proposals from other consultants because we felt McDaniel was uniquely qualilled, familiar with the project, has been selected by the County through their consultant selection process, and the cost of their services would be less than $25,000.00. The City Manager on November 30, 1993, approved the agreement between McDaniel and the City in the amount of $21,232.00 for bridge design consulting services for the widening of the bridge. This agreement did not provide for review of shop ~-,Z Page 3, Item~ Meeting Date 5/2/95 drawings submitted by the contractor, redesign for field conditions nor for any inspection services related to the construction of the bridge widening work. We are now ready to begin construction of the Otay Valley Road Phases II & III improvements, which include the widening of the bridge. Engineering Inspection staff has visited the bridge site and determined that the widening work is beyond their level of inspection expertise and suggested that a consultant be hired to supplement their inspection activities. Therefore, it is recommended that a second contract with McDaniel be approved to provide for inspection services on an as needed basis. It is further recommended that Council waive the consultant selection process and approve the proposed agreement with McDaniel in an amount not to exceed $15,000. McDaniel is intimately familiar with the County's portion of the bridge and the design of its subsequent widening. Because of these factors, staff believes it is appropriate to hire the firm of McDaniel to provide inspection services during the construction phase for the portion of the bridge widening. Staff believes McDaniel' is uniquely qualified to provide the bridge inspection services for two important reasons: First, they designed the bridge and the proposed widening; and secondly, any required and necessary changes in design due to existing field conditions should be done by the design professional who originally designed the bridge for both ethical and liability reasons. The hourly costs in this contract are the same as the first contract where the same positions are included. Those costs were the same as the County's, which were obtained through their RFP process. Therefore, we believe the costs are reasonable. Because of these factors, staff recommends the waiving of the consultant selection process and approving the agreement with McDaniel to provide bridge construction consultant servIces. FISCAL IMP ACT: Approval of this agreement will authorize expenditures not to exceed $15,000 for McDaniel Engineering Company, Inc. to be used to pay for services rendered per the agreement. These are sufficient funds budgeted in the Otay Valley Road,Phase III, STM- 319 project to cover the cost of this agreement. The total cost for this project, including the contract, right-of-way expenses, staff, utilities, and material testing is $2,698,652. SLH:STM-319-06 Attachment A - Resolution 17272 NOT SCAItNED Attachment B - Agreement with Consultant for design of Bridge J Attachment C - Resolution 17518 NOT SCANNED . ...... . m:\hoinc\cnginceilagenda\bridgsvs.slh. d-~JI{P-~ RESOLUTION NO. /7~av~ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA WAIVING THE CONSULTANT SELECTION PROCESS AND APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH McDANIEL ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC. FOR BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION CONSULTING SERVICES FOR THE WIDENING OF THE OTAY RIVER BRIDGE CROSSING IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA WHEREAS, in October 19, 1993, by Resolution No. 17272, Council approved an agreement with the county of San Diego for the construction of the Otay Valley Road bridge where the road was washed out by the 1993 floods; and WHEREAS, said agreement required the County to use FEMA funds, to construct a bridge 80 feet long by 28 feet wide conforming to their standards and the city to widen the bridge from 28 feet to 54 feet plus all environmental impact mitigation measures; and WHEREAS, to comply with this agreement, the County after following their consultant selection process hired McDaniel Engineering Company, Inc. (McDaniel) to design and prepare the plans for this project and subsequently they awarded a contract to Granite Construction company to erect the 28 foot wide bridge; and WHEREAS, on November 30, 1993, the city Manager approved an agreement between the City of Chula vista and McDaniel for bridge design consulting services for the design of the widening of the otay Valley River Bridge which agreement called for McDaniel to design, prepare plans, specifications, and an estimate for the widening of the bridge across Otay River at a point where Otay Valley Road crosses the river; and WHEREAS, McDaniel was to provide all necessary coordination with other agencies necessary for their review and approval of the bridge design and the fee for McDaniel's services was set at $21,232.00; and WHEREAS, subsequent to approval of the agreement by the city Manager, McDaniel prepared the plans and specifications for the bridge widening which were used as part of the bid package for the total work required for the Phase II and III Otay Valley Road roadway construction; and WHEREAS, the City Council awarded the contract which includes the widening of the bridge on June 7, 1994 by Resolution 17518 and the contractor expects to start work early in May; and ~--f' WHEREAS, the proposed contract with McDaniel provides for bridge construction inspection consulting services for the otay Valley River bridge crossing; and WHEREAS, these services will be provided on an as needed basis, and are not expected to exceed $15,000. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the City Council of the City of Chula vista does hereby waive the consultant selection process and approve the agreement with McDaniel Engineering Company, Inc. for bridge construction consulting services for the widening of the otay River Bridge Crossing in the city of Chula Vista, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk as Document No. (to be completed by the City Clerk in the final document). BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the city of Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement for and on behalf of the city of Chula vista. "] fO]) Presented by John P. Lippitt, Director of Public Works , City c: \ rs\McDanie1 ~-~ APR 3 - 1995 MEMORANDUM March 31, 1995 File No. STM319 TO: John Goss, City Manager FROM: John P. Lippitt, Director of Public Work~ ~ SUBJECT: Approval of Agreement between the City of Chula Vista and McDaniel Engineering Company, Inc. for bridge construction consulting services for Otay River Bridge Crossing. On June 7, 1994 we awarded the contract to Signs and Pennick, Inc. for the construction of Phases 11 and III of the Otay Valley Road construction which extended from 1200 feet east of Nirvana Avenue to the northerly limits of Otay Rio Subdivision. Included in this project was the widening of the existing bridge which is 82' long and 28' wide over the Otay Valley River. The existing bridge is a two-span, steel girder bridge with timber decking. The widening by the City will be 13 feet on each side to provide a total width of 54 feet. McDaniel Engineering Company, Inc. prepared the design plans for the existing bridge which was just recently completed for the County. They also prepared the plans for our widening of the bridge. Existing staff lacks expertise in the inspection and review of submittals in regard to the bridge construction. McDaniel Engineering Company, Inc. can provide these services. Because McDaniel Engineering is very familiar with the plans and specifications already, we did not advertise nor request proposals from other consultants. Attached for your approval is a two-party agreement between the City and McDaniel Engineering Inc. for the bridge construction consulting services for the Otay River Bridge Crossing. The cost of this work is on a time and material basis not to exceed $15,000. Page 2 and 3 of exhibit A of this agreement outlines the work the consultant is expected to perform. We are requesting that you execute the three copies of the agreement and return them to me. By signing below, you will authorize the encumbrance of $15,000.00 in a Purchase Order for McDaniel Engineering Company, Inc. to be used to pay for the services rendered per this agreement. The funds will come from budgeted CIP project Otay Valley Road Phase III, account number 603-6030-STM319 Please call me at your convenience if you desire additional information or would like to further discuss this request. '1-1/- i') Date :cIb (M:\...\DIlSION\AGREIlS'IM.319) d.-?/u-g Parties and Recital Page(s) Agreement between City of Cbula Vista and McDaniel Engineering Company, Ine. for Bridge Construction Consulting Services for tbe Otay Valley River Bridge Crossing in tbe City of Cbula Vista This agreement ("Agreement"), dated 1- -1f-1~ for the purposes of reference only, and effective as of the date last executed unless another date is otherwise specified in Exhibit A, Paragraph 1 is between the City-related entity as is indicated on Exhibit A, paragraph 2, as such ("City"), whose business form is set forth on Exhibit A, paragraph 3, and the entity indicated on the attached Exhibit A, paragraph 4, as Consultant, whose business form is set forth on Exhibit A, paragraph 5, and whose place of business and telephone numbers are set forth on Exhibit A, paragraph 6 ("Consultant"), and is made with reference to the following facts: Recitals Whereas, the City is desirous to widen the Otay Valley Road bridge crossing of Otay River; and Whereas, the City desires to retain a consultant engineer to provide construction engineering services. Whereas, Consultant warrants and represents that they are experienced and staffed in a manner such that they are and can provide the services required of Consultant to City within the time frames herein provided all in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement; (End of Recitals. Next Page starts Obligatory Provisions.) WPC F:IHOME\l!NGINI!IlR\DESIClN\2PRlYS1M.319 Page 1 i.-( OBLIGATORY PROVISIONS PAGES NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City and Consultant do hereby mutually agree as follows: 1. Consultant's Duties A. General Duties Consultant shall perform all of the services described on the attached Exhibit A, Paragraph 7, entitled "General Duties"; and, B. Scope of Work and Schedule In the process of performing and delivering said "General Duties", Consultant shall also perform all of the services described in Exhibit A, Paragraph 8, entitled" Scope of Work and Schedule", not inconsistent with the General Duties, according to, and within the time frames set forth in Exhibit A, Paragraph 8, and deliver to City such Deliverables as are identified in Exhibit A, Paragraph 8, within the time frames set forth therein, time being of the essence of this agreement. The General Duties and the work and deliverables required in the Scope of Work and Schedule shall be herein referred to as the "Defmed Services". Failure to complete the Defmed Services by the times indicated does not, except at the option of the City, operate to terminate this Agreement. C. Reductions in Scope of Work City may independently, or upon request from Consultant, from time to time reduce the Defmed Services to be performed by the Consultant under this Agreement. Upon doing so, City and Consultant agree to meet in good faith and confer for the purpose of negotiating a corresponding reduction in the compensation associated with said reduction. D. Additional Services In addition to performing the Defmed Services herein set forth, City may require Consultant to perform additional consulting services related to the Defmed Services ("Additional Services"), and upon doing so in writing, if they are within the scope of services offered by Consultant, Consultant shall perform same on a time and materials basis at the rates set forth in the "Rate Schedule" in Exhibit A, Paragraph 11 (C), unless a separate fixed fee is otherwise agreed upon. All compensation for Additional Services shall be paid monthly as billed. E. Standard of Care Consultant, in performing any Services under this agreement, whether Defmed Services or Additional Services, shall perform in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions and in similar locations. WPC F:1H0MEIENG1NEI!llIDESIGNl2PRlYSlM.319 Page 2 t. ---/0 F. Insurance Consultant represents that it and its agents, staff and sub consultants employed by it in connection with the Services required to be rendered, are protected against the risk of loss by the following insurance coverages, in the following categories, and to the limits specified, policies of which are issued by Insurance Companies that have a Best's Rating of "A, Class V" or better, or shall meet with the approval of the City: Statutory Worker's Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance coverage in the amount set forth in the attached Exhibit A, Paragraph 9. Commercial General Liability Insurance including Business Automobile Insurance coverage in the amount set forth in Exhibit A, Paragraph 9, combined single limit applied separately to each project away from premises owned or rented by Consultant, which names City and Applicant as an Additional Insured, and which is primary to any policy which the City may otherwise carry ("Primary Coverage"), and which treats the employees of the City and Applicant in the same manner as members of the general public ("Cross-liability Coverage"). Errors and Omissions insurance, in the amount set forth in Exhibit A, Paragraph 9, unless Errors and Omissions coverage is included in the General Liability policy. G. Proof of Insurance Coverage. (1) Certificates of Insurance. Consultant shall demonstrate proof of coverage herein required, prior to the commencement of services required under this Agreement, by delivery of Certificates of Insurance demonstrating same, and further indicating that the policies may not be canceled without at least thirty (30) days written notice to the Additional Insured. (2) Policy Endorsements Required. In order to demonstrate the Additional Insured Coverage, Primary Coverage and Cross-liability Coverage required under Consultant's Commercial General Liability Insurance Policy, Consultant shall deliver a policy endorsement to the City demonstrating same, which shall be reviewed and approved by the Risk Manager. H. Security for Performance. (1) Performance Bond. In the event that Exhibit A, at Paragraph 9, indicates the need for Consultant to provide a Performance Bond which indication shall be made by checking the parenthetical space adjacent to the term "Performance Bond", then Consultant shall provide to the City a performance bond by a surety and in a form satisfactory to the City Attorney in an amount indicated in the space adjacent to the term, "Performance Bond", in said Paragraph 9, Exhibit A. WPC 1':\HOMIN!NGINI!I!R.\DJ!SIGm2PlllYSTM.319 Page 3 &-/j I. Business License Consultant agrees to obtain a business license from the City and to otherwise comply with Title 5 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code. . 2. Duties of the City A. Consultation and Cooperation City shall regularly consult the Consultant for the purpose of reviewing the progress of the Defmed Services and Schedule therein contained, and to provide direction and guidance to achieve the objectives of this agreement. The City shall permit access to its office facilities, flies and records by Consultant throughout the term of the agreement. In addition thereto, City agrees to provide the information, data, items and materials set forth on Exhibit A, Paragraph 10, and with the further understanding that delay in the provision of these materials beyond 30 days after authorization to proceed, shall constitute a basis for the justifiable delay in the Consultant's performance of this agreement. B. Compensation Upon receipt of a properly prepared billing from Consultant submitted to the City periodically as indicated in Exhibit A, Paragraph 18, but in no event more frequently than monthly, on the day of the period indicated in Exhibit A, Paragraph 18, City shall compensate Consultant for all services rendered by Consultant according to the terms and conditions set forth in Exhibit A, Paragraph 11, adjacent to the governing compensation relationship indicated by a "check mark" next to the appropriate arrangement, and shall compensate Consultant for out of pocket expenses as provided in Exhibit A, Paragraph 12. All billings submitted by Consultant shall contain sufficient information as to the propriety of the billing to permit the City to evaluate that the amount due and payable thereunder is proper, and shall specifically contain the City's account number indicated on Exhibit A, Paragraph 18 (C) to be charged upon making such payment. 3. Administration of Contract Each party designates the individuals ("Contract Administrators") indicated on Exhibit A, Paragraph 13, as said party's contract administrator who is authorized by said party to represent them in the routine administration of this agreement. 4. Term. This Agreement shall terminate when the Parties have complied with all executory provisions hereof. WPC F:'HOMI!\I!NGlNl!ERIDI!.SIGN\2PIllYS1M.319 Page 4 ~""/2 5. Liquidated Damages The provisions of this section apply if a Liquidated Damages Rate is provided in Exhibit A, Paragraph 14. It is acknowledged by both parties that time is of the essence in the completion of this Agreement. It is difficult to estimate the amount of damages resulting from delay in per- formance. The parties have used their judgment to arrive at a reasonable amount to compensate for delay. Failure to complete the Defmed Services within the allotted time period specified in this Agreement shall result in the following penalty: For each consecutive calendar day in excess of the time specified for the completion of the respective work assignment or Deliverable, the consultant shall pay to the City, or have withheld from monies due, the sum of Liquidated Damages Rate provided in Exhibit A, Paragraph 14 ("Liquidated Damages Rate"). Time extensions for delays beyond the consultant's control, other than delays caused by the City, shall be requested in writing to the City's Contract AtlminiRtrator, or designee, prior to the expiration of the specified time. Extensions of time, when granted, will be based upon the effect of delays to the work and will not be granted for delays to minor portions of work unless it can be shown that such delays did or will delay the progress of the work. 6. Financial Interests of Consultant A. Consultant is Designated as an FPPC Filer. If Consultant is designated on Exhibit A, Paragraph 15, as an "FPPC filer", Consultant is deemed to be a "Consultant" for the purposes of the Political Reform Act conflict of interest and disclosure provisions, and shall report economic interests to the City Clerk on the required Statement of Economic Interests in such reporting categories as are specified in Paragraph 15 of Exhibit A, or if none are specified, then as determined by the City Attorney. B. Decline to Participate. Regardless of whether Consultant is designated as an FPPC Filer, Consultant shall not make, or participate in making or in any way attempt to use Consultant's position to influence a governmental decision in which Consultant knows or has reason to know Consultant has a fmancial interest other than the compensation promised by this Agreement. C. Search to Determine Economic Interests. Regardless of whether Consultant is designated as an FPPC Filer, Consultant warrants and represents that Consultant has diligently conducted a search and inventory of Consultant's economic interests, as the term is used in the regulations promulgated by the Fair Political Practices Commission, and has determined that Consultant does not, to the best of Consultant's knowledge, have an economic interest which would conflict with Consultant's duties under this agreement. Page 5 WPC F:\H0MEIIlNG1NEERIDBSIGN\2PIllYS1M.319 ~~/J D. Promise Not to Acquire Conflicting Interests. Regardless of whether Consultant is designated as an FPPC Filer, Consultant further warrants and represents that Consultant will not acquire, obtain, or assume an economic interest during the term of this Agreement which would constitute a conflict of interest as prohibited by the Fair Political Practices Act. E. Duty to Advise of Conflicting Interests. Regardless of whether Consultant is designated as an FPPC Filer, Consultant further warrants and represents that Consultant will immediately advise the City Attorney of City if Consultant learns of an economic interest of Consultant's which may result in a conflict of interest for the purpose of the Fair Political Practices Act, and regulations promulgated thereunder. F. Specific Warranties Against Economic Interests. Consultant warrants and represents that neither Consultant, nor Consultant's immediate family members, nor Consultant's employees or agents ("Consultant Associates") presently have any interest, directly or indirectly, whatsoever in any property which may be the subject matter of the Defmed Services, or in any property within 2 radial miles from the exterior boundaries of any property which may be the subject matter of the Defmed Services, ("Prohibited Interest"), other than as listed in Exhibit A, Paragraph 15. Consultant further warrants and represents that no promise of future employment, remuneration, consideration, gratuity or other reward or gain has been made to Consultant or Consultant Associates in connection with Consultant's performance of this Agreement. Consultant promises to advise City of any such promise that may be made during the Term of this Agreement, or for 12 months thereafter. Consultant agrees that Consultant Associates shall not acquire any such Prohibited Interest within the Term of this Agreement, or for 12 months after the expiration of this Agreement, except with the written permission of City. Consultant may not conduct or solicit any business for any party to this Agreement, or for any third party which may be in conflict with Consultant's responsibilities under this Agreement, except with the written permission of City. 7. Hold Harmless Consultant shall defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, its elected and appointed officers and employees, from and against all claims for damages, liability, cost and expense (including without limitation attorneys' fees) arising out of the negligent conduct of the Consultant, or any agent or employee, subcontractors, or others in connection with the execution of the work covered by this Agreement, except only for those claims arising from the sole negligence or sole willful conduct of the City, its officers, or employees. Consultant's indemnification shall include any and all costs, expenses, attorneys' fees and liability incurred by the City, its officers, agents, or employees in defending against such claims, whether the Page 6 WPC F:IHOMEI1!NGINI!ERIDBSlGNI2P1lTYS1M.319 ~-Jf same proceed to judgment or not. Further, Consultant at its own expense shall, upon written request by the City, defend any such suit or action brought against the City, its officers, agents, or employees. Consultants' indemnification of City shall not be limited by any prior or subsequent declaration by the Consultant. 8. Termination of Agreement for Cause If, through any cause, Consultant shall fail to fulfill in a timely and proper manner Consultant's obligations under this Agreement, or if Consultant shall violate any of the covenants, agreements or stipulations of this Agreement, City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof at least five (5) days before the effective date of such termination. In that event, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, reports and other materials prepared by Consultant shall, at the option of the City, become the property of the City, and Consultant shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed on such documents and other materials up to the effective date of Notice of Termination, not to exceed the amounts payable hereunder, and less any damages caused City by Consultant's breach. 9. Errors and Omissions In the event that the City Administrator determines that the Consultants' negligence, errors, or omissions in the performance of work under this Agreement has resulted in expense to City greater than would have resulted if there were no such negligence, errors, omissions, Consultant shall reimburse City for any additional expenses incurred by the City. Nothing herein is intended to limit City's rights under other provisions of this agreement. 10. Termination of Agreement for Convenience of City "'-.. City may terminate this Agreement at any time and for any reason, by giving specific written notice to Consultant of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof, at least thirty (30) days before the effective date of such termination. In that event, all finished and unfinished documents and other materials described hereinabove shall, at the option of the City, become City's sole and exclusive property. If the Agreement is terminated by City as provided in this paragraph, Consultant shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any satisfactory work completed on such documents and other materials to the effective date of such termination. Consultant hereby expressly waives any and all claims for damages or compensation arising under this Agreement except as set forth herein. 11. Assignability The services of Consultant are personal to the City, and Consultant shall not assign any interest in this Agreement, and shall not transfer any interest in the same (whether by assignment or novation), without prior written consent of City, which City may not unreasonably deny. City hereby consents to the assignment of the portions of the Defmed Services identified in Exhibit A, Paragraph 17 to the sub consultants identified thereat as "Permitted Subconsultants". Page 7 WPC F:\HOMEIENGINI!ER\DESIGN\2PIlTYS'lM.319 ,t---J5 12. Ownership, Publication, Reproduction and Use of Material All reports, studies, information, data, statistics, forms, designs, plans, procedures, systems and any other materials or properties produced under this Agreement shall be the sole and exclusive property of City. No such materials or properties produced in whole or in part under this Agreement shall be subject to private use, copyrights or patent rights by Consultant in the United States or in any other country without the express written consent of City. City shall have unrestricted authority to publish, disclose (except as may be limited by the provisions of the Public Records Act), distribute, and otherwise use, copyright or patent, in whole or in part, any such reports, studies, data, statistics, forms or other materials or properties produced under this Agreement. 13. Independent Contractor City is interested only in the results obtained and Consultant shall perform as an independent contractor with sole control of the manner and means of performing the services required under this Agreement. City maintains the right only to reject or accept Consultant's work products. Consultant and any of the Consultant's agents, employees or representatives are, for all purposes under this Agreement, an independent contractor and shall not be deemed to be an employee of City, and none of them shall be entitled to any benefits to which City employees are entitled including but not limited to, overtime, retirement benefits, worker's compensation benefits, injury leave or other leave benefits. 14. Administrative Claims Requirements and Procedures No suit or arbitration shall be brought arising out of this agreement, against the City unless a claim has first been presented in writing and filed with the City and acted upon by the City in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 1.34 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, as same may from time to time be amended, the provisions of which are incorporated by this reference as if fully set forth herein, and such policies and procedures used by the City in the implementation of same. Upon request by City, Consultant shall meet and confer in good faith with City for the purpose of resolving any dispute over the terms of this Agreement. 15. Attorney's Fees Should a dispute arising out of this Agreement result in litigation, it is agreed that the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover all reasonable costs incurred in the defense of the claim, including costs and attorney's fees. 16. Statement of Costs In the event that Consultant prepares a report or document, or participates in the preparation of a report or document in performing the Defmed Services, Consultant shall include, or cause the inclusion of, in said report or document, a statement of the numbers and cost in dollar amounts of all contracts and subcontracts relating to the preparation of the report or document. WPC F:IHOMI!\I!NGINI!IlIl\DESIGNl2PRlYSTM.319 Page 8 ~ - Ii- 17. Miscellaneous A. Consultant not authorized to Represent City Unless specifically authorized in writing by City, Consultant shall have no authority to act as City's agent to bind City to any contractual agreements whatsoever. B. Consultant is Real Estate Broker and/or Salesman If the box on Exhibit A, Paragraph 16 is marked, the Consultant and/or their principals is/are licensed with the State of California or some other state as a licensed real estate broker or salesperson. Otherwise, Consultant represents that neither Consultant, nor their principals are licensed real estate brokers or salespersons. C. Notices AU notices, demands or requests provided for or permitted to be given pursuant to this Agreement must be in writing. All notices, demands and requests to be sent to any party shall be deemed to have been properly given or served if personally served or deposited in the United States mail, addressed to such party, postage prepaid, registered or certified, with return receipt requested, at the addresses identified herein as the places of business for each of the designated parties. D. Entire Agreement This Agreement, together with any other written document referred to or contemplated herein, embody the entire Agreement and understanding between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. Neither this Agreement nor any provision hereof may be amended, modified, waived or discharged except by an instrument in writing executed by the party against which enforcement of such amendment, waiver or discharge is sought. E. Capacity of Parties Each signatory and party hereto hereby warrants and represents to the other party that it has legal authority and capacity and direction from its principal to enter into this Agreement, and that all resolutions or other actions have been taken so as to enable it to enter into this Agreement. F. Governing LawNenue This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Any action arising under or relating to this Agreement shall be brought only in the federal or state courts located in San Diego County, State of California, and if applicable, the City of Chula Vista, or as close thereto as possible. Venue for this Agreement, and performance hereunder, shall be the City of Chula VISta. [end of page. next page is signature page.] Page 9 WPC F:\HOMElENllINEERIDBSIGNl2PR.1YS1M.319 j-J7 Signature Page to Agreement between City of Chula Vista and McDaniel Engineering Company, Inc. for Bridge Construction Consulting Services for the Otay Valley River Bridge Crossing in the City of Chula Vista IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Consultant have executed this Agreement thereby indicating that they have read and understood same, and indicate their full and complete consent to its terms: Dated: City of Chula Vista Attest: by: W tJp--, J~Goss, City Manager Beverly Authelet, City Clerk 1 Attorney Dated: McDaniel Engineering Company, Inc. By: .h/ /??....A ~., -:? w. Mark Ashley, President By: Exhibit List to Agreement ( x) Exhibit A.I ( ) Exhibit B: WPC F:1H0M1NlNGINE1!R1DESlGN\2P1llYSTM.319 t~/~ Page 10 Exhibit A to Agreement between City of Chula Vista and McDaniel Engineering Company, Ine. 1. Effective Date of Agreement: April 3, 1995 2. City-Related Entity: ( X) City of Chula Vista, a municipal chartered corporation of the State of California () Redevelopment Agency of the City of Chula Vista, a political subdivision of the State of California () Industrial Development Authority of the City of Chula Vista, a () Other: ("City") ,a [insert business form] 3. Place of Business for City: City of Chula Vista, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910 4. Consultant: McDaniel Engineering Company, Inc. 5. Business Form of Consultant: () Sole Proprietorship ( ) Partnership ( x ) Corporation 6. Place of Business, Telephone and Fax Number of Consultant: 5030 Camino De La Siesta, Suite 204 San Diego, CA 92108 Voice Phone (619) 692-1920 Fax Phone (619) 692-0634 WPC F:IHOMIN!NGJNI!Ell.