HomeMy WebLinkAboutAgenda Packet 1994/05/26
Thursday, May 26, 1994
4:00p.m.
". declare ",nder penalty of perJury that I am
employed by the City of Chula Vista in the
Office of the City Clerk and that I posled
this Agenda/Notice on the Iietin Board at
the PUbli~ se~ices Bu'ldin' t't Ha~ .
. <:::'" \ ill! ' '.' I Y n Council Conference Room
DATED, ~ C\ SIGNED .. Ad" . B 'Id'
mmtstrahon Ul mg
Soecial WorksessionlMeetin~ of the Citv of Chula Vis itv Council
CALL TO ORDER
1.
ROLL CALL:
Councilmembers Fox _, Horton _' Moore _' Rindone _' and
Mayor Nader _'
2.
REPORT
REVIEW AND CONSIDERATION OF THE GROWTH MANAGEMENT
OVERSIGHT COMMISSION'S (GMOC) 1993 ANNUAL REPORT - The
GMOC's 1993 Annual Report on the City's compliance with the Quality-of-Life
Thresholds Standards focuses on the period from 7/1192 to 6/30/93. Issues
identified in the second half of 1993 and early 1994 are also discussed. The
Chairman's cover memorandum to the Report provides a summary of the
GMOC's findings and recommendations, Staff recommends Council: (1)
Accept the 1993 GMOC Annual Report and recommendations contained therein;
(2) Direct staff to return to Council in July with an analysis and work program
to undertake actions necessary to implement those recommendations as
presented; and, (3) Direct staff to prepare the necessary Statements of Concern
for issuance by the Mayor regarding the Water and Air Quality Thresholds.
(Director of Planning)
3. REVIEW OF DEPARTMENTAL BUDGETS Personnel, Fire, and as many carry over items as
time permits.
ORAL COMMUNICATIONS
This is an opportunity for the general public to address the City CouncU on any subject matter within the
Council's jurisdiction that is not an item on this agenda. (State law, however, generally prohibits the City
CouncUfrom taking action on any issues not included on the posted agenda.) If you wish to address the CouncU
on such a subject, please complete the yellow "Request to Speak Under Oral Communications Fonn" available
in the labby and submit it to the City Clerk prior to the meeting. Those who wish to speak, please give your name
and address for record purposes andfollow up action. Your time is limited to three minutes per speaker.
OTHER BUSINESS
4. CITY MANAGER'S REPORTISl
a. Scheduling of meetings.
5. MAYOR'S REPORTISl
Agenda
-2-
May 26, 1994
6. COUNCIL COMMENTS
ADJOURNMENT
The meeting will adjourn to a Special Worksession/Meeting on Wednesday, June I, 1994 at 6:00 p.m. in the
Council Conference Room and thence to the Regular City Council Meeting on June 7, 1994 at 4:00 p.m. in the City
Council Chambers.
Notice is hereby given, pursuant to Government Code Section 54956, that the Mayor and City Council of the
City of Chula Vista has called and will convene a Special Worksession/Meeting of the City Council on Thursday,
May 26, 1994 at 4:00 p.m. in the Council Conference Room, Administration Building, 276 Fourth Avenue, Chula
Vista, CA.
* * * COMPLIANCE WITH AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT * * *
The City of Chula Vista, in complying with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), request individuals who
require special accommodation to access, attend, and/or participate in a City meeting, activity, or service request
such accommodation at least forty-eight hours in advance for meetings and five days for scheduled services and
activities. Please contact the City Clerk for specific information at (619) 691-5041. California Relay Service is
available for the hearing impaired.
JOINT MEETING
CHULA VISTA CITY COUNCIL
AND GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION
COUNCIL CONFERENCE AGENDA STATEMENT
Item ~
Meeting Date 5/26/94
ITEM TITLE: Review and Consideration of the Growth Management Oversight
Commission's (GMOC) 1993 Annual Report
SUBMITTED BY: Director of Planning ;r!!t
REVIEWED BV, City ...".g~ (41''''' V"'" V~_NoXJ
Attached is the GMOC's 1993 Annual Report on the City's compliance with the Quality-of-Life
Thresholds Standards. It focuses on the period from July I, 1992 to June 30, 1993, although
issues identified in the second half of 1993 and early 1994 are also discussed. The chairman's
cover memorandum to the Report provides a summary of the GMOC's findings and
recommendations. This workshop will give the GMOC an opportunity to discuss the Report's
findings and recommendations with the City Council.
The GMOC is scheduled to commence its next review in October 1994, and will focus on the
period from July I, 1993 to June 30, 1994.
RECOMMENDATIONS: That Council:
1. Accept the 1993 GMOC Annual Report and recommendations contained therein;
2. Direct staff to return to the City Council in July with an analysis and work program to
undertake actions necessary to implement those recommendations as presented in
Attachment C - "1993 GMOC Recommendations / Implementing Actions Summary".
3. Direct staff to prepare the necessary Statements of Concern for issuance by the Mayor
regarding the Water and Air Quality Thresholds.
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATIONS:
The Planning Commission, on May II, 1994, voted 6-0 (one member absent) to accept the 1993
GMOC Report and recommendations as presented, and to recommend that Council do the same.
9-.... )
Page 2, Item~
Meeting Date 5/26/94
DISCUSSION:
The GMOC approved their final 1993 Report and recommendations on April 28, 1994. In
summary, the GMOC found that the City is in compliance with the Threshold Standards for
Schools, Libraries, Sewer, Drainage, Fiscal, Traffic, and Parks and Recreation. The City is not
in compliance with the thresholds for Police and Fire/Emergency Medical service. The GMOC
recommends issuance of Statements of Concern for the Water and Air Quality thresholds.
Regarding non-compliance for the Police threshold, the shortfall was slight, and only related to
one of the two measures for Priority I (emergency) calls for service. Over the last 18 months,
the Police Department has implemented a variety of operational and managerial changes designed
to improve performance. The GMOC previously recognized that it would take time for those
changes to bring about improvement in threshold performance. Based on this year's
performance in comparison to the two prior years, those changes appear to be working. The
Police Department anticipates that threshold compliance will be achieved for the next reporting
period (July 1, 1993 to June 30, 1994).
Non-compliance for the Fire/EMS threshold appears to be the result of a change in the manner
of response time data collection, and not the result of a reduction in fire service levels for Fiscal
Year 1992-93. When the threshold was established in 1987, the Fire Department's semi-
automated dispatch system was not capable of recording the call intake and dispatch time
components of overall response. Call intake time was thereby not included with the 7 minute
standard, and a fixed 30 seconds was allocated for the dispatch component. The remaining 6
minutes and 30 seconds was allocated for the turnout and travel time components. In July,
1992, new automated communications equipment was installed in the Dispatch Center. That
system now captures the actual total response time, including the call intake and dispatch
components. The result is that response statistics for FY 1992-93 now include time frames
inconsistent with those represented in the present threshold standard. While this has produced
data indicative of non-compliance, the Fire Department was able to effectively show that turnout
and travel times remain largely unchanged from prior years, illustrating that the delivery of fire
and emergency medical services has not deteriorated. The Fire Department, in conjunction with
the Police Department, is proposing installation of a Computer Aided Dispatch and Records
Management System (CAD/RMS) to facilitate better management of resources, and to resolve
the present statistical inconsistencies in response time measurement.
The GMOC is also recommending that several of the Threshold Standards be reviewed for
possible revision including Police, Fire, Library, Air Quality, and Parks and Recreation.
The GMOC's Report, included as Attachment B, contains complete discussions on each
threshold topic, and related specific recommendations for Council action may be found within
the report in bold italic print, and denoted by "." markings. To assist the Council in
evaluating and acting upon the Report's many recommendations, a more concise summary of
recommendations and proposed Council implementing actions is presented in Attachment C.
Staff would request Council direction to return in July with an analysis and work program for
~-~
Page 3, Ite~
Meeting Date 5/26/94
responding to these recommended actions, due to the significant amount of staff work
represented in these recommendations, and the need to prioritize these activities in relation to
other projects and activities currently being undertaken by the affected departments.
FISCAL IMPACT: None at this time. Future implementing actions may have direct fiscal
impacts which will be identified when the work program is returned to Council in July.
Attachments:
A. Unofficial minntes of the May 11,1994 Planning Commission I GMOC workshop meeting'NOTSCANNEJ:
B. Chairman's cover memo and 1993 GMOC Annual Report.
C. 1993 GMOC Recommendations I Implementing Actions Summary
D. Appendices to the 1993 Annual Report.
(GMOC-93\grn93rpt.ccaJ
d-3
"
'.
.-
.
.
MEMORANDUM
May 4, 1994
TO: The Honorable Mayor and City Council
FROM: Growth Management Oversight Commission
SUBJECT: 1993 GMOC REPORT
It is again with pleasure that the GMOC presents its 1993 Report to the Mayor and City
Council. The Commission members are sensitive to their responsibility to provide the
Mayor and Council with a succinct report, consistent with adopted threshold standards.
In the process of providing orientation to new commission members, with regard to the
purpose and intent of the Commission, it was our perception that several of the thresholds
are due for review and possible revision. That perception was reinforced as we heard
from, and conversed with, City staff and extemal agencies providing reports to the
Commission. The need for change is based largely on the fact that; (1) the City's
population has grown from approximately 90,000 in 1985 to 147,500 today due to the
Montgomery annexation and growth, (2) the threshold standards are seven years old, and
(3) there have been significant technological advances which impact the delivery and
measurement of services. Therefore, the GMOC encourages the City Council to direct a
review of the Police, Fire, Air Quality, Library, and Parks. and Recreation thresholds.
As an overview of the 1993 Report conclusions, the following identifies those thresholds
found to either be complying or non-complying, and provides a brief summary of pertinent
issues in each respective threshold area:
1. The City is in compliance with the following Thresholds:
Schools
Libraries
Sewer
Drainage
Traffic
Fiscal
Parks and Recreation
On the basis of the school districts' indication of sufficient capacity to house new .
students, given the City's 12-18 month growth projections, the districts were found
to be in compliance. The GMOC remains concemed, however, about compliance
over the longer-term, and has therefore outlined in its recommendations several
actions necessary to address continued overcrowding and future growth. The City
cJ-1
(I
. I
,
.:;
.'
.'
Hubbard/GMOC
-2-
May 4, 1994
""""
and districts need to continue to work cooperatively to achieve full and equitable
mitigation of growth's impacts upon schools, particularly in westem Chula Vista
where opportunities for expansion are limited due to existing development.
With the planned completion of the 37,000 square foot South Chula Vista Library,
the City will meet and surpass the library threshold. Significant changes are being
brought about in the present and future delivery of library services through the use
of technology. This technology has the potential to bring about profound effects in
citizens library access, and in the storage and retrieval of infonnation. The GMOC
therefore feels it relevant and timely for the Library Board of Trustees to provide
input on the relationship of such changes to the library threshold standard.
Under the new San Diego Area Wastewater Management District (SDAWMD), the
City's future sewerage treatment capacity rights are not presently guaranteed as
they were under the prior Metro system. It is therefore being recommended that the
City retain its consulting team to guide the important decision to remain in, or leave
the SDAWMD, which must be made by July 1, 1994. That decision could
significantly affect the City's future approach to providing adequate sewerage
treatment capacity and water reclamation.
The GMOC continues to draw attention to the roughly 80 needed drainage
improvements west of 1-805, which under current funding conditions would take over ~.
20 years to complete. Similar to the identification by the Engineering Department
of the present 15 top priority projects, the City needs to establish an ongoing annual
program of prioritization and funding to assure timely completion of all 80+ projects.
Such an effort is envisioned as necessary to. ensure continued threshold
compliance.
The GMOC has identified 5 locations where potentially serious traffic threshold
compliance problems could occur within the next 5 to 10 years. Of those locations,
"H" Street both east and west of 1-805 continues to be of particular concern. It is
recommended that a focused study of these locations be conducted as described
in the report, with recommendations for proposed actions to ensure continued
threshold compliance over the longer-tenn. That report should be available to assist
the GMOC's review commencing in October, 1994.
The City has established a well-functioning Development Impact Fee (DIF) program
which has enabled maintenance of service levels commensurate with growth. The
GMOC, however, is concemed about the continued recession and ongoing State
budget cuts, and their implications to future staffing and service levels. In order to
identify those implications, it is recommended that a report be prepared to evaluate
the current reliance on one time revenues to balance the City's budget, and to
identify the potential short range impacts to services if such revenues are not
available, and the current economic climate continues.
--..
As endorsed by the City Council in 1992, the GMOC continues to encourage timely
e/(-.5
. ,
, .
.'.
.
.
Hubbard/GMOC
-3-
May 4, 1994
adoption of a revised Parks and Recreation threshold standard to achieve 3 acres
of parkland per 1000 population both east and west of 1-805, The GMOC is
concerned that despite demonstrated need, no parkland has been added in western
Chula Vista since inception of the Growth Management programs in 1987. It is
recommended that the City complete and act upon the Parks Implementation Plan
(PIP) currently being prepared by staff, The PIP is crucial to the ultimate provision
of needed facilities and services, and to completion of a revised threshold standard
for adoption.
2. The City is not in compliance with the following Thresholds:
Pollee
The threshold for Priority I (emergency) calls for service (CFS) was not fully met for
the third consecutive review period, although the shortfall was slight. Overall, CFS
volume has risen by more than 20% in the last three years. Reports indicated that
the present record keeping systems do not enable data management which can
quantify whether these CFS increases are growth related. Without a good handle
on the pattems and other aspects of increased CFS, it is difficult for the Police
Department and the GMOC to determine whether threshold performance issues will
continue to exist, or how to best structure and manage police resources in
combating crime and maintaining appropriate service levels. It is therefore
recommended that the City Council support timely implementation of the proposed
Computer Aided Dispatch and Records Management System (CAD/RMS), to
provide for proper management of police resources, and to enable the GMOC to
identify and quantify growth's impacts on the delivery of police services.
FirelEMS
Data indicates that the Fire Department has not met the minimum threshold
standard, however, other factors exist (beyond those originally included in
formulation of the standard) which alter the appearance of actual performance I
compliance. To resolve these inconsistencies, and the GMOC's concerns, it is
again recommended, as with police services, that the City Council support timely
implementation of the CADIRMS system which is a joint proposal of the Police and
Fire Departments.
3, The GMOC recommends that the City Council issue Statements of Concem for the
following threshold standards:
Water
Despite increased coordination and cooperation between the City and the two major
local water districts, the GMOC remains concemed about long-term water
availability, dependance on Imported water supply, and the need for development
of adequate future storage, and reclamation and other altemative water sources to
,;( - G..
. .
Hubbard/GMOC
-4-
May 4, 1994
-,,'
meet the needs of future growth. Consistent with the many issues outlined in the
report, the Inter Agency Water Task Force (IAWTF) continues to provide an
excellent forum in which to address these matters of mutual concern.
Air Quality
Although the San Diego Region continued to experience improvement in overall air
quality during 1993, an acceptable level of air quality has not yet been achieved.
Implementation of the APCD's adopted Regional Air Quality Strategy (AQS) and its
various measures such as the TCM and TDM Plans, and a forthcoming Indirect
Source Reduction Plan are crucial to continued air quality improvement, and should
be encouraged and fully supported by the City. Additionally, and based on repeated
input from the APCD, it is recommended that the air quality threshold standard be
revised to achieve better coordination with the APCD and SANDAG, and in
implementing provisions of the AQS. The City Council should authorize formation
of a task force to develop a draft revised standard for GMOC consideration with its
review commencing in October, 1994.
The GMOC commends the School, Water and Air Pollution Control Districts, and the
various City departments for their continued cooperation in working with the Commission.
We are most appreciative of the outstanding support from the Planning Department, and ..........
in particular Ed Batchelder.
Sincerely,
~
~/~$ ~~
Tris Hu bard
Chairman, GMOC
(GMOc.I3\RPT -CO\IR.MEM)
-..
,2-7
.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION
1993 REPORT
.
.
SUBMITTED
MAY 1994
.
.J.-~
-...
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION
1993 REPORT
Commission Members
Tris Hubbard, Chairman (Education)
Elizabeth Allen, Vice Chairman (Montgomery)
Will T. Hyde (Environmental)
Chuck Peter (Business)
Thomas Martin (Planning Commission)
Mike Armbrust (Center City)
James Langius (Development)
James Kell (Eastern Territories)
Carol "Lynn" Dull ~weetwater)
~
Staff
Edgar Batchelder, Associate Planner
May 1994
........
.:2-9
.
.
.
TODie
Introduction
Process
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Development Forecasts
Threshold/Annual Review Summary
Annual Review of Thresholds
Police
Fire
Water
Air Quality
Schools
Libraries
Sewer
Drainage
Fiscal
Traffic
Parks and Recreation
ADD8ndlx
A.
B.
C.
D.
E.
F.
G.
H.
Police Department Memorandum I.
Fire Department Memorandum
Water District Communications J.
APCD Communications
School District Communications K.
Library Memorandum
Engineering Sewer and Drainage Reports
Engineering Traffic Reports
c:2-/0
Paae
1
2
2
5
6
9
11
16
20
28
30
33
35
38
42
Finance Department
Memorandum
Parks and Recreation
Department Memorandum
Development Forecast
Report
GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION
""""
1993 REPORT
May 1, 1993
INTRODUCTION
In November 1987, through the input of citizens and developers, the City Council adopted
the Threshold/Standards Policy for Chula Vista. Eleven public facility and service issues
are addressed by the Policy, and each is discussed in terms of a goal, objectives,
"threshold" or standard, and implementation measures. The Standards form the backbone
of an overall growth management program for the City which has evolved since 1987
through adoption of a Growth Management Element of the General Plan in 1989, and a
Growth Management Program document and Implementing Ordinance in 1991. Adherence
to these Citywide Standards is intended to preserve and enhance public facilities and
services, the environment, and the quality-of-Iife of Chula Vista residents as growth occurs.
To provide an independent annual City-wide Threshold/Standards compliance review, a
Growth Management Oversight Committee (GMOC) was created. The Committee was
appointed by the City Council in the summer of 1988. It is composed of nine members
representing a geographical balance of residents as well as a cross section of interest
including education, environmental, business and development. There is also
representation by the Planning Commission. In April of 1991, the City Council changed i
the designation of the Committee to the Growth Management Oversight Commission. As
Commission vacancies occur they should be filled reflecting the geographic or special
interest designation which they represent.
The responsibilities of the Commission in conducting its annual review include the
following:
a determination of whether the thresholds have been complied with on both a
project and cumulative basis over the prior year;
whether compliance is likely to be maintained based on both short-term and long-
term development forecasts;
whether each threshold is appropriate for its goal;
whether any new thresholds should be adopted for any issues;
whether any new issues should be added to or deleted from the threshold group;
whether the City has been using developer fees for the intended purpose;
what the fiscal impact of threshold compliance may be; and
whether the means of compliance are appropriate and being achieved.
Development projects in Chula Vista are required to demonstrate that the Threshold
Standards will be maintained as growth occurs. Each project is reviewed, and
appropriately conditioned to assure that needed facilities and services are in place in
advance of, or concurrent with proposed development. This "concurrency" policy
""""
1
Ol. -/ /
.
.
.
promotes the continuation of a high quality-of-Iife for existing as well as future city
residents.
PROCESS
The Growth Management Oversight Commission (GMOC) held a series of 8 meetings from
December 1993 through April 1994. The Commission spent the first meeting reviewing the
City Council's actions on the 1992 GMOC Report and recommendations, and in reviewing
the established thresholds and Commission responsibilities as an orientation for new
members. The next 5 meetings were spent reviewing the growth forecasts and the
threshold policies, and in determining compliance with those policies based on reports
which were submitted by both individual City departments and external agencies.
Presentations of the reports were made by representatives of the Sweetwater and Otay
water districts, Chula Vista Elementary and Sweetwater Union High school districts, the
San Diego County Air Pollution Control District, and City staff including Engineering, Traffic
Engineering, Parks and Recreation, Library, Fire, Police, Finance, and Planning. The
GMOC reviewed each threshold and determined whether or not it was appropriate to issue
a statement of concem or make other recommendations regarding that threshold.
Following completion of the individual threshold reviews, the GMOC prepared, reviewed
and adopted this annual report to the Planning Commission and City Council.
The GMOC's review is structured around a fiscal year cycle, whereby the Commission is
scheduled to commence activity in October (reviewing the prior fiscal year), and completing
an annual report in about February. This particular review cycle is intended to allow the
GMOC report to be available concurrent with the commencement of City budget
deliberations for the coming fiscal year. Such an approach accommodates consideration
by the City Council of any GMOC recommendations which may have budget implications.
The official review period for this report is July 1, 1992 through June 30, 1993. However,
any issues identified during the second half of 1993 and early in 1994 are also addressed
in this report as appropriate. The next GMOC review period will begin in October, 1994,
and address the period from July 1, 1993 through June 30, 1994.
DEVELOPMENT FORECASTS
The Threshold/Standards Policy calls for City staff to prepare both short-range (12 to 18
month) and mid-range (5 to 7 years) development forecasts at the beginning of the annual
GMOC review process. Complimentary to threshold performance evaluation over the prior
year period, these forecasts serve to provide a common basis by which the GMOC, staff
and external agencies can identify and address future potential threshold concerns before
a problem arises. The forecasts were prepared in July 1993 in coordination with
SANDAG's Series 8 Regional Forecast efforts, and distributed to the respective agencies
and City departments for evaluation and report back to the GMOC. A copy of the Planning
Department's forecast report is included as Appendix K.
2
~-/~
12-18 Month Forecast
.-.,
In response to the ongoing recession and current economic climate, the forecast figures
consist of a range with a low end and high end. The low end is based primarily on a 24-
month trend analysis of prior construction activity during the last half of 1991, all of 1992,
and the first half of 1993, and forecasts 669 dwelling units to be permitted for construction
and 861 dwelling units to reach occupancy over the 18 month period from July 1993
through December 1994. The high end forecast primarily reflects the local development
community's anticipated construction schedules, and projects 1.696 dwelling units to be
permitted for construction and 1.770 dwelling units to reach occupancy over the same
period. The apparently large variant in the forecast range reflects the continued
uncertainty as to the pace of recessionary recovery, the regaining of consumer confidence
in an unstable job market, and the availability of development I construction financing in
the wake of the S & L failures. By comparison, residential development activity levels in
both 1992 and 1993 were about one half of average annual levels experienced during the
later 1980's. Local economists are predicting only a modest increase in housing unit
authorizations on a county-wide basis during 1994, as compared to 1993.
5-7 Year Forecast
As noted earlier, a new mid-range forecasting methodology consistent with the SANDAG
draft Series 8 forecast model, has again been used for this forecast. The City's intent in
coordinating the mid-range (5-7 year) forecast with Series 8, is to further improve
forecasting methodology consistent with the regional and sub-regional models, and to allow """'\
for easier and more consistent updates of these forecasts. In doing so, the same
assumptions utilized in the Series 8 forecast for projecting future growth and development
in the region are applied locally to the City's forecast. These assumptions include, but are
not limited to, population trends, economic trends, and infrastructure needs.
The Series 8 model also considers the remaining development potential of all lands. both
vacant and infill, within the greater San Diego Region and its subregions. Because of this,
local planning efforts, such as those related to public facility planning, will benefit from the
City's forecast being linked to the regional forecast, as it provides the City the ability to
consider the impact of all projects within and adjacent to our Planning Area. This revised
local forecasting approach will also enable the City to more accurately anticipate long-
range public facility needs, and to address necessary preplanning by the development
community in concert with the policies of the City and other affected govemment agencies.
The forecast publication is attached as an Appendix K to this report, and provides a full
description of this improved approach.
Similar to the 12-18 month forecast, a low and high-end range were again used. City-wide,
during the next five to seven years, the average annual number of dwelling units expected
to be completed ranges from a low of 1.059 to a high of 1.485. These annual averages
reflect increased activity levels in the latter years of the forecast (post 1995) associated
with a general shift in county-wide development patterns, and the projected
commencement of construction in Otay Ranch. This forecast also takes into consideration
.-.,
3
d2 -/ :3
.
.
.
known facility capacity limitations, particularly those related to traffic circulation and the
proposed State Route 125 phasing and financing study.
While a majority of the forecast is attributable to growth in eastem Chula Vista, the figures
do reflect approximately 150 dwe!ling units per y~ar of infill devel!'pment in westem Chula
Vista based primarily on an analysis of historic trends. ..
~
<. 4r.
{" <>
f
,,/ .",./ r
.'" f,'
",
4
~ -/7'
~
~
:&
:;)
II)
~
w
:>
w
III:
...I
<
:;)
Z
C')z
"'<
"'.
....
...IC C
C..Jwz
j:OClW
Z:l:Z:&
W(/)C:&
I-w:l:O
0111:00
IL:I: W
I- III:
(/)
COWw
Z->O
...l-wZ
....O-C
I- ~ O:l:::::i
IL IL
OCC:&
CZOO
C:::II-O
l&.
l&.
OO~O W
I-I-IDI-WO
ffiil!!iii > 1:l:i
:&wzoS:::::i
~o~iliolL
e(~(/)ClC~
l-oll!C 0
(/)
II)
C
III:
<
C
Z
~
II)
C
...I
o
:I:
II)
W
III:
:I:
I-
CW
...10
O:il-
:I:-w
(/)...1_
WIL_
111::&
i=8
""'"".
.'"'\
III .
~ .c
Cl
~ :I s:
'C 1> c
0 II C
.c 'C E 0
:; .. II C
C Q ii:i :::I c
0
.. .. ! .. ;=
.!l .!l I ..
w i ~ :> e
:::I ~
(/) ..
~ ; g :; !
~ .c 'l:l
(/) (/) ii .. 0 .. II C
:& II Cl ..
II W .. '" '8 'C .. .. ii CO ~
.2 .!l a l! ! c E
I .c e! co
'0 ~ .. co .l:l .. l! ..
IL ii: oi ... :c (/) oi ... :::i (/) C ii: l- lL
ci """"
N ..; .; iii .0 too: aci ,,; ...
... ... ...
;1-15
.
.
.
-ANNUAL REVIEW OF THRESHOLDS-
THRESHOLDS REFLECTING STATEMENTS OF CONCERN OR NON-COMPLIANCE
a POLICE -
THE GMOC FINDS THAT THE CITY IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE POLICE
THRESHOLD STANDARD. ALTHOUGH THE SHORTFALL WAS SLIGHT. AND
PERFORMANCE IS SIGNIFICANTLY IMPROVED OVER LAST YEAR. THE CITY
SHOULD CONTINUE TO CLOSELY MONITOR THIS THRESHOLD IN THE NEAR
FUTURE.
When the GMOC reviewed the threshold standard last year, the Police Department
had recently come under new administration, and a variety of operational and
managerial changes designed to improve performance were being implemented.
In large part, those changes were in response to the two prior years of non-
conformance with the threshold standard (Fiscal Years '90-'91 and '91-'92). At that
time, the GMOC recognized that it would take time for the changes to bring about
improvement in threshold performance. Those changes have now been operational
for approximately 18 months, and based on this year's performance (FY '92-'93),
appear to be working. However, despite improved performance, the Department
again did not achieve full conformance with the standard. While both measures for
Priority II Calls for Service (CFS) were met, only one of the two measures for
Priority I CFS was met as follows:
Priority I Calls for Service (PI CFSl-
The threshold for Priority I (emergency) CFS requires that 84% of these calls
be responded to within 7 minutes, with an average response time of 4.5
minutes or less measured annually. The actual performance for FY 1992-93
indicates that 84.2% of all Priority I calls were responded to within 7 minutes,
but with an average response time of 4.7 minutes (5.2% below the standard).
As a measure of improvement, the performance figures for FY '91-'92 were
81.2% of PI CFS within 7 minutes, with an average response time of 4.9
minutes.
Priority II Calls for Service (PII CFSl-
The threshold for Priority II (urgent) CFS requires that 62% of these calls be
responded to within 7 minutes, with an average response time of 7 minutes
or less measured annually. The actual performance for FY 1992-93
indicates that 64.2% of all PII CFS were responded to within 7 minutes, with
an average response time of 6.33 minutes. The data indicates that the
threshold for PII CFS is being met.
6 ;2-/1,
While the GMOC considers the shortfall to be a modest deficiency, we none-the-
less remain concerned since this is third consecutive year in which Police
performance has been very near, or below, the minimum acceptable standard.
Additionally, it is difficult for the GMOC to pinpoint causes and recommend remedial
actions, as no conclusive evidence exists to indicate that matter is attributable to
growth. The Department's written and verbal reports indicated that the present
record keeping systems do not enable data management in a fashion which can
readily quantify whether increases in CFS are growth related. Overall, CFS volume
has risen by more than 20% over the last 3 fiscal years, with a trend in annual
increase between 5% and 9%.
""""
Without a good handle on the patterns and other aspects of increased CFS within
the City, it is difficult for the Police Department and the GMOC to determine whether
threshold performance issues will continue to exist, or how best to structure and
manage police resources in combating crime and maintaining appropriate service
levels. In these regards, the Department has emphasized the importance of
technological enhancements through a Computer Aided Dispatch and Records
Management System (CAD/RMS). The proposed CAD/RMS system provides
numerous benefits, and would also serve the Fire Department. Such systems have
been successfully implemented in other jurisdictions within the San Diego Region,
and have shown to be an invaluable tool. City staff have been working on the
present CAD/RMS project proposal since 1992, and are currently preparing the final
benefit/cost analysis. Additionally, staff is developing alternative project funding
sources and financing methodologies for review by the City Manager. Staff expects
that the City Council will receive a Supplemental Budget Report in late May, 1994,
discussing a wide range of policy considerations associated with system
implementation, along with staff's recommendations on how to fund and finance the
proposed project. Therefore, the GMOC recommends:
""""
. That the City Council support timely implementation of the
proposed CAD/RMS system, including necessary funding
techniques and allocations. The CAD/RMS system will, for the
first time, enable the GMOC to identify and quantify growth's
impacts on the delivery of police service.
The GMOC highlights the importance of the proposed CAD/RMS system to the
future of managing police service and response times. If only existing techniques
/ systems remain in place, the GMOC foresees continuation of the present inability
to identify and quantify growth's impacts on the delivery of police services. In
addition, given the post-implementation time window necessary for any new system
to produce worthwhile indicators and/or measurable results, the GMOC also
recommends:
. That re-evaluation of the Police Threshold Standard occur
approximately one year subsequent to implementation of the
CAD/RMS system. It is anticipated that at least one year of
7
"""'\
- .2-17
.
CAD/RMS statistics will be necessary to determine if current
issues influencing police performance can be solved through
managerial techniques, or if an alteration of the current Standard
Is warrented. Assuming the CAD/RMS system Is In place by the
end of 1994, the GMOC would consider the threshold standard
for revision In their annual review commencing October, 1995.
Beyond the CAD/RMS proposal, the Police Department is also embarking on a
multi-faceted proactive policing effort under the well grounded philosophy that it is
more effective in the long run to prevent crime than to respond to calls for service.
Examples of su'ch efforts include:
1) The Street Team comprised of 5 swom officers devoted to preventing street
crimes such as robberies and drug dealing;
2) The Gang Unit comprised of 4 sworn officers to provide enhanced police
presence within the gang community by patrolling places gang members are
known to congregate;
3) The Regional Auto Theft Task Force (RATT) and the Tactical Action Cargo
Theft Team (TACT) comprised of 1 sergeant and 2 agents specializing in
reducing auto thefts and the theft of trucking industry cargo;
.
4)
The School Resource Officer (SRO) Program that assigns sworn officers to
local high schools on a full-time basis; and
5) The Police Activities League (PAL) which provides youth with a variety of
healthy alternatives to criminal behavior and/or gang membership.
The Department has also implemented a Sworn Staffing Overhire Program, which
qualifies recruits before they are needed. This enables the Department to come
closer to fully staffing existing positions during the course of the year given the
amount of turnover that occurs in a department with more than 240 persons. Taken
together, the Department projects that the previously noted efforts will result in
improved response time data, and attainment of threshold compliance for the next
reporting period (July 1, 1993 through June 30, 1994).
.
8 ~ -I ft
a
FIRE/EMS -
~
THE GMOC FINDS THAT THE CITY IS NOT IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE
FIRE/EMS THRESHOLD STANDARD. IT APPEARS. HOWEVER. THAT THIS
NON-COMPLIANCE IS A REFLECTION OF A CHANGE IN THE MANNER OF
DATA COLLECTION. AND NOT A REDUCTION OF FIRE SERVICE LEVELS FOR
FISCAL YEAR 1992-93
The threshold standard requires that 85% of all emergency fire and medical calls
be responded to within 7 minutes. Response statistics presented for Fiscal Year
1992-93 indicate that only 78% of all emergency calls were responded to within 7
minutes. Although this data appears to indicate that the Fire Department has not
met the minimum threshold standard, other factors exist (beyond those originally
included in formulation of the standard) which alter the appearance of actual
performance/compliance.
There are three major components of response time: Dispatch time; Tumout time;
and Travel time. Dispatch time is the time required to receive a call for service (call
intake time) and to dispatch an emergency vehicle to the incident. Turnout time is
the time required by fire personnel to leave the fire station after receipt of the
dispatch instructions. Travel time is the time taken to drive to the incident location.
When the 7 minute threshold standard was developed in 1987, the Fire Department
had a semi-automated computer dispatch system which did not record call intake '"""
or call dispatching times. During call intake (which is a sub-component of Dispatch
time), the time needed to gather relevant information varies considerably from call-
to-call. Thereby, staff could not establish a meaningful call intake time, and that
component was therefore not included in the threshold standard. Conversely, there
is generally only a small degree of variance in the time needed to actually dispatch
(via radio transmission) a call to the station. As such, a fixed dispatch time of 30
seconds was established as part of the 7 minute standard. The remaining 6
minutes and 30 seconds was ascribed for turnout and travel time, based largely on
the then average time taken for these two components; the intent stemming from
the public consensus that current service levels were adequate, and should not be
allowed to deteriorate.
In July, 1992 (the beginning of the present threshold review period), new
communications equipment was installed in the Dispatch Center. The system now
captures the actual total dispatch time, including the call intake component. The
resulting effect to threshold performance measurement is that available statistics
now include time factors in the overall response time statistics which were not
included in the current threshold standard. These are call intake time frames which
were never included, and actual dispatch times vs. the flat 30 seconds. As a result,
the GMOC has concluded that it does not have before it statistical performance
measurements consistent with the threshold standard's present structure. In this
light, the Fire Department was able to effectively show that tumout and travel times
9 .:< -/9
"'"'"
.
remain largely unchanged from prior years, illustrating that delivery of fire and
emergency medical services has not deteriorated.
Toward resolving this statistical inconsistency, the Fire Department has indicated
that the present dispatch system is not technically capable of separating out the call
intake and dispatch components. They are, however, presently working in
conjunction with the Police Department on implementation of a new Computer Aided
Dispatch and Records Management System (CADIRMS). The CAD/RMS system
will provide a wealth of operational and managerial enhancements which will directly
benefit overall response times, including the ability to statistically separate all
components of overall response time, and for the first time, allow the direct
evaluation of growth's impacts on the delivery of services. City staff have been
working on the present CAD/RMS project proposal since 1992, and are currently
preparing the final benefit/cost analysis. Additionally, staff is developing altemative
project funding sources and financing methodologies for review by the City
Manager. Staff expects that the City Council will receive a Supplemental Budget
Report in late May, 1994, discussing a wide range of policy considerations
associated with system implementation, along with staff's recommendations on how
to fund and finance the proposed project. Therefore, the GMOC recommends:
.
That the City Council approve, and appropriate necessary funding for,
the proposed CAD/RMS system which will Improve services, and enable
the Fire Department to evaluate its response time performance In
correcting present statistical inconsistencies, and in determining
whether any changes to the Threshold Standard are needed.
The GMOC highlights its understanding that if only existing systems remain in
place, there will be a continuation of the present inability to evaluate threshold
performance consistent with the provisions of the current standard. Given the post-
implementation time windows typically necessary for any new system to produce
worthwhile indicators and/or measurable results, the GMOC also recommends:
.
. That a comprehensive review of the Fire Threshold be undertaken
approximately one year subsequent to Implementation of the CAD/RMS
system. It is anticipated that at least one year of CAD/RMS statistics
will be necessary in resolving present measurement inconsistencies,
and in determining If any alteration of the current standard Is
warranted. Assuming the CAD/RMS system Is In place by the end of
1994, the GMOC would consider the threshold standard for revision In
their annual review commencing October, 1995.
In the interim, it will be important to maintain full staffing in the Communications
Center to ensure maximum efficiency during peak demand periods for both fire and
police calls.
.
10 d~,;J.O
a
WATER -
""'"
THE GMOC FINDS THAT BOTH THE SWEETWATER AUTHORITY AND OTAY
WATER DISTRICT HAVE SUFFICIENT WATER SUPPLY AND AVAILABILITY TO
MEET THE NEEDS OF LOCAL GROWTH OVER THE NEXT 12 TO 18 MONTHS.
AND ARE THEREFORE IN COMPLIANCE WITH THAT ASPECT OF THE WATER
THRESHOLD STANDARD.
THE GMOC. HOWEVER. REMAINS CONCERNED ABOUT LONG-TERM WATER
AVAILABILITY. DEPENDANCE ON IMPORTED SUPPLY. AND THE NEED FOR
DEVELOPMENT OF ADEQUATE FUTURE STORAGE. RECLAMATION AND
OTHER ALTERNATIVE WATER SOURCES. AND RECOMMENDS THAT THE
CITY COUNCIL ISSUE A STATEMENT OF CONCERN TO BOTH THE
SWEETWATER AUTHORITY AND THE OTAY WATER DISTRICT.
While the GMOC is concerned about the potentially serious situation regarding
longer-term water supply, we want to acknowledge both Otay Water District and
Sweetwater Authority for their responsiveness in addressing prior GMOC concerns
regarding shorter-term supply and storage issues, and for their continuing efforts in
these regards. Of particular note is the ongoing development of very positive
coordination and cooperation with the City to mutually address water matters
through the Inter Agency Water Task Force (IAWTF).
Both the Sweetwater Authority and the Otay Water District again provided the """'"
GMOC with thorough written and oral reports, and individually and jointly are
undertaking a variety of efforts toward planning for sufficient delivery and storage
systems to meet the demands of forecasted growth. Some pertinent highlights of
those efforts are:
1) Both agencies continue to promote and develop water conservation
programs applied to both existing users and new development.
2) Sweetwater Authority is continuing to work closely with the City on the
Bayfront project to ensure appropriate infrastructure planning and upgrades
occur.
3) Sweetwater Authority continues to work toward diversifying its supply and
storage programs to reach a 50% non-dependance goal on imported water
through several efforts including: a brackish groundwater desalinization
project within the Lower Sweetwater Valley for .which an EIR is presently
being prepared; studying, through the CWA, the storage of surplus water in
groundwater aquifers by using injection/extraction wells in the San Diego
formation; and evaluating increase of the storage capacity of Sweetwater
Reservoir. Otay Water District is also participating in the funding of the CWA
study of the San Diego formation for groundwater or recharge potential.
"""\
11 .2 -.;2./
.
4)
Both agencies continue to coordinate with the CWA on the construction of
Pipeline No.4, expected to be completed by January 1997. This second
pipeline to serve the South Bay will increase the treated water delivery
capacity to Otay Water District, and generally provide additional water
delivery reliability to both districts in .the instance of planned or unplanned
shutdowns of the present one pipeline.
5) The CWA is undertaking a variety of efforts to improve the reliability of the
region's water supply system in the instance of repeated drought, or
sustained delivery interruptions from the Metropolitan Water District (MWD).
Part of this includes MWD's acquisition of a large reservoir site in the
Riverside County area.
6) Otay Water is continuing to develop a sufficient storage and supply network
to meet the demands of new development, and in accordance with CWA
goals, to sustain a 10 day independence in the event that potable water
deliveries by CWA to Otay are interrupted by planned or emergency
aqueduct shutdowns. Otay has completed a study entitled "Emergency
Water Supply Options" outlining the following potentially viable options:
an agreement with the City of San Diego for storage and treatment
capacity in Lower Otay Reservoir;
.
an agreement with Helix Water District for treatment capacity at their
Levy facility in conjunction with the CWA and Padre Dam Municipal
Water District;
storage in San Vincente Reservoir and paper transfer agreements
with CWA and Helix between San Vincente and EI Capitan Reservoir;
a cooperative agreement which could allow Otay Water to use
Sweetwater Reservoir as an emergency source of supply.
Sweetwater Authority has prepared a report dated May 1989 outlining
requirements and costs to accomplish such. Additionally, the two
districts are continuing to explore development of a conjunctive use
groundwater project in the Middle Sweetwater River Basin which
could yield as much as 1000 acre feet per year of storage capacity for
Otay Water. .
7) Otay is presently updating its District Master Plan which will incorporate the
above concepts of water storage and supply from neighboring districts, along
with other proposed capital improvements designed to meet the needs of
projected local growth. A draft of that plan should be available in summer
1994.
.
12 ,,; -/l.:L
,: J
'1 .'
.,!\
)"
8)
Regarding reclaimed water, Otay continues to pursue the development of
reclaimed water facilities and piping networks in new developments, and
supports the construction of the reclaimed water treatment plant proposed
in the Otay River Valley. That plant was originally included as part of the
Clean Water Program, and slated for start-up in 1998, although the City of
San Diego has since indefinitely postponed work on all reclamation plants in
the Clean Water Program. The Otay Valley plant is a significant local facility
in that it would provide reclaimed water for these newly built distribution
facilities.
1
Relatedly, Sweetwater Authority is not currently considering the use of
reclaimed water due to the probability that it will not be available in the
foreseeable future. However, they would support a treatment plant such as
that proposed in the Otay Valley. The GMOC is concerned with such a
position in that the future reality of reclaimed water is largely contingent on
the proactive efforts of concerned parties to make it a reality. Efforts are
needed to establish and coordinate common goals and strategies among the
two local districts and the City regarding the future of reclaimed water use.
The IAWTF presents an excellent forum in which to accomplish such.
9)
Otay Water's 30 million gallon underground reservoir in Eastlake Greens is
scheduled for completion in summer 1994. Regarding concerns expressed
last year over the location of proposed reservoirs within the City, the
previously noted District Master Plan will serve to coordinate future siting.
The need for such coordination is necessary in order to resolve
environmental concerns, and to maximize the opportunity for other land uses
which could be precluded by the reservoir facilities.
~
The District has also drilled an approximately 900 foot deep exploratory well
at the Eastlake Greens reservoir site. This well may produce about 50
gallons per minute.
10) Representatives of both Districts are continuing to meet with the City and
other interested parties to address issues of joint concern through the
IAWTF, including state-wide water matters which may impact development
within Chula Vista.
As previously noted, despite these exemplary efforts of both water districts to ensure
adequate water supply and delivery to meet the needs of short-term growth, and to reduce
dependency on imported water supplies, long-term water supply for Chula Vista remains
an issue which merits a Statement of Concern. Even with last year's pronounced end to
the drought, the amount and reliability of imported water for Chula Vista and Southern
California is still a problem given the tenuous nature of the Colorado River and State water
projects. In fact, early reports seem to indicate that we may be entering another "drought"
year given less than average snowfall in the Sierra and southern Rocky Mountains,
"""\
13 c2-t!l3
.
.
.
coupled with decreasing allocations from Arizona. Therefore, the GMOC recommends the
following actions be taken relating to this issue:
. That the City Council actively encourage and support, and accordingly
allocate staff time to, efforts Involving the development of physical and
operational programs on the part of the CWA and both local water
districts which reduce dependance on Imported water supply. Such
current efforts would Include:
. Rekindling support and planning activity for a seawater
demineralization plant which would provide a steady alternate
water supply within San Diego County.
. Direct that staff of the City Public Works Department continue
evaluating the feasibility of Chula Vista and other Interested
parties financing, designing and constructing the proposed
reclamation plant In the Otay River Valley which has been
Indefinitely postponed under the Clean Water Program. This
vital plant would provide a steady supply of reclaimed water for
use In landscape Irrigation and other appropriate applications
which reduce current potable water use.
.
Refer to the IA WTF the matter of developing and coordinating
common goals and strategies among the two water districts and
the City regarding the development of reclaimed water, with a
report back to the GMOC for consideration with the threshold
review cycle commencing In October 1994.
. Actively support development of local groundwater projects,
such as that presently being proposed by the Sweetwater
Authority within the Lower Sweetwater Valley, and others by Otay
Water District.
Also of concern for the City of Chula Vista is the provision of water storage for emergency
purposes. While positive activities were previously noted, both the County Water Authority
as a whole and the Otay Water District are still lacking adequate emergency water storage
facilities at this time. Of particular issue with the GMOC is Otay Water's present 10-day
emergency storage policy. That policy calls for 5 days to be achieved through cooperative
arrangements with neighboring districts, and 5 days in covered reservoirs. It has come to
the GMOC's attention that the 10 days assumes a maximum of 50% voluntary
conservation by water users, and thereby effectively results in the District only planning for
2 peak days of new reservoir storage. The remainder of the 5 days results from the
inclusion of operational storage as part of emergency storage. The GMOC was not
previously aware of this, and believes others may not be as well. Although not water
planning authorities, the GMOC is concerned in that we believe prudence would dictate
14 ..2-:z~
'n
t.
that a full 5 days of storage be planned, and not conservation down factored. In this way, -"'""\
should a major problem such as earthquake occur, the area could then sustain a longer
outage by applying conservation to take us beyond the 5 days. If the cost of new
reservoirs is a significant force behind the District's present policy approach, then perhaps
the District may want to consider altering their present 5/5 policy to consider a greater
emphasis on cooperative arrangements with neighboring districts.
The GMOC recommends that the City Council take the following actions relating to
emergency storage issues:
. Refer to the IAWTF the matter of Otay Water District's present
emergency storage policy for discussion and clarification. As part of
that discussion, consider the benefits/detriments of altering the
District's present policy decision to provide for only 2 days of new
emergency storage in covered reservoirs as part of its 10 day goal.
. Request that the Otay Water District continue to work closely with the
City during the preparation of the District's present master plan update,
particularly as it relates to the evaluation of future sites for proposed
emergency storage reservoirs within the City's General Plan Area.
.
Urge the Otay Water District to actively see through to completion
efforts to diversffy its storage and emergency supply options through
the previously noted cooperative efforts with other districts.
-"'""\
. Continue to urge the County Water Authority to speed construction of
emergency storage reservoirs in San Diego County.
While not a concern directed at supply or storage, last year the GMOC noted the City
needs to increase coordination with the Sweetwater Authority regarding advance planning
of water facility upgrades to support rezonings and infill development, particularly in the
northwestern quadrant of the City. Currently, many smaller developers and property
owners are faced with insurmountable costs when informed by the District at the building
permit review stage of the often substantial improvements necessary to replace existing
small diameter cast iron pipes to meet the required fire flow demands. Better advance
coordination would facilitate an applicant's understanding of improvement costs, and ways
to address them early in the development review process. While the Authority notes
communication has improved somewhat, the GMOC recommends:
. That the City Council refer this matter to the Engineering, Planning,
Fire, and Building and Housing Departments to ensure that a consistent
process of early referral to Sweetwater Authority is In place for projects
which will increase demands on water supply infrastructure in the
northwestern quadrant of the City.
-"'""\
15 .:l. -..?5
.
.
.
a
AIR QUALITY -
THE GMOC FINDS THAT DESPITE ONGOING IMPROVEMENT OF THE
REGION'S OVERALL AMBIENT AIR QUALITY. THE REGION STILL DOES NOT
MEET STATE AND FEDERAL STANDARDS FOR AIR QUALITY. AND
RECOMMENDS THAT THE CITY COUNCIL ISSUE A STATEMENT OF CONCERN
TO THE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL DISTRICT.
THE GMOC ALSO FINDS. BASED ON THE REPEATED INPUT OF THE APCD.
THAT THE CITY'S PRESENT AIR QUALITY THRESHOI-D STANDARD IS NOT
ENTIRELY FUNCTIONAL. AND RECOMMENDS THAT THE STANDARD BE
REVISED TO ACHIEVE BETTER COORDINATION WITH THE APCD AND
SANDAG.
The Air Pollution Control District (APCD) once again provided the GMOC with a
voluminous and thorough written and oral reports. The materials consisted of a
variety of handouts on pollution sources, violators and enforcement actions in Chula
Vista during 1993, APCD's 1992 Annual Report on air quality and 1993 Scorecard,
the APCD's 1993 Annual Progress Report on the Regional Air Quality Strategy
(AQS), report on the change in smog designation for the San Diego Region,
employer trip reduction regulation, January 1994 AirNews publication, and a copy
of AB2008 (Alpert) regarding smog check requirements for Mexican vehicles used
in commuting to the San Diego area.
The San Diego region again continued to experience improvement in overall air
quality in 1993, primarily from industry controls (reducing stationary emissions from
industrial and commercial sources), and engine technology (better motor vehicle
pollution controls). Despite these improvements, however, an acceptable level of
air quality for the San Diego region has not yet been achieved. As the effect of
industry controls and engine technology have virtually been exhausted, the APCD
indicates that the most significant future air quality improvements will result from
programs addressing mobile sources (such as automobiles) through strong public
transit and other efforts. As an illustration, the region's largest air quality problem
continues to be too many vehicle trips/miles driven. The number of miles driven per
year continues to grow at a rate almost double that of population growth, and motor
vehicles account for about 60% of the region's smog-forming emissions.
As a yardstick of improvement, the region exceeded the State clean air standard for
smog on only 90 days in 1993 compared to 97 days in 1992. With regard to
Federal standards, which are less stringent that State smog standards, the region
was in excess on 14 days in 1993 compared to 19 days in 1992. In terms of air
pollution components, State standards were met for carbon monoxide, nitrogen
dioxide, sulfur dioxide and lead, but not for ozone or inhalable particulates. All
similar Federal standards were met, except for ozone. Unique meteorological
conditions, such as EI Nino and the 1991 Mt. Pinatubo eruption, appear to have had
16 ~_~,
less impact on air quality in 1993 than in the previous two years. It was also noted
that Chula Vista continues to enjoy some of the best air quality of any area in the
region, with State standards being exceeded on only 12 days in 1993.
""""
Several significant matters were addressed in APCD's materials regarding last
year's Statement of Concern, arid the current activities of APCD as they may affect
the City in the future, as follows:
1) APCD is in process with both State and Federal EPA to achieve
downgrading of the San Diego Region's smog classification from "severe" to
"serious". If granted, the downgrade would have a direct impact on local air
quality programs, actually resulting in a lessening of some currently proposed
requirements such as employer trip reduction under the Transportation
Control Measures program.
The proposed downgrade is based upon refined APCD analyses of the
sources of regional air pollution which show that smog transported from Los
Angeles was the cause for exceeding State standards on 51 (57%) ofthe 90
days the region was non-complying in 1993. This influence from the Los
Angeles area is significant, and although they are implementing aggressive
air quality programs, the APCD indicates that meteorologically, the Los
Angeles area will always affect our region's air quality. Therefore, even
though local contributors to air pollution may lessen, the region's air quality
situation fcannot be A fully I addressed without considerations toward import """"
pollution rom Los nge es.
2) The APCD continues to develop and implement programs to achieve
provisions of the Regional Air Quality Strategy (AQS) adopted in June, 1992.
The AQS contains several major implementation measures developed in
conjunction with SANDAG including the Transportation Control Measures
Plan (TCM Plan), the Model Regional Transportation Demand Management
Program (TOM Plan), and an indirect source control program. The TCM and
TOM Plans were adopted in May, 1991, and among other measures, will
require businesses with 60 or more employees (such as the City of Chula
Vista) to boost the average vehicle ridership of their morning commuters
from a countywide average of 1.18 commuters per car to an average of 1.5
commuters per car by the year 2000, through use of a variety of incentives
and decentives.
A draft of an Indirect Source Reduction Program will be ready for review by
December 1994. That program will propose establishment of local
regulations and conditions regarding the siting and approval of land uses
which are traffic intensive.
3)
As part of the regional transportation planning efforts, the DMV has been
collecting a $2.00 registration fee on motor vehicles with the proceeds
"""\
17 ~-t27
.
4)
.
.
available to fund alternate transportation efforts. To date, the City has
received approximately $270,000 to fund several projects including electric
vehicles, alternate fuels development and a telecenter.
Industry controls continue to be implemented including those for utility boilers
which will affect the South Bay Power Plant, a solar water heater program
for new residential development and retrofitting, and a small business
assistance program to help with the financial side of installing air pollution
control equipment and other aspects of complying with regulations.
5)
The APCD continues to work with SANDAG to increase flexibility in the
expenditure of federal transportation development monies allocated under
the Intermodal Surface Transportation and Efficiency Act (ISTEA).
6)
Previous efforts through the DMV to regulate Mexican vehicles did not work.
AB 2008 (Alpert) is now law and requires all Mexican vehicles used for
commuting to work in California to meet state smog regulations. However,
it is not currently being enforced, as implementation mechanisms are still
being developed.
7)
Regarding the CECA review process on individual development project
proposals, the APCD has presently stopped commenting as a matter of
available staffing, and in light of the fact that their comments have been
largely ignored in the past.
8) The APCD would be happy to work with the City to revise the threshold
standard so it is workable. The AQS is based on SANDAG growth
projections, and the threshold standard should recognize this.
The GMOC also discussed the APCD's recommendation to change the threshold
standard to coordinate review of the City's annual growth forecast with SANDAG's
regional forecasts which are the basis for air quality planning. This is the second
consecutive year that the APCD has commented regarding their reliance (by law)
on regional growth forecasts produced by SANDAG for the purposes of air quality
planning and management. The present threshold standard requires APCD to
review the City's 12-18 month growth forecast and provide comments regarding that
forecast's impacts on current and future air quality management programs. Given
APCD's reliance on SANDAG, they are not functionally able to perform that task.
Therefore, the GMOC does not have before it information sufficient enough to form
conclusions regarding compliance with that aspect of the threshold standard, and
subsequently recommends:
. That the Air Quality threshold standard be revised to achieve better
coordination with the APCD and SANDAG, and In Implementing the
provisions of the Regional Air Quality Stretegy (AQS).
18 :<-~R"
Given the limited ability of the GMOC to focus on preparing such a revision during
the short time we are annually convened to review thresholds, we also recommend: ""'"
. That the City Council authorize the Planning Department to assemble
and facilitate a Task Force, consisting of one or more members of the
GMOC, APCD, SANDAG and other City Department(s) as deemed
appropriate, to develop a draft revised standard over the next four
months for GMOC consideration with our next annual review
commencing in October, 1994.
Toward assisting that Task Force, the draft revision should focus on establishing
standards to measure local response on individual projects and other programs to
ensure that the City is complying with regional requirements, and on imposing
appropriate air quality mitigation measures on projects. Examples of the focus for
such revisions include:
1. considering whether the City's development policies and
procedures relate to, and/or are consistent with Federal, State
and Local air quality regulations and programs;
2. reviewing whether the City is in compliance with relevant
Federal, State and Local regulations regarding air quality; and
3.
conducting a review to determine if local development projects
were conditioned by, and implemented, measures designed to
foster air quality improvement.
~
The GMOC would also like to emphasize the strong correlation between traffic flow
and localized air quality deterioration ("hot spots"), and the need to focus on
appropriate traffic control measures to reduce or eliminate this problem. Continued
focus on transportation planning designed to foster the free flow of traffic is a crucial
means to avoiding traffic congestion and localized air quality problems.
""'"
19
.:l-.:zf
e
e
e
a
ISSUES WHERE THRESHOLDS ARE MET
SCHOOLS -
THE GMOC FINDS. BASED ON THE CHULA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
AND SWEETWATER UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICTS' RESPONSES TO THE
CITY'S 12-18 MONTH GROWTH FORECAST. THAT THE SCHOOLS
THRESHOLD STANDARD IS BEING MET.
a.
Chula Vista Elementary School District
Based upon the City's 12 to 18 month growth forecast, the Chula Vista
Elementary School District has estimated that it will need to accommodate
25 new students west of 1-805, given the 82 residential units forecast for
completion there from July, 1993 through December, 1994. It should be
noted that the 82 units reflects the high-end, or worst-case forecast for
housing unit completions, and construction activity will likely be somewhat
less given the continuing recession. Currently, most of the schools west of
1-805 are at or over capacity, although some capacity does exist in certain
schools at various grade levels. As of January, 1994, a total of 302 children
from around the District were being bused to relieve overcrowding. Of those
children, 192 were from schools west of 1-805.
While additional growth will contribute to further exacerbation of this situation,
the District has indicated that it can accommodate the projected new
students within existing facilities. In addition to continued busing, the District
can accommodate additional students by revising classroom space use.
Such potential revisions include dismantling computer labs, relocating
resource teachers, and reconfiguring classes (combination classes, pairing
schools, etc.) Many schools have already taken such steps. It should be
noted that several opportunities continue to exist for the possible expansion
of existing schools in westem Chula Vista, particularly Vista Square and Rice
which have adequate land to permit expansion, or Feaster School where
additional adjacent vacant land could be acquired. Lack of funding, however,
continues to be an obstacle to progress.
East of 1-805, the District estimates it will need to accommodate
approximately 506 new students, given the 1688 new residential units
forecast for completion there from July, 1993 through December, 1994. The
majority of these units are in the Eastlake and Rancho Del Rey planned
communities. The District indicated that this estimated growth in school
enrollments can be accommodated by existing schools and schools which
are being planned and financed through the present five Mello-Roos
Community Facilities Districts (CFD). Eastlake School is currently using
20
0< - 3CJ
relocatable classrooms to accommodate new students until the new
elementary school in the Eastlake Greens project opens. That school is
tentatively scheduled to open in July, 1995, on a year-round single track
calendar. Discovery School, located in Rancho Del Rey, opened on a year-
round single-track schedule in July 1993. The District will continue to work
with developers to establish additional CFD's to address future impacts
involving the Salt Creek Ranch, Otay Ranch and Rancho San Miguel
projects.
The District has previously raised, and continues to raise, the issue of
additional indirect student generation from non-residential development. To
this end, the District, Sweetwater Union High School District and the City are
currently involved in a study of the impacts various types of development,
and demographic changes have on school facilities. The study is being
conducted by SourceRoint, the non-profit arm of the San Diego Association
of Govemments. The results of that study, anticipated for completion by
July, 1994, will be used as a basis for developing appropriate and equitable
mitigation strategies.
The report from the Chula Vista Elementary School District also provided
thorough responses to each of last year's Statements of Concern, and
described a number of activities the District is undertaking to keep abreast
of changing conditions as follows:
1)
The District continues to be interested in expanding Feaster School
through acquisition of the four acre parcel adjacent to the east which
is for sale. However, as with the other noted candidate schools (Rice
and Vista Square), financing is the impediment. For the Feaster site,
financing only appears available through the imposition of mitigation
on the proposed Bayfront project. The District is concerned as it has
not been advised of activity on the Bayfront project for over a year.
Whatever development eventually occurs there, it must be required
to fully mitigate all impacts to school facilities.
2) To date, 24 schools have prepared growth plans, and all plans are
reviewed annually. By next year all schools will have begun the
process of developing or updating such plans. Several schools' plans
contain a multi-track component to be analyzed when the school
reaches 120% of capacity. While the District continues to evaluate
multi-track as an enrollment management technique, there presently
is still substantial opposition from parents and staff to multi-track
scheduling. As previously mentioned, the District is implementing
other techniques designed to effectively accommodate existing and
short-term (1-2 years) projected enrollment.
21
.;; -,.g/
"'""
1
'"""'\
.
3)
4)
.
.
Additionally, new legislation to revamp the State's School
Construction Program is being sponsored by Assemblywoman Eastin.
Part of that legislation calls for elimination of the multi-track
scheduling incentive now used in calculating district eligibility for State
funds. If successful, the District's eligibility for construction funding
would increase.
The District's decision to purchase rather than lease its 95 relocatable
classrooms was made years ago, and has proven to be financially
sound. Effective January 1, 1994, relocatable classrooms that were
owned for at least 20 years no longer count in the State's eligibility
program for construction funding. Of the District's relocatable
classrooms, 67 are older than 20 years, and state funding eligibility
should thereby increase by 2,010 students.
Proposition 170, which would have reduced the required vote for
general obligation bonds to a simple majority, failed in November
1993. Similar legislation has been introduced this year.
5)
To date, the District has not been successful in obtaining full
mitigation of all project's school impacts in western Chula Vista, even
for those requiring legislative acts such as general plan amendments
and/or rezonings. The District hopes the City will assist in achieving
the goal of full mitigation on all projects, as endorsed by the City
Council through GMOC Statements of Concern issued to the District
for the past three years.
6) The joint School Enrollment Impact Mitigation Study with SourcePoint
is progressing, and should be completed by July, 1994. The resulting
data should be extremely useful to the districts and the City in
projecting school facility needs based on projected residential and
non-residential development, and demographic changes. Having
identified these impacts, potential methods for mitigation will
subsequently be analyzed and a proposal prepared for City
Council/school board consideration.
7) Full mitigation of school impacts (both residential and non-residential)
from the Bayfront Project is critical to the overcrowding situation in
western Chula Vista. The District appreciates the City's assistance
in assuring that full mitigation will be provided, and requests the
mitigation be structured to expand existing school sites in western
Chula Vista, preferably Feaster School, to accommodate children from
the Bayfront project.
8)
The District continues, with a variety of ongoing activities, to plan
proactively for growth and improvement of school facilities. Such
22
o?-.J.t..
activities include development tracking and phasing monitoring, .""",
conducting school growth planning studies, boundary/attendance area 1
adjustments, residency verification, requests for City assistance,
responses to notices of proposed development, participation in the
State Modernization Program, and utilization of CDBG funding for
playground improvements.
While the GMOC found the District in compliance with short-range threshold
standard requirements, we remained concerned over the continued provision
of adequate school facilities to meet the needs of future students, and
recommend that the City Council and the school district take the following
actions to address longer-term threshold compliance:
. As the overcrowding situation has not changed, assist the
School District In adopting and implementing expansion of
schools in western Chula Vista, particularly Vista Square, Rice,
and Feaster Schools.
.
Urge the School District to continue to actively explore means to
alleviate school overcrowding through innovative scheduling
methods and techniques. The School District acknowledges that
much of the overcrowding problem In western Chula Vista
schools would be relieved by implementing a multi-track year-
round schedule for schools, but such a solution has not been
pursued by the School Board at this time because studies
indicate it is not supported by the community.
"""
. Deny applications to rezone any property in western Chula Vista
which would increase allowable density or intensity of use
unless no aggravation of existing threshold standards related to
schools will result due to full, adequate and equitable mitigation.
The City should seek achievement of full mitigation in the long-
term for all infill development in the western portion of the City,
regardless of whether rezonings or other legislative acts are
involved.
. Continue to support timely completion of the cooperative study
underway between the City, the District, Sweetwater Union High
School District and SourcePoint to Identify the impacts of new
residential and non-residential development, and demography
upon City schools. Based upon the study's results, direct that
staff expedite development of proposed mitigation strategies for
consideration and adoption by the City Council and both school
boards.
........
23
c<-33
.
.
Through firm conditions of approval early In the process, require
full mitigation of school impacts from both residential and non-
residential development In the Bayfront project, and recommend
to the school district that this mitigation measure be
Implemented by expanding existing schools in the northwest
quadrant of Chula Vista. Reinforce this condition by requiring
that any Disposition and Development Agreement for the project
ensure full mitigation of all school Impacts.
. In addition to the Bayfront project, the GMOC recommends that
school enrollment Impacts resulting from all non-residential
development be fully mitigated to the mutual satisfaction of the
City and elementary school district. The previously mentioned
joint enrollment impact study being conducted by SourcePolnt
will provide a basis from which equitable approaches to
mitigating non-residential development impacts can be devised.
.
The District also drew specific attention to schools planned for the Baldwin
Company's Salt Creek Ranch project and adjacent Salt Creek I project. Presently,
there are no schools to serve either project, although the Salt Creek I project is
already under construction. Pursuant to adopted facilities plans, students from Salt
Creek I, along with those from Salt Creek Ranch are to attend schools to be located
in Salt Creek Ranch. In July, 1993, Community Facilities District (CFD) proceedings
were formally abandoned by the developer who has yet to resume planning
activities with the District. In the interim, Salt Creek I students are attending other
area schools which are already impacted. It takes some time to form a new CFD
and to generate adequate revenue to finance construction of a new school. If
mitigation is to be in the form of a CFD, it is essential that formation occur well in
advance (2-3 years) to assure facilities will be available when children begin to
arrive. Presently, several Final Subdivision Maps for the Salt Creek Ranch project
are before the City for review and approval, and the GMOC understands processing
has been inactive since approximately August, 1993. In order to avoid further
exacerbation of overcrowding at other area schools, it is imperative that the
developer resume discussions with the District. Therefore, the GMOC also
recommends:
. That the City encourege the Salt Creek Ranch developer to
resume negotiations with the District, and withhold further
processing of final maps for the Salt Creek Ranch project until
such time as the school district notifies the City that they have
reached understanding with that developer as to the method(s)
and timing for the provision of planned schools.
.
24
d(-a~
b.
Sweetwater Union Hiah School District
"""
The Sweetwater Union High School District reported an enrollment of 28,818
students throughout the district, a 70 student (0.2%) increase over 1992
enrollment. 14,452 of these students, or 50.5% of the total, attend the five
high schools and four junior high schools in Chula Vista. As a comparison,
enrollment in Chula Vista schools grew by 343 students over that in 1992,
while the overall District grew by only 70 students. This reflects the drop in
enrollment at several schools throughout the District.
Overall, however, the District is still operating above capacity, including
relocatable classroom space. Presently, four ofthe five high schools serving
Chula Vista are between 113% and 115% of capacity, while the junior
high/middle schools are between 74% and 100%. Eastlake High School (the
fifth high school) is not included in these figures as it is still in the final
phases of construction. Approximately 1100 students currently attend school
there in the phase I portion of construction which was completed in
September, 1992. Upon completion of phase II in Fall, 1994, the school's
capacity will be increased to 2400 students. This could help reduce present
overcrowding levels at the other area high schools.
Given the 12-18 month forecast provided by the Chula Vista Planning
Department, the District projects an increase of 514 students in Chula Vista
junior High and High Schools in the 1994-95 school year. This increase, '1
which is based on worst-case growth of 1770 dwelling units between July,
1993 and December, 1994, is generally consistent with previous years, which
have averaged approximately 500 new students per year. The majority of
this growth will come from the Eastlake and Rancho Del Rey communities.
Most of the junior high/middle school grade levels will not be significantly
impacted, however, all high schools, with the exception of Eastlake, will
continue to be overcrowded.
The report from the Sweetwater Union High School District also provided
responses to last year's Statement of Concern, and described other activities
the district is undertaking to address school planning and construction as
follows:
1) The District presently focuses on site based management techniques
to alleviate overcrowding, whereby each school principal is annually
provided with estimated enrollment projections which are used to
develop the master schedule and room utilization plans. Additionally,
attendance boundary adjustments have successfully been used to
reduce enrollment pressures at specific school sites. The institution
of multi-track scheduling at the secondary school level presents a
complexity of problems which make it difficult to implement.
"""
25
,;(-S5
.
2)
Proposition 170, which would have reduced the required vote for
general obligation bonds to a simple majority, failed in November
1993. Similar legislation has been introduced this year.
3) The District has consistently requested full mitigation of residential
project school impacts where legislative acts are involved, and the
City has complied where appropriate. Regarding impacts from non-
residential development, the District, the City and the Chula Vista
Elementary School District are conducting a study through
SourcePoint on the impacts of new development and demographic
changes upon school enrollment. The study should be complete by
July, 1994. The issue of proposed developments' impacts remains of
concern to the District, and the City's continuing support is
appreciated.
The previously noted joint study between the City and both school
districts being conducted by Source Point will provide a direct basis for
developing appropriate mitigation mechanisms.
4) Although a mitigation strategy has been developed for the Bayfront
project, it has yet to be solidified and implemented. This is still a
concern of the District.
.
5)
In the Fall of 1993, the San Diego City Council lifted the development
moratorium on Otay Mesa. The District can now proceed with final
school planning activities. The District has tentatively targeted
September, 1999 as the opening date for the high school to be
located near Dillon Trail and 1-905.
6) The Eastlake High School library joint-use agreement is in place, and
the community has access to the library during non-school hours.
The City hires students as she Ivers, and two positions have been
funded for this year.
7) In August, 1992 the District received unfunded approval from the
State for the Rancho Del Rey and Eastlake Middle Schools. The
District's 50% funding match from Eastern Territories Mello-Roos fees
increased the schools' statewide priority to receive funding.
Architectural firms have recently been solicited for proposals for the
design and engineering of the Rancho Del Rey Middle School, and
selection should occur in the very near future. The school is
projected for opening in 1997.
8)
The District continues to establish Mello-Roos Facility Financing
Districts for new development in the Eastern Territories, to participate
in the state lease-purchase program for new schools, to conduct
.
26
&>l-,g6
ongoing review and adjustment of attendance boundaries, and to
perform residency verification.
"""
9) The District is continuing its cooperation and preplanning review with
the City of all development proposals, General Plan amendments and
rezonings.
While the GMOC found the District in compliance with short-range threshold
standard requirements, we remained concerned over the continued provision
of adequate school facilities to meet the needs of future students, and
recommend that the City Council and the school district take the following
actions to address longer-term threshold compliance:
. Urge the School District to continue to actively explore means to
alleviate school overcrowding through innovative scheduling
methods and techniques.
.
Deny applications to rezone any property in Western Chula Vista
which would increase allowable density or intensity of use
unless no aggravation of existing threshold standards related to
schools will result due to full, adequate and equitable mitigation.
Achievement of full mitigation in the long-term for all infill
development in western Chula Vista should be sought,
regardless of whether rezonings or other legislative acts are
involved.
"""
. Continue to support timely completion of the cooperative study
underway between the City, the District, Chula Vista Elementary
School District and SourcePolnt to identify the Impacts of new
residential and non-residential development, and demography
upon City schools. Based upon the study's results, direct that
staff expedite development of proposed mitigation strategies for
consideration and adoption by the City Council and both school
boards.
. Through firm conditions of approval early in the process, require
full mitigation of school impacts from both residential and non-
residential development In the Bayfront project, and recommend,
based on the District's input, that this mitigation measure be
implemented by expanding existing schools in western Chula
Vista. Reinforce this condition by requlrlng that any Disposition
and Development Agreement for the project ensure full mitigation
of all school impacts.
.
In addition to the Bayfront project, the GMOC recommends that
school enrollment Impacts resulting from all non-residential
"""
27
d -..37
.
.
.
a
development be fully mitigated to the mutual satisfaction of the
City and high school district. The previously mentioned Joint
enrollment Impact study being conducted by SourcePoint will
provide a basis from which equitable approaches to mitigating
non-residential development impacts can be devised.
Similar to the elementary school district, the high school district is also
concemed with the present status of school implementation for the Salt
Creek I and Salt Creek Ranch developments. Consistent with the discussion
on page 24 of this report, the GMOC, therefore also recommends:
. That the City encourage the Salt Creek Ranch developer to
resume negotiations with the District, and withhold further
processing of final maps for the Salt Creek Ranch project until
such time as the school district notifies the City that they have
reached understanding with that developer as to the method(s)
and timing for the provision of planned schools.
LIBRARIES -
THE GMOC FINDS THAT THE CITY IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE LIBRARY
THRESHOLD STANDARD, BASED ON THE ANTICIPATED COMPLETION OF
THE SOUTH CHULA VISTA LIBRARY IN DECEMBER. 1994.
The threshold standard for libraries requires that 500 square feet of library space
(adequately equipped and staffed) be provided per each 1,000 population. Based
on an estimated City population of 147,293 as of June 1, 1993, a total of 73,647
square feet of library space is required. Currently 67,329 square feet is provided
through the Chula Vista Public Library at 365 "F" Street with 55,000 square feet, the
Eastlake Library at 1120 Eastlake Parkway with 10,000 square feet, and a
combined 2,329 square feet in two small branches, Castle Park/Otay and Woodlawn
Park. This results in a present shortage of 6,318 square feet of library space under
the threshold standard. Both the library threshold and the Library Master Plan of
1987 recommend that the City supplement the main library at 365 "F" Street by
providing new library facilities in the each of the major community areas defined in
the City General Plan including Montgomery/Otay, Sweetwater/Bonita and the
Eastem Territories.
In accordance with that master plan, the 10,000 square foot library in conjunction
with Eastlake High School opened in 1993, and the 37,000 square foot South Chula
Vista Library is scheduled to open in December, 1994. With the opening of the
South Chula Vista Library, the City will surpass the threshold requirement by over
28,000 square feet, based on a projected City population of approximately 148,730
at the end of 1994. This forthcoming compliance is consistent with the threshold
standard which requires that solutions to deficiencies be commenced within three
28
c:2 -..3 fJ
,1\'
l-~ '
lW
years of their identification. Furthermore, even when considering a projected City
population of 175,766 in the year 2000, the City will still exceed the threshold
requirement by approximately 14,700 square feet based on construction of the
South Chula Vista Library.
""""
Regarding the recently opened Eastlake Library, the GMOC expresses its
appreciation for the City's efforts in completing this unique joint-use arrangement
which has also afforded students a work experience opportunity. Continuing in that
spirit, the GMOC recommends:
. That the City and the Sweetwater Union High School District explore
options to write a grant for library funding to capitalize on the unique
East/ake High School library Joint-use arrangement.
During this year's review, the GMOC became aware of the significant changes
being brought about in the present and future delivery of library services through the
use of technology. As an example, such technology will eventually enable citizens
to access books and other media through a home computer without having to
actually make a trip to the library. According to staff, currently contemplated
technology has the potential to bring about profound effects. In view of the present
threshold provision of "...adequately equipped and staffed facility...", the GMOC
concluded that such technological developments may affect future interpretation of
threshold standard, and therefore also recommends:
.
That the City Council direct the Ubrary Board of Trustees and City staff
to review the Library threshold standard for possible changes, with a
report to be forwarded to the GMOC for consideration with next year's
review cycle commencing in October, 1994. The review is intended to
take into account significant technological changes in the area of
library services.
-..,
The City has also previously been allocated $200,000 in Capital Improvement
Program funds for architectural services for a 29,000 square foot library to be
located at the corner of East "H" Street and Paseo Ranchero in the
Sweetwater/Bonita Community Area. This project will be funded by Development
Impact Fees, and its timing will be dependant on the collection of fees to cover the
estimated $9.5 million needed to construct, fumish and equip the facility. Although
not the official name, this library is referred to as the Rancho Del Rey Library.
29
""'"'
0l-..:?9
.
.
.
a
SEWER.
THE GMOC FINDS THAT THE CITY IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE SEWER
THRESHOLD STANDARD ON BOTH A PROJECT AND CUMULATIVE BASIS.
There were no significant instances of the threshold standard for sanitary sewers
being exceeded as a result of new growth during the reporting period. City design
standards for sewers limit the flow in sewers up to 12" in diameter to 50% full, and
to 75% full for sewers larger than 12". The City has also allowed flow up to 75%
full in 8", 10", and 12" diameter sewers if it can be shown that ultimate development
has already occurred in the area served by that sewer.
The Engineering Departmenfs report outlined several significant activities either
recently completed, or underway, to address the provision of adequate sewer
facilities and maintenance of threshold compliance:
1)
The Telegraph Canyon Sewer Basin Improvement and Financing Plan,
prepared by Willdan Associates, was completed in 1992. In October, 1992,
the City Council approved the Plan and established a Sewer Development
Impact Fee for new construction in the Telegraph Canyon Sewer Basin to
proportionately share the cost of upgrading the system. An amended plan
incorporating out-of-basin pumped flows from the Eastlake and Salt Creek
Ranch developments, and additional projected flows from the Kaiser Hospital
and Medical Center was completed in June, 1993. Council accepted this
amended plan on March 15,1994, and adopted a fee of $560 per equivalent
dwelling unit (EDU) for out-of-basin pumped flows.
2) The Proctor Valley Sewer was constructed in 1992 to serve the Salt Creek
I, Salt Creek Ranch, Rancho San Miguel and Bonita Meadows developments
as well as other adjacent parcels. The sewer connects to the County's
Frisbee Trunk, for which a trunk sewer usage agreement is currently being
prepared with the County.
3) A sewer analysis has been performed for the Salt Creek Sewer. Basin. The
planned line will serve the Salt Creek Ranch, Eastlake, Hidden Valley
Estates (in the unincorporated area east of Mt. Miguel), and Otay Ranch
developments. Recommended improvements and a financing plan are
expected to be presented to the City Council for approval in mid-1994.
,
4)
The parallel sewer along Industrial Blvd. has been completed, and should
alleviate prior capacity problems in this area, and the expected impacts from
the Palomar Trolley Center development in the sewer line in Industrial Blvd.
between Palomar St. and Anita St. Ongoing monitoring is occurring, and it
is anticipated that a parallel sewer south of Main St. will eventually be
needed.
30
",2 --'10
M
.j'
v\ ~
5)
The City's flow monitoring program has identified several problem sites.
including the Palm Canyon area where a parallel sewer is scheduled for
construction in 1994. Additional portable monitoring equipment is proposed
for acquisition in FY 1995 to improve accuracy and to expand the metering
program.
"'""
6) The City's sewer TV inspection crew continues to monitor problem sites in
order to determine if the condition of the sewer lines has affected the flow.
Phase IV of the program provided for rehabilitation of 1506 lineal feet, and
replacement of 389 lineal feet of sewer mains in 1993. An additional 41,793
lineal feet were televised during 1993 for Phase V of the program which will
rehabilitate another 1851 lineal feet, and replace another 240 lineal feet in
1994.
7) All new developments must address the adequacy of sewers to serve their
needs. Remedial actions are required where necessary to accommodate
added flows.
Sites identified through the above methods may be considered for inclusion in the
Capital Improvement Program or the Sewer Rehabilitation Program. New
developments will be required to pay a proportionate share for the construction of
needed new sewers.
Toward assuring that adequate sewers are provided as the City continues to grow, 1
the GMOC again expresses its concern regarding the potential impacts of .
development in eastern Chula Vista on sewer facilities in older western Chula Vista.
The GMOC therefore recommends:
. That the City continue to closely monitor the timely funding and
phasing of necessary upgrades and replacements of the sewer system
to avoid negative impacts from development in eastern Chula Vista
upon western Chula Vista.
San Dieao Metropolitan Sewer AuthoritvlSan Dieao Area Wastewater Manaaement
District
At present, the City's total daily wastewater flow into the Metropolitan Sewage
System (Metro) is approximately 10.987 million gallons per day (mgd), well within
our current contract capacity of 19.2 mgd. This includes 8.749 mgd of metered
flows discharged directly to the Metro sewer line, and 2.229 mgd of metered and
non-metered flows discharged through the Spring Valley Sewer outfall. Annual
wastewater flows have changed at a rate much less than predicted due primarily to
the recent building slowdown and water conservation efforts. In comparison to last
year, it appears that total daily flows have actually decreased by 0.501 mgd. The
City has verified adequate capacity in the Metro system to serve growth for the
~
31
c-< -~ I
.
coming year, and based on current projections, the 8.222 mgd of remaining contract
capacity beyond current flows should serve the City until approximately 2010.
However, the San Diego Wastewater Management District (SDAWMD) took effect
on January 1, 1993. Under the SDAWMD, capacity rights may not be treated in the
same manner as they have under Metro. The SDAWMD effectively replaces Metro,
and includes representatives from most Metro agencies. It will manage construction
and operation of Metro and Clean Water Program sewage transportation and
treatment facilities. Member agencies may presently withdraw from the SDAWMD
until June 30, 1994, without obligation to pay a proportionate share of the District's
debts outstanding at the time of detatchment. The City has retained a team of
technical, financial and legal consultants to develop a policy regarding membership
in the SDAWMD, and discussions are ongoing in this regard. In order to assure
that adequate sewer capacity will be available to meet the needs of local growth,
regardless of the entity the City deals with, the GMOC recommends:
.
. That the City continue to retain the team of technical, financial
and legal consultants to develop a recommendation regarding
the City's ongoing membership In the San Diego Area
Wastewater Management District (SDAWMD). This
recommendation is based upon the uncertainty which exists
regarding the ability and costs of receiving adequate future
sewerage treatment capacity and services through the SDAWMD.
As also discussed in the water section of this report, the proposed 6 mgd Otay
Valley Water Reclamation Plant proposed as part of the Clean Water Program and
scheduled for start-up in 1998, has been indefinitely postponed by the City of San
Diego. At present, however, it appears that the SDAWMD may be willing to
consider construction of this facility. Other South Bay cities have also recently
expressed some interest. As the timing of construction will be a consideration in the
development of the southern and eastern portions of Chula Vista, the GMOC
continues to feel it is critical to recommend:
. That City staff be directed to continue evaluating the possibility
for Chula Vista, a combination of South Bay cities, and/or the
SDAWMD to finance, design and construct a local water
reclamation plant in the South Bay, such as the Otay Valley Plant
originally proposed through the Clean Water Program.
.
32 Ol--'lJL
"
'. ; "~l
1\:"
,/l
D
DRAINAGE -
"'""
THE GMOC FINDS THAT THE CITY IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE DRAINAGE
THRESHOLD STANDARD ON BOTH A PROJECT AND CUMULATIVE BASIS.
During the review period, no major problems concerning the threshold standard for
drainage can be directly attributed to new growth in the City. One reason for this
is that developers have constructed detention basins so that downstream flows are
not increased. Each new subdivision is required to construct all drainage facilities
to handle storms of a 10 to 100 year magnitude, depending on the facility and size
of the drainage basin. The Environmental Impact Report for each development
must address any possible drainage problems either on-site or off-site. The
developer is required to implement mitigation measures, if necessary. It is the
GMOC's understanding, however, that at present, the Engineering Department is
unable to present quantifiable data/evidence that new growth in eastern Chura Vista
is not negatively impacting older facilities in western Chula Vista. Based on the
GMOC's previously expressed concerns in this regard, and the need to definitively
resolve whether such conditions exists, the GMOC recommends:
. That the Engineering Department develop a monitoring system
which will:
(1)
identify what current drainage flows (volumes) exist from
areas east of 1-805 to western Chula Vista, and
"'""
(2) monitor flows from the same locations at periodic intervals
to identify if, over time, any increases In flow have been
experienced due to new development.
Such monitoring is necessary in order to facilitate the
Commission's future abl1lty to know if new growth in eastern
Chula Vista is negatively Impacting facilities in western C,hula
Vista, and to enable specific recommendations to be made to the
City Council in these regards.
In addition to the construction of drainage facilities, developers must now obtain a
National Pollution Discharge Elimination System Construction Activity permit for
each grading operation affecting an area of five acres or more. This permit program
requires a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan which is specifically developed for
each construction site in order to prevent pollutants from reaching drainageways.
These permits are issued by the State Water Resources Control Board, the
Regional Water Quality Control Board, and the City. Developers will be required to
dedicate land and construct facilities necessary to serve their proposed
developments. Facilities benefiting an extensive area with multiple owners may be
financed through assessment districts.
~
33
.2-~3
.
In general, the City experienced fewer drainage problems and flooding in 1993 than
in 1992. In addition to less rainfall, this is also attributable to the fact that the long
duration storms of January 1993 primarily impacted the larger, regional drainage
facilities, not the smaller localized drainage facilities. The Engineering Department
cited a number of activities undertaken by the City and private developers in 1992
and 1993 which have reduced the potential for flooding and hazards in both the
newer and older areas of the City.
1) Ordinance #2384 established an impact fee for new development in the
Telegraph Canyon Creek Drainage Basin to fund improvements to the
Telegraph Canyon Creek east and west of 1-805. Improvements east of 1-
805 have been completed. Interim improvements to the channel between
Hilltop Park and Fourth Ave. were completed at the end of 1993, and
consisted of guniting the most eroded sections of the creek. Permanent
improvement of this segment of the channel will be funded and completed
over the next 5 to 10 years as development in the Otay Ranch occurs.
Additional interim facilities may be required during this time.
2)
Four drainage projects were completed under the CIP at an approximate
cost of $1,230,000, to correct some outstanding deficiencies in the City's
older areas. These include: Sierra Way between Broadway and Colorado
Av.; Oxford St. between Second Av. and Del Mar Av.; Guatay Channel north
of Naples St. near Hilltop Dr.; and Crested Butte St. between Broadway and
Welton St.
.
3) A major upgrade in the lower section of the Central Drainage Basin west of
Broadway and south of "G" St. is currently under construction at an
approximate cost of $1,500,000. An additional 66 inch pipe was included
from "L" St. to Naples St. as part of the Broadway reconstruction project.
That facility will help in the alleviation of flooding in the vicinity of Woodlawn
Av. and Moss St.
4) Repair has been approved, and funding partially obtained, for the erosion,
siltation and other damage caused to the City's major rivers and creeks as
a result of the January 1993 storms. Most notable among these is loss of
the Otay Valley Rd. bridge crossing the Otay River.
.
Despite these many efforts, the GMOC remains concerned over needed, but
unfunded drainage improvements throughout western Chula Vista. In May 1992,
the City Council accepted an Engineering Department report which includes
proposals for construction of drainage facilities to correct deficiencies, and
establishes a priority list of needed drainage improvement projects. That list
contained a total of 84 needed but currently unfunded improvements with an
approximated cost of $23,025,000. Considering an inflation rate of 4% per year,
funding of $1,695,000 per year for 20 years would be necessary to complete the
projects. In conjunction with this year's threshold report, the Engineering
34
o?-~7'
0,7
\/.
iL 10
Department presented a select list of the top 15 priority projects, totaling
$6,920,100, and reflecting necessary new budget appropriations through FY 1999- """"
2000 to accomplish them. Therefore, the GMOC recommends:
. That the City Council accept and endorse the top 15 priority
projects list of needed drainage Improvements In western Chula
Vista, and work toward appropriating funding for them as soon
as possible.
In order to ensure that the remaining 60 or so needed but unfunded drainage
projects from the May 1992 report also get constructed in a timely manner, the
GMOC further recommends:
. That the Engineering Department be directed to prepare a
subsequent priority list, along with Identification of potential
funding sources, from among the approximately 60 remaining
identified projects, to be used for future Capital Improvement
Program (CIP) considerations.
CI FISCAL .
THE GMOC FINDS THAT THE CITY IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE FISCAL
THRESHOLD STANDARD ON BOTH A CUMULATIVE AND PROJECT BASIS.
NEW GROWTH HAS GENERALLY PRODUCED SUFFICIENT REVENUES TO
FUND CURRENT, RELATED FACILITIES AND SERVICES.
""""
The Fiscal threshold standard addresses the impacts of growth on the City's fiscal
well being, particularly the collection and expenditure of impact fees from new
development. The Fiscal threshold calls for the preparation of a report to the
GMOC which evaluates the fiscal impacts of growth on operations and capital
improvements over both the previous 12 months, and the coming 12-18 month
period, including an analysis of development impact fee collection and expenditure
over the previous 12-month period.
A report prepared by the City's Interim Finance Administrator indicated that the
City's Development Impact Fee (DIF) Programs for Public Facilities, Transportation
and Drainage are in sound financial shape, and the programs are generally working
as planned. According to the report, the DIF's, along with the various special
assessment and financing districts required of major new developments, appear to
be generating sufficient revenue to fund current projects and services. This is true
despite the lingering recession, since under the DIF's, the need for most facilities
is triggered when development reaches a certain number of units or level of traffic
generation. If development slows, then the need for a facility is delayed, and
conversely if development accelerates. In addition, some developers elect to fund
and construct facilities in advance, and are given a credit against DIF payments.
