HomeMy WebLinkAboutcc min 1986/09/16 MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA
Tuesday, September 16, 1986 Council Chamber
7:00 p.m. Public Services Building
ROLL CALL
MEMBERS PRESENT: Mayor Cox; Councilmembers Malcolm, Moore,
Campbell, McCandliss
MEMBERS ABSENT: None
STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Goss, City Attorney Harron,
PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG, SILENT PRAYER
The Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag was led by Mayor Cox followed
by a moment of silent prayer.
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES - None.
2. SPECIAL ORDERS OF THE DAY
a. OATH OF OFFICE RICHARD BOGET, BOARD OF APPEALS
The Oath of Office was administered by City Clerk Fulasz.
b. PROCLAMATION CELEBRATING SEPTEMBER 20-29 AS "COASTWEEK"
The proclamation was presented to Coastal Commissioner Malcolm.
c. RESOLUTION 12706 HONORING THE CITY OF NATIONAL CITY ON THE
OCCASION OF THEIR 100TH ANNIVERSARY
(Unanimous Consent)
The City of National City will celebrate its 100th Anniversary
on September 17, 1987.
RESOLUTION OFFERED BY MAYOR COX, the reading of the text was
waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously.
3. WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
a. REQUEST TO LEGITIMIZE AN EXISTING 46 SQUARE FOOT WALL SIGN AT
381 "E" STREET - Camera Bug, 381 "E" Street, Chula Vista, CA
92010
MINUTES 2 September 16, 1986
This is an appeal to approve the sign painted on the west wall
of the Camera Bug store at 381 E Street. Staff advises the
additional sign placed on this building is illegal without a
variance; therefore, on August 13, 1986, a public hearing
before the Planning Commission was held to consider a variance
request and was denied.
City Manager Goss recommended the applicant be advised to
reapply for a variance if he wishes to pursue this application
through the City Council; that all fees be waived in light of
the staff work already completed on the application; and that
the City Council consider an amendment to the Municipal Code
which would permit them to waive appeal periods when in their
judgement, circumstances so justify.
Mayor Cox stated the applicant notified staff he would be
unable to attend this evening's meeting and he still wished to
address Council on this item.
MSUC (Cox/McCandliss) continue this item to October 7, 1986.
b. PROTESTING THE AMENDMENT OF SECTION 10.52.090 OF THE CHULA
VISTA MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO PARKING OF HEAVY DUTY
VEHICLES IN RESIDENTIAL DISTRICTS - Frances & James Boyle, 612
Myra Avenue, Chula Vista, CA 92010
Mr. James G. Boyle, 612 Myra Avenue, Chula Vista, discussed
the following pertaining to the proposed Municipal Code
amendment: the occasional curbside parking of RVs for 72
hours does not constitute a safety hazard; .access for
vehicular parking in residential areas; if subsection "A"
omits reference to house trailers, trailers, or house cars,
this amendment would be acceptable; suggested this section
remain as is.
City Manager Goss reported since the subject of prohibiting
parking RVs on public streets for less than 72 hours will be
reheard by the Safety Commission, it is recommended .this
letter be referred to that body on October 9, 1986 and the
writer be notified when this ordinance is considered by the
City Council.
MSUC (Cox/McCandliss) refer to the Safety Commission and have it
come back when the RV item comes back to the City Council.
c. PETITION URGING DISAPPROVAL OF INSTALLATION OF FENCING NORTH
OF THE LA BONITA CONDOMINIUMS - Residents, La Bonita
Condominiums, 4201 Bonita Road, Bonita, CA 92002
This is a letter from the condominium owners at the complex
for which Mr. Muff is the manager concerning his efforts, on
their behalf, to place a fence between the condominiums and
the golf course.
MINUTES - 3 - September 16, 1986
The City Manager recommended this letter be acknowledged and
referred to the Parks & Recreation Department and American
Golf.
Dorothy Hauptman, 4201 Bonita Road, Chula Vista, clarified Mr.
Muff is president of the homeowner's association and not the
manager of this complex; residents were uninformed of Mr.
Muf~'s actions regarding this issue; referred to petition
signed by over 350 residents which addresses correcting
problem of stray golf balls; suggested second tee be returned
to its original position.
I4S Malcolm/Cox) for staff recommendation.
Director Of Parks & Recreation Mollinedo remarked American
Golf recommends moving up the tee 40 yards closer to the hole
and screening will be installed for the protection of joggers
and horseback riders along the tee area.
Mayor Cox suggested Mrs. Hauptman be notified when this item
comes back for final approval by the City Council.
The motion to refer this letter to Parks & Recreation and American
Golf passed unanimously.
d. RESIGNATION FROM THE BOARD OF ETHICS Kathleen M. McNamara,
1580-82 Mendocino Drive, Chula Vista 92011
In light of Ms. McNamara's letter, City Manager Goss
recommended this resignation be accepted with regret and a
letter of appreciation be sent.
MSUC (Malcolm/McCandliss) accept staff recommendation.
e. CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY
This $50,000 claim is as a result of a pedestrian accident at
the intersection of Naples and Broadway which occurred on
April 19, 1986.
MSUC (Malcolm/McCandliss) reject the claim.
f. SUGGESTIONS TO IMPROVE THE QUALITY OF TENNIS COURTS Charles
A. Matthews, 175 Halsey Street, Chula Vista 92010
This item pertains to the lack of well-maintained and lighted
tennis courts in Chula Vista.
The City Manager recommended this letter be referred to the
Parks & Recreation Commission and to the 1986-87 CIP process.
MS (McCandliss/Malcolm) for staff recommendation.
MINUTES - 4 September 16, 1986
Councilman Moore requested that included in the motion should
be to direct staff to contact high school and college
districts to provide lighting at their tennis courts.
Charles Matthews, 175 Halsey Street, Chula Vista, referred to
his letter dated September 8, 1986, noting these areas have
been in decline since the lights were turned off as a result
of Proposition 13; in 1971, 22 lighted courts were available
to a population of 70,000; the City now has a population of
approximately 120,000 but only eight lighted courts exist;
suggested Council talk to tennis pros at Southwestern College;
existing courts should be upgraded and more facilities
provided in the City.
The motion to refer this letter to staff and contact the school
districts passed unanimously.
g. REQUEST FOR OBTAINING A 19-ACRE PARCEL ADJACENT TO THE COLLEGE
AND FOR A JOINT DEVELOPMENT OF A YOUTH SOCCER FIELD - Joseph
M. Conte, Superintendent/President, Southwestern College, 900
Otay Lakes Road, Chula Vista 92010
This request to obtain ownership of the area which has been
part of Southwestern College, was initially planned as a
botanical garden. In addition to reacquiring this land, the
College also expressed interest in possibly providing land for
a minimum of five years at the northwest corner of Otay Lakes
Road and East "H" Street for use by youth soccer.