\DESIGNI1!XIIIASTM.319 ~~/r Page 1 -') . 7. General Duties: Consultant shall provide construction engineering services for the widening of a bridge across the Otay River at a point where Otay Valley Road crosses said river as shown on Chula Vista Drawings 94-68 thru 94-78. These services include providing contract lid ministration and construction inspection services exclusively for the Otay Valley Road Bridge Widening. The City is widening the existing bridge which is 82' long X 28' wide over the Otay Valley River. The existing bridge is a two-span, steel girder with timber decking. It is supported by steel pile abutments and bents. The existing metal rail will be reused on the widening. 8. Scope of Work and Schedule: A. Detailed Scope of Work: Throughout the construction period for the bridge, the Bridge Representative provided by the Consultant shall monitor the operations of the Bridge Contractor and Subcontractors for compliance with contract documents and provide contract administration for the bridge as required. Such services shall include the following activities. 1. Monitoring of Construction Operations for Contract Compliance a) Pile extensions b) Structural steel erection c) Timber installation d) Barrier rail and hand railing inspection e) Completion punch list 2. Contract Administration a) Prepare daily diaries on construction operations b) Monitor the construction schedule c) Review contractor submitta1s d) Check welders' certifications e) Materials compliance t) Respond to Contractor inquiries g) Compile monthly estimates and determine Contractor progress payments h) Prepare contract change orders i) Scheduling/coordination for surveying j) Scheduling/coordination for materials testing k) Furnish set of . AI, Built Plans. on Mylar upon the completion of the project WPC F:\II0ME\ENGINEJ!R\DIlSlGNII!XIIIAS1M.319 Page 2 ~~e20 3. General The Bridge Representative shall be present at the project site on a part-time basis as necessary to provide a satisfactory level of monitoring of the work. B. Date for Commencement of Consultant Services: ( x ) Same as Effective Date of Agreement () Other: C. Dates or Time Limits for Delivery of Deliverables: Deliverables are ongoing throughout the construction of the Otay River Bridge crossing . D. Date for completion of all Consultant services: Upon acceptance of the project by the City Council for the construction of "The Improvement of Assessment District No. 90-2 (Otay Valley Road Phases II & Ill) from 1200 Feet East of Nirvana Avenue to the Northerly Limits of Otay Rio Subdivision in the City of Chula Vista. CA (ST -123)" . 9. Insurance Requirements: (x) Statutory Worker's Compensation lnsurance ( x ) Employer's Liability lnsurance coverage: $1,000,000. ( x ) Commercial General Liability lnsurance: $1,000,000. ( ) Errors and Omissions insurance: None Required (included in Commercial General Liability coverage). ( x ) Errors and Omissions lnsurance: $250,000 (not included in Commercial General Liability coverage). 10. Materials and Services Required to be Supplied by City to Consultant: A. Surveying 1. Staking of roadway centerline and bridge edge of deck lines 2. Establishing temporary bench marks B. Materials Testing 1. Structure backfill tests, including: a. Aggregate Compliance b. Compaction WPC F:'HOMIl\I!NGINEEIlIDESIGNIIOOIL\S'lld.319 ~..-~/ Page 3 2. Testing of full penn welds where required 3. Asphalt concrete C. Trqlfic Staging 11. Compensation: A ( ) Single Fixed Fee Arrangement. For performance of all of the Defined Services by Consultant as herein required, City shall pay a single fixed fee in the amounts and at the times or milestones or for the Deliverab1es set forth below: B ( ) Phased Fixed Fee Arrangement. For the performance of each phase or portion of the Defined Services by Consultant as are separately identified below, City shall pay the fixed fee associated with each phase of Services, in the amounts and at the times or milestones or Deliverables set forth. Consultant shall not commence Services under any Phase, and shall not be entitled to the compensation for a Phase, unless City shall have issued a notice to proceed to Consultant as to said Phase. Phase Fee for Said Phase 1. $ 2. $ 3. $ C ( X ) Hourly Rate Arrangement For performance of the Defmed Services by Consultant as herein required, City shal1 pay Consultant for the productive hours of time spent by Consultant in the performance of said Services, at the rates or amounts set forth in the Rate Schedule hereinbelow according to the fol1owing terms and conditions: (1) () Not-to-Exceed Limitation on Time and Materials Arrangement Notwithstanding the expenditure by Consultant of time and materials in excess of said Maximum Compensation amount, Consultant agrees that Consultant wil1 perform all of the Defmed Services herein required of Consultant for $ including all Materials, and other "reimbursable" ("Maximum Compensation"). (2) ( X) Limitation without Further Authorization on Time and Materials Arrangement WPC F:\HOME'ENGlNEERIDESlGN\EXIIIAS1M.319 ~-.).:L Page 4 At such time as Consultant shall have incurred time and materials equal to $15.000.00 ("Authorization Limit"), Consultant shall not be entitled to any additional compensation without further authorization issued in writing and approved by the City. Nothing herein shall preclude Consultant from providing additional Services at Consultant's own cost and expense. Hourly time billed to include travel time from office to the job site and back. Rate Schedule Cateeory of Employee of Consultant Name Hourly Rate PRINCIPAL BRIDGE ENGINEER W. MARK ASHLEY $110.00 BRIDGE DESIGN ENGINEER PERRY SCHACHT 90.00 BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION ENGINEER REV NOCON 80.00 BRIDGE CONSTRUCTION TECHNICIAN 50.00 OFFICE CLERICAL STAFF 40.00 ( ) Hourly rates may increase by 6% for services rendered after {month}, 19 delay in providing services is caused by City. if , 12. Materials Reimbursement Arrangement For the cost of out of pocket expenses incurred by Consultant in the performance of services herein required, City shall pay Consultant at the rates or amounts set forth below: ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) () None, the compensation includes all costs. Cost or Rate Reports, not to exceed $_: Copies, not to exceed $_: Travel, not to exceed $_: Printing, not to exceed $_: Postage, not to exceed $_: Delivery, not to exceed $_: Long Distance Telephone Charges, not to exceed $ Other Actual Identifiable Direct Costs: . not to exceed $ . not to exceed $ Page 5 WPC F:'H0MI!IEN0INEER1DESIGN\EXHIASlM.319 d-2J 13. Contract Administrators: City: City of Chula Vista Dennis Davies, Civil Engineer Consultant: McDaniel Engineering Company, Inc. Mark Ashley, President 14. Liquidated Damages Rate: ( x) $0 per day. ( ) Other: 15. Statement of Economic Interests, Consultant Reporting Categories, per Conflict of Interest Code: ( x) Not Applicable. Not an FPPC Filer. ( ) FPPC Filer () Category No. 1. Investments and sources of income. () Category No.2. Interests in real property. () Category No.3. Investments, interest in real property and sources of income subject to the regulatory, permit or licensing authority of the department. () Category No.4. Investments in business entities and sources of income which engage in land development, construction or the acquisition or sale of real property. () Category No.5. Investments in business entities and sources of income of the type which, within the past two years, have contracted with the City of Chula Vista (Redevelopment Agency) to provide services, supplies, materials, machinery or equipment. () Category No.6. Investments in business entities and sources of income of the type which, within the past two years, have contracted with the designated employee's department to provide services, supplies, materials, machinery or equipment. () Category No.7. Business positions. Wl'C F:\HOMElENGINI!EllIDESIGN\IlXIIIASThl.319 t '-2,/ Page 6 ( ) List "Consultant Associates" interests in real property within 2 radial miles of Project Property, if any: 16. () Consultant is Real Estate Broker and/or Salesman 17. Permitted Subconsultants: None 18. Bill Processing: A. Consultant's Billing to be submitted for the following period of time: ( X) Monthly ( ) Quarterly ( ) Other: After reaching each milestone B. Day of the Period for submission of Consultant's Billing: ( X) First of the Month ( ) 15th Day of each Month ( ) End of the Month ( ) Other: 15th day after each milestone C. City's Account Number: 603-6030-STM 319 WPC F:IHOMEIENGINEI!IlIDBSlGN\1OOIIASlM.319 ~-~ Page 7 ff "Trl1C H fv1~N r it c- [ I ~~ . , l..""-" . .-' ~4> COUNCn.. AGENDA STATEMENT . Item II) Meeting Date: 10/19/93 ITEM TITLE: Resolution: J ?.:l , ~ Approving agreement between the County of San Diego and the City of Chula Vista for the construction of a bridge over the Otay River Oil Otay Valley Road and authorizing the Mayor to execute on behalf of thi: City. Director of Public works# City ManagerJf-> ~ ~ q u -" (4/S:hs Vote: Yes_ No_2U SUBMU .l~D BY: REVIEWED BY: '. The City is currently involved in the planning and construction activities to widen Otay Valley Road in the segment between I-80S freeway and the easterly City limits southerly to Otay Rio subdivision. Phase I of the project goes from I-80S freeway to approximately 1200 feet east of Nirvana Avenue. Phase 2 goes from 1200 feet east of Nirvana Avenue to the easterly City limits southerly to Otay Rio subdivision. A portion of Otay Valley Road crossing Otay River was washed out in January 1993. This agreement outlines the City's and County's responsibility in constructing a bridge. Construction for Phase 1 of the project has t>een awarded to Granite Construction Company and the contract has been executed by the City and construction is anticipated to start in November of this year. Design work for Phase 2 is nearly completed and is awaiting the f1Jla1 design of the bridge over Otay River on Otay Valley Road. The construction of the bridge was budgeted in the CIP as phase 3 of the Otay Valley Road project, but will be constructed as an integral part of phase 2. RECOMMENDATION: That Council approve the agreement between the County of San Diego and the City of Chula Vista for the construction of a bridge over the Otay River on Otay Valley Road and authorize the Mayor to execute on behalf of the City. BOARD/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not applicable. DISCUSSION: The County of San Diego and the City of Chula Vista desire to cooperate and jointly participate in the design and construction of a bridge over Otay River on Otay Valley Road that is partially within the County and partially within the City. The Otay Valley Road is an important transportation link for both the County and the City. A portion of this link was washed out . during the rains of January 1993 where the road crosses Otay River. The County has obtained 16'l~~--oZ? Page...1..- Item ..L1L " Meeting Date: 10/19/93 approval from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to fund the design and construction of the bridge to r~place the drainage facilities that were washed out. FEMA has agreed to fund the construction of a 28 foot wide by 80 foot long bridge across the Otay River. Under FEMA regulations the project to be constructed can only include the minimal work to replace the washed out facilities. FEMA's regulations further prohibit a local agency from adding their own funds to a FEMA project and constructing a project that .betters. what was in place before the storm damage. Staff spent considerable time working at both the local and regional levels to get FEMA to change this policy to one that would allow an more cost effective overall approach. All our efforts were unsuccessful. The City, however, is desirous of widening this bridge to accommodate three travel lanes plus bicycle paths as part of our phase 3 project. Since we cannot add our funding to the County's project, which would be the most cost effective approach, we must wait for the completion of the County's construction and inspection by FEMA before widening the bridge. In order to minimize the loss due to this type of phased construction, close coordination on the part of the City and County staffs is required. The County also desires to get the bridge replaced as soon as possible in order ~ open the road. Because environmental constraints would have required l an inordinate amount of time to do an EIR and get the necessary permits from Federal and State agency's, the County determined that they needed to construct the road in the exact location of the washout. Construction in that location would not require the same level of State and Federal permits and could be completed sooner. However, that construction would necessitate our removing their bridge and constructing a completely new, wider bridge. Therefore, City and County staffs worked together to utilize the environmental work the City has done to allow the County to construct the bridge in the location desired by the City under the City's permits. Since the City is required to do the same, or higher level, of environmental mitigation as part of our project, City staff agreed to be responsible for the mitigation work for the County's project. The proposed bridge is the most cost effective method of restoration of service and expansion to provide needed additional capacity. In order to aSsure the road would never wash out again, a considerably larger bridge, at a cost beyond the City's funding ability, would need to be built. Part of the information taken into consideration in this decision was that the ultimate alignment of this section of the road will probably change when the Otay Ranch develops in the adjacent areas. A permanent bridge built in this location could possibly be abandoned at that time. Work is being included in the construction plans that would protect the bridge and make restoration of service possible within a quicker time frame. In consideration of these concerns, this agreement calls for the City and County to agree that the bridge construction and replacement shall consist of: 11 ~ r::.-..2c/ I~ I. I. . Page-3- Item J () Meeting Date: 10/19/93 1. Addressing and obtaining all mitigation and relevant permits including habitat enhancement required by the appropriate resource agencies for the bridge construction. County construction of a bridge (phase 1) 28 feet wide by 80 feet long supported by FEMA funds. City widening as parlOf our phase 2 Otay Valley Road project the County's constructed bridge. The City's widening is to be from 28 feet wide. to 52 feet wide (12 feet each side). Specifically it is mutually agreed by both the City and the County to the following: 2. 3. .1.. County Re$oonsibilitv With the use of FEMA funds and upon issuance of a Fish and Game Permit, the County will be responsible for Phase 1 of the project which will consist of constructing an 80 foot long by 28 foot wide bridge beginning with the north abutment at station 103+ 10. The bridge approach road will conform to County standards for that portion in the County and to City standards for that portion in the City. County's contractor will be responsible for Phase 1 of the bridge construction. The City and County must approve each others plans which assures consistency in the rmal bridge. ~ City's Re$ponsibiJitv The City will act as the lead agency and be responsible for Phase 2 widening of the project which will consist of constructing a bridge widening from 28 feet to 52 feet and 80 feet long. The bridge approach will conform to City standards for the that portion in the City and to County standards for that portion in the County. The City will also be responsible for rmancial support, addressing and obm1ni"i all mitigation and relevant permits including habitat enhancement required by appropriate resource agencies for the bridge construction. The City's contractor will be responsible for construction of Phase 2 bridge widening in conform"n~ with the requirements identified by the resources agencies. The City's responsibility is to construct Phase 2 improvements is conditioned upon prior completion by the County of the Phase 1 improvements. 3. Both the City and County provide for indemnification of each others officers and employees associated with work with this agreement. ~ ~-,z/ Page~ Item I/) Meeting Date: 10/19/93 "')' 4. The agreement shall terminate upon completion of the project and payment of all amounts due under the terms of the agreement. S. The parties agree to name each other as additionally insured on all insurance policies obtained within respect to Phase 1 or Phase 2 improvements. Attached is a complete copy of the agreement. FEMA's regulations, which require the County to construct the fITSt phase of the bridge to a limited capacity and the City to follow up with a separate contract to widen the bridge, are not conducive to the most cost effective approach for local agencies that wish to add funding to construct a more useful project. In these days of fIScal belt tightening this type of regulation requires local agencies to waste funds in doing, or redoing certain work that could be done more effectively as one contract. Therefore, it is also recommended that the Mayor be instructed to send a letter to the President, Vice President, our local congressmen, and U.S. Senators advising them that these policies are causing local agencies to spend more money than a policy calling for a coordinated approach would require. FISCAL IMPACT: The City costs associated with this agreement are being funded with budgeted project Otay Valley Road, Phase 11I (STM-319) funds which were appropriated in the 1993-94 budget. Attached is a copy of the page of the CIP budget outlining this project. The City will be paying all environmental impact mitigation costs as part of the City's project. The County will bear all costs for the construction of their project, except for environmental mitigation measures, from their FEMA grant. ' , ,"""" ~C:--JiJ HJ4f ~~( v ~:; !l~s:a soj \.. ~ \ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ,- ,\ \- .-".. ~ .u- &JIiIf- " I mj-r-. \ - _I.-n -.., :j I -II I " I :1 ' ... i "0 ~, {iJ t Jr \- ~'l:l: , rt"""'" I. ~ \ ~ ~-------_. t:: ____.. J ~--- I :- ~.~ : : . ~ I! ~~ i I- l- t ~~ 1/- ~L- 1/['-:1... ~ I} LJ III L- l~ P I~ : , I I:t. I I 10.. ! ( ~ ~ ... \ ---1 I (e ..J en:' ',- - \ .1 . , 1'\\ \'4 ;:!, t i .- _ ... J~ oGl - \ F,f .-~ ,\ ~,.......\:... \ :" ~, -l-: . '..r)\ . .' ~ 1lI :1~ ...... "'- E~""" -= 7 . i.\. " .' I \ \~ . '\ , \ I \ ' , ' , .. ~ I[ :F , = n- . ;1t .: .... I -~. ~ ~ ~ " , ...., - . . - . ;;\\-- . , .' . ' .10...... ~ , ~\ \ -""~ . .,,~ \ III !\ i \ ' . I V ,..,' ; Ci.....:!, .... ...,.......,.,.- ", ~ ,~':.J, "c' '.' ,-, .... ! ~ ~~ :~ 0 ~\ ~\ \'< '~~:, . :.,.... " :~~}i' ,';.yr ~r-:>?~~ ~ \,,~~ "~~~u)...,o\!l ,~~tl. ~ ",,4',':- &-3/ ~ 1- , i;- . . j , a . a I .. t a a J ... t a a ; ... III t a a J ... ~ I t ! lB. I 0 I I. I I I I I . ~ &l &l .. ... .. ... i 11I1 .. .. .. ... t i; . Ii a a fi I . . ilfi~ I cl oJ I I I. i I 0 I I I Ii I s a II II 1! ~ .. .. .. .. .. .. ','..'7. , ~~F" ~:"" . i i j I II Id f 1 t I I I I ~ I f J. i~1 I ] I I i ... . Ii Ii . ""'" . 1 .Ii t I f J I t } It It Ii ffHI J J. .. t 86 t I! {Ill Ij ,I I IUft i l . . I . I. , . i,-l (;--);2 I ~ . j~ I e Ie Ie RESOLUTION NO. /7;2. ?~ RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO AND THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF A BRIDGE OVER THE OTAY RIVER ON OTAY VALLEY ROAD AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE ON BEHALF OF THE CITY WHEREAS, the City is currently involved in the planning and construction acti vi ties to widen Otay Valley Road in the segment between .I-80S freeway and the easterly City limits southerly to Otay Rio subdivision; and WHEREAS, Phase 1 of the project goes from I-80S freeway to approximately 1200 teet east of Nirvana Avenue and Phase 2 goes from 1200 feet east of Nirvana Avenue to the easterly city limits southerly to Otay Rio subdivision; and WHEREAS, a portion of Otay Valley Road crossing Otay River WaS washed out in January 1993; and WHEREAS, this agreement outlines the City's and County's responsibility in constructing a bridge; and WHEREAS, construction for Phase 1 of the project has been awarded to Granite Construction company and the contract has been executed by the city and construction is anticipated to start in November of this year. Design work for Phase 2 is nearly completed and is awaiting the final design of the bridge over Otay River on Otay Valley Road. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City council of the City of Chula Vista does hereby approve an Agreement between the County of San Diego and the city of Chula Vista for the construction of a bridge over .the Otay River on Otay Valley Road, a copy of which is on file in the office of the city Clerk. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the city of Chula Vista is hereby au~horized and directed 0 execute said Agreement on behalf of the City of Chu Vista. Presented by John P. Lippitt, Director of Public Works P:_la_looa)'brid &~3} .. . , ~..~. ". Q ~E:r.'/E: '..!i y 0' :-.:':"':L!. V;:';!:. "'"___2 FAX Cl1~ ..0&8' LOCATION CllIlE ... DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS ~t~;:!~.;: =':1:I.~ ::Et'T ~t. ~g.;~ SEP 3 t P&'!4h~2"GI...m "'"" ~ U COUNT V AIJlilPORTS COUNT., "OAD COMMISSIONER T"A~SPO"TATION OPERATIONS COUNTY SUAVE VOR 'LOOD CONTJIiIOL LIQUID WASTE aOLlD WASTE QIOUlttg of ~nlt .... OW.........O AVE. ...... O.EOO, CALI'Oll...A .2123,1211 October 1, 1993 Mr. Cliff SWanson Deputy Director/city Engineer Department of Public Worka City of Cbula Vista 276 4th Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 fl' ~~ .... ~ - , - ~ " -. ., ~ ,", Dear Mr. Swanson: :i!' ~ ::a :; i '. If I:.: : ~-l ' . :,. '" t. :..:,. :~. e., .. ... '. ' r:'.- t,' ... .. ~ ;.'~ .; ... ,. Subject: Revise4 Agreement .et.een the County of .an Diego an4 ~he City of Cbula Vista for the Construetion of a Bri4qe over ~he Otay River on otay Valley Roa4 We bave reviewed and incorporated the City of Cbula Vista's proposed amencSmenta to the above subject agreement which is submitted to you for further action. The revised agreement has ~ been reviewed and approved by our County Counsel. Any additional amencSments to the agreement will need ~o be discussed and agreed to by our County Counsel (Bill Smith at 531- 4895) . Please inform ua as to the date that the agreement will be heard by your City Council. Upon approval by your City Council, we will forward the approved agreement to the Board of Supervisors for their approval. If you have any questions, please contact Bill Hoeben at 495- 5287. Very truly yours, ~ r ROGER F. WALSH -it> r Acting Director RFW:WAH:res Attachment cc: Lari Sheehan (A6) Bill Smith (A12) Bill Hoeben (0340) """\ ~ &:---Jr . '. . AGREBKJDl'T BB'l'WEEN 'l'BE COUllTY OJ' SU DIEGO .urD 'l'BB CITY OJ' CJltJU VISTA J'OR 'l'BE CONSTRUCTION OJ' A BRIDGE OVER 'l'BE OTAY RIVER ON OTAY VALLBY ROAD WITNESSETH WHEREAS, COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO (COUNTY) and the CITY OF CHULA VISTA (CITY) desire to cooperate and jointly participate in the design and construction of a bridge over the Otay River on Otay Valley Road that is partially wi thin the COUNTY and partially within the CITY; and WHEREAS, the drainage culverts on Otay Valley Road over the Otay River were washed out by the rains of January 1993; and WHEREAS, Otay Valley Road is an important transportation link for both the COUNTY and the CITY; and WHEREAS, the COUNTY has obtained approval from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) to support the design and construction of a bridge to replace the drainage facilities washed out by the January 1993 rains; and WHEREAS, the COUNTY and the CITY have determined to construct a bridge over the Otay River on Otay Valley Road; and WHEREAS, COUNTY and CITY agree that the bridge construction and replacement shall consist of: 1. Addressing and obtaining all mitigation and relevant permits including habitat enhancement required by the appropriate resource agencies for the bridge construction. 2. COUNTY construction of a bridge (Phase I), 28 feet wide by 80 feet long, supported by Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) funds. Said bridge having its north abutment at station 103+10. 3. CITY constructing a widening (Phase II), to the COUNTY constructed bridge. The CITY widening ia to be from 28 feet wide to 52 feet wide (12 feet each aide). Said widening to be located such that the north abutment begins at station 103+10. WHEREAS, the bridge over the Otay River on Otay Valley Road hereinafter referred to as "PROJECT", will benefit residents of the COUNTY and CITY; and ~~-;J5 \ WHEREAS, COUNTY and CITY are each empowered to enter into such .""", public works project; and WHEREAS, COUNTY and CITY are authorized by Government Code sections 6500 et. seg., to enter into a joint powers agreement to exercise powers jointly held; and WHEREAS, COUNTY and CITY desire to specify herein the terms and conditions by which the design and construction of said PROJECT shall be accomplished and financed. NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed to by and between the COUNTY and CITY as follows: 1. COUNTY RESPONSIBILITIES. With the use of FEMA funds, and upon issuance of the Fish and Game permit, the COUNTY will be responsible for Phase I of the PROJECT which will consist of constructing a bridge 80 feet long by 28 feet wide beginning with the north abutment at station 103+10. The bridge approach road will conform to County Standards for that portion in the COUNTY and City Standards for that portion in the CITY. The COUNTY contractor will be responsible for construction of the Phase I bridge construction in conformance with the requirements identified by the resource agencies. COUNTY agrees to use it.s reasonable best efforts to obtain the FEMA funds necessary to complete the Phase I improvements. 1 2. CITY RESPONSIBILITIES. The CITY will act as lead agency and be responsible for the Phase II widening of the PROJECT which will consist of constructing a bridge widening from 28 feet to 52 feet, 80 feet long, with the north abutment beginning at station 103+10. The CITY will ensure the width of the bridge will have a 52 foot width. The bridge approach road will conform to City Standards for that portion in the CITY and County Standards for that portion in the COUNTY. The CITY will also be responsible for financial support, addressing, and obtaining all mitigation and relevant permits including habitat enhancement required by the appropriate resource agencies for the bridge construction. The CITY contractor will be responsible for construction of the Phase II bridge widening in conformance with the requirements identified by the resource agencies. CITY's responsibilities to construct Phase II improvements is conditioned upon the prior completion by the COUNTY of the Phase I improvements. 3. DESYGN AND CONSTRUCTiON OF BRiDGE. Both CITY shall review the design work on the bridge agency's acceptance of the construction work jurisdiction. 4 (a). INDEMNIFICATION BY THE COUNTY. COUNTY shall indemnify, defend and save CITY and CITY's agents, officers and employees harmless from and against any and all active and passive ~ liability, claims, suits, actions, damages, and/or causes of action ' arising out of any personal injury, bodily injury, loss of life or the COUNTY and and seek each within their ~~-J~ '. (e e damage to property, violation of any federal, state or municipal law or ordinance, or other cause in connection with any activities under this Agreement of COUNTY, COUNTY's employees or agents, or on account of the performance or character of the work, unforeseen difficulties, accidents, occurrences, or other causes, and from and against all costs, counsel fees , expenses incurred in Obtaining expert testimony and the attendance of witnesses, expenses and liabilities incurred in and about any such claim, the investigation thereof, or the defense of any action or proceeding brought thereon, and from and against orders, judgments, or decrees which may be entered therein. 4 (b). INDEMNIFICATION BY THE CITY. CITY shall indemnify, defend and save COUNTY and COUNTY's agents, officers and employees harmless from and against any and all active and passive liability, claims, suits, actions, damages, and/or causes of action arising out of any personal injury, bodily injury, loss of life or damage to property, violation of any federal, state or municipal law or ordinance, or other cause in connection with any activities under this Agreement of CITY, CITY's employees or agents, or on account of the performance or character of the work, unforeseen difficulties, accidents, occurrences, or other causes, and from and against all costs, counsel fees, expenses incurred in obtaining expert testimony and the attendance of witnesses, expenses and liabilities incurred in and about any such claim, the investigation thereof, or the defense of any action or proceeding brought thereon, and from and against orders, judgments, or decrees which may be entered therein. 4 (c). These indemnity provisions are not limited in any way by the extent of any policy of insurance currently in force and held by either party. 5. This Agreement may not be modified, amended or otherwise changed unless by an amendment in writing and executed by the parties. 6. This Agreement shall terminate after completion of the PROJECT and payment of all amounts due under the terms of this Agreement. Notwithstanding the foregoing, each parties indemnity obligations hereunder shall survive the termination of this Agreement. 7. The parties agree to name each other as additional insureds on all insurance policies obtained with respect to the Phase I and Phase II improvements. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this Agreement i. executed by the County of San Diego pursuant to action taken by the Board of supervisors and the City of Chula Vista pursuant to action taken by its city Council. ~ i-J? CITY OF CHULA VISTA BY: Mayor of the City of Chula Vista ATTEST Clerk DATE: CLAVISTA rev. 9/30/93 u..( 1 COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO BY: Clerk of the Board of Supervisors APPROVED AS TO FORM BY: County Counsel , 1 ~ &--3r ~v~ iIIf ~(;I1YOF WlUlA VISTA I "'ICHASIOC.ocIIIT -II' WTTAet-//'I/ii:N l' D AU-~-U ..:.J./;1 ( REQUISITION I__MO~":"-';' a I( CJ STORES, ag PURCHASING . E-1l3 . "-WlIUlHISM'TlU_AIlDllIlNBTII THI~D~'~~~'TII"DOIIL' Engineering _ Design ~CUWNTiUIICii:',_OI. 1l$Al(-.l1N 276 Fourth Avenue Chula Vista, CA ON9ol~. ~-I-?J !WI \ R~~ JJBifR B~H>' ~~ . UNIT DESCRlP'TlON PRICE AMOUNT Provide brido:e desio:n consultino: services for Otav River Bridoe Crossino. A co"v of the annroved aoreement is attached. Also attached is co"v of Citv Manaoer's authorization me~o. Sinde FlY Fee $20.932.00 Material Reimbursement 300.00 TOTAL $21.232.00 Fundino: source: Otav Vallev Road - Phase III 603-6030-STM3 9 VENDOR: McDaniel EnRineerinR Comnanv. Inc 5030 Camino De La Siesta. Ste.204 San DieRo. CA 92108 . I AOIllINISTLC'IOI'I_.