"'""\
35
~ -7'5
.
Most of the major master planned projects have prepared Fiscal Impact Analyses
to address creation of a positive revenue picture, and which must be periodically
updated to reflect actual conditions and occurrences. In addition, under the Growth
Management Program, all major projects are required to prepare Public Facilities
Phasing and Financing Plans (PFFP) to ensure the timely provision of needed
facilities and services consistent with the threshold standards.
In summary, the following FY 1992-93 major DIF activities were outlined in the
report:
1) Completion of Phase III of the Telegraph Canyon Rd. / Otay Lakes Rd.
widening and improvement project under the Transportation DIF.
In addition, the City recently approved an update to the Transportation DIF
based on the January 1994 Trans DIF update study, and enacted an
additional fee related to funding the pre-interim SR125 roadway facility to
become effective January 1, 1995.
.
2) Under the Administration and Civic Center Expansion portions of the Public
Facilities DIF, relocation of some City offices to the EI Dorado Building was
completed ($44,000), and efforts are currently underway to purchase
property on "F" St. for the Civic Center Parking Expansion Project.
A $1.4 million dollar "loan" from the General Fund for the police building
expansion will be repaid from the Police Facility portion of the Public
Facilities DIF in FY 1993-94.
3)
4) A $110,000 debt service payment was made on the Library Automation
Project. DIF funds will also be used, in FY's 1993-94 and 1994-95 toward
construction of the South Chula Vista Library.
5) The City's fire training facility in Rancho Del Rey was completed ($146,000),
as well as Interim Fire Station #6 in Eastlake. That station was constructed
by Eastlake Development who will receive future DIF credits.
.
6) Installation of the City's Geographic Information System (GIS) continued
($78,000), and debt service payment was made on the Mainframe Computer
Expansion project ($42,000). Installation of a voice mail processing system
for the City was also completed ($93,000).
7) On April 20, 1993, the City completed its 1993 update ofthe Public Facilities
DIF, keeping the fee for residential land uses at $2,150 per dwelling unit, and
reducing the commercial/industrial fee to $10,750 per acre.
An annual DIF funds financial report is prepared to review the funding status of
each DIF and its projects, and to update the associated costs for these and any
36
r::< -~(,
new facilities necessary to support future development. The reports analyze the
apportionment of costs to projected development in order to adjust the DIF's to be
applied to new development. The GMOC is impressed by the ongoing
sophistication of the overall Development Impact Fee (DIF) program, and its
periodic updates, to ensure funds are available commensurate with facility and
service needs. However, in order to further enhance the process to address
continued facility planning success in what has become an increasingly complex
financial environment, the GMOC recommends:
"""
. That the annual review/update efforts performed for each of the DIF's
be expanded to also include a 5-year projection of needs/revenues,
based on the Planning Department's 5-7 year growth forecast, to ensure
sufficient lead times exist to address any identified issues before they
become a problem. The addition of such an advance planning
requirement Is also envisioned as aiding the management of the DIF
funds, particularly where interim loans between the DIF's are being
made or considered.
Regarding overall fiscal health, the State's continued budget balancing activities
again impacted the City. $1.5 million dollars of the City' $51 millon dollar FY 1992-
93 budget was lost due to State cuts. The State's transfer of property tax increment
to school districts impacted the City's Redevelopment Agency by an additional
$652,655. Beyond State reductions, the City also experienced reduced General
Fund revenues from the prolonged recession. Sales tax revenue actually dropped """""
by 1% ($205,610) from FY 1991-92 levels, when in non-recessionary times it .
generally increases between 4% and 8% annually. License and permit revenues
were only about 40% of normal, totalling $1,700,696 in FY 1992-93. Fees for
services including zoning, plan checking, subdivisions and inspections were down
$32,000 over last year.
In spite of the above, the City was able to end FY 1992-93 with a General Fund
balance of $8,337,802, which would be considered healthy under normal
circumstances. Given the continuing recession, however, and the likelihood of
further budget deficit issues at the State level, there will be continuing pressure on
the City administration and staff to develop creative techniques to avoid large-scale
budget cuts and the related deterioration of service which has been experienced in
many cities throughout the State over the last 2-3 years. Part of Chula Vista's good
fortune has resulted from the use of "one-time" revenues as budget offsets. Those
one time offsets totaled $2,699,000 for FY 1992-93. These one time revenues,
however, will not always be available to combat continuing fiscal issues. The
GMOC is concerned that continued dependance on one-time revenues to balance
the City's budget, could lead to relatively harsh cuts in staffing and/or services when
those revenues are no longer available. In such a scenario, the GMOC envisions
the potential for implications to threshold standard maintenance as staffing and or
services must be cut, and therefore recommends:
37
,
~-.J/7
.
.
.
.
That the Finance Department be directed to prepare a report which
evaluates the current practice of using one-time revenues to balance
the City's budget, and identifies the potential short-range impacts to
services such as police, fire and parks, If such revenues are not
available and the current economic climate and State cuts were to
continue for another 2 to 3 years. Such a report is necessary for the
GMOC to determine Iffuture threshold consequences could result from
fiscal conditions, and should be available for consideration during the
next review cycle commencing In October, 1994.
a TRAFFIC -
THE GMOC FINDS THAT THE CITY IS IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE TRAFFIC
THRESHOLD STANDARD ON BOTH A CUMULATIVE AND PROJECT BASIS.
HOWEVER. THE GMOC HAS IDENTIFIED FIVE LOCATIONS WHERE
POTENTIALLY SERIOUS THRESHOLD COMPLIANCE PROBLEMS COULD
OCCUR WITHIN THE NEXT FIVE TO TEN YEARS.
As amended in 1991, the threshold for traffic requires that Level-of-Service (LOS)
"C" or better as measured by observed average travel speed on all signalized
arterial segments, except that during peak hours a LOS of "0" can occur for no
more than any two hours of the day. Those signalized intersections west of 1-805
which do not meet the above standard, may continue to operate at their current
1991 LOS, but shall not worsen.
This threshold represents a change from the original Intersection Capacity Utilization
(ICU) method which analyzed the performance of intersections only, to the Highway
Capacity Manual (HCM) method which analyzes conditions over whole roadway
segments, and is a more comprehensive measurement as it considers the overall
"driving experience" in terms of time delay.
1993 Traffic Monitorina Proaram
The 1993 Traffic Monitoring Program (TMP) presented to the GMOC summarizes
the results of analysis performed through actual travel time and speed surveys of
all the arterial streets in Chula Vista during the AM peak hour period (7 am to 9
am), as conducted from March 1993 to mid-July 1993. Because the necessary
HCM field study work is labor intensive, travel studies for the three peak periods
(AM, Mid-Day, and PM) are to be spread out over time. The PM period was
evaluated in the 1992 TMP, the AM period this year (1993 TMP), the Mid-Day will
be presented next year, and then back to the PM period the following year, resulting
in a complete cycle of analysis every four years. Additionally, any segments found
to be operating at LOS "C" in any year would be analyzed along with the following
year's period to determine if potential problems exist, so that any necessary
operational changes can be addressed.
38
~-~g
,'1
.") ,
#,)
-,
The 1993 TMP results show that all arterial segments studied during the AM peak
period were found to operate at LOS "C" or better. Five (5) arterial segments were,","",
found to be operating at LOS "C", in at least one direction, and will be reevaluated
with the 1994 TMP which will assess the Mid-Day peak period for all arterial streets.
With regard to the nine (9) arterial segments found to be operating at Los "C" during
the PM peak period by the 1992 TMP, and which were re-studied by the 1993 TMP,
two (2) could not be assessed (one on Broadway and one on H Street) due to road
construction projects, five (5) continued to operate at LOS "C", and the other two
(2) experienced a deterioration from LOS "C" to LOS "0" in one direction of travel.
Those 2 segments were northbound Otay Lakes Rd. between Telegraph Canyon
Rd. and East 'H' Street, and eastbound Palomar St. between 1-5 and Broadway.
It should also be noted that the 1993 TMP again shows that arterial interchange
segments at the 1-5 interchanges, in general, are experiencing reduced levels-of-
service. This is due primarily to the close spacing of the signals, signal timing at
the ramps which is controlled by CAL TRANS, and the high volume of vehicles
entering and exiting the freeway. This is especially true of the short segment of
westbound "H" Street between Woodlawn Ave. and Bay Blvd. A related concern
remains with the trolley crossing gates at "E", "H" and Palomar Streets Vt,Ihich
interrupt flows every 5 to 7.5 minutes, and the need to continue to urge the
Metropolitan Transit Development Board (MTDB) to eventually construct grade
separations.
During last year's review of the 1992 TMP, the GMOC noted its continuing concern, """"
as expressed in both its 1990 and 1991 Annual Reports, regarding potentially
serious future "H" Street traffic problems both east and west of 1-805. As the
principal arterial for many of the large approved but not yet built master planned
communities and other projects, "H" Street's current configuration and capacity must
adequately meet these future traffic demands over the next 20+ years as buildout
occurs. Recent traffic models developed in conjunction with land use approvals
such as Kaiser Hospital and the Rancho Del Rey Commercial Center, indicate that
"H" Street will need to operate at or very near its maximum capacity to meet the
traffic threshold standard, providing little, if any, reserve capacity to address actual
future conditions not foreseen by the traffic models. The lack of reserve capacity
also limits the City's future flexibility to consider other project proposals like Kaiser
or Rancho Del Rey which may prove beneficial over the next 20 or more years.
In its 1992 Annual Report, the GMOC amplified these concerns, and requested that
a comprehensive re-evaluation of traffic conditions in the "H" Street service area be
conducted, with a report back to the GMOC regarding any potential threshold issues
along with remedial strategies. Such a report has not been produced, and as stated
in the finding for this year's review (1993 TMP), the GMOC has identified 5 locations
where potentially serious threshold compliance problems could occur within the next
5-10 year. Those areas are:
1. "H" St. east of 1-805.
""'"
39
dl-L/9
.
2.
3.
4.
5.
"H" St. west of 1-805 to 1-5.
Otay Lakes Rd. between East "H" St. and Telegraph Canyon Rd.
Palomar St. between Broadway and 1-5, and
SR-125.
In the spirit of prudence, and to allow for sufficient pre-planning to avoid what the
GMOC continues to see as an inevitable future moratorium condition affecting one
or more of these locations, the GMOC recommends:
. That the City Council refer the noted 5 locations to the Engineering
Department for study in terms of projected traffic volumes, system
(street) capacity, and the funding, phasing and construction of needed
Improvements to meet the demands of projected growth. The results
should be embodied In a report to be provided to the GMOC next year
(October, 1994), and including potential solutions to demonstrate
continued compliance with traffic threshold standards over the long
term.
The GMOC requests that the following issues/recommendations be addressed in
that report with regard to each of the 5 noted locations:
"H" Street East of 1-805-
.
As the principal arterial for many of the large, approved but not yet built
projects in eastern Chula Vista, East "H" Street's current configuration and
capacity must meet related traffic demands over the next 20+ years as
buildout occurs. As additional signals are added between 1-805 and Otay
Lakes Rd., and projects continue to build, the GMOC is extremely concerned
that the street will become overtaxed, and result in the need for a
development moratorium. In order for the GMOC to clearly understand the
potential for a moratorium, and to thereby accordingly advise the Council, the
City Traffic Engineer's report should comprehensively analyze all existing
and currently approved future land uses within the East "H" Street service
area to determine if any land use or other modifications are needed to
correct potential problems before they necessitate a moratorium.
"H" Street West of 1-805 to 1-5-
.
Given the known physical and economic constraints to major future
modifications of "H" Street west of I-80S, the impacts of currently proposed,
and/or anticipated, major development or redevelopment projects should be
scrutinized and tailored to the limitations of the street. Recognizing the
street's limitations, and already contemplated projects such as Scripps and
the Chula Vista Center expansion, any further development has the potential
to overtax the street. Existing and projected traffic volumes on "H" Street
should be evaluated to determine what level of development can be
40
~-~
supported by employing remedial measures such as signal timing, no left ........
turns, etc. If a threshold problem will eventually exist, then the report should 1
also identify at what point land use limitations or other similar measures
would be necessary to maintain threshold compliance.
Otav Lakes Rd. Between East "H" St. and TelearaDh Canvon Rd.-
Although presently operating within the Standard, this section of Otay Lakes
Rd. is a concern as it has deteriorated from LOS 'C' to 'D' since last year.
That segment should therefore remain a focus in all subsequent TMPs in the
form of an annual status report. That status report should address the
effectiveness of the interim signal timing adjustments proposed in the 1993
TMP (or other remedial measures), as well as the schedule for related
funding under the TransDIF for construction of the needed six-lane facility.
Palomar St. Between Broadwav and 1-5-
Although presently operating within the Standard, this section of Palomar
Street is a concern as it has deteriorated fromLOS 'C' to 'D' since last year.
That section should therefore remain a focus in all subsequent TMPs in the
form of an annual status report. That status report should also address the
effectiveness of the proposed improvements as identified in the 1993 TMP.
SR125
1
The importance of SR125 to supporting buildout ofthe projects in the City's
General Planning Area consistent with the Traffic Threshold has been
previously established by both the City's Growth Management plans and the
Eastern Chula Vista Transportation Phasing Plan. In light of the uncertainty
of CAL TRANS and CTV to construct SR125 in a timely manner, the GMOC
supports the SR125 interim facility planning efforts contained in the HNTB
report, but recommends that further and more detailed study of the San
Miguel and Sweetwater road segments of that plan occur. This effort is
necessary to ensure adequate community input and publicity, and avoid
potential adverse reaction which could delay implementation due to various
neighborhood impacts and school safety issues.
In closing, the GMOC notes that monitoring improvements have resulted from the
TMP and its associated methods of measurement under the HCM threshold
standard. The effort produces very thorough results which enable potential issues
to be identified in advance, thereby allowing sufficient time to resolve them before
they become problematic.
""'"
41
o? -,f"";
.
.
.
a
PARKS AND RECREATION -
THE GMOC FINDS. BASED ON THE PRESENT STANDARD. THAT THE CITY IS
IN COMPLIANCE WITH THE PARKS AND RECREATION THRESHOLD ON BOTH
A CUMULATIVE AND PROJECT BASIS.
The Parks and Recreation threshold is a population-based standard calling for 3.0
acres of neighborhood and community park land to be provided for every 1 ,000
residents east of I-80S. This standard has been met as of June 30, 1993, as
illustrated by the following table:
Acres of Acres! Acre Shortfall
Area PODulation Parks 1.000 or Excess
East of 1-805 41,243 190.50 4.62 +66.77
West of I-80S 106,052 129.45 1.22 -188.71
City-Wide 147,295 319.95 2.17 -121.94
Standardlldeal 147,295 441.89 3.00 -121.94
While demonstrating compliance (based on the present standard apply east of I-80S
only), this table also reveals the continuing shortfall in park land 'both for western
Chula Vista and for the City as a whole. For each of the last five years, the GMOC .
has recommended that the Parks Threshold Standard be amended to apply city-
wide, and to be measured both east and west of I-80S. In 1992, Council endorsed
making such revisions, but requested that a potential credit system (equivalency
factor) for active recreation facilities such as pools and gyms be developed which
would provide for threshold calculating credit for more land area than the facilitieS
actually occupy. The equivalency factors, in particular, were seen as necessary
before the final language of a revised threshold standard could be prepared for
adoption.
Development of such a credit system has been incorporated as part of the proposed
Parks Implementation Plan (PIP), for which a work program was recently authorized
by the City Council. The proposed PIP would address possible park equivalency
factors, land availability, and other matters in western Chula Vista, and serve as a
foundation for developing a 20-year master plan to correct existing deficiencies
toward meeting the goal of 3 acres/1000 population west of I-80S. As the threshold
standard therefore presently remains unchanged, the GMOC recommends for the
fifth consecutive year:
42
:? ,5::L
.
That the City Council amend the Parks and Recreation Threshold
Standard to apply City-wide, both east and west of 1-805.
""'"
The GMOC is becoming increasingly concerned that this matter still remains
unresolved since 1992, and that the PIP is projected to take another 18 months to
complete. Completion of the PIP is critical to a variety of parks issues, particularly
Council's inquiries regarding a credit system for major facilities such as swimming
pools, and other matters which must be resolved before the final language of a
rev.ised City-wide standard can be completed for adoption. In this regard, the
GMOC also recommends:
. That the City Council direct staff to expedite completion of the Parks
Implementation Plan (PIP), and ensure that the PIP is a priority In the
work programs of the Planning and Parks and Recreation Departments
for the next year; and,
. That those sub-components of the PIP which will form a basis for a
revised standard be directed for placement up-front in the
aforementioned work program to avoid continued delay in the adoption
of a revised standard.
In addition, although not directly tied to the PIP, is the need to complete preparation
of the Greenbelt Master Plan called for by the City's 1989 General Plan Update, and
to develop the related, comprehensive Bike and Hiking Trails Plan. It is the ~
GMOC's position that the longer the Greenbelt Master Plan goes uncompleted, the
greater the potential for erosion and/or non-realization of one of the most significant,
and well publicized components of the updated General Plan. Therefore, the
GMOC recommends:
. That a Greenbelt Master Plan be undertaken and closely coordinated
with the PIP to ensure optimum use of the Greenbelt for park and
recreation purposes.
This is especially important for those Greenbelt areas west of 1-805 due to the
deficiency of parkland in that part of the City. Additionally, and as previously
mentioned, the lack of a Greenbelt Master Plan leads to uncoordinated planning
which could result in erosion of attaining the circumferential Greenbelt concept as
prescribed by the 1989 General Plan. This potential for erosion, or non-realization,
is particularly great in areas that are not receiving comprehensive attention through
major planning project efforts, such as the SR54 corridor between 1-805 and 1-5.
The GMOC is aware of several individual project proposals being considered in that
corridor which have the potential to directly impact realization of the Greenbelt. In
this regard, the GMOC also recommends:
""'"
43
:<-.53
.
.
That the City Council direct staff to fully consider Greenbelt Issues In
the course of reviewing current project proposals within and adjacent
to the SR54 corridor between 1-805 and 1-5.
One of the ongoing hurdles noted in realizing the Greenbelt, or other new park sites
in western Chula Vista, has been funding the costs of land acquisition and facility
construction, operation and maintenance. The GMOC would like to suggest use of
the "exceptional and extraordinary benefit" provisions of Section 6.2 of the General
Plan Land Use Element. Those provisions allow new developments to reach higher
density yields where such benefits to the larger Chula Vista community can be
demonstrated. Perhaps assistance to the City, monetary or otherwise, in resolving
parks and recreation issues in western Chula Vista could be considered as
demonstrating such a benefit.
During the review period, the Parks and Recreation Department completed many
positive efforts which were highlighted in their report, and should also be noted:
.
Approved a joint-use agreement with the Sweetwater Union High School
District for facilities at Chula Vista Community Park and neighboring Eastlake
High School.
Approved the master plan for the McCandliss Memorial at Halecrest Park.
Approved a State grant application for stage improvements at Memorial Park.
Approval of funding for restroom renovation at Los Ninos Park.
Accepted a Small Business Tree Planting Program Grant from the Califomia
Department of Forestry.
Completed Phase I of the Play Equipment CIP.
Completed Chula Vista Community Park at Eastlake Greens, adding 12.9
acres to the City's park system.
Established the Youth Action Program at select high and middle schools.
Formed the Youth Coalition in cooperation with major youth-providers in the
City.
Conducted the Youth Summit to collect information on needs for middle and
high school aged youth.
Initiated Phase II construction at Rohr Park.
Initiated the Otay Park Master Plan and joint-use program.
Developed a joint-use agreement with the 4-H Club of San Diego to provide
latchkey services in the Montgomery area.
Completed appraisal of the property at Third and "L" St. for possible park
acquisition.
The Parks Department report also provided responses to each of last year's GMOC
concerns. Based on the present status of activities in addressing many of those
concerns, the GMOC makes the following additional recommendations, many of
which echo previous concerns:
.
44
~-6~
.
The City should create an impact fee program which wilt require new
apartment construction in Western Chula Vista to pay park fees. Park
Acquisition & Development (PAD) fees are currently collected ,only for
subdivisions, including condominium projects. It should be noted that
completion of the PIP is also necessary in order to establish specific
proposed improvements and areas of benefit, upon whIch equitable
impact fees can be collected from new apartment development as well.
"'"
. New multi-family projects in western Chula Vista should be required to
provide a set amount of private recreation facilities within the
development. General provisions regarding such facilities are included
in the proposed City Design Review Manual being drafted by the
Planning Department. However, those provisions amount to only broad
guidelines, and more in-depth study is necessary to develop a workable
program. Preparation of the PIP provides an opportunity to address
such a study, and the PIP should determine a minimum reasonable
project sIze to which such a requirement should apply.
. The Parks and Recreation Department should continue to assess the
appropriateness of Hmini-parksH in western Chula Vista. While such
parks are more expensive in per-acre costs to develop and maintain,
they provide a more intimate scale for local neighborhoods, and may 1
be the only method by which local park deficiencies in western Chula
Vista can be remedied without significant condemnation of existing
'development. Again, this re-assessment is part of the PIP's work
program.
In closing, the GMOC would like to acknowledge the City for cooperative
recreational program funding such as that for the Youth Action Program, and also
acknowledge the schools, YMCA, and Boys and Girls club for their efforts in forming
a coalition to address human service needs. Presently, the Parks and Recreation
Department, YMCA, and Boys and Girls Club are administering a variety of youth
programs with the noted funding. The GMOC believes continuation of this spirit of
cooperation and efficiency in resources is necessary to tackle many of the parks
and recreation issues facing the City as growth occurs.
(GMOC-93\FINL-ANU.RPT)
"'"
45
~-55
'. DAlE . Febl1llU'Y 17, 1994
.
ro . Growth ManIlgement Oversight Committee
.
FROM . RicJuud P. Emerson, Ode.! of PoUce ~J.V
.
SUBJECT . Police DqJartmenllWponse StIltisticsfor Flsco1 Year 1992-93
.
IDtroductiOD
The Police Departmell,t is responsible fOr .eporting two Quality-of-Life 1bIeshold Standards to
the OMOC. Each of these 1bIeshold Standards includes two SlJlriaio:s: JIIupOttion of calls for
Iel'Vice (CFS) responded to within seven 7 nUnutes, and, average response time. The first
threshold measure is for Priority One (PI). PI CFS include felony crimes in pro&reSS and
known injury to persons or paupe.ty. The threshold S1andard for PI CFS is: 8S" of all PI CFS
responded to within 7 nUnutes (7:00), and, an average response time for all PI CFS of four
nUnutes and thirty seconds (4:30). The second threshold measure is for Priority Two (P2) CFS.
P2 CFS include misdemeanor crimes in progress, possibility of injury to persons or p,u9Cfty,
and emergency public services (i.e., traffic signal out). The threshold standard for P2 CFS is:
62" of all Priority n CFS responded to within seven nUnutes, and, an average response time
for all P2 CFS of 7 nUnutes.
.
GMOC 1bresbold Data
During FY 1992-93, the current review period, the Police Department responded to 77,811 calls
for service (CFS). This represents an increase of 6,988 CFS over FY 1991-92 and translates
into a growth rate in CFS volume of 9.9" for the fiscal year ended lune 30, 1993. Despite this
significant increase in workload, the Police Department met or m:eedecI three of the four
Quality-of-Ufe Threshold Standards established by the OMOC for police services.
Priority 1 CaDs for Service. During the current review period, the Police Department met one
of the two threshold standards established for PI CFS. In FY 1992-93, 84.2" of PI CFS were
responded to within 7:00. However, the average response time for all PI CFS was 4:44, or
about S.2" above the threshold standard.
Improvemepf Over Lut ReprtIDa Period. Both of these -'"UteS showed substantial
improvement over the previous i~Itina period. In FY 1991-92, the Police Department
.o:;yurted that 81.2" of PI CFS were responded to within 7:00 and that the averaae PI response
time was 4:S3. Such improvements, despite a substantial workload increase, reflect the
dedication and bard work of Police Department staff on many levels.
PriorIty 2 CaDs lor Semce. During the current review period, the Police Department met both
of the threshold standards established for P2 CFS: 64.2" of all Priority n CFS were responded
to within 7 nUnutes and the average response time of for all P2 CFS period was 6:33
.
CIlVLA l'DTA POUCIl DlII'MtlJIIINT
A-I
On-GolDg Efforts to Reduce Police Response TImes
The Police Department bas made proactive policing apriority. Our approach bas been that it '"'""
is more effective to prevent crime before it occurs than to respond to calls for service. To this
end, the Police Department bas implemented the following programs over the last twelve
months:
. The Street Team will prevent street level crime like robberies and drug d....ling
o The FY 1993-94 Police Department budget was increased by 5.0 sworn positions,
including 1.0 Police Sergeant, to staff the Street Team
o Total costs for FY 1993-94 are appro:d11Ullt..ly $160,000.
. The School Resource 0fIicer (SRO) Program is a cooperative venture of the ChuIa Vista
Police Department Sweetwater Unified High School District (SUHSD) that assigns sworn
officers to local high schools on a full-time basis
o An additional 2.0 Peace Officer positions were included in the FY 1993-94 Police
Department budget to staff the SRO Program
o The City and SUHSD each pay approximately $70,000 for costs associated with
1.0 Peace Officer
.
The Gang Unit is providing an enhanced police presence within the gang community by
patrolling places gang members are known to congregate
"""
o Two officers were transferred from regular patrol assignments so there are
minimal costs associated with this program for the current fiscal year
o These two officers assist the two existing gang enforcement Officers working out
of the Investigative Division's 1uvenile Unit and the Officer assigned to the
1urisdictions Unified Drug/Gang Enforcement (I.U.D.G.E.) Program
. The Reaional Auto 'lbeft Tuk Force (RATI) and its spinoff the ~I Action
Carlo Theft Team (TACT) are regional programs underwritten by a combination of
Vehicle license Fees, federal and private sector funding
o The RA IT Team specializes in reducing the tbefi of automobiles
o The TACf Team specializes in reducing the theft of truclring industry ClUJo
o The City is currently reimbursed for the personnel expenses related to all three
positions assigned these regional enforcement teams: 1.0 Police Sergeant and 2.0
Police Agents
CIIUIA VISTA I'OUCB Dl!PMrlJIENT
~
PvZ
.. Sworn StaffiD& Overblre Prvpdl
. &abIes Police Department to come closer to fully S1affing existing positions during the
course of the year
. Gets Police Department ahead of the curve in filling positions given the amount of
turnover that occurs in a department with 244.5 persons
. No budgetary impact
VoJu..w- Based Prvsa_mml"l
. The Cltl-nc Advenity Support Team (CAST) provides emotiooal and practical support
to victims of traumatic incidents like deaths, violent crime and files
o There are minimal staff support costs associated with CAST
.
o Since mid-August, CAST has responded on over 100 police and fire calls and
.,,;QtM nearly 200 Chula Vista citizens and visitors
The PoUce Aetivities Leape (pAL) provides youth with a variety ofbealthy alternatives
to ctiminal behavior and/or gang membership
.
o There are minimal staff support costs associated with PAL
o To date, 250 ldds have participated in PAL sponsored programs
Based upon theses new programs, staff expects that response time data will continue to improve
and that the Police Department will comply with all GMOC Quality-of-Life Tbreshold Standards
during the next reporting period, July 1993 through June 1994.
cc: John D. Goss
Sid W. Morris
Ed Batchelder
PDStaff
Captains (3)
Lieutenants(T)
Sergeants (17)
Mid-Managers (6)
.
CIlUl..t 'VISTA 1'OUCIl DBl'AltIJIENT
A-3
..
.
.
MEMORANDUM
F~ 10, 1994
TO: Growth Management Oversight Commission
nOM: James B. Hardiman, Fire Chief 9tf.f!'
SOBJECT: Fire Department Response Data: Fiscal Year 1992-93
INTRODUCTION
This report serves to update the Commission on the performance of
the Fire Department in responding to various emergencies in Chula
Vista's service area, and to apprise the Commission of developments
brought to light over the past -year regarding performance
measurement against the established Threshold Standards.
The Fire Department continues to maintain the highest level of
response efficiency possible. While the total call volUme for the
Fire Department has continued to increase, fire loss for the
reporting period (FY 92-93) was 40% lower than the previous year.
For your information, the calendar year 1993 Incidence ReSDonse
ReDort is attached.
THRESHOLD STANDARD PERFORMANCE DATA
The current Fire Department Threshold Standard requires 85% of all
emergency calls be responded to within seven (7) minutes. For
Fiscal Year 1992/93, the data collected indicates that the Chula
Vista Fire Department responded to 78% of the calls within 7
minutes. Although a cursory review of the data appears to indicate
that the Fire Department has not met the minimum Threshold
Standard, other factors exist (beyond those originally included in
the formulation of the Standard) which alter the appearance of
actual performance/compliance. As the following discussion
indicates, the statistical change from Fiscal Year 1991/92
compliance is a reflection of a change in the manner of collecting
the data and not a reduction of fire service levels for Fiscal Year
1992/93.
RESPONSE TIME COMPONENTS/DATA COLLECTION
There are three major components of response time:
(1) Dispatch Time
(2) Turnout Time
(3) Travel Time.
B-1
DisDatch Time is the time required by the Communications Center to ~
receive a call for service (call intake time) and the time to
dispatch an emergency vehicle to the incident. Turnout Time is the
time required by fire personnel to leave the fire station after
receipt of the dispatch instructions. Travel Time is the measured
component of driving to the incident location. The qeneral
relationship between these times are depicted in Figure 1. below.
I Call Intake I Dispatch
DISPATCH
TIME
Figure ~.
TURNOUT TRAVEL
TIME TIME
General Response 2'ime
Prior to July 1, 1992, the semi-automated dispatch system in place
at that time was not able to account for the Call Intake Time
(receipt of call, run card lookup and computer entry time)
subcomponent of the total Dispatch Time. Attached, is a 1987
report which outlines the difficulty in collecting accurate
dispatch time data for the purposes of establishing a solid Fire
Threshold Standard against which real performance may be measured.
The report, a recommendation of Threshold Standard levels by the
then Public Safety Director Bill Winters, states: ~
"Based upon current information sources, staff could not
establish an average Call Intake time and this component is
not included in the measurement of current response times."
In the subsequent establishing of criteria for dispatch time in the
formation of Fire Threshold Standards, an average dispatch time of
30 seconds was assigned because of the small degree of variance in
actual dispatching various calls for service. Call Intake Times,
conversely, vary widely with the nature of the call and the amount
of relevant information which may be needed for accurate
dispatching. As a result of this previously unknown variable, no
Call Intake time was included in setting the Standard. The
components of Response Time as reflected in the current Standard
are depicted in Figure 2., below.
Call Intake Dispatch
No Time 30 Seconds
Allotted
DISPATCH
TIME
TURNOUT
TIME
Figure 2. Response 2'ime
TRAVEL
TIME
"""
I
1) - 2..
'.
.
.
.
with the new communications equipment and methodology implemented
in July 1992, the system is now able to capture the total Dispatch
Time beginning with the Call Intake period. Average response times
comparing FY 1991/92 (before Call Intake Times were included) to FY
1992/93 (after Call Intake Times were included) are shown in Table
1., below.
Av.rage a..poD.. Tim..
I'y 1991/92 I'Y 1992/93
DISPATCH (Includes :20 DISPATCH (Includes :58
actual "Dispatch" Call Intake and
time only) Dispatch Times
TURNOUT :51 TURNOUT 1:03
TRAVEL 3:42 TRAVEL 3:48
TOTAL 4:42 TOTAL 5:49
Table 1.
As the Table 1. indicates, the average Fiscal ~ear 1992/93 Turnout
times and Travel times are statistically consistent with the
averages compiled for the previous reporting period (FY 1991/92).
As expected, the table also shows a marked increase (three-fold) in
the average Dispatch Time component. As previously discussed, this
is directly attributable to the more-accurate capturing of the
actual total dispatching period.
MAXIMIZING SERVICE DELIVERY
Actions continue by the Fire Department to ensure maximum
efficiency of our service delivery. A new response data base is
being established within the Fire Department where information
(actions taken at scene, location of engine company when dispatched
etc.) may be compiled and evaluated to maximize operational
effectiveness and minimize response times. In conjunction with the
police Department, we will also be making recommendations on the
possible adoption of an 800 MHz radio system, the computer-aided
dispatch system, and new records management system.
A computer-aided dispatch system (CAD) will greatly reduce the
"call intake" time component of the overall response times.
Functions now done manually (looking up address and grid cards)
would be done automatically. The earliest estimates for
implementing a CAD system are Fiscal Year 1996 or 1997. In the
interim, it will be important to maintain full staffing in the
1)- .3
Communications Center to ensure maximum efficiency during peak
demand period for both police aDS fire calls. ~
SUMMARY
The current method of collecting and reporting Fire Response Time
data is inconsistent with the parameters which were assigned when
the Fire Threshold Standard was adopted. In an effort to rectify
this inconsistency, one course of action the Commission may wish to
consider is to convene a task force to evaluate the response time
subcomponents and their impact on the Fire Service Threshold.
Should the Commission desire to consider such an approach, Staff
can return with specific recommendations in that regard.
JH/db
cc: George Krempl, Deputy City Manager
GMOC.93
""'"
,
""'"
n-4
.. INCIDENT RESPONSE REPORT FOR CALENDAR YEAR 1993
NUMBER OF INCIDENTS BY AGENCY
Agency Number or Calls ~ or Total
Chula Vista 7,512 54.8%
National City 3,288 24.0% ,
,
Imperial Beach 1,652 12.0%
Bonita Sunnyside F.P.D. 582 4.2%
San Diego/Other 688 5.0%
Total 13,722 100.0%
INCIDENTS IN CHULA VISTA
Type Number % or Total
Medical Aid Incidents 5,058 67.4%
. False Alarms -- All Types 856 11.4%
Fires: Total 753 10.0%
Structure Fires 169 2.2\11\
Grass. Trash & Mise Fires 380 5.1\11\
Vehicle Fires 204 2.7\11\
Other Citizen Assists 551 7.3%
Hazardous Conditions 236 3.1%
All Other Incidents 58 0.8%
Total 7,512 100.0%
INCIDENT RESPONSES BY COMPANY
Station Apparatus Calls Monthly Average ~ or Total
Station 5 Eng. 5225 2,172 181.0 23.1%
Station I Res. 5287 2,112 176.0 22.5%
Station 3 Eng. 5223 1,323 110.3 14.1%
Station 2 Eng. 5222 1,285 107.1 13.7%
Station 1 Eng. 5221 1,028 85.7 10.9%
Station 1 Trk. 5271 767 63.9 8.2%
Station 4 Eng. 5224 545 45.4 5.8%
. Station 6 Eng. 5226 160 29.1 1.7%
1>-5
.
..
November 10, 1987
-...,
TO: John
FROM: Bill
D. Goss,
Wi~~
City Manaqer
Public Safety Director
RE: Fire Service Thresholds
Staff have completed their review of fire department call
for service data. The fire response time threshold
recommended by the Coalition was:
Respond to 90% of emerqency calls within 6 minutes.
The Coalition recommendation
proposed threshold should
reflect) current performance
did, however,
be verified
levels.
indicate that the
by (and should
The department's current response time performance and
staff's recommendations are discussed below.
I. CURRENT PElU'ORKANCE
-...,
From the citizen's perspective, response time represents the
elapsed time between the call for service and the arrival of
the fire company. This span can be divided into four
distinct components. The first two components, call intake
and call dispatch time, represent the efficiency of the
communications system. The last two components, turn-out
and travel time, represent the efficiency and effectiveness
of fire resources. Each of the components is briefly
defined below.
COMMUNICATIONS CENTER VARIABLES
-
--Intake Time: The time taken by the communications
center to obtain the necessary information from the
caller, e.q. nature of the incident, location...
--Dispatch Time: The time taken by the communications
center to identify and notify the closest fire
company.
FIRE STATION VARIABLES
--Turnout Time: The time taken by the fire company to
depart the station after they've been notified of a ~
call.
1)-~
.
.'
'.
.
.
,. .
--Travel Time: The elapsed time from departure to
arrival on-scene.
The impact of new development and increases in service
workload can create resource gaps in fire networks as well
as in communication center operations. Changes in fire
. department response times may reflect the need for
additional fire stations, the need for additional
dispatcher or call intake positions or the need for
improvements in dispatching technology. In developing a
performance threshold for fire services, each time component
should be included in the measurement of overall response
times. In turn, any changes in performance over time can be
attributed to specific areas and appropriate corrective
measures designed. While this type of comprehensive
measure is most desirable, surveys of other cities indicated
that it is often not assessed due to various measurement
problems. In assessing the City's current response time
performance staff encountered several such problems. As
described below, most of the problems were solvable.
CUrrently, the department has a semi-automated computer
dispatch system for fire calls. The current system does
not, however, record call intake or call dispatching times.
During the call intake phase, the time needed to gather
relevant information varies considerably from call-to call.
Ba d cu rent information sources staff could not
establish an avera e call intake t me and t s com 0 e s
not included in the measurement of current res onse t meso
Conversely, there s generally only a small degree of
variance in the time need to dispatch a call. As such, an
average dispatch time of 30 seconds was included in
assessing current response time performance.
A second data problem occurred because the current system
records turnout and travel times in minutes rather than
minutes and seconds. For computing current performance, it
was assumed that turnout and travel times were evenly
distributed within the measured categories.
In summary, the measurement of the department's current
response times includes estimates of three components:
dispatch, turn-out and travel time. (It is important to
note that a new computer-aided dispatch system, targeted for
implementation in Calendar Year 1989, will measure dispatch
time and will provide accurate measures of turnout and
travel times. The new system may also provide an accurate
measure of call intake time.)
'B-7
,
.'
.
--..
The department's current response time to emergency calls is
shown below:
, of Emergency Calls
Responded To:
Within 5 minutes
64'
80'
90'
Within 6 minutes
Within 7 minutes
II. UCOMHENDED ~SBOLD STUDARD
The response time threshold recommended by the Coalition
was.:
Respond to 90' of emergency calls within 6 minutes
The Coalition recommendation did, however, indicate that the
proposed threshold level should be verified by current
performance.
Based upon the response time data detailed above, the ~
following recommendations are made concerning a citywide
threshold for fire services:
RECOMMENDATION 11
That the threshold be stated in terms of
the Dercentaae of calls reBDonded to
.i~hin a ..ven (7) .iDU~. r..aODS. ~im..
Differences in the road network, terrain and
housing density result in a somewhat higher
response time to service calls in the eastern
section of the City. The 7 minute standard is
more appropriate for a citywide threshold since it
more adequately accounts for these operational
differences.
UCOMHENDATION 21
~ha~ ~h. ~hr..ho14 be ..~~li.h.4 helow
~h. ....urad Derrormanc. 1...1 ~o
.CCOUD~ ror Bormel Y..r-~o-v.ar
varia'tion.
This variation would be expected to occur without
any change in population or service demand, and
reflects normal changes in the geographic
distribution of calls. A variance factor of 2.5'
is recommended.
-,
1)-g
.
'.
RBCOMKENDATION 3:
That the thr.shold b. .stabli.h.d b.low
the ....ur.d D.rrorm.nc. l.v.l . to
.ccount ror ch.na.. in r.SDons. tim..
.ED.ct.d durina the initi.l Dh... or
4.v.loDm.nt.
Although a new fire sttion may be planned for an
area, there is generally an insufficient workload
during the early stages of development to warrant
staffing the new station. (Annual operating costs
for a fire station are estimated at $500,000. )
This expected lag will, in turn, result in an
expected downturn in response time performance
over the short term. As such, it is recommended
that the thr.eshold represent a "start-up" ractor
of 2.5%. In this regard, the threshold would
represent a floor below which service levels could
not fall.
Taking into account the "normal variance" and "start-up"
factors, it is recommended that the threshold service level
be established at 5% below current performance.
.
RBCOMKENDED CITY-
WIDE STANDARD:
To r.spond to 85% or ...rg.ncy
c.lls within 7 minut.s.
staff has met with the Board of Directors of Chula vista's
International Association of Fire Fighters (IAFF). At that
meeting staff presented the proposed service threshold and
explained the process used to develop the threshold. The
IAFF Board did not express disagreement with the proposed
threshold of maintaining an 85% response rate to emergency
calls within 7 minutes.
Lastly, as previously mentioned, a new computer-aided
dispatch (CAD) system is planned for the near future. When
this system is installed, the response time standard should
be reviewed and adjusted according to the enhanced
information available at that time.
.
cc: Gene Asmus
Sid Morris
Jim Thomson
George Krempl
Sam Lopez
Marty Chase
n-q
.
.
SWEETWATER AUTHORn
505 GARRETT AVENUE
POST OFFICE BOX 2328
CHULA VISTA, CALIFORNIA 91912-2328
(619) 420-1413
FAX (619) 425-7469
GOVERNING BOARD
SUE JARRETT, CHAIRMAN
BUD POCKLINGTON. VICE CHAIRMAN
EDWIN J. STEELE
GEORGE H. WATERS
MARGARET A. WELSH
JAMES S. WOLNIEWICZ
CARY F WRIGHT
WANDA AVERY
TREASURER
OIAN J. REEVES
SECRETARY-ADMINISTRATIVE AIDE
February 11, 1994
Fi="~ -
._u ~;
,,-, ~
i.'),. .
Mr. Ed Batchelder
Associate Planner
city of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
.
Subject: 1993 GMOC REPORT - SERVICE AVAILABILITY STATUS
Dear Mr. Batchelder:
This is in response to your request letter dated February 4, 1994
to provide an evaluation of Sweetwater Authority's ability to
accommodate forecasted growth considering both short and long-term
perspectives.
The San Diego county Water Authority and Metropolitan Water
District continue their efforts to improve the reliability of the
region's water supply system and its ability to weather a repeat of
the 1991 drought situation. Metropolitan Water District has
acquired a large reservoir site in the Domenigoni Valley in
Riverside county for the construction of a reservoir to store
excess water during periods of plentiful supply to provide for
drought or other emergencies, such as earthquakes. Construction of
the second pipeline by the San Diego county Water Authority to
serve the South Bay should be completed this year. This will
provide the necessary redundancy to minimize interruptions of water
supply as a result. of planned or unplanned shlltdolo.'lls of a one-
supply pipeline.
Partly as a result of the establishment of the Chu1a Vista
Interagency Task Force, Sweetwater Authority and Otay Water
District continue to coordinate their water supply and service
activities in Chu1a Vista.
Sweetwater Authority had approximately 38,500 acre feet of water in
storage in Loveland and Sweetwater Reservoirs as of January 31,
1994. This amount of water is equivalent to approximately 20
months of imported water supply. Sweetwater Authority does not
intend to purchase imported water for at least the next 12 months.
The expected delivery to consumers for 1994 is 23,500 acre feet for
the 12 month period.
C.-I
A Public Agency,
Serving National City, Chula Vista and Surrounding Areas
Mr. Ed Batchelder
Associate Planner
City of Chu1a Vista
Re: 1993 GMOC Report - Service
Availability Status
February 11, 1994
page 2
--',
In regards to the 1992 GMOC's report pertaining to water, the
Authority has the following updates for the 1993 report:
1. The Authority has continued to provide information to
consumers regarding water conservation programs and is
maintaining a voluntary conservation status. Changes in
types of landscaping using xeriscape, as well as other
water use changes, have been recommended to our customers
since the origination of our Water Conservation Program.
2. The Authority continues to work closely with staff of the
City of Chu1a vista as plans develop for the bayfront.
3.
The Authority continues to study a brackish groundwater
desalination project. This project will extract
groundwater from the Lower Sweetwater River. preliminary
design and an Environmental Impact Report has commenced
for this project.
--,
4.
The Authority continues investigating the
surplus water in groundwater aquifers
injection/extraction wells in the San Diego
storage of
by using
formation.
5. A study will be performed to evaluate the feasibility of
increasing the storage capacity of Sweetwater Reservoir.
6. Sweetwater Authority is not considering the use of
reclaimed water at this time because it does not appear
to have a hi~h probability of becoming available in the
foreseeable future. If it were available, we have a
potential use of blending with feed water for the
demineralization facility.
7. Sweetwater Authority staff continues to work with the San
Diego County Water Authority on the development of a
desalination plant in the South Bay area. However, this
project has been put on hold by the County Water
Authority until further notice.
The Authority has produced a report indicating what needs
to be done and how much it would cost the otay Water
District to utilize Sweetwater Reservoir as an emergency
source of supply.
8.
.........
c-z
'.
.
.
Mr. Ed Batchelder
Associate Planner
City of Chula Vista
Re: 1993 GMOC Report - Service
Availability status
February 11, 1994
page 3
9. Rezoning of older residential communities in Chula Vista
to multi-unit housing continues to aake existing small
diameter cast iron pipes unable to meet the required fire
flow demands. Sweetwater Authority requests that
consideration be given to this situation when land use
decisions increase demands on the water supply
infrastructure. An improvement in communication between
the project owner, the Planning Department and Sweetwater
Authority has been noted in the last year.
10. Sweetwater Authority and Otay Water District are working
through the San Diego County Water Authority to develop
a region wide "Highly Reliable Water Supply Rate"
available for industry. This effort is in response to
the mayor of Chula Vista's request for a firm water
supply for new industry.
Since the Statement of Concern is not included in the 1993 report,
as it was in the 1992 report, the Authority assumes that the GMOC
is no longer concerned that a potentially seriou. problem exists
with respect to water in Sweetwater Authority. Finally, the
Authority is in the process of updating our Master Plan. Once the
update is complete, a copy will be forwarded to the Committee.
Very truly yours,
SWEETWATER AUTHORITY
Richard A. Reynolds
General Manager
RAR:HM:ln
pc:
Mr. James Smyth, Chief Engineer, Sweetwater Authority
Mr. Hector Martinez, Associate Engineer, " "
k:\lorelel\wp51\IIDC.ltr
C-3
...CDedicated to COl.m"nit~ gelvice
~
105i5 JAMACHA BOULEVARD, SPRING VALLEY, CAliFORNIA 91977
TELEPHONE: 670-2222. AREA CODE 819
February 25, 1994
Mr. Ed Batchelder
Growth Management OVersight Commission
City of Chula vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Subject: 1993 Threshold Standards Review and Comment (G.F. 202)
Dear Mr. Batchelder:
We have reviewed the City's 12-18 month and 5-7 year development
forecasts and offer the following comments:
The 12-18 month forecast of 1,668 units appears
significantly higher than what we eXpect to occur. During
1993 Otay added 441 meters to our entire system. We ~
estimate that approximately 410 meters will be sold in the
July 1993 through June 1994 time frame within the City of
Chula Vista. Even if this number of finished units
significantly increase next year, the projection appears to
be more than twice what may occur.
The 1,059 to 1,485 units per year for the next 5-7 years
also appears somewhat high. We would expect a unit count in
the 800-1000 per year range based on historical averages for
otay.
Accomplishments During the Past Year
On the regional front, the county Water Authority is progressing
on the construction of Pipeline No. 4 which is expected to bp.
completed by winter 1995. This pipeline will substantially
increase the treated water delivery capacity to Otay as well as
provide an additional level of reliability from the standpoint
that there will be a treated water and raw water pipeline coming
to south County.
CWA continues with their efforts to provide for emergency storage
needs for delivery to their member agencies in the event of
supply outages from MWD deliveries. There are a number of
alternatives they have identified and the various options are
capable of sustaining long term MWD delivery interruptions.
---,
e-4-
'.
.
.
Mr. Ed Batchelder
Growth Management OVersight Commission
city of Chu1a Vista
February 25, 1994
Page 2
The District recently completed a study entitled "Emergency Water
Supply Options", which developed a complete list of potential
options. The intent of these options is to meet the goal of
maintaining independence, for a minimum of ten continuous days,
from potable water deliveries by CWA to the District in the event
of planned or emergency aqueduct shutdowns. CWA has stated to
its member agencies that each agency should plan to independently
supply their water demands for ten continuous days. The study
compared the various options and indicates that the more viable
options include agreements with the city of San Diego for Lower
Otay Reservoir/Treatment capacity for the central and southern
portions of the District and an agreement with Helix for Levy
Treatment Facility capacity for the northern portion of the
District. Water storage for the northern area could be provided
through the storage OWD has in
San Vincente and transfer agreements with CWA and Helix to paper
move water to E1 Capitan Reservoir.
The County Water Authority has been working with the Helix Water
District, Padre Dam Municipal Water District and OWD to increase
the Levy Treatment Plant capacity for increased delivery
abilities to otay and Padre Dam. CWA staff is scheduled to
present their recommendation to the CWA Board in April 1994.
Otay has been working with the City of San Diego where
significant progress has been made towards acquiring storage and
treatment within the Lower otay Reservoir system. The city of
San Diego is interested in increasing utilization of their excess
storage and treatment abilities to enhance water utilization.
The storage and treatment capabilities would be utilized by Otay
to meet our five-day storage goal through agreement with the City
of San Diego. This emergency water supply would provide for
planned or emergency aqueduct outages. In this way, Otay won't
need to construct ten days of covered reservoir storage in order
to sustain a planned or emergency outage from CWA.
The District is in the process of updating and modifying our 1991
Draft Water Resources Master Plan. This effort will incorporate
the concepts of water storage and supply from neighboring water
agencies in order to sustain a CWA supply outage. The basic
concept is to provide for five days of storage within Otay Water
District water storage facilities and the remaining needs through
negotiated aqreements whereby the City of San Diego and Helix
would provide emergency supplies to Otay during aqueduct outages.
The District continues on schedule with the construction of a
major 30 MG terminal reservoir adjacent to EastLake parkway.
c.-5
Mr. Ed Batchelder
Growth Management oversight Commission
City of Chula vista
February 25, 1994
Page 3
--..
This reservoir, when completed in the summer of 1994, will help
the District meet our five-day covered storage goal.
Representatives from Sweetwater Authority, Chula Vista city
Council and Otay have continued to meet during the past year to
address issues of joint concern as well as keep the city informed
regarding state-wide water shortages which may impact development
within Chula Vista.
The District has a Water Conservation Program ordinance to reduce
the quantity of water used by customers for the purpose of
conserving water supplies and avoid or minimize the effects of
any future shortages. Irrigation water services, under normal
water supply conditions (non-drought water stages in effect), may
receive a seasonal allotment of water equal to 48 inches per
year. This maximum allotment is reduced depending upon the water
drought stage ordered by CWA.
On the reclaimed water front, Otay continues to actively pursue ~
the development of reclaimed water facilities within new
development projects. In this manner, reclaimed water will be
used to provide for irrigation, thereby offsetting the needs for
additional emergency potable water storage. The District is
fully supportive of the construction of an advanced wastewater
treatment plant in the Otay River Valley which would provide
reclaimed water for their newly built distribution facilities.
I hope this information
threshold performance.
please let me know.
Very truly yours,
provides help in the review of the
If I can be of any further assistance,
Y N. Stanton
partment Head
Engineering and Planning
TNS:JFP/mds
IlATDI.DR,DOC
--.
c-~
.
.
o
i~
0-<
::I
Z::l
0:)
ii)1I)
!211)
::IZ
::10
OJ::
00
....-<
xo
Oz
ii)j::
o::z
ww
~i!l
......1
zl1.
w::I
::1-
WII)
Oz
-<0
z_
-<....
::I~
xz
~~
0::1
0::0
00
l')W
en 0::
en
...
.
lii ..
(I,i
z
o
-
...
o
<C(
C) ...
.~.,;j.
z.-
.wO
2z
w:)
~8
:E
-~
.....0
fi
<C(W
~x
w....
u
w
Z
fa.
II)
o
a..
o
0::
a..
1l,
0'"
-..
1lQi::E
OlC
", ,-
'j ::> '"
.c::.oC
'" '" ,2
.- Q)-
.c::,!!!
~~1l
CUQ)::
"'~ a>
8.> ",
12 I.L Qi
e.",Ol
- ",
CJ)t:~
::Ea>.o
o:::E'O
2S'lii1::
< e...
e..>a>e.
a>0 '"
S8"
-::'0
00 C
_a.::>
.. a> 0
i!;.c::e..>
"'- ,.,
e..c:: .0
e._ ,
"'j ~
~ ~O'>
Q)"CCD__
~~:2 ~
C::> '" a>
-cc
8.~ 8-=l
~
~
Iii
(.)
::::i
o
ll.
~Ol
-c
0"6
C
co2
o
~~
.l!!..
cm
~ 8
a> a>
is.c
,~ Ol
c
,.,.-
"Q)"g
Eo
:;:; .=
1:: -
8. E ,
Co,!! ~
i ~.Q
",-
'iien8
c::E-
So:::iii
e..>~-g
~e..> ..
e..> ll!
~l.~
_ c
lIle.c::
~ e.]l
...:1
~
~
.9
-
c
Gl
::>
i
.0
::>
'"
~
III
,.,
Gl
c
o
",c:
0.2
.c::1ii
"'-
I!! cGl
.c::
-E
a>~
.c:: e.
-E
Gl'-
m .U)
.2E
~.!!
~~
oen
-::E
~!!:
",0
~~
.~ Q)
oS
"!
~
a>
.c::
~-
::>-
g ~
o
'E:c
...l!!
",c
c Gl
.l!!E
en a>
,,,is.
o.~
~.s
I!!-
~:Ii
::>
8lir
~~
a.::>
Gl'"
Sffi
o~
c Gl E
.2 l5 Gl
'tV _U)
::>=,.,
CiBU)
> III en
q> .E ::E
i [~ ~u.."1
~ li'e..>
"!
~
C-I
,
~
Gl::!:
.oc
CD 0'-
.0_",
_ c
'e :g,,2
"",-
.c::::>!!!
.Q.c ~
'i:gli
, ",
iii~_
'" 0'> Gl
8.~ .w
12> ::>
e.1.L .0
-
en",o
::E""1::
o:::c..
_Gle.
oE",
<1::..
e..> :g, 0=
Gl a> '"
.c::OC
- ::>
_I!!o
0._ e..>
_u..Gl
~Q)..c
.....c::-
"'- ,.,
e..c:: .0
e._ .
"'j-g~
:;;",~~
"C Q) CD ..-
.- "C:2 ..
U):JU)Q)
c-c:c
0'" 8::>
0.5 ...,
~
N
~
..
'"
'"
8
Gl
c
.!!
.. .
'C E
e.Gl
em
e.,.,
e.",
III en
"'::E
Co:::
..-
-0
g!<
ee..>
e.",
e.a>
Ill",
0=8.
ge
se.
e..>Gl
~s
u"':-
a>.e
.c:: Ol
-c
-:0
.. c
~o2
~
.,;1 N
.9
-
C
Gl
::>
.,.
Gl
'"
.0
::>
'"
~
..
Gl
,.,
Gl
c
o
", c:
- 0
0.-
.c::-
",.l!!
I!! c
.c::Gl
-E
Gl~
.c:: e.
-E
a>'-
15 ..(I)
.2E
~!
I!!~
oen
-::E
11::0:::
.l!!2S
"'<
'Oe..>
.~ a>
oS
'"
N
Gl
.0
:20
0-
.c::_
'" c
I!! a>
~g
!~ E
.- ::::J (1)
u.U)1i)
Gl~,.,
.c::..",
-Gl
- ,.,en
~Gl::E
I)aei:
.- 0
~ 2:-<
.!!e..>
a> III a>
.O!: E.c::
en')( -
:Ii 12'0
.c:: e. c
~ li',g
EcS
8 j!:Ii D::
~ i j! I!:!
m"Cc.!C
~ 5,E ~
'"
N
",
Gl
~ c
Gl'-
8~
-g~
",..
8. '0 .
e'c 1::
e.iii 8.
='6 I!!
!!! .c:: Gl
"''''0
CD m c
.c:: I!!
-~Gl
.e-
...: c
o E 0
~8e..>
::!: C'u
Gl 0 c
.c::e..>::>
--8
,.,0
.o"'Gl
Gl-.c::
oc-
cGlo
IIlE-
::::J.!C
gJ.!!-
.;: Cf) i
.E"CE
CDffi"5
el'!:lll
e.~ <
~~.5
~
M
,
......
,
Gl
.c::
-
.9
E
8 '
c'"
0'0
e..>'c
-
-Ill
0'-
o
J!l~
c Gl
Gl-
E~
.!!>
..,.,
-.l!!
eno
a>
::>",
'" c
.~ cu
._~
""C
g~
e..>::>
<
~~
e..>.!!
~~
=$
~~
...1
~
M
~
0)
z
Q
t-
o
.
CI
z...
i=...I
z.....
WZU
:e
w;::)
~8
.:e>
. ''0::''F/
"'-,::::'.....
)ou
0::
.W
mi!:
W
o
W
Z
.~
Q
W
0)
o
Q.
o
0::
Q.
I
z
o
j::,
c(
Q
Z
W
:e
~
o
W
a::
o
o
~
CI
~
o
LJ..
.><Gl
Ul:5
1-01 0 ;(
-Gl
~ .>< c:
BOG)
~.2l:5
~.<:::
'"' 8. ""
gGl~
Gl ~ c:
OlOlO
c( ..
~ .<::: 01
CD ~ ....
"E:C~
~ 'Uj
CD6c
.<:::.- 8
-'0
00l~
:;-c.E
"c: _
~Ol~
co em"
Eo~.!!!
.- <.l
Ul _ '"'
0)0"-0
c: " Gl
.j l;l1l ~
0.- '0 Gl
= 'C 0 .:;
S 5 !
Gl - '"'
.c _..o:!2
_LLUO
Cii~O~
Gi<(:!:!
0:: ::::.C!l :5
~
N
M
:::
c
o
2
0::
I!!
;
~
01
a.
-g Gl
01 :5
t:Glc:2l
o.c 0 :::]
CL- UJ ~
C.r:nE....
~.E ~..c:
> <.l
-c -0 OlO.:=
c: ~
ctI ~ is. ~
.- Ul
GlUlOi'O
g>~ C:.C: >.
s~g:ii15..
8Gl~-cg.
c:08.~Ul
CD-C.!:""
~~-c~i
~:wffi-~
Ull:_l'l-c
0l.!!!l'l.Q~
= (f)"ii).c 0
<.l Gl '"'.8- a.
C:_.c E
"l'la. .-
8.2'Q"g8
~m_ m
ub5i~ 2l
alg'E>ffi
.<::: .- a.U -c
-"EoQ)c
1;jR~:58.
.c:l:)Gl_Gl
t-m"Co"'O
,01
~~
c:.E
" '"'
8~1il
.~ !l
Ul'OUl
.!! m Ct'I
<.l
c: Ol Gl
Q) C:"'C .
Ol.c .;;; ~
01 c: e c:
al~a.5
U)"O:!2U
~ c 5 0
Sm3=~
.55.<::: i5
;; a..2 c:
C11 Q."e: co
-~3=(/)
~-Ec:
mO,!!:2
en c.:!:
Oi~c:~
0"00>'
- c:.- C.
.... 32 m c..
~ ~.~ ~
.!!!Q)~r-
m'50.!:
Gl 01
Q) ~"C 3:
c: ._ "-
'a. ~ .! !!
o ::::J m m
CDw5:E
>-c(QaJ
~'i ~1ij
"!
~
N
M
Ul
Gl
'c,~
.!!-
~Ol
1i).E
-ct!
c: 01
OlOl
Ul ~
~~
OlU
c: Gl
0.<:::
E-
E -g ...:
80l.!!
Ul 01
C)'t) 3=
C:.C:
1aUial
.515 E
t! .-
om.!!
81;j<.l
~ ~
-goo
Ol!_
c:
OlGlGl
.5:; E
a. a.
o Ol 0
QiC:-
> 0 Gl
Gl E ili
OOl-c
.c
~
N
M
c-",
Gl
Ol
~
.9
Ul
()
c:
Gl
2'
Gl
E
Gl
-
c:
Gl
Ul
~
a.
Ul
't
.'"
Ui
i5
~
.!!
~
!
-
o
c:
o
~.
""'"'
"C u
m=
<38.
~
~
N
M
E
Gl -c ~ ~
.<::: c:
- 01 .!! "
Ul
Olcn _Ul-c o)c .-
.5 c: C:~Q) -g.5Gl~
Ol.- OlGlUl ca1i5.9.cQ)
~ ::!:::_o
" l!! "c:a. C)'x U) ,Q.c:::
~.5 Ul.- e cO) .c-
.'" i:= cGiQ. .- 0 ~ ~ c:
8:5Gl :!2 _ .-
OGl .- c: en
'<:::Ul -co.<::: ".-e'O~
-Gl c:-c- aJO)Q.Q)::J
" ~
0( Gl Olc:Ol "0 c:... "O'u
It:: m.5 c::,;:::;c"-2
~Ol me.! 0._
GlOl J!! m t) ~
~~ ~O)CI)""U)
002= ~Gl.-o~
.- - m _Ul_
Ol> Ul > .- c c:
~() .5 co 6 LJ..._ 8 ~.5
- .'"
c: c: &"5 U Q) c)OmO~ .
" Gl c: B -c.2: c:.... .c c.~
-- Q) en'" c..-
OOl o c: 0:: e;t::G>..i::Ju
u~ "C-cu>.
Gl canJ"- U)Q)
Gl E c: 0 0) m ii:E1CiiCii:5
:5 Gl .a ~.5 (5 Gl --
0- "C=c 0.1:: m ~ '0
-0 c.cC)Q) C-I;...!
~ "-"ii) .c:. .CChC.Q)CC
Gl c: m(/)Q)_
ii~ t::m"Cl:: mC3:~oe
o oS:! .- cQ)Q) (/)"C
-<.l C. Q) 0)- .-E.-cn-cOl
01 " g.=.5: ~ 0) > c:::::J
~ ct::~ocaC"
.....1;) . Ch.....OC. W 01 -
oc:~ 00 ffi C a._ - E E
c: 0 c: Gl Gl c: ~ Gl
<.l " -cc:o .cOQ) "CQ)
.Q 0 Q)oti=:.c; - E Q) 1;)
i!!alu ~:.c; _ ca J3~8"!m;
01 Gl 0 .5 ~ m E ....ii)"ii m.c:
a.a.Ol cn;:e.!2 .! ::J > ~ '- 1::
Gl Ul Gl
Q:J3o 0> m 0 Q)OQ)mUo
U Q) c. ~ a::: Z "C Q).5: c
"t:!
~ N '" , .~
N N N N
M M M ,
~
..;1
N
M
.
>-
10
(I)
z
o
:-j;..::,;:,:.:-:
~......
c,.
z
j: ...f
io
Il~
....0
Q.U
Ii
....~
~u
<~
(1)1-
fa
U
w
~
Q
w
(I)
o
Q.
o
0:
Q.
.
z
o
....
t-
a
z
w
Ii
Iii
o
fd.
0:
g
I
.
III
III J:::.
o -
! c: .!a c:
.a ~_:2
.2li;C:!.1""
- 8.'!!!. ~
'iij~IIlK~
- -c "C 'I:
Oc: ...0
""5l'l.!!=
U c:; :::::I ftli :J
c: Cl'" ~ <(
g_ f!!"C...
e..>Nc:5.!!
0.2"'2~
... _ 0 en.,:::;
gO"fiJ:::.al
+:oc:.c.!Q;:
~~~tloo
!E Q.JIl e! III
oou,gs
c: Qj .1Il <( ,..
,..>e' .0
~~ CLb"C ~
ClJQ)4i~m=
~ :; :; ~ 8.~
.- Cl 0 n
> c: ... c:; .....
e'-6SCL,!
Q.~:C ~ Cl~
0> c: .5.c:;
-c: "'.., III III
t=.- _IIl.o1ll
~.!Il;Jt:~~
_llll:dic: ~
~&.5.~51~
.=e~c:!o
Oa.~OQ....J
'l'
N
M
..
i:
o
..
II::
I!!
;
...1
....5
III
8~
alS
~8
2::l .
Q. t:
=00
e! e..> Q.
..,a.!!!
III <( l'l
J:::.1Ilc:
+::5!
oo~
>.- "'E
"'EO
::El'le..>
1Ilc:'(i
SOe:
,..e..> ::J
.0_0
oe..>
l'l- III
C:C:J:::.
",1Il_
::J E 0
",1Il_
.!!lEo
~oo_
.e..,5i
III c: E
>"'J:::.
2 ~ 0
Q.~ '"
~~~
~
""
~
<
III
=
.s
E
l'l
c:
o
e..>
'l5
t:
::i
cc
;:)
-
c:
~
.!!
.l1l~
000
",e..>
a.
1Il<(
::J~
.!ll :g
-
.- '"
0._
50
8'E!
~'E
._ 0
e..>e..>
III c:
=.2
_'5
"'=
~~
II::
;c
~
..;1 ""
!! i€
o .!!l ~
E ~ c:
.8... 1,;;.0
_o~=:c
c: 1Il'- e! e!
Q)c:(J"CQ)
Eo'-cu:2
t::_CD en
'" OJ:::. Q.C:8ct
~C)o..Q Q)
C:5"C~(JT""
"'C:1Il0
0).- CU"D' ...:
'~~Clo::E.8
c:8<(-Clo
.!!! _0 ai,go'O
Q.Q)Z1i
1Il~<('C:"'C:
.s::.OVJa..t::..-
-u...occn
III o~oc:
N"" Q.E'-
'C: '" e..> Q. 0
o~a..m....c
.cr-<c-c:wQ)
... m ...0 E
iillllt.;E~;E
._JijO ill III 8
g,-::E..,c:~
::J'oCl", III III
os m co:;.:;
U"C..c::_...CD
bc-VlQ)'"
.-cao~>a;
() co='
~~~~'E~
-E.ct:::mcu
-51E~-g.:
2",1Il III ",Ill
t-cuEo1D:5
N
""
~
:E c:
lil'-~
.., .-
Oem
-"'::J
al -0
'" Cl ~
<('-
.- <(
~o
"'ZlO
.8<(C:
00 .2
'E..,g>
"'C:II::
..,'"
C:OIll
.l1le..>=
"'a.-
..,<(0
oQ)cn
J:::.J:::.C:
"'_ 0
!!!J:::.:!1!
.1::=>
-i:e
~c:Q.
- .2 III
!ll'1;;=~
o .5 Cl ~
.: 'E .5 <(
<2'E~
Q)~Q)>-
=~E5l'
_cueD_
"'=Ci.e!
~.8.5 Ci5
N
""
C-.3
.?:> al
'" -
::J 1Il-
o "_ Q.. 2'-
.;; ~ E~
!!!.....8c:
Q.. c '-
>."0 CD c
..,a..c:o
::J!IIt-:c
-~ e!
OO::J . III
c:oQ)-c
o en ~.-
.- CD UJ
'lUJ:::.'_C:
Cl- '" 8
.-." .-
-".s::....
::i!:>.-S
",,,,
'0 i! "'.-
"'1Il!!!g
c.."C"CI ::J
Ec:"'o
-::J"'e..>
c'C.8Q)
Q)c_.c
Emu-
= -:;:!!!
2 "" ~ 0
c:u~....
w 5 c:.8
_00
8 e..> .!!l.8
.c: ~ ~"C
~ .0"5
_al",o
C:N J:::.
.- .t: Q) fI)
.2, 0:2 ,..""
Q).c>"C0)
.c:'52.am
~mc.fI)__
~
ori
~
8
:z:
u
U)
..,s
c: '"
"'.-
>
Cl", .
.E_ fI)
-::J-
Q.J:::. 8
0e..>J:::.
.., 0
"'EOO
.5 Q) ...
ou;S
'C: Q) fI)
'lil~Sl
is .5 u.
o.!2"'g
08'"
J:::.J:::. -
~IHl
~'l5 II::
.l1lc:l!!'
i.Q ctI
E '" ::J
c:0'
~ ~oo
w)(.l1l
:> III .!!l
cj g>>
1Il'E~
J:::.1Il'"
=E"S
.19 ~.Q
III Q. t:
<(.5 ~
~
,.;1 ori
Cil
.8
'"
'"
'"
III
E
'"
'"
~
N
ori
.
M
.
"'Cl
c: c:
m=
III ::J
E~
!!!"fi
0'"
Ci.1Il
)( >
Q):c
~~
III 0
~2
0'-
"'J:::.
OCl
_::J
III 2
::JJ:::.
c:-
:CO)
c: c:
0._
0..,
.s.~ .
fl~lll
.C ~ ::J
1;) 0.2"
'6-.fi
-8J!
~~-g
lIS Ill'"
Q) :m en
=~'8
Q) =.c:
e>"'11
::>.9E
N
ori
~
ff)
z
o
i=
~
C)
z
.... ..I
.z-
wU
:ez
w;:)
....0
0.0
!~
>0
O::w
c(x:
~....
w
o
w
z
Q
w
ff)
o
0.
~
0.
z
o
oj:;
c(
Q
Z
w
:Ii
:e
o
o
w
0::
Co)
o
:E
C)
...
Ul
c:
o
c::::-
.- III
Ul.2
mal....
~ii.g
c._ Gl
e.l!l:!2
C.lii~
'CEc..
Gl c: ~
E e 0
g.'> u;
_ c:_
~4)8
Gl-O.c:
-oGlU
1:10(1)
0'- C
c:g&.
.2 m J
UIllUl
IllUlU
_Ullll
cu..9:! c..
C:C:E
~ :::J._ c:
:2j9Q),2
~,!!~10
.c: > 1ll.2'
:'!: to C):!::::
~:;:gE
O..r::: 0 CD
-CJ -
Gl C:1ll
::I E Gl'C:
.5GllOg.
--0'-
I:: U)._ c..
OQ)"CQ.
CJ ~.5 III
'"
.,;
,;;
-
c
o
2
~
o
o
::J:
(.)
ell
-
,!!!ocn
.E ~"E
".- III
"""'~"C"C
E Gl c: c:
meSaJ
1;) ';: U) J!!
Cbo'"Om
~ -::I
c:~~ lif
';.~~-g
't:Gl.c:
l'l~~~
e :c ,5 0
o.m1;)-
>-~'XGl
C_Q):::J
<<115_'"0
Gl 0_
c:lllc::;
omOU)
NQ):.;::::;e
ebcu_
c:>=
.s.- l!! ~ c:
en:s! go!! ,Q
C:::I III glO
00
't\i ~ 0.c:.2'
o co:'!:
='ficncnE
8::cmSm
lll~c-o:C
>. JQ)aI
c:!! _:!:!
GlcnCUCU::l
05!!le lif
Gl
.c:
-
l!!
.l2
~
Gl
.0
-0
:;
o
.c: .
Uld')
-0",
ffi~
c:>-
0:;
:;:;...,
~c:
c..-
E c:
8.Q
",j!!
c: Gl
't: "C
m'w
c: g
Ul U
,- ~
>-.l2
-0
::1.-
cng
~6
~CJ
'<t
.,;
>-~
-0 Gl
.a -Ill Gl oJ
Ul .c: c:
~-Gl
g!Gl~E
.- Q).- c..
-~cO
l!!enGl-
Gl -0 Gl
c.."C'- &i
OC:O"O
81ll-_
OJ ~'E.!!!
; S '0 "E
_r:::CLQ)
OGllll:!2
E '" Ul
5.!! :::J! .
:;:;w 0 c!:.!!!
~ ,en 0 0
c.>"'C c: 0
8Ecj ffi-g~
- -Ill
~~-rl0i~
Q)()'C::o:::;,U
EQ)1i)c:c:
:;:;..r:::'- Q) 0
_c"C c..
t::8. c: 15 'gj ::I
0)01;.>>
~i~ ~l
,SL2,C': C)
Gl ~,2' 0 ~
::I",::J:UlGl
C:c: -
'-GlC:U-O
- o III
C:"C.-c."C
o c: c: E c:
CJ ::I:::l._ III
'<t
.,;
C-4/
-
III
.c:
-
l!!
::I
Ul
c:
Gl
-u
Gl
'[
c.
-
c:
,g
~
CD
Gl .
=al
c: Ul
o Ul
Gl
Ul~
c:-o
0-0
.- III
U>-
ta-
-.2
c:
Gl l!!
6-1ll
Gl Ul
UlGl
.0 ::I
::I Ul
en.!!
.c:Ul
"'-
::I 0
eo
.c:.c:
~ g
on
.,;
Oi
:;:;
c:
Gl
:21:5
m.~
~ e
.c:o.
:8c
E,g
~CiI
-CD
Ul Gl
U.c:
ta_
o.c:
.~ .-
-
oii
o E
tic.
UlO
'OJ
c: Gl
0-0
:.i:i-
~~
2i
E-o
'w
:2e
,
~ 5
'S c:
lif-o
o::ffi
on
.,;
l!!
.!!l.l2
Ul Gl
111.0
Ill~
Gl-o
-0-
.- ::I
> 0
e.c:
c.Ul
>-
'i -g
-
ct/J"<i
.-... 0)
o Ill",
ll.r=~
~ -
.~
::I Gl ::I
0::1-:0
~,~.5
:!:!cnc:
~:E .Q
CiI~~
'" U Gl
c:Ill-o
Gl e'w
-0 c. c:
c: c. 0
::I III U
>-o~
"C_.E
::I
1;) -5 'u
'C:Es
'0 ~ 0
'-1::0
Gl 0 Gl
.c: c..c:
1-::1-
co
.,;
-0
Oic:
.- III
~~
'w CJ
Gl Gl
~.c:
, -
c:_
go
m~
o
Ets
e III
--
Ul
0):::0
c: III
Eel)
:J "i5 .
Ul::lU
~ -'I::
::1-
J!! E.!a
UGl-o
Ill.c:-
~- g
.- .s"fi
Gl_Ul
-c:
~Gl~
.- E III
:!:::: c.-
E 0 c:
_Gl
~g!E
"SQ).!!
U.-oGl
co
.,;
-0
c:
III
ui
Gl
::I '"'
Ul Gl
.~ 1i
g'E
'2 .~
:s~
::1-
00
~!!l
010
J1i)
Gl Gl
-0=
Gl",
=c:
.s'E
~ III
~~
~Gl
taUl
c:
-00
C:c.
Gl Ul
Ul l!!
.sill
11:",
.l!lc:
cn:::;
Ul
uGl
l!! ::I
i5~
......,
..;1
'"
.,;
I'-
.,;
I
"f
.......,
=m0
->~
.s SIll'8
..._J::J::
~~ ~ >oii
c.t:: 'n',:g E
O:lc:.-
Qi_e._CD
6i:!2J::~=
"000-0
J::J:: ffi~-.!i
oJ::,.,...- f1) 0
c:j~CJIllO
cu ':':'CD~J::
0::"0 Q)J:: CD 0
C Q) - e. f1)
~IllUUl.Q-o
CD. Q) CD Q)
~ti~ii=>r:::
() 'I:: CUi :;::0 CD c:
_ CI) 0"0 cu
~ f1) c:__
CU'-CD_CUe.
Cl)CJ::oJ::_
CD-'I::-O
CDJ::~cnJ::
=-J2=e~6
GlJ:: Cf.l_ :J:'ii)
",j g.g ",'~
l!! Ul E.c:.5 ~
~ c: 0"0 e.
8QOiUlC:Gl
:-C:CDJ9J::
~CUiii=J::l'!-
~--Q)~
~&0~"'gJ2
()~~G)~~
,:gGl'ill,~al'E
-EQ)-J::~
10:1 o"fi 0"0
,t:UJE!~cuc:
1-!C.f1)~CUi
-...
I'-
.,;
.
>
CD
(I)
.~ .
...
(.)
<(
C)
Z
1=...1
ifi~
m~
~8
Ii
-~
>(3
. 0:: iii
~:t:
~...
W
(.)
W
~
o
w
(I)
o
l1.
o
0::
l1.
.
z
o
1=
..;
o
z
w
Ii
:&
o
(.)
w
0:: ...
(.) ...
o
Ii
C)
.
..
~
{l
l!!
is
~
!!!
.0
:::;
CD
~
.9
'"
e:
o
E-
O
-
e:
!!!
01
01
e:
.e:
o
~
CD
-
o
~
CD
=
..
E
CDC
.r::;0
:15
J!!"
CD ~
a::.e
~
u:i
Iii
W
ii2
~
III
::i
CD
-N
".-
E19
"'.-
.- D.
Cl3
15041
0_",
.r::; 01 :::l
"e:'
rn._ c
s::. -g"o
.~2'-
:I: ~
e: ~!!!
.2 !!!,e
e:.o-
:J~"6
~ 0 0
CD-.r::;
--"
~~l/)
:!l Ol~
~":I:
l/)CDCD
CD'!:'><
~~.!!!
'Iii
1:JSca
e:",W
.. e:
~,g~'E
c.> D..2" CD
, 0 c::: E
CD :::l CD
~l!!CDOl
_.2.J:c
.. ~ -;:; ~
FCDO"
.01
~
u:i
"
15 ~
.r::;
'" ~
l!! _
.r::;_ -0
-0_
.1!"E:s!
-,,:::l
000
-1XI.r::;
'" '"
e:CD<.>
.~=o
'S; ~:E
l!!.e Cl
CD~ CD
- .r::;
:e e>>-
~.5 ,g
8..!>! .><
" "
Ole:..
e:CD.o
.- 01 t:
:!~o
:::l0D.
~.... ~
.- ~
"0"
_UCD
0l!!'15
....- c:
~C CD .
.. ~.r::; (j!;
E..!-Ol
~ ~
~:eu)...-
-...J:!lCD
....CD_~
ois::.0.9
CD-2"
a::.9!-0
'"
u:i
"CD
e:-
m:e c
en en .-
:!l 8.2 g>
1i) .-
2.egg
!:"::::;:~
o iii Cl E
"E'g.1!8
".l!!-J!
~U)oo
,,->,
~o i "
!!! 'fii"E ~
.om~._
.- c; >
...J.r::; m
CD- "
.r::; ,...e '"
- ...CD....
}!!!!.o..
.0 CD
.- 0 >-
._ -oJ_
"CDt:'S<
.- ~ 8. CD
" e:
5~l!!.r::;
8.~..j .
~ je:(j!;
._" 0 Ol
o~ .--
CD~ ui'i...:
~ '" 9!.;2 ~
'lli~~'r!o
Fu'fi88
'"
u:i
1":1
c-s-
~
I
Oi
:::l
e:
e:
"oj
g>E
.- !!!
g.e
OD.
.'" '"
~c
<.>CD
CD E
~l!l
t:.!!!
0D.
D.l!!
E!-iil
- CD
"'"
,,!!!
e:0l
"D.
,,:::l
e:"
.ae:
0"
-01
CD,!:
~ ;:;
.- -
c'2
00
<.>E
~
,..,:
D::
~
l/)
G.1.5
Ol~ -
e:_ e:
.- 0 CD
'g",E
:::l _ D.
""e:o
>.CD1)
-E>
CD CD
E l!l" .
:em ftJ
-E-
~ ~.g5
"""0 en.!!
.ec:::~~
'2 m Us::.
o '" :g,<.>
E~.5 E
b!!!CDCD
CD -
'" ~~ :ll
.2:::l"~
S ~~e:
.~ =~ ~
:s~ili~
e:e:.95
8oE.!!!
~~.!.E
<.> .- '" <.>
"'>,
.1!.ll!"'E
-Q....Q)
'lli,,~'Iii
.<:e:iD..
t-CUcnCD
~
,..,:
E
..
.l!!
-
e:
.l!!
'5
'"
e:
8
CD
.r::;
-
"
e:
.a
"
e:
..
e:
]i
l!!
o
-
CD
:::l
e:
:;;
e:
o
<.>
'"
,..,:
0i0l
.- e:
".-
e:"E
.. ..
,s5:'
~ ..
5e:l!!
.- 0<
.2"0
,,"01
Q) ~.!I:!,...:..
-Q)co
o E e:::E
~ ~Ec?J~
S CD 0
.r::;l/)
CDcu--
~ D..5 U
c: 0 Q.'c
"m 'i)'- US
.. >.c._
l!!CDI!!C
"CD_
.9 0.0 e:
_ECD
~ J!l ~ E
e:e: l8,
:;;.. ..
8"" Ole:
:J.e: m
",0_
~ 5< g>~
<.>lSOCD
-cnm
~j~~
- 01;)
~~~~
'"
,..,:
~ CD
o.r::;
:0-
e:.9
...><
- "
~1l
<.>
CDt:
.r::;8.
;'l!!
.o~
e:.e
.2 C/)
'llii!:
:::l 0
~~
GJ.Q
i:g
~D..
.--
cO
86
o}!
~ .-
~c
..CD
E~
~.s
:: l1'o
J!!CD5
CD.r::; 0
0:::150
'"
,..,:
I
It)
I
~
=CD
.- .r::;
.0_
'ih~
0- CD
D."-
e: ..
CD"~
.r::;
~).~ ~
:5=5-
.. >,"
.2m-
.. 1XI "
> 2
CD.r::;_
-'"
CD:::l e:
:::l 0 8
e: l/) .
'- >,
--"Cm
COcm
8e:".r::;
.8:8 &'5
aJ.- 0
i.5 !Ill/)
u.o-oCD
l!! e .~
'68~.5
CD....-
.o..cC:
lI::.l!!"'.!!!
.l!!!!!.9D.
",5 e:
,.... C.2
".-::E -
ui1~~
-<'>CC"
"~C~
F.el/)~
'"
,..,:
~
f/)
z
o
i=
o
<(
(!)
z
!i::!
wO
:ez
w;:)
..,JO
0..0
!~
~o
O::w
~x
f/)'"
w
o
w
z
-
o
w
f/)
o
a..
o
0::
a..
I
I
Z
o
i=
<(
o
z
w
:e
:e
o
o
w
0::
o
o
:e
C)
I
1ii
.280
:0"0-;;
::> C '"
a.",
Ol_U
J:rlQ
....- ::E
.9,EC!)
Ollil""
c_c
.~.... <<J
:!:'.e=
C u
o . C
C ::>
E.20
J:.!II U
(,).2: Q)
::>OJ:
Ul _
OlOlO
c:.5 -
.- "-.}t;
J:Olu
~~ns
.c ._ .c
'" Ol_
1i)c....
Q) W 0 .
o.Ol
- ~ QJ c:
01: .... .-
r... OJ..c E
Q.1 E""-
;a 1:: 'j:;
E'" . C
o.Ul'"
Ol Ol C
J: 0 .2 ~
- _:.::
f/) m'-
ffit:~:Q
_ ",Ul
Ol g > '"
Ct:>Q)J!:!
~
cO
Iii
C!I
0(
Z
~
o
E ~.s
B ~Q)
wE....;='
~~Oc:"'O
-~~"C
~1no._Q)
'C ,- E 0 g
OX -
;t::: Q) 0 en .!!!
c: --....
oU)"'O~~
E~ffi~~
n:I::J _ c:
- m .- c:
o.o_uQ)
~-;5~~
ij;:iI ""l6 ~
"C 03 Q.cu
_G:"e ..c
iQ)U1ii~
Eg'ElI!.8
1:: .5 Q) 0
~~ cn;.5
Q)"C!!~CIJ
.0---(0)
c: 0- en
tn~-CDCO
.5::> It) E l!!
ffiuomg~
Ol _ "i' Ul._ Ol
.~~=Q):>'E
DJ::..o..ct:c.
c::__ -mo
W~1iiEaia;
Ol..meE>
= r::: -.-.!!
Q) en -.....
-"omen....
"'.- Ol:iI Ol:iI
.c:o=-:o>GJ
I--_u.q::oc:
l!!
ijl~~
>--
o cOl _
~ :=
&::2 'i
('0.9-0
~ ~ ~
J:c<=
"0:.;::;,0
CC-
"'.8 {j
U;=GJ
= 'i "5'
~ll:: 0.
't: n:J_
.2 (/)- '"
~ C
0. 0
Q)u):2
J:o""
;; .9!. -g
Ol e
~o.g>
o cu'l::
""J:.c
C_""
Ol - C
>.0",
enNui
::> ~O Ol
,Q.... u.!!i
lii C) 5 m
.... c: 0 U)
0.'5 Ul &.
== c: en e
g.a.s:D.
5Q:"g!:!:
Utl.2tl
N
cO
~ E
't: ~
.2 E_
~ Ol ~
c.1i) 0
It)Ol-
'f"""~g>
g-.5 is
- C
GJJ9.2
J: C
-OlOl
Ol E.5
~Ol-
O >.!!!
"Ceo..
Olc 0. 0
EO.
"0'- Q.
C Ol '"
'" Ol....,
-"'''
o.c-
~'~ ~
",""-
-""i!:
.- Q) 0 .
g"":iI.!!!
::>$ ,g
,q.c:-g~
~-"'&.
~o _
" 1;) 19 en
-=cnCU
Q)cn>c:
='0_0
_Q)~o
(U.0':sU)
..c.....s:::cn
I- 0. tl '"
N
cO
Ul
-t':
~
.2
:c
::>
a.
Ol
J:
-
o
- .
_C
Ul 0
='Ci)
"':ii
J:O
u
::>Ol
Ul C
_'i::
o Ol
Ol
-c
C,_
OlOl
E C
o.W
o .
--
Ol C
> Ol
Ol E
""t
~ '"
~o.
Ol Ol
ll:0
'"
cO
Ol_
C C
co"'ffi '2 Q)
;'ffi E
e c: E Q)
'" Ol >
c.o~~
e 0.0 c..
0.- (0 E
o _
.9 r::: >--
"C ,2 ~ ~
G)-me.
orlE'"
~!E'><()
;:;Ee~
m-8e:.a
.Q'-ca,2
_-'=0)....
c:~.&::o
CD!:_......
~ Ol Olijl iii.
llccUl5
00_._
-E--
~ "'. '" ~ l'!Ol
1iiE
Ol= ,9:2
C e Ul
'I:: ~- ui 6
$ '5 ",1'l u
C'COla;~
.- Q. U '~a..
Ol ~n_
C:-:la.u
wc:::o _
Ol~UlijlE
:5 g ~!E e
m~:Cc:~
J:::>COl~
I-Ul.2:2a.
'"
cO
t:!.-~
""
C
Ol'"
c_
'2 'u
C C
'" ::>
- 0
a.U
""Ol
cJ:
"'-
~.s
~-"
~l;l
u.c
=t
.g&.
a. l!!
fi""
C C
'" '"
C C
U::.2
-
Ol '"
J: ::>
~m
-ij;
~ ~
~,g
'" Ul
E-
C
Ul Ol
:;: E '
-ttl
~"'Q
~o.
OlOl:!:
ll:0C>
.-,
~
ceil cO
~
c;
,
CO
,
.........
.:.i
0(
U
Ul
u:
~
'"
--Ol
00>'
.s=cf'j
g.Q It)
Ol ~.Ul
.....--
no C
~~Ol
o.E
ijl~t
s:: '" '"
t:Olo.
O'r'Ol
'!:1t)0
Ol",Ol
0. C
en Q).-
t""c
::> C
~u.!!!
C11.E;:Q.
Ol 0 Ol
-UlJ:
"'--
R"'c
::J.s 0
lijlal
'-"CI f/)
> C '"
l!!",.c
- ~ ui...J
CU Q) Q) en
::> - '"
C Ol - U
C.o c: Q)
C'O ~....
Ol .Ul l!! .e
:6!:!:'UlJ:
_O""j:
~Ol$e
t-:5cC'J
'"'"'"
01 ~
en ai
.
>
m
(/)
z
o.
i= ...
~ ....
.0...
2E. .....
l-....
-.':>2::::...
wU
:lEZ
...wS
....
""'0.-- '<_
:IE .
:->
~5
ceW
(/)%
(/) l-.
w.
(.) .
w
l:
Q
w
(/)
o
a..
o
a:
a..