Since there are several considerations regarding this
proposal, it ~as recommended this be referred to staff for
study and report.
Councilman Malcolm expressed concern that the request for the
City to give up 19 acres for only a five-year lease of another
parcel was not equitable.
MSUC (Malcolm/Cox) refer to staff.
h. LETTERS OPPOSING CLOSING OF CHULA VISTA BOYS CLUB The Nuno
Family 588-1/2 McIntosh; Dora Liera, 576 McIntosh; Maryann
Crabtree, 616 Oaklawn Ave., #4, Chula Vista 92010
These letters reflected opposition to closure of the Boys Club
located at Fifth Avenue and "I" Street.
City Manager Goss recommended the letters be received and
acknowledged.
MINUTES - 5 - September 16, 1986
The following individuals spoke in opposition to closing the
Boys Club facility: Howard Stewart, 696 Ash Avenue, Chula
Vista; Regina Siso, 662 Beech Avenue; Judy Walsh-jackson, 50
Monte Vista, #48. Their concerns included: elementary
schools are within "biking" distance of the club; drug
rehabilitation counseling (AIRS) provided here; youngsters
need something to keep them off the streets.
Council discussion followed regarding timeframe for closure of
the facility; community is getting the wrong impression
regarding closing club; closure contingent on closing deal for
shopping center expansion; affordability of more than one
center; main concern is transportation to new facility if it
is moved.
MS (Moore/Cox) direct staff to pursue a program Of potential free
ridership for any youth 16 years or younger to any Boys/Girls Club
complex.
Bill Tipan expressed concern with the 90-day notice to the
club to vacate the premises; current membership is over 1,000;
suggested City try to relocate club in the same area as it
currently exists; requested Boys/Girls clubs be combined.
The motion to pursue free ridership program passed unanimously.
MSUC (McCandliss/Cox) receive and acknowledge letters (and include
status report to be provided to interested people).
i. REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF BUSINESS LICENSE FEES Cliff Ridehour,
ACSW, Program Coordinator, Mental Health Systems, Inc., 265
"E" Street, Ste. B, Chula Vista 92010
Mr. Ridenour, on behalf of Kinesis South, requested these fees
be waived due to the non-profit tax-exempt status of his
organization.
It was recommended this letter be referred to staff to reply,
in writing, outlining Council policy on waiving business
license fees for non-profit organizations.
MSUC (McCandliss/Campbell) waive the fees subject to staff
conditions.
j. REQUEST FOR SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION REGARDING IMMUNITY FROM
LIABILITY EXPOSURE FOR CITIES, PARKS, SCHOOLS, AND
RECREATIONAL FACILITIES George Scott, Mayor Pro Tem, City of
Avalon, Santa Catalina Island, P.O. Box 707, Avalon, CA 90704
The proposed legislation could prevent cities from closing
local parks and locking recreational facility doors.
~IINUTES - 6 - September 16, 1986
MSUC (McCandliss/Malcolm) refer to the Legislative Committee for
review and recommendation.
k. REQUEST THAT VEGAS CARDROOM PERMIT NOT BE RENEWED - Sidney
Rosenbloom, Vice President, Director of Operations, C&R
Clothiers, Inc., P. O. Box 672A, Culver City, CA 90232
Sidney Rosenbloom's request to deny this permit was on the
basis the operation is not conducive to serving the general
public.
City Manager Goss stated a report will be provided to Council
on October 21 regarding cardroom operations.
MSUC (Cox/Moore) continue this item to October 21.
1. REQUEST FOR SUPPORT OF SPECIAL TAX FOR REGIONAL JUSTICE
FACILITY - George F. Bailey, Supervisor, Second District, 101
West Broadway, Suite 1680, San Diego 92101
Supervisor Bailey requested Council support Proposition "A"
which includes a five-year sunset clause and requires revenue
be used only for acquisition and construction of jail
facilities.
City Manager Goss recommended this request be received and
considered.
Councilman Malcolm expressed concern that the City has
supported other such requests from the County but to date they
have not kept their promise to allocate funds to Chula Vista.
MSUC (Cox/Campbell) support Proposition "A."
m. REQUEST FOR FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE FOR A HOMELESS VETERANS
ASSISTANCE CENTER - Robert Van Keuren, President, Vietnam
Veterans of San Diego, 757 llth Avenue, San Diego 92101
The City Manager recommended this request for funds be
referred to the City's 1986-87 Block Grant Program.
MSUC (Malcolm/Moore) for staff recommendation.
CONSENT CALENDAR (4 -25)
Items 8, 12, 15, 18, 20, 21, and 24 were pulled.
Mayor Cox noted items 10, 13, 21 and 23 required a 4/5the vote.
MSUC (Malcolm/Campbell) to approve the Consent Calendar.
(Councilmembers McCandliss and Campbell opposed item 25.)
MINUTES - 7 - September 16, 1986
4. RESOLUTION 12707 APPROVING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AND THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
RELATING TO THE DESIGNATION OF CHULA VISTA
HARBOR AS THE SOUTHERN HOME PORT OF THE
TALL SHIP CALIFORNIAN AND AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT (Deputy
City Manager)
The City's agreement with the Nautical Heritage Society to
designate Chula Vista Harbor as the Southern Home Port of the Tall
Ship Californian requires that the City make a 925,000 per year
grant to the ship's organization. The County of San Diego
allocated 99,000 in their Community Enhancement Fund to go toward
this 925,000 grant.
The recommendation was that the Council adopt the resolution
authorizing the Mayor to sign the agreement securing the 99,000
from the County.
5. RESOLUTION 12708 REVISING SALARY BANDS FOR EXECUTIVE
MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL IN THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA FOR FISCAL YEAR 1986-87 (City
Manager)
This resolution provides for adjusting the salary bands for
executive managers.
6. RESOLUTION 12708 ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION PLAN FOR MIDDLE
MANAGEMENT EMPLOYEES FOR FISCAL YEAR
1986-87(City Manager)
This resolution provides for the establishment of a compensation
plan for middle managers for FY 1986-87.
The total additional cost for this compensation is approximately
9227,225.
7. RESOLUTION 12710 ESTABLISHING EXECUTIVE AND MI.DDLE
MANAGEMENT FRINGE BENEFITS FOR FISCAL YEAR
1986-87 AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION 8107
(City Manager)
Resolution #8107, adopted 4/6/76, designated the Middle Management
Group. Rather than amend this resolution each time a position is
added or deleted from this group, it is recommended this
resolution be rescinded inasmuch as the compensation and fringe
benefit resolutions contain a current listing of middle managers.