__1I' 1--11' \--- I FILLED IT 15ii lICIMD IIICIIVID II' I NICIIl__ IPUlC*SI-- l_aSlllllD_1Il1 _UK ONLY ".102111\1 711" t -- J; )11 JIG MEMORANDUM November 22, 1993 File # AD-OS? TO: FROM: John Goss, City Manager ..J / John P. Lippitt, Director of Public worit'V Approval of Agreement between the City of Chula Vista and McDaniel Engineering Company, Inc., for bridge design consulting services for Otay River Bridge Crossing SUBJECT: We have been working with the County of San Diego to rebuild the Otay Valley Road bridge washed out by the rains last winter. The County, as the lead agency for this project is now in the process of repairing the washed out road by constructing a two lane bridge (26 foot wide) across the Otay River. Listed below is their proposed schedule for this construction. Receive bids: Award Contract: Pre-construction meeting: Begin construction: End construction: Open the roadway to traffic: December 10, 1993 December 16, 1993 January 6, 1994 January 13 ,1994 May 20, 1994 May 25, 1994 After last year's winter rains, numerous bridges and crossings in the County were damaged or washed out. The County requested proposals from sixteen fums for the design of these various bridges and they selected the top six firms for the design of the various projects. The County assigned the first project to the top rated company and the next to the second ranked company, and so on. The firm of McDaniel Engineering Company, Inc. was chosen by the County to design the Otay River bridge crossing project. A review of the consultant selection process indicates that they generally followed the Board of Supervisors' policy for hiring consultants. The only exception was that they shortened the time period required to complete the process. The bridge as proposed by the County will be 26 feet wide. However, in order to provide for the City's projected needs consisting of providing one lane northbound; two-lanes southbound (the lane southbound is for merging the trucks leaving the Nelson Sloan gravel area); and providing a bicycle lane on both the north and southbound directions, the width of the bridge needs to be 52 feet. Preparation of the plans to widen the bridge will be the City's responsibility. Since McDaniel Engineering Company, Inc. did the design plans for the County of San Diego for the 26 foot wide bridge crossing, we believe it to be in the best interest of the City to hire them to prepare the plans for the expansion of the bridge. To this effect we met with McDaniel Engineering to negotiate a contract for the design of the bridge expansion needed ~ c!-~O - (~ . , '1 i i ~l I ! John Goss, City Manager 2 November 22, 1993 . to acco=odate our needed width. We did not advertise nor request proposals from other consultants . Attached for your approval is a two-party agreement between the City and McDaniel Engineering Inc. for the bridge design consulting services for the Otay River Bridge Crossing. The cost of this work is $20,932.00. Page 2 and 3 of exhibit A of this agreement outlines the work the consultant is expected to perform. We are requesting that you execute the three copies of the agreement and return them to me. By signing below, you will authorize the encumbrance of $20,932.00 in a Purchase Order for McDaniel Engineering Company, Inc. to be used to pay for the services rendered per this agreement. The funds will come from budgeted CIP project Otay Valley Road Phase III, account number 603-6030-STM319. Please call me at your convenience if you desire additional information or would like to further discuss this request. Ie Date$- t r- jJ SLH:dv/rb Attachment .:\BOMI!II!HClINI!I!Il\DESlaNlWCDANII!L.SLB) . ~ tf. --y/ ~ Parties and Recital Page(s) Agreement between City of Cbula Vista and McDaniel Engineering Company, Inc. for Bridge Design Consulting Services for the Otay Valley River Bridge Crossing in the City of Cbula Vista ""'"' This agreement ("Agreement"), dated ~Olla.lu-Iw-. )..:. rttA~ for the plDpOses of reference only, and effective as of the date last executed unless another date is otherwise specified in Exhibit A, Paragraph 1 is between the City-related entity as is indicated on Exhibit A, paragraph 2, as such ("City"), whose business form is set forth on Exhibit A. paragraph 3, and the entity indicated on the attached Exhibit A, paragraph 4, as Consultant, whose business form is set forth on Exhibit A, paragraph S, and whose place of business and telephone numbers are set forth on Exhibit A, paragraph 6 ("Consultant"), and is made with reference to the following facts: Recitals Whereas, the City is desirous to widen the Otay Valley Road bridge crossing of Otay River; and Whereas, the City desires to retain a consultant engineer to prepare the widening plans 1 and coordinate with other reviewing agencies. Whereas, Consultant warrants and represents that they are experienced and staffed in a manner such that they are and can prepare and deliver the services required of Consultant to City within the time frames herein provided all in accordance with the tenns and conditions of this Agreement; (End of Recitals. Next Page starts Obligatory Provisions.) ~~--~ 1 WlC P!\lIO_OINEElNI<5.93 COll,3- '2.'11 Pl&e 1 . (e e OBLIGATORY PROVISIONS PAGES NOW. lHEREFORE. BE IT RESOLVED that the City and Consultant do hereby mutually agree as follows: 1. Consultant's Duties A. General Duties Consultant shall perfonn all of the services described on the attached Exhibit A, Paragraph, 7, entitled "General Duties"; and, B. Scope of Work and Schedule In the process of perfonning and delivering said "General Duties", Consultant shall also perform all of the services described in Exhibit A. Paragraph 8. entitled" Scope of Work and Schedule". not inconsistent with the General Duties. according to. and within the time frames set forth in Exhibit A. Paragraph 8, and deliver to City such Deliverables as are identified in Exhibit A. Paragraph 8. within the time frames set forth therein, time being of the essence of this agreement The General Duties and the work and deliverables required in the Scope of Work and Schedule shall be herein referred to as the "Defined Services". Failure to complete the Defined Services by the times indicated does not, except at the option of the City, operate to tenninate this Agreement C. Reductions in Scope of Work City may independently. or upon request from Consultant, from time to time reduce the Defined Services to be perfonned by the Consultant under this Agreement. Upon doing so, City and Consultant agree to meet in good faith and confer for the purpose of negotiating a corresponding reduction in the compensation usociated with said reduction. D. Additional Services In addition to perfonning the Defined Services herein set forth, City may require Consultant to perfonn additional consulting services related to the Defined Services ("Additional Services"), and upon doing so in writing. if they are within the scope of services offered by Consultant, Consultant shall perfonn same on a time and materials basis at die rates set forth in the "Rate Schedule" in Exhibit A. ParaJl'lph 11 (C). unless a separate fixed fee is otherwise agreed upon. All compensation for Additional Services shall be paid monthly as billed. E. Standard of Care Consultant, in performing any Services under this qreement, whether Defined Services or Additional Services, shall perfonn in a manner consistent with that level of care and Ikill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currendy practicing under similar conditions and in similar locations. ~ ~ --flJ WI'C ~~1NESN145.93 Pqe2 F. Insurance Consultant represents that it and its agents, staff and subconsultants employed by it in "") connection with the Services required to be rendered, are protected against the risk of loss by the following insurance coverages, in the following categories, and to the Jirnits specified, policies of which are issued by Insurance Companies that have a Best's Rating of "A, Class V" or better, or shall meet with the approval of the City: Statutory Worker's Compensation Insurance and Employer's Uability Insurance coverage in the amount set forth in the attached Exhibit A, Paragraph 9. Commercial General Liability Insurance including Business Automobile Insurance coverage in the amount set forth in Exhibit A, Paragraph 9, combined single Jirnit applied separately to each project away from premises owned or rented by Consultant, which names City and Applicant as an Additional Insured, and which is primary to any policy which the City may otherwise carry ("Primary Coverage"), and which treats the employees of the City and Applicant in the same manner as members of the general public ("Cross-liability Coverage"). Errors and Omissions insurance, in the amount set forth in Exhibit A, Paragraph 9, unless Errors and Omissions coverage is included in the General Uability policy. G. Proof of Insurance Coverage. (1) Certificates of Insurance. Consultant shall demonstrate proof of coverage herein required, prior to the commencement of services required under this Agreement, by delivery of Certificates of Insurance demonstrating same, and further indicating that the policies may not be canceled without at least thirty (30) days written notice to the Additional Insured. "") (2) Policy Endorsements Required. In order to demonstrate the Additional Insured Coverage, Primary Coverage and Cross-liability Coverage required under Consultant's Commercial General Uability Insurance Policy, Consultant shall deliver a policy endorsement to the City demonstrating same, which shall be reviewed and approved by the Risk Manager. H. Security for Performance. (1) Performance Bond. In the event that Exhibit A. at Paragraph 9, iDdicates the need for Consultant to provide a Performance Bond which iDdication shall be made by checking the parenthetical space adjacent to the term "Performance Bond", then Consultant shall provide to the City a performance bond by a surety and in a form satisfactory to the City Auomey in an amount indicated in the space adjacent to the term, "Performance Bond", in said Paragraph 9, Exhibit A. . WPC ~MEelOINEl5lNI"'." ~ t?-A/j/ '1 PIle 3 . Ie . I. Business Ucense Consultant agrees to obtain a business license from the City and to otherwise comply with Title S of the Chula Vista Municipal Code. 2. Duties of the City A. Consultation and Cooperation City shall regularly consult the Consultant for the purpose of reviewing the progress of the Defined Services and Schedule therein contained, and to provide direction and guidance to achieve the objectives of this agreement The City shall permit access to its office facilities, files and records by Consultant throughout the tr:nn of the agreement In addition thereto, City agrees to provide the infonnation, data, items and materials set forth on Exhibit A. Paragraph 10, and with the further understanding that delay in the provision of these materials beyond 30 days after authorization to proceed, shall constitute a basis for the justifllble delay in the Consultant's perfonnance of this agreement. B. Compensation Upon receipt of a properly prepared billing from Consultant submitted to the City periodically as indicated in Exhibit A, Paragraph 18, but in no event more frequently than monthly, on the day of the period indicated in Exhibit A, Paragraph 18, City shall compensate Consultant for all services rendered by Consultant according to the terms and conditions set forth in Exhibit A, Paragraph 11, adjacent to the governing compensation relationship indicated by a .check mark" next to the appropriate arrangement, and shall compensate Consultant for out of pocket expenses as provided in Exhibit A, Paragraph 12. All billings submitted by Consultant shall contain sufficient infonnation as to the propriety of the billing to permit the City to evaluate that the amount due and payable thereunder is proper, and shall specifically contain the City's account number indicated on Exhibit A, Paragraph 18 (C) to be charged upon making such payment. 3. Administration of Contract Each party designates the individuals ("Contract Administratorsj indicated on Exhibit A, Paragraph n, as said party's contract administrator who is authorized by said party to represent them in the routine administration of this agreement. 4. Term. This Agreement shall terminate when the Parties have complied with all executory provisions hereof. 17r t -~3 c Pqe4 WlC F~ME'CNOINIiER\II.'.93 S. Liquidated Damages The provisions of this section apply if a Liquidated Damages Rate is provided in Exhibit A, Paragraph 14. " It is acknowledged by both parties that time is of the essence in the completion of this Agreement It is difficult to estimate the amount of damages resulting from delay in per_ formance. The parties have used their judgment to arrive at a reasonable amount to compensate for delay. Failure to complete the Defmed Services within the allotted time.period specified in this Agreement shall result in the following penalty: For each consecutive calendar day in excess of the time specified for the completion of the respective work assignment or Deliverable, the consultant shall pay to the City, or have withheld from monies due, the sum of Liquidated Damages Rate provided in Exhibit A, Paragraph 14 ("Liql'ilfRtI'd Damages Rate"). Time extensions for delays beyond the consultant's control, other than delays caused by the City, shall be requested in writing to the City's Contract Administrator, or designee, prior to the expiration of the specified time. Extensions of time, when granted, will be based upon the effect of delays to the work and will not be granted for delays to minor portions of work unless it can be shown that such delays did or will delay the progress of the work. 6. Financial Interests of Consultant A. Consultant is Designated as an FPPC Fller. '1 If Consultant is designated on Exhibit A, Paragraph IS, as an "FPPC f1ler", Consultant is deemed to be a "Consultant" for the pmposes of the Political Reform Act conflict of interest and disclosure provisions, and shall report economic interests to the City Clerk on the required Statement of Economic Interests in such reporting categories as are specified in Paragraph IS of Exhibit A, or if none are specified, then as determined by the City Attorney. B. Decline to Participate. Regardless of whether Consultant is designated as an FPPC Fller, Consultant shall not make, or participate in making or in any way attempt to use Const1ltant's position to influence a governmental decision in which Consultant knows or has reason to know Consultant has a financial interest other than the compensation promised by this AgreemenL C. Search to Determine Economic Interests. Regardless of whether Consultant is designated as an FPPC Fller, Const1ltant wamnts and represents that Consultant has dlligendy conducted a search and inventory of Consu1tant's economic interests, as the term is used in the regulations promulgated by the Fair Political Practices Commission, and has determined that Consultant does not, to the belt of Consultant's knowledge, have an economic interest which would conflict with Consultant's duties under this , agreement . WIt: I':'8OMIl'CNOIN&IN105.93 ~ ~-~,6 Paae S . '. . D. Promise Not to Acquire Conflicting Irtterests. Regardless of whether Consultant is designated as an FPPC Filer, Consultant further warrants and represents that Consultant will not acquire, obtain, or assume an economic interest during the tenn of this Agreement which would constitute a conflict of interest as prohibited by the Fair Political Practices Act. E. Duty to Advise of Conflicting Irtterests. Regardless of whether Consultant is designated as an FPPC Filer, Consultant further warrants and represents that Consultant will immediately advise the City Attorney of City if Consultant learns of an economic interest of Consultant's which may result in a conflict of interest for the pwpose of the Fair Political Practices Act, and regulations promulgated thereunder. F. Specific Warranties Against Economic Irtterests. Consultant warrants and represents that neither Consultant, nor Consultant's immediate family members, nor Consultant's employees or agents ("Consultant Associates") presently have any interest, directly or indirectly, whatsoever in any property which may be the subject matter of the Defmed Services, or in any property within 2 radial miles from the exterior boundaries of any property which may be the subject matter of the Defmed Services, ("Prohibited Irtterest"), other than as listed in Exhibit A, Paragraph 15. Consultant further warrants and represents that no promise of future employment, remuneration, consideration, ptuity or other reward or pin has been made to Consultant or Consultant Associates in connection with Consultant's performance of this AgreemenL Consultant promises to advise City of any such promise that may be made during the Tenn of this Agreement, or for 12 months thereafter. Consultant agrees that Consultant Associates shall not acquire any such Prohibited Irtterest within the Tenn of this Agreement, or for 12 months after the expiration of this Agreement, except with the written permission of City. Consultant may not conduct or solicit any business for any party to this Agreement, or for any third party which may be in conflict with Consultant's responsibilities under this Agreement, except with the written pennission of City. 7. Hold Harmless Consultant Ihall defend, indemnify, protect and bold lwmless the City, its elected and appointed officers and employees, from and against all claims for damqes, liability, cost and expense ('mcluding without limitation attorneys' fees) arising out of the coDduct of the Consultant, or any agent or employee, subcontractors, ar others in COlIJlel!I;ion with the execution of the worlt covered by this AgreCmcnt, except only for those claims arising from the sole negligence or sole willful conduct of the City, its officers, or employees. Consultant's indemnification Ihall include any and all costs, expenses, attorneys' fees and liability incurred by the City, its off1cer&, qents, or employees in defending against such claims, whether.the same proceed to judgment or nOL WIC P!\IIO~JNEElNI45.93 ~~ tt. -/j,/ Plae 6 Further, Consultant at its own expense shall, upon written request by the City, defend any such suit or action brought against the City, its officers, agents, or employees. Consultants' , indemnification of City shall not be limited by any prior or subsequent declaration by the Consultant 8. Termination of Agreement for Cause If, through any cause, Consultant shall fail to fulfill in a timely and proper manner Consultant's obligations under this Agreement, or if Consultant shall violate any of the covenants, agreements or stipulations of this Agreement, City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof at least five (5) days before the effective date of such termination. In that event, all fmished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, reports and other materials prepared by Consultant shall, at the option of the City, become the property of the City, and Consultant shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed on such documents and other materials up to the effective date of Notice of Termination, not to exceed the amounts payable hereunder, and less any damages caused City by Consultant's breach. 9. Errors and Omissions In the event that the City Administrator determines that the Consultants' negligence, errors, or omissions in the performance of work under this Agreement has resulted in expense to City greater than would have resulted if there were no such negligence, errors, omissions, '} Consultant shall reimburse City for any additional expenses incurred by the City. Nothing herein is intended to limit City's rights under other provisions of this agreement 10. Termination of Agreement for Convenience of City City may terminate this Agreement at any time and for any reason, by giving specific written notice to Consultant of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof, at least thirty (30) days before the effective date of such termination. In that event, all finished and unfinished documents and other materials described hereinabove shall, at the option of the City, become City's sole and exclusive property. If the Agreement is terminated by City as provided in this paragraph, Consultant shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any lltisfactory work completed on such documents and other materials to the effective date of such termination. Consultant hereby expressly waives any and all claims for damages or compensation arising under this Agreement except as set forth herein. 11. Assignability The services of Consultant are personal to the City, and Consultant shall not assign any interest in this Agreement, and shall not transfer any interest in the same (whether by assignment or novation), without prior written consent of City, which City may not unreasonably deny. City hereby consents to the assiJlUDent of the portions of the Defmed Services identified in Exhibit A, Paragraph 17 to the subconsultants identified thereat as "Permitted Subconsultants". '} WI'C p,.ao_1NEElN145.93 ~i-YY - ....e 7 . (. . 12. Ownership, Publication, Reproduction and Use of Material All reports, studies, infonnation, data, statistics, fonna, designs, plans, procedures, systems and any other materials or properties produced under this Agreement shall be the sole and exclusive property of City. No such materials or properties produced in whole or in part under this Agreement shall be subject to private use, copyrights or patent rights by Consultant in the United States or in any other country without the express written consent of City. City shall have unrestricted authority to publish, disclose (except as may be limited by the provisions of the Public Records Act), distribute, and otherwise use, copyright or patent, in whole or in part, any such reports, studies, data, statistics, fonna or other materials or properties produced under this Agreement. 13. Independent Contractor City is interested only in the results obtained and Consultant shall perform as an independent contractor with sole control of the manner and means of performing the services required under this Agreement. City maintains the right only to reject or accept Consultant's work products. Consultant and any of the Consultant's agents, employees or representatives are, for all purposes under this Agreement, an independent contractor and shall not be deemed to be an employee of City, and none of them shall be entitled to any benefits to which City employees are entitled including but not limited to, overtime, retirement benefits, worker's compensation benefits, injury leave or other leave benefits. 14. Administrative Claims Requirements and Procedures No suit or arbitration shall be brought arising out of this agreement, against the City unless a claim has fll"st been presented in writing and filed with the CitY and acted upon by the City in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 1.34 of the Chula Vista Municipal Code, as same may from time to time be amended, the provisions of which are incorporated by this reference as if fully set forth herein, and such policies and procedures used by the City in the implementation of same. Upon request by City, Consultant shall meet and confer in good faith with City for the purpose of resolving any dispute over the tenns of this Agreement. 15. Attorney's Fees Should a dispute arising out of this Agreement result in litigation, it is agreed that the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover all reasonable costs incurred in the defense of the claim, including costs and attorney's fees. 16. Statement of Costs In the event that Consultant prepares a report or document, or participates in the preparation of a report or document in performing the Defmed Services, Consultant shall include, or cause the inclusion of, in said report or document, a statement of the numbers and cost in dollar amounts of all contracts and subcontracts relating to the preparation of the report or document. ~ <' ~-f'/ ....e 8 WI'C f:IHOldE'CNOINEEJl.\lI.S.93 17. Miscellaneous A. Consultant not authorized to Represent City """ Unless specifically authorized in writing by City, Consultant shall have no authority to act as City's agent to bind City to any contractual agreements whatsoever. B. Consultant is Real Estate Broker and/or Salesman If the box on Exhibit A, Paragraph 16 is marked, the Consultant and/or their principals Ware licensed with the State of California or some other state as a licensed real estate broker or salesperson. Otherwise, Consultant represents that neither Consultant, nor their principals are licensed real estate brokers or salespersons. C. Notices All notices, demands or requests provided for or permitted to be given pursuant to this Agreement must be in writing. All notices, demands and requests to be sent to any party shall be deemed to have been properly given or served if personally served or deposited in the United States mail. addressed to such party, postage prepaid, registered or c:crtif'ted, with return receipt requested. at the addresses identified herein as the places of business for each of the designated parties. D. Entire Agreement "'"" This Agreement, together with any other written document referred to or contemplated herein, embody the entire Agreement and understanding between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. Neither this Agreement nor any provision hereof may be amended, modified, waived or discharged except by an instrument in writing executed by the party against which enforcement of such amendment, waiver or discharge is sought E. Capacity of Parties Each signatory and party hereto hereby warrants and represents to the other party that it has legal authority and capacity and direction from its principal to enter into this Agreement, and that all resolutions or other actions have been taken so as to enable it to enter into this Agreement F. Governing LawNenue This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the State of California. Any action arising under or relating to this Agreement shall be brought only in the federal or state courts located in San Diego County. State of Califomia, and if applicable, the City of Chula Vista, or as close thereto as possible. Venue for this Agreement, and performance hereunder. shall be the City of Chula Vista. . [end of page. next page is signature page.] 1 ~ t-52J Pace 9 WJ'C FmtlME'CNOINEEIN 145.93 . Signature Page to Agreement between City of Chula Vista and McDaniel Engineering Company, Inc. for Bridge Design Consulting Services for the Otay Valley River Bridge Crossing in the City of C1u1a Vista IN WITNESS WHEREOF, City and Consultant have executed this Agreement thereby indicating that they have read and understood same, and indicate their full and complete consent to its terms: Dated: 1/-~1-9 :3 City of Chula Vista , Att?;t: ~{hfJ () ai.d?(j;~ BeverJ;1 thelet, City k '. A (~<Au"k . \ , Dated: McDaniel Engineering Company, Inc. By: M ~~~..J# ~~ W. MARK ASHLEY, PRFSIDENI' By: Exhibit List to Agreement ( x) Exhibit A. ( ) Exhibit B: . WI'C FmClIollNlNOINESNIC5.93 ~~p . Plie 10 Exhibit A to Agreement between City of Chula Vista and McDaniel Engineering Company, Ine. ~ 1. Effective Date of Agreement: December 1, 1993 2. City-Related Entity: ( x) City of Chula Vista, a municipal chartered corporation of the State of California () Redevelopment Agency of the City ofChula Vista, a political subdivision of the State of California () Industrial Development. Authority of the City of Chula Vista, a () Other: form] a [insert business ("City") ~ 3. Place of Business for City: City of Chula Vista, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910 4. Consultant: McDaniel Engineering Company, Inc. 5. Business Form of Consultant: ( ) Sole Proprietorship ( ) Partnership ( x) Corporation 6. Place of Business, Telephone and Fax Number of Consultant: S030 Camino De La Siesta, Suite 204 San Diego, CA 92108 Voice Phone (619) 692-1920 Fax Phone (619) 692-0634 ~ WI'C F:\IIOME'!:NGINEERII 146.93 ~~::Q - Page 1 . '. . 7. General Duties: Consultant shall design, prepare plans, specifications and estimate for the widening of a bridge across the Otay River at a point where Otay Valley Road crosses said river. Consultant shall provide all necessary coordination with other agencies necessary for their review and approval of the bridge design. The County of San Diego is shortly going to be constructing an 82'long x 28' wide Otay Valley Road bridge over the Otay Valley River. The Otay Valley Road bridge, once constructed by the County, is proposed by the City to be widened ]3' on each side to provide a total width of 54'. The widened structure will be AC. overlay on glued laminated deck on steel girders to match the bridge constructed by the County. 8. Scope of Work and Schedule: A Detailed Scope of Work: Coordination of Work Provide all necessary coordination with other agencies necessary for their review and approval of the bridge plans, specifications, and estimates. Site Review Design shall be based on the fmal "as built" structure constructed by the County. Consultant is responsible for all field measurements necessary to prepare his fmal design. Preliminary DesillD and Estimate A preliminary design and estimate will be submitted to the City for review and comment. this will ensure that proposed work meets with the City's proposed roadway work and is within City's budget. Plans. Soecifications and Estimate (PS&E) Consultant shall prepare plans, specifications, and engineer's estimate (PS&E) for the structures. In addition, a sketch and design data shall be prepared for a Change Order to the County of San Diego to include piles required for an expanded bridge, to the County's original construction. Plans shall be prepared on 24"x36" sheets in accordance with the City of Chula Vista plan requirements and the following CalTrans documents: 1. Bridlle Desim Specifications 2. Brid2e Memos to Deshmers WPC F:'B0ME'ENG1NEER1I146.93 ""B~ &~?) - Page 2 . . 3. BridlZe DesilZll Aids 1 4. BridlZe DesilZ1l Details Specification (Special Provisions) shall be prepared in accordance with CalTrans format, based on CalTrans Standard Specifications and Standard Special Provisions. Special Provisions will be submitted on mM diskette in Wordperfect 5.1 format. Hard copies will also be forwarded as required. In-House Review of Plans An in-house review of the structural design, plans, and quantity shall be made by McDaniel Engineering Company, Inc. Submission and Review of Plans The required number of sets of structural calculations, plans, special provisions, and engineer's estimate shall be submitted to the City of Chula Vista and County of San Diego for review and comment. Plans and specifications to be revised and resubmitted, as required, based on comments from the City of Chula Vista and County of San Diego. MeetinlZs """"' ! Consultant shall attend, as required, one preliminary design meeting and one meeting during the design process. B. Date for Commencement of Consultant Services: ( x) Same as Effective Date of Agreement () Other C. Dates or Time Limits for Delivery of Deliverables: Deliverable No. I: Preliminary Design, Estimate, and sketch for piles for County (20 days) Deliverable No.2: Submission of Unchecked Plans (45 days) Deliverable No.3: Submission of PS &. E (15 days) Deliverable No.4: Final Submission of Approved PS&.E (10 days) """\ , WI'C F:\II0MEIDIGINEEIl\lI46.93 ~ t? ~5y' Page 3 D. e Date for completion of all Consultant services: 120 days from effective date of agreement, assuming a review itme of not more than 30 days by the reviewing agencies. 