.
Z
o
i=
~
Z .
w
:IE
:IE .
o
fd. ...
a:
g
:IE
C!)
.
"0
r:::
'" .
~U
~~
0"0
8fij
c=
",0
r::: r:::
.- ::l
u..o
GlU
:5Gl
o~
--
~.9
8.-><
I!!lti
",.0
~lll
Or:::
iil8.
.... en
o I!!
r::: ~
.2.e
~~
'" Gl
o.Ol
I!! III
c.'"
~~
~~
Gl._
D::U
N
m
~
8.
-
C:
o
U
....I
~
Ul
ii:
~I
N
m
"0
.wI!!
r:::._
Gl"O
E"O .
~r:::U
~C'CIO
Gl .~
c;te>
en"'Gl
~~~
o '-~-
~.8.9
,,0"0
"" 8- Gl
.0 -
::l r:::
a.. >- ~
Gl .0 I!!
~r:::o.
-0
0'- Q)
-G)"c
>.c.cn
"gEg'
1ii8'5
Q)'-~
~.e
- en
-c:t::
00.
._ "0
c.~ c:
o > '"
+:Jc~
~
"'0l8.
o.r:::Gl
Q)'c I,,;.
5.31Gl
'-c;
~.-
CD ~1ij
c::::w-5
~
o
~
U
ii:
~
Gl
1::"0 -= ....
8.. B ..... m
1!!.~o;31 ~
Gl ~.5 E X :S!
~o."OOGlGl 0
-_C:-.oc:o.c
co.2cn .....~
.- C/) ..... "C (.) VI ...
"CE~5j'30c=
.!!........ E~::e.Q (J
gB"OQ)CI)c)"5E
en.5 fij 2:!~~~
6>'>;~:J--.&::
~~1i,5 !.s~j
NcnCG-c -ci
o,-~Q)Q)Q)_~
;;;.e~"5!~:S!8.r:::
__CD f; ca
CD c: ..... c: . c; a= .
:5 GlE 3l.... ~~ 0..5 EO. E
... bO CD'g CD
~1iier::: .ou8-
I!! 5!"E.Q 0l.9.5"O g>
=cJ!lgal~"O~.Q
o en~""8.r:::
5 t:D>'U5 u <<J.5 CD
o c: rn c.!!.! ~c=
u'r::: -8 [",:i8 G;
s.! ~-g'O.5~J!l ~
g>.2 '" en "0 .~ en
~ W g C)"C.!Y ;U en "E
_0) cc):!.cc:cu
1ii:5~'lli ~~{l ~~
.=.sg-a~Q)Q.~Ci5
~I
~
o
~
C.-7
en
~
'"
0..
Gl
~
-
'0
~
'"
0.
en
'"
al
"0
::l
U
r::: .
.- ~
Gl~
~Gl
=.)J!
~ ~
0
"E~
"'~
"00..
r:::-
",0..
'0;
:S!.!!!
00..
~
en r:::
I!!.Q
~-
-.l!l
"Or:::
Gl Gl
.!!.! E
> Gl
I!!"Q.
<(E
~ ,
~ I"-
- ,
'0
Xl
r::: ~
0"0
ifij
1ii
~m
"0:5
r:::O
",.0
en -
~~
"'.-
o..~
Gl~
~.-
-u
Z "02:-
0 Co.
; ~g.
'" 0
--
(.) 'g "E
II! ::l'"
0"0
ur:::
c ~.l!l
z ._ en
<( U"O
~ Gl-
~2
- en .
D:: m!~
:: ~~~
::1 ~
-
-
l.'"
./1'<;>
>-
m
tn
z
o
j;
(.)
ct
o
z
i=..J
z-
w(.)
:ez
. W::)
...10
0..(,)
i!!~
~o
~~'
tnl-
W
(.)
W
Z
o
W
tn
o
0..
o
IX
0..
I
I
I/)
g'E=
.;: e! .s
::J cHI)
"Ce
e:a.'
o .l!l
.- .::;(. c:
1U~Q,)
~OE
ll;=t:
GlGl..
~.c: a.
a.- Gl
U).E 0
9:'01::
a.. CD.Q
QJ '2'10
;; a.!
2;>0
~ 'e: ~
> 0
Q'c::"C
ac..c:
a.....
"1/)1/)
,.,..~
"C ...
mi.no..~
__Cl"OO
"'ffi~c:~
cn9>nJ-o
.. "C '" lil
.s=. C:.f: C
:: m c: CD
g ~ Iii E
5.,0:: E
(.)"'Gl8
9'.c:
Gllt-I/)
.c: _..
I- o.c:
"!
~
~
~
i:
o
!:
z
o
i=
IlS
0::
U
W
0::
C
Z
C
Ul
:.::
0::
c
IL
Gl ..
=.~ "'C
-o..e:
0_ ..
e:0..1/)
.2 Gl ~
-.c:..
..!:!-o..
a.-
E""C
0= c: -
U .. "C
~ OJ ffi
.!!::lC:
.- f/)'- L-
"C c: c: m
l!iGlliiGl
>< "C - >-
Gle:o..x
oalG>Q)
... _.s=. c
:m[i5~
1/)0.. _
~I/)~
-r;e:E.e
ill....
~ - ~
.- 0.. ~I/)
"C -
e:
=6C.G.l
g.- E
:l1U~t::
a-om
u5i;=g.
,.,EGlO
~Q).s=.
o--c:
a.e:o
Gl E.- ""
.c:- ..
::~~l!:'
2...glil
I- 0.. a.0::
"C -<i
e: a>
"Cca...m
_Bt:.e--
o.!!! 0 _
~! c..~ cv
Gl~l!:'...o
EGl..=E
.c: "Gl
~omia€i
~-g;C1):.r
Q)n:J"C.c....
"C .Gl"C~
Q):Bm'S,g
"0.- c.. 0 u
,,~'0;=0
E'G~"C r:::
>..12 co ~ .-
~c:>."'Cr:::
~~~ffi~
mmmU51!!
cn"'Q)"C~
"lilao';;;
.s=..... .cc
E ....!l! rJ) 0
m.E:::~o
6>~ .=:0
~.9 ~"C c:
0.0.;:Q)::5
~J!!.g.~8
~ {j' c.. ~ 'C
.:> l:: m c:
0.. Gl . ~ ..
o::iij f! 1/)(.)
.2: ~ &.0
Gl::J..o:;
~ lif Eat!)
~
~
~
I/) Gl
'en:; ~
"e:-
00'- c:
co c:'-
Ee~
......co
.e 0.."'C
::J
=...."0
;= e: Gl
Gl ::J
.c: E.5
.Q Q) C
.c:08
;= ..
0.. a."C
- L..'o
a...e>
Gl "C ..
.c:Glo
i5lJe"E
f/)'!:: I! m
_"C "C
e: Gl 2' e:
CD.o~l!!
e: a. I/)
8.~~~
E"C 0 I/)
~ e: ;=.-
.. >
-"'C!
::J I/) Gl
I/) ~ e: ..
0-
!!!I/)""O
0':; c: c:
.J:CDQ,)O
-'-E;
-cu!c.
ca '- 0 0
~.Ema1
'"
~
~
"C -
c: 0 ~
m-m-:
I/) . >0'0
-'" I/) e:
--';;;CU)::l
co..,.... 0
0.. w.- (.)
E e:
.r:. 1:::'- >.
:!::::mc.c
;= a... ;=
c: Q) C[ cu
00 .-
.- ... >
-"CGlGl
mQ)_'"
""-r;I/)~
~~~.e
Om-Lri'
0...160>
c Q)..c-,
'-.c: e:.,.
-Gla>
...00)-
e:"C ~ >
Gle:t!)LL
E .. Gl ~
t: .c:o
CtI~_~
c..-c _ _
(1)oOm
0;:: e: &
~.~~ e
'2::iS ~ c..
e: ::J ..
.!l! 0.. g. E
a.. _... m
msc-en
.1::.;::; Q) 0
... co.~ Q.
o!:t:~
CD (.) 0 ....
.!:: CD'- 0
00:: a;=
"":
~
~
,.,
QiGl
I/).c:
0_
0'15
"CGl
e: I/)
.. ::J
5i E ui
-"'::JGl
.. E I/)
t:._ Q
CDa~
"g0::::J
::Jl!:'a.
Gl ::J e:
.c UJ.2
I:l:cu
.. Gl Gl
-o~
o..-lil
~ 0.. ~
Gl_
7na..-g
.. Gl ..
:;=~
"".c:..
~ "" a.
e: ;= ~
$"C.e
~Gl_
C)mGi
('CJ.5: .g
"C
cu....G,)
~8~
":
~
~
c.-p
iij
.5
I/)
Gl
::J
I/)
.!!1
-
]lui
e:t:
$8.
~ Gl
t!)~
1/)=
1/)"
!7n
"C"C
"Ce:
.. ..
.2:-1/)
-e:
.20
o~
-..
::J
Gl-
::J ~
.5: G,)
Co
o Gl
U._
o e
-a.
=Gl
.l!!-
1/).0
-rl
0._
!"5.
.- c-
0..
10
~
~
_ "C
-I/)e:
~m(t1
e:1/)1O
$ 8. 0
~o"l'
t!)~-
a.e:
~ - Gl
Gl 0 Gl
:2Gl",
UJ'-~
e: e Gl
o a..o
o_~
,.,e:o
=CD"C
.2 ~'E
000
_ 0
= "'.,.
('CJ.S: ll)
7n~a::
-r;.!!1(/)
ill > Gl
~l!:'.c:
.- -
"Ceo
liCD-
I:f!!"t:
5 ::J fl
(.)8..
2;>Gl'O
._ s:. (t1
(.)-"C
Q).55i
.c:
-I/)e:
_ CD._
(t1::::Js:. .
,c:1/)""1O
t-.!!! ~..!.
~
~
~
0.:
0::
Gl
.c:
-
'0
t:
..
a.
I/)
III
"C
III
I/)
l!:'
"C
"C
..
Gl
.0
.~
Gl
::J
I/)
.!!1
I/)
:E
I-
~
~
~
o
-
..
1il
~>
.c:.!l!
.2.E
j(.)
E E
l!!.l!!
",I/)
e~
a.
e:
J! .~
ts~
, .. 0
a.2
.s 1il
e:
e: 0
.. 0
.!!"t:
"Gl
l!:' E
Ut:
:!:!R.
::J .. I/)
~~J!
2;>e:i!:
.- CD ('CJ
U.: c..
~ jT.~
t-~c..
~
~
~
0.:
0::
Gl
.c:
-
'0
t::
..
a.
I/)
..
"C
III
I/)
l!:'
"C
"C
..
Gl
.0
.~
Gl
::J
I/)
.!!1
I/)
~
":
~
~
I/)
Gl
~~
'0
"CJ!!
:; e:
~.Q
1/)-
..
Be:!
I/) U
5~
..Gl
--
::J ..
t5 .f:
a.
E-
Gl 0
--
I/) e:
~ 5
e: E
.- ..
1/)_
&llll~
.- (t1 CD
e Gl E
a."C a.
""--'- 0
~>-
=eGl
E a. ili
~o"C
2-G,)
::J"2.c:
El!!-
._ e:
;=::J:E
Gl lif ""
z~;=
":
~
~
0.:
0::
Gl
.c:
-
-
o
t:
..
a.
I/)
..
"C
Gl
I/)
I/)
l!:'
"C
"C
..
~
.~
Gl
::J
I/)
.!!1
I/)
:E
I-
~
~
~
..
0:;
_.c:
Gl(.)
~ E
:6:l.S:!
e: I/)
8 ~
:l2e:
::J'-
O.
.c: -I/)
1/)-'"
~
-..
e:a.
CD...!.
E.5
t: E
...
a.-
Gl'O
o
I/)
e: I/)
o Gl
:;::; c:
.. Gl
!1U
lil '5-
o::e
"Ca.
e:a.
....
I/)Gl
-",.c:
~-
"I/)
0.. I/) .
CDQ)!!J
.c. ~.~
1-..>
~
~
~
-....
,
co
,
--...
~I
"!
~
~
~
I
~
ii.
""'"'
.
ATTACHMENT A
.
.
.
.
.
.
"
L".'. ,"II, !"". "[1 !":o;;-rn"'"
.\ ': .' ."~ ~_~ C,: [;::r,")-
;;.'~~,:" '.i.iV ~ U~
f I\!r.\.~""'''''''''''''' ,... "
l.~j~i2;.~~h1. ~::"\'ot~1~~~~_ -11, _ .\~
~ti 'W.~'U iil1 1ill.~';;.:...--..:d:..:::I
MINUTES OF A SPECIAL JOINT MEETING OF THE CHULA VISTA
GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION AND
PLANNING COMMISSION
5:55 p.m.
Wednesdav. May II. 1994
Conference Rooms 2/3
Public Services Building
276 Fourth Avenue. Chula Vista
ROLL CALL
PLANNING COMMISSION
PRESENT: Chair Martin, Commissioners Fuller, Moot, Salas, and Tarantino
ABSENT: Commissioner Tuchscher
GROWTH MANAGEMENT OVERSIGHT COMMISSION
PRESENT: Chair Hubbard, Commissioners Armbrust, Dull, Peter, Allen,
Langius, Martin
ABSENT:
Commissioners Hyde and Kell
STAFF PRESENT:
Planning Director Leiter, Assistant Planning Director Lee,
Principal Planner Bazzel, Associate Planner Batchelder,
Assistant City Attorney Rudolf, Civil Engineer Ouadah
MOTIONS TO EXCUSE
MSUC to excuse Commissioners Will Hyde (vacation) and Jim KeD (business)
MSUC to excuse Commissioner Tuchscher who was out or town on business.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES - MSUC to approve the Growth Management Oversight
Commi!l.~ion minutes or April 4, 1994 and April 28, 1994.
Members of the Commissions and staff were introduced.
GMOC Chair Hubbard presented an overview of the 1993 GMOC report and recommendations.
There were seven thresholds in compliance, two out of compliance, and two for which
Statements of Concern to affected agencies were recommended. While for the first time, schools
were found in compliance for short-term growth, there were sti11long-range concerns regarding
schools. The library threshold would be adequately met with the completion of the South Chula
Vista Library. There were concerns regarding wastewater and sewage. Regarding drainage,
.
Planning Commission!
GMOC Special Meeting
-2-
May 11, 1994
---
the GMOC identified 80 needed but unfunded projects in western Chula Vista. They were
concerned about completion of those projects and made a recommendation regarding completion
of those projects in a timely manner.
Regarding traffic, the thresholds had been met, but there were concerns over five locations noted
in the report, and particularly "H" Street. They were suggesting that staff come back with a
more detailed report.
The threshold had been met regarding fiscal compliance. There were concerns regarding
continued dependence on one-time monies to balance the budget. The GMOC was concerned
about the effect on services if monies were not forthcoming, and in light of continued recession.
The parks and recreation threshold had been met, but the thresholds only focused on parks in
the eastern territories; the western area needed to be part of the thresholds.
Chair Hubbard noted that police, fire, water, and air quality were not in compliance. They
recommended that the City Council consider directing the various departments to revise all of
those but the water threshold, and perhaps establish new thresholds.
A major recommendation of the GMOC was that the City support the Fire and Police
Department request for a new computer aided dispatch and records management system. .......
Regarding water, the City and water districts continue to work cooperatively through the
Interagency Water Task Force. The area continues to be dependent on water from Northern
California and Colorado. The GMOC believes the water agencies should attempt to develop
alternate resources to reduce dependence on imported supply, and maintain water service levels
required for industry, and current and anticipated population.
Mr. Hubbard stated that it was difficult to ascertain whether the air quality threshold was in
compliance, because of the standard's present structure, and that air quality is a regional issue.
The GMOC was requesting that this threshold be reviewed.
At this time, Chairman Hubbard opened up the meeting for questions on each of the thresholds
individually.
Police
There was discussion regarding the CAD/RMS system. The GMOC believed this system would
benefit response time, since fire and police personnel could have access to the system while en
route. Information regarding an incident in process would already be in the system and would
automatically come up on the screen. With the improved technology, there would be more
efficient use of police resources.
.......
Fire - No comments, other than the CAD system would help the firemen, also.
.
Planning Commission!
GMOC Special Meeting
Water
-3-
May 11, 1994
It was noted that one of the water companies had dropped from their billings the information as
to whether a residence had met its goal regarding saving water. The response was that the water
company felt it was a matter of complacency and that it would be better to bring it back to focus
when the drought was at its highest point rather than each month. The Otay Water District
representative replied that their company was not printing it on the bills because they believed
people would get used to seeing it, and it would be overlooked during a drought.
The possibility of desalination was discussed. SDG&E had considered a plant on the bayfront;
however, it had been determined that the cost of taking care of the waste was too great to
continue with that project. They would have to put a pipeline out to the ocean, and the cost of
implementing the desalination was not practical. The water companies would look at
desalination anytime it became feasible.
Regarding conservation or storage, it was not felt that this would work in the long term if there
were a severe drought. It was noted that Sweetwater Authority was exploring brackish ground
water extraction.
.
It was brought out that the section in the report regarding reclaimed water indicated that
reclaimed water seemed to be on hold. It was recommended that through the Interagency Water
Task Force and the County Water Authority, that efforts be made to use reclaimed water.
Air Oualitv
Planning Director Leiter, referring to page 19 of the GMOC report, said that looking at a new
threshold policy showed merit. He had been working with SANDAG and the County on
regional growth management strategy, and they prepared a report every year regarding regional
standards. He suggested that they start with regional growth management standards and focus
on what the City was doing to meet regional standards rather than separate City standards.
There was a question regarding traffic signals and whether the time spent sitting idle created
more air pollution than continuous flow. It was noted that hot spots had been studied.
Schools
Discussion ensued regarding year-round school and the lack of support for it. Chair Hubbard
stated that the schools indicated that State funding for school house construction may no longer
depend on schools going on a year-round schedule. There was a strong indication that it would
not be imperative that year-round schools be pushed on the public.
. Libraries
It was believed that 'the future of libraries would rely heavily on telecommunication. The
GMOC felt strongly that the City Council should direct the Library Board to review the
Planning Commission!
GMOC Special Meeting
-4-
May 11, 1994
"'-
thresholds, since it was now based on square footage. Telecommunications would bring multi-
media information directly into the homes.
There was discussion regarding the information highway system and whether there had been any
contact with the City of San Diego regarding linking up with them. It was noted that the main
library used the internet system, which was mainly news oriented.
Sewera2e
It was questioned whether there was a penalty for the City not joining the San Diego Area
Wastewater Management District (SDA WMD) by June 30. The reply was that the City already
had a contract, and there would be no ramifications to contractual agencies. However, they
would no longer have future reserve capacity. The penalty had to do with commitments to the
SDAWMD's bonding. After June 30, an agency which had not withdrawn would be obligated
for the bonding costs.
Draina2e - No questions or comments.
Fiscal
The Civil Engineer commented on Phase II of the Montgomery improvement. He stated that "'-
the Americans With Disabilities Act was delaying improvements.
Traffic
Chair Hubbard stated that it was obvious that there were serious concerns, especially on "H"
Street. There was discussion as to when a moratorium would kick in, and it was noted that the
GMOC would determine failure of the threshold standard, at which time the Council would
determine whether there would be a moratorium and the impact. The GMOC was asking for
more definitive information from the Engineering Department to determine that for next year's
report.
Commissioner Moot asked if that would go through the Planning Commission or directly to the
City Council through the GMOC.
Planning Director Leiter replied that it would go directly to the City Council, who may ask
Planning for more information. Commissioner Moot stated that he would like to hear the data
as soon as it had been ascertained.
Commissioner Fuller stated that the purpose of the formation of the threshold was to determine
that. It was incumbent on the GMOC, if a threshold was being abused, to make an issue very
strongly with the City Council.
"""'"
There was discussion on the way the cycles of traffic were measured, and whether or not the
thresholds were appropriate. Civil Engineer Ouadah noted the method used for measurement
.
.
.
Planning Commission!
GMOC Special Meeting
-5-
May 11, 1994
of traffic was state-of-the-art. Commissioner Ray felt the method of measurement was not
necessarily reflective of the motorists' perceptions.
Parks & Recreation
Chair Hubbard suggested that the City Council strongly consider amending this threshold. The
GMOC would like to see the City develop the greenbelt master plan. It was noted by one of
the other GMOC Commissioners that it was not a unanimous decision to amend this threshold.
Discussion ensued regarding the use of mini parks in Western Chula Vista, since the area is
relatively built out--how and where land would be acquired, and where the mini parks would be
built. It was indicated that the space would not have to be large, could consist of only a basket
ball court or hand ball court, etc. There was a suggestion that there could be a possible
partnership with schools to open up school grounds and put parks and recreation resources in
the school system.
Associate Planner Batchelder indicated that the Planning and Parks and Recreation Departments
are working on a needs assessment and a Parks Implementation Plan which would address these
and other issues. It would take 18 months to complete.
Commissioner Salas felt the inability to upgrade the recreational facilities in the western area
exacerbated the gang problems, because there was not enough recreational space. Commissioner
Tarantino asked if there had been any discussion regarding bringing in Southwestern College in
joint use agreement. Commissioner Ray believed Southwestern was already open for public use
during the weekend.
Chair Martin noted that the east/west separation was clearly pointed out regarding acreage. It
had to change. There was a need to bring the acreage closer.
MSUC (Moot/Fuller) to accept the GMOC report.
It was noted that the City Council would consider the GMOC report on May 26, 1994, at 4:00
p.m.
The meeting was adjourned at 6:58 p.m.
~~
Nancy ~ley, ~
Planning Commission
(Jmoc-pc.min)
.
ATTACHMENT B
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT C
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT D
.
.
'.
APPENDIX A
.
.
'.
APPENDIX B
.
.
..
APPENDIX C
.
.
.
APPENDIX D
.
.
.~
.~
. ..,
. PIlIMI..1IIIICJ
COUITT OF IAI OlllO
Air Pollution Conrrol Board
Brian P. Bilbray District I
Dianne Jacob District 2
Pamela Slater District 3
Leon L. Williams District 4
John MacDonald District 5
Air Pollution Conrrol Officer
R. J. Sommerville
... .,<
. .
February 16. 1994
,
Ed Batchelder
Associate Planner
Planning Department
City of Chula Vista
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista. CA 91910
GMOC MEETING. MARCH 3
.
Enclosed are the following documents for the GMOC meeting on March 3.
List of major sources located in Chula Vista. and the types and amounts of
pollutants emitted by these sources.
Computer printout of all commercial and industrial sources in Chula Vista.
Two computer printouts of facilities in Chula Vista subject to District action in
1993. One printout lists facilities issued Notices of Violation. The other lists
facilities issued Notices to Comply for minor infractions.
1992 Annual Report on air quality. (1993 Scorecard on air quality will be
provided at the meeting.)
1993 Annual Progress Report on the Regional Air Quality Strategy.
State lowers smog designation for the San Diego region. Federal EPA
requested to do the same under the Federal Clean Air Act.
Employer Trip Reduction Regulation XllI advisory.
List of District Rules and Regulations.
A copy of the current issue of Air News on recent District activities.
$8.8 million allocation by the District Board for local programs to reduce
automobile trips and emissions, including $269. 000 for the City of Chula
Vista. (see Air News for a summary.)
AB 2008 (Alpert). Statutes of 1993, subjects Mexican vehicles commuting to
the San Diego area to the California Smog Check program.
.
D-\
9150 Chesapeake Drive. San Diego . California 92123-1096. (619) 694-3307
FAX (619) 694-2730 . Smoking Vehicle Hotline 1-800-28-SMOKE
.
.
.
Ed Batchelder
Associate Planner
Planning Deplll'tIDCnt
City of Chula Vista
2
February 16, 1994
Regarding the City's Air Quality Threshold Standard, I will be happy to meet with you
and SANDAG staff to discuss possible revisions to the Standard. -AS the District pointed
out in prior years, SANDAG is the agency that coordinates devel~nt forecasts with
local jurisdictions and provides regional growth forecasts to the District for air quality
planning. SANDAG is also responsible for developing regional Growth Management
Strategy and conducting transportation conformity. Accordingly, SANDAG should be
consulted in evaluating potential revisions to the Threshold Standard.
If you have any questions regarding these or other air quality matters, feel free to call me
Jt 94-3303.
.~
H.PAULSIDHU
Deputy Director
HPS:ndi
Enclosure
"0.2
'.
Air PoUution Control Board
Brian P. Bilbray Dimi" 1
Dianne Jacob Dimi" 2
Pamela Slater District 3
Leon l. Williams District 4
John MacDonald District 5
Air PoUution Control Officer
R. J. Sommerville
~
~
. ..A. -,
...... ,,11Im
cu." If ... IIIID
1993 SCORECARD: FIVE STRAIGHT \'EARS
OF IMPROVED AIR QUALITY
Contact: Bob Goggin
(619) 69t 3332
For the fifth straight year, San Diego County's air quality oontinued to improve in
1993.
Smog exceeded the state clean air standard only 90 days in 1993 oompared to 97 days
in 1992, 106 in 1991, 139 in 1990, and 158 in 1989.
In 1993, San Diego exceeded the federal standard 14 days oompared to 19 days in
1992, 22 in 1991, 39 in 1990, and S9 in 1989.
"San Diego County's continued improvement in air quality clearly demonstrates
. 'that air pollution control measures on industry and automobiles are working," said Pam
Slater, chairwoman of the Air Pollution Control Board.
The average car on the road today is eight years old and much less polluting than
older vehicles. Since 1983, all cars oome with three-way catalytic oonverters. Older
catalytic models only reduced hydrocarbon and carbon monoxide emissions. The three-
way units also reduce the nitrogen dioxide emissions which oontribute to smog
formation.
All new cars are also fueI~injected and have on-board oomputers that continously
monitor and adjust air to fuel mixtures to reduce pollution. Motor vehicles account for
about 60 percent 01 San Diego's smog~forming emissions.
EI Nino - the warmer water temperatures in the Pacific Ocean that affect weather
patterns - and the lingering dust clouds &om the 1991 Mt. Pinatubo volcano eruption
seemed to have less impact on Ur quality in 1993 than in the previous two years.
.
-more-
t)-3
9150 Chesapeake Drive. San Diego · California 92123-1096. (619) 694-3307
FAX (619) 694-2730 · Smoking Vehicle Hodine 1-800-28-SMOKE
S...............tco.....L.JI'.'
.
.
.
APCD 1993 SCORECAIlD
2-2-2
Clean air standards are set by the state and federal governments to provide an
adequate margin of safety in protecting public health. California's standards are sbicter
than those used nationwide. The state standard is 9 parts per hundrecllllillion (pphm) or
75 on the Pollutant Standards Index (PSI). The federal standard is 12 pphm or 100 PSI.
A refined analysis of the SOura! of San Diego's air pollution showed that smog
transported from Los Angeles was the key factor in 13 of the 14 days when air quality
violated federal standards. Of the 90 days when state standards were exceeded, 51 days (57
percent) were caused primarily by transport from Los Angeles and 39 days (43 percent)
were from locally-generated pollution.
A detailed study analyzed specific days when air quality and transport patterns
were intensively monitored using airaaft and ground sites. The study determined that
winds above the ocean surface and aloft transported more polluted air from the Los
Angeles air basin than had previously been thought.
This new data was provided to the Environmental Protection Agency (EP A) for its
review of the Disbict's request for a reclassification from "severe" to "serious" for ozone
(photochemical smog).
Five health advisory episodes were issued in the County last year. A health
advisory is issued when smog levels reach 15 parts per hundred mWion (138 'PSI) and the
Q)JNI\unity is advised to reduce vigorous outdoor activity.
San Diego did not have a Stage 1 smog episode in 1993. A Stage 1 episode occurs
when smog levels reach 200 PSI or 20 pphm.
This was the third straight year that San Diego County did not exceed the state
standard for carbon monoxide. State standards were also met for nitrogen dioxide, sulfur
dioxide, and lead; but not for ozone (smog) or inha1able particulates.
-more-
D-Lf
.. APCD 1993 SCORECARD
3-3-3
With the exception of ozone, San Diego met federll air quality Itanclarda for all
criteria pollutants: carbon monoxide, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, inhalable
particulates, and lead.
,..
96-5 (3/'12/94)
.
.
D-5
'.
~
~ ~I
li ]i
~ Jj
'C I Ii
ca ,~
~ & f':'
-.= If
AI1D =' 8
~:a ..i
(f} ~ j~
- < t-a
!f <j
~.i)
is t!
fa !J
~ j;
.
~ Q .. '" .. '" .. Sl ... Q :: .. '" Q
..
~
~ . .. ... '" ... ... .. ... .. '" It III .. Q
.. ..
i ... '" ... ... III '" '" .. ... ~ III = ..
..
~
I ... .. '" III '" '" lEI III ... II :3 lEI ...
...
~
I '" III ... '" '" ... III on III .. ... ...
.. .. ..
! ... ... '" ... ... .. ~ III , :3 R ...
! .. ... .. ... on ... lQ ... . .. lEI ..
.. ..
J ... Q '" ... ... ... ... '" = ... ~ Q
.. .. ... ..
~
I on on ... ... .. .. ~ '" I .. ~ ..
.. .. .. ... ...
~
I '" '" III .. '" .. ~ '" Ii: '" R ..
.. .. -
~
i on , , III '" ... ~ '" :: ~ s;:; ..
- ... . .'
~
! ... ... . :: .. on R ... ~ =s ~ ..
- -
! - :Q !: 12 '" '" Gl !:l Ie III I ...
J t J I j , I II J I 1
~ ! II !
f I i! J ! I ! ~I ] ...
iii j J
!!
D-~
~
J
I
f.
~
.Ii
:i
is
.8
1
J t
tJ t
ill
Iii!
I . _ I
'.
.
~ II') to. o. '" II') N ~ l:! c I l'l ... c II')
... ... ... ... ... II')
i: .. N .. IQ II') .. ... ~ '" S: ~ !i c '"
... ... ... ... .. ...
...
i l:! ... III f::l lQ ::l ~ ;;; III ! III ~ ... '"
...
...
! ell :!: l:! ell ~ ... l:! ~ ~ !S li la ...
N ...
I I:l ... .... !i ... ... ~ III !! ~ ~ ...
N C':') ." ." ...
...
I o. I:l Ii! l'l ~ to. ~ ~ ! Ii! ~ ...
... ...
...
to. IS a
~ .. l!l f::l f::l I:l =:l ~ ~ !ill ...
... ...
! N ... ~ N f::l ~ S! lR a ~ tl c
... ... ...
i l:! :ll !ill ~ !ill III III !ill ! s ~ ..
... ...
I .... ell ... t:; '" .. l!l li ! ~ ~ ..
... .. ... ...
...
fI'l ... 1ft
~ II') , , li Ii! ~ ... Cl l::l :s ~ ..
... ...
...
it .. Ii! . ~ ~ l:! Sl ~ ! lR S ..
...
i =:l !ill ~ III Ii! ... ! ~ ! ... Ii N
N o.
...
I t J If I I H J I 1 I
cI ! J !
I J ! ~ ! ~l ] ...
IiJ j J i
1.1
~
" ~I
I jJ
I ,J
1! ,j
J_ ~ f~
w=a 1"
~ i t!
.!.t' ~
~th
is il
C !l
~ 'Ie
j
.
D-7
~
J
I
{
~
i
-
.s
!
51!
-
.lJI
II
f!1
~IJi
f~ll
!,~
;.;",.'V'II!"
"'
, ',,~-
.
MAJOR SOURCES IN CHULA VISTA
Emissions O"onsIYear)
COlI\Pany I Address ROG CO NOx SOx TSP
Pacific Energy, Otay Landfill 1 47 48 2 1
Rohr, Foot of H Street 51 0 1 0 2
. SDG&E, 990 Bay Blvd. 16 470 1776 15 46
Encore Mfg. dba Pacific Tambour,
2500 Main Street, #C & D 30 0 0 0 0
Nelson & Sloan, 7th & Main Street 0 0 0 0 61
ROG - Reactive Organic Gases
CO - Carbon Monoxide
NOx - Oxides of Nitrogen
SOx - Oxides of Sulfur
TSP - Total Suspended Particulates
.
1)-C)
.
o
"
~
-,.-.
""
"
'i
....0
-'
-0
-:>
~,
---,
'"
<...-"
, ------
\
.
~ .1
o
~
'_1:-
"'C".:: :.
.... ~ Co. j
.,.
0- I:~ ~.-
,
Co.!" ll. =.
'to '.
~, h :- IE
l,.! c.. I::
.,:, ,,.. "0 ~-.
,-
, . 'to
:i.. .... co..- <.
o ~
::.
~
>
r
=>
Z
,
...
W
W
'"
...
'"
,
'-'
o
..J
c
- .,
-:.0...-
", 0-
IZ -
,'".
C::. c.
"
,
-j(:
-.
~ .:
. ~
,
~
.
>-
... :>
~
(..:. <:
, ..J
,.) =>
o %
..J '-'
'C
EO.
o =
-. l.. C "
.1. 0-" t .,.
"C ,; .- _ '1;1 S ~,
", .,::: C'" o:t'.. ::.,..)
.. Q,...."C -. s:: '"
_ '- I II Cr Q. I"';' W
T.: ~ 't:I.,. UJE.
.:::.:.:: ,- to. a.. 0'- ~.... I Q<t
~-..- :..o'O.~OZ
.=,.IIG.o....c:.fri....,I
o j _ - -..c I~
... u 0.. Gi "CC UJ
-' I~ e,... l/" ....L:J <:: >
," "':"" !. - >- c:: <t
,:-;... 0.- I .0.... 3-
_ ~ 1. Il: ~ .: L E tnUt ~
.-...:... I:" _ ~. ill =:0 '-' 0 0
"Cz 0 ...~(.;;.
...j::"
"
'"
w
Z
3
o
0-
0-
OJ
",
'-'
"-
00
<t
.-
'"
,"
OJ
..
en
w
"-
CO
'"
co
e:
:::-
'-
.,..
z-
:-c
L:..:O
-'0
'"
<
...
'"
-
:>
'"
..J
=>
%
U
~
'"
"-
o
.-
"..J
-..J
"'-
II';:!
"
",
~
'"
.-
[f:
'"
"
'--
I>'
7.-
:>1>'
;";':0:.'
-.J C.
(;::.
"
<
...
01
:>
'"
..J
=>
%
...
"'01
tf'
W
"''''
l",,,-
-<t
,...:::!'
"
-
o
'"
",
'"
'"
o
...
01
'"
C
0_
~ -
I>'
z-
",
:>1>'
wc
..J C.
;.;.j c'
o
~
'"
...
'"
:>
'"
..J
=>
%
'-'
...
In
"
'"
"
r
oc
O..J
1>'"
,,-...:1
t..
I'
-
M
..J
'"
...
z
W
'"
~-
z-
WI>'
r-
"-
-I>
=>0
ClC.
w-:
o
'"
"
.-
co
-
:>
'"
-'
=>
%
'-'
"
."
-01
I'
,:,x
M
...
z
"
"-
..
>-
e
;;;
0_
...1>
=>-
"
I>
O1C
..JO
We:
"'c
"
"
.-
In
-
:>
'"
-'
=>
%
'-'
t-
In
'"
...
!;
",i:
nw
Ole"
1>'-
U-l\
.L
"
M
-
-
'"
W
.-
Z
W
'-'
z
'"
"'
..J
..J-
c; -
uo
'"
---go
zo
"'c
:>c
cc
"
'"
.-
In
-
0>
'"
-'
=>
-%
-I;.:'
-
'"
"'
t-
'"
..J
In
In
W
..J
'"
'"
%
U
"
:>
'"
..
MO
_cc
"'f"
"
M
<.:l
Z
%
III
-
Z
"-
W
"
t-
Z
W
>:
"-
;;,-
w-
0-
z-
'"
',)0-
-0
<<0
l.uC
>:0
"
'"
t-
",
-
:>
'"
-'
:>
%
'-'
"-
.
"
t-
In
r.Z
'<-
., '"
0"":
e:
..
o
'"
'"
'-,
Z
z
o
-
%
u:
"'-
"--
I>'
Z-
OO
,_, Cr
-0
.:c c'
u.: c'
>: C.
'"
'"
.-
'"
:>
'"
..J
:>
%
'-'
c-
w
w
'"
tn.-
"''''
'"
CO-!
"
~
o
o
"
'"
w
'"
'"
-'
00
~
u
"'
t-
w-
.--
"'I>'
a:
"-I>
CO
0;0
c.. C-
"-0
<
"
...
'"
:>
'"
-'
:>
%
U
C
'"
'"
..J
..J
W
1>3
,,~
.,,,
I.~ r.:
1":":
'"
0-
C
0-
0-
o
CO
'-'0
Q:C
<
'"
t-
V.
-
:>
'"
-'
:>
%
'-'
"'>
'"
:J
C
.,'"
., 0
""'
!"',C
C.
on
0-
..
C
I>
It
C
00.
'-' C
"'<'
'"
'"
...
III
-
:>
'"
-'
=>
%
U
Q
'"
Z
o
>-
z
'"
'-'
:r
"'l>.
'"
a:
<.:l
1>"'
I' -'
"W
l"..-
o
,.
I'
...
W
..
<C
r
"
'"
'"
(;..c
>: .,..
~.-
" .,.
c.
00
l;,..',-
0>:0
'"
'"
...
III
:>
'"
-'
:>
%
u
'"
......
o-lIl
"
2=
...
o
c
.,
u
"
",
;
'"
~,
..,
"
~
C!::_
U) -
'::;0-
"--
'I>
C
0:::,
,_, c
a:c
<t
'"
.-
III
-
:>
'"
-'
:>
%
'-'
t-
III
<<
'"
'"
>:
.,0
"''''
"'"
Mo.
C
o
'"
'"
..
c.
o
c
..
'.
z
",
~..-
::..
~
.-
-
"
~...-
c:::.. ~1
"
w
,
',1>'
C'
C: c.
0::::-
'"
-.
r
'"
...
to
~
:>
<<
-'
=>
%
'-'
"
o
<>
.
III
III
'"
...
III
"Z
.,-
1''''
2:E:
'"
I'
...
c
'-
,'.
.
-'
~
I>
...
0.
"-
If'
o
<
,
",
~,
l.'
>
...:
!!'
C
0-
'"
Z
<<
'"
'"
C
~.
'-'
~_..___I
.
--
< <-
~
.,
=
--
> ..
"
~
"
"
...J
"
~.
:>
"
"
,....Cl
c...u:.
'"l"r-
.',
,.
,
l:;!
"
.'
~
,.
~o-
,.
::;..c
<.
<;
~
(~,
:>
"
...J
::>
x
c'
<>
"
3
o
",,0:
"'0
r,;,C!;:
....~
o
C.
"
.-
.,
~
:<
u
o.
=
"-~
10.:'-
I.:.-~
.;.
o
"
c
>-
<<
~>-
"':l/"J
~-
t!:::>
~~
~, ...J
::>
...J'X
-l '_'
W
3
C
-'
"
'-'
CO
%.
<
'"
3
o
'"
'"
...
m
'"
'"
"
r
CI~ 0
", ...J
t., <:
~, "
0-
'"
..
~n
~
\.:.'0
,,~
~.
ut'
C
" c.
c
_0
'"
"
>-
",
:>
"
...J
::>
X
'-'
"
W
.....
....'"
o
C":r
<'.
o
'"
..
~o
u:
"
ro
c
1-- C
l"'lC'
...Co
'"
"
~
'"
-
:>
"
%-'
0::>
-X
... .->
"
'"
c:.
...
<<
'"
<C.
"
W
>
::>
\:.
%
"
>-
""
<
o
"''''
..-
-X
", >-
":t~,
'"
'"
C',
..
e.
u.'
"
"
'"
'"
"-
:s:::
l.'"I__
'"
,,-
<-
l.:.;c"
'"0
o
...:I'::'
:C
<
>-
'"
:>
<
-'
::>
:x
'-'
%
"
<<
'"
w
1:>:>
"0
-...J
""-'
C.
o
o
'"
m
<
<0
.',
>-
"-
"
c
~::
"">
"0
Q:JC
C
oe
'"
<
...
'"
"
"
-'
::>
:x
'-'
..
"'>-
"''''
o
" '-
"
I..
0>
'"
"
'"
<<
w
'"
"
'"
;:;0
,,,..
~-
5".
CC
c
~.:.
::: c-
.::::
"
...
IS:
"
"
-'
::>
:x
'-'
"
"
..
.0
N'"
"''''
C.r'",
'"
=
'"
0>
II'
"
"'
Z
<0
;.:J-
~'"
u-
<"
>-0
_c,
ZC
00
'"
"
>-
III
-
"
"
-'
::>
:x
'-'
'"
"
'-'
%
"
'"
W
-'
W
'"
Z
<
'-'
.
w
'"
<0:
"
...
.. -
r:;z
",0
O~
co
D-12
.
'"
'"
%
...
o
o
'"
"
<
r
o
...J ..
w..
c-
,,~
>-0
-c
ZC
00
'"
"
...
'"
-
:>
"
-'
::>
:x
'-'
'"
'"
W
:.J
'"
<~
0:
W
"'lL
"lL
..w
..,-.Q..
o
'"
-
..
'"
<<
w
z
"
l.,W
-'
<C'
o
0--
"'~
c_
>..
wo
...Jo
"C
0::0
'"
"
...
'"
-
"
"
...J
::>
:x
'-'
<
"
<
..
"''''
"''''
OM
,
.:
'"'
N
m
<<
w
%
..
W
-'-
C'_
..
>-
<
30-
"'0
"0
roo
<<0
'"
"
...
'"
"
<
-'
::>
:x
"
...
<m
'"
w
'"'-'
-..
0"
,,%
0:
&
'"
0-
..
'"
>-
%
"
-
",
:":
;.:.
-'
-,
...
"
o
-'0
<-
,~) D'
0-
zc
3e
o c.
<<'"
'"
"
>-
'"
"
<
...J
::>
:x
'-'
o
'"
%
o
>
z
<
'-'
:x
<H.
<
'"
'"
..w
,,-'
"w
~....
<0
(.,j
'"
0-
w-
>-
-0
<<0
o
>0
;:'0
'"
<
0-
'"
-
"
<
...J
::>
:z:
u
'"
o
I-
U
"
-
'"
::>
o
:z:
'"
<
0-
'"
'"'
<00
"'0:
M!"',
o
o
<0
'"
~
z
- -
:..;..-
l.l...{'
0-_
"
~
"-'"=
CO
..' C
o
'-'
"
0-
IS:
-
"
<
-'
::>
:z:
u
"
<
<
<
%
<
""
-'"
I:'-l_
..%
'"
0-
...J
!!;
'"
-'
..
-
2
'"
::>
"
" -
__co
z-
'"
C:C"
~c
-,
~c..
c'
<
I-
'"
:>
<
...J
::>
:z:
'-'
'-'
z
'"
w
W
...J
<>
<
3
o
0><
"'0
0",
.,'"
o
.-
C'
"
L-:,
'"
"
C
-,
<
C'
;f.
<::::'
(". ~
~ c
<::0
"
~
",
:.
.<
...J
::>
:z:
,-.
<
-...
"''''
o
Z' . '
",
",
"
L
""_ c.
<
0-
IS:
"
<
...J
::>
:z:
'-'
'"
0:
Z
o
>
z
"
c'
"
"..
<<
0:
'-'
..u.
-...J
-u.
"'1~
C
C',
~,
~
<
>-
u:'
:>
<
-'
::>
:x
u
...J
:!:
Q
"
-
'"
%
<%
"
<
..
"'''
0...
"'~
c.
u.
,
,
<
L
"
,
~
.
i
<
,
<
<
.
<
L
,
iIll
.
.
"
c
.
~
:<
~
,..
'"
".
,
=-
=:
c
,
e
....'-,
'.
<:
".
:'
'"
5
Q
a:
'"
"'
<l:;~
'"
-'
c
,0
0-
"
"
:..,.v.
;.:. '~.
-.
-
'"
~
Cf:
"
<
-'
::>
:r
'-'
'"
o
"'
0-
z
-
'" .
c. 0
~~ r::-
:>C',
~~
'.
<<
...
"
"
<
-'
::>
:<
'-'
o
<:<<
<:
...
g::;
,'. c
....
o
....
o
<'
>-
,n
'"
'"
c:.
"
~
'"
"-
<0
.. -
:.r ~.
o
~ "
.J 0
- c
~ c>
<<
...
"'
:>
<
-'
::>
:r
c'
'"
;:>'".i-
!"':.t!'
...
DO
...
co
o
c:.:
:<
L'".
>
...
"
<Oc
t.. _
:.fl"
--
~
e-
<0
-1(.)
~c
:::c
'-
<:
...
"'
:>
..,
:;
:r
C'
<
"'
c
-.(I:.r,
'"
C'
OJ
"
<<
...
~.
r
~
~,
.,
;..i,.;
,
-<c
... ,.
(nO'
0-
-:-0
-Ie
~~
<<
...
l"J
0>
<
-'
::>
:r
'-'
<:
'"
or:; 1-
;-"l'"
o
..,
<-
"-
co
'-' .....
o
,,-
",e-
"':0
(....c
ero
-c
"
<
...
'"
:>
<
-'
::>
:r
v
<>-
<:
'"
o
n<
0-0
.'"
It",'-'
'"
o
DO
Co'
Z
..
z
Q
~
::1...
z:-
0-
0-
o
<.t'
zc
oc
~ c-
c',:=.
u
<<
...
'0
:>
<
-'
::>
:r
v
.....
"'
<
(..;r-
".-
oz
~ ~.
<-
o
"'
v
z
'"
z;
-
"'-
<:-
~t'
c.
-0-
<<0
on c'
i:l;C'
oe-
C'
<
...
'"
:>
c
-'
::>
:r
Co'
<
....
Co'
<>-
<:
'"
o
= "
("'",:-
.f ~~
.,c
-w
MLLi
.r..:t:
D-13
.
on
on
>-
'"
c::
'"
o
0_
...'"
::>-
<
0-
trJO
-c
>:;:,
<<c
Q
c
...
"'
:-
<
-'
::>
:r
Co'
...
...
w
v
-
:>
'"
w
"'
'"
o
...
<
_0
0-
<t'
a:-
:.&.:0-
xc
='c
..J':'
WO
o
<
...
"'
:>
<
-'
::>
:r
c'
N
W
::>
'"
N
<
:>
'"
..I
'"
'"
'"
a:
<>
<
'"
o
.. <
..0
"'a:
" ;...
o
~
o
....
..,
>
z
<-
"-
~
c
'-'
co
;0-
<(-
0:'"
, -
'-::
we-
,"0
me.;,
w c.
0:0
o
<
...
"'
-
:>
<
-'
o
:r
'-'
<<
.,
..
(';1-
0-0'
_-~ ..J
"
N
"'
"
,
u:
a
'"
z
<<
w
.;c
Co'-
'"
z-
t'
,"0
:>c
_, c
"'0
o
c
"'...
l.I:tr.l
0::>
"-
a:<
"'-'
"'0
z:r
wv
Co'
Z
w
v
:>
0:
'"
"'
'"
on
<<
<<
"'...
.'"'
N
< ;.-
0-
on
o
..,
N
"'
...
w
z
-
'"
<:
c,
.,.
xr::.
w-
....
tn_
<(
~t'
:<c
co'c
.....-:-
::>0
o
<
...
"'
-
:>
<
-'
o
x
Co'
...
<t.'1
W
'"
."
"'-
-<<
,.........
-
on
0-
M
...
(--~
..
"-
~
(f,
~-
w.
x-
V
"'t'
o
-,C
'" C,
<0
W
<<
...
"'
-
:>
<
..I
::>
:<
v
<<>
<<
'"
o
.<:
.0
....'"
o ~.
c
o
'"
"-
-
on
'"
'"
z
...
'"
"
"
'"
"
...:
,-.
,.
"
...
!
;::' :;-
'-' -~
.,.
w-
<0
...J,:.
.....:::::
(.',':
<:c
"'
<
...
"'
"
<
..I
o
:<
Co'
>-
<
'"
""
0:
<<
"-
w
"'...
~2
"
,
,""
.0
.,
.0
0;
",
{f,
~
~
iT'
'"
1.:.'
0.0
c-
<:
at'
e. c.
c.'
~c
~
..
c.
<<
...
"
:>
<
-'
o
x
Co'
<<
...
."
-
0>
<<
-'
o
:r
Co'
on
<<
N
..
...
<(:/';
:r
.....
t-t!'l
-'"
-':.\.0.
"
<
"
_c
~!!:
c
,
.
L
"
"
.
<
"
=
"
~
.
"
.
"
.'
(.1
.
~
=- 0 0 0 ... on '"
~, 0- .,. '" OJ .,. [') <> on '" <> '" ,-,
-<> "' "' If> .,. ... ... on <> ... If> .... OJ OJ t'
r, .... <, ... ... .,. ... .... '" '" "' N ,-,
<-
-
0 -' .'
U < Z
....
- '.:>
'" '" Z '" Z u -.r,
- "- z >::
- .... :1 "'
.... :J Z '.:> ~, '" 0 ~, -'
- '" '.' e:, :r z <t ~, In .... In Z 0 {:". ~
- t:t. "- " "- =- < Z - ,-' > '"
- ~ L:. "- " ., 0 ", ,-
.. .. " " '" ~ .... - '" r~, z
<> In > '" '" '"
.... '" :r '" " C, UJ In 0 '" <= - ,
"- , .. 0 '-' 0 UJ 0 '" 0 0 <> UJ " - - < " .'
~ - :J - '-' - UJ en '" 0 "' '-' -- .. .. .. .. .. ., ...
, c:. 0 c. . L', , - ~ 0 0 0 0 " " Z " "- .,. :J 0- .,. ~. ~ :. .,. 0 :1 t" U' " .;-
< '" - u: .... ... .... " '. '" .... u. .... ~ .... '" - 0 .... .- 0 .... " - "' ..
, :1 ~ '" ~ '" ... U .. -' :1 .:..
"' ': . 0- :2: t' " '" t" Z 0- Z ~ 0 " 0- .,. -' " "''' " ~ e- " '" "
L.~ ,- C "' " ..;:, '" e: c UJ (r N <0 C. 0 < <> '" C. .... '" 0 CO -' C C
.' C
,', c. Co '" C. C' >- ~ '" < C ... <> ... C C '" C C ., C C- O :> "
.. 2' 6 .- c' "' c' c -- C' 0: ., Co <0 C to C C ,;;:, c e:' ~
. '" - ~ '" <: '" c' "" c, u. <> 0 <> '" <> '" c C <t C '" C . c.
.. '-' " :r :r :r :r ., ., '" -' -' -' ..
"" '" .. .. '" <t <: '" '" .. < " c < < < < "
- ... ... ... .... .. .... .. .... ... ... .... .... ... .... ... .... .... .
'" :/" " tr. tic " (I'. '" en '" tr. to t" '" '" '" tr.
- - - - - - >-
> > > > > > " 0- =- :- :> :> :> :> :> :- :- > "
..
< .. < '" '" '" < < '" '" < .. '" < " .. < <
5 -' -' -' -' -' -' ~ -' -' -' -' -' -' -' -' -' "
-, :J :J :J :J ~ :J :J :J :J :J :J :J :J :J :J c,
:r :r :r :r :r :r :r % % % % % % :r % % .
-- c' " '-' '-' c' " '-' " '-' t..' u U '-' t..' t..' U t..' <
,
<.
t..'
'" Z '" .... .~~
u. '" '" ~
.. 3 UJ
% UJ CO
'" .... ... 0 --
In '" ..
Z '" UJ "
UJ :J '" (:
'" < 3 UJ "
:J % , .... r
< :J '" In
% N <> 0
- ...
:> "-
< UJ ..
'"' C In In ..
'" .... -' UJ tr.
- In CO '"
>
:> <: UJ z -' '" %
.. '"' -' - < W '"' >
..> " <: ..... " <> .. <-' << <- < c> <> <:<: <: <t <3 " "
" < .... " In .... " < J: '" < < <: .... ~ ... <
c ! In Z In 3 :> > ... 3 3 -' In In > In C
'" < < '" " 0: In C C '"
..~ -< O-Z 0> ...... -Z c:<: '" If> > ... -:J ...... ...." -" 0> ....Z .,.'" [')'" "'Z '" ~
~.. C' , e:, ....- ...'" ....'- 0- 0-0 [')C "'" 0% [')Q [')'" [')c, [')0 -<< .,.- ....t..' _UJ 0-- - ~
.. " '"',-: r'~ .... 0'" 0-0: 0"- 0'10::' ->- -... ".. .., "'''' Cl(J::: 0>- -< 1'".1< "'.. 0<
- .. ':>;: 0' ,- " r OO'~ 'll"'"", ~":) - -' ~- ':"1::t _L.:: l.r~ oc c:r ',:C l"':!~ <:>:: ,.
") < -- 0 c, 0 '" 0 0- (- ,y:, "
L
D-H
L. .. .:;, ". . .. , , ,- ~. .-..- .. ...
.
e
~
Il:
~
c
C'
--' ..
<
,.
Lr,
'c
-'
<:
"
tC.
~: r
~..., ...:
"'
,.
"
. "
~
" ,
~
<:
0-
~
:>
<:
5
~
<:
.
"
>-
L',
~z
c'_
" '"
.." 'Z
...
...
c
-
,
z
-=
'-
.:
~
;
i":'
L.:_
:- 0"
.'
c
"
c
r
..
0-
u:
:>
<:
5
:r
"
>-
..
-'
:>
:r
.
is
r..
>-
~
'"
..>-
'"
"
'"
:.<
.....,0
.~
o
<.
'"
N
..
.'
(!"j
-
~
..
-'
I
co
"
c.
~:'
z
-
~
~
c.....
>-0
=:>-
=;;..
< '
<-
..
>-
'0
:>
..
-'
=>
:r
u
'"
>-
'"
""%
0-
c-"
..
C
."
o
'-
,.
z
"-
C'
"-
tl:
..
"
"-
u,
"',
,,-<'
,.-.';>
c
..::c
"
"
>-
"
-
:>
<
-'
~
'-'
<:r
'0
"
"'0-
..-
:>z
{,
o
('",
L
co
"
C--
L::(""
'"
,. ~
= ,-'
C'C
~. .:
~=
..
0-
""
-
:>
"
-'
=>
:r
'-'
"
L'r
r'ff,
.~ ..:
C
."
N
,.,
c.
-'
,,-
L'
0-
"
-<'
=>0
-:c
-0
r
..
>-
to
-
:>
..
..J
=>
:r
'-,
"
,
.
'"
>-
'"
_z
It. -
. <:
.,-,
"
.0
."
....
"
0-
0-
-'0
_c
"-c
00
r
<:
>-
""
:>
..
..J
=>
:r
u
'"
,.,>-
"''''
c
f
N
o
..
0-
L'
~~,
"-::
00
r
..
>-
'"
:>
"
-'
=>
:r
c-,
'"
:>
"
to
"'''
'"
~ ~,
~
b-15
...
"
...
C
0-
0-
,~
=c
". c'
CO
r
"
>-
'"
:>
..
..J
=>
:r
u
o
'"
z
o
>
z
"
'-'
:r
....
"
..
"
0::' ....
"''"''
-~
~ -
"
o
,.,
'"
"
0-
W
'"
o
...
=>
"
'0
w
:;::::c
ro-
,
0-
-'0
-0
C:!o
00
r
"
>-
'"
:>
..
..J
=>
:r
u
"
~'_ I-
<'"
~Lw
,.,
0-
'"
o
(,.:......
..JO-
o
0-
..JO
_C-
0:00
00
r
..
...
'"
:>
..
..J
=>
:r
'-'
>-
..'"
'"
w
....-'
0-"-
"'..
_z
6
z
'"
c
--
<C-
o-
-"-
zo-
00
'" c'
-' c.
'"0
z
>
..
>-
o
'"
'"
>
'"
'"
....
=>
'"
"'>
...<:
La. I-
(~ e,
::)
z
"
'"
..J-
<n-
o-
-"-
zo-
00
""0
..JO
WO
Z
>
..
>-
o
<n
>-
'"
z
-
"''''
r
'".
...'"
"'...
C'
o
"
...
z
"
"-
.,
>-
o
o
""
"
...
=>
"
:-0
<n_
,,0-
w-
"'0-
o
WC-
(..., c'
-c
z
"
>-
'0
:>
<:
:5
:r
u
z
w
:>
.."
'"
'"
-:>
<--0
c.'-;l
.
,
N
'"
...
N
0-
'-'-
0-
0-.
Z
<:L'
..Jc
c'
~ c.
..0
c
<:
...
'"
:>
..
..J
=>
:r
u
o
.
,"
...
'"
oz
...-
-<
c_ :::
,
>
'il
, -
~
I.l:::'
"0-
:::.~
.. c.
0-
o
'-'
w
-
'0
%
..
'"
..J
..J
"-
o
..z
<<
-'
.,>
"'..
C?!:'
c~
..
o
...
...
'"
c
"
.
-
-'
5
"-
., -
.... -.
... ,-
"
c:[
~
""
(;.
,-
"
-"
~g
~i;.
,
"
_ c
~, c
;, c:
<:c:
0-
c
'-'
"
<: z"
0- _0-
tr. ~U')
<n_
:> ..:>
..J
.. "'''
..J 0-'
::> z::>
:r ..:r
u en '_I
.-:;
'"
"
%
>-
..
o
u
w
r
u
..
o
"',
'-'
.
..
>-
'"
"z
>-
'"
"
, 0
~~
0-%
...-
-..
, z:
"
....
-,
~.
.
.
-'
'.
~
.
<
~
~-
c'
,.
"
~
~
..
..J!.
<.:~
"
<
..
=
'-
"
..
...
'"
<:
~
>:
~ -
'"
c-.
""
.. .-
I.:.: ~.
'."-
;..,
Co :
. "
:./. ;~
1.0.:0
"
c:
"
c:
>~
2:'-'
X
..
z
'"
...
..
"
...J
..
m
w
X
~
"'
<"
c:
CO
nx
c..
0'
o
~,-
z
.....~
~ ~
0=:
"
c:
...
to,
...
=-
<
:!
:r
",
~
m
X
<
u.
c
-...
00
~:
'"
n
-<l
,
,
,,:..
~
o
....,-
C
> -
"
<
...
tc.
"
c:
...J
~
"
c:...
"0
<
(";-
-z
'"
'"
.-,
-
o
.
>--
...
_0-
'_' C
0"
-C
l!O
"
~
to
...
"
<
...J
~
r:,
'"
c:o:
w
~
-In
OW
..... =l
c: ~
eo
'"
...
"
'"
...
~,
...J
Z
o
",
'"
'"
.,
"
'"
ii'
c-
>--
e,
Z"C'"
'_' Co'
'"
C
"
<
~
:>
<
...J
::>
X
V
'"
:>
<
"'co
~.:::
.::
o
...
.,
'"
...
'-'
'"
"'
'"
>-
c:
.:::;
U',
tc
'.
'"
z
;..:c
->-
C-
>--
z"
~ <:.'
o
.;:: c.
o
'"
<
...
m
...
:>
<
...J
::>
X
V
<
:>
<
'"
0-0
:::>c:.
'f~ -.
OJ
OJ
U',
-<l
OJ
'"'
:,
~
'-'
"
Z
>-
(,;:".....
~"
~. ....
00-
'." 0
o
cg
f.f:
<
-
cr,
...
:>
<
:!
:r
V
<
"'-
-<ltc,
~ l
...~
:>
~-
--
ro-
-
>-
"'''
COO'
0'
.:.. C'
0"
'"
<
...
'"
:>
<
...J
:>
X
'-'
<>-
<
"
CO
0<
"'C'
-0:
,,0.:'
C
n -l(C
o
o
OJ
o
0-
0-
c
'-' ....
"'.
.",
0-
i.:lO
C
Cl e,
C.
to
<
...
to
...
:>
<
...J
:>
X
V
"
'"
<
~
,.~
,,~
c<:
r'.T.
...
N
o
V-
wo-
."
"
"""
o
COO
o
to
<
...
to
:>
<
...J
:>
X
V
...
Z
C
-'
'"
>-
C
OJ
:r
...
::>
o
to
<,
...J
...
'"
M>-
,.,<
C. ....-
'"
N
-
-<l
W
'-'
:>
'"
u.
'"
c
S
...
:;0
u.
-'-
V-
0-
,,-
'"
<0'
C
,"0
l~
~O
(!'.;
<
...
'"
:>
<
-'
:>
X
'-'
'"
"
Q:
o
.,
<
...
W
0.
o
'"
o
<
:>
<
'"'
" "
DO'"
.. -
'"
'"
.,
...
<J)
'"
'"
Z
<
Wo
-,-
V.
W
r_' 0-
-0
:>0
~c
"'0
'"
<
?-
m
...
:>
c
-'
:>
X
'-'
u
z
'-'
E
:>
<>-
<
"
"
-0<
...0
€~
0-
0-
OJ
Q:
"'
I-
Z
'"
,.
i
c'
...
"
'"
r
..
r'
'"
:>
.. ..
-..
:>.
x-
'.'
"
0.0
(rC
<: c,
:::0
tr;
<
I-
tc,
...
:>
<
-'
::>
X
"''-'
Q:
<
'-'
X
...
-'
<
w
X
0.
Q:
<
X
to
...
V
'"
W
...
Z
W
'-'
<
-'
<
"
0--
-CO
MW
.J)Z-
C
o
'"
,-,
t-'
~
c
,:.
..
u
:>
,
c
!:
0-
....!C;;
_iC
1..:' ,-
ro
tc
c
...
to
...
:>
<
-'
:>
X
'-'
<
:>
<
N
OJ"
.:--to:
-<"
0-
0-
o
.,
""
g.
~
l-,
i,{:
..
7
C'
~
"
..
"
'"
"
,
o
=
...11'
-'l'
'"
'"
C'
-!C
t;:,
::! c.
!,!';
c
o
....: c,
~.. ,'-
XC,
to
<
...
'b
-
:>
<
-'
:>
X
"
<>-
<
"
"
N<
MO
MC<
-,"
C
.
0'
e,
o
~
"
.
:0
-~ "
c'
<
...
tc.
...
:>
"-
...
to.
.
I-
o
"
::'
<
...J
:>
X
.'
<
:5
:::
",
"
co
<
U'
"
II:
Z
<:>
>-
z
<
V
X
<0.
<
'"
"
"'"
-<l-'
"w
--
C
,
~
>
(r:
~
C
I-
U
"
<<
"
~
~
"
<'"
<
...
.,-
-<z
00
lf1.:c
C'-:
..
..
.
.
,',
.
--
:r '
C'
"
.
'"
=
.
<-'
'<
~
~ ~
c
"',
"
c
~
"
,
.
=
-,-
_,C
~
"
"
"
"
w
o~
-uo
<<
-
o
"-
w
"-
"
~.
0:1.
<~
:r-
_c
~
..... ~.
-<
~
~,
>
"
-'
~
:r
.,
<:
:>
<<
'"
MC
CO:
-..
-
o
.,
~
'"
-'
.',
0-
~
">-&
- -
C:.
0-
_. C
:. c
=e-
f.:";
"
~
t(",
-
:;.
"
-'
~
:r
'-'
<>
<
3
Q
f'l<
"'0
"'co
,'~ .:::
a
'"
o
'"
z
"-
"'
:.:..-
>.
,,-
"'
.
E2 ~,
Eo
en
<
0-
en
>
<
-'
~
:r
u
<
0-
en
0-%
., -
"'''
:gJ:
'0
"'
.,
'"
z
o
CL
>-
~
"'
~
"'
l,;";-
~o-
..:-
0-
=e-
~o
=-e
oC'
or.
-<
~
'"
-
>
-<
-'
~
:r
u
.
~
<'"
'"
0:
1>>
--<
1>"-
.,
"
0-
0-
"-'
z
'"
e
>:
~
'"
"-
:3
:r
~
:0>
o
'"
>
o
~
"
"--
e
>-
~.
c:.~
:rco
!-(:
::.r::
00
L'
-<
~
en
>
-<
<.'-'
%:>
-:r
u
w
%
-
'"
-<
J:
-
'"
W
3
:r
0-
:>
Q
'"
-<
..~
0'"
~; ,-'
o
o
..
w
co
"'
~
-'
c:
'-'
-'
" -
w-
,,0-
"'-
W
31>
:re
l-C
- ,-
co
'"
-<
0-
'"
-
>
"
-'
:>
:r
u
o
'"
'"
UJ
<;s::.
-<
..I
a>
-"
,:"'1-
....Co
o
"
'"
f'l
'-'
z
-
'"
-
'"
-'
"
'-'
'"
0-
'"
Z
,,-
w-
..I.
<.'-
>.
"'CO
we
L:.iC,.
"-0
"'
"
~
'"
>
-<
..I
:>
:r
'-'
<
>
"
o
f'l0
OJ!:::
0-
o
..,
"'
"'
'"
u
z
~.
z
co
"'-
.
"'-
"'
co-
u.c
"c
co
0-0
"'
"
0-
'"
-
>
-<
-'
:>
:r
<.'
0-
<'"
W
'"
.,>
a_
0"
.,u.
.,
D-\7
'"
.,
N
'"
-'
e
z
o
~
e
~
w
-
z-
0-
~-
".
"0-
t;g
zc
:>0
"'
-<
-
'"
>
-<
-'
:>
:r
<:.
e
-
co
0%
"'-
"'''
..,1:
o
'"
"
.
.
'"
'"
w
z
'"
w
-'
<.'
:r-
"'-
"'0-
"'-
"-
..
>0
ze
zc
=e
LO
"
-
'0
>
<
-'
:>
:r
<.'
<.'
-<
J:
-'
-<
%
o
'"
%
:r
Q
")
>
<
<
w
'"
<>
"''''
f'l-'
-'"
or
.
'"
..
'"
'"
..,
'"
UJ
Z
>
'"
o
'"
o
~
~o
<;:,
"':.
c:
_e-
"'0
wO
"-c
:>c
:Jl
C5
L'" ....,
,,-
coo-
'"
",e-
-0
co c.
ze.
:>0
"'
"
-
'"
-
>
-<
-'
:>
:r
'.'
-<
>
e
'"
",0
.,"-
Mr,
-<
-
"'
>
-<
-'
:>
:r
'-'
"
O-~
"'"
'"
'-i&.;
=,
0-
"
..
'-'
z
'"
J:
u.;
~
~
>-
u;
"
<;.-
"'0-
'-'-
o
0-
:=.C
"c
"0
30
LO
"
~
'"
>
-<
-'
:>
:r
'-'
<<
M~
a'"
-
"'co
..
a
.
"
-
'"
o
'"
'"
"
e
3
-'
.0
c
:r
"
>
~
'"
~
-
"
=
.:r-
wo-
--
e
:>0-
~e
we.
we
30
cr,
<
I-
lr,
-
>
<
-'
:>
:r
<.'
<
"'I-
..,0:
If]
-"-
o
0::-
f'l
c,
"
1-'
en
cr,
'"
..I
~
,
~.
o
'.
~,
.;,:.;.
z
"
~
~.
<<-
we-
" -
e
:<0-
I-C
we
L:..:C
:<c
'"
e
~
'"
-
>
<
-'
:>
:r
<.'
<
>
<
.
",:r
If]~
;"'-'
'"
.
'"
2
"
:r
"
~,
....::
~
"
........::.
w :~
GO
o
-'
c<<
0_
=u::
'-'-
"'>
=<
=5
:r:r
'-'
z
<>
z
:>
'"
w
0-
<
3
~
w>-
w<
:<'"
"''''
'"
<
"-
w
'"
<
-'
-
<'"
-<
w
_0
f'lN
0-
.:.j-
0-
"
~
-'
"
'-
~
~
"
"
'" .~
0'
o
z
-
t.::;<e
Z "
....v.
--
w:>
'"
"''''
<-'
J::>
:r
~'''-'
'-'
z
z
"-
'"
'"
o
<.'
'"
~
UJ
-
>
'"
<
w
'"
o
",e;
"'-'
t"'l.L'
rr.7.
,-
c';
C
o
~
.,
,
~
z
'-'
z
o
~
'"
'"
"-
e
r
.
,
"
<
<
'"
'-'
z
<
"-
"-
'"
"
<:.
'"
~
W
I-
o
=
,
,.
=
"
,
.
<
c
N
'"
"
c
.
"
,.. _.
.
".
-,
o
~
"'
"'
-<>
-
o
~
"
..,
DO
c
..,
"
o
c
n
'"
o
"'
'"'
'"
"'
"
or
-
o
'"
DO
"
DO
III
0-
or
o
"'
"
o
"'
"'
III
III
'"
-<>
n
n
Ir'
..
..,
III
'"
..,
" "
C:. '"
c.'
, z <r.
Iil " '" ... ,.
0. .. '" "- Z
. " c "' c.' " < <
l', '" ~
'" " cr: :> c.. '. "
.- "'- Z Z ~ c:.
~ !j -<> n w - 0:. , =
-" " .. '- ... ~ C C - e tc. - .., 0 c, c c " -- c c. c - ~
-- '" .- .., .. " .. ... .. on '" ..
~ ~ -- r .::: 0 " 0 ,. t- <: a a " " " Ir, a If. ~ ..J .,.. -' 0- - 0 , --
;:. ~. "- - .. - .. - .. - <: .. < - < - w - <- -
. If; ~ - .. .. :: ~ c:
, ~ - " 0 a - , co 0- ..J a ..J " -' " -' " -' " '-" " z " '" a .. a .' 0- r
~ "' ~ ~ '" 0 '" -- < 0 " e '" c: " 0 0 w c: <: c -' 0 c c_
"" C I,J c: C - X ,-' C' c' c:. c., c:, c.' 0 c.' c:, "- c: "'- '-' -, I.: - c ... ,c
C:. :i C- " C 0 c: 0 0 c: 0 c c C -' L:i
- -- :r '-' ; c z c z c: ~ c z c: z '-' on 0 ~ 0 " c w c:. c 0 -
'" '" '" '" '" ~ :r :r :r
"
=
o
.'
.
<:
:i
co .-
<.
.-["
-
~<
"
,
.~
c:
"
..,
.-
"
'"
<:
...
'"
-
"
"
~
"
-'
='
:r
'-'
,
"
..
o
oo
..
..
..
-
<r.
'-'
'"
z
c
,.
z
"
'-'
"
...
cr.
:r
<:
<:
'"
i':';
~:.L
,.
'"
.....
--:-(J'";
<:
...
'"
:>
"
-'
~
-,
"
...
<r.
:>
"
-'
'"
:r
"
"
-'
'"
:r
'-'
"
...
<.0
:>
co
~
:>
'"
'"
'"
"'>
'"
'"
co
.7.<(
eo".
<:
-.
Q.
e
...
"'..J
'"
~ .
z
<:
~'. :>
.(;~
c:." :-
'"
...
,n
-
:>
"
-'
'"
:r
'-'
...
'"
<
-'
..J
U
~:>
("'".r.;
-=,
"
...
'"
-
:>
"
-'
'"
:r
u
"
...
If>
-
:>
<
-'
'"
:r
c.'
co
"':<
"
..
"'-
CZ
"'C
~ ,:;.
C
"
'"
"'..
"In
;;':r
"
D-12
"
...
In
-
:>
"
-'
'"
:r
'-'
,,>
"
'"
CO
><:
aco
"''''
",,"i:!.o
"
...
'"
-
:>
"
-'
'"
:r
c.'
<>
'"
"
CO
"''''
:r.~
-.::..
c:.
"
...
'"
-
:>
"
-'
'"
:r
c.'
:>
'"
.,
U
...
o
,,"'-
".
.t;i.l..:
~>:
C,
'"
...
..,
-
:>
"
-'
'"
:r
u
"
"
'"
,",CO
Ill"'-
("'"I";
C
"
...
",
-
:>
"
-'
'"
:r
u
"
0...
.....
,,-,I-
e:
"
...
'"
-
:>
"
-'
'"
:r
u
..
..
..
"'"
'"
"'-
''',
"'-
-'"
O'"~
'"
"
...
'"
:>
'"
-'
'"
:r
u
..."
"'...
E.<.o
:::-
,,:>
'"
"
"'--'
"''''
C:r
U"..:o
z
'"
E.
'.
'"
"
:>
o
'"
-
'"
:r
'"
E
"-
..
"'-
CO
W
"..J
"
CO
cr.
&r.'"
... _.
(""ir;,r
C..
~
:>
"
w
z
"'-
:z
>
'"
orz
c<:
0"'-
a
"
..
to
:>
"
:5
:r
c.'
"
."
..
'"
u
~
~
~
Ir....
OUl
0-
0"
~
3
c.,..
L ..
c
,. ,
.
!'
-
~
-
"-
. -~
-
-~ - c c
,-
C- .. .. .. .. .. <- ,- "
If) - If)- ...- &1",- b-J -
r- _. .. .. M ,', Ie:
" - ",e- N" e- " _t>- ,,-t. I- e- c C,~ (1
--, - c- _c c c -0 -c - ~- . ~
0 c' 0 0 0 0 -, c. c
0 0 0 0- 0- ~.
c 0 0 0 0 0 c'
-
'" a: 0:
" .- ~ ,",j
" '-' If) ,-,
Z Z -c .. .. ...
-c '-' -c '.'
U; CO '-' ~ Z Z "
-' Z 0 Z c-
"' ..c, .., ~ .D .., ~ .c
- << ... t>- ... < '" '" tn t>- ""
<0 w<- L:J<(- <0 <0 U!4.0 Z<_ Z<:- <0 <0-
>iX "'...... :;Cl-oO ...- ... - ......- 0...... O~ '" ...- ~ ....j
- , ... Q:.ll'J O::t.n '" tn Z t" -tn -cr. tn ~
'" <- <- - u;- ... - ...- -
". => '-' 1::> x::> :> :> u:> <::> <:> :> :>
::'-J ," U" ... ...
l~ "' or. ';...'.... ..< ..~ <[ < < Z< "" <: Ul<: < <:
":,..;1.:. a: 0< -' -' ...I ...I 0-' -' ...I ...I ...I
, ~ e- ...Ie CO=> '-'=> => => -:> w:> w:> :> :>
- :- -' , Z%M Z%M %M %M to%M '-'%M '-'%M O%M O%M
... Z .. _w _ut>- -'-'0- ut>- ut>- _uo- -ut>- _L'o- L'UD- uue-
= :> z " Z " " t>- d' - " ... e- .. ..
- c ... "' - -' "' to ...I -' -
,.::. . .. : Z "' "- , "- I 0 I C I W W I I
.- <; < 0- W ] W C- C- C- '-' " 0: a: 0 >- 0 >
- I 0: 0: ~ '-' . '-' ~ a. "- " "- - . -.
.- <0 .,. :> Z -, Z -, w < -, > .- I: >r--x:
, .- M Z 0 j 0 , - I I ::'" I -, I , I ...0 I ~C'r
- < 0- M'" '-' <, '-' N .., -0 Z '" ... - '--- "--~
C ". -co :> < N < N 0: 0: < '" 0 0 -..- -..-
- :. .. '" >< >< % % :> u u 0: '"
.r - I W W 0 0 C 0: 0: %<: %<
-t', :> Z '" - .. ... 0: Q: < < < ....... ........
:."r,:; < 0: ... .. '" ... 0 '" '" ",If) "''''
'" '" -, w -0 -0 '" '" r-- .... ...- -If) -....,
'Z W I '" - - t>- t>- o - c_ c-
o:> C C fl - t>-W x: - - c '" - 0:- 0:-
:.:;:z- I: 0 -ClW=' C 0 0 '" '" '" '" '" 0
:> '" .. Ol:Z '" '" N '" '" '" '" ZN Z'"
.a: <: Z w -u< I 0 0
U:-J I '" , 0 IZZ.... .... .... > >
""C C> x: A -c 10...1 "' "' Z Z
- 1:- - :> " -....-::> < <
c.~. :;: w ~ W I- (t) U '-'
I ... o-_WCUJC < <% <% '" < '" < '"
Z < - 0:...10: '" < % '" % <
0 C Z ....0 - ... ... ... ... "- "- .. "-
~ - I ",-:> ... ... ... "- "- ... "- '" Z < Z '" Z < Z
--0 I: .. !!: z: I:> -:> -:> -0 _0 ..:> U-:;3 "'3 ...'" "0:
,... -. ::> '" u; Q.~t,..' 0< 0< '" '" M< -oC -oC "''-' W1',",
"'~ Z -' -%0:::- -0 -0 M.... M.... 0<: 0< "'W "W
I C "' " ,-' ...C ...c 00 00 -oC _0 "'C -...I --'
- 'iC - '''' co: 00: coo 00 00: 00: c<< OW ow
" I '.)-- M M "- I. M '" .:.0 ... ....
- C:.'" c ::. .
---" Z:Z -'...
.,. <' -
II. '- ~ ..~ ~ t. ,~ ~ '- .... ~ ... .
<'"'L "'"
.
,
- - - 0' 0' 0' 0' 0 .,-
0 0- - 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- 0- ,
i'"
. C 0' 0' 0' C C -- -='~
. C ~. CO- CO- O' 0' CO ,. 0 0- 0 &tJ 0
"0' -C'. - -0' -0' -C. -C, t: 0: -::. 0- ""
., 0' 0' 0' 0' O'. 0' 0'
c' < 0' 0" <> ~
C 0' C 0' 0' 0' 0' 0'
0" '" -<
on -0 -0
-' 0' C 0' 0' u " U u
0' C Co - 0'
d ~ .. '" ... '" ... '" ... .. ~ .. '" ..
L-. l"l 0- '" 0- on 0- 0" ") a-
. "" 1;"";< "'''' - "'...- "',,- "'...- "'...- "'- " "'-
" ~< -~ " -~... -~'" -~.. -~< -~'" ~.. ~ <: 1-'.(
.. '0 O;ttf; ..'" ... '0 ...'" '" '" :,r, In (,."";
C- O'- C- O'_ C- O'_
0> 0> (..f> "''':> (",:> "'1:> t.,,> t'...> :> :> :>
,~ ... . '" .'" .... . ... ." . '" ... ... ...
- -' '-'-': U-, <..,.... U-' U.... U.... "'-' "'.... ....
~= ,00 -::> -0 -0 -0 -0 -0 ZO zo <..'0
~ :I:~J :l:I:1"') ::::r:rl"":! :I::M :>:rM :>:rM 3:::t:r< -:rM -ZM ZZM
- Ot..:'cr 0 c' 0- , '-'0- 0 '-'<> 0 '-'a- 0 ,-'a- I Ua- ...J(,,'O' ...J'Jt'" _ r_,cr
. " '" C- O a- 0 a- 0 0- 0 0- 0 0- 0 a- C ". <>
'-' U <..' U U U to '" ...
, 0 0 0 I " " 0 V,
i< '- '" '- -' .... -' .... -' .... .... .... -' .... .... .... '-' C " C 0
< 0 < U U U U - U U .:; .
" - " 0 '" 0 '" CO CO 0 0 0 CO 0 CO "' "' Z "
, I 0 , 0 0 0 r "' 0 V, 0 0 0
., '0 .,. -' '" '" -' 0;. -' ., .... ., -' ., ... ... '" ...
c, " -' -' .... .... .... '" "I '" '" :> ..
to "- "' '" '" '" '" '" Z Z '"
e, :r :r :I: :I: Z :z: ::> " :z:
~ -' '" "' to '" "' "' In '" '-'
.. .. 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' 0' ..., '" <>
" -<0 .c '"
~ 0- 0' ... ... ... ... ... ... 0'
C 0' - -
-, '" 0' 0' 0' C 0' 0' 0' 0' 0 0
" (.~ "I "I N .. '" .. c. " N
M
- * ""
'" ... ... ... ... ... '" '" " " ...
'" f- '" C C C C C c '" ... C
tn "- to .. '" '" << '" '" '" "- "- '"
z z z z ...
,- ~: 1...:.' e~ UJ ~< "'" "'... "'... "'... "'... 0:::'- "':> .,...
.....x -0:: ""f- -<0- -<Of- -0_ -<Of- -<- ...<< W,,, 0--
'.:> -. :> C- O'_ C- O- 0- C- eo eo "1-
0- - - "'Z " - :r.Z L/?Z "'Z rz ,",c MC ..Z
" " ~; '" ~C' "'''' O~ Cr 0:0 .,'" ':'"'0 ?~ of co
;.~ - .:
. . ,-1)~21 (. . '- ( v ~~
.
. c c c
-
0 " 0 ~ ~ 0 .,. .,. 0 ~ 0
"'- 0;.- "'- 0- c
" L:-j j,;-j 0 0 0 '" ,',
" , '" , .,. 0 .,. 0- 0-.,. ....,. ....,. ... 0- ...c. , ,
- , .,.:. ...c 0::--"- -0 -0 - c -~ ..
c '? " 0 '" c' 0
c 0 c C c'
c - c' 0 c. c c
.. '"
u' u.' c.' c.' '-'
". " Z Z Z "
. '"
~ r, r-,
" w .:. .:. u
-' :: 0 z ...
.. . ~ L -< .. - '" ... or,
<: C- .... 0- 0 .... 0
."::: c. 1:,.'<':0 <<- <:- <- L:J<t.... I.U<- W<_ <- <:-
.......-- .... " ...... ....'" X" ~ r~ ~~... >:0- '" ...." .......
'" Qt'-. t1:< .1": to J:::"OO "- '" Ct:lr. '" '"
-"- W- <- <C_ <-
>: :' r:> :> :> :> r:> r:> E:::' :> :>
" <: '" << '" < < ., '" . < .!'<C < <
~~ t/"J5 .......! ...J ...J -' ...J ...J ...J ...J ...J
Ul:> => => => "'=> "'=> "'=> :> =-
- ->:'" -:r"'l >:'" >:M >:'" Z>:'" Z>:", Z>:M >:M >:'"
'- 0 :~ '''';' 0- >'.".:.(>- (,.;'0- c.'0 c.'0 -UO -~\o- -'-'0'- U'" UO
~ 0- 0 0 0 0 :: .,. Z 0 Z 0 0 0
" < -;' - -
...J . I I U. U. ... , I
. :> <- ::c' c. :- ,. >- -" U 0- u.. .... >- 0- > r
. >: . >: . ~ . . 0.: = 0.: '" 0.: '" 0.: . 0.: r. C
"- :: >: c.' r c.' E: r r E: .., < r < E:
,:.' , .G I . , I 0 I C , 0 , E: I r I .
-- .. "- '" M M M U .. c., .. t,,7. .. '" '"
:> ,'. '" 0.: 0 0 0 < < < .... 0-
!;' .,. < U <J <J >< >< >< U> U> C.
:I >: 0.: 0:: 0:: W W W W W U.
" .,., U, < < < ... .... ... '" '" .
c> 0 '" ., M '" M - - - .. ...
, '" It> ., It> "' '" 0 0 0 ... ...
c e, 0 0 c _ c- c- .. .. .. 0 0
- "'- "'- 0::-
0 e, ...0 "'0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
'.'-f "'-t UN UN ZN ZN ZN N N N (., N
0 0 0
'" 0:: > :- >
w w Z Z Z
0- ... -< < <
4t"'~ '" Z c.' c.' c.'
<w <w ... < < <:> <<:> "':> ... < <
- '" >: < :r: < >: < < << .<< < <
~ "- u.. "- u.. "- u.. - :> u.. :> u..
u.. ...J U. ...J u.. < Z ... Z ... Z W U. W u.. W u.. < Z < Z
Ol<: 0<< 0< 0-.:: 00:: 00.: Ntr. NUl Nt(: .., .., ,
,.. - -'-' -L' . "" ....'" ....'" alO al e, 0;0 oc .,.C 0
'..... r:,...., t-..o.:... ...'" "'w .,.'" ,. '" 0 '" -'" -0::
~~ -<0 ..,0 M_ M.... "'...J ~...... CO-' "'-' ,. - ....- ,.
02 C. (.l.' o~. Ct..I.. OL:' Ow CL;..l c.w (l;>~ "'''' ,
r r .,. r 0-
~ t iD'.2Z. l (,. j 8 .
.
e
~
~
<:.
"
.::
e-<;;
z .
-;.J.
.,-
~ -
::;:'r.
i
.-
r
"
<-
.
...,
'-
c
.,
:>
,.J
,
..,~
, 0
c
c
'" ..
'-",::
'"
>
z
S~
-:>
xt"'J
~ Vll"
:r O'
:,?
CO
'"
"
r
.'.
"
<-<
..
"'
%
c
u-
o
~., !;!'"
.. ~
,
C.
~
M
"'....
~.o
rn
,
C-
O
rn
,
N
.,
z
00"
"'--'
-:>
"M
~':-'o-
:r .,.
~
C
'"
3
r
.~.
'"
'"
o
..
o
'"
<<<<
..
~
C......
0%
,,: <:
"
c-
c
<
0,
,-,
...
<<
"'00
~-
u,
"
-<
:;
"'M
r...:o-
"
,
c.
o
rn
,
N
q
,
C
'-' ~
% -,
- ,
.0
'"
X
CO
'"
.,
o
..
o
..,
..
rn
"'X
"-
-00
CO
M,-
c.-O
0::0
.
....
N
0-
o
o
N
"-
(
c
,
c-
r.
c
c
o
'"
<0
~-
'n
>
<<
--'
:>
"'r"
'-'"
O'
I
C
..., ~
% -,
,
.0
'"
X
CO
'"
~
rn
"'X
"-
0=
"'~
CO
e-
....
N
"
c-
e,
"
"-
"
,"'-
.0
.,,,
"'0
c
o
o
o
'-' ,
'"
e .
z "-
<< I
-' OJ
X
'"
o
",e
..
"'
c.'u:
"
-z
0-
,,<
~
<<-
~("l
U..
-
>
'"
--'
:>
XM
'-'0-
O'
"
0-
.0
""
'.0
o
c
o
"
M
<<.-
"''''
rn
>
%
0<<
Ir-'
-:>
XM
1-(..'0-
X "
'"
:> I
o C.
'" ..
3 rn
I
r N
"
"'
-0
0-
C>
o
'"
0>
X
<<
"-
%
<<<<
..
"'
_rn
o
0%
'"
,- <
r
t
\. 'D,-2~
....
o
..
o
N
,
"
c, -
'"
I'; '"
('...0
c
e.
<<,..
~."
to
-
>
%
0<<
"'-'
-:>
:rM
t- '_', 0-
X O'
'"
:> I
CJ CL
Ir ..
3 rn
I
r '"
"
..
X
<<
..
-
-<r.
o
0%
" -
0) <
:<:
,',
-=
M
r--
o
..
o
N
e.
"
O'-
:.i~
...'"
- c'
c'
c.
c
o
<( ,~~
"'-
".
:>
<<
-'
:>
XM
(I) L' 0-
'" O'
W
:i
W
--'
'-'
'"
>
'"
'"
<<
'"
"
"
c;:: ~,.
.,
;;-
I
C
~
-,
,
"'
-0
0-
o
o
N
<<
"-
%
c-
"'
(,
r-:::t-
-c
c
c
<-
'"
o
.0
0-
-<-
"''''
u_
>
<<
-'
:>
X<",
'-'0-
0-
-
I
0-
W ~
~ '"
- ,
a::: t'1
"
>
:>
..
<<
"'~
C')Uj
<",
r-:.:.
o~
<:-
~ .'.
"t[;'
z"':
->
o
.,
If]
o
N
In'"
%--'
CO:>
-XM
to '=-' 0-
" "
W
'-' I
% ..
oew
""lrO
,
lIJ US-:-:
U) I- (~
:>rn
"''''
X:>
3-
,-
"''''
e-
_0
:>r'"
W
to
'"
'"
<<rn
'"
X
'"
0-0
c>-
0<
,,~
'-
c.
c-
c
c
~
u
~
<
<<
"-
%
I
.