In addition, a revised benefit package for these two groups for FY
1986-87 was proposed.
Mayor Cox noted the list of floating holidays does not include
Thanksgiving Day and asked that it be revised accordingly.
MINUTES 8 September 16, 1986
8. RESOLUTION ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION AND FRINGE
BENEFIT PLAN FOR UNREPRESENTED/
UNCLASSIFIED EMPLOYEES FOR FISCAL YEAR
1986-87 (City Manager)
Pulled from Consent Calendar.
9. RESOLUTION 12711 APPROVING WAGES FOR UNCLASSIFIED HOURLY
EMPLOYEES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1986-87 (City
Manager)
Hourly employees receive no benefits; however, the wages paid to
these individuals are adjusted annually in keeping with
adjustments awarded to other City employees. This maintains the
integral alignment of the salary plan, as well as keeping the
hourly employee Wages at a level competitive with other agencies.
It was recommended these employees be granted a 5% salary increase
retroactive to July 4, 1986.
10. RESOLUTION 12712 AMENDING 1986-87 BUDGET AND PROVIDING FOR
THE APPROPRIATION OF FUNDS FOR SALARY AND
FRINGE BENEFIT INCREASES FOR FY 1986-87
(Assistant City Manager)
At the time the 1986-87 budget was adopted, negotiations with the
various bargaining units had not been completed. Therefore, the
budget needs to be amended to provide funds for salary and fringe
benefit increases for FY 1986-87.
The following amounts are to be appropriated to Non-Departmental
Account 100-0730-5101 from the funds shown:
Parking Meter Fund ~ 6,040
Transit Fund 12,160
Central Garage Fund 27,640
Unappropriated General Fund Reserve 1,693,960
11. RESOLUTION 12713 ACCEPTING TEN DRAINAGE EASEMENTS FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION OF THE TELEGRAPH CANYON CREEK
FLOOD CONTROL CHANNEL AND AUTHORIZING THE
MAYOR TO EXECUTE DEDICATION AGREEMENTS ON
BEHALF OF THE CITY (Director of Public
Works/City Engineer)
On January 21, 1986, Council by Resolution No. 12342 accepted 16
of the 39 easements required for the construction of the Telegraph
Canyon Creek Flood Control Channel. At that time, the Corps Of
Engineers was planning to begin construction of the project in
June 1986. Per their schedule, the City had to obtain and certify
the right-of-way by May 1986. On March 4, 1986, Council
authorized the City Attorney to commence proceedings to acquire
the easements not yet obtained (Resolution No. 12398).
MINUTES - 9 - September 16, 1986
Subsequent to Council's action, negotiations with the property
owners continued to obtain as many easements as possible to avoid
eminent domain proceedings. Nineteen easements were obtained and
staff is now working with the Corps of Engineers on the
realignment of the channel west of Broadway which may negate the
need for 9 of the easements which have been negotiated.
12. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING WORK FOR CLOSED CIRCUIT
TELEVISION INSPECTION OF DESIGNATED SEWER
MAINS, PHASE II IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
(Director of Public Works/City Engineer)
Pulled from Consent Calendar.
13. RESOLUTION 12714 APPROVING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
CHULA VISTA AND THE COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO
AUTHORIZING THE TRANSFER OF ROAD FUNDS
EQUIVALENT TO MONTGOMERY AREA SB 300 FUNDS
AND APPROPRIATING THE FUNDS THEREOF AND
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO EXECUTE SAID
AGREEMENT (Director of Public Works/City
Engineer)
In 1985, the State Legislature added Sections 2126 and 2127 to the
Streets and Highways Code (SB 300) and appropriated ~215,000,000
from the State General Fund to counties and cities for street and
highway maintenance and/or reconstruction. 9125,000,000 was
appropriated for FY 85-86 and 990,000,000 for FY 86-87 with 55
percent going to the cities and 45 percent to the counties.
The City has received its share of the SB 300 appropriations for
FY 85-86 (9623,098) and has negotiated an agreement with the
County of San Diego for the transfer of the SB 300 appropriation
the County received attributable to the Montgomery Area. Per this
agreement, the City will receive 912,681.58 in Road Funds which
represent one-half of the funds the County received attributable
to the Montgomery Area since the annexation became effective at
the midpoint of FY 1985-86.
14. RESOLUTION 12715 DECLARING THE CITY'S INTENTION TO
ESTABLISH A REIMBURSEMENT DISTRICT AT THE.
SOUTHWEST CORNER OF BONITA ROAD/"E" STREET
INTERSECTION AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK
TO GIVE NOTICE THAT A HEARING WILL BE HELD
ON THIS MATTER ON OCTOBER 7, 1986
(Director of Public Works/City Engineer)
MINUTES - 10 - September 16, 1986
On February 4, 1986, Council, by Resolution No. 12355, awarded a
contract to Select Electric, Inc. for the construction of street
improvements on Bonita Road and "E" Street. Because of Safety and
Engineering requirements, the project improved the frontage along
a vacant parcel of land west of Bonita Road and south of "E"
Street. Funds for this project were approved in the FY 1984-85
Capital Improvement Program budget with the condition that the
cost for the vacant land improvements be recovered by the City
through a reimbursement district when the land is subdivided
and/or developed.
Chapter 15.50 of the City Code contains a procedure for the
establishment of reimbursement districts which assure that a
benefited property owner reimburses another party for the excess
costs it incurs when providing public improvements benefiting
property other than its own or in excess of its obligation.
It was recommended Council adopt the Resolution and set a public
hearing on Tuesday, October 7, 1986, at 7 p.m. to consider the
formation of a reimbursement district at the southwest corner of
Bonita Road/"E" Street intersection.
15. RESOLUTION ACCEPTING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS, EUCALYPTUS
RIDGE SUBDIVISION (birector of Public
Works/City Engineer)
Pulled from Consent Calendar.
16. RESOLUTION 12716 ACCEPTING GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM BONITA
LONG CANYON PARTNERSHIP FOR STREET TREE
PURPOSES WITHIN PARCEL MAP 86-11, BONITA
LONG CANYON 2, RELIGIOUS INSTITUTION SITE
(Director Of Public Works/City Engineer)
On March 25, 1986, the Engineering and Planning Departments
conditionally approved Tentative Parcel Map 86-11, which involves
the creation of one new lot from 'the unsubdivided portion of
Bonita-Long Canyon.