9. Insurance Requirements: (x) Statutory Worker's Compensation Insurance (x) Employer's Liability Insurance coverage: 51,000,000. (x) Commercial General Liability Insurance: 51,000,000. ( ) Errors and Omissions insurance: None Required (included in Commercial General Liability coverage). ( x) Errors and Omissions Insurance: 5250,000 (not included in Commercial General Liability coverage). 10. Materials Required to be Supplied by City to Consultant: A. Civil plans for adjacent roadway construction. B. Location of existing utilities and identification of utilities to be carried on the structure, if any. C. Ie D. E. F. G. H. I. J. K. L. M. N. . Metal beam guard railings/crash cushions (off of the bridge). Roadway approach design and plans. Structure lighting and signing plans. Architectural renderings. Surveying work other than that require for "Site Review" for paragraph 8A above. Geotechnical engineering. Environmental documents/permits. Landscaping design. Grading plans. Traffic control/detour plans. Channel hydraulics and channel improvement plans. PS&E for utility facilities. ~ ~- f.-5 Page 4 WPC F,\II0ME\ENGINEERIlI46.93 I I. Compensation: A. (x) Single Fixed Fee Arrangement. .~ For performance of all of the Defmed Services by Consultant as herein required, City shall pay a single fixed fee in the amounts and at the times or milestones or for the Deliverables set forth below: Single Fixed Fee Amount: $20,932, payable as follows: Amount of Milestone of Event or Deliverable Fixed Fee Percent Preliminary Design and Estimate 20% Submission of Unchecked Plans 65% Submission of PS & E 90% - 100% will be paid after approval of the plans by the (100%) City of Chula Vista and the County of San Diego B. ( ) Phased Fixed Fee Arrangement. For the performance of each phase or portion of the Defmed Services by Consultant as are separately identified below, City shall pay the fixed fee associated with each phase of Services, in the amounts and at the times or milestones or Deliverables set forth . Consultant shall not commence Services under any Phase, and shall not be entitled to the compensation for a Phase, unless City shall have issued a notice to proceed to Consultant as to said Phase. "'"'" Phase Fee for Said Phase 1. $ 2. $ 3. $ C. ( ) Hourly Rate Arrangement For performance of the Defmed Services by Consultant as herein required, City shall pay Consultant for the productive hours of time spent by Consultant in the performanCe of said Services, at the rates or amounts set forth in the Rate Schedule hereinbelow according to the . following terms and conditions: (I) () Not-to-Exceed Limitation on Time and Materials Arrangement """" WPC ','HOMElENGINEEl<\1I'6.93 ~ 6 ->> <' Page S . Notwithstanding the expenditure by CAnsultant of time and materials in excess of said Maximum Compensation amount, CAnsultant agrees that CAnsultant will perform all of the Defined Services herein required of CAnsultant for $ including all Materials, and other "reimbursables" ("Maximum Compensation"). (2) () Limitation without Further Authorization on Time and Materials Arrangement At such time as Consultant shall have incurred time and materials equal to ("Authorization Limit"), CAnsultant shall not be entitled to any additional compensation without further authorization issued in writing and approved by the City. Nothing herein shall preclude Consultant from providing additional Services at CAnsultant's own cost and expense. Rate Schedule Ie Cateaory of Employee of Consultant Name Hourly Rate PRINCIPAL BRIDGE ENGINEER W. MARK ASm.EY $110.00 SENIOR BRIDGE ENGINEER PERRY SCHACIIT 90.00 ASSISTANT BRIDGE ENGINEER JOE TOGNOLI 65.00 BRIDGE DRAFTSPERSON TONY CASTREJON 50.00 () Hourly rates may increase by 6% for services rendered after [month], 19 . if delay in providing services is caused by City. 12. Materials Reimbursement Arrangement For the cost of out of pocket expenses incurred by CAnsultant in the performance of services herein required, City shall pay CAnsultant at the rates or amounts set forth below: ( ) None. die compensation includes all costs. Cost or Rate () Reports. not to exceed $ ( ) CApies, not to exceed $ ( ) Travel, not to excetd $ : .(x) Printing, not to exceed $ : > (x) Postage. not to exceed $ . > $300 Total . (x) Delivery. not to exceed $ . > ( ) Long Distance Telephone Owges. not to exceed $ . () Other Actual Identifiable Direct CAsts: . not to exceed $ . Dot to exceed $ WJCP:8l~-" ~ ~-5'? Plae 6 13. Contract Administrators: City: City of Chula Vista Shale Hanson, Civil Engineer """ Consultant: McDaniel Engineering Company, Inc. Mark Ashley, President 14. Liquidated Damages Rate: ( x) $0 per day. ( ) Other: 15. Statement of Economic Interests, Consultant Reporting Categories, per Conflict of Interest Code: ( x) Not Applicable. Not an FPPC Filer. ( ) FPPC Filer () Category No.1. Investments and sources of income. () Category No.2. Interests in real property. () Category NO.3. Investments, inter~t in real property and sources of income subject to the regulatory, permit or licensing authority of the department. ~ () Category NO.4. Investments in business entities and sources of income which engage in land development, construction or the acquisition or sale of real property. () Category No.5. Investments in business entities and sources of income of the type which, within the past two years, have contracted with the City of Chula Vista (Redevelopment Agency) to provide services, supplies, materials, machinery or equipment. () Category No.6. Investments in business entities and sources of income of the type which, within the past two years, have contracted with the designated employee's department to provide services, supplies, materials, machinery or equipment. () Category No.7. Business positions. WPC F:'flOME\ENGINEER\1I06.93 ~ r:~d -- "'"' Page 7 . f . . ( ) List "Consultant Associates" interests in real property within 2 radial miles of Project Property, if any: 16. () Consultant is Real Estate Broker and/or Salesman. 17. Permitted Subconsultants: No 18. Bill Processing: A. Consultant's Billing to be submitted for the following period of time: ( ) Monthly ( ) Quarterly ( x) Other: After reaching each milestone B. Day of the Period for submission of Consultant's Billing: ( ) ( ) ( ) (x) First of the Month 15th Day of each Month End of the Month Other: 15th day after each milestone C. City's Account Number: 603-6030-STM 319 ~G-~ Pase 8 WPC P:\II0MN:NGINEER\1106.93 ~ - This Page Blank- '1 ~ ~ "~kf} RESOLUTION NO. '75'8 '( 1,lt- '-0 C( /~ J)(O 'I '\ ,,\ ,L " ., P. rr It L H fVJFN T c:.. . RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA ACCEPTING BID AND AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 90-2 (OTAY VALLEY ROAD PHASES II AND III) FROM' ,200 FEET EAST OF NIRVANA AVENUE TO THE NORTHERLY LIMITS OF OTAY RIO SUBDIVISION IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CA. (ST-' 23 AND STM-3'9) AND APPROPRIATING FUNDS THEREFOR WHEREAS. at 2:00 p.m. on May' 7, , 993. in Conference Rooms 2 and 3 in the Public Services Building. the Director of Public Works receive five sealed bids for "The Improvement of Assessment District No. 90-2 (Otay Valley Road, Phases II and III) from 1,200 feet east of Nirvana Avenue to the northerly limits of Otay Rio Subdivision in the City of Chula Vista. CA (ST-123 and STM-319l" as follows: . Contractor Bid Amount 1. Signs & Pinnick. Inc. . El Cajon $2,374,136.70 2. W. R. Connelly, Inc. . Spring Valley 2,462.939.12 3. Granite Construction Company - San Diego 2,543,507.00 4. Erreca's Inc. - Spring Valley 2,685,947.00 5. C. W. McGrath. Inc. - El Cajon 3,274,470.00 WHEREAS. the low bid by Signs & Pinnick. Inc. is below the Engineer's estimate of $3.333.774 by $959,637.30 or 28.79%; and. WHEREAS. the low bid by Signs & Pinnick, Inc. had a minor technical irregularity which involved failure of the contractor to list all the subcontractors to whom the low bidder proposes to subcontract portions of the work; and. WHEREAS. although the bidder did not submit a complete list originally. h" subsequently provided a new list showing two additional subcontractor and this irregularity does not change the status of the original bid for meeting the contractor's DBE requirements; and. WHEREAS. on Phase II, in April 21, 1992. the City Council, by Resolution 16599, certified the final EIR (EIR-89.01) for Otay Valley Road Phases I & II and on Phase III, the negative declaration pursuant to CECA requirements for Phase III was filed on October 8. 1993 with the County Clerk's office (15.93.39); and. WHEREAS. the bid documents require the contractor to have disadvantaged business enterprises perform 15% of the work or show a good faith effort by the contractor to solicit such participation and Signs & Pinnick. Inc. have disadvantaged business enterprises performing 22% of the work. . ~ ?-t?/ . . Resolution No. 17518 Page 2 NOW. THEREFORE. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA DOES HEREBY FIND. DETERMINE. ORDER AND RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: """ Section 1. That the City Council certified the Final EIR (EIR-89-01) for Otay Val/ey Road Phases I & II and adopted the Negative Declaration (lS-93-39) for Phase III pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act. Section 2. That the City Council does hereby accept the bid of Signs & Pinnick. Inc. as responsive and waives the minor irregularity in the low bid consisting of the contractor's failure to list al/ the subcontractors in the original bid form. Section 3. The City Council finds that Signs & Pinnick, Inc. has clearly made good faith effort to comply with the DBE participation goals required by federal regulations for projects using federal funds. and has therefore satisfied the DBE participation requirements and has complied with the City of Chula Vista goals. J!;(p~ Director of Public Works I Section 4. Section 5. Section 6. ; . 'Section 7. . , Presented by .. The City Council awards the contract for the improvement of Assessment District No. 90-2 (Otay Valley Road. Phases II and III) from 1.200 feet east of Nirvana Avenue to the northerly limits of Otay Rio Subdivision in the City of Chula Vista in the City of Chula Vista. California to Signs & Pinnick, Inc.. known as document number C094-087, a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk. in the amount of $2.374,136.70, the lowest responsible bidder which submitted a responsive bid to the approved specifications, contingent upon receipt of bond proceeds and approval of the FY 1994/95 CIP Budget. """ The Mayor of the City of Chula Vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said contract for and on behalf of the City of Chula Vista. The City Council does hereby appropriate $871.266.85 from the unappropriated balance of Fund 637. Improvement Fund, to CIP Project ST- 123. The City Council does hereby authorize Department of Finance to set up the necessary expenditure accounts in Fund 637, Improvement Fund and revenue account for the SDG&E payment. ~ App" 'd;"~f~ Bruce M. Boogaard City Attorney ~ ~/r::..< . . Resolution No. 17518 Page 3 . PASSED. APPROVED and ADOPTED by the City Council of the City of Chula Vista. California. this 7th day of June. 1994. by the following vote: YES: Councilmembers: Fox. Horton. Moore. Rindone. Nader NOES: Council members: None ABSENT: Councilmembers: None ABSTAIN: Councilmembers: None ----.:/2. /' ,". '&-/., --+- ~ -"~ Tim Nade'r. Mayor ATTEST: . STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) 55. CITY OF CHULA VISTA) I. Beverly A. Authelet. City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista. California. do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 17518 was duly passed. approved. and adopted by the City Council at a regular meeting of the Chula Vista City Council held on the 7th day of June. 1994. Executed this 7th day of June. 1994. ~ C! a -;;r.U;, Beverly . Authelet. City Clerk . ~ j/tf-J - COUNCil.. AGENDA STATEMENT '""" Item Meeting Date 6n /94 SUBl\u1 u;D BY: -- . ~ ") 'j f Resolution Accepting bids, and awarding contract for "The improvement of Assessment District No. 90-2 (Otay Valley Road, Phases n and ill) from 1,200 feet east of Nirvana Avenue to the northerly limits of Otay Rio Subdivision in the City of Chula Vista, CA (ST-123)" and lIppropriating funds therefore. ~~ ;I Director of Public wory (f(V City Manager (4/5ths Vote: YesLNo--> ITEM TITLE: REVIEWED BY: At 2'00 p.m on May 17, 1993, in Conference Rooms 2 and 3 in the Public Services Building, the Director of Public Works received sealed bids for "The Improvement of Assessment District No. 90-2 (Otay Valley Road, Phases n and ill) from 1,200 feet east of Nirvana Avenue to the northerly limits of Otay Rio Subdivision in the City of Chula Vista, CA (ST-123)" The work in general includes: mobilization, traffic control, removal and disposal of existing improvements, clearing and grubbing, relocation of existing facilities, excavation and compaction, import and compaction, asphalt concrete pavement, aggregate base, subbase, curb and gutter, sidewalk, driveways, chain link fencing, erosion 1 control, silt fencing, various drainage inlets and structures, reinforced concrete pipe, street lighting, median barrier, pavement striping and signing, landscaping and irrigation, street survey monuments, protection and restoration of existing improvements and relocation of all facilities in conflict with the proposed improvements. It also includes Otay Valley Road bridge widening improvements crossing Otay River and the construction of all appurtenances and other work as may be necessary to render the above improvements complete and workable. RECOMMENDATION: That Council: .' 1. Waive minor irregularity in the low bid consisting of the contractor's failure to list all the subcontractors in the original bid form. 2. Appropriate 5871,266.85 from the unllppropriated balance of Fund 637, Improvement Fund, to elP Project ST-123. 3. Authorize Department of Finance to set up the necessary expenditure accounts in Fund 637, Improvement Fund and revenue account for the SDG&E payment. 4. Accept bids and award contract to Signs & Pinnick, Inc. in the amount of 52,374,136.70 contingent upon receipt of bond proceeds and approval of the 1994/95 CIP Budget. BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Not lIpplicable. 1 ~?~( . Page 2, Item Meeting Date 6r1194 DISCUSSION: Back2Tound The widening of Otay Valley Road from I-80S to the northerly boundary of the Otay Rio Subdivision has been planned as a phased project In June 1992, the City Council, by Resolution No. 17204, awarded a contract for the first phase of the project. Phase I extended from I-80S to 1,200 feet east of Nirvana Avenue and is now in progress. The proposed contract will construct Phases D and m. Phase D will extend from 1,200 east of Nirvana Avenue to the northerly limits of the Otay River bridge crossing Phase m will widen the existing 26-foot wide bridge presently being constructed by the County to a width of 52 feet tying the roadway to the northerly limits of the Otay Rio Subdivision (see attached map). Phases I and D were proposed to be funded via the formation of Assessment District 90-2. Phase m is a separate CIP project approved in the FY 1993-94 budget (STM-3 I 9). Bonds for Phase I were sold in September, 1993 and staff anticipated selling bonds for Phase D in July, 1994. When Council authorizes the bond sale you will also be requested to approve deposit of those funds into Fund 637, Improvement Funds to CIP Project ST-123. . Bid Results Bids for construction of Phases D and ill of the Otay Valley Road widening project were received from five contractors as follows: CONTRACTOR BID AMOUNT 1. Signs & Pinnick, Inc. - El Cajon $2,374,136.70 2. W. R. Connelly, Inc. - Spring Valley $2,462,939.12 3. Granite Construction Company - San Diego 2,543,507.00 4. Erreca's Inc. - Spring Valley 2,685,947.00 5. C. W. McGrath, Inc. - EI Cajon 3,274,470.00 The low bid by Signs & Pinnick, Inc. is below the Engineer's estimate of$3,333,774 by $959,637.30 or 28.79%. The low bid by Signs & Pinnick, Inc. had a minor technical irregularity. The irregularity involved failure of the contractor to list all the subcontractors to whom the low bidder proposes to subcontract portions of the work. Although the bidder did not submit a complete list originally, he subsequently provided a new list showing two additional subcontractors (see attached letter). This irregularity does not change the status of the original bid for meeting the contractor's DBE requirements. The Council by approving this resolution will be waiving this minor irregularity in the bid. . ~ ~-~S- Page 3, Item Meeting Date 6nt94 --""\ Disadvanta!!ed Business Enterorise Goal The bid documents require the contractor to have disadvantaged business enterprises perform 15% of the work or show a good faith effon by the contractor to solicit such participation. Sign and Pinnick Inc. have disadvantaged business enterprises perform 22% of the work. Juan Arroyo, Housing Coordinator, has reviewed Signs & Pinnick, Inc. effon to meet the City's DBE participation requirements for this project. His conclusion is that Signs & Pinnick, Inc. has complied with the City's goal (See attached memo). Environmental Status Phase D - In April 21, 1992, the City Council, by Resolution 16599, certified the fmal ElR (ElR- 89-01) for Otay Valley Road Phases I & D. Phase ill - The negative declaration pursuant to CEQA requirements fOT Phase m was filed on October 8, 1993 with the County Clerk's office (1S-93-39). Disclosure Statement Attached is copy of the contractor's disclosure statement. ""'" Prevailin!! Wa!!e Statement This project will be funded from various sources (see Financial Statement, below). Prevailing wage scale as those determined by the Director of Industrial Relations, State of California are applicable to this project. Financial Statement '. The project combined two ClP projects: 1) Assessment District No. 90-2, construction of Otay Valley Road Phases I and D (ST123) and; 2) the construction of Otay Valley Road Phase 3 (STM-319). Therefore, listed below are the funding requirements based OD each of the projects as a separate project. """ I ~ ~~~~ Page 4, Item Meeting Date 6nt94 . Fin~ncial SUltement . FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUcnON OF OTAY VALLEY ROAD PHASE n A. CODll'aCl Amoum (estimated cost for Phase n construction $1,808,136.70 only) ($2,374,136.70 Total Bid - $566,000.00 Phase Ill) B. COIIliniencies (approx. 10%) 180,813.67 C. Add'!. Riiht-of-Way Expenses for Mitiiation Area <1 roadway 128,600.00 D. Staff Costs (construction inspeaion, traffic inspection, desien 200,000.00 construction) E. Water meter, and water usa&e cost to construct and m.im. in 82,500.00 the landscapin& .. F. Material and soil testin& 75,000.00 G. MonilOrin& 25,000.00 H. Postin& a Permits Bond for $484,000 (State and Federal 18,150.00 a&encies) cost 1. Assessment District Costs 180,452.00 Total funds required for construction Phase n $2,698,652.37 Total funds required for construction of Otay Valley Rd. Phase I Total funds required for construction Phases I <1 n Otay Valley Rd. $4,262,926.48 $6,961,578.85 . FUNDS A V AD...ABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF - PHASES I AND n PORTION OF OT A Y V ALLEY ROAD A. RedevelopmeDl Aiency - Otay Valley Project F1md (Fund 621) $338,334.00 (ST-123) B. Transportation DIF (Fund 621) (ST-123) 106,994.00 C. Appropriation of funds from 1IDllPProprialed ....I.nr.e of 871,266.85 improvemeDl fund - (Fund 637) to ST.123 D. Bond Series B (pendin& bond proceeds) 2,490,163.00 E. SDG<1E Paymen! . (Fund 637) 130,000.00 F. Otay Valley Road AD 90-2 (ST-123) - (Fund 637) 3,019,028.00 G. RedevelopmeDl Aiency - Otay Valley Project Fund (Fund 996) 5,793.00 (RD-20S) Total funds available for construction $6,961,578.85 ~ / -t?? Page S, Item Meeting Date 617/94 """'\ FUNDS REQUIRED FOR CONSTRUCTION OF OT A Y V ALLEY ROAD PHASE III A. Contract Amount (estimated cost for Phase III, $S66,OOO.OO construction only) ($2,374,136.70 Total Bid - $1,808,136.70 Phase II) B. Contingencies (approx. 10%) 56,600.00 C. Additional Right-of-Way Expenses for Mitigation Area 38,000.00 D. Staff Costs (construction inspection, traffic inspection, SO,OOO.OO design construction) E. Bridge Construction Change Order with the County of 40,000.00 San Diego (estimated cost) .' F. Water meter, and water usage cost to construct and 13,500.00 maintain landscaping G. Monitoring 10,000.00 H. Posting a Permits Bond for $484,000 (State and Federal 6,000.00 agencies) Cost I. Material and Soil Testing 12,000.00 Total funds required for construction Phase III $822,100.00 '"""\ FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION OF PHASE III PORTION OF OT A Y V ALLEY ROAD TransNet (STM-319) $68,910.47 Proposed 1994-95 CIP Budget 753,189.53 Otay Valley Road Phase III - Fund 603 STM 319 Total funds available for construction $822,100.00 nSCAL IMPACT: The landscaped slopes in the mitigation area are being maintained by tbe contractor for period of 5 years. The restoration and revegetation plan imposed by tbe State and Federal agencies require the City to post a 5-year bond to parantee the completion of the mitiaation work. This bond is for S484,OOO and is estimated to cost $18,150 for Phase n and $6,000 for Phase m. At tile eDd of this time, it is anticipated that staffs work in the area will be minim.! because tbe native plants will be establisbed both on the slopes and in the mitigation area resulting in no further irrigation of the area or maintenance. The roadway itself will require routine City maintenance. ~ c:: -~r '1 Page 6, Item Meeting Date 6/7/94 . Otay Valley Road Phase II and III are included in Cycle 4 and 5 (phase II and III) respectively, of the State Local Transportation Partnership Program (SLTPP) known as SB300 funds. The deadline for award of the project under cycle 4 is June 30, 1994. This program is anticipated to reimburse the City an amount equal to 22.43% of the consttUction costs (0.2243 x 1,808,136.70 = $270,985.06) for Phase II or $375,478, whichever is less, and it is anticipated that 20% of the consttUction cost for Phase III or approximately $114,000. These funds will be placed in the Transportation Partnership Fund (Fund 253) for use for future projects. Series B Bonds for Phase II consttUction are estimated to provide $2,490,163 in revenue to Fund 637, Improvement Fund. SLH.AO-088-6. AO-087-6 WPC M:\BO!dE'\E\GD-;EER\AGE-."DA\19r48.94 Attachments : Locator Map Subcontractor list, dated 5-19-94 Memo - Juan Arroyo, dated 5-24-94 Contractor's disclosure statement . . Y ;;, r-t.f Z ' , SCALE NONE 8GN.PHASE /I STA 76+00 ' RO CT, ~ i::: ~ ~ ... ""'~ l!::l t~ OEL NIS~ C:l' U~ 'RANOW Cli: ~ tlLEANOER Rl ~ ~ SCALE; NONE 1-10' ~ /1, . .~ f\O~O ~ ~~ ~~ ~~ ~Dl t,,-Ji? /j. ..;. DrAY VALLEY ROAD "I DENNING PHASE I. /I 8 11/ INTERIM CONSTRUCTION eO~~UT!. ~JL~ OT.~~.~2 CUU,lItN .Y All ."..1. . . . ..,IGNS ':J!!J ~/NNICK Ir=GENERAL ENGINEERING CONTRACTORS May 19, 1994 Shale Banson City of Cbula Vista 276 Pourtb Av.nue Chula Vista, CA 91910 RB: Subcontractors for Otay Val1.y Road Phase %1 . %%1. Babitat W.st 160 Bl Valle Opultno Vi.ta, CA 920B3 Babitat Restoration Lic 1 C27-672030 Cal Trans CT-021941 Pbone 59B-B671 Pacific soutbw..t Biologic.l s.rvic.s, %nc. P.O. Box U5 National City, CA 91951-09B5 Land.cape / Biologi.t Lic 1 C27-531247 Pbone 477-5333 Summi t Surveyors 1532 Tavern Road Alpine, CA 91901 Surv.yors Lic 1 RCE-2B92B Pbon. 561-4600 Sapper Con.truction P.O. Box 600630 San Di.go, CA 92160 Concr.te Barri.r Lic . A-22B646 Cal Tran. 84B150 Pbone 280-3650 . Romero General Construction P.O. Box 460696 Bscondido, CA 92046 Paving Lic 1 A657359 Cal Trans 192-B015511 Pbone 489-B412 Union Pence P.O. Box 7119B3 Sant.e, CA 92072 Pence Lic 1 575557 Pbon. 448-9336 Bnni.. Bnt.rpri..s %nc. 12135 Royal Road Bl Cajon, CA 92021 Bridg. St.el Lic . 310267 Phon. 561-1101 P.yco Sp.cialti.., %nc. 120 N. S.cond Av.. Chul. vist., CA 91910 Striping . SigD.g. Lic . 298637B, C23 .bon. 422-1620 .1.... Dot.: due to an ov.rsit. duriDg . fran.ied bid pr.par.tion, Bnni.. and P.yco _re Dot submitt.d with th. bid. k-tiL .iDc.r.ly, St.v. Bamilton . LICENSE No. 299932 685 FRONT STREET ~. t: ~ ,/ / (819) 579-8333 EL CAJON, CA. 92020 ~ MEMORANDUM May 24, 1994 TO: Cliff Swanson, Deputy Director of Public Works/City Engineer ~ Juan P. Arroyo, Housing coordinato~ Minority and Women Business Enterprise Construction Program - Otay Valley Road Phases II & III - Signs and Pinnick, Inc. Bid Proposal nOM: SOBJECT: I have reviewed the Signs & Pinnick, Inc. bid proposal for compliance with the City's Minority and Women Business Enterprise Construction Program and have determined that the contractor has provided the necessary documentation to indicate that the company plans to achieve the City's goals for minority and women business enterprise participation. JA:ag """\ cc: Roberto Saucedo, Senior Civil Engineer (AG\A:\Pl~.CK.~) D1S!': B '1 ~ ~ -70/- .., . THE CIn' or CIIUlA VISTA DISCLOSURE STATEMENT You are required to file a Statement of Disclosure of certain OWllership or fiIlancial interests, payments, or campaign ltributions, on aU mailers which wiU require discretionary action on the part of the City Council, PJaDDing Commission, ~'(.au otber official bodies. The foUowing information must be disclosed: I. Usttbe names of aU persons having a financial interest in Ihe property which is the subjecl of the applicalioD or the contracl, e.g., OWller, applicant, contractor, subcontractor, material supplier. MASON PINNICK. JR. BILL SIGNS. JR. 2. U any person' identified pursuanllo (I) above is a corporation or parlnership,lisllhe names of aU individuals OWlling more than 10% of tbe sbares in the corporatioD or owning any partnership interest in Ibe parlnership. MASON PINNICK. JR. BILL SIGNS. JR. 3. U any person' identified pursuant to (I) above is non.profil organization or I lrusl,lisIthe names of any person serving as director of the non-profit organizalion or as lruslee or beneficiary or lnlStor of the 1nlSt. N/A ~. 4. Have you had more tban 5250 worth of business transacted wilh Iny member of the City S1aff, Boards, Commissions, Commillees, and Council within the past rwelve monlhs? Yes_ Non If yes, please indicate penon(s): 5. Please idenlity each and every person, including any agents, employees, collSll1la11lS, or independenl contractors who you have assigned to represenl you before Ihe City in Ihis mailer. Richard M. Pinnick Jerrv N. Lev;R 6. Have you Ind/or your officers or 1genlS, in the Iwegate, conln'buled more than $1,000 10 I Council member in the current or preceding election period? Yes_ No..IX If ya, stale wllich CoUDcillllem~r(.): . . . (NOTE: Attada additloaal ..... .. .~) · · · Dale: Mey 17.1994 '. Sipllure of contraCtor/applicant , PINNICK, INC. ~VDDV M YVWTC a~c~ UT~~ DD~eTnENT . ~,,4~.,4.~ 'An, i'4;M4""'fif~~:2~,,~::',..,~_/:::':~::~~=:~:::::hi' elld ."y ocltrr nun')'. tity end touflr".. my "umirip.lity. d..ritt.., -.Iter ,...,aUi.OII. .,.",.,..,.,."., ---- -.... 1PtiI,- / ~~ -. MEMORANDUM DATE: April 27, 1995 FROM: The Honorable Mayor and City Council ~ n. John D. Goss, City Manager J-G1 bjr~ James B. Hardiman, Fire Chief~ -7 TO: VIA: SUBJECT: IFC Report regarding Relationship with General Roca At the 3/21/95 meeting of the City Council, it was referred to the International Friendship Commission to report back with recommendations on the City's future relationship with General Roca, Argentina. The Commission met to discuss the matter on 4/26/95. Attached is the report forwarded by the Commission. In summary, the Commission recommends that: (1) The Chula Vista community be advised of the intent to consider severing the sister city relationship with General Roca, and that a community forum be held a minimum of 60 days following the public notice; (2) Preliminary steps be taken to form a linkage with Carcarana, Argentina; (3) Any final determination made with regard to the relationship with General Roca be made after the International Sister Cities Conference in July. Staff concurs with the Commission's recommendation. Chula Vista Fire Department 7-1/7-2. MEMORANDUM DATE: April 26, 1995 TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council FROM: The International Friendship Commission SUBJECT: Proposed Relationship with General Roca Prior to receiving word of your Council Referral seeking the advice of the IFC concerning our future relations with General Roca, the IFC had planned to appear before you to seek your guidance on this very matter. May we direct your attention to Chair Ramirez's Memo to the Commission dated November 16, 1994 (a copy of which is provided herewith). This memo outlines the numerous attempts we have made to reinvigorate relations with General Roca. After years of no official contact, the IFC began corresponding with a contact person in General Roca in 1991. We even had a visit from this individual in July of 1994. However, nothing further resulted from this recent contact. Our chair recently contacted Sister Cities International Program Director Rick Gerrard to seek his advice as to how we might best handle this matter. Dormant relations with sister cities is a common problem of the program. Mr. Gerrard said that unless Chula Vista sends a delegation to General Roca, the chances of "jump-starting" the relationship are poor. He has seen this with other cities in Argentina. The position of Sister Cities International is that good faith efforts should be made to reinvigorate the relationship, but that if they fail, it is most appropriate to "divorce" yourself from your sister city. To do so, Chula vista would need only to send a letter to Sister Cities International requesting formal dissolution of the relationship. A copy of the letter should also be sent to General Roca, giving reasons for the action taken. Our chair questioned Mr. Gerrard about the awkwardness of canceling a sister city. What would we do about our monuments which make reference to General Roca? He said you just take them down, or you redo them with the name of a replacement sister city. There is another aspect of our relations with Argentina which we ask that you consider. As mentioned in Chair Ramirez's November 16th memo, there is in Chula vista a group of citizens who have established a relationship with another city in Argentina, namely Carcarana. Mr. Ricardo Marentez, who resides in Chula vista, has taken a youth basketball team to Carcarana two (2) years in a row now, and he has informed the IFC Chuta Vista Fire Department 7~3 The Honorable Mayor and City Council Page 2. that the team from Carcarana will be coming to Chula vista for a visit this July. Mr. Marentez has asked that the IFC consider forming a sister city relationship with Carcarana, and its leader has expressed an interest in formal relations with Chula Vista. (Please see attached letters. Under Sister City International guidelines no American city may have two (2) sister cities in the same foreign country. (Note: We are told San Diego was granted an exception when it formed a relationship with Tijuana because of its special border relationship. San Diego is also the sister city of Leon, Mexico.) While the IFC does not take lightly the cessation of formal relations with Chula Vista's first sister city, we have come to the conclusion that this is something which must be given serious consideration. We suggest the followina course of action: 1. The IFC should alert the Chula Vista community of its intent to consider severing its "sisterhood" with General Roca. Following a sixty-day notice/review period, interested parties in the community would be invited to address the IFC on this matter at a special workshop meeting scheduled solely for this purpose. If much interest is shown in continuing relations, the IFC should make every effort to assist interested citizens in forming a Friends of General Roca group, along the lines of the recently- formed Friends of Ussuryisk. Plans would need to be made for the sending of a delegation to General Roca as soon as possible. 