':J
.
. c 0 c 0 c - '-
-
, C 0- . 0- 0- .' . ,
.. ::::- 0- 0-
a- a- c 0
~ ~ -' ~ . a-o- a-. I> 0- o-a- c'. C.. c ~
~ ~ - c C'~ 0 0:0 C';;O c.j C - C' 0
" c. c C- O c. C. r
C .. ~ o. '" 0 '0 c
c c 0 0 0 c
,'.
,~ N e,
::: c 0
c c ~ c
~. ~ .., ... 0 ~ . -L ~ .
0- 0- C i.I-, ~, < ~;
= <- <<- <<- <<- <<- <<- <<~ tr.<- 1(":<- In<t-
...~ ...'" t- (~ ..." ...~ ......, ....a- ... I- ,"~ -....~ ->- .{.
.. '" C' " V- V- Ol ~ Ol 'C'" l.~, ~ V.
- Ol- Ol- Ol_ Ol_ 0_ 0- 0-
:> " :> w" "''' W" w" ....4::- " " N~
<< << << <<
'" << << << 0<< 0< 0<< 0<< .<< .'" .<<
, ..J ..J ..J ......J ......J ......J ......J U..J U..J ,_, ..J
= ~ ~ ~ Ol~ Ol~ Ol~ Ol~ -~ -~ -~
",CO "'CO ",,... "CO "M ".., "M 3"'M 3'" M :J:Z: r.
'. ~ , a- '_' 0- QI,...'C!' Q'_' 0- Qr...;.l)'- ClL'o- I wa- , c' a- I <.-'1>
.- a- . 0 a- 0 a- 0 0- 0 l>- e 0- c 0- 0 0-
0 - 0 - c - c '.' U W
I I "- I "- I "- I "- I I I
. C C C L L L L ..J C ..J ..J C
., . ~ '.' ~ Z ~ Z .. Z .. Z .. ~ - ~ - ~
"- co " Lt", " Ol " Z ., W " W " W " W " 0 .., 0 .., C ,
z E I Z , , " I " I " I :> I I I I
, '- , c w '" " "' 0- "' 0- "' 0- W 0- , " ...J '" ..J ('"
,'; :::; '-' << ..J ..J ..J ..J :i ..J ..J "
;:, ~ '" "' w '" '" ~ "' w
"" .. .. 0 in " " ,
:J: '" '" << ... ... ... r- '" Ol ,
,~. '" 0 "' "' "' "' '" '" "'
, " "' "' M r- ... r- ... "' "' "
~ c. 0 0- 0- 0- 0- I> -
C 0 0 0 0
0 0 c 0 0 0 0 0 0 c
<. '., c, ,., '" N '" N N '" '" '"
c 0 << 0 ....
<< << << Ol
At > >- >- <<
"'''-' <<UJ <tL:..! <<:J: << < " .. .. " ,
...J C C 0
..J >- >- >- >- << ;;: '" '"
. ;: <: <: "- "- .. "- '" "- .. "- << ... "- "-
, " :> I;":::> -c 0- 3 0- " 0- " 1>" ".. "'<< ,,<<
.. , e. c oc OC 0" 0.. -0>- ..,.- -0'" ~
.., -> M'" c. '" C'..<:. t'4<t c-.....::: 0" 0- 0-
, '" " -O~ cc "'0 -00 -00 ..,0 "'Z "''' "'z
...::: c::; coo 0'" 0" c. e:.L "''' ",0
"- C', "- " .:::. '" ,
,n-,24 i, '- .
, _n__ ~ '- -~
.
. 0 c 0 CO
~ ~ 0" ~ ~ 0" 0" ~ ~ 0"
c- Co _ C-- 0-
0 ~ 0" ~ -c '-
.. ~ _ 0 _c- CO" 00" oc- O~ "''''(I- If''JC' l"".~
- ~':'" .. - <": -c" ...cr:; " c' 1I~ C' -c ....~ c 'l::
c c c " c c
-- ~ c_ '" c " c_ -'
. C 0 0 0 c
'" " "1
" " " '.' '"
z z z u 0" ~- U "C "C
- C <l c- C c
-c ~ c '" ~ ... ~ ~ ... n '""
v. c- t:'j L'"! C ~ In " n
Z'';': - '" < -. "'<< z"... <- <- In<- 11"')<_ <..- <:r-_ <.-
e i- {~ 01-..,. c~'" O~O" ..... ..'" _I-N -..'" ...... ...'" ...-C
-l'- -lJ:! -'" ....cr.: tn '" "'V, ...tn v- :r. v,
,-- ...- ...- ...- - 0_ 0_ - -
c;> <=> <:> <:> :> > "'> N> :> :> >
... .. ... to' Z Z
"" '" tn< tn< tn< < < -< -< z< 0< 0<
0 ...I ...I ...J ...J ...J U...J U...J -...J <<...J <<...J
0 l.:.J::-. ..n' w::> w::> ::> ::> -::> -::> ::> -::> -::> c
-. :l:r'; ';":'ZM \.:l=C"l i.:l:J:n %n %n 3%n 3%n w%n %n %n
c. '. 0- _WI> _'_'0- _'-'0- C&..'JD- "-UO" I UI> I UO" Z W~ I- L\~ i- ,_, t>-
O '" I> ... c- .. I> << ~ << I> 0 ... c: I> I> % e- % 0-
t" tn '" '" 0 0 - U U '" ..., CO
'"' I W I "' I W I to' to' t I < I ::> ::>
E ~ CO -" CO -" CO -" ...J L ...J L r c - CO
ro. ~ "- ~ "- . "- ~ '" '" ~ .. - .. .. CO "
~ ... -u. u. u. .., 0 r 0 r '" r 3 3
. /. , '" I ,.- I ,... I W W I I I , , I
O~ o~ c... 0'" ...J ...J ...J ...J < ... r " r '"
o -t< ,'~ Cl .0 (4 0",,'" 0..0 ..~ '-' to' ...J ...J '" N "
-.). U_ "'- U. << << w w << -, ...
-- '" << << - - % % C
<:r.1. ,,"' <V, <tn '" U '" '" '" % %
V,"" tn<l "'''' tn'" n n ., ... ...
<": -.c - ,0 -'" -'" ... ... In In In 0 C
I> 0" I> ... ... 00 00 0 ... ...
c 0 0 0 '" <<- <<- -
c 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
,', '" '" '" '" '" " z'" z'" '" N "
0 0
> >
'" z z
~. < <
U '"
< " < < .., < < < < << ""
" " " .., % " :z: " .. -
u. u. u. "- > > "- u. "- u.
... ... z ... z .. z ... z < "- " u. " z " z ... ... ...
- "-ILl) C',,(/) "'''' N:.n n3 n3 ...<< ...0: In'" -tn _tn
'" '" CO CO t"'" ..'" ""..., "'..., - 0 0
r-. z ,..z ....z ....z .< ..., NW N'" no oz Oz
"..... r'>- n_ n- l;"')O InO -...I -.... "'W ....- ....-
='<- e<:: o~ c< 0<< 0," ow ow ow .,,, CO"
,- r r "' ~ ... ... CO r r
. . a, Di~ &. _L , , C, h ft .
.
~.
~
~'
c
=-
'"'
u-
";'"J
5-'
":e~
~. ..
;:.
~
'.
~
#...
'-'
'.
'"
~
I:"'!
.~ ~r
o
"
0' -
co.
'"
o
. <C-
-~ ~
~ c,
c ~..
r. ;~
~
"
.."
,_, ..J
- '"
3XM
. ,_, C!"
c: ,.
c.'
.c
.
IL
t'O
c',
i"~
"'
~
v:-,
0'
<,
l>
o
o
N
..
IL
,. ; :~
.:<:<
- :..
l>
I>
00
o~ ,-,
. C
,.,
e
.. ..
L: <::
-1-..(;
..'"
0-
r~ :~
...
(..'...J
-'"
3:rM
I rJO-
e: l>
(..,
I
.c
~
IL
,
'"
,',
...J
o
,
iii
:r
'"
'"
."
0-
o
o
r-.
..
IL
r'-l>
"'''
N
_c,
C(:.
(~
I>
1>1>
e:JC
C
e,
'='
- ."
~ C
I:.~ 0
",..: 0::'
_....1>
"O'tJ'
0_
: ~ :.
I
.c
~
IL
I
"'
N
...
,,.:.....l
-'"
3:rn
IVI>
o 0-
V
I
-' .c
'"
o IL
I
...J "'
...J r~
W
:r
'"
'"
."
0-
o
o
N
"
IL
..-..::>
<Co<
"
_'::'J
0-
0:
l>
~"
- C.
c:'
~
~
-
....
UJ<-
Xt-(.j
~....,
..-
"'''
.";' <
...J
<.>'"
Z%.....
-'-'t"
Z I>
-
IL ,
W L
'" ~
'"
o ,
L' C"7
..
~
W
....
'"
..0
0-
o
o
N
IL
..;.
"
W
(".':S'
"'0
1>0:
("'",...J
C:...L:
(
I>
"'-
^
~l>
- c.~
o
o
'"
V
Z
'-'
'" '"
..0
~ 0-
w,,-
"'......
"''''
,,-
"';.
~<<
...J
<.>'"
Z:rM
_"-'0-
z "
IL I
W L
a: .
z:
o ,
(.., M
"
~
W
....
N
..
I>
o
o
N
IL
..;.
"
W
..-"cr.
0;;0
I>J.
(").-;
OL:.!
"
(>-
"'-
I>
..I>
-0
o
o
e.
~
N
<.>
Z
....
w..-
~......o
"''''
..-
z::>
.."
...J
<.>'"
ZXr":i
-VI>
Z 0-
IL I
W L
a: .
z:
o I
(.., M
..
~
w
....
'"
.-
0-
o
o
'"
....
,,:>
"
w
"''''
<CO
~5
o~
m-2lLJ6.
l>
<C-
I>
"I>
-0
e
e
o
u
Z
..
"
z ""
o
.... e
w""
"'.... 0
a::.l":
..-
z::>
." <<
~
<.>'"
Z:rM
-u"
'" I>
IL I
IL L
c: ..
z:
o ,
(.., M
..
~
w
....
'"
...
0-
o
o
N
IL
,,;.
"
W IL
Nt.":
"'0
1>'"
M....:
=-~.
'.
,
e
"
l>
c-
c
o
c
V
Z
..-
....'"
.....
-
:>
..
...J
'"
:rl")
~. 0-
I>
I
C
.
..,
I
M
'"
:r
o
'"
'"
...
I>
o
o
'"
....
III
..:r
IL IL
_0
c-
M....
e,o
0:::;
~
'.
C
I>
I>
o
o
c
C,
'"
....."
'"
:>
..
...J
'"
:rM
u"
I>
u
z
-
'"
:r
'"
c:
..
M
0-
o
'"
'"
....
ltl
..:r
IL
_0
'"
1")....
0=
oe:
"
t
,
c
~
,
M
..
M
I>
o
o
'"
IL
'.
~'
z
'"
;<;
o
'"
..:r
IL
_0
e
("".1-
CO
00
,.
o
"
e
r-,
""
....'"
....
:>
..
...J
'"
:rl")
uo-
"
-
c
..
..,
I
'"
..
M
0-
o
o
N
...
'"
c
IL
(,
8
.
.
..,
=-
...:-)
o
o
<
,
t,
'"
-<
<0
"
i-~
-.,"'...
l~. Ul
;;... u::
<': ('~ <.
C'-~
~. 0
c-'~
~<
Co
~
'.'
:;: ~:.
,-' ~. o::r
- :..'-
,-
..'1<
wS
,:.,: :rr-
,..
"
~
~
'"
'-'
'"
'"
..
.'
C
"
,
f.
"",:
::~-
0..-..(..
_U',
...-
<:>
.
",..
...J
"''''
.;",%n
-L.'O'"
... ..
'" -
'" 1
'" ~
"- D.
..
,
0-
D.
<t
1
..
o
V
"
...
M
-0
"
"
<<
'"
...
%
<t...
t, ...
...
'" %
OJ'"
C. ::
....0
"'...J
Cl <:
"
o
"
-',:::'"
c-
,.
c
"
<to
I' _
.,
:.
...
...J
:<'"
""" '"
o L"' t'-
" l>
g
'"
!"~
&oJ
..
o
...J
'"
'"
"
o
<<
'"
.
'"
...
<r,
OJ'"
-'"
-:>
0--
OJ"
..
",-
,,-.
"..
"~ C
C
C
"
"
....
...-<.
U'
:>
<t
...J
"''''
"'X'"
C '-' a
" l>
~
g
'"
.
"
,
..
....
'"
..
o
...J
'"
....
'"
o
o
<<
...
'"
.
...
...
cr.
OJ'"
-0:
-:>
l>_
" "
..
o
....
('~ .::.-
c
c'
c "
-:- il~.
IIi 0-
"..-
_i-"
..'"
c-
e,:>
....
V...J
-'"
3X'"
'V:>
o l>
" -
,
~
.
"
,
..
...J C
C -=.i
,
...J 0
...J '"
'"
X
'"
'"
....
'"
o
o
<<
...
...
N:>
OJ...
'.
-0
~ ~.
t
,
o
....
o
N
o
'"
"..
c: c
c
I:'
o
o
.. ..
Ie.
",,-
_.......c.
..cr.
c-
,,:>
....
<"'...J
-'"
2X'"
I {,...>tt-
o 0-
V
1
-' C
~ ..:;
,
-' "
...J n
'"
X
'"
'"
<<:>
......
<<
-Q
c~
"
"
0...
..0
~
<5
"
u
-0
o
'"
"
...-
.....
III
:>
...
-'
'"
OX'"
UU"
0-
-'
- ,
o ,.
..
,....."
i-O'
..._n
-.-
'"
X...
.....
"'.
-.,
0_
"'-
o
ZN
o
,.
%
'"
U
...
X '"
.. ...
'" %
..'"
.""
..'"
o~
c-
o
....
-
-
o
<<
,
Ji)..a. 7 <.
C
0-
-
0..
.."
"
c-
o
..
...-
i-'"
'"
:>
'"
-'
'"
oxn
uuo-
'"
-'
- ,
o >
c
,....."
"'0'
...-M
-.-
'"
x'"
.......
"'.
-.,
0-
"'-
o
%<<
o
>-
Z
...
<..'
...
X '"
.. ...
... %
..'"
It.l(~
"&oJ
--,
0,,"
-
-0
u
"
c
..
c
-..
"'c
'"
-'
...
......-
z.......,J
"''''
"'-
:>
'"
u...
"'-'
"''''
...:e",
>'>0-
u: '"
'"
'"
% C
~ .;
,
I- ..
~ N
'"
'"
:e
-'
'"
...-'
...
'"
-...
R~
f".c
C%
....
-0
-
-
o
<<
...
..
"
-..
.. c
c'
c'
c.
o
-' -0
'" "
.....-
z....~
"''''
"'-
:>
'"
v...
"'-'
"''''
...:eM
c' 0-
'" ..
'"
'" ,
% C
:f .;
,
I- ..
... N
'"
'"
X
-'
'"
"'-'
...
'"
-...
n'"
,.. =
"'''
0%
..
c
-"
0' !:
,
"
t.~.
f:'"
u
-' .
'"
i-"'_
z.....c:
"'to
"'-
:>
'"
v...
::>-'
"''''
i-X'"
1..'0-
'" 0-
'"
III
%
~ .:;
I
I- ..
... <<
'"
'"
:e
,
,
c
.
~
,
....
-0
-
....
-0
-
-
o
<<
o
<<
...
...J
'"
"'-'
...
'"
-...
nlll
....'"
nO)
0%
o
~
,
<
...
"
e
"
\..
.
. c c c
-
,. 0 0- 0 I> 0 I> 0- . .
'.' - (l -. ~~~ -< Cf':!- C~ -. C'
" c-: " 0' " 0' "
;.~ ..0- .. I> ... 0- I> I> I> " 0- ..,1> C'":.t;:" C
< -,- -~ -C. ~c' ~o ..'" -c, -:..'
Co 0 c .~ C- C C
C 0 C C 0 C c.
c c c. c 0 0 0
:r
., '"
~ .' " ,',
::-
, ,"" " ,. ~
, " u
~. C 0 0
~ ~ < -' .0 .., .. .., " ..,
.. < <: .. 0- I>
l-''-, '~. <( C '..:'<0 <- <:- <- <- <:- <:- <:- <-
'. - ~ - -~ - ~ " ~" ~ -c ~('.,j ~.. ...-<. ..." ~"
., " c:.:.:: Cll': .. u: ". '" '" '" '" .0
.=-.- W" ...- "'- "'- "'- - ...
.~ ::> J:::> r:> w:> w:> w:> :> :> :> :> :>
'" '" '"
"' *< '" <: <:< 0< 0< 0< "'< "'< "''' " <
::,... =' .....J ...-' ...~ .....J .....J LO -' "'..J "'-' ..J ..J
" ,,.,::> "''' to::> "'::> "'::> <" <::> <::> ::> ::>
~ - ....:rM _It"':' = 'J "'C"l "'.., 3"'''' 3"'''' 3"'" "'..-. "'..,
,_,t :~ ,_, (I- :>'-'0- 0'_"('1' Q ,_, 0- QL'D'- 1.'1> 1.'1> "' 0- '-'. 1.'1>
. ~ I> .,. 0 0- 0 0- 0 0- '" ,. <=- I>- '" 0- 0 l>
'" < 0 0 ... c: " " < ";'
~ ..J I ... I ... I "- , '-' I '-' I I.' , I
'- " '- ::> '- >- >. > U U U U U
< G ~ q Z q Z q Z .. ... .. ... .. ... .. W ~ W .. u.
>: ., " J: '-' z: UJ J: W J: !:! J: W 0 W C L:.: 0 ... ... 0 .
, , I , ::> , :> I W , W I UJ , UJ , , ,
. ..: ;~ "- .., "- .., UJ " UJ on on '" ... '" .... CL .... '" '" "-
'" .", ..J ..J ..J ... ... ... " "
~: :; < "' '" U '" U'l '" >- >- ~
'" ::> " ;:
f'-, to u: ... ... ... '" '" '" '" '"
c. c " ... " '" " '" on on .... ...
-< " on '0 o. .... ... -
C 0 0 0 0 0 ... ... ... " ...
- - - -
C- O ...0 ...0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
" " '-'C"" '-'" " " N N '" N '" N
.. 0 '" cr
- UJ UJ
... ~
.> Z Z
'< :' "'w "UJ ,,'" ,,0: ,,'" <: <: " " ..: < ..J <
" '-' ',' 0 0 "" ..J ..J
~ >- >- >- ::> ::>
" " Z ..J "- ..J ... "- ... "- "- "- ... < " < Z Z
a " l> < ',0 "'lO c.,;::. 03 03 ;::-.3 ,.,... coo-
- - , - '-' -~ -.. 1>-0 l>0 ." Co "'''' "'''' c,
~-; ,". " 0::_ CO..: "'..: 0<: 0" 0 " .., ..,
..c..C) ,,0 l.I-. I.-j~ ~ ~ "C "0 "'C t":Q CO"" c
'. C' ...:... ::' .-. " - -:;::.0:: C cr CC< ocr o~
, ". '" ..-.
,. :D,.28c I: L -' 0 &
08118193
D- 31 -i-.
TABLE OF CONTENTS ---
PAGE
REGULATION II. PERMITS - continued
RULE 20.3 Standards for Authority 10 ConS1l'Uct
Air Quality of Impact Analysis
20.4 Standards for Authority 10 ConS1l'Uct
Major Sources
20.5 Power Plants
20.6 Standards for Permit 10 Operate
Air Quality Analysis
20.7 Standards for Authority 10 ConS1l'Uct
ProleCtion of Class I Areas
20.8 Special Offset Requimnent Relating 10 Banking
21. Pennit Conditions
22. Denial of Applications
23. Further Information ~
24. Applications Deemed Denied
25. Appeals
26.0 Banking, General
26.1 Emission Reductions Calculations
26.2 Standards for Granting Banking of Emission Reductions
26.3 Transfer of Banked J:-",ietion Reductions
26.4. District Banking
26.5 MoraIorium on Banked J:.mi_'Iions
26.6 Public Cnmnv>nts; Banking
26.7 Ownership of Banked Reductions
26.8 Use of Equipment; B.nlrinl
26.9 Limited <adits; Banking
26.10 ReJisuy; lbnlri"l ---
....
.,-
.
-n-
D- 3;;L>
.
TARI~~ OF CnNT~NTS
RULE 40.
REGULATION m. FEES
42.
43.
44.
Permit Fees
Index of Fee Schedules
Hearing Board Fees
Fees for Acid DepositiOll Research
Technical Reporu. CIarps for
REGULATION IV. PROHIBITIONS
.
RULE 50.
50.1
5 1~
52.
52.1
53.
Visible EmissiOllS
NSPS cI: NESHAPS Visible Emissions Requirements
Nuisance
Paniculale Matter
~SPS and NESHAPS Particulate Matter Requirements
Specific Cootaminants
53.1 Scavenger Plants
53.2 NSPS and NESHAPS Specific Contaminants
Requirements
54. Dust and Fumes
54.1 NSPS and NESHAPS Dust and Fumes Requirements
58. Incinetator Burning
59. ContrOl ofWure Disposal Site Emissions
60. Cin:ummuion
61.1
.
61.2
-Hi-
D_- 33
PAGE
m-1
m-6
m-31
m-32
m-32
TABLE OF CONTENTS -.,
REGULATION IV. PROHIBITIONS - continued
RULE 61.3 Transfer of Volatilc Organic Compounds into
Stationary Storage Tanks
61.4 Transfer of Volatile Organic Compounds into
Vehicle Fuel Tanks
61.5 Visible Emission Standards for Vapor Conttol Systems
61.6 NSPS ~=nlS for Sunae of Volatilc
Organic unds
61.7 Spillage and Leakage of Vo1alile Organic Compounds
61.8 Certification Requirements for Vapor Conttol Equipment
61.9 Separation of Organic Compounds &om Water
62. SulflD' Content of Fuels
62.1 NSPS Requirements for Sulfur Content of Fuels
64. Reduction of Animal Matter -.,
66. Organic Solvents
67.0 Architectural Coatings
67.2 Dry aeaning Equipment Using Pettoleum-Based Solvent
67.3 . Coaling of Metal Parts and Products
67.4 Metal Container, Cosure and Coil Coaling Operations
67.5 Paper, Film and Fabric Coating Operations
67.6 Solvent Ceaninl Operations
67.7 0......... IDd Emulsified Asphalts
67.8 Dry ~.";y, FlCilities Using Halogenaled
Organic vents
67.9 Aerospace Coatinl Operuions
67.10 Kelp Procll,n"lllDd Bio-Polymer Manufacturing
Operations .
67.11 Wood Product Coating Operuions -.,
67.12 Polyester Resin Operations
-iv-
D-34
.
TARLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
REGULATION IV. PROHmlTlONS - continued
RULE 67.15 Plwmaceuticaland Cosmetic Manufacturing Operations
67.16 Gnphic Arts Operations
67.17 Storage of Malerials Containing Volatile Organic Compounds
67.18 Marine Coaling Operations
68. Fuel-Burning Equipmeru - Oxides of Nittoaen
68.1 NSPS Requirements for Oxides of Nitrogen from
Fucl-Burning Equipment
70. Orchard Heaters
71. Abrasive Blasting
REGULATION V. PROCEDURES BEFORE THE HEARING BOARD
. RULE 75. General V-I
75.1 NSPS " NESHAPS Variance Procedures V-I
97. Emergency Variance V-I
98. Breakdown Conditions: Emergency Variance V.2
REGULATION VI. BURNING CONTROL
RULE 101. Definitions VI.!
102. Open Fns, Western Section VI-2
103. Open Frres, Eastern Section VI-3
104. Further Exceptions VI-3
lOS. Burnin, Permits VI-4
106. Permit Dundon VI-4
107. Bumin. Hours VI-4
108. Burning Conditions VI-4
. 109. TempollU'J Suspension of Permits . . VI-6
110. Additional Burnin, Limitations VI-6
-v-
T)-35
TARLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE .........,
REGULATION VI. BURNING CONTROL - continued
111.
112.
Prior Nolification
Burning Report
VI-6
VI-6
REGULATION VD. VALIDITY AND EFFECTIVE DATE
RULE 140.
141.
Applicability
Effective Date
VU-l
VU-l
REGULATION VIII. SAN DIEGO AIR POLLUTION EMERGENCY PLAN
RULE 126. Applicability VIn-l
127. Episode Criteria Levels VID-l
128. Episode Declaration VIn-2
.......,
129. Episode Termination vm-2
130. Episode Actions VIn-3
131. Stationary Source Curtailment Plan VIn-7
132. Traffic AbalI:ment Plan vm-8
133. Schools VIn-lO
134. Source Inspection VIn-lO
135. Air Monitoring Stations VIn-lO
136. Inla'district and Inlerbasin Coordination Vm-lO
137. Eu-F''''Y ActiCln Cr-muee VIn-ll
138. ProcedUftlS and Plans VID-ll
REGULATION IX. PUBLIC RECORDS
RULE 175. Ocncral IX-I
176. InfcmlatiOll Supplied to District IX-2 .........,
177. Inspection of Pu~lic Records IX-2
-vi-
D- 3&J
1 ABLE OF CONTENTS
. PAGE
"
e
REGULATION X. STANDARDS OF PERFORMANCE FOR NEW
STATIONARY SOURCES - Index X-i
SUBPART A. General Provisions A-X-1
(SUBPARTS B. C. F, G, &: H are RESERVED)
D. Standards of Performance for Fossil Fuel-Fired
Steam Generators D-X-1
Da. Standards of Fetf",awtCe for E1eclric Utility Sleam Gene-
rating Units ConstrUCted After Sep1mnber 18,1978 Da-X-1
Db. Standards of Performance for I/>(I'lltrial-Couaug"ial-
Institutional Steam Generating Db-X-1
E. Standards of Performance for Incineraton E-X-1
I. Standards of Fetfuo" ,a...... for Aspbalt Concrete Plants I-X-1
1. Standards of Perf()Imllnce for Petroleum Refineries 1-X-1
. K. Standards ofPerformanc:e for SlOI'a&e Vessels for
Petroleum ~ds Construct After lune II, 1973
and Prior to y 19, 1978 K-X-1
Ka. Standards of Performance for S~ Vessels for
Petroleum Liquids Consll'UCtion May 18, 1978 Ka-X-l
Kb. Standards of Performance for Volatile ~c Uquid
SlOI'a&e Vessels (lllcluding Petroleum Liquid Storage
Vessels) for Which Constiuction, Reconstruction, or
ModificaIiOll Owm-nced IfIer luly 23, 1984 Kb-X-1
L, Standards of PerfQl'1'Nl""e for SecondaJy LeId Smelters L-X-1
M. Standards of ~fu.",ance for ~-y Brass and
Bronze Ingot Production Plants M-X-1
O. Standards of PerfClr"ftll...... for Sewage Treatment Plants O-X-1
DD. Standards of Pe.fot........... for Grain ElevalDn DO-X-1
BE. Standards ofPe.Co............ far SurflCe Coating
Metal Fumi1me EE-X-1
GG. Standards of Pe.r"'mance for Snorionvy Gas TurbiDes GO-X-1
. QQ. Standards ofPerfQl'1'Nl...... for tbe Grapbic Arts Industry: QQ-X-1
Publication RotograVIR Printing
-vii-
T)-37
TARLE OF CONTENTS -..
PAGE
REGULATION X.. continued
RR. Standards of Performance for Pressure Sensitive Tape
and Label Surface Coating Operations RR-X-l
SS. Standards of Performance for the Indusaial Surface
Coating Lqe App1iances SS-X-l
TT. Standards of Performance for Metal Coil Surface Coating IT-X-l
BBB. Standards of Performance for the Rubber Tire Manu-
facturing Industry BBB-X-l
FFF. Standards of Performance for Flexible Vinyl and
Urethane Coating and Printing FFF-X-l
In. Standards of Performance for Petroleum Dry Cleaners m-X-l
000. Standards of Performance for Nonmetallic Mineral
Processing Plants OOO-X-l
REGULATION XI. NATIONAL EMISSION STANDARDS FOR
JlAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANTS
(NESHAPS) - Index
SUBPART A.
C.
D.
E.
F.
M.
-..
XI-i
General Provisions
A-XI-l
C-XI-l
National Emission Standard for Beryllium
National Emission Standard for Beryllium
Rocket Motor Firing
National Emission Standard for Mercury
National Emission Standard for Vmyl Chloride
National Emission Standard for Asbestos
D-XI-l
E-XI-l
F-XI-I
M-XI-I
REGULATION XII. TOXIC AIR CONTAMINANTS
RULE 1201. Hexavalent OIromium - ~UIUl> PIatin, and
Chromic Acid Anodizing
RULE 1202. Hexavalent Chromium . Coolin, Towers
RULE 1203.
RULE 1204.
RULE 120.5.
Ethylene Oxide Sla'ilizers and Aerators
Surticing ApplicAliCl!!~for Serpentine Maleria1s Containing
Asbestos lit.-
Control of Dioxins Emissions from Medical Waste Incinerators
-..
-viii.
t)-3~
.
:.
..
~ -
,
f:: ;..
:r ,".
w~
- ,.
<.loc.-
I"':" ,~
o
i.l:.1!
-, I,
:;:..;:,
V, ~
,. 0
~o.
- =:=- ~
I.... _
:...u.... I ~
u..l.:: C
; ~...
. ~-: .!:
~
"
'"
c.
z "'
'"
"'
~.
'"
!?
Z
.
o
-
z
~
c
o
u.
,
....
c
z
"
"'
w
'"
r
::>
z
>
....
0-
r
o
....
o
w
"
:E
Z
c.
w
(;.
i.f'.:':"
0-"
:..~ ,....
c !
..J _,
.",
.
C-
"
c'
,"
"
.;:
-:::
c.
'"
~
co
~
<
,-
~
w
~
<:
In
o
0-
>;:
......J
-'"
UW
""
U I
0....
......
. '-'
<
-
'"
-
:>
<
....
:>
:I:
U
C':r"':-
0-0-
" 0-
co
"
"
o
:: '-'
<~
.'0
10
'"
~
"
w '-'
....ZZ
..0_
0_
,....'"
W<:I:
:>....0
In:>'"
"""
_w
,0:
0- ILl > I
-ClUJ-JW
o-CECL...J
~ (,., < J:;::'
o I%OU= ~(")
-Q IU I tDO"
I I o-_~ It:. D'
>> -UJI,UU _
..J...l C>- -LUL.'''"-<t% '
1l.i:L. - ll:-<t L
E.:r Z.......... Cl._
o 0 U) C ll: l.I.. <C[ ('~
L'r....' E 1% _ C I
I I Il.::>U 0
W~ -zcz f")1-
...."_, N t..J 00
- - Ie.. C 0
':' - S: .:- 1_
en
c
II It
'. ,
~<
-Q
C"O
WL;.:
........
<<-
00
"
",w
:>::>
UJ lJ:l
In In
..-
r
co
-0-
-0
C
C
C
'"
"'<
........
Zl!:
"'-
...,:>
Z<
0....
-::>
In"
_ r_.
....
o
U
W
....
Z
<
:>
o
<
.. '0
.-
Co..,
..-0
~:>,
M<OJ
(-,j
-00
O~
"-,
..
"
"
"
...
-0-
-0
C-
C
C
'"
W<
........
ZU'.
"'-
r....' :.>
z<
c....
-:>
"':I:
.... Co
....
...J
o
...'
w
...,
Z
..
:>
o
<
M~
0-0<
0--
M
0-
0-
-
.. ,
.
Co_
.. ...,
"':>,
M<o:
'I
-00
O~
i
0-
0<
-0-
MO
C
o
o
.;.:,
Z
0-
VI
z
-<
~....
woo
"'~
:>
....
Z<
W...J
r:>
0.:1:
;: ~l
'"
W
Z
<
<-
-
'"
W
E
..
<I.t...l"c
""C-
:0
.....-;:.-
Nlr'J
0:-.. C
-Z-
.,-
0' '"
r
'0-40
.
4j;
..,-.',;
4.'C~~-" - ."F-~"
..
0-
"
-..
MO
C
o
C
"
Z
:I:
U.
-
Z
-..
u.....
W"'
0: .'
:>
....
Z<
LU-:
E:>
0.:1:
-...'
:>
'"
w
Z
<
U
-
'"
w
r
..
M
..
0-
M
0-
0-
CLL. lot;
""C-
"0
......,-
NIn'
N 0
_Z_
.,-
.,..
r'
Ie-
.
o
..
'"
.,..
-00
"
C
o
<
....
In
-
:>
In..
"'...J
W::>
Z:I:
<u
W
...J
U
Z
w
:>
'"
o
..
.,
...
"'....
"'In
..
U.
"
0-
o-
M
"0-
~c
C-
o
C
<
....
In
-
:>
..
....
:>
:I:
U
In
Z
W
'"
:>
..
:I:
M
0-
0-
OM
"'0-
0-
>--
CUJ I .~
...J--
_ :::-0
....,-
"':>,
... 0-
->
-0<
., ....
o
, .
--
"0
..,-
,
(.
~
0-
e
..,
.. c'
.,.. :-.:
C
c-
o
..
....
'"
:>
<
....
:>
:I:
...'
Ul
Z
"-'
"
::>
..
:I:
OM
"'0-
0-
>--
c: W I U
....--
"""0
..-,-
..,:>,
r-- ..
->
-0..
.,....
C
{
4.
"
0-
~~
,,~ ~:
;;:
C'
<
....
"
"
z
0"
"'...J
-:>
:I:
!;:'-'
"
:>
c
'"
:0
r
..
:I:
<<<1M
""-
:...
...-,-0
_Ul I
o 0<
OZ'"
r--_
.,..
%:
M_
0-'"
0--
w
o
.,
.
.
,
c
"
"
::..-
lO
"'"
N;::'
<0
..- ":
"
'>-
j..-J
tf;(,
"10
"
C
c
.. <:
.- ...
-- " <r.
'.' ::> " >
=- " z z
- - ~ - .. - ...
C :; -'
"- 0; '" '"
- =' :r '" :r
-- 0 L 0 "
00- '"'
II: E
- <: ...
,- ... ...
"-
'-' V
L "- ..
" L' V
~ '" '"
:r .. "- ..
'"
M N
F' M__ M M
,- I> ~ I> ~ I> ~
"'l> - 10 0- - 100- -
.:'- - ,".- - ., --
<: L' , - ... L' , - '" " , -
.. - . - . .
- '5 '- ~ :t,
,.. ,'; 0- -< ... "" ... .., '"
'" , 0- .. I> '" , " '" ,
~ ... ..
;: - , ;:- ze. z c_
- r- -
- -- '" '" ..
<
c c '" '" '"
" " 0- " 0- 0- 0- 0-
1>- r- 0-- o-
r- .n ,., F. F-
1''' .." "I> "0- .." -C- o. 0- -"
" C -0:) NO NO """0 -C, -c -c
c 0 c 0 C. ..:.. c
.~ " 0 c' c C /5
'" ., '" '" 0
z
-
"-
'"
L
...
'"
..
3
:r '" cr '"
...... '" '" '" <: UJ<r: w<: w...
"'... ... CO'" CO'" CO'" ...... ...... ......
Olti Ih zm zm zm Zlr; z," Zt[;
"'- - _0- w- w- w-
> :' 3> 3:> 3:> V:> V:> u:>
:> 0 0 0
10<: <: ...'" .. <: ..'" z<: z<: z'"
-' :5 -' -' -' 0-' 0-' 0-'
,'" ..'" ..::> ..::> -::> -::> -'"
:r :r :r :r :r "':r ",:r to:r
~ '-' en ,_, >-<..' >-V >-u _L' - '-' -V
'" cr 10 Q Q -' -' -'
0 w 0 0 0 -' i5 -'
'"' z '" CO CO 0 0
'" <..' L' V
,- W 0 0 0
<: -' ... ... ... w w w
'" u ::> ::> ::> u L' u
:r .. .. .. z z z
.. '" .. '" '"
::> >- '" '" to :> :> :>
e:. IX IX IX IX 0 0 Q
'" '" .., .., .., '" '" '"
-
- N
M_ M- M- M M M M F,
1>" 1>- I> " I> I> I> I> a-
D - I> ~ 1>- l>- I>- I> l>- I>-
-I' -I' --
'" , - '" , '" '" , - '" , C, '" , '" , u '" , ~ '" ,
Q, . +> . u u- u u 0- u- U
CL:!"- u" >- ." >- .. "" >- .- ~o ..., ~-
"'''' 1.&!9..o <c-c "''''''' CCN 0- "'.., ION
l> , " -3~ -3 _3 ..'" , ..:> , ..:> ,
c 0 r~ MQ- ,",o- ne":" n<tt-. Met'" M",r-
- ,.-("', Cp-(. N<: N'" "~ < -
h. ~. 1>-'" 11"';0 ",,00 ""00 "'10 ..,'" "'10
'" '" o:lU: oJ a:: "'''' "'''' 0<< c.~
'-' '- "' c- c-
U.y.t
'-
'.
.
.
"._-~.._. -, "!I'!"l".'*'---'~-~'--. C'
Air Ponution Control District
County of San Diego
1992 Annual Report
D-4i-
'.
~
~
A Banner Year
The year 1992 was an important one for' air quality in San Diego. A new
Regional Air Quality Strategy was adopted; the county experienced less than 100
days of unhealthful air; the District is streamlining its process for issuing permits;
small businesses are being given a helping hand; and the compliance program is
being reviewed to better serve the business community.
Developed with extensive input from business and the community, the
comprehensive Strategy will cut smog-forming emissions by 163 tons a day by
the year 2000. It contains 32 new stationary source tactics to control emissions
from industrial, commercial and residential sources, and a commute travel
program to reduce the number of solo commuters.
Smog exceeded the state clean air standard only 97 days in 1992, compared
to 106 days in 1991, 139 in 1990, and 158 in 1989. Despite significant
increases in population and traffic, the overall air quality in the San Diego air
basin continued to improve, which indicates that industrial, motor vehicle, and
consumer product pollution control programs are working.
In response to concems that California's regulatory requirements are forcing
businesses out of Califomia and discouraging new businesses from locating here,
the District began a program to improve and streamline its permitting process.
Also, a Small Business Assistance Program was developed to help small business
owners comply,with District regulations. Finally, review of the compliance
program has already produced changes and more are expected.
But the solution to San Diego's air quality problem will not be accomplished
by governmental action alone. Part of the solution lies with you. Just by making
small changes in your daily activities, you can help clean up our air.
As you will read in this report, you do make a difference. Ry driving less,
watching the products you use, and conserving energy, you can contribute to a
promising future of clear, sunny skies.
.
.
~-'. /~
Brian P. Bilbray
Chairman
San Diego County Air Pollution Control Board
D - L!5
.
. PIlIIWtClNlaIl1llT
caul" OF III DIEla
.
TIN primary jiKru of the s.n Diego Air Pollution Control Distria (APeD)
is to rttiuce air pollution to ltvtls thtlt htlfJt been tStIIb/ished to protect public health.
Although reduced visibility may be the mD1't obvious tffict of air pollution, the health
problnns it causes are by far more serious.
Recent clinical studies show thtlt chronic exposure to polluted air imvmibly
reduces lung capacity, lowm stamina, and leaves people more vulnerable to long-
term respiratory problnns. Child,.", whose lungs are still dtvtloping, senior citizms,
and people suffiringfrom heart and lung disease are particularly vulntrable.
Air quality standards are set by both the federal Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) and the state Air Resources Board (ARB) based upon research that
Jqcuments harmfUl pollutant levels. APCD's primary mandate is to meet and
maintain these air quality standards as soon as possible.
Table of Contents
San Diego
Air Pollution Control Board
Diaae Jamb
Distria Z
Chairman's Message ....................................... 2
Air Quality in 1992........................................4
PollullIIIt SllIIIdards Index ...............................6
Transport vs. Local......................................... 7
Accomplishments in 1992 ..............................8
San Diego's Air Pollution Problem ................10
The Cold Start .............................................11
Ambient Air Quality SllIIIdards .....................12
Glossary of Air Pollution Terms ....................13
About the Disaia ........................................14
Citizen Involvement .....................................15
10 Ways to CIc:ar the Air ...............................15
Brian P. Bilbmy
Distria 1
Puada SIarer
DiItrict 3
~ L W'dllama
Distria 4
.
Joha M8d>ouId .
Distria 5
D- ~lP
.
.
.
~ 1992 Annual Report
~
Air~tyin 1992
San Diego County i:xpcricncallas than 100 days of
unhealthful air in 1992 with six Health Advisories and no
Stage 1 episodes.
Smog. measwed as ground-Icvd ozone. ~M the swe
dean air standard only 97 days in 1992. compared to 106
days in 1991; 139 in 1990; and 158 in 1989.
The swe standard is 9 pans per hundred million (pphm)
or 75 on the POUUWlt Standards Index (psn. A Health
Advisoty oc:cws when smog levels reach 15 pphm or 138 PSI.
and a Stage 1 is called when levels reach 20 pphm or 200 PSI.
The swe and fedaaI govanmenlS let dean air standards
to provide an adequare margin of sakty in plOleCting public
health. In setting its standards. California adopted striaer
standards than those used nationwide. The federal standard is
12 pphm or 100 PSI.
In 1992. San Diego ~ the federal ozone standard
19 days compared to 22 days in 1991. 39 in 1990. and 59 in
1989.
San Diego's continued steady improvement in air quality
can be attributed to a combination of indusuial and motor
San Diego's Air pollution Problem
Emission Sources
Reactive Hydrocarbons
Olber Mobile
11%
1iydroc:ubons + Oxides ofNi~ + Sun · SMOG
Weather. geography and a high concentration of automobile aaftic all conaib-
ute to San Diego's smog problem as illusuared above.
Emissions &om motor vehicles and indusuy react in the area's abundant
sunshine to create what is commonly called smog. These emissions (oxides of
nitrogen and hydroc:arbons) are generated in the populated coasraI plain and are
blown inland by the onshan: breeze to the Iowa- mountain slopes saerching from
Palomar Mountain south to the border.
These poUuWlts are then trapped against the Iowa- mountain slopes by a
remperaNte invasion layer that prevents them from rising. (A remperaNte
invasion is a layer ofwarm air lying above a layer of cooler air.) The inversion layer
is around 2.000 feet during the typical smog season - from May to October.
<4
..1)-!-\1
IDduotrial
C-.........
19%
.",
~ll(hL"'\
~I\m".
-'"
Raidential
Apicu1run1
22%
Oxides ofNiuogen
t". .....
( .'1,
""I. ,"
./' 1\",;...
, (.
IaoDaiaI
c....u-dol
1%
........tial
Apicu1runI
3%
1990 IltK Yeer EmiIIioo i_tory
Son Dicr;o IW Basin
.
.
vehiclepoUution conaols. However. more favorable meteOro-
logical conditions were largely responsible for the dramatic
improvement.
In 1992. there were fewer days with mild Santa Ana
winds. the main culprit responsible for aansporting poUution
here from Los Angeles.
Also. the San Diego Air Basin continued to benefit Iiom
the volcanic dust clouds resulting Iiom the Mount Pinatubo
volcano. The dust teduces the intensity of sunlight. which is
necessary for the photochemical formation of smog.
FinaUy. the lingering dfects of the El Nifio condition
created warmer water temperatureS in the Pacific Ocean that
~
~
reshaped weather patterns and increased imasion heights
resulting in better dispersion of air poUution.
This was the second saaigbt yar ~ San Diego County
did not exceed the state standard for carbon monoxide.
Carbon monoxide is an isolated problem limited to the
downrown alaS of San Diego and Escondido.
Slate standards were also met for niuogen dioxide. sulfur
dioxide. and lead. Slate standards were ~ for inhalable
particulates {PM,.>.
San Diego met &dera1 standards for carbon monoxide.
niuogen dioxide. sulfur dioxide. and lead; but it exe-l~ the
&dera1 oione standard.
Smog (Ozone)
NumbIr oIlleya tll.- 0I1lol1r1 tll.- oIlleya tll.- 01 Houra
ExcMdIng EleMdlng balding EIcIIdInt IIuImUIlIl-1lour
FedInI SlIncIIrd FIdIrII SWIdIrd .... SWIdIrd lIlalt SlIncIIrd IlMt 0I1111l1mum
StIIIon l-Hour 1-llour l-Hour l-Hour Col....b......, CoI_lb.....'
eor......tb.tlon CoI_.h.d&on CoI_d~"Ln ~_.., In ppIIm
> 12 Pl'hm > 12 P!'hm > I Pl'hm >1P!'hm
Alpine 12 30 81 271 17 AprtI26
Chula Vista 4 5 14 41 15 Sepl.23
DelMar 3 6 19 47 14 Sepl21
Downtown SO 1 1 8 17 13 Sepl.23
EICajon 4 12 27 65 18 AprtI26
Escondido 6 13 25 84 15 AprtI26
Keamy Mesa 6 10 15 42 16 AprI25
Oceansida 2 3 12 34 15 Sepl27
Otay Mesa 3 6 16 38 13 AprI25
BASINWIDE 19 51 96 . 17 AprI26
Smog (Ozone)
The chief component of smog. owne is San Diego's most
persistent air quality problem. It is formed when hydrocar-
bons and oxides of niaogen react in the presence of sunlight.
At the locations 1isted on the chart above. the Air PoUu-
tion Conaol District monitors owne at nine monitoring
. stations. Air poUution aansported Iiom Los Angeles is the
primary cause of elevated smog levels reported at the coastal
monitoring stations while smog along the lower mountain
slopes reported at Alpine is usuaUy attributed to locaUy-
generated poUution.
'D-4<g
The Alpine monitoring station recorded the most days in
1992 when owne levds ~..l the air quality standards in
the county.
Short-term exposure to smog for an hour or twO can add
_ to the body. It is a strong irritant that can cause
consaiction of the airways. forcing the respiratoty system to
work harder in order to provide oxygen.
Ouonic exposure to smog can reduce lung capacity. lower
stamina. and leave people more vulnerable to long-term
respiratoty problems. Smog is ~.lIy hatmful for children.
Ienior citizens. and thoee who suffu Iiom heart or lung diseate.
5
~ 1992 Annual Report
~
NII"oqen OloXldp
.
_01- ........
MnlIII a... I. .... ,_ - 01........
...... -.. ........ - ........ C "A.. C"- ......
'''''' I_
....... In .....
Alpine 1.5 a 8 Ftb.21
CIIula Villa 22 a 15 JIll. 23
0cMran so 2.7 a 14 Jln.23
e Cajon 2.7 a 11 SeIil28
EIconcido 2.6 a 13 Jln.23
KIImy Mesa 2.4 a 14 JIn. 23
0cunsid8 2.4 a 18 JIn. 30
0Iay Mesa 2.2 a 13 Oct. 7
.
;
.
Carbon Monoxide
The byprodua ofincomplea: combw-
Don primarily from motor vehicle
exhaust, carbon monoxide is hannfuI
because it restricts the blood's ability to
carry oxygen.
The highest concentrations are round
in areas with congested or high volumes
of traffic and during the winter months.
There were no violations of the state or
federa1 carbon monoxide standards in
1992.
. Strtet '-'-umi1lf
m~s.mDi4p
Nitrogen Dioxide
The brown haze seen in the San Diego
sky1ine on cold momingl is due ID niaogen
dioxide. It is a byprodua of all combustion
and is emitud from sowces 5lICh as molDr
vehides, industria1 boilas and heatcts.
It is one of the pollutantS known
paically as oxides of niaogen. a primary
ingredient in the ronnation of smog.
An irriwing gas. niaogen dioxide may
increase the susceptibility ID infection and
may consuia the airways of asthmatics.
Neither the federa1 nor the state standard
ror niaogen dioxide was violated in 1992.
Carbon Monoxide
_oIDoro _oIDoro
I. -. I. ~II"'" ........ - 01........
...... -.. ........ - ........ _a... _a...
_a... _a-. c-..._~",
CoI~~"" III oL~ Inpplll c._~"'~
.'ppm .u ppm
CIIula Villa a 0 4.0 JIlL 22
Curbside' 0 0 7.0 JIlL 23
Downtown so 0 0 7.0 Jon. 23
EI Cajon 0 0 5.0 Jon. 24
Eac:ondido 0 0 7.0 Jon. 24
KIImy Mesa 0 0 3.0 Jon. 10
0cNnIide 0 a 4.0 Jon. 30
oIay Mesa 0 0 5.0 JIlL 22
PartlCulilte Mc1t!pr (pM 10)
- - --.......
.... .J_ e..-.4"- -- D*fIIU . -
- -- -- ,. pg/W13 - .......
. pg/W13 10 pg/W13 --
. pg/W13
ClIuIa VIotIl III ~ 54 Jon. 25
Dowt_ so 33 31 87 Jln.l
EI Cajon 3lI 33 87 Doc. 2
EIcondidO 34 32 70 _.20
Keemy MIla III 28 57 Jon. 25
~ 28 28 47 SIpl ~
6
'D-L\9
Particulate Matter (pM1J
Akbougb all airborne partidcs can pose
a pocmtial bcakh problem. the greatest
cona:m is fur rniaoscopic. invisible
partida !as than 10 microns in diameter
wbich are known as PMlO. The _....un
ror rbae partides is based on their ability to
bypus the body's nanual filtering system.
I'articuI= ~ may be man-made or
nanual subsal- and may come from a
.
varictypfindusaial and mobile sources.
They may be emitted direc:dy or IOrmed in
the air by tranSformations of gases.
Even though all partidc:s may cause a
health problem. they &a diffi:rent pans
of the.respiratory aact depending on their
size. Panicles 2.5 to 10 miaons in diameter
tend to coIIca jft the upper pottion of the
respiratory system. while those 2.5 miaons
and smaller can infiltrate deeper portions of
the lung and remain there longer. increas-
ing the risks oflong-term disease.
In 1992. state standards lOr PM,. were
exceeded
~
~
lc^d
-- --
- __A_ -,~
c.~"AlI c._.A.,
.UJllIIm3 .UJllIIm3
DownIown SO .03 .02
EI Cajon .02 .02
Lead
At least 90% of lead in the air
lXlmes from automobile exhaust. As
. the use ofleade<l gasoline decreases,
lead Ievds steadily decline. Both the
kderal and state standards lOr lead
were met in 1992.
Sulfur DloKldc
_oIDo,1
.... AWIIlII I - ow _,-
- ........ ...01_
...... - ........ ........ AWIIlII CII_.1.A.. t ~.
...... Ct.._.... 10_
.1.....
CIIUIa VlSla 0.2 0 12 Aug. 18
~SD 0.4 0 9 ApI 19
E1Clljon 0.2 0 4 ~12
EIcondIdo D.3 0 9 ~23
KIImy ..... 0.4 0 8 SIpl25
0ceInside 0.1 0 2 JIn.3
OIly Mesa 0.2 0 8 Aug. 21
Sulfur Dioxide
Sulfur dioxide is not a problem in
San Diego because the lXlunry does
not have the heavy manufacturing
associated with this pollutant.
Slate and kderal standards were
not ell'~"" in 1992.
Pollutant Standards Index
Many people. especially those who suffi:r from illnesses
aggravated byairpollution. need accurate and easily undet-
standable infOrmationaboutdaily 1eveI.s. This infOrmation
allows them to modify their activities when air pollution
Ievds are high.
One way of lXlnveying air pollution infOrmation is to
tq)On the lXlncmtnrion of each pollutant. However.
diffi:rent pollutants &a health at clillemtt lXlncmtra-
tions; thus anyone wanting to act on the infOrmation must
IUllClDber several clillemtt letS of numbers.
The PollUtant Standards Index (PSO was developed by
the Environmental ProuaionAfFncy (EPA) to avoid this
problem by relating similar degrees of health dfcas to a
uniform numerical scale that is based on aaual pollutant
lXlncentrations. This c:han shows how intervals on the PSI
scale relate to the potential health dfcas of ozone at the
measured lXlncmtrarlons.
r
I
I
~
I
I
I
..
D-50
Hazardous
over 300
Very
Unhealthful
200-299
~,
Unh68fthfUf .
101-199
'}",1tJlt~
.:~~.
Moderate
51-100
Good
0-50
..275. Staae II Alert .
(31 _Pit.........)
EwIyone &hoUd IIIIIIin iIdocn.
~ . Stllae I Alert
~_perlilndNd _I
GInIrIl !u.Il!c. &hoUd Mid strInullUS
cUdooI iIl:Me8.
138 . HMIth AdvIeory
"(11 _per........-l
AlhlIlI8 &hoUd Mid......
cUdooIlCtivIIlIS.
,,100 . ......... StandIIrd
(12 _per........-l
"75 . &taW Stallderd .
It _per........-)
SenIIII\ie -- &hoUd IIIduce
Blr8RloUI""'~ IClIvIIiIS.
7
~ 1992 Annual Report
~
Smog Trends and Geographical Sources
A "aanspon day" typic:aIly oa:ws during mild SanClAna
-mer amditions when polluted air from the Los Angdes
buin is pushed out CMr me oc:ean and carried south. This
polluted air is chen blOlJlbt onshore by San Diego's nanuaIly
oa:uring sea breeze. EIevaIalIcvds ate typic:aIly 6nt n:cordcd
at the mastal monitoring sations of Oceanside or Del Mar.
In a "1oca1 day", smog Icvds ate elevated along me inland
lowu mounlain sIopcs. This indicaIes that the smog is caused
primarily by Ioca1 pollution genermd in the legion's hcavi1y
populated mastal mmmuni-
ties and blown inland by me
onshore breeze. The prob-
lem is fUrther inlalSilied by
me presence of a tempera-
ture invasion Iaya' that traps
polluClDts and prevents !hem
fiomrising.
Data show that IocaI1y
generated smog is now a
more significant f.actor on
days when me air violates
IlatC standards. mmpared to
me early 1980's when aans-
ported pollution from me
Los Angdes buin was the
main source of San Diego's
smog. In 1992, Ioca1
pollution was responsible for
59% of me days San Diego
ew-W the _ andard
(57 of me 97 days); in 1980,
it was responsible for only
32% (53 out of167 days).
Tbae twO pphs show
the number of days San
Diego ~ ,1M the _ and
WcraI dean air andards
",-!tit me mIumns for each
.,.. fUrther broIrm clown to
show "1oca1" source days and
"uansport" days.
The toW number of days
~~;"8 the andards \Or
each .,.. appears at the top
of each mlumn.
More than half of the days when San Diego exoeecll-<l -
smog andards in 1992 were caused by smog perated in
San Diego.
After years of macking long-term pollution mncenaation
paaems. the Air pollution Conaol Distria can determine
where smog is being generated. District monitoring staff
uaIyze pollution Icvds to classify each day as a "local day" or
a "uansport day" depending on me geographical sowce of
me polluted air.
Number of Days F...--li1'\g Federal <lean Air SnnA"rd,
(> 12 pplua>
100
80
. 80
60 (M)
40
10
0
1980 1981 1981 1983 1984 1985 1986
1987 1988 1989 1990 1991 1991
. Local Days 0 Transport Days
Number of Days F...--ling S1ate <lean Air Standard
(> 9 ppIua)
167
160
.
101
tu"l
\31
117
11
100
1910 1911' 1982
1913 1984
1985 1986 .911
1918 1989
8
n-.5\
.
Trip Reduction
A proposed employer mp reduction regulation, Regula-
tion XIllwas devdop.d by the Disaia to implement the
lUgional Air ~ty Sumgy dw was adopted by the Air
. Pollution Conuol BoaId in June.
It is signiDcantly less suingent than carIier versions and
rdIects ntarIy two y=s of cIiscussions, workshops. and
emnsive ~ from the business CXImmunity in order to
have the Icost adverse d&a on the San Diego region.
1) - 52
~
~
Permit Streamlining
SmamIincd permit procedures are being developed to
improve the Disaia's permitting process to benefit local
businesses and stiI1 meet state and federal air quality require-
ments.
The Disaia's fim step was to seek CXImments from
regulated businesses. More than 300 responded. The most
CXImmon complaint was that it took too long to get a permiL
Permit streamlining procedures developed so far include
pre-application equipment approvals. over-~unter city
deaner CXInsuuction permits, pre-application meetings,
improved permit application forms, and inaeased coordina-
tion with Disaier CXImpliance staff inspections. The Disma
is also meeting regularly with an industry work group to
fiuther improve the permit system.
(C'OntinunJ D1I pa~ 10)
1,400
589
1,218
1,877
442
87
1,380
511
958,693
231
$512,369
5,400
Yearly Activity *
PennitApplialions
Authori1ies to Coasttuct
Pamiu to Operate.
F.J1&i-iDg EwluatioDs
Soun:a Immtoried
AirTca:iaAJ ..-u
. Nocica ofVJOIaDon
Complain 1m . .
t ~.wtanns
Monitoring Houn
Source TeID
Paudtia CoIJ-..d
Pcnons AttmcIcd
District p_tations
. Figures from Fiscal Yeu 1991-1992
9
. ~ 1992 Annual Report
~.
.
.
(t.imtimIeJ f"'m JNlU 9)
NDl Attainment
The Ca1ifornia Air Raourc.es Board (ARB) claignaad San
Diego County as atl2ining the stare nitrogen dioxide (N021
IWlClard.
The am one-hour sandard ror N02 (0.25 para per
million) has not been ~ in the CXlW1ty fOr the put fOur
years (1989-1992). The kdml annual N02 sandard (0.5
para per million) was attained in 1981.
ARB also claignaad the region as nonmainment-
uansitional ror carbon monoxide (CO). The Slate CO
sandard (9 para per million) was ~..l once in 1990 but
was nor e-.--l..l in 1991 or 1992.
Small Business Assistance
A Small Business Assis1ance program got undetway with
an open meeting in October to receive comments from
businesses with less than 100 employees on how the program
shou1d be str\ICtW'Cd.
An independent ombudsman was suggested to assist srna1l
businesses with understanding District qularions and
requirements, submitting permit applications, 6ling variance
petitions, and resolving problems Ot disapements with the
Distria.
The Distria is also considering a total quality manage-
ment program ror Distria employ=; to better serve permit
applicants in a more positive and helpfUl manner.
TIde V Federal Operating Pennits
The 1990 amendments to the kdml Clean Air Act
required stare and loca1 agencies to devdop a program to issue
kdml operarlng permits fOr major sources of air contami-
DanIS. These are known as Tide V permits. UnfOrtunately,
this program will add paperwork and delays to the existing
permit program but will have no substantive air quality
benefits.
In 1992. the Environmental PI'Olection Agency (EPA)
issued ia final requiremena fOr am and loca1 Tide V permit
programs. The District has been oaM:Iy involwd with the
Ca1ifornia Air Pollution Control 0IIicers Associ~rinl\
(CAPCOA), other air districts. the Ca1ifornia Air Raowces
Board. and EP A in an drort to resoM: c;8"ific2nt program
issues with EPA. The District has also Conned a working
poll!' of representatives from loca1 industries to assist in the
ckvdopment of rules and procedurc:s to implement Tide V.
10
...""1"'"\ 1"\.-;:2,
Compliance
During 1992, the Disuia inaascd drora to assist srna1l
business in complying with District quIarions duough a
IlIWte specific compliance assistancz program.
Compliance assiSlance training sessions were held with
specific business scaon such as automotive tdinishen,
teMa:s Slations, and the military. District safF inaascd
imoM:ment in reaching and speaking at fonna1 dasses in air
pollution control at loca1 colleges and uMasities. Environ-
mental compliance safF from loc:a1 businesses rotmed a
significant pat! of the audiences.
Compliance advisories were also initiated to help loca1
businesses comply with new Distria qularions. These
summaries of new requiremena and their impact are sent to
affi:aed businesses and other inrerested patties prior to a
quIarion's implementation.
Toxic Air Contaminants
In January, the District released its 11m annual report
required by the am Air T oxics InfOrmation and Assessment
Act (AB2588).
The air taxies program is designed to identify and quantify
emissions of potentially toXic air contaminants from motor
~ and other mobile soun:es, indusay, area sources
(household produCts, pesticides. etc.) and natural sources
such as wi1dfires and determine if the source poses a signifi-
cant risk to public health.
The Distria completed plans and inventories ror 100
&ci1ities, reviewed and rorwarded about 50 health risk
assessments to the stare Office ofH~th Hazard Assessment,
and convened a Risk Communication working group.
Rule Development
The fOUowing new rules and rule changes were developed
in 1992:
. Rmsed District Rule 11, "Exemptions from Permit
Requirements", to c1arify permit emnptions.
. Adopted a new rule go.aning swfacing applications ror
serpentine materials containing osbestoc to regulate
asbeSliOf emissions from such operations.
. DeYdoped a new rule implementing an emissions Slate-
ment program required by the Environmental Protection
}.pcy.
. Dadoped new rules to control emissions from medial
_ incineraton and paint manu&auring operations.
.
. Proposed moisions to the District's New Source Rmew
rules to meet &deral and state IIllJWremenlll, met with an
indusay focus group, and hdd a public workshop.
Other .Aca>mplishments
During 1992. the Disuia also:
. Expedited the variance procedures for small business. A
designated Disuia saff member is now available on a fiill-
time basis to provide any necessary assis1lInce and answer
all questions associated with this process.
. Installed a new data acquisition system to improve the
mUection of air quality dara.
. Assisted with the operation and maintenana: of a moni-
toring station in Tijuana under a grant fiom the Environ-
menw Protection Agency.
. Validated the Regional Air Quality Model "base ase" that
wiD be used to evaluate the Regional Air Quality Strategy,
. Began evaluation of areas where inspection activities of the
Disuia, Hazardous Materia1s Management Division of
~
~
the County's Health Services Department, and Weighlll
and Measures of the County's Department of AgriaJItwel
Weighlll and Measwa could be coordinated.
. Continued implementation of Rules 1201 and 1203, roxic
air mntaminant mnuol measures Cot chrome pIatingI
anodizing operations and ethylene oxide Slailizers.
. Participated in the review of rules to reguIue anissions of
air mntaminanlll fiom a solid _landfill proposed for
the Campo Indian Raervation. Disuia engineers re-
viewed and commented on the permit application for the
landfill project.
. Continued dcve10pment of a rule to mnuol NOx
emissions fiom boilers at San Diego Gas & EJearic's
(SDG/kE) power planlll.
. Authorized the mnmuction and tracked the progress of a
NOx emissions mnuol demonstration project for the Unit
#2 boilet at SDG/kE's Encina powerplant.
. Identified additional major sources ofNOx anissions
lIllJuired by the Environmenw Protection Agency to
implement ~nably Available Control Technology.
Swnmary of Major Requirements
Federal Oean Air Aa of 1990
Both the state and kderal govmunenlll have enacted
legislation to redua: air poUution and IIllJWre the foUowing:
.
California Oean Air Aa of 1988
.,. A 5% annual reduction in hydrocarbons and oxides of
nitrogen anissions fiom 1987 until standards are
attained. If this 5% reduction cannot be obtained,
every &:asible measure must be implemented.
.,. Use of the Best Available Retrofit Conuol Technology
<BARen for existing stationary soura:s.
.,. Permitting progtam lIllJuiring (l) Best Available
Conuol Technology <Men on new and modified
equipment which increases emissions of nonaaainment
poUutanlll or precursors by 10 or more pounds per day,
and (2) emissions olliets for all inaeases in emissions of
nonaaainment poUutanlll or precunon at soura:s with
emissions of nonmainment poUutanlll or precursors of
10 or more tons per yeat.
.,. Transportation mnuol measures (TCM's) to achieve
an average of 1.5 persons per passenger vehide during
wcckday oommute hours by 1999.
.,. Major souro: threshold of25 or more tons per yeat of
nonaaainment poUutanlll or precursors.
.,. ~nably Available Control Technology (RAen on
all major soura:s of nonaaainment poUutanlll or
precursors.
.,. Permitting program Cot new or modified major soura:s .
of nonmainment poUutanlll or precunon 1IllJuiring: (l)
Lowest Achievable Control Technology (U.ER) and
(2) emissions olliets at a ratio of 1.3 to 1 to mmpensare
Cot the increased emissions fiom the new or modified
source.
.,. TCM's to offset emissions fiom increased vehide miles
aavded or number of ~de aips.
.,. Measwa to IIllJWre employers of 100 or more to
inaase average ~ 0CCl1p"'1C)' in amunuter aips
bmwen home and the worlcplace during pealt travel
periods by at least 25%.
.,. Enhanced motor ~de inspection and maintenana:
program.
.,. Clean IUd ~de program.
11
D- :54
.
~ 1992 Annual Report
~
t
Ambient Air Quality Standards
..........1 A.'" ""I n- c .......... ........ ........, If Hilt..., Method
o...ao I Hour 0.09 ppm 0 0.12 ppm Some u Primary Ethylene
(235 ...,mJ) 0lemllumines<:enCc
8 Hour 9.oppm _~ve 9ppm
Cuboa (10 msfmJ) (10 msfmJ) _.Dispenive
MoaoDde 20ppm -St-l>_ 35ppm . _ Specuucopy
I Hour (NDIR) (NOIR)
(23 msfmJ) (40 msfmJ)
NJtro&en ADnual A_ 0 0.053 ppm
Ou Phue (100 11I!m3) Some u Primary Gu Phue
DIollide 1 Hour 0.25 ppm Olemll_ - Clemil_
(470 11I!m3) .
Annual A_ 0 SO"""3
(0.03 ppm) 0
24 Hour 0.04 ppm 365 ""m3
Sulfur (105 ~slmJ) U\lravWle< (0.14 ppm) .
DIolIide f1uomcen<e 1300 ~slm3 PInrosaniline
3Hour - .
(0.5 ppm)
1 Hour 0.25 ppm
(655111!m3) . .
SaspeDded Annual M... 3O...,mJ Size Selective 5O...,m3
PartlcuIate Malter InIetHish 0 Hish Volume
(PM 10) 24 Hour 5O...,mJ Volume SampI<r 150 I1I!m3 Samplins
Sulfates 24 Hour 25 ~slmJ 1)arbidimeui.c
Barium Sulfate 0 0 -
30 Day A...... 1.5...,mJ 0 .
Lad AIomic Ab1orpIion Atomic Absorption
CalelldIr Quut<r 0 1.5~slmJ Some u Primary
Hyd....... SuJIIde 1 Hour O.ot ppm Cadmium Hydroxide
(42...,mJ) SInCWl . . -
Vinyl Chloride 24 Hour 0.010 ppm TedIar Bas CoIIcetiOll.
(ChIoroetheae) (26111!m3) Gu~y 0 . .
VIoIblIIIy ID JUfftc_......1O produce. utinctioa
Rod....... I ()boorveIioo coeft\denl 010.23 pot Ili_....."..,;cla
......lIIive~<~.t. .. , 0 0
PutIdeo ~ widl ARB Mechod V.
CaUfomIa 8taDdarda
.
Nota:
.
1. Calilomiaandarda. ocher cban CllIDftCo carbon 1Il1lnr ....- sulfurdioaiclc (1 bout).
ai....... dioxide, ond ponicuWo ....... (PM.,). Oft....... dw Oft ....... be
ecplOIod Of cxcoedcd. The....... cubon m'7'" ~.o ...uur dioxide (I hour).
ai....... dioxide. ond ponicuWo ma_ (PM,,) aandarda Oft....... be cxcoedcd.
2. NllliorW andarda. _...... orono ond m- baed 011 ........ __ Of
annual pomcuic rneans.1ft DOC .. be ao:ecIed rDOIC man once Il year. The
orono orandud is oaained when doe apeaed number of cia,. per c:IIondot ya<
wida malmwn bowIynmp ~" abow aandard iI-....I. or leD
...... .... ...-
3. eo.a~~ld;lI n ~ 6rR in units in which it... pnxaulpecl. EquivUenr
"'0"'" m puon_ Oft baed upon a...m.noe '"'"I'<'""""of25"C ond a
...m.noe.......... of760 mm ofmacwy. AII_ of air quality Oft...
be CXlrIOCUd... a.......... '"'"I'<'""""of2S"C ond a.................... of760
mm of _ (1,013.2 millibor). Ppm in dUolablo.......... ppm by volume or
micnHnoIa of poilu...., per mole of po.
4. Any equMlcnt procod... dw can be __ ... doe.." < '.. of doe Air
__ Baud ... pv. equMlcnt...wa at or _ doe IneI of doe air quality
orandud may be uood. .
12
D-et5
National 8taDdarda
S. NllliorW Primary S1andu<b: The Iewb of air quality........,.. with an
~ nwJin of""', ... pn>COCt doe public hcakh. Eoch..... mUSt
aaain doe primatr aandarda _ a opodfied......... of yan oIiet that
....', implerMn...... plan is __ by doe _al P....mon
ApKy (E1'A). .
6. NllliorW s-aduy S1andu<b: The...... of air quality ........,.... pnxoct
doe public...... tiom any -.. Of ",0( 'r .... adwnc cI&ca of a
........ Eadl.... _ aaain doe -ury aandarda within a
"-w.&o ..... ..... doe implerMn...... plan is __ by doe ErA.
7. JWoronco onod>ocI.. dacribod by doe ErA: An 'equMlcnt onod>ocI' of
-' may be """ bu'_..... a ..........t ..IatiorWUp... ....
.......... onod>ocI" ond mUM be __ by die ErA.
8. PmoiIins visibility is defined.. doe ....- visibility dw is attained Of
awpuood arowuI at ..... half of doe horiaon circle but nor necouari1y in
COIlOntaDUlleClOr.
9. The........ PM,,"" orandud is baed on doe.....,.me ..... of 011
...,....a...ua......durins....ya<. The.....oal PM"nllliorWorandud is
baed 011 avenain8 doe quamrIy ariduDcti< .......
.
~
~
Glossary of Air Ponution Tenns
AaD DEPOSl'IlON-The conversion of su1fur oxide and
niaogen oxide emissions into acidic compounds that pRCipi-
we in r.ain, snow, 109, or dry particles.
AIR MONlTORlNG-Sampling and mcosuring pollutants
praent in the aanosphere.
AIR BASJN-An area with common and distinctive
meteOrological and geographialli:atures. The borden of the
San Diego Air Basin are the boundaries of San Diego
County.
AIR RESOURCES BOARD (ARB) r.lifornia's state
agency responsible for dean air programs. The ARB controls
mobile pollution sources but ~ its authority over
statioruuy sources (such as factories) to local air quality
disuicts.
AMBIENT AIR-Outside air.
. ATIAINMENT-Lep recognition that an area meets
standards for a particular pollutant.
BACT-Best Available Control Technology.
EMISSION INVENTORY-A listing, by source, of
pollutants emirted into a community's aanosphere in
amounts (commonly tons) per day or year.
ENVIRONMENTAL PR0TECI10N AGENCY
(ErA)- The federa1 agency concerned with air quality.
HYDROCARBONS-Any of a VlISt f.unily of compounds
containing carbon and hydrogen in various combinations,
found especially in solvents and fuels. Most of the hydrocar-
bon compounds are major air pollutants. They may be active
participants in the photoehemial process.
INVERSION-A layer of warm air in the aanosphere that
lies over a layer of cooler air, aapping pollutants.
LAER-1.oI.wst Achievoble Emission Rate.
MIXING HEIGHT-Distance nom the ground to the top
of the mixed layer of the aanosphere; a nxasure of the
wlume of air awilable to dilute pollutants.
NrI'ROGEN OXIDPS (N0s)-Gases formed primarily
. &om aanospheric niaogen and oxygen when combustion
mRs place, particularly under conditions ofhigh tempera-
tUre.
OFFSET -An emission reduction that compensates for an
emission inaase.
OZONE lAYER-A naauaI1y oc:aming layer oI ozone
seven to 30 miles above the earth's sur&ce in the stratoSphere.
The ozone layer 61ters out the sun's harmfW ulaavioler
ndiation. It is not afRcted by the ozone in photoehemial
smog found in the lower aanosphere. There is no mixing
between ozone at ground levd and ozone in the upper
aanosphae.
PHOTOCHEMICAL--Requiring the presence of sunligbt
for a chemia1 reaction.
POUUfANT STANDARDS INDEX (PSI)-Asystem of
reporting air pollution levels to the public by assigning them
a numerial value.
RISK ASSESSMENT-Evaluation of ~ health
impacts on a specific population.
SMOG-OriginaI1y an English term contracting .smoke"
and .1Og," it is used in California to describe the mixture of
pollutants primarily composed of ozone and oxidants.
TOPOGRAPHY-The configuration of a land surface,
including its relief and the position of its natural and man-
made IQtureS.
TOXIC-A substance that is poisonous or harmfW to
human health, plants or animals.
TRANSPORTATION CONTROL MFASURFS
(I'CM'I)-Any measure designed to reduce emissions nom
tranSportation such as cupooling. changing traffic 80w
patterns, or using mass uansit to improve air quality.
VOlA~ ORGANIC COMPOUND (VOC)-An
organic compound that tadily evaporates at nonnal tempera-
tures; some are smog-forming.
Units of Measurement
~ - cubic mecer.
mID millimeter. equal to 111,000 of a_.
11m - microm=r;equal1l1,OOO,OOOofa_.
11I& - miI1igIam; equal u"'I,OOO of a porn.
III - microgram; equal to 111,000,000 of a porn.
ppm _ pans per million; the number of pans of a
given poUUtallt in one million pans of air.
ppbm _ p8ftI per Iumdr<d miBion; die number of ~
of a given poUUtallt in one hundled million
pans of air.
13
D-5(P
~ 1992 Annual Report
~
About the Air Ponution Control District
The mission of me San Diego Air Pollution Conaol
Disaict is to protect me public from me advase impaas of
air poUution. This is aa:omplishcd through an inrcgratcd
monitoring. cngimcring and enmpliance operation that
IOaJSCS on ltChieving and maintaining air quality SW1dards.
.
.Administration
The San Diego County Board of Supervisors is me Air
Pollution Control Board for me San Diego Air Basin.
The Board adopa loa1 ru1es for ennaolling air poUution
and al1oc?~ funding for me Disaict's operations. The
Distria's funding comes &om me sua: and fedcral gcmm-
ments and from r- and penalties dwgeil to loa1 businesses
and industries.
Appointed by me Board. the Air pollution Conaol
0fIicer is responsible for all Disaia programs and represents
me Disaia before me Board.
The Air poUution Conaol Officer also analyzes and
participarcs in me formation of fedcral and sua: policy,
legislation and regulations on air quality.
.
Key Divisions
The Disaia's Monitoring aod T~nWl Services
division maintains nine monitoring sutions that enntinu-
ous1y recnrd poUution 1eveIs and meteOrological infonnation
in order to for=sr poDution 1eveIs. Otizens can call a smog
recnrding updated daily with maximum poDution 1eveIs by
sution and me foRcasted poUution 1eveIs for me next day.
The recnrding also provides advance notice if me poten-
tial for unhealthful smog 1eveIs or me possibility of a health
advisory or smog alert exists. In addition, a media hodine
n:cording provides poDution 1eveIs and forecasts for use on
radio and tdevision newscasts.
If a hea1th .dvisory is dedared. me m g<' is blOllllcast to
me media on me County's Emapncy Lifeline NetWOrk.
School disaicts and cities are nod6ed to have chi1dren and
ath1eus avoid vigorous outdoor esacise and persons with
respiratory problems are advised to sur indoors.
The Disaia's 1l~ division manages a permit
system to ensure that potentially poDuting operations and
indumia1 equipment meet me emission sundards set forth
14
D-57
in Disaict rules and regularions and sections of the Health
aod Safety Code. Pamits are required both prior to enn-
sauaion or ~11.nnn and again before any operation
begins for any operation or equipment that is capable of
emitting air comaminants.
Engineering also prql&reS sutionary sowce emissions
inventories, implements me Air T oxics "Hot Spots" lnvm-
tory and Assessment!u:t, dc.dops new and revised ru1es for
sutionary sources. and evalui.tes special projects such as new
or expanded landfiDs, uash recyding. and me use of high-
tanperanue plasma to destroy media1-
The Disaia's CompI....... division assists industry in
undemanding and cnmpIying with Disaict rules and sua:
law. Advisories are sent when new regulations are adopted to
explain the new requirements to all those ~
Compliance sWF investigates citizen enmplaints about
odors, smoke and other emission problems. If a valid
cnmplaint exists. a notice of violation may be issued.
These divisions within me Disaia work together to
improve air quality. For example, Monitoring sWF performs
laboratory and field testing for sutionary sowces of air
poUution and provides the resu1ts as needed to Engineering
and Compliance personnel. Also, Compliance field inspec-
tors visit loa1 businesses to make sure that permit ennditions
required by Disaia engineers are understood and applied
properly. Thus each division of me Distria is distinctive yet
dependent upon the otbers.
Other FuncV9ns
The Disaict aIIo dew:Iops long-cam regional plans to
tcduce unhealthful poDution 1eveIs including aansporration
cnnaolmeuwa to teduce the number of aips and travel.
These plans oudine speci6c sumgies and cnnaol measures
to 8Chievc dean air sundards set by me fedcral and sua:
~ts.
The Disaict cnnduas cnmmunity education programs
and works with the media to inform the public on tl.e causes
and sowces of air pollution, its advase hea1th elI'ects. and
ways me public can cnnaibute to improving air qualiry.
Otizens are cncowaged to report "smoking" ve1Udes on a
toll-IRe hodine and letters are sent to the ve1Ude's owners
asking them to repair the problem.
..
~
~
Oti7en Involvement
The Air Pollution Contro1 District enCowages citizens 10
get involved in District activities by mending District
workshops. hearinp. and Board mcetinp or by serving on a
ciOzen advisory committee.
amen Advisory CommitteeS
The District cumndy has twO ciOzen advisory commit-
_ that meet on a regular basis - the Air Quality Saaregy
Oevdopment Committee and the Air Pollution Control
District Advisory Committee.
The Air Quality Saaregy Development Committee
consisls of 33 members repraenting a broad specaum of
interalS and expertise. The committee advises the Distria
on matterS relating to air quality plans required by the state
and federa1 Clean Air Acts.
.
The Air Pollution Conaal Distria Adviacxy
Committee's nine members mab: 1eCO"'.......I"""ns on
maaas relating 10 the Oistria's annual budget. permit fees.
annuall""ll''''rqx>rlS, and rqpdamry dIanges.
The Hearing Boald
Established by swe law, the Hearing Board consisls of
1M citizens (an annmey, an engineer, a -mal expert. and
twO repraentatMs of the public). Although appointed by
the Air Pollution Control Board. the Hearing Board is an
independent quasi-judicial body.
Variances = granted only by the Hearing Board. It also
hears appeals of operating conditions set by the District.
appeals conceming permit cIeniaIs. and sWF reqllCSlS fOr
permit revocations and abatement mders.
10 Ways to Oear the Air
.
What can you do about air pollution? Here = some
simple guidelines:
1. Reduce your driving. Whenever pDGible, combine er-
rands. carpool. use public aansportation, ride a bicycle,
or walk. T elecommute (work
tiomhorne) orworldongerhows
fewer days a week.
1. Keep your car in good running
condition and the tires properly
inlIatcd.Also, use less polluting
reformulated gasoline or drive a
clean fud ~cle.
3. Don't top off your gas tank. Gasoline spillage evaporates
and c:onuibuD:s III smog. It also ....dllins lDIic poIIUIaDlS.
.. Support the smog c:hcck program. RancMng emission
control equipment does not improve enpe perfor-
mance.
s. Report "smoking" ~cles. CaIlI-800-28-SMOKE 10
report ~des with exassM tailpipe emissions.
D-5<6
6. Around the home, awid the
use of aerosol spray produas.
MllStaerosolpropellams con-.
uibute to smog.
7. Use _-hued paints and
solvents. Oil-based paints
contain three to 1M times
more toXic dvents than _-I: I · .= paints. Also,
I=p lids cL-i when not in use and paint with brushes
or rollers rather daan -t"'.,~"
DO
8. Whm you fire up the bubccue. use an dearie probe. a
chimney that uses newspapers or _lighter 8uid that
prodw:a less emissions than traditional c:barcmllighter.
9. Use eneIIY-dicient Ji&bting w'-- p--3.k Make
sure Ji&bts and applianas = rumed offwhen not in use.
In addition, raise the laIIperatUI'C Ievd on your air
conditioner a fi:w degrees in summer and turD down the
beat a fi:w cIegrees in winter.
10. lnstaI1so1arenergy. Water and space bcatinglIlXIOIIDtlOr
more than 50% ofhousehold eneIIY use.
15
CaIIomIa" AeaOUl_.1bId
1988 CaIifomia Clean AIr Ad.
.
EnvIronmenI8I ProIectIon AgIn:y
- ..
1990 Federal Clean AIr Ad.
CIlIzlIn
AdvIIoIy
Commlttm
San Diego County Air Pollution Control Board
IIIIfIng
Boerd
.
.. ..
I Air Pollution Control Officer
I
I
Engineering ComplIance
- Administrative ServIces
- AJr Resources
Air Monitoring
. SbMeJl Development
,
I I
... EngIneerIng ... Monitoring & CornpIIence
Technlcil ServIces ,.... - PublIc WormalIon
- Chemical I- Ambient Quality Nt AeIlMc8I &
Assurance l.- I-- DIIa M1111lJ1R*1l
Sballgy De1.llapmenl
- Mechanical - SlaIionarY Source ClerIcal
Testing i"'"" & PerIoI a III
f- Air Toxics ..... SlaIionarY Source Accounting
. Test WItneSSing - & FInMce
~ Vapor RecnYery - Meteorology
EmissiolIS Inven\OIy & Modeling ,. n' C'o ..- " .~ . ..
.. . -,'.-', .. ;
I- RUe DMIopmenl Instnrnel1l Support, San Diep Co_ty
L..- Ambient Operation Air PoUutioa Coauol DUtria
& MaiItenanC8 9150 O'-p"".... DrM
Sa Dier,o. CA 91123
I.- Special Pr:;ects
Permit &: GeoeaIIaiOmwion .......... (619) 694-3307
o I'01Nm> ON lECYCUD P....
Q '1:~~~~':,~\('..'...,l'oz;:'ft!"~.,..!fJ1~""....#~7N.;:':~ .,:. ~ .
D_5_,...........-:.~_..~~...M,fP'~i-<t:z';l:.~~~.1oi' .
Air Q!Wity F..cl CI" M-se ............. (619) 565-6626
ScnnIdng Vebide ReportiDa ........... 1-800-28-SMOKE
lI_l":"'" Comf"-lna ........................(619) 694-3340
Trip RecIucol- HodiDe .....................1-800-559.7799
SmaB Ao.__ J.";'-- .................... (619) 694-2288
eo--~.nlty R~Jfd.~hnn ....... (619) 694-3332
j
.
!
.
.
.
--c,.,-~-~-.,W"'~_
1993 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT
ON THE 1991 REGIONAL AIR QUALITY STRATEGY
FOR THE SAN DIEGO AIR BASIN
In conformance with the requirements of SectiOll 40924(a) of die California Clean Air Act, this
repon presents the stID.IS of San Diego Air Polludon Control Dislrict (DisIrict) effons to implement
me 1991 Revised Relional Air Quality Strltegy (RAQS).adopted pul'lUlDt to me California
Clean Air Act by me Air Pollution Control BoW on JUDe 30, 1992 and --cIecI March 2, 1993 to
reflect Air Resources Board (ARB) comments. As specified in ARB's "Gn;t1~ for Annual and
Triennial Progress Repons Under the California Clean Air Act' this fiJst lIDJ1ual progress report
addresses all District rulemaldng from 1987 through 1993. Propess in implementing the
nonregulatory tI'IIISp01'Wion control measures (TCM) contained m die 1991 RAQS is. also
discussed.
DISTRICT RIlLES ADOPTION STATUS
Since 1987, me District has adopted 24 new rules and amended 32 other rules. Ten of me new
Nles adopted since 1987 have alsO been amended. Most rule amendments WIl....tcd deficiencies in
Reasonably Available Control Technology identified by me federal EnvironlJ1el1tal Protection
Agency (EP A). The rest reflect revised control requirements. .
Table 1 presents 18 District rules scheduled in the 1991 RAQS to be adopted or amended between
1987 and 1993, listed according to the year me RAQS bad scheduled the rule to be adopted or
amended. The actual or revised scheduled adopt!on or amendment dates are presented in the two
right-hand columns for comparison to the RAQS schedule. Actual rule adoption or amendment
dates are presented in month/day/year format. Revised scheduled adoption or amendment dates are
in month/year format, except where me Board bearing date is known. Amendment dates are
preceded by "Amd." The original adoption date is listed for a rule only if me Nle was newly
adopted in 1987 or later. For rules mat have been atnended more man once since 1987, only the
most recent amendment date,is listed.
Table 2 presents SO rules adopted or amended since 1987 d1at had not been scheduled in the
RAQS. That large volwne of Nlemaking not ....hNlnlM in d1e RAQS was due to correcting RACT
deficiencies, and adopting federal New Source Performance Standards, National Emission
Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants, and controls required by state law for Toxic Air
Contaminants.'
Of me eighteen rules scheduled in d1e RAQS to be adopted or """'I"'ed by 1993, six were adopted
by 1991. Twelve rules scheduled for adoption in 1992 and 1993 were delayed to allow for
development of socioeconomic impact -....ents required by state law prior to adoption of any
rules that would significantly affect emlssiOllS. Ten of thole rules are now 9clledu1ed for adoption
in 1994, as specified in Table 1. District staff bas prepared draft socioeconomic impact
assessments for six of me rules to date.
Development of two rules, Adhesives and d1e Student Trip ReductiOll Ptoa.am. awaits ARB
guidance. A statewide Best Available Retro& Control TecImology cIelerminadOn for Adhesives is
currently under development, but d1e completiOll dare is unknown. ARB has lIDJ10unced d1at it is
preparing to develot' guidance on student trip reduction pro~ but me. Dislrict is not aware ,?f a
scheduled complenon date. ARB has also prepared draft revised IUidance OIl transpOnatlon
control measures performance standards pursuant to me 1992 California Clean Air Act
D-iPl
1993 Progress Report on San Diego Regional Air Quality Strategy
Page 2
.........
amendments. Development of a student lrip reduction program will be revisited after both ARB
guidance documems are final.
Rule 1301, the Trip Reduction Program for Employers with 100 or More Employees, focuses on
> federal Clean Air Act requirements for Severe ozone nonAttslinrnent areas. If the federal EP A
reclassifies San Diego from Severe to Serious, as requested by the District and ARB. then an
employer lrip reduction program would no longer be tIIlIDdaled by federal law and Rule 1301
would automatically become inoperative. After ARB issues its final revised auidanc:e on
transportation control measures performance standards. the District would amend the rule to
... conform to state requirements. mcluding provisions for alternative motor vehicle emission
~ reduction stnUegies.
-...
""'"
D- (oz,
.
.
.
1993 Progress Repon 011 San Dieao Reaiona1 Air Quality SttlIlIegy
Page 3
TABLE 1
District Rules ia 1991 RAQS Adopted or Ameaded Siace 1987
Listed br RAQS Scheduled Adoptioa Date
RAQS Revised
Rule Scheduled Aaua1 Scheduled
Number ConlrOl Measure Title Pollntrt Adopti.m/ Adoption! Adoption!