One of the conditions placed upon Tentative Parcel Map 86-11
required the owner (Bonita Long Canyon Partnership) to grant a
5.5-foot strip of land along Otay Lakes Road to the City for
street tree purposes.
17. RESOLUTION 12717 AUTHORIZING THE EMERGENCY REPLACEMENT OF A
VEHICLE (Director of Public Works/City
Engineer)
At its meeting of February 5, 1985, the City Council approved the
estaDlishment of an Equipment Replacement Fund as well as policies
and procedures for the operation of that fund. These policies and
procedures specify that an Emergency Replacement Account shall be
MINUTES 11 - September 16, 1986
established within the Fund. This account was to be utilized for
replacement of vehicles after the start of the fiscal year not
specifically budgeted. Such requests would only be considered if
special factors necessitate the prompt and timely replacement of
the vehicle, rather than waiting until the next fiscal year, such
as damage beyond economic repair.
Sufficient funds are available within the Emergency Replacement
Account of the Emergency Replacement Fund (705-7050-5564).
The recommendation is that the City Council approve the resolution
authorizing the emergency replacement of a vehicle assigned to the
Building and Housing Department.
18. REPORT CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED REVISION OF
SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA BOUNDARIES FOR THE
RANCHO DEL REY AREA OF THE EL RANCHO DEL
REY SPECIFIC PLAN MCMILLIN DEVELOPMENT
COMPANY (Director of Planning)
RESOLUTION REVISED SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA BOUNDARIES
FOR RANCHO DEL REY
Pulled from Consent Calendar.
19. RESOLUTION 12718 APPROVING THE 1985-86 GRANTEE PERFORMANCE
REPORT AND AUTHORIZING ITS SUBMITTAL TO
THE U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING & URBAN
DEVELOPMENT (Community Development
Director)
The City annually submits a Grantee Performance Report (GPR) to
the U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development (HUD). The GPR
reports the amount of Community Development Block Grant (CDBG)
funds spent and the progress of CDBG-funded projects as of the end
of the 1985-86 fiscal year (~1.13 million). The 1985-86 GPR has
been drafted and advertised for review by the public. NO public
comments have been received regarding the GPR or the City CDBG
program.
20. RESOLUTION APPROVING MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR
THE PRESERVATION OF SWEETWATER MARSH AMONG
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, AND THE BAYFRONT CONSERVANCY
TRUST (TO be continued 9/18/86)(Community
Development Director)
Pulled from Consent Calendar.
MINUTES - 12 - September 16, 1986
21. RESOLUTION APPROPRIATING ~28,600 FOR ADDITIONAL
SECURITY AT PARK PLAZA AT THE VILLAGE, THE
ADJACENT PARKING STRUCTURE AND PUBLIC
PARKING LOTS DOWNTOWN (Community
Development Director)
Pulled from Consent Calendar.
22. RESOLUTION 12719 APPROPRIATING $10,000 FROM THE
UNAPPROPRIATED BALANCE OF THE GENERAL FUND
AS A LOAN TO THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY TOWN
CENTRE II PROJECT (Director of Finance)
On September 4, 1986, the Redevelopment Agency approved a loan
from the City's General Fund in the amount of ~10,000. This loan
to the Town Centre II project is to pay for legal services of
McDonough, Holland and Allen. It is expected that Homart
Corporation, the developer of the Town Centre II project, will
reimburse the Agency for the legal services and the Agency will
repay the loan from the General Fund.
23. RESOLUTION 12720 AUTHORIZING THE DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL
SERVICES OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA TO
PURCHASE 10 POLICE SEDAN VEHICLES
(Director of Finance)
Council Resolution No. 12703 authorized expenditures for
additional staff and equipment for the Police Department. Ten
sedans were approved for purchase and the City is able to obtain
the vehicles through the State via a cooperative' purchasing
agreement as authorized by Council Resolution No. 6132. Funds are
provided for in Account No. 100-1040-5565.
24. RESOLUTION APPROVING VARIANCE GRANTED BY THE BOARD OF
APPEALS & ADVISORS REGARDING SWIMMING POOL
FENCE AT 4080 BERMUDA DUNES PLACE (Acting
Director Of Building & Housing)
Pulled from Consent Calendar.
25. ORDINANCE 2166 AMENDING THE EASTLAKE I PLANNED COMMUNITY
DISTRICT REGULATIONS ADOPTED BY THE CITY
PURSUANT TO ORDINANCE NO. 2103 - SECOND
READING AND ADOPTION (Continued from
9/10/86)(Director of Planning)
This ordinance was placed on first reading on August 2, 1986.
(Councilmembers McCandliss and Campbell opposed.)
END OF CONSENT CALENDAR
}IINUTES - 13 September 16, 1986
PUBLIC HEARINGS AND RELATED RESOLUTIONS & ORDINANCES
26. PUBLIC HEARING PCM-86-11; AMENDMENT TO OUT-PARCEL #4,
LOCATED WITHIN EL RANCHO DEL REY SPECIFIC
PLAN--CITY COUNCIL-INITIATED (Continued
from 5/13/86)(Director of Planning)
This being the time and place as advertised, Mayor Cox declared
the public hearing open.
Earlier this year, the City Council held hearings and resolved the
status of eight of the nine E1 Rancho del Rey out-parcels. The
remaining parcel, out-parcel #4, was scheduled to be considered on
January 14, 1986, and again on May 13, 1986, at the request of the
property owner.
Since May 1986, the property has been sold. The new owner has
indicated he intends to develop in accordance with the 2-4 du/ac
density on the adopted E1 Rancho Del Rey Specific Plan.
There being no public testimony either for or against, the public
hearing was closed.
MSUC (Cox/Campbell) withdraw PCM-86-11.
27. PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER A POLICY FOR THE SALE OF OPEN
SPACE PROPERTY AND BOUNDARY ADJUSTMENTS TO
OPEN SPACE DISTRICT #3, RANCHO ROBINHOOD
SUBDIVISION; DISTRICT #4, BONITA RIDGE
ESTATES; AND DISTRICT #8, BONITA ROBINHOOD
(Continued from 9/2/86)(Director Of Parks
& Recreation)
RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE OPEN SPACE LAND SALE POLICY,
INITIATING THE PROCESS TO RELEASE THE
CITY'S INTEREST IN OPEN SPACE PROPERTIES,
AND ESTABLISHING THE PROCEDURES REQUIRED
TO RETAIN A LAND APPRAISER
This being the time and place as advertised, Mayor Cox declared
the public hearing open.
At a public hearing on August 5, 1986, to consider the sale of
open space property, Council referred the item to the Parks and
Recreation Department to address additional concerns.