2. Meanwhile, Mr. Marentez should be instructed as to what would be required of a group interested in forming a sister city relationship. We have suggested guidelines from Sister City International to aid in this process. Formation of a Friends of Carcarana group would be encouraged. In the event General Roca remains our sister city, nothing would preclude Chula Vista from forming a formal linkage with Carcarana; it is just that SCI will not recognize the linkage and no SCI grant monies would be given to further this relationship. In the event General Roca and Chula Vista cease to be sister cities and there is a viable Friends of Carcarana group the IFC would encourage the formal establishment of "sisterhood" between Chula Vista and Carcarana. 3. Hopefully one or more IFC or Council Members will attend the annual Sister Cities International Conference in Indianapolis in July. A significant delegation from Argentina, including the Ambassador to the U.S., will be in attendance. The conference will address free trade and economic development and will also focus on how municipalities can strengthen their sister city relations. Perhaps it would be wise to postpone any final determination regarding General Roca until insights to be gained at this conference are considered. Chuta Vista Fira Department 7.,r The Honorable Mayor and City Council Page 3. A representative of the IFC will appear before you to answer any questions you may have concerning this report and the issue it presents. The IFC will encourage Mr. Marentez to also be present. It is the position of the IFC that until such time as the community is polled and a special workshop is held to consider this mater, no definitive action should be taken by the Council. ATTA~KTS NOT SCAN\IED ~ Chula Vista Fire Department ?-5' :IT? MEMORANDUM DATE: TO: FROM: RE: 27 April 1995 city council Suzanne Ramirez, IFC Chair Report to Council re organizational structure sister city programs are generally structured in one of three ways: association, city commission, corporation. It appears that from its inception, Chula vista's program has operated through a ci ty commission--the IFC. sister cities International recommends the corporate structure with a 501(C) (3) tax exempt status. The corporate status provides certain benefits, to wit: limitation of liability, and increased ability to raise funds. Even before learning that SCI highly recommends the corporate structure, the members of the IFC had come to believe it is time to consider incorporation of Chula vista's sister city program. Contact was made with both the City of San Diego and El Cajon to learn about their programs' structures. Our chair spoke with Marilyn Lynn (441-1761) in the El Cajon City Clerk's office. She has been involved with the El Cajon program for many years and, in fact, has served as the president of their sister cities organization. From the inception of their program, their sister city program was run by an organization separate from the city. However, their mayor was an active member of the organization. Their sister city program historically has received some money and in-kind donations (such as use of city facilities) from the city. They are now incorporated and have a 501(C) (3) tax exemption. They currently have four (4) sister cities. They are paired with cities in Mexico, Australia, Germany & the Ukraine. Ms. Lynn reports that activities wax and wane in the various cities. Re San Diego, our chair spoke with Karen Rohrbauch (236-6330). She is Mayor Golding's deputy chief of protocol. Ms. Rohrbauch indicated San Diego's program began and expanded with the formation of various independent sister city committees. The Charter assigns to the International Affairs Board responsibility for oversight of the sister cities program, among its other duties. Apparently there were some problems with the lack of coordination between the various committees and perhaps vis a vis the city, also. So, in 1993, San Diego formed San Diego sister Cities Corporation, a non- profit corporation. It now serves as the umbrella entity for all of the sister city committees. Ms. Rohrbauch described their current status as being "in transition because of its recent non- profit status". The corporation receives TOT funds ($5000 in FY94 7-7 / / / and $10,000 in FY95). It is staffed by a part-time executive director who is housed in a City office. As you are aware, the IFC has a minimal budget. It is a nine (9) member commission which has been charged with responsibilities much too onerous for nine part-time volunteers. More community involvement is needed. And additional funding sources are needed. It is virtually impossible to gain donations for the City of Chula Vista. It is believed that obtaining donations and volunteer assistance would be easier if the program were operated in the form of a non-profit corporation. It would be easier to organize activities, especially those requiring a flurry of last-minute activity, without the restrictions of the Brown Act (which would be inapplicable to the non-profit). with fundraising and much of the labor intensive work of the sister cities program being done by the non-profit, it is anticipated that the IFC could strengthen its role in other areas of international friendship in addition to overseeing Chula Vista's sister cities activities. We are addressing you at this time to seek your endorsement for the formation of a non-profit corporation for Chula vista's sister city programs. Should you agree with us that this is advisable, we ask that you direct that staff be assigned to assist in this process. Legal advice will be needed from the City Attorney or his designee. Staff assistance will also be necessary to determine the ideal division of responsibility between the newly-forming non-profit corporation, the existing IFC and the City Council. Legal documents will need to be drafted and filed. For this, too, we seek the assistance of the City Attorney or his designee, or, if it is more economical to do so, we ask your permission to expend IFC and/or city funds to hire outside counsel to draft and file the documents. Be advised that sister cities International has provided us with a prototype document, and that we have asked both El Cajon and San Diego to share their documents with us. Thus, the City Attorney would not need to "start from scratch". A representative of the IFC will appear before you to answer any questions you may have concerning this report and the issue it presents. ?~r April 28, 1995 SUBJECT: The Honorable Mayor and City counc~11 John D. Goss, City Manager~ ~(i~ IFC Report - Agenda Item No. 7 ~ TO: FROM: When the Council agenda packets were prepared last night, the attachments referred to in the report from the IFC were inadvertently omitted. Attached is a copy of Chair Ramirez' memo to the Commission dated November 16, 1994, as referenced in the report. JDG:mab 7-j t. .' ~Vt.- r- -t:_~ ~~~- ~ ..~ el1Y OF CHUlA VISTA 1N1'ERNA11ONAL FRIENDStIP COMMISSION . . MEMORANDUX DATE: TO: FROM: RE: 16 November 1994 IFC commissioner~ Suzanne Ramirez,~Chair Report on Status of General Roca As I mentioned at our recent Commission meeting, when the issue of a possible Russian sister city came before the city Council at its October 4th meeting, there was much concern expressed regarding the deterioration of our sister city relationship with General Roca, Argentina. This concern was voiced both by members of the public and members of the city Council. I am writing this report as a means to apprise all concerned of what efforts have been made recently concerning the possible re-establishment of. active relations with General Roca. First, for the benefit of those with little of no knowledge of the history of our sister cities, I would like to give a little background information: It was in 1961, a mere five (5) years after President Eisenhower inaugurated the People to People program out of which grew Sister Cities, that Chula vista and General Roca formed this city's first sister city relationship. In the early years, there were a number of official exchanges, with dignitaries from one city visiting the other. There was also a contingent of citizens from Chula vista which visited General Roca. Those citizens are now elderly, but some of them are still living here in Chula Vista. There was at least one Argentinean high school student who spent a year here in Chula Vista, in 1968 at Hilltop High School I believe, and in the home of Mrs. and the late Jack Unger. Mr. Unger was a "founding member" of the IFC. The exchange student the Ungers hosted was Eduardo Longo. The Ungers last visited General Roca and Eduardo Longo in 1989. When I was appointed to the IFC in mid-1991, one of the tasks I offered to take on was that of attempting to re-establish contact with General Roca. Doris Cox, long time IFC commissioner and current "commissioner emeritus", and long-time friend of the Ungers gave me the history of the early years of General Roca. From her, I obtained the contact information for the Ungers. I made contact with them and obtained the current address for Eduardo Longo, now a family man and odontologist. I first wrote to Dr. Longo in October of 1991. At the same time, I wrote to Mr. Horacio Coleman Lerner who, according to Sister 7~/tJ 271 FOUR1M AVENUE' CHULA VISTA. CAUFOANIA 11110 . . Cities International, heads up the sister cities program in Buenos Aires. (copy of letters attached.) It was not until April of the following year (1992) that I received a reply from Eduardo Longo. (See attached letter dated March 23.) According to his letter, the individuals who were previously active with their commission had passed away or had relocated. He indicated their records reflected we had lost contact in 1982. He also indicated their newly elected "provincial governor"/mayor was very much interested in reactivating relations. He was asked by the mayor of General Roca to put together a new commission. He suggested that Chula vista write directly to their mayor. 1 The letter from Eduardo Longo was translated (copy attached) and presented to the IFC on June 1st. The commission moved that a packet of information be sent to the mayor of General Roca by Geri Gulbransen, Public Information Officer, and that Mayor Nader also send a letter to him indicating Chula Vista's support for re- establishment of relations and inviting the mayor to visit Chula vista. In June, I provided a copy of Dr. Longo's letter and a translation of it to the Mayor's office and requested that the City send an official message to the provincial governor. I also worked with Geri Gulf.ransen who put together a packet of information to be sent along with the Mayor's letter. In August, Mayor Nader sent a letter and the information packet to the provincial governor. (Copy attached.) Also in June, I sent a letter to the editors of both the Star News and Neighbors seeking "Argentina-philes". (Copy of letter attached.) The letter ran in June in both newspapers. I am sorry to report I received only one (1) phone call in response to those letters. I also sent 'a personal reply to Dr. Longo on June 12th mentioning my letter to the editor, my request that the mayor write to the provincial governor and inquiring as to progress in the re- formation of an "IFC" in General Roca. (Copy attached.) In July of 1992, our mayor received a request for financial support from Argentina. It was passed on to the Commission. As I recall, the general feeling both from the IFC and the mayor's office was that the request was inappropriate and the most "politic" means of "responding" was to ignore it. (A copy of that request is attached. ) In August, when I received a copy of the letter sent by Mayor Nader to the mayor of General Roca, I again wrote to Dr. Longo, sending along a copy of the Mayor's letter to their mayor. (copy attached.) In that letter, I requested a couple of recent photos of General Roca for the new brochure being prepared for the IFC by Geri Gulbransen. In late October of that same year (1992), I re:eived a reply from ?-II ." -. Dr. Longo. He sent some photos and slides which I passed on to Geri Gulbransen for use in the new IFC. Dr. Longo indicated in that letter that their mayor had received Mayor Nader's letter, that he was very interested and that he indicated he would reply immediately. (Copy attached.) To my knowledge, our mayor never received a reply from the mayor of General Roca. In October of 1993, the IFC became aware of a youth basketball team from Chula vista, coached by Ricardo Marentez, which had been invited to participate in a two week tour of basketball competition in Argentina. (Our Chula Vista team was to be the first and only American team in what is otherwise an all Latin American tournament.) The team was holding various fund-raising events and sought support from the IFC. At its November meeting, the IFC designated the team-members official delegates to General Roca, provided a quilt as a gift to that city and allocated $100 to the team with the express understanding that the team would act as ambassadors of the City and would report either to the IFC or the City Council upon its return. As it turned out, the team never made it to General Roca. Query: What became of the quilt? The star News reported recently that the team (Chula vista Patriots) will: again visit Argentina this December. So I contacted Mr. Marentez to see if General Roca can be visited this year. He explained that the city to which they travel is carcaraftA. While it is very near the airport of Rosario, it is more distant from Buenos Aires. And General Roca is still quite far frQm Buenos Aires. CarcaraftA is a city of 15,000 inhabitants. They host our youth basketball team in their homes; there is no hotel in the town. There is an agreement for the team from Carcaraft6 to come for a visit to Chula Vista next year. I asked Mr. Marentez to please keep the IFC informed as the IFC would probably be happy to host the team at some event while the visitors are here. Mr. Marentez suggested that because of the current active relationship with the town, perhaps Chula vista should adopt CarcaraftA as its sister city in lieu of General Roca. In April 1994, the IFC received a copy of a letter from the International Law Institute regarding a uS-Argentina program. The letter was discussed at the April IFC meeting and Commissioner Alvarez was given the task of looking into it further. Commissioner Alvarez reported at the May 1994 meeting that he had sent a letter to ILl in Washington D.C. but had not received a reply. (The minutes actually say he wrote to General Roca, but that is in error.) He subsequently learned that the anticipated funds were less than anticipated and the program ultimately was only put in place for Buenos Aires and washington D.C. In July at the Sister cities International Conference in Louisville, Kentucky, I had the opportunity to speak with Rick Gerrard, SCI staff person, regarding the General Roca problem of lost contact. He indicated that perhaps we should sever the link and establish a new sister city link in Argentina. He did offer, however, to check his contacts through the Embassy in Buenos Aires 1 ?-/2- and get back to me with a status report. He did say that Argentina, in general, is quite anxious to form sister city relationships with American cities; so he urged us to keep an Argentinean link. In fact we discussed two specific cities he thougWmight be appropriate for us in the event General Roca is non-responsive. They were Puerto Madryn, which is not far from General Roca and which encompasses a rich marine reserve (common interest with our Nature Center?), and Salta which is an orange- growing region near the Paraguay border. I thought the former would be a good match. He urged the latter because he personally knew an Argentinean woman currently stateside from that city who would personally get the program going there. I returned to Chula Vista expecting to make a recommendation to the IFC that we consider severing our link to General Roca. Prior to the SCI conference I did not realize this was a possibility. It is not only a possibility, in fact, SCI is encouraging it in instances where sister city relations were either never fruitful or had broken down. 1 Much to my surprise, awaiting me upon my return from Kentucky was a telephone message from Commissioner Nancy Taboada informing me that Eduardo Longo was actually in Chula Vista. An informal gathering was held at Fuddruckers. The Mayor gave Dr. Longo and his wife Chula vista pins and a key to the city which he was asked to deliver to the "mayor" of General Roca. Dr. Longo gave to Mayor Nader a number of items from General Roca, including a videotape of the city. I have recently requested that Mayor Nader return the tape to the IFC. commissioner Taboada put Eduardo Longo in touch with Jess Valenzuela of Parks and Recreation as a mean to get in touch with Mr. Marentez to confer concerning the youth basketball team. The Longo's were scheduled to travel to Disneyland and home to Argentina the following day, as I recall. To my knowledge, there has been no further word from General Roca. I was informed in late October by Rod Davis of the Chula Vista Chamber of Commerce that the u.S. Men's Field Hockey team which is in training at the Olympic Training Center would soon be making a trip to Argentina. I contacted the team coach, Mr. Lenny McCaigue (282-0469), to inquire. I was informed the team would be going for a trial run in late January and would be participating in the Pan American Games in March. They will be in Mar del Plata on the coast about one hour from Buenos Aires. They will not be visiting General Roca. The Argentinean team will be hosted by the u.S. in the Spring of 1996 in Atlanta, Georgia. So, where do we go from here? If there were a group of citizens in Chula vista willing to travel to General Roca, that would be an ideal way to re-establish contact. If there were a grant program to foster Argentina-U.S. exchanges, that, too would work. If the new mayor and council assistant could assist the IFC with General Roca to the extent the current one has assisted the mayor with Ussuriisk, this too would make a big difference. By means of this memo, I seek the input both from the IFC members and the Council members. ?-J;1 " . 21 de octubre de 1991 Sr. Eduardo H. Longo 1128 Isidro Lobo General Roca, Rio Negro Argentina Estimado Sr. Longo: Por medio de la presente, me presento ante Ud. Qomo nueva comisionada a la comisi6n de la Amistad Internacional de la Ciudad de Chula Vista, California. Hemos obtenido su nombre y direcci6n del Sr. Jack Unger, con quien entendemos que Ud. adn mantiene contacto. Como Ud. sabe, la ciudad de General Roca y la Ciudad de Chula Vista se reconocieron como ciudades hermanas en el afto 1961. Las relaciones oficiales entre nuestras ciudades en tiempos pasados eran considerables. Nos entristece el hecho de que estas imnportantes relaciones casi han desaparecido. Nos qustar1a mucho poder entablar relaciones entre nuestras ciudades hermanas. La agradecer1amos mucho si Ud. nos podr1a sugerir los medios apropiados para reestablecer contacto oticial con su ciudad. En espera de su grata respuesta, me despido; Muy cordialmente, Lic. Suzanne Ramirez Comisionada cc: Terry Thomas, Chairperson Chula Vista International Friendship Commission Jack Unger 7~/1 ~Vt.. ;1~~ ~ ~~~~ ~....- - CllY OF CHUlA VISTA j;-';-1'ERNATIONAL FRIENDSHIP COMMISSIOl\ 21 de octubre de 1991 Sr. Horacio Coleman Lerner, Secretary General Sister cities Foundation of Buenos Aires Sarmiento 630-14th floor Capital Federal 1041 Buenos Aires Argentina Estimado Sr. Coleman: Por medio de la presente, me presento ante Ud. como nueva comisionada de la Comisi6n de la Amistad Internacional de la Ciudad de Chula vista, California. Consequimos su nombre y direcci6n de la oficina de Sister Cities International. Nuestra ciudad y la ciudad de General Roca se reconocieron como ciudades hermanas en el afto de 1961. Aunque al inicio de nuestra hermandad, nuestra relaci6n fue considerable, por medio de intercambios de visitas, etc6tera, desafortunadamente, en el presente, esa relaci6n ya no existe. Es con motivo de reestablecer las buenas relaciones que hemos tenido en aftos pasados que le escribe. Le suplico me informe c6mo reiniciar contacto oficial con la ciudad de General Roca. Le aqradeceremos mucho cualquier informaci6n y/o apoyo que nos puede ofrecer. En espera de sus gratas noticias a la mayor brevedad posible, me despido. " ' ~~a.--........ ,(.A~ Lic. Suzanne Ramirez Comisionada cc: Terry Thomas, Chairperson Chula Vista International Friendship Commission /' 7 --/)7 276 FOURTH AVENUE/CHULA VISTA. CALIFORNIA 92010 ~ ~tk",tk ;t. ~ ODONTOLO.O ..IIUOU_N 14M "~ ...... .... ......U. ROC. eRN) Generol Roca (R.rl.),t-lerzo 2' de 1992. Sonora Suzanna RamIrez 276 fourth Avenue Chul~ VIsta CA 9201D-Callfornla U.S.A 1 Estimada sel"iora Ra",lrez; Heblendo reclbldo cu c~rta el pasaco mes de no- vlembre, comrmc5 10 Inva~tigac16n do 10 que hab!t1 ocurrldo con 18 comls16n do cludlldes hermanos. Sobre 01 particular, le hago conocer que algo-I nos miembros de 1" antlgUa comisi6n no Sl! oncl'entran vIvos y otros han emlgrado s otrlB ciudades, raz6n por la cual no encontrl respuosta alguns. Por tal aituaci6n me dirig! al s~r.or Intendente el que fuars electo en los prlnll,ros d!as del mes de dicie,abre paslldo, quI en loa puso al t"nto qW() desdo el al"io 1982 so hab!a pordido contacto con nuestra cluded hernoana, de-I "ostrando a su vez esta autoridad, mucho inter's en relnlclar nuestras relaclones olv.!, adas durante tanto tiampo. Este f'rncionario local me cOI>llslon6 para ponerl 1111- on funcionsmiento le aludica comis16n, raz6n por 1a cual me hallo abocedo a Intonhrl un Ilcerc3!,dento cie varios clud..donos. de nuostra cludad p~ra formar una nU9va .junta. Sin pur Julclo, Sellura Ra..llroz, qU!!l Ustoo puudal escriblr dlrectal:1enle 01 "lunlclplo do nuostra cludad, cuya direcci6n es;Sar;;,lento 'I I i'lHre~CP~B'n~Prc,vincia de R!o U.cgro-Argentina, dondo sin duda serlin racibldas sus mi- sivas por el sol"ier Intendente,Doctor Miguez sAIZ, Usted puede dlrlgirse directol~nte II 101 persona pars cualqular gest16n 0 tr'mlte que sobre el partlcular crlla Yo pueda rea- llzar. Quedando a sue gutas 6rdenee, 10 saluda atente. menta. 7-/1 Eduardo Longo I.Lobo l12B~Gral.Roca-R.negro RepGbllce Argentins -../ General Roca (Rio Neqro) March 23rd, 1992 ~ Dear Ms. Ramirez: Havinq received your letter this past November, I beqan an investiqation into what had happened with the commission of sister cities. Concerninq this matter, I inform you that some of the members of the old commission are no lonqer livinq and others have relocated to other cities, for which reason I qot absolutely no response. Because of this situation, I approached the provincial qovernor, who had just been elected the. first of December. He informed me that since 1982 contact with our sister city had been lost. He also indicated much interest in reinitiatinq our relations which were lost for so lonq. The provisional qovernor commissioned me to puttoqether a sister city commission. Thus, I find myself in the process of approachinq various citizens of our city in order to form a new council. It would be no problem Ms. Ramirez if you write directly to the Administration of our city. The address is Sarmiento y Mitre; CP-8332; Provincia de Rio Neqro; Arqentina. Without doubt, your letter will be received by the provincial Governor, Dr. Miquez SAIZ. You may write directly to me personally about whatever question or procedure which you believe I may be able to handle. I remain at your service and send warm reqards. Eduardo Lonqo I. Lobo 1128 General Roca-Rio Neqro Republic of Arqentina 7~/l -_/ ~~~ :!""""'l.:. ~ ~~~~ ....."€;~~ (llY OF (HUlA VISTA INTERNATIONAL FRIENDSHIP COMMISSIOt.. .. . . 1 June 1992 Letters to the Editor Chula vista star News 835 Third Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91911 Dear Editor: Attention Argentina-philes I Chula Vista's International Friendship Commission (IFC) wants to reestablish relations with our sister city in Argentina: General Roca, Rio Negro. We need your help. After nearly ten years of dormant relations, we are again in contact with General Roca. They are working to reestablish their sister city commission. We are starting to form "Friends of General Roca". If you are interested in becoming a part of this core group of individuals who will be instrumental in bringing the people of these two cities together once again, please contact me ASAP . Many of the citizens of Chula vista are unaware of the existence and purpose of the city's International Friendship commission (IFC). Chula vista's IFC is the successor to the Sister City commission which was formed in 1958. Sister cities is a "people to people" concept designed to promote world peace through mutual knowledge and understanding of peoples of other cultures. Chula . vista got its first sister city pairing in 1961: General Roca, Rio Negro, Argentina. We have since been paired with Irapuato, Mexico (1971) and Odawara, Japan (1981). OUr present contacts with both Irapuato and Odawara are excellent. The IFC is also in the process of Updating its mailing list. If you have an interest in becoming active in any of the activities of the IFC, please contact me. There is a need for host families, for translators, for fund raisers, corporate patrons, and for energy and idea people. If you like people and enjoy interacting with people from other cultures, you are the type of person we are looking forI Things are starting to happenl Now is the time to get involved I We welcome your ideas, comme~ts, quest~ns~ su;~~J:"Ra-;'i;ez :-~issioner Chula Vista Int'l Friendship Commission P.o. Box 8674 Chula Vista, CA 91912 585-9321 ?-/~ 276 FOURTH AVENUE/CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 92010 - '-/ " /:l.. tl.. !~. 1 "0 r4. 'fL nc.p ~';-' -,,~ ft,~~: . , . . ~ AIAA ,_ .1.OM ~ .1\4~' k"-....... c"."..~ , (;J., . ~ ~.i'J- .4." .,.~.., . ~ A Co' ...." ."..,.... e.I, ~~ 'I # "A_. tL "'"~,,:.. c. h' ,,'""C.;' Q .-.... .4- .0, 0 .,J.J . t.tl..... c....l ~flfll....~. a..-l~"- -- .~-,,-J' rt..l-.A,,_ c"~4.. 'V..;."-' ? ,J. ,.~~,"-'. ~ ._--(. "-C '-" CA.~~"'- ___ ~.~.. .1.--_1 _~ ~W-n- ..... A~. k. ';''''Ir~- d-o' ,t. t ..J,. c J...o .(II.... ~ ~ .,..... ~."1' 4J1ld. c.~~V ~ oL... 4."~ . tt. .t4.;L.Q. ,...,.,; ~ pI 1#11:...:....';...0- .l# k- r-- 4-f(~ .L_ 41' 4f? ~ 1-0 [-".oJ ~ ~ . .. ~. ofl-<.. A6~ ""'.r~41~ ~ A..& 'lIA.,.__ ~ ".11.1. J_ .0 r.L ~ ..-.......Cr- A..I I1It; . .ct'~G r/c.--"- <<l'~ Jf) 7 . ~ _I....~ ,1--tA 1(" '-"" ?~/J ~ " .z. A.....~.''''1 ~ "i'~':"l ~.h. .A~Ii':iJ.t4I- I A. ~JAiz.. ~ ~.4l.~) ..It.. ~""... "'" ..'I ~ .~_v 14"'J"t- e.~u:'~ - ~ i.r.,.,...'H:';.... ~ CJu,~V~ -'1 ~ "'II'~' . I . d,,~"1A~ .Jv... c, t~.to oltll'Uit.o~.,I-L 1'1'" e~"-".".,,,t. ~, .e, ~~'- 1- c}...,(, ji,.. ip. .J4, ~ ~ ~.t.f!'f'lp ~ "'/"/Il-.- kb:~ ..._.-a._A. ~/l."...J..:,,, ~ y"'... I~ _ ~ .#44. . J ~1.U,,(~,1;~ ~ t1.c. ....,~ .If#.. tc. '- Jl, . , I I~ """'- .. 4(t ~ . . IJ _ 'L:.. '.. J_ J;1t&,.- A.."'I'lt."-\t' r'"Jlll..c.~ ~ ~'l'-.t"~ i:>A- ~~~r-r~~ ~I ~ lJ_ ~ . ~ .-... _ d ~ ~.,IA. /*-.1..d c~ A.. .'f & $ _,.I.'-~ it.' rlt: - c.h'-e JJ,M... ..,t..-.e:t-v:' /........, ...,....,.U~ _.J~ J'O I .J..- , , .~~ ..~.. $" ., ~ 1t..1, .1JI.l. JI J -J._... ..L.- ........ 7 - c2CJ ~ 1 -3. -.. ~ ~ ~ n"l".Jl&.o tl'DW~ ~ c..- htl. 't M.. ..tI~A.4..A.... .4- ,.. .., ... t,..4,..~0"~~,,,,- ~ r~ """- ~ .rL- ~ ~'A':s4~ r- ~ pp~",__ .,~ .....c....~:' Cl?-~~.p~A~ . ,- tl-r ~ ~IU\.~'. Chr,~ T ~ rJ..., ~"f ..~ ~J".~ .;1.... ..k- ~ ",lH .,6;,,-lIi,k ~ ~ eJ...~ 7I'~.) "'--.- .Ao .".~.. wk, ~ .J.- ~..:J.< "fJiA 11 .,k\.4le.~~'_ ..n..'p ef", fJI,..,J-. II'!- -. ;t:c..~,.. . ~-..:~ ~. 7/,;2./ . J ::~@ ~ 0 w m fnl :'Ul} .lIL .J, 1992. ~ L' Lei'" .:::-~,..._-~ Ii ~/~:~,..."i.~..:~:;f1CES- _.~.'.l"":.!: ,~:-.:,~~.rtl -- . _. ,-",' .. Argentine leJlllb110 General looa Prodnce : of lio .ell'o ,~a7 lOn., 1992. .- ,~. ALOAIiDK ayOR IlUBICIl'AI. (I5'J!J:RJ)Aft) ODle. ne. OU7 OALIlOUU If. VU.... D1I'e01;or . of 81lb3ect I linancial 81lpport for a S001al Pr03ect. Proposed b71 Linooln Center , 110ri4a 935 - Bllenos A1res - ArgenUna - 80ll1'Oe . Gale !tesearch' Ino. - Book Towel' - Detroit, Mich1gan (48226 ) -- On behalf of Olll' IneUtllUon, Il"lnted the Soc1al Stltlls naaber 894 throulh ])ecree 699/91, it is a pl.aslll'e to set in tOllch with 7011 in'order to let TOil know Olll' need to have YOIlI' economic eupport for the purchase of a tranaportaUon vehiole and/or a building to be used ae Social Headquarters for retired people. !he pre.ent ooste of the ..1d aits are ae foL1ows. .. Veh101. . Bl1lld1q1 VIS' 10,000.- VIS 35,000.- We attaoh a desoription about the institut1on, pre~ent needs, geoSZ'llPhio location and 4etaUs abollt our famiUes. We sball be looking forward 70ur ans.er and/or anI question to _te ollr elata olearer. I 7->> ,ty.t1CISeO A....clU 0/11.... ,~ ,-' ...,. JOU.; ~~~ot Sllb3eot . ALOALDK JQ Oula V18 CALI!' D. Illfl'ICllAI, 01"1 - Argentina - Z, Direotor . of - SIlPPOrl for a We attaoh a deBor tion abollt the in itution, pre~ent phie location a detaila about our amilieB. Proposed b,.. ooln Center 10ri4a 935 .- SOllre. . Gal. Research '. On behalf of Inst itllt ion, grante nWlb r 894 thrOllgh Deere. 9/91, it is a plnB 70U in 'order to let Oil lmow olir need to porl for the purohas of a transportation b. IlBed as Social H dquarters tor retir the Social 9t8tl18 to get in tOl1oh ve your eonnomic hiole and/or a buil people. needs, S followSI Vehiei,. I Bl1lldinsl 10,000.- 35,000.- ~, w. shall be n to make Ollr da t newer and/or an,. / IlI^tlC:1SCO A,'f'tI\U CA'~ ,JIIIIIlill18 Addre.. Call. Cadano ..q. Te. 25033 - Grel. C.P. 8332.- - Kellql14n 8008- R.K._ RA- ~ t t r:~. .n ~J. p ~ ['~. CE:!T!'O C: I :TI"!~:2. Jc:,c'~j~ " I, Y r::;:'~."'\~'JJ 11~'JI;:...:;.,',L[) L~:1;'.~:,. ~',J~,\ ._. r.::.~'~:C:':~._. . i. DSTITUTIOR ........ The ReUred Center, which 1nclade, fOl'lller lIanioipal1t,y worker, and that i, looated in the cit,y of Oeneral Rooa, Rio Regro, Argentine RepuDlio, i' a ,yoang institution created on Jane 6th., 1991, and devoted to give to all the lIemDer famille' (600) all what ia oonddered a, the lIi88ing 1 gap regarding to health, food, and growth, be,idea offering the u'e.of ita organization for an,y previsional, legal, teohnioal and sooioeoonomic lev..l nQ,lIire.enta. , The institution has a pneral a4mlnlstrative adv1Bor.r. board. Th18 Doard inclades a physioian and a law,yer,and a stead.r team of Social Workers in charge of interviewe, coordinaUons and oonstant need .valllatione. The lI&in aim of the inStitlltion is to flllt111 all tbe expeotations and. enjo,yment that the retired pep1e have in lIind in order to face the last .top of their lite. We think we are on the good traok. . . Buidea the sooial oenter plaoed in the building we have to rent, we are organizing a branoh to be IIsed aa the Home Inn b,y those retired people who oOlDe to 0111' oity to pt better lIedical aaeistanoe and/or visit to their families. A hoase lent b,y the State will be used for this aoolal purpose, with a oapacit.r of 8 beds,and it ie free of any charge for retired people. There is aleo a COmllanity Infirmary read.r __ lor J'ir,t Aid and other need, of retired people, in the .ame p1ece. n.. ~ESE)qT nEllS Our c olUltr,y is going throllgh. an ec onomic Cr ids and constant changes. That ia why it is extremely difficlllt to get en,y kind of J ana, donationa, financial sapport Or an,y long term loan and/or help to fulfill our two lI&in objeotives. So, the parchase of both a transportation vehiole far at. least 8 people (althoagh it is a aecond hand one) and the houee we now rent, woald meet oar o&aic neede. All this lead u, to tell .roar inati tuUon oar 8ituation and hope ,you wi: be able to give as some help .to carry oat oar oDjective,. .. III. J:,O(lATIOt Our Soc1alCsnter is located right in the oorner ot Dr. Jos4 B. Gadano street and tellQ,1I4n stre.t, ot the cit.r ot General loca, provinc. of Rio R.gro. The popalation 1s s8tilllated aDout 80,000' people, and the cit.r 1, w1thin a fertile valley whers the _in activit,y 1, the growing of apple, which are exported to BlIl'ope and Allerica, ooth as tre,h trlIit and as concentrate jllioe. ___ ) - .J..:3 The province of lIfo tegro i. oon81dered a. one privilepd city tor the fllbre .... to it. important sea coast, lon,t; velle"s ander pr~ IIction, e~~ellent cattle, and winter re'ort places lip in the high Andu mountains area. Rio legro i8 part ot a hup region known a8 patagonia whioh compri.e. all the land to the South of Colorado Riv.r and all tll.e WfA,Z down_up to the end of the OOlUltr" where developll<' t.. ~ 'f jr~G ?"