~ AmeDdmem AmeDdmem
YeIIr DID DID
67.3 Coating of Metal Parts and ROO Pm-RAQS Amd. 10116190 AmcI. 10194
ProdUClS
67.10 Kelp ~1.lUId Bio- ROO Pm-RAQS Amd.5/21/91 Amd.5/94
Polymer lICtUring
()perBti0llS
67.11 Wood Product Coating ROO Pm-RAQS 3Il4t19
()perBti0llS Amd. 12118190
67.12 Polyester Resin Operations ROO Pm-RAQS 3Il4t19
Amd. 416193
67.18 Marine Coating ()perBti0llS ROO Pm-RAQS Amd. 713190 Amd. 6194
1203 Ethylene Oxide Slerili2m ROO Pm-RAQS 7/23191
20.1- New Source Review AD 1992 Amd.3/94
20.4
67.19 Coatings.and Printing Inks ROO 1992 3/29/94
Manufacturing Openiions
69 Elecaical Generating Steam NOx 1992 1118194
Boilers
1301 Trip Reduction ~ for AD 1992 1118194
Employers wirh 1 or More
EmPloyees
Student Trip Reduction AD 1993 After ARB
Program Guidance
67.13 Underground Gas Tank ROO 1993 12194
DecommissioninglUld Soil
Decontamination
67.20 Automotive RefInisbing ROO 1993 8194
67.21 Adbesi.ves ROO 1993 After
BARCT
D~u.ih.ed
67.22 Foam Blowing lUId Plastics ROO 1993 5194
Expanding OpenmoIlS
67.23 Plastic. Rubber. Composite. ROO 1993 12194
and Glass Coadnp
67.24 Bakery Ovens ROO 1993 4/94
69.2 I ~ lIIId Comme.~ NOx 1993 7194
BoiIm
.
ROO. Racdve 0rpIIic 0UeI, NOx. 0xIdII ofNiaopa. Amd.. A__'
Pre-RAQS . Adopled <<-".., priar ID 1991 RAQS ~
D-~3
1993 Progress Report on San Diego Regional Air Quality SlIlIIegy
Page 4
TABLE 2
District Rules Not In RAQS Adopted or Amended Since 1987
Listed by Rule Number .
Aaual
Rule Adoption!
Number Control Measure Title Pollurant Amendment
DIre
11 Exemption from Permit Requireme.us AD Amd. 212/92
19 Provision of Sampling and Testing Facilities AD Amd. 4/6193
19.3 Emission Jnformation AD 4/6193
59 Waste Disposal Siles ROO 1113187
61.0 Definitions Pertaining to the Storage of Otpnic ROO Amd. 10/16190
Compounds
61.1 Receiving and Storing Volati1e Otpnic Compounds at ROO Amd. 10116190
Bulk Plants and Bulk Terminals
61.2 Transfer of Volatile Organic Compounds into Mobile ROO Amd.l0/1619O
Transpon Tanks
61.3 Transfer of Volati1e Organic Compouads iato Stationary ROO Amd.l0/1619O
Storage Tanks
61.4 Transfer of Volatile Organic CompoWlds into Vehicle Fuel ROO Amd. 10/16190
Tanks
61.6 NSPS Requirements for Storage of Volatile Organic ROO Amd. 1/13187
Compounds
61.7 Spillage and Le~"'~F of Volatile Organic Compounds ROO Amd. 1/13187
61.8 Certification Requirements for Vapor Control Equipment ROO Amd. 1/13187
61.9 Separation of Organic Compounds from Water ROO Amd. 3/14189
66 Organic Solvents ROO Amd.719191
67.0 Architectural Coatings ROO Amd. 1214190
67.1 Alternative Emission Control Plans ROO 5121191
67.2 Dry C1eaniag Equipment Using Petroleum-Based Solvent ROO Amd. 5/21191
67.4 Metal Container Oosure and Coil Coating Operations ROO Amd.71319O
67.5 Paper, Film, and Fabric Coaling Operations ROO Amd.1011619O
67.6 Solvent Oeaniag Operations ROO Amd.l0/1619O
67.7 Cutbeck and EIJ,"1~tied Asphalts ROO Amd. 5/21191
67.8 Dry Cleaniag Equipment Using Halogenated Otpnic ROO Amd. 12118190
Solvents
67.9 Aerospace Coatiag Operations ROO Amd. 1112193
67.15 Phannaceutical and C......W'ic Mann""""lrina Operations ROO 10118188
Amd. 12118190
67.16 Graphic Arts Operations ROO 10/18188
Amd. 5/21191
.
ROO . Real:tive Organic Oases, AmI!.. ...-__,
n-to~
--..
'""'"
""'"
.
.
..
1993 Progress Report on San Diego Relional Air Quality SlraIeaY
TABLE 2 (CODtlnUed)
District Rules Not ID RAQS Adopted or Aaeacled Since 1987
Listed by Rule Number .
Page 5
Aaual
Rule Adopdon/
NlID\ber Conlrol Measum Tille Pnll......t Ammdment
D8le
67.17 Storage of Materials Containina Vo1adIe Orpnic ROO 316190
Compounds . Amd. 9121193
68 Pue1 Sumin. Equipment NOx Amd. 5/1190
1201 Cuome PIatina and CbronUc Add AIIntfi.,;", Pt J.1IIm 316190
0InlmIum Amd. 5128191
1202 Cooq Towers PtIa.1IIm 5/28/91
CbnlmiwD
1204 Surface Applications far ~,'i._ Materials Cootainina Asbestos 11/17192
Asbestos
1205 Medical W.. Inc:lnerators Dioxins 7120193
New Source Perform.Dce StaDdarcls
Subpart Oeneral Provisions Amd. 1113192
A.
Subpart StaIIdards of Perfonnance for Commercial.l1ut..-w NOx. 12115187
Db. Steam Generating Units SOX. PM Amd. 9121193
Subpart Standards of Performance for Small Xrvt..9ftia1. NOx. 7/14192
Dc. Commercial. Institutional Steam Generating Units SOX. PM
Subpart Standards of Perfonnance for Municipal Waste NOx. 7114192
Ea- Combustors SOX. PM
Subpart Standards of Performance for SlClI'Ip Vessels for ROO Amd.3/14189
K. Petroleum Liquids
Subpart Standards of Performance for SlClI'Ip Vessels for ROO Amd. 3114189
Ka. Petroleum Liquids
Subpart StaIIdards of Perf01'llllDCe for Volatile Orpnk Liquid ROO 3/14189
Kb- Storage Vessels Amd. 10116190
Subpart Standards of Perfonnance for Sew. Tft.."'dlt Plants ROO 9/17187
0-
Subpart StaIIdards of Perfonnance for Surface COItin. of Metal ROO 3/19187
EE- Fumiture Amd. 1113192
Subpart StaIIdards of Performance for Pressum Sendrive Tape IDd ROO 3119187
RR- Label Surface Coatin. Opentioos Amd. 1113192
Subpart Standards of PerformIIIce for Industrial Surface COItin.: ROO Amd.1113192
SS. Larp App1iances
Subpart Standards of Performance for MeIal Coil Surface CoItln. ROO Amd. 1113192
TT-
ROO ~ Reclive 0rpIIic: 0-. NOx. Oxidea 01 Niaapa, !OK. Oxidea at Sulfur. PM. PIniI:uIIle MIaer.
Amd.....~t
D-1.o5
1993 Progress Repon on San Diego Regional Air Quality Strategy
Page 6
TABLE 2 (coDtiDaed)
District Rules Not ID RAQS Adopted or Amended SiDce 1987
Listed by Rule Number
-..
AauaI
Rule Adoption/
Number Control Measure Title Pollutant Amendment
DIre
sultan Standards of Performance for the Rubber Tile ROO 3M189
BB - Manufacturing IndIlStl'y
~~ Standards of~Cullllance for Flexible Vinyl and Urethane ROO 3119187
Coating and Printing
Subpan Standards bf Performance for Petroleum Dty CIeaneni ROO 1211.5187
J]] -
~~ Standards of Performance for Nonmetallic Mineral PM 3/19187
Processing Plants
National Emission StaDdards for Hazardous Air
Pollutants
Subpan General Provisions Amd. 1/13187
A-
Subpan National Emission Standard for Mercury Mercury Amd. 3/27190
E-
Subpan National Emission Standard for Asbestos Asbestos Amd. 7131190
M-
-..
Table 3 presents the IUle development schedule for roles now scheduled to be adopted or amended
in 1994. The rule development schedule includes workshop dates and socioeconomic impact
assessment completion dates. Table 4 lists other IUles scbeduIed to be adopted in 1994, for which
the District has not yet scheduled workshops and socioeconomic impact assessment completion
dates. Tables 3 and 4 constitute the 1994 Annual Regulatory Schedule mandated by Section
40923(a) of the California Clean Air Act.
-..
ROO . Ractive Oralllic Clues, NOll. 0ltideI of NiIroseD, SOx. 0ltideI of Sulfur. PM. PIrticu1ate Mauer.
Amd.....~l
10- Co~
.
.
.
1993 Progress Report on San Die&O ReJional Air Quality su.gy
Page 7
TABLE 3
1994 RULE DEVELOPMENT SCHEDULE
Socioeconomk: Revised
RuJe Workshop Ib~ Sc:hedu1ed
Number Control Measure Tide Dare(s) ",flUS'.~t AdoptionI
Fln-H7Arion Amendment
DlIe DlIe
20.1- New Source Review 11/10192 1J94 Amd. 3194
20.4 9/1~3
Reg. 14 Federal Operatina Permits 10117J)3 Not Required 1/18194
67.3 Coadng of Metal Pans IIId Producls 5194 7194 Amd. 10/94
67.4 Metal Container. Closure IIId eon 6194 8/94 Amd. 17J)4
Coadng Operations
67.6 Solvent CJtIU'li11g 0peraIi0ns 7194 9194 Amd. 12194
67.8 Dry C1t....m,g Equipment Using 7194 9194 Amd. 1~4
Halopnared Orpriic SolvSltS
67.10 Kelp PJOcessln~':io-Polymer 11124/92 3194 Amd.5~4
Manufacturing . ons 8IWJ3
67.13 UndeIJfOW1d Gas Tink 7194 9~4 17J)4
Deconunissioning and Soil
Decontamination
67.18 Marine Coating Operations 6122193 3194 Amd. 6194
67.19 Coatings and Printing Inks 7~~1 11/4193 3129194
Manufacturing Operations 11/4193
67.20 Automotive Refinishing &'17J)2 5194 8194
67.22 Foam Blowing and Plastics Expanding 10129m 7J)4 5~4
Operations
67.23 Plastic. Rubber. Composite. IIId Glass 5194 7194 17J)4
Coatings
67.24 Bakery Ovens 11/5m 1J94 4194
1/18/94
68 Fuel Burning Equipment 17J)~3 2194 Amd. 7194
69 Electrical Generating Sleam Boilers 11128190 912VJ3 1/18194
7/19~1
613~3
69.2 Indusaial and Commercial Boilers 11l19m 4194 7194
69.3 Stationary Combustion TlaMu... 6194 8/94 10/94
1301 :t Reduttion Program for BmpIoyem 12/16192 10114193 1/18/94
100 or More EIDplo)'eeI 9/15-16t93
Amd. .J.~t
D-~7
1993 Progress Repon on San Diego Regional Air Quality Strategy
Page 8
-.
TABLE 4
OTHER RULES SCHEDULED TO BE DEVELOPED IN 1994
Conl1'Ol Measure Tide Pollutant
Residential Low-NOx Water Hearers NOx
Residential Low-NOx Furnaces NOx
Indirect Somce Review An
Mobile Somce Rmk<riQII Reduction CIedks An
The RAQS had also scheduled two other rules for amendments in 1994. Amendments to Rule
67.11 - Wood Products Coatings are being delayed beyond 1994 pending the development of a
Conl1'Ol Technique Guideline document by EPA. Amendments to Rule 67.12 - Polyester Resin
Operations were adopted on 4/6193, ahead of the scheduled 1994 adoption date.
NONREGULATORYTRANSPORTATION CONTROl. MEASURES STATUS
The 1991 RAQS included six nonregulalory tranSportation control measures (TCMs): Transit
Improvements, Vanpools, High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) Lanes, Park and Ride Facilities.
Bicycle Facilities, and Traffic Signal Improvements. For each TCM, the RAQS committed to
continuing existing implementation efforts as specified in the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP).
According to the Draft 1993 RTP, the following improvements are programmed for completion by _.
1999 with identified funding sOUJCeS. ,
Transit Imnrovements: Trolley extensions to Santee, Mission Valley and University City;
commuter rail service from Oceanside to downtown San Diego, new express bus service from
Escondido to Keamy Mesa, and ten new transit centers are programmed. Additionally, the
Mel1'Opolitan Transit Development Board has been allocated funding from vehicle registration fees
authorized by AB2766 to purchase 6S new low-emission buses to replace high etnitting older
diesel buses.
Vanpools: Implementation of the RAQS measure for a vanpool development program was
contingent upon additional funding. No such funding has yet been identified.
HOV Lanes: HOV Lanes are programmed for construction along I-S from I-80S to Manchester
Avenue.
Park and Ride Facilities: Other than the ten new transit centers mentioned under transit
improvements (may not all include park and ride facilities), the draft 1993 RTP does not discuss
development of additional park and ride facilities. .
Bicvc:le Facilities: 402 toiles of additional bikeways are programmed, averaging over SO tniles of
additional bikeways per year.
Traffic Sisnal Imprt?vements: About 1,250 siInalized intersections will be interconnected and
oprimi7"" with elUSting funding sources. Addiiional fundil1g has not yet been identified to allow
all 2,500 signalized intersections to be computer optimized.
-.
D-lO'l>
. .
.
-_.--- "'"
.
Air PoUution Control Board
Brian P. Bilbray Disrrict 1
Dianne Jacob Disrricl 2
Pamela Slater Disrricl 3
Leon L. Williams Disrricl 4
John MacDonald Disrricl 5
" .
\ j Ii'
\, i / / / _
j' .
,., ';';:;;,T \;~'~', .,"1-'"
~~
...............
c..ln If UI 11111
Air PoUution Control Officer
R. J. Sommerville
.
.
REGION'S SMOG DESIGNA nON DROPS TO
SERIOUS, REGULA nONS TO BE EASED
(Embargoed for release at U:30 p.m. PDT, 7122193)
Contact: Bob Goggin
694-3332
The state Air Resources Board (ARB) has lowered the San Diego air basin's non-
attainment area classification for ozone (photochemical smog) from severe to serious.
The announcement was made at a news conference held July 22 by Air Pollution Control
Board Chairman Brian BUbray and Vice-Chair Pam Slater.
"San Diego is only the second and the largest air basin to be reclassified in ARB
history," said BUbray. "This change will have a significant regulatory and economic
impact on San Diego businesses."
The change came after studies by the ARB and San Diego Air Pollution Control
District. District staff analyzed all days between 1989 and 1992 in which smog levels
exceeded .15 parts per million (ppm) at the region's nine monitoring stations - a total
of 35 days.
Analysis by the District determined that days over .15 ppm were due to
"transport" - pollution blown southward from the Los Angeles air basin.
Under the California Oean Air Act, San Diego is not required to control local
emission sources to compensate for transport pollution from Los Angeles. After
eliminating the impact of transport upon San Diego's smog levels, the ARB concluded
that the region's smog classification should be changed to serious.
The new state classification will have the following benefits:
. Reduce the performance requirement for the employer trip reduction
program from an average vehicle occupancy of 1.5 to 1.4 by 1999;
-more-
"I)-70
9150 Chesapeake Drive' San Diego · California 92123-1096' (619) 694-3307
FAX (619) 694-2730 . Smoking Vehicle Hodine 1-800-28-SMOKE
.
.
.
APeD SMOG DESIGNATION DROPS
2-2-2
· Avoid the Clean Air Act requirement to reduce the overall population
exposure to ambient pollutant levels in excess of specified levels in certain
years;
· Increase the emission threshold for no net increase in non-attainment
pollutants (hydrocarbons and oxides of nitrogen) for new or modified
sources from 10 to lS tons per year. As a result, approximately 100 permit
applications per year will no longer be subject to this provision.
The ARB has also written a letter to the Environmental Protection Agency (EP A)
asking them to correct a reporting error and reduce San Diego's federal smog
classification from severe to serious based on the "S percent option."
"If the federal classification is revised, more-restrictive federal requirements
affecting business - including employer trip reduction - could be relaxed or
eliminated," said Vice-Chair Slater.
The federal classification of .19 ppm is based on the fourth highest smog level
recorded between 1987 and 1989 at the Del Mat monitoring station. The actual
measurement was .185 ppm , but computer software automatically rounds up the data
to two-digit figures.
The cut point between serious and severe is .18 ppm. If three-digits figures are
considered, San Diego would be within the S percent option and cou1dqualify for the
serious designation.
Although the federal government does not recognize the influence of transported
pollution, the District believes a serious classification is appropriate, because transport
has a major influence at the two monitoring sites with the highest recorded smog levels
(Del Mar and Oceanside).
-more-
u-7/
e.
APCD SMOG DESIGNATION DROPS
3-3-3
"
!
U the EP A accepts the serious designation, business would be relieved of several
significant federal requirements:
. The region's businesses with 100 or more employees will no longer be
required to meet federal requirements for reducing the number of vehicles
arriving at the worksite. However, they would still be subject to state
requirements.
. The threshold for requiring federal operating permits and for new and
modified stationary sources would be 50 tons per year instead of 25 tons.
About 25 businesses would no longer come under the rule.
. The threshold for required industry to apply reasonably available
e pollution control technology would also be 50 tons per year instead of 25.
. The offset requirement for new and modified sources of emissions would
be reduced from 1.3 to 1 to 1.2 to 1.
'"
93-8 (7/22/93)
e
u- 7Z,
~
~
.~:'-,
.......1IIIa
CUI" IF "I 11111
'.i;
Air PoUUbon Control Board
Brian P. Bilbray Dim;" 1
Dianne Jacob Dimi" 2
Pamela Slater DistriCt 3
Leon L Williams District 4
John Macl>onald DistriCt 5
, ''',',
Air POUUriOD Control Officer
R. J. SommerviUe
.
.
ADVISORY
EMPLOYER TRIP REDUCTION REGULATION ADOPTED;
OZONE RECLASSIFICATION WOULD REPEAL RULE
On January 18, 1994. the San Diego County Air Pollution Control Board adopted Regulation
xm. the employer trip reduction program for worksites with 100 or more employees. and
related amendments to Rule 2S and Rule 132.
Regulation xm is required by the federal Clean Air Act for areas such as San Diego that are
classified as Severe ozone nonll1lainment areas. The San Diego County Air Pollution Control
Board has petitioned the federal Environmental Protection Agenc:, (EPA) to revise San
Diego's Severe ozone classification to Serious. If EPA approves this request, the reclassifi-
cation would remove the federal requirement for a trip reduction program in San Diego,
leaving only a more flexible state Clean Air Act requirement. Since Regulation xm was de-
signed to meet federal requirements. it could then be replaced by a more flexible program to
meet the state requirement
Alternatively, if San Diego is not reclassified, adopted Regulation xm will be implemented
effective July I, 1995. unless disapproved by EPA. If the rule is disapproved by EPA, a
new version would have to be adopted.
If Regulation xm is ultimately implemented, it would apply to worksites with 100 or more
employees. However, employers with fewer than 33 employees reporting to the worksite
between 6 a.m. and 10 a.m. are exempt.
Beginning Julv 1. 1995. the regulation would require affected worksites to annually survey
employees to determine their morning commute travel modes. Worksites not achieving
specified Average Vehicle Ridership (A VR) targets would be required to submit a trip reduc-
tion plan for review and approval by July 1. 1996. which demoristrates trip reduction strate-
gies at the worksite to achieve the A VR target by Julv 1. 1998. The Air Pollution Control
District will develop guidance to assist employers in deve1opin. their trip reduction plans.
. Following EPA's final action on the reclassification request IIld approval of Regulation xm,
the Air Pollution Control District will notify aft'ected employers of their trip reduction require-
ments. If you have any questions regarding Regulation Xm or this advisory, please call
Morris Dye at (619) 694-2452. If you would like a copy of the adopted regulanon. please
call Juanita Ogata at (619) 694-8851.
HPS:RR:jo
1/26194
D-7Lf"
9150 Chesapeake Drive · San Diego · California 92123-1096. (619) 694-3307
FAX (619) 694-2730 . Smoking Vehicle Hodine 1-800-28-SMOKE .
All. ......_--' _ D_l-I "*--
. REGULATIO~ xm. TRIP REDUCTION (Adopled 1/18194; Effective 7/1/(5)
.
,
,
RULE 1301. TRIP-REDUCTION PROGRAM FOR EMPLOYERS WITH
100 OR MORE EMPLOYEES
(a) APPLICABILITY
(1) This rule lIpplies to all employers with 100 or men employees at a worksite
within San Diego County.
(2) The lIpplicable empl~J= includes all employees IepOrting to the
worksite, all employees fepo.Ung' y from home to a locat1Cl11 other than the worksite.
all employees who ~ telec:oUluluting. and all employees 1'e}lOl ting to a satellite wprlcsite.
(3) The employer-size dele. ..,;n.rioo CClIISiders the average number of employees
based on the employer's payroll periods during the year prior to notification that an A VR
Report is due.
(b) EXEMPTIONS
f
.
"
(1) Consauction job sites with a CODStniCtiClll schedule of less than ClIIe-year shall
be exempt from the ~nts of this Rule. .
(2) The follOWlDg classes of individuals shall not be included in the employer size
determin~ClII or employer Average Vehicle Ridership (A VR) calculatiClll.
(i) Volunteers.
(ii) Disabled persons who must driw a specially equipped vehicle
designed to accommodate their disability.
(ill) Real estate agents.
(iv) Taxi driwrs who lease their vehicles.
(v) TewpOalll" employees substituting for absentee permanent employees. and
(vi) Persons not on the employer's payroll.
(3) Employers with fewer than 33 employees tepo.ti4glD the worksite during the
Principal Travel Period shall be exempt from the requirements of this Rule.
(c) DEFINITIONS
.
.
(1) "Alternative Commute Modes" MeAn, bicyclin.. buspool. carpool,
compressed work schecllJle. teIecormmltin.. cransit, vanpool, and walking, but excludes
driving alone.
(2) " Alternative Work Hour Proarams" MeAn. any method for adjusting the
starting and encIin. times of an employee's wadt day ID facilitAte the use of alternative
commute modes or otherwise reduce motor vehicle trips cm:t the Principal Travel Period.
Such programs may include. but ~ not limited ID 'otnples work schedules and flextime.
Regulation x:m
1/26194
U"15
-1-
Rule 1301
(3) "Averale Vebide Rldenblp" or "A VR" means the number of employees .......
Roi"ADnI to;a worksite during the Principal Travel Period (between 6 Lm. and 10 Lm. ,
Monday tbiough Friday) in the SlineY Week divided by the number of vehicles used by
those employees to commute to the wcxksite, as calculated in Subsection (d)(l)(i).
(4) "Averale A VR" for a Collec:tive A VR Report or a ComnUiI-ted A VR Report
means the average of !be A VRs far multiple worbites weighted by !be number of employ-
ees at each worksite mivinl during the Principal Travel Period.
(S) " A VR Report" means an annual report filed by an employer which shows the
number of employees reponing to !be worksite, !be number of completed employee
surveys, employee mival times and modes used in commutinlto the worksite and the
employer's calculation of its annual A VR.
(6) "A VR Target" means the AveraJe Vehicle Ridership performance standards
establisbedin Subsection (d)(I).
(7) "Bicydinl" means commuting by bicycle.
(8) "Buspool" means a bus service with limited pickups and destination stops.
guaranteed seats and advance ticket pID'Chase. Buspools are sometimes administered by the
employer or the riders themselves.
(9) "Carpool" means a motor vehicle occupied by an employee and at least one
other person of driving age and/or one or mc:n chilchn being dropped off at a child care
facility at or within one-half mile of the worbite, commutinltogether on a regular basis (at
least weekly). """"\
(10) "Centre City Planning Area" or "CCPA" means the downtown San Diego
area bordered on the north and east by Interstate Route S, on !be north by Laurel Street, on
the west and south by San Diego Bay, and on !be southeast by Commercial Street from
Interstate Route S west to Sixteenth Street, then southwest along Sixteenth Street to Newton,
then southeast along NeWton Avenue to Bilsby Street, then southwest along Bigsby Street to
Harbor Drive, then southeast along Harbor Drive to Beardsley Street, and southwest in line
with Beardsley Street to San Diego Bay.
(11) "Clean Alternative Fuel" means elecnicity, compressed natural gas (eNOl,
propane, methanol, or ethanol
(12) "Collective A VR Report" means an A VR Report filed by a Transportation
Management Association (TMA) representing multiple employers and worksites.
(13) "Commute Trip" means a home-lD-work nip with either the ori~ or desti.
nation within 1he boundaries of San Diego County, made regularly in connectlOn with
employment. Commute ttips sbal1 include home-lD-Other-lD-wark trip combinations, where
"other" refers to such inte.Ollodiate destinations as day care, bank, gas station, or SlOre.
(14) "Commute Mode" means !be travel mode which tile employee uses for the
longest distance portion of a .......mtlte nip.
(IS) "Commuter Computer" is San Diego's regional ridesharin, agency operated
by CALTRANS and SANDAG. -."
Regulation xm
D-7(P
-2-
Rule 1301
.
.
.
".0""
(16) "Compressed Work Week Sclledules" means work schedules that
.......1'".." the traditional 5-day/40-bour weeldy work period into fewer than five days by
adopting a longer work day such u three 12-hour work days and two weekdays off per
week (3136). four lo-hour work days and ODe weekday off per week (4140). and eight
9-hour work days. one 8-hour wotk day and one weekday off every two weeks (9180).
(17) "COIUIOIiclated A VR Report" me.". an A VR Repon filed by an employer
for more than one worksite.
(18) "Employee" means any person on an empl~s payroll, including full-time
and part-time employees,lempOrlIIy employees DOt substituting far absentee permanent
employees, the 0WIlCI' of a business. and su1dentl employed by an edU(".~onal institution,
who eIther leports or is primarily usigncd to a worksite 80 or more hours per 28-day
period, and works at leut 30 days in a year, excJndi"Ae~teers. Subcontractors meeting
these thresholds 8Ie c:onsidemi the employees of the Contractor for the purposes
of this Rule.
(19) "Employee-Days (ED)" means the sum for all employees of the number of
days per week each employee is sc1>MnlM to report to the worksite during the Principal
Travel Period.
(20) "Employee Transportation Coordinator" or "ETC" means a person
designated by an employer to act u a worksite li.icnn between the implementing agencies
and the employer, and between the employer and its employees.
(21) "Employer" means a sole proprietor, partnership, corporation, unin-
corporated usociation, joint venture, gover:nment agency, or other business entity that
employs 100 or more employees at a worksite, of which at leut 33 employees report to
the worksite during the Principal Travel Period. Where a construction site is at an existing
worksite, the general contractor for the construction sille shall be c:cnsidered the employer
of the cons1rUCtion employees. including employees of any subcontractors.
(22) "Fiscal Year" or "FY" means the annual period beginning July 1 and
ending June 30. As an example, FY-95 me.". July I, 1994 through June 30. 1995.
,
(23) "Flextime" means employees &Ie given the freedom to choose their starting and
leaving times, u long u they work the requiled hours and ~rlA... their responsibilities.
(24) "Good Cause" means the inability to comply with filina or im,Plementation
due dates u a mult of circumstaDCeS beyond the employer's control, in splte of IeUOnable
efforts to comply.
(25) "Guaranteed Ride Home Proaram" means ~,.: paranteed ride
home to employees who rideshale, when they can not use their Ie sbBIed ride home
because they either need to CO home early due to an emcqency or they need to work late.
G\W'A.-M ride home p.ogiIJDS may involve such me.... to CO home u using an employer
fleet vehicle, or subsid.""" vehicle rental or taxi service.
(26) "Joint Powen Ap-eement" or "JP A" ...". III agreement among a group
of delegated subregional entities (citiel/county) enabling thIt JI'OUP to coIJectively imple-
ment and enfon:e trip reduction ordi..."Ce'"
(27) "Onsite AmenIties" -.". facilities at the worksille thIt reduce an em-
ployee's need for a personal motor vehicle to make mid-day trips for personal business.
Regulation xm
D- 77
-3-
Rule 1301
Onsite automatic teller machines, bilce racksIlockers, shower and locker facilities, child care ~
facilities, athletic facilities, post offices and restaurants are examples of onsite amenities.
(28) "Principal Travel Period" or "PTP" means from 6:00 a.m. to 10:00 a.m.,
Monday through Friday.
(29) "Ridesharing" means the use of any Alternative Coumute Mode for
commuting.
(30) "SateUite Worksite" means a secondary work location close to employees'
homes, established or contracted by an employer or poop of employers for employees
who live far from the primary worksite(s) in order to reduce their vehicle miles traveled. A
satellite worksite shall not be considered a separate worksite, but instead, the employees at
the satellite worksite shall be included in the ~Ioyer size determination and employer
A VR calculation of the wOlXsite(s) for which it IS a satellite.
(31) "Survey Week" means a typical five-consecutive-weelcday period, that does
not include a holiday or border a holiday weekend The sID'Vey week shall be representa-
tive of typical worksite employee activities.
(32) "Target-Area" means (A) the San Diego Centre City Planning Area. (B) the
incorporated cities excluding San Diego Centre City Planning Area. or (C) the unincorpo-
rated area of San Diego County, u designated in Subsection (d)(l) of this Rule.
(33) "Telecommute" or "Telecommuting" means working at home for the
entire wOIk day. Employees who telecommute are included in the wOIksite employee""",
population for that day. Employees working at a satellite worksite are not counted as .
telecommuters but, rather, receive Vehicle Equivalent reduction credits u allowed under
Subsection (d)(l)(i)(E) of this Rule.
(34) "Transit" means a vehicle operated on a for-hire, multiple-occupant, shared-
ride basis, including trolley, commuter train, bus, shared-ride taxi, and shuttle van.
(35) "TransllOrtation Demand Management" or "TOM" means a com-
prehensive set of strategies designed to influence travel behavior with respect to mode,
time, frequency, route, or distance to reduce vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled
(36) "Transportation Demand Management Actions" means actions such as,
but not limited to, those in Subsections (d)(4Xviii) of this Rule.
(37) "Transportation Demand Manacement Proaram Administrator"
means an official appointed by the City, County or subregional entity to implement a
delegated local Trip Reduction Ordinance adopted pursuant to Section (t) of this Rule.
(38) "T.......portatlon Demand Management Plan" or "TOM Plan" means a
written plan outlining schedules, steps, plUj;lAmS, worksite incentives, amenities, monitor-
ing, evalualion, and corrective actions dw the employer shall implement to achieve its A VR
Target.
(39) "Transportation Management Association/Organization" or
"TMAlTMO" means a private and/or public service organization with a strategic plan
addressing institutional strUctures, "lUj;lAmS, services and funding for the purpose of""",
usisting businesses with implementing Transportation Control Measures (TCMs). Such
usociations may operate Employee Transportation Coordinator (ETC) NetwOIks, provide
Regulation xm
n-7'-6
-4-
Rule 1301
.
.
.
",
commuter services, guaranteed/emergency ride home programs, vanpools, and other
related programs.
(40) "V.pooI" means a van used routinely by 1evera1 (typically six or more)
employees to commute toaed1er.
(41) "Vehide Equivalent" me.". the panial or whole vehicle value between zero
and one wiped to each commute travel mode in Subsection (d)(I)(i)(C) of this Rule.
(42) "Vebide-Equivalent Days (VED)" IDrn. the sum, over the five week-
days, of the Vehicle Equivalent wipled to the commute mode used by each employee each
day of a Survey Week. "
(43) "Vehicle-Equivalent Reduction (VER)" means the reduction in vehicle
equivalent days credited to an employa-'s primary wcrksire for the reduction in vehicle miles
traveled achieved by employees c:om.:nuting to a satellite worksite near their homes instead
of commuting fanher to the primary worksite. "
(44) "Weipted Ave....e A VR Tarpt" means the avenge of the A VR Targets
fa' the different target areas in which employers filing Coosolidated or Col1ec:tive A VR
Repc.rts are located. weighted by the number of employees reponing to each worltsite
during the PTP. .
(45) "Worksite" means a land area, building, or group of buildings or portions
thereof which are in actua1 physical contact or separated solely by a single public or private
roadwaya' other public or pnVale right-of-way, or a ship in port for at least 30 consecutive
days, or other structure, where emp~ wcxk, under the ownership or control of a single
employer or employers under common control. Worltsite shall include construction sites
with a construcbOn schedule of at least me year.v
(d) STANDARDS AND REQUIREMENTS
(1) PERFORMANCE STANDARDS
" Each employer shall achieve durinJ:e 6:00 Lm. to 10:00 Lm. Principal Travel
Period (PI'P) the applicable Average V . Ie Ridership (A VR) Target listed below.
Minimum Averace Vebide Ridersbip (A VR) Tarcets
Tarcet.Area
Tar et
Tar t.Area A
1.50
.
Target-Area A..
Target-Area B-
Target-Area C-
Tar et.Area B 1.41
Ta .Area C 1.30
Employers within the San Diego Centre City Planning Area
Employers within an incorporated city in the County, but outside
Taapt-Area A
Employers within the IIIIincorporate area of the County
Regulation xm
D~79
-5-
Rule 1301
Regulation xm
(i) A VR Calculation
(A) AveraJe Vehicle R;tP.fth\p (A VR) is the ratio of the number of
employees totaled over a typical five-day (Monday through Friday) period that
report to the worksite between 6 LID. and 10 LID. to-tbe number of vehicles
used by those employees to arrive at the worksite during the PTP for that same
five-day period. To account for al1mlltive wcxk schedules (tc>........."m.Jling.
compressed work week, ere.) and various travel modes, the calculation of A VR
nriH7es Employee-Days and Vehicle-Equivalent Days. Therefore. A VR is
calculated by dividing Employee-Days by Vehicle-Equivalent Days. Employee-
days and Vehicle-Equivalent Days are derived below.
(B) qlovee-DaYs: Each weekday of a typical one-week period that an
employee is sch....lI).... to report to the worksite or associated satellite worksite
during the PTP counts as one Employee-Day, including each weekday.that an
employee te1ecommutes or has a scheduled weekday off as part of a coinpressed
work schedule. For example, a full-time employee woo typically reports to the
worksite on weekdays during the PTP counts as five Employee-Days, even if that
employee te1ecommutes or has a scheduled weekday off as part of a compressed
work week or reports to a satellite worksite. For part-time employees, one
Employee-Day is counted for each weekday of the one-week period that a part-
time employee is scheduled to report to the worksite during the PTP. The
following procedures are used to total Employee-Days.
(1) Employees telecommuting and therefcn not at the worksite. or
off due to compressed wcxk week schedules are counted as reporting to
.
.
.
Regulation xm
(2) A carpool is counlled u one divided by the number of
occupants in lhe carpool
(3) A vanpool is counlled u one divided by the number of
occupants in the vanpool
(4) A ~(;)'CIe, aqe.1.1IIOlOrized scooter, or mot<< bike is
counlled u one
(5) Vehicles convened 10 operale on clean alternatiw fuels after
originall.'urchase, where the conversion meets Air Resources Board
certification requirements and the requirements are approved by the federal
En...ito.......a1tal PI(ltQ,:tiOO Agency, sball be usilDCd a specified vehicle
equivalents value by the Air Pollution Control Officer, based on the
emission level identified in the Air Resources Board certification"
(6) The following all are counlled u zero (0) Vehicle Equivalents: .
(i) Public transit (bus, Iipt rail, cammuter rail, feny)
(ii) Buspool
(ill) Bicycle
(iv) Walking or other non-motorized transponation modes
(v) Employees 1elecommuting (only the days those
employees are 1ekcotnanating fOl'the entire day)
(vi) Employees who work a c:ompressed work week
schedule (only on their co.nplessed day(s) off)
(vii) Disabled employee vehicles specially equipped to
accOl",'''Xla1e the disability
(viii) Electric ""hit'lI>. and other zero emission vehicles
originally manufactured u zero emission vehicles
(ix) Business lrips directly from home to a location other than
the worksite
(x) A vehicle in which an employee lepOab 10 the worksite
outside the PTP
.
Vehicle-Equivalent Days equals the sum, over the five weekdays, of the
Vehicle Equivalent usigned to the cornmU1e mode used by each employee each
day of a Survey Week. For e>'.~le, an employee who starts work during the
PTP and miws at the wodai1e each weekday in a single-occupant-whicle
counts u five (5) Vehicle-Equivalent Days. Alternatively, an employee who
starts work duringlhe PTP and arrives at the worksi1e in a two-person carpool
two weekdays, rides transit two weekdays, and driws alone one weekday
counts U 2.00 Vebic1e-Equivalent Days(VEDs) u follows:
"D-8\
-7-
Rule 1301
Regulation xm
Two-person carpool - O.S vehicle equivalents x 2 days
Aljdcs transit - zero (0) vehicle equivalents x 2 days
Drives alone - 1.0 vehicle equivalents x 1 day
= 1.00 VED
= 0.00 VED -..
= 1.00 VED
2.00 VED
(D) Multi-site A VR A ~~i: Employers with multiple worIcsites
filing Consolidated A VR Reports and groups of employers filing Collective
A VR Reports shall calculate average A VR as follows:
The weighted A VR average b the multiple worltsites is calculated by 1)
adding together the "Employee-Days" for each worksite, 2) adding together the
"Vehicle-Equivalent Days" beach worksite, then 3) dividing the aggregate
"Employee-Days" by the aggregate "Vehicle-Equivalent Days" to obtain the
weighted A VR average.
When the multiple worksites are in more than one target area, the A VR
Target that the worlcsltes must meet, shall be the weighted average of the A VR
Targets for the target areas involved weighted by the number of employees at
the involved employers in each target area. The average A VR Target for
multiple worksites in I11OI'e than one target area shall be calculated as follows:
Total ED/[ED AfI'argetA + EDBfI'argets + EDc/I'argetc]
where:
Targetx
EDx
Total ED
= A VR Target for Target Area X
= Total Employee-Days at Employers in Target Area X
= The total of the Employee-Days at all the involved
Employers in all the Target Areas
"""\
(E) Vehicle-Equivalent lll'itnction rVER) for Satellite Worksites:
A Y.ehicle-Equivalent Reduction will be given to those employers that
reduce emissions by the establishment of satellite worlcsites in closer
proximity to employee residences. VER for satellite worksites can be
calcUlated as follows:
VER - <EDslA VRa - EDsIA VRt> (1 - DsIDp)
where:
.
VER = is the totall'lOjec:ted reduced Vehicle Equivalents
EDs - the number of Employee-Days currently associated with the
employer's primary worlcsite that will be transferred to a
satellite worksite
A VRa - the A VR level the employees to be transferred to the satellite
are c:mrently achieving
A VRt - the A VR Target for the primary worksite
~
n-~~
-8-
Rule 1301
.
Os - the average <YWnm1lt,e distance between the satellite woricsite
, and the residences of the employees to be transferred
Dp
- the a~F OOo.un.lle disrance 10 the primary worltsite of the
employees transf....ed 10 the satellite worIcsite
The resulting reduction in Vehicle Equivalents can be used as a
VER credit that is subtracced from the Vehicle-Equivalent Days in
calculating A VR ICC01'ding to the following equation:
A VR - [EDI(VED - VER)]
.
where:
E> ... is the total number of Employee-Days, including the number
of Employee-Days transferred to the satellite worksite
VED ... the total VehicIe-EquiwJent Days far both the primary and
satellite worIcsices
For example, an employer that employs 1,000 employees at a
Centre City Planning Area (CCPA) worlaite may wish to establish a
satellite worltsite where 200 employees will work rather than at the
CCPA worksite. The A VR level the 200 employees are currently
achieving at the primary worItsite is 1.4 and the A VR Tqet for the
primary worIcsite is 1.5. The aver&F commute distance to the primary
worltsite for these 200 employees is 25 miles, but would be reduced to
five miles for the satellite worlcsite. The trip reduction credit would be
calcu1aced as follows:
VER = (200 x 5 /1.4 - 200 x 5 /1.5)(1 - 5/25) = 38 Vehicle Equivalents Reduced
Then, assuming that for each day of the five-ciay survey week, the
1,000 employees mive during the PIP in the equivalent of 750 vehicles,
the A VR for the primary worltsite would be calculated as follows:
E> ... 1000 x 5 - SOOO
VED -750x5 -3750
A VR - SOOO ED / (3750 VED - 38 VER) ... 1.35
(2) REQUIRED ACTIONS
(i) New Hire Orientation Procram. Employers shall provide all new
hires widt a commute alcematives information pICkeL T() assist e:t.~:::e
JRP&rin, commute allaDative hd"... n-tion pICkets, Transportation nt
Associal1oos, C'nmrn.__ Computer, and the ~ n......'ld Management
(TOM) Program Administratar will have infcrmaIion Ibout ..ou....lte alcematives.
The DeW hire informaIioa pICket Ihall iDclude but DOl be limiled 10 information about
the followina topics, as "I'JII"t&We to the specific warbite:
o Alcemative Transportation incentives offered to employees by the employer
o Alternative Work Hour programs offered to employees by the employer
,
.
Regulation xm
1)-23
-9-
Rule 1301
o Oosite lI.....n;Qes and information resoun:es
~
."
o Air quality, lraffic congestion, (Y1I11mn\e costs, and other conditions that
necessitate roM strategies.
o CaJpool matching services
o Bus, trolley and rail service to the wOlbite vicinity
o Bicycle facilities including bicycle routes, lockers, racks, showers and
dressing areas in the wOIbite vicinity
o New Hire Transponation SID'Vey
(n) Employee Transportation Demand Management (TDM) Infor.
mation. Each employer shall develop and maintain employee roM information that
provides all employees with current information regarding commute options and
rideshare services available to them. Such information shall be accessible and
available at each worltsite. Employers may simply establish a centrally located
bulletin board or kiosk for display of information. As an alternative, electronic
bulletin boards, company newsletters, and other communication delivery methods
may be used.
Employee roM informAtUv. shall include but not be limited to the following
items, as appropriate to the specific wOlbite:
o List of Alternative Transportation incentives offered to employees
~
o List of Alternative Work HolD' programs offered to employees
o Alternative Transportation I'luuaJlional material
o Information on carpool marching services
o Space for carpool and vanpool riders-wanted advertisements
o Transit pass information
o Information about bus, trolley, and rail service to the worlcsite vicinity
,
~
o Information about bicycle facilities, including bicycle routes, lockers, racks,
showers and dressing areas in the worksite vicinity
A ~ for updating the ~loyee roM information shall also be provided.
The Employee Transportation Coordinator (ETC) is suggested as the 19}1lupliate
person to maintain the system.
(Iii) Employee Transportation Coordinator (ETC), Each employer
shall desiJIWC an ETC for each worksite to serve as a 1iaison between the imple-
menting agencies, the employer, and between the employer and its employees. An
employer with multiple wOlbites may designate one ETC for all the wOIbites.
'"""\
Regulation xm
D- 2t-f
-10-
Rule 1301
.
.
.
,.
(3) REPORTING REQUIREMENTS
(i) Each employer shall tile an annual A VR Report with the Air Pollution
Conlrol Officer er the applicable delepted lDM Propam Administraror.
(Ii) A VR ~ shall be submiaed acc:ordini to thC filing schedule
established by the Air Pollution Con1lOl Officer er the applicable delegated lDM
Program Administrator.
(Iii) Late A VR Reports are subject to penalties as staled in Section (g) of
this Rule.
(iv) An employer may choose to file a consoJi~1ed A VR Report for all its
worksi~s. 01' panicipa~ in a collective A VR Report, provided the data are shown
separa~ly by worksite.
(v) A VR Survey Method
(A) To file an A VR Repon, employers shall collect necessary data by a
written survey of all subject employees. For employers with 1.000 or more
employees at a worksite. a statistically accurate random sampling survey
methodology may be approved by the Air Pollution Control Officer er the
applicable delegated lDM Program Administratcr. Where a random sample of
the employees are surveyed, the sample size shall be large enough to achieve
statistically significant confidence levels for the employer as a whole.
(B) The requiJed standard survey fann will be made available by
Commuter Computer upon request. Employers shall collect the completed
survey forms. Employers shall submit the original employee survey forms.
together with an A VR: Report Form fer each worksi~. to the Air Pollution
Control Officer er the applicable delegated lDM Program Administrator for
processing. If the employer elects to utilize the services of Commuter Com-
puter to process the employee survey forms. the <riginaI survey fonns shall be
submitted to Commuter CclaI1)uter for ~..i"g. and the survey forms need
not be submitted with the A vR Report to the Air Pollution Control Officer or
the applicable delegated roM Program Administrator.
(C) A VR Rcp<rts shall include survey responses from at least 75% of
the employees ~pudillg to each worksite durin. the PI'P. An employer that
does not achieve at least a 75% survey response rate from employees reporting
to the worksi~ durin. the PI'P may resurvey those employees who did not
respond, in order to achieve at least a 75% survey response rate. Otherwise.
nonrespondents below the requiJed 75% response rate will be counted as
single occupant vehicles.
.
(D) The survey shall cover a typical five-consecutive-\\Tr"'''~y period,
representative of typica1 worksi~ employee ICtivities. that does not include a
holiday 01' border a holiday weekend. For example. neither the week preceding
DOI'the week following Laber Day weekend shall be considered a typical week.
(vi) A VR Report Contents
(A) The A VR Report shall include the completed A VR Report Fonn.
The A VR Report Form shall indic_ the total number of employees at the
Regulation xm
1)-3.5
-11-
Rule 1301
worksite, the number of employees scheduled to rcpon to the worlcsite during
tI\C PIP (documented in a m""Mf satisfactory to the Air Pollution Control
Officer or delegated roM Program ,4t1..,;"i~o:aur, such as an employee roster
which includes wark schedules, or an employee handbook, company policy
manual, or collective bargaining agreement which establishes work schedules for
employees or groups of employees), and the number of coml~'i-ted surveys
retilmed for employees .e}lOating to 1hc worksite during the . The A VR
Report shall include all original e~loyee survey forms, unless the employer
utilizes the services of Cnmmuter COmputer to process the survey forms, in
which case 1hc original survey forms sha11 be submitted to Cnmmuter Computer.
(B) The A VR Report shall show mival times and CODUDute travel modes
for each employee who rcpotb to the wlXksite during the PIP and the calcu-
lation of A VR for each wlXksite.
(C) The employer shall include the completed Employer RidCsharing
Incentives Survey Form in the A VR Report. This survey assists the employer
and 1hc Air Pollution Control Officer or the applicable delegated roM Program
,4t1.m"istrator in determining which roM Actions arc proving to be the most
successful.
'""'"
(vii) Consolidated A VR Reports
(A) An employer may file a Consolitl..ted A VR Report for its multiple
worksitcs, provided that each worksite is represented and described separately.
(B) A VR Report Forms arc required for each worksite included in a """.
Consolidated A VR Report.
(C) Worlcsite Summary Forms arc required for Consolidated A VR
Reports.
(D) For Employers filing a ConsoHtI..tl'(! A VR Re~ that meets the
Weighted Average A VR Target, each worksite that has failed to meet its
individual A VR Target is not required to submit a roM Plan.
(E) If the Consolitl..t..A A VR Report fails to meet 1hc Weighted Average
A VR Target, then each worlcsite that has individua11y failed to meet its A VR
Target shall be required to submit a roM Plan.
(viii) Collective A VR Reports
(A) A group of employers may file a Collective A VR Report in a
co1Icctive effort through a 1'ransportatico Management Association!
Organization (TMAITMO). Each employer and each employer's worlcsites
stum be surveyed separately. An employer in the group that has additional
worksites outside the aeographical area of the TMA/I'MO may include those
worksites in the Co1Icctive A VR Report.
(B) A VR Report Forms arc required for each worksite included in a
Collective A VR Report.
(C) Worlcsite Summ..ry Forms arc required for Collective A VR Reports.
Regulation xm
1)-~0
-12-
Rule 130 I
"""\
.
(D) If a group d employers wilbin a TMAII'MO co1Iec:tive1y meet the
Weighted Average A VR Target, then each worbile that bas failed 10 meet its
iDdividual A VR Target is not rcqund 10 submit a TOM Plan.
(E) If the CoIIectiw A VR Repttt fails 10 IDIlet the Weighted Average
A VR Target, then each worbile that bas iDdividually faiJed 10 meet its A VR
Tatget shall be rcquDed 10 submit a TOM Plan.
(ix) FiUol Scbedule
(A) A VR Repttt due dales shall be established by the Air Pollution
Control Officer or the applicable delegated TOM Program ,4t1rnini.trator. An
employer may petition the Air PoIluticn Control Officer er the applicable
delegated TOM Program Administratcr 10 revise the due date applicable 10 a
workSile for good cause.
(B) Employers will be DOtiJied at least 90 days in advanccby the Air
Pollution Control Officer er the applicable delegated TOM Program Admin-
istrator that an A VR ~ is due. Extensions of the due date may be granled
for good cause by the Air Pollution Control Officer or the applicable delegated
TOM Program Adminis1rator up 10 45 days upon written request.
(C) An employer subject 10 this Rule that docs not receive official
notification from the Air Pollution Control Officer or the applicable delegated
TOM Program Administrator that an A VR Report is due shall submit its first
annual A VR Report no laIer than March 31, 1996.
(D) Employers with worksires having different due daleS may consoli-
date inlO a single due date. The Consolidated A VR Repttt shall be due upon
the earliest due dale fer the worfaites 10 be included in the Consolidated A VR
Repon.
(E) A Collective A VR Report filed by emplo)'ers through a TMA/lMO
shaI1 be due upon tbe earliest due date for the worbites 10 be included in the
Collectiw A VR Rcpon.
(F) A TMAfI'MO may divide the employer warksiles it represents inlO
groups 10 facilitate surveying and d,po.ting. Each group may have a Collective
A VR Report and a separate due date. Each group's Collective A VR Report
shall be due upon the earliest due date for the worksileS 10 be included. The
pouping d worksites by a TMAII'MO cannot be ftI()tIifi~ except IS approved
by the Air Pollution Control Officer or tbe applicable delegated TOM Program
Administrator.
. (0) If an employer is filing an A VR Report through a TMAfl'MO, but
not in a c:oUective effort with odIcr employers. then the A VR Repon shall be
due upon the employer's due date established by the Air Pollution Control
Officer er the applicable de1ep1ed TOM Program Adminis1rator.
(x) The employer's A VR may be recaIcuIalecl and \>c.Jf.kd by the Air Pollution
Control Officer or tbe licable deleaated TOM Program Administrator. The
employer will be ~ if a TOM PIan is rcqund IS a result.
.
.
Regulation xm
n-'87
-13-
Rule 1301
(4) TRANSPORTATION DEMAND MANAGEMENT (TDM) PLAN
REQUIREMENTS
(i) An employer that fails to achieve its A VR Target in FY-96, shall develop,
~. and implement a roM Plan that convincingly demonsll'ates attainment of the
A VR Target by the end of FY -98.
(ii) The roM Plan shall be submitted to the Air Pollution CDntrol Officer or
the applicable delegated roM Program Administralor within 90 days after the date of
receipt of notification from the Air Pollution CDntrol Officer or the applicable dele-
gated roM Program Administralor d. the employer's failure to achieve the A VR
Target. Extensions of the due date may be granted for good cause by the Air Pollu-
tion Control Officer or the applicable delegated roM Program Administrator up to 45
days upon written request. However. in no case shall the due date be later than the
end of FY -96.
(ill) An employer may choose to consolidate required'IDM Plans for more
than one worksite under this requirement.
(iv) Employer roM Plans shall be specific for single worksites. Consolidated
roM Plans shall address each worksite individually.
(v) Late employer roM Plans are subject to penalties as stated in Section (g)
of this Rule.
(vi) TDM Plan Contents. An employer roM Plan shall include the
following:
(A) Listing and description of existing roM Actions in place at the
worksite.
(B) Evaluation of why the existing measures did not succeed in
achieving the A VR Target.
(C) Statement of which existing roM Actions will be maintained, which
will be eDhanced, and which will be discontinued and why.
(0) Usting and description of new roM Actions that will be imple-
mented at the worksite. which may include but are not limited to those listed in
the Menu of roM Actions [Subsection (d)(4)(vili)).
(E) Implementation schedule for new and enhanced roM Actions.
(vii) TDM Plan Review/Implementation.
-...
.......,
.
(A) Employer roM Plans shall be reviewed by the Air Pollution
Control Officer or the applicable delegated roM Program Adminisll'ator to
ensure the plan is complete and wodtable and is likely to achieve the applicable
A VR Target by the end of FY -98.
(8) In cases in which an employer submits a consolidated employer
roM Plan for multiple worksites. each worksite will be ~viewed individually.
(C) Employer roM Plans shall be implemented within 30 days of -"""\
approval by the Air Pollution Control Officer or the applicable delegated 'IDM
Regulation xm
1)-28
-14-
Rule 1301
.
Program Administrator. Extensions of the implementation date may be granted
for good cause by the Air Pollution Control Officer or the applicable delegated
lDM Program Administrator upon wriaen request
(0) Rejecled lDM Plans sball be revised and resubmitted within 30 days
of notification. After notification, failure 10 submit an acceptable plan within 30
days willsubjec:t the employer 10 penalties as staled in Section (g) of this Rule.
(E) The provisions of any approved lDM Plan sball continue in effect
until superseded by a subsequent TDM Plan that convincingly demonstrates
Ittainment of the A VR Target by the end of FY -98, subject 10 the approval of
the Air Pollution Control Officer or the applicable delegated lDM Program
j\tl.mnistrator.
(F) If an employer meets its applicable A VR Target, the lDM Plan may
be amended 10 delete any measures not yet implemented, subject to the approval
of the Air Pollution Control Officer or the applicable delepted lDM Program
Administrator.
(viii) Menu or Transportation Demand Manalement (TDM) Actions
(A) Pm:pose. The following menu provides a variety of Transportation
Demand Management Actions that an employer may choose to implement to
help achieve its A VR Target. An employer is not limited 10 the actions listed
here.
.
(B) Alternative Work Hour ProJl'llI11s.
(1) Compressed work week schedule
(i) Three 12-hour weekdays with two weekdays off (3/36)
(ii) Four 100hour weekdays with one weekday off (4140)
(Ui) Eight 9-hour weekdays, one 8-hour weekday and one
weekday off every two weeks (9180)
,
(2) Flextime available to employees who rideshare
.
(C) Tran~tinn UAnA~nt AanM.ri~ni7J1rion Membership.
(0) General Incentives.
(1) "Guaranteed ride home" program for employees who rideshare
(2) Transportation allowance in lieu of parking or transit subsidies
(3) AwaJdsIrecosnitiOll/boDus to employees who use alternative
0..-.... ..1l1e DXXies
.
(4) Provide f1eet vehicles for ridesharers
(S) Provide rental vehicles (hourly basis) for persona1 business
Regulation xm
TI- ~9
-IS-
Rule 1301
Regulation xm
(6) Provide shuttle service to relail and/or transit centers .-"
(E) Transit
(1) Transit pass sales at worbite
(2) Subsidized passes
(3) "Occasional-use" parking pennits for regular transit users
(F) Cln1)OOl.
(1) Parking subsidy for carpoolers
(2) Maintain. current carpool matching list
(3) Carpool bulletin board
(4) Provide company vehicles
(0) VanpoollBulijlOOl.
(1) Provide company vehicles
(2) Subsidize private vehicles
(3) Subsidize vanpool passenger fares .-"
(H) Bicyclin~.
(1) Provide Bicycle Incentive Allowance
(2) Bike lockers at worksite
(3) Showerllocker facilities
(4) Improve bike access to worksite
(I) WalkinS[.
(1) Provide Walking Incentive Allowance
(2) ShowerJlocker facilities
. (3) Improve pedestrian access to worksite
(J) T~lN:t; .uuulltinl.
(1) Provide le1ecommuting program and policy
(2) Provide company computers
(3) Subsidize priVale computers .......
D- erO Rule 1301
-16-
. (K) Onsite Amenities.
(1) CIild-c:are
(2) Post oftia:
(3) B."lrill' services
(4) Cafelerialdeli/les1aurant
(5) Fleet vehicles f(]l' employees' use durin. workday
(6) O-muter LounF f<lI' waiting/connecting
(L) Parkin, ManuelN!ftt Slratepes.
(1) PreferenDa1 parking f<lI' carpools and vanpools
(2) Implement paid parkinJ on the worbite with proceeds to fund
Altemalive O_mllte Mode incentives
(3) Limit the availability of all-day on the worbite parking for
single-occupant vehicles
(4) Provide redooed parking pricing for carpools and vanpools
.
(M) Vehicle Miles Traveled fVMTl RMIIM;nn Slrate~es
(1) Reduced employer mrnmute VMT through use of satellite
worksites
, (e) INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE
(1) PROGRAM SUMMARY
Groups of delegated cities desiring to implement and enforce the same trip reduction
ordinance would .tlm;"i$ter the program UDder Joint-Powers Authority (JPA) agreements.
An example would be to use the boundaries of the existing transit districlS as the bound-
aries for two JPAs, which could then use the members of the existing MetropOlitan Transit
Development Board and North County Transit District Boards as their governing boards.
Alternatively, a JPA could involve only two or three cities.
If a city or the county did not wish to join a JPA they would have the option of seeking
delegation froIv the Air Pollution Control District to nm their own program (]I' the Air Pollu-
tion Control District would .tIm;"i~ and enforce the program within their jurisdiction.
Subreaional implemcnwioll shou1d allow cities to combine resoun:es and provide
more uniform administration than implementalion by individual cities.
.
Regulation xm
1)-ClI
-17-
Rule 1301
(2) PARTICIPANTS
(i) Air Pollution Control Board
(A) Comoosition
-..,
County Board of Supervisors (as designa1ed by state law).
(B) Functions
(1) Adopts regulations implementing the program.
(2) Delegates implementation of the trip reduction regulation to
cities/county if an implementation plan (that could reflect a JPA) is
submitted which provides adcql'''te resources to adopt and enforce the
measure; the implementation plan is approved; and, the delegated entity
adopts and implements a program with requirements identical to those in
the regulation adop1ed by the Air Pollution Control District.
The Air Pollution Control District may revoke a delegation if it
determines that the performance of the delega1ed entity is inconsistent
with the previous provisions or otherwise inadequate to implement the
trip reduction regulation adop1ed by the Air Pollution Control District.
(3) Appoints members of the Regional Hearing Board from nomi-
nations provided by delegated local and subregional entities and by the Air
Pollution Control District on behalf of non-delega1ed agencies. -..,
(ii) Air Pollution Control District
(A) Contposition
Air Pollution Control Officer and staff
(B r Functions
(1) Prepares regulations for adoption by the Air Pollution Control
Board.
(2) Audits delega1ed IPA's, cities or the county. The purpose of
the audit is to assure the requirements for delegation are met.
(3) Arlmini~ters the program in cities/county that have not re-
. quested or received delegation, or in which delegation has been revoked.
(4) Staffs the Regional Coordinating Committee and identifies
needed changes in the regional regulations for refeml to the Regional
Coordinating Committee and Air Pollution Control Board.
(ill) JP A Governing Boards
(A) Contpo~ition
The IPA governing boards would be composed of elected officials.
.......,
Regulation xm
D-gz
-18-
Rule 1301
.
.
.
Regulation xm
(B) Functions
(1) The aoveminI boInIs of the JPAs wouldllllmini.ter the
program fer member cities. 'Ibis would include the establishment of a
budget, guidelines IIId policies 10 provide for and direct the staff in the
application and enforcement of tbe 1rip reduction ~JUlation in the
confQl'lftll"<:e with provisions of deleption.
(2) Each JPA aoveming board would designate members to serve
on the Regional Coordinating Commi~. Each aowrDin, board would
appoint its own lIlChnical rommil1ee,lIId provide nominations for the
Regional Hearing Boud.
(3) The JPA govemin, boards could serYe to foster conununica-
tions between cities and the Air Pollution Control Boerd, however this
should in no way inhibit or ~strict direct C(lO.'.....lIicalions between
individual cities and the Air Pollution Centrol Board.
(4) The JPA board would identify F'eedoed changes in the ~gional
~gu1ation fer ~ferral to the Air Pollution Control Board and the Regional
Coordinating Committee.
(iv) Reponal Coordinatina Committee
(A) Conmosition
(1) The Regional Coordinating Committee would consist of seven
elected ofticials from implementing entities, and no more than two from
non-delegated agencies. The implementing agencies shall determine the
membership of the Committee in case of disputes.
(2) The Air Pollution Control District would staff the Regional
Coordinating Cnmmittee.
(B)' Functions
.
(1) The Regional Coordinating Committee would address and
develop solutions 10 any significant inconsistencies in application and
enforcement of tbe ~&ulation between implementing ennties. Solutions
requiring ~gulattxy changes will reqm Air Pollution Centrol Board
lIdion. Administrative solutions would be implemented through the local
and subregional entities, and the Air Pollution Centrol District.
(2) The Regional Coordinating Committee would ~view all trip
m1uction ~gu1ation related items 10 be considered by Air Pollution
Control Boanl.
(3) The Regional Coordinatin& Committee would provide a
JP.<'1WI\""""dllrion on all tbe Air PoJI,mon Centrol District items docketed
for Air Pollution Control Board c:onsideradon concerning tbe trip
m1uction ~gulation.
D-<13
-19-
Rule. 1301
(v) JPA Technical Committee (One in each JPA)
(A) Conlposition
SANDAG, CALTRANS, transit operatorS, city staffs, TMAs, employers
and interest groups.
(B) Functions
The Technical Cotmnittee would be advisory to the JP A Governing Board
in the implementation of program regulations.
(vi) Regional Hearing Board
(A) Conlposition
A Regional Hearing Board will be established as specified by state law
(including a doctor, a lawyer and an engineer, as well as two public members).
The intent will be to maintain a ba1anced representation of community per-
spectives in the appointment of members to the Regional Hearing Board.
Regional Hearin, Board members will be nominated by delegated local and
subregional entines and by the Air Pollution Control District on behalf of the
non-delegated agencies, and then be appointed by the Air Pollution Conttol
Board. The list of nominees should be larger than the number of Regional
Hearing Board positions avai1able.
,
.-.
The legal counsel to and clerk functions for the Regional Hearing Board
ere to be provided by County Counsel and the Clerlc of the Air Pollution
Control Board, who are familiar with procedures and related law. Staff of the
delegated local and subregional entities or the Air Pollution Control District will
review items on the Regional Hearing Board agenda within their geographic
area of responsibility, make recommendations and present those recommenda-
tions before the Regional Hearing Board.
(B) Functions
The Regional Hearing Board would provide final resolution of actions
regarding application of the provisions of the TOM regulation. Judicial review
of Regional Hearing Board decisions would be handled as provided in state law
(petition to superior coun).
(vii) Staffing
The affected JPA would provide staff to address matters before the Regional
Hearing ~oard, and would provide staff for the technical committees and the JP A
Governing Boards. This staffing could consist of personnel employed by the JP A.
or could be contributed by member agencies and the county. Air Pollution Control
District would provide staff for the Regional Coordinating C1'llTlmittee.
(f) DELEGATION OF PROGRAM
(1) A city or county may request the Air Pollution Control Board to delegate au-
thority for the implementation and operation of an employer-based trip reduction ""'"
program, as allowed under Ca1ifornia Health and Safety Code, Division 26, Part 3,
Regulation xm
D-qJ.{
-20-
Rule 1301
""'"
.
Chapter 6, Subsection 4(]'J l7(e). Requests fOl' such deleption of authority must be
receiVed on or before December 1, 1994, OJ' December 1 rL the fiscal year pn:ceding the
year in which the city OJ' county wishes to implement its own program, whichever is
later. Approval of such a =lucst may be granted by the Air Pollution Control Boani
upon condition that:
(i)' The city 01' county adopts and submits to the District a local employer-
based trip reduction ordinanCe with =luirements identical to those in this Rule.
(li) The city OJ' county submits to 1he District an implementation plan for the
employer-based trip reduction program which provides lIdequate resources to
implement, monitor, and enforce the provisions of the city's OJ' county's employer-
based trip reduction ordinance.
(lii) An employer with multiple WOIbites which are Jor.soted within the.
jurisdictions of IJlOIe than one implementing agency may elect to report to the Air
Pollution Control District ins1ead of reporting to IJlOIe than one implementing
agency.
(2) The Air Pollution Control Boani may revoke a delegation under this Rule if it
determines that 1he perfonDance of 1he delegaled local agency is inadequale to implement
this Rule.
(g) ENFORCEMENT
An employer that fails to file an annual A VR Report or lDM Plan when due shall be
in violation of this Rule. Each day in which the employer fails to file the A VR Repon or
TDM Plan, following the dale when due, shall constitule a separate and additional violation
of this Rule. An employer that fails to achieve its A VR Target and fails to implement its
TOM Plan is in violation of this Rule. Violation of this provision shall subject the em-
ployer to the penalties established by law. [See especially Health &: Safety Code Section
42402.] If an employer complies with all pr'C!visions of this Rule, but fails to meet its A VR
Target, such failure is not a violation of this Rule.
(h) AUDITING AND RECORD KEEPING
(1) All employers subject to this Rule and all employers subject to a delepled local
trip reduction ()TtI;"RIIl'e approved by the Air Pollution Control Baud under Section (f) of
this Rule, are subject to random OIlSlle audits to verify compliance with this Rule by the Air
Pollution Control Officer, and by 1he delegaled implementing agency, if applicable. The
Air Pollution Control Officer 01' the ~licable delegaled lDM Program Adminis1rator may
require an employer to ~ such information u is necessary to verify emplayment data,
A VR, and implemental10n of required actions. An employer ,hall compile and retain for a
period of three.Jelll'S all records reuonably necessary to document employee population,
employee travel surveys, vehicle counts, CI!pOOI and vanpool subsidies, transit pus sales
and subsidies, parking policies and revenues, and the marke~lof and participation in .
incentive.Jll'Ofl'llDS. Rec:on:Is fOJ' the most recent two years be kept at the worksile or
with the Employee 'I'ransponatioI Coordinata (ETC). Records for the thiJd year may be
kept at any other convenient loc~ within San DieJO County, provided they are
accessible to the Air Pollution Control Officer.
.
.
(2) The Dis1rict shall verify that a city or county which is ::rcted authority under
Section (f) of this Rule for 1he implementation and operation of a trip reduction pr0-
gram hu implemented meuures to ensure compliance with this Rule. A city OJ' county
Regulation xm
D-q5
-21-
Rule 1301
..
~:
which is delegated authority under Section (f) of this Rule, for the implementation and
operation of a local trip reduction program is subject to TIIMom OIISite audit to verify com-
pliance with this Rule. Tbe Air Pollution CoobOl Officer may require a city or county to
provide such information as is necessary to verify the adequacy of municipal monitoring
and enforcement efforts. teSOU!'CeS, employer coverage and employment data, progress
toward achieving required A VR levels. program implementalion, or the performance of
specific employers. A city or county that has been delegated authority under this Rule,
shall compile and retain for a period of five years all records telative to municipal monitor-
ing and enforcement actions, employer coverage, employee population, employee travel
surveys, vehicle counts, the implementation and success of employer trip reduction actions.
and other evidence of the effectiveness of the city's 01' county's trip teduction ordinance.
(i) SUNSET CLAUSE
This Rule shall become inoperative, and any delegation under Section (f) shall be
tescinded immediately upon notice to the San Diego Air Pollution Control District from the
federal Environmental Protection Agency of either of the following:
(1) The federal Environmental Protection Agency disapproves this Rule. or
(2) 1be federal Environmental.Pt~on Agency IeClassifies the San Diego ozone
nonanainment atea from Sevete to Serious.
.
Regulation xm
D-qeo
-22-
Rule 1301
-...
~
"""
.
.~".IIII
un" If IU lIEU
January 1994
Board allocates $8.8 million
to fund local .programs to cut smog
Eighteen kx:al pmgrams wiD
naive $8.8 million in funds to
muce pollution from motor
vehicles in action taken by the Air
Pollution ContIOl Board last mcnI:h.
The smog<utting programs
include two pnot projects to scrap
and retrofit old cars; the pwchase
of compressed natural gas and
e1ectrIc vehldes; and ridesharing
and telecommuting projects to
areduce vehicle trips. Sixty ~
WMSan Diego's smog-forming .
pollutants come from motor
vehicle emissions.
The source of the funding is a
special pool of money from a $2
vehicle Jegistratlon fee. The annual
lee is collected to implement
innovative projects to muce auto
emissions.
The Board allocated $700.000
to San Diego Environmental
Exchange for an old-car buyback
and scrapping program. The pUot
project will pay $700 each for 1.000
pre-1982 vehicles that lift! in
driving condition and have been
registered in San Diego County for
at least one year.
Neutronics Enterprises, Inc.,
was awarded $273.000 for a pnot
program to retrofit pre-1983
vehicles with advanced catalytic
Board sets January 18 for vote
on trip reduction program
early January 1994 in order for the
state Air Resources Board (ARB) to
submit the rule to the Environ-
mental ProtectionAgency (EPA)
by July 1994. U the July deadline is
missed, the EPA may withhold
federal highway funds or Impose
leIIere restrictions on industrial
expansion in San Diego Count}t
The EPA is currently reviewing
the District's request to muce San
Diego's federal smog classification
from severe to ~ as the ARB
did for the region'. state classifica-
tion in July. (Set rdattd story ptlge
3.) U the EPA approves the
(conti1lutd on ptlge 2)
The Air Pollution Control
Board has set January 18 to vote on
the adoption of Regulation XIII,
the employer trip reduction pro-
gram newly revised to meet
federal Clean Air Act requirements
; for worbites with 100 or more
employees. The regulation is
designed to reduce the number of
1010 commuters and increase the
number of employeea who work
compressed work weeks, carpool,
.anpoo), walk, bicycJe, tele-
commute or talce public transit to
work.
The District has asked the
Board to adopt the regulation by
D-CJCZ
emlaslon CClIlIrOl aystemI dudng a
~year program to test the
equipment'. durabWt}t U the
retrofit equIpment plUYll effec-
tive, it may pJUYide an option for
older veh1des that would otbea--
wise not pass the ltale IIIlOg
check.
The MetropoUtan 'hnslt
Development Board (MTDB) wu
awarded $1.9 million for the
pwchase of 6S natural-gu buaes to
replace old diesel buseI, $600.000
for a $10 transit fare subsidy for
college students, and $86.000 to
provide a $S subsidy to expll!ll
bus commuters.
North County 'nansit will
naive $79,400 to establish a work
trip bus servic2 from Vista 'nansit
Center to the South Vista Indus-
trial Park.
The Board awarded $1.12 ,
million to the County of San DIego
to provide video telecanfe1endng
between criminal offenders at
Probation Department olfices in
South Bay, San Diego and El
Cajon, and Public Defender oIices
in San Diego and El Cajon.
. The City of Chula Vista will
reG!lve $179,750 to launch a satel-
lltework c:enteJ: This will allow
publk: and private employees who
live nearby to work lram the
center instead of driving to work.
The dty wu alto funded $20.000
to replace two gas-fueled parking
enforcement vehides with electric
(continutd on ptlge 2)
~_.-..-- .
Board allocates funds to cut smog
(amtimllll from pilI' I)
evebidel and $20,000 to lest four
eIectrk: t1eet vehideI for use In
mUllklpal operaliOlll and by local
bull-- -If
SIn DIego GIla.: Electric was
awarded $1.1...nuon topwdlue
or convert 500 f1eet vehideI to
natuJal pi IIld to establish be
natuJal-su fueling statiOIlI.
The Board allocated approxi-
maIeIy $2.1 million for countywide
employer trip JeCiucticl1 pmgrams
to the Thu.sportatlon Management
AsIodatlon (TMA) Adviaory
COUIldI, SIn Diego AIIod-tion of
Governments, Air ponution Con-
trol District (APCD), IIld the City
of San Diego. Of that amount, the
TMAAdvisory Coundl will utilize
$402,S32 to train employers on trip
reduction strategies; publish a
monthly newspaper with classified
ads for rideshare partners; offer
e finandallncentives for tele-
commuting; and ClUte a regional
network of 20 natural-gu
vanpoola.
The balance of the trip reduc-
tion allocation Includes $322.468 to
pay for administration IIld imple-
mentation of the transportation
control measures; $615,000 for
future trip reduction rule adminis-
tration by local governments;
$75,000 for commuter market
research by the City of San Diego;
IIld $724,380 for a countywide
public Information campaign to
promote trip reduction.
The Board allocated $120,000
to the APCD for a program con-
tract to Identify Mexican vehicles
that regularly commute aaoss the
border without obtaining Callfol'-
nIa smog checks. The APCD also
zecelved ssS,ooo to develop proto-
e type transportation management
plans to help employers meet
future trip reduction requi1ements.
Another $60,000 was allocated to
accelerate the Introduction of a
rule to allow IndusIry to pwdlue
INl scrap old vebk:Ies for emIs-
lion JeCiudian aed1ts.
Other aIlocationllnclude
S86,ooo to the CIty 01 SIn DIego
for the pmdlase 01 six natura1-gu
vebkIes. The vebIdes will supply
IhuttIe service to the ChoIIas
Operations Csdl!r IIld pmvide
enployeel with a paraNeed ride
hame. County 1taNIt ServIces also
aecelved $15,700 to provide a
pannIIIIcl ride hame pRlSIU' for
camnulerelqtl.!i11 bus~
who.-d to work late.
Board to vote on trip reduction plan
(amlimllll from ptIge 1)
Dlstrict's request. SIn DIego
CountywouJd no bIpr be.
qulred to Implement a federal trip
reduction program. Instead, a
more flexible program would be
developed to tneet state trip
JeCiuction goals.
Major changes to the mguIa-
tion Include:
. The Average Vehicle Rider-
ship (AVR) taJget for worksites
with 100 or more employees has
been lowered from 1.75 to 1.41, the
minimum neceSSITY to tneet
federal Clean Air Act require-
ments. To achieve this, submgional
AVR targets have been proposed.
for the following &IUS: 1.5 for
center dty San Diego; 1.41 for the
rest of San Diego IIld other cities
in the county; and 13 for the
unincorporated areas. (AVR is
calculated by dividing the number
of employees at a worbite by the
number of cars they drive to the
worbite.)
. Implementation of the
regulation will be deferred until
July 1995 for both the private IIld
public sector (Including school and
college employees). .
. Employers must develop IIld
submit a orw-time plan for II!view
IIld App'OrJGl by July 1996. The
plan must describe the strategies
the employer intends to use to
achieve the AVR target by July
1998. Employers will still be
required to conduct annual SUI'-
veys to monitor progress.
D-qq
-There wiD be no fees ctwpl
to busi1lesseI for submitting
IUrvey' .~ or trip lIIduction
plans. The administrative costs
will be paid fram vehk:Ie mgistra-
tion funds.
. The employer option to
Implement spedfk pm-approved
meuures instead of deve10pirlg an
employer plan has been elimi-
nated. Employers who attended
District workshops expressed
concern about the measwes' cost.
They preferred to write their own
plans rather than Implement the
District's pre-approved measures.
The proposed regulation is
expected to reduce 364 tons of
smog-forming emissions per year
in the SIn DIego air basin, afec:t
approximately 30% of the county'.
workforce, and eliminate an
estimated 75,000 motor vehicle
trips per day In 1998.
The Board may consider one of
three variations flam the proposed
JegUlation Including:
1. Implement the pJOgl'llR for
f10th private and public sector
employers in 1995 with pre-
approved optional measures.
2. Implement the pJOgl'llR for
public lector employers In 1994
IIld private sector employers In
1995 without pre-approved
optional measures.
.3. Implement the pJOgl'llR for
pubIk: sector employers in 1994
IIld private sector employers In
1995 with pre-approved optional
measures.
District asks federal EPA
4110 reclassify San Diego
'J1le AIr PoDutllln CardIol
DIstrict hili uked the Envimn-
menIlIl FroleC:tIonApncy (ErA) to
lower the San Diego air basin'.
DQIHlttalnment area ......Uiaotlan
for OZOM (photochemical smog)
from leVee to aerIouI.
A cJet'lmftl\ from EPA Is ex-
pected early tb1I fIB
'J1le atate AIr ReIoun:eI Board
(ARB) baa already changed ita
,.1....nRaotion of San Diego to
aerious.
StudIes by the ARB and the
District detemdned that days
when San Diego'. smog levels
exceeded .15 ppm were due to
"transport" - pollution blown
southward from the Los Angeles
air basin. DIstrict .taff analyzed all
. days between 1989 and 1992 in
which smog levels exceeded .15
parts per million (ppm) - a total
of 3S days.
Under the California Clean Air
Act, San DIego Is not required to
controlloca1 emission sowces to
compensate for transport pollution
from L.A. After eliminating the
impact of transport upon San
Diego'. smog levels, the ARB
concluded that the classification
ahou1d be changed to serious.
'J1le new .tate classification
will have the following benefits:
. Reduce the pertormance
JeqWrement for the employer hip
Jeductian program from an
average vehicle occupancy of 1.5
to 1.4 by 1999;
. Avoid the Clean Air Act
zequJrement to Jeduce the overall
! population expoaure to ambient
. pollutant levels in exm. of aped-
fled levels in certain years;
. lnaease the emIsaion thresh-
old for no net inaeaSe in non-
attainment pollutanta (hydrocar-
boN and oxJ..... of nibuaQ,) for
new or m~lfIed ICIUIteI from 10
to 15 tcm per fIB AI a nault,
approximately 100 permit appUca-
tklna per year will no larIger be
aubject to this proviakln.
'J1le ARB has also written the
IlnvircNrleDta1 FrotectianApncy
(ErA) asking them to COmlCt a
nportIng error and reduce San
DIego'. federal smog classlflcatian
from aevere to serious based on
the "5 per cent option."
The ErA classification of .19
ppm Is based on the fourth highest
smog level recorded between. 1987
and 1989 at the Del MarmonitOl'-
ing station. The actual measure-
ment was .185 ppm, but computer
IOftware automatlca1ly JOUnds up
the data to two-digit figwes.
The cut point between serious
and severe Is .18 ppm. U ttuee-
digits figwes are considered, San
DIego would be within the "5 per
cent option" and could qualify for
the serious designation.
Although ErA does not recog-
nize the influence of transported
pollution, the District believes a
aerious classification Is appropri-
ate, because transport Is a major
influence at the two monitoring
lites with the highest recorded
smog levels (Del Mar and
Oceanside).
U the EPA accepta the serious
designation, buplnesa would be
relieved of several significant
federal requirements:
. The region'. buslnessea with
100 or more employeea will no
lqer be required to meet federal
requirements for Jeducing the
number of vehicles arriving at the
worksite. (5<< rdlJtttl story page 1.)
However, they would still be
aubject to .tate requirements.
D-\OO
-The tI1reaboId. for IIIqUirIng
IederIl operating permita and for
new and 1I1IvllfIM atatkx1ary
IOUJa!I would be SO toN per year
lllatead of 25 tana. About 25 bull-
111111. would 110 b1pr come
UI'Ider the rule.
-The tI1reaboId.lor ~
Induatry to apply IIUClIUIbIy
available pol1ntflwl. COidml techn0l-
ogy would also be 50 toN per year
Instad of 25. .
- Theoffaet~ lor
new and ........lfIM IOUIO!I of
emJaakma would be nl6l1(O'd from
1.3 to 1 to 1.2 to 1.
Enforcement
changes name
to Compliance
The District'. Enfoament
DivIsion has changed ita name.
Now called the Compliance
Division, the DIstrict has inaeased
ita efforta to work with local
buslnessea to l!I'lIURI ongoing
compliance with air pollution
control regulatiClllS.
M part of this endeavor, the
District has initiated a Notke to
Comply program for certain naIe
violations. The Notice to Comply
diHers from a Notice of Violation
in that it does not lISUIt in penal-
ties, provided conection action Is
taken in a tlmeIy IIIl1IU'lS
A Notice of Comply Is issued
primarily for violations that ale
not directly related to the control
of emissions and when! a business
has had no prior knowledge of the
requirements. .
Compliance advisories have
also been Initiated to alert busi-
N!IIeI about new District mguIa-
tions. These aummaries of new
requirements and their impact ale
aent to affected businesseI and
other inteJested parties prior to a
regulation'limp1ementation.
"New office to help small businesses
rc.rin CcIIdreIu hM been aflard to hire a CIlIlIUltant al'ltal 1b cantad the Small "".'lr-.
named to a provisJcrIa1 position as penon to pazH~ In -suJatory I-ItI,...nce ProgrIm. call CCllIb&"
I..t al the Air PoButkIn CClIlb01 devdopmlld md keep them up- at 6H-2288.
District'. Small BuIIneu AIU- to-date an enviranIIlental require-
tara Plogram. The new program mentI.
.. deIIgrIed to make it eaier for -The 0Istrk:t wantI to find
IIll8I1 businBI ownen to undeI'- wa)'l to Il!rVl! the aal1 buIirlesI
Itand and camply with 0Istrk:t MCtor. - he added. -nu. program
ruIeI and resuJatiarll. illntended to do that.-
CcIIdreIu wm act as aliailan To allow prableml and com-
between IIll8I1 buIineu ownen plaintl to be handJecl canfIden-
and the District to I8SOlve Issues tIa1ly, the Small Busirlell Assis-
and problems; provide Informa- tara PI--&1'6Dl wm function
dan, technk:alassiltara, campU- independently of other District
ance training, and courtIIy inspec- progranw.
ticlIII; and make referrals to finan- Prior to Joining the new pro-
da1 and bUllness ft!SOWC1!I. gram, Contreras was a Mnior air
'"The economy of this Jegion pollution irlspec:tor at the District.
and nation iI founded upon small He holds a B.A-In economicI from
business, -laid R. J. Sommerville, CaIlbnIa SCate ~ Pu1IeJtm,
air ponution control officel: -But and Is cumntly in graduate stuelles
~OIt small businesl owners can't at San Diego State University.
~
~
Air Pollution Control District
County of San Diego
9150 Chesapeake Dr.
San Diego, CA 92123
.
Air Pollution Control Bouel
Pam Sla. Chairwoman
Dianne Jacob, VIce<halrwoman
Brian P. Bilbray
Leon L WIlliams
John MacDonald
0....... ~............
1)-101
CALENDAR
"JRlI~1IIIA.lNn
'Dtl. V 0peratbIa '-ill
New Replatlon XlV
.-...1 Ger-.dilli S....1ailBI
New Rule 69
2 p.m. Jmuary 18
County AdminIItratlon Center
Board of SupervlIon Chambers
1600 I'IdfIc Hlgh~ San DII&O
wnIlJC!ilROP
B*IIJ 0nIII-1lul. 67.zt
9 e.m. to U noon January 20
AIr PoUutlon Canbol DiItrkt
ConCerence Room 139
9150 Clesapeab Drive, San DIego
IULK RATE
V.I. POITAOI
PAID
UIIll1EOO. c.wF.
PERMIT NO. 171
.
Aaembly BllI No. JOO8
CHAPTER 633
.
An act to add Section 44011.1 to the Health and Safety Code, and
to amend Section 6700.2 of the Vehicle Code, relating to vehicles.
[Approved by eo-no. September 30, 1M. FIIecI with
Seeretuy 01 SIaIe October 1. 1993.]
LECISLAnVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
AB l!OO8, Alpert. Vehicles: air pollution.
(1) Existing law requires a certificate of compliance or
noncompliance with motor vehicle emission standards.upon the
registration or transfer of registration of specified vehicles powered
by internal combustion engines that are registered within an area
designated for program coverage.
This biU would define the term "registered within an area
designated for program coverage" to include any vehicle registered
pursuant to the Vehicle Code in this state when the registered
owner's mailing or residence address Is not located within this state,
or when the address at which the vehicle Is garaged is not located
within this state. Because a violation of the registration provlsions of
existing law is currently an Infraction. the biU would impose a
state-mandated local program by expanding the scope of an existing
crime.
(2) Existing law authorizes a nonresident daily commuter to
operate a vehicle on the state highways without being registered In
this state If specified conditions are met.
This bill would exempt a resident of a foreign country from the
above authorization.
(3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse
local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the
state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that
reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this
act for a specified reason.
The people of the StJite of CaJjfomja do emIct lIS follows:
SECTION 1. Section 44011.1 II added to the Health and Safety
Code, to read:
44011.1. For purposes of Section 44011, the term "registered
within an area designated for program coverage" Includes any
vehicle registered pursuant to the Vehicle Code In this ltate when
the registered owner's mailing or residence address Is not located
within this state, or when the address at which the vehicle is garaged
is not located within this ltate.
.
l1li Il110
D-I03
.
.
..
,
I
1
Ch. 633
-2-
SEC. 2. Section 6700.2 of the Vehicle Code Is amended to read:
6700.2. (a) Notwithstandlng Section 4000.4, subdivision (a) of
Section 6700, or Section 6702, a nonresident daily commuter may
operate a motor vehicle on the highways of this state only If all of the
following conditions are met:
(1) The motor vehicle Is a passenger vehicle or a commercial
vehicle of less than 6,000 pounds unladen weight with not more than
two axles of the type commonly referred to as a pickup truck.
I (2) The motor vehicle Is used regularly to transport passengen on
the highways of this state principally between, and to and from, the
place of residence in a contiguous state and the place of employment
in this state by the owner of the motor vehicle and for no other
business purpose.
(3) The motor vehicle Is not used in the coune of a business within
this state, includlng the transportation of property other than
incidental personal property between, and to or from, the place of
residence in a contiguous state and the place of employment of the
motor vehicle owner in this state.
(b) The exception to registration of a motor vehicle under the
conditions specified in this section does not supersede any other
exception to registration under other conditions provided by law.
(c) ThIs section does not apply to a resident of foreign country.
SEC. 3. No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to
Section 6 of Article XIII B of the CalIfornia Constitution because the
only costs which may be incurred by a local agency or school district
will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction,
changes the definition of a crime or infraction, changes the peOalty
for a crime or infraction, or elimlnates a crime or infraction.
Notwithstandlng Section 17580 of the Government Code, unless
otherwise specified in this act, the provisions of this act shall become
operative on the same date that the act takes effect pursuant to the
Callfornia Constitution.
o
.
llIi 130
D - lOti
..
..
CHULA VISTA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT
Planning and Facilities Department
M.EMORANDUM
':) ~
c I 7924
DATE March 4, 1994
To:Chula Vista Growth Management Oversight Commission
FROM: Chula Vista Elementary School District
RE: SCHOOL THRESHOLD REPORT - RESPONSE TO CITY'S 12 -18 MONTH
GROWTH FORECAST
RESPONSE TO CITY COUNCIL COMMENTS
REGARDING 1993 STATEMENT OF CONCERN
Comment 1:
.
. "Assist the District In adopting and Implementing expansion of
existing schools In western Chula Vista, partlcularty Vista Square,
Rice and Feaster Schools."
The District continues to be interested in acquiring the vacant four acre parcel adjacent
to Feaster School. However, financing both for acquisition and subsequent
construction continues to be the impediment. At the present time, the only potential
financing appears to be via mitigation for development of the Bayfront. The District has
not been advised of any activity with this project for over one year. Whatever
development is eventually proposed must include the requirement that all impacts on
school facilities be fully mitigated.
Expansion at Vista Square and Rice Schools is also a possibility to assist in alleviating
overcrowding in western Chula Vista. Rice School is on a 14 gross acre site, while
Vista Square is on 10.9 gross acres. As with expansion of Feaster School, funds are
not available.