The recommendation was that Council adopt the Open Space Land Sale
Policy; initiate the process to release the City's interest in
open space properties fitting the criteria listed in the Open
Space Land Sale Policy Statement; direct staff to return to
Council with a resolution and report to include the following:
MINgTES - 14 September 16, 1986
Relinquishment of the City's interest for a price to be
determined by an appraiser, at fair market price
The property owner shall have proper legal descriptions
prepared to submit to the City for approval.
Director of Parks & Recreation Mollinedo discussed Council's
previous concerns about reversionary interests in certain
properties, noting the developer of Open Space District #3 is
interested in quit claiming his property.
In response to Councilman Campbell's question, City Attorney
Harron stated if the City wishes fee title to property, this must
be requested at the time dedication is granted.
Councilwoman McCandliss suggested the title as well as the purpose
of this policy be reworded.
The following individuals opposed the sale of open space: C. M.
Couch, 906 Buckaroo Lane, Bonita 92002; Jan Perdue, 902 Buckaroo
Lane; David Smith, 334 Camino Elevado; W. N. Rodman, 305 Bronco
Place; James Johnson, Bonita Ridge Estates.
Their comments included: this policy is a "white washing" for the
benefit of perspective buyers; questioned reverter; sale of open
space will set a bad precedent; two-tiered set of values will be
set for those lots if sale is approved; grading deviation will
result in decrease in property value; serious inequity would
develop; minority opposed to sale of property would suffer; open
space should remain as that was the original intent; questioned
survey performed by Taylors (referred to below); request to
purchase 5,000 sq. ft. of open space on Ponderosa has now been
submitted; open space was entrusted to the City to maintain;
questioned legality of selling open space; if policy is adopted,
limit on square footage purchases should be set.
Stephen and Brenda Taylor, 315 Surrey Drive, Bonita 92002,
requested Council support the sale of open space for the following
reasons: petition containing positive responses (concerning sale)
from 111 out of 125 homes, representing 80% of homeowners; staff
was informed their report dated 8/5/86 was incorrect regarding.
amount of property requested to be purchased, however, present
report does not reflect correction; questioned who would receive
interest on sale of this property; previous request to purchase
open space did not receive as much scrutiny as their request;
cited transfer of property from Mr. Casey.
There being no further testimony either for or against, the public
hearing was closed.
MINUTES 15 - September 16, 1986
Council discussion ensued regarding purpose of this hearing--not
to consider sale but to establish a policy for sale of open space;
no negative impact on the districts by adopting this policy;
criteria for sale is set in policy; policy acceptable with
modifications (title/purpose, what value set to parcels,
guidelines for appraisals, etc.); policy would impact seven
properties; necessity for an EIR on these parcels; questioned need
for a mail ballot when a petition is less expensive.
In answer to ~4ayor Cox's question, Director of Public Works/City
Engineer Lippitt stated this policy would not impact grading
deviations of future districts.
Councilman Malcolm pointed out the problem is with assurances that
this policy would only affect seven properties, noting the policy
is unacceptable without modifications.
MSUC (Cox/Malcolm) revise Section IIIB of policy as follows: "All
revenue derived from the sale of property under reversionary
interest would accrue to the benefit of the Open Space Maintenance
District."
MSUC (Malcolm/McCandliss) put a review of the policy within 12
months after adoption, if it passes.
MSUC (McCandliss/Cox) make following changes to the policy:
Under "TITLE: 'Grading Deviation Policy'" and;
"STATEMENT OF PURPOSE: 'It is the purpose of this policy to
provide the procedures and criteria to identify and sell City
dedicated and open space properties for the specific purpose
of correcting grading deviations made at the time of
subdivision development.'"
Director of Public Works/City Engineer Lippitt explained minor
grading deviations can be made to 'property between approval of
tentative ;nap and final map.
In answer to Councilman Campbell's question, City Attorney Harron
clarified CEQA guidelines necessitate an EIR which can be
determined at the beginning of such a report. In addition, the
Environmental Review Coordinator estimates costs for such reports
and therefore a deposit is required.
Mayor Cox suggested if property was to be conveyed from the City
to the owner, there should be some covenant that this would not
increase the FAR formula, nor would this property be allowed to
have any type of visible structure upon it.
MINUTES - 16 September 16, 1986
MSUC (Malcolm/Cox) do not allow additional square footage to De
used in calculation of any type of additional property to the
structure (house).
MSUC (Malcolm/Campbell) require applicant to deposit funds for
environmental impact report and appraisal prior to City ordering
an appraisal.
MS (Cox/Campbell) approve mail ballot (indicating majority vote,
50 + 1).
The motion passed by the following vote:
AYES: Cox, Campbell, Moore
NOES: McCandliss, Malcolm
ABSENT: None
MSC (Cox/Campbell) bring back changes at next Tuesday's meeting
(on September 23)(Councilman Malcolm opposed).
28. PUBLIC HEARING SPECIAL ASSESSMENT DISTRICT PURSUANT TO
IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1911 - PHASE XVII CASH
CONTRACT (Director of Public Works/City
Engineer)
RESOLUTION 12721 MAKING FINDINGS AT PUBLIC HEARING PURSUANT
TO CHAPTER 27 OF THE "IMPROVEMENT ACT OF
1911"
Director of Public Works/City Engineer Lippitt reported the City
Council at their meeting of August 5, 1986, adopted a map showing
the nature and location of certain public improvements and showing
proposed boundaries of 1911 Block Act-Phase XVII Cash Contract.
In addition, City Council approved a resolution ordering the
installation of certain improvements within various blocks and
instructing the Superintendent of Streets to give notice and order
the construction of said improvement. A table was provided to
Council identifying the parcels by assessment number which gave a
general description of the improvements to be installed, the
estimated total cost of the improvements, the estimated cost to be
paid for by the property owner, the estimated cost to be paid for
by the City, an indication that the property owner has commenced
work on the public improvements on his own, and identifying those
properties which have protested as of this date the formation of
the assessment district. The City's participation in the cost of
the improvements shall be in accordance with Council Policy No.
505-01.
The City will be awarding a cash contract at a future date for
construction of the required improvements for this Assessment
District. It is estimated the total project cost will be about
$102,400. The City's share is about $12,100.
MINUTES - 17 September 16, 1986
It was recommended Council adopt the resolution and authorize
staff to develop cleanup legislation to SB 2477 (modification to
1911 Block Act restricting cities' ability to construct missing
improvements) with the League of California Cities.
Eugene Otto, 83 Millan Court, Chula Vista, stated he was in favor
of requiring owner install improvements for parcel 2 of 18 located
east of First Avenue on Millan Court; cited problem with debris in
this area; no hardship case exists since property owner is
currently requesting ~42,000 for this property.