\ .-. ~. ...... Doard lnOI~4e'a.~nys Worker8 in charge e..,..l~atioDs. 1an-&Lna .- J.."3.~'. auy. 'lilt .."......'-"..___- --" __...._h_ interviews, coordinations and constant need The main a ot t.le insUtllUon i_ to hUill all t expeotations and' enjoymen that the retired yeple have 0 er to tace the last ..top 0 their lite. W. think we a traok. II..i _ the ~OOi~l center place in the bail t~nt, we are rsanizing a branoh to be ed as the Ho Inn by tho retired peopl who come to o~r city to t better med a1 assilta and/or viI to their tamiliee. A ~ee lent by eState wil be used tor th sooial purpoee, with oapaoity of edl,and it s free of any o rge for retired people There i_ ale Commanity ntirmary ready or riret Aid and other eeds of reti~ people, i the same place. REEDS country ie oing thro~gh n economio cr cone+.ant change . That il whY is extreme y ditticult to t any kind of J ans, don ionl, tinano s~pport or ny long term nand/or help to tul! 1 our two ma objeotivel So, the parche of both a transporta on vehiole f at least 8 eople (altho~ it is a second hand one) nd the house e now rent,/ ould meet our sic needs. All thi lead ~Ito te your In_t (ution our litu ion and hope you wi be ab to sive UI I e help to rry out our OD ectives. I III. Soc ial C iSht in the corner f . Josl I. ano Itreet nd Neuq~4n st et, of the city 0 General Roca, provin ot Rio Ne on is estimated a ut 80,000 people, and he oity is ithin a tertiI valley where the ain activity il ins ot app I whioh are ex to E~rope a Amerioa, Doth as uit and a concentrate ju s oonsidered ne privileged qe to its 1m ortant sea Co&lt lon~ valleyl under winter resort aoes ~p in the Negro ie part of a huge region known 1 the land to e South of Colorado the way down to the end of the country where developm( om etely aohieved ye . 1'. IIEJIBIRS or THI CENTER ------ 1I0_t of the members are over 60 yeare old and also most of them has retired from Munioipality services after oarrying our unskilled, heavy and many times very risky works. Beoause of their intelleotwal oapacity, they n.edto be within an organization whioh can oack them up and state the ~irantee to meet what they as a group and ind1vidwall1 stand in need. ' - ~V?- ~-: ,~~ CI1Y OF CHULA VISTA WF'CE OF THE MAYOR ~rlM .....OER ~ . August 12. 1992 Provincial Govemor Dr. Miguez Salz Sarmiento y Mitre . . CP-8332 Provincia de Rio Negro ARGENTINA Dear Dr. SaIz: On behalf of the City of Chula Vista. I would Uke to express our Interest In reinvigorating our Sister City affiliation. Now more than ever It Is Important to focus on fostering Intemational relations. Sister City relationships promote cultural exchanges. mutual understanding and Increased international relations, thereby making a lignlficant contribution toward global peace. Enclosed are current informational meterlals on our City. I know that Nancy Taboada. Chair of our Intematlonal Friendship CommIsslon,and Suzanne Ramirez, Vice Chair, are enthusiastic about promoting this relationship. I am In IUPport of their efforts. and look forward to expanded opportunities for exchange between our cities. . Sincerely. .:G.. ~/~__' . TIm Nader Mayor TN:pw genroc 7 ~ ;2.? "I FOURTH AVENUEICHULA VISTA. CALIFOI'lNIA "1101(11".1-lI044 .-." ; 30 de agosto de 1992 Sr. Dr. Eduardo H. Longo 1128 Isidro Lobo General Roca, Rlo Negro Argentina ......., Estimado Dr. Longo: Adjunto le envlo copia de la carta que nuestro alcalde le ha enviado al aetior intendente Dr. Miguez Saiz. Lamento que hemos tardado tanto en este paso. Le escribo en este momento para pedirle un favorcito. Estamos listos para mandar a la imprenta nuestro nuevo folleto de promoci6n para la comisi6n. El folleto lleva un breve informe sobre cada una de nuestras ciudades hermanas. Deseamos incluir una 0 dos fotos de cada una tambi6n. ,No me podrla regalar una 0 dos fotos de su ciudad--algo que,le darla al lector una idea de c6mo es la vida de General Roca y sus habitantes? Se 10 agradecerlamos mucho. Agradeci6ndole au atenci6n, le saluda atentamente, Lic. Suzanne Ramlrez comisionada cc: Nancy Taboada, IFC Chairperson . .-... ? ~ ..26 Calle: Isidro Lobo 1120-Ciudad General Roca- R!o Negro-Argen- tina. Octubre 12 de 1992. . 3e~ora Susana Ramiroz Chu1a Vista- Estadcs Unidos Estimada senora; Tengo e1 agrado de dirigirme a Usted. en respuesta a su carta recisntemente recibida. En e11a Usted me pide unas fotos de 1a ciudad de Gener4 Roca. 1as quo destinar!a a 1a pub1icaci6n en una rovista que 81 Municipio vuestro edita. por tal motivo 1e adjunto una cierta cantidad de e11as. inc1uidos dos Sli- de. material del cu~l Usted se1eccionar4 sin dudas 10 que m's 1e interese. [stuve hgb1ando con e1 Intendente d' este medio y me d! jo qU3 ha~!a rocibido 1a carta que au par de Chu1a Vista le enviara. mostr'ndose/ on esa m~o,ento muy interosado y me manifest6 que inmediatamante ccntestar!a la m! siva recibida. [n esa opcrtunid~d. nuestro Intendente ae interes6 ad~ m4s por los intercac~ios cu1tura1es qua se pudiesen rea1izar entre ambas ciudade~ 10 Gue sin dud a enriquacer!a aun m4s 1a comunicaci6n actual. Cordia1mente. 7-~ 7 COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ITEM TITLE: ITEM r MEETING DATE: Mav 2. 1995 1 t. /71"3"'..3. 1 t Reso u 10n approv1ng a contractua agreemen with Artist Team victor Orozco Ochoa and John Neal Hill for the South Chula vista Library Public Art Mural Project ~ Library Dire~~~U 19 city Manager(Jl..f't 1I4/5ths Vote: Yes_No-1L) SUBMITTED BY: REVIEWED BY: The California Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act grant budget for the South Chula vista Library includes $46,821 (one percent of the construction budget) for works of art. Early in the design stage it was determined that this money would be used for the creation of a large scale mural in the Children's Story Hour Room. The artist selection process has now been completed and an agreement negotiated. Under the grant, 65% of the costs ($30,434) are paid by the State and 35% ($16,387) are paid by the city. RECOMMENDATION: That the City Council adopt the resolution approving the contractual agreement with the Artist Team of victor Orozco Ochoa and John Neal Hill for the execution of the Public Art Mural Project in the Children's story Hour Room at the new South Chula vista Library, based on the theme of "International Friendship and Understanding." BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Library Board of Trustees and the Chula vista Cultural Arts Commission have supported the project by appointing four of the five Mural Committee members who were responsible for selecting the finalist for the Public Art Mural Project. DISCUSSION: I. MURAL SELECTION PROCESS Although the City's contract with the project architect, LPA. Inc., specified that the architectural team would select the public art for the new library, a mechanism was needed to select the artistes). In response to a recommendation from the Cultural Arts Commission, the Library Board of Trustees and the Cultural Arts Commission jointly developed a plan for selecting the artist. On March 8, 1994 the City Council approved the "Report on the Artist Selection Process for the Public Art at the South Chula vista Library" (Attachment A). As part of this process to select a qualified artist, the following five names were nominated for the Mural Selection Committee and subsequently approved by the City Manager. lj"/ Item Meeting Date: 'ff , Page ~ Mav 2. 1995 -Dency Souval and Lee Wheeland (nominated by the Cultural Arts Commission) -Constance Clover-Byram (nominated by the Library Board of Trustees) -Doris steinman (nominated by the Friends of the Chula vista Library) -patricio Chavez (jointly nominated by the city's Cultural Arts Coordinator and the Library Director) The Mural Selection Committee, chaired by Dency Souval, held numerous public committee meetings, as well as a Public Focus Group Meeting, to give the community an opportunity to share their vision of the mural and their ideas for student involvement. A Request for Qualifications (Attachment B) was mailed to over 1,000 local artists with forty-six submitting proposals. The following criteria were used by the Mural Committee to select the qualifying semi-finalists: -Appropriateness for existing South Chula vista Library architecture -Sensitivity to the region's local character, social dynamics and cultural history -The applicant's previous work, technical qualifications and ability to meet the project's requirements -A theme of international friendship and understanding -Involvement of children in the design and/or fabrication process -Low maintenance and ease of repair The field of ten semi-finalists made special presentations to the Mural Committee and was then narrowed to four finalists. In January 1995, per the selection process plan, Design Architect Ricardo Legorreta reviewed the proposals and models of the four finalists and selected the Artist Team of victor Orozco Ochoa and John Neal Hill. An Information Item on the "Status of the Artist Selection Process for the South Chula vista Library Mural Project" (Attachment C) was sent to Council on February 2, 1995. 2"'~ Item Meeting Date: r , Page ;! Mav 2. 1995 II. THE SELECTED ARTIST TEAM AND THEIR PROJECT The selected Artist Team of victor Orozco Ochoa and John Neal Hill has received training in the fields of art and architecture and has successfully worked on both sides of the Mexican border. A photograph of the Artist Team's conceptual design is attached (Attachment D). The Artist Team's model of the Project will be available from Friday, April 28th, until the Council meeting on May 2nd in the Council Offices. It will also be available in front of the dais at the City Council meeting on May 2, 1995. Slides of victor Ochoa's previous projects as well as the proposed mural project for the South Chula vista Library are available from the Chula vista Library. Also, a twenty-minute video of the proposed mural project made by victor Ochoa and John Hill at the Semi-Finalist's Presentations on November 7, 1994 is available. (To preview either the slides or the video contact: Nora McMartin, 691-5161). VICTOR OROZCO OCHOA is respected as a Chicano muralist whose public art during the past twenty-five years often involved students of all ages. As a co-founder of Centro Cultural de la Raza and a former member of the Public Arts Advisory Board, Mr. Ochoa has fabricated over sixty-five public murals since 1970 (including a local mural project with the Kellogg Elementary School). His most recent contract (completed in March 1995) was with the San Diego Commission of Arts and Culture for a project in San Ysidro involving the San Ysidro Middle School. JOHN NEAL HILL, owner of the Design Studio, graduated from the New School of Architecture in San Diego. He worked on the restoration of the Transportation Mural at the new Aerospace Museum and most recently worked on the "Locomotion" project for the Children's Museum in San Diego as well as the San Ysidro project, "Tree of Life", with victor Ochoa. The mural as designed by the Artist Team of Ochoa and Hill will cover approximately 750 sq. ft. on the east wall of the Children's story Hour Room at the South Chula vista Library and will have interlocking puzzle pieces designed in the shape of children. As they touch each other, the colors change symbolizing a bond of friendship between different ethnic groups and cultures. The materials used to wrap the puzzle pieces will be natural earth materials: textured sand, glass beads, copper and brass. Ethnic artists from the community who have prior experience working with students will involve ~;J Item Meeting Date: ~ , Page .1 Mav 2. 1995 children from the The Artist Team product, shield, access. local schools will provide or materials in the fabrication process. an anti-vandalism coating durable enough for public Ricardo Legorreta strongly felt that, of the four finalists, the Ochoa/Hill project was the most compatible with his architectural design and reflective of the theme of the building. He also liked the team's concept for involving community youth in the project's execution. III. THE CONTRACT The proposed agreement (Attachment E) for the design and execution of the Mural Project uses the City'S standard two- party agreement. Under this contract the artist team of victor Orozco Ochoa and John Neal Hill agree to perform the "Scope of Work" as outlined in Attachment E. This section details what is required of the team during the design, pre- construction and construction phases of the project. The project fabrication phase will begin on-site in May 1995 with preliminary design and mural layout (approximately two- three weeks), rental of the warehouse, purchase of materials, partial hiring of staff, etc. The anticipated completion of the off-site construction of the panels and framework and preliminary design layout will be June, 1995. July will be the anticipated delivery date for the puzzle pieces fabricated by students and artists. The anticipated completion of the mural, delivery to the site, and the on-site installation and colorization of mural panels will be August 1995. The final documentation phase and anticipated completion date will be September 1995. The $46,821 Project shall conform to the design approved by the Design Architect, Ricardo Legorreta, with two minor changes to the mural: 1. The elimination of the stained glass window, and 2. A modification in portion of the representative of the book design (located in mural) so that it would children's books the upper be more These changes are very small and will not change the original integrity, design or overall appearance of the mural project. The city will have the right to inspect both off-site and on- site fabrication locations and observe the work in progress at reasonable intervals by appointment with the Artist Team. 7~i Item Meeting Date: ~, Page .2. Mav 2. 1995 Payment may be withheld if the City is not satisfied with the Project and/or its progress. The city's acceptance of the Documentation Phase shall constitute completion of the project. The artists agree to waive all rights arising from the "California Art Preservation Act: (Civil Code section 987 et seq.) and the "Visual Artists' Rights Act of 1990" (17 U.S.C. section 101 et. seq.) Attachment F This gives the City all rights of ownership, possession and control. The artists will retain all rights under the Copyright Act of 1976 (17 U.S.C. section 101 et. seq.). The agreement, however, grants to the City license to make reproductions of the artwork for noncommercial purposes including reproductions used in city business, including posters, catalogs, souvenirs, photographs, etc. The Artist Team will have the first right of refusal for repairs and maintenance of the project with price approval by ci ty. Although this is a deviation from the normal consultant selection process, it will ensure the integrity of the artist's project. This agreement includes Retention will be retained services provided. a twenty percent retention. until the final acceptance of the FISCAL IMPACT: The $46,821 allocated for the art work is a specific line item in the Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act grant received by the City of Chula vista to construct the South Chula vista Library. Under the grant, 65% of the costs ($30,434) are paid by the State and 35% ($16,387) are paid by the city. The funds were appropriated in the capital Improvement Program LB125. /JrrlJ(!.HHE-t.Jrs ~ -.B-(!-D /\/07'" Se/f~AJ€j) 'lJ -- ~ ! o-t; RESOLUTION NO. / ?8'8".3 RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA APPROVING A CONTRACTUAL AGREEMENT WITH ARTIST TEAM VICTOR OROZCO OCHOA AND JOHN NEAL HILL FOR THE SOUTH CHULA VISTA LIBRARY PUBLIC ART MURAL PROJECT WHEREAS, The California Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act grant budget for the South Chula vista Library includes $46,821 (one percent of the construction budget) for works of art; and WHEREAS, early in the design stage it was determined that this money would be used for the creation of a large scale mural in the Children's Story Hour Room; and WHEREAS, the artist selection process has now been completed and an agreement negotiated; and WHEREAS, under the grant, 65% of the costs ($30,434) are paid by the State and 35% ($16,387) are paid by the city. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED the city council of the City of Chula vista does hereby approve the contractual agreement with the Artist Team of victor Orozco Ochoa and John Neal Hill for the execution of the Public Art Mural Project in the Children's Story Hour Room at the new South Chula vista Library, based on the theme of "International Friendship and Understanding", a copy of which is on file in the office of the City Clerk as Document No. (to be completed by the City Clerk in the final document). BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Mayor of the City of Chula vista is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Agreement for and on behalf of the City of C la vist David Palmer, Library Director " ~1 f:O Presented by c: \rs\ochoa.art ~-7 / %-;2;)- ATTACHMENT A COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT ITEM MEETING DATE March 8. 1994 ITEM TITLE: Report on the Artist Selection Process for the Public Art at the South Chula vista Library SUBMITTED BY: Library Director Parks and Recreation Director REVIEWED BY: city Manager (4/5ths Vote: Yes___No-X-) Council Referral # The California Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act grant budget for the South Chula vista Library includes $46,821 (one percent of the construction budget) for works of art. The City currently has a percentage set aside program for public art within redevelopment areas, but there is no City-wide public art/selection policy. The CuI tural Arts Commission has been charged with eventually developing such a policy, but it does not appear that the policy can be formalized within a time frame compatible with the new library construction. The City's contract with the architectural firm of LPA calls for the architect to select works of art for the new library. After discussions with the Cultural Arts Commission it became apparent that there should be some public process in the artist selection. Therefore, it is proposed that the City's Consultant Administrative Guidelines be used as a model for the artist selection process. RECOMMENDATION: That Council accept the report outlining the process to select an artist to execute a public art mural in the Children's Story Hour Room at the new South Chula vista Library based on the theme of "International Friendship and Understanding." BOARD/COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION: The Library Board of Trustees, on January 23, 1994, and the Cultural Arts commission, on February 8, 1994, voted to support the recommended artist selection process (ATTACHMENTS A and B). DISCUSSION: In November, after months of discussion with the architects and the State Library, the Project Team identified the Children's story Hour Room as an ideal location for the work of art called for in the project budget. Further it was proposed that the art work be a mural of approximately 750 square feet that will entirely cover the room's principal wall. The story Hour Room was chosen because of the desire by the Project Team to make that room a very special place with warmth and appeal to children of all ages. Although the Construction Bond Act allows for a one percent set aside for art, it does not it does not specify interior versus exterior placement. rg- -- 'l ITEM , PAGE 2 MEETING DATE, 3/8/93 Design architect Ricardo Legorreta has proposed that an artist design a mural for the story Hour Room and then involve the children of the community to assist with the painting of the panels before they are hung on the wall. "International friendship and understanding" has been selected as the subject matter in light of the bi-cultural, bi-national theme of this library. The wide ranging nature of this theme should allow artists considerable artistic freedom in selecting and executing a specific design. Although the city's contract with the project architect, LPA, Inc. calls for the architect (Ricardo Legorreta) to select the art, it was clear that a mechanism was needed to solicit artists. In December the Library Director attended the Cultural Arts Commission meeting to discuss this issue and at that meeting some Arts Commissioners suggested that there be a more formal public selection process. In response, the Library Director and Felicia Shaw, the city's Cultural Arts Coordinator have identified the Consultant Services Guidelines as a probable model for a selection process. This concept has been taken to both the Library Board of Trustees and the Cultural Arts Commission for their approval. Under this plan: * The City's Cultural Arts Coordinator will assist the Library with the development of an RFQ for the design of the mural and for coordination of the artist selection process. * A workshop for prospective artists will be conducted during the RFQ phase. * Five names will be sent to the City Manager for his consideration in naming a Artist Selection Committee. * The Cultural Arts Commission will nominate two names. * The Library Board of Trustees will nominate two names (one of which will be selected by the Board of the Friends of the Chula vista Public Library). * The Cultural Arts Coordinator and the Library Director will jointly nominate the fifth name. * The City Manager will formally appoint the Selection Committee. 2" -) tJ ITEM , PAGE 3 MEETING DATE, 3/8/94 * The Selection Committee will be charged with reviewing all responses to the RFQ and select seven to ten proposals for further review. This number may be revised based upon the number of submittals received. * The selected artists will make formal presentations to the Selection Committee. * Following these presentations the Selection Committee will recommend three artists to the Architect. * After his review, the Architect will numerically rank the three finalists. * The Library will then attempt to negotiate a contract with the number one ranked finalist. * City Council will then be asked to award a contract to the selected artist. FISCAL IMPACT: The $46,821 allocated for the art work is a specific line item in the Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act grant received by the City of Chula vista to construct the South Chula vista Library. Under the grant, 65% of the costs are paid by the State and 35% are paid by the City. The funds were appropriated in the FY 1993-94 Capital Improvement Program. g-// ATTACHMENT A Library Board of Trustees - 2 - January 26, 1994 2. Works of Art Director Palmer informed the Trustees that one percent of the South Chula vista Library's construction costs (approximately $47,000) has been earmarked for works of art; 65% of which is funded by the State. The contract with the architect specifies that the architect will select the artist for any art work in the building. The art work would be commissioned to make the Children's room area more attractive and inviting to children. Architect Ricardo Legorreta proposed the Library commission an artist to design and produce a mural that would then, under artist supervision, be painted by children in the community. Director Palmer informed the Trustees that Mr. Legorreta had commissioned a mural such as this for a world class children's museum he designed in Mexico city and that the examples of this art work were outstanding. Mr. Palmer discussed the mural concept with LPA staff, Felicia Shaw, Chula vista's Arts Coordinator, and Gale Goldman, Public Arts Coordinator for the City of San Diego. Further, Ms. Shaw has applied for a grant with the San Diego Community Foundation to obtain additional funds for administrative costs associated with this project. Director Palmer attended an Arts Commission meeting to ask for help in identifying artists for this project. Based upon commissioner's comments from that meeting, Library staff agreed that a public art selection process be put into place. Mr. Palmer then turned the meeting over to Felicia Shaw, Chula vista's Arts Coordinator, to provide details of the proposed public art selection process. Ms. Shaw explained that public art has become very controversial. Communities demand that art placed in their neighborhoods and facilities be reflective of local sentiments. Therefore, it is important that the public be allowed a role in selecting the artist and theme for a piece of public art. The city of Chula vista currently has no public art selection policy. Ms. Shaw proposed that Chula vista's administrative guidelines for selecting a consultant for contracts $25,000 and above be used 2" --- / .;L Library Board of Trustees - 3 - January 26, 1994 in place of a formal policy. These guidelines specify that the City Manager appoint a selection committee of three to five qualified individuals. This committee will review the proposals and make a selection. Ms. Shaw further proposed that a proj ect Coordinator be hired to coordinate and follow through on the selection process, which is expected to take six months. (Trustee Clover Byrum arrived at 4 PM) This process will be open to any artist. Ms. Shaw gave the Trustees an overview of the preliminary art selection process that staff is recommending. Proposed Public Art Selection Process: a. Develop a request for proposal (RFP) . Determine the product desired, artist's qualifications, and how the artist should respond to the request for proposal. b. Appoint a selection commi ttee. Ms. Shaw recommended a committee of five individuals: two appointed by the Library Board, one of which could be solicited from the Friends of the Library; two appointed by the Cultural Arts Commission and one, who is a professional in the field, appointed by Mr. Palmer and Ms. Shaw. Director Palmer reminded the Board that the City Manager will formally appoint members to this committee, the names presented to him are, in effect, nominees. c. Release information to the public through press releases and flyers. d. Conduct a workshop to help the artists put their proposals together. e. Deadline and acceptance of RFP's. Copies of which will be sent to the selection committee. f. The selection committee will meet to narrow the RFP's to an approximate number (10). g. The selection committee will meet again to narrow the RFP's to the final three. h. The final RFP's will then be sent to the architect for selection according to contract. i. The architect's choice will be submitted to the city Manager and city Council for approval. Director Palmer asked the Trustees for comments and also asked their support of the public arts Y~/J Library Board of Trustees - 4 - January 26, 1994 selection process as proposed and the selection of committee members. MSC (Williams/Donovan) to approve the public arts process as explained by Felicia Shaw (4-0-1 Trustee Alexander absent) MSC (Williams/Donovan) recommend that one member of the Library Board of Trustees and one member of the Friends of the ~ibrary be appointed to the selection committee (3-0-2 Trustee Alexander and Trustee Clover Byrum absent). This item will be placed on formalize the Trustee's committee. the February agenda to selections to this 3. Furniture and Equipment Director Palmer reported that the bid document for furniture, stacks and signage is near completion and may go out as early as next week. Receipt and award of bid is estimated to take place in April or May with delivery scheduled by mid- September or mid-October. Interior Designer Marshall Brown has verified his cost estimates for the furniture on five different occasions and is very confident that furnishings and shelving will fall within budget. The carpet proposed by the contractor did not meet bid specifications. To purchase carpeting that complies with bid specifications the Library will transfer $35,000 from the contingency budget. Because this change order is over $25,000, it will require City Council approval. MSC (Donovan/Williams) that the Library Board supports the use of monies from the contingency fund in the amount of $35,000 be used to meet the requirements in the original specifications for the carpet. (4-0-1 Alexander absent) 4. opening Date The architect predicts that construction of the new library will be completed by October. It is proposed that the grand opening will be held during the first week of December. g'~ /1 ATTACHMENT B Cultural Arts Commission Meetings Minutes 2 February 8, 1994 commissioner McAllister nominated and Mr. Pelayo accepted to take the lead in organizing the booth at the Festival. C. Communication with SUHSD Facility Eastlake Performing Arts The Sub-Committee Chair was directed by the Commission to approach Eastlake High School to discuss potential partnership with their new Performing Arts Facil i ty . Commissioner Souval negotiations was not very successful and no progress was made with the High School. Chair Cernitz suggested the possibility to facilitate the process by writing a formal communication to Council encouraging them to explore all possible options of a partnership with the City and Eastlake High School Mr. Gates read the original Council request. MSC (Souval/Pelayo) (Castillo/Torres) 6-0 to direct staff, with the Commission's assistance, to prepare a letter encouraging the Council to continue pursuing arrangements for partnership of joint usage of the new Performing Arts Facility. Action a. Library Mural Project - The Commission discussed the presentation made by the Library at the past meeting. The Commission had a concern whether the process of developing a murals program was a public project or whether the architect had full authority in hiring an artist. Library Director Palmer outlined the process that the Library plans to implement in determining the mural project selection at the new South Chula vista Library. A proposal was presented to the Library Board and also to the Cultural Arts Commission. In lieu of a public art policy in the City (none exists in the City), the city has a city Ordinance Consultant Services Agreement. The City Manager will appoint a three to five member selection committee to serve in a selection process. Once a consultant has been appointed, five individuals will then serve on a selection committee. The Library Board and the Cultural Arts Commission were both asked to chose two individuals each to serve on the Committee. ?(r/~ Cultural Arts Commission Meetings Minutes 3 February 8, 1994 Mr. Pelayo noted the Commission should cooperate and help the Library move forward with the process, however there were concerns there is no public art policy in place. The Cultural Arts Commission has the ability to implement policy for Council approval. Mr. Palmer asked the Commission to have this item placed on the agenda for action to decide which commissioners will be nominated to serve on the Selection Committee. The final appointment of these nominees will be done by the City Manager. MS [Souval/Wheeland] 6-1 [Pelayo voted against, castillo/Torres absent] to approve the outlined procedure for the artist selection process in the new South Chula vista Library. Mr. McAllister requested Mr. Torres be notified. b. Retreat - The scheduled Retreat of January 29, 1994 was canceled. A new date was set for March 12, 1994 at Eastlake Library. 