In addition, the District, Sweetwater and the City of Chula Vista are currently involved in
a study on the impacts various types of development have on school facilities. The
study is being conducted by SourcePoint. ,Preliminary data indicates thAt ~nrollm..nt In
western Chula Vista will continue throuah 2QQQ.._~,_~ine 0~,.1~J1el(tten""y~ars.
. 'AS lms data _ tl!. nm6!~..!nd further analyzed, it may assist the Dililtrict in making
. decisions as 'to whethes tociiristrUcrpermaneiit facllitiesl" these areas or utilize
----
E-I
GMOC-93
Page 2
relocatable classrooms. Given the cost factors of both options, and the shortage of
funding, relocatables may be more feasible. """"\
Comment 2:
"Continue to urge the District to actively explore means to alleviate
school overcrowding through Innovative methods and techniques
such as multi-track scheduling. Such scheduling Is also a factor In
the provision of State financing for new schools, which the School
Board should consider In Its decision."
To date, twenty-four schools have been involved in growth planning studies and
prepared growth plans. Most school plans contain year-round multi-track comJ:lonents
to be analyzed when the school reaches a certain eapacify. It is not f1nandaiiy feasi6le-
to implement multi-track until a school population exceeds its capacity by at least 20
percent. The District continues to evaluate multi-track as a method to accommodate
excess enrollment.
In terms of the State Construction Program, new legislation sponsored by
Assemblywoman Eastin calls for a revamping of the State Program. Among the points
contained in the proposed bill is elimination of the incentive for multi-track in calculating
district eligibility for State funds. Should this legislation be successful, the District's
eligibility would increase. This and other indicators in Sacramento lead to a perceived """""
reduction in State involvement in school construction.
Comment 3:
"Suggest that the District re-evaluate Its polley on the ownership of
relocatable classrooms which are then considered part of the
school's permanent capacity In the State's assessment of
overcrowding. Leasing the relocatables would put the District In a
better position of receiving State funding."
The District's decision to purchase rather than lease its ninety-five (95) relocatable
classrooms was made years ago. Given the facts that annual lease costs are
estimated at $10,000 - $15,000, and that the demand for the additional buildings has
continued and increased over the years, this decision has proven sound. Site
preparation and improvement costs for adding relocatables are the same whether the
building is owned or leasad.
In addition, effective January 1, 1994, relocatable classrooms that were owned by a
district for at least twenty (20) years no longer count in the State's eligibility
calculations. Therefore, when District eligibility is re-calculated, it should increase by
2,010, the number of children housed in the sixty-seven 20+ year old relocatable -..
buildings usad as classrooms.
E-Z
GMQC-93
Page 3
.. Comment 4:
"Support the District In Its efforts to change State law to lower the
required vote on general obligation bonds from two-thirds to a
simple majority."
Proposition 170, the bill that would have reduced the required vote to a simple majority,
failed by a majority of over two-thirds in November, 1993. Similar legislation has been
proposed this year which is strongly supported by the school community as a whole.
Comment 5:
.
"Prior to the approval of any application to rezone property In
western Chula Vista which would Increase the allowable density or
Intensity of use, fully analyze Impacts to elementary schools and
apply appropriate mitigation to ensure that no aggravation of
existing threshold conditions would result from such action.
Furthermore, the City should seek achievement of full mitigation In
the long-term for school Impacts from Inflll development In western
Chula Vista regardless of whether rezonlngs or other legislative acts
are Involved."
To date, the District has not been successful in obtaining full mitigation even for all
projects requiring legislative acts. Currently, there is a proposal for a large shopping
center containing a Wal-Mart near the Chula VistalNational City border. Since all area
schools are operating .at or above cepacity, the District has requested full mitigation.
Hopefully the City will assist the District in achieving this goal by following the
recommendations contained in their Statements of Concem issued to the District for the
past three years.
Comment 6:
"Continue to support and encourage cooperative efforts between the
City, the Elementary School District, High School District and
SourcePolnt to conduct a study of the Impacts of new residential and
non-resldentlal development, and other factors upon enrollment In
City schools. The study Is Intended to serve as a basis from which
to develop mitigation strategies."
.
The study is progressing and is anticipated to result in data which ~II be extremely
benefICial to both school districts end the City in projecting school facility needs based
on projected development. It is anticipated that once impacts from both residential and
non-residential development are quantified, potential methods for fully mitigating these
impacts will be analyzed and a proposal prepared for Council/School Board
consideration.
E-3
GMOC-93
Page 4
Comment 7:
"""'"
"Through conditions of approval, require full mitigation of school
Impacts from both residential and non-restdential development In the
Bayfront project, and reinforce this condition by requiring that any
Disposition and Development Agreement for the project ensure full
mitigation of all school Impacts. Furthermore, recommend to the
District that this mitigation be Implemented by expanding existing
schools In the northwest quadrant of the City."
The District is most appreciative of the City's assistance in assuring that full mitigation
for this project will be provided. It is anticipated that any funds will be utilized to
expand existing sites in the most over-crowded western areas, most likely Feaster
School, to accommodate children from the Bayfront project.
RESPONSE TO CITY'S 12 - 18 MONTH FORECAST
Proiects Within Sweetwater Authoritv Service Area
'Enrollments in western Chula Vista continue to increase. Of the 1770 dwelling units
expected to reach occupancy over the next 12 - 18 months, 82 are located in the
Sweetwater Authority service area. At the average District-wide student generation
rate of 0.3 studentsfunit, 25 new students are anticipated from residential development. """'"
Table 1 indicates the number of units and the home schools for these students.
TABLE 1
School No. Units New Students
Rosebank 11 3
Feaster 12 4
OtayfMontgomery 6 2
Misc. Other 53 16
TOTAL 82 25
While most schools west of 1-805 are operating at or above capacity, some space does
exist in certain schools at various grade levels. As of January 6, 1994, 302 children
were being overflow bused from all District schools, of which 192 are from schools west
of 1-805.
In order to maximize classroom facilities usage as school populations increase, in
addition to busing to schools with capacity, any remaining non-essential uses being
conducted in regular classrooms will have to be discontinued or, if feasible, moved to """'"
smaller areas. Examples of these changes include dismantling computer labs,
E-tt
'.
.
.
GMOC-93
PageS
relocating resource teachers into smaller rooms, etc. Most schools have already taken
these steps. As stated above, 24 schools developed growth plans over the past three
years, and all plans are reviewed annually. Consideration is given to multi-track or
other possibilities which could increase facility capacity. These changes, combined
with reconfiguration of classes (i.e., combination classes, pairing schools, etc.), absent
significant internal neighborhood growth, should enable the District to accommodate
growth anticipated from new residential development in this area next year.
For the past two years, the District's report to the GMOC discussed contributors to
increases in student enrollment which included non-residential development, Central
Chula Vista rezoning, and redevelopment. These factors, along with changing and
recycling neighborhoods and demographic trends, continue to be major contributors to
overcrowding in western area schools.
The City's development report contains a listing of commercial, industrial and office
construction which totals 3,665,244 square feet, slightly higher than what was reported
last year. Utilizing SANDAG's 1990 report, "School District Development Impact Fees:
Relationship Between New Non-Residential Development and Student Enrollment"
approximately 1500 new students are projected from this non-residential development.
It is not possible to predict what schools these new children will attend. While District
and City staffs are refining this formula to prevent any double counting, clearly job
growth and the creation of new non-residential space have major impacts on student
enrollment. The District has actively sought and will continue to seek full mitigation for
impacts these activities have on school facilities.
Proiects Within the Otav Water District Service Area
The District has five Mello-Roos Community Facilities Districts (CFD's) in place, four of
which are project-spacific and in Chula Vista's Eastern Territories, the area served by
the Otay Water District. The fifth is a generic district and includes projects throughout
the District, As new large projects are proposed, new CFD's will be formed to finance
site acquisition and needed elementary facilities. It is anticipated that new CFD's will
be formed for the following areas: (1) Salt Creek Ranch; (2) OIay Ranch; (3) Rancho
San Miguel; and, (4) Otay Mesa (City of San Diego). Miscellaneous smaller projects
will also be annexed into CFD NO.5. .
City projections for this area over the next 12 - 18 months indicate a total of 1688 new
units. At the District's average student generation rate of 0.3 students/dwelling unit,
506 new students can be expected during the forecast period. Sixty-eight percent of
these units are in the EastLake or Rancho del Rey Planned Communities, both of
which are within CFD's. EastLake School serves residents of. the EastLake
Community, with a new school to be located in EastLake Greens tentatively scheduled
to open on a single-track year-round schedule in July, 1995. Discovery School, the
District's newest facility, opened on a single-track year-round schedule in July, 1993, to
serve students generated from the Rancho del Rey Community. It is anticipated that
E-5
GMOC-93
Page 6
this school will go on a year-round multi-track schedule when warranted by enrollment
counts. Plans and financing are in place to provide facilities to serve the 346 children
projected from these two communities over the next 12 -18 months. Table 2 indicates
a portion of the remaining 536 units, the number of children anticipated, and the
schools they will attend.
-....
TABLE 2
~chool No. Units New Students
Tiffany 19 6
Clear View 130 39
Chula Vista Hills 54 16
Misc. Other 07 02
TOTAL 210 63
Of the remaining 326 units, 98 children are projected, 53 from Salt Creek Ranch, and
45 from Telegraph Canyon. In the case of Salt Creek Ranch, formation of a new CFD
to serve this project, Telegraph Canyon, and Baldwin's Salt Creek One project (land
purchased from EastLake Development Company and within CFD No.1) was before
the School Board in December, 1992. Formation proceedings were formally
abandoned in July, 1993, at the developer's request and have not been re-initiated.
Telegraph Canyon proceeded separately as discussed below, and Salt Creek One is
mitigating its impacts via participation in CFD NO.1.
"""""
,
Since Salt Creek Ranch is in a newly developing area, there are no existing schools to
serve this project. EastLake School, the nearest facility, is at capacity and projected to
remain so. Until this project's impacts on schools are mitigated, it is unknown how or
where children from this project will be housed. In the event space is available at
various schools throughout the District, children will be bused to whatever schools have
space at a particular grade level. This is highly undesirable as, among other things, it
splits families, neighborhoods, and creates substantial busing time for students as well
as additional costs. In the event all District schools reach capacity during this forecast
period, there will be no room for the children from Salt Creek Ranch.
It takes some time to form a new CFD and to generate adequate revenue to finance
construction of a new school. The City imposed a condition of approval on Salt Creek
Ranch that all impacts on school facilities be fully mitigated. If this mitigation is to be in
the form of a CFD, it is essential that formation occur well in advance of construction to
assure facilities will be available when children begin to arrive.
In the case of Telegraph Canyon, it was considered part of the Olay Ranch, and since
Olay Ranch will be providing new schools to house its students, no provisions were -...
made for housing these children elsewhere. Until a new school is built on Otay Ranch,
E-(P
.
.
.
GMOC-93
Page 7
children will be housed temporarily wherever space IS available. As discussed above,
initially, in 1992, this project was included with Salt Creek Ranch in formation
proceedings for a new CFD. However, when the proceedings were abandoned, this
project was annexed to CFD No.5. Funds generated from this CFD may be utilized to
place temporary classrooms on an existing school, or, if a particular school has
adequate capacity, children could be housed at that site.
RESPONSE TO CITY's 5 - 7 YEAR FORECAST
The City's projections indicate a long-term growth rate ranging from 1,059 - 1,485
dwelling units/year over the forecast period. Approximately 5 - 10 percent of this total
will develop within the Sweetwater Authority service area. Given the overcrowded
conditions in most area schools, we can expect overcrowding to continue and worsen.
It is hoped that the joint study between the school districts and the City will result in a
mechanism to provide full mitigation for impacts of this growth.
The remaining 90 - 95 percent of the projected units will be in the Otay service area
and it is anticipated that full mitigation for school impacts will be obtained through
participation in Mello-Roos Community Facilities Districts or other alternative full
reimbursement funding mechanisms. The City has fully' supported the District in
obtaining this mitigation.
DISTRICT ACTIVITIES
In past reports, the District reported various activities undertaken to plan proactively for
growth and improve school facilities. Among these were: (1) the annual Development
Activity Report which tracks proposed and approved projects within individual school
attendance areas and estimates development phasing and numbers of new students;
(2) school growth planning studies; (3) boundary/attendance area adjustments; (4)
residency verification; (5) requests for City assistance; (6) District responses to notices
of proposed development; (7) participation in the State Building Program
(modernization); and (8) utilization of CDBG funding for playground improvements. All
these activities continue to be utilized on an ongoing basis.
The District also continues to pursue participation in CFD 5 with smaller non-
contiguous projects. Unless the project requires a legislative act on the part of the City,
this participation is voluntary. All project proponents are notified of this option in lieu of
payment of developer fees. Funds collected from CFD No. 5 will be used throughout
the District to assist in housing children generated from these projects.
E-]
GMOC-93
Page 8
In addition to the activities discussed above, this year the District participated in the
following: """'\
1. State Building Program (modernization)
The District received Phase II approval and funding for modernizing eleven
schools that are over 30 years old. The schools are: Allen, Castle Park,
Feaster, Harborside, Montgomery, Rice, Vista Square, Sunnyside,
Rosebank, Hilltop and Kellogg. Funding under this program is based on
two criteria: age of the facility, and district-wide average daily attendance
eligibility. . Several additional schools meet the age requirement, and as
District-wide eligibility is attained, applicetions will be submitted for
modernizing these facilities. The modernization program is intended to
upgrade nonstructural elements of .a building to conform to present usage
and codes. These upgrades include heating, air conditioning and plumbing
systems, cabinetry, electrical (including cabling and hardware for
educational technology), fire alarms, and bringing the facilities up to
handicapped accessibility standards. Increasing the facility's capacity to
house additional students and general repair and maintenance items are
not permitted.
Phase II consists of preparation and submittal of construction plans and
documents to the State and approval from the Department of State
Architect (DSA). The District anticipates receiving DSA approval in April,
1994. Our eleven applications will then be placed on a State Allocation
Board agenda for Phase III approval and funding. Phase III is the actual
construction phase. Since the State is out of money, funding for Phase III
will have to come from a school bond which will hopefully be in June, 1994.
........
,
2. CDBG Funding
In 1992, the District received $50,000 in Community Development Block
Grant (CDBG) funds from the City for playground improvements at three
schools: Rice, Montgomery and lauderbach. Concrete ballwalls were
constructed at these three schools and are in constant use by students and
members of the community during off-school hours.
This past year the District received $60,000 in CDBG funds for
improvements at five additional schools: Feaster, Vista Square, Mueller,
Olay and Harborside. Since the City is currently working on an Otay
Neighborhood Park Plan which would include Otay School's playground, it
was determined to delete Otay from the application. Based on the success
of the ballwalls, and the funding limitations, ballwalls will be constructed at
all four schools. It is anticipated that this work will be completed during the
summer.
........
E-6'
'.
.
.
GMOC-93
Page 9
These improvements are intended to enhance and expand recreational
opportunities for both students and the community. The City wishes to
provide and enhance recreational opportunities in Western Chula Vista;
however, the lack of appropriate sites makes this difficult. Utilizing school
playgrounds during off-school hours is beneficial to all.
3.
The District's Technology Plan is underway, Over the next two years, all
District facilities will be wired and networked to permit access to
educational technology and facilitate administrative functions.
CITY ACTIVITIES
District and City staffs are continuing to work on a joint study with Sweetwater Union
High School staff. The study is being performed by SourcePoint (SANDAG) and will
identify and quantify impacts of both residential and non-residential development on
school facilities. Upon completion of this study, and based on the findings, it is
anticipated that the City Council and Board of Education will jointly consider an
equitable method for providing full mitigation of development's impacts on schools.
mswc'omoc.93b
-.
E-q
Sweetwater Union High School District
ADMINISTRATION CENTER
1130 Al1h AVlnul
Chula Vlala, California 81911-2896
(819) 891-5500
Dlvlllon of Planning and Facllltlel
March 8. 1994
Mr. Ed Batchelder
Associate Planner
City of Chula Vista
Planning Department
276 Fourth Avenue
Chula Vista, CA 91910
Dear Ed:
RE: 1994 GMOC Report
.
Please accept the enclosed report to the Growth Management Oversight Commission as
the District's response to the 12 - 18 month and the 5-7 year forecasts provided in your
February 4. 1994 letter to me. As in past reports. this report is outlined as follows:
Part I: Address the growth forecasts provided by staff as follows:
1. Amount of capacity now used or committed.
2. Ability to absorb forecast growth in affected areas.
3. Evaluation of funding and site availability for projected new facilities.
4. Other relevant information:
A. Status of Eastlake High School Construction
B. Proposed Junior High/Middle School in Rancho del Rey.
C. Proposed change to the State School Lease/PurChase Program
Part II. Address the prior statement of concern adopted by the city council.
As we discussed. 1 will be available on March 17, 1994. to meet with the GMOC. If you
have any questions. please feel free to call me at 691-5553.
.
S~.
~/,r~$
Thomas Silva
Assistant Director of Planning
enclosure
E-IO
~at....r IJnlno Hiob ~1 Didrid:
Part I: Current StaniS of District Facilities:
1. Amount of Capacily now used or committed.
1
This year's CBEDS showed that the District's enrollment is at 28,818 students, an increase of 70
students from last year's enrollment ( 28,748 students). CBEDS establishes a benchmaIIc. enrollment
and is used by the State Department of Education for detellllining, among other lhings, average daily
atIendance and capacity analysis. The att~(:hed CBEDS chart identifies the District's enrollment by
school. As can be seen. the District is still operating at or above capacity levels. The following
summarizes the CUITeIlt status of the schools 10cated within (hula Vista:
Percent JuniorlMiddle Percent
DiPh Srhnnl ("~J)acltv ~nnl f'~naci.v
Bonita Vista High 115% Bonita Vista Middle 97%
Castle Park High 117% Castle Park Middle 87%
Chula Vista High 113% (hula Vista Junior 100%
Eastlake High N/A Hilltop Junior High 74%
Hilltop High 115%
Four of the five high schools serving the Qty of (hula Vista are between 113% to 115% total
capacity while the junior high/middle schools are between 74% to 100%. Eastlake High School is in
the final phases of construction; approximately 1,100 students attend school there. Upon
completion, the school will be able to accommodate 2,400 students. This will help reduce the
pressure at the high schools.
2. Abilily to absorb forecast growth in affected areas.
2A. 12-18 Month Forecast
.........
To best understand the impact new development will have OIl district facilities, each of the
development projects identified in the 12 - 18 month forecast were grouped into their respective high
school and junior high / middle school attendance areas. Then each projected unit count was
converted from number of units forecasted to number of students generated. A factor of .10 students
per unit was used to for middle school and a factor of .19 was used for high school. The following
summarizes the student distribution by school:
~hnnl
Bonita Vista High
Eastlake High
Hilltop High
Castle Park High
(hula Vista High
12 Month Forecast
IiIual Fioaled
97 80
123 105
o 2
o I
I 12
Bonita Vista Middle
Hilltop Middle
Castle Park Middle
(hula Vista Junior
116
o
o
I
107
I
1
6
Total
338
315
18 Month Forecast
Iaaal Finaled
134 141
183 180
o 2
3 I
2 12
167
o
I
I
170
I
I
6
~
491
514
Sweetwater UDion Higb School District
PIIge 1
1994 GMOC Report
[=:-11
'.
Not swprisingly, the ~ area of impact will occur in the easte11l tenitories. The major
contributors are the Eastlake Greens and the Rancho Del Rey Spa I projects. It is anticipated that
P"oIl..ke High School will absorb most oftbese new students. The overcrowding at neighboring high
schools should decrease after Eastl..k., is completed and atleMAl\Ce boundaries are readjusted.
Cwrent1y, Eastlake High School is still WIder constroction. It is approximately 95% complete.
Because the school is on a year round schedule, students are moved into classrooms as they become
available for use. The first increment of CODSlJUction made 44 teaching stations available for use,
and, lI1us far, Increment n of CODSlJUction has made 18 lIdditional classrooms available. 20
additional classrooms are in their final stages of completion and will be ready for student use soon.
2B. 5-7 Year Forecast
Similar to the 12 - 18 monlh forecast, the 5 - 7 year developmeot projections were converted from
total mnnber of dwellings to total mnnber of students. The same student yidd factors were used for
middle school and high school The Oty is projecting an average growth rate ranging from 1,059 to
1,485 dwelling units per year over the 7 year time frame. 1bis equates to approximately 307 to 431
students per year. The following table specifically identifies the projected student generation by
year:
Annual Growth Middle School High School
l:aI: O1ula Vida (1.8\ (9. 12) J:sWIl
bIIIi1sl (midRIb) lalldMt[l;)
1993 654 65 123 188
,
. 1994 806 81 153 234
1995 1477 148 281 429
1996 1840 184 350 534
1997 1947 195 370 565
1998 1853 185 352 537
1999 1631 163 310 473
2000 1678 168 319 487
Awrage 1483 149 282 431
Because the projected development is based on the Oty's capture rate of a regional growth forecast,
it is difficult to predict a specific distribution of the anticipated growth. It is reasonable to assume,
however, that most of it will occur in the eastern tenitories. If this is the case, then Eastlake High
School and the future middle school in the Rancho del Rey community can receive many of the new
students. Prior to the current recession, the District was averaging approximatdy 450 to 500 new
students annually. ('Ibis included development from O1ula Vista as wen as San Diego, National
Oty, the county and Imperial Beach).
3. Evaluation offunding and site availability for projected new facilities.
.
The District partIcipates in the State School BuIIdlng Lease-Pwcbase Program. Half of the funds
used to construct ~~aJce High School comes from local resoun:es, specifically bond proceeds paid
from the community facilities districts established in the eastern tenitories, and the other half of the
construction cost is borne by the state through the state aid program. The District will apply the
same funding approach to the new junior high I middle school1ocated in the Rancho del Rey SPA ill
planning area and the new high school identified in the Otay Mesa Community Plan. Unfimded
Phase I approval for these two projects has already been given by the State Allocation Board. This
actioo ensures the District's funding priority when dollars become available.
Sweetwater UDioa Higb School District ....e 2 1994 GMOC Report
(:-12-
The site for the junior m&1 / middle school has already been identined in the Rancho Del Rey
commlmity. However. the District has yet to acquire the property. A negotiated cost has been
est9b1isbed. and land acquisition should occur after the site is rough graded. The site for the high
school is located in the Santee Investments Precise Planning Area. More specifically. it is located
near the southeast corner of the Dillon Trail and future interstate-90S intersection.
~
4. Other relevant information:
A. Status qf Eastlake High School ConstrUCtion.
As already identified, Eastlake High School is approximately 95% complete. Although the
contractual completion date is in the latter part of the year. the conttactor anticipates
completion lhis summer. The roofing and all exterior building wolk is complete and the
conttactor is now concentrating on the interiors, the landscaping and the hardscape.
B. Proposed Junior High/Middle School in Rancho del Rey.
A new junior high/middle school is proposed for the Rancho del Rey planned commlmity. It
will be located at the southeast corner of the future East J Street / Paseo Ranchero
intersection. Additionally. a community paIk will be adjacent to the school. The District
and the Oty have already agreed to a concept master plan for the paIk. The progress made
on lhis project. the initiation of state funding. the establishment of local financing, the
identification of the site and the cooperation with the Oty, specifically PaIks and
Recreation, and the developer (McMillan Development) has been very encouraging.
The District has already begun the architect selection process for lhis project. A finn should
be selected in the Spring of lhis year. The programming for the school should begin during .........
the 1994/1995 school year, and the target date for its opening is 1997.
C. Proposed change to the State Aide Program
Currently. the state aide program is comprised of three phases. Phase I deals directly with
project application and the District's eligibility to participate. Phase II deals with site
acquisition and the funding of architectural and engineering costs. Phase III addresses the
actual construction of the school. This process is quite lengthy and often takes years to
complete.
New legislation has been introduced by assembly member Eastin which proposes to simplify
the state program. The bill, previously identified as AD I2S0 and yet to be renumbered,
proposes to colIapse the present three phase system into two phases. State regulation and
oversight will be drastically cut back and greater control at the district level will be granted.
Additional elements of the bill call for the e1iminatiori of the year round education
requirement, the 30% relocatabIe requirement, and the state imposed lien of other district
schools during the district's participation in the program. The District is supportive of the
bill and has provided its legislators with written acknowledgment of lhis support. The
District requests that the GMOC urge the Oty CoIDlCil to review the bill and. if it is
favorable, offer the Oty's written support of the legislation.
~.
Sweetwater Union High School District
Page 3
t: -12.,
1994 GMOC Report
..
.
.
Part ll: lQ93 ~tatP.mP.nt 0.. ~m:
This part of the report addresses the issues identified in the 1992 GMOC report to the City Council.
1. Urge the District to continue to actively explore means to alleviate school overcrowding
through innovative scheduling methods and techniques.
The concept of principal based management is used by the District. Principals are cbarged with
the responsibility of the master scbedule and room utilization. Each spring. the planning
department provides them with the estimated enrollment projections which are used to facilitate
the development of the master schedule. Additionally. boundary adjustments have successfully
been used to redistribute students and reduce the rnrollment pressures at specific schools.
2. Support the School District in its efforts to change State law to lower the required vote on
general obligation bonds from two-thirds to a simple majority, and encourage voting support
for the June 1994 State ballot measure.
Proposition 170. a measure on the November 1993. state ballot which included language to
reduce the two-thirds vote requirement. did not receive sufficient support for passage. This is
still a concern to the District. and City support on the education community's efforts to lower the
approval limit will be appreciated. Staff has learned that only ooe piece of legislation is
proposed to address this issue. It is SeA 36. and its scope is limited to the reconstruction of
buildings which are not structurally sound.
3. Deny applications to rezone any property in Western Chula Vista which would increase
allowable density or intensity of use unless no aggravation of existing threshold standards
related to schools will result because of full, adequate and equitable mitigation. Achievement
of full mitigation in the long-term for ir(ill development in western Chula Vista should be
sought, regardless of whether rezonings or other legislative acts are involved.
The District has consistently requested the full mitigation of residential projects which fall under
the classification of ''legislative actions". and the city has consistent1y complied with the
District's requests where appropriate.
With regard to commercial! industrial development, the District. the City and the Chula Vista
Elementary School District have jointly contracted with SourcePoint to explore the feasibility
and appropriateness of full mitigation for nonresident development Particular consideration is
given to the issue of potential "double payment" by projects located in community facillty
districts. That study is about one-third complete. and it is too early to speculate on the results.
This issue is still of concern to the District and support by the city is appreciated.
4. Continue to support and encourage the District's participation in cooperative efforts between
City staff, the Chula Vista Eiementary School District and SourcePoint to study the impacts of
new non-residential development upon City schools. Based upon the study, consider adoption
of measures which would fully mitigate such impacts.
As identified in the response for item 3. the District is participating in the study.
Sweetwater Union HIah SeIIooI District Page 4
E"-/3
1994 GMOC Report
S. Through firm COnditlv..s of approval early in the process, reqUl. e full mitigation of school
impacts from both residential and non residential development in the Bayfront project, and
recommend to the school district that this mitigation measure be implemented by expanding
existing schools in western Chula Vista. Reinforce this condition by requiring that any
Disposition and Development Agreement for the project ensure full mitigation of all school
impacts.
-..,
Although a mitigation strategy has Ileal developed and Identified in the environmental analysis
prepared for the Bayfront project. it has yet 10 be impl.....ented. This is still a concern of the
District
6. Support the Sweetwater District Board's efforts to end the moratorium on residential
development on Oray Mesa in the City of San Diego, in order that the District could construct
new schools in the area which would relieve overcrowding pressures on Chula Vista schools.
In the fall of 1993, the San Diego City ColDlCil lifted the moratorium on development on the
Olay Mesa. The District particularly appreciates the assistance Mr. George Krempl and the
City Manager's office provided. This issue has been satisfied.
The District has tentatively targeted September 1999. as the opening date for the future high
school. Programming, architecture and engineering and site acquisition have yet to be done. but
they are in the District's future plans.
7. The City Library and the Sweetwater District support creating a program which would provide
work experience for high school students within the proposed joint library facility to be
located at Eastlake High School. As a joint use agreement has been forwarded to the City
Attorney, it is urged that the City expedite action on the agreement, as the library must
become a reality before the mentioned work study program can be created.
""""'
The joint use agreement is in place. and the community has access to the library during non-
school hours. With regard to a wolk study program. the City does hire students as shelvers; two
positions have been funded for this school year. Eastlake high school students, as wen as
students from other schools. are eligible to compete for the positions.
~
Sweetwater UDioa High School District
PageS
~-It.f
1994 GMOC Report
Ex lit I: CBEDS Chart
SWEElW A TER UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISlRICf
1993/1994 CBEDS ENROLLMENT
ocr. 13.1993 (llI!r1'~1'K\-1)
CAPACITY
L TRLR.+ . + PERMENANT = TOTAL
HIGH SCHOOLS
BVH..... 120 1812 1932 2230
CPH..... 240 1568 1808 2122
CVH..... 480 1356 1836 2080
ELH/ 840 1288 2128 1110
HHS.... 120 1388 1508 1739
MVH 240 1300 1540 1867
MoHI 480 1270 1750 1806
SoHI 840 1214 2054 2159
SuHi ()() 1958 225 22 2
SUBTOTAL 0 3660 13154 16814 17315
JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOLS
BVJ/ 210 1284 1494 1453
CPM/ 1456 1456 1270
CVJHS .- 360 1070 1430 1426
GIS" 1096 1096 949
HJS/ 120 1386 1506 1112
MVM 1246 1246 1249
MOJR 1674 1674 1445
NCM 60 922 982 777
SOWJR 360 828 1188 1350
SUBTOTAL 360 750 10962 12072 11031
PALOMAR HIGH
SAC'"
472
120
120
SUBTOTAL
120
o
120
472
TOTAL
360
4530
24116
29006
28818
... The 93/94 CBEDS count included SAC students in their home schools.
E-15
UJ
Q)
--
~
a1
-c
c:
::J
o
al
~
en
; reS h 01 I I
,..,1111 . I .
nu;;! i I nil _ ~
ii i; Hi 1 ; i Iii I i I ~~ ~
I t if 'I'
II II! tll !" ~
II I I'!I'
EEJ]J i @O: J ~
I
I~II
UII
11111:11
uu *
MI
I
..
..
..
..
..
.,
.-
:is
:2
.
III
~
~u
!
Ej
g~
u]
a~
.
"
: '....~ ,:-
\;(=~)'. ' ,
\ ~\ -. I ,.
\ '\::
\ - : \ ," .
\; .-'
,-
'"
E -/0
.xhibit III: Location of High S J01
-sl
!~
OJ'" =
"':ell: OIl i
~~~ OIl '"'
. = '"'
~Z;l: I- cs
..
5!. a ~
ai-- is E i:!
-,~e .. li if
.......... g
II~ Q ...
... .. ... .J
i
;:,. ,
..;. .
-
~
-'
C
t-
III
~
ell
..
I-
III
Z
-
loll
~
L~
..J .....
i i ~
- ~
s ~ ~
... ! a::
.. ~
....a
z~
.
:::0
=8
S::a
~~
.-
=a
=p.c
Et
!Z ~ EO
.., -' to- ...J ~ ..
2!;i!;i~ -
. lit.... - III _ Co> 161 -. ~
1&.1 Z ~ - u cc ,....,.
a: ~ is l:l ....d;!
~j;;2a: Ie = !'!
;;;!::l~ i5su en ~
z c:::- Co> ~ CI.> ~
~~!~ ;t~~ Ill!!! ;
,.::-~ --- -= ~
~Zell "'''0 II
rc::~ ;~i ::--.~
...0.... I...... ra..
>..J....:c Uut21: '"
tErn III d I
II
..
':2
t:-17
.
.
.
DATE:
January 10, 1994
TO: Growth Management OVersight Committee
FROM: David J. Palmer, Library Director ~
SUBJECT: Annual Threshold Compliance Review
SOIIMARY:
PRESENT SOUARE FOOTAGE
Chula Vista Public Library
365 F Street
55,000 sq. ft.
10,000 sq. ft.
1,720 sq. ft.
609 sq. ft.
67,329 sq. ft.
EastLake Library
1120 EastLake Parkway
Castle Park/otay Library
1592 3rd Avenue
Woodlawn Park Library
115 Spruce Road
TOTAL
POPULATION OF CHULA VISTA
June 1, 1993
147,293
THRESHOLD STANDARD
Population Ratio: 500 square feet (gross) of library
facility adequately equipped and staffed per 1,000
population
THRESHOLD SOUARE FOOTAGE NEEDED AT 500 SQUARE FEET PER 1.000
147,293 POPulation x .500
73,647 sq. ft.
CURRENT THRESHOLD SQUARE POOTAGE SHORTAGE
1993
6,318 sq. ft.
F- /
DISCUSSION:
........,
In 1993 the city, EastLake Development Company and the Sweetwater
Union High School District reached agreement to establish public
library service, for a three year trial basis, at the IastLake High
School campus library. This was one .ore step in implementing the
Librarv Master Plan of 1987, which calls for new libraries in the
Eastern Territories, the Jlontgomery /otay , and SWeetwater /BOnita
Planning Areas. This unique arrangement allowed the City to begin
public library service in eastern Chula Vista, in August 1993, mlch
sooner than previously planned. The new library is now open to the
general public after 3:30 PM on weekdays and all day Saturday.
Approximately 10,000 square feet of the campus Library/Media Center
Building is designated as public library space and is included in
the Library Threshold calculations. At the conclusion of the trial
period, a decision will be _de whether or not to continue service
at the school or establish service at another location.
In December 1993 construction began on a 37,000 square foot
cOlBlDUnity library, located at the southeast corner of 4th and
Orange Avenues, in the Montgomery /otay Planning Area. This project
also implements a component of the Librarv Master Plan and is
partially funded by a $6,747,528 Library Renovation and
Construction Bond Act grant administered by the California State
Library. This award provides 65\ of the construction and other
eligible costs only. The remaining $8,697,000 needed for the .-..
project is funded primarily by community Development Block Grant
funds and Library Development Impact Fees. When completed in
December 1994, the Library will provide complete information and
reader's services to adults, young adults and children. The
facility will have room for 178,000 books and audio visual
materials and will include a public access computer lab, meeting
rooms, a coffee bar/boOkstore, and exhibition/gallery space. In
addition, the library will also become the new home of the Chula
Vista Literacy Team.
The Library has previously been allocated $200,000 in the Capital
Improvement Program for architectural services for a 29,000 square
foot library to be built at the corner of H Street and paseo
Ranchero in the Sweetwater /BOni ta Planning Area. Because the
project will be funded by Library Developaent Iapact Pees, the
project bas been delayed until adequate fees are collected to cover
the estimated $9.5 million needed to construct, furnish and equip
the facility.
~
/:- 2-
. COlICLUSIOIf:
The city is currently 6,318 square feet short of aeeting the
Library Threshold Standard. However, the opening of the 37,000
square foot Library at 4th and orange Avenues, in December 1994,
will bring the City into coapliance with the Library Threshold on
a cumulative basis:
TOTAL :
67,329 sq. ft.
37,000 sq. ft
(1.720) sq. ft
102,609 sq. ft.
1993 Library Square Footage
1994 Library at 4th & Orange Opens
1994 Castle park/Otay Library closes
1994 Library Threshold Square Footage
Requirement (based on estiaated
population of 147,542)
1994 Library Threshold Square Footage
OVerage
73,771 sq. ft.
28,838 sq. ft.
Therefore, even when considering a projected city population of
175,766 in the year 2000, the City will still exceed the threshold
requirement by approximately 14,726 square feet on a cumulative
basis.
.
.
~-3
.
.
.
MEMORANDUM
January 11, 1994
File # KY -043
KY-057
TO:
Bob Leiter, Director of Planning.
Cliff Swanson, Deputy Public Works Director/City Engin~
Chula Vista Compliance with the Threshold Standards ~90 Sewer and
Drainage
FROM:
SUBJECT:
In accordance with the proVISIOns of the City's Growth Management Program, we are
providing the following report regarding sewer and drainage threshold standards.
Sewer
No significant instances of established thresholds for sanitary sewers being exceeded as a result
of new growth in the City occurred during 1993. City design standards for sewers limit the
flow in sewers up to 12" in diameter to 50"10 full and to 75% full for sewers larger than 12".
The City has also allowed flow up to 75% full in 8", 10" and 12" diameter sewers if it has
been shown that ultimate development has already occurred.
Willdan Associates completed the Telegraph Canyon Sewer Basin Improvement and Financing
Plan in 1992. This plan estimated existing and ultimate sewage flows, recommended necessary
sewerage system improvements, and determined fees to create funding for these improvements.
The City Council approved the plan in October, 1992 and established a Sewer Development
Impact Fee of $560 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit for new construction in the Telegraph
Canyon Sewer Basin. This fee will pay the proportionate share of the cost of upgrading the
sewer system to handle the sewage generated by new developments and flowing into the
Telegraph Canton sewer basin. An amended plan incorporating pumped flows from EastLake
and Salt Creek Ranch Developments not within the basin and additional projected flows from
the Kaiser Hospital and Medical Center was completed in June, 1993. City Council approval
of the amended plan and establishment of a fee for pumped flows from out of basin
developments is projected to occur in spring, 1994.
The Proctor Valley Road Sewer was constructed in 1992 to serve the Salt Creek I, Salt Creek
Ranch, Rancho San Miguel, and Bonita Meadows developments, as well as other adjacent
parcels. This line is connected to the County's Frisbie Trunk Sewer, for which a Trunk Sewer
Usage Agreement is currently being prepared.
A sewer analysis has been performed by Wilson Engineering for the Salt Creek Sewer Basin.
The planned Salt Creek interceptor will serve Salt Creek Ranch, Eastlake, Hidden Valley
Estates (in unincorporated territory east of Mt. Miguel) and Otay Ranch developments.
Recommended improvements and a financing plan are expected to be presented to the City
G-/
Council for approval by mid-1994.
--.,
The construction of a parallel sewer along Industrial Boulevard has been completed. This work
will alleviate the impact expected to be caused by the Palomar Trolley Center and relieves
existing capacity problems in this section. Ongoing monitoring of segments located
downstream of this project will indicate when the need for a parallel sewer south of Main
Street has developed.
The City is using several methods to identify and determine the cause of peak flows exceeding
City standards in existing sewers:
1. Several problem sites have been identified as a result of our flow monitoring program.
One parallel sewer was constructed in 1993 (Industrial Boulevard), and another one is
scheduled for 1994 (palm Canyon). The Engineering Division proposes to acquire
additional portable monitoring equipment during FY 1995 to improve metering accuracy
and expand the metering program.
2.
The City's sewer TV inspection crew continues to monitor suspected problem sites in
order to determine if the condition of the sewer lines has affected the flow. Phase IV
of the sewer rehabilitation program which provided for the rehabilitation of 1537 lineal
feet and replacement of 341 lineal feet of sewer mains was completed in 1993. An
additional 41,793 linear feet of sewer lines were televised during 1993 for Phase V of
the Sewer Rehabilitation Program. Rehabilitation projects providing for 1851 lineal feet
and replacement of 240 lineal feet of sewer mains in Phase V are included in the CIP
for FY 93-94. The construction contract for Phase V is expected to go to bid in 1994.
Also, preparation of Phase VI has begun and is included in the CIP for FY 94-95.
Television inspection of the sewer lines will continue in 1994.
~
3. The August 1990 Wastewater Master Plan prepared by Engineering-Science includes
an analysis of current and projected future flows for all City trunk lines and provides
recommendations for construction of new and upgraded sewers and preliminary cost
estimates. As indicated above, the City's monitoring and TV inspection programs are
used to keep the Master Plan information current.
4. Environmental documents prepared for proposed new developments must address the
adequacy of existing sewers to serve their needs. Remedial actions will be required
where necessary to accommodate flows added by the developments.
Sites identified through these methods may be considered for inclusion in the Capital
Improvement Program or the Sewer Rehabilitation Program. New developments are required
to pay a proportionate share of the estimated cost of building new sewers needed to serve their
projects.
San DiellO Metrooolitsn Sewer Authoritv
.-..
The Average Daily Flow (ADF) of wastewater into the Metro Sewage System during the first
half of FY 1993-94 was approximately 11.356 million gallons per day (mgd). This included
6-2.
.
.
.
-3-
January 11, 1994
9.127 mgd of metered flows discharged directly to the Metro sewer line and 2.229 mgd of
metered and non-metered flows discharged through the Spring Valley Sewer outfall.
Seven new permanent wastewater metering stations which measure flows to the Spring Valley
Outfall Sewer are in operation. A new metering station is also in operation on "F" Street West
of Bay Boulevard.
The City's existing sewage capacity reservation (including Montgomery) with Metro is 19.2
mgd. The Engineering Science Master Plan contained a curve of projected wastewater flows
based on historic data. According to this curve, the City would reach the 19.2 MGD by the
year 2000. However, the Average Daily Flow obtained in the last three years has not followed
this curve. The flows have decreased as a result of water conservation measures and a slower
pace of new construction. Our estimate of the flow discharged to the Spring Valley Sanitation
District decreased due to the use of actual metering results instead of an Equivalent Dwelling
Unit count. Our current estimates indicate that the City flow will reach the capacity reservation
with Metro by 2010.
The San Diego Area Wastewater Management District (SDAWMD) took effect on January 1,
1993. The SDAWMD board includes representatives from most Metro agencies and will
manage construction and operation of Metro and Clean Water Program sewage transportation
and treatment facilities. Member agencies may withdraw from the SDA WMD without penalty
. until June 30, 1994. Chula Vista has retained a team of technical, fmancial, and legal
consultants to develop a policy regarding membership in the SDAWMD.
We have verified that our capacity in the Metro system is adequate for the upcoming year.
However, under the SDA WMD capacity rights may not be treated in the same manner as they
have been under the Metro system. Discussions are ongoing in this regard to assure that
adequate capacity will be available regardless of the entity the City deals with.
A proposed 6 mgd Otay Valley Water Reclamation Plant was origina1ly included as part of the
Clean Water Program with a proposed start-up date of 1998. The City of San Diego
subsequently decided to indefinitely postpone work on all water reclamation plants in the Clean
Water Program other than the North County facility. Various options for fmancing,
constructing and operating the plant are being considered, but no decisions have yet been made.
Drain.lre
No major problems can be attributed to new growth in the City during calendar year 1993.
One reason for this is that developers have constructed detention basins so that downstream
flows are not increased. Each new subdivision is required to construct all drainage facilities to
handle storms of a 10 to 100 year magnitude, depending on the type of facility and size of
drainage basin. In 1992 and 1993, approximately 560 and 450 dwelling units, respectively,
were constructed in the City, primarily in the Eastern Territories.
Developers are also required to dedicate land and to construct drainage facilities necessary to
serve th.eir proposed developments. Drainage facilities benefitting an extensive area with
/:_ 2 _
-4-
January 11, 1994
~
multiple owners may be fmanced through the establishment of assessment districts. Ordinance
No. 2384 established a fee of 53,9221acre for new development in the Telegraph Canyon Creek
Drainage Basin to fund improvements to the Telegraph Canyon Creek east and west of
Interstate-80S. The improvements east of Interstate-80S have been completed, leaving only
the segment of the channel between Hilltop Park and Fourth Avenue unimproved. The
improvement of this segment of Telegraph Canyon Creek will be funded primarily by fees
collected as provided by Ordinance 2384 as development within the Otay Ranch occurs
During the flI'St half of FY 1993-94, interim improvements in the segment of Telegraph
Canyon Creek between Hilltop Park and Fourth Avenue were completed. This interim work
consisted of guniting the most critically eroded sections of the Creek at an approximate cost
of 570,000. Installation of ultimate improvements within this segment is scheduled to be
accomplished in a period of five to ten years based on available funding from the Telegraph
Canyon Creek Drainage Basin Fee. Additional interim facilities may be required during this
time.
A number of drainage projects were recently completed as planned for in the City's Capital
Improvement Program. In Fiscal Years 1991-92 and 1992-93, four drainage improvement
projects were completed at an approximate cost of 51,230,000. These projects:
~
In Sierra Way between Broadway and Colorado,
In Oxford Street between Second Avenue and Del Mar Avenue,
Guatay Channel north of Naples St, Hilltop Drive to 770 feet east,
In Crested Butte Street between Broadway and Welton Street,
corrected outstanding deficiencies in the City's older areas. A major project in the lower
section of the Central Drainage Basin west of Broadway and south of "G" Street is currently
under construction at an estimated City cost of 51,500,000. An additional drainage facility,
a 66 inch pipe, was included in a reconstruction project for Broadway from "L" Street to
Naples Street. This drain runs from Telegraph Canyon Channel southerly to a point midway
between Naples Street and Moss Street, and will help in the alleviation of flooding in the
vicinity of Woodlawn Ave and Moss Street. The cost of this drainage work is approximately
$200,000.
It should be noted that none of these projects were needed for the correction of conditions
created by new development. A list of future drainage projects proposed for the CIP is
.
.
.
-5-
January 11, 1994
This is because the long duration storms of January 1993 primarily impacted the larger,
regional drainage facilities, but minimally impacted the smaller, local drainage facilities. As
stated above, none of these problems are related to new growth or development within the City.
The problems were created by the unusually long period of rainfall, which produced saturation
of the banks of the streams, rendering them subject to erosion. The eroded material from the
banks then was deposited as siltation at locations where the water velocity slowed to the extent
that the water Could no longer transport the material. The construction of new drainage
facilities by the City and by private developers in 1992 'and 1993 have reduced the potential
for future flooding and flooding hazards in both the newer and older areas of the City of Chula
VISta.
In addition to the construction of drainage facilities, developers must obtain National Pollutant
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Construction Activity permit coverage for each
grading operation that disturbs an area of five acres or more, or is part of a common plan of
development or sale totalling five acres or more. This permit program requires a Storm Water
Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), which is specifically developed for each construction site
in order to prevent pollutants from reaching drainageways.
The NPDES Construction Activity permit is issued by the State Water Resources Control
Board (SWRCB) and is administered and enforced by the Regional Water Quality Control
Board (RWQCB). The City does not lJdminister or enforce any of the NPDES Construction
Activity permit provisions or regulations. The City is, however, required to ensure that all
pertinent provisions of the City's Grading Ordinance relating to drainageways, erosion and
siltation control are enforced.
A small scale map showing the outlines of all the drainage basins within the City's Sphere of
Influence is enclosed as Exhibit "B".
cc: John Lippitt, Director of Public Works
(F:\HOME\ENGINEER\GMOC94b.REP)
/', _ ..c-
EXHIBIT 'A'
SUMMARY OF UNFUNDED NEEDS
(DRAINAGE PROJECI'S)
-.,
...... Coot .........H... I
.... .... no. -~ FY9S106 FY~ FYv/,.. FY_ FY.....l COMMBNTS
n'A OrlllInA\W:IUelO1SO'UllIIraom ....' ....~ ~ ~ ~ .., ~196. BroIion cmtzoI Pru;;'"
lA ......008; ..v-...... ........ ........ .. .. .. .. ~_ UDdiftJiI ICbeduIed [or
~AWIloue w/o Del Mar Awo_ 1PY95196. 'Nt project... DOt &fWD. priority raakin&
!"--It.. DOt,......,..,btemi6Id...lbIftaJe
~iatbe 1964PogReport. Hownw.ilDproYement
ollbllMpMlltottbe Central Buin Qwmel mUlt occur
~;12lI: CoolnIDnIoqe..... L.,.-" ,"",,_...OR.!2ll.
1B -.... ms,'" III III III III ~~-... -+--fllDdlDJiIICbeduIedfor
Street_SIcoodAWllue !PV95JlI6, hrdII~;~ OOOfor.....in FY93194.
~_.~:._- ........ .....uuu .. .. .. ... for flY 95/96.
A......_V...,.Rood..""'y -... -... .. .. III .. p>-iIl'..._.......__..........r"py9SlO6.
. """'T"~_~/IIl""" -... ....... -... III III III ~.':-.""""''''FY_'''_
SIO "H"Street to Sbuta Street 1- inFY9fI97.
Awaue Street to l,IoW ........ III ........ III III .. <<lDItI~ ._("FY~.
Jleet.W.
: ay!~intAWDuetDQwmeI ."'.... ::: ."'.... ::: ::: ..
Tobiu Drive to Maill QwmeI .,...... .,...... ..
'" HIO Diaon Way. Betnen Tobiu Dr. I Orlando S217,100 III S%T1,l00 III III III ~IftdClllDltNCdonfODdiDJ:iltcbeduledfor
~~P'Il'ItAw../OkobIvea Way (DR.92S) 96I'F1. PropoIed for ClJIIItructioa II I poop project.
6D ~obiuDriYeCu/vert S5~'" SO SS~... SO SO SO
6Il CuhwtCrouiD&:Belweeo NlplelSt. and -... III S157,'" .,,,,... SO SO
Way (Dixon Dr.. OllfordSt., Ind
kfleabavenWlvl- =l =l
7 PiCtbAwo W -..""'" -, .,OS'" III .,OS'" aadCOOltNctioaf illCbeduledforFY96197.
M b -100 Peet South 01 .,...... .. .,...... SO
Osl'ord Street to KeDDCdy Street !?-iF IDd ~_.tM.. tuDclia&illCboduJed forFY 90'1.
l!IB joratnap ~ - Ostord St. to 100Ft. South $35,'" III SO $35,'" SO SO Propoeed for ClODItnIc:Iion .. . poIJp project.
:f:m I toll'Oxford St. Channel lIS'''' III SO lIS'''' SO SO
9 -909: JudIon ill. iUto Drive to Tobiu ... mdcoastruc:tioafUDdiD illCbeduJed or J9&
rQA ~CI>an"'.IlolIU....S\.,Mo;'_ $485,'" SO .. 0175.... $310,000 SO DeItF fuodlJ:la It lICbodlllod for Py t{1198.nd comtructioo
Oily RJwr lID6inJ in Py 98199. Propelled (or CODItNction II .
lOB . It! ImprowmeDtI. Main Street. -... SO SO .,...... -... SO sroupprojecL
to HoItist.er Street
17 -; North Broadway Basin, from _,uuu '" .. .. -.... c:::,:rfnlm -:..0.. ClPI. iltcbeduled(orP'Y98/99.
t.er River to Smith Avenue
19 I:~. t.I-OIford~t., _SOO .. SO .. _'00 10 DoIiID-CODItNctioDf~~otcbecluled(or
Pint IDd Second Avenua 98/99, Carried owr from OIU ClPI.
,. I;:~VlA.:..~ Cbanoel-MolUel'llte to $1,3-49,500 .. '" .. J139,SOO $1.Z1o.000 ~ iltcbeduJedforn~~~Ollln
IlmlDrive, Plwe II 99/00. Carried owrftom CJPs.
28 t=;~tDriveto.JdeP'lPb n4S,OOO 10 SO SO SO .,...... ~""'_"":'"~....r"
Road - Bxtend Drainllle-SvStem 99/00. Carried OYer (n,m CIPt.
35 I;:;;;:~; '. Improvemenu - Hilltop .".... .. 10 .. .. m,ouo IDd CODItNctioo fuodiDg iI acbecIuIed (or
SIO Reinltra and NIO Jlclma W.v py 99100. Cuied over from -::~UI CIPI.
TOTALS 100 75'" 100 375... 37'''' ...
.
-.,
6-tP
.
.
.
....
..
r~"\~~\.~ ''. ~ Y \ ' 'V-
N '1,.)'" "1)\ ~ ~'~~"'''.'~ ., ,
S>lt:.,.~~ ~ ~~ e:~ 0 . .1
~~ ~ V::S~~ln~'I~~V~~~, ~, ~"'!!
,,~r\\l[ ,~' ~" ~~ , :\1
-:v- "t-.::;>" ~_._-- - ~ ~'
, ' f'J tv' _._' Jl' >/A. ~ i I
- :.-zI"IJr~ u .:l !
.~~~-' ~~~~ -;~Iv::..~~'l;g~ ~-"i.\\;~,,_~ -
::::;~~~ ~ .~~ -=:. ';( - r~ i'"' " ~
;;.: "~i1\[~~~ ~~K ~ 1'''''' .." -~'l~ ~-<:\- \;~lZz
~ O~-'~\,'((~$~~-~~~~~'~~
'"\ , rrt""~ ,~.... \.. P-:lt"t' ~"~ !! ;!
II ' ~/)rc : ~ *
~ .\) 'l:~~ '~'S ~ )~~~I" . ~ ~ ~~ =
\1 /'cfV2.A~o-,-, ./ 1l~"I~'li~ ~ ~ ~~~~
/. '/r~ ~t''::J ~"& (f'~ ~~:c
::~ ~ zz-~~I~\(~@!( , ~ ~:'C~, ~ ~r'~~ ~ ~~~~' ~ b ~ J,; ~
Fii. ---:::.~ ~\.<I ' ~I~ I)/' ~~:.\ \ IV r:...~, '.;- ~~
r...... '1':11/ ~ ," 'f.' .'1:" "'1"" l'~l,_.:<~ .' J', v'l
r_ ::: '. "2~' ."" I ,. '~I ':': y", \ J, I ,-.: -
1_ ~w? I, I f I ,. ," I ~" ......... ~ ~~ I
~ ~~ ',}\, , ,T~ ~''';.il' ~~~ ~,; 0 ,'~ .[ t
S:i~~(~~'~~~ '; t~f ~t;rtt~ \ ~~~~~X,~
~ k- I..,")-=:/;' ~ ~ - '-- -s~ a~. ~' C
- ~ ,~ ~ -....; ~ r~ "
\....' Ij ]1 ","-
... ');..:, I; _ .\~'-;~.j,<<;
.; 0VV7 ::2, \: ": ""5
,-?')a(u ,X"".:" , ' ....... I I -, Il,~
;> (l ~:.,~ .~ 14,G <1:1I
l~: 1,-' ~,J>~i
~', .~~ ' .'~:'~)=~~
~~ . .. \ " .tm~
~. J '. .,1- --""" :i-IH~I
1 2, ~'~ .A i ~3
, " ~ .~ J<. ,;~ '.;(.' .... .~~. \iil~!
'"~ 't:{..'~ (\\;~l" 1.11'"
L
6-7
.
.
.
MEMORANDUM
TO:
Bob Leiter, Director of Planning
Deputy
Public
VIA:
Cliff Swanson,
City Engineer
Hal Rosenberg, City Traffic Engineer
FROM:
January 28, 1994
File No. HX-026
Works
Di~ct~
~
SUBJECT: 1993 Traffic Monitoring Program Final Report - GMOC
Annual Review of Threshold Compliance
We are pleased to submit the attached Final Report for the 1993
Traffic Monitoring Program (TMP) study. This Final Report provides
a summary of the technical data and analysis performed for the
travel time and speed surveys performed on all of .the arterial
streets in Chula Vista. This information was the basis for
determining the operating performance, in terms of Level of
Service, of all arterial street segments in the City during the AM
peak period (7 AM to 9 AM). Additional studies were also done
during the PM peak period (4 PM to 6 PM) to reevaluate the
operating performance of those segments studied last year which
were found to be operating at LOS C in at least one direction.
Baseline data for the PM peak period (City-wide) was obtained
during the 1992 TMP and the Mid-day peak period will be studied
next year. The travel time studies conducted for the 1993 TMP were
performed from March 1993 to mid-July 1993, which coincides with
the 1993 GMOC Report period of July 1, 1992 through June 30, 1993.
The attached Final Report contains the following information:
Project Background
Arterial Level of Service
Project Methodology
Arterial Segment Classifications
summary of 1992 TMP Study Results
1993 TMP Study Results and Analysis
Arterial Interchange Segments
Conclusions and Recommendations
1993 TMP RESULTS:
All arterial segments studied during the AM peak period were found
to operate at acceptable Levels of Service (LOS C or better). For
those arterial segments restudied during the PM peak period, it
was found that all segments operate at LOS C or better except for
the following two segments which operate at LOS D for one direction
of travel for this two hour period (4 PM to 6 PM):
/1-/
1993 'IMP
- 2 -
January 28, 1994
"""
Otay Lakes Rd.
Palomar St.
(East H St. - Telegraph Canyon Rd.) - Northbound
(1-5 Northbound Ramps - Broadway) - Eastbound
The LOS of D for these two segments are primarily due to two
overloaded intersections. On Otay Lakes Road the problem
intersection is at East "H" Street; on Palomar Street the problem
location is at Industrial Boulevard. In the case of Otay Lakes
Road, the East "H" Street intersection has been added to the
Transportation Development Impact Fee (T-DIF) program. Planned
improvements here will increase the capacity of the intersection,
reduce congestion and thereby improve its LOS. Until these
improvements occur, staff will develop the most optimum signal
timing plan possible tailored to account for the high traffic
demands that result from the nearby college and high school. In
the case of Palomar Street, its LOS should improve in the near
future when road widening improvements associated with the
construction of the Palomar Trolley Shopping Center are completed.
Widening of Palomar Street to six lanes, coupled with relocation of
the Palomar Trolley park and ride signal will provide more capacity
at Industrial Boulevard. It is expected that the LOS on Palomar
Street will not worsen and may improve.
Since the Threshold Standards of the Growth Management Plan specify '"""'\
that LOS C or better shall be maintained, except that during peak
hours LOS D can occur for no more than any two hours of the day,
these standards have been satisfied for the 1993 reporting period.
It is worth noting that during the AM peribd, the arterial
interchange segments along 1-5 and I-80S all operate at LOS C or
better. During the PM period, the interchanges along 1-5 at E St.,
H St., and Palomar St. continue to experience reduced Levels of
Service (some degree of congestion) with the westbound direction of
H St. between Woodlawn Ave. and Bay Blvd. continuing to operate at
LOS E. This is not considered serious because the low Level of
Service ranking is confined to one direction of a short length of
H Street (883 ft.) and represents a short period of delay (37.2
seconds) along this segment. Further, the LOS appears to have
stabilized and remains no worse than what was reported for the base
year. Staff will continue to monitor this segment carefully during
future TMP Studies to track its operating LOS.
For the 1994 'IMP Study, those arterial and arterial interchange
segments which were found to operate at LOS C or less by the 1993
'IMP will be restudied and travel time studies for the Mid-day
period (11:30 AM to 1:30 PM) will be done to establish baseline
data for that peak period City-wide.
-.,
/1-2
.
1993 'IMP
-3-
January 28, 1994
H STREET
During its review of the 1992 'IMP report, the GMOC again expressed
concern regarding potentially serious future "H" St. traffic
prob~ems both east and west of I-80S. Results of the 1993 'IMP
study indicate that during the 'AM period, H St. and East H St. are
operating at the following Levels of Service:
H St.
H St./E.
E. H St.
E. H St.
(I - 5 NB Ramps - Third Ave.)
H St. (Third Ave. - I-80S SB Ramps)
(I-80S NB Ramps - SW College Ent.)
(SW College Ent. - Rutgers Ave.)
EB
BB
BB
BB
(C) ,
(A) ,
(A),
(B) ,
WB
WB
WB
WB
(B)
(A)
(A)
(C) .
Previous studies indicate that during the PM period, the following
Levels of Service are being experienced by these segments:
H St.
H St. IE.
E. H St.
E. H St.
(1-5 NB Ramps - Third Ave.)
H St. (Third Ave. - I-80S SB Ramps)
(I-80S NB Ramps - SW College Ent.)
(SW College Ent. - Rutgers Ave.)
BB
BB
BB
EB
(C) ,
(B) ,
(A),
(B) ,
WB
WB
WB
WB
(C)
(A)
(A)
(B) .
.
At the present time, H St. and East H St. are operating at
acceptable Levels of Service. In the long term, however, traffic
volumes on H Street are projected to increase, partiCUlarly on the
segment between I-80S and Hilltop Dr. which will grow from 37,800
to 49,000 based on buildout of the July 1989 General Plan. This
anticipated growth of traffic on H Street requires careful
monitoring to enable the Traffic Engineering office to recommend
any operational changes that may be appropriate to maintain the
highest Level of Service possible. Staff is continuing to monitor
traffic conditions and examine possible low cost improvements to
increase the capacity of H Street. Implementation of operational
changes to H Street are not critical at this time because of
existing acceptable operating Levels of Service.
.
SR-54 Impact
SR-54 between I-80S and 1-5 opened to traffic in December 1990.
This freeway, which currently carries 63,000 vehicles per day
between I-80S and Fourth Ave., has decreased traffic on the major
east-west streets in the northern part of the City. Traffic on
Bonita Rd. west of I-80S has decreased 7400 vehicles per day from
an Average Daily Traffic (ADT) volume of 38,620 in 1990 to an ADT
of 31,220 in 1993. East H St. west of I-80S, with a current ADT of
37,720, has decreased 1290 vehicles per day since 1990. Bast L St.
west of Nacion Ave. has not been impacted by SR-54. This street
has increased from an ADT of 23,390 in 1990 to 25,320 in 1993.
Additionally, there has been some reduction in traffic volumes in
the vicinity of I~5 as noted in the following table:
1/- 3
1993 TMP -4- January 28, 1994 .........
Street 1990 ADT 1993 ADT Net Decrease
E St. e/o I-5 31,660 24,990 6670
H St. w/o Broadway 30,575 27,350 3225
J St. e/o I-5 16,925 16,230 695
L St. e/o I-5 18,680 18,460* 220
* 1992 Count
SR-54 has also impacted some north-south streets. Fourth Ave.
north of C St. has increased in volume by 10,130 vehicles per day
from an ADT of 21,480 in 1990 to 31,610 in 1993 (due to the opening
of the SR-54/Fourth Ave. interchange). Traffic on Broadway north
of C St. has decreased slightly from an ADT of 19,000 in 1990 to
18,110 in 1993. It should be noted, however, that the
reconstruction of Broadway has caused traffic to use other
alternate routes through the City so the volumes on Fourth Ave. and
on Broadway may change once the reconstruction of Broadway is
completed. Traffic volumes on Second Ave. north of C St. have
decreased from 11,660 in 1990 to 7,360 in 1993 (due to the closing
of the ramps which provided temporary access to SR-54). Hilltop
Dr. north of H St. and north of L St. have been unaffected by SR-54
with current traffic volumes of 8,270 and 8,200 respectively.
.........
SR-125 Status/Update
On November 27, 1993, the City Council approved a fee system and a
program called the interim pre-SR-125 program, consisting of 5 road
segments. The 5 segments would be constructed when required to
provide transportation capacity in the event that the SR-125
freeway (or toll road) is not constructed in the near future.
Caltrans and California Transportation Ventures project that the
SR-125 facility will be constructed and operating by 1998 if it is
constructed as a toll road, however there are no assurances that
this will not be delayed or cancelled. There is a need for a
planned and financed road system in the event that the SR-125
facility is delayed. The interim pre-SR-125 program would serve to
provide such a system, using existing and proposed surface roads.
This system, when combined with transportation DIF road
construction, will provide sufficient capacity to allow Chula Vista
to meet threshold standards until approximately 2007. The
collection of the new fee will be delayed until January 1, 1995, to
give the local economy a chance to recover before putting this
additional burden on new home sales in Chula Vista.
Transportation Development Impact Fee (T-DIF) Program update
On November 27, 1993, the City Council also approved an update to ~.
the City Transportation DIF program. The update reflected recent
changes in proposed developments, such as Kaiser Hospital and the
I-I- 1/
.
.
.
1993 TMP
- 5 -
January 28, 1994
Power Center in Rancho Del Rey. It also included a portion of the
Otay Ranch lying north of Orange Avenue. Another significant
change was to reduce the financial obligation of commercial
properties by redesignating commercial from 400 to 250 trips per
acre, to reflect the fact that many trips from commercial land uses
are "passerby trips", which are really trips from different
locations (such as work to home) which incorporate a stop at an
intermediate commercial location (such as a grocery store or a gas
station). In addition, there were several minor projects added
to the T-DIP to assure that these critical sections of the City's
street system do not become congested. These are:
Bonita Rd. from I-80S to Plaza
Bonita Rd. at Otay Lakes Rd.
East H St. at Otay Lakes Rd.
Elmhurst Dr. at Otay Lakes Rd.
Traffic Signal Interconnection
Bonita Rd. (Street Widening)
(Intersection improvements)
(Intersection improvements)
(Intersection improvements)
(System wide) .
As with the SR-125 DIF fee, the increase to the T-DIP program will
not take effect until January 1, 1995, to give the local economy a
chance to recover.
Transportation Development Impact Fee (T-DIF) Monitoring Program
At the request of the property owners, Staff has formed an
oversight committee, consisting of major property owners and City
Staff, with the goals of providing better communications and
understanding of the T-DIF program and to jointly seek alternative
sources for funding both T-DIP and SR-125 DIP programs. To pursue
the latter, the developers have recommended that a consultant with
specialized expertise in the area of such funding be retained.
Staff is currently working to retain such a consultant.
SM:sm
Attachment
(E:\SM\M-93TMP.DOC)
11-5'
.-"
CITY OF CBULA VISTA GROW'l'B MANAGEMENT PLAN
1993 TRAFFIC MONITORING PROGRAM
FINAL REPORT
-"
.-.
November 4, 1993
1-1-&
..
TABLE OF CONTBN'l'S
lAB
Project Background
Report Organization
Arterial Level of Service
Project Methodology
Arterial Segment Classifications
Summary of 1992 TMP Study Results
1993 TMP Study Results and Analysis
Arterial Interchange Segments
Conclusions and Recommendations
1
1
6
7
7
8
16
24
30
.
,
.
#-7
LIST OF FIGURES -..
Fiaure bsm
1 1992 TMP Arterial Network and
Segment Classification Map S
2 1992 TMP Arterial Segment
Levels of Service (PM Period) 14
3 1993 TMP Arterial Segment
Levels of Service (AM Period) 23
LIST OF TABLES
Table
lA!m
1
City of Chula Vista Growth Management plan
Revised Traffic Element
1992 TMP Arterial Segment LOS (PM Period)
1992 TMP Arterial Interchange Segment
Performance (PM Period)
2
6
8
9
-..
2
Arterial Segment Classification Factors
3
4
S
1992 TMP Arterial Performance (PM Period)
1S
6
1993 TMP Arterial Performance (AM Period)
16
8
9
Arterial Segment LOS Comparison
1992 vs. 1993 (PM Period)
1993 TMP Arterial Segment LOS (AM Period)
Arterial Interchange Segment Listing
1993 TMP,Arterial Interchange Segment
LOS (AM Period)
1993 TMP Arterial Interchange Segment
Performance (AM Period)
1993 TMP Arterial Interchange Segment
LOS Comparison 1992 vs. 1993 (PM Period)
17
7
19
2S
10
26
11
27
12
28
-..
(E:\SM\93TMPFR1.00C)
11-8
'.
.
.
1993 TRAFFIC MONITORING PROGRIUI
FINAL REPORT
PRO.JECT BACltGROOHD
In 1988 the City of Chula Vista adopted a Growth Management Plan
to assist the City in assessing the environmental, fiscal and
operational impacts of proposed land development. One of the
el_ents included in this plan was the Traffic Element which
specified threshold standards for acceptable Levels of Service at
signalized intersections.
Traffic Monitoring Program (TMP) studies conducted in 1989 and
1990 determined the then current operating condition of all
existing signalized intersections in the City and compared them
to the adopted Threshold Standards. In 1991, the Traffic Element
of the Growth Management Plan was revised to conform to the 1985
Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) methodology for determining
arterial Level of Service (LOS) based on average travel speed.
This revised Traffic Element (presented in Table 1) formed the
basis for the 1992 Traffic Monitoring Program which conducted a
comprehensive system-wide travel time study for the evening peak
period (4 - 6 PM). As part of the 1992 TMP, each arterial
segment in the City was checked to assess existing conditions in
the field and a revised Arterial Network and Segment
Classification Map was approved for use with future TMP studies.
This Classification Map, referred to in the Traffic Element as
the attached graphic (shown in Figure 1), has been used as the
basis for the 1993 TMP.
This Final Report will describe the methodology and procedures
involved in conducting the 1993 TMP Study and will analyze and
present the results obtained from the field studies performed for
this project.
RBPOR'l' ORGAlfiZATION
This report is organized into sections which will present the
following information: .
1 .
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
Project Background
Report Organization
Arterial Level of Service
Project Methodology
Arterial Segment Classifications
Summary of 1992 TMP Study Results
1993 TNP Study Results and Analysis
Arterial Interchange Segments
Conclusions and Recommendations
1 )/- f
Table 1
CITY OF CHULA VISTA GROWTH MANAGEMENT PLAN
REVISED TRAFFIC ELEMENT - MAY 1991
""'"
GOALS
* To provide and maintain a safe and efficient street system
within the City of Chula Vista.
* To establish a performance measurement met.hodology enabling
the City to accurately determine existing Levels of Service
for motorists.
* To define a Level of Service (LOS) value that represents a
high quality of traffic flow under constrained operating
conditions during peak periods of traffic activity.
* To establish a performance standard which is consistent with
the Regional Growth Management Standards.
*
To maintain consistency
previous Intersection
methodology.
in terms of LOS ratings with the
Capacity utilization (ICU)
OBJECTIVES
1.
Ensure timely provision of adequate local circulation system
capaci ty in response to planned growth, maintaining
acceptable Levels of Service.
2. Plan new roadway segments and signalized intersections to
maintain acceptable standards at build-out of the General
Plan Circulation Element.
....,
THRESHOLD STANDARDS
* City-wide: Maintain LOS "c" or better as measured by
observed average travel speed on all signalized arterial
segments except that during peak hours LOS "0" can occur for
no more than any two hours of the day.
* West of 1-805: Those signalized arterial segments which do
not meet the standard above, may continue to operate at
their current, (Year 1991) LOS, but shall not worsen.
Rotes t.o St.llIldards
* Arterial segment LOS me-asurements shall be for the
average weekday peak hours, excluding seasonal and
special circumstance variations.
*
Urban and suburban arterials are defined as surface
highways having signal spacing of less t.han two miles
with average weekday traffic volumes greater than
10,000 vehicles per day. .
-..
2 1-1-/0
.
.
.
*
Table 1 (Cont.)
Arterial segments are stratified into the following
three classifications as shown on the attached graphic:
Class I arterials are roadways where free flow traffic
speeds range between 35 mph and 45 mph and the number
of signalized intersections per mile are less than
four. There is no parking and there is generally no
access to abutting ~roperty.
Class II arterials are roadways where free flow traffic
speeds range between 30 mph and 35 mph, the number of
signalized intersections per mile range between four
and eight, there is some parking and access to abutting
properties is limited.
Class III arterials are roadways where free flow
traffic speeds range between 25 mph and 35 mph and the
number of signalized intersections per mile are closely
spaced. There is substantial parking and access to
abutting property is unrestricted.
The LOS measurements of arterial segments at freeway
ramps shall be a growth management consideration in
situations where proposed developments have a
significant impact at interchanges.
* Circulation improvements should be implemented prior to
anticipated deterioration of LOS below established
standards.
*
* The criteria for calculating arterial LOS and defining
arterial lengths and classifications shall follow the
procedures detailed in Chapter 11 of the 1985 Highway
Capacity Manual (HCM) and shall be confirmed by the
City Traffic Engineer.
* During the conduct of future Traffic Monitoring Program
(TMP) traffic field surveys, intersections experiencing
significant delays will be identifie4. The information
generated by the field surveys will be used to
determine possible signal timing changes, geometric
and/or traffic operational improvements for the purpose
of reducing intersection delay.
3
)/-//
Table 1 (Cont.)
*
Level of Service values for arterial segments shall be
based on the following table:
Level of Service Averaae Travel Soeed (MPH)
C1ass 1 C1ass 2 Class 3
A 1.35 1.30 1.25
B 1.28 1.24 1.19
C 1.22 1.18 1.13
D 1.17 1.14 1.9
E 1.13 1.10 1. 7
F <13 <10 < 7
---
Source: Highway Capacity Manual, Special
Transportation Research Board, National
Council, Washington, D.C., 1985.
Report 209,
Research
lmolementation Measures
* Should the Growth Management Oversight Commission
(GMOC) determine that the Threshold Standard is not
being satisfied, then the City Council shall, within 60
days of the GMOC's report, schedule and hold a public
hearing for the purpose of adopting a moratorium on the
acceptance of new tentative map applications based on
all of the following criteria:
~
1. That the moratorium
a causal relationship
established; and,
is limited to an area wherein
to the problem has been
2. That the moratorium provides a mitigation measure
to a specifically identified impact.
,
~
;//2-
4
emSON
'lZ
-
~ ii I'
. ...-
..-..
- --
; .!U
- --
:; _==3il
: ...~':
- ---:-:
I : .!.!.!-:.
- oooac
-
.
iii:'
-' - :.
~ p,
: In
c .
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ~
: ..
. z
: J
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
...
~,.~..
tct" ~
., ~
,,-t'
. .1'i' ,.'"
. ,.'"
.1'i' ,.
~..
~
.
,"1f.
,oft'.
.
.
"
,.
-:-. :
........
..' "'- 4 -'.
.... .. e.
.' ..:........... \ \. ....
.:'.;.~.:.. "'- \ i .
.:. .~ .. "'-'~.. .
.... "'_ \.... /1-13
a
-to
II
...
i
.
c
o
Do
:I
c
:" . 0
"0-
..~..
C - 0
. 0" It
. ~ -
.IL~
.. -
o .. ·
j.!!
~ ~ U
3:....
.. - c
Ie.
~ :I ·
c ..
It .:
0-
..~"
· ~ C
- 0 0
> ~
".w.
o ~
-ClIo
j:!
u....
~~z
o II _
>. ~ !
..
-
U
~
.
..
~
C
---.,
ARTERIAL LEVEL OF SERVICE
The 1993 Traffic Monitoring Program was designed to evaluate
arterial LOS as defined in the Highway Capacity Manual (HeM).
The 1985 HeM uses arterial LOS, which is based on the average
travel speed of through-vehicles on the segment, as the basic
measure of effectiveness used to describe the operating
performance of arterial segments. The average travel speed is
calculated from the running time on the arterial segment and the
intersection approach delay. On any given segment, factors such
as arterial classification, side friction (due to parking and
dri veways) , signal density (the number of signals per mile),
signal timing and progression, and traffic flow can substantially
affect arterial LOS.
The Highway Capacity Manual classifies arterial Level of Service
into six categories, LOS A through F, with LOS A being the best
quality of service and LOS F the poorest. These arterial Level
of Service definitions have been incorporated into the Revised
Traffic Element of the Growth Management Plan and are shown in
Table 1. It should be noted, however, that the LOS definitions
shown in this table vary with the classification 'of the arterial.
The lesser the arterial classification (i. e., the higher the
class number) the lower the speed that is associated with a given
Level of Service. Therefore, a Class III arterial provides LOS C .~
at a lower average travel speed than does a Class I arterial.
In order to evaluate Level of Service for any given segment, the
classification of that arterial segment must first be determined.
These arterial classifications are functional in nature and, as
defined in the Growth Management Plan's Revised Traffic Element,
are summarized in Table 2.
'I:ab1e 2
ARTERIAL SEGMENT CLASSIFICATION FACTORS
Class I Class II Class III
Free Flow Traffic 45 - 35 35 - 30 35 - 25
Speeds ,
Number of Signals < 4 4,- 8 Closely
per Mile Spaced
Availabili ty of None Some Substantial
Parking
Access to Abutting Generally Limited unrestricted "'""'"
Properties None
6
/1-1-1
.
.
.
PROJBCT METHODOLOGY
As part of the 1992 TMP, the arterial network in the City was
determined, each arterial was divided into segments and each
segment was assigned an arterial classification. This arterial
network was the basis for the field studies conducted during the
1993 TMP. Prior to beginning the field data collection for the
1993 study, each arterial segment was evaluated with respect to
the potential impact of local school schedules and proposed
construction and/or street aaintenance projects. These factors
were taken into consideration when scheduling the data collection
phase of the study.
Because of the labor intensive nature of studies assessing travel
times and travel speeds, the 1993 TMP has been limited (city-
wide) to the AM peak period only (7 AM to 9 AM). Limited studies
during the PM peak period were also conducted, however, in order
to reevaluate those segments found by last year's TMP to be
operating at LOS C or less.
The data collection phase of the Traffic Monitoring Program uses
a special vehicle equipped with a computer which records the
distance traveled for each second of time spent driving a
segment. Subsequent analysis of the field data generates
information on travel time, average speed, cruise speed, number
of stops, and delay time along the length of the segment on a
directional basis. A sufficient number of runs must be done for
each direction of each segment to provide a statistically
adequate sample with a minimum acceptable level of confidence of
80' for arterial segments within the City limits. Arterial LOS
is then evaluated according to the HCM Level of Service values
shown in Table 1.
ARTERIAL SEGMEN'l' CLASSIFICATIONS
During the 1992 TMP, the arterial network in the City was
determined and 37 arterial segments were designated for study.
Eleven arterial interchange segments were also designated for
study separate frOm the arterial segments in order to allow the
impact of freeway interchanges on studied arterials to be
evaluated separately from adjacent arterial segments. These
segments were then assigned a classification based on the free
flow speed of the segment, the number of signals per aile, the
availabili ty of parking and the degree of access available to
properties abutting the arterial. These arterial classifications
(Classes I, II and III) are defined in the Growth Management
Plan's Revised Traffic Element (Table 1) and are summarized in
Table 2. Of the 37 arterial segments defined, 25 were designated
Class III, 5 were Class II and 7 were Class I. Of the 11
7 ;-I-IS-
arterial interchange segments, 8 were designated Class III, 1 was
Class II and 2 were Class I. The final arterial network and
segment classifications determined for the 1992 TMP study have
also been used for the 1993 study and are shown in Figure 1.
As can be seen from this figure, all of the arterials which have
been designated Class III are located in the already developed
areas of the City west of I-80S. This lower arterial
classification is necessary due to the constrained operating
conditions of the street system and the nature of existing
development in these areas. The only exception to this occurs on
Main Street between Third Ave. and I-80S where there are fewer
signals per mile, more limited access and parking, and higher
free flow speeds than are typical of other arterial segments in
the central part of the City. In the developing areas east of 1-
805, most of the arterial segments are Class 1. Class II
segments have been designated east of I-80S on Telegraph Canyon
Rd. (west of Medical Center Drive), East H st. (east of Otay
Lakes Road), and Bonita Rd. (east of Willow street) in previously
developed areas where traffic conditions are more restricted.
SUMMARY OF 1992 '1'MP STUDY RESULTS
-...,
The following table summarizes the results of the 1992 TMP ~
showing the number of arterial segments, listed by
classification, which conform to each Level of Service.
Table 3
1992 TMP ARTERIAL PERFORMANCE
(PM PERIOD)
I&S. CLASS I CLASS II CLASS III
A 4 2 2
A/B* 1 1 4
B 1 2 11
B/C* 1 5
C , 3
D-F
TOTAL
8
6
14
6
3
o
* Indicates segments operating at different LOS in different directions.
Table 4 presents the results of the 1992 TMP Study in terms of
arterial LOS, average speed and travel time for each arterial ~
segment and arterial interchange segment studied. Information
from this table on arterial segment LOS is also presented
graph~cally in Figure 2
/-/ - / Ie
8 .
0
E
Table 4
1992 TRAFFIC MONITORING PROGRAM
ARTERIAL SEGMENT LOS (PM PERIOD)
AVG. TRAVEL
SPEED TIME
SEGMENT DIR. LOS (MPH) (MIN:SEC)
Third Ave.
(Class III)
Fourth Ave. - H St.'
NB
C
15.8
5:16.7
4:27.7
SB
C
17.2
4:51.0
H St. - Naples St.
NB
B
22.0
4:05.8
B
SB
B
20.5
4:24.3
Naples St. - South CVCL
NB
C
18.7
5:18.2
Main St.
SS
C
18.1
5:28.2
Fourth Ave.
(Class III)
SR -54 EB Rmps -
H St.
NB
B
20.2
4:27.7
SB
C
18.1
4:58.7
H St. -
Naples St.
NB
B
21.0
4:17.5
SE
B
21.9
4:07.0
Naples St. -
Main St.
NB
B
22.6
3:20.7
SB
B
21.8
3:27.6
Bonita
Rd.
Plaza Bonita -
Willow St.2
EB
A
40.1
1:52.1
(Class
I)
WB
8
34.0
2:11.3
Willow St. -
East CVCL
EB
B
25.8
1:49.2
(Class
II)
WB
B
26.4
1:46.7
East CVCL -
Central Ave-2
EB
A
31.5
1:06.8
(Class
II)
WB
A
39.2
0:53.7
Broadway
(Class
III)
C St. -
H'St.
NB
8
22.7
3:19.3
SS
C
17.6
4:16.5
H St. -
L St.
ME
B
24.6
2:26.8
SB
B
21.2
2:50.1
L St. -
south CVCL
NB
B
19.2
5:47.6
SB
B
19.9
5:35.7
1 Includes 25 MPH speed zone.
2 County Road
9 P -/7
Table 4 (Cont.)
1992 TRAFFIC MONITORING PROGRAM
ARTERIAL SEGMENT LOS (PM PERIOD)
........
AVG. TRAVEL
SPEED TIME
SEGMENT DIR. LOS (MPH) (MIN:SEC)
B st.
(Class III)
1-5 NB bps Third Ave. EB C 16.2 4:09.5
WB B 19.7 3:25.0
Third Ave. Bonita Glen EB B 24.6 2:37.1
WB A 26.9 2:23.8
F st.
(Class III)
Broadway Hilltop Dr. EB B 22.6 3:58.8
WB B 21.8 4:07.8
........
H St./E. H st.
(Class III)
I-S NB Ramps Third Ave. EB C 17.6 3:49.3
WB C 15.1 4:28.5
Third Ave. I-80S SB Ramps EB B 23.6 3: 14.1
WB A 25.2 3:01.7
Bast H st.
I-80S NB bps - SW College Ent. EB A 39.5 4:57.7
(Class I) WB A 36.4 5:22.5
SW College Rutgers Ave. EB B 29.7 1:44.4
(Class II) WB B 24.6 2:06.2
..
Hilltop Dr.
(Class III)
F st. L st. NB B 22.7 3:59.3
SB B 22.0 4:07.4
L st. Orange Ave. NB B 24.1 4:17.8 ........
SB B 21.8 4:44.7
10
1-1- /?
.
.
.
Table 4 (COnt.)
1992 TRAFFIC MONITORING PROGRAM
ARTERIAL SEGMENT LOS (PM PERIOD)
SEGMENT
DYR.
LOS
Xndustrial Blvd.
(Class III)
L st.
Main st.
B
B
NB
SB
J st.
(Class III)
1-5 NB Ramps
Third Ave.
B
B
EB
WB
L st.
(Class III)
Industrial Bl.- Third Ave.
Third Ave. Tel. Cyn. Rd.'
C
B
A
B
EB
WB
EB
WB
AVG.
SPEED
(MPH)
23.4
23.2
22.0
22.0
18.5
20.2
25.0
23.2
TRAVEL
TIME
(MIN:SEC)
3:47.2
3:48.7
3:03.6
3:04.0
3:38.7
3: 21.1
3:49.5
4:07.0
Main st.
Industrial Bl.- Third Ave. EB B 22.2 3:05.3
(Class III) WB A 26.2 2:37.2
Third Ave. I-80S SB Ramps EB A 38.8 2:29.2
(Class II) WB A 31.2 3:05.4
,
. Orange Ave./B. Orange Ave.
(Class III)
Palomar st.
Hill top Dr.
ED
WB
EB
WB
A
A
A
A
Hilltop Dr.
Melrose Ave.
1 Includes 25 MPH .peed zone.
11 )/- /9
27.4
26.7
28.9
26.9
3:24.5
3:29.8
1 :46.1
1:53.9
Table 4 (Cont.)
1992 TRAFFIC MONITORING PROGRAM
ARTERIAL SEGMENT LOS (PM PERIOD)
--...
AVG. TRAVEL
SPEED TIME
SEGMENT DIR. LOS (MPH) (MIN:SEC)
otay Lakes Rd.
(Class I)
Bonita Rd. East H st. NB B 34.0 4:10.3
SB B 30.9 4:34.7
East H st. Tel. Cyn. Rd. NB C 23.5 1:38.6
SB B 34.0 1:08.0
Tel. Cyn. Rd. - Eastlake Pkwy EB A 43.4 2:23.8
WB A 38.2 2:43.1
otay Valley Rd.
(Class I)
1-805 NB Ramps- East CVCL
EB
WB
A
A
43.8
43.2
2:24.7
2:26.7
~
1-5 NB Ramps - Broadway
Palomar st.
(Class .III)
EB
WB
EB
WB
C
B
B
B
16.5
20.7
22.4
20.0
2:10.7
1 :44.7
4: 01.2
4:29.6
Broadway Hilltop Dr.
Telegraph Canyon Rd.
Halecrest Dr. - Med. Cntr. Dr. EB A 33.2 1 :51 .5
(Class II) WB B 27.2 2:16.2
Med. Cntr. Dr.- Otay Lakes Rd. EB A 44.9 3:16.5
(Class I) WB A 46.8 3:08.7
TOTAL ARTERIAL SEGMENTS: 37
~
j-lZO
1')
e
e
e
Table 4 (Cont.)
1992 TRAFFIC MONITORING PROGRAM
SEGMENT LOS (PM PERIOD)
ARTERIAL .Lft"J:JsKCHAHGE SEGMENTS
SEGMENT
E st. (Class III)
Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave.
H st. (Class III)
Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave.
J st. (Class III)
Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave.
Bay Blvd. (Class I)
J Street - Palomar Street
Palomar st. (Class III)
Bay Blvd. - Industrial Bl.
Main st. (Class III)
Frorttage - Industrial Bl.
SEGMENT
Bonita Rd. (Class III)
Bonita Glen - Plaza Bonita
East H st. (Class II)
Hilltop Dr. - Hidden Vista
Telegraph Cyn Rd. (Class III)
Nacion Ave. - Halecrest Dr.
East Orange Ave. '(Class III)
Melrose Ave.- Oleander Ave.
Otay Valley Rd. (Class I)
Melrose Ave.- Oleander Ave.
1-5
DIR.
AS
we
EB
we
EB
we
NB
SB
EB
we
EB
we
I-80S
DIR.
EB
we
EB
we
EB
we
EB
we
EB
we
TOTAL ARTERIAL INTERCHANGE SEGMENTS:
LOS
D
C
C
E
C
D
B
A
C
D
B
A
LOS
B
A
C
B
A
B
A
B
A
B
11
13 /1- zl
AVG.
SPEED
(MPH)
10.7
13.0
16.2
7.6
13.0
12.3
33.2
37.0
18.0
12.3
22.3
31.9
AVG.
SPEED
(MPH)
21.4
30.1
21.6
26.6
28.4
19,5
26.0
24.7
40.3
34.9
TRAVEL
TIME
(MlooN : SEe)
1 :19.8
1:06.0
0:37.2
1:19.6
0:59.9
1:03.6
2:14.8
2:00.8
1:18.3
1:54.6
1:02.7
0:43.8
TRAVEL
TIME
(MIN:SEC)
1 :01 .7
0:44.0
2:42.0
2: 11.0
0:31.3
0:45.5
0:50.0
0:52.6
0:38.3
0:44.3
'"
8
.It
II N
- ("..,
rtr.1S till 1 I .
8.
'zz .I ....
..
-
.
-
ceu ..
.
!!! -
..
I c
I : i
~ I :
I :
II E
I :
. .
0
~ 0
01 -
0 >
~ ~
CL .
CII
. , 01 --
, c 0
-
(1 ~ . --.
0
.. -
- .
c >
. .. ! .
:! ...
0
0 ..
- c
~ .
~ .
0 01
~ .
... CII
C'lI -
ca 0
ca -
~
.. .