There being no further testimony either for or against, the public
hearing was closed.
RESOLUTION OFFERED BY MAYOR COX, the reading of the text was
waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously.
29. PUBLIC HEARING REGARDING AMENDMENTS TO SDG&E FRANCHISE
(City Manager)
RESOLUTION 12722 APPROVING THE MEMORANDUM OF AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA AND SAN
DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY FOR
UNDERGROUND UTILITIES ALLOCATION
ORDINANCE 2167 AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1427 REGARDING THE
SAN DIEGO GAS & ELECTRIC COMPANY FRANCHISE
BY REPEALING SECTION 9(b) AND SUBSTITUTING
OTHER CONSIDERATIONS - FIRST READING
This being the time and place as advertised, Mayor Cox declared
the public hearing open.
City Manager Goss reported that in 1972 the City of Chula Vista
entered into two franchise agreements with SDG&E--one for
distributing electricity and the other for distributing gas;
agreements are for 25 years, with an electric franchise fee of
1.1% of gross annual receipts and the gas franchise fee at 2% of
gross annual receipts; the electric franchise provides for the
undergrounding of utilities; basically, SDG&E proposes to provide
improvements, easements and other considerations worth in the
range of $2.5-~3 million in the immediate future, in exchange for
reducing the amount for undergrounding, which would slow down the
undergrounding program by about two to three years in the
mid-1990's; sale of overhead streetlights to the City will be
beneficial for bayfront development.
There being no puDlic testimony either for or against, the public
hearing was closed.
MINUTES 18 - September 16, 1986
Mayor Cox discussed the public improvements put in at the SDG&E
substation located across the street from Del Rey High School. He
asked if SDG&E could assure the City they would cooperate in
installing missing improvements at their other substations (Allen
School Road; Otay Lakes Road; along SDG&E easement; Fourth Avenue
extension) within the next few years.
In response, Harry Compton, representing SDG&E, stated he has made
a verbal commitment to the Council committee that these
improvements will be worked out as soon as funds are located
solnewhere other than SDG&E'S operating budget.
RESOLUTION OFFERED BY COUNCILMAN MOORE, the reading of the text
was waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously.
UNANIMOUS CONSENT
29a.RESOLUTION 12728 CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF A SPECIAL
MAIL BALLOT ELECTION TO BE HELD ON
TUESDAY, DECEMBER 16, 1986 FOR THE PURPOSE
OF SUBMITTING TO THE QUALIFIED ELECTORS OF
CHULA VISTA, A VOTE ON THE RENT CONTROL
INITIATIVE (City Clerk)
b. RESOLUTION 12729 REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO
PERMIT THE REGISTRAR OF VOTERS TO RENDER
CERTAIN SPECIFIED SERVICES TO THE CITY IN
CONNECTION WITH THE CONDUCT OF A SPECIAL
MAIL BALLOT ELECTION TO BE HELD ON
DECEMBER 16, 1986 IN THE CITY OF CHULA
VISTA
C.RESOLUTION 12730 APPOINTING THE REGISTRAR OF VOTERS DEPUTY
CITY CLERK TO FACILITATE THE EXECUTION OF
DOCUMENTS PERTAINING TO THE SPECIAL MAIL
BALLOT ELECTION TO BE HELD ON DECEMBER 16,
1986
d.RESOLUTION 12731 ORDERING THE CANVASS OF THE SPECIAL MAIL
BALLOT ELECTION TO BE HELD ON DECEMBER 16,
1986 TO BE MADE BY THE CITY CLERK
Mayor Cox discussed the recent controversy surrounding Council's
decision last week not to call a special election pertaining to
the subject rent control initiative even though it qualified;
based on legal opinions, convinced if this issue placed on ballot,
it will have some severe constitutional and legal flaws; City
council has responsibility to guarantee citizens there is some
chance such an issue could be enforceable; considered allowing a
sitting or presiding judge determine constitutionality; City could
have City Attorney seek declaratory relief through the Court if
initiative passes; cost to hold a special election as well as
providing defense in court; seeking declaratory relief would
absolve City from legal expenses.
MINUTES 19 - September 16, 1986
Councilman Campbell remarked the City has a fundamental
responsibility to the electorate and he could not support placing
something on the ballot which has been declared unconstitutional,
invalid and illegal; suggested Council could be considered
"caring" under pressure of a special interest group; Rev. Flaugher
was informed there were other valid ordinances but he chose not to
use them; concerned with use of COLA for social security.
Councilmembers t4alcolm and McCandliss spoke in favor of placing
the initiative on the ballot stating it is up to the courts to
determine its constitutionality; rights of voters should be
protected; do not support rent control but voters should be
allowed to choose.
The following individuals spoke in favor of placing the rent
initiative on the ballot: Pat Kelly, 1425 Second Avenue, Sp. 342,
Chula Vista 92011; Bob Flaugher, 1100 Industrial Blvd., 1-10; Joe
Stern, 6923 Amherst Street, San Diego 92115; Tim Nader, 260
Davidson; Penny Allen, 666 Mariposa Circle, Chula Vista.
Their concerns involved: recent meeting of proponents of this
initiative; signators of the petition had copies of initiative
available for their review; City Council has ten days to either
pass the initiative or call a special election; only asking for
the right to vote; COLA increase was 3% while rents increased
20-30%; if this is not allowed to go on the ballot this year, it
will probably come back next year.
The following individuals opposed the rent control initiative:
Sue Henry, 352 Broadway, Chula Vista; Terry Dowdall, Attorney with
Swanson & Dowdall, 203 NO. Golden Circle Drive, Santa Ana; Adeline
Smith, 725 E. Bradley Avenue, #1, E1 CAjon 92021; Roy Muroaka,
Second Avenue, Chula Vista.
Their comments included: questioned if outside counsel had been
retained by the City; ordinance is unconstitutional due to
violations of due process, confiscatory effects placed on park
owners; limitation of 30% social security index, lack of ability
to consider market factors, expo factor provision; confusing issue
which could reek havoc among park owners, residents, and citizens
on its interpretation; threat of inverse condemnation
(de-control); GSMOL does not support; of 36 mobilehome parks in
Chula Vista, 17 owners live in Chula Vista and 29 reside in the
County; park owner representatives met with Rev. Flaugher for
three months and he chose to break away from negotiations; once
initiative passes, you cannot add to it; concerned that utilities
will remain in the base rent.