3. NEW BUSINESS - Action a. Communication with Southwestern College MSC [Wheeland/Souval] (Castillo/Torres absent) 6-0 to direct staff to assist in drafting a letter on behalf of the Commission to the Mayor and Council encouraging them to contact Southwestern College and suggest the College consider the use of the College Facilities by the community. b. supplemental Budget Request - Cultural Arts Coordinator and Conferences MSC [Souval/Pelayo] (Castillo/Torres) 6-0 to move forward with the two supplemental budget requests including the Cultural Arts Coordinator to a full-time position and request funding to attend the annual NALLA Conference. The Commission will need to draft the justification in report form. The Commission will forward the information for staff to put into Supplemental Budget Request Report form. '6~/~ ~v~ ::~~ ~.-...;~.-....; ~~~~ ATTACHMENT B C1lY OF CHULA VISfA CALL TO ARTISTS South Chula Vista Library Mural Project Request for Qualifications STATEMENT OF INTENT The City of Chula Vista is seeking an artist or a team of artists to create a mural at the South Chula Vista Library (currently under construction) on the corner of Fourth and Orange Avenues. The mural stte is a 750-square foot wall in the Children's Story Hour Room. THE SITE Intended to reflect the City's strong combination of Anglo and Hispanic influences, the Library design will incorporate the best elements of contemporary Mexican architecture combined wtth simple sculptural forms and contrasting bright colors. Located in the ctty of Chula Vista, four miles from the Mexican border, the $12.7 million, 37,000 square- foot library will be a facility dedicated to a bicultural concept of library service. The prominent location of the library and a design by noted archttect Ricardo Leggorreta will signal a new era in library service for the residents of this City. Library users will have access to the latest media and electronic information resources, as well as a bilingual book collection that will ultimately number 178,000 items. The building will have a variety of functions and spaces responding to the needs and interests of the south Chula Vista community including a number of special browsing areas such as the Children's Room, quiet study rooms and a Technology User's Center which will house a public access computer lab. The Library also will become home to the Itteracyoffice which will provide tutoring space and a resource library. In addition, there will be a meeting room complex featuring a 1 DO-seat flat-floored multi-purpose room, a twenty-five seat conference room, a small bookstore/cafe and a large exhibition/gallery space. THE CHALLENGE The artwork must: . be based on a theme of international friendship and understanding . involve children in the design and/or fabrication process . appeal to children . require low maintenance and be easy to repair . be respectful of the existing architecture X II ".,- / I (../ / l THE BUDGET The total budget for the project is $46,821. This sum must include the artist's design fee, the costs of fabricating, transporting and installing the work, as well as travel, insurance and all other expenses associated with the project. ELIGIBILITY The project is open to all professional artists who may work alone or coll~borate as a team. Failure to comply with the requirements described in this RFQ will constitute an invalid statement of qualifications. SELECTION PROCESS AND CRITERIA A five-member panel composed of arts professionals knowledgeable in the field of public art, as well as members of the community, will evaluate each applicant's statement and qualifications and select the semi-finalists to prepare proposals for the project. The semi-finalists will be given a tour of the site and will be provided all blueprints and specifications necessary for their proposals. Semi-finalists will also receive a copy of "A Chula Vista Community Profile", a compilation of statements shared by community members during a focus group discussion on the library mural project. Semi-finalists will be encouraged to explore Chula Vista's and the border region's local character, social dynamics and cultural history. Each semi-finalist will receive a $100 proposal development honorarium. Teams should designate a representative, as the honorarium will only be paid to one person. Each semi-finalist artist or team will make a formal public presentation prior to the panel review and selection meeting. The panel will consider the proposals and select no more than three artists or team finalists based on the criteria of previous work, technical qualifications and ability to meet the project requirements. The project architect, Ricardo Leggoretta, will select the winning proposal from the three finalists. The City reserves the right to reject all proposals. TIME LINE . Community focus group meeting Thursday, September 8 - 7:00 p.m. . Deadline for submittal of qualifications Friday, September 16, 1994 - 5:00 p.m. . Notification of semi-finalists Thursday, October 13 . Semi-finalists' tour of site Monday, October 17 - 3:30 p.m. . Proposal deadline Wednesday, October 26 - 5:00 p.m. . Semi-finalists' public presentations Wednesday, October 26 - 6:30 p.m. . Panel review and selection meeting Thursday, October 27 - 5:30 p.m. . Project finalists announced Friday, October 28 . Project architect review & selection Friday, November 11 . Notification of artist(s) Monday, November 14 Note: Dates are subject to change, with the exception of the deadline for submittal of qualifications. DEADLINE Acclications must be hand delivered or mailed in time to be received bv Fridav, Sectember 16. 1994 at 5:00 c.m. Acclications hand delivered or costmarked after this date will not be eliaible. )?' -/ K c~ ! __"' SUBMITTAL REQUIREMENTS Artists submitting individually or as a team should prepare the application materials and submit them as ONE package. Do not bind or staple material. Each application package must include: . A typed letter of interest describing each artist's past experience, the approach envisioned for the project and the means that might be used to execute it (two pages maximum). . A current resume for each artist with emphasis on public art experience and public or private commissions. Please include a list of past clients, projects am! references. . Re<,;umes and background information on non-artist team members who would assist with the project. . Up to ten (10) 35mm slides of relevant work, presented in a 9x11" plastic slide sheet and identified with the artist's name. Each slide must be numbered: the TOP of the slide must be indicated as such. . An annotated typewritten slide list referencing the slides by number and including date, medium, dimensions and location of work. . Any other materials such as catalogues, video tapes, etc. which might aid the selection panel with the understanding of the artist's work: all additional materials must be clearly labeled. . A se~-addressed stamped envelope for the return of slides and other materials. The City of Chula Vista Cultural Arts Commission will retain copies of resumes and letters for its permanent file. The City is not responsible for the loss or damage of slides. Original artwork will not be accepted. Applications are to be mailed or hand delivered to: The City of Chula Vista Parks and Recreation Department Attn: Felicia Shaw, Cultural Arts Coordinator 276 Fourth'Avenue Chula Vista, CA 91910 SELECTION PANELISTS Patricio Chavez, Visual Arts Curator Centro Cultural de Ia Raza Doris Steinman, Member Chula Vista Friends of the Library Constance Clover-Byram, Member Chula Vista Library Board of Trustees Lee Wheeland, Commissioner City of Chula Vista Cultural Arts Commission Dency Souval, Commissioner City of Chula Vista Cultural Arts Commission CONTACTS AND QUESTIONS Any questions regarding the project or the site are to be referred to Felicia Shaw, Cultural Arts Coordinator, at (619) 691-5071 or Nora McMartin, Principal Librarian, at (619) 691-5161. CONSTRUCTION OF THIS LIBRARY IS FUNDED IN PART BY A CALIFORNIA LIBRARY CONSTRUCTION AND RENOVATION BOND ACT- GRANT FROM THE STATE OF CAUFORNIA \e- ;,,' ,...r -/ -; 1/'. / This view is of one end of the Children's Room. On the opposite end, the mural site is a 750 sq. ft, 2-story arched wall with a narrow, vertical slot window and built-in bench at the base. Please note: There is no public access to the construction site. Special arrangements can be made to view a video of the library and mural location by contacting Nora McMartin at 591-5161. \/ ...., F: ~1 ..- 7-"<- / o ~6 ~6 'rt'J 'BIS!^ Bln4'J 188JlS.::l 998 AJe.lq!l O!)qnd BIS!^ Bln4'J SOUTH CHULA VISTA LIBRARY Attachment C INFORMATION ITEM DATE: February 2, 1995 The Honorable Mayor and city council TO: FROM: John Goss, City Manager David Palmer, Library Director ~ VIA: SUBJECT: Status of artist selection process for the South Chula Vista Library Mural Project The seven month long artist selection process for the South Chula Vista Library story Hour Room mural has now concluded. The Artist Selection Committee, chaired by Dency Souval with members Lee Wheeland, Constance Clover-Byram, Doris Steiman;' and patricio Chavez held numerous public committee meetings as well as a community input forum. Based upon a set of criteria, the field of forty-six applicants was narrowed to ten semi-finalists and ul timately to four finalists. In January 1995, per the artist selection plan, Design Architect Ricardo Legorreta reviewed the proposals of the four finalists and selected the team of Victor Ochoa and Neil Hill. A standard two party agreement between the artists and the City of Chula vista is currently being finalized. The contract, with a more detailed Agenda Statement, wi~l be bought to the City Council for approval in mid to late February. If the agreement is approved, it is anticipated that work on the project can begin by early March. J-~;;LI <:::>-_ .-') 'I o !~ v-- Attachment D ! ~ ATTACHMENT E Parties and Recital Page(s) Agreement between City of Chula vista and victor Orozco Ochoa and John Neal Hill for fabricating a mural at the South Chula vista Library Children's Story Hour room This agreement, dated Mav 2. 1995 for the purposes of reference only, and effective as of the date last executed unless another date is otherwise specified in Exhibit A, Paragraph 1 is between the City-related entity as is indicated on Exhibit A, paragraph 2, as such ("city"), whose business form is set forth on Exhibit A, paragraph 3, and the entity indicated on the attached Exhibit A, paragraph 4, as Consultant, whose business form is set forth on Exhibit A, paragraph 5, and whose place of business and telephone numbers are set forth on Exhibit A, paragraph 6 ("Consultant"), and is made with reference to the following facts: Recitals . Whereas, the California Library Construction and Renovation Bond Act grant budget for the South Chula vista Library includes $46,821 (one percent of the construction budget) for works of art to be used for the creation of a large scale mural in the Children's Story Hour Room with 65% of the costs ($30,434) being paid by the Sta~e and 35% ($16,387) being paid by the City; and Whereas, the selected mural will have a theme of "international friendship and understanding", will be appropriate for existing South Chula vista architecture, will be sensitive to the region's cultural and social history, be easy to maintain and repair, and involve children in the design and/or fabrication process; and Whereas, the City's contract with the project architect, LPA, Inc., specified that the architectural team select the public art for the new library, a mechanism was needed to select the artist(s); and Whereas, the City Council approved an artist selection process for public art at the South Chula vista Library on March 8, 1995; and 2pty9.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Fourth Revision) . November 2, 1993 Page 1 ?f>~J I g -;;tf , Whereas, the city Manager approved the five-member Mural Selection committee to review the artist's proposals; and """ Whereas, the Mural Selection committee held numerous public meetings, as well as a Public Focus Group Meeting, to give the community an opportunity to share their vision of the mural and their ideas for student involvement; and Whereas, a Request for Qualifications was mailed to over 1,000 local artists; and Whereas, the Mural Selection committee narrowed the field of forty-six artists submitting proposals, through public committee meetings, to four finalists; and Whereas, Design Architect Ricardo Legorreta reviewed the four finalist's proposals and models and selected the mural proposal by Artist Team victor Orozco Ochoa and John Neal Hill, the city desires to retain the Artist Team of Ochoa and Hill to fabricate and install the mural project in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement; and Whereas, Consultant warrants and represents that they are experienced and staffed in a manner such that they are and can prepare and deliver the services required of Consultant to City within the time frames herein provided all in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement; ~ (End of Recitals. Next Page starts Obligatory Provisions.) 2pty9.wp Standard Form Two party Agreement (Fourth Revision) November 2, 1993 Page 2 ~ :?cl f Obligatory provisions Pages ... NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the City and Consultant do hereby mutually agree as follows: 1. Consultant's Duties A. General Duties Consultant shall perform all of the services described on the attached Exhibit A, Paragraph 7, entitled "General Duties"; and, B. Scope of Work and Schedule . In the process of performing and delivering said "General Duties", Consultant shall also perform all of the services described in Exhibit A, Paragraph 8, entitled" Scope of Work and Schedule", not inconsistent with the General Duties, according to, and within the time frames set forth in Exhibit A, Paragraph 8, and deliver to city such Deliverables as are identified in Exhibit A, Paragraph 8, within the time frames set forth therein, time being of the essence of this agreement. The General Duties and the work and deliverables required in the Scope of Work and Schedule shall be herein referred to as the "Defined Services". Failure to complete the Defined Services by the times indicated does not, except at the option of the city, operate to terminate this Agreement. . C. Reductions in Scope of Work City may independently, or upon request from Consultant, from time to time reduce the Defined Services to be performed by the Consultant under this Agreement. Upon doing so, City and Consultant agree to meet in good faith and confer for the purpose of negotiating a corresponding reduction in the compensation associated with said reduction. D. Additional Services In addition to performing the Defined Services herein set forth, city may require Consultant to perform additional consulting services related to the Defined Services ("Additional services"), and upon doing so in writing, if they are within the scope of services offered by Consultant, Consultant shall perform same on a time and materials basis at the rates set forth in the "Rate Schedule" in Exhibit A, Paragraph 11 (C), unless a separate fixed fee is otherwise agreed upon. All compensation for Additional Services shall be paid monthly as billed. . 2pty9.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Fourth Revision) November 2, 1993 Page 3 g"b / 5.;:;J{; E. Standard of Care Consultant, in performing any Services under this agreement, whether Defined Services or Additional Services, shall perform in a manner consistent with that level of care and skill ordinarily exercised by members of the profession currently practicing under similar conditions and in similar locations. '""'" F. Insurance Consultant represents that it and its agents, staff and subconsultants employed by it in connection with the Services required to be rendered, are protected against the risk of loss by the following insurance coverages, in the following categor- ies, and to the limits specified, policies of which are issued by Insurance Companies that have a Best's Rating of "A, Class V" or better, or shall meet with the approval of the city: Statutory Worker's Compensation Insurance and Employer's Liability Insurance coverage in the amount set forth in the attached Exhibit A, Paragraph 9. Commercial General Liability Insurance including Business Automobile Insurance coverage in the amount set forth in Exhibit A, Paragraph 9, combined single limit applied separately to each project away from premises owned or rented by Consultant, which names City and Applicant as an Additional Insured, and which is primary to any policy which the City may otherwise carry ~ ("primary Coverage"), and which treats the employees of the City and Applicant in the same manner as members of the general public ("Cross-liability Coverage"). Errors and-Omissions insurance, in the amount set forth in Exhibit A, Paragraph 9, unless Errors and Omissions coverage is included in the General Liability policy. G. Proof of Insurance Coverage. (1) certificates of Insurance. Consultant shall demonstrate proof of coverage herein required, prior to the commencement of services required under this Agreement, by delivery of certificates of Insurance demonstrating same, and further indicating that the policies may not be canceled without at least thirty (30) days written notice to the Additional Insured. 2pty9.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Fourth Revision) November 2, 1993 Page 4 ......... 3 r ;2/? . (2) Policy Endorsements Required. In order to demonstrate the Additional Insured coverage, Primary coverage and Cross-liability Coverage required under Consultant's commercial General Liability Insurance Policy, Consultant shall deliver a policy endorsement to the city demonstrating same, which shall be reviewed and approved by the Risk Manager. H. Securitv for Performance. (1) Performance Bond. In the event that Exhibit A, at Paragraph 19, indicates the need for Consultant to provide a Performance Bond (indicated by a check mark in the parenthetical space immediately preceding the subparagraph entitled "Performance Bond"), then Consultant shall provide to the city a performance bond by a surety and in a form and amount satisfactory to the Risk Manager or City Attorney which amount is indicated in the space adjacent to the term, "Performance Bond", in said Paragraph 19, Exhibit A. (2) Letter of Credit. . In the event that Exhibit A, at Paragraph 19, indicates the need for Consultant to provide a Letter of Credit (indicated by a check mark in the parenthetical space immediately preceding the subparagraph entitled "Letter of Credit"), then Consultant shall provide to the city an irrevocable letter of credit callable by the City at their unfettered discretion by Submitting to the bank a letter, signed by the city Manager, stating that the Consultant is in breach of the terms of this Agreement. The letter of credit shall be issued by a bank, and be in a form and amount satisfactory to the Risk Manager or City Attorney which amount is indicated in the space adjacent to the term, "Letter of credit", in said Paragraph 19, Exhibit A. (3) Other Security In the event that Exhibit A, at Paragraph 19, indicates the need for Consultant to provide security other than a Performance Bond or a Letter of Credit (indicated by a check mark in the parenthetical space immediately preceding the subparagraph entitled "Other Security"), then Consultant shall provide to the city such other security therein listed in a form and amount satisfactory to the Risk Manager or city Attorney. . 2pty9.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Fourth Revision) November 2, 1993 Page 5 % ~d- 7 /.6 ~.;;.6 1. Business License """" Consultant agrees to obtain a business license from the city and to otherwise comply with Title 5 of the Chula vista Municipal Code. 2. Duties of the city A. Consultation and Cooperation City shall regularly consult the Consultant for the purpose of reviewing the progress of the Defined Services and Schedule therein contained, and to provide direction and guidance to achieve the objectives of this agreement. The city shall permit access to its office facilities, files and records by Consultant throughout the term of the agreement. In addition thereto, City agrees to provide the information, data, items and materials set forth on Exhibit A, Paragraph 10, and with the further understanding that delay in the provision of these materials beyond 30 days after authorization to proceed, shall constitute a basis for the justifiable delay in the Consultant's performance of this agreement. B. Compensation Upon receipt of a properly prepared billing from Consultant ~ submitted to the City periodically as indicated in Exhibit A, Paragraph 18, but in no event more frequently than monthly, on the day of the period indicated in Exhibit A, Paragraph 18, City shall compensate Consultant for all services rendered by Consult- ant according to the terms and conditions set forth in Exhibit A, Paragraph 11, aajacent to the governing compensation relationship indicated by a "checkmark" next to the appropriate arrangement, subject to the requirements for retention set forth in paragraph 19 of Exhibit A, and shall compensate Consultant for out of pocket expenses as provided in Exhibit A, Paragraph 12. All billings submitted by Consultant shall contain sufficient information as to the propriety of the billing to permit the city to evaluate that the amount due and payable thereunder is proper, and shall specifically contain the City's account number indicated on Exhibit A, Paragraph 18 (C) to be charged upon making such payment. 3. Administration of Contract Each party designates the individuals ("Contract Administrators") indicated on Exhibit A, Paragraph 13, as said party's contract administrator who is authorized by said party to represent them in the routine administration of this agreement. 2pty9.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Fourth Revision) November 2, 1993 Page 6 ? / ..L~ """ . 4. Term. This Agreement shall terminate when the Parties have complied with all executory provisions hereof. 5. Liquidated Damages The provisions of this section apply if a Liquidated Damages Rate is provided in Exhibit A, Paragraph 14. It is acknowledged by both parties that time is of the essence in the completion of this Agreement. It is difficult to estimate the amount of damages resulting from delay in per- formance. The parties have used their judgment to arrive at a reasonable amount to compensate for delay. Failure to complete the Defined Services within the allotted time period specified in this Agreement shall result in the following penalty: For each consecutive calendar day in excess of the time specified for the completion of the respective work assignment or Deliverable, the consultant shall pay to the city, or have withheld from monies due, the sum of Liquidated Damages Rate provided in Exhibit A, Paragraph 14 ("Liquidated Damages Rate") . . Time extensions for delays beyond the co~sultant's control, other than delays caused by the City, shall be requested in writing to the City's Contract Administrator, or designee, prior to the expiration of the specified time. Extensions of time, when granted, will be based upon the effect of delays to the work and will not be granted for delays to minor portions of work unless it can be shown that such delays did or will delay the progress of the work. 6. Financial Interests of Consultant A. Consultant is Designated as an FPPC Filer. If Consultant is designated on Exhibit A, Paragraph 15, as an "FPPC filer", Consultant is deemed to be a "Consultant" for the purposes of the Political Reform Act conflict of interest and disclosure provisions, and shall report economic interests to the City Clerk on the required Statement of Economic Interests in such reporting categories as are specified in Paragraph 15 of Exhibit A, or if none are specified, then as determined by the city Attorney. . 2pty9.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Fourth Revision) November 2, 1993 Page 7 ~~;<r /6-30 B. Decline to Participate. Regardless of whether Consultant is designated as an FPPC Filer, Consultant shall not make, or participate in making or in any way attempt to use Consultant's position to influence a governmental decision in which Consultant knows or has reason to know Consultant has a financial interest other than the compensation promised by this Agreement. ~ C. Search to Determine Economic Interests. Regardless of whether Consultant is designated as an FPPC Filer, Consultant warrants and represents that Consultant has diligently conducted a search and inventory of Consultant's economic interests, as the term is used in the regulations promulgated by the Fair Political Practices Commission, and has determined that Consultant does not, to the best of Consultant's knowledge, have an economic interest which would conflict with Consultant's duties under this agreement. D. Promise Not to Acquire Conflicting Interests. Regardless of whether Consultant is designated as an FPPC Filer, Consultant further warrants and represents that Consultant will not acquire, obtain, or assume an economic interest during the term of this Agreement which would consti~ute a conflict of interest as prohibited by the Fair Political Practices Act. ~ E. Duty to Advise of Conflicting Interests. Regardless of whether Consultant is designated as an FPPC Filer, Consulta~t further warrants and represents that Consultant will immediately advise the City Attorney of city if Consultant learns of an economic interest of Consultant's which may result in a conflict of interest for the purpose of the Fair Political Practices Act, and regulations promulgated thereunder. F. Specific Warranties Against Economic Interests. Consultant warrants and represents that neither Consultant, nor Consultant's immediate family members, nor Consultant's employees or agents ("Consultant Associates") presently have any interest, directly or indirectly, whatsoever in any property which may be the subject matter of the Defined Services, or in any property within 2 radial miles from the exterior boundaries of any property which may be the subject matter of the Defined Services, ("Prohibited Interest"), other than as listed in Exhibit A, Paragraph 15. 2pty9.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Fourth Revision) November 2, 1993 Page 8 ""'"' 2(> J!J . . . Consultant further warrants and represents that no promise of future employment, remuneration, consideration, gratuity or other reward or gain has been made to Consultant or Consultant Associates in connection with Consultant's performance of this Agreement. Consultant promises to advise city of any such promise that may be made during the Term of this Agreement, or for 12 months thereafter. - Consultant agrees that Consultant Associates shall not acquire any such Prohibited Interest within the Term of this Agreement, or for 12 months after the expiration of this Agreement, except with the written permission of City. Consultant may not conduct or solicit any business for any party to this Agreement, or for any third party which may be in conflict with Consultant's responsibilities under this Agreement, except with the written permission of city. 7. Hold Harmless Consultant shall defend, indemnify, protect and hold harmless the City, its elected and appointed officers and employees, from and against all claims for damages, liability, cost and expense (including without limitation attorneys' fees) arising out of the conduct of the Consultant, or any agent or employee, subcontractors, or others in connec~ion with the execution of the work covered by this Agreement, except only for those claims arising from the sole negligence or sole willful conduct of the City, its officers, or employees. Consultant's indemnification shall include any and all costs, expenses, attorneys' fees. and liability incurred by the city, its officers, agents, or employees in defending against such claims, whether the same proceed to judgment or not. Further, Consultant at its own expense shall, upon written request by the City, defend any such suit or action brought against the City, its officers, agents, or employees. Consultants' indemnification of City shall not be limited by any prior or subsequent declaration by the Consultant. 8. Termination of Agreement for Cause If, through any cause, Consultant shall fail to fulfill in a timely and proper manner Consultant's obligations under this Agreement, or if Consultant shall violate any of the covenants, agreements or stipulations of this Agreement, City shall have the right to terminate this Agreement by giving written notice to Consultant of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof at least five (5) days before the effective date of such termination. In that event, all finished or unfinished documents, data, studies, surveys, drawings, maps, reports and other 2pty9.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Fourth Revision) November 2, 1993 Page 9 8'~)/ / g '32.- materials prepared by Consultant shall, at the option of the City, become the property of the City, and Consultant shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any work satisfactorily completed on such documents and other materials up to the effective date of Notice of Termination, not to exceed the amounts payable hereunder, and less any damages caused City by Consultant's breach. ......, 9. Errors and Omissions In the event that the City Administrator determines that the Consultants' negligence, errors, or omissions in the performance of work under this Agreement has resulted in expense to City greater than would have resulted if there were no such negligence, errors, omissions, Consultant shall reimburse City for any additional expenses incurred by the City. Nothing herein is intended to limit City's rights under other provisions of this agreement. 10. Termination of Agreement for Convenience of City City may terminate this Agreement at any time and for any reason, by giving specific written notice to Consultant of such termination and specifying the effective date thereof, at least thirty (30) days before the effective date of such termination. In that event, all finished and unfinished documents and other materials described hereinabove shall, at the option of the City, become city's sole and exclusive property. If the Agreement is terminated by city as provided in this paragraph, Consultant shall be entitled to receive just and equitable compensation for any satisfactor~ work completed on such documents and other materials to the effective date of such termination. Consultant hereby expressly waives any and all claims for damages or compensation arising under this Agreement except as set forth herein. ......, 11. Assignability The services of Consultant are personal to the City, and Consultant shall not assign any interest in this Agreement, and shall not transfer any interest in the same (whether by assignment or novation), without prior written consent of city. City hereby consents to the assignment of the portions of the Defined Services identified in Exhibit A, Paragraph 17 to the subconsultants identified thereat as "Permitted Subconsultants". 12. Ownership, PUblication, Reproduction and Use of Material All reports, studies, information, data, statistics, forms, designs, plans, procedures, systems and any other materials or 2pty9.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Fourth Revision) November 2, 1993 Page 10 -.. 2,'32 ------. _.,._,..