~ ..
0 ~
. c
>
.-.. ,..
. ....
.... ~ l&..
. ~ __ e.
............ \ -" ",
." '" .
,:";.~ :'. . ..\ .
'. .... ,. '1
. .,. ~
.. . .... ~ ~
, '.' ",.. ~
, "'....
,." .. // Z
,. ,. . s 17- 2
lit
.
"to'{t.
... . ,.-
- .
,. ,
.-. .
-'I.e. :
-....,
.
.
.
Table 4 indicates that nine arterial segments were found to
operate at" LOS C in at least one direction during the PM peak
period and that no arterial segments operate at less than LOS C.
The following is a list of the arterial segments which were found
to operate at LOS C by the 1992 TMP:
Third Ave.
Third Ave.
Fourth Ave.
Broadway
ESt.
H st.
L st.
Otay Lakes
Palomar st.
(Fourth Ave./C st. - H st.)
(Naples st.~ S. City Limits)
(SR-54 E8 ramps - H st.)
(C Street - H Street)
(I-5 NB ramps - Third Ave.)
(1-5 NB ramps - Third Ave.)
(Industrial - Third Ave.)
(E. H st. - Tel. Canyon Rd.)
(I-5 NB ramps - Broadway)
- NB I S8
- NB I S8
- S8
- S8
- E8
-E8IWS
-EB
-NB
-EB
The Threshold Standards of the Growth Management Plan specify
that LOS C or better, as measured by observed average travel
speed, shall be maintained on all signalized arterial segments
except that during peak hours LOS D can occur for no more than
any two hours of the day. Since 110 arterial segment studied
operated at less than LOS C, the Threshold standards of the
Growth Manageaent Plan were satisfied for the 1992 'l'MP.
Evaluation of the field data from the 1992 TMP Study also
provides information on travel time for each arterial segment.
This data indicates that, depending on the route and direction
chosen, it ta.kes from 5 1/2 to 8 minutes to travel across the
City (west of I-80S) in an east/west direction and from 11 1/2 to
approximately 14 1/2" minutes to travel the length of the City
(west of I-80S) in a north/south direction during the PM peak
period.
In addition to studying arterial segments within the City, the
1992 TMP evaluated eleven arterial interchange segments (6 along
1-5 and 5 along I-80S). The results for these segments, which
are presented in Table 4, are summarized in the following table:
Table 5
1992 TMP ARTERIAL INTERCHANGE
SJGMENT PERFORMANCE (PM PERIOD)
(Number of Segments Conforming to Bach LOS
~ CLASS I CLASS II t'!1'.a.ss III
A/8* 2 4
B/C* 1
C/D* 3
C/E* 1
'l'OTAL
6
1
3
1
*
Indicates .egment. operstin9 at different LOS'. in different directions.
15 1/2.:5
From Table 4 it can be seen that, during the PM peak period,
arterial interchange segments along I-80S are functioning at LOS
B or better with the exception of East H st. (Hilltop Dr. to
Hidden Vista Dr.) which is operating at LOS C in the eastbound
direction. Along 1-5, all arterial interchange segments are
operating at LOS C or better except for the following locations:
~
ESt.
H st.
J st.
Palomar st.
(Bay Blvd.
(Bay Blvd.
(Bay Blvd.
(Bay
- woodlawn Ave.) -
- Woodlawn Ave.) -
- Woodlawn Ave.) -
- Industrial)
LOS D (EB)
LOS E (WB)
LOS D (WB)
LOS D (WB).
Although the City's Threshold Standards exclude segments at
freeway ramps, LOS measurements at interchanges are a growth
management consideration for projects which will have a
significant impact at those interchanges. Because higher volumes
and lower LOS's typically occur at freeway ramp intersections,
LOS A through D operations are considered acceptable for arterial
interchange segments while LOS E and F be considered a
significant impact. Using these guidelines, only the segment on
H Street at 1-5 (in a westbound direction) is impacted by a poor
Level of Service (LOS E) during the PM peak period.
1993 'l'MP S'l'UDY RESULTS AND ANALYSIS
~
This section of the report analyzes and presents the results of
the field studies for the 1993 'l'MP for the arterial segments
shown in Figure 1. The results for the 11 arterial interchange
segments studied are found in the section titled ARTERIAL
INTERCHANGE SEGMENTS which follows this section of the report.
Arterial LOS is directional in nature and is based on both the
classification and the average travel speed of the arterial
segment under consideration. The following table summarizes the
results of the 1993 'l'MP showing the number of arterial segments,
listed by classification, which conform to each Level of Service.
Table 6
1993 'l'MP ARTERIAL PERFORMANCE
(AM PERIOD) .
,
I&a CLASS I CLASS :I: I CLASS III TOTAL
A 4 2 5 11
A/B* 0 1 4 5
B 1 1 10 12
B/C* 0 1 3 4
C 1 1 -.,
D-F 0
* Indicates segments operating at different LOS's in different directions.
16 /1-2~
.
.
.
In addition to a City-wide study evaluating LOS during the AM
peak period (7 AM to 9 AM), limited studies during the PM peak
period (4 PM to 6 PM) were also conducted in order to reevaluate
those arterial segments found by last year's TMP to be operating
at LOS C in at least one direction. Table 7 compares the 1992
operating performance of these segments with their current
performance as determined by the 1993 TMP.
Table 7
ARTERIAL SEGMENT LOS COMPARISON
(PM PERIOD)
1992 VS. 1993
1992 1993
Avg. Speed 1992 Avg. Speed 1993
Street (MPHI ~ (MPH) ~
Third Ave.
(C st. - H st.)
Northbound 15.8 C 19.1 B
Southbound 17.2 C 16.3 C
Third Ave.
(Naples - S. CVCL)
Northbound 18.7 C 19.2 B
Southbound 18.1 C 23.5 B
Fourth Ave.
(SR-54 EB - H st. )
Northbound 20.2 B 18.7 C
Southbound 18.1 C 18.5 C
Broadway
(C st. - H st.)
Northbound 22.7 B Excluded from TMP
Southbound 17.6 C due Rd. construction
ESt.
(1-5 NB - Third)
Eastbound , 16.2 C 18.3 C
Westbound 19.7 B 19.0 B
H st.
(1-5 NB - Third)
Eastbound 17.6 C Excluded from TMP
Westbound 15.1 C due Rd. construction
L st.
(Industrial- Third)
Eastbound 18.5 C 19.4 B
Westbound 20.2 ~ 18.5 C
17 11__ ZS
Table 7 (Continued)
~
ARTERIAL SEGMENT LOS COMPARISON
(PM PERIOD)
1992 VS. 1993
street
1992
Avg. Speed
(MPH)
1992
~
1993
Avg. Speed
(MPH)
1993
~
otay Lakes Rd.
(E. H st.- Tel. Canyon)
Northbound 23.5
Southbound 34.0
C
B
19.5
28.8
D
B
Palomar st.
(1-5 NB - Broadway)
Eastbound
Westbound
16.5
20.7
C
B
12.7
13.6
D
C
Of the nine segments found by the 1992 TMP to be operating at LOS
C, 2 segments (one on Broadway and one on H Street) could not be
restudied due to road construction projects in progress, 5 ~
segments continue to operate at LOS C or better, and 2 segments
have experienced a decrease in Level of Service from LOS C to LOS
D for one direction of travel. On Otay Lakes Road between
Telegraph Canyon Rd. and East H st. the LOS has decreased from
LOS C to LOS D for northbound traffic. This decrease in LOS is
caused by increased delay experienced by northbound traffic at
the Otay Lakes Rd . lEast H st. intersection and represents an
average decrease of 4.0 MPH (from 23.5 MPH to 19.5 MPH) over the
length of the segment for this class I arterial. On Palomar
Street between the 1-5 NB ramps and Broadway the LOS has
decreased from LOS C to LOS D for eastbound traffic. This
decrease in LOS is due to increased delay experienced by
eastbound traffic at the Palomar St./lndustrial Blvd. and Palomar
St./Trolley Station intersections and represents an average
decrease of 3.8 MPH (from 16.5 MPH to 12.7 MPH) over the length
of the segment for this class III arterial.
Table 8 presents ~he results of the 1993 TMP study in terms of
arterial LOS, average speed and travel time for each direction of
each of the arterial segments studied. The LOS information from
this table is also presented graphically in Figure 3.
,-.,
18
Ii zlc
'.
,'1'able 8
1993 TRAFFIC MONITORING PROGRAM
ARTERIAL SEGMENT LEVELS OF SERVICE
(AM PERIOD)
SEGMENT
DIR.
LOS
Third Ave.
(Class III)
Fourth Ave. - H st.' NB C
SB B
H st. - Naples st. NB B
SB B
Naples st. South CVCL NB B
SB B
Fourth Ave.
(Class III)
SR-54 EB Rmps - H st. NB A
. SB B
H st. - Naples st. NB B'
SB B
N~les st. - Main st. NB A
SB B
Bonita ad.
AVG.
SPEED
(MPH)
TRAVEL
TIME
(MIN:SEC)
18.5 4:30.0
20.0 4:09.3
24.0 3:45.0
22.6 3:59.5
20.2 4:54.0
22.6 4:22.8
25.6 3:30-.8
21.7 4:09.0
20.0 4:29.7
23.2 3:53.3
27.3 2:46.0
24.0 3:09.0
Plaza Bonita - Willow st. 2 EB A 41.9 1:46.5
(Class I) WB A 43.3 1:43.0
Willow st. - East CVCL EB B 27.0 1:44.5
(Class II) WB B 27.0 1 :44.4
East CVCL - Central Ave. 2 EB A 35.3 0:59.6
(Class II) WB A 40.0 0:52.6
Excluded frOlll the 1993
TMP due to road
construction.
,
Broadway
(Class III)
cst.
H st.
L st.
- H st.
- L st.
NB
SB
NB
SB
NB
SB
South CVCL
.
1 Includes 25 MPH speed zone.
2 County Road
19 11-27
Table 8 (Cont.)
1993 TRAFFIC MONITORING PROGRAM
ARTERIAL SEGMENT LEVELS OF SERVICE
(AM PERIOD)
.-..
AVG. TRAVEL
SPEED TIME
SEGMENT DIR. LOS (MPH) (MIN:SEC)
B st.
(Class III)
1-5 NB Rmps Third Ave. EB B 20.5 3:17.6
WB B 22.1 3:02.8
Third Ave. Bonita Glen EB A 26.4 2:26.4
WB A 27.1 2:22.8
F st.
(Class III)
Broadway Hilltop Dr. EB B 24.4 3:41.5
WB B 21.9 4:06.8
"""'
H st. IE. H st.
(Class III)
1-5 NB Ramps Third Ave. EB C 17.1 3:56.8
WB B 20.4 3:18.0
Third Ave. I-80S SB Ramps EB A 26.3 2:54.3
WB A 28.7 2:39.5
Bast H st.
I-80S NB Rmps -
(Class
SW College
(Class
SW College Ent.
I)
Rutgers Ave.
u)
EB
WB
EB
WB
A
A
B
C
35.0
40.5 .
27.9
23.2
5:36.0
4:49.7
1: 51 ~ 2
2:13.7
Hilltop Dr.
(Class III)
F st. L st. NB B 23.1 3:55.5
SB B 23.0 3:57.0 '"""\
L st. Orange Ave. NB B 24.6 4:12.0
SB B 22.6 4:35.0
20
/!- zg
\
.
Tab],e 8 (Cont.)
1993 TRAFFIC MONITORING PROGRAM
ARTERIAL SEGMENT LEVELS OF SERVICE
(AM PERIOD)
AVG. TRAVEL
SPEED TIME
SEGMENT DIR. LOS (MPH) (MIN:SEC)
J:ndustria1 Blvd.
(Class HI)
L st. - Main st. NB B 24.0 3:41.1
SB B 24.4 3:38.2
J st.
(Class IH)
1-5 NB Ramps - Third Ave. EB A 25.2 2:40.5
WB A 25.4 2:39.3
. L st.
(Class IH)
Industrial B1.- Third Ave. EB B 22.2 3:02.5
WB A 25.0 2:42.3
Third Ave. - Tel. Cyn. Rd.' EB A 25.7 3:43.0
WB A 27.5 3:28.3
Main st.
Industrial Bl.- Third Ave. EB
(Class 111) WB
Third Ave. 1-805 SB Ramps EB
(Class 11) WB
B
B
A
A
22.3
22.9
36.1
30.8
3:04.5
2:59.6
2:40.3
3:08.2
,
orange Ave.'B. orange Ave.
(Class HI)
- Melrose Ave.
EB
WB
EB
WB
A
B
A
A
28.1
24.1
28.4
28.1
3:19.8
3:53.0
1:48.0
1:49.2
.
Palomar st.
Hilltop Dr.
- Hilltop Dr.
1 Includes 25 MPH speed zone.
21 )/- zf
Tabl,e 8 (Cont.)
1993 TRAFFIC MONITORING PROGRAM
ARTERIAL SEGMENT LEVELS OF SERVICE
(AM PERIOD)
-..
AVG. TRAVEL
SPEED TIME
SEGMENT DIR. LOS (MPH) (MIN:SEC)
otay Lakes Rd.
(Class I)
Bonita Rd. East H st. NB B 31.3 4:32.0
SB B 30.9 4:35.2
East H st. Tel. Cyn. Rd. NB C 23.6 1:38.2
SB C 27.3 1:24.8
Tel. Cyn. Rd. - Eastlake Pkwy EB A 44.5 2:10.8
WB A 46.3 2:05.8
otay Valley Rd.
(Class I)
1-805 NB Ramps- East CVCL
EB
WB
Excluded from 1993 TMP
(bridge washed out).
"'"""
1-5 NB Ramps - Broadway
Palomar st.
(Class III)
EB
WB
EB
WB
C
B
B
B
18.7
23.6
23.2
22.9
1:55.8
1: 31.5
3:53.2
3:55.8
Broadway Hilltop Dr.
Telegraph Canyon Rd.
Halecrest Dr. - Med. Cntr. Dr. EB A 33.8 1:49.3
(Class II) WB B 28.9 2:07.8
Med. Cntr. Dr.- otay Lakes Rd. EB A 46.1 3: 11.4
(Class I) WB A 46.7 3:09.2
TOTAL ARTERIAL SEGMENTS: 37
-..
1./- .3 0
22 /7
_ ..n;J$ tJN
~1lJ-...J
8
-;I
. II I')
.. ..
...
I: . I: .
. ...
I ,!. '"
. ... ::I
.. .. UO
. . -
. .. Ia.
..
oe.o - I: .
..
~~~ . I"
..
.. . .
I oe ..i
. .
I .
.
.
III I .
oJ .
.
I .
.
I .
.
.
I .
.
.
I .
.
.
.
. 0
0 -
'" >
uo '"
0 .
'" en
a. ~
uo 0
c
- .
'" -
0 . "0
~ .. > 0
- . -
C .J '"
0 .
:I .. a.
c
0 . ~
- .
~ uo
~ .
0 en
'"
... -
0
I') -
ell '"
ell .
.. ..
'"
~
.-
,~,.~
,,.~
--,.~
. ..~,.""
.~,.""
fI1P~:c
~,....c..
,,cl.
..... 'G-.
'.0 ..... 'i 4. .....
o ........ .,..
......... '" \ \. ".
.., ...~.. ~~:.:. '" '" \ t ".
.~. 0,'. ..... '" '" "'... ~.> .
':;'. .... '" '" '" So ' .
.._...~... OIl.... /I-_? /
--.
Table 8 indicates that five o~ the arterial segments in the City
operate at LOS C in at least one direction during the AM peak
period (7 AM to 9 AM) and that none of the arterial segments
studied operate at less than LOS C. The following is a list of
those arterial segments which were found to operate at LOS C:
Third Ave.
H st.
E. H st.
otay Lakes
Palomar st.
(Fourth Ave./C st. - H st.)
(1-5 NB ramps - Third Ave.)
(SW Collegp. - Rutgers Ave.)
(E. H st. - Tel. Canyon Rd.)
(1-5 NB ramps - Broadway)
-NB
- EB
WB
- NB a SB
- EB
The Threshold Standards of the Growth Management Plan specify
that LOS C or better, as measured by observed average travel
speed, shall be maintained on all signalized arterial segments
except that during peak hours LOS D can occur for no more than
any two hours of the day. The results of the 1993 TMP indicate
that, during the AM peak period, no arterial segment operates at
less than LOS C. For those arterial segments restudied during
the PM 'peak period (4 PM to 6 PM), it was found that two segments
(one on Otay Lakes Rd. and one on Palomar st.) operate at LOS D
for one direction of travel. Therefore, the results of this
year's study indicate that the Threshold Standards of the Growth
Management Plan have been satisfied for the 1993 Traffic
Monitoring Program. ,-..,
Evaluation of the field data from the 1993 TMP Study also
provides "information on travel time for each arterial segment.
The travel time for each direction of each arterial segment
studied is listed in Table 8. This information indicates that,
depending on the route and direction chosen, it takes from 5 1/2
to 8 minutes to travel across the City (west of I-80S) in an
east/west direction and from 10 1/2 to 13 minutes to travel the
length of the City (west of I-80S) in a north/south direction
during the AM peak period.
ARTERIAL 1.1l".nsKCHANGE SEGMENTS
In addition to studying arterial segments within the City,
information was gathered for arterial street segments crossing
freeway interchanges. These street segments, which have been
designated "arterial interchange segments", are generally defined
to begin and end at the major intersections along the studied
arterial which are immediately beyond the intersections of the
freeway ramps with the local streets. Defining arterial
interchange segments in this way allows the impact of the freeway
interchange on the studied arterial to be evaluated separately
from adjacent arterial segments. This is important because ........
arterial segments are subject to the Threshold Standards of the
Growth Management Plan while segments at the freeway ramps are
not subject to these Standards.
24/1-22
.
.
.
The following table lists the eleven arterial interchange
segments that have been designated for study:
Table 9
ARTERIAL INTERCHANGE SEGMENT LISTING
1-5
E Street
H Street
J Street
Bay Blvd.
Palomar st.
Main st.
(Bay Blvd.
(Bay Blvd.
(Bay Blvd.
(J street
(Bay Blvd.
(Frontage
- Woodlawn Ave.)
- Woodlawn Ave.)
- Woodlawn Ave.)
- Palomar street)
- Industrial Bl.)
- Industrial Bl.)
- Class III
- Class III
- Class III
- Class I
- Class III
- Class III
Bonita Rd.
East H st.
Tele. Cyn Rd.
E. Orange Ave.
Otay Valley Rd.
I-80S
(Bonita Glen - Plaza Bonita)
(Hilltop Dr. - Hidden vista)
(Nacion Ave. - Halecrest Dr.)
(Melrose Ave.- Oleander Ave.)
(Melrose Ave.- Oleander Ave.)
- Class III
- Class II
- Class III
- Class III
- Class I
Due to the short length of arterial interchange segments, and the
close spacing of traffic signals in these areas, travel times
obtained on any given segment could vary significantly. This
variation was caused by the difference between traveling a
segment with no delay at any. traffic signal and traveling the
same segment being delayed at one or more intersections. Because
of this wide variation in the field data, it was not possible to
achieve an 80' level of confidence for some of the arterial
interchange segments studied without doing a prohibitive number
of data runs. In those cases, studies were limited to 20 data
runs in the affected direction. Of the 11 arterial interchange
segments studied, the following 7 directional studies were
limited to 20 data runs each with a level of confidence of less
than 80':
ESt.
H st.
J st.
Palomar st.
(Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave.) - EB, WB (PM)
.{Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave. ) - WB (PM)
(Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave.) - EB (PM)
(Bay Blvd. - Industrial Blvd.)- WB (PM)
H st. (Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave.) - EB (AM)
Tele Cyn Rd. (Nacion Ave. - Halecrest Dr.) - WB (AM).
The results for the AM period for the arterial interchange
segments studied in the 1993 TMP are presented in Table 10. The
Level of Service information shown in this table is summarized in
Table 11.
25 //..1.5
Table 10
1993 TMP ARTERIAL INTERCHANGE ""'""
SEGMENT LOS (AM PERIOD)
ARTERIAL INTERCHANGE SEGMENTS
1-5
AVG. TRAVEL
SPEED TIME
SEGMENT DIR. LOS (MPH) (MIN:SEC)
E Street (Class III) EB C 17.8 0:48.1
Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave. WB C 17.3 0:49.6
H Street (Class III) EB C 14.5 0:41.5
Bay Blvd. - woodlawn Ave. WB C 13.0 0:46.5
J Street (Class III) EB B 20.1 0:38.7
Bay Blvd. - Woodlawn Ave. WB C 18.5 0:42.1
Bay Blvd. (Class I) NB B 31.8 2:20.7
J street - Palomar street SB A 36.6 2:02.3
Palomar st. (Class III) EB C 17.0 1:23.2
Bay Blvd. - Industrial Bl. WB C 17.6 1 :20.2
Main street (Class III) EB B 21.4 1 :05.3
Frontage - Industrial Bl. WB A 31.3 0:44.7 ""'""
I-80S
AVG. TRAVEL
SPEED TIME
SEGMENT DIR. LOS (MPH) (MIN:SEC)
Bonita Rd. (Class III) EB B 20.5 1:04.6
Bonita Glen - Plaza Bonita WB B 22.6 0:58.4
East H st. (Class II) EB C 22.5 2:35.2
Hilltop Dr. - Hidden Vista WB B 25.7 2:15.9
Telegraph Cyn Rd. (Class III) EB B 22.0 0:39.8
Nacion Ave. - Halecrest Dr. WB B 19.4 0:46.8
,
East Orange Ave. (Class III) EB A 28.2 0:46.0
Melrose Ave.- Oleander 'Ave. WB B 24.9 0:52.1
Otay Valley Rd. (Class I) EB A 38.0 0:40.7
Melrose Ave.- Oleander Ave. WB A 37.8 0:40.8
-..,
TOTAL ARTERIAL INTERCHANGE SEGMENTS: 11
26 /1.3 /.f
.
.
.
1993
Table 11
'l'MP ARTERIAL INTERCHANGE
SEGMENT PERFORMANCE
AM PERIOD
(Segments Conforming to Each LOS)
~
CLASS I CLASS II CLASS In
1
1 2
2
1 1
3
TOTAL
A
A/B*
B
B/C*
C
D-F
1
3
2
2
3
o
* Indicates segments operating at different LOS'. in different directions.
From the information shown in table 10 it can be seen that during
the AM period arterial interchange segments along I-80S are
functioning at better overall Levels of Service than segments
along 1-5. Along I-80S, every arterial interchange segment is
operating at LOS B or better with the exception of East H st.
(between Hilltop Dr. and Hidden Vista Dr.) which is operating at
LOS C in the eastbound direction. Along 1-5, all arterial
interchange segments are operating at LOS C or better during the
AM period.
In addition to studying all arterial interchange segments during
the AM peak period (7 AM to 9 AM), limited studies during the PM
peak period (4 PM to 6 PM) were also conducted in order to
reevaluate those segments found by last year's 'l'MP to be
operating at LOS C or less in at least one direction. Table 12
compares the 1992 operating performance of these segments with
their current performance as determined by the 1993 TMP.
,
27
/!~
~able 12
1993 TMP ARTERIAL INTERCHANGE --.,
SEGMENT LOS COMPARISON
(PM PERIOD)
1992 VS. 1993
ARTERIAL INTERCHANGE SEGMBNTS
1-5
1992 1993
Avg. Speed 1992 Avg. Speed 1993
Seament (MPH) ~ (MPH) ~
E Street
(Bay - Woodlawn)
Eastbound 10.7 D 16.6 C
Westbound 13.0 C 12.1 D
H Street
(Bay - Woodlawn)
Eastbound 16.2 C 15.0 C
Westbound 7.6 E 8.4 E
""'"
J Street
(Bay - Woodlawn)
Eastbound 13.0 C 14.5 C
Westbound 12.3 D 15.1 C
Palomar Street
(Bay - Industrial)
Eastbound 18.0 C 10.4 D
Westbound 12.3 D 15.2 C
I-80S
,
1992
Avg. Speed
(MPHI
1992
~
1993
Avg. Speed
(MPHI
1993
~
Seament.
East H st.
(Hilltop- Hid. Vista)
Eastbound 21.6
Westbound 26.6
C
B
20.2
28.2
C
B
""'"
28
/1- J!o
. From the information provided in table 12 it can be seen that,
during the PM period, all arterial interchange segments studied
are operating at LOS C or better except for the following
locations:
B st.
H st.
Palomar st.
(Bay Blvd.
(Bay Blvd.
(Bay
- Woodlawn Ave.) -
- Woodlawn Ave.) -
- Industrial)
LOS D (WB)
LOS B (WB)
LOS D (BB).
.
At the present time, the City's Threshold Standards exclude
segments at freeway ramps. The Standards do note, however, that
LOS -.asurements on segments at freeway ramps shall be a growth
aan&gement consideration in situations where proposed
developments have a significant impact at interchanges. Since
higher volume levels and lower Levels of Service are typically
anticipated at freeway ramp intersections, LOS A through D
operations are considered acceptable for arterial interchange
segments while LOS E and F are considered a significant impact
and are unacceptable. Using these guidelines, the 1993 TMP Study
indicates that only the segment on H Street between Bay Blvd. and
Woodlawn Ave. (in a westbound direction during the PM peak
period) is impacted by a poor Level of Service (LOS E).
Comparison of this year's data with last year's study indicates
that the LOS for this segment has not changed and that the
average travel speed along the segment has remained about the
same (7.6 MPH in 1992 compared to 8.4 MPH in 1993).
When evaluating poor Levels of Service for arterial interchange
segments, the following factors must be considered:
1. Most segments are short with controlled intersections
spaced from 130' to 750' apart. This causes traffic delayed
at freeway ramp intersections to back up along the length of
the segment.
2. Segments along 1-5 also have trolley crossings close to
the northbound ramp intersections. Grade crossings for the
trolley restrict the speed of vehicles as they cross the
tracks. Also, due to the frequency of trolley operations
during daylight hours, additional delay will be experienced
by vehicles at the intersections of the arterial and the
freeway ramps.
.
3. Traffic signals at freeway ramps are under the
jurisdiction of Caltrans and, therefore, are not part of
Chula Vista's signal system. Typically, Cal trans signals
favor traffic on the ramps. This keeps traffic on the ramps
from backing up onto the freeway but increases the delay to
traffic on the street crossing the freeway.
With respect to the segment on H Street at 1-5, all of these
factors are present. Also, the existence of a major transit
center at this location serves to increase the volume of traffic
attracted to this interchange.
,
29
/-1- -2;7
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
.......,
The purpose of the 1993 TMP Study is to assess the Level of
Service of arterial segments for compliance to the Threshold
Standards of the Growth Management Plan. These Threshold
Standards specify that LOS C or better, as measured by observed
average travel speed, shall be _intained on ;all signalized
arterial segments except that during peak hours LOS D can occur
for no more than any two hours of the day. The 1993 Study
indicates that, during the AM peak period, no arterial segment
operates at less than LOS C. For those arterial segments
restudied during the PM peak period (4 PM to 6 PM), it was found
that two segments (one on Otay Lakes Rd. and one on Palomar st.)
operate at LOS D for one direction of travel. '1'berefore, the
results of this year's study indicate that the 'l'breshold
standards of the Growth Manageaent Plan bave been satisfied for
the 1993 Traffic Monitoring progr_. It is rec.: ended, however,
that traffic .oveaents at the intersections of Bast B st./Otay
Lakes Rd., Industrial Blvd./Paloaar st., and Palomar st./Trolley
station Entrance be studied to deteraine whether changes to the
signal timing at these intersections can be iapleaented which
will improve their operating LOS.
In addition to studying arterial segments, the 1993 TMP also
assessed the operating LOS of 11 arterial interchange segments
during the AM period and reevaluated 5 segments during the PM
period. Although the City'S Threshold Standards exclude segments ~.
at freeway ramps, arterial interchange segments are studied to
obtain information to aid in evaluating the impact of proposed
developments on existing interchanges. Using existing
guidelines, which consider LOS A through D as acceptable for
arterial interchange segments, only one segment is impacted by a
poor Level of Service (LOS E). As was found by last year's
study, the segment on H Street between Bay Blvd. and Woodlawn
Ave. (in a westbound direction) continues to operate at LOS E
during the PM peak period. This is not considered .critical,
however, since the segment is short (883'), with the increased
travel time resulting from this LOS E condition only representing
a difference of 32 seconds between the average travel time
experienced by westbound traffic (at LOS E) and the average
travel time experienced by eastbound 'traffic (at LOS C). It is
reo-"",.~ed, however, that this arterial interchange segment
continue to be carefully .onitored during future 'l'IIP studies to
track the Level of Service of the segment.
For the 1994 'l'IIP study, it is reo- eDded that. those arterial and
arterial interchange segments which were found to operate at LOS
C or less by the 1993 DIP be restudied and that travel tiae
studies for the Mid-day period (11 :30 AM to 1 :30 1'11) also be done
to establish baseline data for that peak period.
(B:\SM\93TMPFR2.DOC)
I'u.: HX-026
......
30
/1-32
")
')
")
.
IftBRDBPDTIIDl'lAL COJUlBSPO!1DBlfCB
nox:
February 24, 1994
Growth Management Oversight commission
Robert Leiter, Planning Director~~ - ~
Susan B. Merrill, Interim Finance Administrator~
DATB:
'fO:
VIA:
SUBJBCT:
I'ISCAL OVBRVIn
The purpose of this report is to update the Growth Management
oversight Commission (GMOC) regarding the economic and fiscal well
being of the city of Chula vista. Specific areas addressed are
Development Impact Fees (DIF) and the impact of the recession and
the State of California's budget process on the City of Chula
Vista.
. DeveloDment ImDact Fees
The purpose of the city's DIF programs are to identify public
facilities and improvements required to support future development
within the city of Chula Vista's general planning area. Where an
additional facility need is created by future development, the cost
associated with the new need is apportioned to future development
in the form of a development impact fee.
In many instances, the construction of a particular facility is
triggered when development reaches a certain number of units or
level of traffic generation. If development slows down, then the
need for the facility is delayed. If development accelerates, then
it also accelerates the need for facilities. In some instances,
developers advance fund and construct facilities and they are given
a credit against payment of future development impact fees.
The City's current DIF programs are for Transportation, Drainage,
and various Public Facilities. A new Telegraph Canyon Sewer DIF
was added this 1st year. Attachment One is a DIF Financial Report
that indicates the revenue and expenditure activity of each DIF
Fund for FY 1992-93 and the Fund Balance in each as of June 30,
1993. The total Public Facilities DIF fund balance remained stable
during 1992-93.
The DIF funds are in their infancy and the city is collecting
revenue for each fund which is designed so that the city growth can
be funded in a timely fashion. There is a yearly update that
monitors these funds and determines the status of the new growth
.
.1"- I
-2-
"""\
and our funding mechanisms. Presently it looks as if growth is
generating enough revenue to fund current projects. The
departments that coordinate the future projects would have input as
to the long range planning aspects that is not available to
Finance.
An overview of the Public Facilities DIF funds which includes the
latest update is Attachment C.
Public Facilities DIF EXDenditures
In Fund 801, Administration, and Fund 802, Civic Center Expansion,
expenditures were related to the relocation of some City offices to
the El Dorado Plaza Building ($44,000). Efforts are currently
underway to purchase a site for the civic Center Parking Expansion
Project.
In Fund 803, Police Department Expansion and Improvements,
repayment of a $1.4 million "loan" from the General Fund for the
Police Building Expansion will be made in FY 1993-94.
In Fund 805, Libraries, payment was made for debt service on the
Library Automation Project ($110,000). Few DIF funds were spent
for the South Chula Vista Library design, as a majority of the
design funding came from Community Development Block Grant funds. ~
DIF funds will be used in FY 1993-94 and FY 1994-95 for
construction. However, a loan from the General Fund will be needed
to fund a portion of the DIF share, as insufficient funds will have
been collected at that point.
In Fund 806, Fire Suppression, the expenditures related to the
completion of the City's Fire Training Facility in Rancho del Rey
($146,000). Interim Fire Station #6 in Eastlake was also
completed, which was constructed by the Eastlake Development
Company, who will receive future DIF credits.
In Fund 807, Geographic Information Systems (GIS), funds were spent
for ongoing installation costs ($78,000). The city council
recently approved Phase III for the GIS system. In Fund 808,
Mainframe Computer, payment was made for debt service on the
Mainframe Expansion Project ($42,000). In Fund 809, Telephone
System Expansion, expenditures were related to the upgrading of the
system and installation of a voice processing system ($93,000).
TransDortation DIP EXDenditures
The main project that involved Transportation DIF Funds was the
otay Lakes Road - Phase 3. This total project was for $1,677,000
and was nearing completion at the end of the 1992-93 Fiscal Year.
The DIF programs are updated yearly in order to reflect changes in
estimated project costs, facilities to be included, and projected
"""\
I- 2-
e
-3-
e
growth of the city. Attachment Two-A is selected pages from the
January 1994 update of the Transportation DIF. It adjusted a fee
from the prior $3,060 for single family detached dwelling unit to
$3,998 applicable on January 1995. Also included is a map of
developable land areas, background report for street program,
revised cost estimates for capital improvement projects and the
implementation of Ordinance No. 2580.
Attachment Three is the Council Agenda statement dated April 20,
1993 for the 1993 update of the Public Facilities DIF. The City
Council approved keeping the fee for residential land use at $2,150
per dwelling unit and reducing the fee charged for commercial and
industrial acreage from $12,040/acre to $10,750/acre. These are
detailed in the Agenda statement.
Attachment Four is a description of the Telegraph Canyon Sewer
Basin DIF which is collected on future development east of
Interstate 805 within the Basin at $184 per attached dwelling unit.
The effective date was January 1993.
Attachment Five is the description of the SR125 DIF which will be
collected on future development east of Interstate 805 at a rate of
$820 per detached dwelling unit.
Attachment six is a description of the Telegraph Canyon Drainage
Basin DIF which is collected from future development east of
Interstate 805 within the basin. Fee is $3,922 per acre which was
established in 1990.
Fiscal status
e
Like all local governmental agencies in California, Chula Vista is
doing its best to address problems created by the prolonged
recession and the state's approach, to a large extent, of balancing
its budget on the backs of local governments.
The city's FY 1992-93 General Fund operating budget of $51,000,000
was adopted in June, 1992. The state's action to reduce revenues
to cities, counties, and special districts, by transferring local
funds to school districts, impacted the City'S General Fund by over
$1. 5 million (see Attachment 1-B). The state also imposed a
transfer of property tax increment to school districts which
impacted Chula vista's Redevelopment Agency by $652,655.
The City was able to revise the FY 1992-93 budget and meet the
Council's goals of: 1) maintaining existing service levels to the
general public; 2) not utilizing General Fund reserves to balance
the budget; 3) meeting commitments to the City'S unions as
contained in Memoranda of Understanding, and 4) not laying off any
City employees.
In addition to dealing with revenue reductions imposed by the
.;1:-3
-4-
"'"'"
state, the city also experienced reduced General Fund revenues
caused by the prolonged recession. The city's sales tax revenue,
which represents over 25% of the City's General Fund revenue, went
from $11,679,477 in FY 1991-92 to $11,473,867 in PY 1992-93.
Although only a 1% decrease, it is significant because in non-
recessionary times sales tax revenue normally increases between 4%
to 8% annually. Licenses and permits revenues decreased in FY
1992-93, totaling $1,700,696 compared to FY 1991-92 for $2,037,000.
Fees for services including zoning, plan checking, subdivisions,
and inspections totaled $2,293,256 in FY 92-93 or $32,000 less than
the previous fiscal year.
In spite of the above, the City was able to end FY 1992-93 with a
General Fund balance of $8,337,802 which would be considered
"healthy" under normal circumstances. However, with the
continuation of the recession into FY 1993-94 and the extended
budget deficit issues confronting the state of California, there
will be continuing pressure on the city staff to be creative in
promoting revenue sources and providing services more efficiently.
A brief summary of the 1992-93 General Fund activity is included in
Attachment 1-C.
Included in 1992-93 budget are the uses of one-time revenue sources
of almost $3,000,000. The 1993-94 budget is somewhat dependent on
these sources also which will challenge staff in formulating the
1994-95 budget. The positive outlook for the city in the future is
somewhat determined upon the demise of the recession in which we
are seeing a positive turnaround at this time both at the state and
local level.
Attachment #l-A
#l-B
#l-C
Attachment #2-A
#2-B
#2C-1 -
#2C-2 -
#2C-3-7
#2C-7 -
#2D-1-7
Attachment #3-1-13
Attachment #4-A
#4-B
.........
DIF Financial Report FY 92-93
Loss of Revenue to Chula Vista
General FUnd summary
Addendum to "Eastern Area Development
Impact Fee for streets" Report
Developable Land Areas Map
streets DIF Program Background
Revised Project Cost Estimates
Capital Improvement Projects
Cost Estimate Summary
Development Impact Pee Calculation
Ordinance No. 2580 Relating to Deveelopment
Impact Fee to Pay for Transportation
Facilities in the City's Eastern Territories
council Agenda Statement: Public Hearing of
the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee
Telegraph canyon Sewer
Telegraph canyon Sewer Map
..........
1:- t/
e -5-
Attachment #5-A Addendum to Interim state Route 125 Facility
Feasibility study Report
#5B-1-6 Ordinance No. 2579 Establishing an Interim
Pre-SR125 Development tmpact Fee to Pay
For Transportation Facilities in the City's
Eastern Territories
Attachment #6-A
#6-B
#6-C
#6-D
Telegraph canyon Drainage
Telegraph Canyon Drainage Plan Cost Estimate
Telegraph Canyon Drainage Improvement Map
Telegraph Canyon Drainage Basin Map
e
e
-r: c;-
<
I
-
""
.....
z:
...
E
::E:
U
<
.....
.....
<
i
.. ~
~~'"
~....
u..o
t;;!ll!
--..
U~
~..
i~
..
~
o
~
N
....
N
..
::a
..Oa
CUM
e:!!
~a
d~i
=~C>>
I
Ih
....
..
~lrA
ui
- ..
1;2
l!l-
S~:l!
....iIS
!!;..
~
h
..
...lil:f:
~~iIS
a
..
~
.. -
u ..'"
~~il
l!!!
u_
"N
~Ii
>...
_)(
u ..
l;!
~..
~ii
~
~l!l
u~oo
..-:ll
l!!~
o
tilll...
..m:ll
.. ..
~
~
i~_
i-:ll
SO
~
!
;:
!!;
15
..
..
o
N
~
~
",'
"'000
~:l\:~
,....,.:: .....
I::!:S
.
0_
o
l
.."
~
.0
-
~
.0
-
J:!
....
.0
l
rJ
I
..
0;
..
o
~
-
00
-
....
5
-
-
U"
NO'"
",on
....
-
~
-
o .
:9
. -
.
.
~
'i.
~
.
. ..
.....
.
.
!
~
....
...
..
i
..;
-
-
-...
~
<i.
-
l"
..
-
~
-
-
i
Ii
-
-
..
0:.
:;
-
-
!!;
ri
-
-
..
....
-
00'
:!!
-
8
....
S
-
8
....
oS
.-
.
~
g'
....
-
-
:51
:!8'
0_
o
-
:i
Iii
-
-
..
-
ii!
...
..
-
i
-
Ii
-
~..
.0
-
~
..'
~
-
~
i
on
-
-
Sl
!
..
5
oj
!
Iii
-
;t!..
-
~
c;
c;
","
-
-
~
on
on
N
-
i
..
i
-
-
..
Ie
:ll'
-
!
1::'
"'a
'"
on
"t
-
-
....
N
&
.0
III
..
N
~
i
N
.-.,
!:
~
~iR.~
.;..;:,.;
_ 0 N
o
.
i
-
..
-
-
-
..
IS
....
-
..
~
-
.:
~
-
-
i i
a a
- -
I
~
..
- ...
nu
-- ..
:=~.!
e~""l
,Pj"l
..I 0
.... ..
-:s~ :
o ..
-
..
on
N
!i
-
...
~
~
-
~
....
l
t3!.!i
~~:~
o
o
:
!;
..
1
..
I- (p
..
~
i
-
i.
ia
~~.~
~....":o
.....N.O
_ 0 N
o
..
~
.:
..
-
~
t
~
"i
-'" ...
I~I~
. "0 15"
N_ 0
....0
- 0
o
..
J:!
....
.0
If Hi I ~
........0... : ,.....
.. 0....
- .-
.
~
..'
..
....
N" N
~~..: ~
"'... o~'
-000
N 0
.
.
~
-
E
..
!;!
.....
Ii!
8
.-.,
~
....
-
-
..... ...
~ te
~.. ~..
0;
..
~
~
!'
i
..
ATTACHMENT #l-A
~
i
.... ..
~,;:
...:: ......
o
o
..
"'...
....-
.. -
.0
J:!
..
~
..;
I::!j;
.. on
fig"
.. '"
~
-
~
..
~
0;
..
!;!!;!
.. ..
~~
....
. !'
1:_
..c
Ii
H
~-
~
~
Z'
..
.
ATTACHMENT 1-B
LOSS OF REVENUE TO CHULA VISTA
PURSUANT TO ACTIONS
BY STATE OF CALIFORNIA
nD
1991-92
1992-93
1993-94
1. Public Library Fundinq $ 60,000 $ 100,000 $ 100,000
2. Area Aqency on Aqinq 20,000 20,000 20,000
3. SB 2557 Bookinq Fees 265,000 270,000 270,000
4. County Property Ta Admin Fees 180,000 180,000 190,000
5. Peace Officer Standards &
Traininq Reimbursement 30,000 30,000
6. Fines & Forfeitures 300,000 300,000 300,000
7"'Ciqarette Tax
108,000 228,000 228,000
8. special Supp Subventions & Redev. 500,000 500,000 500,000
9. 9% Property Tax Shift to Schools 800,000
10. Property Tax Per Capita Reduction 234,000
11. Trailer Coach & Mobilehome
License Fees 50,000 50,000
12. Reduction in Redevelopment 652,000 233,000
Property Taxes (ERAF)
13. Reduction in Redevelopment Aqency 194,000
Property Taxes (Southwest)
TOTALS $1,433,000 $3,364,000 $1,815,000
.
ATTACHMENT #l-B
L- 'l
A'rl'ACHMENT 1-C "'"
GENERAL FUND SUMMARY
AVAILABLE FUND BALANCE AS OF JUNE 30. 1993
Beqinninq Balance 7/01/92
$ 9,851,984
1992-93 Revenues
44,942,414
"Transfers- In
4,936,535
Transfers-Out
(679,120)
Expenditures 1992-93
(50.714.011\
Operatinq Fund Balance 6/30/93
$ 8.337.802
One-time Revenue Received Durinq 1992-93
and Included in Above:
........
i
Fees for SDG&E Bond Issue
625,000
Reimbursement from Port District
400,000
PERS Surplus
Public Liability Reimbursement
1,274,000
400.000
Total One-Time Revenue
&2.699.000
A'rl'ACHMENT #l-C
........
;I-9
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT #2-A
ADDENDUM TO .
"EASTER1\l AREA DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE FOR STREETS" REPORT
(Dated November 9,1993)
Current Program Cost (Table 3 )
Inflation factor (4%)
Subtotal
598,128,585
53,925,143
5102,053,728
53,090,600
598,963,128
DlF revenues projected to 1/95
Adjusted Program Cost ( 1/95)
Current Area of Benefh (AOB) (Table 1)
Est. Permits issued prior to 1/94
Est pennits 1/94-1/95
Permits with EDU credits
Remaining Participants
25,722
(220)
1500 EDU
-750 EDU
750 EDU
(750)
24,752
Proposed Fee
$98 963 128
24,752 EDU
53,998
Ji'@e ap,plirable ~ft'flftive .Janu.." 1 ~ 1995
DevelopmeDt Type
Single Family Detached Dwelling
Single Family Attached Dwelling
Multi-Family Dwelling
Commercial
Industrial
Religious Institutional
Golf Course
Medical Center
Olympic Training Center (OTC)
Adjacent to O.T.C.
Tra_po....tioD Fee
S3,998/Dwelling Unit
53, 198/Dwe11ing Unit
52,399/Dwelling Unit
599,950/Gross Acre
579,960/Gross Acre
515,9921Gross Acre
53,198/Gross Acre
S259,870/Gross Acre
513,313/Gross Acre
S139,9301Gross Acre
ATTACHMENT #2-A
1-7
.
MTTACHMENT #2-8 -
0..
~...
..
;:
.. ..
II ·
. = ~ c
. .. I
':":cc
.. .. I
ii"''''.~c
z ;Sll~
... .. .
.
...
~
<(
~
(f)
-
>
<(
...J
:::>
J:
U
l.L..
o
>-
.....
U
I J
J i
J .
I I
I .
I I
.
C
..
.
c
I
c
~
..
~
.
f
.3
..
>
..
o
~
<t> ".,,'
-
~
(!)
-r........"J
I . r-o
J i
o
.........
ATTACHMENT #2-8
ATTACHMENT #2-C
.
SECTION 1
JACKGROUND
This repcrt represents the 1993 review of the Development Impact Fee for Streets program, and
where appropriate, makes adjustments to the development impact fee based upon completed
meet construction, revised development projections and revised project cost estimates.
In February 1986, the Chula Vista City Councu adopted a lChedule of development m,p-t. fees
(DIP) for the Eastlake I Development. These fees were to ensure that Eastlake paid its fair
Ibare of the cost of specifIC street improvements including a four lane interim facility in the State
Route 115 (SR-115) corridor. Also included in the development impact fee was the cost of
constructing a fire station and a community park in Eastlake I. City staff recommended to the
Councu that a development impact fee ordinance be prepared to provide for the fUllUlCing of
uansportation improvements by all the developments that would benefit from the improvements.
In January 1987, the CouncU authorized the preparation of a development impact fee program
for the financing of street improvements in the area east of Interstate 80S.
. In December 1987, a report entitled the Interim Eastern Area Development Impact Feu for
Streets was completed. The "area of benefit" included all the undeveloped lands that benefitted
from the proposed transportation improvements, within the City of Chula Vista and County of
San Diego, east of Interstate 80S. Bee.',," the Eastern Territories General Plan Update was in
progress, the CouncU adopted an Interim Eastern Area development Impact Fee (DIP) in January
1988 by Ordiftlln~ Number 2251. The fee was set at $2,101 per equivalent dwelling unit
(EDU). The Eastern Territories General Plan AmeDdment was later completed and adopted.
On August 8,1991, the City CouncU authorized the preparation of the -Interim SR-I2S Facility
Feasibility Study." The purpose of this study was to identify an interim SR-I2S facility that will
meet the uansportation needs of the region unill a permanent facility (freeway) could be
constnx:ted. The report recommends the establillhment of a new fee (teparate from the existing
TnDsportation DIP) to specifica1ly fi""~ the construction of the interim SR-I2S and related
facilities. Consequently, Projects 1 and 2 (Table 2), dealiD& with the SR-I2S CODItrUCtion, have
been acluded from the Eastern Area Transportation DIP program and are IIOW included in the
new SR-115 DIP program. Additionally, Project 13 is also included in the W""'.....1Jded
Interim SR.I2S Facility. This project is to be jointly fi---' by the Eastern Area
Transportation DIF and the SR-115 DIF.
SiDce its b.c:e:ption, the Transportation DIP has been upd""" twice, as follows:
.
>>s
December 12, 1989
Decrmber 11, 1990
Ord;nsn'~ Number
2349
2431
~
S2,850IBDU
S3,06OIBDU
This repcrt recommends to change the fee to $3,81SIBDU.
--r II
ATTACHMENT #2-C
ATTACHMENT #2C-2
SECTION 3
........
'lC'.Vl!;F.D PROJECT COST ESTIMATES
Ordi....""" No. 2251, u revised, allows for an annual adjustment to the fees to reflect changes
in the Engineering - News Record Construction Cost Index. The index experienced an increue
of 3.89% for the period of November 1990 to June 1992.
In addition, several projects currenUy under construction were adjusted to more accurately reflect
the actual cost of work completed and more refmed estimA~ for remAinil1i work. These
projects were not adjusted by the ENR Index.
Table 3 presents the projects and costs being funded by the fee. A complete description, cost
breakdown and location map are included in Section 6.
The City will be applying for funding under the State-Local Transportation PartDership program
(SLTPP); Table 3 assumes that 5% of the project's cost ($4,814,265) will be fiNO"""'" through
this program.
Table 3 also includes a cost allocation of $800,000. It is proposed that these funds be used to
buy down the current usessments on undeveloped commercial land where the fee was prepaid
through usessment district proceedings, at a rate of 40 EDU's/Acre. The usessments would
be adjusted to reflect a TDIF fee based on 2S EDU's/Acre u proposed in this report.
The revenue available for DIF project construction as of June 1992 is $6,319,885. The revised
total project cost has been reduced by this amount. This amount includes $1,205,044, which
is the total of the fees to be paid in accordance with the Rancho del by Power Center
Implementation Agreement.
"""'"
Ordinance No. 225 1 states that a developer may request authorization from the City to construct
DIF facilities. In the event that the total construction cost amounts to more than the total fees
which will be required for the development, the owner is entiUed to receive DIP credits. 'This
DIP aedit could be used to satisfy the fee obliptions for any other development. Table 5 lists
pmAinil1i credits for facilities constructed by developers for . total of $7,563,883. This amount
has been added to the revised project cost (Table 3) to obtain the total project cost to be
conected through the Transportation DIP.
The tolal cost of the program to be funded by the fee is $98,128,585.
.
~
._-~..-
1'- /0(
-Q..
ATTACHMENT #2C-2
110293
ATTACHMENT #2C-3
.
TABLE 3
CAPITAL 1MP1l0VEMENT PROJECI'S
COST ESTIMATE SUMMARY
(AS OF JULY I, 1992)
(CUMULATIVE) .
No. DIP Slrect LocallOll IleviIecI ,.......
COlt
1 SlaIe Roate 125 Nonh SuI Mipelto 'hIepapIl CaDJOlI It-' 10 To SR-I25 DIP/CPD
2 SlaIe Roate 125 5C1111h 'hIepapIl CaDJOlI It-' to Ilul 0JuI&e 0 To SR-I25 DIP/CPD
A_
3 TeJopaph CanyOll Road Paleo Del Rey to Eut of Paleo Laden 3,452,000 WideaID& to ~1aIIe prime
3a TeJepapb CanyOll Road 1-805 ~ Pbue D 1,114,000 I1IeJdIu&e lmpIo_ (Pbue
DA il1IIIdcr 00IlIUlIClI0D)
4 TeJepapb CanyOll Road Pbue 1 Rulam to E,,oJ,blloDDdary 0 Project C4lmp1eled
5 TeJepapb CanyOll It-' Pbue D Paleo Laden 10 ApIcIle DrIve o Project C... 1'''''''
6 TeJepapb CanyOll Road Pbue m Apacbe DrIve 10 Rulam Road 1,677,000 ~ lIlI,jor (aDder ClOJIIInICIiOll)
7 Ilul "II" Slrect 1-805 lJIIerdIaD&e ModificaIiOJlS 3,710,000 I1IeJdIu&e .......- (Pbue 1
ccmpleled)
1 Eut "II" SUeeI EutIake Drive 10 5R-125 o Project C _11ted
9 Olay LUea Road .CUIlIno cIeI Cczro GrIDde 10 IWaeback o Project ('..,.1e<~
Road
10 Olay LUea Road TeJepapb CanyOll It-' 10 Ilul OraD&e 4,574,000 COlIIlI1IClIOlI u ~1aIIe prime (OlI1y
Avenue Pbue I . 4 II.- 1DeJ>>d"")
n BOlIIIa Road Olay LUea Road 10 CeDInI ~ve_ S70,ooo W"JdeDiD& to 4-IIDe lIlI,jor
12 BOlI1Ia Road CeDInI A_IO SuI MipeI It-' 792,000 W"JdeDiD& 10 4-IIDe lIlI,jor
13 SuI Mipl Road BOlI1Ia Road 10 SR-I25 1,574,500 Secaad Put of SR-I25 DIP/CPD
14 Eut "II" Slrect SR-I25 10 Mt. MipeI It-' o Project L "11~-'"
15 Proctor Vllley It-' Mt. MipeI Road 10 a.e Punay 5;sT7 .000 ~"",,- u 6-IaI prime
(Ilut "II" Slrect)
16 Ilul 0raJl&e Avenue 010"'-"10 51mbow ..-1loDDdary 6,2i66,ooo ~u~prime
17 Ilul Namar Slrect ()looo. .... to .......... IIuIem IloDDdary 6,712,000 C lII""1I~ u 4-IIDe lIlI,jor
.
;I- /3
ATTACHMENT #2C-3
ATTACHMENT #2C-4
TABLE 3
-."
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
COST ESTIMATE SVMMAR.Y
(AS OF JULY I, 1992)
( CUMULATIVE)
No. DIP Slreel Loc:alion JImIecI p......tr.
CoIl
1& 1'ekpIflIl CaDyon Rood Pbue IV E...1.... J BaIIerIl BeJIIIIduy to 0 Projocl CllIDpIece<!
H_ Plmny
19 IlulIab Plmny TeIDpaph CaDyotl Rood '" E.....". Hi&h 0 Projocl C _ JoIed
School SCJUIbmI ~
20 H_ Putw.y Proclor Volley Rood '" Telegraph Canyon 4,395,000 CoIIIlnKUon u ~.. _lor
Road
21 H_ Putway Telegraph Canyon Rood '" Club HOUIC 0 Project CamplI"."
Drive
21. H_ Putw.y Club House Drive '" But OJuae AvellllO 1,250,000 COIIIlrIIdion u ~ ~or
22 I!ut OIaD&e AvellllO EuIIate Putw.y '" H_ Putw.y 6,356,000 CoaIaIIdioD u ~.. primo
23 Paleo ItaDchoro Telegraph Canyon Road '" But OrIJl&e 3,311,000 CoIIIlnKUon u ~.. primo (only
Avenuo PIwo J . 4 ~ iDc1wIod)
24 But OIaD&e AvellllO Eutem Sunbow BOUDdary '" JlulIIke 18.J!1,GOO CoIIIlnKUon u ~ primo
Putway 11'l55,.o p..
25 But OIaD&e AvellllO )..&05 Jnlercb.ange Mcxtificalions 4,064,000 JnlercIwlae JmprovemeDIJ
26 I!ut PaIDmar Street J!ulem Sunbow BeJIIIIduy '" Plleo 3,120,000 ~CIDu~~or
IWIchoro
27 But PaIDmar Street J-I05 lJIlen:haDae 2,673,000 JnlercIwlae ~(I-
21 Telep81111 Cany.on Road H_ Putway '" WucIle Road 3,114,000 C~onu~~or
29 But OIaD&e AvellllO H_ Putw.y '" Olympic TniDin& Caler 5,104,000 ~onu~~or
30 Telepapll CaDyotl Rood 0-125 '" Jludo". Plmny 1,493,1lOO WidIDIn& '" J.IaDa primo
31 I........ Plmny PcaIon Slreel '" TeIDpaph CaDyotl Rood lIIO,4O!I WidIDIn& '" 6-IaIII ~
32 I!ut "H' Slreel J..I05 '" Bidden VillI Drive 1101,000 WidIDIn& '" & lI.-
33 JIoDIla 8ad 011)' LabI Rood lIIWI 70tl 105,000 s....tJlC(""'''''''_ .
34 OIly LIbo Rood ~Drive~ '10,000 ... n:il:r. ......v......
35 But "II" Slreel 011)' LabI Rood JdaIecliotl 221,000 IlIiW -.I,.. ........A'11DD18
36 TraIIk: IIpal s,- wide 131,000
1IIIm- OIion
~
.Jr r.u1ftQ q...t."
~
,......._~.........UlIn",NAR
J: - /1/
-11-
ATTACHMENT #2C-4
llO293
ATTACHMENT #2C-5
.
TABLE 3
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
COST FSTlMATE SUMMARY
(AS OF JULY I, 1992)
( CUMULATIVE)
No. DIP SInet LocaIion JImIed p-...
COIl
37 Sa....... Pukway E.flI'''' JIi&h Scbool SoalII8nl JIouDduy 10 1,!ll.0D0 ~.-lICllGa u 4-JoDe lIlIjor
Eat 0rIJIIe A_ ~, 2'-6,60'
31 Eat "If' SInet Pueo Del Re)' 10 TIma DelRey 612,000 Is;;. WideDID&
39 BcmIIa Road 1-805 10 Plaza BODiIa Road 270,000 SInet WideDID&
IMlTOTAL I "/~;H':)80
SWe-Local 'I'I'IDspOIUlion 5. of Projecll (4,814,265)
PalUIODhip ProIflll1
MaIdliD& Punds
Coaunercia1 Land Pee 800,000
~
~~
ttA TOTAL , ,35
DIP prolflll1 support 5. of IOIal project cost 4,613,552
AvalIable Revenue Leu funds avallable for DIP COIlIltUClion (6,319,885)
p.ft\.m~"1 Credits See Table 5 7,563,883
GRAND TOTAL "uit,i;a;!iS
"* "tevl..... ""I.~ .
~~ u-d,."""C"\~..c54r\......:r...."of
.
J- Is
ATTACHMENT #2C-5
...
_11_
ATTACHMENT #2C-6
.......,
TABLE 4
COMPLETED DIF PROJECTS
(AS OF JULY I, 1992)
(CUMULATIVE'
No. DIP SUeet LocItlon Colt
1 East"H"SUeet ':""MllIllIh Rm:bo DelIley $4,372,696
2 Olay Labs RollI ,..I-.soclion wiIh East "H" Stteet 328,921
3 Tc!qnph CaDyon ROI4 Pueo dellley to East of Pueo LIdaa 350,037
(1OlIdI1idc)
4 Telegraph Canyon Road 1-805 IDIen:JIaD&eJPhase 1 174,332
5 Olay Labs ROI4 ('_inn del Cerro GrmIe to Jtidaeback 6,227 ,169
Road
6 CeDtral Avenue Bonica Road to Corra1 Canyon 190,000
,
7 Telegraph Canyon Road Phase 1 . Rataers ROI4 to Ro..t.~ 6,671,052
BouDdary
8 Telegraph Canyon Road Phase n - Pueo ladcra to ApIcbe 11,118,765
Drive
9 East "H" Street Phase 1 . 1-805 MocIifl....tiQIIS 577,155
10 East1ake Parkway Telegraph Canyon ROI4 to Soutban 1,883.636
High SdIoo1 BouDdary
11 H\IIIte Parkway Telegraph Canyon ROI4 to Club House 1,251,299
Drive
12 East "H' Street EU't.~ Drive to SR-I251Dd 2,075,047
SR-I25 to Mt. MiJUel Road
13 Telegraph Canyon Road t:...t.t.p BouDdary to 'H\IIIte Partway 3,388,518
GRAND TOTAL 138,608,626
COMPLETED
Note: 0 - UDder mvision
.
-..
.
-.,
1- -/&
ATTACHMENT #2C-6
t"2
11-
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT #2C-7
Table 6
Development 1ntp'lCt Fee Cakn1at19D
Per li'.........1Pnt n.-mnD Unit
TOIIl Cost
of l"U'mvements
TOIIl EDU's
-
198.128585 - $3,814.97/EDU
25,722 EDU's Use: $3,81SIEDU
1993 RevJsed Eutern Area
Devpl'lJ)ment Imn.a Fees for Streets
Category Existing Fee 1993
Revised Fee
Single Family Detached $3,060/DU 3,81S/DU
Single Family Attacbed 2,448/DU 3,OS2/DU
Multi-Family l,836/DU 2,289/DU
Commerciall Acre 122,4001 AC 9S,37SIAC
Industriall Acre 61,200/AC 76,300/AC
Religious Institution ll,4OO/AC lS,260/AC
OTC 10, 190/AC N/A
Golf Course 2,448/AC 3,OS2lAC
Medical Center - 2A7,97SIAC
:r-/1
ATTACHMENT #2C-7
.^
lIMOS
ATTACHMENT #2-0
ORDINANCE NO. 2580
-..
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA,
CALIFORNIA AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 2251,
RELATING TO DEVELOPMENT IMPACT FEE TO PAY FOR
TRANSPORTATION FACnJI'IES IN THE CITY'S EASTERN
TERRITORIES
WHEREAS, in January 1988, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista adopted
Ordinance No. 2251 establishing a development impact fee for transporlation facilities in the
City'. eastern taritories, and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Ordinance No. 2251, the City has commenced the collection of
development impact fees to be used to construct transportation facilities to accommodate
increased traffic generated by new development within the City's Eastern Territories, and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section l(c) of Ordinance No. 2251 and California Government
Code Sections 66000, et. 1Cq., the City Council has caused a study to be conducted to reanalyze
and reevaluate the impacts of development on the transportation system for the City's eastern
territories and, to further reanalyze and reevaluate the development impact fee necessary to pay
for the transportation facilities which financial and engineering study prepared by City staff, is -..
entitled -Eastern Area Development ImpactFccs for SUCCts 1993 Revision- dated July 13, 1993,
and
WHEREAS, the financial and engineering study and the City'. General Plan show that
the transportation network will be adversely impacted by new development within the eastern
territories unless new transportation facilities arc added to accommodate the new development,
and
WHEREAS, the financial and engineering studies and the City's General Plan establish
that the transportation facilities necessitated by development in the eastern taritorics comprise
an integrated netWork, and
WHEREAS, the City Council has dctcrmincd that developers of land within the Eastern
Territory should be required to mitigate the burden created by cIeve10pment through the
constrIICtion of transportation facilities within the boundaries of the development, the
constrIICtion of those transportation facilities outside the boundaric:I of the development which
IJ'C aeedec.f to provide service to the development in ICCOrdance with City standards and the
payment of a development impact fee to finance the development'. portion of the costs of the
1rIDIpOrtation network, and
WHEREAS, the City Council bcrcby determines that the lqislativc findings and
determinations set forth in Ordinance No. 2251 continue to be true and correct, and -..
I- /5'
Page 1
ATTACHMENT #2-0
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT #20-2
WHEREAS, on July 27, 1993, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista held'. duly
noticed meeting at which oral or written presentations Iegarding the development impact fee for
the City's eastern territories could be made, and
WHEREAS, after consideration of the evidence presented to it including the "Eastern
. Alas Development Impact Fees for Streets" ltudy the City Council ~ that certain
amendments to Ordinance No. 2251 are ne<:e"ClII'Y in order to assure that there are IUfficient
funds available to finance the tJanSpOrtation facilities -"'Y to laVe the eastern territories
by the l!evelopment impact fee, and
WHEREAS, the City Council determines, based on the evidence ,mUlted at the
meetin&, the City's General Plan, and the various reports and infonnation received by tbe City
Council in the ordinary course of its business, that the imposition of traffic impact fees on all
development in the eastern territories for which building permits have DOt been issued is
DeCf'....'Y in order to protect the public health, safety and welfare and in order to usure effective
implementation of the City's General Plan, and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the amount of the amended fees levied
by this Ordinance does not exceed the estimated cost of providing the transportation facilities,
and
WHEREAS, the City Council determines that it is appropriate to resolve the fees for
commercial land uses to reflect the fact that many of the trips associated with the commercial
land uses are in fact, trips associated with other land uses that incorporate an intermediate stop
at a commercial land use (passerby trips), and
WHEREAS, it is necessary to ensure the timely payment of the "DIF program support"
cost item, included in Table 2 "Capital Improvement projects - cost estimate summary" of the
financial and engineering study to adequately fund ongoing and future administration activities
and studies, and
WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes that reduction of trips from commercial land
uses may place an inordinate burden on commercial land uses where public facility assessments
Jlave been placed on the affected properties in anticipation of payment of transportation fees, and
as . RSUlt of said adjustment, the proposed fees are DOW lower than the Yalue of the
uses$ftY'"ts.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does ordain as
follows:
SECI'lON I:
Tbat the development impact fee lChedule let forth in Section I(c) of Ordinance No.
2251 is amended to read as follows:
Page 2
7:"-/9_
ATTACHMENT #20-3
Table 1
.......,
Fee applicable prior to January 1, 1995
DnelOpmenl Type TnDsportatlon Fee
Sm,le I'lIIIily D-'1uwI DweI\iD, $3,06O/DwdIiD, Unit
Sm;te I'lIIIily AUa.becl DweI\iD, $2.448/DwdIiD, Unit
Multi-l'lIIIily Dwellm, $1.I36/DwdIiDJ Unit
CommerdII $122.400/ar- Am
IadustriI1 $61.20010__ Am
1leIiaiouslDstil\ltiOD&l $12.240/0__ Am
Oolf Course $3.052/0ross Acre
Medical Center $198.9OO/01OlS Acre
Olympic TniniDa Center (OTe) $10.189/0__ Acre
Adjacent to O.T.e. $107.100/01OlS Acre
TABLE 1
Table 2
"""\
Fee applicable effective January I, 1995
Denlopment Type Transportation Fee
Smale Fllllily Detached DwelliDa $3.998IDwe11iDa Unit
SiDale Fllllily AttachecI Dwel1iDa $3.1981Dwe11iD, Unit
Multi-Fllllily DweI\iD, S2.399/DwdIiD, Unit
~lIWIrdal $99.950/0__ Am
IDdustriaI $19.960101'I* Am
1leIiaiouslDstil\ltioaa1 $15.992IOI'l* Acre
Golf Coune $3.198101'l* Am
Medical Ceater $259.870101'I* Am
Olympic TniDiD, c.ater (OTe) $13,313101'I* Acre
Mjaceot to O.T.e. $139.930101'I* Acre
TABLE 2
"""\
"7- zL/
-
Page 3 .
ATTACHMENT #20-3
ATTACHMENT #20~4
..
The City Council shall at least annually review the amount qf the fee. The City Council
may adjust the amount of the fee as necessary to reflect changes in the Engineering-News
Record Construction Index, the type, size, lec:ation or cost of the Transportation
Facilities to be financed by the fee, changes in land use designations in the City's
. General Plan, and upon other sound engineering, financing and planning information.
Adjustments to the above fees may be made by reso1ution amending the Master Fee
Schedule.
SECTION 2:
That the definition "Eastern Territories" as set forth in Section 2e of Ordinance 2251 is
amended to read as fonows:
"Eastern Territories" means that area of the City locetflll between
Interstate 80S on the west, the City sph~f-influence boundary on the
east, Bonita Road on the north and the alignment of the proposed
extension of East Orange Avenue on the south, as shown on the map
entitled "Developable Land Area (Map I)" of the financial and
engineenng study. The property known as Bonita Gateway located at the
northeast quadrant of Bonita Road and I-80S interseCtion is also included.
SECTION 3:
.
That the definition of "Financial and Engineering studies" as set forth in Section 2f of
Ordinance No. 225 I is amended to read as fonows:
"Financial and engineering studies": means the "Interim Eastern
Area Development Impact Fees for Streets" study prepared by
George T. Simpson and Willdan Associates dated November 1987,
the "Eastern Area Development Fees for Streets" study prepared
by Willdan Associates dated November 19, 1990, and the "Eastern
Development Impact Fees for Streets - 1993 Revision" study
prepared by City staff dated July 13, 1993, which are on file in the
Office of the City Clerk". .
SECTION 4:
That the list of facilities and programs set forth in Section 3(a) of the Ordinance No.
2251 is amended to read as follows:
The transportation facilities and programs to be fiDanced by the fee
established by this Ordinance are:
1.*
State Route 125 from San Miguel Road to Telegraph Canyon
Road.
.
2.* State Route 125 from Telegraph Canyon Road to Orange Avenue.
-r_7.J
Page 4
ATTACHMENT #20-4
ATTACHMENT #2 0-'5
3.
Telegraph Canyon Road from Pasco Del Rey to east of Pasco
Laderalnonh side.
-...
3a. Telegraph Canyon Road at I-80s interchangeIPhase D.
4... Telegraph Canyon Road - Phase I Rutgers Avenue to EastLake
Boundary.
S. .. Telegraph Canyon Road - Phase D Pasco Ladera to Apache Drive.
6. Telegraph Canon Road - Phase m Apache Drive to Rutgers
Avenue.
7. East H Street - 1-805 interchange modifications.
8... East H Street from EastLake Drive to SR-125.
9... Otay La1ces Road from Camino del Cerra Grande to Ridgeback
Road.
10. Otay La1ces Road from Telegraph Canyon Road to East Orange
Avenue.
11.
Bonita Road from Otay La1ces Road to Central Avenue.
~
12. Bonita Road from Central Avenue to San Miguel Road.
13. San Miguel Road from Bonita Road to SR-I25
14... East H Street from State Route 125 to San Miguel Road.
15. Proctor Valley Road (East H Street) from San Miguel Road to
Hunte Parkway.
16. Orange Avenue from Oleander Avenue to Sunbow Eastern
Boundary .
17. Palomar Street from Oleander Avenue to Sunbow Eastern
Boundary.
18. .. Telepaph Canyon Road from eastern boundary of J:..aT ..""' to
Hunte Parkway.
19... EastLake Parkway from Telegraph Canyon Road to EastLake High
School southern boundary.
20. Hunte Parkway from Proctor Valley Road to Telegraph Canyon
Road.
........
I- 22-
Page 5
ATTAr~M~NT 1?0-5
ATTACHMENT /12 0-6
'. 21. .. Hunte Parkway from Telegraph Canyon Road to Club House
Drive.
21a. Hunte Parkway from Club House Drive to East Orange Avenue.
22. East Orange Avenue from J;"dT .,lre Parkway to Hunte Parkway.
23. Pasco Ranchero Road to Telegraph Canyon Road to East Orange
Avenue.
24. East Orange A venue from eastern Sunbow BoundaIy to EastLake
Parkway.
25. East Orange Avenue - I-80S Interchange Modifications.
26. East Palomar Street from eastern Sunbow Boundary to Pasco
Ranchero.
27. East Palomar Street at J.80S Interchange.
28. Telegraph Canyon Road from Hunte Parkway to Wueste Road.
. 29. East Orange Avenue from Hunte Parkway to Olympic Training
Center.
30. Telegraph Canyon Road from SR-12S to EastLake Parkway.
31. EastLake Parkway from Fenton Street to Telegraph Canyon Road.
32. East H Street from J-80S to Hidden Vista Drive
33. Bonita Road at Otay Lakes Road Intersection.
34. Otay Lakes Road at Elmhurst Drive Intersection.
35. East H Street at Otay Lakes Road Inlef~tion.
36. Traffic Signal Interconneetion - Eastern Territories.
37. EastLake Parkway from 1=.,ttT .,b Hi&h Scbool Southern Boundary
to East Orange Avenue.
38. East H Street from Paseo Del Bey 10 TieIra del Bey.
. 39. Bonita Road from J-80S to Plaza Bonita Road.
"Project is now included in the interim pre-SRI2S transportation fIcility fee.
.*Project has been completed.
-r -,;;l~? PIle 6
.__a ......~_.._
ATTACHMENT #20-7
.
"""'"
SECTION 5: PAYMENT OF "DIF PROGRAM SUPPORT"
The .DIP Program Support. shall with no exceptions be paid in cash concurrently with
the development impact fee at a late equal to 5" of the total applicable fee.
SECTION 6: 'Ibis section shall become effective on January I, 1995. Commercialland
uses with street improvement assessments placed on the property shall be eligible for a credit
aaainst payment of applicable interim pre SR-I25 fees as requin::d by Ordinance 2579 or
IUbsequent amendments to said ordinance. Cledits J'elIli...... under this section shall not exceed
the lessor of: .
1. The interim Pre-SRI25 fee for the subject property, or
2. The amount that said assessment exceeds the TJansportation Development Impact
fee in effect at the time payment of said fees is required.
SECTION 7. EFFECTIVE DATE
This Ordinance shall take effect and be in full force 30 days after its ad 'on.
Presen~by ~
John P. Uppitt
Director of Public Works
C:'......U3
Bruce M. Boogaard
City Attorney
--..,
I- 07~
ATTACHMENT #20-7
Page 7
..
.
.
ATTACHMENT #3
COUNCIL AGENDA STATEMENT
Item
Meeting Date 4/2{1/93
ITEM TITLE: a) Public Hearing: Update of the Public Facilities Development
Impact Fee
b) Ordinance ~So1 Iddlng Clapter 3.50 to the ChuIa Vista
Municipal Code relating to a Development Impact Fee to pay for
various public flCilities within the City of CluIa Vista's General
Plan area boundary and superseding Ordinance No. 2432 and
Ordinance No. 2320 .
c) Resolution 17 {J r.3 approving the 1993 Update of the Public
Facilities Development Impact Fee
SUBMITTED BY: Special Projects Manager\i{j
REVIEWED BY: City Manager tf (4/5ths Vote: Yes_No.1L)
In August 1989, the City Council adopted the Public Facilities Development Impact Fee (pFDIF'),
whiclr was later amended by ordinance in January 1991.
The PFDIF was established to fund those public facilities and equipment required to support
future development within the City's general planning area.1 These public facility components
are the following:
.
.
.
.
.
Ovic Center Expansion
Police Deparunenl Expansion
Corporalion Yard Relocation
Libraries Expansion
FIR Suppression SysJaD Expansion
Oeolflllblc lDformalion SyIleID Tn,..lI'llion
MIiDfrIme CaDputer Uwade
Telephone SyIleID Upcnde
Rec:onIs MaDqcmeat SyIlaD IastaJlIlion
PFDIF ~tlrni"ierraliOD
.
.
.
.
.
.
Staff is presenting the latest update of the PFDIF, after completing a Culll~ehensive review of
the costs of the public facilities and PFDIF ordinance pro~ons.. Included with the Council
packet is a copy of the 1993 ~pdate Report.
RECOMMENDATION: That Council:
1. Adopt the OJdinance adding Clapter 3.50 to the Municipal Code for the PFDIF thereby
superseding Ordinance Nos. 2432 and 2320;
2.
Adopt the resolution approving the 1993 Update of the PFDIF, thereby a) maintaining the
current PFDIF of $2,150 per Equivalent Dwelling Unit for residential land uses and b)
I The OIay Ranch is DOt iDcluded In the c:umnt PI'IlIf. AD Impacl fee for the flCiUtia Deeded to _the OIay
Raoch wW be developed IhouId the ... _ to the Oty.
-r _"2 c::;-'
ATTACHMENT #3
ATTACHMENT #3-2
Page 2, Item
Meeting Date 4/20/93
~
decreasinl! the PFDIF' for CommerciallOffice and lndustrial1and uses by $1,290, from
$12,04O/gross acre to $10,7SO/gross acre and c) decreasing the PFDIF' for the Olympic
Training Center by $322, from $3,OI01gross acre to $2,68B/gross acre and d) setting the
PFDIF' for Special Land Use projects, such IS utilities, It $10,7SO!gross acre and e)
setting the PFDIF' for Special Purpose Projects It $6,4SO!gross acre; and
3. Direct staff to conduct updates of the Library Master Plan, Fire Station Master Plan and
Civic Center Master Plan when the development plans for Otay Ranch are more clearly
defmed and to prepare a PFDIF' Capital Improvement Project (CIP) program through the
year 2010.
BOARDS/COMMISSIONS RECOMMENDATION: Staff attended the December 1992
meeting of the Library Board of Trustees and the February and March 1993 meetings of the
Economic Development Commission to discuss the proposed update. The Commissions'
concerns and recommendations are discussed in the staff report. Attached to this repon are the
minutes of these meetings.
DISCUSSION:
A. A FEE DECREASE IS RECOMMENDED
-.."
1. The Caoital Needs Identified in the PFDIF are Generally Based on Citvwide
Service Standards and Master Plans.
To establish the fee for residential land uses, cost estimates are derived for all
projects included in the PFDIF. Once new development's share of these costs is
determined, that total cost is divided by the remaining number of equivalent
dwelling units (EDUs) to be built, IS determined by the City's General Plan or
specific project plans approved by Council. This procedure establishes the fee to
be charged per EDU. The fee for commercial{mdustrialland uses is set at S times
the fee for a residential dwelling unit, based upon the methodology established
within the report.
The cost estimates used in the Update Report reflect needs which, in many
instances, have been defmed in Council adopted service standards (e.g. .6 square
feet of library space per capita) and/or in master plans such IS those developed for
the Civic Center, Cotporation Yard and Fire Station network. Staff believes that
the Repon's cost figures are accurate for the projects IS thev are currentlv
envisioned in these standards and master plans.
Using cost figures based on these currently envisioned plans would result in an
increase in the fee for residential1and uses of $96, from $2,ISO per EDU to
""
7- c2&
ATTACHMENT #3-2
..
.
.
ATTACHMENT #3-3
Page 3, Item
Meeting Date 4/20/93
$2,246. The rate for c:ommcrdal/industrial uses would, however, decrease by
$810, from $12,040 to $11,230. This decrease reflects cbanges in the value of
underlying variables used to p""ll1te commercial/industrial aaeage into equivalent
dwelling units. Based on updatecJ data contained in the 1993 update, the
commercial/industrial fee is let It 5 times the fee for residential land uses, as
compared to the current factor of 5.6. Based upon the currently envisioned master
plans and corresponding cost estimates, the fee for the Olympic Training Center
would dt"r.1'f'.A~ by $202 for aimilar JaSOns.
While the cost estimates based on existing master plans would ftCluire a $96 fee
increase for residential land uses, staff is recommending that the fee for residential
land uses be maintained It the present level of $2,150. As discussed below, staff
believes that a further cost review of the civic center/puking expansion project is
warranted. Staff is also recommending that the fees associated with
commercialfmd,ustrialland uses and for the Olympic Training Center (OTC) be
further decreased beyond the amounts noted above. For C:O".llelCialfmdustrial
land uses, a decrease of $1,290/acre is recommended; for the OTC a decrease of
$3221acre is recommended.
2.
'fhe Civic CenterlParkinl! EXllansion Proiect Mav Chanl!e Because of Events
Anticillated in the Near Future.
In 1989, Council adopted the Civic Center Master Plan. This Plan details the
expansion in working and puking areas ftCluired to house the additional City staff
needed to serve new development The cost calculations for the expansion are
based on the Council-adopted Plan. Of the various projects included in the
PFDIF, the Civic Center Expansion Project is the most susceptible to change due
to external events:
a) the possible annexation of the Otay Ranch may ftCluire significant
modifications to the Plan depending on bow the demand for
additional employee space is to be met. One possible outcome
could entail expansion It the current lite in conjunction with
construCtion of a more centrally located annex building.
Conversely, all of the additional employees generated by the Otay
Ranch could possibly be accommodated It the current Civic Center
lite under a reconfigured plan. Such alternatives could generate
economies of scale and thereby reduce the cost per equivalent
dwelling unit
trip reduction plans, presently beina developed to reduce
automobile emissions, could impact the ratio of puking spaces per
employee that is currently envisioned in the .Plan.
b)
Given these contingencies, staff is recommending that the fee for the Civic Center
Expansion Project be retained It its current level to reflect possible cost reductions
ATTACHMENT #3-3
...,..-_ _? '7
ATTACHMENT #3-4
Page 4, Item
Meeting Date 4/20/93
........
stemming from such near term events. As shown in the table below . the
recommended fee adjustment will allow for appropriate adjustments to be made
to the other facility components and will keep the fee for residential units at the
present level:
BREAKDOWN OF IlESIDENTlAL FEE BY COMPONENT
ComDOnent .f._at
Civic CeDteI' Expaasion SS27/EDU
Police DeplnmeDt ExpllllSiOllIlld Improvements S23S/EDU
Carporatlon Yard Re1oc:atlon SSIS/EDU
Library System Expansion $S44/EDU
FIR Suppression SystaD Expaasion S141/EDU
Geographic JoI'onoatlon System Development ~9/EDU
Mainframe Computer SyslCID Expansion S23/EDU
Telephone System Upgade S32/EDU
Rec:ords Management SyslCID Development SS/EDU
DIF Administratlon (4.OS%) S79/EDU
TOTAL S2.1S0
-.,
It is funher recommended thai the fee for commerciaVoffice and industrial acreage
be decreased correspondingly by $1,290/acre and the fee for the Olympic Training
Center be decreased by $3221acre:
l..IndUse fa
Reslllent;.' S2.1S01dwel1iD& unit
C --c1Il.Olf"ace S1O,75Cl/1ae
IDdustriaI S1O,75Cl/1ae
Olympic 1'nInlna CeDter S2.6B8/Il:re
special LInd UK S10.75Cl/1ae
SpeclaI P\upose Project S6.45Cl/1ae
Public P\upose Exempt
Noa-p1lflt C""""..nlty Exempt
P\IrpoIe FacUity
........
..:r - c;;2 e
ATTACHMENT #3-4
ATTACHMENT #3-5
..
Pille 5, Item
MeeCin. Date 4/20/93
A discussion of the proposed fees for Special LInd Use and Special Purpose projects is
found in Section D of this report.
The next update of the Public Facilities Impact Fee is lCbeduled for 1995, which should
provide sufficient time for staff to review the Civic Center Master Plan. If, at that time.
it is detennined that any adjustments to the current Master Plan will DOt sipUficandy
affect unit costs. the corresponding fee will Deed to be adjusted apWII'ds. Based upon
cmrent cost calculations and estimates of the renllining EDUs as derived from the
Planning Department's development forecasts, such an adjustment would result in a 1995
fee increase for the Civic Center component of $107, based 011 1993 doUars.
It is important to briefly note that the needs for other capital projects cunendy included
within the PfDIF are not as likely to be impacted by events such as the possible
annexation of the Otay Ranch area. For example, while the annexation would increase
the number of rue stations needed. it would not impact the number of fire stations needed
to serve the non-Otay Ranch area. (The location of these stations could, however. be
impacted and will be reviewed during the F"ue Station Master Plan Update.)
.
It is important to emphasize that staff does have concerns about adjusting the Civic
Center Expansion component of the fee on the basis of DOtential impacts rather than hard
facts. Staff's meetings with developers and the Construction Industry Federation have
yielded general agreement that the costs for the projects as cmrendy envisioned are
accurate and reasonable. Moreover. there is no assurance that the unit costs for the Civic
Center Expansion Project, as envisioned in the current Master Plan, will be reduced by
these coming events. As such. there is a reasonable possibility that at the next scheduled
fee update (1995), staff could be proposing a $107 fee increase for the Civic Center
Expansion component alone, in addition to possible increases for other components
necessary to maintain pace with construction costs (ERe Index) or general inflation.
There is. of course, no way of knowing how the construction industry will be faring two
years hence. Staff is conccmed that if smaller increases are delayed DOW, the cumulative
cost increases spread over a decreasin. number of dwelling units could become too large
to enact in future years. Failure to enact the appropriate impact fee could, in turn, create
significant fund shortages. prohibiting the CODStructiOll of De etfed flCilities UDless City
subsidies are provided.
Given these concerns, staff is still JeC:ommending that the fee co~t for the Civic
Center Expansion Project be adjusted downward, until project needs can be reassessed.
Once that reassessment occurs, however, it is imperative that fees be enacted which will
cover the actual costs of the project.
.
ATTACHMENT #3-5
~ ..:/ 9
ATTACHMENT #3-6
Page 6, Item
Meeting Date 4/20/93 """'"
B. THE CITY SHARE OF COSTS
1. Preexistinl! deficiencies are the minciDal reason for a City share in the cost of
facilities and ~uimnenl
There are three pneral factors which rault in a City Ibare of facility or
equipment costs. These are:
. A meexiSjnI! City deficiency which must be corrected. Gen<<a1ly, the size
and/or number of facilities needed is based on a citywide IC'lVice standard.
For example, the need for libraries is based on a citywide standard of .6
square feet per capita. If the standard is higher rhan what the City attained
prior to development, then the City is obligated under the Government
Code to correct the "defICiency" in its preexisting level of service. Since
the City was below the .6 square feet per-capita standard in the baseline
year, the City must construct sufficient new library square footage to bring
its preexisting level up to the current standard. For libraries, the
preexisting deficiency will be corrected when the new Montgomery-Otay
library is buill
~
Preexisting deficiencies account for more than half of tile City's share of
costs.
. A new tvDe of facility or ~uiDment which will ioin~ benefit both the
nreexistinl! City and new develomnent. An example of a joint benefit
project is the mobile digital terminals planned for use in police patrol cars.
This equipment will enhance patrol services in both the new and old areas
of the City. As such, costs for this project are shared on the basis of
proportionate benefit rates in the proportion of new to old EDUs served.
Another example of a joint benef"u project is the FOJflPbic information
system (GIS). On one level, the inaasing volume of data gencnted by
growth demands that the City develop more efficient planning and
engineering processes. Conversely, even if growth did not occur, cities are
availing themselves of the new technology provided by GIS. As such, the
GIS project has a joint CitylDIF share, as detailed in the Council adopted
Capital Improvement Project budget
. EXDansion of a meexistin2 niece of ~uinmenl An example of this type
. of project is the replacement of the City's mainframe computer. This new
system was needed due to technological. obsolescence of the old
equipmenl New development's share of the replacement cost is limited .-,.
to the cost of die additional memory, storage space. and associated items
need-ed to serve the growing City.
I- .3 CJ
ATTACHMENT #3-6
ATTACHMENT #3-7
Page 7, Item
Meetlna Date 4/10/93
.
2. .t,~ost of the City share of costs will be funded bv non-General Fund sources.
New development's share of project costs includtd in the PFDIF totals
$50,751,700. The City cost share for these projects totals $21,281,317. The Table
below shows the fund 1Ourc:e5 for the City share. Imponant points to note about
the table are:
. Only a small portion of the funds identified are from the City's General
Fund. The $1,386,800 in General Fund Capital Outlay was principally
used to finance the City share for the police bllndl'lg J...~lOdel.
. The City share of funding for the Montgomery-Otay library totals
$9,863,742. A significant portion of the City share ($6,748,000) will be
financed by a State grant
. Approximately 46% of the total City share is for the Montgomery!Otay
library ($9,864,000). An 8dditional 8% percent or $1,772,000 represents
Transit's share of the new COJpOration yard.
.
Several projects with significant City shares have already been
appropriated and expended. They include approximately $1,207,000 for
the replacement of the City's mainframe computer and installation of the
new library automation system, and $1,053,000 for the City's share of the
Police station remodel.
.
. The City's share of the GIS project will come solely from non-General
Fund sources. The City's share of the Corporation Yard, to correct
preexisting deficiencies, will be funded from the pl'OC'eeds of the sale of
the existing site.
. Lastly, preexisting deficiencies in Civic Center working and parking space
add $2,400,000 to. the City share. The proposed review of the Civic
Center Master Plan could reduce the size of ~e City share in conjunction
with producing a lower DIF share per EDU.
.
ATTACHMENT #3-7
::r -3/
ATTACHMENT #3-8
Page 8, Item
Meetina Date 4120/93
.......
1. SUIIe 0nIn (MOIIl&omery,(llay S 6,748,000
IJbraIy)
2. (DBG 2,731,200
3. SCOOT Capital Outlay Fund 1.771.500
4. . 0eDml PwIlI ClpltaI Ouday 1,386,BOO
S. . RCT 1,2S7.ooo
6. SpeciaJ Sewer FUDCII 699,600
7. Rev_ SbariD& 112,900
8. California Swe IJbraIy Act 94,200
CapItal Project Fund
9. Special Cllpltal Outlay Fund 42,900
10. Gas Tax 40.500
11. RedevelopmeDl Agency 30,000
SUBTOTAL S 14.914,600
12. City PFDIF nimbursemen1/aedl1S 2,190,700'
13. Sale of exisliDg City land asselS 1,327,700
SUBTOTAL S 18,433,000
14. CuJrmtly UDideDlIfied 2,848,317
TOTAL S 21,281,317
I Cootains fwIds from ale of w:ess _ capacity,
purcbased by City in 1962, to Olber dues.