MINUTES 20 - September 16, 1986
14ayor Cox asked if the City Council places this issue on the
ballot, would this satisfy the City Attorney if Council took
immediate action to seek declaratory relief through the courts in
order to avoid liability exposure. In response, City Attorney
Harron stated the court has discretion, however, legal fees would
be greatly reduced.
Councilman Moore questioned if the initiative process is
protected, how does the City protect the rights of the other
42,000 voters--how are they advised?
RESOLUTION OFFERED BY COUNCILMAN MALCOLM, the reading of the text
was waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved with the
following two conditions: ask City Attorney to prepare an
impartial analysis and if there are questions regarding
constitutionality, those concerns be included in the impartial
analysis; at the discretion of the City Attorney in the event the
issue is passed by voters of Chula Vista, Council will take action
to seek immediate declaratory relief action so that
constitutionality of the issue can be dealt with at the front end
(Councilman Campbell opposed).
The motion carried with Councilman Campbell voting "no."
The Council recessed at 10:35 p.m. and reconvened at 10:43 p.m.
30. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS - None.
PULLED ITEMS FROM CONSENT CALENDAR
8. RESOLUTION 12723 ESTABLISHING COMPENSATION AND FRINGE
BENEFIT PLAN FOR UNREPRESENTED/
UNCLASSIFIED EMPLOYEES FOR FISCAL YEAR
1986-87 (City Manager)
This resolution establishes the compensation and fringe benefit
plan for unclassified/unrepresented positions for FY 1986-87.
Mayor Cox recommended the compensation for the Secretary to the
Mayor/City Council be 7.5%.
RESOLUTION OFFERED BY MAYOR COX, the reading of the text was
waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously.
12. RESOLUTION 12724 ACCEPTING WORK FOR CLOSED CIRCUIT
TELEVISION INSPECTION OF DESIGNATED SEWER
MAINS, PHASE II IN THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA
(Director of Public Works/City Engineer)
~INUTES - 21 - September 16, 1986
National Plant Services Inc. has completed the cleaning, closed
circuit television inspection of selected sewer mains within the
City and has prepared a report which evaluates the condition of
the sewer mains inspected. This contract, dated April 10, 1986,
was awarded by the City Council on March 25, 1986, by Resolution
12415.
The television inspection showed that in general, four major
problems exist in these sewer mains: (1) broken sections, holes
and broken joints; (2) root intrusions and offset alignment at
various joints; (3) flat or sagging sections in several reaches
and; (4) protruding (tap ins) service lateral connections in many
locations throughout the sewer mains inspected. The cost to
repair the deficiencies was estimated Dy the consultant to be
about $338,600.
FISCAL STATEMENT:
Authorized Expenditures ~34,502.48
Original Contract Amount $33,600.00
Actual Contract Amount' 33,600.00
Balance ~ 902.48
In response to Councilman Moore's question, (Director of Public
Works/City Engineer Lippitt explained staff proposes to review in
detail the inspector's comments and the films and come back in
January to request the ~150,000 in CIP funds for high priority
items.
RESOLUTION OFFERED BY MAYOR COX, the reading of the text was
waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously.
15. RESOLUTION 12725 ACCEPTING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS, EUCALYPTUS
RIDGE SUBDIVISION (Director of Public
Works/City Engineer)
The ADMA Company, Inc. by their letter dated August 27, 1986, is
requesting acceptance of the public improvements for Eucalyptus
Ridge Subdivision. They are also requesting a waiver of the
requirement for posting a 15% surety bond to guarantee the public
improvements for a year after acceptance by the Council. The
improvement agreement was approved by Resolution 11474 dated
November 22, 1983.
Council was recommended to adopt the resolution accepting public
improvements and declare that the intent of the one-year bond for
material and workmanship has been fulfilled due to the time lag
between completion of construction and this acceptance, and that
posting of the bond is not required.
MINUTES 22 - September 16, 1986
Councilwoman McCandliss questioned the timeframe to accept these
improvements. In response, Director Lippitt explained after the
developer is advised of necessary corrections, they must contact
the City upon correction of these deficiencies for final
inspection.
RESOLUTION OFFERED BY COUNCILWOMAN MCCANDLISS, the reading of the
text v~as waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved
unanimously.
18. REPORT CONSIDERATION OF PROPOSED REVISION OF
SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA BOUNDARIES FOR THE
RANCHO DEL REY AREA OF THE EL RANCHO DEL
REY SPECIFIC PLAN - McMILLIN DEVELOPMENT
COMPANY (Director of Planning)
RESOLUTION 12726 REVISED SECTIONAL PLANNING AREA BOUNDARIES
FOR RANCHO DEL REY
On November 5, 1985, the City Council adopted the revised E1
Rancho del Rey Specific Plan. The Specific Plan established
certain criteria for later dividing the 1,582-acre Corcoran Ranch
SPA into planning subareas. On June 3, 1986, the City Council
approved dividing this acreage into four separate SPA's
(collectively called the Rancho del Rey area). McMillin
Development Company is now requesting a revision to those
boundaries to include Rice Canyon (north) in SPA-I rather than
SPA-Ill.
In answer to Council's questions, Planning Director Krempl
explained the only change would be to the canyon area.
RESOLUTION OFFERED BY COUNCILMAN MALCOLM, the reading of the text
~as waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously.
20. RESOLUTION APPROVING MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING FOR
THE PRESERVATION OF SWEETWATER MARSH AMONG
THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, AND THE BAYFRONT CONSERVANCY
TRUST (TO be continued 9/18/86)(Community
Development Director)
The United States Government, state, county, and cities of
National City and Chula Vista are involved in some way or another
with the responsibility for insuring the Sweetwater Marsh is
preserved and enhanced. The subject Memorandum of Understanding
is to be executed by the State of California Department of Fish
and Game, the Bayfront Conservancy Trust (BCT) as well as the City
of Chula Vista. The Trust is designated in the City's Local
Coastal Plan to provide assurances of protection of those portions
of the marsh within the LCP jurisdiction. The City, as sponsor of
the Trust, by this agreement, concurs with the proposal to have
the BCT responsible for the marsh.
MINUTES 23 - September 16, 1986
Mayor Cox remarked the draft presented to the Council should not
be represented as the draft accepted by the Department of Fish
Game. Specifically, the Department of Fish & Game is concerned
with funding for the biologist position by the Bayfront
Conservancy Trust. He suggested a reverter that in the event the
biologist position was no longer funded, the property would revert
to the Fish & Wildlife Service.
[4SUC (Cox/Malcolm) continue this item to Thursday, September 18
following the Redevelopment Agency meeting.