~ . . . properties produced under this Agreement shall be the sole and exclusive property of city. No such materials or properties produced in whole or in part under this Agreement shall be subject to private use, copyrights or patent rights by Consultant in the united states or in any other country without the express written consent of city. City shall have unrestricted authority to publish, disclose (except as may be limited by the provisions of the Public Records Act), distribute, and otherwise use, copyright or patent, in whole or in part, any such reports, studies, data, statistics, forms or other materials or properties produced under this Agreement. 13. Independent Contractor City is interested only in the results obtained and Consultant shall perform as an independent contractor with sole control of the manner and means of performing the services required under this Agreement. city maintains the right only to reject or accept Consultant's work products. Consultant and any of the Consultant's agents, employees or representatives are, for all purposes under this Agreement, an independent contractor and shall not be deemed to be an employee of City, and none of them shall be entitled to any benefits to which City employees are entitled including but not limited to, overtime, retirement benefits, worker's compensation benefits, injury leave or other leave benefits. Therefore, city will not withhold state or federal income tax, social security tax or any other payroll tax, and Consultant shall be solely responsible for the payment of same and shall hold the city harmless with regard thereto. 14. Administrative Claims Requirements and Procedures No suit or arbitration shall be brought arising out of this agreement, against the City unless a claim has first been presented in writing and filed with the City and acted upon by the City in accordance with the procedures set forth in Chapter 1.34 of the Chula vista Municipal Code, as same may from time to time be amended, the provisions of which are incorporated by this reference as if fully set forth herein, and such policies and procedures used by the City in the implementation of same. Upon request by City, Consultant shall meet and confer in good faith with City for the purpose of resolving any dispute over the terms of this Agreement. 2pty9.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Fourth Revision) November 2, 1993 Page 11 2"-)) 1?~34 ~ 15. Attorney's Fees Should a dispute arising out of this Agreement result in litigation, it is agreed that the prevailing party shall be entitled to recover all reasonable costs incurred in the defense of the claim, including costs and attorney's fees. 16. Statement of Costs In the event that Consultant prepares a report or document, or participates in the preparation of a report or document in performing the Defined Services, Consultant shall include, or . cause the inclusion of, in said report or document, a statement of the numbers and cost in dollar amounts of all contracts and subcontracts relating to the preparation of the report or document. 17. Miscellaneous A. Consultant not authorized to Represent City Unless specifically authorized in writing by City, Consult- ant shall have no authority to act as City's agent to bind City to any contractual agreements whatsoever. ""'" B. Consultant is Real Estate Broker and/or Salesman If the box on Exhibit A, Paragraph 16 is marked, the Consultant and/or their principals is/are licensed with the State of California or some other state as a licensed real estate broker or salesperson. Otherwise, Consultant represents that neither Consultant, nor their principals are licensed real estate brokers or salespersons. C. Notices All notices, demands or requests provided for or permitted to be given pursuant to this Agreement must be in writing. All notices, demands and requests to be sent to any party shall be deemed to have been properly given or served if personally served or deposited in the united States mail, addressed to such party, postage prepaid, registered or certified, with return receipt requested, at the addresses identified herein as the places of business for each of the designated parties. D. Entire Agreement This Agreement, together with any other written document referred to or contemplated herein, embody the entire Agreement 2pty9.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Fourth Revision) November 2, 1993 Page 12 ""'" g<37 . . . and understanding between the parties relating to the subject matter hereof. Neither this Agreement nor any provision hereof may be amended, modified, waived or discharged except by an instrument in writing executed by the party against which enforcement of such amendment, waiver or discharge is sought. E. Capacity of Parties Each signatory and party hereto hereby warrants and represents to the other party that it has legal authority and capacity and direction from its principal to enter into this Agreement, and that all resolutions or other actions have been taken so as to enable it to enter into this Agreement. F. Governing Law/Venue This Agreement shall be governed by and construed in accordance with the laws of the state of California. Any action arising under or relating to this Agreement shall be brought only in the federal or state courts located in San Diego County, State of California, and if applicable, the City of Chula Vista, or as close thereto as possible. Venue for this Agreement, and performance hereunder, shall be the city of Chula Vista. [end of page. next page is signature page.] 2pty9.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Fourth Revision) November 2, 1993 Page 13 <;1>;35/ 8'-- 3~ Signature Page to Agreement between City of Chula Vista and Victor Orozco Ochoa and John Neal Hill ~ for South Chula Vista Library Mural Pro;ect IN WITNESS WHEREOF, city and Consultant have executed this Agreement thereby indicating that they have read and understood same, and indicate their full and complete consent to its terms: Dated: , 19 City of Chula Vista by: Shirley Horton, Mayor Attest: Beverly Authelet, city Clerk Approved as to form: ......, Bruce M. Boogaard, City Attorney By: ../;t6~5 rtist · z(g -1 !:> Dated: .. By. John N al Designer Exhibit List to Agreement ( Xl Exhibit A. ( l Exhibit B: 2pty9.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Fourth Revision) November 2, 1993 Page 14 --. fJ- J? " ~ Exhibit A to Agreement between City of Chula vista and [Name of Consultant] 1. Effective Date of Agreement: Mav 2. 1995 2. City-Related Entity: (X) city of Chula Vista, a municipal chartered corporation of the state of California () Redevelopment Agency of the city of Chula vista, a political subdivision of the state of California () Industrial Development Authority of the City of Chula Vista, a () Other: [insert business form] , a . ("city") 3. Place of Business for city: City of Chula vista, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 91910 4. Consultant: victor Orozco Ochoa and John Neal Hill also referred to herein as "Artist Team," 5. Business Form of Consultant: Jointly and severally ( ) Sole Proprietorship (X ) Partnership Verbal ( ) corporation 6. Place of Business, Telephone and Fax Number of Consultant: 2676 Broadway San Diego, California 92102 Voice Phone (619) 235-6135 x 14 or 239-4248 Fax Phone (619) 595-0034 . 2pty9.wp Standard Form Two Party Agreement (Fourth Revision) November 2, 1993 Page 1 g~)7/J~33 - .-- -_._---~~~~_..__."-- . ," ..' ""'" 7. General Duties: The consultants (referred to as Artist Team) shall design, fabricate and install a 750 sq. ft. mural, based on the theme of "International Friendship and Understanding", (referred to as Project), consistent with the design and model as depicted in the videotape made at the Semi- finalist's Presentations on 11/7/94, on the east wall of the South Chula vista Library's Story Hour Room with the following modifications: 1) there will be no stained glass window (the narrow vertical slot will have clear glass) 2) the book on the mural will be designed to look more like a children's book and less like a religious book The Project will have interlocking puzzle pieces designed in the shape of children. As they touch each other the colors will change symbolizing a bond of friendship between different ethnic groups and cultures. The materials used to wrap the puzzle pieces will be natural earth materials such as textured sand, glass beads, copper and brass. The Artist Team should make every effort possible to involve children in the design and/or fabrication process; create ""'" it so that it appeals to children; create it in a way that requires low maintenance and be easy to repair; and be respectful of the existing architecture. 8. Scope of Work and Schedule A. Detailed Scope of Work 1. Artist Team agrees to fabricate and install the South Chula vista Project as defined in #7 General Duties and shall provide the city with a work schedule indicating working days, dates and activities that the Artist Team reasonably believes will be required to install the Project. 2. In fulfilling its obligation under the Agreement, the Artist Team, its agents and employees shall comply with all Federal, State and City laws, ordinances, regulations and requirements which in any way affect the construction of the Project. 3. The Artist Team shall perform the services provided for herein in Artist Team's own way as an independent contractor and in pursuit of Artist Team's independent calling, and not as an employee of the city. Artist Team shall be under control ""'" 2PTY9-A.wp November 2, 1993 ?-- .1y Exhibit A to Standard Form Agreement Page 2 . 4. 5. . . 6. of the City only as to the result to be accomplished, but shall consult with the City as provided for in this in this agreement. The City shall not make any federal or state tax withholdings on behalf of the Artist Team. The city shall not be required to pay workers' compensation insurance on behalf of the Artist Team. The Artist Team agrees to indemnify the city for any tax, retirement contribution, social security, overtime payment, or workers' compensation payment which the city may be required to make on behalf of the Artist Team or any employee of the Artist Team for work done under this agreement. The Artist Team shall create the Project taking into consideration the safety of the public. The city shall have the right to inspect both off- site and on-site fabrication locations and observe the work in progress at reasonable intervals by appointment with the Artist Team. Payment may be withheld if the city is not satisfied with the Project and/or its progress. The City's acceptance of the Documentation Phase shall constitute completion of the project. The Project shall conform to the design approved by the Design Architect (with modifications listed in #7 General Duties). Should the Artist Team find it necessary to make any significant modification in the scope, design, color, size, material, utility or support ~equirements, or texture, the Artist Team shall submit in writing to the city for approval. Before the Artist Team may incorporate any significant modification in the Project, the Artist Team shall prepare drawings of the proposed changes for the city's approval. The City must then approve the changes in writing. A "significant modification" means any change which affects installation, scheduling, site preparation,maintenance or images of the Project as originally approved. The Artist Team represent and warrants, except as otherwise disclosed to the city in writing, in connection with the Artist Team's scope of work: 'a. The execution and fabrication of the Project shall be performed in a workmanlike manner. b. The project shall be free of defects in material and workmanship, including any defects consisting of "inherent vice" or 7. 8. 9. Exhibit A to standard Form Agreement Page 3 2PTY9-A.wp November 2, 1993 8""}; //-40 qualities which cause or accelerate deterioration of the mural. c. The warranty of quality and condition shall survive for a period of one year and after the final acceptance of the Project. The City shall give notice to the Artist Team of any observed breach with reasonable promptness. The Artist Team shall, at the request of the City, and at no cost to the City, cure reasonably and promptly the breach of any such warranty which is curable by the Artist Team and which cure is consistent with professional conservation standards (including, for example, cure by means of repair or refabrication of the Project). 10. Initial On-Site Fabrication Phase a. The initial on-site fabrication phase will begin in May 1995 with the preliminary design and mural layout (approximately two-three weeks), rental of the warehouse and equipment, purchase of materials and partial hiring of staff, etc. The anticipated completion date for this phase will be May 31, 1995. b. Throughout the on-site fabrication and installation phases the Artist Team will be responsible for covering and protecting the bench and carpet while working on the Project in the Children's story Hour Room. 11. Initial Off-site Fabrication Phase a. The initial off-site project fabrication phase will also begin in May 1995 with the construction of panels and framework and the completion of the preliminary design layout. The Artist Team will supply equipment for spraying heavy paint (compressor, extensions, spray guns, etc.). The anticipated completion date will be June 30, 1995. 12. Final Off-site Fabrication Phase a. The Artist Team will hire and coordinate a team of professional artists (representative of different ethnic groups), who have previous experience working with children, to go into the South Chula vista community and work with the children. The anticipated final off-site completion of the puzzle pieces by the students and artists will be July 31, 1995. 2PTY9-A.wp November 2, 1993 Exhibit A to Standard Form Agreement Page 4 g"/ IjtJ - ....-- _.. ..... ~. -..., -.. ~ . b. The Artist Team shall package, protect and transport all materials from the fabrication site to the installation site. 13. Final On-site Fabrication Phase a. The Artist Team will install the mural panels, caulk the joints, colorize and detail the mural and install lighting (per city approval). The anticipated completion of this phase will be August 31, 1995. b. The Artist Team shall submit to the City a recommended anti-vandalism coating product or shield that will protect the lower portion of the Project (with all costs to be within the project's budget) if the materials used are not deemed to be durable enough for public access. Upon approval, the Artist Team shall apply product (or shield) following the manufacturer's guidelines, at no additional costs to the city. 14. Pro;ect comoletion Phase a. The Artist Team will notify the City in writing at 365 F Street, Chula vista CA 91910, when the Project is installed. b. within eight (8) working days after the Artist Team notifies the city, the City shall submit written approval or denial of the On- site Installation Phase of the Project. c. city's acceptance of the On-Site Installation Phase shall constitute authority for the Artist Team to commence the Documentation Phase. d. The Artist Team shall clean up the property as may be reasonably requested by the city. Upon completion of the Project, the Artist Team shall remove all equipment and excess materials promptly and as requested by the Library. e. The Artist Team will be responsible for repairs not caused through acts of vandalism for one year following completion of the project. After the first year, for the lifetime of the Project, the City shall maintain and repair the project and shall have the right to determine if and when repairs or restorations to the Project are necessary. The Artist Team will have the first right of refusal for repairs and maintenance of the Project with price approval by city. . . 2PTY9-A.wp November 2, 1993 Exhibit A to Standard Form Agreement Page 5 g>'I/ /2-12-- 2PTY9-A.wp November 2, 1993 f. The Artist Team hereby acknowledges that the Project will be applied to the interior wall of the building and therefore its installation will subject the Project to destruction, mutilation or other modification by reason of removal. The Artist Team hereby waives any and all rights of ownership provided by 17 USC Section 106 A (a) (2) and (3). "WAIVER. The artist recognizes that he or she may have certain rights arising from the "California Art Preservation Act" (Civil Code 987 et seg.) or the "Visual Artists' Rights Act of 1990" (17 U.S.C. 101 et seg.). Those Acts require that a waiver of their provisions be expressly made in writing, Being fully informed, the artist and his or her agents, heirs, successors and assigns hereby waive any and all rights he or she may have under the provisions of the "California Art Preservation Act" (Civil Code 987 et seg.) or the "Visual Artists' Rights Act of 1990" (17 U.S.C. 101 et seg.). The artist, his or her agents, heirs, successors and assigns further agree not to attempt to defeat this waiver by cooperating, encouraging or assisting any organization which seeks to bring an action under these Acts." The Artist Team understands that the City has no obligation to notify the Artist Team of intention to remove, and the Artist Team does not have the right to remove the work or pay for its removal within 90 days of notice. The City shall have the right to graphically reproduce the art produced by the Artist Team provided that such reproduction is credited to the Artist Team per the California Art Preservation Act Copyright Law. The Artist Team grants to the City a fUlly-paid-up irrevocable license to make reproductions of the Project for noncommercial purposes, including but not limited to, reproductions used in city business, advertising, brochures, posters, media publicity, catalogs, souvenirs, photographs, drawings, or publications of the city, providing however, the City may not make a full scale exact duplicate of the Project. The city shall include the Artist's copyright notice on any reproductions. Title to the completed ~ -.. g. h. ~ Exhibit A to Standard Form Agreement Page 6 ?/lc2 . Project immediately vests in the city upon completion, along with all rights of ownership, possession and control. Prior to completion of the Project, the city has the right, at its option, to claim ownership, possession and control of the uncompleted portions of the Project which are on site. i. Upon final payment to the Artist Team, all right, title and interest to the Project shall become vested in the City of Chula vista. j. The Artist Team reserves all copyrights in the Project, the preliminary design, and any incidental works made in the creation of the work. The responsibility for registration of the copyright shall be the responsibility of the copyright holder under this agreement. 15. Documentation Phase a. The Artist Team shall provide information on the Project as requested by the city before the Documentation Phase is approved by the city. b. At no additional cost to the City, the Artist Team shall provide the City with two sets of 35mm color slides of the Project within thirty working days after-the project has been installed. c. At no additional cost to the city, the Artist Team shall provide the City with two videotapes (1/2" VHS) documenting the complete process of creating and installing Project, within thirty days after the Project has been installed. d. At no additional cost to the city, the Artist Team shall construct and install a plaque or similar means of identification, identifying the Artist Team, the title of the Project, the year it was completed, and a credit reading as follows: "commissioned for the community of Chula vista under the leadership of the Chula vista City Council and funded jointly by California Library Construction Renovation Bond Act Grant from the California state Library and the City of Chula vista. The plaque shall be constructed and installed before the documentation phase may be approved. The plaque shall be publicly displayed in the vicinity of the Project. The city agrees that unless the Artist Team requests to the contrary in writing, all . . 2PTY9-A.wp November 2, 1993 Exhibit A to Standard Form Agreement Page 7 ?{'Y;;/i-1f f. g. e. references to the Project and all reproductions of the Project shall credit the Project to the Artist Team and the City. The Artist Team agrees that all formal references to the Project shall include the following credit line: "An original work commissioned by the City Council of Chula Vista, California." within fourteen (14) working days of the receipt of the documentation materials submitted by the Artist Team, the City shall submit written approval or denial of the Documentation Phase. The City's acceptance of the Documentation Phase shall constitute completion of the project. The Artist Team shall cooperate with the City (at the city's option) in a community dedication after written approval of the completion of the Project. The Artist Team may be required to discuss the Project with the general public or media in special meetings scheduled for this purpose but they shall not make any public information release in connection with services performed under this Agreement without prior notification to the City (Public Information Coordinator). --- --- B. Date for Commencement of Consultant Services: (X ) Same as Effective Date of Agreement ( ) O.ther: C. Dates or Time Limits for Delivery of Deliverables: Deliverable No.1: August 31, 1995 - Off-site completion of mural by Artist Team and delivery to site; on-site installation and colorization of mural panels. (Completion of Final On-Site Fabrication Phase) Deliverable No.2: September 3D, 1995 - Completion of final documentation phase (slides, video and plaque) D. Date for completion of all Consultant services: September 3D, 1995 9. Insurance Requirements: 2PTY9-A.wp November 2, 1993 Exhibit A to Standard Form Agreement Page 8 --- ~- <1:1 -~ - -._ _____v_n. -....-.. statutory Worker's Compensation Insurance Employer's Liability Insurance coverage: $1,000,000.* Commercial General Liability Insurance: $1,000,000. Errors and Omissions insurance: None Required (included in Commercial General Liability coverage). Errors and Omissions Insurance: $250,000 (not included in Commercial General Liability coverage). * Insurance shall date-from the first day of construction until one year after acceptance by the City Council. . ( ) (x) ( ) ( ) ( ) 10. Materials Required to be Supplied by City to Consultant: Office/storage space for 2-3 weeks at beginning of project and 3-4 weeks at the end of project. Hydraulic lift 11. Compensation: A. (x) Single Fixed Fee Arrangement. For satisfactory performance, as determined by the city, of all of the Defined Services by Consultant as herein required, City shall pay a single fixed fee in the amounts and at the times or Milestones or for the Deliverables set forth below: single Fixed Fee Amount: $46.821 payable as follows: . Milestone or Event or Deliverable Amount or Percent of Fixed Fee Initial payment upon execution of contract (for Initial On-Site Fabrication Phase including: rental of warehouse, purchase of materials, partial hiring of staff, rental of equipment, preliminary mural design and layout, etc.) Completion of Initial On-Site Fabrication Phase and initial Off-site Fabrication Phase including completion of off-site construction of panels and framework and preliminary design layout. Anticipated completion date June 30, 1995. Completion of Final Off-site Fabrication Phase including completion of puzzle pieces by students and artists and delivery to installation site. Anticipated completion date July 31, 1995. completion of Final On-Site Fabrication Phase including completion of off-site mural by Artist Team; on-site installation and colorization of mural panels. Anticipated completion date $12,600 $9,000 $12,600 $3,257 . 2PTY9-A.wp November 2, 1993 Exhibit A to Standard Form Agreement Page 9 ~~Jj// g-L/{jJ mural panels. Anticipated completion date August 31, 1995. -. Completion of documentation phase. Anticipated completion date September 30, 1995. B. ( ) Phased Fixed Fee Arrangement. For the performance of each phase or portion of the Defined Services by Consultant as are separately identified below, City shall pay the fixed fee associated with each phase of Services, in the amounts and at the times or milestones or Deliverables set forth . Consultant shall not commence Services under any Phase, and shall not be entitled to the compensation for a Phase, unless city shall have issued a notice to proceed to Consultant as to said Phase. $9,364 Phase Fee for Said Phase C. ( ) Hourly Rate Arrangement For performance of the Defined Services by Consultant as herein required, City shall pay Consultant for the productive hours of time spent by Consultant in the performance of said Services, at the rates or amounts set forth in the Rate Schedule hereinbelow according to the following terms and conditions: (1) () Not-to-Exceed Limitation on Time and Materials Arrangement - Notwithstanding the expenditure by Consultant of time and materials in excess of said Maximum Compensation amount, Consultant agrees that Consultant will perform all of the Defined Services herein required of Consultant for $ including all Materials, and other "reimbursables" ("Maximum Compensation") . (2) ( ) Limitation without Further Authorization on Time and Materials Arrangement At such time as Consultant shall have incurred time and materials equal to ("Authorization Limit"), Consultant shall not be entitled to any additional compensation without further authorization issued in writing and approved by the city. Nothing herein shall preclude Consultant from providing additional Services at Consultant's own cost and expense. 2PTY9-A.wp November 2, 1993 Exhibit A to Standard Form Agreement Page 10 -. 8"~ 'I ~ . . . Rate Schedule category of Employee of Consultant Hourly Rate Name ( ) Hourly rates may increase by 6% for services rendered after [month], 19 , if delay in providing services is caused by city. 12. Materials Reimbursement Arrangement For the cost of out of pocket expenses incurred by Consultant in the performance of services herein required, City shall pay Consultant at the rates or amounts set forth below: (x) None, the compensation includes all costs. Cost or Rate ( ) Reports, not to exceed $ ( ) Copie.s, not to exceed $ : ( ) Travel, not to exceed $ ( ) Printing, not to exceed $ ( ) Postage, not to exceed $ : ( ) Delivery, not to exceed $ ( ) Long Distance Telephone Charges, not to exceed $ ( ) Other Actual Identifiable Direct Costs: , not to exceed $ . . , not to exceed $ : 2PTY9-A.wp November 2, 1993 Exhibit A to Standard Form Agreement Page 11 g---'1? I g- 4% 13. Contract Administrators: .-. city: Chula vista Public Library/Nora McMartin and Deborah Barrow Consultant: Victor Orozco Ochoa and John Neal Hill 14. Liquidated Damages Rate: ( ) $ per day. ( ) Other: 15. statement of Economic Interests, Consultant Reporting Categories, per Conflict of Interest Code: ( x) Not Applicable. Not an FPPC Filer. ( ) FPPC Filer ( ) Category No.1. Investments and sources of income. ( ) Category No.2. Interests in real property. ) Category No. property and regulatory, department. ( Category No.4. Investments in business entities ftnd sources of income which engage in land development, construction or the acquisition or sale of real property. ( 3. Investments, interest in real sources of income-subject to the permit or licensing authority of the - ( ) Category No.5. Investments in business entities and sources of income of the type which, within the past two years, have contracted with the City of Chula Vista (Redevelopment Agency) to provide services, supplies, materials, machinery or equipment. ( ) Category No.6. Investments in business entities and sources of income of the type which, within the past two years, have contracted with the designated employee's department to provide services, supplies, materials, machinery or equipment. ( ) Category No.7. Business positions. ........ 2PTY9-A.wp November 2, 1993 S--J/r Exhibit A to Standard Form Agreement Page 12 . . . ( ) List "Consultant Associates" interests in real property within 2 radial miles of Project Property, if any: 16. ( ) Consultant is Real Estate Broker and/or Salesman 17. Permitted Subconsultants: 18. Bill Processing: A. Consultant's Billing to be submitted for the following period of time: (x ) Monthly ( ) Quarterly ( ) other: B. Billing: Day of the Period for submission of ~onsultant's (x ) First of the Month ( ) 15th Day of each Month ( ) End of the Month ( ) Other: C. City's Account Number: 605-6050-5298 LB125 19. Security for Performance ( ) Performance Bond, $ ( ) Letter of Credit, $ ( ) Other Security: Type: Amount: $ (x ) Retention. If this space is checked, then notwithstanding other provisions to the contrary requiring the payment of compensation to the Consultant sooner, the City shall be entitled to retain, at their option, either the following "Retention Percentage" or "Retention Amount" until the city determines that the Retention Release Event, listed below, has occurred: ( X) Retention Percentage: -lQ% ( ) Retention Amount: $ 2PTY9-A.wp November 2, 1993 Exhibit A to Standard Form Agreement Page 13 <g'/'1r; / g- 6() '" ~ Retention Release Event: (X ) Completion of All Consultant Services ( ) other: ""'I ~ 2PTY9-A.wp November 2, 1993 y.--~o Exhibit A to Standard Form Agreement Page 14 -. ~_.~----~ --.~ ._~- --.-..._- . Attachment F "WAIVER. The artist recognizes that he or she may have certain rights arising from the "California Art Preservation Act" (Civil Code 987 et seq.) or the "Visual Artists' Rights Act of 1990" (17 U.S.C. 101 et seq.). Those Acts require that a waiver of their provisions be expressly made in writing and being fully informed, the artist and his or her agents, heirs, successors and assigns hereby waive any and 'all rights he or she may have under the provisions of the "California Art Preservation Act" (Civil Code 987 et seq.) or the "Visual Artists' Rights Act of 1990 (17 U.S.C. 101 et seq.). The artist, his or her agents, heirs, successors and assigns further agree not to attempt to defeat this waiver by cooperating, encouraging or assisting any organization which seeks to bring an action under these acts." . , . f5~sJ ...t 04127195 10: 31 U519 23' 3'07 lITDB IiII 0011001 MTDB 1- _ rTi'7 r.1~~ r "lJUt, I ,Tr l L I ~ It J~ [ I ,I' L~ 'J ....., '255 Imperial AllGflue. SUlle,OOO San o;ego. CA 92101-;490 :;;19123'-1466 FAX 16,9) 234-3407 April 27, 1995 ADM 121 (PC 100) Mr. David Malcolm Port Commissioner San Diego Unified Port District P.o.~ox~ San Diego, CA 112 Dear II: In .id-1996 MTDB will open its north LRT extension to Old Town. Then, by the end of 1997 we plan to extend the line through Mission Vall~ to the San Diego Jack Murphy StadiUD. With this expanded transit service, and the new Coaster express rail coming in to the Old Town Transit Center, I see the opportunity for a greatlY improved transit connection to Lindbergh Field. Over the short-term. this connection will have to rely upon buses, but the longer-te~ holds the promise for a possible high quality guideway linkage. . As the Port District advances its strategic planning effort. I hope that you will make sure that the future potential of transit is seriously considered as an integral part of the airport's ground access improvement plan. Please feel free to call .. if you care to discuss this matter further. y, cc: Leon Williams. Chairman 11_.'-: Clty.1 ClIuI. V"'...Cll,.,COtonIdO. CiIy.,ElCojo..Cly..'_......... Cl,oI ~...... Cllyollomon G_. c...._ CIy. CIlyol-" Cl,"SonOllgl>.Cilyol s.m... Countyof SIll~, BwaolCallc:mla N.....pcli..._OOVOI....."tllooRll.CaardlnolOr.'........,- Tr..ohSyslMnoncllO RotU_,.........1ty1or ~P.__atIon SubSidlArV ~atioR5: ~I $en DtegO TransnCoJpolalkJn. !.i) San OIegoTtolay,lno.;and : IJ San 0-.,01 ArIZona Eastern RaiMt Cot'rlpaPlY /;(Cl- - /