. Tbese fwIds are CWTaItly allocated in City'. C1P
budgeL
, May include ~l for City lIlIvlllCel of
PFDIF costs (e.a. for lbe police builrl;"ll taDOdel) lDd
credilS for in.JdDd City CODlributions.
.........
C. PFDIF REPORT IUGHUGlITS
1. The loint City-School District Librarv at Eastlak~educed the ~IF bv ~
As part of the origina11y planned library system, a separate facility was to be
constnlc~ in East1ake. This facility bas been replaced by a joint City-School
District library which will serve the community on In experimental basis. In
addition to providing operating cost livings. the joint use facility bas eliminated
the capital costs of constructing a separate library. Without tills eoP.bcmative
effort, fees per EDU would bve been $127I11&ber.
2. )he Police B\tildinl! RemodellExDlnsion Has Been Comol_
.......
The remodel of the police building was completed in 1992. at a cost $3,510.769.
70% of the project cost ($2.457,538) was the PFDIF share. The limi~
availability of funds in the police component of the PFDIF requimS that the
.:r - 3d
ATTACHMENT #3-8
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT #3-9
Page 9, Item
Meeting Date 4/1.0/93
project be financed by intt:rest bearing loans from other City funds.
Recommended changes to the IttUCtlR of the PFDIF will help ameliorate
cashflow problems for aome PFDIF projects. 1bese changes ue discussed in
more detail in Section D of the report.
3. A Sixth Citv FIJ'e Station is beinl ODened and a New FIJ'e Traininl Tower has
been Constructed.
Eastlake Development Company is Idvancina approximately $227,000 in impact
fees to provide a temporary, modular fire station buildi"g and truckpon to serve
the Eastlake I and surroundina areas. When plans for the Otay Ranch ue more
clearly dermed. staff will detennine an optimum site for the station within the
context of an overall network. The developer is also advancing approximately
$312,000 in fees to purchase a fire pumper and related equipment for the station.
This equipment will be transferred to the permanent station site.
McMillin Communities has completed construction of a new fire training facility
in the Rancho del Rey development This facility is state-of-the-art in both
function and design. A fire training classroom is planned as an adjunct to the
futlR rlJ'e station to be built in the Rancho del Rey development
A new radio relay station is plaMed for construction in the next year which will
improve police and rue communications throughout the eastern area of the City.
D. PFDIF ORDINANCE REVISIONS
1. Recommended Chanles and Additions
It is recommended that the two existing ordinances covering the PFDIF be
superseded by a new ordinance which adds a new chapter to the City Code
thereby incorporating the PFDIF. This change was recommended by the City
Attorney:
A major ordinance change c:oncems the proposed merging of the various fee
components into a single fund, similar in concept to the ament 1iansportation
Development Impact Fee.
Under the ament ordinance, IepII'BIe fee ~ts ue collected for the
different facilities and placed in IepII'BIe accounts. Funds from one component
cannot be used to finance projects in another ......nponent, repnDess of the need
for or timing of the various projects. As such. the PFDIF share of the police
building remodel could only be financed by interest bearing loans from other City
funds, irrespective of the overall availability of Pi"DIF funds.
Under the proposed new ordinance, fees collected after the effective date of the
new ordinance would be consolid,tPil in a single fund rather than separate facility
-.- 22
_ATTACHMENT #3-9
ATTACHMENT #3-10
Page 10, Item
Meeting Date 4/1.0193
-..
,
ICcounts, which would help to ICCOIIIIIIOdate the financing of PFDIF' projects
without the necessity of leeking loans from other City funds. Moreover,
consolidation, by enabling the City to ICCCIerate developer credits, would improve
the City's ability to negotiate with developers for up-front financing or
constnlCtion of projects. Fees collected prior to the effective date of the ordinance
would ~main in separate facility 1CCOUDts, per the _,".lICndation of the City
Attorney.
Lastly, it is important to emphasize that the additional flexibility obWned by
consolidating the fee components into a single fund will principally help the
financing of smaller projects. Very large scale projects, IUCh as the corporation
yard ~location or the civic center expansion, will continue to require non-PFDIF'
financing mechanisms, such as developers advances, loans from other City funds,
or developer coalitions, if they ~ to be built in a timely manner.
The benefits of providing ICCCSS to all PFDIF' funds as project needs dictate w~
discussed with developers and the CIF at the public meeting. No objections w~
raised to such an approach.
Other significant amendments to the ordinance ~ outlined below:
-...
. Changing the calculation of fees from the building permit application stage
to the building permit issuance stage, since th~ can be a long lag time
from application to issuance.
. Allowing developers who construct or fund a portion of or all of one of
the PFDIF' facilities to be paid in~ from the PFDIF' on any portion of
the cost that exceeds the Developer's fair sh~ (amount owed).
. Changing the developer credit calculation from an EDU or gross ~ basis
to an ~gate dollar basis so that a developer will receive a dollar-for-
dollar credit against the dollar amount of. the deft.....d fee, to lCCOunt for
fu~ ~sions to the dollar amount of the fee. (Deferrals may be allowed
if the developer constnJCtS all or a portion of a public facility).
. Better defining who is subject to payment of the PFDIF' (see below for
further explanation) and Idding Idditionalland lISC categories.
.
Memorializing the current practice of allowing for occasional loans of City
funds to pay for PFDIF' projects and the repaying of these . loans with
in~SL
-.,
. Modifying the definition of colUwunity purpose facilities.
A section was added to the ordinance to specify which types of development
projects would be subject to the PFDIF'. The current ordinance states that
T-.3 9' ATTACHMENT #3-10
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT #3-11
Page 11, Item
Meeting Date 4120/93
development projects. as defined by the State Government Code. are subject to the
PFDIF. However. as defined by the State Code. a development project could be
something as small as a room Iddition OIl a house or any kind of alteration to a
building. While these types of projects have m1 been charged a PFDIF by the
City. it was felt that the ordinance should ~nect this practice and list other types
of projects that would be exempt and clearly state which would be eligible.
Additional land use categories have been I&kd for those projects that do not fall
into the current categories of "Residential". "Conunetcia1/OfflCC". and "Industrial".
The category of "Special Land Use" bas been Idded to lCCOunt for any non-
~idential. non-commerciallofficelindustrial project. such as the Olympic Training
Center. hospitals and utilities. The category of "Special Purpose" bas been added
to define any .for-mofit community purpose facility. such as a for-profit day ~
center.
As detailed in the ordinance. commercial. industrial or ~ntial projects on
cumntly developed sites are subject to the fee ONLY if the project ~sults in a
net inc~ase in EDUs. For example. a project converting an existing single family
dwelling unit into a multi-family complex would ~ the number of EDUs
and be subject to the fee; conversely. an expansion of a commercial business
which occurred on its cumnt site or on a neighboring. developed commercial site
would not ~sult in an in~ in EDUs and hence would NOT be subject to the
fee.
The appropriate fee for Special Land Use projects shall be that of
commercial/office/industrial projects. or $IO.7501acre. However. the fee for
Special Purpose projects. such as .for-mofi~ day care centers. shall be $6,4SO/acre.
At ~sent, for-profit day ~ centers are assessed a PFDIF based on a certain
number of auto trips/child, which ~ts in a factor of $179.17/child (non-profit
centers are exempt from the fee). Using the methodology established within the
PFDIF ~ the fee of $6,4501acre is IeCOIIII1lCDded for this type of project and
all other Special Purpose projects. The proposed fee should ~su1t in a significant
fee =uction for the centers.
This ordinance will take effect 60 days from its ICCOIld ~g.
2.
pment Exemntions to the PFD1fJIave '-" _ined
Under the current ordinance. Public Purpose Projects. IUCh as those undertaken by
public agencies. and non-profit COlillDunity pUIpOse facilities, such as churches.
non-profit day care centers, non-profit private lChools. Vlrious social service
agencies and all public schools are exempt. These exemptions have been ~ed
in the proposed ordinance. given the unlikelihood of a challenge.
This ~tention of the exemptiOns on churches. however. is not an endorsement of
this policy by the City AttorneY. but is ~ly a ~on of current ordinance
-r _ -:?S-
~UArIlMrN"L .':\_11
ATTACHMENT #3-12
Page U, Item
Meeting Date 4110/93 -...,
language and cmrent practice. (A separate letter from the City Auomey dealing
with this issue will be forthcoming.)
E. PFDIF UPDATE PROCESS
Shonly after the PFDIF was established in 1989. the firm ofW'illdan AI....,.;.~s. Inc. was
Jetained to refme the in-house study which had been used to establish the initial fee. The
firm was tetained to verify population elata. JeView City stl'''''.~ for public facilities.
refme facility cost estimates and JeView and refine the methodology used to apportion
facility costs. Willdan's analysis fonned the basis for the 1991 fee ~ate, W'illdan was
used for this latest update to compile the data prepared by staff. and provide consultation.
Future updates of the PFDIF will be prepared by staff. with minimal. if any. support of
a consultanL
1. Inout from Maior DevelooerslConstruction Industrv Federal (CIF) Inout
Staff invited the major developers in Olula Vista and thll OF to a meeting on.
1anuary 27. 1993 to obtain preliminary feedback on a draft PFDIF reporL A
follow-up meeting was held with a developer representative to address various
issues in more detail, Jesulting in cost adjustments for several projects. -...,
While the developers and OF tepresentative were in general conCurrence with the
underlying analyses and the justification for the proposed fee changes. most
expressed concern about the timing of any fee increase during an economic
downturn. The OF tepresentative stated that holding off on any fee increase for
one year was supportable. Concern was also expressed about the impact of the
aggJegate increase in fees on the development community. They requested that:
. Council consider any increases in the PFDIF within the context of other
fee changes being contemplated by the City (particu1arly. the new impact
fee which will be proposed f~ construction of SR-I25); and
. Council consider the alternatives of deferring or phasin.-in any propOsed
fee increase.
As JeCOnunended by staff. the PFDIF for tesidentialland uses will temain at the
present level; the fee for collUlllllCiallinustrial land uses and for the Olympic
Training Center will be decreased.
2. }nout from City Commissions
Staff attended the February and March meetinp of the Economic Development -""'\
Commission (EDC) to receive input on the preliminary draft report. The EDC
echoed the sentiments of the development community in also expressing concern
Jegarding the timing of any fee increase during a JeCession. Another area of
concern was the general impact of fees on the affordability of housing. Minutes
1- 3iP
ATTACHMENT #3-12
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT #3-13
Page 13, Item
Meetina Date.41t0I93
from these meetings as well as ICIfi"s follow-up memo Iddressing the issues
raised are attached.
Staff also made III informational presentation on the Ubrary component of the
PFDIF to the Ubrary Board of Trustees at its December 1992 meeting. The
Board IIId staff agreed that III update of the Ubrary Master Plan was needed once
plans for the Otay Ranch project area were more cleuiy defined. The Board also
understood that the Ubrary component of the DIF took into lCCOunt the reduced
cost for the joint East1aIte Hip ScbooJ/City library pilot program and that the cost
would increase should a decision be made to have a aeparate City library in
Eastlake in the future.
In addition to holding meetings with the major developers and making
presentations to the EDC and Ubrary Board of Trustees, notices were mailed to
all affected businesses and individuals with building plans or parcel maps in
process or building pennit applications on file.
F.
UPDATING MASTER PLANS
Should the Otay Ranch annex to the City, the optimum location of both Otay Ranch IIId
non-Otay Ranch facilities need to be considered as a whole. For example, until
development plans for the Otay RIJIch are clarified, the most optimal fire station network
cannot be detennined. Pending such data, the new, sixth City fire station is being
operated from a temporary facility. Once plans for the.Otay Ranch are detennined, a
permanent site for the new fire station wiD be decided.
Similarly, the Ubrary Master Plan needs to be reassessed from a joint Otay Ranch/non-
Otay RIJIch perspective. An updated Ubrary Master Plan should (1) refine the planned
library network to best serve the entire City; (2) establiSh tarBet dates for the construction
and operation of new facilities; and (3) identify intermediate funding needs and sources
in order to mitigate possible cash Oow shortfalls in the PFDIF fund.
Additionally, it is recommended thatstlft'prepare a CIP budget throup the year 2010 for
all PFDIF projects. .
FISCAL IMPACf: There wiD be no net increase in the PFDIF if Council accepts the staff
recommendation. The fee for residential land uses wiD remain at S2.1501EDU; the fee for
commerciaVofticelindustrialland uses wiD decrease from $12,04OIacre to $10,7501acre; the fee
for the OTC wiD decrease from 3,olOlacre to S2.6881acre. A fee for Special Land Use projects
shall be set at $10,7501acre. A fee for Special Purpose projects, auch as for-brofit day care
centers, would be set at $6,4SO/acre. As previously discussed in Section D, the proposed fee for
for-profit day care centers should result in a signiflClJlt fee reduction for these centers.
WfC~.93
-r . ? "/.._
......"'I......r-...... .n!"IL_1 ~
ATTACHMENT 4-A
.........,
!!BLBGRAPII CUfYOII SBWBR
On January 23, 1990, the city entered into an agreement with
Eastlake Development company whereby Eastlake would fund the
preparation of an Improvement and Financing Plan for sewerage
improvements within the Telegraph canyon sewer basin (Figure 1) in
return for permission to pump flows into the basin on a temporary
basis. The plan would allocate cost responsibility for providing
trunk sewer improvements and ensure that such improvements would be
constructed in a timely manner so as not to exceed the capacity of
the trunk sewer at any point in time.
In response to the City's request for proposal to provide
engineering services, Willdan Associates was selected to prepare
the basin plan. The work to be accomplished by the consultant
included the preparation of a report which:
1. Estimates current and ultimate sewage flows in the Telegraph
Canyon sewer basin assuming D2 pumped flows.
2.
Recommends the type, size, location, and approximate order of
construction of necessary sewer improvements.
~
3. Establishes a work program for future projects with estimated
costs for the construction of required facilities for the
transportation of all sewage flows which will use the
Telegraph Canyon sewer.
4. Establishes fees or a funding mechanism to finance these
improvements and flow monitoring process.
Only future development east of 805 was identified for flow
analysis and fee purposes because the basin is virtually at
buildout west of Interstate 805. Those few developable parcels
remaining west of Interstate 805 have previously been included in
capacity calculations and pipe sizes downstream of these locations.
-.,
ATTACHMENT 4-A
I-.3f?
I
,
,
e
.
.
ATTACHMENT #4-8
,^. ,.
VJ':: ..
t.UW~
~ ~.
<d
D il
o c!
r/') .
r/'):!f:
<i~
li!~
:z III ~
~Ii
~!l~
..J..
;:! "
:> u"
~
.
I
~ II ~ ~
~5!iiil~
/
'.j
:z
Vl
<I:
c:l
0::
W
~
W
Vl
:z
o
~
:z
<I:
,..)
:x:
Cl..
<I:
0::
<.;)
W
...J
W
~
I
l
~
~-z- ~
i
-
,,:) -
.::
"
ATTACHMENT #4-8
T-.s '7
ATTACHMENT #5-A
ADDENDUM TO
"~TERIM STATE ROUTE 125 FACILITY FEASmILITY STlJDY" REPORT
(Dated May, 1993)
........,
Financing Costs
Adjusted Program Cost (1/95)
S27,953,000
(SI3,343,000)
$14,610,000
52,504,000
517,114,000
Current Program Cost (Table 4.4.4)
Delete Segments 6 & 7
Subtotal
Current Area of Benefit (AOB) (Table 8.2)
Est. Pennits issued prior to li94
Est permits 1/94-1/95
Remaining Area of Benefit
22,831 EDUs
(460)
(1,500)
20,871 EDUs
Proposed Fee
$17114000
20,871 EDU = S820
F~.pplit"JIhleeff'ediveJanu.ry 1. 1~
""""
Development Type
Single Family Detached Dwelling
Single Family Attached Dwelling
Multi-Family Dwelling
Commercial
Industrial
Religious Institutional
Transportation Fee
S820Dwelling Unit
S656lDwelling Unit
S492lDwelling Unit
S20,5oo/Gross Acre
SI6,400/Gross Acre
SI5,9921Gross Acre
""""
ATTACHMENT #5-A
1- ~tt'
ATTACHMENT #58-1
.
ORDINANCE NO. 2519
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF CHULA VISTA, CAUFORNIA,
ESTABUSHING AN INTERIM PRE-SRI2S DEVELOPMENT IMPACT
FEE TO PAY FOR TRANSPORT AnON FACILmES IN TH!! CITY'S
EASTERN TERRITORIES
WHEREAS, the City's General Plan Land Use and Circulation Elements require that adequate,
are transportation facilities be available to accommodate the increased traffic created by new
development, and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that potential delays in the construction of State
Route (SR) 125 by CALTRANS or others will adversely impact the City's ability to accommodate said
increased traffic, and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that new development within the Eastern
Territories will create adverse impacts on the City's transportation system which must be mitigated by
the financing and construction of certain transportation facilities identified in this Ordinance, and
. WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that a reasonable means of financing the
~sportation facilities is to levy a fee on all development in the Eastern Territories of the City, and
WHEREAS, the fee has been justified by the financial and engineering study entitled "Interim
State Route 125 Facility Feasibility Study" dated May 1993, and prepared by Howard Needles Tammen
" Ber&endoff ("Study").
WHEREAS, the financial and engineering study and the City's General Plan show that the
transportation network will be adversely impacted by new development within the Eastern Territories
unless new transportation facilities are added to accommodate the new development, and
WHEREAS, the financial and eniineering study and the City's General Plan establish that the
transportation facilities necessitated by development in the Eastern Territories comprises an integrated
lletWork, and
WHEREAS, developers of land within the Eastern Territories should be required to mitipte the
burden created by development through the construction of transportation facilities within the boundaries
of the development, the construction of those transportation facilities outside the boundaries of the
development which are needed to provide service to the development in accordance with City standards,
and the payment of a fee to finance the development's ponion of the total cost of the transportation
. IIetWOrk, and
Page I
ATTACHMENT #58-1
f- -'/ /
ATTACHMENT #5B-2
WHEREAS, all development within ,the Eastern Territories contribute to the cumulative burden -....
on the transportation network in direct relationship to the amount of traffic originated by or destined
for the development, and
WHEREAS, the amount of traffic generated has been determi~ based upon average daily trips
for various land areas based upon studies conducted by SANDAG (commercial trips being modified to
eliminate passerby trips) and verified by the financial and engineering study prepared for the purposes
of this fee, and
WHEREAS, the SANDAG traffic generation determinations have been used by numerous public
lIencies in San Diego County for various purposes, including the preparation of General Plan
Circulation Elements, the justification of traffic impact fees, and transportation planning, and have been
determined to be a reliable and accepted means of allocating the burden on a transportation network to
development to be serviced by the network, and
WHEREAS, on July 27, 1993, the City Council held a duly noticed meeting at which oral or
written presentations could be made, and
WHEREAS, the City Council determined based upon the evidence presented at the meeting, the
City's General Plan and the various reports and other information received by,the City Council in the
course of its business that imposition of the Interim pre-SR-12S impact fee on all development in the
Eastern Territories for which building permits have not yet been issued is necessary in order to protect
the public safety and welfare and in order to ensure effective implementation of the City's General Plan, ~
and
WHEREAS, the City Council has determined that the amQunt of the fee levied by this Ordinance
does not exceed the estimated cost of providing the transportation facilities.
NOW, THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Chula Vista does ordain as follows:
SECTION 1:
Establishment of Fee.
(a) An interim pre-SR-12S development impact fee in the amounts set forth in subsection (d)
is hereby established to pay for transportation improvements and facilities within the
, Eastern Territories of the City. The fee shall be paid before the issuance of building
permits for each development project within the Eastern Territories of the City. The fees
shall ~ expended only for the purposes set forth in this ordinance. The Director of
Finance is authorized to establish various accounts within the fund for the various
improvements and facilities identified in this ordinance and to periodically make
expenditures from the fund for the purposes set forth herein in accordance with the
facilities phasing plan or capital improvement plan adopted by the City Council. The
City Council finds that collection of the fees established by this ordinance at the time of
the building permit is necessary to ensure that funds will be available for the construction
-....
Page 2
ATTACHMENT #5B-2
7- // ~
ATTACHMENT #58-3
~'e
(b)
(c)
of facilities concurrent with the need for those facilities and to ensure certainty in the
capital facilities budgeting for the Eastern Territories.
Said fee shall be in effect commencing January I, 1995.
The fee established by this section is in addition to the requirements imposed by other
City laws, policies or regulations relating to the construction or the financing of the
construction of public improvements within subdivisions or developments.
(d)
The fee for each development shall be calculated at the time or. building permit
application based upon the following schedule:
pevel(1)ment 1):pe Tnn!$POrtation Fee
Single Family 5820/Dwel1ing Unit
Detached Dwel1ing
Single Family 56S6IDwelling Unit
Attached Dwelling
Multi-Family S492/Dwel1ing Unit
. Dwel1ing
Commercial 520,SOO/Oross Acre
Industrial 516,400/0ro55 Acre
The City Council shall annually review the amount of the fee. The City Council
may adjust the amount of the fee as necessary to reflect changes in the
Engineering-News Record Construction Index, the type, size, location or cost of
the Transportation Facilities to be financed by the fee, changes in land use
designations in the City's Oeneral Plan, and upon other sound engineering,
financing and planning information. Adjustments to the above fee may be made
by resolution amending the Master Fee Schedule.
(e) The fees collected shall be used by the City for the following purposes as
determined by the City Council:
1. To pay for the construction of facilities by the City, or to reimburse the
City for facilities installed by the City with funds from other sources as
such facility may be modified, deleted, amended or Idded from time to
time by the Council in order to implement the pre-SR-I2S strate&y as
defined in the Study.
.
Pa&e 3
ATTACHMENT #58-3
7_ .i/:?
ATTACHMENT #5B-4
2.
To reimburse developers who have been required by Section 4(a) of this
ordinance to install improvements that are street facilities and are listed in
Section 3.
-...
3. To reimburse developers who have been permitted to install improvements
JNrsuant to Section 4(b) of this ordinance.
4. To administer and update the fee program including retaining consultants
to perform engineering of rmancing studies.
SECTION 2: pefinitions.
For the purposes of this ordinance, the following words or phrases shall be construed as
defined in this Section, unless from the context it appears that a different meaning is
intended.
(a) "Building Permit" means a permit r~uired by and issued pursuant to the Uniform
Building Code as adopted by reference by this City.
(b) "Developer" means the owner or developer of a development.
(c). "Development Permit" means any discretionary permit, entitlement or approval
for a development project issued under any zoning or subdivision ordinance of the ........,
City.
(d) "Development Project" or "Development" means any activity described in Section
65927 and 65928 of the State Government Code.
(e) "Eastern Territories" means that area of the City located between Interstate 805
on the west, the City sphere of influence boundary on the east, Bonita Road on
the north, and the alignment of the proposed extension of East Orange Avenue
on the south, as shown on the Chula Vista General Plan. The property known
as Bonita Gateway located at the northeast quadrant of Bonita Road and I-80S
intersection is also included. For the purposes of this fee, Eastern Territories
shall be further restricted to exclude the following projects:
Eastlake Trails
Eastlake Vistas
Eastlake Woods
Eastlake Business Park II
Bonita Meadows
Phases of Salt Creek Ranch exceeding 1043 Equivalent Dwelling Units
Phases of San Miguel Ranch exceeding 1350 Equivalent Dwelling Units
........,
Page 4
I- /./~
ATTACHMENT #5B-4
'.
ATTACHMENT #5B-5
(f)
-Financial and engineering study.: means the -Interim State Route 125 Facility
Feasibility Study. dated May, 1993, and on file in the Office of the City Clerk.
SECTION 3:
Tran~rtation Pacilitie! to be Financed by the Fee.
(a) The transportation facilities to be financed by the feie established by this ordinance
are:
Sc..- 1 ~ Road (&ollila Road 10 SR-I2S)
SqmcnI 2 Bonila Road (S_ Road To San Mi.....1 Road)
SqmcnI3 San MipcI Road (BoniIa Road 10 PIoclor Valley Road)
SqmcnI4 PIoclor Valley Road (San Micucl Road 10 SR-l2S oorridor)
ScpenlS SR-I2S Corridor (The SR.I2S corridor is dle ri&hI~r.WlY _rvod Ihrouah l!ulIake and Salt Creek 1)
(b) The City Council may modify or amend the list of projects in order to maintain
compliance with the Circulation Element of the City's General Plan. The City
Council may also modify the list of projects funded by this program to adjust to
changes in projected growth patterns, or changes in traffic circulation needs
providing that the City Council finds, at a public hearing, that the collected fees
. will be used to benefit overall transportation in the City of Chula Vista.
.
SECTION 4:
Develo,per Construction of TransDOrtation Facilities.
(a) Whenever a developer of a development project would be required by application
of City law or policy, as a condition of approval of a development permit to
construct or finance the construction of a portion of a transportation facility
identified in Section 3 of this ordinance, the City Council may impose an
additional requirement that the development install the improvements with
supplemental size, length or capacity in order to ensure efficient and timely
construction of the transportation facilities network. If such a requirement is
imposed, the City Council shall, in its discretion, enter into a reimbursement
8&reement with the developer, or give a credit against the fee otherwise levied by
this ordinance on the development project.
(b) A developer may request authorization from the City Council to construct one or
more of the facilities listed in Section 3. The request shall be made in writing to
the City Council and shall contain the following informational conditions:
1. Detailed description of the project with a preliminary cost estimate.
2.
Requirements of developer:
Pa&e S .
f-~~
ATTAHMENT #5B-5
ATTACHMENT #58-6
preparation of plans and specifications for approval by the City; ~
secure and dedicate any right-of-way required for the project;
secure all required permits, environmental clearances necessary for
construction of the project;
provision of performance bonds;
payment of all Ci'1 fees and costs.
3. The City will not be responsible for any of the costs. of constructing the
project. The developer shall advance all ~"'''Y funds to construct the
project.
SBCTlON S: This ordinance ~a11 take effect and be in full force on the thirtieth day
from and after its adoption.
Presented by
'IX
Bruce M. Boogaard, ty ttomey
John Lippitt, Director of
Public Works
-.
WK: ,,_..--.an."
~
Plae 6
f-~~
ATTACHMENT #58-6
.
.
.
ATTACHMENT 6-A
orBLllGRAPB CUYOJl1 DRA:IDGIl
On June 6, 1990, willdan Associates prepared a report entitled
"TELEGRAPH CANYON DRAINAGE PLAN". The report established the
boundaries of the Telegraph Canyon Drainage Improvement District,
the extent of the additional drainage facilities needed to
accommodate new development in the district and a proposed
allocation of fees to pay for the drainage facilities. The "Area
of Benefit" of the drainage plan included all those full and
partial undeveloped parcels that lie within the drainage basin
boundary.
On August 7, 1990, the City council adopted Ordinance No. 2384
which established a drainage fee of $3,922 per gross benefit
acreage of benefitted land. The fee is required to be paid before
the approval of any final map or before the issuance of any
building permit if no final map is required.
This report presents the 1992 review of the Telegraph Canyon
Drainage Basin Fee and, where appropriate, makes adjustments to the
drainage fee based upon completed project construction, revised
development projections and revised project cost estimates.
This report recommends no change in the fee since the estimated fee
is $3920 per gross benefit acre and the change in amount does not
warrant revising the fee.
. ...~ 7"_-'/"/
ATTACHMENT 6-A
ATTACHMENT #6-B
CI1Y OF CHUU VISTA ~
TELEGRAPH CANYON DRAINAGE PLAN
COST ESTIMATE
L Construction
DowDslrcam
De~ntion Sesnnent 1 Selnnent 2 Seoment 3 ImDl'ovements
Alluvium S 90,966 S 131,2S0 N/A (See
Clear " Grub 32,000 49,400 N/A Appendix B)
Mass Excavation 143,878 N/A N/A
Rip Rap 159,936 371,978 N/A
Surface Drainage 72,373 276,300 N/A
Storm Drain 90,734 95,000 N/A
LaDclscaping 195,832 368,900 79,323
LaDclscapc Maintenance 7,000 15,600 N/A
Fencing 36,177 77,400 N/A
Structure Adjustment N/A 1,400 N/A
Subdrain N/A 18,000 N/A
Existing Structure
Removal N/A 3,900 N/A
Excavation"
Embankment N/A 490,940 N/A
Export N/A 602,400 N/A
Miscellaneous 3,500 28,000 53,784
Earthwork" Grading N/A N/A 46,110 ........
Drop Structure N/A N/A 9S7 ,838
Construction Staking N/A N/A N/A
Observation " Testing N/A N/A N/A
Traffic Control N/A N/A N/A
Protection " Restoration N/A N/A N/A
Right-or-Way Acquisition 23,so5 72,182 N/A
Drainage Control N/A N/A N/A
Subtotals: $ 855,901 52,Q1Z,650 $1,137,C155 4,160,000
Less Road-
Related Cost 625.166 , R?? ROO 933 795 0
CoDstruct1on Total: $ 230,735 S 779,8S0 5203,260 $4,160,000
Subtotal Coastruct1OD All Seplents: $5,373,845
CoutlqeuC7 @ 2"' lJl'74.770
Total COustruct1OD All Sepleuts: 56,448,615
Z. Incldeatals
A. Dcsigu, Survey, Suits @ 15% of CoastructioD Subtotal S BlJ6,fm
B. 1Dspccti0D llDd AcIminlstntiou @ 6% of Coustrucdou Subtotal 322,431
C. City Adm;";ctration @ 2% of CoastructioD Subtotal lf11,477
D. Euginccrin&/Projcct Consultants Q1Wl
..."-... SublGCal: $1,296,485
I'rqJect Total: $7,745,100 ~
4
:r - 1/? ATTACHMENT #6-8
~
e
----
'.
e/
.
~-I
'd
> !!i I
..
I I BJ~LL9
z
~!
zlft
....
u III III
ZIII ~
La :IE
....
~z
a-
lii"
...It
ilia
...
ATTACHMENT #6-0
f1~
III
.1
I'
I!
~
~ u :-J
ti!Z!i Q
www ~
1:Ii:li a
1;1 I&.
o
JII i
li:~ I
~ . =
...
I
I
~
.:z: 5" c:)
ATTACHMENT #6-0
--
.
MEMORANDUM
March 10, 1994
SUBJECT:
The Growth Management Oversight Commission
. less Valenzuela, Director of Parks and Recreati42v
Compliance with the Parks and Recreation Threshold Standard -luly I, 1992 to lune 30,
1993
TO:
FROM:
The Department is pleased to present a report on Parks and Recreation activities relating to the Parks and
Recreation Threshold Standard in the Growth Management Ordinance. A report was previously given
to the GMOC in March of 1993, and reviewed by the City Council in May, 1993. This report is
structured to provide the following information:
. FY 92/93 Department Overview
. Discussion of GMOC Issues of 1992/1993
. Review of Park Deficiency From Standard
. Planning Department's Growth Forecast and Its Correlation to the Park Deficiency
DEPARTMENT OVERVIEW
. The Department completed or commenced the following projects during the review period:
I. Approval of a 10int Use Agreement between the City of Chula Vista and the Sweetwater Union
High School District for the Facilities Located at Chula Vista Community Park and EastLake
High School
. 2. Approval of the Master Plan for the McCandliss Memorial and Halecrest Park
3. Approval of a grant application to the State of California Department of Parks and Recreation to
fund stage improvements at Memorial Park
4. Approval of the funds for the Los Ninos Restroom Renovation Project
S. Adoption of the Mission Statement Element for Three Year Strategic Plan
To provide safe, accessible and quality parks and recreation programs
that are designed to meet the needs of Chula Vista residents.
6. Accepted a Small Business Tree Planting Program Grant from the California Department of
Forestry and Fire Protection
7. Completed Phase I of the Play Equipment Capital Improvement Program utilizing State of
California Grant funds.
.
IJmoo: . ...,a.......)
1
J-I
Growth Management Oversight Commission
March 10, 1994
~
8. Completed Chula Vista Community Park at EastLake Greens, adding 12.9 acres to the City's
park system
9. Established the Youth ACTION Program at select high schools and middle schools
10. Forms the Youth Coalition in cooperation with the major youth-providers in the City
11. Completed the Youth Summit and collected information on human service needs for the middle
school and high school age youth
12. Initiated the construction projection at Rohr Park - Phase II
13. Initiated the Otay Park Master Plan and Joint-Use Program
14. Developed a joint-use program with the 4-H Club of San Diego County to provide latchkey
services in the Montgomery area
15. Continued to provide dual staffmg of elementary school playgrounds; increased number of
schools served from 15 to 18
16.
Appraised the property at Third and L for possible park acquisition. Staff in the process of
evaluating the appraisal
~
GMOC RECOMMENDATIONS FOR 1992-1993
Recommendation 1. As recommended each year since 1990, and endorsed by the Counc1llast
year, actively work toward adopting a revised Parks and Recreation
threshold standard to achieve 3 acres of parkland per 1,000 population for
the area west of Interstate 805 as well as east. In this regard, completion of
the western Chula Vista Parks Implementation Plan (PIP) is critical as it will
address Counc1l's inquiries regarding a credit system for major fac1lities such
as swimming pools, and other matters which must be resolved before the
final language of a revised standard can be completed. The PIP ls also
necessary as a foundation for formnlAfiIlg the subsequent 2O-year master
plan for the acquisition of land and construction of fac1lities to correct
existing fac1lities.
The status of a revised Parks and Recreation threshold standard for both east and west Chula Vista is that
while the Council agreed in concept, at the May 1993 joint meeting with the GMOC, to such a revised
standard, the Council directed that evaluation of a Park Equivalency Factor, as part of the PIP, should
first be completed as a partial basis upon which to standard a revised final threshold standard.
On March 8, 1994, the City Council approved the Work Program for the Parks Implementation Plan.
The Work Program is attached for the Commission's review (Attachment "A"). The Parks and
--.,
limo< - ..,a.-J
2
.}-z
.
.
.
Growth Management Oversight Commission
.
March 10, 1994
Recreation and Planning Departtnents are initially responsible for the work tasks. It is estimated that this
effort will begin in April, 1994 and conclude with a report to the City Council in the fall of 1995.
A Park Equivalency Factor policy, planned to be completed in Phase I of the Parks Implementation Plan,
would encompass an analysis which would include a school park policy whereby school land would be
utilized in a joint use with the City and counted as park credit. The study would include an evaluation
of area need (demand analysis), usable school acreage, and a phasing plan of school park development.
Further. the study would take into account existing public and quasi-public recreation facilities i.e.,
YMCA, Boys and Girls Club and the level of use of each respective facility. The Department estimates
it will take three months to complete the study and analysis of a Park Equivalency Factor and anticipates
it will be presented to the City Council in July or August, 1994. A working interdepartmental team has
been formed and a draft formula is being evaluated.
Recommendation 2. A Greenbelt Master Plan should be undertaken and closely coordinated with
the PIP to ensure optimum use of the Greenbelt for park and recreation
purposes. This Is especially Important for those Greenbelt areas west of 1-
805 due to the deficiency of parkland In that part of the City.
The Parks and Recreation Department has aggressively pursued joint planning of the Otay Valley
Regional Park. Staff is in the process of formulating a concept plan of the valley for Council review.
The concept plan will utilize the Resource Enhancement Plan as a guide toward passive and active park
development. The Department aggressively pursued funding for the park as well. In the 1994 California
Park and Wildlife Initiative (CALPAW), $10 Million has been earmarked for the Otay Valley. Funding
is contingent upon voter approval.
The Department has set up an interdepartmental team with all the affected departtnents to devise a
greenbelt trailslbike route plan. $95,000 of TDA funds has been earmarked for the study.
Recommendation 3. In col\lunction with recent Council direction for In-house preparation of the
PIP, direct the Involvement of the City Manager's Oftlce to the extent
required to ensure the interdepartmental coordination and prioritization
nece5sPry to achieve the PIP's timely completion. The GMOC Is concerned
with the current minimum estimate of 18 mouths, as compared to the
proposed consultant c:ontrac:t for completion by Aupst 1993.
As stated above, the City Co\JnCil has approved the Park Implementation Plan Work Program which
estimates a completion time of 18 months. In advising the Council of this time line, staff discussed how
the Park Implementation Plan would be coordinated with various City departments and melded with other
City projects. A working interdeparttnental team has been formed to develop the PIP. A major time
constraint for the completion of the PIP is the time required to meet with the public for input, the time
to present the proposed plan to various city commissions, and prepare a final report to the City Council.
IJI1llI' . .,..a.mom]
3
:)- 3
Growth Management Oversight Commission
March 10, 1994
"""'\
Recommendation 4. Create an impact fee program which will require new apartment
coDStrud:ion in western Chula Vista to pay park fees. Park Acquisition and
Development (PAD) fees are .........dly collected only for subdivisions,
Including condominium projects. With the approval of a Parks and
Recreation Implementation Plan which outlines specific proposed
improvements and areas of benefit, equitable impact fees can be collected
from new apartment development as well. It should be noted that the
completed PIP will provide the basis for this impact fee.
With the approval of the PIP, a DIP for apartments will be considered in the Plan.
Recommendation 5. Continue to require large .....der planned communities in the Eastern
Territories, which include proposed parks, to conduct a Needs Assessment,
which will determine the most appropriate site, size, and content of local
parks within the proposed community.
The Parks and Recreation Department concurs with this recommendation and will endeavor, in all future
negotiations with developers of the eastern territories, to include in the Development Agreement, a
condition for the developer to conduct a Needs Assessment.
Recommendation 6. The City currently does not have enough detailed criteria to judge the
adequacy of a proposed park site for dedication credit in terms of ......."
topography, accessibility, adJacent uses, and other factors. However, such
criteria area being incorporated into the Parks and Recreation Department's
Landscape Manual currently under preparation. The GMOC encourages the
City Council to support the timely completion and adoption of this Manual.
A draft Landscape Manual has been developed and is presently being reviewed by the City Attorney.
The Landscape Manual will then be presented to the Planning Commission and the Council this spring,
for adoption.
Recommendation 7. New multi-family projects in Western Chula Vista should be required to
provide a set amount of private recreation facilities within the development.
General provisions regarding such fadlities are Included in the proposed City
Design Review Manual being drafted
The City formed an ad hoc review group to consider the revision of the Design Review Manual. This
committee has been formed and is currently in session. Staff advises the committee will make their
recommendations in a report by the end of April, 1994. Staff will revise the manual according to the
committee's direction, and preaent the draft manual in public hearings to the Design Review Commission,
the Economic Development Commission, the Planning Commission and then to the City Council for
approval. Time estimated for this process is 6 months.
Recommendation 8. The Parks and Recreation Department should re-assess the appropriateness
of "mini-parks" in Western Chula Vista. While such parks are more
.......,
...... . ...,a.manl
4
}-4
.
.
.
Growth Management Oversight Commission
March 10. 1994
expensive in per-acre costs to develop and m..lnt..;n, they provide a more
IntlmSltIl scale for local ....gJ>horhoods, and may be the only method by
which local park deftciencies in Western Chula Vista can be remedied
without sigDificant co"......ngtlon of mdl"l develop:nmt. Again, tbls re-
as&-'!Ilt is part of the PIP's work p:ogram.
While the Department bas advised the GMOC that "mini-parks" are expensive to .....int.;n. the
Department is open to this concept in the future. However. with present budget constraints for operating
parks in the City. and the continuation of the slow economy in relation to the receipt of Park Acquisition
and Development (pAD) fees to fund Capitallmprovoment Program projects. it is anticipated that "mini-
parks" will not be considered for implementation in the near future. As stated in the recommendation.
the PIP will evaluate the use of "mini-parks" in the park system. and provide a recommendation and
strategy on the potential for acquisition of park sites. and an analysis of the viability of "mini-parks."
REVIEW OF PARK DEFICIENCY FROM STANDARD
Attached (Attachment "B") is a revised park deficiency statistics report. The numbers are slightly revised
from past years. based on population information provided by the City's Planning Department. The State
of California Department of Finance bas revised their formula for determining populations. and the City
bas subsequently amended their figures. As noted. the City continues to show a shortfall in park acreage;
however. with the addition of Chula Vista Community Park. the city-wide standard increased from 2.17
acres per thousand. to 2.25 acres per thousand. Also attached ("Cn) is an East/West Inventory as of
March. 1994.
PLANNING DEPARTMENT'S GROWTH FORECAST AND ITS CORRELATION TO THE PARK
DEFICIENCY .
The Planning Department issued a draft 12-18 month and 5-7 year Development Forecast Report for 1993
in January of 1994. Their report again reiterates the continued uncertainty as to the pace of recessionary
recovery. the regaining of consumer confidence in an unstable job market. and the availability of
development/construction financing in the wake of the S & L failures.
The forecast cites projections city-wide. and approximately 5-10 percent of this total is attributable to
growth and in-fill occurring in the Sweetwater District (approximately 50 - 100+ units per year). The
Sweetwater District generally encompasses the western area of Chula Vista. and there is no park
development and acquisition fee structure for in-fill (until the PIP is completed and there is a potential
to collect fees on apartments). As such. the continued projection for a moderate growth rate in the east
will not generate enough PAD fees for an aggressive park expansion program.
JV:
Attachments
"A" - PIP Work Program
"B" - Park Deficiency Statistics Report
"C" - East/West Inventory
- - ............]
5
'J-5
WORK PROGRAM OUTLINE
FOR TIlE
PARKS IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
(Mard11994)
Attachment "A"
~
INTRODUCTION/ST ATEMENT OF PURPOSE
The proposed Parks Implementation Plan (PIP) is intended to implement provisions of the amended Parks
and Recreation Element adopted in conjunction with the City's comprehensive General Plan Update in
July 1989. Goal I, Objective 1 of those provisions establishes the need to simultaneously upgrade
existing park facilities and plan for new park facilities to meet established parks standards. This will be
accomplished through preparation of a long range (2o-year) master plan which includes programs for
upgrading, expanding or replacing older facilities on the west side of the City, and for the installation of
new facilities in accordance with adopted standards.
The Parks and Recreation Element recognizes that the parks planning setting and issues are to a large
extent bisected between the older developed portion of the City, west of the I-80S freeway, and the
developing area to the east. In this context, the PIP's proposed structure is intended to be two-tiered,
the fIrSt consisting of a general analysis addressing overall facility needs and usages, and establish the
planning conditions and relationship(s) between the eastern and western portions of the City, and the
second to develop a more detailed plan to address deficiencies in Western Chula Vista, including
development of sub-area plans and strategies. Both tiers may consist of the following components:
An inventory of existing and projected physical and demographic conditions. i
An analysis of existing and projected parks and recreation facilities demand and any
deficiencies
An identification and feasibility analysis of potential means to mitigate deficiencies;
including joint-use possibilities and identification of potential acquisition sites for parks.
Policies, options and any related fIScal analysis.
Development of an Parks Implementation Plan establishing goals, objectives and policies,
a capital improvement strategy, and relationships to other planning efforts and programs.
A core Project Team will be formed and comprised of staff from the Parks and Recreation and Planning
Departments. The Project Team will also utilize staff from other City Departments such as Building and
Housing, Community Development and Public WorkslEngineering in completing the PIP.
The following Work Program is intended to provide greater detail as to the range and nature of tasks to
be undertaken:
PHASE I - SURVEY/NEEDS ASSESSMENT
A. INVENTORY OF EXISTING CONDmONS
1. Determination and description of the overall Study Area and any sub-areas.
This will consist of a brief City-wide overview and a more intensive Western Chula Vista
review, which would address physical (land use, character, resources, etc.) and
"""\
limo< - ,...a.man]
1
3-lp
.
.
.
PIP Program
-2-
March 1994
demographic characteristics (population [age, ethnicity, income, family characteristics,
etc.], housing, growth rates, etc.), and an inventory of existing park, school and open
space sites, public and quasi-public recreation facilities and programs. Data collection
will be from various in-house data bases and field surveys. Presentation of data will be
cross referenced in both tabular and map form.
In Western Chula Vista, potential planning sub-areas will be defined based on such
factors as demographics, demand, and geography; and would provide the above noted
data for each sub-area.
2. Survey existing plans and policies for applicability.
a. Chula Vista General Plan and other planning policies (includes evaluation of
proposed park sites and the current General Plan system of site designation).
Project Team members will review the existing General Plan for location of
future and proposed park sites, recreation centers, open space and related land
use elements.
b.
Park and Recreation Planning Standards, Guidelines and Policies (Federal, State
and Local).
Project Team members will review applicable guidelines and standards from the
City, State and National level.
c.
A review of the "Otay Valley Regional Park" joint staff efforts will be conducted
to determine a preliminary list of elements to be evaluated within the Study Area
during the inventory process. This review will include the recommendations of
the Resource Enhancement Plan.
c.
ADA requirements.
The Project Team will prepare a preliminary list, based on input from the
Building and Housing Department, of ADA standards which apply to the
facilities within the Study Area.
3. Vacant and Available Lands Inventory for parks and recreation purposes.
This task will utilize both in-house data base evaluations as well as field surveys and
confirmations. All lands will be evaluated, including existing elementary, middle and
high school sites and open space areas. The draft Parks and Recreation Department
J JlntI.cape Manual will be used to aid in initially defining acceptable sites.
limo< - ..,.a......!
2
J-7
PIP Program
PHASE IT - ANALYSIS
A. DEMAND ANALYSIS
-3-
March 1994
~
An analysis of the interrelationships of the demand differences between the eastern and western
areas of Chula Vista will be conducted at the City-wide level, with the major emphasis on the
demand in the area of 1-805. An additional analysis of identified sub-areas within Western Chula
Vista will occur under a separate and subsequent effort.
I. Existing use/need levels.
This will consist of statistical tallies of Parks and Recreation Department program
records, questionnaires, and the application of established parks planning standards and
guidelines to current demographic conditions as derived in Phase I (A.I.).
The types of Parks and Recreation Department records utilized will be program
attendance statistics and questionnaires from special events.
2. Public Opinion Survey on desired parks and recreation facilities.
A telephone survey of 600 resident households will encompass all age groups. The
survey will extract data on activity participation, attitudes, expected demand, potential
demand, and types of programs. The results will be tabulated and a written summary"""""
will be prepared.
3. Historic / Forecasted Population and Housing growth.
An overview of historical population growth volumes and rates for the Chula Vista area,
the region, and the County as a whole during the 1980 to 1993 period will be prepared.
For Western Chula Vista, a population growth analysis will include changes in the
demographic characteristics of the population during this time frame with particular
emphasis on those factors that are predictors of parks and recreation demand patterns
(age, income, family size, etc.).
Projections of growth through'the year 2015 will be compiled as principally derived
through an analysis of information collected by SANDAG (Series 8 regionwide forecast),
the California Department of Finance, and the City Planning Department.
4. Projected Demand for Facilities and Programs for Western Chula Vista (utilizing items
1-3 above).
The projected demand for new parks and recreation facilities will be quantified and
balanced with an analysis and overview of existing facilities with potentjai for expansion,
or in combination with other agencies' facilities through joint-use agreements.
-."
IID"'."""".......J
3
]" - ~
.
PIP Program
-4-
March 1994
(PubUc Input) The Parks and Recreation Commission would host a public meeting at this point to share
the results of the inventories and demand analyses, and solicit input and comment. This meeting will
facilitate finalization and acceptance of the information which will form the foundation for subsequent
deficiency assessments and plan development.
B. DEFICIENCY ASSESSMENT FOR WESTERN CHULA VISTA
1. Current Levels
The Department's existing Parldands and Public Facilities Ordinance describes certain
standards for parks and recreation facilities. These standards will be compared to the
existing provision of facilities (both east and west), and a deficiency level will be
determined .
2. Projected Levels For Western Chula Vista (2015)
Based on the current levels of deficiency and the potential for additions to the system;
any continuing deficiencies will be projected to the year 2015 based on the Demand
Analysis and the City's growth factors.
3.
ADA Compliance Evaluation of Existing Facilities
.
This assessment will compare the results of Phase I inventories to the Demand Analysis
to reach conclusions as to ADA surpluses and/or deficiencies in needed parks and
recreation facilities. The assessments should be conducted with the intent of identifying
those existing parks/facilities/programs which could be modified to meet the Federal
mandate.
C. LAND AVAILABILITY / FEASIBILITY ANALYSIS FOR ACQUlSmON, LEASES AND
DEVELOPMENT
1. This analysis will compare the vacant and available land inventory from Phase I to the
Deficiency Assessment in Phase II, in conjunction with existing policies and standards
for parks provision/development. Focus will be given to the Western Chula Vista area.
Dovetail proposed studies regarding use of the SDG&E easements for park and recreation
purposes and evaluate the viability of including certain land areas in the parkland
inventory. Such studies are envisioned to address the SDG&E proposals for commercial
uses.
D. POLlcms AND OPTIONS
I. FacilitieslLand Area Park Acreage Credit System.
An analysis will be performed to determine the feasibility of including existing
. public/quasi-public active recreation structures such as gyms, community centers or
IJlDO' - .,...a.man] 4
]-9
PIP Program
-5-
March 1994
~
aquatic facilities in a park acreage equivalency formula. In addition, joint use
opportunities with other public or quasi-public entities will be identified as another way
to factor in park acreage credit.
a. City-Owned Facilities.
The City's current recreation facilities will be identified as to whether its
structures can be encompassed in a land area credit system.
b. School-Park Joint Usage Policy.
An analysis will identify the two school districts with which any potential
agreements can be negotiated to share facilities, and recommend a policy for
implementation. The analysis may reveal a potential to allow park credit for use
of school facilities and lead to the development of a school park policy.
c. Quasi-Public Facilities Credit.
Based on the Inventory of Existing Conditions performed in Phase I, the quasi-
public facilities (Le., Boys and Girls Clubs, Churches, and the YMCA) will be
identified and recommended for credit against the parks acreage standard in order
to mitigate a portion of the deficiency.
~
2. Park Site Selection Policy.
The Parks and Recreation Department has developed a Park Site Selection Policy and will
recommend its inclusion in the Parks Implementation Plan for adoption by the City
Council.
3. Differential standards for seniors housing.
As the City of Chula Vista has no current standard for seniors' housing as a separate
housing density group, an analysis based on demographics will recommend a
classification.
4. Parks Development Impact Fee (DIP) collection for apartments.
An analysis will be performed on whether a Parks DIP should be instituted to facilitate
additional revenue to support existing and/or new parks and recreation facilities.
5. SDG&E Right-of-Way Usage.
Further analysis will be given in developing parks in the SDG&E easements. The
Special Study Area noted in the Montgomery Specific Plan will be the primary document
studied.
-,
_ - """".man)
5
}-ID
.
.
.
PIP Program
-6-
March 1994
It is envisioned that the above analyses would result in an Issues Paper identifying policies the
City would need to consider in developing a final PIP.
E. CONCLUSIONS
(public input)
PHASE m - IMPT.EMENTATlON PLAN I PROGRAM
A. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN
The Implementation Plan will be structured in two parts, the first being a brief overview of a
City-wide Plan which addresses the interrelationships between eastern and Western Chula Vista,
and the second focusing on Western Chula Vista (with defmed sub-areas). The Parks
Implementation Plan will be structured as follows:
.
1.
City-wide Goals, Objectives, Policies.
At minimum, will address a revised Parks and Recreation Threshold Standard,
a Parks Credit Policy, a review of the existing General Plan Diagram approach
to designating park sites along with establishment of techniques for the future
designation and development of parks, and identification of needed amendments
to any existing General Plan Elements. '
2.
Western Chula Vista Goals, Objectives, Policies
Will establish specific guidelines which will ensure implementation of the in
Western Chula Vista, recognizing the more specific conditions presented with in
each sub-area studied.
B. IMPLEMENTATION PROGRAM
1. The Parks Implementation Plan will recommend adoption of the implementation program
by the City Council.
2. The Parks Implementation Plan will discuss and recommend the available funding sources
to effectuate the components of the Plan; this will include:
a. A Western Chula Vista Capital Improvement Strategy;
b. A proposed American with Disabilities Act strategy to retrofit recreation
facilities; and
c.
Maintenanee and operations funds for acquisition and development of any parkst
and/or recreation facilities which may be proposed.
IJIIIllC . pIllC2,.....]
6
J~l\
PIP Program
-7-
March 1994
........
3. The Parks Implementation Plan will recommend feasible joint-use agreements with
proposed affected agencies, and also suggest funding sources should the joint-use
agreements entail building renovations or land development.
C. RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PLANNING EFFORTS AND PROGRAMS
1. Schools Study, Otay Valley Regional Park (OVRP) Plan, Otay Ranch General
Development Plan (GDP), Main Street Study, SDG&E Right-Of-Way's.
(public review and hearings)
..........
........
lJmo< - plOC2......]
7
:J-IL-
ATTACHMENT B
PARKLAND DEFICIENCY STATISTICS
. I JanulllY 1, 19921 July 1, 1992 I January 1,19931 June 30, 1993 I January 1, 1994 I
Popullllion - EIIlll of 1-805 39,698 39,868 40,994 41,243 41,379
Acres of Parke - EIIlll of 1-805 190.5 190.5 190.5 190.5 203.4
Acres/1,ooo - EIIlll 011-805 4.80 4.78 4.65 4.82 4.92
Acre ShortfaJl/Exceee - EIIlll of 1-805 71.41 70.90 87.52 66.n 79.26
Population - Wee! of 1-805 102,080 102,518 105,413 106,052 106,402
Acr. of Parke - Wee! of 1-805 129.45 129.45 129.45 129.45 129.45
Acree/l,ooo - Weet of 1-805 1.27 1.26 1.23 1.22 1.22
Acre ShortfaJl/Excess - Wee! of 1-805 -176.79 -178.10 -166.79 -188.71 -189.76
Popullllion - City-Wide 141,778 142,386 146,407 147,295 147,781
Acres of Parke - City-Wide 319.95 319.95 319.95 319.95 332.85
Acree/l,ooo - City-Wide 2.26 2.25 2.19 2.17 2.25
A_hOrtfall/Exce88 - City-Wide -105.384 -107.208 -119.271 -121.935 -110.49
425.334 427.158 439.221 441.885 443.34
Acres of Parkland. Standard/Ideal - City-Wide
For ""ary 1 acre For fNery 1 acre For ""ery 1 acre For ""ary 1 acre For fNery 1 acre
of parkland per of parkland per of parkland per of parkland per of parkland per
1000 reeidante in 1000 _idente in 1000 residante in 1000 neeidente in 1000 residante in
the wee!, there the weet, there the _, there the wee!, lhere the wee!, there
are: are: are: are: are:
3.78 3.78 3.78 3.78 4.04
acr. per 1000 acree per 1000 acres per 1000 acres per 1000 acree per 1000
intheelllll in the eee! in the eee! intheelllll in the 888l
.
J-13
[GMOC - parkdef2.wql - 03-02-94)
ATTACHMENT C
EASTIWEST PARK INVENTORY
as of March, 1994
City of Chula Vista
I
EAST OF 1-805
WEST OF 1-805
Park Acreage Park Acreage
Discovery Park 14.5 Eucalyptus Park 19.8
Greg Rogers Park 52.1 . J' Street Marina 21.4
Rohr Park 62.2 Bay Blvd. Park 1.5
Bonita Long Canyon 12.5 Friendship Park 8.4
Halecrest Park 2.0 Hilltop Park 10.9
Independence Park 4.1 , Lauderbach Park 4.0
Paseo del Rey Park 3.0 Lorna Verde Park 6.2
Rancho del Rey Park 10.2 Los Ninos Park 5.2
Sunbow Park 4.0 Marina View Park 4.5
Sunridge Park 6.0 Memorial Park 8.0
Terra Nova Park 8.5 Norman Park 1.7
Tiffany Park 7.2 Orange Avenue Fields 4.0
Valle Lindo Park 4.2 OtayPark 5.2
Chula Vista Reinstra Ball 6.0
Community Park 12.9 Fields
Palomar Park 3.1
SDG&E Park 18.0
Connoley Park .65
Holiday Estates 1 .26
Holiday Estates IT .26
Lancerlot Park .10
Sherwood Park .28
203.4 129.45
_...........0>-02-..)
J-H
'"""\
I
""""
.-.
.
.
.
CITY OF CHULA VISTA PLANNING DEPARTMENT
ANNUAL RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT FORECAST
JULY 1993
Proaram Overview
In accordance with the City's Growth Management Program, the Planning Department is
again pleased to release its annual 12 - 18 month and 5 - 7 year residential d'!lvelopment
forecasts and accompanying project location map. The forecasts address those projects
likely to reach the construction and/or completion phase within these time frames,
beginning July 1993. As in the past, the forecast information is separated according to the
two local water districts, Sweetwater Authority and Otay Water District. Although originally
derived for comparison to Otay's Water Allocation Program, this format continues to be
employed despite suspension of that Program. The boundaries between the two districts
are generally coincident with the older established, and newly developing areas of the City,
and thereby also enable a comparative view of anticipated development activity.
This forecast is primarily intended to assist the City and other key agencies, such as
school and water districts, in formulating and coordinating short- and long-range capital
improvement and facility financing plans. An evaluation by various City Departments and
extemal agencies as to the ability to accommodate the forecasted growth will be forwarded
to the City's Growth Management Oversight Commission (GMOC) for their use in
determining compliance with each of the City's adopted threshold standards (i.e.,traffic,
sewer, schools, etc.). '
The City is now in its fifth year of preparing the residential development forecasts, and is
continually endeavoring to enhance its techniques, particularly in relation to the mid-range
(5-7 year) forecast. Toward these ends, this year's forecast again incorporates
methodologies developed in conjunction with SANDAG, and consistent with the draft Series
8 regional forecast model. As the City is presented with the long lead times necessary for
the planning and financing of major infrastructure, such as SR-125, recognition of changing
regional growth pattems and their influence on the amount and timing of anticipated
development in Chula Vista becomes increasingly important. Ultimately the Planning
Department's goal is to work further with SANDAG to develop a computer-based
forecasting model which the City can use on an ongoing basis. While the application and
resuits of this methodology will be described in greater detail later in the report, it should
be noted that the revised approach again incorporates a "high-low" forecast range similar
to that used with the 12-18 month forecast.
K-l
-.,
C.v. Forecast
-2-
January, 1994
12- to 18-Month Forecast
In response to the ongoing recession and current economic climate, the forecast consists
of a range with a low-end and high-end. To ensure production of a reasonably accuratl'!
forecast range, staff conducted a four-part research process which included:
1) the preparation and analysis of a current project status sheet showing where each
proposal is in the development approval process (i.e. the "development pipeline");
2) a survey of individual developer's anticipated construction schedules;
3) a cross-checking of the above information as to the logical timing of development;
and
4) a review of past forecast performance, economic trends and historic development
activity .
While use of a range reflects the uncertainty in the timing and amount of construction
activity that may occur, it also enhances the forecasts usefulness as both a "worst case"
facility planning tool, and a "conservative side" revenue estimating tool. The low-end
forecast is principally based on a 3D-month trend analysis of residential permit activity
during 1991, 1992 and 1993; years reflecting the significant reductions in local building
activity as a result of the ongoing recession. The high-end forecast is based primarily on
developer's survey responses regarding expected construction schedules. The high-end
forecast results are reflected on Figures 1A (Otay District) and 18 (Sweetwater District).
No project specific tables were prepared for the low-end forecast.
.........
As the tables show, the high-end forecast projects 1696 dwelling units to be permitted for
construction, and 1770 dwelling units to reach occupancy over the 18 month period from
July 1993 through December 1994. The low-end forecast projects 669 units to be
permitted, and Iii units to reach occupancy over the same time frame. The apparently
large variant between the high and low forecasts directly reflects the continued uncertainty
as to the pace of recessionary recovery, the regaining of consumer confidence in an
unstable job market, and the availability of development I construction financing in the
wake of the S & L failures.
The Planning Department recommends that threshold compliance evaluations be
conducted against the high-end forecast figures, as they represent a maximum projected
Impact to public facilities and services. However, conslcleration should also be given to the
low-end forecast, as construction activity during the first six months of this forecast (July -
December 1993) more closely trends toward the low-end. A more detailed comparison
of actual residential permit activity to last year's forecast is presented below as a means
to illustrate the affect of extemal influences on forecast accuracy.
It should be noted that local economists are predicting only a modest increase in housing
unit authorizations on a county-wide basis during 1994, as compared to 1993. Although
not reflected on the attached July 1993 Project Status sheet (Figures 2A and 28), the City
.........
K-Z
.e
.
.
C.V. Forecast
-3-
January. 1994
Is beginning to see a rise in design review and plan check submittals as of the last several
months of 1993. Should those projects move to permit authorization in a timely manner.
residential activity will likely fall between the low and high ends. assuming the rise In
submittals is an accurate indicator of economic improvement.
Application of the Project Status sheets (Figures 2A and 28) in the forecast methodology
Is based on the assumption that, under normal City processing time frames. those projects
with units that have not reached Tentative Map approval are not expected to reach the
construction permit stage within the 12 -18 month forecast period. As such. they are listed
as information and are more fully considered In the 5 - 7 year forecast.
1992.1993 Forecast Comoarlson
As a means of illustrating extemal influences on forecast accuracy including construction
lending. housing demand, and the continuing effects of a prolonged recession, the
following provides an overview of actual residential construction activity relative to the first
twelve months of the previously submitted forecast.
12 MONTH FORECAST COMPARISON
~UL Y 1992 to JUNE 1993 (dwellina units)
City Total
~ Final
Low End Forecast 527 843
Actual Activity 261 811
Difference 266 32
% Difference -50 -4
Otay SWeetwater City Total
~ Final ~ fin!! ~ finIl
High End Forecast 596 856 53 192 649 1048
Actual Activity 196 603 65 208 261 811
Difference 400 253 +12 +16 388 237
% Difference -67 -30 -23 -8 -60 -23
As these tables demonstrate. actual permit Issuances levels were. on average. less than
half of what the high end forecast projected for this period. Permit finals were
approximately seventy-five percent of the high-end forecast. As for the low end forecast.
issuances were again about half of what was projected. however finals were forecasted
to within four percent of actual activity. In general, permit finals fell within the forecasted
K-3
C.V. Forecast
-4-
January, 1994
"""',
range, but trended to the low-end. The overestimation of permit issuances, even from the
low-end forecast, resulted from the drop-off in plan processing from prolonged recession,
which is still influencing the low-end forecast for the current period (July 1993 - December
1994).
For Informational purposes, Figure 4 has been included to reflect the City's historical
residential unit and population growth.
Commercial and Industrial Prolect Status
Also included with the residential forecast is a listing of commercial and industrial projects
currently under review by the City. Figure 3 shows the July 1993 processing status of
commercial and industrial projects. The data is not intended as a forecast, but rather as
information. On a comparative note, the cumulative square footage of commercial and
industrial development in process appears to have been relatively constant despite the
ongoing recession an its affects on residential activity. Last year's report indicated
3.180.997 square feet of commerciallindustrial development in process, compared to the
current figure of 3.665.244 square feet. It should be noted, however, that fewer
commercial and industrial projects are actually in process, and the reason for apparently
constant numbers is that the current year figures include several larger-scale master plans
which will be building-out over time, such as Kaiser Hospital, Rancho Del Rey Commercial
Center, Palomar Trolley Center and the Chula Vista Auto Park. The amount of industrial
and commercial construction completed during fiscal year 1992-1993 was 460.842 square
feet, compared to fiscal year 1991-1992's total of 430.000 square feet. Figures for fiscal
year 1993-1994 are not yet .available.
.........
!
.........,
\<-4
.. C.V. Forecast
.
.
-5-
January, 1994
Mld-Ranae 5- to 7-Vea, Develooment Forecast
As mentioned earlier, a new mid-range forecasting methodology, consistent with the
SANDAG draft Series 8 forecast model, has again been used for this forecast. The City's
Intent in coordinating our mid-range (5-7 year) forecast with Series 8, is to further Improve
our forecasting methodology consistent with the regional and sub-regional models, and to
allow for easier and more consistent updates of these forecasts. In doing so, the same
assumptions utilized in the Series 8 forecast for projecting future growth and development
In the region are applied locally to the City's forecast. These assumptions Include, but are
not limited to, population trends, economic trends, and infrastructure needs.
The Series 8 model also considers the remaining development potential of all lands, both
vacant and infill, within the greater San Diego Region and its subregions. Because of this,
local planning efforts, such as those related to public facility planning, will benefit from the
City's forecast being linked to the regional forecast, as it provides the City the ability to
consider the impact of all projects within and adjacent to our Planning Area. As such, the
mid-range forecast may be used to demonstrate compliance with the SR-125 facility
phasing and financing plan. This revised local forecasting approach will also enable the
City to more accurately anticipate long-range public facility needs, and to address
necessary pre planning by the development community in concert with the policies of the
o City and other affected govemment agencies.
A set of forecast figures for housing completions consisting of a range with a low-end and
a high-end are presented on Figure 5. Both forecast figures are based on the
fundamental premise that a city generated "capture rate" can be effectively used to predict
the amount of future growth when applied to SANDAG's annualized Series 8 forecast
figures. The term "capture rate" is most simply defined as a jurisdiction's annual building
activity represented as a percentage of the region's total building activity in the same year.
When averaged over a number of years in which both high and low growth cycles have
occurred, a City's long-term or historical capture rate may be used as a general indicator
in fore~sting future growth. In conducting a 12-year, regional share analysis of actual
construction activity (1980-1992), the Planning Department was able to determine the
City's present and historical capture rates. The results of this analysis, as indicated on
o Figure 5, show the City's 1992 year-end capture rate at 7.8 percent of the region's total,
and its historic rate to be 4.68 percent.
.
As a result of this analysis, and discussions with SANDAG staff, It was determined that the
low-end forecast should be blised on an annual rate of growth equal to the City's historic
capture rate, (4.68%) applied to the Series 8 annual figures for each year In the forecast
time frame (1992-2000). In order to avoid a straight line average, the Series 8 annual
growth rate variations were applied in deriving the annual City figures.
\<--5
~
C.V. Forecast
-6-
January. 1994
"""
The high-end forecast utilizes a different set of assumptions based on indicators in the
Draft Series 8 sub-area forecast allocations which project a shifting in regional growth
distribution for the 1990 to 2015 period. over that reflected by historic pattems. For
example, Chula Vista's forecasted overall capture rate for the 1990-2015 period is 9.23%.
compared to the 4.68% over the 1980 to 1992 period.
As shown on Figure 5. a longer-term average growth rate ranging from approximately
Wi to !An dwelling units per year may be expected to reach occupancy over the
forecast's 7-year time frame (1993-2000). It should be noted, however, that this projection
is city-wide. and approximately 5-10 percent of this total is attributable to growth and in-fill
occurring in the Sweetwater District (approximately 50 - 100+ units per annum).
Again, the Planning Department recommends that long-range public facility needs
assessments be conducted against the high end range of this forecast, as it represents a
maximum projected impact to public facilities and services.
(dlor7_13.rpt)
--.,
.......
j<-lt,
~ Ich~H 1111
=: 'Hili. 'I
111;;:..'11-'1
~ ilUllliih
II
. II I
\1 !
.1 L)\~ I · I
~,
I
I
.
i
,
I
I
i
i
,
i
!. .........
=c c....
c
.
r::'
.. 0
'-~-'L-..
..
...
"
,
_I,
, -'
~
..
CC
...U
0111
zG:A.
.oc
III~II
G:~z
~Zo
111-
~II~
z~c
III...U
.1110
III>'"
Olll~
Ccu
ZZIll
c...~
IIz0
zoG:
....A.
-.
0..
G:,
Oft
..
!
i
t ~ ~
E ~ ;
~ .. ..
~ ! I
Ii !1 '"
~ "
Ul
t ~ :;;
> i ~
i ~ ij
N
~
IiI
~ ~ g
. ~
...
I
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
---
.
.
.. .
Ul .
.
.
.
.
.
~ :
.
.
.
: ~
'" ~
... ..
~ ~
~ ~
" ..
~
.. ..
I ~ Ul
~
E ~
" ..
..
I
~ ~
II:
Ie
'" on '"
" ..
... ~
.. ~
.. on
Q 0 ~ ~ 0 0 . ~ ~
~ r- 1ft In .
...... ...
o 0 0 N t't 0
'" '"
.. ..
. ...
'" co
"
.. co
. '" ..
..
Ul
. ..
'" on
...
..
:0:
~ "
'" ..
..
..
N co
. ..
"
..
:0:
co on
'" '"
. "
'" "
N
!I:
" "
'" ..
..
..
CI'l lI'I 0\ ~ f"'I
........ N'"
co ...
on
...
.. co ..
'" "
"
...
. ..
.
o 0 CI . .
. on
. ..
. ...
.
.
.
.
. "
. ..
. ..
.
.
.
.
. ...
. ..
. ...
.
.
.
.
. ...
. on
. ~
.
.
.
.
. ~
. ..
. ...
.
.
.
.
. ..
. ~
. ~
.
.
.
.
. ..
. ...
. "
.
.
.
.
. ..
. ..
. ..
.
.
.
,
. ...
. ..
. ...
.
.
.
.
. .
. .
. ..
. ...
.
.
.
!I:
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ...
. ..
. ...
.
.
.
.
. "
. "
. ...
.
.
----------~-
.
. ..
. .
I ...
.
-----------.!.-
co
...
.. ..
on "
..
..
.. co
on ..
...
.. on
on '"
i
---
i .
si~1 ~=
~ i : = .. ~ ~
II~~~~~
If If f
.. .. ..
co co
" .
'"
. "
co
N
'"
N
'" ..
... '"
...
...
'" ..
" '"
...
~
'"
...
...
on
'"
. ...
...
. ~
~ i
~ ~ =
~ ~ I
..
..
..
..
~
..
.. on ..
on .
..
.
IiI
s i I
i II ~
emu Q M ~ 0 m ~ ~ . ~ Z E
K-~
N
..
"
~
I
!
..
I
I
.
...
,
"
...
E
It
..
It
~
j!i
~
.
~
..
..
~
..
I
a
i!
~
~
1.1
~
'"""I
..
~
~
..
I
.:
I
i
l!i
I
~
i!
~
S
"""'"
r:VMIBIT 1 A
.
.
~ ~
~ fi .-
~ ~ E
'" .. ~
e ~ z
E !i ~
! in -
, ~ ~
~ ~ ~
~ 6
.
111~
ili
.. ~
...
:: ~
.. ~
... ..
S!
i
~ ~
S!
.. :i!
.. ,.
.. ~
... ..
l
i g t;
., en
~
;: i
.. ~
... ..
i
i I
S!
----
..
en
..
en
..
en
S!
S!
t;
S!
Ie
o ... 0 rot '" f"'l
... ... ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.0.. 000
...... ...
.. on
...
..
en
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
------
..
..
...
...
...
i
e .,
~ l!i ~! m
!Bil!~
'i~~I~
... .. ~
K-<:}
..
.
. ..
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
. ~
.
.
.
.
.
.
. "
.
.
.
.
.
.
. "
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
. "
.
.
.
.
.
.
. "
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
. "
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
. ..
.
.
.
.
.
. "
. ~
.
.
.
.
.
. on
.
.
.
.
.
.
. "
.
.
.
.
.
:'1
..
..
.. ..
..
on
.. on
_V.....B...
..~B
i
; ~
~ 5
..
iq
;:: <
.. it
t; ..
a g
f
---------------------------
q~lI;~ ~ = ~ ~:
: t ~ ~ & :
~___L____________________L_
II Ia. II N fin fO\ I 0
" ~ u -
i~~~i !: - jl<
L___L____________________L_
I .. . 0 I 0
I ill l':J G Pi N
. ~ . .
i ! ~ ~ : i 0
L___L____________________L_
I III I = ~ =J~ r: II!
. . -
. 'i!:l .
i ! 2 ~ I ! ~
I
I""'
-
N
::
'"
.
I ~
... 0'< f"I or. .
; ~ ~ tD ~
i
L___L____________________L_
: ~ il;: ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ;
" ~ n N - . ....
" :: ~ " II
~~~~~ ~ ~!; ~~
L___L____________________L_
II II . 0
II < ~ ~ II .
~Z<VoI~ ~
. g:z It ~
U ~ < I!! II II 0
~ "" a:: ~ :: II
--.
~
L___L____________________~_
L___L______________________
. ~ ~ _ c c _ ~ ~ ~ ~ . f"I fO\ ~ ~ 0'< fO\ ~ ... fin 0 C II ~
. I " - ; - f"I ~ ~ ~ - ... ~ ~ - 0'< - N ~ U ~
~ _ ~ : .... ~ ~ fin ! ~ = ~ =
II Vol I: U
..
II - \I "
U ~ ~ "c = c ~ 0 c tD C : c = c ~ c ~ 2 ~ coo It ~
, .. c ~" - f"I . ~ N ~ fO\ ~ ... " ~
" ac; " _ " Ir'l
II I- II II
~
t!
g
'"
~
~ ~ ~
. 'i -
a ~ s
i ~ I
~ I ~
~ 'i
III
igl
; ~ ~
~ ~ ~ i
i ~ ~ --
I
i ; ~ ~
~ ~ ;
VI ~ VI Iii
EXH.lBIT 2A
L___L____________________L_
~ ~~ Ia. ~ ~ ! ~ ~ B ~ ~ ~ 1,1 ~
"~ ~ n - - 2 N ~ N
h II M
~ 8~~~: i ~ ~~
,. 11 " -
, , .
L___L____________________L_
I = ~ ~ I !: ~ ~ ~ s = - 2 I !
cg~..: 1: ;; $ 2 If!
. ~ . -
L___L____________________L_
. . 0 ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ I ~
: , : . _ S N ~ ~ ~ . ~ - ~ ~ . - ~ - ~ -
ci~: -- - - - .:
. t::. . .
I f ~ ~ i 0 ~ ~ 5 0 0 i 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ 0 ~ I 5 000 I J
L___L____________________L_
= c I ~ i S
I ~ ! ~ ~ ~! ~ ; ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;
c ~ c ~ i ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ r ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ ~ ~ ~ f
i f i ~!s~!;..~~;~~~~;~~..lli~ i
~ : Ii l:/ ~ 5!(! 5 ~ 5 ~ i i ~ ~ ; ; ~ :l
I " ~ = ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ _ _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ N
~___L____________________L
I< -ID
: ,Z
: < ~ e:
. !!i ,
. z:> II
. '" !i ~ "
. Q II
. "
.
.
~
~ i
.IS
~ ~
< <
to ~
i ~
f
.
i Ii I
~ ~ ~ i
,
.!!.
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
"
"
.!!.
..
:z: ;. '"
~ ~ ~
.L .!L
, ,
I t; l;
: :l ~ :
~ ::l ~
J!-
.... I: :
,
,.
.!!.
i ~
: ~ ~
: j:! ::l ~
,
.!!.
J!..
1-
1-
I
I
.. I ..
,
I ..
,
. ..
:!
JL
~ :!
"
,
,
2 ~ ~ :: ~
"
,
JL
, C>
"
,
,
,
. C>
,
,
J!-
on U !:
,
,
,
, C>
,
,
,
J!-
~
~
00000
~
j!:
~
~
~
~
I
i
I; . II! i
~l! I
\ ~ ~
s ,I l
6 I :;! .
. "g .
~ l ~
K-II
----- ------ --
:! coo 0 C Co -
N
N
c
!~~
::! g ~
.!!.
i i ~ ~
- u ~
.L. .L.
:I~:;C>=
. .. ,
o c :!
.!!.
C> ..
ceO 1:1 ~
o 0 2 f4 N
..
~
.!!.
.L.
I ~ :;! e; I :! !:
i i ~ ~ i :
.L___L
.
I
I
,
,
,
,
~ ~
"
,
~ I
.. "
,
,
.
,
,
,
,
,
,
J!..
c ceo C ...
::l
C> C> C>
II;
.L.
~ i ;
~
~
o 0 0 '" ... 0 0
.. ..
~
5 < .
~ ! ~
~~~
i .. ~
JL___
.L.
o 0 000
.. ~ !! "
.I ~ .
UiI
i
s,
I
JULY .. ~cw./1NOUSTR1Al./1NST1TL1TIONAL PRQ.ECT STf ' USTWG
--I l- I- I -----1
STAl\lS I REF. NO. I PROJECT NAME I ADDRESS I lB'FICE I RETAIL I IND I toTAL
--..1 l- I- I --1-1-\-- ......,
I DRC-90-15 I lK ENIEU'RIZES INC. I 165 AMENA CT. I I I 17000 I 1'7000
I DRC-92.06 1 SUNNY IMPORT BODY PARTS 1 3740 MAIN ST. I I I 11000 1 11000
UNDEIl I DRC-93-13 I SOUTHWOOD PSYClllA11UC I 330 MOSS ST. I :MIlO I I I 2490
CONST. I I I 375 "\I" ST. I I I I 0
I DIlC-92-49 I GES WAREHOUSE I 491 "C"ST. I 14560 I I I 14560
I DRC-91-72 I NEDICAL lB'FICE I 374 "\I" ST. I 2992 I I I 2992
-- --------
I DIlC-94-04 PRICE nUB 1144 BROADWAY 122114 I 113934 I I 236041
I DIlC-93-37 TACO BELL 155OE. "\I" ST. 19191 I I 1919
PLAN I MERVYN'S 555 I ST. I 13910 I 1 13910
OIECK I DIlC-92.o1 S11lUcnJRE FORM 11'19-11 NIRVANA AVE. I I 261911 26191
I IUlR SANl\lARY 915 PASEO RANCHERO 17995 I I I 17995
I DIlC.93-23 SOU1lIIlAY CllEVROLET orA Y LAKES RD. I -I I 29410
-- -------
I DRC-92-59 DISCOUNT ORNMEJ\'T AL UlON m DOR01llY ST. I 3:M5 I 3245
I DRC-91.o1 INDUS11UAL ENVDlOl'o'MENT 170 CANARlO CT. I 12070 I 12070
I DRC-91-46 RIO SWTR. PLAZA CAR WASH 1320 30TH ST. 12611 I I 12618
I DRC-91-56 OTAY RIO ALMAGAMETED 1 170-76 OT A Y RIO RD. I 35210 I 35210
I DRC-91-57 OTAY RIO ALMAGAMETED B 153-65 orA Y RIO RD. I 61160 I 61160
I DRC-91'51 or AY RIO ALMAGAMETED m 146-60 OT A Y RIO RD. I 30300 I 30300
I DRC-91.74 SWATH OCEAN. INC. NEC "G- ~ 'lUlELANDS I 31000 1 31000
I DRC-91-12 CUSHMAN PROPERTY 517 SIIINOIIARA LN. I 11??oo I 11??oo
I DRC 91-13 CHULA VISTA IND. PARK 10 N. 5TH AVE. 152064 I I 152064
I DRC-IlO.19 EASTI.AKE VD..LAGE OLR ~ EASTI.AKE VD..LAGE 155512 I I 155512
1 DRC.92.22 ARCO AMlPM GAS STATION 660-66"1." ST. 2915 I I 2915 .-.,
I DRC.92.30 SECURITY 1ST COMM. STRGE 1274 FOURTH AVE. I 25200 I 25200
I DRC-92.33 PADILLA INDCS11UAL CNTR 3733 MAIN ST. I 26000 I 26000
I DRC.92-41 KAISER PERMANEmE 2301 FEJ\'TON ST. 135??oo 1 I 1350000
DESIG!>: 1 DRC-92-51 MARQUEZ INDUS11UAL 3517MAIN ST. I 106000 I 106000
REVIEW I DRC-92.52 V.rs ASSOC., INC '293 NAPLES ST. 1600 I I I 1600
I DRC-92-57 FAIVRE ST. PARTNERSHIP 260SFAIVRE ST. I 1 7530 I 7530
I DRC.93.17 SOUTHBA Y GOLF CEl'o'TER 10 N. F1F1lI AVE. I 25710 I 25780
I DRC-93-11 RDR PRICE nUB E. "\I" ST. ~ 'I1ERRA DEL REY 1 136100 1 136100
I DRC-93-25 RDR HOME DEPOT E. "\I" ST. ~ 'I1ERRADELREY 125210 I 125210
I DRC-93-13 RDR K-MART E. "\I" ST. ~ 'I1ERRA DEL REY 12'7000 1 127000
I DRC.93-41 SANCHEZ MEDICAL 227 CHURCH A V. 4132 I 4132
I DRC-94.01 FULLER FOIlOOlONDA 500-40 AUTO PARK 42610 I 42610
I DRC-93-24 PALOMAR TROLLEY RETAIL PALOMAR STAlROADWAY 155100 I 155100
I DIlC-93-31 CV CNTR. MARKET PLACE 555 BROADWAY 3000 I 3000
I DIlC-93-29 CORPUS CRJSTI CHURCH 450 CORIlAL CANYON RD. 15741 I 15741
I DIlC-92-60 WEST AUTO WRECKERS 2365 MAIN ST. 11250 I 11250
I DIlC-93.o5 1ST UNIIED METH. CHURCH E. "\I" ST ....ASEO RANCHERO 25710 I 25710
I WINDMIlL FARMS 435 THDlD AVE. 11990 I 11990
I ICRIPPS HOSPITAL I'1F'11I AVEJ"II" ST. 1_ 10s000 I 22SOOO
I DRC-93-39 PURE PLATINUM 2350 MAIN ST. I lI6lO I lI6lO
I DRC-93-40 CV CONGREGATION OF 1W NEe E. "\I" ST. a '11!1IRA NOVADIlI 1000 1 I 1000
I DIlC-93.34 GREENE 2S15 FAIVRE ST. I I 11000 I 11000
I DRC-93-2O EASn.AKE VlLG. CNTR. EAS'ILAKE PKWYIFENTON I 1169 I I 1169
I DIlC-92-62 BOLLENBACHER ~ KELTON orAYLAKES/E. "\I" ST. I I 22336 I 22336 ......,
I DIlC.92-49 ltE. HAZARD I'1F'11IAV.I"C"ST. 1 I 107200 I 107200
-- --------
SUBTOTAL 1lIlDER CONS11lUC11ON 10042 I 01 3SOOO I 5S042
SUBtoTAL PLAN OIECK 142091 1 227324 1 26191 I 395620
SUBtoTAL DESIGN REVIEW 1511792 1 1033155 1 591935 I 3214512
toTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE 1750932 I 1261179 1 653133 1 3665244
K-I2- IE.lG1IBE...3
(Aug.... '113)
.
.
.
C.V. Forecast
-13-
January, 1994
HISTORIC HOUSING AND POPULATION GROWTH
CITY OF CHULA VISTA
Units Authorized for
Construction Certified Year End
(Permitted) Units Completed Population (State
Year (Finaled) D.C.F.)
1980 407 374 84,364
1981 195 496 86,597
1982 232 129 88,023
1983 479 279 89,370
1984 1,200 521 91,166
1985 (1) 1,048 1,552 116,325
1986 2,076 1,120 120,285
1987 1,168 2,490 124,253
1988 1,413 829 128,028
1989 1,680 1,321 134,337
1990 664 1,552 138,747
1991 747 701 142,217
1992 560 725 146,407
1993 435 462 147,781 (2)
(1) Montgomery Annexation
(2) Planning Department Estimate.
K-13
FIGURE 4
~
e
; i
.. s
~ ~
e ~
~ i
~ ~
~ a
..
~ ...
~
u ..
i
Q
~
IE
~
i
D
~
~
..
'"
'"
~d ~
! ! i
~ tI) ...
tI) ~ ....
~ C\ !
.. '" 11
i
!
~
~
; g i
: m i
~ ~ i
i j
I i ~
I ~ I ~
'"
~ ~ ~
IS
Iii
~
~
D
~
Ii:
~, ~ ~
_lq ..
IS
Ii;
~ ~ ; 5 ~
!c ~ ~ ~
!i .. fi .. ~
> oC a:: Cl ca:
Ii;
11 ~ ~
~ ~ ~
I
..
~ ~ '"
~ : ~ i
e :2 ~ ~
I i ~
Iii
-------------
.. \0 ,.. C ... I"l ... .
In 0 ,.. .. .. V\ ... ,..
\0 10 .. . . . \0 \0
... ... r4 ... ... ...
., . ., ., . . . ..
'" ... . ... ... \0 . "
1ft ,.. N fO'l '" \0 '" 1ft
..1ft,.......
. ... ... ""\11 1ft 1ft III
0...,..100..
In 1ft 1ft \0 .. eo: ... ....
... I"l '" ... ~ \0 ... 0 .. 1ft ~
... ... N 0 ~ . .. 1ft . 0 .
... ... ... I"l ..... " ... ... ..... ... \0
. ... .. .. 1ft 0 " N ... . .
... ... ... N N " " ... ...
----------
I"l 0 . III CJ\. CJ\. lI\ ...
Cl IlI\ r- ,.. \0 N N 0
\0 \0 ... lOt f"l N 0 0
... ... ... ... ... ...
.. ". . .. .. II' .. ..
N e ... ... Nine .
N . . N ... r- N 0
.. .. 11'I \0 \0 1ft ItI 11'I
... I"l '" ... IlI\ \0 ... 0 \0 '" CJ\.
... ... N 0 ~ . .. 1ft . 0 .
... ... ... I"l ~ N ... I"l I"l ... \0
\0 ,.. .. .. 11'I 0 N N ... CJ\. CJ\.
... ... ... N N N N ... ...
----------
II' .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. .. ..
... ... CJ\. ... ... ... ... CJ\. . ... \0
.. 1ft 1ft 0 ~ .. NON ... .
o .. N CJ\. ~ N I"l I"l N ... 0
... 0 0 0 0 ... ... ... ... ... ...
... I"l '" ... CJ\. \0 ... 0 \0 1ft CJ\.
... ... N 0 CJ\. . .. 1ft . 0 .
... ... ... ... ... N ... I"l I"l ... \0
\0 ... .. .. 1ft 0 N N ... CJ\. CJ\.
... ... ... N N N N ... ...
1ft N '" 0 ... 0 \0 ... ... I"l .
1ft ... . ... ... ... CJ\. I"l . ... ...
... . CJ\. ... .. lOON '" CJ\. \0
N . III 0 .. CJ\. 0 N .. In III
III \0 ... . CJ\. 0 ... 1ft ... CJ\. ...
CJ\. CJ\. CJ\. CJ\. CJ\. 0 0 0 0 0 ...
... ... ... ... ... ...
----------
- . . - . . . - - . . . -
~ ~ ~ N N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ c
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ C N ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .
N . N ~ N ~ ~ w ~ . . ~ ~
.
.
.
.
N ~ . . ~ c c ~ ~ . ~ C W N .
~ ~ N ~ N N ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ 0 w .
~ ~ N ~ W ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 0 w ~ . .
~ ~ N ~" .
. ~ . ~ . . ~ ~ 0 N ~ ~ ~ ~
N ~ ~ ~ . " W WNW ~ . . C
. ~ ~ . 0 0 . N . . W . C ~
~ N . " ~ . ~ ~ ~ . N N ~ .
"~ ~ N ~ ~ ~ N N ~ ~ ~
~
~ = ~ ~ : : : ~ : : I ~ ~ ~ . .. . ... . ~ 0
o = = = = = = = = = 0 = = = 5 5 5 5 E E ~
. ~
~ ~
~ ~
K-14
~
~ B
..
.
.
~
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
: e: ;
: '8 =
,
! ~
~
..
o
~
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
. ..
. . "
: .. ~
. ..
.
.
I i ~ ~
.
.
. ~ ~
! E ! :;
. ~ "
.
~
l""""\
.
~
,
.
N
,
~
o
.......
~
~
~
~
...
l!i
~
I
~
c:;
""""\
FIGURE 5