21. RESOLUTION APPROPRIATING ~28,600 FOR ADDITIONAL
SECURITY AT PARK PLAZA AT THE VILLAGE, THE
ADJACENT PARKING STRUCTURE AND PUBLIC
PARKING LOTS DOWNTOWN (Community
Development Director)
On September 4, 1986 the City Council acting as the Redevelopment
Agency directed staff prepare a resolution for the appropriation
of funds to pay for additional security at Park Plaza at the
Village, the adjacent parking structure and other public parking
lots within the downtown area. The resolution provides funding
for Chula Vista Police Reserves and Chula Vista Police Officers to
patrol Park Plaza at the Village and other downtown public parking
lots.
The Town Centre Project Area Committee recommended the use of
Chula Vista police reserves to patrol Park Plaza at the Village
and the adjacent parking structure as an interim solution.
Council discussion included: this should be funded by the
Redevelopment Agency and not General Funds; Zogob should pay for
this and City could forgive debts incurred; questioned if this is
the most effective use of overtime.
Community Development Director Desrochers interjected Mr. Zogob
pays monthly fees to the City's General Fund and the Redevelopment
Agency pays the debt service on the structure.
Director of Public Safety Winters, in answer to Council's
questions, indicated the Police Department is not "strapped" for
personnel to work the overtime but questioned whether this is the
best ~se of overtime.
MSUC (Malcolm/McCandliss) continue this item to Thursday,
September 18, 1986 following the Redevelopment Agency meeting.
24. RESOLUTION 12727 APPROVING VARIANCE GRANTED BY THE BOARD OF
APPEALS & ADVISORS REGARDING SWIMMING POOL
FENCE AT 4080 BERMUDA DUNES PLACE (Acting
Director of Building & Housing)
MINUTES - 24 - September 16, 1986
A swimming pool was installed in 1965 at 4080 Bermuda Dunes Plan
(abutting the Municipal Golf Course). At that time, the 3' high
fence above the lot pad, 3-1/2 to 4 feet above the golf course
grade, was legal. Sometime in the early 1970s the required
fencing height was raised to five feet.
The owner now wishes to install a spa in the pool area and
appeared before the the Board of Appeals and Advisors on September
8, 1986. The Board unanimously approved the exemption from the 5'
high fencing requirements.
It was recommended Council accept the Board's findings and
recommendation for approval of the existing 3-1/2' high enclosure
and for the installation of a new spa.
RESOLUTION OFFERED BY COUNCILMAN MOORE, the reading of the text
was waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously.
MSUC (Cox/Malcolm) direct staff to prepare necessary changes (for
pool fencing appeal decisions to be considered by Board of Appeals
only and not City Council).
31. REPORT OF BOARDS/COMMISSIONS
a. RECOMMENDATION OF LIBRARY BOARD REGARDING FOUNTAIN - Suzanne
Miller, Chairperson
This item was in response to Council's request for the Library
Board to consider soliciting public funds for construction of
a Library water feature. It was proposed the Board conduct a
study arid make recommendatio~]s on alternate uses of this area
with a report to the City Council in four months.
City Manager Goss stated a report will be submitted to the
Council next week for a recommendation to reject the bids and
a scaled-down version of the fountain will be presented to the
Board to review.
MSUC (Cox/McCandliss) refer the scaled-down version of the
fountain to the LiDrary Board for a report back from the City
Manager.
32. REPORT OF THE CITY MANAGER - None.
33. MAYOR'S REPORT
a. UNANIMOUS CONSENT
RESOLUTION 12732 APPROVING A COMPENSATION PLAN FOR CERTAIN
UNCLASSIFIED EXECUTIVE EMPLOYEES OF THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA FOR FISCAL YEAR
1986-87 (City Manager)
MINUTES - 25 - September 16, 1986
This resolution involves the increases for the salaries for the
City Attorney, City Clerk and City Manager.
--,
RESOLUTION OFFERED BY COUNCILMAN MALCOLM, the reading of the text
was waived by unanimous consent, passed and approved unanimously.
b. MSUC (Cox/McCandliss) for a Closed Session (at the end of the
business meeting) to discuss pending litigation on the Section
404 permit.
34. COUNCIL COMMENTS
a. MSUC (McCandliss/Cox) docket for consideration the use of the
City logo for the Police patches.
b. City Attorney Harron announced that Assistant City Attorney
Gill has accepted a position with the law firm of McDonald,
Hecht & Solberg effective November 3, 1986.
c. [4ayor Cox noted Deputy City Clerk Sarmiento will be %~orking in
the Community Development Department as an Administrative
Analyst beginning September 19, 1986.
The Council recessed to Closed Session at 11:17 p.m. and
reconvened at 11:25 p.m.
ADJOURNMENT AT 11:25 p.m. to the meeting of Thursday, September
18, 1986 at 4 p.m. (preceding the Redevelopment Agency meeting)
and to Tuesday, September 23, 1986 at 7 p.m.
Deputy City Clerk
0871C
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) AFFIDAVIT OF POSTING ORDER
COUNTY OF SAN DIEGO ) ss OF ADJOURNMENT OF MEETING
CITY OF CHULA VISTA )
I, A~ele A. Sarmiento, being first duly sworn depose and say:
That I am the duly chosen, qualified and acting Deputy City Clerk
of the City Council of the City of Chula Vista.
That the regular meeting of the City Council of the
City of Chula Vista was held Tuesday, September 16, 1986
and said meeting was adjourned to the time and place specified in
the Order of Adjournment ATTACHED HERETO:
That on Wednesday, September 17 at the hour of 4 p.m.
I posted a copy of said order at a conspicuous place on or near the
door of the place at which said meeting of September 18, 1986
was held.
, f( ,,_
Adele A. Sarmien~o
Deputy City Clerk
Subscribed and sworn to before me this
and State of California
MINUTES OF AN ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING
OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CALIFOrnIA
Held Tuesday, September 16, 1986
The City Council met in the Council Chamber of the Public Services
Building, 276 Fourth Avenue on the above date at 7 p.m. with
the following:
Councilmen Present: Campbell, McCandliss, Cox, Malcolm~ Moore
Councilmen Absent: None
ADJOURNMENT
The Mayor adjourned the meeting until Thursday, September 18, 1986
at 4:00 p.m. in the Council]~a~d~Conference Room, City Hall/
~a~l~x~$~x~l~ 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula Vista, California.
preceding the Redevelopment Agency meeting.
I, Adele A. Sarmiento, Deputy City Clerk of the City of Chula Vista,
DO HEREBY CERTIFY that this is a full, true and correct copy of an
order by the City Council at the meeting of September 18, 1986
Adele A. Sarmiento
Deputy City Clerk
City of Chula Vista, California
1 ·